This is a modern-English version of Dress design : an account of costume for artists & dressmakers, originally written by Hughes, Talbot.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
E-text prepared by Constanze Hofmann, Suzanne Shell,
and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team
(http://www.pgdp.net)
E-text prepared by Constanze Hofmann, Suzanne Shell,
and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team
(http://www.pgdp.net)
Transcriber's Note:
Note from the Transcriber:
A number of typographical errors have been corrected. They are shown in the text with mouse-hover popups. Hover the cursor over the marked text and the nature of the correction will appear.
A number of typos have been fixed. They are displayed in the text with mouse-hover popups. Hover your cursor over the highlighted text to see what was corrected.
All greyscale images have been provided as thumbnails. A larger version of those images is available by clicking on the link below the image.
All greyscale images are available as thumbnails. You can view a larger version of each image by clicking the link below it.
The numerous full page images have been moved to the nearest paragraph break, the page numbers for these pages have been omitted. Where the index links to such a page, the link goes directly to the image in question.
The full-page images have been relocated to the nearest paragraph break, and the page numbers for these pages have been removed. When the index links to such a page, the link goes straight to the specific image.
THE ARTISTIC CRAFTS SERIES
OF TECHNICAL HANDBOOKS
EDITED BY W. R. LETHABY
THE ARTISTIC CRAFTS SERIES
OF TECHNICAL HANDBOOKS
EDITED BY W. R. LETHABY
DRESS DESIGN
Fashion Design

A Long-trained Muslin Dress. About 1800.
A Long-trained Muslin Dress. Around 1800.
DRESS DESIGN
AN ACCOUNT OF COSTUME FOR ARTISTS & DRESSMAKERS BY TALBOT HUGHES · ILLUSTRATED BY THE AUTHOR FROM OLD EXAMPLES · TOGETHER WITH 35 PAGES OF HALF-TONE ILLUSTRATIONS
AN ACCOUNT OF COSTUME FOR ARTISTS & DRESSMAKERS BY TALBOT HUGHES · ILLUSTRATED BY THE AUTHOR FROM OLD EXAMPLES · TOGETHER WITH 35 PAGES OF HALF-TONE ILLUSTRATIONS
LONDON
SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LTD.
Bath, Melbourne, Toronto, and New York
LONDON
SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LTD.
Bath, Melbourne, Toronto, and New York
Reprinted 1920
Reprinted 1920
GENERAL PREFACE TO THE SERIES[xi]
In issuing this volume of a series of Handbooks on the Artistic Crafts, it will be well to state what are our general aims.
In releasing this volume of a series of Handbooks on the Artistic Crafts, it's important to outline our main goals.
In the first place, we wish to provide trustworthy text-books of workshop practice, from the points of view of experts who have critically examined the methods current in the shops, and putting aside vain survivals, are prepared to say what is good workmanship, and to set up a standard of quality in the crafts which are more especially associated with design. Secondly, in doing this, we hope to treat design itself as an essential part of good workmanship. During the last century most of the arts, save painting[xii] and sculpture of an academic kind, were little considered, and there was a tendency to look on "design" as a mere matter of appearance. Such "ornamentation" as there was was usually obtained by following in a mechanical way a drawing provided by an artist who often knew little of the technical processes involved in production. With the critical attention given to the crafts by Ruskin and Morris, it came to be seen that it was impossible to detach design from craft in this way, and that, in the widest sense, true design is an inseparable element of good quality, involving as it does the selection of good and suitable material, contrivance for special purpose, expert workmanship, proper finish and so on, far more than mere ornament, and indeed, that ornamentation itself was rather an exuberance of fine workmanship than a matter of merely abstract lines. Workmanship when separated by too wide a gulf from fresh thought—that is, from design—inevitably decays, and, on the other hand,[xiii] ornamentation, divorced from workmanship, is necessarily unreal, and quickly falls into affectation. Proper ornamentation may be defined as a language addressed to the eye; it is pleasant thought expressed in the speech of the tool.
First, we want to provide reliable textbooks on workshop practices, based on insights from experts who have critically assessed current methods in the shops. They set aside outdated practices and are ready to define what good workmanship is and establish a standard of quality in crafts closely linked to design. Secondly, in doing this, we aim to treat design as a key aspect of good workmanship. Over the past century, most arts, except for painting[xii] and academic sculpture, weren’t given much attention, leading to the view that “design” was just about appearance. The “ornamentation” that existed was usually just a mechanical reproduction of drawings made by artists who often didn’t understand the technical processes involved in production. With the critical focus on crafts by Ruskin and Morris, it became clear that design and craft could not be separated in this way; true design, in its broadest sense, is an essential part of quality, encompassing the selection of appropriate materials, purpose-driven designs, expert workmanship, proper finishing, and more—far beyond just being decorative. In fact, ornamentation is better seen as a flourish of excellent workmanship rather than merely abstract lines. When workmanship is too detached from fresh ideas—that is, design—it inevitably declines. Conversely,[xiii] ornamentation, detached from workmanship, is untrue and quickly becomes pretentious. Proper ornamentation can be defined as a visual language; it's thoughtful expression communicated through the tool's work.
In the third place, we would have this series put artistic craftsmanship before people as furnishing reasonable occupations for those who would gain a livelihood. Although within the bounds of academic art, the competition, of its kind, is so acute that only a very few per cent. can fairly hope to succeed as painters and sculptors; yet, as artistic craftsmen, there is every probability that nearly every one who would pass through a sufficient period of apprenticeship to workmanship and design would reach a measure of success.
In the third place, we want this series to prioritize artistic craftsmanship as it provides meaningful jobs for those seeking to make a living. While within the realm of academic art, the competition is so fierce that only a small percentage can realistically expect to succeed as painters and sculptors; however, as artistic craftsmen, there’s a good chance that almost everyone who goes through enough apprenticeship in workmanship and design will achieve some level of success.
In the blending of handwork and thought in such arts as we propose to deal with, happy careers may be found as far removed from the dreary routine of hack labour, as from the terrible uncertainty[xiv] of academic art. It is desirable in every way that men of good education should be brought back into the productive crafts: there are more than enough of us "in the city," and it is probable that more consideration will be given in this century than in the last to Design and Workmanship.
In the combination of hands-on work and creativity in the arts we’re discussing, fulfilling careers can be found that are as distant from the tedious grind of unskilled labor as they are from the harsh uncertainty[xiv] of traditional academic art. It’s beneficial for well-educated individuals to return to practical crafts: there are already plenty of us "in the city," and it’s likely that this century will pay more attention to Design and Craftsmanship than the last one.
PREFACE
The designing and making of Costume is a craft—sometimes artistic—with which we are all more or less concerned. It is also, in its own way, one of the living arts, that is, it is still carried forward experimentally by experts directly attached to the "business." It has not yet been subjected to rules of good taste formulated by Academies and Universities; but when Inigo Jones, the great architect, was asked to make some designs for fancy dress, he based them on the Five Orders of Architecture, and ponderous fancies they were.[xv]
Designing and creating costumes is a craft—sometimes artistic—that we all engage with to some degree. It is also, in its own way, a living art, meaning it’s still being experimented with by professionals who are directly involved in the industry. It hasn’t been restricted by the rules of good taste established by academies and universities. However, when Inigo Jones, the famous architect, was asked to create some designs for costumes, he based them on the Five Orders of Architecture, and they were quite elaborate.[xv]
If we look for the main stem of principle on which modern Costume develops, we seem to find it in the desire for freshness, for the clean, the uncrushed, and the perfectly fitted and draped. Probably a modern lady's ideal would be to wear a dress once, and then burn it.
If we look for the main foundation of the principles that modern fashion is based on, we seem to find it in the desire for freshness, for the clean, the unwrinkled, and the perfectly fitted and draped. Probably, a modern woman's ideal would be to wear a dress once and then throw it away.
A correlative of the ideal of freshness is the delight in perfect "cut," and the rapidly changing fashions are doubtless conditioned in part by the desire for the new and unsullied. "Novelty" is a guarantee of newness.
A counterpart to the ideal of freshness is the enjoyment of a perfect "cut," and the quickly changing trends are definitely influenced, at least in part, by the desire for something new and untouched. "Novelty" ensures newness.
In such ephemeral productions it would be vain to seek for certain fine types of excellence which were once common when dresses were not so lightly cast aside. So it is necessary that we should understand what the ruling principle is, for it is one which will not be set aside at the bidding of well-meaning reformers. I will only venture to say that it would be desirable to make the attempt to separate in some degree the more constant elements of dress from those which are more variable. It[xvi] will seem a pity to more than outsiders that a "well-dressed" person need wear so little which deserves to have been made by human hands, and nothing which deserves to be preserved. Fine laces and jewels are allowed to be antique—could not the circle of such things be a little broadened? A properly groomed man carries about on him literally nothing worth looking at. We might surely look for a watch-chain with some delicacy of handiwork—something beyond mechanical reductions of iron cables. Fine buttons might conceivably be made to go with the studs, or be made of crystal, amethyst, and silver or gold. Women might allow of the transfer of fine embroidered applications from one dress to another, or make more use of clasps and the like. I am confident that when it is pointed out, it will be felt as a shortcoming that no part of a fine lady's dress need now be too good to throw away. Although the present volume is cast into the form of a history, it is also intended to be a book of suggestions;[xvii] and the hope is held that modern dressmakers may refer to it as much as, or more than, those who are interested in dress from the historical point of view.
In such fleeting fashions, it would be pointless to look for certain types of quality that used to be common when clothing was not so easily discarded. Therefore, we need to understand what the main principle is, because it won't be ignored just because well-meaning reformers suggest it. I can only say that it would be beneficial to try to differentiate somewhat between the more enduring elements of clothing and those that change frequently. It will seem unfortunate to more than just outsiders that a "well-dressed" person can wear so little that truly deserves to be handcrafted, and nothing that deserves to be kept. Fine laces and jewelry are accepted as antiques—couldn't we expand that category a bit? A well-groomed man literally carries nothing on him that is worth admiring. Surely, we could expect a watch chain with some craftsmanship—something beyond just mechanical iron cables. Fancy buttons could potentially match the studs, or be made of crystal, amethyst, and silver or gold. Women might consider transferring beautiful embroidered designs from one outfit to another or make better use of clasps and similar items. I believe that when it's pointed out, people will recognize it as a flaw that no part of a refined woman's outfit needs to be too good to discard. Although this volume is presented as a history, it also aims to be a book of suggestions; and we hope that modern dressmakers will reference it as much as, or even more than, those who are interested in fashion from a historical perspective.[xvii]
In any case the author's accurate knowledge of the facts, and his many bright sketches—which are often drawn from examples in his own remarkable collection—make the present volume an admirable handbook of English Costume. The more technical "patterns" which are included amongst the illustrations will be found most valuable to all who wish to go deeper than the first glance reveals.
In any case, the author's precise understanding of the facts and his many vivid sketches—often inspired by examples from his own impressive collection—make this volume an excellent guide to English Costume. The more detailed "patterns" included in the illustrations will be incredibly useful for anyone looking to explore beyond the surface.
W. R. LETHABY.
W. R. Lethaby.
CONTENTS[xix]
LIST OF DESCRIPTIVE LINES TO THE PLATES[xxiii]
- FRONTISPIECEFacing Title
- A Long-trained Muslin Dress, about 1800.
- PLATE IFacing page 39
- Boots and Shoes from the Fourteenth to Nineteenth Century.
- PLATE IIFacing page 42
- A. Elizabethan Robe in Plush, 1585-1605.
- B. Elizabethan Robe in Silk Brocade, 1565-85.
- C. Elizabethan Male Robe in Velvet Brocade, 1580-1615.
- D. Back-piece of Elizabethan Doublet in Embroidered Linen, 1580-1605.
- PLATE IIIFacing page 55[xxiv]
- A. Elizabethan Jump (or Jacket), about 1600.
- B. Portrait of Lady in Embroidered Costume, between 1620 and 1640.
- PLATE IVFacing p. 58
- C. Youth's Jacket of Linen embroidered in Worsted, 1635-65.
- D. Linen Male Jacket embroidered with Gold and Silk, 1600-40.
- PLATE VFacing p. 71
- A. Jerkin—Period James I.
- B. Lady's Bodice of Slashed and Vandyked Satin, 1635-50.
- C. Jerkin of Embroidered Linen, 1630-60.
- D. Jerkin of Embroidered Linen, 1580-1635.
- PLATE VIFacing page 74
- A. Collar and Cuffs set with Lace, 1600-30.
- B. Embroidered Leather Jerkin, 1620-1640.
- C. Top of Stocking, Embroidered Linen, 1625-50.
- PLATE VIIFacing page 87[xxv]
- A. Herald's Coat, Embroidered Velvet and Silk, First Half Seventeenth Century.
- B. Lady's Bodice of Black Velvet, 1630-60.
- C. Black Silk Jerkin, 1640-50.
- PLATE VIIIFacing page 90
- A., B., C. Three Suits—Period Charles II.
- PLATE VIIIAFacing p. 103
- A. Suit of Embroidered Silk, 1610-30.
- B. Three Sword-hangers Embroidered in Gold, Charles II.
- C. Braided Suit, 1670-90.
- PLATE IXFacing page 106
- A. Lady's Embroidered Silk Jacket, 1605-20.
- B. Lady's Bodice of Silk Brocade, 1680-1700.
- PLATE XFacing page 119
- A. Black Velvet Bodice, 1600-25.
- B. Five Embroidered Waistcoats, between 1690 and 1800.
- PLATE XIFacing p. 122[xxvi]
- Sixteen Leather Boots and Shoes, between 1535 and 1850.
- PLATE XIIFacing p. 135
- A. Lady's Outdoor Costume, 1785-95.
- B. Costume, Early Eighteenth Century.
- C. Silk Brocade Dress, 1760-80.
- PLATE XIIIFacing page 138
- A. Silk Coat, 1735-55.
- B. Brocade Silk Coat, 1745-60.
- C. Embroidered Cloth Coat, 1770-90.
- PLATE XIVFacing page 151
- A. Embroidered Silk Dress with Pannier, 1765-80.
- B. Brocade Dress and Quilted Petticoat, 1750-65.
- PLATE XVFacing page 154
- A. White Cloth Coat, 1775-90.
- B. Silk Dress, 1740-60.
- C. Embroidered Velvet Coat, 1753-75.
- PLATE XVIFacing page 167
- A. Silk Brocade Dress, 1740-60.
- B. Silk Brocade Sack-back Dress, 1755-1775.
- C. Dress of Striped Material, 1755-85.
- PLATE XVIIFacing page 170[xxvii]
- A. Silk Suit, 1765-80.
- B. Quilted Dress, 1700-25.
- C. Silk Embroidered Suit, 1765-80.
- PLATE XVIIIFacing p. 183
- A. Brocade Bodice, 1770-85.
- B. Flowered Silk Dress, 1750-70.
- C. Silk Brocade Bodice, 1780-95.
- PLATE XIXFacing p. 186
- A. Silk Brocade Dress, 1775-85.
- B. Embroidered Silk Jacket, 1775-90.
- C. Brocade Jacket, 1780-95.
- PLATE XXFacing page 199
- A. Gold-embroidered Muslin Dress, 1795-1805.
- B. Nine Aprons, between 1690 and 1750.
- C. Dress of Spotted Stockinette, 1795-1808.
- PLATE XXIFacing page 202
- Twenty-three Boots and Shoes, from 1800 to 1875.
- PLATE XXIIFacing page 215
- A. Linen Dress, 1795-1808.
- B. Silk Bodice, 1825-30.
- C. Silk Bodice, 1818-25.
- PLATE XXIIIFacing page 218[xxviii]
- A. Muslin Dress with Tinsel Design, 1798-1810.
- B. Silk Dress, Period George IV.
- C. Satin and Gauze Dress, 1820-30.
- PLATE XXIVFacing page 231
- A. Outdoor Silk Jacket, 1798-1808.
- B. Embroidered Muslin Bodice, 1816-1830.
- C. Embroidered Muslin Bodice, 1824-1825.
- D. Satin and Gauze Bodice, 1820-30.
- PLATE XXVFacing page 234
- A. Silk Dress, 1800-10.
- B. Cotton Dress, 1800-10.
- C. Embroidered Muslin Dress, 1820-30.
- D. Silk Gauze Dress, 1824-30.
- PLATE XXVIFacing page 247
- A. Morning Coat of Chintz, 1825-45.
- B. Cloth Coat, 1808-20.
- C. Cloth Overcoat, 1820-35.
- PLATE XXVIIFacing page 250
- Outdoor Silk Dress, 1825-35.
- PLATE XXVIIIFacing page 259[xxix]
- A. Silk Pelisse, 1820-30.
- B. Cotton Dress, 1830-40.
- C. Silk Spencer and Cape, 1818-27.
- PLATE XXIXFacing page 263
- A. Embroidered Silk Gauze Dress, 1820-30.
- B. Gauze Dress with Appliqued Design, 1825-35.
- C. Printed Linen Outdoor Dress, 1827-1847.
- PLATE XXXFacing page 266
- A. Printed Silk Bodice, 1840-50.
- B. Gathered Linen Bodice, 1837-47.
- C. Silk Bodice and Bertha, 1845-55.
- PLATE XXXIFacing page 270
- A. Embroidered Muslin Outdoor Dress, 1855-65.
- B. Riding Habit, 1845-75.
- C. Gauze Ball Dress, 1840-55.
- PLATE XXXIIFacing page 279
- A. Silk Dress, 1860-70.
- B. Gauze Walking Dress, 1850-60.
- C. Silk Dress, 1848-58.
- PLATE XXXIIIFacing page 282[xxx]
- A. Silk Dress with Court Train, 1828-1838.
- B. Silk Afternoon Dress, 1872-78.
- C. Silk Coat and Skirt, 1855-56.
DRESS DESIGN
Fashion Design
Plates originally printed in collotype are now produced in half-tone
Plates that were originally printed using collotype are now made in half-tone.
INTRODUCTION[33]
The subject of Historical Costume covers such a multitude of detail that a volume on each century could be written, with hundreds of illustrations. Thus it is, most works on costume are expensive and bewildering; but I hope this small practical handbook will be a useful addition to the many beautifully illustrated works which already exist.
The topic of Historical Costume includes so many details that a whole book could be written about each century, complete with hundreds of illustrations. That's why most costume books are costly and overwhelming; however, I hope this small practical guide will be a helpful addition to the many beautifully illustrated books that are already out there.
I have divided the matter into centuries and reigns, as far as possible, in this small work, besides separating male and female attire, thus simplifying reference. A special feature has also been made, of supplying the maker or designer of dress with actual proportions and patterns, gleaned from antique dresses, as far back as they could be obtained; and I am much indebted to the authorities at the Victoria and Albert Museum for the permission given me to examine and measure their unique specimens; also to Mr. Wade, Mr. G. G. Kilburne, Mr. Duffield, Mr. Box Kingham, Mr. Hill, Mr. Breakespeare, and others,[34] for their valuable assistance with interesting specimens. I have used outline drawings in the text, as being more clear for purposes of explanation. The dates given to the illustrations are to be taken as approximate to the time in which the style was worn. Many of the photographs have been arranged from my own costume collection, which has made so much of my research simple, reliable, and pleasant. I am also happy to state that before the final revision of this book I have heard that my collection of historical costumes and accessories will, after a preliminary exhibition at Messrs. Harrod's, be presented to the Victoria and Albert Museum as a gift to the nation by the Directors of that firm. Thus the actual dresses shown in these plates will find a permanent home in London, and become valuable examples to students of costume. The coiffures in the collotype plates are not to be judged as examples, for it would have consumed far too much time to set up these figures more perfectly, but all the bonnets, caps, and accessories given are genuine examples.
I’ve organized the content into centuries and reigns as much as possible in this brief work, while also distinguishing between male and female clothing for easier reference. A unique aspect of this book is that I've included the makers or designers of the garments along with actual measurements and patterns, drawn from antique dresses as far back as I could find. I'm very grateful to the staff at the Victoria and Albert Museum for allowing me to examine and measure their one-of-a-kind pieces; I also want to thank Mr. Wade, Mr. G. G. Kilburne, Mr. Duffield, Mr. Box Kingham, Mr. Hill, Mr. Breakespeare, and others,[34] for their valuable help with fascinating examples. I used outline drawings in the text because they make explanations clearer. The dates provided for the illustrations are approximate to the period when the style was in fashion. Many of the photographs were arranged from my costume collection, which has made a lot of my research easy, reliable, and enjoyable. I’m also pleased to share that before the final revision of this book, I learned that my collection of historical costumes and accessories will be presented to the Victoria and Albert Museum as a gift to the nation after a preliminary exhibition at Harrod's. This means that the actual dresses shown in these plates will have a permanent home in London and serve as valuable references for costume studies. The hairstyles in the collotype plates should not be considered perfect examples, as it would have taken too much time to set up those figures more accurately; however, all the bonnets, caps, and accessories shown are authentic pieces.
In a book of this size, one cannot go into the designs of materials, &c., which is a study any earnest student would not[35] neglect, but in this connection I would draw attention to the comparative colour density and proportion of designs chosen for various effects.
In a book this size, we can't dive into the details of materials, etc., which is a study that any serious student wouldn't neglect. However, I want to highlight the differences in color density and the proportion of designs selected for different effects.
It has been my endeavour to arrange a greater variety of the forms which make up the characters of each period, and also to give a wider knowledge into the footwear, or details of the footwear, than is usual in most costume books.
It has been my effort to organize a greater diversity of the styles that define the characters of each period, and also to provide a broader understanding of footwear, or details about footwear, than is typical in most costume books.
In a review of the styles I would not press any choice for building new designs, as I believe in close individual research and selection, which may utilise many interesting features from costume settings even in periods which are almost scorned. I believe the purest beauty is found in the simple forms of dress and decoration settings from the 12th to the 15th centuries, schemed to the natural proportions of the figure. The grace of line and movement is often aided by the short train, which can be so happily caught up in many ways; the slight drag of the train always keeps the front clear in outline, besides showing the movement of the limbs. Length of fall in the material was desired, the figure creating its own folds with every turn, but a belt was often placed rather high under the breast. There[36] is little reason with nature of fine form to make dress into sections by a corset waist. A long, lithe, complete curve in outline—much happier unbroken, except by the girdle—is certainly the most artistically useful conception, not breaking the rhythm (as does the harder belt), while it also induces much beauty in lifting and arranging the drapery. The long falling sleeve also has the same qualities, giving a greater fullness of shape, a variety of colour (by a difference of lining), with a winglike motion, besides softening the angle of the elbow.
In reviewing styles, I wouldn’t push for any specific choice when it comes to creating new designs. I believe in thorough individual research and selection, which can incorporate many interesting aspects from costumes, even from periods that are often overlooked. To me, the purest beauty is found in the simple forms of dress and decoration from the 12th to the 15th centuries, tailored to the natural proportions of the body. The elegance of line and movement is often enhanced by a short train, which can be styled in various ways; the slight pull of the train keeps the front silhouette clear while also highlighting the movement of the limbs. The material's length was desirable, allowing the figure to create its own folds with every turn, though a belt was typically worn high under the bust. There[36] is little reason, given the nature of fine form, to break a dress into sections with a corset waist. A long, graceful curve in outline—happier when unbroken except by the girdle—is certainly the most artistically useful idea, as it maintains the rhythm (unlike a harder belt) while also enhancing the beauty of the drapery's lift and arrangement. The long falling sleeve shares these qualities, contributing a fuller shape, a variety of colors (thanks to different linings), a wing-like movement, and softening the angle of the elbow.
I think the next garment for high esteem is the chasuble-shaped tunic (with or without sleeves). Falling cleanly from the shoulders, it stops at a charming length for the skirt to take up the flow of line. The delightful effect of partly-laced or clasped sides was not missed by the ablest designers. How refined, too, was the character of decoration of the old period! The art of concentrating effects is seen to perfection, retaining the breadth of shape and length unbroken. Jewelled embroidery of fine enrichment was wrought on the borders, neck settings, square corners, the girdle, and the clasps. The preciousness of effect was truly appreciated by the[37] enclosing of the face in the purity of white lawn and zephyr-like veilings; the circlet and the long interlaced plaits and charming nettings were all tastefully schemed. Has woman ever looked more supreme through all the centuries of extravagant styles and distortions? I believe not: but I have come to the conclusion that, at whatever period of seeming insanity of style, the woman of fine taste can overcome all obstacles by her individual choice and "set up," and has really always looked fascinating.
I think the next stylish piece is the chasuble-shaped tunic (with or without sleeves). It falls nicely from the shoulders and stops at a lovely length for the skirt to flow beautifully. The lovely effect of partially-laced or clasped sides was definitely noted by top designers. How refined, too, was the decoration of the old days! The art of creating focused details is shown perfectly, keeping the overall shape and length intact. Exquisite jeweled embroidery was crafted on the borders, necklines, square corners, the belt, and the clasps. The elegance of the look was truly enhanced by framing the face with pure white fabric and airy veils; the circlet and long intertwined braids along with charming netting were all tastefully designed. Has any woman ever looked more magnificent throughout all the centuries of extravagant styles and oddities? I don't think so: I have come to believe that no matter the chaotic fashion trends, a woman with good taste can rise above it all with her individual style and “set up,” and has always looked captivating.
There was another form of decoration at this period—the cutting of the edges into a variety of simple or foliated shapes, giving a flutter and enrichment to forms in a simple manner, and this, in conjunction with the increasing richness of materials, was a valuable aid to lighten the effects. It was probably initiated by the heraldic characteristics in vogue.
There was another way of decorating during this time—cutting the edges into various simple or leaf-like shapes, adding some flair and richness to designs in a straightforward way. This, along with the growing variety of materials, helped to make the overall effects lighter. It likely started with the popular heraldic designs.
The pricked and slashed details had much the same result in enriching surfaces.
The punctured and cut details had a similar effect in enhancing surfaces.
Later the fan sleeves of the 18th century were enhanced in a similar way by the curved and scalloped shaping, which was used as late as the Victorian sixties with happy effect on the polonaises.[38]
Later, the fan sleeves of the 18th century were improved in a similar way by using curved and scalloped designs, which continued to be popular during the Victorian sixties, creating a pleasing effect on the polonaises.[38]
Now, as regards the finest corset dress, the palm must be given to the sack-back dress of the eighteenth century (not in the period of its distortion with hoops), and a full setting showed it to greatest advantage.
Now, when it comes to the best corset dress, the top choice has to be the sack-back dress of the eighteenth century (not during its distorted hoop phase), and a complete look displayed it to its fullest potential.
This type of design lent itself to more variety in beauty of arrangement than any other; the looping, reefing, and tying always set gracefully in accord with the back fall. The easy exchange of the stomacher also gave additional chance of effect, and the beauty of the fan-shaped sleeve, with its lace falls at the elbow, was a delightful creation. How rich and refined this character could be, without the monstrous forms and head-dresses which later invaded it and turned it into ornate absurdity!
This type of design allowed for more diverse beauty in arrangement than any other; the loops, folds, and ties always looked graceful alongside the back fall. The easy swap of the stomacher also provided more opportunities for impact, and the beauty of the fan-shaped sleeve, with its lace cascades at the elbow, was a lovely creation. How rich and sophisticated this style could be, without the outlandish shapes and hairstyles that later took over and turned it into an over-the-top spectacle!
When we examine the period of Charles I, we find much charming dignity in the adaptations of earlier inventions; the collar settings were noble, indeed perfect, in arrangement, and the bodice decoration and proportions most interesting.
When we look at the time of Charles I, we see a lot of elegant dignity in the adaptations of earlier designs; the collar settings were impressive and perfectly arranged, and the decoration and proportions of the bodice were very intriguing.
For the grace of girlhood no dresses are happier than those of the early 19th century to 1830, and the inventions in trimmings through this period were prolific in beauty and lightness of style.
For the charm of girlhood, no dresses are more delightful than those from the early 19th century to 1830, and the innovations in embellishments during this time were abundant in beauty and a light style.
Analysis of the many fashion-plates and[39] original dresses of this period will well repay all interested in beautiful needlecraft and dress design. The arrangement of frills, insertions, gathered effects, applied forms, and tasselled or buttoned additions, will be found full of beauty and novelty, especially in the dresses of white embroidery. Plates XXIII and XXIV (see pp. 218-231) give some happy examples of this time.
Analyzing the many fashion plates and[39] original dresses from this era is rewarding for anyone interested in beautiful needlework and fashion design. The way frills, insertions, gathers, applied details, and tassels or buttons are arranged is full of beauty and originality, especially in the white embroidered dresses. Plates XXIII and XXIV (see pp. 218-231) showcase some great examples from this period.

Plate I.—Boots and Shoes from the 14th to the 19th Centuries.
Plate I.—Boots and Shoes from the 14th to the 19th Centuries.
- Charles II.
- James II.
- William and Mary.
- George II.
- George III., 1770.
- George III., 1760.
- George III., 1780-1800.
- 1870-1880.
- William and Mary.
- 1680-1700.
- 1680-1702.
- 1750-1775.
- 1580-1625.
- 1710-1730.
- Henry VIII.
- Semi-Clog, 1780-1800.
- Henry VIII.
- 1778-1795.
- Late 15th Century or early 16th Century.
- 1500-1540.
- Late 14th Century to middle of 15th Century.
- 1530-1555.
- 1535-1555.
A word on the most condemned flow of fashion during the Victorian era. There are many dresses of real charm to be found amongst the mass of heavy styles which must not be overlooked in studying design and style. Even the crinoline dress, when treated with the exquisite silk gauzes, as Fig. 3 in Plates XXXI and XXXIII (see pp. 270-282), was as alluring as any woman could wish, and the original design of the jacket in the latter figure, with its richly embroidered, long-skirted front cut short at the back, arranged itself perfectly on this type of undersetting. There was notable refinement of effect and beauty of proportion in many dresses of the sixties, as exemplified in Fig. A, Plate XXXII (see p. 279), the waist being set rather high, and the very full skirt carried back by the crinoline being held thus with its cross ties.
A note on the most criticized fashion trends during the Victorian era. There are many truly charming dresses among the sea of heavy styles that shouldn't be overlooked when studying design and fashion. Even the crinoline dress, when paired with exquisite silk gauzes, as shown in Fig. 3 in Plates XXXI and XXXIII (see pp. 270-282), was as captivating as any woman could desire, and the original design of the jacket in the latter figure, featuring a richly embroidered, long-skirted front cut short in the back, fitted perfectly on this type of undergarment. There was a significant refinement in effect and beauty of proportion in many dresses from the sixties, as illustrated in Fig. A, Plate XXXII (see p. 279), with the waist sitting relatively high, and the very full skirt held back by the crinoline secured with cross ties.
CHAPTER I[40]
PREHISTORIC DRESS. FEMALE.
The woman's attire would have been chiefly a shortish skirt or wrap of coarse linen, wool, or leather, gathered in front or folded at one hip; grass cloth may also have been in use in most primitive tribes. Probably the upper part of the body was kept bare, except for many ornaments and necklaces, but a bodice or jacket cut in the same simple form as the male shirt, with a heavy belt or girdle, would have been used, and certainly a large shawl, which could be wrapped over the head and round the figure during inclement hours. Dyed or painted patterns on the cloths might well have been also in use, their chief designs being stripes, circles or dots, zigzag lines, diamonds and plaid squares, rope patterns and plaited patterns. The hair would have been loose, plaited, or coiled[41] on top, held by bone pins or circlets of bronze.
The woman's outfit would typically consist of a short skirt or wrap made from rough linen, wool, or leather, gathered in front or tucked at one hip; grass cloth might also have been used in many early tribes. The upper body was likely mostly bare, except for various ornaments and necklaces, but a bodice or jacket shaped similarly to a man's shirt, along with a heavy belt, would have been worn. A large shawl would certainly have been included, which could be draped over the head and around the body during bad weather. Dyed or painted patterns on the fabrics were probably common, featuring designs like stripes, circles or dots, zigzag lines, diamonds, plaid squares, rope designs, and braided patterns. The hair would have been worn loose, braided, or coiled on top, secured with bone pins or bronze circlets.[41]
PREHISTORIC DRESS. MALE.
We have little description or illustration to certify the actual dress of the early inhabitants of Britain, but we can draw conclusions with pretty certain assurance, from the knowledge of their mode of living. From their attainments in artistic design and handiwork, it is clear they had arrived at a very high state of savage culture before the Roman invasion; and we have only to study the better types of savage life still in progress, to picture how our own primitive race would be likely to dress under the conditions of climate. The thousands of "finds," which accumulate evidence every year, give us a closer acquaintance with their customs and work. The rest we must imagine from our general knowledge of what they had to contend with in climate, forest, cave, and floods.
We don’t have much description or visual evidence to confirm how the early inhabitants of Britain dressed, but we can make pretty safe conclusions based on what we know about their lifestyle. Their skills in artistic design and craftsmanship indicate that they had reached a fairly advanced level of primitive culture before the Roman invasion. By looking at more developed examples of primitive life that still exist today, we can envision how our early ancestors might have dressed in their climate. The thousands of discoveries made each year provide us with more insight into their customs and work. For the rest, we need to use our general knowledge of the challenges they faced with the climate, forests, caves, and floods.
These early people, it is presumed from certain discoveries, had long known the art of coarsely weaving flax and wool, which must soon have been in general use,[42] from its being healthier and cleaner than the garments of skin. And very probably a coarse linen, with simple dyes of red, blue, yellow, and brown, was in use here when the Romans came.
These early people, based on some discoveries, had likely been skilled in weaving flax and wool for a long time, which probably became common because it was healthier and cleaner than skin garments.[42] It's very likely that coarse linen, dyed simply in red, blue, yellow, and brown, was already being used when the Romans arrived.
The head-dress consisted of a cap of fur or wool, probably decorated with a feather, over loose and most likely very unkempt hair falling to the shoulders. The Gauls cut their locks from the back of the head, often tying up the remainder in a tuft on the top; no doubt the hair was sometimes plaited or pinned up with wood, bone, or bronze ornaments. Bone pins, teeth, and boar tusks were carried in the ears, as well as studs of bone or stone in the underlip, and even the cheek may have been so decorated, as it was amongst the Esquimaux. The face and body were painted with red and white ochre and a blue stain. The neck was adorned with strings of teeth, stones, amber, jet, bronze, and probably beads of glass or baked clay coloured. Amulets and tokens, armlets and bracelets were all in use. Also the torque, a twisted rod of gold flattened or curled together at the ends, was a mark of dignity. A wristlet of wood, bone, or leather was worn when the bow and arrows were used.[43] The arms were a spear of flint or bronze and a dagger of the same, a hatchet or heavy club, a mace studded with flint or bronze spikes, and the sling, which would have necessitated a leather wallet to carry the stones; fish spears and snags. Also the bolas for felling cattle seems to have been known; in fact nearly all the usual implements appertaining to savage life were in use.
The headdress consisted of a cap made of fur or wool, probably decorated with a feather, over loose and likely very messy hair that fell to the shoulders. The Gauls cut their hair from the back of the head, often tying up the remaining hair into a tuft on top; no doubt the hair was sometimes braided or pinned up with wood, bone, or bronze ornaments. Bone pins, teeth, and boar tusks were worn in the ears, along with studs of bone or stone in the lower lip, and even the cheeks may have been decorated, similar to customs among the Eskimos. The face and body were painted with red and white ochre and a blue dye. The neck was adorned with strings of teeth, stones, amber, jet, and probably beads made of glass or baked clay. Amulets, tokens, armlets, and bracelets were all worn. Additionally, the torque, which is a twisted rod of gold that was flattened or curled at the ends, was a sign of respect. A wristband made of wood, bone, or leather was used when the bow and arrows were in play.[43] The weapons included a spear made of flint or bronze, a dagger of the same materials, a hatchet or heavy club, a mace studded with flint or bronze spikes, and a sling, which would have required a leather pouch to carry the stones; fish spears and hooks. The bolas for taking down cattle also seemed to be known; in fact, almost all the common tools related to primitive life were in use.

Plate II.
Plate 2.
- (a) Elizabethan Robe in Plush. 1585-1605.
- (b) Elizabethan Robe in Silk Brocade. 1565-85.
- (c) Elizabethan Male Robe in Velvet Brocade. 1580-1615.
- (d) Back-piece of Elizabethan Doublet in Embroidered Linen. 1580-1605.
The first item of male attire was of two skins fastened at the shoulders, and from this we get the early chasuble form (which may be so beautifully treated, even to the present time), girt with a leather thong or strap at the waist. One skin lapped the other, and hardly needed sewing together at the sides, while thus it was easier to throw off; it may also have been tied up between the legs. The fur was worn both inside and out, according to the weather; this large skin wrap would also be worn cross-ways with the right shoulder free, and the simple cloak of various lengths with a hole for the head to pass through was no doubt one of the first discoveries in costume.
The first piece of men's clothing was made from two skins fastened at the shoulders, and from this, we get the early chasuble shape (which can still be beautifully designed today), secured with a leather thong or strap at the waist. One skin overlapped the other and hardly needed to be sewn at the sides, making it easier to take off; it may also have been tied between the legs. The fur could be worn inside or out, depending on the weather; this large skin wrap could also be worn across the body with the right shoulder exposed, and the simple cloak of various lengths with a hole for the head to go through was likely one of the earliest fashion innovations.
A loin cloth or skin may have been worn alone, caught up through the legs and fastened at the back of the waist with[44] a heavy belt and set well down the hips. This would hold a number of personal necessities, in the shape of a wallet and dagger. The legs would be wrapped with skins, tied up or crossed by leather or sinew thongs, or with hemp or grass rope. Skins were probably also used on the feet, gathered and tied above the instep and round the ankle.
A loincloth or skin might have been worn alone, pulled up between the legs and secured at the back of the waist with[44] a heavy belt positioned low on the hips. This would hold several personal items, like a wallet and a dagger. The legs would be wrapped with skins, secured with leather or sinew thongs, or with rope made from hemp or grass. Skins were likely also used on the feet, gathered and tied above the instep and around the ankle.
The enumeration of these items will give a pretty definite idea of how the early race would appear in their more or less attired form. In fighting, they cleared for action (as it were) and discarded all clothing, their only protection being a shield of wicker or wood covered with leather; it may have been studded with bronze plates or painted with grotesque characters, as were their own bodies, in true savage style, to strike fear into their enemies; it is even possible feather decorations formed part of their "get up."
The list of these items will give a clear idea of how the early people would look in various clothing styles. When it came to fighting, they stripped down and wore no clothes, their only protection being a shield made of wicker or wood covered with leather; it might have been decorated with bronze plates or painted with strange designs, just like their bodies, in a truly wild style, to scare their enemies; it’s even possible that feather decorations were part of their outfit.
CHAPTER II[45]
THE DEVELOPMENT OF COSTUME TO THE TENTH CENTURY. FEMALE.
The female head-dress consisted chiefly of flowing hair banded with a circlet of various shapes, but a development of braiding plaits is found very early, and the hair was probably arranged so before the Roman era. These plaits were generally brought over the shoulder to the front, the hair being parted in the centre, thus making an oval forehead. Various caps began to show originality, and jewels were set in the centre of the forehead on the little crown-like hat, which must have been most becoming. Squares of coloured stuffs were draped over the head and shoulders, sometimes upon white linen squares, and many ladies began to bind the face and head, shutting out the hair, in the 8th century. The kerchief draping is very important to[46] study, because it was the general mode amongst the people.
The female headpiece mainly featured flowing hair styled with a circlet of different shapes, but early on, braiding became popular, and the hair was likely arranged this way before the Roman era. The braids were typically draped over the shoulder to the front, with the hair parted in the center, creating an oval forehead. Various caps showed unique designs, and jewels were set in the middle of the forehead on a small, crown-like hat, which must have looked very attractive. Squares of colorful fabrics were draped over the head and shoulders, sometimes on white linen squares, and many women started to cover their faces and heads, hiding their hair, in the 8th century. The way kerchiefs were draped is crucial to[46] study since it was the common style among the people.
Heavy collars of ornament and strings of beads, hanging even to the waist, are noticeable features of these centuries, also large ear-rings.
Heavy decorative collars and strings of beads that hang down to the waist are common sights from these centuries, along with large earrings.
A full cloak, with a large clasp or brooch, opened in front, or was turned to free one shoulder; there was also a long "drape" thrown round over the opposite shoulder or brought picturesquely over the head.
A full cloak, with a large clasp or brooch, opened in the front or was adjusted to free one shoulder; there was also a long "drape" thrown over the opposite shoulder or stylishly arranged over the head.
The ecclesiastical form of cloak as described in the male attire was also formed about the 6th century; its graceful line was frequently bordered completely with a band of ornament, and it was clasped just across the breasts.
The church-style cloak described in men's clothing was also created around the 6th century; its elegant shape was often fully trimmed with an ornamental band, and it was fastened right across the chest.
The complete circular cloak, with a hole for the head, is seen very early, decorated with a pinked edge, which may also be noted on some of the short dresses of the middle classes. Aprons are no doubt of the earliest origin. A loose tunic falling to the hips was girded rather high up the body, as in the classic dress, and bands passing both outside or crossing between the breasts and going over the shoulder came from the same source; these were with, or without, short sleeves to the elbow. A long[48] loose robe was the chief attire to the 6th century, belted rather high in the waist, and caught up with a girdle at the hips; these girdles gave a great interest to the early centuries, with the art of arranging the fullness of skirt into its hold.
The complete circular cloak, with a hole for the head, appears very early, decorated with a pinked edge, which can also be seen on some of the short dresses of the middle classes. Aprons undoubtedly have ancient origins. A loose tunic reaching the hips was commonly worn, cinched rather high on the body, similar to classic styles, with bands that either wrapped around outside or crossed between the breasts and went over the shoulder; these could have short sleeves or no sleeves at all, extending to the elbow. A long[48] loose robe was the main outfit of the 6th century, belted high at the waist and gathered at the hips with a girdle; these girdles added significant interest during the early centuries, showcasing the skill of arranging the fullness of the skirt.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
From the 6th century the dress became closer fitting, and a short bodice is seen; the neck was cut very low, either square or round in shape, and this style had short tight sleeves or tight sleeves to the wrist. The later tunic of the 9th century marked the beginning of the slit-open upper sleeve, and a greater length of the neck opening, which came to be fastened down the front to the waist.
From the 6th century, clothing became more fitted, and a short bodice appeared; the neckline was cut very low, either square or round, and this style had short, tight sleeves or sleeves that fit tightly to the wrist. The later tunic of the 9th century marked the start of the slit-open upper sleeve and a larger neck opening, which was fastened down the front to the waist.
The early skirts (to the 6th century) were hung from the hips, and were often attached to a heavy girdle band, the fullness was gathered mostly at the back and front; other skirts hung from a higher belt and were again caught up in the girdle. A V-shaped neck setting was worn by the Franks, from which probably came the shaped front piece that will interest us in the 13th century. The shoes were similar to the male shapes described later, and the same mode of binding the stockings was sometimes imitated.[49]
The early skirts (up to the 6th century) were worn at the hips and often attached to a heavy girdle. The fullness was mostly gathered at the back and front; other skirts were worn from a higher belt and also gathered in the girdle. The Franks wore a V-shaped neckline, which likely influenced the shaped front piece that we'll look at in the 13th century. The shoes were similar to the men's styles described later, and the same method of tying the stockings was sometimes copied.[49]
THE DEVELOPMENT OF COSTUME TO THE TENTH CENTURY. MALE.
In taking the long period from the Roman occupation to the 10th century, we can discover a real development of style in costume, as with the system of vassalage a distinction of class arose. No doubt the Romans introduced a finer tuition of weaving, needlecraft, decoration, and dyeing; and later the various peoples coming from the Continent, when settled under Alfred in the 9th century, produced a solid style of barbaric splendour.
In looking at the long stretch from the Roman occupation to the 10th century, we can see a genuine evolution in clothing styles, as the system of vassalage led to class distinctions. The Romans certainly brought in more advanced techniques for weaving, needlework, decoration, and dyeing; later on, the different groups arriving from the Continent and settling under Alfred in the 9th century created a strong style of barbaric elegance.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The male hair dressing, from the rugged mass of hair, soon became well combed and trimmed square across the neck: ear-rings may still have been in use by some nobles till the 11th century, and chaplets were worn upon the hair. The Saxon beard was divided into two points. Small round tight caps of wool, fur, or velvet, and rush or straw hats of a definite shape were in use to the 10th century. Tight caps, with lappets tied under the chin, and hoods appear on the short capes about the 8th century, or probably earlier. The garment was of the simplest form, cut[52] like a plain square loose shirt to the middle of the thigh, and this was put on over the head. The opening to pass the head through was the first part to receive a band of decoration. The sides were sometimes opened to the hips and the front caught between the legs and held at the waist. A garment opened down the front, and another wrapped across to either shoulder is also seen. A belt girt the waist, and the tunic was pulled loosely over it. This also carried the essential requirements in the shape of a pouch, dagger, knife, comb, sword, &c. The neck was ornamented with chains of bronze, gold, beads, and charms, and up to the 8th century a bronze ornamental armlet was worn, besides a wristlet.
The men's hairstyles, once a wild mess of hair, soon became well-groomed and neatly trimmed at the neck. Ear-rings were still worn by some nobles until the 11th century, and chaplets adorned the hair. The Saxon beard was styled into two points. Small, fitted caps made from wool, fur, or velvet, as well as straw or rush hats with specific shapes, were used until the 10th century. Tight caps with flaps tied under the chin and hoods appeared on short capes around the 8th century, or possibly even earlier. The garment was very simple, cut like a plain, loose shirt that reached the middle of the thigh, and it was pulled over the head. The opening for the head was the first part to get a decorative band. Sometimes the sides were opened up to the hips, and the front was gathered between the legs and secured at the waist. There were garments that opened in the front and others that wrapped across to either shoulder. A belt cinched the waist, and the tunic hung loosely over it. This also held essential items like a pouch, dagger, knife, comb, sword, etc. The neck was decorated with chains made of bronze, gold, beads, and charms, and until the 8th century, a bronze ornamental armlet and a wristlet were worn as well.
The men of the ruling class from the 8th century were clothed in a long garment of simple shape, falling to the ankle, richly bordered at the hem and neck. This generally had long tight sleeves, and often over this a shorter tunic, reaching just below the knee, sometimes sleeveless, or with rather full sleeves tightening to the wrist.
The men from the ruling class in the 8th century wore long, simple garments that reached their ankles and had rich borders at the hem and neck. These usually featured long, tight sleeves, and often a shorter tunic was worn over it, hitting just below the knee. This tunic could be sleeveless or have loose sleeves that tightened at the wrist.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
A plain square chasuble shape was in fashion from the 8th century, reaching to[54] the bottom of the calf of the leg, and richer materials began to be used; no belt was passed round this, as it was allowed to fall straight.
A simple square chasuble style was in vogue from the 8th century, extending to[54] the bottom of the calf, and more luxurious fabrics started to be used; no belt was worn with this, as it was intended to hang straight.
Loose breeches were worn from very early times, and a loose trouser to the ankle, being tied there or bound crosswise from the boot sometimes right up the thigh. The same binding was done even with the bare legs and later hose: close-fitting short breeches and cloth hose became a feature in the 10th century, and with the latter an ornamental knee-piece or garter below the knee sometimes finished the strappings.
Loose pants have been in style since ancient times, often reaching the ankle and tied or wrapped around the leg, sometimes all the way up the thigh. The same type of binding was also used with bare legs and later with stockings. Fitted short pants and cloth stockings became popular in the 10th century, and these often included decorative knee pieces or garters below the knee to complete the look.
The cloak was the "grand garment," heavily banded with ornament and fastened with a large clasp on one shoulder, or at the centre of the breast. Long circular cloaks of varying lengths, put on over the head, were much favoured, and when caught up at the sides on either shoulder gave a fine draped effect.
The cloak was the "grand garment," richly decorated with embellishments and secured with a large clasp on one shoulder or at the center of the chest. Long circular cloaks of different lengths, worn over the head, were very popular, and when gathered at the sides on either shoulder, they created a beautiful draped effect.
Another cloak of ecclesiastical character, sloping in a curve from the neck and not meeting in front, is seen on many notable figures from the early 8th century, large clasps bridging the width low down on the chest.
Another ecclesiastical cloak, draping in a curve from the neck and not connecting in front, can be seen on many prominent figures from the early 8th century, with large clasps crossing the width low on the chest.

Plate III.—(a) Elizabethan Jump (or Jacket). About 1600. (b) Portrait of a Lady in Embroidered Costume. Between 1620 and 1640.
Plate III.—(a) Elizabethan Jump (or Jacket). About 1600. (b) Portrait of a Lady in Embroidered Costume. Between 1620 and 1640.

Fig. 5.—Types of Shoes.
British, Roman, Norman to 13th century.
Fig. 5.—Shoe Types.
British, Roman, Norman up to the 13th century.
No doubt the sandal of various forms was much used for footwear through this period, also a simple low shoe which was held on by the leg-strappings, as, about the 8th century, shoes are seen with loops at the upper edge, these being attachments[56] for the binding, and this was no doubt a method from the prehistoric times.
No doubt sandals of different styles were widely used for footwear during this time, along with a basic low shoe that was secured by leg straps. By the 8th century, shoes were made with loops at the top edge, which served as attachments for the bindings. This method likely dates back to prehistoric times.[56]
There was also a soft boot reaching to the calf, laced up the front; and, after the 8th century, a rather pointed shoe, open down the instep, laced, tied, or gathered into a buckle about the ankle.
There was also a soft boot that reached the calf, laced up the front; and, after the 8th century, a pointed shoe that was open down the instep, laced, tied, or secured with a buckle around the ankle.
CHAPTER III[57]
TENTH TO THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY. FEMALE.
The head-dress of women now began to show a preference to confine the hair with nets and to close in the face, which continued till the 15th century. The circlet and long plait or plaits and the flowing hair remained till the 14th century. In the 12th century we discover the hair gathered in nets at either side of the head, covering the ears. A low-crowned hat was bound over with a band of lawn or fine material passing underneath the chin, otherwise the plaits were looped up under a circlet which was also worn with the flowing hair.
The headwear of women started to prefer styles that held the hair back with nets and framed the face, which lasted until the 15th century. The circlet and long braid or braids, along with flowing hair, remained popular until the 14th century. In the 12th century, we see hair gathered in nets on either side of the head, covering the ears. A low-crowned hat was secured with a band of lawn or fine material that went under the chin, while the braids were often looped up under a circlet that was also combined with flowing hair.
A square effect was aimed at in the 13th century with tight side-plaits bound into a shape or netted hair was strapped to the head as in Fig. 11 (see p. 65). A fall of[58] fine material softened the hard effect, and many ladies of quality bound the face, neck, and head in the wimple of fine linen, sometimes gathering this to the same quaint shape of the netted hair. I give a variety of these settings on page 65. A kerchief of linen coming round the neck was brought up tightly round the face and festooned on the top of the head, while another piece was pinned close to the brows and fell loosely to the shoulders, being often held on by a circlet as well.
A square look was the goal in the 13th century, with tight side braids styled into a shape or netted hair secured to the head as shown in Fig. 11 (see p. 65). A layer of[58] fine fabric softened the rigid appearance, and many women of quality wrapped their face, neck, and head in a wimple made of fine linen, sometimes shaping it to match the unique style of the netted hair. I provide a variety of these styles on page 65. A linen kerchief that wrapped around the neck was pulled tightly around the face and draped on top of the head, while another piece was pinned close to the forehead and hung loosely to the shoulders, often secured by a circlet as well.
This character was maintained till the early 14th century, when a style of high peaked hats came into evidence, one shape of which became the most imposing feature of historic costume in the 15th century. It was still but a simple form in the middle of the 14th century, for another shape first gained predominance. Early in this century also may be noted a curious shape like the cap of liberty, usually with a long tail at the back as drawn on page 59. This carried design to the eccentric forms of the pig-tailed hood, and then the rival of the high peaked hat took its place towards the end of the 14th century—a cushioned head-dress, which rose and divided in a hornlike structure. It[62] started as in Fig. 25, and I have illustrated its progress; the veil draping was a great feature, giving plenty of scope for individual fancy. It was, as a rule, richly decorated with gold and jewels, and the hair was completely enclosed in a gold net and a tight-fitting cap to hold this erection. Large drop ear-rings were much worn, and a fine chain of gems encircled the neck or fell to the breast.
This style lasted until the early 14th century, when high-peaked hats became popular. One particular shape became the most striking feature of historical costumes in the 15th century. In the middle of the 14th century, it was still a simple design, as another shape started to dominate. Also notable this century is a curious shape resembling a liberty cap, usually with a long tail at the back, as illustrated on page 59. This led to the quirky designs of pig-tailed hoods, and then, toward the end of the 14th century, a rival to the high-peaked hat emerged—a cushioned headpiece that rose and split into a horn-like structure. It[62] started as shown in Fig. 25, and I have illustrated its evolution; the veil draping was a major feature, allowing for plenty of personal creativity. Typically, it was richly adorned with gold and jewels, and the hair was fully enclosed in a gold net with a tight-fitting cap to secure this style. Large drop earrings were commonly worn, and a beautiful chain of gems encircled the neck or draped down to the chest.

Plate IV.—(c) Youth's Jacket of Linen Embroidered in Worsted. 1635-65. Pattern, see p. 299. (d) Linen Male Jacket Embroidered with Gold and Silk. 1600-40.
Plate IV.—(c) Youth's Linen Jacket Embroidered with Worsted. 1635-65. For the pattern, see p. 299. (d) Linen Men's Jacket Embroidered with Gold and Silk. 1600-40.

Fig. 6.—Tenth to thirteenth century.
Fig. 6.—10th to 13th century.

Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.

Fig. 8.—Twelfth to fourteenth century.
Fig. 8.—12th to 14th century.
In the 10th century a long close-fitting robe was in fashion, sometimes with a deep V-shaped neck opening, though usually the neck was cut to a round form. Some sleeves were tighter with a small cuff, but usually the outer garment had a falling sleeve with a square or round end showing the tight undersleeve. The outer sleeve varied much in length, from the elbow or hand dropping even to the ground; it was narrow and widened through the 14th century, when its edge was cut into various patterns as in Fig. 18 (see p. 79). In the 13th century we notice a long sleeve opened at the elbow for the under sleeve to come through, which beautiful style continued to the middle of the 17th century.
In the 10th century, a long, fitted robe was popular, sometimes featuring a deep V-shaped neck opening, though it was more commonly round. Some sleeves were snug with a small cuff, but typically, the outer garment had a falling sleeve with either a square or round end that revealed the tight undersleeve. The length of the outer sleeve varied greatly, ranging from elbow length to even dragging on the ground; it was narrow and began to widen through the 14th century, when its edge was cut into various patterns as shown in Fig. 18 (see p. 79). By the 13th century, we see long sleeves with openings at the elbow for the undersleeve to come through, a stylish design that continued until the middle of the 17th century.

Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.

Fig. 10.—Fourteenth century, 1st half.
Fig. 10.—14th century, 1st half.

Fig. 11.—Fourteenth century, 2nd half.
Fig. 11.—14th century, second half.
With the 10th century came the first corselet from the waist to the hip, clasping[66] a loose tunic with an under-dress taking a long pointed train. The manner of tucking the tunic under the corselet when it was worn over it, and so creating festoons, is worthy of notice as interesting in arrangement and design.
With the 10th century, the first corselet appeared, extending from the waist to the hip, clasping[66] a loose tunic paired with an under-dress that had a long pointed train. The way the tunic was tucked under the corselet when worn over it, creating festive drapes, is noteworthy for its interesting arrangement and design.
The 13th century parti-coloured and striped dresses foreshadowed the heraldic fashion, which must be studied for its proportion and treatment of decorative colour-values in counterchange to get the true value of its noble effects.
The 13th century's two-tone and striped dresses hinted at the heraldic style, which should be examined for its balance and approach to decorative color values in contrast to truly appreciate its noble effects.
A great feature now appears in the chasuble-shaped front or setting to a closely cut jacket. This ultimately becomes the decorative stomacher through the later periods, and it is very interesting to note its development.
A great feature now shows up in the chasuble-shaped front or design of a closely tailored jacket. This eventually evolves into the decorative stomacher in later styles, and it's really interesting to see how it develops.
In the 13th century this jacket was a fur construction of a long simple form opened at the sides to the hips for the sleeves to come through; it had a straight hem or was rounded at the front points, and a chasuble form of it was treated as in Fig. 13 or in conjunction with a short cape; it was chiefly a decoration of ermine. It grew into a complete jacket, and in the 14th century it was heavily ornamented with gems; and the simple front, from[68] being a feature outside the jacket, was later often enclosed at the sides. The jacket itself is beautiful in form and proportion, and the curved band of design over the hips makes a nice foil to the curved front. This pattern is plainly derived from the effect of the rich girdle that was at first seen through the side openings and few jackets are without it, the usual shaping of the neck with most of these was square.
In the 13th century, this jacket was made of fur and had a long, simple shape with openings at the sides up to the hips for the sleeves to come through. It featured either a straight hem or rounded front points, and a chasuble version of it is shown in Fig. 13, sometimes paired with a short cape; it was primarily decorated with ermine. It evolved into a full jacket, and by the 14th century, it was heavily adorned with gems. The simple front, which was originally an external feature, later became enclosed at the sides. The jacket itself has a beautiful form and proportion, with a curved design over the hips that contrasts nicely with the curved front. This pattern clearly comes from the rich girdle that was initially visible through the side openings, and few jackets lack it; most of these jackets typically had a square neck shaping.

Fig. 12.—Nos. 1 to 7, 14th century. Nos. 8 and 9, 15th century.
Fig. 12.—Numbers 1 to 7 are from the 14th century. Numbers 8 and 9 are from the 15th century.
In the first quarter of the 14th century the setting of the neck was of a round shape, and after 1350 a raised or curved form is favoured. Later still, and with the hornlike head-dress, a very deep V shape, open almost to the belt was the mode, often being filled in with velvet. At the same time some began to take up the fashions of a very high collar and a round-shaped body and sleeves, as in Fig. 24 (see p. 89), with which a wide pointed belt is seen. Some robes were opened in front up to the height of the girdle, though many dresses were worn without girdles after the 12th century. Decorated pockets are sometimes seen in the later period, and an interesting hand-covering or falling cuff came with them.
In the early 14th century, the neckline was round, but after 1350, a raised or curved style became popular. Later on, with the horn-like headpiece, a very deep V shape, open almost to the belt, was in fashion, often filled in with velvet. At the same time, some people started adopting a style with a very high collar and a rounded body and sleeves, as shown in Fig. 24 (see p. 89), paired with a wide pointed belt. Some robes were opened in front up to the height of the belt, although many dresses were worn without belts after the 12th century. Decorated pockets occasionally appeared in this later period, along with an interesting hand-covering or falling cuff.

Fig. 13.—Nos. 1 to 3, 14th century. Nos. 4 to 9, 15th century.
Fig. 13.—Items 1 to 3 are from the 14th century. Items 4 to 9 are from the 15th century.
[70]The cloak as described in the 10th century still continued till the 12th, as well as the light wrap which may almost be placed with any period, though mostly a feature of the more classic styles.
[70]The cloak mentioned from the 10th century remained in fashion until the 12th century, along with the lightweight wrap that can fit into almost any era, although it's mainly associated with the more classic styles.
Skirts and underskirts were worn with trains. They were mostly banded with wide borders of ornament up to the 13th century, the fullness being often gathered to the back and front.
Skirts and underskirts were worn with trains. They were mostly bordered with wide decorative bands up to the 13th century, with the fullness often gathered at the back and front.
The chasuble-shaped overdress was worn to the middle of the 14th century, sleeveless, and, laced or sewn tight to the figure from the arm to the hip, or completely down the sides, generally reached just below the knee.
The chasuble-shaped overdress was worn until the middle of the 14th century, sleeveless, and laced or sewn tight to the body from the arm to the hip, or all the way down the sides, typically reaching just below the knee.
The shoes were of much the same character as those of the male examples illustrated, though they hardly reached the same extravagance in length, owing, no doubt, to the feet of woman being hampered by her skirt; but I suspect they even braved high wooden clogs, as we know they did the tall chopins of the 16th century, to heighten their stature.
The shoes were quite similar to those worn by men, although they didn't quite reach the same extreme lengths, likely because women's feet were restricted by their skirts. However, I suspect they even ventured into wearing high wooden clogs, just like they did with the tall chopins of the 16th century, to enhance their height.

Plate V.
Plate V.
- (a) Jerkin. Period James I.
- (b) Lady's Bodice of Slashed and Vandyked Satin. 1635-50. Pattern measurements, see p. 293.
- (c) Jerkin of Embroidered Linen. 1630-60.
- (d) Jerkin of Embroidered Linen. 1580-1635.
[71] TENTH TO THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY. MALE.
From the 10th to the 15th century, we find costume developing rapidly into elaborate and interesting designs. Close relations with the Continent brought new ideas, and rich velvets and brocades interwoven with gold enhanced the gorgeousness of attire, while the introduction of heraldic design brought in a very picturesque element. Hats and head-dresses began to become important features, enlarging to eccentric shapes and proportions, only equalled in the extravagant part of the 18th century.
From the 10th to the 15th century, costumes evolved quickly into elaborate and intriguing designs. Close ties with the Continent introduced new ideas, and luxurious velvets and brocades woven with gold added to the splendor of clothing, while the use of heraldic designs introduced a striking visual element. Hats and headpieces became significant features, growing into eccentric shapes and sizes, rivaled only by the extravagance of the 18th century.
It may be noted that feminine fashion, as it assumes new characters and proportions, affects the style of the male clothes in the same way, as, when a high or pointed head-dress comes in, the male hat also increases its size; the same with curved or angular designs, full or tight sleeves.
It’s important to recognize that as women's fashion evolves with new styles and shapes, it also influences men’s clothing in the same way. For example, when a tall or pointed headpiece becomes popular, men’s hats also get bigger; the same goes for curved or sharp designs, and whether sleeves are loose or fitted.
The hair was worn long and rather squared in shape at the back till the end of the 15th century. A tendency to shut in the face by close hoods tied under the chin is remarked, and this forms a strong[72] feature of the 13th and 14th centuries. Ear-rings were seldom worn after the 10th century; but the neck was generally adorned with heavy chain decorations.
The hair was worn long and somewhat squared off at the back until the end of the 15th century. There was a trend to cover the face with close-fitting hoods tied under the chin, which became a defining feature of the 13th and 14th centuries. Earrings were rarely worn after the 10th century, but the neck was usually decorated with heavy chain necklaces.
Beards assumed a pointed shape in accordance with this development of fashion, and double-pointed beards were revived between 1380 and 1386. Hats of straw with mushroom brims and round tops came into vogue in the 11th century, covered with coloured materials and finished with a spike or button at the top, and the crowns of these took a pointed shape in the 14th century. The usual cap with folded brim had a loose crown, and we find this began to lengthen and fall over to one side in the 11th century, and continued to elongate till, in the 15th century, it often dropped to the knee in a long thin point. In the 14th century it took a fullness of loose folds, with serrated or foliated edges falling to the shoulder as in Fig. 15 (see p. 73). A close helmet-shaped cap is seen in the 12th century, with a falling point from the crown, and the 13th century brought in the higher crowned hat, with a long peaked front, turned up at the back. Feathers were worn at the front, back, or side of hats, and sometimes on the[76] front of the hoods; these increased their dimensions in height and peak, till the straight-up high hat, which was often brimless, came in the 15th century. The early hood or cowl soon began to vary its design, for in the 13th century it was often a part of, or attached to, a chasuble shape falling back and front, or with the long front, stopping at a short cape length behind. A note of interest in the 14th century appears, where the forehead part of the hood is turned up, showing a coloured lining, and at times the fashionable serrated edge surrounding the face is seen.
Beards became pointed in line with the fashion trends, and double-pointed beards made a comeback between 1380 and 1386. Straw hats with wide brims and round tops gained popularity in the 11th century, often covered with colorful fabrics and topped with a spike or button, and their crowns took on a pointed shape in the 14th century. The typical cap with a folded brim had a loose crown that began to lengthen and tilt to one side in the 11th century, continuing to elongate until, by the 15th century, it sometimes reached down to the knee in a long thin point. In the 14th century, it featured loose folds with jagged or leaf-like edges hanging down to the shoulder, as shown in Fig. 15 (see p. 73). A fitted helmet-shaped cap appeared in the 12th century with a drooping point from the crown, and the 13th century introduced a taller hat with a long peaked front that was turned up at the back. Feathers were worn at the front, back, or side of hats, and sometimes on the[76] front of hoods; these added height and flair until the straight-up high hats, which were often brimless, became fashionable in the 15th century. The early hood or cowl soon changed in style, as in the 13th century it was frequently attached to or part of a chasuble design that fell both front and back, or had a long front that stopped at a short cape length behind. An interesting detail in the 14th century was the turned-up forehead part of the hood that revealed a colored lining, and sometimes featured the trendy jagged edge framing the face.

Fig. 14.
Fig. 14.

Fig. 15.—Fourteenth century.
Fig. 15.—14th century.

Plate VI.
Plate 6.
- (a) Collar and Cuffs set with Lace. 1600-30.
- (b) Embroidered Leather Jerkin. 1620-40.
- (c) Top of Stocking. Embroidered Linen. 1625-50.

Fig. 16.—Twelfth to thirteenth century.
Fig. 16.—12th to 13th century.
The chasuble-shaped garment was a feature often worn over the coat until the end of the 15th century, and was generally worn long with the elongated fashion of the 14th century, and short with the shorter tunics of the 15th century. They are found very wide in the 14th century, and so fall well down over the shoulder, where they are often laced a short distance up, creating an interesting feature. Cloaks were not so much in favour with the heavier cowl and cape, but they were used, fastened by brooches to either shoulder rather at the back, after the 12th century.
The chasuble-shaped garment was commonly worn over the coat until the end of the 15th century. It was typically worn long in the style of the 14th century and shorter with the tunics of the 15th century. In the 14th century, they were quite wide and draped well over the shoulder, often laced a short distance up, creating an interesting detail. Cloaks weren't as popular due to the heavier cowl and cape, but they were still used, fastened by brooches to either shoulder, typically towards the back, after the 12th century.

Fig. 17.—Fourteenth century.
Fig. 17.—14th century.
A very tight-fitting suit called Justacorps[78] came into use from the 12th century, and developed a padded round-shaped body towards the end of the 14th century; the closely-cut body was buttoned up to the throat, or was set with a high collar for the first time. The tights came over it, sometimes rather high up the waist, being laced to it. A long tunic was chiefly favoured during the 10th and 11th centuries with short or long cuffless sleeves, and a full bell-shaped falling sleeve showed a close-fitting under one.
A very snug suit called the Justacorps[78] was introduced in the 12th century and developed a padded round-shaped body by the late 14th century; the fitted body was buttoned up to the throat or featured a high collar for the first time. The tights extended over it, sometimes coming up quite high on the waist, and were laced to it. A long tunic was mainly popular during the 10th and 11th centuries, with either short or long cuffless sleeves, and a full bell-shaped sleeve showed a close-fitting one underneath.
These tunics were chiefly open at the neck as in the earlier times, though a slight difference to be noted is a V-shaped opening in the 14th century, which is developed in the 15th century; they were also split up the sides, even to the hips. Some were very full in shape, and were gathered to either side as in the illustration; others had the body closely fitted and full only in the skirt, but as a rule one finds this latter shape only reaches just below the knee. They were often tucked into the belt in front, showing a rich underskirt.
These tunics were mostly open at the neck like in earlier times, but a small change to note is a V-shaped opening that appeared in the 14th century and developed further in the 15th century; they were also split up the sides, reaching the hips. Some had a very roomy shape and were gathered to either side as shown in the illustration; others fit closely at the body and were only loose in the skirt, but usually this latter style only reached just below the knee. They were often tucked into the belt in front, showcasing a rich underskirt.

Fig. 18.—Fourteenth century.
Fig. 18.—14th century.
Tights to the waist were worn with both long and short tunics, and retained the crossed binding up the legs to the 13th century, in the various designs of page 53. Parti-coloured tights came in with the 14th century, carrying out the heraldic character of dress, and this may be found till about 1530. A sandal shoe was much worn up to the 12th century, with strappings to various heights up the leg, this even over the short top-boots, but the usual shoe opened down the front of the instep to the toe, which was rather pointed in shape, and it was curved or square at the ankle. The illustration gives a good variety of the prevalent forms. The stocking-boot is also another characteristic of this earlier time, as well as the commoners' woollen gaiters, worn as in Fig. 30, on the seated figure, which were in use to the middle of the 16th century.
Tights that reached the waist were worn with both long and short tunics and had the cross-binding up the legs until the 13th century, as shown in the various designs of page 53. Parti-coloured tights emerged in the 14th century, reflecting the heraldic style of clothing, and this trend continued until about 1530. Sandal shoes were commonly worn up until the 12th century, featuring straps that varied in height up the leg, even over short top-boots. However, the typical shoe opened at the front of the instep to the toe, which was pointed and curved or square at the ankle. The illustration shows a good variety of the common styles. The stocking-boot is also a notable feature of this earlier period, as well as the woollen gaiters worn by commoners, as seen in Fig. 30, on the seated figure, which were in use until the middle of the 16th century.

Fig. 19.—Twelfth and thirteenth centuries.
Fig. 19.—12th and 13th centuries.
In the illustrations which show no shoe on the tights, it will be understood that a sole of leather was sewn on to the under part of the foot. This practice is even seen[82] to-day on the Continent, where the clog is mostly in use. A soft boot, reaching to the calf, was worn till the 15th century, with the top folded or trimmed with fur, the latter being generally laced down the front, even to the instep: the shape of these only varied in the length of the pointed toes as the style developed.
In the illustrations that show no shoe on the tights, it should be understood that a leather sole was stitched onto the bottom of the foot. This practice can still be seen[82] today on the Continent, where clogs are mostly used. A soft boot that reaches the calf was worn until the 15th century, with the top either folded over or trimmed with fur, which was typically laced down the front, all the way to the instep: the only variation in shape was the length of the pointed toes as styles evolved.
The long-pointed shoes began to increase all through the 13th century, and in the 14th century they reached their greatest length, when the points were often tied up to a garter just below the knee. Wooden clogs were much used, and were often considerably raised. Iron circular supports were also in use at the end of this time; these were the foretaste of the eccentric chopins of the 16th century, which were more favoured on the Continent than here. The pointed toes also were made to curl outwards, giving a splay-footed effect, late in the 14th century.
The long, pointed shoes started to become popular throughout the 13th century, and by the 14th century, they reached their longest length, with the points often tied up to a garter just below the knee. Wooden clogs were widely used and were often quite elevated. Iron circular supports were also in use by this time; these were a preview of the quirky chopins of the 16th century, which were more popular on the Continent than here. The pointed toes were also designed to curl outward, creating a splay-footed look, towards the end of the 14th century.

Fig. 20.—Fourteenth and fifteenth centuries.
Fig. 20.—1400s.
CHAPTER IV[84]
FIFTEENTH CENTURY. FEMALE.
We have now arrived at the height of eccentric fashion in mediæval head-dress. The hornlike creations, studded with jewels, and peaks of wondrous height, both draped with fine muslins and often completely shutting away the hair from sight, had a supporting cap which mostly came over ears and cheeks, and a clutch is seen on the forehead, at times concealed by a jewel. The hair was generally allowed to fall loose under the back drape, or a long plait is sometimes seen at the back with the first-named head-dress. The back drape setting from the brow down the back was well conceived to balance the high spire, but it seems to have been discarded during the reign of Edward V, and light veil falls were worn which often came half over the face. In Henry VII's time the extreme[88] fashion came in the shape of a closely-fitting curved cap, with a fall of material over the back. The ermine-trimmed jacket was still in favour to the middle of the last-named reign, when it was worn low down over the hips.
We have now reached the peak of eccentric fashion in medieval headwear. The horn-like designs, adorned with jewels, and towering peaks, both draped in fine muslins and often completely hiding the hair, featured a supporting cap that mainly covered the ears and cheeks, with a clasp sometimes seen on the forehead, occasionally hidden by a jewel. The hair was usually allowed to hang loose under the back drape, or a long braid was sometimes seen at the back with the earlier mentioned headpiece. The back drape, flowing from the brow down the back, was well-designed to balance the high spire, but it seems to have fallen out of fashion during Edward V's reign, giving way to lightweight veils that often fell halfway over the face. In Henry VII's time, the extreme[88] fashion took the form of a snug, curved cap, with fabric cascading over the back. The ermine-trimmed jacket remained popular until the middle of Henry VII's reign, worn low over the hips.

Fig. 21.—Fifteenth century, 1st half.
Fig. 21.—15th century, early.

Fig. 22.—Middle of fifteenth century to sixteenth century.
Fig. 22.—Mid-fifteenth century to sixteenth century.

Plate VII.
Plate 7.

Fig. 23.—Fifteenth century, 1st half.
Fig. 23.—15th century, first half.
The chief dress of this period had a V-shaped collar-front meeting at the waist, mostly made in black material or fur. It was wide on the shoulder, and seems to have been stiffened to set out; the V shape was generally filled in with velvet, and a very wide band encircled the waist; a girdle is occasionally noted. The keys' pocket and other requisites were generally carried on the underskirt during these times. The skirt was full and gathered to the back in a train, the gathers often running into the bodice; a very wide border is prevalent, even to the middle of the thigh. Tight sleeves are usual, and hanging sleeves were worn, mostly set in a very short sleeve, which assume a puff-shape in Henry VII's reign; long cuffs, almost covering the hand, are seen on many sleeves.
The main outfit of this period featured a V-shaped collar that met at the waist, primarily made of black fabric or fur. The shoulders were broad, and it appears the design was stiffened for structure; the V shape was typically filled with velvet, and a wide band wrapped around the waist, sometimes accompanied by a girdle. Keys and other necessities were usually carried on the underskirt during this time. The skirt was full and gathered at the back into a train, with gathers often extending into the bodice; a very wide border was common, reaching up to the middle of the thigh. Tight sleeves were standard, and hanging sleeves were worn, typically attached to a very short sleeve that took on a puff shape during Henry VII's reign; long cuffs that nearly covered the hands were seen on many sleeves.

Fig. 24.—Fifteenth century, 2nd half.
Fig. 24.—15th century, 2nd half.

Fig. 25.—Fifteenth century, 2nd half.
Fig. 25.—15th century, 2nd half.

Plate VIII.—(a) (b) (c) Three Suits. Period Charles II.
Plate VIII.—(a) (b) (c) Three Suits. Charles II Era.

Fig. 26.—End of fifteenth century.
Fig. 26.—Late 1500s.
Modes of opening the skirt up to the hips occasionally showed themselves, and even the sides to the hips are seen laced. In the earlier dress, about 1485, the neck[92] setting of dress became very square, and was filled with fine-drawn lawn. The square shape rises in a curved centre before the end of this period, and a close-fitting robe was worn with a girdle, often opened up the sides. The short upper sleeve and full outer sleeve so much in vogue gave place to a divided upper and lower sleeve, laced or tied with ribbon, with puffs of lawn pulled through the openings at shoulder and elbow, and down the back of the forearm. Slashes are now seen in most sleeves, and an Italianesque character pervaded the fashion.
Modes of opening the skirt up to the hips occasionally appeared, and even the sides of the hips were often laced. In earlier dresses around 1485, the neckline setting became very square and was filled with fine-drawn lawn. The square shape rose in a curved center before the end of this period, and a close-fitting gown was worn with a belt, often opened at the sides. The short upper sleeve and full outer sleeve that were so popular were replaced by a divided upper and lower sleeve, laced or tied with ribbon, featuring puffs of lawn pulled through the openings at the shoulder and elbow, and down the back of the forearm. Slashes became common in most sleeves, and an Italian-inspired style influenced the fashion.
High, soft boots and shoes of a similar shape to the male description were worn, and changed when the square-toe shoes came in.
High, soft boots and shoes that were similar in style to those described for men were worn, and they were switched out when square-toe shoes became popular.
Through this period there are many interesting details of costume to study, while gilt tags, finishing laces, and ribbons are to be remarked from this period.
Through this time, there are many interesting details of clothing to explore, and gilt tags, finishing laces, and ribbons can be noted from this era.
FIFTEENTH CENTURY. MALE.

Fig. 27.—Fifteenth century.
Fig. 27.—15th century.

Fig. 28.—Fifteenth century, 1st half.
Fig. 28.—15th century, early half.

Fig. 29.—Middle of fifteenth century.
Fig. 29.—Mid-15th century.
The chief shapes to mark in this century in male head-dress is the increased height of the tall hats which rise to vie with the female fashions. We still see a round hat[96] with a rolled edge and long fall over one side, besides shorter folds in the crown, both scalloped or foliated at the edge, and this shape may be noted till about 1460. Some of these hats were made without a crown, as in Fig. 28 (see p. 94); the roll was decorated, as a rule, with jewelled studs. A top hat, something like our present shape, appears, but more belled at the top and also a padded, rolled brim. It was made in various rich materials, and often decorated with jewels. The peak-fronted hat still continued to be favoured till about 1480, its chief difference being a crown more eccentric in height. Tall cylinder hats, with folded brims or no brim, and other shapes are illustrated. The variety is so great through this period that it is well to study the vagaries of fashion which I have illustrated in sequence as far as possible; they were mostly used till about the last quarter of this century, when the low-crowned flat hat with turned-up brim began to secure the fashion. This was generally worn tilted on one side and often over a scarlet skull-cap. A large bunch of plumes came in with this hat, set up from the front, curving backwards, and giving a very grand effect: with most[100] of the tall hats the feather was set at the back.
The main trends in men's headwear during this century are the taller hats that compete with women’s styles. We still see a round hat[96] featuring a rolled edge and a long drop on one side, along with shorter folds in the crown, which can be scalloped or foliate at the edges. This style remained popular until around 1460. Some of these hats were made without a crown, as shown in Fig. 28 (see p. 94); usually, the roll was adorned with jeweled studs. A top hat, somewhat similar to today’s design, emerged but with a bell shape at the top and a padded, rolled brim. It was crafted from various luxurious materials and often decorated with gems. The peak-fronted hat continued to be popular until about 1480, mainly differing by a crown that was more unusually tall. Tall cylinder hats, whether with folded brims or no brim, showcased a variety of shapes. The fashion diversity during this period is significant, so it’s useful to explore the style changes I’ve illustrated in sequence as much as possible; these styles predominated until the last quarter of the century when a low-crowned flat hat with a turned-up brim started to become fashionable. This new style was typically worn tilted to one side and often accompanied by a scarlet skull cap. A large bunch of plumes came into style with this hat, positioned at the front, curving backward for a striking look; with most[100] tall hats, the feather was placed at the back.

Fig. 30.—Fifteenth century.
Fig. 30.—15th century.

Fig. 31.—Fifteenth century, 1st half.
Fig. 31.—15th century, 1st half.

Fig. 32.—Fifteenth century, 2nd half.
Fig. 32.—15th century, second half.
The notable change in the tunic, which was worn both very short and to the ground, was the arrangement of folds to the back and front, gathered to a V shape at the waist. The hanging sleeve began to go out of favour after the middle of the century, but the sleeve or cuff covering the hand was continued till the end of this century.
The significant shift in the tunic, which could be worn either very short or all the way to the ground, involved how the folds were arranged at the back and front, gathered into a V shape at the waist. The hanging sleeve started to fall out of popularity after the mid-century, but the sleeve or cuff that covered the hand remained in style until the end of this century.
A sleeve, full at the shoulder, is found, and short, round, padded sleeves came in, worn over a close-fitting sleeve. This short sleeve became raised on the shoulder, and was cut or looped up the outer side: a long loose outer sleeve is also seen in conjunction with these short ones. A very short jacket is notable, of a plain square shape, with a plain sleeve on the left arm and a hanging sleeve on the right to the knee. The tight-fitting jerkin, laced down the front, was worn with this as with most other coats.
A sleeve that’s wide at the shoulder is present, and short, rounded, padded sleeves came into style, worn over a fitted sleeve. This short sleeve was raised at the shoulder and cut or looped on the outer side: a long, loose outer sleeve also appeared alongside these short ones. A very short jacket stands out, featuring a simple square shape, with a plain sleeve on the left arm and a hanging sleeve on the right that reaches the knee. The tight-fitting jerkin, laced down the front, was worn with this jacket, just like with most other coats.

Fig. 33.—End of fifteenth century.
Fig. 33.—Late 1400s.

Fig. 34.—Fifteenth century, 2nd half.
Fig. 34.—15th century, 2nd half.

Plate VIIIa—(a) Suit of Embroidered Silk. 1610-30. (b) Three Sword Hangers Embroidered in Gold. Charles II. (c) Braided Suit. 1670-90.
Plate VIIIa—(a) Suit of Embroidered Silk. 1610-30. (b) Three Sword Hangers Embroidered in Gold. Charles II. (c) Braided Suit. 1670-90.

Fig. 35.—Fifteenth-century Shoes and Clogs.
Fig. 35.—15th Century Shoes and Clogs.
The high collar to the throat had gone out for a collar opened in front. Very short and very long "chasubles" were worn with or without sleeves which were gathered high and full at the shoulders.[104] The sleeves were now sometimes slit open at the back and held with several ties, as linen sleeves are now shown with these.
The high collar up to the throat has been replaced by a front-opening collar. Very short and very long "chasubles" are worn with or without sleeves, which are gathered high and full at the shoulders.[104] The sleeves are now sometimes split open at the back and held with a few ties, similar to how linen sleeves are currently styled.
Parti-coloured tights were not so much favoured through this period, but a decorated thigh, or part of the thigh and knee, was a favourite method of enrichment.
Parti-colored tights weren't really in style during this time, but a decorated thigh, or part of the thigh and knee, was a popular way to add some flair.

Fig. 36.
Fig. 36.
A long coat came in at the later part of this time, with a deep V-shaped collar meeting at the waist; it was also cut into a square shape at the shoulders, as in Fig. 43 (see p. 119). A loose bell-shaped sleeve usually went with this, often opened in the front of the upper arm. A short square cape is at times seen in conjunction with this. A low square or round neck shape came in during the last quarter of this century, filled in with a fine gathered lawn and a tight-fitting coat with a pleated[108] skirt and full padded sleeves, or a tight sleeve with a full puff or spherical upper part.
A long coat became popular later in this period, featuring a deep V-shaped collar that met at the waist; it also had square-cut shoulders, as shown in Fig. 43 (see p. 119). This coat typically came with loose bell-shaped sleeves, often opening at the front of the upper arm. Sometimes, a short square cape was seen alongside it. In the last quarter of this century, a low square or round neckline emerged, often filled with fine gathered fabric and paired with a fitted coat that had a pleated[108] skirt and full padded sleeves, or a fitted sleeve with a full puffed or spherical upper section.

Fig. 37.
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, second half of 15th century.
Nos. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, variety of shapes from 1490
to 1630.
Fig. 37.
Items 1 through 8, from the second half of the 15th century.
Items 9 through 18, featuring a variety of shapes from 1490 to 1630.

Fig. 38.
Fig. 38.
- 14th century.
- 15th century.
- 15th century.
- Late 16th cent.
- 1580-1610.
- 1580-1610.
- 1605-1640.
- 1600-1625.
- 1550-1600.
- 1610-1640.
- 1590-1620.
- 1605-1630.
- 1675-1695.
- 1670-1690.
- 1680-1700.
- 1690-1720.
- 1680-1700.
- 1700-1750.
- 1700-1780.
- 1700-1760.
- 1740-1780.
- 1745-1780.
- 1770-1800.
- 1730-1760.
- 1700-1780.
- 1830-1860.
- 1780-1800.
- 1840-1870.
- 1840-1870.

Plate IX.—(a) Lady's Embroidered Silk Jacket. 1605-30. (b) Lady's Bodice of Silk Brocade. 1680-1700.
Plate IX.—(a) Lady's Embroidered Silk Jacket. 1605-30. (b) Lady's Bodice of Silk Brocade. 1680-1700.

Fig. 39.—Decorated Leather, 15th and 16th centuries.
Fig. 39.—Ornamental Leather, 15th and 16th centuries.
Shoes and boots were still worn with very long pointed toes till about 1465, when a proclamation was issued for beaks or piked shoes not to pass two inches, and after this time a broad round-toed shoe began to appear. Soft high boots to the top of the thigh, with folded top, belong to this century, as well as the fashionable boot to the calf. The sword or dagger was carried towards the front or side, and a small dagger across the belt at the back. The pouch or purse was also used as a dagger support.
Shoes and boots still had very long pointed toes until around 1465, when a proclamation was made that pointed shoes could not be longer than two inches. After that, broad round-toed shoes started to show up. Soft high boots that reached the thigh with a folded top were popular during this century, along with fashionable boots that came up to the calf. Swords or daggers were worn towards the front or side, while a small dagger was strapped across the belt at the back. A pouch or purse was also used to support the dagger.
CHAPTER V[109]
SIXTEENTH CENTURY. CHARACTER OF TRIMMINGS.
Before the 16th century we find the art of decoration in costume had been confined chiefly to applied ornamental bands at the neck, waist, and borders of skirt and cloak. They had up till this time utilised, with great artistry of design (no doubt partly due to the heraldic study), the patterns of the finely decorated damasks and velvets. The counter colour effects and relative proportions, such as a small-patterned, dull-coloured silk setting off a large full-coloured design was ably considered, as well as the introduction of a nicely-balanced black note or setting, which proved these designers were highly skilled in judgment of style. They also discovered the art of giving enrichment and lightness to the effect by means of the[110] various serrated edgings to the materials, which also gave a flutter to the movement. A preference of lacing for fastening added to the charm of the dress, but the long rows of close buttons were also a feature of the clinging robes, the clasps and brooches, neck-chains, girdle, belt, and wallet being further very important items of enrichment to the effect.
Before the 16th century, the art of costume decoration was mainly limited to decorative bands at the neck, waist, and edges of skirts and cloaks. Until this time, designers skillfully used patterns from finely decorated damasks and velvets, likely influenced by heraldic studies. They carefully considered contrasting colors and proportions, like using a small-patterned, dull-colored silk to highlight a large, vibrant design, and they introduced well-balanced black accents, demonstrating their keen sense of style. They also mastered the art of enhancing the look with various serrated edges on materials, which added a sense of movement. A preference for laces used as fasteners added charm to the outfits, while long rows of closely spaced buttons were also a feature of the fitted dresses. Clasps, brooches, neck chains, girdles, belts, and wallets were all significant elements that enriched the overall effect.
On coming to the 16th century we enter what may be termed the slashed and puffed period. The sleeves of Henry VIII's reign are very rich in design and jewel-setting, the design of the sleeve as in Fig. 40 giving a striking effect, the angle of the top sleeve being held out by the stiffness of the under silk one. The neck-setting and festooning of the jewel-chains play an important part in the design on the plain velvet corset bodices. The head-dress is one of the most remarkable, and gave a great chance for individual arrangement in binding the back fall to set at various angles on the shaped cap piece, combining severity with a big loose draping which is extremely picturesque. With Edward VI commences what may be termed the braided period of decoration. This latter came suitably with the stiffer[111] corsage and set up. Mary's reign was not of attractive severity, but the over-robe with the short circular sleeve at the shoulder and high collar was a graceful creation, and was retained by many as late as 1630. There was little to admire in the Elizabethan age as regards design, except the beauty of the materials and the exquisite needlework. The proportions of the dresses were exceedingly ugly, and the pleated farthingale an absurdity. The male dress had much interest and often beauty of setting and decorative effect. The slashed materials gave a broken quality to what would otherwise be a hard effect, and it also cleverly introduced another colour change through the suit. There will be found many examples in these illustrations of the pricked and punctured designs on leather-work which are worth examining for modern treatment.
On reaching the 16th century, we enter what might be called the slashed and puffed era. The sleeves from Henry VIII's time are rich in design and embellishments, with the sleeve design, as seen in Fig. 40, creating a striking look, where the top sleeve stands out due to the stiffness of the underlying silk one. The draping of the jewel chains plays an important role in the design of the plain velvet corset bodices. The headdress is particularly notable, allowing for individual styling in how the back fall is arranged to sit at different angles on the shaped cap piece, blending a strict look with loose draping that is quite picturesque. With Edward VI, we start what could be described as the braided period of decoration. This period matched well with the stiffer[111] corsage and set-up. Mary’s reign didn’t showcase an attractive severity, but the over-robe featuring a short circular sleeve at the shoulder and high collar was an elegant creation, and it remained popular among many until as late as 1630. There was little to appreciate in Elizabethan fashion in terms of design, except for the beauty of the materials and exquisite embroidery. The proportions of the dresses were quite unappealing, and the pleated farthingale was rather absurd. Men's fashion, on the other hand, had a lot of interesting and often beautiful designs and decorative elements. The slashed fabrics added a textured quality that softened what might otherwise seem overly rigid, and they also cleverly introduced additional color variations throughout the outfit. Many examples of pricked and punctured designs on leather work can be found in these illustrations and are worth examining for modern interpretations.
Quilting and pleating were ably combined with the braiding, and we see the clever adaptation of straw patterns sewn on (a feature of the late 16th century), which harmonised with the gold braidings or gold lace, or resembled the same effect.
Quilting and pleating were skillfully combined with the braiding, showcasing the smart use of straw patterns sewn on (a characteristic of the late 16th century), which coordinated with the gold braidings or gold lace, or had a similar effect.
The trimmings of braid were often enriched with precious or ornamental stones[112] and pearls, the stomacher, waist, front band down the skirt, and borders of most garments. The points of slashes were often held by jewelled settings, and the long slashes were caught here and there with the same.
The decorative braids were often enhanced with valuable or decorative stones[112] and pearls, adorning the stomacher, waist, front band of the skirt, and the edges of most clothes. The tips of the slashes were frequently secured by jeweled settings, and the long slashes were occasionally gathered with the same.
Another important item was the black stitchwork on linen, sometimes mingled with gold, so highly prized now for its beauty of design and effect, but beginning probably in the reign of Henry VII.
Another important item was the black stitchwork on linen, sometimes mixed with gold, now highly valued for its beautiful design and effect, but likely starting in the reign of Henry VII.
Short coats of this type of the Elizabethan age are marvels of skill, and many caps are still in existence. Fine linen ruffs and collars were often edged with this work, as well as with gold lace.
Short coats from the Elizabethan era are amazing examples of craftsmanship, and many caps still exist. Delicate linen ruffs and collars were often trimmed with this work, as well as with gold lace.
Jackets and caps, both male and female, bearing geometrical and scroll designs in gold, filled in with coloured needlework of flowers, birds, or animals have happily been preserved for our admiration.
Jackets and caps for both men and women, featuring geometric and scroll designs in gold, adorned with colorful embroidery of flowers, birds, or animals, have been well-preserved for us to admire.
Sequins appear on work from Henry VIII's time, and were much appreciated by the Elizabethan workers, who no doubt found the trembling glitter added much to the gold-lace settings and delicate veilings: long pear-shaped sequins were favoured for this. Sleeves were often separate, and could be changed at will.[113]
Sequins show up in creations from the time of Henry VIII and were greatly admired by the Elizabethan artisans, who surely found that the shimmering sparkle enhanced the golden lace and fine veils: long, pear-shaped sequins were especially popular for this. Sleeves were often detachable and could be swapped out as desired.[113]
SIXTEENTH CENTURY. HENRY VIII. FEMALE.
The hair at this period was parted in the centre and gathered into a plait at the back; it was also seen rather full and waved at the sides of the head, and a small circlet was often carried across the brow. A cap of velvet or gold brocade, sometimes with a padded front, curved over the ears to the neck, keeping the shape of the head. Over this again a velvet fall was turned back from the front or shaped as in the illustration, reaching to the shoulder. These falls were also bound into set-out shapes, which gave many picturesque effects.
The hair during this time was parted down the middle and styled into a braid at the back; it was also styled to look full and wavy at the sides of the head, with a small circlet often worn across the forehead. A cap made of velvet or gold brocade, sometimes with a padded front, curved around the ears to the neck, maintaining the shape of the head. On top of this, a velvet drape was styled either turned back from the front or shaped like in the illustration, reaching down to the shoulder. These drapes were also shaped into structured designs, creating many visually striking effects.
Dress had now taken a new phase, and the set bodice became a lasting feature. At this period the waist was rather short, and the neck, arranged in a low square or round form, generally filled in with gathered lawn. The upper part of the sleeve was often divided from the bodice by ties with lawn puffs, and was made in a full circular form, slashed or puffed and banded, with a tight-fitting sleeve on the forearm. Another type divided the upper and lower part of the arm at the shoulder[116] and elbow, the forearm being effectively tied or laced, and the under lawn sleeve pulled through; small slashings are also seen on these. At times a bell-shaped sleeve was worn, showing a slashed or puffed under one. Many dresses were still cut in one, and were often high-necked; with these usually a girdle or band of drapery was worn, and some skirts opened up the front, showing a rich underskirt.
Fashion had now entered a new era, and the fitted bodice became a staple. During this time, the waist was rather short, and the neckline was typically arranged in a low square or round shape, often filled in with gathered fabric. The upper part of the sleeve was frequently separated from the bodice with ties and lawn puffs, crafted in a full circular shape, either slashed or puffed, and banded with a snug sleeve on the forearm. Another style featured a division between the upper and lower parts of the arm at the shoulder and elbow, with the forearm being effectively tied or laced, and the under sleeve pulled through; small slits were also visible on these. Occasionally, a bell-shaped sleeve was worn, showcasing a slashed or puffed under sleeve. Many dresses were still made in one piece and often had high necklines; with these, it was common to wear a girdle or draped band, and some skirts opened at the front, revealing a luxurious underskirt.

Fig. 40.—Sixteenth century, 2nd quarter.
Fig. 40.—16th century, 2nd quarter.

Fig. 41.—Period Henry VIII.
Fig. 41.—Henry VIII Era.
Full skirts, heavily pleated at the waist, were worn in the earlier part of this reign, banded in varying widths of designs to about the knee; but a new development was in progress—a stiff, bell-shaped dress, set on hoops over a rich underskirt which usually bore a jewelled band down the centre, the upper one being divided in front to display this feature. The bodice with this type becomes longer in the waist, and was made on a stiff corset. Gloves are occasionally seen, serrated at the cuff-end. Shoes of the slashed character and square toes were also worn by the ladies, but many preferred a shoe with a moderately rounded toe.
Full skirts, heavily pleated at the waist, were popular in the early part of this reign, with different widths of designs down to about the knee; however, a new trend was emerging—a stiff, bell-shaped dress worn over hoops with a luxurious underskirt that typically featured a jeweled band down the center, and the upper part was split in front to showcase this detail. The bodice of this style becomes longer in the waist and was made on a stiff corset. Gloves are sometimes seen, trimmed at the cuff-end. Ladies also wore shoes with slashed designs and square toes, but many preferred a shoe with a moderately rounded toe.
The first mention of a leather umbrella is 1611, but this is a rare instance, as they were not in use till the 18th century here,[118] though they are noted in continental prints during the 17th century.
The first mention of a leather umbrella is in 1611, but this is a rare case, as they weren't commonly used here until the 18th century,[118] although they are seen in European prints from the 17th century.

Fig. 42.—Sixteenth-century modes, 1st half Henry VIII.
Fig. 42.—Sixteenth-century styles, 1st half of Henry VIII's reign.
SIXTEENTH CENTURY. HENRY VIII. MALE.
The modes at the end of the last century now developed into a heavier character of design. The long hair soon began to be closely cut, and a short beard came into fashion. A flat type of hat was worn, with serrated brim, or tabs which could be turned down at times, and others were kept in place by a lacing cord through holes. There was also a flat "Tam o' Shanter" shape, generally worn well tilted on one side, and amongst the upper classes mostly adorned with feathers.
The styles at the end of the last century evolved into a bolder design character. Long hair started to be cut short, and a short beard became trendy. People wore a flat hat with a serrated brim or tabs that could be turned down at times, while others had a lacing cord through holes to keep them in place. There was also a flat "Tam o' Shanter" style, typically worn at a jaunty angle on one side, and among the upper classes, it was often decorated with feathers.
The V-shaped collar, or opening to the belt, was still retained on the jerkin, and plain or pleated skirts are seen, also a square close-fitting vest, with a low square neck, filled with gathered lawn, or one with a high neck and short collar, on which a very small ruff appeared for the first time, and at the wrist as well. These were now decorated with long slashes or gathered puffs: heraldic design was still seen on the breast, and even parti-colour[122] was worn, but this character was now treated more by decorating with coloured bands on the tunics or tights.
The V-shaped collar, or opening to the belt, was still part of the jerkin, and you could see both plain and pleated skirts, along with a square, fitted vest that had a low square neck filled with gathered fabric, or one with a high neck and short collar that featured a very small ruff for the first time, as well as at the wrist. These were now adorned with long slashes or gathered puffs: heraldic designs were still present on the chest, and even two-tone colors were worn, but this style was now more about decorating with colored bands on the tunics or tights.

Plate X.
Plate X.
- (a) Black Velvet Bodice. 1600-25. Pattern, see p. 292.
- (b) Five Embroidered Waistcoats. Between 1690 and 1800.

Fig. 43.—Period Henry VIII.
Fig. 43.—Era of Henry VIII.

Fig. 44.—Cap shapes. Period Henry VIII.
Fig. 44.—Cap styles. Time of Henry VIII.

Fig. 45.—Variety of shapes and slashing. Henry VIII.
Fig. 45.—Different shapes and cuts. Henry VIII.
Long coats were still worn of the shape described at the end of the 15th century, but a short surcoat was the mode, reaching just below the knee, sleeveless, or with the various hanging sleeves of this period, the fronts usually turned back to form a wide collar, either round or square in shape on the shoulder, or at times falling to a deep square at the back.
Long coats were still worn in the style described at the end of the 15th century, but short surcoats became fashionable, reaching just below the knee, either sleeveless or featuring the various hanging sleeves of this period. The fronts typically turned back to create a wide collar, which could be round or square on the shoulders, or sometimes extending to a deep square at the back.
The sleeves were full in the upper part, tightening to the wrist, sometimes open up to the elbow and laced, or they were pleated into a full round shape at the shoulder. Puffs and slashings increased in these designs, and by 1520 we find the sleeves mostly divided into puffed and slashed forms, which grew to fantastic proportions.
The sleeves were wide at the top, tapering to the wrist, sometimes flaring out to the elbow and laced, or they were gathered into a full round shape at the shoulder. Puffs and slashes became more common in these designs, and by 1520, we mostly see sleeves divided into puffed and slashed styles, which grew to extravagant sizes.
Very short, tight breeches or trunks, with a front flap or codpiece, were decorated to match the body design and colour schemes; they increased in length to the knee, or just below, during this reign, and usually finished in a serrated roll.
Very short, fitted pants or trunks, featuring a front flap or codpiece, were styled to match the body's design and color schemes; they became longer, reaching the knee or just below, during this era, and typically ended in a jagged roll.

Plate XI.—16 Leather Boots and Shoes. Between 1535 and 1860.
Plate XI.—16 Leather Boots and Shoes. Between 1535 and 1860.
- 1740-1780.
- 1535-1550.
- 1680-1700.
- 1645-1690.
- 1665-1685.
- 1690-1710.
- 1845-1860.
- 1790-1820.
- 1665-1670.
- 1800-1820.
- 1820-1840.
- 1820-1840.
- 1815-1850.
- 1760-1780.
- 1650-1670.
- 1630-1660.

Fig. 46.—Footwear, 1510-1540.
Fig. 46.—Shoes, 1510-1540.
Shoes were of the square form, some very short in front, held on by a strap across the instep, others with fronts to the instep.[124] The corners were often brought out to a point on each side of the toes, and the mode of decorating with slashing and punctures made them very interesting. The sides of these shoes are very low, from ¾ to 1 inch, and no heels are seen. A big, round shape was also favoured, which increased in width till a proclamation forbade it exceeding 6 inches. Chains were still a decorative feature round the neck, and the belt carried a sword and pouch, or, amongst the working classes, other necessities.
Shoes were square-shaped, some very short in the front, held on by a strap across the instep, while others had fronts that covered the instep.[124] The corners often came to a point on each side of the toes, and the way they were decorated with slashes and holes made them quite interesting. The sides of these shoes were very low, about ¾ to 1 inch, and they had no heels. A big, round shape was also popular, which widened until a law limited it to 6 inches. Chains were still a decorative feature around the neck, and the belt held a sword and pouch, or, for the working class, other essentials.
SIXTEENTH CENTURY. THE REIGNS OF EDWARD VI AND MARY. FEMALE.
In the reign of Edward VI, which was so short, as also in that of Mary, there was little time to form a real character. These reigns form developing links to the Elizabethan era, so I have taken them in one chapter.
In the short reign of Edward VI, and also during Mary’s reign, there was hardly any time to establish a real character. These reigns are important stepping stones to the Elizabethan era, so I’ve covered them in one chapter.

Fig. 50.—Costumes, 1554-1568.
Fig. 50.—Outfits, 1554-1568.

Fig. 51.—Costumes, 1568-1610.
Fig. 51.—Outfits, 1568-1610.
With Edward VI the same shaped cap is seen as that of Henry VIII, and with Mary's accession, the head-dress is curved to the head in a like manner, but it now became more of a hat form and took a brim curved in on the brow; this was[128] often worn over the little tight curved cap, or showed the hair waved out at the sides, often netted with gold and pearls. A fall of velvet, silk, or veiling was still retained till the very high ruff or collar came in the Elizabethan days. A small-crowned hat, with a brooch and feather in front, and a full gathered crown came in before Elizabeth's time, when we see many eccentric shapes, such as the tall hat with a feather at the side, and the witch-like hats towards the end of her reign.
With Edward VI, the same style of cap is seen as that of Henry VIII, and when Mary came to the throne, the headpiece was shaped to fit the head similarly, but it became more like a hat with a brim curving in at the forehead. This was[128] often worn over the small, tightly curved cap or showed the hair styled out at the sides, often netted with gold and pearls. A fall of velvet, silk, or veil was still kept until the very high ruff or collar became popular in the Elizabethan era. A small-crowned hat with a brooch and feather in the front, along with a full gathered crown, appeared before Elizabeth's time, when we began to see many eccentric shapes, such as the tall hat with a feather on the side and the witch-like hats toward the end of her reign.
The bodice, which became longer in the first reign, still retained the full belled oversleeve or the full puffed sleeve to the end of Mary's reign, also the same square neck shape with curved-up front, now often filled with silk quilted with pearls up to the neck. High-necked dresses set with a small ruff became general in Mary's reign. We also find a tight sleeve gathered in a circular puff at the shoulder or set in a rolled epaulet.
The bodice, which became longer in the first reign, still kept the full belled oversleeve or full puffed sleeve until the end of Mary's reign, along with the same square neck shape with a curved-up front, now often filled with silk quilted with pearls up to the neck. High-necked dresses with a small ruff became popular in Mary's reign. We also see a tight sleeve gathered into a circular puff at the shoulder or set in a rolled epaulet.
The same shaped skirt of the hooped bell form (sometimes very pleated in Mary's reign) or divided in front to show the underskirt as described under Henry VIII, was worn.
The same shaped skirt in a hooped bell style (sometimes quite pleated during Mary's reign) or split at the front to reveal the underskirt as mentioned under Henry VIII was worn.
The short square shape and the heavy[129] round shoe is seen in Mary's reign, but fashion then preferred a rather pointed oval shoe, well up the instep with higher sides, decorated with characteristic slashing. Gloves are seen in many portraits up to this period, but of a plain make minus embroidery, and a circular fan of feathers was carried.
The short square shape and the heavy[129] round shoe are noticeable during Mary's reign, but fashion at that time favored a more pointed oval shoe, which fit higher on the instep with elevated sides, typically adorned with distinctive slashing. Gloves appear in many portraits from this era, but they were simple in design without any embroidery, and a circular feather fan was used.
SIXTEENTH CENTURY. THE REIGNS OF EDWARD VI AND MARY. MALE.
With Edward VI and Mary a more refined and sober type of style set in. The hair was now worn short and combed backwards. The flat hat of the earlier shapes lasted to Elizabeth's reign; becoming smaller in width, with a turned-down, curved brim and a fuller crown encircled with a gold band or set with a feather worn at the right-hand side. A small tight-fitting round hat with a rolled brim and a feather in front is also of this later mode. Through these reigns a small square turned-over collar or a very small ruff set on a high collar came into use, which increased to a larger ruff in Mary's reign. A small ruff was also worn at the wrist, many of these were[132] edged with black-stitch designs. The heavy puffed sleeves became tight and started from a small epaulet or puffed roll; some of these had a small cuff at the wrist or a frill. Braided designs became very elaborate on a close-fitting, padded, and round-shaped jerkin with a short skirt, which appeared in the first reign, and this skirt was often long enough to fasten just under the codpiece. Short trunks at times worn half-way down the thigh were slashed, banded, and puffed for decoration. No parti-colour was now worn or striped effects on tights, except amongst the soldiers in the reign of Mary. Short capes to the length of the trunks of a plain round form sloping from the shoulders, or a square type with a high square collar and loose sleeves, are seen; a tunic also of the earlier character with a V-shaped collar and full sleeve comes into this reign, and we note the earlier types of shoes mingling with the newer pointed oval-shaped shoe which now continued for the remainder of this century.
With Edward VI and Mary, a more polished and serious style emerged. Hair was worn short and slicked back. The flat hat of the earlier styles remained popular until Elizabeth’s reign, becoming narrower with a turned-down, curved brim and a fuller crown decorated with a gold band or a feather positioned on the right side. A small, snug round hat with a rolled brim and a feather in the front also became common during this later period. Throughout these reigns, a small square turned-over collar or a very small ruff set on a high collar came into fashion, which expanded into a larger ruff during Mary’s reign. A small ruff was also worn at the wrist, many of which were [132] trimmed with black-stitch designs. The heavy puffed sleeves were replaced with tighter fits that began from a small epaulet or puffed roll; some featured a small cuff at the wrist or a frill. Braided designs became quite intricate on a form-fitting, padded, round-shaped jerkin with a short skirt that emerged in the early reigns, and this skirt was often long enough to fasten just below the codpiece. Short trunks, sometimes worn halfway down the thigh, were slashed, banded, and puffed for decoration. Parti-color designs and striped patterns on tights were no longer worn, except among soldiers in Mary’s reign. Short capes, either the length of the trunks and in a simple round shape sloping from the shoulders, or a square style with a high square collar and loose sleeves, became fashionable; a tunic of earlier style with a V-shaped collar and full sleeves also appeared in this reign, and we can see earlier types of shoes blending with the newer pointed oval-shaped shoe that continued for the rest of the century.

Fig. 52.—Costumes, 1554-1580.
Fig. 52.—Outfits, 1554-1580.

Fig. 53.—Costumes, 1570-1605.
Fig. 53.—Outfits, 1570-1605.
In Mary's reign the round-shaped doublet began to protrude from the breast to the waist in a round form with slightly longer skirts or small tabs, while the trunks[133] assumed large circular proportions and were sometimes set on tight knee-breeches. The capes remained about the same.
In Mary's reign, the round-shaped doublet started to stick out from the chest to the waist in a rounded style with slightly longer skirts or small tabs, while the trunks[133] took on larger circular shapes and were sometimes paired with tight knee-breeches. The capes stayed pretty much the same.
SIXTEENTH CENTURY. ELIZABETH. FEMALE.
The costly splendour of attire is well known in Elizabeth's reign, which began with the same form of hair and head-dress as with Mary, the hat being set rather higher on the hair. The ruffs, which were imported already starched from Holland, assumed larger proportions and complications when the methods of starching became known in England about 1564. Stow describes ruffs growing to a quarter of a yard deep; these were no doubt supported by piccalilloes, though they are not actually mentioned till after 1600, but they surely came with the fan-shaped structures of these later days. White, red, blue or purple colours were used in the starching, and yellow in the latter days of this century. The introduction of this curved fanlike collar setting became a grand and complicated feature right into the 17th century. "Make up" became very apparent on the faces at this time,[136] for Bishop Hall censured the fashion in a choice sermon, saying, "Hear this, ye plaster-faced Jezabels! God will one day wash them with fire and brimstone."
The expensive glamour of clothing is well known from Elizabeth's reign, which started with the same hairstyle and headwear as Mary's, but the hat was worn a bit higher. The ruffs, imported already starched from Holland, became bigger and more complex when the starching techniques became known in England around 1564. Stow describes ruffs reaching up to a quarter of a yard deep; these were likely supported by piccalilloes, though they weren't mentioned until after 1600. They surely originated with the fan-shaped styles of later periods. White, red, blue, or purple colors were used in starching, with yellow appearing later in the century. The introduction of this curved, fan-like collar became a significant and intricate feature right into the 17th century. "Makeup" became quite noticeable on people's faces at this time,[136] as Bishop Hall criticized the trend in a notable sermon, saying, "Hear this, you plaster-faced Jezebels! God will one day wash them with fire and brimstone."

Fig. 54.—Elizabethan modes.
Fig. 54.—Elizabethan styles.

Plate XII.
Plate 12.
- (a) Lady's Outdoor Costume. 1785-95.
- (b) Costume. Early 18th Century.
- (c) Silk Brocade Dress. 1760-80.

Fig. 55.
Fig. 55.
The bodices grew very long and pointed in the waist, the neck setting being mostly treated in the same V shape, even open down to the waist point was filled with a decorated stomacher, and a deep oval-shaped neck was seen at the end of the reign. An outer opened sleeve was now favoured, caught in front at the elbow and hanging to the knee over a fairly tight undersleeve with a turned-back lace cuff or ruffle. With this came the high-set fan ruff on its wooden support at the back of the neck, and consequently a higher coiffure.
The bodices became very long and pointed at the waist, with the neckline generally designed in a similar V shape, often open down to the waist. This was filled with a decorated stomacher, and a deep oval-shaped neck appeared toward the end of the period. An outer open sleeve was now popular, secured in front at the elbow and hanging down to the knee over a fairly tight undersleeve with a turned-back lace cuff or ruffle. Along with this came the high-set fan ruff on its wooden support at the back of the neck, leading to a taller hairstyle.

Fig. 56.
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 1540-50, and other shoe forms worn in the reign of
Elizabeth.
Fig. 56.
Numbers 1, 2, 3, 1540-50, and other shoe styles worn during Elizabeth's reign.
The same character of skirt continued as in the earlier reigns on hoops at the lower part, but they became much fuller and rounder at the hips till about 1590, when the full pleated skirt was supported on a farthingale or hoop which was set with a gathered circle in the same goffered design as the ruffs at the edge. These reached their extreme dimensions at the end of this reign, when the sleeves also assumed a full padded shape and large[138] epaulets also came in. An overdress with a full pleated back (like the Watteau dress) was in fashion from the middle of this reign, and we are lucky to possess some specimens in the Victoria and Albert Museum of which I am able to give the dimensions. Small looking-glasses were carried, and were also inset on the round feather fans. Perfumed gloves, elaborately embroidered, were introduced during this reign. Silk stockings were worn by Elizabeth for the first time in 1560, and worsted stockings were made in England in 1564. Corsets of pierced steel are seen in France from the late 16th and 17th century, and may have been in use here, though wood, cane, and whalebone were the chief supports. Shoes became narrow and even pointed, while the heel began to increase to considerable heights. The buskins of Queen Elizabeth now at Oxford are raised to 3 inches in height by the aid of a thick sole, and shoes A and B, Fig. 61, are also reported to have belonged to her. Chopins for heightening the stature were in use on the Continent, but I believe did not appear here; but very thick corked soles and high heels were introduced for this purpose.
The style of skirts remained similar to earlier periods, supported by hoops at the bottom, but by the late 1580s, they became much fuller and rounder at the hips. Around 1590, skirts with full pleats were supported by a farthingale or hoop that had a gathered design like the ruffs at the edges. These skirts reached their largest sizes by the end of this period, and sleeves also took on a full padded shape with large epaulets becoming fashionable. An overdress with a full pleated back, similar to the Watteau dress, became popular in the middle of this period, and we are fortunate to have some examples in the Victoria and Albert Museum, for which I can provide the measurements. Small mirrors were carried and were also integrated into round feather fans. Perfumed gloves with elaborate embroidery were introduced during this time. Silk stockings were worn by Elizabeth for the first time in 1560, and worsted stockings began being made in England in 1564. Corsets made of pierced steel appeared in France in the late 16th and 17th centuries, and may have been used here, although wooden, cane, and whalebone were the main supports. Shoes became narrow and even pointed, while heels began to rise to significant heights. Queen Elizabeth’s buskins now at Oxford have a heel height of 3 inches due to a thick sole, and shoes A and B, Fig. 61, are also said to have belonged to her. Chopins used to increase height were common on the Continent, but I believe they did not make it here; however, very thick corked soles and high heels were introduced for that purpose.

Plate XIII.
Plate 13.
- (a) Silk Coat. 1735-55.
- (b) Brocade Silk Coat. 1745-60. Pattern, see p. 308.
- (c) Embroidered Cloth Coat. 1770-90.
[139]SIXTEENTH CENTURY. ELIZABETH. MALE.
In this reign a very neat small-pointed beard was the fashion, the hair being brushed up as high as possible and often fulled out at the sides, and a "chic" appearance was sought after. A stiff belled top-hat with an egret at the right side made its first appearance with a curved brim, also one of a tapered shape with a smallish round brim, and another very small round hat with a curved brim, a clasp and feather being mostly worn on the front of each. The brims of all the hats began to enlarge at the end of the century when the very high crowned wide brimmed hat made its appearance, sometimes with a peaked top, and beaver is first mentioned in their make.
During this time, a very neat, small-pointed beard was in style, with hair brushed up as high as possible and often fluffed out at the sides, aiming for a "chic" look. A stiff, bell-shaped top hat with an egret on the right side made its first appearance, along with a tapered hat that had a smaller round brim, and another very small round hat with a curved brim, typically adorned with a clasp and feather at the front. The brims of all the hats started to get larger as the century progressed, culminating in the emergence of a very high-crowned, wide-brimmed hat, sometimes featuring a peaked top, with beaver first mentioned in their construction.
Large circular ruffs became all the rage besides the small turned-over collar. The round doublet with protruding front became tighter at the waist, the protuberance taking a punchlike pointed form curving to almost between the legs and sloping sharply up the hips to the back. This was set with a very short tab or tabs on[140] padded breeches tightening to the knee, which usually had very small trunks on the upper part, and large, stuffed trunk hose also appeared. The stockings were brought over these in a roll above the knee. Up to this time tights were made of wool, worsted, fine cloth, frieze, and canvas. The slashings, pleating, and gatherings of the period were of a much neater character, and punched patterns and pricked materials came into use.
Large circular ruffs became very popular alongside the small turned-over collar. The round doublet with a protruding front got tighter at the waist, creating a pointed bulge that curved almost between the legs and angled sharply up the hips to the back. This was accompanied by a very short tab or tabs on[140] padded breeches that tightened to the knee, which usually had very small trunks on the upper part, and large, stuffed trunk hose also emerged. The stockings were rolled over these above the knee. Until this time, tights were made from wool, worsted, fine cloth, frieze, and canvas. The slashings, pleating, and gatherings of the period were much neater, and punched patterns and pricked materials became popular.
Close-fitting high boots, generally with serrated tops and thick soles curving into a short heel, are features of this time. The shoe had a long front decorated with slashings (often caught with jewels), and an oval toe which became almost pointed in the last years of this century. A short top-boot rising to the calf was also in use, mostly with a little fur edge at the top, and these were often pricked with patterns.
Close-fitting high boots, typically with serrated tops and thick soles that curve into a short heel, are characteristic of this period. The shoes had a long front decorated with slashings (often embellished with jewels), and an oval toe that nearly became pointed in the final years of this century. A short top-boot reaching up to the calf was also worn, usually featuring a small fur trim at the top, and these were often adorned with patterns.

Fig. 57.—Elizabethan modes.
Fig. 57.—Elizabethan styles.
CHAPTER VI[142]
THE CHARACTER OF TRIMMINGS THROUGH THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY.
JAMES I.
The braiding and small slashing continued of a similar character to the end of the Elizabethan age. The slashing now began to be treated with a larger effect and less elaboration, but pricking and punching were still much used for enriching surfaces. An improved style of design was evident.
The braiding and small slashing went on in a similar way until the end of the Elizabethan era. The slashing began to be used in a bolder manner and with less detail, but pricking and punching were still commonly used to enhance surfaces. A better design style was clearly emerging.
The female bodice was arranged with a long stomacher, often shaped into curved forms at the point, and this was set with jewels or embroidery, otherwise the bodice was decorated with braiding and jewels as in Elizabeth's reign. The full sleeves were embellished with small slashes (making diamond squares), puffs, or[143] pricked and punched designs. A turned-up cuff or ruff of pointed lace finished the wrist, braided epaulets formed a beautiful feature of the effect, and the front of the underskirt was decorated with a jewelled band or conventional design, as was also the border of the overskirt. Caps of an interesting curved form beautifully embroidered in gold and coloured silks are seen, of which I give patterns; also loose jackets of the same work were in use when not in full dress.
The women's bodice was designed with a long stomacher, often shaped into curved forms at the tip, and this was adorned with jewels or embroidery. Otherwise, the bodice was decorated with braiding and gems like in Elizabeth's time. The full sleeves featured small slashes (creating diamond shapes), puffs, or[143] pricked and punched patterns. A turned-up cuff or ruff made of pointed lace finished off the wrist, and braided epaulets added a lovely touch to the overall look. The front of the underskirt was decorated with a jeweled band or a classic design, and the border of the overskirt had a similar decoration. Caps with an intriguing curved shape, beautifully embroidered in gold and colorful silks, were also seen, of which I provide patterns; additionally, loose jackets featuring similar work were worn when not in full dress.
CHARLES I.
Many beautifully embroidered caps, jerkins, jackets, and shirts are seen at this period in gold and black or coloured silks. Slashings of this reign, though in fashion, had commenced to go out; and those retained were of a large character, mostly from the neck or shoulder to the breast. The favoured sleeves were cut into straps to the elbow or wrist, and were often edged with braid, either side meeting together and lining the forearm, the body being treated in the same way. The open-fronted sleeve was set with buttons[144] and loops or long braided buttonholes with frayed or knotted ends, though these were not generally fastened. The tight undersleeve was often set with gold or silver narrow braids down the front and back seams, and close lines of small braids horizontally round the arm, or vertically when the outer sleeve was treated horizontally, this gave a beautiful counterchanged effect.
Many beautifully embroidered caps, jackets, and shirts were popular during this time, made from gold and black or colorful silks. Slashings that were fashionable in this era began to fade out, and those that were still in style were large, mostly from the neck or shoulder to the chest. The preferred sleeves were cut into straps reaching the elbow or wrist, often edged with braid, meeting together and lining the forearm, with the body styled similarly. The open-front sleeves featured buttons[144] and loops or long braided buttonholes with frayed or knotted ends, though these weren't usually fastened. The tight undersleeves often had narrow gold or silver braids down the front and back seams, with closely placed small braids going horizontally around the arm, or vertically if the outer sleeve was styled horizontally, creating a beautiful contrast.
Many of the ladies' caps of this time had beautiful gold scrolls, with flowers and birds embroidered in coloured silks, also loose jackets of the same were in use. The bodice was banded with braids or lace on the front and seams, and the stomacher was often of fine embroidery; set rosettes or bows were placed at the waist. Other finishing effects of collar or sleeve, and the button and buttonhole decorations were made important features on both male and female sleeves, and even down the front of the outer skirt when it was not treated with lace. Red heels to shoes began to be worn and continued to the end of the 18th century in marked favour.
Many women's caps from this time featured beautiful gold scrolls, with flowers and birds embroidered in colored silk. Loose jackets made of the same material were also popular. The bodice was trimmed with braids or lace along the front and seams, and the stomacher often had fine embroidery. Rosettes or bows were commonly placed at the waist. Additional decorative elements on the collar or sleeves, as well as button and buttonhole details, became significant features on both men's and women's sleeves, and even down the front of the outer skirt when it wasn’t adorned with lace. Red heels on shoes started to be worn and remained popular until the end of the 18th century.
[145]THE COMMONWEALTH.
During this short period the character and placing of braiding was the same as in the latter part of last reign; slashing had almost completely gone out, except for the treatment of some ladies' sleeves cut into bands. A very sober effect was assumed in colour schemes, besides a plainer treatment in decoration, and a deep plain collar or a small turn-over one was chiefly worn by the men, while the hat of the Puritan rose to an absurd height, with a wide flat brim.
During this brief time, the style and placement of braiding remained the same as in the later part of the previous reign; slashing had nearly disappeared, except for how some women's sleeves were designed with bands. Color schemes took on a very subdued look, along with a simpler approach to decoration. Men primarily wore a deep plain collar or a small turned-over collar, while the Puritan hat became ridiculously tall, featuring a wide flat brim.
CHARLES II.
This may be named the period of ribbon trimmings, though braiding was treated in broad lines on the short jackets and sleeves, and down the sides of the breeches. A preference is shown for gold and silver lace, or amongst the élite purfled silk edges; the new mode being a decoration of groups of ribbon loops placed about the suit or dress. The notable feature with the female dress was the gathering of drapery by means of jewelled clasps, and groups of ribbon loops were also used,[146] as with the male dress. The edges of the materials were sometimes cut into scalloped or classic forms, and a very simple voluminous character was fashion's aim.
This could be called the era of ribbon trimmings, although braiding was prominently featured on the short jackets and sleeves, as well as down the sides of the pants. There was a preference for gold and silver lace, or for the elite, silk edges with decorative trim; the new trend was to decorate outfits with clusters of ribbon loops. A key feature of women's fashion was the gathering of fabric using jeweled clasps, and ribbon loops were also used for men's attire. The edges of the fabrics were sometimes cut into scalloped or classic shapes, with a very simple, voluminous look being the goal of fashion.[146]
JAMES II AND WILLIAM AND MARY.
With the later type of long-skirted coat which began in Charles II's reign, a heavy style of braiding and buttoning came into vogue, all the seams of the coat besides the pockets and cuffs and fronts being braided, which fashion continued to the end of the century. Many coats began to be embroidered in the later reign, and waistcoats became a special feature for the display of fine needlecraft on the fronts and pockets, while quilting or imitations of it in various needlework designs are often seen. In the female dress a more elaborate interest was again taken in the stomachers and the jewelled claspings, while lengths of soft silk gathered into long puffs often edged the outer skirts or were used in smaller trimmings, and "classical" shapings of the edges of materials and sleeves are often seen, also heavy bands of rich embroidery bordered the underskirt or train.
With the later style of long-skirted coats that started during Charles II's reign, a heavier style of braiding and buttoning became popular, with all the seams of the coat, except for the pockets, cuffs, and fronts, being braided. This trend lasted until the end of the century. Many coats began to be embroidered in the later reign, and waistcoats became a key feature for showcasing fine needlework on the fronts and pockets, with quilting or imitations of it frequently appearing in various needlework designs. In women's fashion, there was renewed interest in stomachers and jeweled clasps, while lengths of soft silk gathered into long puffs often edged the outer skirts or were used in smaller trimmings, and "classical" designs for the edges of materials and sleeves were commonly seen, along with heavy bands of rich embroidery bordering the underskirt or train.
[147] SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. JAMES I. FEMALE.
We find much the same high forms of set-up head-dress continuing in fashion as in the later years of Elizabeth's reign; but the hair began to take a fuller shape, rather round, done up in tight frizzled curls, with the usual decorations of jewels, pearls, or set bows of this period. Hats with high crowns and small straight brims, with an upright set of small plumes, gradually assumed a larger brimmed character—often turned up on one side. The same absurd pleated hoop, with its hanging skirt, continued for some time (worn rather short); but we also see the longer and very full hooped-out skirt, with an overskirt opened in the front. The stomacher front became much enlarged during this reign, many having shaped designs at the point. Most bodices took a very deep curved front at the neck, and large padded sleeves narrowed at the wrist still continued, besides the high fan collar at the back of the neck, and large ruffs were used by many. There also appeared, later in the reign, a stiff round collar, set high in the neck, cut off straight across[150] the front, and the bodice took a very low square-cut neck, with a raised curved shape at the centre of neck. The tighter sleeve was also worn throughout this time, with the overdress and sleeve hanging almost to the ground, which often had a very angular cuff. A little later some sleeves began to be gathered at intervals into puffy forms. The waist also showed signs of shortening.
We see a lot of the same elaborate hairstyles continue to be popular as in the later years of Elizabeth's reign; however, hair started to take on a fuller, rounder shape, styled in tight, frizzed curls, adorned with the typical jewels, pearls, or decorative bows of this time. Hats with high crowns and small, straight brims, finished with upright small plumes, gradually evolved into designs with larger brims—often turned up on one side. The same ridiculous pleated hoop and its hanging skirt remained in fashion for a while (worn quite short), but we also saw the longer and very full hooped skirt, with an overskirt that opened in the front. The stomacher became much larger during this period, with many sporting shaped designs at the point. Most bodices featured a deep curved front at the neck, and large padded sleeves that tapered at the wrist continued to prevail, along with the high fan collar at the back of the neck, while many also wore large ruffs. Later in the reign, a stiff round collar appeared, set high at the neck, cut straight across the front, and the bodice had a very low square-cut neckline, raised in a curved shape at the center. Tighter sleeves were worn throughout this time, with the overdress and sleeves hanging nearly to the ground, often featuring very angular cuffs. A little later, some sleeves began to be gathered in at intervals to create puffy forms. The waist also started to show signs of getting shorter.

Fig. 58.
Fig. 58.

Fig. 59.—Costumes. Period, James I.
Fig. 59.—Costumes. Era, James I.
Shoes with rounded toes and latchets holding large rosettes were chiefly worn, and heels of various heights are seen. Chopins, still worn on the Continent, do not seem to have appeared here.
Shoes with rounded toes and straps holding big rosettes were mainly worn, and heels of different heights could be seen. Chopines, still worn in Europe, don't seem to have shown up here.
SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. JAMES I. MALE.
The hat was of the high-crowned type, perhaps higher than in the last reign. The brim had broadened, and feathers were placed upwards fantastically at the back and sides of crown. Brims were often fastened up on the right side with a jewel; otherwise a band was buckled in front. The hair was now allowed to fall longer again, and a pointed or square-shaped beard with a brushed-up moustache was the mode. Ruffs both large and small surrounded the[152] neck, and a flat fan-shaped collar was seen in the earlier years.
The hat had a high crown, maybe even taller than in the previous era. The brim was wider, and feathers were arranged upward in a fancy way at the back and sides of the crown. Brims were often pinned up on the right side with a jewel; otherwise, there was a band fastened at the front. Hair was allowed to grow longer again, and the style included a pointed or square-shaped beard paired with an accentuated moustache. Large and small ruffs encircled the[152] neck, and a flat, fan-shaped collar was common in the earlier years.

Plate XIV.
Plate 14.
- (a) Embroidered Silk Dress with Pannier. 1765-80. Pattern of bodice, p. 322.
- (b) Brocade Dress and Quilted Petticoat. 1750-65.

Fig. 60.—Costumes. Period James I.
Fig. 60.—Costumes. James I Era.
The jerkin was close fitting and the length of the waist more normal, with less tendency to being tightened in, and not so deep in the front point, so as to set better over the very full trunks or breeches. The square tabs of the jerkin increased in size, and soon formed large flaps divided into three or four, to the centre of the back. Sleeves were fairly tight and started from slightly larger epaulets, and were usually set at the wrist, either with a small ruff or turned-up lawn cuff, edged with lace.
The jerkin fit closely and had a more average waist length, showing less tendency to be cinched in and with a shallower front point, allowing it to sit better over the fuller trunks or breeches. The square tabs of the jerkin grew larger, eventually creating big flaps divided into three or four sections at the center of the back. The sleeves were fairly fitted, starting from slightly bigger epaulets, and were typically fastened at the wrist with either a small ruff or a turned-up lawn cuff, trimmed with lace.
The trunks were padded in a very full shape and were much longer, just above the knee. Also full padded-out breeches tapering to the knee or just above, where a large tie and bow hung at the side, and full square breeches not tied in, are also a feature of these days, usually banded with wide braids at ends and sides. Upright pockets were made on either side towards the front, about two inches from the side seams. They fastened up the front in a pleated fold, many being decorated with punched, pricked, or slashed design of a smallish character.
The trunks were well-padded and much longer, hitting just above the knee. There were also padded breeches that tapered to the knee or just above, where a large tie and bow hung at the side, as well as full square breeches that weren’t tied in. These were common styles of the time, often embellished with wide braids at the ends and sides. There were upright pockets on either side towards the front, about two inches from the side seams. They fastened at the front with pleats, many adorned with small punched, pricked, or slashed designs.

Fig. 61.—Shapes of Shoes from 1590-1650.
Fig. 61.—Styles of Shoes from 1590-1650.
Cloaks were worn longer to the knee,[154] retaining the same shapes and braid decoration as in the Elizabethan period, and hanging sleeves were still worn on them, as well as on some of the jerkins.
Cloaks were worn longer, reaching the knee,[154] still keeping the same shapes and braid decoration as in the Elizabethan era, and hanging sleeves were still worn with them, as well as on some of the jerkins.
Shoes became fuller and rounder at the toes, mostly with thick welted soles and short heels, or none. They were fastened with a large rosette of gold lace or ribbon on the front, and the latchets were set back to show an open side. The top-boots were close fitting and took squarer toes; the spur flap being rather small. Beautifully embroidered clocks are seen on the tights and stockings of this period.
Shoes started to have a fuller and rounder toe shape, usually featuring thick soles and short heels, or none at all. They were secured with a large decorative piece made of gold lace or ribbon at the front, and the straps were positioned to reveal an open side. The top-boots were snug and had a squared-off toe, with a rather small flap for the spurs. Beautifully embroidered patterns can be seen on the tights and stockings from this time.
SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. CHARLES I. FEMALE.
The hair was now allowed to fall in ringlets round the back and sides, with a few flat curls on the brow, and a bow and pearls were caught in at the sides. Short feathers may also be noted in use. A plait was often coiled at the back after 1630.
The hair was now styled in ringlets around the back and sides, with a few flat curls on the forehead, and a bow and pearls were added at the sides. Short feathers were also common. A braid was often twisted and tucked at the back after 1630.

Plate XV.
Plate 15.
- (a) White Cloth Coat. 1775-90.
- (b) Silk Dress. 1740-60.
- (c) Embroidered Velvet Coat. 1755-75.

Fig. 62.
Fig. 62.

Fig. 63.
Collar and Bodice types. Period Charles I.
Fig. 63.
Collar and Bodice styles. Charles I Era.

Fig. 64.
Collar and Bodice types. Period Charles I to 1660.
Fig. 64.
Collar and Bodice styles. Period Charles I to 1660.
In the early part of this reign the ladies were wearing the long corset-bodice, with a richly decorated stomacher which curved outwards to set on the very full skirts; this often finished with a curved or foliated[158] shape at the point. Square starched collars, rounded at the back, sometimes set up at the back of the neck or flat on the shoulder, and ruffs were still seen round the neck with collars as well, but they were seldom met with after 1635. A plainer, deep collar, flat, round, or V-shaped at the back, coming well over the shoulders, was caught together by a bow or ornament in front. About 1630 shorter waisted bodices came in, with full, loose sleeves set in epaulets: the neck shape was rounded or square. The bodices were often slashed, and the full sleeves, cut into bands, were sometimes gathered by cross bands from one to three times. Full plain sleeves, opened in the front seam, were also clasped at the elbow in a like manner. Outer short sleeves became a feature, opening in the front, showing the full under one or a tight one; the waist became very short and its tabs larger. A waistband fastened in the stomacher with a bow either side and bows with long gold tags decorated the waist as in the male jerkin. The skirt decorated by a band of ornament down the front was often tied upon the corset-bodice, the front point being left outside. Shoes of the same shape as the male illustrations,[160] with very square toes, were frequent, but an oval toe, rather pointed, is seen in many pictures, with the large lace rosettes in front. Muffs are first noticed in these days, though they were seen much earlier on the Continent.
In the early part of this reign, women were wearing long corset bodices with a richly decorated stomacher that curved outward to support the very full skirts, often finishing with a curved or leaf-like shape at the point. Square starched collars, rounded at the back, were sometimes worn up at the back of the neck or flat on the shoulder, and ruffs were still common around the neck along with collars, though these became rare after 1635. A simpler, deep collar, flat and round or V-shaped at the back, came down well over the shoulders, and was held together in front by a bow or ornament. Around 1630, shorter waisted bodices became popular, featuring full, loose sleeves set in epaulets, with necklines that were either rounded or square. The bodices were often slashed, and the full sleeves, cut into bands, could be gathered by cross bands one to three times. Full plain sleeves that opened at the front seam were also clasped at the elbow in a similar style. Outer short sleeves became a characteristic detail, opening in the front to show the full under sleeve or a tighter one; the waist became very short, and its tabs grew larger. A waistband fastened at the stomacher with a bow on either side, and bows with long gold tags decorated the waist, similar to the male jerkin. The skirt, adorned with a band of ornament down the front, was often tied to the corset bodice, leaving the front point exposed. Shoes, resembling the style in male illustrations, had very square toes, but an oval toe that was somewhat pointed appeared in many pictures, often featuring large lace rosettes in front. Muffs first appeared during this time, although they had been seen much earlier on the Continent.

Fig. 65.—Period 1625-1660.
Fig. 65.—Period 1625-1660.
SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. CHARLES I. MALE.
The hair was worn loose to the shoulders, and a small plait was sometimes arranged on the left side, brought to the front of shoulder. The beard was trimmed to a pointed shape, and smarter curled moustaches were fashionable. Hats were still high in the crown, but rather lower than with James I; the large brims were turned about in various curves, and feathers were worn falling over the brims to the side or back.
The hair was styled loose to the shoulders, with a small braid occasionally arranged on the left side, brought to the front. The beard was trimmed to a pointed shape, and stylish curled mustaches were in vogue. Hats were still tall in the crown, but a bit shorter than during James I's time; the large brims were shaped in various curves, and feathers were worn draping over the brims to the side or back.
The jerkin was high in the collar, supporting a large, square, turn-down collar edged with pointed lace to the shoulders, or a small, plain, turn-over collar; ruffs are very rarely seen after 1630.
The jerkin had a high collar, featuring a large, square, fold-down collar trimmed with pointed lace to the shoulders, or a small, simple, fold-over collar; ruffs were rarely seen after 1630.

Fig. 66.—Charles I.
Fig. 66.—Charles I.

Fig. 67.—Period 1625-1660.
Fig. 67.—Period 1625-1660.

Fig. 68.—Period 1625-1660.
Fig. 68.—Period 1625-1660.
A rather short waist grew shorter during this reign, with much larger tabs, or large flaps laced to the body, forming a series of bows with long gilt tags round the waist.[164] The body is usually decorated with long slashes from the shoulders to the breast, or the full length, and a long slashed opening is often seen in the back (presumably to give more play to the sword-thrust). The sleeve is also treated in the same way to the elbow or waist. All sleeves start from a stiff epaulet. Breeches are both very full and fairly tight, the latter edged with a purfling of silk or gold lace as well as the sides, the former shape tied either above or below the knee with a large silk bow with falling ends. They were held up by a number of hooks, fastening to a small flap with eyelets, round the inside of the doublet (see pattern 11, p. 295), and were buttoned down the front, the buttons being half hidden in a pleat. The pockets were placed vertically in the front of the thigh, and were frequently of a decorative character.
A rather short waist became even shorter during this period, featuring much larger tabs or flaps laced to the body, creating a series of bows with long gilt tags around the waist.[164] The bodice is usually decorated with long slashes from the shoulders to the chest, or down the full length, and there’s often a long slashed opening in the back (presumably to allow more movement for the sword). The sleeves are also styled this way down to the elbow or waist. All sleeves start from a stiff epaulet. Breeches are both very full and fairly tight, with the latter finished with a trim of silk or gold lace along the edges, and the fuller style tied either above or below the knee with a large silk bow that has falling ends. They were held up by several hooks that attached to a small flap with eyelets on the inside of the doublet (see pattern 11, p. 295), and were buttoned down the front, with the buttons partially hidden in a pleat. The pockets were positioned vertically on the front of the thigh, and they were often decorative.
A short or long circular cloak was worn, and a coat-cloak with opened sleeves is an interesting garment. These coverings were hung in various ways from the shoulders by methods of tying the cords across the body.
A short or long circular cloak was worn, and a coat-cloak with open sleeves is an interesting garment. These coverings were draped in different ways from the shoulders by tying the cords across the body.

Fig. 69.—Period 1625-1660.
Fig. 69.—Period 1625-1660.

Fig. 70.—Shoe shapes. Charles I to 1700.
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 23. Charles I.
Nos. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 25. Charles II.
Nos. 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 26, 27, 28. James II and William and Mary.
Fig. 70.—Shoe styles. Charles I to 1700.
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 23. Charles I.
Nos. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 25. Charles II.
Nos. 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 26, 27, 28. James II and William and Mary.

Plate XVI.
Plate 16.

Fig. 71.—Boot shapes. Charles I to 1700.
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Charles I.
Nos. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15. Charles II.
Nos. 16, 17, 18. James II and William and Mary.
Fig. 71.—Boot shapes. Charles I to 1700.
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Charles I.
Nos. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15. Charles II.
Nos. 16, 17, 18. James II and William and Mary.
Shoes became very square at the toes, or blocked as in Fig. 70, No. 6. The fronts[168] were set with large rosettes of silk and silver or gold lace, the heels varied much in height, that mostly favoured being a large, low heel. A quaint fashion of shoe combined with a clog sole was an interesting shape (see illustration of clogs, p. 106). Fairly tight top-boots, coming well above the knee, were often turned down. Other boots with large bell-tops, turned over or pushed down, were covered or filled with a lace or bell-shaped stocking-top. A sash was worn round the waist or across the body over the left shoulder (the length and width of these is given in the description of patterns, p. 279). A broad belt, or sword-hanger, came across the right shoulder. Gloves were beautifully embroidered in gold, pearls, or coloured silks, the gauntlets being from five to eight inches deep.
Shoes became very square at the toes, or blocked as in Fig. 70, No. 6. The fronts[168] were adorned with large rosettes of silk and silver or gold lace, and the heels varied greatly in height, but mostly favored being a large, low heel. A quirky style of shoe that combined with a clog sole had an interesting shape (see illustration of clogs, p. 106). Fairly tight top-boots, rising well above the knee, were often turned down. Other boots with large bell-tops, either turned over or pushed down, were covered or filled with a lace or bell-shaped stocking-top. A sash was worn around the waist or across the body over the left shoulder (the length and width of these is given in the description of patterns, p. 279). A broad belt, or sword-hanger, crossed over the right shoulder. Gloves were beautifully embroidered with gold, pearls, or colored silks, with the gauntlets measuring five to eight inches deep.
SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. THE COMMONWEALTH. MALE AND FEMALE.
The same shapes apply to costume during the Commonwealth, though a sterner effect was given by the choice of plain decoration and less colour. A small or a large plain collar, and the disappearance of slashings[169] on the coat, and a longer skirt became noticeable. A very high tapered hat, with stiff circular brim, was worn by the Puritans, and little, close, black hoods were much favoured. A general reaction from gay extravagance set in.
The same styles were seen in clothing during the Commonwealth, but a stricter look emerged due to simpler decorations and fewer colors. A small or large plain collar appeared, slashings[169] on coats faded out, and longer skirts became common. Puritans wore very tall, tapered hats with stiff circular brims, and small, fitted black hoods were quite popular. A broad shift away from vibrant extravagance took place.
SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. CHARLES II. FEMALE.
The hair was set out from the head on combs with falling ringlets, and several small flat ringlets were placed on the forehead. The back of the hair was plaited into a knot, and pearl strings were interlaced, or ribbon loops caught in at either side. Toward 1680 the hair was worn tightly curled and fulled out into a round shape with a curl or two falling on the front of the shoulders; small feathers or long feathers were also worn. Hats were of a similar shape to those of the last reign, with a stiffer and narrower curved brim; but the chief head-dress was a large hood faced with another material, which latter was tied under the chin; these mostly formed part of a cape also.
The hair was styled with combs, featuring loose ringlets, and several small flat ringlets were placed on the forehead. The back of the hair was braided into a knot, with pearl strings woven through or ribbon loops pinned at either side. Around 1680, hair was worn tightly curled and puffed out into a round shape, with one or two curls falling in front of the shoulders; small feathers or long feathers were also added. Hats were similar in shape to those from the previous reign but had a stiffer and narrower curved brim; however, the main headpiece was a large hood made from a different material, which was tied under the chin and often part of a cape as well.

Fig. 72.—Period 1650-1685.
Fig. 72.—Era 1650-1685.

Plate XVII.
Plate 17.
- (a) Silk Suit. 1765-80.
- (b) Quilted Dress. 1700-25.
- (c) Silk-embroidered Suit. 1765-80.

Fig. 73.
1, 2, 3, 4.—Back and Front of two Corset Bodices. Period Charles II.
5, 6.—Two Corsets. Period Charles II.
7, 8.—Two Bodice types. Period Charles I.
Fig. 73.
1, 2, 3, 4.—Back and Front of two Corset Bodices. Charles II era.
5, 6.—Two Corsets. Charles II era.
7, 8.—Two Bodice styles. Charles I era.
The bodice again became much longer and of a pointed shape, but many corset bodices took a round point, and a round[172] neck coming well off the shoulders became general, usually decorated with a plain wide band of lace. Ruffs and collars were no longer seen amongst the upper classes. Very full sleeves and large opened sleeves were tied or clasped over full lawn ones, and at times separated from the shoulders, being caught effectively with jewels. Groups of ribbons were placed at the breast or point of the bodice, and the ends of sleeves or shoulders, besides at the fronts of the outer skirt when divided, also in the gathering of the lawn sleeves. Stomachers were not much worn, but a drape of soft silk was caught here and there round the neck of bodice, and large draperies were clasped to the shoulders. Loose robes and robes shaped to the figure, opening down the front from the neck even to the waist, with a clasp or several holding them together; these were worn over a quilted linen corset laced in front as in the illustration, but the bodice was often formed on a corset. Long gloves and mittens were in use, and small muffs with ribbon loops on the front were carried. High-heeled shoes with very long square toes were affected in imitation of the male shoe, but most ladies now began to wear a very pointed shoe.[173]
The bodice became longer and pointed again, but many corset bodices had a rounded point, with a round[172] neckline that sat well off the shoulders, usually adorned with a simple wide band of lace. Ruffs and collars fell out of fashion among the upper classes. Very full sleeves and large open sleeves were tied or clasped over full lawn ones and sometimes separated from the shoulders, fastened with jewels. Ribbons were grouped at the breast or point of the bodice, as well as at the ends of sleeves or shoulders, and also at the front of the outer skirt when it was split, in addition to the gathering of the lawn sleeves. Stomachers weren’t commonly worn, but a soft silk drape was occasionally gathered around the neckline of the bodice, and large draperies were clasped at the shoulders. Loose robes and figure-hugging robes were worn, opening down the front from the neck to the waist, secured with a clasp or several fasteners; these were worn over a quilted linen corset laced at the front as shown in the illustration, though the bodice was often designed on a corset. Long gloves and mittens were in style, and small muffs with ribbon loops at the front were carried. High-heeled shoes with very long square toes were trendy in imitation of men's shoes, but most ladies began to wear very pointed shoes.[173]

Fig. 74.—Sleeve treatments. Period Charles II.
Fig. 74.—Sleeve treatments. Charles II era.
SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. CHARLES II. MALE.
Long hair or wigs of long curls falling on the shoulders, a very narrow moustache and point of beard on the chin came with this reign. Lace collars of a smaller square or rounded shape were in use, but a fall of lace pleated in the centre soon took its place. High-crowned hats with a band and bow in front and a flat, waved, or curved brim, with feathers on either side or all round, were the fashion, the crowns becoming shorter during the reign; the fronts and sometimes the sides of the brim are seen turned up, and so begins to form the three-cornered hat, which remained so long a feature in history.
Long hair or wigs with long curls draping over the shoulders, along with a very thin mustache and a pointed beard on the chin, were in style during this period. Lace collars with a smaller square or rounded shape were popular, but soon a pleated lace ruffle took over. High-crowned hats featuring a band and bow in front, along with flat, waved, or curved brims decorated with feathers on the sides or all around, were the trend. The crowns started to get shorter throughout the period; the fronts and sometimes the sides of the brims would be turned up, marking the beginning of the three-cornered hat, which would be a significant style for many years.

Fig. 75.—Period Charles II.
Fig. 75.—Charles II Era.
We find with extravagant shapes a happy return of gay colours. The high-waisted jerkins of the Charles I period were now seen without the skirt (as very short jackets), leaving the lawn shirt to show between this and the breeches, besides which the jackets were nearly always left unbuttoned several inches up, some being cut away in a rounded shape and also having short sleeves. The lower arm was[176] covered with a full lawn sleeve caught at two or even three distances with a loop of ribbons or bows, and finishing with a wide lace frill; a bunch of ribbon loops was also often seen on the right shoulder. A long circular cloak, with turned-back fronts forming a collar in many, still retained the hanging sleeve, and was mostly decorated with bands of heavy braid. A long square coat also came in about 1666, buttoned right down the front, with pockets set very low in the skirt, and large narrow cuffs opened at the back as in Plate VIII (see p. 90).
We see bright colors make a happy return alongside extravagant styles. The high-waisted jackets from the Charles I era were now worn as very short jackets, with the lawn shirt visible between the jacket and the breeches. These jackets were often left unbuttoned several inches up, some featuring a rounded cut and short sleeves. The lower arms were covered with a full lawn sleeve that was gathered at two or even three points with ribbon loops or bows, finished off with a wide lace frill. A bunch of ribbon loops was often seen on the right shoulder. A long circular cloak, with turned-back fronts creating a collar for many styles, still had the draping sleeves and was mostly decorated with heavy braid bands. A long square coat also emerged around 1666, buttoned all the way down the front, featuring low pockets in the skirt and large narrow cuffs that opened at the back, as shown in Plate VIII (see p. 90).
Very full breeches were worn to just about the knee or shorter, with a fringe of ribbon loops, and a row or several rows of the same were arranged at the waist. A short petticoat just showed the under breeches, many of which were turned into a doublet shape by an additional piece looped up loosely from the knee with a silk filling; the ribbon loops at the waist were repeated up the sides of the petticoat. Silk garters were worn with bows on both sides of the leg, or a deep lace fall came from the end of the breeches to the middle of the calf; a lace setting also filled the wide top of the boots, which was worn very low, even to the ankles. These short[178] bell-topped boots were favoured, with high heels and very square toes. Shoes were long and square (or duck-billed) at the toes; and had a high narrow front to the instep, and latchets fastened with a stiffened butterfly bow, besides, at times, a rosette lower down on the front: red heels were in evidence. The sword-band was very wide, and many were decorated with gold embroidery.
Very full pants were worn to about the knee or shorter, with a fringe of ribbon loops, and a row or several rows of the same were arranged at the waist. A short petticoat just showed the under pants, many of which were styled like a doublet by an extra piece looped up loosely from the knee with a silk filling; the ribbon loops at the waist were repeated up the sides of the petticoat. Silk garters were worn with bows on both sides of the leg, or a deep lace fall came from the end of the pants to the middle of the calf; a lace setting also filled the wide top of the boots, which were worn very low, even to the ankles. These short[178] bell-topped boots were preferred, with high heels and very square toes. Shoes were long and square (or duck-billed) at the toes; they had a high narrow front to the instep, and fastened with a stiffened butterfly bow, in addition to sometimes having a rosette lower down on the front: red heels were noticeable. The sword belt was very wide, and many were decorated with gold embroidery.

Fig. 76.—Costume types. Period Charles II.
Fig. 76.—Costume styles. Era of Charles II.
SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. JAMES II. FEMALE.
The hair was still worn full at the sides over a comb, as in the former reign, with curls dropping to the shoulders, but they now began to discard the set-out comb and the little flat curls on the forehead, the hair being of a round shape or parted from the centre and mounted higher and narrower on the head, in the latter part of this reign. The same large hoods and drapes continued in use, and a high goffered head-dress with set-out front began to appear; the same shaped bodice with round low neck showing the shoulders, often set with a stomacher front or jewelled in that form, and smaller decorations of ribbon loops were still favoured. A smaller and[180] shorter sleeve began to appear with a turned-up cuff, and the gathered-in lawn sleeves and ruffles caught here and there with pearls or clasps as before, besides the same light drapery clasped about the breast front. The overskirt was now looped back, the points being held together, giving a wide display of the underskirt, which was heavily banded or had a jewel setting down the front. Other train skirts, also divided in front, were bordered with drawn silk caught at intervals into long puffs. Very small muffs were the fashion. Shoes increased their pointed shape and rather large heels are to be noted, but some shoes assumed a very narrow square toe; they were either tied from small latchets with a bow, or with buckled latchets. Longer gloves were worn, and large full cloaks with hoods or large drapery wraps when required for outdoor wear.
Hair was still styled full at the sides over a comb, like in the previous reign, with curls falling to the shoulders. However, they began to move away from the flat comb and the small curls on the forehead, opting for a more rounded shape or a center part, with hair mounted higher and narrower on the head later in this reign. The same large hoods and drapes were still in style, and a high goffered headpiece with a set-out front began to become popular. The bodice remained the same, featuring a round low neck that exposed the shoulders, often adorned with a stomacher or jewels, along with smaller ribbon loop decorations. Sleeves became smaller and shorter, featuring turned-up cuffs, while gathered lawn sleeves and ruffles were still embellished with pearls or clasps, along with the same light drapery gathered at the front. The overskirt was now looped back, holding together at the points to reveal a wide display of the underskirt, which was heavily banded or set with jewels down the front. Other train skirts, also split at the front, were bordered with drawn silk, which was gathered into puffs at intervals. Very small muffs were the trend. Shoes became more pointed and featured larger heels, although some shoes had a very narrow square toe; they were typically laced with small ties and a bow, or had buckled straps. Longer gloves were worn, along with large, full cloaks with hoods or large draped wraps for outdoor occasions.

Fig. 77.—Costume notes. Period 1670-1690.
Fig. 77.—Outfit notes. Era 1670-1690.
SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. JAMES II. MALE.
The same long wig was worn as in the last reign, but the curls were more of a set ringlet type, and embroidered caps were worn when these were taken off. The face was now clean shaven until the 19th[182] century. Hats also of the older character were retained, but the turned-up three-cornered shape, filled with short feathers, became more settled in fashion, and they were heavily banded with gold braid or lace on the edge.
The same long wig was worn as in the previous reign, but the curls were now styled in tight ringlets, and embroidered caps were worn when the wigs were removed. The face was clean-shaven until the 19th[182] century. Hats from the older style were still in fashion, but the turned-up three-cornered shape, adorned with short feathers, became more established, and they were heavily decorated with gold braid or lace along the edges.

Fig. 78.—Period 1690-1700.
Fig. 78.—Period 1690-1700.
A smart bow was worn crosswise over the folded lace fall at the neck. The coat was a very long square shape to the knees, the stiff skirt often set out over rather full breeches, which were sometimes "shorts," and just above the knee, the stocking being often brought up above the knee, with a garter just below. The sleeves were short, above or below the elbow, with a turned-up cuff, leaving the full-gathered lawn sleeve with a lace ruffle to show at the wrist. A sash encircled the waist, and often shut in the sword-belt, which hung from the right shoulder. The coat had buttons from the neck to the bottom of the skirt, though the lower buttons were seldom fastened; the sides of the skirt were opened up about 11 inches, and also the back seam to the same height; most seams were heavily decorated with gold, silver braid, or lace, and the pockets were placed rather low down towards the front of the skirt, and were sometimes set vertically.
A stylish bow was worn across the folded lace at the neck. The coat was very long and square-shaped, reaching the knees, with a stiff skirt that often flared out over somewhat puffy breeches, which were sometimes "shorts" that ended just above the knee. Stockings usually went up above the knee, held in place with a garter just below. The sleeves were short, either above or below the elbow, with a turned-up cuff, allowing the full gathered lawn sleeve with a lace ruffle to show at the wrist. A sash wrapped around the waist, often securing the sword-belt that hung from the right shoulder. The coat had buttons running from the neck down to the bottom of the skirt, although the lower buttons were rarely fastened; the sides of the skirt were opened up about 11 inches, and the back seam was opened to the same height. Most seams were richly decorated with gold or silver braid, or lace, and the pockets were positioned fairly low down towards the front of the skirt, sometimes set vertically.

Plate XVIII.
Plate 18.
- (a) Brocade Bodice. 1770-85.
- (b) Flowered Silk Dress. 1750-70.
- (c) Silk Brocade Bodice. 1780-95.

Fig. 79.—Period 1688-1702.
Fig. 79.—Period 1688-1702.
[184]Long round capes were still worn, without sleeves, and a collar turned down about 4 inches.
[184]People still wore long, round capes without sleeves, featuring a collar that was turned down about 4 inches.
Shoes of a similar shape to those of the later Charles II type were in use, but the heels became larger and the toes not so long; the top of the front was sometimes shaped and turned down. Heavy boots to the knee, with large curved tops, were also in favour, as in the illustration (Fig. 71).
Shoes with a shape similar to those from the later Charles II style were common, but the heels got bigger and the toes were shorter; the front sometimes had a shaped and turned-down design. Knee-high heavy boots with large curved tops were also popular, as shown in the illustration (Fig. 71).
SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. WILLIAM AND MARY. FEMALE.
The hair was now mounted high on top and the front parted with two curls, the rest of the hair being bound on top, or a curl was arranged on either shoulder. A goffered frill head-dress, set on a cap, rose very high, and a long fall of lace, or lappets, came down on either side from the cap, or was gathered in like a small hood at the back. Bare shoulders now began to disappear, the bodice shape coming over the shoulder to a V shape enclosing a stomacher, which was sometimes tabbed or shaped at the point. Many dresses were made in one length, caught together at the waist with a band; the fronts of[185] these skirts were looped back high up, creating a pannier-like fullness at the hips, and narrow hoops came in to set out the skirts, many of which were heavily embroidered with gold. The Watteau-back dress started in this reign; a very early specimen, at the Victoria and Albert Museum, is most probably of this time (Fig. 85, A). The sleeves worn to the elbow increased in width from the shoulder, and were set with large narrow cuffs gathered with a jewel or bow on the front[186] of the arm. Hoods and cloaks of the same character as described for the last reign continued, and light sticks were carried by the ladies. Very pointed shoes were worn, with large high heels, the top of the front flap in some being shaped into points. Black masks were frequently used, some having long lace falls. Rather small muffs were still the fashion, and beautifully decorated short aprons became a feature with the dress.
The hair was now styled high on top with the front parted into two curls, while the rest was pinned up. Curls were arranged on either shoulder. A frilled headpiece, set on a cap, rose high, and long lace or lappets draped down on either side from the cap, or gathered like a small hood at the back. Bare shoulders were starting to fade away, as the bodice began to cover the shoulders in a V shape around a stomacher, which was sometimes pointed or shaped at the tip. Many dresses were made in one piece, gathered at the waist with a band; the fronts of these skirts were looped back high, creating a pannier-like fullness at the hips, while narrow hoops were added to support the skirts, many of which were heavily embroidered with gold. The Watteau-back dress emerged during this period; the earliest example at the Victoria and Albert Museum likely dates from this time (Fig. 85, A). Sleeves that reached to the elbow widened from the shoulder and featured large narrow cuffs gathered with a jewel or bow at the front of the arm. Hoods and cloaks similar to those described for the previous reign persisted, and ladies carried light sticks. Very pointy shoes with large high heels were worn, some with the front flap shaped into points. Black masks were often used, with some featuring long lace drops. Small muffs remained in fashion, and beautifully decorated short aprons became a staple of the dress.

Fig. 80.—1688-1698.
Fig. 80.—1688-1698.
SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. WILLIAM AND MARY. MALE.
Wigs of the same long character continued, and were parted in the centre with a raised effect, and variously shaped caps, with turned-up fold or brim, were worn when the wig was taken off.
Wigs of the same long style remained popular, parted in the center with a voluminous look, while variously shaped caps with turned-up edges or brims were worn when the wig was removed.
The beaver or felt hat, turned up three-cornerwise, was now in general use. It is often seen with the brims loose, or sometimes down, especially amongst the lower classes. Both small shapes and large were worn.
The beaver or felt hat, with its three-pointed turn-up, was now widely used. It's often seen with the brims loose, or sometimes down, especially among the lower classes. Both small and large styles were worn.

Plate XIX.
Plate 19.

Fig. 81.—Period 1680-1690.
Fig. 81.—Era 1680-1690.
Black ties across formal lace cravats, and long lawn cravats, edged with lace, one end of which was sometimes caught[188] up loosely through the large buttonhole of the coat were worn. Waistcoats were left open well down to the waist; some of these were nearly of the same length as the coat, the skirt being often edged with deep gold fringe.
Black ties over formal lace cravats and long lawn cravats, trimmed with lace, with one end sometimes loosely pulled through the large buttonhole of the coat, were worn. Waistcoats were left open down to the waist; some of these were almost as long as the coat, with the skirt often edged with deep gold fringe.
The coats were of much the same character as in the time of James II, with buttons all down the front, but now it was the mode to button coats just at the waist, allowing the waistcoat to be shown. The sleeves were generally longer, to the middle of the forearm, and the turned-back cuffs became very large and deep, often towards the end of the reign taking a curved shape. The seams, fronts, and pockets were frequently braided as before. A long square waistcoat of rich brocade or embroidered material, about four inches shorter than the coat, was worn; some of these had tight sleeves, which came to the wrist beneath the outer coat-sleeve; otherwise a gathered lawn sleeve with ruffle was worn.
The coats were pretty similar to those worn during the time of James II, featuring buttons down the front, but now it was fashionable to fasten coats only at the waist, revealing the waistcoat underneath. The sleeves were generally longer, reaching the middle of the forearm, and the turned-back cuffs became very large and deep, often developing a curved shape towards the end of the reign. The seams, fronts, and pockets were frequently braided like before. A long, square waistcoat made of rich brocade or embroidered fabric, about four inches shorter than the coat, was worn; some of these had tight sleeves that reached the wrist under the outer coat-sleeve; otherwise, a gathered lawn sleeve with a ruffle was worn.
Shoes and boots were practically the same as in the previous reign, with larger high heels and a high square front, with latchets buckled or stiffly tied, and very square toes. Top-boots of the same heavy character continued as in Plate II (see[189] p. 42). Stockings continued to be worn frequently above the knee outside the breeches, with a garter beneath, and beautifully embroidered clocks to the calf. Muffs were carried by many men, and the gauntlets of gloves had a very angular shape. Patches and make-up were used by the dandies, and the sword was now carried through the side pleats on a waist-belt sometimes worn outside the waistcoat.
Shoes and boots were pretty much the same as in the previous era, featuring larger high heels and a high square front, with buckled latchets or stiff ties, and very square toes. Top-boots of the same heavy style continued as shown in Plate II (see[189] p. 42). Stockings were still commonly worn above the knee over the breeches, secured with a garter beneath, and had beautifully embroidered designs on the calf. Many men carried muffs, and the gauntlets of gloves had a very angular shape. Dandies used patches and makeup, and swords were now carried through the side pleats on a waist-belt sometimes worn over the waistcoat.
CHAPTER VII[190]
THE CHARACTER OF DECORATION AND TRIMMINGS OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
In the early part to the middle of this century the trimmings were chiefly of gold or silver lace, real lace, and purfled silk, mostly of the same material as the dress: a bow was often worn on the breast, and also in the front of the sleeve cuff. Purfled or ruched trimming generally ran down the front of the dress from the neck to the hem of the skirt in the Second Georgian dress, and gathered borders or decorations of curved forms were in use. The skirts usually had only one flounce till the reign of George III, when the trimmings became more elaborate, and gauze and imitation flowers were festooned upon the skirts, with ribbons and tassels and padded designs standing out in strong[191] relief; some charming gimp trimmings are also seen.
In the early to mid-20th century, the embellishments were mainly made of gold or silver lace, real lace, and silk trim, usually matching the dress material. Often, a bow was worn on the chest and also on the front of the sleeve cuff. Trim that was either purfled or ruched typically ran down the front of the dress from the neckline to the hem of the skirt in the Second Georgian style, and gathered borders or decorative curves were common. Skirts usually had just one flounce until the reign of George III, when the trimmings became more intricate, featuring gauze and faux flowers draped across the skirts, with ribbons, tassels, and padded designs standing out prominently; some lovely gimp trimmings were also seen.
The lace ruffles of a fan shape which finished the earlier sleeves till about 1745 were sometimes of lace, interwoven with gold, silver, and coloured silk needlework, and this was no doubt the forerunner of the use of the more solid material itself. The setting of the sleeve finish is interesting to note all through this period, for it was beautifully treated in balancing the effect of the dress. The square cuff with the deep lace fall was big in style, and the later closely-fitted elbow piece, richly gathered, was happily conceived, but no finer setting could have been applied to the sack-back dress than the large fan or double fan with its lace fall. The edges of the early fan-finished sleeves were of curved and scalloped forms, the latter shaping often being seen in the later sleeves.
The lace ruffles of a fan shape that finished the earlier sleeves until about 1745 were sometimes made of lace, interwoven with gold, silver, and colored silk embroidery, and this was undoubtedly a precursor to using the more solid material itself. The design of the sleeve finish is interesting to note throughout this period, as it was beautifully crafted to balance the effect of the dress. The square cuff with the deep lace drape was a significant style, and the later closely-fitted elbow piece, richly gathered, was well thought out, but nothing could have complemented the sack-back dress better than the large fan or double fan with its lace drape. The edges of the early fan-finished sleeves had curved and scalloped forms, with the latter shape often appearing in the later sleeves.
With George III we notice designs in straw work, decorations of imitation flowers in ribbon-work and various materials, and much taste in the choice of colour schemes, while the tassels of this period were delightful creations. The designs of stuffs at the early part of the[192] century were generally of fine strong colour blends, but in the middle period there was much questionable taste displayed in the heavy massing of patterns, but this soon improved with the striped character crossed by running flowers which was quite ideal in type for costume keeping, grace, and lightness, with a beautiful interchange of colour.
With George III, we see designs in straw work, decorations made from fake flowers in ribbon work and various materials, and a lot of care in the choice of color schemes. The tassels from this period were wonderfully crafted. The designs of fabrics in the early part of the[192] century typically featured strong color combinations, but in the middle period, there was a lot of questionable taste in the heavy layering of patterns. However, this soon improved with striped designs interspersed with running flowers, which were ideal for costumes, offering elegance and lightness, along with a beautiful mix of colors.
The quilted silk and satin petticoats are a special feature to note in these times; many simple and effective designs were in use, and they added much glitter to the scheme. Aprons were also beautiful examples of needlework, and were worn with the best of dresses to the middle of the century; the earlier ones generally had a scalloped edging, and many had pockets; gold lace edging or fringe was often used in the time of George II, and they were all finely decorated with needlework in gold, silver, or coloured silks. The white aprons were also of consummate needlecraft, and hanging pockets worn at the sides were also a decorated feature, but these only showed when the dress was worn tucked up. The later style of dress became much simpler, consisting chiefly of gathered flounce settings, fichus, and large[193] mob caps; these were often daintily embroidered with tambour work and large bow and sash settings, making delightful costumes.
The quilted silk and satin petticoats are something to admire these days; many simple but effective designs were popular, adding a lot of shine to the overall look. Aprons were also beautiful examples of craftsmanship, worn with the best dresses until the middle of the century; the earlier ones usually had scalloped edges and many had pockets. Gold lace edging or fringe was commonly used during the time of George II, and they were all beautifully decorated with embroidery in gold, silver, or colored silks. The white aprons were also masterpieces of needlework, and the hanging pockets worn at the sides were another decorative element, but these only showed when the dress was worn up. The later style of dress became much simpler, mainly featuring gathered flounces, fichus, and large[193] mob caps; these were often delicately embroidered with tambour work and adorned with large bows and sashes, creating delightful outfits.
Bags, muffs, gloves, and shoes were all chosen for the display of needlecraft, while artists and jewellers used all their skill on the fans, patch-boxes, and étuis, and even the dress materials were often painted by hand, while many painted Chinese silks were also utilised.
Bags, muffs, gloves, and shoes were all selected for the showcase of needlework, while artists and jewelers applied all their skill to the fans, patch boxes, and cases, and even the fabrics were often hand-painted, along with many painted Chinese silks that were also used.
EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. ANNE. FEMALE.
The hair was dressed in a simple manner, with two curls parted from the centre of the forehead, and curved inwards on the brow. A loose ringlet or two were brought on to the left shoulder, the rest being gathered into a back-knot. Feathers or flowers were arranged on top, generally with a pair of lace lappets falling to the back; these also adorned the cap, which still bore the front goffered frills set out as in the last reign, but these were diminished in size and were mostly of one row. We note probably the last stage of this style appearing in a print of Hogarth's, dated 1740.
The hair was styled simply, with two curls separated from the center of the forehead and curled inwards on the brow. A loose ringlet or two were draped over the left shoulder, while the rest was gathered into a back knot. Feathers or flowers were placed on top, usually paired with lace lappets that fell to the back; these also decorated the cap, which still had the front frills arranged as in the last reign, but these were smaller and mostly in a single row. We might be looking at the last stage of this style, as seen in a print by Hogarth, dated 1740.

Fig. 82.—Bodice types. Period 1690-1720.
Fig. 82.—Bodice styles. Era 1690-1720.

Fig. 83.—Costume type. 1695-1710.
Fig. 83.—Costume style. 1695-1710.
[196]Hoods and capes or cloaks, and long black fichus or wraps, were the chief coverings, as the head-dress did not allow of hats being worn, but with the small frilled caps a little straw hat, or a low-crowned felt with a largish brim, are seen, and a small lace frill round the neck began to appear. Bodices with a low curved neck often had a short skirt or shaped pieces, as well as a shaped short sleeve over a gathered lawn one, while many wore long sleeves to the wrist, and a waistbelt is sometimes noted. There was also the sleeve spreading in width to the elbow, with a turned-up square cuff. The front of the bodice may be remarked with bands fastening across, and this became a feature in many dresses later in this century, otherwise it set closely over the shoulders to a V shape at the waist, and was filled with a stomacher of fine needlework, bows, or the ends of the lawn fichu laced or caught in by a big bow. A full, loose gown, with the fullness pleated to back and front, came in, the front being held by a bow and the back allowed to fall loose or crossed with a large bow at the back of waist, as in the museum specimen, Fig. 85. This became the more elaborate sack-back dress.
[196]Hoods, capes, and long black wraps were the main outerwear since hats couldn't be worn with the headpieces. However, people sometimes wore small frilled caps, a little straw hat, or a low-crowned felt hat with a wide brim. A small lace frill around the neck also started to show up. Bodices often featured a low curved neckline and had short skirts or shaped pieces, with some having short sleeves over gathered lawn sleeves, while many opted for long sleeves that reached the wrist. Occasionally, a waist belt was noted. There were also sleeves that flared out to the elbow with a square turned-up cuff. The bodice front could be adorned with fastening bands, which became a popular design element in many dresses later in the century; otherwise, it closely followed the shoulders down to a V shape at the waist, often filled with a stomacher of fine needlework, bows, or ends of the lawn wrap secured with a big bow. A full, loose gown emerged, featuring pleats in the front and back, held at the front by a bow, while the back fell loose or crossed with a large bow at the waist, similar to the museum example, Fig. 85. This style evolved into the more elaborate sack-back dress.

Fig. 84.—Period 1700-1725.
Fig. 84.—Period 1700-1725.
[198]The skirts began to be set out in a bell form, and trains were in much favour; the overskirts were parted in front, and many looped up to the back in a similar manner to the last reign. Small aprons of fine embroidery were worn with the best of dresses, and embroidered pockets are seen when the skirts were thrown back. Petticoats of fine quilting became much appreciated, and tall sticks were carried by ladies. Pointed shoes with high heels and latchets tied or buckled, the top of the fronts being mostly cut into four points, or they had a square finish.
[198] Skirts started to take on a bell shape, and trains were quite popular; the overskirts were split in the front, and many were looped up in the back in a way similar to the previous era. Delicate embroidered aprons were worn with the finest dresses, and you could see embroidered pockets when the skirts were lifted. Petticoats with intricate quilting became very well-liked, and women carried long sticks. Pointed shoes with high heels featured ties or buckles, and the fronts were usually cut into four points, or they had a square finish.
EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. ANNE. MALE.
The wigs of the full ringlet style were still the fashion, but a simpler character is noticeable, the hair being combed back off the forehead and allowed to fall in looser waves. But many began to set a mode of smaller "coiffure," with their own hair caught in curls by a bow at the back, and curls over each ear. Powder came into use with the smart set, and a big bow and bag to finish the back of wig appeared, giving a smarter appearance to the white hair.
The full ringlet wig style was still in fashion, but a simpler look was emerging, with hair combed back off the forehead and falling in looser waves. Many started to adopt a trend for smaller hairstyles, using their own hair styled in curls secured with a bow at the back, and curls framing each ear. Powder became popular among the stylish crowd, and a large bow and pouch at the back of the wig emerged, giving a more polished look to the white hair.

Plate XX.
Plate 20.
- (a) Gold-embroidered Muslin Dress. 1795-1805.
- (b) Nine Aprons. Between 1690 and 1850.
- (c) Dress of Spotted Stockinette. 1795-1808.

Fig. 85.—Bodice types. 1700-1725.
Fig. 85.—Bodice styles. 1700-1725.
[200]The hat, sometimes of white felt, was the same three-cornered type, edged with feathers and banded with broad gold braids or silver lace. The neckwear was a bind of lawn, with a long fall finished with lace.
[200]The hat, sometimes made of white felt, was the same three-cornered style, trimmed with feathers and decorated with wide gold braids or silver lace. The neckwear was a lawn tie, featuring a long front finished with lace.
The coat remained long to the knees, but took a greater fullness in the side pleats of the skirt. Large buttons and buttonholes, 3 inches long, are seen, with the same on the cuff, which was worn very large, often 9 inches broad, and mostly of a curved outline, and of another coloured brocade; a tight undersleeve is also seen with these. The coat was sometimes heavily decorated with needlework or braids of gold down the front, pockets, seams, and cuffs. The pocket was wide and set higher in the skirt, and the back opening of coat was decorated by several horizontal braids to the two side pleats.
The coat reached down to the knees but had a fuller look with the side pleats of the skirt. It featured large buttons and buttonholes that were 3 inches long, along with the same design on the cuffs, which were quite wide, often measuring 9 inches across, and usually had a curved shape in a different colored brocade; a fitted undersleeve was also included. The coat was sometimes richly adorned with embroidery or gold braids along the front, pockets, seams, and cuffs. The pocket was spacious and placed higher on the skirt, and the coat's back opening was enhanced with several horizontal braids on the two side pleats.
A long, full-skirted waistcoat, of rich materials or needlework, was at times braided and fringed at the skirt with gold, the pockets covered with a large flap, and five buttons fastened it or were placed as decorations just below it. The front buttons were often reduced to four at the waist, as it was still fashionable to show the lawn shirt.[201]
A long, full-skirted waistcoat made of rich materials or intricate embroidery was sometimes braided and fringed at the hem with gold, with large flaps covering the pockets, and five buttons holding it together or serving as decorations just below. The front buttons were often reduced to four at the waist, as it was still in style to show off the lawn shirt.[201]
Breeches were of the same cut as in the former reign, with five or six side buttons at the knee, and stockings with embroidered clocks were worn rolled over outside the breeches as before.
Breeches were cut the same way as in the previous reign, with five or six side buttons at the knee, and stockings with embroidered designs were worn rolled over the outside of the breeches just like before.
Shoes were square at the toes and not quite so long, while the heels were still rather heavy, and red was the mode. They had a high square top at the front instep, and buckles fastened the latchets. Muffs were often carried by the dandies, and walking-sticks, with tassel and loop, were slung on the arm; besides a sword, which, passing through the side pleats and out at the back, helped to set out the coat, which was often stiffened in the skirts. Gloves, with short gauntlets very angular or curved in shape, were trimmed with gold fringe; the backs were also richly embroidered with gold or silver.
Shoes had square toes and weren't very long, while the heels were still pretty heavy, and red was the fashion. They featured a high, square top at the front instep, with buckles securing the straps. Dandies often carried muffs and had walking sticks with tassels and loops slung over their arms; they also carried a sword that passed through side pleats and came out at the back, which helped to accentuate the coat, often stiffened at the skirts. Gloves had short gauntlets that were very angular or curved and were trimmed with gold fringe; the backs were also richly embroidered with gold or silver.
EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. GEORGE I. FEMALE.

Fig. 86.—1725-1750.
Fig. 86.—1725-1750.

Plate XXI.—23 Boots and Shoes. From 1800-75.
Plate XXI.—23 Boots and Shoes. From 1800-1875.
- 1., 2. 1800-1820.
- 3. 1810-1828.
- 5., 8., 9., 10. 1820-1830.
- 13., 16., 16A. 1830-1855.
- 4., 6., 7., 12., 14., 15., 17. 1850-1865.
- 11., 18.-22. 1860-1875.

Fig. 87.—Period 1725-1750.
Fig. 87.—Period 1725-1750.

Fig. 88.—Modes, 1750-1770.
Fig. 88.—Styles, 1750-1770.

Fig. 89.—Various Styles in Cut Back of Bodice.
Fig. 89.—Different Styles in Bodice Cut Backs.
The hair was very simply gathered from the forehead and taken up to a knot of curls at the back. Occasionally a group of curls was allowed to fall behind, or a curl was arranged to fall on one shoulder,[206] and waved curls of the Queen Anne type were still seen on many people. Caps, with long dropping points in front, sometimes tied under the chin or with long lappets at the back, were the chief favourites, also a small frilled cap. Shallow-crowned straw hats with various widths of brim; hoods and capes, both short and long, are seen, besides light silks draped from the hair to the waist, feathers, flowers, and ribbons being worn in the head-dress. Richly embroidered aprons were worn with the finest dresses.
The hair was simply pulled back from the forehead and styled into a knot of curls at the back. Sometimes, a few curls were allowed to fall down or a curl was arranged to cascade over one shoulder,[206] and waved curls from the Queen Anne style were still popular among many. Caps with long, trailing points in the front were commonly tied under the chin or had long flaps at the back, alongside a small frilled cap. Shallow-crowned straw hats varied in brim width; hoods and capes, both short and long, were also worn, along with lightweight silks draping from the hair to the waist. Feathers, flowers, and ribbons adorned the headdress. Richly embroidered aprons complemented the finest dresses.
The sack-back dress was very full, and started right across the shoulders in two double box-pleats, which were kept trim by being sewn flat for two to four inches down. Sleeves to the elbow were rather full, and gathered at the shoulders, with a square cuff often decorated with a bow in front, and a fan of lace, sometimes in several rows, fell from beneath. Sleeves finishing in a shaped edge are occasionally seen. The skirts were made for the very round hoop setting, and were gathered in flat pleats on either hip. A wide pleat or two came from the shoulders down the front sometimes as a continuation of the sack-back. These pleats, meeting at the waist,[207] formed a V shape, which was filled by an embroidered stomacher, or made of the same material, crossed by bands, bows, or rows of lace. The flat front pleat was occasionally embroidered, and gradually widened to the bottom of the skirt. Very pointed toes to the shoes, and high heels, with tied or buckled latchets, are seen, the tops of the front often being shaped into four points.
The sack-back dress was very full and started across the shoulders with two double box pleats, which were kept neat by being sewn flat for two to four inches down. The elbow-length sleeves were quite full and gathered at the shoulders, featuring a square cuff often embellished with a bow in the front, and a fan of lace, sometimes in several rows, cascaded from underneath. Occasionally, sleeves finished with a shaped edge can be seen. The skirts were designed for a very round hoop shape and were gathered into flat pleats on either hip. One or two wide pleats came down from the shoulders to the front, sometimes as an extension of the sack-back. These pleats met at the waist, forming a V shape, which was filled with an embroidered stomacher or made of the same fabric, crossed with bands, bows, or rows of lace. The flat front pleat was sometimes embroidered and gradually widened to the bottom of the skirt. Shoes had very pointed toes and high heels, adorned with tied or buckled latchets, and the tops of the fronts were often shaped into four points.
EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. GEORGE I. MALE.
Long, full wigs are still seen amongst older men, but several new shapes appear as illustrated (Fig. 90), and the black bow and bag became very large; a black ribbon attached to it, with a bow in front, came round the neck. We also see the ends of the wig made into a long, tight pigtail. Hats were of the same three-cornered shape, rather fuller in size, and the feathered edging was still favoured. A hat of the type of Fig. 105 was also worn; and the loose cap with a tassel was put on when the wig was removed (see Fig. 104).
Long, full wigs are still seen on older men, but several new styles have emerged as shown (Fig. 90), and the black bow and bag became quite large; a black ribbon attached to it, with a bow in front, wrapped around the neck. We also see the ends of the wig styled into a long, tight pigtail. Hats maintained the same three-cornered shape but were a bit fuller in size, and the feathered trim was still popular. A hat similar to Fig. 105 was also worn; and the loose cap with a tassel was put on when the wig was taken off (see Fig. 104).

Fig. 90.—Wig types, 1st half 18th century.
Fig. 90.—Wig styles, first half of the 18th century.

Fig. 91.—List of Dated Shoes and Boots.
Fig. 91.—List of Shoes and Boots with Dates.
- 1700-1750.
- 1700-1780.
- 1700-1780.
- 1700-1750.
- 1700-1760.
- 1720-1780.
- 1690-1720.
- 1700-1750.
- 1700-1740.
- 1740-1760.
- 1702-1720.
- 1730-1750.
- 1760-1800.
- 1730-1760.
- 1740-1770.
- 1770-1780.
- 1740-1780.
- 1786-1796.
- 1774-1784.
- 1775-1790.
- Sole of shoe No. 22.
- 1776-1800.
- 1780-1790.
The neck had the same lawn bind with a long lace ruffle, and the coat the same[210] full cut as in the last reign, and the large rounded cuff was still in favour, but many varieties of size were now worn. A vertical pocket is seen occasionally on cloth coats, also a cape and turned-down collar are noted, while several appear with a very small upright collar. Buttons were still worn on some coats, right down the front; but on many coats the buttons stopped level with the pocket.
The neck had the same lawn binding with a long lace ruffle, and the coat had the same[210] full cut as in the previous era, and the large rounded cuff was still popular, though many different sizes were now worn. A vertical pocket can sometimes be seen on cloth coats, and a cape and turned-down collar are also noted, while several have a very small upright collar. Buttons were still used on some coats, going all the way down the front; however, on many coats, the buttons stopped level with the pocket.
A short-skirted coat came in amongst the dandies towards the end of the reign, and was stiffened out on the skirts; these mostly had a tighter sleeve and cuff. The same decorations continued in use. Waistcoats were much the same, and were cut to the length of the coats, or about four inches shorter; they were buttoned higher, the lace often falling outside.
A short-skirted coat became popular among the stylish crowd towards the end of the reign, and it had stiffened skirts; these typically featured tighter sleeves and cuffs. The same decorations were still being used. Waistcoats were similar and were designed to be the same length as the coats or about four inches shorter; they were buttoned higher, with the lace often hanging outside.
Breeches were the same in cut, fastened with six buttons and a buckle at the side of the knee. The stockings, usually decorated with clocks, were still worn rolled outside the knee amongst smart people. The stiff high boots or gaiters generally had a full curved piece at the top, and short gaiters to the calf are also to be noticed.
Breeches had the same cut, secured with six buttons and a buckle at the side of the knee. Stockings, often embellished with designs, were still worn rolled down outside the knee by fashionable individuals. The stiff high boots or gaiters typically featured a full, curved piece at the top, and short gaiters on the calf were also noticeable.
The shoes were square-toed or of a[211] roundish form, with a short or rather high square front, and heels of various heights. Patches and make-up were used by the fops, and swords and sticks carried, the latter being very high, to 46 inches.
The shoes had square toes or a roundish shape, with a short or slightly high square front, and heels of different heights. The dandy types used makeup and patches, and carried swords and canes, the latter sometimes being as tall as 46 inches.
EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. GEORGE II. FEMALE.
The hair was treated in much the same manner as with George I up to the end of this reign—gathered back from the forehead to a bunch of curls at the back. The small hats and caps, often worn together, continued of the same character; the dresses also remained similar in cut. The sack-back dress was supreme in the fifties, when it was set with panniers, together with the hoops, but the latter were not so much worn towards the end of this reign, except for the "grand dress." Quilted petticoats were much worn, but flounces are not a feature on the skirts till the latter part of this period. The simpler dress was of various lengths, and was at times worn quite short up to 1740. The corset bodice was still in use, with lawn sleeves: square cuffs and lace ruffles held the lead throughout this time, but the fan-shaped[214] sleeve finish to the elbow, in the same material as the dress, began to appear about 1750, generally with a waved or scalloped edge. Pointed toes and high-heeled shoes continued, with either tied or buckled latchets, and long gloves and mittens were in use.
The hairstyles were styled similarly to those in the time of George I until the end of this reign—pulled back from the forehead into a bunch of curls at the back. The small hats and caps, often worn together, kept the same style; the dresses also remained similar in cut. The sack-back dress was the most popular in the fifties, especially when it featured panniers and hoops, but the latter were less common by the end of this reign, except for formal occasions. Quilted petticoats were widely worn, although flounces didn't appear on skirts until later in this period. Simpler dresses varied in length and were occasionally worn quite short up until 1740. The corset bodice was still in fashion, often paired with lawn sleeves: square cuffs and lace ruffles remained popular during this time, but starting around 1750, fan-shaped sleeve finishes that matched the dress began to show up, typically with a wavy or scalloped edge. Pointed toes and high-heeled shoes were still in style, with either tied or buckled straps, and long gloves and mittens were commonly used.

Fig. 92.—Three hoops and four pannier forms.
Fig. 92.—Three hoops and four basket styles.

Quilted designs on Petticoats, 18th century.
Quilted designs on petticoats, 18th century.
Fig. 93.
Fig. 93.
EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. GEORGE II. MALE.
Wigs with double points at the back, short curled or of long pigtailed shapes, some with side curls, others curled all round the front, were worn. Large bows and bags, or no bows, finished the back hair, and the bow to the front of the neck was in use from the early part of this reign. Long coats, as in the last reign, and short coats with stiffened skirts were used; many with braided seams and fronts, also a braided opening at the back. Large round cuffs and big square ones, caped coats, and coats with turn-down collars were all in the mode, and the "maccaroni" fashions started about 1760, with absurdities in small hats, clubbed wigs, and very short coats. High sticks and crook sticks, canes and swords continued in use.
Wigs with double points at the back, short curls, or long pigtailed styles were popular, some featuring side curls while others had curls all around the front. Large bows and bags, or sometimes no bows at all, completed the hair at the back, and a bow at the front of the neck had been in style since the early part of this reign. Long coats, like those from the last reign, and short coats with stiffened skirts were worn, many featuring braided seams and fronts, as well as a braided opening at the back. Big round cuffs and large square ones, caped coats, and coats with turn-down collars were all in vogue, and the "maccaroni" fashion began around 1760, showcasing ridiculous small hats, clubbed wigs, and very short coats. High sticks, crook sticks, canes, and swords remained in fashion.

Plate XXII.
Plate 22.
- (a) Linen Dress. 1795-1808. Pattern of Bodice, see p. 316.
- (b) Silk Bodice. 1825-30.
- (c) Silk Bodice. 1818-25.

Fig. 94.—Wig types, second half 18th century.
Fig. 94.—Wig styles, late 18th century.
The pocket flaps were of a curved form,[216] with a rounded centre still, and many of the shoes had a high square front, high heels, and square toes: according to the caricature prints of Boitard, the fashionable hats were smaller in 1730, and much larger ten years later; very full skirts at the former date, and smaller and less stiffened at the latter. Stockings were often still worn outside the knee. Shoes reached an extreme high square front at the latter date, and gloves with curved or square cuffs are to be noted.
The pocket flaps had a curved shape,[216] with a rounded center, and many of the shoes featured a high square front, high heels, and square toes. According to Boitard’s caricature prints, fashionable hats were smaller in 1730 and much larger ten years later; skirts were very full at that time but became smaller and less stiff later on. Stockings were often worn over the knee. By the later date, shoes had an extreme high square front, and gloves with curved or square cuffs were common.

Fig. 95.—First Half Eighteenth Century.
Fig. 95.—Early 18th Century.
[217]EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. GEORGE III TO 1800. FEMALE.
This long reign, like that of Queen Victoria, embraces several changes of style. Up till about 1785 white powder was still used for the hair, reaching its fullest extravagance in the middle of the seventies, set with pearls, bandeaus, caps, lace, flowers and feathers, and about 1776 the top was widened considerably. The front hair, gathered from the forehead, was pressed in a forward curve over a high pad, with one to three curls at the sides and one at the shoulders, the back hair being arranged in a loose loop, curled on the top and set with a large bow at the back; a small round hat with very small low crown (usually decorated with flowers and silks gathered into puffs, or ribbons and small feathers) was tilted right on the front. About 1780 large mob caps with a big bow on the front came in, and were generally worn together with the tall-crowned hat or the large-brimmed hat in favour at this time. A cape with smallish hood worn in the earlier reigns was supplanted about 1777 by the calash, a huge[222] hood set out with whalebone which came to cover the full head-dresses. The heavier caped or hooded cloak, sometimes with side opening for the arms, and usually trimmed with fur, still remained in use to 1800.
This long reign, like Queen Victoria's, saw several changes in style. Up until around 1785, people still used white powder in their hair, which reached its peak extravagance in the mid-seventies, adorned with pearls, bandeaus, caps, lace, flowers, and feathers. By around 1776, the hairstyle became significantly wider. The front hair, gathered from the forehead, was styled in a forward curve over a high pad, featuring one to three curls on the sides and one at the shoulders, while the back was arranged in a loose loop, curled on top, and finished with a large bow at the back. A small round hat with a very low crown, usually embellished with flowers and silks gathered into puffs, ribbons, and small feathers, was worn tilted at the front. Around 1780, large mob caps with a big bow in front became popular and were typically worn with a tall-crowned hat or the large-brimmed hat favored at that time. A cape with a small hood, which was common in earlier reigns, was replaced around 1777 by the calash, a large hood supported by whalebone that covered the elaborate head-dresses. The heavier caped or hooded cloak, sometimes featuring side openings for the arms and usually trimmed with fur, remained in use until 1800.

Fig. 96.—Costume notes, 1770-1780.
Fig. 96.—Outfit notes, 1770-1780.

Plate XXIII.
Plate 23.
- (a) Muslin Dress with Tinsel Design. 1798-1810.
- (b) Silk Dress. Period George IV.
- (c) Satin and Gauze Dress. 1820-30.

Fig. 97.—Head Dress. Period 1780-1795.
Fig. 97.—Headwear. Period 1780-1795.

Fig. 98.—Hats and Caps during period 1780-1795.
Fig. 98.—Hats and Caps from 1780-1795.

Fig. 99.—Hats during period 1790-1800.
Fig. 99.—Hats from 1790-1800.
The bodice retained the same shape as in the former reign, rather longer in the points back and front, with a large fan finish to the sleeve, double or single; this became supplanted by a much-gathered elbow-piece, sometimes eight inches deep, gathered in four rows. Small drawn gathers started round the waist of the skirt, for the side panniers and hoops were being less worn, except for the "smart gown," but bunching, reefing, and looping took their place in effect, and quilted petticoats remained while this character of dress lasted. The later sack-back dress was sewn tighter to the body, and usually started in a narrower set at the back, while the full pleat from the shoulder down the front went out, and the neck was more displayed by lower bodice fronts, which continued to be set with bows, jewels, lace, or embroidery. Sack-back jackets were often worn in the seventies; when the sack began to disappear, it took[224] the form of overlapped seams on the bodice. The decorated side pockets are noted in prints showing tuck-up dresses to 1775. The jacket bodice of the same form described in the preceding reign was perhaps more in evidence till 1780, not so long in the skirt as in the earlier reigns, but after this date it took a longer skirt, which was often pleated at the back, with a very low neck and short waist.
The bodice kept the same shape as before, with longer points at the back and front and a large fan finish on the sleeve, whether double or single. This was replaced by a heavily gathered elbow piece, sometimes eight inches deep, gathered in four rows. Small gathers began around the waist of the skirt, as side panniers and hoops were worn less frequently, except for the "smart gown," but bunching, reefing, and looping took their place visually, and quilted petticoats remained while this style lasted. The later sack-back dress was made tighter to the body and usually started narrower at the back, while the full pleat from the shoulder down the front went out of style, and the neck was more open due to lower bodice fronts, which continued to be adorned with bows, jewels, lace, or embroidery. Sack-back jackets were often worn in the seventies; when the sack began to fade away, it transformed into overlapped seams on the bodice. The decorated side pockets are noted in prints showing tuck-up dresses until 1775. The jacket bodice of the same style described in the previous reign was probably more prominent until 1780, not as long in the skirt as in earlier reigns, but after this date, it took on a longer skirt that was often pleated at the back, with a very low neck and short waist.

Fig. 100.—Period 1780-1795.
Fig. 100.—Period 1780-1795.
About 1780 we find a change of style appearing in a shorter waist, with less pointed setting, having often a rounded point or square tabs, and even a shaped finish to the corset front, which was sometimes used like a waistcoat effect under the cut-away dresses seen after 1770 (see Fig. 99, p. 221). A general tendency to imitate male attire is apparent, and the front of the bodice was set with lapels and straps buttoned across (though I have noted this latter character in the early part of this century), and long coats with this character were much worn, with two or three capes. The sleeves are sometimes set over a tight undersleeve, in fact the longer sleeve to the wrist became fashionable. With this change a short gathered skirt is seen on some bodices, and[226] the full gathered skirt was bunched out at the back on a bustle, of which I give an illustration (p. 212), the low neck being filled with a large lawn fichu; a wide belt was generally worn, or a wide sash and bow at the back or side is seen with the lighter dresses, these being simple in style, just gathered at the waist, with short full sleeves set with a frill, and another frill was also arranged round the neck.
Around 1780, there was a noticeable shift in style characterized by shorter waists and less pointed designs, which often featured rounded points or square tabs, and occasionally a shaped front on the corset. This would sometimes serve a waistcoat-like purpose under the cut-away dresses that became popular after 1770 (see Fig. 99, p. 221). There was a clear tendency to mimic male fashion, with bodice fronts equipped with lapels and straps buttoned across (though I've observed this style emerging earlier in the century). Long coats of this style became quite popular, often with two or three capes. Sleeves sometimes layered over tight undersleeves, and the longer sleeve reaching the wrist became fashionable. Along with this, short gathered skirts appeared on some bodices, and the full gathered skirt was accented at the back with a bustle, which I illustrate (p. 212). The low neckline was often filled in with a large lawn fichu. A wide belt was commonly worn, or a broad sash and bow placed at the back or side accompanied the lighter dresses, which were simple in style, gathered at the waist with short full sleeves trimmed with frills, and another frill often decorated the neck.

Fig. 101.
Fig. 101.
About 1790 the mode again began to change to a classic style, still higher in the waist, with a short tight sleeve, at times puffed in the upper part, or an outer and under sleeve, as per illustration A, Plate XXII (see p. 215). The fronts of this type of bodice were mostly buttoned or pinned up to the shoulders over a tight underfront, the skirt opening about 18 inches at the sides, thus saving a fastening at the back. I have illustrated some very interestingly cut jackets of this period from my collection, as A, Plate XXIV (see p. 231); the sleeves were very long and were ruckled on the arm, as likewise were the long gloves or mittens of this time. A long scarf or drape was carried with this style, and a round helmet-like hat in straw or a turban was adopted. High sticks were[230] still carried by ladies till the nineties, and umbrellas or parasols; the former came into vogue about 1770, the latter about six years later. Muffs of beautifully embroidered silk and satin were set with purfled trimmings, gold and silver lace, or bows and ribbons; otherwise they were of furs or feathers. They remained rather small up to 1780, when a very large shape set in, which continued till the end of the reign; the quantity of beautiful fans of this century must be so well known as to need no description. The highest artistry was concentrated on them.
Around 1790, the fashion began shifting again towards a classic style, featuring a higher waist and short, fitted sleeves that were sometimes puffed at the top, or there were both an outer and an inner sleeve, as shown in illustration A, Plate XXII (see p. 215). The fronts of this bodice style were mostly buttoned or pinned up to the shoulders over a tight underfront, with the skirt opening about 18 inches at the sides, allowing for no fastening at the back. I have shown some very interestingly designed jackets from this period in my collection, as A, Plate XXIV (see p. 231); the sleeves were very long and were gathered at the arm, just like the long gloves or mittens of the time. A long scarf or drape accompanied this style, along with a round, helmet-like hat made of straw or a turban. High sticks were[230] still carried by ladies until the 1890s, as well as umbrellas or parasols; the former became popular around 1770, while the latter followed about six years later. Muffs made of beautifully embroidered silk and satin featured fancy trimmings, gold and silver lace, or bows and ribbons; otherwise, they were made of fur or feathers. They remained relatively small until 1780, when a much larger style became popular, continuing until the end of the reign; the number of exquisite fans from this century is so well-known that they hardly need any description. The highest level of artistry was focused on them.

Fig. 102.—Period 1790-1800.
Fig. 102.—Era 1790-1800.

Fig. 103.—Costume notes, 1790-1800.
Fig. 103.—Costume notes, 1790-1800.

Fig. 104.—Lounge Caps worn during removal of Wig.
Fig. 104.—Lounge Caps used while taking off the Wig.
Shoes at the beginning of this reign were set on very high spindle heels; the toe-front became rounded, the instep-front a pointed shape, and wide latchets were buckled till about 1785, but fashion discarded them earlier; for about 1780 the shoes became very small at the heel, and pointed again at the toe. When the latchets went out, the pointed instep remained for a time, but a low round front appeared, and the heel practically vanished just before 1800. These later shoes were decorated on the front by needlework or incised leather openwork underlaid with another colour. The soles at this time[231] were extremely quaint in shape, and the shoes were tied sandal fashion up the ankle.
At the beginning of this era, shoes had very high spindle heels; the front of the toe was rounded, the front of the instep was pointed, and wide straps were buckled until about 1785, though fashion began to move away from them earlier. Around 1780, shoes became smaller at the heel and pointed again at the toe. When the straps went out of style, the pointed instep lasted for a while, but a low round front emerged, and the heel practically disappeared just before 1800. These later shoes were decorated at the front with needlework or cut-out leather designs layered with another color. At that time, the soles[231] had a very unique shape, and the shoes were tied around the ankle like sandals.

Plate XXIV.
Plate 24.
- (a) Outdoor Silk Jacket. 1798-1808.
- (b) Embroidered Muslin Bodice. 1816-30.
- (c) Embroidered Muslin Bodice. 1824-25.
- (d) Satin and Gauze Bodice. 1820-30.
EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. GEORGE III TO 1800. MALE.
The wigs, which were rather high in the front of the crown in the earlier part, began to cast off the most eccentric forms, and became just curled, rather full at the sides, and tied with a bow at the back: dull pink powder became a favoured hue from about 1780; most people began to return to their own hair, and one might see many without long hair in the nineties. The last type of dressing the hair in imitation of the wig form was a long, tightly braided pigtail at the back, with one or even two side curls over the ear, and side whiskers were allowed to fill up to them; thus when the short hair set the fashion, side whiskers came in.
The wigs, which were quite tall at the front of the crown in the earlier days, started to take on the most unusual shapes, becoming just curled, fuller at the sides, and tied with a bow at the back. Dull pink powder became a popular choice around 1780; many people began to go back to their natural hair, and it was common to see many without long hair in the 1890s. The final style of dressing hair to mimic the wig shape was a long, tightly braided pigtail at the back, with one or even two curls on the side over the ear, and sideburns were allowed to grow out to match; so when short hair became fashionable, sideburns also came into style.
Hats were still worn of the three-cornered shape, but the favourites became a front cockade hat and a hat with a rounded crown and rather wide brim, sometimes turned up on one side; a short type of top-hat was also often seen, and later became[232] the fashion. The same lawn and lace cravat developed into more of a plain white stock, with a frilled shirt-front.
Hats were still worn in a three-cornered style, but the popular choices became the front cockade hat and a hat with a rounded crown and a fairly wide brim, which was sometimes turned up on one side. A shorter version of the top hat was also commonly seen and later became[232] the trend. The same lawn and lace cravat evolved into a simpler white stock, paired with a frilled shirt front.
The coat was worn much tighter in the arms and was smartly cut, with the fronts running away into a narrow tailed skirt. The pockets often began to take a plain square form, with or without buttons; the buttons on the front of the coat stopped at the waist—many cuffs are seen without them; and the side pleats, set more to the back, were pressed and narrower. Both the plain and turn-over collars were set up high in the neck, large cut-steel buttons were introduced in the early seventies, and many fancy china buttons, besides the gilt silver and paste ones were in use. A new type of coat made its appearance with a high turn-over collar and large lapels, and a sudden cut-in of the coat-front high in the waist, giving a very long-tailed effect to the skirt. A cuff shape with these was mostly made in one with the sleeve and buttoned at the side towards the back, and when the cuff was additional, it seldom had buttons, as formerly.
The coat fit much tighter in the arms and had a stylish cut, with the front tapering into a narrow tailed skirt. The pockets often took on a simple square shape, with or without buttons; the buttons on the front of the coat ended at the waist—many cuffs were seen without them; and the side pleats, positioned more towards the back, were pressed and narrower. Both the plain and turned-up collars were high on the neck, large cut-steel buttons were introduced in the early seventies, and many decorative china buttons, along with gilt silver and paste ones, were in use. A new style of coat emerged featuring a high turned-up collar and large lapels, with a sharp cut-in at the waist that created a very elongated tail effect for the skirt. The cuff design was usually integrated with the sleeve and buttoned on the side towards the back, and when the cuff was separate, it rarely had buttons like before.
A greatcoat with one, two, or three capes was a picturesque garment, and a leather-covered bottle was often carried[234] when riding a distance, of which I have an example in my collection.
A greatcoat with one, two, or three capes was a striking piece of clothing, and a leather-covered flask was commonly brought along[234] when traveling a long distance, which I have an example of in my collection.

Fig. 105.
Fig. 105.
Waistcoats, which had become much shorter, were now giving place to a type with a straight-across front and turned-back lapels at the neck; these large lapels were mostly worn outside over the coat lapel. The waistcoats were often double-breasted with an embroidered design down the front between the double row of buttons, and the straight pockets of these had no flaps; they shortened at the waist in character with the lapelled coat, but were worn lower than the cut-in shape of the coat, showing about 3 inches when the coat was fastened. Breeches became very tight, and trousers begin to appear after 1790. Striped stockings and suits were much in favour. Top-boots with rather long brown tops were worn, or high boots with a curved top, with a gold tassel set in front, were seen. The shoes with latchets and buckles had a low front on the instep, and from about 1780 took a rather pointed oval toe shape; the heels were mostly worn shorter. Swords were not so much in use except on great occasions, but sword-sticks were carried, and heavy club-sticks were fashionable before 1800. Patches were little[236] used after the seventies, but the snuff-box was still indispensable. The double long purse with central rings and tassels at the ends was carried, of knitted silk or of leather, the former with steel beads and coloured silks worked together after 1780: small bag purses were also in use, usually set in gilt mounts and made in the same methods with a tassel below.
Waistcoats, which had become much shorter, were now being replaced by a style with a straight-across front and turned-back lapels at the neck; these large lapels were typically worn outside over the coat lapel. The waistcoats were often double-breasted with an embroidered design down the front between the two rows of buttons, and the straight pockets had no flaps; they were shorter in the waist to match the lapelled coat, but they were worn lower than the coat's cut-in shape, showing about 3 inches when the coat was fastened. Breeches became very tight, and trousers began to appear after 1790. Striped stockings and suits were quite popular. Top-boots with fairly long brown tops were worn, or high boots with a curved top, featuring a gold tassel at the front. Shoes with latchets and buckles had a low front on the instep, and from around 1780, they took on a rather pointed oval toe shape; the heels were mostly worn shorter. Swords weren't used as much except for special occasions, but sword-sticks were carried, and heavy club-sticks were trendy before 1800. Patches were rarely used after the seventies, but the snuff-box was still essential. The double long purse with central rings and tassels at the ends was carried, made of knitted silk or leather, the former decorated with steel beads and colored silks crafted together after 1780: small bag purses were also used, usually mounted in gilt and made with similar methods, finished with a tassel below.

Plate XXV.
Plate 25.
- (a) Silk Dress. 1800-10.
- (b) Cotton Dress. 1800-10.
- (c) Embroidered Muslin Dress. 1820-30 (Pattern, see p. 339).
- (d) Silk Gauze Dress. 1824-30.

Fig. 106.
Fig. 106.
CHAPTER VIII[237]
CHARACTER OF TRIMMINGS OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY.
During the later part of the 18th century, a great deal of tinsel drawn work was done on fine muslin, and became beautifully treated in delicate design on the hem and down the front of many of the high-waisted dresses as in Fig. A, Plate XXIII (see p. 218). Later on towards the twenties we see a great deal of effective coarse work in heavy gold tinsel, and at the same time to the forties a number of dresses were ably enriched with fine gold thread.
During the later part of the 18th century, a lot of tinsel embroidery was done on fine muslin, creating beautiful delicate designs on the hem and down the front of many high-waisted dresses, as seen in Fig. A, Plate XXIII (see p. 218). Moving into the 1820s, we see a lot of striking coarse work in heavy gold tinsel, and by the 1840s, many dresses were skillfully enhanced with fine gold thread.
The white embroidery in the earlier trimmings of this period, of which I give examples in Plate XXIV (see p. 231), was remarkable for its wealth of fancy; the chief beauty of these dresses was the delightful treatment of gathered effects, and with the[238] reign of George IV we note the gradual return of the longer pointed bodice, with the growth of very full sleeves, also the increase in the size and fuller set-out of the skirts over the stiff flounced drill petticoats. The V-shaped Bertha setting to neck and shoulders began to establish itself, and became a great feature through the thirties and forties; the first signs of it appear about 1814. Varieties of materials were used to great advantage in designing, and drawn tulle trimmings were happily introduced to soften hard shapes and colours. The shoulder fullness also began to be neatly drawn in and held by straps, which gave a charming character to many bodices.
The white embroidery in the earlier trimmings of this period, which I show in Plate XXIV (see p. 231), was notable for its intricate designs; the main appeal of these dresses was the lovely way gathered effects were handled. With the[238] reign of George IV, we see the gradual comeback of the longer pointed bodice, paired with very full sleeves, and an increase in the size and fullness of skirts over stiff flounced drill petticoats. The V-shaped Bertha neckline began to gain popularity, becoming a significant feature throughout the thirties and forties; the first signs of it appeared around 1814. Various materials were cleverly used in design, and drawn tulle trimmings were happily introduced to soften rigid shapes and colors. The shoulder fullness also started to be neatly cinched in and secured with straps, which added a charming touch to many bodices.
From 1816 choice work in piped shapes, often of flower forms decorated with pearls or beads, was set on fine net, as seen in Plates XXIII and XXIX (see pp. 218, 263). The attraction to the thirties was the happy effects gained by the bow and flower looping on the flounces, and these ripened in fancy and variety through the forties. Braiding was adopted in the thirties with a rather charming treatment of tassels down the front of the dress; the polonaises of this time were[239] also effective and simple, caught here and there with posies of flowers, and we find this fashion again revived in the sixties.
From 1816, beautifully designed piped shapes, often resembling flowers and adorned with pearls or beads, were placed on fine net, as shown in Plates XXIII and XXIX (see pp. 218, 263). The trend in the thirties was the delightful effects created by bows and flower loops on flounces, which evolved in creativity and variety throughout the forties. Braiding was introduced in the thirties, featuring an appealing design of tassels along the front of the dress; the polonaises from this period were[239] also striking and straightforward, occasionally adorned with small flower bouquets, a style that saw a revival in the sixties.
With the reign of George IV we notice an increasing choice of strong coloured effects, which culminated in the mid-Victorian era in raw colour and violent shot silks, velvets, and heavy fringes, but one may see that many of these dresses of bright pure tone looked exceedingly refined and were quite stately. A remarkable dress is Fig. A, Plate XXXII (see p. 279), which is of very strong bright blue; its only enrichment being a curved line of folded silk. All these dresses from 1800 were delightfully embellished with embroidered fichus, light scarves of frail gauze, crêpe, or Norwich silk, and in the Victorian times capes and V-shaped shawls; fascinating lace ruffles and tuck-in fronts to the bodice necks, of frills and bands of embroidery, broke the severity or bareness of many dresses. An endless variety of fascinating caps and lace head-lappets was pinned or caught into the hair at the wearer's fancy; besides the bows, flowers, and jewels (especially pearls) which have always played an important part in the coiffure from early times, the chatelaines[240] and bags, fobs, fans, and lace or silk handkerchiefs all give the artist a note of extra colour when desired. The cruel period of taste really came with the seventies, though one can trace many quaint and interesting cuts in the bodices and skirts of this time; but the "grand dress" of complicated drapings, heavily fringed or braided, was a "set piece" which, let us hope, will never appear again.
During George IV's reign, we saw an increasing variety of bold colors, reaching a peak in the mid-Victorian era with bright hues and bold shot silks, velvets, and heavy fringes. However, many of these dresses in vivid, pure tones appeared quite elegant and impressive. A noteworthy dress is Fig. A, Plate XXXII (see p. 279), which features a striking bright blue color and is only enhanced by a curved line of folded silk. Since 1800, these dresses have been beautifully adorned with embroidered fichus, delicate scarves made from fragile gauze, crêpe, or Norwich silk, and in the Victorian era, capes and V-shaped shawls. Intricate lace ruffles and tuck-in details at the bodice necks, along with frills and bands of embroidery, softened the plainness of many dresses. An endless variety of charming caps and lace head-lappets were pinned or styled in the wearer's hair as desired, alongside bows, flowers, and jewels (especially pearls), which have always been significant in hairstyles from early times. Chatelaines[240], bags, fobs, fans, and lace or silk handkerchiefs added extra color when needed. The harsh period of taste really emerged in the seventies, although many unique and interesting designs in the bodices and skirts can be traced back to this era. Still, the elaborate "grand dress" with complicated draping, heavy fringes, or braiding was a "set piece" that we can only hope never returns.
The long stocking-purse which began to appear in the late 17th century was up to 1820 sometimes carried tucked through the belt; it was set with a pair of metal rings and tassels of steel or gilt beads. Small and large circular and bag-shaped purses were also in use; all these were made in coloured silk threads enriched with steel, gilt, or coloured beads, the latter shapes being set in chased metal mounts, the circular ones generally having a fringe and the bag shape a small tassel or heavy drop. These shapes can also be seen in coloured leathers with a leather tassel, besides the plain money-bag with a draw-string.[241]
The long stocking purse that started to show up in the late 17th century was sometimes worn tucked through the belt until 1820. It had a pair of metal rings and tassels made of steel or gilt beads. Both small and large circular purses, as well as bag-shaped ones, were also used; all of these were made from colored silk threads enhanced with steel, gilt, or colored beads, with the latter designs typically featuring intricate metal mounts. The circular purses usually had a fringe, while the bag-shaped ones had a small tassel or a heavy drop. These designs can also be seen in colored leathers with a leather tassel, in addition to the simple money bag with a drawstring.[241]
NINETEENTH CENTURY. GEORGE III. FEMALE.
The hair up to 1808 was gathered into a knot of curls at the back of the head, rather high up, with a small curl at the sides in front of the ear. Later the knot was set more on the top, and the side curls were made more of a feature, several being arranged at the sides. Numerous varieties of large and small brimmed hats, bonnets, and turbans are seen, and several masculine top-hats and cockade hats may be noted late in this reign. The usual feather decorations and large ribbons or flowers were in use, and a handkerchief was sometimes bound over the top of the straw hat and tied under the chin.
The hairstyle up until 1808 was styled into a knot of curls at the back of the head, positioned quite high, with a small curl on the sides in front of the ear. Later on, the knot was placed more towards the top, and the side curls became more prominent, with several arranged at the sides. A variety of large and small-brimmed hats, bonnets, and turbans were popular, and there were also some masculine top hats and cockade hats seen towards the end of this period. Common decorations included feather accessories and large ribbons or flowers, and sometimes a handkerchief was tied over the top of the straw hat and secured under the chin.

Fig. 107.—Costume notes, 1811-1812.
Fig. 107.—Costume notes, 1811-1812.

Fig. 108.—Costume notes, 1814-1816.
Fig. 108.—Costume notes, 1814-1816.
The classic high-waisted dress continued till 1808, and was often beautifully decorated with white embroidery and gold or tinsel, as in A, Plates XX and XXIII (see pp. 199, 218), and the frontispiece is a lovely white example. There were several interesting drapings, one being a cord hanging from the back of the shoulder to loop up the train of the dress, as in A, Plate XXII (see p. 215). The simple tunic shapes are better described[244] by the illustrations: more originality was essayed in design after the last-mentioned date. A high Vandyked lace collar and fan setting to the shoulders appeared, and many interesting dresses of a plain cut, mostly in velvet and silks, were worn about 1810-12. A gathered sleeve drawn tight at intervals was often seen up to 1816, when embroidered ruffles and frills decorated most of the necks and skirts, and a braided type of character, rather military in effect with beautifully piped edgings, came in from about 1817. Spencer bodices were an additional interest at this period, and a short puff sleeve was generally banded or caught with bows; these being often worn over a fairly loose long sleeve gathered by a wristband. Dresses were worn shorter from about 1810. Charming lace and embroidered fichus crossed the shoulders, and long scarf-capes were thrown round the neck and were often tied round behind, as in the 18th century; long capes with points and tassels in front fell to the knees, and a simple pelisse with cape became a pleasing feature. Bags were always carried, of which there is a variety of shapes in the plates; long gloves or mittens were generally worn. Parasols of a flat shape, or others[246] with round or pagoda shaped tops are seen, many being edged with a deep fringe. Long purses were often tucked through the waistband.
The classic high-waisted dress continued until 1808 and was often beautifully decorated with white embroidery and gold or tinsel, as shown in A, Plates XX and XXIII (see pp. 199, 218), with the frontispiece featuring a lovely white example. There were several interesting drapings, one being a cord hanging from the back of the shoulder that looped up the train of the dress, as in A, Plate XXII (see p. 215). The simple tunic shapes are better illustrated[244] by the images: more originality appeared in design after the aforementioned date. A high Vandyked lace collar and fan-like settings at the shoulders emerged, along with many interesting dresses of a plain cut, mostly in velvet and silks, worn around 1810-12. A gathered sleeve, tight at intervals, was often seen until 1816, when embroidered ruffles and frills adorned most of the necklines and skirts, while a braided style, somewhat military in appearance with beautifully piped edges, came into fashion around 1817. Spencer bodices were another point of interest during this period, and a short puff sleeve was usually banded or held with bows; these were often worn over a fairly loose long sleeve gathered by a wristband. Dresses became shorter around 1810. Charming lace and embroidered fichus crossed the shoulders, and long scarf-capes were draped around the neck, often tied behind, reminiscent of the 18th century; long capes with points and tassels in front fell to the knees, and a simple pelisse with a cape became a nice feature. Bags were always carried, with a variety of shapes seen in the plates; long gloves or mittens were typically worn. Flat-shaped parasols or others[246] with round or pagoda-shaped tops were common, many edged with a deep fringe. Long purses were often tucked into the waistband.

Fig. 109.
Fig. 109.
The pointed shoe, tied sandal fashion up the leg, and with no heel, remained through this reign, but a round-toed low shoe, tied on in the same manner, began to supersede it about 1810.
The pointed shoe, tied sandal style going up the leg, and with no heel, stayed popular throughout this period, but a round-toed low shoe, tied on in the same way, began to take over around 1810.
NINETEENTH CENTURY. GEORGE III. MALE.
Wigs had practically gone out, except for a few of the latter type of the 18th century amongst elderly people. The hair was now worn short, and left rather full on the front, with short side-whiskers. Plain black or white stocks tied with a front bow, and a starched or unstarched collar with a frilled or gathered shirt-front were in use. A tie-pin or stud was also seen in the centre of the stock or frilling.
Wigs had almost disappeared, except for a few of the later styles of the 18th century worn by older people. Hair was now kept short, with a fuller look in the front and short sideburns. Plain black or white neck stocks tied with a bow in the front, along with either a stiff or flexible collar and a frilled or gathered shirt front, were common. A tie pin or stud was also visible in the center of the neck stock or frills.
The same hats as in the latter part of the 18th century continued for a time, but the top-hat had established its favour, and assumed various shapes throughout this reign.
The same hats from the late 18th century were still around for a while, but the top hat gained popularity and took on different styles during this period.

Plate XXVI.
Plate 26.
The coats were set with very high turn-over[247] collars and a wide-shaped lapel, and the lapel of the waistcoat was still brought outside. As these lapels on the coats became smaller and changed into a roll collar, they were cut into points at the breast, as seen in the illustrations.
The coats had very high turnover[247] collars and a wide lapel, while the waistcoat's lapel was still worn outside. As the coat lapels got smaller and shifted to a roll collar, they were pointed at the chest, as shown in the illustrations.
The front of the coat cut away in a short square, rather high in the waist, which thus formed a long-tailed skirt; the fronts were made double-breasted, and were often fastened high up the lapel. The hip-pleats had gone round more to the back into a closely pressed fold, about three inches from the back-opening. Sleeves were gathered rather full in the shoulders, becoming very tight on the forearm, and were finished in a cuff, or buttoned cuff-shape. We also see that a short square coat without tails was worn over the longer one. Overcoats (or long-skirted coats) with a cape or capes, up to four, were worn all through this reign, both double and single breasted, sometimes with turn-up cuffs; but this mode was not frequently used, as a sewn-on cuff or cuff made in the sleeve was now worn, and began to take a curved shape well over the hand, with three buttons to fasten it on the outer sides.[248]
The front of the coat was cut in a short square shape, sitting high at the waist, which created a long-tailed skirt. The fronts were made double-breasted and were often buttoned high on the lapel. The hip pleats were more toward the back, forming a closely pressed fold about three inches from the back opening. The sleeves were gathered full at the shoulders, becoming very tight at the forearm, and finished with either a cuff or a buttoned cuff design. There was also a short square coat without tails worn over the longer one. Overcoats, or long-skirted coats, with one to four capes were popular throughout this period, both double and single-breasted, sometimes featuring turn-up cuffs. However, this style was not commonly used, as sewn-on cuffs or cuffs integrated into the sleeve had become more popular, taking on a curved shape over the hand with three buttons fastening on the outer sides.[248]
Short double-breasted waistcoats continued much the same, but a round-shaped lapel appeared on many.
Short double-breasted vests remained pretty much the same, but a round-shaped lapel showed up on many.
Very tight-fitting breeches were worn of the same 18th-century cut, and trousers began to gain favour; a fob of seals, &c., was always worn, coming from under the waistcoat.
Very tight-fitting pants were worn in the same 18th-century style, and trousers started to become popular; a pocket watch, etc., was always carried, peeking out from under the vest.
Soft high boots with turn-down tops, and boots with longish brown tops set low on the leg. The top-boot with the pointed or oval-shaped front and tassel still held sway, and an oval-toed low shoe with or without small latchets was in use.
Soft high boots with fold-down tops, and boots with long brown tops sitting low on the leg. The top boot featuring a pointed or oval-shaped front and a tassel was still popular, along with an oval-toed low shoe that had small fasteners or none at all.
NINETEENTH CENTURY. GEORGE IV. FEMALE.
The hair at this period was worn in plaits or curls gathered on top, and during the latter years was arranged into stiff loops set with a high comb; a group of curls was drawn to the sides of the face, the hair being mostly parted from the centre. Plumes were much used for head-dresses, and caps with gathered puffs and pointed frills. A high-crowned straw poke bonnet, tilted upwards, was still in form; but the prevailing mode was a silk[250] bonnet, with the brim curved in at the front, the sides being drawn together under the chin with a bow. The prevailing decoration was a group of feathers thrown forward or ribbon loops, and after this a large round hat, with a full gathered crown, arrived about 1827, or straw shapes, such as Fig. A, Plate XXVIII (see p. 259).
The hair during this time was styled in braids or curls piled on top, and in later years, it was arranged into stiff loops with a high comb. A section of curls framed the face, with the hair mostly parted down the middle. Feathers were commonly used for headpieces, along with caps featuring gathered puffs and pointed ruffles. A high-crowned straw poke bonnet that tilted up was still in style; however, the main trend was a silk[250] bonnet, with the brim curved inward at the front and the sides tied under the chin with a bow. The typical decoration included a cluster of feathers arranged forward or ribbon loops, and around 1827, a large round hat with a full gathered crown became popular, along with straw shapes like Fig. A, Plate XXVIII (see p. 259).

Fig. 110.
Fig. 110.
Dresses gradually assumed a longer waist, and a short pointed bodice made its appearance here and there from about 1822, when short stays began to return, and pointed belt corselets were frequent, though the waistband or sash was chiefly used. Short puffed sleeves of charming character and workmanship were sometimes set in a gauze sleeve, as in Fig. C, Plate XXIII (see p. 218). Spencers and pelisses had long sleeves coming from these short ones; they were rather full, and were caught at the wrist with a band. The upper sleeve gradually disappeared as the full-topped sleeves began to develop in size, about 1824; this fullness was often broken up into gathered parts, a tight cuff-piece usually finished at the wrist. The high set-up collars and neck-frills gave way to the flat capes about 1827, though the small ruffs were worn round the top of the high-necked[252] capes to 1830. The gathered shoulder began about 1823, and soon became a marked feature; pointed or scalloped frills and trimmings came into favour from 1825, Fig. B, Plate XXIII (see p. 218), and about 1827 the sloped appearance in the bodice began to be noticed as the sleeves were set lower. The shoulders in ball dresses were shown, and a gathered Bertha of silk or lace was arranged round the neck of bodice, Fig. D, Plate XXIV (see p. 231), or this form was made in the pattern as in Fig. C, Plate XXII (see p. 215). The V-shaped piece from the centre of waist or breast began to spread over the shoulders, where it was opened, as in Fig. B, Plate XXII (see p. 215). This V shape was often open down to the waist, where it was filled in with a centre-piece of embroidery. Skirts were gradually set out fuller, with stiff-flounced petticoats; they had various simple or richly decorated borders and fronts, or several small flounces, or one deep one often with the edges cut into divers shapes.
Dresses gradually started to have longer waists, and a short pointed bodice appeared here and there around 1822, when short stays began to make a comeback, and pointed belt corselets were common, although the waistband or sash was mainly used. Short puffed sleeves, charming in design and craftsmanship, were sometimes combined with a gauze sleeve, as shown in Fig. C, Plate XXIII (see p. 218). Spencers and pelisses featured long sleeves extending from these short ones; they were quite full and gathered at the wrist with a band. The upper sleeve gradually faded away as the full-topped sleeves began to grow in size around 1824; this fullness was often created with gathered sections, and a tight cuff usually finished at the wrist. The high set-up collars and neck frills transitioned to flat capes around 1827, although small ruffs were worn around the top of the high-necked[252] capes until 1830. Gathered shoulders began to appear around 1823 and quickly became a notable feature; pointed or scalloped frills and trimmings gained popularity from 1825, as shown in Fig. B, Plate XXIII (see p. 218), and by 1827, a sloped appearance in the bodice started to be noticed as the sleeves were set lower. Shoulders were visible in ball dresses, and a gathered Bertha of silk or lace was styled around the neck of the bodice, as seen in Fig. D, Plate XXIV (see p. 231), or this design was adjusted as shown in Fig. C, Plate XXII (see p. 215). The V-shaped piece from the center of the waist or chest began to extend over the shoulders, where it was opened, as depicted in Fig. B, Plate XXII (see p. 215). This V shape was often open down to the waist, where it was filled in with an embroidered centerpiece. Skirts gradually became fuller with stiff flounced petticoats; they featured various simple or richly decorated borders and fronts, several small flounces, or one deep flounce, often with the edges shaped in different ways.

Plate XXVII.—Outdoor Silk Dress. 1825-35.
Plate XXVII.—Outdoor Silk Dress. 1825-35.

Fig. 111.
Fig. 111.
Shoes were rather round at the toes till near the end of the reign, when they took a square shape; a tiny rosette or bow was placed at the front of instep, and they were held by narrow ribbons, crossed and tied round the ankle. Boots lacing at the inside, with seam down the front, often had a toe-cap as in Fig. 5, Plate XXI (see p. 202); no heels were worn.
Shoes were mostly rounded at the toes until near the end of the reign, when they became square-shaped; a small rosette or bow was added at the front of the instep, and they were fastened with narrow ribbons that crossed and tied around the ankle. Boots laced on the inside, featuring a seam down the front, often included a toe-cap as shown in Fig. 5, Plate XXI (see p. 202); heels were not worn.
Light gauze scarves were usually carried, and very small fans besides the larger feather ones. Bags or sachets of the forms illustrated were painted or embroidered in ribbonwork, chenille, tulle, and coloured silks.
Light gauze scarves were usually worn, along with very small fans in addition to the larger feather ones. Bags or sachets in the illustrated shapes were painted or embroidered with ribbonwork, chenille, tulle, and colored silks.
A few specimens of parasols are also given, and gloves and mittens were of the same character as in the latter part of the last reign.
A few examples of parasols are also included, and gloves and mittens were similar to those from the latter part of the previous reign.
The patterns given of some of the dresses shown in the plates will be useful as to the measurements of the increase in skirt-width and sleeves; one may also note the very pointed set-out of the breast, sometimes made with two gores, which only occurs in this reign. Muffs were usually of a large size, and a bow with long ends was often worn on the front.[254]
The patterns provided for some of the dresses featured in the images will be helpful for understanding the increased measurements of skirt width and sleeves; it’s also worth noting the distinct pointed design of the bust, sometimes created with two gores, which is unique to this era. Muffs were generally quite large, and a bow with long tails was often worn at the front.[254]
NINETEENTH CENTURY. GEORGE IV. 1820-30. MALE.
The mode in beaver hats was most varied; high straight crowns with small brims, others tapering at the top with larger curled brims, or crowns enlarging at the top with almost straight small brims; a top-hat of straw is shown on page 309. A short-crowned hat was also worn. The hair was combed towards the front at either side, and the face shaven, with the exception of short side-whiskers.
The styles of beaver hats were quite diverse; some had high, straight crowns with small brims, others tapered at the top with larger curled brims, or crowns that widened at the top with nearly straight small brims; a straw top hat is shown on page 309. A short-crowned hat was also worn. The hair was combed towards the front on each side, and the face was clean-shaven, except for short sideburns.
A very high stock of black satin or linen surrounded the throat, with or without the points of collar showing, and a frilled shirt, often stiffly goffered.
A thick layer of black satin or linen wrapped around the neck, with or without the collar points visible, and a frilled shirt, often rigidly pleated.
Coats were very tight-fitting and mostly double-breasted, with long swallow-tailed skirts, or long full skirts; the waist was rather short, and the effect of coat-front round-breasted with a high turned-over collar finished in large lapels, which were often treated with velvets. The favourite colours for overcoats were greys, buffs, greens, and blues, and the edges were neatly finished with fine cord. The sleeves, rather full in the shoulder, became tight on the[256] lower arm, coming to a curved shape well over the hand, and buttoned up the side. The pockets were frequently set at an angle, as in illustration, and a short round cape, or two, was seen on many overcoats. A short type of coat is seen about 1827, with a single roll collar.
Coats were very fitted and mostly double-breasted, featuring long swallow-tailed skirts or full skirts. The waist was quite short, giving a rounded look to the front of the coat, which had a high turned-over collar finished with large lapels, often made of velvet. The favored colors for overcoats included greys, buffs, greens, and blues, with the edges neatly finished with fine cord. The sleeves, fuller at the shoulder, tapered down to a tight fit on the lower arm, curving over the hand and buttoning up the side. The pockets were often angled, like in the illustration, and many overcoats had a short round cape or two. A shorter style of coat appeared around 1827, featuring a single roll collar.

Fig. 112.—Period 1820-1840.
Fig. 112.—Era 1820-1840.
Waistcoats mostly had a round-shaped lapel, and were often double-breasted and very shaped at the waist, which was set fairly high; a long opening allowed the frilled shirt-front full display. There were also waistcoats having no lapels, no pockets, or no cover-flap; the points of front were very small, being buttoned to the end, or, with the double-breasted shape, they were straight across.
Waistcoats typically featured rounded lapels and were often double-breasted with a fitted waist that sat quite high; a long opening showcased the frilled shirt front. There were also waistcoats without lapels, pockets, or cover-flaps; the front points were very small, buttoning all the way to the end, or in the case of the double-breasted style, they were straight across.
Breeches were not so much worn as trousers of cloth, nankeen, drill, and fine white corduroy; these were usually fastened under the boots with a strap, others were looser and often worn short, well above the ankle. A very full type in the upper part peg-tops, was in fashion about 1820-25 amongst the dandies, and for evening dress, very close-fitting breeches to the knee, or just above the ankle, the latter being opened and buttoned up to the calf. Pince-nez were favoured, with a heavy[258] black ribbon, generally worn tucked in the lapels of the waistcoat; and a fob of gold seals, &c., hung from the braces, below waistcoat pocket.
Breeches were mostly replaced by cloth trousers, nankeen, drill, and fine white corduroy; these typically had straps that fastened under the boots. Others were looser and often worn short, well above the ankle. A very full style called peg-tops was in fashion around 1820-25 among the dandies, and for evening wear, very close-fitting breeches to the knee, or just above the ankle, were popular, the latter being opened and buttoned up to the calf. Pince-nez were preferred, attached with a heavy[258] black ribbon, usually tucked into the lapels of the waistcoat; and a chain of gold seals, etc., hung from the braces below the waistcoat pocket.

Fig. 113.—1830-1840.
Fig. 113.—1830-1840.
Shoes and short Wellington boots were chiefly worn, the former being low in the heel and very short in the tongue, which was almost covered by small latchets, either buckled or tied, the shape of the toe being rather round. The Hessian boots with curved front and tassel at the top were still worn.
Shoes and short Wellington boots were mainly worn, with the shoes having low heels and very short tongues, almost covered by small straps that were either buckled or tied, and the toes being quite round. Hessian boots with a curved front and a tassel at the top were still in style.
NINETEENTH CENTURY. WILLIAM IV. FEMALE.
The hair still retained the high loops on top and the bunch of curls at the sides, poised by a back comb and set with flowers or feathers; there was also a great variety of fancy capes with pointed frills, some with long tie ends, and these are seen with most dresses, and were worn in conjunction with the hats. The favourite hat was a big, flat, circular form, generally tilted at one side, and decorated with bows, flowers, and feathers; a flat tam-o'-shanter shape was often worn with the riding-dress, sometimes with a large peak-shape in front, and straps[260] under the chin. The large poke-bonnet also kept the front as flat and round as possible, with a high crown tilted upward in order to set over the hair loops.
The hair still had the high loops on top and the bunch of curls at the sides, supported by a back comb and adorned with flowers or feathers. There was also a wide range of stylish capes with pointed ruffles, some featuring long ties, and these were commonly worn with most dresses, alongside the hats. The favorite hat was a big, flat, round style, usually tilted to one side and decorated with bows, flowers, and feathers. A flat tam-o'-shanter shape was often worn with the riding dress, sometimes with a large peak in front and straps under the chin. The large poke bonnet also maintained a flat and round front, with a high crown tilted upward to sit above the hair loops.

Plate XXVIII.
Plate 28.

Fig. 114.—1828-1836.
Fig. 114.—1828-1836.
The bodice began with a very pointed front and very low neck off the shoulders, tuck-ins of fine embroidery, and capes or fichus of the same, covered the shoulders, often three deep. The pointed bodice only lasted for a few years, when the waistband again became the favourite. The sleeves were very large at the shoulders, diminishing at the wrist, but soon took a big round form, sometimes tightly pleated into quarters before 1835. We then get the huge sleeve gathered at the wrist, and often falling below it; this again tightened on the forearm, and we note a tendency to tighter sleeves coming in before 1837, neatly gathered well down the shoulder. The evening-dress sleeve was a large puff, set out by stiffening to a flat wide effect. Very wide epaulet collars were seen on most dresses, meeting in a V shape at the waist, with a filling of lace in the front, and many bodices were elaborately gathered, and some of the sleeves were also gathered into puffs all down the arm.
The bodice started with a sharp, pointed front and a very low neckline off the shoulders, featuring fine embroidery and capes or fichus of the same material that covered the shoulders, often layered three deep. The pointed bodice was only popular for a few years before the waistband returned as the favorite style. The sleeves were very large at the shoulders and tapered down to the wrist but soon became big and rounded, sometimes tightly pleated into quarters before 1835. Following that, we saw sleeves that were huge and gathered at the wrist, often falling below it; this style transitioned to tighter sleeves on the forearm, with a trend toward tighter sleeves starting to emerge before 1837, gathered neatly well down the shoulder. The evening-dress sleeve featured a large puff, supported by stiffening for a flat, wide look. Very wide epaulet collars were common on most dresses, meeting in a V shape at the waist, with lace filling the front, and many bodices were elaborately gathered, with some sleeves also gathered into puffs all the way down the arm.

Fig. 115.—1830-1840.
Fig. 115.—1830-1840.
[262]The skirts were set out very full over stiff flounced petticoats, and were worn rather short; as a rule they were trimmed with one or two flounces, which were handsomely decorated, and a short polonaise is occasionally seen. There were many interesting trimmings of gauze, flowers, and bows; while silk-flowered gauze over dresses made some charming effects.
[262]The skirts were styled to be quite voluminous over stiff, layered petticoats, and they were typically worn short. They were usually adorned with one or two decorative flounces, which were beautifully embellished, and occasionally a short polonaise could be seen. There were various appealing embellishments made of gauze, flowers, and bows; while silk-flowered gauze over dresses created some lovely looks.
Heavy mantles and capes or pelisses began to be braided, and rather strong colours were in general taste.
Heavy cloaks and capes or overcoats started to be braided, and bolder colors became popular.
The hand-bags were of a curved form and generally bore heavy tassels. Very small fans and round fans were attractive, and bouquet-holders of gilt, with pearl handles, became the thing to carry.
The handbags were curved in shape and usually had heavy tassels. Very small fans and round fans looked nice, and bouquet-holders made of gold with pearl handles became the must-have accessory.
Shoes were of the low sandal type, fastened by crossed elastic, with very square toes, and a tiny rosette or bow on the front; boots to the ankle were now in fashion, mostly lacing at the inside, and having a long toe-cap, sometimes with a small rosette at the top of this or a tassel at front of the top of the boot.
Shoes were low sandals secured by crossed elastic straps, featuring very square toes and a small rosette or bow at the front. Ankle boots were now in style, mainly lacing on the inside, with a long toe cap, sometimes adorned with a small rosette at the top or a tassel at the front of the boot.

Plate XXIX.
Plate 29.
- (a) Embroidered Silk Gauze Dress. 1820-30.
- (b) Gauze Dress with Appliqued Design. 1825-35.
- (c) Printed Linen Outdoor Dress. 1827-47 (Pattern, see p. 342).
[263]NINETEENTH CENTURY. WILLIAM IV. MALE.
The hair was worn rather full in curls at the sides or on top, parted at the left side, besides being occasionally parted at the centre. Side whiskers, curved forward, still continued, and a short trimmed beard was now worn round under the chin by many, moustaches also made their first appearance at the end of this reign. Top-hats were high and straight, but many still adhered to the tapered crown and larger brim.
The hair was styled in full curls on the sides or on top, usually parted to the left, and sometimes parted in the middle. Sideburns, curved forward, were still common, and many now sported a short trimmed beard around the chin, with mustaches making their debut at the end of this era. Top hats were tall and straight, but many still preferred the tapered crown and wider brim.
The same plain stocks of black satin continued, with or without a front bow, and a soft pleated or frilled shirt-front.
The same simple black satin stocks remained, with or without a front bow, and a soft pleated or frilled shirt front.
The coats were similar to the last reign: the chief differences being an increase in the length of the waist, wider tails, and large lapels of a similar cut: velvet collars and cuffs were much worn, and the waist was still made tight. A coat with a square skirt as in Fig. 116 is seen for the first time, and the swallow-tailed coat was worn not quite so long. A lower opening to the waistcoat was generally seen in evening attire, which sometimes had but four small[264] buttons, while more of the single-breasted type were in use, with and without lapels.
The coats were similar to those from the last era, with the main changes being longer waists, wider tails, and larger lapels of a similar style. Velvet collars and cuffs were popular, and the waist remained fitted. A coat with a square skirt, like in Fig. 116, is seen for the first time, and the swallow-tailed coat was worn slightly shorter. Evening attire generally featured a lower cut for the waistcoat, which sometimes had just four small[264] buttons, while more single-breasted styles were in use, both with and without lapels.
Very tight trousers to the ankle buttoned up to the calf continued, or plain trousers were held by straps under the boot; twill, corduroy, or nankeen were both strapped or free at the ankle and rather short. Knee-breeches were still worn by many for evening dress, and long Italian capes with overcapes and high turn-over collars were fashionable, besides the very full-skirted greatcoat.
Very tight pants that reach the ankles and buttoned up to the calves continued, or plain trousers were held by straps under the boots; twill, corduroy, or nankeen were either strapped or loose at the ankles and relatively short. Knee-breeches were still worn by many for evening attire, and long Italian capes with overcapes and high turned-down collars were in style, along with the very full-skirted greatcoat.
Boots and shoes were square at the toes and rather long and narrow, the shoes having a bow or buckle. Short Wellington boots continued much in use, also spats.
Boots and shoes had square toes and were pretty long and narrow, with shoes featuring a bow or buckle. Short Wellington boots were still commonly used, along with spats.
Fobs of gold seals, &c., were worn, and eye-glasses attached to a black ribbon is a noticeable feature.
Fobs with gold seals, etc., were worn, and eyeglasses attached to a black ribbon are a noticeable feature.
NINETEENTH CENTURY. VICTORIA. FEMALE.
The hair was parted in the centre and tightened in a top setting of plaits, with side curls over the ears. This mode was retained by many till the fifties, but the top plaits began to be set lower at the back, and the same flat parted hair was[266] brought in a curved shape to the front of the ears, often in a small plait, allowing the ear to show, or in a plaited knot at either side; about 1850 it was waved, parted, and simply curved from the forehead over the ears in a fuller manner, sometimes being turned under to increase the side fullness, while the back hair was arranged lower down the neck. In the sixties the hair was waved and caught behind in ringlets or was bunched into the hideous chignons, which are seen till about 1880.
The hair was parted in the middle and styled in a top section of braids, with curls framing the ears. This style was popular for many until the 1850s, but the top braids started to be placed lower at the back, and the same flat parted hair was[266] shaped into a curve at the front of the ears, often in a small braid, allowing the ear to show, or in a braided bun on either side; around 1850, it was waved, parted, and simply curved from the forehead over the ears more fully, sometimes turned under to enhance the side volume, while the hair in the back was styled lower down the neck. In the 1860s, the hair was waved and pulled back into ringlets or gathered into the unattractive chignons, which remained popular until about 1880.

Fig. 116.—1840-1860.
Fig. 116.—1840-1860.
The variety of caps and hats is too alarming to deal with, and baffles comprehensible description, so it is best for the student to dip into the hundreds of illustrations through this period in the Ladies' Magazine, Punch, the Illustrated London News, or the Ladies' Treasury for the later styles.
The variety of caps and hats is overwhelming and defies clear explanation, so it’s best for the reader to explore the hundreds of illustrations from this period in the Ladies' Magazine, Punch, the Illustrated London News, or the Ladies' Treasury for the more recent styles.
The straw bonnet with a straighter poke front was favoured till 1850, when the front became considerably reduced in size and fitted closely round the face. The larger brimmed bonnets had a little frill by the ears, and the tight-brimmed bonnet often had the frill all round with a flower also tucked in effectively to the wearer's taste, and we see this favoured till the[268] seventies. In the fifties a large flat Leghorn hat with a small crown was in evidence, the brim dipping back and front, decorated with feathers or bows, and a three-cornered French hat with feathers set in the brim came in with revival of the 18th-century style about 1860. A small bowler hat and a very small "pork-pie" hat appears in the late sixties, and a tiny-shaped bonnet of a curved form during the seventies.
The straw bonnet with a straighter front was popular until 1850, when the front got smaller and fit snugly around the face. The larger-brimmed bonnets had a little frill near the ears, and the tight-brimmed bonnet often had the frill all around with a flower tucked in to suit the wearer's taste, which remained popular until the[268] seventies. In the fifties, a large flat Leghorn hat with a small crown was common, with the brim dipping both back and front, decorated with feathers or bows. A three-cornered French hat with feathers in the brim made a comeback with the revival of the 18th-century style around 1860. A small bowler hat and a very small "pork-pie" hat appeared in the late sixties, along with a tiny, curved bonnet during the seventies.

Plate XXX.
Plate 30.
- (a) Printed Silk Bodice. 1840-50. (Pattern, see p. 320.)
- (b) Gathered Linen Bodice. 1837-47.
- (c) Silk Bodice and Bertha. 1845-55.

Fig. 117.—1845-1855.
Fig. 117.—1845-1855.
At the beginning of this long reign we find the pointed bodice with a normal length of waist has really come to stay, though many dresses retain the waistband till the fifties, and there is such a confusion of styles at that time, it is difficult to arrange a sequence. From the 18th century fashions became more complicated in the greater variety of design, each overlapping the other, and several distinct forms of character come and go during this long reign. I do not envy the person who undertakes the chronology of our present period.
At the start of this lengthy reign, we see that the fitted bodice with a regular waistline has truly become a staple, even though many dresses keep the waistband until the 1950s. There was such a mix of styles during that time that it’s hard to establish a clear sequence. From the 18th century onward, fashion became more complex with a wider range of designs, each influencing the others, and several distinct styles emerge and fade away throughout this long reign. I don't envy anyone trying to create a timeline for this current period.
At the commencement in 1837 the huge sleeves gathered at the wrist were still in evidence, especially as a gauze oversleeve to evening attire, and they continued thus[269] to the fifties, but very large sleeves were really dying out and the usual reaction was setting in; the full-shouldered sleeve had turned a somersault and was neatly gathered tight from the shoulder to the elbow, the fullness falling on the forearm, and this was gathered into a tight setting or wristband. The V-shaped front to the bodice was kept in many dresses by a collar or two tapering from the shoulders to the waist, the fullness of the breast often being tightly gathered at the shoulders, besides a few inches in the front point of the bodice. A very plain tight-fitting sleeve became fashionable, and on most of these we find a small upper sleeve or a double one as shown in A, Plate XXX (see p. 266); this was sometimes opened at the outer side. These sleeves continued till about 1852. In 1853 a bell-shaped sleeve is noticed in ordinary dress, and this continued in various sizes till 1875, reaching its fuller shape about 1864. These types of sleeves were usually worn over a tight one or a full lawn sleeve gathered at the wrist; most bodices with this sleeve were closely fitted and high in the neck, the waist often being cut into small tabs. We also notice for a few years in the early fifties the[270] deeper part of the bell curved to the front of the arm, giving a very ugly appearance. A close-fitting jacket also came into evidence till about 1865 with tight sleeves and cuffs, sometimes with a little turn-down collar and a longer skirt as in Fig. C, Plate XXXIII (see p. 282). This particularly fine embroidered specimen, in imitation of the 18th-century style, is interestingly cut away short at the back to allow for better setting on the crinoline. There is another type of sleeve seen about 1848, of a plain, full, square cut; these became varied in shape, being opened up the side and generally trimmed with wide braids. This clumsy character is seen up to 1878, the later ones being fuller in cut. Zouave jackets were occasionally worn in the forties and later in the early sixties, when the wide corselet belt was again favoured. Skirts at the beginning of the reign were fully set out on drill petticoats, stiff flounces, and even whalebone, so it was hardly "a great effect" when the crinoline appeared about 1855, though a furious attack was made against it at first; this undersetting developed to its fullest extent between 1857 and 1864, and many dresses in the early sixties[271] were also worn short, showing the high boots of this period. At first the crinoline was slightly held back from the front by ties, and again in the sixties it was often kept with a straight front, the fullness being held to the back, till the appearance of the bustle brought in another shape. The skirts were now pulled in tight to the front of the figure and bunched up at the back, with a train or shaped flounced pieces overlapping each other caught up under the bustle, as in Fig. B, Plate XXXIII (see p. 282).
At the start in 1837, large sleeves gathered at the wrist were still popular, especially as gauzy oversleeves for evening wear, and they continued like this[269] until the 1850s. However, very large sleeves were starting to fade out, and a typical trend was emerging. The fuller sleeves changed shape and became neatly gathered tight from the shoulder to the elbow, with the fullness on the forearm gathered into a tight wristband. The V-shaped front of the bodice was often maintained by one or two collars that tapered from the shoulders to the waist, with the fullness at the bust tightly gathered at the shoulders, along with a few inches at the front point of the bodice. A plain, close-fitting sleeve became fashionable, and on most of these, there was either a small upper sleeve or a double sleeve as shown in A, Plate XXX (see p. 266); these were sometimes opened on the outer side. These sleeve styles lasted until about 1852. In 1853, a bell-shaped sleeve appeared in everyday wear, which varied in size until 1875, reaching its fullest shape around 1864. These sleeves were typically worn over a tight-fitting sleeve or a full lawn sleeve gathered at the wrist; most bodices with this sleeve were closely fitted and high-necked, often featuring small tabs at the waist. We also noticed for a few years in the early 1850s that the deeper part of the bell curved toward the front of the arm, creating an unattractive look. A fitted jacket emerged around this time, lasting until about 1865, featuring tight sleeves and cuffs, and sometimes incorporating a small turn-down collar and a longer skirt, as shown in Fig. C, Plate XXXIII (see p. 282). This particularly fine embroidered piece, mimicking the 18th-century style, is interestingly cut short at the back to better accommodate the crinoline. Another type of sleeve seen around 1848 had a plain, full, square cut; these varied in shape, often opened at the side and typically trimmed with wide braids. This bulky style persisted until 1878, with later versions being fuller. Zouave jackets were occasionally worn in the 1840s and again in the early 1860s when the wide corselet belt was back in style. At the beginning of this period, skirts were fully flared on drill petticoats, stiff flounces, and even whalebone, so the introduction of crinolines around 1855 didn’t seem like "a great effect," despite the initial backlash against it. This undersetting evolved to its fullest form between 1857 and 1864, and many dresses from the early 1860s[271] were also worn short, showcasing the high boots of that era. Initially, the crinoline was held slightly back from the front by ties, and again in the 1860s, it was often styled with a straight front, with fullness gathered to the back until the bustle introduced a new silhouette. Skirts were now pulled tight to the front and bunched up at the back, with trains or shaped flounces overlapping each other caught beneath the bustle, as shown in Fig. B, Plate XXXIII (see p. 282).

Plate XXXI.
Plate 31.
- (a) Embroidered Muslin Outdoor Dress, 1855-65.
- (b) Riding Habit. 1845-75.
- (c) Gauze Ball Dress. 1840-55.

Fig. 118.—Dress improvers, 1865-1875.
Fig. 118.—Dress accessories, 1865-1875.
Mantles of a cumbersome type and shot-silk capes with long pointed fronts were[272] worn, often heavily fringed, the former also being mostly decorated with braided designs. Large Paisley shawls were much used all through this reign, besides the cape and hood with its fine tassels which became very fashionable in the sixties.
Mantles that were heavy and shot-silk capes with long pointed fronts were[272] worn, often with heavy fringes, and the former typically featured braided designs. Large Paisley shawls were popular throughout this reign, in addition to the cape and hood with its elegant tassels, which became very trendy in the sixties.
Gloves and mittens are seen both long and short, the latter often beautifully embroidered on the back in the French style. Hand-bags were often carried, of which examples are given in the plates of a variety of shapes; the favourite materials for their make were velvets and silks decorated with bullion, sequins, braids, needlework, and beads, and these bags were richly set in gilt, silver, or steel mounts.
Gloves and mittens come in both long and short styles, with the shorter ones often featuring beautiful embroidery on the back in the French style. Handbags were commonly carried, with examples shown in the plates showcasing a variety of shapes; the preferred materials for making them were velvets and silks adorned with gold thread, sequins, braids, embroidery, and beads, and these bags were often beautifully accented with gold, silver, or steel fittings.
Parasols were still heavily fringed, and were of the usual shapes. A very small one was carried in the carriages, and are even seen on the ladies' driving whips.
Parasols still had lots of fringe and came in the usual shapes. A very small one was carried in the carriages and could even be seen on the ladies' driving whips.
Shoes continued in the same heelless sandal character to the sixties for evening wear, but from the forties most outdoor shoes had a heel and large rosettes. With the seventies came round toes with a low round front and bow, and high shaped heels came to stay till the present day. Boots of white satin, kid, or coloured silks were chiefly worn till the seventies,[273] reaching just above the ankle, laced up the inner side, but many wore elastic sides from the fifties; the toes of these were rather square, and a toe-cap and front seam was made in many of this type. In the forties a tight rosette was sometimes placed low down towards the toes, and later, a huge bow was sewn on the front. High boots buttoned towards the side and very much shaped, with pointed round toes and high heels were sometimes laced and finished with a pair of tassels. Spats were always fashionable through this period.
Shoes kept the same heelless sandal style into the sixties for evening wear, but from the forties on, most outdoor shoes featured a heel and large rosettes. In the seventies, round toes with a low round front and a bow became popular, and high shaped heels remained in style until today. Boots made of white satin, kid leather, or colorful silks were mainly worn until the seventies,[273] reaching just above the ankle and laced up the inner side, though many opted for elastic sides starting in the fifties; these had rather square toes, and many featured a toe-cap and front seam. In the forties, a tight rosette was sometimes placed low down near the toes, and later, a large bow was added to the front. High boots buttoned on the side and were very shaped, with pointed round toes and high heels, sometimes laced and finished with a pair of tassels. Spats remained fashionable throughout this time.
NINETEENTH CENTURY. VICTORIA. MALE.
The same modes of doing the hair remained till the sixties, parted at one side and worn rather long and waved, with the side whiskers or beard all round the chin. The side whiskers were allowed to grow long between fifty-five and seventy, and full beards also became fashionable, while the hair was parted in the centre from front to back and flattened on the forehead.
The same hairstyles stayed in style until the sixties, with hair parted to one side and styled long and wavy, accompanied by sideburns or a beard around the chin. Between the ages of fifty-five and seventy, sideburns grew longer and full beards became trendy, while hair was parted down the middle from front to back and laid flat on the forehead.
The favourite top-hat still reigned supreme, many of which retained the[274] tapered top and large curled brim till about 1855, and a bell shape was frequently seen in the fifties, but the real straight chimney shape was seen throughout till the eighties, with a rather narrow brim, and often of white or fawn-coloured cloth. The bowler hat increased in appreciation, being of a short type, with smallish brim. A short flat felt hat, with rather straight brim, also came into favour from the fifties; little round caps and caps with ear-flaps, for travelling, &c., were also in general use.
The favorite top hat still held the top spot, many of which kept the[274] tapered top and large curled brim until around 1855. A bell shape was often seen in the fifties, but the classic straight chimney shape persisted throughout the eighties, featuring a fairly narrow brim, usually made of white or fawn-colored cloth. The bowler hat gained popularity as a shorter style with a small brim. A short flat felt hat with a fairly straight brim also became trendy starting in the fifties; little round caps and hats with ear flaps for traveling, etc., were also commonly worn.
The frock-coat kept the rather tight sleeves and tight waist, and full square skirt, with back pockets, also a deep lapel, sometimes with a velvet collar, and small cuffs; a breast-pocket was often placed on the left side, and in the fifties the type of morning coat with rounded-off fronts at the skirt appeared, also a small collar and lapel. Square-cut jackets and tweed suits similar to our present shapes, but heavier in cut and with braided edges, were much in use. Velvet or fur-trimmed overcoats, and heavy travelling-coats, also capes and Inverness capes, were all in vogue.
The frock coat had fairly snug sleeves and a fitted waist, along with a full square skirt and back pockets. It also featured a deep lapel, sometimes with a velvet collar, and small cuffs. A breast pocket was usually on the left side, and in the fifties, a style of morning coat with rounded fronts at the skirt became popular, which also included a small collar and lapel. Square-cut jackets and tweed suits that resemble today's styles, but were heavier and had braided edges, were commonly worn. Velvet or fur-trimmed overcoats, heavy travel coats, capes, and Inverness capes were all in style.
Waistcoats became buttoned higher in the[275] neck, and the stock-collar was supplanted in the sixties by a turn-down collar, and small tie or loose bow; many still affected the black stock and pointed collar to the seventies, when a high round collar began to appear.
Waistcoats started to be buttoned higher at the neck, and in the sixties, the stock-collar was replaced by a turn-down collar, along with a small tie or loose bow. Many still preferred the black stock and pointed collar until the seventies, when a high round collar began to show up.
Coloured and fancy waistcoats were much worn till the eighties, and evening dress was similar to the present cut, with slight differences in the length of lapels and waistcoat front.
Coloured and stylish waistcoats were commonly worn until the 1980s, and evening attire was similar to today's style, with minor differences in the length of lapels and the front of the waistcoat.
The trousers were made with the front flap till they were buttoned down the front about 1845, and side pockets became general. Braids may be noted down the sides in the fifties, and are seen now and then all through the reign, while large plaids and stripes were highly esteemed.
The pants had a front flap until they were buttoned down the front around 1845, and side pockets became common. Braids can be seen down the sides in the 1850s and appeared occasionally throughout the period, while large plaids and stripes were very popular.
Short Wellington boots were chiefly preferred up to the sixties, and trouser-straps and spats were fashionable all through the reign. The heavier lace-up boot came in during the fifties, and a very shaped type of fashion appeared in the sixties.
Short Wellington boots were mainly favored until the sixties, and trouser-straps and spats were trendy throughout that time. The sturdier lace-up boot emerged in the fifties, and a distinctly shaped style appeared in the sixties.
Having now completed the general survey of Costume, the following pages are given up to the cut and measurements of various antique garments.
Having now finished the overall overview of Costume, the following pages are dedicated to the cuts and measurements of different antique garments.
PATTERNS OF VARIOUS REIGNS FROM ANTIQUE COSTUME[276]
With Notes and Measurements
With Notes and Measurements
I have striven to gather as many representative patterns of dress types and accessories as possible, and also give many measurements from the various examples, when I have been unable to obtain a complete pattern. The character of cut and proportion is the essential point in the study of dress design, and the intimate knowledge of periods. When seeing a collection of patterns, one is astonished at the great variety in cut used to arrive at the different bodice types. Several patterns of single pieces are given, as it aids one to find the fellow-part; for example, the photo of a back given in Fig. C, Plate III (see p. 55), will go with the front cut on page 290; even though these two pieces did not belong to the same body, the cut is seen from[277] which to design the missing part. Often a small piece is wanting for the top of the shoulder, which can easily be supplied to fill the sleeve measurement. The types of trimmings in the different centuries will soon be acquired by a careful student, and the proportions of patterns will be valued for gaining the character. I believe with this collection one could get the true effects of any style of dress seen in the period prints. The drawings are mostly scaled for the half, and the measurement, in inches, will be found by dots on the top of the collotypes, and by a marked line on the pattern pages.
I’ve worked hard to gather as many representative types of clothing and accessories as I could, and I’ve included many measurements from the various examples when I couldn’t get a complete pattern. The key aspects in studying dress design are the cut and proportions, along with a deep understanding of different periods. When you look at a collection of patterns, you’re amazed at the variety of cuts used to create different bodice styles. I’ve included several single-piece patterns, as they help you find the corresponding part; for example, the photo of a back shown in Fig. C, Plate III (see p. 55) will match with the front cut on page 290; even though these two pieces didn’t originally belong to the same garment, you can see from[277] how to design the missing part. Often a small piece for the top of the shoulder is missing, which can be easily added to complete the sleeve measurement. A diligent student will quickly learn about the various types of trimmings used throughout the centuries, and the proportions of patterns will help capture the character of the styles. I believe this collection will allow you to achieve the true effects of any style of dress seen in period prints. The drawings are mostly scaled to half, and the measurements in inches can be found by dots on the top of the collotypes and by a marked line on the pattern pages.
One must note, with the 18th-century dress, the sleeve cuffs can be changed, so I give, on page 300, a full-size measurement of the elbow-cuff seen in Fig. A, Plate XVI (see p. 167), and a deeper one of this style is seen on Fig. C, Plate XII (see p. 135), gathered seven times at the elbow. The plain square type was pleated in the front as given on page 300, and a variety of this character is shown on Fig. B, Plate XV (see p. 154). Though many patterns may be found remarkable in proportions, an allowance is often to be made for the undersetting, as well as for the thick,[278] straight corsets worn to the end of the 18th century.
One should note that with the 18th-century dress, the sleeve cuffs can be changed. So, I provide, on page 300, a full-size measurement of the elbow cuff shown in Fig. A, Plate XVI (see p. 167), and a deeper version of this style is seen in Fig. C, Plate XII (see p. 135), which is gathered seven times at the elbow. The plain square type was pleated at the front as shown on page 300, and a variation of this style is illustrated in Fig. B, Plate XV (see p. 154). While many patterns may seem remarkable in proportions, adjustments often need to be made for the undersetting, as well as for the thick, [278] straight corsets worn until the end of the 18th century.
I give several specimens of quilting on petticoats of the 18th century, which will probably be found useful to artists; the measurement is also given of their circumference, which attained similar proportions to those set on the Victorian crinolines, going 3 to 4 yards round: four 18th century ones measured 100, 114, 116, 120 inches, and they are often 1 inch longer at the sides, to allow for setting over the panniers; a pattern is given on pages 213 and 332. The embroidered pockets on page 300 were worn in pairs at the sides on the petticoats, and only showed when the dress was looped up. The extra lawn sleeves, given on page 287, show how precious the superfine linen was held, with its superb gathered work, lace ruffles, and often fine embroidery; these pieces could be looked after with special care in the laundry, and could be tacked, pinned, or buttoned on when required.
I provide several examples of quilting on 18th-century petticoats, which artists might find useful. The measurements of their circumference are included, reaching similar sizes to those of Victorian crinolines, which were about 3 to 4 yards around. Four 18th-century petticoats measured 100, 114, 116, and 120 inches, and they often had an extra inch added at the sides to accommodate the panniers. A pattern can be found on pages 213 and 332. The embroidered pockets shown on page 300 were worn in pairs on the sides of the petticoats and were only visible when the dress was looped up. The additional lawn sleeves, detailed on page 287, demonstrate how highly the superfine linen was regarded, featuring exquisite gathered work, lace ruffles, and often fine embroidery. These pieces required special care in laundry and could be tacked, pinned, or buttoned on as needed.
The 16th and 17th century collars were mostly attached to the chemise or shirt, as is seen in many of the old prints. On page 289 I give examples of shape of the various stomachers, which will be found[279] useful for getting the characteristic proportions. The scarves worn round the body of the 17th century cavaliers were from 2 feet 3 inches wide to 3 feet 6 inches, and from 8 feet 6 inches to 7 feet in length.
The collars from the 16th and 17th centuries were typically attached to the chemise or shirt, as shown in many old prints. On page 289 I provide examples of the shapes of various stomachers, which will be[279] useful for understanding the characteristic proportions. The scarves worn around the bodies of 17th-century cavaliers measured between 2 feet 3 inches and 3 feet 6 inches wide, and ranged from 8 feet 6 inches to 7 feet in length.

Plate XXXII.
Plate 32.
The stocking top, Fig. C, Plate VI (see p. 74), is probably of similar proportions to the woollen one in the Victoria and Albert Museum, on which the bell-top circumference is 36 inches, and the full length of stocking 38 inches. On page 285 a cap of three pieces is given; their real design is at present unknown, but I trust the Museum authorities may soon discover their placing, for many of these pieces are in existence, and this set in my collection is impressed with a beautiful pattern. The bodice, Fig A, Plate X (see p. 119), should have been set on a stiff-fronted corset to give it the straight style, as it is charmingly proportioned and clean in outline. I have also measured a short circular cloak of the early 17th century, which is 34 inches in diameter, with a square collar 10 inches deep; and another cape of the late 16th century, 40 inches in diameter. On page 290 will be found the smaller tabs which are placed round the jerkin, with a deep front point, as in[280] Fig. A, Plate VIIIa (see p. 103); the collar of this type often rises 2¾ inches in the front to 3 inches at the back, in order to carry the stiff ruff or deep turned-down collar. Tabs of the smallest dimensions, in the earlier Elizabeth and James character, generally have six pieces from front to the middle of the back, which are from 2 to 3 inches deep. The epaulets are made in small stiff tabs, caught together in two places only, and so have plenty of give in the shoulder movements; they run to 2¼ inches at the widest part, and do not continue right under the arm. Fig. D, Plate V (see p. 71), has the middle seam of the back open from the waist to within 2 inches of the collar, which is noticeable on many of the later Charles I coats. Long aprons are conspicuous through the 17th century, and one measured was 42 inches wide, gathered to 15 inches at the waist; they were decorated with three bands of embroidered insertion down the front, with a 3-inch plain border, edged with small lace; this is typical in character of design, as is also the same style of linen cape seen on a figure, page 159. A similar one, lent by Sir Robert Filmer, is at the Victoria and Albert Museum; also a cap,[281] of which I give a pattern, A, page 285. The smaller type of embroidered aprons of the late 17th and 18th centuries measure 40 inches wide, 19½ inches deep, with the centre dipping to 17¾ inches; another shape is 26 inches wide, 18 inches in centre, and 13½ inches on sides. The bodice, with deep skirt, Fig. B, Plate XVIII (see p. 183), is a type seen all through the 18th century, both longer and shorter in the skirt. The pattern of the 17th-century breeches is interesting as regards the cut, the upper part being kept plain, otherwise the gathered fullness would have disturbed the set of the jerkin tabs; the band of these breeches has six hooks either side to back, which fasten to eyes on an under flap sewn on body of jerkin. The epaulet on this pattern is only a ¾-inch piece, braided with two narrow braids, and the bows on tabs are of ribbon, 1½ inches wide.
The top of the stocking, Fig. C, Plate VI (see p. 74), is likely comparable in size to the woolen one in the Victoria and Albert Museum, where the bell-top circumference measures 36 inches and the full length of the stocking is 38 inches. On page 285, a three-piece cap is shown; its true design is currently unknown, but I hope the Museum authorities will discover its use soon, as many of these pieces still exist, and the set in my collection features a beautiful pattern. The bodice, Fig A, Plate X (see p. 119), should have been fitted onto a stiff-front corset to achieve a straight silhouette, as it is beautifully proportioned and has a clean outline. I have also measured a short circular cloak from the early 17th century, measuring 34 inches in diameter, with a square collar that's 10 inches deep; and another cape from the late 16th century, which is 40 inches in diameter. On page 290, you can find the smaller tabs that are placed around the jerkin, featuring a deep front point, as in[280] Fig. A, Plate VIIIa (see p. 103); the collar of this type often rises to 2¾ inches in the front and 3 inches in the back, designed to support a stiff ruff or a deep turned-down collar. The smallest tabs, from the earlier Elizabethan and Jacobean style, usually consist of six pieces from the front to the middle of the back, measuring 2 to 3 inches deep. The epaulets are made of small stiff tabs, connected in only two places, allowing for flexibility in shoulder movements; they extend to 2¼ inches at the widest point and do not continue under the arm. Fig. D, Plate V (see p. 71), features a back seam that's open from the waist to within 2 inches of the collar, which is a common detail found in many of the later Charles I coats. Long aprons were prominent throughout the 17th century, with one example measuring 42 inches wide, gathered to 15 inches at the waist; these were decorated with three bands of embroidered insertion down the front, bordered with a 3-inch plain strip edged with small lace; this design is typical, as is the same style of linen cape seen on a figure on page 159. A similar cape, lent by Sir Robert Filmer, is housed in the Victoria and Albert Museum, along with a cap,[281] for which I provide a pattern, A, on page 285. The smaller embroidered aprons from the late 17th and 18th centuries measure 40 inches wide, 19½ inches deep, with the center dipping to 17¾ inches; another style measures 26 inches wide, 18 inches in the center, and 13½ inches on the sides. The bodice, with a deep skirt, Fig. B, Plate XVIII (see p. 183), is a style seen throughout the 18th century, appearing both longer and shorter in the skirt. The pattern of the 17th-century breeches is intriguing regarding the cut, with the upper part kept plain to prevent the gathered fullness from disrupting the alignment of the jerkin tabs; the waistband of these breeches features six hooks on each side fastened to eyes on an under-flap sewn onto the bodice of the jerkin. The epaulet in this design is just a ¾-inch piece, braided with two narrow braids, and the bows on the tabs are made of ribbon measuring 1½ inches wide.
The three patterns of capes given on pages 349, 350 will be found useful, as they are simple and very typical of the Victorian times, long shawls being otherwise much used. The fullness of the Elizabethan overdress seen on B, Plate II (see p. 42), is 66 inches to the back seam, and the[282] Fig. C, on the same plate, is 47 inches. The "jump," or jacket, Fig. A, Plate III (see p. 55), is 100 inches round, the fullness of the sleeve 13 inches, and the length of back 32 inches. An over-tunic of the early 17th century is interesting to examine, though it is a specimen of German costume.
The three cape patterns provided on pages 349 and 350 will be useful, as they are simple and very typical of Victorian times, when long shawls were also commonly used. The fullness of the Elizabethan overdress shown in B, Plate II (see p. 42) is 66 inches at the back seam, while Fig. C on the same plate is 47 inches. The "jump," or jacket, in Fig. A, Plate III (see p. 55) is 100 inches around, with a sleeve fullness of 13 inches and a back length of 32 inches. An over-tunic from the early 17th century is interesting to consider, although it represents German costume.

Plate XXXIII.
Plate 33.
- (a) Silk Dress with Court Train. 1828-38.
- (b) Silk Afternoon Dress. 1872-78.
- (c) Silk Coat and Skirt. 1855-65. Pattern, see p. 320.
PATTERNS TO SCALE[283]

Pattern 1.
Pattern 1.

Pattern 2.
Pattern 2.

Pattern 3.
Pattern 3.

Pattern 4.
Pattern 4.

Pattern 5.
Pattern 5.

Pattern 6.
Pattern 6.

Pattern 7.
Pattern 7.

See page opposite for Breeches of same, 1620-1640. Victoria and Albert Museum, Kensington.
See the page opposite for breeches from 1620-1640. Victoria and Albert Museum, Kensington.
Pattern 10.
Pattern 10.

Pattern 11.
Pattern 11.

Pattern 12.
Pattern 12.

Pattern 14.
Pattern 14.

Pattern 17.
Pattern 17.

Pattern 18.
Pattern 18.

Pattern 19.
Pattern 19.

Pattern 20.
Pattern 20.

Pattern 21.
Pattern 21.

Pattern 22.
Pattern 22.

Pattern 25.
Pattern 25.
Fig. A, Plate 15
Coat, 1775-90
Fig. A, Plate __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
Coat, 1775-90

Pattern 26.
Pattern 26.

Pattern 27.
Pattern 27.

Pattern 28.
Pattern 28.

Pattern 30.
Pattern 30.

Pattern 31.
Pattern 31.

Pattern 33.
Pattern 33.

Pattern 34.
Pattern 34.
Jacket bodice, Fig. A, Plate 24
Jacket bodice, Fig. A, Plate __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

Pattern 35.
Pattern 35.

Pattern 36.
Pattern 36.

Pattern 37.
Pattern 37.

Pattern 39.
Pattern 39.

Pattern 40.
Pattern 40.
Pattern, Fig. C, Plate 28
Pattern, Fig. C, Plate __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
Bodice, Fig. A, Plate 18
Bodice, Fig. A, Plate __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

Pattern 41.
Pattern 41.

Pattern 42.
Pattern 42.
Silk jacket, Fig. B, Plate 19
Silk jacket, Fig. B, Plate __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

Pattern 46.
Pattern 46.

Pattern 47.
Pattern 47.

Pattern 48.
Pattern 48.

Pattern 52.
Pattern 52.

Pattern 53.
Pattern 53.

Pattern 54.
Pattern 54.

Pattern 56.
Pattern 56.

Pattern 57.
Pattern 57.

Pattern 61.
Pattern 61.

Pattern 62.
Pattern 62.

Pattern 63.
Pattern 63.

Pattern 64.
Pattern 64.
Lady's jacket, Fig. C, Plate 19
Women's jacket, Fig. C, Plate __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

Pattern 65.
Pattern 65.

Pattern 66.
Pattern 66.

Pattern 67.
Pattern 67.

Pattern 68.
Pattern 68.
DETAILED LIST OF SCALED PATTERNS[353]
Pattern 1, page 285:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 285:—
- Piccadillo, 1580-1630.
- Three caps, 16-17 century.
- Cap of three pieces, 16-17 c.
- Triangular cap, 16-17 c.
- Long cap, 17 c.
- Cap, late 17 c., early 18 c.
Pattern 2, page 286:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 286:—
- 4 collars, 17 c.
- Gorget of linen, 17 c.
- 2 stocks, 17 and 18 c.
- 3 male caps and 1 female, 17 and 18 c.
Pattern 3, page 287:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 287:—
- Ruff, 17 c.
- 4 extra linen sleeves, 17 and one 18 c.
- 2 caps, female, 17 c.
Pattern 4, page 288:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 288:—
- Front of linen jacket, 16 c.
- Front of linen bodice, Charles I.
Pattern 5, page 289:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 289:—
- Elizabethan jerkin.
- 4 stomachers, 17 and 18 c.
- Set of tabs for male jerkin, 17 c.
- Pattern type, sleeve and bodice front, 1570-1605.
Pattern 7, page 291:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 291:—
- Circular cape, 17 c.
- Cap, female, 1580-1630.
Pattern 8, page 292:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 292:—
- Bodice, Fig. 1, Plate X, James I.
Pattern 9, page 293:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 293:—
- 3 corsets and bodice of, Fig. 2, Plate V, 17 c.
Pattern 10, page 294:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 294:—
- Jerkin of white quilted satin, 17 c.
Pattern 11, page 295:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 295:—
- Breeches of same suit.
Pattern 12, page 296:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 296:—
- Cape-coat, 17 c.
Pattern 13, page 297:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 297:—
- Back of bodice, Plate VII, 17 c.
- Shaped cap, male, 17 and 18 c.
Pattern 14, page 298:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 298:—
- 2 collars, Charles II.
Pattern 15, page 299:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, page 299:—
- Jacket, Fig. C, Plate IV, 17 c.
Pattern 16, page 300:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 300:—
- 2 sleeve-cuffs, 18 c.
- 2 embroidered pockets, 17 and 18 c.
- Hanging sleeve, Fig. C, Plate II, 16-17 c.
- Embroidered bodice fronts, 17-18 c.
Pattern 17, page 301:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 301:—
- Quilted linen corsage, 1660-1715.
- Herald's coat, Fig. A, Plate VII, 16-17 c.
Pattern 18, page 302:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 302:—
- Sleeved waistcoat, 1690-1720.
Pattern 19, page 303:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 303:—
- Sleeved waistcoat and vest, early 18 c.
- Breeches, 1660-1720.
Pattern 21, page 305:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 305:—
- Breeches, 18 c.
Pattern 22, page 306:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 306:—
- Breeches, 18 c.
Pattern 23, page 307:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 307:—
- Coat, Fig. B, Plate XXVI, 19 c.
Pattern 24, page 308:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 308:—
- Coat, Fig. B, Plate XIII, 18 c.
- Corderoy trousers, from 1815.
Pattern 25, page 309:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 309:—
- Coat, late 18 c., Fig. A, Plate XV.
- Leather breeches, late 18-19 c.
- Straw hat, 1816-30.
Pattern 26, page 310:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 310:—
- Coat, 1784-94.
Pattern 27, page 311:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 311:—
- Coat, 1830-45.
Pattern 28, page 312:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 312:—
- Buff linen trousers, 1810-40.
Pattern 29, page 313:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, page 313:—
- Morning coat, Fig. A, Plate XXVI, 19 c.
Pattern 30, page 314:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 314:—
- Bodice, 1816-22.
Pattern 31, page 315:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 315:—
- Bell-sleeved bodice, 1848-58.
Pattern 32, page 316:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 316:—
- Bodice of linen dress, Fig. A, Plate XXII, about 1800.
Pattern 33, page 317:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, page 317:—
- Bodice, 1860-70.
- Bodice, 1850-60.
- Bodice, 1816-25.
Pattern 34, page 318:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 318:—
- Jacket bodice, Fig. A, Plate XXIV, about 1800.
- Bodice, similar type, Fig. A, Plate XXX, 1845-55.
Pattern 36, page 320:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 320:—
- Sleeveless over jacket, early 18 c.
- Spencer, 1827-37.
Pattern 37, page 321:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 321:—
- Bodice, 1812-18.
Pattern 38, page 322:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 322:—
- Corset pattern, 18 c.
- Bodice of Fig. A, Plate XIV, 18 c.
Pattern 39, page 323:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 323:—
- Bodice with type of pleated sack back, 1720-50.
Pattern 40, page 324:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 324:—
Pattern 41, page 325:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 325:—
- Zouave jacket, late 18 c.
- Bodice, 1818-28.
Pattern 42, page 326:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 326:—
- Silk jacket, Fig. B, Plate XIX, 18 c.
Pattern 43, page 327:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 327:—
- Bodice, Fig. C, Plate XVIII, 18 c.
Pattern 44, page 328:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 328:—
- Bodice, Fig. A, Plate XXX, 19 c.
Pattern 45, page 329:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 329:—
- Lady's coat, Fig. C, Plate XXXIII.
Pattern 46, Page 330:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, Page 330:—
- Polonaise dress, 1835-45.
Pattern 47, page 331:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 331:—
- Dress, 1805-18.
- Mob cap, 1780-1800.
- Cap with comb top, 1790-1800.
Pattern 48, page 332:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 332:—
- Quilted petticoat, 18 c.
Pattern 49, page 333:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 333:—
- Petticoat, Fig. B, Plate XVI, 18 c.
- Dress, Fig. B, Plate XVI.
Pattern 51, page 335:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 335:—
- Dress, Fig. C, Plate XVI.
Pattern 52, page 336:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 336:—
- White linen dress, 1795-1800.
Pattern 53, page 337:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 337:—
- Striped cotton dress, 1805-15.
Pattern 54, page 338:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 338:—
- Pattern of under robe, 1818-30.
Pattern 55, page 339:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 339:—
- Dress, Fig. C, Plate XXV.
Pattern 56, page 340:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 340:—
- Muslin dress, 1822-32.
Pattern 57, page 341:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 341:—
- Satin dress, 1837-47.
Pattern 58, page 342:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 342:—
- Dress, Fig. C, Plate XXIX.
Pattern 59, page 343:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 343:—
- Dress, Fig. B, Plate XXVIII.
Pattern 60, page 344:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 344:—
- Dress, Fig. C, Plate XXXII.
Pattern 61, page 345:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 345:—
- Lady's coat, 1856-70.
Pattern 62, page 346:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 346:—
- Silk dress, Fig. A, Plate XXXII, 1860-70.
Pattern 63, page 347:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 347:—
- Reefed polonaise, 1860-70.
Pattern 64, page 348:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 348:—
- Lady's jacket, Fig. C, Plate XIX, 18 c.
Pattern 65, page 349:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 349:—
- Cape, 1840-50.
Pattern 66, page 350:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 350:—
- Cape, 1860-75.
- Cape, 1830-40.
- Upper sleeve and collar, 16 c.
- Bodice with slashed sleeve, 1620-40.
- Boy's stays, coat, and vest, 1700-60.
Pattern 68, page 352:—
Pattern __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, p. 352:—
- Male robe, 1600-25.
- Puritan hat, 1640-60.
- Black velvet hat, 1600-20.
INDEX[359]
- Decorative Styles—
- Black-stitch work, 122, 129
- Braided, 110, 111, 132, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 182, 188, 200, 238, 244, 272
- Button, 110, 143, 144, 146, 182, 210
- Laced, 70, 88, 92, 110, 116
- Piped, 238, 244
- Pleated, 111, 140
- Pricked, 111, 140, 142, 152
- Punched, 111, 140, 142, 152
- Puffed, 88, 92, 110, 116, 118, 122, 129, 142, 146, 150, 180, 260
- Purfled, 145, 164, 190
- [360]Ribbon, 145, 172, 176, 178, 191, 253
- Serrated or shaped edging, 71, 96, 110, 146, 191, 214, 252
- Slashing, 92, 111, 112, 113, 116, 118, 122, 140, 142, 145, 152, 158, 164
- Straw-work, 111, 191
- Tassel, 238
- Tinsel, 237
- Tulle, 238
- Doublets, 132, 139
- Dress—
- Drill petticoat, 238
- Fans—
- Farthingale, 111, 136
- Foot-wear—
- Girdles—
- Gloves—
- Head-dress—
- Prehistoric,
- to 10 c.,
- 10 to 15 c.,
- 15 c.,
- 16 c.,
- 17 c.,
- 18 c.,
- Heraldic fashion, 66, 71, 109, 132
- Hoop skirts—
- Maccaroni fashion, 214
- Mantles, 262, 271
- Masks, 186
- Muffs, 160, 172, 180, 186, 189, 193, 201, 230, 253
- Panniers, 211, 222
- Parasols, 230, 234, 244, 272
- Patterns scaled, 276
- Pelisses, 244, 250, 262
- Plates (collotypes), frontispiece, 39, 42, 55, 58, 71, 74, 87, 90, 103, 106, 119,[362] 122, 135, 138, 151, 154, 167, 170, 183, 186, 199, 202, 215, 218, 231, 234, 247, 250, 259, 263, 266, 270, 279, 282
- Pockets, 192, 224
- Polonaise, 238, 262
- Purses, 236, 240, 246
- Sack-back (or Watteau) dress, 136, 185, 191, 196, 206, 211, 222
- Sashes, 168, 182, 279
- Sequins, 112
- Shawls, 272
- Spats, 273
- Spencers, 244, 250
- Sticks, 181, 188, 201, 211, 214, 226, 234
- Stockings, 138, 140, 154, 168, 182, 184, 189, 201, 210, 216, 234, 270
- Stomachers, 66, 112, 136, 142, 144, 146, 147, 154, 158, 172, 178, 184, 196, 207, 278
Printed by Spottiswoode, Ballantyne & Co. Ltd.
Colchester, London & Eton, England
Printed by Spottiswoode, Ballantyne & Co. Ltd.
Colchester, London & Eton, England
DRESSMAKING
Sewing
SIMPLE DRESSMAKING. By ETHEL R. HAMBRIDGE, Art Teachers' Certificate, etc. In foolscap 4to, cloth, 200 pp., with 750 plates and black-and-white diagrams. 7s. 6d. net.
SIMPLE DRESSMAKING. By ETHEL R. HAMBRIDGE, Art Teachers' Certificate, etc. In large format 4to, cloth, 200 pages, with 750 plates and black-and-white diagrams. 7s. 6d. net.
This book deals exhaustively with the various stitches and fastenings used in Dressmaking and their applications, Pressing, Making-up Processes, Taking Measurements, Cutting-out; and also contains some notes on Fitting.
This book thoroughly covers the different stitches and fastenings used in dressmaking and their applications, pressing, making-up processes, taking measurements, and cutting-out; and also includes some notes on fitting.
Simplicity and completeness have been the dual purpose of the Author, and her systematic treatment of the subject, aided by her remarkable gift of lucid explanation, and her unique practical experience, has produced a valuable contribution to the literature of Domestic Science.
Simplicity and completeness have been the dual purpose of the author, and her organized approach to the subject, along with her outstanding ability to explain things clearly and her unique hands-on experience, has resulted in a valuable addition to the literature on Domestic Science.
DRESS CUTTING AND MAKING. For the Classroom, Workroom, and Home. By EMILY WALLBANK, Head of the Needlework and Dressmaking Department, National Training School of Cookery, and MARIAN WALLBANK. In foolscap 4to, cloth, 271 pp., with 265 diagrams and illustrations. 6s. net.
DRESS CUTTING AND MAKING. For the Classroom, Workroom, and Home. By EMILY WALLBANK, Head of the Needlework and Dressmaking Department, National Training School of Cookery, and MARIAN WALLBANK. In foolscap 4to, cloth, 271 pages, with 265 diagrams and illustrations. 6shillings. net.
The object of this work will be realized in some degree if it helps the practical reader so to mobilize her knowledge of underlying causes that she is able to produce any desired effect in the cut and fashion of a garment.
The goal of this work will be achieved to some extent if it helps the practical reader effectively use her understanding of underlying causes to create any desired effect in the design and style of a garment.
SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LIMITED
1 Amen Corner, London, E.C. 4.
SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LIMITED
Amen Corner, London, E.C. 4.
EMBROIDERY
Embroidery
AN EMBROIDERY PATTERN BOOK. By MARY E. WARING. With a Foreword by Professor W. R. Lethaby, Royal College of Art. In cloth gilt, 170 pp., 2 coloured plates, with 84 full-page black-and-white diagrams. 8s. 6d. net.
AN EMBROIDERY PATTERN BOOK. By MARY E. WARING. With a Foreword by Professor W. R. Lethaby, Royal College of Art. In cloth with gold lettering, 170 pages, 2 colored plates, and 84 full-page black-and-white diagrams. 8s. 6d. net.
"Designing of this sort is no mystery that requires 'genius'; it is of the same kind as planting a garden border.... Most embroideresses, who will begin by adapting the elements given in this Pattern Book, and gain interest and confidence in so doing, will go forward insensibly to varying the elements themselves, and to taking flowers and animals direct from Nature. This ... is the work of a highly competent designer of embroidery, and I heartily recommend it."—W. R. Lethaby in the Foreword.
"Designing like this isn’t a mystery that needs 'genius'; it’s similar to planting a garden border... Most embroiderers, who will start by adapting the elements found in this Pattern Book and gain interest and confidence in doing so, will gradually begin to vary the elements themselves and take flowers and animals directly from Nature. This ... is the work of a highly skilled embroidery designer, and I wholeheartedly recommend it."—W. R. Lethaby in the Foreword.
EMBROIDERY & DESIGN. By JOAN H. DREW. In foolscap 4to, cloth, about 115 pp., with 82 black-and-white illustrations and designs. 5s. net.
EMBROIDERY & DESIGN. By JOAN H. DREW. In foolscap 4to, cloth, about 115 pp., with 82 black-and-white illustrations and designs. 5£. net.
The writer endeavours to arouse in her readers a desire for better designs, and greater individuality and thought in the home embroidery of to-day. The difference between decorative and undecorative work is clearly explained with the aid of many illustrations, and these are of the right size for tracing and working.
The author aims to inspire her readers to seek better designs and more individuality and creativity in today’s home embroidery. She clearly explains the difference between decorative and non-decorative work, supported by numerous illustrations that are appropriately sized for tracing and stitching.
SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LIMITED
SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LIMITED
ART
Art
THE ART OF PAINTING IN PASTEL. By J. LITTLEJOHNS, R.B.A., and L. RICHMOND, R.A. With a frontispiece and foreword by FRANK BRANGWYN, R.A. With 40 beautiful full-page coloured plates and 15 other illustrations. In demy 4to, cloth gilt. 15s. net.
THE ART OF PAINTING IN PASTEL. By J. LITTLEJOHNS, R.B.A., and L. RICHMOND, R.A. With a frontispiece and foreword by FRANK BRANGWYN, R.A. Featuring 40 stunning full-page color plates and 15 additional illustrations. In demy 4to, cloth gilt. 15s. net.
Extract from The Connoisseur:
Extract from *The Connoisseur*:
"The beautiful volume may quicken public interest in the method. The 40 plates in colour afford a fine series of examples of the resources of the medium and the best methods of exploiting them."
"The beautiful book may spark public interest in the method. The 40 color plates provide an excellent range of examples of the medium's capabilities and the best ways to utilize them."
DRAWING AND DESIGN. A School Course in Composition. By SAMUEL CLEGG, Headmaster of the County Secondary School, Long Eaton, Derbyshire, with a foreword by WILLIAM ROTHENSTEIN, Professor of Civic Art, Sheffield University. 10 in. by 7½ in. 12s. 6d. net.
DRAWING AND DESIGN. A School Course in Composition. By SAMUEL CLEGG, Headmaster of the County Secondary School, Long Eaton, Derbyshire, with a foreword by WILLIAM ROTHENSTEIN, Professor of Civic Art, Sheffield University. 10 in. by 7½ in. £12.6 net.
A feature of the book is the inclusion of plates printed by scholars from wood-blocks of their own making and designing. It also contains good sections on lettering and pen and ink drawing, as well as on pencil work, colour work, etc.
A key aspect of the book is the inclusion of plates printed by scholars from woodblocks they created and designed themselves. It also has solid sections on lettering, pen and ink drawing, and pencil and color work, among other things.
SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LIMITED
SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LIMITED
FROM THE ARTISTIC CRAFTS SERIES
FROM THE ARTISAN CRAFTS SERIES
HAND-LOOM WEAVING. By LUTHER HOOPER. 125 Drawings by the Author and NOEL ROOKE. Coloured and collotype reproduction. Small Crown 8vo, 368 pp. 8s. 6d. net.
HAND-LOOM WEAVING. By LUTHER HOOPER. 125 Drawings by the Author and NOEL ROOKE. Colored and collotype reproduction. Small Crown 8vo, 368 pp. 8s. 6d. net.
Extract from The Morning Post:
Extract from The Morning Post:
"... Every phase and process in weaving is described with so clear and careful an exactitude, that, helped as the text is by the Author's sketches and diagrams, the reader should have no difficulty in conquering with its aid the rudiments of the craft."
"... Every phase and process in weaving is described with such clear and careful precision that, with the help of the Author's sketches and diagrams, the reader should have no trouble mastering the basics of the craft."
EMBROIDERY & TAPESTRY WEAVING. By Mrs. A. H. CHRISTIE. Fourth Edition. 178 diagrams and illustrations by the Author, 16 pp. of collotype reproductions. Small Crown 8vo, 320 pp. 10s. 6d. net.
EMBROIDERY & TAPESTRY WEAVING. By Mrs. A. H. CHRISTIE. Fourth Edition. 178 diagrams and illustrations by the Author, 16 pages of collotype reproductions. Small Crown 8vo, 320 pages. £10.6 net.
Extract from The Pall Mall Gazette:
Extract from The Pall Mall Gazette:
"Mrs. Christie has performed her task to admiration, ... and her lucid explanations of various kinds of stitches ... should be of value to all workers at embroidery or tapestry weaving and to novices anxious to learn."
"Mrs. Christie has done an amazing job, ... and her clear explanations of different types of stitches ... will be helpful to anyone working with embroidery or tapestry weaving, as well as beginners eager to learn."
SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LIMITED
SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LIMITED
FROM THE ARTISTIC CRAFTS SERIES
FROM THE ARTISAN CRAFT SERIES
MANUSCRIPT WRITING & LETTERING. By An Educational Expert. Showing the historical development and practical application to modern handwriting of several manuscript styles derived from ancient Roman letters. Fully illustrated. Foolscap 4to. 6s. net.
MANUSCRIPT WRITING & LETTERING. By An Education Expert. This book explores the historical evolution and practical use of various manuscript styles based on ancient Roman letters, all presented with illustrations. Foolscap 4to. 6s. net.
Extract from The Times:
Extract from The Times:
"This book supplies and supplies generously a need which has become urgent.... For purposes purely practical, no teacher of plain handwriting need know more than this book tells him; nor should be content to know less."
"This book generously meets an urgent need. For practical purposes, no teacher of basic handwriting needs to know more than what this book provides; nor should they be satisfied with knowing less."
HERALDRY FOR CRAFTSMEN AND DESIGNERS. By W. H. ST. JOHN HOPE, Litt.D., D.C.L. Small Crown 8vo, 496 pp., 300 diagrams and designs, 24 collotype reproductions, and 8 coloured plates, 10s. 6d. net.
HERALDRY FOR CRAFTSMEN AND DESIGNERS. By W. H. ST. JOHN HOPE, Litt.D., D.C.L. Small Crown 8vo, 496 pages, 300 diagrams and designs, 24 collotype reproductions, and 8 color plates, £10.6 net.
Extract from The Athenæum:
Extract from The Athenæum:
"A series which includes three such books as Mr. Douglas Cockerell's 'Bookbinding,' Mr. Edward Johnston's 'Writing,' and this ranks almost as a national possession.... No artist can see this book without wanting to buy it, if it were only for the beauty of the objects selected for illustration."
"A series that includes three books like Mr. Douglas Cockerell's 'Bookbinding,' Mr. Edward Johnston's 'Writing,' and this is almost like a national treasure.... No artist can look at this book without feeling the urge to buy it, even if it's just for the beauty of the illustrations."
SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LIMITED
SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LIMITED
FROM THE ARTISTIC CRAFTS SERIES
FROM THE ART CRAFTS SERIES
WRITING AND ILLUMINATING & LETTERING. By EDWARD JOHNSTON. Tenth Edition. 227 illustrations and diagrams by the Author and NOEL ROOKE, 8 pp. of examples in red and black, 24 pp. of collotype reproductions, 512 pp. Small Crown 8vo. 8s. 6d. net.
WRITING AND ILLUMINATING & LETTERING. By EDWARD JOHNSTON. Tenth Edition. 227 illustrations and diagrams by the Author and NOEL ROOKE, 8 pages of examples in red and black, 24 pages of collotype reproductions, 512 pages. Small Crown 8vo. £0.42 net.
Extract from The Athenæum:
Extract from The Athenæum:
"... This book belongs to that extremely rare class in which every line bears the impress of complete mastery of the subject. We congratulate Mr. Johnston on having produced a work at once original and complete."
"... This book is part of that very rare category where every line shows total mastery of the subject. We congratulate Mr. Johnston on creating a work that is both original and comprehensive."
BOOKBINDING AND THE CARE OF BOOKS. By DOUGLAS COCKERELL. Fourth Edition. 122 drawings by NOEL ROOKE, 8 pages collotype reproductions. Small Crown 8vo, 352 pp. 7s. 6d. net.
BOOKBINDING AND THE CARE OF BOOKS. By DOUGLAS COCKERELL. Fourth Edition. 122 drawings by NOEL ROOKE, 8 pages of collotype reproductions. Small Crown 8vo, 352 pp. 7sh. 6d. net.
Extract from The Times:
Extract from The Times:
"... A capital proof of the reasoned thoroughness in workmanship, which is the first article in the creed of those who ... are attempting to carry into practice the industrial teaching of Ruskin and William Morris."
"... A prime example of the careful attention to detail in craftsmanship, which is the foundational principle for those who ... are trying to put into action the industrial teachings of Ruskin and William Morris."
SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LIMITED
SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LIMITED
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!