This is a modern-English version of Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Bisharin" to "Bohea": Volume 4, Slice 1, originally written by Various.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
Transcriber’s note: |
A few typographical errors have been corrected. It
appears in the text like this, and the
explanation will appear when the mouse pointer is moved over the marked
passage. Sections in Greek will yield a transliteration
when the pointer is moved over them, and words using diacritic characters in the
Latin Extended Additional block, which may not display in some fonts or browsers, will
display an unaccented version. Links to other EB articles: Links to articles residing in other EB volumes will be made available when the respective volumes are introduced online. |
THE ENCYCLOPÆDIA BRITANNICA
A DICTIONARY OF ARTS, SCIENCES, LITERATURE AND GENERAL INFORMATION
ELEVENTH EDITION
VOLUME IV SLICE I
Bisharin to Bohea
Articles in This Slice
Articles in This Section
BISHÂRÎN (the anc. Ichthyophagi), a nomad tribe of African “Arabs,” of Hamitic origin, dwelling in the eastern part of the Nubian desert. In the middle ages they were known as Beja (q.v.), and they are the most characteristic of the Nubian “Arabs.” With the Abâbda and Hadendoa they represent the Blemmyes of classical writers. Linguistically and geographically the Bishârîn form a connecting link between the Hamitic populations and the Egyptians. Nominally they are Mahommedans. They, however, preserve some non-Islamic religious practices, and exhibit traces of animal-worship in their rule of never killing the serpent or the partridge, which are regarded as sacred.
BISHÂRÎN (the ancient Ichthyophagi), a nomadic tribe of African “Arabs,” with Hamitic roots, living in the eastern part of the Nubian desert. In the Middle Ages, they were known as Beja (q.v.), and they are the most representative of the Nubian “Arabs.” Along with the Abâbda and Hadendoa, they are linked to the Blemmyes mentioned by classical authors. Linguistically and geographically, the Bishârîn serve as a bridge between the Hamitic populations and the Egyptians. They primarily identify as Muslims, but they also maintain some non-Islamic religious practices and show signs of animal worship by their custom of never killing the serpent or the partridge, which they consider sacred.
BISHOP, SIR HENRY ROWLEY (1786-1855), English musical composer, was born in London on the 18th of November 1786. He received his artistic training from Francisco Bianchi, and in 1804 wrote the music to a piece called Angelina, which was performed at Margate. His next composition was the music to the ballet of Tamerlan et Bajazet, produced in 1806 at the King’s theatre. This proved successful, and was followed within two years by several others, of which Caractacus, a pantomimic ballet, written for Drury Lane, may be named. In 1809 his first opera, The Circassian’s Bride, was produced at Drury Lane; but unfortunately the theatre was burned down after one performance, and the score of the work perished in the flames. His next work of importance, the opera of The Maniac, written for the Lyceum in 1810, established his reputation, and probably secured for him an appointment for three years as composer for Covent Garden theatre. The numerous works—operas, burlettas, cantatas, incidental music to Shakespeare’s plays, &c.—which he composed while in this position, are in great part forgotten. The most successful were—The Virgin of the Sun (1812), The Miller and his Men (1813), Guy Mannering and The Slave (1816), Maid Marian and Clari, introducing the well-known air of “Home, Sweet Home” (1822). In 1825 Bishop was induced by Elliston to transfer his services from Covent Garden to the rival house in Drury Lane, for which he wrote with unusual care the opera of Aladdin, intended to compete with Weber’s Oberon, commissioned by the other house. The result was a failure, and with Aladdin Bishop’s career as an operatic composer may be said to close. On the formation of the Philharmonic Society (1813) Bishop was appointed one of the directors, and he took his turn as conductor of its concerts during the period when that office was held by different musicians in rotation. In 1830 he was appointed musical director at Vauxhall; and it was in the course of this engagement that he wrote the popular song “My Pretty Jane.” His sacred cantata, The Seventh Day, was written for the Philharmonic Society and performed in 1833. In 1839 he was made bachelor in music at Oxford. In 1841 he was appointed to the Reid chair of music in the university of Edinburgh, but he resigned the office in 1843. He was knighted in 1842, being the first musician who ever received that honour. In 1848 he succeeded Dr Crotch in the chair of music at Oxford. The music for the ode on the occasion of the installation of Lord Derby as chancellor of the university (1853) proved to be his last work. He died on the 30th of April 1855 in impoverished circumstances, though few composers ever made more by their labours. Bishop was twice married: to Miss Lyon and Miss Anne Rivière. Both he and his wives were singers. His name lives in connexion with his numerous glees, songs and smaller compositions. His melodies are clear, flowing, appropriate and often charming; and his harmony is always pure, simple and sweet.
Bishop, Sir Henry Rowley (1786-1855), an English composer, was born in London on November 18, 1786. He trained artistically under Francisco Bianchi and wrote the music for a piece called Angelina in 1804, which was performed at Margate. His next work was the music for the ballet Tamerlan et Bajazet, which debuted in 1806 at the King’s Theatre. This was a success and was quickly followed by several others, including Caractacus, a pantomime ballet created for Drury Lane. In 1809, his first opera, The Circassian’s Bride, premiered at Drury Lane; however, the theater burned down after just one performance, and the score was lost in the fire. His next significant work, the opera The Maniac, written for the Lyceum in 1810, established his reputation and likely led to a three-year appointment as the composer for Covent Garden Theatre. Many of the numerous works he composed during this time—operas, burlettas, cantatas, incidental music for Shakespeare’s plays, etc.—are mostly forgotten now. The most successful among them were The Virgin of the Sun (1812), The Miller and his Men (1813), Guy Mannering and The Slave (1816), Maid Marian, and Clari, which features the famous tune “Home, Sweet Home” (1822). In 1825, Elliston persuaded Bishop to move from Covent Garden to its rival, Drury Lane, where he carefully composed the opera Aladdin, aiming to compete with Weber’s Oberon, which was commissioned by Covent Garden. However, this endeavor was a failure, marking the end of Bishop's career as an operatic composer. With the founding of the Philharmonic Society in 1813, Bishop became one of the directors and took his turn as conductor of its concerts during that period, which passed between different musicians. In 1830, he became the musical director at Vauxhall, and it was during this time that he wrote the popular song “My Pretty Jane.” His sacred cantata, The Seventh Day, was composed for the Philharmonic Society and performed in 1833. He earned his bachelor in music at Oxford in 1839. In 1841, he was appointed to the Reid chair of music at the University of Edinburgh but resigned in 1843. He was knighted in 1842, becoming the first musician to receive that honor. In 1848, he succeeded Dr. Crotch as the head of music at Oxford. The music for the ode marking the installation of Lord Derby as chancellor of the university in 1853 turned out to be his final work. He passed away on April 30, 1855, in financial distress, despite few composers earning more from their work. Bishop was married twice: to Miss Lyon and Miss Anne Rivière, both of whom were singers. His legacy endures through his many glees, songs, and smaller compositions. His melodies are clear, flowing, fitting, and often charming; his harmonies are always pure, simple, and sweet.
BISHOP, ISABELLA (1832-1904), English traveller and author, daughter of the Rev. Edward Bird, rector of Tattenhall, Cheshire, was born in Yorkshire on the 15th of October 1832. Isabella Bird began to travel when she was twenty-two. Her first book, The Englishwoman in America (1856), consisted of her correspondence during a visit to Canada undertaken for her health. She visited the Rocky Mountains, the South Pacific, Australia and New Zealand, producing some brightly written books of travel. But her reputation was made by the records of her extensive travels in Asia: Unbeaten Tracks in Japan (2 vols., 1880), Journeys in Persia and Kurdistan (2 vols., 1891), Among the Tibetans (1894), Korea and her Neighbours (2 vols., 1898), The Yangtze Valley and Beyond (1899), Chinese Pictures (1900). She married in 1881 Dr John Bishop, an Edinburgh physician, and was left a widow in 1886. In 1892 she became the first lady fellow of the Royal Geographical Society, and in 1901 she rode a thousand miles in Morocco and the Atlas Mountains. She died in Edinburgh on the 7th of October 1904.
Bishop, Isabella (1832-1904), English traveler and author, daughter of Rev. Edward Bird, rector of Tattenhall, Cheshire, was born in Yorkshire on October 15, 1832. Isabella Bird started traveling at the age of twenty-two. Her first book, The Englishwoman in America (1856), was made up of her letters during a trip to Canada that she took for her health. She traveled to the Rocky Mountains, the South Pacific, Australia, and New Zealand, producing a number of engaging travel books. However, she gained her reputation through her detailed accounts of her extensive travels in Asia: Unbeaten Tracks in Japan (2 vols., 1880), Journeys in Persia and Kurdistan (2 vols., 1891), Among the Tibetans (1894), Korea and her Neighbours (2 vols., 1898), The Yangtze Valley and Beyond (1899), and Chinese Pictures (1900). She married Dr. John Bishop, an Edinburgh physician, in 1881 and became a widow in 1886. In 1892, she became the first female fellow of the Royal Geographical Society, and in 1901, she rode a thousand miles in Morocco and the Atlas Mountains. She passed away in Edinburgh on October 7, 1904.
See Anna M. Stoddart, The Life of Isabella Bird (1906).
See Anna M. Stoddart, The Life of Isabella Bird (1906).
BISHOP (A.S. bisceop, from Lat. episcopus, Gr. ἐπίσκοπος, “overlooker” or “overseer”), in certain branches of the Christian Church, an ecclesiastic consecrated or set apart to perform certain spiritual functions, and to exercise oversight over the lower clergy (priests or presbyters, deacons, &c.). In the Catholic Church bishops take rank at the head of the sacerdotal hierarchy, and have certain spiritual powers peculiar to their office, but opinion has long been divided as to whether they constitute a separate order or form merely a higher degree of the order of priests (ordo sacerdotium).
Bishop (A.S. bisceop, from Lat. episcopus, Gr. bishop, “overlooker” or “overseer”), in certain branches of the Christian Church, is a religious leader who has been consecrated or set apart to carry out specific spiritual duties and to oversee the lower clergy (like priests or presbyters, deacons, etc.). In the Catholic Church, bishops rank at the top of the priestly hierarchy and hold unique spiritual powers associated with their role, but there has long been debate about whether they represent a separate order or just a higher level of the order of priests (ordo sacerdotium).
In the Roman Catholic Church the bishop belongs to the highest order of the hierarchy, and in this respect is the peer even of the pope, who addresses him as “venerable brother.” By the decree of the council of Trent he must be thirty Roman Catholic. years of age, of legitimate birth, and of approved learning and virtue. The method of his selection varies in different countries. In France, under the Concordat, the sovereign—and under the republic the president—had the right 2 of nomination. The same is true of Austria (except four sees), Bavaria, Spain and Portugal. In some countries the bishop is elected by the cathedral chapter (as in Württemberg), or by the bishops of the provinces (as in Ireland). In others, as in Great Britain, the United States of America and Belgium, the pope selects one out of a list submitted by the chapter. In all cases the nomination or election is subject to confirmation by the Holy See. Before this is granted the candidate is submitted to a double examination as to his fitness, first by a papal delegate at his place of residence (processus informativus in partibus electi), and afterwards by the Roman Congregation of Cardinals assigned for this purpose (processus electionis definitivus in curia). In the event of both processes proving satisfactory, the bishop-elect is confirmed, preconized, and so far promoted that he is allowed to exercise the rights of jurisdiction in his see. He cannot, however, exercise the functions proper to the episcopal order (potestas ordinis) until his consecration, which ordinarily takes place within three months of his confirmation. The bishop is consecrated, after taking the oath of fidelity to the Holy See, and subscribing the profession of faith, by a bishop appointed by the pope for the purpose, assisted by at least two other bishops or prelates, the main features of the act being the laying on of hands, the anointing with oil, and the delivery of the pastoral staff and other symbols of the office. After consecration the new bishop is solemnly enthroned and blesses the assembled congregation.
In the Roman Catholic Church, a bishop is the highest rank in the hierarchy and is considered equal to the pope, who refers to him as “venerable brother.” According to the decree from the Council of Trent, a bishop must be at least thirty years old, come from a legitimate background, and have proven knowledge and virtue. The way a bishop is chosen varies by country. In France, under the Concordat, the sovereign or, during the republic, the president had the power to nominate bishops. The same applies to Austria (except for four dioceses), Bavaria, Spain, and Portugal. In some countries, bishops are elected by the cathedral chapter (like in Württemberg), or by the bishops of the provinces (as in Ireland). In others, such as Great Britain, the United States, and Belgium, the pope chooses one candidate from a list submitted by the chapter. In all cases, the nomination or election must be confirmed by the Holy See. Before this is granted, the candidate undergoes a double examination for his suitability, first by a papal delegate at his residence (processus informativus in partibus electi), and then by the Roman Congregation of Cardinals assigned for this purpose (processus electionis definitivus in curia). If both evaluations are satisfactory, the bishop-elect is confirmed, formally recognized, and granted jurisdiction rights in his diocese. However, he cannot perform the specific functions of the episcopal order (potestas ordinis) until his consecration, which usually happens within three months of his confirmation. The bishop is consecrated after taking an oath of loyalty to the Holy See and affirming his profession of faith, by a bishop appointed by the pope, with the assistance of at least two other bishops or prelates. The main elements of the ceremony include the laying on of hands, anointing with oil, and the presentation of the pastoral staff and other symbols of the office. After the consecration, the new bishop is solemnly enthroned and blesses the gathered congregation.
The potestas ordinis of the bishop is not peculiar to the Roman Church, and, in general, is claimed by all bishops, whether Oriental or Anglican, belonging to churches which have retained the Catholic tradition in this respect. Besides the full functions of the presbyterate, or priesthood, bishops have the sole right (1) to confer holy orders, (2) to administer confirmation, (3) to prepare the holy oil, or chrism, (4) to consecrate sacred places or utensils (churches, churchyards, altars, &c.), (5) to give the benediction to abbots and abbesses, (6) to anoint kings. In the matter of their rights of jurisdiction, however, Roman Catholic bishops differ from others in their peculiar responsibility to the Holy See. Some of their powers of legislation and administration they possess motu proprio in virtue of their position as diocesan bishops, others they enjoy under special faculties granted by the Holy See; but all bishops are bound, by an oath taken at the time of their consecration, to go to Rome at fixed intervals (visitare sacra limina apostolorum) to report in person, and in writing, on the state of their dioceses.
The potestas ordinis of a bishop isn't exclusive to the Roman Church and is generally claimed by all bishops, whether they are from Eastern or Anglican traditions that have maintained the Catholic tradition in this regard. In addition to the full responsibilities of the presbyterate, or priesthood, bishops have the exclusive right (1) to confer holy orders, (2) to administer confirmation, (3) to prepare holy oil, or chrism, (4) to consecrate sacred places or items (like churches, churchyards, altars, etc.), (5) to bless abbots and abbesses, and (6) to anoint kings. However, when it comes to their jurisdiction, Roman Catholic bishops differ from others due to their unique responsibility to the Holy See. Some of their legislative and administrative powers they hold motu proprio by virtue of being diocesan bishops, while others are granted through special faculties from the Holy See; nonetheless, all bishops are required, through an oath taken at their consecration, to visit Rome at regular intervals (visitare sacra limina apostolorum) to report in person and in writing on the condition of their dioceses.
The Roman bishop ranks immediately after the cardinals; he is styled reverendissimus, sanctissimus or beatissimus. In English the style is “Right Reverend”; the bishop being addressed as “my lord bishop.”
The Roman bishop is next in line after the cardinals; he is referred to as reverendissimus, sanctissimus, or beatissimus. In English, the title used is “Right Reverend,” and the bishop is addressed as “my lord bishop.”
The insignia (pontificalia or pontificals) of the Roman Catholic bishop are (1) a ring with a jewel, symbolizing fidelity to the church, (2) the pastoral staff, (3) the pectoral cross, (4) the vestments, consisting of the caligae, stockings and sandals, the tunicle, and purple gloves, (5) the mitre, symbol of the royal priesthood, (6) the throne (cathedra), surmounted by a baldachin or canopy, on the gospel side of the choir in the cathedral church.
The insignia (pontificalia or pontificals) of the Roman Catholic bishop are (1) a ring with a jewel, representing loyalty to the church, (2) the pastoral staff, (3) the pectoral cross, (4) the vestments, including the caligae, stockings and sandals, the tunicle, and purple gloves, (5) the mitre, symbolizing the royal priesthood, and (6) the throne (cathedra), topped with a baldachin or canopy, located on the gospel side of the choir in the cathedral church.
The spiritual function and character of the Anglican bishops, allowing for the doctrinal changes effected at the Reformation, are similar to those of the Roman. They alone can administer the rite of confirmation, ordain priests and deacons, and exercise a certain dispensing power. In Anglican. the established Church of England the appointment of bishops is vested effectively in the crown, though the old form of election by the cathedral chapter is retained. They must be learned presbyters at least thirty years of age, born in lawful wedlock, and of good life and behaviour. The mode of appointment is regulated by 25 Henry VIII. c. 20, re-enacted in 1 Elizabeth c. 1 (Act of Supremacy 1558). On a vacancy occurring, the dean and chapter notify the king thereof in chancery, and pray leave to make election. A licence under the Great Seal to proceed to the election of a bishop, known as the congé d’eslire, together with a letter missive containing the name of the king’s nominee, is thereupon sent to the dean and chapter, who are bound under the penalties of Praemunire to proceed within twelve days to the election of the person named in it. In the event of their refusing obedience or neglecting to elect, the bishop may be appointed by letters patent under the Great Seal without the form of election. Upon the election being reported to the crown, a mandate issues from the crown to the archbishop and metropolitan, requesting him and commanding him to confirm the election, and to invest and consecrate the bishop-elect. Thereupon the archbishop issues a commission to his vicar-general to examine formally the process of the election of the bishop, and to supply by his authority all defects in matters of form, and to administer to the bishop-elect the oaths of allegiance, of supremacy and of canonical obedience (see Confirmation of Bishops). In the disestablished and daughter Churches the election is by the synod of the Church, as in Ireland, or by a diocesan convention, as in the United States of America.
The spiritual role and nature of Anglican bishops, considering the doctrinal changes made during the Reformation, are similar to those of Roman bishops. They alone can perform the rite of confirmation, ordain priests and deacons, and have certain dispensing powers. In the established Church of England, the appointment of bishops is essentially in the hands of the crown, although the old process of election by the cathedral chapter is still maintained. Bishops must be knowledgeable priests who are at least thirty years old, born of lawful wedlock, and of good character. The appointment process is governed by 25 Henry VIII. c. 20, which was re-enacted in 1 Elizabeth c. 1 (Act of Supremacy 1558). When a vacancy occurs, the dean and chapter inform the king through chancery and request permission to elect a new bishop. A license under the Great Seal to proceed with the election, known as the congé d’eslire, along with a letter containing the name of the king’s nominee, is then sent to the dean and chapter, who must proceed to elect the named person within twelve days or face penalties under Praemunire. If they refuse to comply or fail to elect, the bishop can be appointed by letters patent under the Great Seal without the formal election process. Once the election is reported to the crown, a mandate is issued requesting the archbishop and metropolitan to confirm the election and to invest and consecrate the bishop-elect. The archbishop then commissions his vicar-general to formally examine the election process, correct any issues, and administer the oaths of allegiance, supremacy, and canonical obedience to the bishop-elect (see Confirmation of Bishops). In the disestablished and daughter churches, the election is done by the church's synod, like in Ireland, or by a diocesan convention, as is the case in the United States.
In the Church of England the potestas ordinis is conferred by consecration. This is usually carried out by an archbishop, who is assisted by two or more bishops. The essential “form” of the consecration is in the simultaneous “laying on of hands” by the consecrating prelates. After this the new bishop, who has so far been vested only in a rochet, retires and puts on the rest of the episcopal habit, viz. the chimere. After consecration the bishop is competent to exercise all the spiritual functions of his office; but a bishopric in the Established Church, being a barony, is under the guardianship of the crown during a vacancy, and has to be conferred afresh on each new holder. A bishop, then, cannot enter into the enjoyment of the temporalities of his see, including his rights of presentation to benefices, before doing homage to the king. This is done in the ancient feudal form, surviving elsewhere only in the conferring of the M.A. degree at Cambridge. The bishop kneels before the king, places his hands between his, and recites an oath of temporal allegiance; he then kisses hands.
In the Church of England, the potestas ordinis is given through consecration. This is typically done by an archbishop, assisted by two or more bishops. The key part of the consecration is the simultaneous “laying on of hands” by the bishops performing the ceremony. After this, the new bishop, who has so far only worn a rochet, steps aside to put on the rest of the bishop's attire, called the chimere. Once consecrated, the bishop is qualified to perform all spiritual duties of his role; however, a bishopric in the Established Church, being a barony, is overseen by the crown during any vacancy and must be officially granted to each new holder. This means that a bishop cannot access the temporal benefits of his see, including rights to present individuals to benefices, until he pledges loyalty to the king. This is done in the traditional feudal manner, which still appears in the process of awarding the M.A. degree at Cambridge. The bishop kneels before the king, places his hands between the king's hands, recites an oath of loyalty, and then kisses the king's hands.
Besides the functions exercised in virtue of their order, bishops are also empowered by law to exercise a certain jurisdiction over all consecrated places and over all ordained persons. This jurisdiction they exercise for the most part through their consistorial courts, or through commissioners appointed under the Church Discipline Act of 1840. By the Clergy Discipline Act of 1892 it was decreed that the trial of clerks accused of unfitness to exercise the cure of souls should be before the consistory court with five assessors. Under the Public Worship Regulation Act of 1874, which gave to churchwardens and aggrieved parishioners the right to institute proceedings against the clergy for breaches of the law in the conduct of divine service, a discretionary right was reserved to the bishop to stay proceedings.
Besides the roles they perform within their position, bishops are also legally allowed to oversee all consecrated spaces and all ordained individuals. They mainly carry out this oversight through their consistorial courts or through commissioners appointed under the Church Discipline Act of 1840. The Clergy Discipline Act of 1892 established that the trial of clergy accused of being unfit to perform their pastoral duties should take place in the consistory court with five assessors. According to the Public Worship Regulation Act of 1874, which allowed churchwardens and affected parishioners to take action against clergy for violating laws during worship services, bishops were granted the discretionary power to halt these proceedings.
The bishops also exercise a certain jurisdiction over marriages, inasmuch as they have by the canons of the Church of England a power of dispensing with the proclamation of banns before marriage. These dispensations are termed marriage licences, and their legal validity is recognised by the Marriage Act of 1823. The bishops had formerly jurisdiction over all questions touching the validity of marriages and the status of married persons, but this jurisdiction has been transferred from the consistorial courts of the bishops to a court of the crown by the Matrimonial Causes Act of 1857. They have in a similar manner been relieved of their jurisdiction in testamentary matters, and in matters of defamation and of brawling in churches; and the only jurisdiction which they continue to exercise over the general laity is with regard to their use of the churches and churchyards. The churchwardens, who are representative officers of the parishes, are also executive officers of the bishops in all matters touching the decency and order of the churches and of the churchyards, and they are responsible to the bishops for the due discharge of their duties; but the abolition of church rates has relieved the churchwardens of the most onerous part of their duties, which was connected with the stewardship of the church funds of their parishes.
The bishops also have some authority over marriages, since they can, according to the canons of the Church of England, allow for the skipping of the proclamation of banns before marriage. These permissions are called marriage licenses, and their legal validity is recognized by the Marriage Act of 1823. Bishops used to have authority over all matters related to the validity of marriages and the status of married individuals, but this power was transferred from the bishops' consistorial courts to a crown court by the Matrimonial Causes Act of 1857. Similarly, they have lost their authority in testamentary matters, as well as in cases of defamation and fighting in churches; the only jurisdiction they still hold over the general public relates to their use of churches and churchyards. The churchwardens, who represent the parishes, also act as the bishops' representatives in maintaining decency and order in the churches and churchyards, and they are accountable to the bishops for fulfilling their responsibilities. However, the abolition of church rates has freed the churchwardens from the most burdensome part of their duties, which involved managing the church funds for their parishes.
The bishops are still authorized by law to dedicate and set apart buildings for the solemnization of divine service, and grounds for the performance of burials, according to the rites and ceremonies of the Church of England; and such buildings 3 and grounds, after they have been duly consecrated according to law, cannot be diverted to any secular purpose except under the authority of an act of parliament.
The bishops are still legally allowed to dedicate and designate buildings for holding religious services, as well as grounds for burials, according to the customs of the Church of England. Once these buildings 3 and grounds have been properly consecrated according to the law, they cannot be used for any non-religious purpose unless granted by an act of parliament.
The bishops of England have also jurisdiction to examine clerks who may be presented to benefices within their respective dioceses, and they are bound in each case by the 95th canon of 1604 to inquire and inform themselves of the sufficiency of each clerk within twenty-eight days, after which time, if they have not rejected him as insufficiently qualified, they are bound to institute him, or to license him, as the case may be, to the benefice, and thereupon to send their mandate to the archdeacon to induct him into the temporalities of the benefice. Where the bishop himself is patron of a benefice within his own diocese he is empowered to collate a clerk to it,—in other words, to confer it on the clerk without the latter being presented to him. Where the clerk himself is patron of the living, the bishop may institute him on his own petition. (See Benefice.)
The bishops of England have the authority to examine candidates who are proposed for positions within their dioceses. According to the 95th canon of 1604, they must assess each candidate's qualifications within twenty-eight days. If they do not reject him as unqualified within that time, they are required to either appoint him or grant him a license for the position, and then send a mandate to the archdeacon to induct him into the benefits of the position. If the bishop is the patron of a position in his own diocese, he can directly appoint a candidate without needing a formal presentation. If the candidate is also the patron of the position, the bishop can appoint him based on his own request. (See Benefice.)
As spiritual peers, bishops of the Church of England have (subject to the limitations stated below) seats in the House of Lords, though whether as barons or in their spiritual character has been a matter of dispute. The latter, however, would seem to be the case, since a bishop was entitled to his writ of summons after confirmation and before doing homage for his barony. Doubts having been raised whether a bishop of the Church of England, being a lord of parliament, could resign his seat in the Upper House, although several precedents to that effect are on record, a statute of the realm, which was confined to the case of the bishops of London and Durham, was passed in 1856, declaring that on the resignation of their sees being accepted by their respective metropolitans, those bishops should cease to sit as lords of parliament, and their sees should be filled up in the manner provided by law in the case of the avoidance of a bishopric. In 1869 the Bishops’ Resignation Act was passed. It provided that, on any bishop desiring to retire on account of age or incapacity, the sovereign should be empowered to declare the see void by an order in council, the retiring bishop of archbishop to be secured the use of the episcopal residence for life and a pension of one-third of the revenues of the see, or £2000, whichever sum should prove the larger. Other sections defined the proceedings for proving, in case of need, the incapacity of a bishop, provided for the appointment of coadjutors and defined their status (Phillimore i. 82).
As spiritual leaders, bishops of the Church of England have (with the limitations mentioned below) seats in the House of Lords, though it’s been debated whether they hold these as barons or in their spiritual roles. It seems to be the latter, since a bishop was eligible for his writ of summons after his confirmation and before paying homage for his barony. There were questions about whether a bishop of the Church of England, being a lord of parliament, could resign from his seat in the Upper House, although several instances of this happening have been recorded. In 1856, a statute was passed that applied specifically to the bishops of London and Durham, stating that when their resignations were accepted by their metropolitans, those bishops would stop sitting as lords of parliament, and their positions would be filled in the manner prescribed by law when a bishopric becomes vacant. In 1869, the Bishops’ Resignation Act was enacted. This law allowed any bishop wishing to retire due to age or inability to have the sovereign declare the see vacant through an order in council. The retiring bishop or archbishop would be guaranteed the use of the episcopal residence for life and a pension of one-third of the revenues from the see, or £2000, whichever amount was higher. Other sections outlined the process for proving a bishop's incapacity if necessary, provided for the appointment of coadjutors, and defined their status (Phillimore i. 82).
In view of the necessity for increasing the episcopate in the 19th century and the objection to the consequent increase of the spiritual peers in the Upper House, it was finally enacted by the Bishoprics Act of 1878 that only the archbishops and the bishops of London, Winchester and Durham should be always entitled to writs summoning them to the House of Lords. The rest of the twenty-five seats are filled up, as a vacancy occurs, according to seniority of consecration.
In light of the need to increase the number of bishops in the 19th century and the concerns about the resulting rise in spiritual peers in the House of Lords, the Bishoprics Act of 1878 established that only the archbishops and the bishops of London, Winchester, and Durham would always have the right to be summoned to the House of Lords. The remaining twenty-five seats would be filled based on the seniority of consecration as vacancies arose.
Bishops of the Church of England rank in order of precedency immediately above barons. They may marry, but their wives as such enjoy no title or precedence. Bishops are addressed as “Right Reverend” and have legally the style of “Lord,” which, as in the case of Roman Catholic bishops in England, is extended to all, whether suffragans or holders of colonial bishoprics, by courtesy.
Bishops of the Church of England rank just above barons in terms of precedence. They can marry, but their wives do not have a title or rank. Bishops are addressed as “Right Reverend” and hold the title of “Lord” legally, which, similar to Roman Catholic bishops in England, is used for all, including suffragans and those with colonial bishoprics, as a courtesy.
The insignia of the Anglican bishop are the rochet and the chimere, and the episcopal throne on the gospel side of the chancel of the cathedral church. The use of the mitre, pastoral staff and pectoral cross, which had fallen into complete disuse by the end of the 18th century, has been now very commonly, though not universally, revived; and, in some cases, the interpretation put upon the “Ornaments rubric” by the modern High Church school has led to a more complete revival of the pre-Reformation vestments.
The symbols of the Anglican bishop are the rochet and the chimere, along with the episcopal throne on the gospel side of the cathedral's chancel. The mitre, pastoral staff, and pectoral cross, which had fallen out of use by the end of the 18th century, have now been widely, though not universally, revived; in some cases, the modern High Church interpretation of the “Ornaments rubric” has resulted in a more comprehensive revival of the pre-Reformation vestments.
In the Orthodox Church of the East and the various communions springing from it, the potestas ordinis of the bishop is the same as in the Western Church. Among his qualifications the most peculiar is that he must be unmarried, which, since the secular priests are compelled to Orthodox Eastern. marry, entails his belonging to the “black clergy” or monks. The insignia of an oriental bishop, with considerable variation in form, are essentially the same as those of the Catholic West.
In the Eastern Orthodox Church and the various groups that come from it, the bishop's authority is the same as in the Western Church. One unique qualification is that he must be unmarried, which, since secular priests are required to marry, means he belongs to the “black clergy” or monks. The insignia of an Eastern bishop, although varying in form, are essentially the same as those of the Catholic West.
Besides bishops presiding over definite sees, there have been from time immemorial in the Christian Church bishops holding their jurisdiction in subordination to the bishop of the diocese. (1) The oldest of these were the chorepiscopi Subordinate bishops. (τῆς χώρας ἐπίσκοποι), i.e. country bishops, who were delegated by the bishops of the cities in the early church to exercise jurisdiction in the remote towns and villages as these were converted from paganism. Their functions varied in different times and places, and by some it has been held that they were originally only presbyters. In any case, this class of bishops, which had been greatly curtailed in the East in A.D. 343 by the council of Laodicea, was practically extinct everywhere by the 10th century. It survived longest in Ireland, where in 1152 a synod, presided over by the papal legate, decreed that, after the death of the existing holders of the office, no more should be consecrated. Their place was taken by arch-presbyters and rural deans. (2) The Episcopi regionarii, or gentium, were simply missionary bishops without definite sees. Such were, at the outset, Boniface, the apostle of Germany, and Willibrord, the apostle of the Frisians. (3) Bishops in partibus infidelium were originally those who had been expelled from their sees by the pagans, and, while retaining their titles, were appointed to assist diocesan bishops in their work. In later times the custom arose of consecrating bishops for this purpose, or merely as an honorary distinction, with a title derived from some place once included within, but now beyond the bounds of Christendom. (4) Coadjutor bishops are such as are appointed to assist the bishop of the diocese when incapacitated by infirmity or by other causes from fulfilling his functions alone. Coadjutors in the early church were appointed with a view to their succeeding to the see; but this, though common in practice, is no longer the rule. In the Church of England the appointment and rights of coadjutor bishops were regulated by the Bishops’ Resignation Act of 1869. Under this act the coadjutor bishop has the right of succession to the see, or in the case of the archiepiscopal sees and those of London, Winchester and Durham, to the see vacated by the bishop, translated from another diocese to fill the vacancy. (5) Suffragan bishops (episcopi sufraganei or auxiliares) are those appointed to assist diocesan bishops in their pontifical functions when hindered by infirmity, public affairs or other causes. In the Roman Church the appointment of the suffragan rests with the pope, on the petition of the bishop, who must prove that such is the custom of the see, name a suitable priest and guarantee his maintenance. The suffragan is given a title in partibus, but never that of archbishop, and the same title is never given to two suffragans in succession. In the Church of England the status of suffragan bishops was regulated by the Act 26 Henry VIII. c. 14. Under this statute, which, after long remaining inoperative, was amended and again put into force by the Suffragans’ Nomination Act of 1888, every archbishop and bishop, being disposed to have a suffragan to assist him, may name two honest and discreet spiritual persons for the crown to give to one of them the title, name, style and dignity of a bishop of any one of twenty-six sees enumerated in the statute, as the crown may think convenient. The crown, having made choice of one of such persons, is empowered to present him by letters patent under the great seal to the metropolitan, requiring him to consecrate him to the same name, title, style and dignity of a bishop; and the person so consecrated is thereupon entitled to exercise, under a commission from the bishop who has nominated him, such authority and jurisdiction, within the diocese of such bishop, as shall be given to him by the commission, and no other.
Besides bishops overseeing specific dioceses, there have been bishops in the Christian Church for a long time who held their authority under the bishop of the diocese. (1) The earliest of these were the chorepiscopi Assistant bishops. (bishops of the region), meaning country bishops, who were appointed by city bishops in the early church to exercise authority in remote towns and villages as they transitioned from paganism. Their roles varied in different times and places, and some argue they were originally just presbyters. Regardless, this group of bishops, which had been significantly reduced in the East in CE 343 by the council of Laodicea, was nearly extinct by the 10th century. It lasted longest in Ireland, where a synod led by the papal legate in 1152 decided that, after the existing holders of the office died, no more would be consecrated. They were replaced by arch-presbyters and rural deans. (2) The Episcopi regionarii, or gentium, were simply missionary bishops without defined dioceses. Such were, in the beginning, Boniface, the apostle of Germany, and Willibrord, the apostle of the Frisians. (3) Bishops in partibus infidelium were originally those who had been driven from their sees by pagans, and while keeping their titles, were appointed to help diocesan bishops in their work. Over time, the practice arose of consecrating bishops for this purpose or merely as an honorary title, deriving from places that were once part of Christendom but are now beyond its reach. (4) Coadjutor bishops are those appointed to help the bishop of the diocese when they are unable to perform their duties due to illness or other reasons. In the early church, coadjutors were appointed with the expectation that they would eventually succeed to the see; however, while common in practice, this is no longer the norm. In the Church of England, the appointment and rights of coadjutor bishops were defined by the Bishops’ Resignation Act of 1869. Under this act, the coadjutor bishop has the right to succeed the see, or in the case of archiepiscopal sees and those of London, Winchester, and Durham, to the see vacated by a bishop who has been transferred from another diocese. (5) Suffragan bishops (episcopi sufraganei or auxiliares) are those appointed to assist diocesan bishops in their ceremonial functions when hindered by illness, public duties, or other reasons. In the Roman Church, the pope appoints the suffragan upon the bishop's request, who must demonstrate that this is customary for the see, nominate a suitable priest, and ensure their support. The suffragan is given a title in partibus, but never that of archbishop, and the same title is never assigned to two suffragans in succession. In the Church of England, the status of suffragan bishops was defined by the Act 26 Henry VIII. c. 14. Under this statute, which remained inactive for a long time, was amended and re-enacted by the Suffragans’ Nomination Act of 1888, any archbishop or bishop wishing to have a suffragan to assist them can nominate two honest and respectable spiritual individuals for the crown to grant one of them the title, name, style, and dignity of a bishop of one of twenty-six listed sees, as the crown may decide. Once the crown selects one of these candidates, it can present him by letters patent under the great seal to the metropolitan, requiring him to consecrate this selected person to the same name, title, style, and dignity of a bishop; and the newly consecrated individual thereafter has the authority to exercise, under a commission from the bishop who nominated him, the jurisdiction and authority designated by that commission, and nothing else.
The title of bishop survived the Reformation in certain of the Lutheran churches of the continent, in Denmark, Norway, Finland, Sweden and Transylvania; it was temporarily restored in Prussia in 1701, for the coronation Lutheran churches. of King Frederick I., again between 1816 and 1840 by Frederick William III., and in Nassau in 1818. In these latter 4 cases, however, the title bishop is equivalent to that of “superintendent,” the form most generally employed. The Lutheran bishops, as a rule, do not possess or claim unbroken “apostolic succession”; those of Finland and Sweden are, however, an exception. The Lutheran bishops of Transylvania sit, with the Roman and Orthodox bishops, in the Hungarian Upper House. In some cases the secularization of episcopal principalities at the Reformation led to the survival of the title of bishop as a purely secular distinction. Thus the see of Osnabrück (Osnaburgh) was occupied, from the peace of Westphalia to 1802, alternately by a Catholic and a Protestant prince. From 1762 to 1802 it was held by Frederick, duke of York, the last prince-bishop. Similarly, the bishopric of Schwerin survived as a Protestant prince-bishopric until 1648, when it was finally secularized and annexed to Mecklenburg, and the see of Lübeck was held by Protestant “bishops” from 1530 till its annexation to Oldenburg in 1803.1
The title of bishop continued to exist after the Reformation in some Lutheran churches in Europe, including Denmark, Norway, Finland, Sweden, and Transylvania. It was briefly reinstated in Prussia in 1701 during the coronation of King Frederick I, again from 1816 to 1840 by Frederick William III, and in Nassau in 1818. However, in these later cases, the title of bishop is equivalent to "superintendent," which is the more commonly used term. Generally, Lutheran bishops do not assert or maintain unbroken “apostolic succession,” although those in Finland and Sweden are an exception. The Lutheran bishops of Transylvania sit alongside Roman and Orthodox bishops in the Hungarian Upper House. In some instances, the secularization of episcopal principalities during the Reformation allowed the title of bishop to remain as a purely secular distinction. For example, the see of Osnabrück was alternately held by a Catholic and a Protestant prince from the peace of Westphalia until 1802. From 1762 to 1802, it was held by Frederick, Duke of York, the last prince-bishop. Similarly, the bishopric of Schwerin existed as a Protestant prince-bishopric until 1648, when it was finally secularized and added to Mecklenburg, and the see of Lübeck was held by Protestant “bishops” from 1530 until its annexation to Oldenburg in 1803.1
In other Protestant communities, e.g. the Moravians, the Methodist Episcopal Church and the Mormons, the office and title of bishop have survived, or been created. Their functions and status will be found described in the accounts of the several churches.
In other Protestant communities, e.g. the Moravians, the Methodist Episcopal Church, and the Mormons, the role and title of bishop have continued to exist or have been established. You can find descriptions of their functions and status in the accounts of the different churches.
See Wetzer and Welte, Kirchenlexikon, s. “Bischof” and “Weihen”; Hinschius, Kirchenrecht, vol. ii.; Herzog-Hauck, Realencyklopadie, s. “Bischof” (the author rather arbitrarily classes Anglican with Lutheran bishops as not bishops in any proper sense at all); Phillimore’s Ecclesiastical Law; the articles Order, Holy; Vestments; Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction; Episcopacy.
See Wetzer and Welte, Kirchenlexikon, s. “Bishop” and “Ordination”; Hinschius, Church Law, vol. ii.; Herzog-Hauck, Real Encyclopedia, s. “Bishop” (the author somewhat arbitrarily categorizes Anglican bishops alongside Lutheran bishops as not being bishops in any true sense); Phillimore’s Ecclesiastical Law; the articles Order, Holy; Vestments; Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction; Episcopacy.
1 The title prince-bishop, attached in Austria to the sees of Laibach, Seckau, Gurk, Brixen, Trent and Lavant, and in Prussia to that of Breslau, no longer implies any secular jurisdiction, but is merely a title of honour recognized by the state, owing either to the importance of the sees or for reasons purely historical.
Below The title of prince-bishop, associated in Austria with the dioceses of Laibach, Seckau, Gurk, Brixen, Trent, and Lavant, and in Prussia with Breslau, no longer carries any secular authority. It is simply an honorary title acknowledged by the state, due either to the significance of the dioceses or for purely historical reasons.
BISHOP AUCKLAND, a market town in the Bishop Auckland parliamentary division of Durham, England, 11 m. S.S.W. of the city of Durham, the junction of several branches of the North Eastern railway. Pop. of urban district (1901) 11,969. It is beautifully situated on an eminence near the confluence of the Wear and the Gaunless. The parish church is 1 m. distant, at Auckland St Andrews, a fine cruciform structure, formerly collegiate, in style mainly Early English, but with earlier portions. The palace of the bishops of Durham, which stands at the north-east end of the town, is a spacious and splendid, though irregular pile The site of the palace was first chosen by Bishop Anthony Beck, in the time of Edward I. The present building covers about 5 acres, and is surrounded by a park of 800 acres. On the Wear 1½ m. above Bishop Auckland there is a small and very ancient church at Escomb, massively built and tapering from the bottom upward. It is believed to date from the 7th century, and some of the stones are evidently from a Roman building, one bearing an inscription. These, no doubt, came from Binchester, a short distance up stream, where remains of a Roman fort (Vinovia) are traceable. It guarded the great Roman north road from York to Hadrian’s wall. The industrial population of Bishop Auckland is principally employed in the neighbouring collieries and iron works.
Bishop Auckland is a market town in the Bishop Auckland parliamentary division of Durham, England, located 11 miles S.S.W. of the city of Durham, and it's the junction of several branches of the North Eastern railway. The population of the urban district was 11,969 in 1901. It's beautifully situated on a hill near where the Wear and Gaunless rivers meet. The parish church, located 1 mile away at Auckland St Andrews, is a fine cruciform structure that was once collegiate, featuring mainly Early English style but with some earlier elements. The palace of the bishops of Durham, located at the northeast end of town, is a spacious and impressive, albeit irregular, building. Bishop Anthony Beck chose this site for the palace during the reign of Edward I. The current structure covers about 5 acres and is surrounded by an 800-acre park. 1½ miles upstream from Bishop Auckland on the Wear, there is a small, ancient church at Escomb that is massively built and tapers as it rises. It's believed to date back to the 7th century, and some of its stones are clearly from a Roman building, with one stone bearing an inscription. These stones likely originated from Binchester, a short distance upstream, where remains of a Roman fort (Vinovia) can still be seen. It once guarded the important Roman north road from York to Hadrian’s wall. Most of the industrial population of Bishop Auckland works in the nearby coal mines and ironworks.
BISHOP’S CASTLE, a market town and municipal borough in the southern parliamentary division of Shropshire, England; the terminus of the Bishop’s Castle light railway from Craven Arms. Pop. (1901) 1378. It is pleasantly situated in a hilly district to the east of Clun Forest, climbing the flank and occupying the summit of an eminence. Of the castle of the bishops of Hereford, which gave the town its name, there are only the slightest fragments remaining. The town has some agricultural trade. It is governed by a mayor, 4 aldermen and 12 councillors. Area, 1867 acres.
Bishop's Castle, is a market town and municipal borough in the southern parliamentary division of Shropshire, England; it serves as the endpoint of the Bishop’s Castle light railway from Craven Arms. Population (1901) was 1,378. It’s nicely located in a hilly area to the east of Clun Forest, sitting on the slope and at the top of a hill. Only a few remnants remain of the bishop's castle of Hereford, which gave the town its name. The town has some agricultural trade. It is run by a mayor, 4 aldermen, and 12 councillors. Total area is 1,867 acres.
Bishop’s Castle was included in the manor of Lydbury, which belonged to the church of Hereford before the Conquest. The castle, at first called Lydbury Castle, was built by one of the bishops of Hereford between 1085 and 1154, to protect his manor from the Welsh, and the town which sprang up round the castle walls acquired the name of Bishop’s Castle in the 13th century. In 1292 the bishop claimed to have a market every Friday, a fair on the eve, day and morrow of the Decollation of St John, and assize of bread and ale in Bishop’s Castle, which his predecessors had held from time immemorial. Ten years later he received a grant from Richard II. of a market every Wednesday and a fair on the 2nd of November and two days following. Although the town was evidently a borough by the 13th century, since the burgesses are mentioned as early as 1292, it has no charter earlier than the incorporation charter granted by Queen Elizabeth in 1572. This was confirmed by James I. in 1617 and by James II. in 1688. In 1584 Bishop’s Castle returned two members to parliament, and was represented until 1832, when it was disfranchised.
Bishop’s Castle was part of the manor of Lydbury, which was owned by the church of Hereford before the Conquest. The castle, initially known as Lydbury Castle, was built by one of the bishops of Hereford between 1085 and 1154 to defend his manor from the Welsh. The town that developed around the castle walls began to be called Bishop’s Castle in the 13th century. In 1292, the bishop claimed to have a market every Friday, a fair on the eve, day, and the day after the Decollation of St John, and an assize of bread and ale in Bishop’s Castle, which his predecessors had maintained for centuries. Ten years later, he received a grant from Richard II for a market every Wednesday and a fair on November 2nd and the two following days. Although the town was clearly a borough by the 13th century, as burgesses are mentioned as early as 1292, it did not receive a charter until the incorporation charter granted by Queen Elizabeth in 1572. This was confirmed by James I in 1617 and by James II in 1688. In 1584, Bishop’s Castle sent two members to parliament and was represented until 1832, when it lost that status.
BISHOP STORTFORD, a market town in the Hertford parliamentary division of Hertfordshire, England; 30½ m. N.N.E. from London by the Cambridge line of the Great Eastern railway. Pop. of urban district (1901) 7143. It lies on the river Stort, close to the county boundary with Essex, and has water-communication with London through the Lea and Stort Navigation. The church of St Michael, standing high above the valley, is a fine embattled Perpendicular building with western tower and spire. The high school, formerly the grammar school, was founded in the time of Elizabeth. Here were educated Sir Henry Chauncy, an early historian of Hertfordshire (d. 1719), and Cecil Rhodes, who was born at Bishop Stortford in 1853. There are a Nonconformist grammar school, a diocesan training college for mistresses, and other educational establishments. The industries include brewing and malting, coach-building, lime-burning and founding, and there are important horse and cattle markets.
Bishop Stortford, is a market town in the Hertford parliamentary division of Hertfordshire, England; 30½ miles North-Northeast from London by the Cambridge line of the Great Eastern railway. The population of the urban district in 1901 was 7,143. It is located on the River Stort, near the county boundary with Essex, and has water access to London through the Lea and Stort Navigation. The church of St. Michael, which stands high above the valley, is an impressive Perpendicular style building with a western tower and spire. The high school, originally a grammar school, was established during the time of Elizabeth. Notable alumni include Sir Henry Chauncy, an early historian of Hertfordshire (d. 1719), and Cecil Rhodes, who was born in Bishop Stortford in 1853. There is a Nonconformist grammar school, a diocesan training college for women teachers, and other educational institutions. The local industries include brewing and malting, coach-building, lime-burning, and metal founding, and there are significant horse and cattle markets.
Before the Conquest the manor of Bishop Stortford is said to have belonged to Eddeva the Fair, wife of Harold, who sold it to the bishop of London, from whom it was taken by William the Conqueror. William restored it after a few years, and with it gave the bishop a small castle called Waytemore, of which there are scanty remains. The dungeon of this castle, called “Bishop’s Hole” or “Bishop’s Prison,” was used as an ecclesiastical prison until the 16th century. The town now possesses no early incorporation charters, and although both Chauncy and Salmon in their histories of Hertfordshire state that it was created a borough by charter of King John in 1206, the charter cannot now be found. The first mention of Bishop Stortford as a borough occurs in 1311, in which year the burgesses returned two members to parliament. The town was represented from that date until 1332, and again in 1335-1336, but the privilege was then allowed to lapse and has never been revived.
Before the Conquest, the manor of Bishop Stortford is said to have belonged to Eddeva the Fair, wife of Harold, who sold it to the Bishop of London. William the Conqueror later took it from him. After a few years, William restored it and also gave the bishop a small castle called Waytemore, of which only a few remains exist. The dungeon of this castle, known as “Bishop’s Hole” or “Bishop’s Prison,” served as an ecclesiastical prison until the 16th century. The town currently has no early incorporation charters, and although both Chauncy and Salmon in their histories of Hertfordshire claim that it was established as a borough by a charter from King John in 1206, that charter cannot be found now. The first mention of Bishop Stortford as a borough occurs in 1311, when the burgesses returned two members to parliament. The town was represented from that date until 1332, and again in 1335-1336, but then that privilege lapsed and has never been revived.
BISKRA, a town of Algeria, in the arrondissement of Batna, department of Constantine, 150 m. S.W. of the city of Constantine and connected with it and with Philippeville by rail. It lies in the Sahara 360 ft. above the sea, on the right bank of the Wad Biskra, a river which, often nearly dry for many months in the year, becomes a mighty torrent after one or two days’ rain in winter. The name Biskra applies to a union of five or six villages of the usual Saharan type, scattered through an oasis 3 m. in length by less than 1 m. broad, and separated by huge gardens full of palm and olive trees. The houses are built of hardened mud, with doors and roof of palm wood. The foreign settlement is on the north of the oasis; it consists of a broad main street, the rue Berthe (from which a few side streets branch at right angles), lined with European houses, the whole in the style of a typical French winter resort, a beautiful public garden, with the church in the centre, an arcade, a pretentious mairie in pseudo-Moorish style with entrance guarded by terra-cotta lions, some good shops, a number of excellent hotels and cafes, a casino, clubs, and, near by, a street of dancing and singing girls of the tribe of Walad-Nail. East of the public garden is Fort St Germain, named after an officer killed in the insurrection of the Zaatcha in 1849; it is capable of resisting any attack of the Arabs, and extensive enough to shelter the whole of the civil population, who took refuge therein during the rebellion of 1871. It contains barracks, hospital and government offices. To the south-east lies the Villa Landon with magnificent gardens filled with tropical plants. The population (1906) of the chief settlement was 4218, of the whole oasis 10,413.
BISKRA, is a town in Algeria, located in the Batna district of Constantine, about 150 miles southwest of Constantine city, and connected to it and Philippeville by train. It sits in the Sahara at an elevation of 360 feet above sea level, on the right bank of the Wad Biskra, a river that often runs nearly dry for many months each year but transforms into a powerful torrent after just one or two days of rain in winter. The name Biskra refers to a collection of five or six typical Saharan villages scattered through an oasis that is 3 miles long and less than 1 mile wide, separated by large gardens filled with palm and olive trees. The houses are made of hardened mud, with doors and roofs made from palm wood. The foreign settlement is located to the north of the oasis, featuring a wide main street, Rue Berthe (with a few side streets branching off at right angles), lined with European-style homes that resemble a classic French winter resort. There’s a beautiful public garden with a church at the center, an arcade, a prominent mairie in pseudo-Moorish style guarded by terra-cotta lions, some quality shops, several excellent hotels and cafés, a casino, clubs, and nearby, a street with dancing and singing girls from the Walad-Nail tribe. To the east of the public garden is Fort St Germain, named after an officer killed during the Zaatcha uprising in 1849. The fort is equipped to withstand any Arab attack and is spacious enough to shelter the entire civilian population, who sought refuge there during the rebellion of 1871. It includes barracks, a hospital, and government offices. To the southeast is Villa Landon, known for its stunning gardens filled with tropical plants. The population of the main settlement was 4,218 in 1906, with a total of 10,413 in the entire oasis.
From November to April the climate of Biskra is delightful. Nowhere in Algeria can be found more genial temperature or clearer skies, and while in summer the thermometer often registers 110° F. in the shade, and 90° at night, the pure dryness of the air in this practically rainless region makes the heat 5 endurable. The only drawback to the climat is the prevalence of high cold winds in winter. These winds cause temperatures as low as 36°, but the mean reading, on an average of ten years, is 73°.
From November to April, the climate in Biskra is wonderful. You won't find a more pleasant temperature or clearer skies anywhere in Algeria. While summer temperatures can often reach 110°F in the shade and 90°F at night, the dry air in this mostly rainless area makes the heat bearable. The only downside to the climate is the frequent cold winds during winter, which can drop temperatures to as low as 36°F, but the average over ten years is around 73°F.
In the oasis are some 200,000 fruit trees, of which about 150,000 are date-palms, the rest being olives, pomegranates and apricots. In the centre of the oasis is the old kasbah or citadel.
In the oasis, there are around 200,000 fruit trees, with about 150,000 being date palms; the rest include olives, pomegranates, and apricots. At the center of the oasis stands the old kasbah, or citadel.
In 1844 the duc d’Aumale occupied this fort, and here, on the night of the 12th of May of that year, the 68 men who formed the French garrison were, with one exception, massacred by Arabs. In the fort are a few fragments of Roman work—all that remains of the Roman post Ad Piscinam.
In 1844, the Duke of Aumale took control of this fort, and on the night of May 12th of that year, the 68 soldiers who made up the French garrison were, with one exception, killed by Arabs. Inside the fort are a few remnants of Roman construction—this is all that is left of the Roman outpost Ad Piscinam.
Biskra is the capital of the Ziban (plural of Zab), a race of mixed Berber and Arab origin, whose villages extend from the southern slopes of the Aures to the Shat Melrir. These villages, built in oases dotted over the desert, nestle in groves of date-palms and fruit trees and waving fields of barley. The most interesting village is that of Sidi Okba, 12 m. south-east of Biskra. It is built of houses of one story made of sun-dried bricks. The mosque is square, with a flat roof supported on clay columns, and crowned by a minaret. In the north-west corner of the mosque is the tomb of Sidi Okba, the leader of the Arabs who in the 1st century of the Hegira conquered Africa for Islam from Egypt to Tangier. Sidi Okba was killed by the Berbers near this place in A.D. 682. On his tomb is the inscription in Cufic characters, “This is the tomb of Okba, son of Nafi. May God have mercy upon him.” No older Arabic inscription is known to exist in Africa.
Biskra is the capital of the Ziban (the plural of Zab), a group of mixed Berber and Arab origin, whose villages stretch from the southern slopes of the Aures to Shat Melrir. These villages, located in oases throughout the desert, are surrounded by date-palm groves, fruit trees, and fields of barley. The most notable village is Sidi Okba, located 12 miles southeast of Biskra. It features one-story houses made of sun-dried bricks. The mosque is square, has a flat roof supported by clay columns, and is topped by a minaret. In the northwest corner of the mosque is the tomb of Sidi Okba, the Arab leader who conquered Africa for Islam from Egypt to Tangier in the 1st century of the Hegira. Sidi Okba was killed by the Berbers near this location in A.D. 682. On his tomb is an inscription in Cufic script, stating, “This is the tomb of Okba, son of Nafi. May God have mercy upon him.” No older Arabic inscription is known to exist in Africa.
BISLEY, a village of Surrey, England, 3½ m. N.W. of Woking. The ranges of the National Rifle Association were transferred from Wimbledon here in 1890. (See Rifle.)
BISLEY, a village in Surrey, England, 3.5 miles northwest of Woking. The National Rifle Association's shooting ranges were moved here from Wimbledon in 1890. (See Rifle.)
BISMARCK, OTTO EDUARD LEOPOLD VON, Prince, duke of Lauenburg (1815-1898), German statesman, was born on the 1st of April 1815, at the manor-house of Schönhausen, his father’s seat in the mark of Brandenburg. The family has, since the 14th century, belonged to the landed gentry, and many members had held high office in the kingdom of Prussia. His father (d. 1845), of whom he always spoke with much affection, was a quiet, unassuming man, who retired from the army in early life with the rank of captain of cavalry (Rittmeister). His mother, a daughter of Mencken, cabinet secretary to the king, was a woman of strong character and ability, who had been brought up at Berlin under the “Aufklärung.” Her ambition was centred in her sons, but Bismarck in his recollections of his childhood missed the influences of maternal tenderness. There were several children of the marriage, which took place in 1806, but all died in childhood except Bernhard (1810-1893), Otto, and one sister, Malvina (b. 1827), who married in 1845 Oscar von Arnim. Young Bismarck was educated in Berlin, first at a private school, then at the gymnasium of the Graue Kloster (Grey Friars). At the age of seventeen he went to the university of Göttingen, where he spent a little over a year; he joined the corps of the Hannoverana and took a leading part in the social life of the students. He completed his studies at Berlin, and in 1835 passed the examinations which admitted him to the public service. He was intended for the diplomatic service, but spent some months at Aix-la-Chapelle in administrative work, and then was transferred to Potsdam and the judicial side. He soon retired from the public service; he conceived a great distaste for it, and had shown himself defective in discipline and regularity. In 1839, after his mother’s death, he undertook, with his brother, the management of the family estates in Pomerania; at this time most of the estate attached to Schönhausen had to be sold. In 1844, after the marriage of his sister, he went to live with his father at Schönhausen. He and his brother took an active part in local affairs, and in 1846 he was appointed Deichhauptmann, an office in which he was responsible for the care of the dykes by which the country, in the neighbourhood of the Elbe, was preserved from inundation. During these years he travelled in England, France and Switzerland. The influence of his mother, and his own wide reading and critical character, made him at one time inclined to hold liberal opinions on government and religion, but he was strongly affected by the religious revival of the early years of the reign of Frederick William IV.; his opinions underwent a great change, and under the influence of the neighbouring country gentlemen he acquired those strong principles in favour of monarchical government as the expression of the Christian state, of which he was to become the most celebrated exponent. His religious convictions were strengthened by his marriage to Johanna von Puttkamer, which took place in 1847.
Bismarck, Otto Edward Leopold von, Prince, duke of Lauenburg (1815-1898), was a German statesman born on April 1, 1815, at the Schönhausen manor, his father's estate in Brandenburg. The family had been part of the landed gentry since the 14th century, with many members serving in high positions in the Prussian kingdom. His father (d. 1845), whom he spoke of fondly, was a quiet, humble man who retired from the army early as a captain of cavalry (Rittmeister). His mother, a daughter of Mencken, cabinet secretary to the king, was a strong and capable woman raised in Berlin during the Enlightenment. Her ambitions were focused on her sons, but Bismarck felt the lack of maternal affection in his childhood memories. They had several children after their marriage in 1806, but all except Bernhard (1810-1893), Otto, and one sister, Malvina (b. 1827), who married Oscar von Arnim in 1845, died young. Young Bismarck was educated in Berlin, first at a private school and then at the Grey Friars gymnasium. At seventeen, he went to the University of Göttingen, where he spent a little over a year, joining the Hannoverana student association and playing an active role in social life. He completed his studies in Berlin and passed the exams in 1835 that qualified him for public service. Although he was meant for diplomacy, he worked for a few months in administrative roles at Aix-la-Chapelle before moving to Potsdam for judicial matters. He soon left public service, finding it unsatisfactory and lacking in discipline. After his mother's death in 1839, he and his brother managed the family's Pomeranian estates, with much of the Schönhausen estate needing to be sold. In 1844, after his sister got married, he moved back in with his father at Schönhausen. He and his brother actively participated in local issues, and in 1846 he was appointed Deichhauptmann, responsible for maintaining the dikes that protected the Elbe region from flooding. During these years, he traveled to England, France, and Switzerland. His mother's influence and his broad reading made him initially lean toward liberal ideas on government and religion. However, he was significantly influenced by the religious revival during Frederick William IV's early reign; his views changed dramatically, and under the encouragement of local landowners, he developed strong beliefs in monarchical governance as the embodiment of a Christian state, of which he eventually became the most notable advocate. His religious beliefs were further solidified by his marriage to Johanna von Puttkamer in 1847.
In the same year he entered public life, being chosen as substitute for the representative of the lower nobility of his district in the estates-general, which were in that year summoned to Berlin. He took his seat with Parliamentary career. extreme right, and distinguished himself by the vigour and originality with which he defended the rights of the king and the Christian monarchy against the Liberals. When the revolution broke out in the following year he offered to bring the peasants of Schönhausen to Berlin in order to defend the king against the revolutionary party, and in the last meeting of the estates voted in a minority of two against the address thanking the king for granting a constitution. He did not sit in any of the assemblies summoned during the revolutionary year, but took a very active part in the formation of a union of the Conservative party, and was one of the founders of the Kreuzzeitung, which has since then been the organ of the Monarchical party in Prussia. In the new parliament which was elected at the beginning of 1849, he sat for Brandenburg, and was one of the most frequent and most incisive speakers of what was called the Junker party. He took a prominent part in the discussions on the new Prussian constitution, always defending the power of the king. His speeches of this period show great debating skill, combined with strong originality and imagination. His constant theme was, that the party disputes were a struggle for power between the forces of revolution, which derived their strength from the fighters on the barricades, and the Christian monarchy, and that between these opposed principles no compromise was possible. He took also a considerable part in the debates on the foreign policy of the Prussian government; he defended the government for not accepting the Frankfort constitution, and opposed the policy of Radowitz, on the ground that the Prussian king would be subjected to the control of a non-Prussian parliament. The only thing, he said, that had come out of the revolutionary year unharmed, and had saved Prussia from dissolution and Germany from anarchy, was the Prussian army and the Prussian civil service; and in the debates on foreign policy he opposed the numerous plans for bringing about the union of Germany, by subjecting the crown and Prussia to a common German parliament. He had a seat in the parliament of Erfurt, but only went there in order to oppose the constitution which the parliament had framed. He foresaw that the policy of the government would lead it into a position when it would have to fight against Austria on behalf of a constitution by which Prussia itself would be dissolved, and he was, therefore, one of the few prominent politicians who defended the complete change of front which followed the surrender of Olmütz.
In the same year he entered public life, he was chosen as a substitute for the representative of the lower nobility of his district in the estates-general, which met in Berlin that year. He took his seat on the extreme right and made a name for himself with the energy and originality with which he defended the rights of the king and the Christian monarchy against the Liberals. When the revolution erupted the following year, he offered to bring the peasants of Schönhausen to Berlin to defend the king against the revolutionary party, and in the last meeting of the estates, he voted in a minority of two against the address thanking the king for granting a constitution. He did not sit in any of the assemblies convened during the revolutionary year, but he played a very active role in forming a union of the Conservative party and was one of the founders of the Kreuzzeitung, which has since then been the voice of the Monarchical party in Prussia. In the new parliament that was elected at the beginning of 1849, he represented Brandenburg and was one of the most frequent and incisive speakers of what came to be known as the Junker party. He took a prominent role in discussions on the new Prussian constitution, consistently defending the king's authority. His speeches during this period showed strong debating skills, paired with significant originality and imagination. His constant theme was that the party disputes were a struggle for power between revolutionary forces, which drew strength from the fighters on the barricades, and the Christian monarchy, asserting that no compromise was possible between these opposing principles. He also played a major role in debates on the foreign policy of the Prussian government; he defended the government for rejecting the Frankfurt constitution and opposed Radowitz's policy on the grounds that the Prussian king would be subjected to the control of a non-Prussian parliament. He stated that the only entities that emerged from the revolutionary year unscathed and saved Prussia from dissolution and Germany from anarchy were the Prussian army and the Prussian civil service. In discussions on foreign policy, he opposed various proposals for uniting Germany by placing the crown and Prussia under a common German parliament. He had a seat in the parliament of Erfurt but only attended to oppose the constitution framed by that parliament. He foresaw that the government's policy would lead it into a situation where it would have to fight against Austria over a constitution that would ultimately dissolve Prussia itself, and thus, he was one of the few prominent politicians who supported the complete change of course that followed the surrender of Olmütz.
It was probably his speeches on German policy which induced the king to appoint him Prussian representative at the restored diet of Frankfort in 1851. The appointment was a bold one, as he was entirely without diplomatic experience, Diplomatic career. but he justified the confidence placed in him. During the eight years he spent at Frankfort he acquired an unrivalled knowledge of German politics. He was often used for important missions, as in 1852, when he was sent to Vienna. He was entrusted with the negotiations by which the duke of Augustenburg was persuaded to assent to the arrangements by which he resigned his claims to Schleswig and Holstein. The period he spent at Frankfort, however, was of most importance because of the change it brought about in his own political opinions. When he went to Frankfort he was still under the influence of the extreme Prussian Conservatives, men like the Gerlachs, who regarded the maintenance of the principle of the 6 Christian monarchy against the revolution as the chief duty of the Prussian government. He was prepared on this ground for a close alliance with Austria. He found, however, a deliberate intention on the part of Austria to humble Prussia, and to degrade her from the position of an equal power, and also great jealousy of Prussia among the smaller German princes, many of whom owed their thrones to the Prussian soldiers, who, as in Saxony and Baden, had crushed the insurgents. He therefore came to the conclusion that if Prussia was to regain the position she had lost she must be prepared for the opposition of Austria, and must strengthen herself by alliances with other powers. The solidarity of Conservative interests appeared to him now a dangerous fiction. At the time of the Crimean War he advocated alliance with Russia, and it was to a great extent owing to his advice that Prussia did not join the western powers. Afterwards he urged a good understanding with Napoleon, but his advice was met by the insuperable objection of King Frederick William IV. to any alliance with a ruler of revolutionary origin.
It was probably his speeches on German policy that led the king to appoint him as the Prussian representative at the restored diet of Frankfort in 1851. The appointment was a risky move since he had no diplomatic experience, Diplomatic career. but he proved to be worthy of the trust placed in him. During the eight years he spent in Frankfort, he gained an unparalleled knowledge of German politics. He was frequently assigned important missions, such as in 1852, when he was sent to Vienna. He was tasked with the negotiations that persuaded the duke of Augustenburg to agree to the arrangements under which he relinquished his claims to Schleswig and Holstein. However, the time he spent in Frankfort was most significant because it changed his own political views. When he arrived in Frankfort, he was still under the influence of the extreme Prussian Conservatives, like the Gerlachs, who believed that maintaining the principle of the 6 Christian monarchy against the revolution was the main duty of the Prussian government. He was prepared to support a close alliance with Austria based on this belief. However, he discovered that Austria had a clear intention to diminish Prussia's standing and to reduce her status as an equal power, along with considerable jealousy of Prussia among the smaller German princes, many of whom owed their thrones to Prussian soldiers who had crushed the uprisings in places like Saxony and Baden. As a result, he concluded that if Prussia wanted to regain its lost status, it would need to prepare for opposition from Austria and strengthen itself through alliances with other powers. The idea of a united Conservative front now seemed to him a dangerous illusion. During the Crimean War, he supported an alliance with Russia, and it was largely due to his advice that Prussia chose not to side with the western powers. Later, he advocated for a good relationship with Napoleon, but his suggestion was met with King Frederick William IV's firm refusal to ally with a leader of revolutionary background.
The change of ministry which followed the establishment of a regency in 1857 made it desirable to appoint a new envoy at Frankfort, and in 1858 Bismarck was appointed ambassador at St Petersburg, where he remained for four years. During this period he acquired some knowledge of Russian, and gained the warm regard of the tsar, as well as of the dowager-empress, herself a Prussian princess. During the first two years he had little influence on the Prussian government; the Liberal ministers distrusted his known opinions on parliamentary government, and the monarchical feeling of the prince regent was offended by Bismarck’s avowed readiness for alliance with the Italians and his disregard of the rights of other princes. The failure of the ministry, and the estrangement between King William and the Liberal party, opened to him the way to power. Roon, who was appointed minister of war in 1861, was an old friend of his, and through him Bismarck was thenceforward kept closely informed of the condition of affairs in Berlin. On several occasions the prospect of entering the ministry was open to him, but nothing came of it, apparently because he required a free hand in foreign affairs, and this the king was not prepared to give him. When an acute crisis arose out of the refusal of parliament, in 1862, to vote the money required for the reorganization of the army, which the king and Roon had carried through, he was summoned to Berlin; but the king was still unable to make up his mind to appoint him, although he felt that Bismarck was the only man who had the courage and capacity for conducting the struggle with parliament. He was, therefore, in June, made ambassador at Paris as a temporary expedient. There he had the opportunity for renewing the good understanding with Napoleon which had been begun in 1857. He also paid a short visit to England, but it does not appear that this had any political results. In September the parliament, by a large majority, threw out the budget, and the king, having nowhere else to turn for help, at Roon’s advice summoned Bismarck to Berlin and appointed him minister president and foreign minister.
The change in government that followed the establishment of a regency in 1857 made it necessary to appoint a new envoy in Frankfurt, and in 1858, Bismarck was appointed ambassador to St. Petersburg, where he stayed for four years. During this time, he learned some Russian and earned the warm support of the tsar and the dowager-empress, who was a Prussian princess. In the first two years, he had little influence over the Prussian government; the Liberal ministers were wary of his known views on parliamentary governance, and the prince regent was offended by Bismarck’s openness to an alliance with the Italians and his disregard for the rights of other princes. The failure of the ministry and the growing distance between King William and the Liberal party opened the door for him to gain power. Roon, appointed minister of war in 1861, was an old friend, and through him, Bismarck was kept well-informed about events in Berlin. Several times, the chance to enter the ministry arose, but nothing came of it because he wanted a free hand in foreign affairs, which the king was unwilling to grant. When a serious crisis erupted in 1862 due to parliament's refusal to approve the funds needed for army reorganization, which had been pushed by the king and Roon, he was called to Berlin. However, the king still hesitated to appoint him, even though he recognized that Bismarck was the only one with the guts and skill to handle the conflict with parliament. Therefore, in June, Bismarck was temporarily made ambassador to Paris. There he had the chance to restore the good relations with Napoleon that had started in 1857. He also took a short trip to England, but that doesn't seem to have led to any political outcomes. In September, parliament rejected the budget by a wide margin, and with no other options, the king, on Roon’s advice, summoned Bismarck to Berlin and appointed him minister president and foreign minister.
Bismarck’s duty as minister was to carry on the government against the wishes of the lower house, so as to enable the king to complete and maintain the reorganized army. The opposition of the House was supported by the country Ministry. and by a large party at court, including the queen and crown prince. The indignation which his appointment caused was intense; he was known only by the reputation which in his early years he had won as a violent ultra-Conservative, and the apprehensions were increased by his first speech, in which he said that the German question could not be settled by speeches and parliamentary decrees, but only by blood and iron. His early fall was predicted, and it was feared that he might bring down the monarchy with him. Standing almost alone he succeeded in the task he had undertaken. For four years he ruled without a budget, taking advantage of an omission in the constitution which did not specify what was to happen in case the crown and the two Houses could not agree on a budget. The conflict of the ministers and the House assumed at times the form of bitter personality hostility; in 1863 the ministers refused any longer to attend the sittings, and Bismarck challenged Virchow, one of his strongest opponents, to a duel, which, however, did not take place. In 1852 he had fought a duel with pistols against Georg von Vindre, a political opponent. In June 1863, as soon as parliament had risen, Bismarck published ordinances controlling the liberty of the press, which, though in accordance with the letter, seemed opposed to the intentions of the constitution, and it was on this occasion that the crown prince, hitherto a silent opponent, publicly dissociated himself from the policy of his father’s ministers. Bismarck depended for his position solely on the confidence of the king, and the necessity for defending himself against the attempts to destroy this confidence added greatly to the suspiciousness of his nature. He was, however, really indispensable, for his resignation must be followed by a Liberal ministry, parliamentary control over the army, and probably the abdication of the king. Not only, therefore, was he secure in the continuance of the king’s support, but he had also the complete control of foreign affairs. Thus he could afford to ignore the criticism of the House, and the king was obliged to acquiesce in the policy of a minister to whom he owed so much.
Bismarck’s role as minister was to carry on the government despite the lower house's opposition, so the king could finish and maintain the reorganized army. The House’s resistance was backed by public opinion and a significant faction at court, including the queen and crown prince. The outrage over his appointment was strong; he was known only for his reputation as a staunch ultra-Conservative in his early years, and concerns grew after his first speech, where he claimed that the German question couldn’t be resolved through speeches and parliamentary decisions, but only through blood and iron. Many predicted his early downfall, fearing he might take the monarchy down with him. Almost alone, he managed to accomplish the task he set out to do. For four years, he governed without a budget, exploiting a gap in the constitution that didn’t clarify what to do if the crown and the two Houses couldn’t agree on a budget. The conflicts between the ministers and the House sometimes turned personal; in 1863, ministers stopped attending sessions, and Bismarck even challenged Virchow, one of his fiercest opponents, to a duel, which, however, never happened. In 1852, he had fought a duel with pistols against Georg von Vindre, another political adversary. In June 1863, as soon as parliament adjourned, Bismarck introduced ordinances that restricted press freedom, which although technically constitutional, seemed to go against the spirit of the constitution. It was during this time that the crown prince, previously a quiet critic, publicly distanced himself from his father’s ministers. Bismarck’s position relied entirely on the king’s trust, and the need to protect that trust made him increasingly secretive. However, he was truly indispensable, as his resignation would likely lead to a Liberal ministry, parliamentary control over the army, and probably the king’s abdication. Therefore, not only was he secure in the king’s ongoing support, but he also held complete control over foreign affairs. This allowed him to largely disregard the House’s criticisms, and the king had no choice but to go along with the policy of a minister to whom he owed so much.
He soon gave to the policy of the monarchy a resolution which had long been wanting. When the emperor of Austria summoned a meeting of the German princes at Frankfort to discuss a reform of the confederation, Bismarck Foreign policy. insisted that the king of Prussia must not attend. He remained away, and his absence in itself made the congress unavailing. There can be no doubt that from the time he entered on office Bismarck was determined to bring to an issue the long struggle for supremacy in Germany between the house of Habsburg and the house of Hohenzollern. Before he was able to complete his preparations for this, two unforeseen occurrences completely altered the European situation, and caused the conflict to be postponed for three years. The first was the outbreak of rebellion in Poland. Bismarck, an inheritor of the older Prussian traditions, and recollecting how much of the greatness of Prussia had been gained at the expense of the Poles, offered his help to the tsar. By this he placed himself in opposition to the universal feeling of western Europe; no act of his life added so much to the repulsion with which at this time he was regarded as an enemy of liberty and right. He won, however, the gratitude of the tsar and the support of Russia, which in the next years was to be of vital service to him. Even more serious were the difficulties arising in Denmark. On the death of King Frederick VII. in 1863, Prince Frederick of Augustenburg came forward as claimant to the duchies of Schleswig and Holstein, which had hitherto been joined to the crown of Denmark. He was strongly supported by the whole German nation and by many of its princes. Bismarck, however, once more was obliged to oppose the current of national feeling, which imperiously demanded that the German duchies should be rescued from a foreign yoke. Prussia was bound by the treaty of London of 1852, which guaranteed the integrity of the Danish monarchy; to have disregarded this would have been to bring about a coalition against Germany similar to that of 1851. Moreover, he held that it would be of no advantage to Prussia to create a new German state; if Denmark were to lose the duchies, he desired that Prussia should acquire them, and to recognize the Augustenburg claims would make this impossible. His resistance to the national desire made him appear a traitor to his country. To check the agitation he turned for help to Austria; and an alliance of the two powers, so lately at variance, was formed. He then falsified all the predictions of the opposition by going to war with Denmark, not, as they had required, in support of Augustenburg, but on the ground that the king of Denmark had violated his promise not to oppress his German subjects. Austria continued to act with Prussia, and, after the defeat of the Danes, at the peace of Vienna the sovereignty of the duchies was surrendered to the two allies—the first step towards annexation by Prussia. There is no part of Bismarck’s diplomatic work which deserves such careful study as these 7 events. Watched as he was by countless enemies at home and abroad, a single false step would have brought ruin and disgrace on himself; the growing national excitement would have burst through all restraint, and again, as fifteen years before, Germany divided and unorganized would have had to capitulate to the orders of foreign powers (see Schleswig-Holstein Question).
He soon provided a resolution to the monarchy's policy that had been needed for a long time. When the emperor of Austria called a meeting of the German princes in Frankfurt to discuss reforming the confederation, Bismarck Foreign relations. insisted that the king of Prussia should not attend. He stayed away, and his absence alone rendered the congress ineffective. There’s no doubt that from the moment he took office, Bismarck was determined to resolve the long-standing struggle for dominance in Germany between the House of Habsburg and the House of Hohenzollern. Before he could finalize his preparations, though, two unexpected events dramatically changed the European landscape and delayed the conflict for three years. The first was the outbreak of a rebellion in Poland. Bismarck, who inherited the older Prussian traditions and remembered how much of Prussia’s greatness had come at the Poles' expense, offered his assistance to the tsar. This put him at odds with the widespread sentiment in Western Europe; no action in his life contributed more to the disdain with which he was viewed as an enemy of freedom and justice. However, he gained the tsar's gratitude and Russia’s support, which would prove crucial in the coming years. Even more concerning were the challenges that arose in Denmark. After King Frederick VII died in 1863, Prince Frederick of Augustenburg emerged as the contender for the duchies of Schleswig and Holstein, which had previously been associated with the Danish crown. He was strongly backed by the entire German nation and many of its princes. However, Bismarck once again had to resist the wave of national sentiment demanding that the German duchies be liberated from foreign control. Prussia was bound by the Treaty of London of 1852, which guaranteed the integrity of the Danish monarchy; ignoring this would have led to a coalition against Germany similar to the one in 1851. Moreover, he believed it wouldn’t benefit Prussia to create a new German state; if Denmark were to lose the duchies, he wanted Prussia to take them, and recognizing the Augustenburg claims would make this impossible. His opposition to the national desire made him seem like a traitor to his country. To quell the unrest, he sought help from Austria, and an alliance between the two recently conflicting powers was formed. Then he defied all predictions from the opposition by going to war with Denmark, not, as they demanded, in support of Augustenburg, but on the grounds that the king of Denmark had broken his promise not to oppress his German subjects. Austria continued to collaborate with Prussia, and after the Danish defeat, at the Peace of Vienna, the sovereignty of the duchies was ceded to the two allies—the first step toward their annexation by Prussia. There’s no part of Bismarck’s diplomatic efforts that warrants closer examination than these 7 events. Watched closely by numerous enemies at home and abroad, a single misstep could have led to his ruin and disgrace; the rising national fervor could have overwhelmed all restraint, and once again, as fifteen years prior, Germany, divided and disorganized, would have had to surrender to the demands of foreign powers (see Schleswig-Holstein Question).
The peace of Vienna left him once more free to return to his older policy. For the next eighteen months he was occupied in preparing for war with Austria. For this war the was alone responsible; he undertook it deliberately War with Austria. as the only means of securing Prussian ascendancy in Germany. The actual cause of dispute was the disposition of the conquered duchies, for Austria now wished to put Augustenburg in as duke, a plan to which Bismarck would not assent. In 1865 a provisional arrangement was made by the treaty of Gastein, for Bismarck was not yet ready. He would not risk a war unless he was certain of success, and for this he required the alliance of Italy and French support; both he secured during the next year. In October 1865 he visited Napoleon at Biarritz and Paris. No formal treaty was made, but Napoleon promised to regard favourably an extension of Prussian power in Germany; while Bismarck led the emperor to believe that Prussia would help him in extending the frontier of France. A treaty of alliance with Italy was arranged in the spring of 1866; and Bismarck then with much difficulty overcame the reluctance of the king to embark in a war with his old ally. The results of the war entirely justified his calculations. Prussia, though opposed by all the German states except a few principalities in the north, completely defeated all her enemies, and at the end of a few weeks the whole of Germany lay at her feet.
The peace of Vienna once again allowed him to return to his previous strategy. For the next eighteen months, he focused on preparing for war with Austria. He took full responsibility for this conflict; he deliberately initiated it as the only way to secure Prussian dominance in Germany. The main issue at stake was the fate of the conquered duchies, as Austria wanted to install Augustenburg as duke, which Bismarck would not agree to. In 1865, a temporary arrangement was made through the treaty of Gastein, as Bismarck was not yet ready. He wouldn't risk going to war unless he was confident of victory, which required the backing of Italy and support from France; he secured both over the following year. In October 1865, he visited Napoleon in Biarritz and Paris. No formal treaty was signed, but Napoleon agreed to look favorably on the expansion of Prussian influence in Germany, while Bismarck led the emperor to think that Prussia would assist in extending France's borders. In the spring of 1866, an alliance treaty with Italy was arranged, and Bismarck then managed, with great difficulty, to persuade the king to go to war against his former ally. The outcomes of the war fully validated his plans. Prussia, despite facing opposition from nearly all the German states except a few northern principalities, completely defeated all of her foes, and within a matter of weeks, all of Germany lay at her mercy.
The war of 1866 is more than that of 1870 the crisis of modern German history. It finally settled the controversy which had begun more than a hundred years before, and left Prussia the dominant power in Germany. It determined Settlement of 1866. that the unity of Germany should be brought about not by revolutionary means as in 1848, not as in 1849 had been attempted by voluntary agreement of the princes, not by Austria, but by the sword of Prussia. This was the great work of Bismarck’s life; he had completed the programme foreshadowed in his early speeches, and finished the work of Frederick the Great. It is also the turning-point in Bismarck’s own life. Having secured the dominance of the crown in Prussia and of Prussia in Germany, he could afford to make a reconciliation with the parties which had been his chief opponents, and turn to them for help in building up a new Germany. The settlement of 1866 was peculiarly his work. We must notice, first, how in arranging the terms of peace he opposed the king and the military party who wished to advance on Vienna and annex part of Austrian Silesia; with greater foresight he looked to renewing the old friendship with Austria, and insisted (even with the threat of resignation) that no territory should be demanded. The southern states he treated with equal moderation, and thereby was able to arrange an offensive and defensive alliance with them. On the other hand, in order to secure the complete control of North Germany, which was his immediate object, he required that the whole of Hanover, Hesse-Cassel, Hesse-Nassau and the city of Frankfort, as well as the Elbe duchies, should be absorbed in Prussia. He then formed a separate confederation of the North German states, but did not attempt to unite the whole of Germany, partly because of the internal difficulties which this would have produced, partly because it would have brought about a war with France. In the new confederation he became sole responsible minister, with the title Bundes-Kanzler; this position he held till 1890, in addition to his former post of premier minister. In 1871 the title was altered to Reichs-Kanzler.
The war of 1866 is more significant than that of 1870 in the context of modern German history. It ultimately resolved a debate that had started over a hundred years earlier and established Prussia as the leading power in Germany. It confirmed that German unity would not be achieved through revolutionary methods like in 1848, nor through the voluntary agreement of the princes as attempted in 1849, nor by Austria, but through the military strength of Prussia. This was Bismarck’s major accomplishment; he accomplished the goals outlined in his early speeches and completed the work of Frederick the Great. It also marked a turning point in Bismarck’s life. With the supremacy of the Prussian crown confirmed and Prussia dominant in Germany, he was able to reconcile with the parties that had previously opposed him and seek their support in establishing a new Germany. The settlement of 1866 was distinctly his achievement. First, it's important to note how he opposed the king and the military faction when they wanted to invade Vienna and annex part of Austrian Silesia; instead, with greater foresight, he aimed to revive the old friendship with Austria and insisted (even threatening to resign) that no territories be claimed. He dealt with the southern states with equal restraint, which allowed him to form a strong offensive and defensive alliance with them. On the other hand, to ensure complete control over North Germany—his immediate goal—he required that all of Hanover, Hesse-Cassel, Hesse-Nassau, the city of Frankfort, and the Elbe duchies be integrated into Prussia. He then created a separate confederation of the North German states but did not try to unite all of Germany, partly due to the internal challenges this would cause and partly because it would lead to a conflict with France. In this new confederation, he became the sole responsible minister, holding the title Bundes-Kanzler; he retained this position until 1890, alongside his role as premier minister. In 1871, the title changed to Reichs-Kanzler.
The reconciliation with the Prussian parliament he effected by bringing in a bill of indemnity for the money which had been spent without leave of parliament. The Radicals still continued their opposition, but he thereby made possible the formation of a large party of moderate Liberals, who thenceforward supported him in his new Nationalist policy. He aslo, in the constitution for the new confederation, introduced a parliament (Bundestag) elected by universal suffrage. This was the chief demand of the revolutionists in 1848; it was one to which in his early life he had been strongly opposed. His experience at Frankfort had diminished his dislike of popular representation, and it was probably to the advice of Lassalle that his adoption of universal suffrage was due. He first publicly proposed it just before the war; by carrying it out, notwithstanding the apprehensions of many Liberal politicians, he placed the new constitution on a firmer base than would otherwise have been possible.
The reconciliation with the Prussian parliament he achieved by introducing a bill to cover the money that had been spent without parliamentary approval. The Radicals continued to oppose him, but this move allowed for the formation of a large group of moderate Liberals who then supported his new Nationalist policy. He also included a parliament (Bundestag) elected by universal suffrage in the constitution for the new confederation. This was the main demand of the revolutionaries in 1848, and it was something he had strongly opposed earlier in his life. His experiences in Frankfort had reduced his aversion to popular representation, and it was likely due to Lassalle's advice that he embraced universal suffrage. He first publicly proposed it just before the war; by implementing it, despite the concerns of many Liberal politicians, he established a stronger foundation for the new constitution than would have been possible otherwise.
Up to 1866 he had always appeared to be an opponent of the National party in Germany, now he became their leader. His next task was to complete the work which was half-finished, and it was this which brought about the second of the great wars which he undertook.
Up until 1866, he had always seemed to be against the National party in Germany, but now he became their leader. His next job was to finish the work that was only halfway done, and it was this that led to the second of the major wars he took on.
The relations with Napoleon III. form one of the most interesting but obscurest episodes in Bismarck’s career. We have seen that he did not share the common prejudice against co-operation with France. He found Napoleon Bismarck and France. willing to aid Prussia as he had aided Piedmont, and was ready to accept his assistance. There was this difference, that he asked only for neutrality, not armed assistance, and it is improbable that he ever intended to alienate any German territory; he showed himself, however, on more than one occasion, ready to discuss plans for extending French territory, on the side of Belgium and Switzerland. Napoleon, who had not anticipated the rapid success of Prussia, after the battle of Königgratz at the request of Austria came forward as mediator, and there were a few days during which it was probable that Prussia would have to meet a French attempt to dictate terms of peace. Bismarck in this crisis by deferring to the emperor in appearance avoided the danger, but he knew that he had been deceived, and the cordial understanding was never renewed. Immediately after an armistice had been arranged, Benedetti, at the orders of the French government, demanded as recompense a large tract of German territory on the left bank of the Rhine. This Bismarck peremptorily refused, declaring that he would rather have war. Benedetti then made another proposal, submitting a draft treaty by which France was to support Prussia in adding the South German states to the new confederation, and Germany was to support France in the annexation of Luxemburg and Belgium. Bismarck discussed, but did not conclude the treaty; he kept, however, a copy of the draft in Benedetti’s handwriting, and published it in The Times in the summer of 1870 so as to injure the credit of Napoleon in England. The failure of the scheme made a contest with France inevitable, at least unless the Germans were willing to forgo the purpose of completing the work of German unity, and during the next four years the two nations were each preparing for the struggle, and each watching to take the other at a disadvantage.
The relationship with Napoleon III is one of the most fascinating yet least clear episodes in Bismarck’s career. As we've seen, he didn't share the widespread bias against collaborating with France. He found Napoleon willing to help Prussia just as he had aided Piedmont, and he was open to accepting his support. The key difference was that he only requested neutrality, not military help, and it’s unlikely he ever intended to take any German land. However, he did show a willingness on several occasions to talk about plans for expanding French territory into Belgium and Switzerland. Napoleon, who hadn't expected Prussia's swift success, stepped in as a mediator at Austria's request after the battle of Königgratz, and for a few days, it seemed likely that Prussia would face a French attempt to impose peace terms. In this critical moment, Bismarck outwardly deferred to the emperor to avoid danger, but he knew he had been misled, and the friendly understanding was never restored. Right after an armistice was set up, Benedetti, acting on orders from the French government, demanded a large section of German territory along the left bank of the Rhine as compensation. Bismarck flatly refused, stating he would prefer war. Benedetti then made another suggestion, presenting a draft treaty where France would back Prussia in incorporating the South German states into the new confederation, and Germany would support France in annexing Luxembourg and Belgium. Bismarck discussed it but didn't finalize the agreement; however, he kept a copy of the draft in Benedetti’s handwriting and published it in The Times in the summer of 1870 to undermine Napoleon's reputation in England. The failure of this plan made conflict with France unavoidable, at least unless the Germans were willing to give up on their goal of achieving German unity. Over the next four years, both nations were preparing for the impending struggle, each watching for an opportunity to take the other by surprise.
It is necessary, then, to keep in mind the general situation in considering Bismarck’s conduct in the months immediately preceding the war of 1870. In 1867 there was a dispute regarding the right to garrison Luxemburg. Bismarck then produced the secret treaties with the southern states, an act which was, as it were, a challenge to France by the whole of Germany. During the next three years the Ultramontane party hoped to bring about an anti-Prussian revolution, and Napoleon was working for an alliance with Austria, where Beust, an old opponent of Bismarck’s, was chancellor. Bismarck was doubtless well informed as to the progress of the negotiations, for he had established intimate relations with the Hungarians. The pressure at home for completing the work of German unity was so strong that he could with difficulty resist it, and in 1870 he was much embarrassed by a request from Baden to be admitted to the confederation, which he had to refuse. It is therefore not surprising that he eagerly welcomed the opportunity of gaining the goodwill of Spain, and supported by all the means in his power the offer made by Marshal Prim that Prince Leopold of Hohenzollern should be chosen king of that country. It was only by his urgent and repeated representations that the prince was persuaded against his will to accept. The negotiations were 8 carried out with the greatest secrecy, but as soon as the acceptance was made known the French government intervened and declared that the project was inadmissable. Bismarck was away at Varzin, but on his instructions the Prussian foreign office in answer to inquiries denied all knowledge or responsibility. This was necessary, because it would have caused a bad impression in Germany had he gone to war with France in support of the prince’s candidature. The king, by receiving Benedetti at Ems, departed from the policy of reserve Bismarck himself adopted, and Bismarck (who had now gone to Berlin) found himself in a position of such difficulty that he contemplated resignation. The French however, by changing and extending their demands enabled him to find a cause of war of such nature that the The Ems telegram. whole of Germany would be united against French agression. France asked for a letter of apology, and Benedetti personally requested from the king a promise that he would never allow the candidature to be resumed. Bismarck published the telegram in which this information and the refusal of the king were conveyed, but by omitting part of the telegram made it appear that the request and refusal had both been conveyed in a more abrupt form than had really been the case.1 But even apart from this, the publication of the French demand, which could not be complied with, must have brought about a war.
It’s important to consider the overall situation when looking at Bismarck’s actions in the months leading up to the 1870 war. In 1867, there was a conflict over the right to station troops in Luxembourg. Bismarck then revealed the secret treaties with the southern states, which was essentially a challenge to France from Germany as a whole. During the following three years, the Ultramontane party aimed to spark an anti-Prussian uprising, while Napoleon sought an alliance with Austria, where Beust, a former adversary of Bismarck, was serving as chancellor. Bismarck was certainly well-informed about the negotiations since he had developed close ties with the Hungarians. The push for completing German unity at home was so intense that he struggled to resist it, and in 1870, he faced a difficult situation when Baden requested to join the confederation, which he had to decline. Therefore, it’s not surprising that he eagerly seized the chance to win Spain’s favor and fully supported Marshal Prim’s proposal for Prince Leopold of Hohenzollern to become king there. It was only through his persistent efforts that the prince reluctantly agreed to accept. The negotiations were conducted with the utmost secrecy, but once the acceptance became public, the French government stepped in and declared the plan unacceptable. Bismarck was away in Varzin, but on his orders, the Prussian foreign office denied all knowledge or involvement in response to inquiries. This was crucial, as going to war with France over the prince’s candidacy would have sparked negative sentiment in Germany. The king's meeting with Benedetti at Ems marked a departure from the reserved approach Bismarck preferred, and upon returning to Berlin, Bismarck found himself in such a tricky position that he thought about stepping down. However, the French, by altering and broadening their demands, gave him a justification for a war that would unite all of Germany against French aggression. France requested a letter of apology, and Benedetti personally asked the king for a guarantee that he wouldn’t allow the candidacy to be revived. Bismarck published the telegram that contained this request and the king's refusal, but by leaving out parts of it, he made it seem as if both the request and the refusal were more abrupt than they actually were. But even beyond this manipulation, the release of the French demand, which could not be met, was bound to lead to war.
In the campaign of 1870-71 Bismarck accompanied the headquarters of the army, as he had done in 1866. He was present at the battle of Gravelotte and at the surrender of Sedan, and it was on the morning of the 2nd of September that he had his famous meeting with Napoleon after the surrender of the emperor. He accompanied the king to Paris, and spent many months at Versailles. Here he was occupied chiefly with the arrangments for admitting the southern states to the confederation, and the establishment of the empire. He also underwent much anxiety lest the efforts of Thiers to bring about an interference by the neutral powers might be successful. He had to carry on the negotiations with the French preliminary to the surrender of Paris, and to enforce upon them the German terms of peace.
In the campaign of 1870-71, Bismarck joined the army headquarters, just like he did in 1866. He was at the battle of Gravelotte and witnessed the surrender at Sedan. It was on the morning of September 2nd that he had his famous meeting with Napoleon after the emperor surrendered. He went with the king to Paris and spent several months at Versailles. There, he mainly focused on arranging the admission of the southern states to the confederation and setting up the empire. He also worried a lot about Thiers' attempts to get neutral powers involved and feared they might succeed. He had to handle negotiations with the French leading up to the surrender of Paris and insist on the German terms of peace.
For Bismarck’s political career after 1870 we must refer to the article Germany, for he was thenceforward entirely absorbed in the affairs of his country. The foreign policy he controlled absolutely. As chancellor he was responsible After 1870. for the whole internal policy of the empire, and his influence is to be seen in every department of state, especially, however, in the great change of policy after 1878. During the earlier period the estrangement from the Conservatives, which had begun in 1866, became very marked, and brought about a violent quarrel with many of his old friends, which culminated in the celebrated Arnim trial. He incurred much criticism during the struggle with the Roman Catholic Church, and in 1873 he was shot at and slightly wounded by a youth called Rullmann, who professed to be an adherent of the Clerical party. Once before, in 1866, just before the outbreak of war, his life had been attempted by a young man called Cohen, a native of Württemberg, who wished to save Germany from a fratricidal war. In 1872 he retired from the presidency of the Prussian ministry, but returned after a few months. On several occasions he offered to retire, but the emperor always refused his consent, on the last time with the word “Never.” In 1877 he took a long leave of absence for ten months. His health at this time was very bad. In 1878 he presided over the congress of Berlin. The following years were chiefly occupied, besides foreign affairs, which were always his first care, with important commercial reforms, and he held at this time also the office of Prussian minister of trade in addition to his other posts. During this period his relations with the Reichstag were often very unsatisfactory, and at no time did he resort so freely to prosecutions in the law-courts in order to injure his opponents, so that the expression Bismarck-Beleidigung was invented. He was engaged at this time in a great struggle with the Social-Democrats, whom he tried to crush by exceptional penal laws. The death of the emperor William in 1888 made a serious difference in his position. He had been bound to him by a long term of loyal service, which had been rewarded with equal loyalty. For his relations to the emperors Frederick and William II., and for the events connected with his dismissal from office in March 1890, we must refer to the articles under those names.
For Bismarck’s political career after 1870, we need to look at the article Germany, as he became completely focused on his country's affairs. He had total control over foreign policy. As chancellor, he was responsible for the entire internal policy of the empire, and his influence is evident in every department of state, especially during the major policy shift after 1878. During the earlier period, the divide between him and the Conservatives, which started in 1866, became very pronounced, leading to a fierce conflict with many of his former friends, culminating in the famous Arnim trial. He faced a lot of criticism during the struggle with the Roman Catholic Church, and in 1873, a young man named Rullmann, who claimed to be part of the Clerical party, attempted to assassinate him, resulting in a minor injury. Earlier, in 1866, just before the war broke out, another man named Cohen, a native of Württemberg, also tried to kill him, believing he was preventing a civil war in Germany. In 1872, he stepped down from the presidency of the Prussian ministry but returned after a few months. He offered to resign several times, but the emperor always denied his request, the last time with a firm “Never.” In 1877, he took a long leave of absence for ten months due to poor health. In 1878, he chaired the Berlin congress. The following years were mostly spent on foreign affairs, which were always his priority, along with important commercial reforms; during this time, he also held the role of Prussian minister of trade alongside his other responsibilities. His relationship with the Reichstag during this period was often quite poor, and he frequently turned to the courts to bring legal action against his opponents, leading to the term Bismarck-Beleidigung being coined. During this time, he was engaged in a significant battle against the Social-Democrats, whom he attempted to suppress using strict penal laws. The death of Emperor William in 1888 significantly affected his position. He had served him loyally for a long time, and this loyalty had been reciprocated. For details about his relationships with Emperors Frederick and William II., as well as the events surrounding his dismissal in March 1890, we must refer to the articles under those names.
After his retirement he resided at Friedrichsruh, near Hamburg, a house on his Leuenburg estates. His criticisms of the government, given sometimes in conversation, sometimes in the columns of the Hamburger Nachrichten, caused an open breach between him and the emperor; and the new chancellor, Count Caprivi, in a circular despatch which was afterwards published, warned all German envoys that no real importance must be attached to what he said. When he visited Vienna for his son’s wedding the German ambassador, Prince Reuss, was forbidden to take any notice of him. A reconciliation was effected in 1893. In 1895 his eightieth birthday was celebrated with great enthusiasm: the Reichstag alone, owing to the opposition of the Clericals and the Socialists, refused to vote an address. In 1891 he had been elected a member of the Reichstag, but he never took his seat. He died at Friedrichsruh on the 31st of July 1898.
After he retired, he lived in Friedrichsruh, near Hamburg, a house on his Leuenburg estates. His criticisms of the government, sometimes shared in conversation and other times in the columns of the Hamburger Nachrichten, led to a noticeable rift between him and the emperor. The new chancellor, Count Caprivi, in a circular dispatch that was later published, warned all German envoys that they shouldn’t take his words seriously. When he went to Vienna for his son's wedding, the German ambassador, Prince Reuss, was instructed not to acknowledge him. A reconciliation happened in 1893. In 1895, his eightieth birthday was celebrated with great enthusiasm: the Reichstag, however, refused to support an address due to opposition from the Clericals and the Socialists. He had been elected to the Reichstag in 1891 but never took his seat. He passed away in Friedrichsruh on July 31, 1898.
Bismarck was made a count in 1865; in 1871 he received the rank of Fürst (prince). On his retirement the emperor created him duke of Lauenburg, but he never used the title, which was not inherited by his son. In 1866 he received £60,000 as his share of the donation voted by the Reichstag for the victorious generals. With this he purchased the estate of Varzin in Pomerania, which henceforth he used as a country residence in preference to Schönhausen. In 1871 the emperor presented him with a large part of the domains of the duchy of Lauenburg. On his seventieth birthday a large sum of money (£270,000) was raised by public subscription, of which half was devoted to repurchasing the estate of Schönhausen for him, and the rest was used by him to establish a fund for the assistance of schoolmasters. As a young man he was an officer in the Landwehr and militia, and in addition to his civil honours he was eventually raised to the rank of general. Among the numerous orders he received we may mention that he was the first Protestant on whom the pope bestowed the order of Christ; this was done after the cessation of the Kulturkampf and the reference of the dispute with Spain concerning the Caroline Islands to the arbitration of the pope.
Bismarck was made a count in 1865; in 1871 he was given the title of Fürst (prince). Upon his retirement, the emperor made him duke of Lauenburg, but he never used the title, and it wasn’t passed down to his son. In 1866, he received £60,000 as his share of the donation approved by the Reichstag for the victorious generals. He used this money to buy the estate of Varzin in Pomerania, which he preferred as a country residence over Schönhausen. In 1871, the emperor gave him a large part of the lands of the duchy of Lauenburg. On his seventieth birthday, a significant amount of money (£270,000) was raised through public donations, with half going towards repurchasing the Schönhausen estate for him and the rest funding a program to assist schoolteachers. As a young man, he served as an officer in the Landwehr and militia, and in addition to his civilian honors, he eventually achieved the rank of general. Among the many awards he received, he was the first Protestant to be granted the order of Christ by the pope; this happened after the end of the Kulturkampf and the resolution of the dispute with Spain over the Caroline Islands through the pope's arbitration.
Bismarck’s wife died in 1894. He left one daughter and two sons. Herbert (1840-1904), the elder, was wounded at Mars-le-Tour, afterwards entered the foreign office, and acted as private secretary to his father (1871-1881). In 1882 he became councillor to the embassy at London, in 1884 was transferred to St Petersburg, and in 1885 became under-secretary of state for foreign affairs. In 1884 he had been elected to the Reichstag, but had to resign his seat when, in 1886, he was made secretary of state for foreign affairs and Prussian minister. He conducted many of the negotiations with Great Britain on colonial affairs. He retired in 1890 at the same time as his father, and in 1893 was again elected to the Reichstag. He married Countess Margarete Hoyos in 1892, and died on the 18th of September 1904. He left two daughters and three sons, of whom the eldest, Otto Christian Archibald (b. 1897), succeeded to the princely title. The second son, Wilhelm, who was president of the province of Prussia, died in 1901. By his wife, Sybilla von Arnim-Kröchlendorff, he left three daughters and a son, Count Nikolaus (b. 1896).
Bismarck's wife passed away in 1894. He had one daughter and two sons. Herbert (1840-1904), the elder son, was injured at Mars-le-Tour, later joined the foreign office, and served as his father's private secretary from 1871 to 1881. In 1882, he became a councillor to the embassy in London, was moved to St Petersburg in 1884, and became under-secretary of state for foreign affairs in 1885. He was elected to the Reichstag in 1884 but had to give up his seat in 1886 when he was appointed secretary of state for foreign affairs and Prussian minister. He handled many negotiations with Great Britain regarding colonial issues. He retired in 1890 alongside his father and was re-elected to the Reichstag in 1893. He married Countess Margarete Hoyos in 1892 and died on September 18, 1904. He had two daughters and three sons, with the eldest, Otto Christian Archibald (b. 1897), inheriting the princely title. The second son, Wilhelm, who was the president of the province of Prussia, died in 1901. With his wife, Sybilla von Arnim-Kröchlendorff, he had three daughters and a son, Count Nikolaus (b. 1896).
Authorities.—The literature on Bismarck’s life is very extensive, and it is only possible to enumerate a few of the most important books. The first place belongs to his own works. These include his own memoirs, published after his death, under the title Gedanken und Erinnerungen; there is an English translation, Bismarck: his Reflections and Reminiscences (London, 1898). They are incomplete, but contain very valuable discussions on particular points. The speeches are of the greatest importance both for his character and for political history; of the numerous editions that by Horst Kehl, in 9 12 vols. (Stuttgart, 1892-1894), is the best; there is a cheap edition in Reclam’s Universalbibliothek. Bismarck was an admirable letter-writer, and numbers of his private letters have been published; a collected edition has been brought out by Horst Kohl. His letters to his wife were published by Prince Herbert Bismarck (Stuttgart, 1900). A translation of a small selection of the private letters was published in 1876 by F. Maxse. Of great value for the years 1851-1858 is the corrspondence with General L. v. Gerlach, which has been edited by Horst Kohl (3rd ed., Berlin, 1893). A selection of the political letters was also published under the title Politische Briefe aus den Jahren 1849-1899 (2nd ed., Berlin, 1890). Of far greater importance are the collections of despatches and state papers edited by Herr v. Poschinger. These include four volumes entitled Preussen im Bundestag, 1851-1859 (4 vols., Leipzig, 1882-1885), which contain his despatches during the time he was at Frankfort. Next in importance are two works, Bismarck als Volkswirth and Aktenstucke zur Wirthschaftspolitik des Fursten Bismarck, which are part of the collection of state papers, Akenstucke zur Geschichte der Wirthschaftspolitik in Preussen. They contain full information on Bismarck’s commercial policy, including a number of important state papers. A useful general collection is that by Ludwig Hahn, Bismarck, sein politisches Leben, &c. (5 vols., Berlin, 1878-1891), which includes a selection from letters, speeches and newspaper articles. These collections have only been possible owing to the extreme generosity which Bismarck showed in permitting the publication of documents; he always professed to have no secrets. A full account of the diplomatic history from 1863 to 1866 is given by Sybel in Die Begrundung des deutschen Reichs (Munich, 1889-1894), written with the help of the Prussian archives. The last two volumes, covering 1866-1870, are of less value, as he was not able to use the archives for this period. Poschinger has also edited a series of works in which anecdotes, minutes of interviews and conversations are recorded; they are, however, of very unequal value. They are Bismarck und die Parlamentarier, Furst Bismarck und der Bundesrath, Die Ansprache des Fursten Bismarck, Neue Tischgesprache, and Bismarck und die Diplomaten. Selections from these have been published in English by Charles Lowe, The Tabletalk of Prince Bismarck, and by Sidney Whitman, Conversations with Bismarck. By far the fullest guide to Bismarck’s life is Horst Kohl’s Furst Bismarck, Regesten zu einer wissenschaftlichen Biographie (Leipzig, 1891-1892), which contains a record of Bismarck’s actions on each day, with references to and extracts from his letters and speeches. For the works of Moritz Busch, which contain graphic pictures of his daily life, see the article Busch. Further materials were published periodically in the Bismarck-Jahrbuch, edited by Horst Kohl (Berlin, 1894-1896; Stuttgart, 1897-1899). Herr v. Poschinger also brought out a Bismarck Portfeuille. Of German biographies may be mentioned Hans Blum, Bismarck und seine Zeit (6 vols., Munich, 1894-1895), with a volume of appendices, &c. (1898); Heyck, Bismarck (Bielefeld, 1898); Kreutzer, Otto von Bismarck (2 vols., Leipzig, 1900); Klein-Hattingen, Bismarck und seine Welt, 1815-1871, Bd. i. (Berlin, 1902); Lenz, Geschichte Bismarcks (Leipzig, 1902); Penzler, Furst Bismarck nach seiner Entlassung (7 vols., ib. 1897-1898); Liman, one volume under the same title (ib. 1901). There are English biographies by Charles Lowe, Bismarck, a Political Biography (revised edition in 1 vol., 1895), by James Headlam (1899), and by F. Stearns (Philadelphia, 1900). A useful bibliography of all works on Bismarck up to 1895 is Paul Schulze and Otto Koller’s Bismarck-Literatur (Leipzig, 1896).
Authorities.—The writing about Bismarck’s life is quite extensive, and it's possible to mention only a few of the most significant books. At the top is his own work, including his memoirs published posthumously under the title Gedanken und Erinnerungen; there's an English translation titled Bismarck: his Reflections and Reminiscences (London, 1898). Though incomplete, they provide valuable insights on specific topics. His speeches are crucial for understanding both his character and political history; among the various editions, the one by Horst Kehl in 9 12 volumes (Stuttgart, 1892-1894) is the best, with a more affordable edition available in Reclam’s Universalbibliothek. Bismarck was an excellent letter writer, and many of his private letters have been published; a collected edition has been released by Horst Kohl. His letters to his wife were published by Prince Herbert Bismarck (Stuttgart, 1900). A selection of his private letters was translated and published in 1876 by F. Maxse. A valuable collection for the years 1851-1858 is the correspondence with General L. v. Gerlach, edited by Horst Kohl (3rd ed., Berlin, 1893). Another selection of his political letters was published under the title Politische Briefe aus den Jahren 1849-1899 (2nd ed., Berlin, 1890). Far more significant are the collections of dispatches and state papers edited by Herr v. Poschinger. This includes four volumes titled Preussen im Bundestag, 1851-1859 (4 vols., Leipzig, 1882-1885), which contain his dispatches from when he was in Frankfurt. Following closely are two works, Bismarck als Volkswirth and Aktenstucke zur Wirthschaftspolitik des Fursten Bismarck, which are included in the collection of state papers, Akenstucke zur Geschichte der Wirthschaftspolitik in Preussen. They contain comprehensive details on Bismarck’s commercial policy along with several important state documents. A useful general collection is that by Ludwig Hahn, Bismarck, sein politisches Leben, & c. (5 vols., Berlin, 1878-1891), which features selections from letters, speeches, and newspaper articles. These collections have been made possible thanks to Bismarck’s remarkable generosity in allowing document publication; he always maintained that he had no secrets. A thorough account of the diplomatic history from 1863 to 1866 can be found in Sybel’s Die Begrundung des deutschen Reichs (Munich, 1889-1894), based on the Prussian archives. The last two volumes, covering 1866-1870, are less valuable as he couldn't access the archives for this period. Poschinger has also edited a series of works documenting anecdotes, minutes of interviews, and conversations; however, their value varies significantly. They include Bismarck und die Parlamentarier, Furst Bismarck und der Bundesrath, Die Ansprache des Fursten Bismarck, Neue Tischgesprache, and Bismarck und die Diplomaten. Selections from these have been published in English by Charles Lowe as The Tabletalk of Prince Bismarck, and by Sidney Whitman as Conversations with Bismarck. The most comprehensive guide to Bismarck’s life is Horst Kohl’s Furst Bismarck, Regesten zu einer wissenschaftlichen Biographie (Leipzig, 1891-1892), which records his actions day by day, including references and excerpts from his letters and speeches. For Moritz Busch's works, which vividly portray his daily life, see the article Busch. Additional materials appeared periodically in the Bismarck-Jahrbuch, edited by Horst Kohl (Berlin, 1894-1896; Stuttgart, 1897-1899). Herr v. Poschinger also released a Bismarck Portfeuille. For German biographies, notable mentions include Hans Blum’s Bismarck und seine Zeit (6 vols., Munich, 1894-1895), with a volume of appendices, & c. (1898); Heyck’s Bismarck (Bielefeld, 1898); Kreutzer’s Otto von Bismarck (2 vols., Leipzig, 1900); Klein-Hattingen’s Bismarck und seine Welt, 1815-1871, Vol. I (Berlin, 1902); Lenz’s Geschichte Bismarcks (Leipzig, 1902); Penzler’s Furst Bismarck nach seiner Entlassung (7 vols., ib. 1897-1898); Liman’s single volume under the same title (ib. 1901). English biographies include Charles Lowe's Bismarck, a Political Biography (revised edition in 1 vol., 1895), James Headlam’s (1899), and F. Stearns’ (Philadelphia, 1900). A helpful bibliography of all works on Bismarck published up to 1895 is Paul Schulze and Otto Koller’s Bismarck-Literatur (Leipzig, 1896).
1 It was not till many years later that our knowledge of these events (which is still incomplete) was established; in 1894 the publication of the memoirs of the king of Rumania showed, what had hitherto been denied, that Bismarck had taken a leading part in urging the election of the prince of Hohenzollern. It was in 1892 that the language used by Bismarck himself made it necessary for the German government to publish the original form of the Ems telegram.
1 It wasn't until many years later that our understanding of these events (which is still incomplete) was confirmed; in 1894, the publication of the memoirs of the king of Romania revealed, what had previously been denied, that Bismarck had played a key role in pushing for the election of the prince of Hohenzollern. It was in 1892 that the wording used by Bismarck himself made it necessary for the German government to release the original version of the Ems telegram.
BISMARCK, the capital of North Dakota, U.S.A., and the county-seat of Burleigh county, on the E. bank of the Missouri river, in the S. central part of the state. Pop. (1890) 2186, (1900) 3319, of whom 746 were foreign-born, (1905) 4913, (1910) 5443. It is on the main line of the Northern Pacific, and on the Minneapolis, St Paul & Sault Ste Marie railways; and steamboats run from here to Mannhaven, Mercer county, and Fort Yates, Morton county. The city is about 1650 ft. above sea-level. It contains the state capitol, the state penitentiary, a U.S. land office, a U.S. surveyor-general’s office, a U.S. Indian school and a U.S. weather station; about a mile S. of the city is Fort Lincoln, a United States army post. Bismarck is the headquarters for navigation of the upper Missouri river, is situated in a good agricultural region, and has a large wholesale trade, shipping grain, hides, furs, wool and coal. It was founded in 1873, and was chartered as a city in 1876; from 1883 to 1889 it was the capital of Dakota Territory, on the division of which it became the capital of North Dakota.
Bismarck, is the capital of North Dakota, U.S.A., and the county seat of Burleigh County, located on the east bank of the Missouri River in the south-central part of the state. Population: (1890) 2,186, (1900) 3,319, of which 746 were foreign-born, (1905) 4,913, (1910) 5,443. It's on the main line of the Northern Pacific and the Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie railroads; steamboats operate from here to Mannhaven in Mercer County and Fort Yates in Morton County. The city is about 1,650 feet above sea level. It houses the state capitol, the state penitentiary, a U.S. land office, a U.S. surveyor general's office, a U.S. Indian school, and a U.S. weather station. About a mile south of the city is Fort Lincoln, a U.S. Army post. Bismarck serves as the headquarters for navigation on the upper Missouri River, is located in a good agricultural area, and has a large wholesale trade, shipping grain, hides, furs, wool, and coal. It was founded in 1873 and was chartered as a city in 1876; from 1883 to 1889, it was the capital of the Dakota Territory, and after the division, it became the capital of North Dakota.
BISMARCK ARCHIPELAGO, the collective name of a large number of islands lying N. and N.E. of New Guinea, between 1° and 7° S., and 146° and 153° E., belonging to Germany. The largest island is New Pomerania, and the archipelago also includes New Mecklenburg, New Hanover, with small attendant islands, the Admiralty Islands and a chain of islands off the coast of New Guinea, the whole system lying in the form of a great amphitheatre of oval shape. The archipelago was named in honour of the first chancellor of the German empire, after a German protectorate had been declared in 1884. (See Admiralty Islands, New Mecklenburg, New Pomerania, New Guinea.)
Bismarck Archipelago, the collective name for a large group of islands located to the north and northeast of New Guinea, between 1° and 7° S., and 146° and 153° E., which belong to Germany. The largest island is New Pomerania, and the archipelago also includes New Mecklenburg, New Hanover, along with small nearby islands, the Admiralty Islands, and a chain of islands off the coast of New Guinea, all arranged in a large oval amphitheater shape. The archipelago was named to honor the first chancellor of the German empire after a German protectorate was established in 1884. (See Admiralty Islands, New Mecklenburg, New Pomerania, New Guinea.)
BISMUTH, a metallic chemical element; symbol Bi, atomic weight 208.5 (O = 16). It was probably unknown to the Greeks and Romans, but during the middle ages it became quite familiar, notwithstanding its frequent confusion with other metals. In 1450 Basil Valentine referred to it by the name “wismut,” and characterized it as a metal; some years later Paracelsus termed it “wissmat,” and, in allusion to its brittle nature, affirmed it to be a “bastard” or “half-metal”; Georgius Agricola used the form “wissmuth,” latinized to “bisemutum,” and also the term “plumbum cineareum.” Its elementary nature was imperfectly understood; and the impure specimens obtained by the early chemists explain, in some measure, its confusion with tin, lead, antimony, zinc and other metals; in 1595 Andreas Libavius confused it with antimony, and in 1675 Nicolas Lemery with zinc. These obscurities began to be finally cleared up with the researches of Johann Heinrich Pott (1692-1777), a pupil of Stahl, published in his Exercitationes chemicae de Wismutho (1769), and of N. Geoffroy, son of Claude Joseph Geoffroy, whose contribution to our knowledge of this metal appeared in the Mémoires de l’académie française for 1753. Torbern Olof Bergman reinvestigated its properties and determined its reactions; his account, which was published in his Opuscula, contains the first fairly accurate description of the metal.
BISMUTH, is a metallic chemical element with the symbol Bi and an atomic weight of 208.5 (O = 16). It was likely unknown to the Greeks and Romans, but during the Middle Ages it became fairly well-known, despite often being mistaken for other metals. In 1450, Basil Valentine referred to it as “wismut” and described it as a metal. A few years later, Paracelsus called it “wissmat” and, noting its brittle nature, called it a “bastard” or “half-metal.” Georgius Agricola referred to it as “wissmuth,” which was later Latinized to “bisemutum,” and used the term “plumbum cineareum.” Its basic nature was not fully understood; the impure samples that early chemists obtained contributed to its confusion with tin, lead, antimony, zinc, and other metals. In 1595, Andreas Libavius mistook it for antimony, and in 1675, Nicolas Lemery confused it with zinc. These misunderstandings began to be resolved with the research of Johann Heinrich Pott (1692-1777), a student of Stahl, published in his Exercitationes chemicae de Wismutho (1769), and of N. Geoffroy, son of Claude Joseph Geoffroy, whose contribution to our understanding of this metal appeared in the Mémoires de l’académie française for 1753. Torbern Olof Bergman further investigated its properties and identified its reactions; his report, published in his Opuscula, features the first relatively accurate description of the metal.
Ores and Minerals.—The principal source of bismuth is the native metal, which is occasionally met with as a mineral, usually in reticulated and arborescent shapes or as foliated and granular masses with a crystalline fracture. Although bismuth is readily obtained in fine crystals by artificial means, yet natural crystals are rare and usually indistinct; they belong to the rhombohedral system and a cube-like rhombohedron with interfacial angles of 92° 20′ is the predominating form. There is a perfect cleavage perpendicular to the trigonal axis of the crystals; the fact that only two (opposite) corners of the cube-like crystals can be truncated by cleavage at once distinguishes them from true cubes. When not tarnished, the mineral has a silver-white colour with a tinge of red, and the lustre is metallic. Hardness 2-2½; specific gravity 9.70-9.83. The slight variations in specific gravity are due to the presence of small amounts of arsenic, sulphur or tellurium, or to enclosed impurities.
Ores and Minerals.—The main source of bismuth is the native metal, which can sometimes be found in mineral form, usually displaying reticulated and branched shapes or as foliated and granular masses with a crystalline fracture. While bismuth can easily be produced in fine crystals artificially, natural crystals are rare and often not well-defined; they belong to the rhombohedral system, with a cube-like rhombohedron being the most common form, having interfacial angles of 92° 20′. There is perfect cleavage perpendicular to the trigonal axis of the crystals; the unique feature that only two opposite corners of the cube-like crystals can be truncated by cleavage sets them apart from true cubes. When not tarnished, the mineral appears silver-white with a hint of red, and has a metallic luster. Hardness is between 2 and 2½; specific gravity ranges from 9.70 to 9.83. The slight differences in specific gravity are due to small amounts of arsenic, sulfur, or tellurium, or the presence of enclosed impurities.
Bismuth occurs in metalliferous veins traversing gneiss or clay-slate, and is usually associated with ores of silver and cobalt. Well-known localities are Schneeberg in Saxony and Joachimsthal in Bohemia; at the former it has been found as arborescent groups penetrating brown jasper, which material has occasionally been cut and polished for small ornaments. The mineral has been found in some Cornish mines and is fairly abundant in Bolivia (near Sorata, and at Tasna in Potosi). It is the chief commercial source of bismuth.
Bismuth is found in metal-rich veins that cut through gneiss or clay slate, and it's usually found alongside silver and cobalt ores. Notable places where it can be found include Schneeberg in Saxony and Joachimsthal in Bohemia; in Schneeberg, it has been discovered in tree-like formations within brown jasper, which has sometimes been cut and polished for small jewelry. The mineral has also been located in several Cornish mines and is quite common in Bolivia, particularly near Sorata and at Tasna in Potosi. It serves as the primary commercial source of bismuth.
The oxide, bismuth ochre, Bi2O3, and the sulphide, bismuth glance or bismuthite, are also of commercial importance. The former is found, generally mixed with iron, copper and arsenic oxides, in Bohemia, Siberia, Cornwall, France (Meymac) and other localities; it also occurs admixed with bismuth carbonate and hydrate. The hydrated carbonate, bismutite, is of less importance; it occurs in Cornwall, Bolivia, Arizona and elsewhere.
The oxide bismuth ochre, Bi2O3, and the sulfide bismuth glance or bismuthite are also commercially significant. The former is usually found mixed with iron, copper, and arsenic oxides in Bohemia, Siberia, Cornwall, France (Meymac), and various other places; it can also occur mixed with bismuth carbonate and hydrate. The hydrated carbonate, bismutite, is of lesser importance; it is found in Cornwall, Bolivia, Arizona, and other locations.
Of the rarer bismuth minerals we may notice the following:—the complex sulphides, copper bismuth glance or wittichenite, BiCu3S3, silver bismuth glance, bismuth cobalt pyrites, bismuth nickel pyrites or saynite, needle ore (patrinite or aikinite), BiCuPbS3, emplectite, CuBiS2, and kobellite, BiAsPb3S6; the sulphotelluride tetradymite; the selenide guanajuatite, Bi2Se3, 10 the basic tellurate montanite, Bi2(OH)4TeOe; the silicates eulytite and agricolite, Bi4(SiO2)3; and the urnayl arsenate walpurgite, Bi(UO2),(OH)24(A3O4)4.
Of the rarer bismuth minerals, we can point out the following: the complex sulfides, copper bismuth glance or wittichenite, BiCu3S3, silver bismuth glance, bismuth cobalt pyrites, bismuth nickel pyrites or saynite, needle ore (patrinite or aikinite), BiCuPbS3, emplectite, CuBiS2, and kobellite, BiAsPb3S6; the sulphotelluride tetradymite; the selenide guanajuatite, Bi2Se3, 10 the basic tellurate montanite, Bi2(OH)4TeOe; the silicates eulytite and agricolite, Bi4(SiO2)3; and the urnayl arsenate walpurgite, Bi(UO2),(OH)24(A3O4)4.
Metallurgy.—Bismuth is extracted from its ores by dry, wet, or electro-matallurgical methods, the choice depending upon the composition of the ore and economic conditions. The dry process is more frequently practised, for the easy reducibility of the oxide and sulphide, together with the low melting-point of the metal, renders it possible to effect a ready separation of the metal from the gangue and impurities. The extraction from ores in which the bismuth is present in the metallic condition may be accomplished by a simple liquation, or melting, in which the temperature is just sufficient to melt the bismuth, or by a complete fusion of the ore. The first process never extracts all the bisbuth, as much as one-third being retained in the matte or speiss; the second is more satisfactory, since the extraction is more complete, and also allows the addition of reducing agents to decompose any admixed bismuth oxide or sulphide. In the liquidation process the ore is heated in inclined cylindrical retorts, and the molten metal is tapped at the lower end; the residues being removed from the upper end. The fusion process is preferably carried out in crucible furnaces; shaft furnaces are unsatisfactory on account of the disintegrating action of the molten bismuth on the furnace linings.
Metallurgy.—Bismuth is extracted from its ores using dry, wet, or electro-metallurgical methods, with the choice depending on the ore's composition and economic factors. The dry process is more commonly used because the easy reducibility of the oxide and sulfide, along with the low melting point of the metal, makes it possible to easily separate the metal from the gangue and impurities. The extraction from ores where bismuth is in its metallic form can be done through a simple liquation, or melting, at a temperature just high enough to melt the bismuth, or by completely fusing the ore. The first process never extracts all the bismuth, with up to one-third being left in the matte or speiss; the second is more effective since the extraction is more thorough and allows for the addition of reducing agents to break down any mixed bismuth oxide or sulfide. In the liquation process, the ore is heated in inclined cylindrical retorts, and the molten metal is tapped from the lower end, while the residues are removed from the upper end. The fusion process is preferably done in crucible furnaces; shaft furnaces are not ideal due to the destructive effect of the molten bismuth on the furnace linings.
Sulphuretted ores are smelted, either with or without a preliminary calcination, with metallic iron; calcined ores may be smelted with carbon (coal). The reactions are strictly analogous to those which occur in the smelting of galena (see Lead), the carbon reducing any oxide, either present originally in the ore or produced in the calcination and the iron combining with the sulphur of the bismuthite. A certain amount of bismuth sulphate is always formed during the calcination; this is subsequently reduced to the sulphide and ultimately to the metal in the fusion. Calcination in reverberatory furnaces and a subsequent smelting in the same type of furnace with the addition of about 3% of coal, lime, soda and fluorspar, has been adopted for treating the Bolivian ores, which generally contain the sulphides of bismuth, copper, iron, antimony, lead and a little silver. The lowest layer of the molten mass is principally metallic bismuth, the succeeding layers are a bismuth copper matte, which is subsequently worked up, and a slag. Ores containing the oxide and carbonate are treated either by smelting with carbon or by a wet process.
Sulphide ores are smelted, either with or without a preliminary calcination, using metallic iron; calcined ores can be smelted with carbon (coal). The reactions are very similar to those that happen when smelting galena (see Lead), where the carbon reduces any oxide, whether it was originally in the ore or produced during calcination, and the iron combines with the sulfur from the bismuthite. A certain amount of bismuth sulfate is always formed during calcination; this is later reduced to sulfide and eventually to metal during the fusion. Calcination in reverberatory furnaces followed by smelting in the same type of furnace with about 3% of coal, lime, soda, and fluorspar has been used to process Bolivian ores, which usually contain sulfides of bismuth, copper, iron, antimony, lead, and a bit of silver. The lowest layer of the molten mass is mainly metallic bismuth, the layers above it consist of a bismuth copper matte that is processed further, and then there is a slag. Ores that contain oxide and carbonate are treated either by smelting with carbon or through a wet process.
In the wet process the ores, in which the bismuth is present as oxide or carbonate, are dissolved out with hydrochloric acid, or, if the bismuth is to be extracted from a matte or alloy, the solvent employed is aqua regia or strong sulphuric acid. The solution of metallic chlorides or sulphates so obtained is precipitated by iron, the metallic bismuth filtered, washed with water, pressed in canvas bags, and finally fused in graphite crucibles, the surface being protected by a layer of charcoal. Another process consists in adding water to the solution and so precipitating the bismuth as oxychloride, which is then converted into the metal.
In the wet process, ores containing bismuth as oxide or carbonate are dissolved using hydrochloric acid. If bismuth is extracted from a matte or alloy, the solvent used is aqua regia or strong sulfuric acid. The resulting solution of metallic chlorides or sulfates is then precipitated with iron, and the metallic bismuth is filtered, washed with water, pressed in canvas bags, and finally melted in graphite crucibles, with the surface protected by a layer of charcoal. Another method involves adding water to the solution, which precipitates the bismuth as oxychloride, which is then transformed into the metal.
The crude metal obtained by the preceding processes is generally contaminated by arsenic, sulphur, iron, nickel, cobalt and antimony, and sometimes with silver or gold. A dry method of purification consists in a liquation on a hearth of peculiar construction, which occasions the separation of the unreduced bismuth sulphide and the bulk of the other impurities. A better process is to remelt the metal in crucibles with the addition of certain refining agents. The details of this process vary very considerably, being conditioned by the composition of the impure metal and the practice of particular works. The wet refining process is more tedious and expensive, and is only exceptionally employed, as in the case of preparing the pure metal or its salts for pharmaceutical or chemical purposes. The basic nitrate is the salt generally prepared, and, in general outline, the process consists in dissolving the metal in nitric acid, adding water to the solution, boiling the precipitated basic nitrate with an alkali to remove the arsenic and lead, dissolving the residue in nitric acid, and reprecipitating as basic nitrate with water. J.F.W. Hampe prepared chemically pure bismuth by fusing the metal with sodium carbonate and sulphur, dissolving the bismuth sulphide so formed in nitric acid, precipitating the bismuth as the basic nitrate, re-dissolving this salt in nitric acid, and then precipitating with ammonia. The bismuth hydroxide so obtained is finally reduced by hydrogen.
The crude metal obtained from the previous processes is usually contaminated with arsenic, sulfur, iron, nickel, cobalt, and antimony, and sometimes with silver or gold. A dry purification method involves liquation on a specially designed hearth, which helps separate the unreduced bismuth sulfide and most of the other impurities. A more effective method is to remelt the metal in crucibles with the addition of certain refining agents. The specifics of this process can vary significantly based on the composition of the impure metal and the techniques used in different facilities. The wet refining process is more time-consuming and costly, and it's only used in exceptional cases, like making pure metal or its salts for pharmaceutical or chemical use. The basic nitrate is the salt usually produced, and broadly speaking, the process involves dissolving the metal in nitric acid, adding water to the solution, boiling the precipitated basic nitrate with an alkali to remove arsenic and lead, dissolving the residue in nitric acid, and reprecipitating it as basic nitrate with water. J.F.W. Hampe produced chemically pure bismuth by fusing the metal with sodium carbonate and sulfur, dissolving the resulting bismuth sulfide in nitric acid, precipitating the bismuth as basic nitrate, re-dissolving this salt in nitric acid, and then precipitating it with ammonia. The bismuth hydroxide obtained is finally reduced with hydrogen.
Properties.—Bismuth is a very brittle metal with a white crystalline fracture and a characteristic reddish-white colour. It crystallizes in rhombohedra belonging to the hexagonal system, having interfacial angles of 87° 40′. According to G.W.A. Kahlbaum, Roth and Siedler (Ziet. Anorg. Chem. 29, p. 294), its specific gravity is 9.78143; Roberts and Wrightson give the specific gravity of solid bismuth as 9.82, and of molten bismuth as 10.035. It therefore expands on solidification; and as it retains this property in a number of alloys, the metal receives extensive application in forming type-metals. Its melting-point is variously given as 268.3° (F. Rudberg and A.D. von Riemsdijk) and 270.5° (C.C. Person); commercial bismuth melts at 260° (Ledebur), and electrolytic bismuth at 264° (Classen). It vaporizes in a vacuum at 292°, and its boiling-point, under atmospheric pressure, is between 1090° and 1450° (T. Carnelley and W.C. Williams). Regnault determined its specific heat between 0° and 100° to be 0.0308; Kahlbaum, Roth and Siedler (loc. cit.) give the value 0.03055. Its thermal conductivity is the lowest of all metals, being 18 as compared with silver as 1000; its coefficient of expansion between 0° and 100° is 0.001341. Its electrical conductivity is approximately 1.2, silver at 0° being taken as 100; it is the most diamagnetic substance known, and its thermoelectric properties render it especially valuable for the construction of thermopiles.
Properties.—Bismuth is a very brittle metal with a white crystalline fracture and a distinctive reddish-white color. It crystallizes in rhombohedra within the hexagonal system, having interfacial angles of 87° 40′. According to G.W.A. Kahlbaum, Roth, and Siedler (Ziet. Anorg. Chem. 29, p. 294), its specific gravity is 9.78143; Roberts and Wrightson report the specific gravity of solid bismuth as 9.82 and that of molten bismuth as 10.035. This means it expands when solidifying, and since it retains this property in several alloys, the metal is widely used in the production of type-metals. Its melting point is reported as 268.3° (F. Rudberg and A.D. von Riemsdijk) and 270.5° (C.C. Person); commercial bismuth melts at 260° (Ledebur), while electrolytic bismuth melts at 264° (Classen). It vaporizes in a vacuum at 292°, and its boiling point under atmospheric pressure ranges from 1090° to 1450° (T. Carnelley and W.C. Williams). Regnault found its specific heat between 0° and 100° to be 0.0308; Kahlbaum, Roth, and Siedler (loc. cit.) provide the value of 0.03055. Its thermal conductivity is the lowest of all metals, measured at 18 compared to silver's 1000; its coefficient of expansion between 0° and 100° is 0.001341. Its electrical conductivity is around 1.2, with silver at 0° being set as 100; it is the most diamagnetic substance known, and its thermoelectric properties make it particularly useful for building thermopiles.
The metal oxidizes very slowly in dry air at ordinary temperatures, but somewhat more rapidly in moist air or when heated. In the last case it becomes coated with a greyish-black layer of an oxide (dioxide (?)), at a red heat the layer consists of the trioxide (Bi2O3); and is yellow or green in the case of pure bismuth, and violet or blue if impure; at a bright red heat it burns with a bluish flame to the trioxide. Bismuth combines directly with the halogens, and the elements of the sulphur group. It readily dissolves in nitric acid, aqua regia and hot sulphuric acid, but tardily in hot hydrochloric acid. It is precipitated as the metal from solutions of its salts by the metals of the alkalis and alkaline earths, zinc, iron, copper, &c. In its chemical affinities it resembles arsenic and antimony; an important distinction is that it forms no hydrogen compound analogous to arsine and stibine.
The metal oxidizes very slowly in dry air at normal temperatures, but a bit more quickly in humid air or when heated. In the latter case, it develops a greyish-black oxide layer; at red heat, this layer consists of trioxide (Bi2O3), appearing yellow or green for pure bismuth and violet or blue when it's impure. At bright red heat, it burns with a bluish flame to form trioxide. Bismuth directly combines with halogens and the elements in the sulfur group. It easily dissolves in nitric acid, aqua regia, and hot sulfuric acid but slowly in hot hydrochloric acid. It is precipitated as metal from its salt solutions by alkali and alkaline earth metals, zinc, iron, copper, etc. Chemically, it is similar to arsenic and antimony; a key difference is that it doesn't form a hydrogen compound like arsine and stibine.
Alloys.—Bismuth readily forms alloys with other metals. Treated with sodammonium it yields a bluish-black mass, BiNa3, which takes fire in the air and decomposes water. A brittle potassium alloy of silver-white colour and lamellar fracture is obtained by calcining 20 parts of bismuth with 16 of cream of tartar at a strong red heat. When present in other metals, even in very small quantity, bismuth renders them brittle and impairs their electrical conductivity. With mercury it forms amalgams. Bismuth is a component of many ternary alloys characterized by their low fusibility and expansion in solidification; many of them are used in the arts (see Fusible Metal).
Alloys.—Bismuth easily creates alloys with other metals. When combined with sodammonium, it produces a bluish-black mass, BiNa3, which ignites in air and breaks down water. A brittle potassium alloy that is silver-white and has a layered fracture is produced by heating 20 parts of bismuth with 16 parts of cream of tartar at a high red heat. Even in tiny amounts, bismuth makes other metals brittle and reduces their electrical conductivity. It also forms amalgams with mercury. Bismuth is part of many ternary alloys known for their low melting points and tendency to expand when solidifying; many of these are used in various industries (see Fusible Metal).
Compounds.—Bismuth forms four oxides, of which the trioxide, Bi2O3, is the most important. This compound occurs in nature as bismuth ochre, and may be prepared artificially by oxidizing the metal at a red heat, or by heating the carbonate, nitrate or hydrate. Thus obtained it is a yellow powder, soluble in the mineral acids to form soluble salts, which are readily precipitated as basic salts when the solution is diluted. It melts to a reddish-brown liquid, which solidifies to a yellow crystalline mass on cooling. The Hydrate, Bi(OH)3, is obtained as a white powder by adding potash to a solution of a bismuth salt. Bismuth dioxide, BiO or Bi2O2, is said to be formed by the limited oxidation of the metal, and as a brown precipitate by adding mixed solutions of bismuth and stannous chlorides to a solution of caustic potash. Bismuth tetroxide, Bi2O4, sometimes termed bismuth bismuthate, is obtained by melting bismuth trioxide with potash, or by igniting bismuth trioxide with potash and potassium chlorate. It is also formed by oxidizing bismuth trioxide suspended in caustic potash with chlorine, the pentoxide being formed simultaneously; oxidation and potassium ferricyanide simply gives the tetroxide (Hauser and Vanino, Zeit. Anorg. Chem., 1904, 39, p. 381). The hydrate, Bi2O4·2H2O, is also known. Bismuth pentoxide, Bi2C5, is obtained by heating bismuthic acid, HBiO3, to 130°C.; this acid (in the form of its salts) being the product of the continued oxidation of an alkaline solution of bismuth trioxide.
Compounds.—Bismuth has four oxides, with bismuth trioxide, Bi2O3, being the most significant. This compound occurs naturally as bismuth ochre and can be made artificially by oxidizing the metal at a high temperature or by heating the carbonate, nitrate, or hydrate. When produced, it appears as a yellow powder that dissolves in mineral acids to create solvable salts, which easily precipitate as basic salts when diluted. It melts into a reddish-brown liquid that solidifies into a yellow crystalline solid upon cooling. The hydrate, Bi(OH)3, is obtained as a white powder by adding potash to a solution of a bismuth salt. Bismuth dioxide, BiO or Bi2O2, is reportedly formed through limited oxidation of the metal and appears as a brown precipitate when mixed solutions of bismuth and stannous chlorides are added to a caustic potash solution. Bismuth tetroxide, Bi2O4, sometimes called bismuth bismuthate, is produced by melting bismuth trioxide with potash or by igniting bismuth trioxide with potash and potassium chlorate. It can also be formed by oxidizing bismuth trioxide suspended in caustic potash with chlorine, simultaneously producing the pentoxide; oxidation with potassium ferricyanide yields only the tetroxide (Hauser and Vanino, Zeit. Anorg. Chem., 1904, 39, p. 381). The hydrate, Bi2O4·2H2O, is also recognized. Bismuth pentoxide, Bi2C5, is obtained by heating bismuthic acid, HBiO3, to 130°C; this acid (in the form of its salts) results from the continuous oxidation of an alkaline solution of bismuth trioxide.
Bismuth forms two chlorides: BiCl2 and BiCl3. The dichloride, BiCl2, is obtained as a brown crystalline powder by fusing the metal with the trichloride, or in a current of chlorine, or by heating the metal with calomel to 250°. Water decomposes it to metallic bismuth and the oxychloride, BiOCl. Bismuth trichloride, BiCl3, was obtained by Robert Boyle by heating the metal with corrosive sublimate. It is the final product of burning bismuth in an excess of chlorine. It is a white substance, melting at 225°-230° and boiling at 435°-441°. With excess of water, it gives a white precipitate of the oxychloride, BiOCl. Bismuth trichloride forms double compounds with hydrochloric acid, the chlorides of the alkaline metals, ammonia, nitric oxide and nitrosyl chloride. Bismuth trifluoride, BiF3, a white powder, bismuth tribromide, BiBr3, golden yellow crystals, bismuth iodide, BiI3, greyish-black crystals, are also known. These compounds closely resemble the trichloride in their methods of preparation and their properties, forming oxyhaloids with water, and double compounds with ammonia, &c.
Bismuth has two types of chlorides: BiCl2 and BiCl3. The dichloride, BiCl2, is produced as a brown crystalline powder by melting the metal with the trichloride, or in a stream of chlorine, or by heating the metal with calomel at 250°. When exposed to water, it breaks down into metallic bismuth and the oxychloride, BiOCl. Bismuth trichloride, BiCl3, was discovered by Robert Boyle by heating the metal with corrosive sublimate. It’s the end product of burning bismuth in excess chlorine. This compound is white, with a melting point between 225°-230° and a boiling point between 435°-441°. When mixed with excess water, it results in a white precipitate of oxychloride, BiOCl. Bismuth trichloride can form double compounds with hydrochloric acid, the chlorides of alkali metals, ammonia, nitric oxide, and nitrosyl chloride. Bismuth trifluoride, BiF3, appears as a white powder; bismuth tribromide, BiBr3, is golden yellow crystals; and bismuth iodide, BiI3, consists of greyish-black crystals. These compounds are similar to the trichloride in their preparation methods and properties, forming oxyhaloids with water and double compounds with ammonia, etc.
Carbonates.—The basic carbonate, 2(BiO)2CO3·H2O, obtained as a white precipitate when an alkaline carbonate is added to a solution of bismuth nitrate, is employed in medicine. Another basic carbonate, 3(BiO)2CO3·2Bi(OH)3·3H2O, constitutes the mineral bismutite.
Carbonates.—The basic carbonate, 2(BiO)2CO3·H2O, is a white precipitate formed when an alkaline carbonate is added to a bismuth nitrate solution, and it is used in medicine. Another basic carbonate, 3(BiO)2CO3·2Bi(OH)3·3H2O, makes up the mineral bismutite.
Nitrates.—The normal nitrate, Bi(NO3)3·5H2O, is obtained in large transparent asymmetric prisms by evaporating a solution of the metal in nitric acid. The action of water on this solution produces a crystalline precipitate of basic nitrate, probably Bi(OH)2NO3, though it varies with the amount of water employed. This precipitate constitutes the “magistery of bismuth” or “subnitrate of bismuth” of pharmacy, and under the name of pearl white, blanc d’Espagne or blanc de fard has long been used as a cosmetic.
Nitrates.—The standard nitrate, Bi(NO3)3·5H2O, is produced in large, clear, asymmetrical prisms by evaporating a solution of the metal in nitric acid. When water interacts with this solution, it creates a crystalline precipitate of basic nitrate, likely Bi(OH)2NO3, although this can change depending on the amount of water used. This precipitate is known as the “magistery of bismuth” or “subnitrate of bismuth” in pharmacy and has been used as a cosmetic under the names pearl white, blanc d’Espagne, or blanc de fard for a long time.
Sulphides.—Bismuth combines directly with sulphur to form a, disulphide, Bi2S2, and a trisulphide, Bi2S3, the latter compound being formed when the sulphur is in excess. A hydrated disulphide, Bi2S2·2H2O, is obtained by passing sulphuretted hydrogen into a solution of bismuth nitrate and stannous chloride. Bismuth 11 disulphide is a grey metallic substance, which is decomposed by hydrochloric acid with the separation of metallic bismuth and the formation of bismuth trichloride. Bismuth trisulphide, Bi2S3, constitutes the mineral bismuthite, and may be prepared by direct union of its constituents, or as a brown precipitate by passing sulphuretted hydrogen into a solution of a bismuth salt. It is easily soluble in nitric acid. When heated to 200° it assumes the crystalline form of bismuthite. Bismuth forms several oxysulphides: Bi4O3S constitutes the mineral karelinite found at the Zavodinski mine in the Altai; Bi6O3S4 and Bi2O3S have been prepared artificially. Bismuth also forms the sulphohaloids, BiSCl, BiSBr, BiSI, analogous to the oyxhaloids.
Sulfides.—Bismuth directly combines with sulfur to form a disulfide, Bi2S2, and a trisulfide, Bi2S3, with the latter compound being formed when there is an excess of sulfur. A hydrated disulfide, Bi2S2·2H2O, is produced by passing hydrogen sulfide into a solution of bismuth nitrate and stannous chloride. Bismuth 11 disulfide is a gray metallic substance that is decomposed by hydrochloric acid, separating metallic bismuth and forming bismuth trichloride. Bismuth trisulfide, Bi2S3, makes up the mineral bismuthite and can be prepared by directly combining its components or as a brown precipitate by passing hydrogen sulfide into a bismuth salt solution. It is easily soluble in nitric acid. When heated to 200°, it takes on the crystalline form of bismuthite. Bismuth also forms several oxysulfides: Bi4O3S makes up the mineral karelinite found at the Zavodinski mine in the Altai; Bi6O3S4 and Bi2O3S have been artificially created. Bismuth also forms sulfohalides, BiSCl, BiSBr, BiSI, similar to the oxyhalides.
Bismuth sulphate, Bi2(SO4)3, is obtained as a white powder by dissolving the metal or sulphide in concentrated sulphuric acid. Water decomposes it, giving a basic salt, Bi2(SO4)(OH)4, which on heating gives (BiO)2SO4. Other basic salts are known.
Bismuth sulfate, Bi2(SO4)3, is produced as a white powder by dissolving the metal or sulfide in concentrated sulfuric acid. Water breaks it down, producing a basic salt, Bi2(SO4)(OH)4, which when heated forms (BiO)2SO4. Other basic salts are also known.
Bismuth forms compounds similar to the trisulphide with the elements selenium and tellurium. The tritelluride constitutes the mineral tetradymite, Bi2Te3.
Bismuth forms compounds similar to trisulfide with selenium and tellurium. The tritelluride makes up the mineral tetradymite, Bi2Te3.
Analysis.—Traces of bismuth may be detected by treating the solution with excess of tartaric acid, potash and stannous chloride, a precipitate or dark coloration of bismuth oxide being formed even when only one part of bismuth is present in 20,000 of water. The blackish brown sulphide precipitated from bismuth salts by sulphuretted hydrogen is insoluble in ammonium sulphide, but is readily dissolved by nitric acid. The metal can be reduced by magnesium, zinc, cadmium, iron, tin, copper and substances like hypophosphorous acid from acid solutions or from alkaline ones by formaldehyde. In quantitative estimations it is generally weighed as oxide, after precipitation as sulphide or carbonate, or in the metallic form, reduced as above.
Analysis.—You can find traces of bismuth by adding excess tartaric acid, potash, and stannous chloride to the solution, which will create a precipitate or dark color of bismuth oxide even if there's just one part of bismuth in 20,000 parts of water. The dark brown sulfide that forms from bismuth salts with hydrogen sulfide is insoluble in ammonium sulfide but easily dissolves in nitric acid. The metal can be reduced using magnesium, zinc, cadmium, iron, tin, copper, and similar substances like hypophosphorous acid from either acidic or alkaline solutions using formaldehyde. In quantitative measurements, it’s usually weighed as oxide, after being precipitated as sulfide or carbonate, or in its metallic form, reduced as mentioned above.
Pharmacology.—The salts of bismuth are feebly antiseptic. Taken internally the subnitrate, coming into contact with water, tends to decompose, gradually liberating nitric acid, one of the most powerful antiseptics. The physical properties of the powder also give it a mild astringent action. There are no remote actions.
Pharmacology.—Bismuth salts have weak antiseptic properties. When taken internally, subnitrate, upon contact with water, breaks down and slowly releases nitric acid, which is one of the most effective antiseptics. The physical characteristics of the powder also provide a mild astringent effect. There are no distant effects.
Therapeutics.—The subnitrate of bismuth is invaluable in certain cases of dyspepsia, and still more notably so in diarrhoea. It owes its value to the decomposition described above, by means of which a powerful antiseptic action is safely and continuously exerted. There is hardly a safer drug. It may be given in drachm doses with impunity. It colours the faeces black owing to the formation of sulphide.
Therapeutics.—Bismuth subnitrate is extremely effective for certain types of indigestion and even more so for diarrhea. Its effectiveness comes from the decomposition process mentioned earlier, which provides a strong antiseptic effect that is both safe and ongoing. It's one of the safest medications available. It can be taken in drachm doses without any risk. It turns the stool black due to the formation of sulfide.
BISMUTHITE, a somewhat rare mineral, consisting of bismuth trisulphide, Bi2S3. It crystallizes in the orthorhombic system and is isomorphous with stibnite (Sb2S3), which it closely resembles in appearance. It forms loose interlacing aggregates of acicular crystals without terminal faces (only in a single instance has a terminated crystal been observed), or as masses with a foliated or fibrous structure. An important character is the perfect cleavage in one direction parallel to the length of the needles. The colour is lead-grey inclining to tin-white and often with a yellowish or iridescent tarnish. The hardness is 2; specific gravity 6.4-6.5. Bismuthite occurs at several localities in Cornwall and Bolivia, often in association with native bismuth and tin-ores. Other localities are known; for instance, Brandy Gill in Caldbeck Fells, Cumberland, where with molybdenite and apatite it is embedded in white quartz. The mineral was known to A. Cronstedt in 1758, and was named bismuthine by F.S. Beudant in 1832. This name, which is also used in the forms bismuthite and bismuthinite, is rather unfortunate, since it is readily confused with bismite (bismuth oxide) and bismutite (basic bismuth carbonate), especially as the latter has also been used in the form bismuthite. The name bismuth-glance or bismutholamprite for the species under consideration is free from this objection.
Bismuthinite, is a somewhat rare mineral made up of bismuth trisulphide, Bi2S3. It crystallizes in the orthorhombic system and is isomorphous with stibnite (Sb2S3), closely resembling it in appearance. It forms loose interlacing aggregates of acicular crystals without terminal faces (only one instance of a terminated crystal has been observed), or as masses with a foliated or fibrous structure. An important characteristic is the perfect cleavage in one direction parallel to the length of the needles. The color is lead-grey leaning towards tin-white and often has a yellowish or iridescent tarnish. The hardness is 2, with a specific gravity of 6.4-6.5. Bismuthite is found in several locations in Cornwall and Bolivia, usually alongside native bismuth and tin ores. Other locations include Brandy Gill in Caldbeck Fells, Cumberland, where it is found with molybdenite and apatite embedded in white quartz. The mineral was identified by A. Cronstedt in 1758 and was named bismuthine by F.S. Beudant in 1832. This name, which is also seen in the forms bismuthite and bismuthinite, is somewhat unfortunate, as it can be easily confused with bismite (bismuth oxide) and bismutite (basic bismuth carbonate), especially since the latter has also been referred to as bismuthite. The name bismuth-glance or bismutholamprite for this species avoids this confusion.
BISMYA, a group of ruin mounds, about 1 m. long and ½ m. wide, consisting of a number of low ridges, nowhere exceeding 40 ft. in height, lying in the Jezireh, somewhat nearer to the Tigris than the Euphrates, about a day’s journey to the south-east of Nippur, a little below 32° N. and about 45° 40′ E. Excavations conducted here for six months, from Christmas of 1903 to June 1904, for the university of Chicago, by Dr Edgar J. Banks, proved that these mounds covered the site of the ancient city of Adab (Ud-Nun), hitherto known only from a brief mention of its name in the introduction to the Khammurabi code (c. 2250 B.C.). The city was divided into two parts by a canal, on an island in which stood the temple, E-mach, with a ziggurat, or stage tower. It was evidently once a city of considerable importance, but deserted at a very early period, since the ruins found close to the surface of the mounds belong to Dungi and Ur Gur, kings of Ur in the earlier part of the third millennium B.C. Immediately below these, as at Nippur, were found the remains of Naram-Sin and Sar-gon, c. 3000 B.C. Below these there were still 35 ft. of stratified remains, constituting seven-eighths of the total depth of the ruins. Besides the remains of buildings, walls, graves, &c., Dr Banks discovered a large number of inscribed clay tablets of a very early period, bronze and stone tablets, bronze implements and the like. But the two most notable discoveries were a complete statue in white marble, apparently the most ancient yet found in Babylonia (now in the museum in Constantinople), bearing the inscription—“E-mach, King Da-udu, King of Ud-Nun”; and a temple refuse heap, consisting of great quantities of fragments of vases in marble, alabaster, onyx, porphyry and granite, some of which were inscribed, and others engraved and inlaid with ivory and precious stones.
BISMYA, is a group of ruin mounds, about 1 meter long and ½ meter wide, made up of several low ridges, none higher than 40 feet. They're located in the Jezireh region, a bit closer to the Tigris than the Euphrates, roughly a day's journey southeast of Nippur, just below 32° N and about 45° 40′ E. Excavations here lasted six months, from Christmas of 1903 to June 1904, led by Dr. Edgar J. Banks for the University of Chicago. These excavations revealed that the mounds covered the site of the ancient city of Adab (Ud-Nun), which was previously known only from a brief mention in the introduction to the Code of Hammurabi (around 2250 BCE). The city was divided by a canal, with a temple called E-mach and a ziggurat, or stage tower, on an island. It was clearly once a significant city but was abandoned early, as the ruins near the surface of the mounds date back to Dungi and Ur-Gur, kings of Ur in the earlier part of the third millennium BCE Just below these layers, like at Nippur, were the remnants of Naram-Sin and Sargon, around 3000 BCE Below that, there are still 35 feet of stratified remains, making up seven-eighths of the total depth of the ruins. In addition to building remains, walls, graves, etc., Dr. Banks found many inscribed clay tablets from a very early period, along with bronze and stone tablets, bronze tools, and more. However, the two most remarkable finds were a complete white marble statue, likely the oldest ever discovered in Babylonia (now in the museum in Constantinople), with the inscription—“E-mach, King Da-udu, King of Ud-Nun”; and a temple refuse heap, containing a large quantity of fragments of vases made of marble, alabaster, onyx, porphyry, and granite, some inscribed, others engraved, and inlaid with ivory and precious stones.
BISON, the name of the one existing species of European wild ox, Bos (Bison) bonasus, known in Russian as zubr. Together with the nearly allied New World animal known in Europe as the (North) American bison, but in its own country as “buffalo,” and scientifically as Bos (Bison) bison, the bison represents a group of the ox tribe distinguished from other species by the greater breadth and convexity of the forehead, superior length of limb, and the longer spinal processes of the dorsal vertebrae, which, with the powerful muscles attached for the support of the massive head, form a protuberance or hump on the shoulders. The bisons have also fourteen pairs of ribs, while the common ox has only thirteen. The forehead and neck of both species are covered with long, shaggy hair of a dark brown colour; and in winter the whole of the neck, shoulders and hump are similarly clothed, so as to form a curly, felted mane. This mane in the European species disappears in summer; but in the American bison it is to a considerable extent persistent.
BISON, is the name of the only existing species of European wild ox, Bos (Bison) bonasus, known in Russian as zubr. Along with the closely related North American animal referred to in Europe as the (North) American bison, but known in its own country as “buffalo,” and scientifically as Bos (Bison) bison, the bison is part of a group within the ox family that is distinct from other species due to their broader and more rounded foreheads, longer legs, and elongated spinal processes of the dorsal vertebrae, which, along with the strong muscles supporting their large heads, create a noticeable hump on their shoulders. Bison also have fourteen pairs of ribs, while the common ox has only thirteen. Both species feature long, shaggy dark brown hair covering their foreheads and necks; in winter, the neck, shoulders, and hump are fully covered, forming a curly, felt-like mane. This mane in the European species disappears in summer, but in the American bison, it largely remains throughout the year.
The bison is now the largest European quadruped, measuring about 10 ft. long, exclusive of the tail, and standing nearly 6 ft. high. Formerly it was abundant throughout Europe, as is proved by the fossil remains of this or a closely allied form found on the continent and in England, associated with those of the extinct mammoth and rhinoceros. Caesar mentions the bison as abounding, along with the extinct aurochs or wild ox, in the forests of Germany and Belgium, where it appears to have been occasionally captured and afterwards exhibited alive in the Roman amphitheatres. At that period, and long after, it seems to have been common throughout central Europe, as we learn from the evidence of Herberstein in the 16th century. Nowadays bison are found in a truly wild condition only in the forests of the Caucasus, where they are specially protected by the Russian government. There is, however, a herd, somewhat in the condition of park-animals, in the forest of Byelovitsa, in Lithuania, where it is protected by the tsar, but nevertheless is gradually dying out. In 1862 the Lithuanian bisons numbered over 1200, but by 1872 they had diminished to 528, and in 1892 there were only 491. The prince of Pless has a small herd at Promnitz, his Silesian estate, founded by the gift of a bull and three cows by Alexander II. in 1855, his herd being the source of the menagerie supply.
The bison is now the largest land animal in Europe, measuring about 10 feet long, not including the tail, and standing nearly 6 feet tall. It used to be widespread across Europe, as shown by fossil remains of this species or closely related forms found on the continent and in England, alongside those of the extinct mammoth and rhinoceros. Caesar mentioned that bison were abundant, along with the extinct aurochs or wild ox, in the forests of Germany and Belgium, where they were occasionally captured and later displayed alive in Roman amphitheaters. At that time, and for many years after, they seemed to be common throughout central Europe, as evidenced by Herberstein in the 16th century. Today, bison are found in truly wild conditions only in the forests of the Caucasus, where they are specially protected by the Russian government. However, there is also a herd, similar to park animals, in the Byelovitsa forest in Lithuania, where it is protected by the tsar but is slowly dying out. In 1862, the Lithuanian bison population was over 1,200, but by 1872 it had dropped to 528, and by 1892 only 491 remained. The prince of Pless has a small herd at Promnitz, his estate in Silesia, established from a gift of a bull and three cows from Alexander II in 1855; this herd serves as a source for zoological collections.
Bison feed on a coarse aromatic grass, and browse on the leaves, shoots, bark and twigs of trees.
Bison eat rough, fragrant grass and browse on the leaves, shoots, bark, and twigs of trees.
The American bison is distinguished from its European cousin by the following among other features: The hind-quarters are weaker and fall away more suddenly, while the withers are proportionately higher. Especially characteristic is the great mass of brown or blackish brown hair clothing the head, neck and forepart of the body. The shape of the skull and horns is also different; the horns themselves being shorter, thicker, blunter and more sharply curved, while the forehead of the skull is more convex and the sockets of the eyes are more distinctly tubular. This species formerly ranged over a third of North America in countless numbers, but is now practically extinct. The great herd was separated into a northern and 12 southern division by the completion of the Union Pacific railway, and the annual rate of destruction from 1870 to 1875 has been estimated at 2,500,000 head. In 1880 the completion of the Northern Pacific railway led to an attack upon the northern herd. The last of the Dakota bisons were destroyed by Indians in 1883, leaving then less than 1000 wild individuals in the United State.
The American bison is different from its European counterpart in several ways: its hindquarters are weaker and slope off more steeply, while its shoulders are relatively higher. A notable feature is the thick mass of brown or dark brown hair that covers its head, neck, and front part of its body. The shape of the skull and horns also varies; the horns are shorter, thicker, blunter, and more sharply curved, while the forehead of the skull is rounder and the eye sockets are more distinctly tubular. This species used to roam over a third of North America in massive numbers but is now nearly extinct. The vast herds were divided into northern and southern groups with the completion of the Union Pacific railway, and between 1870 and 1875, an estimated 2,500,000 bison were killed each year. In 1880, the completion of the Northern Pacific railway led to further attacks on the northern herd. The last of the Dakota bison were killed by Native Americans in 1883, leaving fewer than 1,000 wild individuals in the United States.
A count which was concluded at the end of February 1903, put the number of captive bisons at 1119, of which 969 were in parks and zoological gardens in the United States, 41 in Canada and 109 in Europe. At the same time it was estimated that there were 34 wild bison in the United States and 600 in Canada.
A count finished at the end of February 1903 reported that there were 1,119 captive bison, with 969 in parks and zoos in the United States, 41 in Canada, and 109 in Europe. At the same time, it was estimated that there were 34 wild bison in the United States and 600 in Canada.
In England small herds are kept by the duke of Bedford at Woburn Abbey, Bedfordshire, and by Mr C.J. Leyland at Haggerston Castle, Northumberland.
In England, small herds are maintained by the Duke of Bedford at Woburn Abbey, Bedfordshire, and by Mr. C.J. Leyland at Haggerston Castle, Northumberland.
Two races of the American bison have been distinguished—the typical prairie form, and the woodland race, B. bison athabascae; but the two are very similar.
Two types of American bison have been identified—the typical prairie variety and the woodland variety, B. bison athabascae; however, the two are quite similar.
BISQUE (a French word of unknown origin, formerly spelt in English “bisk”), a term for odds given in the games of tennis, lawn tennis, croquet and golf; in the two former a bisque is one point to be taken at any time during a “set” at the choice of the receiver of the odds, while in croquet and golf it is one extra stroke to be taken similarly during a game. The name is given, in cookery, to a thick soup, made particularly of crayfish or lobsters.
BISQUE (a French word of unknown origin, previously spelled in English as “bisk”) is a term for odds used in tennis, lawn tennis, croquet, and golf; in the first two sports, a bisque is one point that can be taken at any time during a “set,” chosen by the player receiving the odds. In croquet and golf, it refers to one extra stroke that can be taken similarly during a game. In cooking, the term is used for a thick soup, typically made from crayfish or lobsters.
BISSELL, GEORGE EDWIN (1839- ), American sculptor, son of a quarryman and marble-cutter, was born at New Preston, Connecticut, on the 16th of February 1839. During the Civil War he served as a private in the 23rd Connecticut volunteers in the Department of the Gulf (1862-1863), and on being mustered out became acting assistant paymaster in the South Atlantic squadron. At the close of the war he joined his father in business. He studied the art of sculpture abroad in 1875-1876, and lived much in Paris during the years 1883-1896, with occasional visits to America. Among his more important works are the soldiers’ and sailors’ monument, and a statue of Colonel Chatfield, at Waterbury, Connecticut; and statues of General Gates at Saratoga, New York, of Chancellor John Watts in Trinity churchyard, New York City; of Colonel Abraham de Peyster in Bowling Green, New York City; of Abraham Lincoln at Edinburgh; of Burns and “Highland Mary,” in Ayr, Scotland; of Chancellor James Kent, in the Congressional library, Washington; and of President Arthur in Madison Square, New York City.
BISSELL, GEORGE EDWIN (1839- ), American sculptor, son of a quarryman and marble cutter, was born in New Preston, Connecticut, on February 16, 1839. During the Civil War, he served as a private in the 23rd Connecticut Volunteers in the Department of the Gulf (1862-1863), and after being mustered out, he became acting assistant paymaster in the South Atlantic Squadron. After the war, he went into business with his father. He studied sculpture abroad in 1875-1876 and spent a lot of time in Paris from 1883 to 1896, with occasional trips back to America. Some of his significant works include the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Monument and a statue of Colonel Chatfield in Waterbury, Connecticut; statues of General Gates in Saratoga, New York, Chancellor John Watts in Trinity Churchyard in New York City, Colonel Abraham de Peyster in Bowling Green, New York City, Abraham Lincoln in Edinburgh, Burns and “Highland Mary” in Ayr, Scotland, Chancellor James Kent in the Congressional Library in Washington, and President Arthur in Madison Square, New York City.
BISSEXT, or Bissextus (Lat. bis, twice; sextus, sixth), the day intercalated by the Julian calendar in the February of every fourth year to make up the six hours by which the solar year was computed to exceed the year of 365 days. The day was inserted after the 24th of February, i.e. the 6th day before the calends (1st) of March; there was consequently, besides the sextus, or sixth before the calends, the bis-sextus or “second sixth,” our 25th of February. In modern usage, with the exception of ecclesiastical calendars, the intercalary day is added for convenience at the end of the month, and years in which February has 29 days are called “bissextile,” or leap-years.
BISSEXT, or Leap Year (Lat. bis, twice; sextus, sixth), is the day added by the Julian calendar in February every four years to account for the six extra hours that make the solar year longer than 365 days. This day is placed after February 24th, meaning it's the 6th day before March 1st; therefore, in addition to the sextus, which is the sixth before the calends, there's also the bis-sextus or “second sixth,” which is our February 25th. Nowadays, except for church calendars, the extra day is typically added at the end of the month, and years when February has 29 days are called “bissextile” or leap years.
BIT (from the verb “to bite,” either in the sense of a piece bitten off, or an act of biting, or a thing that bites or is bitten), generally, a piece of anything; the word is, however, used in various special senses, all derivable from its origin, either literally or metaphorically. The most common of these are (1) its use as the name of various tools, e.g. centre-bit; (2) a horse’s “bit,” or the metal mouth-piece of the bridle; (3) in money, a small sum of money of varying value (e.g. threepenny-bit), especially in the West Indies and southern United States.
BIT (from the verb “to bite,” in the sense of a piece taken off, or an act of biting, or something that bites or can be bitten), generally refers to a piece of anything; however, the word is also used in various specific contexts, all traceable to its origin, either literally or metaphorically. The most common uses include (1) the names of different tools, e.g. center bit; (2) a horse’s “bit,” or the metal mouthpiece of the bridle; (3) in finance, a small amount of money of varying value (e.g. threepenny bit), especially in the Caribbean and the southern United States.
BITHUR, a town in the Cawnpore district of the United Provinces of India, 12 m. N.W. of Cawnpore city. Pop. (1901) 7173. It is chiefly notable for its connexion with the mutiny of 1857. The last of the peshwas, Baji Rao, was banished to Bithur, and his adopted son, the Nana Sahib, made the town his head-quarters. It was captured by Havelock on the 19th of July 1857, when the Nana’s palaces were destroyed.
BITHUR, is a town in the Cawnpore district of the United Provinces of India, 12 miles northwest of Cawnpore city. The population in 1901 was 7,173. It is mainly known for its connection to the 1857 mutiny. The last of the peshwas, Baji Rao, was exiled to Bithur, and his adopted son, the Nana Sahib, made the town his headquarters. Havelock captured it on July 19, 1857, when the Nana's palaces were destroyed.
BITHYNIA (Βιθυνία), an ancient district in the N.W. of Asia Minor, adjoining the Propontis, the Thracian Bosporus and the Euxine. According to Strabo it was bounded on the E. by the river Sangarius; but the more commonly received division extended it to the Parthenius, which separated it from Paphlagonia, thus comprising the district inhabited by the Mariandyni. On the W. and S.W. it was separated from Mysia by the river Rhyndacus; and on the S. it adjoined Phrygia Epictetus and Galatia. It is in great part occupied by mountains and forests, but has valleys and districts near the sea-coast of great fertility. The most important mountain range is the (so-called) “Mysian” Olympus (7600 ft.), which towers above Brusa and is clearly visible as far away as Constantinople (70 m.). Its summits are covered with snow for a great part of the year. East of this the range now called Ala-Dagh extends far above 100 m. from the Sangarius to Paphlagonia. Both of these ranges belong to that border of mountains which bounds the great tableland of Asia Minor. The country between them and the coast, covered with forests and traversed by few lines of route, is still imperfectly known. But the broad tract which projects towards the west as far as the shores of the Bosporus, though hilly and covered with forests—the Turkish Aghatch Denizi, or “The Ocean of Trees”—is not traversed by any mountain chain. The west coast is indented by two deep inlets, (1) the northernmost, the Gulf of Ismid (anc. Gulf of Astacus), penetrating between 40 and 50 m. into the interior as far as Ismid (anc. Nicomedia), separated by an isthmus of only about 25 m. from the Black Sea; (2) the Gulf of Mudania or Gemlik (Gulf of Cius), about 25 m. long. At its extremity is situated the small town of Gemlik (anc. Cius) at the mouth of a valley, communicating with the lake of Isnik, on which was situated Nicaea.
Bithynia (Bithynia), an ancient region in the northwest of Asia Minor, next to the Propontis, the Thracian Bosporus, and the Black Sea. According to Strabo, it was bordered on the east by the Sangarius River; however, the more commonly accepted boundary extended to the Parthenius River, which separated it from Paphlagonia, encompassing the area inhabited by the Mariandyni. To the west and southwest, it was separated from Mysia by the Rhyndacus River; and to the south, it bordered Phrygia Epictetus and Galatia. Much of it is made up of mountains and forests, but there are valleys and regions near the coast that are very fertile. The most significant mountain range is the so-called “Mysian” Olympus (7,600 ft.), which looms over Brusa and can be seen from as far away as Constantinople (70 miles). Its peaks are covered in snow for a large part of the year. To the east of this, the range currently referred to as Ala-Dagh stretches over 100 miles from the Sangarius to Paphlagonia. Both of these ranges are part of the mountainous border that encircles the vast plateau of Asia Minor. The area between these ranges and the coast, which is filled with forests and has few routes, is still not well understood. However, the broad section that extends westward to the shores of the Bosporus, while hilly and forested—the Turkish Aghatch Denizi, or “The Ocean of Trees”—does not have any mountain ranges running through it. The west coast is marked by two deep inlets: (1) the northernmost, the Gulf of Ismid (ancient Gulf of Astacus), reaching 40 to 50 miles into the interior as far as Ismid (ancient Nicomedia), separated by just about 25 miles from the Black Sea; (2) the Gulf of Mudania or Gemlik (Gulf of Cius), which is about 25 miles long. At its end lies the small town of Gemlik (ancient Cius) at the mouth of a valley that connects with Lake Isnik, where Nicaea was located.
The principal rivers are the Sangarius (mod. Sakaria), which traverses the province from south to north; the Rhyndacus, which separated it from Mysia; and the Billaeus (Filiyas), which rises in the Ala-Dagh, about 50 m. from the sea, and after flowing by Boli (anc. Claudiopolis) falls into the Euxine, close to the ruins of the ancient Tium, about 40 m. north-east of Heraclea, having a course of more than 100 m. The Parthenius (mod. Bartan), the boundary of the province towards the east, is a much less considerable stream.
The main rivers are the Sangarius (now called Sakaria), which flows through the region from south to north; the Rhyndacus, which separates it from Mysia; and the Billaeus (Filiyas), which starts in the Ala-Dagh about 50 miles from the sea, and after passing by Boli (formerly Claudiopolis), empties into the Black Sea near the ruins of the ancient Tium, about 40 miles northeast of Heraclea, with a flow of over 100 miles. The Parthenius (now Bartan), which marks the eastern boundary of the province, is a much smaller river.
The natural resources of Bithynia are still imperfectly developed. Its vast forests would furnish an almost inexhaustible supply of timber, if rendered accessible by roads. Coal also is known to exist near Eregli (Heraclea). The valleys towards the Black Sea abound in fruit trees of all kinds, while the valley of the Sangarius and the plains near Brusa and Isnik (Nicaea) are fertile and well cultivated. Extensive plantations of mulberry trees supply the silk for which Brusa has long been celebrated, and which is manufactured there on a large scale.
The natural resources of Bithynia are still not fully developed. Its large forests could provide an almost unlimited supply of timber if we had the right roads. Coal is also found near Eregli (Heraclea). The valleys leading to the Black Sea are full of all kinds of fruit trees, while the valley of the Sangarius and the plains near Brusa and Isnik (Nicaea) are fertile and well-farmed. Large plantations of mulberry trees produce the silk that Brusa has been famous for, which is manufactured there on a big scale.
According to ancient authors (Herodotus, Xenophon, Strabo, &c.), the Bithynians were an immigrant Thracian tribe. The existence of a tribe called Thyni in Thrace is well attested, and the two cognate tribes of the Thyni and Bithyni appear to have settled simultaneously in the adjoining parts of Asia, where they expelled or subdued the Mysians, Caucones, and other petty tribes, the Mariandyni alone maintaining themselves in the north-east. Herodotus mentions the Thyni and Bithyni as existing side by side; but ultimately the latter must have become the more important, as they gave their name to the country. They were incorporated by Croesus with the Lydian monarchy, with which they fell under the dominion of Persia (546 B.C.), and were included in the satrapy of Phrygia, which comprised all the countries up to the Hellespont and Bosporus. But even before the conquest by Alexander the Bithynians appear to have asserted their independence, and successfully maintained it under two native princes, Bas and Zipoetes, the last of whom transmitted his power to his son Nicomedes I., the first to assume the title of king. This monarch founded Nicomedia, which soon rose to great prosperity, and during his long reign (278-250 B.C.), as well as those of his successors, Prusias I., 13 Prusias II. and Nicomedes II. (149-91 B.C.), the kingdom of Bithynia held a considerable place among the minor monarchies of Asia. But the last king, Nicomedes III., was unable to maintain himself against Mithradates of Pontus, and, after being restored to his throne by the Roman senate, he bequeathed his kingdom by will to the Romans (74 B.C.). Bithynia now became a Roman province. Its limits were frequently varied, and it was commonly united for administrative purposes with the province of Pontus. This was the state of things in the time of Trajan, when the younger Pliny was appointed governor of the combined provinces (103-105 A.D.), a circumstance to which we are indebted for valuable information concerning the Roman provincial administration. Under the Byzantine empire Bithynia was again divided into two provinces, separated by the Sangarias, to the west of which the name of Bithynia was restricted.
According to ancient writers (Herodotus, Xenophon, Strabo, etc.), the Bithynians were a Thracian tribe that migrated. There's solid evidence for a tribe called Thyni in Thrace, and the closely related tribes of Thyni and Bithyni seem to have settled in the neighboring areas of Asia at the same time, where they expelled or defeated the Mysians, Caucones, and other small tribes, with the Mariandyni managing to hold onto their territory in the northeast. Herodotus mentions the Thyni and Bithyni living alongside each other, but eventually, the Bithyni must have become more significant since they gave their name to the region. They were incorporated into the Lydian monarchy by Croesus, and thus came under Persian control (546 B.C.), included in the satrapy of Phrygia, which encompassed all the lands up to the Hellespont and Bosporus. However, even before Alexander's conquest, the Bithynians seem to have asserted their independence and maintained it under two native leaders, Bas and Zipoetes, the latter passing his power to his son Nicomedes I., who was the first to take the title of king. This king founded Nicomedia, which quickly thrived, and during his long reign (278-250 B.C.), as well as those of his successors, Prusias I., Prusias II., and Nicomedes II. (149-91 B.C.), the kingdom of Bithynia held a notable position among the smaller monarchies of Asia. But the last king, Nicomedes III., couldn't hold his ground against Mithradates of Pontus. After being restored to his throne by the Roman senate, he left his kingdom to the Romans in his will (74 B.C.). Bithynia then became a Roman province. Its boundaries often changed, and it was usually combined administratively with the province of Pontus. This was the situation during Trajan’s time when the younger Pliny was appointed governor of the combined provinces (103-105 A.D.), which is why we have valuable insights into Roman provincial administration. Under the Byzantine Empire, Bithynia was again split into two provinces, divided by the Sangarias River, with the name Bithynia limited to the area to the west.
The most important cities were Nicomedia and Nicaea, which disputed with one another the rank of capital. Both of these were founded after Alexander the Great; but at a much earlier period the Greeks had established on the coast the colonies of Cius (afterwards Prusias, mod. Gemlik); Chalcedon, at the entrance of the Bosporus, nearly opposite Constantinople; and Heraclea Pontica, on the Euxine, about 120 m. east of the Bosporus. All these rose to be flourishing places of trade, as also Prusa at the foot of M. Olympus (see Brusa). The only other places of importance at the present day are Ismid (Nicomedia) and Scutari.
The key cities were Nicomedia and Nicaea, which competed for the title of capital. Both were established after Alexander the Great, but much earlier, the Greeks had set up colonies along the coast, such as Cius (later Prusias, now Gemlik); Chalcedon, at the entrance of the Bosporus, almost directly across from Constantinople; and Heraclea Pontica, on the Black Sea, about 120 miles east of the Bosporus. These towns became thriving trading hubs, as did Prusa at the base of Mount Olympus (see Brusa). Today, the only other significant locations are Ismid (Nicomedia) and Scutari.
See C. Texier, Ásie Mineure (Paris, 1839); G. Perrot, Calatie et Bithynie (Paris, 1862); W. von Diest in Petermanns Mittheilungen, Ergansungshelt, 116 (Gotha, 1895).
See C. Texier, Ásie Mineure (Paris, 1839); G. Perrot, Calatie et Bithynie (Paris, 1862); W. von Diest in Petermanns Mittheilungen, Ergansungshelt, 116 (Gotha, 1895).
BITLIS, or Betlis (Arm. Paghesh), the chief town of a vilayet of the same name in Asiatic Turkey, situated at an altitude of 4700 ft. in the deep, narrow valley of the Bitlis Chai, a tributary of the Tigris. The main part of the town and the bazaars are crowded alongside the stream, while suburbs with scattered houses among orchards and gardens extend up two tributary streams. The houses are massive and well built of a soft volcanic tufa, and with their courtyards and gardens climbing up the hillsides afford a striking picture. At the junction of two streams in the centre of the town is a fine old castle, partly ruined, which, according to local tradition, occupies the site of a fortress built by Alexander the Great. It is apparently an Arab building, as Arabic inscriptions appear on the walls, but as the town stands on the principal highway between the Van plateau and the Mesopotamian plain it must always have been of strategic importance. The bazaars are crowded, covered across with branches in summer, and typical of a Kurdish town. The population numbers 35,000, of whom about 12,000 are Armenians and the remainder are Kurds or of Kurdish descent.
BITLIS, or Betlis (Arm. Paghesh), the main town of a province by the same name in Asia Minor, is located at an elevation of 4,700 feet in the deep, narrow valley of the Bitlis Chai, which is a tributary of the Tigris River. The central part of the town and its markets are densely packed along the stream, while neighborhoods with scattered homes among orchards and gardens stretch up two smaller tributary streams. The houses are large and sturdily built from a soft volcanic tufa, and with their courtyards and gardens reaching up the hillsides, they present a striking view. At the point where two streams meet in the heart of the town sits a beautiful old castle, partially in ruins, which, according to local legend, is said to be the site of a fortress built by Alexander the Great. It seems to be an Arab structure, as Arabic writing can be found on the walls, but since the town is located on the main road between the Van plateau and the Mesopotamian plain, it has always held strategic significance. The markets are bustling, covered with branches in the summer, and are characteristic of a Kurdish town. The population is around 35,000, with about 12,000 being Armenians and the rest being Kurds or of Kurdish descent.
Kurdish beys and sheids have much influence in the town and wild mountain districts adjoining, while the Sasun mountains, the scene of successive Armenian revolutions of late years, are not far off to the west. The town was ruled by a semi-independent Kurdish bey as late as 1836. There are some fine old mosques and medresses (colleges), and the Armenians have a large monastery and churches. There are British, French and Russian consuls in the town, and a branch of the American Mission with schools is established also. The climate is healthy and the thermometer rarely falls below 0° Fahr., but there is a heavy snowfall and the narrow streets are blocked for some five months in the year.
Kurdish beys and sheids have a lot of influence in the town and the surrounding wild mountain areas, while the Sasun mountains, known for recent Armenian uprisings, are located not far to the west. The town was governed by a semi-independent Kurdish bey as recently as 1836. There are some impressive old mosques and medresses (schools), and the Armenians maintain a large monastery and several churches. The town also hosts British, French, and Russian consuls, and there’s a branch of the American Mission that operates schools. The climate is healthy, with temperatures rarely dropping below 0° Fahr., but heavy snowfall can block the narrow streets for about five months each year.
A good road runs southward down the pass, passing after a few miles some large chalybeate and sulphur springs. Roads also lead north to Mush and Erzerum and along the lake to Van. Postal communication is through Erzerum with Trebizond. Tobacco of an inferior quality is largely grown, and the chief industry is the weaving of a coarse red cloth. Manna and gum tragacanth are also collected. Fruit is also plentiful, and there are many vineyards close by.
A decent road heads south through the pass and after a few miles, it goes by some large iron-rich and sulfur springs. There are also roads that lead north to Mush and Erzerum and along the lake to Van. Postal services operate through Erzerum to Trebizond. A low-quality tobacco is widely cultivated, and the main industry is the production of coarse red cloth. Manna and gum tragacanth are also harvested. Fruit is abundant, and there are many nearby vineyards.
The Bitlis vilayet comprises a very varied section of Asiatic Turkey, as it includes the Mush plain and the plateau country west of Lake Van, as well as a large extent of wild mountain districts inhabited by turbulent Kurds and Armenians on either side of the central town of Bitlis, also some of the lower country about Sairt along the left bank of the main stream of the Tigris. The mountains have been little explored, but are believed to be rich in minerals, iron, lead, copper, traces of gold and many mineral springs are known to exist.
The Bitlis province includes a diverse area of Asia Minor, featuring the Mush plain and the plateau region west of Lake Van, along with extensive rugged mountains home to restless Kurds and Armenians on both sides of the main town of Bitlis. There are also some lower areas near Sairt along the left bank of the Tigris River. The mountains remain mostly uncharted, but they are thought to be rich in minerals like iron, lead, copper, and even traces of gold, along with many known mineral springs.
BITONTO (anc. Butunti), a town and episcopal see of Apulia, Italy, in the province of Bari, 10 m. west by steam tramway from Bari. Pop. (1901) 30,617. It was a place of no importance in classical times. Its medieval walls are still preserved. Its cathedral is one of the finest examples of the Romanesque architecture of Apulia, and has escaped damage from later restorations. The palazzo Sylos-Labini has a fine Renaissance court of 1502.
BITONTO (formerly Butunti), a town and bishopric in Apulia, Italy, located in the province of Bari, 10 miles west by steam tram from Bari. Population (1901) was 30,617. It wasn’t significant during classical times. Its medieval walls are still intact. The cathedral is one of the best examples of Romanesque architecture in Apulia and has avoided damage from later renovations. The Palazzo Sylos-Labini features a beautiful Renaissance courtyard from 1502.
BITSCH (Fr. Bitche), a town of Germany, in Alsace-Lorraine, on the Horn, at the foot of the northern slope of the Vosges between Hagenau and Saargemund. Pop. (1905) 4000. There are a Roman Catholic and a Protestant church, a classical school and an academy of forestry. The industries include shoe-making and watch-making, and there is some trade in grain and timber. The town of Bitsch, which was formed out of the villages of Rohr and Kaltenhausen in the 17th century, derives its name from the old stronghold (mentioned in 1172 as Bytis Castrum) standing on a rock some 250 ft. above the town. This had long given its name to the countship of Bitsch, which was originally in the possession of the dukes of Lorraine. In 1297 it passed by marriage to Eberhard I. of Zweibrücken, whose line became extinct in 1569, when the countship reverted to Lorraine. It passed with that duchy to France in 1766. After that date the town rapidly increased in population. The citadel, which had been constructed by Vauban on the site of the old castle after the capture of Bitsch by the French in 1624, had been destroyed when it was restored to Lorraine in 1698. This was restored and strengthened in 1740 into a fortress that proved impregnable in all succeeding wars. The attack upon it by the Prussians in 1793 was repulsed; in 1815 they had to be content with blockading it; and in 1870, though it was closely invested by the Germans after the battle of Wörth, it held out until the end of the war. A large part of the fortification is excavated in the red sandstone rock, and rendered bomb-proof; a supply of water is secured to the garrison by a deep well in the interior.
BITSCH (Fr. Bitche), a town in Germany, located in Alsace-Lorraine, on the Horn, at the base of the northern slope of the Vosges mountains between Hagenau and Saargemund. Population (1905) is 4,000. The town has a Roman Catholic church and a Protestant church, a classical school, and a forestry academy. The local industries include shoe-making and watch-making, and there is some trade in grain and timber. Bitsch was formed from the villages of Rohr and Kaltenhausen in the 17th century, taking its name from an old stronghold (mentioned in 1172 as Bytis Castrum) that stands on a rock about 250 ft. above the town. This stronghold was long associated with the countship of Bitsch, originally held by the dukes of Lorraine. In 1297, it passed through marriage to Eberhard I. of Zweibrücken, whose lineage went extinct in 1569, at which point the countship returned to Lorraine. It was transferred to France along with that duchy in 1766. After this date, the town's population grew rapidly. The citadel, built by Vauban on the old castle site after the French captured Bitsch in 1624, was destroyed when it was returned to Lorraine in 1698. It was restored and fortified in 1740 into a stronghold that proved invulnerable in all subsequent conflicts. The Prussians’ assault in 1793 was repelled; in 1815, they had to settle for a blockade; and in 1870, although it was closely surrounded by German forces after the battle of Wörth, it held out until the end of the war. A significant portion of the fortifications is carved into the red sandstone rock, making it bomb-proof; the garrison's water supply is ensured by a deep well located within.
BITTER, KARL THEODORE FRANCIS (1867- ), American sculptor, was born in Vienna on the 6th of December 1867. After studying art there, in 1889 he removed to the United States, where he became naturalized. In America he gained great popularity as a sculptor, and in 1906-1907 was president of the National Sculpture Society, New York. Among his principal works are: the Astor memorial gates, Trinity church, New York; “Elements Controlled and Uncontrolled,” on the Administration Building at the Chicago Exposition; a large relief, “Triumph of Civilization,” in the waiting-room of the Broad Street station of the Pennsylvania railway in Philadelphia; decorations for the Dewey Naval Arch in New York City; the “Standard Bearers,” at the Pan-American Exposition grounds; a sitting statue and a bust of Dr Pepper, provost of the University of Pennsylvania; and the Villard and Hubbard memorials in the New York chamber of commerce.
BITTER, KARL THEODORE FRANCIS (1867- ), American sculptor, was born in Vienna on December 6, 1867. After studying art there, he moved to the United States in 1889, where he became a naturalized citizen. In America, he gained significant popularity as a sculptor, and from 1906 to 1907, he served as president of the National Sculpture Society in New York. Some of his notable works include the Astor memorial gates at Trinity Church in New York; “Elements Controlled and Uncontrolled” on the Administration Building at the Chicago Exposition; a large relief titled “Triumph of Civilization” in the waiting room of the Broad Street station of the Pennsylvania railway in Philadelphia; decorations for the Dewey Naval Arch in New York City; the “Standard Bearers” at the Pan-American Exposition grounds; a sitting statue and a bust of Dr. Pepper, provost of the University of Pennsylvania; and the Villard and Hubbard memorials at the New York Chamber of Commerce.
BITTERFELD, a town of Germany, in the Prussian province of Saxony, 26 m. N. from Leipzig by rail, on the river Mulde, and an important junction of railways from Leipzig and Halle to Berlin. Pop. (1900) 11,839. It manufactures drain-pipes, paper-roofing and machinery, and has saw-mills. Several coal-mines are in the vicinity. The town was built by a colony of Flemish immigrants in 1153. It was captured by the landgrave of Meissen in 1476, and belonged thenceforth to Saxony, until it was ceded to Prussia in 1815. Owing to its pleasant situation and accessibility, it has become a favourite residence of business men of Leipzig and Halle.
BITTERFELD, is a town in Germany, located in the Prussian province of Saxony, 26 miles north of Leipzig by rail, along the river Mulde, and serves as an important railway junction connecting Leipzig and Halle to Berlin. The population in 1900 was 11,839. It produces drain pipes, paper roofing, and machinery, and has sawmills. There are several coal mines nearby. The town was founded by a group of Flemish immigrants in 1153. It was taken over by the landgrave of Meissen in 1476 and then belonged to Saxony until it was given to Prussia in 1815. Due to its pleasant location and easy access, it has become a popular residence for business people from Leipzig and Halle.
BITTERLING (Rhodeus amarus), a little carp-like fish of central Europe, belonging to the Cyprinid family. In it we have a remarkable instance of symbiosis. The genital papilla of the female acquires a great development during the breeding season and becomes produced into a tube nearly as long as the 14 fish itself; this acts as an ovipositor by means of which the comparatively few and large eggs (3 millimetres in diameter) are introduced through the gaping valves between the branchiae of pond mussels (Unio and Anodonta), where, after being inseminated, they undergo their development, the fry leaving their host about a month later. The mollusc reciprocates by throwing off its embryos on the parent fish, in the skin of which they remain encysted for some time, the period of reproduction of the fish and the mussel coinciding.
BITTERLING (Rhodeus amarus) is a small fish similar to a carp, found in central Europe, and it belongs to the Cyprinid family. This species is a fascinating example of symbiosis. During the breeding season, the female's genital papilla develops significantly and extends into a tube that's almost as long as the fish itself; this serves as an ovipositor to introduce the relatively few and large eggs (3 millimeters in diameter) through the open valves between the gills of pond mussels (Unio and Anodonta). After being fertilized, the eggs develop inside the mussels, and the fry leave their host about a month later. The mussel gives back by releasing its embryos onto the parent fish, where they become encysted in the fish's skin for a while, aligning the reproductive cycles of both the fish and the mussel.
BITTERN, a genus of wading birds, belonging to the family Ardeidae, comprising several species closely allied to the herons, from which they differ chiefly in their shorter neck, the back of which is covered with down, and the front with long feathers, which can be raised at pleasure. They are solitary birds, frequenting countries possessing extensive swamps and marshy grounds, remaining at rest by day, concealed among the reeds and bushes of their haunts, and seeking their food, which consists of fish, reptiles, insects and small quadrupeds, in the twilight. The common bittern (Botaurus stellaris) is nearly as large as the heron, and is widely distributed over the eastern hemisphere. Formerly it was common in Britain, but extensive drainage and persecution have greatly dimished its numbers and it is now only an uncertain visitor. Not a winter passes without its appearing in some numbers, when its uncommon aspect, its large size, and beautifully pencilled plumage cause it to be regarded as a great prize by the lucky gun-bearer to whom it falls a victim. Its value as a delicacy for the table, once so highly esteemed, has long vanished. The old fable of this bird inserting its beak into a reed or plunging it into the ground, and so causing the booming sound with which its name will always be associated, is also exploded, and nowadays indeed so few people in Britain have ever heard its loud and awful voice, which seems to be uttered only in the breeding-season, and is therefore unknown in a country where it no longer breeds, that incredulity as to its booming at all has in some quarters succeeded the old belief in this as in other reputed peculiarities of the species. The bittern in the days of falconry was strictly preserved, and afforded excellent sport. It sits crouching on the ground during the day, with its bill pointing in the air, a position from which it is not easily roused, and even when it takes wing, its flight is neither swift nor long sustained. When wounded it requires to be approached with caution, as it will then attack either man or dog with its long sharp bill and its acute claws. It builds a rude nest among the reeds and flags, out of materials which surround it, and the female lays four or five eggs of a brownish olive. During the breeding season it utters a booming noise, from which it probably derives its generic name, Botaurus, and which has made it in many places an object of superstitious dread. Its plumage for the most part is of a pale buff colour, rayed and speckled with black and reddish brown. The American bittern (Botaurus lentiginosus) is somewhat smaller than the European species, and is found throughout the central and southern portions of North America. It also occurs in Britain as an occasional straggler. It is distinguishable by its uniform greyish-brown primaries, which want the tawny bars that characterize B. stellaris. Both species are good eating.
BITTERN, is a type of wading bird that belongs to the family Ardeidae. It includes several species that are closely related to herons, but they mainly differ in having shorter necks, with down on the back and long feathers on the front that can be raised at will. They are solitary birds that prefer areas with large swamps and marshy land, staying hidden among reeds and bushes during the day and hunting for food—which includes fish, reptiles, insects, and small mammals—at twilight. The common bittern (Botaurus stellaris) is almost as large as a heron and is widely found across the eastern hemisphere. It used to be common in Britain, but due to extensive drainage and hunting, its numbers have significantly decreased and it is now only seen occasionally. Each winter, it shows up in some numbers, and its rare appearance, large size, and beautifully patterned feathers make it highly sought after by lucky hunters. Its status as a table delicacy, once greatly valued, has long since faded. The old tale about this bird sticking its beak into a reed or the ground to create the booming sound associated with its name has been debunked. Nowadays, very few people in Britain have ever heard its loud, frightening call, which seems to happen only during breeding season, leading to doubts about its booming altogether in areas where it no longer breeds. In the days of falconry, bitterns were strictly protected and provided great sport. During the day, they sit low on the ground with their bills pointed skyward, a position from which they can be difficult to disturb. Even when they take flight, they are neither fast nor able to fly for long distances. If wounded, they should be approached cautiously, as they will attack humans or dogs with their long, sharp bills and claws. They build simple nests among reeds and flags using nearby materials, and the female lays four or five brownish olive eggs. During the breeding season, they make a booming noise, which likely gave rise to their scientific name, Botaurus, and which has led to superstitions surrounding them. Their feathers are mostly a pale buff color, marked with black and reddish-brown patterns. The American bittern (Botaurus lentiginosus) is slightly smaller than the European species and can be found throughout central and southern North America. It occasionally appears in Britain as a stray. It can be distinguished by its uniform greyish-brown primary feathers, which lack the tawny bars seen in B. stellaris. Both species are considered good to eat.
![]() |
Bittern. |
BITTERN (from “bitter”), the mother liquor obtained from sea-water or brines after the separation of the sodium chloride (common salt) by crystallization. It contains various magnesium salts (sulphate, chloride, bromide and iodide) and is employed commercially for the manufacture of Epsom salts (magnesium sulphate) and bromine. The same term is applied to a mixture of quassia, iron sulphate, cocculus indicus, liquorice, &c., used in adulterating beer.
BITTERN (from “bitter”), is the mother liquor obtained from seawater or brines after separating sodium chloride (common salt) through crystallization. It contains various magnesium salts (sulphate, chloride, bromide, and iodide) and is used commercially to produce Epsom salts (magnesium sulphate) and bromine. The same term also refers to a mixture of quassia, iron sulphate, cocculus indicus, liquorice, etc., used to adulterate beer.
BITTERS, the name given to aromatized (generally alcoholic) beverages containing a bitter substance or substances, used as tonics, appetizers or digestives. The bitterness is imparted by such substances as bitter orange rind, gentian, rhubarb, quassia, cascarilla, angostura, quinine and cinchona. Juniper, cinnamon, carraway, camomile, cloves and other flavouring agents are also employed in conjunction with the bitter principles, alcohol and sugar. Some bitters are prepared by simple maceration and subsequent filtration (see Liqueurs), others by the more complicated distillation process. Those prepared by the latter process are the finer commercial articles. Bitters are usually sold under the name of the substance which has been used to give them the predominant flavour, such as orange, angostura or peach bitters, &c. The alcoholic strength of bitters varies, but is generally in the neighbourhood of 40% of alcohol. Some bitters, although possessing tonic properties, may be regarded as beverages pure and simple, notwithstanding the fact that they are seldom consumed in an undiluted state; others again, are obviously medicinal preparations and should be treated as such.
BITTERS, are aromatic (typically alcoholic) drinks that contain bitter substances, used as tonics, appetizers, or digestives. The bitterness comes from ingredients like bitter orange peel, gentian, rhubarb, quassia, cascarilla, angostura, quinine, and cinchona. Other flavoring agents like juniper, cinnamon, caraway, chamomile, cloves, and others are also combined with the bitter elements, alcohol, and sugar. Some bitters are made through simple soaking and filtering (see Liqueurs), while others use a more complex distillation process. The latter method creates higher-quality commercial products. Bitters are typically named after the main flavor ingredient, such as orange, angostura, or peach bitters, etc. The alcohol content of bitters varies, but is usually around 40% alcohol. Some bitters, while having tonic benefits, can be considered drinks on their own, although they are rarely consumed straight; others are clearly medicinal and should be treated as such.
BITUMEN, the name applied by the Romans to the various descriptions of natural hydrocarbons, the word petroleum not being used in classical Latin. In its widest sense it embraces the whole range of these substances, including natural gas, the more or less liquid descriptions of petroleum, and the solid forms of asphalt, albertite, gilsonite or uintahite, elaterite, ozokerite and hatchettite. To distinguish bitumen intermediate in consistency between asphalt and the more liquid kinds of crude petroleum, the term maltha (Latin) is frequently employed. The bitumens of chief commercial importance may be grouped under the three headings of (1) natural gas, (2) petroleum, and (3) asphalt, and will be found fully described under these titles. In the scriptures there are numerous references to bitumen, among which the following may be quoted:—In Genesis ix. 3, we are told that in the building of the tower of Babel “slime had they for mortar,” and in Genesis xiv. 10, that the vale of Siddim “was full of slime-pits,” the word slime in the latter quotation from our version appearing as bitumen in the Vulgate. Herodotus alludes to the use of the bitumen brought down by the Is, a tributary of the Euphrates, as mortar in building the walls of Babylon. Diodorus, Curtius, Josephus, Bochart and others make similar mention of this use of bitumen, and Vitruvius tells us that it was employed in admixture with clay.
BITUMEN, is the term used by the Romans for different kinds of natural hydrocarbons, as the word petroleum wasn't used in classical Latin. In the broadest sense, it includes all of these substances, such as natural gas, the more or less liquid forms of petroleum, and the solid types like asphalt, albertite, gilsonite, uintahite, elaterite, ozokerite, and hatchettite. To differentiate the bitumen that has a consistency between asphalt and the more liquid forms of crude petroleum, the term maltha (Latin) is often used. The bitumens of greatest commercial significance can be categorized into three groups: (1) natural gas, (2) petroleum, and (3) asphalt, which are detailed under these headings. The scriptures make numerous references to bitumen, including: in Genesis ix. 3, it mentions that when building the tower of Babel, “they had slime for mortar,” and in Genesis xiv. 10, it states that the vale of Siddim “was full of slime-pits,” where the word slime in our version translates to bitumen in the Vulgate. Herodotus mentions the use of bitumen sourced from the Is, a tributary of the Euphrates, as mortar in constructing the walls of Babylon. Diodorus, Curtius, Josephus, Bochart, and others also refer to this use of bitumen, and Vitruvius tells us that it was mixed with clay.
In its various forms, bitumen is one of the most widely distributed of substances. It occurs, though sometimes only in small quantity, in almost every part of the globe, and throughout the whole range of geological strata, from the Laurentian rocks to the most recent members of the Quaternary period. Although the gaseous and liquid forms of bitumen may be regarded as having been formed in the strata in which they are found or as having been received into such strata shortly after formation, the semi-solid and solid varieties may be considered to have been produced by the oxidation and evaporation of 15 liquid petroleum escaping from underlying or better preserved deposits into other strata, or into fissures where atmospheric action and loss of the more volatile constituents can take place. It should, however, be stated that there is some difference of opinion as to the precise manner of production of some of the solid forms of bitumen, and especially of ozokerite.
In its various forms, bitumen is one of the most widely distributed substances. It can be found, sometimes only in small quantities, in almost every part of the world and across the entire range of geological layers, from the Laurentian rocks to the most recent deposits of the Quaternary period. While gaseous and liquid forms of bitumen can be seen as having formed in the layers where they exist or as having entered those layers shortly after formation, the semi-solid and solid types are thought to have resulted from the oxidation and evaporation of liquid petroleum that escapes from deeper or better-preserved deposits into other layers or fissures, where exposure to the atmosphere allows for the loss of the more volatile components. However, it's important to note that there are varying opinions on the exact way some of the solid forms of bitumen, particularly ozokerite, are produced.
BITURIGES, a Celtic people, according to Livy (v. 34) the most powerful in Gaul in the time of Tarquinius Priscus. At some period unknown they split up into two branches—Bituriges Cubi and Bituriges Vivisci. The name is supposed to mean either “rulers of the world” or “perpetual kings.”
BITURIGES, a Celtic tribe, according to Livy (v. 34), was the most powerful in Gaul during the time of Tarquinius Priscus. At some point that isn't clear, they divided into two branches—Bituriges Cubi and Bituriges Vivisci. The name is thought to mean either “rulers of the world” or “eternal kings.”
The Bituriges Cubi, called simply Bituriges by Caesar, in whose time they acknowledged the supremacy of the Aedui, inhabited the modern diocese of Bourges, including the departments of Cher and Indre, and partly that of Allier. Their chief towns were Avaricum (Bourges), Argentomagus (Argenton-sur-Creuse), Neriomagus (Néris-les-Bains), Noviodunum (perhaps Villate). At the time of the rebellion of Vercingetoix (52 B.C.), Avaricum, after a desperate resistance, was taken by assault, and the inhabitants put to the sword. In the following year, the Bituriges submitted to Caesar, and under Augustus they were incorporated (in 28 B.C.) in Aquitania. Pliny (Nat. Hist. iv. 109) speaks of them as liberi, which points to their enjoying a certain amount of independence under Roman government. The district contained a number of iron works, and Caesar says they were skilled in driving galleries and mining operations.
The Bituriges Cubi, known simply as Bituriges by Caesar, during whose time they recognized the authority of the Aedui, lived in what is now the diocese of Bourges, including the departments of Cher and Indre, and partly that of Allier. Their main towns were Avaricum (Bourges), Argentomagus (Argenton-sur-Creuse), Neriomagus (Néris-les-Bains), and Noviodunum (probably Villate). When Vercingetorix rebelled (52 B.C.), Avaricum was captured after fierce resistance, and the residents were killed. The following year, the Bituriges surrendered to Caesar, and under Augustus, they were incorporated into Aquitania in 28 B.C. Pliny (Nat. Hist. iv. 109) refers to them as liberi, suggesting they had a degree of independence under Roman rule. The area had several iron works, and Caesar noted that they were skilled in building galleries and mining.
The Biturgies Vivisci occupied the strip of land between the sea and the left bank of the Garonne, comprising the greater part of the modern department of Gironde. Their capital was Burdigala (Bordeaux), even then a place of considerable importance and a wine-growing centre. Like the Cubi, they also are called liberi by Pliny.
The Biturgies Vivisci lived in the area between the sea and the left bank of the Garonne, covering most of what is now the Gironde department. Their capital was Burdigala (Bordeaux), which was already a significant city and a center for wine production. Similar to the Cubi, they are referred to as liberi by Pliny.
See A. Desjardins, Géographie historique de la Gaule romaine, ii. (1876-1893); A. Longnon, Géographie de la Gaule on VIe siècle (1878); A. Hohler, Alt-celtischer Sprachschatz; T.R. Holmes, Caesar’s Conquest of Gaul (1899).
See A. Desjardins, Historical Geography of Roman Gaul, ii. (1876-1893); A. Longnon, Geography of Gaul in the 6th Century (1878); A. Hohler, Old Celtic Vocabulary; T.R. Holmes, Caesar’s Conquest of Gaul (1899).
BITZIUS, ALBRECHT (1797-1854), Swiss novelist, best known by his pet name of “Jeremias Gotthelf,” was born on the 4th of October 1797 at Morat, where his father was pastor. In 1804 the home was moved to Utzenstorf, a village in the Bernese Emmenthal. Here young Bitzius grew up, receiving his early education and consorting with the boys of the village, as well as helping his father to cultivate his glebe. In 1812 he went to complete his education at Bern, and in 1820 was received as a pastor. In 1821 he visited the university of Göttingen, but returned home in 1822 to act as his father’s assistant. On his father’s death (1824) he went in the same capacity to Herzogenbuchsee, and later to Bern (1829). Early in 1831 he went as assistant to the aged pastor of the village of Lützelflüh, in the Upper Emmenthal (between Langnau and Burgdorf), being soon elected his successor (1832) and marrying one of his granddaughters (1833). He spent the rest of his life there, dying on the 22nd of October 1854, and leaving three children (the son was a pastor, the two daughters married pastors). His first work, the Bauernspiegel, appeared in 1837. It purported to be the life of Jeremias Gotthelf, narrated by himself, and this name was later adopted by the author as his pen name. It is a living picture of Bernese (or, strictly speaking, Emmenthal) village life, true to nature, and not attempting to gloss over its defects and failings. It is written (like the rest of his works) in the Bernese dialect of the Emmenthal, though it must be remembered that Bitzius was not (like Auerbach) a peasant by birth, but belonged to the educated classes, so that he reproduces what he had seen and learnt, and not what he had himself personally experienced. The book was a great success, as it was a picture of real life, and not of fancifully beribboned 18th-century villagers. Among his later tales are the Leiden und Freuden eines Schulmeisters (1838-1839), Uli der Knecht (1841), with its continuation, Uli der Pachter (1849), Anne Babi Jowager (1843-1844), Käthi die Grossmutter (1847), Die Käserei in der Vehfreude (1850), and the Erlebnisse eines Schuldenbauers (1854). He published also several volumes of shorter tales. One slight drawback to some of his writings is the echo of local political controversies, for Bitzius was a Whig and strongly opposed to the Radical party in the canton, which carried the day in 1846.
BITZIUS, ALBRECHT (1797-1854), Swiss novelist, is best known by his nickname “Jeremias Gotthelf.” He was born on October 4, 1797, in Morat, where his father was a pastor. In 1804, the family moved to Utzenstorf, a village in the Bernese Emmental. It was here that young Bitzius grew up, received his early education, and spent time with the village boys, as well as helping his father with farming. In 1812, he went to Bern to finish his education and became a pastor in 1820. He visited the University of Göttingen in 1821 but returned home in 1822 to assist his father. After his father passed away in 1824, he took a similar position in Herzogenbuchsee and later moved to Bern in 1829. Early in 1831, he became the assistant to the elderly pastor of Lützelflüh village in Upper Emmental (between Langnau and Burgdorf) and was soon elected as his successor in 1832, marrying one of the pastor's granddaughters in 1833. He spent the rest of his life there, dying on October 22, 1854, and leaving behind three children (his son became a pastor, and both daughters married pastors). His first work, Bauernspiegel, was published in 1837. It claimed to be the life story of Jeremias Gotthelf as told by himself, a name later adopted by the author as his pen name. The book vividly portrays village life in Bernese (or, technically, Emmental) communities, staying true to nature and not hiding its flaws and shortcomings. It is written in the Bernese dialect of Emmental, but it’s important to note that Bitzius was not a peasant like Auerbach but came from the educated classes, meaning he wrote about what he observed and learned, rather than his personal experiences. The book was highly successful because it reflected real life, unlike the fanciful, idealized villagers of the 18th century. Among his later stories are Leiden und Freuden eines Schulmeisters (1838-1839), Uli der Knecht (1841) and its sequel, Uli der Pachter (1849), Anne Babi Jowager (1843-1844), Käthi die Grossmutter (1847), Die Käserei in der Vehfreude (1850), and Erlebnisse eines Schuldenbauers (1854). He also published several volumes of short stories. One minor drawback in some of his writing is the reflection of local political debates, as Bitzius was a Whig and strongly opposed the Radical party in the canton, which won in 1846.
Lives by C. Manuel, in the Berlin edition of Bitzius’s works (Berlin, 1861), and by J. Ammann in vol. i. (Bern, 1884) of the Sammlung Bernischer Biographien. His works were issued in 24 vols. at Berlin, 1856-1861, while 10 vols., giving the original text of each story, were issued at Bern, 1898-1900 (edition not to be completed).
Lives by C. Manuel, in the Berlin edition of Bitzius’s works (Berlin, 1861), and by J. Ammann in vol. i. (Bern, 1884) of the Sammlung Bernischer Biographien. His works were published in 24 volumes in Berlin from 1856 to 1861, while 10 volumes containing the original texts of each story were published in Bern from 1898 to 1900 (this edition is not to be completed).
BIVOUAC (a French word generally said to have been introduced during the Thirty Years’ War, perhaps derived from Beiwacht, extra guard), originally, a night-watch by a whole army under arms to prevent surprise. In modern military parlance the word is used to mean a temporary encampment in the open field without tents, as opposed to “billets” or “cantonment” on the one hand and “camp” on the other. The use of bivouacs permits an army to remain closely concentrated for all emergencies, and avoids the necessity for numerous wagons carrying tents. Constant bivouacs, however, are trying to the health of men and horses, and this method of quartering is never employed except when the military situation demands concentration and readiness. Thus the outposts would often have to bivouac while the main body of the army lay in billets.
BIVOUAC (a French term that is generally believed to have been introduced during the Thirty Years’ War, possibly derived from Beiwacht, meaning extra guard), originally referred to a night watch by an entire army to prevent surprises. In contemporary military language, the term is used to describe a temporary camping setup in the open field without tents, as opposed to “billets” or “cantonment” on one side and “camp” on the other. Using bivouacs allows an army to stay closely grouped for quick responses to emergencies and reduces the need for many wagons to transport tents. However, constant bivouacking can be hard on the health of both soldiers and horses, and this method is only used when the military situation requires concentration and readiness. Therefore, outposts would often have to bivouac while the main body of the army rested in billets.
BIWA, a lake in the province of Omi, Japan. It measures 36 m. in length by 12 m. in extreme breadth, has an area of 180 sq. m., is about 330 ft. above sea-level, and has an extreme depth of some 300 ft. There are a few small islands in the lake, the principal being Chikubu-shima at the northern end.
BIWA, is a lake in Omi province, Japan. It measures 36 meters long and 12 meters wide at its widest point, covering an area of 180 square meters. The lake is about 330 feet above sea level and has a maximum depth of around 300 feet. There are a few small islands in the lake, with the main one being Chikubu-shima, located at the northern end.
Tradition alleges that Lake Biwa and the mountain of Fuji were produced simultaneously by an earthquake in 286 B.C. On the west of the lake the mountains Hiei-zan and Hira-yama slope down almost to its margin, and on the east a wide plain extends towards the boundaries of the province of Mino. It is drained by a river flowing out of its southern end, and taking its course into the sea at Osaka. This river bears in succession the names of Seta-gawa, Uji-gawa and Yodo-gawa. The lake abounds with fish, and the beauty of its scenery is remarkable. Small steamboats ply constantly to the points of chief interest, and around its shores are to be viewed the Omi-no-hakkei, or “eight landscapes of Omi”; namely, the lake silvering under an autumn moon as one looks down from Ishi-yama; the snow at eve on Hira-yama; the glow of sunset at Seta; the groves and classic temple of Mii-dera as the evening bell sounds; boats sailing home from Yabase; cloudless peaks at Awazu; rain at nightfall over Karasaki; and wild geese sweeping down to Katata. The lake is connected with Kyoto by a canal constructed in 1890, and is thus brought into water communication with Osaka.
Tradition says that Lake Biwa and Mount Fuji were formed at the same time by an earthquake in 286 B.C. To the west of the lake, the mountains Hiei-zan and Hira-yama slope down almost to its edge, while to the east, a wide plain stretches towards the borders of Mino province. The lake is drained by a river that flows out of its southern end and heads toward the sea at Osaka. This river is known as Seta-gawa, then Uji-gawa, and finally Yodo-gawa. The lake is rich in fish, and its scenery is stunning. Small steamboats constantly travel to the main points of interest, and along its shores, you can see the Omi-no-hakkei, or “eight landscapes of Omi,” which include the lake shimmering under an autumn moon as seen from Ishi-yama, the evening snow on Hira-yama, the sunset glow at Seta, the groves and historic temple of Mii-dera as the evening bell rings, boats returning from Yabase, clear peaks at Awazu, rain at dusk over Karasaki, and wild geese descending to Katata. The lake is linked to Kyoto by a canal built in 1890, creating a water route to Osaka.
BIXIO, NINO (1821-1873), Italian soldier, was born on the 2nd of October 1821. While still a boy he was compelled by his parents to embrace a maritime career. After numerous adventures he returned to Italy in 1846, joined the Giovine Italia, and, on 4th November 1847, made himself conspicuous at Genoa by seizing the bridle of Charles Albert’s horse and crying, “Pass the Ticino, Sire, and we are all with you.” He fought through the campaign of 1848, became captain under Garibaldi at Rome in 1849, taking prisoners an entire French battalion, and gaining the gold medal for military valour. In 1859 he commanded a Garibaldian battalion, and gained the military cross of Savoy. Joining the Marsala expedition in 1860, he turned the day in favour of Garibaldi at Calatafimi, was wounded at Palermo, but recovered in time to besiege Reggio in Calabria (21st of August 1860), and, though again wounded, took part in the battle of Volturno, where his leg was broken. Elected deputy in 1861, he endeavoured to reconcile Cavour and Garibaldi. In 1866, at the head of the seventh division, he covered the Italian retreat from Custozza, ignoring the Austrian summons to surrender. Created senator in February 1870, he was in the following September given command of a division during the movement against Rome, took Cività Vecchia, and participated in the general attack upon Rome (20th September 1870). He died of cholera at Achin Bay in Sumatra en route for Batavia, whither he 16 had gone in command of a commercial expedition (16th December 1873).
BIXIO, NINO (1821-1873), an Italian soldier, was born on October 2, 1821. As a boy, his parents pushed him to pursue a career at sea. After many adventures, he returned to Italy in 1846, joined the Giovine Italia, and on November 4, 1847, made a name for himself in Genoa by grabbing the reins of Charles Albert’s horse and shouting, “Cross the Ticino, Your Majesty, and we’re all with you.” He fought in the 1848 campaign, became a captain under Garibaldi in Rome in 1849, captured an entire French battalion, and earned a gold medal for military courage. In 1859, he led a Garibaldian battalion and received the military cross of Savoy. He joined the Marsala expedition in 1860, helped turn the tide in favor of Garibaldi at Calatafimi, was wounded in Palermo, but healed in time to lay siege to Reggio in Calabria (August 21, 1860), and despite being wounded again, participated in the battle of Volturno where he broke his leg. Elected as a deputy in 1861, he tried to bring Cavour and Garibaldi together. In 1866, leading the seventh division, he covered the Italian retreat from Custozza, refusing the Austrian demand to surrender. Appointed senator in February 1870, he was given command of a division during the campaign against Rome in September, captured Cività Vecchia, and took part in the assault on Rome (September 20, 1870). He died of cholera at Achin Bay in Sumatra en route to Batavia, where he had gone to lead a commercial expedition (December 16, 1873).
BIZERTA (properly pronounced Ben Zert; Fr. Bizerte), a seaport of Tunisia, in 37° 17′ N., 9° 50′ E. Pop. about 12,000. Next to Toulon, Bizerta is the most important naval port of France in the Mediterranean. It occupies a commanding strategical position in the narrowest part of the sea, being 714 m. E. of Gibraltar, 1168 m. W.N.W. of Port Said, 240 m. N.W. of Malta, and 420 m. S. by E. of Toulon. It is 60 m. by rail N.N.W. of Tunis. The town is built on the shores of the Mediterranean at the point where the Lake of Bizerta enters the sea through a natural channel, the mouth of which has been canalized. The modern town lies almost entirely on the north side of the canal. A little farther north are the ancient citadel, the walled “Arab” town and the old harbour (disused). The present outer harbour covers about 300 acres and is formed by two converging jetties and a breakwater. The north jetty is 4000 ft. long, the east jetty 3300 ft., and the breakwater—which protects the port from the prevalent north-east winds—2300 ft. long. The entrance to the canal is in the centre of the outer harbour. The canal is 2600 ft. long and 787 ft. wide on the surface. Its banks are lined with quays, and ships drawing 26 ft. of water can moor alongside. At the end of the canal is a large commercial harbour, beyond which the channel opens into the lake—in reality an arm of the sea—roughly circular in form and covering about 50 sq. m., two-thirds of its waters having a depth of 30 to 40 ft. The lake, which merchant vessels are not allowed to enter, contains the naval port and arsenal. There is a torpedo and submarine boat station on the north side of the channel at the entrance to the lake, but the principal naval works are at Sidi Abdallah at the south-west corner of the lake and 10 m. from the open sea. Here is an enclosed basin covering 123 acres with ample quayage, dry docks and everything necessary to the accommodation, repair, revictualling and coaling of a numerous fleet. Barracks, hospitals and waterworks have been built, the military town, called Ferryville, being self-contained.
Bizerte (pronounced Ben Zert; Fr. Bizerte), a seaport in Tunisia, located at 37° 17′ N., 9° 50′ E. Population: around 12,000. After Toulon, Bizerta is the second most important naval port for France in the Mediterranean. It has a strategic location at the narrowest part of the sea, being 714 m. east of Gibraltar, 1168 m. west-northwest of Port Said, 240 m. northwest of Malta, and 420 m. south by east of Toulon. It is 60 m. by rail north-northwest of Tunis. The town is situated on the Mediterranean coast, where the Lake of Bizerta flows into the sea through a natural channel, which has been modified for navigation. The modern town mainly lies on the north side of the canal. A bit further north are the ancient citadel, the walled "Arab" town, and the old harbor (now unused). The current outer harbor spans about 300 acres and is created by two converging jetties and a breakwater. The north jetty measures 4000 ft., the east jetty 3300 ft., and the breakwater, which shields the port from the common northeast winds, is 2300 ft. long. The canal's entrance is in the center of the outer harbor. The canal itself is 2600 ft. long and 787 ft. wide at the surface. Its banks are lined with quays, allowing ships with a draft of 26 ft. to dock. At the canal's end is a large commercial harbor, beyond which the channel leads into the lake—a roughly circular area covering about 50 sq. m., with two-thirds of its waters measuring 30 to 40 ft. deep. Merchant vessels are prohibited from entering the lake, which contains the naval port and arsenal. A torpedo and submarine boat station is located on the north side of the channel at the lake's entrance, but the main naval facilities are found at Sidi Abdallah, at the southwest corner of the lake, 10 m. from the open sea. This area includes an enclosed basin covering 123 acres, equipped with sufficient quayage, dry docks, and all the necessary facilities for managing, repairing, restocking, and refueling a large fleet. Barracks, hospitals, and waterworks have been constructed, and the military settlement, known as Ferryville, is fully self-sufficient.
Fortifications have been built for the protection of the port. They comprise (a) the older works surrounding the town; (b) a group of coast batteries on the high ground of Cape Bizerta or Guardia, 4 m. north-north-west of the town; these are grouped round a powerful fort called Jebel Kebir, and have a command of 300 to 800 ft. above sea-level; (c) another group of batteries on the narrow ground between the sea and the lake to the east of the town; the highest of these is the Jebel Tuila battery 265 ft. above sea-level.
Fortifications have been constructed to protect the port. They include (a) the older structures surrounding the town; (b) a set of coastal batteries on the elevated terrain of Cape Bizerta or Guardia, 4 miles north-northwest of the town; these are centered around a strong fort called Jebel Kebir, and they have an elevation of 300 to 800 feet above sea level; (c) another group of batteries on the narrow land between the sea and the lake to the east of the town; the tallest of these is the Jebel Tuila battery, which is 265 feet above sea level.
The Lake of Bizerta, called Tinja by the Arabs, abounds in excellent fish, especially mullets, the dried roe of which, called botargo, is largely exported, and the fishing industry employs a large proportion of the inhabitants. The western shore of the lake is low, and in many places is covered with olive trees to the water’s edge. The south-eastern shores are hilly and wooded, and behind them rises a range of picturesque hills. A narrow and shallow channel leads from the western side of the lake into another sheet of water, the Lake of Ishkul, so called from Jebel Ishkul, a hill on its southern bank 1740 ft. high. The Lake of Ishkul is nearly as large as the first lake, but is very shallow. Its waters are generally sweet.
The Bizerte Lake, known as Tinja by the Arabs, is filled with great fish, especially mullets. The dried roe, called botargo, is largely exported, and fishing provides jobs for many locals. The western shore of the lake is low and often lined with olive trees down to the water’s edge. The southeastern shores are hilly and wooded, with a range of beautiful hills rising behind them. A narrow and shallow channel connects the western side of the lake to another body of water, the Lake of Ishkul, named after Jebel Ishkul, a hill on its southern bank that stands 1740 ft. high. The Lake of Ishkul is almost as large as the first lake but is very shallow, and its waters are usually fresh.
Bizerta occupies the site of the ancient Tyrian colony, Hippo Zarytus or Diarrhytus, the harbour of which, by means of a spacious pier, protecting it from the north-east wind, was rendered one of the safest and finest on this coast. The town became a Roman colony, and was conquered by the Arabs in the 7th century. The place thereafter was subject either to the rulers of Tunis or of Constantine, but the citizens were noted for their frequent revolts. They threw in their lot (c. 1530) with the pirate Khair-ed-Din, and subsequently received a Turkish garrison. Bizerta was captured by the Spaniards in 1535, but not long afterwards came under the Tunisian government. Centuries of neglect followed, and the ancient port was almost choked up, though the value of the fisheries saved the town from utter decay. Its strategical importance was one of the causes which led to the occupation of Tunisia by the French in 1881. In 1890 a concession for a new canal and harbour was granted to a company, and five years later the new port was formally opened. Since then the canal has been widened and deepened, and the naval port at Sidi Abdallah created.
Bizerta is located where the ancient Tyrian colony, Hippo Zarytus or Diarrhytus, once stood. Its harbor, protected by a large pier from the northeast wind, became one of the safest and best on this coast. The town became a Roman colony and was taken over by the Arabs in the 7th century. After that, it was governed by either the rulers of Tunis or Constantine, but the citizens were known for their frequent uprisings. Around 1530, they allied with the pirate Khair-ed-Din and later received a Turkish garrison. Bizerta was captured by the Spaniards in 1535, but shortly afterward, it fell under Tunisian control. The town experienced centuries of neglect, and the ancient port nearly became unusable, although the fisheries helped prevent its complete decay. Its strategic importance contributed to the French occupation of Tunisia in 1881. In 1890, a concession to build a new canal and harbor was awarded to a company, and five years later, the new port officially opened. Since then, the canal has been expanded and deepened, and a naval port at Sidi Abdallah was established.
BIZET [Alexandre César Léopold] GEORGES (1838-1875), French musical composer, was born at Bougival, near Paris, on the 25th of October 1838, the son of a singing-master. He displayed musical ability at an early age, and was sent to the Paris Conservatoire, where he studied under Halévy and speedily distinguished himself, carrying off prizes for organ and fugue, and finally in 1857, after an ineffectual attempt in the previous year, the Grand Prix de Rome for a cantata called Cloris et Clotilde. A success of a different kind also befell him at this time. Offenbach, then manager of the Théâtre des Bouffes-Parisiens, had organized a competition for an operetta, in which young Bizet was awarded the first prize in conjunction with Charles Lecocq, each of them writing an operetta called Docteur Miracle. After the three years spent in Rome, an obligation imposed by the French government on the winners of the first prize at the Conservatoire, Bizet returned to Paris, where he achieved a reputation as a pianist and accompanist. On the 23rd of September 1863 his first opera, Les Pêcheurs de perles, was brought out at the Théâtre Lyrique, but owing possibly to the somewhat uninteresting nature of the story, the opera did not enjoy a very long run. The qualities displayed by the composer, however, were amply recognized, although the music was stated, by some critics, to exhibit traces of Wagnerian influence. Wagnerism at that period was a sort of spectre that haunted the imagination of many leading members of the musical press. It sufficed for a work to be at all out of the common for the epithet “Wagnerian” to be applied to it. The term, it may be said, was intended to be condemnatory, and it was applied with little understanding as to its real meaning. The score of the Pêcheurs de perles contains several charming numbers; its dreamy melodies are well adapted to fit a story laid in Eastern climes, and the music reveals a decided dramatic temperament. Some of its dances are now usually introduced into the fourth act of Carmen.
BIZET [Alexandre César Léopold] GEORGE (1838-1875), French composer, was born in Bougival, near Paris, on October 25, 1838, the son of a singing teacher. He showed musical talent early on and was sent to the Paris Conservatoire, where he studied under Halévy and quickly made a name for himself, winning prizes for organ and fugue, and finally in 1857, after an unsuccessful attempt the previous year, the Grand Prix de Rome for a cantata called Cloris et Clotilde. He also experienced a different kind of success around this time. Offenbach, who was then managing the Théâtre des Bouffes-Parisiens, held a competition for an operetta, and young Bizet won first prize along with Charles Lecocq, with each of them writing an operetta titled Docteur Miracle. After spending three years in Rome, a requirement set by the French government for the winners of the first prize at the Conservatoire, Bizet returned to Paris, where he gained a reputation as a pianist and accompanist. On September 23, 1863, his first opera, Les Pêcheurs de perles, premiered at the Théâtre Lyrique, but likely due to the rather unengaging storyline, the opera did not have a long run. However, the composer’s talent was well acknowledged, though some critics noted that the music showed hints of Wagnerian influence. During that time, Wagnerism was like a ghost that haunted the imagination of many prominent members of the music press. It was enough for a work to be somewhat unconventional for it to be labeled “Wagnerian.” The term was often meant as a criticism and was applied with little understanding of its true meaning. The score of Pêcheurs de perles includes several delightful pieces; its dreamy melodies suit the story set in Eastern lands, and the music shows a clear dramatic flair. Some of its dances are now typically included in the fourth act of Carmen.
On the 3rd of June 1865 Bizet married a daughter of his old master, Halévy. His second opera, La Jolie Fitte de Perth, produced at the Théâtre Lyrique on 26th December 1867, was scarcely a step in advance. The libretto was founded on Sir Walter Scott’s novel, but the opera lacks unity of style, and its pages are marred by concessions to the vocalist. One number has survived, the characteristic Bohemian dance which has been interpolated into the fourth act of Carmen. In his third opera Bizet returned to an oriental subject. Djamileh, a one-act opera given at the Opéra Comique on the 22nd of May 1872, is certainly one of his most individual efforts. Again were accusations of Wagnerism hurled at the composer’s head, and Djamileh did not achieve the success it undoubtedly deserved. The composer was more fortunate with the incidental music he wrote to Alphonse Daudet’s drama, L’Arlésienne, produced in October 1872. Different numbers from this, arranged in the form of suites, have often been heard in the concert-room. Rarely have poetry and imagination been so well allied as in these exquisite pages, which seem to reflect the sunny skies of Provence.
On June 3, 1865, Bizet married the daughter of his old mentor, Halévy. His second opera, La Jolie Fitte de Perth, premiered at the Théâtre Lyrique on December 26, 1867, and it didn’t really make much progress. The libretto was based on Sir Walter Scott’s novel, but the opera lacks a consistent style, and its sections are compromised by demands for the singers. One piece has stood the test of time: the distinctive Bohemian dance that was added to the fourth act of Carmen. For his third opera, Bizet chose an oriental theme. Djamileh, a one-act opera performed at the Opéra Comique on May 22, 1872, is definitely one of his most unique works. The composer faced more accusations of Wagner influence, and Djamileh did not receive the recognition it truly deserved. However, Bizet had better luck with the incidental music he composed for Alphonse Daudet’s play, L’Arlésienne, which was produced in October 1872. Various selections from this have often been performed as suites in concert halls. It’s rare to find poetry and imagination so beautifully combined as in these lovely pieces, which seem to capture the sunny skies of Provence.
Bizet’s masterpiece, Carmen, was brought out at the Opéra Comique on the 3rd of March 1875. It was based on a version by Meilhac and Halévy of a study by Prosper Mérimée—in which the dramatic element was obscured by much descriptive writing. The detection of the drama underlying this psychological narrative was in itself a brilliant discovery, and in reconstructing the story in dramatic form the authors produced one of the most famous libretti in the whole range of opera. Still more striking than the libretto was the music composed by Bizet, in which the peculiar use of the flute and of the lowest notes of the harp deserves particular attention.
Bizet’s masterpiece, Carmen, premiered at the Opéra Comique on March 3, 1875. It was based on a version by Meilhac and Halévy of a story by Prosper Mérimée—in which the dramatic aspect was overshadowed by excessive description. Recognizing the drama within this psychological narrative was an impressive insight, and by transforming the story into a dramatic format, the authors created one of the most famous libretti in the entire opera repertoire. Even more remarkable than the libretto was the music composed by Bizet, which features a unique use of the flute and the lowest notes of the harp that deserves special attention.
On the 3rd of June, three months after the production of Carmen in Paris, the genial composer expired after a few hours’ illness from a heart affection. Before dying he had the satisfaction 17 of knowing that Carmen had been accepted for production at Vienna. After the Austrian capital came Brussels, Berlin and, in 1878, London, when Carmen was brought out at Her Majesty’s theatre with immense success. The influence exercised by Bizet on dramatic music has been very great, and may be discerned in the realistic works of the young Italian school, as well as in those of his own countrymen.
On June 3rd, three months after the premiere of Carmen in Paris, the talented composer passed away after a brief illness caused by heart problems. Before he died, he took comfort in knowing that Carmen had been approved for production in Vienna. After Vienna, it moved to Brussels, Berlin, and in 1878, London, where Carmen premiered at Her Majesty’s theatre to great acclaim. Bizet's influence on dramatic music has been substantial and can be seen in the realistic works of the young Italian composers, as well as those of his fellow countrymen.
BJÖRNEBORG (Finnish, Pori), a district town of Finland, province of Åbo-Björneborg, on the E. coast of the Gulf of Bothnia, at the mouth of the Kumo. Lat. 51° 8′ N., long. 46° 0′ E. Pop. (1904) 16,053, mostly Swedes. Large vessels cannot enter its roadstead, and stop at Räfsö. The town has shipbuilding wharves, machine works, and several tanneries and brick-works, and has a total trade of over 16,000,000 marks, the chief export being timber.
BJÖRNEBORG (Finnish, Pori), is a district town in Finland, located in the province of Åbo-Björneborg, on the eastern coast of the Gulf of Bothnia, at the mouth of the Kumo River. Latitude 51° 8′ N., longitude 46° 0′ E. The population in 1904 was 16,053, mostly Swedish. Large ships cannot access its harbor and instead dock at Räfsö. The town features shipbuilding docks, machine shops, and several tanneries and brickworks, with a total trade exceeding 16,000,000 marks, primarily exporting timber.
BJÖRNSON, BJÖRNSTJERNE (1832-1910), Norwegian poet, novelist and dramatist, was born on the 8th of December 1832 at the farmstead of Björngen, in Kvikne, in Österdal, Norway. In 1837 his father, who had been pastor of Kvikne, was transferred to the parish of Noesset, in Romsdal; in this romantic district the childhood of Björnson was spent. After some teaching at the neighbouring town of Molde, he was sent at the age of seventeen to a well-known school in Christiania to study for the university; his instinct for poetry was already awakened, and indeed he had written verses from his eleventh year. He matriculated at the university of Christiania in 1852, and soon began to work as a journalist, especially as a dramatic critic. In 1857 appeared Synnöve Solbakken, the first of Björnson’s peasant-novels; in 1858 this was followed by Arne, in 1860 by A Happy Boy, and in 1868 by The Fisher Maiden. These are the most important specimens of his bonde-fortaellinger or peasant-tales—a section of his literary work which has made a profound impression in his own country, and has made him popular throughout the world. Two of the tales, Arne and Synnöve Solbakken, offer perhaps finer examples of the pure peasant-story than are to be found elsewhere in literature.
BJÖRNSON, BJÖRNSTJERNE (1832-1910), Norwegian poet, novelist, and playwright, was born on December 8, 1832, at the Björngen farm in Kvikne, Österdal, Norway. In 1837, his father, who had been the pastor of Kvikne, was moved to the parish of Noesset in Romsdal; it was in this picturesque area that Björnson spent his childhood. After some teaching in the nearby town of Molde, he was sent at seventeen to a well-known school in Christiania to prepare for university; his talent for poetry was already emerging, and he had been writing verses since he was eleven. He enrolled at the University of Christiania in 1852 and quickly began working as a journalist, particularly as a drama critic. In 1857, he published Synnöve Solbakken, the first of Björnson's peasant novels; this was followed by Arne in 1858, A Happy Boy in 1860, and The Fisher Maiden in 1868. These works are the most significant examples of his bonde-fortaellinger or peasant tales—a genre in his literary oeuvre that has left a lasting impact in his home country and gained him recognition worldwide. Two of the tales, Arne and Synnöve Solbakken, are considered some of the finest examples of the pure peasant story found in literature.
Björnson was anxious “to create a new saga in the light of the peasant,” as he put it, and he thought this should be done, not merely in prose fiction, but in national dramas or folke-stykker. The earliest of these was a one-act piece the scene of which is laid in the 12th century, Between the Battles, was written in 1855, but not produced until 1857. He was especially influenced at this time by the study of Baggesen and Ochlenschläger, during a visit to Copenhagen 1856-1857. Between the Battles was followed by Lame Hulda in 1858, and King Sverre in 1861. All these efforts, however, were far excelled by the splendid trilogy of Sigurd the Bastard, which Björnson issued in 1862. This raised him to the front rank among the younger poets of Europe. His Sigurd the Crusader should be added to the category of these heroic plays, although it was not printed until 1872.
Björnson was eager “to create a new saga in the spirit of the peasant,” as he said, and he believed this should happen not only in prose fiction but also in national dramas or folke-stykker. The first of these was a one-act play set in the 12th century, Between the Battles, which he wrote in 1855 but wasn’t performed until 1857. At this time, he was particularly influenced by studying Baggesen and Ochlenschläger during a visit to Copenhagen from 1856 to 1857. Between the Battles was followed by Lame Hulda in 1858 and King Sverre in 1861. However, all these works were overshadowed by the magnificent trilogy of Sigurd the Bastard, which Björnson published in 1862. This elevated him to the forefront among the younger poets in Europe. His Sigurd the Crusader should also be included in this heroic play category, even though it wasn’t printed until 1872.
At the close of 1857 Björnson had been appointed director of the theatre at Bergen, a post which he held, with much journalistic work, for two years, when he returned to the capital. From 1860 to 1863 he travelled widely throughout Europe. Early in 1865 he undertook the management of the Christiania theatre, and brought out his popular comedy of The Newly Married and his romantic tragedy of Mary Stuart in Scotland. Although Björnson has introduced into his novels and plays songs of extraordinary beauty, he was never a very copious writer of verse; in 1870 he published his Poems and Songs and the epic cycle called Arnljot Gelline; the latter volume contains the magnificent ode called “Bergliot,” Björnson’s finest contribution to lyrical poetry. Between 1864 and 1874, in the very prime of life, Björnson displayed a slackening of the intellectual forces very remarkable in a man of his energy; he was indeed during these years mainly occupied with politics, and with his business as a theatrical manager. This was the period of Björnson’s most fiery propaganda as a radical agitator. In 1871 he began to supplement his journalistic work in this direction by delivering lectures over the length and breadth of the northern countries. He possessed to a surprising degree the arts of the orator, combined with a magnificent physical prestige. From 1873 to 1876 Björnson was absent from Norway, and in the peace of voluntary exile he recovered his imaginative powers. His new departure as a dramatic author began with A Bankruptcy and The Editor in 1874, social dramas of an extremely modern and realistic cast.
At the end of 1857, Björnson was appointed director of the theater in Bergen, a position he held, while also doing a lot of journalism, for two years before returning to the capital. From 1860 to 1863, he traveled extensively across Europe. In early 1865, he took over the management of the Christiania theater and produced his popular comedy The Newly Married and his romantic tragedy Mary Stuart in Scotland. Although Björnson included beautifully written songs in his novels and plays, he was never a prolific poet; in 1870, he published Poems and Songs and the epic cycle Arnljot Gelline; the latter contains the magnificent ode “Bergliot,” which is Björnson’s greatest contribution to lyrical poetry. Between 1864 and 1874, in the height of his life, Björnson showed a noticeable decline in his intellectual vigor, which was unusual for someone with his energy; during these years, he focused mainly on politics and his work as a theater manager. This was the time of Björnson’s most passionate activism as a radical agitator. In 1871, he began to enhance his journalistic efforts by giving lectures throughout the northern countries. He had a remarkable talent for oratory, combined with impressive physical presence. From 1873 to 1876, Björnson was away from Norway, and during this self-imposed exile, he regained his creative powers. His new phase as a dramatic writer started with A Bankruptcy and The Editor in 1874, which were social dramas of a very modern and realistic nature.
The poet now settled on his estate of Aulestad in Gausdal. In 1877 he published another novel, Magnhild—an imperfect production, in which his ideas on social questions were seen to be in a state of fermentation, and gave expression to his republican sentiments in the polemical play called The King, to a later edition of which he prefixed an essay on “Intellectual Freedom,” in further explanation of his position. Captain Mansana, an episode of the war of Italian independence, belongs to 1878. Extremely anxious to obtain a full success on the stage, Björnson concentrated his powers on a drama of social life, Leonardo (1879), which raised a violent controversy. A satirical play, The New System, was produced a few weeks later. Although these plays of Björnson’s second period were greatly discussed, none of them (except A Bankruptcy) pleased on the boards. When once more he produced a social drama, A Gauntlet, in 1883, he was unable to persuade any manager to stage it, except in a modified form, though this play gives the full measure of his power as a dramatist. In the autumn of the same year, Björnson published a mystical or symbolic drama Beyond our Powers, dealing with the abnormal features of religious excitement with extraordinary force; this was not acted until 1899, when it achieved a great success.
The poet settled on his estate, Aulestad, in Gausdal. In 1877, he published another novel, Magnhild—an imperfect work that reflected his evolving ideas on social issues and expressed his republican views in the controversial play The King, to which he added an essay on “Intellectual Freedom” in a later edition to clarify his stance. Captain Mansana, a story from the Italian independence war, was released in 1878. Eager to achieve significant success on stage, Björnson focused his efforts on a social drama, Leonardo (1879), which sparked intense debate. A satirical play, The New System, premiered a few weeks later. Although these plays from Björnson’s second period generated much discussion, none of them (except A Bankruptcy) were successful on stage. When he tried again with a social drama, A Gauntlet, in 1883, he struggled to find a manager willing to produce it in its full form, though it showcased the depth of his talent as a playwright. In the fall of the same year, Björnson published a mystical or symbolic drama, Beyond our Powers, which addressed the unusual aspects of religious fervor with remarkable intensity; it was not performed until 1899, when it achieved great success.
Meanwhile, Björnson’s political attitude had brought upon him a charge of high treason, and he took refuge for a time in Germany, returning to Norway in 1882. Convinced that the theatre was practically closed to him, he turned back to the novel, and published in 1884, Flags are Flying in Town and Port, embodying his theories on heredity and education. In 1889 he printed another long and still more remarkable novel, In God’s Way, which is chiefly concerned with the same problems. The same year saw the publication of a comedy, Geography and Love, which continues to be played with success. A number of short stories, of a more or less didactic character, dealing with startling points of emotional experience, were collected in 1894; among them those which produced the greatest sensation were Dust, Mother’s Hands, and Absalom’s Hair. Later plays were a political tragedy called Paul Lange and Tora Parsberg (1898), a second part of Beyond our Powers (1895), Laboremus (1901), At Storhove (1902), and Daglannet (1904). In 1899, at the opening of the National theatre, Björnson received an ovation, and his saga-drama of Sigurd the Crusader was performed.
Meanwhile, Björnson's political views had led to a charge of high treason, prompting him to seek refuge in Germany for a time. He returned to Norway in 1882. Believing that the theatre was essentially closed off to him, he returned to writing novels and published Flags are Flying in Town and Port in 1884, which expressed his ideas on heredity and education. In 1889, he released another significant novel, In God’s Way, which primarily addressed similar themes. That same year, he published a comedy titled Geography and Love, which continues to be performed successfully. A collection of short stories, some with a didactic tone focusing on intense emotional experiences, was published in 1894; among these, the most impactful were Dust, Mother’s Hands, and Absalom’s Hair. His later works included a political tragedy called Paul Lange and Tora Parsberg (1898), a sequel to Beyond our Powers (1895), Laboremus (1901), At Storhove (1902), and Daglannet (1904). In 1899, during the opening of the National Theatre, Björnson received a warm welcome, and his saga-drama Sigurd the Crusader was performed.
A subject which interested him greatly, and on which he occupied his indefatigable pen, was the question of the bonde-maal, the adopting of a national language for Norway distinct from the dansk-norsk (Dano-Norwegian), in which her literature has hitherto been written. Björnson’s strong and sometimes rather narrow patriotism did not blind him to the fatal folly of such a proposal, and his lectures and pamphlets against the maal-straev in its extreme form did more than anything else to save the language in this dangerous moment. Björnson was one of the original members of the Nobel committee, and was re-elected in 1900. In 1903 he was awarded the Nobel prize for literature. Björnson had done as much as any other man to rouse Norwegian national feeling, but in 1903, on the verge of the rupture between Norway and Sweden, he preached conciliation and moderation to the Norwegians. He was an eloquent advocate of Pan-Germanism, and, writing to the Figaro in 1905, he outlined a Pan-Germanic alliance of northern Europe and North America. He died on the 26th of April 1910.
A topic that deeply interested him, and one that he tirelessly wrote about, was the question of the bonde-maal, the adoption of a national language for Norway distinct from the dansk-norsk (Dano-Norwegian), which had been used for its literature up until then. Björnson’s strong and sometimes rather narrow patriotism didn’t blind him to the serious mistake of such a proposal, and his lectures and pamphlets against the maal-straev in its extreme form did more than anything else to protect the language in this critical time. Björnson was one of the founding members of the Nobel committee and was re-elected in 1900. In 1903, he received the Nobel Prize for Literature. Björnson had done as much as anyone to inspire Norwegian national pride, but in 1903, on the brink of the split between Norway and Sweden, he urged conciliation and moderation to the Norwegians. He was an eloquent supporter of Pan-Germanism and, in a letter to the Figaro in 1905, he proposed a Pan-Germanic alliance of Northern Europe and North America. He passed away on April 26, 1910.
See Björnson’s Samlede Vaerker (Copenhagen, 1900-1902, 11 vols.); The Novels of Björnstjerne Björnson (1894, &c.), edited by Edmund Gosse; G. Brandes, Critical Studies (1899); E. Tissot, Le drame norvégien (1893); C.D. af Wirsén, Kritiker (1901); Chr. Collin, Björnstjerne Björnson (2 vols., German ed., 1903), the most complete biography and criticism at present available; and B. Halvorsen, Norsk Forfatter Lexikon (1885).
See Björnson’s Samlede Vaerker (Copenhagen, 1900-1902, 11 vols.); The Novels of Björnstjerne Björnson (1894, &c.), edited by Edmund Gosse; G. Brandes, Critical Studies (1899); E. Tissot, Le drame norvégien (1893); C.D. af Wirsén, Kritiker (1901); Chr. Collin, Björnstjerne Björnson (2 vols., German ed., 1903), the most complete biography and criticism currently available; and B. Halvorsen, Norsk Forfatter Lexikon (1885).
BLACHFORD, FREDERIC ROGERS, Baron (1811-1889), British civil servant, eldest son of Sir Frederick Leman Rogers, 7th Bart. (whom he succeeded in the baronetcy in 1851), was 18 born in London on the 31st of January 1811. He was educated at Eton and Oriel college, Oxford, where he had a brilliant career, winning the Craven University scholarship, and taking a double first-class in classics and mathematics. He became a fellow of Oriel (1833), and won the Vinerian scholarship (1834), and fellowship (1840). He was called to the bar in 1837, but never practised. At school and at Oxford he was a contemporary of W.E. Gladstone, and at Oxford he began a lifelong friendship with J.H. Newman and R.W. Church; his classical and literary tastes, and his combination of liberalism in politics with High Church views in religion, together with his good social position and interesting character, made him an admired member of their circles. For two or three years (1841-1844) he wrote for The Times, and he helped to found The Guardian in 1846; he also did a good deal to assist the Tractarian movement. But he eventually settled down to the life of a government official. He began in 1844 as registrar of joint-stock companies, and in 1846 became commissioner of lands and emigration. Between 1857 and 1859 he was engaged in government missions abroad, connected with colonial questions, and in 1860 he was appointed permanent under-secretary of state for the colonies. Sir Frederic Rogers was the guiding spirit of the colonial office under six successive secretaries of state, and on his retirement in 1871 was raised to the peerage as Baron Blachford of Wisdome, a title taken from his place in Devonshire. He died on the 21st of November 1889.
BLACHFORD, FREDERIC ROGERS, Baron (1811-1889), British civil servant, the eldest son of Sir Frederick Leman Rogers, 7th Bart. (who he succeeded in the baronetcy in 1851), was born in London on January 31, 1811. He was educated at Eton and Oriel College, Oxford, where he had a remarkable career, winning the Craven University scholarship and achieving a double first-class in classics and mathematics. He became a fellow of Oriel (1833), won the Vinerian scholarship (1834), and fellowship (1840). He was called to the bar in 1837 but never practiced. At school and at Oxford, he was a contemporary of W.E. Gladstone, and at Oxford, he began a lifelong friendship with J.H. Newman and R.W. Church; his classical and literary interests, along with his blend of liberal politics and High Church beliefs, combined with his good social standing and intriguing character, made him a respected member of their circles. For two or three years (1841-1844), he wrote for The Times and helped to establish The Guardian in 1846; he also contributed significantly to the Tractarian movement. However, he eventually settled into the role of a government official. He started in 1844 as the registrar of joint-stock companies and became the commissioner of lands and emigration in 1846. From 1857 to 1859, he was involved in government missions abroad related to colonial issues, and in 1860, he was appointed permanent under-secretary of state for the colonies. Sir Frederic Rogers was the driving force behind the colonial office under six consecutive secretaries of state, and upon his retirement in 1871, he was elevated to the peerage as Baron Blachford of Wisdome, a title derived from his location in Devonshire. He passed away on November 21, 1889.
A volume of his letters, edited by G.E. Marindin (1896), contains an interesting Life, partly autobiographical.
A collection of his letters, edited by G.E. Marindin (1896), includes an intriguing Life, which is partly autobiographical.
BLACK, ADAM (1784-1874), Scottish publisher, founder of the firm of A. & C. Black, the son of a builder, was born in Edinburgh on the 20th of February 1784. After serving his apprenticeship to the bookselling trade in Edinburgh and London, he began business for himself in Edinburgh in 1808. By 1826 he was recognized as one of the principal booksellers in the city; and a few years later he was joined in business by his nephew Charles. The two most important events connected with the history of the firm were the publication of the 7th, 8th and 9th editions of the Encyclopaedia Brittannica, and the purchase of the stock and copyright of the Waverley Novels. The copyright of the Encyclopaedia passed into the hands of Adam Black and a few friends in 1827. In 1851 the firm bought the copyright of the Waverley Novels for £27,000; and in 1861 they became the proprietors of De Quincey’s works. Adam Black was twice lord provost of Edinburgh, and represented the city in parliament from 1856 to 1865. He retired from business in 1865, and died on the 24th of January 1874. He was succeeded by his sons, who removed their business in 1895 to London. There is a bronze statue of Adam Black in East Princes Street Gardens, Edinburgh.
BLACK, ADAM (1784-1874), Scottish publisher and founder of the firm A. & C. Black, was born in Edinburgh on February 20, 1784, to a builder. After completing his apprenticeship in the bookselling trade in Edinburgh and London, he started his own business in Edinburgh in 1808. By 1826, he was recognized as one of the leading booksellers in the city, and a few years later, his nephew Charles joined him in the business. The two major events in the firm’s history were the publication of the 7th, 8th, and 9th editions of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, and the acquisition of the stock and copyright of the Waverley Novels. In 1827, the copyright of the Encyclopaedia was transferred to Adam Black and a few of his friends. In 1851, the firm purchased the copyright of the Waverley Novels for £27,000, and in 1861, they acquired the rights to De Quincey’s works. Adam Black served as lord provost of Edinburgh twice and represented the city in parliament from 1856 to 1865. He retired from business in 1865 and passed away on January 24, 1874. His sons took over the business, relocating it to London in 1895. There is a bronze statue of Adam Black in East Princes Street Gardens, Edinburgh.
See Memoirs of Adam Black, edited by Alexander Nicholson (2nd ed., Edinburgh, 1885).
See Memoirs of Adam Black, edited by Alexander Nicholson (2nd ed., Edinburgh, 1885).
BLACK, JEREMIAH SULLIVAN (1810-1883), American lawyer and statesman, was born in Stony Creek township, Somerset county, Pennsylvania, on the 10th of January 1810. He was largely self-educated, and before he was of age was admitted to the Pennsylvania bar. He gradually became one of the leading American lawyers, and in 1851-1857 was a member of the supreme court of Pennsylvania (chief-justice 1851-1854). In 1857 he entered President Buchanan’s cabinet as attorney-general of the United States. In this capacity he successfully contested the validity of the “California land claims”—claims to about 19,000 sq. m. of land, fraudulently alleged to have been granted to land-grabbers and others by the Mexican government prior to the close of the Mexican War. From the 17th of December 1860 to the 4th of March 1861 he was secretary of state. Perhaps the most influential of President Buchanan’s official advisers, he denied the constitutionality of secession, and urged that Fort Sumter be properly reinforced and defended. “For ... the vigorous assertion at last in word and in deed that the United States is a nation,” says James Ford Rhodes, “for pointing out the way in which the authority of the Federal government might be exercised without infringing on the rights of the states, the gratitude of the American people is due to Jeremiah S. Black.” He became reporter to the Supreme Court of the United States in 1861, but after publishing the reports for the years 1861 and 1862 he resigned, and devoted himself almost exclusively to his private practice, appearing in such important cases before the Supreme Court as the one known as Ex-Parte Milligan, in which he ably defended the right of trial by jury, the McCardle case and the United States v. Blyew et al. After the Civil War he vigorously opposed the Congressional plan of reconstructing the late Confederate states, and himself drafted the message of President Johnson, vetoing the Reconstruction Act of the 2nd of March 1867. Black was also for a short time counsel for President Andrew Johnson, in his trial on the article of impeachment, before the United States Senate, and for William W. Belknap (1829-1890), secretary of war from 1869 to 1876, who in 1876 was impeached on a charge of corruption; and with others he represented Samuel J. Tilden during the contest for the presidency between Tilden and Hayes (see Electoral Commission). He died at Brockie, Pennsylvania, on the 19th of August 1883.
BLACK, JEREMIAH SULLIVAN (1810-1883), American lawyer and politician, was born in Stony Creek township, Somerset County, Pennsylvania, on January 10, 1810. He was mostly self-taught, and before turning 18, he was admitted to the Pennsylvania bar. He eventually became one of the top American lawyers, and from 1851 to 1857, he served on the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (chief justice from 1851 to 1854). In 1857, he joined President Buchanan’s cabinet as the Attorney General of the United States. In this role, he successfully argued against the validity of the “California land claims”—claims to about 19,000 square miles of land that land-grabbers and others falsely asserted had been granted by the Mexican government before the end of the Mexican War. From December 17, 1860, to March 4, 1861, he was Secretary of State. Perhaps the most influential of President Buchanan’s advisors, he rejected the idea that secession was constitutional and advocated for properly reinforcing and defending Fort Sumter. “For ... the vigorous assertion at last in word and in deed that the United States is a nation,” writes James Ford Rhodes, “for pointing out how the authority of the Federal government could be exercised without infringing on the rights of the states, the American people owe their gratitude to Jeremiah S. Black.” He became the reporter for the Supreme Court of the United States in 1861, but after publishing the reports for 1861 and 1862, he resigned and focused almost exclusively on his private practice, participating in important cases like Ex-Parte Milligan, where he effectively defended the right to trial by jury, the McCardle case, and United States v. Blyew et al. After the Civil War, he strongly opposed Congress's plan to rebuild the former Confederate states and drafted President Johnson's message vetoing the Reconstruction Act of March 2, 1867. Black also briefly served as counsel for President Andrew Johnson during his impeachment trial in the United States Senate and for William W. Belknap (1829-1890), the Secretary of War from 1869 to 1876, who was impeached on corruption charges in 1876; he, along with others, represented Samuel J. Tilden during the presidential contest between Tilden and Hayes (see Electoral Commission). He died in Brockie, Pennsylvania, on August 19, 1883.
See Essays and Speeches of Jeremiah S. Black, with a Biographical Sketch (New York, 1885), by his son, C.F. Black.
See Essays and Speeches of Jeremiah S. Black, with a Biographical Sketch (New York, 1885), by his son, C.F. Black.
BLACK, JOSEPH (1728-1799), Scottish chemist and physicist, was born in 1728 at Bordeaux, where his father—a native of Belfast but of Scottish descent—was engaged in the wine trade. At the age of twelve he was sent to a grammar school in Belfast, whence he removed in 1746 to study medicine in Glasgow. There he had William Cullen for his instructor in chemistry, and the relation between the two soon became that of professor and assistant rather than of master and pupil. The action of lithontriptic medicines, especially lime-water, was one of the questions of the day, and through his investigations of this subject Black was led to the chemical discoveries associated with his name. The causticity of alkaline bodies was explained at that time as depending on the presence in them of the principle of fire, “phlogiston”; quicklime, for instance, was chalk which had taken up phlogiston, and when mild alkalis such as sodium or potassium carbonate were causticized by its aid, the phlogiston was supposed to pass from it to them. Black showed that on the contrary causticization meant the loss of something, as proved by loss of weight; and this something he found to be an “air,” which, because it was fixed in the substance before it was causticized, he spoke of as “fixed air.” Taking magnesia alba, which he distinguished from limestone with which it had previously been confused, he showed that on being heated it lost weight owing to the escape of this fixed air (named carbonic acid by Lavoisier in 1781), and that the weight was regained when the calcined product was made to reabsorb the fixed air with which it had parted. These investigations, by which Black not only gave a great impetus to the chemistry of gases by clearly indicating the existence of a gas distinct from common air, but also anticipated Lavoisier and modern chemistry by his appeal to the balance, were described in the thesis De humore acido a cibis orto, et magnesia alba, which he presented for his doctor’s degree in 1754; and a fuller account of them was read before the Medical Society of Edinburgh in June 1753, and published in the following year as Experiments upon magnesia, quicklime and some other alkaline substances.
BLACK, JOSEPH (1728-1799), Scottish chemist and physicist, was born in 1728 in Bordeaux, where his father—a Belfast native of Scottish descent—was in the wine business. At twelve, he went to a grammar school in Belfast, and in 1746, he moved to Glasgow to study medicine. There, he had William Cullen as his chemistry instructor, and their relationship quickly evolved from teacher and student to one of professor and assistant. One of the hot topics of the time was the effects of lithontriptic medicines, especially lime-water, and through his research on this topic, Black made the chemical discoveries that became known by his name. The causticity of alkaline substances was thought to be due to the presence of a principle called fire, or “phlogiston.” For example, quicklime was viewed as chalk that had absorbed phlogiston, and when mild alkalis like sodium or potassium carbonate were made caustic with its assistance, it was believed that phlogiston transferred from quicklime to them. Black demonstrated that causticization actually involved the loss of something, which he proved by the decrease in weight, and he found this to be an “air” that was fixed in the substance before it was causticized, which he referred to as “fixed air.” He took magnesia alba, which he differentiated from limestone, and showed that when heated, it lost weight due to the release of this fixed air (later named carbonic acid by Lavoisier in 1781), and that the weight could be regained once the calcined product reabsorbed the fixed air it had lost. Through these studies, Black not only greatly advanced gas chemistry by clearly showing the existence of a gas separate from common air, but he also foreshadowed Lavoisier and modern chemistry by his focus on balance. His work was outlined in the thesis De humore acido a cibis orto, et magnesia alba, which he submitted for his doctorate in 1754, and a more detailed account was presented before the Medical Society of Edinburgh in June 1753, published the following year as Experiments upon magnesia, quicklime and some other alkaline substances.
It is curious that Black left to others the detailed study of this “fixed air” he had discovered. Probably the explanation is pressure of other work. In 1756 he succeeded Cullen as lecturer in chemistry at Glasgow, and was also appointed professor of anatomy, though that post he was glad to exchange for the chair of medicine. The preparation of lectures thus took up much of his time, and he was also gaining an extensive practice as a physician. Moreover, his attention was engaged on studies which ultimately led to his doctrine of latent heat. He noticed that when ice melts it takes up a quantity of heat without undergoing any change of temperature, and he argued that this heat, which as was usual in his time he looked upon as a subtle fluid, must have combined with the particles of ice and thus become latent in its substance. This hypothesis he verified quantitatively 19 by experiments, performed at the end of 1761. In 1764, with the aid of his assistant, William Irvine (1743-1787), he further measured the latent heat of steam, though not very accurately. This doctrine of latent heat he taught in his lectures from 1761 onwards, and in April 1762 he described his work to a literary society in Glasgow. But he never published any detailed account of it, so that others, such as J.A. Deluc, were able to claim the credit of his results. In the course of his inquiries he also noticed that different bodies in equal masses require different amounts of heat to raise them to the same temperature, and so founded the doctrine of specific heats; he also showed that equal additions or abstractions of heat produced equal variations of bulk in the liquid of his thermometers. In 1766 he succeeded Cullen in the chair of chemistry in Edinburgh, where he devoted practically all his time to the preparation of his lectures. Never very robust, his health gradually became weaker and ultimately he was reduced to the condition of a valetudinarian. In 1795 he received the aid of a coadjutor in his professorship, and two years later he lectured for the last time. He died in Edinburgh on the 6th of December 1799 (not on the 26th of November as stated in Robison’s life).
It's interesting that Black left the in-depth study of the “fixed air” he discovered to others. The likely reason is that he was busy with other work. In 1756, he took over Cullen's position as a chemistry lecturer at Glasgow and was also appointed as a professor of anatomy, although he was happy to trade that role for the chair of medicine. Preparing lectures took up a lot of his time, and he was also building a large practice as a physician. Additionally, he was focused on studies that eventually led to his theory of latent heat. He observed that when ice melts, it absorbs a certain amount of heat without changing temperature and argued that this heat, which he viewed as a subtle fluid common in his time, must have bonded with the ice particles and thus become latent in its substance. He quantitatively verified this hypothesis through experiments he conducted at the end of 1761. In 1764, with the help of his assistant, William Irvine (1743-1787), he further measured the latent heat of steam, though not very accurately. He taught this theory of latent heat in his lectures from 1761 onward, and in April 1762 he presented his work to a literary society in Glasgow. However, he never published a detailed account of it, allowing others, like J.A. Deluc, to claim credit for his findings. During his research, he also realized that different materials of equal mass require different amounts of heat to reach the same temperature, which led to the development of the concept of specific heats; he also demonstrated that equal additions or removals of heat produced equal changes in the volume of the liquid in his thermometers. In 1766, he replaced Cullen as the chair of chemistry in Edinburgh, where he devoted almost all his time to preparing his lectures. Not very robust, his health gradually weakened, and he eventually became quite frail. In 1795, he received help from a coadjutor in his professorship, and two years later, he lectured for the last time. He died in Edinburgh on December 6, 1799 (not on November 26, as stated in Robison’s biography).
As a scientific investigator, Black was conspicuous for the carefulness of his work and his caution in drawing conclusions. Holding that chemistry had not attained the rank of a science—his lectures dealt with the “effects of heat and mixture”—he had an almost morbid horror of hasty generalization or of anything that had the pretensions of a fully fledged system. This mental attitude, combined with a certain lack of initiative and the weakness of his health, probably prevented him from doing full justice to his splendid powers of experimental research. Apart from the work already mentioned he published only two papers during his life-time—“The supposed effect of boiling on water, in disposing it to freeze more readily” (Phil. Trans., 1775), and “An analysis of the waters of the hot springs in Iceland” (Trans. Roy. Soc. Ed., 1794).
As a scientific researcher, Black was known for his meticulous work and his careful approach to drawing conclusions. He believed that chemistry hadn't yet reached the status of a true science—his lectures focused on the “effects of heat and mixture”—and he had an almost obsessive dislike for quick generalizations or anything that claimed to be a complete theory. This mindset, along with a certain lack of initiative and his frail health, likely held him back from fully utilizing his remarkable abilities in experimental research. Aside from the work already mentioned, he published only two papers during his lifetime—“The supposed effect of boiling on water, in disposing it to freeze more readily” (Phil. Trans., 1775), and “An analysis of the waters of the hot springs in Iceland” (Trans. Roy. Soc. Ed., 1794).
After his death his lectures were written out from his own notes, supplemented by those of some of his pupils, and published with a biographical preface by his friend and colleague, Professor John Robison (1739-1805), in 1803 as Lectures on the Elements of Chemistry, delivered in the University of Edinburgh.
After his death, his lectures were transcribed from his own notes, along with contributions from some of his students, and published with a biographical introduction by his friend and colleague, Professor John Robison (1739-1805), in 1803 as Lectures on the Elements of Chemistry, delivered in the University of Edinburgh.
BLACK, WILLIAM (1841-1898), British novelist, was born at Glasgow on the 9th of November 1841. His early ambition was to be a painter, but he made no way, and soon had recourse to journalism for a living. He was at first employed in newspaper offices in Glasgow, but obtained a post on the Morning Star in London, and at once proved himself a descriptive writer of exceptional vivacity. During the war between Prussia and Austria in 1866 he represented the Morning Star at the front, and was taken prisoner. This paper shortly afterwards failed, and Black joined the editorial staff of the Daily News. He also edited the Examiner, at a time when that periodical was already moribund. After his first success in fiction, he gave up journalism, and devoted himself entirely to the production of novels. For nearly thirty years he was successful in retaining the popular favour. He died at Brighton on the 10th of December 1898, without having experienced any of that reaction of the public taste which so often follows upon conspicuous successes in fiction. Black’s first novel, James Merle, published in 1864, was a complete failure; his second, Love or Marraige (1868), attracted but very slight attention. In Silk Attire (1869) and Kilmeny (1870) marked a great advance on his first work, but in 1871 A Daughter of Heth suddenly raised him to the height of popularity, and he followed up this success by a string of favourites. Among the best of his books are The Strange Adventures of a Phaeton (1872); A Princess of Thule (1874); Madcap Violet (1876); Macleod of Dare (1878); White Wings (1880); Sunrise (1880); Shandon Bells (1883); Judith Shakespeare (1884); White Heather (1885); Donald Ross of Heimra (1891); Highland Cousins (1894); and Wild Eelin (1898). Black was a thoroughgoing sportsman, particularly fond of fishing and yachting, and his best stories are those which are laid amid the breezy mountains of his native land, or upon the deck of a yacht at sea off its wild coast. His descriptions of such scenery are simple and picturesque. He was a word-painter rather than a student of human nature. His women are stronger than his men, and among them are many wayward and lovable creatures; but subtlety of intuition plays no part in his characterization. Black also contributed a life of Oliver Goldsmith to the English Men of Letters series.
BLACK, WILLIAM (1841-1898), British novelist, was born in Glasgow on November 9, 1841. His early dream was to be a painter, but he didn’t make much progress and soon turned to journalism to earn a living. He initially worked in newspaper offices in Glasgow but then got a job with the Morning Star in London, where he quickly proved himself to be an exceptionally lively descriptive writer. During the war between Prussia and Austria in 1866, he covered the front lines for the Morning Star and was captured. Shortly after, that newspaper went out of business, and Black joined the editorial team at the Daily News. He also edited the Examiner, which was already declining at that time. After achieving his first success in fiction, he left journalism and committed himself entirely to writing novels. For nearly thirty years, he successfully maintained public appeal. He died in Brighton on December 10, 1898, without experiencing the public backlash that often comes after notable success in fiction. Black’s first novel, James Merle, published in 1864, was a total flop; his second, Love or Marriage (1868), received very little attention. In Silk Attire (1869) and Kilmeny (1870) showed significant improvement over his earlier work, but in 1871, A Daughter of Heth catapulted him to fame, leading to a series of popular hits. Some of his best works include The Strange Adventures of a Phaeton (1872); A Princess of Thule (1874); Madcap Violet (1876); Macleod of Dare (1878); White Wings (1880); Sunrise (1880); Shandon Bells (1883); Judith Shakespeare (1884); White Heather (1885); Donald Ross of Heimra (1891); Highland Cousins (1894); and Wild Eelin (1898). Black was a dedicated sportsman, especially fond of fishing and yachting, and his best stories are set against the breezy mountains of his homeland or on the deck of a yacht at sea along its rugged coastline. His descriptions of such landscapes are straightforward and vivid. He was more of a word-painter than a deep observer of human nature. His female characters are stronger than his male ones, featuring many whimsical and lovable figures; however, subtle insight doesn’t play a role in his character development. Black also wrote a biography of Oliver Goldsmith for the English Men of Letters series.
BLACK APE, a sooty, black, short-tailed, and long-faced representative of the macaques, inhabiting the island of Celebes, and generally regarded as forming a genus by itself, under the name of Cynopithecus niger, but sometimes relegated to the rank of a subgenus of Macacus. The nostrils open obliquely at some distance from the end of the snout, and the head carries a crest of long hair. There are several local races, one of which was long regarded as a separate species under the name of the Moor macaque, Macacus maurus. (See Primates.)
BLACK APE, a dark black, short-tailed, long-faced type of macaque, lives on the island of Celebes. It's usually seen as its own genus, called Cynopithecus niger, though sometimes it's classified as a subgenus of Macacus. The nostrils are positioned at an angle a bit away from the end of the snout, and the head has a crest of long hair. There are several local varieties, one of which was once considered a separate species known as the Moor macaque, Macacus maurus. (See Primates.)
BLACKBALL, a token used for voting by ballot against the election of a candidate for membership of a club or other association. Formerly white and black balls about the size of pigeons’ eggs were used respectively to represent votes for and against a candidate for such election; and although this method is now generally obsolete, the term “blackball” survives both as noun and verb. The rules of most clubs provide that a stated proportion of “blackballs” shall exclude candidates proposed for election, and the candidates so excluded are said to have been “blackballed”; but the ballot (q.v.) is now usually conducted by a method in which the favourable and adverse votes are not distinguished by different coloured balls at all. Either voting papers are employed, or balls—of which the colour has no significance—are cast into different compartments of a ballot-box according as they are favourable or adverse to the candidate.
BLACKBALL, a term used for voting against the election of a candidate for membership in a club or other organization. In the past, white and black balls about the size of pigeon eggs were used to represent votes for and against a candidate in such elections; although this method is now largely outdated, the term “blackball” still exists as both a noun and a verb. Most clubs have rules stating that a certain number of “blackballs” will exclude proposed candidates from election, and the candidates who are excluded are said to have been “blackballed”; however, the voting process (q.v.) is now typically conducted in a way that doesn’t use different colored balls to distinguish the votes. Instead, either voting papers are used, or balls—whose color is not significant—are placed into different compartments of a ballot box based on whether they support or oppose the candidate.
BLACKBERRY, or Bramble, known botanically as Rubus fruticosus (natural order Rosaceac), a native of the north temperate region of the Old World, and abundant in the British Isles as a copse and hedge-plant. It is characterized by its prickly stem, leaves with usually three or five ovate, coarsely toothed stalked leaflets, many of which persist through the winter, white or pink flowers in terminal clusters, and black or red-purple fruits, each consisting of numerous succulent drupels crowded on a dry conical receptacle. It is a most variable plant, exhibiting many more or less distinct forms which are regarded by different authorities as sub-species or species. In America several forms of the native blackberry, Rubus nigrobaccus (formerly known as R. villosus), are widely cultivated; it is described as one of the most important and profitable of bush-fruits.
BLACKBERRY, or Bramble, botanically known as Rubus fruticosus (part of the Rosaceae family), is native to the temperate regions of the Old World and is common in the British Isles as a bush and hedge plant. It features a prickly stem, leaves that typically have three or five oval, coarsely toothed stalked leaflets, many of which stay green through winter, and clusters of white or pink flowers. Its fruits are black or red-purple, made up of many juicy drupes packed on a dry conical base. This plant is highly variable, showing many more or less distinct forms that are classified by different experts as subspecies or species. In America, several forms of the native blackberry, Rubus nigrobaccus (previously known as R. villosus), are widely grown; it is considered one of the most significant and profitable bush fruits.
For details see F.W. Card in L.H. Bailey’s Cyclopedia of American Horticulture (1900).
For details, see F.W. Card in L.H. Bailey’s Cyclopedia of American Horticulture (1900).
BLACKBIRD (Turdus merula), the name commonly given to a well-known British bird of the Turdidae family, for which the ancient name was ousel (q.v.), Anglo-Saxon ósle, equivalent of the German Amsel, a form of the word found in several old English books. The plumage of the male is of a uniform black colour, that of the female various shades of brown, while the bill of the male, especially during the breeding season, is of a bright gamboge yellow. The blackbird is of a shy and restless disposition, courting concealment, and rarely seen in flocks, or otherwise than singly or in pairs, and taking flight when startled with a sharp shrill cry. It builds its nest in March, or early in April, in thick bushes or in ivy-clad trees, and usually rears at least two broods each season. The nest is a neat structure of coarse grass and moss, mixed with earth, and plastered internally with mud, and here the female lays from four to six eggs of a blue colour speckled with brown. The blackbird feeds chiefly on fruits, worms, the larvae of insects and snails, extracting the last from their shells by dexterously chipping them on stones; and though it is generally regarded as an enemy of the garden, it is probable that the amount of damage by it to the fruit is largely compensated for by its undoubted services as a vermin-killer. The notes of the blackbird are rich and full, but monotonous as compared with those of the song-thrush. Like many other singing birds it is, in the wild state, a 20 mocking-bird, having been heard to imitate the song of the nightingale, the crowing of a cock, and even the cackling of a hen. In confinement it can be taught to whistle a variety of tunes, and even to imitate the human voice.
BLACKBIRD (Turdus merula), the name given to a well-known British bird from the Turdidae family, which was originally called ousel (q.v.), the Anglo-Saxon term ósle, similar to the German Amsel, and appears in various old English texts. The male has solid black plumage, while the female has different shades of brown. The male's bill, especially during the breeding season, is a bright gamboge yellow. The blackbird tends to be shy and restless, preferring to hide and rarely seen in flocks, usually appearing alone or in pairs, taking off with a sharp, shrill cry when startled. It builds its nest in March or early April, typically in dense bushes or trees covered in ivy, and usually raises at least two broods each season. The nest is a neat construction made of coarse grass, moss, and dirt, lined with mud on the inside, where the female lays four to six blue eggs speckled with brown. The blackbird mainly eats fruits, worms, insect larvae, and snails, skillfully cracking the snails open on stones; although often seen as a garden pest, the damage it causes to fruit is likely outweighed by its role in controlling pests. The blackbird’s calls are rich and full but repetitive compared to the song-thrush. Like many other singing birds, it can mimic a variety of sounds in the wild, including the nightingale's song, a crowing rooster, and even a hen's cluck. In captivity, it can learn to whistle different tunes and even imitate human voices.
The blackbird is found in every country of Europe, even breeding—although rarely—beyond the arctic circle, and in eastern Asia as well as in North Africa and the Atlantic islands. In most parts of its range it is migratory, and in Britain every autumn its numbers receive considerable accession from passing visitors. Allied species inhabit most parts of the world, excepting Africa south of the Sahara, New Zealand and Australia proper, and North America. In some of these the legs as well as the bill are yellow or orange; and in a few both sexes are glossy black. The ring-ousel, Turdus torquatus, has a dark bill and conspicuous white gorget, whence its name. It is rarer and more local than the common blackbird, and occurs in England only as a temporary spring and autumn visitor.
The blackbird can be found in every country in Europe, and it even breeds—although rarely—beyond the Arctic Circle, as well as in eastern Asia, North Africa, and the Atlantic islands. In most areas it migrates, and in Britain, every autumn, its population significantly increases due to migrating visitors. Related species are found in many parts of the world, except for regions in Africa south of the Sahara, New Zealand, Australia, and North America. In some of these species, the legs and bill are yellow or orange; and in a few, both males and females are glossy black. The ring-ousel, Turdus torquatus, has a dark bill and a noticeable white throat patch, which is how it got its name. It is less common and more localized than the common blackbird, and it occurs in England only as a temporary visitor in spring and autumn.
BLACK BUCK (Antilope cervicapra), the Indian Antelope, the sole species of its genus. This antelope, widely distributed in India, with the exception of Ceylon and the region east of the Bay of Bengal, stands about 32 in. high at the shoulder; the general hue is brown deepening with age to black; chest, belly and inner sides of limbs pure white, as are the muzzle and chin, and an area round the eyes. The horns are long, ringed, and form spirals with from three to five turns. The doe is smaller in size, yellowish-fawn above, and this hue obtains also in young males. These antelopes frequent grassy districts and are usually found in herds. Coursing black-buck with the cheeta (q.v.) is a favourite Indian sport.
BLACK BUCK (Antilope cervicapra), the Indian Antelope, is the only species in its genus. This antelope is commonly found throughout India, except in Sri Lanka and the area east of the Bay of Bengal. It typically stands about 32 inches tall at the shoulder; its coloration is brown, which darkens to black with age. Its chest, belly, and the inner sides of its limbs are pure white, as are its muzzle, chin, and the area around its eyes. The horns are long, ringed, and spiral, with three to five turns. The females are smaller and have a yellowish-fawn color on top, which is also seen in young males. These antelopes prefer grassy areas and are mostly found in herds. Coursing black-buck with the cheetah (q.v.) is a popular sport in India.
BLACKBURN, COLIN BLACKBURN, Baron (1813-1896), British judge, was born in Selkirkshire in 1813, and educated at Eton and at Trinity College, Cambridge, taking high mathematical honours in 1835. He was called to the bar in 1838, and went the northern circuit. His progress was at first slow, and he employed himself in reporting and editing, with T.F. Ellis, eight volumes of the highly-esteemed Ellis and Blackburn reports. His deficiency in all the more brilliant qualities of the advocate almost confined his practice to commercial cases, in which he obtained considerable employment in his circuit; but he continued to belong to the outside bar, and was so little known to the legal world that his promotion to a puisne judgeship in the court of queen’s bench in 1859 was at first ascribed to Lord Campbell’s partiality for his countrymen, but Lord Lyndhurst, Lord Wensleydale and Lord Cranworth came forward to defend the appointment. Blackburn himself is said to have thought that a county court judgeship was about to be offered him, which he had resolved to decline. He soon proved himself one of the soundest lawyers on the bench, and when he was promoted to the court of appeal in 1876 was considered the highest authority on common law. In 1876 he was made a lord of appeal and a life peer. Both in this capacity and as judge of the queen’s bench he delivered many judgments of the highest importance, and no decisions have been received with greater respect. In 1886 he was appointed a member of the commission charged to prepare a digest of the criminal law, but retired on account of indisposition in the following year. He died at his country residence, Doonholm in Ayrshire, on the 8th of January 1896. He was the author of a valuable work on the Law of Sales.
BLACKBURN, COLIN BLACKBURN, Baron (1813-1896), British judge, was born in Selkirkshire in 1813 and educated at Eton and Trinity College, Cambridge, where he graduated with high honors in mathematics in 1835. He was called to the bar in 1838 and practiced on the northern circuit. His early career was slow, and he spent time reporting and editing eight volumes of the well-regarded Ellis and Blackburn reports alongside T.F. Ellis. His lack of the more charismatic qualities of an advocate limited his practice largely to commercial cases, where he found significant work in his circuit. However, he remained part of the outer bar and was so little known in legal circles that his promotion to a puisne judgeship in the Queen’s Bench in 1859 was initially attributed to Lord Campbell's bias towards his fellow countrymen. Yet, Lord Lyndhurst, Lord Wensleydale, and Lord Cranworth stepped forward to support his appointment. Blackburn himself believed that a county court judgeship was about to be offered to him, which he intended to turn down. He quickly established himself as one of the most competent lawyers on the bench, and when he was promoted to the Court of Appeal in 1876, he was recognized as a leading authority on common law. In 1876, he was made a lord of appeal and a life peer. In both roles and as a judge in the Queen’s Bench, he delivered many significant judgments, all of which were respected greatly. In 1886, he was appointed to a commission tasked with preparing a digest of criminal law but had to step down due to health issues the following year. He passed away at his country home, Doonholm in Ayrshire, on January 8, 1896. He was also the author of an important work on the Law of Sales.
See The Times, 10th of January 1896; E. Manson, Builders of our Law (1904).
See The Times, January 10, 1896; E. Manson, Builders of Our Law (1904).
BLACKBURN, JONATHAN (c. 1700-c. 1765), American portrait painter, was born in Connecticut. He seems to have been the son of a painter, and to have had a studio in Boston in 1750-1765; among his patrons were many important early American families, including the Apthorps, Amorys, Bulfinches, Lowells, Ewings, Saltonstalls, Winthrops, Winslows and Otises of Boston. Some of his portraits are in the possession of the public library of Lexington, Massachusetts, and of the Massachusetts Historical Society, but most of them are privately owned and are scattered over the country, the majority being in Boston. John Singleton Copley was his pupil, and it is said that he finally left his studio in Boston, through jealousy of Copley’s superior success. He was a good portrait painter, and some of his pictures were long attributed to Copley.
BLACKBURN, JONATHAN (c. 1700-c. 1765), an American portrait painter, was born in Connecticut. He appears to have been the son of a painter and had a studio in Boston from 1750 to 1765. Among his patrons were several prominent early American families, including the Apthorps, Amorys, Bulfinches, Lowells, Ewings, Saltonstalls, Winthrops, Winslows, and Otises of Boston. Some of his portraits are held by the public library in Lexington, Massachusetts, and the Massachusetts Historical Society, but most of them are privately owned and are spread across the country, with the majority in Boston. John Singleton Copley was his student, and it's said that he eventually left his studio in Boston due to jealousy over Copley’s greater success. He was a skilled portrait painter, and some of his works were long thought to be by Copley.
BLACKBURN, a municipal, county and parliamentary borough of Lancashire, England, 210 m. N.W. by N. from London, and 24½ N.N.W. from Manchester, served by the Lancashire & Yorkshire and the London & North Western railways, with several lines from all parts of the county. Pop. (1891) 120,064; (1901) 127,626. It lies in the valley of a stream called in early times the Blackeburn, but now known as the Brook. The hills in the vicinity rise to some 900 ft., and among English manufacturing towns Blackburn ranks high in beauty of situation. Besides numerous churches and chapels the public buildings comprise a large town hall (1856), market house, exchange, county court, municipal offices, chamber of commerce, free library, and, outside the town, an infirmary. There are an Elizabethan grammar school, in modern buildings (1884) and an excellent technical school. The Corporation Park and Queen’s Park are well laid out, and contain ornamental waters. There is an efficient tramway service, connecting the town with Darwen, 5 m. south. The cotton industry employs thousands of operatives, the iron trade is also very considerable, and many are engaged in the making of machines; but a former woollen manufacture is almost extinct. Blackburn’s speciality in the cotton industry is weaving. Coal, lime and building stone are abundant in the neighbourhood. Blackburn received a charter of incorporation in 1851, and is governed by a mayor, 14 aldermen and 42 councillors. The county borough was created in 1888. The parliamentary borough, which returns two members, is coextensive with the municipal, and lies between the Accrington and Darwen divisions of the county. Area, 7432 acres.
BLACKBURN, is a municipal, county, and parliamentary borough in Lancashire, England, located 210 miles northwest of London and 24.5 miles north-northwest of Manchester. It is served by the Lancashire & Yorkshire and the London & North Western railways, with several lines connecting to all parts of the county. Population: (1891) 120,064; (1901) 127,626. The town is situated in the valley of a stream that was once called the Blackeburn, now known as the Brook. The nearby hills reach about 900 feet, and Blackburn is recognized for its beautiful location among English manufacturing towns. In addition to numerous churches and chapels, public buildings include a large town hall (1856), market house, exchange, county court, municipal offices, chamber of commerce, free library, and an infirmary located outside the town. There is an Elizabethan grammar school housed in modern buildings (1884) and an excellent technical school. Corporation Park and Queen’s Park are well-designed and feature ornamental waters. The town has a reliable tramway service that connects it to Darwen, 5 miles to the south. The cotton industry employs thousands of workers, the iron trade is also significant, and many people are involved in machinery manufacturing; however, the woolen industry has nearly vanished. Blackburn specializes in cotton weaving. Coal, lime, and building stone are plentiful in the area. Blackburn received a charter of incorporation in 1851 and is governed by a mayor, 14 aldermen, and 42 councillors. The county borough was established in 1888. The parliamentary borough, which elects two members, coincides with the municipal boundaries, lying between the Accrington and Darwen divisions of the county. Area: 7,432 acres.
Blackburn is of considerable antiquity; indeed, the 6th century is allocated to the original foundation of a church on the site of the present parish church. Of another church on this site Cranmer was rector after the Reformation. Blackburn was for some time the chief town of a district called Blackburnshire, and as early as the reign of Elizabeth ranked as a flourishing market town. About the middle of the 17th century it became famous for its “checks,” which were afterwards superseded by a similar linen-and-cotton fabric known as “Blackburn greys.” In the 18th century the ability of certain natives of the town greatly fostered its cotton industry; thus James Hargreaves here probably invented his spinning jenny about 1764, though the operatives, fearing a reduction of labour, would have none of it, and forced him to quit the town for Nottingham. He was in the employment of Robert Peel, grandfather of the prime minister of that name, who here instituted the factory system, and as the director of a large business carefully fostered the improvement of methods.
Blackburn has a long history; in fact, a church was originally founded on the site of the current parish church around the 6th century. Cranmer served as the rector of another church on this site after the Reformation. For a period, Blackburn was the main town in a region called Blackburnshire, and even during Queen Elizabeth’s reign, it was recognized as a thriving market town. By the mid-17th century, it gained fame for its “checks,” which were later replaced by a similar linen-and-cotton fabric known as “Blackburn greys.” In the 18th century, the skills of some local residents greatly boosted the cotton industry; for instance, James Hargreaves is thought to have invented his spinning jenny here around 1764, although the workers, fearing job losses, rejected it and pressured him to leave for Nottingham. He worked for Robert Peel, the grandfather of the famous prime minister, who established the factory system here and, as the head of a large business, carefully promoted improvements in production methods.
See W.A. Abram, History of Blackburn (Blackburn, 1897).
See W.A. Abram, History of Blackburn (Blackburn, 1897).
BLACKBURNE, FRANCIS (1782-1867), lord chancellor of Ireland, was born at Great Footstown, Co. Meath, Ireland, on the 11th of November 1782. Educated at Trinity College, Dublin, he was called to the English bar in 1805, and practised with great success on the home circuit. Called to the Irish bar in 1822, he vigorously administered the Insurrection Act in Limerick for two years, effectually restoring order in the district. In 1826 he became a serjeant-at-law, and in 1830, and again, in 1841, was attorney-general for Ireland. In 1842 he became master of the rolls in Ireland, in 1846 chief-justice of the queen’s bench, and in 1852 (and again in 1866) lord chancellor of Ireland. In 1856 he was made a lord justice of appeal in Ireland. He is remembered as having prosecuted O’Connell and presided at the trial of Smith O’Brien. He died on the 17th of September 1867.
BLACKBURNE, FRANCIS (1782-1867), Lord Chancellor of Ireland, was born in Great Footstown, Co. Meath, Ireland, on November 11, 1782. He studied at Trinity College, Dublin, and was called to the English bar in 1805, where he practiced successfully on the home circuit. He was called to the Irish bar in 1822 and actively enforced the Insurrection Act in Limerick for two years, successfully restoring order in the area. In 1826, he became a serjeant-at-law, and served as Attorney-General for Ireland in 1830 and again in 1841. In 1842, he became Master of the Rolls in Ireland, then Chief Justice of the Queen’s Bench in 1846, and served as Lord Chancellor of Ireland in 1852 and again in 1866. In 1856, he was appointed a Lord Justice of Appeal in Ireland. He is remembered for prosecuting O’Connell and presiding over the trial of Smith O’Brien. He died on September 17, 1867.
BLACKCOCK (Tetrao tetrix), the English name given to a bird of the family Tetraonidae or grouse, the female of which is known as the grey hen and the young as poults. In size and plumage the two sexes offer a striking contrast, the male weighing about 4 ℔, its plumage for the most part of a rich glossy black shot with blue and purple, the lateral tail feathers curved outwards so as to form, when raised, a fan-like crescent, and the eyebrows destitute of feathers and of a bright vermilion red. The female, 21 on the other hand, weighs only 2 ℔, its plumage is of a russet brown colour irregularly barred with black, and its tail feathers are but slightly forked. The males are polygamous, and during autumn and winter associate together, feeding in flocks apart from the females; but with the approach of spring they separate, each selecting a locality for itself, from which it drives off all intruders, and where morning and evening it seeks to attract the other sex by a display of its beautiful plumage, which at this season attains its greatest perfection, and by a peculiar cry, which Selby describes as “a crowing note, and another similar to the noise made by the whetting of a scythe.” The nest, composed of a few stalks of grass, is built on the ground, usually beneath the shadow of a low bush or a tuft of tall grass, and here the female lays from six to ten eggs of a dirty-yellow colour speckled with dark brown. The blackcock then rejoins his male associates, and the female is left to perform the labours of hatching and rearing her young brood. The plumage of both sexes is at first like that of the female, but after moulting the young males gradually assume the more brilliant plumage of their sex. There are also many cases on record, and specimens may be seen in the principal museums, of old female birds assuming, to a greater or less extent, the plumage of the male. The blackcock is very generally distributed over the highland districts of northern and central Europe, and in some parts of Asia. It is found on the principal heaths in the south of England, but is specially abundant in the Highlands of Scotland.
BLACKCOCK (Tetrao tetrix) is the English name for a bird in the family Tetraonidae, or grouse. The female is known as the grey hen, and the young are called poults. The two sexes are quite different in size and appearance; the male weighs about 4 lbs and has mostly rich glossy black feathers with blue and purple tones, and its tail feathers curve outward to create a fan-like shape when raised, with bright red, featherless eyebrows. On the other hand, the female weighs only 2 lbs, has russet-brown plumage with irregular black bars, and slightly forked tail feathers. Males are polygamous and often flock together in autumn and winter, separate from the females. However, as spring approaches, they break away, each choosing its own territory, which they defend against intruders. In the mornings and evenings, they display their beautiful plumage at its peak perfection and call out with a unique sound that Selby describes as “a crowing note, and another similar to the noise made by the whetting of a scythe.” The nest, made of a few grass stalks, is built on the ground, often under a low bush or a clump of tall grass, where the female lays six to ten dirty-yellow eggs speckled with dark brown. The male then rejoins his fellow males, leaving the female to incubate and raise the young. Initially, both sexes have plumage similar to the female's, but after molting, young males gradually develop the brighter feathers typical of their sex. There have also been many recorded instances, with specimens in major museums, of older females showing male plumage traits. The blackcock is widely found in the highlands of northern and central Europe and parts of Asia. It inhabits the major heaths in southern England but is especially abundant in the Highlands of Scotland.
![]() |
Blackcock. |
BLACK COUNTRY, THE, a name commonly applied to a district lying principally in S. Staffordshire, but extending into Worcestershire and Warwickshire, England. This is one of the chief manufacturing centres in the United Kingdom, and the name arises from the effect of numerous collieries and furnaces, which darken the face of the district, the buildings and the atmosphere. Coal, ironstone and clay are mined in close proximity, and every sort of iron and steel goods is produced. The district extends 15 m. N.W. from Birmingham, and includes Smethwick, West Bromwich, Dudley, Oldbury, Sedgley, Tipton, Bilston, Wednesbury, Wolverhampton and Walsall as its most important centres. The ceaseless activity of the Black Country is most readily realized when it is traversed, or viewed from such an elevation as Dudley Castle Hill, at night, when the glare of furnaces appears in every direction. The district is served by numerous branches of the Great Western, London & North Western, and Midland railways, and is intersected by canals, which carry a heavy traffic, and in some places are made to surmount physical obstacles with remarkable engineering skill, as in the case of the Castle Hill tunnels at Dudley. Among the numerous branches of industry there are several characteristic of certain individual centres. Thus, locks are a specialty at Wolverhampton and Willenhall, and keys at Wednesfield; horses’ bits, harness-fittings and saddlery at Walsall and Bloxwich, anchors and cables at Tipton, glass at Smethwick, and nails and chains at Cradley.
BLACK COUNTRY, THE, is a name commonly used for a region mainly located in South Staffordshire, but also extending into Worcestershire and Warwickshire, England. This area is one of the main manufacturing hubs in the United Kingdom, and its name comes from the impact of numerous coal mines and furnaces that darken the landscape, the buildings, and the air. Coal, ironstone, and clay are extracted here in close proximity, and all types of iron and steel products are manufactured. The district stretches about 15 miles northwest from Birmingham and includes the key areas of Smethwick, West Bromwich, Dudley, Oldbury, Sedgley, Tipton, Bilston, Wednesbury, Wolverhampton, and Walsall. The constant activity of the Black Country is most apparent when you travel through it or view it from a height like Dudley Castle Hill at night, when the glow of furnaces can be seen in every direction. The area is connected by various branches of the Great Western, London & North Western, and Midland railways, and is crisscrossed by canals that handle heavy traffic, with some sections showcasing impressive engineering feats, such as the Castle Hill tunnels in Dudley. Among the many industries, several are specific to certain towns. For example, locks are a specialty in Wolverhampton and Willenhall, keys in Wednesfield, horse bits, harness fittings, and saddlery in Walsall and Bloxwich, anchors and cables in Tipton, glass in Smethwick, and nails and chains in Cradley.
BLACK DROP, in astronomy, an apparent distortion of the planet Mercury or Venus at the time of internal contact with the limb of the sun at the beginning or end of a transit. It has been in the past a source of much perplexity to observers of transits, but is now understood to be a result of irradiation, produced by the atmosphere or by the aberration of the telescope.
BLACK DROP, in astronomy, is when the planet Mercury or Venus seems to be distorted at the moment it touches the edge of the sun at the start or end of a transit. This phenomenon used to confuse observers of transits, but it is now recognized as a result of irradiation caused by the atmosphere or by the telescope's aberration.
BLACKFOOT (Siksika), a tribe and confederacy of North American Indians of Algonquian stock. The name is explained as an allusion to their leggings being observed by the whites to have become blackened by marching over the freshly burned prairie. Their range was around the headwaters of the Missouri, from the Yellowstone northward to the North Saskatchewan and westward to the Rockies. The confederacy consisted of three tribes, the Blackfoot or Siksika proper, the Kaina and the Piegan. During the early years of the 19th century the Blackfoots were one of the strongest Indian confederacies of the north-west, numbering some 40,000. At the beginning of the 20th century there were about 5000, some in Montana and some in Canada.
BLACKFOOT (Siksika), a tribe and confederation of North American Indians of Algonquian descent. The name refers to their leggings, which white observers noted had become blackened from walking on the recently burned prairie. Their territory included the headwaters of the Missouri River, extending from the Yellowstone River north to the North Saskatchewan and west to the Rockies. The confederation was made up of three tribes: the Blackfoot or Siksika proper, the Kaina, and the Piegan. In the early 19th century, the Blackfoots were one of the strongest Native American confederacies in the northwest, with a population of about 40,000. By the early 20th century, their numbers had decreased to around 5,000, with some residing in Montana and others in Canada.
See Jean L’Heureux, Customs and Religious Ideas of Blackfoot Indians in J.A.I., vol. xv. (1886); G.B. Grinnell, Blackfoot Lodge Tales (1892); G. Catlin, North American Indians (1876); Handbook of American Indians (Washington, 1907), under “Siksika.”
See Jean L’Heureux, Customs and Religious Ideas of Blackfoot Indians in J.A.I., vol. xv. (1886); G.B. Grinnell, Blackfoot Lodge Tales (1892); G. Catlin, North American Indians (1876); Handbook of American Indians (Washington, 1907), under “Siksika.”
BLACK FOREST (Ger. Schwarzwald; the Silva Marciana and Abnoba of the Romans), a mountainous district of south-west Germany, having an area of 1844 sq. m., of which about two-thirds lie in the grand duchy of Baden and the remaining third in the kingdom of Württemberg. Bounded on the south and west by the valley of the Rhine, to which its declivities abruptly descend, and running parallel to, and forming the counterpart of the Vosges beyond, it slopes more gently down to the valley of the Neckar in the north and to that of the Nagold (a tributary of the Neckar) on the north-east. Its total length is 100 m., and its breadth varies from 36 m. in the south to 21 in the centre and 13 in the north. The deep valley of the Kinzig divides it laterally into halves, of which the southern, with an average elevation of 3000 ft., is the wilder and contains the loftiest peaks, which again mostly lie towards the western side. Among them are the Feldberg (4898 ft.), the Herzogenhorn (4600), the Blössling (4260) and the Blauen (3820). The northern half has an average height of 2000 ft. On the east side are several lakes, and here the majority of the streams take their rise. The configuration of the hills is mainly conical and the geological formation consists of gneiss, granite (in the south) and red sandstone. The district is poor in minerals; the yield of silver and copper has almost ceased, but there are workable coal seams near Offenburg, where the Kinzig debouches on the plain. The climate in the higher districts is raw and the produce is mostly confined to hardy cereals, such as oats. But the valleys, especially those on the western side, are warm and healthy, enclose good pasture land and furnish fruits and wine in rich profusion. They are clothed up to a height of about 2000 ft. with luxuriant woods of oak and beech, and above these again and up to an elevation of 4000 ft., surrounding the hills with a dense dark belt, are the forests of fir which have given the name to the district. The summits of the highest peaks are bare, but even on them snow seldom lies throughout the summer.
BLACK FOREST (Ger. Schwarzwald; the Silva Marciana and Abnoba of the Romans), a mountainous region in southwestern Germany, spans an area of 1,844 sq. miles, with about two-thirds in the grand duchy of Baden and the remaining third in the kingdom of Württemberg. It’s bordered to the south and west by the Rhine valley, where its slopes drop steeply, and runs parallel to the Vosges across the way. To the north, it gradually descends toward the Neckar valley, and to the northeast toward the Nagold valley (a tributary of the Neckar). Its total length is 100 miles, with widths ranging from 36 miles in the south to 21 in the center and 13 in the north. The deep Kinzig valley divides it laterally into two halves; the southern part has an average elevation of 3,000 ft. and is wilder, housing the tallest peaks, primarily on the western side. These include Feldberg (4,898 ft.), Herzogenhorn (4,600 ft.), Blössling (4,260 ft.), and Blauen (3,820 ft.). The northern half has an average height of 2,000 ft. On the east side, there are several lakes, and most of the streams originate here. The hills are mostly conical, and the geological makeup consists of gneiss, granite (in the south), and red sandstone. The region lacks mineral resources; silver and copper production has nearly stopped, but there are usable coal seams near Offenburg, where the Kinzig flows into the plain. The climate in the higher areas is harsh, and agriculture is limited to hardy crops like oats. However, the valleys, especially on the western side, are warm and healthy, offering good pasture land and a bounty of fruits and wine. Up to about 2,000 ft., the area is covered with lush oak and beech forests, and above that, up to 4,000 ft., dense dark fir forests encircle the hills, giving the district its name. The peaks of the highest mountains are bare, but even there, snow rarely lingers throughout the summer.
The Black Forest produces excellent timber, which is partly sawn in the valleys and partly exported down the Rhine in logs. Among other industries are the manufactures of watches, clocks, toys and musical instruments. There are numerous mineral springs, and among the watering places Baden-Baden and Wildbad are famous. The towns of Freiburg, Rastatt, Offenburg and Lahr, which lie under the western declivities, are the chief centres for the productions of the interior.
The Black Forest produces high-quality timber, which is partially sawn in the valleys and partially exported down the Rhine as logs. Other industries include the production of watches, clocks, toys, and musical instruments. There are many mineral springs, with Baden-Baden and Wildbad being well-known spa towns. The towns of Freiburg, Rastatt, Offenburg, and Lahr, located on the western slopes, are the main centers for the region's products.
The Black Forest is a favourite tourist resort and is opened up by numerous railways. In addition to the main lines in the valleys of the Rhine and Neckar, which are connected with the towns lying on its fringe, the district is intersected by the 22 Schwarzwaldbahn from Offenburg to Singen, from which various small local lines ramify.
The Black Forest is a popular tourist destination and is accessible via several railways. Alongside the main lines in the valleys of the Rhine and Neckar, which connect to the towns at its edges, the area is crossed by the 22 Schwarzwaldbahn from Offenburg to Singen, from which various smaller local lines branch out.
BLACK HAWK [Ma‘katawimesheka‘ka, “Black Sparrow Hawk”], (1767-1838), American Indian warrior of the Sauk and Fox tribes, was born at the Sauk village on Rock river, near the Mississippi, in 1767. He was a member of the Thunder gens of the Sauk tribe, and, though neither an hereditary nor an elected chief, was for some time the recognized war leader of the Sauk and Foxes. From his youth he was intensely bloodthirsty and hostile to the Americans. Immediately after the acquisition of “Louisiana,” the Federal government took steps for the removal of the Sauk and Foxes, who had always been a disturbing element among the north-western Indians, to the west bank of the Mississippi river. As early as 1804, by a treaty signed at St Louis on the 3rd of November, they agreed to the removal in return for an annuity of $1000. British influences were still strong in the upper Mississippi valley and undoubtedly led Black Hawk and the chiefs of the Sauk and Fox confederacy to repudiate this agreement of 1804, and subsequently to enter into the conspiracy of Tecumseh and take part with the British in the war of 1812. The treaties of 1815 at Portage des Sioux (with the Foxes) and of 1816 at St Louis (with the Sauk) substantially renewed that of 1804. That of 1816 was signed by Black Hawk himself, who declared, however, when in 1823 Chief Keokuk and a majority of the two nations crossed the river, that the consent of the chiefs had been obtained by fraud. In 1830 a final treaty was signed at Prairie du Chien, by which all title to the lands of the Sauk and Foxes east of the Mississippi was ceded to the government, and provision was made for the immediate opening of the tract to settlers. Black Hawk, leading the party in opposition to Keokuk, at once refused to accede to this cession and threatened to retaliate if his lands were invaded. This precipitated what is known as the Black Hawk War. Settlers began pouring into the new region in the early spring of 1831, and Black Hawk in June attacked several villages near the Illinois-Wisconsin line. After massacring several isolated families, he was driven off by a force of Illinois militia. He renewed his attack in the following year (1832), but after several minor engagements, in most of which he was successful, he was defeated (21st of July) at Wisconsin Heights on the Wisconsin river, opposite Prairie du Sac, by Michigan volunteers under Colonels Henry Dodge and James D. Henry, and fleeing westward was again decisively defeated on the Mississippi at the mouth of the Bad Axe river (on the 1st and 2nd of August) by General Henry Atkinson. His band was completely dispersed, and he himself was captured by a party of Winnebagoes. At Fort Armstrong, Rock Island, on the 21st of September, a treaty was signed, by which a large tract of the Sauk and Fox territory was ceded to the United States; and the United States granted to them a reservation of 400 sq. m., the payment of $20,000 a year for thirty years, and the settlement of certain traders’ claims against the tribe. With several warriors Black Hawk was sent to Fortress Monroe, Virginia, where he was confined for a few weeks; afterwards he was taken by the government through the principal Eastern cities. On his release he settled in 1837 on the Sauk and Fox reservation on the Des Moines river, in Iowa, where he died on the 3rd of October 1838.
BLACK HAWK [Ma‘katawimesheka‘ka, “Black Sparrow Hawk”], (1767-1838), was a Native American warrior from the Sauk and Fox tribes, born in 1767 at the Sauk village on the Rock River, near the Mississippi. He belonged to the Thunder gens of the Sauk tribe and, while he wasn't a hereditary or elected chief, he served for a time as the recognized war leader of the Sauk and Foxes. From a young age, he was intensely aggressive and hostile toward the Americans. Right after the U.S. acquired “Louisiana,” the federal government began plans to relocate the Sauk and Foxes, who had always been a source of tension among the northwestern Indians, to the west bank of the Mississippi River. As early as 1804, a treaty was signed in St. Louis on November 3rd, where they agreed to move in exchange for an annuity of $1,000. British influence remained strong in the upper Mississippi Valley and likely led Black Hawk and the leaders of the Sauk and Fox confederacy to reject this 1804 agreement, ultimately joining Tecumseh's conspiracy and fighting alongside the British in the War of 1812. The treaties of 1815 at Portage des Sioux (with the Foxes) and 1816 at St. Louis (with the Sauk) largely renewed the terms of 1804. The 1816 treaty was signed by Black Hawk, who claimed in 1823 that Chief Keokuk and a majority of their nations had been tricked into consenting. In 1830, a final treaty was signed at Prairie du Chien, which transferred all ownership of Sauk and Fox lands east of the Mississippi to the government and allowed for immediate settlement. Black Hawk, leading opposition against Keokuk, refused to accept this land cession and threatened retaliation if his lands were invaded. This sparked what is known as the Black Hawk War. Settlers began moving into the area in early spring 1831, and in June, Black Hawk attacked several villages near the Illinois-Wisconsin line. After massacring several isolated families, he was pushed back by Illinois militia. He renewed his attacks in 1832, where he had some success in minor engagements but was ultimately defeated on July 21st at Wisconsin Heights on the Wisconsin River, across from Prairie du Sac, by Michigan volunteers led by Colonels Henry Dodge and James D. Henry. He fled westward but was decisively defeated again on the Mississippi at the Bad Axe River (August 1st and 2nd) by General Henry Atkinson. His band was fully dispersed, and he was captured by a group of Winnebagoes. A treaty was signed at Fort Armstrong, Rock Island, on September 21st, giving a large portion of Sauk and Fox land to the United States; in return, the U.S. granted them a reservation of 400 square miles, committed to paying $20,000 a year for thirty years, and settled certain traders’ claims against the tribe. Along with several warriors, Black Hawk was taken to Fortress Monroe, Virginia, where he was detained for several weeks; afterwards, the government showcased him through major Eastern cities. After his release, he settled in 1837 on the Sauk and Fox reservation along the Des Moines River in Iowa, where he passed away on October 3rd, 1838.
See Frank E. Stevens, The Black Hawk War (Chicago, 1903); R.G. Thwaites, “The Story of the Black Hawk War” in vol. xii. of the Collections of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin; J.B. Patterson, Life of Ma-ka-tai-me-she-kia-kiak or Black Hawk (Boston, 1834), purporting to be Black Hawk’s story as told by himself; and Benjamin Drake, Life of Black Hawk (Cincinnati, 1846).
See Frank E. Stevens, The Black Hawk War (Chicago, 1903); R.G. Thwaites, “The Story of the Black Hawk War” in vol. xii. of the Collections of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin; J.B. Patterson, Life of Ma-ka-tai-me-she-kia-kiak or Black Hawk (Boston, 1834), claiming to be Black Hawk’s story as told by himself; and Benjamin Drake, Life of Black Hawk (Cincinnati, 1846).
BLACKHEATH, an open common in the south-east of London, England, mainly in the metropolitan borough of Lewisham. This high-lying tract was crossed by the Roman Watling Street from Kent, on a line approximating to that of the modern Shooter’s Hill; and was a rallying ground of Wat Tyler (1381), of Jack Cade (1450), and of Audley, leader of the Cornish rebels, defeated and captured here by the troops of Henry VII. in 1497. It also witnessed the acclamations of the citizens of London on the return of Henry V. from the victory of Agincourt, the formal meeting between Henry VIII. and Anne of Cleves, and that between the army of the restoration and Charles II. The introduction into England of the game of golf is traditionally placed here in 1608, and attributed to King James I. and his Scottish followers. The common, the area of which is 267 acres, is still used for this and other pastimes. For the residential district to which Blackheath gives name, see Lewisham.
BLACKHEATH, an open common in the southeast of London, England, primarily in the metropolitan borough of Lewisham. This elevated area was traversed by the Roman Watling Street from Kent, roughly following the path of modern Shooter’s Hill; it served as a meeting spot for Wat Tyler (1381), Jack Cade (1450), and Audley, the leader of the Cornish rebels, who was defeated and captured here by Henry VII’s troops in 1497. It also saw the cheers of Londoners upon Henry V’s return from the victory at Agincourt, as well as the official meeting between Henry VIII and Anne of Cleves, and the gathering of the restoration army with Charles II. The introduction of golf to England is traditionally said to have occurred here in 1608, credited to King James I and his Scottish supporters. The common, which spans 267 acres, is still used for this and other leisure activities. For the residential area named after Blackheath, see Lewisham.
BLACK HILLS, an isolated group of mountains, covering an area of about 6000 sq. m. in the adjoining corners of South Dakota and Wyoming, U.S.A. They rise on an average some 2000 ft. above their base, the highest peak, Harney, having an altitude above the sea of 7216 ft. They are drained and in large part enclosed by the North (or Belle Fourche) and South forks of the Cheyenne river (at whose junction a fur-trading post was established about 1830); and are surrounded by semi-arid, alkaline plains lying 3000 to 3500 ft. above the sea. The mass has an elliptical shape, its long axis, which extends nearly N.N.W.-S.S.E., being about 120 m. and its shorter axis about 40 m. long. The hills are formed by a short, broad, anticlinal fold, which is flat or nearly so on its summit. From this fold the stratified beds have in large part been removed, the more recent having been almost entirely eroded from the elevated mass. The edges of these are now found encircling the mountains and forming a series of fairly continuous rims of hog-backs. The carboniferous and older stratified beds still cover the west half of the hills, while from the east half they have been removed, exposing the granite. Scientific exploration began in 1849, and systematic geological investigation about 1875. Rich gold placers had already been discovered, and in 1875 the Sioux Indians within whose territory the hills had until then been included, were removed, and the lands were open to white settlers. Subsequently low-grade quartz mines were found and developed, and have furnished a notable part of the gold supply of the country (about $100,000,000 from 1875 to 1901). The output is to-day relatively small in comparison with that of many other fields, but there are one or two permanent gold mines of great value working low-grade ore. The silver product from 1879 to 1901 was about $4,154,000. Deposits of copper, tin, iron and tungsten have been discovered, and a variety of other mineral products (graphite, mica, spodumene, coal, petroleum, &c.). In sharp contrast to the surrounding plains the climate is subhumid, especially in the higher Harney region. There is an abundance of fertile soil and magnificent grazing land. A third of the total area is covered with forests of pine and other trees, which have for the most part been made a forest-reserve by the national government. Jagged crags, sudden abysses, magnificent canyons, forests with open parks, undulating hills, mountain prairies, freaks of weathering and erosion, and the enclosing lines of the successive hog-backs afford scenery of remarkable variety and wild beauty. There are several interesting limestone caverns, and Sylvan Lake, in the high mountain district, is an important resort.
BLACK HILLS, is an isolated group of mountains that spans about 6000 square miles in the adjoining corners of South Dakota and Wyoming, U.S.A. They rise about 2000 feet above their base on average, with the highest peak, Harney, reaching an elevation of 7216 feet above sea level. The mountains are largely drained and enclosed by the North (or Belle Fourche) and South forks of the Cheyenne River, where a fur-trading post was established around 1830; they are surrounded by semi-arid, alkaline plains sitting at 3000 to 3500 feet above sea level. The range has an elliptical shape, with its long axis extending nearly N.N.W. to S.S.E. at about 120 miles, while the shorter axis is about 40 miles long. The hills are formed by a short, broad anticlinal fold, which is flat or nearly flat at its summit. Much of the stratified layers have been worn away, with the most recent layers almost entirely eroded from the elevated mass. The edges of these layers now encircle the mountains, forming a series of fairly continuous ridges of hog-backs. The carboniferous and older layered rocks still cover the western half of the hills, while the eastern half has been stripped away, exposing the granite beneath. Scientific exploration began in 1849, followed by systematic geological investigation around 1875. Rich gold deposits had already been found, and in 1875 the Sioux Indians, who had inhabited the area, were moved, opening the land to white settlers. Following this, low-grade quartz mines were discovered and developed, contributing significantly to the nation's gold supply (about $100 million from 1875 to 1901). The output today is relatively small compared to many other mining fields, but there are still a few permanent gold mines that extract valuable low-grade ores. Between 1879 and 1901, about $4,154,000 worth of silver was produced. Deposits of copper, tin, iron, and tungsten have been discovered, along with varieties of other minerals (graphite, mica, spodumene, coal, petroleum, etc.). In sharp contrast to the surrounding plains, the climate here is subhumid, especially in the higher Harney region. There is plenty of fertile soil and excellent grazing land. About a third of the total area is covered with forests of pine and other trees, most of which have been designated as a national forest reserve. The landscape features jagged cliffs, deep chasms, stunning canyons, forests with open meadows, rolling hills, mountain prairies, unique weathering and erosion formations, and the defining ridges of the hog-backs, creating scenery of remarkable diversity and wild beauty. There are several intriguing limestone caves, and Sylvan Lake, located in the high mountain area, is a popular destination.
See the publications of the United States Geological Survey (especially Professional Paper No. 26, Economic Resources of the Northern Black Hills, 1904), and of the South Dakota School of Mines (Bulletin No. 4, containing a history and bibliography of Black Hills investigations); also R.L. Dodge, The Black Hills: A Minute Description ... (New York, 1876).
See the publications of the United States Geological Survey (especially Professional Paper No. 26, Economic Resources of the Northern Black Hills, 1904), and of the South Dakota School of Mines (Bulletin No. 4, which includes a history and bibliography of Black Hills investigations); also R.L. Dodge, The Black Hills: A Minute Description ... (New York, 1876).
BLACKIE, JOHN STUART (1809-1895), Scottish scholar and man of letters, was born in Glasgow on the 28th of July 1809. He was educated at the New Academy and afterwards at the Marischal College, in Aberdeen, where his father was manager of the Commerical Bank. After attending classes at Edinburgh University (1825-1826), Blackie spent three years at Aberdeen as a student of theology. In 1829 he went to Germany, and after studying at Göttingen and Berlin (where he came under the influence of Heeren, Ottfried Müller, Schleiermacher, Neander and Böckh) he accompanied Bunsen to Italy and Rome. The years spent abroad extinguished his former wish to enter the Church, and at his father’s desire he gave himself up to the study of law. He had already, in 1824, been placed in a lawyer’s office, but only remained there six months. By the time he was admitted a member of the Faculty of Advocates (1834) he had acquired a strong love of the classics and a taste for letters in 23 general. A translation of Faust, which he published in 1834, met with considerable success. After a year or two of desultory literary work he was (May 1839) appointed to the newly-instituted chair of Humanity (Latin) in the Marischal College.
BLACKIE, JOHN STUART (1809-1895), Scottish scholar and writer, was born in Glasgow on July 28, 1809. He was educated at the New Academy and later at Marischal College in Aberdeen, where his father managed the Commercial Bank. After attending classes at Edinburgh University (1825-1826), Blackie spent three years studying theology in Aberdeen. In 1829, he traveled to Germany and studied at Göttingen and Berlin, where he was influenced by Heeren, Ottfried Müller, Schleiermacher, Neander, and Böckh. He then accompanied Bunsen to Italy and Rome. The time he spent abroad changed his earlier desire to enter the Church, and at his father's request, he focused on studying law. He had already started working in a lawyer’s office in 1824 but only stayed for six months. By the time he became a member of the Faculty of Advocates (1834), he had developed a strong passion for the classics and a taste for literature in 23 general. A translation of Faust, which he published in 1834, was quite successful. After a year or two of random literary work, he was appointed in May 1839 to the newly established chair of Humanity (Latin) at Marischal College.
Difficulties arose in the way of his installation, owing to the action of the Presbytery on his refusing to sign unreservedly the Confession of Faith; but these were eventually overcome, and he took up his duties as professor in November 1841. In the following year he married. From the first his professorial lectures were conspicuous for the unconventional enthusiasm with which he endeavoured to revivify the study of the classics; and his growing reputation, added to the attention excited by a translation of Aeschylus which he published in 1850, led to his appointment in 1852 to the professorship of Greek at Edinburgh University, in succession to George Dunbar, a post which he continued to hold for thirty years. He was somewhat erratic in his methods, but his lectures were a triumph of influential personality. A journey to Greece in 1853 prompted his essay On the Living Language of the Greeks, a favourite theme of his, especially in his later years; he adopted for himself a modern Greek pronunciation, and before his death he endowed a travelling scholarship to enable students to learn Greek at Athens. Scottish nationality was another source of enthusiasm with him; and in this connexion he displayed real sympathy with Highland home life and the grievances of the crofters. The foundation of the Celtic chair at Edinburgh University was mainly due to his efforts. In spite of the many calls upon his time he produced a considerable amount of literary work, usually on classical or Scottish subjects, including some poems and songs of no mean order. He died in Edinburgh on the 2nd of March 1895. Blackie was a Radical and Scottish nationalist in politics, but of a fearlessly independent type; he was one of the “characters” of the Edinburgh of the day, and was a well-known figure as he went about in his plaid, worn shepherd-wise, wearing a broad-brimmed hat, and carrying a big stick. His published works include (besides several volumes of verse) Homer and the Iliad (1866), maintaining the unity of the poems; Four Phases of Morals: Socrates, Aristotle, Christianity, Utilitarianism (1871); Essay on Self-Culture (1874); Horae Hellenicae (1874); The Language and Literature of the Scottish Highlands (1876); The Natural History of Atheism (1877); The Wise Men of Greece (1877); Lay Sermons (1881); Altavona (1882); The Wisdom of Goethe (1883); The Scottish Highlanders and the Land Laws (1885); Life of Burns (1888); Scottish Song (1889); Essays on Subjects of Moral and Social Interest (1890); Christianity and the Ideal of Humanity (1893). Amongst his political writings may be mentioned a pamphlet On Democracy (1867), On Forms of Government (1867), and Political Tracts (1868).
Difficulties came up during his installation due to the Presbytery's reaction when he refused to fully sign the Confession of Faith; however, these issues were eventually resolved, and he began his role as a professor in November 1841. The following year, he got married. From the start, his lectures were known for their unconventional passion as he sought to breathe new life into the study of the classics. His growing reputation, coupled with the attention generated by his 1850 translation of Aeschylus, led to his appointment in 1852 as the Greek professor at Edinburgh University, succeeding George Dunbar, a position he held for thirty years. His methods were somewhat unpredictable, but his lectures were a testament to his strong personality. A trip to Greece in 1853 inspired his essay On the Living Language of the Greeks, a topic he loved, especially in his later years; he adopted a modern Greek pronunciation for himself and, before he died, established a traveling scholarship to help students learn Greek in Athens. Scottish nationality was another source of enthusiasm for him; he showed real empathy for Highland home life and the challenges faced by crofters. His efforts were instrumental in establishing the Celtic chair at Edinburgh University. Despite numerous demands on his time, he produced a significant amount of literary work, mostly on classical or Scottish subjects, including some noteworthy poems and songs. He passed away in Edinburgh on March 2, 1895. Blackie was a Radical and Scottish nationalist in politics, but in a boldly independent way; he was one of the “characters” of Edinburgh at the time, easily recognizable as he moved around in his plaid, worn like a shepherd, with a broad-brimmed hat and a large stick. His published works include (in addition to several volumes of poetry) Homer and the Iliad (1866), which argues for the unity of the poems; Four Phases of Morals: Socrates, Aristotle, Christianity, Utilitarianism (1871); Essay on Self-Culture (1874); Horae Hellenicae (1874); The Language and Literature of the Scottish Highlands (1876); The Natural History of Atheism (1877); The Wise Men of Greece (1877); Lay Sermons (1881); Altavona (1882); The Wisdom of Goethe (1883); The Scottish Highlanders and the Land Laws (1885); Life of Burns (1888); Scottish Song (1889); Essays on Subjects of Moral and Social Interest (1890); and Christianity and the Ideal of Humanity (1893). Among his political writings are a pamphlet On Democracy (1867), On Forms of Government (1867), and Political Tracts (1868).
See Anna M. Stoddart, John Stuart Blackie (1895); A. Stodart-Walker, Selected Poems of J.S. Blackie, with an appreciation (1896); Howard Angus Kennedy, Professor Blackie (1895).
See Anna M. Stoddart, John Stuart Blackie (1895); A. Stodart-Walker, Selected Poems of J.S. Blackie, with an appreciation (1896); Howard Angus Kennedy, Professor Blackie (1895).
BLACK ISLE, The, a district in the east of the county of Ross and Cromarty, Scotland, bounded N. by Cromarty Firth, E. by Moray Firth, S. by Inner Moray Firth (or Firth of Inverness) and Beauly Firth, and W. by the river Conon and the parish of Urray. It is a diamond-shaped peninsula jutting out from the mainland in a north-easterly direction, the longer axis, from Muir of Ord station to the South Sutor at the entrance to Cromarty Firth, measuring 20 m., and the shorter, from Ferryton Point to Craigton-Point, due north and south, 12 m., and it has a coastline of 52 m. Originally called Ardmeanach (Gaelic ard, height; manaich, monk, “the monk’s height,” from an old religious house on the finely-wooded ridge of Mulbuie), it derived its customary name from the fact that, since snow does not lie in winter, the promontory looks black while the surrounding country is white. Within its limits are comprised the parishes of Urquhart and Logie Wester, Killearnan, Knockbain (Gaelic cnoc, hill; bàn, white), Avoch (pron. Auch), Rosemarkie, Resolis (Gaelic rudha or ros soluis, “cape of the light”) or Kirkmichael and Cromarty. The Black Isle branch of the Highland railway runs from Muir of Ord to Fortrose; steamers connect Cromarty with Invergordon and Inverness, and Fortrose with Inverness; and there are ferries, on the southern coast, at North Kessock (for Inverness) and Chanonry (for Fort George), and, on the northern coast, at Alcaig (for Dingwall), Newhallpoint (for Invergordon), and Cromarty (for Nigg). The principal towns are Cromarty and Fortrose. Rosehaugh, near Avoch, belonged to Sir George Mackenzie, founder of the Advocates’ library in Edinburgh, who earned the sobriquet of “Bloody” from his persecution of the Covenanters. Redcastle, on the shore, near Killearnan church, dates from 1179 and is said to have been the earliest inhabited house in the north of Scotland. On the forfeiture of the earldom of Ross it became a royal castle (being visited by Queen Mary), and afterwards passed for a period into the hands of the Mackenzies of Gairloch. The chief industries are agriculture—high farming flourishes owing to the great fertility of the peninsula—sandstone-quarrying and fisheries (mainly from Avoch). The whole district, though lacking water, is picturesque and was once forested. The Mulbuie ridge, the highest point of which is 838 ft. above the sea, occupies the centre and is the only elevated ground. Antiquarian remains are somewhat numerous, such as forts and cairns in Cromarty parish, and stone circles in Urquhart and Logie Wester and Knockbain parishes, the latter also containing a hut circle and rock fortress.
BLACK ISLE, The, a region in the eastern part of Ross and Cromarty, Scotland, is bordered to the north by Cromarty Firth, to the east by Moray Firth, to the south by Inner Moray Firth (or Firth of Inverness) and Beauly Firth, and to the west by the river Conon and the parish of Urray. It's a diamond-shaped peninsula extending from the mainland in a northeast direction, with the longer axis stretching from Muir of Ord station to the South Sutor at the entrance to Cromarty Firth, measuring 20 miles, and the shorter axis from Ferryton Point to Craigton Point, running due north and south, measuring 12 miles, and it has a coastline of 52 miles. Originally named Ardmeanach (Gaelic ard, height; manaich, monk, meaning “the monk’s height,” from an old religious site on the beautifully wooded ridge of Mulbuie), it got its common name because, since snow doesn’t settle in winter, the promontory appears black while the surrounding landscape is white. Within its boundaries are the parishes of Urquhart and Logie Wester, Killearnan, Knockbain (Gaelic cnoc, hill; bàn, white), Avoch (pron. Auch), Rosemarkie, Resolis (Gaelic rudha or ros soluis, “cape of the light”) or Kirkmichael, and Cromarty. The Black Isle branch of the Highland railway runs from Muir of Ord to Fortrose; steamers connect Cromarty with Invergordon and Inverness, and Fortrose with Inverness; there are also ferries on the southern coast at North Kessock (to Inverness) and Chanonry (to Fort George), and on the northern coast at Alcaig (to Dingwall), Newhall Point (to Invergordon), and Cromarty (to Nigg). The main towns are Cromarty and Fortrose. Rosehaugh, near Avoch, belonged to Sir George Mackenzie, who founded the Advocates’ Library in Edinburgh and earned the nickname “Bloody” due to his persecution of the Covenanters. Redcastle, located by the shore near Killearnan church, dates back to 1179 and is said to be the oldest inhabited house in the north of Scotland. After the earldom of Ross was forfeited, it became a royal castle (visited by Queen Mary) and later came into the possession of the Mackenzies of Gairloch for a time. The main industries are agriculture—intensive farming thrives because of the peninsula's high fertility—sandstone quarrying, and fishing (mainly from Avoch). The entire area, though lacking water, is scenic and was once covered in forests. The Mulbuie ridge, the highest point of which is 838 feet above sea level, is situated in the center and is the only elevated terrain. There are quite a few antiquarian remains, such as forts and cairns in Cromarty parish, and stone circles in Urquhart, Logie Wester, and Knockbain parishes, the latter also containing a hut circle and rock fortress.
BLACKLOCK, THOMAS (1721-1791), Scottish poet, the son of a bricklayer, was born at Annan, in Dumfriesshire, in 1721. When not quite six months old he lost his sight by smallpox, and his career is largely interesting as that of one who achieved what he did in spite of blindness. Shortly after his father’s death in 1740, some of Blacklock’s poems began to be handed about among his acquaintances and friends, who arranged for his education at the grammar-school, and subsequently at the university of Edinburgh, where he was a student of divinity. His first volume of Poems was published in 1746. In 1754 he became deputy librarian for the Faculty of Advocates, by the kindness of Hume. He was eventually estranged from Hume, and defended James Beattie’s attack on that philosopher. Blacklock was among the first friends of Burns in Edinburgh, being one of the earliest to recognize his genius. He was in 1762 ordained minister of the church of Kirkcudbright, a position which he soon resigned; in 1767 the degree of doctor in divinity was conferred on him by Marischal College, Aberdeen. He died on the 7th of July 1791.
BLACKLOCK, THOMAS (1721-1791), Scottish poet, the son of a bricklayer, was born in Annan, Dumfriesshire, in 1721. He lost his sight to smallpox when he was just six months old, and his story is particularly remarkable for what he accomplished despite being blind. After his father's death in 1740, some of Blacklock’s poems started circulating among his friends and acquaintances, who supported his education at the grammar school and then at the University of Edinburgh, where he studied theology. His first collection of Poems was published in 1746. In 1754, he became deputy librarian for the Faculty of Advocates, thanks to Hume's generosity. He eventually fell out with Hume and defended James Beattie's critique of that philosopher. Blacklock was one of the first friends of Burns in Edinburgh, being among the earliest to recognize his talent. In 1762, he was ordained as minister of the church of Kirkcudbright, a role he soon resigned; in 1767, Marischal College, Aberdeen, awarded him an honorary Doctor of Divinity degree. He passed away on July 7, 1791.
An edition of his poems in 1793 contains a life by Henry Mackenzie.
An edition of his poems from 1793 includes a biography by Henry Mackenzie.
BLACKMAIL, a term, in English law, used in three special meanings, at different times. The usual derivation of the second half of the word is from Norman Fr. maille (medalia; cf. “medal”), small copper coin; the New English Dictionary derives from “mail” (q.v.), meaning rent or tribute. (1) The primary meaning of “blackmail” was rent paid in labour, grain or baser metal (i.e. money other than sterling money), called reditus nigri, in contradistinction to rent paid in silver or white money (mailles blanches). (2) In the northern counties of England (Northumberland, Westmorland and the bishopric of Durham) it signified a tribute in money, corn, cattle or other consideration exacted from farmers and small owners by freebooters in return for immunity from robbers or moss-troopers. By a statute of 1601 it was made a felony without benefit of clergy to receive or pay such tribute, but the practice lingered until the union of England and Scotland in 1707. (3) The word now signifies extortion of money or property by threats of libel, presecution, exposure, &c. See such headings as Coercion, Conspiracy, Extortion, and authorities quoted under Criminal Law.
BLACKMAIL, a term in English law, has three specific meanings that have evolved over time. The second part of the word is usually derived from the Norman French maille (medalia; cf. “medal”), referring to a small copper coin; the New English Dictionary connects it to “mail” (q.v.), which means rent or tribute. (1) The original meaning of “blackmail” referred to rent paid in labor, grain, or lower-value currency (i.e. money other than sterling), known as reditus nigri, as opposed to rent paid in silver or higher-value currency (mailles blanches). (2) In the north of England (Northumberland, Westmorland, and the bishopric of Durham), it indicated a tribute in cash, grain, livestock, or other goods demanded from farmers and small landowners by outlaws in exchange for protection from thieves or raiders. A law enacted in 1601 made it a felony without benefit of clergy to accept or pay such tribute, but the practice continued until the union of England and Scotland in 1707. (3) Today, the term means extortion of money or property through threats of defamation, prosecution, exposure, etc. See related headings such as Coercion, Conspiracy, Extortion, and sources cited under Criminal Law.
BLACKMORE, SIR RICHARD (c. 1650-1729), English physician and writer, was born at Corsham, in Wiltshire, about 1650. He was educated at Westminster school and St Edmund Hall, Oxford. He was for some time a schoolmaster, but finally, after graduating in medicine at Padua, he settled in practice as a physician in London. He supported the principles of the Revolution, and was accordingly knighted in 1697. He held the office of physician in ordinary both to William III. and Anne, and died on the 9th of October 1729. Blackmore had a 24 passion for writing epics. Prince Arthur, an Heroick Poem in X Books appeared in 1695, and was followed by six other long poems before 1723. Of these Creation ... (1712), a philosophic poem intended to refute the atheism of Vanini, Hobbes and Spinoza, and to unfold the intellectual philosophy of Locke, was the most favourably received. Dr Johnson anticipated that this poem would transmit the author to posterity “among the first favourites of the English muse,” while John Dennis went so far as to describe it as “a philosophical poem, which has equalled that of Lucretius in the beauty of its versification, and infinitely surpassed it in the solidity and strength of its reasoning.” These opinions have not been justified, for the poem, like everything else that Blackmore wrote, is dull and tedious. His Creation appears in Johnson’s and Anderson’s collections of the British poets. He left also works on medicine and on theological subjects.
BLACKMORE, SIR RICHARD (c. 1650-1729), was an English physician and writer born in Corsham, Wiltshire, around 1650. He was educated at Westminster School and St Edmund Hall, Oxford. For a time, he worked as a schoolmaster, but after graduating in medicine from Padua, he established a medical practice in London. He supported the Revolution's principles and was knighted in 1697. He served as the physician to both William III and Anne and passed away on October 9, 1729. Blackmore had a strong passion for writing epics. His work Prince Arthur, an Heroick Poem in X Books was published in 1695, followed by six other lengthy poems before 1723. Among these, Creation ... (1712), a philosophical poem aimed at refuting the atheism of Vanini, Hobbes, and Spinoza, while also exploring Locke's intellectual philosophy, received the most positive reception. Dr. Johnson believed this poem would ensure the author’s place among the first favorites of English poetry, while John Dennis went as far as to call it “a philosophical poem that equals Lucretius in the beauty of its verse and far surpasses it in the strength of its reasoning.” However, these assessments have not held up, as the poem, like all of Blackmore's works, is considered dull and tedious. His Creation is included in both Johnson's and Anderson's collections of British poets. He also wrote on medical and theological topics.
BLACKMORE, RICHARD DODDRIDGE (1825-1900), English novelist, was born on the 7th of June 1825 at Longworth, Berkshire, of which village his father was curate in charge. He was educated at Blundell’s school, Tiverton, and Exeter College, Oxford, where he obtained a scholarship. In 1847 he took a second class in classics. Two years later he entered as a student at the Middle Temple, and was called to the bar in 1852. His first publication was a volume of Poems by Melanter (1854), which showed no particular promise, nor did the succeeding volume, Epullia (1855), suggest that Blackmore had the makings of a poet. He was nevertheless enthusiastic in his pursuit of literature; and when, a few years later, the complete breakdown of his health rendered it clear that he must remove from London, he determined to combine a literary life in the country with a business career as a market-gardener. He acquired land at Teddington, and set earnestly to work, the literary fruits of his new surroundings being a translation of the Georgics, published in 1862. In 1864 he published his first novel, Clara Vaughan, the merits of which were promptly recognized. Cradock Nowell (1866) followed, but it was in 1869 that he suddenly sprang into fame with Lorna Doone. This fine story was a pioneer in the romantic revival; and appearing at a jaded hour, it was presently recognized as a work of singular charm, vigour and imagination. Its success could scarcely be repeated, and though Blackmore wrote many other capital stories, of which the best known are The Maid of Sker (1872), Christowell (1880), Perlycross (1894), Tales from the Telling House (1896) and Dariel (1897), he will always be remembered almost exclusively as the author of Lorna Doone. He continued his quiet country life to the last, and died at Teddington on the 20th of January 1900, in his seventy-fifth year. Lorna Doone has the true out-of-door atmosphere, is shot through and through with adventurous spirit, and in its dramatic moments shows both vigour and intensity. The heroine, though she is invested with qualities of faëry which are scarcely human, is an idyllic and haunting figure; and John Ridd, the bluff hero, is, both in purpose and achievement, a veritable giant of romance. The story is a classic of the West country, and the many pilgrimages that are made annually to the Doone Valley (the actual characteristics of which differ materially from the descriptions given in the novel) are entirely inspired by the buoyant imagination of Richard Blackmore. A memorial window and tablet to his memory were erected in Exeter cathedral in 1904.
BLACKMORE, RICHARD DODDRIDGE (1825-1900), English novelist, was born on June 7, 1825, in Longworth, Berkshire, where his father was the village curate. He was educated at Blundell’s School in Tiverton and Exeter College, Oxford, where he received a scholarship. In 1847, he earned a second class in classics. Two years later, he began studying at the Middle Temple and was called to the bar in 1852. His first publication was a book of Poems by Melanter (1854), which showed no particular promise, and neither did the next volume, Epullia (1855), suggest that Blackmore had the potential to be a poet. Nevertheless, he was enthusiastic about literature; when a few years later, his health declined and it became clear he needed to leave London, he decided to pursue a literary life in the countryside while also starting a career as a market gardener. He bought land in Teddington and got to work, resulting in a translation of the Georgics, published in 1862. In 1864, he published his first novel, Clara Vaughan, which was quickly recognized for its quality. Cradock Nowell (1866) followed, but it was in 1869 that he suddenly became famous with Lorna Doone. This remarkable story was a forerunner of the romantic revival; appearing at a time when audiences were tired of typical narratives, it was soon acknowledged as a work of unique charm, energy, and imagination. Its success was hard to duplicate, and although Blackmore wrote many other notable stories, including The Maid of Sker (1872), Christowell (1880), Perlycross (1894), Tales from the Telling House (1896), and Dariel (1897), he will always be primarily remembered as the author of Lorna Doone. He continued his peaceful country life until the end and died in Teddington on January 20, 1900, at the age of seventy-five. Lorna Doone captures the true atmosphere of the outdoors, is filled with adventurous spirit, and its dramatic moments exhibit both energy and intensity. The heroine, although endowed with qualities that are almost magical, is an enchanting and memorable figure; John Ridd, the rugged hero, is, in both his purpose and accomplishments, a true giant of romance. The story is a classic of the West Country, and the many annual visits to the Doone Valley (the actual characteristics of which differ significantly from those described in the novel) are entirely inspired by Richard Blackmore's vibrant imagination. A memorial window and tablet in his honor were set up in Exeter Cathedral in 1904.
BLACK MOUNTAIN, a mountain range and district on the Hazara border of the North-West Frontier Province of India. It is inhabited by Yusafzai Pathans. The Black Mountain itself has a total length of 25 to 30 m., and an average height of 8000 ft. above the sea. It rises from the Indus basin near the village of Kiara, up to its watershed by Bruddur; thence it runs north-west by north to the point on the crest known as Chittabut. From Chittabut the range runs due north, finally descending by two large spurs to the Indus again. The tribes which inhabit the western face of the Black Mountain are the Hassanzais (2300 fighting men), the Akazais (1165 fighting men) and the Chagarzais (4890 fighting men), all sub-sections of the Yusafzai Pathans. It was in this district that the Hindostani Fanatics had their stronghold, and they were responsible for much of the unrest on this part of the border.
BLACK MOUNTAIN, is a mountain range and area located on the Hazara border of the North-West Frontier Province of India. It's home to the Yusafzai Pathans. The Black Mountain itself stretches about 25 to 30 miles long, with an average height of 8,000 feet above sea level. It rises from the Indus basin near the village of Kiara, reaching its watershed by Bruddur; from there, it extends northwest to a peak known as Chittabut. From Chittabut, the range goes directly north, eventually sloping down by two large spurs back to the Indus River. The tribes living on the western side of Black Mountain include the Hassanzais (2,300 fighting men), the Akazais (1,165 fighting men), and the Chagarzais (4,890 fighting men), all of which are sub-sections of the Yusafzai Pathans. This area was where the Hindostani Fanatics had their base, and they played a significant role in the unrest along this section of the border.
The Black Mountain is chiefly notable for four British expeditions:—
The Black Mountain is mainly known for four British expeditions:—
1. Under Lieut.-Colonel F. Mackeson, in 1852-53, against the Hassanzais. The occasion was the murder of two British customs officers. A force of 3800 British troops traversed their country, destroying their villages and grain, &c.
1. Under Lieutenant Colonel F. Mackeson, in 1852-53, against the Hassanzais. The reason was the murder of two British customs officers. A force of 3,800 British troops marched through their territory, destroying their villages, crops, etc.
2. Under Major-General A.T. Wilde, in 1868. The occasion was an attack on a British police post at Oghi in the Agror Valley by all three tribes. A force of 12,500 British troops entered the country and the tribes made submission.
2. Under Major-General A.T. Wilde, in 1868. The occasion was an attack on a British police post at Oghi in the Agror Valley by all three tribes. A force of 12,500 British troops entered the area and the tribes surrendered.
3. The First Hazara Expedition in 1888. The cause was the constant raids made by the tribes on villages in British territory, culminating in an attack on a small British detachment, in which two English officers were killed. A force of 12,500 British troops traversed the country of the tribes, and severely punished them. Punishment was also inflicted on the Hindostani Fanatics of Palosi.
3. The First Hazara Expedition in 1888. The reason for this was the ongoing attacks by the tribes on villages within British territory, which peaked with an assault on a small British unit that resulted in the deaths of two English officers. A force of 12,500 British troops moved through the tribes' land and dealt them harsh consequences. Punishment was also meted out to the Hindostani Fanatics of Palosi.
4. The Second Hazara Expedition of 1891. The Black Mountain tribes fired on a force within British limits. A force of 7300 British troops traversed the country. The tribesmen made their submission and entered into an agreement with government to preserve the peace of the border.
4. The Second Hazara Expedition of 1891. The Black Mountain tribes shot at a group within British territory. A force of 7,300 British troops moved through the region. The tribesmen surrendered and reached an agreement with the government to maintain peace along the border.
The Black Mountain tribes took no part in the general frontier rising of 1897, and after the disappearance of the Hindostani Fanatics they sank into comparative unimportance.
The Black Mountain tribes did not participate in the general frontier uprising of 1897, and after the disappearance of the Hindostani fanatics, they faded into relative obscurity.
BLACKPOOL, a municipal and county borough and seaside resort in the Blackpool parliamentary division of Lancashire, England, 46 m. N. of Liverpool, served by the Lancashire & Yorkshire, and London & North Western railways. Pop. (1891) 23,846; (1901) 47,346. The town, which is quite modern, contains many churches and chapels of all denominations, a town hall, public libraries, the Victoria hospital, three piers, theatres, ball-rooms, and other places of public amusement, including a lofty tower, resembling the Eiffel Tower of Paris. The municipality maintains an electric tram service. There are handsome promenades along the sea front, which command fine views. Extensive works upon these, affording a sea front unsurpassed by that of any English watering-place, were completed in 1905. The beach is sandy and the bathing good. The borough was created in 1876 (county borough, 1904), and is governed by a mayor, 12 aldermen and 36 councillors. Area, exclusive of foreshore, 3496 acres; including foreshore, 4244 acres.
BLACKPOOL, is a town and county borough and a seaside resort in the Blackpool parliamentary division of Lancashire, England, located 46 miles north of Liverpool. It’s served by the Lancashire & Yorkshire, and London & North Western railways. Population: (1891) 23,846; (1901) 47,346. The town, which is quite modern, features many churches and chapels of various denominations, a town hall, public libraries, the Victoria Hospital, three piers, theaters, ballrooms, and other entertainment venues, including a tall tower that looks like the Eiffel Tower in Paris. The municipality runs an electric tram service. There are beautiful promenades along the waterfront that offer great views. Major improvements to these promenades, creating a waterfront that's unmatched by any other English seaside resort, were completed in 1905. The beach is sandy and the swimming is good. The borough was established in 1876 (county borough in 1904) and is governed by a mayor, 12 aldermen, and 36 councillors. Area, not including foreshore, 3,496 acres; including foreshore, 4,244 acres.
BLACK ROD (more fully, “Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod “), an official of the House of Lords, instituted in 1350. His appointment is by royal letters patent, and his title is due to his staff of office, an ebony stick surmounted with a gold lion. He is a personal attendant of the sovereign in the Upper House, and is also usher of the order of the Garter, being doorkeeper at the meetings of the knights’ chapter. He is responsible for the maintenance of order in the House of Lords, and on him falls the duty of arresting any peer guilty of breach of privilege or other offence of which the House takes cognizance. But the duty which brings him most into prominence is that of summoning the Commons and their speaker to the Upper House to hear a speech from the throne or the royal assent given to bills. If the sovereign is present in parliament, Black Rod commands the attendance of the gentlemen of the Commons, but when lords commissioners represent the king, he only desires such attendance. Black Rod is on such occasions the central figure of a curious ceremony of much historic significance. As soon as the attendants of the House of Commons are aware of his approach, they close the doors in his face. Black Rod then strikes three times with his staff, and on being asked “Who is there?” replies “Black Rod.” Being then admitted he advances to the bar of the House, makes three obeisances and says, “Mr Speaker, the king commands this honourable House to attend his majesty immediately in the House of Lords.” This formality originated in the famous attempt of Charles I. to arrest the five members, Hampden, Pym, Holies, Hesilrige and Strode, in 1642. Indignant 25 at this breach of privilege, the House of Commons has ever since maintained its right of freedom of speech and uninterrupted debate by the closing of the doors on the king’s representative.
BLACK ROD (formally known as the “Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod”), is an official of the House of Lords, established in 1350. His role is appointed by royal letters patent, and his title comes from his staff of office, which is an ebony stick topped with a gold lion. He serves as a personal attendant to the sovereign in the Upper House and is also the usher of the Order of the Garter, acting as the doorkeeper during the knights' chapter meetings. His responsibilities include maintaining order in the House of Lords, and he is tasked with arresting any peer who breaches privilege or commits other offenses recognized by the House. However, the most notable duty he has is summoning the Commons and their speaker to the Upper House to hear a speech from the throne or the royal assent given to bills. When the sovereign is present in Parliament, Black Rod commands the presence of the gentlemen of the Commons, but when lords commissioners represent the king, he merely requests their attendance. During such occasions, Black Rod becomes the central figure in a peculiar ceremony with significant historical importance. As soon as the attendants of the House of Commons notice his approach, they close the doors on him. Black Rod then strikes three times with his staff, and when asked “Who is there?” he replies “Black Rod.” Once admitted, he steps to the bar of the House, makes three bows, and states, “Mr Speaker, the king commands this honorable House to attend his majesty immediately in the House of Lords.” This formality dates back to the infamous attempt by Charles I to arrest the five members, Hampden, Pym, Holies, Hesilrige, and Strode, in 1642. Outraged by this infringement of privilege, the House of Commons has since upheld its right to freedom of speech and uninterrupted debate by closing its doors on the king’s representative. 25
BLACK SEA (or Euxine; anc. Pontus Euxinus),1 a body of water lying almost entirely between the latitudes 41º and 45º N., but extending to about 47º N. near Odessa. It is bounded N. by the southern coast of Russia; W. by Rumania, Turkey and Bulgaria; S. and E. by Asia Minor. The northern boundary is broken at Kertch by a strait entering into the Sea of Azov, and at the junction of the western and southern boundary is the Bosporus, which unites the Black Sea with the Mediterranean through the Sea of Marmora and the Dardanelles. The 100-fathom line is about 10 to 20 m. from the shore except in the north-west corner between Varna and Sevastopol, where it extends 140 m. seawards. The greatest depth is 1030 fathoms (1227 Russian fathoms) near the centre, there being only one basin. The steepest incline outside 100 fathoms is to the south-east of the Crimea and at Amastra; the incline to the greater depths is also steep off the Caucasus and between Trebizond and Batum. The conditions that prevail in the Black Sea are very different from those of the Mediterranean or any other sea. The existence of sulphuretted hydrogen in great quantities below 100 fathoms, the extensive chemical precipitation of calcium carbonate, the stagnant nature of its deep waters, and the absence of deep-sea life are conditions which make it impossible to discuss it along with the physical and biological conditions of the Mediterranean proper.
BLACK SEA (or Black Sea; formerly Pontus Euxinus),1 is a body of water situated almost entirely between latitudes 41º and 45º N but stretching to about 47º N near Odessa. It is bordered to the north by the southern coast of Russia; to the west by Romania, Turkey, and Bulgaria; and to the south and east by Asia Minor. The northern boundary is interrupted at Kertch by a strait that leads into the Sea of Azov, and where the western and southern boundaries meet is the Bosporus, which connects the Black Sea to the Mediterranean via the Sea of Marmora and the Dardanelles. The 100-fathom line is about 10 to 20 meters from the shore except in the north-west corner between Varna and Sevastopol, where it stretches 140 meters out to sea. The deepest point is 1030 fathoms (1227 Russian fathoms) near the center, with only one basin. The steepest slope outside of 100 fathoms is to the southeast of Crimea and at Amastra; the slope to deeper waters is also steep off the Caucasus and between Trebizond and Batum. The conditions in the Black Sea are very different from those in the Mediterranean or any other sea. The presence of large amounts of hydrogen sulfide below 100 fathoms, the widespread chemical precipitation of calcium carbonate, the stagnant nature of its deep waters, and the lack of deep-sea life create conditions that make it impossible to compare with the physical and biological conditions of the Mediterranean itself.
The depths of the Black Sea are lifeless, higher organic life not being known to exist below 100 fathoms. Fossiliferous remains of Dreissena, Cardium and other molluscs have, however, been dredged up, which help to show that conditions formerly existed in the Black Sea similar to those that exist at the present day in the Caspian Sea. According to N. Andrusov, when the union of the Black Sea with the Mediterranean through the Bosporus took place, salt water rushed into it along the bottom of the Bosporus and killed the fauna of the less saline waters. This gave rise to a production of sulphuretted hydrogen which is found in the deposits, as well as in the deeper waters.
The depths of the Black Sea are devoid of life, with no known organic life existing below 100 fathoms. However, fossil remains of Dreissena, Cardium, and other mollusks have been dredged up, indicating that conditions in the Black Sea used to be similar to those currently found in the Caspian Sea. According to N. Andrusov, when the Black Sea connected with the Mediterranean through the Bosporus, saltwater poured in from the bottom of the Bosporus and wiped out the fauna of the less salty waters. This led to the production of hydrogen sulfide, which can be found in the deposits as well as in the deeper waters.
Observations in temperature and salinity have only been taken during summer. During summer the surface salinity of the Black Sea is from 1.70 to 2.00% down to 50 fathoms, whereas in the greater depths it attains a salinity of 2.25%. The temperature is rather remarkable, there being an intermediate cold layer between 25 and 50 fathoms. This is due to the sinking of the cold surface water (which in winter reaches freezing-point) on to the top of the denser more saline water of the greater depths. There is thus a minimum circulation in the greater depths causing there uniformity of temperature, an absence of the circulation of oxygen by other means than diffusion, and a protection of the sulphuretted hydrogen from the oxidation which takes place in homologous situations in the open ocean. The temperature down to 25 fathoms is from 78.3º to 46.2º F., and in the cold layer, between 25 and 50 fathoms, is from 46.2º to 43.5º F., rising again in greater depths to 48.2º F.
Observations of temperature and salinity have only been conducted during the summer. In summer, the surface salinity of the Black Sea ranges from 1.70 to 2.00% down to 50 fathoms, while at greater depths, it reaches a salinity of 2.25%. The temperature is quite notable, featuring an intermediate cold layer between 25 and 50 fathoms. This occurs because the cold surface water (which can reach freezing point in winter) sinks onto the top of the denser, saltier water at greater depths. As a result, there is minimal circulation in the deeper areas, leading to uniform temperature, a lack of oxygen circulation other than through diffusion, and a protection of the hydrogen sulfide from the oxidation that happens in similar areas of the open ocean. The temperature from the surface down to 25 fathoms ranges from 78.3º to 46.2º F., and in the cold layer between 25 and 50 fathoms, it ranges from 46.2º to 43.5º F., rising again in deeper waters to 48.2º F.
The Sea of Marmora may be looked upon as an arm of the Aegean Sea and thus part of the Mediterranean proper. Its salinity is comparable to that of the eastern basin of the Mediterranean, which is greater than that of the Black Sea, viz. 4%. Similar currents exist in the Bosporus to those of the Strait of Gibraltar. Water of less salinity flows outwards from the Black Sea as an upper current, and water of greater salinity from the Sea of Marmora flows into the Black Sea as an under-current. This under-current flows towards Cape Tarhangut, where it divides into a left and right branch. The left branch is appreciably noticed near Odessa and the north-west corner; the right branch sweeps past the Crimea, strikes the Caucasian shore (where it comes to the surface running across, but not into, the south-east corner of the Black Sea), and finally disperses flowing westwards along the northern coast of Asia Minor between Cape Jason and Sinope. This current causes a warmer climate where it strikes. So marked is this current that it has to be taken into account in the navigation of the Black Sea.
The Sea of Marmora can be seen as an extension of the Aegean Sea, and thus a part of the Mediterranean proper. Its salinity is similar to that of the eastern basin of the Mediterranean, which is higher than that of the Black Sea, at about 4%. Comparable currents are found in the Bosporus, similar to those in the Strait of Gibraltar. Less salty water flows out from the Black Sea as an upper current, while saltier water from the Sea of Marmora flows into the Black Sea as a lower current. This lower current heads towards Cape Tarhangut, where it splits into left and right branches. The left branch is noticeably present near Odessa and the northwestern corner; the right branch moves past Crimea, touches the Caucasian shore (where it comes to the surface but does not enter the southeastern corner of the Black Sea), and eventually spreads westward along the northern coast of Asia Minor between Cape Jason and Sinope. This current creates a warmer climate where it makes landfall. The strength of this current is so significant that it must be considered when navigating the Black Sea.
The Sea of Azov is exceedingly shallow, being only about 6 fathoms in its deepest part, and it is largely influenced by the river Don. Its water is considerably fresher than the Black Sea, varying from 1.55 to 0.68%. It freezes more readily and is not affected by the Mediterranean current.
The Sea of Azov is very shallow, with its deepest part being around 6 fathoms, and it is heavily influenced by the River Don. Its water is much fresher than that of the Black Sea, ranging from 1.55 to 0.68%. It freezes more easily and is not impacted by the Mediterranean current.
See N. Andrusov, “Physical Exploration of the Black Sea,” in Geographical Journal, vol. i. p. 49.
See N. Andrusov, “Physical Exploration of the Black Sea,” in Geographical Journal, vol. i. p. 49.
1 The early Greek navigators gave it the epithet of axenus, i.e. unfriendly to strangers, but as Greek colonies sprang up on the shores this was changed to euxinus, friendly to strangers.
1 The early Greek navigators called it axenus, meaning unfriendly to strangers, but as Greek colonies began to appear along the shores, this was changed to euxinus, meaning friendly to strangers.
BLACK SEA (Russ. Chernomorskaya), a military district of the province of Kuban, formerly an independent province of Transcaucasia, Russia; it includes the narrow strip of land along the N.E. coast of the Black Sea from Novorossiysk to the vicinity of Pitsunda, between the sea and the crest of the main range of the Caucasus. Area, 2836 sq. m. Pop. (1897) 54,228; (1906, estimate) 71,900. It is penetrated by numerous spurs of this range, which strike the sea abruptly at right angles to the coast, and in many cases plunge down into it sheer. Owing to its southern exposure, its sheltered position, and a copious rainfall, vegetation, in part of a sub-tropical character, grows in great profusion. In consequence, however, of the mountainous character of the region, it is divided into a large number of more or less isolated districts, and there is little intercourse with the country north of the Caucasus, the passes over the range being few and difficult (see Caucasus). But since the Russians became masters of this region, its former inhabitants (Circassian tribes) have emigrated in thousands, so that the country is now only thinly inhabited. It is divided into three districts—Novorossiysk, with the town (pop. in 1897, 16,208) of the same name, which acts as the capital of the Black Sea district; Velyaminovsk; and Sochi. Novorossiysk is connected by rail, at the west end of the Caucasus, with the Rostov-Vladikavkaz line, and a mountain road leads from Velyaminovsk (or Tuapse) to Maikop in the province of Kuban.
BLACK SEA (Russ. Chernomorskaya), a military district in the province of Kuban, which used to be an independent province of Transcaucasia, Russia; it covers the narrow strip of land along the northeast coast of the Black Sea from Novorossiysk to near Pitsunda, between the sea and the main ridge of the Caucasus mountains. Area: 2,836 sq. mi. Population (1897): 54,228; (estimate for 1906): 71,900. The area is penetrated by many spurs of this mountain range, which extend abruptly to the sea at right angles to the coast, often dropping directly into the water. Due to its southern exposure, sheltered position, and abundant rainfall, vegetation, some of it subtropical, grows abundantly. However, because of the mountainous terrain, the region is divided into many more or less isolated areas, resulting in limited interaction with the territory north of the Caucasus, as there are only a few difficult mountain passes (see Caucasus). Since the Russians took control of this area, many of the former inhabitants (Circassian tribes) have emigrated in large numbers, leaving the region sparsely populated. It consists of three districts: Novorossiysk, which includes the town of the same name (population in 1897: 16,208) that serves as the capital of the Black Sea district; Velyaminovsk; and Sochi. Novorossiysk is connected by rail at the western end of the Caucasus to the Rostov-Vladikavkaz line, and a mountain road leads from Velyaminovsk (or Tuapse) to Maikop in the province of Kuban.
BLACKSTONE, SIR WILLIAM (1723-1780), English jurist, was born in London, on the 10th of July 1723. His parents having died when he was young, his early education, under the care of his uncle, Dr Thomas Bigg, was obtained at the Charterhouse, from which, at the age of fifteen, he was sent to Pembroke College, Oxford. He was entered in the Middle Temple in 1741. In 1744 he was elected a fellow of All Souls’ College. From this period he divided his time between the university and the Temple, where he took chambers in order to attend the law courts. In 1746 he was called to the bar. Though but little known or distinguished as a pleader, he was actively employed, during his occasional residences at the university, in taking part in the internal management of his college. In May 1749, as a small reward for his services, and to give him further opportunities of advancing the interests of the college, Blackstone was appointed steward of its manors. In the same year, on the resignation of his uncle, Seymour Richmond, he was elected recorder of the borough of Wallingford in Berkshire. In 1750 he became doctor of civil law. In 1753 he decided to retire from London work to his fellowship and an academical life, still continuing the practice of his profession as a provincial counsel.
BLACKSTONE, SIR WILLIAM (1723-1780), English jurist, was born in London on July 10, 1723. His parents died when he was young, and his early education was overseen by his uncle, Dr. Thomas Bigg, at the Charterhouse. At fifteen, he was sent to Pembroke College, Oxford. He joined the Middle Temple in 1741. In 1744, he was elected a fellow of All Souls’ College. From this point on, he divided his time between the university and the Temple, where he rented chambers to attend the law courts. In 1746, he was called to the bar. Although not well-known or particularly successful as a lawyer, he was actively involved in the internal management of his college during his occasional stays at the university. In May 1749, as a small reward for his services and to give him more chances to promote the college's interests, Blackstone was appointed steward of its manors. In the same year, after his uncle resigned, he was elected recorder of the borough of Wallingford in Berkshire. In 1750, he became a doctor of civil law. By 1753, he decided to step back from work in London to focus on his fellowship and an academic life, while still practicing as a provincial counsel.
His lectures on the laws of England appear to have been an early and favourite idea; for in the Michaelmas term immediately after he abandoned London, he entered on the duty of reading them at Oxford; and we are told by the author of his Life, that even at their commencement, the high expectations formed from the acknowledged abilities of the lecturer attracted to these lectures a very crowded class of young men of the first families, characters and hopes. Bentham, however, declares that he was a “formal, precise and affected lecturer—just what you would expect from the character of his writings—cold, reserved and wary, exhibiting a frigid pride.” It was not till the year 1758 that the lectures in the form they now bear were read in the university. Blackstone, having been unanimously elected to the newly-founded Vinerian professorship, on the 25th of October read his first introductory lecture, afterwards prefixed to the first volume of his celebrated Commentaries. It is doubtful 26 whether the Commentaries were originally intended for the press; but many imperfect and incorrect copies having got into circulation, and a pirated edition of them being either published or preparing for publication in Ireland, the author thought proper to print a correct edition himself, and in November 1765 published the first volume, under the title of Commentaries on the Laws of England. The remaining parts of the work were given to the world in the course of the four succeeding years. It may be remarked that before this period the reputation which his lectures had deservedly acquired for him had induced him to resume practice in London; and, contrary to the general order of the profession, he who had quitted the bar for an academic life was sent back from the college to the bar with a considerable increase of business. He was likewise elected to parliament, first for Hindon, and afterwards for Westbury in Wilts; but in neither of these departments did he equal the expectations which his writings had raised. The part he took in the Middlesex election drew upon him many attacks as well as a severe animadversion from the caustic pen of “Junius.” This circumstance probably strengthened the aversion he professed to parliamentary attendance, “where,” he said, “amidst the rage of contending parties, a man of moderation must expect to meet with no quarter from any side.” In 1770 he declined the place of solicitor-general; but shortly afterwards, on the promotion of Sir Joseph Yates to a seat in the court of common pleas, he accepted a seat on the bench, and on the death of Sir Joseph succeeded him there also. He died on the 14th of February 1780.
His lectures on English law seem to have been an early and favored idea; because in the Michaelmas term right after he left London, he took on the responsibility of teaching them at Oxford. According to the author of his Life, even at the start, the high expectations based on the lecturer's recognized abilities drew a large group of young men from prominent families, backgrounds, and ambitions to these lectures. However, Bentham noted that he was a “formal, precise, and affected lecturer—exactly what you’d expect from the nature of his writings—cold, distant, and cautious, displaying a frosty pride.” It wasn't until 1758 that the lectures were presented in the form we know today at the university. Blackstone, having been unanimously elected to the newly established Vinerian professorship, delivered his first introductory lecture on October 25, which was later included in the first volume of his famous Commentaries. It’s unclear whether the Commentaries were originally meant for publication, but since many faulty and incorrect copies were circulated and a pirated edition was either published or in preparation in Ireland, the author decided to publish a correct edition himself. In November 1765, he released the first volume titled Commentaries on the Laws of England. The other parts of the work were published over the next four years. It’s worth noting that prior to this time, the reputation his lectures had justly earned him prompted him to return to practice in London; and, contrary to the usual trend in the profession, he who had left the bar for an academic career was sent back from the college to the bar with a significant increase in business. He was also elected to Parliament, first for Hindon, and later for Westbury in Wilts; but in neither of these roles did he meet the expectations set by his writings. His involvement in the Middlesex election brought him many criticisms, including harsh commentary from the sharp pen of “Junius.” This situation likely reinforced his stated dislike for attending Parliament, where he claimed, “amidst the fury of competing parties, a moderate man must expect to receive no mercy from any side.” In 1770, he turned down the position of solicitor-general; but shortly after, when Sir Joseph Yates was promoted to the Court of Common Pleas, he accepted a position on the bench and took over after Sir Joseph’s death. He passed away on February 14, 1780.
The design of the Commentaries is exhibited in his first Vinerian lecture printed in the introduction to them. The author there dwells on the importance of noblemen, gentlemen and educated persons generally being well acquainted with the laws of the country; and his treatise, accordingly, is as far as possible a popular exposition of the laws of England. Falling into the common error of identifying the various meanings of the word law, he advances from the law of nature (being either the revealed or the inferred will of God) to municipal law, which he defines to be a rule of civil conduct prescribed by the supreme power in a state commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong. On this definition he founds the division observed in the Commentaries. The objects of law are rights and wrongs. Rights are either rights of persons or rights of things. Wrongs are either public or private. These four headings form respectively the subjects of the four books of the Commentaries.
The design of the Commentaries is outlined in his first Vinerian lecture included in the introduction. In it, the author emphasizes how important it is for nobles, gentlemen, and educated people to be well-informed about the laws of the country. His treatise is designed to be as accessible as possible, providing a clear overview of the laws of England. He makes the common mistake of confusing the different meanings of the word law, moving from the law of nature (which can be understood as either the revealed or inferred will of God) to municipal law, which he defines as a rule of civil conduct set by the supreme authority in a state, dictating what is right and forbidding what is wrong. This definition serves as the basis for the structure seen in the Commentaries. The goals of law are to address rights and wrongs. Rights can be either personal or property rights. Wrongs can be classified as either public or private. These four categories correspond to the subjects of the four books of the Commentaries.
Blackstone was by no means what would now be called a scientific jurist. He has only the vaguest possible grasp of the elementary conceptions of law. He evidently regards the law of gravitation, the law of nature, and the law of England, as different examples of the same principle—as rules of action or conduct imposed by a superior power on its subjects. He propounds in terms the doctrine that municipal or positive laws derive their validity from their conformity to the so-called law of nature or law of God. “No human laws,” he says, “are of any validity if contrary to this.” His distinction between rights of persons and rights of things, implying, as it would appear, that things as well as persons have rights, is attributable to a misunderstanding of the technical terms of the Roman law. In distinguishing between private and public wrongs (civil injuries and crimes) he fails to seize the true principle of the division. Austin, who accused him of following slavishly the method of Hale’s Analysis of the Law, declares that he “blindly adopts the mistakes of his rude and compendious model; missing invariably, with a nice and surprising infelicity, the pregnant but obscure suggestions which it proffered to his attention, and which would have guided a discerning and inventive writer to an arrangement comparatively just.” By the want of precise and closely-defined terms, and his tendency to substitute loose literary phrases, he falls occasionally into irreconcilable contradictions. Even in discussing a subject of such immense importance as equity, he hardly takes pains to discriminate between the legal and popular senses of the word, and, from the small place which equity jurisprudence occupies in his arrangement, he would scarcely seem to have realized its true position in the law of England. Subject, however, to these strictures the completeness of the treatise, its serviceable if not scientific order, and the power of lucid exposition possessed by the author demand emphatic recognition. Blackstone’s defects as a jurist are more conspicuous in his treatment of the underlying principles and fundamental divisions of the law than in his account of its substantive principles.
Blackstone was definitely not what we would now call a scientific jurist. He has only the vaguest understanding of the basic concepts of law. He clearly sees the law of gravitation, the law of nature, and the law of England as different examples of the same principle—rules of action or conduct imposed by a higher authority on its subjects. He states the idea that municipal or positive laws get their legitimacy from their alignment with the so-called law of nature or law of God. “No human laws,” he says, “are valid if they contradict this.” His distinction between the rights of individuals and the rights of property suggests, as it seems, that property as well as individuals has rights, which stems from a misunderstanding of the technical terminology of Roman law. When he distinguishes between private and public wrongs (civil injuries and crimes), he misses the true principle behind that division. Austin, who accused him of blindly following Hale’s Analysis of the Law, claims that he “blindly adopts the mistakes of his rough and concise model; invariably missing, with a nice yet surprising ineptness, the meaningful but obscure suggestions that it offered him, which would have directed a perceptive and innovative writer to a more just arrangement.” Due to his lack of precise and clearly defined terms and his tendency to use vague literary phrases, he sometimes falls into conflicting contradictions. Even when discussing a topic as significant as equity, he barely makes an effort to differentiate between the legal and popular meanings of the term, and given the minor role that equity jurisprudence plays in his framework, he seems not to have understood its true place in English law. Nevertheless, despite these criticisms, the completeness of the treatise, its useful if not scientific organization, and the author's clear writing style deserve strong acknowledgment. Blackstone's flaws as a jurist are more evident in how he addresses the foundational principles and core divisions of the law than in his treatment of its substantive principles.
Blackstone by no means confines himself to the work of a legal commentator. It is his business, especially when he touches on the framework of society, to find a basis in history and reason for all the most characteristic English institutions. There is not much either of philosophy or fairness in this part of his work. Whether through the natural conservatism of a lawyer, or through his own timidity and subserviency as a man and a politician, he is always found to be a specious defender of the existing order of things. Bentham accuses him of being the enemy of all reform, and the unscrupulous champion of every form of professional chicanery. Austin says that he truckled to the sinister interests and mischievous prejudices of power, and that he flattered the overweening conceit of the English in their own institutions. He displays much ingenuity in giving a plausible form to common prejudices and fallacies; but it is by no means clear that he was not imposed upon himself. More undeniable than the political fairness of the treatise is its merits as a work of literature. It is written in a most graceful and attractive style, and although no opportunity of embellishment has been lost, the language is always simple and clear. Whether it is owing to its literary graces, or to its success in flattering the prejudices of the public to which it was addressed, the influence of the book in England has been extraordinary. Not lawyers only, and lawyers perhaps even less than others, accepted it as an authoritative revelation of the law. It performed for educated society in England much the same service as was rendered to the people of Rome by the publication of their previously unknown laws. It is more correct to regard it as a handbook of the law for laymen than as a legal treatise; and as the first and only book of the kind in England it has been received with somewhat indiscriminating reverence. It is certain that a vast amount of the constitutional sentiment of the country has been inspired by its pages. To this day Blackstone’s criticism of the English constitution would probably express the most profound political convictions of the majority of the English people. Long after it has ceased to be of much practical value as an authority in the courts, it remains the arbiter of all public discussions on the law or the constitution. On such occasions the Commentaries are apt to be construed as strictly as if they were a code. It is curious to observe how much importance is attached to the ipsissima verba of a writer who aimed more at presenting a picture intelligible to laymen than at recording the principles of the law with technical accuracy of detail.
Blackstone definitely doesn't limit himself to being just a legal commentator. His role, especially when discussing the structure of society, is to find a historical and rational basis for all the key English institutions. There isn’t much philosophy or fairness in this part of his work. Whether due to the natural conservatism of a lawyer or his own fearfulness and submissiveness as a person and a politician, he often comes across as a superficial defender of the current status quo. Bentham accused him of opposing all reform and being a ruthless supporter of every type of legal trickery. Austin stated that he catered to the harmful interests and prejudices of those in power and flattered the inflated pride of the English in their own institutions. He shows a lot of creativity in giving a convincing shape to common biases and misconceptions; however, it’s not clear that he wasn’t misled himself. More certain than the political fairness of the treatise are its qualities as a piece of literature. It’s written in a very elegant and appealing style, and even though it doesn’t miss any chance for embellishment, the language remains straightforward and clear. Whether due to its literary charm or its ability to cater to the biases of its intended audience, the book has had an extraordinary influence in England. It wasn't just lawyers—perhaps even less so than others—who accepted it as an authoritative source of law. It served educated society in England much like the previously unknown laws did for the people of Rome when they were published. It’s more accurate to view it as a legal handbook for non-lawyers rather than a legal treatise; and as the first and only book of its kind in England, it has been received with a somewhat uncritical reverence. It’s clear that a massive amount of the country’s constitutional sentiment has been shaped by its pages. Even today, Blackstone's critique of the English constitution probably reflects the deepest political beliefs of the majority of the English people. Long after it has lost much of its practical value as an authority in the courts, it continues to be the reference point for all public discussions on law or the constitution. During these discussions, the Commentaries are often interpreted as strictly as if they were a code. It’s interesting to see how much weight is given to the ipsissima verba of a writer who aimed more at creating a picture that was understandable to non-lawyers than at documenting the legal principles with precise detail.
See also the article English Law.
See also the article English Law.
BLACK VEIL, in the Roman Catholic Church, the symbol of the most complete renunciation of the world and adoption of a nun’s life. On the appointed day the nun goes through all the ritual of the marriage ceremony, after a solemn mass at which all the inmates of the convent assist. She is dressed in bridal white with wreath and veil, and receives a wedding-ring, as spouse of the Church. Afterwards she presides at a wedding-breakfast, at which a bride-cake is cut. She thus bids adieu to all her friends, and having previously taken the white veil, the betrothal, she now assumes the black, and for ever forswears the world and its pleasures. Her hair is cut short, and her bridal robes are exchanged for the sombre religious habit. Her wedding-ring, however, she continues to wear, and it is buried with her.
BLACK VEIL, in the Roman Catholic Church, symbolizes the complete renunciation of the world and the choice to live as a nun. On the designated day, the nun goes through all the rituals of a marriage ceremony, following a solemn mass attended by everyone in the convent. She wears a bridal white dress, a wreath, and a veil, and receives a wedding ring as the spouse of the Church. Afterward, she hosts a wedding breakfast, where a bride cake is cut. This is her farewell to all her friends, and after previously donning the white veil for her betrothal, she now puts on the black veil, forever renouncing the world and its pleasures. Her hair is cut short, and her bridal garments are replaced by the somber religious habit. However, she continues to wear her wedding ring, which is buried with her.
BLACKWATER, the name of a number of rivers and streams in England, Scotland and Ireland. The Blackwater in Essex, which rises near Saffron Walden, has a course of about 40 m. to the North Sea. The most important river of the name is in southern Ireland, rising in the hills on the borders of the counties Cork and Kerry, and flowing nearly due east for the greater part of its course, as far as Cappoquin, where it turns abruptly southward, and discharges through an estuary into Youghal Bay. 27 The length of its valley (excluding the lesser windings of the river) is about 90 m., and the drainage area about 1300 sq. m. It is navigable only for a few miles above the mouth, but its salmon fisheries are both attractive to sportsmen and of considerable commercial value. The scenery of its banks is at many points very beautiful.
BLACKWATER, is the name of several rivers and streams in England, Scotland, and Ireland. The Blackwater in Essex, which starts near Saffron Walden, flows about 40 miles to the North Sea. The most significant river with this name is located in southern Ireland, originating in the hills on the borders of County Cork and County Kerry, and flowing mostly east for most of its route, up to Cappoquin, where it sharply turns south and empties into Youghal Bay through an estuary. 27 The length of its valley (not counting the smaller twists of the river) is about 90 miles, with a drainage area of around 1300 square miles. It’s navigable only for a few miles upstream from the mouth, but its salmon fisheries are appealing to anglers and have significant commercial value. The scenery along its banks is quite beautiful at many points.
BLACKWATER FEVER, a disease occurring in tropical countries and elsewhere, which is often classed with malaria (q.v.). It is characterized by irregular febrile paroxysms, accompanied by rigors, bilious vomiting, jaundice and haemoglobinuria (Sambon). It has a wide geographical distribution, including tropical Africa, parts of Asia, the West Indies, the southern United States, and—in Europe—Greece, Sicily and Sardinia; but its range is not coextensive with malaria. Malarial parasites have occasionally been found in the blood. Some authorities believe it to be caused by the excessive use of quinine, taken to combat malaria. This theory has had the support of Koch, but it is not generally accepted. If it were correct, one would expect blackwater fever to be regularly prevalent in malarial countries and to be more or less coextensive with the use of quinine, which is not at all the case. It often resembles yellow fever, but the characteristic black vomit of yellow fever rarely occurs in blackwater fever, while the black urine from which the latter derives its name is equally rare in the former. According to the modern school of tropical parasitology, blackwater fever is neither a form of malaria nor produced by quinine, but a specific disease due to a protozoal parasite akin to that which causes the redwater fever of cattle.
BLACKWATER FEVER, is a disease found in tropical countries and other regions, often grouped with malaria (q.v.). It features irregular bouts of fever, chills, vomiting bile, jaundice, and blood in the urine (Sambon). It occurs in various areas, including tropical Africa, parts of Asia, the West Indies, the southern United States, and in Europe—Greece, Sicily, and Sardinia; however, its range doesn't perfectly match that of malaria. Malarial parasites have been occasionally discovered in the bloodstream. Some experts think it’s caused by excessive use of quinine, which is taken to fight malaria. This idea has backing from Koch but isn’t widely accepted. If it were true, we would expect blackwater fever to be common in areas where malaria is present and to be closely linked to quinine use, which is not the case. It often mimics yellow fever, but the characteristic black vomit of yellow fever is uncommon in blackwater fever, while the black urine that gives blackwater its name is also seldom seen in yellow fever. According to modern tropical parasitology, blackwater fever is not a type of malaria and isn't caused by quinine; it's a specific disease caused by a protozoal parasite similar to the one that leads to the redwater fever in cattle.
BLACKWELL, THOMAS (1701-1757), Scottish classical scholar, was born at Aberdeen on the 4th of August 1701. He took the degree of M.A. at the Marischal College in 1718. He was appointed professor of Greek in 1723, and was principal of the institution from 1748 until his death on the 8th of March 1757. In 1735 his first work, An Inquiry into the Life and Writings of Homer, was published anonymously. It was reprinted in 1736, and followed (in 1747) by Proofs of the Enquiry into Homer’s Life and Writings, a translation of the copious notes in foreign languages which had previously appeared. This work, intended to explain the causes of the superiority of Homer to all the poets who preceded or followed him, shows considerable research, and contains many curious and interesting details; but its want of method made Bentley say that, when he had gone through half of it, he had forgotten the beginning, and, when he had finished the reading of it, he had forgotten the whole. Blackwell’s next work (also published anonymously in 1748) was Letters Concerning Mythology. In 1752 he took the degree of doctor of laws, and in the following year published the first volume of Memoirs of the Court of Augustus; the second volume appeared in 1755, the third in 1764 (prepared for the press, after Blackwell’s death, by John Mills). This work shows considerable originality and erudition, but is even more unmethodical than his earlier writings and full of unnecessary digressions. Blackwell has been called the restorer of Greek literature in the north of Scotland; but his good qualities were somewhat spoiled by pomposity and affectation, which exposed him to ridicule.
BLACKWELL, THOMAS (1701-1757), Scottish classical scholar, was born in Aberdeen on August 4, 1701. He earned his M.A. degree from Marischal College in 1718. He became the professor of Greek in 1723 and served as the principal of the institution from 1748 until his death on March 8, 1757. His first work, An Inquiry into the Life and Writings of Homer, was published anonymously in 1735. It was reprinted in 1736, followed by Proofs of the Inquiry into Homer’s Life and Writings in 1747, which translated extensive notes in foreign languages that had appeared earlier. This work aimed to explain why Homer was superior to all poets before and after him, demonstrating significant research and containing many fascinating details; however, its lack of organization led Bentley to comment that by the time he was halfway through, he had forgotten the beginning, and by the end, he had forgotten the whole thing. Blackwell's next work, also published anonymously in 1748, was Letters Concerning Mythology. In 1752, he earned a doctorate in law, and the following year he published the first volume of Memoirs of the Court of Augustus; the second volume came out in 1755, and the third in 1764, prepared for publication by John Mills after Blackwell's death. This work displays considerable originality and scholarly depth, but it is even less organized than his earlier writings and filled with unnecessary digressions. Blackwell has been referred to as the restorer of Greek literature in northern Scotland; however, his positive qualities were somewhat diminished by his pomposity and affectation, which made him a target of ridicule.
BLACKWOOD, WILLIAM (1776-1834), Scottish publisher, founder of the firm of William Blackwood & Sons, was born of humble parents at Edinburgh on the 20th of November 1776. At the age of fourteen he was apprenticed to a firm of booksellers in Edinburgh, and he followed his calling also in Glasgow and London for several years. Returning to Edinburgh in 1804, he opened a shop in South Bridge Street for the sale of old, rare and curious books. He undertook the Scottish agency for John Murray and other London publishers, and gradually drifted into publishing on his own account, removing in 1816 to Princes Street. On the 1st of April 1817 was issued the first number of the Edinburgh Monthly Magazine, which on its seventh number, bore the name of Blackwood’s as the leading part of the title. “Maga,” as this magazine soon came to be called, was the organ of the Scottish Tory party, and round it gathered a host of able writers. William Blackwood died on the 16th of September 1834, and was succeeded by his two sons, Alexander and Robert, who added a London branch to the firm. In 1845 Alexander Blackwood died, and shortly afterwards Robert.
BLACKWOOD, WILLIAM (1776-1834), a Scottish publisher, founded the company William Blackwood & Sons. He was born to humble parents in Edinburgh on November 20, 1776. At fourteen, he started an apprenticeship with a bookseller in Edinburgh, and he later worked in Glasgow and London for several years. After returning to Edinburgh in 1804, he opened a shop on South Bridge Street selling old, rare, and interesting books. He took on the Scottish agency for John Murray and other London publishers, gradually starting his own publishing business and moving to Princes Street in 1816. The first issue of the Edinburgh Monthly Magazine was published on April 1, 1817, and by the seventh issue, it was known as Blackwood’s. The magazine, nicknamed “Maga,” became the voice of the Scottish Tory party and attracted many talented writers. William Blackwood passed away on September 16, 1834, and was succeeded by his two sons, Alexander and Robert, who expanded the firm by adding a London branch. Alexander Blackwood died in 1845, followed shortly by Robert.
A younger brother, John Blackwood (1818-1879), succeeded to the business; four years later he was joined by Major William Blackwood, who continued in the firm until his death in 1861. In 1862 the major’s elder son, William Blackwood (b. 1836), was taken into partnership. John Blackwood was a man of strong personality and great business discernment; it was in the pages of his magazine that George Eliot’s first stories, Scenes of Clerical Life, appeared. He also inaugurated the “Ancient Classics for English readers” series. On his death Mr William Blackwood was left in sole control of the business. With him were associated his nephews, George William and J.H. Blackwood, sons of Major George Blackwood, who was killed at Maiwand in 1880.
A younger brother, John Blackwood (1818-1879), took over the business; four years later, he was joined by Major William Blackwood, who stayed with the firm until his death in 1861. In 1862, the major’s older son, William Blackwood (b. 1836), became a partner. John Blackwood was a person with a strong personality and sharp business sense; it was in the pages of his magazine that George Eliot’s first stories, Scenes of Clerical Life, were published. He also started the “Ancient Classics for English readers” series. After his death, Mr. William Blackwood was left in sole control of the business. He was joined by his nephews, George William and J.H. Blackwood, sons of Major George Blackwood, who was killed at Maiwand in 1880.
See Annals of a Publishing House; William Blackwood and his Sons ... (1897-1898), the first two volumes of which were written by Mrs Oliphant; the third, dealing with John Blackwood, by his daughter, Mrs Gerald Porter.
See Annals of a Publishing House; William Blackwood and his Sons ... (1897-1898), the first two volumes of which were written by Mrs. Oliphant; the third, focusing on John Blackwood, was written by his daughter, Mrs. Gerald Porter.
BLADDER (from A.S. blaēddre, connected with blāwan, to blow, cf. Ger. blase), the membranous sac in animals which receives the urine secreted from the kidneys. The word is also used for any similar sac, such as the gall-bladder, the swim-bladder in fishes, or the small vesicle in various seaweeds.
BLADDER (from A.S. blaēddre, related to blāwan, to blow, see Ger. blase), is the membranous sac in animals that collects urine produced by the kidneys. This term is also used for any similar sac, like the gallbladder, the swim bladder in fish, or the small vesicle found in various seaweeds.
BLADDER AND PROSTATE DISEASES. The urinary bladder in man (for the anatomy see Urinary System), being the temporary reservoir of the renal secretion, and, as such, containing the urine for longer or shorter periods, is liable to various important affections. These are dealt with in the first part of this article. The diseases of the prostate are so intimately allied that they are best considered, as in the subsequent section, as part of the same subject.
Bladder and prostate diseases. The urinary bladder in men (for the anatomy see Urinary System), which serves as the temporary storage for kidney secretions and holds urine for varying lengths of time, is subject to several significant issues. These are addressed in the first part of this article. The diseases of the prostate are so closely related that it makes sense to discuss them together in the following section as part of the same topic.
Diseases of the Bladder.
Bladder Diseases.
Cystitis, or inflammation of the bladder, which may be acute or chronic, is due to the invasion of the mucous lining by micro-organisms, which gain access either from the urethra, the kidneys or the blood-stream. It is easy to see how Cystitis. the diplococci of gonorrhoea may infect the bladder-membrane by direct extension of the inflammation, and how the bacilli which are swarming in the neighbouring bowel may find access to the urethra or bladder when the intervening tissues have been rendered penetrable by a wound or by inflammation. Sometimes, however, especially in the female, the germs from the large intestine enter the bladder by way of the vulva and the urethra.
Cystitis, or bladder inflammation, which can be acute or chronic, is caused by microorganisms invading the mucous lining. They can enter through the urethra, kidneys, or bloodstream. It's clear how the gonorrhea diplococci can infect the bladder membrane through direct extension of inflammation, and how bacteria from the nearby bowel can reach the urethra or bladder when the surrounding tissues have been damaged by a wound or inflammation. Sometimes, especially in women, germs from the large intestine can enter the bladder through the vulva and urethra.
Any condition leading to disturbance of the function of the bladder, such as enlargement of the prostate, stricture of the urethra, stone, or injury, may cause cystitis by preparing the way for bacillary invasion. The bacilli of tuberculosis and of typhoid fever may set up cystitis by coming down into the bladder from the kidneys with the urine, or they reach it by the blood-stream, or invade it by the urethra. Another way of cystitis being set up is by the introduction of the germs of suppuration by a catheter or bougie sweeping them in from the urethra; or the instrument itself may be unsterilized and dirty and so may introduce them. It used formerly to be thought that wet or cold was enough to cause inflammation of the bladder, but the probability is that this acts only by lowering the resistance of the lining membrane of the bladder, and preparing it for the invasion of the germs which were merely waiting for an opportunity. In the same way, gout or injury may lead to the lurking bacilli being enabled to effect their attack. But in every case disease-germs are the cause of the trouble, and they may be found in the urine. The first effect of inflammation is to render the bladder irritable, so that as soon as a few drops of urine have collected, the individual has intense or uncontrollable desire to micturate. The effort may be very painful and may be accompanied by bleeding from the overloaded blood-vessels of the inflamed membrane. In addition to blood, pus is likely to be found in the urine, which by this time is alkaline and ammoniacal, and teeming with micro-organisms. As regards treatment, the patient should be at once sent to bed in a warm room, and should 28 sit several times a day in a very hot hip-bath. When he has got back to bed, a fomentation under oil-silk, or some other waterproof material, should be placed over the lower part of the abdomen. The diet should be milk (diluted with hot or cold water), barley-water, and bread and butter; no alcoholic drink should be allowed. If the urine is acid, bicarbonate of soda may be given, or citrate of soda; if alkaline, urotropine—a derivative of formic aldehyde—may prove a useful urinary disinfectant. If the straining and distress are great, a suppository of ¼ or ½ a grain of morphia may be introduced into the rectum every two or three hours. The bowels must be kept freely open. If the urine is foul, the bladder should be frequently washed out by a soft catheter and two or three feet of india-rubber tubing with a funnel at the other end, weak and abundant hot lotions of Sanitas or Condy’s fluid being used.
Any condition that disrupts the bladder's function, such as an enlarged prostate, urethral stricture, stones, or injury, can lead to cystitis by allowing bacteria to invade. The bacteria from tuberculosis and typhoid fever can cause cystitis by traveling from the kidneys to the bladder through urine, entering through the bloodstream, or invading through the urethra. Another way cystitis can develop is through germs introduced by a catheter or bougie that brings them in from the urethra, or the instrument itself could be unsterilized and contaminate the bladder. It was once believed that wet or cold conditions alone were enough to cause bladder inflammation, but it’s more likely that they lower the bladder's lining resistance, making it easier for lurking germs to invade. Similarly, gout or injury can allow dormant bacteria to launch an attack. In every case, disease-causing germs are the underlying issue and can be detected in the urine. The initial result of inflammation is to make the bladder irritable; thus, as soon as a small amount of urine accumulates, the person feels a strong or uncontrollable urge to urinate. This effort can be very painful and may be accompanied by bleeding from the swollen blood vessels in the inflamed membrane. Besides blood, pus is typically present in the urine, which is usually alkaline and ammoniacal, filled with microorganisms. In terms of treatment, the patient should be placed in bed right away in a warm room and should sit several times a day in a very hot hip bath. Once back in bed, a fomentation covered with oil-silk or another waterproof material should be applied to the lower abdomen. The diet should consist of milk (diluted with hot or cold water), barley water, and bread and butter; no alcoholic beverages should be permitted. If the urine is acidic, bicarbonate of soda or citrate of soda can be given; if alkaline, urotropine—a derivative of formic aldehyde—might be a helpful urinary disinfectant. If the straining and discomfort are severe, a ¼ or ½ grain morphine suppository may be inserted into the rectum every two to three hours. The bowels should be kept regularly open. If the urine is foul, the bladder should be regularly rinsed with a soft catheter and two or three feet of rubber tubing with a funnel at the end, using weak and plentiful hot solutions of Sanitas or Condy’s fluid.
Chronic cystitis is the condition left when the acute symptoms have passed away, but it is liable at any moment to resume the acute condition. If the cystitis is very intractable, refusing to yield to hot irrigations, and to washings with nitrate of silver lotion, it may be advisable to open the bladder from the front, and to explore, treat, drain and rest it.
Chronic cystitis is what remains once the acute symptoms have subsided, but it can easily flare up again at any time. If the cystitis is very stubborn and doesn't respond to hot irrigations or treatments with silver nitrate solution, it might be a good idea to surgically open the bladder from the front to examine, treat, drain, and give it a chance to rest.
In tuberculous cystitis there is added to the symptoms the discovery of the bacilli of tuberculosis in the urine, and cystoscopic examination may reveal the presence of tubercles of the mucous membrane or even of ulceration. The patient is probably losing weight, and he may present foci of tuberculosis at the back of the testicle, the lung or kidney, or in a joint or bone, or in a lymphatic gland. Treatment is rebellious and unpromising. Washings and lotions give but temporary relief, and if the bladder is opened for rest, and for a more direct treatment, the germs of suppuration may enter, and, working in conjunction with the bacilli, may cause great havoc. Koch’s tuberculin treatment should certainly be given a trial. This consists of the injection into the body of an emulsion of dead tubercle bacilli which have been sterilized by heat. As a result of this injection the blood sets to work to form an “opsonin”—a protective material which so modifies the disease-germs as to render them attractive to the white corpuscles of the patient’s blood (phagocytes), which then seize upon and destroy them. Sir A.E. Wright has devised a delicate method of examination of the blood (the calculation of the opsonic index) which tells when the tuberculin injections should be resorted to and when withheld (see Blood).
In tuberculous cystitis, additional symptoms include detecting tuberculosis bacilli in the urine, and a cystoscopy may show tubercles on the mucous membrane or even ulceration. The patient is likely losing weight and may have tuberculosis lesions in the back of the testicle, lungs or kidneys, or in a joint, bone, or lymphatic gland. Treatment is challenging and not very promising. Washes and lotions provide only temporary relief, and if the bladder is surgically opened for rest and more direct treatment, the germs causing infection may enter, potentially causing significant damage when combined with the bacilli. Koch’s tuberculin treatment should definitely be explored. This involves injecting a mixture of dead tubercle bacilli that have been sterilized by heat into the body. In response to this injection, the blood starts producing an “opsonin”—a protective substance that alters the disease-causing germs, making them more appealing to the patient’s white blood cells (phagocytes), which then attack and destroy them. Sir A.E. Wright developed a precise method for examining the blood (the opsonic index calculation) that indicates when tuberculin injections should be administered and when they should be stopped (see Blood).
Calculi and Gravel.—Uric acid is deposited from the urine either as small crystals resembling cayenne pepper, or else, in combination with soda and ammonia, as an amorphous “brick-dust” deposit, which, on cooling, leaves a red stain on Stone. the bottom of the vessel, soluble in hot water. These substances are derived from the disintegration of nitrogenized food taken in excess of demand, and from the breaking down of the human tissues. They occur therefore in fevers, in wasting diseases, and in the normal subject after excessive muscular exercises, especially if these exercises have been accompanied with so much perspiration that the excess of water from the blood has escaped by the skin rather than by the kidneys. The abundance of this deposit is in accordance with the amount of heat developed and work done in the body, and corresponds with the dust and ashes raked out of the fire-box of the locomotive after a long run. But supposing that the uric acid débris continues to be excessive, the risk of the formation of renal or vesical calculi becomes considerable, and it may be advisable to place the patient on a restricted nitrogenized diet, to induce him to drink large quantities of water, and to keep his bowels so loose with watery laxatives, such as Epsom salts or sulphate of soda, that the waste products of his body are made to escape by the bowels rather than by the kidneys. In addition to the salts just mentioned, an occasional dose of blue pill will prove helpful. A course of treatment at Contrexéville or Carlsbad may be taken with advantage.
Calculi and Gravel.—Uric acid is found in urine either as tiny crystals that look like cayenne pepper, or, when combined with soda and ammonia, as a cloudy “brick-dust” deposit that leaves a red stain on the bottom of the container when it cools. This deposit is soluble in hot water. These substances come from breaking down excess nitrogen-rich food and from the degradation of body tissues. Therefore, they show up in fevers, chronic illnesses, and in healthy individuals after intense exercise, especially if that exercise has caused enough sweating for water to leave the blood via the skin instead of the kidneys. The amount of this deposit relates to how much heat and work the body is producing and is comparable to the dust and ashes collected from a train's firebox after a long journey. However, if there is an ongoing excess of uric acid waste, the risk of developing kidney or bladder stones becomes significant. In such cases, it might be advisable to put the patient on a low-nitrogen diet, encourage them to drink lots of water, and use watery laxatives like Epsom salts or sulfate of soda to ensure that waste products exit through the bowels instead of the kidneys. Additionally, occasional doses of blue pill can be beneficial. A treatment course at Contrexéville or Carlsbad may also be advantageous.
Alkaline urine is unable to hold the phosphates of ammonia and magnesia in solution, so they are deposited in abundance either in the kidney or bladder. If the voided urine is allowed to stand in a tall glass they sink to the bottom with pus and mucus in a cloudy deposit. To remedy this condition it is necessary to treat the cystitis with which the bacterial decomposition of the urine is associated. It may be that a calculus of acid urine, such as one of uric acid or oxalate of lime, has been resting in the bladder and keeping up incessant irritation, and that the micro-organisms of decomposition or suppuration have found their way to the mucous lining of the bladder from either the bowel, the urethra or the blood-stream; undergoing cultivation there they break up the urea into carbonate of ammonia and so render the urine alkaline. This alkaline urine deposits its phosphates, which light upon the calculus and encrust it with a mortary shell, which may go on increasing in size until it may even fill the bladder. Sometimes the nucleus of a calculus is a chip of bone or a blood-clot, or some foreign substance which has been introduced into the bladder. Sooner or later the urine becomes alkaline and the calculus is encrusted with lime salts.
Alkaline urine can't keep the phosphates of ammonia and magnesia dissolved, so they build up in the kidneys or bladder. If the urine is left to sit in a tall glass, these substances settle at the bottom along with pus and mucus, creating a cloudy residue. To fix this issue, it's essential to treat the cystitis that's linked with the bacterial breakdown of the urine. A stone formed from acid urine, like uric acid or calcium oxalate, might be sitting in the bladder, causing constant irritation, and bacteria involved in decomposition or pus formation could have reached the bladder's mucous lining from the bowel, urethra, or bloodstream. There, they multiply and break down the urea into ammonia, which makes the urine alkaline. This alkaline urine then deposits its phosphates, which settle on the stone and coat it with a hard shell that can grow large enough to fill the bladder. Sometimes, the core of a stone is a piece of bone, a blood clot, or another foreign object introduced into the bladder. Eventually, the urine becomes alkaline, and the stone gets covered in lime salts.
When urine contains a larger amount of chemical constituents than it can conveniently hold in solution, a certain quantity crystallizes out, and may be deposited in the kidney or in the bladder. If the crystals run together in the kidney the resulting concretion may either remain in that organ or may find its way into the bladder, where it may remain to form the nucleus of a larger vesical calculus, or, especially in the case of females, it may, while still small, escape from the bladder during micturition.
When urine has more chemical substances than it can easily dissolve, some of them crystallize and may settle in the kidney or bladder. If the crystals clump together in the kidney, the resulting mass may stay there or move to the bladder, where it could become the center of a larger bladder stone. In females, it might even pass out of the bladder when urinating while still small.
In children, in whom there is a rapid disintegration of nitrogenized tissues, a uric acid calculus in escaping from the bladder may block the urethra and give rise to sudden retention of urine. On introducing a metal “sound,” the surgeon may strike the stone, and if it happens to be near the bladder he may push it back and subsequently remove it by crushing. But if it has made its way some distance along the urethra, so that he can feel it from the outside, he should remove it by a clean incision.
In children, where there is a quick breakdown of nitrogen-rich tissues, a uric acid stone leaving the bladder can block the urethra and cause sudden urine retention. When a metal “sound” is used, the surgeon may hit the stone, and if it’s near the bladder, he can push it back and later remove it by crushing. However, if it has moved a considerable distance along the urethra and can be felt from the outside, he should remove it with a clean incision.
A stone in the bladder worries the nerves of the mucous membrane, and, giving them the impression that the bladder contains much water, causes the desire and need for micturition to be constant. The irritation causes an excessive secretion of mucus, just as a piece of grit under the eyelid causes a constant running from the eye. So the urine, if allowed to stand, gives a copious deposit. During micturition the contracting bladder bruises its congested blood-vessels against the stone, so that towards the end of micturition blood appears in the urine. Lastly, cystitis occurs, and the urine contains fetid pus. A stone in the bladder gives rise to pain at the end of the penis, and it is apt suddenly to stop the flow of urine during micturition.
A stone in the bladder irritates the nerves of the mucous membrane, making them feel like the bladder is full of water, which leads to a constant urge to urinate. This irritation causes an excessive production of mucus, similar to how a grain of sand under the eyelid causes persistent tearing. If urine is allowed to sit, it will produce a thick sediment. When urinating, the contracting bladder presses its swollen blood vessels against the stone, which can result in blood appearing in the urine towards the end of urination. Additionally, cystitis develops, and the urine becomes filled with foul-smelling pus. A bladder stone causes pain at the tip of the penis and can suddenly interrupt the flow of urine during urination.
The association of any of these symptoms leads the surgeon to suspect the presence of a stone in the bladder, and he confirms his suspicions by introducing a slender steel rod, a “sound,” by which he strikes and feels the stone. Further confirmation may be obtained by the help of the X-rays, or, in the adult, by using a cystoscope. In a child the stone may often be felt by a finger in the rectum, the front of the bladder being pressed by a hand on the lower part of the abdomen. The cystoscope is a straight, hollow metal tube about the size of a long cedar pencil, which the surgeon introduces into the adult bladder, which has already been filled with warm boracic lotion. Down the tube run two fine wires which control a minute electric lamp at the bladder end of the instrument. At that end also is a small glass window which prevents the fluid escaping by the tube, and also a prism; at the other end of the tube is an eye-piece. By the use of this slender speculum the practised surgeon can recognize the presence of tubercle or tuberculous ulceration of the bladder, stone, or other foreign material, and innocent or malignant growths. He can also watch the urine entering the bladder by the openings of the ureters, and determine from which kidney blood or pus is coming.
The presence of any of these symptoms makes the surgeon suspect there might be a stone in the bladder, and he confirms his suspicion by using a slender steel rod called a “sound,” which he uses to tap and feel for the stone. Further confirmation can be achieved using X-rays or, in adults, by using a cystoscope. In children, the stone can often be felt by inserting a finger into the rectum while pressing on the lower abdomen. The cystoscope is a straight, hollow metal tube about the size of a long pencil, which the surgeon inserts into the adult bladder that has already been filled with warm boracic lotion. Inside the tube are two fine wires that control a tiny electric lamp at the bladder end of the instrument. That end also has a small glass window to prevent fluid from escaping through the tube, along with a prism; the other end has an eyepiece. Using this slim speculum, an experienced surgeon can identify the presence of tuberculosis or tuberculous ulceration of the bladder, stones, or other foreign objects, as well as benign or malignant growths. He can also observe urine entering the bladder through the openings of the ureters and determine which kidney is producing blood or pus.
The treatment of stone in the bladder is governed by various conditions. Speaking generally, the surgeon prefers to introduce a lithotrite and crush the stone into small fragments, and then to flush out the fragments by using a full-sized, hollow metal catheter and an india-rubber wash-bottle. Even in children this operation may generally be adopted with success, the stone being crushed to atoms and the fragments being washed out to 29 the last small chip. But if the stone is a very hard one (as are some of the oxalate of lime calculi), or if it is very large, or if the bladder or the prostate gland is in a state of advanced disease, or if the urethra is not roomy enough to admit instruments of adequate calibre, the crushing operation (lithotrity) must be deemed unsuitable, and the stone must be removed by a cutting operation (lithotomy).
The treatment of bladder stones depends on several factors. Generally, the surgeon prefers to use a lithotrite to break the stone into small pieces and then flush out those pieces with a full-sized, hollow metal catheter and a rubber wash bottle. This procedure can usually be performed successfully on children as well, allowing the stone to be crushed to tiny bits and the pieces to be washed out to 29 the last small fragment. However, if the stone is particularly hard (like some oxalate of lime stones), very large, if the bladder or prostate is severely diseased, or if the urethra isn't wide enough for the necessary instruments, the crushing procedure (lithotrity) is not appropriate, and the stone must be removed through surgery (lithotomy).
Lithotomy.—Cutting for stone has been long practised; but up to the beginning of the 19th century it was performed only by a few men, who, bolder than their contemporaries, had specially worked at that operation and had attained celebrity as skilful lithotomists. Patients went long distances to be operated on by them, and certain of the older surgeons, as William Cheselden, performed a large number of operations with most excellent results. The operation was by an incision from the perineum, and is ordinarily spoken of as lateral lithotomy. It was splendidly designed, and gave good results, especially in children. But it is now a thing of the past, having almost entirely given place to the high or supra-pubic operation. In the high operation the patient, being duly prepared, is placed upon his back and the bladder is washed out with hot boracic lotion, and when the lotion returns quite clean a final injection is made until the bladder is felt rising above the pubes. Then the india-rubber tube is removed from the silver catheter by which the injection has been made, and the end of the catheter is plugged by a spigot. An incision is then made in the middle line of the abdomen over the bladder region. The incision must be kept as low as possible, so that the bladder may be reached below the peritoneum, which, higher up, gives it an external, serous coat. As the bladder is approached, a good many veins are seen to be in the way, some of which have to be wounded. The bladder-wall is recognized by its coarse network of pale muscular fibres, through which, on each side of the middle line, a strong suture is passed, so that when the bladder is opened and the lotion comes rushing out, the opening which has been made into the bladder may not sink into the depths of the pelvis. A finger introduced into the bladder makes out the exact size and position of the stone, or stones, and the removal is effected by special forceps. Bleeding having ceased, the bladder-wound is partly or entirely closed by sutures and allowed to fall into the pelvis, the catheter having been removed. It is advisable to leave a drainage tube in the abdominal wound for a while, so that if urine leaks from the bladder-wound it may find a ready escape to the dressings.
Lithotomy.—Cutting for stones has been practiced for a long time; however, until the early 19th century, it was only done by a few individuals who were bolder than their peers and had specifically trained for this procedure, gaining recognition as skilled lithotomists. Patients traveled long distances to be operated on by them, and some of the older surgeons, like William Cheselden, performed many procedures with outstanding results. The operation involved making an incision from the perineum, typically referred to as lateral lithotomy. It was well-designed and produced good outcomes, especially in children. However, this method is now outdated, having mostly been replaced by the high or supra-pubic operation. In the high operation, after the patient is properly prepared, they are positioned on their back, and the bladder is flushed with hot boracic lotion. Once the lotion returns clear, a final injection is administered until the bladder is felt rising above the pubes. The rubber tube is then taken off from the silver catheter used for the injection, and the end of the catheter is sealed with a spigot. An incision is then made along the midline of the abdomen in the bladder area. This incision needs to be as low as possible so that the bladder can be accessed below the peritoneum, which encloses it with an outer, serous layer higher up. As one gets closer to the bladder, several veins obstruct the way, some of which will have to be cut. The bladder wall is identified by its rough network of pale muscle fibers, and a strong suture is passed through on each side of the midline so that when the bladder is opened and the lotion flows out, the opening into the bladder does not sink too deep into the pelvis. A finger inserted into the bladder can determine the size and location of the stone or stones, which are then removed using specialized forceps. Once the bleeding has stopped, the bladder wound is partially or completely closed with sutures and allowed to settle into the pelvis after the catheter has been taken out. It’s advisable to leave a drainage tube in the abdominal incision for a while, so if urine leaks from the bladder wound, it can easily escape to the dressings.
Litholapaxy.—Lithotrity consists of two parts—the crushing of the stone, and the removal of the detritus. The two stages are now carried out at one “sitting,” without an interval being allowed between them, as was formerly the practice, and the term “litholapaxy” designates this method. The patient having been anaesthetized, 10 oz. of hot boracic lotion are injected, and the crushing instrument, the lithotrite, is then passed into the bladder. The lithotrite has two blades, a “male” and a “female,” the latter fenestrated, the former solid with its surface notched. When the stone is fixed between the blades the screw is used, and great pressure is applied evenly, gradually and continuously to the stone. The lithotrite is made of very tough steel, so that hard stones may be crushed without danger of the instrument breaking or bending. Care must be taken not to catch the bladder-wall with the lithotrite. This danger is avoided by raising the point of the lithotrite immediately after grasping the stone and before crushing. The stone breaks into two or more pieces, and these fragments must be crushed, one by one, until they are powdered fine enough to escape by the large evacuating catheter. If the stone be large and hard, half an hour or longer may be required to crush it sufficiently fine. When the surgeon fails to catch any more large pieces, the presumption is that the stone has been thoroughly broken up. The lithotrite is then withdrawn and the detritus is washed out by an “aspirator,” which consists of a stiff elastic ball which is connected with a trap, into which fragments of stone fall so as not to pass out on the instrument being used at later periods in the operation. A large catheter, with the eye very near the end of the short curve, is passed into the bladder; the aspirator, full of boracic lotion, is attached to the catheter, and a few ounces of the fluid are expressed from the aspirator into the bladder by squeezing the rubber ball. When the pressure is taken off the ball, it dilates and draws the fluid out of the bladder, and with it some of the detritus, which falls into the trap. This is repeated until all the fragments have been removed. After the operation the patient sometimes suffers from discomfort. His urine should be drawn off by a soft catheter at regular intervals for a few days. If the pain be severe, it can generally be relieved by fomentations. The patient must be kept in bed after the operation, and in cases where the stone has been large and the bladder irritable, the surgeon should insist on his remaining there for at least a week; in those cases which go on favourably the patients are soon able to perform their ordinary duties. Fatal terminations, however, do now and again occur from suppression of urine, the result of the old-standing kidney disease which so often complicates these cases.
Litholapaxy.—Lithotripsy has two main steps: breaking the stone and removing the debris. These two stages are now done in one session without any breaks in between, which is what "litholapaxy" refers to. After the patient is given anesthesia, 10 ounces of hot boracic lotion are injected, and the crushing tool, the lithotrite, is inserted into the bladder. The lithotrite has two blades, a "male" and a "female," with the female being fenestrated and the male being solid with notched surfaces. When the stone is held between the blades, a screw is turned to apply even, gradual, and continuous pressure to crush the stone. The lithotrite is made of very tough steel, allowing it to break hard stones without breaking or bending. Care must be taken not to snag the bladder wall with the lithotrite, which can be avoided by lifting the point of the lithotrite after grasping the stone, but before crushing. The stone breaks into two or more pieces, which must each be crushed until they are small enough to pass through the large evacuating catheter. If the stone is large and tough, it may take half an hour or more to crush it finely enough. Once no more large pieces are caught, it is assumed that the stone is thoroughly broken up. The lithotrite is then removed, and the debris is washed out using an “aspirator,” consisting of a stiff elastic ball connected to a trap that catches stone fragments, preventing them from coming out during later stages of the procedure. A large catheter, with the opening very near the end of its short curve, is inserted into the bladder; the aspirator, filled with boracic lotion, is attached to the catheter, and a few ounces of the liquid are pushed into the bladder by squeezing the rubber ball. When the pressure on the ball is released, it expands and pulls the fluid out of the bladder along with some debris, which drops into the trap. This process is repeated until all fragments are cleared out. After the procedure, the patient may experience some discomfort. Their urine should be drained using a soft catheter at regular intervals for a few days. If there is severe pain, it can generally be eased with warm compresses. The patient needs to stay in bed after the operation, and if the stone was large and the bladder is irritable, the surgeon should require them to remain in bed for at least a week; however, in favorable cases, patients can soon return to their normal activities. Fatal outcomes can occasionally occur due to urine retention from chronic kidney disease, which often complicates these cases.
To Brigade-Surgeon Lieutenant-Colonel Dennis Francis Keegan, of the Indian Medical Service, is due the fact that the operation of crushing and promptly removing all fragments of a vesical calculus is as well suited for boys as for men. In entire opposition to long-standing European prejudices, Keegan’s operation is now firmly and permanently established. The old operation (Cheselden’s) of cutting a stone out through the bottom of a boy’s bladder is now seldom resorted to, and if a stone in a boy is found too large or too hard to lend itself to the crushing operation, it is removed by a vertical incision through the lower part of the anterior wall of the abdomen, as described above. For a successful performance of the crushing operation in a boy a small lithotrite has, of course, to be used, and it must be of the very best English make. The operation has to be done with the utmost gentleness and thoroughness, not a particle of the crushed stone being left in the bladder, since otherwise the piece left becomes the nucleus of a fresh stone and the trouble recurs.
To Brigade-Surgeon Lieutenant-Colonel Dennis Francis Keegan, of the Indian Medical Service, we owe the fact that the procedure for crushing and quickly removing all fragments of a bladder stone works well for boys just as it does for men. Contrary to long-held European biases, Keegan’s method is now well-established and permanent. The old method (Cheselden’s) of removing a stone through the bottom of a boy’s bladder is rarely used now, and if a stone in a boy is too large or too hard for the crushing method, it is removed through a vertical incision in the lower part of the front wall of the abdomen, as mentioned above. To successfully perform the crushing procedure on a boy, a small lithotrite must be used, and it needs to be of the highest quality from England. The operation must be carried out with great care and thoroughness, ensuring that not a single particle of the crushed stone remains in the bladder, as any remaining piece can lead to the formation of a new stone and cause the problem to return.
The treatment of vesical calculi by other means than operative surgery is of little value. Attempts have been made to dissolve them by internal remedies, or by the injection of chemical agents into the bladder; but, although such methods have for a time been apparently successful, they have invariably been found worthless for removing calculi once actually formed. Nevertheless, much can be done towards preventing the formation of calculi in those who have a tendency to their formation, by attention to diet, by taking proper exercise, and by the internal administration of drugs.
The treatment of bladder stones using methods other than surgery is generally ineffective. There have been attempts to dissolve them with medications or by injecting chemicals into the bladder; however, while these methods may seem successful for a while, they have consistently proven useless for eliminating stones that have already formed. Still, a lot can be done to prevent the formation of stones in people who are prone to them, through dietary management, regular exercise, and the use of medications.
Rupture of the bladder may be caused by a kick or blow over the upper part of the abdomen, or by a wheel passing over it; or it may be a complication of fracture of the pelvis. If the rupture is in that part of the bladder which is uncovered by the peritoneum, the extravasated urine may be cut down upon and let out with good prospect of success; but if the rupture is in the upper or hinder part of the bladder the urine is let loose into the general peritoneal cavity and sets up peritonitis, which is more than likely to prove fatal. If the surgeon knows that the bladder is ruptured he should operate at once in order to provide escape for the urine, and also to sew up the rent. If the possibility of the bladder being ruptured be even suspected, the surgeon should pass a catheter. Perhaps he draws off an ounce or two of blood-stained urine. This makes him doubly suspicious, so he injects into the bladder five, eight or ten ounces of warm boracic lotion, and, leaving it there for a few minutes, he measures the amount which he is able afterwards to withdraw; if he finds that a certain amount is lost he is assured that a leakage has taken place and he at once proceeds to operate. If only the diagnosis is made promptly, and the operation is at once undertaken, the outlook is not unfavourable. A generation or so back nearly all the cases of rupture of bladder ended fatally.
Rupture of the bladder can happen due to a kick or blow to the upper abdomen, or from a wheel running over it; it can also occur as a complication of a pelvic fracture. If the rupture is in the part of the bladder that isn’t covered by the peritoneum, the leaked urine can be accessed and drained with a good chance of success. However, if the rupture is in the upper or back part of the bladder, the urine spills into the general peritoneal cavity and causes peritonitis, which is likely to be fatal. If the surgeon confirms a bladder rupture, they should operate immediately to allow the urine to escape and to stitch up the tear. If there’s even a suspicion that the bladder might be ruptured, the surgeon should insert a catheter. They might draw off an ounce or two of blood-stained urine, which raises their suspicion further. They then inject five, eight, or ten ounces of warm boracic lotion into the bladder and leave it there for a few minutes, measuring how much they can withdraw afterward. If they find a significant amount is missing, they are confident that there’s a leak, and they proceed with the operation. If the diagnosis is made quickly and the surgery is done right away, the outlook isn’t bad. About a generation ago, nearly all cases of bladder rupture ended in death.
Villous disease of the bladder is innocent; that is to say, it does not spread to the neighbouring structures or implicate the lymphatic glands. The villi are slender, branched, filamentous processes which, springing from the floor of the bladder, float in the urine like seaweed. They are freely supplied with blood-vessels, so that when a piece of a villus is broken off there is likely to be blood in the urine. Indeed, painless haemorrhage is one of the characteristic features of the disease, and when fragments of the “seaweed” are found in the urine the diagnosis is clear. If the bladder is opened from the front, as already described, the villi may be nipped off by special forceps and the disease permanently cured.
Villous disease of the bladder is benign; that is, it doesn't spread to nearby structures or affect the lymph nodes. The villi are thin, branched, thread-like projections that emerge from the bladder floor, floating in the urine like seaweed. They have a rich blood supply, so if a piece of a villus breaks off, blood may appear in the urine. In fact, painless bleeding is one of the key features of the disease, and when pieces of the “seaweed” are seen in the urine, the diagnosis is evident. If the bladder is accessed from the front, as described earlier, the villi can be trimmed off with special forceps, allowing for a permanent cure of the disease.
Malignant disease of the bladder is almost always the warty form of cancer known as epithelioma. It springs as a sessile growth from the mucous membrane of the floor near the opening of one of the ureters, and, worrying the sensory nerves, causes irritability of the bladder and incontinence of urine. In due course septic germs reach the bladder, either from the urethra, the bowel, the kidneys or the blood-stream, and cystitis sets in. When ulceration has taken place, blood occurs in the urine, and the patient—generally beyond middle age—suffers dull or lancinating pains. Eventually the rectum may also be involved and the distress becomes extreme. The presence of the growth may be determined by sounding the bladder, by the cystoscope, and by the finger in the rectum. If the growth invades the outlet, retention of urine may occur, and the surgeon may be compelled to open the bladder from the front of the abdomen. In cases where operation is out of the question, washing the bladder with hot boracic lotion may give great relief. The treatment of cancer of the bladder by operation is, as a rule, unsatisfactory, because of the close proximity of the growth to the ureters and to the rectum. If, however, the disease were recognized early and had not invaded the neighbouring structures, and if it were upon the upper or the anterior part of the bladder, its removal might be hopefully undertaken.
Malignant disease of the bladder is almost always a warty type of cancer known as epithelioma. It starts as a growth from the mucous membrane at the bottom near the opening of one of the ureters, and by irritating the sensory nerves, it causes bladder irritability and urine incontinence. Eventually, septic germs reach the bladder, either from the urethra, the bowel, the kidneys, or the bloodstream, leading to cystitis. When ulceration occurs, blood appears in the urine, and the patient—usually older than middle age—experiences dull or sharp pains. Eventually, the rectum may also be affected, leading to severe distress. The presence of the growth can be detected by feeling the bladder, using a cystoscope, or through a rectal exam. If the growth blocks the outlet, urine retention may happen, and the surgeon may need to create an opening to the bladder through the front of the abdomen. In cases where surgery is not an option, flushing the bladder with hot boric acid solution may provide significant relief. Surgical treatment for bladder cancer is generally unsatisfactory due to the close proximity of the growth to the ureters and rectum. However, if the disease is detected early, hasn’t spread to nearby structures, and is located on the upper or front part of the bladder, its removal might be possible with some hope for success.
Hypertrophy and Dilatation.—When there is long-continued obstruction to the flow of urine, as in stricture of the urethra, or enlargement of the prostate, the bladder-wall becomes much thickened, the muscular fibres increasing both in size and number; the condition is known as “hypertrophy.” Hypertrophy may be accompanied by dilatation of the bladder, a condition which the bladder may assume when the voiding of its contents is interfered with for a length of time.
Hypertrophy and Dilatation.—When there's a prolonged blockage in urine flow, like in cases of urethral stricture or prostate enlargement, the bladder wall becomes significantly thicker, with both the size and number of muscle fibers increasing; this condition is called “hypertrophy.” Hypertrophy can also be associated with bladder dilatation, which occurs when the bladder is unable to empty its contents for an extended period.
Paralysis of the bladder is a want of contractile power in the muscular fibres of the bladder-wall. It may result from injuries whereby the spinal cord is lacerated or pressed upon, so that the micturition centre, which is situated in the lumbar region, is thrown out of working order. The result may be either retention or incontinence of urine; sometimes there is at first retention, which later is followed by incontinence. Paralysis is also met with in certain nervous diseases, as in locomotor ataxia, and in various cerebral lesions, as in apoplexy.
Bladder paralysis is the inability of the bladder's muscle fibers to contract. This can happen due to injuries that damage or compress the spinal cord, disrupting the micturition center located in the lumbar area. The outcome can be either urine retention or incontinence; sometimes, urine retention occurs first, followed by incontinence later. Paralysis can also occur in certain neurological conditions, like locomotor ataxia, and in various brain injuries, such as strokes.
Atony of the bladder is a paresis or partial paralysis. It is due to a want of tone in the muscular fibres, and is frequently the result of over-distension of the bladder, such as may occur in cases of enlargement of the prostate. The patient is unable to empty the bladder, and the condition of atony gets increasingly worse.
Atony of the bladder is a type of partial paralysis. It happens because the muscle fibers lack proper tone and is often caused by overstretching of the bladder, which can occur in cases of prostate enlargement. The patient cannot fully empty the bladder, and the atony condition continues to worsen.
In both paralysis and atony the indication is carefully to prevent over-distension by the urine being retained too long, and at the same time to treat by appropriate means the cause which has produced or is keeping up the condition.
In both paralysis and atony, the goal is to avoid over-distension caused by urine being held too long, while also addressing the underlying cause that has created or is maintaining the condition.
Incontinence of urine may occur in the adult or in the child, but is due to widely different causes in the two cases. In the child it may be simply a bad habit, the child not having been properly trained; but more frequently there is a want of control in the micturition-centre, so that the child passes its water unwittingly, especially during the night. In adults it is not so much a condition of incontinence in the sense of water being passed against the will, but is a suggestion that the bladder is already full, the water which passes being the overflow from a too full reservoir. It is usually caused by an obstruction external to the bladder, e.g. enlarged prostate or stricture of the urethra; a calculus may produce the condition. In the child an attempt must be made to improve the tone of the micturition-centre by the use of belladonna or strychnine internally, and of a blister or faradism externally over the lumbar region, and every effort should be made to train the child to pass water at stated times and regular intervals. In the adult the cause which produces the over-distension must be removed if possible; but, as a rule, the patient has to be provided with a catheter, which he can pass before the bladder has filled to overflowing. A soft flexible catheter should be given in preference to a rigid or semi-rigid one. The best form is the red-rubber catheter, and he should be taught the need of keeping it absolutely clean. In the case of children incontinence of urine means irritability; in adults it means overflow.
Urine incontinence can happen in both adults and children, but the causes are quite different. In children, it may simply be a bad habit due to insufficient training; more often, it involves a lack of control in the micturition center, causing the child to urinate unintentionally, especially at night. In adults, it's not as much about passing urine against one's will, but rather a sign that the bladder is already full, with the urine that leaks being the overflow from an excessively full bladder. This is usually caused by an external blockage to the bladder, like an enlarged prostate or urethral stricture; a stone can also cause this issue. For children, efforts should be made to improve the tone of the micturition center using belladonna or strychnine internally, and applying a blister or faradism externally on the lower back. Parents should also try to train the child to urinate at scheduled times. For adults, the underlying cause of the over-distension should be addressed if possible; however, patients typically need to use a catheter that they can insert before the bladder fills completely. A soft, flexible catheter is preferable to a rigid one. The red-rubber catheter is the best option, and patients should be educated on the importance of keeping it very clean. In children, urine incontinence indicates irritability; in adults, it signifies overflow.
The condition termed by Sir James Paget stammering micturition is analogous to speech stammering, and occurs in those who are nervous and easily put out. It would seem to be due to the sphincter of the bladder not relaxing synchronously with the contraction of the detrusor, and is sometimes caused by external irritation, such as preputial adhesions. Occasionally not a drop of urine can be passed, or a little passes and then a sudden stoppage occurs; the more the patient strains the worse he becomes, until at last there is complete retention of urine. The trouble can sometimes be cured by the removal of irritating causes, and in these cases, as well as in those in which no such cause can be discovered, care should be taken to avoid those difficulties which have given rise to the patient’s worst failures. If at any time he should fail to perform the act of micturition, he ought not to strain, but should quietly wait for a little before making any further effort. Regularity in the times of making water is also of much importance.
The condition known as stammering micturition by Sir James Paget is similar to speech stammering and occurs in those who are nervous and easily disturbed. It seems to happen because the bladder sphincter doesn’t relax at the same time as the detrusor muscle contracts and can sometimes be triggered by external irritation, like preputial adhesions. Sometimes, a person can’t pass any urine at all, or they might manage to pass a little, but then there’s a sudden stop; the more they strain, the worse it gets, until there’s total retention of urine. This issue can often be resolved by removing the irritating causes, and in these cases, as well as those where no clear cause can be identified, it’s important to avoid situations that have led to the patient’s worst experiences. If at any time they struggle to urinate, they shouldn’t strain but should calmly wait a bit before trying again. Maintaining a regular schedule for urination is also very important.
Retention of urine may occur in paralysis of the bladder, or in conditions where the patient is suffering from an illness which blunts the nervous sensibility, such as apoplexy, concussion of the brain, or typhoid fever. It is, however, more commonly due to obstruction anterior to the bladder, as in stricture of the urethra or enlargement of the prostate. The distended bladder can be felt as a rounded swelling above the pubes, and perhaps reaching to the level of the navel. Percussion over it gives a dull note. When the bladder is distended, it is necessary to evacuate it as soon as possible. If there is no obstruction to the flow of urine, the retention being due to atony or paralysis, a soft catheter is passed and the water drawn off. But when there is an obstruction which cannot be overcome, aspiration has to be resorted to, the needle of the aspirator being pushed through the abdominal wall into the bladder. The point of puncture in the abdominal wall is in the middle line a few inches above the symphysis pubis. The bladder may be emptied in this way very many times in the same person with only good result.
Holding urine can happen when the bladder is paralyzed or when a person is dealing with an illness that dulls their nervous sensitivity, like stroke, brain injury, or typhoid fever. However, it's more often caused by a blockage in front of the bladder, such as urethral stricture or enlarged prostate. A swollen bladder can be felt as a rounded bulge above the pubic bone, possibly reaching up to the level of the belly button. Tapping on it produces a dull sound. When the bladder is full, it’s important to empty it as quickly as possible. If there’s no blockage preventing urine flow and the retention is due to weak bladder muscles or paralysis, a soft catheter is used to drain the urine. But if there’s a blockage that can’t be cleared, aspiration is needed, where a needle from an aspirator is inserted through the abdominal wall into the bladder. The needle goes into the abdominal wall in the middle line, a few inches above the pubic bone. This method can be used multiple times on the same person with positive outcomes.
Diseases of Prostate Gland.
Prostate Gland Diseases.
The prostate gland may become acutely inflamed as the result of the backward extension of gonorrhoeal inflammation of the urethra; it may also be attacked by the germs of ordinary suppuration as well as by the bacilli of tuberculosis. A sudden enlargement of a large gland lying against the outlets of the bladder and the bowel renders micturition difficult, painful or impossible, and interferes with defaecation. Pressure of the seat of the chair upon the perineum also causes distress, so the man sits sideways and on the edge of the seat. If abscess forms, it should be incised from the perineum; if allowed to run its course it may burst into the bladder, the urethra or the rectum, and set up serious complication. The treatment of prostatitis (inflammation of the prostate) consists in rest in bed, sitz-baths and fomentations. If retention of urine takes place a soft catheter must be passed. In the early stage of an acute attack a dozen leeches upon the perineum may do good. The bowels must be kept freely open, and from time to time, as the pain demands, a morphia suppository may be introduced into the bowel.
The prostate gland can become acutely inflamed due to the backward spread of gonorrheal infection from the urethra. It can also be affected by bacteria that cause regular pus formation and by tuberculosis bacteria. A sudden enlargement of the large gland next to the openings of the bladder and bowel makes urination difficult, painful, or impossible, and also affects bowel movements. Sitting in a chair puts pressure on the perineum, causing discomfort, so the man sits sideways on the edge of the seat. If an abscess develops, it should be drained from the perineum; if left untreated, it could burst into the bladder, urethra, or rectum, leading to serious complications. Treatment for prostatitis (inflammation of the prostate) involves bed rest, sitz baths, and warm compresses. If there is urine retention, a soft catheter must be inserted. During the early stage of an acute attack, placing a dozen leeches on the perineum may be beneficial. The bowels should be kept moving regularly, and when needed, a morphine suppository can be used to relieve pain.
Chronic prostatitis is a legacy from a recent or long-past attack of gonorrhoea. The enlargement gives rise to a feeling of weight and fulness in the perineum, irritability of the bladder, and a gleety urethral discharge. Manual examination reveals the presence of a large, hard mass in front of the bladder, and in the mass there can often be felt softish or tender areas which seem to threaten abscess. On urine being passed into a glass, a cloudiness is seen, and material like pieces of vermicelli or broken threads may be noticed. These are the castings from the long tubular glands, and are characteristic of chronic inflammation of the prostate. The occasional passage of a large metal bougie, the use of weak lotions of nitrate of silver, the administration of quinine and iron, and the application of blisters to the perineum, may be tried as circumstances direct. The patient should lead a quiet life, free from sexual excitement. Horse-exercise, cycle-riding, rough games and alcohol should be avoided.
Chronic prostatitis is a leftover from a recent or long-ago case of gonorrhea. The swelling causes a feeling of heaviness and fullness in the perineum, bladder irritation, and a discharge from the urethra. A manual examination detects a large, hard mass in front of the bladder, and within that mass, there are often soft or tender spots that could lead to an abscess. When urine is collected in a glass, it appears cloudy, and you might notice something resembling pieces of vermicelli or broken threads. These are castings from the long tubular glands and are typical of chronic inflammation of the prostate. Occasionally passing a large metal bougie, using weak solutions of silver nitrate, taking quinine and iron, and applying blisters to the perineum may be attempted based on the situation. The patient should maintain a calm lifestyle, avoiding sexual excitement. Activities like horseback riding, cycling, rough sports, and alcohol should be kept to a minimum.
Enlargement of the prostate exists in a considerable proportion of men of about sixty years of age and onward. It consists of an uncontrolled growth of the normal muscular and glandular tissue of the prostate, interfering with, or absolutely stopping, the outflow of the urine. Gently pushing the bladder upwards and backwards, it increases the length of the urethra, so that in order to draw off retained urine the catheter must be longer than ordinary, but inasmuch as there is no actual narrowing of the passage it may be of full calibre. The beak should be well turned up so that it may ride in front of, and surmount, the median enlargement. Because of the thick, ring-like mass of new tissue around the outlet of the bladder, there is difficulty in micturition, and because the muscular bladder wall is now unable to contract upon all its contents a certain amount of urine is retained. As the enlarged prostate bulges up in the floor of the bladder, a pouch or hollow forms behind it, from which the muscular wall is unable to dislodge the stagnant urine. This keeps up constant irritation, and if by chance the germs of decomposition find their way thither, cystitis sets in and the patient’s condition becomes serious, not only because of the risk to which his tired and irritated kidneys are submitted, but because of the possibility of a phosphatic stone being formed in the bladder. The seriousness of enlargement of the prostate does not depend upon the size of the growth so much as upon the inability of the patient to empty his bladder completely.
Prostate enlargement affects a significant number of men around sixty years old and older. It involves uncontrolled growth of the normal muscle and gland tissue of the prostate, which disrupts or completely blocks the flow of urine. This condition pushes the bladder upward and backward, lengthening the urethra, so a longer catheter is needed to drain the retained urine. However, since there’s no actual narrowing of the passage, it can be of standard width. The tip of the catheter should be angled well upward so it can navigate over the middle enlargement. Due to the thick, ring-like mass of new tissue around the bladder outlet, urination becomes difficult, and because the muscular bladder wall can't contract fully, some urine is left behind. As the enlarged prostate bulges into the bladder floor, a pouch or cavity forms behind it, trapping stagnant urine that the muscular wall can’t push out. This causes ongoing irritation, and if bacteria happen to enter that area, cystitis can develop, making the patient’s condition serious—not only because of the strain on their tired and irritated kidneys but also due to the risk of a phosphatic stone forming in the bladder. The severity of prostate enlargement isn't so much about how big it is, but rather how much the patient struggles to empty their bladder completely.
The surgeon forms his estimate of the size of the prostate by rectal examination. But sometimes a patient has retention of urine from 31 enlarged prostate, when by this method of manual examination the amount of increase appears quite unimportant. The explanation is that the enlargement is chiefly confined to a small piece of the gland which protrudes like a tongue into the water-way. Robert McGill of Leeds was the first surgeon to remove by a supra-pubic operation this tongue-like process of new prostatic growth. Attempts had sometimes been made to get rid of it by instrumentation through the urethra, but they had not met with much success.
The surgeon determines the size of the prostate through a rectal exam. However, sometimes a patient experiences urinary retention due to an enlarged prostate, and this manual examination may not reveal any significant increase. The reason is that the enlargement is mainly limited to a small section of the gland that sticks out like a tongue into the urinary tract. Robert McGill from Leeds was the first surgeon to successfully remove this tongue-like growth through a supra-pubic procedure. There have been attempts to eliminate it through instruments inserted into the urethra, but those efforts haven’t been very successful.
When the surgeon has made out the existence of an enlargement of the prostate, the next thing is to find to what extent this interferes with the bladder being emptied. To do this, he asks the patient to pass as much water as he is able, and then with due precautions introduces a soft catheter and measures the amount of urine which he thus draws off—half an ounce, an ounce, two ounces, however much it may be. It is this “residual urine” which causes the annoyance and the danger of enlarged prostate, and unless arrangements can be made for its regular withdrawal serious trouble is almost certain to ensue. The passing of a large catheter may have the effect of so opening up the water-way that, at any rate for a time, the irritability of the bladder may cease, in which case the patient may be instructed in the art of passing a catheter for himself. Or the surgeon may find that in addition to the regular passing of a large catheter an occasional washing-out of the bladder with hot boracic lotion is all that is needed in the way of active treatment. At the same time, however, the patient is placed upon a plain and wholesome diet with little or no alcohol, and he is instructed to lead in every respect a regular and quiet life. To many men with enlarged prostate the passing of an instrument night and morning is no great hardship, while to others the idea of leading what is called a “catheter life” appears intolerable, or, having for a time been patiently carried out, is found not only severely trying but greatly disappointing.
When the surgeon identifies an enlarged prostate, the next step is to determine how much it affects the bladder's ability to empty. To do this, he asks the patient to urinate as much as possible, then carefully inserts a soft catheter to measure the amount of urine he can extract—whether that's half an ounce, an ounce, two ounces, or whatever amount it is. This "residual urine" is what causes the discomfort and risks associated with an enlarged prostate, and if arrangements aren't made for its regular removal, serious problems are likely to arise. Using a large catheter can sometimes open up the urinary tract enough that, at least temporarily, bladder irritability eases, allowing the patient to learn how to self-catheterize. Alternatively, the surgeon may decide that in addition to regular catheterization, occasional bladder washouts with hot boracic lotion are sufficient for treatment. Simultaneously, the patient is advised to follow a simple, healthy diet with little or no alcohol and to live a calm, regular life. For many men with an enlarged prostate, using a catheter morning and night is manageable, but for others, the idea of living a "catheter life" seems unbearable, or after trying it for a while, it becomes not just challenging but also quite frustrating.
In some people the very first passing of a catheter sets up a local and constitutional disturbance, the bladder being rendered irritable and intolerant, the temperature going up, and shiverings and perspirations manifesting themselves. This condition was formerly called “catheter fever,” and was looked upon as something mysterious and peculiar. It is now generally understood to be the result of septic inoculation of the interior of the bladder.
In some people, the first time a catheter is inserted can cause local and overall discomfort, making the bladder sensitive and intolerant, leading to a rise in temperature, along with chills and sweating. This condition used to be referred to as “catheter fever” and was considered mysterious and unusual. It’s now commonly understood to be caused by the introduction of bacteria into the bladder.
Lastly, in other persons the passing of the catheter is attended with so much difficulty, distress or bleeding, that something more helpful and effectual is urgently called for.
Lastly, in some individuals, using the catheter is so difficult, distressing, or causes significant bleeding that something more helpful and effective is urgently needed.
Operative Treatment.—It has long been known that large tumours of the uterus sometimes dwindle if the ovaries are removed by operation, and Professor William White of Philadelphia thought that prostatic growths might be similarly influenced by the removal of the testicles. Beyond question considerable improvement has followed this operation in cases of enlargement of the prostate, especially where the enlargement seemed to be general, soft and vascular. A similar though perhaps a slower effect is produced when the duct of the testis, the vas deferens, is divided on each side of the body. If there is no great urgency about the case this treatment may well be tried, the bladder being all the while duly emptied by catheter and washed by irrigation. But if the case is urgent, there being difficulty or bleeding with the passing of the catheter, the bladder being excessively irritable and the urine foul, a more radical measure is needed. The best operation is that upon the lines laid down by Robert McGill, who opened the bladder through the anterior abdominal wall and removed that part of the prostate gland which was blocking the water-way. McGill’s operation was improved upon by Eugene Fuller of New York, who, in 1895, published a full account of his procedure.1 Having opened the bladder from the front (as in supra-pubic lithotomy), he introduced his left index finger into the rectum and thrust the prostate gland towards the right index finger, which was then in the bladder. With the nail of that finger, or with the end of a pair of scissors, he made a rent in the mucous membrane of the bladder and the capsule of the gland, and then shelled out the mass of new tissue which had caused the prostatic enlargement. This operation is called “prostatectomy,” which means the removal of the prostate gland. The prostate gland, however, is not removed, but only a muscular and glandular mass (adenoma), which, growing within the prostatic capsule, encircles the urethra and squeezes the original gland tissue out of existence. Following on the lines of McGill and Fuller, P.J. Freyer has done excellent work in England towards placing this operation upon a sound basis.
Operative Treatment.—It has been known for a long time that large tumors of the uterus sometimes shrink when the ovaries are surgically removed, and Professor William White of Philadelphia believed that prostatic growths might also be affected by removing the testicles. There’s no doubt that significant improvement has followed this operation in cases of prostate enlargement, especially where the enlargement appeared to be general, soft, and vascular. A similar, though likely slower, effect occurs when the duct of the testis, the vas deferens, is cut on both sides. If the case isn’t urgent, this treatment can be worthwhile, while the bladder is regularly emptied with a catheter and cleaned with irrigation. However, if the situation is urgent, with difficulties or bleeding during catheterization, excessive bladder irritation, and foul urine, a more drastic approach is necessary. The best procedure is based on the methods outlined by Robert McGill, who opened the bladder through the front of the abdomen and removed the portion of the prostate gland blocking the urinary passage. McGill’s operation was refined by Eugene Fuller of New York, who provided a detailed account of his technique in 1895. After opening the bladder from the front (as done in supra-pubic lithotomy), he inserted his left index finger into the rectum and pushed the prostate gland toward his right index finger, which was in the bladder. Using the nail of that finger or the tip of scissors, he cut through the mucous membrane of the bladder and the capsule of the gland, then extracted the mass of new tissue that caused the prostatic enlargement. This procedure is called “prostatectomy,” which means removing the prostate gland. However, it’s not the entire gland that’s removed but only a muscular and glandular mass (adenoma) that grows within the prostatic capsule, wrapping around the urethra and pushing the original gland tissue aside. Following the approaches of McGill and Fuller, P.J. Freyer has made significant contributions in England to establish this operation on a solid foundation.
Subsequently to the operation the bladder enjoys complete and needful rest, and the kidneys, which previously were in a condition of perpetual disturbance, improve in working power. The wound in the bladder and in the abdominal wall gradually closes; the function of the bladder returns, and the patient is soon able to go back to his usual occupation in greatly improved health and vigour. The operation is, necessarily, a serious one, and the age of the patient, the condition of his bladder, of his kidneys, and of his blood-vessels, require to be taken into consideration; still, the operation gives an excellent account of itself in statistics, and if a practical surgeon advises a patient to accept its risks his counsel may well be followed.
After the operation, the bladder gets complete and necessary rest, and the kidneys, which were previously always disturbed, start to function better. The wounds in the bladder and abdominal wall heal gradually; the bladder's function returns, and the patient can soon return to their usual activities with significantly improved health and energy. The operation is understandably serious, and factors like the patient's age, bladder condition, kidney function, and blood vessel health need to be considered. However, the operation shows excellent results in statistics, and if a skilled surgeon advises a patient to accept the associated risks, that advice should be taken seriously.
Malignant disease of the prostate is distinguished from senile glandular enlargement by the rapidity of its growth, by the freeness of the bleeding which is associated with the introduction of a catheter, and by the marked wasting which the individual undergoes. Unfortunately, by the time that the cancerous nature of the disease is definitely recognized, the prospect of relief being afforded by operation is small.
Prostate cancer is different from benign enlargement of the prostate mainly because it grows quickly, there's significant bleeding when a catheter is inserted, and the person experiences noticeable weight loss. Unfortunately, by the time the cancer is clearly identified, the chance of finding relief through surgery is low.
BLADDER-WORT, the name given to a submerged water plant, Utricularia vulgaris, with finely divided leaves upon which are borne small bladders provided with trap-door entrances which open only inwards. Small crustaceans and other aquatic animals push their way into the bladders and are unable to escape. The products of the decay of the organisms thus captured are absorbed into the plant by star-shaped hairs which line the interior of the bladder. In this way the plant is supplied with nitrogenous food from the animal kingdom. Bladder-wort bears small, yellow, two-lipped flowers on a stem which rises above the surface of the water. It is found in pools and ditches in the British Isles, and is widely distributed in the north temperate zone. The genus contains about two hundred species in tropical and temperate regions.
BLADDERWORT, is the name for a submerged water plant, Utricularia vulgaris, which has finely divided leaves with small bladders that have trap-door entrances that open only inward. Small crustaceans and other aquatic animals enter the bladders and cannot escape. The decaying remains of these organisms are absorbed by the plant through star-shaped hairs lining the inside of the bladder. This process provides the plant with nitrogen-rich nutrients from the animal kingdom. Bladder-wort produces small, yellow, two-lipped flowers on a stem that rises above the water's surface. It can be found in pools and ditches throughout the British Isles and is widely distributed in the northern temperate zone. The genus includes about two hundred species in tropical and temperate regions.
![]() |
A, Bladder of Utricularia neglecta (after Darwin), enlarged. B, stellate hairs from interior of bladder of U. vulgaris. |
BLADES, WILLIAM (1824-1890), English printer and bibliographer, was born at Clapham, London, on the 5th of December 1824. In 1840 he was apprenticed to his father’s printing business in London, being subsequently taken into partnership. The firm was afterwards known as Blades, East & Blades. His interest in printing led him to make a study of the volumes produced by Caxton’s press, and of the early history of printing in England. His Life and Typography of William Caxton, England’s First Printer, was published in 1861-1863, and the conclusions which he set forth were arrived at by a careful examination of types in the early books, each class of type being traced from its first use to the time when, spoilt by wear, it passed out of Caxton’s hands. Some 450 volumes from the Caxton Press were thus carefully compared and classified in chronological order. In 1877 Blades took an active part in organizing the Caxton celebration, and strongly supported the foundation of the Library Association. He was a keen collector of old books, prints and medals. His publications relate chiefly to the early history of printing, the Enemies of Books, his most popular work, being produced in 1881. He died at Sutton in Surrey on the 27th of April 1890.
BLADES, WILLIAM (1824-1890), English printer and bibliographer, was born in Clapham, London, on December 5, 1824. In 1840, he began an apprenticeship at his father’s printing business in London and later became a partner. The firm was subsequently known as Blades, East & Blades. His interest in printing led him to study the volumes produced by Caxton’s press and the early history of printing in England. His Life and Typography of William Caxton, England’s First Printer was published from 1861 to 1863, and the conclusions he presented were based on a careful examination of the types used in early books, tracking each type from its first use until it wore out and was no longer used by Caxton. About 450 volumes from the Caxton Press were carefully compared and classified in chronological order. In 1877, Blades played an active role in organizing the Caxton celebration and was a strong supporter of establishing the Library Association. He was also a passionate collector of old books, prints, and medals. His publications mainly focus on the early history of printing, with Enemies of Books, his most popular work, published in 1881. He passed away in Sutton, Surrey, on April 27, 1890.
BLAENAVON, or Blaenafon, an urban district in the northern parliamentary division of Monmouthshire, England, 15 m. N. by W. of Newport, on the Great Western, London & North Western and Rhymney railways. Pop. (1901) 10,869. It lies in the uppermost part of the Afon Lwyd valley, at an elevation exceeding 1000 ft., in a wild and mountainous district, on the eastern 32 edge of the great coal and iron mining region of Glamorganshire and Monmouthshire. There are very extensive iron and steel works, with blast furnaces and rolling mills in the district, which employ the large industrial population.
Blaenavon, or Blaenafon, is an urban area in the northern parliamentary division of Monmouthshire, England, 15 miles north-west of Newport, situated on the Great Western, London & North Western, and Rhymney railways. The population in 1901 was 10,869. It’s located in the highest part of the Afon Lwyd valley at an elevation over 1,000 feet, in a rugged and mountainous area on the eastern edge of the major coal and iron mining region of Glamorganshire and Monmouthshire. The district features extensive iron and steel production facilities, including blast furnaces and rolling mills, which provide jobs for a large industrial workforce.
BLAGOVYESHCHENSK, a town of East Siberia, chief town of the Amur government, on the left bank of the Amur, near its confluence with the Zeya in 50° 15′ N. lat. and 127° 38′ E. long., 610 m. by river above Khabarovsk. Founded in 1856, the town had, in 1900, 37,368 inhabitants, and is the seat of the bishop of Amur and Kamchatka. There are steam flour-mills and ironworks. It is a centre for tea exported to Russia, cattle brought from Transbaikalia and Mongolia for the Amur, and for grain.
BLAGOVESHCHENSK, is a town in East Siberia, the capital of the Amur region, located on the left bank of the Amur River near where it meets the Zeya River at 50° 15′ N latitude and 127° 38′ E longitude, 610 km by river from Khabarovsk. Founded in 1856, the town had a population of 37,368 in 1900 and is the seat of the bishop for Amur and Kamchatka. It has steam-powered flour mills and ironworks. The town acts as a hub for tea exported to Russia, cattle brought from Transbaikalia and Mongolia for the Amur region, and grain.
BLAIKIE, WILLIAM GARDEN (1820-1899), Scottish divine, was born on the 5th of February 1820, at Aberdeen, where his father had been the first provost of the reformed corporation. After studying at the Marischal College, where Alexander Bain and David Masson were among his contemporaries, he went in 1839 to Edinburgh to complete his theological course under Thomas Chalmers. In 1842 he was presented to the living of Drumblade by Lord Kintore, with whose family he was connected. The Disruption controversy reached its climax immediately afterwards, and Blaikie, whose sympathies were entirely with Chalmers, was one of the 474 ministers who signed the deed of demission and gave up their livings. He was Free Church minister at Pilrig, between Edinburgh and Leith, from 1844 to 1868. Keenly interested in questions of social reform, his first publication was a pamphlet, which was afterwards enlarged into a book called Better Days for Working People. It received public commendation from Lord Brougham, and 60,000 copies were sold. He formed an association for providing better homes for working people, and the Pilrig Model Buildings were erected. He also undertook the editorship of the Free Church Magazine, and then that of the North British Review, which he carried on until 1863. In 1864 he was asked to undertake the Scottish editorship of the Sunday Magazine, and for this magazine much of his most characteristic literary work was done, especially in the editorial notes, then a new feature in magazine literature.
BLAIKIE, WILLIAM GARDEN (1820-1899), Scottish minister, was born on February 5, 1820, in Aberdeen, where his father was the first provost of the reformed city council. After studying at Marischal College, where he was contemporaries with Alexander Bain and David Masson, he moved to Edinburgh in 1839 to finish his theology studies under Thomas Chalmers. In 1842, he was appointed to the position of minister at Drumblade by Lord Kintore, with whom he had family ties. The Disruption controversy peaked soon after, and Blaikie, fully aligned with Chalmers, was among the 474 ministers who signed the deed of demission, surrendering their positions. He served as the Free Church minister at Pilrig, located between Edinburgh and Leith, from 1844 to 1868. Deeply engaged in social reform issues, his first publication was a pamphlet that was later expanded into a book titled Better Days for Working People. It received praise from Lord Brougham and sold 60,000 copies. He established an association to provide better housing for working individuals, resulting in the creation of the Pilrig Model Buildings. He also took on the role of editor for the Free Church Magazine, and then for the North British Review, which he managed until 1863. In 1864, he was invited to be the Scottish editor of the Sunday Magazine, where much of his distinctive literary work was produced, particularly in the editorial notes, a new addition to magazine literature at the time.
In 1868 Blaikie was called to the chair of apologetics and pastoral theology at New College, Edinburgh. In dealing with the latter subject he was seen at his very best. He had wide experience, a comprehensive grasp of facts, abundant sympathy, an extensive knowledge of men, and a great capacity for teaching. In 1870 he was one of two representatives chosen from the Free Church of Scotland to attend the united general assembly of the Presbyterian churches of the United States. He prolonged his visit to make a thorough acquaintance with American Presbyterianism, and this, followed by a similar tour in Europe, fitted him to become the real founder of the Presbyterian Alliance. Much of his strength in the later years of life was given to this work. In 1892 he was elected to the chairmanship of the general assembly, the last of the moderators who had entered the church before the disruption. In 1897 he resigned his professorship, and died on the 11th of June 1899.
In 1868, Blaikie was appointed to the chair of apologetics and pastoral theology at New College, Edinburgh. In addressing the latter topic, he truly shone. He had extensive experience, a solid understanding of facts, plenty of empathy, a broad knowledge of people, and a strong ability to teach. In 1870, he was one of two representatives selected from the Free Church of Scotland to participate in the united general assembly of the Presbyterian churches in the United States. He extended his visit to gain a deep understanding of American Presbyterianism, and this was followed by a similar trip in Europe, which prepared him to be the true founder of the Presbyterian Alliance. Much of his strength in his later years was dedicated to this work. In 1892, he was elected as the chairman of the general assembly, becoming the last moderator who had joined the church before the disruption. In 1897, he resigned from his professorship and passed away on June 11, 1899.
Blaikie was an ardent philanthropist, and an active and intelligent temperance reformer, in days when this was far from easy. He raised £14,000 for the relief of the Waldensian churches. Although he took an active part in the affairs of his denomination, he was not a mere ecclesiastic. He had a keen eye for the evidences of spiritual growth or decline, and emphasized the need of maintaining a high level of spiritual life. He welcomed Moody to Scotland, and the evangelist made his headquarters with him during his first visit. His best books are The Work of the Ministry—A Manual of Homiletic and Pastoral Theology (1873); The Books of Samuel in the Expositors’ Bible Series (2 vols.); The Personal Life of David Livingstone (1880); After Fifty Years (1893), an account of the Disruption Movement in the form of letters of a grandfather; Thomas Chalmers (1896).
Blaikie was a passionate philanthropist and an active, thoughtful temperance reformer at a time when it wasn't easy to be one. He raised £14,000 to help the Waldensian churches. While he was actively involved in his denomination's affairs, he wasn't just a church person. He had a sharp eye for signs of spiritual growth or decline and stressed the importance of keeping a high level of spiritual life. He welcomed Moody to Scotland, and the evangelist made his headquarters with him during his first visit. His best books are The Work of the Ministry—A Manual of Homiletic and Pastoral Theology (1873); The Books of Samuel in the Expositors’ Bible Series (2 vols.); The Personal Life of David Livingstone (1880); After Fifty Years (1893), a collection of letters from a grandfather about the Disruption Movement; and Thomas Chalmers (1896).
BLAINE, JAMES GILLESPIE (1830-1893), American statesman, was born in West Brownsville, Pennsylvania, on the 31st of January 1830, of sturdy Scottish-Irish stock on the side of his father. He was the great-grandson of Colonel Ephraim Blaine (1741-1804), who during the War of Independence served in the American army, from 1778 to 1782 as commissary-general of the Northern Department. With many early evidences of literary capacity and political aptitude, J.G. Blaine graduated at Washington College in Washington, Pennsylvania, in 1847, and subsequently taught successively in the Military Institute, Georgetown, Kentucky, and in the Institution for the Blind at Philadelphia. During this period, also, he studied law. Settling in Augusta, Maine, in 1854, he became editor of the Kennebec Journal, and subsequently of the Portland Advertiser. But his editorial work was soon abandoned for a more active public career. He was elected to the lower house of the state legislature in 1858, and served four years, the last two as speaker. He also became chairman of the Republican state committee in 1859, and for more than twenty years personally directed every campaign of his party.
BLAINE, JAMES GILLESPIE (1830-1893), American politician, was born in West Brownsville, Pennsylvania, on January 31, 1830, from a strong Scottish-Irish heritage on his father's side. He was the great-grandson of Colonel Ephraim Blaine (1741-1804), who served in the American army as the commissary-general of the Northern Department during the War of Independence from 1778 to 1782. Showing early signs of literary talent and political skill, J.G. Blaine graduated from Washington College in Washington, Pennsylvania, in 1847, and later taught at the Military Institute in Georgetown, Kentucky, as well as at the Institution for the Blind in Philadelphia. During this time, he also studied law. After moving to Augusta, Maine, in 1854, he became the editor of the Kennebec Journal and later of the Portland Advertiser. However, he soon left his editorial role for a more active role in public service. He was elected to the lower house of the state legislature in 1858, serving four years, with the last two as speaker. In 1859, he also became the chairman of the Republican state committee and personally led every campaign for his party for over twenty years.
In 1862 he was elected to Congress, serving in the House thirteen years (December 1863 to December 1876), followed by a little over four years in the Senate. He was chosen speaker of the House in 1869 and served three terms. The House was the fit arena for his political and parliamentary ability. He was a ready and powerful debater, full of resource, and dexterous in controversy. The tempestuous politics of the war and reconstruction period suited his aggressive nature and constructive talent. The measures for the rehabilitation of the states that had seceded from the Union occupied the chief attention of Congress for several years, and Blaine bore a leading part in framing and discussing them. The primary question related to the basis of representation upon which they should be restored to their full rank in the political system. A powerful section contended that the basis should be the body of legal voters, on the ground that the South could not then secure an increment of political power on account of the emancipated blacks unless these blacks were admitted to political rights. Blaine, on the other hand, contended that representation should be based on population instead of voters, as being fairer to the North, where the ratio of voters varied widely, and he insisted that it should be safeguarded by security for impartial suffrage. This view prevailed, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution was substantially Blaine’s proposition. In the same spirit he opposed a scheme of military governments for the southern states, unless associated with a plan by which, upon the acceptance of prescribed conditions, they could release themselves from military rule and resume civil government. He was the first in Congress to oppose the claim, which gained momentary and widespread favour in 1867, that the public debt, pledged in coin, should be paid in greenbacks. The protection of naturalized citizens who, on return to their native land, were subject to prosecution on charges of disloyalty, enlisted his active interest and support, and the agitation, in which he was conspicuous, led to the treaty of 1870 between the United States and Great Britain, which placed adopted and native citizens on the same footing.
In 1862, he was elected to Congress, serving in the House for thirteen years (from December 1863 to December 1876), followed by a little over four years in the Senate. He was elected Speaker of the House in 1869 and served three terms. The House was the right place for his political and parliamentary skills. He was a quick and strong debater, full of resources, and skilled in controversies. The intense politics of the war and reconstruction period matched his aggressive nature and constructive talent. The measures for rehabilitating the states that had seceded from the Union took up most of Congress's attention for several years, and Blaine played a major role in shaping and discussing them. The primary issue was about the basis of representation for restoring them to their full status in the political system. A strong faction argued that the basis should be the group of legal voters, on the grounds that the South could not gain additional political power due to the emancipated blacks unless these blacks were given political rights. Blaine, however, argued that representation should be based on population rather than voters, as it was fairer to the North, where the number of voters varied greatly, and he insisted that it should be protected with guarantees for impartial suffrage. This perspective won out, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution was largely his proposal. In the same spirit, he opposed a plan for military governments in the southern states unless it included a way for them to free themselves from military rule and return to civil governance by meeting certain conditions. He was the first in Congress to oppose the popular claim in 1867 that public debt, pledged in gold, should be paid in greenbacks. The protection of naturalized citizens who faced prosecution for disloyalty upon returning to their home country became a significant focus for him, and the activism he was involved in led to the treaty of 1870 between the United States and Great Britain, which placed adopted citizens and native citizens on the same level.
As the presidential election of 1876 approached, Blaine was clearly the popular favourite of his party. His chance for securing the nomination, however, was materially lessened by persistent charges which were brought against him by the Democrats that as a member of Congress he had been guilty of corruption in his relations with the Little Rock & Fort Smith and the Northern Pacific railways.1 By the majority of Republicans, at least, he was considered to have cleared himself completely, and in the Republican national convention he missed by only twenty-eight votes the nomination for president, being finally beaten by a combination of the supporters of all the other candidates. Thereupon he entered the Senate, where his activity was unabated. Currency legislation was especially prominent. Blaine, who had previously opposed greenback inflation now resisted depreciated silver coinage. He was the earnest champion of the advancement of American shipping, and advocated liberal subsidies, insisting that the policy of protection should be applied on sea as well as on land. The Republican national 33 convention of 1880, divided between the two nearly equal forces of Blaine and General U.S. Grant—John Sherman of Ohio also having a considerable following—struggled through thirty-six ballots, when the friends of Blaine, combining with those of Sherman, succeeded in nominating General James A. Garfield. In the new administration Blaine became secretary of state, but, owing to the assassination of President Garfield and the reorganization of the cabinet by President Chester A. Arthur, he held the office only until December 1881. His brief service was distinguished by several notable steps. In order to promote the friendly understanding and co-operation of the nations on the American continents he projected a Pan-American congress, which, after being arranged for, was frustrated by his retirement. He also sought to secure a modification of the Clayton-Bulwer treaty, and in an extended correspondence with the British government strongly asserted the policy of an exclusive American control of any isthmian canal which might be built to connect the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
As the presidential election of 1876 approached, Blaine was clearly the popular favorite in his party. However, his chances for securing the nomination were significantly reduced by ongoing accusations from Democrats that he had engaged in corruption while serving in Congress, specifically in his dealings with the Little Rock & Fort Smith and the Northern Pacific railways. For the majority of Republicans, at least, he was seen as having completely cleared his name, and in the Republican national convention, he lost the presidential nomination by just twenty-eight votes, ultimately being defeated by a coalition of supporters for all the other candidates. He then entered the Senate, where he remained very active. Currency legislation was a significant focus. Blaine, who had previously opposed greenback inflation, now resisted depreciated silver coinage. He was a strong advocate for the advancement of American shipping and supported generous subsidies, insisting that the policy of protection should apply at sea as well as on land. The Republican national convention of 1880 was divided nearly evenly between the supporters of Blaine and General U.S. Grant, with John Sherman of Ohio also having a notable following. After thirty-six ballots, the friends of Blaine joined forces with those of Sherman to successfully nominate General James A. Garfield. In the new administration, Blaine became secretary of state, but due to the assassination of President Garfield and the cabinet reorganization by President Chester A. Arthur, he held the position only until December 1881. His brief time in office was marked by several significant actions. To foster friendly relations and cooperation among the nations of the Americas, he planned a Pan-American congress, which was ultimately derailed by his departure. He also attempted to secure a modification of the Clayton-Bulwer treaty and, through extensive correspondence with the British government, strongly asserted the need for exclusive American control over any isthmian canal that might be constructed to link the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
With undiminished hold on the imagination and devotion of his followers he was nominated for president in 1884. After a heated canvass, in which he made a series of brilliant speeches, he was beaten by a narrow margin in New York. By many, including Blaine himself, the defeat was attributed to the effect of a phrase, “Rum, Romanism and Rebellion,” used by a clergyman, Rev. Samuel D. Burchard (1812-1891), on the 29th of October 1884, in Blaine’s presence, to characterize what, in his opinion, the Democratic party stood for. The phrase was not Blaine’s, but his opponents made use of it to misrepresent his attitude toward the Roman Catholics, large numbers of whom are supposed, in consequence, to have withdrawn their support. Refusing to be a presidential candidate in 1888, he became secretary of state under President Harrison, and resumed his work which had been interrupted nearly eight years before. The Pan-American congress, then projected, now met in Washington, and Blaine, as its master spirit, presided over and guided its deliberation through its session of five months. Its most important conclusions were for reciprocity in trade, a continental railway and compulsory arbitration in international complications. Shaping the tariff legislation for this policy, Blaine negotiated a large number of reciprocity treaties which augmented the commerce of his country. He upheld American rights in Samoa, pursued a vigorous diplomacy with Italy over the lynching of eleven Italians, all except three of them American naturalized citizens, in New Orleans on the 14th of May 1891, held a firm attitude during the strained relations between the United States and Chile (growing largely out of the killing and wounding of American sailors of the U.S. ship “Baltimore” by Chileans in Valparaiso on the 16th of October 1891), and carried on with Great Britain a resolute controversy over the seal fisheries of Bering Sea,—a difference afterwards settled by arbitration. He resigned on the 4th of June 1892, on the eve of the meeting of the Republican national convention, wherein his name was ineffectually used, and he died at Washington, D.C., on the 27th of January 1803.
With the same strong hold on the imagination and loyalty of his followers, he was nominated for president in 1884. After a heated campaign, during which he delivered a series of impressive speeches, he lost by a narrow margin in New York. Many, including Blaine himself, believed the loss was due to a phrase, “Rum, Romanism and Rebellion,” used by a clergyman, Rev. Samuel D. Burchard (1812-1891), on October 29, 1884, in Blaine’s presence, to describe what he thought the Democratic party represented. The phrase wasn’t Blaine’s, but his opponents used it to distort his stance toward Roman Catholics, causing many of them to withdraw their support as a result. Declining to run for president in 1888, he became Secretary of State under President Harrison and resumed his work that had been interrupted nearly eight years earlier. The Pan-American Congress, then underway, met in Washington, and Blaine, as its key leader, presided over and guided its sessions for five months. Its most significant outcomes included trade reciprocity, a continental railway, and mandatory arbitration in international disputes. In shaping tariff legislation for this policy, Blaine negotiated many reciprocity treaties that increased his country’s commerce. He supported American rights in Samoa, took a strong diplomatic stance with Italy regarding the lynching of eleven Italians—most of whom were American naturalized citizens—in New Orleans on May 14, 1891, maintained a firm position during the tense relations between the United States and Chile (largely due to the killing and wounding of American sailors from the U.S. ship “Baltimore” by Chileans in Valparaiso on October 16, 1891), and engaged in a determined dispute with Great Britain over the seal fisheries of Bering Sea, which was later resolved by arbitration. He resigned on June 4, 1892, just before the Republican national convention, where his name was used ineffectively, and he died in Washington, D.C., on January 27, 1903.
During his later years of leisure he wrote Twenty Years of Congress (1884-1886), a brilliant historical work in two volumes. Of singularly alert faculties, with a remarkable knowledge of the men and history of his country, and an extraordinary memory, his masterful talent for politics and state-craft, together with his captivating manner and engaging personality, gave him, for nearly two decades, an unrivalled hold upon the fealty and affection of his party.
During his later years of leisure, he wrote Twenty Years of Congress (1884-1886), a brilliant historical work in two volumes. With sharp awareness, deep knowledge of the people and history of his country, and an exceptional memory, his tremendous skill in politics and governance, along with his charming demeanor and engaging personality, gave him an unmatched grip on the loyalty and affection of his party for nearly two decades.
See the Biography of James G. Blaine (Norwich, Conn., 1895) by Mary Abigail Dodge (“Gail Hamilton”), and, in the “American Statesmen Series,” James G. Blaine (Boston, 1905) by C.E. Stanwood; also Mrs Blaine’s Letters (1908).
See the Biography of James G. Blaine (Norwich, Conn., 1895) by Mary Abigail Dodge (“Gail Hamilton”), and, in the “American Statesmen Series,” James G. Blaine (Boston, 1905) by C.E. Stanwood; also Mrs. Blaine’s Letters (1908).
BLAINVILLE, HENRI MARIE DUCROTAY DE (1777-1850), French naturalist, was born at Arques, near Dieppe, on the 12th of September 1777. About 1796 he went to Paris to study painting, but he ultimately devoted himself to natural history, and attracted the attention of Baron Cuvier, for whom he occasionally lectured at the Collège de France and at the Athenaeum. In 1812 he was aided by Cuvier to obtain the chair of anatomy and zoology in the Faculty of Sciences at Paris, but subsequently an estrangement grew up between the two men and ended in open enmity. In 1825 Blainville was admitted a member of the Academy of Sciences; and in 1830 he was appointed to succeed J.B. Lamarck in the chair of natural history at the museum. Two years later, on the death of Cuvier, he obtained the chair of comparative anatomy, which he continued to occupy for the space of eighteen years, proving himself no unworthy successor to his great teacher. He died at Paris on the 1st of May 1850. Besides many separate memoirs, he was the author of Prodrome d’une nouvelle distribution méthodique du règne animal (1816); Ostéographic ou description iconographique comparée du squelette, &c. (1839-1864); Faune française (1821-1830); Corns de physiologie générale et comparée (1833); Manuel de malacologie et de conchyliologie (1825-1827); Histoire des sciences de l’organisme (1845).
BLAINVILLE, HENRI MARIE DUCROTAY DE (1777-1850), French naturalist, was born in Arques, near Dieppe, on September 12, 1777. Around 1796, he moved to Paris to study painting but eventually focused on natural history and caught the attention of Baron Cuvier, for whom he sometimes lectured at the Collège de France and the Athenaeum. In 1812, Cuvier helped him secure the position of chair in anatomy and zoology in the Faculty of Sciences at Paris. However, a rift developed between the two men, leading to open hostility. In 1825, Blainville was admitted as a member of the Academy of Sciences; in 1830, he was appointed to succeed J.B. Lamarck as the chair of natural history at the museum. Two years later, after Cuvier's death, he took on the chair of comparative anatomy, which he held for eighteen years, proving himself a worthy successor to his great mentor. He died in Paris on May 1, 1850. In addition to many separate papers, he authored Prodrome d’une nouvelle distribution méthodique du règne animal (1816); Ostéographic ou description iconographique comparée du squelette, & c. (1839-1864); Faune française (1821-1830); Corns de physiologie générale et comparée (1833); Manuel de malacologie et de conchyliologie (1825-1827); Histoire des sciences de l’organisme (1845).
BLAIR, FRANCIS PRESTON (1791-1876), American journalist and politician, was born at Abingdon, Virginia, on the 12th of April 1791. He removed to Kentucky, graduated at Transylvania University in 1811, took to journalism, and was a contributor to Amos Kendall’s paper, the Argus, at Frankfort. In 1830, having become an ardent follower of Andrew Jackson, he was made editor of the Washington Globe, the recognized organ of the Jackson party. In this capacity, and as a member of Jackson’s “Kitchen Cabinet,” he long exerted a powerful influence; the Globe was the administration organ until 1841, and the chief Democratic organ until 1845; Blair ceased to be its editor in 1849. In 1848 he actively supported Martin Van Buren, the Free Soil candidate, for the presidency, and in 1852 he supported Franklin Pierce, but soon afterwards helped to organize the new Republican party, and presided at its preliminary convention at Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, in February 1856. He was influential in securing the nomination of John C. Frémont at the June convention (1856), and of Abraham Lincoln in 1860. After Lincoln’s re-election in 1864 Blair thought that his former close personal relations with the Confederate leaders might aid in bringing about a cessation of hostilities, and with Lincoln’s consent went unofficially to Richmond and induced President Jefferson Davis to appoint commissioners to confer with representatives of the United States. This resulted in the futile “Hampton Roads Conference” of the 3rd of February 1865 (see Lincoln, Abraham). After the Civil War Blair became a supporter of President Johnson’s reconstruction policy, and eventually rejoined the Democratic party. He died at Silver Spring, Maryland, on the 18th of October 1876.
BLAIR, FRANCIS PRESTON (1791-1876), was an American journalist and politician, born in Abingdon, Virginia, on April 12, 1791. He moved to Kentucky, graduated from Transylvania University in 1811, started his career in journalism, and contributed to Amos Kendall’s newspaper, the Argus, in Frankfort. In 1830, after becoming a strong supporter of Andrew Jackson, he was appointed editor of the Washington Globe, the official newspaper of the Jackson party. In this role, and as a member of Jackson’s “Kitchen Cabinet,” he had significant influence; the Globe served as the administration’s paper until 1841 and as the main Democratic paper until 1845, when Blair stepped down as editor in 1849. In 1848, he actively backed Martin Van Buren, the Free Soil candidate for president, and in 1852 he supported Franklin Pierce. However, he later helped to establish the Republican party and chaired its initial convention in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in February 1856. He played a key role in securing the nomination of John C. Frémont at the June convention (1856) and of Abraham Lincoln in 1860. After Lincoln’s re-election in 1864, Blair believed his previous close personal ties with Confederate leaders could help end the fighting, and with Lincoln's approval, he unofficially went to Richmond and persuaded President Jefferson Davis to appoint commissioners to discuss peace with representatives of the United States. This led to the ineffective “Hampton Roads Conference” on February 3, 1865 (see Lincoln, Abraham). After the Civil War, Blair supported President Johnson’s reconstruction policy and eventually rejoined the Democratic party. He passed away in Silver Spring, Maryland, on October 18, 1876.
His son, Montgomery Blair (1813-1883), politician and lawyer, was born in Franklin county, Kentucky, on the 10th of May 1813. He graduated at West Point in 1835, but, after a year’s service in the Seminole War, left the army, studied law, and began practice at St Louis, Missouri. After serving as United States district attorney (1839-1843), as mayor of St Louis (1842-1843), and as judge of the court of common pleas (1843-1849), he removed to Maryland (1852), and devoted himself to law practice principally in the Federal supreme court. He was United States solicitor in the court of claims from 1855 until 1858, and was associated with George T. Curtis as counsel for the plaintiff in the Dred Scott case in 1857. In 1860 he took an active part in the presidential campaign in behalf of Lincoln, in whose cabinet he was postmaster-general from 1861 until September 1864, when he resigned as a result of the hostility of the Radical Republican faction, who stipulated that Blair’s retirement should follow the withdrawal of Frémont’s name as a candidate for the presidential nomination in that year. Under his administration such reforms and improvements as the establishment of free city delivery, the adoption of a money order system, and the use of railway mail cars were instituted—the last having been suggested by George B. Armstrong (d. 1871), of Chicago, who from 1869 until his death was general superintendent of the United States railway mail service. Differing from the Republican party on the reconstruction policy, Blair gave his adherence to the Democratic party after the Civil 34 War. He died at Silver Spring, Maryland, on the 27th of July 1883.
His son, Montgomery Blair (1813-1883), a politician and lawyer, was born in Franklin County, Kentucky, on May 10, 1813. He graduated from West Point in 1835, but after a year of service in the Seminole War, he left the army, studied law, and started practicing in St. Louis, Missouri. After serving as the United States district attorney (1839-1843), as mayor of St. Louis (1842-1843), and as a judge of the court of common pleas (1843-1849), he moved to Maryland in 1852 and focused mainly on practicing law in the Federal Supreme Court. He was the United States solicitor in the court of claims from 1855 to 1858 and worked with George T. Curtis as counsel for the plaintiff in the Dred Scott case in 1857. In 1860, he played an active role in the presidential campaign supporting Lincoln, who appointed him postmaster-general from 1861 until September 1864. He resigned due to the opposition from the Radical Republican faction, who insisted that his retirement should coincide with the removal of Frémont’s name from the presidential nomination that year. During his time in office, he implemented reforms and improvements such as establishing free city delivery, adopting a money order system, and using railway mail cars—the latter was suggested by George B. Armstrong (d. 1871), who served as the general superintendent of the United States railway mail service from 1869 until his death. Differing from the Republican party on reconstruction policy, Blair joined the Democratic party after the Civil War. He passed away in Silver Spring, Maryland, on July 27, 1883.
Another son, Francis Preston Blair, jun. (1821-1875), soldier and political leader, was born at Lexington, Kentucky, on the 19th of February 1821. After graduating at Princeton in 1841 he practised law in St Louis, and later served in the Mexican War. He was ardently opposed to the extension of slavery and supported Martin Van Buren, the Free Soil candidate for the presidency in 1848. He served from 1852 to 1856 in the Missouri legislature as a Free Soil Democrat, in 1856 joined the Republican party, and in 1857-1860 and 1861-1862 was a member of Congress, where he proved an able debater. Immediately after South Carolina’s secession, Blair, believing that the southern leaders were planning to carry Missouri into the movement, began active efforts to prevent it and personally organized and equipped a secret body of 1000 men to be ready for the emergency. When hostilities became inevitable, acting in conjunction with Captain (later General) Nathaniel Lyon, he suddenly transferred the arms in the Federal arsenal at St Louis to Alton, Illinois, and a few days later (May 10, 1861) surrounded and captured a force of state guards which had been stationed at Camp Jackson in the suburbs of St Louis with the intention of seizing the arsenal. This action gave the Federal cause a decisive initial advantage in Missouri. Blair was promoted brigadier-general of volunteers in August 1862 and a major-general in November 1862. In Congress as chairman of the important military affairs committee his services were of the greatest value. He commanded a division in the Vicksburg campaign and in the fighting about Chattanooga, and was one of Sherman’s corps commanders in the final campaigns in Georgia and the Carolinas. In 1866 like his father and brother he opposed the Congressional reconstruction policy, and on that issue left the Republican party. In 1868 he was the Democratic candidate for vice-president on the ticket with Horatio Seymour. In 1871-1873 he was a United States senator from Missouri. He died in St Louis, on the 8th of July 1875.
Another son, Francis Preston Blair, Jr. (1821-1875), soldier and political leader, was born in Lexington, Kentucky, on February 19, 1821. After graduating from Princeton in 1841, he practiced law in St. Louis and later served in the Mexican War. He was strongly against the expansion of slavery and supported Martin Van Buren, the Free Soil candidate for president in 1848. He served in the Missouri legislature as a Free Soil Democrat from 1852 to 1856, joined the Republican party in 1856, and was a member of Congress from 1857 to 1860 and again from 1861 to 1862, where he was known as an effective debater. After South Carolina seceded, Blair, believing that southern leaders were planning to drag Missouri into the conflict, took active steps to prevent it and personally organized and equipped a secret group of 1,000 men to be ready for any situation. When fighting became unavoidable, he worked together with Captain (later General) Nathaniel Lyon, and quickly moved the weapons from the Federal arsenal in St. Louis to Alton, Illinois. A few days later (May 10, 1861), he surrounded and captured a group of state guards that had been stationed at Camp Jackson on the outskirts of St. Louis, intending to seize the arsenal. This move gave the Federal cause a significant early advantage in Missouri. Blair was promoted to brigadier general of volunteers in August 1862 and to major general in November 1862. In Congress, as chairman of the important military affairs committee, his contributions were extremely valuable. He commanded a division in the Vicksburg campaign and in the fighting around Chattanooga, and was one of Sherman’s corps commanders during the final campaigns in Georgia and the Carolinas. In 1866, like his father and brother, he opposed the Congressional reconstruction policy and left the Republican party over that issue. In 1868, he was the Democratic candidate for vice president on the ticket with Horatio Seymour. He served as a United States senator from Missouri from 1871 to 1873. He died in St. Louis on July 8, 1875.
BLAIR, HUGH (1718-1800), Scottish Presbyterian divine, was born on the 7th of April 1718, at Edinburgh, where his father was a merchant. Entering the university in 1730 he graduated M.A. in 1739; his thesis, De Fundamentis et Obligations Legis Naturae, contains an outline of the moral principles afterwards unfolded in his sermons. He was licensed to preach in 1741, and a few months later the earl of Leven, hearing of his eloquence, presented him to the parish of Collessie in Fife. In 1743 he was elected to the second charge of the Canongate church, Edinburgh, where he ministered until removed to Lady Yester’s, one of the city churches, in 1754. In 1757 the university of St Andrews conferred on him the degree of D.D., and in the following year he was promoted to the High Church, Edinburgh, the most important charge in Scotland. In 1759 he began, under the patronage of Lord Kames, to deliver a course of lectures on composition, the success of which led to the foundation of a chair of rhetoric and belles lettres in the Edinburgh University. To this chair he was appointed in 1762, with a salary of £70 a year. Having long taken interest in the Celtic poetry of the Highlands, he published in 1763 a laudatory Dissertation on Macpherson’s Ossian, the authenticity of which he maintained. In 1777 the first volume of his Sermons appeared. It was succeeded by four other volumes, all of which met with the greatest success. Samuel Johnson praised them warmly, and they were translated into almost every language of Europe. In 1780 George III. conferred upon Blair a pension of £200 a year. In 1783 he retired from his professorship and published his Lectures on Rhetoric, which have been frequently reprinted. He died on the 27th of December 1800. Blair belonged to the “moderate” or latitudinarian party, and his Sermons have been criticized as wanting in doctrinal definiteness. His works display little originality, but are written in a flowing and elaborate style. He is remembered chiefly by the place he fills in the literature of his time. Blair’s Sermons is a typical religious book of the period that preceded the Anglican revival.
BLAIR, HUGH (1718-1800), Scottish Presbyterian minister, was born on April 7, 1718, in Edinburgh, where his father was a merchant. He started university in 1730 and graduated with an M.A. in 1739; his thesis, De Fundamentis et Obligations Legis Naturae, outlines the moral principles that he later developed in his sermons. He was licensed to preach in 1741, and a few months later, the Earl of Leven, impressed by his eloquence, appointed him to the parish of Collessie in Fife. In 1743, he was elected to the second charge of the Canongate church in Edinburgh, where he served until he moved to Lady Yester’s, one of the city churches, in 1754. In 1757, the University of St Andrews awarded him the degree of D.D., and the following year, he was promoted to the High Church in Edinburgh, the most significant position in Scotland. In 1759, under the patronage of Lord Kames, he began a series of lectures on composition, which turned out to be so successful that it led to the establishment of a chair of rhetoric and belles lettres at Edinburgh University. He was appointed to this chair in 1762, earning a salary of £70 a year. Having long been interested in the Celtic poetry of the Highlands, he published a commendatory Dissertation on Macpherson’s Ossian in 1763, defending its authenticity. In 1777, the first volume of his Sermons was published, followed by four more volumes, all of which achieved significant success. Samuel Johnson praised them highly, and they were translated into nearly every European language. In 1780, George III granted Blair a pension of £200 a year. In 1783, he retired from his professorship and published his Lectures on Rhetoric, which have been frequently reprinted. He passed away on December 27, 1800. Blair was part of the “moderate” or latitudinarian group, and his Sermons have been criticized for lacking doctrinal clarity. His works show little originality but are written in a smooth and intricate style. He is mainly remembered for his role in the literature of his time. Blair’s Sermons exemplify a typical religious book from the period before the Anglican revival.
See J. Hall, Account of Life and Writings of Hugh Blair (1807).
See J. Hall, Account of Life and Writings of Hugh Blair (1807).
BLAIR, JAMES (1656-1743), American divine and educationalist, was born in Scotland, probably at Edinburgh, in 1656. He graduated M.A. at Edinburgh University in 1673, was beneficed in the Episcopal Church in Scotland, and for a time was rector of Cranston Parish in the diocese of Edinburgh. In 1682 he left Scotland for England, and three years later was sent by the bishop of London, Henry Compton, as a missionary to Virginia. He soon gained great influence over the colonists both in ecclesiastical and in civil affairs, and, according to Prof. Moses Coit Tyler, “probably no other man in the colonial time did so much for the intellectual life of Virginia.” He was the minister of Henrico parish from 1685 until 1694, of the Jamestown church from 1694 until 1710, and of Bruton church at Williamsburg from 1710 until his death. From 1689 until his death he was the commissary of the bishop of London for Virginia, the highest ecclesiastical position in the colony, his duties consisting “in visiting the parishes, correcting the lives of the clergy, and keeping them orderly.” In 1693, by the appointment of King William III., he became a member of the council of Virginia, of which he was for many years the president. Largely because of charges brought against them by Blair, Governor Sir Edmund Andros, Lieutenant-governor Francis Nicholson, and Lieutenant-governor Alexander Spotswood were removed in 1698, 1705 and 1722 respectively. Blair’s greatest service to the colony was rendered as the founder, and the president from 1693 until his death, of the College of William and Mary, for which he himself secured a charter in England. “Thus, James Blair may be called,” says Tyler, “the creator of the healthiest and most extensive intellectual influence that was felt in the Southern group of colonies before the Revolution.” He died on the 18th of April 1743, and was buried at Jamestown, Va. He published a collection of 117 discourses under the title Our Saviour’s Divine Sermon on the Mount (4 vols., 1722; second edition, 1732), and, in collaboration with Henry Hartwell and Edward Chilton, a work entitled The Present State of Virginia and the College (1727; written in 1693), probably the best account of the Virginia of that time.
BLAIR, JAMES (1656-1743), American minister and educator, was born in Scotland, likely in Edinburgh, in 1656. He graduated with an M.A. from Edinburgh University in 1673, served in the Episcopal Church in Scotland, and was the rector of Cranston Parish in the diocese of Edinburgh for a time. In 1682, he left Scotland for England, and three years later, he was sent by the bishop of London, Henry Compton, as a missionary to Virginia. He quickly became influential among the colonists in both religious and civil matters, and according to Prof. Moses Coit Tyler, “probably no other man in the colonial period contributed as much to the intellectual life of Virginia.” He was the minister of Henrico Parish from 1685 until 1694, of Jamestown Church from 1694 until 1710, and of Bruton Church in Williamsburg from 1710 until his death. From 1689 until his death, he served as the commissary to the bishop of London for Virginia, the highest church position in the colony, where his duties included “visiting the parishes, correcting the lives of the clergy, and keeping them orderly.” In 1693, appointed by King William III, he became a member of the Virginia council, of which he was the president for many years. Largely due to accusations made by Blair, Governor Sir Edmund Andros, Lieutenant-governor Francis Nicholson, and Lieutenant-governor Alexander Spotswood were removed in 1698, 1705, and 1722, respectively. Blair’s greatest contribution to the colony was as the founder and president of the College of William and Mary from 1693 until his death, for which he obtained a charter in England. “Thus, James Blair may be called,” says Tyler, “the creator of the healthiest and most extensive intellectual influence that was felt in the Southern group of colonies before the Revolution.” He died on April 18, 1743, and was buried in Jamestown, VA. He published a collection of 117 discourses titled Our Saviour’s Divine Sermon on the Mount (4 vols., 1722; second edition, 1732), and, in collaboration with Henry Hartwell and Edward Chilton, a work called The Present State of Virginia and the College (1727; written in 1693), which is probably the best account of Virginia at that time.
See Daniel E. Motley’s Life of Commissary James Blair (Baltimore, 1901; series xix. No. 10, of the Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Science), and, for a short sketch and an estimate, M.C. Tyler’s A History of American Literature, 1607-1765 (New York, 1878).
See Daniel E. Motley’s Life of Commissary James Blair (Baltimore, 1901; series xix. No. 10, of the Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Science), and for a brief overview and assessment, M.C. Tyler’s A History of American Literature, 1607-1765 (New York, 1878).
BLAIR, ROBERT (1699-1746), Scottish poet, eldest son of the Rev. Robert Blair, one of the king’s chaplains, was born at Edinburgh in 1699. He was educated at Edinburgh University and in Holland, and in 1731 was appointed to the living of Athelstaneford in East Lothian. He married in 1738 Isabella, daughter of Professor William Law. The possession of a small fortune gave him leisure for his favourite pursuits, gardening and the study of English poets. He died at Athelstaneford on the 4th of February 1746. His only considerable work, The Grave (1743), is a poem written in blank verse of great vigour and freshness, and is much less conventional than its gloomy subject might lead one to expect. Its religious subject no doubt contributed to its great popularity, especially in Scotland; but the vogue it attained was justified by its picturesque imagery and occasional felicity of expression. It inspired William Blake to undertake a series of twelve illustrative designs, which were engraved by Louis Schiavonetti, and published in 1808.
BLAIR, ROBERT (1699-1746), Scottish poet and the eldest son of Rev. Robert Blair, one of the king’s chaplains, was born in Edinburgh in 1699. He studied at Edinburgh University and in Holland, and in 1731, he was appointed to the position at Athelstaneford in East Lothian. He married Isabella in 1738, the daughter of Professor William Law. Having a small fortune allowed him the time to pursue his interests in gardening and studying English poets. He died at Athelstaneford on February 4, 1746. His only significant work, The Grave (1743), is a poem written in blank verse that has great energy and freshness, and it’s much less conventional than one might expect given its somber topic. Its religious theme likely contributed to its popularity, especially in Scotland; however, the acclaim it received was justified by its vivid imagery and occasional brilliance in expression. It inspired William Blake to create a series of twelve illustrations, which were engraved by Louis Schiavonetti and published in 1808.
See the biographical introduction prefixed to his Poetical Works, by Dr Robert Anderson, in his Poets of Great Britain, vol. viii. (1794.)
See the biographical introduction before his Poetical Works, by Dr. Robert Anderson, in his Poets of Great Britain, vol. viii. (1794.)
BLAIR ATHOLL (Gaelic blair, “a plain”), a village and parish of Perthshire, Scotland, 35¼ m. N.W. of Perth by the Highland railway. Pop. (1901) 367; of parish, 1722. It is situated at the confluence of the Tilt and the Garry. The oldest part of Blair Castle, a seat of the duke of Atholl, dates from 1269; as restored and enlarged in 1869-1872 from the plans of David Bryce, R.S.A., it is a magnificent example of the Scottish baronial style. It was occupied by the marquess of Montrose prior to the battle of Tippermuir in 1644, stormed by the Cromwellians in 1653, and garrisoned on behalf of James II. in 1689. The Young Pretender stayed in it in 1743, and the duke of 35 Cumberland in 1746. The body of Viscount Dundee, conveyed hither from the battlefield of Killiecrankie, was buried in the church of Old Blair, in which a monument was erected to his memory in 1889 by the 7th duke of Atholl. The grounds surrounding the castle are among the most beautiful in the Highlands. A golf course has been laid down south-east of the village, between the railway and the Garry, and every September a great display of Highland games is held. Ben-y-gloe (3671 ft. high), the scene of the hunt given in 1529 by the earl of Atholl in honour of James V. and the queen dowager, may be climbed by way of Fender Burn, a left-hand tributary of the Tilt. The falls of Fender, near the old bridge of Tilt, are eclipsed by the falls of Bruar, 4 m. west of Blair Atholl, formed by the Bruar, which, rising in Ben Dearg (3304 ft.), flows into the Garry after an impetuous course of 10 m.
BLAIR ATHOLL (Gaelic blair, “a plain”), is a village and parish in Perthshire, Scotland, located 35¼ miles northwest of Perth by the Highland railway. Population (1901) was 367; the parish had 1722 residents. It sits at the junction of the Tilt and Garry rivers. The oldest part of Blair Castle, the residence of the Duke of Atholl, dates back to 1269; it was restored and expanded between 1869 and 1872 by architect David Bryce, R.S.A., and is a stunning example of the Scottish baronial style. It was occupied by the Marquess of Montrose before the battle of Tippermuir in 1644, captured by Cromwell's forces in 1653, and was garrisoned for James II in 1689. The Young Pretender stayed there in 1743, and the Duke of Cumberland was there in 1746. The body of Viscount Dundee, brought from the battlefield of Killiecrankie, was buried in the church of Old Blair, where a monument was erected in his honor in 1889 by the 7th Duke of Atholl. The grounds around the castle are among the most stunning in the Highlands. A golf course has been established southeast of the village, between the railway and the Garry, and each September, a grand Highland games event is held. Ben-y-gloe (3671 ft. high), where the Earl of Atholl hosted a hunt in 1529 in honor of James V and the queen dowager, can be climbed via Fender Burn, a left-hand tributary of the Tilt. The Fender Falls, near the old bridge of Tilt, are overshadowed by the Bruar Falls, located 4 miles west of Blair Atholl, which are created by the Bruar River that rises in Ben Dearg (3304 ft.) and flows into the Garry after a thrilling 10-mile journey.
BLAIRGOWRIE, a police burgh of Perthshire, Scotland, situated on the Ericht. Pop. (1901) 3378. It is the terminus of a branch line of the Caledonian railway from Coupar Angus, from which it is 4¾ m. distant, and is 16 m. N. by E. of Perth by road. The town is entirely modern, and owes its progress to the water-power supplied by the Ericht for linen and jute factories. There are also sawmills, breweries and a large factory for bee appliances. Strawberries, raspberries and other fruits are largely grown in the neighbourhood. A park was presented to the town in 1892. On the left bank of the Ericht, opposite Blairgowrie, with which it is connected by a four-arched bridge, stands the town and police burgh of Rattray (pop. 2019), where there are flax and jute mills. Donald Cargill the Covenanter, who was executed at Edinburgh, was a native of the parish. Four miles west of Blairgowrie, on the coach road to Dunkeld, lies Loch Clunie, of some interest historically. On a crannog in the lake are the ruins of a small castle which belonged to James (“the Admirable”) Crichton, and the large mound near the loch was the site of the castle in which Edward I. lodged on one of his Scottish expeditions.
BLAIRGOWRIE, is a police burgh in Perthshire, Scotland, situated on the Ericht River. Population (1901): 3,378. It serves as the end of a branch line of the Caledonian railway coming from Coupar Angus, which is 4¾ miles away, and is 16 miles north by east of Perth by road. The town is completely modern and has grown thanks to the water power provided by the Ericht for linen and jute factories. There are also sawmills, breweries, and a large factory that produces beekeeping equipment. Strawberries, raspberries, and other fruits are extensively cultivated in the area. A park was donated to the town in 1892. On the left bank of the Ericht, directly across from Blairgowrie and connected by a four-arched bridge, lies the town and police burgh of Rattray (population 2,019), which has flax and jute mills. Donald Cargill, the Covenanter who was executed in Edinburgh, was born in the parish. Four miles west of Blairgowrie, along the coach road to Dunkeld, is Loch Clunie, which has some historical significance. On a crannog in the lake, there are ruins of a small castle that belonged to James ("the Admirable") Crichton, and the large mound near the loch was the site of the castle where Edward I lodged during one of his Scottish campaigns.
BLAKE, EDWARD (1833- ), Irish-Canadian statesman, eldest son of William Hume Blake of Cashel Grove, Co. Galway, who settled in Canada in 1832, and there became a distinguished lawyer and chancellor of Ontario, was born on the 13th of October 1833 at Adelaide in Middlesex county, Ontario. Educated at Upper Canada College and the university of Toronto, Blake was called to the bar in 1856 and quickly obtained a good practice, becoming Q.C. in 1864. In 1867 he was elected member for West Durham in the Dominion parliament, and for South Bruce in the provincial legislature, in which he became leader of the Liberal opposition two years later. On the defeat of John Sandfield Macdonald’s government in 1871 Blake became prime minister of Ontario, but resigned this office the same year in consequence of the abolition of dual representation. He declined the leadership of the Liberal party in the Dominion parliament, but, having taken an active part in bringing about the overthrow of Sir John Macdonald’s ministry in 1873, joined the Liberal cabinet of Alexander Mackenzie, though without portfolio or salary. Impaired health soon compelled him to resign, and to take the voyage to Europe; on his return in 1875 he rejoined the cabinet as minister of justice, in which office it fell to him to take the chief part in framing the constitution of the supreme court of Canada. Continued ill-health compelled him in 1877 again to seek rest in Europe, having first exchanged the portfolio of justice for the less exacting office of president of the council. During his absence the Liberal government was driven from power by the elections of 1878; and Blake himself, having failed to secure re-election, was for a short time without a seat in parliament. From 1880 to 1887 he was leader of the opposition, being succeeded on his resignation of the position in the latter year by Mr (afterwards Sir) Wilfrid Laurier. In 1892 he became a member of the British House of Commons as an Irish Nationalist, being elected for South Longford. But he did not fulfil the expectations which had been formed on the strength of his colonial reputation; he took no very prominent part in debate, and gave little evidence of his undoubted oratorical gifts. In 1907 he retired from public life. In 1858 he had married Margaret, daughter of Benjamin Cronyn, first bishop of Huron.
BLAKE, EDWARD (1833- ), Irish-Canadian politician, the eldest son of William Hume Blake from Cashel Grove, County Galway, who moved to Canada in 1832 and became a prominent lawyer and chancellor of Ontario, was born on October 13, 1833, in Adelaide, Middlesex County, Ontario. He was educated at Upper Canada College and the University of Toronto. Blake was called to the bar in 1856 and quickly built a successful practice, becoming Q.C. in 1864. In 1867, he was elected as the representative for West Durham in the Dominion parliament and for South Bruce in the provincial legislature, where he became the leader of the Liberal opposition two years later. After the defeat of John Sandfield Macdonald’s government in 1871, Blake became the prime minister of Ontario, but resigned later that year due to the abolition of dual representation. He turned down the leadership of the Liberal party in the Dominion parliament but, after playing a key role in the fall of Sir John Macdonald’s ministry in 1873, joined the Liberal cabinet of Alexander Mackenzie, albeit without a specific role or salary. Poor health soon forced him to resign and take a trip to Europe; upon his return in 1875, he rejoined the cabinet as the minister of justice, where he was primarily responsible for shaping the constitution of the Supreme Court of Canada. Ongoing health issues led him to again seek rest in Europe in 1877, having first exchanged the justice portfolio for the less demanding position of president of the council. During his absence, the Liberal government lost power in the 1878 elections, and Blake, unable to secure re-election, found himself without a seat in parliament for a short time. From 1880 to 1887, he was the leader of the opposition, and upon his resignation in the latter year, Mr. (later Sir) Wilfrid Laurier succeeded him. In 1892, he became a member of the British House of Commons as an Irish Nationalist, representing South Longford. However, he did not meet the expectations set by his colonial reputation; he was not very active in debates and showed little of his considerable oratorical talent. In 1907, he retired from public life. In 1858, he married Margaret, daughter of Benjamin Cronyn, the first bishop of Huron.
See John Charles Dent, The Last Forty Years: Canada Since the Union of 1841 (2 vols., Toronto, 1881); J.S. Willison, Sir Wilfrid Laurier and the Liberal Party (2 vols., London, 1904).
See John Charles Dent, The Last Forty Years: Canada Since the Union of 1841 (2 vols., Toronto, 1881); J.S. Willison, Sir Wilfrid Laurier and the Liberal Party (2 vols., London, 1904).
BLAKE, ROBERT (1509-1657), English parliamentarian and admiral, was born at Bridgwater in Somersetshire. The day of his birth is not known, but he was baptized on the 27th of September 1599. Blake was the eldest son of a well-to-do merchant, and received his early education at the grammar school of Bridgwater. In 1615 he was sent to Oxford, entering at first St Alban’s Hall, but removing afterwards to Wadham College, then recently founded. He remained at the university till 1625, but failed to obtain any college preferment. Nothing is known of his life with certainty for the next fifteen years. An anonymous Dutch writer, in the Hollandische Mercurius (1652), represents him as saying that he had lived in Schiedam “for five or six years” in his youth. He doubtless engaged in trade, and apparently with success. When, after eleven years of kingship without parliaments, a parliament was summoned to meet in April 1640, Blake was elected to represent his native borough. This parliament, named “the Short,” was dissolved in three weeks, and the career of Blake as a politician was suspended. Two years later the inevitable conflict began. Blake declared for the Parliament, and served under Sir John Horner. In 1643 he was entrusted with the command of one of the forts of Bristol. This he stoutly held during the siege of the town by Prince Rupert, and earned the approval of parliament by refusing to surrender his post till duly informed of the capitulation. In 1644 he gained high distinction by the resolute defence of Lyme in Dorsetshire. The siege was raised on the 23rd of May, and on the 8th of July Blake took Taunton by surprise, and notwithstanding its imperfect defences and inadequate supplies, held the town for the Parliament against two sieges by the Royalists until July 1645, when it was relieved by Fairfax. In 1645 he re-entered parliament as member for Taunton, when the Royalist Colonel Windham was expelled.
BLAKE, ROBERT (1509-1657), an English politician and admiral, was born in Bridgwater, Somerset. The exact date of his birth isn’t known, but he was baptized on September 27, 1599. Blake was the eldest son of a prosperous merchant and received his early education at the grammar school in Bridgwater. In 1615, he was sent to Oxford, initially attending St Alban’s Hall before moving to Wadham College, which had just been established. He stayed at the university until 1625 but didn’t achieve any college honors. There’s little definitive information about his life for the next fifteen years. An anonymous Dutch writer in the Hollandische Mercurius (1652) claims that Blake said he lived in Schiedam “for five or six years” in his youth. He likely participated in trade and seemed to find some success. When, after eleven years of a monarchy without parliaments, a parliament was convened in April 1640, Blake was elected to represent his hometown. This parliament, known as “the Short,” was dissolved in three weeks, putting his political career on hold. Two years later, the expected conflict began. Blake sided with Parliament and served under Sir John Horner. In 1643, he was given command of one of the forts in Bristol. He held strong during the siege of the town by Prince Rupert and earned Parliament’s approval by refusing to surrender his position until officially informed of the town’s capitulation. In 1644, he gained significant recognition for his determined defense of Lyme in Dorset. The siege ended on May 23, and on July 8, Blake surprised Taunton and, despite its subpar defenses and limited supplies, held the town for Parliament against two sieges by the Royalists until July 1645, when it was relieved by Fairfax. In 1645, he returned to Parliament as a member for Taunton, replacing the expelled Royalist Colonel Windham.
He adhered to the Parliamentary party after the king’s death, and within a month (February 1649) was appointed, with Colonels Dean and Popham, to the command of the fleet, under the title of General of the Sea. In April he was sent in pursuit of Prince Rupert, who with the Royalist fleet had entered the harbour of Kinsale in Ireland. There he blockaded the prince for six months; and when the latter, in want of provisions, and hopeless of relief, succeeded in making his escape with the fleet and in reaching the Tagus, Blake followed him thither, and again blockaded him for some months. The king of Portugal refusing permission for Blake to attack his enemy, the latter made reprisals by falling on the Portuguese fleet, richly laden, returning from Brazil. He captured seventeen ships and burnt three, bringing his prizes home without molestation. After revictualling his fleet, he sailed again, captured a French man-of-war, and then pursued Prince Rupert, who had been asked to go away by the Portuguese and had entered the Mediterranean. In November 1650 Blake destroyed the bulk of the Royalist squadron near Cartagena. The thanks of parliament were voted to Blake, and he received a grant of £1000. He was continued in his office of admiral and general of the sea; and in May following he took, in conjunction with Ayscue, the Scilly Islands. For this service the thanks of parliament were again awarded him, and he was soon after made a member of the council of state.
He stayed loyal to the Parliamentary party after the king died, and within a month (February 1649), he was appointed, along with Colonels Dean and Popham, to command the fleet, taking on the title of General of the Sea. In April, he set out to track down Prince Rupert, who had entered the harbor of Kinsale in Ireland with the Royalist fleet. He blockaded the prince there for six months, and when Rupert, running low on supplies and without hope of rescue, managed to flee with his fleet to the Tagus, Blake followed him and blockaded him again for several months. When the king of Portugal denied Blake permission to attack Rupert, Blake retaliated by targeting the Portuguese fleet, which was heavily loaded with riches from Brazil. He captured seventeen ships and burned three, bringing his prizes home without any trouble. After restocking his fleet, he set sail again, captured a French warship, and pursued Prince Rupert, who had been asked to leave by the Portuguese and had entered the Mediterranean. In November 1650, Blake destroyed most of the Royalist squadron near Cartagena. Parliament voted to thank Blake for his efforts, and he received a grant of £1000. He continued in his role as admiral and general of the sea, and in May, he partnered with Ayscue to take the Scilly Islands. For this achievement, Parliament once again awarded him their thanks, and he was soon made a member of the council of state.
In 1652 war broke out with the Dutch, who had made great preparations for the conflict. In March the command of the fleet was given to Blake for nine months; and in the middle of May the Dutch fleet of forty-five ships, led by their great admiral Tromp, appeared in the Downs. Blake, who had only twenty ships, sailed to meet them, and the battle took place off Dover on the 19th of May. The Dutch were defeated in an engagement of four or five hours, lost two ships, and withdrew under cover of darkness. Attempts at accommodation were made by the states, but they failed. Early in July war was formally declared, 36 and in the same month Blake captured a large part of the Dutch fishery-fleet and the twelve men-of-war that formed their convoy. On the 28th of September Blake and Penn again encountered the Dutch fleet, now commanded by De Ruyter and De Witt, off the Kentish Knock, defeated it, and chased it for two days. The Dutch took refuge in Goree. A third battle was fought near the end of November. By this time the ships under Blake’s command had been reduced in number to forty, and nearly the half of these were useless for want of seamen. Tromp, who had been reinstated in command, appeared in the Downs, with a fleet of eighty ships besides ten fireships. Blake, nevertheless, risked a battle off Dungeness, but was defeated, and withdrew into the Thames. The English fleet having been refitted, put to sea again in February 1653; and on the 18th Blake, at the head of eighty ships, encountered Tromp in the Channel. The Dutch force, according to Clarendon, numbered 100 ships of war, but according to the official reports of the Dutch, only seventy. The battle was severe, and continued through three days, the Dutch, however, retreating, and taking refuge in the shallow waters off the French coast. In this action Blake was severely wounded. The three English admirals put to sea again in May; and on the 3rd and 4th of June another battle was fought near the North Foreland. On the first day Dean and Monk were repulsed by Tromp; but on the second day the scales were turned by the arrival of Blake, and the Dutch retreated to the Texel.
In 1652, war broke out with the Dutch, who had made extensive preparations for the conflict. In March, the command of the fleet was given to Blake for nine months, and in mid-May, the Dutch fleet of forty-five ships, led by their great admiral Tromp, appeared in the Downs. Blake, who had only twenty ships, sailed to confront them, and the battle took place off Dover on May 19th. The Dutch were defeated in a fight that lasted four or five hours, losing two ships and withdrawing under the cover of darkness. Efforts to negotiate peace were made by the states, but they failed. Early in July, war was officially declared, 36 and in the same month, Blake captured a significant portion of the Dutch fishery fleet and the twelve men-of-war that were escorting them. On September 28th, Blake and Penn encountered the Dutch fleet again, now commanded by De Ruyter and De Witt, off the Kentish Knock, defeated it, and chased it for two days. The Dutch took refuge in Goree. A third battle occurred near the end of November. By this time, the ships under Blake’s command had been reduced to forty, with nearly half of them unfit for battle due to a lack of crew. Tromp, who had regained command, appeared in the Downs with a fleet of eighty ships, plus ten fireships. Despite this, Blake took the risk of another battle off Dungeness, but was defeated and withdrew into the Thames. After the English fleet was refitted, it went back to sea in February 1653; on the 18th, Blake, leading eighty ships, faced Tromp in the Channel. The Dutch force, according to Clarendon, had 100 warships, but according to official Dutch reports, only seventy. The battle was intense, lasting three days; however, the Dutch retreated and sought shelter in the shallow waters off the French coast. During this battle, Blake was seriously wounded. The three English admirals went back to sea in May, and on June 3rd and 4th, another battle was fought near the North Foreland. On the first day, Dean and Monk were pushed back by Tromp; but on the second day, the arrival of Blake changed the tide, and the Dutch retreated to the Texel.
Ill-health now compelled Blake to retire from the service for a time, and he did not appear again on the seas for about eighteen months; meanwhile he sat as a member of the Little Parliament (Barebones’s). In November 1654 he was selected by Cromwell to conduct a fleet to the Mediterranean to exact compensation from the duke of Tuscany, the knights of Malta, and the piratical states of North Africa, for wrongs done to English merchants. This mission he executed with his accustomed spirit and with complete success. Tunis alone dared to resist his demands, and Tunis paid the penalty of the destruction of its two fortresses by English guns. In the winter of 1655-1656, war being declared against Spain, Blake was sent to cruise off Cadiz and the neighbouring coasts, to intercept the Spanish shipping. One of his captains captured a part of the Plate fleet in September 1656. In April 1657 Blake, then in very ill health, suffering from dropsy and scurvy, and anxious to have assistance in his arduous duties, heard that the Plate fleet lay at anchor in the bay of Santa Cruz, in the island of Teneriffe. The position was a very strong one, defended by a castle and several forts with guns. Under the shelter of these lay a fleet of sixteen ships drawn up in crescent order. Captain Stayner was ordered to enter the bay and fall on the fleet. This he did. Blake followed him. Broadsides were poured into the castle and the forts at the same time; and soon nothing was left but ruined walls and charred fragments of burnt ships. The wind was blowing hard into the bay; but suddenly, and fortunately for the heroic Blake, it shifted, and carried him safely out to sea. “The whole action,” says Clarendon, “was so incredible that all men who knew the place wondered that any sober man, with what courage soever endowed, would ever have undertaken it; and they could hardly persuade themselves to believe what they had done; while the Spaniards comforted themselves with the belief that they were devils and not men who had destroyed them in such a manner.” The English lost one ship and 200 men killed and wounded. The thanks of parliament were voted to officers and men; and a very costly jewel (diamond ring) was presented to Blake, “as a testimony,” says Cromwell in his letter of 10th June, “of our own and the parliament’s good acceptance of your carriage in this action.” “This was the last action of the brave Blake.”
Ill health forced Blake to take a break from service for a while, and he didn’t set sail again for about eighteen months. During that time, he was a member of the Little Parliament (Barebones’s). In November 1654, Cromwell chose him to lead a fleet to the Mediterranean to demand compensation from the Duke of Tuscany, the Knights of Malta, and the pirate states of North Africa for wrongs done to English merchants. He carried out this mission with his usual determination and achieved complete success. Only Tunis dared to resist his demands, and for that, Tunis faced the consequences, with its two fortresses being destroyed by English cannons. In the winter of 1655-1656, after war was declared against Spain, Blake was sent to patrol off Cadiz and the surrounding coasts to intercept Spanish shipping. One of his captains captured a portion of the Plate fleet in September 1656. In April 1657, Blake, who was in very poor health, suffering from dropsy and scurvy, and eager for support in his demanding duties, learned that the Plate fleet was anchored in the bay of Santa Cruz, in the island of Tenerife. The location was highly fortified, defended by a castle and several forts with cannons. Sheltered by these defenses was a fleet of sixteen ships arranged in a crescent formation. Captain Stayner was ordered to enter the bay and attack the fleet. He did just that, and Blake followed him. They unleashed broadsides on the castle and the forts simultaneously, and soon nothing was left but collapsed walls and burnt ship debris. The wind was strong and blowing into the bay, but then, luckily for the courageous Blake, it shifted and carried him safely out to sea. “The whole action,” says Clarendon, “was so incredible that everyone familiar with the place wondered how any sane person, regardless of courage, would ever have attempted it; and they could hardly believe what had happened; while the Spaniards consoled themselves with the belief that they were facing devils and not men who had destroyed them in such a way.” The English lost one ship and 200 men killed and wounded. Parliament expressed their gratitude to the officers and men, and a very expensive jewel (diamond ring) was presented to Blake, “as a testimony,” as Cromwell stated in his letter of June 10, “of our and the parliament’s high regard for your conduct in this action.” “This was the last action of the brave Blake.”
After again cruising for a time off Cadiz, his health failing more and more, he was compelled to make homewards before the summer was over. He died at sea, but within sight of Plymouth, on the 17th of August 1657. His body was brought to London and embalmed, and after lying in state at Greenwich House was interred with great pomp and solemnity in Westminster Abbey. In 1661 Charles II. ordered the exhumation of Blake’s body, with those of the mother and daughter of Cromwell and several others. They were cast out of the abbey, and were reburied in the churchyard of St Margaret’s. “But that regard,” says Johnson, “which was denied his body has been paid to his better remains, his name and his memory. Nor has any writer dared to deny him the praise of intrepidity, honesty, contempt of wealth, and love of his country.” Clarendon bears the following testimony to his excellence as a commander:—“He was the first man that declined the old track, and made it apparent that the science might be attained in less time than was imagined. He was the first man that brought ships to contemn castles on the shore, which had ever been thought very formidable, but were discovered by him to make a noise only, and to fright those who could be rarely hurt by them.”
After spending some time sailing near Cadiz, his health continued to decline, forcing him to head home before summer ended. He died at sea, but within sight of Plymouth, on August 17, 1657. His body was taken to London, embalmed, and after lying in state at Greenwich House, was buried with great ceremony in Westminster Abbey. In 1661, Charles II ordered the exhumation of Blake’s body, along with those of Cromwell’s mother and daughter, among others. They were removed from the abbey and reburied in the churchyard of St Margaret’s. “But that respect,” says Johnson, “which was denied his body has been paid to his better remains, his name and his memory. Nor has any writer dared to deny him the praise of courage, integrity, disdain for wealth, and love of his country.” Clarendon provides the following testimony to his skill as a commander: “He was the first man to break from the old ways, showing that the principles could be mastered in less time than previously thought. He was the first to demonstrate that ships could disregard coastal fortifications, which had always been seen as very formidable, but were revealed by him to make just a lot of noise and terrify those who could rarely be harmed by them.”
A life of Blake is included in the work entitled Lives, English and Foreign. Dr Johnson wrote a short life of him, and in 1852 appeared Hepworth Dixon’s fuller narrative, Robert Blake, Admiral and General at Sea. Much new matter for the biography of Blake will be found in the Letters and Papers Relating to the First Dutch War, edited by S.R. Gardiner for the Navy Records Society (1898-1899.)
A biography of Blake is found in the book titled Lives, English and Foreign. Dr. Johnson penned a brief biography of him, and in 1852, Hepworth Dixon released a more detailed account, Robert Blake, Admiral and General at Sea. Much new information about Blake's life is available in the Letters and Papers Relating to the First Dutch War, edited by S.R. Gardiner for the Navy Records Society (1898-1899).
BLAKE, WILLIAM (1757-1827), English poet and painter, was born in London, on the 28th of November 1757. His father, James Blake, kept a hosier’s shop in Broad Street, Golden Square; and from the scanty education which the young artist received, it may be judged that the circumstances of the family were not very prosperous. For the facts of William Blake’s early life the world is indebted to a little book, called A Father’s Memoirs on a Child, written by Dr Malkin in 1806. Here we learn that young Blake quickly developed a taste for design, which his father appears to have had sufficient intelligence to recognize and assist by every means in his power. At the age of ten the boy was sent to a drawing school kept by Henry Pars in the Strand, and at the same time he was already cultivating his own taste by constant attendance at the different art sale rooms, where he was known as the “little connoisseur.” Here he began to collect prints after Michelangelo, and Raphael, Dürer and Heemskerk, while at the school in the Strand he had the opportunity of drawing from the antique. After four years of this preliminary instruction Blake entered upon another branch of art study. In 1777 he was apprenticed to James Basire, an engraver of repute, and with him he remained seven years. His apprenticeship had an important bearing on Blake’s artistic education, and marks the department of art in which he was made technically proficient. In 1778, at the end of his apprenticeship, he proceeded to the school of the Royal Academy, where he continued his early study from the antique, and had for the first time an opportunity of drawing from the living model.
BLAKE, WILLIAM (1757-1827), English poet and painter, was born in London on November 28, 1757. His father, James Blake, ran a hosier’s shop in Broad Street, Golden Square, and from the limited education that the young artist received, it can be assumed that the family's situation was not very prosperous. For the details of William Blake’s early life, we owe much to a small book titled A Father’s Memoirs on a Child, written by Dr. Malkin in 1806. Here, we learn that young Blake quickly developed a flair for design, which his father seemed to recognize and supported by all means possible. At ten years old, the boy was sent to a drawing school run by Henry Pars in the Strand, while simultaneously nurturing his own taste by frequently visiting various art auction houses, where he earned the nickname “little connoisseur.” There, he started to collect prints after Michelangelo, Raphael, Dürer, and Heemskerk, and at the school in the Strand, he had the chance to draw from classical sculptures. After four years of this foundational training, Blake moved on to another area of art study. In 1777, he became an apprentice to James Basire, a well-known engraver, and he stayed with him for seven years. This apprenticeship was crucial for Blake’s artistic development and established the area of art in which he gained technical skills. In 1778, after completing his apprenticeship, he went to the Royal Academy school, where he continued his early studies from classical sources and got the opportunity to draw from live models for the first time.
This is in brief all that is known of Blake’s artistic education. That he ever, at the academy or elsewhere, systematically studied painting we do not know; but that he had already begun the practice of water colour for himself is ascertained. So far, however, the course of his training in art schools, and under Basire, was calculated to render him proficient only as a draughtsman and an engraver. He had learned how to draw, and he had mastered besides the practical difficulties of engraving, and with these qualifications he entered upon his career. In 1780 he exhibited a picture in the Royal Academy Exhibition, conjectured to have been executed in water colours, and he continued to contribute to the annual exhibitions up to the year 1808. In 1782 he married Catherine Boucher, the daughter of a market-gardener at Battersea, with whom he lived always on affectionate terms, and the young couple after their marriage established themselves in Green Street, Leicester Fields. Blake had already become acquainted with some of the rising artists of his time, amongst them Stothard, Flaxman and Fuseli, and he now began to see something of literary society. At the house of the Rev. Henry Mathew, in Rathbone Place, he used to recite and sometimes to sing poems of his own composition, and it was through the influence of this gentleman, combined with that of Flaxman, that Blake’s first volume of poetry was printed and published in 1783. From this time forward the artist came before the world in a double capacity. By education as well as native 37 talent, he was pledged to the life of a painter, and these Poetical Sketches, though they are often no more than the utterances of a boy, are no less decisive in marking Blake as a future poet.
This is a brief summary of what we know about Blake’s artistic education. It's unclear if he ever studied painting systematically at an academy or elsewhere, but it's certain that he started practicing watercolors on his own. However, the training he received in art schools and under Basire mainly prepared him to be a skilled draughtsman and engraver. He learned how to draw and overcame the practical challenges of engraving, and with these skills, he began his career. In 1780, he displayed a painting at the Royal Academy Exhibition, which was believed to be done in watercolors, and he continued to participate in the annual exhibitions until 1808. In 1782, he married Catherine Boucher, the daughter of a market gardener from Battersea, and they lived together on affectionate terms. After their marriage, the couple settled in Green Street, Leicester Fields. Blake had already met some of the emerging artists of his time, including Stothard, Flaxman, and Fuseli, and he began to engage with literary society. At the home of Rev. Henry Mathew in Rathbone Place, he would recite and sometimes sing his own poems, and it was through Mathew’s influence, along with Flaxman's, that Blake’s first volume of poetry was printed and published in 1783. From that point on, the artist presented himself to the world in two roles. Both through education and natural talent, he was committed to the life of a painter, and these Poetical Sketches, though often the expressions of a young man, clearly indicate that Blake was destined to become a significant poet.
For a while the two gifts are exhibited in association. To the close of his life Blake continued to print and publish, after a manner of his own, the inventions of his verse illustrated by original designs, but there is a certain period in his career when the union of the two gifts is peculiarly close, and when their service to one another is unquestionable. In 1784 Blake, moving from Green Street, set up in company with a fellow-pupil, Parker, as print-seller and engraver next to his father’s house in Broad Street, Golden Square, but in 1787 this partnership was severed, and he established an independent business in Poland Street. It was from this house, and in 1787, that the Songs of Innocence were published, a work that must always be remarkable for beauty both of verse and of design, as well as for the singular method by which the two were combined and expressed by the artist. Blake became in fact his own printer and publisher. He engraved upon copper, by a process devised by himself, both the text of his poems and the surrounding decorative design, and to the pages printed from the copper plates an appropriate colouring was afterwards added by hand. The poetic genius already discernible in the first volume of Poetical Sketches is here more decisively expressed, and some of the songs in this volume deserve to take rank with the best things of their kind in our literature. In an age of enfeebled poetic style, when Wordsworth, with more weighty apparatus, had as yet scarcely begun his reform of English versification, Blake, unaided by any contemporary influence, produced a work of fresh and living beauty; and if the Songs of Innocence established Blake’s claim to the title of poet, the setting in which they were given to the world proved that he was also something more. For the full development of his artistic powers we have to wait till a later date, but here at least he exhibits a just and original understanding of the sources of decorative beauty. Each page of these poems is a study of design, full of invention, and often wrought with the utmost delicacy of workmanship. The artist retained to the end this feeling for decorative effect; but as time went on, he considerably enlarged the imaginative scope of his work, and decoration then became the condition rather than the aim of his labour.
For a while, the two talents are showcased together. Throughout his life, Blake kept printing and publishing, in his unique style, the ideas of his poems illustrated with original designs. However, there’s a specific time in his career when the combination of both talents is especially strong, and their contribution to one another is clear. In 1784, Blake moved from Green Street and partnered with a fellow student, Parker, setting up as a print seller and engraver next to his father's house on Broad Street, Golden Square. But in 1787, this partnership ended, and he started his own business on Poland Street. It was from this location, in 1787, that the Songs of Innocence were published, a work that stands out for its beauty in both verse and design, as well as for the unique way the two were blended and presented by the artist. Blake essentially became his own printer and publisher. He engraved the text of his poems and the accompanying decorative design onto copper using a method he invented, and then he added appropriate coloring by hand to the pages printed from the copper plates. The poetic talent seen in the first volume of Poetical Sketches is expressed even more clearly here, and some of the songs in this volume rank among the best in our literature. At a time when poetic style was weakened, and when Wordsworth, with his heavier style, had barely begun his reform of English poetry, Blake, without any contemporary influence, created a work of fresh and vibrant beauty. If the Songs of Innocence established Blake’s reputation as a poet, the way they were introduced to the world showed that he was something even greater. We will have to wait for a later time to see the full development of his artistic abilities, but here he demonstrates a keen and original understanding of the sources of decorative beauty. Each page of these poems is a design study, full of inventive ideas, often crafted with great delicacy. The artist maintained this sense of decorative effect until the end, but as time continued, he significantly expanded the imaginative scope of his work, transforming decoration from being the goal to a condition of his creation.
Notwithstanding the distinct and precious qualities of this volume, it attracted but slight attention, a fact perhaps not very wonderful, when the system of publication is taken into account. Blake, however, proceeded with other work of the same kind. The same year he published The Book of Thel, more decidedly mystic in its poetry, but scarcely less beautiful as a piece of illumination; The Marriage of Heaven and Hell followed in 1790; and in 1793 there are added The Gates of Paradise, The Vision of the Daughters of Albion, and some other “Prophetic Books.” It becomes abundantly clear on reaching this point in his career that Blake’s utterances cannot be judged by ordinary rules. The Songs of Experience, put forth in 1794 as a companion to the earlier Songs of Innocence, are for the most part intelligible and coherent, but in these intervening works of prophecy, as they were called by the author, we get the first public expression of that phase of his character and of his genius upon which a charge of insanity has been founded. The question whether Blake was or was not mad seems likely to remain in dispute, but there can be no doubt whatever that he was at different periods of his life under the influence of illusions for which there are no outward facts to account, and that much of what he wrote is so far wanting in the quality of sanity as to be without a logical coherence. On the other hand, it is equally clear that no madness imputed to Blake could equal that which would be involved in the rejection of his work on this ground. The greatness of Blake’s mind is even better established than its frailty, and in considering the work that he has left we must remember that it is by the sublimity of his genius, and not by any mental defect, that he is most clearly distinguished from his fellows. With the publication of the Songs of Experience Blake’s poetic career, so far at least as ordinary readers are concerned, may be said to close. A writer of prophecy he continued for many years, but the works by which he is best known in poetry are those earlier and simpler efforts, supplemented by a few pieces taken from various sources, some of which were of later production. But although Blake the poet ceases in a general sense at this date, Blake the artist is only just entering upon his career. In the Songs of Innocence and Experience, and even in some of the earlier Books of Prophecy, the two gifts worked together in perfect balance and harmony; but at this point the supremacy of the artistic faculty asserts itself, and for the remainder of his life Blake was pre-eminently a designer and engraver. The labour of poetical composition continues, but the product passes beyond the range of general comprehension; while, with apparent inconsistency, the work of the artist gains steadily in strength and coherence, and never to the last loses its hold upon the understanding. It may almost be said without exaggeration that his earliest poetic work, The Songs of Innocence, and nearly his latest effort in design, the illustrations to The Book of Job, take rank among the sanest and most admirable products of his genius. Nor is the fact, astonishing enough at first sight, quite beyond a possible explanation. As Blake advanced in his poetic career, he was gradually hindered and finally overpowered by a tendency that was most serviceable to him in design. His inclination to substitute a symbol for a conception, to make an image do duty for an idea, became an insuperable obstacle to literary success. He endeavoured constantly to treat the intellectual material of verse as if it could be moulded into sensuous form, with the inevitable result that as the ideas to be expressed advanced in complexity and depth of meaning, his poetic gifts became gradually more inadequate to the task of interpretation. The earlier poems dealing with simpler themes, and put forward at a time when the bent of the artist’s mind was not strictly determined, do not suffer from this difficulty; the symbolism then only enriches an idea of no intellectual intricacy; but when Blake began to concern himself with profounder problems the want of a more logical understanding of language made itself strikingly apparent. If his ways of thought and modes of workmanship had not been developed with an intensity almost morbid, he would probably have been able to distinguish and keep separate the double functions of art and literature. As it is, however, he remains as an extreme illustration of the ascendancy of the artistic faculty. For this tendency to translate ideas into image, and to find for every thought, however simple or sublime, a precise and sensuous form, is of the essence of pure artistic invention. If this be accepted as the dominant bent of Blake’s genius, it is not so wonderful that his work in art should have strengthened in proportion as his poetic powers waned; but whether the explanation satisfies all the requirements of the case or not, the fact remains, and cannot be overlooked by any student of Blake’s career.
Despite the unique and valuable qualities of this volume, it garnered only a little attention, which isn't surprising when you consider the publishing system. Blake, however, continued with similar work. That same year he released The Book of Thel, which was even more mystic in its poetry but still beautiful in its illumination; The Marriage of Heaven and Hell followed in 1790; and in 1793 he added The Gates of Paradise, The Vision of the Daughters of Albion, and some other "Prophetic Books." It's clear by this point in his career that Blake's expressions can't be evaluated by standard criteria. The Songs of Experience, published in 1794 as a companion to the earlier Songs of Innocence, are mostly clear and coherent, but in these intervening prophetic works—so called by the author—we see the first public displays of that side of his character and genius that led some to label him insane. The debate over whether Blake was mad seems likely to continue, but there's no denying that at various times in his life, he experienced illusions without any external evidence, and much of what he created lacks the quality of rational coherence. Conversely, it's also clear that no assumption of madness associated with Blake could compare to the madness of dismissing his work on that basis. The greatness of Blake's mind is more firmly established than its weaknesses, and when we look at his work, we should remember that it is the brilliance of his genius, rather than any mental flaw, that sets him apart from others. With the release of the Songs of Experience, Blake’s poetic career, at least for most average readers, can be seen as ending. He continued writing prophetic works for many years, but the pieces by which he is most widely known in poetry are those earlier and simpler creations, along with a few selected from various sources, some composed later. However, while Blake the poet seems to conclude around this time, Blake the artist is just beginning his journey. In the Songs of Innocence and Experience, and even in some of his early Books of Prophecy, the two talents worked together in perfect harmony; but at this juncture, the dominance of his artistic skill emerges, and for the rest of his life, Blake was primarily a designer and engraver. The effort of poetic writing continues, but the results move beyond general understanding; while, oddly enough, the artistic work steadily gains in strength and coherence and never loses its connection to comprehension. One might almost say without exaggeration that his earliest poetic work, The Songs of Innocence, and nearly his last effort in design, the illustrations for The Book of Job, rank among the sanest and most admirable products of his genius. The fact, which seems surprising at first glance, can be reasonably explained. As Blake progressed in his poetic career, he was increasingly hindered and ultimately overwhelmed by a tendency that served him well in his design work. His inclination to replace a concept with a symbol, to let an image represent an idea, became a significant barrier to literary success. He constantly tried to shape the intellectual material of poetry as if it could be molded into a tangible form, leading to the inevitable conclusion that as the ideas he aimed to portray grew in complexity and depth, his poetic abilities became increasingly insufficient for the task. The earlier poems, which addressed simpler themes and were produced when the artist's mindset was not yet clearly defined, do not suffer from this challenge; the symbolism then merely added richness to straightforward ideas. But when Blake started to tackle more profound issues, the lack of a clearer grasp of language became strikingly obvious. If his thinking and methods of working hadn't developed with almost obsessive intensity, he might have been able to separate and distinguish the dual functions of art and literature. As it stands, however, he remains a strong example of the dominance of the artistic talent. This tendency to convert ideas into images and to find a specific and tangible form for every thought, regardless of its simplicity or grandeur, is at the heart of true artistic creation. If we accept this as the primary aspect of Blake’s genius, it’s not surprising that his artistic work strengthened as his poetic abilities declined; yet, whether this explanation meets all aspects of the situation or not, the fact remains and cannot be overlooked by anyone studying Blake’s career.
In 1796 Blake was actively employed in the work of illustration. Edwards, a bookseller of New Bond Street, projected a new edition of Young’s Night Thoughts, and Blake was chosen to illustrate the work. It was to have been issued in parts, but for some reason not very clear the enterprise failed, and only a first part, including forty-three designs, was given to the world. These designs were engraved by Blake himself, and they are interesting not only for their own merit but for the peculiar system by which the illustration has been associated with the text. It was afterwards discovered that the artist had executed original designs in water-colour for the whole series, and these drawings, 537 in number, form one of the most interesting records of Blake’s genius. Gilchrist, the painter’s biographer, in commenting upon the engraved plates, regrets the absence of colour, “the use of which Blake so well understood, to relieve his simple design and give it significance,” and an examination of the original water-colour drawings fully supports the justice of his criticism. Soon after the publication of this work Blake was introduced by Flaxman to the poet Hayley, and in the year 1801 he accepted the suggestion of the latter, that he should take up his residence at Felpham in Sussex. The mild and 38 amiable poet had planned to write a life of Cowper, and for the illustration of this and other works he sought Blake’s help and companionship. The residence at Felpham continued for three years, partly pleasant and partly irksome to Blake, but apparently not very profitable to the progress of his art. One of the annoyances of his stay was a malicious prosecution for treason set on foot by a common soldier whom Blake had summarily ejected from his garden; but a more serious drawback was the increasing irritation which the painter seems to have experienced from association with Hayley. In 1804 Blake returned to London, to take up his residence in South Moulton Street, and as the fruit of his residence in Felpham, he published, in the manner already described, the prophetic books called the Jerusalem, The Emanation of the Giant Albion, and Milton. The first of these is a very notable performance in regard to artistic invention. Many of the designs stand out from the text in complete independence, and are now and then of the very finest quality.
In 1796, Blake was actively working on illustrations. Edwards, a bookseller on New Bond Street, planned a new edition of Young’s Night Thoughts, and Blake was selected to illustrate it. It was supposed to be released in parts, but for some unclear reason, the project failed, and only the first part, which included forty-three designs, was published. Blake engraved these designs himself, and they are significant not only for their artistic quality but also for the unique way the illustrations were connected to the text. It was later found that the artist had created original water-color designs for the entire series, totaling 537 drawings, which provide an intriguing record of Blake's genius. Gilchrist, Blake's biographer, commented on the engraved plates and regretted the lack of color, noting that “the use of which Blake so well understood, to relieve his simple design and give it significance,” and an analysis of the original water-color drawings confirms the validity of his critique. Soon after publishing this work, Blake was introduced to the poet Hayley by Flaxman, and in 1801, he agreed to Hayley's suggestion to move to Felpham in Sussex. The gentle and kind poet intended to write a biography of Cowper, and sought Blake’s help and companionship for illustrations of this and other works. Blake's time in Felpham lasted three years, marked by a mix of pleasant and frustrating moments, but it didn’t seem to benefit his artistic progress much. One annoyance was a malicious treason charge filed against him by a soldier whom Blake had removed from his garden; however, a more severe issue was the increasing frustration Blake felt from his association with Hayley. In 1804, Blake moved back to London, settling on South Moulton Street, and as a result of his time in Felpham, he published, in the previously described manner, his prophetic books titled Jerusalem, The Emanation of the Giant Albion, and Milton. The first of these is particularly noteworthy for its artistic innovation. Many of the designs exist independently from the text and are occasionally of the highest quality.
In the years 1804-1805 Blake executed a series of designs in illustration of Robert Blair’s The Grave, of much beauty and grandeur, though showing stronger traces of imitation of Italian art than any earlier production. These designs were purchased from the artist by an adventurous and unscrupulous publisher, Cromek, for the paltry sum of £21, and afterwards published in a series of engravings by Schiavonetti. Despite the ill treatment Blake received in the matter, and the other evils, including a quarrel with his friend Stothard as to priority of invention of a design illustrating the Canterbury Pilgrims, which his association with Cromek involved, the book gained for him a larger amount of popularity than he at any other time secured. Stothard’s picture of the Canterbury Pilgrims was exhibited in 1807, and in 1809 Blake, in emulation of his rival’s success, having himself painted in water-colour a picture of the same subject, opened an exhibition, and drew up a Descriptive Catalogue, curious and interesting, and containing a very valuable criticism of Chaucer.
In the years 1804-1805, Blake created a series of stunning designs for Robert Blair’s The Grave, which were notably influenced by Italian art more than any of his earlier works. These designs were bought from him by a daring and unscrupulous publisher, Cromek, for a meager £21, and later published as engravings by Schiavonetti. Despite the mistreatment Blake faced in this situation, along with other issues like a dispute with his friend Stothard over who came up with the idea for a design depicting the Canterbury Pilgrims—a conflict that arose from his association with Cromek—the book brought him more popularity than he had ever experienced before. Stothard’s painting of the Canterbury Pilgrims was displayed in 1807, and in 1809, in a bid to rival his competitor’s success, Blake painted his own watercolor of the same theme, opened an exhibition, and created a Descriptive Catalogue that was both curious and interesting, featuring valuable criticism of Chaucer.
The remainder of the artist’s life is not outwardly eventful. In 1813 he formed, through the introduction of George Cumberland of Bristol, a valuable friendship with John Linnell and other rising water-colour painters. Amongst the group Blake seems to have found special sympathy in the society of John Varley, who, himself addicted to astrology, encouraged Blake to cultivate his gift of inspired vision; and it is probably to this influence that we are indebted for several curious drawings made from visions, especially the celebrated “ghost of a flea” and the very humorous portrait of the builder of the Pyramids. In 1821 Blake removed to Fountain Court, in the Strand, where he died on the 12th of August 1827. The chief work of these last years was the splendid series of engraved designs in illustration of the book of Job. Here we find the highest imaginative qualities of Blake’s art united to the technical means of expression which he best understood. Both the invention and the engraving are in all ways remarkable, and the series may fairly be cited in support of a very high estimate of his genius. None of his works is without the trace of that peculiar artistic instinct and power which seizes the pictorial element of ideas, simple or sublime, and translates them into the appropriate language of sense; but here the double faculty finds the happiest exercise. The grandeur of the theme is duly reflected in the simple and sublime images of the artist’s design, and in the presence of these plates we are made to feel the power of the artist over the expressional resources of human form, as well as his sympathy with the imaginative significance of his subject.
The rest of the artist’s life isn’t particularly eventful. In 1813, thanks to the introduction from George Cumberland of Bristol, he formed a valuable friendship with John Linnell and other emerging watercolor painters. Within this group, Blake seemed to connect especially well with John Varley, who was interested in astrology and encouraged Blake to nurture his talent for visionary inspiration. It’s likely due to this influence that we have several intriguing drawings based on visions, including the famous “ghost of a flea” and the very funny portrait of the builder of the Pyramids. In 1821, Blake moved to Fountain Court in the Strand, where he died on August 12, 1827. The major work from these last years was the impressive series of engraved designs illustrating the Book of Job. Here, we see the peak of Blake’s imaginative qualities combined with the technical skills he knew best. Both the creativity and the engraving are outstanding, and this series can rightly be used to support a very high appreciation of his genius. None of his works lacks that unique artistic instinct and ability that captures the visual element of ideas, whether simple or profound, and translates them into a fitting sensory language; but here, this dual talent finds its best expression. The grandeur of the theme is beautifully reflected in the simple yet sublime images of the artist's design, and when viewing these plates, we can truly appreciate the artist’s mastery of human form and his deep connection to the imaginative essence of his subject.
A life of Blake, with selections from his works, by Alexander Gilchrist, was published in 1863 (new edition by W.G. Robertson, 1906); in 1868 A.C. Swinburne published a critical essay on his genius, remarkable for a full examination of the Prophetic Books, and in 1874 William Michael Rossetti published a memoir prefixed to an edition of the poems. In 1893 appeared The Works of William Blake, edited by E.J. Ellis and W.B. Yeats. But for a long time all the editors paid too little attention to a correct following of Blake’s own MSS. The text of the poems was finally edited with exemplary care and thoroughness by John Sampson in his edition of the Poetical Works (1905), which has rescued Blake from the “improvements” of previous editors. See also The Letters of William Blake, together with a Life by Frederick Tatham; edited by A.G.B. Russell (1906); and Basil de Selincourt, William Blake (1909).
A life of Blake, with selections from his works, by Alexander Gilchrist, was published in 1863 (new edition by W.G. Robertson, 1906); in 1868, A.C. Swinburne released a critical essay on his genius, notable for its thorough examination of the Prophetic Books. In 1874, William Michael Rossetti published a memoir that preceded an edition of the poems. In 1893, The Works of William Blake, edited by E.J. Ellis and W.B. Yeats, was released. However, for a long time, all the editors paid too little attention to accurately following Blake’s own manuscripts. The poems’ text was finally edited with outstanding care and thoroughness by John Sampson in his edition of the Poetical Works (1905), which has saved Blake from the “improvements” of earlier editors. See also The Letters of William Blake, together with a Life by Frederick Tatham; edited by A.G.B. Russell (1906); and Basil de Selincourt, William Blake (1909).
BLAKELOCK, RALPH ALBERT (1847- ), American painter, was born in New York, on the 15th of October, 1847. He graduated at the College of the City of New York in 1867. In art he was self-taught and markedly original. Until ill-health necessitated the abandonment of his profession, he was a most prolific worker, his subjects including pictures of North American Indian life, and landscapes—notably such canvases as “The Indian Fisherman”; “Ta-wo-koka: or Circle Dance”; “Silvery Moonlight”; “A Waterfall by Moonlight”; “Solitude”; and “Moonlight on Long Island Sound.”
BLAKELOCK, RALPH ALBERT (1847- ), American painter, was born in New York on October 15, 1847. He graduated from the College of the City of New York in 1867. He was self-taught in art and had a unique style. Until he had to give up his career due to health issues, he was a very productive artist, with his works featuring North American Indian life and landscapes, including pieces like “The Indian Fisherman,” “Ta-wo-koka: or Circle Dance,” “Silvery Moonlight,” “A Waterfall by Moonlight,” “Solitude,” and “Moonlight on Long Island Sound.”
BLAKENEY, WILLIAM BLAKENEY, Baron (1672-1761), British soldier, was born at Mount Blakeney in Limerick in 1672. Destined by his father for politics, he soon showed a decided preference for a military career, and at the age of eighteen headed the tenants in defending the Blakeney estate against the Rapparees. As a volunteer he went to the war in Flanders, and at the siege of Venlo in 1702 won his commission. He served as a subaltern throughout Marlborough’s campaigns, and is said to have been the first to drill troops by signal of drum or colour. For many years after the peace of Utrecht he served unnoticed, and was sixty-five years of age before he became a colonel. This neglect, which was said to be due to the hostility of Lord Verney, ceased when the duke of Richmond was appointed colonel of Blakeney’s regiment, and thenceforward his advance was rapid. Brigadier-general in the Cartagena expedition of 1741, and major-general a little later, he distinguished himself by his gallant and successful defence of Stirling Castle against the Highlanders in 1745. Two years later George II. made him lieutenant-general and lieutenant-governor of Minorca. The governor of that island never set foot in it, and Blakeney was left in command for ten years.
BLAKENEY, WILLIAM BLAKENEY, Baron (1672-1761), British soldier, was born at Mount Blakeney in Limerick in 1672. Although his father intended for him to pursue a career in politics, he quickly showed a strong preference for the military, and by the age of eighteen, he led the tenants in defending the Blakeney estate against the Rapparees. As a volunteer, he joined the war in Flanders, and during the siege of Venlo in 1702, he earned his commission. He served as a junior officer throughout Marlborough’s campaigns and is said to have been the first to train troops using signals from drums or colors. For many years after the peace of Utrecht, he served without much recognition, and he didn't become a colonel until he was sixty-five years old. This oversight, believed to be caused by Lord Verney’s hostility, ended when the Duke of Richmond was appointed as the colonel of Blakeney’s regiment, leading to a quick advancement in his career. He became a brigadier-general during the Cartagena expedition of 1741 and was made a major-general shortly afterward, distinguishing himself with his brave and successful defense of Stirling Castle against the Highlanders in 1745. Two years later, George II appointed him as lieutenant-general and lieutenant-governor of Minorca. The governor of the island never set foot there, leaving Blakeney in command for ten years.
In 1756 the Seven Years’ War was preluded by a swift descent of the French on Minorca. Fifteen thousand troops under marshal the duc de Richelieu, escorted by a strong squadron under the marquis de la Gallisonnière, landed on the island on the 18th of April, and at once began the siege of Fort St Philip, where Blakeney commanded at most some 5000 soldiers and workmen. The defence, in spite of crumbling walls and rotted gun platforms, had already lasted a month when a British fleet under vice-admiral the Hon. John Byng appeared. La Gallisonnière and Byng fought, on the 20th of May, an indecisive battle, after which the relieving squadron sailed away and Blakeney was left to his fate. A second expedition subsequently appeared off Minorca, but it was then too late, for after a heroic resistance of seventy-one days the old general had been compelled to surrender the fort to Richelieu (April 18-June 28, 1756). Only the ruined fortifications were the prize of the victors. Blakeney and his little garrison were transported to Gibraltar with absolute liberty to serve again. Byng was tried and executed; Blakeney, on his return to England, found himself the hero of the nation. Rewards came freely to the veteran. He was made colonel of the Enniskillen regiment of infantry, knight of the Bath, and Baron Blakeney of Mount Blakeney in the Irish peerage. A little later Van Most’s statue of him was erected in Dublin, and his popularity continued unabated for the short remainder of his life. He died on the 20th of September 1761, and was buried in Westminster Abbey.
In 1756, the Seven Years' War began with a rapid attack by the French on Minorca. Fifteen thousand troops led by Marshal the Duc de Richelieu, accompanied by a strong squadron under the Marquis de la Gallisonnière, landed on the island on April 18 and immediately started the siege of Fort St. Philip, where Blakeney was in charge of around 5,000 soldiers and workers. Despite the crumbling walls and decaying gun platforms, the defense had held for a month when a British fleet arrived under Vice-Admiral the Hon. John Byng. On May 20, La Gallisonnière and Byng engaged in an inconclusive battle, after which the British squadron sailed away, leaving Blakeney to face his fate. A second expedition later showed up off Minorca, but it was too late; after a brave resistance lasting seventy-one days, the old general was forced to surrender the fort to Richelieu (April 18-June 28, 1756). Only the ruined fortifications were the spoils for the victors. Blakeney and his small garrison were taken to Gibraltar with full freedom to serve again. Byng was tried and executed; upon his return to England, Blakeney found himself celebrated as a national hero. Rewards flowed in for the veteran. He was appointed colonel of the Enniskillen regiment of infantry, knighted in the Order of the Bath, and made Baron Blakeney of Mount Blakeney in the Irish peerage. Soon after, a statue of him was erected by Van Most in Dublin, and his popularity remained strong for the brief remainder of his life. He died on September 20, 1761, and was buried in Westminster Abbey.
See Memoirs of General William Blakeney (1757).
See Memoirs of General William Blakeney (1757).
BLAKESLEY, JOSEPH WILLIAMS (1808-1885), English divine, was born in London on the 6th of March 1808, and was educated at St Paul’s school, London, and at Corpus Christi and Trinity Colleges, Cambridge. In 1831 he was elected a fellow, and in 1839 a tutor of Trinity. In 1833 he took holy orders, and from 1845 to 1872 held the college living of Ware, Hertfordshire. Over the signature “Hertfordshire Incumbent” he contributed a large number of letters to The Times on the leading social and political subjects of the day, and he also wrote many reviews of books for that paper. In 1863 he was made a canon of Canterbury, and in 1872 dean of Lincoln. Dean Blakesley was the 39 author of the first English Life of Aristotle (1839), an edition of Herodotus (1852-1854) in the Bibliotheca Classica, and Four Months in Algeria (1859). He died on the 18th of April 1885.
BLAKESLEY, JOSEPH WILLIAMS (1808-1885), an English clergyman, was born in London on March 6, 1808. He was educated at St Paul’s School in London and at Corpus Christi and Trinity Colleges, Cambridge. In 1831, he was elected as a fellow, and in 1839, he became a tutor at Trinity. He took holy orders in 1833 and served as the college living of Ware, Hertfordshire, from 1845 to 1872. Under the signature “Hertfordshire Incumbent,” he contributed a significant number of letters to The Times on key social and political issues of his time, as well as writing many book reviews for the paper. In 1863, he became a canon of Canterbury, and in 1872, he was appointed dean of Lincoln. Dean Blakesley was the 39 author of the first English Life of Aristotle (1839), an edition of Herodotus (1852-1854) in the Bibliotheca Classica, and Four Months in Algeria (1859). He passed away on April 18, 1885.
BLAMIRE, SUSANNA (1747-1794), English poet, daughter of a Cumberland yeoman, was born at Cardew Hall, near Dalston, in January 1747. Her mother died while she was a child, and she was brought up by her aunt, a Mrs Simpson of Thackwood, who sent her niece to the village school at Raughton Head. Susanna Blamire’s earliest poem is “Written in a Churchyard, on seeing a number of cattle grazing,” in imitation of Gray. She lived an uneventful life among the farmers of the neighbourhood, and her gaiety and good-humour made her a favourite in rustic society. In 1767 her elder sister Sarah married Colonel Graham of Gartmore. “An Epistle to her friends at Gartmore” gives a playful description of the monotonous simplicity of her life. To her Perthshire visits her songs in the Scottish vernacular are no doubt partly due. Her chief friend was Catharine Gilpin of Scaleby Castle. The two ladies spent the winters together in Carlisle, and wrote poems in common. Susanna Blamire died in Carlisle on the 5th of April 1794. The poems which were not collected during her lifetime, were first published in 1842 by Henry Lonsdale as The Poetical Works of Miss Susanna Blamire, “the Muse of Cumberland,” with a memoir by Mr Patrick Maxwell. Some of her songs rank among the very best of north-country lyrics. “And ye shall walk in silk attire” and “What ails this heart o’ mine,” are well known, and were included in Johnson’s Scots’ Musical Museum.
BLAMIRE, SUSANNA (1747-1794), English poet, daughter of a Cumberland farmer, was born at Cardew Hall, near Dalston, in January 1747. Her mother passed away when she was a child, and she was raised by her aunt, Mrs. Simpson of Thackwood, who sent her to the village school at Raughton Head. Susanna Blamire’s earliest poem is “Written in a Churchyard, on seeing a number of cattle grazing,” which imitates Gray. She led a quiet life among the local farmers, and her cheerfulness and good nature made her a favorite in rural society. In 1767, her older sister Sarah married Colonel Graham of Gartmore. “An Epistle to her friends at Gartmore” offers a light-hearted look at the simple routine of her life. Her visits to Perthshire likely inspired her songs in the Scottish dialect. Her closest friend was Catharine Gilpin of Scaleby Castle. The two women spent their winters together in Carlisle, collaborating on poems. Susanna Blamire passed away in Carlisle on April 5, 1794. The poems that weren’t published during her lifetime were first released in 1842 by Henry Lonsdale as The Poetical Works of Miss Susanna Blamire, “the Muse of Cumberland,” with a memoir by Mr. Patrick Maxwell. Some of her songs are among the best of northern lyrics. “And ye shall walk in silk attire” and “What ails this heart o’ mine” are well-known and were included in Johnson’s Scots’ Musical Museum.
BLANC, (Jean Joseph Charles) LOUIS (1811-1882), French politician and historian, was born on the 29th of October 1811 at Madrid, where his father held the post of inspector-general of finance under Joseph Bonaparte. Failing to receive aid from Pozzo di Borgo, his mother’s uncle, Louis Blanc studied law in Paris, living in poverty, and became a contributor to various journals. In the Revue du progrès, which he founded, he published in 1839 his study on L’Organisation du travail. The principles laid down in this famous essay form the key to Louis Blanc’s whole political career. He attributes all the evils that afflict society to the pressure of competition, whereby the weaker are driven to the wall. He demanded the equalization of wages, and the merging of personal interests in the common good—“à chacun selon ses besoins, de chacun selon ses facultés.” This was to be effected by the establishment of “social workshops,” a sort of combined co-operative society and trade-union, where the workmen in each trade were to unite their efforts for their common benefit. In 1841 he published his Histoire de dix ans 1830-1840, an attack upon the monarchy of July. It ran through four editions in four years.
BLANC, (Jean Joseph Charles) LOUIS (1811-1882), French politician and historian, was born on October 29, 1811, in Madrid, where his father was the inspector-general of finance under Joseph Bonaparte. After failing to get help from Pozzo di Borgo, his mother's uncle, Louis Blanc studied law in Paris while living in poverty and contributed to several journals. In the Revue du progrès, which he founded, he published his study on L’Organisation du travail in 1839. The principles established in this well-known essay are central to Louis Blanc’s entire political career. He blamed all the problems in society on the pressures of competition, which push the weaker individuals to the margins. He called for equal wages and merging personal interests with the common good—“à chacun selon ses besoins, de chacun selon ses facultés.” This would be achieved through the creation of “social workshops,” a type of cooperative society and trade union where workers in each trade would come together for their mutual benefit. In 1841, he published his Histoire de dix ans 1830-1840, which criticized the July monarchy. It went through four editions in four years.
In 1847 he published the two first volumes of his Histoire de la Revolution Française. Its publication was interrupted by the revolution of 1848, when Louis Blanc became a member of the provisional government. It was on his motion that, on the 25th of February, the government undertook “to guarantee the existence of the workmen by work”; and though his demand for the establishment of a ministry of labour was refused—as beyond the competence of a provisional government—he was appointed to preside over the government labour commission (Commission du Gouvernement pour les travailleurs) established at the Luxembourg to inquire into and report on the labour question. On the 10th of May he renewed, in the National Assembly, his proposal for a ministry of labour, but the temper of the majority was hostile to socialism, and the proposal was again rejected. His responsibility for the disastrous experiment of the national workshops he himself denied in his Appel aux honnêtes gens (Paris, 1849), written in London after his flight; but by the insurgent mob of the 15th of May and by the victorious Moderates alike he was regarded as responsible. Between the sansculottes, who tried to force him to place himself at their head, and the national guards, who maltreated him, he was nearly done to death. Rescued with difficulty, he escaped with a false passport to Belgium, and thence to London; in his absence he was condemned by the special tribunal established at Bourges, in contumaciam, to deportation. Against trial and sentence he alike protested, developing his protest in a series of articles in the Nouveau Monde, a review published in Paris under his direction. These he afterwards collected and published as Pages de l’histoire de la revolution de 1848 (Brussels, 1850).
In 1847, he published the first two volumes of his Histoire de la Révolution Française. Its release was interrupted by the revolution of 1848, when Louis Blanc became a member of the provisional government. It was on his motion that, on February 25th, the government agreed “to guarantee the existence of the workers through work”; and although his request for a ministry of labor was denied—as it was beyond the authority of a provisional government—he was appointed to lead the government labor commission (Commission du Gouvernement pour les travailleurs) set up at the Luxembourg to investigate and report on the labor issue. On May 10th, he renewed his proposal for a ministry of labor in the National Assembly, but the majority was opposed to socialism, and the proposal was rejected again. He denied responsibility for the failed experiment of the national workshops in his Appel aux honnêtes gens (Paris, 1849), which he wrote in London after fleeing; however, both the insurgent mob of May 15th and the victorious Moderates held him accountable. Caught between the sansculottes, who tried to force him to lead them, and the national guards, who abused him, he was nearly killed. After a difficult rescue, he escaped with a fake passport to Belgium and then to London; in his absence, he was sentenced by the special tribunal established at Bourges, in contumaciam, to deportation. He protested both the trial and the sentence, expanding his protest into a series of articles in the Nouveau Monde, a magazine published in Paris under his direction. He later collected and published these as Pages de l’histoire de la révolution de 1848 (Brussels, 1850).
During his stay in England he made use of the unique collection of materials for the revolutionary period preserved at the British Museum to complete his Histoire de la Révolution Française 12 vols. (1847-1862). In 1858 he published a reply to Lord Normanby’s A Year of Revolution in Paris (1858), which he developed later into his Histoire de la révolution de 1848 (2 vols., 1870-1880). As far back as 1839 Louis Blanc had vehemently opposed the idea of a Napoleonic restoration, predicting that it would be “despotism without glory,” “the Empire without the Emperor.” He therefore remained in exile till the fall of the Second Empire in September 1870, after which he returned to Paris and served as a private in the national guard. On the 8th of February 1871 he was elected a member of the National Assembly, in which he maintained that the republic was “the necessary form of national sovereignty,” and voted for the continuation of the war; yet, though a member of the extreme Left, he was too clear-minded to sympathize with the Commune, and exerted his influence in vain on the side of moderation. In 1878 he advocated the abolition of the presidency and the senate. In January 1879 he introduced into the chamber a proposal for the amnesty of the Communists, which was carried. This was his last important act. His declining years were darkened by ill-health and by the death, in 1876, of his wife (Christina Groh), an Englishwoman whom he had married in 1865. He died at Cannes on the 6th of December 1882, and on the 12th of December received a state funeral in the cemetery of Père-Lachaise.
During his time in England, he took advantage of the unique collection of materials related to the revolutionary period at the British Museum to finish his Histoire de la Révolution Française (12 vols., 1847-1862). In 1858, he published a response to Lord Normanby’s A Year of Revolution in Paris (1858), which he later expanded into his Histoire de la révolution de 1848 (2 vols., 1870-1880). As early as 1839, Louis Blanc strongly opposed the idea of restoring Napoleon, warning that it would lead to “despotism without glory,” “the Empire without the Emperor.” He remained in exile until the collapse of the Second Empire in September 1870, after which he returned to Paris and served as a private in the national guard. On February 8, 1871, he was elected to the National Assembly, where he argued that the republic was “the necessary form of national sovereignty,” and voted for the continuation of the war; however, despite being a member of the extreme Left, he was too clear-headed to support the Commune and tried in vain to promote moderation. In 1878, he pushed for the abolition of the presidency and the senate. In January 1879, he introduced a proposal for the amnesty of the Communists in the chamber, which passed. This was his last significant action. His later years were overshadowed by health issues and the death of his wife, Christina Groh, an Englishwoman he married in 1865, in 1876. He passed away in Cannes on December 6, 1882, and on December 12, he received a state funeral at the Père-Lachaise cemetery.
Louis Blanc possessed a picturesque and vivid style, and considerable power of research; but the fervour with which he expressed his convictions, while placing him in the first rank of orators, tended to turn his historical writings into political pamphlets. His political and social ideas have had a great influence on the development of socialism in France. His Discours politiques (1847-1881) was published in 1882. His most important works, besides those already mentioned, are Lettres sur l’Angleterre (1866-1867), Dix années de l’histoire de l’Angleterre (1879-1881), and Questions d’aujourd’hui et de demain (1873-1884).
Louis Blanc had a vibrant and engaging writing style, along with strong research skills; however, the passion with which he shared his beliefs, while establishing him as a top orator, often turned his historical writings into political pamphlets. His political and social ideas have greatly influenced the development of socialism in France. His Discours politiques (1847-1881) was published in 1882. Besides those already mentioned, his most important works include Lettres sur l’Angleterre (1866-1867), Dix années de l’histoire de l’Angleterre (1879-1881), and Questions d’aujourd’hui et de demain (1873-1884).
See L. Fiaux, Louis Blanc (1883).
See L. Fiaux, *Louis Blanc* (1883).
BLANC, MONT, the culminating point (15,782 ft.) of the mountain range of the same name, which forms part of the Pennine Alps, and is divided unequally between France, Italy and Switzerland. The actual highest summit is wholly French and is the loftiest peak in the Alps, and in Europe also, if certain peaks in the Caucasus be excluded. At Geneva the mountain was in former days named the Montagne Maudite, but the present name seems to have been always used locally. On the north is the valley of Chamonix, and on the east the head of the valley of Aosta. Among the great glaciers which stream from the peak the most noteworthy are those of Bossons and Taconnaz (northern slope) and of Brenva and Miage (southern slope). The first ascent was made in 1786 by two Chamonix men, Jacques Balmat and Dr Michel Paccard, and the second in 1787 by Balmat with two local men. Later in 1787 H.B. de Saussure made the third ascent, memorable in many respects, and was followed a week later by Colonel Beaufoy, the first Englishman to gain the top. These ascents were all made from Chamonix, which is still the usual starting point, though routes have been forced up the peak from nearly every side, those on the Italian side being much steeper than that from Chamonix. The ascent from Chamonix is now frequently made in summer (rarely in winter also), but, owing to the great height of the mountain, the view is unsatisfactory, though very extensive (Lyons is visible). There is an inn at the Grands Mulets (9909 ft.). In 1890 M. Vallot built an observatory and shelter hut (14,312 ft.) on the Bosses du Dromadaire (north-west ridge of the mountain), and in 1893 T.J.C. Janssen constructed an observatory just below the very summit.
BLANC, MONT, is the highest point (15,782 ft.) of the mountain range that shares its name, which is part of the Pennine Alps, straddling France, Italy, and Switzerland. The actual highest peak is entirely located in France and is the tallest mountain in the Alps, and in all of Europe, unless you consider certain peaks in the Caucasus. In earlier times, the mountain was known as Montagne Maudite in Geneva, but the current name has always been used locally. To the north lies the Chamonix valley, and to the east is the start of the Aosta valley. Among the impressive glaciers that flow from the peak, the most notable ones are the Bossons and Taconnaz (on the northern slope) and the Brenva and Miage (on the southern slope). The first successful ascent occurred in 1786 by two locals from Chamonix, Jacques Balmat and Dr. Michel Paccard, followed by a second ascent in 1787 when Balmat climbed again with two local men. Later in 1787, H.B. de Saussure made a significant third ascent, which was notable for many reasons, and was followed a week later by Colonel Beaufoy, the first Englishman to reach the summit. All these ascents started from Chamonix, which is still the main starting point today, although various routes have been taken up the peak from nearly all sides, with the routes on the Italian side being much steeper than those from Chamonix. The ascent from Chamonix is now commonly undertaken in summer (though rarely in winter), but due to the mountain's great height, the view can be unsatisfactory, although it is quite extensive (Lyons can be seen). There is an inn at the Grands Mulets (9909 ft.). In 1890, M. Vallot built an observatory and shelter hut (14,312 ft.) on the Bosses du Dromadaire (the north-west ridge of the mountain), and in 1893, T.J.C. Janssen constructed an observatory just below the summit.
See C. Durier, Le Mont Blanc (4th ed., Paris, 1897); C.E. Mathews, The Annals of Mont Blanc (London, 1898); P. Güssfeldt, Der 40 Montblanc, (Berlin, 1894, also a French translation, Geneva, 1899); L. Kurz, Climbers’ Guide to the Chain of Mont Blanc, section vi. (London, 1892); L. Kurz and X. Imfeld, Carte de la chaine du Mont Blanc (1896, new edition 1905).
See C. Durier, Le Mont Blanc (4th ed., Paris, 1897); C.E. Mathews, The Annals of Mont Blanc (London, 1898); P. Güssfeldt, Der 40 Montblanc, (Berlin, 1894, also a French translation, Geneva, 1899); L. Kurz, Climbers’ Guide to the Chain of Mont Blanc, section vi. (London, 1892); L. Kurz and X. Imfeld, Carte de la chaine du Mont Blanc (1896, new edition 1905).
BLANCHARD, SAMUEL LAMAN (1804-1845), British author and journalist, the son of a painter and glazier, was born at Great Yarmouth on the 15th of May 1804. He was educated at St Olave’s school, Southwark, and then became clerk to a proctor in Doctors’ Commons. At an early age he developed literary tastes, contributing dramatic sketches to a paper called Drama. For a short time he was a member of a travelling dramatic company, but subsequently became a proof-reader in London, and wrote for the Monthly Magazine. In 1827 he was made secretary of the Zoological Society, a post which he held for three years. In 1828 he published Lyric Offerings, dedicated to Charles Lamb. He had a very varied journalistic experience, editing in succession the Monthly Magazine, the True Sun, the Constitutional, the Court Journal, the Courier, and George Cruikshank’s Omnibus; and from 1841 till his death he was connected with the Examiner. In 1846 Bulwer-Lytton collected a number of his prose-essays under the title Sketches of Life, to which a memoir of the author was prefixed. His verse was collected in 1876 by Blanchard Jerrold. Over-work broke down his strength, and, unnerved by the death of his wife, he died by his own hand on the 15th of February 1845.
BLANCHARD, SAMUEL LAMAN (1804-1845), British author and journalist, born on May 15, 1804, in Great Yarmouth, was the son of a painter and glazier. He was educated at St Olave’s school in Southwark and later became a clerk for a proctor in Doctors’ Commons. He developed a passion for writing at an early age, contributing dramatic sketches to a publication called Drama. For a brief period, he was part of a traveling theater group but soon became a proofreader in London and wrote for the Monthly Magazine. In 1827, he was appointed secretary of the Zoological Society, a position he held for three years. In 1828, he published Lyric Offerings, which was dedicated to Charles Lamb. He had a diverse career in journalism, editing various publications including the Monthly Magazine, the True Sun, the Constitutional, the Court Journal, the Courier, and George Cruikshank’s Omnibus; and from 1841 until his death, he was associated with the Examiner. In 1846, Bulwer-Lytton compiled several of his prose essays under the title Sketches of Life, which included a memoir of the author. His poetry was gathered in 1876 by Blanchard Jerrold. Exhausted from overwork and shattered by the death of his wife, he tragically took his own life on February 15, 1845.
His eldest son, Sidney Laman Blanchard, who was the author of Yesterday and To-day in India, died in 1883.
His oldest son, Sidney Laman Blanchard, who wrote Yesterday and To-day in India, passed away in 1883.
BLANCHE, JACQUES ÉMILE (1861- ), French painter, was born in Paris. He enjoyed an excellent cosmopolitan education, and was brought up at Passy in a house once belonging to the princesse de Lamballe, which still retained the atmosphere of 18th-century elegance and refinement and influenced his taste and work. Although he received some instruction in painting from Gervex, he may be regarded as self-taught. He acquired a great reputation as a portrait painter; his art is derived from French and English sources, refined, sometimes super-elegant, but full of character. Among his chief works are his portraits of his father, of Pierre Louÿs, the Thaulow family, Aubrey Beardsley and Yvette Guilbert.
BLANCHE, JACQUES ÉMILE (1861- ), a French painter, was born in Paris. He had a great cosmopolitan education and grew up in Passy in a house that once belonged to the princesse de Lamballe, which still had the vibe of 18th-century elegance and refinement that shaped his taste and work. While he received some painting lessons from Gervex, he is mostly considered self-taught. He gained a strong reputation as a portrait painter; his art is influenced by both French and English styles, refined, sometimes overly elegant, but full of character. Some of his notable works include portraits of his father, Pierre Louÿs, the Thaulow family, Aubrey Beardsley, and Yvette Guilbert.
BLANCHE OF CASTILE (1188-1252), wife of Louis VIII. of France, third daughter of Alphonso VIII., king of Castile, and of Eleanor of England, daughter of Henry II., was born at Valencia. In consequence of a treaty between Philip Augustus and John of England, she was betrothed to the former’s son, Louis, and was brought to France, in the spring of 1200, by John’s mother Eleanor. On the 22nd of May 1200 the treaty was finally signed, John ceding with his niece the fiefs of Issoudun and Graçay, together with those that André de Chavigny, lord of Châteauroux, held in Berry, of the English crown. The marriage was celebrated the next day, at Portmort on the right bank of the Seine, in John’s domains, as those of Philip lay under an interdict.
BLANCHE OF CASTILE (1188-1252), wife of Louis VIII. of France, was the third daughter of Alphonso VIII, king of Castile, and Eleanor of England, daughter of Henry II. She was born in Valencia. Due to a treaty between Philip Augustus and John of England, she was engaged to Philip’s son, Louis, and was brought to France in the spring of 1200 by John’s mother, Eleanor. On May 22, 1200, the treaty was finally signed, with John handing over the fiefs of Issoudun and Graçay, along with those held by André de Chavigny, lord of Châteauroux, in Berry, to the English crown along with his niece. The marriage was celebrated the next day in Portmort on the right bank of the Seine, which was within John’s lands, as Philip's domain was under an interdict.
Blanche first displayed her great qualities in 1216, when Louis, who on the death of John claimed the English crown in her right, invaded England, only to find a united nation against him. Philip Augustus refused to help his son, and Blanche was his sole support. The queen established herself at Calais and organized two fleets, one of which was commanded by Eustace the Monk, and an army under Robert of Courtenay; but all her resolution and energy were in vain. Although it would seem that her masterful temper exercised a sensible influence upon her husband’s gentler character, her role during his reign (1223-1226) is not well known. Upon his death he left Blanche regent and guardian of his children. Of her twelve or thirteen children, six had died, and Louis, the heir—afterwards the sainted Louis IX.,—was but twelve years old. The situation was critical, for the hard-won domains of the house of Capet seemed likely to fall to pieces during a minority. Blanche had to bear the whole burden of affairs alone, to break up a league of the barons (1226), and to repel the attack of the king of England (1230). But her energy and firmness overcame all dangers. There was an end to the calumnies circulated against her, based on the poetical homage rendered her by Theobald IV., count of Champagne, and the prolonged stay in Paris of the papal legate, Romano Bonaventura, cardinal of Sant’ Angelo. The nobles were awed by her warlike preparations or won over by adroit diplomacy, and their league was broken up. St Louis owed his realm to his mother, but he himself always remained somewhat under the spell of her imperious personality. After he came of age (1236) her influence upon him may still be traced. In 1248 she again became regent, during Louis IX.’s absence on the crusade, a project which she had strongly opposed. In the disasters which followed she maintained peace, while draining the land of men and money to aid her son in the East. At last her strength failed her. She fell ill at Melun in November 1252, and was taken to Paris, but lived only a few days. She was buried at Maubuisson.
Blanche first showed her impressive qualities in 1216 when Louis, claiming the English crown through her, invaded England, only to find the entire nation united against him. Philip Augustus refused to help his son, leaving Blanche as his only support. The queen set herself up in Calais and organized two fleets, one led by Eustace the Monk, and an army under Robert of Courtenay; but all her determination and energy were in vain. Although it seemed that her strong personality had a noticeable impact on her husband’s gentler nature, her role during his reign (1223-1226) isn’t well documented. Upon his death, he left Blanche as regent and guardian of their children. Of her twelve or thirteen children, six had died, and Louis, the heir—who later became the sainted Louis IX—was only twelve years old. The situation was critical, as the hard-earned territories of the Capetian house appeared likely to fall apart during a minority. Blanche had to shoulder the entire burden of governance alone, dismantle a league of barons (1226), and fend off an attack from the king of England (1230). However, her energy and resolve overcame all challenges. The rumors spread about her, fueled by the poetic flattery from Theobald IV, count of Champagne, and the extended stay of the papal legate, Romano Bonaventura, the cardinal of Sant’ Angelo in Paris, came to an end. The nobles were either intimidated by her military preparations or won over by her clever diplomacy, and their alliance fell apart. St. Louis owed his kingdom to his mother, but he always remained somewhat under the influence of her commanding personality. Even after reaching adulthood (1236), her impact on him was still evident. In 1248, she became regent again during Louis IX’s absence on the crusade, a venture she strongly opposed. During the subsequent disasters, she kept the peace while draining the resources of the land to support her son in the East. Eventually, her strength gave out. She fell ill in Melun in November 1252 and was taken to Paris, but lived only a few days. She was buried at Maubuisson.
Besides the works of Joinville and William of Nangis, see Élie Berger, “Histoire de Blanche de Castille, reine de France,” in Bibliothèque des écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome, vol. lxx. (Paris, 1895); Le Nain de Tillemont, “Vie de Saint Louis,” ed. by J. de Gaulle for the Société de l’histoire de France (6 vols., 1847-1851); and Paulin Paris, “Nouvelles recherches sur les moeurs de la reine Blanche et de Thibaud,” in Cabinet historique (1858).
Besides the works of Joinville and William of Nangis, see Élie Berger, “History of Blanche of Castile, Queen of France,” in Library of French Schools of Athens and Rome, vol. lxx. (Paris, 1895); Le Nain de Tillemont, “Life of Saint Louis,” edited by J. de Gaulle for the Society of French History (6 vols., 1847-1851); and Paulin Paris, “New Research on the Customs of Queen Blanche and Thibaud,” in Historical Cabinet (1858).
BLANDFORD, or Blandford Forum, a market town, and municipal borough in the northern parliamentary division of Dorsetshire, England, on the Stour, 19 m. N.W. of Bournemouth by the Somerset & Dorset railway. Pop. (1901) 3649. The town is ancient, but was almost wholly destroyed by fire in the 18th century. The church of St Peter and St Paul, a classical building, was built in 1732. There are a grammar-school (founded in 1521 at Milton Abbas, transferred to Blandford in 1775), a Blue Coat school (1729), and other educational charities. Remnants of a mansion of the 14th century, Damory Court, are seen in a farmhouse, and an adjoining Perpendicular chapel is used as a barn. There are numerous early earthworks on the chalk hills in the neighbourhood. The fine modern mansion of Bryanston, in the park adjoining the town, is the seat of Lord Portman. The municipal borough is under a mayor, 4 aldermen and 12 councillors. Area, 145 acres.
BLANDFORD, or Blandford Forum, is a market town and municipal borough located in the northern parliamentary division of Dorsetshire, England, on the Stour River, 19 miles northwest of Bournemouth via the Somerset & Dorset railway. Population (1901) was 3,649. The town has a long history but was nearly completely destroyed by fire in the 18th century. The church of St. Peter and St. Paul, a classical structure, was built in 1732. There is a grammar school (founded in 1521 at Milton Abbas, moved to Blandford in 1775), a Blue Coat school (established in 1729), and other educational charities. Remains of a 14th-century mansion, Damory Court, can be found in a farmhouse, along with an adjacent Perpendicular chapel that is now used as a barn. There are many early earthworks on the chalk hills nearby. The impressive modern mansion of Bryanston, located in the park next to the town, is the home of Lord Portman. The municipal borough is governed by a mayor, four aldermen, and twelve councillors. Area: 145 acres.
BLANDRATA, or Biandrata, GIORGIO (c. 1515-1588), Italian physician and polemic, who came of the De Blandrate family, powerful from the early part of the 13th century, was born at Saluzzo, the youngest son of Bernardino Blandrata. He graduated in arts and medicine at Montpellier in 1533, and specialized in the functional and nervous disorders of women. In 1544 he made his first acquaintance with Transylvania; in 1553 he was with Alciati in the Grisons; in 1557 he spent a year at Geneva, in constant intercourse with Calvin, who distrusted him. He attended the English wife (Jane Stafford) of Count Celso Massimiliano Martinengo, preacher of the Italian church at Geneva, and fostered anti-trinitarian opinions in that church. In 1558 he found it expedient to remove to Poland, where he became a leader of the heretical party at the synods of Pinczów (1558) and Ksionzh (1560 and 1562). His point was the suppression of extremes of opinion, on the basis of a confession literally drawn from Scripture. He obtained the position of court physician to the queen dowager, the Milanese Bona Sforza. She had been instrumental in the burning (1539) of Catharine Weygel, at the age of eighty, for anti-trinitarian opinions; but the writings of Ochino had altered her views, which were now anti-Catholic. In 1563 Blandrata transferred his services to the Transylvanian court, where the daughters of his patroness were married to ruling princes. He revisited Poland (1576) in the train of Stephen Báthory, whose tolerance permitted the propagation of heresies; and when (1579) Christopher Báthory introduced the Jesuits into Transylvania, Blandrata found means of conciliating them. Throughout his career he was accompanied by his two brothers, Ludovico and Alphonso, the former being canon of Saluzzo. In Transylvania, Blandrata co-operated with Francis Dávid (d. 1579), the anti-trinitarian bishop, but in 1578 two circumstances broke the 41 connexion. Blandrata was charged with “Italian vice”; Dávid renounced the worship of Christ. To influence Dávid, Blandrata sent for Faustus Socinus from Basel. Socinus was Dávid’s guest, but the discussion between them led to no result. At the instance of Blandrata, Dávid was tried and condemned to prison at Déva (in which he died) on the charge of innovation. Having amassed a fortune, Blandrata returned to the communion of Rome. His end is obscure. According to the Jesuit, Jacob Wujek, he was strangled by a nephew (Giorgio, son of Alphonso) in May 1588. He published a few polemical writings, some in conjunction with Dávid.
BLANDRATA, or Biandrata, GIORGIO (c. 1515-1588), an Italian physician and debater, came from the powerful De Blandrate family, prominent since the early 13th century. He was born in Saluzzo, the youngest son of Bernardino Blandrata. He graduated with a degree in arts and medicine from Montpellier in 1533 and focused on functional and nervous disorders in women. In 1544, he first traveled to Transylvania; by 1553, he was in the Grisons with Alciati; and in 1557, he spent a year in Geneva, in regular contact with Calvin, who was suspicious of him. He cared for the English wife (Jane Stafford) of Count Celso Massimiliano Martinengo, the preacher of the Italian church in Geneva, and promoted anti-Trinitarian views in that church. In 1558, he decided to move to Poland, where he became a leader of the heretical faction at the synods in Pinczów (1558) and Ksionzh (1560 and 1562). His aim was to moderate extreme opinions based on a confession rooted in Scripture. He gained the role of court physician to the queen dowager, the Milanese Bona Sforza, who had previously been involved in the execution (1539) of Catharine Weygel, aged eighty, for anti-Trinitarian beliefs. However, due to the influence of Ochino’s writings, her views had shifted to anti-Catholicism. In 1563, Blandrata moved his services to the Transylvanian court, where the daughters of his patroness had married ruling princes. He returned to Poland in 1576 with Stephen Báthory, whose tolerance allowed heresies to spread; when (1579) Christopher Báthory brought the Jesuits to Transylvania, Blandrata managed to find common ground with them. Throughout his career, his two brothers, Ludovico and Alphonso, accompanied him, with Ludovico serving as a canon in Saluzzo. In Transylvania, Blandrata worked with Francis Dávid (d. 1579), the anti-Trinitarian bishop, but in 1578, two events severed their connection. Blandrata was accused of “Italian vice,” and Dávid renounced the worship of Christ. To sway Dávid, Blandrata called for Faustus Socinus from Basel. Although Socinus visited Dávid, their discussions led nowhere. At Blandrata's request, Dávid was tried and sentenced to imprisonment in Déva (where he died) on innovation charges. After amassing wealth, Blandrata returned to the Roman communion. His death is unclear; according to the Jesuit Jacob Wujek, he was strangled by a nephew (Giorgio, son of Alphonso) in May 1588. He published several polemical texts, some in collaboration with Dávid.
See Malacarne, Commentario delle Opere e delle Vicende di G. Blandrata (Padova, 1814); Wallace, Anti-trinitarian Biography, vol. ii. (1850).
See Malacarne, Commentario delle Opere e delle Vicende di G. Blandrata (Padova, 1814); Wallace, Anti-trinitarian Biography, vol. ii. (1850).
BLANE, SIR GILBERT (1740-1834), Scottish physician, was born at Blanefield, Ayrshire, on the 29th of August 1749. He was educated at Edinburgh university, and shortly after his removal to London became private physician to Lord Rodney, whom he accompanied to the West Indies in 1779. He did much to improve the health of the fleet by attention to the diet of the sailors and by enforcing due sanitary precautions, and it was largely through him that in 1795 the use of lime-juice was made obligatory throughout the navy as a preventive of scurvy. Enjoying a number of court and hospital appointments he built up a good practice for himself in London, and the government constantly consulted him on questions of public hygiene. He was made a baronet in 1812 in reward for the services he rendered in connexion with the return of the Walcheren expedition. He died in London on the 26th of June 1834. Among his works were Observations on the Diseases of Seamen (1795) and Elements of Medical Logic (1819).
BLANE, SIR GILBERT (1740-1834), Scottish physician, was born in Blanefield, Ayrshire, on August 29, 1749. He studied at Edinburgh University, and shortly after moving to London, became the private physician to Lord Rodney, whom he accompanied to the West Indies in 1779. He significantly improved the health of the fleet by focusing on the sailors' diet and enforcing proper sanitary measures. It was largely due to his efforts that in 1795, the use of lime juice became mandatory throughout the navy to prevent scurvy. Holding various court and hospital positions, he established a successful practice in London, and the government frequently consulted him on public health issues. He was made a baronet in 1812 in recognition of his contributions to the return of the Walcheren expedition. He passed away in London on June 26, 1834. His works include Observations on the Diseases of Seamen (1795) and Elements of Medical Logic (1819).
BLANFORD, WILLIAM THOMAS (1832-1905), English geologist and naturalist, was born in London on the 7th of October 1832. He was educated in private schools in Brighton and Paris, and with a view to the adoption of a mercantile career spent two years in a business house at Civita Vecchia. On returning to England in 1851 he was induced to enter the newly established Royal School of Mines, which his younger brother Henry F. Blanford (1834-1893), afterwards head of the Indian Meteorological Department, had already joined; he then spent a year in the mining school at Freiburg, and towards the close of 1854 both he and his brother obtained posts on the Geological Survey of India. In that service he remained for twenty-seven years, retiring in 1882. He was engaged in various parts of India, in the Raniganj coalfield, in Bombay, and in the coalfield near Talchir, where boulders considered to have been ice-borne were found in the Talchir strata—a remarkable discovery confirmed by subsequent observations of other geologists in equivalent strata elsewhere. His attention was given not only to geology but to zoology, and especially to the land-mollusca and to the vertebrates. In 1866 he was attached to the Abyssinian expedition, accompanying the army to Mágdala and back; and in 1871-1872 he was appointed a member of the Persian Boundary Commission. The best use was made of the exceptional opportunities of studying the natural history of those countries. For his many contributions to geological science Dr Blanford was in 1883 awarded the Wollaston medal by the Geological Society of London; and for his labours on the zoology and geology of British India he received in 1901 a royal medal from the Royal Society. He had been elected F.R.S. in 1874, and was chosen president of the Geological Society in 1888. He was created C.I.E. in 1904. He died in London on the 23rd of June 1905. His principal publications were: Observations on the Geology and Zoology of Abyssinia (1870), and Manual of the Geology of India, with H.B. Medlicott (1879).
BLANFORD, WILLIAM THOMAS (1832-1905), an English geologist and naturalist, was born in London on October 7, 1832. He attended private schools in Brighton and Paris, and to prepare for a career in business, he spent two years working in a firm in Civita Vecchia. After returning to England in 1851, he was encouraged to enroll in the newly founded Royal School of Mines, which his younger brother Henry F. Blanford (1834-1893), who later headed the Indian Meteorological Department, had already joined. He then studied for a year at the mining school in Freiburg, and toward the end of 1854, both he and his brother secured positions on the Geological Survey of India. He worked there for twenty-seven years, retiring in 1882. His work took him to various locations in India, including the Raniganj coalfield, Bombay, and the coalfield near Talchir, where boulders believed to have been carried by ice were discovered in the Talchir strata—a significant find confirmed by later observations from other geologists in similar strata elsewhere. He focused not only on geology but also on zoology, especially land mollusks and vertebrates. In 1866, he was part of the Abyssinian expedition, accompanying the army to Mágdala and back, and in 1871-1872, he served as a member of the Persian Boundary Commission. He took full advantage of the unique opportunities to study the natural history of those regions. For his numerous contributions to geological science, Dr. Blanford was awarded the Wollaston medal by the Geological Society of London in 1883; and for his work on the zoology and geology of British India, he received a royal medal from the Royal Society in 1901. He was elected F.R.S. in 1874 and served as president of the Geological Society in 1888. He was made C.I.E. in 1904. He passed away in London on June 23, 1905. His major publications include Observations on the Geology and Zoology of Abyssinia (1870) and Manual of the Geology of India, co-authored with H.B. Medlicott (1879).
Biography, with bibliography and portrait, in Geological Magazine, January 1905.
Biography, with a bibliography and portrait, in Geological Magazine, January 1905.
BLANK (from the Fr. blanc, white), a word used in various senses based on that of “left white,” i.e. requiring something to be filled in; thus a “blank cheque” is one which requires the amount to be inserted, an insurance policy in blank, where the name of the beneficiary is lacking, “blank verse” (q.v.) verse without rhyme, “blank cartridge” that contains only powder and no ball or shot. The word is also used, as a substantive, for a ticket in a lottery or sweepstake which does not carry a number or the name of a horse running or for an unstamped metal disc in coining.
BLANK (from the Fr. blanc, white), a term used in different ways based on the idea of “left white,” i.e. needing something to be filled in; for example, a “blank check” is one where the amount needs to be added, an insurance policy in blank, which is missing the beneficiary's name, “blank verse” (q.v.) is verse without rhyme, and a “blank cartridge” that contains only gunpowder and no bullet or shot. The term is also used as a noun for a lottery or sweepstake ticket that doesn’t have a number or the name of a horse running, or for an unstamped metal disc used in coinage.
BLANKENBERGHE, a seaside watering-place on the North Sea in the province of West Flanders, Belgium, 12 m. N.E. of Ostend, and about 9 m. N.W. of Bruges, with which it is connected by railway. It is more bracing than Ostend, and has a fine parade over a mile in length. During the season, which extends from June to September, it receives a large number of visitors, probably over 60,000 altogether, from Germany as well as from Belgium. There is a small fishing port as well as a considerable fishing-fleet. Two miles north of this place along the dunes is Zeebrugge, the point at which the new ship-canal from Bruges enters the North Sea. Fixed population (1904) 5925.
BLANKENBERGHE, is a seaside resort on the North Sea in West Flanders, Belgium, located 12 miles northeast of Ostend, and about 9 miles northwest of Bruges, with a railway connection to both. It offers fresher air than Ostend and features a beautiful promenade over a mile long. During the season, which runs from June to September, it attracts a large number of visitors, probably over 60,000 in total, from Germany as well as Belgium. There’s a small fishing port and a significant fishing fleet. Two miles north of Blankenberghe along the dunes is Zeebrugge, where the new ship canal from Bruges meets the North Sea. Fixed population (1904) 5,925.
BLANKENBURG. (1) A town and health resort of Germany, in the duchy of Brunswick, at the N. foot of the Harz Mountains, 12 m. by rail S.W. from Halberstadt. Pop. (1901) 10,173. It has been in large part rebuilt since a fire in 1836, and possesses a castle, with various collections, a museum of antiquities, an old town hall and churches. There are pine-needle baths and a hospital for nervous diseases. Gardening is a speciality. In the vicinity is a cliff or ridge of rock called Teufelsmauer (Devil’s wall), from which fine views are obtained across the plain and into the deep gorges of the Harz Mountains.
BLANKENBURG. (1) A town and health resort in Germany, located in the duchy of Brunswick at the north foot of the Harz Mountains, 12 miles by rail southwest of Halberstadt. Population (1901) was 10,173. It has been largely rebuilt since a fire in 1836 and features a castle with various collections, a museum of antiquities, an old town hall, and churches. There are pine-needle baths and a hospital for nervous disorders. Gardening is a specialty. Nearby, there's a cliff or ridge of rock known as Teufelsmauer (Devil’s Wall), which offers great views across the plain and into the deep gorges of the Harz Mountains.
(2) Another Blankenburg, also a health-resort, is situated in Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt, Thuringia, at the confluence of the rivers Rinne and Schwarza, and at the entrance of the Schwarzatal. Its environs are charming, and to the north of it, on an eminence, rise the fine ruins of the castle of Greifenstein, built by the German king Henry I., and from 1275 to 1583 the seat of a cadet branch of the counts of Schwarzburg.
(2) Another Blankenburg, also a health resort, is located in Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt, Thuringia, at the meeting point of the Rinne and Schwarza rivers, and at the entrance to the Schwarzatal. Its surroundings are lovely, and to the north, on a hill, stand the impressive ruins of Greifenstein Castle, built by German King Henry I, and from 1275 to 1583, it was the residence of a branch of the counts of Schwarzburg.
BLANKETEERS, the nickname given to some 5000 operatives who on the 10th of March 1817 met in St Peter’s Field, near Manchester, to march to London, each carrying blankets or rugs. Their object was to see the prince regent and lay their grievances before him. The Habeas Corpus Act was suspended, and the leaders were seized and imprisoned. The bulk of the demonstration yielded at once. The few stragglers who persisted in the march were intercepted by troops, and treated with considerable severity. Eventually the spokesmen had an interview with the ministers, and some reforms were the result.
BLANKETEERS, was the nickname for around 5,000 people who gathered on March 10, 1817, at St Peter’s Field near Manchester to march to London, each carrying a blanket or rug. Their goal was to meet the prince regent and present their concerns. The Habeas Corpus Act was suspended, and the leaders were arrested and imprisoned. Most of the protestors surrendered immediately. A few stragglers who continued the march were stopped by troops and treated quite harshly. Ultimately, the representatives had a meeting with the ministers, leading to some reforms.
BLANK VERSE, the unrhymed measure of iambic decasyllable in five beats which is usually adopted in English epic and dramatic poetry. The epithet is due to the absence of the rhyme which the ear expects at the end of successive lines. The decasyllabic line occurs for the first time in a Provençal poem of the 10th century, but in the earliest instances preserved it is already constructed with such regularity as to suggest that it was no new invention. It was certainly being used almost simultaneously in the north of France. Chaucer employed it in his Compleynte to Pitie about 1370. In all the literatures of western Europe it became generally used, but always with rhyme. In the beginning of the 16th century, however, certain Italian poets made the experiment of writing decasyllabics without rhyme. The tragedy of Sophonisba (1515) of G.G. Trissino (1478-1550) was the earliest work completed in this form; it was followed in 1525 by the didactic poem Le Api (The Bees), of Giovanni Rucellai (1475-1525), who announced his intention of writing ”Con verso Etrusco dalle rime sciolto,” in consequence of which expression this kind of metre was called versi sciolti or blank verse. In a very short time this form was largely adopted in Italian dramatic poetry, and the comedies of Ariosto, the Aminta of Tasso and the Pastor Fido of Guarini are composed in it. The iambic blank verse of Italy was, however, mainly hendecasyllabic, not decasyllabic, and under French influences the habit of rhyme soon returned.
BLANK VERSE, is the unrhymed form of iambic decasyllable in five beats, typically used in English epic and dramatic poetry. It's called blank verse because it lacks the rhyme that the ear expects at the end of successive lines. The decasyllabic line first appeared in a Provençal poem from the 10th century, but even in its earliest forms, it was constructed so regularly that it seems it wasn't a new invention. It was certainly being used almost simultaneously in northern France. Chaucer used it in his Compleynte to Pitie around 1370. In all the literatures of western Europe, it became widely used, but always with rhyme. However, in the early 16th century, some Italian poets began experimenting with writing decasyllabics without rhyme. The tragedy Sophonisba (1515) by G.G. Trissino (1478-1550) was the first work completed in this form; it was followed in 1525 by the didactic poem Le Api (The Bees) by Giovanni Rucellai (1475-1525), who announced his intention to write ”Con verso Etrusco dalle rime sciolto,” which led to this type of meter being called versi sciolti or blank verse. Very quickly, this form was widely adopted in Italian dramatic poetry, with the comedies of Ariosto, the Aminta of Tasso, and the Pastor Fido of Guarini being composed in it. However, Italian iambic blank verse was primarily hendecasyllabic, not decasyllabic, and the return to rhyme soon occurred under French influences.
Before the close of Trissino’s life, however, his invention had been introduced into another literature, where it was destined to enjoy a longer and more glorious existence. Towards the 42 close of the reign of Henry VIII., Henry Howard, earl of Surrey, translated two books of the Aeneid into English rhymeless verse, “drawing” them “into a strange metre.” Surrey’s blank verse is stiff and timid, permitting itself no divergence from the exact iambic movement:—
Before Trissino's life ended, his invention had made its way into another literature, where it was set to have a longer and more illustrious existence. Towards the 42 end of Henry VIII's reign, Henry Howard, the Earl of Surrey, translated two books of the Aeneid into English rhymeless verse, “drawing” them “into a strange metre.” Surrey's blank verse is rigid and cautious, sticking closely to the strict iambic rhythm:—
“Who can express the slaughter of that night, “Who can describe the massacre of that night, Or tell the number of the corpses slain, Or tell the number of the dead bodies killed, Or can in tears bewail them worthily? Or can they be mourned worthily in tears? The ancient famous city falleth down, The ancient famous city falls down, That many years did hold such seignory.” That many years did hold such authority.” |
Surrey soon found an imitator in Nicholas Grimoald, and in 1562 blank verse was first applied to English dramatic poetry in the Gorboduc of Sackville and Norton. In 1576, in the Steel Glass of Gascoigne, it was first used for satire, and by the year 1585 it had come into almost universal use for theatrical purposes. In Lyly’s The Woman in the Moon and Peek’s Arraignment of Paris (both of 1584) we find blank verse struggling with rhymed verse and successfully holding its own. The earliest play written entirely in blank verse is supposed to be The Misfortunes of Arthur (1587) of Thomas Hughes. Marlowe now immediately followed, with the magnificent movement of his Tamburlaine (1589), which was mocked by satirical critics as “the swelling bombast of bragging blank verse” (Nash) and “the spacious volubility of a drumming decasyllable” (Greene), but which introduced a great new music into English poetry, in such “mighty lines” as
Surrey quickly had a follower in Nicholas Grimoald, and in 1562, blank verse was first used in English dramatic poetry with Sackville and Norton's Gorboduc. In 1576, Gascoigne introduced it for satire in his Steel Glass, and by 1585, it had nearly become standard for theatrical works. In Lyly’s The Woman in the Moon and Peek’s Arraignment of Paris (both from 1584), blank verse competed with rhymed verse and proved to be just as strong. The first play entirely written in blank verse is believed to be Thomas Hughes' The Misfortunes of Arthur (1587). Marlowe then followed suit with the powerful movement in his Tamburlaine (1589), which was ridiculed by satirical critics as “the inflated bragging of blank verse” (Nash) and “the elaborate smoothness of a drumming decasyllable” (Greene), but it brought a fresh new rhythm to English poetry, with such “mighty lines” as
“Still climbing after knowledge infinite, "Continuously seeking infinite knowledge," And always moving as the restless spheres,” And always moving like the restless planets, |
or:—
or:—
“See where Christ’s blood streams in the firmament!”
“Look at where Christ’s blood flows in the sky!”
Except, however, when he is stirred by a particularly vivid emotion, the blank verse of Marlowe continues to be monotonous and uniform. It still depends too exclusively on a counting of syllables. But Shakespeare, after having returned to rhyme in his earliest dramas, particularly in The Two Gentlemen of Verona, adopted blank verse conclusively about the time that the career of Marlowe was closing, and he carried it to the greatest perfection in variety, suppleness and fulness. He released it from the excessive bondage that it had hitherto endured; as Robert Bridges has said, “Shakespeare, whose early verse may be described as syllabic, gradually came to write a verse dependent on stress.” In comparison with that of his predecessors and successors, the blank verse of Shakespeare is essentially regular, and his prosody marks the admirable mean between the stiffness of his dramatic forerunners and the laxity of those who followed him. Most of Shakespeare’s lines conform to the normal type of the decasyllable, and the rest are accounted for by familiar and rational rules of variation. The ease and fluidity of his prosody were abused by his successors, particularly by Beaumont and Fletcher, who employed the soft feminine ending to excess; in Massinger dramatic blank verse came too near to prose, and in Heywood and Shirley it was relaxed to the point of losing all nervous vigour.
However, except when he’s moved by a particularly strong emotion, Marlowe's blank verse tends to be monotonous and uniform. It relies too heavily on counting syllables. But Shakespeare, after revisiting rhyme in his early plays, especially in The Two Gentlemen of Verona, fully embraced blank verse around the time Marlowe’s career was coming to an end, and he perfected it in terms of variety, flexibility, and richness. He freed it from the excessive constraints it had suffered under before; as Robert Bridges noted, “Shakespeare, whose early verse may be described as syllabic, gradually came to write a verse dependent on stress.” Compared to that of his predecessors and successors, Shakespeare's blank verse is fundamentally regular, and his prosody strikes a remarkable balance between the rigidity of his dramatic predecessors and the looseness of those who came after him. Most of Shakespeare’s lines fit the standard decasyllable type, with the variations explained by familiar and reasonable rules. His smooth and fluid prosody was misused by his successors, especially Beaumont and Fletcher, who overused the soft feminine ending; in Massinger, dramatic blank verse edged too close to prose, and in Heywood and Shirley, it relaxed to the point of losing all its energetic strength.
The later dramatists gradually abandoned that rigorous difference which should always be preserved between the cadence of verse and prose, and the example of Ford, who endeavoured to revive the old severity of blank verse, was not followed. But just as the form was sinking into dramatic desuetude, it took new life in the direction of epic, and found its noblest proficient in the person of John Milton. The most intricate and therefore the most interesting blank verse which has been written is that of Milton in the great poems of his later life. He reduced the elisions, which had been frequent in the Elizabethan poets, to law; he admitted an extraordinary variety in the number of stresses; he deliberately inverted the rhythm in order to produce particular effects; and he multiplied at will the caesurae or breaks in a line. Such verses as
The later playwrights gradually moved away from the strict distinction that should always be maintained between the rhythm of poetry and prose, and Ford's attempt to revive the old seriousness of blank verse didn’t catch on. But just as this form seemed to be fading from dramatic use, it gained new life in the epic genre, with John Milton becoming its greatest master. The most complex and therefore the most captivating blank verse ever written belongs to Milton in the great poems of his later years. He regulated the elisions, which had been common among Elizabethan poets; he embraced an extraordinary variety in the number of stresses; he intentionally altered the rhythm to create specific effects, and he freely used caesurae or pauses in a line. Verses like
“Arraying with reflected purple and gold— “Arranging with reflected purple and gold— Shoots invisible virtue even to the deep— Shoots invisible goodness even to the depths— Universal reproach, far worse to bear— Universal reproach, much harder to endure— Me, me only, just object of his ire”— Me, just the target of his anger— |
are not mistaken in rhythm, nor to be scanned by forcing them to obey the conventional stress. They are instances, and Paradise Lost is full of such, of Milton’s exquisite art in ringing changes upon the metrical type of ten syllables, five stresses and a rising rhythm, so as to make the whole texture of the verse respond to his poetical thought. Writing many years later in Paradise Regained and in Samson Agonistes, Milton retained his system of blank verse in its general characteristics, but he treated it with increased dryness and with a certain harshness of effect. It is certainly in his biblical drama that blank verse has been pushed to its most artificial and technical perfection, and it is there that Milton’s theories are to be studied best; yet it must be confessed that learning excludes beauty in some of the very audacious irregularities which he here permits himself in Samson Agonistes. Such lines as
are not wrong in their rhythm, nor should they be forced into conventional patterns. They are examples, and Paradise Lost is filled with them, showcasing Milton’s incredible skill in varying the ten-syllable meter, with five stresses and a rising rhythm, so the entire structure of the verse aligns with his poetic ideas. Years later, in Paradise Regained and Samson Agonistes, Milton kept his blank verse style similar but approached it with more dryness and a somewhat harsh effect. It is definitely in his biblical drama that blank verse reaches its most artificial and technical perfection, making it the best place to study Milton's theories; however, it must be acknowledged that this focus on learning sometimes sacrifices beauty in some of the bold irregularities he allows himself in Samson Agonistes. Lines like
“Made arms ridiculous, useless the forgery— “Made arms seem silly, worthless the fake— My griefs not only pain me as a lingering disease— My sorrows not only hurt me like a constant illness— Drunk with idolatry, drunk with wine— Drunk with worship, drunk with wine— Justly, yet despair not of his final pardon”— Justly, but do not lose hope in his final forgiveness. |
are constructed with perfect comprehension of metrical law, yet they differ so much from the normal structure of blank verse that they need to be explained, and to imitate them would be perilous. A persistent weakness in the third foot has ever been the snare of English blank verse, and it is this element of monotony and dulness which Milton is ceaselessly endeavouring to obviate by his wonderful inversions, elisions and breaks.
are built with a complete understanding of meter, yet they differ so much from the usual structure of blank verse that they require explanation, and trying to copy them could be risky. A constant issue in the third foot has always been the trap of English blank verse, and it is this element of monotony and dullness that Milton continually tries to avoid with his amazing inversions, elisions, and breaks.
After the Restoration, and after a brief period of experiment with rhymed plays, the dramatists returned to the use of blank verse, and in the hands of Otway, Lee and Dryden, it recovered much of its magnificence. In the 18th century, Thomson and others made use of a very regular and somewhat monotonous form of blank verse for descriptive and didactic poems, of which the Night Thoughts of Young is, from a metrical point of view, the most interesting. With these poets the form is little open to licence, while inversions and breaks are avoided as much as possible. Since the 18th century, blank verse has been subjected to constant revision in the hands of Wordsworth, Coleridge, Shelley, Keats, Tennyson, the Brownings and Swinburne, but no radical changes, of a nature unknown to Shakespeare and Milton, have been introduced into it.
After the Restoration, and after a short experiment with rhymed plays, playwrights went back to using blank verse, which regained much of its grandeur in the hands of Otway, Lee, and Dryden. In the 18th century, Thomson and others adopted a very regular and somewhat monotonous form of blank verse for descriptive and didactic poems, with Young's Night Thoughts being the most interesting from a metrical perspective. For these poets, the form allows little flexibility, and they try to avoid inversions and breaks as much as possible. Since the 18th century, blank verse has been continuously revised by Wordsworth, Coleridge, Shelley, Keats, Tennyson, the Brownings, and Swinburne, but no major changes, different from those made by Shakespeare and Milton, have been introduced.
See J.A. Symonds, Blank Verse (1895); Walter Thomas, Le Décasyllabe romain et sa fortune en Europe (1904); Robert Bridges Milton’s Prosody (1894); Ed. Guest, A History of English Rhythms (1882); J. Motheré, Les Théories du vers héreoïque anglais (1886); J. Schipper, Englische Metrik (1881-1888).
See J.A. Symonds, Blank Verse (1895); Walter Thomas, Le Décasyllabe romain et sa fortune en Europe (1904); Robert Bridges, Milton’s Prosody (1894); Ed. Guest, A History of English Rhythms (1882); J. Motheré, Les Théories du vers héreoïque anglais (1886); J. Schipper, Englische Metrik (1881-1888).
BLANQUI, JERÔME ADOLPHE (1798-1854), French economist, was born at Nice on the 21st of November 1798. Beginning life as a schoolmaster in Paris, he was attracted to the study of economics by the lectures of J.B. Say, whose pupil and assistant he became. Upon the recommendation of Say he was in 1825 appointed professor of industrial economy and of history at the Conservatoire des Arts et Métiers. In 1833 he succeeded Say as professor of political economy at the same institution, and in 1838 was elected a member of the Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques. In 1838 appeared his most important work, Histoire de l’économie politique en Europe, depuis les anciens jusqu’à nos jours. He was indefatigable in research, and for the purposes of his economic inquiries travelled over almost the whole of Europe and visited Algeria and the East. He contributed much to our knowledge of the conditions of the working-classes, especially in France. Other works of Blanqui were De la situation économique et morale de l’Espagne en 1846; Résumé de l’histoire du commerce et de l’industrie (1826); Précis élémentaire d’économie politique (1826); Les Classes ouvrières en France (1848).
BLANQUI, JERÔME ADOLPHE (1798-1854), French economist, was born in Nice on November 21, 1798. He started his career as a schoolteacher in Paris and was drawn to economics through the lectures of J.B. Say, eventually becoming his student and assistant. Thanks to Say's recommendation, he was appointed in 1825 as a professor of industrial economy and history at the Conservatoire des Arts et Métiers. In 1833, he took over Say's position as professor of political economy at the same institution and became a member of the Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques in 1838. That same year, he published his most significant work, Histoire de l’économie politique en Europe, depuis les anciens jusqu’à nos jours. He was tireless in his research and traveled across almost all of Europe, as well as visiting Algeria and the East, for his economic studies. He greatly enhanced our understanding of the working-class conditions, particularly in France. Other works by Blanqui include De la situation économique et morale de l’Espagne en 1846; Résumé de l’histoire du commerce et de l’industrie (1826); Précis élémentaire d’économie politique (1826); Les Classes ouvrières en France (1848).
BLANQUI, LOUIS AUGUSTE (1805-1881), French publicist, was born on the 8th of February 1805 at Puget-Théniers, where his father, Jean Dominique Blanqui, was at that time sub-prefect. He studied both law and medicine, but found his real vocation in politics, and at once constituted himself a champion of the most advanced opinions. He took an active part in the revolution of July 1830, and continuing to maintain the doctrine of republicanism during the reign of Louis Philippe, was condemned to repeated terms of imprisonment. Implicated in the armed outbreak of the Société des Saisons, of which he was a 43 leading spirit, he was in the following year, 1840, condemned to death, a sentence that was afterwards commuted to imprisonment for life. He was released by the revolution of 1848, only to resume his attacks on existing institutions. The revolution, he declared, was a mere change of name. The violence of the Société républicaine centrale, which was founded by Blanqui to demand a modification of the government, brought him into conflict with the more moderate Republicans, and in 1849 he was condemned to ten years’ imprisonment. In 1865, while serving a further term of imprisonment under the Empire, he contrived to escape, and henceforth continued his propaganda against the government from abroad, until the general amnesty of 1869 enabled him to return to France. Blanqui’s leaning towards violent measures was illustrated in 1870 by two unsuccessful armed demonstrations: one on the 12th of January at the funeral of Victor Noir, the journalist shot by Pierre Bonaparte; the other on the 14th of August, when he led an attempt to seize some guns at a barrack. Upon the fall of the Empire, through the revolution of the 4th of September, Blanqui established the club and journal La patrie en danger. He was one of the band that for a moment seized the reins of power on the 31st of October, and for his share in that outbreak he was again condemned to death on the 17th of March of the following year. A few days afterwards the insurrection which established the Commune broke out, and Blanqui was elected a member of the insurgent government, but his detention in prison prevented him from taking an active part. Nevertheless he was in 1872 condemned along with the other members of the Commune to transportation; but on account of his broken health this sentence was commuted to one of imprisonment. In 1879 he was elected a deputy for Bordeaux; although the election was pronounced invalid, Blanqui was set at liberty, and at once resumed his work of agitation. At the end of 1880, after a speech at a revolutionary meeting in Paris, he was struck down by apoplexy, and expired on the 1st of January 1881. Blanqui’s uncompromising communism, and his determination to enforce it by violence, necessarily brought him into conflict with every French government, and half his life was spent in prison. Besides his innumerable contributions to journalism, he published an astronomical work entitled L’Éternité par les astres (1872), and after his death his writings on economic and social questions were collected under the title of Critique sociale (1885).
BLANQUI, LOUIS AUGUSTE (1805-1881), French publicist, was born on February 8, 1805, in Puget-Théniers, where his father, Jean Dominique Blanqui, was then the sub-prefect. He studied law and medicine but found his true calling in politics, quickly becoming an advocate for progressive ideas. He actively participated in the revolution of July 1830, and as he continued to support republicanism during Louis Philippe’s reign, he faced multiple imprisonments. Involved in the armed uprising of the Société des Saisons, where he was a prominent figure, he was sentenced to death in 1840, a verdict later changed to life imprisonment. Released by the revolution of 1848, he immediately resumed his criticism of the existing government, claiming the revolution was just a name change. The aggression of the Société républicaine centrale, founded by Blanqui to push for government reform, put him at odds with more moderate Republicans, leading to a ten-year prison sentence in 1849. While serving another prison term under the Empire in 1865, he managed to escape and continued his fight against the government from abroad until a general amnesty in 1869 allowed him to return to France. Blanqui's inclination towards violent action was evident in 1870 with two failed armed protests: one on January 12 at the funeral of journalist Victor Noir, killed by Pierre Bonaparte, and another on August 14 when he attempted to seize weapons from a barracks. Following the fall of the Empire due to the revolution of September 4, Blanqui founded the club and journal La patrie en danger. He was part of a group that briefly took power on October 31 and was sentenced to death again on March 17 the following year for his involvement. Just a few days later, the insurrection that led to the Commune began, and Blanqui was elected to the insurgent government, but he couldn’t participate actively due to his imprisonment. Nonetheless, in 1872, he was sentenced to transportation alongside other Commune members, but his deteriorating health resulted in that sentence being changed to imprisonment. In 1879, he was elected as a deputy for Bordeaux; even though the election was declared invalid, Blanqui was released and immediately returned to his activist work. At the end of 1880, after giving a speech at a revolutionary event in Paris, he suffered a stroke and died on January 1, 1881. Blanqui’s unwavering communism and his resolve to achieve it through violence brought him into conflict with every French government, spending half his life behind bars. Besides his numerous journalistic contributions, he published an astronomical work titled L’Éternité par les astres (1872), and after his death, his writings on economic and social issues were compiled under the title Critique sociale (1885).
A biography by G. Geffroy, L’Enfermé (1897), is highly coloured and decidedly partisan.
A biography by G. Geffroy, L’Enfermé (1897), is very vivid and clearly biased.
BLANTYRE, the chief town of the Nyasaland protectorate, British Central Africa. It is situated about 3000 ft. above the sea in the Shiré Highlands 300 m. by river and rail N.N.W. of the Chínde mouth of the Zambezi. Pop. about 6000 natives and 100 whites. It is the headquarters of the principal trading firms and missionary societies in the protectorate. It is also a station on the African trans-continental telegraph line. The chief building is the Church of Scotland church, a fine red brick building, a mixture of Norman and Byzantine styles, with lofty turrets and white domes. It stands in a large open space and is approached by an avenue of cypresses and eucalyptus. The church was built entirely by native labour. Blantyre was founded in 1876 by Scottish missionaries, and is named after the birthplace of David Livingstone.
BLANTYRE, is the main town of the Nyasaland protectorate, British Central Africa. It's located about 3,000 feet above sea level in the Shiré Highlands, 300 miles by river and rail northwest of the Chínde mouth of the Zambezi. The population is around 6,000 locals and 100 white people. It serves as the headquarters for the main trading companies and missionary organizations in the protectorate. It's also a stop on the African transcontinental telegraph line. The most prominent building is the Church of Scotland, a striking red brick structure that combines Norman and Byzantine architectural styles, featuring tall turrets and white domes. It sits in a large open area and is accessed via an avenue lined with cypress and eucalyptus trees. The church was entirely built by local labor. Blantyre was established in 1876 by Scottish missionaries and is named after David Livingstone's birthplace.
BLANTYRE (Gaelic, “the warm retreat”), a parish of Lanarkshire, Scotland. Pop. (1901) 14,145. The parish lies a few miles south-east of Glasgow, and contains High Blantyre (pop. 2521), Blantyre Works (or Low Blantyre), Stonefield and several villages. The whole district is rich in coal, the mining of which is extensively carried on. Blantyre Works (pop. 1683) was the birthplace of David Livingstone (1813-1873) and his brother Charles (1821-1873), who as lads were both employed as piecers in a local cotton-mill. The scanty remains of Blantyre Priory, founded towards the close of the 13th century, stand on the left bank of the Clyde, almost opposite the beautiful ruins of Bothwell Castle. High Blantyre and Blantyre Works are connected with Glasgow by the Caledonian railway. Stonefield (pop. 7288), the most populous place in the parish, entirely occupied with mining, lies between High Blantyre and Blantyre Works, Calderwood Castle on Rotten Calder Water, near High Blantyre, is situated amid picturesque scenery.
BLANTYRE (Gaelic, “the warm retreat”), is a parish in Lanarkshire, Scotland. Population (1901) was 14,145. The parish is located a few miles southeast of Glasgow and includes High Blantyre (population 2,521), Blantyre Works (or Low Blantyre), Stonefield, and several villages. The entire area is rich in coal, which is mined extensively. Blantyre Works (population 1,683) was the birthplace of David Livingstone (1813-1873) and his brother Charles (1821-1873), who both worked as piecers in a local cotton mill when they were young. The remains of Blantyre Priory, established in the late 13th century, are located on the left bank of the Clyde, almost across from the beautiful ruins of Bothwell Castle. High Blantyre and Blantyre Works are linked to Glasgow by the Caledonian railway. Stonefield (population 7,288), the most populated area in the parish, is entirely dedicated to mining and lies between High Blantyre and Blantyre Works. Calderwood Castle on Rotten Calder Water, near High Blantyre, is set in picturesque surroundings.
BLARNEY, a small town of Co. Cork, Ireland, in the mid parliamentary division, 5 m. N.W. of the city of Cork on the Cork & Muskerry light railway. Pop. (1901) 928. There is a large manufacture of tweed. The name “blarney” has passed into the language to denote a peculiar kind of persuasive eloquence, alleged to be characteristic of the natives of Ireland. The “Blarney Stone,” the kissing of which is said to confer this faculty, is pointed out within the castle. The origin of this belief is not known. The castle, built c. 1446 by Cormac McCarthy, was of immense strength, and parts of its walls are as much as 18 ft. thick. To its founder is traced by some the origin of the term “blarney,” since he delayed by persuasion and promises the surrender of the castle to the lord president. Richard Millikin’s song, “The Groves of Blarney” (c. 1798), contributed to the fame of the castle, which is also bound up with the civil history of the county and the War of the Great Rebellion.
BLARNEY, is a small town in County Cork, Ireland, located in the mid-parliamentary division, 5 miles northwest of the city of Cork on the Cork & Muskerry light railway. Its population was 928 in 1901. The town has a significant tweed manufacturing industry. The term “blarney” has entered the language to describe a specific kind of persuasive charm, which is said to be typical of the people of Ireland. The “Blarney Stone,” which people kiss to supposedly gain this ability, is found within the castle. The origins of this belief are unclear. The castle, built around 1446 by Cormac McCarthy, was extremely strong, with some of its walls measuring up to 18 feet thick. Some attribute the origin of the term “blarney” to its founder, as he used persuasion and promises to delay surrendering the castle to the lord president. Richard Millikin’s song, “The Groves of Blarney” (around 1798), helped boost the fame of the castle, which is also linked to the civil history of the county and the War of the Great Rebellion.
BLASHFIELD, EDWIN HOWLAND (1848- ), American artist, was born on the 15th of December 1848 in New York City. He was a pupil of Bonnat in Paris, and became (1888) a member of the National Academy of Design in New York. For some years a genre painter, he later turned to decorative work, marked by rare delicacy and beauty of colouring. He painted mural decorations for a dome in the manufacturers’ building at the Chicago Exposition of 1893; for the dome of the Congressional library, Washington; for the capitol at St Paul, Minnesota; for the Baltimore court-house; in New York City for the Appellate court house, the grand ball-room of the Waldorf-Astoria hotel, the Lawyers’ club, and the residences of W.K. Vanderbilt and Collis P. Huntington; and in Philadelphia for the residence of George W. Drexel. With his wife he wrote Italian Cities (1900) and edited Vasari’s Lives of the Painters (1896), and was well known as a lecturer and writer on art. He became president of the Society of Mural Painters, and of the Society of American Artists.
BLASHFIELD, EDWIN HOWLAND (1848- ), American artist, was born on December 15, 1848, in New York City. He studied under Bonnat in Paris and became a member of the National Academy of Design in New York in 1888. Initially a genre painter, he later shifted to decorative work, distinguished by its rare delicacy and beautiful colors. He created mural decorations for a dome in the manufacturers’ building at the 1893 Chicago Exposition; for the dome of the Congressional Library in Washington; for the Capitol in St. Paul, Minnesota; for the Baltimore courthouse; in New York City for the Appellate courthouse, the grand ballroom of the Waldorf-Astoria hotel, the Lawyers’ Club, and the homes of W.K. Vanderbilt and Collis P. Huntington; and in Philadelphia for the residence of George W. Drexel. Along with his wife, he wrote Italian Cities (1900) and edited Vasari’s Lives of the Painters (1896), and he was well known as a lecturer and writer on art. He became president of the Society of Mural Painters and the Society of American Artists.
BLASIUS (or Blaise), SAINT, bishop of Sebaste or Sivas in Asia Minor, martyred under Diocletian on the 3rd of February 316. The Roman Catholic Church holds his festival on the 3rd of February, the Orthodox Eastern Church on the 11th. His flesh is said to have been torn with woolcombers’ irons before he was beheaded, and this seems to be the only reason why he has always been regarded as the patron saint of woolcombers. In pre-Reformation England St Blaise was a very popular saint, and the council of Oxford in 1222 forbade all work on his festival. Owing to a miracle which he is alleged to have worked on a child suffering from a throat affection, who was brought to him on his way to execution, St Blaise’s aid has always been held potent in throat and lung diseases. The woolcombers of England still celebrate St Blaise’s day with a procession and general festivities. He forms one of a group of fourteen (i.e. twice seven) saints, who for their help in time of need have been associated as objects of particularly devoted worship in Roman Catholic Germany since the middle of the 15th century.
BLASIUS (or Blaise), SAINT, bishop of Sebaste or Sivas in Asia Minor, was martyred under Diocletian on February 3, 316. The Roman Catholic Church celebrates his feast day on February 3, while the Orthodox Eastern Church observes it on the 11th. It is said that his flesh was torn with woolcombers’ irons before he was beheaded, which seems to be the only reason he is considered the patron saint of woolcombers. Before the Reformation, St. Blaise was a very popular saint in England, and the council of Oxford in 1222 prohibited all work on his feast day. Due to a miracle he reportedly performed on a child suffering from a throat condition who was brought to him on his way to execution, St. Blaise’s intercession has always been seen as powerful against throat and lung diseases. Woolcombers in England still celebrate St. Blaise’s day with a procession and general festivities. He is part of a group of fourteen (i.e. twice seven) saints who have been associated as objects of particularly devoted worship in Roman Catholic Germany since the mid-15th century for their help in times of need.
See William Hone, Every Day Book, i. 210.
See William Hone, Every Day Book, i. 210.
BLASPHEMY (through the Fr. from Gr. βλασφημία, profane language, slander, probably derived from root of βλάπτειν, to injure, and φήμη, speech), literally, defamation or evil speaking, but more peculiarly restricted to an indignity offered to the Deity by words or writing. By the Mosaic law death by stoning was the punishment for blasphemy (Lev. xxiv. 16). The 77th Novel of Justinian assigned death as the penalty, as did also the Capitularies. The common law of England treats blasphemy as an indictable offence. All blasphemies against God, as denying His being, or providence, all contumelious reproaches of Jesus Christ, all profane scoffing at the Holy Scriptures, or exposing any part thereof to contempt or ridicule, are punishable by the temporal courts with fine, imprisonment and also infamous corporal punishment. An act of Edward VI. (1547; repealed 44 1553 and revived 1558) enacts that persons reviling the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper, by contemptuous words or otherwise, shall suffer imprisonment. Persons denying the Trinity were deprived of the benefit of the Act of Toleration by an act of 1688. An act of 1697-1698, commonly called the Blasphemy Act, enacts that if any person, educated in or having made profession of the Christian religion, should by writing, preaching, teaching or advised speaking, deny any one of the Persons of the Holy Trinity to be God, or should assert or maintain that there are more gods than one, or should deny the Christian religion to be true, or the Holy Scriptures to be of divine authority, he should, upon the first offence, be rendered incapable of holding any office or place of trust, and for the second incapable of bringing any action, of being guardian or executor, or of taking a legacy or deed of gift, and should suffer three years’ imprisonment without bail. It has been held that a person offending under the statute is also indictable at common law (Rex v. Carlisle, 1819, where Mr Justice Best remarks, “In the age of toleration, when that statute passed, neither churchmen nor sectarians wished to protect in their infidelity those who disbelieved the Holy Scriptures”). An act of 1812-1813 excepts from these enactments “persons denying as therein mentioned respecting the Holy Trinity,” but otherwise the common and the statute law on the subject remain as stated. In the case of Rex v. Woolston (1728) the court declared that they would not suffer it to be debated whether to write against Christianity in general was not an offence punishable in the temporal courts at common law, but they did not intend to include disputes between learned men on particular controverted points.
BLASPHEMY (derived from the French from the Greek blasphemy, meaning profane language or slander, likely originating from the roots of βλάπτειν, which means to injure, and reputation, which means speech), literally refers to defamation or evil speaking, but is more specifically limited to insults directed at God through words or writing. According to Mosaic law, death by stoning was the punishment for blasphemy (Lev. xxiv. 16). The 77th Novel of Justinian also assigned death as the penalty, as did the Capitularies. In England, common law treats blasphemy as an indictable offense. Any blasphemies against God, such as denying His existence or providence, any contemptuous remarks about Jesus Christ, and any profane mockery of the Holy Scriptures, or any attempt to bring part of it into contempt or ridicule, are punishable by temporal courts with fines, imprisonment, and also severe corporal punishment. An act of Edward VI (1547; repealed in 1553 and revived in 1558) states that anyone who insults the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper with contemptuous words or otherwise shall face imprisonment. Those denying the Trinity were excluded from the benefits of the Act of Toleration by an act of 1688. An act from 1697-1698, commonly referred to as the Blasphemy Act, states that if anyone, who was educated in or professed the Christian faith, should deny any Person of the Holy Trinity as God through writing, preaching, teaching, or deliberate speech, or should claim there are multiple gods or deny the truth of the Christian religion or the divine authority of the Holy Scriptures, they would, upon the first offense, lose the ability to hold any office or position of trust, and for the second offense, become incapable of bringing any legal action, serving as a guardian or executor, or accepting a legacy or gift, and would face three years of imprisonment without bail. It has been determined that someone offending under this statute can also be prosecuted under common law (Rex v. Carlisle, 1819, where Mr. Justice Best noted, “In the age of tolerance, when that statute was enacted, neither church leaders nor sectarians sought to protect those who disbelieved the Holy Scriptures”). An act from 1812-1813 excludes from these provisions “persons denying as mentioned regarding the Holy Trinity,” but otherwise, the common law and statutory law on the issue remain as stated. In the case of Rex v. Woolston (1728), the court ruled that they would not allow debate on whether writing against Christianity in general was an offense punishable in temporal courts under common law, but they did not intend to include arguments between scholars on particular disputed issues.
The law against blasphemy has practically ceased to be put in active operation. In 1841 Edward Moxon was found guilty of the publication of a blasphemous libel (Shelley’s Queen Mab), the prosecution having been instituted by Henry Hetherington, who had previously been condemned to four months’ imprisonment for a similar offence, and wished to test the law under which he was punished. In the case of Cowan v. Milbourn (1867) the defendant had broken his contract to let a lecture-room to the plaintiff, on discovering that the intended lectures were to maintain that “the character of Christ is defective, and his teaching misleading, and that the Bible is no more inspired than any other book,” and the court of exchequer held that the publication of such doctrine was blasphemy, and the contract therefore illegal. On that occasion the court reaffirmed the dictum of Chief Justice Hale, that Christianity is part of the laws of England. The commissioners on criminal law (sixth report) remark that “although the law forbids all denial of the being and providence of God or the Christian religion, it is only when irreligion assumes the form of an insult to God and man that the interference of the criminal law has taken place.” In England the last prominent prosecution for blasphemy was the case of R. v. Ramsey & Foote, 1883, 48 L.T. 739, when the editor, publisher and printer of the Freethinker were sentenced to imprisonment; but police court proceedings were taken as late as 1908 against an obscure Hyde Park orator who had become a public nuisance.
The law against blasphemy has pretty much stopped being actively enforced. In 1841, Edward Moxon was convicted for publishing a blasphemous libel (Shelley’s Queen Mab), with the prosecution initiated by Henry Hetherington, who had previously been sentenced to four months in prison for a similar offense and wanted to challenge the law that punished him. In the case of Cowan v. Milbourn (1867), the defendant broke his contract to rent a lecture room to the plaintiff after finding out that the planned lectures would argue that “the character of Christ is flawed, his teachings are misleading, and the Bible is no more inspired than any other book.” The court of exchequer ruled that publishing such beliefs was blasphemy, making the contract illegal. On that occasion, the court reinforced Chief Justice Hale’s statement that Christianity is part of the laws of England. The commissioners on criminal law (sixth report) noted that “although the law prohibits all denial of the existence and providence of God or the Christian religion, it’s only when irreligion becomes an insult to God and man that the criminal law gets involved.” In England, the last major blasphemy prosecution was the case of R. v. Ramsey & Foote in 1883, 48 L.T. 739, when the editor, publisher, and printer of the Freethinker were sentenced to prison; however, police court actions were taken as late as 1908 against an obscure speaker in Hyde Park who had become a public nuisance.
Profane cursing and swearing is made punishable by the Profane Oaths Act 1745, which directs the offender to be brought before a justice of the peace, and fined five shillings, two shillings or one shilling, according as he is a gentleman, below the rank of gentleman, or a common labourer, soldier, &c.
Profane cursing and swearing is punishable under the Profane Oaths Act 1745, which requires the offender to be brought before a justice of the peace and fined five shillings, two shillings, or one shilling, depending on whether they are a gentleman, below the rank of gentleman, or a common laborer, soldier, etc.
By the law of Scotland, as it originally stood, the punishment of blasphemy was death, but by an act of 1825, amended in 1837, blasphemy was made punishable by fine or imprisonment or both.
By the law of Scotland, as it originally was, the punishment for blasphemy was death, but by an act in 1825, updated in 1837, blasphemy became punishable by a fine, imprisonment, or both.
In France, blasphemy (which included, also, speaking against the Holy Virgin and the saints, denying one’s faith, or speaking with impiety of holy things) was from very early times punished with great severity. The punishment was death in various forms, burning alive, mutilation, torture or corporal punishment. In the United States the common law of England was largely followed, and in most of the states, also, statutes were enacted against the offence, but, as in England, the law is practically never put in force. In Germany, the punishment for blasphemy is imprisonment varying from one day to three years, according to the gravity of the offence. To constitute the offence, the blasphemy must be uttered in public, be offensive in character, and have wounded the religious susceptibilities of some other person. In Austria, whoever commits blasphemy by speech or writing is liable to imprisonment for any term from six months up to ten years, according to the seriousness of the offence.
In France, blasphemy (which also included speaking against the Holy Virgin and the saints, denying one’s faith, or disrespecting holy matters) has been heavily punished since ancient times. The consequences could be death in various forms, such as burning alive, mutilation, torture, or other physical punishments. In the United States, the common law of England was mostly adopted, and many states also created laws against this offense, but, similar to England, the law is rarely enforced. In Germany, the punishment for blasphemy ranges from one day to three years in prison, depending on the severity of the offense. To be considered an offense, the blasphemy must be made publicly, be offensive in nature, and have hurt the religious feelings of someone else. In Austria, anyone who commits blasphemy through speech or writing may face imprisonment for a term ranging from six months to ten years, depending on the seriousness of the offense.
BLASS, FRIEDRICH (1843-1907), German classical scholar, was born on the 22nd of January 1843 at Osnabrück. After studying at Göttingen and Bonn from 1860 to 1863, he lectured at several gymnasia and at the university of Königsberg. In 1876 he was appointed extraordinary professor of classical philology at Kiel, and ordinary professor in 1881. In 1892 he accepted a professorship at Halle, where he died on the 5th of March 1907. He frequently visited England, and was intimately acquainted with leading British scholars. He received an honorary degree from Dublin University in 1892, and his readiness to place the results of his labours at the disposal of others, together with the courtesy and kindliness of his disposition, won the respect of all who knew him. Blass is chiefly known for his works in connexion with the study of Greek oratory: Die griechische Beredsamkeit von Alexander bis auf Augustus (1865); Die attische Beredsamkeit (1868-1880; 2nd ed., 1887-1898), his greatest work; editions for the Teubner series of Andocides (1880), Antiphon (1881), Hypereides (1881, 1894), Demosthenes (Dindorf’s ed., 1885), Isocrates (1886), Dinarchus (1888), Demosthenes (Rehdantz’ ed., 1893), Aeschines (1896), Lycurgus, Leocrates (1902); Die Rhythmen der attischen Kunstprosa (1901); Die Rhythmen der asianischen und römischen Kunstprosa (1905). Among his other works are editions of Eudoxus of Cnidus (1887), the Άθηναίων πολιτεία (4th ed., 1903), a work of great importance, and Bacchylides (3rd. ed., 1904); Grammatik des neutestamentlichen Griechisch (1902; Eng. trans, by H. St John Thackeray, 1905); Hermeneutik und Kritik and Paläographie, Buchwesen, und Handschriftenkunde (vol. i. of Müller’s Handbuch der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, 1891); Über die Aussprache des Griechischen (1888; Eng. trans, by W.J. Purton, 1890); Die Interpolationen in der Odyssee (1904); contributions to Collitz’s Sammlung der griechischen Dialektinschriften; editions of the texts of certain portions of the New Testament (Gospels and Acts). His last work was an edition of the Choephori (1906).
BLASS, FRIEDRICH (1843-1907), a German classical scholar, was born on January 22, 1843, in Osnabrück. He studied at Göttingen and Bonn from 1860 to 1863, after which he lectured at several gymnasiums and the university of Königsberg. In 1876, he was appointed as an extraordinary professor of classical philology at Kiel, becoming an ordinary professor in 1881. In 1892, he took a professorship at Halle, where he passed away on March 5, 1907. He often visited England and was closely acquainted with prominent British scholars. He received an honorary degree from Dublin University in 1892, and his willingness to share his research results, along with his courteous and kind nature, earned him the respect of everyone who knew him. Blass is primarily recognized for his contributions to the study of Greek oratory: Die griechische Beredsamkeit von Alexander bis auf Augustus (1865); Die attische Beredsamkeit (1868-1880; 2nd ed., 1887-1898), his most significant work; editions for the Teubner series of Andocides (1880), Antiphon (1881), Hypereides (1881, 1894), Demosthenes (Dindorf’s ed., 1885), Isocrates (1886), Dinarchus (1888), Demosthenes (Rehdantz’ ed., 1893), Aeschines (1896), Lycurgus, Leocrates (1902); Die Rhythmen der attischen Kunstprosa (1901); Die Rhythmen der asianischen und römischen Kunstprosa (1905). Among his other works are editions of Eudoxus of Cnidus (1887), the Αθηναϊκή πολιτεία (4th ed., 1903), a highly important work, and Bacchylides (3rd ed., 1904); Grammatik des neutestamentlichen Griechisch (1902; Eng. trans. by H. St John Thackeray, 1905); Hermeneutik und Kritik and Paläographie, Buchwesen, und Handschriftenkunde (vol. i. of Müller’s Handbuch der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, 1891); Über die Aussprache des Griechischen (1888; Eng. trans. by W.J. Purton, 1890); Die Interpolationen in der Odyssee (1904); contributions to Collitz’s Sammlung der griechischen Dialektinschriften; and editions of certain texts of the New Testament (Gospels and Acts). His final work was an edition of the Choephori (1906).
See notices in the Academy, March 16, 1907 (J.P. Mahaffy); Classical Review, May 1907 (J.E. Sandys), which contains also a review of Die Rhythmen der asianischen und römischen Kunstprosa.
See notices in the Academy, March 16, 1907 (J.P. Mahaffy); Classical Review, May 1907 (J.E. Sandys), which also includes a review of Die Rhythmen der asianischen und römischen Kunstprosa.
BLASTING, the process of rending or breaking apart a solid body, such as rock, by exploding within it or in contact with it some explosive substance. The explosion is accompanied by the sudden development of gas at a high temperature and under a tension sufficiently great to overcome the resistance of the enclosing body, which is thus shattered and disintegrated. Before the introduction of explosives, rock was laboriously excavated by hammer and chisel, or by the ancient process of “fire-setting,” i.e. building a fire against the rock, which, on cooling, splits and flakes off. To hasten disintegration, water was often applied to the heated rock, the loosened portion being afterwards removed by pick or hammer and wedge. In modern times blasting has become a necessity for the excavation of rock and other hard material, as in open surface cuts, quarrying, tunnelling, shaft-sinking and mining operations in general.
BLASTING, is the process of breaking apart a solid material, like rock, by detonating an explosive inside or against it. The explosion creates a large amount of gas at a high temperature and pressure, which is strong enough to break apart the surrounding material, causing it to shatter and fall apart. Before explosives were available, rock was painstakingly removed using hammers and chisels, or by the old technique of “fire-setting,” i.e. making a fire against the rock, which would crack and chip off when it cooled. To speed up the breaking process, water was often poured over the heated rock, allowing the loosened pieces to be removed with a pick, hammer, or wedge. Nowadays, blasting is essential for excavating rock and other tough materials in operations like open surface cuts, quarrying, tunneling, shaft-sinking, and general mining.
For blasting, a hole is generally drilled to receive the charge of explosive. The depth and diameter of the hole and the quantity of explosive used are all variable, depending on the character of the rock and of the explosive, the shape of the mass to be blasted, the presence or absence of cracks or fissures, and the position of the hole with respect to the free surface of the rock. The shock of a blast produces impulsive waves acting radially in all directions, the force being greatest at the centre of explosion and varying inversely as the square of the distance from the charge. This is evidenced by the observed facts. Immediately surrounding the explosive, the rock is often finely splintered and crushed. Beyond this is a zone in which it is completely broken and 45 displaced or projected, leaving an enveloping mass of more or less ragged fractured rock only partially loosened. Lastly, the diminishing waves produce vibrations which are transmitted to considerable distances. Theoretically, if a charge of explosive be fired in a solid material of perfectly homogeneous texture and at a proper distance from the free surface, a conical mass will be blown out to the full depth of the drill hole, leaving a funnel-shaped cavity. No rock, however, is of uniform mineralogical and physical character, so that in practice there is only a rough approximation to the conical crater, even under the most favourable conditions. Generally, the shape of the mass blasted out is extremely irregular, because of the variable texture of the rock and the presence of cracks, fissures and cleavage planes. The ultimate or resultant useful effect of the explosion of a confined charge is in the direction where the least resistance is presented. In the actual work of rock excavation it is only by trial, or by deductions based on experience, that the behaviour of a given rock can be determined and the quantity of explosive required properly proportioned.
For blasting, a hole is usually drilled to hold the charge of explosive. The depth and diameter of the hole, along with the amount of explosive used, can vary based on the type of rock and explosive, the shape of the mass to be blasted, whether there are cracks or fissures, and the position of the hole in relation to the rock's free surface. The shock of a blast creates shockwaves that move outwards in all directions, with the force being strongest at the center of the explosion and decreasing with the square of the distance from the charge. This is clear from observations. Right around the explosive, the rock is often finely shattered and crushed. Beyond that is an area where it is completely broken and displaced or projected, leaving a surrounding mass of more or less ragged fractured rock that is only partially loosened. Lastly, the diminishing waves create vibrations that can be felt over considerable distances. Theoretically, if a charge of explosive is detonated in perfectly homogeneous solid material and at the right distance from the free surface, a conical mass will be blown out to the full depth of the drill hole, creating a funnel-shaped cavity. However, no rock is uniformly composed, which means that in practice, the conical crater is only roughly approximated, even under the best conditions. Typically, the shape of the blasted mass is very irregular due to the varying texture of the rock and the presence of cracks, fissures, and cleavage planes. The ultimate effective outcome of an explosion from a confined charge is directed towards the path of least resistance. In actual rock excavation work, it's only through trial or by making deductions based on experience that one can determine how a specific rock will behave and how much explosive is needed.
Blasting, as usually carried on, comprises several operations: (1) drilling holes in the rock to be blasted; (2) placing in the hole the charge of explosive, with its fuze; (3) tamping the charge, i.e. compacting it and filling the remainder of the hole with some suitable material for preventing the charge from blowing out without breaking the ground; (4) igniting or detonating the charge; (5) clearing away the broken material. The holes for blasting are made either by hand, with hammer and drill or jumper, or by machine drill, the latter being driven by steam, compressed air, or electricity, or, in rare cases, by hydraulic power. Drill holes ordinarily vary in diameter from 1 to 3 in., and in depth from a few inches up to 15 or 20 ft. or more. The deeper holes are made only in surface excavation of rock, the shallower, to a maximum depth of say 12 ft., being suitable for tunnelling and mining operations.
Blasting, as usually done, involves several steps: (1) drilling holes in the rock to be blasted; (2) placing the explosive charge and its fuse in the hole; (3) tamping the charge, meaning compacting it and filling the rest of the hole with suitable material to prevent the charge from blowing out without breaking the ground; (4) igniting or detonating the charge; (5) clearing away the broken material. The holes for blasting are made either by hand, using a hammer and drill or jumper, or by machine drill, which can be powered by steam, compressed air, electricity, or, in rare cases, hydraulic power. Drill holes typically range from 1 to 3 inches in diameter and from a few inches to 15 or 20 feet deep or more. Deeper holes are usually only made in surface excavation of rock, while shallower holes, with a maximum depth of about 12 feet, are suitable for tunneling and mining operations.
![]() |
Fig. 1. |
Hand Drilling.—The work is either “single-hand” or “double-hand.” In single-hand drilling, the miner wields the hammer with one hand, and with the other holds the drill or “bit,” rotating it slightly after every blow in order to keep the hole round and prevent the drill from sticking fast; in double-hand work, one man strikes, while the other holds and rotates the drill. For large and deep holes, two hammermen are sometimes employed.
Hand Drilling.—The work is either “single-hand” or “double-hand.” In single-hand drilling, the miner uses one hand to hold the hammer and the other to hold the drill or “bit,” rotating it a little after each hit to keep the hole round and avoid the drill getting stuck; in double-hand work, one person strikes while the other holds and rotates the drill. For larger and deeper holes, sometimes two hammermen are used.
![]() |
Fig. 2.—Sledge-hammer. |
A miner’s drill is a steel bar, occasionally round but generally of octagonal cross-section, one end of which is forged out to a cutting edge (fig. 1). The edge of the drill is made either straight, like that of a chisel, or with a convex curve, the latter shape being best for very hard rock. For hard rock the cutting edge should be rather thicker and blunter, and therefore stronger, than for soft rock. Drills are made of high-grade steel, as they must be tempered accurately and uniformly. The diameter of drill steel for hand work is usually from ¾ to 1 in., and the length of cutting edge, or gauge, of the drill is always greater than the diameter of the shank, in the proportion of from 7.4 to 4.3. Holes over 10 or 12 in. deep generally require the use of a set of drills of different lengths and depending in number on the depth required. The shortest drill, for starting the hole, has the widest cutting edge, the edges of the others being successively narrower and graduated to follow each other properly, as drill after drill is dulled in deepening the hole. Thus the hole decreases in diameter as it is made deeper. The miner’s hammer (fig. 2) ranges in weight from 3½ to 4½ ℔ for single-hand drilling, up to 8 or 10 ℔ for double-hand. If the hole is directed downward, a little water is poured into it at intervals, to keep the cutting edge of the drill cool and make a thin mud of the cuttings. From time to time the hole is cleaned out by the “scraper” or “spoon,” a long slender iron bar, forged in the shape of a hollow semi-cylinder, with one end flattened and turned over at right angles. If the hole is directed steeply upward and the rock is dry, the cuttings will run out continuously during the drilling; otherwise the scraper is necessary, or a small pipe with a plunger like a syringe is used for washing out the cuttings. The “jumper” is a long steel bar, with cutting edges on one or both ends, which is alternately raised and dropped in the hole by one or two men. In rock work the jumper is rarely used except for holes directed steeply downward, though for coal or soft shale or slate it may be employed for drilling holes horizontally or upward. Other tools used in connexion with rock-drilling are the pick and gad.
A miner's drill is a steel bar, sometimes round but usually octagonal in shape, with one end shaped into a cutting edge (fig. 1). The edge can be straight, like a chisel, or have a convex curve, which is better for very hard rock. For hard rock, the cutting edge should be thicker and blunter, making it stronger than for soft rock. Drills are made from high-quality steel because they need to be tempered precisely and consistently. The diameter of drill steel for hand use is typically between ¾ to 1 inch, and the length of the cutting edge, or gauge, is always longer than the shank diameter, proportionally ranging from 7.4 to 4.3. Holes deeper than 10 or 12 inches usually require a set of drills of varying lengths, with the number depending on the required depth. The shortest drill, used for starting the hole, has the widest cutting edge, while the edges of the other drills are successively narrower, designed to follow each other as they become dull during drilling. As a result, the hole narrows as it gets deeper. The miner's hammer (fig. 2) weighs between 3½ to 4½ pounds for single-hand drilling and can go up to 8 or 10 pounds for double-hand use. If the hole is drilled downward, water is occasionally added to keep the drill's cutting edge cool and create a thin mud from the rock cuttings. The hole is periodically cleaned out with a “scraper” or “spoon,” which is a long, slim iron bar shaped like a hollow semi-cylinder, with one end flattened and bent at a right angle. If the hole is angled steeply upward and the rock is dry, the cuttings will continuously flow out while drilling; if not, the scraper is used, or a small pipe with a plunger like a syringe is employed to flush out the cuttings. The “jumper” is a long steel bar that has cutting edges on one or both ends and is alternately raised and dropped in the hole by one or two people. In rock work, the jumper is rarely used except for holes drilled steeply downward, but it may be used for drilling horizontally or upward in coal, soft shale, or slate. Other tools associated with rock drilling include the pick and gad.
![]() |
Fig. 3.—Ingersoll-Sergeant Mining Drill. |
Holes drilled by hand usually vary in depth from say 18 to 36 in., according to the nature of the rock and purpose of the work, though deeper holes are often made. For soft rock, single-hand drilling is from 20 to 30% cheaper than double-hand, but this difference does not hold good for the harder rocks. For these double-hand drilling is preferable, and may even be essential, to secure a reasonable speed of work.
Holes drilled by hand typically range in depth from about 18 to 36 inches, depending on the type of rock and the purpose of the job, although deeper holes are often created. For soft rock, single-handed drilling is about 20 to 30% cheaper than double-handed drilling, but this cost difference doesn't apply to harder rocks. For those, double-handed drilling is usually better and may even be necessary to maintain a decent work pace.
Machine Drills.—The introduction of machine drills in the latter part of the 19th century exerted an important influence on the work of rock excavation in general, and specially on the art of mining. By their use many great tunnels and other works involving rock excavation under adverse conditions have been rapidly and successfully carried out. Before the invention of machine drills such work progressed slowly and with difficulty. Nearly all machine drills are of the reciprocating or percussive type, in which the drill bit is firmly clamped to the piston rod and delivers a rapid succession of strong blows on the bottom of the hole. The ordinary compressed air drill (which may, for surface work, be operated also by steam) may be taken as an illustration. The piston works in a cylinder, provided with a valve motion somewhat similar to that of a steam-engine, together with an automatic device for producing the necessary rotation of the piston and drill bit. While at work the machine is mounted on a heavy tripod (fig. 3); or, if underground, sometimes on an iron column or bar, firmly wedged in position between the roof and floor, or side walls, of the tunnel or mine working. As the hole is deepened, the entire drill head is gradually fed forward on its support by a screw feed, a succession of longer and longer drill bits being used as required.
Machine Drills.—The introduction of machine drills in the late 19th century had a significant impact on rock excavation work overall, especially in mining. Their use allowed for the rapid and successful completion of many large tunnels and other projects involving rock excavation under challenging conditions. Before machine drills were invented, such work progressed slowly and with great difficulty. Most machine drills operate on a reciprocating or percussive principle, where the drill bit is securely attached to the piston rod and delivers a quick series of strong blows to the bottom of the hole. A typical example is the compressed air drill (which can also be powered by steam for surface work). The piston moves inside a cylinder with a valve system similar to a steam engine, along with an automatic mechanism that generates the necessary rotation of the piston and drill bit. While in operation, the machine is mounted on a sturdy tripod (fig. 3), or, when underground, it may be placed on an iron column or bar that is securely wedged between the roof and floor, or the side walls of the tunnel or mine. As the hole gets deeper, the entire drill head is gradually pushed forward on its support by a screw feed, using a series of longer drill bits as needed.
Among the numerous types and makes of percussion drill may be named the following:—Adelaide, Climax, Darlington, Dubois-François, Ferroux, Froelich, Hirnant, Ingersoll, Jeffrey, Leyner, McKiernan, Rand, Schram, Sergeant, Sullivan and Wood.
Among the many types and brands of percussion drills, the following can be mentioned: Adelaide, Climax, Darlington, Dubois-François, Ferroux, Froelich, Hirnant, Ingersoll, Jeffrey, Leyner, McKiernan, Rand, Schram, Sergeant, Sullivan, and Wood.
![]() |
Figs. 4 and 5.—Darlington’s Rock Drill. |
One of the simplest of the machine drills is the Darlington (figs. 4 and 5): a is the cylinder; b, piston rod; c, bit; d, d, air inlets, either being used according to the position of the drill while at work; h, piston; j, rifle-bar for rotating piston and bit; k, ratchet attached to j; l, brass nut, screwed into h, and in which j works; f, chuck for holding drill-bit; n, air port communicating between ends of cylinder, front and back of piston; o, exhaust port. This machine has no valve. From its construction, the compressed air (or steam) is always acting on the annular shoulder round the forward end of the piston. The piston is thereby forced back on the 46 in-stroke until the port n is uncovered. This admits the compressed air to the rear end of the cylinder, and as the area of this end of the piston is much greater than that of the shoulder on the other end, the piston is driven forward and strikes its blow. When it has advanced far enough to cover the exhaust port o, the air behind the piston is exhausted, and, under the constant inward pressure noted above, the stroke is reversed. The rotation of piston and bit is caused by the rifle-bar j. On the outward stroke, j, with its ratchet k, is free to turn under a couple of pawls and springs, and consequently the piston delivers its blow without rotation. On the inward stroke the ratchet is held fast by the pawls, and the piston and bit are forced to rotate through a small part of a revolution. The cylinder is fed forward with respect to the shell r, by rotating the handle p, which works a long screw-bar engaging with a nut on the under side of the cylinder. The shell r is bolted to the clamp s, which in turn is mounted on the hollow column or bar g, or on a tripod, according to the character of the work. By means of the adjustable clamp s, the machine can be set for drilling a hole in any desired direction. The drill makes from 400 to 800 strokes per minute.
One of the simplest machine drills is the Darlington (figs. 4 and 5): a is the cylinder; b is the piston rod; c is the bit; d and d are air inlets, used based on the drill's position during operation; h is the piston; j is the rifle-bar for rotating the piston and bit; k is the ratchet attached to j; l is the brass nut screwed into h, where j operates; f is the chuck for holding the drill bit; n is the air port connecting the front and back ends of the cylinder with the piston; o is the exhaust port. This machine has no valve. Due to its design, the compressed air (or steam) continuously acts on the annular shoulder around the front end of the piston. This pushes the piston back on the in-stroke until the port n is uncovered. This allows the compressed air to enter the back end of the cylinder, and since the area of this end of the piston is much larger than that of the shoulder on the other end, the piston is pushed forward and delivers its blow. Once it moves far enough to cover the exhaust port o, the air behind the piston is released, and, under the constant inward pressure mentioned earlier, the stroke is reversed. The rotation of the piston and bit is driven by the rifle-bar j. During the outward stroke, j, along with its ratchet k, can turn freely under a pair of pawls and springs, allowing the piston to hit without rotating. On the inward stroke, the ratchet is held in place by the pawls, forcing the piston and bit to rotate slightly. The cylinder advances relative to the shell r by rotating the handle p, which operates a long screw-bar that engages with a nut underneath the cylinder. The shell r is secured to the clamp s, which is mounted on the hollow column or bar g, or on a tripod, depending on the job. Through the adjustable clamp s, the machine can be set to drill a hole in any desired direction. The drill makes between 400 to 800 strokes per minute.
The “New Ingersoll” drill, which may be taken as an example of the numerous machines in which valves are used, is shown in section in fig. 6. The steam or compressed air is distributed through the ports alternately to the ends of the cylinder, by the reciprocations of a spool-valve working in a chest mounted on the cylinder. The movements of this valve are caused by the strokes of the main piston, which, by means of the wide annular groove around the middle of the piston, alternately open and close the spool-valve exhaust ports. Fig. 3 shows the Ingersoll “Light Mining drill,” as mounted on a tripod, and in position for drilling a hole vertically downward. In the Leyner drill the drill-bit is not connected to the piston, but is struck a quick succession of blows by the latter. An important feature of this machine is the provision for directing a stream of water into the hole for clearing out the cuttings. For this purpose the shank of the drill-bit is perforated longitudinally, the water being supplied under pressure from a small tank, to which compressed air is led.
The "New Ingersoll" drill, which serves as an example of the many machines that use valves, is shown in section in fig. 6. Steam or compressed air is alternately distributed through the ports to the ends of the cylinder by the back-and-forth motion of a spool valve that works in a chest mounted on the cylinder. The movements of this valve are triggered by the strokes of the main piston, which, thanks to the wide annular groove around its middle, alternately opens and closes the spool valve’s exhaust ports. Fig. 3 displays the Ingersoll "Light Mining Drill," set up on a tripod for drilling a hole straight down. In the Leyner drill, the drill bit isn't connected to the piston but is hit with a quick series of blows from it. A key feature of this machine is its ability to direct a stream of water into the hole to clear out the cuttings. For this purpose, the shank of the drill bit is drilled with holes along its length, with water being supplied under pressure from a small tank that is connected to the compressed air source.
A rock drill of entirely different design, the Brandt, has been successfully used in Europe for driving railway tunnels. It is operated by hydraulic power, the pressure water being supplied by a pump. The hollow drill-bit, which has a serrated cutting edge, is forced under heavy pressure against the bottom of the hole, and is rotated slowly—at six to eight revolutions per minute—by a pair of small hydraulic cylinders, thus grinding and crushing the rock instead of chipping it. The bottom of the hole is kept clean and the drill-bit cooled by a stream of water passing down through its hollow shank. On account of its size and weight, this machine is not suitable for mine work.
A completely different type of rock drill, the Brandt, has been successfully used in Europe for creating railway tunnels. It runs on hydraulic power, with pressurized water provided by a pump. The hollow drill bit, which has a serrated cutting edge, is forced against the bottom of the hole under heavy pressure and is rotated slowly—at six to eight revolutions per minute—by a pair of small hydraulic cylinders, grinding and crushing the rock instead of chipping it. A stream of water flows through its hollow shank to keep the bottom of the hole clean and cool the drill bit. Due to its size and weight, this machine isn’t suitable for mining work.
![]() |
Fig. 6.—New Ingersoll Drill. |
Most of the machine drills are made in a number of sizes, from 2 in. up to 5 in. diameter of cylinder, the larger sizes being capable of drilling holes 5 in. diameter and 30 ft. deep. They range in weight from say 95 to 690 ℔ for the drill head (unmounted), the tripods weighing from 40 to 260 ℔, exclusive of the weights placed for stability on the tripod legs (fig. 3). The sizes in most common use for mining are from 2½ in. to 31⁄8 in. diameter of cylinder. In rock of average hardness the best drills make from 4 to 7.5 linear ft. of hole per hour. For use in narrow veins, or other confined workings underground, several extremely small and light compressed air drills have been introduced, as, for example, the Franke and Wonder, the first of which weighs complete only 16 ℔, and the second 18 ℔ These drills are held in the hands of the miner in the required position, and strike a rapid succession of light blows. A large number of mechanical drills operated by hand power have been invented. Some imitate hand-drilling in the mode of delivering the blow; in others the drill-bit is caused to reciprocate by means of combinations of crank and spring. None of these machines is entirely satisfactory, and but few are in use.
Most machine drills come in various sizes, ranging from 2 inches to 5 inches in diameter, with the larger sizes capable of drilling holes up to 5 inches wide and 30 feet deep. Their weights vary from about 95 to 690 pounds for the drill head (unmounted), and the tripods weigh between 40 to 260 pounds, not including the additional weights placed for stability on the tripod legs (fig. 3). The most commonly used sizes for mining are between 2½ inches and 3 1⁄8 inches in diameter. In rock of average hardness, the best drills can create between 4 to 7.5 linear feet of hole per hour. For narrow veins or other tight spaces underground, several very small and lightweight compressed air drills have been introduced, such as the Franke and Wonder, the first of which weighs only 16 pounds complete, and the second weighs 18 pounds. These drills are held by the miner in the required position and deliver a rapid succession of light blows. Many mechanical drills powered by hand have been developed. Some mimic hand-drilling in how they deliver the blow, while others use a combination of crank and spring to make the drill-bit reciprocate. However, none of these machines is completely satisfactory, and only a few are in use.
Among percussion rock-drills operated by electricity are the Bladray, Box, Durkee, Marvin and Siemens-Halske. The Marvin drill works with a solenoid; most of the others have crank and spring movements for producing the reciprocations of the piston. Power is furnished by a small electric motor, either mounted on the machine itself, as with the Box drill, or more often standing on the ground and transmitting its power through a flexible shaft. Although rather frequently used, electric percussion drills cannot yet be considered entirely successful, at least for mine service, in competition with compressed air machines. Another type of electric drill, however, has been successfully used in collieries, viz. rotary auger drills, mounted on light columns and driven through gearing by diminutive motors. These are intended for boring in coal, slate or other similar soft material. Hand augers resembling a carpenter’s brace and bit are also often used in collieries.
Among electric percussion rock drills are the Bladray, Box, Durkee, Marvin, and Siemens-Halske. The Marvin drill operates with a solenoid, while most of the others use crank and spring movements to create the piston’s back-and-forth motion. Power comes from a small electric motor, either attached to the machine itself, like the Box drill, or more commonly placed on the ground and transmitting power through a flexible shaft. While they are used quite often, electric percussion drills can't yet be seen as completely successful, at least for mining services, when compared to compressed air machines. However, another type of electric drill has been effectively used in coal mines: rotary auger drills mounted on lightweight columns, powered through gears by small motors. These are designed for boring into coal, slate, or other similar soft materials. Hand augers, which look like a carpenter’s brace and bit, are also frequently used in coal mines.
Whatever may be the method of drilling, after the hole has been completed to the depth required, it is finally cleaned out by a scraper or swab; or, when compressed air drills are used, by a jet of air directed into the hole by a short piece of pipe connected through a flexible hose with the compressed air supply pipe. The hole is then ready for the charge.
No matter what drilling method is used, once the hole is completed to the required depth, it is cleaned out with a scraper or swab; or, if compressed air drills are used, with a jet of air directed into the hole through a short piece of pipe attached via a flexible hose to the compressed air supply. The hole is then prepared for the charge.
![]() | |
Fig. 7. | Fig. 8. |
Location and Arrangement of Holes.—For hand drilling in mining the position of the holes is determined largely by the character and shape of the face of rock to be blasted. The miner observes the joints and cracks of the rock, placing the holes to take advantage of them and so obtain the best result from the blast. In driving a tunnel or drift, as in figs. 7 and 8, the rock joints can be made of material assistance by beginning with hole No. 1 and following in succession by Nos. 2, 3 and 4. Frequently the ore, or vein matter, is separated from the wall-rock by a thin, soft layer of clay (D, D, fig. 8). This would act almost as a free face, and the first holes of the round would be directed at an angle towards it, for blasting out a wedge; after which the positions of the other holes would be chosen.
Location and Arrangement of Holes.—For hand drilling in mining, the placement of the holes is largely determined by the type and shape of the rock face that needs to be blasted. The miner examines the joints and cracks in the rock, positioning the holes to take advantage of these features to achieve the best results from the blast. When driving a tunnel or drift, as illustrated in figs. 7 and 8, the rock joints can be very helpful by starting with hole No. 1 and then proceeding with Nos. 2, 3, and 4 in order. Often, the ore or vein material is separated from the wall rock by a thin, soft layer of clay (D, D, fig. 8). This layer acts almost like a free face, and the first holes of the round would be aimed at an angle toward it, to blast out a wedge; after that, the positions of the other holes would be determined.
![]() | |
Fig. 9. | Fig. 10. |
When machine drills are employed, less attention is given to natural cracks or joints, chiefly because when the drill is once set up several holes at different angles can be drilled in succession by merely swinging the cylinder of the machine into a new position with respect to its mounting. According to one method, the holes are placed with some degree of symmetry, in roughly concentric rings, as shown by figs. 9 and 10. The centre holes are blasted first, and are followed by the others in one or more volleys as indicated by the dotted lines. Another method is the “centre cut,” in which the holes are drilled in parallel rows on each side of the centre line of the tunnel, drift or shaft. Those in the two rows nearest the middle are directed towards each other, and enclose a prism of rock, which is first blasted put by heavy charges, after which the rows of side holes will break with relatively light charges.
When using machine drills, less focus is placed on natural cracks or joints, mainly because once the drill is set up, multiple holes at various angles can be drilled one after the other just by pivoting the drill's cylinder into a new position relative to its mount. In one method, the holes are arranged with some symmetry, forming roughly concentric rings, as illustrated in figs. 9 and 10. The center holes are blasted first, followed by the others in one or more rounds as indicated by the dotted lines. Another method is the “center cut,” where holes are drilled in parallel rows on either side of the tunnel, drift, or shaft's center line. The holes in the two rows closest to the center point towards each other, surrounding a prism of rock, which is first blasted out with heavy charges, and then the side holes are broken with relatively lighter charges.
Explosives.—A great variety of explosives are in use for blasting purposes. Up to 1864, gunpowder was the only available explosive, but in that year Alfred Nobel first applied nitroglycerin for blasting, and in 1867 invented dynamite. This name was originally applied to his mixture of nitroglycerin with kieselguhr, but now includes also other mechanical mixtures or chemical compounds which develop a high explosive force as compared with gunpowder. Besides these there are the so-called flameless or safety explosives, used in collieries where inflammable gases are given off from the coal.
Explosives.—A wide range of explosives is used for blasting. Until 1864, gunpowder was the only explosive available, but that year Alfred Nobel introduced nitroglycerin for blasting, and in 1867, he invented dynamite. This name was initially given to his mixture of nitroglycerin and kieselguhr, but it now also includes other mechanical mixtures or chemical compounds that produce a high explosive force compared to gunpowder. In addition to these, there are so-called flameless or safety explosives, used in coal mines where flammable gases are released from the coal.
Gunpowder, or black powder, is seldom used for rock-blasting, except in quarrying building-stone, where slow explosives of relatively low power are desirable to avoid shattering the stone, and in such collieries as do not require the use of safety explosives. Gunpowder is exploded by deflagration, by means of a fuze, and exerts a comparatively slow and rending force. The high explosives, on the other hand, are exploded by detonation, through the agency of a fuze and fulminating cap, exerting a quick, shattering, rather than a rending force. Dynamites and flameless explosives are made in a variety of strengths, and are packed in waterproofed cartridges of different sizes. The grades of dynamite most commonly employed contain from 35 to 60% of nitroglycerin; the stronger are used for tough rock or deep holes, or for holes unfavourably placed in narrow mine workings, as sometimes in shaft-sinking or tunnelling. When of good quality high explosives are safer to handle than gunpowder, 47 as they cannot be ignited by sparks and are not so easily exploded. The ordinary dynamites used in mining are about four times as powerful as gunpowder.
Gunpowder, or black powder, is rarely used for rock-blasting, except in quarrying building stone, where slow explosives of relatively low power are preferred to prevent shattering the stone, and in certain coal mines that don’t need safety explosives. Gunpowder explodes through deflagration using a fuse, producing a relatively slow and tearing force. In contrast, high explosives are detonated via a fuse and fulminating cap, delivering a fast, shattering force instead of a tearing one. Dynamites and flameless explosives come in various strengths and are packed into waterproof cartridges of different sizes. The most commonly used grades of dynamite contain between 35% to 60% nitroglycerin; the stronger variants are used for hard rock, deep holes, or in challenging locations within narrow mine workings, such as during shaft-sinking or tunneling. When of good quality, high explosives are safer to handle than gunpowder, as they can’t be ignited by sparks and are less prone to accidental detonation. The standard dynamites used in mining are about four times as powerful as gunpowder.
Nitroglycerin in its liquid form is now rarely used for blasting, partly because its full strength is not often necessary but chiefly because of the difficulty and danger of transporting, handling and charging it. If employed at all, it is charged in thin tinned plate cases or rubber-cloth cartridges.
Nitroglycerin in liquid form is now seldom used for blasting, mainly because its full power isn’t usually needed, but also because it’s difficult and dangerous to transport, handle, and load. When it is used, it's packed in thin metal cases or rubber-coated cartridges.
Blasting with Black Powder.—The powder is coarse-grained, usually from 1⁄8 to 3⁄16 in. in size, and is charged in paper cartridges, 8 to 10 in. long and of a proper diameter to fit loosely in the drill hole. A piece of fuze, long enough to reach a little beyond the mouth of the hole, is inserted in the cartridge and tied fast. For wet holes paraffined paper is used, the miner waterproofing the joints with grease. When more than one cartridge is required for the blast, that which has the fuze attached is usually charged last. The cartridges are carefully rammed down by a wooden tamping bar and the remainder of the hole filled with tamping. This consists of finely broken rock, dry clay or other comminuted material, carefully compacted by the tamping bar on top of the charge. The fuze is a cord, having in the centre a core of gunpowder, enclosed in several layers of linen or hemp waterproofed covering. It is ignited by the miner’s candle or lamp, or by a candle end so placed at the mouth of the hole that the flame must burn its way through the fuze covering. As the fuze burns slowly, at the rate of 2 or 3 ft. per minute, the miner uses a sufficient length to allow him to reach a place of safety.
Blasting with Black Powder.—The powder is coarsely grained, usually between 1⁄8 and 3⁄16 inches in size, and is loaded in paper cartridges that are 8 to 10 inches long and of a suitable diameter to fit loosely in the drill hole. A piece of fuse, long enough to extend slightly beyond the mouth of the hole, is inserted into the cartridge and secured tightly. For wet holes, paraffined paper is used, and the miner waterproofs the joints with grease. If more than one cartridge is needed for the blast, the one with the fuse is typically loaded last. The cartridges are carefully pressed down using a wooden tamping bar, and the rest of the hole is filled with tamping material, which consists of finely crushed rock, dry clay, or other pulverized material, compacted firmly with the tamping bar on top of the charge. The fuse is a cord that contains a center core of gunpowder, enclosed in multiple layers of waterproof linen or hemp. It is ignited by the miner’s candle or lamp, or by a candle stub placed at the mouth of the hole so that the flame must burn its way through the fuse covering. As the fuse burns slowly, at a rate of 2 to 3 feet per minute, the miner uses a long enough length to ensure he can reach a safe distance.
For blasting in coal, “squibs” instead of fuzes are often used. A squib is simply a tiny paper rocket, about 1⁄8 in. diameter by 3 in. long, containing fine gunpowder and having a sulphur slow-match at one end. It is fired into the charge through a channel in the tamping. This channel may be formed by a piece of ¼ in. gas pipe, tamped in the hole and reaching the charge; or a “needle,” a long taper iron rod, is laid longitudinally in the hole, with its point entering the charge, and after the tamping is finished, by carefully withdrawing the needle a little channel is left, through which the squib is fired. In this connexion it may be noted that for breaking ground in gassy collieries several substitutes for explosives have been used to a limited extent, e.g. plugs of dry wood driven tightly into a row of drill holes, and which on being wetted swell and split the coal; quicklime cartridges, which expand powerfully on the application of water; simple wedges, driven by hammer into the drill holes; multiple wedges, inserted in the holes and operated by hydraulic pressure from a small hand force-pump.
For blasting in coal, “squibs” are often used instead of fuses. A squib is just a small paper rocket, about 1⁄8 inches in diameter and 3 inches long, filled with fine gunpowder and has a slow-burning sulfur match at one end. It's fired into the charge through a channel in the tamping. This channel can be made using a piece of ¼-inch gas pipe, tamped in the hole and reaching the charge; or a “needle,” a long tapered iron rod, is placed lengthwise in the hole, with its point entering the charge. After tamping is complete, the needle is carefully pulled out, leaving a small channel through which the squib is fired. In this context, it’s worth mentioning that to break ground in gassy collieries, several alternatives to explosives have been used to some extent, such as plugs of dry wood tightly driven into a row of drill holes, which swell and split the coal when wetted; quicklime cartridges that expand forcefully when water is applied; simple wedges hammered into the drill holes; and multiple wedges inserted in the holes that are operated by hydraulic pressure from a small hand pump.
Blasting with High Explosives.—High explosives are fired either by ordinary fuze and detonating cap or by electric fuze. Detonating caps of ordinary strength contain 10 to 15 grains of fulminating mixture. The cap is crimped tight on the end of the fuze, embedded in the cartridge, and on being exploded by fire from the fuze detonates the charge. The number of cartridges charged depends on the depth of hole, the length of the line of least resistance, and the toughness and other characteristics of the rock. Each cartridge should be solidly tamped, and, to avoid waste spaces in the hole, which would reduce the effect of the blast, it is customary to split the paper covering lengthwise with a knife. This allows the dynamite to spread under the pressure of the tamping bar. The cap is often placed in the cartridge preceding the last one charged, but it is better to insert it last, in a piece of cartridge called a “primer.” Though the dynamites are not exploded by sparks, they should nevertheless always be handled carefully. It is not so essential to fill the hole completely and so thoroughly to compact the tamping, as in charging black powder, because of the greater rapidity and shattering force of the explosion of dynamite; tamping, however, should never be omitted, as it increases the efficiency of the blast. In exploding dynamite, strong caps, containing say 15 grains of fulminating powder, produce the best results. Weaker caps are not economical, as they do not produce complete detonation of the dynamite. This is specially true if the weather be cold. Dynamite then becomes less sensitive, and the cartridges should be gently warmed before charging, to a temperature of not more than 80° F. Poisonous fumes are often produced by the explosion of the nitroglycerin compounds. These are probably largely due to incomplete detonation, by which part of the nitroglycerin is vaporized or merely burned. This is most likely to occur when the dynamite is chilled, or of poor quality, or when the cap is too weak. There is generally but little inconvenience from the fumes, except in confined underground workings, where ventilation is imperfect.
Blasting with High Explosives.—High explosives can be detonated using either a regular fuse with a detonating cap or an electric fuse. Standard detonating caps contain 10 to 15 grains of a fulminating mixture. The cap is securely crimped onto the end of the fuse and embedded in the cartridge, and when ignited by the fuse, it detonates the charge. The number of cartridges used depends on the hole's depth, the length of the line of least resistance, and the strength and characteristics of the rock. Each cartridge should be firmly tamped, and to prevent air pockets in the hole—which can lessen the blast's effect—it's common to split the paper covering lengthwise with a knife. This lets the dynamite spread out when pressed by the tamping bar. The cap is usually placed in the cartridge just before the last one filled, but it's better to insert it last in a piece of cartridge known as a “primer.” Although dynamites are not set off by sparks, they should always be handled carefully. It's not as critical to fill the hole completely or compact the tamping as it is with black powder, due to the quicker and more forceful explosion of dynamite; however, tamping should never be skipped, as it boosts the blast's effectiveness. For detonating dynamite, strong caps containing around 15 grains of fulminating powder yield the best outcomes. Weaker caps are inefficient, as they don't fully detonate the dynamite, especially in cold weather. In such cases, dynamite becomes less sensitive, and the cartridges should be gently warmed before charging to a maximum temperature of 80° F. Explosions of nitroglycerin compounds often produce poisonous fumes, likely due to incomplete detonation that vaporizes or simply burns part of the nitroglycerin. This is more likely to happen when the dynamite is cold, of poor quality, or if the cap is too weak. Generally, fumes cause little trouble except in confined underground spaces, where ventilation is inadequate.
Like nitroglycerin, the common dynamites freeze at a temperature of from 42° to 46° F. They are then comparatively safe, and so far as possible should be transported in the frozen state. At very low temperatures dynamite again becomes somewhat sensitive to shock. When it is frozen at ordinary temperatures even the strongest detonating caps fail to develop the full force. In thawing dynamite, care must be exercised. The fact that a small quantity will often burn quietly has led to the dangerously mistaken notion that mere heating will not cause explosion. It is chiefly a question of temperature. If the quantity ignited by flame be large enough to heat the entire mass to the detonating point (say 360° F.) before all is consumed, an explosion will result. Furthermore, dynamite, when even moderately heated, becomes extremely sensitive to shocks. There are several accepted modes of thawing dynamite: (1) In a water bath, the cartridges being placed in a vessel surrounded on the sides and bottom by warm water contained in a larger enclosing vessel. The warm water may be renewed from time to time, or the water bath placed over a candle or small lamp, not on a stove. (2) In two vessels, similar to the above, with the space between them occupied by air, provided the heat applied can be definitely limited, as by using a candle. (3) When large quantities of dynamite are used a supply may be kept on shelves in a wooden room or chamber, warmed by a stove, or by a coil of pipe heated by exhaust steam from an engine. Live steam should not be used, as the heat might become excessive. Thawing should always take place slowly, never before an open fire or by direct contact with a stove or steam pipes and care must be taken that the heat does not rise high enough to cause sweating or exudation of liquid nitroglycerin from the cartridges, which would be a source of danger.
Like nitroglycerin, regular dynamite freezes at temperatures between 42° and 46° F. When frozen, they are relatively safe, and it's best to transport them in this state. However, at very low temperatures, dynamite can become sensitive to shock again. When it’s frozen at normal temperatures, even the strongest detonating caps don’t unleash their full potential. Extra caution is necessary when thawing dynamite. The fact that a small amount may burn quietly has led to the dangerously wrong belief that just heating it won’t cause an explosion. It really comes down to temperature. If there’s enough material ignited by flames to heat the entire mass to the detonating point (around 360° F) before it’s all consumed, an explosion can happen. Additionally, dynamite becomes extremely sensitive to shocks when heated even moderately. There are several accepted methods for thawing dynamite: (1) In a water bath, where the cartridges are placed in a container surrounded on all sides by warm water in a larger vessel. The warm water can be replaced occasionally, or the water bath can be placed over a candle or small lamp, not on a stove. (2) In two vessels like the first method, with the space between them filled with air, as long as the heat can be controlled, like using a candle. (3) When large amounts of dynamite are needed, it can be stored on shelves in a wooden room or chamber warmed by a stove or by a coil of pipe heated with exhaust steam from an engine. Live steam should be avoided, as the heat could become too intense. Thawing should always be done slowly, never in front of an open flame or by direct contact with a stove or steam pipes, and care must be taken to ensure the heat doesn’t get high enough to cause sweating or leaking of liquid nitroglycerin from the cartridges, which would be dangerous.
For the storage of explosives at mines, &c., proper magazines must be provided, situated in a safe place, not too near other buildings, and preferably of light though fireproof construction. Masonry magazines, though safer from some points of view, may be the cause of greater damage in event of an explosion, because the brick or stones act as projectiles. Isolated and abandoned mine workings, if dry, are sometimes used as magazines.
For storing explosives at mines, etc., proper magazines need to be set up in a safe location, away from other buildings, and ideally built with lightweight yet fireproof materials. While masonry magazines may offer some safety advantages, they can also cause more damage in the event of an explosion because the bricks or stones can become projectiles. Dry, isolated, and abandoned mine workings are sometimes used as magazines.
![]() |
Fig 11. Electrical Fuze. |
Firing blasts by electricity has a wide application for both surface and underground work. An electrical fuze (fig. 11) consists of a pair of fine, insulated copper wires, several feet long and about 1⁄40 of an inch in diameter, with their bare ends inserted in a detonating cap. For firing, the fuze wires are joined to long leading wires, connected with some source of electric current. By joining the fuze wires in series or in groups, any number of holes may be fired simultaneously, according to the current available. A round of holes fired in this way, as for driving tunnels, sinking shafts, or in large surface excavations, produces better results, both in economy of explosive and effect of the blast, than when the holes are fired singly or in succession. Also, the miners are enabled to prepare for the blast with more care and deliberation, and then to reach a place of safety before the current is transmitted. Another advantage is that there is no danger of a hole “hanging fire,” which sometimes causes accidents in using ordinary fuzes.
Firing blasts using electricity has a wide range of applications for both surface and underground work. An electric fuse (fig. 11) consists of a pair of thin, insulated copper wires, several feet long and about 1⁄40 of an inch in diameter, with their exposed ends inserted into a detonating cap. To fire, the fuse wires are connected to long leading wires that link to a source of electric current. By connecting the fuse wires in series or in groups, any number of holes can be fired at the same time, depending on the amount of current available. A set of holes fired this way, for tasks such as tunneling, sinking shafts, or large surface excavations, yields better results in terms of explosive efficiency and blast effects than firing the holes one by one or in sequence. Additionally, miners can prepare for the blast with greater care and precision, and they can reach a safe location before the current is activated. Another benefit is that there is no risk of a hole "hanging fire," which can sometimes lead to accidents when using standard fuses.
Hanging fire may be due to a cut, broken or damaged powder fuze, which may smoulder for some time before communicating fire to the charge. “Miss-fires,” which also are of not infrequent occurrence with both ordinary and electric fuzes, are cases where explosion from any cause fails to take place. After waiting a sufficient length of time before approaching the charged hole, the miner carefully removes the tamping down to within a few inches of the explosives and inserts and fires another cartridge, the concussion usually detonating the entire charge. Sometimes another hole is drilled near the one which has missed. No attempt to remove the old charge should ever be made.
Hanging fire can happen due to a cut, broken, or damaged powder fuse, which might smolder for a while before igniting the charge. "Miss-fires," which are not uncommon with both regular and electric fuses, occur when an explosion fails to happen for any reason. After waiting a sufficient amount of time before approaching the charged hole, the miner carefully removes the tamping down to just a few inches above the explosives and inserts and fires another cartridge, the shock usually detonating the entire charge. Sometimes, another hole is drilled close to the one that missed. You should never attempt to remove the old charge.
High tension electricity, generated by a frictional machine, provided with a condenser, was formerly much used for blasting. The bare ends of the fuze wires in the detonating cap are placed say 1⁄8 in. apart, leaving a gap across which a spark is discharged, passing through a priming charge of some sensitive composition. The priming is not only combustible but also a conductor of electricity, such as an intimate mixture of potassium chlorate with copper sulphide and phosphide. By the combustion of the priming the fulminate mixture in the cap is detonated. As these fuzes are more apt to deteriorate when exposed to dampness than fuzes for low-tension current, and the generating machine is rather clumsy and fragile, low-tension current is more generally employed. It may be generated by a small, portable dynamo, operated by hand, or may be derived from a battery or from any convenient electric circuit. The ends of the fuze wires in the detonating cap are connected by a fine platinum filament (fig. 11), embedded in a guncotton priming on top of the fulminating mixture, and explosion results from the heat generated by the resistance opposed to the passage of the current through the filament. Blasting machines are made in several sizes, the smaller ones being capable of firing simultaneously from ten to twenty holes. The fuzes must obviously be of uniform electrical resistance, to ensure that all the connected charges will explode simultaneously. The premature explosion of any one of the fuzes would break the circuit.
High-tension electricity, produced by a friction machine with a condenser, was often used for blasting in the past. The bare ends of the fuse wires in the detonating cap are placed about 1⁄8 in. apart, leaving a gap where a spark jumps across, igniting a priming charge made from a sensitive composition. This priming is not just flammable but also conducts electricity, typically a mix of potassium chlorate with copper sulfide and phosphide. When the priming burns, it detonates the fulminate mixture in the cap. Since these fuses tend to deteriorate more quickly when exposed to moisture compared to those used for low-tension current, and because the generating machine is somewhat bulky and delicate, low-tension current is used more often. It can be produced by a small, portable hand-operated dynamo, or taken from a battery or any suitable electrical circuit. The fuse wires in the detonating cap are connected by a fine platinum filament (fig. 11), which is embedded in a guncotton priming above the fulminating mixture, and the explosion happens due to the heat from the resistance against the electric current flow through the filament. Blasting machines come in several sizes, with the smaller ones able to fire ten to twenty holes at the same time. The fuses must clearly have uniform electrical resistance to ensure that all the linked charges explode at the same time. If any fuse were to explode prematurely, it would break the circuit.
In the actual operations of blasting, definite rules for the proportioning of the charges are rarely observed, and although the blasts made by a skilful miner seldom fail to do their work, it is a common fault that too much, rather than too little, explosive is used. The high explosives are specially liable to be wasted, probably through lack of appreciation of their power as compared with that of black powder. Among the indications of excessive charges are the production of much finely broken rock or of crushed and splintered rock around the bottom of the hole, and excessive displacement or projection of the rock broken by the blast. In beginning any new piece of work, such waste may be avoided or reduced by making 48 trial shots with different charges and depths of hole, and noting the results; also by letting contracts under which the workmen pay for the explosive. In surface rock excavation the location and determination of the depth of the holes and the quantity of explosive used, are occasionally put in charge of one or more skilled men, who direct the work and are responsible for the results obtained.
In actual blasting operations, specific guidelines for charge proportions are rarely followed. Although skilled miners typically get the job done, a common mistake is using too much explosive instead of too little. High explosives are especially prone to wasted potential, likely due to a lack of understanding of their power compared to black powder. Signs of excessive charges include a lot of finely broken rock or crushed and splintered rock around the bottom of the hole, as well as too much displacement or projection of the rock that’s been blasted. To avoid or minimize this waste when starting any new project, trial shots with varying charges and hole depths should be made while noting the results; additionally, contracts can be set up where the workers cover the costs of the explosives. For surface rock excavation, the placement and depth of the holes and the amount of explosive used are sometimes managed by one or more experienced individuals who oversee the work and ensure the desired outcomes are achieved.
Blasting in surface excavations and quarries is sometimes done on an immense scale—called “mammoth blasting.” Shafts are sunk, or tunnels driven, in the mass of rock to be blasted, and, connected with them, a number of chambers are excavated to receive the charges of explosive. The preparation for such blasts may occupy months, and many tons of gunpowder or dynamite are at times exploded simultaneously, breaking or dislodging thousands, or even hundreds of thousands, of tons of rock. This method is adopted for getting stone cheaply, as for building macadamized roads, dams and breakwaters, obtaining limestone for blast furnace flux, and occasionally in excavating large railway cuttings. It is also applied in submarine blasting for the removal of reefs obstructing navigation, and sometimes for loosening extensive banks of partly cemented gold-bearing gravel, preparatory to washing by hydraulic mining.
Blasting in surface excavations and quarries is sometimes done on a massive scale—known as “mammoth blasting.” Shafts are drilled, or tunnels are made, in the rock to be blasted, and several chambers are dug to hold the explosive charges. Preparing for such blasts can take months, and many tons of gunpowder or dynamite may be detonated at once, breaking or dislodging thousands, or even hundreds of thousands, of tons of rock. This method is used to source stone cheaply, like for building paved roads, dams, and breakwaters, obtaining limestone for blast furnace flux, and occasionally for large railway excavations. It’s also used in underwater blasting to remove reefs blocking navigation and sometimes for loosening large deposits of semi-cemented gold-bearing gravel, in preparation for hydraulic mining.
Authorities.—For further information on drilling and blasting see:—Callon, Lectures on Mining (1876), vol. i. chs. v. and vi.; Foster, Text-book of Ore and Stone Mining, (1900), ch. iv.; Hughes, Text-book of Coal Mining (1901), ch. iii.; H.S. Drinker, Tunnelling, Explosive Compounds and Rock Drills (1878); M.C. Ihlseng, Manual of Mining (1905), pp. 596-696; Köhler, Der Bergbaukunde (1897), pp. 104-208; Daw, The Blasting of Rock (1898); Prelini, Earth and Rock Excavation (1905), chs. v., vi. and vii.; Gillette, The Excavation of Rock (1904); Guttmann, Blasting (1892); Spon’s Dictionary of Engineering, art. “Boring and Blasting”; Eissler, Modern High Explosives (1893), pts. ii. and iii.; Walke, Lectures on Explosives (1897), chs. xix.-xxii. Also: Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. (London), vol. lxxxv. p. 264; Trans. Inst. Min. Eng. (England), vols. xiv., xv. and xvi. (arts, by W. Maurice), vol. xxvi. pp. 322, 348, vol. xxiv. p. 526 and vol. xxv. p. 108; Trans. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng., vol. xxvii. p. 530; Trans. Amer. Inst. Min. Eng., vol. xviii. p. 370, vol. xxix p. 405 and vol. xxxiv. p. 871; South Wales Inst. Eng. (1888); Jour. Ass. Eng. Socs., vol. vii. p. 58; Jour. Chem. Met. and Mining Soc. of South Africa, August 1905; School of Mines Quarterly, N.Y., vol. ix. p. 308; Colliery Guardian, April 15, 1898, and February 6, 1903; Mines and Minerals, February 1905, p. 348, January 1906, p. 259, and April 1906, p. 393; Eng. and Mining Jour., April 19, 1902, p. 552; The Engineer, February 24, 1905; Elec. Rev., June 9, 1899; Eng. News, vol. xxxii. p. 249, and August 3, 1905; Gluckauf, September 28, 1901, and July 5, 1902; Österr. Zeitschr. f. Berg- u. Hüttenwesen, May 18, 25, 1901, April 18, 1903 and November, 18, 1905; Annales des mines, vol. xviii. pp. 217-248.
Authorities.—For more information on drilling and blasting, see:—Callon, Lectures on Mining (1876), vol. i. chs. v. and vi.; Foster, Text-book of Ore and Stone Mining, (1900), ch. iv.; Hughes, Text-book of Coal Mining (1901), ch. iii.; H.S. Drinker, Tunnelling, Explosive Compounds and Rock Drills (1878); M.C. Ihlseng, Manual of Mining (1905), pp. 596-696; Köhler, Der Bergbaukunde (1897), pp. 104-208; Daw, The Blasting of Rock (1898); Prelini, Earth and Rock Excavation (1905), chs. v., vi. and vii.; Gillette, The Excavation of Rock (1904); Guttmann, Blasting (1892); Spon’s Dictionary of Engineering, art. “Boring and Blasting”; Eissler, Modern High Explosives (1893), pts. ii. and iii.; Walke, Lectures on Explosives (1897), chs. xix.-xxii. Also: Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. (London), vol. lxxxv. p. 264; Trans. Inst. Min. Eng. (England), vols. xiv., xv. and xvi. (arts, by W. Maurice), vol. xxvi. pp. 322, 348, vol. xxiv. p. 526 and vol. xxv. p. 108; Trans. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng., vol. xxvii. p. 530; Trans. Amer. Inst. Min. Eng., vol. xviii. p. 370, vol. xxix p. 405 and vol. xxxiv. p. 871; South Wales Inst. Eng. (1888); Jour. Ass. Eng. Socs., vol. vii. p. 58; Jour. Chem. Met. and Mining Soc. of South Africa, August 1905; School of Mines Quarterly, N.Y., vol. ix. p. 308; Colliery Guardian, April 15, 1898, and February 6, 1903; Mines and Minerals, February 1905, p. 348, January 1906, p. 259, and April 1906, p. 393; Eng. and Mining Jour., April 19, 1902, p. 552; The Engineer, February 24, 1905; Elec. Rev., June 9, 1899; Eng. News, vol. xxxii. p. 249, and August 3, 1905; Gluckauf, September 28, 1901, and July 5, 1902; Österr. Zeitschr. f. Berg- u. Hüttenwesen, May 18, 25, 1901, April 18, 1903 and November 18, 1905; Annales des mines, vol. xviii. pp. 217-248.
BLAUBEUREN, a town of Germany, in the kingdom of Württemberg, 12 m. W. of Ulm, with which it is connected by railway. Pop. (1900) 3114. It is romantically situated in a wild and deep valley of the Swabian Alps at an altitude of 1600 ft. and is partly surrounded by ancient walls. Of the three churches (two Evangelical and one Roman Catholic) the most remarkable is the abbey church (Klosterkirche), a late Gothic building dating from 1465-1496, the choir of which contains beautiful 15th century carved choir-stalls and a fine high altar with a triptych (1496). The choir only is used for service (Protestant), the nave being used as a gymnasium. The town church (Stadtkirche) also has a fine altar with triptych. The Benedictine abbey, founded in 1095, was used after the Reformation as a school, and is now an Evangelical theological seminary. There are two hospitals in the town.
Blaubeuren, a town in Germany, located in the kingdom of Württemberg, 12 miles west of Ulm, which is connected by railway. Population (1900) was 3,114. It is beautifully situated in a wild and deep valley of the Swabian Alps at an elevation of 1,600 feet and is partly surrounded by ancient walls. Of the three churches (two Evangelical and one Roman Catholic), the most notable is the abbey church (Klosterkirche), a late Gothic structure that dates from 1465 to 1496, featuring stunning 15th-century carved choir stalls and a remarkable high altar with a triptych (1496). Only the choir is used for services (Protestant), while the nave is utilized as a gymnasium. The town church (Stadtkirche) also boasts a beautiful altar with a triptych. The Benedictine abbey, established in 1095, functioned as a school after the Reformation and is now an Evangelical theological seminary. There are two hospitals in the town.
BLAVATSKY, HELENA PETROVNA (1831-1891), Russian theosophist, was born at Ekaterinoslav, on the 31st of July (O.S.) 1831, the daughter of Colonel Peter Hahn, a member of a Mecklenburg family, settled in Russia. She married in her seventeenth year a man very much her senior, Nicephore Blavatsky, a Russian official in Caucasia, from whom she was separated after a few months; in later days, when seeking to invest herself with a halo of virginity, she described the marriage as a nominal one. During the next twenty years Mme Blavatsky appears to have travelled widely in Canada, Texas, Mexico and India, with two attempts on Tibet. In one of these she seems to have crossed the frontier alone in disguise, been lost in the desert, and, after many adventures, been conducted back by a party of horsemen. The years from 1848 to 1858 were alluded to subsequently as “the veiled period” of her life, and she spoke vaguely of a seven years’ sojourn in “Little and Great Tibet,” or preferably of a “Himalayan retreat.” In 1858 she revisited Russia, where she created a sensation as a spiritualistic medium. About 1870 she acquired prominence among the spiritualists of the United States, where she lived for six years, becoming a naturalized citizen. Her leisure was occupied with the study of occult and kabbalistic literature, to which she soon added that of the sacred writings of India, through the medium of translations. In 1875 she conceived the plan of combining the spiritualistic “control” with the Buddhistic legends about Tibetan sages. Henceforth she determined to exclude all control save that of two Tibetan adepts or “mahatmas.” The mahatmas exhibited their “astral bodies” to her, “precipitated” messages which reached her from the confines of Tibet in an instant of time, supplied her with sound doctrine, and incited her to perform tricks for the conversion of sceptics. At New York, on the 17th of November 1875, with the aid of Colonel Henry S. Olcott, she founded the “Theosophical Society” with the object of (1) forming a universal brotherhood of man, (2) studying and making known the ancient religions, philosophies and sciences, (3) investigating the laws of nature and developing the divine powers latent in man. The Brahmanic and Buddhistic literature supplied the society with its terminology, and its doctrines were a curious amalgam of Egyptian, kabbalistic, occultist, Indian and modern spiritualistic ideas and formulas. Mme Blavatsky’s principal books were Isis Unveiled (New York, 1877), The Secret Doctrine, the Synthesis of Science, Religion and Philosophy (1888), The Key to Theosophy (1891). The two first of these are a mosaic of unacknowledged quotations from such books as K.R.H. Mackenzie’s Royal Masonic Encyclopaedia, C.W. King’s Gnostics, Zeller’s Plato, the works on magic by Dunlop, E. Salverte, Joseph Ennemoser, and Des Mousseaux, and the mystical writings of Eliphas Levi (L.A. Constant). A Glossary of Theosophical Terms (1890-1892) was compiled for the benefit of her disciples. But the appearance of Home’s Lights and Shadows of Spiritualism (1877) had a prejudicial effect upon the propaganda, and Heliona P. Blavatsky (as she began to style herself) retired to India. Thence she contributed some clever papers, “From the Caves and Jungles of Hindostan” (published separately in English, London, 1892) to the Russky Vyestnik. Defeated in her object of obtaining employment in the Russian secret service, she resumed her efforts to gain converts to theosophy. For this purpose the exhibition of “physical phenomena” was found necessary. Her jugglery was cleverly conceived, but on three occasions was exposed in the most conclusive manner. Nevertheless, her cleverness, volubility, energy and will-power enabled her to maintain her ground, and when she died on the 8th of May 1891 (White Lotus Day), at the theosophical headquarters in the Avenue Road, London, she was the acknowledged head of a community numbering not far short of 100,000, with journalistic organs in London, Paris, New York and Madras.
BLAVATSKY, HELENA PETROVNA (1831-1891), a Russian theosophist, was born in Ekaterinoslav on July 31, 1831 (O.S.), to Colonel Peter Hahn, who was part of a family from Mecklenburg settled in Russia. At seventeen, she married Nicephore Blavatsky, an older Russian official in Caucasia, but they separated after a few months; later, when she wanted to present herself as a virgin, she referred to the marriage as a nominal one. For the next twenty years, Madame Blavatsky traveled extensively in Canada, Texas, Mexico, and India, with two attempts to enter Tibet. On one of these trips, she managed to cross the border alone while disguised, got lost in the desert, and after many adventures, was rescued by a group of horsemen. The years from 1848 to 1858 were later referred to as “the veiled period” of her life, during which she vaguely mentioned spending seven years in “Little and Great Tibet,” or as she preferred, a “Himalayan retreat.” In 1858, she returned to Russia, where she made a splash as a spiritual medium. Around 1870, she became prominent among the spiritualists in the United States, where she lived for six years and became a naturalized citizen. She spent her free time studying occult and Kabbalistic texts, and soon added the sacred writings of India through translations. In 1875, she came up with the idea of merging spiritualistic “control” with Buddhist legends about Tibetan sages. From that point on, she decided to only acknowledge two Tibetan adepts or “mahatmas” as her control. The mahatmas revealed their “astral bodies” to her, “precipitated” messages from Tibet in no time, provided her with sound teachings, and encouraged her to perform tricks to convert skeptics. On November 17, 1875, in New York, with Colonel Henry S. Olcott's help, she founded the “Theosophical Society” with the aim of (1) creating a universal brotherhood of mankind, (2) studying and sharing ancient religions, philosophies, and sciences, and (3) investigating the laws of nature and developing the divine potential within humans. Brahmanic and Buddhist literature provided the society with its terminology, and its doctrines mixed Egyptian, Kabbalistic, occult, Indian, and contemporary spiritualistic ideas and formulas. Madame Blavatsky's major works included Isis Unveiled (New York, 1877), The Secret Doctrine, the Synthesis of Science, Religion and Philosophy (1888), and The Key to Theosophy (1891). The first two are filled with uncredited quotes from works like K.R.H. Mackenzie’s Royal Masonic Encyclopaedia, C.W. King’s Gnostics, Zeller’s Plato, and various writings on magic by Dunlop, E. Salverte, Joseph Ennemoser, and Des Mousseaux, alongside the mystical works of Eliphas Levi (L.A. Constant). A Glossary of Theosophical Terms (1890-1892) was created for her followers' benefit. However, the impact of Home’s Lights and Shadows of Spiritualism (1877) negatively affected her promotion of theosophy, and Heliona P. Blavatsky (as she began to call herself) retreated to India. From there, she contributed insightful articles titled "From the Caves and Jungles of Hindostan" (published separately in English, London, 1892) to the Russky Vyestnik. After failing to secure a job in the Russian secret service, she resumed her efforts to attract followers to theosophy. To do this, demonstrating “physical phenomena” became necessary. Her tricks were cleverly devised but were exposed conclusively on three occasions. Nevertheless, her intelligence, eloquence, energy, and determination helped her maintain her position. When she passed away on May 8, 1891 (White Lotus Day), at the theosophical headquarters on Avenue Road, London, she was recognized as the leader of a community of nearly 100,000, with publications in London, Paris, New York, and Madras.
Much information respecting her will be found in V.S. Solovyov’s Modern Priestess of Isis, translated by Walter Leaf (1895), in Arthur Lillie’s Madame Blavatsky and Her Theosophy (1895), and in the report made to the Society for Psychical Research by the Cambridge graduate despatched to investigate her doings in India. See also the article Theosophy.
Much information about her can be found in V.S. Solovyov’s Modern Priestess of Isis, translated by Walter Leaf (1895), in Arthur Lillie’s Madame Blavatsky and Her Theosophy (1895), and in the report made to the Society for Psychical Research by the Cambridge graduate sent to investigate her activities in India. See also the article Theosophy.
BLAYDES, FREDERICK HENRY MARVELL (1818-1908), English classical scholar, was born at Hampton Court Green, on the 29th of September 1818, being a collateral descendant of Andrew Marvell, the satirist and friend of Milton. He was educated at St Peter’s school, York, and Christ Church, Oxford. He was Hertford scholar in 1838, took a second class in literae humaniores in 1840, and was subsequently elected to a studentship at Christ Church. In 1842 he took orders, and from 1843 to 1886 was vicar of Harringworth in Northamptonshire. During a long life he devoted himself almost entirely to the study of the Greek dramatists. His editions and philological papers are remarkable for bold conjectural emendations of corrupt (and other) passages. His distinction was recognized by his being made an honorary LL.D. of Dublin, Ph.D. of the university of Buda Pest and a fellow of the royal society of letters at Athens. He died at Southsea on the 7th of September 1908.
BLAYDES, FREDERICK HENRY MARVELL (1818-1908), English classical scholar, was born at Hampton Court Green on September 29, 1818, and was a distant relative of Andrew Marvell, the satirist and friend of Milton. He studied at St Peter’s School in York and Christ Church, Oxford. He was a Hertford scholar in 1838, earned a second class in literae humaniores in 1840, and was later elected to a studentship at Christ Church. In 1842, he became ordained, and from 1843 to 1886, he served as vicar of Harringworth in Northamptonshire. Throughout his long life, he dedicated himself almost entirely to the study of Greek dramatists. His editions and philological papers are known for their bold and conjectural corrections of corrupt (and other) passages. His contributions were acknowledged when he was granted an honorary LL.D. by Dublin, a Ph.D. from the University of Budapest, and made a fellow of the Royal Society of Letters in Athens. He passed away in Southsea on September 7, 1908.
His works include:—Aristophanes: Comedies and Fragments, with critical notes and commentary (1880-1893); Clouds, Knights, Frogs, Wasps (1873-1878); Opera Omnia, with critical notes (1886); 49 Sophocles; Oedipus Coloneus, Oedipus Tyrannus and Antigone (in the Bibliotheca Classica, 1859); Philoctetes (1870), Trachiniae (1871), Electra (1873), Ajax (1875), Antigone (1005); Aeschylus: Agamemnon (1898), Choephori (1899), Eumenides (1900), Adversaria Critica in Comicorum Graecorum Fragmenta (1890); in Tragicorum Graec. Frag. (1894), in Aeschylum (1895), in Varios Poetas Graecos et Latinos (1898), in Aristophanem (1899), in Sophoclem (1899), in Euripidem (1901), in Herodotum (1901); Analecta Comica Graeca (1905); Analecta Tragica Graeca (1906).
His works include:—Aristophanes: Comedies and Fragments, with critical notes and commentary (1880-1893); Clouds, Knights, Frogs, Wasps (1873-1878); Opera Omnia, with critical notes (1886); 49 Sophocles; Oedipus Coloneus, Oedipus Tyrannus and Antigone (in the Bibliotheca Classica, 1859); Philoctetes (1870), Trachiniae (1871), Electra (1873), Ajax (1875), Antigone (1005); Aeschylus: Agamemnon (1898), Choephori (1899), Eumenides (1900), Adversaria Critica in Comicorum Graecorum Fragmenta (1890); in Tragicorum Graec. (1894), in Aeschylum (1895), in Varios Poetas Graecos et Latinos (1898), in Aristophanem (1899), in Sophoclem (1899), in Euripidem (1901), in Herodotum (1901); Analecta Comica Graeca (1905); Analecta Tragica Graeca (1906).
BLAYDON, an urban district in the Chester-le-Street parliamentary division of Durham, England, on the Tyne, 4 m. W. of Newcastle by a branch of the North-Eastern railway. Pop. (1881) 10,687; (1901) 19,617. The chief industries are coal-mining, iron-founding, pipe, fire-brick, chemical manure and bottle manufactures. In the vicinity is the beautiful old mansion of Stella, and below it Stellaheugh, to which the victorious Scottish army crossed from Newburn on the Northumberland bank in 1640, after which they occupied Newcastle.
BLAYDON, is an urban district in the Chester-le-Street parliamentary division of Durham, England, located on the Tyne, 4 miles west of Newcastle by a branch of the North-Eastern railway. Population: (1881) 10,687; (1901) 19,617. The main industries include coal mining, iron founding, and the production of pipes, fire bricks, chemical fertilizers, and bottles. Nearby is the beautiful old mansion of Stella, and below it is Stellaheugh, where the victorious Scottish army crossed from Newburn on the Northumberland side in 1640, after which they took control of Newcastle.
BLAYE-ET-STE LUCE, a town of south-western France, capital of an arrondissement in the department of Gironde, on the right bank of the Gironde (here over 2 m. wide), 35 m. N. of Bordeaux by rail. Pop. (1906) of the town, 3423; of the commune, 4890. The town has a citadel built by Vauban on a rock beside the river, and embracing in its enceinte ruins of an old Gothic château. The latter contains the tomb of Caribert, king of Toulouse, and son of Clotaire II. Blaye is also defended by the Fort Pâté on an island in the river and the Fort Médoc on its left bank, both of the 17th century. The town is the seat of a sub-prefect, and has tribunals of first instance and of commerce and a communal college. It has a small river-port, and carries on trade in wine, brandy, grain, fruit and timber. The industries include the building of small vessels, distilling, flour-milling, and the manufacture of oil and candles. Fine red wine is produced in the district.
BLAYE-ET-STE LUCE, is a town in southwestern France, the capital of an arrondissement in the Gironde department, located on the right bank of the Gironde River (which is over 2 miles wide here), 35 miles north of Bordeaux by train. As of 1906, the town had a population of 3,423, and the commune had a total of 4,890 residents. The town features a citadel built by Vauban on a rock by the river, which includes the ruins of an old Gothic château. This château houses the tomb of Caribert, king of Toulouse, and son of Clotaire II. Blaye is also protected by Fort Pâté on an island in the river and Fort Médoc on the left bank, both dating back to the 17th century. The town serves as the seat of a sub-prefect and has courts of first instance and commerce, as well as a communal college. It has a small river port and engages in trade with wine, brandy, grain, fruit, and timber. Industry in the area includes building small vessels, distilling, flour milling, and manufacturing oil and candles. The district is known for producing fine red wine.
In ancient times Blaye (Blavia) was a port of the Santones. Tradition states that the hero Roland was buried in its basilica, which was on the site of the citadel. It was early an important stronghold which played an important part in the wars against the English and the Religious Wars. The duchess of Berry was imprisoned in its fortress in 1832-1833.
In ancient times, Blaye (Blavia) was a port for the Santones. Legend has it that the hero Roland was buried in its basilica, which stood on the site of the citadel. It was an important stronghold early on and played a significant role in the wars against the English and the Religious Wars. The Duchess of Berry was imprisoned in its fortress from 1832 to 1833.
BLAZE (A.-S. blaese, a torch), a fire or bright flame; more nearly akin to the Ger. blass, pale or shining white, is the use of the word for the white mark on the face of a horse or cow, and the American use for a mark made on a tree by cutting off a piece of the bark. The word “to blaze,” in the sense of to noise abroad, comes from the A.-S. blaesan, to blow, cf. the Ger. blasen; in sense, if not in origin, it is confused with “blazon” in heraldry.
BLAZE (Old English blaese, a torch), refers to a fire or bright flame; it is more closely related to the German blass, meaning pale or shining white. The term is also used for the white mark on a horse or cow's face, and in American English, it refers to a mark made on a tree by cutting off a piece of the bark. The verb "to blaze," meaning to spread news widely, comes from Old English blaesan, which means to blow, similar to the German blasen; in meaning, if not in origin, it is confused with “blazon” in heraldry.
BLAZON, a heraldic shield, a coat of arms properly “described” according to the rules of heraldry, hence a proper heraldic description of such a coat. The O. Fr. blason seems originally to have meant simply a shield as a means of defence and not a shield-shaped surface for the display of armorial bearings, but this is difficult to reconcile with the generally accepted derivation from the Ger. blasen, to blow, proclaim, English “blaze,” to noise abroad, to declare. In the 16th century the heraldic term, and “blaze” and “blazon” in the sense of proclaim, had much influence on each other.
BLAZON, refers to a heraldic shield, a coat of arms accurately described according to the rules of heraldry, thus providing a proper heraldic description of that coat. The Old French blason originally seemed to mean just a shield used for defense, not one designed for displaying armorial symbols, but this interpretation is hard to align with the widely accepted origin from the German blasen, meaning to blow or proclaim, similar to the English “blaze,” which means to announce or declare. In the 16th century, the heraldic term, along with “blaze” and “blazon” in the context of proclaiming, heavily influenced one another.
BLEACHING, the process of whitening or depriving objects of colour, an operation incessantly in activity in nature by the influence of light, air and moisture. The art of bleaching, of which we have here to treat, consists in inducing the rapid operation of whitening agencies, and as an industry it is mostly directed to cotton, linen, silk, wool and other textile fibres, but it is also applied to the whitening of paper-pulp, bees’-wax and some oils and other substances. The term bleaching is derived from the A.-S. blaecan, to bleach, or to fade, from which also comes the cognate German word bleichen, to whiten or render pale. Bleachers, down to the end of the 18th century, were known in England as “whitsters,” a name obviously derived from the nature of their calling.
BLEACHING, is the process of whitening or removing color from objects, a natural process that constantly occurs due to the effects of light, air, and moisture. The art of bleaching, which we will discuss here, involves speeding up the whitening process, and as an industry, it primarily focuses on cotton, linen, silk, wool, and other textile fibers. However, it is also used to whiten paper pulp, beeswax, certain oils, and other materials. The term bleaching comes from the Old English blaecan, which means to bleach or fade, and is related to the German word bleichen, meaning to whiten or pale. Up until the end of the 18th century, bleachers in England were known as "whitsters," a name that clearly reflects their profession.
The operation of bleaching must from its very nature be of the same antiquity as the work of washing textures of linen, cotton or other vegetable fibres. Clothing repeatedly washed, and exposed in the open air to dry, gradually assumes a whiter and whiter hue, and our ancestors cannot have failed to notice and take advantage of this fact. Scarcely anything is known with certainty of the art of bleaching as practised by the nations of antiquity. Egypt in early ages was the great centre of textile manufactures, and her white and coloured linens were in high repute among contemporary nations. As a uniformly well-bleached basis is necessary for the production of a satisfactory dye on cloth, it may be assumed that the Egyptians were fairly proficient in bleaching, and that still more so were the Phoenicians with their brilliant and famous purple dyes. We learn, from Pliny, that different plants, and likewise the ashes of plants, which no doubt contained alkali, were employed as detergents. He mentions particularly the Struthium as much used for bleaching in Greece, a plant which has been identified by some with Gypsophila Struthium. But as it does not appear from John Sibthorp’s Flora Graeca, edited by Sir James Smith, that this species is a native of Greece, Dr Sibthorp’s conjecture that the Struthium of the ancients was the Saponaria officinalis, a plant common in Greece, is certainly more probable.
The process of bleaching has likely been around as long as washing linen, cotton, and other plant-based fabrics. Clothes that are washed multiple times and left to dry outdoors gradually become whiter, and our ancestors must have noticed and used this fact. Not much is known for sure about the bleaching techniques used by ancient civilizations. Egypt was a major hub for textile production in early times, and their white and colored linens were highly regarded among other nations. Since a well-bleached fabric is essential for achieving good dye results, it’s reasonable to believe that the Egyptians were skilled at bleaching, and even more so were the Phoenicians, known for their vibrant purple dyes. Pliny tells us that various plants, as well as plant ashes likely containing alkali, were used as cleaning agents. He specifically mentions the Struthium, which was commonly used for bleaching in Greece, a plant some have identified as Gypsophila Struthium. However, since John Sibthorp’s Flora Graeca, edited by Sir James Smith, doesn't show this species as native to Greece, Dr. Sibthorp’s theory that the ancient Struthium was the more common Greek plant Saponaria officinalis is certainly more likely.
In modern times, down to the middle of the 18th century, the Dutch possessed almost a monopoly of the bleaching trade although we find mention of bleach-works at Southwark near London as early as the middle of the 17th century. It was customary to send all the brown linen, then largely manufactured in Scotland, to Holland to be bleached. It was sent away in the month of March, and not returned till the end of October, being thus out of the hands of the merchant more than half a year.
In modern times, up until the middle of the 18th century, the Dutch had almost a monopoly on the bleaching trade, although there are records of bleach-works in Southwark near London dating back to the mid-17th century. It was common practice to send all the brown linen, which was mostly produced in Scotland, to Holland for bleaching. The linen was sent out in March and wasn't returned until the end of October, meaning it was out of the merchant's hands for more than half a year.
The Dutch mode of bleaching, which was mostly conducted in the neighbourhood of Haarlem, was to steep the linen first in a waste lye, and then for about a week in a potash lye poured over it boiling hot. The cloth being taken out of this lye and washed, was next put into wooden vessels containing buttermilk, in which it lay under a pressure for five or six days. After this it was spread upon the grass, and kept wet for several months, exposed to the sunshine of summer.
The Dutch method of bleaching, mainly done near Haarlem, involved soaking the linen first in a waste lye, and then for about a week in boiling hot potash lye. After being removed from the lye and washed, the cloth was placed in wooden containers filled with buttermilk, where it stayed under pressure for five or six days. Following this, it was laid out on the grass and kept damp for several months, soaking up the summer sun.
In 1728 James Adair from Belfast proposed to the Scottish Board of Manufactures to establish a bleachfield in Galloway; this proposal the board approved of, and in the same year resolved to devote £2000 as premiums for the establishment of bleachfields throughout the country. In 1732 a method of bleaching with kelp, introduced by R. Holden, also from Ireland, was submitted to the board; and with their assistance Holden established a bleachfield for prosecuting his process at Pitkerro, near Dundee.
In 1728, James Adair from Belfast suggested to the Scottish Board of Manufactures that they set up a bleachfield in Galloway. The board agreed, and that same year decided to allocate £2000 as incentives for establishing bleachfields across the country. In 1732, a bleaching method using kelp, introduced by R. Holden, who was also from Ireland, was presented to the board. With their support, Holden set up a bleachfield to carry out his process at Pitkerro, near Dundee.
The bleaching process, as at that time performed, was very tedious, occupying a complete summer. It consisted in steeping the cloth in alkaline lyes for several days, washing it clean, and spreading it upon the grass for some weeks. The steeping in alkaline lyes, called bucking, and the bleaching on the grass, called crofting, were repeated alternately for five or six times. The cloth was then steeped for some days in sour milk, washed clean and crofted. These processes were repeated, diminishing every time the strength of the alkaline lye, till the linen had acquired the requisite whiteness.
The bleaching process back then was very time-consuming, taking the entire summer. It involved soaking the cloth in alkaline lye for several days, washing it, and then laying it out on the grass for several weeks. The soaking in alkaline lye, known as bucking, and the bleaching on the grass, referred to as crofting, were done alternately about five or six times. After that, the cloth was soaked in sour milk for a few days, washed again, and crofted. These steps were repeated, with the strength of the alkaline lye gradually decreasing each time, until the linen reached the desired level of whiteness.
For the first improvement in this tedious process, which was faithfully copied from the Dutch bleachfields, manufacturers were indebted to Dr Francis Home of Edinburgh, to whom the Board of Trustees paid £100 for his experiments in bleaching. He proposed to substitute water acidulated with sulphuric acid for the sour milk previously employed, a suggestion made in consequence of the new mode of preparing sulphuric acid, contrived some time before by Dr John Roebuck, which reduced the price of that acid to less than one-third of what it had formerly been. When this change was first adopted by the bleachers, there was the same outcry against its corrosive effects as arose when chlorine was substituted for crofting. A great advantage was found to result from the use of sulphuric acid, which was that a souring with sulphuric acid required at the longest only twenty-four hours, and often not more than twelve; whereas, when sour milk was employed, six weeks, or even two 50 months, were requisite, according to the state of the weather. In consequence of this improvement, the process of bleaching was shortened from eight months to four, which enabled the merchant to dispose of his goods so much the sooner, and consequently to trade with less capital.
For the first improvement in this tedious process, which was faithfully copied from the Dutch bleachfields, manufacturers were thankful to Dr. Francis Home of Edinburgh, to whom the Board of Trustees paid £100 for his experiments in bleaching. He suggested replacing the sour milk previously used with water mixed with sulfuric acid, a proposal made due to the new method of preparing sulfuric acid developed earlier by Dr. John Roebuck, which lowered the cost of that acid to less than one-third of its previous price. When this change was first adopted by the bleachers, there was a similar uproar about its corrosive effects as there had been when chlorine replaced crofting. A significant advantage of using sulfuric acid was that souring only took a maximum of twenty-four hours, and often just twelve; while using sour milk required six weeks, or even two months, depending on the weather. As a result of this improvement, the bleaching process was shortened from eight months to four, allowing the merchant to sell his goods much sooner and therefore to operate with less capital.
No further modification of consequence was introduced in the art till the year 1787, when a most important change was initiated by the use of chlorine (q.v.), an element which had been discovered by C.W. Scheele in Sweden about thirteen years before. The discovery that this gas possesses the property of destroying vegetable colours, led Berthollet to suspect that it might be introduced with advantage into the art of bleaching, and that it would enable practical bleachers greatly to shorten their processes. In a paper on chlorine or oxygenated muriatic acid, read before the Academy of Sciences at Paris in April 1785, and published in the Journal de Physique for May of the same year (vol. xxvi. p. 325), he mentions that he had tried the effect of the gas in bleaching cloth, and found that it answered perfectly. This idea is still further developed in a paper on the same substance, published in the Journal de Physique for 1786. In 1786 he exhibited the experiment to James Watt, who, immediately upon his return to England, commenced a practical examination of the subject, and was accordingly the person who first introduced the new method of bleaching into Great Britain. We find from Watt’s own testimony that chlorine was practically employed in the bleachfield of his father-in-law, Mr Macgregor, in the neighbourhood of Glasgow, in March 1787. Shortly thereafter the method was introduced at Aberdeen by Messrs Gordon, Barron & Co., on information received from De Saussure through Professor Patrick Copland of Aberdeen. Thomas Henry of Manchester was the first to bleach with chlorine in the Lancashire district, and to his independent investigations several of the early improvements in the application of the material were due.
No significant changes were made to the art until 1787, when a crucial shift occurred with the use of chlorine (q.v.), an element discovered by C.W. Scheele in Sweden about thirteen years earlier. The finding that this gas could eliminate vegetable colors led Berthollet to think it could be beneficial for bleaching, allowing practical bleachers to significantly speed up their processes. In a paper on chlorine or oxygenated muriatic acid, presented to the Academy of Sciences in Paris in April 1785 and published in the Journal de Physique in May of that same year (vol. xxvi. p. 325), he noted that he had tested the gas on bleaching cloth and found it worked perfectly. This concept was further explored in a paper on the same substance published in the Journal de Physique in 1786. In 1786, he demonstrated the experiment to James Watt, who, upon returning to England, began a practical study of the subject and was therefore the first to introduce the new bleaching method to Great Britain. According to Watt's own account, chlorine was used in the bleachfield of his father-in-law, Mr. Macgregor, near Glasgow, in March 1787. Soon after, the method was adopted in Aberdeen by Messrs. Gordon, Barron & Co., based on information from De Saussure through Professor Patrick Copland of Aberdeen. Thomas Henry of Manchester was the first to use chlorine for bleaching in the Lancashire area, and his independent research contributed to several early improvements in the use of the material.
In these early experiments, the bleacher had to make his own chlorine and the goods were bleached either by exposing them in chambers to the action of the gas or by steeping them in its aqueous solution. If we consider the inconveniences which must have arisen in working with such a pungent substance as free chlorine, with its detrimental effect on the health of the work-people, it will be readily understood that the process did not at first meet with any great amount of success. The first important improvement was the introduction in 1792 of eau de Javel, which was prepared at the Javel works near Paris by absorbing chlorine in a solution of potash (1 part) in water (8 parts) until effervescence began. The greatest impetus to the bleaching industry was, however, given by the introduction in 1799 of chloride of lime, or bleaching-powder, by Charles Tennant of Glasgow, whereby the bleacher was supplied with a reagent in solid form which contained up to one-third of its weight of available chlorine. Latterly frequent attempts have been made to replace bleaching-powder by hypochlorite of soda, which is prepared by the bleacher as required, by the electrolytic decomposition of a solution of common salt in specially constructed cells, but up to the present this mode of procedure has met with only a limited success (see Alkali Manufacture).
In these early experiments, the bleacher had to create his own chlorine, and the goods were bleached either by exposing them in chambers to the gas or by soaking them in its aqueous solution. Considering the challenges associated with working with such a strong substance like free chlorine, which had harmful effects on the health of the workers, it's easy to see that the process didn't initially achieve much success. The first significant improvement came in 1792 with the introduction of eau de Javel, which was made at the Javel works near Paris by absorbing chlorine in a solution of potash (1 part) in water (8 parts) until bubbling began. However, a major boost to the bleaching industry was provided in 1799 by Charles Tennant of Glasgow with the introduction of chloride of lime, or bleaching powder, which gave bleachers a solid reagent containing up to one-third of its weight in available chlorine. More recently, there have been many attempts to replace bleaching powder with hypochlorite of soda, produced by the bleacher as needed through the electrolytic decomposition of a common salt solution in specially designed cells, but so far, this method has had only limited success (see Alkali Manufacture).
Bleaching of Cotton.
Cotton Bleaching.
Cotton is bleached in the raw state, as yarn and in the piece. In the raw state, and as yarn, the only impurities present are those which are naturally contained in the fibres and which include cotton wax, fatty acids, pectic substances, colouring matters, albuminoids and mineral matter, amounting in all to some 5% of the weight of the material. Both in the raw state and in the manufactured condition cotton also contains small black particles which adhere firmly to the material and are technically known as “motes.” These consist of fragments of the cotton seed husk, which cannot be completely removed by mechanical means. The bleaching of cotton pieces is more complicated, since the bleacher is called upon to remove the sizing materials with which the manufacturer strengthens the warp before weaving (see below).
Cotton is bleached in its raw state, as yarn, and in finished pieces. In its raw state and as yarn, the only impurities are those naturally found in the fibers, including cotton wax, fatty acids, pectic substances, coloring agents, albuminoids, and mineral matter, which together make up about 5% of the material's weight. Both in its raw form and when processed, cotton also has small black particles that stick to the material, referred to as “motes.” These are bits of the cotton seed husk that cannot be fully removed using mechanical methods. Bleaching cotton pieces is more complex because the bleacher has to eliminate the sizing materials that manufacturers use to strengthen the warp before weaving (see below).
In principle, the bleaching of cotton is a comparatively simple process in which three main operations are involved, viz. (1) boiling with an alkali; (2) bleaching the organic colouring matters by means of a hypochlorite or some other oxidizing agent; (3) souring, i.e. treating with weak hydrochloric or sulphuric acid. For loose cotton and yarn these three operations are sufficient, but for piece goods a larger number of operations is usually necessary in order to obtain a satisfactory result.
In general, bleaching cotton is a pretty straightforward process that involves three main steps: (1) boiling with an alkali; (2) using a hypochlorite or another oxidizing agent to bleach the organic colors; and (3) souring, which means treating it with weak hydrochloric or sulfuric acid. For loose cotton and yarn, these three steps are enough, but for finished fabric, more steps are typically needed to achieve a good result.
Loose Cotton.—The bleaching of loose or raw cotton previous to spinning is only carried out to a very limited extent, and consists essentially in first steeping the material in a warm solution of soda for some hours, after which it is washed and treated with a solution of bleaching powder or sodium hypochlorite. It is then again washed, soured with weak sulphuric or hydrochloric acid, and ultimately washed free from acid. Careful treatment is necessary in order to avoid any undue matting of the fibres, while any drastic treatment, such as heating with caustic soda and soap, as used for other cotton materials, cannot be employed, since the natural wax would thereby be removed, and this would detract from the spinning qualities of the fibre. In case the cotton is not intended to be spun, but is to serve for cotton wool or for the manufacture of gun cotton, more drastic treatment can be employed, and is, in fact, desirable. Thus, cotton waste is first extracted with petroleum spirit or some other suitable solvent, in order to remove any mineral oil or grease which may be present. It is then boiled with dilute caustic soda and resin soap, washed, bleached white with bleaching-powder, washed, soured and finally washed free from acid. In these operations, a certain amount of matting is unavoidable, and it is consequently necessary to open out the material after drying, in scutchers.
Loose Cotton.—Bleaching loose or raw cotton before spinning is done only to a small extent. It mainly involves soaking the material in a warm soda solution for several hours, followed by washing and treating it with a bleaching powder or sodium hypochlorite solution. Then, it is washed again, treated with weak sulfuric or hydrochloric acid, and finally washed to remove any acid. Careful handling is crucial to prevent excessive matting of the fibers, and harsh methods, like heating with caustic soda and soap used for other cotton types, should be avoided, as they would strip the natural wax, reducing the fabric's spinning quality. If the cotton is not meant for spinning but for cotton wool or gun cotton production, harsher treatments are acceptable and even preferred. For instance, cotton waste is first extracted with petroleum spirit or another suitable solvent to eliminate any mineral oil or grease. It is then boiled with diluted caustic soda and resin soap, washed, bleached white with bleaching powder, washed again, treated with acid, and finally washed to remove the acid. Some matting is inevitable during these processes, so the material needs to be loosened after drying using scutchers.
Cotton Yarn.—Cotton yarn is bleached in the form of cops, hanks or warps. In principle the processes employed are the same in each case, but the machinery necessarily differs. Most yarn is bleached in the hank, and it will suffice to give an account of this process only. The sequence of operations is the same as in the bleaching of cotton waste, and these can be conducted for small lots in an ordinary rectangular wooden vat as used in dyeing, in which the yarn is suspended in the liquor from poles which rest with their ends on the two longer sides of the vat. For bleaching yarn in bulk, however, this mode of procedure would involve so much manual labour that the process would become too expensive. It is, therefore, mainly with the object of economy that machinery has been introduced, by means of which large quantities can be dealt with at a time.
Cotton Yarn.—Cotton yarn is bleached in the form of cops, hanks, or warps. Basically, the processes used are the same for each type, but the machinery varies. Most yarn is bleached in the hank, so we'll only explain that process. The steps are the same as in bleaching cotton waste, and these can be done for small batches in a regular rectangular wooden vat like the ones used for dyeing, where the yarn is hung in the liquid using poles that rest on the two longer sides of the vat. However, using this method for bleaching yarn in bulk would require so much manual work that it would be too costly. Therefore, machinery has been introduced mainly for the sake of efficiency, allowing larger quantities to be processed at once.
The first operation, viz. that of boiling in alkali, is carried out in a “kier,” a large, egg-ended, upright cylindrical vessel, constructed of boiler-plate and capable of treating from one to three tons of yarn at a time. In construction, the kiers used for yarn bleaching are similar in construction to those used for pieces (see below). The yarn to be bleached is evenly packed in the kier, and is then boiled by means of steam with the alkaline lye (3-4% of soda ash or 2% caustic soda on the weight of the cotton being usually employed) for periods varying from six to twelve hours. It is essential that a thorough circulation of the liquor should be maintained during the boiling, and this is effected either by means of a steam injector, or in other ways. As a rule low pressure kiers (working up to 10 lb pressure) are employed for yarn bleaching, though some bleachers prefer to use high pressure kiers for the purpose.
The first step, which is boiling in alkali, is done in a "kier," a large, egg-shaped, upright cylindrical tank made of boiler plate, capable of processing one to three tons of yarn at a time. The kiers used for yarn bleaching are built similarly to those used for fabric (see below). The yarn to be bleached is packed evenly in the kier and boiled with steam and alkaline lye (usually 3-4% soda ash or 2% caustic soda based on the weight of the cotton) for six to twelve hours. It's crucial to maintain good circulation of the liquid during boiling, which is done using a steam injector or other methods. Generally, low pressure kiers (operating up to 10 lb pressure) are used for yarn bleaching, although some bleachers prefer high pressure kiers for this purpose.
When the boiling has continued for the requisite time (6-8 hours), the steam is shut off, and the kier liquor blown off, when the yarn is washed in the kier by filling the latter with water and then running off, this operation being repeated two or three times. The hanks are now transferred to a stone cistern provided with a false bottom, from beneath which a pipe connects the cistern with a well situated below the floor line. The well contains a solution of bleaching-powder, usually of 2° Tw. strength, and this is drawn up by means of a centrifugal brass pump and showered over the top of the goods through a perforated wooden tray, passing then by gravitation through the goods back into the well. The circulation is maintained for one and a half to two hours, when the yarn will be found to be white. The bleaching-powder solution is now allowed to drain off, and water is circulated through the cistern to wash out what bleaching powder remains in the goods. The souring is next carried out either in the same or in a separate cistern by circulating hydrochloric or sulphuric acid of 2° Tw. for about half an hour. This is also allowed to drain, and the yarn is thoroughly washed to remove all acid, when it is taken out and wrung or hydroextracted. At this stage the yarn may be dyed in light or bright shades without further treatment, but if it is to be sold as white yarn, it is blued. The blueing may either be effected by dyeing or tinting with a colouring matter like Victoria blue 4R or acid violet, or by treatment in wash stocks with a suspension of ultramarine in weak soap until the colour is uniformly distributed throughout the material. The yarn is now straightened out and dried.
When the boiling has gone on for the required time (6-8 hours), the steam is turned off, and the kier liquor is released. Then, the yarn is washed in the kier by filling it with water and draining it out, repeating this process two or three times. The hanks are then moved to a stone cistern with a false bottom, which has a pipe connecting it to a well located below the floor line. The well contains a bleaching-powder solution, usually at a strength of 2° Tw., which is pumped up with a centrifugal brass pump and showered over the goods through a perforated wooden tray, then it flows back into the well by gravity. This circulation continues for one and a half to two hours, at which point the yarn will be white. The bleaching-powder solution is then allowed to drain off, and water is circulated through the cistern to remove any remaining bleaching powder from the goods. The souring process follows, either in the same cistern or a different one, by circulating hydrochloric or sulfuric acid at 2° Tw. for about half an hour. This too is drained, and the yarn is thoroughly washed to eliminate all acid, after which it is removed and wrung out or hydroextracted. At this point, the yarn can be dyed in light or bright shades without further treatment, but if it’s meant to be sold as white yarn, it is blued. The blueing can be done by dyeing or tinting it with a coloring agent like Victoria blue 4R or acid violet, or by treating it in wash stocks with a suspension of ultramarine in weak soap until the color is evenly distributed throughout the material. The yarn is then straightened out and dried.
The bleaching of cotton yarn is a very straightforward process, and it is very seldom that either complications or faults arise, providing that reasonable care and supervision are exercised.
The bleaching of cotton yarn is a simple process, and complications or mistakes rarely occur, as long as reasonable care and supervision are maintained.
The raison d’être of the various operations is comparatively simple. 51 The effect of boiling with alkali is to remove the pectic acid, the fatty acids, part of the cotton wax and the bulk of the colouring matter, while the albuminoids are destroyed and the motes swelled up. If soap be used along with the alkali, the whole of the wax is removed by emulsification. In the operation of bleaching proper, the calcium hypochlorite of the chloride of lime through coming into contact with the carbonic acid of the atmosphere suffers decomposition according to the equation, Ca(OCl)2 + CO2 + H2O → CaCO3 + 2HOCl, and the hypochlorous acid thus liberated destroys the colouring matter still remaining from the first operation, by oxidation. At the same time the motes which were swelled up by the alkali are broken up into small fragments and are thus removed. In the operation of souring, the lime which has been deposited on the fibres during the treatment with bleaching powder is dissolved, while at the same time any other metallic oxides (iron, copper, &c.) are removed.
The raison d’être of the various operations is fairly straightforward. 51 Boiling with alkali helps to eliminate pectic acid, fatty acids, some of the cotton wax, and most of the coloring agents, while destroying the albuminoids and expanding the particles. If soap is added alongside the alkali, it emulsifies and removes all the wax. In the main bleaching process, calcium hypochlorite from the bleaching powder reacts with carbonic acid in the air and breaks down according to this equation: Ca(OCl)2 + CO2 + H2O → CaCO3 + 2HOCl. The hypochlorous acid released in this reaction then oxidizes the remaining coloring agents from the first step. Meanwhile, the particles that were expanded by the alkali break into smaller pieces, making them easier to remove. During the souring step, the lime that settled on the fibers during bleaching is dissolved, along with any other metallic oxides (like iron and copper).
Cotton Pieces.—By far the largest bulk of cotton is bleached in the piece, as it can be more conveniently and more economically dealt with in this form than in any other. Though similar in principle to yarn bleaching, the process of piece bleaching is somewhat more complex because the pieces contain in addition to the natural impurities of the cotton a considerable amount of foreign matter in the form of size which has been incorporated with the warp before weaving, with the object of strengthening it. This size consists essentially of starch (farina), with additions of tallow, zinc chloride, and occasionally other substances such as paraffin wax, magnesium chloride, soap, &c., all of which must be removed if a perfect bleach is to result. Besides, mineral oil stains from the machinery of the weaving-shed are of common occurrence in piece goods.
Cotton Pieces.—The vast majority of cotton is bleached in the piece because it's easier and more cost-effective to handle in this format than in any other. While similar to yarn bleaching, the process of piece bleaching is a bit more intricate since the pieces not only have the natural impurities of cotton but also a significant amount of foreign matter in the form of size that has been added to the warp before weaving to strengthen it. This size is mainly starch (farina), along with additives like tallow, zinc chloride, and sometimes other substances such as paraffin wax, magnesium chloride, and soap, all of which need to be removed to achieve a perfect bleach. Additionally, mineral oil stains from the weaving machinery are often found in piece goods.
Cotton pieces are bleached either for whites, for prints or for dyed goods. The processes employed for these different classes vary but slightly and only in detail. The most drastic bleach is that required for goods which are subsequently to be printed. For dyed goods, the main object is not so much to obtain a perfect white as to remove any impurities which might interfere with the dyeing, while avoiding the formation of any oxycellulose. In bleaching for whites (“market bleaching”) it is essential that the white should be as perfect as possible, and such goods are consequently invariably blued after bleaching.
Cotton fabrics are bleached for whites, prints, or dyed items. The processes used for these different categories vary only slightly and mostly in details. The most intense bleaching is for items that will be printed later. For dyed items, the goal isn't necessarily to achieve a perfect white but to eliminate any impurities that could affect the dyeing process, while also preventing the creation of any oxycellulose. In the case of bleaching for whites (“market bleaching”), it's crucial for the white to be as flawless as possible, and these goods are always blued after bleaching.
![]() |
Fig. 1.—Section of a Dash-wheel. |
For small lots (1-20 pieces) the bleaching can be conducted on very simple machinery. Thus many small piece dyers conduct the whole of their bleaching on the jigger, a simple form of dyeing machine on which most cotton piece goods are dyed (see Dyeing). For muslins, laces and other very light fabrics, which will not stand rough handling, the operations are conducted mainly by hand, washing being effected in the dash-wheel (fig. 1), which consists of a cylindrical box, revolving on its axis. It has four divisions, as shown by the dotted lines, and an opening into each division. A number of pieces are put into each, abundance of water is admitted behind, and the knocking of the pieces as they alternately dash from one side of the division to the other during the revolution of the wheel effects the washing. The process lasts from four to six minutes.
For small lots (1-20 pieces), bleaching can be done on very basic machines. Many small-scale dyers carry out all their bleaching on the jigger, a simple type of dyeing machine used for most cotton piece goods (see Dyeing). For muslins, laces, and other very lightweight fabrics that can't withstand harsh treatment, the processes are mostly done by hand, with washing taking place in the dash-wheel (fig. 1), which is a cylindrical box that spins on its axis. It has four sections, as indicated by the dotted lines, and an opening in each section. Several pieces are placed into each section, and plenty of water is let in behind them. The banging of the pieces as they move back and forth during the wheel's rotation washes them. This process lasts for about four to six minutes.
For velveteens, corduroys, heavy drills, pocketings and other fabrics in which creasing has to be avoided as much as possible, the so-called “open bleach” is resorted to, which differs from the ordinary process chiefly in that the goods are treated throughout at full width.
For velveteens, corduroys, heavy drills, pocketings, and other fabrics where creasing must be minimized, the so-called “open bleach” method is used. This process differs from the standard method mainly because the goods are treated in full width the entire time.
The great bulk of cotton pieces is bleached in rope form, i.e. stitched together end to end and laterally collapsed, so that they will pass through a ring of 4 to 5 in. in diameter.
The majority of cotton pieces are bleached in long strips, i.e. stitched together end to end and then folded, so they can fit through a ring that is 4 to 5 inches in diameter.
The first operation which the goods undergo on arriving in the grey-room of the bleachworks is that of stamping with tar or some other indelible material in order that they may be identified after passing through the whole process. They are then stitched together end to end by means of special sewing machines, the stitch being of such a nature (chain stitch) that the thread can be ripped out at one pull at the end of the operations.
The first step the goods go through when they arrive in the grey room of the bleachworks is being stamped with tar or another permanent material so they can be identified after going through the entire process. They are then sewn together end to end using special sewing machines, with a type of stitch (chain stitch) that allows the thread to be pulled out in one go at the end of the process.
Singeing.—In the condition in which the pieces leave the loom and come into the hands of the bleacher, the surface of the fabric is seen to be covered with a nap of projecting fibres which gives it a downy appearance. For some classes of goods this is not a disadvantage, but in the majority of cases, especially for prints where a clean surface is essential, the nap is removed before bleaching. This is usually effected by running the pieces at full width over a couple of arched copper plates heated to a full red heat by direct fire. An arrangement of the kind is shown in fig. 2, in which the singe-plates, a and b, are mounted over the flues of a coal fire. The plate b is most highly heated, a being at the end of the flue farthest removed from the fire. The cloth enters over a rail A, and in passing over the plate a is thoroughly dried and prepared for the singeing it receives when it comes to the highly-heated plate b. A block d, carrying two rails in the space between the plates, can be raised or lowered so as to increase or lessen the pressure of the cloth against the plates, or, if necessary, to lift it quite free of contact with them.
Singeing.—When the fabric leaves the loom and is handed over to the bleacher, its surface shows a nap of protruding fibers that gives it a soft look. For some types of materials, this isn’t an issue, but in most cases, especially for prints where a smooth surface is important, the nap is removed before bleaching. This is typically done by passing the fabric at full width over two arched copper plates heated to a bright red by direct fire. An example of this setup is shown in fig. 2, where the singeing plates, a and b, are positioned over the flues of a coal fire. Plate b is the hottest, while a is at the end of the flue farthest from the fire. The cloth enters over a rail A, and as it moves over plate a, it gets thoroughly dried and prepared for the singeing it undergoes when it reaches the highly heated plate b. A block d, supporting two rails in the space between the plates, can be adjusted up or down to increase or decrease the pressure of the cloth against the plates or, if needed, lift it completely away from contact with them.
![]() |
Fig. 2.—Section of Singe-stove. |
The pieces on leaving the singeing machine are passed either through a water trough or through a steam box with the object of extinguishing sparks, and are then plaited down. The speed at which the pieces travel over the singe plates is necessarily considerable and varies with different classes of material.1
The items that come out of the singeing machine go either through a water trough or a steam box to put out any sparks, and then they are braided. The speed at which the items move over the singe plates has to be quite fast and can change depending on the type of material. 1
In lieu of plates, a cast-iron cylinder is sometimes employed (“roller singeing”), the heating being effected by causing the flame of the fire to be drawn through the roller, which is carried on two small rollers at each end and revolves slowly in the reverse direction to that followed by the piece, thus exposing continuously a freshly heated surface and avoiding uneven cooling.
Instead of using plates, a cast-iron cylinder is sometimes used (“roller singeing”). The heating happens by pulling the flame of the fire through the roller, which is supported on two small rollers at each end and rotates slowly in the opposite direction of the material, continually exposing a freshly heated surface and preventing uneven cooling.
![]() |
Fig. 3.—Gas Singeing Apparatus. |
For figured pieces which have an uneven surface, it is obvious that plate or roller singeing would only affect the portions which project most, leaving the rest untouched. For such goods, “gas singeing” is employed, which consists in running the pieces over a non-luminous gas flame, the breadth of which slightly exceeds that of the piece, or in drawing the flame right through the piece.2 The construction of an ordinary gas singeing apparatus is seen in section in fig. 3. Coal gas mixed with air is sent under pressure through pipe a into the burners b, b, where the mixture burns with an intense heat. The cloth travels in the direction of the arrows, and in passing over the small nap rollers c comes into contact with the flame four times in succession before leaving the machine.
For figured pieces with an uneven surface, it’s clear that plate or roller singeing would only affect the areas that stick out the most, leaving the rest untouched. For these types of goods, “gas singeing” is used, which involves running the pieces over a non-luminous gas flame that slightly wider than the piece, or passing the flame right through the piece.2 The setup of a standard gas singeing device is shown in cross-section in fig. 3. Coal gas mixed with air is pushed through pipe a in the burners b, b, where the mixture burns with intense heat. The cloth moves in the direction of the arrows, and as it goes over the small nap rollers c, it makes contact with the flame four times in a row before leaving the machine.
Gas singeing is also used for plain goods, and being cleaner and under better control has largely replaced plate singeing.
Gas singeing is now used for basic products, and because it's cleaner and easier to control, it has mostly taken the place of plate singeing.
At this stage the goods which have been browned on the surface by singeing are ready for the bleaching operations. A great many innovations have been introduced in recent years in the bleaching of calico, but although it is generally admitted that in point of view of time and economy many of these processes offer considerable advantages, the old process, in which a lime boil precedes the other operations, is still the one which is most largely employed by bleachers in England. In this, the sequence of operations is the following—
At this stage, the goods that have been browned on the surface by burning are ready for the bleaching process. Many innovations have been introduced in recent years for bleaching calico, but even though it's widely accepted that many of these methods save time and money, the traditional method, which involves a lime boil before the other processes, is still the most commonly used by bleachers in England. The sequence of operations is as follows—
Grey Washing.—This operation (which is sometimes omitted) simply consists in running the pieces through an ordinary washing machine (as shown in fig. 5) through water in order to wet them out. On leaving the machine they are piled in a heap and left over night, when fermentation sets in, which results in the starch being to a large extent hydrolysed and rendered soluble in water.
Grey Washing.—This process (which is sometimes skipped) simply involves putting the pieces through a regular washing machine (as shown in fig. 5) with water to soak them. After coming out of the machine, they are stacked in a pile and left overnight, during which fermentation occurs, leading to the starch being mostly broken down and made soluble in water.
Lime Boil.—In this operation, which is also known as bowking (Ger. beuchen), the pieces are first run through milk of lime contained in an ordinary washing machine and of such a strength 52 that they take up about 4% of their weight of lime (CaO). They are then run over winches and guided through smooth porcelain rings (“pot-eyes”) into the kier, where they are evenly packed by boys who enter the vessel through the manhole at the top. It is of the greatest importance that the goods should be evenly packed, for, if channels or loosely-packed places are left, the liquor circulating through the kier, when boiling is subsequently in progress, will follow the line of least resistance, and the result is an uneven treatment. Of the numerous forms of kier in use, the injector kier is the one most generally adopted. This consists of an egg-ended cylindrical vessel constructed of stout boiler plate and shown in sectional elevation in fig. 4. The kier is from 10 to 12 ft. in height and from 6 to 7 ft. in diameter, and stands on three iron legs riveted to the sides, but not shown in the figure. The bottom exit pipe E is covered with a shield-shaped false bottom of boiler plate, or (and this is more usual) the whole bottom of the kier is covered with large rounded stones from the river bed, the object in either case being simply to provide space for the accumulation of liquor and to prevent the pipe E being blocked. The cloth is evenly packed up to within about 3 to 4 ft. of the manholes M, when lime water is run in through the liquor pipe until the level of the liquid reaches within about 2 ft. of the top of the goods. The manholes are now closed, and steam is turned on at the injector J by opening the valve v. The effect of this is to suck the liquor through E, and to force it up through pipe P into the top of the kier, where it dashes against the umbrella-shaped shield U and is distributed over the pieces, through which it percolates, until on arriving at E it is again carried to the top of the kier, a continuous circulation being thus effected. As the circulation proceeds, the steam condensing in the liquor rapidly heats the latter to the boil, and as soon as, in the opinion of the foreman, all air has been expelled, the blow-through tap is closed and the boiling is continued for periods varying from six to twelve hours under 20-60 ℔ pressure. Steam is now turned off, and by opening the valve V the liquor, which is of a dark-brown colour, is forced out by the pressure of the steam it contains.
Lime Boil.—In this process, also known as bowking (Ger. beuchen), the pieces are first run through a milk of lime in a regular washing machine, which is strong enough that they absorb about 4% of their weight in lime (CaO). They're then pulled over winches and guided through smooth porcelain rings (“pot-eyes”) into the kier, where boys enter through the top manhole to pack them evenly. It's crucial that the goods are packed evenly; if there are any channels or loose spots, the circulating liquor will avoid those areas when boiling starts, leading to uneven treatment. Among the various kier designs, the injector kier is the most commonly used. This consists of a cylindrical vessel with an egg-shaped end, made from thick boiler plate, as shown in the sectional elevation in fig. 4. The kier stands 10 to 12 ft. tall and has a diameter of 6 to 7 ft., resting on three iron legs that are riveted to the sides but not visible in the figure. The bottom exit pipe E has a shield-shaped false bottom made of boiler plate, or more commonly, the whole bottom has large rounded stones from the riverbed to create space for liquor accumulation and to prevent blockage of pipe E. The cloth is packed evenly up to about 3 to 4 ft. from the manholes M, then lime water is introduced through the liquor pipe until it rises about 2 ft. below the top of the goods. The manholes are closed, and steam is turned on at the injector J by opening the valve v. This creates suction that pulls the liquor through E and pushes it up through pipe P into the top of the kier, where it hits the umbrella-shaped shield U and spreads over the pieces, filtering through until it reaches E, creating continuous circulation. As the circulation continues, the steam condenses in the liquor, rapidly heating it to boiling. Once the foreman believes all the air has been expelled, the blow-through tap is closed, and boiling is maintained for 6 to 12 hours at 20-60 ℔ pressure. Next, the steam is turned off, and by opening valve V, the dark brown liquor is forced out by the pressure from the steam it holds.
![]() |
Fig 4.—High Pressure Blow-through Kier. |
The pieces are now run through a continuous washing machine, which is provided with a plentiful supply of water. The machine, which is shown in fig. 5, consists essentially of a wooden vat, over which there is a pair of heavy wooden (sycamore) bowls or squeezers. The pieces enter the machine at each end, as indicated by the arrows, and pass rapidly through the bowls down to the bottom of the vat over a loose roller, thence between the first pair of guide pegs through the bowls again, and travel thus in a spiral direction until they arrive at the middle of the machine, when they leave at the side opposite to that on which they entered. The same type of machine is used for liming, chemicking, and souring.
The pieces are now run through a continuous washing machine that has a good supply of water. The machine, shown in fig. 5, consists mainly of a wooden vat, with a pair of heavy wooden (sycamore) bowls or squeezers placed over it. The pieces enter the machine at each end, as indicated by the arrows, and quickly pass through the bowls down to the bottom of the vat over a loose roller. From there, they go between the first pair of guide pegs, through the bowls again, and continue in a spiral direction until they reach the middle of the machine, where they exit on the side opposite to where they entered. The same type of machine is used for liming, chemicking, and souring.
The next operation is the “grey sour,” in which the goods are run through a washing machine containing hydrochloric acid of 2° Tw. strength, with the object of dissolving out the lime which the goods retain in considerable quantity after the lime boil. The goods are then well washed, and are now boiled again in the ash bowking kier, which is similar in construction to the lime kier, with soda ash (3%) and a solution of rosin (1½%) in caustic soda (1¼%) for eight to ten hours. For white bleaching the rosin soap is omitted, soda ash alone being employed.
The next step is the “grey sour,” where the materials are put through a washing machine filled with hydrochloric acid at 2° Tw. strength to dissolve the lime that the goods still hold onto after the lime boil. After this, the goods are thoroughly washed and then boiled again in the ash bowking kier, which is built similarly to the lime kier, using soda ash (3%) and a solution of rosin (1½%) in caustic soda (1¼%) for eight to ten hours. For white bleaching, the rosin soap is left out, and only soda ash is used.
![]() |
Fig 5.—Roller Washing Machine. |
The pieces are now washed free from alkali and the bleaching proper or “chemicking” follows. This operation may be effected in various ways, but the most efficient is to run the goods in a washing machine through bleaching powder solution at ½°-1° Tw., and allow them to lie loosely piled over night, or in some cases for a longer period. They are now washed, run through dilute sulphuric or hydrochloric acid at 2° Tw. (“white sour”) and washed again. Should the white not appear satisfactory at this stage (and this is usually the case with very heavy or dense materials), they are boiled again in soda ash, chemicked with bleaching powder at 1⁄8° Tw. or even weaker, soured and washed. It is of the utmost importance that the final washing should be as thorough as possible, in order to completely remove the acid, for if only small quantities of the latter are left in the goods, they are liable to become tender in the subsequent drying, through formation of hydrocellulose.
The pieces are now cleaned of alkali, and the actual bleaching or “chemicking” follows. This can be done in several ways, but the most effective method is to run the fabric through a washing machine with bleaching powder solution at ½°-1° Tw. and let them sit loosely piled overnight, or in some cases, for a longer time. They are then washed again, treated with dilute sulfuric or hydrochloric acid at 2° Tw. (“white sour”), and washed once more. If the whiteness isn’t satisfactory at this point (which is often the case with very heavy or dense materials), they are boiled again in soda ash, treated with bleaching powder at 1⁄8° Tw. or even a weaker solution, soured, and washed. It's crucial that the final wash is as thorough as possible to fully remove the acid, as any small amounts left in the fabric can cause it to become weak during drying due to the formation of hydrocellulose.
The modern processes of bleaching cotton pieces differ from the one described above, chiefly in that the lime boil is entirely dispensed with, its place being taken by a treatment in the kier with caustic soda (or a mixture of caustic soda and soda ash) and resin soap. The best known and probably the most widely practised of these processes is one which was worked out by the late M. Horace Koechlin in conjunction with Sir William Mather, and this differs from the old process not only in the sequence of the operations but also in the construction of the kier. This consists of a horizontal egg-ended cylinder, and is shown in transverse and longitudinal sections in figs. 6 and 7. One of the ends E constitutes a door which can be raised or lowered by means of the power-driven chain C. The goods to be bleached are packed in wagons W outside the kier, and when filled these are pushed home into the kier, so that the pipes p fit with their flanges on to the fixed pipes at the bottom of the kier. The heating is effected by means of steam pipes at the lowest extremity of the kier, while the circulation of the liquor is brought about by means of the centrifugal pump P, which draws the liquor through the pipes p from beneath the false bottoms of the wagons and showers it over distributors D on to the goods. By this mode of working a considerable economy is effected in point of time, as the kier can be worked almost continuously; for as soon as one lot of goods has been boiled, the wagons are run out and two freshly-packed wagons take their place. The following is the sequence of operations:—The goods are first steeped over night in 53 dilute sulphuric acid, after which they are washed and run through old kier liquor from a previous operation. They are then packed evenly in the wagons which are pushed into the kier, and, the door having been closed, they are boiled for about eight hours at 7-15 lb pressure with a liquor containing soda ash, caustic soda, resin soap and a small quantity of sulphite of soda. The rest of the operations (chemicking, souring and washing) are the same as in the old process.
The modern methods for bleaching cotton fabric are different from what was described earlier, mainly because the lime boiling has been completely replaced with treatment in the kier using caustic soda (or a mix of caustic soda and soda ash) along with resin soap. The most recognized and likely the most commonly used process was developed by the late M. Horace Koechlin along with Sir William Mather. This method differs not only in the order of operations but also in the design of the kier. The kier is a horizontal egg-shaped cylinder, as shown in the transverse and longitudinal sections in figs. 6 and 7. One end, E, serves as a door that can be raised or lowered using a power-driven chain, C. The cotton to be bleached is packed into wagons, W, outside the kier. Once filled, these wagons are pushed into the kier, aligning the pipes, p, with their flanges on the fixed pipes at the bottom of the kier. Heating is done using steam pipes located at the lowest part of the kier, while the liquor is circulated by a centrifugal pump, P, which pulls the liquor through the pipes, p, from below the false bottoms of the wagons and sprays it over distributors, D, onto the fabric. This operation significantly saves time since the kier can operate almost continuously; once one batch is done boiling, the wagons are taken out and replaced with two freshly packed ones. Here’s the sequence of operations: The fabric is first soaked overnight in dilute sulfuric acid, then it’s washed and passed through used kier liquor from a previous process. After that, it’s packed evenly in the wagons, which are pushed into the kier. Once the door is closed, the fabric is boiled for about eight hours at 7-15 pounds of pressure with a liquor that includes soda ash, caustic soda, resin soap, and a small amount of sulfite of soda. The rest of the steps (chemicking, souring, and washing) are the same as in the old process.
![]() |
Fig. 6.—The Mather Kier, cross section. |
![]() |
Fig. 7.—The Mather Kier, longitudinal section. |
A somewhat different principle is involved in the Thies-Herzig process. In this the kier is vertical, and the circulation of the liquor is effected by means of a centrifugal or other form of pump, while the heating of the liquor is brought about outside the kier in a separate vessel between the pump and the kier by means of indirect steam. The sequence of operations is similar to that adopted in the Mather-Koechlin process, differing chiefly from the latter in the first operation, which consists in running the goods, after singeing, through very dilute boiling sulphuric or hydrochloric acid, containing in either case a small proportion of hydrofluoric acid, and then running them through a steam box, the whole operation lasting from twenty to sixty seconds.
A somewhat different principle is used in the Thies-Herzig process. In this method, the kier is vertical, and the circulation of the liquid is achieved using a centrifugal or another type of pump, while the heating of the liquid takes place outside the kier in a separate vessel between the pump and the kier using indirect steam. The steps are similar to those in the Mather-Koechlin process, differing mainly in the first step, which involves running the goods, after singeing, through a very diluted boiling solution of sulfuric or hydrochloric acid, with a small amount of hydrofluoric acid in either case, and then passing them through a steam box. The entire operation lasts from twenty to sixty seconds.
Bleached by any of the above processes, the cloth is next passed over a mechanical contrivance known as a “scutcher,” which opens it out from the rope form to its full breadth, and is then dried on a continuous drying machine. Fig. 8 shows the appearance and construction of an improved form of the horizontal drying machine, which is in more common use for piece goods than the vertical form. The machine consists essentially of a series of copper or tinned iron cylinders, which are geared together so as to run at a uniform speed. Steam at 10-15 ℔ pressure is admitted through the journalled bearings at one side of the machine, and the condensed water is forced out continuously through the bearings at the other side. The pieces pass in the direction of the arrow (fig. 9) over a scrimp rail or expanding roller round the first cylinder, then in a zigzag direction over all succeeding cylinders, and ultimately leave the machine dry, being mechanically plaited down at the other end.
Bleached by any of the above processes, the cloth is then passed over a mechanical device called a “scutcher,” which spreads it out from its rope form to its full width, and then dried on a continuous drying machine. Fig. 8 shows the design and setup of an improved version of the horizontal drying machine, which is more commonly used for piece goods than the vertical type. The machine essentially consists of a series of copper or tinned iron cylinders that are connected to operate at a uniform speed. Steam at 10-15 psi is introduced through the journaled bearings on one side of the machine, and the condensed water is continuously expelled through the bearings on the opposite side. The pieces move in the direction of the arrow (fig. 9) over a scrimp rail or expanding roller around the first cylinder, then in a zigzag pattern over all the subsequent cylinders, and finally exit the machine dry, being mechanically plaited down at the other end.
If the bleaching process has been properly conducted, the pieces should not only show a uniform pure white colour, but their strength should remain unimpaired. Careful experiments conducted by the late Mr. Charles O’Neill showed in fact that carefully bleached cotton may actually be stronger than in the unbleached condition, and this result has since been corroborated by others. Excessive blueing, which is frequently resorted to in order to cover the defects of imperfect bleaching, can readily be detected by washing a sample of the material in water, or, better still, in water containing a little ammonia, and then comparing with the original. The formation of oxycellulose during the bleaching process may either take place in boiling under pressure with lime or caustic soda in consequence of the presence of air in the kier, or through excessive action of bleaching powder, which may either result from the latter not being properly dissolved or being used too strong. Its detection may be effected by dyeing a sample of the bleached cotton in a cold, very dilute solution of methylene blue for about ten minutes, when any portions of the fabric in which the cellulose has been converted into oxycellulose will assume a darker colour than the rest. The depth of the colour is at the same time an indication of the extent to which such conversion has taken place. Most bleached cotton contains some oxycellulose, but as long as the formation has not proceeded far enough to cause tendering, its presence is of no importance in white goods. If, on the other hand, the cotton has to be subsequently dyed with direct cotton colours (see Dyeing), the presence of oxycellulose may result in uneven dyeing. Tendering of the pieces, due to insufficient washing after the final souring operation, is a common defect in bleached goods. As a rule the free acid can be detected by extracting the tendered material with distilled water and adding to the extract a drop of methyl orange solution, when the latter will turn pink if free acid be present. Other defects which may occur in bleached goods are iron stains, mineral oil stains, and defects due to the addition of paraffin wax in the size.
If the bleaching process has been done correctly, the pieces should not only have a consistent pure white color, but also retain their strength. Careful experiments by the late Mr. Charles O’Neill showed that well-bleached cotton can actually be stronger than when it’s unbleached, and this has been confirmed by others. Excessive blueing, often used to hide the flaws of poor bleaching, can easily be detected by washing a sample in water or, even better, in water with a bit of ammonia, and then comparing it to the original. The formation of oxycellulose during the bleaching process can occur when boiling under pressure with lime or caustic soda due to air in the kier, or from too much bleaching powder, which can happen if it isn’t properly dissolved or is used too strong. You can detect it by dyeing a sample of the bleached cotton in a cold, very dilute solution of methylene blue for about ten minutes. Any parts of the fabric where cellulose has turned into oxycellulose will appear darker than the rest. The intensity of the color indicates how much conversion has occurred. Most bleached cotton has some oxycellulose, but as long as it hasn’t reached the point of causing softness, its presence doesn’t matter in white goods. However, if the cotton will be dyed later with direct cotton colors (see Dyeing), the presence of oxycellulose can lead to uneven dyeing. Softening of the pieces due to insufficient washing after the final souring operation is a common flaw in bleached goods. Generally, free acid can be detected by extracting the softened material with distilled water and adding a drop of methyl orange solution, which will turn pink if free acid is present. Other issues that may occur in bleached goods include iron stains, mineral oil stains, and defects from the addition of paraffin wax in the sizing.
Bleaching of Linen.
Linen Bleaching.
The bleaching of linen is a much more complicated and tedious process than the bleaching of cotton. This is due in part to the fact that in linen the impurities amount to 20% or more of the weight of the fibre, whereas in cotton they do not usually exceed 5%. Furthermore these impurities, which include colouring matter, intracellular substances and a peculiar wax known as “flax wax,” are more difficult to attack than those which are present in cotton, and the difficulty is still further enhanced in the case of piece goods owing to their dense or impervious character.
The process of bleaching linen is much more complicated and time-consuming than bleaching cotton. This is partly because the impurities in linen can make up 20% or more of the fiber's weight, while in cotton, they usually don't exceed 5%. Additionally, these impurities, which include color compounds, substances inside the cells, and a unique wax called "flax wax," are tougher to remove than those in cotton. The challenge is even greater for finished fabrics due to their dense or non-porous nature.
Till towards the end of the 18th century the bleaching of linen both in the north of Ireland and in Scotland was accomplished by bowking in cows’ dung and souring with sour milk, the pieces being exposed to light on the grass between these operations for prolonged periods. Subsequently potash and later on soda 54 was substituted for the cows’ dung, while sour milk was replaced by sulphuric acid. This “natural bleach” is still in use in Holland, a higher price being paid for linen bleached in this way than for the same material bleached with the aid of bleaching powder. In the year 1744 Dr. James Ferguson of Belfast received a premium of £300 from the Irish Linen Board for the application of lime in the bleaching of linen. Notwithstanding this reward, the use of lime in the bleaching of linen was for a long time afterwards forbidden in Ireland under statutory penalties, and so late as 1815 Mr Barklie, a respectable linen bleacher of Linen Vale, near Keady, was “prosecuted for using lime in the whitening of linens in his bleachyard.”
Until the late 18th century, the bleaching of linen in both northern Ireland and Scotland was done using a method involving soaking in cow dung and souring with sour milk, with the linen being exposed to sunlight on the grass for extended periods between these processes. Later, potash was replaced by soda, and sour milk was swapped out for sulfuric acid. This “natural bleach” is still used in Holland, where linen bleached this way fetches a higher price than linen bleached with bleaching powder. In 1744, Dr. James Ferguson from Belfast received a £300 award from the Irish Linen Board for introducing lime in the linen bleaching process. Despite this recognition, the use of lime for bleaching linen was banned in Ireland for a long time, carrying legal penalties, and as recently as 1815, Mr. Barklie, a well-respected linen bleacher from Linen Vale near Keady, was prosecuted for using lime to whiten linens in his bleachyard.
![]() |
Fig. 8.—Mather & Platt’s Horizontal Drying Machine. |
The methods at present employed for the bleaching of linen are, except in one or two unimportant particulars, the same as were used in the middle of the 19th century. In principle they resemble those used in cotton bleaching, but require to be frequently repeated, while an additional operation, which is a relic of the old-fashioned process, viz. that of “grassing” or “crofting,” is still essential for the production of the finest whites. Considerably more care has to be exercised in linen bleaching than is the case with cotton, and the process consequently necessitates a greater amount of manual labour. The practical result of this is that whereas cotton pieces can be bleached and finished in less than a week, linen pieces require at least six weeks. Many attempts have naturally been made to shorten and cheapen the process, but without success. The use of stronger reagents and more drastic treatment, which would at first suggest itself, incurs the risk of injury to the fibre, not so much in respect to actual tendering as to the destruction of its characteristic gloss, while if too drastic a treatment is employed at the beginning the colouring matter is liable to become set in the fibre, and it is then almost impossible to remove it. Among the many modern improvements which have been suggested, mention may be made of the use of hypochlorite of soda in place of bleaching powder, the use of oil in the first treatment in alkali (Cross & Parkes), while de Keukelaere suggests the use of sodium sulphide for this purpose. With the object of dispensing with the operation of grassing, which besides necessitating much manual labour is subject to the influences of the atmospheric conditions, Siemens & Halske of Berlin have suggested exposure of the goods in a chamber to the action of electrolytically prepared ozone. Jardin seeks to achieve the same object by steeping the linen in dilute nitric acid.
The methods currently used for bleaching linen are, aside from a few minor details, basically the same as those from the mid-19th century. They are similar in principle to those used in cotton bleaching but need to be repeated more often. Additionally, an old technique known as "grassing" or "crofting" is still necessary to achieve the finest whites. Bleaching linen requires more care than bleaching cotton, which means it involves more manual labor. As a result, while cotton fabrics can be bleached and finished in less than a week, linen takes at least six weeks. Attempts to speed up and reduce the cost of the process have been made but have not succeeded. Using stronger chemicals and harsher treatments might seem like a good idea, but they can damage the fiber, not by making it weak but by destroying its distinctive shine. If an overly aggressive method is used at the start, the color can get set in the fiber, making it nearly impossible to remove later. Among the various modern improvements suggested, one includes using sodium hypochlorite instead of bleaching powder, and applying oil in the first treatment with alkali (Cross & Parkes). De Keukelaere suggests using sodium sulfide for this purpose. To eliminate the grassing process, which requires a lot of manual labor and is affected by the weather, Siemens & Halske from Berlin propose exposing the fabric to electrolytically prepared ozone in a chamber. Jardin aims for the same result by soaking the linen in dilute nitric acid.
Since the qualities of linen which are submitted to the bleacher vary considerably, and the mode of treatment has to be varied accordingly, it is not possible to give more than a bare outline of linen bleaching.
Since the qualities of linen that are sent to the bleacher vary greatly, and the treatment methods need to be adjusted accordingly, it's not possible to provide more than a basic overview of linen bleaching.
Linen is bleached in the yarn and in the piece. Whenever one of the operations is repeated, the strength of the reagent is successively diminished. In yarn-bleaching the sequence of the operations is about as follows:—(1) Boil in kier with soda ash. (2) Reel in bleaching powder. This operation, which is peculiar to linen bleaching, consists in suspending the hanks from a square roller into bleaching powder solution contained in a shallow stone trough. The roller revolves slowly, so that the hanks, while passing continuously through the bleaching powder, are for the greater part of the time being exposed to the air. (3) Sour in sulphuric acid. (4) Scald in soda ash. (The term “scalding” means boiling in a kier.) (5) Reel in bleaching powder. (6) Sour in sulphuric acid. (7) Scald in soda ash. (8) Dip, i.e. steep in bleaching powder. (9) Sour in sulphuric acid. (10) Scald in soda ash. (11) Dip in bleaching powder. (12) Sour in sulphuric acid. For a full white, two more operations are usually required, viz. (13) scald in soda ash, and (14) dip in bleaching powder. Washing intervenes between all these operations.
Linen is bleached both in the yarn and in the fabric. Each time an operation is repeated, the strength of the chemical used is gradually decreased. The steps in yarn bleaching typically go as follows:—(1) Boil in a kier with soda ash. (2) Reel in bleaching powder. This step, which is specific to linen bleaching, involves suspending the hanks from a square roller into a solution of bleaching powder in a shallow stone trough. The roller moves slowly, allowing the hanks to continuously pass through the bleaching powder while spending most of the time exposed to the air. (3) Sour in sulfuric acid. (4) Scald in soda ash. (The term “scalding” means boiling in a kier.) (5) Reel in bleaching powder. (6) Sour in sulfuric acid. (7) Scald in soda ash. (8) Dip, i.e., steep in bleaching powder. (9) Sour in sulfuric acid. (10) Scald in soda ash. (11) Dip in bleaching powder. (12) Sour in sulfuric acid. To achieve a full white, two additional steps are usually necessary, namely (13) scald in soda ash and (14) dip in bleaching powder. Washing takes place between all these steps.
Pieces are not stamped as in the case of cotton, but thread-marked by hand with cotton dyed Turkey red. They are then sewn together end to end, and subjected to the following operations:—
Pieces are not stamped like with cotton, but are thread-marked by hand with cotton dyed Turkey red. They are then sewn together end to end and go through the following processes:—
Boil with lime in kier.
Boil with lime in cauldron.
The pieces are now separated and made up into bundles (except in the case of very light linens, which may pass through the whole of the operations in rope form) and soured with sulphuric acid.
The pieces are now separated and sorted into bundles (except for very light linens, which can go through all the processes in rope form) and treated with sulfuric acid.
First lye boil with soda ash and caustic soda.
First, mix lye with soda ash and caustic soda.
Second lye boil. For some classes of goods no less than six lye boils may be required.
Second lye boil. For certain types of goods, at least six lye boils might be necessary.
Grass between lye boils (according to their number).
Grass between lye boils (according to their number).
Rub with rubbing boards. This is also a speciality in linen bleaching, and consists of a mechanical treatment with soft soap, the object of which is to remove black stains in the yarn.
Rub with rubbing boards. This is also a specialty in linen bleaching and involves a mechanical treatment with soft soap, aimed at removing black stains from the yarn.
Bleach with hypochlorite of soda.
Bleach with sodium hypochlorite.
Scald. The two latter treatments are repeated three to five times, each series constituting a “turn.” Grassing intervenes between each turn, and in some instances the pieces are rubbed before the last soda boil.
Scald. The last two treatments are repeated three to five times, with each set making up a "turn." Grassing happens between each turn, and sometimes the pieces are rubbed before the final soda boil.
![]() |
Fig.. 9.—Diagram showing the Horizontal Drying Machine threaded with Cloth. |
The pieces are next steeped in large vessels (kiers) in weak hypochlorite of soda, and then in weak sulphuric acid, these treatments being repeated several times.
The pieces are then soaked in large containers (kiers) in diluted sodium hypochlorite, followed by soaking in diluted sulfuric acid, with these treatments being repeated several times.
Ultimately the goods are mill-washed, blued with smalt and dried.
Ultimately, the goods are washed in the mill, treated with blue dye, and then dried.
Bleaching of other Vegetable Textile Fabrics.
Bleaching of Other Vegetable Textile Fabrics.
Hemp may be bleached by a process similar to that used for linen, but this is seldom done owing to the expense entailed. China grass is bleached like cotton. Jute contains in its raw state a considerable amount of colouring matter and intracellular substance. Since the individual fibres are very short, the 55 complete removal of the latter would be attended by a disintegration of the material. Although it is possible to bleach jute white, this is seldom if ever carried out on a large scale owing to the great expense involved. A half-bleach on jute is obtained by steeping the goods alternately in bleaching powder (or hypochlorite of soda) and sulphuric acid, washing intervening. For a cream these treatments are repeated.
Hemp can be bleached using a method similar to that used for linen, but this is rarely done because it's too expensive. China grass is bleached like cotton. Jute contains a significant amount of color and internal substances in its raw form. Since the individual fibers are quite short, completely removing the latter would cause the material to fall apart. While it's possible to bleach jute to white, this is rarely done on a large scale due to the high costs involved. A half-bleach on jute is achieved by soaking the fabric alternately in bleaching powder (or sodium hypochlorite) and sulfuric acid, with washing in between. For a cream shade, these treatments are repeated.
Bleaching of Straw.
Straw Bleaching.
In the Luton district, straw is bleached principally in the form of plait, in which form it is imported. The bleaching is effected by steeping the straw for periods varying from twelve hours to several days in fairly strong alkaline peroxide of hydrogen. The number of baths depends upon the quality of straw and the degree of whiteness required. Good whites are thus obtained, and no further process would be necessary if the hats had not subsequently to be “blocked” or pressed at a high temperature which brings about a deterioration of the colour. After bleaching with peroxide and drying, the straw consequently undergoes a further process of sulphuring, i.e. exposure to gaseous sulphurous acid. Panama hats are bleached after making up, but in this case only peroxide of hydrogen is used and a very lengthy treatment entailing sometimes fourteen days’ steeping is required.
In the Luton area, straw is mainly bleached in the form of plait, which is how it's imported. The bleaching process involves soaking the straw for anywhere from twelve hours to several days in a fairly strong alkaline hydrogen peroxide solution. The number of baths depends on the quality of the straw and the level of whiteness needed. Good whites are achieved in this way, and no further process would be necessary if the hats didn’t have to be “blocked” or pressed at a high temperature, which causes the color to fade. After bleaching with peroxide and drying, the straw undergoes another process of sulphuring, meaning it's exposed to gaseous sulphurous acid. Panama hats are bleached after they're made, but in this case, only hydrogen peroxide is used, and a much longer treatment, sometimes spanning fourteen days of soaking, is required.
Bleaching of Wool.
Wool Bleaching.
In the condition in which it is delivered to the manufacturers wool is generally a very impure article, even if it has been washed on the sheep’s back before shearing. The impurities which it contains consist in the main of the natural grease (in reality a kind of wax) exuded from the skin of the sheep and technically known as the “yolk,” the dried-up perspiration from the body of the sheep; technically called “suint,” and dust, dirt, burrs, &c., which mechanically adhere to the sticky surfaces of the fibres. In this condition wool is quite unfit for any manufacturing purposes and must be cleansed before any mechanical operations can be commenced. Formerly the washing was effected in stale urine, which owed its detergent properties mainly to the presence of ammonium carbonate. The stale urine or lant was diluted with four to five times its bulk of water, and in this liquor, heated to 40°-50° C., the washing was effected.
In the state it's delivered to manufacturers, wool is typically pretty impure, even if it’s been washed while still on the sheep before shearing. The impurities mainly consist of the natural grease (actually a type of wax) secreted from the sheep's skin, known as the “yolk,” the dried perspiration from the sheep's body, called “suint,” and dust, dirt, burrs, etc., that stick to the fibers' sticky surfaces. At this stage, wool is completely unfit for any manufacturing use and needs to be cleaned before any processing can begin. In the past, washing was done using stale urine, which had cleansing properties mainly due to ammonium carbonate. The stale urine or lant was mixed with four to five times its volume of water, and the washing was carried out in this solution heated to 40°-50° C.
At the present day this method has been entirely abandoned, the washing or “scouring” being effected with soap, assisted by ammonia, potash, soda or silicate of soda. The finest qualities of wool are washed with soft soap and potash, while for inferior qualities, cheaper detergents are employed. The operation is in principle perfectly simple, the wool being submerged in the warm soap solution, where it is moved about with forks and then taken out and allowed to drain. A second treatment in weaker soap serves to complete the process. In dealing with large quantities, wool-washing machines are employed, which consist essentially of long cast-iron troughs which contain the soap solution. The wool to be washed is fed in at one end of the machine and is slowly propelled to the other end by means of a system of mechanically-driven forks or rakes. As it passes from the machine, it is squeezed through a pair of rollers. Three such machines are usually required for efficient washing, the first containing the strongest and the third the weakest soap.
Nowadays, this method has been completely abandoned, and washing or "scouring" is done using soap, along with ammonia, potash, soda, or silicate of soda. The best quality wool is washed with soft soap and potash, while cheaper detergents are used for lower quality wool. The process is quite straightforward: the wool is submerged in a warm soap solution, stirred with forks, and then removed to drain. A second wash in a weaker soap completes the process. For large quantities, wool-washing machines are used, which are basically long cast-iron troughs filled with soap solution. The wool to be washed is fed in at one end of the machine and is slowly pushed to the other end by a system of mechanically-driven forks or rakes. As it exits the machine, it gets squeezed through a pair of rollers. Typically, three of these machines are needed for efficient washing, with the first using the strongest soap and the third using the weakest.
The washing of wool is in the main a mechanical process, in which the water dissolves out the suint while the soap emulsifies the yolk and thus removes it from the fibre. The attendant earthy impurities pass mechanically into the surrounding liquid and are swilled away.
Washing wool is mostly a mechanical process, where water removes the suint while soap breaks down the yolk, effectively getting it out of the fiber. Any earthy impurities are carried away by the liquid and washed out.
In some works the wool is washed first with water alone, the aqueous extract thus obtained being evaporated to dryness and the residue calcined. A very good quality of potash is thus obtained as a by-product. In many works in Yorkshire and elsewhere, the dirty soap liquors obtained in wool-washing are not allowed to run to waste, but are run into tanks and there treated with sulphuric acid. The effect of this treatment is to decompose the soap, and the fatty acids along with the wool-grease rise as a magma to the surface. The purified product is known in the trade as “Yorkshire grease.”
In some processes, the wool is first washed with just water. The liquid extracted is then evaporated to dryness, and the remaining residue is heated until it turns to ash. This results in a high-quality potash being produced as a by-product. In many facilities in Yorkshire and other places, the soapy wastewater from washing wool isn’t wasted; instead, it’s channeled into tanks and treated with sulfuric acid. This treatment breaks down the soap, causing the fatty acids and wool grease to rise to the surface as a thick substance. The refined product is known in the industry as “Yorkshire grease.”
Attempts have been made from time to time to extract the natural grease from wool by means of organic solvents, such as carbon bisulphide, carbon tetrachloride, petroleum spirit, &c., but have not met with much success.
Attempts have been made occasionally to extract the natural grease from wool using organic solvents like carbon disulfide, carbon tetrachloride, petroleum spirit, etc., but these efforts have not been very successful.
Worsted yarn spun on the English system, as well as woollen yarn and fabrics made from them, contain oil which has been incorporated with the wool to facilitate the spinning. This oil must be got rid of previous to bleaching, and this is effected by scouring in warm soap with or without the assistance of alkalis.
Worsted yarn spun using the English system, along with woolen yarn and fabrics made from them, contains oil that's mixed in with the wool to help with the spinning process. This oil needs to be removed before bleaching, which is done by washing it in warm soapy water, sometimes with the help of alkalis.
The actual bleaching of wool may be effected in two ways, viz. by treating the material either with sulphurous acid or with hydrogen peroxide. Sulphurous acid may either be applied in the gaseous form or in solution as bisulphite of soda. In working by the first method, which is technically known as “stoving,” the scoured yarn is wetted in very weak soap containing a small amount of blue colouring matter, wrung or hydro-extracted and then suspended in a chamber or stove. Sulphur contained in a vessel on the floor of the chamber is now lighted, and the door having been closed, is allowed to burn itself out. The goods are left thus exposed to the sulphur dioxide overnight, when they are taken out and washed in water. For piece goods a somewhat different arrangement is employed, the pieces passing through a slit into a chamber supplied with sulphur dioxide, then slowly up and down over a large number of rollers and ultimately emerging again at the same slit. Wool may also be bleached by steeping in a fairly strong solution of bisulphite of soda and then washing well in water. Wool bleached with sulphurous acid or bisulphite is readily affected by alkalis, the natural yellow colour returning on washing with soap or soda. A more permanent bleach is obtained by steeping the wool in hydrogen peroxide (of 12 volumes strength), let down with about three times its bulk of water and rendered slightly alkaline with ammonia or silicate of soda. Black or brown wools cannot be bleached white, but when treated with peroxide they assume a golden colour, a change which is frequently desired in human hair.
The actual bleaching of wool can be done in two ways: by using either sulfurous acid or hydrogen peroxide. Sulfurous acid can be applied in gaseous form or as a solution of sodium bisulfite. In the first method, known as “stoving,” the cleaned yarn is soaked in a very weak soap that contains a little blue dye, wrung out or hydro-extracted, and then hung in a chamber or stove. Sulfur placed in a container on the chamber floor is ignited, and once the door is closed, it is allowed to burn out. The wool is exposed to sulfur dioxide overnight, after which it is removed and washed in water. For fabric pieces, a slightly different setup is used, with the pieces passing through a slit into a chamber filled with sulfur dioxide, rolling slowly up and down over many rollers, and finally coming out at the same slit. Wool can also be bleached by soaking it in a fairly strong solution of sodium bisulfite and then thoroughly washing it in water. Wool bleached with sulfurous acid or bisulfite can easily be affected by alkalis, causing the natural yellow color to return when washed with soap or soda. A more permanent bleach is achieved by soaking the wool in hydrogen peroxide (12 volumes strength), diluted with about three times its volume of water and made slightly alkaline with ammonia or sodium silicate. Black or brown wools cannot be bleached white, but when treated with peroxide, they take on a golden color, which is often desired for human hair.
Bleaching of Silk.
Silk Bleaching.
In raw silk, the fibre proper is uniformly coated with a proteid substance known as silk-gum, silk-glue or sericine which amounts to 19-25% of the weight of the material, and it is only after the removal of this coating that the characteristic properties of the fibre become apparent. This is effected by the process of “discharging” or “boiling-off,” which consists in suspending the hanks of raw silk over poles or sticks in a vat containing a strong hot soap solution (30% of soap on the weight of the silk). The liquor is kept just below boiling point for two or three hours, the hanks being turned from time to time. During the process, the sericine at first swells up considerably, the fibres becoming slippery, but as the operation proceeds it passes into solution. It is important that only soft water should be used for boiling-off since calcareous impurities are liable to mar the lustre of the silk.
In raw silk, the fiber is evenly coated with a protein substance called silk-gum, silk-glue, or sericine, which makes up 19-25% of the material's weight. It’s only after this coating is removed that the fiber's characteristic properties become noticeable. This is done through a process called “discharging” or “boiling-off,” which involves hanging the hanks of raw silk over poles or sticks in a vat with a strong hot soap solution (30% soap based on the weight of the silk). The solution is kept just below boiling for two or three hours, with the hanks being turned occasionally. During this process, the sericine initially expands significantly, making the fibers slippery, but as it continues, it dissolves. It's important to use only soft water for boiling-off because hard water impurities can ruin the silk's shine.
The silk is now rinsed in weak soda solution and wrung. In this condition it is suitable for being dyed, but if it is to be bleached, the hanks are tied up loosely with smooth tape, put into coarse linen bags to prevent the silk becoming entangled, and boiled again in soap solution which is half as strong as that used in the first operation. The hanks are now taken out, rinsed in a weak soda solution, washed in water and wrung.
The silk is now rinsed in a mild soda solution and wrung out. At this stage, it’s ready to be dyed, but if it needs to be bleached, the hanks are loosely tied with smooth tape, placed in coarse linen bags to keep the silk from getting tangled, and boiled again in a soap solution that’s half as strong as the one used in the first step. The hanks are then removed, rinsed in a weak soda solution, washed in water, and wrung out.
The actual bleaching of silk is usually effected by stoving as in the case of wool, with this difference, that the operation is repeated several times and blueing or tinting with other colours is effected after bleaching. Silk may also be bleached with peroxide of hydrogen, but this method is only used for certain qualities of spun silk and for tussore.
The actual bleaching of silk is typically done by stoving, similar to wool, with the difference being that the process is repeated several times, and blueing or tinting with other colors is done after bleaching. Silk can also be bleached with hydrogen peroxide, but this method is only used for certain types of spun silk and for tussore.
Ornamental feathers are best bleached by steeping in peroxide of hydrogen, rendered slightly alkaline by the addition of ammonia. The same treatment is applied to the bleaching of ivory. If peroxide of hydrogen could be prepared at a moderate cost, it would doubtless find a much more extensive application in bleaching, since it combines efficiency with safety, and gives good results with both vegetable and animal substances.
Ornamental feathers are best bleached by soaking in hydrogen peroxide, made slightly alkaline by adding ammonia. The same method is used for bleaching ivory. If hydrogen peroxide could be produced at a reasonable price, it would likely be used much more widely for bleaching, as it is both effective and safe, and provides good results with both plant and animal materials.
1 Besides being used for cotton goods, plate singeing is also employed for certain classes of worsted goods (alpacas, bunting, &c.), and for most union goods (cotton warp and worsted weft).
1 In addition to being used for cotton products, plate singeing is also applied to some types of worsted materials (like alpacas, bunting, etc.) and for most blended fabrics (cotton warp and worsted weft).
2 A machine working on this principle has been constructed by F. Binder, and the makers of the machine (Messrs Mather & Platt, Ltd.) claim that it does better service than the machines constructed on the older principle.
2 A machine based on this principle has been built by F. Binder, and the manufacturers of the machine (Messrs Mather & Platt, Ltd.) assert that it performs better than the machines built on the older principle.
BLEAK, or Blick (Alburnus lucidus), a small fish of the Cyprinid family, allied to the bream and the minnow, but with a more elongate body, resembling a sardine. It is found in European streams, and is caught by anglers, being also a favourite in aquariums. The well-known and important industry of “Essence Orientale” and artificial pearls, carried on in France and Germany with the crystalline silvery colouring matter of 56 the bleak, was introduced from China about the middle of the 17th century.
BLEAK, or Blick (Alburnus lucidus), is a small fish from the Cyprinid family, related to the bream and the minnow, but with a longer body that looks like a sardine. It lives in European streams and is caught by anglers, also being popular in aquariums. The well-known and significant industry of “Essence Orientale” and artificial pearls, which is conducted in France and Germany using the crystalline silvery coloring material from the bleak, was introduced from China around the middle of the 17th century.
BLEEK, FRIEDRICH (1793-1859), German Biblical scholar, was born on the 4th of July 1793, at Ahrensbök, in Holstein, a village near Lübeck. His father sent him in his sixteenth year to the gymnasium at Lübeck, where he became so much interested in ancient languages that he abandoned his idea of a legal career and resolved to devote himself to the study of theology. After spending some time at the university of Kiel, he went to Berlin, where, from 1814 to 1817, he studied under De Wette, Neander and Schleiermacher. So highly were his merits appreciated by his professors—Schleiermacher was accustomed to say that he possessed a special charisma for the science of “Introduction”—that in 1818 after he had passed the examinations for entering the ministry he was recalled to Berlin as Repetent or tutorial fellow in theology, a temporary post which the theological faculty had obtained for him. Besides discharging his duties in the theological seminary, he published two dissertations in Schleiermacher’s and G.C.F. Lücke’s Journal(1819-1820,1822), one on the origin and composition of the Sibylline Oracles “Über die Entstehung und Zusammensetzung der Sibyllinischen Orakel,” and another on the authorship and design of the Book of Daniel, “Über Verfasser und Zweck des Buches Daniel.” These articles attracted much attention, and were distinguished by those qualities of solid learning, thorough investigation and candour of judgment which characterized all his writings. Bleek’s merits as a rising scholar were recognized by the minister of public instruction, who continued his stipend as Repetent for a third year, and promised further advancement in due time. But the attitude of the political authority underwent a change. De Wette was dismissed from his professorship in 1819, and Bleek, a favourite pupil, incurred the suspicion of the government as an extreme democrat. Not only was his stipend as Repetent discontinued, but his nomination to the office of professor extraordinarius, which had already been signed by the minister Karl Altenstein, was withheld. At length it was found that Bleek had been confounded with a certain Baueleven Blech, and in 1823 he received the appointment.
BLEEK, FRIEDRICH (1793-1859), a German Biblical scholar, was born on July 4, 1793, in Ahrensbök, a village near Lübeck in Holstein. His father sent him to the gymnasium in Lübeck when he was sixteen, where he became so interested in ancient languages that he abandoned his plans to pursue a legal career and decided to focus on studying theology. After spending some time at the University of Kiel, he moved to Berlin, where he studied from 1814 to 1817 under De Wette, Neander, and Schleiermacher. His professors appreciated his abilities so much—Schleiermacher often said he had a special charisma for the field of "Introduction"—that in 1818, after passing his exams to enter the ministry, he was invited back to Berlin as a Repetent or tutorial fellow in theology, a temporary position the theological faculty secured for him. In addition to fulfilling his responsibilities at the theological seminary, he published two dissertations in Schleiermacher’s and G.C.F. Lücke’s Journal (1819-1820, 1822), one on the origin and composition of the Sibylline Oracles titled “Über die Entstehung und Zusammensetzung der Sibyllinischen Orakel,” and another discussing the authorship and purpose of the Book of Daniel, titled “Über Verfasser und Zweck des Buches Daniel.” These articles gained significant attention and were marked by the solid scholarship, thorough research, and honest judgment that characterized all his work. Bleek’s accomplishments as an emerging scholar were acknowledged by the minister of public instruction, who continued his stipend as Repetent for a third year and promised future advancement. However, the political climate shifted. De Wette was dismissed from his professorship in 1819, and Bleek, being a favored student, aroused the government’s suspicion as an extreme democrat. As a result, not only was his stipend as Repetent stopped, but his appointment to the role of professor extraordinarius, which had already been signed off by Minister Karl Altenstein, was put on hold. Eventually, it was discovered that Bleek was confused with someone named Baueleven Blech, and in 1823 he finally received the appointment.
During the six years that Bleek remained at Berlin, he twice declined a call to the office of professor ordinarius of theology, once to Greifswald and once to Königsberg. In 1829, however, he was induced to accept Lücke’s chair in the recently-founded university of Bonn, and entered upon his duties there in the summer of the same year. For thirty years he laboured with ever-increasing success, due not to any attractions of manner or to the enunciation of novel or bizarre opinions, but to the soundness of his investigations, the impartiality of his judgments, and the clearness of his method. In 1843 he was raised to the office of consistorial councillor, and was selected by the university to hold the office of rector, a distinction which has not since been conferred upon any theologian of the Reformed Church. He died suddenly of apoplexy on the 27th of February 1859.
During the six years that Bleek was in Berlin, he turned down offers to become a full professor of theology twice—once for Greifswald and once for Königsberg. However, in 1829, he was persuaded to take Lücke’s position at the newly established university of Bonn, starting his role there in the summer of that year. For thirty years, he worked with growing success, achieved not through charisma or outlandish opinions, but because of the reliability of his research, the fairness of his assessments, and the clarity of his approach. In 1843, he was appointed consistorial councillor and selected by the university to serve as rector, a recognition that has not been given to any theologian from the Reformed Church since. He passed away suddenly from a stroke on February 27, 1859.
Bleek’s works belong entirely to the departments of Biblical criticism and exegesis. His views on questions of Old Testament criticism were “advanced” in his own day; for on all the disputed points concerning the unity and authorship of the books of the Old Covenant he was opposed to received opinion. But with respect to the New Testament his position was conservative. An opponent of the Tübingen school, his defence of the genuineness and authenticity of the gospel of St. John is among the ablest that have been written; and although on some minor points his views did not altogether coincide with those of the traditional school, his critical labours on the New Testament must nevertheless be regarded as among the most important contributions to the maintenance of orthodox opinions. His greatest work, his commentary on the epistle to the Hebrews (Brief an die Hebräer erläutert durch Einleitung, Übersetzung, und fortlaufenden Commentar, in three parts, 1828, 1836 and 1840) won the highest praise from men like De Wette and Fr. Delitzsch. This work was abridged by Bleek for his college lectures, and was published in that condensed form in 1868. In 1846 he published his contributions to the criticism of the gospels (Beiträge zur Evangelien Kritik, pt. i.), which contained his defence of St John’s gospel, and arose out of a review of J.H.A. Ebrard’s Wissenschaftliche Kritik der Evangelischen Geschichte (1842).
Bleek’s works are entirely focused on Biblical criticism and exegesis. His views on Old Testament criticism were considered “progressive” for his time; he disagreed with the prevailing opinions on all the controversial issues regarding the unity and authorship of the books of the Old Covenant. However, when it came to the New Testament, his stance was more conservative. As a critic of the Tübingen school, his defense of the authenticity of the gospel of St. John is among the most skillful ever written; even though he disagreed with the traditional school on some minor points, his critical work on the New Testament is still regarded as a key contribution to upholding orthodox beliefs. His most significant work, his commentary on the epistle to the Hebrews (Brief an die Hebräer erläutert durch Einleitung, Übersetzung, und fortlaufenden Commentar, in three parts, 1828, 1836, and 1840) received high praise from figures like De Wette and Fr. Delitzsch. Bleek condensed this work for his college lectures, and it was published in that shorter format in 1868. In 1846, he published his contributions to the criticism of the gospels (Beiträge zur Evangelien Kritik, pt. i.), which included his defense of St. John’s gospel and was based on a review of J.H.A. Ebrard’s Wissenschaftliche Kritik der Evangelischen Geschichte (1842).
After his death were published:—(1) His Introduction to the Old Testament (Einleitung in das Alte Testament), (3rd ed., 1869); Eng. trans. by G.H. Venables (from 2nd ed., 1869); in 1878 a new edition (the 4th) appeared under the editorship of J. Wellhausen, who made extensive alterations and additions; (2) his Introduction to the New Testament (3rd ed., W. Mangold, 1875), Eng. trans. (from 2nd German ed.) by William Urwick (1869, 1870); (3) his Exposition of the First Three Gospels (Synoptische Erklarung der drei ersten Evangelien), by H. Holtzmann (1862); (4) his Lectures on the Apocalypse (Vorlesungen über die Apokalypse), (Eng. trans. 1875). Besides these there has also appeared a small volume containing Lectures on Colossians, Philemon and Ephesians (Berlin, 1865). Bleek also contributed many articles to the Studien und Kritiken. For further information as to Bleek’s life and writings, see Kamphausen’s article in Herzog-Hauck, Realencyklopadie; Frédéric Lichtenberger’s Histoire des idées religieuses en Allemagne, vol. iii.; Diestel’s Geschichte des Allen Testamentes (1869); and T.K. Cheyne’s Founders of Old Testament Criticism (1893).
After his death, the following were published: (1) His Introduction to the Old Testament (Einleitung in das Alte Testament), 3rd ed., 1869; English translation by G.H. Venables (from the 2nd ed., 1869); a new edition (the 4th) appeared in 1878 edited by J. Wellhausen, who made extensive changes and additions; (2) his Introduction to the New Testament (3rd ed., W. Mangold, 1875), English translation (from the 2nd German ed.) by William Urwick (1869, 1870); (3) his Exposition of the First Three Gospels (Synoptische Erklarung der drei ersten Evangelien), by H. Holtzmann (1862); (4) his Lectures on the Apocalypse (Vorlesungen über die Apokalypse), English translation 1875. In addition to these, a small volume containing Lectures on Colossians, Philemon and Ephesians was released (Berlin, 1865). Bleek also wrote many articles for the Studien und Kritiken. For more information about Bleek’s life and works, see Kamphausen’s article in Herzog-Hauck, Realencyklopadie; Frédéric Lichtenberger’s Histoire des idées religieuses en Allemagne, vol. iii.; Diestel’s Geschichte des Allen Testamentes (1869); and T.K. Cheyne’s Founders of Old Testament Criticism (1893).
BLEEK, WILHELM HEINRICH IMMANUEL (1827-1875), German philologist, son of Friedrich Bleek, was born in 1827 at Berlin. He studied first at Bonn and afterwards at Berlin, where his attention was directed towards the philological peculiarities of the South African languages. In his doctor’s dissertation (Bonn, 1851), De nominum generibus linguarum Africae Australis, he endeavoured to show that the Hottentot language was of North African descent. In 1854 his health prevented him accompanying Dr W.B. Baikie in the expedition to the Niger; but in the following year he accompanied Bishop Colenso to Natal, and was enabled to prosecute his researches into the language and customs of the Kaffirs. Towards the close of 1856 he settled at Cape Town, and in 1857 was appointed interpreter by Sir George Grey. In 1859 he was compelled by ill health to visit Europe, and on his return in the following year he was made librarian of the valuable collection of books presented to the colony by Sir George Grey. In 1869 he visited England, where the value of his services was recognized by a pension from the civil list. He died at Cape Town on the 17th of August 1875. His works, which are of considerable importance for African and Australian philology, consist of the Vocabulary of the Mozambique Language (London, 1856); Handbook of African, Australian and Polynesian Philology (Cape Town and London, 3 vols., 1858-1863); Comparative Grammar of, the South African Languages (vol. i., London, 1869); Reynard the Fox in South Africa, or Hottentot Fables and Tales (London, 1864); Origin of Language (London, 1869).
BLEEK, WILHELM HEINRICH IMMANUEL (1827-1875), German philologist and son of Friedrich Bleek, was born in 1827 in Berlin. He initially studied at Bonn and later at Berlin, where he focused on the linguistic characteristics of South African languages. In his doctoral dissertation (Bonn, 1851), De nominum generibus linguarum Africae Australis, he argued that the Hottentot language has North African origins. In 1854, poor health prevented him from joining Dr. W.B. Baikie on an expedition to the Niger; however, the following year he traveled with Bishop Colenso to Natal, allowing him to further investigate the language and customs of the Kaffirs. By the end of 1856, he settled in Cape Town, and in 1857, he was appointed interpreter by Sir George Grey. In 1859, due to health issues, he had to go to Europe, and upon his return the next year, he became the librarian of the valuable collection of books donated to the colony by Sir George Grey. In 1869, he visited England, where his contributions were acknowledged with a pension from the civil list. He passed away in Cape Town on August 17, 1875. His works, which are highly significant for African and Australian philology, include Vocabulary of the Mozambique Language (London, 1856); Handbook of African, Australian and Polynesian Philology (Cape Town and London, 3 vols., 1858-1863); Comparative Grammar of the South African Languages (vol. i., London, 1869); Reynard the Fox in South Africa, or Hottentot Fables and Tales (London, 1864); and Origin of Language (London, 1869).
![]() |
Fig. 1. |
BLENDE, or Sphalerite, a naturally occurring zinc sulphide, ZnS, and an important ore of zinc. The name blende was used by G. Agricola in 1546, and is from the German blenden, to blind, or deceive, because the mineral resembles lead ore in appearance but contains no lead, and was consequently often rejected as worthless. Sphalerite, introduced by E.F. Glocker in 1847, has the same meaning (σφαλερός, deceptive), and so have the miners’ terms “mock ore,” “false lead,” and “blackjack.” The term “blende” was at one time used in a generic sense, and as such enters into the construction of several old names of German origin; the species under consideration is therefore sometimes distinguished as zinc-blende.
BLENDE or Sphalerite, is a naturally occurring zinc sulfide, ZnS, and an important ore for zinc. The name blende was first used by G. Agricola in 1546 and comes from the German blenden, meaning to blind or deceive, because the mineral looks like lead ore but doesn't contain any lead, leading it to be often dismissed as worthless. Sphalerite, introduced by E.F. Glocker in 1847, conveys the same meaning (unsafe, deceptive), and miners have referred to it using terms like “mock ore,” “false lead,” and “blackjack.” The term “blende” was once used more generally, which is why it appears in the names of several older German-origin minerals; therefore, the species in question is sometimes specifically called zinc-blende.
Crystals of blende belong to that subclass of the cubic system in which there are six planes of symmetry parallel to the faces of the rhombic dodecahedron and none parallel to the cubic faces; in other words, the crystals are cubic with inclined hemihedrism, and have no centre of symmetry. The fundamental form is the tetrahedron. Fig. 1 shows a combination of two tetrahedra, in which the four faces of one tetrahedron are larger than the four faces of the other: further, the two sets of faces differ in surface 57 characters, those of one set being dull and striated, whilst those of the other set are bright and smooth. A common form, shown in fig. 2, is a combination of the rhombic dodecahedron with a three-faced tetrahedron y (311); the six faces meeting in each triad axis are often rounded together into low conical forms. The crystals are frequently twinned, the twin-axis coinciding with a triad axis; a rhombic dodecahedron so twinned (fig. 3) has no re-entrant angles. An important character of blende is the perfect dodecahedral cleavage, there being six directions of cleavage parallel to the faces of the rhombic dodecahedron, and angles between which are 60°.
Crystals of blende belong to a subclass of the cubic system that has six planes of symmetry aligned with the faces of the rhombic dodecahedron but doesn’t align with the cubic faces. In simpler terms, the crystals are cubic with inclined hemihedrism and lack a center of symmetry. The basic shape is the tetrahedron. Fig. 1 illustrates a combination of two tetrahedra, where the four faces of one tetrahedron are larger than the four faces of the other. Additionally, the two sets of faces have different surface characteristics; one set is dull and striated, while the other set is bright and smooth. A common form, shown in Fig. 2, combines the rhombic dodecahedron with a three-faced tetrahedron y (311); the six faces that meet at each triad axis are often rounded into low conical shapes. The crystals are often twinned, with the twin-axis aligning with a triad axis; a rhombic dodecahedron that is twinned (Fig. 3) has no re-entrant angles. A notable feature of blende is its perfect dodecahedral cleavage, having six cleavage directions parallel to the faces of the rhombic dodecahedron, with angles between them measuring 60°.
When chemically pure, which is rarely the case, blende is colourless and transparent; usually, however, the mineral is yellow, brown or black, and often opaque, the depth of colour and degree of transparency depending on the amount of iron present. The streak, or colour of the powder, is brownish or light yellow, rarely white. The lustre is resinous to adamantine, and the index of refraction high (2.369 for sodium light). The substance is usually optically isotropic, though sometimes it exhibits anomalous double refraction; fibrous zinc sulphide which is doubly refracting is to be referred to the hexagonal species wurtzite. The specific gravity is 4.0, and the hardness 4. Crystals exhibit pyroelectrical characters, since they possess four uniterminal triad axes of symmetry.
When it's chemically pure, which is uncommon, blende is colorless and transparent; however, the mineral is usually yellow, brown, or black, and often opaque. The intensity of the color and level of transparency depend on the amount of iron present. The streak, or the color of the powder, is brownish or light yellow, and it's rarely white. The luster is resinous to adamantine, and the refractive index is high (2.369 for sodium light). The substance is usually optically isotropic, but sometimes it shows unusual double refraction; fibrous zinc sulfide that exhibits double refraction is classified as the hexagonal species wurtzite. The specific gravity is 4.0, and the hardness is 4. Crystals show pyroelectric properties because they have four uniterminal triad axes of symmetry.
![]() | |
Fig. 2. | Fig. 3. |
Crystals of blende are of very common occurrence, but owing to twinning and distortion and curvature of the faces, they are often rather complex and difficult to decipher. For this reason the mineral is not always readily recognized by inspection, though the perfect dodecahedral cleavage, the adamantine lustre, and the brown streak are characters which may be relied upon. The mineral is also frequently found massive, with a coarse or fine granular structure and a crystalline fracture; sometimes it occurs as a soft, white, amorphous deposit resembling artificially precipitated zinc sulphide. A compact variety of a pale liver-brown colour and forming concentric layers with a reniform surface is known in Germany as Schalenblende or Leberblende.
Crystals of blende are very common, but because of twinning, distortion, and curved faces, they can often be pretty complex and hard to identify. For this reason, the mineral isn’t always easily recognized just by looking at it, although you can rely on its perfect dodecahedral cleavage, shiny adamantine luster, and brown streak. The mineral is also often found in a massive form, either with a coarse or fine granular structure and a crystalline fracture; sometimes it appears as a soft, white, amorphous deposit that looks like artificially precipitated zinc sulfide. There’s a compact variety that has a pale liver-brown color, forming concentric layers with a kidney-shaped surface, which is known in Germany as Schalenblende or Leberblende.
A few varieties of blende are distinguished by special names, these varieties depending on differences in colour and chemical composition. A pure white blende from Franklin in New Jersey is known as cleiophane; snow-white crystals are also found at Nordmark in Vermland, Sweden. Black blende containing ferrous sulphide, in amounts up to 15 or 20% isomorphously replacing zinc sulphide, is known as marmatite (from Marmato near Guayabal in Colombia, South America) and christophite (from St Christophe mine at Breitenbrunn near Eibenstock in Saxony). Transparent blende of a red or reddish-brown colour, such as that found near Holywell in Flintshire, is known as “ruby-blende” or “ruby-zinc.” Přibramite is the name given to a cadmiferous blende from Přibram in Bohemia. Other varieties contain small amounts of mercury, tin, manganese or thallium. The elements gallium and indium were discovered in blende.
A few types of blende have specific names based on their color and chemical composition. A pure white blende from Franklin in New Jersey is called cleiophane; snow-white crystals can also be found at Nordmark in Värmland, Sweden. Black blende that contains ferrous sulfide, which replaces zinc sulfide in amounts of 15 to 20%, is known as marmatite (from Marmato near Guayabal in Colombia) and christophite (from the St Christophe mine at Breitenbrunn near Eibenstock in Saxony). Transparent blende with a red or reddish-brown color, like that found near Holywell in Flintshire, is called “ruby-blende” or “ruby-zinc.” The cadmiferous blende from Přibram in Bohemia is known as Přibramite. Other varieties contain small amounts of mercury, tin, manganese, or thallium. The elements gallium and indium were discovered in blende.
Blende occurs in metalliferous veins, often in association with galena, also with chalcopyrite, barytes, fluorspar, &c. In ore-deposits containing both lead and zinc, such as those filling cavities in the limestones of the north of England and of Missouri, the galena is usually found in the upper part of the deposit, the blende not being reached until the deeper parts are worked. Blende is also found sporadically in sedimentary rocks; for example, in nodules of clay-ironstone in the Coal Measures, in the cement-doggers of the Lias, and in the casts of fossil shells. It has occasionally been found on the old timbers of mines. In these cases the zinc sulphide has probably arisen from the reduction of sulphate by organic matter.
Blende occurs in metal-rich veins, often alongside galena, as well as chalcopyrite, barytes, fluorspar, etc. In ore deposits that contain both lead and zinc, like those filling cavities in the limestone regions of northern England and Missouri, galena is usually located in the upper part of the deposit, while blende is typically found only after the deeper areas are mined. Blende can also be found sporadically in sedimentary rocks; for instance, in nodules of clay ironstone within the Coal Measures, in the cement-doggers of the Lias, and in the casts of fossil shells. It has occasionally been discovered on old mine timbers. In these cases, the zinc sulfide likely formed from the reduction of sulfate by organic matter.
Localities for fine crystallized specimens are numerous. Mention may be made of the brilliant black crystals from Alston Moor in Cumberland, St Agnes in Cornwall and Derbyshire. Yellow crystals are found at Kapnik-Bánya, near Nagy-Bánya in Hungary. Transparent yellow cleavage masses of large size occur in limestone in the zinc mines at Picos de Europa in the province of Santander, Spain. Beautiful isolated tetrahedra of transparent yellow blende are found in the snow-white crystalline dolomite of the Binnenthal in the Valais, Switzerland.
Locations for high-quality crystallized specimens are plentiful. Notable examples include the striking black crystals from Alston Moor in Cumberland, St Agnes in Cornwall, and Derbyshire. Yellow crystals can be found at Kapnik-Bánya, near Nagy-Bánya in Hungary. Large, transparent yellow cleavage masses occur in limestone within the zinc mines at Picos de Europa in the province of Santander, Spain. Gorgeous isolated tetrahedra of transparent yellow blende are located in the snow-white crystalline dolomite of the Binnenthal in Valais, Switzerland.
BLENHEIM (Ger. Blindheim), a village of Bavaria, Germany, in the district of Swabia, on the left bank of the Danube, 30 m. N.E. from Ulm by rail, a few miles below Höchstädt. Pop. 700. It was the scene of the defeat of the French and Bavarians under Marshals Tallard and Marsin, on the 13th of August 1704, by the English and the Austrians under the duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene. In consideration of his military services and especially his decisive victory, a princely mansion was erected by parliament for the duke of Marlborough near Woodstock in Oxfordshire, England, and was named Blenheim Palace after this place.
BLENHEIM (Ger. Blindheim), a village in Bavaria, Germany, located in the Swabia district on the left bank of the Danube, 30 miles northeast of Ulm by train, just a few miles downstream from Höchstädt. Population: 700. It was the site of the defeat of the French and Bavarians led by Marshals Tallard and Marsin on August 13, 1704, by the English and Austrians under the Duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene. In recognition of his military achievements, especially this decisive victory, Parliament built a grand mansion for the Duke of Marlborough near Woodstock in Oxfordshire, England, naming it Blenheim Palace after this location.
The battle of Blenheim is also called Höchstädt, but the title accepted in England has the advantage that it distinguishes this battle from that won on the same ground a year previously, by the elector of Bavaria over the imperial general Styrum (9-20 September 1703), and from the fighting between the Austrians under Krag and the French under Moreau in June 1800 (see French Revolutionary Wars). The ground between the hills and the marshy valley of the Danube forms a defile through which the main road from Donauwörth led to Ulm; parallel streams divide the narrow plain into strips. On one of these streams, the Nebel, the French and Bavarians (somewhat superior in numbers) took up their position facing eastward, their right flank resting on the Danube, their left in the under-features of the hilly ground, and their front covered by the Nebel, on which were the villages of Oberglau, Unterglau and Blenheim. The imperialist army of Eugene and the allies under Marlborough (52,000 strong) encamped 5 m. to the eastward along another stream, their flanks similarly protected. On the 2nd-13th of August 1704 Eugene and Marlborough set their forces in motion towards the hostile camps; several streams had to be crossed on the march, and it was seven o’clock (five hours after moving off) when the British of Marlborough’s left wing, next the Danube, deployed opposite Blenheim, which Tallard thereupon garrisoned with a large force of his best infantry, aided by a battery of 24-pounder guns. The French and Bavarians were taken somewhat by surprise, and were arrayed in two separate armies, each with its cavalry on the wings and its foot in the centre. Thus the centre of the combined forces consisted of the cavalry of Marsin’s right and of Tallard’s left.
The Battle of Blenheim is also known as Höchstädt, but the name commonly used in England helps to differentiate this battle from one that took place on the same ground a year earlier, where the Elector of Bavaria defeated the imperial general Styrum (September 9-20, 1703), and from the conflict between the Austrians under Krag and the French under Moreau in June 1800 (see French Revolutionary Wars). The area between the hills and the marshy valley of the Danube forms a narrow passage through which the main road from Donauwörth to Ulm runs; parallel streams split the narrow plain into strips. On one of these streams, the Nebel, the French and Bavarians (who had a bit of an advantage in numbers) set up their position facing east, with their right flank along the Danube, their left near the hilly terrain, and their front protected by the Nebel, where the villages of Oberglau, Unterglau, and Blenheim were located. The imperial army led by Eugene and the allies under Marlborough (totaling 52,000 soldiers) camped 5 miles to the east along another stream, with their flanks also protected. From August 2nd to 13th, 1704, Eugene and Marlborough moved their troops toward the enemy camps; several streams had to be crossed during the march, and at 7 o’clock (five hours after setting out), Marlborough’s left wing, closest to the Danube, positioned themselves in front of Blenheim, which Tallard fortified with a large contingent of his best infantry, supported by a battery of 24-pounder guns. The French and Bavarians were somewhat caught off guard, and they were organized into two separate armies, each with cavalry on the flanks and infantry in the center. Thus, the center of the combined forces included the cavalry from Marsin’s right and Tallard’s left.
Here was the only good ground for mounted troops, and Marlborough followed Tallard’s example when forming up to attack, but it resulted from the dispositions of the French marshal that this weak point of junction of his two armies was exactly that at which decisive action was to be expected. Tallard therefore had a few horse on his right between the Danube and Blenheim, a mass of infantry in his centre at Blenheim itself, and a long line of cavalry supported by a few battalions forming his left wing in the plain, and connecting with the right of Marsin’s army. This army was similarly drawn up. The cavalry right wing was in the open, the French infantry near Oberglau, which was strongly held, the Bavarian infantry next on the left, and finally the Bavarian cavalry with a force of foot on the extreme left in the hills. The elector of Bavaria commanded his own troops in person. Marlborough and Eugene on their part were to attack respectively Tallard and Marsin. The 58 right wing under Eugene had to make a difficult march over broken ground before it could form up for battle, and Marlborough waited, with his army in order of battle between Unterglau and Blenheim, until his colleague should be ready. At 12.30 the battle opened. Lord Cutts, with a detachment of Marlborough’s left wing, attacked Blenheim with the utmost fury. A third of the leading brigade (British) was killed and wounded in the vain attempt to break through the strong defences of the village, and some French squadrons charged upon it as it retired; a colour was captured in the mêlée, but a Hessian brigade in second line drove back the cavalry and retook the colour. After the repulse of these squadrons, in which some British cavalry from the centre took part, Cutts again moved forward. The second attack, though pressed even more fiercely, fared no better than the first, and the losses were heavier than before. The duke then ordered Cutts to observe the enemy in Blenheim, and concentrated all his attention on the centre. Here, between Unterglau and Blenheim, preparations were being made, under cover of artillery, for the crossing of the Nebel, and farther up-stream a corps was sent to attack Oberglau. This attack failed completely, and it was not until Marlborough himself, with fresh battalions, drove the French back into Oberglau that the allies were free to cross the Nebel.
Here was the only solid ground for mounted troops, and Marlborough followed Tallard’s example when preparing to attack. However, it was due to the French marshal's arrangements that this weak spot where his two armies met was exactly where a decisive battle was anticipated. Tallard had a few cavalry on his right between the Danube and Blenheim, a large mass of infantry in his center at Blenheim itself, and a long line of cavalry backed by several battalions forming his left wing across the plain, connecting with Marsin’s army on the right. Marsin’s army was arranged similarly, with the cavalry on the right in the open, the French infantry near Oberglau, which was well-fortified, the Bavarian infantry next on the left, and finally the Bavarian cavalry with foot soldiers on the far left in the hills. The elector of Bavaria personally commanded his own troops. Marlborough and Eugene were set to attack Tallard and Marsin, respectively. The 58 right wing under Eugene had to navigate difficult terrain before it could position itself for battle, while Marlborough waited for his ally to be ready, with his army arranged for combat between Unterglau and Blenheim. At 12:30, the battle began. Lord Cutts, leading a detachment from Marlborough’s left wing, fiercely attacked Blenheim. A third of the leading brigade (British) was killed or wounded in a futile attempt to breach the strong defenses of the village, and some French squadrons charged as they retreated; a flag was captured in the chaos, but a Hessian brigade in the second line drove back the cavalry and reclaimed the flag. After repelling those squadrons, which included some British cavalry from the center, Cutts pushed forward again. The second assault, although even more intense, ended no better than the first and resulted in heavier losses. The duke then instructed Cutts to keep an eye on the enemy in Blenheim and focused all his attention on the center. Here, between Unterglau and Blenheim, preparations were being made, shielded by artillery, for crossing the Nebel, and further upstream, a corps was dispatched to attack Oberglau. This assault was a complete failure, and it wasn't until Marlborough himself, with fresh battalions, forced the French back into Oberglau that the allies were finally able to cross the Nebel.
In the meanwhile the first line of Marlborough’s infantry had crossed lower down, and the first line of cavalry, following them across, had been somewhat severely handled by Tallard’s cavalry. The squadrons under the Prussian general Bothmar, however, made a dashing charge, and achieved considerable temporary success. Eugene was now closely engaged with the elector of Bavaria, and both sides were losing heavily. But Eugene carried out his holding attack successfully. Marsin dared not reinforce Tallard to any extent, and the duke was preparing for the grand attack. His whole force, except the detachment of Cutts, was now across the Nebel, and he had formed it in several lines with the cavalry in front. Marlborough himself led the cavalry; the French squadrons received the attack at the halt, and were soon broken. Marsin’s right swung back towards its own army. Those squadrons of Tallard’s left which retained their order fell back towards the Danube, and a great gap was opened in the centre of the defence, through which the victorious squadrons poured. Wheeling to their left the pursuers drove hundreds of fugitives into the Danube, and Eugene was now pressing the army of Marsin towards Marlborough, who re-formed and faced northward to cut off its retreat. Tallard was already a prisoner, but in the dusk and confusion Marsin slipped through between the duke and Eugene. General Churchill, Marlborough’s brother, had meanwhile surrounded the French garrison of Blenheim; and after one or two attempts to break out, twenty-four battalions of infantry and four regiments of dragoons, many of them the finest of the French army, surrendered.
Meanwhile, the first line of Marlborough’s infantry had crossed lower down, and the first line of cavalry, following them, faced some serious challenges from Tallard’s cavalry. However, the squadrons led by the Prussian general Bothmar made a bold charge and achieved significant temporary success. Eugene was now in a close battle with the elector of Bavaria, with both sides suffering heavy losses. But Eugene successfully executed his holding attack. Marsin didn’t dare to reinforce Tallard significantly, and the duke was getting ready for the main attack. His entire force, except for the detachment of Cutts, was now across the Nebel and organized into several lines with the cavalry in front. Marlborough himself led the cavalry; the French squadrons were hit while halted and were soon overwhelmed. Marsin’s right began to retreat towards its own army. Those squadrons on Tallard’s left that managed to maintain their order fell back towards the Danube, opening a large gap in the center of the defense, through which the victorious squadrons surged. Turning to the left, the pursuers drove hundreds of fleeing troops into the Danube, and Eugene was now pushing Marsin’s army towards Marlborough, who reorganized and faced north to cut off their retreat. Tallard was already a prisoner, but in the dusk and confusion, Marsin managed to slip through between the duke and Eugene. Meanwhile, General Churchill, Marlborough’s brother, had surrounded the French garrison at Blenheim; after one or two attempts to break out, twenty-four battalions of infantry and four regiments of dragoons, many of whom were some of the best in the French army, surrendered.
The losses of the allies are stated at 4500 killed and 7500 wounded (British 670 killed and 1500 wounded). Of the French and Bavarians 11,000 men, 100 guns and 200 colours and standards were taken; besides the killed and wounded, the numbers of which vere large but uncertain—many were drowned in the Danube. Marsin’s army, though it lost heavily, was drawn off in good order; Tallard’s was almost annihilated.
The allies suffered 4,500 killed and 7,500 wounded (with the British having 670 killed and 1,500 wounded). The French and Bavarians lost 11,000 men, along with 100 guns and 200 colors and standards; the casualties were significant but not precisely known, as many drowned in the Danube. Marsin’s army, despite heavy losses, was withdrawn in good order, while Tallard’s army was nearly destroyed.
BLENNERHASSETT, HARMAN (1765-1831), Irish-American lawyer, son of an Irish country gentleman of English stock settled in Co. Kerry, was born on the 8th of October 1765. He was educated at Trinity College, Dublin, and in 1790 was called to the Irish bar. After living for several years on the continent, he married in 1796 his niece, Margaret Agnew, daughter of Robert Agnew, the lieutenant-governor of the Isle of Man. Ostracised by their families for this step the couple decided to settle in America, where Blennerhassett in 1798 bought an island in the Ohio river about 2 m. below Parkersburg, West Virginia. Here in 1805 he received a visit from Aaron Burr (q.v.), in whose conspiracy he became interested, furnishing liberal funds for its support, and offering the use of his island as a rendezvous for the gathering of arms and supplies and the training of volunteers. When the conspiracy collapsed, the mansion and island were occupied and plundered by the Virginia militia. Blennerhassett fled, was twice arrested and remained a prisoner until after Burr’s release. The island was then abandoned, and Blennerhassett was in turn a cotton planter in Mississippi, and a lawyer (1819-1822) in Montreal, Canada. After returning to Ireland, he died in the island of Guernsey on the 2nd of February 1831. His wife, who had considerable literary talent and who published The Deserted Isle (1822) and The Widow of the Rock and Other Poems (1824), returned to the United States in 1840, and died soon afterward in New York City while attempting to obtain through Congress payment for property destroyed on the island.
BLENNERHASSETT, HARMAN (1765-1831), an Irish-American lawyer, was born on October 8, 1765, the son of an Irish country gentleman of English descent settled in County Kerry. He studied at Trinity College, Dublin, and was called to the Irish bar in 1790. After spending several years in Europe, he married his niece, Margaret Agnew, in 1796. She was the daughter of Robert Agnew, the lieutenant-governor of the Isle of Man. Their families disapproved of the marriage, so the couple decided to move to America, where Blennerhassett purchased an island in the Ohio River about 2 miles below Parkersburg, West Virginia, in 1798. In 1805, he hosted a visit from Aaron Burr (q.v.), and became involved in Burr's conspiracy, providing generous financial support and offering his island as a meeting place for gathering arms, supplies, and training volunteers. When the conspiracy fell apart, the Virginia militia occupied and looted the mansion and the island. Blennerhassett fled, was arrested twice, and remained imprisoned until Burr was released. The island was then abandoned, and Blennerhassett later became a cotton planter in Mississippi and a lawyer (1819-1822) in Montreal, Canada. After returning to Ireland, he died in Guernsey on February 2, 1831. His wife, who had notable literary talent and published The Deserted Isle (1822) and The Widow of the Rock and Other Poems (1824), returned to the United States in 1840 and died shortly afterward in New York City while trying to get Congress to compensate for property destroyed on the island.
See William H. Safford, Life of Harman Blennerhassett (Cincinnati, 1853); W.H. Safford (editor), The Blennerhassett Papers (Cincinnati, 1864); and “The True Story of Harman Blennerhassett,” by Therese Blennerhassett-Adams, in the Century Magazine for July 1901, vol. lxii.
See William H. Safford, Life of Harman Blennerhassett (Cincinnati, 1853); W.H. Safford (editor), The Blennerhassett Papers (Cincinnati, 1864); and “The True Story of Harman Blennerhassett,” by Therese Blennerhassett-Adams, in the Century Magazine for July 1901, vol. lxii.
BLERA (mod. Bieda), an ancient Etruscan town on the Via Clodia, about 32 m. N.N.W. of Rome. It was of little importance, and is only mentioned by geographers and in inscriptions. It is situated on a long, narrow tongue of rock at the junction of two deep glens. Some remains of the town walls still exist, and also two ancient bridges, both belonging to the Via Clodia, and many tombs hewn in the rock—small chambers imitating the architectural forms of houses, with beams and rafters represented in relief. See G. Dennis, Cities and Cemeteries of Etruria, i. 207. There was another Blera in Apulia, on the road from Venusia to Tarentum.
BLERA (mod. Bieda), an ancient Etruscan town on the Via Clodia, about 32 miles N.N.W. of Rome. It didn't hold much significance and is only mentioned by geographers and in inscriptions. It is located on a long, narrow stretch of rock at the meeting point of two deep valleys. Some remains of the town walls still stand, along with two ancient bridges, both part of the Via Clodia, and many tombs carved into the rock—small rooms that mimic the architectural styles of houses, with beams and rafters shown in relief. See G. Dennis, Cities and Cemeteries of Etruria, i. 207. There was another Blera in Apulia, on the route from Venusia to Tarentum.
BLESSINGTON, MARGUERITE, Countess of (1789-1849), Irish novelist and miscellaneous writer, daughter of Edmund Power, a small landowner, was born near Clonmel, Co. Tipperary, Ireland, on the 1st of September 1789. Her childhood was made unhappy by her father’s character and poverty,—and her early womanhood wretched by her compulsory marriage at the age of fifteen to a Captain Maurice St Leger Farmer, whose drunken habits brought him at last as a debtor to the king’s bench prison, where, in October 1817, he died. His wife had left him some time before, and in February 1818 she married Charles John Gardiner, earl of Blessington. Of rare beauty, charm and wit, she was no less distinguished for her generosity and for the extravagant tastes which she shared with her husband, which resulted in encumbering his estates with a load of debt. In the autumn of 1822 they went abroad, spent four months of the next year at Genoa in close intimacy with Byron, and remained on the continent till Lord Blessington’s death in May 1829. Some time before this they had been joined by Count D’Orsay, who in 1827 married Lady Harriet Gardiner, Lord Blessington’s only daughter by a former wife. D’Orsay, who had soon separated from his wife, now accompanied Lady Blessington to England and lived with her till her death. Their home, first at Seamore Place, and afterwards Gore House, Kensington, became a centre of attraction for whatever was distinguished in literature, learning, art, science and fashion. After her husband’s death she supplemented her diminished income by contributing to various periodicals as well as by writing novels. She was for some years editor of The Book of Beauty and The Keepsake, popular annuals of the day. In 1834 she published her Conversations with Lord Byron. Her Idler in Italy (1839-1840), and Idler in France (1841) were popular for their personal gossip and anecdote, descriptions of nature and sentiment. Early in 1849, Count D’Orsay left Gore House to escape his creditors; the furniture and decorations were sold, and Lady Blessington joined the count in Paris, where she died on the 4th of June 1849.
BLESSINGTON, MARGUERITE, Countess of (1789-1849), Irish novelist and various writer, daughter of Edmund Power, a small landowner, was born near Clonmel, Co. Tipperary, Ireland, on September 1, 1789. Her childhood was unhappy due to her father's character and their poverty, and her early adulthood was miserable because she was forced to marry Captain Maurice St Leger Farmer at the age of fifteen. His drinking habits eventually led him to the king's bench prison, where he died in October 1817. His wife had left him some time before, and in February 1818, she married Charles John Gardiner, Earl of Blessington. Known for her rare beauty, charm, and wit, she was equally noted for her generosity and extravagant tastes, which she shared with her husband, resulting in substantial debt on his estates. In the autumn of 1822, they went abroad and spent four months the following year in Genoa, closely interacting with Byron, before remaining on the continent until Lord Blessington's death in May 1829. Before this, they had been joined by Count D’Orsay, who married Lady Harriet Gardiner, Lord Blessington’s only daughter by a previous marriage, in 1827. D’Orsay, who soon separated from his wife, accompanied Lady Blessington back to England and lived with her until her death. Their home, first at Seamore Place and later at Gore House, Kensington, became a hub for distinguished figures in literature, art, science, and fashion. After her husband’s passing, she supplemented her reduced income by contributing to various magazines and writing novels. She served as editor for The Book of Beauty and The Keepsake, popular annuals at the time. In 1834, she published her Conversations with Lord Byron. Her works Idler in Italy (1839-1840) and Idler in France (1841) gained popularity for their personal gossip, anecdotes, and descriptions of nature and emotions. In early 1849, Count D'Orsay left Gore House to avoid his creditors; the furniture and decorations were sold, and Lady Blessington joined him in Paris, where she died on June 4, 1849.
Her Literary Life and Correspondence (3 vols.), edited by R.R. Madden, appeared in 1855. Her portrait was painted in 1808 by Sir Thomas Lawrence.
Her Literary Life and Correspondence (3 vols.), edited by R.R. Madden, was published in 1855. Her portrait was painted in 1808 by Sir Thomas Lawrence.
BLIDA, a town of Algeria, in the department of Algiers, 32 m. by railway S.W. from Algiers, on the line to Oran. Pop. (1906) 16,866. It lies surrounded with orchards and gardens, 630 ft. above the sea, at the base of the Little Atlas, on the southern edge of the fertile plain of the Metija, and the right bank of the Wad-el-Kebir affluent of the Chiffa. The abundant water of this stream provides power for large corn 59 mills and several factories, and also supplies the town, with its numerous fountains and irrigated gardens. Blida is surrounded by a wall of considerable extent, pierced by six gates, and is further defended by Fort Mimieh, crowning a steep hill on the left bank of the river. The present town, French in character, has well-built modern streets with many arcades, and numbers among its buildings several mosques and churches, extensive barracks and a large military hospital. The principal square, the place d’Armes, is surrounded by arcaded houses and shaded by trees. The centre of a fertile district, and a post on one of the main routes in the country, Blida has a flourishing trade, chiefly in oranges and flour. The orange groves contain over 50,000 trees, and in April the air for miles round is laden with the scent of the orange blossoms. In the public gardens is a group of magnificent olive trees. The products of the neighbouring cork trees and cedar groves are a source of revenue to the town. In the vicinity are the villages of Joinville and Montpensier, which owe their origin to military camps established by Marshal Valée in 1838; and on the road to Medea are the tombs of the marabout Mahommed-el-Kebir, who died in 1580, and his two sons.
BLIDA, is a town in Algeria, located 32 miles southwest by railway from Algiers, on the route to Oran. Population (1906) was 16,866. It's surrounded by orchards and gardens, sitting 630 feet above sea level, at the foot of the Little Atlas, on the southern edge of the fertile Metija plain, by the right bank of the Wad-el-Kebir, a tributary of the Chiffa. The plentiful water from this stream powers large corn mills and several factories, and also supplies the town, which features numerous fountains and irrigated gardens. Blida is encased by a substantial wall with six gates and is further protected by Fort Mimieh, perched on a steep hillside on the river's left bank. The current town, characterized by French influence, has well-constructed modern streets adorned with arcades, and includes several mosques and churches, extensive barracks, and a large military hospital. The main square, the place d’Armes, is surrounded by arcaded buildings and shaded by trees. As the center of a fertile region and a stop on one of the main routes through the country, Blida has a thriving trade, primarily in oranges and flour. The orange groves contain over 50,000 trees, and in April, the scent of orange blossoms fills the air for miles. The public gardens feature a cluster of magnificent olive trees. The products from the nearby cork trees and cedar groves generate revenue for the town. Nearby are the villages of Joinville and Montpensier, founded as military camps by Marshal Valée in 1838; and along the road to Medea are the tombs of the marabout Mahommed-el-Kebir, who passed away in 1580, along with his two sons.
Blida, i.e. boleida, diminutive of the Arab word belad, city, occupies the site of a military station in the time of the Romans, but the present town appears to date from the 16th century. A mosque was built by order of Khair-ed-din Barbarossa, and under the Turks the town was of some importance. In 1825 it was nearly destroyed by an earthquake, but was speedily rebuilt on a site about a mile distant from the ruins. It was not till 1838 that it was finally held by the French, though they had been in possession for a short time eight years before. In April 1906 it was chosen as the place of detention of Behanzin, the ex-king of Dahomey, who died in December of that year.
Blida, i.e. boleida, a small version of the Arabic word belad, meaning city, is located on the site of a Roman military station, but the current town seems to have originated in the 16th century. A mosque was built on the orders of Khair-ed-din Barbarossa, and under the Turks, the town held some significance. In 1825, it was almost destroyed by an earthquake but was quickly rebuilt about a mile away from the ruins. It wasn't until 1838 that the French finally took control, although they had briefly occupied it eight years earlier. In April 1906, it was designated as the detention location for Behanzin, the former king of Dahomey, who passed away in December of that year.
Blida is the chief town of a commune of the same name, having (1906) a population of 33,332.
Blida is the main town of a commune with the same name, having a population of 33,332 in 1906.
BLIGH, WILLIAM (1754-1817), English admiral, was born of a good Cornish family in 1754. He accompanied Captain Cook in his second expedition (1772-1774) as sailing-master of the “Resolution.” During the voyage, the bread-fruit, already known to Dampier, was found by them at Otaheite; and after seeing service under Lord Howe and elsewhere, “Bread-fruit Bligh,” as he was nicknamed, was despatched at the end of 1787 to the Pacific in command of H.M.S. “Bounty,” for the purpose of introducing it into the West Indies from the South Sea Islands. Bligh sailed from Otaheite, after remaining there about six months; but, when near the Friendly Islands, a mutiny (April 28, 1789) broke out on board the “Bounty,” headed by Fletcher Christian, the master’s mate, and Bligh, with eighteen others, was set adrift in the launch. The mutineers themselves settled on Pitcairn Island (q.v.), but some of them were afterwards captured, brought to England and in three cases executed. This mutiny, which forms the subject of Byron’s Island, did not arise so much from tyranny on the part of Bligh as from attachments contracted between the seamen and the women of Otaheite. After suffering severely from hunger, thirst and storms, Bligh and his companions landed at Timor in the East Indies, having performed a voyage of about 4000 m. in an open boat. Bligh returned to England in 1790, and he was soon afterwards appointed to the “Providence,” in which he effected the purpose of his former appointment by introducing the bread-fruit tree into the West India Islands. He showed great courage at the mutiny of the Nore in 1797, and in the same year took part in the battle of Camperdown, where Admiral Duncan defeated the Dutch under De Winter. In 1801 he commanded the “Glatton” (54) at the battle of Copenhagen, and received the personal commendations of Nelson. In 1805 he was appointed “captain general and governor of New South Wales.” As he made himself intensely unpopular by the harsh exercise of authority, he was deposed in January 1808 by a mutiny headed by Major George Johnston of the 102nd foot, and was imprisoned by the mutineers till 1810. He returned to England in 1811, was promoted to rear-admiral in that year, and to vice-admiral in 1814. Major Johnston was tried by court martial at Chelsea in 1811, and was dismissed the service. Bligh, who was an active, persevering and courageous officer, died in London in 1817.
BLIGH, WILLIAM (1754-1817), English admiral, was born into a respectable Cornish family in 1754. He joined Captain Cook on his second voyage (1772-1774) as the sailing master of the “Resolution.” During the journey, they discovered the breadfruit, previously known to Dampier, at Otaheite. After serving under Lord Howe and in other roles, “Bread-fruit Bligh,” as he was called, was sent at the end of 1787 to the Pacific in charge of H.M.S. “Bounty” to introduce the fruit to the West Indies from the South Sea Islands. Bligh departed from Otaheite after staying there for about six months; however, while near the Friendly Islands, a mutiny occurred on April 28, 1789, led by Fletcher Christian, the master’s mate. Bligh and eighteen others were cast adrift in the launch. The mutineers eventually settled on Pitcairn Island (q.v.), though some were later captured and brought back to England, where three of them were executed. This mutiny, which inspires Byron’s Island, wasn't primarily due to Bligh’s tyranny but stemmed from the relationships the sailors formed with the women of Otaheite. After enduring significant hardships from hunger, thirst, and storms, Bligh and his companions arrived at Timor in the East Indies, having traveled about 4000 miles in an open boat. Bligh returned to England in 1790 and was soon assigned to the “Providence,” which successfully brought the breadfruit tree to the West India Islands as intended. He displayed considerable bravery during the mutiny at the Nore in 1797 and participated in the battle of Camperdown that same year, where Admiral Duncan defeated the Dutch forces under De Winter. In 1801, he commanded the “Glatton” (54) at the battle of Copenhagen and received personal praise from Nelson. In 1805, he was appointed captain general and governor of New South Wales. However, he became extremely unpopular due to his harsh methods and was overthrown in January 1808 by a mutiny led by Major George Johnston of the 102nd foot, being imprisoned by the mutineers until 1810. He returned to England in 1811, was promoted to rear-admiral that same year, and to vice-admiral in 1814. Major Johnston faced a court martial in Chelsea in 1811, resulting in his dismissal from service. Bligh, who was a dedicated, persistent, and brave officer, passed away in London in 1817.
BLIND, MATHILDE (1841-1896), English author, was born at Mannheim on the 21st of March 1841. Her father was a banker named Cohen, but she took the name of Blind after her step-father, the political writer, Karl Blind (1826-1907), one of the exiled leaders of the Baden insurrection in 1848-1849, and an ardent supporter of the various 19th-century movements for the freedom and autonomy of struggling nationalities. The family was compelled to take refuge in England, where Mathilde devoted herself to literature and to the higher education of women. She produced also three long poems, “The Prophecy of St Oran” (1881), “The Heather on Fire” (1886), an indignant protest against the evictions in the Highlands, and “The Ascent of Man” (1888), which was to be the epic of the theory of evolution. She wrote biographies of George Eliot (1883) and Madame Roland (1886), and translated D.F. Strauss’s The Old Faith and the New (1873-1874) and the Memoirs of Marie Bashkirtseff (1890). She died on the 26th of November 1896, bequeathing her property to Newnham College, Cambridge.
BLIND, MATHILDE (1841-1896), was an English author born in Mannheim on March 21, 1841. Her father, Cohen, was a banker, but she adopted the last name Blind after her stepfather, Karl Blind (1826-1907), a political writer and one of the exiled leaders of the Baden uprising in 1848-1849, who was a passionate supporter of various 19th-century movements for the freedom and independence of struggling nations. The family had to seek refuge in England, where Mathilde committed herself to literature and to advancing women's education. She also wrote three long poems: “The Prophecy of St Oran” (1881), “The Heather on Fire” (1886), a passionate protest against the evictions in the Highlands, and “The Ascent of Man” (1888), which aimed to be the epic on the theory of evolution. She authored biographies of George Eliot (1883) and Madame Roland (1886), and translated D.F. Strauss’s The Old Faith and the New (1873-1874) and the Memoirs of Marie Bashkirtseff (1890). She passed away on November 26, 1896, leaving her estate to Newnham College, Cambridge.
A complete edition of her poems was edited by Mr Arthur Symons in 1900, with a biographical introduction by Dr Richard Garnett.
A complete edition of her poems was edited by Mr. Arthur Symons in 1900, with a biographical introduction by Dr. Richard Garnett.
BLIND HOOKEY, a game of chance, played with a full pack of cards. The deal, which is an advantage, is decided as at whist, the cards being shuffled and cut as at whist. The dealer gives a parcel of cards to each player including himself. Each player puts the amount of his stake on his cards, which he must not look at. The dealer has to take all bets. He then turns up his parcel, exposing the bottom card. Each player in turn does the same, winning or losing according as his cards are higher or lower than the dealer’s. Ties pay the dealer. The cards rank as at whist. The suits are of no importance, the cards taking precedence according to their face-value.
BLIND HOCKEY, is a game of chance played with a standard deck of cards. The dealer, who has an advantage, is decided just like in whist, with the cards being shuffled and cut in the same way. The dealer gives a set of cards to each player, including themselves. Each player places their stake on their cards without looking at them. The dealer has to accept all bets. Then, the dealer reveals the bottom card of their set. Each player, in turn, does the same, winning or losing based on whether their cards are higher or lower than the dealer's. Ties go to the dealer. The cards are ranked as they are in whist, and suits don’t matter; the precedence is based solely on the face value of the cards.
BLINDING, a form of punishment anciently common in many lands, being inflicted on thieves, adulterers, perjurers and other criminals. The inhabitants of Apollonia (Illyria) are said to have inflicted this penalty on their “watch” when found asleep at their posts. It was resorted to by the Roman emperors in their persecutions of the Christians. The method of destroying the sight varied. Sometimes a mixture of lime and vinegar, or barely scalding vinegar alone, was poured into the eyes. Sometimes a rope was twisted round the victim’s head till the eyes started out of their sockets. In the middle ages the punishment seems to have been changed from total blindness to a permanent injury to the eyes, amounting, however, almost to blindness, produced by holding a red-hot iron dish or basin before the face. Under the forest laws of the Norman kings of England blinding was a common penalty. Shakespeare makes King John order his nephew Arthur’s eyes to be burnt out.
BLINDING, was a common form of punishment in many ancient societies, used against thieves, adulterers, perjurers, and other criminals. The people of Apollonia (Illyria) were said to punish their "watch" for sleeping on the job by inflicting this penalty. Roman emperors employed it during their persecution of Christians. The methods for blinding varied. Sometimes, a mixture of lime and vinegar, or just scalding vinegar, was poured into the eyes. Other times, a rope was twisted around the victim's head until their eyes popped out. In the Middle Ages, the punishment changed from complete blindness to permanent eye damage that was nearly blind, often caused by holding a red-hot iron dish or basin in front of the face. Blinding was also a common penalty under the forest laws of the Norman kings in England. Shakespeare has King John order the burning out of his nephew Arthur’s eyes.
BLINDNESS, the condition of being blind (a common Teutonic word), i.e. devoid of sight (see also Vision; and Eye: Diseases). The data furnished in various countries by the census of 1901 showed generally a decrease in blindness, due to the progress in medical science, use of antiseptics, better sanitation, control of infectious diseases, and better protection in shops and factories. Blindness is much more common in hot countries than in temperate and cold regions, but Finland and Iceland are exceptions to the general rule.1 In hot countries the eyes are affected by the glaring sunlight, the dust and the dryness of the air. From statistics in Italy, France and Belgium, localities on the coast seem to have more blind persons than those at a distance from the sea.
BLINDNESS, the state of being without sight (a common Teutonic term), i.e. lacking vision (see also Vision; and Eye: Diseases). The data collected from various countries by the 1901 census generally showed a decline in blindness, thanks to advancements in medical science, the use of antiseptics, improved sanitation, better control of infectious diseases, and increased safety measures in shops and factories. Blindness is much more frequent in warm countries than in temperate and colder regions, though Finland and Iceland are exceptions to this trend.1 In warm countries, the eyes are impacted by bright sunlight, dust, and dry air. Statistics from Italy, France, and Belgium indicate that coastal areas tend to have higher numbers of blind individuals compared to those further from the sea.
The following table gives the number of blind persons as reported in the census of each country. Unless otherwise stated, it refers to the statistics of 1900.
The following table shows the number of blind individuals as reported in the census of each country. Unless stated otherwise, it refers to the statistics from 1900.
Country. | Total Number. | Number per Million of Population. |
Austria | 14,582 | 540 |
Belgium | 3448 | 487 |
Canada | 3279 | 610 |
Denmark | 1047 | 427 |
England | 25,317 | 778 |
France | 27,174 | 698 |
Finland2 | 3229 | 1191 |
Germany | 34,334 | 609 |
Hungary | 19,377 | 1006 |
Ireland | 4263 | 954 |
Italy | 38,160 | 1175 |
Holland (1890) | 2114 | 414 |
Norway | 1879 | 838 |
Portugal | 5650 | 1040 |
Sweden | 3413 | 664 |
Switzerland (1895) | 2107 | 722 |
Scotland | 3253 | 727 |
Spain (1877) | 24,608 | 1006 |
Russia | · · | about 2000 |
United States (corrected census) | 85,662 | 1125 |
Causes and Prevention
Causes and Prevention
There are many cases of complete or partial blindness which might have been prevented, and a knowledge of the best methods of prevention and cure should be spread as widely as possible. Magnus, Bremer, Steffen and Rössler are of opinion that 40% of the cases of blindness might have been prevented. Hayes gives 33.35% as positively avoidable, 38.75% possibly avoidable, and 46.27% as a conservative estimate. Cohn regards blindness as certainly preventable in 33%, as probably preventable in 43%, and as quite unpreventable in only 24%. If we take the lowest of these figures, and assume that 400 out of every 1000 blind persons might have been saved from such a calamity, we realize the importance of preventative measures. For the physiology and pathology of the eye generally, see Vision and Eye.
There are many instances of complete or partial blindness that could have been prevented, and knowledge of the best ways to prevent and treat it should be shared as widely as possible. Magnus, Bremer, Steffen, and Rössler believe that 40% of blindness cases could have been avoided. Hayes states that 33.35% are definitely avoidable, 38.75% might be avoidable, and 46.27% is a conservative estimate. Cohn views blindness as certainly preventable in 33% of cases, probably preventable in 43%, and considers only 24% as truly unpreventable. If we take the lowest of these figures and assume that 400 out of every 1000 blind individuals could have avoided this misfortune, we understand the importance of preventive measures. For more on the physiology and pathology of the eye, see Vision and Eye.
The great majority of these cases are due to infantile purulent ophthalmia. This arises from inoculation of the eyes with hurtful material at time of birth. If the contagious discharges are allowed to remain, violent inflammation Ophthalmia. is set up which usually ends in the loss of sight. It depends on the presence of a microbe, and the effective application of a weak solution of nitrate of silver is curative, if made in a proper manner at an early period of the case. In Germany, midwives are expressly prohibited by law from treating any affection of the eyes or eyelids of infants, however slight. On the appearance of the first symptoms, they are required to represent to the parents, or others in charge, that medical assistance is urgently needed, or, if necessary, they are themselves to report to the local authorities and the district doctor. Neglect of these regulations entails liability to punishment. Eleven of the United States of America have enacted laws requiring that, if one or both eyes of an infant should become inflamed, swollen or reddened at any time within two weeks of its birth, it shall be the duty of the midwife or nurse having charge of such infant to report in writing within six hours, to the health officer or some legally qualified physician, the fact that such inflammation, swelling or redness exists. The penalty for failure to comply is fine or imprisonment.
Most of these cases are due to infant eye infections. This happens when harmful materials infect the eyes at birth. If the contagious discharge isn't cleaned up, it can cause severe inflammation that usually leads to blindness. It’s caused by the presence of a microbe, and using a weak solution of silver nitrate can cure it, but it needs to be done properly and early on. In Germany, midwives are legally forbidden from treating any eye or eyelid issues in infants, no matter how minor. When the first symptoms appear, they must inform the parents or guardians that medical help is urgently needed, or if necessary, they must report to local authorities and the district doctor themselves. Ignoring these rules can result in punishment. Eleven U.S. states have laws stating that if an infant's eyes become inflamed, swollen, or red within two weeks of birth, the midwife or nurse must report this in writing to a health officer or qualified physician within six hours. The penalty for failing to do so can be a fine or imprisonment.
The following weighty words, from a paper prepared by Dr Park Lewis, of Buffalo, N.Y., for the American Medical Association, show that laws are not sufficient to prevent evil, unless supported by strong public sentiment:—
The following important words, from a paper written by Dr. Park Lewis, of Buffalo, N.Y., for the American Medical Association, illustrate that laws alone aren't enough to stop wrongdoing unless backed by strong public opinion:—
“When an enlightened, civilized and progressive nation quietly and passively, year after year, permits a multitude of its people unnecessarily to become blind, and more especially when one-quarter of these are infants, the reason for such a startling condition of affairs demands explanation. That such is the fact, practically all reliable ophthalmologists agree.
“When a well-informed, civilized, and progressive nation quietly and passively allows many of its people to suffer from unnecessary blindness year after year, especially when one-quarter of those affected are infants, the reason for this alarming situation needs to be addressed. Almost all reputable eye doctors agree that this is indeed the case.”
“From a summary of carefully tabulated statistics it has been demonstrated that at least four-tenths of all existing blindness might have been avoided had proper preventative or curative measures been employed, while one-quarter of this, or one-tenth of the whole, is due to ophthalmia neonatorum, an infectious, preventable and almost absolutely curable disease. Perhaps this statement will take on a new meaning when it is added that there are in the state of New York alone more than 6000, and in the United States more than 50,000 blind people; of these 600 in the one state, and 5000 in the country, would have been saved from lives of darkness and unhappiness, in having lost all the joys that come through sight, and of more or less complete dependence—for no individual can be as self-sufficient without as with eyes—if a simple, safe and easily applied precautionary measure had been taken at the right time and in the right way to prevent this affliction. The following three vital facts are not questioned, but are universally accepted by those qualified to know:—
“From a summary of carefully collected statistics, it has been shown that at least 40% of all existing blindness could have been prevented if proper preventive or curative measures had been used. Additionally, a quarter of this—10% of the total—is due to ophthalmia neonatorum, an infectious, preventable, and nearly completely curable disease. This statement gains further significance when we note that in the state of New York alone, there are more than 6,000 blind individuals, while over 50,000 exist across the United States. Of these, 600 in the state and 5,000 in the country could have been spared a life of darkness and unhappiness, losing all the joys that come with sight, and facing varying degrees of dependence—since no one can be as self-sufficient without vision as with it—if a simple, safe, and easily implementable precaution had been taken at the right time and in the right way to prevent this condition. The following three crucial facts are not disputed and are universally acknowledged by those qualified to understand:—”
“1. The ophthalmia of infancy is an infectious germ disease.
“1. The eye infection in infants is a contagious germ disease.
“2. By the instillation of a silver salt in the eyes of a new-born infant the disease is prevented from developing in all but an exceedingly small number of the cases in which it would otherwise have appeared.
“2. By putting a silver salt in the eyes of a newborn baby, the disease is prevented from developing in almost all cases where it would have otherwise appeared.”
“3. In practically all those few exceptional cases the disease is absolutely curable, if like treatment is employed at a sufficiently early period.
“3. In almost all of those rare exceptional cases, the disease is completely curable if the right treatment is applied early enough.”
“Since these facts are no longer subjects of discussion, but are universally accepted by all educated medical men, the natural inquiry follows: Why, as a common-sense proposition, are not these simple, harmless, preventive measures invariably employed, and why, in consequence of this neglect, does a nation sit quietly and indifferently by, making no attempt to prevent this enormous and needless waste of human eyes?
“Since these facts are no longer subjects of discussion and are universally accepted by all educated medical professionals, a logical question arises: Why, as a matter of common sense, aren’t these simple, harmless preventive measures consistently used? And why, because of this neglect, does a nation sit idly by, making no effort to prevent this huge and unnecessary loss of human sight?”
“The reasons are three-fold, and lie—first, with the medical profession; second, with the lay public; third, with the state.
“The reasons are threefold and stem—first, from the medical profession; second, from the general public; third, from the government.
“For the education of its blind children annually New York alone pays per capita at least $350, and a yearly gross sum amounting to much more than $100,000. If, as sometimes happens, the blind citizen is a dependent throughout a long life, the cost of maintenance is not less than $10,000, and the mere cost in money will be multiplied many times in that a productive factor, by reason of blindness, has been removed from the community.
“For the education of its blind children, New York alone spends at least $350 per child each year, totaling well over $100,000 annually. If, as is sometimes the case, a blind person is dependent for most of their life, the cost of their care is no less than $10,000, and the financial impact will be multiplied many times since a productive member of the community has been lost due to blindness.”
“If, therefore, as an economic proposition, it were realized how vitally it concerns the state that not one child shall needlessly become blind, thereby increasing the public financial burden, there is no doubt that early and effective measures would be instituted to protect the state from this unnecessary and extravagant expenditure of public funds.
“If it were understood, from an economic standpoint, how critically important it is for the state that no child should needlessly go blind—thus adding to the public financial burden—then there is no doubt that prompt and effective measures would be put in place to protect the state from this unnecessary and excessive spending of public funds.”
“Eleven states have passed legislative enactments requiring that the midwife shall report each case to the proper health authority, and affixing a penalty for the failure to do so. As has been intimated, however, it is not by any means always under the ministration of midwives that these cases occur, and, like all laws behind which is not a strong and well-informed public sentiment, this law is rarely enforced. A more effective method must be devised. Every physician having to do with the parturient woman, every obstetrician, every midwife, must be frequently and constantly advised of the dangers and possibilities of this disease, the necessity of prevention, and the value of early and correct treatment. They must then have placed in their hands, ready for instant use, a safe and efficient preparation, issued by the health authorities as a guarantee as to its quality and efficiency.
“Eleven states have enacted laws requiring midwives to report each case to the appropriate health authority, and there are penalties for not doing so. However, as mentioned, these cases don’t only happen under the care of midwives, and like all laws without strong public support, this one is rarely enforced. We need a more effective approach. Every doctor dealing with pregnant women, every obstetrician, every midwife, must be regularly informed about the dangers and possibilities of this disease, the importance of prevention, and the benefits of early and proper treatment. They must also have a safe and effective preparation, provided by health authorities as a guarantee of its quality and effectiveness, ready for immediate use."
“An important step was taken in this direction when a resolution was passed by the House of Delegates at the annual meeting of the New York State Medical Society, requesting the various health officers of the state to include ophthalmia neonatorum among contagious diseases which must be reported to the local boards of health.
An important step was taken in this direction when the House of Delegates passed a resolution at the annual meeting of the New York State Medical Society, asking the state's health officers to classify ophthalmia neonatorum as a contagious disease that must be reported to local boards of health.
“The second essential, in order that the cause of infantile ophthalmia be abolished, is that a solution of the necessary silver salt be prepared under the authority of somebody capable of inspiring universal confidence, and that it be distributed by the health department of every state gratuitously to every obstetrician, physician or midwife qualified to care for the parturient woman. The nature of the solution, together with the character of the descriptive card which should accompany it, should be determined by a committee, chosen by the president of the American Medical Association, which should have among its members at least one representative ophthalmologist, one obstetrician and one sanitarian. The conclusions of this committee should be reported back to the House of Delegates, so that the preparation and its text should carry with it, on the great authority of this association, the assurance that the solution is entirely safe and necessary, and that its use should invariably be part of the toilet of every new-born child. The solution, probably silver nitrate, could be put up either by the state itself or by some trustworthy pharmacist, at an insignificant cost; its purity and sterility should be vouched for by the board of health of the state. It should be enclosed in specially prepared receptacles, 61 each containing a special quantity, and so arranged that it may be used drop by drop. These, properly enclosed, accompanied by a brief lucid explanation of the danger of the disease, the necessity of this germicide, the method of its employment, and the right subsequent care of the eyes, should be sent to the obstetrician on the receipt of each birth certificate.
“The second essential to eliminate the cause of infantile ophthalmia is to prepare a solution of the required silver salt under the authority of someone who can inspire widespread confidence, and to distribute it for free through the health department of every state to all qualified obstetricians, physicians, or midwives caring for new mothers. The specifics of the solution and the accompanying description card should be determined by a committee appointed by the president of the American Medical Association, which must include at least one representative ophthalmologist, one obstetrician, and one sanitarian. The committee’s findings should be reported back to the House of Delegates, ensuring that the preparation and its description carry the strong authority of this association, guaranteeing that the solution is completely safe and necessary, and that its use should always be part of the care routine for every newborn. The solution, likely silver nitrate, could be produced by the state or a reliable pharmacist at a minimal cost; its purity and sterility should be certified by the state board of health. It should be packaged in specially designed containers, 61 each containing a specific quantity and designed for drop-by-drop use. These should be properly sealed and accompanied by a clear, concise explanation of the disease's dangers, the need for this germicide, the method for using it, and the appropriate follow-up care for the eyes, and sent to the obstetrician upon receipt of each birth certificate.”
“I have said that responsibility for the indifference that is annually resulting in such frightful disaster lies primarily with the state, the public and the medical profession.
“I've stated that the responsibility for the indifference that leads to such terrible disasters every year falls mainly on the state, the public, and the medical profession."
“The state is already aroused to the necessity of taking effective measures to wipe out this controllable plague. Bills have been introduced in the legislature of Massachusetts and of New York, providing for the appointment of commissions for the blind, one of whose duties will be to study the causes of unnecessary blindness and to suggest preventative measures.”
“The state is already aware of the need to take effective steps to eliminate this manageable epidemic. Bills have been introduced in the legislatures of Massachusetts and New York to create commissions for the blind, one of whose responsibilities will be to investigate the causes of avoidable blindness and to recommend preventative measures.”
One of the most common diseases of the eye is trachoma, often called “granular lids,” because the inner surface of the lid seems to be covered with little granulations. The disease sometimes lasts for years without causing Trachoma. blindness, though it gives rise to great irritation. It is generally attended by a discharge, which is highly contagious, producing the same disease if it gets into other eyes. Want of cleanliness is one of the most important factors in the propagation of trachoma, hence its great prevalence in Oriental countries. Trachoma is very prevalent in Egypt, where those suffering from total or partial blindness are said to amount to 10% of the population. During Napoleon’s Egyptian campaign, nearly every soldier, out of an army of 32,000 men, was affected. During the following twenty years the disease spread through almost all European armies. In the Belgian army, there was one trachomatous soldier out of every five, and up to 1834 no less than 4000 soldiers had lost both eyes and 10,000 one eye. It is a disease which is very common in workhouse schools, orphan asylums and similar establishments. Unlike ophthalmia of new-born children, it is difficult to cure, and a total separation of the diseased from the healthy children should be effected.
One of the most common eye diseases is trachoma, often called “granular lids” because the inner surface of the eyelid looks like it's covered with tiny granulations. The disease can last for years without causing blindness, though it causes significant irritation. It usually comes with a discharge that is highly contagious, spreading the same disease if it gets into other people's eyes. Poor hygiene is one of the main factors in spreading trachoma, which is why it's so widespread in Eastern countries. Trachoma is very common in Egypt, where it's estimated that 10% of the population suffers from total or partial blindness. During Napoleon’s campaign in Egypt, nearly every soldier in his army of 32,000 was affected. Over the next twenty years, the disease spread through almost all of the European armies. In the Belgian army, one in every five soldiers had trachoma, and by 1834, at least 4,000 soldiers had lost both eyes and 10,000 had lost one eye. This disease is very common in workhouse schools, orphanages, and similar institutions. Unlike ophthalmia in newborns, it's hard to treat, and a complete separation of infected and healthy children should be enforced.
About one-half of those who are blinded by injuries lose the second eye by sympathetic ophthalmia. It is a constant source of danger to those who retain an eye blinded by Sympathetic inflammation. injury. Blindness from this cause can be prevented by the removal of the injured eye, but unfortunately the proposal often meets with opposition from the patient.
About half of the people who lose their sight due to injuries end up losing the second eye because of sympathetic ophthalmia. This condition is a constant threat to those who still have one good eye affected by an injury. Blindness caused by this can be prevented by removing the injured eye, but unfortunately, this suggestion often faces resistance from the patient.
Glaucoma is a disease which almost invariably leads to total Glaucoma. blindness; but in most cases it can be arrested by a simple operation if the case is seen sufficiently early.
Glaucoma is a disease that almost always results in complete Glaucoma. blindness; however, in most cases, it can be stopped through a straightforward procedure if identified early enough.
Myopia, or “short-sight,” makes itself apparent in children between the ages of seven and nine. Neglect of a year or two may do serious mischief. Short-sight, when not inherited, is produced by looking intently and continuously Short-sight. at near objects. Children should be encouraged to describe objects at a distance, with which they are unacquainted, and parents should choose out-door occupations and amusements for children who show a tendency to shortsightedness.
Myopia, or “short-sight,” often shows up in children between the ages of seven and nine. Ignoring it for a year or two can cause serious problems. When not inherited, short-sight develops from looking closely and constantly at nearby objects. Children should be encouraged to describe objects in the distance that they aren’t familiar with, and parents should select outdoor activities and hobbies for kids who show signs of short-sightedness.
A report was issued in 1906, by the school board of Glasgow, as to an investigation by Dr H. Wright Thomas, ophthalmic surgeon, regarding the eyesight of school children, which includes the following passage. Dr Wright Thomas states that the teachers tested the visual acuteness of 52,493 children, and found 18,565, or 35%, to be below what is regarded as the normal standard. He examined the 18,565 defectives by retinoscopy, and found that 11,209, or 21% of the whole, had ocular defects. The proportion of these cases was highest in the poor and closely-built districts and in old schools, and was lowest in the better-class schools and those near the outskirts of the city. Defective vision, apart from ocular defect, seems to be due partly to want of training of the eyes for distant objects and partly to exhaustion of the eyes, which is easily induced when work is carried on in bad light, or the nutrition of the children is defective from bad feeding and unhealthy surroundings. Regarding training of the eyes for distant objects, much might be done in the infant department by the total abolition of sewing, which is definitely hurtful to such young eyes, and the substitution of competitive games involving the recognition of small objects at a distance of 20 ft. or more. An annual testing by the teachers, followed by medical inspection of the children found defective, would soon cause all existing defects to be corrected, and would lead to the detection of those which develop during school life.
A report was released in 1906 by the Glasgow school board regarding an investigation by Dr. H. Wright Thomas, an eye surgeon, about schoolchildren's eyesight, which includes the following passage. Dr. Wright Thomas mentions that the teachers assessed the visual sharpness of 52,493 children and found that 18,565, or 35%, fell below the normal standard. He examined the 18,565 students with retinoscopy and discovered that 11,209, or 21% of the total, had eye defects. The rate of these cases was highest in poorer, densely populated areas and in older schools, while it was lowest in higher-class schools and those located on the outskirts of the city. Defective vision, apart from actual eye defects, appears to stem partly from a lack of training for viewing distant objects and partly from eye strain, which can easily occur when work is done in poor lighting or if the children are poorly nourished due to inadequate diet and unhealthy surroundings. To improve training for distance vision, a lot could be accomplished in the early years by completely eliminating sewing, which is harmful to young eyes, and replacing it with competitive games that involve recognizing small objects from a distance of 20 feet or more. Regular testing by teachers, followed by a medical check-up for any identified issues, would quickly address existing problems and help identify those that arise during school years.
History of Institutions
Institutional History
Although there is a record of a hospital established by St Basil at Caesarea, Cappadocia, in the 4th century, a refuge by the hermit St Lymnee (d. c. 455) at Syr, Syria, in the 5th century, and an institution by St Bertrand, bishop of Le Mans, in the 7th century, the first public effort to benefit the blind was the founding of a hospital at Paris, in 1260, by Louis IX., for 300 blind persons. The common legend is that he founded it as an asylum for 300 of his soldiers who had become blinded in the crusade in Egypt, but the statutes of the founder are preserved, and no mention is made of crusaders. This Hospice des Quinze-Vingts, increased by subsequent additions to its funds, still assists the adult blind of France. The pensioners are divided into two classes—those who are inmates of the hospital (300), and those who receive pensions in the form of out-door relief. All appointments to inmates or pensions are vested in the minister of the Interior, and applicants must be of French nationality, totally blind and not less than forty years of age.
Although there is a record of a hospital established by St. Basil at Caesarea, Cappadocia, in the 4th century, a refuge by the hermit St. Lymnee (d. c. 455) at Syr, Syria, in the 5th century, and an institution by St. Bertrand, bishop of Le Mans, in the 7th century, the first public effort to assist the blind was the founding of a hospital in Paris in 1260 by Louis IX. for 300 blind individuals. The common legend says he created it as a refuge for 300 of his soldiers who had been blinded during the crusade in Egypt, but the founder's statutes are preserved, and there is no mention of crusaders. This Hospice des Quinze-Vingts, which has grown with additional funding over the years, still supports the adult blind in France. The residents are divided into two groups—those who live in the hospital (300) and those who receive pensions as outdoor relief. All appointments for residents or pensions are managed by the Minister of the Interior, and applicants must be of French nationality, completely blind, and at least forty years old.
From the time of St Louis to the 18th century, there are records of isolated cases of blind persons who were educated, and of efforts to devise tangible apparatus to assist them.
From the time of St. Louis to the 18th century, there are records of a few blind individuals who were educated, as well as attempts to create useful devices to help them.
Girolamo Cardan, the 16th-century Italian physician, conceived the idea that the blind could be taught to read and write by means of touch. About 1517 Francesco Lucas in Spain, and Rampazetto in Italy, made use of large letters cut in wood for instructing the blind. In 1646 a book, on the condition of the blind, was written by an Italian, and published in Italian and French, under the title of L’Aveugle affligé et consolé. In 1670 a book was written on the instruction of the blind by Lana Terzi, the Jesuit. In 1676 Jacques Bernoulli, the Swiss savant, taught a blind girl to read, but the means of her instruction were not made known. In 1749 D. Diderot wrote his Lettre sur les aveugles à l’usage de ceux qui voient, to show how far the intellectual and moral nature of man is modified by blindness. Dr S.G. Howe, who many years after translated and printed the “Letter” in embossed type, characterizes it as abounding with errors of fact and inference, but also with beauties and suggestions. The heterodox speculations contained in his “Letter on the Blind” caused Diderot to be imprisoned three months in the Bastille. He was released because his services were required for the forthcoming Encyclopaedia. Rousseau visited Diderot in prison, and is reported to have suggested a system of embossed printing. J. Locke, G.W. Leibnitz, Molineau and others discussed the effect of blindness on the human mind. In Germany, Weissembourg had used signs in relief and taught Mlle Paradis.
Girolamo Cardan, the 16th-century Italian physician, came up with the idea that blind people could be taught to read and write by touch. Around 1517, Francesco Lucas in Spain and Rampazetto in Italy used large wooden letters to teach the blind. In 1646, an Italian published a book about the condition of blind people in both Italian and French, titled L’Aveugle affligé et consolé. In 1670, Lana Terzi, a Jesuit, wrote a book on teaching the blind. In 1676, Jacques Bernoulli, a Swiss scholar, taught a blind girl to read, but the methods he used were not revealed. In 1749, D. Diderot wrote Lettre sur les aveugles à l’usage de ceux qui voient to demonstrate how blindness affects human intellectual and moral nature. Dr. S.G. Howe later translated and printed the “Letter” in embossed type and described it as full of factual and inferential errors, but also rich in insights and admirable points. The controversial ideas in his “Letter on the Blind” led to Diderot being imprisoned for three months in the Bastille. He was released because his help was needed for the upcoming Encyclopaedia. Rousseau visited Diderot in jail and is said to have suggested a system of embossed printing. J. Locke, G.W. Leibnitz, Molineau, and others discussed how blindness affects the human mind. In Germany, Weissembourg used raised signs to teach Mlle Paradis.
Prior to the 18th century, blind beggars existed in such numbers that they struggled for standing room in positions favourable for asking alms. Their very affliction led to their being used as spectacles for the amusement of the populace. The degraded state of the masses of the blind in France attracted the attention of Valentin Haüy. In 1771, at the annual fair of St Ovid, in Paris, an innkeeper had a group of blind men attired in a ridiculous manner, decorated with peacock tails, asses’ ears, and pasteboard spectacles without glasses, in which condition they gave a burlesque concert, for the profit of their employer. This sad scene was repeated day after day, and greeted with loud laughter by the gaping crowds. Among those who gazed at this outrage to humanity was the philanthropist Valentin Haüy, who left the disgraceful scene full of sorrow. “Yes,” he said to himself, “I will substitute truth for this mocking parody. I will make the blind to read, and they shall be enabled to execute harmonious music.” Haüy collected all the information he could gain respecting the blind, and began teaching a blind boy who had gained his living by begging at a church 62 door. Encouraged by the success of his pupil, Haüy collected other blind persons, and in 1785 founded in Paris the first school for the blind (the Institution Nationale des Jeunes Aveugles), and commenced the first printing in raised characters. In 1786, before Louis XVI. and his court at Versailles, he exhibited the attainments of his pupils in reading, writing, arithmetic, geography and music, and in the same year published an account of his methods, entitled Essai sur l’education des aveugles. As the novelty wore off, contributions almost came to an end, and the Blind School must have ceased to exist, had it not been taken, in 1791, under the protection of the state.
Before the 18th century, there were so many blind beggars that they had to compete for space to ask for money. Their condition led to them being treated as entertainment for the public. The miserable lives of the blind in France caught the attention of Valentin Haüy. In 1771, at the annual St Ovid fair in Paris, an innkeeper had a group of blind men dressed in ridiculous outfits, sporting peacock feathers, donkey ears, and cardboard glasses without lenses, performing a comedic concert for the benefit of their employer. This sad spectacle happened every day and was met with loud laughter from the onlookers. Among the crowd watching this disgrace was the philanthropist Valentin Haüy, who left feeling deeply troubled. “Yes,” he thought, “I will replace this mockery with something real. I will teach the blind to read and enable them to make beautiful music.” Haüy gathered all the information he could find about the blind and began teaching a blind boy who had been begging near a church door. Encouraged by his pupil's progress, Haüy recruited more blind individuals and in 1785 established the first school for the blind in Paris (the Institution Nationale des Jeunes Aveugles) and began the first printing in raised characters. In 1786, before Louis XVI and his court at Versailles, he showcased his students' skills in reading, writing, math, geography, and music. That same year, he published a description of his teaching methods titled Essai sur l’education des aveugles. As interest faded, donations nearly dried up, and the Blind School would have closed down if it hadn't been taken under state protection in 1791.
The emperor of Russia, and later the dowager empress, having learned of Haüy’s work, invited him to visit St Petersburg for the purpose of establishing a similar institution in the Russian capital. On his journey Haüy was invited by the king of Prussia to Charlottenburg. He took part in the deliberations of the Academy of Sciences in Berlin, and as a result a school was founded there.
The emperor of Russia, and later the dowager empress, learned about Haüy’s work and invited him to visit St Petersburg to set up a similar institution in the Russian capital. During his trip, Haüy was invited by the king of Prussia to Charlottenburg. He participated in the discussions at the Academy of Sciences in Berlin, which led to the founding of a school there.
Edward Rushton, a blind man, was the projector of the first institution for the blind in England—the School for the Indigent Blind, Liverpool. In 1790 Rushton suggested to the literary and philosophical society of which he was a member, the establishment of a benefit club for the indigent blind. The idea was communicated to his friend, J. Christie, a blind musician, and the latter thought the scheme should also include the instruction of young blind persons. They circulated letters amongst individuals who would be likely to give their assistance, and the Rev. Henry Dannett warmly advocated the undertaking. It was mainly due to his co-operation and zeal that Messrs Rushton and Christie’s plan was carried out, and the Liverpool asylum was opened in 1791. Thomas Blacklock of Edinburgh, a blind poet and scholar, translated Haüy’s work on the Education of the Blind. He interested Mr David Millar, a blind gentleman, the Rev. David Johnston and others in the subject, and after Blacklock’s death the Edinburgh Asylum for the Relief of the Indigent and Industrious Blind was established (1793). Institutions were established in the United Kingdom in the following order:—
Edward Rushton, a blind man, was the founder of the first institution for the blind in England—the School for the Indigent Blind, Liverpool. In 1790, Rushton proposed to the literary and philosophical society he was part of the creation of a support club for the indigent blind. He shared the idea with his friend, J. Christie, a blind musician, who believed the initiative should also include education for young blind people. They sent out letters to individuals likely to offer their support, and the Rev. Henry Dannett strongly backed the project. It was largely thanks to his cooperation and enthusiasm that Rushton and Christie’s plan was realized, leading to the opening of the Liverpool asylum in 1791. Thomas Blacklock of Edinburgh, a blind poet and scholar, translated Haüy’s work on the Education of the Blind. He engaged Mr. David Millar, a blind gentleman, the Rev. David Johnston, and others in the cause, and after Blacklock’s passing, the Edinburgh Asylum for the Relief of the Indigent and Industrious Blind was established (1793). Institutions were created in the United Kingdom in the following order:—
School for the Indigent Blind, Liverpool | 1791 |
Royal Blind Asylum, Edinburgh | 1793 |
Bristol Asylum | 1793 |
School for the Indigent Blind Southwark (now removed to Leatherhead) | 1799 |
Norwich Asylum and School | 1805 |
Richmond Asylum, Dublin | 1810 |
Aberdeen Asylum | 1812 |
Molyneux Asylum, Dublin | 1815 |
Glasgow Asylum and School | 1827 |
Belfast School | 1831 |
Wilberforce School, York | 1833 |
Limerick Asylum | 1834 |
London Society for Teaching the Blind to Read, St John’s Wood, N. | 1838 |
Royal Victoria School for the Blind, Newcastle-on-Tyne | 1838 |
West of England Institute for the Blind, Exeter | 1838 |
Henshaw’s Blind Asylum, Manchester | 1839 |
County and City of Cork Asylum | 1840 |
Catholic Asylum, Liverpool | 1841 |
Brighton Asylum | 1842 |
Midland Institute for the Blind, Nottingham | 1843 |
General Institute for the Blind, Birmingham | 1848 |
Macan Asylum, Armagh | 1854 |
St Joseph’s Asylum, Dublin | 1858 |
St Mary’s Asylum, Dublin | 1858 |
Institute for the Blind, Devonport | 1860 |
South Devon and Cornwall Institute for the Blind, Plymouth | 1860 |
School for the Blind, Southsea | 1864 |
Institute for the Blind, Dundee | 1865 |
South Wales Institute for the Blind, Swansea | 1865 |
School for the Blind, Leeds | 1866 |
College for the Sons of Gentlemen, Worcester | 1866 |
Northern Counties Institute for the Blind, Inverness | 1866 |
Royal Normal College and Academy of Music for the Blind, Upper Norwood | 1872 |
School for the Blind, Sheffield | 1879 |
Barclay Home and School for Blind Girls, Brighton | 1893 |
Homes for Blind Children, Preston | 1895 |
North Stafford School, Stoke-on-Trent | 1897 |
Many of the early institutions were asylums, and to the present day schools for the blind are regarded by the public as asylums rather than as educational establishments. With nearly all these schools workshops were connected. In 1856 Miss Gilbert, the blind daughter of the bishop of Chichester, established a workshop in Berners Street, London, and since that date workshops have been started in many of the provincial towns.
Many of the early institutions were asylums, and to this day, schools for the blind are seen by the public more as asylums than as educational places. Almost all of these schools had workshops attached. In 1856, Miss Gilbert, the blind daughter of the bishop of Chichester, set up a workshop in Berners Street, London, and since then, workshops have been established in many of the smaller towns.
After the beginning of the 19th century, institutions for the blind were established in various parts of Europe. The institution at Vienna was founded in 1804 by Dr W. Klein, a blind man, and he remained at its head for fifty years. That of Berlin was established in 1806, Amsterdam, Prague and Dresden in 1808, Copenhagen in 1811. There are more than 150 on the European continent, most of them receiving aid from the government, and being under government supervision.
After the start of the 19th century, schools for the blind were set up in different parts of Europe. The one in Vienna was founded in 1804 by Dr. W. Klein, a blind man, who led it for fifty years. The Berlin institution opened in 1806, followed by Amsterdam, Prague, and Dresden in 1808, and Copenhagen in 1811. There are over 150 such institutions on the European continent, most of which receive government support and are under government oversight.
The first school for the blind in the United States was founded in Boston, Mass., chiefly through the efforts of Dr John D. Fisher, a young physician who visited the French school. It was incorporated in 1829, and in honour of T.H. Perkins (1764-1854) who gave his mansion to the institution was named the Perkins Institution and Massachusetts Asylum (now School) for the Blind. Aid was granted by the state from the beginning. In 1831 Dr Samuel G. Howe (q.v.) was appointed director, and held that position for nearly forty-four years; being succeeded by his son-in-law Michael Anagnos (d. 1906), who established a kindergarten for the blind at Jamaica Plain, in connexion with the Perkins Institution. Dr Howe was interested in many charitable and sociological movements, but his life-work was on behalf of the blind. One of his most notable achievements was the education of Laura Bridgman (q.v.) who was deaf, dumb and blind, and this has since led to the education of Helen Keller and other blind deaf-mutes. The New York Institution was incorporated in 1831, and the Pennsylvania Institution was founded at Philadelphia by the Society of Friends in 1833. The Ohio was founded at Columbus in 1837, Virginia at Staunton in 1839, Kentucky at Louisville in 1842, Tennessee at Nashville in 1844, and now every state in the Union makes provision for the education of the blind.
The first school for the blind in the United States was established in Boston, Massachusetts, mainly thanks to Dr. John D. Fisher, a young doctor who had visited the French school. It became official in 1829 and was named the Perkins Institution and Massachusetts Asylum (now School) for the Blind in honor of T.H. Perkins (1764-1854), who donated his mansion to the school. The state provided support from the very beginning. In 1831, Dr. Samuel G. Howe (q.v.) was appointed director and held that role for nearly forty-four years before being succeeded by his son-in-law, Michael Anagnos (d. 1906), who created a kindergarten for the blind at Jamaica Plain, linked to the Perkins Institution. Dr. Howe was involved in various charitable and social causes, but his main focus was on helping the blind. One of his most significant accomplishments was educating Laura Bridgman (q.v.), who was deaf, mute, and blind, and this ultimately paved the way for the education of Helen Keller and other blind deaf-mutes. The New York Institution was incorporated in 1831, and the Pennsylvania Institution was established in 1833 in Philadelphia by the Society of Friends. The Ohio Institution was founded in Columbus in 1837, Virginia in Staunton in 1839, Kentucky in Louisville in 1842, Tennessee in Nashville in 1844, and now every state in the Union provides education for the blind.
Statistics
Stats
In England and Wales the total number of persons returned in 1901 as afflicted with blindness was 25,317, being in the proportion of 778 per million living, or 1 blind person in every 1285 of the population. The following table England and Wales. shows that the proportion of blind persons to population has diminished at each successive enumeration since 1851, in which year particulars of those afflicted in this manner were ascertained for the first time. It will, however, be noted that, although the decrease in the proportion of blind in the latest intercensal period was still considerable, yet the rate of decrease which had obtained between 1871 and 1891 was not maintained.—
In England and Wales, the total number of people reported as blind in 1901 was 25,317, which translates to a rate of 778 per million people, or 1 blind person for every 1,285 individuals in the population. The following table England & Wales. shows that the ratio of blind individuals to the total population has decreased with each census since 1851, the first year that detailed information about blindness was collected. However, it is worth noting that while there was still a significant drop in the proportion of blind people during the latest intercensal period, the rate of decline observed between 1871 and 1891 was not sustained.
Year. | Number of Blind. | Blind per Million of the Population. | Persons Living to one Blind Person. |
1851 | 18,306 | 1021 | 979 |
1861 | 19,352 | 964 | 1037 |
1871 | 21,590 | 951 | 1052 |
1881 | 22,832 | 879 | 1138 |
1891 | 23,467 | 809 | 1236 |
1901 | 25,317 | 778 | 1285 |
The following table, which gives the proportions of blind per million living at the earlier age-groups, shows that in the decennium 1891-1901, as also in recent previous intercensal periods, there was a decrease in the proportion of blind children in England and Wales generally; it thus lends support to the contention, in the General Report for 1891, that the decrease was due either to the lesser prevalence, or to the more efficient treatment, of purulent ophthalmia and other infantile maladies which may result in blindness.
The following table, which shows the number of blind people per million in younger age groups, demonstrates that in the decade from 1891 to 1901, as well as in the recent periods between censuses, there was a decline in the proportion of blind children in England and Wales overall. This supports the argument made in the General Report for 1891 that the decrease was likely due to either a lower prevalence or more effective treatment of purulent ophthalmia and other infant diseases that can lead to blindness.
Age-Period. | 1851 | 1861 | 1871 | 1881 | 1891 | 1901 |
Under 5 years | 198 | 196 | 185 | 166 | 155 | 129 |
5-10 | 297 | 256 | 259 | 288 | 188 | 192 |
10-15 | 365 | 366 | 359 | ” | 290 | 323 |
15-20 | 416 | 415 | 404 | 388 | 370 | 239 |
20-25 | 481 | 443 | 451 | 422 | 385 | 359 |
Total under 25 | 339 | 322 | 317 | 298 | 269 | 261 |
In 1886 a royal commission on the blind, deaf and dumb was appointed by the government, and, after taking much valuable evidence, issued an exhaustive and instructive report. Following on the practical recommendations submitted by this commission, the Elementary Education (Blind and Deaf Children) Act 1893, was passed, under which the education of the blind became for the first time compulsory. In terms of this statute, the school authorities were made responsible for the provision of suitable elementary education for blind children up to sixteen years of age, and grants of £3, 3s. for elementary subjects, and of £2, 2s. for industrial training, were contributed by the state towards the cost of educating children in schools certified as efficient within the meaning of the Elementary Education Act 1876. The principal aim of the Education Act of 1893 was to supply education in some useful profession or trade which will enable the blind to earn their livelihood and to become useful citizens; but the weak spot was that no provision was made therein for the completion of their education and industrial training after the age of sixteen.
In 1886, the government appointed a royal commission to address the needs of blind, deaf, and mute individuals. After gathering valuable evidence, they released a comprehensive and informative report. Based on the practical recommendations from this commission, the Elementary Education (Blind and Deaf Children) Act 1893 was passed, making education for blind children compulsory for the first time. According to this law, school authorities were responsible for providing suitable elementary education for blind children up to the age of sixteen, with the state contributing £3, 3s. for basic subjects and £2, 2s. for vocational training to help cover the costs in schools deemed efficient according to the Elementary Education Act 1876. The main goal of the Education Act of 1893 was to provide education in a useful profession or trade, enabling blind individuals to support themselves and become contributing members of society; however, a major flaw was that it did not include provisions for completing their education and vocational training after the age of sixteen.
In England and Wales, in 1907, there were twenty-four resident schools and forty-three workshops for the blind. In many of the large towns, day classes for the education of blind children have been established by local education authorities. There are forty-six home teaching societies, who send teachers to visit the blind in their homes, to teach adults who wish to learn to read, to act as colporteurs, to lend and exchange useful books, and to act as Scripture readers to those who are aged and infirm. All the home teaching societies for the blind and many public libraries lend embossed books. The public library at Oxford has nearly 400 volumes of classical works for the use of university students.
In England and Wales, in 1907, there were twenty-four schools for the blind and forty-three workshops. Many large towns established day classes to educate blind children through local education authorities. There are forty-six home teaching societies that send teachers to visit blind individuals in their homes, offering lessons to adults who want to learn to read, distributing books, and providing Scripture readings for the elderly and infirm. All home teaching societies for the blind, along with many public libraries, lend embossed books. The public library in Oxford has nearly 400 volumes of classical works available for university students.
A society was instituted in 1847 by Dr W. Moon for stereotyping and embossing the Scriptures and other books in “Moon” type. The type has been adapted to over 400 languages and dialects. After Dr Moon’s death in 1884 the work was carried on by his daughter, Miss Adelaide Moon, and the books are much used by the adult blind.
A society was founded in 1847 by Dr. W. Moon for creating embossed and printed versions of the Scriptures and other books in "Moon" type. This type has been adapted for over 400 languages and dialects. After Dr. Moon passed away in 1884, his daughter, Miss Adelaide Moon, continued the work, and the books are widely used by adults who are blind.
In 1868 Dr T.R. Armitage, being aware of the great improvements which had been made in the education of the blind in other countries, founded the British and Foreign Blind Association. This association was formed for the purpose of promoting the education and employment of the blind, by ascertaining what had been done in these respects in various countries, by endeavouring to supply deficiencies where these were found to exist, and by attempting to bring about greater harmony of action between the different existing schools and institutions. It gave a new impetus to the education and training of the blind in the United Kingdom. At that time their education was in a state of chaos. The Bible, or a great part of it, had been printed in five different systems. The founders took as an axiom that the relative merits of the various methods of education through the sense of touch should be decided by those and those only who have to rely on this sense. The council, who were all totally or partially blind, spent two years in comparing the different systems of embossed print. In 1869 and 1870 Dr Armitage corresponded with Dr J.R. Russ in regard to the New York Point. No trouble was spared to arrive at a right conclusion. The Braille system was finally adopted, and the association at once became a centre for supplying frames for writing Braille, printed books, maps, music and other educational apparatus for the blind. All books printed by the association are printed from stereotyped plates embossed by blind copyists. About 3000 separate works, varying in length from 1 to 12 volumes, have been copied by hand to meet the requirements of public libraries and individuals. About 700 ladies, who give their services, make the first Braille copy of these books, and they are recopied by blind scribes, chiefly women and girls, who are paid for their work.
In 1868, Dr. T.R. Armitage, recognizing the significant advancements in the education of the blind in other countries, established the British and Foreign Blind Association. This organization aimed to promote the education and employment of blind individuals by researching what had been accomplished in these areas globally, addressing any gaps that were identified, and fostering better collaboration among the various existing schools and institutions. It revitalized the education and training of blind people in the United Kingdom, which was then in disarray. The Bible, or large portions of it, had been printed using five different systems. The founders believed that decisions about the effectiveness of different tactile education methods should be made exclusively by those who rely on touch. The council, made up entirely of individuals who were fully or partially blind, spent two years evaluating the various embossed print systems. In 1869 and 1870, Dr. Armitage communicated with Dr. J.R. Russ about the New York Point system. Every effort was made to reach a sound decision. Ultimately, the Braille system was adopted, and the association quickly became a hub for providing Braille writing frames, printed books, maps, music, and other educational tools for blind individuals. All books printed by the association are made from stereotyped plates created by blind copyists. Approximately 3,000 individual works, ranging from 1 to 12 volumes, have been transcribed by hand to cater to the needs of public libraries and individuals. About 700 women volunteer to create the initial Braille copies of these books, which are then recopied by blind scribes, mostly women and girls, who are compensated for their work.
The National Lending library, London, was founded in 1882. It has over 5500 volumes in Braille and other types. Books are forwarded to all parts of the United Kingdom.
The National Lending Library, London, was established in 1882. It has more than 5,500 volumes in Braille and other formats. Books are sent to every part of the United Kingdom.
There are fourteen magazines published in embossed type in the United Kingdom.
There are fourteen magazines published in braille in the United Kingdom.
There are thirty-six pension societies—the principal are Hetherington’s, Day’s, the Clothworkers’, the Cordwainers’, the National Blind Relief Society, Royal Blind Pension Society and Indigent Blind Visiting Society.
There are thirty-six pension societies—the main ones are Hetherington’s, Day’s, the Clothworkers’, the Cordwainers’, the National Blind Relief Society, the Royal Blind Pension Society, and the Indigent Blind Visiting Society.
The Gardner Trust administers the income of £300,000 left by Henry Gardner in 1879. The income is used for instructing the blind in the profession of music, in suitable trades, handicrafts and professions other than music, for pensions, and free grants to institutions and individuals for special purposes.
The Gardner Trust manages the income from £300,000 left by Henry Gardner in 1879. This income is used to teach blind individuals music, as well as suitable trades, crafts, and professions besides music. It also supports pensions and provides grants to institutions and individuals for specific purposes.
According to the census of 1901, Scotland had 3253 (or 727 per million) blind persons, as against 2797 in 1891, but in a paper read at the conference in Edinburgh, 1906, the superintendent of the Glasgow Mission to the Out-door Blind stated Scotland. that there were 758 employed or being educated in institutions, and 3238 known as “out-door blind,” making a total of 3996. There are in Scotland ten missions, so distributed as to cover the whole country, and regular visits are made as far north as the Orkney and Shetland Islands. In carrying on the work, there are twenty-four paid missionaries or teachers and a large number of voluntary helpers. These societies originated in a desire to teach the blind to read in their own homes, and to provide them with the Scriptures and other religious books, but the social, intellectual and temporal needs of the blind also receive a large share of attention. These teachers afford the best means of circulating embossed literature, therefore the library committee of the Glasgow corporation has agreed to purchase books and place them in the mission library instead of in the public library. As the institutions provide for only a small number of the blind, strenuous efforts are made by the committee and teachers of missions to find some employment for the many adults who come under their care.
According to the 1901 census, Scotland had 3,253 (or 727 per million) blind individuals, compared to 2,797 in 1891. At a conference in Edinburgh in 1906, the superintendent of the Glasgow Mission to the Out-door Blind reported that there were 758 people employed or being educated in institutions and 3,238 classified as "out-door blind," totaling 3,996. Scotland has ten missions strategically located to serve the entire country, with regular visits extending as far north as the Orkney and Shetland Islands. To carry out this work, there are twenty-four paid missionaries or teachers along with a large number of volunteers. These organizations started with the goal of teaching the blind to read at home and providing them with the Scriptures and other religious texts, but they also address the social, intellectual, and practical needs of blind individuals. These teachers are instrumental in distributing embossed literature, which is why the library committee of the Glasgow corporation has decided to buy books and place them in the mission library instead of the public library. Since institutions can only accommodate a small number of the blind, the committee and mission teachers make every effort to find employment for the many adults they serve.
In Glasgow, a ladies’ auxiliary furnishes work for 150 knitters, and takes the responsibility of disposing of their work. In Scotland there are five schools for the young blind, and in connexion with each is a workshop for adults. In Edinburgh the school is at West Craigmillar, and the workshop in the city, but both are under the same board of directors.
In Glasgow, a women's group provides work for 150 knitters and takes care of selling their products. In Scotland, there are five schools for young blind people, each with a workshop for adults. In Edinburgh, the school is located at West Craigmillar, while the workshop is in the city, but both fall under the same board of directors.
According to the census of 1901, there were 4253 totally blind persons in Ireland, a proportion of 954 per million, as against 1135 in 1891. Of these, 2430 were over 60 years of age and 11 over 100. These figures do not include the partially Ireland. blind, who numbered 1217. The fact that so many aged blind persons are to be found in Ireland is doubtless due to an ophthalmic epidemic which occurred during the Irish famine. There are twelve institutions, a home mission and home teaching society; nine of these institutions are asylums, that system having been largely adopted in Ireland. The scarcity of manufacturing industries, except in a few northern counties, entails a lack of work suited to the blind. The Elementary Education Act (Blind and Deaf) does not extend to Ireland.
According to the 1901 census, there were 4,253 completely blind people in Ireland, which is a rate of 954 per million, compared to 1,135 in 1891. Out of these, 2,430 were over 60 years old, and 11 were over 100. These numbers do not include the partially blind, who totaled 1,217. The large number of elderly blind individuals in Ireland is likely due to an eye disease outbreak that happened during the Irish famine. There are twelve institutions, one home mission, and one home teaching society; nine of these institutions are asylums, which have become common in Ireland. The lack of manufacturing industries, apart from a few northern counties, means there are not many jobs suitable for blind individuals. The Elementary Education Act (Blind and Deaf) does not apply to Ireland.
The following table gives the number of blind in age-groups in 1901:—
The following table shows the number of blind individuals in different age groups in 1901:—
Age-Period. | Number. | Age-Period. | Number. |
Under 5 years | 10 | 50-55 | 392 |
5-10 | 38 | 55-60 | 314 |
10-15 | 64 | 60-65 | 617 |
15-20 | 73 | 65-70 | 382 |
20-25 | 95 | 70-75 | 540 |
25-30 | 116 | 75-80 | 306 |
30-35 | 146 | 80-85 | 372 |
35-40 | 146 | 85-90 | 118 |
40-45 | 205 | 95 and upwards | 95 |
45-50 | 224 |
In the Dominion of Canada, South Africa, the states of the Australian Commonwealth and New Zealand, provision is made by the government for the education of the young blind, and British Colonies. in some cases for training the adults in handicrafts. Embossed literature is carried free of expense, and on the Victorian railways no charge is made for the guide who accompanies a blind person.
In Canada, South Africa, the Australian states, and New Zealand, the government provides education for young blind individuals, and in some instances, offers training for adults in crafts. Braille materials are delivered at no cost, and on the Victorian railways, there’s no fee for a guide who accompanies a blind person.
The following were the census returns for 1901:—
The census results for 1901 were as follows:—
Victoria | 1082 | Tasmania | 173 |
New South Wales | 884 | New Zealand | 274 (1891) |
South Australia | 315 | Natal | 68 |
Queensland | 209 | Cape Colony | 2802 (1904) |
West Australia | 121 | Canada | 3279 |
In Australia there are institutions for the blind at Melbourne, Sydney, Adelaide, Brighton, Brisbane and Maylands near Perth. In New Zealand the institution is at Auckland.
In Australia, there are facilities for the blind in Melbourne, Sydney, Adelaide, Brighton, Brisbane, and Maylands near Perth. In New Zealand, the facility is in Auckland.
In Cape Colony between 1875 and 1891, there was an extraordinary increase in blindness, but between 1891 and 1904 the rate per 10,000 has decreased 23.78%. There is an institution at Worcester for deaf-mutes and blind, founded in 1881. It is supported by a government grant, fees and subscription.
In Cape Colony from 1875 to 1891, there was an incredible rise in blindness, but from 1891 to 1904, the rate per 10,000 dropped by 23.78%. There’s an institution in Worcester for the deaf and blind, established in 1881. It is funded by a government grant, fees, and donations.
Schools for the blind were established by the Dominion government at Brantford, Ontario (1871), and Halifax, Nova Scotia (1867).
Schools for the blind were set up by the Dominion government in Brantford, Ontario (1871), and Halifax, Nova Scotia (1867).
In Montreal there are two private institutions, the M‘Kay Institute for Protestant Deaf-Mutes and Blind, and a school for Roman Catholic children under the charge of the Sisters of Charity.
In Montreal, there are two private institutions: the M'Kay Institute for Protestant Deaf-Mutes and Blind individuals, and a school for Roman Catholic children run by the Sisters of Charity.
In the United States the education of the blind is not regarded as a charity, but forms part of the educational system of the country, and is carried on at the public expense. According to the Annual Report of the Commissioner of Education United States. for 1908, there were 40 state schools, with 4340 pupils. The value of apparatus, grounds and buildings was $9,201,161. For salaries and other expenditure, the aggregate was $1,460,732. The United States government appropriates $10,000 annually for printing embossed books, which are distributed among the different state schools for the blind. Beside these state schools, there are workshops for the blind subsidized by the state government or the municipality. Commissions composed of able men have recently been appointed in several of the states to take charge of the affairs of the blind from infancy to old age. The exhaustive summary of the 12th census enables these commissions to communicate with every blind person in their respective states.
In the United States, education for the blind is not seen as a charity but is part of the country's educational system and is funded by public money. According to the Annual Report of the Commissioner of Education USA. for 1908, there were 40 state schools with 4,340 students. The total value of equipment, land, and buildings was $9,201,161. For salaries and other expenses, the total was $1,460,732. The U.S. government allocates $10,000 each year for printing embossed books, which are distributed to various state schools for the blind. In addition to these state schools, there are workshops for the blind funded by state or local governments. Recently, commissions made up of capable individuals have been appointed in several states to oversee the needs of blind individuals from infancy to old age. The detailed summary from the 12th census allows these commissions to connect with every blind person in their respective states.
At the 12th census a change was made in the plan for securing the returns, and the work of the enumerators was restricted to a brief preliminary return, showing only the name, sex, age, post office address, and nature of the existing defects in all persons alleged to be blind or deaf. Dr Alexander Graham Bell, of Washington, D.C., was appointed expert special agent of the census office for the preparation of a report on the deaf and blind. He was empowered to conduct in his own name a correspondence relating to this branch of the census inquiry. A circular containing eighteen questions was addressed to every blind person given in the census, and from the data contained in the replies the following tables (I., II., III., IV.) have been compiled.
At the 12th census, a change was made in the plan for collecting the data, and the job of the enumerators was limited to a brief preliminary return, showing only the name, gender, age, postal address, and the nature of existing disabilities in all individuals reported to be blind or deaf. Dr. Alexander Graham Bell, from Washington, D.C., was appointed as the expert special agent of the census office to prepare a report on the deaf and blind. He was authorized to conduct correspondence related to this part of the census inquiry under his own name. A circular with eighteen questions was sent to every blind person listed in the census, and from the information received in the replies, the following tables (I., II., III., IV.) have been compiled.
Table I.—The Blind, by Degree of Blindness and Sex.
Table 1.—The Blind, by Degree of Blindness and Gender.
Sex. | The Blind. | The Totally Blind. | The Partially Blind. |
Number— | |||
Total | 64,763 | 35,645 | 29,118 |
Male | 37,054 | 20,144 | 16,190 |
Female | 27,709 | 15,501 | 12,208 |
Per cent distribution— | |||
Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Male | 57.2 | 56.5 | 58.1 |
Female | 42.8 | 43.5 | 41.9 |
Number per 1,000,000 population of same sex— | |||
Both sexes | 852 | 469 | 383 |
Male | 955 | 519 | 436 |
Female | 745 | 417 | 328 |
The enumerators reported a total of 101,123 persons alleged to be blind as defined in the instructions contained in the schedules, but this number was greatly reduced as a result of the correspondence directly with the individuals, 8842 reporting that the alleged defect did not exist, and 6544 that they were blind only in one eye but were able to see with the other, and hence did not come within the scope of the inquiry. No replies were received in 19,884 cases in which personal schedules were sent, although repeated inquiries were made; consequently these cases were dropped. In 380 cases the personal schedules returned were too incomplete for use, and in 75 cases duplication was discovered. The number of cases remaining for statistical treatment, after making the eliminations and corrections, was 64,763, representing 35,645 totally blind, and 29,118 partially blind. This number, however, can be considered only as the minimum, as an unknown proportion of the blind were not located by the enumerators, and doubtless a considerable proportion of the 19,884 persons who failed to return the personal schedules should be included in the total.
The enumerators reported a total of 101,123 people claimed to be blind as defined in the instructions provided in the schedules, but this number was significantly reduced after contacting individuals directly. Of those contacted, 8,842 reported that the claimed defect didn't exist, and 6,544 said they were blind in only one eye but could see with the other, so they didn’t fall under the inquiry. No responses were received for 19,884 cases where personal schedules were sent, despite multiple follow-ups; therefore, these cases were dropped. In 380 cases, the personal schedules returned were too incomplete to be useful, and in 75 cases, duplication was found. After making the necessary eliminations and corrections, the number of cases left for statistical analysis was 64,763, which included 35,645 totally blind and 29,118 partially blind individuals. However, this number can only be considered a minimum since a certain percentage of the blind individuals were not found by the enumerators, and undoubtedly, a significant portion of the 19,884 people who did not return the personal schedules should be included in the total.
“Blindness, either total or partial, is so largely a defect of the aged, and occurs with so much greater frequency as the age advances and the population diminishes, that in any comparison of the proportion of the blind in the general population of different classes, such as native and foreign-born whites, or white and coloured, the age distribution of the population of each class should be constantly borne in mind. The differences in this respect account for many of the differences in the gross ratios, and it is only when ratios are compared for classes of population of identical ages that their relative liability to blindness can be properly inferred.”
“Blindness, whether total or partial, is primarily a condition of older people and occurs more frequently as people age and the population declines. Therefore, when comparing the proportion of blind individuals across various groups, such as native and foreign-born whites or white and colored communities, it's important to consider the age distribution of each group. These age differences explain many of the variations in overall ratios, and only by comparing ratios for groups of the same age can we accurately determine their relative risk of blindness.”
Table II.—The Blind, by Degree of Blindness, Age-Periods, Colour and Nativity.
Table 2.—The Blind, by Degree of Blindness, Age Groups, Color and Place of Birth.
Degree of Blindness and Age-Period. | All Classes. | White. | Coloured. | ||
Total. | Native. | Foreign- born. | |||
Number— | |||||
The blind | 64,763 | 56,535 | 45,479 | 10,694 | 8228 |
Under 20 years | 8,308 | 7,252 | 6,937 | 231 | 1056 |
20 years and over | 56,165 | 49,067 | 38,388 | 10,420 | 7098 |
Age unknown | 290 | 216 | 154 | 43 | 74 |
The totally blind | 35,645 | 30,359 | 23,636 | 6,511 | 5286 |
Under 20 years | 4,123 | 3,543 | 3,377 | 129 | 580 |
20 years and over | 31,363 | 26,704 | 20,179 | 6,636 | 4639 |
Age unknown | 159 | 112 | 80 | 19 | 27 |
The partially blind | 29,118 | 26,176 | 21,843 | 4,183 | 2942 |
Under 20 years | 4,185 | 3,709 | 3,560 | 102 | 476 |
20 years and over | 24,802 | 22,363 | 18,209 | 4,057 | 2439 |
Age unknown | 131 | 104 | 74 | 24 | 27 |
Number per 1,000,000 population of same age— | |||||
The blind | 852 | 846 | 804 | 1,047 | 896 |
Under 20 years | 247 | 250 | 248 | 215 | 229 |
20 years and over | 1,334 | 1,305 | 1,348 | 1,143 | 1574 |
The totally blind | 469 | 454 | 418 | 637 | 576 |
Under 20 years | 123 | 122 | 121 | 120 | 126 |
20 years and over | 745 | 710 | 708 | 698 | 1033 |
The partially blind | 383 | 392 | 386 | 410 | 320 |
Under 20 years | 124 | 128 | 127 | 95 | 103 |
20 years and over | 589 | 595 | 639 | 445 | 541 |
Table II. shows the classification, by degree of blindness, of the blind under twenty years of age, twenty years of age and over, and of unknown age, with respect to colour and nativity, with the number at the specified ages per million of population in the same age-group.
Table II. shows the classification, by degree of blindness, of the blind under twenty years old, twenty years old and up, and of unknown age, regarding color and place of birth, with the number at the specified ages per million of the population in the same age group.
The relationship or consanguinity of parents of the 64,763 blind was reported in 56,507 cases, in 2527 (or 4.5%) of which the parents were related as cousins.
The relationship or family connection of the parents of the 64,763 blind individuals was reported in 56,507 cases, in which 2,527 (or 4.5%) of the parents were related as cousins.
In 57,726 cases the inquiry as to the existence of blind relatives was answered; 10,967 (or 19%) of this number reported that they had blind relatives.
In 57,726 cases, the question about having blind relatives was answered; 10,967 (or 19%) of those reported that they had blind relatives.
Of the 2527 blind persons whose parents were cousins, 993 (or 39.3%) had blind relatives,—844 having blind brothers, sisters or ancestors, and 149 having blind collateral relatives or descendants.
Of the 2,527 blind people whose parents were cousins, 993 (or 39.3%) had blind relatives—844 had blind siblings or ancestors, and 149 had blind collateral relatives or descendants.
Of the 53,980 blind whose parents were not related, 9490 (or 17.6%) had blind relatives, 7395 having blind brothers, sisters or ancestors, and 2095 having blind collateral relatives or descendants.
Of the 53,980 blind people whose parents were not related, 9,490 (or 17.6%) had blind relatives, with 7,395 having blind brothers, sisters, or ancestors, and 2,095 having blind collateral relatives or descendants.
It was found that, of the 2527 blind whose parents were cousins, 632 (or 25%) were congenitally blind, of whom 350 (or 55.4%) had also blind relatives of the classes specified; while, among the 53,980 whose parents were not so related, the number of congenitally blind was 3666 (or but 6.8%), of whom only 1023 (or 27.9%) had blind relatives.
It was found that, out of the 2,527 blind individuals whose parents were cousins, 632 (or 25%) were congenitally blind. Among them, 350 (or 55.4%) had blind relatives within the specified categories. In contrast, among the 53,980 individuals whose parents were not related, the number of congenitally blind was 3,666 (or only 6.8%), with just 1,023 (or 27.9%) having blind relatives.
In 1883 the number of blind in France was estimated at 32,056, the total population of the country being 38,000,000; 2548 of the France. 65 blind were under, and 29,508 above, 21 years of age; of the former 857 were receiving instruction in 21 schools supported by the state, by the city of Paris, by some of the departments, and by some religious bodies. The four Parisian institutions are the Institution Nationale des Jeunes Aveugles, the École Braille (founded in 1883), the Établissement des Soeurs Aveugles de St Paul (founded in 1852), and that of the Frères de Saint Jean de Dieu (founded in 1875).
In 1883, the estimated number of blind individuals in France was 32,056, with the country's total population being 38,000,000. Out of the blind population, 2,548 were under 21 years of age, and 29,508 were over 21. Among those under 21, 857 were receiving education in 21 schools supported by the state, the city of Paris, some departments, and various religious organizations. The four institutions in Paris are the Institution Nationale des Jeunes Aveugles, the École Braille (founded in 1883), the Établissement des Soeurs Aveugles de St Paul (founded in 1852), and the Frères de Saint Jean de Dieu (founded in 1875).
Table III.—The Blind, by Degree of Blindness and Age-Periods.
Table 3.—The Blind, by Degree of Blindness and Age-Periods.
Age-Period. | The Blind. | The Totally Blind. | The Partially Blind. |
Number— | |||
All Ages | 64,763 | 35,645 | 29,118 |
Under 10 years | 2,307 | 1,262 | 1,045 |
10-19 years | 6,001 | 2,861 | 3,140 |
20-29 ” | 4,861 | 2,851 | 2,010 |
30-39 ” | 5,024 | 3,077 | 1,947 |
40-49 ” | 6,504 | 3,778 | 2,726 |
50-59 ” | 8,530 | 4,791 | 3,739 |
60-69 ” | 10,507 | 5,835 | 4,672 |
70-79 ” | 11,421 | 6,132 | 5,289 |
80-89 ” | 7,490 | 3,885 | 3,605 |
90-99 ” | 1,596 | 851 | 745 |
100 years and over | 232 | 163 | 69 |
Age unknown | 290 | 159 | 131 |
Number per 1,000,000 population of same age— | |||
All ages | 852 | 469 | 383 |
Under 10 years | 128 | 70 | 58 |
10-19 years | 384 | 183 | 201 |
20-29 ” | 351 | 206 | 145 |
30-39 ” | 478 | 293 | 185 |
40-49 ” | 845 | 491 | 354 |
50-59 ” | 1,655 | 930 | 725 |
60-69 ” | 3,396 | 1,886 | 1,510 |
70-79 ” | 8,136 | 4,368 | 3,768 |
80-89 ” | 22,022 | 11,423 | 10,599 |
90-99 ” | 52,746 | 28,125 | 24,621 |
100 years and over | 66,210 | 46,518 | 19,692 |
Age unknown | 1,446 | 793 | 653 |
The number of the blind in Germany was about 39,000, or 870 per million in 1885. The number of institutions was 28, nearly all being educational, with a total of 2139 pupils. All these institutions, except two which are supported entirely by Germany. private munificence, are largely assisted by the state, the communes or the provinces. Seventeen of them derive their entire requirements from the state, so that they are quite independent of private charity, while the remainder are only supplemented from public funds so far as the private contributions fall short of the expenses.
The number of blind individuals in Germany was about 39,000, or 870 per million, in 1885. There were 28 institutions, almost all focused on education, with a total of 2,139 students. All these institutions, except for two that are fully funded by private donations, are mainly supported by the government, local communities, or provinces. Seventeen of them receive all their funding from the state, making them entirely independent of private charity, while the others receive public funds only to cover any shortfall in private contributions.
The following extracts were made from an official communication from Hofrath Büttner, director of the institution for the blind in Dresden, Saxony system. to the royal commission, concerning the care and supervision (Fürsorge) of the blind after their discharge from the institution:—
The following excerpts were taken from an official communication from Hofrath Büttner, the director of the institution for the blind in Dresden, Saxony setup. to the royal commission, regarding the care and supervision (Fürsorge) of the blind after they leave the institution:—
“When twenty years of age, the blind are usually discharged from the institution. Long experience has taught us that the care and supervision of the blind after their discharge from the institution are quite as important as their education and training in the institution. It would, in our opinion, be unjust to remove them from their sad surroundings, educate and accustom them to higher wants, and then allow them to sink backward into their former miserable way of life. After much deliberation it was decided to remain in connexion with the discharged blind, to visit them in their places of abode, to learn their wants, to study the difficulties which they experienced in supporting themselves independently, and, as far as possible, to remove their grievances. Director Georgi began this work in 1843. Director Reinhard continued it from 1867 to 1879, and the present director has followed the same path. With the knowledge of these difficulties the Fürsorge (care) for discharged blind steadily advanced, and has won the confidence of the Saxon people. It was decided that, on the discharge of the blind person, the director should select a trustworthy person, residing in his future place of abode, to give him advice and practical help, to protect him from imposition, and to keep up communication with the director. If this guardian is unable to advise or help, he then writes to the director, who, if necessary, comes to the place, and this is all the easier as he travels free on all railways in Saxony. The result of these visits, as well as all communications from the guardian, the letters from the blind person, and every document relating to him, are entered in a register kept at the institution. These guardians are respectable, benevolent, practical men, capable of procuring custom for their wards. But there was no doubt that, in spite of these arrangements, the discharged blind were unable to support themselves without the assistance of capital, whether in money or outfit. The blind man can do as good work as the man who can see; but as a rule he does not work so quickly, and if the man who is not blind has to use every exertion to support himself and his family, the blind man to do the same requires some special help, without which he will either not be able to compete, or will have to lead a life of great privation.
“When individuals reach the age of twenty, they are typically released from the institution for the blind. Long experience has shown us that caring for and supervising the blind after they leave the institution is just as important as their education and training while they are there. We believe it would be unfair to take them out of their unfortunate circumstances, educate them, and help them adjust to higher expectations, only to let them fall back into their previous miserable lives. After careful consideration, it was decided to stay connected with the discharged blind, to visit them in their homes, learn about their needs, study the challenges they face in becoming self-sufficient, and do our best to address their issues. Director Georgi started this effort in 1843. Director Reinhard continued from 1867 to 1879, and the current director has followed the same approach. With an understanding of these challenges, the Fürsorge (care) for discharged blind individuals progressed steadily, earning the trust of the Saxon people. It was decided that when a blind person is discharged, the director would choose a reliable person living in their future home to offer advice and practical assistance, protect them from being taken advantage of, and maintain communication with the director. If this guardian is unable to provide help or advice, they can write to the director, who will come to the location if necessary, which is made easier by the fact that he can travel for free on all railways in Saxony. The outcomes of these visits, as well as all communications from the guardian, letters from the blind person, and any related documents, are logged in a register at the institution. These guardians are respectable, caring, and practical individuals capable of finding work for their wards. However, there’s no doubt that despite these arrangements, released blind individuals struggle to support themselves without financial assistance or resources. A blind person can perform work as well as a sighted individual; however, they typically do not work as quickly. If a sighted person must put in every effort to support themselves and their family, a blind person will need additional support to do the same, without which they may either be unable to compete or will face a life of significant hardship.”
“The first difficulty when a blind pupil is starting in life is to provide himself with the necessary tools and material. These the institution supplies to him, and continues through life to afford him moral and material help; and by this means the greater part of the blind are enabled to save money for sickness and old age. Those who cannot return to their relations cannot at once meet all their expenses, and the weak and old need special help. A part of the money for their board and lodging is paid for those who have to be settled in other places on account of the death or untrustworthiness of their relatives.
“The first challenge for a blind student starting out in life is to get the essential tools and materials. The institution provides these for him and continues to offer moral and financial support throughout his life; this way, most blind individuals can save money for illness and retirement. Those who are unable to return to their families can't immediately cover all their expenses, and the elderly or frail require extra assistance. Part of the funding for their food and housing is covered for those who need to be placed elsewhere due to the death or unreliability of their relatives.”
“The fund for the discharged blind is administered by the director of the institution. The number of those assisted amounts at present to about 400, who live respectably in all parts of Saxony, are almost self-supporting, and feel themselves free men. For, just as a son does not feel galled by a gift from his father, so they are not ashamed to receive assistance from their second paternal home, the institution.”
“The fund for blind individuals who have been discharged is managed by the director of the institution. Currently, around 400 people are receiving help, living with dignity throughout Saxony, nearly supporting themselves, and considering themselves free individuals. Just as a son doesn’t feel burdened by a gift from his father, they are not embarrassed to receive assistance from their second family, the institution.”
The number of the blind in Holland, according to the census of the 1st of December 1869, was 1593, or one in every 2247 of the general population. The Protestants and Roman Catholics were about equally balanced. No cognizance was taken of the Holland. blind in the census of 1879. There is only one blind institution, that of Amsterdam, with 60 pupils, with a preparatory school at Benuchem (with 20 pupils) and an asylum for adults with 52 inmates (unmarried). Besides these, there are workshops at Amsterdam, Rotterdam, the Hague, Utrecht and Middelburg.
The number of blind people in Holland, according to the census on December 1, 1869, was 1,593, which is one in every 2,247 of the general population. The Protestants and Roman Catholics were about evenly matched. The census of 1879 did not account for the blind. There is only one institution for the blind in Amsterdam, which has 60 pupils, along with a preparatory school in Benuchem (with 20 pupils) and an asylum for adults with 52 residents (who are unmarried). In addition, there are workshops in Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague, Utrecht, and Middelburg.
According to the census of 1870, there were in Denmark 1249 blind (577 males and 672 females), or one blind for every 1428 persons. One institution has been established by government, i.e. the Royal Institution for the Blind, at Copenhagen; Denmark. 100 children, aged 10 and upwards, are here educated. There is a preparatory school for blind children under 10 years of age, and an asylum for blind females, most of whom are former pupils of the royal school. An association for promoting the self-dependence of the blind assists not only former pupils of the school but every blind man or woman willing and able to work.
According to the 1870 census, Denmark had 1,249 blind individuals (577 males and 672 females), which means there was one blind person for every 1,428 individuals. The government established one institution, namely the Royal Institution for the Blind in Copenhagen; i.e. in Denmark. Here, 100 children aged 10 and older receive education. There is also a preparatory school for blind children younger than 10 years old, along with a residence for blind women, most of whom were former students of the royal school. An association that promotes the independence of blind individuals supports not only former students of the school but also any blind man or woman who is willing and able to work.
Table IV.—The Blind, by Consanguinity of Parents, Degree of Blindness, and Blind Relatives of Other Classes.
Table 4.—The Blind, by Relationship of Parents, Level of Blindness, and Blind Relatives from Other Categories.
Consanguinity of Parents. | Total. | Blind Brothers, Sisters or Ancestors. |
Collateral Relatives or De- scendants alone, Blind. |
No Blind Relatives or Rela- tives by Marriage alone, Blind. |
Not Stated. |
All Classes— | |||||
The blind | 64,763 | 8629 | 2338 | 46,759 | 7037 |
Totally blind | 35,645 | 4378 | 1215 | 25,349 | 3703 |
Partially blind | 29,118 | 4251 | 1123 | 20,410 | 3334 |
Parents cousins— | |||||
The blind | 2,527 | 844 | 149 | 1,456 | 78 |
Totally blind | 1,291 | 435 | 78 | 739 | 39 |
Partially blind | 1,236 | 409 | 71 | 717 | 39 |
Parents not cousins— | |||||
The blind | 53,980 | 7395 | 2095 | 43,368 | 1122 |
Totally blind | 29,892 | 3720 | 1090 | 24,541 | 541 |
Partially blind | 24,088 | 3675 | 1005 | 18,827 | 581 |
Consanguinity of parents not stated— | |||||
The blind | 8,256 | 390 | 94 | 1,935 | 5837 |
Totally blind | 4,462 | 223 | 47 | 1,069 | 3123 |
Partially blind | 3,794 | 167 | 47 | 866 | 2714 |
The number of blind persons in Sweden, according to the census of December 1880, was 3723, being at the rate of one blind person for every 1226 of the general population. At the beginning of the year 1879, the instruction of the blind in Sweden was completely Sweden. separated from that of the deaf and dumb, on the grounds that it hindered the intellectual development of the blind—a conclusion which experience shows to be tolerably correct. Since 66 July 1888 the Royal Institution of the Blind has obtained a new building at Tomteboda, near Stockholm.
The number of blind people in Sweden, according to the census from December 1880, was 3,723, which means there was one blind person for every 1,226 people in the general population. At the start of 1879, the education of blind individuals in Sweden was completely separated from that of the deaf and mute, because it was believed that combining them hindered the intellectual development of the blind—an idea that experience has shown to be fairly accurate. Since July 1888, the Royal Institution for the Blind has acquired a new building in Tomteboda, near Stockholm.
The law of the 8th of July 1881, concerning the instruction of abnormal children, has imposed on the state the duty of establishing a sufficient number of schools for the blind in Norway Norway. as well as for the other abnormal children. All the blind of the country, from 9 years of age until the age of 21, are compelled to be educated, with a maximum of 8 years of instruction for each pupil.
The law from July 8, 1881, regarding the education of children with disabilities, requires the state to set up enough schools for blind students in Norway Norway. as well as for other children with disabilities. All blind individuals in the country, from 9 to 21 years old, must receive an education, with a maximum of 8 years of instruction for each student.
The census of 1873 showed that in Finland there were 7959 blind in a total population of about 2,000,000 inhabitants, the proportion reaching the very high figure of one for every 251 of the Finland. total population. Nevertheless there were only 160 of school age. For these there are two institutions, one at Helsingfors where the instruction is given in the Swedish language, and where there are about 12 pupils, and another at Kuopio, where the instruction is given in the Finnish language, and where the pupils number about 30.
The census of 1873 showed that in Finland there were 7,959 blind people out of a total population of about 2,000,000 inhabitants, which means the ratio was quite high at one in every 251 of the total population. However, there were only 160 of school age. For these children, there are two institutions: one in Helsinki where instruction is conducted in Swedish, with about 12 students, and another in Kuopio where instruction is in Finnish, with around 30 students.
According to information received from the I.R. Central Commission for Statistics, the number of blind in the provinces represented in the Austrian Reichsrath amounted to 15,582 in the year Austria. 1884. Of these, 2345 were children up to 15 years of age, namely 433 below 5, 779 from 5 to 10, and 1113 from 10 to 15 years. The total number of institutions for blind children in Austria amounts to 8. The blind children of school age who are not placed in special institutions are compulsorily taught in the public general free schools, as far as practicable. The number of blind in the whole dominion of the crown of St Stephen was 208,391.
According to information from the I.R. Central Commission for Statistics, the number of blind individuals in the provinces represented in the Austrian Reichsrath was 15,582 in 1884. Out of these, 2,345 were children up to 15 years old, specifically 433 under 5, 779 between 5 and 10, and 1,113 from 10 to 15 years. There are a total of 8 institutions for blind children in Austria. Blind children of school age who are not in special institutions are required to be educated in public general free schools whenever possible. The total number of blind individuals in the entire dominion of the crown of St. Stephen was 208,391.
The number of blind persons in Italy was 21,718, according to the census of 1881, and those of school age were estimated to form 25% Italy. of the whole, or about 5429 in number. But no special cognizance of the blind is taken in the government census. There are 20 institutions, schools and workshops for the blind.
The number of blind people in Italy was 21,718, according to the 1881 census, and those of school age were estimated to make up 25% Italy. of the total, which is about 5,429. However, the government census does not pay special attention to the blind. There are 20 institutions, schools, and workshops for the blind.
Statistics with regard to the number and condition of the blind in the Russian empire are of a very limited character, and it is only of late years that any attempt has been made to draw Russia. up any accurate returns with regard to them. The total number of the blind throughout the empire is generally reckoned at from 160,000 to 200,000, thus making 1600 to 2000 per million inhabitants. In Russia there are 21 institutions for the support of the blind.
Statistics about the number and condition of blind people in the Russian empire are quite limited, and only in recent years have efforts been made to create accurate data on the subject. The total number of blind individuals across the empire is usually estimated to be between 160,000 and 200,000, which translates to about 1,600 to 2,000 per million inhabitants. In Russia, there are 21 institutions dedicated to supporting the blind.
“In Egypt the blind are very numerous in comparison with other countries, and although no exact statistics are at present obtainable on this point, it is computed that the proportion is at least one totally blind person to every 50 of the population. Egypt This is principally the result of acute ophthalmia occurring in infancy, and it is fostered by the superstitious observance which prevents the mothers from washing their children from the time of birth until they are two years old, at which late date only they are weaned. There is also a great deal of infection carelessly and ignorantly conveyed direct from eye to eye, by means of unwashed fingers, and this is accountable for the occurrence of much more eye-disease than any that may be caused by the proverbial flies. The only employment followed by the blind, both Mahommedan and Coptic (or native Christian), and that only to a limited extent, is recitation aloud—the former repeating portions of the Koran at funerals, and the latter chanting the church-ritual in their services; the blind girls and women are without occupation. Practically no education is given to the blind as a class, and anything which they learn has to be acquired orally by frequent repetition. The blind were not always so completely neglected, as the native ecclesiastical authorities (Wakf) gave an annual grant of £2000 for the continued maintenance of a school for the blind and the deaf and dumb in Cairo, which taught about 80 day-pupils; the latter years of the school were passed under the ministry of education, and it was ultimately discontinued. Such a condition of affairs appealed to Dr T.R. Armitage, and explains his motive in trying to establish some proper means for affording the blind in Egypt the necessary scholastic instruction and other training. In Egypt, as in other countries, it is occasionally very difficult, and takes some time, to start any enterprise such as this on a satisfactory and practical footing, and it was left for Mrs T.R. Armitage to be the means of successfully carrying out her husband’s wishes in this particular. In 1900 Mrs Armitage asked Dr Kenneth Scott to prepare a scheme for the education and welfare of the blind in Egypt, on lines suggested to her. This, through the British and Foreign Blind Association, was submitted to Queen Victoria, who graciously commanded it to be sent, through the foreign office, to the khedive, who in mark of approbation and encouragement generously gave a handsome donation towards its realization. The Institution for the Blind was established at Zeitoun, Cairo, early in the year 1901, through funds provided by Mrs T.R. Armitage. The object of the institution, which is wholly unsectarian in character, is to educate and train the blind mentally and physically and in industrial occupations, and at the same time to improve their moral standard, so that eventually they may become in great measure, or even completely, self-supporting.” (Dr Kenneth Scott.)
“In Egypt, there are significantly more blind people compared to other countries. While exact statistics are not currently available, it's estimated that there is at least one totally blind person for every 50 people in the population. Egypt This largely results from severe eye infections in infancy, compounded by superstitious practices that prevent mothers from washing their children from birth until they are two years old, which is also when they are weaned. Additionally, a lot of eye infections are transmitted carelessly and unknowingly from one person to another through unwashed hands, leading to far more eye diseases than those caused by the usual flies. The blind, both Muslim and Coptic (native Christian), primarily engage in limited recitation work—Muslims read parts of the Koran at funerals, while Copts chant the church rituals during services; blind girls and women have no job opportunities. Generally, there is little to no education for the blind as a group, and any knowledge they gain has to be learned orally through constant repetition. The blind were not always so neglected; native religious authorities (Wakf) used to provide an annual grant of £2,000 to maintain a school for the blind and deaf in Cairo, which served about 80 day students; however, in later years, control of the school shifted to the ministry of education, and it eventually closed. This situation caught the attention of Dr. T.R. Armitage, motivating him to seek proper means to provide necessary education and training for the blind in Egypt. Starting such initiatives in Egypt, like in many other places, can be quite challenging and time-consuming, and it was up to Mrs. T.R. Armitage to successfully fulfill her husband's vision in this area. In 1900, Mrs. Armitage requested Dr. Kenneth Scott to develop a program for the education and welfare of the blind in Egypt based on her suggestions. This proposal was submitted to Queen Victoria through the British and Foreign Blind Association, and she graciously ordered it to be forwarded to the khedive, who, in recognition and support, generously donated a substantial amount towards its realization. The Institution for the Blind was established in Zeitoun, Cairo, early in 1901, funded by Mrs. T.R. Armitage. The aim of this institution, which is completely non-sectarian, is to provide mental and physical education and training in industrial skills for the blind, as well as to enhance their moral standards, enabling them to become largely or entirely self-sufficient.” (Dr. Kenneth Scott.)
India has a large proportion of blind inhabitants, ranging from one in 600 in some provinces, to one in 400 in others, with a total of more than half a million. Until recently, little had been done in the way of organized effort to educate them, though many of the India. missionaries had helped individual cases. At Amritsar a large and well-organized work for the blind has been carried on for many years. This school has now been moved to Rajpur, and helps 70 blind women and children. In 1903 a government school and hospital were established at Bombay as a memorial to Queen Victoria. Reading, writing, arithmetic, tailoring, typewriting, carpentering, lathe-work and carpet-weaving are taught. There are small schools at Parantij, Calcutta, Palancottah, Calicut, Coorg, Chota-Nagpur, and at Moulmein in Burma. The memorial to Queen Victoria in Ceylon took the form of work for the blind. J. Knowles, with the help of L. Garthwaite of the Indian Civil Service, devised a scheme of oriental Braille, which has been adopted by the British and Foreign Bible Society for the production of the Scriptures in Eastern languages.
India has a significant number of blind people, with rates ranging from one in 600 in some regions to one in 400 in others, totaling over half a million. Until recently, there was little organized effort to educate them, although many missionaries helped individuals. In Amritsar, a large and well-organized initiative for the blind has been in operation for many years. This school has now relocated to Rajpur and supports 70 blind women and children. In 1903, a government school and hospital were set up in Bombay as a tribute to Queen Victoria. Subjects taught include reading, writing, arithmetic, tailoring, typewriting, carpentry, lathe work, and carpet weaving. Smaller schools exist in Parantij, Calcutta, Palancottah, Calicut, Coorg, Chota-Nagpur, and Moulmein in Burma. The tribute to Queen Victoria in Ceylon also focused on helping the blind. J. Knowles, with support from L. Garthwaite of the Indian Civil Service, developed a system of oriental Braille, which has been adopted by the British and Foreign Bible Society to produce Scriptures in Eastern languages.
Blindness is very prevalent in China, and to eye-diseases, neglect and dirt, must be added leprosy and smallpox as causes. Blind beggars may be seen on every highway, clamouring for alms. As in India their pitiful condition attracted the China. attention of the missionaries. W.H. Murray, a Scottish missionary in Peking, made a simple and ingenious adaptation of the Braille symbols to the complicated system of Chinese printing, in which over 4000 characters are required. It was necessary to represent at least 408 sounds, and each one was given a corresponding Braille number. When a pupil reads the number he knows instantly the sound for which it stands. A school for the blind was established at Peking, and the version of the Scriptures printed at Peking can be read in all the provinces where the Northern Mandarin dialect is spoken (see Miss Gordon Cumming, The Inventor of the Numeral Type for China). A Braille code has recently been arranged for Mandarin, based on a system of initials and finals, by Miss Garland of the China Inland Mission. At Foochow there is a large school for boys and girls in connexion with the Church Missionary Society. At Ningpo, Amoy, Canton and Fukien work for the blind is carried on by the missionaries.
Blindness is very common in China, and in addition to eye diseases, neglect, and dirt, leprosy and smallpox also contribute to the issue. Blind beggars can be seen on every road, asking for money. Like in India, their sad situation caught the attention of missionaries. W.H. Murray, a Scottish missionary in Beijing, created a straightforward and clever adaptation of the Braille symbols for the complex system of Chinese printing, which requires over 4,000 characters. It was necessary to represent at least 408 sounds, and each one was assigned a corresponding Braille number. When a student reads the number, they immediately know the sound it represents. A school for the blind was established in Beijing, and the version of the Scriptures printed there can be read in all the provinces where the Northern Mandarin dialect is spoken (see Miss Gordon Cumming, The Inventor of the Numeral Type for China). Recently, a Braille code for Mandarin has been developed based on a system of initials and finals by Miss Garland of the China Inland Mission. In Fuzhou, there is a large school for boys and girls associated with the Church Missionary Society. Missionaries are also working for the blind in Ningbo, Xiamen, Guangzhou, and Fujian.
The blind in Japan have long been trained in massage, acupuncture and music, and until recently, with few exceptions, none but the blind engaged in these occupations. From three to five years are required to become proficient in massage, but a Japan. blind person is then able to support himself. In Yokohama, with a population of half a million, there are 1000 men and women engaged in massage, and all but about 100 of these are blind. In 1878 a school for the blind and deaf-mutes was established in Kyoto, and soon after one in Tokyo. Japan has four schools for the blind, and seven combined schools for the blind and deaf-mutes.
The blind in Japan have been trained in massage, acupuncture, and music for a long time, and until recently, with a few exceptions, only blind individuals worked in these fields. It takes about three to five years to become skilled in massage, but a blind person can then support themselves. In Yokohama, which has a population of half a million, there are 1,000 men and women working in massage, and almost all of them, around 900, are blind. In 1878, a school for the blind and deaf-mutes was opened in Kyoto, followed by another one in Tokyo. Japan has four schools specifically for the blind and seven combined schools for the blind and deaf-mutes.
As in other Eastern countries, blindness is very prevalent in Palestine. Ophthalmic hospitals and medical attendance are now Palestine. available in the larger towns, and the missionary schools have done much to inculcate habits of cleanliness, therefore there is a slight decrease in the number of the blind. The home and school for blind girls in Jerusalem is the outcome of a day school opened in 1896 by an American missionary. There is also a small school at Urfa under the auspices of the American mission in that town.
As in other Eastern countries, blindness is quite common in Palestine. Eye hospitals and medical care are now available in the larger towns, and the missionary schools have contributed significantly to promoting cleanliness, leading to a slight decrease in the number of blind individuals. The home and school for blind girls in Jerusalem originated from a day school that an American missionary opened in 1896. There is also a small school in Urfa supported by the American mission in that area.
Education
Learning
As more sensations are received through the eye than through any other organ, the mind of a blind child is vacant, and the training should begin early or the mind will degenerate. Indirectly the loss of sight results in inaction. If no Early training. one encourages a blind child to move, he will sit quietly in a corner, and when he leaves his seat will move timidly about. This want of activity produces bad physical effects, and further delays mental growth. The blind are often injured, some of them ruined for life, through the ignorance and mistaken kindness of their friends during early childhood. They should be taught to walk, to go up and down stairs, to wash, dress and feed themselves.
Since more sensations come through the eye than any other sense, a blind child's mind can feel empty, and training needs to start early; otherwise, their mental development might decline. The loss of sight can lead to a lack of action. If nobody encourages a blind child to move, they'll just sit quietly in a corner and, when they do get up, they'll move around hesitantly. This lack of activity can harm their physical health and slow down their mental growth. The blind often suffer injuries, and some may be left severely impaired for life due to the ignorance and misguided kindness of their friends and family during early childhood. They should be taught how to walk, go up and down stairs, and take care of personal tasks like washing, dressing, and feeding themselves.
They should be carefully taught correct postures and attitudes, and to avoid making grimaces. They should be told the requirements of social conventions which a seeing child learns through watching his elders. They have no consciousness that their habits are disagreeable, and the earlier unsightly mannerisms are corrected the better. It is a fallacy to suppose that the other senses of the blind are naturally sharper than those of the seeing. It is only when the senses of hearing and touch have been cultivated that they partially replace sight, and such cultivation can begin with very young children.
They should be carefully taught the right postures and attitudes and to avoid making weird faces. They should learn about social norms that a sighted child picks up by observing their adults. They aren't aware that their habits can be unpleasant, so it's best to correct any unattractive mannerisms as early as possible. It's a misconception to think that the other senses of blind people are naturally better than those of sighted people. It's only when hearing and touch are developed that they can partially make up for the lack of sight, and this development can start when children are very young.
Blind children have a stronger claim upon the public for education than other children, because they start at a disadvantage in life, they carry a burden in their infirmity, they come mostly of poor parents, and without special instruction and training they are almost certain to become a public charge during life.
Blind children have a stronger claim on society for education than other children because they start at a disadvantage in life. They bear the burden of their disability, often come from low-income families, and without specialized instruction and training, they are highly likely to become a financial burden on the public throughout their lives.
Public authorities should adopt the most efficient plan for preparing blind children to become active, independent men and women, rather than consider the cheapest and easiest method of educating them. We cannot afford to give the blind an education that is not the best of its kind in the trade or profession they will have to follow. There are many seeing persons with little education who are useful citizens and successful in various industries, but an uneducated blind person is helpless, and must become dependent.
Public authorities should adopt the most effective strategy for preparing blind children to become active, independent adults, instead of just looking for the cheapest and easiest way to educate them. We can't afford to provide the blind with an education that isn't the best available for the careers they'll pursue. There are many sighted individuals with minimal education who are valuable citizens and succeed in different industries, but an uneducated blind person is vulnerable and will have to rely on others.
The surroundings of the blind do not favour the development of activity, self-reliance and independence. Parents and friends find it easier to attend to the wants and requirements of their blind children than to teach them to be self-helpful in the common acts of everyday life. A mistaken kindness leads the friends to guard every movement and prevent physical exertion. As a rule, the vitality of the blind is much below the average vitality of seeing persons, and any system of education which does not recognize and overcome this defect will be a failure. It is the lack of energy and determination, not the want of sight, that causes so many failures among the blind.
The environment around blind individuals doesn't support the growth of activity, self-sufficiency, and independence. Parents and friends often find it easier to cater to the needs of their blind children rather than teach them how to take care of themselves in daily activities. A misguided sense of kindness causes friends to monitor every movement and restrict physical activity. Generally, blind individuals have lower energy levels compared to sighted people, and any educational approach that doesn't address and overcome this issue is likely to fail. It's the lack of energy and determination, not the absence of sight, that leads to many setbacks for blind individuals.
A practical system of education, which has for its object to make the blind independent and self-sustaining, must be based upon a comprehensive course of physical development. Physical training. A blind man who has received mechanical training, general education, or musical instruction, without physical development, is like an engine provided with everything necessary except motive power.
A practical education system aimed at making blind individuals independent and self-sufficient needs to focus on a well-rounded approach to physical development. Fitness training. A blind person who has gotten mechanical training, general education, or music lessons without physical development is like a machine that's equipped with everything but the power to run.
Schools for the blind should be provided with well-equipped gymnasia, and the physical training should include various kinds of mass and apparatus work. Large and suitable playgrounds are also essential. Besides a free space where they can run and play, it should have a supply of swings, tilts, jumping-boards, stilts, chars-à-bancs, skittle-alleys, &c. Any game that allows of sides being taken adds greatly to the enjoyment, and is a powerful incentive to play. The pupils should be encouraged to enter into various competitions, as walking, running, jumping, leap-frog, sack-racing, shot-pitching, tug-of-war, &c. Cycling, rowing, swimming and roller-skating are not only beneficial but most enjoyable.
Schools for the blind should be equipped with modern gyms, and physical training should include different types of group activities and equipment. It's also essential to have large and appropriate playgrounds. In addition to an open space for running and playing, there should be swings, seesaws, jumping boards, stilts, benches, bowling alleys, and more. Any game where teams can compete significantly enhances enjoyment and serves as a strong motivation to play. Students should be encouraged to participate in various competitions, like walking, running, jumping, leapfrog, sack races, shot putting, tug-of-war, etc. Activities like cycling, rowing, swimming, and roller skating are not only beneficial but also a lot of fun.
The subjects in the school curriculum should be varied according to the age and capacity of the pupils, but those which cultivate the powers of observation and the perceptive faculties should have a first place. Object Mental training. lessons or nature study should have a large share of attention. Few people realize that a blind child knows nothing of the size, shape and appearance of common objects that lie beyond the reach of his arm. When he has once been shown how to learn their characteristics, he will go on acquiring a knowledge of his surroundings unaided by a teacher. Again, a careful drill in mental arithmetic, combining accuracy with rapidity, is essential. A good command of English should be cultivated by frequent exercises in composition, and by committing to memory passages of standard prose and poetry. In his secondary course, the choice of subjects must depend upon his future career. Above all, stimulate a love of good reading.
The subjects in the school curriculum should be diverse based on the age and abilities of the students, but those that develop observation skills and perception should take priority. Object Mind training. lessons or nature study should receive significant attention. Few people realize that a blind child is unaware of the size, shape, and appearance of everyday objects that they cannot reach. Once shown how to learn their traits, they will continue to gain knowledge about their environment without needing a teacher. Additionally, thorough practice in mental math, focusing on both accuracy and speed, is crucial. A strong command of English should be developed through regular writing exercises and memorizing passages from classic prose and poetry. In secondary education, the selection of subjects should align with their future career aspirations. Most importantly, foster a love for good reading.
From the earliest years manual dexterity should be cultivated by kindergarten work, modelling, sewing, knitting and sloyd. Blind children who have not had the advantage of Early manual training. this early handwork find much more difficulty when they begin a regular course in technical training. Early manual training cultivates the perceptive faculties, gives activity to the body, and prepares the hands and finger for pianoforte-playing, pianoforte-tuning and handicrafts.
From a young age, manual skills should be developed through activities like kindergarten projects, crafting, sewing, knitting, and woodworking. Blind children who haven't had the benefit of Early hands-on training. this type of early handwork face more challenges when they start a regular technical training program. Early manual training enhances perceptive abilities, energizes the body, and prepares the hands and fingers for playing the piano, tuning the piano, and various crafts.
Besides a good general education, the blind must have careful and detailed training in some handicraft, or thorough preparation for some profession. The trades and professions open to them are few, and if they fail in one of these they Choice of occupation cannot turn quickly to some other line of work. Those who have charge of their education should avail themselves of the knowledge that has been gained in all countries, in order to decide wisely in regard to the trade or occupation for which each pupil should be prepared. It may be some kind of handicraft, pianoforte-tuning, school-teaching, or the profession of music; the talent and ability of each child should be carefully considered before finally deciding his future occupation. The failure to give the blind a practical education often means dependence through life.
Besides a solid general education, blind individuals need careful and detailed training in a specific craft or thorough preparation for a profession. The trades and professions available to them are limited, and if they don’t succeed in one of these, they can’t quickly switch to another line of work. Those responsible for their education should use the knowledge gained in various countries to make informed decisions about the trade or occupation each student should prepare for. It could be a type of craft, piano tuning, teaching, or a career in music; the talents and abilities of each child should be taken into account before deciding on their future occupation. Failing to provide blind individuals with practical education often results in lifelong dependency.
Pianoforte-tuning as an employment for the blind originated in Paris. About 1830 Claud Montal and a blind fellow-pupil attempted to tune a piano. The seeing tuner in charge of the school pianos complained to the director, and Pianoforte-tuning. they were forbidden to touch the works, but the two friends procured an old piano and continued their efforts. Finally, the director, convinced of their skill, gave them charge of all the school pianos, and classes were soon started for the other pupils. When Montal left the institution he encountered great prejudice, but his skill in tuning became known to the professors of the Conservatoire, and his work rapidly increased and success was assured. Montal afterwards established a manufactory, and remained at its head for many years. Tuning is an excellent employment for the blind, and one in which they have certain advantages. The seeing who excel in the business go through a long apprenticeship, and one must give the blind even more careful preparation. They must work a number of hours daily, under suitable tuition, for several years. After a careful examination by an expert pianoforte-tuning authority, every duly qualified tuner should be furnished with an official certificate of proficiency, and tuners who cannot take the required examinations ought not to be allowed to impose upon the public.
Piano tuning as a job for the blind started in Paris. Around 1830, Claud Montal and a blind classmate tried to tune a piano. The sighted tuner responsible for the school's pianos complained to the director, and Piano tuning. they were told not to touch the instruments. However, the two friends found an old piano and kept working on it. Eventually, the director, convinced of their ability, put them in charge of all the school pianos, and classes for other students were quickly established. When Montal left the institution, he faced a lot of prejudice, but his tuning skills caught the attention of the professors at the Conservatory, leading to an increase in his work and solid success. Montal later set up a factory and led it for many years. Tuning is a great job for the blind, and they have certain advantages in this field. Sighted people who excel in tuning go through a long training period, and blind tuners require even more thorough preparation. They need to practice for several hours each day, under appropriate guidance, for several years. After a thorough evaluation by an expert in piano tuning, every qualified tuner should receive an official certificate of proficiency, and those who can’t pass the necessary exams shouldn’t be allowed to mislead the public.
Music in its various branches, when properly taught, is the best and most lucrative employment for the blind. To become successful in the profession, it is necessary for the blind to have opportunities of instruction, practice, Musical training. study, and hearing music equal to those afforded the seeing, with whom they will have to compete in the open market. If the blind musician is to rise above mediocrity, systematic musical instruction in childhood is indispensable, and good instruction will avail little unless the practice is under constant and judicious supervision. The musical instruction, in its several branches of harmony, pianoforte, organ and vocal culture, must be addressed to the mind, not merely to the ear. This is the only possible method by which musical training can be made of practical use to the blind. The blind music teacher or organist must have a well-disciplined mind, capable of analysing and dealing with music from an intellectual point of view. If the mental faculties have not been developed and thoroughly disciplined, the blind musician, however well he may play or sing, will be a failure as a teacher. The musical instruction must be more thorough, more analytical, more comprehensive, than corresponding instruction given to seeing persons. In 1871 Dr Armitage published a book on the education and employment of the blind, in which he stated that of the blind musicians trained in the United Kingdom not more than one-half per cent were able to support themselves, whereas of those trained in the Paris school 30% supported themselves fully, and 30% partially, by the profession of music.
Music in its various forms, when taught properly, is the best and most rewarding job for blind individuals. To succeed in this field, blind musicians need access to the same opportunities for instruction, practice, study, and listening to music that sighted individuals have, as they'll be competing in the open market. For a blind musician to excel, systematic musical training during childhood is essential, and effective teaching is of little use unless the practice is under continuous and thoughtful guidance. Musical instruction, covering areas like harmony, piano, organ, and vocal training, should target the mind, not just the ear. This is the only way musical training can be truly beneficial for the blind. A blind music teacher or organist must have a well-trained mind capable of analyzing and understanding music intellectually. If their mental skills aren’t developed and disciplined, a blind musician, no matter how well they can play or sing, will struggle as a teacher. The musical training provided must be more in-depth, more analytical, and more comprehensive than what is offered to sighted individuals. In 1871, Dr. Armitage published a book about the education and employment of blind people, where he noted that of the blind musicians trained in the UK, only about half a percent could support themselves, while in the Paris school, 30% were fully self-sufficient and another 30% were partially supported by their music careers.
To provide a better education and improve the musical training of the blind, the Royal Normal College was established in 1872.3 Its object was to afford the young blind a thorough general and musical education, to qualify Royal Normal College. them to earn a living by various intellectual pursuits, especially as organists, pianists, teachers and pianoforte-tuners. From the first, the founders of the college maintained that the blind could only be made self-sustaining by increasing their intelligence, bodily activity and dexterity, by inculcating business habits, by arousing their self-respect, and by creating in their minds a belief in the possibility 68 of future self-maintenance. A kindergarten department was opened in 1881. In July 1896 Queen’s Scholarship examinations were held at the Royal Normal College, for the first time, for blind students, and the institution recognized by the Education Department as a training college for blind school-teachers.
To provide a better education and enhance the musical training of blind individuals, the Royal Normal College was established in 1872.3 Its aim was to give young blind students a comprehensive general and musical education, preparing them to earn a living through various intellectual careers, particularly as organists, pianists, teachers, and piano tuners. From the very beginning, the founders of the college believed that blind individuals could only achieve self-sufficiency by increasing their intelligence, physical activity, and skills, instilling business practices, fostering self-respect, and cultivating a belief in the possibility of future independence. A kindergarten department was started in 1881. In July 1896, Queen’s Scholarship examinations were held at the Royal Normal College for blind students for the first time, and the institution was recognized by the Education Department as a training college for blind school teachers.
From the first day a pupil enters school until he finishes his course of training, care must be taken to implant business habits. Blind children are allowed to be idle and helpless at home; they do not learn to appreciate the value of Educational needs. time, and in after years this is one of the most difficult lessons to inculcate. Having drifted through childhood, they are content to drift through life. The important habits of punctuality, regularity and precision should be cultivated in all the arrangements and requirements. A great effort should be made to lift the blind from pauperism. As soon as pupils enter a school, all semblance of pauper origin should be removed. They must be inspired with a desire for independence and a belief in its possibility. In the public mind blindness has been so long and closely associated with dependence and pauperism that schools for the blind, even the most progressive, have been regarded hitherto as asylums rather than educational establishments. A sad mistake in the training of the blind is the lack of an earnest effort to improve their social condition. The fact that their education has been left to charity has helped to keep them in the ranks of dependents.
From the first day a student starts school until they complete their training, it's crucial to instill good business habits. Blind children often end up idle and helpless at home; they don’t learn to value time, and later in life, this becomes one of the toughest lessons to teach. After drifting through childhood, they are content to drift through life. Important habits such as punctuality, consistency, and precision should be fostered in all activities and expectations. A significant effort should be made to lift the blind out of poverty. As soon as students enter a school, all traces of their impoverished background should be erased. They need to be motivated to seek independence and believe that it’s achievable. In public perception, blindness has been closely linked with dependence and poverty for so long that schools for the blind, even the most forward-thinking, have traditionally been seen more as asylums than educational institutions. A major oversight in the training of blind individuals is the lack of a serious effort to enhance their social situation. The fact that their education has relied on charity has contributed to keeping them in a dependent status.
The question of day-classes versus boarding-schools has been much discussed. It is claimed by some that a blind child gains more independence if kept at home and educated in a school with the seeing. This theory is not verified by practical experience. At home its blindness makes the child an exception, and often it takes little or no part in the active duties of everyday life. Again, in a class of seeing children the blind member is treated as an exception. The memory is cultivated at the expense of the other faculties, and the facility with which it recites in certain subjects causes it to make a false estimate of its attainments. The fundamental principles in different branches are imperfectly understood, from the failure to follow the illustrations of the teacher. In the playgrounds, a few irrepressibles join in active games, but most of the blind children prefer a quiet corner.
The debate over day schools versus boarding schools has been widely discussed. Some argue that a blind child becomes more independent when educated at home in a school with sighted peers. However, this theory isn't supported by real-life experiences. At home, a blind child's disability makes them stand out, and they often participate little or not at all in daily activities. Similarly, in a classroom of sighted children, the blind child is seen as an exception. Their memory may be developed at the expense of other skills, and their ability to recite certain subjects can lead to an inflated sense of their own achievements. They often miss out on grasping the fundamental concepts in different subjects because they can’t fully follow the teacher's examples. On the playground, a few adventurous blind kids join in on active games, but most prefer to hang back in a quiet spot.
For the sake of economy, schools for deaf-mutes and the blind are sometimes united. As the requirements of the two classes are entirely separate and distinct, the union is undesirable, whether for general education or industrial training. The plan was tried in America, but has been given up in most of the states. To meet the difficulty of proper classification with small numbers, blind boys and girls are taught in the same classes. The acquaintances then made lead to intimacy in later years and foster intermarriage among the blind. Intermarriage among the blind is a calamity, both for them and for their children; some who might have been successful business men are to-day begging in the streets in consequence of intermarriage.
For the sake of saving money, schools for deaf-mutes and the blind are sometimes combined. Since the needs of the two groups are completely different, this combination is not ideal for either general education or vocational training. This approach was tried in America but has been abandoned in most states. To address the challenge of correctly classifying small groups, blind boys and girls are taught in the same classes. The friendships formed then often lead to close relationships in later years and encourage intermarriage among the blind. Intermarriage among the blind is a problem, both for them and for their children; some who could have been successful businesspeople are now begging on the streets as a result of intermarriage.
In every school or class there will be a certain number of young blind children who, from neglect, want of food, or other causes, are feeble in body and defective in intellect; such children are a great burden in any class or school, and require special treatment and instruction. Educational authorities should unite and have one or two schools in a healthful locality for mentally defective blind children.
In every school or classroom, there are usually a number of young blind children who, due to neglect, lack of proper nutrition, or other reasons, are physically weak and have developmental challenges. These children can be a significant challenge in any educational setting and need specialized care and teaching. Educational authorities should come together to establish one or two schools in a healthy location specifically for blind children with intellectual disabilities.
More and more, in educational work for the seeing, there is a tendency to specialize, and thus enable each student to have the best possible instruction in the subjects that bear most directly on his future calling. To prepare the blind for self-maintenance, there should be an equally careful study of the ability of each child.
More and more in education for the sighted, there's a trend to specialize, allowing each student to receive the best possible instruction in the subjects that are most relevant to their future careers. To help the blind become self-sufficient, there should be a similarly thorough examination of each child's abilities.
A scheme of education which has for its object to make the blind a self-sustaining class should include: kindergarten schools for children from 5 to 8 years of age; preparatory schools from 8 to 11; intermediate schools from 11 to 14. At 14 an intelligent opinion can be formed in regard to the future career of the pupils. They will fall naturally into the following categories:—(a) A certain number will succeed better in handicraft than in any other calling, and should be drafted into a suitable mechanical school. (b) A few will have special gifts for general business, and should be educated accordingly. (c) A few will have the ability and ambition to prepare for the university, and the special college should afford them the most thorough preparation for the university examinations. (d) Some will have the necessary talent, combined with the requisite character and industry, to succeed in the musical profession; in addition to a liberal education, these should have musical instruction, equal to that given to the seeing, in the best schools of music. (e) Some may achieve excellent success as pianoforte-tuners, and in a pianoforte-tuning school strict business habits should be cultivated, and the same attention to work required as is demanded of seeing workmen in well-regulated pianoforte factories.
A system of education aimed at helping blind individuals become self-sufficient should include: kindergarten for kids aged 5 to 8; preparatory schools for ages 8 to 11; and intermediate schools for ages 11 to 14. By age 14, we can form a clear understanding of the students’ future career paths. They will naturally fit into the following categories:—(a) Some will thrive in skilled trades more than any other profession and should be placed in a suitable vocational school. (b) A few will have special talents for business and should be educated accordingly. (c) A handful will possess the ability and ambition to pursue university studies, and a specialized college should provide them with the best preparation for university entrance exams. (d) Some will have the talent, character, and work ethic needed to make it in the music field; in addition to a well-rounded education, they should receive music instruction comparable to what sighted students get in top music schools. (e) Some may find great success as piano tuners, and a piano tuning school should instill strict business practices and the same level of work discipline expected from sighted workers in well-managed piano factories.
The United Kingdom stands almost alone in allowing the education of the blind to depend upon charity. In the United States, each state government not only makes liberal provision for the education and training of the blind, but most of them provide grounds, buildings and a complete equipment in all departments. Although it costs much more per capita, from £40 to £60 per annum, the blind are as amply provided with the means of education as the seeing. The government of the United States appropriates $10,000 per annum for printing embossed books for the blind. Most of the European countries and the English colonies provide by taxation for the education of the blind.
The United Kingdom is almost unique in allowing the education of blind individuals to rely on charity. In the United States, every state government not only makes generous arrangements for the education and training of blind people, but most also provide land, buildings, and full equipment across all areas. Although it costs significantly more per person, ranging from £40 to £60 each year, blind individuals receive just as much support for their education as those who can see. The U.S. government allocates $10,000 each year for printing embossed books for the blind. Most European countries and English colonies fund the education of the blind through taxation.
Types
Types
The earliest authentic records of tangible letters for the blind describe a plan of engraving the letters upon blocks of wood, the invention of Francesco Lucas, a Spaniard, who dedicated it to Philip II. of Spain in the 16th century. In 1640 Pierre Moreau, a writing-master in Paris, cast a movable leaden type for the use of the blind, but being without means to carry out his plan, abandoned it. Pins inserted in cushions were next tried, and large wooden letters. After these came a contrivance of Du Puiseaux, a blind man, who had metal letters cast and set them in a small frame with a handle. Whilst these experiments were going on in France, attempts had also been made in Germany. R. Weissembourg (a resident of Mannheim), who lost his sight when about seven years of age, made use of letters cut in cardboard, and afterwards pricked maps in the same material. By this method he taught Mlle Paradis, the talented blind musician and the friend of Valentin Haüy.
The earliest real records of tangible letters for the blind describe a method of engraving letters on wooden blocks, invented by Francesco Lucas, a Spaniard who dedicated it to Philip II of Spain in the 16th century. In 1640, Pierre Moreau, a writing teacher in Paris, created movable lead type for the blind, but he couldn’t secure the resources to develop his idea and had to abandon it. Next, they experimented with pins inserted in cushions and large wooden letters. Then came an invention by Du Puiseaux, a blind man, who had metal letters cast and arranged them in a small frame with a handle. While these experiments were happening in France, there were also attempts in Germany. R. Weissembourg, a resident of Mannheim who lost his sight around the age of seven, used letters cut from cardboard and later created raised maps in the same material. This method allowed him to teach Mlle Paradis, the talented blind musician and friend of Valentin Haüy.
To Haüy belongs the honour of being the first to emboss paper as a means of reading for the blind; his books were embossed in large and small italics, from movable type set by his pupils. The following is an account of the origin of his discovery. Haüy’s first pupil was François Lesueur, a blind boy whom he found begging at the porch door of St Germain des Prés. While Lesueur was sorting the papers on his teacher’s desk, he came across a card strongly indented by the types in the press. The blind lad showed his master he could decipher several letters on the card. Immediately Haüy traced with the handle of his pen some signs on paper. The boy read them, and the result was printing in relief, the greatest of Haüy’s discoveries. In 1821 Lady Elizabeth Lowther brought embossed books and types from Paris, and with the types her son, Sir Charles Lowther, Bart., printed for his own use the Gospel of St Matthew. The work of Haüy was taken up by Mr Gall of Edinburgh, Mr Alston of Glasgow, Dr Howe of Boston, Mr Friedlander of Philadelphia, and others. In 1827 James Gall of Edinburgh embossed some elementary works, and published the Gospel of St John in 1834. His plan was to use the common English letter and replace curves by angles.
Haüy is credited with being the first to emboss paper for reading by the blind; his books were embossed in both large and small italics from movable type set by his students. Here’s how his discovery came about. Haüy's first student was François Lesueur, a blind boy he found begging at the door of St Germain des Prés. While Lesueur was sorting through the papers on his teacher’s desk, he found a card that was deeply indented by the types in the press. The blind boy demonstrated to his teacher that he could read several letters on the card. Haüy then traced some symbols on paper with the handle of his pen. The boy read them, leading to the invention of relief printing, Haüy's greatest discovery. In 1821, Lady Elizabeth Lowther brought embossed books and types from Paris, and her son, Sir Charles Lowther, Bart., used those types to print the Gospel of St Matthew for himself. Haüy's work was continued by Mr. Gall of Edinburgh, Mr. Alston of Glasgow, Dr. Howe of Boston, Mr. Friedlander of Philadelphia, and others. In 1827, James Gall of Edinburgh embossed some beginner books and published the Gospel of St John in 1834. His approach was to use the standard English letter and replace curves with angles.
![]() |
Fig. 1.—Moon Alphabet. |
In 1832 the Edinburgh Society of Arts offered a gold medal for the best method of printing for the blind, and it was awarded to Dr Edmond Fry of London, whose alphabet consisted of ordinary capital letters without their small strokes. In 1836 the Rev. W. Taylor of York and John Alston in Glasgow began to print with Fry’s type. Mr Alston’s appeal for a printing fund met with a hearty response, and a grant of £400 was made by the treasury; 69 in 1838 he completed the New Testament, and at the end of 1840 the whole Bible was published in embossed print. In 1833 printing for the blind was commenced in the United States at Boston and Philadelphia. Dr S.G. Howe in Boston used small English letters without capitals, angles being employed instead of curves, while J.R. Friedlander in Philadelphia used only Roman capitals. About 1838 T.M. Lucas of Bristol, a shorthand writer, and J.H. Frere of Blackheath, each introduced an alphabet of simpler forms, and based their systems on stenography. In 1847 Dr Moon of Brighton brought out a system which partially retains the outline of the Roman letters. This type is easily read by the adult blind, and is still much used by the home teaching societies. The preceding methods are all known as line types, but the one which is now in general use is a point type.
In 1832, the Edinburgh Society of Arts offered a gold medal for the best method of printing for the blind, and it was awarded to Dr. Edmond Fry of London, whose alphabet consisted of regular capital letters without their small strokes. In 1836, the Rev. W. Taylor of York and John Alston in Glasgow started printing with Fry’s type. Mr. Alston’s appeal for a printing fund received enthusiastic support, leading to a grant of £400 from the treasury; 69 in 1838, he completed the New Testament, and by the end of 1840, the entire Bible was published in embossed print. In 1833, printing for the blind began in the United States in Boston and Philadelphia. Dr. S.G. Howe in Boston used small English letters without capitals, employing angles instead of curves, while J.R. Friedlander in Philadelphia used only Roman capitals. Around 1838, T.M. Lucas of Bristol, a shorthand writer, and J.H. Frere of Blackheath each introduced an alphabet with simpler forms, basing their systems on stenography. In 1847, Dr. Moon of Brighton released a system that partially retains the outline of Roman letters. This type is easily read by adults who are blind and continues to be widely used by home teaching societies. The earlier methods are all known as line types, but the one that's now commonly used is a point type.
In the early part of the 19th century Captain Charles Barbier, a French officer, substituted embossed dots for embossed lines. The slate for writing was also invented by him.
In the early 19th century, Captain Charles Barbier, a French officer, replaced embossed lines with embossed dots. He also invented the slate for writing.
![]() |
Apparatus for writing Braille. |
![]() |
Braille Alphabet. The black dots represent the raised points of
the sign in their position in relation to the group of six. Fig. 2. |
Barbier arranged a table of speech sounds, consisting of six lines with six sounds in each line. His rectangular cell contained two vertical rows of six points each. The number of points in the left-hand row indicates in which horizontal line, and that in the right-hand row in which vertical line, of the printed table the speech sound is to be found.
Barbier set up a table of speech sounds, featuring six rows with six sounds in each row. His rectangular grid had two vertical columns, each with six dots. The number of dots in the left column shows which horizontal row, and the number in the right column indicates which vertical row of the printed table the speech sound can be found.
Louis Braille, a pupil and afterwards a professor of the Institution Nationale des Jeunes Aveugles, Paris, studied all the various methods in which arbitrary characters were used. Barbier’s letter, although it gave a large number of combinations, was too long to be covered by the finger in reading, and Louis Braille reduced the number of dots. In 1834 Braille perfected his system. Dr Armitage considered it was the greatest advance that had ever been made in the education of the blind.
Louis Braille, a student and later a teacher at the National Institute for Young Blind People in Paris, explored all the different ways arbitrary characters were used. Barbier's letter, while it offered many combinations, was too lengthy for fingers to read easily, so Louis Braille reduced the number of dots. In 1834, Braille refined his system. Dr. Armitage believed it was the biggest breakthrough ever achieved in the education of blind individuals.
The Braille alphabet consists of varying combinations of six
dots in an oblong, of which the vertical side contains three, and the
horizontal two dots . There are 63 possible combinations
of these six dots, and after the letters of the alphabet have been
supplied, the remaining signs are used for punctuation, contractions,
&c.
The Braille alphabet is made up of different combinations of six dots arranged in an oblong shape, with three dots on the vertical side and two on the horizontal side . There are 63 possible combinations of these six dots. After the letters of the alphabet are accounted for, the remaining symbols are used for punctuation, contractions, etc.
“For writing, a ruler is used, consisting of a metal bed either grooved or marked by groups of little pits, each group consisting of six; over this bed is fitted a brass guide, punched with oblong holes whose vertical diameter is three-tenths of an inch, while the horizontal diameter is two-tenths. The pits are arranged in two parallel lines, and the guide is hinged on the bed in such a way that when the two are locked together the openings in the guide correspond exactly to the pits in the bed. The brass guide has a double row of openings, which enables the writer to write two lines; when these are written, he shifts his guide downwards until two little pins, which project from the under surface at its ends, drop into corresponding holes of a wooden board; then two more lines are written, and this operation is repeated until the bottom of the page is reached. The paper is introduced between the frame and the metal bed. The instrument for writing is a blunt awl, which carries a little cap of paper before it into the grooves or pits of the bed, thereby producing a series of little pits in the paper on the side next the writer. When taken out and turned over, little prominences are felt, corresponding to the pits on the other side. The reading is performed from left to right, consequently the writing is from right to left; but this reversal presents no practical difficulty as soon as the pupil had caught the idea that in reading and writing alike he has to go forwards.
“For writing, a ruler is used, made of a metal base that is either grooved or marked by groups of small indentations, with each group containing six. Above this base is a brass guide, fitted with oblong holes, where the vertical diameter measures three-tenths of an inch and the horizontal diameter measures two-tenths. The indentations are arranged in two parallel lines, and the guide is hinged to the base in such a way that when they are locked together, the openings in the guide align perfectly with the indentations in the base. The brass guide has two rows of openings, allowing the writer to create two lines; once these lines are written, the guide is slid down until two little pins at its ends fit into corresponding holes in a wooden board. Then, two more lines can be written, and this process continues until the bottom of the page is reached. The paper is placed between the frame and the metal base. The writing tool is a blunt awl, which pushes a small piece of paper into the grooves or indentations of the base, creating a series of tiny indentations on the side of the paper facing the writer. When the paper is removed and flipped over, little raised spots are felt, which correspond to the indentations on the opposite side. Reading is done from left to right, so writing is from right to left; however, this reversal isn’t an issue once the student understands that both reading and writing require moving forwards.
“The first ten letters, from ‘a’ to ‘j,’ are formed in the upper and middle grooves; the next ten, from ‘k’ to ‘t,’ are formed by adding one lower back dot to each letter of the first series; the third row is formed from the first by adding two lower dots to each letter; the fourth row, similarly, by adding one lower front dot.
“The first ten letters, from ‘a’ to ‘j,’ are made in the upper and middle grooves; the next ten, from ‘k’ to ‘t,’ are created by adding one lower back dot to each letter of the first series; the third row is formed from the first by adding two lower dots to each letter; the fourth row, similarly, is made by adding one lower front dot.”
“The first ten letters, when preceded by the prefix for numbers, stand for the nine numbers and the cipher. The same signs, written in the lower and middle grooves, instead of the upper and middle, serve for punctuation. The seven last letters of each series stand for the seven musical notes—the first series representing quavers, the second minims, the third semibreves, the fourth crotchets. Rests, accidentals, and every other sign used in music can be readily and clearly expressed without having recourse to the staff of five lines which forms the basis of ordinary musical notation, and which, though it has been reproduced tor the blind, can only be considered as serving to give them an idea of the method employed by the seeing, and cannot, of course, be written. By means of this dotted system, a blind man is able to keep memoranda or accounts, write his own music, emboss his own books from dictation, and carry on correspondence.”
“The first ten letters, when followed by the prefix for numbers, represent the nine digits and the zero. The same symbols, written in the lower and middle grooves instead of the upper and middle, are used for punctuation. The last seven letters of each series represent the seven musical notes—the first series for eighth notes, the second for quarter notes, the third for half notes, and the fourth for whole notes. Rests, accidentals, and every other symbol used in music can be easily and clearly expressed without relying on the five-line staff that forms the basis of standard musical notation, which, although it has been adapted for the blind, can only be seen as a way to give them a general idea of the method used by sighted people and obviously cannot be written. With this dotted system, a blind person can keep notes or accounts, write their own music, emboss their books from dictation, and maintain correspondence.”
The Braille system for literature and music was brought into general use in England by Dr T.R. Armitage. Through his wise, 70 untiring zeal and noble generosity, every blind man, woman and child throughout the English-speaking world can now obtain not only the best literature, but the best music.
The Braille system for literature and music became widely used in England thanks to Dr. T.R. Armitage. Through his wise, untiring efforts and generous spirit, every blind man, woman, and child in the English-speaking world can now access not just the best literature, but also the best music.
In America there are two modifications of the point type, known as New York point and American braille. In each of these the most frequently recurring letters are represented by the least number of dots.
In America, there are two versions of the point type, known as New York point and American braille. In both of these, the most commonly used letters are represented by the fewest number of dots.
The original Braille is used by the institutions for the blind in the British empire, European countries, Mexico, Brazil and Egypt.
The original Braille is used by organizations for the blind in the British Empire, European countries, Mexico, Brazil, and Egypt.
Appliances for Educational Work
Tools for Learning
The apparatus for writing point alphabets has already been described. Frank H. Hall, former superintendent of the School for the Blind, Jacksonville, Ill., U.S.A., has invented a Braille typewriter and stereotype maker; the latter embosses metal plates from which any number of copies can be printed. An automatic Braille-writer has been brought out in Germany, and William B. Wait (principal of the Institution for the Blind in New York City) has invented a machine for writing New York point. These machines are expensive, but A. Wayne of Birmingham has brought out a cheap and effective Braille-writer. H. Stainsby, secretary of the Birmingham institution, and Wayne have invented a machine for writing Braille shorthand.
The device for writing point alphabets has already been discussed. Frank H. Hall, the former superintendent of the School for the Blind in Jacksonville, Illinois, U.S.A., has created a Braille typewriter and a stereotype maker; the latter embosses metal plates that can be used to print multiple copies. An automatic Braille writer has been developed in Germany, and William B. Wait (the principal of the Institution for the Blind in New York City) has invented a machine for writing New York point. These machines are pricey, but A. Wayne from Birmingham has introduced a budget-friendly and efficient Braille writer. H. Stainsby, the secretary of the Birmingham institution, along with Wayne, has created a machine for writing Braille shorthand.
![]() |
Fig. 3.—Arithmetic Board, Pin and Characters. A, Shape of opening in the board for pin; B and C, pin. |
Many boards have been constructed to enable the blind to work arithmetical problems. The one which is most used was invented by the Rev. W. Taylor. The board has star-shaped openings in which a square pin fits in eight different positions. The pin has on one end a plain ridge and on the other a notched ridge; sixteen characters can be formed with the two ends. The board is also used for algebra, another set of type furnishing the algebraic symbols.
Many boards have been created to help blind people solve math problems. The most commonly used one was invented by Rev. W. Taylor. The board has star-shaped openings that allow a square pin to fit in eight different positions. One end of the pin has a plain ridge, while the other has a notched ridge, enabling the formation of sixteen different characters with the two ends. The board is also used for algebra, with a different set of types providing the algebraic symbols.
Books are prepared with raised geometrical diagrams; figures can be formed with bent wires on cushions, or on paper with a toothed wheel attached to one end of a pair of compasses.
Books are created with raised geometric diagrams; shapes can be made using bent wires on cushions, or on paper with a toothed wheel connected to one end of a pair of compasses.
Geography is studied by means of relief maps, manufactured in wood or paper. The physical maps and globes prepared for seeing children are used also for the blind.
Geography is studied using relief maps made of wood or paper. The physical maps and globes designed for sighted children are also used by blind students.
Chiefly owing to the unremitting energy and liberality of Dr T.R. Armitage, in connexion with the British and Foreign Blind Association, all school appliances for the blind have been greatly improved and cheapened.
Thanks to the tireless efforts and generosity of Dr. T.R. Armitage, in connection with the British and Foreign Blind Association, all educational tools for the blind have seen significant improvements and reductions in cost.
Employment
Job
Reference has been made to the fact that music in its various branches furnishes the best and most lucrative employment for the blind. But those who have not the ability, or are too old to be trained for music or some other profession, must depend upon handicrafts for their support. The principal ones taught in the various institutions are the making of baskets, brushes, mats, sacks, ships’ fenders, brooms and mattresses, upholstery, wire-work, chair-caning, wood-chopping, &c. Females are taught to make fancy baskets and brushes, chair-caning, knitting, netting, weaving, sewing—hand and machine—crocheting, &c. It is difficult to find employment for blind girls. It is hoped that typewriting and massage will prove remunerative.
Reference has been made to the fact that music in its various branches provides the best and most profitable jobs for the blind. But those who lack the talent or are too old to be trained in music or another profession must rely on crafts for their livelihood. The main skills taught in various institutions include making baskets, brushes, mats, sacks, ship fenders, brooms, mattresses, upholstery, wire work, chair caning, wood chopping, etc. Women are taught to make decorative baskets and brushes, chair caning, knitting, netting, weaving, sewing—both by hand and machine—crocheting, and more. It is challenging to find jobs for blind girls. There’s hope that typewriting and massage will turn out to be profitable.
The blind, whether educated for the church, trained as teachers, musicians, pianoforte-tuners, or for any other trade or occupation, generally require assistance at the outset. They need help in finding suitable employment, recommendations for establishing a connexion, pecuniary assistance in providing outfits of books, tools, instruments, &c., help in the selection and purchase of the best materials at the lowest wholesale rates, in the sale of their manufactured goods in the best markets, and if overtaken by reverses, judicious and timely help towards a fresh start. Every institution should keep in touch with its old pupils. The superintendent who carefully studies the successes and failures of his pupils when they go into the world, will more wisely direct the work and energies of his present and future students.
The blind, whether trained for the church, prepared as teachers, musicians, piano tuners, or for any other job, usually need support at the beginning. They require help in finding suitable work, recommendations for building connections, financial assistance for acquiring books, tools, instruments, etc., guidance in selecting and purchasing the best materials at the lowest wholesale prices, help selling their products in the best markets, and if they face setbacks, thoughtful and timely support to make a fresh start. Every institution should stay in touch with its former students. The superintendent who closely observes the successes and failures of his former students as they enter the real world will be better equipped to direct the work and efforts of his current and future students.
Within recent years great improvements have been made in some of the progressive workshops for the blind. At the conference in London in 1902 Mr T. Stoddart gave the following information in regard to the work in Glasgow:—“We are building very extensive additions to our workshops, which will enable us to accommodate 600 blind people. We mean to employ the most up-to-date methods, and are introducing electric power to drive the machinery and light the workshops. We have to do with the average blind adult recently deprived of sight after he has attained an age of from 25 to 40 or even 50 years. In Glasgow we have developed an industry eminently suitable for the employment of the blind, namely, the manufacture of new and the remaking of old bedding. There are industries which are purely local, where certain articles of manufacture largely used in one district are useless, or nearly so, in another; but the field in which this industry may be promoted is practically without limit. It is perhaps the employment par excellence for the blind, and among other advantages it has the following to recommend it: employment is provided for the blind of both sexes and of all ages; there is no accumulation nor deterioration of stock; it yields an excellent profit, and its use is universal. We have been pushing this industry for years, our annual turnover in this particular department having exceeded £7000, and as we find it so suited to the capabilities of all grades of blind people, it is our intention to provide facilities for doing a turnover of three times that amount. Instead of the thirty sewing-machines which we have at present running by power, we hope to employ 100 blind women. At cork-fender-making, also an industry of the most suitable kind, we are at present employing about thirty workers. It is also our intention to greatly develop and extend our mat-making department.”
In recent years, significant improvements have been made in some of the progressive workshops for the blind. At the conference in London in 1902, Mr. T. Stoddart shared the following information about the work in Glasgow: “We are building large expansions to our workshops, which will allow us to accommodate 600 blind individuals. We aim to use the latest methods and are introducing electric power to operate the machinery and light the workshops. We work with average blind adults who have recently lost their sight, typically between the ages of 25 and 50. In Glasgow, we have developed an industry particularly suitable for employing the blind, which is the manufacturing of new bedding and refurbishing of old bedding. There are industries that are solely local, where certain products made in one area are almost useless in another; however, the potential for this industry is virtually unlimited. It is arguably the best employment option for the blind, and it offers several benefits: it provides jobs for blind individuals of all genders and ages; there is no buildup or deterioration of inventory; it generates excellent profits, and its application is universal. We have been promoting this industry for years, with our annual turnover in this area exceeding £7000, and since it aligns so well with the skills of blind individuals of all levels, we intend to facilitate a turnover that is three times that amount. Instead of the thirty sewing machines we currently have in operation, we hope to employ 100 blind women. Additionally, in the cork-fender-making industry, which is also highly suitable, we currently have about thirty workers. We also plan to greatly expand our mat-making department.”
In the United States many blind persons are engaged in agricultural pursuits, and some are very successful in commercial pursuits. When a man loses his sight in adult life, if he can possibly follow the business in which he has previously been engaged, it is the best course for him. In the present day, work in manufactories is subdivided to such an extent that often some one portion can be done by a blind person; but it needs the interest of some enthusiastic believer in the capabilities of the blind to persuade the seeing manager that blind people can be safely employed in factories.
In the United States, many blind individuals are involved in farming, and some are quite successful in business. When a person loses their sight as an adult, continuing in their previous job is usually the best option. Nowadays, work in factories is so specialized that often a blind person can do specific tasks, but it takes the support of someone who truly believes in the abilities of blind people to convince the sighted manager that they can be safely hired in manufacturing settings.
In England, at the time of the royal commission of 1889, upwards of 8000 blind persons, above the age of 21, were in receipt of relief from the guardians, of whom no less than 3278 were resident in workhouses or workhouse infirmaries. The 71 census returns for 1901 indicate that the number at that time was equally large. It would certainly be more economical to establish workshops where the able-bodied adult blind can be trained in some handicraft and employed.
In England, during the royal commission of 1889, more than 8,000 blind individuals over the age of 21 were receiving assistance from the guardians, with at least 3,278 living in workhouses or workhouse infirmaries. The 71 census data from 1901 shows that the number was similarly high at that time. It would definitely be more cost-effective to create workshops where able-bodied adults who are blind can be trained in a craft and employed.
The papers read at the various conferences show that, even under the most favourable circumstances, some are not able to earn enough for their support; nevertheless, employment improves their condition; there is no greater calamity than to live a life of compulsory idleness in total darkness. The cry of the blind is not alms but work. One of the workshops in western America has adopted the motto, “Independence through Industry,” and it should be the aim of every civilized country to hasten the time when blindness and pauperism shall no longer be synonymous terms.
The papers presented at the various conferences show that, even under the best circumstances, some people struggle to earn enough to support themselves; however, having a job improves their situation. There’s no worse tragedy than living a life of forced idleness in complete darkness. What the blind need is not charity but work. One of the workshops in the western United States has adopted the motto, “Independence through Industry,” and every civilized country should strive to speed up the day when blindness and poverty are no longer considered the same thing.
Biography
Bio
It may be interesting, in conclusion, to mention some of the names of prominent blind people in history:—
It might be worth noting, in conclusion, some of the notable blind people throughout history:—
Timoleon (c. 410-336 B.C.), a Greek general.
Timoleon (c. 410-336 BCE), a Greek general.
Aufidius, a Roman senator.
Aufidius, a Roman senator.
Bela II. (d. 1141), king of Hungary.
Bela II (d. 1141), King of Hungary.
John, king of Bohemia (1296-1346), killed in the battle of Crécy.
John, king of Bohemia (1296-1346), was killed in the battle of Crécy.
John Zizca (c. 1376-1424), Bohemian general.
John Zizka (c. 1376-1424), Bohemian general.
Basil III. (d. 1462), prince of Moscow.
Basil III (d. 1462), prince of Moscow.
Shah Alam (d. 1806), the last of the Great Moguls.
Shah Alam (d. 1806), the final ruler of the Great Moguls.
Diodorus, the instructor of Cicero.
Diodorus, Cicero's instructor.
Didymus of Alexandria (c. 308-395), mathematician, theologian and linguist.
Didymus of Alexandria (c. 308-395) was a mathematician, theologian, and linguist.
Nicase of Malines (d. 1492), professor of law in the university of Cologne. The degree of doctor of divinity was conferred on him by the university of Louvain, and the pope granted a dispensation suspending the law of the Church, that he might be ordained as a priest.
Nicase of Malines (d. 1492), a law professor at the University of Cologne, was awarded the degree of Doctor of Divinity by the University of Louvain. The pope issued a dispensation suspending the Church's law so that he could be ordained as a priest.
Ludovico Scapinelli (b. 1585), professor at the universities of Bologna, Modena and Pisa.
Ludovico Scapinelli (b. 1585) was a professor at the universities of Bologna, Modena, and Pisa.
James Schegkius (d. 1587), professor of philosophy and medicine at Tübingen.
James Schegkius (d. 1587), a professor of philosophy and medicine at Tübingen.
Franciscus Salinas, professor of music at the university of Salamanca, in the 16th century.
Franciscus Salinas, a music professor at the University of Salamanca in the 16th century.
Nicholas Bacon (16th century), doctor of laws in the university of Brussels.
Nicholas Bacon (16th century), law doctor at the University of Brussels.
Count de Pagan of Avignon (b. 1604), mathematician of note.
Count de Pagan of Avignon (b. 1604), a notable mathematician.
John Milton (1608-1674), the poet.
John Milton (1608-1674), the poet.
Rev. Richard Lucas (1648-1715), prebendary of Westminster.
Rev. Richard Lucas (1648-1715), a prebendary of Westminster.
Nicholas Saunderson (q.v.; 1682-1739).
Nicholas Saunderson (1682-1739).
John Stanley (1713-1786), Mus. Bac. Oxon., was born in London in 1713. At seven he began to study music, and made such rapid progress that he was appointed organist of All-Hallows, Bread Street, at the age of eleven. He graduated as Mus. Bac. at Oxford when sixteen, and was organist of the Temple church at the age of twenty-one. He composed a number of cantatas, and after the death of Handel he superintended the performance of Handel’s oratorios at Covent Garden. He received the degree of doctor of music, and was master of the king’s band.
John Stanley (1713-1786), Mus. Bac. Oxon., was born in London in 1713. He started studying music at the age of seven and progressed so quickly that he became the organist of All-Hallows, Bread Street, when he was just eleven. He graduated with a Mus. Bac. from Oxford at sixteen and was the organist of the Temple church by twenty-one. He composed several cantatas, and after Handel's death, he oversaw the performance of Handel’s oratorios at Covent Garden. He earned the degree of Doctor of Music and was the master of the king’s band.
Leonard Euler (1707-1783), the celebrated mathematician and astronomer.
Leonard Euler (1707-1783) was a renowned mathematician and astronomer.
John Metcalf (b. 1717), road-builder and contractor.
John Metcalf (b. 1717), road builder and contractor.
Sir John Fielding (d. 1780), eminent lawyer and magistrate.
Sir John Fielding (d. 1780), a renowned lawyer and magistrate.
Thomas Blacklock (q.v.; 1721-1791), Scottish scholar and poet.
Thomas Blacklock (q.v.; 1721-1791), Scottish scholar and poet.
François Huber (1750-1831), Swiss naturalist, noted for his observations on bees.
François Huber (1750-1831), a Swiss naturalist, is known for his observations on bees.
Edward Rushton (b. 1756). At six years of age he entered the Liverpool free grammar school, and at eleven shipped for his first voyage in a West India merchantman. On a later voyage he was shipwrecked, and owed his life to the self-sacrifice of a negro. Rushton and the black man swam for their lives to a floating cask; the negro reached it first, saw Rushton about to sink, pushed the cask to the failing lad, and struck out for the shore, but never reached it. This incident made Rushton an enthusiastic champion through life of the cause of the negro. During a voyage to Dominica malignant ophthalmia broke out among the slave cargo, and Rushton caught the disease by attending them in the hold when all others refused help. This attack deprived him of sight, and cut short a promising nautical career at the age of nineteen. He struggled bravely against difficulties, and besides entering successfully into various literary engagements, maintained himself and family as a bookseller. A volume of his poems containing a memoir was published in 1824.
Edward Rushton (b. 1756). At six, he started attending the Liverpool free grammar school, and by eleven, he set sail on his first journey in a West India merchant ship. On a subsequent voyage, he was shipwrecked and owed his life to the selflessness of a Black man. Rushton and the Black man swam for their lives to a floating barrel; the Black man reached it first, noticed Rushton about to drown, pushed the barrel toward him, and swam for shore, but never made it. This experience turned Rushton into a passionate advocate for the Black community throughout his life. During a trip to Dominica, a severe eye infection broke out among the enslaved people on board, and Rushton contracted the illness while caring for them in the hold when everyone else refused to help. This illness left him blind and ended a promising career at sea when he was just nineteen. He fought bravely against adversity, and in addition to successfully taking on various writing projects, he supported himself and his family as a bookseller. A collection of his poems, which included a memoir, was published in 1824.
Marie Thérèse von Paradis (b. 1759), the daughter of an imperial councillor in Vienna. She was a godchild of the empress Marie Thérèse, and as her parents possessed rank and wealth, no expense was spared in her education. Weissembourg, a blind man, was her tutor, and she learned to spell with letters cut out of pasteboard, and read words pricked upon cards with pins. She studied the piano with Richter (of Holland) and Kozeluch. She was a highly esteemed pianist, and Mozart wrote a concerto for her; she also attained considerable skill on the organ, in singing and in composition. She made a concert tour of Europe, visiting the principal courts and everywhere achieving great success. She remained four months in England, under the patronage of the queen. On her return to Vienna, through Paris, she met Valentin Haüy. Towards the close of her life she devoted herself to teaching singing and the pianoforte with great success.
Marie Thérèse von Paradis (b. 1759) was the daughter of an imperial councillor in Vienna. She was the godchild of Empress Marie Thérèse, and her parents, who were wealthy and of high rank, spared no expense in her education. Weissembourg, a blind man, served as her tutor, and she learned to spell using letters cut from pasteboard and read words that were pricked onto cards with pins. She studied piano with Richter (from Holland) and Kozeluch. She became a well-respected pianist, and Mozart even wrote a concerto for her; she also became quite skilled at playing the organ, singing, and composing. She toured Europe for concerts, performing at major courts and achieving great success wherever she went. She spent four months in England, supported by the queen. On her way back to Vienna, she passed through Paris and met Valentin Haüy. In her later years, she dedicated herself to teaching singing and piano with great success.
James Holman (q.v.; 1786-1857), traveller.
James Holman (see below; 1786-1857), traveler.
William H. Prescott (q.v.; 1796-1859), the American historian.
William H. Prescott (q.v.; 1796-1859), the American historian.
Several early 19th-century musicians held situations as organists in London; among them Grenville, Scott, Lockhart, Mather, Stiles and Warne.
Several early 19th-century musicians held positions as organists in London; among them were Grenville, Scott, Lockhart, Mather, Stiles, and Warne.
Louis Braille (1809-1852). In 1819 he went to the school for the blind in Paris. He became proficient on the organ, and held a post in one of the Paris churches. While a professor at the Institution Nationale des Jeunes Aveugles, he perfected his system of point writing.
Louis Braille (1809-1852). In 1819, he attended the school for the blind in Paris. He became skilled at playing the organ and held a position in one of the churches in Paris. While teaching at the Institution Nationale des Jeunes Aveugles, he refined his system of point writing.
Alexander Rodenbach, Belgian statesman. When a member of the chamber of deputies, in 1836, he introduced and succeeded in establishing by law the right of blind and deaf-mute children to an education.
Alexander Rodenbach, Belgian politician. When he was a member of the chamber of deputies in 1836, he introduced and successfully established by law the right for blind and deaf-mute children to receive an education.
Dr William Moon (1818-1894), the inventor of the type for the blind which bears his name.
Dr. William Moon (1818-1894) was the inventor of the type designed for the blind that carries his name.
Rev. W.H. Milburn, D.D. (1823-1903), the American chaplain, known in the United States as “The Blind Man Eloquent.” He often travelled from thirty to fifty thousand miles a year, speaking and preaching every day. He was three times chaplain of the House of Representatives, and in 1893 was chosen to the chaplaincy of the senate.
Rev. W.H. Milburn, D.D. (1823-1903), the American chaplain, known in the United States as “The Blind Man Eloquent.” He often traveled thirty to fifty thousand miles a year, speaking and preaching every day. He served as chaplain of the House of Representatives three times, and in 1893 he was appointed chaplain of the Senate.
Dr T.R. Armitage (b. 1824). After spending his youth on the continent, he became a medical student, first at King’s College, and afterwards at Paris and Vienna. His career promised to be a brilliant one, but at the age of thirty-six failing sight caused him to abandon his profession. For the rest of his life he devoted his time and fortune to the interests of the blind. He reorganized the Indigent Blind Visiting Society, endowed its Samaritan fund, founded the British and Foreign Blind Association, and, in conjunction with the late duke of Westminster and others, founded the Royal Normal College.
Dr. T.R. Armitage (b. 1824). After spending his youth in Europe, he became a medical student, first at King’s College, and later in Paris and Vienna. His career seemed destined for greatness, but at the age of thirty-six, deteriorating eyesight forced him to leave his profession. For the rest of his life, he dedicated his time and resources to supporting the blind. He restructured the Indigent Blind Visiting Society, funded its Samaritan fund, established the British and Foreign Blind Association, and, along with the late Duke of Westminster and others, founded the Royal Normal College.
Elizabeth Gilbert (b. 1826), daughter of the bishop of Chichester. She lost her sight at the age of three. She was educated at home, and took her full share of household duties and cares and pleasures. When she was twenty-seven, she began to consider the condition of the poor blind of London. She saw some one must befriend those who had been taught trades, some one who could supply material, give employment or dispose of the articles manufactured. In 1854 her scheme was started, and work was given to six men in their own homes, but the number soon increased. In 1856 a committee was formed, a house converted into a factory, and the Association for Promoting the General Welfare of the Blind was founded.
Elizabeth Gilbert (b. 1826), daughter of the bishop of Chichester. She lost her sight at the age of three. She was educated at home and took on her share of household responsibilities and joys. At the age of twenty-seven, she began to think about the situation of the blind poor in London. She realized someone needed to help those who had learned trades—someone who could provide materials, offer jobs, or sell the goods they produced. In 1854, her initiative launched, giving work to six men in their homes, but the number quickly grew. By 1856, a committee was established, a house was converted into a factory, and the Association for Promoting the General Welfare of the Blind was founded.
Rev. George Matheson, D.D. (b. 1842), preacher and writer of the Church of Scotland. The degree of D.D. was conferred on him by the university of Edinburgh in 1879, and he was appointed Baird Lecturer in 1881, and St Giles’ Lecturer in 1882.
Rev. George Matheson, D.D. (b. 1842), preacher and writer for the Church of Scotland. The University of Edinburgh granted him the D.D. degree in 1879, and he was appointed Baird Lecturer in 1881 and St. Giles’ Lecturer in 1882.
Henry Fawcett (1833-1884), professor of political economy at Cambridge, and postmaster-general.
Henry Fawcett (1833-1884), a political economy professor at Cambridge, and the postmaster general.
W.H. Churchman of Pennsylvania, who was instrumental in establishing the schools for the blind in Tennessee, Indiana and Wisconsin.
W.H. Churchman from Pennsylvania played a key role in setting up schools for the blind in Tennessee, Indiana, and Wisconsin.
H.L. Hall, founder of the workshops and home for the blind in Philadelphia; by his energetic management he raised the standard of work for the adult blind throughout America.
H.L. Hall, the founder of the workshops and home for the blind in Philadelphia, elevated the standard of work for adult blind individuals across America through his dynamic leadership.
Bibliography.—See also W.H. Levy, Blindness and the Blind (1872); J. Wilson, Biography of the Blind (1838); Dr T.R. Armitage, Education and Employment of the Blind (2nd ed., 1882); R.H. Blair, Education of the Blind (1868); M. Anagnos, Education of the Blind (1882); H.J. Wilson, Institutions, Societies and Classes for the Blind in England and Wales (1907); Guillié, Instruction and Amusements of the Blind (1819); Dr W. Moon, Light for the Blind (1875); R. Meldrum, Light on Dark Paths (2nd ed., 1891); Dr H. Roth, Prevention of Blindness (1885), and his Physical Education of the Blind (1885); Report of Royal Commission (1889); Gavin Douglas, Remarkable Blind Persons (1829); John Bird, Social Pathology (1862); M. de la Sizeranne, The Blind in Useful Avocations (Paris, 1881), True Mission of Smaller Schools (Paris, 1884), The Blind in France (Paris, 1885), Two Years’ Study and Work for the Blind (Paris, 1890), and The Blind as seen by a Blind Man [translated by Dr Park Lewis] (Paris, 1893); Dr Émile Javal, The Blind 72 Man’s World [translated by Ernest Thomson] (Paris, 1904); Prof. A. Mell, Encyklopadisches Handbuch des Blindenwesens (Vienna, 1899).
References.—See also W.H. Levy, Blindness and the Blind (1872); J. Wilson, Biography of the Blind (1838); Dr T.R. Armitage, Education and Employment of the Blind (2nd ed., 1882); R.H. Blair, Education of the Blind (1868); M. Anagnos, Education of the Blind (1882); H.J. Wilson, Institutions, Societies and Classes for the Blind in England and Wales (1907); Guillié, Instruction and Amusements of the Blind (1819); Dr W. Moon, Light for the Blind (1875); R. Meldrum, Light on Dark Paths (2nd ed., 1891); Dr H. Roth, Prevention of Blindness (1885), and his Physical Education of the Blind (1885); Report of Royal Commission (1889); Gavin Douglas, Remarkable Blind Persons (1829); John Bird, Social Pathology (1862); M. de la Sizeranne, The Blind in Useful Avocations (Paris, 1881), True Mission of Smaller Schools (Paris, 1884), The Blind in France (Paris, 1885), Two Years’ Study and Work for the Blind (Paris, 1890), and The Blind as Seen by a Blind Man [translated by Dr Park Lewis] (Paris, 1893); Dr Émile Javal, The Blind Man’s World [translated by Ernest Thomson] (Paris, 1904); Prof. A. Mell, Encyklopädisches Handbuch des Blindenwesens (Vienna, 1899).
1 There are no late returns for Iceland, but the last available statistics gave 3400 per million. A paper written in 1903 on blindness in Egypt stated that 1 in every 50 of the population was blind.
1 There are no late returns for Iceland, but the latest statistics showed 3,400 per million. A paper written in 1903 on blindness in Egypt noted that 1 in every 50 people was blind.
2 Previous returns from Finland have shown a much larger number of blind persons, but these statistics were supplied by the British consul in St Petersburg from the last census.
2 Previous reports from Finland have indicated a much higher number of blind individuals, but these figures were provided by the British consul in St Petersburg from the latest census.
3 Its principal (responsible, with Dr Armitage, the duke of Westminster and others, for its foundation) was Sir F.J. Campbell, LL.D., F.R.G.S., F.S.A., himself a blind man, who, born in Tennessee, U.S.A., in 1832, and educated at the Nashville school, and afterwards in music at Leipzig and Berlin, had from 1858 to 1869 been associated with Dr Howe at the Perkins Institution, Boston. He was knighted in 1909.
3 Its primary founder (along with Dr. Armitage, the Duke of Westminster, and others) was Sir F.J. Campbell, LL.D., F.R.G.S., F.S.A., who was blind himself. Born in Tennessee, U.S.A., in 1832, and educated at the Nashville school, he later studied music in Leipzig and Berlin. From 1858 to 1869, he worked with Dr. Howe at the Perkins Institution in Boston. He was knighted in 1909.
BLISS, CORNELIUS NEWTON (1833- ), American merchant and politician, was born at Fall River, Massachusetts, on the 26th of January 1833. He was educated in his native city and in New Orleans, where he early entered his step-father’s counting-house. Returning to Massachusetts in 1849, he became a clerk and subsequently a junior partner in a prominent Boston commercial house. Later he removed to New York City to establish a branch of the firm. In 1881 he organized and became president of Bliss, Fabyan & Company, one of the largest wholesale dry-goods houses in the country. A consistent advocate of the protective tariff, he was one of the organizers, and for many years president, of the American Protective Tariff League. In politics an active Republican, he was chairman of the Republican state committee in 1887 and 1888, and contributed much to the success of the Harrison ticket in New York in the latter year. He was treasurer of the Republican national committee from 1892 to 1904, and was secretary of the interior in President McKinley’s cabinet from 1897 to 1899.
BLISS, CORNELIUS NEWTON (1833- ), American merchant and politician, was born in Fall River, Massachusetts, on January 26, 1833. He was educated in his hometown and in New Orleans, where he started working in his stepfather’s office. He returned to Massachusetts in 1849, becoming a clerk and later a junior partner in a well-known commercial firm in Boston. He then moved to New York City to set up a branch of the business. In 1881, he organized and became president of Bliss, Fabyan & Company, one of the largest wholesale dry-goods companies in the country. A strong supporter of the protective tariff, he was one of the founders and served as president for many years of the American Protective Tariff League. In politics, he was an active Republican, serving as chairman of the Republican state committee in 1887 and 1888, and played a significant role in the success of the Harrison campaign in New York that year. He was treasurer of the Republican national committee from 1892 to 1904 and served as secretary of the interior in President McKinley’s cabinet from 1897 to 1899.
BLISTER (a word found in many forms in Teutonic languages, cf. Ger. Blase; it is ultimately connected with the same root as in “blow,” cf. “bladder”), a small vesicle filled with serous fluid raised on the skin by a burn, by rubbing on a hard surface, as on the hand in rowing, or by other injury; the term is also used of a similar condition of the skin caused artificially, as a counter-irritant in cases of inflammation, by the application of mustard, of various kinds of fly (see Cantharides) and of other vesicatories. Similar small swellings, filled with fluid or air, on plants and on the surface of steel or paint, &c., are also called “blisters.”
BLISTER (this word appears in many forms in Teutonic languages, like Ger. Blase; it's ultimately linked to the same root as in “blow,” as in “bladder”), is a small bubble filled with clear fluid that forms on the skin due to a burn, rubbing against a hard surface (like when rowing), or other kinds of injury. The term also refers to a similar skin condition that is intentionally created as a counter-irritant in cases of inflammation, by using mustard, different types of fly (see Cantharides), and other blistering agents. Similar small bumps filled with fluid or air on plants, or the surfaces of steel or paint, etc., are also called “blisters.”
BLIZZARD (origin probably onomatopoeic, cf. “blast,” “bluster”), a furious wind driving fine particles of choking, blinding snow whirling in icy clouds. The conditions to which the name was originally given occur with the northerly winds in rear of the cyclones crossing the eastern states of America during winter.
BLIZZARD (probably derived from onomatopoeia, similar to “blast” and “bluster”), is a violent wind that sends fine, choking snow swirling in blinding icy clouds. The conditions associated with this term typically occur with northern winds that follow cyclones moving across the eastern United States during winter.
BLOCK, MARK ELIEZER (c. 1723-1799), German naturalist, was born at Ansbach, of poor Jewish parents, about 1723. After taking his degree as doctor at Frankfort-on-Oder he established himself as a physician at Berlin. His first scientific work of importance was an essay on intestinal worms, which gained a prize from the Academy of Copenhagen, but he is best known by his important work on fishes (see Ichthyology). Bloch was fifty-six when he began to write on ichthyological subjects. To begin at his time of life a work in which he intended not only to give full descriptions of the species known to him from specimens or drawings, but also to illustrate each species in a style truly magnificent for his time, was an undertaking the execution of which most men would have despaired of. Yet he accomplished not only this task, but even more than he at first contemplated. He died at Carlsbad on the 6th of August 1799.
BLOCK, MARK ELIEZER (c. 1723-1799), German naturalist, was born in Ansbach to poor Jewish parents around 1723. After earning his medical degree in Frankfort-on-Oder, he set up as a physician in Berlin. His first major scientific work was an essay on intestinal worms, which won a prize from the Academy of Copenhagen, but he is best known for his significant work on fish (see Ichthyology). Bloch was fifty-six when he started writing about ichthyology. To begin such a project at his age, intending not only to provide detailed descriptions of the species known to him from specimens or drawings but also to illustrate each species in a style that was truly magnificent for his time, was a challenge that would have daunted most people. Yet he not only achieved this goal but exceeded even his original expectations. He passed away in Carlsbad on August 6, 1799.
BLOCK, MAURICE (1816-1901), French statistician, was born in Berlin of Jewish parents on the 18th of February 1816. He studied at Bonn and Giessen, but settled in Paris, becoming naturalized there. In 1844 he entered the French ministry of agriculture, becoming in 1852 one of the heads of the statistical department. He retired in 1862, and thenceforth devoted himself entirely to statistical studies, which have gained for him a wide reputation. He was elected a member of the Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques in 1880. He died in Paris on the 9th of January 1901. His principal works are: Dictionnaire de l’administration française (1856); Statistique de la France (1860); Dictionnaire général de la politique (1862); L’Europe polilique et sociale (1869); Traité théorique et pratique de statistique (1878); Les Progrés de l’économie politique depuis Adam Smith (1890); he also edited from 1856 L’Annuaire de l’économie politique et de la statistique, and wrote in German Die Bevolkerung des französischen Kaiserreichs (1861); Die Bevolkerung Spaniens und Portugals (1861); and Die Machtstellung der europäischen Staaten (1862).
BLOCK, MAURICE (1816-1901), a French statistician, was born in Berlin to Jewish parents on February 18, 1816. He studied at Bonn and Giessen but settled in Paris, where he became a naturalized citizen. In 1844, he joined the French Ministry of Agriculture and became one of the heads of the statistical department in 1852. He retired in 1862 and dedicated himself entirely to statistical research, which earned him a wide reputation. He was elected a member of the Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques in 1880. He passed away in Paris on January 9, 1901. His main works include: Dictionnaire de l’administration française (1856); Statistique de la France (1860); Dictionnaire général de la politique (1862); L’Europe politique et sociale (1869); Traité théorique et pratique de statistique (1878); Les Progrés de l’économie politique depuis Adam Smith (1890); he also edited L’Annuaire de l’économie politique et de la statistique from 1856, and wrote in German Die Bevolkerung des französischen Kaiserreichs (1861); Die Bevolkerung Spaniens und Portugals (1861); and Die Machtstellung der europäischen Staaten (1862).
BLOCK (from the Fr. bloc, and possibly connected with an Old Ger. Block, obstruction, cf. “baulk”), a piece of wood. The word is used in various senses, e.g. the block upon which people were beheaded, the block or mould upon which a hat is shaped, a pulley-block, a printing-block, &c. From the sense of a solid mass comes the expression, a “block” of houses, i.e. a rectangular space covered with houses and bounded by four streets. From the sense of “obstruction” comes a “block” in traffic, a block in any proceedings, and the block system of signalling on railways.
BLOCK (from the Fr. bloc, and possibly related to an Old Ger. Block, meaning obstruction, see “baulk”), a piece of wood. The term is used in various ways, e.g. the block where people were beheaded, the block or mold used to shape a hat, a pulley block, a printing block, etc. From the idea of a solid mass comes the term “block” of houses, i.e. a rectangular area covered with houses and bordered by four streets. From the idea of “obstruction” comes a “block” in traffic, a block in any process, and the block system of signaling on railways.
BLOCKADE (Fr. blocus, Ger. Blokade), a term used in maritime warfare. Originally a blockade by sea was probably nothing more than the equivalent in maritime warfare of a blockade or siege on land in which the army investing the blockaded or besieged place is in actual physical possession of a zone through which it can prevent and forbid ingress and egress. An attempt to cross such a zone without the consent of the investing army would be an act of hostility against the besiegers. A maritime blockade, when it formed part of a siege, would obviously also be a close blockade, being part of the military cordon drawn round the besieged place. Even from the first, however, differences would begin to grow up in the conditions arising out of the operations on land and on sea. Thus whereas conveying merchandise across military lines would be a deliberate act of hostility against the investing force, a neutral ship which had sailed in ignorance of the blockade for the blockaded place might in good faith cross the blockade line without committing a hostile act against the investing force. With the development of recognition of neutral rights the involuntary character of the breach would be taken into account, and notice to neutral states and to approaching vessels would come into use. With the employment in warfare of larger vessels in the place of the more numerous small ones of an earlier age, notice, moreover, would tend to take the place of de facto investment, and at a time when communication between governments was still slow and precarious, such notice would sometimes be given as a possible measure of belligerent tactics before the blockade could be actually carried out. Out of these circumstances grew up the abuse of “paper blockades.”
BLOCKADE (Fr. blocus, Ger. Blokade) refers to a term used in maritime warfare. Initially, a sea blockade was likely just the maritime equivalent of a land blockade or siege, where the military surrounding the blockaded location physically controls an area that stops anyone from entering or leaving. Attempting to cross this area without permission from the surrounding army would be seen as an act of aggression against them. A maritime blockade, when part of a siege, would obviously be a close blockade, as it is part of the military perimeter around the besieged location. However, even from the start, differences would arise from land and sea operations. For example, transporting goods across military lines would be a clear act of hostility against the surrounding force, but a neutral ship that unknowingly entered the blockade zone might cross the line without meaning to engage in hostility against the blockading force. As the understanding of neutral rights grew, the unintentional nature of such breaches would be considered, and notifications to neutral states and approaching vessels would become standard. Additionally, with the use of larger ships instead of many smaller ones common in earlier times, notifications would often replace de facto enforcement, especially at a time when communication between governments was slow and unreliable. Consequently, such notifications could sometimes serve as a tactic for belligerent actions before an actual blockade was implemented. This situation led to the misuse of “paper blockades.”
The climax was reached in the “Continental Blockade” decreed by Napoleon in 1806, which continued till it was abolished by international agreement in 1812. This blockade forbade all countries under French dominion or allied with France to have any communication with Great Britain. Great Britain replied in 1807 by a similar measure. The first nation to protest against these fictitious blockades was the United States. Already in 1800 John Marshall, secretary of state, wrote to the American minister in Great Britain pointing out objections which have since been universally admitted. In the following interesting passage he said:—
The climax was reached in the “Continental Blockade” instituted by Napoleon in 1806, which lasted until it was lifted by international agreement in 1812. This blockade prohibited all countries under French control or allied with France from having any communication with Great Britain. Great Britain responded in 1807 with a similar measure. The first nation to protest against these false blockades was the United States. As early as 1800, John Marshall, the secretary of state, wrote to the American minister in Great Britain outlining objections that have since been widely accepted. In the following interesting passage, he said:—
“Ports not effectually blockaded by a force capable of completely investing them have yet been declared in a state of blockade.... If the effectiveness of the blockade be dispensed with, then every port of the belligerent powers may at all times be declared in that state, and the commerce of neutrals be thereby subjected to universal capture. But if this principle be strictly adhered to, the capacity to blockade will be limited by the naval force of the belligerent and, in consequence, the mischief to neutral commerce cannot be very extensive. It is, therefore, of the last importance to neutrals that this principle be maintained unimpaired. I observe that you have pressed this reasoning on the British minister, who replies that an occasional absence of a fleet from a blockaded port ought not to change the state of the place. Whatever force this observation may be entitled to, where that occasional absence has been produced by an accident, as a storm, which for a moment blows off a fleet and forces it from its station, which station it immediately resumes, I am persuaded that where a part of the fleet is applied, though only for a time, to other objects or comes into port, the very principle requiring an effective blockade, which is that the mischief can only be coextensive with the naval force of the belligerent, requires that during such temporary absence the commerce to the neutrals to the place should be free.”1
“Ports that aren't effectively blockaded by a force capable of completely surrounding them have still been declared under blockade... If the effectiveness of the blockade is ignored, then every port of the warring powers could be declared in that state at any time, which would put neutral trade at risk of universal capture. But if this principle is strictly followed, the ability to blockade will depend on the naval force of the warring powers, meaning the damage to neutral trade cannot be too extensive. It is, therefore, crucial for neutrals that this principle is maintained without compromise. I see that you've pointed this reasoning out to the British minister, who responds that an occasional absence of a fleet from a blockaded port shouldn't change the status of the location. Regardless of how valid this observation might be, especially when that absence is caused by an accident, like a storm that temporarily sweeps a fleet away and forces them to leave their position, which they quickly return to, I believe that if part of the fleet is assigned to other duties, even if just for a short time, the very principle requiring an effective blockade—which states that the damage can only be limited to the naval force of the belligerent—demands that during such temporary absence, neutral trade to that location should be allowed.”1
Again in 1803 James Madison wrote to the then American minister in London:—
Again in 1803, James Madison wrote to the American minister in London:—
“The law of nations requires to constitute a blockade that there should be the presence and position of a force rendering access to the prohibited place manifestly difficult and dangerous.”2
“The law of nations states that for a blockade to be valid, there must be a force present that makes access to the restricted area clearly difficult and dangerous.”2
In 1826 and 1827 Great Britain as well as the United States asserted that blockades in order to be binding must be effective. This became gradually the recognized view, and when in 1856 the powers represented at the congress of Paris inserted in the declaration there adopted that “blockades in order to be binding must be effective, that is to say, maintained by a force sufficient really to prevent access to the coast of an enemy,” they were merely enunciating a rule which neutral states had already become too powerful to allow belligerents to disregard.
In 1826 and 1827, both Great Britain and the United States argued that for blockades to be valid, they must actually be effective. This view gradually gained recognition, and when the countries represented at the Congress of Paris in 1856 included in their declaration that “blockades in order to be binding must be effective, that is to say, maintained by a force sufficient really to prevent access to the coast of an enemy,” they were simply stating a rule that neutral states had become too strong to let warring nations ignore.
Blockade is universally admitted to be a belligerent right to which under international law neutrals are obliged to submit. It is now also universally admitted that the above-quoted rule of the Declaration of Paris forms part of international law, independently of the declaration. Being, however, exclusively a belligerent right, it cannot be exercised except by a belligerent force. Even a de facto belligerent has the right to institute a blockade binding on neutrals if it has the means of making it effective, though the force opposed to it may treat the de facto belligerent as rebels.
Blockade is widely recognized as a right of belligerents that neutrals must respect under international law. It is also widely accepted that the previously mentioned rule from the Declaration of Paris is part of international law, regardless of the declaration itself. However, since it is solely a right of belligerents, it can only be enforced by a belligerent force. Even a de facto belligerent can establish a blockade that is binding on neutrals if it has the ability to enforce it, even if the opposing force views the de facto belligerent as rebels.
It is also admitted that, being exclusively a belligerent right, it cannot be exercised in time of peace, but there has been some inconsistency in practice (see Pacific Blockade) which will probably lead governments, in order to avoid protests of neutral powers against belligerent rights being exercised in mere coercive proceedings, to exercise all the rights of belligerents and carry on de facto war to entitle them to use violence against neutral infringers. This was done in the case of the blockade of Venezuela by Great Britain, Germany and Italy in 1902-1903.
It is also acknowledged that, being solely a right of conflict, it cannot be used during peacetime. However, there has been some inconsistency in practice (see Pacific Blockade), which will likely lead governments to exercise all belligerent rights and engage in de facto war. This is to justify using force against neutral parties that violate these rights, in order to avoid protests from neutral nations. This occurred during the blockade of Venezuela by Great Britain, Germany, and Italy in 1902-1903.
The points upon which controversy still arises are as to what constitutes an “effective” blockade and what a sufficient notice of blockade to warrant the penalties of violation, viz. confiscation of the ship and of the cargo unless the evidence demonstrates the innocence of the cargo owners. A blockade to be effective must be maintained by a sufficient force to prevent the entrance of neutral vessels into the blockaded port or ports, and it must be duly proclaimed. Subject to these principles being complied with, “the question of the legitimacy and effectiveness of a blockade is one of fact to be determined in each case upon the evidence presented” (Thomas F. Bayard, American secretary of state, to Messrs Kamer & Co., 19th of February 1889). The British manual of naval prize law sums up the cases in which a blockade, validly instituted, ceases to be effectively maintained, as follows:—(1) If the blockading force abandons its position, unless the abandonment be merely temporary or caused by stress of weather, or (2) if it be driven away by the enemy, or (3) if it be negligent in its duties, or (4) if it be partial in the execution of its duties towards one ship rather than another, or towards the ships of one nation rather than those of another. These cases, however, are based on decisions of the British admiralty court and cannot be relied on absolutely as a statement of international law.
The points of debate still revolve around what defines an “effective” blockade and what constitutes sufficient notice of blockade to justify the penalties of violation, such as confiscating the ship and cargo unless the evidence shows the cargo owners are innocent. For a blockade to be effective, it must be upheld by enough force to stop neutral vessels from entering the blockaded port(s), and it must be properly announced. As long as these principles are followed, “the question of the legitimacy and effectiveness of a blockade is one of fact to be determined in each case based on the evidence presented” (Thomas F. Bayard, American secretary of state, to Messrs Kamer & Co., February 19, 1889). The British manual of naval prize law summarizes the situations in which a validly established blockade stops being effectively maintained as follows: (1) If the blockading force leaves its position, unless the departure is only temporary or due to bad weather, (2) if it is driven away by the enemy, (3) if it is negligent in its duties, or (4) if it treats one ship differently than another, or ships from one nation differently than those from another. However, these situations are based on decisions from the British admiralty court and shouldn't be completely relied upon as a definitive statement of international law.
As regards notice the following American instructions vere given to blockading officers in June 1898:—
As for notice, the following American instructions were given to blockading officers in June 1898:—
“Neutral vessels are entitled to notification of a blockade before they can be made prize for its attempted violation. The character of this notification is not material. It may be actual, as by a vessel of the blockading force, or constructive, as by a proclamation of the government maintaining the blockade, or by common notoriety. If a neutral vessel can be shown to have had notice of the blockade in any way, she is good prize, and should be sent in for adjudication; but should formal notice not have been given, the rule of constructive knowledge arising from notoriety should be construed in a manner liberal to the neutral.
“Neutral vessels need to be notified of a blockade before they can be seized for trying to break it. The way this notification is given doesn’t really matter. It can be direct, like by a ship from the blockading force, or indirect, like through a proclamation from the government that’s enforcing the blockade, or by general public knowledge. If it can be proven that a neutral vessel was aware of the blockade in any way, it can be seized and sent for legal review; however, if formal notice wasn’t given, the principle of constructive knowledge based on public awareness should be interpreted in a way that favors the neutral.
“Vessels appearing before a blockaded port, having sailed without notification, are entitled to actual notice by a blockading vessel. They should be boarded by an officer, who should enter in the ship’s log the fact of such notice, such entry to include the name of the blockading vessel giving notice, the extent of the blockade, the date and place, verified by his official signature. The vessel is then to be set free; and should she again attempt to enter the same or any other blockaded port as to which she has had notice, she is good prize. Should it appear from a vessel’s clearance that she sailed after notice of blockade had been communicated to the country of her port of departure, or after the fact of blockade had, by a fair presumption, become commonly known at that port, she should be sent in as a prize.”
“Ships arriving at a blockaded port without prior notice are entitled to receive actual notification from a blockading ship. An officer should board the ship and record this notice in the ship’s log, which must include the name of the blockading vessel, the extent of the blockade, the date and location, and must be verified by his official signature. The vessel is then released; however, if it tries to enter the same or any other blockaded port it has already been informed about, it can be seized as a prize. If it is discovered that a vessel left after being informed of the blockade at its departing port, or after the fact of the blockade had been reasonably assumed to be commonly known at that port, it should be captured as a prize.”
The passages in italics are not in accordance with the views held by other states, which do not recognize the binding character of a diplomatic notification or of constructive notice from notoriety.
The italicized sections do not align with the perspectives of other states, which do not acknowledge the binding nature of a diplomatic notification or of constructive notice from general knowledge.
The subject was brought up at the second Hague Conference (1907). The Italian and Mexican delegations submitted projects, but after a declaration by the British delegate in charge of the subject (Sir E. Satow) that blockade not having been included in the Russian programme, his government had given him no instructions upon it, the subject, at his suggestion, was dropped. A Voeu, however, was adopted in favour of formulating rules on all branches of the laws and customs of naval war, and a convention was agreed to for the establishment of an international Prize Court (see Prize). Under Art. 7 of the latter convention the Court was to apply the “rules of international law,” and in their absence the “general principles of justice and equity.” As soon as possible after the close of the second Hague Conference the British government took steps to call a special conference of the maritime powers, which sat from December 4, 1908 to February 26, 1909. Among the subjects dealt with was Blockade, the rules relating to which are as follow:—
The topic was raised at the second Hague Conference (1907). The Italian and Mexican delegations proposed projects, but after a statement by the British delegate responsible for the topic (Sir E. Satow) that blockade wasn’t included in the Russian agenda and his government hadn’t given him instructions regarding it, the topic was dropped at his suggestion. A Voeu, however, was passed in favor of creating rules for all aspects of the laws and customs of naval warfare, and a convention was agreed upon to set up an international Prize Court (see Prize). Under Article 7 of this convention, the Court was to apply the “rules of international law,” and in their absence, the “general principles of justice and equity.” Soon after the second Hague Conference concluded, the British government took steps to convene a special meeting of the maritime powers, which took place from December 4, 1908, to February 26, 1909. Among the topics discussed was Blockade, with the related rules as follows:—
Art. 1. A blockade must not extend beyond the ports and coasts belonging to or occupied by the enemy.
Art. 1. A blockade must not reach beyond the ports and coasts owned or occupied by the enemy.
Art. 2. In accordance with the Declaration of Paris of 1856, a blockade, in order to be binding, must be effective—that is to say, it must be maintained by a force sufficient really to prevent access to the enemy coastline.
Art. 2. According to the Declaration of Paris of 1856, for a blockade to be legally binding, it must be effective—that is, it must be enforced by a force strong enough to actually prevent access to the enemy's coastline.
Art. 3. The question whether a blockade is effective is a question of fact.
Art. 3. Whether a blockade is effective is a matter of fact.
Art. 4. A blockade is not regarded as raised if the blockading force is temporarily withdrawn on account of stress of weather.
Art. 4. A blockade is not considered lifted if the blockading force is temporarily pulled back due to bad weather.
Art. 5. A blockade must be applied impartially to the ships of all nations.
Art. 5. A blockade must be enforced fairly on the ships of all nations.
Art. 6. The commander of a blockading force may give permission to a warship to enter, and subsequently to leave, a blockaded port.
Art. 6. The commander of a blockading force may grant permission for a warship to enter and later leave a blockaded port.
Art. 7. In circumstances of distress, acknowledged by an officer of the blockading force, a neutral vessel may enter a place under blockade and subsequently leave it, provided that she has neither discharged nor shipped any cargo there.
Art. 7. In cases of distress, recognized by an officer of the blockading force, a neutral ship may enter an area under blockade and then leave, as long as it hasn’t unloaded or taken on any cargo there.
Art. 8. A blockade, in order to be binding, must be declared in accordance with Article 9, and notified in accordance with Articles 11 and 16.
Art. 8. For a blockade to be legally binding, it must be declared according to Article 9 and communicated in accordance with Articles 11 and 16.
Art. 9. A declaration of blockade is made either by the blockading power or by the naval authorities acting in its name. It specifies (1) the date when the blockade begins; (2) the geographical limits of the coastline under blockade; (3) the period within which neutral vessels may come out.
Art. 9. A declaration of blockade is made either by the blockading power or by the naval authorities acting on its behalf. It specifies (1) the date when the blockade starts; (2) the geographical limits of the coastline that is under blockade; (3) the time frame during which neutral vessels are allowed to leave.
Art. 10. If the operations of the blockading power, or of the naval authorities acting in its name, do not tally with the particulars, which, in accordance with Article 9 (1) and (2), must be inserted in the declaration of blockade, the declaration is void, and a new declaration is necessary in order to make the blockade operative.
Art. 10. If the actions of the blockading power, or the naval authorities acting on its behalf, do not match the details that, according to Article 9 (1) and (2), must be included in the blockade declaration, the declaration is invalid, and a new declaration is required to make the blockade effective.
Art. 11. A declaration of blockade is notified: (1) to neutral powers, by the blockading power by means of a communication addressed to the governments direct, or to their representatives accredited to it; (2) to the local authorities, by the officer commanding the blockading force. The local authorities will, in turn, inform the foreign consular officers at the port or on the coastline under blockade as soon as possible.
Art. 11. A declaration of blockade is communicated: (1) to neutral countries, by the blockading power through a message sent directly to their governments, or to their representatives assigned to it; (2) to the local authorities, by the officer in charge of the blockading force. The local authorities will then inform the foreign consular officials at the port or along the coastline under blockade as soon as possible.
Art. 12. The rules as to declaration and notification of blockade apply to cases where the limits of a blockade are extended, or where a blockade is re-established after having been raised.
Art. 12. The rules regarding the declaration and notification of blockade apply to situations where the boundaries of a blockade are expanded, or where a blockade is reinstated after being lifted.
Art. 13. The voluntary raising of a blockade, as also any restriction in the limits of a blockade, must be notified in the manner prescribed by Article 11.
Art. 13. The voluntary lifting of a blockade, along with any changes to the boundaries of a blockade, must be communicated in the way specified by Article 11.
Art. 14. The liability of a neutral vessel to capture for breach of blockade is contingent on her knowledge, actual or presumptive, of the blockade.
Art. 14. A neutral ship can be seized for violating a blockade only if it knows, either directly or based on reasonable assumption, about the existence of the blockade.
Art. 15. Failing proof to the contrary, knowledge of the blockade is presumed if the vessel left a neutral port subsequently to the notification of the blockade to the power to which such port belongs, provided that such notification was made in sufficient time.
Art. 15. Unless proven otherwise, it is assumed that the vessel is aware of the blockade if it left a neutral port after the blockade was announced to the authority of that port, as long as the announcement was made in a timely manner.
Art. 16. If a vessel approaching a blockaded port has no knowledge, actual or presumptive, of the blockade, the notification must be made to the vessel itself by an officer of one of the ships of the blockading force. This notification should be entered in the vessel’s logbook, and must state the day and hour, and the geographical position of the vessel at the time. If through the negligence of the officer commanding the blockading force no declaration of blockade has been notified to the local authorities, or if in the declaration, as notified, no period has been mentioned within which neutral vessels may come out, a neutral vessel coming out of the blockaded port must be allowed to pass free.
Art. 16. If a ship approaching a blockaded port is unaware, either actually or reasonably, of the blockade, an officer from one of the ships in the blockading force must notify the vessel directly. This notification should be recorded in the ship's logbook, indicating the date and time, and the geographical location of the vessel at that moment. If the officer in charge of the blockading force has failed to inform the local authorities of the blockade, or if the declaration that was made does not specify a timeframe during which neutral vessels may exit, a neutral ship leaving the blockaded port must be allowed to pass freely.
Art. 17. Neutral vessels may not be captured for breach of blockade except within the area of operations of the warships detailed to render the blockade effective.
Art. 17. Neutral vessels cannot be seized for violating a blockade except within the operational area of the warships assigned to enforce the blockade.
Art. 18. The blockading forces must not bar access to neutral ports or coasts.
Art. 18. The blockading forces must not prevent access to neutral ports or coastlines.
Art. 19. Whatever may be the ulterior destination of a vessel or of her cargo, she cannot be captured for breach of blockade, if, at the moment, she is on her way to a non-blockaded port.
Art. 19. No matter where a vessel or its cargo is ultimately headed, it cannot be seized for violating a blockade if, at the time, it is on its way to a port that is not under blockade.
Art. 20. A vessel which has broken blockade outwards, or which has attempted to break blockade inwards, is liable to capture so long as she is pursued by a ship of the blockading force. If the pursuit is abandoned, or if the blockade is raised, her capture can no longer be effected.
Art. 20. A ship that has successfully crossed a blockade or tried to enter a blocked area can be seized as long as a ship from the blockading force is chasing it. If the chase is called off or the blockade is lifted, it can no longer be captured.
Art. 21. A vessel found guilty of breach of blockade is liable to condemnation. The cargo is also condemned, unless it is proved that at the time of the shipment of the goods the shipper neither knew nor could have known of the intention to break the blockade.
Art. 21. A vessel found guilty of violating a blockade is subject to being seized. The cargo is also seized unless it can be proven that, at the time the goods were shipped, the shipper neither knew nor could have known about the intention to violate the blockade.
1 John Marshall, secretary of state, to Rufus King, minister to England, 20th of September 1800, Am. State Papers, Class I, For. Rel. II, No. 181, J.B. Moore, Digest of International Law, vii. 788.
1 John Marshall, Secretary of State, to Rufus King, Minister to England, September 20, 1800, Am. State Papers, Class I, For. Rel. II, No. 181, J.B. Moore, Digest of International Law, vii. 788.
BLOCKHOUSE, in fortification, a small roofed work serving as a fortified post for a small garrison. The word, common since 1500, is of uncertain origin, and was applied to what is now called a fort d’arrêt, a detached fort blocking the access to a landing, channel, pass, bridge or defile. The modern blockhouse is a building, sometimes of two storeys, which is loopholed on all sides, and not infrequently, in the case of two-storey blockhouses, provided with a mâchicoulis gallery. Blockhouses are built of wood, brick, stone, corrugated iron or any material available. During the South African War (1899-1902) they were often sent from England to the front in ready-made sections.
BLOCKHOUSE, in fortification, a small roofed structure that serves as a fortified position for a small garrison. The term, which has been in use since 1500, has an uncertain origin and was used to describe what is now known as a fort d’arrêt, a detached fort that blocks access to a landing, channel, pass, bridge, or defile. The modern blockhouse is a building, sometimes two stories high, with openings for shooting on all sides, and often, in the case of two-story blockhouses, has a mâchicoulis gallery. Blockhouses can be constructed from wood, brick, stone, corrugated iron, or any available material. During the South African War (1899-1902), they were often shipped from England to the front in pre-made sections.
BLOEMAERT, ABRAHAM (1564-1651), Dutch painter and engraver, was born at Gorinchem, the son of an architect. He was first a pupil of Gerrit Splinter (pupil of Frans Floris) and of Joos de Beer, at Utrecht. He then spent three years in Paris, studying under several masters, and on his return to his native country received further training from Hieronymus Francken. In 1591 he went to Amsterdam, and four years later settled finally at Utrecht, where he became dean of the Gild of St Luke. He excelled more as a colourist than as a draughtsman, was extremely productive, and painted and etched historical and allegorical pictures, landscapes, still-life, animal pictures and flower pieces. Among his pupils are his four sons, Hendrick, Frederick, Cornelis and Adriaan (all of whom achieved considerable reputation as painters or engravers), the two Honthorsts and Jacob G. Cuyp.
BLOEMAERT, ABRAHAM (1564-1651), was a Dutch painter and engraver born in Gorinchem as the son of an architect. He initially studied under Gerrit Splinter (a student of Frans Floris) and Joos de Beer in Utrecht. Afterward, he spent three years in Paris learning from various masters, and upon returning to his home country, he received additional training from Hieronymus Francken. In 1591, he moved to Amsterdam, and four years later, he settled permanently in Utrecht, where he became the dean of the Gild of St Luke. He was more skilled as a colorist than as a draftsman, was very productive, and painted and etched historical and allegorical pieces, landscapes, still-lifes, animal paintings, and flower compositions. His pupils included his four sons—Hendrick, Frederick, Cornelis, and Adriaan—who all gained significant recognition as painters or engravers, as well as the two Honthorsts and Jacob G. Cuyp.
BLOEMEN, JAN FRANS VAN (1662-1740), Flemish painter, was born at Antwerp, and studied and lived in Italy. At Rome he was styled Orizonte, on account of his painting of distance in his landscapes, which are reminiscent of Gaspard Poussin and much admired. His brothers Pieter (1657-1719), styled Standaart (from his military pictures), and Norbert (1670-1746), were also well-known painters.
BLOEMEN, JAN FRANS VAN (1662-1740), Flemish painter, was born in Antwerp and studied and lived in Italy. In Rome, he was called Orizonte because of his ability to paint distance in his landscapes, which are similar to those of Gaspard Poussin and highly praised. His brothers Pieter (1657-1719), known as Standaart (due to his military paintings), and Norbert (1670-1746), were also well-known painters.
BLOEMFONTEIN, capital of the Orange Free State, in 29º 8′ S., 26º 18′ E. It is situated on the open veld, surrounded by a few low kopjes, 4518 ft. above the sea, 105 m. by rail E. by S. of Kimberley, 750 N.E. by E. of Cape Town, 450 N. by E. of Port Elizabeth, and 257 S.W. of Johannesburg.
BLOEMFONTEIN, is the capital of the Orange Free State, located at 29º 8′ S., 26º 18′ E. It sits on the open grassland, surrounded by a few low hills, at an elevation of 4,518 feet above sea level. It is 105 miles by rail east-southeast of Kimberley, 750 miles northeast by east of Cape Town, 450 miles north by east of Port Elizabeth, and 257 miles southwest of Johannesburg.
Bloemfontein is a very pleasant town, regularly laid out with streets running at right angles and a large central market square. Many of the houses are surrounded by large wooded gardens. Through the town runs the Bloemspruit. After a disastrous flood in 1904 the course of this spring was straightened and six stone bridges placed across it. There are several fine public buildings, mostly built of red brick and a fine-grained white stone quarried in the neighbourhood. The Raadzaal, a building in the Renaissance style, faces Market Square. Formerly the meeting-place of the Orange Free State Raad, it is now the seat of the provincial council. In front of the old Raadzaal (used as law courts) is a statue of President Brand. In Douglas Street is an unpretentious building used in turn as a church, a raadzaal, a court-house and a museum. In it was signed (1854) the convention which recognized the independence of the Free State Boers (see Orange Free State: History). Among the churches the most important, architecturally, are the Dutch Reformed, a building with two spires, and the Anglican cathedral, which has a fine interior. The chief educational establishment is Grey University College, built 1906-1908 at a cost of £125,000. It stands in grounds of 300 acres, a mile and a half from the town. In the town is the original Grey College, founded in 1856 by Sir George Grey, when governor of Cape Colony. The post and telegraph office in Market Square is one of the finest buildings in the town. The public library is housed in a handsome building in Warden Street. Opposite it is the new national museum.
Bloemfontein is a charming town, well-planned with streets running at right angles and a large central market square. Many of the houses are set in spacious, wooded gardens. The Bloemspruit river flows through the town. After a devastating flood in 1904, the river's course was straightened, and six stone bridges were built across it. There are several impressive public buildings, mostly made of red brick and fine white stone quarried locally. The Raadzaal, a Renaissance-style building, faces Market Square. Once the meeting place of the Orange Free State Raad, it now serves as the seat of the provincial council. In front of the old Raadzaal, which is used as law courts, stands a statue of President Brand. On Douglas Street, there’s a simple building that has served as a church, a raadzaal, a courthouse, and a museum. It was here that the convention recognizing the independence of the Free State Boers was signed in 1854 (see Orange Free State: History). Among the churches, the most architecturally significant are the Dutch Reformed church, featuring two spires, and the Anglican cathedral, known for its beautiful interior. The main educational institution is Grey University College, built between 1906 and 1908 at a cost of £125,000, situated on 300 acres of land a mile and a half from the town. The original Grey College, founded in 1856 by Sir George Grey when he was governor of Cape Colony, is located in the town. The post and telegraph office in Market Square is one of the finest buildings in the area. The public library occupies an attractive building on Warden Street, and opposite it is the new national museum.
Bloemfontein possesses few manufactures, but is the trading centre of the province. Having a dry healthy climate, it is a favourite residential town and a resort for invalids, being recommended especially for pulmonary disease. The mean maximum temperature is 76.7° Fahr., the mean minimum 45.8°; the mean annual rainfall about 24 in. There is an excellent water-supply, obtained partly from Bloemspruit, but principally from the Modder river at Sanna’s Post, 22 m. to the east, and from reservoirs at Moches Dam and Magdepoort.
Bloemfontein has few factories, but it serves as the main trading hub of the province. With its dry, healthy climate, it's a popular place to live and a retreat for people with health issues, especially those with lung problems. The average high temperature is 76.7° F, the average low is 45.8°; and the average annual rainfall is around 24 inches. There's a great water supply, sourced partly from Bloemspruit, but mainly from the Modder River at Sanna’s Post, 22 miles to the east, and from reservoirs at Moches Dam and Magdepoort.
The population in 1904 was 33,883, of whom, including the garrison of 3487, 15,501 were white, compared with a white population of 2077 in 1890. The coloured inhabitants are mostly Bechuana and Basuto. Most of the whites are of British origin, and English is the common language of all, including the Dutch.
The population in 1904 was 33,883, which included a garrison of 3,487. Of the total, 15,501 were white, compared to a white population of 2,077 in 1890. The colored inhabitants were mostly Bechuana and Basuto. Most of the whites were of British origin, and English was the common language for everyone, including the Dutch.
The spruit or spring which gives its name to the town was called after one of the emigrant farmers, Jan Bloem. The town dates from 1846, in which year Major H.D. Warden, then British resident north of the Orange, selected the site as the seat of his administration. When in 1854 independence was conferred on the country the town was chosen by the Boers as the seat of government. It became noted for the intelligence of its citizens, and for the educational advantages it offered at the time when education among the Boers was thought of very lightly. In 1892 the railway connecting it with Cape Town and Johannesburg was completed. During the Anglo-Boer War of 1899-1902 it was occupied by the British under Lord Roberts without resistance (13th of March 1900), fourteen days after the surrender of General Cronje at Paardeberg. In Market Square on the 28th of the following May the annexation of the Orange Free State to the British dominions was proclaimed. In 1907 the first session of the first parliament elected under the constitution granting the colony self-government was held in Bloemfontein. In 1910 when the colony became a province of the Union of South Africa under its old designation of Orange Free State, Bloemfontein was chosen as the seat of the Supreme Court of South Africa. Its growth as a business centre after the close of the war in 1902 was very marked. The rateable value increased from £709,000 in 1901 to £2,400,000 in 1905.
The spruit or spring that names the town is named after one of the immigrant farmers, Jan Bloem. The town was established in 1846, when Major H.D. Warden, the British resident north of the Orange River, chose the site as the center of his administration. In 1854, when independence was granted to the country, the town was selected by the Boers as the seat of government. It became known for the intelligence of its residents and the educational opportunities it provided at a time when education among the Boers was often undervalued. The railway connecting it to Cape Town and Johannesburg was completed in 1892. During the Anglo-Boer War from 1899 to 1902, it was taken over by the British under Lord Roberts without any resistance on March 13, 1900, just fourteen days after General Cronje's surrender at Paardeberg. The annexation of the Orange Free State to the British territories was announced in Market Square on May 28 of that year. In 1907, the first session of the first parliament, elected under the constitution granting the colony self-governance, took place in Bloemfontein. When the colony became a province of the Union of South Africa in 1910 with its original name of Orange Free State, Bloemfontein was designated as the seat of the Supreme Court of South Africa. Its development as a business center after the war in 1902 was significant, with its rateable value rising from £709,000 in 1901 to £2,400,000 in 1905.
BLOET, ROBERT (d. 1123), English bishop, was chancellor to William I. and Rufus. From the latter he received the see of Lincoln (1093) in succession to Remigius. His private character was indifferent; but he administered his see with skill and prudence, built largely, and kept a magnificent household, which served as a training-school even for the sons of nobles. Bloet was active in assisting Henry I. during the rebellion of 1102, and became that monarch’s justiciar. Latterly, however, he fell out of favour, and, although he had been very rich, was impoverished by the fines which the king extorted from him. Perhaps his wealth was his chief offence in the king’s eyes; for he was in attendance on Henry when seized with his last illness. He was the patron of the chronicler Henry of Huntingdon, whom he advanced to an archdeaconry.
BLOET, ROBERT (d. 1123), an English bishop, served as chancellor to William I and Rufus. He received the see of Lincoln in 1093, succeeding Remigius. His private life was mediocre, but he managed his diocese with skill and caution, undertook significant construction projects, and maintained a lavish household, which even served as a training ground for noble sons. Bloet was instrumental in supporting Henry I during the rebellion of 1102 and became the king’s justiciar. However, he later fell out of favor, and despite once being very wealthy, he was impoverished by the fines the king imposed on him. His wealth was likely his biggest issue with the king; he was with Henry during his final illness. He was also the patron of the historian Henry of Huntingdon, who he promoted to an archdeaconry.
Henry of Huntingdon and W. Malmesbury (De Gestis Pontificum) are original authorities. See E.A. Freeman’s William Rufus; Sir James Ramsay, The Foundations of England, vol. ii.
Henry of Huntingdon and W. Malmesbury (De Gestis Pontificum) are primary sources. Check out E.A. Freeman’s William Rufus; Sir James Ramsay, The Foundations of England, vol. ii.
BLOIS, LOUIS DE (1506-1566), Flemish mystical writer, generally known under the name of Blosius, was born in October 1506 at the château of Donstienne, near Liége, of an illustrious family to which several crowned heads were allied. He was educated at the court of the Netherlands with the future emperor Charles V. of Germany, who remained to the last his staunch friend. At the age of fourteen he received the Benedictine habit in the monastery of Liessics in Hainaut, of which he became abbot in 1530. Charles V. pressed in vain upon him the archbishopric of Cambrai, but Blosius studiously exerted himself in the reform of his monastery and in the composition of devotional works. He died at his monastery on the 7th of January 1566.
BLOIS, LOUIS DE (1506-1566), Flemish mystical writer, commonly known as Blosius, was born in October 1506 at the château of Donstienne, near Liège, into a prominent family that was connected to several royal families. He was educated at the court of the Netherlands alongside the future emperor Charles V of Germany, who remained a loyal friend throughout his life. At fourteen, he took the Benedictine habit in the monastery of Liessics in Hainaut, where he became abbot in 1530. Charles V tried in vain to persuade him to accept the archbishopric of Cambrai, but Blosius focused intently on reforming his monastery and writing devotional works. He died at his monastery on January 7, 1566.
Blosius’s works, which were written in Latin, have been translated into almost every European language, and have appealed not only to Roman Catholics, but to many English laymen of note, such as W.E. Gladstone and Lord Coleridge. The best editions of his collected works are the first edition by J. Frojus (Louvain, 1568), and the Cologne reprints (1572, 1587). His best-known works are:—the Institutio Spiritualis (Eng. trans., A Book of Spiritual Instruction, London, 1900); Consolatio Pusillanimium (Eng. trans., Comfort for the Faint-Hearted, London, 1903); Sacellum Animae Fidelis (Eng. trans., The Sanctuary of the Faithful Soul, London, 1905); all these three works were translated and edited by Father Bertrand Wilberforce, O.P., and have been reprinted several times; and especially Speculum Monachorum (French trans. by Félicité de Lamennais, Paris, 1809; Eng. trans., Paris, 1676; re-edited by Lord Coleridge, London, 1871, 1872, and inserted in “Paternoster” series, 1901).
Blosius’s works, originally written in Latin, have been translated into nearly every European language and have attracted not only Roman Catholics but also many notable English laypeople, like W.E. Gladstone and Lord Coleridge. The best editions of his collected works are the first edition by J. Frojus (Louvain, 1568) and the Cologne reprints (1572, 1587). His most famous works include:—the Institutio Spiritualis (Eng. trans., A Book of Spiritual Instruction, London, 1900); Consolatio Pusillanimium (Eng. trans., Comfort for the Faint-Hearted, London, 1903); Sacellum Animae Fidelis (Eng. trans., The Sanctuary of the Faithful Soul, London, 1905); all three of these works were translated and edited by Father Bertrand Wilberforce, O.P., and have been reprinted several times; and especially Speculum Monachorum (French trans. by Félicité de Lamennais, Paris, 1809; Eng. trans., Paris, 1676; re-edited by Lord Coleridge, London, 1871, 1872, and included in the “Paternoster” series, 1901).
See Georges de Blois, Louis de Blois, un Bénédictin au XVIème siècle (Paris, 1875), Eng. trans. by Lady Lovat (London, 1878, &c.).
See Georges de Blois, Louis de Blois, a Benedictine in the 16th Century (Paris, 1875), Eng. trans. by Lady Lovat (London, 1878, &c.).
BLOIS, a town of central France, capital of the department of Loir-et-Cher, 35 m. S.W. of Orleans, on the Orleans railway between that city and Tours. Pop. (1906) 18,457. Situated in a thickly-wooded district on the right bank of the Loire, it covers the summits and slopes of two eminences between which runs the principal thoroughfare of the town named after the philosopher Denis Papin. A bridge of the 18th century from which it presents the appearance of an amphitheatre, unites Blois with the suburb of Vienne on the left bank of the river. The streets of the higher and older part of the town are narrow and tortuous, and in places so steep that means of ascent is provided by flights of steps. The famous château of the family of Orleans (see Architecture: Renaissance Architecture in France), a fine example of Renaissance architecture, stands on the more westerly of the two hills. It consists of three main wings, and a fourth and smaller wing, and is built round a courtyard. The most interesting portion is the north-west wing, which was erected by Francis I., and contains the room where Henry, duke of Guise, was assassinated by order of Henry III. The striking feature of the interior façade is the celebrated spiral staircase tower, the bays of which, with their beautifully sculptured balustrades, project into the courtyard (see Architecture, Plate VIII. fig. 84). The north-east wing, in which is the entrance to the castle, was built by Louis XII. and is called after him; it contains picture-galleries and a museum. Opposite is the Gaston wing, erected by Gaston, duke of Orleans, brother of Louis XIII., which contains a majestic domed staircase. In the north corner of the courtyard is the Salle des États, which, together with the donjon in the west corner, survives from the 13th century. Of the churches of Blois, the cathedral of St Louis, a building of the end of the 17th century, but in Gothic style, is surpassed in interest by St Nicolas, once the church of the abbey of St Laumer, and dating from the 12th and 13th centuries. The picturesqueness of the town is enhanced by many old mansions, the chief of which is the Renaissance Hôtel d’Alluye, and by numerous fountains, among which that named after Louis XII. is of very graceful design. The prefecture, the law court, the corn-market and the fine stud-buildings are among the chief modern buildings.
BLOIS, a town in central France, is the capital of the department of Loir-et-Cher, located 35 miles southwest of Orleans, along the Orleans railway connecting that city to Tours. The population in 1906 was 18,457. It is set in a densely forested area on the right bank of the Loire and spans the peaks and slopes of two hills through which the main road of the town, named after philosopher Denis Papin, runs. An 18th-century bridge gives it an amphitheater-like appearance and connects Blois with the suburb of Vienne on the opposite bank of the river. The streets in the older, higher part of town are narrow and winding, with steep areas serviced by flights of steps. The famous château of the Orleans family (see Architecture: Renaissance Architecture in France), a prime example of Renaissance architecture, sits on the more westerly of the two hills. It features three main wings and a smaller fourth wing, all surrounding a courtyard. The most notable section is the north-west wing, built by Francis I, which houses the room where Henry, Duke of Guise, was murdered on the orders of Henry III. A key highlight of the interior façade is the well-known spiral staircase tower, with its beautifully sculpted balustrades projecting into the courtyard (see Architecture, Plate VIII. fig. 84). The north-east wing, which serves as the castle's entrance, was constructed by Louis XII and is named after him; it includes picture galleries and a museum. Opposite it is the Gaston wing, built by Gaston, Duke of Orleans, brother of Louis XIII, featuring a grand domed staircase. In the north corner of the courtyard stands the Salle des États, along with the donjon in the west corner, both dating back to the 13th century. Among the churches in Blois, the cathedral of St Louis, which was built at the end of the 17th century but in Gothic style, is less interesting than St Nicolas, once part of the abbey of St Laumer, dating from the 12th and 13th centuries. The charm of the town is enhanced by many old residences, the most notable being the Renaissance Hôtel d’Alluye, and numerous fountains, including the elegantly designed fountain named after Louis XII. Key modern buildings include the prefecture, law court, corn market, and impressive stud buildings.
Blois is the seat of a bishop, a prefect, and a court of assizes. It has a tribunal of first instance, a tribunal of commerce, a board of trade arbitration, a branch of the Bank of France, a communal college and training-colleges. The town is a market for the agricultural and pastoral regions of Beauce and Sologne, and has a considerable trade in grain, the wines of the Loire valley, and in horses and other live-stock. It manufactures boots and shoes, biscuits, chocolate, upholstering materials, furniture, machinery and earthenware, and has vinegar-works, breweries, leather-works and foundries.
Blois is the headquarters of a bishop, a prefect, and a court of appeals. It has a district court, a commercial court, a trade arbitration board, a branch of the Bank of France, a community college, and training colleges. The town serves as a market for the agricultural and pastoral areas of Beauce and Sologne, with significant trade in grain, wines from the Loire Valley, and livestock including horses. It manufactures boots and shoes, biscuits, chocolate, upholstery materials, furniture, machinery, and pottery, and has vinegar factories, breweries, leatherworks, and foundries.
Though of ancient origin, Blois is first distinctly mentioned by Gregory of Tours in the 6th century, and was not of any importance till the 9th century, when it became the seat of a powerful countship (see below). In 1196 Count Louis granted privileges to the townsmen; the commune, which survived throughout the middle ages, probably dated from this time. The counts of the Châtillon line resided at Blois more often than their predecessors, and the oldest parts of the chateau (13th century) were built by them. In 1429 Joan of Arc made Blois her base of operations for the relief of Orleans. After his captivity in England, Charles of Orleans in 1440 took up his residence in the château, where in 1462 his son, afterwards Louis XII., was born. In the 16th century Blois was often the resort of the French court. Its inhabitants included many Calvinists, and it was in 1562 and 1567 the scene of struggles between them and the supporters of the Roman church. In 1576 and 1588 Henry III., king of France, chose Blois as the meeting-place of the states-general, and in the latter year he brought about the murders of Henry, duke of Guise, and his brother, Louis, archbishop of Reims and cardinal, in the château, where their deaths were shortly followed by that of the queen-mother, Catherine de’ Medici. From 1617 to 1619 Marie de’ Medici, wife of King Henry IV., exiled from the court, lived at the château, which was soon afterwards given by Louis XIII. to his brother Gaston, duke of Orleans, who lived there till his death in 1660. The bishopric dates from the end of the 17th century. In 1814 Blois was for a short time the seat of the regency of Marie Louise, wife of Napoleon I.
Though it has ancient roots, Blois is first clearly mentioned by Gregory of Tours in the 6th century and wasn't significant until the 9th century, when it became the center of a powerful countship (see below). In 1196, Count Louis granted privileges to the townspeople; the commune that lasted through the Middle Ages likely started around this time. The counts of the Châtillon line lived in Blois more frequently than their predecessors, and they built the oldest parts of the château in the 13th century. In 1429, Joan of Arc made Blois her base for the campaign to relieve Orleans. After his capture in England, Charles of Orleans took up residence in the château in 1440, where his son, who later became Louis XII, was born in 1462. During the 16th century, Blois was often a favorite spot for the French court. Its residents included many Calvinists, and in 1562 and 1567, it was the site of conflicts between them and the followers of the Roman church. In 1576 and 1588, Henry III, king of France, chose Blois as the meeting place for the states-general, and in the latter year, he orchestrated the murders of Henry, duke of Guise, and his brother, Louis, archbishop of Reims and cardinal, in the château, shortly followed by the death of the queen-mother, Catherine de’ Medici. From 1617 to 1619, Marie de’ Medici, wife of King Henry IV, lived in the château after being exiled from the court, which was soon given by Louis XIII to his brother Gaston, duke of Orleans, who lived there until his death in 1660. The bishopric dates back to the end of the 17th century. In 1814, Blois briefly served as the seat of the regency of Marie Louise, wife of Napoleon I.
See L. de la Saussaye, Blois et ses environs (1873); Histoire du château de Blois (1873); L. Bergevin et A. Dupré, Histoire de Blois (1847).
See L. de la Saussaye, Blois and Its Surroundings (1873); History of the Château de Blois (1873); L. Bergevin and A. Dupré, History of Blois (1847).
BLOIS, Countship of. From 865 to about 940 the countship of Blois was one of those which were held in fee by the margrave of Neustria, Robert the Strong, and by his successors, the abbot Hugh, Odo (or Eudes), Robert II. and Hugh the Great. It then passed, about 940 and for nearly three centuries, to a new family of counts, whose chiefs, at first vassals of the dukes of France, Hugh the Great and Hugh Capet, became in 987, by the accession of the Capetian dynasty to the throne of France, the direct vassals of the crown. These new counts were orjginally very powerful. With the countship of Blois they united, from 940 to 1044, that of Touraine, and from about 950 to 1218, and afterwards from 1269 to 1286, the countship of Chartres remained in their possession.
BLOIS, Countship of. From 865 to around 940, the countship of Blois was one of the territories held by the margrave of Neustria, Robert the Strong, and by his successors, Abbot Hugh, Odo (or Eudes), Robert II, and Hugh the Great. It then transferred, around 940 and for almost three centuries, to a new family of counts. Initially, these counts were vassals of the dukes of France, Hugh the Great and Hugh Capet. However, in 987, with the rise of the Capetian dynasty to the French throne, they became direct vassals of the crown. These new counts were originally quite powerful. Along with the countship of Blois, they also held the countship of Touraine from 940 to 1044 and managed to retain the countship of Chartres from about 950 to 1218, and again from 1269 to 1286.
The counts of Blois of the house of the Theobalds (Thibauds) began with Theobald I., the Cheat, who became count about 940. He was succeeded by his son, Odo (Eudes) I., about 975. Theobald II., eldest son of Odo I., became count in 996, and was succeeded by Odo II., younger son of Odo I., about 1005. Odo II. was one of the most warlike barons of his time. With the already considerable domains which he held from his ancestors, he united the heritage of his kinsman, Stephen I., count of Troyes. In 1033 he disputed the crown of Burgundy with the emperor, Conrad the Salic, and perished in 1037 while fighting in Lorraine. He was succeeded in 1037 by his eldest son, Theobald III., who was defeated by the Angevins in 1044, and was forced to give up the town of Tours and its dependencies to the count of Anjou. In 1089 Stephen Henry, eldest son of Theobald III., became count. He took part in the first crusade, fell into the hands of the Saracens, and died in captivity; he married Adela, daughter of William I., king of England. In 1102 Stephen Henry was succeeded by his son, Theobald IV. the Great, who united the countship of Troyes with his domains 76 in 1128. In 1135, on the death of his maternal uncle, Henry I., king of England, he was called to Normandy by the barons of the duchy, but soon renounced his claims on learning that his younger brother, Stephen, had just been proclaimed king of England. In 1152 Theobald V. the Good, second son of Theobald IV., became count; he died in 1191 in Syria, at the siege of Acre. His son Louis succeeded in 1191, took part in the fourth crusade, and after the taking of Constantinople was rewarded with the duchy of Nicaea. He was killed at the battle of Adrianople in 1205, in which year he was succeeded by his son, Theobald VI. the Young, who died childless. In 1218 the countship passed to Margaret, eldest daughter of Theobald V., and to Walter (Gautier) of Avesnes, her third husband.
The counts of Blois from the house of the Theobalds (Thibauds) started with Theobald I., known as The Cheat, who became count around 940. He was succeeded by his son, Odo (Eudes) I., around 975. Theobald II., the oldest son of Odo I., became count in 996 and was followed by Odo II., the younger son of Odo I., around 1005. Odo II. was one of the most aggressive barons of his time. With the considerable lands he inherited from his ancestors, he added the inheritance of his relative, Stephen I., count of Troyes. In 1033, he contested the crown of Burgundy with Emperor Conrad the Salic and died in 1037 while fighting in Lorraine. His eldest son, Theobald III., succeeded him in 1037 but was defeated by the Angevins in 1044, forcing him to surrender the town of Tours and its territories to the count of Anjou. In 1089, Stephen Henry, the eldest son of Theobald III., became count. He participated in the First Crusade, was captured by the Saracens, and died in captivity; he married Adela, the daughter of William I, king of England. In 1102, Stephen Henry was succeeded by his son, Theobald IV. the Great, who combined the countship of Troyes with his own territories in 1128. In 1135, after the death of his maternal uncle, Henry I., king of England, he was summoned to Normandy by the barons of the duchy but quickly renounced his claims when he found out his younger brother, Stephen, had just been declared king of England. In 1152, Theobald V. the Good, the second son of Theobald IV., became count; he died in 1191 in Syria during the siege of Acre. His son Louis succeeded him in 1191, participated in the Fourth Crusade, and received the duchy of Nicaea after the capture of Constantinople. He was killed at the battle of Adrianople in 1205, the same year he was succeeded by his son, Theobald VI. the Young, who died without children. In 1218, the countship passed to Margaret, the eldest daughter of Theobald V., and to Walter (Gautier) of Avesnes, her third husband.
The Châtillon branch of the counts of Blois began in 1230 with Mary of Avesnes, daughter of Margaret of Blois and her husband, Hugh of Châtillon, count of St Pol. In 1241 her brother, John of Châtillon, became count of Blois, and was succeeded in 1279 by his daughter, Joan of Châtillon, who married Peter, count of Alençon, fifth son of Louis IX., king of France. In 1286 Joan sold the countship of Chartres to the king of France. Hugh of Châtillon, her first-cousin, became count of Blois in 1293, and was succeeded by his son, Guy I., in 1307. In 1342 Louis II., eldest son of Guy I., died at the battle of Crécy, and his brother, Charles of Blois, disputed the duchy of Brittany with John of Montfort. Louis III., eldest son of Louis II., became count in 1346, and was succeeded by John II., second son of Louis II., in 1372. In 1381 Guy II., brother of Louis III. and John II., succeeded in 1381, but died childless. Overwhelmed with debt, he had sold the countship of Blois to Louis I., duke of Orleans, brother of King Charles VI., who took possession of it in 1397.
The Châtillon branch of the counts of Blois started in 1230 with Mary of Avesnes, daughter of Margaret of Blois and her husband, Hugh of Châtillon, count of St Pol. In 1241, her brother, John of Châtillon, became count of Blois and was succeeded in 1279 by his daughter, Joan of Châtillon, who married Peter, count of Alençon, the fifth son of Louis IX, king of France. In 1286, Joan sold the countship of Chartres to the king of France. Hugh of Châtillon, her first cousin, became count of Blois in 1293 and was succeeded by his son, Guy I, in 1307. In 1342, Louis II, the eldest son of Guy I, died at the battle of Crécy, and his brother, Charles of Blois, contested the duchy of Brittany with John of Montfort. Louis III, the eldest son of Louis II, became count in 1346 and was succeeded by John II, the second son of Louis II, in 1372. In 1381, Guy II, the brother of Louis III and John II, took over but died without children. Overwhelmed with debt, he sold the countship of Blois to Louis I, duke of Orleans, the brother of King Charles VI, who took possession of it in 1397.
In 1498 the countship of Blois was united with the crown by the accession of King Louis XII., grandson and second successor of Louis I., duke of Orleans.
In 1498, the county of Blois was merged with the crown when King Louis XII, the grandson and second successor of Louis I, Duke of Orleans, came to power.
See Bernier, Histoire de Blois (1682); La Saussaye, Histoire de la ville de Blois (1846).
See Bernier, Histoire de Blois (1682); La Saussaye, Histoire de la ville de Blois (1846).
BLOMEFIELD, FRANCIS (1705-1752), English topographer of the county of Norfolk, was born at Fersfield, Norfolk, on the 23rd of July 1705. On leaving Cambridge in 1727 he was ordained, becoming in 1729 rector of Hargham, Norfolk, and immediately afterwards rector of Fersfield, his father’s family living. In 1733 he mooted the idea of a history of Norfolk, for which he had begun collecting material at the age of fifteen, and shortly afterwards, while collecting further information for his book, discovered some of the famous Paston Letters. By 1736 he was ready to put some of the results of his researches into type. At the end of 1739 the first volume of the History of Norfolk was completed. It was printed at the author’s own press, bought specially for the purpose. The second volume was ready in 1745. There is little doubt that in compiling his book Blomefield had frequent recourse to the existing historical collections of Le Neve, Kirkpatrick and Tanner, his own work being to a large extent one of expansion and addition. To Le Neve in particular a large share of the credit is due. When half-way through his third volume, Blomefield, who had come up to London in connexion with a special piece of research, caught smallpox, of which he died on the 16th of January 1752. The remainder of his work was published posthumously, and the whole eleven volumes were republished in London between 1805 and 1810.
BLOMEFIELD, FRANCIS (1705-1752), was an English topographer from Norfolk. He was born in Fersfield, Norfolk, on July 23, 1705. After leaving Cambridge in 1727, he was ordained and became the rector of Hargham, Norfolk, in 1729, and shortly after that, the rector of Fersfield, which was his father's family church. In 1733, he proposed writing a history of Norfolk, having started collecting material for it when he was just fifteen. Soon after, while gathering more information for his book, he discovered some of the famous Paston Letters. By 1736, he was ready to print some of the findings from his research. At the end of 1739, he completed the first volume of the History of Norfolk, which he printed at his own press that he had purchased specifically for this purpose. The second volume was ready in 1745. It's widely believed that while compiling his book, Blomefield often relied on the historical collections of Le Neve, Kirkpatrick, and Tanner, with his own work largely being an expansion and addition to theirs. In particular, a significant portion of the credit belongs to Le Neve. While working on his third volume in London for a special research project, Blomefield contracted smallpox and died on January 16, 1752. The rest of his work was published after his death, and all eleven volumes were republished in London between 1805 and 1810.
BLOMFIELD, SIR ARTHUR WILLIAM (1829-1899), English architect, son of Bishop C.J. Blomfield, was born on the 6th of March 1829, and educated at Rugby and Trinity, Cambridge. He was then articled as an architect to P.C. Hardwick, and subsequently obtained a large practice on his own account. He became president of the Architectural Association in 1861, and a fellow (1867) and vice-president (1886) of the Royal Institute of British Architects. In 1887 he became architect to the Bank of England, and designed the law courts branch in Fleet Street, and he was associated with A.E. Street in the building of the law courts. In 1889 he was knighted. He died on the 30th of October 1899. He was twice married, and brought up two sons, Charles J. Blomfield and Arthur Conran Blomfield, to his own profession, of which they became distinguished representatives. Among the numerous churches which Sir Arthur Blomfield designed, his work at St Saviour’s, Southwark, is a notable example of his use of revived Gothic, and he was highly regarded as a restorer.
BLOMFIELD, SIR ARTHUR WILLIAM (1829-1899), English architect, son of Bishop C.J. Blomfield, was born on March 6, 1829, and educated at Rugby and Trinity, Cambridge. He began his career as an architectural apprentice to P.C. Hardwick and later built a successful practice on his own. He served as president of the Architectural Association in 1861 and became a fellow (1867) and vice-president (1886) of the Royal Institute of British Architects. In 1887, he was appointed architect to the Bank of England and designed the law courts branch in Fleet Street, collaborating with A.E. Street on the building of the law courts. He was knighted in 1889 and passed away on October 30, 1899. He was married twice and raised two sons, Charles J. Blomfield and Arthur Conran Blomfield, who also pursued careers in architecture and became well-known in the field. Among the many churches designed by Sir Arthur Blomfield, his work at St Saviour’s, Southwark, stands out as a significant example of his revival of Gothic style, and he was highly regarded as a restorer.
BLOMFIELD, CHARLES JAMES (1786-1857), English divine, was born on the 29th of May 1786 at Bury St Edmunds. He was educated at the local grammar school and at Trinity College, Cambridge, where he gained the Browne medals for Latin and Greek odes, and carried off the Craven scholarship. In 1808 he graduated as third wrangler and first medallist, and in the following year was elected to a fellowship at Trinity College. The first-fruits of his scholarship was an edition of the Prometheus of Aeschylus in 1810; this was followed by editions of the Septem contra Thebas, Persae, Choephorae, and Agamemnon, of Callimachus, and of the fragments of Sappho, Sophron and Alcaeus. Blomfield, however, soon ceased to devote himself entirely to scholarship. He had been ordained in 1810, and held in quick succession the livings of Chesterford, Quarrington, Dunton, Great and Little Chesterford, and Tuddenham. In 1817 he was appointed private chaplain to Wm. Howley, bishop of London. In 1819 he was nominated to the rich living of St Botolph’s, Bishopsgate, and in 1822 he became archdeacon of Colchester. Two years later he was raised to the bishopric of Chester where he carried through many much-needed reforms. In 1828 he was translated to the bishopric of London, which he held for twenty-eight years. During this period his energy and zeal did much to extend the influence of the church. He was one of the best debaters in the House of Lords, took a leading position in the action for church reform which culminated in the ecclesiastical commission, and did much for the extension of the colonial episcopate; and his genial and kindly nature made him an invaluable mediator in the controversies arising out of the tractarian movement. His health at last gave way, and in 1856 he was permitted to resign his bishopric, retaining Fulham Palace as his residence, with a pension of £6000 per annum. He died on the 5th of August 1857. His published works, exclusive of those above mentioned, consist of charges, sermons, lectures and pamphlets, and of a Manual of Private and Family Prayers. He was a frequent contributor to the quarterly reviews, chiefly on classical subjects.
BLOMFIELD, CHARLES JAMES (1786-1857), English clergyman, was born on May 29, 1786, in Bury St Edmunds. He went to the local grammar school and then Trinity College, Cambridge, where he won the Browne medals for Latin and Greek odes and secured the Craven scholarship. In 1808, he graduated as third wrangler and first medallist, and the next year, he was elected to a fellowship at Trinity College. The first outcome of his scholarship was an edition of the Prometheus by Aeschylus in 1810; this was followed by editions of Septem contra Thebas, Persae, Choephorae, and Agamemnon, as well as works by Callimachus and fragments of Sappho, Sophron, and Alcaeus. However, Blomfield soon shifted his focus away from scholarship. He was ordained in 1810 and quickly took on the parishes of Chesterford, Quarrington, Dunton, Great and Little Chesterford, and Tuddenham. In 1817, he was appointed private chaplain to Wm. Howley, the bishop of London. In 1819, he was given the wealthy parish of St Botolph’s, Bishopsgate, and in 1822 he became archdeacon of Colchester. Two years later, he was promoted to the bishopric of Chester, where he implemented many much-needed reforms. In 1828, he was moved to the bishopric of London, a position he held for twenty-eight years. During this time, his energy and enthusiasm significantly expanded the church's influence. He was one of the best debaters in the House of Lords, took a leading role in the campaign for church reform that led to the establishment of the ecclesiastical commission, and contributed to the growth of the colonial episcopate. His friendly and kind nature made him a vital mediator in the disputes stemming from the tractarian movement. Eventually, his health declined, and in 1856, he was allowed to resign from his bishopric, retaining Fulham Palace as his residence along with a pension of £6000 per year. He died on August 5, 1857. His published works, apart from those mentioned earlier, include charges, sermons, lectures, and pamphlets, as well as a Manual of Private and Family Prayers. He frequently contributed to quarterly reviews, mainly on classical topics.
See Memoirs of Charles James Blomfield, D.D., Bishop of London, with Selections from his Correspondence, edited by his son, Alfred Blomfield (1863); G.E. Biber, Bishop Blomfield and his Times (1857).
See Memoirs of Charles James Blomfield, D.D., Bishop of London, with Selections from his Correspondence, edited by his son, Alfred Blomfield (1863); G.E. Biber, Bishop Blomfield and his Times (1857).
BLOMFIELD, EDWARD VALENTINE (1788-1816), English classical scholar, brother of Bishop C.J. Blomfield, was born at Bury St Edmunds on the 14th of February 1788. Going to Caius College, Cambridge, he was thirteenth wrangler in 1811, obtained several of the classical prizes of the university, and became a fellow and lecturer at Emmanuel College. In 1813 he travelled in Germany and made the acquaintance of some of the great scholars of Germany. On his return, he published in the Museum Criticum (No. ii.) an interesting paper on “The Present State of Classical Literature in Germany.” Blomfield is chiefly known by his translation of Matthiae’s Greek Grammar (1819), which was prepared for the press by his brother. He died on the 9th of October 1816, his early death depriving Cambridge of one who seemed destined to take a high place amongst her most brilliant classical scholars.
BLOMFIELD, EDWARD VALENTINE (1788-1816), English classical scholar and brother of Bishop C.J. Blomfield, was born in Bury St Edmunds on February 14, 1788. He attended Caius College, Cambridge, where he ranked thirteenth wrangler in 1811, won several classical prizes at the university, and became a fellow and lecturer at Emmanuel College. In 1813, he traveled to Germany and met some of the country's prominent scholars. Upon returning, he published an interesting paper in the Museum Criticum (No. ii.) titled “The Present State of Classical Literature in Germany.” Blomfield is mainly recognized for his translation of Matthiae’s Greek Grammar (1819), which was prepared for publication by his brother. He died on October 9, 1816, and his untimely death deprived Cambridge of someone who appeared destined to achieve a prominent position among its brightest classical scholars.
See “Memoir of Edward Valentine Blomfield,” by Bishop Monk, in Museum Criticum, No. vii.
See “Memoir of Edward Valentine Blomfield,” by Bishop Monk, in Museum Criticum, No. vii.
BLONDEL, DAVID (1591-1655), French Protestant clergyman, was born at Châlons-sur-Marne in 1591, and died on the 6th of April 1655. In 1650 he succeeded G.J. Vossius in the professorship of history at Amsterdam. His works were very numerous; in some of them he showed a remarkable critical faculty, as in his dissertation on Pope Joan (1647, 1657), in which he came to the conclusion, now universally accepted, that the whole story is a mere myth. Considerable Protestant indignation was excited against him on account of this book.
BLONDEL, DAVID (1591-1655), French Protestant clergyman, was born in Châlons-sur-Marne in 1591 and died on April 6, 1655. In 1650, he took over G.J. Vossius's professorship of history at Amsterdam. He wrote many works; in some, he displayed a notable critical ability, like in his dissertation on Pope Joan (1647, 1657), where he concluded, now widely accepted, that the entire story is just a myth. His book stirred significant Protestant outrage against him.
BLONDEL, JACQUES FRANÇOIS (1705-1774), French architect, began life as an architectural engraver, but developed into an architect of considerable distinction, if of no great 77 originality. As architect to Louis XV. from 1755 he necessarily did much in the rococo manner, although it would seem that he conformed to fashion rather than to artistic conviction. He was among the earliest founders of schools of architecture in France, and for this he was distinguished by the Academy; but he is now best remembered by his voluminous work L’Architecture française, in which he was the continuator of Marot. The book is a precious collection of views of famous buildings, many of which have disappeared or been remodelled.
BLONDEL, JACQUES FRANÇOIS (1705-1774), a French architect, started out as an architectural engraver but became a well-regarded architect, even if not particularly original. As the architect for Louis XV from 1755, he primarily worked in the rococo style, though it appears he followed trends more than personal artistic beliefs. He was one of the early founders of architecture schools in France, which earned him recognition from the Academy; however, he is now mostly remembered for his extensive work L’Architecture française, where he continued the work of Marot. The book is a valuable collection of images of famous buildings, many of which have since been lost or changed. 77
BLONDIN (1824-1897), French tight-rope walker and acrobat, was born at St Omer, France, on the 28th of February 1824. His real name was Jean François Gravelet. When five years old he was sent to the École de Gymnase at Lyons and, after six months’ training as an acrobat, made his first public appearance as “The Little Wonder.” His superior skill and grace as well as the originality of the settings of his acts, made him a popular favourite. He especially owed his celebrity and fortune to his idea of crossing Niagara Falls on a tight-rope, 1100 ft. long, 160 ft. above the water. This he accomplished, first in 1859, a number of times, always with different theatric variations: blindfold, in a sack, trundling a wheelbarrow, on stilts, carrying a man on his back, sitting down midway while he made and ate an omelette. In 1861 Blondin first appeared in London, at the Crystal Palace, turning somersaults on stilts on a rope stretched across the central transept, 170 ft. from the ground. In 1862 he again gave a series of performances at the Crystal Palace, and elsewhere in England, and on the continent. After a period of retirement he reappeared in 1880, his final performance being given at Belfast in 1896. He died at Ealing, London, on the 19th of February 1897.
BLONDIN (1824-1897), a French tightrope walker and acrobat, was born in St Omer, France, on February 28, 1824. His real name was Jean François Gravelet. At five years old, he was sent to the École de Gymnase in Lyons and, after six months of training as an acrobat, made his first public appearance as “The Little Wonder.” His exceptional skill and grace, along with the creative setups for his acts, made him a popular favorite. He particularly gained fame and fortune for his idea of crossing Niagara Falls on a tightrope, which was 1,100 feet long and 160 feet above the water. He first completed this feat in 1859 several times, each with different theatrical twists: blindfolded, in a sack, pushing a wheelbarrow, on stilts, carrying a man on his back, and even sitting down halfway through to make and eat an omelette. In 1861, Blondin debuted in London at the Crystal Palace, performing somersaults on stilts on a rope stretched across the central transept, 170 feet up. In 1862, he once again performed a series of shows at the Crystal Palace and other venues in England and Europe. After a brief retirement, he returned in 1880, with his final performance taking place in Belfast in 1896. He passed away in Ealing, London, on February 19, 1897.
BLOOD, the circulating fluid in the veins and arteries of animals. The word itself is common to Teutonic languages; the O. Eng. is blód, cf. Gothic bloth, Dutch bloed, Ger. Blut. It is probably ultimately connected with the root which appears in “blow,” “bloom,” meaning flourishing or vigorous. The Gr. word for blood, αἷμα, appears as a prefix haemo- in many compound words. As that on which the life depends, as the supposed seat of the passions and emotions, and as that part which a child is believed chiefly to inherit from its parents, the word “blood” is used in many figurative and transferred senses; thus “to have his blood,” “to fire the blood,” “cold blood,” “blood-royal,” “half” or “whole blood,” &c. The expression “blue blood” is from the Spanish sangre azul. The nobles of Castile claimed to be free from all admixture with the darker blood of Moors or Jews, a proof being supposed to lie in the blue veins that showed in their fairer skins. The common English expletive “bloody,” used as an adjective or adverb, has been given many fanciful origins; it has been supposed to be a contraction of “by our Lady,” or an adaptation of the oath common during the 17th century, “’sblood,” a contraction of “God’s blood.” The exact origin of the expression is not quite clear, but it is certainly merely an application of the adjective formed from “blood.” The New English Dictionary suggests that it refers to the use of “blood” for a young rowdy of aristocratic birth, which was common at the end of the 17th century, and later became synonymous with “dandy,” “buck,” &c.; “bloody drunk” meant therefore “drunk as a blood,” “drunk as a lord.” The expression came into common colloquial use as a mere intensive, and was so used till the middle of the 18th century. There can be little doubt that the use of the word has been considerably affected by the idea of blood as the vital principle, and therefore something strong, vigorous, and parallel as an intensive epithet with such expressions as “thundering,” “awfully” and the like.
BLOOD, the fluid that travels through the veins and arteries of animals. The term is found in Teutonic languages; the Old English term is blód, similar to the Gothic bloth, Dutch bloed, and German Blut. It’s likely related to the root seen in “blow” and “bloom,” which indicate flourishing or vitality. The Greek word for blood, blood, appears as a prefix haemo- in many compound words. Since it represents what sustains life, is thought to be the source of passions and emotions, and is the part that a child is believed to mainly inherit from their parents, the term “blood” is used in various figurative ways, such as “to have his blood,” “to fire the blood,” “cold blood,” “blood-royal,” “half” or “whole blood,” etc. The phrase “blue blood” comes from the Spanish sangre azul. The nobles of Castile claimed to have no mixing with the darker blood of Moors or Jews, proving their status by the blue veins visible on their lighter skin. The common English expletive “bloody,” used as an adjective or adverb, has many imaginative origins; it’s thought to be a shortened form of “by our Lady,” or derived from the 17th-century oath “’sblood,” a shortening of “God’s blood.” The precise origin of the term isn't completely clear, but it seems to be a straightforward application of the adjective from “blood.” The New English Dictionary suggests it may reference the use of “blood” for a young troublemaker of noble birth, which was popular in the late 17th century, later becoming synonymous with “dandy” or “buck.” “Bloody drunk” therefore meant “drunk as a blood” or “drunk as a lord.” The term entered everyday language as an intensifier and was commonly used until the mid-18th century. There is little doubt that the meaning of the word has been heavily influenced by the notion of blood as the essential life force, thus something potent, vigorous, and serving as an intense descriptor like “thundering,” “awfully,” and similar expressions.
Anatomy and Physiology
Anatomy and Physiology
In all living organisms, except the most minute, only a minimum number of cells can come into immediate contact with the general world, whence is to be drawn the food supply for the whole organism. Hence those cells—and they are by far the most numerous—which do not lie on the food-absorbing surface, must gain their nutriment by some indirect means. Further, each living cell produces waste products whose accumulation would speedily prove injurious to the cell, hence they must be constantly removed from its immediate neighbourhood and indeed from the organism as a whole. In this instance again, only a few cells can lie on a surface whence such materials can be directly discharged to the exterior. Hence the main number of the cells of the organism must depend upon some mechanism by which the waste products can be carried away from them to that group of cells whose duty it is to modify them, or discharge them from the body. These two ends are attained by the aid of a circulating fluid, a fluid which is constantly flowing past every cell of the body. From it the cells extract the food materials they require for their sustenance, and into it they discharge the waste materials resulting from their activity. This circulating medium is the blood.
In all living organisms, except the very tiny ones, only a small number of cells can directly interact with the outside world to get the food needed for the entire organism. Therefore, those cells—which are the majority—do not sit on the food-absorbing surface and must obtain their nutrients through indirect means. Additionally, every living cell produces waste products that would quickly harm the cell if they built up, so these wastes need to be continuously removed from its immediate area and from the organism as a whole. Once again, only a few cells can be positioned on a surface where such materials can be directly expelled to the outside. As a result, most cells in the organism rely on a system to carry waste products away from them to the group of cells responsible for processing or eliminating them from the body. Both of these tasks are achieved with the help of a circulating fluid, which continuously flows past every cell in the body. Cells take the nutrients they need for energy from this fluid and release their waste products into it. This circulating medium is the blood.
Whilst undoubtedly the two functions of this circulating fluid above given are the more prominent, there are yet others of great importance. For instance, it is known that many tissues as a result of their activity produce certain chemical substances which are of essential importance to the life of other tissue cells. These substances—internal secretions as they are termed—are carried to the second tissue by the blood stream. Again, many instances are known in which two distant tissues communicate with one another by means of chemical messengers, bodies termed hormones (ὁρμάειν, to stir up), which are produced by one group of cells, and sent to the other group to excite them to activity. Here, also, the path by which such messengers travel is the blood stream. A further and most important manner in which the circulating fluid is utilized in the life of an animal is seen in the way in which it is employed in protecting the body should it be invaded by micro-organisms.
While the two main functions of this circulating fluid mentioned above are the most prominent, there are others that are also very important. For example, it’s known that many tissues produce certain chemical substances due to their activity, which are essential for the survival of other tissue cells. These substances—referred to as internal secretions—are transported to other tissues by the bloodstream. Additionally, there are many cases where two distant tissues communicate with each other through chemical messengers called hormones (launch, to stir up), which are produced by one group of cells and sent to another group to stimulate their activity. In this case, the bloodstream is also the route that these messengers take. Another crucial way the circulating fluid supports an animal's life is in protecting the body against invasion by microorganisms.
Hence it is clear that the blood is of the most vital importance to the healthy life of the body. But the fact that it is present as a circulating medium exposes the animal to a great danger, viz. that it may be lost should any vessel carrying it become ruptured. This is constantly liable to happen, but to minimize as far as possible any such loss, the blood is endowed with the peculiar property of clotting, i.e. of setting to a solid or stiff jelly by means of which the orifices of the torn vessels become plugged and the bleeding stayed.
It’s clear that blood is essential for a healthy body. However, because it circulates, animals face a significant risk: they could lose it if a blood vessel gets damaged. This can happen at any time, but to reduce the risk of such loss, blood has a unique ability to clot, i.e. to solidify into a stiff jelly that plugs the openings of torn vessels and stops the bleeding.
The performance of these essential functions depends upon the maintenance of a continuous flow past all tissue cells, and this is attained by the circulatory mechanism, consisting of a central pump, the heart, and a system of ramifying tubes, the arteries, through which the blood is forced from the heart to every tissue (see Vascular System). A second set of tubes, the veins, collects the blood and returns it to the heart. In many invertebrates the circulating fluid is actually poured into the tissue spaces from the open terminals of the arteries. From these spaces it is in turn drained away by the veins. Such a system is termed a haemolymph system and the circulating fluid the haemolymph. Here the essential point gained is that the fluid is brought into direct contact with the tissue cells. In all vertebrates, the ends of the arteries are united to the commencements of the veins by a plexus of extremely minute tubes, the capillaries, consequently the blood is always retained within closed tubes and never comes into contact with the tissue cells. It is while passing through the capillaries that the blood performs its work; here the blood stream is at its slowest and is brought nearest to the tissue cell, only being separated from it by the extremely thin wall of the capillary and by an equally thin layer of fluid. Through this narrow barrier the interchanges between cell and blood take place.
The performance of these essential functions relies on maintaining a continuous flow past all tissue cells, which is achieved through the circulatory system. This system consists of a central pump, the heart, and a network of branching tubes, the arteries, that push blood from the heart to every tissue (see Vascular System). A second set of tubes, the veins, gathers the blood and brings it back to the heart. In many invertebrates, the circulating fluid is actually poured into tissue spaces from the open ends of the arteries. The veins then drain this fluid away from those spaces. This setup is called a haemolymph system, and the circulating fluid is known as haemolymph. The key point here is that the fluid directly contacts the tissue cells. In all vertebrates, the ends of the arteries connect to the beginnings of the veins through a network of very tiny tubes called capillaries. As a result, the blood remains contained within closed tubes and never directly contacts the tissue cells. It is during its passage through the capillaries that the blood does its work; here, the blood flow is at its slowest and closest to the tissue cells, separated only by the very thin wall of the capillary and a similarly thin layer of fluid. Through this narrow barrier, exchanges between the cells and the blood occur.
The advantage gained in the vertebrate animal by retaining the blood in a closed system of tubes lies in the great diminution of resistance to the flow of blood, and the consequent great increase in rate of flow past the tissue cells. Hence any food stuffs which can travel quickly through the capillary wall to the tissue cell outside can be supplied in proportionately greater quantity within a given time, without requiring any very great increase in the concentration of that substance in the blood. Conversely, any highly diffusible substance may be withdrawn 78 from the tissues by the blood at a similarly increased pace. These conditions are more peculiarly of importance for the supply of oxygen and the removal of carbonic acid-especially for the former, because the amount of it which can be carried by the blood is small. But as the rate at which a tissue lives, i.e. its activity, depends upon the rate of its chemical reactions, and as these are fundamentally oxidative, the more rapidly oxygen is carried to a tissue the more rapidly it can live, and the greater the amount of work it can perform within a given time. The rate of supply is of much less importance in the case of the other food substances because they are far more soluble in water, so that the supply in sufficient quantity can easily be met by a relatively slow blood flow. Hence we find that the gradual evolution of the animal kingdom goes hand in hand with the gradual development of a greater oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood and an increase in the rate of its flow.
The benefit of keeping blood in a closed system of vessels in vertebrate animals is that it significantly reduces resistance to blood flow and greatly increases the speed at which blood moves past tissue cells. This means that nutrients can quickly pass through the capillary walls to reach the tissue cells outside, allowing for a larger supply within a certain time frame, without needing a big increase in the concentration of those substances in the blood. On the other hand, any easily diffusable substances can also be extracted from the tissues by the blood at a similarly faster rate. These factors are particularly important for delivering oxygen and removing carbon dioxide—especially for oxygen, since the amount that blood can carry is limited. As the rate at which a tissue functions, or its activity, relies on how fast its chemical reactions occur, and since these reactions primarily involve oxidation, the quicker oxygen is supplied to a tissue, the more active it can be and the more work it can accomplish in a set time. The speed of supply is less critical for other nutrients because they dissolve more easily in water, so adequate amounts can be delivered with a slower blood flow. This explains why the gradual evolution of the animal kingdom is closely linked to the development of the blood's capacity to carry oxygen and an increase in the speed of its flow.
In the groundwork of a tissue are a number of spaces—the tissue spaces. They are filled with fluid and intercommunicate freely, finally connecting with a number of fine tubes, the lymphatics, through which excess of fluid or any solid particles present are drained away. The contained fluid acts as an intermediary between the blood and the cell; from it, the cell takes its various food stuffs, these having in the first instance been derived from the blood, and into it the cell discharges its waste products. On the course of the lymphatics a number of typical structures, the lymphatic glands, are placed, and the lymph has to pass through these structures where any deleterious products are retained, and the fluid thus purified is drained away by further lymphatics and finally returned to the blood. Thus there is a second stream of fluid from the tissues, but one vastly slower than that of the blood. The flow is too slow for it to act as the vehicle for the removal of those waste products (carbonic acid, &c.) which must of necessity be removed quickly. These must be removed by the blood. The same is true for the main number of other waste products, which, however, being of small molecular size are readily absorbed into the blood stream.
In the structure of a tissue, there are several spaces—the tissue spaces. These spaces are filled with fluid and are interconnected, eventually linking up with fine tubes called lymphatics, which drain away excess fluid or any solid particles present. The fluid acts as a bridge between the blood and the cells; the cells take in various nutrients from it, which originally came from the blood, and it’s also where they release their waste products. Along the lymphatic pathways, there are several typical structures known as lymphatic glands, where the lymph must pass through. These glands retain any harmful substances, and the purified fluid is then drained away through additional lymphatics and ultimately returned to the blood. This means there’s a second flow of fluid from the tissues, but it moves much slower than the blood. This slower flow isn't fast enough to remove waste products like carbon dioxide that need to be eliminated quickly; that job falls to the blood. The same goes for most other waste products, which, being small in molecular size, can easily be absorbed into the bloodstream.
But in addition to fluid, the tissue spaces may at times be found to contain solid matter in the form of particles, which may represent the debris of destroyed cells, or which are, as is quite commonly the case, micro-organisms. Apparently such material cannot be removed from a tissue by absorption into the blood stream—indeed in the case of living organisms such an absorption would in many instances rapidly prove fatal, and special provision is made to prevent such an accident. These, therefore, are made to travel along the lymphatic channels, and so, before gaining access to the blood stream and thus to the body generally, have to run the gauntlet of the protective mechanism provided by the lymphatic glands, where in the major number of cases they are readily destroyed.
But besides fluid, the tissue spaces may sometimes contain solid particles, which could be debris from destroyed cells or, as is often the case, micro-organisms. It seems that this material cannot be absorbed into the bloodstream; in fact, for living organisms, such absorption could often be fatal, so there are special measures in place to prevent this from happening. Therefore, these particles travel through the lymphatic channels, and before entering the bloodstream and the body at large, they have to go through the protective mechanism of the lymphatic glands, where, in most cases, they are quickly destroyed.
Hence we see that first and foremost we have to regard the blood as a food-carrier to all the cells of the body; in the second place as the vehicle carrying away most if not all the waste products; in a third direction, it is acting as a means for transmitting chemical substances manufactured in one tissue to distant cells of the body for whose nutrition or excitation they may be essential; and in addition to these important functions there is yet another whose value it is almost impossible to overestimate, for it plays the essential rôle in rendering the animal immune to the attacks of invading organisms. The question of immunity is discussed elsewhere, and it is sufficient merely to indicate the chief means by which the blood subserves this essential protective mechanism. Should living organisms find their way into the surface cells or within the tissue spaces, the body fights them in a number of ways, (1) It may produce one or more chemical substances capable of neutralizing the toxic material produced by the organism. (2) It may produce chemical substances which act as poisons to the micro-organism, either paralysing it or actually killing it. Or (3) the organism may be attacked and taken up into the body of wandering cells, e.g. certain of the leucocytes, and then digested by them. Such cells are therefore called phagocytes (φάγειν, to eat). Thus, by its power of reacting in these ways the body has become capable of withstanding the attacks of many different varieties of micro-organisms, of both animal and vegetable origin.
Therefore, we see that first and foremost, we need to consider blood as a carrier of nutrients to all the cells in the body. Secondly, it serves as a means to remove most, if not all, of the waste products. Thirdly, it transmits chemical substances produced in one tissue to distant cells where they may be essential for nutrition or stimulation. In addition to these important functions, there’s another crucial role that is nearly impossible to overstate, as it is vital for making the body immune to attacks from invading organisms. The topic of immunity is covered elsewhere, and it suffices to highlight the main ways in which blood supports this essential protective mechanism. If living organisms enter the surface cells or the spaces within the tissues, the body can respond in several ways: (1) It may produce one or more chemical substances that can neutralize the toxins created by the organism. (2) It might create chemical substances that act as poisons to the microorganism, either paralyzing it or killing it outright. Or (3) the organism may be attacked and engulfed by wandering cells, such as certain types of white blood cells, and then digested by them. Such cells are known as phagocytes (φάγειν, meaning to eat). Thus, through its ability to react in these ways, the body has developed the capacity to withstand attacks from many different types of microorganisms, both of animal and plant origin.
General Properties.—Blood is an opaque, viscid liquid of bright red colour possessing a distinct and characteristic odour, especially when warm. Its opacity is due to the presence of a very large number of solid particles, the blood corpuscles, having a higher refractive index than that of the liquid in which they float. The specific gravity in man averages about 1.055. The specific gravity of the liquid portion, the plasma (Gr. πλάσμα, something formed or moulded, πλάσσειν, to mould), is about 1.027, whilst that of the corpuscles amounts to 1.088. To litmus it reacts as a weak alkali.
General Properties.—Blood is a thick, cloudy liquid that is bright red and has a noticeable and distinct smell, especially when warm. Its cloudiness comes from a large number of solid particles, the blood cells, which have a higher refractive index than the liquid they are suspended in. The average specific gravity in humans is about 1.055. The specific gravity of the liquid part, the plasma (Gr. creature, something formed or shaped, πλάσσειν, to shape), is about 1.027, while the specific gravity of the blood cells is 1.088. It reacts to litmus as a weak alkali.
Blood Plasma.—The plasma is a solution in water of a varied number of substances, and as a solvent it confers on the blood its power of acting as a carrier of food stuffs and waste products. One important food substance, oxygen, is, however, only partly carried in solution, being mainly combined with haemoglobin in the red corpuscles. The food stuffs carried by the plasma are proteins, carbohydrates, salts and water. The main waste products dissolved in it are ammonium carbonate, urea, urates, xanthin bases, creatin and small amounts of other nitrogenous bodies, carbonic acid as carbonates, other carbon compounds such as cholesterin, lecithin and a number of other substances. Thus, if we take mammalian blood as a type, the plasma would have the following approximate composition:—
Blood Plasma.—Plasma is a solution in water containing various substances, and as a solvent, it gives blood its ability to transport nutrients and waste products. One key nutrient, oxygen, is only partially dissolved; it mainly binds with hemoglobin in red blood cells. The nutrients carried by plasma include proteins, carbohydrates, salts, and water. The primary waste products dissolved in it are ammonium carbonate, urea, urates, xanthine bases, creatine, and small amounts of other nitrogenous substances, along with carbonic acid as carbonates, and other carbon compounds like cholesterol, lecithin, and several other substances. Therefore, if we consider mammalian blood as a standard, the plasma would have the following approximate composition:—
In 1000 grms. plasma—
In 1000 grams of plasma—
Water | 901.51 | ||
Substances not vaporizing at 120° C.— | |||
Fibrin | 8.06 | ||
Other proteins and organic substances | 81.92 | ||
Inorganic substances— | |||
Chlorine | 3.536 | ||
Sulphuric acid | 0.129 | ||
Phosphoric acid | 0.145 | ||
Potassium | 0.314 | ||
Sodium | 3.410 | ||
Calcium | 0.298 | ||
Magnesium | 0.218 | ||
Oxygen | 0.455 | ||
—— | 8.505 | ||
—— | 98.49 | ||
——— | |||
1000.00 |
Proteins.—The proteins of the blood plasma belong to the two classes of the albumins and the globulins. The globulins present are named fibrinogen and serum-globulin; as its name implies, the chief physiological property of fibrinogen is that it can give rise to fibrin, the solid substance formed when blood clots. It possesses the typical properties of a globulin, i.e. it coagulates on heating (in this instance at a temperature of 56°C.), and is precipitated by half saturating its solution with ammonium sulphate. It differs from other globulins in that it is less soluble. It is only present in very small quantities, 0.4%. The other globulin, serum-globulin, is not coagulated until 75°C. is reached, and we now know that it is in reality a mixture of several proteins, but so far these have not been completely separated from one another and obtained in a pure form. On dialysing a solution of serum-globulin a part is precipitated, and this portion has been termed the eu-globulin fraction, the remainder being known, in contradistinction, as the pseudo-globulin. Again, on diluting a solution and adding a small amount of acetic acid a precipitate is formed which in some respects differs from the remainder of the globulin present. Whether in these two instances we are dealing with approximately pure substances is extremely doubtful. A further important point in connexion with the chemistry of the globulins is that dextrose may be found among their decomposition products, i.e. that a part of it, or possibly the whole, possesses a glucoside character.
Proteins.—The proteins in blood plasma fall into two categories: albumins and globulins. The globulins present include fibrinogen and serum-globulin. As its name suggests, fibrinogen's main physiological role is to convert into fibrin, the solid material formed during blood clotting. It has the typical characteristics of a globulin, i.e. it coagulates when heated (specifically at 56°C) and precipitates when half-saturated with ammonium sulfate. It differs from other globulins in that it is less soluble. It’s only found in very small amounts, 0.4%. In contrast, serum-globulin doesn’t coagulate until it reaches 75°C, and we now know it’s actually a mixture of several proteins, though these have yet to be fully separated and obtained in pure form. When dialyzing a serum-globulin solution, some elements precipitate, and this portion is referred to as the eu-globulin fraction, while the rest is called the pseudo-globulin. Additionally, when diluting a solution and adding a bit of acetic acid, a precipitate forms that differs in some ways from the other globulins present. It’s very questionable whether we are looking at nearly pure substances in these cases. Another important point regarding the chemistry of globulins is that dextrose may be found among their breakdown products, i.e. that part, or possibly all of it, might have a glucoside nature.
Serum-albumin gives all the typical colour and precipitation reactions of the albumins. If plasma be weakly acidified with sulphuric acid, then treated with crystals of ammonium sulphate until a slight precipitate forms, filtered and the filtrate allowed to evaporate very slowly, typical crystals of serum-albumin may form. According to many it is a uniform and specific 79 substance, but others hold the view that it consists of at least three distinct substances, as shown by the fact that if a solution be gradually heated coagulation will occur at three different temperatures, viz. at 73°, 77° and 84° C. On the other hand the close agreement between different analyses of even the amorphous preparations points to there being but one serum-albumin.
Serum albumin shows all the typical color and precipitation reactions of albumins. If plasma is lightly acidified with sulfuric acid and then treated with ammonium sulfate crystals until a slight precipitate forms, and then filtered, the filtrate can be allowed to evaporate very slowly to potentially form typical serum albumin crystals. Many believe it is a uniform and specific substance, but others argue that it consists of at least three distinct substances, as indicated by the fact that when a solution is gradually heated, coagulation occurs at three different temperatures: 73°, 77°, and 84° C. However, the close agreement between different analyses of even the amorphous preparations suggests that there is only one serum albumin.
When blood clots two new proteins make their appearance in the fluid part of the blood, or serum, as it is now called. The first of these is fibrin ferment (for its origin see section on Clotting below). The other, fibrinoglobulin, possesses all the typical characteristics of the globulins and coagulates at 64° C.
When blood clots, two new proteins appear in the liquid part of the blood, which is now called serum. The first of these is fibrin ferment (for its origin see section on Clotting below). The other, fibrinoglobulin, has all the typical traits of globulins and coagulates at 64° C.
Carbohydrates.—Three several carbohydrates are described as occurring in plasma, viz. glycogen, animal gum and dextrose. If glycogen is present in solution in the plasma it is there in very small quantities only, and has probably arisen from the destruction of the white blood corpuscles, since some leucocytes undoubtedly contain glycogen. A small amount of carbohydrate having the formula for starch and yielding a reducing sugar on hydrolysis with acid has also been described. The constant carbohydrate constituent of plasma, however, is dextrose. This is present to the approximate amount of 0.15% in arterial blood. The amount may be much greater in the blood of the portal vein during carbohydrate absorption, and according to some observers there is less in venous than in arterial blood, but the difference is small and falls within the error of observation. The statement that when no absorption is taking place the blood of the hepatic vein is richer in dextrose than that of the portal vein (Bernard) is denied by Pavy.
Carbohydrates.—Three types of carbohydrates are known to exist in plasma: glycogen, animal gum, and dextrose. If glycogen is found dissolved in the plasma, it's only in very small amounts and likely comes from the breakdown of white blood cells since some leukocytes definitely contain glycogen. There’s also a small amount of carbohydrate with a starch formula that produces a reducing sugar when hydrolyzed with acid. However, the main carbohydrate component in plasma is dextrose, which is approximately 0.15% in arterial blood. This amount can be significantly higher in the blood of the portal vein during carbohydrate absorption, and some researchers have noted that venous blood may have slightly less than arterial blood, but the difference is minimal and within the margin of error for observation. The claim that when no absorption is occurring, the blood in the hepatic vein contains more dextrose than that in the portal vein (Bernard) is contested by Pavy.
Fats.—Plasma or serum is as a rule quite clear, but after a meal rich in fats it may become quite milky owing to the presence of neutral fats in a very fine state of subdivision. This suspended fat rapidly disappears from the blood after fat absorption has ceased. To some extent it varies in composition with that of the fat absorbed, but usually consists of the glycerides of the common fatty acids—palmitic, stearic and oleic. In addition, there is a small amount of fatty acid in solution in the plasma. As to the form in which this occurs there is some uncertainty. It is possibly present as a soap or even as a neutral fat, since a little can be dissolved in plasma, the solvent substance being probably protein or cholesterin. Fatty acids also appear to be present to some extent combined with cholesterin forming cholesterin esters (about 0.06%).
Fats.—Plasma or serum is usually quite clear, but after a meal high in fats, it can become quite milky due to the presence of neutral fats that are very finely divided. This suspended fat quickly disappears from the blood once fat absorption stops. Its composition varies somewhat with the type of fat absorbed, but it typically consists of the glycerides of common fatty acids—palmitic, stearic, and oleic. Additionally, there is a small amount of fatty acid dissolved in the plasma. There is some uncertainty about how this occurs. It might be present as a soap or even as neutral fat, since a small amount can be dissolved in plasma, likely with proteins or cholesterol as the solvent. Fatty acids also seem to be partially combined with cholesterol, forming cholesterol esters (about 0.06%).
Other Organic Compounds.—In addition to the substances above described, belonging to the three main classes of food stuffs, there are still other organic bodies present in plasma in small amounts, which for convenience we may classify as non-nitrogenous and nitrogenous. Among the former may be mentioned lactic acid, glycerin, a lipochrome, and probably many other substances of a similar type whose separation has not yet been effected.
Other Organic Compounds.—Besides the substances mentioned above that belong to the three main classes of food, there are other organic compounds found in plasma in small amounts. For convenience, we can categorize these as non-nitrogenous and nitrogenous. Among the non-nitrogenous compounds are lactic acid, glycerin, a lipochrome, and likely many other similar substances that have not yet been isolated.
The non-protein nitrogenous constituents consist of the following: ammonia as carbonate or carbamate (0.2 to 0.6%), urea (0.02 to 0.05%), creatine, creatinine, uric acid, xanthine, hypoxanthine and occasionally hippuric acid. Three ferments are also described as being present: (1) a glycolytic ferment exerting an action upon dextrose; (2) a lipase or fat-splitting ferment; and (3) a diastase capable of converting starch into sugar.
The non-protein nitrogenous compounds include the following: ammonia as carbonate or carbamate (0.2 to 0.6%), urea (0.02 to 0.05%), creatine, creatinine, uric acid, xanthine, hypoxanthine, and sometimes hippuric acid. Three enzymes are also noted to be present: (1) a glycolytic enzyme that acts on dextrose; (2) a lipase, or fat-splitting enzyme; and (3) a diastase that can convert starch into sugar.
Salts.—The saline constituents of plasma comprise chlorides, phosphates, carbonates and possibly sulphates, of sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium. The most abundant metal is sodium and the most abundant acid is hydrochloric. These two are present in sufficient amount to form about 0.65% of sodium chloride. The phosphate is present to about 0.02%. Sulphuric acid is always present if the blood has been calcined for the purposes of the analysis, and may then be present to about 0.013%. This is, however, probably produced during the destruction of the protein, since it has been shown that no sulphate can be removed from normal plasma by dialysis. The amount of potassium present (0.03%) is less than one-tenth of that of the sodium, and the quantities of calcium and magnesium are even less.
Salts.—The saline components of plasma include chlorides, phosphates, carbonates, and possibly sulfates, from sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium. Sodium is the most common metal, and hydrochloric acid is the most common acid. Together, these make up about 0.65% of sodium chloride. Phosphate is present at about 0.02%. Sulfuric acid is always found if the blood has been burned for analysis and can be around 0.013%. However, this is likely produced during the breakdown of protein, as no sulfate can be removed from normal plasma by dialysis. The amount of potassium present (0.03%) is less than one-tenth of the sodium level, and the amounts of calcium and magnesium are even smaller.
Formed Elements.—When viewed under the microscope the main number of these are seen to be small yellow bodies of very uniform size, size and shape varying, however, in different animals. When observed in bulk they have a red colour, their presence in fact giving the typical colour to blood. These are the red blood corpuscles or erythrocytes (Gr. ἐρυθρός, red). Mingled with them in the blood are a smaller number of corpuscles which possess no colour and have therefore been called white blood corpuscles or leucocytes (Gr. λευκός, white). Lastly, there are present a large number of small lens-shaped structures, less in number than the red corpuscles, and much more difficult to distinguish. These are known as blood platelets.
Formed Elements.—Under the microscope, most of these appear as small yellow bodies that are very uniform in size, although their size and shape can differ between animals. When looking at them in bulk, they appear red, and their presence actually gives blood its typical color. These are the red blood cells or erythrocytes (Gr. red, red). Mixed in with them in the blood are fewer colorless cells, which are known as white blood cells or leukocytes (Gr. white, white). Finally, there are many small lens-shaped structures, fewer in number than the red cells and much harder to identify. These are called blood platelets.
Red Corpuscles.—These are present in very large numbers and, under normal conditions, all possess exactly the same appearance. With rare exceptions their shape is that of a biconcave disk with bevelled edges, the size varying somewhat in different animals, as is seen in the following table which gives their diameters:—
Red Blood Cells.—These are found in very high quantities and, under normal conditions, they all look exactly the same. With few exceptions, they have the shape of a biconcave disk with sloped edges, and their size varies slightly between different animals, as shown in the following table that provides their diameters:—
Man | 0.0075 mm. |
Dog | 0.0073 mm. |
Rabbit | 0.0069 mm. |
Cat | 0.0065 mm. |
Goat | 0.0041 mm. |
The coloured corpuscles of amphibia as well as of nearly all vertebrates below mammals are biconvex and elliptical. The following are the dimensions of some of the more common:—
The colored blood cells of amphibians and nearly all vertebrates below mammals are biconvex and elliptical. Here are the sizes of some of the more common ones:—
Pigeon | 0.0147 mm. long by 0.0065 mm. wide. |
Frog | 0.0223 ” ” 0.0157 ” ” |
Newt | 0.0293 ” ” 0.0195 ” ” |
Proteus | 0.0580 ” ” 0.0350 ” ” |
Amphiuma | 0.0770 ” ” 0.0460 ” ” |
Their number also varies as follows:—
Their number also varies as follows:—
Man | 4,000,000 | to 5,000,000 per cub. mm. |
Goat | 9,000,000 | to 10,000,000 ” ” |
Sheep | 13,000,000 | to 14,000,000 ” ” |
Birds | 1,000,000 | to 4,000,000 ” ” |
Fish | 250,000 | to 2,000,000 ” ” |
Frog | 500,000 | per cub. mm. |
Proteus | 36,000 | ” ” |
In mammals they are apparently homogeneous in structure, have no nucleus, but possess a thin envelope. Their specific gravity is distinctly higher than that of the plasma (1.088), so that if clotting has been prevented, blood on standing yields a large deposit which may form as much as half the total volume of the blood.
In mammals, they seem to be uniform in structure, lack a nucleus, and have a thin outer layer. Their specific gravity is noticeably higher than that of the plasma (1.088), so if clotting is prevented, blood will settle when left standing, leaving a significant deposit that can account for up to half the total blood volume.
Chemical Composition.—On destruction the red corpuscles yield two chief proteins, haemoglobin and a nucleo-protein, and a number of other substances similar to those usually obtained on the break-down of any cellular tissue, such for instance as lecithin, cholesterin and inorganic salts. The most important protein is the haemoglobin. To it the corpuscle owes its distinctive property of acting as an oxygen carrier, for it possesses the power of combining chemically with oxygen and of yielding up that same oxygen whenever there is a decrease in the concentration of the oxygen in the solvent. Thus in a given solution of haemoglobin the amount of it which is combined with oxygen depends absolutely on the oxygen concentration. The greatest dissociation of oxyhaemoglobin occurs as the oxygen tension falls from about 40 to 20 mm. of mercury. That the oxygen forms a definite compound with the haemoglobin is proved by the fact that haemoglobin thoroughly saturated with oxygen (oxyhaemoglobin) has a definite absorption spectrum showing two bands between the D and E lines, whilst haemoglobin from which the oxygen has been completely removed only gives one band between those lines. In association with this, oxyhaemoglobin has a typical bright red colour, whereas haemoglobin is dark purple. A further striking characteristic of haemoglobin is that it contains iron in its molecule. The amount present, though small bears a perfectly definite quantitative relation to the amount of oxygen with which the haemoglobin is capable of combining (two atoms of oxygen to one of iron). One gram of haemoglobin crystals can combine with 1.34 cc. of oxygen. On destruction with an acid or alkali, haemoglobin yields a pigment portion, haematin, and a protein portion, globin, the latter belonging to the group of the histones (Gr. ἱστός, web, tissue). 80 In this cleavage the iron is found in the pigment. By the use of a strong acid, it may be made to yield iron-free pigment, the remainder of the molecule being much further decomposed.
Chemical Composition.—When red blood cells break down, they release two main proteins: hemoglobin and a nucleoprotein, along with various other substances typically found in any kind of cellular tissue, such as lecithin, cholesterol, and inorganic salts. The most significant protein is hemoglobin. This is what gives red blood cells their unique ability to carry oxygen because it can chemically bond with oxygen and release it when the oxygen concentration in the surrounding fluid decreases. Therefore, in a specific solution of hemoglobin, the amount that binds with oxygen is entirely dependent on the oxygen concentration. The highest release of oxyhemoglobin occurs when the oxygen pressure drops from about 40 to 20 mm of mercury. The fact that oxygen forms a distinct compound with hemoglobin is shown by the absorption spectrum of fully oxygen-saturated hemoglobin (oxyhemoglobin), which displays two bands between the D and E lines, while hemoglobin that has lost all its oxygen shows only one band in that range. Additionally, oxyhemoglobin has a bright red color, while hemoglobin appears dark purple. A notable feature of hemoglobin is that it contains iron in its molecular structure. Although the amount of iron is small, it is in a specific quantitative relationship with the amount of oxygen that hemoglobin can bind (two oxygen atoms for one iron atom). One gram of hemoglobin crystals can combine with 1.34 cc of oxygen. When hemoglobin is broken down by an acid or alkali, it yields a pigment part called hematin and a protein part called globin, which belongs to the histone group (Gr. web, web, tissue). 80 In this breakdown, the iron is found in the pigment. Using a strong acid can separate the iron-free pigment, further decomposing the rest of the molecule.
Destruction and Formation.—In the performance of their work the corpuscles gradually deteriorate. They are then destroyed, chiefly in the liver, but whether the whole of this process is effected by the liver alone is not decided. It is proved, however, that the destruction of the haemoglobin is entirely effected there. It was for a long time considered to be one of the functions of the spleen to examine the red corpuscles and to destroy or in some way to mark those no longer fitted for the performance of their work. It is proved that the destruction of the haemoglobin is entirely effected in the liver, since both the main cleavage products may be traced to this organ, which discharges the pigmentary portion as the bile pigment, but retains the iron-protein moiety at any rate for a time. The amount of bile pigment eliminated during the day indicates that the destruction must be considerable, and since the number of corpuscles does not vary there must be an equivalent formation of new ones. This takes place in the red bone-marrow, where special cells are provided for their continuous production. In embryonic life their formation is effected in another way. Certain mesodermic cells, resembling those of the connective tissue, collect masses of haemoglobin, and from these elaborate red blood corpuscles which thus come to lie in the fluid part of the cell. By a canalization of the branches of these cells which unite with branches of other cells the precursors of the blood capillaries are formed.
Destruction and Formation.—As they do their job, the corpuscles gradually break down. They are primarily destroyed in the liver, though it's not confirmed that this process happens only there. It is established that the breakdown of hemoglobin takes place entirely in the liver. For a long time, it was thought that one of the spleen's functions was to examine red corpuscles and destroy or somehow mark those that were no longer fit for their role. However, it has been proven that the breakdown of hemoglobin occurs solely in the liver, as both main breakdown products can be traced back to this organ, which releases the pigment portion as bile pigment but keeps the iron-protein part for some time. The amount of bile pigment released during the day suggests that this breakdown must be significant, and since the number of corpuscles remains constant, there must be an equivalent production of new ones. This production occurs in the red bone marrow, where specific cells are tasked with their ongoing generation. During embryonic development, their formation happens differently. Certain mesodermal cells, which resemble connective tissue cells, gather large amounts of hemoglobin and then develop into red blood corpuscles that eventually reside in the fluid part of the cell. By the canalization of the branches of these cells that join with branches from other cells, the precursors of blood capillaries are formed.
White Blood Corpuscles.—These constitute the second important group of formed elements in the blood, and number about 12,000 to 20,000 per cubic mm. They are typical wandering cells carried to all parts of the body by the blood stream, but often leave that stream and gain the tissue spaces by passing through the capillary wall. They exist in many varieties and were first classified according as, under the microscope, they presented a granular appearance or appeared clear. The cells were also distinguished from one another according as they possessed fine or coarse granules. The granules are confined to the protoplasm of the cell, and it has been shown that they differ chemically, because their staining properties vary. Thus, some granules select an acid stain, and the cells containing them are then designated acidophile or eosinophile;1 other granules select a basic stain and are called basophile, while yet others prefer a neutral stain (neutrophile).
White Blood Cells.—These make up the second major group of formed elements in the blood and number about 12,000 to 20,000 per cubic mm. They are typical wandering cells carried to all parts of the body by the bloodstream, but they often leave that stream and enter the tissue spaces by passing through the capillary wall. They come in many varieties and were first classified based on whether they appeared granular or clear under the microscope. The cells were also distinguished from each other based on whether they had fine or coarse granules. The granules are found in the protoplasm of the cell, and it's been shown that they differ chemically because their staining properties vary. Some granules take on an acid stain, so the cells containing them are called acidophile or eosinophile;1 other granules take on a basic stain and are known as basophile, while others prefer a neutral stain (neutrophile).
In human blood the following varieties of leucocytes may be distinguished:—
In human blood, the following types of white blood cells can be identified:—
1. The Polymorphonuclear Cell.—This possesses a nucleus of very complicated outline and a fair amount of protoplasm filled with numbers of fine granules which stain with eosin. They vary in size but are usually about 0.01 mm. in diameter. They are highly amoeboid and phagocytic, and form about 70% of the total number of leucocytes.
1. The Polymorphonuclear Cell.—This cell has a nucleus with a very complex shape and contains a considerable amount of protoplasm filled with many fine granules that stain with eosin. The granules vary in size but are typically about 0.01 mm in diameter. These cells are highly amoeboid and phagocytic, making up about 70% of the total number of white blood cells.
2. The Coarsely Granular Eosinophile Cell.—These large cells contain a number of well-defined granules which stain deeply with acid dyes. The nucleus is crescentic. The cells amount to about 2% of the total number of leucocytes, though the proportion varies considerably. They are actively amoeboid.
2. The Coarsely Granular Eosinophile Cell.—These large cells have a number of clearly defined granules that stain strongly with acid dyes. The nucleus is crescent-shaped. These cells make up about 2% of the total number of white blood cells, although this proportion can vary significantly. They move actively in an amoeboid manner.
3. The Lymphocyte.—This is the smallest leucocyte, being only about 0.0065 mm. in diameter. It has a large spherical nucleus with a small rim of clear protoplasm surrounding it. It forms from 15 to 40% of the number of leucocytes, and is less markedly amoeboid than the other varieties.
3. The Lymphocyte.—This is the smallest white blood cell, measuring about 0.0065 mm in diameter. It has a large round nucleus with a thin edge of clear cytoplasm around it. It makes up about 15 to 40% of the total number of white blood cells and is less noticeably amoeboid than the other types.
4. The Hyaline (Gr. ὑάλινος, glassy, crystalline, ὔαλος, glass) cell or macrocyte (Gr. μακρός, long or large).—This is a cell similar to the last with a spherical, oval or indented nucleus, but it has much more protoplasm. It constitutes about 4% of all the leucocytes and is highly amoeboid and phagocytic.
4. The Hyaline (Gr. glass, glassy, crystalline, ὔαλος, glass) cell or macrocyte (Gr. long, long or large).—This cell is similar to the previous one but has a spherical, oval, or indented nucleus, and significantly more protoplasm. It makes up about 4% of all leukocytes and is highly amoeboid and phagocytic.
5. The Basophile Cell.—This possesses a spherical nucleus and the protoplasm contains a small number of granules staining deeply with basic dyes. It is rarely found in the blood of adults except in certain diseases.
5. The Basophile Cell.—This has a round nucleus, and the cytoplasm contains a small number of granules that stain darkly with basic dyes. It's rarely seen in the blood of adults, except in certain diseases.
Functions.—These cells act as scavengers or as destroyers of living organisms that may have gained access to the tissue spaces. They play an important part in the chemical processes underlying the phenomena of immunity, and some at least are of importance in starting the process of clotting.
Functions.—These cells serve as scavengers or as destroyers of living organisms that may have entered the tissue spaces. They play a crucial role in the chemical processes related to immunity, and at least some of them are important for initiating the clotting process.
They are constantly suffering destruction in the performance of their work. Many, too, are lost to the body by their passage through the different mucous surfaces. Their origin is still obscure in many points. The lymphocytes are derived from lymphoid tissue, wherever it exists in the different parts of the body. The polymorphonuclear and eosinophile cells are derived from the bone-marrow, each by division of specific mother cells located in that tissue. The macrocyte is believed by many to represent a further stage in the development of the lymphocyte. Their rate of formation may be influenced by a variety of conditions—for instance, they are found to vary in number according to the diet and also, to a considerable extent, in disease.
They continually face destruction while performing their work. Many are also lost through various mucous surfaces. Their origins remain unclear in several aspects. Lymphocytes come from lymphoid tissue found in different parts of the body. Polymorphonuclear and eosinophil cells originate from the bone marrow, each produced by the division of specific mother cells located in that tissue. Many believe that the macrocyte represents a further stage in the development of lymphocytes. Their production rate can be influenced by various conditions—for example, their numbers vary based on diet and significantly change in disease.
Platelets.—The platelets or thrombocytes (Gr. θρόμβος, clot) are the third class of formed elements occurring in mammalian blood. There are still, however, many observers who consider that platelets are not present in the normal circulating blood, but only make their appearance after it has been shed or otherwise injured. They are minute lens-shaped structures, and may amount to as many as 800,000 per cubic mm. Under certain conditions, examination has shown that they are protoplasmic and amoeboid, and that each one contains a central body of different staining properties from the remainder of the structure. This has been regarded by some as a nucleus. On being brought into contact with a foreign surface they adhere to it firmly, very rapidly passing through a number of phases resulting ultimately in the formation of granular debris. In shed blood they tend to collect into groups, and during clotting, fibrin filaments may be observed to shoot out from these clumps.
Platelets.—Platelets, or thrombocytes (Gr. thrombus, clot), are the third type of cell found in mammalian blood. However, many experts still believe that platelets aren't present in normal circulating blood, appearing only after the blood is spilled or otherwise damaged. They are tiny, lens-shaped structures, and their numbers can reach as high as 800,000 per cubic mm. Under certain conditions, studies have shown that they are protoplasmic and amoeboid, and each one has a central part that stains differently from the rest of the structure. Some have considered this a nucleus. When they come into contact with a foreign surface, they stick to it firmly and quickly go through several phases, eventually leading to the creation of granular debris. In spilled blood, they tend to gather in clusters, and during clotting, fibrin threads can be seen extending from these clumps.
Variations in the Blood of different Animals.—If we contrast the blood of different animals of the vertebrate class we find striking differences both in microscopic appearances and in chemical properties. In the first place, the corpuscles vary in amount and in kind. Thus, whilst in a mammal the corpuscles form 40 to 50% of the total volume of the blood, in the lower vertebrates the volume is much less, e.g. in frogs as low as 25% and in fishes even lower. The deficiency is chiefly in the red corpuscles, the ratio of white to red increasing as we examine the blood from animals lower in the scale. The corpuscles themselves are also found to vary, especially the red ones. In the mammal they are biconcave disks with bevelled edges, they do not contain a nucleus so that they are not cells. In the bird they are larger, ellipsoidal in shape and have a large nucleus in the centre of the cell. In reptiles and amphibia the red corpuscles are also nucleated, but the stroma portion containing the haemoglobin is arranged in a thickened annular part encircling the nucleus. When seen from the flat they are oval in section. In fishes the corpuscles show very much the same structure. A further very significant difference to be observed between the bloods of different vertebrates is in the amount of haemoglobin they contain; thus in the lower classes, fishes and amphibia, not only is the number of red corpuscles small but the amount of haemoglobin each corpuscle contains is relatively low. The concentration of the haemoglobin in the corpuscles attains its maximum in the mammal and the bird. Since the haemoglobin is practically the same from whatever animal it is obtained and can only combine with the same amount of oxygen, the oxygen-capacity of the blood of any vertebrate is in direct proportion to the amount of haemoglobin it contains. Therefore we see that as we ascend the scale in the vertebrate series the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood rises. This increase was a natural preliminary condition for the progress of evolution. In order that a more active animal might be developed the main essential was that the chemical processes of the cell should be carried out more rapidly, and as these processes are fundamentally oxidative, 81 increased activity entails an increased rate of supply of oxygen. This latter has been brought about in the animal kingdom in two ways, first by an increase in the concentration of the haemoglobin of the blood effected by an increase both in the number of corpuscles and in the amount of haemoglobin contained in each, and secondly by an increase in the rate at which the blood has been made to pass through the tissues. In the lower vertebrates the blood pressure is low and the haemoglobin content of the blood is low, consequently both rate of blood-flow and oxygen-content are low. In contrast with this, in higher vertebrates the blood pressure is high and the haemoglobin content of the blood is high, consequently both rate of blood-flow and oxygen-content are high. We must associate with this important step in evolution the means employed for the more rapid absorption of oxygen and for its increased rate of discharge to the tissues, the most important features of which are a diminution in the size of the corpuscle and the attainment of its peculiar shape, both resulting in the production of a relatively enormous corpuscular surface in a unit volume of blood.
Variations in the Blood of different Animals.—When we compare the blood of various vertebrate animals, we notice significant differences in both microscopic appearance and chemical properties. Firstly, the amount and type of blood cells vary. For example, in mammals, the cells make up 40 to 50% of the total blood volume, while in lower vertebrates, this volume is much less—like in frogs, it can be as low as 25%, and even lower in fish. The main shortfall is in the red blood cells, with the ratio of white cells to red cells increasing as we look at animals lower on the evolutionary scale. The shape of the blood cells also varies, especially the red ones. In mammals, they are biconcave disks with beveled edges and lack a nucleus, meaning they aren't true cells. In birds, these cells are larger, oval-shaped, and have a large nucleus at their center. In reptiles and amphibians, the red blood cells are also nucleated, but the part that contains hemoglobin is structured in a thick ring around the nucleus. When viewed flat, they have an oval shape. Fish blood cells exhibit a similar structure. Another significant difference among the blood of various vertebrates is the amount of hemoglobin present; in lower classes like fish and amphibians, not only are there fewer red blood cells, but each cell also contains a lower amount of hemoglobin. The concentration of hemoglobin peaks in mammals and birds. Since hemoglobin is nearly identical regardless of its animal source and can only bind a specific amount of oxygen, the oxygen-carrying capacity of any vertebrate's blood directly relates to its hemoglobin content. Thus, as we climb the evolutionary ladder of vertebrates, the oxygen-carrying capacity of their blood increases. This increase was a natural prerequisite for evolutionary advancement. To develop a more active animal, it was essential for cellular chemical processes to occur more rapidly, and since these processes are fundamentally oxidative, higher activity necessitates a higher oxygen supply. This enhancement in the animal kingdom occurred in two ways: first, by increasing hemoglobin concentration through a rise in both the number of blood cells and the hemoglobin within each cell, and second, by boosting the rate at which blood flows through tissues. In lower vertebrates, blood pressure and hemoglobin content are low, leading to lower rates of blood flow and oxygen content. In contrast, higher vertebrates have high blood pressure and high hemoglobin content, resulting in both higher blood flow rates and oxygen content. This important evolutionary advancement is linked to mechanisms for quicker oxygen absorption and increased delivery to the tissues, characterized by a reduction in cell size and the acquisition of a distinct shape, creating a relatively large surface area for blood cells in a unit volume of blood.
Variations are also found in the white corpuscles as well as in the red, but these differences are not so striking and lie chiefly in unimportant details of structure of individual cells. Enormous variations are to be found in different species of mammals, but the cells generally conform to the types of secreting cells or phagocytes.
Variations are also present in white blood cells as well as in red blood cells, but these differences are less noticeable and mostly relate to minor structural details of individual cells. There are significant variations among different species of mammals, but the cells generally fit into the categories of secretory cells or phagocytes.
The platelets also differ in the different species. In the frog, for instance, many are spindle-shaped and contain a nucleus-like structure. Birds’ blood is stated to contain no platelets. The variations in number of these bodies have not been satisfactorily ascertained on account of the difficulties involved in any attempt to preserve them and to render them visible under the microscope.
The platelets also vary among different species. For example, in frogs, many are spindle-shaped and have a nucleus-like structure. Birds’ blood is said to have no platelets. The differences in the number of these cells haven't been accurately determined due to the challenges in preserving them and making them visible under a microscope.
Differences are also found in the chemical composition of the plasma. The chief variation is in the amount of protein present, which attains its maximum concentration in birds and mammals, while in reptiles, amphibia and fishes it is much less. The bloods of the latter two classes are much more watery than that of the mammal. Moreover, it has been proved that there are specific differences in the chemical nature of the various proteins present even between different varieties of mammals. Thus the ratio of the globulin fraction to the albumin fraction may vary considerably, and again, one or other of the proteins may be quite specific for the animal from which it is derived.
Differences can also be seen in the chemical makeup of plasma. The main variation is in the amount of protein, which reaches its highest concentration in birds and mammals, while in reptiles, amphibians, and fish, it is much lower. The blood of these last two groups is much more watery compared to that of mammals. Furthermore, research has shown that there are specific differences in the chemical properties of the various proteins present, even among different types of mammals. For example, the ratio of globulin to albumin can vary significantly, and one type of protein may be specific to the particular animal it comes from.
Clotting.—If a sample of blood be withdrawn from an animal, within a short time it undergoes a series of changes and becomes converted into a stiff jelly. It is said to clot. If the process is watched it is seen to start first from the surfaces where it is in contact with any foreign body; thence it extends through the blood until the whole mass sets solid. A short time elapses before this process commences—a time dependent upon two chief conditions, viz. the temperature at which the blood is kept and the extent of foreign surface with which it is brought into contact. Thus in a mammal the blood clots most quickly at a temperature a little above body temperature, while if the blood be cooled quickly the clotting is considerably delayed and in the case of some animals altogether prevented. For example, human blood kept at body temperature clots in three minutes, while if allowed to cool to room temperature the first sign of clotting may not make its appearance until eight minutes after its removal from the body. The process of clotting is also considerably accelerated by making the blood flow in a thin stream over a wide surface. The full completion of the process occupies some time if the blood be kept quiet, but ultimately the whole mass of the blood becomes converted into a solid. At this stage the containing vessel may be inverted without any drop of fluid escaping. A short time after this stage has been reached drops of a yellow fluid appear upon the surface and, increasing in size and number, run together to form a layer of fluid separated from the clot. This fluid is termed serum; its appearance is due to the contraction of the clot, which thus squeezes out the fluid from between its solid constituents. Contraction continues for about twenty-four hours, at the end of which time a large quantity (one-third or more of the total volume) of serum may have been separated. The clot contracts uniformly, thus preserving throughout the same general shape as that of the vessel in which the blood has been collected. Finally the clot swims freely in the serum which it has expressed.
Clotting.—When a blood sample is taken from an animal, it quickly goes through a series of changes and turns into a stiff jelly. This is called clotting. If you observe the process, it starts at the surfaces where the blood comes into contact with any foreign object; from there, it spreads through the blood until the entire mass solidifies. There is a brief period before this process starts, depending on two main factors: the temperature of the blood and how much foreign surface it contacts. In mammals, blood clots fastest at a temperature slightly above body temperature, while if the blood cools quickly, clotting is significantly delayed, and in some animals, it can be completely stopped. For instance, human blood at body temperature clots in three minutes, but if it cools to room temperature, the first sign of clotting may not occur until eight minutes after being removed from the body. The clotting process is also sped up when blood flows in a thin stream over a wide surface. If the blood stays still, completing the process takes additional time, but eventually, the entire mass transforms into a solid. At this point, the container can be turned upside down without any fluid dripping out. Shortly after reaching this stage, drops of yellow fluid appear on the surface and, as they increase in size and number, they combine to form a layer of fluid separate from the clot. This fluid is called serum; its presence is due to the clot contracting and squeezing out the fluid from between its solid parts. Contraction continues for about twenty-four hours, during which time a significant amount (one-third or more of the total volume) of serum may be separated. The clot contracts evenly, maintaining the general shape of the vessel in which the blood was collected. Eventually, the clot floats freely in the serum it has released.
The cause of the clot formation has been found to be the precipitation of a solid from the liquid plasma of the blood. This solid is in the form of very minute threads and hence is termed fibrin. The threads traverse the mass of blood in every possible direction, interlacing and thus confining in their meshes all the solid elements of the blood. Soon after their deposition they begin to contract, and as the meshwork they form is very minute they carry with them all the corpuscles of the blood. These with the fibrin form the shrunken clot.
The reason blood clots form is because a solid precipitates out of the liquid plasma. This solid appears as tiny threads and is known as fibrin. These threads spread throughout the blood in all directions, weaving together and trapping all the solid components of the blood. Soon after they are formed, they start to contract, and since the mesh they create is very fine, they pull all the blood cells along with them. Together with the fibrin, these form the compact clot.
If the rate at which blood clots be retarded either by cooling or by some other process the corpuscles may have time to settle, partially or completely, in which case distinct layers may form. The lowermost of these contains chiefly the red corpuscles, the second layer may be grey owing to the high percentage of leucocytes present, while a third, marked by opalescence only, may be very rich in platelets. Above these a clear layer of fluid may be found. This is plasma. The formation of these layers depends solely upon the rate of sedimentation of these elements, the rate depending partly upon differences in specific gravity, and partly upon the tendency the corpuscles have to run into clumps. Horse’s blood offers one of the best instances of the clumping of red corpuscles, and in this animal sedimentation of the red corpuscles is most rapid.
If the rate at which blood clots is slowed down by cooling or some other method, the cells can settle partially or completely, leading to the formation of distinct layers. The bottom layer mostly contains red blood cells, the second layer may appear gray due to the high percentage of white blood cells present, while a third layer, which is only marked by its opalescence, can be very rich in platelets. Above these, you may find a clear layer of fluid. This is plasma. The formation of these layers depends entirely on how fast these components settle, which is influenced partly by differences in density and partly by the tendency of the cells to clump together. Horse blood provides one of the best examples of the clumping of red blood cells, and in horses, the sedimentation of red blood cells occurs most quickly.
If now such a sedimented blood is allowed to clot the process is found to start in the middle two layers, i.e. in those containing the white corpuscles and platelets. From these layers it spreads through the rest of the liquid, being most retarded, however, in the red corpuscle layer, and particularly so if the sedimentation has been very complete. Not only does the clotting process start from the layers containing the leucocytes and platelets, but in them it also proceeds more quickly. These observations clearly indicate that the clotting process is initiated by some change starting from these elements.
If sedimented blood is allowed to clot, the process begins in the middle two layers, meaning the ones with white blood cells and platelets. From these layers, it spreads throughout the rest of the liquid, but it moves the slowest in the layer with red blood cells, particularly if the sedimentation has been thorough. Not only does the clotting process start from the layers with white blood cells and platelets, but it also happens more quickly in those layers. These observations clearly show that the clotting process is initiated by some change starting from these elements.
The object of the clotting of the blood is quite clear. It is to prevent, as far as possible, any loss of blood when there is an injury to an animal’s vessels. The shed blood becomes converted into a solid, and this, extending into the interior of the ruptured vessel, forms a plug and thus arrests the bleeding. It is found that clotting is especially accelerated whenever the blood touches a foreign tissue, for instance, the outer layers of a torn blood-vessel wall, muscle tissue, &c., i.e. in exactly those conditions in which rapid clotting becomes of the greatest importance. Yet another very pregnant fact in connexion with clotting is that if an animal be bled rapidly and the blood collected in successive samples it is found that those collected last clot most quickly. Hence the more excessive the haemorrhage in any case, the greater becomes the onset of the natural cure for the bleeding, viz. clotting.
The purpose of blood clotting is clear. It's to minimize blood loss when an animal gets injured. The blood that spills out turns into a solid, which then fills the inside of the damaged blood vessel, creating a plug that stops the bleeding. Clotting happens much faster whenever blood comes into contact with foreign tissue, like the outer layers of a torn blood vessel or muscle tissue; basically, in situations where quick clotting is crucial. Another important point about clotting is that when an animal is bled quickly and blood is collected in intervals, the later samples clot faster. So, the more severe the bleeding is, the quicker the body initiates its natural process to stop it, which is clotting.
When we begin to inquire into the nature of clotting we have to determine in the first place whence the fibrin is derived. It has long been known that two chemical substances at least are requisite for its production. Thus certain fluids are known, e.g. some samples of hydrocele or pericardial fluid, which will not clot spontaneously, but will clot rapidly when a small quantity of serum or of an old blood-clot is added to it. The constituent substance which is present in the first-named fluids is known as fibrinogen, and that present in the serum or the clot is known as fibrin-ferment or thrombin.
When we start to look into how clotting works, we first need to figure out where fibrin comes from. It's been known for a while that at least two chemical substances are necessary for its creation. For example, there are certain fluids, like some types of hydrocele or pericardial fluid, that won't clot on their own but will clot quickly if you add a small amount of serum or an old blood clot. The substance found in the first fluids is called fibrinogen, while the one found in the serum or clot is known as fibrin-ferment or thrombin.
Fibrinogen is present in living blood dissolved in the plasma; it is also present in such fluids as hydrocele or pericardial effusions, which, though capable of clotting, do not clot spontaneously. Thrombin, on the other hand, does not exist in living blood, but only makes its appearance there after blood is shed. It is not yet certain what is the nature of the final reaction between fibrinogen and thrombin. The possibilities are, that thrombin may act—(1) by acting upon fibrinogen, which it in some way converts into fibrin, (2) by uniting with fibrinogen to form fibrin, or (3) by yielding part of itself to the fibrinogen which thus 82 becomes converted into fibrin. The experimental study of the rate of fibrin formation, when different strengths of thrombin solutions are allowed to act upon a fibrinogen solution, leads us to the probable conclusion that the first of these three possibilities is the correct one, and that thrombin therefore exerts a true ferment action upon fibrinogen. It is known that in the reaction, in addition to the formation of fibrin, yet another protein makes its appearance. This is known as fibrinoglobulin, and apparently it arises from the fibrinogen, so that the change would be one of cleavage into fibrin and fibrinoglobulin. It is very noteworthy that although the amount of fibrin formed during the clotting appears very bulky, yet the actual weight is extremely small, not more than 0.4 grms. from 100 cc. of blood.
Fibrinogen is found in living blood dissolved in plasma; it's also present in fluids like hydrocele or pericardial effusions, which can clot but do not spontaneously do so. Thrombin, however, isn't present in living blood and only emerges after blood is shed. It's still unclear what the final reaction between fibrinogen and thrombin is. The possibilities are that thrombin may act—(1) by converting fibrinogen into fibrin in some way, (2) by combining with fibrinogen to create fibrin, or (3) by donating part of itself to fibrinogen, which then transforms into fibrin. Experimental studies examining the rate of fibrin formation when different strengths of thrombin solutions interact with a fibrinogen solution suggest that the first option is the most likely, indicating that thrombin has a true enzymatic effect on fibrinogen. It's known that in addition to producing fibrin during the reaction, another protein called fibrinoglobulin also appears, which seems to come from fibrinogen, suggesting a cleavage into fibrin and fibrinoglobulin. It's worth noting that while the amount of fibrin formed during clotting looks substantial, its actual weight is very small, only about 0.4 grams from 100 cc of blood.
Having ascertained that the clotting is due to the action of thrombin upon fibrinogen, we now see that the next step to be explained is the origin of thrombin. It has been shown that the final step in its formation consists in the combination of another substance, termed prothrombin, with calcium. Any soluble calcium salt is found to be effective in this respect, and conversely the removal of soluble calcium (e.g. by sodium oxalate) will prevent the formation of thrombin and therefore of clotting.
Having confirmed that the clotting happens because of thrombin acting on fibrinogen, we now need to explain where thrombin comes from. It has been demonstrated that the final step in its formation involves the combination of another substance called prothrombin with calcium. Any soluble calcium salt can do this, and on the flip side, removing soluble calcium (for example, using sodium oxalate) will stop the production of thrombin and thus prevent clotting.
In the next place it can be proved that prothrombin does not exist as such in circulating blood, so that the problem becomes an inquiry as to the origin of prothrombin. Experiment has shown that in its turn prothrombin arises from yet another precursor, which is named thrombogen, and that thrombogen also is not to be found in circulating blood but only makes its appearance after the blood is shed. The conversion of thrombogen into prothrombin has been proved to be due to the action of a second ferment which has been named thrombokinase, and this latter is again absent from living blood. Hence the question arises, whence are derived thrombogen and thrombokinase? In the study of this question it has been found that if the blood of birds be collected direct from an artery through a perfectly clean cannula into a clean and dust-free glass vessel, it does not clot spontaneously. The plasma collected from such blood is found to contain thrombogen but no thrombokinase. A somewhat similar plasma may be prepared from a mammal’s blood by collecting samples of blood from an artery into vessels which have been thoroughly coated with paraffin, though in this instance thrombogen may be absent as well as thrombokinase. If plasma containing thrombogen but no thrombokinase be treated with a saline extract of any tissues it will soon clot. The saline extract contains thrombokinase. This ferment can therefore be derived from most tissues, including also the white blood corpuscles and the platelets. Thrombogen is produced from the leucocytes, but it is not yet certain whether it is also formed from the platelets. The discovery of the origin of the thrombokinase from tissue cells explains a fact that has long been known, namely, that if in collecting blood, it is allowed to flow over cut tissues, clotting is most markedly accelerated. The fact that birds’ blood if very carefully collected will not clot spontaneously tends to prove that thrombokinase is not derived from the leucocytes, and makes probable its origin from the platelets, for it is known that birds’ blood apparently does not contain platelets, at any rate in the form in which they are found in mammalian blood. When examining the general properties of platelets, attention was drawn to the remarkably rapid manner in which they undergo change on coming into contact with a foreign surface. It is apparently the actual contact which initiates these changes, changes which are fundamentally chemical in character, resulting in the production of thrombokinase and possibly also of thrombogen.
Next, it can be shown that prothrombin doesn’t exist in circulating blood, which leads us to investigate the source of prothrombin. Experiments have demonstrated that prothrombin comes from another precursor, known as thrombogen, and thrombogen isn’t found in circulating blood either; it only appears after blood is shed. The conversion of thrombogen into prothrombin has been proven to result from the action of a second enzyme called thrombokinase, which is also absent from living blood. This raises the question of where thrombogen and thrombokinase come from. Research shows that if bird blood is collected directly from an artery using a perfectly clean cannula into a clean, dust-free glass vessel, it won’t clot spontaneously. The plasma from this blood contains thrombogen but no thrombokinase. A similar plasma can be made from a mammal's blood by collecting samples directly from an artery into vessels that have been thoroughly coated with paraffin, though in this case, thrombogen may also be missing along with thrombokinase. If plasma containing thrombogen but no thrombokinase is treated with a saline extract from any tissues, it will clot quickly. The saline extract contains thrombokinase, which can be sourced from most tissues, including white blood cells and platelets. Thrombogen is produced from leukocytes, but it’s still uncertain if it’s also formed from the platelets. The discovery of the origin of thrombokinase from tissue cells explains a well-known fact: that if blood is allowed to flow over cut tissues during collection, clotting is significantly accelerated. The fact that bird blood, when collected very carefully, does not clot spontaneously suggests that thrombokinase isn’t derived from leukocytes and likely comes from the platelets, as it’s known that bird blood apparently doesn’t contain platelets in the same way mammalian blood does. Upon examining the general properties of platelets, it was noted how rapidly they change when they come into contact with a foreign surface. This contact seems to trigger these fundamentally chemical changes, resulting in the production of thrombokinase and possibly also thrombogen.
Thus as our knowledge at present stands the following statement gives a recapitulated account of the changes which constitute the many phases of clotting. When blood escapes from a blood-vessel it comes into contact with a foreign surface, either a tissue or the damaged walls of the cut vessel. Very speedily this contact results in the discharge of thrombogen and thrombokinase, the former from the white blood corpuscles and also possibly from the platelets, the latter from the platelets or from the tissue with which the blood comes in contact. The interaction of these two bodies next results in the formation of prothrombin, which, combining with the calcium of any soluble lime salt present, forms thrombin or fibrin-ferment. The last step in the change is the action of thrombin upon fibrinogen to form fibrin, and the clot is complete.
So, based on what we know right now, the following statement provides a summary of the changes that make up the different stages of clotting. When blood leaks out of a blood vessel, it comes into contact with a foreign surface, like tissue or the damaged walls of the cut vessel. This contact quickly leads to the release of thrombogen and thrombokinase, with thrombogen coming from white blood cells and possibly from platelets, and thrombokinase coming from platelets or the tissue the blood touches. The interaction between these two substances then results in the creation of prothrombin, which, when combined with any soluble calcium present, forms thrombin or fibrin-ferment. The final step in this process is the action of thrombin on fibrinogen to produce fibrin, completing the clot.
The intrinsic value to the animal of these changes is quite plain. The power of clotting and thus stopping haemorrhage is of essential importance, and yet this clotting must not occur within the living blood-vessels, or it would speedily result in death. That the tissues should be able to accelerate the process is of very obvious value. That the inner lining of the blood-vessels does not act as a foreign tissue is possibly due to the extreme smoothness of their surface.
The inherent value of these changes to the animal is clear. The ability to clot and stop bleeding is crucial, but this clotting can't happen inside the living blood vessels, or it would quickly lead to death. It's clearly beneficial for the tissues to be able to speed up this process. The fact that the inner lining of the blood vessels doesn't react like foreign tissue may be because of its extremely smooth surface.
Further, an animal must always be exposed to a possible danger in the absorption of some thrombin from a mass of clotted blood still retained within the body, and we know that if a quantity of active ferment be injected into the blood-stream intravascular clotting does result. Under all usual conditions this is obviated, the protective mechanism being of a twofold character. First, it is found that thrombin becomes converted very quickly into an inactive modification. Serum, for instance, very quickly loses its power of inducing clotting in fibrinogen solutions. Secondly, the body has been found to possess the power of making a substance, antithrombin, which can combine with thrombin forming a substance which is quite inactive as far as clotting is concerned. Finally, there is evidence that normal blood contains a small quantity of this substance, antithrombin, and that under certain conditions the amount present may be enormously increased.
Additionally, an animal is always at risk of absorbing some thrombin from a mass of clotted blood still in the body, and we know that injecting a certain amount of active enzyme into the bloodstream can lead to intravascular clotting. Usually, this risk is avoided by a two-fold protective mechanism. First, thrombin quickly converts into an inactive form. For example, serum rapidly loses its ability to cause clotting in fibrinogen solutions. Second, the body produces a substance called antithrombin, which can bind with thrombin to create a compound that doesn’t promote clotting. Lastly, there’s evidence that normal blood contains a small amount of antithrombin, and that under specific conditions, the levels can significantly increase.
Pathology of the Blood.
Blood Disorders.
The changes in the blood in disease are probably as numerous and varied as the diseases which attack the body, for the blood is not only the medium of respiration, but also of nutrition, of defence against organisms and of many other functions, none of which can be affected without corresponding alterations occurring in the circulating fluid. The immense majority of these changes are, however, so subtle that they escape detection by our present methods. But in certain directions, notably in regard to the relations with micro-organisms, changes in the blood-plasma can be made out, though they are not associated in all cases with changes in the formed elements which float in it, nor with any obvious microscopical or chemical alterations.
The changes in the blood during
The phenomena of immunity to the attacks of bacteria or their toxins, of agglutinative action, of opsonic action, of the precipitin tests, and of haemolysis, are all largely dependent on the inherent or acquired characters Immunity. of the blood serum. It is a commonplace that different people vary in their susceptibility to the attacks of different organisms, and different species of animals also vary greatly. This “natural immunity” is due partly to the power possessed by the leucocytes or white blood corpuscles of taking into their bodies and digesting or holding in an inert state organisms which reach the blood—phagocytosis,—partly to certain bodies in the blood serum which have a bactericidal action, or whose presence enables the phagocytes to deal more easily with the organisms. This natural immunity can be heightened when it exists, or an artificial immunity can be produced in various ways. Doses of organisms or their toxins can be injected on one or several occasions, and provided that the lethal dose be not reached, in most cases an increased power of resistance is produced. The organisms may be injected alive in a virulent condition, or with their virulence lessened by heat or cold, by antiseptics, by cultivation in the presence of oxygen, or by passage through other animals, or they may first be killed, or their toxins alone injected. The method chosen in each case depends on the organism dealt with. The result of this treatment is that in the animal treated protective substances appear in the serum, and these substances can be transferred to the serum of another animal or of man; in other words the active immunity of the experimental animal can be translated into 83 the passive immunity of man. According to the nature of the substances injected into the former, its serum may be antitoxic, if it has been immunized against any particular toxin, or antibacterial, if against an organism. Familiar examples of these are, of the former diphtheria antitoxin, of the latter anti-plague and anti-typhoid sera. An antitoxin exerts its effects by actual combination with the respective toxin, the combination being inert. It is probable that the ultimate source of the antitoxin is to be found in the living cells of the tissues and that it passes from them into the blood. The action of an antibacterial serum depends on the presence in it of a substance known as “immune-body,” which has a special affinity and power of combining with the bacterium used. In order that it may exert this power it requires the presence of a substance normally present in the serum known as “complement.” The development of these “anti-bodies,” though it has been studied mainly in connexion with bacteria and their toxins, is not confined to their action, but can be demonstrated in regard to many other substances, such as ferments, tissue cells, red corpuscles, &c. In some animals, for example, the blood serum has the power of dissolving the red corpuscles of an animal of different species; e.g. the guinea-pig’s serum is “haemolytic” to the red corpuscles of the ox. This haemolytic power (haemolysis) can be increased by repeated injections of red corpuscles from the other animal, in this case also, as in the bacterial case, by the production and action of immune-body and complement. The antiserum produced in the case of the red corpuscles may sometimes, if injected into the first animal, whose red corpuscles were used, cause extensive destruction of its red corpuscles, with haemoglobinuria, and sometimes a fatal result.
The ability to resist attacks from bacteria or their toxins, along with the actions of agglutination, opsonization, precipitin tests, and hemolysis, all rely significantly on the innate or acquired characteristics of blood serum. It's well-known that different individuals have varying levels of susceptibility to different organisms, and this variance is also seen across different animal species. This “natural immunity” partially stems from the ability of leukocytes, or white blood cells, to ingest and digest or neutralize invading organisms — a process known as phagocytosis. It also involves specific components in the blood serum that have bactericidal properties or enhance the efficiency of phagocytes in targeting these organisms. Natural immunity can be boosted when it already exists, or artificial immunity can be created in multiple ways. For instance, organisms or their toxins can be injected once or multiple times, as long as the lethal dose isn’t reached, which usually results in enhanced resistance. These organisms might be injected while still alive in their virulent form or with reduced virulence through methods like heating, cooling, using antiseptics, cultivating in oxygen, or passing through other animals. Alternatively, they might be killed prior to injection, or just their toxins might be introduced. The method chosen depends on the specific organism involved. The outcome of this treatment is that protective substances will appear in the treated animal's serum, which can then be transferred to another animal or a human. In other words, the active immunity exhibited by the test animal can become passive immunity for humans. Depending on what substances are injected, the serum may become antitoxic if immunized against a specific toxin, or antibacterial if targeting a particular organism. Notable examples include diphtheria antitoxin for the former and anti-plague or anti-typhoid sera for the latter. An antitoxin works by directly combining with its corresponding toxin, creating an inert complex. It’s likely that the antitoxin originates from the living cells of the tissues and moves into the bloodstream. The function of an antibacterial serum relies on a component called “immune-body,” which has a strong affinity for and can bind with the bacterium in question. For the immune-body to work effectively, it requires a substance normally found in the serum known as “complement.” The development of these “antibodies” has mainly been studied in relation to bacteria and their toxins, but it is not limited to these contexts; it can also be shown in relation to many other substances, including enzymes, tissue cells, red blood cells, etc. In some animals, like guinea pigs, the blood serum can dissolve the red blood cells of different species; for example, guinea pig serum is “hemolytic” to cow red blood cells. This hemolytic ability (hemolysis) can be amplified through repeated injections of red blood cells from the other animal. Similarly, in the case of bacteria, this involves the production and function of immune-body and complement. The antiserum created from the red blood cells may sometimes, when injected back into the original animal (the source of the red blood cells), cause significant destruction of its own red blood cells, leading to hemoglobinuria and potentially fatal outcomes.
Opsonic action depends on the presence of a substance, the “opsonin,” in the serum of an immunized animal, which makes the organism in question more easily taken up by the phagocytes (leucocytes) of the blood. The opsonin becomes fixed to the organisms. It is present to a certain extent in normal serum, but can be greatly increased by the process of immunization; and the “opsonic index,” or relation between the number of organisms taken up by leucocytes when treated with the serum of a healthy person or “control,” and with the serum of a person affected with any bacterial disease and under treatment by immunization, is regarded by some as representing the degree of immunity produced.
Opsonic action relies on a substance called “opsonin” found in the serum of an immunized animal, which helps phagocytes (white blood cells) in the bloodstream more easily take up the targeted organisms. The opsonin attaches to the organisms. It's present in normal serum to some degree but can be significantly increased through immunization. The “opsonic index,” which compares the number of organisms that white blood cells absorb when exposed to the serum of a healthy person (the “control”) versus the serum of someone with a bacterial infection undergoing immunization treatment, is considered by some to indicate the level of immunity achieved.
Agglutinative action is evidence of the presence in a serum of a somewhat similar set of substances, known as “agglutinins.” When a portion of an antiserum is added to an emulsion of the corresponding organism, the organisms, if they are motile, cease to move, and in any case become gathered together into clumps. In all probability several different bodies are concerned in this process. This reaction, in its practical applications at least, may be regarded as a reaction of infection rather than of immunization as ordinarily understood, for it is found that the blood serum of patients suffering from typhoid, Malta fever, cholera, and many other bacterial diseases, agglutinates the corresponding organisms. This fact has come to be of great importance in diagnosis.
Agglutinative action shows that there are similar substances in a serum, called “agglutinins.” When a part of an antiserum is mixed with an emulsion of the matching organism, the organisms, if they can move, stop moving and clump together. It’s likely that several different factors are involved in this process. This reaction is considered more of a sign of infection rather than immunization in the usual sense, since the blood serum of patients with typhoid, Malta fever, cholera, and many other bacterial infections can agglutinate the corresponding organisms. This fact has become very important for diagnosis.
The precipitin test depends on a somewhat analogous reaction. If the serum of an animal be injected repeatedly into another animal of different species, a “precipitin” appears in the serum of the animal treated, which causes a precipitate when added to the serum of the first animal. The special importance of this fact is that it can be utilized as a method of distinguishing between human blood and that of animals, which is often of importance in medical jurisprudence.
The precipitin test involves a similar reaction. If you inject the serum from one animal into another animal of a different species multiple times, the treated animal’s serum will develop a “precipitin” that creates a precipitate when mixed with the first animal’s serum. This is particularly important because it can be used to tell the difference between human blood and animal blood, which is often crucial in legal medicine.
In this summary the facts adduced are practically all biological, and are due to the extraordinary activity with which the study of bacteriology (q.v.) has been pursued in recent years. The chemistry of the blood has not hitherto been found to give information of clinical or diagnostic importance, and nothing need here be added to what is said above on the physiology of the blood. Enough has been said, however, to show the extraordinary complexity of the apparently simple blood serum.
In this summary, the facts presented are mostly biological and result from the remarkable efforts dedicated to the study of bacteriology (q.v.) in recent years. The chemistry of the blood hasn’t yet provided information that is clinically or diagnostically significant, and there’s no need to add anything further to what has been mentioned above regarding the physiology of the blood. However, enough has been discussed to highlight the incredible complexity of the seemingly simple blood serum.
The methods at present employed in examining the blood clinically are: the enumeration of the red and white corpuscles per cubic millimetre; the estimation of the percentage of haemoglobin and of the specific gravity of the blood; the microscopic examination of freshly-drawn blood and of blood films made upon cover-glasses, fixed and stained. In special cases the alkalinity and the rapidity of coagulation may be ascertained, or the blood may be examined bacteriologically. We have no universally accepted means of estimating, during life, the total amount of blood in the body, though the method of J.S. Haldane and J. Lorrain Smith, in which the total oxygen capacity of the blood is estimated, and its total volume worked out from that datum, has seemed to promise important results (Journ. of Physiol. vol. xxv. p. 331, 1900). After death the amount of blood sometimes seems to be increased, and sometimes, as in “pernicious anaemia,” it is certainly diminished. But the high counts of red corpuscles which are occasionally reported as evidence of plethora or increase of the total blood are really only indications of concentration of the fluid except in certain rare cases. It is necessary, therefore, in examining blood diseases, to confine ourselves to the study of the blood-unit, which is always taken as the cubic millimetre, without reference to the number of units in the body.
The current methods used for clinically examining blood are: counting the red and white blood cells per cubic millimeter; measuring the percentage of hemoglobin and the blood's specific gravity; and performing microscopic examinations of freshly drawn blood and blood films on cover glasses that are fixed and stained. In special cases, we might check the alkalinity and speed of coagulation, or analyze the blood for bacteria. We don’t have a universally accepted way to measure the total amount of blood in the body while a person is alive, though the method developed by J.S. Haldane and J. Lorrain Smith, which estimates the total oxygen capacity of the blood and calculates its total volume from that, has shown promise for important results (Journ. of Physiol. vol. xxv. p. 331, 1900). After death, the amount of blood sometimes appears increased, while in cases like "pernicious anemia," it is definitely decreased. However, high counts of red blood cells that are occasionally reported as proof of excess blood are actually just signs of fluid concentration, except in some rare situations. Therefore, when studying blood diseases, it’s important to focus on the blood unit, which is always measured in cubic millimeters, without considering the total number of units in the body.
Anaemia is often used as a generic term for all blood diseases, for in almost all of them the haemoglobin is diminished, either as a result of diminution in the number of the red corpuscles in which it is contained, or because the Anaemia. individual red corpuscles contain a smaller amount of haemoglobin than the normal. As haemoglobin is the medium of respiratory interchange, its diminution causes obvious symptoms, which are much more easily appreciated by the patient than those caused by alterations in the plasma or the leucocytes. It is customary to divide anaemias into “primary” and “secondary”: the primary are those for which no adequate cause has as yet been discovered; the secondary, those whose cause is known. Among the former are usually included chlorosis, pernicious anaemia, and sometimes the leucocythaemias; among the latter, the anaemias due to such agencies as malignant disease, malaria, chronic metallic poisoning, chronic haemorrhage, tubercle, Bright’s disease, infective processes, intestinal parasites, &c. As our knowledge advances, however, this distinction will probably be given up, for the causes of several of the primary anaemias have been discovered. For example, the anaemia due to bothriocephalus, an intestinal parasite, is clinically indistinguishable from the other forms of pernicious anaemia with which it used to be included, and leucocythaemia has been declared by Löwit, though probably erroneously, to be due to a blood parasite closely related to that of malaria. In all these conditions there is a considerable similarity in the symptoms produced and in the pathological anatomy. The general symptoms are pallor of the skin and mucous membranes, weakness and lassitude, shortness of breath, palpitation, a tendency to fainting, and usually also gastro-intestinal disturbance, headache and neuralgia. The heart is often dilated, and on auscultation the systolic murmurs associated with that condition are heard. In fatal cases the internal organs are found to be pale, and very often their cells contain an excessive amount of fat. In many anaemias there is a special tendency to haemorrhage. Most of the above symptoms and organic changes are directly due to diminished respiratory interchange from the loss of haemoglobin, and to its effect on the various organs involved. The diagnosis depends ultimately in all cases upon the examination of the blood.
Anaemia is often used as a general term for all blood disorders, as in almost all of them, the hemoglobin level is reduced, either due to a decrease in the number of red blood cells that contain it or because individual red blood cells have less hemoglobin than normal. Since hemoglobin is essential for oxygen exchange, lower levels lead to noticeable symptoms that patients can easily recognize, unlike those caused by changes in plasma or white blood cells. Anemia is typically categorized into “primary” and “secondary”: primary anemias have no clear cause yet identified, while secondary anemias have known causes. Primary anemias typically include chlorosis, pernicious anemia, and sometimes leukemias; secondary anemias are caused by factors like malignant diseases, malaria, chronic metal poisoning, prolonged bleeding, tuberculosis, kidney disease, infectious processes, intestinal parasites, etc. However, as our understanding evolves, this distinction may fade, since the causes of several primary anemias have been identified. For instance, anemia caused by bothriocephalus, an intestinal parasite, is clinically indistinguishable from other forms of pernicious anemia it used to be grouped with, and leukemias have been attributed by Löwit, though likely incorrectly, to a blood parasite closely related to that of malaria. In all these conditions, the symptoms and pathological features are quite similar. General symptoms include pale skin and mucous membranes, weakness and fatigue, shortness of breath, rapid heartbeat, a tendency to faint, and often gastrointestinal issues, headaches, and nerve pain. The heart is often enlarged, and when listening with a stethoscope, systolic murmurs associated with that condition can be heard. In severe cases, internal organs appear pale, and their cells often contain excessive fat. Many anemias also have a particular tendency to bleed. Most of the symptoms and bodily changes mentioned are directly related to reduced oxygen exchange due to the loss of hemoglobin and its impact on the various affected organs. Ultimately, the diagnosis in all cases relies on analyzing the blood.
Though the relative proportions of the leucocytes are probably continually undergoing change even in health, especially as the result of taking food, the number of red corpuscles remains much more constant. Through the agency of some unknown mechanism, the supply of fresh red corpuscles from the bone-marrow keeps pace with the destruction of effete corpuscles, and in health each corpuscle contains a definite and constant amount of haemoglobin. The disturbance of this arrangement in anaemia may be due to loss or to increased destruction of corpuscles, to the supply of a smaller number of new ones, to a 84 diminution of the amount of haemoglobin in the individual new corpuscles, or to a combination of these causes. It is most easy to illustrate this by describing what happens after a haemorrhage. If this is small, the loss is replaced by the fully-formed corpuscles held in reserve in the marrow, and there is no disturbance. If it is larger, the amount of fluid lost is first made up by fluid drawn from the tissues, so that the number of corpuscles is apparently diminished by dilution of the blood; the erythroblasts, or formative red corpuscles, of the bone-marrow are stimulated to proliferation, and new corpuscles are quickly thrown into the circulation. These are apt, however, to be small and to contain a subnormal amount of haemoglobin, and it is only after some time that they are destroyed and their place taken by normal corpuscles. If the loss has been very great, nucleated red corpuscles may even be carried into the blood-stream. The blood possesses a great power of recovery, if time be given it, because the organ (bone-marrow) which forms so many of its elements never, in health, works at high pressure. Only a part of the marrow, the so-called red marrow, is normally occupied by erythroblastic tissue, the rest of the medullary cavity of the bones being taken up by fat. If any long-continued demand for red corpuscles is made, the fat is absorbed, and its place gradually taken by red marrow. This compensatory change is found in all chronic anaemias, no matter what their cause may be, except in some rare cases in which the marrow does not react.
Although the proportions of leucocytes are likely always changing, even in a healthy state and especially after eating, the number of red blood cells tends to stay much more stable. An unknown mechanism ensures that the production of new red blood cells from the bone marrow keeps up with the breakdown of old cells, and in a healthy individual, each blood cell contains a specific and consistent amount of hemoglobin. Disruption of this balance in anemia might be due to a loss of blood cells, an increased rate of cell destruction, a lower production of new cells, a decrease in the hemoglobin content of the newly formed cells, or a combination of these factors. This can be clearly illustrated by what occurs after bleeding. If the bleeding is minor, the loss can be compensated by the fully-formed reserve blood cells stored in the marrow, and everything remains normal. However, if the bleeding is more significant, the lost fluid is initially replaced by fluid drawn from the tissues, which causes a temporary dilution of the blood that seems to lower the number of blood cells; the erythroblasts, or young red blood cells, in the bone marrow are stimulated to multiply, and new cells are rapidly released into circulation. These new cells, though, tend to be smaller and contain less hemoglobin than normal, and it takes time for them to be replaced by fully mature cells. In cases of severe bleeding, even nucleated red blood cells may enter the bloodstream. Blood has a remarkable ability to recover, assuming it has enough time to do so, as the organ (bone marrow) that creates so many of its components typically does not operate at full capacity. Only a portion of the bone marrow, known as red marrow, is normally filled with blood-forming tissue, while the remainder of the medullary cavity houses fat. When there's a prolonged need for red blood cells, the fat gets absorbed and gradually replaced by red marrow. This compensatory adjustment occurs in all chronic anemias, regardless of their underlying cause, except in some rare situations where the marrow does not respond.
It is often very difficult, especially in “secondary” anaemias, to say which of the above processes is mainly at work. In acute anaemias, such as those associated with septicaemia, there is no doubt that blood destruction plays the principal part. But if the cause of anaemia is a chronic one, a gastric cancer, for instance, though there may possibly be an increased amount of destruction of corpuscles in some cases, and though there is often loss by haemorrhage, the cancer interferes with nutrition, the blood is impoverished and does not nourish the erythroblasts in the marrow sufficiently, and the new corpuscles which are turned out are few and poor in haemoglobin. In chronic anaemias, regeneration always goes on side by side with destruction, and it is important to remember that the state of the blood in these conditions gives the measure, not of the amount of destruction which is taking place so much as of the amount of regeneration of which the organism is capable. The evidence of destruction has often to be sought for in other organs, or in secretions or excretions.
It’s often really challenging, especially in “secondary” anemias, to identify which of the processes mentioned above is primarily happening. In acute anemias, like those linked to septicemia, it’s clear that blood destruction is the main factor. However, if the cause of anemia is something chronic, like gastric cancer, there might be an increased destruction of blood cells in some cases, and there’s often blood loss, but the cancer disrupts nutrition. As a result, the blood becomes poor and doesn’t supply enough nourishment to the erythroblasts in the marrow, so the new blood cells produced are few and low in hemoglobin. In chronic anemias, regeneration continuously occurs alongside destruction, and it’s crucial to remember that the condition of the blood in these cases reflects not just the level of destruction occurring but also the capacity for regeneration the body has. Evidence of destruction often has to be sought in other organs or in secretions or excretions.
Of the so-called primary anaemias the most common is chlorosis, an anaemia which occurs only in the female sex, between the ages of fifteen and twenty-five as a rule. Its symptoms are those caused by a diminution of haemoglobin, and though it is never directly fatal, and is extremely amenable to treatment with iron preparations, its subjects very frequently suffer from relapses at varying intervals after the first attack. Its causation is probably complex. Bad hygienic conditions, over-fatigue, want of proper food, especially of the iron-containing proteids of meat, the strain put upon the blood and blood-forming organs by the accession of puberty and the occurrence of menstruation, all probably play a part in it. It has also been suggested that internal secretions may be concerned in stimulating the bone-marrow, and that in the female sex in particular the genital organs may act in this way. Imperfect assumption of function by these organs at puberty, caused perhaps by some of the above-mentioned conditions, might lead to sluggishness in the bone-marrow, and to the supply to the blood of the poorly-formed corpuscles deficient in haemoglobin which are characteristic of the disease. Chlorosis is the type of anaemias from imperfect blood-formation. Lorrain Smith has produced evidence to show that the total amount of haemoglobin in the body is not diminished in this disease, but that the blood-plasma is greatly increased in amount, so that the haemoglobin is diluted and the amount in each blood-unit greatly lessened.
Of the so-called primary anemias, the most common is chlorosis, an anemia that typically occurs in females between the ages of fifteen and twenty-five. Its symptoms result from a decrease in hemoglobin. While it is never directly fatal and responds well to treatment with iron supplements, those affected often experience relapses at different intervals after the initial episode. The causes are likely complex, involving poor hygienic conditions, excessive fatigue, lack of proper nutrition—especially iron-rich protein from meat—and the stress on the blood and blood-forming organs due to puberty and menstruation. It's also been suggested that internal secretions may play a role in stimulating the bone marrow, and in females, the reproductive organs might influence this process. If these organs function imperfectly at puberty, possibly due to some of the aforementioned factors, it could lead to sluggishness in the bone marrow and a supply of poorly formed blood cells lacking hemoglobin, which are typical of this condition. Chlorosis represents a type of anemia associated with inadequate blood formation. Lorrain Smith has provided evidence indicating that the total amount of hemoglobin in the body is not reduced in this disease; rather, the blood plasma is significantly increased, which dilutes the hemoglobin and reduces its concentration in each blood unit.
Pernicious anaemia is a rarer disease than chlorosis, occurs usually later in life, and is distributed nearly equally between the two sexes. But it is of great importance because of its almost uniformly fatal termination, though its downward course is generally broken by temporary improvement on one or more occasions. The symptoms are those of a progressive anaemia, in which gastro-intestinal disturbance usually plays a large part, and nervous symptoms are common, and they become at last much more severe than those of any secondary anaemia. The patient may die in the first attack, but more usually, when things seem to be at their worst, improvement sets in, either spontaneously or as the result of treatment, and the patient slowly regains apparent health. This remission may be followed by a relapse, that again by a remission, and so on, but as a rule the disease is fatal within, at the outside, two or three years.
Pernicious anemia is a less common disease than chlorosis, usually occurs later in life, and affects both genders almost equally. However, it is very significant due to its consistently fatal outcome, although its progression is often interrupted by temporary improvements on one or more occasions. The symptoms are those of progressive anemia, with gastrointestinal issues typically playing a major role, and nervous symptoms are frequent, becoming much more severe than those of any secondary anemia. A patient may die during the first episode, but more often, when things seem to be at their worst, improvement occurs, either on its own or through treatment, and the patient gradually regains apparent health. This improvement may be followed by a relapse, which can then be followed by another improvement, and so on, but generally, the disease is fatal within, at the latest, two to three years.
The prime cause of the disease is not known. It seems probable indeed that the causal factors are numerous. Severe malarial infection, syphilis, pregnancy, chronic gastro-intestinal disease, chronic gas-poisoning, are all, in different cases, known to have been causally associated with it, and it is probable that a congenital weakness of the bone-marrow has often to do with its production, as in many cases a family or hereditary history of the disease can be obtained. The condition is now regarded as a chronic toxaemia, partly because of the clinical symptoms and pathological appearances, partly because analogous conditions can be produced experimentally by such poisons as saponin and toluylendiamin, and partly because of the facts of bothriocephalus anaemia. The site of production of the toxin, or toxins, for it is possible that several may have the same effect on the blood, is possibly not always the same, but must often be the alimentary canal, as bothriocephalus anaemia proves. Not all persons affected with this intestinal tapeworm contract the disease, but only those in whose intestines the worm is dead and decomposing or sometimes only “sick.” The expulsion of the worm puts an end to the absorption of the toxin and the patients recover. No adequate explanation of the formation of the toxin in the immense majority of the cases, in which there is no tapeworm, has yet been given. It is certain that no organism as yet known is concerned.
The main cause of the disease isn't known. It's likely that there are many contributing factors. Severe malaria, syphilis, pregnancy, chronic gastrointestinal diseases, and chronic gas poisoning have all been linked to it in different cases, and it's likely that a genetic weakness in the bone marrow often plays a role since many cases have a family or hereditary history of the disease. The condition is now seen as a chronic toxemia, partly because of the clinical symptoms and pathological findings, partly because similar conditions can be caused experimentally by poisons like saponin and toluylendiamin, and partly due to the facts related to bothriocephalus anemia. The source of the toxin, or toxins, which may all affect the blood in the same way, probably isn't always the same, but it often must be the digestive tract, as shown by bothriocephalus anemia. Not everyone with this intestinal tapeworm develops the disease, only those whose intestines contain the dead and decomposing worm or sometimes just a "sick" one. Getting rid of the worm stops the absorption of the toxin and allows the patients to recover. There isn't a clear explanation for how the toxin forms in the vast majority of cases where there is no tapeworm. It's certain that no known organism is involved.
This toxaemia affects the marrow and through it the blood, the gastro-intestinal apparatus and the nervous system, especially the spinal cord, in different proportions in different cases. The effect upon the marrow is to alter the type of red corpuscle formation, causing a reversion to the embryonic condition, in which the nucleated red corpuscles are large (megaloblasts), and the corpuscles in the blood formed from them are also large, are apparently ill suited to the needs of the adult, and easily break down, as the deposits of iron in the liver, spleen, kidneys and marrow prove. Whether this reversion is due to an exhaustion of the normal process or to an inhibition of it is not definitely known. The result is that the circulating red corpuscles are enormously diminished; it is usual to find 1,000,000 or less in the cubic millimetre instead of the normal 5,000,000. Though the haemoglobin is of course absolutely diminished, it is always, in severe cases, present in relatively higher percentage than the red corpuscles, because the average red corpuscle is larger and contains more haemoglobin than the normal. The large nucleated red corpuscles (megaloblasts) with which the marrow is crowded, often appear in the blood.
This condition affects the bone marrow and, through it, the blood, the digestive system, and the nervous system, especially the spinal cord, in varying degrees depending on the case. The impact on the marrow alters the way red blood cells are produced, leading to a return to an earlier developmental stage where the nucleated red blood cells are large (megaloblasts), and the blood cells that develop from them are also large, which don't meet the needs of an adult and break down easily, as shown by the deposits of iron in the liver, spleen, kidneys, and marrow. It’s unclear whether this regression is due to a depletion of the normal process or a blocking of it. As a result, the number of circulating red blood cells drops significantly; it’s common to find 1,000,000 or fewer in a cubic millimeter instead of the normal 5,000,000. While the overall hemoglobin is definitely reduced, in severe cases, it’s usually present in a relatively higher percentage than the red blood cells because the average red blood cell is larger and contains more hemoglobin than normal. The large nucleated red blood cells (megaloblasts), which fill the marrow, often appear in the blood.
Other anaemias, such as those known as lymphadenoma, or Hodgkin’s disease, splenic anaemia, chloroma, leucanaemia and the anaemia pseudo-leucaemica of children, need not be described here, as they are either rare or their occurrence or nature is still too much under discussion.
Other types of anemia, like those called lymphadenoma, or Hodgkin’s disease, splenic anemia, chloroma, leukemia, and the pseudoleukemic anemia in children, don’t need to be described here, as they are either uncommon or their occurrence or nature is still widely debated.
The number and nature of the leucocytes in the blood bears no constant or necessary relation to the number or condition of the red corpuscles, and their variations depend on entirely different conditions. The number in the Leucocytosis. cubic millimetre is usually about 7000, but may vary in health from 5000 to 10,000. A diminution in their number is known as leucopenia, and is found in starvation, in some infective diseases, as for example in typhoid fever, in malaria and Malta fever, and in pernicious anaemia. An increase is very much more frequent, and is known as leucocytosis, though in this term is usually connoted a relative increase in the proportion of the polymorphonuclear neutrophile leucocytes. 85 Leucocytosis occurs under a great variety of conditions, normally to a slight extent during digestion, during pregnancy, and after violent exercise, and abnormally after haemorrhage, in the course of inflammations and many infective diseases, in malignant disease, in such toxic states as uraemia, and after the ingestion of nuclein and other substances. It does not occur in some infective diseases, the most important of which are typhoid fever, malaria, influenza, measles and uncomplicated tuberculosis. In all cases where it is sufficiently severe and long continued, the reserve space in the bone-marrow is filled up by the active proliferation of the leucocytes normally found there, and is used as a nursery for the leucocytes required in the blood. In many cases leucocytosis is known to be associated with the defence of the organism from injurious influences, and its amount depends on the relation between the severity of the attack and the power of resistance. There may be an increase in the proportions present in the blood of lymphocytes (lymphocytosis), and of eosinophile cells (eosinophilia). This latter change is associated specially with some forms of asthma, with certain skin diseases, and with the presence of animal parasites in the body, such as ankylostoma and filaria.
The number and type of white blood cells in the blood do not have a consistent or necessary connection to the number or condition of the red blood cells, and their fluctuations depend on completely different factors. The count per cubic millimeter is usually around 7,000 but can range from 5,000 to 10,000 in a healthy state. A decrease in their number is called leucopenia and can occur due to starvation, certain infectious diseases like typhoid fever, malaria, Malta fever, and pernicious anemia. An increase is much more common and is referred to as leucocytosis, usually indicating a relative increase in the proportion of polymorphonuclear neutrophil white blood cells. 85 Leucocytosis can happen under many different circumstances, mildly and normally during digestion, pregnancy, and after intense exercise, but abnormally after bleeding, during inflammation, and many infectious diseases, in cancer, in toxic states like uremia, and after consuming nuclein and other substances. It does not occur in some infectious diseases, notably typhoid fever, malaria, influenza, measles, and uncomplicated tuberculosis. In cases where it is severe and prolonged, the reserve space in the bone marrow gets filled up through the active production of the white blood cells normally present there, acting as a nursery for the white blood cells needed in the blood. In many instances, leucocytosis is linked with the body's defense against harmful influences, and its level depends on the balance between the severity of the attack and the resistance capacity. There may also be an increase in the proportions of lymphocytes (lymphocytosis) and eosinophils (eosinophilia). This latter change is particularly associated with certain types of asthma, specific skin diseases, and the presence of animal parasites in the body, such as ankylostoma and filaria.
The disease in which the number of leucocytes in the blood is greatest is leucocythaemia or leucaemia. There are two main forms of this disease, in both of which there are anaemia, enlargement of the spleen and lymphatic Leucaemia. glands, or of either of them, leucocytic hypertrophy of the bone-marrow, and deposits of leucocytes in the liver, kidney and other organs. The difference lies in the kind of leucocytes present in excess in the blood, blood-forming organs and deposits in the tissues. In the one form these are lymphocytes, which are found in health mainly in the marrow, the blood itself, the lymph glands and in the lymphatic tissue round the alimentary canal; in the other they are the kinds of leucocytes normally found in the bone-marrow-myelocytes, neutrophile, basophile and eosinophile, and polymorphonuclear cells, also neutrophile, basophile and eosinophile. The clinical course of the two forms may differ. The first, known as lymphatic leucaemia or lymphaemia, may be acute, and prove fatal in a few weeks or even days with rapidly advancing anaemia, or may be chronic and last for one or two years or longer. The second, known as spleno-myelogenous leucaemia or myelaemia, is almost always chronic, and may last for several years. Recovery does not take place, though remissions may occur. The use of the X-rays has been found to influence the course of this disease very favourably. The most recent view of the pathology of the disease is that it is due to an overgrowth of the bone-marrow leucocytes, analogous in some respects to tumour growth and caused by the removal of some controlling mechanism rather than by stimulation. The anaemia accompanying the disease is due partly to the leucocyte overgrowth, which takes up the space in the marrow belonging of right to red corpuscle formation and interferes with it.
The disease characterized by the highest number of white blood cells in the blood is leucocythaemia or leukemia. There are two main types of this disease, both of which involve anemia, enlargement of the spleen and lymphatic glands, or either one of them, overgrowth of white blood cells in the bone marrow, and deposits of white blood cells in the liver, kidneys, and other organs. The difference lies in the type of white blood cells that are present in excess in the blood, blood-forming organs, and tissue deposits. In one type, these cells are lymphocytes, which are typically found in healthy individuals mainly in the marrow, blood, lymph glands, and the lymphatic tissue surrounding the digestive tract; in the other type, they are the usual types of white blood cells found in the bone marrow—myelocytes, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, and polymorphonuclear cells. The clinical progression of the two types can vary. The first type, known as lymphatic leukemia or lymphaemia, can be acute and may be fatal within weeks or even days due to rapidly worsening anemia, or it can be chronic, lasting for one or two years or longer. The second type, known as spleno-myeloid leukemia or myelaemia, is almost always chronic and may persist for several years. While recovery is not possible, there may be periods of remission. The use of X-rays has been found to positively impact the course of this disease. The latest perspective on the pathology of the disease suggests that it results from an overgrowth of white blood cells in the bone marrow, somewhat similar to tumor growth and caused by the loss of some regulatory mechanism rather than by stimulation. The anemia associated with the disease is partly due to the overgrowth of white blood cells, which occupies the space in the marrow that rightfully belongs to the formation of red blood cells, interfering with that process.
1 The suffix -phile, Greek φιλεῖν, to love, prefer, is in scientific terminology frequently applied to substances that exhibit such preference for particular stains or reagents, the names of which form the first part of the word.
1 The suffix -phile, from the Greek φιλεῖν, meaning to love or prefer, is often used in scientific terms to describe substances that show a preference for specific stains or reagents, with the names of those stains or reagents making up the first part of the word.
BLOOD-LETTING. There are certain morbid conditions when a patient may obtain marked relief from the abstraction of a certain amount of blood, from three or four ounces up to twenty or even thirty in extreme cases. This may be effected by venesection, or the application of leeches, or more rarely by cupping (q.v.). Unfortunately, in years gone by, blood-letting was used to such excess, as a cure for almost every known disease, that public opinion is now extremely opposed to it. In certain pathological conditions, however, it brings relief and saves life when no other means would act with sufficient promptness to take its place.
BLOOD-LETTING. There are certain serious health conditions where a patient can find significant relief by removing a specific amount of blood, usually between three to four ounces, up to twenty or even thirty in extreme cases. This can be done through methods like venesection, using leeches, or less commonly, through cupping (q.v.). Unfortunately, in the past, blood-letting was overused as a treatment for nearly every known illness, leading to strong public opposition against it today. However, in certain medical situations, it can provide relief and save lives when no other treatment is fast enough to be effective.
Venesection, in which the blood is usually withdrawn from the median-basilic vein of the arm, has the disadvantage that it can only be performed by the medical man, and that the patient’s friends are generally very much opposed to the idea. But the public are not nearly so prejudiced against the use of leeches; and as the nurse in charge can be instructed to use these if occasion arises, this is the form of blood-letting usually practised to-day. From one to twelve leeches are applied at the time, the average leech withdrawing some two drachms of blood. Should this prove insufficient, as much again can be abstracted by the immediate application of hot fomentations to the wounds. They should always be applied over some bony prominence, that pressure may be effectively used to stop the haemorrhage afterwards. They should never be placed over superficial veins, or where there is much loose subcutaneous tissue. If, as is often the case, there is any difficulty in making them bite, the skin should be pricked at the desired spot with the point of a sterilized needle, and the leech will then attach itself without further trouble. Also they must be left to fall off of their own accord, the nurse never dragging them forcibly off. If cold and pressure fail to stop the subsequent haemorrhage, a little powdered alum or other styptic may be inserted in the wound. The following are the main indications for their use, though in some cases they are better replaced by venesection, (1) For stagnation of blood on the right side of the heart with constant dyspnoea, cyanosis, &c. In acute lung disease, the sudden obstruction to the passage of blood through the lungs throws such an increased strain on the right ventricle that it may dilate to the verge of paralysis; but by lessening the total volume of blood, the heart’s work is lightened for a time, and the danger at the moment tided over. This is a condition frequently met with in the early stages of acute pneumonia, pleurisy and bronchitis, when the obstruction is in the lungs, the heart being normal. But the same result is also met with as a result of failure of compensation with back pressure in certain forms of heart disease (q.v.). (2) To lower arterial tension. In the early stages of cerebral haemorrhage (before coma has supervened), when the heart is working vigorously and the tension of the pulse is high, a timely venesection may lead to arrest of the haemorrhage by lowering the blood pressure and so giving the blood in the ruptured vessel an opportunity to coagulate. (3) In various convulsive attacks, as in acute uraemia.
Bloodletting, where blood is usually taken from the median-basilic vein in the arm, has the downside of needing a medical professional to perform it, and patients’ friends often strongly oppose it. However, people are much less averse to using leeches; since the nurse can be trained to apply them when needed, this method is commonly used today. One to twelve leeches are used at a time, with an average leech drawing about two drachms of blood. If this isn't enough, additional blood can be drawn by applying hot compresses to the wounds. These compresses should always be placed over bony areas so that pressure can effectively be applied to stop any bleeding afterward. They should never be placed over superficial veins or where there is a lot of loose subcutaneous tissue. If there’s often a struggle to get the leeches to bite, the skin should be pricked at the right spot with a sterilized needle, and the leech will attach itself easily. They should be allowed to fall off on their own; the nurse should never pull them off forcibly. If cold and pressure don’t stop the bleeding afterward, a little powdered alum or another styptic can be placed in the wound. Here are the main reasons to use them, although sometimes venesection is a better option: (1) For blood stagnation on the right side of the heart with constant shortness of breath, cyanosis, etc. In acute lung disease, sudden blood flow obstruction can put a lot of strain on the right ventricle, which may stretch to the point of failure; however, by reducing the overall blood volume, the heart’s workload is temporarily eased, providing relief at that moment. This situation often occurs in the early stages of acute pneumonia, pleurisy, and bronchitis, when the obstruction is in the lungs but the heart is normal. The same effect can also happen due to heart disease with compensation failure and back pressure (q.v.). (2) To reduce arterial pressure. In the early stages of a cerebral hemorrhage (before the patient becomes comatose), when the heart is working hard and the pulse is tense, timely bloodletting can help stop the hemorrhage by lowering blood pressure, allowing clotting in the ruptured vessel. (3) In various convulsive disorders, such as acute uremia.
BLOOD-MONEY, colloquially, the reward for betraying a criminal to justice. More strictly it is used of the money-penalty paid in old days by a murderer to the kinsfolk of his victim. These fines completely protected the offender from the vengeance of the injured family. The system was common among the Scandinavian and Teutonic races previous to the introduction of Christianity, and a scale of payments, graduated according to the heinousness of the crime, was fixed by laws, which further settled who could exact the blood-money, and who were entitled to share it. Homicide was not the only crime thus expiable: blood-money could be exacted for all crimes of violence. Some acts, such as killing any one in a church or while asleep, or within the precincts of the royal palace, were “bot-less”; and the death penalty was inflicted. Such a criminal was outlawed, and his enemies could kill him wherever they found him.
BLOOD MONEY, commonly refers to the reward for informing on a criminal to the authorities. More specifically, it describes the monetary compensation paid by a murderer to the family of the victim in ancient times. These payments completely shielded the offender from retaliation by the victim's family. This practice was prevalent among Scandinavian and Teutonic tribes before the arrival of Christianity, and there were established laws that determined a scale of payments based on the severity of the crime. These laws also specified who could demand the blood-money and who had the right to share it. Homicide wasn't the only crime that could be settled this way; blood-money could be claimed for all violent crimes. Certain acts, like killing someone in a church, while they were asleep, or within the royal palace grounds, were considered “bot-less,” and the death penalty was imposed. Such a criminal was declared an outlaw, and anyone could kill them on sight.
BLOODSTONE, the popular name of the mineral heliotrope, which is a variety of dark green chalcedony or plasma, with bright red spots, splashes and streaks. The green colour is due to a chloritic mineral; the red to haematite. Some coarse kinds are opaque, resembling in this respect jasper, and some writers have sought to restrict the name “bloodstone” to green jasper, with red markings, thus making heliotrope a translucent and bloodstone an opaque stone, but, though convenient, such a distinction is not generally recognized. A good deal of bloodstone comes from India, where it occurs in the Deccan traps, and is cut and polished at Cambay. The stone is used for seals, knife-handles and various trivial ornaments. Bloodstone is not very widely distributed, but is found in the basaltic rocks of the Isle of Rum in the west of Scotland, and in a few other localities. Haematite (Gr. αἷμα, blood), or native peroxide of iron, is also sometimes called “bloodstone.”
BLOODSTONE, is the common name for the mineral heliotrope, which is a type of dark green chalcedony or plasma, featuring bright red spots, splashes, and streaks. The green color comes from a chloritic mineral, while the red comes from haematite. Some rougher varieties are opaque, similar to jasper, and some authors have tried to limit the term “bloodstone” to green jasper with red marks, suggesting that heliotrope is translucent and bloodstone is opaque. However, while this distinction is convenient, it isn’t widely accepted. A significant amount of bloodstone is sourced from India, where it’s found in the Deccan traps and is shaped and polished in Cambay. The stone is utilized for seals, knife handles, and other minor decorative items. Bloodstone isn’t commonly found, but it can be located in the basaltic rocks of the Isle of Rum in western Scotland, along with a few other places. Haematite (Gr. blood, blood), also known as native peroxide of iron, is at times referred to as “bloodstone.”
BLOOM (from A.S. blôma, a flower), the blossom of flowering plants, or the powdery film on the skin of fresh-picked fruit; hence applied to the surface of newly-minted coins or to a cloudy appearance on the varnish of painting due to moisture; also, in metallurgy, a term used of the rough billets of iron and steel, which have undergone a preliminary hammering or rolling, and are ready for further working.
BLOOM (from A.S. blôma, meaning a flower), refers to the blossom of flowering plants, or the powdery film on the skin of freshly picked fruit; it can also describe the surface of newly minted coins or a cloudy appearance on the varnish of a painting caused by moisture. In metallurgy, it's a term for rough pieces of iron and steel that have been partially hammered or rolled and are prepared for further processing.
BLOOMER, AMELIA JENKS (1818-1894), American dress-reformer and women’s rights advocate, was born at Homer, New 86 York, on the 27th of May 1818. After her marriage in 1840 she established a periodical called The Lily, which had some success. In 1849 she took up the idea—previously originated by Mrs Elizabeth Smith Miller—of a reform in woman’s dress, and the wearing of a short skirt, with loose trousers, gathered round the ankles. The name of “bloomers” gradually became popularly attached to any divided-skirt or knickerbocker dress for women. Until her death on the 30th of December 1894 Mrs Bloomer took a prominent part in the temperance campaign and in that for woman’s suffrage.
BLOOMER, AMELIA JENKS (1818-1894), an American dress reformer and advocate for women’s rights, was born in Homer, New 86 York, on May 27, 1818. After marrying in 1840, she launched a magazine called The Lily, which achieved some success. In 1849, she embraced the idea—originally proposed by Mrs. Elizabeth Smith Miller—of changing women’s clothing to include a short skirt with loose trousers, gathered at the ankles. The term “bloomers” gradually became widely associated with any divided-skirt or knickerbocker style of dress for women. Until her death on December 30, 1894, Mrs. Bloomer played a significant role in the temperance movement and the fight for women’s suffrage.
BLOOMFIELD, MAURICE (1855- ), American Sanskrit scholar, was born on the 23rd of February 1855, in Bielitz, Austrian Silesia. He went to the United States in 1867, and ten years later graduated from Furman University, Greenville, South Carolina. He then studied Sanskrit at Yale, under W.D. Whitney, and at Johns Hopkins, to which university he returned as associate professor in 1881 after a stay of two years in Berlin and Leipzig, and soon afterwards was promoted professor of Sanskrit and comparative philology. His papers in the American Journal of Philology number a few in comparative linguistics, such as those on assimilation and adaptation in congeneric classes of words, and many valuable “Contributions to the Interpretation of the Vedas,” and he is best known as a student of the Vedas. He translated, for Max-Müller’s Sacred Books of the East, the Hymns of the Atharva-Veda (1897); contributed to the Bühler-Kielhorn Grundriss der indo-arischen Philologie und Altertumskunde the section “The Atharva-Veda and the Gopatha Brahmana” (1899); was first to edit the Kauçika-Sutra (1890), and in 1907 published, in the Harvard Oriental series, A Vedic Concordance. In 1905 he published Cerberus, the Dog of Hades, a study in comparative mythology.
BLOOMFIELD, MAURICE (1855- ), American Sanskrit scholar, was born on February 23, 1855, in Bielitz, Austrian Silesia. He moved to the United States in 1867, and ten years later graduated from Furman University in Greenville, South Carolina. He then studied Sanskrit at Yale, under W.D. Whitney, and at Johns Hopkins, where he returned as an associate professor in 1881 after spending two years in Berlin and Leipzig. He was soon promoted to professor of Sanskrit and comparative philology. His papers in the American Journal of Philology include several in comparative linguistics, focusing on topics like assimilation and adaptation in related classes of words, and many valuable “Contributions to the Interpretation of the Vedas.” He is best known as a scholar of the Vedas. He translated the Hymns of the Atharva-Veda for Max-Müller’s Sacred Books of the East in 1897; contributed the section “The Atharva-Veda and the Gopatha Brahmana” to the Bühler-Kielhorn Grundriss der indo-arischen Philologie und Altertumskunde in 1899; was the first to edit the Kauçika-Sutra in 1890; and in 1907 published A Vedic Concordance in the Harvard Oriental series. In 1905, he published Cerberus, the Dog of Hades, a study in comparative mythology.
BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT (1766-1823), English poet, was born of humble parents at the village of Honington, Suffolk, on the 3rd of December 1766. He was apprenticed at the age of eleven to a farmer, but he was too small and frail for field labour, and four years later he came to London to work for a shoemaker. The poem that made his reputation, The Farmer’s Boy, was written in a garret in Bell Alley. The manuscript, declined by several publishers, fell into the hands of Capell Lofft, who arranged for its publication with woodcuts by Bewick in 1800. The success of the poem was remarkable, over 25,000 copies being sold in the next two years. His reputation was increased by the appearance of his Rural Tales (1802), News from the Farm (1804), Wild Flowers (1806) and The Banks of the Wye (1811). Influential friends attempted to provide for Bloomfield, but ill-health and possibly faults of temperament prevented the success of these efforts, and the poet died in poverty at Shefford, Bedfordshire, on the 19th of August 1823. His Remains in Poetry and Verse appeared in 1824.
BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT (1766-1823), an English poet, was born to humble parents in the village of Honington, Suffolk, on December 3, 1766. He was apprenticed to a farmer at the age of eleven, but he was too small and frail for field work, and four years later he moved to London to work as a shoemaker. The poem that established his reputation, The Farmer’s Boy, was written in a small room in Bell Alley. The manuscript, which was rejected by several publishers, eventually reached Capell Lofft, who arranged for its publication with woodcuts by Bewick in 1800. The poem's success was incredible, selling over 25,000 copies in the following two years. His reputation grew with the release of Rural Tales (1802), News from the Farm (1804), Wild Flowers (1806), and The Banks of the Wye (1811). Influential friends tried to support Bloomfield, but his poor health and perhaps some personal shortcomings hindered these efforts, and the poet passed away in poverty in Shefford, Bedfordshire, on August 19, 1823. His Remains in Poetry and Verse was published in 1824.
BLOOMFIELD, a town of Essex county, New Jersey, U.S.A., about 12 m. W. of New York, and directly adjoining the city of Newark on the N. Pop. (1900) 9668, of whom 2267 were foreign-born; (1905, state census) 11,668; (1910), 15,070. Area, 5.42 sq. m. Bloomfield is served by the Erie, and the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western railways, and by several electric lines connecting with Newark, Montclair, Orange, East Orange and other neighbouring places. It is a residential suburb of Newark and New York, is the seat of a German theological school (Presbyterian, 1869) and has the Jarvie Memorial library (1902). There is a Central Green, and in 1908 land was acquired for another park. Among the town’s manufactures are silk and woollen goods, paper, electric elevators, electric lamps, rubber goods, safety pins, hats, cream separators, brushes and novelties. The value of the town’s factory products increased from $3,370,924 in 1900 to $4,645,483 in 1905, or 37.8%. First settled about 1670-1675 by the Dutch and by New Englanders from the Newark colony, Bloomfield was long a part of Newark, the principal settlement at first being known as Wardsesson. In 1796 it was named Bloomfield in honour of General Joseph Bloomfield (1753-1823), who served (1775-1778) in the War of American Independence, reaching the rank of major, was governor of New Jersey in 1801-1802 and 1803-1812, brigadier-general in the United States army during the War of 1812, and a Democratic representative in Congress from 1817 to 1821. The township of Bloomfield was incorporated in 1812. From it were subsequently set off Belleville (1839), Montclair (1868) and Glen Ridge (1895).
BLOOMFIELD, is a town in Essex County, New Jersey, USA, about 12 miles west of New York City, directly adjacent to the city of Newark to the north. The population was 9,668 in 1900, with 2,267 being foreign-born; according to the state census in 1905, it had 11,668 residents, and by 1910, the population had grown to 15,070. The area covers 5.42 square miles. Bloomfield is served by the Erie and Delaware, Lackawanna & Western railways, as well as several electric lines that connect to Newark, Montclair, Orange, East Orange, and other nearby areas. It is a residential suburb of Newark and New York, home to a German theological school (Presbyterian, 1869) and the Jarvie Memorial Library (1902). There is a Central Green, and in 1908, land was acquired for another park. The town's manufacturing includes silk and woolen goods, paper, electric elevators and lamps, rubber products, safety pins, hats, cream separators, brushes, and various novelties. The value of the town's factory products increased from $3,370,924 in 1900 to $4,645,483 in 1905, a growth of 37.8%. First settled around 1670-1675 by the Dutch and New Englanders from the Newark colony, Bloomfield was originally part of Newark, with the main settlement known as Wardsesson. In 1796, it was renamed Bloomfield in honor of General Joseph Bloomfield (1753-1823), who served (1775-1778) in the War of American Independence, rose to the rank of major, was governor of New Jersey from 1801-1802 and 1803-1812, a brigadier general in the U.S. Army during the War of 1812, and a Democratic congressman from 1817 to 1821. The township of Bloomfield was incorporated in 1812. From it, Belleville (1839), Montclair (1868), and Glen Ridge (1895) were later established.
BLOOMINGTON, a city and the county-seat of McLean county, Illinois, U.S.A., in the central part of the state, about 125 m. S.W. of Chicago. Pop. (1890) 20,484; (1900) 23,286, of whom 3611 were foreign-born, there being a large German element; (1910 census) 25,768. The city is served by the Chicago & Alton, the Illinois Central, the Cleveland, Chicago, Cincinnati & St Louis, and the Lake Erie & Western railways, and by electric inter-urban lines. Bloomington is the seat of the Illinois Wesleyan University (Methodist Episcopal, co-educational, founded in 1850), which comprises a college of liberal arts, an academy, a college of law, a college of music and a school of oratory, and in 1907 had 1350 students. In the town of Normal (pop. in 1900, 3795), 2 m. north of Bloomington, are the Illinois State Normal University (opened at Bloomington in 1857 and removed to its present site in 1860), one of the first normal schools in the Middle West, and the state soldiers’ orphans’ home (1869). Bloomington has a public library, and Franklin and Miller parks; among its principal buildings are the court house, built of marble, and the Y.M.C.A. building. Among the manufacturing establishments are foundries and machine shops, including the large shops of the Chicago & Alton railway, slaughtering and meat-packing establishments, flour and grist mills, printing and publishing establishments, a caramel factory and lumber factories. The value of the city’s factory products increased from $3,011,899 in 1900 to $5,777,000 in 1905, or 91.8%. There are valuable coal mines in and near the city, and the city is situated in a fine farming region. Bloomington derives its name from Blooming Grove, a small forest which was crossed by the trails leading from the Galena lead mines to Southern Illinois, from Lake Michigan to St Louis, and from the Eastern to the far Western states. The first settlement was made in 1822, but the town was not formally founded until 1831, when it became the county-seat of McLean county. The first city charter was obtained in 1850, and in 1857 the public school system was established. In 1856 Bloomington was the meeting place of a state convention called by the Illinois editors who were opposed to the Kansas-Nebraska Bill (see DECATUR). This was the first convention of the Republican party in Illinois; among the delegates were Abraham Lincoln, Richard Yates, John M. Palmer and Owen Lovejoy. The city has been the residence of a number of prominent men, including David Davis (1815-1886), an associate justice of the United States Supreme Court in 1862-1877, a member of the United States Senate in 1877-1883, and president pro tempore of the Senate in 1881-1883; Governor John M. Hamilton (1847-1905), Governor Joseph W. Fifer (b. 1840); and Adlai Ewing Stevenson (b. 1835), a Democratic representative in Congress in 1875-1877 and 1879-1881, and vice-president of the United States in 1893-1897. Bloomington’s prosperity increased after 1867, when coal was first successfully mined in the vicinity.
BLOOMINGTON, is a city and the county seat of McLean County, Illinois, U.S.A., located in the central part of the state, about 125 miles southwest of Chicago. Population: (1890) 20,484; (1900) 23,286, with 3,611 foreign-born residents, predominantly German; (1910 census) 25,768. The city is served by the Chicago & Alton, the Illinois Central, the Cleveland, Chicago, Cincinnati & St. Louis, and the Lake Erie & Western railways, as well as electric inter-urban lines. Bloomington is home to Illinois Wesleyan University (Methodist Episcopal, co-ed, founded in 1850), which includes a college of liberal arts, an academy, a college of law, a college of music, and a school of oratory, and had 1,350 students in 1907. In the town of Standard (population in 1900, 3,795), 2 miles north of Bloomington, is the Illinois State Normal University (opened in Bloomington in 1857 and relocated to its current site in 1860), one of the first normal schools in the Midwest, along with the state soldiers’ orphans’ home (established in 1869). Bloomington has a public library and Franklin and Miller parks; its prominent buildings include a marble courthouse and the Y.M.C.A. building. The manufacturing sector includes foundries and machine shops, such as the large shops of the Chicago & Alton railway, along with slaughterhouses, meat-packing plants, flour and grist mills, printing and publishing businesses, a caramel factory, and lumber mills. The value of the city’s factory products rose from $3,011,899 in 1900 to $5,777,000 in 1905, an increase of 91.8%. There are valuable coal mines in and around the city, which is located in a rich farming area. Bloomington gets its name from Blooming Grove, a small forest crossed by trails leading from the Galena lead mines to Southern Illinois, from Lake Michigan to St. Louis, and from the Eastern to the far Western states. The first settlement was made in 1822, but the town wasn’t officially established until 1831, when it became the county seat of McLean County. The first city charter was granted in 1850, and the public school system was established in 1857. In 1856, Bloomington hosted a state convention called by Illinois editors opposed to the Kansas-Nebraska Bill (see DECATUR). This was the first convention of the Republican party in Illinois, attended by delegates including Abraham Lincoln, Richard Yates, John M. Palmer, and Owen Lovejoy. The city has been home to several notable individuals, including David Davis (1815-1886), an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1862 to 1877, a U.S. Senator from 1877 to 1883, and president pro tempore of the Senate from 1881 to 1883; Governor John M. Hamilton (1847-1905); Governor Joseph W. Fifer (b. 1840); and Adlai Ewing Stevenson (b. 1835), a Democratic Congressman from 1875 to 1877 and again from 1879 to 1881, and vice president of the United States from 1893 to 1897. Bloomington’s prosperity grew after 1867, when coal was first successfully mined in the area.
In the Transactions of the Illinois State Historical Society for 1905 may be found a paper, “The Bloomington Convention of 1856 and Those Who Participated in it.”
In the Transactions of the Illinois State Historical Society for 1905, there is a paper titled “The Bloomington Convention of 1856 and Those Who Participated in It.”
BLOOMINGTON, a city and the county-seat of Monroe county, Indiana, U.S.A., about 45 m. S. by W. of Indianapolis. Pop. (1890) 4018; (1900) 6460, including 396 negroes; (1910) 8838. It is served by the Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville and the Indianapolis Southern (Illinois Central) railways. Bloomington is the seat of the Indiana University (co-educational since 1868), established as a state seminary in 1820, and as Indiana College in 1828, and chartered as the State university in 1838; in 1907-1908 it had 80 instructors, 2051 students, and a library of 65,000 volumes; its school of law was established in 1842, suspended in 1877 and re-established in 1889; its school of medicine was established in 1903; but most of the medical course is given in Indianapolis; a graduate school was organized in 1904; and a summer school (or summer term of eleven weeks) was first 87 held in 1905. Dr David Starr Jordan was the first president of the university in 1885-1891, when it was thoroughly reorganized and its curriculum put on the basis of major subjects and departments. The university’s biological station is on Winona Lake, Kosciusko county. Among the manufactures of Bloomington are furniture and wooden ware. There are valuable limestone quarries in the vicinity. The city was first settled about 1818.
BLOOMINGTON, is a city and the county seat of Monroe County, Indiana, U.S.A., located about 45 miles south by west of Indianapolis. Population: (1890) 4,018; (1900) 6,460, including 396 Black residents; (1910) 8,838. It is served by the Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville and the Indianapolis Southern (Illinois Central) railroads. Bloomington is home to Indiana University (co-educational since 1868), which started as a state seminary in 1820, became Indiana College in 1828, and was chartered as the State University in 1838. In the 1907-1908 academic year, it had 80 instructors, 2,051 students, and a library with 65,000 volumes. The law school was established in 1842, suspended in 1877, and re-established in 1889; the medical school was founded in 1903, with most of the medical courses offered in Indianapolis. A graduate school was set up in 1904, and the first summer school (an eleven-week session) took place in 1905. Dr. David Starr Jordan served as the first president of the university from 1885 to 1891, during which it underwent a complete reorganization and established a curriculum based on major subjects and departments. The university’s biological station is located on Winona Lake in Kosciusko County. Bloomington produces various goods, including furniture and wooden products. There are also valuable limestone quarries nearby. The city was first settled around 1818.
BLOOMSBURG, a town and the county-seat of Columbia county, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., on Fishing Creek, 2 m. from its confluence with the Susquehanna, and about 40 m. S.W. of Wilkes-Barre. Pop. (1890) 4635; (1900) 6170 (213 foreign-born); (1910) 7413. It is served by the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western, the Philadelphia & Reading, and the Bloomsburg & Sullivan and the Susquehanna, Bloomsburg & Berwick railways (the last two only 30 m. and 39 m. long respectively); and is connected with Berwick, Catawissa and Danville by electric lines. The town is built on a bluff commanding extensive views. Among the manufactures of Bloomsburg are railway cars, carriages, silk and woollen goods, furniture, carpets, wire-drawing machines and gun carriages. Iron ore was formerly obtained from the neighbouring hills. The town is the seat of a state normal school, established as such in 1869. Bloomsburg was laid out as a town in 1802, became the county-seat in 1846, and was incorporated in 1870.
BLOOMSBURG, is a town and the county seat of Columbia County, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., located on Fishing Creek, 2 miles from where it joins the Susquehanna River, and about 40 miles southwest of Wilkes-Barre. Population: (1890) 4,635; (1900) 6,170 (213 foreign-born); (1910) 7,413. It is served by the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western, the Philadelphia & Reading, and the Bloomsburg & Sullivan and Susquehanna, Bloomsburg & Berwick railways (the last two are only 30 miles and 39 miles long, respectively); and is connected to Berwick, Catawissa, and Danville by electric lines. The town is built on a bluff with expansive views. Among the things manufactured in Bloomsburg are railway cars, carriages, silk and wool goods, furniture, carpets, wire-drawing machines, and gun carriages. Iron ore used to be extracted from the nearby hills. The town is home to a state normal school, established in 1869. Bloomsburg was officially laid out as a town in 1802, became the county seat in 1846, and was incorporated in 1870.
BLOUNT, CHARLES (1654-1693), English author, was born at Upper Holloway on the 27th of April 1654. His father, Sir Henry Blount (1602-1682), was the author of a Voyage to the Levant, describing his own travels. He gave his son a careful education, and is said to have helped him in his Anima Mundi; or An Historical Narration of the Opinions of the Antients concerning Man’s Soul after his Life, according to unenlightened Nature (1679), which gave great offence by the sceptical views expressed in it. It was suppressed by order of the bishop of London, and even burnt by some over-zealous official, but a re-issue was permitted. Blount was an admirer of Hobbes, and published his “Last Sayings” (1679), a pamphlet consisting of extracts from The Leviathan. Great is Diana of the Ephesians, or the Original of Idolatry, together with the Political Institution of the Gentiles’ Sacrifices (1680) attracted severe criticism on the ground that in deprecating the evils of priestcraft Blount was attacking Christianity itself. His best-known book, The Two First Books of Philostratus concerning the Life of Apollonius Tyaneus... (1680), is said to have been prohibited in 1693, chiefly on account of the notes, which are stated by Bayle (note, s.v. Apollonius) to have been taken mainly from a MS. of Lord Herbert of Cherbury. Blount contributed materially to the removal of the restrictions on the freedom of the press, with two pamphlets (1693) by “Philopatris,” mainly derived from Milton’s Areopagitica. He also laid a successful trap for the censor, Edmund Bohun. Under the name of “Junius Brutus” he wrote a pamphlet entitled “King William and Queen Mary Conquerors.” The title-page set forth the theory of the justice of title by conquest, which Blount knew to be agreeable to Bohun. It was duly licensed, but was ordered by the House of Commons to be burnt by the common hangman, as being diametrically opposed to the attitude of William’s government on the subject. These proceedings showed the futility of the censorship, and hastened its overthrow.
BLOUNT, CHARLES (1654-1693), English author, was born in Upper Holloway on April 27, 1654. His father, Sir Henry Blount (1602-1682), wrote a Voyage to the Levant, detailing his travels. He provided his son with a thorough education and is said to have assisted him in writing Anima Mundi; or An Historical Narration of the Opinions of the Antients concerning Man’s Soul after his Life, according to unenlightened Nature (1679), which caused a lot of controversy due to its skeptical views. It was banned by the bishop of London and even burned by some overzealous official, but it was later allowed to be reissued. Blount admired Hobbes and published his “Last Sayings” (1679), a pamphlet featuring excerpts from The Leviathan. His book, Great is Diana of the Ephesians, or the Original of Idolatry, together with the Political Institution of the Gentiles’ Sacrifices (1680), faced severe backlash because critics claimed it undermined Christianity by criticizing priestcraft. His most famous work, The Two First Books of Philostratus concerning the Life of Apollonius Tyaneus... (1680), is said to have been banned in 1693, primarily due to the notes that Bayle (note, s.v. Apollonius) claims were largely taken from a manuscript by Lord Herbert of Cherbury. Blount played a significant role in lifting restrictions on press freedom with two pamphlets (1693) published under the name “Philopatris,” primarily inspired by Milton’s Areopagitica. He also successfully ensnared the censor, Edmund Bohun. Writing as “Junius Brutus,” he produced a pamphlet titled “King William and Queen Mary Conquerors.” The title page presented the theory of rightful title by conquest, which Blount knew Bohun would find favorable. It was licensed but subsequently ordered by the House of Commons to be burned by the common hangman for being completely against William’s government’s stance on the issue. These actions demonstrated the ineffectiveness of censorship and sped up its downfall.
Blount had fallen in love with his deceased wife’s sister, and, in despair of overcoming her scruples as to the legality of such a marriage, shot himself in the head. He survived for some time, refusing help except from his sister-in-law. Alexander Pope asserted (Epilogue to the Satires, Note, i. 124) that he wounded himself in the arm, pretending to kill himself, and that the result was fatal contrary to his expectations. He died in August 1693.
Blount had fallen in love with his late wife's sister, and, feeling hopeless about overcoming her concerns about the legality of such a marriage, shot himself in the head. He lived for a while, only accepting help from his sister-in-law. Alexander Pope claimed (Epilogue to the Satires, Note, i. 124) that he shot himself in the arm, pretending to end his life, and that it ended up being fatal, which was not what he had expected. He died in August 1693.
Shortly before his death a collection of his pamphlets and private papers was printed with a preface by Charles Gildon, under the title of the Oracles of Reason. His Miscellaneous Works (1695) is a fuller edition by the same editor.
Shortly before he died, a collection of his pamphlets and private papers was published with a preface by Charles Gildon, titled Oracles of Reason. His Miscellaneous Works (1695) is a more complete edition by the same editor.
BLOUNT (or Blunt), EDWARD (b. 1565?), the printer, in conjunction with Isaac Jaggard, of Mr William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories and Tragedies. Published according to the true Originall Copies (1623), usually known as the first folio of Shakespeare. It was produced under the direction of John Heming (d. 1630) and Henry Condell (d. 1627), both of whom had been Shakespeare’s colleagues at the Globe theatre, but as Blount combined the functions of printer and editor on other occasions, it is fair to conjecture that he to some extent edited the first folio. The Stationers’ Register states that he was the son of Ralph Blount or Blunt, merchant tailor of London, and apprenticed himself in 1578 for ten years to William Ponsonby, a stationer. He became a freeman of the Stationers’ Company in 1588. Among the most important of his publications are Giovanni Florio’s Italian-English dictionary and his translation of Montaigne, Marlowe’s Hero and Leander, and the Sixe Court Comedies of John Lyly. He himself translated Ars Aulica, or the Courtier’s Arte (1607) from the Italian of Lorenzo Ducci, and Christian Policie (1632) from the Spanish of Juan de Santa Maria.
BLOUNT (or Straightforward), EDWARD (b. 1565?), was a printer who, along with Isaac Jaggard, published Mr William Shakespeare's Comedies, Histories and Tragedies. Published according to the true Original Copies (1623), commonly known as Shakespeare's first folio. This was produced under the guidance of John Heming (d. 1630) and Henry Condell (d. 1627), both of whom were Shakespeare's colleagues at the Globe Theatre. However, since Blount often took on the roles of both printer and editor, it's reasonable to assume he edited the first folio to some degree. The Stationers’ Register indicates that he was the son of Ralph Blount or Blunt, a merchant tailor in London, and he became an apprentice to William Ponsonby, a stationer, for ten years starting in 1578. He became a member of the Stationers’ Company in 1588. Among his most significant publications are Giovanni Florio's Italian-English dictionary, his translation of Montaigne, Marlowe’s Hero and Leander, and the Sixe Court Comedies of John Lyly. He also translated Ars Aulica, or the Courtier’s Arte (1607) from the Italian of Lorenzo Ducci, and Christian Policie (1632) from the Spanish of Juan de Santa Maria.
BLOUNT, THOMAS (1618-1679), English antiquarian, was the son of one Myles Blount, of Orleton in Herefordshire. He was born at Bordesley, Worcestershire. Few details of his life are known. It appears that he was called to the bar at the Inner Temple, but, being a zealous Roman Catholic, his religion interfered considerably with the practice of his profession. Retiring to his estate at Orleton, he devoted himself to the study of the law as an amateur, and also read widely in other branches of knowledge. He died at Orleton on the 26th of December 1679. His principal works are Glossographia; or, a dictionary interpreting the hard words of whatsoever language, now used in our refined English tongue (1656, reprinted in 1707), which went through several editions and remains most amusing and instructive reading; Nomolexicon: a law dictionary interpreting such difficult and, obscure words and terms as are found either in our common or statute, ancient or modern lawes (1670; third edition, with additions by W. Nelson, 1717); and Fragmenta Antiquitatis: Ancient Tenures of land, and jocular customs of some mannors (1679; enlarged by J. Beckwith and republished, with additions by H.M. Beckwith, in 1815; again revised and enlarged by W.C. Hazlitt, 1874). Blount’s Boscobel (1651), giving an account of Charles II.’s preservation after Worcester, with the addition of the king’s own account dictated to Pepys, has been edited with a bibliography by C.G. Thomas (1894).
BLOUNT, THOMAS (1618-1679), an English antiquarian, was the son of a man named Myles Blount from Orleton in Herefordshire. He was born in Bordesley, Worcestershire. There are few details about his life. It seems he was called to the bar at the Inner Temple, but as a devoted Roman Catholic, his faith significantly impacted his ability to practice law. He moved to his estate in Orleton, where he engaged in the study of law as an amateur and explored other areas of knowledge as well. He passed away in Orleton on December 26, 1679. His main works include Glossographia; or, a dictionary interpreting the hard words of whatsoever language, now used in our refined English tongue (1656, reprinted in 1707), which went through several editions and is still considered entertaining and informative; Nomolexicon: a law dictionary interpreting such difficult and obscure words and terms as are found either in our common or statute, ancient or modern lawes (1670; third edition, with additions by W. Nelson, 1717); and Fragmenta Antiquitatis: Ancient Tenures of land, and jocular customs of some mannors (1679; expanded by J. Beckwith and republished with additions by H.M. Beckwith in 1815; later revised and enlarged by W.C. Hazlitt in 1874). Blount’s Boscobel (1651), which recounts Charles II.’s survival after the Battle of Worcester, includes the king’s own narrative as told to Pepys and has been edited with a bibliography by C.G. Thomas (1894).
BLOUNT, SIR THOMAS POPE (1649-1697), English author, eldest son of Sir Henry Blount and brother of Charles Blount (q.v.), was born at Upper Holloway on the 12th of September 1649. He succeeded to the estate of Tittenhanger on his mother’s death in 1678, and in the following year was created a baronet. He represented the borough of St Albans in the two last parliaments of Charles II. and was knight of the shire from the revolution till his death. He married Jane, daughter of Sir Henry Caesar, by whom he had five sons and nine daughters. He died at Tittenhanger on the 30th of June 1697. His Censura celebrorum authorum sive tractatus in quo varia virorum doctorum de clarissimis cujusque seculi scriptoribus judicia traduntur (1690) was originally compiled for Blount’s own use, and is a dictionary in chronological order of what various eminent writers have said about one another. This necessarily involved enormous labour in Blount’s time. It was published at Geneva in 1694 with all the quotations from modern languages translated into Latin, and again in 1710. His other works are A Natural History, containing many not common observations extracted out of the best modern writers (1693), De re poetica, or remarks upon Poetry, with Characters and Censures of the most considerable Poets.... (1694), and Essays on Several Occasions (1692). It is on this last work that his claims to be regarded as an original writer rest. The essays deal with the perversion of learning, a comparison between the ancients and the moderns (to the advantage of the latter), the education of children, and kindred topics. In the third edition (1697) he added an eighth essay, on religion, in which he deprecated the multiplication of ceremonies. He displays throughout a hatred of pedantry and convention, which makes his book still interesting.
BLOUNT, SIR THOMAS POPE (1649-1697), English author, was born on September 12, 1649, at Upper Holloway. He was the eldest son of Sir Henry Blount and the brother of Charles Blount (q.v.). He inherited the Tittenhanger estate after his mother passed away in 1678 and became a baronet the following year. Blount served as the representative for the borough of St Albans in the last two parliaments of Charles II and was a knight of the shire from the revolution until his death. He married Jane, the daughter of Sir Henry Caesar, and they had five sons and nine daughters. He passed away at Tittenhanger on June 30, 1697. His work, Censura celebrorum authorum sive tractatus in quo varia virorum doctorum de clarissimis cujusque seculi scriptoribus judicia traduntur (1690), was originally compiled for his own use and is a chronological dictionary of opinions various eminent writers had about one another. This required immense effort during Blount’s time. It was published in Geneva in 1694, with all modern language quotes translated into Latin, and again in 1710. His other works include A Natural History, containing many not common observations extracted out of the best modern writers (1693), De re poetica, or remarks upon Poetry, with Characters and Censures of the most considerable Poets.... (1694), and Essays on Several Occasions (1692). His claim to be seen as an original writer is based largely on the last work. The essays cover topics like the perversion of learning, a comparison between the ancients and the moderns (favoring the latter), the education of children, and related subjects. In the third edition (1697), he included an eighth essay on religion, where he criticized the excessive number of ceremonies. He consistently expresses a disdain for pedantry and convention, which keeps his book relevant today.
See A. Kippis, Biographia Britannica (1780), vol. ii. For an account of Blount’s family see Robert Clutterbuck. History and Antiquities of the County of Hertford (1815), vol. i. pp. 207-212.
See A. Kippis, Biographia Britannica (1780), vol. ii. For information about Blount’s family, check out Robert Clutterbuck. History and Antiquities of the County of Hertford (1815), vol. i. pp. 207-212.
BLOUNT, WILLIAM (1749-1800), American politician, was born in Bertie county, North Carolina, on the 26th of March 1749. He was a member of the Continental Congress in 1783-1784 and again in 1786-1787, of the constitutional convention at Philadelphia in 1787, and of the state convention which ratified the Federal constitution for North Carolina in 1789. From 1790 until 1796 he was, by President Washington’s appointment, governor of the “Territory South of the Ohio River,” created out of land ceded to the national government by North Carolina in 1789. He was also during this period the superintendent of Indian affairs for this part of the country. In 1791 he laid out Knoxville (Tennessee) as the seat of government. He presided over the constitutional convention of Tennessee in 1796, and, on the state being admitted to the Union, became one of its first representatives in the United States Senate. In 1797 his connexion became known with a scheme, since called “Blount’s Conspiracy,” which provided for the co-operation of the American frontiersmen, assisted by Indians, and an English force, in the seizure on behalf of Great Britain of the Floridas and Louisiana, then owned by Spain, with which power England was then at war. As this scheme, if carried out, involved the corrupting of two officials of the United States, an Indian agent and an interpreter, a breach of the neutrality of the United States, and the breach of Article V. of the treaty of San Lorenzo el Real (signed on the 27th of October 1795) between the United States and Spain, by which each power agreed not to incite the Indians to attack the other, Blount was impeached by the House of Representatives on the 7th of July 1797, and on the following day was formally expelled from the Senate for “having been guilty of high misdemeanor, entirely inconsistent with his public trust and duty as a senator.” On the 29th of January 1798 articles of impeachment were adopted by the House of Representatives. On the 14th of January 1799, however, the Senate, sitting as a court of impeachment, decided that it had no jurisdiction, Blount not then being a member of the Senate, and, in the Senate’s opinion, not having been, even as a member, a civil officer of the United States, within the meaning of the constitution. The case is significant as being the first case of impeachment brought before the United States Senate. “In a legal point of view, all that the case decides is that a senator of the United States who has been expelled from his seat is not after such expulsion subject to impeachment” (Francis Wharton, State Trials). In effect, however, it also decided that a member of Congress was not in the meaning of the constitution a civil officer of the United States and therefore could not be impeached. The “conspiracy” was disavowed by the British government, which, however, seems to have secretly favoured it. Blount was enthusiastically supported by his constituents, and upon his return to Tennessee was made a member and the presiding officer of the state senate. He died at Knoxville on the 21st of March 1800.
BLOUNT, WILLIAM (1749-1800), American politician, was born in Bertie County, North Carolina, on March 26, 1749. He served as a member of the Continental Congress from 1783 to 1784 and again from 1786 to 1787, participated in the constitutional convention in Philadelphia in 1787, and was part of the state convention that ratified the Federal Constitution for North Carolina in 1789. From 1790 until 1796, he was appointed by President Washington as governor of the “Territory South of the Ohio River,” which was created from land ceded to the national government by North Carolina in 1789. During this time, he was also the superintendent of Indian affairs for that region. In 1791, he established Knoxville (Tennessee) as the seat of government. He chaired the constitutional convention of Tennessee in 1796, and when the state was admitted to the Union, he became one of its first representatives in the United States Senate. In 1797, his involvement in what came to be known as “Blount’s Conspiracy” was revealed. This plan aimed for the cooperation of American frontiersmen, aided by Native Americans and a British force, to seize Florida and Louisiana, which were then held by Spain, with which Britain was at war. Since this scheme involved the corruption of two U.S. officials—a Native American agent and an interpreter—it violated U.S. neutrality and Article V of the Treaty of San Lorenzo el Real (signed October 27, 1795) that prohibited inciting Native American attacks against either nation. On July 7, 1797, the House of Representatives impeached Blount, and the following day he was expelled from the Senate for “having been guilty of high misdemeanor, entirely inconsistent with his public trust and duty as a senator.” On January 29, 1798, the House adopted articles of impeachment against him. However, on January 14, 1799, the Senate, acting as a court of impeachment, ruled it had no jurisdiction since Blount was not a current member of the Senate and, in their view, had never been a civil officer of the United States as defined by the Constitution. This case is notable as the first impeachment case brought before the United States Senate. “Legally, all that the case determines is that a senator who has been expelled from his seat is not subject to impeachment after such expulsion” (Francis Wharton, State Trials). Essentially, it also established that a member of Congress is not considered a civil officer of the United States and cannot be impeached. The British government disavowed the “conspiracy,” although they seemingly supported it secretly. Blount received overwhelming support from his constituents and, upon returning to Tennessee, became a member and the presiding officer of the state senate. He died in Knoxville on March 21, 1800.
For a defence of Blount, see General Marcus J. Wright’s Account of the Life and Services of William Blount (Washington, D.C., 1884).
For a defense of Blount, see General Marcus J. Wright’s Account of the Life and Services of William Blount (Washington, D.C., 1884).
BLOUSE, a word (taken from the French) used for any loosely fitting bodice belted at the waist. In France it meant originally the loose upper garment of linen or cotton, generally blue, worn by French workmen to preserve their clothing, and, by transference, the workman himself.
BLOUSE, is a term (borrowed from French) that refers to any loosely fitting top that is cinched at the waist. In France, it originally described a loose upper garment made of linen or cotton, usually blue, that workers wore to protect their clothes, and by extension, it came to refer to the workers themselves.
BLOW, JOHN (1648-1708), English musical composer, was born in 1648, probably at North Collingham in Nottinghamshire. He became a chorister of the chapel royal, and distinguished himself by his proficiency in music; he composed several anthems at an unusually early age, including Lord, Thou hast been our refuge; Lord, rebuke me not; and the so-called “club anthem,” I will always give thanks, the last in collaboration with Pelham Humphrey and William Turner, either in honour of a victory over the Dutch in 1665, or—more probably—simply to commemorate the friendly intercourse of the three choristers. To this time also belongs the composition of a two-part setting of Herrick’s Goe, perjur’d man, written at the request of Charles II. to imitate Carissimi’s Dite, o cieli. In 1669 Blow became organist of Westminster Abbey. In 1673 he was made a gentleman of the chapel royal, and in the September of this year he was married to Elizabeth Braddock, who died in childbirth ten years later. Blow, who by the year 1678 was a doctor of music, was named in 1685 one of the private musicians of James II. Between 1680 and 1687 he wrote the only stage composition by him of which any record survives, the Masque for the Entertainment of the King: Venus and Adonis. In this Mary Davies played the part of Venus, and her daughter by Charles II., Lady Mary Tudor, appeared as Cupid. In 1687 he became master of the choir of St Paul’s church; in 1695 he was elected organist of St Margaret’s, Westminster, and is said to have resumed his post as organist of Westminster Abbey, from which in 1680 he had retired or been dismissed to make way for Purcell. In 1699 he was appointed to the newly created post of composer to the chapel royal. Fourteen services and more than a hundred anthems by Blow are extant. In addition to his purely ecclesiastical music Blow wrote Great sir, the joy of all our hearts, an ode for New Year’s day 1681-1682; similar compositions for 1683, 1686, 1687, 1688, 1689, 1693 (?), 1694 and 1700; odes, &c., for the celebration of St Cecilia’s day for 1684, 1691, 1695 and 1700; for the coronation of James II. two anthems, Behold, O God, our Defender, and God spake sometimes in visions; some harpsichord pieces for the second part of Playford’s Musick’s Handmaid (1869); Epicedium for Queen Mary (1695); Ode on the Death of Purcell (1696). In 1700 he published his Amphion Anglicus, a collection of pieces of music for one, two, three and four voices, with a figured-bass accompaniment. A famous page in Burney’s History of Music is devoted to illustrations of “Dr Blow’s Crudities,” most of which only show the meritorious if immature efforts in expression characteristic of English music at the time, while some of them (where Burney says “Here we are lost”) are really excellent. Blow died on the 1st of October 1708 at his house in Broad Sanctuary, and was buried in the north aisle of Westminster Abbey.
BLOW, JOHN (1648-1708), was an English composer born in 1648, likely in North Collingham, Nottinghamshire. He became a chorister at the Chapel Royal and stood out for his musical talent; he composed several anthems at a remarkably young age, including Lord, Thou hast been our refuge; Lord, rebuke me not; and the so-called "club anthem," I will always give thanks, which he co-wrote with Pelham Humphrey and William Turner, either to celebrate a victory over the Dutch in 1665 or—more likely—just to honor the camaraderie among the three choristers. This period also saw the creation of a two-part setting of Herrick’s Goe, perjur’d man, written at the request of Charles II. to mimic Carissimi’s Dite, o cieli. In 1669, Blow became the organist at Westminster Abbey. By 1673, he was appointed a gentleman of the Chapel Royal, and in September of that year, he married Elizabeth Braddock, who died ten years later during childbirth. By 1678, Blow had earned a doctorate in music and was named one of James II’s private musicians in 1685. Between 1680 and 1687, he wrote the only known stage work attributed to him, the Masque for the Entertainment of the King: Venus and Adonis, in which Mary Davies played Venus, and her daughter by Charles II., Lady Mary Tudor, acted as Cupid. In 1687, he became master of the choir at St Paul’s Church; in 1695, he was elected organist of St Margaret’s, Westminster, and it’s said he resumed his position as organist at Westminster Abbey, from which he had retired or been dismissed in 1680 to make way for Purcell. In 1699, he was appointed to the newly established role of composer to the Chapel Royal. Over fourteen services and more than a hundred anthems by Blow still exist. Besides his strictly church music, Blow wrote Great sir, the joy of all our hearts, an ode for New Year’s Day 1681-1682; similar works for 1683, 1686, 1687, 1688, 1689, 1693 (?), 1694, and 1700; odes for the celebration of St Cecilia’s Day in 1684, 1691, 1695, and 1700; two anthems for the coronation of James II., Behold, O God, our Defender, and God spake sometimes in visions; some harpsichord pieces for the second part of Playford’s Musick’s Handmaid (1869); Epicedium for Queen Mary (1695); and Ode on the Death of Purcell (1696). In 1700, he published his Amphion Anglicus, a collection of music pieces for one, two, three, and four voices, with a figured-bass accompaniment. A famous section in Burney’s History of Music showcases “Dr. Blow’s Crudities,” most of which highlight the promising but immature expressions typical of English music at that time, while some of them (where Burney notes “Here we are lost”) are genuinely excellent. Blow passed away on October 1, 1708, at his home in Broad Sanctuary and was buried in the north aisle of Westminster Abbey.
BLOW-GUN, a weapon consisting of a long tube, through which, by blowing with the mouth, arrows or other missiles can be shot accurately to a considerable distance. Blow-guns are used both in warefare and the chase by the South American Indian tribes inhabiting the region between the Amazon and Orinoco rivers, and by the Dyaks of Borneo. In the 18th century they were also known to certain North American Indians, especially the Choctaws and Cherokees of the lower Mississippi. Captain Bossu, in his Travels through Louisiana (1756), says of the Choctaws: “They are very expert in shooting with an instrument made of reeds about 7 ft. long, into which they put a little arrow feathered with the wool of the thistle (wild cotton?).” The blow-guns of the South American Indians differ in style and workmanship. That of the Macusis of Guiana, called pucuna, is the most perfect. It is made of two tubes, the inner of which, called oorah, is a light reed ½ in. in diameter which often grows to a length of 15 ft. without a joint. This is enclosed, for protection and solidity, in an outer tube of a variety of palm (Iriartella setigera). The mouth-piece is made of a circlet of silk-grass, and the farther end is feruled with a kind of nut, forming a sight. A rear open sight is formed of two teeth of a small rodent. The length of the pucuna is about 11 ft. and its weight 1½ ℔ The arrows, which are from 12 to 18 in. long and very slender, are made of ribs of the cocorite palm-leaf. They are usually feathered with a tuft of wild cotton, but some have in place of the cotton a thin strip of bark curled into a cone, which, when the shooter blows into the pucuna, expands and completely fills the tube, thus avoiding windage. Another kind of arrow is furnished with fibres of bark fixed along the shaft, imparting a rotary motion to the missile, a primitive example of the theory of the rifle. The arrows used in Peru are only a few inches long and as thin as fine knitting-needles. All South American blow-gun arrows are steeped in poison. The natives shoot very accurately with the pucuna at distances up to 50 or 60 yds.
BLOWGUN, is a weapon made of a long tube that allows arrows or other projectiles to be shot accurately over a significant distance by blowing into it. Blow-guns are used in both warfare and hunting by South American Indian tribes living between the Amazon and Orinoco rivers, as well as by the Dyaks of Borneo. In the 18th century, they were also known to some North American Indians, especially the Choctaws and Cherokees of the lower Mississippi. Captain Bossu, in his Travels through Louisiana (1756), described the Choctaws: “They are very skilled at shooting with a device made of reeds about 7 ft. long, into which they place a small arrow feathered with thistle wool (wild cotton?).” The blow-guns used by South American Indians vary in design and craftsmanship. The Macusis of Guiana have the most advanced version, called pucuna. It's made of two tubes; the inner one, called oorah, is a lightweight reed about ½ in. in diameter that can grow up to 15 ft. long without a joint. This reed is covered by an outer tube made from a type of palm (Iriartella setigera) for protection and sturdiness. The mouthpiece is a circle of silk-grass, and the rear end is fitted with a type of nut that acts as a sight. An open sight at the back consists of two teeth from a small rodent. The total length of the pucuna is about 11 ft. and it weighs 1½ ℔. The arrows, ranging from 12 to 18 in. long and very thin, are made from the ribs of the cocorite palm leaf. They are typically feathered with a tuft of wild cotton, although some feature a thin strip of bark rolled into a cone, which expands and fills the tube when the shooter blows into the pucuna, eliminating windage. Another type of arrow has bark fibers attached along the shaft, creating a spin on the projectile, showcasing an early understanding of rifling. The arrows used in Peru are only a few inches long and as thin as fine knitting needles. All South American blow-gun arrows are treated with poison. The natives can shoot very accurately with the pucuna at distances of up to 50 or 60 yards.
The blow-gun of the Borneo Dyaks, called sumpitan, is from 89 6 to 7 ft. long and made of ironwood. The bore, of ½ in., is made with a long pointed piece of iron. At the muzzle a small iron hook is affixed, to serve as a sight, as well as a spear-head like a bayonet and for the same purpose. The arrows used with the sumpitan are about 10 in. long, pointed with fish-teeth, and feathered with pith. They are also envenomed with poison.
The blowgun of the Borneo Dyaks, called sumpitan, is 6 to 7 ft. long and made of ironwood. The bore, which is ½ in. wide, is created with a long pointed piece of iron. At the muzzle, there’s a small iron hook attached that acts as a sight, as well as a spearhead like a bayonet for the same purpose. The arrows used with the sumpitan are about 10 in. long, tipped with fish teeth, and feathered with pith. They are also poisoned.
Poisoned arrows are also used by the natives of the Philippine island of Mindanao, whose blow-pipes, from 3 to 4 ft. long and made of bamboo, are often richly ornamented and even jewelled.
Poisoned arrows are also used by the natives of the Philippine island of Mindanao, whose blowpipes, ranging from 3 to 4 feet long and made of bamboo, are often beautifully decorated and even embellished with jewels.
The principle of the blow-gun is, of course, the same as that of the common “pea-shooter.”
The principle of the blowgun is, of course, the same as that of the typical “pea shooter.”
See Sport with Rod and Gun in American Woods and Waters, by A.M. Mayer, vol. ii. (Edinburgh, 1884); Wanderings in South America, &c., by Charles Waterton (London, 1828); The Head Hunters of Borneo, by Carl Bock (London, 1881).
See Sport with Rod and Gun in American Woods and Waters, by A.M. Mayer, vol. ii. (Edinburgh, 1884); Wanderings in South America, etc., by Charles Waterton (London, 1828); The Head Hunters of Borneo, by Carl Bock (London, 1881).
BLOWITZ, HENRI GEORGES STEPHAN ADOLPHE DE (1825-1903), Anglo-French journalist, was born, according to the account given in his memoirs, at his father’s chateau in Bohemia on the 28th of December 1825. At the age of fifteen he left home, and travelled over Europe for some years in company with a young professor of philology, acquiring a thorough knowledge of French, German and Italian and a mixed general education. The finances of his family becoming straitened, young Blowitz was on the point of starting to seek his fortune in America, when he became acquainted in Paris with M. de Falloux, minister of public instruction, who appointed him professor of foreign languages at the Tours Lycée, whence, after some years, he was transferred to the Marseilles Lycée. After marrying in 1859 he resigned his professorship, but remained at Marseilles, devoting himself to literature and politics. In 1869 information which he supplied to a legitimist newspaper at Marseilles with regard to the candidature of M. de Lesseps as deputy for that city led to a demand for his expulsion from France. He was, however, allowed to remain, but had to retire to the country. In 1870 his predictions of the approaching fall of the Empire caused the demand for his expulsion to be renewed. While his case was under discussion the battle of Sedan was fought, and Blowitz effectually ingratiated himself with the authorities by applying for naturalization as a French subject. Once naturalized, he returned to Marseilles, where he was fortunately able to render considerable service to Thiers, who subsequently employed him in collecting information at Versailles, and when this work was finished offered him the French consulship at Riga. Blowitz was on the point of accepting this post when Laurence Oliphant, then Paris correspondent of The Times, for which Blowitz had already done some occasional work, asked him to act as his regular assistant for a time, Frederick Hardman, the other Paris correspondent of The Times, being absent. Blowitz accepted the offer, and when, later on, Oliphant was succeeded by Hardman he remained as assistant correspondent. In 1873 Hardman died, and Blowitz became chief Paris correspondent to The Times. In this capacity he soon became famous in the world of journalism and diplomacy. In 1875 the duc de Decazcs, then French foreign minister, showed Blowitz a confidential despatch from the French ambassador in Berlin (in which the latter warned his government that Germany was contemplating an attack on France), and requested the correspondent to expose the German designs in The Times. The publication of the facts effectually aroused European public opinion, and any such intention was immediately thwarted. Blowitz’s most sensational journalistic feat was achieved in 1878, when his enterprise enabled The Times to publish the whole text of the treaty of Berlin at the actual moment that the treaty was being signed in Germany. In 1877 and again in 1888 Blowitz rendered considerable service to the French government by his exposure of internal designs upon the Republic. He died on the 18th of January 1903.
BLOWITZ, HENRI GEORGES STEPHAN ADOLPHE DE (1825-1903), Anglo-French journalist, was born, according to his memoirs, at his father's château in Bohemia on December 28, 1825. At fifteen, he left home and traveled across Europe for several years with a young professor of philology, gaining a solid understanding of French, German, and Italian, along with a general education. When his family faced financial difficulties, young Blowitz was about to seek his fortune in America when he met M. de Falloux, the minister of public instruction, in Paris. He was appointed as a foreign languages professor at the Tours Lycée and later transferred to the Marseilles Lycée. After marrying in 1859, he resigned his professorship but stayed in Marseilles, focusing on literature and politics. In 1869, information he provided to a legitimist newspaper in Marseilles about M. de Lesseps's candidacy for the city led to calls for his expulsion from France. He was allowed to stay but had to retreat to the countryside. His predictions about the imminent fall of the Empire in 1870 renewed calls for his expulsion. While his case was being discussed, the Battle of Sedan occurred, and Blowitz ingratiated himself with authorities by applying for naturalization as a French citizen. Once naturalized, he returned to Marseilles and was fortunate enough to render significant service to Thiers, who later employed him to gather information in Versailles. After this assignment, he was offered the French consulship in Riga. Just as he was about to accept this position, Laurence Oliphant, then the Paris correspondent for The Times, asked him to be his regular assistant for a while since Frederick Hardman, the other Paris correspondent for The Times, was away. Blowitz accepted, and when Oliphant was succeeded by Hardman, he remained as the assistant correspondent. In 1873, Hardman passed away, and Blowitz became the chief Paris correspondent for The Times. In this role, he quickly gained fame in the journalism and diplomacy world. In 1875, the duc de Decazes, then France's foreign minister, showed Blowitz a confidential dispatch from the French ambassador in Berlin, warning that Germany was considering an attack on France. The correspondent was asked to expose the German plans in The Times. The publication of this information effectively stirred European public opinion, thwarting any such intentions. Blowitz’s most sensational journalistic achievement came in 1878 when his initiative allowed The Times to publish the full text of the Berlin treaty just as it was being signed in Germany. In 1877 and again in 1888, Blowitz provided considerable assistance to the French government by revealing internal plots against the Republic. He died on January 18, 1903.
My Memoirs, by H.S. de Blowitz, was published in 1903.
My Memoirs, by H.S. de Blowitz, was published in 1903.
BLOWPIPE, in the arts and chemistry, a tube for directing a jet of air into a fire or into the flame of a lamp or gas jet, for the purpose of producing a high temperature by accelerating the combustion. The blowpipe has been in common use from the earliest times for soldering metals and working glass, but its introduction into systematic chemical analysis is to be ascribed to A.F. Cronstedt, and not to Anton Swab, as has been maintained (see J. Landauer, Ber. 26, p. 898). The first work on this application of the blowpipe was by G. v. Engeström, and was published in 1770 as an appendix to a treatise on mineralogy. Its application has been variously improved at the hands of T.O. Bergman, J.G. Gahn, J.J. Berzelius, C.F. Plattner and others, but more especially by the two last-named chemists.
BLOWPIPE, in the arts and chemistry, is a tube used to direct a stream of air into a fire or the flame of a lamp or gas jet, with the goal of creating a high temperature by speeding up combustion. The blowpipe has been commonly used since ancient times for soldering metals and working with glass, but its introduction into systematic chemical analysis is credited to A.F. Cronstedt, not Anton Swab, as is often claimed (see J. Landauer, Ber. 26, p. 898). The first work on this use of the blowpipe was by G. v. Engeström, published in 1770 as an appendix to a mineralogy treatise. Its application has been enhanced by T.O. Bergman, J.G. Gahn, J.J. Berzelius, C.F. Plattner, and others, particularly by the latter two chemists.
The simplest and oldest form of blowpipe is a conical brass tube, about 7 in. in length, curved at the small end into a right angle, and terminating in a small round orifice, which is applied to the flame, while the larger end is applied to the mouth. Where the blast has to be kept up for only a few seconds, this instrument is quite serviceable, but in longer chemical operations inconvenience arises from the condensation of moisture exhaled by the lungs in the tube. Hence most blowpipes are now made with a cavity for retaining the moisture. Cronstedt placed a bulb in the centre of his blowpipe. Dr Joseph Black’s instrument consists of a conical tube of tin plate, with a small brass tube, supporting the nozzle, inserted near the wider end, and a mouth-piece at the narrow end.
The simplest and oldest type of blowpipe is a conical brass tube, about 7 inches long, bent at a right angle at the small end, and finishing with a small round opening that is placed in the flame, while the larger end is held in the mouth. This tool works well for short bursts of use, but when longer chemical processes are involved, issues arise due to moisture from the breath condensing in the tube. For this reason, most modern blowpipes are designed with a section to collect the moisture. Cronstedt added a bulb in the middle of his blowpipe. Dr. Joseph Black’s design features a conical tin tube with a small brass tube for the nozzle inserted near the wider end, and a mouthpiece at the narrow end.
The sizes of orifice recommended by Plattner are 0.4 and 0.5 mm. A trumpet mouth-piece is recommended from the support it gives to the cheeks when inflated. The mode of blowing is peculiar, and requires some practice; an uninterrupted blast is kept up by the muscular action of the cheeks, while the ordinary respiration goes on through the nostrils.
The recommended sizes of the orifice by Plattner are 0.4 and 0.5 mm. A trumpet mouthpiece is suggested because it supports the cheeks when they’re puffed out. The way of blowing is unique and takes some practice; a steady stream of air is maintained by the muscle movement of the cheeks while breathing normally happens through the nostrils.
If the flame of a candle or lamp be closely examined, it will be seen to consist of four parts—(a) a deep blue ring at the base, (b) a dark cone in the centre, (c) a luminous portion round this, and (d) an exterior pale blue envelope (see Flame). In blowpipe work only two of these four parts are made use of, viz. the pale envelope, for oxidation, and the luminous portion, for reduction. To obtain a good oxidizing flame, the blowpipe is held with its nozzle inserted in the edge of the flame close over the level of the wick, and blown into gently and evenly. A conical jet is thus produced, consisting of an inner cone, with an outer one commencing near its apex—the former, corresponding to (a) in the free flame, blue and well defined; the latter corresponding to (d), pale blue and vague. The heat is greatest just beyond the point of the inner cone, combustion being there most complete. Oxidation is better effected (if a very high temperature be not required) the farther the substance is from the apex of the inner cone, for the air has thus freer access. To obtain a good reducing flame (in which the combustible matter, very hot, but not yet burned, is disposed to take oxygen from any compound containing it), the nozzle, with smaller orifice, should just touch the flame at a point higher above the wick, and a somewhat weaker current of air should be blown. The flame then appears as a long, narrow, luminous cone, the end being enveloped by a dimly visible portion of flame corresponding to that which surrounds the free flame, while there is also a dark nucleus about the wick. The substance to be reduced is brought into the luminous portion, where the reducing power is strongest.
If you take a close look at the flame of a candle or lamp, you'll notice it has four parts—(a) a deep blue ring at the base, (b) a dark cone in the center, (c) a glowing section around this, and (d) an outer pale blue layer (see Flame). In blowpipe work, only two of these four parts are used: the pale envelope for oxidation, and the glowing section for reduction. To get a good oxidizing flame, hold the blowpipe with its nozzle inserted at the edge of the flame just above the wick and blow gently and steadily. This creates a conical jet, made up of an inner cone that corresponds to (a) in the free flame, which is blue and well-defined, and an outer cone that corresponds to (d), which is pale blue and less defined. The heat is highest just beyond the tip of the inner cone, where combustion is most complete. Oxidation is more effective (if a very high temperature isn't needed) the farther the substance is from the tip of the inner cone, as this allows for better air access. To achieve a good reducing flame (where the hot, unburned combustible matter tends to take oxygen from any compound that contains it), the nozzle with a smaller opening should just touch the flame at a point higher above the wick, and a slightly weaker air current should be blown. The flame then appears as a long, narrow, glowing cone, with the tip surrounded by a faintly visible portion of flame similar to that around the free flame, while there's also a dark core around the wick. The substance that needs reducing is placed in the glowing portion, where the reducing power is strongest.
Various materials are used as supports for substances in the blowpipe flame; the principal are charcoal, platinum and glass or porcelain. Charcoal is valuable for its infusibility and low conductivity for heat (allowing substances to be strongly heated upon it), and for its powerful reducing properties; so that it is chiefly employed in testing the fusibility of minerals and in reduction. The best kind of charcoal is that of close-grained pine or alder; it is cut in short prisms, having a flat smooth surface at right angles to the rings of growth. In this a shallow hole is made for receiving the substance to be held in the flame. Gas-carbon is sometimes used, since it is more permanent in the flame than wood charcoal. Platinum is employed in oxidizing processes, and in the fusion of substances with fluxes; also in observing the colouring effect of substances on the blowpipe flame (which effect is apt to be somewhat masked by charcoal). Most commonly it is used in the form of wire, with a small bend or loop at the end.
Various materials are used as supports for substances in the blowpipe flame; the main ones are charcoal, platinum, and glass or porcelain. Charcoal is valued for its resistance to melting and low heat conductivity (allowing substances to be heated intensely on it), and for its strong reducing properties. Therefore, it is mainly used to test the melting points of minerals and for reduction processes. The best type of charcoal is made from close-grained pine or alder, cut into short prisms with a flat, smooth surface that’s perpendicular to the growth rings. A shallow hole is made in this to hold the substance being heated. Gas-carbon is sometimes used too, as it lasts longer in the flame than wood charcoal. Platinum is used in oxidizing processes and for fusing substances with fluxes, as well as in observing how substances change the color of the blowpipe flame (an effect that can be somewhat hidden by charcoal). It's most commonly used in the form of wire, with a small bend or loop at the end.
The mouth blowpipe is unsuitable for the production of a large flame, and cannot be used for any lengthy operations; hence recourse must be made to types in which the air-blast is occasioned by mechanical means. The laboratory form in common use consists of a bellows worked by either hand or foot, and a special type of gas burner formed of two concentric tubes, one conveying the blast, the other the gas; the supply of air and gas being regulated by stopcocks. The hot blast blowpipe of T. Fletcher, in which the blast is heated by passing through a copper coil heated by a separate burner, is only of service when a pointed flame of a fairly high temperature is required. Blowpipes in which oxygen is used as the blast have been manufactured by Fletcher, Russell & Co., and have proved of great service in conducting fusions which require a temperature above that yielded by the air-blowpipe.
The mouth blowpipe isn't suitable for creating a large flame and can't be used for extended tasks; therefore, we have to rely on types that use mechanical means to generate the air blast. The commonly used laboratory version features a bellows that can be operated by hand or foot, along with a special gas burner made of two concentric tubes—one for the air blast and the other for the gas. The flow of air and gas is controlled by stopcocks. The hot blast blowpipe by T. Fletcher, which heats the blast by passing it through a copper coil warmed by a separate burner, is only useful when a pointed flame at a relatively high temperature is needed. Blowpipes that use oxygen for the blast have been produced by Fletcher, Russell & Co., and they have been incredibly helpful for carrying out fusions that require a temperature higher than what the air blowpipe can provide.
BLÜCHER, GEBHARD LEBERECHT VON (1742-1819), Prussian general field marshal, prince of Wahlstadt in Silesia, was born at Rostock on the 16th of December 1742. In his fourteenth year he entered the service of Sweden, and in the Pomeranian campaign of 1760 he was taken prisoner by the Prussians. He was persuaded by his captors to enter the Prussian service. He took part in the later battles of the Seven Years’ War, and as a hussar officer gained much experience of light cavalry work. In peace, however, his ardent spirit led him into excesses of all kinds, and being passed over for promotion he sent in his resignation, to which Frederick replied, “Captain Blücher can take himself to the devil” (1773). He now settled down to farming, and in fifteen years he had acquired an honourable independence. But he was unable to return to the army until after the death of Frederick the Great. He was then reinstated as major in his old regiment, the Red Hussars. He took part in the expedition to Holland in 1787, and in the following year became lieutenant-colonel. In 1789 he received the order pour le mérite, and in 1794 he became colonel of the Red Hussars. In 1793 and 1794 he distinguished himself in cavalry actions against the French, and for his success at Kirrweiler he was made a major-general. In 1801 he was promoted lieutenant-general.
BLÜCHER, GEBHARD LEBERECHT VON (1742-1819), Prussian general field marshal, prince of Wahlstadt in Silesia, was born in Rostock on December 16, 1742. At the age of fourteen, he joined the Swedish military, and during the Pomeranian campaign of 1760, he was captured by the Prussians. His captors convinced him to join the Prussian army. He participated in the later battles of the Seven Years’ War and, as a hussar officer, gained valuable experience in light cavalry operations. However, in peacetime, his passionate nature led him to excesses, and after being overlooked for promotion, he submitted his resignation, which Frederick responded to with, “Captain Blücher can go to hell” (1773). He then transitioned to farming, and within fifteen years, he achieved a respectable independence. He couldn’t return to the military until after Frederick the Great's death. Once reinstated as a major in his old regiment, the Red Hussars, he participated in the expedition to Holland in 1787 and became a lieutenant-colonel the following year. In 1789, he received the order pour le mérite, and in 1794, he became colonel of the Red Hussars. In 1793 and 1794, he earned distinction in cavalry engagements against the French, and for his achievements at Kirrweiler, he was promoted to major-general. In 1801, he was elevated to the rank of lieutenant-general.
He was one of the leaders of the war party in Prussia in 1805-1806, and served as a cavalry general in the disastrous campaign of the latter year. At Auerstädt Blücher repeatedly charged at the head of the Prussian cavalry, but without success. In the retreat of the broken armies he commanded the rearguard of Prince Hohenlohe’s corps, and upon the capitulation of the main body of Prenzlau he carried off a remnant of the Prussian army to the northward, and in the neighbourhood of Lübeck he fought a series of combats, which, however, ended in his being forced to surrender at Ratkau (November 7, 1806). His adversaries testified in his capitulation that it was caused by “want of provisions and ammunition.” He was soon exchanged for General Victor, and was actively employed in Pomerania, at Berlin, and at Königsberg until the conclusion of the war. After the war, Blücher was looked upon as the natural leader of the patriot party, with which he was in close touch during the period of Napoleonic domination. His hopes of an alliance with Austria in the war of 1809 were disappointed. In this year he was made general of cavalry. In 1812 he expressed himself so openly on the alliance of Russia with France that he was recalled from his military governorship of Pomerania and virtually banished from the court.
He was one of the leaders of the war faction in Prussia in 1805-1806 and served as a cavalry general in the disastrous campaign of that year. At Auerstädt, Blücher repeatedly charged at the head of the Prussian cavalry, but with no success. During the retreat of the defeated armies, he commanded the rearguard of Prince Hohenlohe’s corps, and after the surrender of the main body at Prenzlau, he led a remnant of the Prussian army northward. In the vicinity of Lübeck, he fought several battles, which ultimately ended in his surrender at Ratkau (November 7, 1806). His opponents noted in his surrender that it was due to “lack of supplies and ammunition.” He was soon exchanged for General Victor and was actively engaged in Pomerania, at Berlin, and at Königsberg until the war ended. After the war, Blücher was seen as the natural leader of the patriot party, with which he maintained close connections during the period of Napoleonic rule. His hopes for an alliance with Austria in the war of 1809 were unfulfilled. That year, he was appointed general of cavalry. In 1812, he spoke so openly about the alliance between Russia and France that he was recalled from his military governorship of Pomerania and effectively banished from the court.
When at last the Napoleonic domination was ended by the outbreak of the War of Liberation in 1813, Blücher of course was at once placed in high command, and he was present at Lützen and Bautzen. During the armistice he worked at the organization of the Prussian forces, and when the war was resumed Blücher became commander-in-chief of the Army of Silesia, with Gneisenau and Müffling as his principal staff officers, and 40,000 Prussians and 50,000 Russians under his control. The autumn campaign of 1813 will be found described in the article Napoleonic Campaigns, and it will here be sufficient to say that the most conspicuous military quality displayed by Blücher was his unrelenting energy. The irresolution and divergence of interests usual in allied armies found in him a restless opponent, and the knowledge that if he could not induce others to co-operate he was prepared to attempt the task in hand by himself often caused other generals to follow his lead. He defeated Marshal Macdonald at the Katzbach, and by his victory over Marmont at Möckern led the way to the decisive overthrow of Napoleon at Leipzig, which place was stormed by Blücher’s own army on the evening of the last day of the battle. On the day of Mockern (October 16, 1813) Blücher was made a general field marshal, and after the victory he pursued the routed French with his accustomed energy. In the winter of 1813-1814 Blücher, with his chief staff officers, was mainly instrumental in inducing the allied sovereigns to carry the war into France itself. The combat of Brienne and the battle of La Rothière were the chief incidents of the first stage of the celebrated campaign of 1814, and they were quickly followed by the victories of Napoleon over Blücher at Champaubert, Vauxchamps and Montmirail. But the courage of the Prussian leader was undiminished, and his great victory of Laon (March 9 to 10) practically decided the fate of the campaign. After this Blücher infused some of his own energy into the operations of Prince Schwarzenberg’s Army of Bohemia, and at last this army and the Army of Silesia marched in one body direct upon Paris. The victory of Montmartre, the entry of the allies into the French capital, and the overthrow of the First Empire were the direct consequences. Blücher was disposed to make a severe retaliation upon Paris for the calamities that Prussia had suffered from the armies of France had not the allied commanders intervened to prevent it. Blowing up the bridge of Jena was said to be one of his contemplated acts. On the 3rd of June 1814 he was made prince of Wahlstadt (in Silesia on the Katzbach battlefield), and soon afterwards he paid a visit to England, being received everywhere with the greatest enthusiasm.
When the Napoleonic rule finally ended with the start of the War of Liberation in 1813, Blücher was immediately appointed to a high command and participated in the battles of Lützen and Bautzen. During the armistice, he focused on organizing the Prussian forces, and when the fighting resumed, he became the commander-in-chief of the Army of Silesia, with Gneisenau and Müffling as his main staff officers, in charge of 40,000 Prussians and 50,000 Russians. The autumn campaign of 1813 is detailed in the article Napoleonic Campaigns, but it's important to note that Blücher's most notable military trait was his relentless energy. He was a restless force against the usual indecision and conflicting interests found in allied armies, and the fact that he was willing to take on tasks alone if he couldn't get others to cooperate often motivated other generals to follow his example. He defeated Marshal Macdonald at the Katzbach and, with his victory over Marmont at Möckern, paved the way for Napoleon's decisive defeat at Leipzig, which Blücher's army stormed on the final evening of the battle. On the day of Möckern (October 16, 1813), he was promoted to general field marshal, and after the victory, he energetically pursued the retreating French. In the winter of 1813-1814, Blücher and his chief staff officers played a key role in persuading the allied rulers to take the war into France itself. The combat at Brienne and the battle of La Rothière were the main events of the first phase of the famous 1814 campaign, quickly followed by Napoleon's victories over Blücher at Champaubert, Vauxchamps, and Montmirail. However, Blücher's courage remained unshaken, and his significant victory at Laon (March 9 to 10) nearly determined the campaign's outcome. After this, he injected some of his own drive into the operations of Prince Schwarzenberg’s Army of Bohemia, and eventually, this army and the Army of Silesia advanced together straight to Paris. The victory at Montmartre, the entry of the allies into the French capital, and the fall of the First Empire were direct results. Blücher was inclined to retaliate harshly against Paris for the suffering Prussia endured at the hands of the French armies, only prevented by the intervention of the allied commanders. It was rumored that he planned to blow up the bridge at Jena. On June 3, 1814, he was named prince of Wahlstadt (in Silesia on the Katzbach battlefield), and shortly after, he visited England, where he was greeted with great enthusiasm.
After the peace he retired to Silesia, but the return of Napoleon soon called him to further service. He was put in command of the Army of the Lower Rhine with General Gneisenau as his chief of staff (see Waterloo Campaign). In the campaign of 1815 the Prussians sustained a very severe defeat at the outset at Ligny (June 16), in the course of which the old field marshal was ridden over by cavalry charges, his life being saved only by the devotion of his aide-de-camp, Count Nostitz. He was unable to resume command for some hours, and Gneisenau drew off the defeated army. The relations of the Prussian and the English headquarters were at this time very complicated, and it is uncertain whether Blücher himself was responsible for the daring resolution to march to Wellington’s assistance. This was in fact done, and after an incredibly severe march Blücher’s army intervened with decisive and crushing effect in the battle of Waterloo. The great victory was converted into a success absolutely decisive of the war by the relentless pursuit of the Prussians, and the allies re-entered Paris on the 7th of July. Prince Blücher remained in the French capital for some months, but his age and infirmities compelled him to retire to his Silesian residence at Krieblowitz, where he died on the 12th of September 1819, aged seventy-seven. He retained to the end of his life that wildness of character and proneness to excesses which had caused his dismissal from the army in his youth, but however they may be regarded, these faults sprang always from the ardent and vivid temperament which made Blücher a dashing leader of horse. The qualities which made him a great general were his patriotism and the hatred of French domination which inspired every success of the War of Liberation. He was twice married, and had, by his first marriage, two sons and a daughter. Statues were erected to his memory at Berlin, Breslau and Rostock.
After the peace, he retired to Silesia, but the return of Napoleon quickly drew him back into service. He was put in charge of the Army of the Lower Rhine with General Gneisenau as his chief of staff (see Waterloo Campaign). In the 1815 campaign, the Prussians faced a serious defeat at the start at Ligny (June 16), during which the old field marshal was trampled by cavalry charges, saved only by the bravery of his aide-de-camp, Count Nostitz. He was unable to take command again for several hours, and Gneisenau led the defeated army away. At this time, the relationship between the Prussian and English headquarters was very complicated, and it's unclear if Blücher himself was responsible for the bold decision to march to Wellington’s aid. This indeed happened, and after an incredibly tough march, Blücher’s army intervened decisively in the Battle of Waterloo. The significant victory turned into a decisive success of the war due to the relentless pursuit by the Prussians, and the allies re-entered Paris on July 7. Prince Blücher stayed in the French capital for several months, but his age and health forced him to retire to his Silesian home in Krieblowitz, where he died on September 12, 1819, at the age of seventy-seven. Until the end of his life, he maintained the wild character and tendency for excess that had led to his dismissal from the army in his youth, but these faults always came from the passionate and vibrant temperament that made Blücher an exciting cavalry leader. The qualities that made him a great general were his patriotism and the hatred of French domination that fueled every success during the War of Liberation. He was married twice and had two sons and a daughter from his first marriage. Statues were erected in his honor in Berlin, Breslau, and Rostock.
Of the various lives of Prince Blücher, that by Varnhagen von Ense (1827) is the most important. His war diaries of 1793-1794, together with a memoir (written in 1805) on the subject of a national army, were edited by Golz and Ribbentrop (Campagne Journal 1793-4 von Gl. Lt. v. Blücher).
Of the different biographies of Prince Blücher, the one by Varnhagen von Ense (1827) is the most significant. His war diaries from 1793-1794, along with a memoir (written in 1805) about a national army, were edited by Golz and Ribbentrop (Campagne Journal 1793-4 von Gl. Lt. v. Blücher).
BLUE (common in different forms to most European languages), the name of a colour, used in many colloquial 91 phrases. From the fact of various parties, political and other, having adopted the colour blue as their badge, various classes of people have come to be known as “blue” or “blues”; thus “true blue” meant originally a staunch Presbyterian, the Covenanters having adopted blue as their colour as opposed to red, the royal colour; similarly, in the navy, there was in the 18th century a “Blue Squadron,” Nelson being at one time “Rear-Admiral of the Blue”; again, in 1690, the Royal Horse Guards were called the “Blues” from their blue uniforms, or, from their leader, the earl of Oxford, the “Oxford Blues”; also, from the blue ribbon worn by the knights of the Garter comes the use of the phrase as the highest mark of distinction that can be worn, especially applied on the turf to the winning of the Derby. The “blue Peter” is a rectangular blue flag, with a white square in the centre, hoisted at the top of the foremast as a signal that a vessel is about to leave port. At Oxford and Cambridge a man who represents his university in certain athletic sports is called a “blue” from the “colours” he is then entitled to wear, dark blue for Oxford and light blue for Cambridge.
BLUE (common in different forms to most European languages), the name of a color, used in many casual 91 phrases. Because various groups, both political and otherwise, have adopted the color blue as their symbol, different classes of people have come to be known as “blue” or “blues.” For example, “true blue” originally referred to a staunch Presbyterian, since the Covenanters chose blue as their color in contrast to red, the royal color. Similarly, in the navy during the 18th century, there was a “Blue Squadron,” with Nelson once serving as “Rear-Admiral of the Blue.” In 1690, the Royal Horse Guards were called the “Blues” because of their blue uniforms, or from their leader, the Earl of Oxford, referred to as the “Oxford Blues.” Furthermore, the blue ribbon worn by the knights of the Garter symbolizes the highest mark of distinction, especially applied in horse racing to winning the Derby. The “blue Peter” is a rectangular blue flag with a white square in the center, raised at the top of the foremast as a signal that a ship is about to depart from port. At Oxford and Cambridge, a person who represents their university in certain athletic sports is called a “blue” based on the “colors” they are authorized to wear, dark blue for Oxford and light blue for Cambridge.
BLUEBEARD, the monster of Charles Perrault’s tale of Barbe Bleue, who murdered his wives and hid their bodies in a locked room. Perrault’s tale was first printed in his Histoires et contes du temps passé (1697). The essentials of the story—Bluebeard’s prohibition to his wife to open a certain door during his absence, her disobedience, her discovery of a gruesome secret, and her timely rescue from death—are to be found in other folklore stories, none of which, however, has attained the fame of Bluebeard. A close parallel exists in an Esthonian legend of a husband who had already killed eleven wives, and was prevented from killing the twelfth, who had opened a secret room, by a gooseherd, the friend of her childhood. In “The Feather Bird” of Grimm’s Hausmärchen, three sisters are the victims, the third being rescued by her brothers. Bluebeard, though Perrault does not state the number of his crimes, is generally credited with the murder of seven wives. His history belongs to the common stock of folklore, and has even been ingeniously fitted with a mythical interpretation. In France the Bluebeard legend has its local habitation in Brittany, but whether the existing traditions connecting him with Gilles de Rais (q.v.) or Comorre the Cursed, a Breton chief of the 6th century, were anterior to Perrault’s time, we have no means of determining. The identification of Bluebeard with Gilles de Rais, the bête d’extermination of Michelet’s forcible language, persists locally in the neighbourhood of the various castles of the baron, especially at Machecoul and Tiffauges, the chief scenes of his infamous crimes. Gilles de Rais, however, had only one wife, who survived him, and his victims were in the majority of cases young boys. The traditional connexion may arise simply from the not improbable association of two monstrous tales. The less widespread identification of Bluebeard with Comorre is supported by a series of frescoes dating only a few years later than the publication of Perrault’s story, in a chapel at St Nicolas de Bieuzy dedicated to St Tryphine, in which the tale of Bluebeard is depicted as the story of the saint, who in history was the wife of Comorre. Comorre or Conomor had his original headquarters at Carhaix, in Finistère. He extended his authority by marriage with the widow of Iona, chief of Domnonia, and attempted the life of his stepson Judwal, who fled to the Frankish court. About 547 or 548 he obtained in marriage, through the intercession of St Gildas, Tryphine, daughter of Weroc, count of Vannes. The pair lived in peace at Castel Finans for some time, but Comorre, disappointed in his ambitions in the Vannetais, presently threatened Tryphine. She took flight, but her husband found her hiding in a wood, when he gave her a wound on the skull and left her for dead. She was tended and restored to health by St Gildas, and after the birth of her son retired to a convent of her own foundation. Eventually Comorre was defeated and slain by Judwal. In legend St Tryphine was decapitated and miraculously restored to life by Gildas. Alain Bouchard (Grandes croniques, Nantes, 1531) asserts that Comorre had already put several wives to death before he married Tryphine. In the Légendes bretonnes of the count d’Amezeuil the church legend becomes a charming fairy tale.
BLUEBEARD, the villain from Charles Perrault’s story Barbe Bleue, who killed his wives and hid their bodies in a locked room. Perrault’s tale was first published in his Histoires et contes du weather passé (1697). The main elements of the story—Bluebeard’s warning to his wife not to open a specific door while he’s away, her disobedience, her discovery of a horrifying secret, and her rescue from death just in time—can be found in various folklore tales, but none have achieved the same fame as Bluebeard. A similar story exists in an Estonian legend about a husband who had already killed eleven wives, and was stopped from killing the twelfth, who opened a secret room, by a gooseherd, her childhood friend. In "The Feather Bird" from Grimm’s Hausmärchen, three sisters are victims, with the third being rescued by her brothers. Bluebeard, although Perrault doesn’t specify how many crimes he committed, is commonly thought to have murdered seven wives. His story is part of the shared folklore, and has even been cleverly interpreted mythically. In France, the Bluebeard legend is particularly associated with Brittany, but it’s unclear whether the existing traditions linking him with Gilles de Rais (q.v) or Comorre the Cursed, a Breton chief from the 6th century, predate Perrault’s time. The connection of Bluebeard to Gilles de Rais, the bête d’extermination as Michelet dramatically put it, remains locally in the area around the various castles of the baron, especially at Machecoul and Tiffauges, where his infamous crimes took place. Gilles de Rais, however, had only one wife who outlived him, and his victims were mostly young boys. The traditional link may simply stem from the likely association of two monstrous tales. The less common connection of Bluebeard to Comorre is supported by a series of frescoes created only a few years after the publication of Perrault’s story, in a chapel at St Nicolas de Bieuzy dedicated to St Tryphine, where the tale of Bluebeard is depicted as the story of the saint, who in history was the wife of Comorre. Comorre or Conomor originally operated from Carhaix, in Finistère. He expanded his power by marrying the widow of Iona, chief of Domnonia, and attempted to kill his stepson Judwal, who fled to the Frankish court. Around 547 or 548, with the help of St Gildas, he married Tryphine, daughter of Weroc, count of Vannes. The couple lived peacefully at Castel Finans for some time, but Comorre, frustrated by his ambitions in the Vannetais, soon threatened Tryphine. She fled, but her husband found her hiding in a forest, where he struck her on the head and left her for dead. St Gildas took care of her, helping her recover, and after the birth of her son, she retired to a convent she founded. Eventually, Comorre was defeated and killed by Judwal. In legend, St Tryphine was beheaded and miraculously brought back to life by Gildas. Alain Bouchard (Grandes croniques, Nantes, 1531) claims that Comorre had already killed several wives before marrying Tryphine. In the Légendes bretonnes by the count d’Amezeuil, the church legend transforms into a delightful fairy tale.
See also E.A. Vizetclly, Bluebeard (1902); E. Sidney Hartland, “The Forbidden Chamber,” in Folklore, vol. iii. (1885); and the editions of the Contes of Charles Perrault (q.v.). Cf. A. France, Les Sept Femmes de Barbe Bleue (1909).
See also E.A. Vizetclly, Bluebeard (1902); E. Sidney Hartland, “The Forbidden Chamber,” in Folklore, vol. iii. (1885); and the editions of the Contes of Charles Perrault (q.v.). Cf. A. France, Les Sept Femmes de Barbe Bleue (1909).
BLUE-BOOK, the general name given to the reports and other documents printed by order of the parliament of the United Kingdom, so called from their being usually covered with blue paper, though some are bound in drab and others have white covers. The printing of its proceedings was first adopted by the House of Commons in 1681, and in 1836 was commenced the practice of selling parliamentary papers to the public. All notices of questions, resolutions, votes and proceedings in both Houses of Parliament are issued each day during the session; other publications include the various papers issued by the different government departments, the reports of committees and commissions of inquiry, public bills, as well as returns, correspondence, &c., specially ordered to be printed by either house. The papers of each session are so arranged as to admit of being bound up in regular order, and are well indexed. The terms upon which blue-books, single papers, &c., are issued to the general public are one halfpenny per sheet of four pages, but for an annual subscription of £20 all the parliamentary publications of the year may be obtained; but subscriptions can be arranged so that almost any particular class of publication can be obtained—for example, the daily votes and proceedings can be obtained for an annual subscription of £3, the House of Lords papers for £10, or the House of Commons papers for £15. Any publication can also be purchased separately.
BLUE-BOOK, is the general name for the reports and other documents printed by order of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. They are called "blue books" because they are usually covered with blue paper, although some are bound in drab and others have white covers. The House of Commons first started printing its proceedings in 1681, and by 1836, the practice of selling parliamentary papers to the public began. Each day during the session, all notices of questions, resolutions, votes, and proceedings in both Houses of Parliament are issued; other publications include various papers from different government departments, reports from committees and commissions of inquiry, public bills, as well as returns, correspondence, etc., specifically ordered to be printed by either house. The papers from each session are arranged to be bound in regular order, and they are well indexed. The cost for blue books, single papers, etc., is half a penny per sheet of four pages, but for an annual subscription of £20, you can get all parliamentary publications for the year; subscriptions can also be set up to cover almost any specific type of publication. For example, the daily votes and proceedings can be obtained with an annual subscription of £3, the House of Lords papers for £10, or the House of Commons papers for £15. Any publication can also be purchased individually.
Most foreign countries have a distinctive colour for the binding of their official publications. That of the United Slates varies, but foreign diplomatic correspondence is bound in red. The United States government publications are not only on sale (as a rule) but are widely supplied gratis, with the result that important publications soon get out of print, and it is difficult to obtain access to many valuable reports or other information, except at a public library. German official publications are bound in white; French, in yellow; Austrian, in red; Portuguese, in white; Italian, in green; Spanish, in red; Mexican, in green; Japanese, in grey; Chinese, in yellow.
Most foreign countries have a specific color for the binding of their official publications. The United States has a mix, but foreign diplomatic correspondence is bound in red. U.S. government publications are usually available for purchase and are often provided for free, which leads to important publications going out of print quickly and makes it hard to access many valuable reports or other information, except through a public library. German official publications are bound in white; French ones in yellow; Austrian in red; Portuguese in white; Italian in green; Spanish in red; Mexican in green; Japanese in gray; and Chinese in yellow.
BLUESTOCKING, a derisive name for a literary woman. The term originated in or about 1750, when Mrs Elizabeth Montagu (q.v.) made a determined effort to introduce into society a healthier and more intellectual tone, by holding assemblies at which literary conversation and discussions were to take the place of cards and gossip. Most of those attending were conspicuous by the plainness of their dress, and a Mr Benjamin Stillingfleet specially caused comment by always wearing blue or worsted stockings instead of the usual black silk. It was in special reference to him that Mrs Montagu’s friends were called the Bluestocking Society or Club, and the women frequenting her house in Hill Street came to be known as the “Bluestocking Ladies” or simply “bluestockings.” As an alternative explanation, the origin of the name is attributed to Mrs Montagu’s deliberate adoption of blue stockings (in which fashion she was followed by all her women friends) as the badge of the society she wished to form. She is said to have obtained the idea from Paris, where in the 17th century there was a revival of a social reunion in 1590 on the lines of that formed in 1400 at Venice, the ladies and men of which wore blue stockings. The term had been applied in England as early as 1653 to the Little Parliament, in allusion to the puritanically plain and coarse dress of the members.
BLUESTOCKING, a mocking term for a woman of letters. The term began around 1750 when Mrs. Elizabeth Montagu (q.v.) made a strong effort to bring a more intellectual and healthier vibe to society by hosting gatherings where literary discussions and conversations replaced card games and gossip. Most attendees were noticeable for their simple clothing, and a Mr. Benjamin Stillingfleet particularly drew attention by always wearing blue or worsted stockings instead of the typical black silk. It was specifically in reference to him that Mrs. Montagu’s associates were called the Bluestocking Society or Club, and the women who frequented her home on Hill Street became known as the “Bluestocking Ladies” or simply “bluestockings.” Another explanation for the name’s origin is that Mrs. Montagu purposefully adopted blue stockings (a trend her female friends followed) as a symbol of the society she aimed to establish. It’s said she got the idea from Paris, where in the 17th century there was a revival of a social gathering from 1590 patterned after one formed in 1400 in Venice, where both ladies and men wore blue stockings. The term was used in England as early as 1653 to refer to the Little Parliament, in reference to the puritanically plain and coarse attire of its members.
BLUFF (a word of uncertain origin; possibly connected with an obsolete Dutch word, blaf, broad), an adjective used of a ship, meaning broad and nearly vertical in the bows; similarly, of a cliff or shore, presenting a bold and nearly perpendicular front; of a person, good-natured and frank, with a rough or abrupt manner. Another word “bluff,” perhaps connected with German verblüffen, to baffle, meant originally a horse’s blinker, the corresponding verb meaning to blindfold: it survives 92 as a term in such games as poker, where “to bluff” means to bet heavily on a hand so as to make an opponent believe it to be stronger than it is; hence such phrases as “the game of bluff,” “a policy of bluff.”
BLUFF (a word with an unclear origin; possibly linked to an old Dutch word, blaf, meaning broad), is an adjective used to describe a ship that is wide and almost vertical at the front; similarly, it can refer to a cliff or shore that has a bold and nearly straight drop; for a person, it means being good-natured and straightforward, with a rough or blunt demeanor. Another word "bluff," which may be related to the German verblüffen, meaning to confuse, originally referred to a horse’s blinker, with the related verb meaning to blindfold: it is still used 92 in games like poker, where “to bluff” means to bet heavily on a hand to make an opponent think it's stronger than it actually is; hence phrases like “the game of bluff,” “a policy of bluff.”
BLUM, ROBERT FREDERICK (1857-1903), American artist, was born in Cincinnati, Ohio, on the 9th of July 1857. He was employed for a time in a lithographic shop, and studied at the McMicken Art School of Design in Cincinnati, and at the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts in Philadelphia, but he was practically self-taught, and early showed great and original talent. He settled in New York in 1879, and his first published sketches—of Japanese jugglers—appeared in St Nicholas. His most important work is a large frieze in the Mendelssohn Music Hall, New York, “Music and the Dance” (1895). His pen-and-ink work for the Century magazine attracted wide attention, as did his illustrations for Sir Edwin Arnold’s Japonica. In the country and art of Japan he had been interested for many years. “A Daughter of Japan,” drawn by Blum and W.J. Baer, was the cover of Scribner’s Magazine for May 1893, and was one of the earliest pieces of colour-printing for an American magazine. In Scribner’s for 1893 appeared also his “Artist’s Letters from Japan.” He was an admirer of Fortuny, whose methods somewhat influenced his work. Blum’s Venetian pictures, such as “A Bright Day at Venice” (1882), had lively charm and beauty. He died on the 8th of June 1903 in New York City. He was a member of the National Academy of Design, being elected after his exhibition in 1892 of “The Ameya”; and was president of the Painters in Pastel. Although an excellent draughtsman and etcher, it was as a colourist that he chiefly excelled.
BLUM, ROBERT F. (1857-1903), American artist, was born in Cincinnati, Ohio, on July 9, 1857. He worked for a time in a lithography shop and studied at the McMicken Art School of Design in Cincinnati, as well as at the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts in Philadelphia, but he was mostly self-taught and quickly demonstrated remarkable and original talent. He moved to New York in 1879, and his first published sketches—featuring Japanese jugglers—appeared in St Nicholas. His most significant work is a large frieze titled “Music and the Dance” (1895) located in the Mendelssohn Music Hall, New York. His pen-and-ink illustrations for the Century magazine gained considerable attention, as did his artwork for Sir Edwin Arnold’s Japonica. He had been interested in Japan's culture and art for many years. “A Daughter of Japan,” illustrated by Blum and W.J. Baer, graced the cover of Scribner’s Magazine in May 1893 and was one of the first pieces of color printing in an American magazine. His piece “Artist’s Letters from Japan” also appeared in Scribner’s in 1893. He admired Fortuny, whose techniques somewhat influenced his work. Blum’s Venetian paintings, such as “A Bright Day at Venice” (1882), showcased vibrant charm and beauty. He passed away on June 8, 1903, in New York City. He was a member of the National Academy of Design, having been elected after his exhibition of “The Ameya” in 1892, and served as president of the Painters in Pastel. Though he was an excellent draftsman and etcher, he primarily excelled as a colorist.
BLUMENBACH, JOHANN FRIEDRICH (1752-1840), German physiologist and anthropologist, was born at Gotha on the 11th of May 1752. After studying medicine at Jena, he graduated doctor at Göttingen in 1775, and was appointed extraordinary professor of medicine in 1776 and ordinary professor in 1778. He died at Göttingen on the 22nd of January 1840. He was the author of Institutiones Physiologicae (1787), and of a Handbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie (1804), both of which were very popular and went through many editions, but he is best known for his work in connexion with anthropology, of which science he has been justly called the founder. He was the first to show the value of comparative anatomy in the study of man’s history, and his craniometrical researches justified his division of the human race into several great varieties or families, of which he enumerated five—the Caucasian or white race, the Mongolian or yellow, the Malayan or brown race, the Negro or black race, and the American or red race. This classification has been very generally received, and most later schemes have been modifications of it. His most important anthropological work was his description of sixty human crania published originally in fasciculi under the title Collectionis suae craniorum diversarum gentium illustratae decades (Göttingen, 1790-1828).
BLUMENBACH, JOHANN FRIEDRICH (1752-1840), a German physiologist and anthropologist, was born in Gotha on May 11, 1752. After studying medicine at Jena, he graduated as a doctor at Göttingen in 1775 and was appointed as an extraordinary professor of medicine in 1776 and an ordinary professor in 1778. He died in Göttingen on January 22, 1840. He authored Institutiones Physiologicae (1787) and Handbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie (1804), both of which were quite popular and went through many editions, but he is best known for his contributions to anthropology, a field in which he is rightly considered a founder. He was the first to highlight the importance of comparative anatomy in understanding human history, and his research on cranial measurements justified his classification of the human race into several significant groups or families, which he identified as five: the Caucasian or white race, the Mongolian or yellow race, the Malayan or brown race, the Negro or black race, and the American or red race. This classification has been widely accepted, and most later models have modified it. His most significant anthropological work was his description of sixty human skulls originally published in fasciculi under the title Collectionis suae craniorum diversarum gentium illustratae decades (Göttingen, 1790-1828).
BLUMENTHAL, LEONHARD, Count von (1810-1900), Prussian field marshal, son of Captain Ludwig von Blumenthal (killed in 1813 at the battle of Dennewitz), was born at Schwedt-on-Oder on the 30th of July 1810. Educated at the military schools of Culm and Berlin, he entered the Guards as 2nd lieutenant in 1827. After serving in the Rhine provinces, he joined the topographical division of the general staff in 1846. As lieutenant of the 31st foot he took part in 1848 in the suppression of the Berlin riots, and in 1849 was promoted captain on the general staff. The same year he served on the staff of General von Bonin in the Schleswig-Holstein campaign, and so distinguished himself, particularly at Fredericia, that he was appointed chief of the staff of the Schleswig-Holstein army. In 1850 he was general staff officer of the mobile division under von Tietzen in Hesse-Cassel. He was sent on a mission to England in that year (4th class of Red Eagle), and on several subsequent occasions. Having attained the rank of lieutenant-colonel, he was appointed personal adjutant to Prince Frederick Charles in 1859. In 1860 he became colonel of the 31st, and later of the 71st, regiment. He was chief of the staff of the III. army corps when, on the outbreak of the Danish War of 1864, he was nominated chief of the general staff of the army against Denmark, and displayed so much ability, particularly at Düppel and the passage to Alsen island, that he was promoted major-general and given the order pour le mérite. In the war of 1866 Blumenthal occupied the post of chief of the general staff to the crown prince of Prussia, commanding the 2nd army. It was upon this army that the brunt of the fighting fell, and at Königgrätz it decided the fortunes of the day. Blumenthal’s own part in these battles and in the campaign generally was most conspicuous. On the field of Königgrätz the crown prince said to his chief of staff, “I know to whom I owe the conduct of my army,” and Blumenthal soon received promotion to lieutenant-general and the oak-leaf of the order pour le mérite. He was also made a knight of the Hohenzollern Order. From 1866 to 1870 he commanded the 14th division at Düsseldorf. In the Franco-German War of 1870-71 he was chief of staff of the 3rd army under the crown prince. Blumenthal’s soldierly qualities and talent were never more conspicuous than in the critical days preceding the battle of Sedan, and his services in the war have been considered as scarcely less valuable and important than those of Moltke himself. In 1871 Blumenthal represented Germany at the British manoeuvres at Chobham, and was given the command of the IV. army corps at Magdeburg. In 1873 he became a general of infantry, and ten years later he was made a count. In 1888 he was made a general field marshal, after which he was in command of the 4th and 3rd army inspections. He retired in 1896, and died at Quellendorf near Köthen on the 21st of December 1900.
BLUMENTHAL, LEONHARD, Count von (1810-1900), Prussian field marshal, son of Captain Ludwig von Blumenthal (killed in 1813 at the battle of Dennewitz), was born in Schwedt-on-Oder on July 30, 1810. He was educated at military schools in Culm and Berlin and joined the Guards as a 2nd lieutenant in 1827. After serving in the Rhine provinces, he joined the topographical division of the general staff in 1846. As a lieutenant of the 31st foot, he participated in the suppression of the Berlin riots in 1848, and in 1849 he was promoted to captain on the general staff. That same year, he served on the staff of General von Bonin during the Schleswig-Holstein campaign, where he distinguished himself, especially at Fredericia, leading to his appointment as chief of staff of the Schleswig-Holstein army. In 1850, he was a general staff officer of the mobile division under von Tietzen in Hesse-Cassel. He was sent on a mission to England that year (4th class of Red Eagle) and on several subsequent occasions. After rising to the rank of lieutenant-colonel, he was appointed personal adjutant to Prince Frederick Charles in 1859. In 1860, he became the colonel of the 31st, and later of the 71st, regiment. He was chief of staff of the III. army corps when the Danish War of 1864 broke out, and he was appointed chief of the general staff of the army against Denmark. He showed remarkable skill, especially at Düppel and during the passage to Alsen Island, which led to his promotion to major-general and him receiving the order pour le mérite. During the 1866 war, Blumenthal served as chief of the general staff to the crown prince of Prussia, who commanded the 2nd army. This army faced the majority of the fighting, and at Königgrätz, it shifted the tide of battle. Blumenthal's contributions during these battles and throughout the campaign were highly notable. On the field at Königgrätz, the crown prince addressed his chief of staff, saying, “I know to whom I owe the conduct of my army,” and Blumenthal was soon promoted to lieutenant-general and received the oak-leaf of the order pour le mérite. He was also knighted in the Hohenzollern Order. From 1866 to 1870, he commanded the 14th division in Düsseldorf. During the Franco-German War of 1870-71, he served as chief of staff of the 3rd army under the crown prince. Blumenthal’s military qualities and skill were most evident in the critical days leading up to the battle of Sedan, and his contributions in the war were considered almost as valuable and significant as those of Moltke himself. In 1871, Blumenthal represented Germany at the British maneuvers at Chobham and was given command of the IV. army corps in Magdeburg. In 1873, he became a general of infantry, and a decade later, he was made a count. In 1888, he was promoted to general field marshal, after which he commanded the 4th and 3rd army inspections. He retired in 1896 and passed away in Quellendorf near Köthen on December 21, 1900.
Blumenthal’s diary of 1866 and 1870-1871 has been edited by his son, Count Albrecht von Blumenthal (Tagebuch des G.F.M. von Blumenthal), 1902; an English translation (Journals of Count von Blumenthal) was published in 1903.
Blumenthal’s diary from 1866 and 1870-1871 has been edited by his son, Count Albrecht von Blumenthal (Tagebuch des G.F.M. von Blumenthal), 1902; an English translation (Journals of Count von Blumenthal) was published in 1903.
BLUNDERBUSS (a corruption of the Dutch donder, thunder, and the Dutch bus; cf. Ger. Büchse, a box or tube, hence a thunder-box or gun), an obsolete muzzle-loading firearm with a bell-shaped muzzle. Its calibre was large so that it could contain many balls or slugs, and it was intended to be fired at a short range, so that some of the charge was sure to take effect. The word is also used by analogy to describe a blundering and random person or talker.
BLUNDERBUSS (a variation of the Dutch donder, meaning thunder, and the Dutch bus; see also Ger. Büchse, which means a box or tube, thus a thunder-box or gun), is an outdated muzzle-loading firearm with a wide, flared muzzle. Its caliber was large enough to hold multiple balls or slugs, and it was designed to be fired at close range, ensuring that some of the shot would hit its target. The term is also used metaphorically to describe someone who is clumsy or speaks in a haphazard manner.
BLUNT, JOHN HENRY (1823-1884), English divine, was born at Chelsea in 1823, and before going to the university of Durham in 1850 was for some years engaged in business as a manufacturing chemist. He was ordained in 1852 and took his M.A. degree in 1855, publishing in the same year a work on The Atonement. He held in succession several preferments, among them the vicarage of Kennington near Oxford (1868), which he vacated in 1873 for the crown living of Beverston in Gloucestershire. He had already gained some reputation as an industrious theologian, and had published among other works an annotated edition of the Prayer Book (1867), a History of the English Reformation (1868), and a Book of Church Law (1872), as well as a useful Dictionary of Doctrinal and Historical Theology (1870). The continuation of these labours was seen in a Dictionary of Sects and Heresies (1874), an Annotated Bible (3 vols., 1878-1879), and a Cyclopaedia of Religion (1884), and received recognition in the shape of the D.D. degree bestowed on him in 1882. He died in London on the 11th of April 1884.
BLUNT, JOHN HENRY (1823-1884), English clergyman, was born in Chelsea in 1823. Before attending the University of Durham in 1850, he worked for several years as a manufacturing chemist. He was ordained in 1852 and earned his M.A. degree in 1855, the same year he published a book on The Atonement. He held various positions, including the vicarage of Kennington near Oxford (1868), which he left in 1873 for the crown living of Beverston in Gloucestershire. By this time, he had gained recognition as a diligent theologian, having published several works, including an annotated edition of the Prayer Book (1867), a History of the English Reformation (1868), and a Book of Church Law (1872), as well as a helpful Dictionary of Doctrinal and Historical Theology (1870). He continued this work with a Dictionary of Sects and Heresies (1874), an Annotated Bible (3 vols., 1878-1879), and a Cyclopaedia of Religion (1884), which led to him being awarded the D.D. degree in 1882. He passed away in London on April 11, 1884.
BLUNT, JOHN JAMES (1794-1855), English divine, was born at Newcastle-under-Lyme in Staffordshire, and educated at St John’s College, Cambridge, where he took his degree as fifteenth wrangler and obtained a fellowship (1816). He was appointed a Wort’s travelling bachelor 1818, and spent some time in Italy and Sicily, afterwards publishing an account of his journey. He proceeded M.A. in 1819, B.D. 1826, and was Hulsean Lecturer in 1831-1832 while holding a curacy in Shropshire. In 1834 he became rector of Great Oakley in Essex, and in 1839 was appointed Lady Margaret professor of divinity at Cambridge. In 1854 he declined the see of Salisbury, and he died on the 18th of June 1855. His chief book was Undesigned Coincidences in the Writings both of the Old and New Testaments 93 (1833; fuller edition, 1847). Some of his writings, among them the History of the Christian Church during the First Three Centuries and the lectures On the Right Use of the Early Fathers, were published posthumously.
BLUNT, JOHN JAMES (1794-1855), an English theologian, was born in Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire, and studied at St John's College, Cambridge, where he graduated as the fifteenth wrangler and earned a fellowship in 1816. He was appointed a Wort's travelling bachelor in 1818 and spent some time in Italy and Sicily, later publishing a narrative of his journey. He received his M.A. in 1819 and B.D. in 1826, and served as Hulsean Lecturer in 1831-1832 while also holding a curacy in Shropshire. In 1834, he became the rector of Great Oakley in Essex, and in 1839, he was named Lady Margaret professor of divinity at Cambridge. In 1854, he declined the position of bishop of Salisbury, and he passed away on June 18, 1855. His main work was Undesigned Coincidences in the Writings both of the Old and New Testaments 93 (1833; expanded edition, 1847). Some of his writings, including History of the Christian Church during the First Three Centuries and the lectures On the Right Use of the Early Fathers, were published after his death.
A short memoir of him appeared in 1856 from the hand of William Selwyn, his successor in the divinity professorship.
A brief memoir about him was published in 1856 by William Selwyn, who succeeded him in the divinity professorship.
BLUNT, WILFRID SCAWEN (1840- ), English poet and publicist, was born on the 17th of August 1840 at Petworth House, Sussex, the son of Francis Scawen Blunt, who served in the Peninsular War and was wounded at Corunna. He was educated at Stonyhurst and Oscott, and entered the diplomatic service in 1858, serving successively at Athens, Madrid, Paris and Lisbon. In 1867 he was sent to South America, and on his return to England retired from the service on his marriage with Lady Anne Noel, daughter of the earl of Lovelace and a grand-daughter of the poet Byron. In 1872 he succeeded, by the death of his elder brother, to the estate of Crabbet Park, Sussex, where he established a famous stud for the breeding of Arab horses. Mr and Lady Anne Blunt travelled repeatedly in northern Africa, Asia Minor and Arabia, two of their expeditions being described in Lady Anne’s Bedouins of the Euphrates (2 vols., 1879) and A Pilgrimage to Nejd (2 vols., 1881). Mr Blunt became known as an ardent sympathizer with Mahommedan aspirations, and in his Future of Islam (1888) he directed attention to the forces which afterwards produced the movements of Pan-Islamism and Mahdism. He was a violent opponent of the English policy in the Sudan, and in The Wind and the Whirlwind (in verse, 1883) prophesied its downfall. He supported the national party in Egypt, and took a prominent part in the defence of Arabi Pasha. Ideas about India (1885) was the result of two visits to that country, the second in 1883-1884. In 1885 and 1886 he stood unsuccessfully for parliament as a Home Ruler; and in 1887 he was arrested in Ireland while presiding over a political meeting in connexion with the agitation on Lord Clanricarde’s estate, and was imprisoned for two months in Kilmainham. His best-known volume of verse, Love Sonnets of Proteus (1880), is a revelation of his real merits as an emotional poet. The Poetry of Wilfrid Blunt (1888), selected and edited by W.E. Henley and Mr George Wyndham, includes these sonnets, together with “Worth Forest, a Pastoral,” “Griselda” (described as a “society novel in rhymed verse”), translations from the Arabic, and poems which had appeared in other volumes.
BLUNT, WILFRID SCAWEN (1840- ), English poet and publicist, was born on August 17, 1840, at Petworth House, Sussex, the son of Francis Scawen Blunt, who fought in the Peninsular War and was injured at Corunna. He was educated at Stonyhurst and Oscott and joined the diplomatic service in 1858, working in Athens, Madrid, Paris, and Lisbon. In 1867, he was assigned to South America, and after returning to England, he retired from the service after marrying Lady Anne Noel, the daughter of the Earl of Lovelace and a granddaughter of the poet Byron. In 1872, he inherited the estate of Crabbet Park, Sussex, after his older brother passed away, where he set up a famous breeding program for Arab horses. Mr. and Lady Anne Blunt traveled often to Northern Africa, Asia Minor, and Arabia, with two of their expeditions detailed in Lady Anne’s Bedouins of the Euphrates (2 vols., 1879) and A Pilgrimage to Nejd (2 vols., 1881). Mr. Blunt became known as a strong supporter of Muslim aspirations, and in his book Future of Islam (1888), he highlighted the forces that later contributed to the movements of Pan-Islamism and Mahdism. He was a fierce critic of English policy in the Sudan, and in The Wind and the Whirlwind (in verse, 1883), he predicted its collapse. He backed the national party in Egypt and played a significant role in defending Arabi Pasha. Ideas about India (1885) came from two visits to the country, the second between 1883 and 1884. In 1885 and 1886, he ran unsuccessfully for parliament as a Home Ruler; and in 1887, he was arrested in Ireland while leading a political meeting related to the protest on Lord Clanricarde’s estate and was imprisoned for two months in Kilmainham. His most famous collection of poems, Love Sonnets of Proteus (1880), reveals his true talent as an emotional poet. The Poetry of Wilfrid Blunt (1888), selected and edited by W.E. Henley and Mr. George Wyndham, includes these sonnets along with “Worth Forest, a Pastoral,” “Griselda” (described as a “society novel in rhymed verse”), translations from Arabic, and poems that had appeared in other collections.
BLUNTSCHLI, JOHANN KASPAR (1808-1881), Swiss jurist and politician, was born at Zürich on the 7th of March 1808, the son of a soap and candle manufacturer. From school he passed into the Politische Institut (a seminary of law and political science) in his native town, and proceeding thence to the universities of Berlin and Bonn, took the degree of doctor juris in the latter in 1829. Returning to Zurich in 1830, he threw himself with ardour into the political strife which was at the time unsettling all the cantons of the Confederation, and in this year published Über die Verfassung der Stadt Zürich (On the Constitution of the City of Zurich). This was followed by Das Volk und der Souverän (1830), a work in which, while pleading for constitutional government, he showed his bitter repugnance of the growing Swiss radicalism. Elected in 1837 a member of the Grosser Rath (Great Council), he became the champion of the moderate conservative party. Fascinated by the metaphysical views of the philosopher Friedrich Rohmer (1814-1856), a man who attracted little other attention, he endeavoured in Psychologische Studien über Staat und Kirche (1844) to apply them to political science generally, and in particular as a panacea for the constitutional troubles of Switzerland. Bluntschli, shortly before his death, remarked, “I have gained renown as a jurist, but my greatest desert is to have comprehended Rohmer.” This philosophical essay, however, coupled with his uncompromising attitude towards both radicalism and ultramontanism, brought him many enemies, and rendered his continuance in the council, of which he had been elected president, impossible. He resigned his seat, and on the overthrow of the Sonderbund in 1847, perceiving that all hope of power for his party was lost, took leave of Switzerland with the pamphlet Stimme eines Schweizers über die Bundesreform (1847), and settled at Munich, where he became professor of constitutional law in 1848.
BLUNTSCHLI, JOHANN KASPAR (1808-1881), Swiss lawyer and politician, was born in Zurich on March 7, 1808, the son of a soap and candle maker. After school, he attended the Politische Institut (a law and political science seminary) in his hometown, then went on to the universities of Berlin and Bonn, earning his degree in law from Bonn in 1829. He returned to Zurich in 1830 and eagerly got involved in the political turmoil affecting all the cantons of the Confederation at the time. That same year, he published Über die Verfassung der Stadt Zürich (On the Constitution of the City of Zurich). This was followed by Das Volk und der Souverän (1830), where he argued for constitutional government while expressing his strong opposition to the rising Swiss radicalism. Elected in 1837 to the Grosser Rath (Great Council), he became the leader of the moderate conservative party. Intrigued by the philosophical ideas of Friedrich Rohmer (1814-1856), a figure who received little recognition otherwise, he attempted in Psychologische Studien über Staat und Kirche (1844) to apply these ideas to political science in general and as a solution to Switzerland's constitutional issues. Just before his death, Bluntschli remarked, “I have gained fame as a lawyer, but my biggest achievement is understanding Rohmer.” However, this philosophical work, combined with his steadfast stance against both radicalism and ultramontanism, made him many enemies and made it impossible for him to stay in the council, from which he had been elected president. He resigned his position, and after the Sonderbund was defeated in 1847, realizing that all hope for his party's power was lost, he left Switzerland with the pamphlet Stimme eines Schweizers über die Bundesreform (1847), settling in Munich, where he became a professor of constitutional law in 1848.
At Munich he devoted himself with energy to the special work of his chair, and, resisting the temptation to identify himself with politics, published Allgemeines Staatsrecht (1851-1852); Lehre vom modernen Staat (1875-1876); and, in conjunction with Karl Ludwig Theodor Brater (1819-1869), Deutsches Staats-wörterbuch (II vols., 1857-1870: abridged by Edgar Loening in 3 vols., 1869-1875). Meanwhile he had assiduously worked at his code for the canton of Zürich, Privatrechtliches Gesetzbuch für den Kanton Zürich (4 vols., 1854-1856), a work which was much praised at the time, and which, particularly the section devoted to contracts, served as a model for codes both in Switzerland and other countries. In 1861 Bluntschli received a call to Heidelberg as professor of constitutional law (Staatsrecht), where he again entered the political arena, endeavouring in his Geschichte des allgemeinen Staatsrechts und der Politik (1864) “to stimulate,” as he said, “the political consciousness of the German people, to cleanse it of prejudices and to further it intellectually.” In his new home, Baden, he devoted his energies and political influence, during the Austro-Prussian War of 1866, towards keeping the country neutral. From this time Bluntschli became active in the field of international law, and his fame as a jurist belongs rather to this province than to that of constitutional law. His Das moderne Kriegsrecht (1866); Das moderns Völkerrecht (1868), and Das Beuterecht im Krieg (1878) are likely to remain invaluable text-books in this branch of the science of jurisprudence. He also wrote a pamphlet on the “Alabama” case.
At Munich, he dedicated himself energetically to his teaching role and, avoiding the lure of politics, published *Allgemeines Staatsrecht* (1851-1852); *Lehre vom modernen Staat* (1875-1876); and, in collaboration with Karl Ludwig Theodor Brater (1819-1869), *Deutsches Staats-wörterbuch* (2 vols., 1857-1870: abridged by Edgar Loening in 3 vols., 1869-1875). During this time, he also diligently worked on his code for the canton of Zürich, *Privatrechtliches Gesetzbuch für den Kanton Zürich* (4 vols., 1854-1856), which received much acclaim and, especially its section on contracts, became a model for codes in Switzerland and other countries. In 1861, Bluntschli was appointed as a professor of constitutional law (Staatsrecht) in Heidelberg, where he re-engaged with politics, aiming in his *Geschichte des allgemeinen Staatsrechts und der Politik* (1864) “to stimulate,” as he put it, “the political consciousness of the German people, to rid it of prejudices, and to advance it intellectually.” In his new home, Baden, he focused his energies and political influence on maintaining the country's neutrality during the Austro-Prussian War of 1866. From this point on, Bluntschli became involved in international law, and his reputation as a jurist is primarily associated with this area rather than constitutional law. His works, *Das moderne Kriegsrecht* (1866); *Das modernes Völkerrecht* (1868); and *Das Beuterecht im Krieg* (1878), are likely to remain essential textbooks in this branch of jurisprudence. He also wrote a pamphlet on the “Alabama” case.
Bluntschli was one of the founders, at Ghent in 1873, of the Institute of International Law, and was the representative of the German emperor at the conference on the international laws of war at Brussels. During the latter years of his life he took a lively interest in the Protestantenverein, a society formed to combat reactionary and ultramontane views of theology. He died suddenly at Karlsruhe on the 21st of October 1881. His library was acquired by Johns Hopkins University at Baltimore, U.S.A.
Bluntschli was one of the founders of the Institute of International Law in Ghent in 1873, and he represented the German emperor at the conference on international laws of war in Brussels. In the later years of his life, he became actively involved in the Protestantenverein, a society created to challenge reactionary and ultramontane theological views. He died unexpectedly in Karlsruhe on October 21, 1881. His library was acquired by Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, U.S.A.
Among his works, other than those before mentioned, may be cited Deutsches Privatrecht (1853-1854); Deutsche Staatslehre für Gebildete (1874); and Deutsche Staatslehre und die heutige Staatenwelt (1880).
Among his works, aside from those previously mentioned, we can also mention Deutsches Privatrecht (1853-1854); Deutsche Staatslehre für Gebildete (1874); and Deutsche Staatslehre und die heutige Staatenwelt (1880).
For notices of Bluntschli’s life and works see his interesting autobiography, Denkwurdiges aus meinem Leben (1884); von Holtzendorff, Bluntschli und seine Verdienste um die Staatswissenschaften (1882); Brockhaus, Konversations-Lexicon (1901); and a biography by Meyer von Kronau, in Allgemeine deutsche Biographie.
For information about Bluntschli’s life and works, check out his engaging autobiography, Denkwurdiges aus meinem Leben (1884); von Holtzendorff’s book, Bluntschli und seine Verdienste um die Staatswissenschaften (1882); Brockhaus’s Konversations-Lexicon (1901); and a biography by Meyer von Kronau, found in Allgemeine deutsche Biographie.
BLYTH, a market town and seaport of Northumberland, England, in the parliamentary borough of Morpeth, 9 m. E.S.E. of that town, at the mouth of the river Blyth, on a branch of the North Eastern railway. Pop. of urban district (1901) 5472. This is the port for a considerable coal-mining district, and its harbour, on the south side of the river, is provided with mechanical appliances for shipping coal. There are five dry docks, and upwards of 1 ½ m. of quayage. Timber is largely imported. Some shipbuilding and the manufacture of rope, sails and ship-fittings are carried on, and the fisheries are valuable. Blyth is also in considerable favour as a watering-place; there are a pleasant park, a pier, protecting the harbour, about 1 m. in length, and a sandy beach affording sea-bathing. The river Blyth rises near the village of Kirkheaton, and has an easterly course of about 25 m. through a deep, well-wooded and picturesque valley.
BLYTH, is a market town and seaport in Northumberland, England, located in the parliamentary borough of Morpeth, 9 miles E.S.E. of that town, at the mouth of the river Blyth, on a branch of the North Eastern railway. The population of the urban district was 5,472 in 1901. This port serves a significant coal-mining area, and its harbor, situated on the south side of the river, is equipped with machinery for loading coal. There are five dry docks and over 1.5 miles of quay. Timber is imported in large quantities. There is also some shipbuilding and the production of rope, sails, and ship fittings, and the fishing industry is important here. Blyth is quite popular as a seaside resort; it features a delightful park, a pier that protects the harbor and is about 1 mile long, and a sandy beach for sea-bathing. The river Blyth rises near the village of Kirkheaton and flows eastward for about 25 miles through a deep, well-wooded, and scenic valley.
B’NAI B’RITH (or Sons of the Covenant), INDEPENDENT ORDER OF, a Jewish fraternal society. It was founded at New York in 1843 by a number of German Jews, headed by Henry Jones, and is the oldest as well as the largest of the Jewish fraternal organizations. Its membership in 1908 was 35,870, its 481 lodges and 10 grand lodges being distributed over the United States, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Rumania, Egypt and Palestine. Its objects are to promote a high morality among Jews, regardless of differences as to dogma and ceremonial customs, and especially to inculcate the supreme virtues of 94 charity and brotherly love. Political and religious discussions were from the first excluded from the debates of the order. In 1851 the first grand lodge was established at New York; in 1856, the number of district lodges having increased, the supreme authority was vested in a central body consisting of one member from each lodge; and by the present constitution, adopted in 1868, this authority is vested in a president elected for five years, an executive committee and court of appeals (elected as before). The first lodge in Germany was instituted at Berlin in 1883. A large number of charitable and other public institutions have been established in the United States and elsewhere by the order, of which may be mentioned the large orphan asylum in Cleveland, the home for the aged and infirm at Yonkers, N.Y., the National Jewish hospital for consumptives at Denver, and the Maimonides library in New York City. The B’nai B’rith society has also co-operated largely with other Jewish philanthropic organizations in succouring distressed Israelites throughout the world.
B'nai B'rith (or Sons of the Covenant) is an INDEPENDENT ORDER OF, a Jewish fraternal organization. It was founded in New York in 1843 by a group of German Jews led by Henry Jones, making it the oldest and largest Jewish fraternal society. In 1908, its membership reached 35,870, with 481 lodges and 10 grand lodges spread across the United States, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Romania, Egypt, and Palestine. The organization aims to promote high moral standards among Jews, regardless of theological or ceremonial differences, particularly emphasizing the core values of 94 charity and brotherly love. Political and religious discussions have always been excluded from the order's debates. In 1851, the first grand lodge was established in New York; by 1856, as the number of district lodges grew, supreme authority was assigned to a central body made up of one member from each lodge. According to the present constitution adopted in 1868, this authority is held by a president elected for five years, along with an executive committee and court of appeals (elected in the same manner). The first lodge in Germany was established in Berlin in 1883. A significant number of charitable and public institutions have been created in the United States and abroad by the order, including a large orphan asylum in Cleveland, a home for the elderly and infirm in Yonkers, N.Y., the National Jewish Hospital for Consumptives in Denver, and the Maimonides Library in New York City. The B’nai B’rith society has also worked closely with other Jewish philanthropic organizations to support distressed Jews around the world.
See the Jewish Encyclopaedia (1902), s.v.
See the Jewish Encyclopedia (1902), s.v.
BOA, a name formerly applied to all large serpents which, devoid of poison fangs, kill their prey by constriction; but now confined to that subfamily of the Boidae which are devoid of teeth in the praemaxilla and are without supraorbital bones. The others are known as pythons (q.v.). The true boas comprise some forty species; most of them are American, but the genus Eryx inhabits North Africa, Greece and south-western Asia; the genus Enygrus ranges from New Guinea to the Fiji; Casarea dussumieri is restricted to Round Island, near Mauritius; and two species of Boa and one of Corallus represent this subfamily in Madagascar, while all the other boas live in America, chiefly in tropical parts. All Boidae possess vestiges of pelvis and hind limbs, appearing externally as claw-like spurs on each side of the vent, but they are so small that they are practically without function in climbing. The usually short tail is prehensile.
BOA, is a term that used to refer to all large snakes that, lacking venomous fangs, kill their prey by squeezing them; but now it specifically refers to the subfamily of the Boidae that have no teeth in the praemaxilla and lack supraorbital bones. The others are known as pythons (q.v.). The true boas consist of about forty species; most of them are found in America, but the genus Eryx lives in North Africa, Greece, and southwestern Asia; the genus Enygrus ranges from New Guinea to Fiji; Casarea dussumieri is only found on Round Island, near Mauritius; and two species of Boa and one of Corallus are the representatives of this subfamily in Madagascar, while all the other boas are primarily in America, mostly in tropical regions. All Boidae have remnants of pelvis and hind limbs, which appear as tiny claw-like spurs on each side of the vent, but they are so small that they serve almost no purpose for climbing. The typically short tail is prehensile.
One of the commonest species of the genus Boa is the Boa constrictor, which has a wide range from tropical Mexico to Brazil. The head is covered with small scales, only one of the preoculars being enlarged. The general colour is a delicate pale brown, with about a dozen and a half darker cross-bars, which are often connected by a still darker dorso-lateral streak, enclosing large oval spots. On each side is a series of large dark brown spots with light centres. On the tail the markings become bolder, brick red with black and yellow. The under parts are yellowish with black dots. This species rarely reaches a length of more than 10 ft. It climbs well, prefers open forest in the neighbourhood of water, is often found in plantations where it retires into a hole in the ground, and lives chiefly on birds and small mammals. Like most true boas, it is of a very gentle disposition and easily domesticates itself in the palm or reed thatched huts of the natives, where it hunts the rats during the night.
One of the most common species of the genus Boa is the Boa constrictor, which ranges from tropical Mexico to Brazil. Its head has small scales, with only one of the preocular scales being larger. The overall color is a light pale brown, featuring about a dozen and a half darker cross-bars, often connected by a darker stripe on the sides, which surrounds large oval spots. On each side, there are large dark brown spots with lighter centers. The tail has bolder markings, showing brick red with black and yellow. The underside is yellowish with black dots. This species usually doesn’t grow longer than 10 ft. It climbs well and prefers open forests near water, often found in plantations where it takes refuge in burrows, and mainly feeds on birds and small mammals. Like most true boas, it has a very gentle nature and can easily adapt to living in the palm or thatched huts of local people, where it hunts for rats at night.
The term “boa” is applied by analogy to a long article of women’s dress wound round the neck.
The term "boa" is used to refer to a long piece of women's clothing wrapped around the neck.
BOABDIL (a corruption of the name Abu Abdullah), the last Moorish king of Granada, called el chico, the little, and also el zogoybi, the unfortunate. A son of Muley Abu’l Hassan, king of Granada, he was proclaimed king in 1482 in place of his father, who was driven from the land. Boabdil soon after sought to gain prestige by invading Castile. He was taken prisoner at Lucena in 1483, and only obtained his freedom by consenting to hold Granada as a tributary kingdom under Ferdinand and Isabella, king and queen of Castile and Aragon. The next few years were consumed in struggles with his father and his uncle Abdullah ez Zagal. In 1491 Boabdil was summoned by Ferdinand and Isabella to surrender the city of Granada, and on his refusal it was besieged by the Castilians. Eventually, in January 1492, Granada was surrendered, and the king spent some time on the lands which he was allowed to hold in Andalusia. Subsequently he crossed to Africa, and is said to have been killed in battle fighting for his kinsman, the ruler of Fez. The spot from which Boabdil looked for the last time on Granada is still shown, and is known as “the last sigh of the Moor” (el ultimo suspire del Moro).
BOABDIL (a variation of the name Abu Abdullah), the last Moorish king of Granada, was called el chico, meaning the little, and also el zogoybi, meaning the unfortunate. As the son of Muley Abu’l Hassan, king of Granada, he was proclaimed king in 1482 after his father was driven out of the kingdom. Boabdil soon sought to improve his status by invading Castile. He was captured in Lucena in 1483 and only gained his freedom by agreeing to rule Granada as a tributary kingdom under Ferdinand and Isabella, the king and queen of Castile and Aragon. The following years were filled with conflicts with his father and his uncle Abdullah ez Zagal. In 1491, Ferdinand and Isabella ordered Boabdil to surrender the city of Granada, and when he refused, it was besieged by the Castilians. Ultimately, in January 1492, Granada fell, and the king spent some time on the lands he was permitted to keep in Andalusia. He later moved to Africa and was said to have died in battle while fighting for his relative, the ruler of Fez. The place where Boabdil had his last glimpse of Granada is still marked, known as “the last sigh of the Moor” (el ultimo suspire del Moro).
See J.A. Conde, Dominácion de los Arabes en España (Paris, 1840), translated into English by Mrs J. Foster (London, 1854-1855); Washington Irving, The Alhambra (New York, ed. 1880).
See J.A. Conde, Dominación de los Árabes en España (Paris, 1840), translated into English by Mrs. J. Foster (London, 1854-1855); Washington Irving, The Alhambra (New York, ed. 1880).
BOADICEA, strictly Boudicca, a British queen in the time of the emperor Nero. Her husband Prasutagus ruled the Icĕni (in what is now Norfolk) as an autonomous prince under Roman suzerainty. On his death (A.D. 61) without male heir, his dominions were annexed, and the annexation was carried out brutally. He had by his will divided his private wealth between his two daughters and Nero, trusting thereby to win imperial favour for his family. Instead, his wife was scourged (doubtless for resisting the annexation), his daughters outraged, his chief tribesmen plundered. The proud, fierce queen and her people rose, and not alone. With them rose half Britain, enraged, for other causes, at Roman rule. Roman taxation and conscription lay heavy on the province; in addition, the Roman government had just revoked financial concessions made a few years earlier, and L. Annaeus Seneca, who combined the parts of a moralist and a money-lender, had abruptly recalled large loans made from his private wealth to British chiefs. A favourable chance for revolt was provided by the absence of the governor-general, Suetonius Paulinus, and most of his troops in North Wales and Anglesey. All south-east Britain joined the movement. Paulinus rushed back without waiting for his troops, but he could do nothing alone. The Britons burnt the Roman municipalities of Verulam and Colchester, the mart of London, and several military posts, massacred “over 70,000” Romans and Britons friendly to Rome, and almost annihilated the Ninth Legion marching from Lincoln to the rescue. At last Paulinus, who seems to have rejoined his army, met the Britons in the field. The site of the battle is unknown. One writer has put it at Chester; others at London, where King’s Cross had once a narrow escape of being christened Boadicea’s Cross, and actually for many years bore the name of Battle Bridge, in supposed reference to this battle. Probably, however, it was on Watling Street, between London and Chester. In a desperate soldiers’ battle Rome regained the province. Boadicea took poison; thousands of Britons fell in the fight or were hunted down in the ensuing guerrilla. Finally, Rome adopted a kindlier policy, and Britain became quiet. But the scantiness of Romano-British remains in Norfolk may be due to the severity with which the Icĕni were crushed.
BOADICEA, more commonly known as Boudica, was a British queen during the reign of Emperor Nero. Her husband, Prasutagus, ruled the Iceni (in present-day Norfolk) as an independent prince under Roman authority. When he died in CE 61 without a male heir, his territories were taken over, and the takeover was brutal. He had left his personal wealth to his two daughters and Nero in his will, hoping to gain favor with the empire for his family. Instead, his wife was whipped (most likely for opposing the annexation), his daughters were violated, and his main tribesmen were robbed. The proud and fierce queen and her people rose up, along with half of Britain, who were also angered by Roman rule. Roman taxes and conscription were harsh on the province; additionally, the Roman government had just canceled financial favors granted a few years earlier, and L. Annaeus Seneca, who acted as both a moralist and a money-lender, had abruptly demanded repayment of large loans he had given to British leaders. A good opportunity for revolt arose with the absence of the governor-general, Suetonius Paulinus, and most of his troops in North Wales and Anglesey. All of southeast Britain joined the uprising. Paulinus hurried back without waiting for his forces but was powerless on his own. The Britons burned the Roman cities of Verulam and Colchester, the market area of London, and several military posts, killing “over 70,000” Romans and Britons sympathetic to Rome, and nearly wiped out the Ninth Legion on its way from Lincoln to provide support. Eventually, Paulinus, who seems to have reconnected with his army, confronted the Britons on the battlefield. The exact location of the battle is unknown. Some historians suggest it was at Chester, others at London, where King’s Cross almost got the name Boadicea’s Cross and was known for many years as Battle Bridge, supposedly referring to this fight. However, it was likely on Watling Street, between London and Chester. In a fierce battle, Rome regained control of the province. Boadicea took poison; thousands of Britons died in battle or were hunted down in the following guerrilla warfare. Eventually, Rome implemented a kinder policy, and Britain became calm. But the scarcity of Roman-British remains in Norfolk might be attributed to the harshness with which the Iceni were defeated.
See Tacitus, Annals, xiv.; Agric. xv.; Dio lxii. The name Boudicca seems to mean in Celtic much the same as Victoria.
See Tacitus, Annals, xiv.; Agric. xv.; Dio lxii. The name Boudicca appears to mean in Celtic something similar to Victoria.
BOAR (O. Eng. bār; the word is found only in W. Ger. languages, cf. Dutch beer, Ger. Eber), the name given to the un-castrated male of the domestic pig (q.v.), and to some wild species of the family Suidae (see Swine). The European wild boar (Sus scrofa) is distributed over Europe, northern Africa, and central and northern Asia. It has long been extinct in the British Isles, where it once abounded, but traces have been found of its survival in Chartley Forest, Staffordshire, in an entry of 1683 in an account-book of the steward of the manor, and it possibly remained till much later in the more remote parts of Scotland and Ireland (J.E. Harting, Extinct British Animals, 1880). The wild boar is still found in Europe, in marshy woodland districts where there is plenty of cover, and it is fairly plentiful in Spain, Austria, Russia and Germany, particularly in the Black Forest.
BOAR (Old English bār; the term is found only in West Germanic languages, see Dutch beer, German Eber), refers to the uncastrated male of the domestic pig (q.v.), and some wild species from the family Suidae (see Swine). The European wild boar (Sus scrofa) can be found across Europe, northern Africa, and central and northern Asia. It has been extinct in the British Isles, where it once thrived, but there are traces of its existence found in Chartley Forest, Staffordshire, in a 1683 entry from the steward's account book, and it may have survived much longer in remote areas of Scotland and Ireland (J.E. Harting, Extinct British Animals, 1880). The wild boar still exists in Europe, particularly in marshy woodlands with ample cover, and is relatively abundant in Spain, Austria, Russia, and Germany, especially in the Black Forest.
From the earliest times, owing to its great strength, speed, and ferocity when at bay, the boar has been one of the favourite beasts of the chase. Under the old forest laws of England it was one of the “beasts of the forest,” and, as such, under the Norman kings the unprivileged killing of it was punishable by death or the loss of a member. It was hunted in England and in Europe on foot and on horseback with dogs, while the weapon of attack was always the spear. In Europe the wild boar is still hunted with dogs, but the spear, except when used in emergencies and for giving the coup de grâce, has been given up for the gun. It is also shot in great forest drives in Austria, Germany and Russia. The Indian wild boar (Sus cristatus) is slightly taller than Sus scrofa, standing some 30 to 40 in. at the shoulder. It 95 is found throughout India, Ceylon and Burma. Here the horse and spear are still used, and the sport is one of the most popular in India. (See Pig-sticking.)
From ancient times, due to its incredible strength, speed, and fierceness when cornered, the boar has been a favorite game animal. According to the old forest laws of England, it was one of the "beasts of the forest," and during the Norman kings' rule, killing it without permission could result in death or amputation. In England and across Europe, it was hunted on foot and horseback with dogs, and the primary weapon was always the spear. In Europe, the wild boar is still hunted with dogs, but the spear has largely been replaced by firearms, except in emergencies or for delivering the coup de grâce. It is also hunted in large forest drives in Austria, Germany, and Russia. The Indian wild boar (Sus cristatus) is slightly taller than Sus scrofa, standing about 30 to 40 inches at the shoulder. It can be found all over India, Ceylon, and Burma. Here, horses and spears are still used, and this sport is among the most popular in India. (See Pig-sticking.)
The boar is one of the four heraldic beasts of venery, and was the cognizance of Richard III., king of England. As an article of food the boar’s head was long considered a special delicacy, and its serving was attended with much ceremonial. At Queen’s College, Oxford, the dish is still brought on Christmas day in procession to the high-table, accompanied by the singing of a carol.
The boar is one of the four heraldic animals associated with hunting and was the emblem of Richard III, king of England. As a food item, the boar's head was always seen as a special delicacy, and its presentation came with a lot of ceremony. At Queen's College, Oxford, the dish is still paraded to the high table on Christmas Day, accompanied by singing a carol.
BOARD (O. Eng. bord), a plank or long narrow piece of timber. The word comes into various compounds to describe boards used for special purposes, or objects like boards (drawing-board, ironing-board, sounding-board, chess-board, cardboard, back-board, notice-board, scoring-board). The phrase “to keep one’s name on the boards,” at Cambridge University, signifies to remain a member of a college; at Oxford it is “on the books.” In bookbinding, pasteboard covers are called boards. Board was early used of a table, hence such phrases as “bed and board,” “board and lodging”; or of a gaming-table, as in the phrase “to sweep the board,” meaning to pocket all the stakes, hence, figuratively, to carry all before one. The same meaning leads to “Board of Trade,” “Local Government Board,” &c.
BOARD (O. Eng. bord), a plank or long narrow piece of wood. The word appears in various combinations to describe boards used for specific purposes, or items like boards (drawing board, ironing board, sounding board, chess board, cardboard, backboard, notice board, scoring board). The phrase “to keep one’s name on the boards” at Cambridge University means to remain a member of a college; at Oxford, it’s “on the books.” In bookbinding, pasteboard covers are referred to as boards. The term board was originally used for a table, which is why we have phrases like “bed and board,” “board and lodging,” or it can refer to a gaming table, as in the phrase “to sweep the board,” meaning to win all the stakes, and by extension, to be completely successful. This same idea gives rise to terms like “Board of Trade,” “Local Government Board,” etc.
From the meaning of border or side, and especially ship’s side, comes “sea-board,” meaning sea-coast, and the phrases “aboard” (Fr. abord), “over-board,” “by the board”; similarly “weather-board,” the side of a ship which is to windward; “larboard and starboard” (the former of uncertain origin, Mid. Eng. laddeboard or latheboard; the latter meaning “steering side,” O. Eng. steorbord, the rudder of early ships working over the steering side), signifying (to one standing at the stern and looking forward) the left and right sides of the ship respectively.
From the meaning of border or side, especially the side of a ship, comes “sea-board,” which means sea-coast, and phrases like “aboard” (Fr. abord), “over-board,” and “by the board”; similarly, “weather-board” refers to the side of a ship that faces the wind; “larboard and starboard” (the former of uncertain origin, Mid. Eng. laddeboard or latheboard; the latter meaning “steering side,” O. Eng. steorbord, where the rudder of early ships worked over the steering side), signifying (to someone standing at the stern and looking forward) the left and right sides of the ship respectively.
BOARDING-HOUSE, a private house in which the proprietor provides board and lodging for paying guests. The position of a guest in a boarding-house differs in English law, to some extent, on the one hand from that of a lodger in the ordinary sense of the term, and on the other from that of a guest in an inn. Unlike the lodger, he frequently has not the exclusive occupation of particular rooms. Unlike the guest in an inn, his landlord has no lien upon his property for rent or any other debt due in respect of his board (Thompson v. Lacy, 1820, 3 B. and Ald. 283). The landlord is under an obligation to take reasonable care for the safety of property brought by a guest into his house, and is liable for damages in case of breach of this obligation (Scarborough v. Cosgrove, 1905, 2 K.B. 803). Again, unlike the innkeeper, a boarding-house keeper does not hold himself out as ready to receive all travellers for whom he has accommodation, for which they are ready to pay, and of course he is entitled to get rid of any guest on giving reasonable notice (see Lamond v. Richard, 1897, I Q.B. 541, 548). What is reasonable notice depends on the terms of the contract; and, subject thereto, the course of payment of rent is a material circumstance (see Landlord and Tenant). Apparently the same implied warranty of fitness for habitation at the commencement of the tenancy which exists in the case of furnished lodgings (see Lodger and Lodgings) exists also in the case of boarding-houses; and the guest in a boarding-house, like a lodger, is entitled to all the usual and necessary conveniences of a dwelling-house.
BOARDING HOUSE, a private residence where the owner provides meals and lodging for paying guests. The status of a guest in a boarding-house differs in English law, to some extent, on one hand from that of a lodger in the traditional sense, and on the other from that of a guest in an inn. Unlike a lodger, a guest often does not have exclusive access to specific rooms. Unlike an inn guest, the landlord has no claim on the guest's belongings for unpaid rent or other debts related to their stay (Thompson v. Lacy, 1820, 3 B. and Ald. 283). The landlord is required to take reasonable care of any property a guest brings into the house and is responsible for damages if he fails in this duty (Scarborough v. Cosgrove, 1905, 2 K.B. 803). Furthermore, unlike an innkeeper, a boarding-house owner does not present themselves as available to accept all travelers in need of a place to stay, and they have the right to ask any guest to leave with reasonable notice (see Lamond v. Richard, 1897, I Q.B. 541, 548). What constitutes reasonable notice depends on the terms of the agreement; the history of rent payment is an important factor (see Landlord and Tenant). It seems that the same implied warranty of habitability at the start of the tenancy, which applies to furnished lodgings (see Lodger and Lodgings), also applies to boarding-houses; and a guest in a boarding-house, like a lodger, is entitled to all the usual and necessary amenities of a home.
The law of the United States is similar to English law.
The law in the United States is similar to English law.
Under the French Code Civil, claims for subsistence furnished to a debtor and his family during the last year of his life by boarding-house keepers (maîtres de pension) are privileged over the generality of moveables, the privilege being exerciseable after legal expenses, funeral expenses, the expenses of the last illness, and the wages of servants for the year elapsed and what is due for the current year (art. 2101 (5)). Keepers of taverns (aubergistes) and hotels (hôteliers) are responsible for the goods of their guests—the committal of which to their custody is regarded as a deposit of necessity (dépôt nécessaire). They are liable for the loss of such goods by theft, whether by servants or strangers, but not where the loss is due to force majeure (arts. 1952-1954). Their liability for money and bearer securities not actually deposited is limited to 1000 francs (law of 18th of April 1889). These provisions are reproduced in substance in the Civil Codes of Quebec (arts. 1814, 1815, 1994, 2006) and of St Lucia (art. 1889). In Quebec, boarding-house keepers have a lien on the goods of their guests for the value or price of any food or accommodation furnished to them, and have also a right to sell their baggage and other property, if the amount remains unpaid for three months, under conditions similar to those imposed on innkeepers in England (art. 1816 A; and see Inns and Innkeepers); also in the Civil Code of St Lucia (arts. 1578, 1714, 1715)
Under the French Civil Code, claims for basic living expenses provided to a debtor and his family during the last year of his life by boarding-house operators (maîtres de pension) take priority over general movable property. This priority applies after covering legal fees, funeral costs, expenses from the last illness, and wages for workers for the past year and what is owed for the current year (art. 2101 (5)). Tavern keepers (aubergistes) and hotel owners (hôteliers) are responsible for the belongings of their guests, as their acceptance of these items is considered a necessary deposit (dépôt nécessaire). They are liable for the loss of such belongings due to theft, whether by employees or outsiders, except when the loss is caused by force majeure (arts. 1952-1954). Their liability for money and negotiable securities that are not actually deposited is capped at 1000 francs (law of April 18, 1889). These rules are essentially repeated in the Civil Codes of Quebec (arts. 1814, 1815, 1994, 2006) and St Lucia (art. 1889). In Quebec, boarding-house operators have a lien on their guests' belongings for the value of any food or lodging they provided and can sell their guests' baggage and other property if payment remains unpaid for three months, under conditions similar to those imposed on innkeepers in England (art. 1816 A; and see Inns and Innkeepers); this is also reflected in the Civil Code of St Lucia (arts. 1578, 1714, 1715).
BOARDING-OUT SYSTEM, in the English poor law, the boarding-out of orphan or deserted children with suitable foster-parents. The practice was first authorized in 1868, though for many years previously it had been carried out by some boards of guardians on their own initiative. Boarding-out is governed by two orders of the Local Government Board, issued in 1889. The first permits guardians to board-out children within their own union, except in the metropolis. The second governs the boarding-out of children in localities outside the union. The sum payable to the foster-parents is not to exceed 4s. per week for each child. The system has been much discussed by authorities on the administration of the poor law. It has been objected that few working-men with an average-sized family can afford to devote such an amount for the maintenance of each child, and that, therefore, boarded-out children are better off than the children of the independent (Fawcett, Pauperism). Working-class guardians, also, do not favour the system, being suspicious as to the disinterestedness of the foster-parents. On the other hand, it is argued that from the economic and educational point of view much better results are obtained by boarding-out children; they are given a natural life, and when they grow up they are without effort merged in the general population (Mackay, Hist. Eng. Poor Law). See also Poor Law.
BOARDING-OUT SYSTEM, in English welfare law, refers to the practice of placing orphaned or abandoned children with suitable foster families. This approach was officially authorized in 1868, although some boards of guardians had already been doing it on their own initiative for several years prior. The boarding-out process is regulated by two orders from the Local Government Board issued in 1889. The first allows guardians to place children with foster families within their own union, except in metropolitan areas. The second regulates the placement of children in locations outside the union. The payment to foster parents cannot exceed 4 shillings per week for each child. This system has been heavily debated by experts in welfare law administration. Critics argue that few working-class families can afford such an expense for each child’s care, leading to claims that boarded-out children are often better off than those from independent families (Fawcett, Pauperism). Additionally, working-class guardians tend to oppose the system, suspecting the sincerity of the foster parents. Conversely, proponents argue that from both economic and educational perspectives, boarding-out children yields much better outcomes; they experience a more natural upbringing, and as they mature, they blend into the wider community without issues (Mackay, Hist. Eng. Poor Law). See also Poor Law.
The “boarding-out” of lunatics is, in Scotland, a regular part of the lunacy administration. It has also been successfully adopted in Belgium. (See Insanity.)
The practice of "boarding-out" people with mental illnesses is a standard aspect of mental health management in Scotland. It has also been effectively implemented in Belgium. (See Insanity.)
BOARDMAN, GEORGE DANA (1801-1831), American Baptist missionary, was born at Livermore, Me., and educated at Waterville College and Andover Theological Seminary. In 1825 he went to India as a missionary, and in 1827 to Burma, where his promising work among the Karens was cut short by his early death. His widow married another well-known Burmese missionary, Adoniram Judson.
BOARDMAN, GEORGE DANA (1801-1831), was an American Baptist missionary born in Livermore, Maine. He studied at Waterville College and Andover Theological Seminary. In 1825, he traveled to India as a missionary, and in 1827, he went to Burma, where his promising efforts with the Karens were tragically ended by his early death. His widow later married another prominent missionary in Burma, Adoniram Judson.
His son, George Dana Boardman, the younger (1828-1903), made the voyage from Burma to America alone when six years of age. He graduated in 1852 at Brown University, and from the Newton Theological Institution in 1855. He held Baptist pastorates at Rochester (1856-1864), and at Philadelphia, and was president of the American Baptist Missionary Union, 1880-1884. At Philadelphia he is said to have taken his congregation through every verse of the New Testament in 643 Wednesday evening lectures, which occupied nearly eighteen years, and afterwards to have begun on the Old Testament in similar fashion. Among his published works are Studies in the Model Prayer (1879), and Epiphanies of the Risen Lord (1879).
His son, George Dana Boardman, the younger (1828-1903), traveled alone from Burma to America at the age of six. He graduated from Brown University in 1852 and from the Newton Theological Institution in 1855. He served as a Baptist pastor in Rochester (1856-1864) and Philadelphia, and was president of the American Baptist Missionary Union from 1880 to 1884. In Philadelphia, he is said to have guided his congregation through every verse of the New Testament in 643 Wednesday evening lectures, which took almost eighteen years, and then started on the Old Testament in the same way. Some of his published works include Studies in the Model Prayer (1879) and Epiphanies of the Risen Lord (1879).
BOASE, HENRY SAMUEL (1799-1883), English geologist, the eldest son of Henry Boase (1763-1827), banker, of Madron, Cornwall, was born in London on the 2nd of September 1799. Educated partly at Tiverton grammar-school, and partly at Dublin, where he studied chemistry, he afterwards proceeded to Edinburgh and took the degree of M.D. in 1821. He then settled for some years as a medical practitioner at Penzance; there geology engaged his particular attention, and he became secretary of the Royal Geological Society of Cornwall. The results of his observations were embodied in his Treatise on Primary Geology (1834), a work of considerable merit in regard to the older crystalline and igneous rocks and the subject of 96 mineral veins. In 1837 he removed to London, where he remained for about a year, being elected F.R.S. In 1838 he became partner in a firm of bleachers at Dundee. He retired in 1871, and died on the 5th of May 1883.
BOASE, HENRY SAMUEL (1799-1883), English geologist, the oldest son of Henry Boase (1763-1827), a banker from Madron, Cornwall, was born in London on September 2, 1799. He was educated partly at Tiverton grammar school and partly in Dublin, where he studied chemistry. He later went to Edinburgh and earned an M.D. degree in 1821. He then practiced medicine in Penzance for several years, where he became particularly interested in geology and served as secretary of the Royal Geological Society of Cornwall. The findings from his research were compiled in his Treatise on Primary Geology (1834), a notable work on older crystalline and igneous rocks, as well as mineral veins. In 1837, he moved to London, where he stayed for about a year and was elected F.R.S. In 1838, he became a partner in a bleaching firm in Dundee. He retired in 1871 and passed away on May 5, 1883.
BOAT (O. Eng. bât; the true etymological connexion with Dutch and Ger. boot, Fr. bateau, Ital. battello presents great difficulties; Celtic forms are from O. Eng.), a comparatively small open craft for conveyance on water, usually propelled by some form of oar or sail.
BOAT (Old English bât; the real etymological connection with Dutch and German boot, French bateau, Italian battello is quite complex; Celtic forms come from Old English), a relatively small open vessel used for transportation on water, typically driven by some type of oar or sail.
The origin of the word “boat” is probably to be looked for in the A.S. bât = a stem, a stick, a piece of wood. If this be so, the term in its inception referred to the material of which the primitive vessel was constructed, and in this respect may well be contrasted with the word “ship,” of which the primary idea was the process by which the material was fashioned and adapted for the use of man.
The origin of the word “boat” likely comes from the Old English bât, meaning a stem, a stick, or a piece of wood. If this is correct, the term originally referred to the material used to make early vessels, which sets it apart from the word “ship,” whose primary meaning relates to the process of shaping and fitting the material for human use.
We may assume that primitive man, in his earliest efforts to achieve the feat of conveying himself and his belongings by water, succeeded in doing so—(1) by fastening together a quantity of material of sufficient buoyancy to float and carry him above the level of the water; (2) by scooping out a fallen tree so as to obtain buoyancy enough for the same purpose. In these two processes is to be found the genesis of both boat and ship, of which, though often used as convertible terms, the former is generally restricted to the smaller type of vessel such as is dealt with in this article. For the larger type the reader is referred to Ship.
We can assume that early humans, in their first attempts to transport themselves and their belongings by water, managed to do so—(1) by tying together enough materials that could float and support them above the water; (2) by hollowing out a fallen tree to create enough buoyancy for the same purpose. These two methods mark the beginning of both boats and ships, with "boat" typically referring to the smaller type of vessel discussed in this article. For the larger type, please refer to Ship.
Great must have been the triumph of the man who first discovered that the rushes or the trunks he had managed to tie together would, propelled by a stick or a branch (cf. ramus and remus) used as pole or paddle, convey him safely across the river or lake, which had hitherto been his barrier. But use multiplies wants, discovers deficiencies, suggests improvements. Man soon found out that he wanted to go faster than the raft would move, that the water washed over and up through it, and this need of speed, and of dry carrying power, which we find operative throughout the history of the boat down to the present day, drove him to devise other modes of flotation as well as to try to improve his first invention.
Great must have been the triumph of the man who first figured out that the rushes or trunks he managed to tie together could, with the help of a stick or branch (see ramus and remus) used as a pole or paddle, get him safely across the river or lake that had previously been a barrier. But usage brings new needs, reveals shortcomings, and suggests improvements. Soon, humans realized they wanted to go faster than the raft would allow, and that water flowed over and through it. This need for speed and better dryness, which we see throughout the history of boats to this day, pushed him to come up with other ways to float as well as to enhance his initial invention.
The invention of the hollowed trunk, of the “dug-out” (monoxylon), however it came about, whenever and wherever it came into comparison with the raft, must have superseded the latter for some purposes, though not by any means for all. It was superior to the raft in speed, and was, to a certain extent, water-tight. On the other hand it was inferior in carrying power and stability. But the two types once conceived had come to stay, and to them severally, or to attempts to combine the useful properties of both, may be traced all the varieties of vessel to which the name of boat may be applied.
The invention of the hollowed trunk, or “dug-out” (monoxylon), no matter how it originated or when and where it compared to the raft, must have replaced the raft for certain uses, but not for all. It was faster than the raft and was, to some degree, waterproof. However, it lacked the carrying capacity and stability of the raft. Once both types were created, they remained relevant, and all the different kinds of vessels referred to as boats can be traced back to these two or to efforts to combine their useful features.
The development of the raft is admirably illustrated in the description, given us by Homer in the Odyssey, of the construction by the hero Ulysses of a vessel of the kind. Floating timber is cut down and carefully shaped and planed with axe and adze, and the timbers are then exactly fitted face to face and compacted with trenails and dowels, just as the flat floor of a lump or lighter might be fashioned and fitted nowadays. A platform is raised upon the floor and a bulwark of osiers contrived to keep out the wash of the waves (cf. infra, Malay boats). It seems as if the poet, who was intimately acquainted with the sea ways of his time, intended to convey the idea of progress in construction, as illustrated by the technical skill of his hero, and the use of the various tools with which he supplies him.
The development of the raft is well illustrated in Homer’s description in the Odyssey, where the hero Ulysses builds a vessel of this kind. Floating timber is cut down and carefully shaped and smoothed with axes and adzes, and the pieces are then precisely fitted together and secured with wooden pegs and dowels, similar to how a flat floor of a barge might be created and fitted today. A platform is built on the floor, and a wall of willow branches is made to keep out the waves (cf. infra, Malay boats). It seems that the poet, who had a deep understanding of the sea practices of his time, aimed to convey the idea of progress in construction, showcased by the technical skill of his hero and the various tools he uses.
On the other hand the dug-out had its limitations. The largest tree that could be thrown and scooped out afforded but a narrow space for carrying goods, and presented problems as to stability which must have been very difficult to solve. The shaping of bow and stern, the bulging out of the sides, the flattening of the bottom, the invention of a keel piece, the attempt to raise the sides by building up with planks, all led on towards the idea of constructing a boat properly so called, or perhaps to the invention of the canoe, which in some ways may be regarded as the intermediate stage between dug-out and boat.
On the other hand, the dug-out had its limitations. The largest tree that could be hollowed out provided only a narrow space for carrying goods and posed significant stability issues that must have been very challenging to address. Shaping the bow and stern, bulging out the sides, flattening the bottom, inventing a keel piece, and trying to raise the sides by adding planks all contributed to the idea of building a proper boat, or perhaps to the invention of the canoe, which in some ways can be seen as the middle ground between a dug-out and a boat.
Meanwhile the raft had undergone improvements such as those which Homer indicates. It had arrived at a floor composed of timbers squared and shaped. It had risen to a platform, the prototype of a deck. It was but a step to build up the sides and turn up the ends, and at this point we reach the genesis of ark and punt, of sanpan and junk, or, in other words, of all the many varieties of flat-bottomed craft.
Meanwhile, the raft had been upgraded in ways that Homer mentioned. It now had a floor made of squared and shaped timber. It had transformed into a platform, similar to a deck. It was just a small step to build up the sides and shape the ends, and at this moment, we reach the beginnings of the ark and punt, the sanpan and junk, or, in other words, all the different types of flat-bottomed boats.
When once we have reached the point at which the improvements in the construction of the raft and dug-out bring them, as it were, within sight of each other, we can enter upon the history of the development of boats properly so called, which, in accordance with the uses and the circumstances that dictated their build, may be said to be descended from the raft or the dug-out, or from the attempt to combine the respective advantages of the two original types.
Once we reach the stage where the advances in building rafts and dug-outs bring them closer together, we can begin to explore the history of the development of boats in a more traditional sense. These boats, shaped by their intended use and the conditions that influenced their design, can be seen as evolving from the raft or dug-out, or from efforts to blend the best features of both original types.
Uses and circumstances are infinite in variety and have produced an infinite variety of boats. But we may safely say that in all cases the need to be satisfied, the nature of the material available, and the character of the difficulties to be overcome have governed the reason and tested the reasonableness of the architecture of the craft in use.
Uses and situations are countless and have resulted in a wide range of boats. However, we can confidently say that in every instance, the needs to be met, the materials available, and the types of challenges to be faced have influenced the reasoning and assessed the practicality of the boat designs in use.
It is not proposed in this article to enter at any length into the details of the construction of boats, but it is desirable, for the sake of clearness, to indicate certain broad distinctions in the method of building, which, though they run back into the far past, in some form or other survive and are in use at the present day.
It’s not the goal of this article to go into detail about boat construction, but it’s important, for clarity's sake, to point out some key differences in building methods that, although they date back to ancient times, still exist and are used today.
The tying of trunks together to form a raft is still not unknown in the lumber trade of the Danube or of North America, nor was it in early days confined to the raft. It extended to many boats properly so called, even to many of those built by the Vikings of old. It may still be seen in the Madras surf boats, and in those constructed out of driftwood by the inhabitants of Easter Island in the south Pacific. Virgil, who was an archaeologist, represents Charon’s boat on the Styx as of this construction, and notes the defect, which still survives, in the craft of the kind when loaded—
The practice of tying logs together to create a raft is still common in the lumber industry along the Danube and in North America. It wasn't just limited to rafts in the past; this technique was often used in various types of boats, including many made by the Vikings. You can still see it in Madras surf boats and in those made from driftwood by the people of Easter Island in the South Pacific. Virgil, who was an archaeologist, depicted Charon’s boat on the Styx as being built this way and pointed out a flaw that still exists in these types of vessels when they are loaded—
“Gemuit sub pondere cymba "Groaned under the weight of the boat" Sutilis, et multam accepit rimosa paludem!” Sutilis, et multam accepit rimosa paludem!” Aen. vi. 303. Aen. vi. 303. |
Next to the raft, and to be counted in direct descent from it, comes the whole class of flat-bottomed boats including punts and lighters. As soon as the method of constructing a solid floor, with trenails and dowels, had been discovered, the method of converting it into a water-tight box was pursued, sides were attached plank fashion, with strong knees to stiffen them, and cross pieces to yoke or key (cf. ζύγον κληίς) them together. These thwarts once fixed naturally suggested seats for those that plied the paddle or the oar. The ends of the vessel were shaped into bow or stern, either turned up, or with the side planking convergent in stem or stern post, or joined together fore and aft by bulkheads fitted in, while interstices were made water-tight by caulking, and by smearing with bitumen or some resinous material.
Next to the raft, and directly derived from it, we have the entire category of flat-bottomed boats, including punts and lighters. Once the method for building a solid floor using wooden pegs and dowels was discovered, efforts were made to turn it into a water-tight box. Sides were added in a planked style, reinforced with strong braces to add stability, and crosspieces to join them together. These seats naturally suggested places for those who used paddles or oars. The ends of the boat were shaped into a bow or stern, either raised, or with the side planks coming together at the front or back, or connected at both ends by fitted bulkheads, while gaps were sealed to be water-tight through caulking and by applying bitumen or some kind of resinous material.
The evolution of the boat as distinct from the punt, or flat-bottomed type, and following the configuration of the dug-out in its length and rounded bottom, must have taxed the inventive art and skill of constructors much more severely than that of the raft. It is possible that the coracle or the canoe may have suggested the construction of a framework of sufficient stiffness to carry a water-tight wooden skin, such as would successfully resist the pressure of wind and water. And in this regard two methods were open to the builder, both of which have survived to the present day: (1) the construction first of the shell of the boat, into which the stiffening ribs and cross ties were subsequently fitted; (2) the construction first of a framework of requisite size and shape, on to which the outer skin of the boat was subsequently attached.
The development of the boat, different from the punt or flat-bottomed type, and resembling the shape of the dug-out with its length and curved bottom, must have challenged the creativity and craftsmanship of builders much more than that of the raft. It's likely that the coracle or canoe may have inspired the design of a framework strong enough to support a water-tight wooden cover that could withstand the forces of wind and water. In this context, builders had two methods available, both of which are still used today: (1) first creating the shell of the boat, into which the reinforcing ribs and cross ties were later fitted; (2) first building a framework of the right size and shape, onto which the outer skin of the boat was then attached.
Further, besides the primitive mode of tying the parts together, two main types of build must be noticed, in accordance with which a boat is said to be either carvel-built or 97 clinker-built. (1) A boat is carvel-built when the planks are laid edge to edge so that they present a smooth surface without. (2) A boat is clinker-built when each plank is laid on so as to overlap the one below it, thus presenting a series of ledges running longitudinally.
Furthermore, in addition to the basic way of joining the parts together, there are two main building styles to consider, which determine whether a boat is called carvel-built or 97 clinker-built. (1) A boat is carvel-built when the planks are placed edge to edge, creating a smooth surface. (2) A boat is clinker-built when each plank is laid in a way that overlaps the one beneath it, resulting in a series of ledges running along the length of the boat.
The former method is said to be of Mediterranean, or perhaps of Eastern origin. The latter was probably invented by the old Scandinavian builders, and from them handed down through the fishing boats of the northern nations to our own time.
The first method is thought to have Mediterranean or possibly Eastern origins. The second was likely created by ancient Scandinavian builders and passed down through the fishing boats of northern countries to the present day.
The accounts of vessels used by the Egyptians and Phoenicians generally refer to larger craft which naturally fall under the head of Ship (q.v.). The Nile boats, however, described by Herodotus (ii. 60), built of acacia wood, Ancient boats. were no doubt of various sizes, some of them quite small, but all following the same type of construction, built up brick fashion, the blocks being fastened internally to long poles secured by cross pieces, and the interstices caulked with papyrus. The ends rose high above the water, and to prevent hogging were often attached by a truss running longitudinally over crutches from stem to stern.
The descriptions of ships used by the Egyptians and Phoenicians usually refer to larger vessels, which naturally fall under the category of Ship (q.v.). However, the Nile boats mentioned by Herodotus (ii. 60), made from acacia wood, Old boats. were likely of various sizes, some quite small, but all sharing the same construction style, built up like bricks, with the blocks attached internally to long poles reinforced by cross pieces, and the gaps sealed with papyrus. The ends of the boats rose high above the water, and to prevent bending, they were often secured with a truss running the length of the boat from front to back.
The Assyrian and Babylonian vessels described by Herodotus (i. 194), built up of twigs and boughs, and covered with skins smeared with bitumen, were really more like huge coracles and hardly deserve the name of boats.
The Assyrian and Babylonian vessels described by Herodotus (i. 194), made from twigs and branches, and covered with skins coated in tar, were actually more like giant coracles and hardly deserve to be called boats.
The use of boats by the Greeks and Romans is attested by the frequent reference to them in Greek and Latin literature, though, as regards such small craft, the details given are hardly enough to form the basis of an accurate classification.
The Greeks and Romans often referenced boats in their literature, which shows they used them frequently. However, when it comes to small craft, the details provided are not sufficient to create an accurate classification.
We hear of small boats attendant on a fleet (κελήτιον, Thuc. i. 53), and of similar craft employed in piracy (Thuc. iv. 9), and in one case of a sculling boat, or pair oar (ἀκάτιον ἀμφηρικόν, Thuc. iv. 67), which was carted up and down between the town of Megara and the sea, being used for the purpose of marauding at night. We are also familiar with the passage in the Acts (xxvii.) where in the storm they had hard work “to come by the boat”; which same boat the sailors afterwards “let down into the sea, under colour as though they would have cast anchors out of the foreship,” and would have escaped to land in her themselves, leaving the passengers to drown, if the centurion and soldiers acting upon St Paul’s advice had not cut off the ropes of the boat and let her fall off.
We hear about small boats that accompany a fleet (κελήτιον, Thuc. i. 53), and similar vessels used for piracy (Thuc. iv. 9). There's also a mention of a sculling boat or pair oar (ἀκάτιον ἀμφηρικόν, Thuc. iv. 67) that was transported back and forth between the town of Megara and the sea, used for raiding at night. Additionally, we are familiar with the passage in Acts (xxvii.) where, during a storm, they struggled “to come by the boat.” This same boat was later “let down into the sea, pretending as if they were going to cast anchors from the bow,” and would have escaped to land in it themselves, leaving the passengers to drown, if the centurion and soldiers hadn’t followed St. Paul’s advice and cut the ropes of the boat, letting it drift away.
There can be little doubt that boat races were in vogue among the Greeks (see Prof. Gardner, Journal of Hellenic Studies, ii. 91 ff.), and probably formed part of the Panathenaic and Isthmian festivals. It is, however, difficult to prove that small boats took part in these races, though it is not unlikely that they may have done so. The testimony of the coins, such as it is, points to galleys, and the descriptive term (νεῶν ἅμιλλα) leads to the same conclusion.
There’s no doubt that boat races were popular among the Greeks (see Prof. Gardner, Journal of Hellenic Studies, ii. 91 ff.), and they likely were part of the Panathenaic and Isthmian festivals. However, it’s hard to prove that small boats participated in these races, although it’s quite possible they did. The evidence from coins, such as it is, points to galleys, and the descriptive term (ship race) supports this conclusion.
It is hardly possible now to define the differences which separated ἄκατος, ἀκάτιον, from κέλης, κελήτιον, or from λέμβος or κάραβος. They seem all to have been rowing boats, probably carvel-built, some with keels (acatii modo carinata, Plin. ix. 19), and to have varied in size, some being simply sculling boats, and others running up to as many as thirty oars.
It’s nearly impossible now to pinpoint the differences that set apart ἄκατος, ἀκάτιον, from κέλης, κελήτιον, or from boat or όχημα. They all seem to have been rowing boats, probably made of carvel construction, some with keels (acatii modo carinata, Plin. ix. 19), and they varied in size, with some being just sculling boats and others having as many as thirty oars.
Similarly in Latin authors we have frequent mention of boats accompanying ships of war. Of this there is a well-known instance in the account of Caesar’s invasion of Britain (B.G. iv. 26), when the boats of the fleet, and the pinnaces, were filled with soldiers and sent to assist the Legionaries who were being fiercely attacked as they waded on to the shore. There is also an instance in the civil war, which is a prototype of a modern attack of torpedo boats upon men of war, when Antonius manned the pinnaces of his large ships to the number of sixty, and with them attacked and defeated an imprudent squadron of Quadriremes (B.C. iii. 24). The class of boats so frequently mentioned as actuariae seems to have contained craft of all sizes, and to have been used for all purposes, whether as pleasure boats or as despatch vessels, or for piracy. In fact the term was employed vaguely just as we speak of craft in general.
Similarly, in Latin literature, there are many mentions of boats accompanying warships. A well-known example is in the account of Caesar’s invasion of Britain (B.G. iv. 26), when the fleet's boats and smaller vessels were filled with soldiers and sent to help the Legionaries who were being fiercely attacked as they waded ashore. There's also an example from the civil war, which resembles a modern attack by torpedo boats on warships, when Antonius equipped the small boats of his large ships, totaling sixty, and used them to attack and defeat an unwary squadron of Quadriremes (B.C. iii. 24). The type of boats frequently referred to as actuariae seems to have included various sizes and served multiple purposes, whether as pleasure craft, dispatch vessels, or for piracy. In fact, the term was used broadly, similar to how we refer to vessels in general.
The lembus, which is often referred to in Livy and Polybius, seems to have been of Illyrian origin, with fine lines and sharp bows. The class contained boats of various sizes and with a variable number of oars (biremis, Livy xxiv. 40, sexdecim, Livy xxxiv. 35); and it is interesting to note the origin in this case, as the invention of the light Liburnian galleys, which won the battle of Actium, and altered the whole system of naval construction, came from the same seaboard.
The lembus, often mentioned by Livy and Polybius, seems to have come from Illyria, featuring sleek lines and sharp bows. This category included boats of different sizes and a varying number of oars (biremis, Livy xxiv. 40, sexdecim, Livy xxxiv. 35); it's interesting to note the origins here, as the creation of the light Liburnian galleys, which were key in the battle of Actium and changed naval construction entirely, also originated from the same coastline.
Besides these, the piratical myoparones (see Cic. In Verrem), and the poetical phaselus, deserve mention, but here again we are met with the difficulty of distinguishing boats from ships. There is also an interesting notice in Tacitus (Hist. iii. 47) of boats hastily constructed by the natives of the northern coast of Asia Minor, which he describes as of broad beam with narrow sides (probably meaning that the sides “tumbled home”), joined together without any fastenings of brass or iron. In a sea-way the sides were raised with planks added till they were cased in as with a roof, whence their name camarae, and so they rolled about in the waves, having prow and stern alike and convertible rowlocks, so that it was a matter of indifference and equally safe, or perhaps unsafe, whichever way they rowed.
Besides these, the pirate myoparones (see Cic. In Verrem) and the poetic phaselus are worth mentioning, but once again, we face the challenge of differentiating between boats and ships. Tacitus also provides an interesting note in Hist. iii. 47 about boats hastily made by the locals on the northern coast of Asia Minor, describing them as having a wide beam and narrow sides (likely indicating that the sides were “tumbled home”), put together without any brass or iron fastenings. When at sea, the sides were raised with added planks until they were covered like a roof, giving them the name camarae. They rolled around in the waves, having no distinct prow or stern, and had interchangeable rowlocks, making it equally safe, or possibly unsafe, to row in either direction.
Similar vessels were constructed by Germanicus in his north German campaign (Ann. ii. 6) and by the Suiones (Ger. 44). These also had stem and stern alike, and remind us of the old Norse construction, being rowed either way, having the oars loose in the rowlock, and not, as was usual in the south, attached by a thong to the thowl pin.
Similar ships were built by Germanicus during his campaign in northern Germany (Ann. ii. 6) and by the Suiones (Ger. 44). These ships had identical bow and stern and are reminiscent of the old Norse design. They could be rowed in either direction, with the oars loose in the rowlock, unlike the typical southern style where oars were attached with a thong to the thowl pin.
Lastly, as a class of boat directly descended from the raft, we may notice the flat-bottomed boats or punts or lighters which plied on the Tiber as ferry-boats, or carrying goods, which were called codicariae from caudex, the old word for a plank.
Lastly, as a type of boat that evolved from the raft, we can see the flat-bottomed boats or punts or lighters that operated on the Tiber as ferry boats or for transporting goods, which were called codicariae from caudex, the ancient term for a plank.
It is difficult to trace any order of development in the construction of boats during the Byzantine period, or the middle ages. Sea-going vessels according to their size carried one or more boats, some of them small boats with two or four oars, others boats of a larger size fitted with masts and sail as well as with oars. We find lembus and phaselus as generic names in the earlier period, but the indications as to size and character are vague and variable. The same may be said of the batelli, coquets, chaloupes, chalans, gattes, &c., of which, in almost endless number and variety, the nautical erudition of M. Jal has collected the names in his monumental works, Archéologie navale and the Glossaire nautique.
It’s tough to pinpoint a clear progression in boat construction during the Byzantine period or the Middle Ages. Sea vessels, depending on their size, could carry one or more smaller boats, with some featuring two or four oars, while others were larger and equipped with masts, sails, and oars. We see terms like lembus and phaselus used generically in earlier times, but details about their size and characteristics are uncertain and inconsistent. The same applies to the various types like batelli, coquets, chaloupes, chalans, gattes, etc., for which the maritime knowledge of M. Jal has gathered a vast array of names in his extensive works, Archéologie navale and Glossaire nautique.
It is clear, however, that in many instances the names, originally applied to boats properly so called, gradually attached themselves to larger vessels, as in the case of chaloupe and others, a fact which leads to the conclusion that the type of build followed originally in smaller vessels was often developed on a larger scale, according as it was found useful and convenient, while the name remained the same. Many of these types still survive and may be found in the Eastern seas, or in the Mediterranean or in the northern waters, each of which has its own peculiarities of build and rig.
It is clear, however, that in many cases, the names originally given to smaller boats eventually transferred to larger vessels, like the case of chaloupe and others. This suggests that the construction style used for smaller boats was often scaled up to larger sizes when it proved useful and convenient, even though the name stayed the same. Many of these types still exist and can be found in the Eastern seas, the Mediterranean, or the northern waters, each of which has its own unique design and rigging.
It would be impossible within our limits to do justice to the number and variety of existing types in sea-going boats, and for more detailed information concerning them the reader Existing types. would do well to consult Mast and Sail in Europe and Asia, by H. Warington Smyth, an excellent and exhaustive work, from which much of the information which follows regarding them has been derived.
It would be impossible for us to adequately cover the numerous types of sea-going boats, and for more detailed information about them, the reader Current types. should refer to Mast and Sail in Europe and Asia by H. Warington Smyth, which is an excellent and comprehensive work that has provided much of the information shared here.
In the Eastern seas the Chinese sanpan is ubiquitous. Originally a small raft of three timbers with fore end upturned, it grew into a boat in very early times, and has given its name to a very large class of vessels. With flat bottom, and considerable width in proportion to its length, the normal sanpan runs out into two tails astern, the timbers rounding up, and the end being built in like a bulkhead, with room for the rudder to work between it and the transom which connects the two projecting upper timbers of the stern. Some of them are as much as 30 ft. in 98 length and 8 to 10 ft. in beam. They are good carriers and speedy under sail.
In the Eastern seas, the Chinese sanpan is everywhere. It started as a small raft made of three pieces of wood with an upturned front, but it evolved into a boat a long time ago, giving its name to a large category of vessels. With a flat bottom and considerable width compared to its length, a typical sanpan features two tails at the back, where the wood curves up, and the end is built like a bulkhead, leaving space for the rudder to operate between it and the transom that connects the two upper projecting pieces of the stern. Some of them are as long as 30 ft. and 8 to 10 ft. wide. They are good for carrying loads and move quickly when using sails.
The Chinese in all probability were the earliest of all peoples to solve the chief problems of boat building, and after their own fashion to work out the art of navigation, which for them has now been set and unchanged for thousands of years. They appear to have used the lee-board and centre-board in junks and sanpans, and to have extended their trade to India and even beyond, centuries before anything like maritime enterprise is heard of in the north of Europe.
The Chinese were likely the first people to tackle the main challenges of boat building and, in their own way, develop the art of navigation, which has remained consistent for thousands of years. They seem to have used leeboard and centerboard designs in their junks and sampans and expanded their trade to India and beyond, centuries before any similar maritime ventures emerged in northern Europe.
As regards the practice of long boat racing on rivers or tidal waters the Chinese are easily antecedent in time to the rest of the world. On great festivals in certain places the Dragon boat race forms part of the ceremony. The Dragon boats are just over 73 ft. long, with 4 ft. beam, and depth 21 in. The rowing or paddling space is about 63 ft. and the number of thwarts 27, thus giving exactly the same number of rowers as that of the Zygites in the Greek trireme. The two extremities of the boat are much cambered and rise to about 2 ft. above the water. At about 15 ft. from each end the single plank gives place to three, so as to offer a concave surface to the water. The paddle blade is spade-like in form and about 6½ in. broad.
When it comes to long boat racing on rivers or tidal waters, the Chinese were way ahead of the rest of the world. During major festivals in some locations, the Dragon boat race is part of the celebration. Dragon boats are just over 73 feet long, with a beam of 4 feet and a depth of 21 inches. The rowing or paddling area is about 63 feet long, with 27 seats for rowers, matching the number of oarsmen in the Zygites of a Greek trireme. The ends of the boat are highly curved and rise about 2 feet above the water. About 15 feet from each end, the single plank is replaced by three planks to create a concave surface for the water. The paddle blade is shaped like a spade and is approximately 6.5 inches wide.
Both in Siam and Burma there is a very large river population, and boat racing is on festival days a common amusement. The typical craft, however, is the Duck-boat, which in the shape of hull is in direct contrast to the dug-out form, and primarily intended for sailing. It is interesting to note that the Siamese method of slinging and using quarter rudders is the oldest used by men in sailing craft, being in fact the earliest development from the simple paddle rudder, which has in all ages been the first method of steering boats. The king of Siam’s state barge, we are told, is steered by long paddles, precisely in the same way as is figured in the case of the Egyptian boats of the 3rd dynasty (6000 B.C.). On the other hand the slung quarter rudders are the same in fashion as those used by Roman and Greek merchantmen, by Norsemen and Anglo-Saxons, and by medieval seamen down to about the 14th century.
Both in Thailand and Myanmar, there is a large population dependent on rivers, and boat racing is a popular activity during festivals. The typical boat is the Duck-boat, which has a hull shape that contrasts sharply with the dug-out form and is designed primarily for sailing. Interestingly, the Siamese technique of using quarter rudders is the oldest method employed by sailors, representing an early evolution from the simple paddle rudder, which has been the main steering method for boats throughout history. It's said that the king of Thailand’s state barge is steered using long paddles, just like the Egyptian boats from the 3rd dynasty (6000 BCE). In contrast, the quarter rudders are similar in design to those used by Roman and Greek merchant ships, Norsemen, Anglo-Saxons, and medieval sailors until around the 14th century.
The Malays have generally the credit of being expert boat-builders, but the local conditions are not such as to favour the construction of a good type of boat. “Small displacement, hollow lines, V-shaped sections, shallow draught and lack of beam” result in want of stability and weatherliness. But it is among them that the ancient process of dug-out building still survives and flourishes, preserving all the primitive and ingenious methods of hollowing the tree trunk, of forcing its sides outwards, and in many cases building them up with added planks, so that from the dug-out a regular boat is formed, with increased though limited carrying power, increased though still hardly sufficient stability.
The Malays are typically recognized as skilled boat builders, but the local conditions don’t really support the creation of a good boat type. “Small displacement, hollow lines, V-shaped sections, shallow draft, and narrow beam” lead to issues with stability and seaworthiness. However, they still practice the ancient method of dug-out construction, keeping alive all the basic and clever techniques for hollowing out a tree trunk, pushing the sides outward, and often adding planks to create a proper boat from the dug-out, which increases its carrying capacity and provides some added, though still limited, stability.
To ensure this last very necessary quality many devices and contrivances are resorted to.
To make sure this last essential quality is achieved, many tools and techniques are used.
In some cases (just as Ulysses is described as doing by Homer, Od. v. 256) the boatman fastens bundles of reeds or of bamboos all along the sides of his boat. These being very buoyant not only act as a defence against the wash of the waves, but are sufficient to keep the boat afloat in any sea.
In some cases (just as Ulysses is described as doing by Homer, Od. v. 256), the boatman attaches bundles of reeds or bamboo along the sides of his boat. These are very buoyant and not only serve as protection against the waves, but are enough to keep the boat afloat in any sea.
But the most characteristic device is the outrigger, a piece of floating wood sharpened at both ends, which is fixed parallel to the longer axis of the boat, at a distance of two or three beams, by two or more poles laid at right angles to it. This, while not interfering materially with the speed of the boat, acts as a counterpoise to any pressure on it which would tend, owing to its lack of stability, to upset it, and makes it possible for the long narrow dug-out to face even the open sea. It is remarkable that this invention, which must have been seen by the Egyptians and Phoenicians in very early times, was not introduced by them into the Mediterranean. Possibly this was owing to the lack of large timber suitable for dug-outs, and the consequent evolution by them of boat from raft, with sufficient beam to rely upon for stability.
But the most distinctive feature is the outrigger, a piece of floating wood sharpened at both ends, which is attached parallel to the longer side of the boat, about two or three beams away, using two or more poles laid perpendicular to it. This design, while not significantly slowing down the boat, serves as a counterweight to any pressure that might tip it over due to its instability, allowing the long, narrow dugout to navigate even the open sea. It's interesting that this invention, which must have been observed by the Egyptians and Phoenicians in ancient times, was never adopted by them in the Mediterranean. This might be because there wasn't enough large timber suitable for dugouts, leading them to develop boats from rafts that had enough width to ensure stability.
On the other hand in the boats of India the influence of Egyptian and Arab types of build is apparent, and the dinghy of the Hugli is cited as being in form strangely like the ancient Egyptian model still preserved in the Ghizeh museum. Coming westward the dominant type of build is that of the Arab dhow, the boat class of which has all the characteristics of the larger vessel developed from it, plenty of beam, overhanging stem and transom stern. The planking of the shell over the wooden frame has a double thickness which conduces to dryness and durability in the craft.
On the other hand, the boats of India show clear influences from Egyptian and Arab designs. The dinghy from the Hugli River is noted for its shape, which closely resembles the ancient Egyptian model still displayed in the Giza museum. Moving westward, the main boat design is that of the Arab dhow, which has all the features of the larger vessels that evolved from it, including a wide beam, an overhanging bow, and a flat stern. The planking over the wooden frame is double-thick, which helps keep the boat dry and durable.
On the Nile it is interesting to find the naggar preserving, in its construction out of blocks of acacia wood pinned together, the old-world fashion of building described by Herodotus. The gaiassa and dahabiah are too large to be classed as boats, but they and their smaller sisters follow the Arab type in build and rig.
On the Nile, it's fascinating to see the naggar still using the traditional method of construction with blocks of acacia wood pinned together, just like Herodotus described. The gaiassa and dahabiah are too big to be considered boats, but they, along with their smaller counterparts, are built and rigged in the Arab style.
It is noteworthy that nothing apparently of the ancient Egyptian or classical methods of build survives in the Mediterranean, while the records of the development of boat-building in the middle ages are meagre and confusing. The best illustrations of ancient methods of construction, and of ancient seamanship, are to be found, if anywhere, in the East, that conservative storehouse of types and fashions, to which they were either communicated, or from which they were borrowed, by Egyptians or Phoenicians, from whom they were afterwards copied by Greeks and Romans.
It’s interesting that not much of the ancient Egyptian or classical building methods remains in the Mediterranean, and the records of how boat-building evolved in the Middle Ages are limited and unclear. The best examples of ancient construction techniques and seamanship can be found, if at all, in the East, that traditional reservoir of styles and trends, which the Egyptians or Phoenicians either learned from or borrowed, and which the Greeks and Romans later replicated.
In the Mediterranean the chief characteristics of the types belonging to it are “carvel-build, high bow, round stern and deep rudder hung on stern post outside the vessel.”
In the Mediterranean, the main features of the types that belong to it are "carvel-built, high bow, round stern, and a deep rudder attached to the stern post outside the vessel."
In the eastern basin the long-bowed wide-sterned caique of the Bosporus is perhaps the type of boat best known, but both Greek and Italian waters abound with an unnumbered variety of boats of “beautiful lines and great carrying power.” In the Adriatic, the Venetian gondola, and the light craft generally, are of the type developed from the raft, flat-bottomed, and capable of navigating shallow waters with minimum of draught and maximum of load.
In the eastern basin, the long-bowed, wide-sterned caique of the Bosporus is probably the most recognized type of boat, but both Greek and Italian waters have countless varieties of boats with “beautiful lines and great carrying capacity.” In the Adriatic, the Venetian gondola and other light vessels are developed from the raft design—flat-bottomed and able to navigate shallow waters with a minimal draft while maximizing load.
In the western basin the majority of the smaller vessels are of the sharp-sterned build. Upon the boats of the felucca class, long vessels with easy lines and low free-board, suitable for rowing as well as sailing, the influence of the long galley of the middle ages was apparent. In Genoese waters at the beginning of the 19th century there were single-decked rowing vessels, which preserved the name of galley, and were said to be the descendants of the Liburnians that defeated the many-banked vessels of Antonius at Actium. But the introduction of steam vessels has already relegated into obscurity these memorials of the past.
In the western basin, most of the smaller boats are built with sharp sterns. The boats of the felucca class are long, with smooth lines and low sides, making them good for both rowing and sailing. You can see the influence of the long medieval galleys in their design. In the Genoese waters at the start of the 19th century, there were single-decked rowing boats known as galleys, believed to be descendants of the Liburnians who defeated Antonius's multi-banked vessels at Actium. However, the rise of steam-powered boats has already pushed these reminders of the past into obscurity.
Along the Riviera and the Spanish coast a type of boat is noticeable which is peculiar for the inward curve of both stem and stern from a keel which has considerable camber, enabling them to be beached in a heavy surf.
Along the Riviera and the Spanish coast, there's a type of boat that stands out because of the inward curve of both the bow and the stern, along with a keel that has a significant curve, making it possible to land on a beach even in rough surf.
On the Douro, in Portugal, it is said that the boats which may be seen laden with casks of wine, trailing behind them an enormously long steering paddle, are of Phoenician ancestry, and that the curious signs, which many of them have painted on the cross board over the cabin, are of Semitic origin though now undecipherable.
On the Douro River in Portugal, it’s said that the boats loaded with barrels of wine, featuring an extremely long steering paddle trailing behind, are of Phoenician heritage. It’s also noted that the strange symbols painted on the cross board above the cabin are of Semitic origin, although they are now impossible to decipher.
Coming to the northern waters, as with men, so with boats, we meet with a totally different type. Instead of the smooth exterior of the carvel-build, we have the more rugged form of clinker-built craft with great beam, and raking sterns and stems, and a wide flare forward. In the most northern waters the strakes of the sea-going boats are wide and of considerable thickness, of oak or fir, often compacted with wooden trenails, strong and fit to do battle with the rough seas and rough usage which they have to endure.
Arriving in the northern waters, just like with people, we encounter a completely different kind of boat. Instead of the sleek surface of the carvel-built vessels, we find the sturdier design of clinker-built boats, which have a wide beam, sloping sterns and bows, and a noticeable flare towards the front. In the northernmost waters, the planks of the ocean-going boats are wide and fairly thick, made from oak or fir, often reinforced with wooden dowels, tough enough to withstand the rough seas and harsh conditions they face.
In most of these the origin of form and character is to be sought for in the old Viking vessels or long keeles of the 5th century A.D., with curved and elevated stem and stern posts, and without decks or, at the most, half decked.
In many of these, the source of form and character can be traced back to the old Viking ships or long keeles of the 5th century CE, featuring curved and raised bow and stern posts, and lacking decks or, at most, only partially decked.
In the Baltic and the North Sea most of the fishing boats follow this type, with, however, considerable variety in details. It is noticeable that here also, as in other parts of the world, and at other times, the pressing demand for speed and carrying power 99 has increased the size in almost all classes of boats till they pass into the category of ships. At the same time the carvel-build is becoming more common, while, in the struggle for life, steam and motor power are threatening to obliterate the old types of rowing and sailing boats altogether.
In the Baltic and the North Sea, most fishing boats fit this type, though there’s quite a bit of variety in the details. It’s noticeable that here, like in other parts of the world and at different times, the strong demand for speed and carrying capacity 99 has led to the size of almost all types of boats increasing until they cross into the category of ships. At the same time, carvel construction is becoming more popular, while steam and motor power are threatening to wipe out the traditional types of rowing and sailing boats altogether.
Next to the Norse skiff and its descendants, perhaps the oldest type of boat in northern waters is to be found in Holland, where the conditions of navigation have hardly altered for centuries. It is to the Dutch that we chiefly owe the original of our pleasure craft, but, though we have developed these enormously, the Dutch boats have remained pretty much the same. The clinker-build and the wide rounded bow are now very much of the same character as they are represented in the old pictures of the 17th and 18th centuries.
Next to the Norse skiff and its descendants, one of the oldest types of boats in northern waters can be found in Holland, where navigation conditions have hardly changed for centuries. The original design of our pleasure boats mainly comes from the Dutch, but while we've made significant advancements, Dutch boats have stayed quite similar. The clinker-built structure and the wide, rounded bow still closely resemble how they were depicted in old paintings from the 17th and 18th centuries.
The development of boat-building in the British Isles during the 19th century has been unceasing and would need a treatise to itself to do it justice. The expansion of the fishing industry and the pressure of competition have stimulated constant improvement in the craft engaged, and here also are observable the same tendencies to substitute carvel, though it is more expensive, for clinker build, and to increase the length and size of the boats, and the gradual supersession of sail and oar by steam power. Under these influences we hear of the fifie and the skaffie classes, old favourites in northern waters, being superseded by the more modern Zulu, which is supposed to unite the good qualities of both; and these in turn running to such a size as to take them outside the category of boats. But even in the case of smaller boats the Zulu model is widely followed, so that they have actually been imported to the Irish coast for the use of the crofter fishermen in the congested districts.
The growth of boat-building in the British Isles during the 19th century has been ongoing and would require an entire book to cover properly. The increase in the fishing industry and the pressure of competition have led to constant improvements in the craft, and you can also see similar trends toward using carvel construction, even though it’s pricier, instead of clinker build, as well as a rise in the length and size of boats, and a gradual replacement of sails and oars with steam power. Because of these changes, we’ve seen the fifie and skaffie classes, once popular in northern waters, being replaced by the more modern Zulu, which is thought to combine the best features of both; and these, in turn, are growing so large that they no longer fit the definition of boats. But even with smaller boats, the Zulu design is widely adopted, to the point that they have even been imported to the Irish coast for use by the crofter fishermen in crowded areas.
For the Shetland sexern and the broad boats of the Orkneys, and the nabbies of the west coast of Scotland, the curious will do well to refer to H. Warington Smyth’s most excellent account.
For the Shetland sexern and the wide boats of the Orkneys, and the nabbies of the west coast of Scotland, those interested should check out H. Warington Smyth’s outstanding account.
On the eastern coast of England the influence of the Dutch type of build is manifest in many of the flat-bottomed and mostly round-ended craft, such as the Yorkshire Billyboy, and partly in the coble, which latter is interesting as built for launching off beaches against heavy seas, and as containing relics of Norse influence, though in the main of Dutch origin.
On the east coast of England, the impact of Dutch-style boat design is evident in many flat-bottomed, mostly round-ended vessels, like the Yorkshire Billyboy, and to some extent in the coble. The coble is particularly interesting because it was designed for launching off beaches in rough seas and holds traces of Norse influence, although it is primarily of Dutch origin.
The life-boats of the eastern coast are in themselves an admirable class of boat, with fine lines, great length, and shallow draught, wonderful in their daring work in foul weather and heavy seas, in which as a rule their services are required. Here, however, as in the fishing boats, the size is increasing, and steam is appropriating to itself the provinces of the sail and the oar.
The lifeboats on the eastern coast are a remarkable type of boat, featuring sleek designs, great length, and a shallow draft, excelling in their brave work during bad weather and rough seas, where they're typically needed. However, similar to fishing boats, they are getting larger in size, and steam is taking over the roles of sails and oars.
The wherry of the Norfolk Broads has a type of its own, and is often fitted out as a pleasure boat. It is safe and comfortable for inland waters, but not the sort of boat to live in a sea-way in anything but good weather.
The wherry from the Norfolk Broads is unique and often designed as a leisure boat. It's safe and comfortable for inland waters, but it's not the kind of boat you'd want to be in at sea unless the weather is good.
The Thames and its estuary rejoice in a great variety of boats, of which the old Peter boat (so called after the legend of the foundation of the abbey on Thorney Island) preserved a very ancient type of build, shorter and broader than the old Thames pleasure wherry. But these and the old hatch boat have now almost disappeared. Possibly survivors may still be seen on the upper part of the tidal river. Round the English coast from the mouth of the Thames southwards the conditions of landing and of hauling up boats above high-water mark affect the type, demanding strong clinker-build and stout timbers. Hence there is a strong family resemblance in most of the short boats in use from the North Foreland round to Brighton. Among these are the life-boats of Deal and the other Channel ports, which have done and are still doing heroic work in saving life from wrecks upon the Goodwins and the other dangerous shoals that beset the narrowing sleeve of the English Channel.
The Thames and its estuary are home to a wide variety of boats, including the old Peter boat (named after the legend of the abbey's founding on Thorney Island), which represents an ancient design, shorter and broader than the traditional Thames pleasure wherry. However, these and the old hatch boat have nearly vanished. You might still catch a glimpse of some on the upper part of the tidal river. Along the English coast from the mouth of the Thames southward, the conditions for landing and pulling boats above the high-water mark influence the design, requiring strong clinker construction and sturdy timbers. As a result, there's a noticeable similarity among most of the short boats used from the North Foreland to Brighton. This includes the lifeboats from Deal and other Channel ports, which have performed and continue to perform heroic work in saving lives from wrecks on the Goodwins and the other perilous shoals that threaten the narrowing stretch of the English Channel.
Farther down, along the southern coast, and to the west, where harbours are more frequent, a finer and deeper class of boats, chiefly of carvel-build, is to be found. The Cornish ports are the home of a great boat-building industry, and from them a large number of the finest fishing boats in the world are turned out annually. Most of them are built with stem and stern alike, with full and bold quarters, and ample floor.
Farther down the southern coast, to the west, where there are more harbors, you'll find a better and deeper class of boats, mostly built using the carvel method. The ports in Cornwall are home to a thriving boat-building industry, and they produce a significant number of the finest fishing boats in the world each year. Most of these boats are built with identical stems and sterns, featuring full, bold quarters and plenty of space in the hull.
It is not possible here to enumerate, much less to describe in detail, the variety of types in sea-going boats which have been elaborated in England and in America. For this purpose reference should be made to the list of works given at the end of the article.
It’s not possible to list, let alone describe in detail, the different types of sea-going boats developed in England and America. For this, please refer to the list of works provided at the end of the article.
The following is a list of the boats at present used in the royal navy. They have all of them a deep fore foot, and with the exception of the whalers and Berthon boats, upright stems and transom sterns. The whalers have a raking stem and a sharp stern, and a certain amount of sheer in the bows.
The following is a list of the boats currently used in the royal navy. They all have a deep forefoot, and except for the whalers and Berthon boats, they have upright stems and transom sterns. The whalers have a slanted stem and a pointed stern, along with a bit of sheer in the bows.
Length. Feet. | Beam. Ft. In. | Depth. Ft. In. | |
1a. Dinghy. Freeboard about 9 in. Weight 3 cwt. 2 qr. Between thwarts 2 ft. 9 in. Elm. 1a. Dinghy. Freeboard about 9 inches. Weight 3 hundredweight, 2 quarters. Between thwarts 2 feet, 9 inches. Elm. | 13½ | 4′ 8″ | 2′ 2″ |
1b. Skiff dinghy for torpedo boats. Freeboard about 9 in. Carry about ten men in moderate weather. Between thwarts 2 ft. 7½ in. Weight 3 cwt. 4 ℔ Yellow pine. 1b. Skiff dinghy for torpedo boats. Freeboard about 9 in. Holds about ten men in mild weather. Between thwarts 2 ft. 7½ in. Weight 3 cwt. 4 ℔ Yellow pine. | 16 | 4′ 6″ | 1′ 10″ |
2a. Whaler for destroyers. 5 in. sheer. Yellow pine. 2a. Whaler for destroyers. 5-inch sheer. Yellow pine. | 25 | 5′ 6″ | 2′ |
2b. Whaler. Between thwarts 2 ft. 10 in. Freeboard about 12 in. Weight, 8 cwt. Strakes No. 13. Lap ¾ in. Elm. 2b. Whaler. Between thwarts 2 ft. 10 in. Freeboard about 12 in. Weight, 8 cwt. Strakes No. 13. Lap ¾ in. Elm. | 27 | 5′ 6″ | 2′ 2″ |
(All have bilge strakes with hand-holes.) | |||
3. Gig. Between thwarts 2 ft. 9½ in. Weight 8 cwt. 2 qr. 15 ℔ 13 Strakes. Elm. 3. Gig. Between thwarts 2 ft. 9½ in. Weight 8 cwt. 2 qr. 15 lb 13 Strakes. Elm. | 30 | 5′ 6″ | 2′ 2″ |
4. Cutter. Between thwarts 3 ft. 1 in. To carry 49 men. Carvel built. 4. Cutter. Between seats 3 ft. 1 in. To hold 49 men. Built with a carvel design. | 30 | 8′ 1″ | 2′ 8½″ |
5. Pinnace. Between thwarts 3 ft. Carvel-built. Elm. 5. Small boat. Between seats 3 ft. Built like a carvel. Made of elm. | 36 | 10′ 2″ | 3′ 5″ |
6. Launch. Between thwarts 3 ft. 1 in. To carry 140 men. Double skin diagonal. Teak. 6. Launch. Between thwarts 3 ft. 1 in. To carry 140 men. Double skin diagonal. Teak. | 42 | 11′ 6″ | 4′ 6″ |
7. Berthon collapsible boats weighing 7 cwt. for destroyers. 7. Berthon collapsible boats weighing 7 hundredweight for destroyers. |
With the exception of the larger classes, viz. cutters, pinnaces and launches, the V-shape of bottom is still preserved, which does not tend to stability, and it is difficult to see why the smaller classes have not followed the improvement made in their larger sisters.
Except for the larger classes, like cutters, pinnaces, and launches, the V-shaped bottom is still maintained, which doesn't promote stability. It's hard to understand why the smaller classes haven't adopted the improvements seen in their larger counterparts.
Though the number and variety of sea-going boats is of much greater importance, no account of boats in general would be complete without reference to the development of pleasure craft upon rivers and inland waters, especially in Pleasure boats and racing. England, during the past century. There is a legend, dating from Saxon times, which tells of King Edgar the Peaceable being rowed on the Dee from his palace in Chester to the church of St John, by eight kings, himself the ninth, steering this ancient 8-oar; but not much is heard of rowing in England until 1453, when John Norman, lord mayor of London, set the example of going by water to Westminster, which, we are told, made him popular with the watermen of his day, as in consequence the use of pleasure boats by the citizens became common. Thus it was that the old Thames pleasure wherry, with its high bows and low sharp stern and V-shaped section, and the old skiff came into vogue, both of which have now given way to boats, mostly of clinker-build, but with rounder bottoms and greater depth, safer and more comfortable to row in.
While the number and variety of sea-going boats are much more significant, no discussion of boats in general would be complete without mentioning the rise of pleasure craft on rivers and inland waters, especially in Pleasure boats and racing. England over the past century. There's a legend from Saxon times about King Edgar the Peaceable being rowed on the Dee River from his palace in Chester to the church of St. John by eight kings, with him being the ninth, steering this ancient eight-oared boat; however, rowing in England didn't become prominent until 1453 when John Norman, the lord mayor of London, set the trend of traveling by water to Westminster. This made him popular with the watermen of his time, and as a result, using pleasure boats became common among the citizens. Thus, the old Thames pleasure wherry, with its high bows and low sharp stern and V-shaped design, along with the old skiff, became fashionable, both of which have now been replaced by mostly clinker-built boats that feature rounder bottoms and greater depth, making them safer and more comfortable to row.
In 1715 Thomas Doggett (q.v.) founded a race which is still rowed in peculiar sculling boats, straked, and with sides flaring up to the sill of the rowlock. Strutt tells us of a regatta in 1775 in which watermen contended in pair-oared boats or skiffs.
In 1715, Thomas Doggett (q.v.) started a race that is still held today using unique sculling boats that are designed with flared sides up to the rowlock. Strutt mentions a regatta in 1775 where watermen competed in pair-oared boats or skiffs.
At the beginning of the 19th century numerous rowing clubs flourished on the upper tidal waters of the Thames, and we hear of four-oared races from Westminster to Putney, and from Putney to Kew, in what we should now consider large and heavy boats, clinker-built, with bluff entry.
At the start of the 19th century, many rowing clubs thrived on the upper tidal waters of the Thames. We hear about four-oared races from Westminster to Putney and from Putney to Kew, using what we would now think of as large and heavy boats, clinker-built, with a blunt entry.
Longer boats, 8-oars, and 10-oars, seem to have been existent at the end of the 18th century. Eton certainly had one 10-oar, and three 8-oars, and two 6-oars, before 1811. The record of 8-oar races at Oxford begins in 1815, at Cambridge in 100 1827. Pair-oar and sculling races in lighter boats seem to have come in soon after 1820, and the first Oxford and Cambridge eight-oared race was rowed in 1829, in which year also Eton and Westminster contended at Putney.
Longer boats, with 8 and 10 oars, appeared at the end of the 18th century. Eton definitely had one 10-oar, three 8-oars, and two 6-oars before 1811. The record of 8-oar races at Oxford starts in 1815, while at Cambridge it begins in 1827. Pair-oar and sculling races in lighter boats seemed to emerge soon after 1820, and the first Oxford and Cambridge eight-oared race took place in 1829, the same year that Eton and Westminster competed at Putney.
Henley regatta was founded in 1839, and since that date the building of racing boats, eights, fours, pairs, and sculling boats, has made great progress. The products of the present time are such, in lightness of build and swiftness of propulsion, as would have been thought impossible between 1810 and 1830.
Henley regatta was founded in 1839, and since then, the construction of racing boats—eights, fours, pairs, and sculling boats—has advanced significantly. Today's boats are so light and fast that they would have seemed impossible between 1810 and 1830.
In the middle of the 19th century the long boats in use were mostly clinker-built with a keel. At Oxford the torpids were rowed, as now, in clinker-built craft, but the summer races were rowed in carvel-built boats, which also had a keel.
In the mid-19th century, the long boats that were commonly used were mostly clinker-built with a keel. At Oxford, the torpids were still rowed, just like today, in clinker-built boats, but the summer races were held in carvel-built boats, which also had a keel.
In 1855 the first keelless 8-oar made its appearance at Henley, built by Mat Taylor for the Royal Chester Rowing Club. The new type was constructed on moulds, bottom upwards, a cedar skin bent and fitted on to the moulds, and the ribs built in after the boat had been turned over.
In 1855, the first keelless 8-oar debuted at Henley, built by Mat Taylor for the Royal Chester Rowing Club. This new type was made using molds positioned bottom up, with a cedar skin shaped and attached to the molds, and the ribs added in after the boat was flipped over.
In 1857 Oxford rowed in a similar boat at Putney, 55 ft. long, 25 in. beam. From that time the keelless racing boat has held its own, fours and pairs and sculling boats all following suit. But with the introduction of sliding seats racing eights have developed in length to 63 ft. or more, with considerable camber, and a beam of 23-24 in. There are, however, still advocates of the shorter type with broader beam, and it is noticeable that the Belgian boat that won the Grand Challenge at Henley in 1906 did not exceed 60 ft. The boat in which Oxford won the University race in 1901 was 56 ft. long with 27 in. of beam.
In 1857, Oxford used a similar boat at Putney, measuring 55 ft. long and 25 in. wide. Since then, keelless racing boats have become standard, with fours, pairs, and sculling boats following the trend. However, with the introduction of sliding seats, racing eights have grown longer, reaching 63 ft. or more, with a significant camber and a beam of 23-24 in. That said, there are still supporters of the shorter type with a wider beam. It's worth noting that the Belgian boat that won the Grand Challenge at Henley in 1906 was no longer than 60 ft. The boat in which Oxford won the University race in 1901 was 56 ft. long and had a beam of 27 in.
In sculling boats the acceptance of the Australian type of build has led to the construction of a much shorter boat with broader beam than that which was in vogue twenty years ago. The same tendency has not shown itself so pronouncedly in pair oars, but will no doubt be manifest in time as the build improves. In fact we may expect the controversy between long and short racing boats, and the proper method of propelling them respectively, to be carried a step farther. The tendency, with the long slide, and long type of boat, is to try to avoid “pinch” by adopting the scullers’ method of easy beginning, and strong drive with the legs, and sharp finish to follow, but it remains to be seen whether superior pace is not to be obtained in a shorter boat by sharp beginning at a reasonable angle to the boat’s side, and a continuous drive right out to the finish of the stroke.
In sculling boats, using the Australian design has led to shorter boats with a wider beam compared to those popular twenty years ago. This trend hasn't been as noticeable in pair oars, but it will likely emerge as designs improve. We can expect the debate between long and short racing boats, and the best methods for propelling them, to advance further. The trend with longer slides and boat designs is to try to avoid "pinch" by adopting the scullers' approach of a gentle start, powerful leg drive, and a sharp finish. However, it remains to be seen whether a shorter boat can achieve superior speed through a sharp start at a reasonable angle to the boat's side and a continuous drive all the way to the finish of the stroke.
Appended is a list of pleasure boats in use (1909) on the Thames, with their measurements (in feet and inches).
Appended is a list of pleasure boats in use (1909) on the Thames, with their measurements (in feet and inches).
Class of Boat. | Length. | Beam. | Depth. |
Racing eight | 56′ to 63′ | 23″ to 27″ | 9″ to 10″ |
Clinker eight | 56′ to 60′ | 24″ to 27″ | 9″ to 10″ |
Clinker four | 38′ to 42′ | 23″ to 24″ | 8″ to 9″ |
Tub fours | 30′ to 32′ | 3′8″-3′10″ | 13″ from keel to top of stem |
Outrigger pair | 30′ to 34′ | 14″ to 16″ | 7″ to 8″ |
Outrigger sculls | 25′ to 30′ | 10″ to 13″ | 5½” to 6″ |
Coaching gigs | 26′ to 28′ | 3′ to 3′4″ | 10½” to 14″ |
Skiffs (Thames) | 24′ to 26′ | 3′9″ to 4′ | 12″ |
Skiffs (Eton) | 27′ | 2′3″ | 9½” |
Gigs (pleasure) | 24′ to 36′ | 4′ | 15″ to 16″ |
Randans | 27′ to 30′ | 4′ to 4′6″ | 13″ from keel to top of stem |
Whiffs | 20′ to 23′ | 1′4″ to 1′6″ | 6″ from keel to top of stem |
Whiff Gigs | 19′ to 20′ | 2′8″ to 2′10″ | 12″ over all |
Punts racers | 30′ to 34′ | 1′3″ to 1′6″ | 6″ to 7″ |
” semi racers | 28′ to 30′ | 2′ | 9″ to 10½” |
” pleasure | 26′ to 28′ | 2′9″ to 3′ | 12″ to 13″ |
Authorities.—For ancient boats: Dict. Ant., “Navis”; C. Torr, Ancient Ships; Smith, Voyage and Shipwreck of St Paul; Graser, De re navali; Breusing, Die Nautik der Alten; Contre-amiral Serre, La Marine des anciens; Jules Var, L’Art nautique dans l’antiquité. Medieval: Jal, Archéologie navale, and Glossaire nautique; Marquis de Folin, Bateaux et navires, progrès de la construction navale; W.S. Lindsay, History of Merchant Shipping and Ancient Commerce. Modern: H. Warington Smyth, Mast and Sail in Europe and Asia; Dixon Kempe, Manual of Yacht and Boat Sailing; H.C. Folkhard, The Sailing Boat; F.G. Aflato, The Sea Fishing Industry of England and Wales; R.C. Leslie, Old Sea Wings, &c.
Authorities.—For ancient boats: Dict. Ant., “Navis”; C. Torr, Ancient Ships; Smith, Voyage and Shipwreck of St Paul; Graser, De re navali; Breusing, Die Nautik der Alten; Contre-amiral Serre, La Marine des anciens; Jules Var, L’Art nautique dans l’antiquité. Medieval: Jal, Archéologie navale, and Glossaire nautique; Marquis de Folin, Bateaux et navires, progrès de la construction navale; W.S. Lindsay, History of Merchant Shipping and Ancient Commerce. Modern: H. Warington Smyth, Mast and Sail in Europe and Asia; Dixon Kempe, Manual of Yacht and Boat Sailing; H.C. Folkhard, The Sailing Boat; F.G. Aflato, The Sea Fishing Industry of England and Wales; R.C. Leslie, Old Sea Wings, &c.
BOATSWAIN (pronounced “bo’sun”; derived from “boat” and “swain,” a servant), the warrant officer of the navy who in sailing-ships had particular charge of the boats, sails, rigging, colours, anchors and cordage. He superintended the rigging of the ship in dock, and it was his duty to summon the crew to work by a whistle. The office still remains, though with functions modified by the introduction of steam. In a merchant ship the boatswain is the foreman of the crew and is sometimes also third or fourth mate.
BOATSWAIN (pronounced “bo’sun”; coming from “boat” and “swain,” which means servant) is a warrant officer in the navy who, on sailing ships, was specifically in charge of the boats, sails, rigging, flags, anchors, and ropes. He oversaw the rigging of the ship while it was in dock and was responsible for calling the crew to work with a whistle. The position still exists today, although its duties have changed with the advent of steam power. On a merchant ship, the boatswain acts as the foreman of the crew and may also hold the position of third or fourth mate.
The attack on the fort at Bobbili made by General Bussy in 1756 is one of the most memorable episodes in Indian history. There was a constant feud between the chief of Bobbili and the raja of Vizianagram; and when Bussy marched to restore order the raja persuaded him that the fault lay with the chief of Bobbili and joined the French with 11,000 men against his rival. In spite of the fact that the French field-pieces at once made practicable breaches in the mud walls of the fort, the defenders held out with desperate valour. Two assaults were repulsed after hours of hand-to-hand fighting; and when, after a fresh bombardment, the garrison saw that their case was hopeless, they killed their women and children, and only succumbed at last to a third assault because every man of them was either killed or mortally wounded. An old man, however, crept out of a hut with a child, whom he presented to Bussy as the son of the dead chief. Three nights later four followers of the chief of Bobbili crept into the tent of the raja of Vizianagram and stabbed him to death. The child, Chinna Ranga Rao, was invested by Bussy with his father’s estate, but during his minority it was seized by his uncle. After a temporary arrangement of terms with the raja of Vizianagram the old feud broke out again, and the Bobbili chief was forced to take refuge in the nizam’s country. In 1794, however, on the break-up of the Vizianagram estate, Chinna Ranga Rao was restored by the British, and in 1801 a permanent settlement was made with his son. The title of raja was recognized as hereditary in the family; that of maharaja was conferred as a personal distinction on Sir Venkataswetachalapati Ranga Rao, K.C.I.E., the adopted great-great-grandson of Chinna Ranga Rao.
The attack on the fort at Bobbili led by General Bussy in 1756 is one of the most significant events in Indian history. There was an ongoing rivalry between the chief of Bobbili and the raja of Vizianagram; when Bussy arrived to restore order, the raja convinced him that the chief of Bobbili was at fault and allied with the French, bringing 11,000 men to fight against his rival. Despite the French artillery quickly creating breaches in the fort's mud walls, the defenders resisted fiercely. Two assaults were repelled after hours of close combat; and when the garrison realized their situation was hopeless after another bombardment, they killed their women and children. They ultimately fell to a third assault, as every defender was either killed or seriously wounded. However, an old man managed to crawl out of a hut with a child, whom he presented to Bussy as the son of the deceased chief. Three nights later, four followers of the Bobbili chief sneaked into the tent of the raja of Vizianagram and murdered him. The child, Chinna Ranga Rao, was given his father’s estate by Bussy, but his uncle seized it during his minority. After a temporary arrangement with the raja of Vizianagram, the old feud reignited, forcing the Bobbili chief to seek refuge in the nizam’s territory. In 1794, however, when the Vizianagram estate was broken up, the British restored Chinna Ranga Rao, and in 1801, a permanent settlement was arranged with his son. The title of raja was recognized as hereditary in the family; the title of maharaja was granted as a personal honor to Sir Venkataswetachalapati Ranga Rao, K.C.I.E., the adopted great-great-grandson of Chinna Ranga Rao.
For the siege see Imp. Gazetteer of India (Oxford, 1908), s.v. “Bobbili Estate.”
For the siege, see Imp. Gazetteer of India (Oxford, 1908), s.v. “Bobbili Estate.”
BOBBIO, a town and episcopal see of Lombardy, Italy, in the province of Pavia, 32½ m. S.W. of Piacenza by road. Pop. (1901) 4848. Its most important building is the church dedicated to St Columban, who became first abbot of Bobbio in 595 or 612, and died there in 615. It was erected in Lombard style in the 11th or 12th century (to which period the campanile belongs) and restored in the 13th. The cathedral is also interesting. Bobbio was especially famous for the manuscripts which belonged to the monastery of St Columban, and are now dispersed, the greater part being in the Vatican library at Rome, and others at Milan and Turin. The cathedral archives contain documents of the 10th and 11th centuries.
BOBBIO is a town and an episcopal see in Lombardy, Italy, located in the province of Pavia, 32½ miles southwest of Piacenza by road. Population (1901) was 4,848. The most notable building is the church dedicated to St. Columban, who became the first abbot of Bobbio in 595 or 612 and died there in 615. It was built in Lombard style in the 11th or 12th century (to which the campanile belongs) and was restored in the 13th century. The cathedral is also noteworthy. Bobbio was particularly famous for the manuscripts that belonged to the monastery of St. Columban, which are now scattered, with most stored in the Vatican library in Rome and others in Milan and Turin. The cathedral archives hold documents from the 10th and 11th centuries.
See M. Stokes, Six Months in the Apennines (London, 1892), 154 seq.; C. Cipolla, in L’Arte (1904), 241.
See M. Stokes, Six Months in the Apennines (London, 1892), 154 seq.; C. Cipolla, in L’Arte (1904), 241.
BOBER, a river of Germany, the most considerable of the left bank tributaries of the Oder; it rises at an altitude of 2440 ft., on the northern (Silesian) side of the Riesengebirge. In its upper course it traverses a higher plateau, whence, after passing the town of Landeshut, it descends through a narrow and fertile valley to Kupferberg. Here its romantic middle course begins, and after dashing through a deep ravine between the towns of Hirschberg and Löwenberg, it gains the plain. In its lower course it meanders through pleasant pastures, bogland and pine forests in succession, receives the waters of various mountain streams, passes close by Bunzlau and through Sagan, and finally, after a course of 160 m., joins the Oder at Crossen. Swollen by the melting of the winter snows and by heavy rains in the 101 mountains, it is frequently a torrent, and is thus, except in the last few miles, unnavigable for either boats or rafts.
BOBER, is a river in Germany, the largest of the left bank tributaries of the Oder. It begins at an elevation of 2,440 feet on the northern (Silesian) side of the Riesengebirge. In its upper section, it flows through a higher plateau, then after passing the town of Landeshut, it descends through a narrow and fertile valley to Kupferberg. Here begins its picturesque middle course, and after rushing through a deep gorge between the towns of Hirschberg and Löwenberg, it reaches the plain. In its lower section, it winds through lovely pastures, wetlands, and pine forests, collects water from various mountain streams, passes near Bunzlau and through Sagan, and finally, after traveling 160 kilometers, joins the Oder at Crossen. After heavy winter snowmelt and rainfall in the mountains, it often becomes a torrent, making it, except for the last few miles, impossible to navigate with boats or rafts.
BOBRUISK, a town and formerly a first-class fortress of Russia, in the government of Minsk, and 100 m. by rail S.E. of the town of Minsk, in 53° 15′ N. lat. and 28° 52′ E. long., on the right bank of the Berezina river, and on the railway from Libau and Vilna to Ekaterinoslav. Pop. (1860) 23,761; (1897) 35,177, of whom one-half were Jews. In the reign of Alexander I. there was erected here, at the confluence of the Bobruiska with the Berezina, nearly a mile from the town, a fort, which successfully withstood a bombardment by Napoleon in 1812, and was made equal to the best in Europe by the emperor Nicholas I. It was demolished in 1897, the defences being antiquated. The town has a military hospital and a departmental college. There are ironworks and flour-mills; and corn and timber are shipped to Libau. The town was half burnt down in 1902.
BOBRUISK, is a town that used to be a major fortress in Russia, located in the Minsk region, about 100 miles southeast of Minsk. It sits at 53° 15′ N. latitude and 28° 52′ E. longitude, on the right bank of the Berezina River, and on the railway connecting Libau and Vilna to Ekaterinoslav. The population was 23,761 in 1860 and grew to 35,177 by 1897, with about half of the residents being Jewish. During Alexander I's reign, a fort was built at the junction of the Bobruiska and Berezina rivers, nearly a mile from the town. This fort successfully resisted a bombardment by Napoleon in 1812 and was upgraded to be as strong as the best in Europe by Emperor Nicholas I. It was torn down in 1897 because its defenses had become outdated. The town has a military hospital and a departmental college, along with ironworks and flour mills; corn and timber are shipped to Libau. In 1902, the town suffered significant fire damage.
BOCAGE, MANUEL MARIA BARBOSA DE (1765-1805), Portuguese poet, was a native of Setubal. His father had held important judicial and administrative appointments, and his mother, from whom he took his last surname, was the daughter of a Portuguese vice-admiral of French birth who had fought at the battle of Matapan. Bocage began to make verses in infancy, and being somewhat of a prodigy grew up to be flattered, self-conscious and unstable. At the age of fourteen, he suddenly left school and joined the 7th infantry regiment; but tiring of garrison life at Setubal after two years, he decided to enter the navy. He proceeded to the royal marine academy in Lisbon, but instead of studying he pursued love adventures, and for the next five years burnt incense on many altars, while his retentive memory and extraordinary talent for improvisation gained him a host of admirers and turned his head. The Brazilian modinhas, little rhymed poems sung to a guitar at family parties, were then in great vogue, and Bocage added to his fame by writing a number of these, by his skill in extemporizing verses on a given theme, and by allegorical idyllic pieces, the subjects of which are similar to those of Watteau’s and Boucher’s pictures. In 1786 he was appointed guardamarinha in the Indian navy, and he reached Goa by way of Brazil in October. There he came into an ignorant society full of petty intrigue, where his particular talents found no scope to display themselves; the glamour of the East left him unmoved and the climate brought on a serious illness. In these circumstances he compared the heroic traditions of Portugal in Asia, which had induced him to leave home, with the reality, and wrote his satirical sonnets on “The Decadence of the Portuguese Empire in Asia,” and those addressed to Affonso de Albuquerque and D. João de Castro. The irritation caused by these satires, together with rivalries in love affairs, made it advisable for him to leave Goa, and early in 1789 he obtained the post of lieutenant of the infantry company at Damaun; but he promptly deserted and made his way to Macao, where he arrived in July-August. According to a modern tradition much of the Lusiads had been written there, and Bocage probably travelled to China under the influence of Camoens, to whose life and misfortunes he loved to compare his own. Though he escaped the penalty of his desertion, he had no resources and lived on friends, whose help enabled him to return to Lisbon in the middle of the following year.
BOCAGE, MANUEL MARIA BARBOSA DE (1765-1805), Portuguese poet, was born in Setubal. His father held significant judicial and administrative positions, and his mother, from whom he got his last name, was the daughter of a Portuguese vice-admiral of French descent who fought in the battle of Matapan. Bocage started writing poems as a child and, being somewhat of a prodigy, grew up to be flattered, self-conscious, and unstable. At fourteen, he abruptly left school and joined the 7th infantry regiment; however, after two years of garrison life in Setubal, he grew tired of it and decided to join the navy. He went to the royal marine academy in Lisbon, but instead of studying, he pursued romantic exploits, and for the next five years, he dedicated himself to many love affairs, all while his remarkable memory and talent for improvisation earned him many admirers and went to his head. The Brazilian modinhas, short rhymed poems sung to a guitar at family gatherings, were very popular at the time, and Bocage gained fame by writing several of these, showcasing his ability to improvise verses on various themes, as well as creating allegorical idyllic pieces similar to the subjects found in Watteau’s and Boucher’s paintings. In 1786, he was appointed guardamarinha in the Indian navy and arrived in Goa via Brazil in October. There, he found himself in an uninformed society filled with petty intrigues, where his unique talents had little opportunity to shine; the allure of the East did not impress him, and the climate led to a serious illness. In this situation, he compared the heroic traditions of Portugal in Asia, which had motivated him to leave home, with reality, and wrote his satirical sonnets on “The Decadence of the Portuguese Empire in Asia,” as well as those addressed to Affonso de Albuquerque and D. João de Castro. The irritation these satires caused, along with rivalries in romantic relationships, made it wise for him to leave Goa, and in early 1789, he secured a position as lieutenant of the infantry company in Damaun; however, he quickly deserted and made his way to Macao, arriving there in July-August. According to a modern tradition, much of the Lusiads was written in that region, and Bocage likely traveled to China under the influence of Camoens, whose life and misfortunes he often liked to compare to his own. Although he escaped the consequences of his desertion, he had no means and relied on friends, whose assistance allowed him to return to Lisbon in the middle of the following year.
Once back in Portugal he found his old popularity, and resumed his vagabond existence. The age was one of reaction against the Pombaline reforms, and the famous intendant of police, Manique, in his determination to keep out French revolutionary and atheistic propaganda, forbade the importation of foreign classics and the discussion of all liberal ideas. Hence the only vehicle of expression left was satire, which Bocage employed with an unsparing hand. His poverty compelled him to eat and sleep with friends like the turbulent friar José Agostinho de Macedo (q.v.), and he soon fell under suspicion with Manique. He became a member of the New Arcadia, a literary society founded in 1790, under the name of Elmano Sadino, but left it three years later. Though including in its ranks most of the poets of the time, the New Arcadia produced little of real merit, and before long its adherents became enemies and descended to an angry warfare of words. But Bocage’s reputation among the general public and with foreign travellers grew year by year. Beckford, the author of Vathek, for instance, describes him as “a pale, limber, odd-looking young man, the queerest but perhaps the most original of God’s poetical creatures. This strange and versatile character may be said to possess the true wand of enchantment which at the will of its master either animates or petrifies.” In 1797 enemies of Bocage belonging to the New Arcadia delated him to Manique, who on the pretext afforded by some anti-religious verses, the Epistola á Marilia, and by his loose life, arrested him when he was about to flee the country and lodged him in the Limoeiro, where he spent his thirty-second birthday. His sufferings induced him to a speedy recantation, and after much importuning of friends, he obtained his transfer in November from the state prison to that of the Inquisition, then a mild tribunal, and shortly afterwards recovered his liberty. He returned to his bohemian life and subsisted by writing empty Elogios Dramaticos for the theatres, printing volumes of verses and translating the didactic poems of Delille, Castel and others, some second-rate French plays and Ovid’s Metamorphoses. These resources and the help of brother Freemasons just enabled him to exist, and a purifying influence came into his life in the shape of a real affection for the two beautiful daughters of D. Antonio Bersane Leite, which drew from him verses of true feeling mixed with regrets for the past. He would have married the younger lady, D. Anna Perpetua (Analia), but excesses had ruined his health. In 1801 his poetical rivalry with Macedo became more acute and personal, and ended by drawing from Bocage a stinging extempore poem, Pena de Talião, which remains a monument to his powers of invective. In 1804 the malady from which he suffered increased, and the approach of death inspired some beautiful sonnets, including one directed to D. Maria (Marcia), elder sister of Analia, who visited and consoled him. He became reconciled to his enemies, and breathed his last on the 21st of December 1805. His end recalled that of Camoens, for he expired in poverty on the eve of the French invasion, while the singer of the Lusiads just failed to see the occupation of Portugal by the duke of Alva’s army. The gulf that divides the life and achievements of these two poets is accounted for, less by difference of talent and temperament than by their environment, and it gives an accurate measure of the decline of Portugal in the two centuries that separate 1580 from 1805.
Once he was back in Portugal, he regained his old popularity and returned to his wandering lifestyle. This was a time of backlash against the Pombaline reforms, and the notorious police chief, Manique, was determined to suppress any French revolutionary and atheistic ideas. He banned the import of foreign classics and discussions of liberal thoughts. As a result, the only way to express dissent was through satire, which Bocage wielded harshly. His poverty forced him to rely on friends like the fiery friar José Agostinho de Macedo (q.v.), and soon he found himself under suspicion from Manique. He joined the New Arcadia, a literary society established in 1790 under the name Elmano Sadino, but quit three years later. Despite having some of the best poets of the time in its ranks, the New Arcadia produced little of real worth, and its members soon turned against each other, engaging in bitter word wars. Nonetheless, Bocage's reputation among the general public and foreign travelers grew year after year. Beckford, the author of Vathek, described him as “a pale, flexible, odd-looking young man, the quirkiest yet perhaps the most original of God’s poetic creations. This strange and adaptable character wields the true wand of enchantment, animating or petrifying at its master’s will.” In 1797, Bocage's enemies from the New Arcadia reported him to Manique, who, using some anti-religious poems, specifically the Epistola á Marilia, and Bocage's reckless lifestyle as an excuse, arrested him just as he was about to flee the country and imprisoned him in the Limoeiro, where he spent his thirty-second birthday. His suffering led him to quickly change his stance, and after persistent pleas from friends, he was transferred in November from the state prison to the Inquisition, which was then a gentler tribunal, and shortly afterwards regained his freedom. He returned to his bohemian lifestyle, making a living by writing mundane Elogios Dramaticos for theaters, publishing volumes of poetry, and translating the instructional poems of Delille, Castel, and others, along with some mediocre French plays and Ovid’s Metamorphoses. These sources of income, along with help from fellow Freemasons, barely allowed him to survive, but a redeeming influence entered his life in the form of real affection for the two beautiful daughters of D. Antonio Bersane Leite, which inspired him to write genuinely heartfelt verses filled with nostalgia for the past. He intended to marry the younger daughter, D. Anna Perpetua (Analia), but his excesses had damaged his health. In 1801, his poetic rivalry with Macedo intensified and became more personal, culminating in a sharp extemporaneous poem, Pena de Talião, which stands as a testament to his incisive invective skills. By 1804, his illness worsened, and as death approached, it inspired him to write some beautiful sonnets, including one addressed to D. Maria (Marcia), the elder sister of Analia, who came to comfort him. He reconciled with his adversaries and passed away on December 21, 1805. His death was reminiscent of Camoens, as he died in poverty just before the French invasion, while the creator of the Lusiads barely missed witnessing the occupation of Portugal by the Duke of Alva's army. The vast gulf between the lives and accomplishments of these two poets can be attributed, less to differences in talent and spirit and more to their circumstances, highlighting the decline of Portugal over the two centuries from 1580 to 1805.
To Beckford, Bocage was “a powerful genius,” and Link was struck by his nervous expression, harmonious versification and the fire of his poetry. He employed every variety of lyric and made his mark in all. His roundels are good, his epigrams witty, his satires rigorous and searching, his odes often full of nobility, but his fame must rest on his sonnets, which almost rival those of Camoens in power, elevation of thought and tender melancholy, though they lack the latter’s scholarly refinement of phrasing. So dazzled were contemporary critics by his brilliant and inspired extemporizations that they ignored Bocage’s licentiousness, and overlooked the slightness of his creative output and the artificial character of most of his poetry. In 1871 a monument was erected to the poet in the chief square of Setubal, and the centenary of his death was kept there with much circumstance in 1905.
To Beckford, Bocage was “a powerful genius,” and Link was struck by his intense expression, harmonious verse, and the passion in his poetry. He used every kind of lyric and made his mark in all of them. His roundels are good, his epigrams are witty, his satires are rigorous and probing, and his odes are often filled with nobility, but his fame should rest on his sonnets, which nearly rival those of Camoens in strength, depth of thought, and tender melancholy, even though they lack the latter’s academic polish in phrasing. Contemporary critics were so dazzled by his brilliant and inspired improvisations that they overlooked Bocage’s licentiousness and the limited nature of his creative output, as well as the artificial quality of most of his poetry. In 1871, a monument was erected in his honor in the main square of Setubal, and the centenary of his death was commemorated there with much ceremony in 1905.
The best editions of his collected works are those of I.F. da Silva, with a biographical and literary study by Rebello da Silva, in 6 vols. (Lisbon, 1853), and of Dr Theophilo Braga, in 8 vols. (Oporto, 1875-1876). See also I.F. da Silva Diccionario Bibliographico Portuguez, vol. vi. pp. 45-53, and vol. xvi. pp. 260-264; Dr T. Braga, Bocage, sua vida e epoca litteraria (Oporto, 1902). A striking portrait of Bocage by H.J. da Silva was engraved by Bartolozzi, who spent his last years in Lisbon.
The best editions of his collected works are by I.F. da Silva, which includes a biographical and literary study by Rebello da Silva, in 6 volumes (Lisbon, 1853), and by Dr. Theophilo Braga, in 8 volumes (Oporto, 1875-1876). Also, see I.F. da Silva's Diccionario Bibliographico Portuguez, vol. vi, pp. 45-53, and vol. xvi, pp. 260-264; Dr. T. Braga, Bocage, sua vida e epoca litteraria (Oporto, 1902). A notable portrait of Bocage by H.J. da Silva was engraved by Bartolozzi, who spent his final years in Lisbon.
BOCAGE (from O. Fr. boscage, Late Lat. boscum, a wood), a French topographical term applied to several regions of France, the commonest characteristics of which are a granite formation and an undulating or hilly surface, consisting largely of heath or reclaimed land, and dotted with clumps of trees. The most important districts designated by the word are (1) the Bocage of Normandy, which comprises portions of the 102 departments of Calvados, Manche and Orne; (2) the Bocage of Vendée, situated in the departments of Vendée, Deux-Sèvres, Maine-et-Loire, and Loire-Inférieure.
BOCAGE (from O. Fr. boscage, Late Lat. boscum, meaning a wood) is a French geographic term used for several areas in France that typically feature granite formations and rolling or hilly landscapes. These regions are primarily made up of heath or reclaimed land and are sprinkled with clusters of trees. The key areas described by this term are (1) the Bocage of Normandy, which includes parts of the 102 departments of Calvados, Manche, and Orne; and (2) the Bocage of Vendée, located in the departments of Vendée, Deux-Sèvres, Maine-et-Loire, and Loire-Inférieure.
BOCCACCIO, GIOVANNI (1313-1375), Italian author, whose Decameron is one of the classics of literature, was born in 1313, as we know from a letter of Petrarch, in which that poet, who was born in 1304, calls himself the senior of his friend by nine years. The place of his birth is somewhat doubtful—Florence, Paris and Certaldo being all mentioned by various writers as his native city. Boccaccio undoubtedly calls himself a Florentine, but this may refer merely to the Florentine citizenship acquired by his grandfather. The claim of Paris has been supported by Baldelli and Tiraboschi, mainly on the ground that his mother was a lady of good family in that city, where she met Boccaccio’s father. There is a good deal in favour of Certaldo, a small town or castle in the valley of the Elsa, 20 m. from Florence, where the family had some property, and where the poet spent much of the latter part of his life. He always signed his name Boccaccio da Certaldo, and named that town as his birthplace in his own epitaph. Petrarch calls his friend Certaldese; and Filippo Villani, a contemporary, distinctly says that Boccaccio was born in Certaldo.
BOCCACCIO, GIOVANNI (1313-1375), Italian author, whose Decameron is one of the great works of literature, was born in 1313, as noted in a letter from Petrarch, who was born in 1304 and refers to himself as being nine years older than his friend. The exact place of his birth is somewhat uncertain—Florence, Paris, and Certaldo are all mentioned by different writers as his birthplace. Boccaccio definitely identifies himself as a Florentine, but this might just refer to the Florentine citizenship obtained by his grandfather. The Parisian claim has been supported by Baldelli and Tiraboschi, mainly because his mother was from a respected family in that city, where she met Boccaccio’s father. There is considerable support for Certaldo, a small town in the Elsa valley, 20 miles from Florence, where the family owned some property and where the poet spent much of his later life. He always signed his name Boccaccio da Certaldo and referred to that town as his birthplace in his epitaph. Petrarch calls his friend Certaldese; and the contemporary writer Filippo Villani clearly states that Boccaccio was born in Certaldo.
Boccaccio, an illegitimate son, as is put beyond dispute by the fact that a special licence had to be obtained when he desired to become a priest, was brought up with tender care by his father, who seems to have been a merchant of respectable rank. His elementary education he received from Giovanni da Strada, an esteemed teacher of grammar in Florence. But at an early age he was apprenticed to an eminent merchant, with whom he remained for six years, a time entirely lost to him, if we may believe his own statement. For from his tenderest years his soul was attached to that “alma poesis,” which, on his tombstone, he names as the task and study of his life. In one of his works he relates that, in his seventh year, before he had ever seen a book of poetry or learned the rules of metrical composition, he began to write verse in his childish fashion, and earned for himself amongst his friends the name of “the poet.” It is uncertain where Boccaccio passed these six years of bondage; most likely he followed his master to various centres of commerce in Italy and France. We know at least that he was in Naples and Paris for some time, and the youthful impressions received in the latter city, as well as the knowledge of the French language acquired there, were of considerable influence on his later career. Yielding at last to his son’s immutable aversion to commerce, the elder Boccaccio permitted him to adopt a course of study somewhat more congenial to the literary tastes of the young man. He was sent to a celebrated professor of canon law, at that time an important field of action both to the student and the practical jurist. According to some accounts—far from authentic, it is true—this professor was Cino da Pistoia, the friend of Dante, and himself a celebrated poet and scholar. But, whoever he may have been, Boccaccio’s master was unable to inspire his pupil with scientific ardour. “Again,” Boccaccio says, “I lost nearly six years. And so nauseous was this study to my mind, that neither the teaching of my master, nor the authority and command of my father, nor yet the exertions and reproof of my friends, could make me take to it, for my love of poetry was invincible.”
Boccaccio, an illegitimate son—evidenced by the fact that he needed a special license to become a priest—was raised with great care by his father, who appears to have been a well-respected merchant. He received his early education from Giovanni da Strada, a well-regarded grammar teacher in Florence. However, at a young age, he was apprenticed to a prominent merchant, and he spent six years with him, which he claimed was a complete waste of time. From a young age, he was drawn to “alma poesis,” which he described as the focus of his life on his tombstone. In one of his works, he mentions that at just seven years old, before he had ever seen a poetry book or learned about meter, he began writing verses in his own childish way, earning him the nickname “the poet” among his friends. It’s unclear where Boccaccio spent these six years of servitude; he probably traveled with his master to various commercial hubs in Italy and France. We do know he spent some time in Naples and Paris, and the experiences and knowledge of French he gained there significantly impacted his later career. Eventually, his father, acknowledging his son’s strong dislike for commerce, allowed him to pursue studies more aligned with his literary interests. He was sent to a renowned professor of canon law, an important area of study for both students and practicing lawyers at the time. According to some accounts—though not very reliable—this professor was Cino da Pistoia, a friend of Dante and a renowned poet and scholar in his own right. Regardless of who he was, Boccaccio's mentor failed to ignite a passion for academics in him. “Once again,” Boccaccio remarked, “I lost nearly six years. This study was so repugnant to me that not even my master's teachings, my father's authority, or the pushback from my friends could persuade me to take it up, as my love for poetry was unyielding.”
About 1333 Boccaccio settled for some years at Naples, apparently sent there by his father to resume his mercantile pursuits, the canon law being finally abandoned. The place, it must be confessed, was little adapted to lead to a practical view of life one in whose heart the love of poetry was firmly rooted. The court of King Robert of Anjou at Naples was frequented by many Italian and French men of letters, the great Petrarch amongst the number. At the latter’s public examination in the noble science of poetry by the king, previous to his receiving the laurel crown at Rome, Boccaccio was present,—without, however, making his personal acquaintance at this period. In the atmosphere of this gay court, enlivened and adorned by the wit of men and the beauty of women, Boccaccio lived for several years. We can imagine how the tedious duties of the market and the counting-house became more and more distasteful to his aspiring nature. We are told that, finding himself by chance on the supposed grave of Virgil, near Naples, Boccaccio on that sacred spot took the firm resolution of devoting himself for ever to poetry. But perhaps another event, which happened some time after, led quite as much as the first-mentioned occurrence to this decisive turning-point in his life. On Easter-eve, 1341, in the church of San Lorenzo, Boccaccio saw for the first time the natural daughter of King Robert, Maria, whom he immortalized as Fiammetta in the noblest creations of his muse. Boccaccio’s passion on seeing her was instantaneous, and (if we may accept as genuine the confessions contained in one of her lover’s works) was returned with equal ardour on the part of the lady. But not till after much delay did she yield to the amorous demands of the poet, in spite of her honour and her duty as the wife of another. All the information we have with regard to Maria or Fiammetta is derived from the works of Boccaccio himself, and owing to several apparently contradictory statements occurring in these works, the very existence of the lady has been doubted by commentators, who seem to forget that, surrounded by the chattering tongues of a court, and watched perhaps by a jealous husband, Boccaccio had all possible reason to give the appearance of fictitious incongruity to the effusions of his real passion. But there seems no more reason to call into question the main features of the story, or even the identity of the person, than there would be in the case of Petrarch’s Laura or of Dante’s Beatrice. It has been ingeniously pointed out by Baldelli, that the fact of her descent from King Robert being known only to Maria herself, and through her to Boccaccio, the latter was the more at liberty to refer to this circumstance,—the bold expression of the truth serving in this case to increase the mystery with which the poets of the middle ages loved, or were obliged, to surround the objects of their praise. From Boccaccio’s Ameto we learn that Maria’s mother was, like his own, a French lady, whose husband, according to Baldelli’s ingenious conjecture, was of the noble house of Aquino, and therefore of the same family with the celebrated Thomas Aquinas. Maria died, according to his account, long before her lover, who cherished her memory to the end of his life, as we see from a sonnet written shortly before his death.
Around 1333, Boccaccio settled in Naples for several years, seemingly sent by his father to continue his business activities, leaving the law behind. The city, to be honest, wasn’t exactly suited for someone whose heart was deeply rooted in poetry. King Robert of Anjou’s court in Naples was frequented by many Italian and French writers, including the great Petrarch. When Petrarch had a public examination in poetry by the king before receiving his laurel crown in Rome, Boccaccio was there, though they didn’t meet personally at that time. In the lively atmosphere of this vibrant court, filled with witty men and beautiful women, Boccaccio spent several years. One can imagine how the dull responsibilities of the market and the counting house became increasingly unappealing to his ambitious spirit. It’s said that one day he happened to be near the supposed grave of Virgil, and on that significant spot, he made a firm decision to dedicate himself to poetry forever. However, another event a bit later may have had just as much influence on this turning point in his life. On Easter Eve, 1341, in the church of San Lorenzo, Boccaccio first laid eyes on Maria, the illegitimate daughter of King Robert, whom he famously immortalized as Fiammetta in his greatest works. Boccaccio’s passion was instant, and (if we take as genuine the motives expressed in one of his works) it was reciprocated with equal enthusiasm by her. But after much hesitation, she ultimately succumbed to the poet’s romantic advances, despite her honor and her obligations as a married woman. All we know about Maria or Fiammetta comes from Boccaccio's own writings, and due to various seemingly contradictory statements in them, some commentators have even questioned her existence, apparently forgetting that in the midst of a bustling court and possibly under the watchful eye of a jealous husband, Boccaccio had every reason to present his genuine emotions in a way that could seem fictional. However, there is no more reason to doubt the main elements of the story, or even the identity of the person, than there would be in the cases of Petrarch’s Laura or Dante’s Beatrice. Baldelli cleverly points out that since Maria’s royal lineage was known only to her and then to Boccaccio, he was freer to refer to this fact—boldly stating the truth in this case added to the mystery that medieval poets often cherished, or felt compelled to create, around their muses. From Boccaccio’s Ameto, we learn that Maria’s mother was also a French woman, and her husband, according to Baldelli’s creative speculation, was from the noble family of Aquino, thus related to the famous Thomas Aquinas. According to his account, Maria died long before her lover, who kept her memory alive until the end of his life, as evidenced by a sonnet written shortly before his death.
The first work of Boccaccio, composed by him at Fiammetta’s command, was the prose tale, Filocopo, describing the romantic love and adventures of Florio and Biancafiore, a favourite subject with the knightly minstrels of France, Italy and Germany. The treatment of the story by Boccaccio is not remarkable for originality or beauty, and the narrative is encumbered by classical allusions and allegorical conceits. The style also cannot be held worthy of the future great master of Italian prose. Considering, however, that this prose was in its infancy, and that this was Boccaccio’s first attempt at remoulding the unwieldy material at his disposal, it would be unjust to deny that Filocopo is a highly interesting work, full of promise and all but articulate power. Another work, written about the same time by Fiammetta’s desire and dedicated to her, is the Teseide, an epic poem, and indeed the first heroic epic in the Italian language. The name is chosen somewhat inappropriately, as King Theseus plays a secondary part, and the interest of the story centres in the two noble knights, Palemone and Arcito, and their wooing of the beautiful Emelia. The Teseide is of particular interest to the student of poetry, because it exhibits the first example of the ottava rima, a metre which was adopted by Tasso and Ariosto, and in English by Byron in Don Juan. Another link between Boccaccio’s epic and English literature is formed by the fact of Chaucer having in the Knight’s Tale adopted its main features.
Boccaccio's first work, created at Fiammetta’s request, was the prose tale, Filocopo, which tells the romantic love story and adventures of Florio and Biancafiore, a popular theme among the knightly minstrels of France, Italy, and Germany. Boccaccio's treatment of the story isn’t particularly noteworthy for originality or beauty, and the narrative is weighed down by classical references and allegorical ideas. The style also doesn’t measure up to what would later be expected from the great master of Italian prose. However, considering that prose was still in its early stages and that this was Boccaccio’s first attempt at shaping the difficult material he had on hand, it’s unfair to say that Filocopo isn’t a highly interesting work, full of potential and almost expressive energy. Another work, written around the same time at Fiammetta’s request and dedicated to her, is the Teseide, an epic poem, and indeed the first heroic epic in the Italian language. The title is somewhat misleading, as King Theseus plays a secondary role, and the story focuses on the two noble knights, Palemone and Arcito, and their courtship of the lovely Emelia. The Teseide is particularly interesting for poetry students because it presents the first example of the ottava rima, a meter later used by Tasso and Ariosto, and in English by Byron in Don Juan. Another connection between Boccaccio’s epic and English literature is that Chaucer incorporated its main features in the Knight’s Tale.
Boccaccio’s poetry has been severely criticized by his countrymen, and most severely by the author himself. On reading Petrarch’s sonnets, Boccaccio resolved in a fit of despair to burn his own attempts, and only the kindly encouragement of his great friend prevented the holocaust. Posterity has justly differed from the author’s sweeping self-criticism. It is true, that compared with Dante’s grandeur and passion, and with Petrarch’s absolute mastership of metre and language, Boccaccio’s 103 poetry seems to be somewhat thrown into shade. His verse is occasionally slip-shod, and particularly his epic poetry lacks what in modern parlance is called poetic diction,—the quality, that is, which distinguishes the elevated pathos of the recorder of heroic deeds from the easy grace of the mere conteur. This latter feature, so charmingly displayed in Boccaccio’s prose, has to some extent proved fatal to his verse. At the same time, his narrative is always fluent and interesting, and his lyrical pieces, particularly the poetic interludes in the Decameron, abound with charming gallantry, and frequently rise to lyrical pathos.
Boccaccio’s poetry has faced harsh criticism from his fellow countrymen, even more so from the author himself. After reading Petrarch’s sonnets, Boccaccio, feeling desperate, decided to burn his own work, but it was the supportive encouragement of his close friend that saved his poems. Over time, people have rightly disagreed with Boccaccio's harsh self-assessment. It's true that when compared to Dante’s greatness and passion, and Petrarch’s complete mastery of meter and language, Boccaccio’s poetry seems somewhat overshadowed. His verses can sometimes be sloppy, and especially his epic poetry lacks what we would now call poetic diction — that quality which sets apart the elevated emotion of someone recounting heroic deeds from the simple elegance of a mere storyteller. This charming quality in Boccaccio’s prose has somewhat hindered his poetry. However, his narratives are always engaging and fluent, and his lyrical pieces, especially the poetic interludes in the Decameron, are filled with delightful charm and often reach a touching lyrical quality.
About the year 1341 Boccaccio returned to Florence by command of his father, who in his old age desired the assistance and company of his son. Florence, at that time disturbed by civil feuds, and the silent gloom of his father’s house could not but appear in an unfavourable light to one accustomed to the gay life of the Neapolitan court. But more than all this, Boccaccio regretted the separation from his beloved Fiammetta. The thought of her at once embittered and consoled his loneliness. Three of his works owe their existence to this period. With all of them Fiammetta is connected; of one of them she alone is the subject. The first work, called Ameto, describes the civilizing influence of love, which subdues the ferocious manners of the savage with its gentle power. Fiammetta, although not the heroine of the story, is amongst the nymphs who with their tales of true love soften the mind of the huntsman. Ameto is written in prose alternating with verse, specimens of which form occur in old and middle Latin writings. It is more probable, however, that Boccaccio adopted it from that sweetest and purest blossom of medieval French literature, Aucassin et Nicolette, which dates from the 13th century, and was undoubtedly known to him. So pleased was Boccaccio with the idea embodied in the character of Ameto that he repeated its essential features in the Cimone of his Decameron (Day 5th, tale i.). The second work referred to is a poem in fifty chapters, called L’amorosa Visione. It describes a dream in which the poet, guided by a lady, sees the heroes and lovers of ancient and medieval times. Boccaccio evidently has tried to imitate the celebrated Trionfi of Petrarch, but without much success. There is little organic development in the poem, which reads like the catalogue raisonné of a picture gallery; but it is remarkable from another point of view. It is perhaps the most astounding instance in literature of ingenuity wasted on trifles; even Edgar Poe, had he known Boccaccio’s puzzle, must have confessed himself surpassed. For the whole of the Amorosa Visione is nothing but an acrostic on a gigantic scale. The poem is written, like the Divina Commedia, in terza rima, and the initial letters of all the triplets throughout the work compose three poems of considerable length, in the first of which the whole is dedicated to Boccaccio’s lady-love, this time under her real name of Maria. In addition to this, the initial letters of the first, third, fifth, seventh and ninth lines of the dedicatory poem form the name of Maria; so that here we have the acrostic in the second degree. No wonder that thus entrammelled the poet’s thought begins to flag and his language to halt. The third important work written by Boccaccio during his stay at Florence, or soon after his return to Naples, is called L’amorosa Fiammetta; and although written in prose, it contains more real poetry than the elaborate production just referred to. It purports to be Fiammetta’s complaint after her lover, following the call of filial duty, had deserted her. Bitterly she deplores her fate, and upbraids her lover with coldness and want of devotion. Jealous fears add to her torture, not altogether unfounded, if we believe the commentators’ assertion that the heroine of Ameto is in reality the beautiful Lucia, a Florentine lady loved by Boccaccio. Sadly Fiammetta recalls the moments of former bliss, the first meeting, the stolen embrace. Her narrative is indeed our chief source of information for the incidents of this strange love-story. It has been thought unlikely, and indeed impossible, that Boccaccio should thus have become the mouthpiece of a real lady’s real passion for himself; but there seems nothing incongruous in the supposition that after a happy reunion the poet should have heard with satisfaction, and surrounded with the halo of ideal art, the story of his lady’s sufferings. Moreover, the language is too full of individual intensity to make the conjecture of an entirely fictitious love affair intrinsically probable. L’amorosa Fiammetta is a monody of passion sustained even to the verge of dulness, but strikingly real, and therefore artistically valuable.
Around the year 1341, Boccaccio returned to Florence at his father’s request, who wanted his son's help and company in old age. At that time, Florence was troubled by civil conflicts, and the muted atmosphere of his father's home must have seemed quite dull to someone used to the lively lifestyle of the Neapolitan court. More than anything, Boccaccio missed being with his beloved Fiammetta. The thought of her both deepened his loneliness and provided some comfort. Three of his works were created during this time, all connected to Fiammetta; in one, she is the central character. The first work, called Ameto, illustrates how love has a civilizing effect, taming the fierce behaviors of the savage with its gentle strength. Although Fiammetta isn’t the main character, she is among the nymphs whose true love stories soften a hunter’s heart. Ameto is written in a mix of prose and verse, with examples of this style found in early and medieval Latin literature. However, it’s more likely that Boccaccio took inspiration from the beautiful and pure classic of medieval French literature, Aucassin et Nicolette, from the 13th century, which he probably knew. Boccaccio was so taken with the concept encapsulated in the character of Ameto that he echoed its main ideas in the character Cimone from his Decameron (Day 5, tale 1). The second work he wrote, a poem in fifty sections called L’amorosa Visione, depicts a dream where the poet, guided by a lady, sees ancient and medieval heroes and lovers. Boccaccio clearly tried to mimic the well-known Trionfi by Petrarch but with little success. The poem lacks cohesive development and reads more like a list of artwork; however, it stands out in another way. It might be the most impressive example of creativity misapplied in literature; even Edgar Poe, had he known of Boccaccio’s puzzle, would have had to admit being outdone. The entire Amorosa Visione is merely a grand acrostic. Like the Divina Commedia, the poem uses terza rima, and the first letters of each triplet throughout the poem together form three lengthy poems, the first of which is dedicated to Boccaccio’s lady-love, this time using her real name, Maria. Moreover, the initial letters of the first, third, fifth, seventh, and ninth lines of the dedicatory poem spell out the name Maria, creating a second-degree acrostic. No wonder the poet's thoughts start to falter and his phrasing becomes stilted under such complexity. The third significant work Boccaccio wrote during his time in Florence, or shortly after returning to Naples, is called L’amorosa Fiammetta. Even though it’s written in prose, it contains more true poetry than the previously discussed piece. It presents Fiammetta’s lament over her lover, who left her to fulfill his family obligations. She bitterly mourns her situation and scolds her lover for being indifferent and unfaithful. Jealous fears heighten her anguish, which may not be unfounded if we believe commentators who assert that the heroine of Ameto is actually the beautiful Lucia, a Florentine woman Boccaccio loved. Fiammetta sadly reminisces about their past joys, their first encounter, and their secret kiss. Her story is indeed our primary source of insight into this unusual love tale. Many believe it’s unlikely, even impossible, that Boccaccio would become the voice for a real woman's genuine affection for him; however, it doesn’t seem far-fetched to think that after reuniting happily, the poet would be pleased to learn about, and ideally portray, the story of his lady’s suffering. Additionally, the language is too rich in personal intensity to make the idea of a completely fabricated love affair likely. L’amorosa Fiammetta is a passionate monologue that teeters on the edge of dullness, yet it feels strikingly authentic and thus holds artistic value.
By the intercession of an influential friend, Boccaccio at last obtained (in 1344) his father’s permission to return to Naples, where in the meantime Giovanna, grand-daughter of King Robert, had succeeded to the crown. Being young and beautiful, fond of poetry and of the praise of poets, she received Boccaccio with all the distinction due to his literary fame. For many years she remained his faithful friend, and the poet returned her favour with grateful devotion. Even when the charge of having instigated, or at least connived at, the murder of her husband was but too clearly proved against her, Boccaccio was amongst the few who stood by her, and undertook the hopeless task of clearing her name from the dreadful stain. It was by her desire, no less than by that of Fiammetta, that he composed (between 1344 and 1350) most of the stories of his Decameron, which afterwards were collected and placed in the mouths of the Florentine ladies and gentlemen. During this time he also composed the Filostrato, a narrative poem, the chief interest of which, for the English reader, lies in its connexion with Chaucer. With a boldness pardonable only in men of genius, Chaucer adopted the main features of the plot, and literally translated parts of Boccaccio’s work, without so much as mentioning the name of his Italian source.
Thanks to the help of a powerful friend, Boccaccio finally got his father’s permission in 1344 to return to Naples, where Giovanna, the granddaughter of King Robert, had taken the throne. Young and beautiful, she loved poetry and the admiration of poets, and she welcomed Boccaccio with all the respect his literary reputation deserved. For many years, she remained his loyal friend, and the poet responded to her kindness with heartfelt devotion. Even when the accusation of having encouraged, or at least been complicit in, her husband’s murder was convincingly made against her, Boccaccio was among the few who supported her and took on the seemingly impossible task of clearing her name from that terrible accusation. At her request, as well as Fiammetta’s, he wrote most of the stories for his Decameron between 1344 and 1350, which were later gathered and presented as being told by Florentine ladies and gentlemen. During this period, he also wrote the Filostrato, a narrative poem, the main interest of which for English readers lies in its connection to Chaucer. With an audacity only excusable for genius, Chaucer took the key elements of the plot and translated parts of Boccaccio’s work literally, without even mentioning the name of his Italian source.
In 1350 Boccaccio returned to Florence, owing to the death of his father, who had made him guardian to his younger brother Jacopo. He was received with great distinction, and entered the service of the Republic, being at various times sent on important missions to the margrave of Brandenburg, and to the courts of several popes, both in Avignon and Rome. Boccaccio boasts of the friendly terms on which he had been with the great potentates of Europe, the emperor and pope amongst the number. But he was never a politician in the sense that Dante and Petrarch were. As a man of the world he enjoyed the society of the great, but his interest in the internal commotions of the Florentine state seems to have been very slight. Besides, he never liked Florence, and the expressions used by him regarding his fellow-citizens betray anything but patriotic prejudice. In a Latin eclogue he applies to them the term “Batrachos” (frogs), by which, he adds parenthetically—Ego intelligo Florentinorum morem; loquacissimi enim sumus, verum in rebus bellicis nihil valemus. The only important result of Boccaccio’s diplomatic career was his intimacy with Petrarch. The first acquaintance of these two great men dates from the year 1350, when Boccaccio, then just returned to Florence, did all in his power to make the great poet’s short stay in that city agreeable. When in the following year the Florentines were anxious to draw men of great reputation to their newly-founded university, it was again Boccaccio who insisted on the claims of Petrarch to the most distinguished position. He himself accepted the mission of inviting his friend to Florence, and of announcing to Petrarch at the same time that the forfeited estates of his family had been restored to him. In this manner an intimate friendship grew up between them to be parted only by death. Common interests and common literary pursuits were the natural basis of their friendship, and both occupy prominent positions in the early history of that great intellectual revival commonly called the Renaissance.
In 1350, Boccaccio returned to Florence after his father's death, who had made him the guardian of his younger brother Jacopo. He was received with great respect and started working for the Republic, being sent on important missions to the margrave of Brandenburg and to various popes in both Avignon and Rome. Boccaccio often boasts about his friendly relationships with Europe's major leaders, including the emperor and the pope. However, he was never a politician like Dante and Petrarch. While he enjoyed the company of influential people, he seemed to care little about the internal conflicts of Florence. Besides, he never liked Florence, and his comments about his fellow citizens reveal anything but patriotic pride. In a Latin eclogue, he refers to them as "Batrachos" (frogs), adding parenthetically—Ego intelligo Florentinorum morem; loquacissimi enim sumus, verum in rebus bellicis nihil valemus. The most significant outcome of Boccaccio’s diplomatic career was his friendship with Petrarch. Their first meeting was in 1350, shortly after Boccaccio returned to Florence, when he did everything he could to make the great poet’s brief stay in the city enjoyable. The following year, when the Florentines wanted to attract prominent figures to their newly-established university, it was again Boccaccio who pushed for Petrarch to take the most prestigious position. He personally invited his friend to Florence and informed Petrarch that his family's confiscated lands had been returned. This way, a close friendship developed between them that would only end with death. Shared interests and literary pursuits formed the foundation of their bond, and both played significant roles in the early history of the great intellectual revival known as the Renaissance.
During the 14th century the study of ancient literature was at a low ebb in Italy. The interest of the lay world was engrossed by political struggles, and the treasures of classical history and poetry were at the mercy of monks, too lazy or too ignorant to use, or even to preserve them. Boccaccio himself told that, on asking to see the library of the celebrated monastery of Monte Cassino, he was shown into a dusty room without a door to it. Many of the valuable manuscripts were mutilated; and his guide told him that the monks were in the habit of tearing leaves from the codices to turn them into psalters for children, or amulets for women at the price of four or five soldi apiece. 104 Boccaccio did all in his power to remove by word and example this barbarous indifference. He bought or copied with his own hand numerous valuable manuscripts, and an old writer remarks that if Boccaccio had been a professional copyist, the amount of his work might astonish us. His zealous endeavours for the revival of the all but forgotten Greek language in western Europe are well known. The most celebrated Italian scholars about the beginning of the 15th century were unable to read the Greek characters. Boccaccio deplored the ignorance of his age. He took lessons from Leone Pilato, a learned adventurer of the period, who had lived a long time in Thessaly and, although born in Calabria, pretended to be a Greek. By Boccaccio’s advice Leone Pilato was appointed professor of Greek language and literature in the university of Florence, a position which he held for several years, not without great and lasting benefit for the revival of classical learning. Boccaccio was justly proud of having been intimately connected with the foundation of the first chair of Greek in Italy. But he did not forget, in his admiration of classic literature, the great poets of his own country. He never tires in his praise of the sublime Dante, whose works he copied with his own hand. He conjures his friend Petrarch to study the great Florentine, and to defend himself against the charges of wilful ignorance and envy brought against him. A life of Dante, and the commentaries on the first sixteen cantos of the Inferno, bear witness to Boccaccio’s learning and enthusiasm.
During the 14th century, the study of ancient literature was at a low point in Italy. The interest of everyday people was consumed by political conflicts, and the treasures of classical history and poetry were left in the care of monks who were either too lazy or too uneducated to use or even preserve them. Boccaccio himself recounted that when he asked to see the library of the famous monastery of Monte Cassino, he was led into a dusty room that had no entrance. Many valuable manuscripts were damaged, and his guide informed him that the monks often tore out pages from the codices to make psalters for children or amulets for women, selling them for four or five soldi each. 104 Boccaccio did everything he could to combat this barbaric indifference through his words and actions. He bought or copied numerous valuable manuscripts by hand, and an old writer noted that if Boccaccio had been a professional copyist, the quantity of his work would astound us. His passionate efforts to revive the almost forgotten Greek language in Western Europe are well known. The most renowned Italian scholars at the beginning of the 15th century were unable to read Greek characters. Boccaccio lamented the ignorance of his time. He took lessons from Leone Pilato, a learned adventurer of the era who had lived in Thessaly for a long time and, despite being born in Calabria, claimed to be Greek. Following Boccaccio’s advice, Leone Pilato was appointed as a professor of Greek language and literature at the university of Florence, a role he held for several years, providing significant and lasting benefits for the revival of classical knowledge. Boccaccio was justly proud of being closely involved in establishing the first chair of Greek in Italy. However, he did not forget to honor the great poets of his own country in his admiration for classic literature. He continually praises the sublime Dante, whose works he copied by hand. He urges his friend Petrarch to study the great Florentine and to defend himself against accusations of willful ignorance and envy directed at him. A biography of Dante and commentaries on the first sixteen cantos of the Inferno attest to Boccaccio’s knowledge and enthusiasm.
In the chronological enumeration of our author’s writings we now come to his most important work, the Decameron, a collection of one hundred stories, published in their combined form in 1353, although mostly written at an earlier date. This work marks in a certain sense the rise of Italian prose. It is true that Dante’s Vita Nuova was written before, but its involved sentences, founded essentially on Latin constructions, cannot be compared with the infinite suppleness and precision of Boccaccio’s prose. The Cento Novelle Antiche, on the other hand, which also precedes the Decameron in date, can hardly be said to be written in artistic language according to definite rules of grammar and style. Boccaccio for the first time speaks a new idiom, flexible and tender, like the character of the nation, and capable of rendering all the shades of feeling, from the coarse laugh of cynicism to the sigh of hopeless love. It is by the name of “Father of Italian Prose” that Boccaccio ought to be chiefly remembered.
In the chronological list of our author’s works, we now arrive at his most significant piece, the Decameron, a collection of one hundred stories published together in 1353, though mostly written earlier. This work marks a pivotal moment in the development of Italian prose. While Dante’s Vita Nuova came first, its complex sentences, heavily based on Latin structures, cannot be compared to the remarkable flexibility and precision of Boccaccio’s prose. The Cento Novelle Antiche, which also predates the Decameron, is hardly written in a polished style with clear grammatical and stylistic rules. Boccaccio is the first to articulate a new language, smooth and gentle, reflective of the character of the nation, and capable of expressing all kinds of emotions, from the harsh laughter of cynicism to the sigh of unrequited love. It is as the "Father of Italian Prose" that Boccaccio should be primarily remembered.
Like most progressive movements in art and literature, Boccaccio’s remoulding of Italian prose may be described as a “return to nature.” It is indeed the nature of the Italian people itself which has become articulate in the Decameron; here we find southern grace and elegance, together with that unveiled naïveté of impulse which is so striking and so amiable a quality of the Italian character. The undesirable complement of the last-mentioned feature, a coarseness and indecency of conception and expression hardly comprehensible to the northern mind, also appears in the Decameron, particularly where the life and conversation of the lower classes are the subject of the story. At the same time, these descriptions of low life are so admirable, and the character of popular parlance rendered with such humour, as often to make the frown of moral disgust give way to a smile.
Like most progressive movements in art and literature, Boccaccio’s transformation of Italian prose can be seen as a “return to nature.” It’s truly the essence of the Italian people that comes through in the Decameron; here we see southern grace and elegance, alongside that open naïveté of impulse which is such a striking and charming aspect of the Italian character. The less desirable side of this quality—a coarseness and indecency in both thought and expression that can be hard for a northern mind to grasp—also appears in the Decameron, especially when depicting the lives and conversations of the lower classes. However, these portrayals of everyday life are so well done, and the use of common language is rendered with such humor, that often the frown of moral disapproval gives way to a smile.
It is not surprising that a style so concise and yet so pliable so typical and yet so individual, as that of Boccaccio was of enormous influence on the further progress of a prose in a manner created by it. This influence has indeed prevailed down to the present time, to an extent beneficial upon the whole, although frequently fatal to the development of individual writers. Novelists like Giovanni Fiorentino or Franco Sacchetti are completely under the sway of their great model; and Boccaccio’s influence may be discerned equally in the plastic fulness of Machiavelli and in the pointed satire of Aretino. Without touching upon the individual merits of Lasca, Bandello and other novelists of the cinque-cento, it may be asserted that none of them created a style independent of their great predecessor. One cannot indeed but acquiesce in the authoritative utterance of the Accademia della Crusca, which holds up the Decameron as the standard and model of Italian prose. Even the Della Cruscan writers themselves have been unable to deprive the language wholly of the fresh spontaneity of Boccaccio’s manner, which in modern literature we again admire in Manzoni’s Promessi sposi.
It's not surprising that a style so concise yet flexible, so typical yet so unique, as that of Boccaccio had a huge impact on the development of prose that he helped create. This influence has continued to be felt even today, generally for the better, although it has often hindered the growth of individual writers. Novelists like Giovanni Fiorentino and Franco Sacchetti are completely influenced by their great model; Boccaccio’s impact can also be seen in the rich substance of Machiavelli's work and the sharp satire of Aretino. Without delving into the individual strengths of Lasca, Bandello, and other novelists from the 1500s, it can be stated that none of them developed a style independent of their great predecessor. One cannot help but agree with the authoritative stance of the Accademia della Crusca, which considers the Decameron as the benchmark and model of Italian prose. Even the writers of the Della Crusca have not managed to completely remove the fresh spontaneity of Boccaccio’s style, which we can again appreciate in Manzoni’s Promessi sposi.
A detailed analysis of a work so well known as the Decameron would be unnecessary. The description of the plague of Florence preceding the stories is universally acknowledged to be a masterpiece of epic grandeur and vividness. It ranks with the paintings of similar calamities by Thucydides, Defoe and Manzoni. Like Defoe, Boccaccio had to draw largely on hearsay and his own imagination, it being almost certain that in 1348 he was at Naples, and therefore no eye-witness of the scenes he describes. The stories themselves, a hundred in number, range from the highest pathos to the coarsest licentiousness. A creation like the patient Griselda, which international literature owes to Boccaccio, ought to atone for much that is morally and artistically objectionable in the Decameron. It may be said on this head, that his age and his country were not only deeply immoral, but in addition exceedingly outspoken. Moreover, his sources were anything but pure. Most of his improper stories are either anecdotes from real life, or they are taken from the fabliaux of medieval French poets. On comparing the latter class of stories (about one-fifth of the whole Decameron) with their French originals, one finds that Boccaccio has never added to, but has sometimes toned down the revolting ingredients. Notwithstanding this, it cannot be denied that the artistic value of the Decameron is greatly impaired by descriptions and expressions, the intentional licentiousness of which is but imperfectly veiled by an attempt at humour.
A detailed analysis of a well-known work like the Decameron seems unnecessary. The description of the plague in Florence that comes before the stories is widely recognized as a masterpiece of epic scope and vividness. It stands alongside paintings of similar disasters by Thucydides, Defoe, and Manzoni. Like Defoe, Boccaccio relied heavily on hearsay and his own imagination since it is almost certain that in 1348 he was in Naples and not an eyewitness to the events he describes. The stories themselves, totaling a hundred, range from deep emotional impact to crude licentiousness. A character like the patient Griselda, which international literature owes to Boccaccio, should make up for much of the morally and artistically questionable content in the Decameron. It can be argued that his time and country were not only incredibly immoral but also very blunt about it. Additionally, his sources were anything but wholesome. Most of his inappropriate stories are either real-life anecdotes or pulled from the fabliaux of medieval French poets. When comparing these stories (about one-fifth of the entire Decameron) to their French originals, it becomes clear that Boccaccio rarely added to them and sometimes even toned down the offensive elements. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that the artistic value of the Decameron is significantly diminished by its descriptions and expressions, where the intentional explicitness is only partially concealed by an attempt at humor.
Boccaccio has been accused of plagiarism, particularly by French critics, who correctly state that the subjects of many stories in the Decameron are borrowed from their literature. A similar objection might be raised against Chaucer, Shakespeare, Goethe (in Faust), and indeed most of the master minds of all nations. Power of invention is not the only nor even the chief criterion of a great poet. He takes his subjects indiscriminately from his own fancy, or from the consciousness of his and other nations. Stories float about in the air, known to all yet realized by few; the poet gathers their disjecta membra into an organic whole, and this he inspires and calls into life with the breath of his genius. It is in this sense that Boccaccio is the creator of those innumerable beautiful types and stories, which have since become household words amongst civilized nations. No author can equal him in these contributions to the store of international literature. There are indeed few great poets who have not in some way become indebted to the inexhaustible treasure of Boccaccio’s creativeness. One of the greatest masterpieces of German literature, Lessing’s Nathan the Wise, contains a story from Boccaccio (Decameron, Day 1st, tale iii.), and the list of English poets who have drawn from the same source comprises, among many others, the names of Chaucer, Lydgate, Dryden, Keats and Tennyson.
Boccaccio has faced accusations of plagiarism, especially from French critics, who correctly point out that many of the stories in the Decameron are taken from their literature. A similar criticism could be directed at Chaucer, Shakespeare, Goethe (in Faust), and indeed many of the great minds across nations. The ability to invent isn't the only or even the main measure of a great poet. He draws his themes freely from his imagination or from the awareness of his own and other cultures. Stories exist in the collective consciousness, known to many but realized by few; the poet collects their disjecta membra into a unified whole, breathing life into them with the spark of his genius. In this way, Boccaccio is the originator of countless beautiful types and stories that have since become common references among civilized societies. No author can match him in these contributions to the wealth of international literature. In fact, there are very few great poets who have not benefited in some way from Boccaccio’s endless creativity. One of the greatest masterpieces of German literature, Lessing’s Nathan the Wise, includes a story from Boccaccio (Decameron, Day 1st, tale iii.), and the list of English poets who have drawn from the same source features, among many others, the names of Chaucer, Lydgate, Dryden, Keats, and Tennyson.
For ten years Boccaccio continued to reside in Florence, leaving the city only occasionally on diplomatic missions or on visits to his friends. His fame in the meantime began to spread far and wide, and his Decameron, in particular, was devoured by the fashionable ladies and gentlemen of the age. About 1360 he seems to have retired from the turbulent scenes of Florence to his native Certaldo, the secluded charms of which he describes with rapture. In the following year took place that strange turning-point in Boccaccio’s career which is generally described as his conversion. It seems that a Carthusian monk came to him while at Certaldo charged with a posthumous message from another monk of the same order, to the effect that if Boccaccio did not at once abandon his godless ways in life and literature his death would ensue after a short time. It is also mentioned that the revelation to the friar on his deathbed of a secret known only to Boccaccio gave additional import to this alarming information. Boccaccio’s impressionable nature was deeply moved. His life had been far from virtuous; in his 105 writings he had frequently sinned against the rules of morality, and worse still, he had attacked with bitter satire the institutions and servants of holy mother church. Terrified by the approach of immediate death, he resolved to sell his library, abandon literature, and devote the remainder of his life to penance and religious exercise. To this effect he wrote to Petrarch. We possess the poet’s answer; it is a masterpiece of writing, and what is more, a proof of tenderest friendship. The message of the monk Petrarch is evidently inclined to treat simply as pious fraud, without, however, actually committing himself to that opinion. “No monk is required to tell thee of the shortness and precariousness of human life. Of the advice received accept what is good; abandon worldly cares, conquer thy passions, and reform thy soul and life of degraded habits. But do not give up the studies which are the true food of a healthy mind.” Boccaccio seems to have acted on this valuable advice. His later works, although written in Latin and scientific in character, are by no means of a religious kind. It seems, however, that his entering the church in 1362 is connected with the events just related.
For ten years, Boccaccio lived in Florence, only leaving occasionally for diplomatic missions or to visit friends. During this time, his reputation began to grow, and his Decameron became popular among the fashionable men and women of the era. Around 1360, he appears to have stepped away from the chaos of Florence to his hometown, Certaldo, which he describes with great affection. The following year marked a strange turning point in Boccaccio's life, commonly referred to as his conversion. A Carthusian monk visited him in Certaldo, bearing a posthumous message from another monk of the same order. The message warned that if Boccaccio did not immediately abandon his sinful lifestyle in both life and writing, he would soon face death. It was also noted that a secret revealed to the monk on his deathbed, known only to Boccaccio, added weight to this alarming warning. Boccaccio, being quite impressionable, was profoundly affected. His life had not been virtuous; in his 105 writings, he had often violated moral standards and, worse, had harshly criticized the institutions and servants of the holy church. Fearful of imminent death, he decided to sell his library, give up literature, and dedicate the rest of his life to penance and religious duties. He wrote to Petrarch about this decision. We have Petrarch’s reply; it is a remarkable piece of writing and, more importantly, shows deep friendship. Petrarch's message to Boccaccio seems inclined to view the monk’s warning as mere pious trickery, though he doesn't outright say so. “No monk needs to remind you of the brevity and uncertainty of human life. Take the good from the advice you received; let go of worldly concerns, overcome your passions, and reform your soul and habits. But do not abandon the studies that nourish a healthy mind.” Boccaccio appeared to have taken this valuable advice to heart. His later works, although written in Latin and scientific in nature, were definitely not religious. Nevertheless, it seems his entry into the church in 1362 is related to the events just described.
In 1363 Boccaccio went on a visit to Naples to the seneschal Acciajuoli (the same Florentine who had in 1344 persuaded the elder Boccaccio to permit his son’s return to Naples), who commissioned him to write the story of his deeds of valour. On his arrival, however, the poet was treated with shameful neglect, and revenged himself by denying the possibility of relating any valorous deeds for want of their existence. This declaration, it must be confessed, came somewhat late, but it was provoked by a silly attack on the poet himself by one of the seneschal’s indiscreet friends.
In 1363, Boccaccio visited Naples to see the seneschal Acciajuoli (the same Florentine who, in 1344, had convinced the elder Boccaccio to allow his son to return to Naples), who asked him to write about his heroic deeds. However, when he arrived, the poet was treated with disgraceful neglect, and he got back at them by claiming there were no heroic deeds to tell because they didn't exist. Admittedly, this response came a bit late, but it was triggered by a foolish attack on the poet by one of the seneschal’s thoughtless friends.
During the next ten years Boccaccio led an unsettled life, residing chiefly at Florence or Certaldo, but frequently leaving his home on visits to Petrarch and other friends, and on various diplomatic errands in the service of the Republic. He seems to have been poor, having spent large sums in the purchase of books, but his independent spirit rejected the numerous splendid offers of hospitality made to him by friends and admirers. During this period he wrote four important Latin works—De Genealogia Deorum libri XV., a compendium of mythological knowledge full of deep learning; De Montium, Silvarum, Lacuum, et Marium nominibus liber, a treatise on ancient geography; and two historical books—De Casibus Virorum et Feminarum Illustrium libri IX., interesting to the English reader as the original of John Lydgate’s Fall of Princes; and De Claris Mulieribus. To the list of his works ought to be added Il Ninfale Fiesolano, a beautiful love-story in verse, and Il Corbaccio ossia Il Laberinto d’Amore, a coarse satire on a Florentine widow who had jilted the poet, written about 1355, not to mention many eclogues in Latin and miscellaneous Rime in Italian (the latter collected by his biographer Count Baldelli in 1802).
Over the next ten years, Boccaccio lived a restless life, primarily staying in Florence or Certaldo, but often leaving his home to visit Petrarch and other friends, as well as undertaking various diplomatic missions for the Republic. He appeared to be poor, having spent a lot of money on books, but his independent nature turned down many generous offers of hospitality from friends and admirers. During this time, he wrote four significant Latin works—De Genealogia Deorum libri XV., a summary of mythological knowledge rich with deep insights; De Montium, Silvarum, Lacuum, et Marium nominibus liber, a treatise on ancient geography; and two historical books—De Casibus Virorum et Feminarum Illustrium libri IX., which is notable to English readers as the source for John Lydgate’s Fall of Princes; and De Claris Mulieribus. His works also include Il Ninfale Fiesolano, a beautiful love poem, and Il Corbaccio ossia Il Laberinto d’Amore, a harsh satire about a Florentine widow who had spurned the poet, written around 1355, not to mention many Latin eclogues and various Italian Rime (the latter collected by his biographer Count Baldelli in 1802).
In 1373 we find Boccaccio again settled at Certaldo. Here he was attacked by a terrible disease which brought him to the verge of death, and from the consequences of which he never quite recovered. But sickness could not subdue his intellectual vigour. When the Florentines established a chair for the explanation of the Divina Commedia in their university, and offered it to Boccaccio, the senescent poet at once undertook the arduous duty. He delivered his first lecture on the 23rd of October 1373. The commentary on part of the Inferno, already alluded to, bears witness of his unabated power of intellect. In 1374 the news of the loss of his dearest friend Petrarch reached Boccaccio, and from this blow he may be said to have never recovered. Almost his dying efforts were devoted to the memory of his friend; urgently he entreated Petrarch’s son-in-law to arrange the publication of the deceased poet’s Latin epic Africa, a work of which the author had been far more proud than of his immortal sonnets to Laura.
In 1373, Boccaccio was once again settled in Certaldo. Here, he was struck by a severe illness that brought him close to death, and he never fully recovered from its effects. However, sickness couldn't diminish his intellectual energy. When the Florentines created a position for the study of the Divina Commedia at their university and offered it to Boccaccio, the aging poet eagerly accepted the challenging role. He delivered his first lecture on October 23, 1373. His commentary on part of the Inferno, mentioned earlier, demonstrates his unwavering intellectual capability. In 1374, the news of his beloved friend Petrarch's death reached Boccaccio, and he can be said to have never truly recovered from that loss. In his final efforts, he dedicated himself to honoring his friend; he passionately urged Petrarch’s son-in-law to ensure the publication of the late poet’s Latin epic Africa, a work of which the author had been far prouder than of his famous sonnets to Laura.
In his last will Boccaccio left his library to his father confessor, and after his decease to the convent of Santo Spirito in Florence. His small property he bequeathed to his brother Jacopo. His own natural children had died before him. He himself died on the 21st of December 1375 at Certaldo, and was buried in the church of SS. Jacopo e Filippo of that town. On his tombstone was engraved the epitaph composed by himself shortly before his death. It is calm and dignified, worthy indeed of a great life with a great purpose. These are the lines:—
In his will, Boccaccio left his library to his confessor, and after his death, to the convent of Santo Spirito in Florence. He bequeathed his small estate to his brother Jacopo. His biological children had passed away before him. He died on December 21, 1375, in Certaldo, and was buried in the church of SS. Jacopo e Filippo in that town. His tombstone features an epitaph he wrote himself shortly before he died. It is calm and dignified, truly fitting for a great life with a significant purpose. Here are the lines:—
“Hac sub mole jacent cineres ac ossa Joannis; “Hac sub mole jacent cineres ac ossa Joannis; Mens sedet ante Deum, meritis ornata laborum Mens sits before God, adorned with the merits of her efforts Mortalis vitae. Genitor Boccaccius illi; Mortality of life. Father Boccaccio; Patria Certaldum; studium fuit alma poesis.” Patria Certaldum; the study was nurturing poetry.” |
A complete edition of Boccaccio’s Italian writings, in 17 vols., was published by Moutier (Florence, 1834). The life of Boccaccio has been written by Tiraboschi, Mazzuchelli, Count Baldelli (Vita di Boccaccio, Florence, 1806), and others. In English the best biography is Edward Hutton (1909.) The first printed edition of the Decameron is without date, place or printer’s name; but it is believed to belong to the year 1469 or 1470, and to have been printed at Florence. Besides this, Baldelli mentions eleven editions during the 15th century. The entire number of editions by far exceeds a hundred. A curious expurgated edition, authorized by the pope, appeared at Florence, 1573. Here, however, the grossest indecencies remain, the chief alteration being the change of the improper personages from priests and monks into laymen. The best old edition is that of Florence, 1527. Of modern reprints, that by Forfoni (Florence, 1857) deserves mention. Manni has written a Storia del Decamerone (1742), and a German scholar, M. Landau, who published (Vienna, 1869) a valuable investigation of the sources of the Decameron, subsequently brought out in 1877 a general study of Boccaccio’s life and works. An interesting English translation of the Decameron appeared in 1624, under the title The Model of Mirth, Wit, Eloquence and Conversation.
A complete edition of Boccaccio’s Italian writings, in 17 volumes, was published by Moutier (Florence, 1834). The life of Boccaccio has been written by Tiraboschi, Mazzuchelli, Count Baldelli (Vita di Boccaccio, Florence, 1806), and others. In English, the best biography is by Edward Hutton (1909). The first printed edition of the Decameron is without a publication date, place, or printer’s name; however, it is believed to be from the year 1469 or 1470 and to have been printed in Florence. In addition to this, Baldelli mentions eleven editions from the 15th century. The total number of editions significantly exceeds a hundred. A curious expurgated edition, authorized by the pope, was published in Florence in 1573. In this edition, the worst indecencies remain, with the main change being the replacement of improper characters from priests and monks to laymen. The best old edition is that of Florence, 1527. Among modern reprints, the one by Forfoni (Florence, 1857) is noteworthy. Manni wrote a Storia del Decamerone (1742), and a German scholar, M. Landau, published a valuable investigation of the sources of the Decameron in Vienna (1869), followed by a comprehensive study of Boccaccio’s life and works in 1877. An interesting English translation of the Decameron was released in 1624, titled The Model of Mirth, Wit, Eloquence and Conversation.
BOCCALINI, TRAJANO (1556-1613), Italian satirist, was born at Loretto in 1556. The son of an architect, he himself adopted that profession, and it appears that he commenced late in life to apply to literary pursuits. Pursuing his studies at Rome, he had the honour of teaching Bentivoglio, and acquired the friendship of the cardinals Gaetano and Borghesi, as well as of other distinguished personages. By their influence he obtained various posts, and was even appointed by Gregory XIII. governor of Benevento in the states of the church. Here, however, he seems to have acted imprudently, and he was soon recalled to Rome, where he shortly afterwards composed his most important work, the Ragguagli di Parnaso, in which Apollo is represented as receiving the complaints of all who present themselves, and distributing justice according to the merits of each particular case. The book is full of light and fantastic satire on the actions and writings of his eminent contemporaries, and some of its happier hits are among the hackneyed felicities of literature. To escape, it is said, from the hostility of those whom his shafts had wounded, he returned to Venice, and there, according to the register in the parochial church of Sta Maria Formosa, died of colic, accompanied with fever, on the 16th of November 1613. It was asserted, indeed, by contemporary writers that he had been beaten to death with sand-bags by a band of Spanish bravadoes, but the story seems without foundation. At the same time, it is evident from the Pietra del Paragone, which appeared after his death in 1615, that whatever the feelings of the Spaniards towards him, he cherished against them feelings of the bitterest hostility. The only government, indeed, which is exempt from his attacks is that of Venice, a city for which he seems to have had a special affection.
BOCCALINI, TRAJANO (1556-1613), an Italian satirist, was born in Loretto in 1556. The son of an architect, he followed in his father’s footsteps and seems to have started focusing on literary pursuits later in life. While studying in Rome, he had the honor of teaching Bentivoglio and forged friendships with cardinals Gaetano and Borghesi, along with other notable figures. Thanks to their influence, he secured various positions and was even appointed by Gregory XIII as the governor of Benevento in the Papal States. However, it seems he acted imprudently there and was soon recalled to Rome, where he quickly wrote his most significant work, the Ragguagli di Parnaso, portraying Apollo as listening to the complaints of everyone who approached and dispensing justice based on their merits. The book is filled with sharp and whimsical satire targeting the actions and writings of his prominent contemporaries, with some of its clever remarks becoming well-known in literature. To avoid retaliation from those he had offended with his critiques, he returned to Venice, where he reportedly died from colic and fever on November 16, 1613, according to the records at the parish church of Sta Maria Formosa. Contemporary writers claimed he was beaten to death with sandbags by a group of Spanish troublemakers, but this story appears unfounded. At the same time, it is clear from the Pietra del Paragone, published after his death in 1615, that no matter how the Spaniards felt about him, he harbored intense animosity towards them. The only government spared from his attacks is that of Venice, a city he seems to have held in special regard.
The Ragguagli, first printed in 1612, has frequently been republished. The Pietra has been translated into French, German, English and Latin; the English translator was Henry, earl of Monmouth, his version being entitled The Politicke Touchstone (London, 1674). Another posthumous publication of Boccalini was his Commentarii sopra Cornelia Tacito (Geneva, 1669). Many of his manuscripts are preserved still unprinted.
The Ragguagli, first published in 1612, has been reprinted many times. The Pietra has been translated into French, German, English, and Latin; the English translation was done by Henry, Earl of Monmouth, and is titled The Politicke Touchstone (London, 1674). Another posthumous work by Boccalini was his Commentarii sopra Cornelia Tacito (Geneva, 1669). Many of his manuscripts are still preserved and remain unpublished.
BOCCHERINI, LUIGI (1743-1805), Italian composer, son of an Italian bass-player, was born at Lucca, and studied at Rome, where he became a fine ’cellist, and soon began to compose. He returned to Lucca, where for some years he was prominent as a player, and there he produced two oratorios and an opera. He toured in Europe, and in 1768 was received in Paris by Gossec and his circle with great enthusiasm, his instrumental pieces being highly applauded; and from 1769 to 1785 he held the post of “composer and virtuoso” to the king of Spain’s brother, the infante Luis, at Madrid. He afterwards became “chamber-composer” to King Frederick William II. of Prussia, till 1797, 106 when he returned to Spain. He died at Madrid on the 28th of May 1805.
BOCCHERINI, LUIGI (1743-1805), Italian composer, son of an Italian bass player, was born in Lucca and studied in Rome, where he became an excellent cellist and quickly started composing. He returned to Lucca, where he gained recognition as a performer and created two oratorios and an opera. He traveled across Europe, and in 1768, he was enthusiastically received in Paris by Gossec and his circle, with his instrumental pieces receiving high praise; from 1769 to 1785, he served as “composer and virtuoso” for the king of Spain’s brother, Infante Luis, in Madrid. He later became “chamber-composer” to King Frederick William II of Prussia until 1797, 106 when he returned to Spain. He died in Madrid on May 28, 1805.
As an admirer of Haydn, and a voluminous writer of instrumental music, chiefly for the violoncello, Boccherini represents the effect of the rapid progress of a new art on a mind too refined to be led into crudeness, too inventive and receptive to neglect any of the new artistic resources within its cognizance, and too superficial to grasp their real meaning. His mastery of the violoncello, and his advanced sense of beauty in instrumental tone-colour, must have made even his earlier works seem to contemporaries at least as novel and mature as any of those experiments at which Haydn, with eight years more of age and experience, was labouring in the development of the true new forms. Most of Boccherini’s technical resources proved useless to Haydn, and resemblances occur only in Haydn’s earliest works (e.g. most of the slow movements of the quartets in op. 3 and in some as late as op. 17); whichever derived the characteristics of such movements from the other, the advantage is decidedly with Boccherini. But the progress of music did not lie in the production of novel beauties of instrumental tone in a style in which polyphonic organization was either deliberately abandoned or replaced by a pleasing illusion, while the form in its larger aspects was a mere inorganic amplification of the old suite-forms, which presupposed a genuine polyphonic organization as the vitalizing principle of their otherwise purely decorative nature. The true tendency of the new sonata forms was to make instrumental music dramatic in its variety and contrasts, instead of merely decorative. Haydn from the outset buried himself with the handling of new rhythmic proportions; and if it is hardly an exaggeration to say that the surprising beauty of colour in such a specimen of Boccherini’s 125 string-quintets as that in E major (containing the popular minuet) is perhaps more modern and certainly safer in performance than any special effect Haydn ever achieved, it is nevertheless true that even this beauty fails to justify the length and monotony of the work. Where Haydn uses any fraction of the resources of such a style, the ultimate effect is in proportion to a purpose of which Boccherini, with all his genuine admiration of his elder brother in art, could form no conception. Boccherini’s works are, however, still indispensable for violoncellists, both in their education and their concert repertories; and his position in musical history is assured as that of the most original and, next to Tartini, perhaps the greatest writer of music for stringed instruments in the late Italian amplifications of the older quasi-polyphonic sonata or suite-form that survived into the beginning of the 19th century in the works of Nardini. Boccherini may safely be regarded as its last real master. He was wittily characterized by the contemporary violinist Puppo as “the wife of Haydn”; which is very true, if man and woman are two different species; but not as true as e.g. the equally common saying that “Schubert is the wife of Beethoven,” and still less true than that “Vittoria is the wife of Palestrina.”
As a fan of Haydn and a prolific composer of instrumental music, mainly for the cello, Boccherini embodies the impact of the rapid evolution of a new art form on a mind that is too refined to fall into simplicity, too creative and open to ignore any of the new artistic tools available to it, and too superficial to truly understand their deeper significance. His skill with the cello and his advanced appreciation for beauty in instrumental tone must have made even his early works seem just as innovative and mature to his contemporaries as any of the experiments that Haydn, who was eight years older and more experienced, was engaging in while developing the new forms. Most of Boccherini's technical innovations turned out to be of little use to Haydn, and similarities are only found in Haydn's earliest works (e.g. most of the slow movements of the quartets in op. 3 and some as late as op. 17); regardless of which composer borrowed characteristics from the other, Boccherini clearly had the upper hand. However, the advancement of music wasn't just about creating new beauties of instrumental tone in a style that either consciously abandoned polyphonic structure or masked it with a pleasing illusion, while the form, in broader terms, was merely a disorganized extension of the old suite forms that relied on genuine polyphonic structure as their lifeblood to counterbalance their otherwise purely decorative nature. The true goal of the new sonata forms was to make instrumental music more dramatic through variety and contrast, rather than just ornamental. Haydn, from the very start, immersed himself in experimenting with new rhythmic structures; and while it might not be an exaggeration to say that the stunning beauty of color in one of Boccherini's 125 string quintets in E major (which includes the well-known minuet) is perhaps more modern and undeniably easier to perform than any specific effect Haydn ever accomplished, it's still true that even this beauty doesn't make up for the work's length and monotony. When Haydn utilizes even a fraction of the resources typical of such a style, the overall effect aligns with a purpose that Boccherini, despite his genuine admiration for his older counterpart in art, could not fully envision. Nevertheless, Boccherini's works remain essential for cellists, both in their training and in their concert repertoire; and his place in music history is secure as one of the most original composers and, next to Tartini, perhaps the greatest creator of music for string instruments during the late Italian adaptations of the earlier quasi-polyphonic sonata or suite form that persisted into the early 19th century in the works of Nardini. Boccherini can confidently be seen as its last true master. He was humorously referred to by his contemporary violinist Puppo as “the wife of Haydn,” which is quite accurate if we consider man and woman as two distinct species; but it is not as accurate as the equally common saying that “Schubert is the wife of Beethoven,” and even less true than the statement that “Vittoria is the wife of Palestrina.”
His life, with a Catalogue raisonné, was published by L. Picquot (1851).
His life, with a Catalogue raisonné, was published by L. Picquot (1851).
BOCCHUS, king of Mauretania (about 110 B.C.), and father-in-law of Jugurtha. In 108 he vacillated between Jugurtha and the Romans, and joined Jugurtha only on his promising him the third part of his kingdom. The two kings were twice defeated. Bocchus again made overtures to the Romans, and after an interview with Sulla, who was Marius’s quaestor at that time, sent ambassadors to Rome. At Rome the hope of an alliance was encouraged, but on condition that Bocchus showed himself deserving of it. After further negotiations with Sulla, he finally agreed to send a message to Jugurtha requesting his presence. Jugurtha fell into the trap and was given up to Sulla. Bocchus concluded a treaty with the Romans, and a portion of Numidia was added to his kingdom. Further to conciliate the Romans and especially Sulla, he sent to the Capitol a group of Victories guarding a device in gold showing Bocchus handing over Jugurtha to Sulla.
BOCCHUS king of Mauretania (around 110 BCE), and father-in-law of Jugurtha. In 108, he wavered between supporting Jugurtha and aligning with the Romans, eventually siding with Jugurtha after the latter promised him a third of his kingdom. The two kings faced defeat twice. Bocchus then sought to negotiate with the Romans, and after meeting with Sulla, who was Marius’s quaestor at the time, he sent ambassadors to Rome. The Romans were hopeful for an alliance, but it hinged on Bocchus proving himself worthy. Following more discussions with Sulla, he eventually agreed to send a message to Jugurtha to summon him. Jugurtha fell for the trap and was handed over to Sulla. Bocchus established a treaty with the Romans, gaining a part of Numidia for his kingdom. To further win over the Romans and especially Sulla, he sent a group of Victories to the Capitol, showcasing a golden emblem depicting Bocchus handing over Jugurtha to Sulla.
His son, Bocchus, was king of Mauretania, jointly with a younger brother Bogud. As enemies of the senatorial party, their title was recognized by Caesar (49 B.C.). During the African war they invaded Numidia and conquered Cirta, the capital of the kingdom of Juba, who was thus obliged to abandon the idea of joining Metellus Scipio against Caesar. At the end of the war, Caesar bestowed upon Bocchus part of the territory of Massinissa, Juba’s ally, which was recovered after Caesar’s murder by Massinissa’s son Arabion. Dio Cassius says that Bocchus sent his sons to support Sextus Pompeius in Spain, while Bogud fought on the side of Caesar, and there is no doubt that after Caesar’s death Bocchus supported Octavian, and Bogud Antony. During Bogud’s absence in Spain, his brother seized the whole of Numidia, and was confirmed sole ruler by Octavian. After his death in 33, Numidia was made a Roman province.
His son, Bocchus, was the king of Mauretania, alongside his younger brother Bogud. As enemies of the senatorial faction, their title was acknowledged by Caesar in 49 BCE. During the African campaign, they invaded Numidia and took over Cirta, the capital of King Juba, which forced Juba to abandon his plans of joining Metellus Scipio against Caesar. After the war, Caesar granted Bocchus part of Massinissa's territory, an ally of Juba, which was reclaimed after Caesar's assassination by Massinissa’s son Arabion. Dio Cassius notes that Bocchus sent his sons to assist Sextus Pompeius in Spain, while Bogud sided with Caesar, and it's clear that after Caesar’s death, Bocchus supported Octavian while Bogud sided with Antony. While Bogud was away in Spain, his brother took control of all of Numidia and was recognized as the sole ruler by Octavian. After Bocchus's death in 33, Numidia became a Roman province.
Bell. Afric. 25; Dio Cassius xli. 42, xliii. 36, xlviii. 45; Appian, Bell. Civ. ii. 96, iv. 54.
Bell. Afric. 25; Dio Cassius xli. 42, xliii. 36, xlviii. 45; Appian, Bell. Civ. ii. 96, iv. 54.
BOCHART, SAMUEL (1599-1667), French scholar, was born at Rouen on the 30th of May 1599. He was for many years a pastor of a Protestant church at Caen, and became tutor to Wentworth Dillon, earl of Roscommon. In 1646 he published his Phaleg and Chanaan (Caen, 1646 and 1651), the two parts of his Geographia Sacra. His Hierozoicon, which treats of the animals of Scripture, was printed in London (2 vols., 1663). In 1652 Christina of Sweden invited him to Stockholm, where he studied the Arabian manuscripts in the queen’s possession. He was accompanied by Pierre Daniel Huet, afterwards bishop of Avranches. On his return to Caen he was received into the academy of that city. Bochart was a man of profound erudition; he possessed a thorough knowledge of the principal Oriental languages, including Hebrew, Syriac, Chaldaic and Arabic; and at an advanced age he wished to learn Ethiopic. He was so absorbed in his favourite study, that he saw Phoenician and nothing but Phoenician in everything, even in Celtic words, and hence the number of chimerical etymologies which swarm in his works. He died at Caen on the 16th of May 1667.
BOCHART, SAMUEL (1599-1667), French scholar, was born in Rouen on May 30, 1599. He served for many years as a pastor of a Protestant church in Caen and became the tutor to Wentworth Dillon, the Earl of Roscommon. In 1646, he published his Phaleg and Chanaan (Caen, 1646 and 1651), the two parts of his Geographia Sacra. His Hierozoicon, which discusses the animals mentioned in Scripture, was published in London (2 vols., 1663). In 1652, Christina of Sweden invited him to Stockholm, where he studied the Arabic manuscripts in the queen’s collection. He was accompanied by Pierre Daniel Huet, who later became the bishop of Avranches. Upon returning to Caen, he was welcomed into the city's academy. Bochart was an incredibly learned man; he had a deep understanding of the main Oriental languages, including Hebrew, Syriac, Chaldaic, and Arabic; and even at an older age, he wanted to learn Ethiopic. He was so engrossed in his favorite study that he saw Phoenician influences everywhere, even in Celtic words, which resulted in many fanciful etymologies in his works. He passed away in Caen on May 16, 1667.
A complete edition of his works was published at Leiden, under the title of Sam. Bochart Opera Omnia (1675, 2 vols. folio; 4th ed., 3 vols., 1712). An Essay on the Life and Writings of Samuel Bochart, by W.R. Whittingham, appeared in 1829.
A complete edition of his works was published in Leiden, titled Sam. Bochart Opera Omnia (1675, 2 vols. folio; 4th ed., 3 vols., 1712). An Essay on the Life and Writings of Samuel Bochart, by W.R. Whittingham, was published in 1829.
BOCHUM, a town of Germany, in the Prussian province of Westphalia, 11 m. by rail west from Dortmund. Pop. (1905) 118,000. It is a centre of the iron and steel industries, producing principally cast steel, cast iron, iron pipes, wire and wire ropes, and lamps, with tin and zinc works, coal-mining, factories for carpets, calcium carbide and paper-roofing, brickworks and breweries. The Bochumer Verein für Bergbau (mining) und Gusstahl Fabrication (steel manufacture) is one of the principal trusts in this industry, founded in 1854. There are a mining and a metallurgical school.
BOCHUM, a town in Germany, located in the Prussian province of Westphalia, 11 miles by train west of Dortmund. Population (1905) 118,000. It is a hub for the iron and steel industries, primarily producing cast steel, cast iron, iron pipes, wire and wire ropes, and lamps, along with tin and zinc manufacturing, coal mining, carpet factories, calcium carbide and paper-roofing, brickworks, and breweries. The Bochumer Verein für Bergbau (mining) und Gusstahl Fabrication (steel manufacturing) is one of the main trusts in this sector, established in 1854. There are both a mining school and a metallurgical school.
BÖCKH, PHILIPP AUGUST (1785-1867), German classical scholar and antiquarian, was born in Karlsruhe on the 24th of November 1785. He was sent to the gymnasium of his native place, and remained there until he left for the university of Halle (1803), where he devoted himself to the study of theology. F.A. Wolf was then creating there an enthusiasm for classical studies; Böckh fell under the spell, passed from theology to philology, and became the greatest of all Wolf’s scholars. In 1807 he established himself as privat-docent in the university of Heidelberg and was shortly afterwards appointed a professor extraordinarius, becoming professor two years later. In 1811 he removed to the new Berlin University, having been appointed professor of eloquence and classical literature. He remained there till his death on the 3rd of August 1867. He was elected a member of the Academy of Sciences of Berlin in 1814, and for a long time acted as its secretary. Many of the speeches contained in his Kleine Schriften were delivered in this latter capacity.
BÖCKH, PHILIPP AUGUST (1785-1867), a German classical scholar and antiquarian, was born in Karlsruhe on November 24, 1785. He attended the gymnasium in his hometown and stayed there until he went to the University of Halle in 1803, where he focused on studying theology. F.A. Wolf was generating a passion for classical studies there; Böckh was captivated, shifted from theology to philology, and became the foremost of Wolf's students. In 1807, he became a privat-docent at the University of Heidelberg and was soon appointed an extraordinarius professor, officially becoming a professor two years later. In 1811, he moved to the newly established Berlin University after being appointed professor of eloquence and classical literature. He remained there until his death on August 3, 1867. He was elected a member of the Academy of Sciences of Berlin in 1814 and served as its secretary for a long time. Many of the speeches included in his Kleine Schriften were given in this role.
Böckh worked out the ideas of Wolf in regard to philology, 107 and illustrated them by his practice. Discarding the old notion that philology consisted in a minute acquaintance with words and the exercise of the critical art, he regarded it as the entire knowledge of antiquity, historical and philosophical. He divides philology into five parts: first, an inquiry into public acts, with a knowledge of times and places, into civil institutions, and also into law; second, an inquiry into private affairs; third, an exhibition of the religions and arts of the ancient nations; fourth, a history of all their moral and physical speculations and beliefs, and of their literatures; and fifth, a complete explanation of the language. These ideas in regard to philology Böckh set forth in a Latin oration delivered in 1822 (Gesammelte kleine Schriften, i.). In his speech at the opening of the congress of German philologists in 1850, he defined philology as the historical construction of the entire life—therefore, of all forms of culture and all the productions of a people in its practical and spiritual tendencies. He allows that such a work is too great for any one man; but the very infinity of subjects is the stimulus to the pursuit of truth, and men strive because they have not attained (ib. ii.). An account of Böckh’s division of philology will be found in Freund’s Wie studirt man Philologie?
Böckh expanded on Wolf's ideas about philology, 107 and demonstrated them through his work. He moved away from the old belief that philology was just about having a deep knowledge of words and being skillful in criticism. Instead, he saw it as a comprehensive understanding of ancient knowledge, both historical and philosophical. He divided philology into five parts: first, studying public actions, understanding the context of time and place, civil institutions, and law; second, examining private matters; third, showcasing the religions and arts of ancient cultures; fourth, exploring their moral and physical beliefs and their literature; and fifth, providing a complete explanation of the language. Böckh presented these ideas in a Latin speech in 1822 (Gesammelte kleine Schriften, i.). During his address at the opening of the congress of German philologists in 1850, he defined philology as the historical study of all aspects of life—thus, encompassing all forms of culture and a people’s intellectual and practical achievements. He acknowledged that such an endeavor is too vast for any single person, but the sheer breadth of subjects encourages the pursuit of truth, driving people to strive for what they have not yet achieved (ib. ii.). A summary of Böckh’s division of philology can be found in Freund’s Wie studirt man Philologie?
From 1806 till his death Böckh’s literary activity was unceasing. His principal works were the following:—(1) An edition of Pindar, the first volume of which (1811) contains the text of the Epinician odes; a treatise, De Metris Pindari, in three books; and Notae Criticae: the second (1819) contains the Scholia; and part ii. of volume ii. (1821) contains a Latin translation, a commentary, the fragments and indices. It is still the most complete edition of Pindar that we have. But it was especially the treatise on the metres which placed Böckh in the first rank of scholars. This treatise forms an epoch in the treatment of the subject. In it the author threw aside all attempts to determine the Greek metres by mere subjective standards, pointing out at the same time the close connexion between the music and the poetry of the Greeks. He investigated minutely the nature of Greek music as far as it can be ascertained, as well as all the details regarding Greek musical instruments; and he explained the statements of the ancient Greek writers on rhythm. In this manner he laid the foundation for a scientific treatment of Greek metres. (2) Die Staatshaushaltung der Athener, 1817 (2nd ed. 1851, with a supplementary volume Urkunden über das Seewesen des attischen Staats; 3rd ed. by Fränkel, 1886), translated into English by Sir George Cornewall Lewis (1828) under the title of The Public Economy of Athens. In it he investigated a subject of peculiar difficulty with profound learning. He amassed information from the whole range of Greek literature, carefully appraised the value of the information given, and shows throughout every portion of it rare critical ability and insight. A work of a similar kind was his Metrologische Untersuchungen über Gewichte, Münzfüsse, und Masse des Alterthums (1838). (3) Böckh’s third great work arose out of his second. In regard to the taxes and revenue of the Athenian state he derived a great deal of his most trustworthy information from inscriptions, many of which are given in his book. It was natural, therefore, that when the Berlin Academy of Sciences projected the plan of a Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum, Böckh should be chosen as the principal editor. This great work (1828-1877) is in four volumes, the third and fourth volumes being edited by J. Franz, E. Curtius, A. Kirchhoff and H. Röhl.
From 1806 until his death, Böckh was constantly active in literature. His main works include: (1) An edition of Pindar, with the first volume published in 1811 containing the text of the Epinician odes; a treatise, *De Metris Pindari*, in three books; and *Notae Criticae*. The second volume, released in 1819, includes the *Scholia*, and part ii. of volume ii. (1821) contains a Latin translation, commentary, fragments, and indices. This remains the most complete edition of Pindar available. However, it was particularly the treatise on the metres that established Böckh as a leading scholar. This work marked a significant turning point in the study of the subject. The author dismissed all attempts to define Greek metres using solely subjective standards, simultaneously highlighting the close connection between Greek music and poetry. He meticulously examined the nature of Greek music as much as possible, along with detailed information about ancient Greek musical instruments; he also explained the writings of ancient Greek authors concerning rhythm. In doing so, he laid the groundwork for a scientific approach to Greek metres. (2) *Die Staatshaushaltung der Athener*, 1817 (2nd ed. 1851, with a supplementary volume *Urkunden über das Seewesen des attischen Staats*; 3rd ed. by Fränkel, 1886), was translated into English by Sir George Cornewall Lewis in 1828 as *The Public Economy of Athens*. In this work, he tackled an exceptionally challenging subject with profound knowledge. He gathered information from the entirety of Greek literature, carefully evaluated its validity, and exhibited remarkable critical ability and insight throughout. A similar work was his *Metrologische Untersuchungen über Gewichte, Münzfüsse, und Masse des Alterthums* (1838). (3) Böckh’s third major work emerged from his second. Regarding the taxes and revenue of the Athenian state, he obtained much of his most reliable information from inscriptions, many of which are included in his book. It was therefore fitting that when the Berlin Academy of Sciences planned the *Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum*, Böckh was selected as the lead editor. This comprehensive work (1828-1877) consists of four volumes, with the third and fourth volumes edited by J. Franz, E. Curtius, A. Kirchhoff, and H. Röhl.
Böckh’s activity was continually digressing into widely different fields. He gained for himself a foremost position amongst the investigators of ancient chronology, and his name occupies a place by the side of those of Ideler and Mommsen. His principal works on this subject were: Zur Geschichte der Mondcyclen der Hellenen (1855); Epigraphisch-chronologische Studien (1856); Über die vierjährigen Sonnenkreise der Alten (1863), and several papers which he published in the Transactions of the Berlin Academy. Böckh also occupied himself with philosophy. One of his earliest papers was on the Platonic doctrine of the world, De Platonica corporis mundani fabrica (1809), followed by De Platonico Systemate Caelestium globorum et de vera Indole Astronomiae Philolaice (1810), to which may be added Manetho und die Hundsternperiode (1845). In opposition to Otto Gruppe (1804-1876), he denied that Plato affirmed the diurnal rotation of the earth (Untersuchungen über das kosmische System des Platon, 1852), and when in opposition to him Grote published his opinions on the subject (Plato and the Rotation of the Earth) Böckh was ready with his reply. Another of his earlier papers, and one frequently referred to, was Commentatio Academica de simultate quae Platoni cum Xenophonte intercessisse fertur (1811). Other philosophical writings were Commentatio in Platonis qui vulgo fertur Minoem (1806), and Philolaos’ des Pythagoreers Lehren nebst den Bruchstücken (1819), in which he endeavoured to show the genuineness of the fragments.
Böckh was constantly branching out into various different fields. He established himself as a leading figure among researchers of ancient chronology, joining the ranks of Ideler and Mommsen. His main works on this topic included: Zur Geschichte der Mondcyclen der Hellenen (1855); Epigraphisch-chronologische Studien (1856); Über die vierjährigen Sonnenkreise der Alten (1863), along with several articles published in the Transactions of the Berlin Academy. Böckh also delved into philosophy. One of his earliest papers discussed the Platonic view of the world, De Platonica corporis mundani fabrica (1809), which was followed by De Platonico Systemate Caelestium globorum et de vera Indole Astronomiae Philolaice (1810), and Manetho und die Hundsternperiode (1845). In contrast to Otto Gruppe (1804-1876), he argued that Plato did not support the idea of the diurnal rotation of the earth (Untersuchungen über das kosmische System des Platon, 1852), and when Grote countered with his views on the topic (Plato and the Rotation of the Earth), Böckh was quick to respond. Another one of his earlier, frequently cited papers was Commentatio Academica de simultate quae Platoni cum Xenophonte intercessisse fertur (1811). Other philosophical writings included Commentatio in Platonis qui vulgo fertur Minoem (1806), and Philolaos’ des Pythagoreers Lehren nebst den Bruchstücken (1819), where he attempted to demonstrate the authenticity of the fragments.
Besides his edition of Pindar, Böckh published an edition of the Antigone of Sophocles (1843) with a poetical translation and essays. An early and important work on the Greek tragedians is his Graecae Tragoediae Principum ... num ea quae supersunt et genuina omnia sint et forma primitiva servata (1808).
Besides his edition of Pindar, Böckh published an edition of Sophocles' Antigone (1843) with a poetic translation and essays. An early and significant work on the Greek tragedians is his Graecae Tragoediae Principum ... num ea quae supersunt et genuina omnia sint et forma primitiva servata (1808).
The smaller writings of Böckh began to be collected in his lifetime. Three of the volumes were published before his death, and four after (Gesammelte kleine Schriften, 1858-1874). The first two consist of orations delivered in the university or academy of Berlin, or on public occasions. The third, fourth, fifth and sixth contain his contributions to the Transactions of the Berlin Academy, and the seventh contains his critiques. Böckh’s lectures, delivered from 1809-1865, were published by Bratuschek under the title of Encyclopädie und Methodologie der philologischen Wissenschaften (2nd ed, Klussmann, 1886). His philological and scientific theories are set forth in Elze, Über Philologie als System (1845), and Reichhardt, Die Gliederung der Philologie entwickelt (1846). His correspondence with Ottfried Müller appeared at Leipzig in 1883. See Sachse, Erinnerungen an August Böckh (1868); Stark, in the Verhandlungen der Würzburger Philologensammlung (1868); Max Hoffmann, August Böckh (1901); and S. Reiter, in Neue Jahrbucher für das klassische Altertum (1902), p. 436.
The smaller writings of Böckh were collected during his lifetime. Three of the volumes were published before he died, and four after (Gesammelte kleine Schriften, 1858-1874). The first two volumes include speeches he gave at the universities or academies in Berlin, or at public events. The third, fourth, fifth, and sixth volumes contain his contributions to the Transactions of the Berlin Academy, and the seventh features his critiques. Böckh's lectures, which he delivered from 1809 to 1865, were published by Bratuschek under the title Encyclopädie und Methodologie der philologischen Wissenschaften (2nd ed, Klussmann, 1886). His philological and scientific theories are presented in Elze's Über Philologie als System (1845), and Reichhardt's Die Gliederung der Philologie entwickelt (1846). His correspondence with Ottfried Müller was published in Leipzig in 1883. See Sachse, Erinnerungen an August Böckh (1868); Stark, in Verhandlungen der Würzburger Philologensammlung (1868); Max Hoffmann, August Böckh (1901); and S. Reiter, in Neue Jahrbucher für das klassische Altertum (1902), p. 436.
BÖCKLIN, ARNOLD (1827-1901), Swiss painter, was born at Basel on the 16th of October 1827. His father, Christian Frederick Böcklin (b. 1802), was descended from an old family of Schaffhausen, and engaged in the silk trade. His mother, Ursula Lippe, was a native of the same city. In 1846 he began his studies at the Düsseldorf academy under Schirmer, who recognized in him a student of exceptional promise, and sent him to Antwerp and Brussels, where he copied the works of Flemish and Dutch masters. Böcklin then went to Paris, worked at the Louvre, and painted several landscapes; his “Landscape and Ruin” reveals at the same time a strong feeling for nature and a dramatic conception of scenery. After serving his time in the army he set out for Rome in March 1850, and the sight of the Eternal City was a fresh stimulus to his mind. So, too, was the influence of Italian nature and that of the dead pagan world. At Rome he married (June 20, 1853) Angela Rosa Lorenza Pascucci. In 1856 he returned to Munich, and remained there four years. He then exhibited the “Great Park,” one of his earliest works, in which he treated ancient mythology with the stamp of individuality, which was the basis of his reputation. Of this period, too, are his “Nymph and Satyr,” “Heroic Landscape” (Diana Hunting), both of 1858, and “Sappho” (1859). These works, which were much discussed, together with Lenbach’s recommendation, gained him his appointment as professor at the Weimar academy. He held the office for two years, painting the “Venus and Love,” a “Portrait of Lenbach,” and a “Saint Catherine.” He was again at Rome from 1862 to 1866, and there gave his fancy and his taste for violent colour free play in his “Portrait of Mme Böcklin,” now in the Basel gallery, in “An Anchorite in the Wilderness” (1863); a “Roman Tavern,” and “Villa on the Sea-shore” (1864); this last, one of his best pictures. He returned to Basel in 1866 to finish his frescoes in the gallery, and to paint, besides several portraits, “The Magdalene with Christ” (1868); “Anacreon’s Muse” (1869); and “A Castle and Warriors” (1871). His “Portrait of Myself,” with Death playing a violin (1873), was painted after his return again to Munich, where he exhibited his famous “Battle of the Centaurs” (in the Basel gallery); “Landscape with Moorish Horsemen” (in the Lucerne gallery); and “A Farm” (1875). From 1876 to 1885 Böcklin was working at Florence, and painted 108 a “Pietà,” “Ulysses and Calypso,” “Prometheus,” and the “Sacred Grove.” From 1886 to 1892 he settled at Zürich. Of this period are the “Naiads at Play,” “A Sea Idyll,” and “War.” After 1892 Böcklin resided at San Domenico, near Florence. An exhibition of his collected works was held at Basel from the 20th of September to the 24th of October 1897. He died on the 16th of January 1901.
BÖCKLIN, ARNOLD (1827-1901), Swiss painter, was born in Basel on October 16, 1827. His father, Christian Frederick Böcklin (b. 1802), came from an old family in Schaffhausen and was involved in the silk trade. His mother, Ursula Lippe, was originally from the same city. In 1846, he began his studies at the Düsseldorf academy under Schirmer, who recognized his exceptional talent and encouraged him to go to Antwerp and Brussels, where he copied works by Flemish and Dutch masters. Böcklin then moved to Paris, worked at the Louvre, and painted several landscapes; his “Landscape and Ruin” showcases both a strong appreciation for nature and a dramatic sense of scenery. After completing his military service, he traveled to Rome in March 1850, and the sight of the Eternal City sparked new inspiration in him. He was also influenced by the beauty of Italy and the remnants of the ancient pagan world. While in Rome, he married Angela Rosa Lorenza Pascucci on June 20, 1853. In 1856, he returned to Munich and stayed there for four years. He then exhibited “Great Park,” one of his earliest works, where he infused ancient mythology with his unique style, which laid the foundation for his reputation. From this period also came his works “Nymph and Satyr,” “Heroic Landscape” (Diana Hunting), both from 1858, and “Sappho” (1859). These works generated much discussion, and with Lenbach’s endorsement, he secured a position as a professor at the Weimar academy. He held that position for two years, during which he painted “Venus and Love,” a “Portrait of Lenbach,” and “Saint Catherine.” He was back in Rome from 1862 to 1866, where he freely explored his imagination and his penchant for bold colors in pieces like “Portrait of Mme Böcklin,” now housed in the Basel gallery, “An Anchorite in the Wilderness” (1863), “Roman Tavern,” and “Villa on the Sea-shore” (1864), the latter being one of his best works. He returned to Basel in 1866 to complete his frescoes in the gallery and painted several portraits, including “The Magdalene with Christ” (1868), “Anacreon’s Muse” (1869), and “A Castle and Warriors” (1871). His “Portrait of Myself,” featuring Death playing a violin (1873), was created after he returned to Munich, where he exhibited his renowned “Battle of the Centaurs” (in the Basel gallery), “Landscape with Moorish Horsemen” (in the Lucerne gallery), and “A Farm” (1875). From 1876 to 1885, Böcklin worked in Florence, completing pieces like a “Pietà,” “Ulysses and Calypso,” “Prometheus,” and the “Sacred Grove.” From 1886 to 1892, he settled in Zürich, creating works such as “Naiads at Play,” “A Sea Idyll,” and “War.” After 1892, Böcklin lived in San Domenico, near Florence. An exhibition of his collected works was held in Basel from September 20 to October 24, 1897. He passed away on January 16, 1901.
His life has been written by Henri Mendelssohn. See also F. Hermann, Gazette des Beaux Arts (Paris, 1893); Max Lehrs, Arnold Böcklin, Ein Leitfaden zum Verständniss seiner Kunst (Munich, 1897); W. Ritter, Arnold Böcklin (Gand, 1895); Katalog der Böcklin Jubiläums Ausstellung (Basel, 1897).
His life has been chronicled by Henri Mendelssohn. See also F. Hermann, Gazette des Beaux Arts (Paris, 1893); Max Lehrs, Arnold Böcklin, A Guide to Understanding His Art (Munich, 1897); W. Ritter, Arnold Böcklin (Gand, 1895); Catalog of the Böcklin Jubilee Exhibition (Basel, 1897).
BOCLAND, Bockland or Bookland (from A.S. boc, book), an original mode of tenure of land, also called charter-land or deed-land. Bocland was folk-land granted to individuals in private ownership by a document (charter or book) in writing, with the signatures of the king and witenagemot; at first it was rarely, if ever, held by laymen, except for religious purposes. Bocland to a certain extent resembled full ownership in the modern sense, in that the owner could grant it in his lifetime, in the same manner as he had received it, by boc or book, and also dispose of it by will. (See also Folkland.)
BOCLAND, Bockland or Bookland (from A.S. boc, book), an original way of holding land, also known as charter-land or deed-land. Bocland was community land granted to individuals in private ownership through a written document (charter or book), signed by the king and the witenagemot; initially, it was seldom, if ever, held by laypeople, except for religious reasons. Bocland somewhat resembled modern full ownership, as the owner could transfer it during their lifetime, just as they had received it, by boc or book, and could also leave it in their will. (See also Folkland.)
BOCSKAY, STEPHEN [István] (1557-1606), prince of Transylvania, the most eminent member of the ancient Bocskay family, son of György Bocskay and Krisztina Sulyok, was born at Kolozsvár, Hungary. As the chief councillor of Prince Zsigmond Báthory, he advised his sovereign to contract an alliance with the emperor instead of holding to the Turk, and rendered important diplomatic services on frequent missions to Prague and Vienna. The enmity towards him of the later Báthory princes of Transylvania, who confiscated his estates, drove him to seek protection at the imperial court (1599); but the attempts of the emperor Rudolph II. to deprive Hungary of her constitution and the Protestants of their religious liberties speedily alienated Bocskay, especially after the terrible outrages inflicted on the Transylvanians by the imperial generals Basta and Belgiojoso from 1602 to 1604. Bocskay, to save the independence of Transylvania, assisted the Turks; and in 1605, as a reward for his part in driving Basta out of Transylvania, the Hungarian diet, assembled at Modgyes, elected him prince (1605), on which occasion the Ottoman sultan sent a special embassy to congratulate him and a splendid jewelled crown made in Persia. Bocskay refused the royal dignity, but made skilful use of the Turkish alliance. To save the Austrian provinces of Hungary, the archduke Matthias, setting aside his semi-lunatic imperial brother Rudolph, thereupon entered into negotiations with Bocskay, and ultimately the peace of Vienna was concluded (June 23, 1606), which guaranteed all the constitutional and religious rights and privileges of the Hungarians both in Transylvania and imperial Hungary. Bocskay, at the same time, was acknowledged as prince of Transylvania by the Austrian court, and the right of the Transylvanians to elect their own independent princes in future was officially recognized. The fortress of Tokaj and the counties of Bereg, Szatmár and Ugocsa were at the same time ceded to Bocskay, with reversion to Austria if he should die childless. Simultaneously, at Zsitvatorok, a peace, confirmatory of the peace of Vienna, was concluded with the Turks. Bocskay survived this signal and unprecedented triumph only a few months. He is said to have been poisoned (December 29, 1606) by his chancellor, Mihály Kátay, who was hacked to bits by Bocskay’s adherents in the market-place of Kassa.
BOCSKAY, STEPHEN [István] (1557-1606), prince of Transylvania, the most prominent member of the ancient Bocskay family, son of György Bocskay and Krisztina Sulyok, was born in Kolozsvár, Hungary. As the chief adviser to Prince Zsigmond Báthory, he urged his ruler to form an alliance with the emperor rather than maintain relations with the Turks and provided significant diplomatic support through numerous missions to Prague and Vienna. The hostility from the later Báthory princes of Transylvania, who seized his lands, forced him to seek protection at the imperial court (1599); however, the attempts by Emperor Rudolph II to strip Hungary of its constitution and deny Protestants their religious freedoms quickly turned Bocskay against him, especially after the brutal acts committed against the Transylvanians by the imperial generals Basta and Belgiojoso from 1602 to 1604. To preserve Transylvania's independence, Bocskay allied with the Turks; and in 1605, as a reward for his role in driving Basta out of Transylvania, the Hungarian diet convened at Modgyes elected him prince (1605), during which the Ottoman sultan sent a special delegation to congratulate him and a magnificent jeweled crown crafted in Persia. Bocskay declined the royal title but cleverly utilized the Turkish alliance. To safeguard the Austrian regions of Hungary, Archduke Matthias, sidelining his somewhat unhinged imperial brother Rudolph, began negotiations with Bocskay, ultimately leading to the peace of Vienna (June 23, 1606), which secured all the constitutional and religious rights and privileges of Hungarians in both Transylvania and imperial Hungary. At the same time, the Austrian court recognized Bocskay as the prince of Transylvania, and the right of the Transylvanians to elect their own independent princes in the future was officially acknowledged. The fortress of Tokaj and the counties of Bereg, Szatmár, and Ugocsa were also granted to Bocskay, reverting to Austria if he died without heirs. Simultaneously, at Zsitvatorok, a peace agreement that confirmed the peace of Vienna was reached with the Turks. Bocskay survived this remarkable and unprecedented victory for only a few months. It is said he was poisoned (December 29, 1606) by his chancellor, Mihály Kátay, who was brutally killed by Bocskay’s supporters in the marketplace of Kassa.
See Political Correspondence of Stephen Bocskay (Hung.), edited by Károly Szábo (Budapest, 1882); Jenö Thury, Stephen Bocskay’s Rebellion (Hung.), Budapest, 1899.
See Political Correspondence of Stephen Bocskay (Hung.), edited by Károly Szábo (Budapest, 1882); Jenö Thury, Stephen Bocskay’s Rebellion (Hung.), Budapest, 1899.
BODE, JOHANN ELERT (1747-1826), German astronomer, was born at Hamburg on the 19th of January 1747. Devoted to astronomy from his earliest years, he eagerly observed the heavens at a garret window with a telescope made by himself, and at nineteen began his career with the publication of a short work on the solar eclipse of the 5th of August 1766. This was followed by an elementary treatise on astronomy entitled Anleitung zur Kenntniss des gestirnten Himmels (1768, 10th ed. 1844), the success of which led to his being summoned to Berlin in 1772 for the purpose of computing ephemerides on an improved plan. There resulted the foundation by him, in 1774, of the well-known Astronomisches Jahrbuch, 51 yearly volumes of which he compiled and issued. He became director of the Berlin observatory in 1786, withdrew from official life in 1825, and died at Berlin on the 23rd of November 1826. His works were highly effective in diffusing throughout Germany a taste for astronomy. Besides those already mentioned he wrote:— Sammlung astronomischer Tafeln (3 vols., 1776); Erläuterung der Sternkunde (1776, 3rd ed. 1808); Uranographia (1801), a collection of 20 star-maps accompanied by a catalogue of 17,240 stars and nebulae. In one of his numerous incidental essays he propounded, in 1776, a theory of the solar constitution similar to that developed in 1795 by Sir William Herschel. He gave currency, moreover, to the empirical rule known as “Bode’s Law,” which was actually announced by Johann Daniel Titius of Wittenberg in 1772. It is expressed by the statement that the proportionate distances of the several planets from the sun may be represented by adding 4 to each term of the series; 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, &c. The irregularity will be noticed of the first term, which should be 1½ instead of 0. (See Solar System.)
BODE, JOHANN ELERT (1747-1826), German astronomer, was born in Hamburg on January 19, 1747. He dedicated himself to astronomy from a young age, eagerly observing the sky from a garret window with a telescope he made himself. At nineteen, he began his career by publishing a short work on the solar eclipse of August 5, 1766. This was followed by a basic treatise on astronomy titled Anleitung zur Kenntniss des gestirnten Himmels (1768, 10th ed. 1844), which was successful and led to his move to Berlin in 1772 to calculate ephemerides using an improved method. In 1774, he established the well-known Astronomisches Jahrbuch, for which he compiled and published 51 yearly volumes. He became the director of the Berlin observatory in 1786, retired from official duties in 1825, and passed away in Berlin on November 23, 1826. His works significantly helped spread an interest in astronomy throughout Germany. In addition to those mentioned, he wrote: Sammlung astronomischer Tafeln (3 vols., 1776); Erläuterung der Sternkunde (1776, 3rd ed. 1808); Uranographia (1801), a collection of 20 star maps with a catalog of 17,240 stars and nebulae. In one of his many essays, he proposed in 1776 a theory of solar structure similar to what Sir William Herschel developed in 1795. He also popularized the empirical rule known as "Bode’s Law," which was actually introduced by Johann Daniel Titius of Wittenberg in 1772. This rule states that the relative distances of the planets from the sun can be represented by adding 4 to each term of the series; 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, etc. The first term is irregular, as it should be 1½ instead of 0. (See Solar System.)
See J.F. Encke, Berlin Abhandlungen (1827), p. xi.; H.C. Schumacher. Astr. Nach. v. 255, 367 (1827); Poggendorff, Biog. literarisches Handwörterbuch; Allgemeine deutsche Biographie, iii. 1.
See J.F. Encke, Berlin Abhandlungen (1827), p. xi.; H.C. Schumacher. Astr. Nach. v. 255, 367 (1827); Poggendorff, Biog. literarisches Handwörterbuch; Allgemeine deutsche Biographie, iii. 1.
BODEL, JEHAN (died c. 1210), French trouvère, was born at Arras in the second half of the 12th century. Very little is known of his life, but in 1205 he was about to start for the crusade when he was attacked by leprosy. In a touching poem called Le Congé (pr. by Méon in Recueil de fabliaux et contes, vol. i.), he bade farewell to his friends and patrons, and begged for a nomination to a leper hospital. He wrote Le Jeu de Saint Nicolas, one of the earliest miracle plays preserved in French (printed in Monmerqué and Michel’s Théâtre français du moyen âge, 1839, and for the Soc. des bibliophiles français, 1831); the Chanson des Saisnes (ed. F. Michel 1839), four pastourelles (printed in K. Bartsch’s Altfranz. Romanzen und Pastourellen, Leipzig, 1870); and probably, the eight fabliaux attributed to an unknown Jean Bedel. The legend of Saint Nicholas had already formed the subject of the Latin Ludus Sancti Nicholai of Hilarius. Bodel placed the scene partly on a field of battle in Africa, where the crusaders perish in a hopeless struggle, and partly in a tavern. The piece, loosely connected by the miracle of Saint Nicholas narrated in the prologue, ends with a wholesale conversion of the African king and his subjects. The dialogue in the tavern scenes is written in thieves’ slang, and is very obscure. The Chanson des Saisnes, Bodel’s authorship of which has been called in question, is a chanson de geste belonging to the period of decadence, and is really a roman d’aventures based on earlier legends belonging to the Charlemagne cycle. It relates the wars of Charlemagne against the Saxons under Guiteclin de Sassoigne (Witikind or Widukind), with the second revolt of the Saxons and their final submission and conversion. Jehan Bodel makes no allusion to Ogier the Dane and many other personages of the Charlemagne cycle, but he mentions the defeat of Roland at Roncevaux. The romance is based on historical fact, but is overlaid with romantic detail. It really embraces three distinct legends—those of the wars against the Saxons, of Charlemagne’s rebellious barons, and of Baudouim and Sebille. The earlier French poems on the subject are lost, but the substance of them is preserved in the Scandinavian versions of the Charlemagne cycle (supposed to have been derived from English sources) known as the Karlamagnussaga (ed. Unger, Christiania, 1860) and Keiser Karl Magnus Krönike (Romantisk Digtnung, ed. C.J. Brandt, Copenhagen, 1877).
BODEL, JEHAN (died c. 1210), French trouvère, was born in Arras in the late 12th century. Very little is known about his life, but in 1205 he was about to go on a crusade when he was struck by leprosy. In a heartfelt poem called Le Congé (published by Méon in Recueil de fabliaux et contes, vol. i.), he said goodbye to his friends and patrons, and asked for a place in a leper hospital. He wrote Le Jeu de Saint Nicolas, one of the earliest miracle plays preserved in French (printed in Monmerqué and Michel’s Théâtre français du moyen âge, 1839, and for the Soc. des bibliophiles français, 1831); the Chanson des Saisnes (edited by F. Michel 1839), four pastourelles (printed in K. Bartsch’s Altfranz. Romanzen und Pastourellen, Leipzig, 1870); and probably the eight fabliaux attributed to an unknown Jean Bedel. The legend of Saint Nicholas was already the subject of the Latin Ludus Sancti Nicholai by Hilarius. Bodel set his play partly on a battlefield in Africa, where the crusaders face a hopeless struggle, and partly in a tavern. The story, loosely connected by the miracle of Saint Nicholas told in the prologue, concludes with the mass conversion of the African king and his people. The dialogue in the tavern scenes is written in thieves’ slang and is quite obscure. The Chanson des Saisnes, whose authorship by Bodel has been questioned, is a chanson de geste from the period of decline, and is essentially a roman d’aventures based on earlier legends related to the Charlemagne cycle. It tells of Charlemagne's wars against the Saxons led by Guiteclin de Sassoigne (Witikind or Widukind), detailing the second Saxon revolt and their eventual defeat and conversion. Jehan Bodel does not mention Ogier the Dane and many other figures from the Charlemagne cycle, but he does refer to Roland's defeat at Roncevaux. The romance is rooted in historical events, but embellished with romantic elements. It actually includes three distinct legends: the wars against the Saxons, the rebellious barons of Charlemagne, and the tales of Baudouim and Sebille. The earlier French poems on these topics are lost, but their essence is preserved in the Scandinavian versions of the Charlemagne cycle (believed to have come from English sources) known as the Karlamagnussaga (edited by Unger, Christiania, 1860) and Keiser Karl Magnus Krönike (Romantisk Digtnung, edited by C.J. Brandt, Copenhagen, 1877).
See also the article on Jehan Bodel by Paulin Paris in Hist. litt, de la France, xx. pp. 605-638; Gaston Paris, Histoire poétique de Charlemagne (1865); Léon Gautier, Les Épopées françaises (revised edition, vol. iii. pp. 650-684), where there is a full analysis of the Chanson des Saisnes and a bibliography; H. Meyer, in Ausgaben und Abhandlungen aus ... der romanischen Philologie (Marburg, 1883), pp. 1-76, where its relation to the rest of the Charlemagne cycle is discussed.
See also the article on Jehan Bodel by Paulin Paris in Hist. litt, de la France, xx. pp. 605-638; Gaston Paris, Histoire poétique de Charlemagne (1865); Léon Gautier, Les Épopées françaises (revised edition, vol. iii. pp. 650-684), where you'll find a complete analysis of the Chanson des Saisnes and a bibliography; H. Meyer, in Ausgaben und Abhandlungen aus ... der romanischen Philologie (Marburg, 1883), pp. 1-76, which discusses its connection to the rest of the Charlemagne cycle.
BODENBACH (Czech Podmokly), a town of Bohemia, Austria, 83 m. N.N.E. of Prague by rail. Pop. (1900) 10,782, almost exclusively German. It is situated on the left bank of the Elbe opposite Tetschen, and is an important railway junction, containing also an Austrian and a Saxon custom-house. Bodenbach, which in the middle of the 19th century had only a few hundred inhabitants, has become a very important industrial centre. Its principal manufactures include cotton and woollen goods, earthenware and crockery, chemicals, chicory, chocolate, sweetmeats and preserves, and beer. It has also a very active transit trade.
BODENBACH (Czech Podmokly), a town in Bohemia, Austria, is located 83 m. N.N.E. of Prague by rail. Its population in 1900 was 10,782, almost entirely German. The town sits on the left bank of the Elbe River opposite Tetschen and serves as an important railway junction, which also includes an Austrian and a Saxon customs house. Bodenbach, which had only a few hundred residents in the mid-19th century, has grown into a significant industrial center. Its main products include cotton and wool goods, pottery and crockery, chemicals, chicory, chocolate, confections, preserves, and beer. It also has a very active transit trade.
BODENSTEDT, FRIEDRICH MARTIN VON (1819-1892), German author, was born at Peine, in Hanover, on the 22nd of April 1819. He studied in Göttingen, Munich and Berlin. His career was determined by his engagement in 1841 as tutor in the family of Prince Gallitzin at Moscow, where he gained a thorough knowledge of Russian. This led to his appointment in 1844 as the head of a public school at Tiflis, in Transcaucasia. He took the opportunity of his proximity to Persia to study Persian literature, and in 1851 published a volume of original poetry in oriental guise under the fanciful title, Die Lieder des Mirza Schaffy (English trans. by E. d’Esterre, 1880). The success of this work can only be compared with that of Edward FitzGerald’s Omar Khayyam, produced in somewhat similar circumstances, but differed from it in being immediate. It has gone through 160 editions in Germany, and has been translated into almost all literary languages. Nor is this celebrity undeserved, for although Bodenstedt does not attain the poetical elevation of FitzGerald, his view of life is wider, more cheerful and more sane, while the execution is a model of grace. On his return from the East, Bodenstedt engaged for a while in journalism, married the daughter of a Hessian officer (Matilde, the Edlitam of his poems), and was in 1854 appointed professor of Slavonic at Munich. The rich stores of knowledge which Bodenstedt brought back from the East were turned to account in two important books, Die Völker des Kaukasus und ihre Freiheits-Kämpfe gegen die Russen (1848), and Tausend und ein Tag im Orient (1850). For some time Bodenstedt continued to devote himself to Slavonic subjects, producing translations of Pushkin, Lermontov, Turgweniev, and of the poets of the Ukraines, and writing a tragedy on the false Demetrius, and an epic, Ada die Lesghierin, on a Circassian theme. Finding, probably, this vein exhausted, he exchanged his professorship in 1858 for one of Early English literature, and published (1858-1860) a valuable work on the English dramatists contemporary with Shakespeare, with copious translations. In 1862 he produced a standard translation of Shakespeare’s sonnets, and between 1866 and 1872 published a complete version of the plays, with the help of many coadjutors. In 1867 he undertook the direction of the court theatre at Meiningen, and was ennobled by the duke. After 1873 he lived successively at Altona, Berlin and Wiesbaden, where he died on the 19th of April 1892. His later works consist of an autobiography (1888), successful translations from Hafiz and Omar Khayyam, and lyrics and dramas which added little to his reputation.
BODENSTEDT, FRIEDRICH MARTIN VON (1819-1892), German author, was born in Peine, Hanover, on April 22, 1819. He studied in Göttingen, Munich, and Berlin. His career was shaped in 1841 when he became a tutor for Prince Gallitzin’s family in Moscow, where he learned Russian thoroughly. This led to his appointment in 1844 as the head of a public school in Tiflis, Transcaucasia. He took the chance to study Persian literature due to his closeness to Persia and published a volume of original poetry with an Eastern flair in 1851 titled Die Lieder des Mirza Schaffy (English trans. by E. d’Esterre, 1880). The success of this work can only be matched by Edward FitzGerald’s Omar Khayyam, created under similar circumstances, but it was more immediate. It has gone through 160 editions in Germany and has been translated into nearly every literary language. This fame is well-deserved; although Bodenstedt may not reach the poetic heights of FitzGerald, his outlook on life is broader, more optimistic, and more rational, while his execution is a model of elegance. After returning from the East, Bodenstedt worked in journalism for a while, married the daughter of a Hessian officer (Matilde, the Edlitam of his poems), and was appointed professor of Slavonic studies in Munich in 1854. The vast knowledge Bodenstedt returned with from the East was utilized in two significant books, Die Völker des Kaukasus und ihre Freiheits-Kämpfe gegen die Russen (1848) and Tausend und ein Tag im Orient (1850). For some time, Bodenstedt continued focusing on Slavonic subjects, translating works by Pushkin, Lermontov, Turgenev, and poets from Ukraine, and writing a tragedy about the false Demetrius, along with an epic, Ada die Lesghierin, based on a Circassian theme. Likely finding this area tapped out, he switched his professorship in 1858 to Early English literature and published (1858-1860) a valuable work on English dramatists contemporary with Shakespeare, including extensive translations. In 1862, he produced a standard translation of Shakespeare’s sonnets, and from 1866 to 1872, he published a complete version of the plays, with contributions from various collaborators. In 1867, he took on the role of director of the court theatre in Meiningen and was honored with nobility by the duke. After 1873, he lived in Altona, Berlin, and Wiesbaden, where he died on April 19, 1892. His later works include an autobiography (1888), successful translations from Hafiz and Omar Khayyam, and lyrics and dramas that contributed little to his reputation.
An edition of his collected works in 12 vols. was published at Berlin (1866-1869), and his Erzahlungen und Romane at Jena (1871-1872). For further biographical details, see Bodenstedt’s Erinnerungen aus meinem Leben (2 vols., Berlin, 1888-1890); and G. Schenck, Friedrich von Bodenstedt. Ein Dichterleben in seinen Briefen (Berlin, 1893).
An edition of his collected works in 12 volumes was published in Berlin (1866-1869), and his Erzahlungen und Romane was published in Jena (1871-1872). For more biographical details, see Bodenstedt’s Erinnerungen aus meinem Leben (2 vols., Berlin, 1888-1890); and G. Schenck, Friedrich von Bodenstedt. Ein Dichterleben in seinen Briefen (Berlin, 1893).
BODHI VAMSA, a prose poem in elaborate Sanskritized Pali, composed by Upatissa in the reign of Mahinda IV. of Ceylon about A.D. 980. It is an adaptation of a previously existing work in Sinhalese on the same subject, and describes the bringing of a branch of the celebrated Bo or Bodhi tree (i.e. Wisdom Tree, under which the Buddha had attained wisdom) to Ceylon in the 3rd century B.C. The Bodhi Vamsa quotes verses from the Mahavamsa, but draws a great deal of its material from other sources; and it has occasionally preserved details of the older tradition not found in any other sources known to us.
Bodhi Vamsa, is a prose poem written in elaborate Sanskritized Pali, created by Upatissa during the reign of Mahinda IV of Ceylon around CE 980. It is based on an earlier work in Sinhalese covering the same topic and tells the story of how a branch of the famous Bo or Bodhi tree (the Wisdom Tree under which Buddha reached enlightenment) was brought to Ceylon in the 3rd century BCE The Bodhi Vamsa quotes verses from the Mahavamsa, but also draws a lot of its content from other sources, occasionally preserving details of the older tradition that we can't find in any other known sources.
Edition in Pali for the Pali Text Society by S. Arthur Strong (London, 1891).
Edition in Pali for the Pali Text Society by S. Arthur Strong (London, 1891).
BODICHON, BARBARA LEIGH SMITH (1827-1891), English educationalist, was born at Watlington, Norfolk, on the 8th of April 1827, the daughter of Benjamin Smith (1783-1860), long M.P. for Norwich. She early showed a force of character and catholicity of sympathy that later won her a prominent place among philanthropists and social workers. In 1857 she married an eminent French physician, Dr Eugene Bodichon, and, although wintering many years in Algiers, continued to lead the movements she had initiated in behalf of Englishwomen. In 1869 she published her Brief Summary of the Laws of England concerning Women, which had a useful effect in helping forward the passage of the Married Women’s Property Act. In 1866, co-operating with Miss Emily Davies, she matured a scheme for the extension of university education to women, and the first small experiment at Hitchin developed into Girton College, to which Mme Bodichon gave liberally of her time and money. With all her public interests she found time for society and her favourite art of painting. She studied under William H. Hunt, and her water-colours, exhibited at the Salon, the Academy and elsewhere, showed great originality and talent, and were admired by Corot and Daubigny. Her London salon included many of the literary and artistic celebrities of her day; she was George Eliot’s most intimate friend, and, according to her, the first to recognize the authorship of Adam Bede. Her personal appearance is said to be described in that of Romola. Mme Bodichon died at Robertsbridge, Sussex, on the 11th of June 1891.
Bodichon, Barbara Leigh Smith (1827-1891), an English educator, was born in Watlington, Norfolk, on April 8, 1827, the daughter of Benjamin Smith (1783-1860), who served as M.P. for Norwich for a long time. She exhibited a strong character and broad sympathy early on, earning her a notable position among philanthropists and social activists. In 1857, she married Dr. Eugene Bodichon, a distinguished French physician, and despite spending many winters in Algiers, she continued to lead the initiatives she had started for English women. In 1869, she published her Brief Summary of the Laws of England concerning Women, which significantly contributed to the passage of the Married Women’s Property Act. In 1866, collaborating with Miss Emily Davies, she developed a plan to extend university education to women, with the initial small experiment at Hitchin evolving into Girton College, to which Mme Bodichon generously contributed her time and resources. Amidst her public engagements, she also made time for socializing and her passion for painting. She studied under William H. Hunt, and her watercolors, showcased at the Salon, the Academy, and elsewhere, displayed remarkable originality and skill, earning admiration from Corot and Daubigny. Her London salon hosted many literary and artistic figures of her time; she was George Eliot’s closest friend and reportedly the first to recognize Eliot as the author of Adam Bede. Her personal appearance is said to be reflected in Romola. Mme Bodichon passed away in Robertsbridge, Sussex, on June 11, 1891.
BODIN, JEAN (1530-1596), French political philosopher, was born at Angers in 1530. Having studied law at Toulouse and lectured there on jurisprudence, he settled in Paris as an advocate, but soon applied himself to literature. In 1555 he published his first work, a translation of Oppian’s Cynegeticon into Latin verse, with a commentary. The celebrated scholar, Turnebus, complained that some of his emendations had been appropriated without acknowledgment. In 1588, in refutation of the views of the seigneur de Malestroit, comptroller of the mint, who maintained that there had been no rise of prices in France during the three preceding centuries, he published his Responsio ad Paradoxa Malestretti (Réponse aux paradoxes de M. Malestroit), which the first time explained in a nearly satisfactory manner the revolution of prices which took place in the 16th century. Bodin showed a more rational appreciation than many of his contemporaries of the causes of this revolution, and the relation of the variations in money to the market values of wares in general as well as to the wages of labour. He saw that the amount of money in circulation did not constitute the wealth of the community, and that the prohibition of the export of the precious metals was rendered inoperative by the necessities of trade. This tract, the Discours sur les causes de l’extèrme cherté qui èst aujourdhuy en France (1574), and the disquisition on public revenues in the sixth book of the République, entitle Bodin to a distinguished position among the earlier economists.
BODIN, JEAN (1530-1596), a French political philosopher, was born in Angers in 1530. After studying law in Toulouse and giving lectures on jurisprudence there, he moved to Paris to work as an advocate but soon focused on literature. In 1555, he published his first work, a Latin verse translation of Oppian’s Cynegeticon, along with a commentary. The well-known scholar, Turnebus, noted that some of his revisions had been used without proper credit. In 1588, to counter the claims made by seigneur de Malestroit, the comptroller of the mint, who argued that prices in France hadn't increased over the past three centuries, he published his Responsio ad Paradoxa Malestretti (Réponse aux paradoxes de M. Malestroit), which for the first time explained the price changes that happened in the 16th century in a fairly satisfactory way. Bodin had a more rational understanding than many of his contemporaries regarding the reasons behind these changes, as well as the relationship between money fluctuations, market values of goods, and labor wages. He recognized that the amount of money in circulation didn't equal the wealth of the community and that the ban on exporting precious metals was ineffective due to commercial needs. This work, along with the Discours sur les causes de l’extèrme cherté qui èst aujourdhuy en France (1574) and his discussion on public revenues in the sixth book of the République, establishes Bodin’s prominent status among early economists.
His learning, genial disposition, and conversational powers won him the favor of Henry III. and of his brother, the duc d’Alençon; and he was appointed king’s attorney at Laon in 1576. In this year he married, performed his most brilliant service to his country, and completed his greatest literary work. Elected by the tiers état of Vermandois to represent it in the states-general of Blois, he contended with skill and boldness in extremely difficult circumstances for freedom of conscience, justice and peace. The nobility and clergy favoured the League, and urged the king to force his subjects to profess the Catholic religion. When Bodin found he could not prevent this resolution being carried, he contrived to get inserted in the petition drawn up by the states the clause “without war,” which practically rendered nugatory all its other clauses. While he thus resisted the clergy and nobility he successfully opposed the demand of the king to be allowed to alienate the public lands and royal demesnes, although the chief deputies had been won over to assent. This lost him the favour of the king, who wanted money on any terms. In 1581 he acted as secretary to the duc d’Alençon 110 when that prince came over to England to seek the hand of Queen Elizabeth. Here he had the pleasure of finding that the République was studied at London and Cambridge, although in a barbarous Latin translation. This determined him to translate his work into Latin himself (1586). The latter part of Bodin’s life was spent at Laon, which he is said to have persuaded to declare for the League in 1589, and for Henry IV. five years afterwards. He died of the plague in 1596, and was buried in the church of the Carmelites.
His knowledge, friendly nature, and conversational skills earned him the favor of Henry III and his brother, the Duke of Alençon. He was appointed as the king’s attorney in Laon in 1576. That year, he got married, delivered his most outstanding service to his country, and completed his most significant literary work. Elected by the *tiers état* of Vermandois to represent them in the states-general of Blois, he skillfully and boldly advocated for freedom of conscience, justice, and peace in very challenging circumstances. The nobility and clergy supported the League and pressured the king to make his subjects adopt the Catholic religion. When Bodin realized he could not stop this resolution from being passed, he cleverly got a clause included in the petition drafted by the states, stating “without war,” which effectively nullified all the other clauses. While resisting the clergy and nobility, he also successfully opposed the king's request to sell off public lands and royal estates, even though the main deputies had agreed to it. This lost him the king's favor, who needed money at any cost. In 1581, he served as the secretary to the Duke of Alençon when the prince came to England to seek Queen Elizabeth's hand in marriage. There, he was pleased to discover that the *République* was studied in London and Cambridge, albeit in a rather poor Latin translation. This inspired him to translate his work into Latin himself in 1586. The latter part of Bodin's life was spent in Laon, where he is said to have swayed it to support the League in 1589 and Henry IV five years later. He died of the plague in 1596 and was buried in the Church of the Carmelites.
With all his breadth and liberality of mind Bodin was a credulous believer in witchcraft, the virtues of numbers and the power of the stars, and in 1580 he published the Démonomanie des sorciers, a work which shows that he was not exempt from the prejudices of the age. Himself regarded by most of his contemporaries as a sceptic, and by some as an atheist, he denounced all who dared to disbelieve in sorcery, and urged the burning of witches and wizards. It might, perhaps, have gone hard with him if his counsel had been strictly followed, as he confessed to have had from his thirty-seventh year a friendly demon, who, if properly invoked, touched his right ear when he purposed doing what was wrong, and his left when he meditated doing good.
With all his open-mindedness and generosity of thought, Bodin was a gullible believer in witchcraft, the significance of numbers, and the influence of the stars. In 1580, he published the Démonomanie des sorciers, a work that reveals he was not free from the biases of his time. While most of his contemporaries viewed him as a skeptic and some considered him an atheist, he condemned anyone who dared to doubt sorcery and advocated for the execution of witches and wizards. It might have turned out badly for him if his advice had been strictly followed, as he admitted to having a friendly demon since his thirty-seventh year, who, if properly called upon, would touch his right ear when he was about to do something wrong and his left when he was planning to do something good.
His chief work, the Six livres de la République (Paris, 1576), which passed through several editions in his lifetime, that of 1583 having as an appendix L’Apologie de René Herpin (Bodin himself), was the first modern attempt to construct an elaborate system of political science. It is perhaps the most important work of its kind between Aristotle and modern writers. Though he was much indebted to Aristotle he used the material to advantage, adding much from his own experience and historical knowledge. In harmony with the conditions of his age, he approved of absolute governments, though at the same time they must, he thought, be controlled by constitutional laws. He entered into an elaborate defence of individual property against Plato and More, rather perhaps because the scheme of his work required the treatment of that theme than because it was practically urgent in his day, when the excesses of the Anabaptists had produced a strong feeling against communistic doctrines. He was under the general influence of the mercantilist views, and approved of energetic governmental interference in industrial matters, of high taxes on foreign manufactures and low duties on raw materials and articles of food, and attached great importance to a dense population. But he was not a blind follower of the system; he wished for unlimited freedom of trade in many cases; and he was in advance of his more eminent contemporary Montaigne in perceiving that the gain of one nation is not necessarily the loss of another. To the public finances, which he called “the sinews of the state,” he devoted much attention, and insisted on the duties of the government in respect to the right adjustment of taxation. In general he deserves the praise of steadily keeping in view the higher aims and interests of society in connexion with the regulation and development of its material life.
His main work, the Six livres de la République (Paris, 1576), went through several editions during his lifetime, with the 1583 edition including an appendix titled L’Apologie de René Herpin (Bodin himself). This was the first modern effort to create a detailed system of political science and is arguably the most significant work of its kind between Aristotle and contemporary writers. While he owed much to Aristotle, he effectively utilized the material, adding a great deal from his own experiences and historical insights. Reflecting the conditions of his time, he supported absolute governments, but believed they should also be regulated by constitutional laws. He passionately defended individual property against the ideas of Plato and More, possibly because his work's structure necessitated such a discussion rather than it being an urgent issue at the time, as the excesses of the Anabaptists had created a strong aversion to communal ideologies. He was generally influenced by mercantilist ideas, endorsing active government involvement in industry, advocating high taxes on foreign goods while favoring low tariffs on raw materials and food items, and emphasizing the importance of a dense population. However, he was not a blind advocate of this system; he desired unrestricted trade in many cases and was ahead of his more famous contemporary Montaigne in recognizing that one nation's gain does not automatically mean another's loss. He paid considerable attention to public finances, referring to them as “the sinews of the state,” and insisted on the government's responsibilities regarding proper tax adjustment. Overall, he deserves recognition for consistently considering the broader goals and interests of society in relation to the management and advancement of its material life.
Among his other works are Oratio de instituenda in republica juventate (1559); Methodus ad facilem historiarum cognitionem (1566); Universale Naturae Theatrum (1596, French trans. by Fougerolles, 1597), and the Colloquium Heptaplomeres de abditis rerum sublimium arcanis, written in 1588, published first by Guhrauer (1841), and in a complete form by L. Noack (1857). The last is a philosophy of naturalism in the form of a conversation between seven learned men—a Jew, a Mahommedan, a Lutheran, a Zwinglian, a Roman Catholic, an Epicurean and a Theist. The conclusion to which they are represented as coming is that they will live together in charity and toleration, and cease from further disputation as to religion. It is curious that Leibnitz, who originally regarded the Colloquium as the work of a professed enemy of Christianity, subsequently described it as a most valuable production (cf. M. Carrière, Weltanschauung, p. 317).
Among his other works are Oratio de instituenda in republica juventate (1559); Methodus ad facilem historiarum cognitionem (1566); Universale Naturae Theatrum (1596, French trans. by Fougerolles, 1597), and the Colloquium Heptaplomeres de abditis rerum sublimium arcanis, written in 1588, published first by Guhrauer (1841), and in a complete form by L. Noack (1857). The last is a philosophy of naturalism in the form of a conversation between seven knowledgeable men—a Jewish person, a Muslim, a Lutheran, a Zwinglian, a Roman Catholic, an Epicurean, and a Theist. They ultimately decide to live together in kindness and tolerance and to stop further arguments about religion. It’s interesting that Leibnitz, who initially thought the Colloquium was created by someone openly hostile to Christianity, later called it a very important work (cf. M. Carrière, Weltanschauung, p. 317).
See H. Baudrillart, J. Bodin et son temps (Paris, 1853); Ad. Franck, Réformateurs et publicistes de l’Europe (Paris, 1864); N. Planchenault, Études sur Jean Bodin (Angers, 1858); E. de Barthélemy, Étude sur J. Bodin (Paris, 1876); for the political philosophy of Bodin, see P. Janet, Hist. de la science polit. (3rd ed., Paris, 1887); Hancke, B. Studien über d. Begriff d. Souveränität (Breslau, 1894), A. Bardoux. Les Légistes et leur influence sur la soc. française; Fournol, Bodin prédécesseur de Montesquieu (Paris, 1896); for his political economy, J.K. Ingram, Hist. of Pol. Econ. (London, 1888); for his ethical teaching, A. Desjardins, Les Moralistes français du seizième siècle, ch. v.; and for his historical views, R. Flint’s Philosophy of History in Europe (ed. 1893), pp. 190 foll.
See H. Baudrillart, J. Bodin et son temps (Paris, 1853); Ad. Franck, Réformateurs et publicistes de l’Europe (Paris, 1864); N. Planchenault, Études sur Jean Bodin (Angers, 1858); E. de Barthélemy, Étude sur J. Bodin (Paris, 1876); for the political philosophy of Bodin, see P. Janet, Hist. de la science polit. (3rd ed., Paris, 1887); Hancke, B. Studien über d. Begriff d. Souveränität (Breslau, 1894), A. Bardoux. Les Légistes et leur influence sur la soc. française; Fournol, Bodin prédécesseur de Montesquieu (Paris, 1896); for his political economy, J.K. Ingram, Hist. of Pol. Econ. (London, 1888); for his ethical teaching, A. Desjardins, Les Moralistes français du seizième siècle, ch. v.; and for his historical views, R. Flint’s Philosophy of History in Europe (ed. 1893), pp. 190 foll.
BODKIN (Early Eng. boydekin, a dagger, a word of unknown origin, possibly connected with the Gaelic biodag, a short sword), a small, needle-like instrument of steel or bone with a flattened knob at one end, used in needlework. It has one or more slits or eyes, through which cord, tape or ribbon can be passed, for threading through a hem or series of loops. The word is also used of a small piercing instrument for making holes in cloth, &c.
BODKIN (Early Eng. boydekin, a dagger, a word of unknown origin, possibly linked to the Gaelic biodag, meaning short sword), is a small, needle-like tool made of steel or bone with a flat knob at one end, used in sewing. It has one or more slits or eyes, allowing you to pass cord, tape, or ribbon through it for threading a hem or a series of loops. The term is also used for a small tool that makes holes in fabric, etc.
BODLE or Boddle (said to be from Bothwell, the name of a mint-master), a Scottish copper coin worth about one-sixth of an English penny, first issued under Charles II. It survives in the phrase “not to care a bodle.”
BODLE or Boodle (believed to come from Bothwell, the name of a mint-master), is a Scottish copper coin valued at about one-sixth of an English penny, first introduced during the reign of Charles II. It is still found in the expression “not to care a bodle.”
BODLEY, GEORGE FREDERICK (1827-1907), English architect, was the youngest son of a physician at Brighton, his elder brother, the Rev. W.H. Bodley, becoming a well-known Roman Catholic preacher and a professor at Oscott. He was articled to the famous architect Sir Gilbert Scott, under whose influence he became imbued with the spirit of the Gothic revival, and he gradually became known as the chief exponent of 14th-century English Gothic, and the leading ecclesiastical architect in England. One of his first churches was St Michael and All Angels, Brighton (1855), and among his principal erections may be mentioned All Saints, Cambridge; Eton Mission church, Hackney Wick; Clumber church; Eccleston church; Hoar Cross church; St Augustine’s, Pendlebury; Holy Trinity, Kensington; Chapel Allerton, Leeds; St Faith’s, Brentford; Queen’s College chapel, Cambridge; Marlborough College chapel; and Burton church. His domestic work included the London School Board offices, the new buildings at Magdalen, Oxford, and Hewell Grange (for Lord Windsor). From 1872 he had for twenty years the partnership of Mr T. Garner, who worked with him. He also designed (with his pupil James Vaughan) the cathedral at Washington, D.C., U.S.A., and cathedrals at San Francisco and in Tasmania; and when Mr Gilbert Scott’s design for his new Liverpool cathedral was successful in the competition he collaborated with the young architect in preparing for its erection. Bodley began contributing to the Royal Academy in 1854, and in 1881 was elected A.R.A., becoming R.A. in 1902. In addition to being a most learned master of architecture, he was a beautiful draughtsman, and a connoisseur in art; he published a volume of poems in 1899; and he was a designer of wall-papers and chintzes for Watts & Co., of Baker Street, London; in early life he had been in close alliance with the Pre-Raphaelites, and he did a great deal, like William Morris, to improve public taste in domestic decoration and furniture. He died on the 21st of October 1907, at Water Eaton, Oxford.
Bodley, George Frederick (1827-1907), English architect, was the youngest son of a doctor in Brighton. His older brother, the Rev. W.H. Bodley, became a well-known Roman Catholic preacher and a professor at Oscott. He trained under the famous architect Sir Gilbert Scott, who influenced him to embrace the Gothic revival. Bodley became recognized as the leading expert in 14th-century English Gothic architecture and the top ecclesiastical architect in England. One of his earliest churches was St Michael and All Angels in Brighton (1855), and his noteworthy projects include All Saints in Cambridge, Eton Mission Church in Hackney Wick, Clumber Church, Eccleston Church, Hoar Cross Church, St Augustine’s in Pendlebury, Holy Trinity in Kensington, Chapel Allerton in Leeds, St Faith’s in Brentford, Queen’s College Chapel in Cambridge, Marlborough College Chapel, and Burton Church. His work in domestic architecture included the London School Board offices, new buildings at Magdalen College in Oxford, and Hewell Grange for Lord Windsor. From 1872, he shared a partnership with Mr. T. Garner for twenty years. He also designed (along with his student James Vaughan) the cathedral in Washington, D.C., and cathedrals in San Francisco and Tasmania. When Mr. Gilbert Scott's design won the competition for the new Liverpool Cathedral, Bodley collaborated with the young architect on its construction. Bodley began contributing to the Royal Academy in 1854 and was elected A.R.A. in 1881 before becoming R.A. in 1902. In addition to being a highly knowledgeable master of architecture, he was an excellent draftsman and an art connoisseur. He published a volume of poems in 1899 and designed wallpapers and chintzes for Watts & Co. on Baker Street, London. In his early life, he was closely associated with the Pre-Raphaelites and, like William Morris, greatly contributed to enhancing public taste in home decoration and furniture. He died on October 21, 1907, in Water Eaton, Oxford.
BODLEY, SIR THOMAS (1545-1613), English diplomatist and scholar, founder of the Bodleian library, Oxford, was born at Exeter on the 2nd of March 1545. During the reign of Queen Mary, his father, John Bodley, being obliged to leave the kingdom on account of his Protestant principles, went to live at Geneva. In that university, in which Calvin and Beza were then teaching divinity, young Bodley studied for a short time. On the accession of Queen Elizabeth he returned with his father to England, and soon after entered Magdalen College, Oxford. In 1563 he took his B.A. degree, and was admitted a fellow of Merton College. In 1565 he read a Greek lecture in hall, took his M.A. degree the year after, and read natural philosophy in the public schools. In 1569 he was proctor, and for some time after was deputy public orator. Quitting Oxford in 1576, he made the tour of Europe; shortly after his return he became gentleman-usher to Queen Elizabeth; and in 1587, apparently, he married Ann Ball, a widow lady of considerable fortune, the daughter of a Mr Carew of Bristol. In 1584 he entered parliament as member for Portsmouth, and represented St German’s in 1586. In 1585 Bodley was entrusted 111 with a mission to form a league between Frederick II. of Denmark and certain German princes to assist Henry of Navarre. He was next despatched on a secret mission to France; and in 1588 he was sent to the Hague as minister, a post which demanded great diplomatic skill, for it was in the Netherlands that the power of Spain had to be fought. The essential difficulties of his mission were complicated by the intrigues of the queen’s ministers at home, and Bodley repeatedly begged that he might be recalled. He was finally permitted to return to England in 1596, but finding his preferment obstructed by the jarring interests of Burleigh and Essex, he retired from public life. He was knighted on the 18th of April 1604. He is, however, remembered specially as the founder of the Bodleian at Oxford, practically the earliest public library in Europe (see Libraries). He determined, he said, “to take his farewell of state employments and to set up his staff at the library door in Oxford.” In 1598 his offer to restore the old library was accepted by the university. Bodley not only used his private fortune in his undertaking, but induced many of his friends to make valuable gifts of books. In 1611 he began its permanent endowment, and at his death in London on the 28th of January 1613, the greater part of his fortune was left to it. He was buried in the choir of Merton College chapel where a monument of black and white marble was erected to him.
BODLEY, SIR THOMAS (1545-1613), an English diplomat and scholar, was the founder of the Bodleian Library in Oxford. He was born in Exeter on March 2, 1545. During Queen Mary's reign, his father, John Bodley, had to leave the country because of his Protestant beliefs and settled in Geneva. There, where Calvin and Beza were teaching theology, young Bodley studied briefly. When Queen Elizabeth came to the throne, he returned to England with his father and soon joined Magdalen College, Oxford. In 1563, he earned his B.A. degree and became a fellow at Merton College. By 1565, he was giving Greek lectures in the hall, received his M.A. degree the following year, and taught natural philosophy in public schools. In 1569, he served as proctor and later as deputy public orator. After leaving Oxford in 1576, he traveled around Europe. Shortly after his return, he became a gentleman usher to Queen Elizabeth, and in 1587, he seemingly married Ann Ball, a wealthy widow and daughter of Mr. Carew from Bristol. He entered parliament in 1584 as a representative for Portsmouth and represented St. German’s in 1586. In 1585, Bodley was tasked with forming an alliance between Frederick II of Denmark and several German princes to support Henry of Navarre. He was later sent on a secret mission to France; and in 1588, he became minister at The Hague, a role that required significant diplomatic skill due to the conflict with Spain in the Netherlands. His mission faced additional challenges due to the political maneuvering of the queen’s ministers back home, and Bodley often asked to be recalled. He was finally allowed to return to England in 1596 but found his progress stalled by the conflicting interests of Burleigh and Essex, leading him to withdraw from public life. He was knighted on April 18, 1604. However, he is particularly remembered as the founder of the Bodleian Library in Oxford, which is regarded as one of the earliest public libraries in Europe (see Libraries). He declared his intention “to say goodbye to state affairs and to establish his staff at the library door in Oxford.” In 1598, the university accepted his proposal to restore the old library. Bodley not only used his personal wealth for this project but also encouraged many friends to donate valuable books. In 1611, he started its permanent endowment, and at his death in London on January 28, 1613, he bequeathed most of his fortune to it. He was buried in the choir of Merton College chapel, where a monument of black and white marble was erected in his honor.
Sir Thomas wrote his own life to the year 1609, which, with the first draft of the statutes drawn up for the library, and his letters to the librarian, Thomas James, was published by Thomas Hearne, under the title of Reliquiae Bodleianae, or Authentic Remains of Sir Thomas Bodley (London, 1703, 8vo).
Sir Thomas wrote his own autobiography up to the year 1609, which, along with the initial draft of the library statutes and his letters to the librarian, Thomas James, was published by Thomas Hearne under the title of Reliquiae Bodleianae, or Authentic Remains of Sir Thomas Bodley (London, 1703, 8vo).
BODMER, JOHANN JAKOB (1698-1783), Swiss-German author, was born at Greifensee, near Zürich, on the 19th of July 1698. After first studying theology and then trying a commercial career, he finally found his vocation in letters. In 1725 he was appointed professor of Helvetian history in Zürich, a chair which he held for half a century, and in 1735 became a member of the “Grosser Rat.” He published (1721-1723), in conjunction with J.J. Breitinger (1701-1774) and several others, Die Discourse der Mahlern, a weekly journal after the model of the Spectator. Through his prose translation of Milton’s Paradise Lost (1732) and his successful endeavours to make a knowledge of English literature accessible to Germany, he aroused the hostile criticism of Gottsched (q.v.) and his school, a struggle which ended in the complete discomfiture of the latter. His most important writings are the treatises Von dem Wunderbaren in der Poesie (1740) and Kritische Betrachtungen über die poetischen Gemälde der Dichter (1741), in which he pleaded for the freedom of the imagination from the restriction imposed upon it by French pseudo-classicism. Bodmer’s epics Die Sündfluth (1751) and Noah (1751) are weak imitations of Klopstock’s Messias, and his plays are entirely deficient in dramatic qualities. He did valuable service to German literature by his editions of the Minnesingers and part of the Nibelungenlied. He died at Zürich on the 2nd of January 1783.
BODMER, JOHANN JAKOB (1698-1783), Swiss-German author, was born in Greifensee, near Zürich, on July 19, 1698. After initially studying theology and attempting a business career, he ultimately discovered his true calling in writing. In 1725, he was appointed professor of Helvetian history in Zürich, a position he held for fifty years, and in 1735, he became a member of the “Grosser Rat.” He published (1721-1723), alongside J.J. Breitinger (1701-1774) and several others, Die Discourse der Mahlern, a weekly magazine modeled after the Spectator. His prose translation of Milton’s Paradise Lost (1732) and his efforts to make English literature more accessible to Germany sparked negative criticism from Gottsched (q.v) and his followers, culminating in their total defeat. His most significant works include the essays Von dem Wunderbaren in der Poesie (1740) and Kritische Betrachtungen über die poetischen Gemälde der Dichter (1741), in which he advocated for the freedom of imagination from the constraints imposed by French pseudo-classicism. Bodmer’s epics Die Sündfluth (1751) and Noah (1751) are weak imitations of Klopstock’s Messias, and his plays lack any dramatic qualities. He contributed valuable services to German literature through his editions of the Minnesingers and part of the Nibelungenlied. He died in Zürich on January 2, 1783.
See T.W. Danzel, Gottsched und seine Zeit (Leipzig, 1848); J. Crüger, J.C. Gottsched, Bodmer und Breitinger (Stuttgart, 1884); F. Braitmaier, Geschichte der poetischen Theorie und Kritik von den Diskursen der Maler bis auf Lessing (Leipzig, 1888); Denkschrift zu Bodmers 200. Geburtstag (Zürich, 1900).
See T.W. Danzel, Gottsched and His Time (Leipzig, 1848); J. Crüger, J.C. Gottsched, Bodmer and Breitinger (Stuttgart, 1884); F. Braitmaier, History of Poetic Theory and Criticism from the Discourses of the Painters to Lessing (Leipzig, 1888); Memorial for Bodmer's 200th Birthday (Zurich, 1900).
BODMIN, a market town and municipal borough in the Bodmin parliamentary division of Cornwall, England, the county town, 30½ m. W.N.W. of Plymouth, on branches of the Great Western and London & South-Western railways. Pop. (1901) 5353. It lies between two hills in a short valley opening westward upon that of the Camel, at the southern extremity of the high open Bodmin Moor. The large church of St Petrock, mainly Perpendicular, has earlier portions, and a late Norman font. East of it there is a ruined Decorated chapel of St Thomas of Canterbury, with a crypt. A tower of Tudor date, in the cemetery, marks the site of a chapel of the gild of the Holy Rood. Part of the buildings of a Franciscan friary, founded c. 1240, are incorporated in the market-house, and the gateway remains in an altered form. At Bodmin are a prison, with civil and naval departments, the county gaol and asylum, the headquarters of the constabulary, and those of the duke of Cornwall’s Light Infantry. Cattle, sheep and horse fairs are held, and there is a considerable agricultural trade. The borough is under a mayor, four aldermen and twelve councillors. Area, 2797 acres.
Bodmin, is a market town and municipal borough in the Bodmin parliamentary division of Cornwall, England's county town, located 30½ miles W.N.W. of Plymouth, on branches of the Great Western and London & South-Western railways. Population (1901) was 5,353. It sits between two hills in a short valley that opens westward onto the Camel Valley, at the southern edge of the high, open Bodmin Moor. The large church of St Petrock, mostly in the Perpendicular style, has older sections and a late Norman font. To the east, there is a ruined Decorated chapel of St Thomas of Canterbury, complete with a crypt. A Tudor-era tower in the cemetery marks the site of a chapel belonging to the gild of the Holy Rood. Some parts of a Franciscan friary, founded around 1240, are incorporated into the market house, and the gateway remains in a modified form. Bodmin is home to a prison with civil and naval departments, the county jail and asylum, the headquarters of the constabulary, and those of the Duke of Cornwall's Light Infantry. Cattle, sheep, and horse fairs are held, and there is significant agricultural trade. The borough is governed by a mayor, four aldermen, and twelve councillors. Area: 2,797 acres.
Traces of Roman occupation have been found in the western part of the parish, belonging to the first century A.D. Possibly tin-mining was carried on here at that period. The grant of a charter by King Edred to the prior and canons of Bodmin (Bomine, Bodman, Bodmyn) in respect of lands in Devonshire appears in an inspeximus of 1252. To its ecclesiastical associations it owed its importance at the time of the Domesday survey, when St Petrock held the manor of Bodmin, wherein were sixty-eight houses and one market. To successive priors, as mesne lords, it also owed its earliest municipal privileges. King John’s charter to the prior and convent, dated the 17th of July 1199, contained a clause (subsequently cancelled by Richard II.) by which burgesses were exempt from being impleaded, touching any tenements in their demesne, except before the king and his chief justice. Richard of Cornwall, king of the Romans, confirmed to the burgesses their gild merchant, Edward I. the pesage of tin, and Edward II. a market for tin and wool. Queen Elizabeth in 1563 constituted the town a free borough and the burgesses a body corporate, granting at the same time two fairs and a Saturday market. There are still held also three other fairs whose origin is uncertain. An amended charter granted in 1594 remained in force until 1789, when the corporation became extinct owing to the diminution of the burgesses. By virtue of a new charter of incorporation granted in 1798 and remodelled by the act of 1835, the corporation now consists of a mayor, four aldermen and twelve councillors. The first members for Bodmin were summoned in 1295. Retaining both its members in 1832, losing one in 1868 and the other in 1885, it has now become merged in the south-eastern division of the county. From 1715 to 1837 the assizes were generally held alternately at Launceston and Bodmin; since 1837 they have been held at Bodmin only. A court of probate has also been held at Bodmin since 1773. A festival known as “Bodmin Riding” was formerly celebrated here on the Sunday and Monday following St Thomas’s day (July 7). It is thought by some to have been instituted in 1177 to celebrate the recovery of the bones of St Petrock.
Traces of Roman occupation have been discovered in the western part of the parish, dating back to the first century A.D. Tin mining may have been conducted here during that time. King Edred granted a charter to the prior and canons of Bodmin (Bomine, Bodman, Bodmyn) regarding lands in Devonshire, which appears in an inspeximus from 1252. Its significance at the time of the Domesday survey came from its religious connections, as St. Petrock held the manor of Bodmin, which included sixty-eight houses and one market. The earliest municipal rights were also due to successive priors, who acted as mesne lords. King John’s charter to the prior and convent, dated July 17, 1199, included a clause (later annulled by Richard II) that exempted burgesses from being sued over any properties in their domain, except in front of the king and his chief justice. Richard of Cornwall, king of the Romans, confirmed the burgesses' gild merchant, while Edward I confirmed the pesage of tin, and Edward II established a market for tin and wool. In 1563, Queen Elizabeth designated the town as a free borough and the burgesses as a corporate body, granting them two fairs and a Saturday market. Three other fairs of uncertain origin are still held today. An updated charter issued in 1594 was in effect until 1789, when the corporation dissolved due to a decline in burgesses. A new incorporation charter was granted in 1798 and revised by the act of 1835, resulting in a corporation consisting of a mayor, four aldermen, and twelve councillors. The first representatives for Bodmin were called in 1295, retaining both until 1832, losing one in 1868 and the other in 1885, and it has now been merged into the southeastern division of the county. From 1715 to 1837, the assizes were generally held alternately at Launceston and Bodmin; since 1837, they have been held solely at Bodmin. A probate court has also operated at Bodmin since 1773. A festival known as “Bodmin Riding” was historically celebrated here on the Sunday and Monday following St. Thomas’s Day (July 7). Some believe it was established in 1177 to celebrate the recovery of St. Petrock’s bones.
See Victoria County History, Cornwall; John Maclean, Parochial and Family History of the Deanery of Trigg Minor, Cornwall (3 vols., 1873-1879).
See Victoria County History, Cornwall; John Maclean, Parochial and Family History of the Deanery of Trigg Minor, Cornwall (3 vols., 1873-1879).
BODÖ, a seaport on the north-western coast of Norway, in Nordland amt (county), lat. 67° 17′ N. Pop. (1900) 4827. The rock-bound harbour admits large vessels, and there is a brisk trade in fish and eider-down. The neighbouring country has many scenic attractions. Sixty miles inland (E.) rises the great massif of Sulitelma on the Swedish frontier, with its copper mines, broad snow-fields and glaciers. The fjords of the district include the imposing Beierenfjord, the Saltenfjord, and the Skjerstadfjord, at the narrow mouths of which, between islands, a remarkable cataract (Saltström) is formed at the turn of the tide. On this fjord is Skjerstad, a large scattered village.
BODÖ, is a seaport on the northwestern coast of Norway, in Nordland county, at latitude 67° 17′ N. The population in 1900 was 4,827. The rocky harbor can accommodate large ships, and there is a lively trade in fish and eiderdown. The surrounding area has many scenic attractions. Sixty miles inland to the east is the massive Sulitelma on the Swedish border, known for its copper mines, extensive snowfields, and glaciers. The fjords in the area include the impressive Beierenfjord, the Saltenfjord, and the Skjerstadfjord, where a remarkable waterfall (Saltström) forms at the narrow inlets between islands during the tide change. On this fjord is Skjerstad, a large, spread-out village.
BODONI, GIAMBATTISTA (1740-1813), Italian printer, was born in 1740 at Saluzzo in Piedmont, where his father owned a printing establishment. While yet a boy he began to engrave on wood. He at length went to Rome, and there became a compositor for the press of the Propaganda. He made himself acquainted with the Oriental languages, and thus was enabled to render essential service to the Propaganda press, by restoring and accurately distributing the types of several Oriental alphabets which had fallen into disorder. The infante Don Ferdinand, afterwards duke of Parma, having established, about 1760, a printing-house on the model of those in Paris, Madrid and Turin, Bodoni was placed at the head of this establishment, which he soon rendered the first of the kind in Europe. The beauty of his typography, &c., leaves nothing further to be desired; but the intrinsic value of his editions is seldom equal to their outward splendour. His Homer, however, is a truly magnificent work; and, indeed, his Greek letters are faultless imitations of the best 112 Greek manuscript. His editions of the Greek, Latin, Italian and French classics are all highly prized for their typographical elegance, and some of them are not less remarkable for their accuracy. Bodoni died at Padua in 1813. In 1818 a magnificent work appeared in two volumes quarto, entitled Manuale Tipografico, containing specimens of the vast collection of types which had belonged to him.
Bodoni, Giambattista (1740-1813), an Italian printer, was born in 1740 in Saluzzo, Piedmont, where his father owned a printing business. As a young boy, he started engraving on wood. Eventually, he moved to Rome and became a compositor for the Propaganda press. He learned Oriental languages, enabling him to provide crucial support to the Propaganda press by restoring and correctly distributing the types of several Oriental alphabets that had become disordered. In around 1760, Infante Don Ferdinand, who later became Duke of Parma, established a printing house modeled after those in Paris, Madrid, and Turin, appointing Bodoni to lead this establishment, which he quickly turned into the finest of its kind in Europe. The beauty of his typography and so on leaves nothing to be desired; however, the intrinsic value of his editions rarely matches their outward splendor. His edition of Homer, though, is truly magnificent; indeed, his Greek letters are flawless imitations of the best Greek manuscripts. His editions of Greek, Latin, Italian, and French classics are all highly valued for their typographical elegance, and some are even remarkable for their accuracy. Bodoni passed away in Padua in 1813. In 1818, a stunning work was published in two quarto volumes titled Manuale Tipografico, featuring specimens from his extensive collection of types.
See De Lama, Vita del Cavaliere Giambattista Bodoni (1816).
See De Lama, Vita del Cavaliere Giambattista Bodoni (1816).
BODY-SNATCHING, the secret disinterring of dead bodies in churchyards in order to sell them for the purpose of dissection. Those who practised body-snatching were frequently called resurrectionists or resurrection-men. Previous to the passing of the Anatomy Act 1832 (see Anatomy: History), no licence was required in Great Britain for opening an anatomical school, and there was no provision for supplying subjects to students for anatomical purposes. Therefore, though body-snatching was a misdemeanour at common law, punishable with fine and imprisonment, it was a sufficiently lucrative business to run the risk of detection. Body-snatching became so prevalent that it was not unusual for the relatives and friends of a deceased person to watch the grave for some time after burial, lest it should be violated. Iron coffins, too, were frequently used for burial, or the graves were protected by a framework of iron bars called mortsafes, well-preserved examples of which may still be seen in Greyfriars’ churchyard, Edinburgh.
BODY SNATCHING, the secret exhumation of bodies in churchyards to sell them for dissection. Those who engaged in body-snatching were often referred to as resurrectionists or resurrection-men. Before the Anatomy Act of 1832 (see Anatomy: History), there was no license required in Great Britain to open an anatomical school, and there were no regulations for providing subjects for anatomical study. Therefore, even though body-snatching was a misdemeanor under common law, punishable by fines and imprisonment, it was a profitable enough venture to justify the risk of getting caught. Body-snatching became so common that it wasn't unusual for the relatives and friends of a deceased person to guard the grave for some time after burial to prevent it from being disturbed. Iron coffins were also frequently used for burial, or the graves were secured with a framework of iron bars called mortsafes, well-preserved examples of which can still be seen in Greyfriars’ churchyard, Edinburgh.
For a detailed history of body-snatching, see The Diary of a Resurrectionist, edited by J.B. Bailey (London, 1896), which also contains a full bibliography and the regulations in force in foreign countries for the supply of bodies for anatomical purposes.
For a detailed history of body-snatching, see The Diary of a Resurrectionist, edited by J.B. Bailey (London, 1896), which also includes a complete bibliography and the current regulations in other countries regarding the supply of bodies for anatomical purposes.
BOECE (or Boyce), HECTOR (c. 1465-c. 1536), Scottish historian, was born at Dundee about the year 1465, being descended of a family which for several generations had possessed the barony of Panbride in Forfarshire. He received his early education at Dundee, and completed his course of study in the university of Paris, where he took the degree of B.D. He was appointed regent, or professor, of philosophy in the college of Montaigu; and there he was a contemporary of Erasmus, who in two epistles has spoken of him in the highest terms. When William Elphinstone, bishop of Aberdeen, was laying his plans for the foundation of the university of Aberdeen (King’s College) he made Boece his chief adviser; and the latter was persuaded, after receipt of the papal bull erecting the university (1494), to be the first principal. He was in Aberdeen about 1500 when lectures began in the new buildings, and he appears to have been well received by the canons of the cathedral, several of whom he has commemorated as men of learning. It was a part of his duty as principal to read lectures on divinity.
BOECE (or Boyfriend), HECTOR (c. 1465-c. 1536), a Scottish historian, was born in Dundee around 1465 and came from a family that had owned the barony of Panbride in Forfarshire for several generations. He received his early education in Dundee and completed his studies at the University of Paris, where he earned the degree of B.D. He was appointed as a regent or professor of philosophy at Montaigu College, where he was a contemporary of Erasmus, who praised him in two letters. When William Elphinstone, the Bishop of Aberdeen, was planning the foundation of the University of Aberdeen (King’s College), he chose Boece as his chief advisor. After receiving the papal bull establishing the university in 1494, Boece agreed to become its first principal. He was in Aberdeen around 1500 when lectures began in the new buildings, and he seems to have been well-received by the canons of the cathedral, several of whom he noted as learned individuals. As principal, one of his responsibilities was to deliver lectures on divinity.
The emoluments of his office were poor, but he also enjoyed the income of a canonry at Aberdeen and of the vicarage of Tullynessle. Under the date of 14th July 1527, we find a “grant to Maister Hector” of an annual pension of £50, to be paid by the sheriff of Aberdeen out of the king’s casualties; and on the 26th of July 1529 was issued a “precept for a lettre to Mr Hector Boys, professor of theology, of a pension of £50 Scots yearly, until the king promote him to a benefice of 100 marks Scots of yearly value; the said pension to be paid him by the custumars of Aberdeen.” In 1533 and 1534, one-half of his pension was, however, paid by the king’s treasurer, and the other half by the comptroller; and as no payment subsequent to that of Whitsuntide 1534 has been traced in the treasurer’s accounts, he is supposed to have obtained the benefice soon after that period. This benefice was the rectorship of Tyrie.
The salary from his position was low, but he also received income from a canonry at Aberdeen and the vicarage of Tullynessle. On July 14, 1527, there’s a record of a “grant to Master Hector” for an annual pension of £50, to be paid by the sheriff of Aberdeen using the king’s funds; and on July 26, 1529, a “precept for a letter to Mr. Hector Boys, professor of theology, for a yearly pension of £50 Scots, until the king promotes him to a benefice worth 100 marks Scots a year; this pension to be paid by the customs officers of Aberdeen.” In 1533 and 1534, though, half of his pension was paid by the king’s treasurer, with the other half covered by the comptroller; and since no payments after Whitsun 1534 have been found in the treasurer’s accounts, it’s believed he received the benefice shortly after that time. This benefice was the rectorship of Tyrie.
In 1528, soon after the publication of his history, Boece received the degree of D.D. at Aberdeen; and on this occasion the magistrates voted him a present of a tun of wine when the new wines should arrive, or, according to his option, the sum of £20 to purchase bonnets. He appears to have survived till the year 1536; for on the 22nd of November in that year, the king presented John Garden to the rectory of Tyrie, vacant by the death of “Mr Hector Boiss.” He died at Aberdeen, and was buried before the high altar at King’s College, beside the tomb of his patron Bishop Elphinstone.
In 1528, shortly after his history was published, Boece earned the degree of D.D. at Aberdeen. On this occasion, the local officials awarded him a gift of a tun of wine when the new wines arrived, or, if he preferred, a sum of £20 to buy bonnets. He seems to have lived until 1536; on November 22 of that year, the king appointed John Garden to the rectory of Tyrie, which was vacant due to the death of “Mr Hector Boiss.” He passed away in Aberdeen and was buried in front of the high altar at King’s College, next to the tomb of his patron Bishop Elphinstone.
His earliest publication, Episcoporum Murthlacensium et Aberdonensium per Hectorem Boetium Vitae, was printed at the press of Jodocus Badius (Paris, 1522). The notices of the early prelates are of little value, but the portion of the book in which he speaks of Bishop Elphinstone is of enduring merit. Here we likewise find an account of the foundation and constitution of the college, together with some notices of its earliest members. His fame rests chiefly on his History of Scotland, published in 1527 under the title Scotorum Historiae a prima gentis origine cum aliarum et rerum et gentium illustratione non vulgari. This edition contains seventeen books. Another edition, containing the eighteenth book and a fragment of the nineteenth, was published by Ferrerius, who has added an appendix of thirty-five pages (Paris, 1574).
His earliest publication, Episcoporum Murthlacensium et Aberdonensium per Hectorem Boetium Vitae, was printed by Jodocus Badius in Paris in 1522. The information about the early bishops is not very valuable, but the section where he discusses Bishop Elphinstone is quite significant. Here, we also find details about the foundation and structure of the college, along with some information about its earliest members. His reputation mainly comes from his History of Scotland, published in 1527 under the title Scotorum Historiae a prima gentis origine cum aliarum et rerum et gentium illustratione non vulgari. This edition has seventeen books. Another edition, which includes the eighteenth book and a fragment of the nineteenth, was published by Ferrerius, who added an appendix of thirty-five pages (Paris, 1574).
The composition of the history displays much ability; but Boece’s imagination was, however, stronger than his judgment: of the extent of the historian’s credulity, his narrative exhibits many unequivocal proofs; and of deliberate invention or distortion of facts not a few, though the latter are less flagrant and intentional than early 19th-century criticism has assumed. He professed to have obtained from the monastery of Icolmkill, through the good offices of the earl of Argyll, and his brother, John Campbell of Lundy, the treasurer, certain original historians of Scotland, and among the rest Veremundus, of whose writings not a single vestige is now to be found. In his dedication to the king he is pleased to state that Veremundus, a Spaniard by birth, was archdeacon of St Andrews, and that he wrote in Latin a history of Scotland from the origin of the nation to the reign of Malcolm III., to whom he inscribed his work. His propensity to the marvellous was at an early period exposed in the following verses by Leland:—
The writing of history shows a lot of skill; however, Boece’s imagination was stronger than his judgment. The extent of the historian’s gullibility is clear from his narrative, which contains many obvious signs of this, along with some intentional invention or distortion of facts, though the latter are less blatant and deliberate than early 19th-century critics suggested. He claimed to have received original historians of Scotland from the monastery of Icolmkill, through the help of the Earl of Argyll and his brother, John Campbell of Lundy, the treasurer, including Veremundus, whose writings are now completely missing. In his dedication to the king, he states that Veremundus, a Spaniard by birth, was the archdeacon of St Andrews and that he wrote a history of Scotland in Latin, covering the nation’s origins up to the reign of Malcolm III, to whom he dedicated his work. His tendency towards the fantastic was pointed out early on in the following verses by Leland:—
“Hectoris historici tot quot mendacia scripsit “Hectoris historici tot quot mendacia scripsit Si vis ut numerem, lector amice, tibi, Si vis ut numerem, lector amice, tibi, Me jubeas etiam fluctus numerare marinos Me jubeas etiam fluctus numerare marinos Et liquidi Stellas connumerare poli.” And count the stars of the sky. |
Boece’s History of Scotland was translated into Scottish prose by John Bellenden, and into verse by William Stewart. The Lives of the Bishops was reprinted for the Bannatyne Club, Edin., 1825, in a limited edition of sixty copies. A commonplace verse-rendering of the Life of Bishop Elphinstone, which was written by Alexander Gardyne in 1619, remains in MS. There is no modern edition of the history, though the versions of Bellenden and Stewart have been edited.
Boece’s History of Scotland was translated into Scottish prose by John Bellenden and into verse by William Stewart. The Lives of the Bishops was reprinted for the Bannatyne Club, Edinburgh, in 1825, in a limited edition of sixty copies. A basic verse adaptation of the Life of Bishop Elphinstone, written by Alexander Gardyne in 1619, still exists in manuscript form. There isn’t a modern edition of the history, though the versions by Bellenden and Stewart have been edited.
BOEHM, SIR JOSEPH EDGAR, Bart. (1834-1890), British sculptor, was born of Hungarian parentage on the 4th of July 1834 at Vienna, where his father was director of the imperial mint. After studying the plastic art in Italy and at Paris, he worked for a few years as a medallist in his native city. After a further period of study in England, he was so successful as an exhibitor at the Exhibition of 1862 that he determined to abandon the execution of coins and medals, and to give his mind to portrait busts and statuettes, chiefly equestrian. The colossal statue of Queen Victoria, executed in marble (1869) for Windsor Castle, and the monument of the duke of Kent in St George’s chapel, were his earliest great works, and so entirely to the taste of his royal patrons that he rose rapidly in favour with the court. He was made A.R.A. in 1878, and produced soon afterwards the statue of Carlyle on the Thames embankment at Chelsea. In 1881 he was appointed sculptor in ordinary to the queen, and in the ensuing year became full Academician. On the death of Dean Stanley, Boehm was commissioned to execute his sarcophagus in Westminster Abbey, and his achievement, a recumbent statue, has been pronounced to be one of the best portraits in modern sculpture. Less successful was his monument to General Gordon in St Paul’s cathedral. He executed the equestrian statue of the duke of Wellington at Hyde Park Corner, and designed the coinage for the Jubilee of Queen Victoria in 1887. Among his ideal subjects should be noted the “Herdsman and Bull.” He died suddenly in his studio at South Kensington on the 12th of December 1890.
BOEHM, SIR JOSEPH EDGAR, Bart. (1834-1890), was a British sculptor born to Hungarian parents on July 4, 1834, in Vienna, where his father was the director of the imperial mint. After studying sculpture in Italy and Paris, he spent a few years working as a medallist in his hometown. Following additional studies in England, he found success at the 1862 Exhibition, leading him to leave behind coin and medal production to focus on portrait busts and statuettes, primarily equestrian ones. His early major works include the colossal marble statue of Queen Victoria (1869) for Windsor Castle and the monument for the Duke of Kent at St George’s Chapel, which were so well-received by his royal patrons that he quickly gained favor at court. He became an Associate Royal Academy (A.R.A.) member in 1878 and subsequently created the statue of Carlyle on the Thames embankment in Chelsea. In 1881, he was appointed the sculptor in ordinary to the queen, and the following year, he became a full Academician. After Dean Stanley's death, Boehm was commissioned to create his sarcophagus in Westminster Abbey, and his reclining statue has been hailed as one of the best modern sculptures. However, his monument to General Gordon at St Paul’s Cathedral was less successful. He also created the equestrian statue of the Duke of Wellington at Hyde Park Corner and designed the coinage for Queen Victoria's Jubilee in 1887. Notable ideal subjects include “Herdsman and Bull.” He passed away suddenly in his studio at South Kensington on December 12, 1890.
BOEHM VON BAWERK, EUGEN (1851- ), Austrian economist and statesman, was born at Brünn on the 12th of February 1851. Entering the Austrian department of finance in 1872, he held various posts until 1880, when he became 113 qualified as a teacher of political economy in the university of Vienna. The following year, however, he transferred his services to the university of Innsbruck, where he became professor in 1884. In 1889 he became councillor in the ministry of finance, and represented the government in the Lower House on all questions of taxation. In 1895 and again in 1897-1898 he was minister of finance. In 1899 he was made a member of the Upper House, and in 1900 again became minister of finance. One of the leaders of the Austrian school of economists, he has made notable criticisms on the theory of value in relation to cost as laid down by the “classical school.” His more important works are Kapital und Kapitalzins (Innsbruck, 1884-1889), in two parts, translated by W. Smart, viz. Capital and Interest (part i., 1890), and The Positive Theory of Capital (part ii., 1891); Karl Marx and the Close of his System (trans. A.M. Macdonald, 1898); Recent Literature on Interest (trans. W.A. Scott and S. Feilbogen, 1903).
BOEHM VON BAWERK, EUGEN (1851- ), Austrian economist and statesman, was born in Brünn on February 12, 1851. He joined the Austrian department of finance in 1872 and held various positions until 1880, when he qualified as a teacher of political economy at the University of Vienna. However, the following year, he moved to the University of Innsbruck, where he became a professor in 1884. In 1889, he became a councillor in the ministry of finance, representing the government in the Lower House on all tax-related matters. He served as minister of finance in 1895 and again from 1897 to 1898. In 1899, he was appointed a member of the Upper House, and in 1900, he became minister of finance once more. As one of the leaders of the Austrian school of economists, he offered significant critiques of the value theory related to cost as proposed by the “classical school.” His major works include Kapital und Kapitalzins (Innsbruck, 1884-1889), in two parts, translated by W. Smart, namely Capital and Interest (part i., 1890) and The Positive Theory of Capital (part ii., 1891); Karl Marx and the Close of his System (translated by A.M. Macdonald, 1898); and Recent Literature on Interest (translated by W.A. Scott and S. Feilbogen, 1903).
BOEHME (or Behmen), JAKOB (1575-1624), German mystical writer, whose surname (of which Fechner gives eight German varieties) appears in English literature as Beem, Behmont, &c., and notably Behmen, was born at Altseidenberg, in Upper Lusatia, a straggling hamlet among the hills, some 10 m. S.E. of Görlitz. His father was a well-to-do peasant, and his first employment was that of herd boy on the Landskrone, a hill in the neighbourhood of Görlitz; the only education he received was at the town-school of Seidenberg, a mile from his home. Seidenberg, to this day, is filled with shoemakers, and to a shoemaker Jakob was apprenticed in his fourteenth year (1589), being judged not robust enough for husbandry. Ten years later (1599) we find him settled at Görlitz as master-shoemaker, and married to Katharina, daughter of Hans Kuntzschmann, a thriving butcher in the town. After industriously pursuing his vocation for ten years, he bought (1610) the substantial house, which still preserves his name, close by the bridge, in the Neiss-Vorstadt. Two or three years later he gave up business, and did not resume it as a shoemaker; but for some years before his death he made and sold woollen gloves, regularly visiting Prague fair for this purpose.
BOEHME (or Behmen), JAKOB (1575-1624), was a German mystical writer whose last name appears in English literature in various forms, including Beem, Behmont, and especially Behmen. He was born in Altseidenberg, a small village in Upper Lusatia, about 10 miles southeast of Görlitz. His father was a well-off farmer, and Jakob's first job was as a herd boy on the Landskrone, a nearby hill. The only education he received was at the town school in Seidenberg, which was a mile from his home. Even today, Seidenberg is known for its shoemakers, and Jakob was apprenticed to one at the age of fourteen (1589) because he was considered too frail for farming. Ten years later (1599), he was established as a master shoemaker in Görlitz, married to Katharina, the daughter of Hans Kuntzschmann, a successful butcher in the town. After working hard in his trade for ten years, he bought a substantial house in 1610, which still bears his name, located near the bridge in Neiss-Vorstadt. A couple of years later, he retired from shoemaking and, for several years leading up to his death, made and sold woolen gloves, regularly visiting the Prague fair for this purpose.
Boehme’s authorship began in his 37th year (1612) with a treatise, Aurora, oder die Morgenröte im Aufgang, which though unfinished was surreptitiously copied, and eagerly circulated in MS. by Karl von Ender. This raised him at once out of his homely sphere, and made him the centre of a local circle of liberal thinkers, considerably above him in station and culture. The charge of heresy was, however, soon directed against him by Gregorius Richter, then pastor primarius of Görlitz. Feeling ran so high after Richter’s pulpit denunciations, that, in July 1613, the municipal council, fearing a disturbance of the peace, made a show of examining Boehme, took possession of his fragmentary quarto, and dismissed the writer with an admonition to meddle no more with such matters. For five years he obeyed this injunction. But in 1618 began a second period of authorship; he poured forth, but did not publish, treatise after treatise, expository and polemical, in the next and the two following years. In 1622 he composed nothing but a few short pieces on true repentance, resignation, &c., which, however, devotionally speaking, are the most precious of all his writings. They were the only pieces offered to the public in his lifetime and with his permission, a fact which is evidence of the essentially religious and practical character of his mind. Their publication at Görlitz, on New Year’s day 1624, under the title of Der Weg zu Christo, was the signal for renewed clerical hostility. Boehme had by this time entered on the third and most prolific though the shortest period (1623-1624) of his speculation. His labours at the desk were interrupted in May 1624 by a summons to Dresden, where his famous “colloquy” with the Upper Consistorial court was made the occasion of a flattering but transient ovation on the part of a new circle of admirers. Richter died in August 1624, and Boehme did not long survive his pertinacious foe. Seized with a fever when away from home, he was with difficulty conveyed to Görlitz. His wife was at Dresden on business; and during the first week of his malady he was nursed by a literary friend. He died, after receiving the rites of the church, grudgingly administered by the authorities, on Sunday, the 17th of November.
Boehme started writing at the age of 37 (1612) with a treatise, Aurora, oder die Morgenröte im Aufgang, which, although incomplete, was secretly copied and widely shared in manuscript form by Karl von Ender. This immediately elevated him out of his ordinary life and made him the focal point of a local group of liberal thinkers who were significantly above him in status and education. However, the charge of heresy was soon brought against him by Gregorius Richter, who was then the primary pastor of Görlitz. Feelings ran so high after Richter’s sermons that, in July 1613, the municipal council, worried about potential unrest, pretended to investigate Boehme, took his incomplete quarto, and dismissed him with a warning to stop discussing such topics. He obeyed this order for five years. But in 1618, a second phase of his writing began; he produced many treatises, both explanatory and argumentative, in the next two years without publishing them. In 1622, he only wrote a few short pieces on true repentance, resignation, etc., which, in terms of devotion, are the most valuable of all his writings. These were the only works he offered to the public during his lifetime and with his permission, showing the fundamentally religious and practical nature of his thoughts. Their publication in Görlitz on New Year’s Day 1624, under the title Der Weg zu Christo, sparked renewed hostility from the clergy. By this time, Boehme had entered the third and most productive, though briefest, period (1623-1624) of his thinking. His writing was interrupted in May 1624 by a call to Dresden, where his famous "colloquy" with the Upper Consistorial Court led to a flattering but fleeting celebration from a new group of admirers. Richter passed away in August 1624, and Boehme did not long survive his persistent opponent. After falling ill with a fever while away from home, he was with difficulty taken back to Görlitz. His wife was in Dresden on business, and during the first week of his illness, a literary friend cared for him. He died after receiving church rites, begrudgingly given by the authorities, on Sunday, November 17th.
Boehme always professed that a direct inward opening or illumination was the only source of his speculative power. He pretended to no other revelation. Ecstatic raptures we should not expect, for he was essentially a Protestant mystic. No “thus saith the Lord” was claimed as his warrant, after the manner of Antoinette Bourignon, or Ludowick Muggleton; no spirits or angels held converse with him as with Swedenborg. It is needless to dwell, in the way either of acceptance or rejection, on the very few occasions in which his outward life seemed to him to come into contact with the invisible world. The apparition of the pail of gold to the herd boy on the Landskrone, the visit of the mysterious stranger to the young apprentice, the fascination of the luminous sheen, reflected from a common pewter dish, which first, in 1600, gave an intuitive turn to his meditations, the heavenly music which filled his ears as he lay dying—none of these matters is connected organically with the secret of his special power. The mysteries of which he discoursed were not reported to him: he “beheld” them. He saw the root of all mysteries, the Ungrund or Urgrund, whence issue all contrasts and discordant principles, hardness and softness, severity and mildness, sweet and bitter, love and sorrow, heaven and hell. These he “saw” in their origin; these he attempted to describe in their issue, and to reconcile in their eternal result. He saw into the being of God; whence the birth or going forth of the divine manifestation. Nature lay unveiled to him, he was at home in the heart of things. “His own book, which he himself was,” the microcosm of man, with his threefold life, was patent to his vision. Such was his own account of his qualification. If he failed it was in expression; he confessed himself a poor mouthpiece, though he saw with a sure spiritual eye.
Boehme always claimed that a direct inner opening or illumination was the only source of his reflective power. He didn't pretend to have any other revelation. We shouldn’t expect ecstatic experiences from him, as he was fundamentally a Protestant mystic. He didn't assert any “thus saith the Lord” to back himself up like Antoinette Bourignon or Ludowick Muggleton; no spirits or angels communicated with him as they did with Swedenborg. There's no need to focus on the few instances when his outer life seemed to touch the invisible world, whether to accept or reject them. The vision of the gold pail to the shepherd boy on the Landskrone, the visit from the mysterious stranger to the young apprentice, the captivating glow reflected from a normal pewter dish that first sparked his meditation in 1600, or the heavenly music that filled his ears as he lay dying—none of these things are fundamentally connected to the secret of his unique power. The mysteries he talked about weren’t revealed to him: he “beheld” them. He recognized the root of all mysteries, the Ungrund or Urgrund, from which all contrasts and conflicting principles emerge: hardness and softness, severity and gentleness, sweetness and bitterness, love and sorrow, heaven and hell. He “saw” these in their origins; he tried to describe them in their outcomes and reconcile them in their eternal results. He saw into the essence of God, from which the divine manifestation arises. Nature was laid bare to him; he felt at home in the core of reality. “His own book, which he himself was,” the microcosm of man with his threefold life, was clear to his vision. This was his own account of his abilities. If he struggled, it was in expression; he admitted he was a poor mouthpiece, even though he had a clear spiritual vision.
It must not be supposed that the form in which Boehme’s pneumatic realism worked itself out in detail was shaped entirely from within. In his writings we trace the influence of Theophr. Bombast von Hohenheim, known as Paracelsus (1493-1541), of Kaspar Schwenkfeld (1490-1561), the first Protestant mystic, and of Valentin Weigel (1533-1588). From the school of Paracelsus came much of his puzzling phraseology,—his Turba and Tinctur and so forth,—a phraseology embarrassing to himself as well as to his readers. His friends plied him with foreign terms, which he was delighted to receive, interpreting them by an instinct, and using them often in a corrupted form and always in a sense of his own. Thus the word Idea called up before him the image of “a very fair, heavenly, and chaste virgin.” The title Aurora, by which his earliest treatise is best known, was furnished by Dr Balthasar Walther. These, however, were false helps, which only serve to obscure a difficult study, like the Flagrat and Lubet, with which his English translator veiled Boehme’s own honest Schreck and Lust. There is danger lest his crude science and his crude philosophical vocabulary conceal the fertility of Boehme’s ideas and the transcendent greatness of his religious insight. Few will take the pains to follow him through the interminable account of his seven Quellgeister, which remind us of Gnosticism; or even of his three first properties of eternal nature, in which his disciples find Newton’s formulae anticipated, and which certainly bear a marvellous resemblance to the three ἀρχαί of Schelling’s Theogonische Natur. Boehme is always greatest when he breaks away from his fancies and his trammels, and allows speech to the voice of his heart. Then he is artless, clear and strong; and no man can help listening to him, whether he dive deep down with the conviction “ohne Gift und Grimm kein Leben,” or rise with the belief that “the being of all beings is a wrestling power,” or soar with the persuasion that Love “in its height is as high as God.” The mystical poet of Silesia, Angelus Silesius, discerned where Boehme’s truest power lay when he sang—
It shouldn't be assumed that the way Boehme's pneumatic realism developed was solely influenced from within. In his writings, we see the impact of Theophr. Bombast von Hohenheim, better known as Paracelsus (1493-1541), Kaspar Schwenkfeld (1490-1561), the first Protestant mystic, and Valentin Weigel (1533-1588). Much of his confusing terminology—his Turba and Tinctur, and so on—came from the Paracelsus school; this language was puzzling for both him and his readers. His friends would throw foreign terms at him, which he happily accepted, interpreting them instinctively, often using them in distorted forms and always in his own unique sense. For him, the word Idea conjured the image of “a very beautiful, heavenly, and chaste virgin.” The name Aurora, by which his earliest work is best known, was given by Dr. Balthasar Walther. However, these were misleading aids that only served to complicate a challenging study, much like the Flagrat and Lubet, which his English translator used to obscure Boehme’s honest Schreck and Lust. There’s a risk that Boehme's rough science and philosophical vocabulary mask the richness of his ideas and the profound depth of his religious insight. Few will bother to follow his lengthy account of his seven Quellgeister, reminiscent of Gnosticism; or even his three fundamental properties of eternal nature, where his followers find early versions of Newton’s formulas, which also bear a striking resemblance to the three ancient in Schelling’s Theogonische Natur. Boehme is at his best when he breaks free from his intricate ideas and constraints, allowing his heart to speak. In those moments, he is natural, clear, and powerful; listeners can't help but be drawn in, whether he dives deep with the conviction that “without poison and resentment, there is no life,” or rises with the belief that “the essence of all beings is a wrestling power,” or soars with the idea that Love “at its peak is as high as God.” The mystical poet of Silesia, Angelus Silesius, recognized where Boehme’s true strength lay when he proclaimed—
“Im Wasser lebt der Fisch, die Pflanze in der Erden, “Fish live in the water, plants in the earth, Der Vogel in der Luft, die Sonn’ am Firmament, Der Vogel in der Luft, die Sonne am Himmel, Der Salamander muss im Feu’r erhalten werden, Der Salamander muss im Feuer erhalten werden, Und Gottes Herz ist Jakob Böhme’s Element.” Und Gottes Herz ist Jakob Böhme’s Element. |
The three periods of Boehme’s authorship constitute three distinct stages in the development of his philosophy. He himself marks a threefold division of his subject-matter:—1. Philosophia, i.e. the pursuit of the divine Sophia, a study of God in himself; this was attempted in the Aurora. 2. Astrologia, i.e., in the largest sense, cosmology, the manifestation of the divine in the structure of the world and of man; hereto belong, with others, Die drei Principien göttlichen Wesens; Vom dreifachen Leben der Menschen; Von der Menschwerdung Christi;, Von der Geburt und Bezeichnung alter Wesen (known as Signatura Rerum). 3. Theologia, i.e., in Scougall’s phrase, “the life of God in the soul of man.” Of the speculative writings under this head the most important are Von der Gnadenwahl; Mysterium Magnum (a spiritual commentary on Genesis); Von Christi Testamenten (the Sacraments).
The three phases of Boehme’s work represent three different stages in the evolution of his philosophy. He himself identifies a three-part division of his topics: 1. Philosophy, meaning the pursuit of the divine Sophia, a study of God in his essence; this was attempted in the Aurora. 2. Astrology, meaning, in the broadest sense, cosmology, the expression of the divine in the structure of the world and humanity; this includes, among others, Die drei Principien göttlichen Wesens; Vom dreifachen Leben der Menschen; Von der Menschwerdung Christi; Von der Geburt und Bezeichnung alter Wesen (known as Signatura Rerum). 3. Theology, meaning, in Scougall’s words, “the life of God in the soul of man.” The most significant writings under this category are Von der Gnadenwahl; Mysterium Magnum (a spiritual commentary on Genesis); Von Christi Testamenten (the Sacraments).
Although Boehme’s philosophy is essentially theological, and his theology essentially philosophical, one would hardly describe him as a philosophical theologian; and, indeed, his position is not one in which either the philosopher or the theologian finds it easy to make himself completely at home. The philosopher finds no trace in Boehme of a conception of God which rests its own validity on an accord with the highest canons of reason or of morals; it is in the actual not in the ideal that Boehme seeks God, whom he discovers as the spring of natural powers and forces, rather than as the goal of advancing thought. The theologian is staggered by a language which breaks the fixed association of theological phrases, and strangely reversing the usual point of view, characteristically pictures God as underneath rather than above. Nature rises out of Him; we sink into Him. The Ungrund of the unmanifested Godhead is boldly represented in the English translations of Boehme by the word Abyss, in a sense altogether unexplained by its Biblical use. In the Theologia Germanica this tendency to regard God as the substantia, the underlying ground of all things, is accepted as a foundation for piety; the same view, when offered in the colder logic of Spinoza, is sometimes set aside as atheistical. The procession of spiritual forces and natural phenomena out of the Ungrund is described by Boehme in terms of a threefold manifestation, commended no doubt by the constitution of the Christian Trinity, but exhibited in a form derived from the school of Paracelsus. From Weigel he learned a purely idealistic explanation of the universe, according to which it is not the resultant of material forces, but the expression of spiritual principles. These two explanations were fused in his mind till they issued forth as equivalent forms of one and the same thought. Further, Schwenkfeld supplied him with the germs of a transcendental exegesis, whereby the Christian Scriptures and the dogmata of Lutheran orthodoxy were opened up in harmony with his new-found views. Thus equipped, Boehme’s own genius did the rest. A primary effort of Boehme’s philosophy is to show how material powers are substantially one with moral forces. This is the object with which he draws out the dogmatic scheme which dictates the arrangement of his seven Quellgeister. Translating Boehme’s thought out of the uncouth dialect of material symbols (as to which one doubts sometimes whether he means them as concrete instances, or as pictorial illustrations, or as a mere memoria technica), we find that Boehme conceives of the correlation of two triads of forces. Each triad consists of a thesis, an antithesis and a synthesis; and the two are connected by an important link. In the hidden life of the Godhead, which is at once Nichts and Alles, exists the original triad, viz. Attraction, Diffusion, and their resultant, the Agony of the unmanifested Godhead. The transition is made; by an act of will the divine Spirit comes to Light; and immediately the manifested life appears in the triad of Love, Expression, and their resultant, Visible Variety. As the action of contraries and their resultant are explained the relations of soul, body and spirit; of good, evil and free will; of the spheres of the angels, of Lucifer, and of this world. It is a more difficult problem to account on this philosophy for the introduction of evil. Boehme does not resort to dualism, nor has he the smallest sympathy with a pantheistic repudiation of the fact of sin. That the difficulty presses him is clear from the progressive changes in his attempted solution of the problem. In the Aurora nothing save good proceeds from the Ungrund, though there is good that abides and good that fall;—Christ and Lucifer. In the second stage of his writing the antithesis is directly generated as such; good and its contrary are coincidently given from the one creative source, as factors of life and movement; while in the third period evil is a direct outcome of the primary principle of divine manifestation—it is the wrath side of God. Corresponding to this change we trace a significant variation in the moral end contemplated by Boehme as the object of this world’s life and history. In the first stage the world is created in remedy of a decline; in the second, for the adjustment of a balance of forces; in the third, to exhibit the eternal victory of good over evil, of love over wrath.
Although Boehme's philosophy is fundamentally theological, and his theology is inherently philosophical, it's hard to label him as a philosophical theologian; in fact, neither the philosopher nor the theologian finds it easy to fully embrace his ideas. The philosopher notices that Boehme doesn't offer a concept of God that validates itself through the highest standards of reason or morality; instead, Boehme searches for God in the actual world rather than the ideal, discovering Him as the source of natural powers and forces, rather than the endpoint of evolving thought. The theologian is taken aback by a language that disrupts the standard associations of theological terms, and intriguingly flips the usual perspective, depicting God as beneath rather than above. Nature emerges from Him; we immerse ourselves in Him. The Ungrund of the unmanifested Godhead is boldly rendered in English translations of Boehme with the word Abyss, a meaning that isn't entirely explained by its Biblical context. In the Theologia Germanica, this tendency to see God as the substantia, the foundational essence of all things, is embraced as a basis for piety; however, this same perspective, when articulated through the more detached logic of Spinoza, is sometimes dismissed as atheistic. Boehme describes the emergence of spiritual forces and natural phenomena from the Ungrund in terms of a threefold manifestation, likely influenced by the structure of the Christian Trinity, yet presented in a form stemming from the Paracelsus school. From Weigel, he absorbed a purely idealistic interpretation of the universe, where it is seen not as a product of material forces, but as the expression of spiritual principles. These two interpretations combined in his mind until they became equivalent forms of the same thought. Additionally, Schwenkfeld introduced him to the seeds of a transcendental reading of scripture, allowing the Christian texts and the doctrines of Lutheran orthodoxy to be understood in line with his newfound views. With this foundation, Boehme's own insight completed the picture. A primary aim of Boehme's philosophy is to demonstrate how material powers are fundamentally linked to moral forces. This is the goal with which he develops the dogmatic framework that shapes the arrangement of his seven Quellgeister. When we translate Boehme’s ideas out of the awkward language of material symbols (where one sometimes wonders if he treats them as concrete examples, illustrative images, or merely as a memoria technica), we find that Boehme views the connection of two triads of forces. Each triad has a thesis, an antithesis, and a synthesis; and they are joined by a crucial link. In the hidden life of the Godhead, which is both Nichts and Alles, exists the original triad: Attraction, Diffusion, and their resultant, the Agony of the unmanifested Godhead. The transition occurs; through an act of will, the divine Spirit emerges into Light; and immediately the manifested life emerges in the triad of Love, Expression, and their resultant, Visible Variety. Explaining the interactions of opposites and their outcomes reveals the connections between soul, body, and spirit; good, evil, and free will; the realms of angels, Lucifer, and this world. It is a trickier issue to explain the introduction of evil within this philosophy. Boehme does not lean towards dualism and has no inclination towards a pantheistic denial of the reality of sin. It’s evident that the challenge weighs on him, as shown by the evolving changes in his attempts to solve the issue. In the Aurora, only good emerges from the Ungrund, though it includes both enduring good and transient good—Christ and Lucifer. In the next phase of his writing, the antithesis is generated directly as such; good and its opposite both arise from the single creative source as elements of life and movement; whereas in the third phase, evil directly results from the fundamental principle of divine manifestation—it represents the wrath aspect of God. Following this shift, we observe a meaningful change in the moral purpose Boehme envisions as the aim of life and history in this world. In the initial phase, the world is created to counteract a decline; in the second, to balance forces; in the third, to showcase the eternal triumph of good over evil, of love over wrath.
Editions of Boehme’s works were published by H. Betke (Amsterdam, 1675); by J.G. Gichtel (Amsterdam, 1682-1683, 10 vols.); by K.W. Schiebler (Leipzig, 1831-1847, 7 vols.). Translations of sundry treatises have been made into Latin (by J.A. Werdenhagen, 1632), Dutch (complete, by W. v. Bayerland, 1634-1641), and French (by Jean Macle, c. 1640, and L.C. de Saint-Martin, 1800-1809). Between 1644 and 1662 all Boehme’s works were translated by John Ellistone (d. 1652) and John Sparrow, assisted by Durand Hotham and Humphrey Blunden, who paid for the undertaking. At that time regular societies of Behmenists, embracing not only the cultivated but the vulgar, existed in England and in Holland. They merged into the Quaker movement, holding already in common with Friends that salvation is nothing short of the very presence and life of Christ in the believer, and only kept apart by an objective doctrine of the sacraments which exposed them to the polemic of Quakers (e.g. J. Anderdon). Muggleton led an anthropomorphic reaction against them, and between the two currents they were swept away. The Philadelphian Society at the beginning of the 18th century consisted of cultured mystics, Jane Lead, Pordage, Francis Lee, Bromley, &c., who fed upon Boehme. William Law (1686-1761) somewhat later recurred to the same spring, with the result, however, in those dry times of bringing his own good sense into question rather than of reviving the credit of his author. After Law’s death the old English translation was in great part re-edited (4 vols., 1762-1784) as a tribute to his memory, by George Ward and Thomas Langcake, with plates from the designs of D.A. Freher (Brit. Mus. Add. MSS. 5767-5794). This forms what is commonly called Law’s translation; to complete it a 5th vol. (12mo, Dublin, 1820) is needed.
Editions of Boehme’s works were published by H. Betke (Amsterdam, 1675); by J.G. Gichtel (Amsterdam, 1682-1683, 10 vols.); and by K.W. Schiebler (Leipzig, 1831-1847, 7 vols.). Translations of various treatises have been made into Latin (by J.A. Werdenhagen, 1632), Dutch (complete, by W. v. Bayerland, 1634-1641), and French (by Jean Macle, around 1640, and L.C. de Saint-Martin, 1800-1809). Between 1644 and 1662, all of Boehme’s works were translated by John Ellistone (d. 1652) and John Sparrow, with help from Durand Hotham and Humphrey Blunden, who funded the project. At that time, regular societies of Behmenists, including both the educated and the common people, existed in England and in Holland. They merged into the Quaker movement, which already shared the belief with Friends that salvation is nothing less than the very presence and life of Christ in the believer, and they differed only on an objective doctrine of the sacraments, which put them at odds with the Quakers (e.g., J. Anderdon). Muggleton led a reaction against them, and between the two opposing views, they were eventually swept away. The Philadelphian Society at the beginning of the 18th century was made up of cultured mystics like Jane Lead, Pordage, Francis Lee, Bromley, etc., who drew from Boehme’s works. William Law (1686-1761) later returned to the same source, but in those dry times, it mostly raised questions about his common sense rather than reviving his author's reputation. After Law’s death, the old English translation was largely re-edited (4 vols., 1762-1784) as a tribute to his memory by George Ward and Thomas Langcake, with plates based on designs by D.A. Freher (Brit. Mus. Add. MSS. 5767-5794). This forms what is commonly referred to as Law’s translation; to complete it, a 5th vol. (12mo, Dublin, 1820) is needed.
See also J. Hambetger, Die Lehre des deutschen Philosophen J. Boehmes (1844); Alb. Peip, J. Boehme der deutsche Philosoph (1860); von Harless, J. Boehme und die Alchimisten (1870, 2nd ed. 1882). For Boehme’s life see the Memoirs by Abraham von Frankenberg (d. 1652) and others, trans, by F. Okely (1870); La Motte Fouqué, J. Boehm, ein biographischer Denkstein (1831); H.A. Fechner, J. Boehme, sein Leben und seine Schriften (1857); H.L. Martensen, J. Boehme, Theosophiske Studier (Copenhagen, 1881; English trans. 1885); J. Claassen, J. Boehme, sein Leben und seine theosophische Werke (Güterslöh, 1885); P. Deussen, J. Boehme, über sein Leben und seine Philosophie (Kiel, 1897).
See also J. Hambetger, The Teachings of the German Philosopher J. Boehme (1844); Alb. Peip, J. Boehme the German Philosopher (1860); von Harless, J. Boehme and the Alchemists (1870, 2nd ed. 1882). For Boehme’s life, see the Memoirs by Abraham von Frankenberg (d. 1652) and others, translated by F. Okely (1870); La Motte Fouqué, J. Boehm, a Biographical Monument (1831); H.A. Fechner, J. Boehme, His Life and His Writings (1857); H.L. Martensen, J. Boehme, Theosophical Studies (Copenhagen, 1881; English translation 1885); J. Claassen, J. Boehme, His Life and His Theosophical Works (Güterslöh, 1885); P. Deussen, J. Boehme, About His Life and His Philosophy (Kiel, 1897).
BOEOTIA, a district of central Greece, stretching from Phocis and Locris in the W. and N. to Attica and Megaris in the S. between the strait of Euboea and the Corinthian Gulf. This area, amounting in all to 1100 sq. m., naturally falls into two main divisions. In the north the basin of the Cephissus and Lake Copaïs lies between parallel mountain-walls continuing eastward the line of Parnassus in the extensive ridge of Helicon, the “Mountain of the Muses” (5470 ft.) and the east Locrian range in Mts. Ptoüm, Messapium and other smaller peaks. These ranges, which mostly lie close to the seaboard, form by their projecting spurs a narrow defile on the Phocian frontier, near the famous battlefield of Chaeroneia, and shut in Copaïs closely on the south between Coronea and Haliartus. The north-east barrier was pierced by underground passages (katavothra) which carried off the overflow from Copaïs. The southern portion of the land forms a plateau which slopes to Mt. Cithaeron, the frontier range between Boeotia and Attica. Within this territory the low ridge of Teumessus separates the plain of Ismenus and Dirce, commanded by the citadel of Thebes, from the upland plain of the Asopus, the only Boeotian river that finds the eastern sea. Though the Boeotian climate suffered from the exhalations of Copaïs, which produced a heavy atmosphere with foggy winters and sultry summers, its rich soil was suited alike for crops, plantations and pasture; the Copaïs plain, though able to turn into marsh when the choking of the katavothra 115 caused the lake to encroach, being among the most fertile in Greece. The central position of Boeotia between two seas, the strategic strength of its frontiers and the ease of communication within its extensive area were calculated to enhance its political importance. On the other hand the lack of good harbours hindered its maritime development; and the Boeotian nation, although it produced great men like Pindar, Epaminondas, Pelopidas and Plutarch, was proverbially as dull as its native air. But credit should be given to the people for their splendid military qualities: both their cavalry and heavy infantry achieved a glorious record.
BOEOTIA, is a region in central Greece, bordered by Phocis and Locris to the west and north, and Attica and Megaris to the south, situated between the Euboea Strait and the Corinthian Gulf. This area, covering a total of 1100 square miles, divides naturally into two main parts. In the north, the basin of the Cephissus and Lake Copaïs is nestled between parallel mountain ranges that extend eastward from the Parnassus, including the extensive Helicon range, known as the “Mountain of the Muses” (5470 ft.), and the eastern Locrian range with Mountains Ptoüm, Messapium, and other smaller peaks. These mountain ranges, mostly located near the coastline, create a narrow pass on the Phocian border, near the famous battlefield of Chaeroneia, and closely surround Copaïs to the south between Coronea and Haliartus. The northeast barrier has underground passages (katavothra) that drain the excess water from Copaïs. The southern part of the region forms a plateau sloping toward Mt. Cithaeron, which marks the border between Boeotia and Attica. Within this territory, the low ridge of Teumessus separates the plains of Ismenus and Dirce, overlooked by the citadel of Thebes, from the elevated plain of the Asopus, the only river in Boeotia that flows into the eastern sea. Although the Boeotian climate was affected by the vapors from Copaïs, resulting in heavy air with foggy winters and muggy summers, its fertile soil was excellent for crops, orchards, and grazing; the Copaïs plain, while prone to becoming marshy when the katavothra blocked and allowed the lake to expand, was among the most productive in Greece. Boeotia’s central location between two seas, the strategic strength of its borders, and the ease of access within its vast area all enhanced its political significance. However, the lack of good harbors limited its maritime growth; and although the Boeotian nation produced notable figures like Pindar, Epaminondas, Pelopidas, and Plutarch, it was famously considered as dull as its native climate. Nonetheless, the people deserve recognition for their impressive military skills: both their cavalry and heavy infantry had a renowned record.
In the mythical days Boeotia played a prominent part. Of the two great centres of legends, Thebes with its Cadmean population figures as a military stronghold, and Orchomenus, the home of the Minyae, as an enterprising commercial city. The latter’s prosperity is still attested by its archaeological remains (notably the “Treasury of Minyas”) and the traces of artificial conduits by which its engineers supplemented the natural outlets. The “Boeotian” population seems to have entered the land from the north at a date probably anterior to the Dorian invasion. With the exception of the Minyae, the original peoples were soon absorbed by these immigrants, and the Boeotians henceforth appear as a homogeneous nation. In historical times the leading city of Boeotia was Thebes, whose central position and military strength made it a suitable capital. It was the constant ambition of the Thebans to absorb the other townships into a single state, just as Athens had annexed the Attic communities. But the outlying cities successfully resisted this policy, and only allowed the formation of a loose federation which in early times seems to have possessed a merely religious character. While the Boeotians, unlike the Arcadians, generally acted as a united whole against foreign enemies, the constant struggle between the forces of centralization and disruption perhaps went further than any other cause to check their development into a really powerful nation. Boeotia hardly figures in history before the late 6th century. Previous to this its people is chiefly known as the producer of a type of geometric pottery similar to the Dipylon ware of Athens. About 519 the resistance of Plataea to the federating policy of Thebes led to the interference of Athens on behalf of the former; on this occasion, and again in 507, the Athenians defeated the Boeotian levy. During the Persian invasion of 480, while some of the cities fought whole-heartedly in the ranks of the patriots, Thebes assisted the invaders. For a time the presidency of the Boeotian League was taken away from Thebes, but in 457 the Spartans reinstated that city as a bulwark against Athenian aggression. Athens retaliated by a sudden advance upon Boeotia, and after the victory of Oenophyta brought under its power the whole country excepting the capital. For ten years the land remained under Athenian control, which was exercised through the newly installed democracies; but in 447 the oligarchic majority raised an insurrection, and after a victory at Coronea regained their freedom and restored the old constitutions. In the Peloponnesian War the Boeotians, embittered by the early conflicts round Plataea, fought zealously against Athens. Though slightly estranged from Sparta after the peace of Nicias, they never abated their enmity against their neighbours. They rendered good service at Syracuse and Arginusae; but their greatest achievement was the decisive victory at Delium over the flower of the Athenian army (424), in which both their heavy infantry and their cavalry displayed unusual efficiency.
In ancient times, Boeotia was very important. Among the two major hubs of legends, Thebes, known for its Cadmean people, was a military stronghold, while Orchomenus, home of the Minyae, was a thriving commercial city. The prosperity of Orchomenus is still evidenced by its archaeological remains (especially the “Treasury of Minyas”) and the remnants of artificial water channels that its engineers created to enhance natural waterways. The “Boeotian” population appears to have migrated into the area from the north, likely before the Dorian invasion. Except for the Minyae, the original inhabitants were quickly absorbed by these newcomers, and the Boeotians then emerged as a unified nation. In historical times, Thebes was the leading city of Boeotia, its central location and military strength making it an ideal capital. The Thebans constantly aimed to unite the other towns into a single state, similar to how Athens incorporated the Attic communities. However, the surrounding cities successfully resisted this effort and formed a loose federation that initially seemed mainly religious. While the Boeotians generally acted together against foreign foes, unlike the Arcadians, the ongoing conflict between centralization and fragmentation likely hindered their growth into a truly powerful nation. Boeotia hardly appears in history before the late 6th century. Before this, its people were mainly recognized for producing a type of geometric pottery similar to Athens's Dipylon ware. Around 519, Plataea's resistance to Thebes' unification efforts led to Athens stepping in to assist Plataea; during this time, and again in 507, the Athenians defeated the Boeotian forces. During the Persian invasion in 480, while some cities fought wholeheartedly for the patriots, Thebes sided with the invaders. For a period, Thebes lost its leadership in the Boeotian League, but in 457, the Spartans restored its position as a defense against Athenian aggression. Athens retaliated with a sudden advance into Boeotia and, after the victory at Oenophyta, took control of the entire region except for the capital. For ten years, Athens ruled over the land, implementing new democratic systems; however, in 447, the oligarchic majority led a revolt and regained their freedom and the old constitutions after winning at Coronea. During the Peloponnesian War, the Boeotians, angered by the earlier battles around Plataea, fought fiercely against Athens. Although they were slightly distanced from Sparta after the peace of Nicias, they maintained their hostility toward their neighbors. They performed well at Syracuse and Arginusae, but their greatest accomplishment was their decisive victory at Delium over the elite of the Athenian army in 424, where both their heavy infantry and cavalry showed remarkable effectiveness.
About this time the Boeotian League comprised eleven groups of sovereign cities and associated townships, each of which elected one Boeotarch or minister of war and foreign affairs, contributed sixty delegates to the federal council at Thebes, and supplied a contingent of about a thousand foot and a hundred horse to the federal army. A safeguard against undue encroachment on the part of the central government was provided in the councils of the individual cities, to which all important questions of policy had to be submitted for ratification. These local councils, to which the propertied classes alone were eligible, were subdivided into four sections, resembling the prytaneis of the Athenian council, which took it in turns to take previous cognizance of all new measures.1
Around this time, the Boeotian League included eleven groups of independent cities and associated townships. Each group elected one Boeotarch, or minister of war and foreign affairs, contributed sixty delegates to the federal council in Thebes, and provided a contingent of about a thousand infantry and one hundred cavalry to the federal army. To prevent excessive interference from the central government, important policy decisions had to be approved by the councils of the individual cities. These local councils, which only the wealthy classes could join, were divided into four sections that operated similarly to the prytaneis of the Athenian council, taking turns reviewing all new proposals. 1
Boeotia took a prominent part in the war of the Corinthian League against Sparta, especially at Haliartus and Coronea (395-394). This change of policy seems due mainly to the national resentment against foreign interference. Yet disaffection against Thebes was now growing rife, and Sparta fostered this feeling by stipulating for the complete independence of all the cities in the peace of Antalcidas (387). In 374 Pelopidas restored the Theban dominion. Boeotian contingents fought in all the campaigns of Epaminondas, and in the later wars against Phocis (356-346); while in the dealings with Philip of Macedon the federal cities appear merely as the tools of Thebes. The federal constitution was also brought into accord with the democratic governments now prevalent throughout the land. The sovereign power was vested in the popular assembly, which elected the Boeotarchs (between seven and twelve in number), and sanctioned all laws. After the battle of Chaeroneia, in which the Boeotian heavy infantry once again distinguished itself, the land never rose again to prosperity. The destruction of Thebes by Alexander (335) seems to have paralysed the political energy of the Boeotians, though it led to an improvement in the federal constitution, by which each city received an equal vote. Henceforth they never pursued an independent policy, but followed the lead of protecting powers. Though the old military training and organization continued, the people proved unable to defend the frontiers, and the land became more than ever the “dancing-ground of Ares.” Though enrolled for a short time in the Aetolian League (about 245 B.C.) Boeotia was generally loyal to Macedonia, and supported its later kings against Rome. In return for the excesses of the democracies Rome dissolved the league, which, however, was allowed to revive under Augustus, and merged with the other central Greek federations in the Achaean synod. The death-blow to the country’s prosperity was given by the devastations during the first Mithradatic War.
Boeotia played a significant role in the war of the Corinthian League against Sparta, particularly at Haliartus and Coronea (395-394). This shift in policy seems to stem largely from national resentment towards foreign interference. However, discontent with Thebes was increasing, and Sparta encouraged this sentiment by demanding the complete independence of all the cities in the peace of Antalcidas (387). In 374, Pelopidas reestablished Theban control. Boeotian troops participated in all of Epaminondas's campaigns and in the later wars against Phocis (356-346); meanwhile, in interactions with Philip of Macedon, the federal cities appeared to serve only as instruments of Thebes. The federal constitution was also aligned with the democratic governments that were becoming common throughout the region. The sovereign power was held by the popular assembly, which elected the Boeotarchs (between seven and twelve in number) and approved all laws. After the battle of Chaeroneia, where the Boeotian heavy infantry once again stood out, the region never regained its former prosperity. The destruction of Thebes by Alexander (335) seems to have stunted the political vitality of the Boeotians, although it led to an improvement in the federal constitution, granting each city an equal vote. From that point on, they no longer pursued an independent policy and followed the direction of protective powers. Although the old military training and organization persisted, the people were unable to defend their borders, and the region became increasingly the “dancing-ground of Ares.” Although they were briefly part of the Aetolian League (about 245 B.C.), Boeotia generally remained loyal to Macedonia, supporting its later kings against Rome. In response to the excesses of the democracies, Rome dissolved the league, which, however, was permitted to revive under Augustus and merged with other central Greek federations in the Achaean synod. The country’s prosperity suffered severely due to the devastation during the first Mithridatic War.
Save for a short period of prosperity under the Frankish rulers of Athens (1205-1310), who repaired the katavothra and fostered agriculture, Boeotia long continued in a state of decay, aggravated by occasional barbarian incursions. The first step towards the country’s recovery was not until 1895, when the outlets of Copaïs were again put into working order. Since then the northern plain has been largely reclaimed for agriculture, and the natural riches of the whole land are likely to develop under the influence of the railway to Athens. Boeotia is at present a Nomos with Livadia (the old Turkish capital) for its centre; the other surviving townships are quite unimportant. The population (65,816 in 1907) is largely Albanian.
Except for a brief period of prosperity under the Frankish rulers of Athens (1205-1310), who repaired the katavothra and supported agriculture, Boeotia remained in a state of decline, worsened by occasional barbarian invasions. The first step towards the country’s recovery didn’t happen until 1895, when the outlets of Copaïs were restored. Since then, a large portion of the northern plain has been reclaimed for farming, and the natural resources of the entire region are likely to develop thanks to the railway connection to Athens. Boeotia is currently a Nomos with Livadia (the old Turkish capital) at its center; the other remaining towns are relatively minor. The population (65,816 in 1907) is mostly Albanian.
Authorities.—Thuc. iv. 76-101; Xenophon, Hellenica, iii.-vii.; Strabo, pp. 400-412; Pausanias ix.; Theopompus (or Cratippus) in the Oxyrhynchus Papyri, vol. v. (London, 1908), No. 842, col. 12; W.M. Leake, Travels in Northern Greece, chs. xi.-xix. (London, 1835); H.F. Tozer, Geography of Greece (London, 1873), pp. 233-238; W. Rhys Roberts, The Ancient Boeotians (Cambridge, 1895); E.A. Freeman. Federal Government (ed. 1893, London), ch. iv. § 2; B.V. Head, Historia Numorum, pp. 291 sqq. (Oxford, 1887); W. Larfeld, Sylloge Inscriptionum Boeoticarum (Berlin, 1883). (See also Thebes.)
References.—Thucydides, iv. 76-101; Xenophon, Hellenica, iii.-vii.; Strabo, pp. 400-412; Pausanias ix.; Theopompus (or Cratippus) in the Oxyrhynchus Papyri, vol. v. (London, 1908), No. 842, col. 12; W.M. Leake, Travels in Northern Greece, chs. xi.-xix. (London, 1835); H.F. Tozer, Geography of Greece (London, 1873), pp. 233-238; W. Rhys Roberts, The Ancient Boeotians (Cambridge, 1895); E.A. Freeman, Federal Government (ed. 1893, London), ch. iv. § 2; B.V. Head, Historia Numorum, pp. 291 sqq. (Oxford, 1887); W. Larfeld, Sylloge Inscriptionum Boeoticarum (Berlin, 1883). (See also Thebes.)
BOER, the Dutch form of the Eng. “boor,” in its original signification of husbandman (Ger. Bauer), a name given to the Dutch farmers of South Africa, and especially to the Dutch population of the Transvaal and Orange River States. (See South Africa and Transvaal.)
BOER, the Dutch term for "farmer," originally meaning husbandman (Ger. Bauer), refers to the Dutch farmers in South Africa, particularly those in the Transvaal and Orange River States. (See South Africa and Transvaal.)
BOERHAAVE, HERMANN (1668-1738), Dutch physician and man of science, was born at Voorhout near Leiden on the 31st of December 1668. Entering the university of Leiden he took his degree in philosophy in 1689, with a dissertation De distinctione mentis a corpore, in which he attacked the doctrines of Epicurus, Hobbes and Spinoza. He then turned to the study of medicine, in which he graduated in 1693 at Harderwyck in Guelderland. In 1701 he was appointed lecturer on the institutes 116 of medicine at Leiden; in his inaugural discourse, De commendando Hippocratis studio, he recommended to his pupils that great physician as their model. In 1709 he became professor of botany and medicine, and in that capacity he did good service, not only to his own university, but also to botanical science, by his improvements and additions to the botanic garden of Leiden, and by the publication of numerous works descriptive of new species of plants. In 1714, when he was appointed rector of the university, he succeeded Govert Bidloo (1649-1713) in the chair of practical medicine, and in this capacity he had the merit of introducing the modern system of clinical instruction. Four years later he was appointed also to the chair of chemistry. In 1728 he was elected into the French Academy of Sciences, and two years later into the Royal Society of London. In 1729 declining health obliged him to resign the chairs of chemistry and botany; and he died, after a lingering and painful illness, on the 23rd of September 1738 at Leiden. His genius so raised the fame of the university of Leiden, especially as a school of medicine, that it became a resort of strangers from every part of Europe. All the princes of Europe sent him disciples, who found in this skilful professor not only an indefatigable teacher, but an affectionate guardian. When Peter the Great went to Holland in 1715, to instruct himself in maritime affairs, he also took lessons from Boerhaave. His reputation was not confined to Europe; a Chinese mandarin wrote him a letter directed “To the illustrious Boerhaave, physician in Europe,” and it reached him in due course.
BOERHAAVE, HERMANN (1668-1738), Dutch physician and scientist, was born in Voorhout near Leiden on December 31, 1668. He entered Leiden University and earned his degree in philosophy in 1689, with a dissertation De distinctione mentis a corpore, where he critiqued the ideas of Epicurus, Hobbes, and Spinoza. He then shifted his focus to medicine, graduating in 1693 at Harderwyck in Guelderland. In 1701, he was appointed a lecturer on the principles of medicine at Leiden; in his inaugural speech, De commendando Hippocratis studio, he advised his students to look up to that great physician as their role model. In 1709, he became a professor of botany and medicine, significantly contributing to both his university and botanical science by enhancing the botanic garden of Leiden and publishing several works describing new plant species. In 1714, when appointed rector of the university, he took over the chair of practical medicine from Govert Bidloo (1649-1713), where he was credited with introducing the modern system of clinical instruction. Four years later, he also took on the chair of chemistry. In 1728, he was elected to the French Academy of Sciences, and two years later to the Royal Society of London. In 1729, declining health forced him to resign from his positions in chemistry and botany; he passed away after a long and painful illness on September 23, 1738, in Leiden. His brilliance greatly enhanced the reputation of Leiden University, particularly as a medical school, attracting students from all over Europe. Princes from various European countries sent their students to him, who found in this skilled professor not only a tireless teacher but also a caring mentor. When Peter the Great visited Holland in 1715 to learn about maritime affairs, he also took lessons from Boerhaave. His fame extended beyond Europe; a Chinese mandarin even wrote him a letter addressed “To the illustrious Boerhaave, physician in Europe,” which reached him in due time.
His principal works are—Institutiones medicae (Leiden, 1708); Aphorismi de cognoscendis et curandis morbis (Leiden, 1709), on which his pupil and assistant, Gerard van Swieten (1700-1772) published a commentary in 5 vols.; and Elementa chemiae (Paris, 1724).
His main works are—Institutiones medicae (Leiden, 1708); Aphorismi de cognoscendis et curandis morbis (Leiden, 1709), which his student and assistant, Gerard van Swieten (1700-1772), commented on in 5 volumes; and Elementa chemiae (Paris, 1724).
BOETHUS, a sculptor of the Hellenistic age, a native of Carthage (or possibly Chalcedon). His date cannot be accurately fixed, but was probably the 2nd century B.C. He was noted for his representations of children, in dealing with whom earlier Greek art had not been very successful; and especially for a group representing a boy struggling with a goose, of which several copies survive in museums.
BOETHUS, was a sculptor from the Hellenistic period, originally from Carthage (or possibly Chalcedon). While his exact dates are unclear, he likely worked in the 2nd century BCE He was well-known for his depictions of children, an area where earlier Greek art had struggled. He is especially famous for a sculpture group showing a boy wrestling with a goose, of which several copies still exist in museums.
BOETIUS (or Boethius), ANICIUS MANLIUS SEVERINUS (c. A.D. 480-524), Roman philosopher and statesman, described by Gibbon as “the last of the Romans whom Cato or Tully could have acknowledged for their countryman.” The historians of the day give us but imperfect records or make unsatisfactory allusions. Later chroniclers indulged in the fictitious and the marvellous, and it is almost exclusively from his own books that trustworthy information can be obtained. There is considerable diversity among authorities as to his name. One editor of his De Consolatione, Bertius, thinks that he bore the praenomen of Flavius, but there is no authority for this supposition. His father was Flavius Manlius Boetius, and it is probable that the Flavius Boetius, the praetorian prefect who was put to death in A.D. 455 by order of Valentinian III., was his grandfather, but these facts do not prove that he also had the praenomen of Flavius. Many of the earlier editions inserted the name of Torquatus, but it is not found in any of the best manuscripts. The last name is commonly written Boethius, from the idea that it is connected with the Greek βοηθος; but the best manuscripts agree in reading Boetius.
BOETIUS (or Boethius), ANICIUS MANLIUS SEVERINUS (c. CE 480-524), was a Roman philosopher and statesman, described by Gibbon as “the last of the Romans whom Cato or Tully could have acknowledged as their countryman.” The historians of that time provide incomplete records or make unsatisfactory references. Later chroniclers often indulged in fiction and the marvelous, so it's mainly from his own writings that reliable information can be found. There is considerable disagreement among sources regarding his name. One editor of his De Consolatione, Bertius, suggests that he had the first name Flavius, but there's no evidence to support this claim. His father was Flavius Manlius Boetius, and it's likely that Flavius Boetius, the praetorian prefect executed in CE 455 by the order of Valentinian III, was his grandfather, yet these details don't confirm that he also had the first name Flavius. Many earlier editions included the name Torquatus, but it doesn’t appear in any of the best manuscripts. His last name is generally written as Boethius, based on the idea that it's linked to the Greek helper; however, the best manuscripts consistently read Boetius.
His boyhood was spent in Rome during the reign of Odoacer. We know nothing of his early years. A passage in a treatise falsely ascribed to him (De Disciplina Scholarium) and a misinterpretation of a passage in Cassiodorus led early scholars to suppose that he spent some eighteen years in Athens pursuing his studies, but there is no foundation for this opinion. His father, consul in 487, seems to have died soon after; for Boetius states that, when he was bereaved of his parent, men of the highest rank took him under their charge (De Con. lib. ii. c. 3), especially the senator Q. Aur. Memmius Symmachus, whose daughter Rusticiana he married. By her he had two sons, Anicius Manlius Severinus Boetius and Q. Aurelius Memmius Symmachus. He became a favourite with Theodoric, the Ostrogoth, who ruled in Rome from 500, and was one of his intimate friends. Boetius was consul in 510, and his sons, while still young, held the same honour together (522). Boetius regarded it as the height of his good fortune when he witnessed his two sons, consuls at the same time, convoyed from their home to the senate-house amid the enthusiasm of the masses. On that day, he tells us, while his sons occupied the curule chairs in the senate-house, he himself had the honour of pronouncing a panegyric on the monarch. But his good fortune did not last, and he attributes the calamities that came upon him to the ill-will which his bold maintenance of justice had caused, and to his opposition to every oppressive measure. Of this he mentions particular cases. A famine had begun to rage. The prefect of the praetorium was determined to satisfy the soldiers, regardless altogether of the feelings of the provincials. He accordingly issued an edict for a coemptio, that is, an order compelling the provincials to sell their corn to the government, whether they would or not. This edict would have utterly ruined Campania. Boetius interfered. The case was brought before the king, and Boetius succeeded in averting the coemptio from the Campanians. And he gives as a crowning instance that he exposed himself to the hatred of the informer Cyprianus by preventing the punishment of Albinus, a man of consular rank. He mentions in another place that when at Verona the king was anxious to transfer the accusation of treason brought against Albinus to the whole senate, he defended the senate at great risk. In consequence of the ill-will that Boetius had thus roused, he was accused of treason towards the end of the reign of Theodoric. The charges were that he had conspired against the king, that he was anxious to maintain the integrity of the senate, and to restore Rome to liberty, and that for this purpose he had written to the emperor Justin. Justin had, no doubt, special reasons for wishing to see an end to the reign of Theodoric. Justin was orthodox, Theodoric was an Arian. The orthodox subjects of Theodoric were suspicious of their ruler; and many would gladly have joined in a plot to displace him. The knowledge of this fact may have rendered Theodoric suspicious. But Boetius denied the accusation in unequivocal terms. He did indeed wish the integrity of the senate. He would fain have desired liberty, but all hope of it was gone. The letters addressed by him to Justin were forgeries, and he had not been guilty of any conspiracy. Notwithstanding his innocence he was condemned and sent to Ticinum (Pavia) where he was thrown into prison. It was during his confinement in this prison that he wrote his famous work De Consolatione Philosophiae. His goods were confiscated, and after an imprisonment of considerable duration he was put to death in 524. Procopius relates that Theodoric soon repented of his cruel deed, and that his death, which took place soon after, was hastened by remorse for the crime he had committed against his great counsellor.
His childhood was spent in Rome during Odoacer's rule. We know nothing about his early years. A passage in a treatise wrongly attributed to him (De Disciplina Scholarium) and a misreading of a passage in Cassiodorus led early scholars to think he spent about eighteen years in Athens studying, but there’s no basis for this belief. His father, consul in 487, seems to have died soon after; Boetius says that when he lost his parent, high-ranking individuals took him under their wing (De Con. lib. ii. c. 3), especially the senator Q. Aur. Memmius Symmachus, whose daughter Rusticiana he married. They had two sons, Anicius Manlius Severinus Boetius and Q. Aurelius Memmius Symmachus. He became a favorite of Theodoric, the Ostrogoth, who ruled in Rome from 500, and was one of his close friends. Boetius was consul in 510, and his sons, while still young, held the same honor together (522). Boetius considered it the peak of his good fortune when he witnessed his two sons, consuls at the same time, escorted from their home to the senate-house amidst the crowd's excitement. On that day, he tells us, while his sons occupied the curule chairs in the senate-house, he had the privilege of delivering a panegyric on the king. However, his good fortune was short-lived, and he attributed the misfortunes that befell him to the resentment that his bold stance for justice had stirred and to his opposition to every tyrannical measure. He cites specific instances. A famine had begun to spread. The prefect of the praetorium was determined to appease the soldiers, completely disregarding the feelings of the locals. He therefore issued an edict for a coemptio, compelling the provincials to sell their grain to the government, whether they wanted to or not. This order would have entirely devastated Campania. Boetius intervened. The case was brought before the king, and Boetius succeeded in stopping the coemptio from affecting the Campanians. He also points out that he risked the wrath of the informer Cyprianus by preventing the punishment of Albinus, a man of consular rank. He mentions elsewhere that when in Verona, the king wanted to shift the treason charge against Albinus onto the entire senate, he defended the senate at great personal risk. Because of the animosity that Boetius had stirred, he was accused of treason towards the end of Theodoric's reign. The accusations included conspiring against the king, wishing to uphold the senate's integrity, and wanting to restore freedom to Rome, claiming he had written to the emperor Justin for this purpose. Justin likely had special reasons for wanting Theodoric's reign to end. Justin was orthodox, while Theodoric was Arian. The orthodox subjects under Theodoric were suspicious of their ruler, and many would have gladly participated in a plot against him. This knowledge may have made Theodoric paranoid. However, Boetius firmly denied the accusations. He indeed wanted the senate to remain intact. He would have liked freedom, but all hope for it was lost. The letters sent to Justin were forgeries, and he was not involved in any conspiracy. Despite his innocence, he was condemned and sent to Ticinum (Pavia) where he was imprisoned. During his time in this prison, he wrote his famous work De Consolatione Philosophiae. His property was confiscated, and after being imprisoned for a significant period, he was executed in 524. Procopius reports that Theodoric soon regretted his cruel act, and that his death, which occurred shortly after, was hastened by his remorse for the crime he committed against his wise adviser.
Two or three centuries after the death of Boetius writers began to view his death as a martyrdom. Several Christian books were ascribed to him, and there was one especially on the Trinity (see below) which was regarded as proof that he had taken an active part against the heresy of Theodoric. It was therefore for his orthodoxy that Boetius was put to death. And these writers delight to paint with minuteness the horrible tortures to which he was exposed and the marvellous actions which the saint performed at his death. He was locally regarded as a saint, but he was not canonized. The brick tower in Pavia in which he was confined was, and still is, an object of reverence to the country people. Finally, in the year 996, Otho III. ordered the bones of Boetius to be taken out of the place in which they had lain hid, and to be placed in the church of S. Pietro in Ciel d’Oro within a splendid tomb, for which Gerbert, afterwards Pope Silvester II., wrote an inscription. Thence they were subsequently removed to a tomb beneath the high altar of the cathedral. It should be mentioned also that some have given him a decidedly Christian wife, of the name of Elpis, who wrote hymns, two of which are still extant (Daniel, Thes. Hymn. i. p. 156). This is a pure supposition inconsistent with chronology, and based only on a misinterpretation of a passage in the De Consolatione.
Two or three centuries after Boethius's death, writers started to see his death as martyrdom. Several Christian books were attributed to him, especially one on the Trinity (see below), which was seen as evidence that he actively opposed the heresy of Theodoric. Thus, Boethius was executed for his orthodoxy. These writers enjoy detailing the horrific tortures he underwent and the miraculous acts he performed at his death. He was locally viewed as a saint, although he wasn't canonized. The brick tower in Pavia where he was imprisoned is, and still is, a place of reverence for the local people. Finally, in 996, Otho III ordered Boethius's remains to be taken from where they had been hidden and placed in the church of S. Pietro in Ciel d’Oro in a magnificent tomb, for which Gerbert, later Pope Sylvester II, wrote an inscription. They were later moved to a tomb beneath the high altar of the cathedral. It's also worth noting that some have attributed a distinctly Christian wife named Elpis to him, who wrote hymns, two of which still exist (Daniel, Thes. Hymn. i. p. 156). This is purely speculative, inconsistent with the timeline, and based only on a misinterpretation of a passage in the De Consolatione.
The contemporaries of Boetius regarded him as a man of profound learning. Priscian the grammarian speaks of him as having attained the summit of honesty and of all sciences. Cassiodorus, magister officiorum under Theodoric and the intimate acquaintance of the philosopher, employs language equally strong, and Ennodius, the bishop of Pavia, knows no bounds for his admiration. Theodoric had a profound respect for his scientific abilities. He employed him in setting right the coinage. When he visited Rome with Gunibald, king of the Burgundians, he took him to Boetius, who showed them, amongst other mechanical contrivances, a sun-dial and a water-clock. The foreign monarch was astonished, and, at the request of Theodoric, Boetius had to prepare others of a similar nature, which were sent as presents to Gunibald.
The people in Boetius's time saw him as a highly educated man. Priscian the grammarian described him as having reached the highest level of integrity and knowledge in all fields. Cassiodorus, the magister officiorum under Theodoric and a close associate of the philosopher, used equally strong language, and Ennodius, the bishop of Pavia, expressed boundless admiration for him. Theodoric held great respect for his intellectual skills. He tasked him with correcting the coinage. When he visited Rome with Gunibald, the king of the Burgundians, he brought him to Boetius, who showed them various mechanical devices, including a sun-dial and a water-clock. The foreign king was amazed, and at Theodoric's request, Boetius had to create more similar devices, which were sent as gifts to Gunibald.
The fame of Boetius increased after his death, and his influence during the middle ages was exceedingly powerful. His circumstances peculiarly favoured this influence. He appeared at a time when contempt for intellectual pursuits had begun to pervade society. In his early years he was seized with a passionate enthusiasm for Greek literature, and this continued through life. Even amidst the cares of the consulship he found time for commenting on the Categories of Aristotle. The idea laid hold of him of reviving the spirit of his countrymen by imbuing them with the thoughts of the great Greek writers. He formed the resolution to translate all the works of Aristotle and all the dialogues of Plato, and to reconcile the philosophy of Plato with that of Aristotle. He did not succeed in all that he designed; but he did a great part of his work. He translated into Latin Aristotle’s Analytica Priora et Posteriora, the Topica, and Elenchi Sophistici; and he wrote commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories, on his book περὶ ἑρμηνείας, also a commentary on the Isagoge of Porphyrius. These works formed to a large extent the source from which the middle ages derived their knowledge of Aristotle. (See Stahr, Aristoteles bei den Römern, pp. 196-234.) Boetius wrote also a commentary on the Topica of Cicero; and he was also the author of independent works on logic:—Introductio ad Categoricos Syllogismos, in one book; De Syllogismis Categoricis, in two books; De Syllogismis Hypotheticis, in two books; De Divisione, in one book; De Definitione, in one book; De Differentiis Topicis, in four books.
The fame of Boethius grew after his death, and his impact during the Middle Ages was incredibly strong. His situation really helped with this influence. He lived at a time when society was starting to look down on intellectual pursuits. In his youth, he developed a deep passion for Greek literature that lasted his entire life. Even while dealing with the responsibilities of the consulship, he managed to find time to write commentaries on Aristotle's Categories. He became determined to revive the spirit of his fellow countrymen by sharing the ideas of great Greek writers. He made a plan to translate all of Aristotle's works and all of Plato’s dialogues, and to unify the philosophies of Plato and Aristotle. He didn’t achieve everything he set out to do, but he accomplished a significant part of his goals. He translated Aristotle's Analytica Priora et Posteriora, the Topica, and Elenchi Sophistici; he also wrote commentaries on Aristotle's Categories, on his book about interpretation, and a commentary on Porphyry’s Isagoge. These works largely became the foundation from which the Middle Ages learned about Aristotle. (See Stahr, Aristoteles bei den Römern, pp. 196-234.) Boethius also wrote a commentary on Cicero's Topica; he authored independent works on logic: Introductio ad Categoricos Syllogismos, in one book; De Syllogismis Categoricis, in two books; De Syllogismis Hypotheticis, in two books; De Divisione, in one book; De Definitione, in one book; and De Differentiis Topicis, in four books.
We see from a statement of Cassiodorus that he furnished manuals for the quadrivium of the schools of the middle ages (the “quattuor matheseos disciplinae,” as Boetius calls them) on arithmetic, music, geometry and astronomy. The statement of Cassiodorus that he translated Nicomachus is rhetorical. Boetius himself tells us in his preface addressed to his father-in-law Symmachus that he had taken liberties with the text of Nicomachus, that he had abridged the work when necessary, and that he had introduced formulae and diagrams of his own where he thought them useful for bringing out the meaning. His work on music also is not a translation from Pythagoras, who left no writing behind him. But Boetius belonged to the school of musical writers who based their science on the method of Pythagoras. They thought that it was not sufficient to trust to the ear alone, to determine the principles of music, as did practical musicians like Aristoxenus, but that along with the ear, physical experiments should be employed. The work of Boetius is in five books and is a very complete exposition of the subject. It long remained a text-book of music in the universities of Oxford and Cambridge. It is still very valuable as a help in ascertaining the principles of ancient music, and gives us the opinions of some of the best ancient writers on the art. The manuscripts of the geometry of Boetius differ widely from each other. One editor, Godofredus Friedlein, thinks that there are only two manuscripts which can at all lay claim to contain the work of Boetius. He published the Ars Geometriae, in two books, as given in these manuscripts; but critics are generally inclined to doubt the genuineness even of these. Professor Rand, Georgius Ernst and A.P. McKinlay regard the Ars as certainly inauthentic, while they accept the Interpretatio Euclidis (see works quoted in bibliography).
We learn from a statement by Cassiodorus that he provided manuals for the quadrivium of medieval schools (the “quattuor matheseos disciplinae,” as Boethius calls them) covering arithmetic, music, geometry, and astronomy. Cassiodorus's claim that he translated Nicomachus is more of a flourish. Boethius himself mentions in his preface to his father-in-law Symmachus that he took liberties with Nicomachus's text, abridging it where necessary and adding his own formulas and diagrams to clarify the meaning. His work on music is not a translation of Pythagoras, who left no writings. However, Boethius was part of the school of musical writers who based their ideas on Pythagorean methods. They believed it was not enough to rely solely on the ear to establish the principles of music, as practical musicians like Aristoxenus did; they insisted on combining auditory observation with physical experiments. Boethius's work is organized into five books and offers a thorough exploration of the topic. It remained a key textbook for music at the universities of Oxford and Cambridge for a long time. It is still quite valuable for understanding the principles of ancient music and shares insights from some of the best ancient authors on the subject. The manuscripts of Boethius's geometry vary significantly. One editor, Godofredus Friedlein, believes there are only two manuscripts that can legitimately claim to contain Boethius's work. He published the Ars Geometriae in two books based on these manuscripts; however, critics generally doubt the authenticity of even these. Professors Rand, Georgius Ernst, and A.P. McKinlay consider the Ars to be certainly inauthentic while accepting the Interpretatio Euclidis (see works quoted in bibliography).
By far the most important and most famous of the works of Boetius is his book De Consolatione Philosophiae. Gibbon justly describes it as “a golden volume, not unworthy of the leisure of Plato or Tully, but which claims incomparable merit from the barbarism of the times and the situation of the author.” The high reputation it had in medieval times is attested by the numerous translations, commentaries and imitations of it which then appeared. Among others Asser, the instructor of Alfred the Great, and Robert Grosseteste, bishop of Lincoln, commented on it. Alfred translated it into Anglo-Saxon. Versions of it appeared in German, French, Italian, Spanish and Greek before the end of the 15th century. Chaucer translated it into English prose before the year 1382; and this translation was published by Caxton at Westminster, 1480. Lydgate followed in the wake of Chaucer. It is said that, after the invention of printing, amongst others Queen Elizabeth translated it, and that the work was well known to Shakespeare. It was the basis of the earliest specimen of Provençal literature.
The most important and famous work by Boetius is his book De Consolatione Philosophiae. Gibbon aptly calls it “a golden volume, worthy of the attention of Plato or Tully, which deserves exceptional recognition because of the barbarism of the times and the circumstances of the author.” Its high reputation in medieval times is evidenced by the many translations, commentaries, and imitations that emerged. Notably, Asser, who taught Alfred the Great, and Robert Grosseteste, the bishop of Lincoln, wrote commentaries on it. Alfred translated it into Anglo-Saxon. Versions appeared in German, French, Italian, Spanish, and Greek before the end of the 15th century. Chaucer translated it into English prose before 1382, and this translation was published by Caxton in Westminster in 1480. Lydgate followed Chaucer's lead. It's said that after the invention of printing, Queen Elizabeth also translated it, and the work was well known to Shakespeare. It was fundamental to the earliest examples of Provençal literature.
This famous work consists of five books. Its form is peculiar, and is an imitation of a similar work by Marcianus Capella, De Nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii. It is alternately in prose and verse. The verse shows great facility of metrical composition, but a considerable portion of it is transferred from the tragedies of Seneca. The first book opens with a few verses, in which Boetius describes how his sorrows had brought him to a premature old age. As he is thus lamenting, a woman appears to him of dignified mien, whom he recognizes as his guardian, Philosophy. She, resolving to apply the remedy for his grief, questions him for that purpose. She finds that he believes that God rules the world, but does not know what he himself is; and this absence of self-knowledge is the cause of his weakness. In the second book Philosophy presents to Boetius Fortune, who is made to state to him the blessings he has enjoyed, and after that proceeds to discuss with him the kind of blessings that fortune can bestow, which are shown to be unsatisfactory and uncertain. In the third book Philosophy promises to lead him to true happiness, which is to be found in God alone, for since God is the highest good, and the highest good is true happiness, God is true happiness. Nor can real evil exist, for since God is all-powerful, and since he does not wish evil, evil must be non-existent. In the fourth book Boetius raises the question, Why, if the governor of the universe is good, do evils exist, and why is virtue often punished and vice rewarded? Philosophy proceeds to show that in fact vice is never unpunished nor virtue unrewarded. From this Philosophy passes into a discussion in regard to the nature of providence and fate, and shows that every fortune is good. The fifth and last book takes up the question of man’s free will and God’s foreknowledge, and, by an exposition of the nature of God, attempts to show that these doctrines are not subversive of each other; and the conclusion is drawn that God remains a foreknowing spectator of all events, and the ever-present eternity of his vision agrees with the future quality of our actions, dispensing rewards to the good and punishments to the wicked.
This well-known work is made up of five books. Its structure is unique and mimics a similar piece by Marcianus Capella, De Nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii. It alternates between prose and verse. The verses demonstrate a great skill in meter, but a significant part is borrowed from the tragedies of Seneca. The first book starts with a few lines where Boethius describes how his sorrows have aged him prematurely. While he is lamenting, a dignified woman appears to him, whom he recognizes as his guide, Philosophy. She decides to help him with his grief and asks him questions to understand his situation. She finds that he believes God governs the world but does not truly understand himself, and this lack of self-awareness is the root of his weakness. In the second book, Philosophy introduces Boethius to Fortune, who recounts the blessings he has had. They then discuss the types of benefits Fortune can provide, which are shown to be unreliable and fleeting. In the third book, Philosophy promises to guide him to true happiness, which can only be found in God, the highest good, and since true happiness is God, it is the ultimate fulfillment. There can be no real evil, because since God is all-powerful and does not wish for evil, it must be non-existent. In the fourth book, Boethius questions why evils exist if the ruler of the universe is good, and why virtue is often punished while vice is rewarded. Philosophy explains that vice is never without punishment and virtue is never without reward. From there, she transitions into a discussion about the nature of providence and fate, demonstrating that every fortune is ultimately for the good. The fifth and final book addresses the questions of human free will and God’s foreknowledge, and through an exploration of God's nature, it argues that these beliefs do not contradict each other. It concludes that God remains an all-knowing observer of all events, and the eternal nature of His vision aligns with the future quality of our actions, dispensing rewards to the good and punishments to the wicked.
Several theological works have been ascribed to Boetius, as has been already mentioned. The Consolatio affords conclusive proof that the author was not a practical believer in Christianity. The book contains expressions such as daemones, angelica virtus, and purgatoria dementia, which have been thought to be derived from the Christian faith; but they are used in a heathen sense, and are explained sufficiently by the circumstance that Boetius was on intimate terms with Christians. The writer nowhere finds consolation in any Christian belief, and Christ is never named in the work. It is not impossible, however, that Boetius may have been brought up a Christian, and that in his early years he may have written some Christian books. Peiper thinks that the first three treatises are the productions of the early years of Boetius. The first, De Sancta Trinitate, is addressed to Symmachus (Domino Patri Symmacho), and the result of the short discussion, which is of an abstract nature, and deals partly with the ten categories, is that unity is predicated absolutely, or, in regard to the substance of the Deity, trinity is predicated relatively. The second treatise is addressed to John the deacon (“Ad Joannem Diaconum”), and its subject is “Utrum Pater et Filius et Spiritus Sanctus de divinitate substantialiter praedicentur.” This treatise is shorter than the first, occupying only two or three pages, and the conclusion of the argument is the same. The third treatise bears the title, Quomodo substantiae in eo quod sint bonae sint cum non sint substantialia bona. It contains nothing distinctly Christian, and it contains nothing of great value; therefore its authorship is a matter of little consequence. Peiper thinks that, as the best MSS. uniformly assign these treatises to Boetius, they are to be regarded as his; that it is probable that Symmachus and John (who afterwards became Pope) were the men of highest distinction who took charge of him when he lost his father; and that these treatises are the first-fruits of his studies, which he dedicates to his guardians and benefactors. He thinks that the variations in the inscriptions of the fifth treatise which is not found in the best manuscript, are so great that the name of Boetius could 118 not have originally been in the title. The fourth book is also not found in the best manuscript, and two manuscripts have no inscription. He infers, from these facts, that there is no sure evidence for the authorship of the fourth and fifth treatises. The fifth treatise is Contra Eutychen et Nestorium. Both Eutyches and Nestorius are spoken of as living. A council is mentioned, in which a letter was read, expounding the opinion of the Eutychians for the first time. The novelty of the opinion is also alluded to. All these circumstances point to the council of Chalcedon (451). The treatise was therefore written before the birth of Boetius, if it be not a forgery; but there is no reason to suppose that the treatise was not a genuine production of the time to which it professes to belong. The fourth treatise, De Fide Catholica, does not contain any distinct chronological data; but the tone and opinions of the treatise produce the impression that it probably belonged to the same period as the treatise against Eutyches and Nestorius. Several inscriptions ascribe both these treatises to Boetius. It will be seen from this statement that Peiper bases his conclusions on grounds far too narrow; and on the whole it is perhaps more probable that Boetius wrote none of the four Christian treatises, particularly as they are not ascribed to him by any of his contemporaries. Three of them express in the strongest language the orthodox faith of the church in opposition to the Arian heresy, and these three put in unmistakable language the procession of the Holy Spirit from both Father and Son. The fourth argues for the orthodox belief of the two natures and one person of Christ. When the desire arose that it should be believed that Boetius perished from his opposition to the heresy of Theodoric, it was natural to ascribe to him works which were in harmony with this supposed fact. The works may really have been written by one Boetius, a bishop of Africa, as Jourdain supposes, or by some Saint Severinus, as Nitzsch conjectures, and the similarity of name may have aided the transference of them to the heathen or neutral Boetius.
Several theological works have been attributed to Boetius, as mentioned earlier. The Consolatio provides clear evidence that the author was not genuinely committed to Christianity. The book includes terms like daemones, angelica virtus, and purgatoria dementia, which some believe come from Christian teachings; however, they are used in a pagan context and can be explained by Boetius’s close relationships with Christians. The writer does not find solace in any Christian belief, and Christ is never mentioned in the work. It is possible that Boetius was raised as a Christian and may have written some Christian texts in his youth. Peiper suggests that the first three treatises were written during Boetius’s early years. The first, De Sancta Trinitate, is addressed to Symmachus (Domino Patri Symmacho), and the brief discussion, which is quite abstract and touches on the ten categories, concludes that unity is stated absolutely, while regarding the substance of the Deity, trinity is stated relatively. The second treatise is addressed to John the deacon (“Ad Joannem Diaconum”), and its topic is “Whether the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are substantially predicated in divinity.” This treatise is shorter than the first, spanning only two or three pages, but its conclusion is the same. The third treatise is titled Quomodo substantiae in eo quod sint bonae sint cum non sint substantialia bona. It does not contain anything distinctly Christian or of significant value, so its authorship is of little importance. Peiper believes that since the best manuscripts consistently attribute these treatises to Boetius, they should be regarded as his; he speculates that Symmachus and John (who later became Pope) were the prominent figures who guided him after losing his father, and these treatises are the early results of his studies, which he dedicates to his guardians and benefactors. He notes that the variations in the titles of the fifth treatise, which is not found in the best manuscript, are significant enough to suggest that Boetius’s name might not have originally been included in the title. The fourth book is also missing from the best manuscript, and two manuscripts have no title. From these facts, he concludes that there is no reliable evidence for the authorship of the fourth and fifth treatises. The fifth treatise is Contra Eutychen et Nestorium. Both Eutyches and Nestorius are mentioned as living. A council is referenced, where a letter was read, presenting the view of the Eutychians for the first time. The newness of the opinion is also noted. All these details point to the council of Chalcedon (451). Therefore, the treatise must have been written before Boetius was born unless it is a forgery; however, there’s no reason to doubt that it genuinely belongs to the time it claims to be from. The fourth treatise, De Fide Catholica, offers no clear chronological details, but its tone and views suggest it likely comes from the same period as the treatise against Eutyches and Nestorius. Various inscriptions attribute both these treatises to Boetius. This indicates that Peiper’s conclusions are based on a scope that is too limited; overall, it seems more probable that Boetius did not write any of the four Christian treatises, especially since none are attributed to him by his contemporaries. Three of them strongly express the orthodox faith of the church against the Arian heresy, clearly stating the procession of the Holy Spirit from both the Father and the Son. The fourth defends the orthodox belief in the two natures and one person of Christ. When the idea emerged that Boetius suffered due to his opposition to Theodoric's heresy, it was natural to attribute to him works that aligned with this assumed truth. The works may have actually been written by another Boetius, a bishop in Africa, as Jourdain suggests, or by some Saint Severinus, as Nitzsch speculates, and the similarity in names could have helped transfer these works to the pagan or neutral Boetius.
Important and, if genuine, decisive evidence upon this point is afforded by a passage in the Anecdoton Holderi, a fragment contained in a 10th-century MS. (ed. H. Usener, Leipzig, 1877). The fragment gives an extract from a previously unknown letter of Cassiodorus, the important words being “Scripsit (i.e. Boetius) librum de sancta trinitate, et capita quaedam dogmatica, et librum contra Nestorium.” Nitzsch, however, held that this was a copyist’s gloss, harmonizing with the received Boetius legend, which had been transferred to the text, and did not consider that it outweighed the opposing internal evidence from De Cons. Phil.
Important and, if true, crucial evidence on this matter is provided by a passage in the Anecdoton Holderi, a fragment found in a 10th-century manuscript (ed. H. Usener, Leipzig, 1877). The fragment includes an excerpt from a previously unknown letter by Cassiodorus, with the key words being “Scripsit (i.e. Boetius) librum de sancta trinitate, et capita quaedam dogmatica, et librum contra Nestorium.” Nitzsch, however, argued that this was merely a copyist’s note, aligning with the established Boetius story, which had been incorporated into the text, and he did not believe it outweighed the conflicting internal evidence from De Cons. Phil.
Editions.—The first collected edition of the works of Boetius was published at Venice in 1492 (Basel, 1570); the last in J.P. Migne’s Patrologia, lxiii., lxiv. (Paris, 1847). Of the numerous editions of the De Consolatione the best are those of Theodorus Obbarius (Jena, 1843) and R. Peiper (Leipzig, 1871). The first contains prolegomena on the life and writings of Boetius, on his religion and philosophy, and on the manuscripts and editions, a critical apparatus, and notes. The text of the second was based on the fullest collation of MSS. up to that time, though a considerable number of MSS. still remained to be collated. In addition to an account of the MSS. used, it gives the Book of Lupus, “De Metris Boetii,” the “Vita Boetii” contained in some MSS., “Elogia Boetii,” and a short list of the commentators, translators and imitators of the Consolatio. It contains also an account of the metres used by Boetius in the Consolatio, and a list of the passages which he has borrowed from the tragedies of Seneca. The work also includes the five treatises, four of them Christian, of which mention has been made above. King Alfred’s Anglo-Saxon version of the De Consolatione, with literal English translation, notes and glossary, was published by S. Fox (1835) and again by W.J. Sedgefield (1900); that of G. Colville (Colvile, Coldewel, 1556) was republished by E.B. Bax (1897); translation (mixed prose and verse) by H.R. James (1897). Queen Elizabeth’s “Englishings” was reprinted in 1899; on the style, see A. Engelbrecht in Sitzungsber. der Wiener Akad. der Wissenschaften (1902), pp. 15-36. The De Institutione Arithmetica, De Institutione Musica, and the doubtful Geometria (for which see G. Ernst, De Geometricis illis quae sub Boethii nomine nobis tradita sunt quaestiones, 1903; A.P. McKinlay in Harvard Classical Studies, 1907; M. Cantor, Geschichte der Mathematik, i., Leipzig, 1894; G. Friedlein, Gerbert, die Geometric des Boethius, und die indischen Ziffern, Erlangen, 1861, are edited by G. Friedlein (Leipzig, 1867); German translation of the De Musica, with explanatory notes, by O. Paul (Leipzig, 1872), and on the sources W. Miekley, De Boethii libri de musica primi fontibus (Jena, 1899). Commentary on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione περι ἑρμηνείας), ed. C. Meiser (Leipzig, 1877), and on Porphyry’s Isagoge, ed. S. Brandt (Vienna, 1906).
Editions.—The first collected edition of Boetius's works was published in Venice in 1492 (Basel, 1570); the most recent edition appeared in J.P. Migne’s Patrologia, lxiii., lxiv. (Paris, 1847). Among the many editions of the De Consolatione, the best are those by Theodorus Obbarius (Jena, 1843) and R. Peiper (Leipzig, 1871). The first edition includes introductions on Boetius's life and writings, his religion and philosophy, and the manuscripts and editions, along with a critical apparatus and notes. The text of the second edition was based on the most comprehensive collation of manuscripts available at that time, although many manuscripts were still to be collated. In addition to detailing the manuscripts used, it includes the Book of Lupus, “De Metris Boetii,” the “Vita Boetii” found in some manuscripts, “Elogia Boetii,” and a brief list of the commentators, translators, and imitators of the Consolatio. It also contains information about the meters Boetius used in the Consolatio, along with a list of passages he borrowed from Seneca's tragedies. The work features the five treatises, four of which are Christian, mentioned earlier. King Alfred’s Anglo-Saxon version of the De Consolatione, with a literal English translation, notes, and glossary, was published by S. Fox (1835) and again by W.J. Sedgefield (1900); G. Colville's version (Colvile, Coldewel, 1556) was republished by E.B. Bax (1897), and H.R. James provided a translation (mixed prose and verse) in 1897. Queen Elizabeth’s “Englishings” was reprinted in 1899; for more on the style, see A. Engelbrecht in Sitzungsber. der Wiener Akad. der Wissenschaften (1902), pp. 15-36. The De Institutione Arithmetica, De Institutione Musica, and the questionable Geometria (for details, see G. Ernst, De Geometricis illis quae sub Boethii nomine nobis tradita sunt quaestiones, 1903; A.P. McKinlay in Harvard Classical Studies, 1907; M. Cantor, Geschichte der Mathematik, i., Leipzig, 1894; G. Friedlein, Gerbert, die Geometric des Boethius, und die indischen Ziffern, Erlangen, 1861, edited by G. Friedlein (Leipzig, 1867); a German translation of the De Musica, with explanatory notes, was done by O. Paul (Leipzig, 1872), and for sources, see W. Miekley, De Boethii libri de musica primi fontibus (Jena, 1899). Commentary on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione about interpretation), edited by C. Meiser (Leipzig, 1877), and on Porphyry’s Isagoge, edited by S. Brandt (Vienna, 1906).
Authorities.—On Boetius generally, see J.G. Sutterer, Der letzte Romer (Eichstadt, 1852); H. Usener, Anecdoton Holderi (Leipzig, 1877); H.F. Stewart, Boethius: an Essay (Edinburgh, 1891); T. Hodgkin, Italy and her Invaders, iii. bk. iv. ch. xii. (1896); A. Ebert, Allgemeine Geschichte der Litt. des Mittelalters, i. (1889); Teuffel-Schwabe, Hist. of Roman Literature (Eng. trans., 1900), §478: on the date and order of his works, S. Brandt in Philologus, lxii. pp. 141-154, 234-279, and A.P. McKinlay, as above, with refs.: on his “Songs,” H. Hüttinger, Studia in Boetii carmina collata (Regensburg, 1900): on his style, G. Bednarz, De universo orationis colore Boethii (Breslau, 1883): on his theological attitude and works, F.A.B. Nitzsch, Das System des Boethius und die ihm zugeschriebenen theologischen Schriften (Berlin, 1860), and art. in Herzog-Hauck’s Realencyklopädie (1897); C. Jourdain, De l’Origine des traditions sur le christianisme de Boèce (1861); Gaston Boissier, “Le Christianisme de Boèce,” in Journal des Savants (1889), pp. 449-462; A. Hildebrand, Boethius und seine Stellung zum Christentume (Regensburg, 1885); G. Schepps, “Zu Pseudo-Boethius de fide catholica,” in Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Theologie, xxxviii. (1895).
Authorities.—For a general overview of Boethius, see J.G. Sutterer, The Last Roman (Eichstadt, 1852); H. Usener, Anecdotes of Holder (Leipzig, 1877); H.F. Stewart, Boethius: An Essay (Edinburgh, 1891); T. Hodgkin, Italy and Her Invaders, vol. 3, bk. 4, ch. 12 (1896); A. Ebert, General History of Literature in the Middle Ages, vol. 1 (1889); Teuffel-Schwabe, History of Roman Literature (English translation, 1900), §478: for the date and sequence of his works, see S. Brandt in Philologus, vol. 62, pp. 141-154, 234-279, and A.P. McKinlay, as mentioned above, with references: regarding his “Songs,” see H. Hüttinger, Studies on Boethius’s Poems (Regensburg, 1900): on his writing style, G. Bednarz, The Overall Color of Boethius’s Speech (Breslau, 1883): concerning his theological views and writings, F.A.B. Nitzsch, The System of Boethius and the Theological Works Attributed to Him (Berlin, 1860), and an article in Herzog-Hauck’s Real Encyclopedia (1897); C. Jourdain, On the Origin of the Traditions Regarding the Christianity of Boethius (1861); Gaston Boissier, “The Christianity of Boethius,” in Journal des Savants (1889), pp. 449-462; A. Hildebrand, Boethius and His Position Regarding Christianity (Regensburg, 1885); G. Schepps, “On Pseudo-Boethius and the Catholic Faith,” in Journal for Scientific Theology, vol. 38 (1895).
BOG (from Ir. and Gael, bogach, bog, soft), a tract of soft, spongy, water-logged ground, composed of vegetation, chiefly mosses, in various stages of decomposition. This vegetable matter when partially decomposed forms the substance known as “peat” (q.v.). When the accumulation of water is rapidly increased by excessive rainfall, there is a danger of a “bog-slide,” or “bog-burst,” which may obliterate the neighbouring cultivated land with a deposit of the contents of the bog. Destructive bog-slides have occurred in Ireland, such as that of the Knocknageeha Bog, Rathmore, Kerry, in 1896, at Castlerea, Roscommon, 1901, and at Kilmore, Galway, 1909.
BOG (from Ir. and Gael, bogach, bog, soft), a piece of soft, spongy, waterlogged land made up of vegetation, mainly mosses, in different stages of decay. This plant matter, when partially decomposed, forms the substance known as “peat” (q.v.). When water builds up quickly due to heavy rainfall, there’s a risk of a “bog-slide” or “bog-burst,” which can cover nearby farmland with the contents of the bog. Destructive bog slides have happened in Ireland, such as the one in Knocknageeha Bog, Rathmore, Kerry, in 1896, in Castlerea, Roscommon, in 1901, and in Kilmore, Galway, in 1909.
There is a French game of cards called “bog,” said to be of Italian origin, played with a piquet pack on a table with six divisions, one of which is known by the name of the game and forms the pool. It was fashionable during the Second Empire.
There’s a French card game called “bog,” which is believed to have Italian roots. It’s played with a piquet deck on a table divided into six sections, one of which is named after the game and serves as the pool. It was popular during the Second Empire.
BOGATZKY, KARL HEINRICH VON (1690-1774), German hymn-writer, was born at Jankowe in Lower Silesia on the 7th of September 1690. At first a page at the ducal court of Saxe-Weissenfels, he next studied law and theology at Jena and Halle; but ill-health preventing his preferment he settled at Glancha in Silesia, where he founded an orphanage. After living for a time at Köstritz, and from 1740 to 1745 at the court of Christian Ernst, duke of Saxe-Coburg, at Saalfeld, he made his home at the Waisenhaus (orphanage) at Halle, where he engaged in spiritual work and in composing hymns and sacred songs, until his death on the 15th of June 1774. Bogatzky’s chief works are Güldenes Schatzkästlein der Kinder Gottes (1718), which has reached more than sixty editions; and Übung der Gottseligkeit in allerlei geistlichen Liedern (1750).
BOGATZKY, KARL HEINRICH VON (1690-1774), German hymn writer, was born in Jankowe, Lower Silesia, on September 7, 1690. He initially served as a page at the ducal court of Saxe-Weissenfels, then went on to study law and theology at Jena and Halle. However, due to health issues that hindered his career advancement, he settled in Glancha, Silesia, where he established an orphanage. After spending some time in Köstritz and from 1740 to 1745 at the court of Christian Ernst, duke of Saxe-Coburg, in Saalfeld, he made his home at the Waisenhaus (orphanage) in Halle. There, he focused on spiritual work and the composition of hymns and sacred songs until his death on June 15, 1774. Bogatzky’s main works include Güldenes Schatzkästlein der Kinder Gottes (1718), which has seen over sixty editions, and Übung der Gottseligkeit in allerlei geistlichen Liedern (1750).
See Bogatzky’s autobiography—Lebenslauf von ihm selbst geschrieben (Halle, 1801; new ed., Berlin, 1872); and Ledderhose, Das Leben Bogatzky’s (Heidelberg, 1846); also Kelly, C.H. von Bogatzky’s Life and Work (London, 1889).
See Bogatzky’s autobiography—Lebenslauf von ihm selbst geschrieben (Halle, 1801; new ed., Berlin, 1872); and Ledderhose, Das Leben Bogatzky’s (Heidelberg, 1846); also Kelly, C.H. von Bogatzky’s Life and Work (London, 1889).
BOGHAZ KEUI, a small village in Asia Minor, north-west of Yuzgat in the Angora vilayet, remarkable for the ruins and rock-sculptures in its vicinity. The ruins are those of a ruling city of the oriental type which flourished in the pre-Greek period; and they are generally identified with Pteria (q.v.), a place taken by Croesus after he had crossed the Halys (Herodotus i. 76).
BOGHAZ KEUI, is a small village in Asia Minor, northwest of Yuzgat in the Angora region, known for the ruins and rock sculptures around it. The ruins belong to an ancient oriental city that thrived before the Greek period, and they are usually recognized as Pteria (q.v.), a site captured by Croesus after he crossed the Halys River (Herodotus i. 76).
BOGIE, a northern English dialect word of unknown origin, applied to a kind of low truck or “trolly.” In railway engineering it is applied to an under-truck, most frequently with four wheels, which is often provided at one end of a locomotive or both ends of a carriage. It is pivoted or swivelled on the main frames, so that it can turn relatively to the body of the vehicle or engine, and thus it enables the wheels readily to follow the curves of the line. It has no connexion with the series of words, such as “bogey” or “bogy,” “bogle,” “boggle,” “bogart” (in Shakespeare “bug,” “bugs and goblins”), which are probably connected with the Welsh bwg, a spectre; hence the verb to “boggle,” properly applied to a horse which shies at supposed spectres, and so meaning to hesitate, bungle.
BOGIE is a word from a northern English dialect with an uncertain origin, used to describe a type of low truck or "trolley." In railway engineering, it refers to an undercarriage, usually with four wheels, often found at one end of a locomotive or at both ends of a carriage. It's pivoted or swiveled on the main frames, allowing it to turn relative to the vehicle or engine's body, which helps the wheels easily follow the curves of the track. It’s not connected to the series of words like "bogey" or "bogy," "bogle," "boggle," "bogart" (which Shakespeare referred to as "bug," "bugs and goblins"), though they might be linked to the Welsh bwg, meaning a ghost; hence, the verb to "boggle" is commonly used for a horse that shies away from imagined spirits, which means to hesitate or mess up.
BOGNOR, a seaside resort in the Chichester parliamentary division of Sussex, England, 66 m. S.S.W. from London by the London, Brighton & South Coast railway. Pop. of urban district (1901) 6180. Besides the parish church there is a Roman Catholic priory and church. The town possesses a pier and promenade, a theatre, assembly rooms, and numerous convalescent homes, including an establishment belonging to the Merchant Taylors’ Company. The church of the mother parish of South Bersted is Norman and Early English, and retains a fresco of the 16th century.
BOGNOR, is a seaside resort located in the Chichester parliamentary division of Sussex, England, 66 miles southwest of London by the London, Brighton & South Coast railway. The population of the urban district was 6,180 in 1901. In addition to the parish church, there is a Roman Catholic priory and church. The town features a pier and promenade, a theatre, assembly rooms, and several convalescent homes, including one owned by the Merchant Taylors’ Company. The church of the main parish of South Bersted is Norman and Early English in style and still has a 16th-century fresco.
BOGÓ, a town of the province of Cebú, island of Cebú, Philippine Islands, on Bogó Bay at the mouth of the Bulac river, in the north-east part of the island. Pop. (1903) 14,915. The 119 climate is hot but healthy. The surrounding country is fertile, producing sugar, Indian corn, and maguay in abundance; rice, cacao and fruits are also produced. Hats, baskets, cloths and rope are woven and are exported to a limited extent; small quantities of copra are also exported. The fisheries are of considerable local importance. The language is Cebú-Visayan.
BOGÓ, is a town in the province of Cebú on the island of Cebú, Philippines, located on Bogó Bay at the mouth of the Bulac River in the northeast part of the island. Population (1903) was 14,915. The 119 climate is hot but healthy. The surrounding area is fertile, producing plenty of sugar, corn, and maguay, as well as rice, cacao, and various fruits. Hats, baskets, cloth, and rope are made and exported on a small scale; small amounts of copra are also shipped out. The local fisheries are quite important. The language spoken here is Cebú-Visayan.
BOGODUKHOV, a town of Russia, in the government of Kharkov, 45 m. by rail N.W. of the city of that name, in 49° 58′ N. lat. and 36° 9′ E. long., was formerly fortified. Pop. (1860) 10,522; (1897) 11,928. There seems to have been a settlement on this site as early as 1571. In 1709, at the time of the Russo-Swedish War, Bogodukhov was taken by Menshikov and the emperor Alexius. It contains a cathedral, built in 1793. Boots, caps and furred gowns are manufactured, and gardening and tanning are carried on. The trade is principally in grain, cattle and fish.
BOGODUKHOV, is a town in Russia, located in the Kharkov region, 45 miles by rail northwest of the city of Kharkov, at 49° 58′ N latitude and 36° 9′ E longitude. It was once fortified. The population was 10,522 in 1860 and 11,928 in 1897. There seems to have been a settlement here as early as 1571. In 1709, during the Russo-Swedish War, Bogodukhov was seized by Menshikov and Emperor Alexius. The town features a cathedral built in 1793. It manufactures boots, caps, and fur coats, and has activities related to gardening and tanning. The main trade includes grain, cattle, and fish.
BOGOMILS, the name of an ancient religious community which had its origin in Bulgaria. It is difficult to ascertain whether the name was taken from the reputed founder of that sect, a certain pope Bogumil or Bogomil, or whether he assumed that name after it had been given to the whole sect. The word is a direct translation into Slavonic of Massaliani, the Syrian name of the sect corresponding to the Greek Euchites. The Bogomils are identified with the Massaliani in Slavonic documents of the 13th century. They are also known as Pavlikeni, i.e. Paulicians. It is a complicated task to determine the true character and the tenets of any ancient sect, considering that almost all the information that has reached us has come from the opponents. The heretical literature has to a great extent either perished or been completely changed; but much has also survived in a modified written form or through oral tradition. Concerning the Bogomils something can be gathered from the information collected by Euthymius Zygadenus in the 12th century, and from the polemic Against the Heretics written in Slavonic by St Kozma during the 10th century. The old Slavonic lists of forbidden books of the 15th and 16th centuries also give us a clue to the discovery of this heretical literature and of the means the Bogomils employed to carry on their propaganda. Much may also be learnt from the doctrines of the numerous heretical sects which arose in Russia after the 11th century.
BOGOMILS, is the name of an ancient religious community that started in Bulgaria. It's hard to determine if the name came from the supposed founder of that sect, a figure known as pope Bogumil or Bogomil, or if he took that name after it was already assigned to the entire group. The term is a direct translation into Slavic of Massaliani, the Syrian name for the sect that corresponds to the Greek Euchites. The Bogomils are linked to the Massaliani in Slavic documents from the 13th century. They are also referred to as Pavlikeni, meaning Paulicians. Figuring out the true nature and beliefs of any ancient sect is complicated, especially since most of the information we have comes from their critics. Much of the heretical literature has either been lost or completely altered; however, a good amount has survived in modified written form or through oral tradition. Regarding the Bogomils, some insight can be gained from the information compiled by Euthymius Zygadenus in the 12th century, and from the polemic Against the Heretics written in Slavic by St Kozma in the 10th century. The old Slavic lists of banned books from the 15th and 16th centuries also provide clues about this heretical literature and the ways the Bogomils spread their beliefs. Additionally, there is much to learn from the doctrines of numerous heretical sects that emerged in Russia after the 11th century.
The Bogomils were without doubt the connecting link between the so-called heretical sects of the East and those of the West. They were, moreover, the most active agents in disseminating such teachings in Russia and among all the nations of Europe. They may have found in some places a soil already prepared by more ancient tenets which had been preserved in spite of the persecution of the official Church, and handed down from the period of primitive Christianity. In the 12th and 13th centuries the Bogomils were already known in the West as “Bulgari.” In 1207 the Bulgarornm heresis is mentioned. In 1223 the Albigenses are declared to be the local Bougres, and at the same period mention is made of the “Pope of the Albigenses who resided within the confines of Bulgaria.” The Cathars and Patarenes, the Waldenses, the Anabaptists, and in Russia the Strigolniki, Molokani and Dukhobortsi, have all at different times been either identified with the Bogomils or closely connected with them.
The Bogomils were definitely the link between the so-called heretical sects of the East and those in the West. They were also the most active in spreading these teachings in Russia and throughout Europe. In some areas, they may have found a foundation already laid by older beliefs that had endured despite the official Church's persecution, passed down since the early days of Christianity. By the 12th and 13th centuries, the Bogomils were known in the West as “Bulgari.” In 1207, the Bulgarornm heresis is mentioned. In 1223, the Albigenses were referred to as the local Bougres, and at that same time, there are references to the “Pope of the Albigenses who lived in Bulgaria.” The Cathars and Patarenes, the Waldenses, the Anabaptists, and in Russia, the Strigolniki, Molokani, and Dukhobortsi, have all at different times been identified with the Bogomils or closely linked to them.
Doctrine.—From the imperfect and conflicting data which are alone available one positive result can be gathered, viz. that the Bogomils were both Adoptionists and Manichaeans. They had accepted the teaching of Paul of Samosata, though at a later period the name of Paul was believed to be that of the Apostle; and they were not quite free from the Dualistic principle of the Gnostics, at a later period too much identified with the teaching of Mani. They rejected the pneumatic Christianity of the orthodox churches and did not accept the docetic teaching of some of the other sects. Taking as our starting-point the teaching of the heretical sects in Russia, notably those of the 14th century, which are a direct continuation of the doctrines held by the Bogomils, we find that they denied the divine birth of Christ, the personal coexistence of the Son with the Father and Holy Ghost, and the validity of sacraments and ceremonies. The miracles performed by Jesus were interpreted in a spiritual sense, not as real material occurrences; the Church was the interior spiritual church in which all held equal share. Baptism was only to be practised on grown men and women. The Bogomils repudiated infant baptism, and considered the baptismal rite to be of a spiritual character neither by water nor by oil but by self-abnegation, prayers and chanting of hymns. Carp Strigolnik, who in the 14th century preached this doctrine in Novgorod, explained that St Paul had taught that simple-minded men should instruct one another; therefore they elected their “teachers” from among themselves to be their spiritual guides, and had no special priests. Prayers were to be said in private houses, not in separate buildings such as churches. Ordination was conferred by the congregation and not by any specially appointed minister. The congregation were the “elect,” and each member could obtain the perfection of Christ and become a Christ or “Chlist.” Marriage was not a sacrament. The Bogomils refused to fast on Mondays and Fridays. They rejected monachism. They declared Christ to be the Son of God only through grace like other prophets, and that the bread and wine of the eucharist were not transformed into flesh and blood; that the last judgment would be executed by God and not by Jesus; that the images and the cross were idols and the worship of saints and relics idolatry.
Doctrine.—From the limited and conflicting information that is available, one clear conclusion can be drawn: the Bogomils were both Adoptionists and Manichaeans. They accepted the teachings of Paul of Samosata, although later on they mistakenly believed that Paul referred to the Apostle; and they were not entirely free from the Dualistic ideas of the Gnostics, which became too closely linked with the teachings of Mani. They rejected the spiritual Christianity of the mainstream churches and did not accept the docetic views held by some other sects. Starting from the teachings of heretical sects in Russia, especially those from the 14th century, which are a direct continuation of the beliefs of the Bogomils, we see that they denied the divine birth of Christ, the personal coexistence of the Son with the Father and the Holy Ghost, and the legitimacy of sacraments and ceremonies. They viewed the miracles performed by Jesus as symbolic, not as actual physical events; the Church was seen as the inner spiritual community where everyone shared equally. Baptism was only to be performed on adults. The Bogomils rejected infant baptism, viewing the ritual as spiritual—not achieved through water or oil but through self-denial, prayers, and hymn singing. Carp Strigolnik, who preached this doctrine in Novgorod during the 14th century, clarified that St. Paul taught that simple-minded people should teach one another; therefore, they chose their “teachers” from among themselves as spiritual leaders and did not have designated priests. Prayers were to be said in private homes, not in dedicated buildings like churches. Ordination was given by the congregation rather than by a specific minister. The congregation was considered the “elect,” and every member could attain the perfection of Christ and become a Christ or “Chlist.” Marriage was not seen as a sacrament. The Bogomils refused to fast on Mondays and Fridays and rejected monasticism. They claimed that Christ was the Son of God only through grace, like other prophets, and that the bread and wine of the Eucharist were not transformed into flesh and blood; they believed the final judgment would be carried out by God, not Jesus; that images and the cross were idols; and that the veneration of saints and relics was a form of idolatry.
These Paulician doctrines have survived in the great Russian sects, and can be traced back to the teachings and practice of the Bogomils. But in addition to these doctrines of an adoptionist origin, they held the Manichaean dualistic conception of the origin of the world. This has been partly preserved in some of their literary remains, and has taken deep root in the beliefs and traditions of the Bulgarians and other nations with whom they had come into close contact. The chief literature of all the heretical sects throughout the ages has been that of apocryphal Biblical narratives, and the popes Jeremiah or Bogumil are directly mentioned as authors of such forbidden books “which no orthodox dare read.” Though these writings are mostly the same in origin as are known from the older lists of apocryphal books, they underwent in this case a certain modification at the hands of their Bogomil editors, so as to be used for the propagation of their own specific doctrines. In its most simple and attractive form—one at the same time invested with the authority of the reputed holy author—their account of the creation of the world and of man; the origin of sin and redemption, the history of the Cross, and the disputes between body and soul, right and wrong, heaven and hell, were embodied either in “Historiated Bibles” (Paleya1) or in special dialogues held between Christ and his disciples, or between renowned Fathers of the Church who expounded these views in a simple manner adapted to the understanding of the people (Lucidaria). The Bogomils taught that God had two sons, the elder Satanail and the younger Michael. The elder son rebelled against the father and became the evil spirit. After his fall he created the lower heavens and the earth and tried in vain to create man; in the end he had to appeal to God for the Spirit. After creation Adam was allowed to till the ground on condition that he sold himself and his posterity to the owner of the earth. Then Michael was sent in the form of a man; he became identified with Jesus, and was “elected” by God after the baptism in the Jordan. When the Holy Ghost (Michael) appeared in the shape of the dove, Jesus received power to break the covenant in the form of a clay tablet (hierographon) held by Satanail from Adam. He had now become the angel Michael in a human form; as such he vanquished Satanail, and deprived him of the termination -il = God, in which his power resided. Satanail was thus transformed into Satan. Through his machinations the crucifixion took place, and Satan was the originator of the whole Orthodox community with its churches, vestments, ceremonies, sacraments and fasts, with its monks and priests. This world being the work of Satan, the perfect must eschew any and every excess of its pleasure. But the Bogomils did not go as far as to recommend asceticism. They held the “Lord’s Prayer” in high respect as the most 120 potent weapon against Satan, and had a number of conjurations against “evil spirits.” Each community had its own twelve “apostles,” and women could be raised to the rank of “elect.” The Bogomils wore garments like mendicant friars and were known as keen missionaries, travelling far and wide to propagate their doctrines. Healing the sick and conjuring the evil spirit, they traversed different countries and spread their apocryphal literature along with some of the books of the Old Testament, deeply influencing the religious spirit of the nations, and preparing them for the Reformation. They sowed the seeds of a rich religious popular literature in the East as well as in the West. The Historiated Bible, the Letter from Heaven, the Wanderings through Heaven and Hell, the numerous Adam and Cross legends, the religious poems of the “Kalëki perehozhie” and other similar productions owe their dissemination to a large extent to the activity of the Bogomils of Bulgaria, and their successors in other lands.
These Paulician beliefs have continued in the major Russian sects and can be traced back to the teachings and practices of the Bogomils. Besides these adoptionist doctrines, they also embraced the Manichaean dualistic view of the world's origin. This has been partly preserved in some of their written works and has taken firm root in the beliefs and traditions of the Bulgarians and other nations they were closely connected with. The main literature of all heretical sects throughout history has been that of apocryphal Biblical stories, and the popes Jeremiah or Bogumil are specifically mentioned as authors of such forbidden texts “which no orthodox dare read.” Although these writings mostly share the same origins as those in older lists of apocryphal books, they underwent some modifications by their Bogomil editors to promote their own specific doctrines. In its simplest and most appealing form—one that also carried the authority of the reputed holy author—their narrative of the creation of the world and humanity; the origin of sin and redemption, the story of the Cross, and the conflicts between body and soul, right and wrong, heaven and hell were presented either in “Historiated Bibles” (Paleya1) or in special dialogues between Christ and his disciples, or between well-known Fathers of the Church who explained these ideas in a straightforward way suitable for the people (Lucidaria). The Bogomils taught that God had two sons, the elder Satanail and the younger Michael. The elder son rebelled against the father and became the evil spirit. After his fall, he created the lower heavens and the earth and tried unsuccessfully to create man; in the end, he had to ask God for the Spirit. After creation, Adam was allowed to work the land on the condition that he sold himself and his descendants to the owner of the earth. Then Michael was sent in human form; he became identified with Jesus and was “elected” by God after the baptism in the Jordan. When the Holy Ghost (Michael) appeared as a dove, Jesus received the power to break the covenant in the form of a clay tablet (hierographon) held by Satanail from Adam. He had now transformed into the angel Michael in human form; as such, he defeated Satanail and stripped him of the suffix -il = God, where his power resided. Satanail was then changed into Satan. Through his schemes, the crucifixion occurred, and Satan was the founder of the entire Orthodox community with its churches, vestments, ceremonies, sacraments, and fasts, along with its monks and priests. This world being the work of Satan, the perfect must avoid any and every excess of its pleasures. However, the Bogomils didn’t go so far as to advocate asceticism. They held the “Lord’s Prayer” in high regard as the most potent weapon against Satan and had a number of rituals against “evil spirits.” Each community had its own twelve “apostles,” and women could achieve the rank of “elect.” The Bogomils wore garments similar to those of mendicant friars and were known as enthusiastic missionaries, traveling widely to spread their beliefs. Healing the sick and driving out evil spirits, they journeyed across various countries and shared their apocryphal literature along with some of the Old Testament books, significantly influencing the religious spirit of nations and preparing them for the Reformation. They planted the seeds of a rich popular religious literature in both the East and the West. The Historiated Bible, the Letter from Heaven, the Wanderings through Heaven and Hell, numerous Adam and Cross legends, and the religious poems of the “Kalëki perehozhie” and other similar works owe their spread largely to the efforts of the Bogomils of Bulgaria and their successors in other lands.
History.—The Bogomil propaganda follows the mountain chains of central Europe, starting from the Balkans and continuing along the Carpathian Mountains, the Alps and the Pyrenees, with ramifications north and south (Germany, England and Spain). In the middle of the 8th century the emperor Constantine Copronymus settled a number of Armenian Paulicians in Thracia. These were noted heretics and were persecuted by the Greek Church with fire and sword. The empress Theodora killed, drowned or hanged no fewer than 100,000. In the 10th century the emperor John Zimisces, himself of Armenian origin, transplanted no less than 200,000 Armenian Paulicians to Europe and settled them in the neighbourhood of Philippopolis, which henceforth became the centre of a far-reaching propaganda. Settled along the Balkans as a kind of bulwark against the invading Bulgars, the Armenians on the contrary soon fraternized with the newcomers, whom they converted to their own views; even a prince of the Bulgarians adopted their teaching. According to Slavonic documents the founder of this sect was a certain priest Bogumil, who “imbibed the Manichaean teaching and flourished at the time of the Bulgarian emperor Peter” (927-968). According to another source the founder was called Jeremiah (or there was another priest associated with him by the name of Jeremiah). The Slavonic sources are unanimous on the point that his teaching was Manichaean. A Synodikon from the year 1210 adds the names of his pupils or “apostles,” Mihail, Todur, Dobri, Stefan, Vasilie and Peter, all thoroughly Slavonic names. Zealous missionaries carried their doctrines far and wide. In 1004, scarcely 15 years after the introduction of Christianity into Russia, we hear of a priest Adrian teaching the same doctrines as the Bogomils. He was imprisoned by Leontie, bishop of Kiev. In 1125 the Church in the south of Russia had to combat another heresiarch named Dmitri. The Church in Bulgaria also tried to extirpate Bogomilism. The popes in Rome whilst leading the Crusade against the Albigenses did not forget their counterpart in the Balkans and recommended the annihilation of the heretics.
History.—The Bogomil movement spread through the mountain ranges of central Europe, starting from the Balkans and continuing along the Carpathian Mountains, the Alps, and the Pyrenees, with branches extending north and south (Germany, England, and Spain). In the middle of the 8th century, Emperor Constantine Copronymus settled a number of Armenian Paulicians in Thrace. These individuals were known heretics and faced persecution from the Greek Church, suffering greatly. Empress Theodora was responsible for the deaths of at least 100,000, through methods such as execution and drowning. By the 10th century, Emperor John Zimisces, who was also of Armenian descent, relocated around 200,000 Armenian Paulicians to Europe, settling them near Philippopolis, which then became a significant center for their movement. The Armenians, intended as a barrier against the invading Bulgarians, quickly formed alliances with the newcomers and converted them to their beliefs; even a Bulgarian prince embraced their teachings. According to Slavic records, the founder of this sect was a priest named Bogumil, who “absorbed Manichaean teachings and thrived during the reign of Bulgarian Emperor Peter” (927-968). Another source mentions a founder named Jeremiah, or possibly a different priest associated with him by that name. Slavic sources agree that his teachings were Manichaean. A Synodikon from 1210 lists the names of his disciples or “apostles”: Mihail, Todur, Dobri, Stefan, Vasilie, and Peter, all distinctly Slavic names. Dedicated missionaries spread their doctrines widely. In 1004, just 15 years after the establishment of Christianity in Russia, there are accounts of a priest named Adrian teaching the same ideas as the Bogomils. He was imprisoned by Leontie, the bishop of Kiev. In 1125, the Church in southern Russia faced another heretic named Dmitri. The Church in Bulgaria also attempted to eradicate Bogomilism. While leading the Crusade against the Albigenses, the popes in Rome did not overlook their counterparts in the Balkans and pushed for the elimination of the heretics.
The Bogomils spread westwards, and settled first in Servia; but at the end of the 12th century Stephen Nemanya, king of Servia, persecuted them and expelled them from the country. Large numbers took refuge in Bosnia, where they were known under the name of Patarenes (q.v.) or Patareni. From Bosnia their influence extended into Italy (Piedmont). The Hungarians undertook many crusades against the heretics in Bosnia, but towards the close of the 15th century the conquest of that country by the Turks put an end to their persecution. It is alleged that a large number of the Bosnian Paterenes, and especially the nobles, embraced Islam (see Bosnia and Herzegovina: History). Few or no remnants of Bogomilism have survived in Bosnia. The Ritual in Slavonic written by the Bosnian Radoslavov, and published in vol. xv. of the Starine of the South Slavonic Academy at Agram, shows great resemblance to the Cathar ritual published by Cunitz, 1853. See F. Racki, “Bogomili i Paternai” in Rad, vols. vii., viii. and x. (Agram, 1870); Döllinger, Beiträge zur Ketzergeschichte d. Mittelalters, 2 vols. (Munich, 1890).
The Bogomils moved westward and first settled in Serbia; however, by the end of the 12th century, Stephen Nemanja, the king of Serbia, persecuted them and drove them out of the country. Many sought refuge in Bosnia, where they were known as Patarenes (q.v.) or Patareni. From Bosnia, their influence spread into Italy (Piedmont). The Hungarians launched several crusades against the heretics in Bosnia, but by the late 15th century, the Turkish conquest of that area ended their persecution. It's said that a significant number of the Bosnian Patarenes, especially the nobles, converted to Islam (see Bosnia and Herzegovina: History). Very few, if any, remnants of Bogomilism have survived in Bosnia. The Ritual in Slavonic, written by the Bosnian Radoslavov and published in vol. xv. of the Starine of the South Slavonic Academy in Agram, bears a strong resemblance to the Cathar ritual published by Cunitz in 1853. See F. Racki, “Bogomili i Paternai” in Rad, vols. vii., viii., and x. (Agram, 1870); Döllinger, Beiträge zur Ketzergeschichte d. Mittelalters, 2 vols. (Munich, 1890).
Under Turkish rule the Bogomils lived unmolested as Pavlikeni in their ancient stronghold near Philippopolis, and farther northward. In 1650 the Roman Catholic Church gathered them into its fold. No less than fourteen villages near Nicopolis embraced Catholicism, and a colony of Pavlikeni in the village of Cioplea near Bucharest followed the example of their brethren across the Danube.
Under Turkish rule, the Bogomils lived peacefully as Pavlikeni in their ancient stronghold near Philippopolis and further north. In 1650, the Roman Catholic Church brought them into its fold. No fewer than fourteen villages near Nicopolis converted to Catholicism, and a group of Pavlikeni in the village of Cioplea near Bucharest followed the example of their fellow believers across the Danube.
Bibliography.—Euthymius Zygadenus, Narratio de Bogomilis, ed. Gieseler (Göttingen, 1842); J.C. Wolf, Historia Bogomilorum (Wittenberg, 1712); “Slovo svyatago Kozmyi na eretiki,” in Kukuljević Sakcinski, Arkiv zapovyestnicu jugoslavensku, vol. iv. pp. 69-97 (Agram, 1859); C.J. Jireček, Geschichte d. Bulgaren, pp. 155, 174-175 (Prague, 1876); Korolev, “Dogmatichesko-to uchenie na Bogomil-tie,” in Periodichesko spisanie, vols. vii.-viii. pp. 75-106 (Braila, 1873); A. Lombard, Pauliciens, Bulgares et Bons-hommes (Geneva, 1879); Episcopul Melchisedek, Lipovenismul, pp. 265 sqq. (Bucharest, 1871); B.P. Hasdeu, Cuvente den bătrăni, vol. ii. pp. 247 sqq. (Bucharest, 1879); F.C. Conybeare, The Key of Truth, pp. 73 sqq. and specially pp. 138 sqq. (Oxford, 1898); M. Gaster, Greeko-Slavonic Literature, pp. 17 sqq. (London, 1887); O. Dähnhardt, Natursagen, vol. i. pp. 38 sqq. (Leipzig and Berlin, 1907).
References.—Euthymius Zygadenus, Narratio de Bogomilis, ed. Gieseler (Göttingen, 1842); J.C. Wolf, Historia Bogomilorum (Wittenberg, 1712); “Slovo svyatago Kozmyi na eretiki,” in Kukuljević Sakcinski, Arkiv zapovyestnicu jugoslavensku, vol. iv. pp. 69-97 (Agram, 1859); C.J. Jireček, Geschichte d. Bulgaren, pp. 155, 174-175 (Prague, 1876); Korolev, “Dogmatichesko-to uchenie na Bogomil-tie,” in Periodichesko spisanie, vols. vii.-viii. pp. 75-106 (Braila, 1873); A. Lombard, Pauliciens, Bulgares et Bons-hommes (Geneva, 1879); Episcopul Melchisedek, Lipovenismul, pp. 265 sqq. (Bucharest, 1871); B.P. Hasdeu, Cuvente den bătrăni, vol. ii. pp. 247 sqq. (Bucharest, 1879); F.C. Conybeare, The Key of Truth, pp. 73 sqq. and specially pp. 138 sqq. (Oxford, 1898); M. Gaster, Greeko-Slavonic Literature, pp. 17 sqq. (London, 1887); O. Dähnhardt, Natursagen, vol. i. pp. 38 sqq. (Leipzig and Berlin, 1907).
1 These betray their Gnostic (Marcianite) spirit by the anti-Jewish tone of the oldest MSS. extant, though this prejudice tends to decrease in later MSS.
1 These reveal their Gnostic (Marcianite) influence through the anti-Jewish tone of the oldest surviving manuscripts, although this bias seems to lessen in later manuscripts.
BOGOS (Bilens), a pastoral race of mixed Hamitic descent, occupying the highlands immediately north of Abyssinia, now part of the Italian colony of Eritrea. They were formerly a self-governing community, though subject to Abyssinia. The community is divided into two classes, the Shumaglieh or “elders” and Tigré or “clients.” The latter are serfs of the former, who, however, cannot sell them. The Tigré goes with the land, and his master must protect him. In blood-money he is worth another Tigré or ninety-three cows, while an elder’s life is valued at one hundred and fifty-eight cattle or one of his own caste. The eldest son of a Shumaglieh inherits his father’s two-edged sword, white cows, lands and slaves, but the house goes to the youngest son. Female chastity is much valued, but women have no rights, inherit nothing, and are classed with the hyaena, the most despised animal throughout Abyssinia. The Bogo husband never sees the face or pronounces the name of his mother-in-law, while it is a crime for a wife to utter her husband’s or father-in-law’s name.
BOGO deals (Car) are a pastoral group of mixed Hamitic descent living in the highlands just north of Abyssinia, now part of the Italian colony of Eritrea. They were once a self-governing community, though they were subject to Abyssinia. The community is split into two classes: the Shumaglieh or “elders,” and Tigré or “clients.” The Tigré are serfs of the elders, but the elders cannot sell them. The Tigré belong to the land, and their masters must protect them. In terms of blood-money, a Tigré is worth another Tigré or ninety-three cows, while an elder's life is valued at one hundred and fifty-eight cattle or one of his own caste. The eldest son of a Shumaglieh inherits his father’s double-edged sword, white cows, lands, and slaves, but the house goes to the youngest son. Female chastity is highly valued, but women have no rights, inherit nothing, and are regarded as equivalent to the hyaena, the most despised animal in Abyssinia. The Bogo husband never sees the face or says the name of his mother-in-law, and it is considered a crime for a wife to say her husband’s or father-in-law’s name.
BOGOTÁ, or Santa Fé de Bogotá, the capital of the republic of Colombia, and of the interior department of Cundinamarca, in 4° 6′ N. lat. and 78° 30′ W. long. Pop. about 125,000. The city is on the eastern margin of a large elevated plateau 8563 ft. above sea-level. The plateau may be described as a great bench or shelf on the western slope of the oriental Cordilleras, about 70 m. long and 30 m. wide, with a low rim on its western margin and backed by a high ridge on the east. The plain forming the plateau is well watered with numerous small lakes and streams. These several small streams, one of which, the San Francisco, passes through the city, unite near the south-western extremity of the plateau and form the Rio Funza, or Bogotá, which finally plunges over the edge at Tequendama in a beautiful, perpendicular fall of about 475 ft. The city is built upon a sloping plain at the base of two high mountains La Gaudalupe and Monserrate, upon whose crests stand two imposing churches. From a broad avenue on the upper side downward to the west slope the streets, through which run streams of cool, fresh water from the mountains above. The north and south streets cross these at right angles, and the blocks thus formed are like great terraces. A number of handsomely-laid-out plazas, or squares, ornamented with gardens and statuary, have been preserved; on these face the principal public buildings and churches. In Plaza Bolivar is a statue of Bolivar by Pietro Tenerani (1789-1869), a pupil of Canova, and in Plaza Santandér is one of General Francisco de Paula Santandér (1792-1840). Facing on Plaza de la Constitución are the capitol and cathedral. The streets are narrow and straight, but as a rule they are clean and well paved. Owing to the prevalence of earthquakes, private houses are usually of one storey only, and are built of sun-dried bricks, 121 white-washed. But few of the public buildings are imposing in appearance, though good taste in style and decoration are often shown.
BOGOTÁ, or Bogotá, the capital of Colombia and the central department of Cundinamarca, is located at 4° 6′ N latitude and 78° 30′ W longitude. Its population is around 125,000. The city sits on the eastern side of a large elevated plateau, which is 8,563 feet above sea level. This plateau can be described as a massive bench or shelf on the western slope of the oriental Cordilleras, measuring about 70 miles long and 30 miles wide. It has a low rim on its western edge and is backed by a high ridge on the east. The plain of the plateau has plenty of fresh water from various small lakes and streams. Several of these streams, including the San Francisco, flow through the city and converge near the southwestern end of the plateau, forming the Rio Funza, or Bogotá, which cascades over the edge at Tequendama in a stunning, vertical drop of about 475 feet. The city is built on a sloping plain at the base of two tall mountains, La Guadalupe and Monserrate, where two impressive churches stand on their peaks. From a wide avenue on the higher side, the streets slope down to the west and are lined with streams of cool, fresh water from the mountains above. North and south streets intersect these at right angles, creating large terrace-like blocks. There are several beautifully designed plazas or squares adorned with gardens and statues, facing the main public buildings and churches. In Plaza Bolívar, there’s a statue of Bolívar by Pietro Tenerani (1789-1869), a student of Canova, and in Plaza Santander, there’s one of General Francisco de Paula Santander (1792-1840). The capitol and cathedral face Plaza de la Constitución. The streets are narrow and straight, but generally clean and well-paved. Due to frequent earthquakes, most private homes are usually only one story high and are made of sun-dried bricks, which are whitewashed. While few public buildings are particularly grand, many exhibit good taste in style and decoration. 121
The city occupies an area of about 2½ × 1½ m. It has street cars, electric light and telephones. Short lines of railway connect it with Facatativa (24 m.) on the road to Honda, and with Zipaquira, where extensive salt mines are worked. A line of railway was also under construction in 1906 to Jirardot, at the head of navigation on the upper Magdalena. Bogotá is an archiepiscopal see, founded in 1561, and is one of the strongholds of medieval clericalism in South America. It has a cathedral, rebuilt in 1814, and some 30 other churches, together with many old conventual buildings now used for secular purposes, their religious communities having been dissolved by Mosquera and their revenues devoted in great measure to education. The capitol, which is occupied by the executive and legislative departments, is an elegant and spacious building, erected since 1875. The interest which Bogotá has always taken in education, and because of which she has been called the “Athens of South America,” is shown in the number and character of her institutions of learning—a university, three endowed colleges, a school of chemistry and mineralogy, a national academy, a military school, a public library with some 50,000 volumes, a national observatory, a natural history museum and a botanic garden. The city also possesses a well-equipped mint, little used in recent years. The plain surrounding the city is very fertile, and pastures cattle and produces cereals, vegetables and fruit in abundance. It was the centre of Chibcha civilization before the Spanish conquest and sustained a large population. The climate is mild and temperate, the average annual temperature being about 58° and the rainfall about 43½ in. The geographical location of the city is unfavourable to any great development in commerce and manufactures beyond local needs.
The city covers an area of about 2½ × 1½ miles. It has streetcars, electric lights, and telephones. Short railway lines connect it with Facatativa (24 miles away) on the route to Honda, and with Zipaquira, where extensive salt mines are operated. A railway line was also under construction in 1906 to Jirardot, at the head of navigation on the upper Magdalena. Bogotá is an archiepiscopal seat, founded in 1561, and is one of the strongholds of medieval clericalism in South America. It has a cathedral, rebuilt in 1814, and about 30 other churches, along with many old convent buildings now used for secular purposes, as their religious communities were dissolved by Mosquera and their revenues largely redirected towards education. The capitol, which houses the executive and legislative branches, is an elegant and spacious building constructed since 1875. The interest that Bogotá has always had in education, which has led to it being called the “Athens of South America,” is reflected in the number and type of its educational institutions—a university, three endowed colleges, a school of chemistry and mineralogy, a national academy, a military school, a public library with around 50,000 volumes, a national observatory, a natural history museum, and a botanical garden. The city also has a well-equipped mint, which has seen little use in recent years. The surrounding plain is very fertile, supporting cattle pastures and producing cereals, vegetables, and fruits in abundance. It was the center of Chibcha civilization before the Spanish conquest and had a large population. The climate is mild and temperate, with an average annual temperature of about 58°F and annual rainfall of about 43½ inches. The city's geographical location is not ideal for significant development in commerce and manufacturing beyond local needs.
Bogotá was founded in 1538 by Gonzalo Jiménez de Quesada and was named Santa Fé de Bogotá after his birthplace Santa Fé, and after the southern capital of the Chibchas, Bacatá (or Funza). It was made the capital of the viceroyalty of Nueva Granada, and soon became one of the centres of Spanish colonial power and civilization on the South American continent. In 1811 its citizens revolted against Spanish rule and set up a government of their own, but in 1816 the city was occupied by Pablo Morillo (1777-1838), the Spanish general, who subjected it to a ruthless military government until 1819, when Bolivar’s victory at Boyacá compelled its evacuation. On the creation of the republic of Colombia, Bogotá became its capital, and when that republic was dissolved into its three constituent parts it remained the capital of Nueva Granada. It has been the scene of many important events in the chequered history of Colombia.
Bogotá was founded in 1538 by Gonzalo Jiménez de Quesada and was named Santa Fé de Bogotá after his hometown Santa Fé, and after the southern capital of the Chibchas, Bacatá (or Funza). It became the capital of the viceroyalty of Nueva Granada and quickly emerged as one of the centers of Spanish colonial power and civilization in South America. In 1811, its citizens revolted against Spanish rule and established their own government, but in 1816, the city was taken over by Pablo Morillo (1777-1838), the Spanish general, who imposed a harsh military regime until 1819, when Bolívar’s victory at Boyacá forced its evacuation. When the republic of Colombia was created, Bogotá became its capital, and when that republic was divided into its three parts, it continued to be the capital of Nueva Granada. It has been the site of many significant events in Colombia's complicated history.
BOGRA, or Bagura, a town and district of British India, in the Rajshahi division of eastern Bengal and Assam. The town is situated on the right bank of the river Karatoya. Pop. (1901) 7094. The District of Bogra, which was first formed in 1821, lies west of the main channel of the Brahmaputra. It contains an area of 1359 sq. m. In 1901 the population (on a reduced area) was 854,533, showing an increase of 11% in the decade. The district stretches out in a level plain, intersected by numerous streams and dotted with patches of jungle. The Karatoya river flows from north to south, dividing it into two portions, possessing very distinct characteristics. The eastern tract consists of rich alluvial soil, well watered, and subject to fertilizing inundations, yielding heavy crops of coarse rice, oil-seeds and jute. The western portion of the district is high-lying and produces the finer qualities of rice. The principal rivers are formed by the different channels of the Brahmaputra, which river here bears the local names of the Konai, the Daokoba and the Jamuna, the last forming a portion of the eastern boundary of the district. Its bed is studded with alluvial islands. The Brahmaputra and its channels, together with three minor streams, the Bangali, Karatoya and Atrai, afford admirable facilities for commerce, and render every part of the district accessible to native cargo boats of large burden. The rivers swarm with fish. The former production of indigo is extinct, and the industry of silk-spinning is decaying. There is no town with as many as 10,000 inhabitants, trade being conducted at riverside marts. Nor are there any metalled roads. Several lines of railway (the Eastern Bengal, &c.), however, serve the district.
BOGRA, or Bagura is a town and district in British India, located in the Rajshahi division of eastern Bengal and Assam. The town is on the right bank of the Karatoya River. Population (1901) was 7,094. The Bogra District, established in 1821, lies west of the main channel of the Brahmaputra River. It covers an area of 1,359 square miles. In 1901, the population in a smaller area was 854,533, which was an 11% increase over the past decade. The district is flat, crisscrossed by many streams, and has patches of jungle. The Karatoya River flows from north to south, dividing the district into two areas with distinct features. The eastern part has fertile alluvial soil, is well-watered, and experiences beneficial floods, which supports abundant crops of coarse rice, oil-seeds, and jute. The western area is elevated and produces higher quality rice. The main rivers are various channels of the Brahmaputra, which here are known as the Konai, the Daokoba, and the Jamuna, with the last forming part of the district's eastern boundary. Its riverbed is filled with alluvial islands. The Brahmaputra and its channels, along with three smaller rivers—the Bangali, Karatoya, and Atrai—provide excellent opportunities for trade and make every part of the district accessible to large cargo boats. The rivers are teeming with fish. The previous production of indigo has ended, and the silk-spinning industry is in decline. There is no town with a population of over 10,000, and trade is conducted at riverside markets. Additionally, there are no paved roads, but several railway lines (like the Eastern Bengal, etc.) serve the district.
BOGUE, DAVID (1750-1825), British nonconformist divine, was born in the parish of Coldingham, Berwickshire. After a course of study in Edinburgh, he was licensed to preach by the Church of Scotland, but made his way to London (1721), where he taught in schools at Edmonton, Hampstead and Camberwell. He then settled as minister of the Congregational church at Gosport in Hampshire (1777), and to his pastoral duties added the charge of an institution for preparing men for the ministry. It was the age of the new-born missionary enterprise, and Bogue’s academy was in a very large measure the seed from which the London Missionary Society took its growth. Bogue himself would have gone to India in 1796 but for the opposition of the East India Company. He also had much to do with founding the British and Foreign Bible Society and the Religious Tract Society, and in conjunction with James Bennet, minister at Romsey, wrote a well-known History of Dissenters (3 vols., 1809). Another of his writings was an Essay on the Divine Authority of the New Testament. He died at Brighton on the 25th of October 1825.
BOGUE, DAVID (1750-1825), British nonconformist minister, was born in the parish of Coldingham, Berwickshire. After studying in Edinburgh, he was licensed to preach by the Church of Scotland but moved to London (1721), where he taught in schools at Edmonton, Hampstead, and Camberwell. He later became the minister of the Congregational church in Gosport, Hampshire (1777), and alongside his pastoral responsibilities, he took charge of a program to prepare men for the ministry. It was the era of the emerging missionary movement, and Bogue’s academy played a significant role in the development of the London Missionary Society. Bogue was also set to go to India in 1796, but the East India Company opposed his plans. He played a key role in founding the British and Foreign Bible Society and the Religious Tract Society and, along with James Bennet, minister at Romsey, wrote a well-known History of Dissenters (3 vols., 1809). Another notable work of his was an Essay on the Divine Authority of the New Testament. He died in Brighton on October 25, 1825.
BOGUS (of uncertain origin, possibly connected with the Fr. bagasse, sugar-cane refuse), a slang word, originally used in America of the apparatus employed in counterfeiting coins, and now generally of any sham or spurious transaction.
BOGUS (origin unclear, possibly linked to the Fr. bagasse, which means sugar-cane waste), a slang term that originally referred to the tools used for counterfeiting coins in America, and now commonly refers to any fake or deceitful transaction.
BOHEA (a word derived from the Wu-i hills in the Fuhkien province of China, b being substituted for W or V), a kind of black tea (q.v.), or, in the 18th and early 19th centuries, tea generally, as in Pope’s line, “So past her time ’twixt reading and bohea.” Later the name “bohea” has been applied to an inferior quality of tea grown late in the season.
BOHEA (a term that comes from the Wu-i hills in the Fuhkien province of China, with b replacing W or V), refers to a type of black tea (q.v.) or, during the 18th and early 19th centuries, tea in general, like in Pope’s line, “So past her time ’twixt reading and bohea.” Later on, the name “bohea” was given to a lower quality of tea that was harvested late in the season.
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!