This is a modern-English version of Memoirs of Benjamin Franklin; Written by Himself. [Vol. 1 of 2]: With His Most Interesting Essays, Letters, and Miscellaneous Writings; Familiar, Moral, Political, Economical, and Philosophical, Selected with Care from All His Published Productions, and Comprising Whatever Is Most Entertaining and Valuable to the General Reader, originally written by Franklin, Benjamin. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.


Transcriber's Note

Transcriber's Note

Also, many occurrences of mismatched single and double quotes remain as they were in the original.

Also, many instances of mismatched single and double quotes still exist as they were in the original.

MEMOIRS

OF

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN;

WRITTEN BY HIMSELF.

WITH HIS
MOST INTERESTING ESSAYS, LETTERS, AND MISCELLANEOUS
WRITINGS; FAMILIAR, MORAL, POLITICAL,
ECONOMICAL, AND PHILOSOPHICAL.
SELECTED WITH CARE
FROM ALL HIS PUBLISHED PRODUCTIONS, AND COMPRISING
WHATEVER IS MOST ENTERTAINING AND VALUABLE
TO THE GENERAL READER.
IN TWO VOLUMES.

VOL. I.

NYC:
Harper & Brothers, Publishers,
FRANKLIN SQUARE.

Benjamin Franklin I am, Yours, B Franklin New-York, Harper & Brothers.

PUBLISHERS' ADVERTISEMENT.

It would be difficult, and perhaps impossible, to gather from the history and labours of any individual mind, a summary of practical wisdom as rich in varied instruction as the memoirs and writings presented in these volumes will be found to afford. If, on account of the most distinguished public services, the name of Franklin has become inseparably associated with his country's glory, the works which he has left behind him no less justly entitle him to be considered as the benefactor not only of his own country, but of mankind for all coming time. So admirable, indeed, are these productions, that they can only cease being read when the love of beauty and of simplicity, of moral power and of truth, has no longer a place in the hearts of men.

It would be challenging, and maybe impossible, to compile from the history and efforts of any single person a summary of practical wisdom as rich in diverse lessons as the memoirs and writings found in these volumes. Although Franklin's name has become inseparably linked with his country's glory due to his outstanding public service, the works he left behind also rightfully earn him a place as a benefactor not only for his own country but for humanity for all time. Indeed, these works are so remarkable that they will only stop being read when the appreciation for beauty, simplicity, moral strength, and truth has no longer a place in people's hearts.

"This self-taught American," to quote from the Edinburgh Review of 1806, "is the most rational, perhaps, of all philosophers. He never loses [Pg viii]sight of common sense in any of his speculations. No individual, perhaps, ever possessed a juster understanding, or was so seldom obstructed in the use of it by indolence, enthusiasm, or authority. * * * * There are not many among the thoroughbred scholars and philosophers of Europe who can lay claim to distinction in more than one or two departments of science and literature. The uneducated tradesman of America has left writings which call for our attention in natural philosophy, in politics, in political economy, and in general literature and morality." And again: "Nothing can be more perfectly and beautifully adapted to its object than most of the moral compositions of Dr. Franklin. The tone of familiarity, of good-will, and harmless jocularity; the plain and pointed illustrations; the short sentences, made up of short words; and the strong sense, clear information, and obvious conviction of the author himself, make most of his moral exhortations perfect models of popular eloquence, and often the finest specimens of a style which has been too little cultivated in his native country.

"This self-taught American," as noted in the Edinburgh Review of 1806, "is perhaps the most rational of all philosophers. He always keeps common sense in mind in all his ideas. No one, perhaps, ever had a better understanding or was so rarely held back by laziness, enthusiasm, or authority. There aren’t many among the esteemed scholars and philosophers of Europe who can claim distinction in more than one or two fields of science and literature. The uneducated tradesman from America has produced writings that deserve our attention in natural philosophy, politics, political economy, and general literature and morality." And again: "Nothing can be more perfectly and beautifully suited to its purpose than most of Dr. Franklin's moral writings. The tone of friendliness, goodwill, and harmless humor; the clear and direct examples; the short sentences made of simple words; and the strong sense, clear information, and evident conviction of the author himself make many of his moral teachings excellent models of popular eloquence, and often the finest examples of a style that has been too little appreciated in his home country."

"The most remarkable thing, however, in these, and indeed in the whole of his physical speculations, is the unparalleled simplicity and facility with which the reader is conducted from one stage of the inquiry to another. The author never appears for a moment to labour or [Pg ix]be at a loss. The most ingenious and profound explanations are suggested, as if they were the most natural and obvious way of accounting for the phenomena; and the author seems to value himself so little on his most important discoveries, that it is necessary to compare him with others before we can form a just notion of his merits."

"The most remarkable thing, though, in these, and really in all his physical explorations, is the incredible simplicity and ease with which the reader moves from one stage of the inquiry to the next. The author never seems to struggle or be unsure. The most clever and profound explanations come across as if they're the most natural and obvious ways to explain the phenomena; and the author doesn't seem to take much pride in his most significant discoveries, making it essential to compare him with others to truly appreciate his value."

While to every age these volumes cannot fail of being deeply interesting, to the young more especially they may be made of invaluable use. What an animating example do they present of the power of industry, and of frugality and temperance, of moral rectitude, and unremitting perseverance, to overcome every difficulty! And what youth, fired with the generous love of knowledge, and an ardent desire of honourable distinction, need ever despair of success after reading the memoirs of Benjamin Franklin; who, from the humble station of a printer's apprentice, without fortune or other extraneous aid, through a manly confidence in his own powers, elevated himself to the highest stations of honour and usefulness.

While these volumes are definitely interesting to every generation, they can be especially useful to young people. They provide an inspiring example of how hard work, saving money, self-control, moral integrity, and relentless perseverance can overcome any challenge. What young person, fueled by a genuine love of knowledge and a strong desire for honorable achievements, would ever lose hope for success after reading the memoirs of Benjamin Franklin? He rose from the humble position of a printer's apprentice, without wealth or outside assistance, and through a strong belief in his own abilities, he reached the highest levels of honor and usefulness.

It is from these and other considerations scarcely less interesting, that the publishers feel great confidence and pleasure in presenting this work to the public favour. Great care has been taken in selecting the matter of which these volumes are composed;[Pg x] and, it is believed, that they will be found to comprise nearly all that is most entertaining and useful to the general reader, in the writings of Franklin.

It is from these and other equally noteworthy considerations that the publishers are excited and confident in presenting this work to the public. Significant care has been taken in selecting the contents of these volumes;[Pg x] and it is believed they include nearly everything that is most engaging and useful to the average reader in Franklin's writings.

H. & B.

H. & B.

New-York, Sept., 1839.

New York, Sept. 1839.


CONTENTS

OF

THE FIRST VOLUME.


PART I.
 Page
Life of Dr. Franklin, written by himself13
 
PART II.
 
Letter from Mr. Abel James91
Letter from Mr. Benjamin Vaughan92
Continuation of Life, begun at Passy, near Paris, 178498
Memorandum115
 
PART III.
 
Life of Franklin, continued by Dr. Stuber191
Extracts from Franklin's Will227
 
WRITINGS OF FRANKLIN.
 
The Examination of Dr. Franklin before the British House of Commons, relative to the Repeal of the American Stamp-act237
Narrative of the Massacre of Friendly Indians in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, 1764264
Introduction to Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania282
Dr. Franklin's Motion for Prayers in the Convention at Philadelphia, 1787, to revise the then existing Articles of Confederation286

MEMOIRS OF FRANKLIN.

PART I.

To William Franklin, Esq., Governor of New-Jersey

To William Franklin, Esq., Governor of New Jersey

Twyford, at the Bishop of St. Asaph's,[1] 1771.

Twyford, at the Bishop of St. Asaph's,[1] 1771.

Dear Son,—I have ever had a pleasure in obtaining any little anecdotes of my ancestors. You may remember the inquiries I made among the remains of my relations when you were with me in England, and the journey I undertook for that purpose. Imagining it may be equally agreeable to you to learn the circumstances of my life, many of which you are unacquainted with, and expecting the enjoyment of a few weeks' uninterrupted leisure, I sit down to write them. Besides, there are some other inducements that excite me to this undertaking. From the poverty and obscurity in which I was born, and in which I passed my earliest years, I have raised myself to a state of affluence and some degree of celebrity in the world. As constant good fortune has accompanied me even to an advanced period of life, my posterity will perhaps be desirous of learning the means which I employed, and which, thanks to Providence, so well succeeded with me. They may also deem them fit to be imitated, should any of them find themselves in similar circumstances. This good fortune, when I reflect on it, which is frequently the case, has induced me sometimes to say, that if it were left to my choice, I should have no objection to go over the same life[Pg 14] from its beginning to the end: requesting only the advantage authors have, of correcting in a second edition the faults of the first. So would I also wish to change some incidents of it for others more favourable. Notwithstanding, if this condition was denied, I should still accept the offer of recommencing the same life. But as this repetition is not to be expected, that which resembles most living one's life over again, seems to be to recall all the circumstances of it; and, to render this remembrance more durable, to record them in writing. In thus employing myself I shall yield to the inclination so natural to old men, of talking of themselves and their own actions; and I shall indulge it without being tiresome to those who, from respect to my age, might conceive themselves obliged to listen to me, since they will be always free to read me or not. And lastly (I may as well confess it, as the denial of it would be believed by nobody), I shall perhaps not a little gratify my own vanity. Indeed, I never heard or saw the introductory words "Without vanity I may say," &c., but some vain thing immediately followed. Most people dislike vanity in others, whatever share they have of it themselves; but I give it fair quarter, wherever I meet with it, being persuaded that it is often productive of good to the possessor, and to others who are within his sphere of action: and therefore, in many cases, it would not be altogether absurd if a man were to thank God for his vanity among the other comforts of life.

Dear Son,,—I have always enjoyed learning little stories about my ancestors. You might remember the questions I asked my relatives when you were with me in England, and the trip I took for that purpose. Thinking it might be just as interesting for you to know about the events of my life, many of which you don’t know, and looking forward to a few weeks of uninterrupted free time, I’m sitting down to write them. Additionally, there are other reasons that drive me to do this. From the poverty and obscurity in which I was born and spent my early years, I have lifted myself to a level of wealth and some recognition in the world. Since I’ve been fortunate throughout my life, my descendants might want to know the methods I used that, thanks to Providence, worked out so well for me. They might also think it’s worth imitating if they ever find themselves in similar situations. When I think about this good fortune, which I often do, it has led me to say that if I had the choice, I wouldn’t mind going through the same life[Pg 14] from start to finish: only requesting the benefit that authors have of correcting their mistakes in a second edition. I would also like to change some incidents for ones that are more favorable. Nevertheless, if this opportunity were denied, I would still accept the chance to live the same life again. But since this repetition isn’t likely, what seems most like living one’s life over again is to recall all its details; and to make this memory last longer, to write them down. By doing this, I’ll give in to the natural inclination that old men have to talk about themselves and their own actions; and I’ll indulge in it without being a bother to those who, out of respect for my age, might feel obligated to listen to me, since they’re always free to read me or not. Lastly (I might as well admit it, as no one would believe me if I denied it), I’ll probably also satisfy my own vanity. In fact, I’ve never heard or seen the opening words "Without vanity I can say," &c., without some vain statement following. Most people dislike vanity in others, regardless of how much they have themselves; but I give it a fair chance whenever I encounter it, believing that it often brings benefits to the person possessing it and to others in their circle: so, in many cases, it wouldn’t be entirely absurd for someone to thank God for their vanity alongside other comforts of life.

And now I speak of thanking God, I desire with all humility to acknowledge that I attribute the mentioned happiness of my past life to his divine providence, which led me to the means I used and gave the success. My belief of this induces me to hope, though I must not presume, that the same goodness will still be exercised towards me, in continuing that happiness or enabling me to bear a fatal[Pg 15] reverse, which I may experience as others have done; the complexion of my future fortune being known to him only, in whose power it is to bless us, even in our afflictions.

And now that I’m talking about thanking God, I want to humbly acknowledge that I credit the happiness of my past life to His divine guidance, which led me to the means I used and granted me success. My belief in this encourages me to hope, though I shouldn’t presume, that the same goodness will continue towards me, either by maintaining that happiness or by helping me deal with a potential [Pg 15] setback, which I might face as others have; the nature of my future fortune is known only to Him, who has the power to bless us even in our troubles.

Some notes, one of my uncles (who had the same curiosity in collecting family anecdotes) once put into my hands, furnished me with several particulars relative to our ancestors. From these notes I learned that they lived in the same village, Ecton, in Northamptonshire, on a freehold of about thirty acres, for at least three hundred years, and how much longer could not be ascertained.[2]

Some notes that one of my uncles (who also shared a curiosity for collecting family stories) once gave me provided several details about our ancestors. From these notes, I found out that they lived in the same village, Ecton, in Northamptonshire, on a freehold of about thirty acres, for at least three hundred years, and how much longer is unknown.[2]

This small estate would not have sufficed for their[Pg 16] maintenance without the business of a smith, which had continued in the family down to my uncle's time, the eldest son being always brought up to that employment; a custom which he and my father followed with regard to their eldest sons. When I searched the registers at Ecton, I found an account of their marriages and burials from the year 1555 only, as the registers kept did not commence previous thereto. I however learned from it that I was the youngest son of the youngest son for five generations back. My grandfather Thomas, who was born 1598, lived at Ecton till he was too old to continue his business, when he retired to Banbury in Oxfordshire, to the house of his son John, with whom my father served an apprenticeship. There my uncle died and lies buried. We saw his gravestone in 1758. His eldest son Thomas lived in the house at Ecton, and left it with the land to his only daughter, who, with her husband, one Fisher, of Wellingborough, sold it to Mr. Isted, now lord of the manor there. My grandfather had four sons, who grew up: viz., Thomas, John, Benjamin, and Josiah. Being at a distance from my papers, I will give you what account I can of them from memory: and if my papers are not lost in my absence, you will find among them many more particulars.[3][Pg 17]

This small estate wouldn’t have been enough to support them without the family business of blacksmithing, which had been passed down until my uncle’s time, with the eldest son always trained to take over; this was a tradition my father and uncle continued for their oldest sons as well. When I looked through the records at Ecton, I found information about their marriages and burials starting from the year 1555, since the records didn’t exist before that. However, I did discover that I am the youngest son of the youngest son for five generations. My grandfather Thomas, born in 1598, lived in Ecton until he was too old to keep working, at which point he moved to Banbury in Oxfordshire to stay with his son John, where my father had served as an apprentice. That’s where my uncle passed away and is buried. We visited his gravestone in 1758. His eldest son Thomas stayed in the house at Ecton and left it, along with the land, to his only daughter, who sold it with her husband, one Fisher from Wellingborough, to Mr. Isted, the current lord of the manor there. My grandfather had four sons who survived: Thomas, John, Benjamin, and Josiah. Since I’m away from my papers, I’ll do my best to recount what I remember about them, and if my papers aren’t lost while I’m gone, you’ll find many more details among them.[3][Pg 17]

Thomas, my eldest uncle, was bred a smith under his father; but, being ingenious, and encouraged in learning (as all my brothers were) by an Esquire[Pg 18] Palmer, then the principal inhabitant of that parish, he qualified himself for the bar, and became a considerable man in the county; was chief mover of all public-spirited enterprises for the county or town of Northampton, as well as of his own village, of which many instances were related of him: and he was much taken notice of, and patronised by Lord Halifax. He died in 1702, the 6th of January; four years to a day before I was born. The recital which some elderly persons made to us of his character, I remember, struck you as something extraordinary, from its similarity with what you knew of me. "Had he died," said you, "four years later, on the same day, one might have supposed a transmigration." John, my next uncle, was bred a dyer, I believe of wool. Benjamin was bred a silk dyer, serving an apprenticeship in London. He was an ingenious man. I remember, when I was a boy, he came to my father's in Boston, and resided in the house with us for several years. There was always a particular affection between my father and him, and I was his godson. He lived to a great age. He left behind him two quarto volumes of manuscript, of his own poetry, consisting of fugitive pieces addressed to his friends. He had invented a shorthand of his own, which he taught me, but, not having practised it, I have now forgotten it. He was very pious, and an assiduous attendant at the sermons of the best preachers, which he reduced to writing according to his method, and had thus collected several volumes of them. He was also a good deal of a politician; too much so, perhaps, for his station. There fell lately into my hands in London, a collection he made of all the principal political pamphlets relating to public affairs, from the year 1641 to 1717; many of the volumes[Pg 19] are wanting, as appears by their numbering, but there still remain eight volumes in folio, and twenty in quarto and in octavo. A dealer in old books had met with them, and knowing me by name, having bought books of him, he brought them to me. It would appear that my uncle must have left them here when he went to America, which was about fifty years ago. I found several of his notes in the margins. His grandson, Samuel Franklin, is still living in Boston.

Thomas, my oldest uncle, was trained as a blacksmith by his father; however, being clever and encouraged in his studies (like all my brothers) by an Esquire[Pg 18] Palmer, who was the main resident of that parish, he prepared himself for the bar and became an important figure in the county. He was the main driver behind all public-spirited initiatives for the county or town of Northampton, as well as his own village, with many stories told about him. He drew a lot of attention and support from Lord Halifax. He passed away on January 6, 1702, exactly four years before I was born. I remember that the stories shared by some elderly people about his character struck you as extraordinary because of how similar it was to what you knew about me. "If he had died," you said, "four years later on the same day, one might think it was a reincarnation." My next uncle, John, became a dyer, I believe of wool. Benjamin was a silk dyer, serving an apprenticeship in London. He was a clever man. I remember that when I was a boy, he came to my father’s house in Boston and lived with us for several years. There was a special bond between my father and him, and I was his godson. He lived to a very old age and left behind two quarto volumes of his own poetry, which were collections of short pieces written for his friends. He had created his own shorthand system, which he taught me, but since I didn’t practice it, I've since forgotten it. He was very religious and frequently attended sermons by the best preachers, which he transcribed using his method, ultimately compiling several volumes of them. He was also quite politically engaged, perhaps too much so for his position. Recently, I came across a collection he compiled of all the major political pamphlets related to public affairs from 1641 to 1717 in London; many of the volumes[Pg 19] are missing, as shown by their numbering, but there are still eight folio volumes and twenty quarto and octavo volumes left. A rare book dealer found them and, knowing me by name because I had bought books from him, he brought them to me. It seems that my uncle must have left them here when he went to America about fifty years ago. I found several of his notes in the margins. His grandson, Samuel Franklin, is still living in Boston.

Our humble family early embraced the reformed religion. Our forefathers continued Protestants through the reign of Mary, when they were sometimes in danger of persecution on account of their zeal against popery. They had an English Bible, and to conceal it, and place it in safety, it was fastened open with tapes under and within the cover of a joint-stool. When my great-grandfather wished to read it to his family, he placed the joint-stool on his knees, and then turned over the leaves under the tapes. One of the children stood at the door to give notice if he saw the apparitor coming, who was an officer of the spiritual court. In that case the stool was turned down again upon its feet, when the Bible remained concealed under it as before. This anecdote I had from uncle Benjamin. The family continued all of the Church of England till about the end of Charles the Second's reign, when some of the ministers that had been outed for their nonconformity holding conventicles in Northamptonshire, my uncle Benjamin and father Josiah adhered to them, and so continued all their lives: the rest of the family remained with the Episcopal church.

Our humble family embraced the reformed religion early on. Our ancestors remained Protestants during Mary’s reign, when they sometimes faced persecution for their strong opposition to Catholicism. They owned an English Bible, and to hide it and keep it safe, they fastened it open with ribbons under and inside the cover of a joint stool. When my great-grandfather wanted to read it to his family, he would place the joint stool on his lap and then flip through the pages underneath the ribbons. One of the children stood by the door to alert them if they saw the apparitor, an officer from the spiritual court. In that case, the stool would be flipped back onto its feet, keeping the Bible hidden beneath it as before. I heard this story from Uncle Benjamin. The family stayed part of the Church of England until around the end of Charles the Second’s reign, when some ministers who had been ousted for their nonconformity held meetings in Northamptonshire. My Uncle Benjamin and father Josiah joined them and continued that way for the rest of their lives, while the rest of the family stayed with the Episcopal church.

My father married young, and carried his wife with three children to New-England, about 1682. The conventicles being at that time forbidden by law, and frequently disturbed in their meetings, some considerable men of his acquaintance determined to go to that country, and he was prevailed with to[Pg 20] accompany them thither, where they expected to enjoy the exercise of their religion with freedom. By the same wife my father had four children more born there, and by a second wife ten others, in all seventeen; of which I remember to have seen thirteen sitting together at his table, who all grew up to years of maturity, and were married; I was the youngest son, and the youngest of all except two daughters. I was born in Boston, in New-England. My mother, the second wife of my father, was Abiah Folger, daughter of Peter Folger, one of the first settlers of New-England, of whom honourable mention is made by Cotton Mather, in his ecclesiastical history of the country, entitled Magnalia Christi Americana, as "a goodly and learned Englishman," if I remember the words rightly. I was informed he wrote several small occasional works, but only one of them was printed, which I remember to have seen several years since. It was written in 1675. It was in familiar verse, according to the taste of the times and people, and addressed to the government there. It asserts the liberty of conscience, in behalf of the Anabaptists, the Quakers, and other sectarians that had been persecuted. He attributes to this persecution the Indian wars, and other calamities that had befallen the country; regarding them as so many judgments of God, to punish so heinous an offence, so contrary to charity. This piece appeared to me as written with manly freedom and a pleasing simplicity. The last six lines I remember, but have forgotten the preceding ones of the stanza; the purpose of them was, that his censures proceeded from good-will, and, therefore, he would be known to be the author.

My father married young and moved to New England with his wife and three kids around 1682. Since gatherings were illegal at that time and often disrupted, some influential friends of his decided to go to that country, and he was persuaded to [Pg 20] join them there, where they hoped to freely practice their religion. With the same wife, my father had four more children there, and with a second wife, he had ten others, totaling seventeen. I remember seeing thirteen of them together at his table; they all grew up, got married, and I was the youngest son, as well as the youngest of all except for two daughters. I was born in Boston, New England. My mother, my father's second wife, was Abiah Folger, the daughter of Peter Folger, one of the first settlers of New England, who is honored by Cotton Mather in his ecclesiastical history of the country called Magnalia Christi Americana, described as “a good and learned Englishman,” if I recall correctly. I heard he wrote several small occasional pieces, but only one was printed, which I remember seeing several years ago. It was written in 1675, in a casual verse style popular at the time, and addressed to the local government. It defends the freedom of conscience for the Anabaptists, Quakers, and other persecuted groups. He links this persecution to the Indian wars and other disasters that struck the region, viewing them as divine punishments for such a significant wrongdoing, which went against charity. This piece struck me as being written with boldness and a charming simplicity. I recall the last six lines, but I’ve forgotten the earlier parts of the stanza; the gist was that his criticisms came from goodwill, and therefore, he wanted to be known as the author.

"Because being a slanderer (he said)
I truly despise it;
From Sherburne__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ town, where I currently live,
I write my name here;[Pg 21]
Without causing any offense, your true friend,
It is Peter Folgier."

My elder brothers were all put apprentices to different trades. I was put to the grammar-school at eight years of age; my father intended to devote me, as the tithe of his sons, to the service of the church. My early readiness in learning to read (which must have been very early, and I do not remember when I could not read), and the opinion of all my friends, that I should certainly make a good scholar, encouraged him in this purpose of his. My uncle Benjamin, too, approved of it, and proposed to give me his shorthand volumes of sermons to set up with, if I would learn shorthand.

My older brothers were all put to work as apprentices in different trades. I started at grammar school when I was eight; my father wanted me to be dedicated, like a tithe of his sons, to serving in the church. My early ability to read (which must have been from a very young age, and I can't remember a time when I couldn't read) and everyone's belief that I would definitely become a good scholar encouraged him in this plan. My uncle Benjamin also supported it and offered to give me his shorthand sermon volumes to use if I agreed to learn shorthand.

I continued, however, at the grammar-school rather less than a year, though in that time I had risen gradually from the middle of the class of that year to be at the head of the same class, and was removed into the next class, whence I was to be placed in the third at the end of the year. But my father, burdened with a numerous family, was unable, without inconvenience, to support the expense of a college education; considering, moreover, as he said to one of his friends in my presence, the little encouragement that line of life afforded to those educated for it, he gave up his first intentions, took me from the grammar-school, and sent me to a school for writing and arithmetic, kept by a then famous man, Mr. George Brownwell. He was a skilful master, and successful in his profession, employing the mildest and most encouraging methods. Under him I learned to write a good hand pretty soon, but failed entirely in arithmetic. At ten years old I was taken to help my father in his business of a tallow-chandler and soap-boiler, a business to which he was not bred, but had assumed on his arrival in New-England, because he found that his dying trade, being in little request, would not maintain his family. Accordingly, I was employed in[Pg 22] cutting the wick for the candles, filling the moulds for cast candles, attending the shop, going of errands, &c.

I stayed at the grammar school for just under a year, but during that time, I moved up from the middle of my class to the top and was promoted to the next class, where I was set to move up to the third class at the end of the year. However, my father, who had a large family to support, couldn’t afford the expenses of a college education without significant sacrifice. He also told one of his friends in my hearing that he saw little reward in that path for those trained for it. So, he changed his mind, pulled me from the grammar school, and enrolled me in a writing and arithmetic school run by a well-known instructor, Mr. George Brownwell. He was a skilled teacher and successful in his field, using gentle and encouraging methods. I quickly learned to write well under him, but I completely struggled with arithmetic. At ten years old, I was taken to help my father with his business as a tallow chandler and soap boiler, a trade he wasn’t originally trained in but had taken up when he arrived in New England, as his previous trade was no longer viable to support the family. So, I was busy with[Pg 22] tasks like cutting wicks for candles, filling molds for cast candles, running the shop, running errands, etc.

I disliked the trade, and had a strong inclination to go to sea, but my father declared against it; but, residing near the water, I was much in it and on it. I learned to swim well, and to manage boats; and when embarked with other boys, I was commonly allowed to govern, especially in any case of difficulty; and upon other occasions I was generally the leader among the boys, and sometimes led them into scrapes, of which I will mention an instance, as it shows an early projecting public spirit, though not then justly conducted.

I didn't like the trade and really wanted to go to sea, but my father was against it. However, living close to the water, I spent a lot of time in it and on it. I learned to swim well and handle boats; when I was out with other boys, I was usually allowed to take charge, especially when challenges came up. Most of the time, I was the leader among the boys, and I sometimes got us into trouble. I'll share one example, as it highlights an early sense of public spirit, even if it wasn't executed well at the time.

There was a salt-marsh which bounded part of the millpond, on the edge of which, at high water, we used to stand to fish for minnows; by much trampling, we had made it a mere quagmire. My proposal was to build a wharf there for us to stand upon, and I showed my comrades a large heap of stones, which were intended for a new house near the marsh, and which would very well suit our purpose. Accordingly, in the evening, when the workmen were gone home, I assembled a number of my playfellows, and we worked diligently like so many emmets, sometimes two or three to a stone, till we had brought them all to make our little wharf. The next morning the workmen were surprised on missing the stones which formed our wharf; inquiry was made after the authors of this transfer; we were discovered, complained of, and corrected by our fathers; and though I demonstrated the utility of our work, mine convinced me that that which was not truly honest could not be truly useful.

There was a salt marsh that bordered part of the millpond, where we used to stand to fish for minnows at high tide; we had made it a total quagmire from all the stomping around. I suggested building a wharf there for us to stand on, and I pointed out a big pile of stones meant for a new house near the marsh, which would be perfect for our project. So, in the evening, after the workers had gone home, I gathered some of my friends, and we worked hard like little ants, sometimes two or three of us carrying a stone, until we had moved them all to create our little wharf. The next morning, the workers were surprised to find the stones missing from where we had built our wharf; they started asking who was responsible for the move. We were found out, complained about, and corrected by our fathers; and even though I showed the usefulness of our work, mine made it clear that what is not truly honest cannot be truly useful.

I suppose you may like to know what kind of a man my father was. He had an excellent constitution, was of a middle stature, well set, and very strong: he could draw prettily, was a little skilled in music; his voice was sonorous and agreeable, so[Pg 23] that when he played on his violin and sung withal, as he was accustomed to do after the business of the day was over, it was extremely agreeable to hear. He had some knowledge of mechanics, and, on occasion, was very handy with other tradesmen's tools; but his great excellence was his sound understanding and solid judgment in prudential matters, both in private and public affairs. It is true, he was never employed in the latter, the numerous family he had to educate and the strictness of his circumstances keeping him close to his trade: but I remember well his being frequently visited by leading men, who consulted him for his opinion in public affairs, and those of the church he belonged to, and who showed great respect for his judgment and advice: he was also much consulted by private persons about their affairs when any difficulty occurred, and frequently chosen an arbitrator between contending parties. At his table he liked to have, as often as he could, some sensible friend or neighbour to converse with, and always took care to start some ingenious or useful topic for discourse, which might tend to improve the minds of his children. By this means he turned our attention to what was good, just, and prudent in the conduct of life; and little or no notice was ever taken of what related to the victuals on the table, whether it was well or ill dressed, in or out of season, of good or bad flavour, preferable or inferior to this or that other thing of the kind, so that I was brought up in such a perfect inattention to those matters as to be quite indifferent as to what kind of food was set before me. Indeed, I am so unobservant of it, that to this day I can scarce tell a few hours after dinner of what dishes it consisted. This has been a great convenience to me in travelling, where my companions have been sometimes very unhappy for want of a suitable gratification of their more delicate, because better instructed, tastes and appetites.[Pg 24]

I guess you might want to know what

My mother had likewise an excellent constitution: she suckled all her ten children. I never knew either my father or mother to have any sickness but that of which they died, he at 89, and she at 85 years of age. They lie buried together at Boston, where I some years since placed a marble over their grave with this inscription:

My mom also had a great constitution: she nursed all ten of her kids. I never saw either my dad or mom get sick except for the illness that ultimately took their lives; he passed away at 89, and she at 85. They are buried together in Boston, where I placed a marble headstone over their grave a few years ago with this inscription:

Josiah Franklin,
and
Abiah, his wife,
lie here interred.
They lived lovingly together in wedlock
fifty-five years.
And without an estate, or any gainful employment,
By constant labour and honest industry,
maintained a large family comfortably,
and brought up thirteen children and seven grandchildren
respectably.
From this instance, reader,
Be encouraged to diligence in thy calling,
And distrust not Providence.
He was a pious and prudent man;
She a discreet and virtuous woman.
Their youngest son,
In filial regard to their memory,
Places this stone.
J. F. born 1655, died 1744, Ætas 89.
A. F. —— 1667, —— 1752, —— 85.

Josiah Franklin,
and
Abiah, his wife,
are buried here.
They lived happily together in marriage
for fifty-five years.
Without any wealth or steady job,
Through hard work and honest effort,
they supported a large family comfortably,
raising thirteen children and seven grandchildren
with respect.
From this example, dear reader,
be motivated to work hard in your endeavors,
and don’t lose faith in Providence.
He was a devout and wise man;
She was a careful and virtuous woman.
Their youngest son,
out of love for their memory,
placed this stone.
J. F. born 1655, died 1744, Ætas 89.
A. F. —— 1667, —— 1752, —— 85.

By my rambling digressions, I perceive myself to be grown old. I used to write more methodically. But one does not dress for private company as for a public ball. Perhaps it is only negligence.

By my wandering thoughts, I realize I’ve grown old. I used to write more systematically. But you don't dress for a quiet gathering the same way you would for a big event. Maybe it’s just carelessness.

To return: I continued thus employed in my father's business for two years, that is, till I was twelve years old; and my brother John, who was bred to that business, having left my father, married and set up for himself at Rhode Island, there was every appearance that I was destined to supply his place, and become a tallow-chandler. But my dislike to the trade continuing, my father had apprehensions that if he did not put me to one more agreeable, I should break loose and go to sea, as my brother[Pg 25] Josiah had done to his great vexation. In consequence, he took me to walk with him, and see joiners, bricklayers, turners, braziers, &c., at their work, that he might observe my inclination, and endeavour to fix it on some trade or profession that would keep me on land. It has ever since been a pleasure to me to see good workmen handle their tools; and it has been often useful to me to have learned so much by it as to be able to do some trifling jobs in the house when a workman was not at hand, and to construct little machines for my experiments, at the moment when the intention of making them was warm in my mind. My father determined at last for the cutlers' trade, and placed me for some days on trial with Samuel, son to my uncle Benjamin, who was bred to that trade in London, and had just established himself in Boston. But the sum he exacted as a fee for my apprenticeship displeased my father, and I was taken home again. From my infancy I was passionately fond of reading, and all the money that came into my hands was laid out in the purchasing of books. I was very fond of voyages. My first acquisition was Bunyan's works in separate little volumes. I afterward sold them to enable me to buy R. Burton's Historical Collections; they were small chapmen's books, and cheap, 40 volumes in all. My father's little library consisted chiefly of books in polemic divinity, most of which I read. I have often regretted that, at a time when I had such a thirst for knowledge, more proper books had not fallen into my way, since it was resolved I should not be bred to divinity; there was among them Plutarch's Lives, which I read abundantly, and I still think that time spent to great advantage. There was also a book of De Foe's, called an Essay on Projects, and another of Dr. Mather's, called an Essay to do good, which perhaps gave me a turn of thinking that had an influence[Pg 26] on some of the principal future events of my life.

To go back: I worked in my father’s business for two years, until I turned twelve; my brother John, who was supposed to take over that business, left my dad, got married, and started his own thing in Rhode Island. It seemed like I was meant to take his place and become a tallow-chandler. However, since I still didn’t like the trade, my father worried that if he didn’t find me something I liked better, I would run away and go to sea, just like my brother Josiah had done, which really upset him. Because of this, he took me to see joiners, bricklayers, turners, braziers, and others at their work, trying to find out what I liked and hoping to guide me toward a trade or profession that would keep me on land. I've always enjoyed watching skilled workers use their tools; it's also been useful to learn enough to handle some minor tasks around the house when no one was available, and to build little machines for my projects as soon as I got the idea. Eventually, my father decided on the cutlery trade and arranged for me to spend a few days apprenticing with Samuel, my uncle Benjamin’s son, who had trained in that trade in London and had just set up shop in Boston. However, my dad was unhappy with the fee Samuel wanted for my apprenticeship, so I was sent back home. Since I was a child, I loved reading, and I spent all the money I got on buying books. I was especially interested in adventure stories. My first purchase was Bunyan's works in separate little volumes. I eventually sold those to buy R. Burton's Historical Collections, which were small, inexpensive chapbooks—a total of 40 volumes. My father's small library mainly included books on controversial religious topics, and I read most of them. I often wished that during my intense desire for knowledge, more suitable books had come my way, especially since I wasn't meant to go into the clergy. Among those books was Plutarch's Lives, which I read a lot, and I still think that was time well spent. There was also a book by Defoe called An Essay on Projects, and another by Dr. Mather titled An Essay to Do Good, which probably shaped my thinking and influenced some major events in my future.

This bookish inclination at length determined my father to make me a printer, though he had already one son (James) of that profession. In 1717 my brother James returned from England with a press and letters to set up his business in Boston. I liked it much better than that of my father, but still had a hankering for the sea. To prevent the apprehended effect of such an inclination, my father was impatient to have me bound to my brother. I stood out some time, but at last was persuaded, and signed the indentures when I was yet but twelve years old. I was to serve as an apprentice till I was twenty-one years of age, only I was to be allowed journeyman's wages during the last year. In a little time I made a great progress in the business, and became a useful hand to my brother. I had now access to better books. An acquaintance with the apprentices of booksellers enabled me sometimes to borrow a small one, which I was careful to return soon and clean. Often I sat up in my chamber the greatest part of the night, when the book was borrowed in the evening to be returned in the morning, lest it should be found missing. After some time a merchant, an ingenious, sensible man, Mr. Matthew Adams, who had a pretty collection of books, frequented our printing-office, took notice of me, and invited me to see his library, and very kindly proposed to lend me such books as I chose to read. I now took a strong inclination for poetry, and wrote some little pieces; my brother, supposing it might turn to account, encouraged me, and induced me to compose two occasional ballads. One was called the Lighthouse Tragedy, and contained an account of the shipwreck of Captain Worthilake, with his two daughters: the other was a sailor's song, on the taking of the famous Teach (or Blackbeard) the pirate. They were wretched stuff, in street-ballad[Pg 27] style; and when they were printed, my brother sent me about the town to sell them. The first sold prodigiously, the event being recent, and having made a great noise. This success flattered my vanity; but my father discouraged me, by criticising my performances, and telling me verse-makers were generally beggars. Thus I escaped being a poet, and probably a very bad one: but as prose writing has been of great use to me in the course of my life, and was a principal means of my advancement, I shall tell you how, in such a situation, I acquired what little ability I may be supposed to have in that way.

This love for books eventually led my father to make me a printer, even though he already had one son (James) in that profession. In 1717, my brother James came back from England with a printing press and type to start his business in Boston. I liked it way more than my father's work, but I still had a desire for the sea. To curb my interest in the ocean, my father was eager to have me apprentice with my brother. I resisted for a while, but eventually gave in and signed the apprenticeship agreement when I was just twelve years old. I was to work as an apprentice until I turned twenty-one, but I would earn journeyman's wages during the last year. Before long, I made significant progress in the trade and became a valuable asset to my brother. I now had access to better books. Getting to know the apprentices at the bookstores allowed me to occasionally borrow a small one, which I was careful to return quickly and in good condition. Often, I stayed up in my room most of the night, especially when I borrowed a book in the evening to return it the next morning, so it wouldn't be missed. After a while, a merchant named Mr. Matthew Adams, who was clever and well-informed and had a nice collection of books, visited our printing office, noticed me, and invited me to check out his library. He kindly offered to lend me any books I wanted to read. I started developing a strong interest in poetry and wrote a few small pieces; my brother thought it might be beneficial, so he encouraged me and got me to write two occasional ballads. One was titled the Lighthouse Tragedy, which told the story of the shipwreck of Captain Worthilake and his two daughters. The other was a sailor's song about the capture of the famous pirate Teach (or Blackbeard). They were pretty terrible, written in the style of street ballads; when they were printed, my brother sent me out around town to sell them. The first one sold incredibly well since the event was recent and had made quite a stir. This success fed my ego, but my father discouraged me by criticizing my work and telling me that poets usually end up as beggars. So I avoided becoming a poet, and probably a pretty bad one at that. However, since writing prose has been extremely valuable to me throughout my life and was a key factor in my success, I'll share how I developed the little ability I have in that area.

There was another bookish lad in the town, John Collins by name, with whom I was intimately acquainted. We sometimes disputed, and very fond we were of argument, and very desirous of confuting one another, which disputatious turn, by-the-way, is apt to become a very bad habit, making people often extremely disagreeable in company, by the contradiction that is necessary to bring it into practice; and thence, besides souring and spoiling the conversation, it is productive of disgusts and, perhaps, enmities with those who may have occasion for friendship. I had caught this by reading my father's books of disputes on religion. Persons of good sense, I have since observed, seldom fall into it, except lawyers, university men, and, generally, men of all sorts who have been bred at Edinburgh. A question was once some how or other started, between Collins and me, on the propriety of educating the female sex in learning, and their abilities for study. He was of opinion that it was improper, and that they were naturally unequal to it. I took the contrary side, perhaps for dispute' sake. He was naturally more eloquent, having a greater plenty of words; and sometimes, as I thought, I was vanquished more by his fluency than by the strength of his reasons. As we parted without settling the[Pg 28] point, and were not to see one another again for some time, I sat down to put my arguments in writing, which I copied fair and sent to him. He answered, and I replied. Three or four letters on a side had passed, when my father happened to find my papers and read them. Without entering into the subject in dispute, he took occasion to talk to me about my manner of writing; observed that, though I had the advantage of my antagonist in correct spelling and pointing (which he attributed to the printing-house), I fell far short in elegance of expression, in method, and perspicuity, of which he convinced me by several instances. I saw the justice of his remarks, and thence grew more attentive to my manner of writing, and determined to endeavour to improve my style.

There was another bookish guy in town named John Collins, and I knew him really well. We would sometimes get into debates, enjoying arguments and eager to prove each other wrong, which, by the way, can turn into a bad habit. It often makes people really unpleasant to be around because it requires contradiction, which spoils conversations and can lead to annoyance and even conflicts with those who might otherwise be friends. I picked this up from reading my dad's books on religious debates. I’ve noticed that sensible people rarely engage in this, except for lawyers, university students, and generally anyone who’s been educated in Edinburgh. One time, Collins and I got into a discussion about whether it was appropriate to educate women and if they had the ability to study. He believed it was improper and that women were inherently not suited for it. I took the opposite stance, probably just for the sake of argument. He was naturally more eloquent, having a lot more words at his disposal, and sometimes I felt like I lost more to his fluency than to the strength of his points. Since we parted without resolving the issue, and wouldn’t see each other for a while, I decided to write down my arguments, polished them up, and sent them to him. He replied, and I wrote back. After exchanging three or four letters, my dad found my papers and read them. Without getting into the substance of our debate, he took the opportunity to talk to me about my writing style; he pointed out that although I had better spelling and punctuation than my opponent (thanks to the printing press), I lacked elegance, organization, and clarity, which he showed me with several examples. I recognized the validity of his comments and became more aware of my writing style, resolving to improve it.

About this time I met with an odd volume of the Spectator. I had never before seen any of them. I bought it, read it over and over, and was much delighted with it. I thought the writing excellent, and wished, if possible, to imitate it. With that view I took some of the papers, and, making short hints of the sentiments in each sentence, laid them by a few days, and then, without looking at the book, tried to complete the papers again, by expressing each hinted sentiment at length and as fully as it had been expressed before in any suitable words that should occur to me. Then I compared my Spectator with an original, discovered some of my faults, and corrected them. But I found I wanted a stock of words, or a readiness in recollecting and using them, which I thought I should have acquired before that time if I had gone on making verses; since the continual search for words of the same import, but of different lengths, to suit the measure, or of different sounds for the rhyme, would have laid me under a constant necessity of searching for variety, and also have tended to fix that variety in my mind, and make me master of it. Therefore I[Pg 29] took some of the tales in the Spectator, and turned them into verse: and after a time, when I had pretty well forgotten the prose, turned them back again. I also sometimes jumbled my collection of hints into confusion, and after some weeks endeavoured to reduce them into the best order, before I began to form the full sentences and complete the subject. This was to teach me method in the arrangement of the thoughts. By comparing my work with the original, I discovered many faults and corrected them; but I sometimes had the pleasure to fancy that, in particulars of small consequence, I had been fortunate enough to improve the method or the language, and this encouraged me to think that I might in time come to be a tolerable English writer, of which I was extremely ambitious. The time I allotted for writing exercises and for reading was at night, or before work began in the morning, or on Sunday, when I contrived to be in the printing-house, avoiding as much as I could the constant attendance at public worship which my father used to exact from me when I was under his care, and which I still continued to consider as a duty, though I could not afford time to practise it.

Around this time, I came across a random issue of the Spectator. I had never seen any of them before. I bought it, read it over and over, and really enjoyed it. I thought the writing was excellent and wished to imitate it if possible. With that goal in mind, I took some of the articles, made brief notes on the ideas in each sentence, set them aside for a few days, and then, without looking at the book, tried to rewrite the articles by expressing each noted idea in full using whatever suitable words came to me. Then I compared my version of the Spectator with the original, found some of my mistakes, and corrected them. However, I realized I needed a better vocabulary or a quicker way to remember and use words, which I thought I would have developed if I had continued writing poetry; since constantly searching for synonyms with different lengths to fit the meter or varying sounds for the rhyme would have forced me to look for variety and helped me retain it better. So, I took some of the stories in the Spectator and turned them into verse. After a while, when I had mostly forgotten the prose, I changed them back. Sometimes, I would mix up my collection of notes and, after a few weeks, tried to arrange them in the best order before starting to form full sentences and complete the topic. This was to help me learn to organize my thoughts. By comparing my work with the original, I found many mistakes and fixed them; but I also sometimes enjoyed thinking that, in some less important aspects, I had managed to improve the method or language, which encouraged me to believe that I might eventually become a decent English writer, something I was very eager to achieve. The time I set aside for writing practice and reading was at night, or before starting work in the morning, or on Sundays when I tried to be in the printing house, avoiding as much as I could the regular attendance at public worship that my father insisted on when I was under his care. I still regarded it as a duty, even though I couldn’t find the time to practice it.

When about sixteen years of age I happened to meet with another book, written by one Tryon, recommending a vegetable diet. I determined to go into it. My brother, being yet unmarried, did not keep house, but boarded himself and his apprentices in another family. My refusing to eat flesh occasioned an inconvenience, and I was frequently chid for my singularity. I made myself acquainted with Tryon's manner of preparing some of his dishes, such as boiling potatoes or rice, making hasty pudding, and a few others, and then proposed to my brother if he would give me, weekly, half the money he paid for my board, I would board myself. He instantly agreed to it, and I presently found that I could save half what he paid me.[Pg 30]

When I was about sixteen, I stumbled upon another book written by someone named Tryon, promoting a vegetarian diet. I decided to give it a try. My brother, who was still single, didn’t run a household and instead boarded with another family along with his apprentices. My decision to stop eating meat caused some issues, and I was often criticized for being different. I learned how to prepare some of Tryon’s dishes, like boiling potatoes or rice, making hasty pudding, and a few others. I then suggested to my brother that if he would give me half of what he paid for my meals each week, I would take care of my own food. He agreed right away, and I quickly discovered that I could save half of what he gave me.[Pg 30]

This was an additional fund for buying of books. But I had another advantage in it. My brother and the rest going from the printing-office to their meals, I remained there alone; and despatching presently my light repast, which was often no more than a biscuit, or a slice of bread and a handful of raisins, a tart from the pastry-cook's, and a glass of water, I had the rest of the time till their return for study, in which I made the greater progress, from that clearness of head and quick apprehension which generally attends temperance in eating and drinking.

This was an extra fund for buying books. But I had another benefit from it. While my brother and the others went from the printing office to their meals, I stayed there alone. After quickly finishing my light meal, which was often just a biscuit, a slice of bread, and a handful of raisins, a tart from the pastry shop, and a glass of water, I had the rest of the time until they got back to study. I made significant progress during this time, thanks to the clear mind and quick understanding that usually come with eating and drinking in moderation.

Now it was that, being on some occasion made ashamed of my ignorance in figures, which I had twice failed learning when at school, I took Cocker's book on arithmetic, and went through the whole by myself with the greatest ease. I also read Sellers and Sturny's book on navigation, which made me acquainted with the little geometry it contained; but I never proceeded far in that science. I read about this time Locke on the Human Understanding, and the Art of Thinking, by Messrs. du Port Royal.

Now it was that, feeling embarrassed about my lack of knowledge in math, which I had tried and failed to learn twice in school, I picked up Cocker's arithmetic book and easily went through it all by myself. I also read Sellers and Sturny's navigation book, which introduced me to the little bit of geometry it included; however, I never delved deeply into that subject. Around this time, I read Locke on the Human Understanding and The Art of Thinking by the authors from du Port Royal.

While I was intent on improving my language, I met with an English grammar (I think it was Greenwood's) having at the end of it two little sketches on the arts of rhetoric and logic, the latter finishing with a dispute in the Socratic method; and soon after I procured Xenophon's Memorable Things of Socrates, wherein there are many examples of the same method. I was charmed by it, adopted it, dropped my abrupt contradiction and positive argumentation, and put on the humble inquirer; and being then, from reading Shaftesbury and Collins, made a doubter, as I already was in many points of our religious doctrines, I found this method the safest for myself and very embarrassing to those against whom I used it; therefore I took delight in it, practised it continually, and grew very artful and expert in drawing people, even of superior knowledge,[Pg 31] into concessions, the consequences of which they did not foresee; entangling them in difficulties, out of which they could not extricate themselves, and so obtaining victories that neither myself nor my cause always deserved. I continued this method some few years, but gradually left it, retaining only the habit of expressing myself in terms of modest diffidence; never using, when I advanced anything that might possibly be disputed, the word certainly, undoubtedly, or any other that gave the air of positiveness to an opinion; but rather said, I conceive or apprehend a thing to be so and so; it appears to me, or I should not think it is so, for such and such reasons; or I imagine it to be so; or it is so, if I am not mistaken. This habit, I believe, has been of great advantage to me when I have had occasion to inculcate my opinions, and persuade men into measures that I have been from time to time engaged in promoting; and, as the chief ends of conversation are to inform or to be informed, to please or to persuade, I wish well-meaning and sensible men would not lessen their power of doing good by a positive, assuming manner, that seldom fails to disgust, tends to create opposition, and to defeat most of those purposes for which speech was given to us.

While I was focused on improving my language skills, I came across an English grammar book (I think it was Greenwood's) that included two short sections on rhetoric and logic at the end, with the latter featuring a discussion using the Socratic method. Soon after, I got a hold of Xenophon's Memorable Things of Socrates, which has many examples of the same method. I was captivated by it, adopted it, stopped my abrupt contradictions and assertive arguments, and took on the role of a humble inquirer. Having read Shaftesbury and Collins, which made me a doubter, especially regarding many of our religious doctrines, I found this method to be the safest for myself and quite challenging for those I used it against. I enjoyed it, practiced it constantly, and became quite skillful in coaxing even those with superior knowledge[Pg 31] into concessions they didn't foresee, getting them tangled in issues they couldn't resolve, thus achieving victories that I or my cause often didn't truly deserve. I continued using this method for a few years but gradually abandoned it, keeping only the habit of expressing myself with modest uncertainty. I avoided words like certainly, undoubtedly, or anything that suggested strong certainty in an opinion. Instead, I would say I conceive or apprehend something to be this or that; it appears to me, or I would think it is so for these reasons; or I imagine it to be so; or it is so, if I'm not mistaken. I believe this habit has greatly benefited me when I've needed to share my opinions and persuade others to support the initiatives I've been promoting. Since the main purposes of conversation are to inform or be informed, to please or to persuade, I wish that well-meaning and sensible individuals wouldn't diminish their ability to do good by adopting a positive, assertive attitude that often alienates others, creates opposition, and undermines the very reasons we have speech.

In fact, if you wish to instruct others, a positive and dogmatical manner in advancing your sentiments may occasion opposition and prevent a candid attention. If you desire improvement from others, you should not, at the same time, express yourself fixed in your present opinions; modest and sensible men, who do not love disputations, will leave you undisturbed in the possession of your errors. In adopting such a manner, you can seldom expect to please your hearers, or obtain the concurrence you desire. Pope judiciously observes,

In fact, if you want to teach others, being overly confident and rigid in your beliefs can lead to pushback and stop people from really listening. If you want to improve through the ideas of others, you shouldn't come off as stubborn about your current opinions. Thoughtful and reasonable people, who aren't into arguments, will just let you hold onto your mistakes. By taking this approach, you can rarely expect to win over your audience or get the agreement you want. Pope wisely notes,

"People should be taught as though they haven't been taught,
And unfamiliar things should be presented as if they were forgotten."

He also recommends it to us,

He also suggests it to us,

"To speak, though sure, with seeming diffidence."

"To speak confidently while maintaining a sense of humility."

And he might have joined with this line that which he has coupled with another, I think, less properly.

And he could have connected this line with what he has linked to another line, which I believe is a less suitable connection.

"For want of modesty is want of sense."

"Without modesty, there's a lack of common sense."

If you ask why less properly, I must repeat the lines,

If you ask why differently, I have to repeat those lines,

"Arrogant words offer no defense,
Because a lack of modesty shows a lack of sense."

Now is not the want of sense (where a man is so unfortunate as to want it) some apology for his want of modesty? and would not the lines stand more justly thus?

Now, isn't the lack of common sense (when someone is unfortunately missing it) some excuse for their lack of modesty? And wouldn't the lines make more sense like this?

"Shameless words only allow this excuse,
That lack of modesty signals a lack of sense."

This, however, I should submit to better judgments.

This, however, I should leave to better judgments.

My brother had, in 1720 or 21, began to print a newspaper. It was the second that appeared in America, and was called the New-England Courant. The only one before it was the Boston News-Letter. I remember his being dissuaded by some of his friends from the undertaking, as not likely to succeed, one newspaper being, in their judgment, enough for America. At this time (1771) there are not less than five-and-twenty.[5] He went on, however, with the undertaking; I was employed to carry the papers to the customers, after having worked in composing the types and printing off the sheets. He had some ingenious men among his friends, who amused themselves by writing little pieces for his paper, which gained it credit and made it more in demand, and these gentlemen often visited us.

My brother started printing a newspaper around 1720 or 21. It was the second one published in America and was called the New-England Courant. The first was the Boston News-Letter. I remember some of his friends trying to talk him out of it, thinking it wouldn't succeed, as they believed one newspaper was enough for America. At that time (1771), there were at least twenty-five.[5] Still, he moved forward with the project; I helped by delivering the papers to customers after working on typesetting and printing the sheets. He had some clever friends who enjoyed writing short pieces for his paper, which boosted its reputation and demand, and these gentlemen often came to visit us.

Hearing their conversations and their accounts of the approbation their papers were received with,[Pg 33] I was excited to try my hand among them; but being still a boy, and suspecting that my brother would object to printing anything of mine in his paper if he knew it to be mine, I contrived to disguise my hand, and, writing an anonymous paper, I put it at night under the door of the printing-house. It was found in the morning, and committed to his writing friends when they called in as usual. They read it, commented on it in my hearing, and I had the exquisite pleasure of finding it had met with their approbation, and that, in their different guesses at the author, none were named but men of some character among us for learning and ingenuity. I suppose that I was rather lucky in my judges, and they were not really so very good as I then believed them to be.

Listening to their conversations and their comments about how well their articles were received, [Pg 33] I felt excited to give it a try myself. But since I was still a kid and I thought my brother would refuse to publish anything of mine if he knew it was mine, I decided to disguise my handwriting. I wrote an anonymous article and slipped it under the door of the printing house at night. It was found in the morning and given to his writing friends when they dropped by as usual. They read it, discussed it while I listened, and I took great pleasure in realizing they liked it. Fortunately, when they tried to guess who the author was, they only named men who were respected for their knowledge and creativity. I guess I was a bit lucky with my audience, and they probably weren't as great as I thought they were back then.

Encouraged, however, by this attempt, I wrote and sent in the same way to the press several other pieces that were equally approved; and I kept my secret till all my fund of sense for such performances was exhausted, and then discovered it, when I began to be considered with a little more attention by my brother's acquaintance. However, that did not quite please him, as he thought it tended to make me too vain. This might be one occasion of the differences we began to have about this time. Though a brother, he considered himself as my master, and me as his apprentice, and, accordingly, expected the same services from me as he would from another, while I thought he degraded me too much in some he required of me, who from a brother required more indulgence. Our disputes were often brought before our father, and I fancy I was either generally in the right, or else a better pleader, because the judgment was generally in my favour. But my brother was passionate, and had often beaten me, which I took extremely amiss; and thinking my apprenticeship very tedious, I was continually wishing for some opportunity of shortening[Pg 34] it, which at length offered in a manner unexpected.

Feeling encouraged by my first attempt, I wrote and sent several other pieces to the press, which were also well received. I kept my writing secret until I had run out of ideas, and then I revealed it when my brother's friends started to pay me more attention. However, my brother wasn’t too pleased; he thought it made me too conceited. This may have been one reason for the disagreements we started to have around that time. Although we were brothers, he saw himself as my master and me as his apprentice, expecting the same work from me that he would from anyone else. I felt that some of what he asked of me was too much for a brother and that I deserved more understanding. Our arguments often reached our father, and I believe I was usually in the right or at least a better advocate for myself, since the decisions often favored me. But my brother was hot-headed and had frequently hit me, which I didn't take well at all. Feeling that my apprenticeship was dragging on, I constantly hoped for a chance to cut it short, which eventually came in an unexpected way.

Perhaps the harsh and tyrannical treatment of me might be a means of impressing me with the aversion to arbitrary power that has stuck to me through my whole life.

Perhaps the harsh and oppressive treatment I received might be a way of instilling in me a lasting aversion to arbitrary power that has stayed with me throughout my life.

One of the pieces in our newspaper on some political point, which I have now forgotten, gave offence to the Assembly. He was taken up, censured, and imprisoned for a month, by the speaker's warrant, I suppose, because he would not discover the author. I, too, was taken up and examined before the council: but though I did not give them any satisfaction, they contented themselves with admonishing me, and dismissed me, considering me, perhaps, as an apprentice, who was bound to keep his master's secrets.

One of the articles in our newspaper about some political issue, which I can’t remember now, upset the Assembly. The writer was arrested, criticized, and jailed for a month, I assume by the speaker’s order, because he wouldn’t reveal the author. I was also questioned and examined by the council: but even though I didn’t satisfy their inquiries, they were okay with just warning me and letting me go, thinking of me, perhaps, as an apprentice who was required to keep his master’s secrets.

During my brother's confinement, which I resented a good deal notwithstanding our differences, I had the management of the paper; and I made bold to give our rulers some rubs in it, which my brother took very kindly, while others began to consider me in an unfavourable light, as a youth that had a turn for libelling and satire. My brother's discharge was accompanied with an order (and a very odd one), that "James Franklin should no longer print the newspaper called the New-England Courant."

During my brother's time in prison, which I really disliked despite our differences, I ran the paper. I took the liberty to criticize our leaders a bit in it, which my brother appreciated, but others started to view me negatively, as a young person who had a knack for libel and satire. When my brother was released, it came with a strange order that "James Franklin should no longer print the newspaper called the New-England Courant."

On a consultation held in our printing-office among his friends, what he should do in this conjuncture, it was proposed to elude the order by changing the name of the paper; but my brother, seeing inconveniences in this, came to a conclusion, as a better way, to let the paper in future be printed in the name of Benjamin Franklin: and in order to avoid the censure of the Assembly, that might fall on him as still printing it by his apprentice, he contrived and consented that my old indenture should be returned to me, with a discharge on the back of it, to show[Pg 35] in case of necessity; and, in order to secure to him the benefit of my service, I should sign new indentures for the remainder of my time, which was to be kept private. A very flimsy scheme it was; however, it was immediately executed, and the paper was printed, accordingly, under my name for several months. At length, a fresh difference arising between my brother and me, I took upon me to assert my freedom, presuming that he would not venture to produce the new indentures. It was not fair in me to take this advantage, and this I therefore reckon as one of the first errata of my life; but the unfairness of it weighed little with me, when under the impression of resentment for the blows his passion too often urged him to bestow upon me; though he was otherwise not an ill-natured man: perhaps I was too saucy and provoking.

During a meeting at our printing office with his friends, we discussed what he should do in this situation. It was suggested that we could bypass the order by changing the name of the paper; however, my brother identified some issues with this idea. Instead, he decided it would be better to have the paper printed under the name of Ben Franklin. To avoid the Assembly's criticism, which might target him for still printing through his apprentice, he arranged for my old indenture to be returned to me, with a discharge on the back as proof, to show[Pg 35] if needed. To ensure he still benefited from my work, I would sign new indentures for the remaining time, which was to be kept private. It was a rather flimsy plan, but it was put into action immediately, and the paper was printed under my name for several months. Eventually, a new disagreement arose between my brother and me, and I decided to claim my freedom, believing he wouldn't dare to present the new indentures. It wasn’t right for me to take advantage of that situation, and I consider it one of the first mistakes of my life. However, the unfairness of it didn't weigh heavily on me at the time, as I was feeling resentful from the frequent blows his temper led him to inflict on me; although he wasn't typically a bad-natured person: maybe I was just too brash and provocative.

When he found I would leave him, he took care to prevent my getting employment in any other printing-house in town, by going round and speaking to every master, who accordingly refused to give me work. I then thought of going to New-York, as the nearest place where there was a printer; and I was rather inclined to leave Boston, when I reflected that I had already made myself a little obnoxious to the governing party, and, from the arbitrary proceedings of the Assembly in my brother's case, it was likely I might, if I stayed, soon bring myself into scrapes; and farther, that my indiscreet disputations about religion began to make me pointed at with horror by good people, as an infidel or atheist. I concluded, therefore, to remove to New-York; but my father now siding with my brother, I was sensible, that if I attempted to go openly, means would be used to prevent me. My friend Collins, therefore, undertook to manage my flight. He agreed with the captain of a New-York sloop to take me. I sold my books to raise a little money, was taken on board the sloop privately, had a fair[Pg 36] wind, and in three days found myself at New-York, near three hundred miles from my home, at the age of seventeen, without the least recommendation or knowledge of any person in the place, and very little money in my pocket.

When he realized I was planning to leave him, he made sure to stop me from getting a job at any other printing shop in town by going around and talking to every owner, who then refused to hire me. I started thinking about moving to New York, as it was the closest place with a printer; I was leaning toward leaving Boston when I considered that I had already made myself somewhat unpopular with the governing group. Given the arbitrary actions of the Assembly in my brother's situation, I figured that if I stayed, I would soon get into trouble. Additionally, my outspoken debates about religion were starting to make good people view me with disapproval, seeing me as an infidel or atheist. So, I decided to move to New York. However, since my father now sided with my brother, I realized that if I tried to leave openly, measures would be taken to stop me. My friend Collins agreed to help me escape. He arranged with the captain of a New York sloop to take me. I sold my books to gather some money, boarded the sloop discreetly, had a favorable wind, and in three days found myself in New York, nearly three hundred miles from home, at seventeen, with no recommendations or connections in the city, and very little money in my pocket.

The inclination I had felt for the sea was by this time done away, or I might now have gratified it. But having another profession, and conceiving myself a pretty good workman, I offered my services to a printer of the place, old Mr W. Bradford, who had been the first printer in Pennsylvania, but had removed thence, in consequence of a quarrel with the governor, General Keith. He could give me no employment, having little to do, and hands enough already. But he said, "My son, at Philadelphia, has lately lost his principal hand, Aquilla Rose, by death; if you go thither, I believe he may employ you." Philadelphia was one hundred miles farther; I set out, however, in a boat for Amboy, leaving my chest and things to follow me round by sea. In crossing the bay we met with a squall that tore our rotten sails to pieces, prevented our getting into the kill, and drove us upon Long Island. In our way, a drunken Dutchman, who was a passenger too, fell overboard; when he was sinking, I reached through the water to his shock pate, and drew him up, so that we got him in again. His ducking sobered him a little, and he went to sleep, taking first out of his pocket a book which he desired I would dry for him. It proved to be my old favourite author, Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress, in Dutch, finely printed on good paper, copper cuts, a dress better than I had ever seen it wear in its own language. I have since found that it has been translated into most of the languages of Europe, and suppose it has been more generally read than any other book, except perhaps the Bible. Honest John was the first that I know of who mixed narration and dialogue; a method of writing very engaging to the reader, who, in the[Pg 37] most interesting parts, finds himself, as it were, admitted into the company and present at the conversation. De Foe has imitated him successfully in his Robinson Crusoe, in his Moll Flanders, and other pieces; and Richardson has done the same in his Pamela, &c.

The interest I once had in the sea was gone by this time, or I might have pursued it. Instead, I had another job in mind and considered myself a decent worker, so I offered my services to a local printer, old Mr. W. Bradford, who was the first printer in Pennsylvania but had left because of a disagreement with the governor, General Keith. He couldn’t offer me any work since he had little to do and already enough workers. However, he mentioned, "My son in Philadelphia recently lost his main worker, Aquilla Rose, to death; if you go there, I think he might hire you." Philadelphia was a hundred miles farther away, but I decided to set off in a boat to Amboy, leaving my chest and belongings to catch up by sea. While crossing the bay, we encountered a squall that ripped our tattered sails to shreds, kept us from entering the kill, and pushed us onto Long Island. Along the way, a drunk Dutchman who was also a passenger fell overboard; as he was sinking, I reached through the water for his bald head and pulled him back up so we could get him in again. His dunk in the water sobered him up a bit, and he fell asleep after asking me to dry a book that he had taken from his pocket. It turned out to be my old favorite, Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress, in Dutch, beautifully printed on quality paper with copper engravings, looking better than I had ever seen it in its original language. I’ve since learned that it has been translated into most European languages and is likely more widely read than any other book, except maybe the Bible. Honest John was the first I know of to mix narrative and dialogue; a writing style that really draws in the reader, making them feel like they're part of the discussion during the most engaging moments. Defoe has successfully imitated him in his works like Robinson Crusoe and Moll Flanders, and Richardson has done the same in his Pamela, etc.

On approaching the island, we found it was in a place where there could be no landing, there being a great surf on the stony beach. So we dropped anchor, and swung out our cable towards the shore. Some people came down to the shore and hallooed to us, as we did to them, but the wind was so high and the surf so loud that we could not understand each other. There were some small boats near the shore, and we made signs, and called to them to fetch us; but they either did not comprehend us, or it was impracticable, so they went off. Night approaching, we had no remedy but to have patience till the wind abated, and, in the mean time, the boatmen and myself concluded to sleep if we could; and so we crowded into the hatches, where we joined the Dutchman, who was still wet, and the spray breaking over the head of our boat, leaked through to us, so that we were soon almost as wet as he. In this manner we lay all night with very little rest; but the wind abating the next day, we made a shift to reach Amboy before night, having been thirty hours on the water, without victuals, or any drink but a bottle of filthy rum, the water we sailed on being salt.

As we approached the island, we realized it was in a spot where we couldn't land due to the massive waves crashing on the rocky beach. So, we dropped anchor and extended our cable toward the shore. Some folks came down to the beach and shouted to us, just as we called out to them, but the wind was so strong and the surf so loud that we couldn't understand each other. There were a few small boats near the shore, and we signaled and called for them to come get us; however, they either didn't understand us, or it was impossible for them to help, so they left. With night coming, we had no choice but to wait until the wind calmed down. In the meantime, the boatmen and I decided to try to sleep if we could, so we squeezed into the hatches with the Dutchman, who was still wet, and the spray from the waves hitting our boat leaked in, making us almost as wet as he was. We spent the whole night this way, getting very little rest; but when the wind eased the next day, we managed to make our way to Amboy before nightfall, having been on the water for thirty hours without food or anything to drink except for a bottle of awful rum, as the water we were sailing on was salty.

In the evening I found myself very feverish, and went to bed; but having read somewhere that cold water drank plentifully was good for a fever, I followed the prescription, and sweat plentifully most of the night: my fever left me, and in the morning crossing the ferry, I proceeded on my journey on foot, having fifty miles to Burlington, where I was told I should find boats that would carry me the rest of the way to Philadelphia.[Pg 38]

In the evening, I felt really feverish and went to bed. However, I had read somewhere that drinking lots of cold water was good for a fever, so I tried that and ended up sweating a lot most of the night. My fever went away, and in the morning, after crossing the ferry, I continued my journey on foot, with fifty miles to Burlington, where I was told I'd find boats that could take me the rest of the way to Philadelphia.[Pg 38]

It rained very hard all the day; I was thoroughly soaked, and by noon a good deal tired, so I stopped at a poor inn, where I stayed all night, beginning now to wish I had never left home. I made so miserable a figure too, that I found, by the questions asked me, I was suspected to be some runaway indentured servant, and in danger of being taken up on that suspicion. However, I proceeded next day, and got in the evening to an inn within eight or ten miles of Burlington, kept by one Dr. Brown. He entered into conversation with me while I took some refreshment, and, finding I had read a little, became very obliging and friendly. Our acquaintance continued all the rest of his life. He had been, I imagine, an ambulatory quack doctor, for there was no town in England, or any country in Europe, of which he could not give a very particular account. He had some letters, and was ingenious; but he was an infidel, and wickedly undertook, some years after, to turn the Bible into doggerel verse, as Cotton had formerly done with Virgil. By this means he set many facts in a ridiculous light, and might have done mischief with weak minds if his work had been published; but it never was. At his house I lay that night, and arrived the next morning at Burlington, but had the mortification to find that the regular boats had gone a little before, and no other expected to go before Tuesday, this being Saturday. Wherefore I returned to an old woman in the town, of whom I had bought some gingerbread to eat on the water, and asked her advice; she proposed to lodge me till a passage by some other boat occurred. I accepted her offer, being much fatigued by travelling on foot. Understanding I was a printer, she would have had me remain in that town and follow my business, being ignorant what stock was necessary to begin with. She was very hospitable, gave me a dinner of ox-cheek with a great good-will, accepting only of a pot of[Pg 39] ale in return; and I thought myself fixed till Tuesday should come. However, walking in the evening by the side of the river, a boat came by which I found was going towards Philadelphia, with several people in her. They took me in, and as there was no wind, we rowed all the way; and about midnight, not having yet seen the city, some of the company were confident we must have passed it, and would row no farther: the others knew not where we were, so we put towards the shore, got into a creek, landed near an old fence, with the rails of which we made a fire, the night being cold, in October, and there we remained till daylight. Then one of the company knew the place to be Cooper's Creek, a little above Philadelphia, which we saw as soon as we got out of the creek, and arrived there about eight or nine o'clock, on the Sunday morning, and landed at Market-street wharf.

It rained heavily all day; I got completely soaked and was quite tired by noon, so I stopped at a run-down inn where I stayed the night, starting to regret that I had ever left home. I looked so miserable that people seemed to suspect I was a runaway indentured servant, and I worried I might be caught because of that. Anyway, I moved on the next day and arrived at an inn about eight or ten miles from Burlington in the evening, run by a guy named Dr. Brown. He talked to me while I had some food, and when he found out I had read a bit, he became very friendly and helpful. We kept in touch for the rest of his life. I think he must have been a traveling quack doctor because he could give detailed accounts of every town in England and anywhere in Europe. He had some letters and was clever, but he was an infidel and wickedly tried to turn the Bible into doggerel verse years later, like Cotton had done with Virgil. This made many facts look ridiculous, and he could have fooled a lot of naive people if his work had ever been published, but it never was. I stayed at his place that night and arrived in Burlington the next morning, only to be disappointed to find that the regular boats had left a little earlier, and no other ones were expected to leave before Tuesday, since it was Saturday. So I went back to an old woman in town, from whom I had bought some gingerbread to eat on the water, and asked for her advice; she suggested I stay with her until another boat came. I accepted her offer, really tired from walking. When she found out I was a printer, she wanted me to stay in town and continue my work, not realizing what supplies I would need to start. She was very welcoming and served me a dinner of ox-cheek with great generosity, only asking for a pot of ale in return, and I thought I would stay there until Tuesday. However, while walking by the river that evening, a boat came by that was heading towards Philadelphia with several people in it. They let me join them, and since there was no wind, we rowed the whole way; around midnight, having still not seen the city, some of the group were sure we must have passed it and refused to row any further. The others had no idea where we were, so we headed toward the shore, got into a creek, and landed near an old fence, where we used some rails to make a fire because it was cold that October night, and we stayed there until dawn. Then one of them recognized the place as Cooper's Creek, just above Philadelphia, which we saw as soon as we got out of the creek, and we reached there around eight or nine o'clock on Sunday morning, landing at Market Street Wharf.

I have been the more particular in this description of my journey, and shall be so of my first entry into that city, that you may in your mind compare such unlikely beginnings with the figure I have since made there. I was in my working dress, my best clothes coming round by sea. I was dirty, from my being so long in the boat; my pockets were stuffed out with shirts and stockings, and I knew no one, nor where to look for lodging. Fatigued with walking, rowing, and the want of sleep, I was very hungry; and my whole stock of cash consisted in a single dollar, and about a shilling in copper coin, which I gave to the boatmen for my passage. At first they refused it on account of my having rowed, but I insisted on their taking it. Man is sometimes more generous when he has little money than when he has plenty; perhaps to prevent his being thought to have but little. I walked towards the top of the street, gazing about, still in Market-street, where I met a boy with bread. I had often made a meal of dry bread, and inquiring[Pg 40] where he had bought it, I went immediately to the baker's he directed me to. I asked for biscuits, meaning such as we had at Boston: that sort, it seems, was not made in Philadelphia. I then asked for a threepenny loaf, and was told they had none. Not knowing the different prices, nor the names of the different sorts of bread, I told him to give me threepenny worth of any sort. He gave me, accordingly, three great puffy rolls. I was surprised at the quantity, but took it, and having no room in my pockets, walked off with a roll under each arm, and eating the other. Thus I went up Market-street as far as Fourth-street, passing by the door of Mr. Read, my future wife's father; when she, standing at the door, saw me, and thought I made, as I certainly did, a most awkward, ridiculous appearance. Then I turned and went down Chestnut-street and part of Walnut-street, eating my roll all the way, and, coming round, found myself again at Market-street wharf, near the boat I came in, to which I went for a draught of the river water; and, being filled with one of my rolls, gave the other two to a woman and her child that came down the river in the boat with us, and were waiting to go farther. Thus refreshed, I walked again up the street, which by this time had many clean-dressed people in it, who were all walking the same way: I joined them, and thereby was led into the great meeting-house of the Quakers near the market. I sat down among them, and after looking round awhile, and hearing nothing said, being very drowsy, through labour and want of rest the preceding night, I fell fast asleep, and continued so till the meeting broke up, when some one was kind enough to rouse me. This, therefore, was the first house I was in, or slept in, in Philadelphia.

I’ve been detailed in describing my journey and especially my first entry into that city so you can compare those unlikely beginnings to the person I’ve become there. I was in my work clothes, as my nicer outfit was still on its way by sea. I was dirty from being on the boat for so long, my pockets stuffed with shirts and socks, and I didn’t know anyone or where to find a place to stay. Exhausted from walking, rowing, and lack of sleep, I was really hungry, and all I had was a single dollar and about a shilling in coins, which I paid to the boatmen for my ride. At first, they refused it because I had rowed, but I insisted they take it. Sometimes a person is more generous when they have little money than when they have a lot, maybe to avoid being seen as poor. I walked up the street, looking around on Market Street until I saw a boy with bread. I had often eaten dry bread before, so I asked him where he bought it, and he directed me to a bakery. I asked for biscuits like the ones we had in Boston, but it turned out they didn’t make those in Philadelphia. Then I asked for a threepenny loaf, but they didn’t have any. Not knowing the different prices or types of bread, I told him to give me threepenny worth of anything. He handed me three huge rolls. I was surprised by the amount, but I took them since I didn’t have room in my pockets, so I walked off with one under each arm, eating the other. I made my way up Market Street to Fourth Street, passing by the door of Mr. Read, my future wife's father. When she saw me, she probably thought I looked really awkward and ridiculous. I then turned and went down Chestnut Street and part of Walnut Street, eating my roll the whole time, and when I circled back, I found myself again at the Market Street wharf, near the boat I arrived on, where I went for a drink of river water. After finishing one of my rolls, I gave the other two to a woman and her child who had traveled down the river with us and were waiting to go further. So refreshed, I walked back up the street, which now had many well-dressed people in it, all heading in the same direction. I joined them and was led into the big Quaker meeting house near the market. I sat down among them and, after looking around for a while and hearing nothing, I was so drowsy from all the labor and lack of sleep the night before that I fell fast asleep and stayed that way until the meeting ended, when someone kindly woke me up. This was, therefore, the first place I entered, or slept in, in Philadelphia.

I then walked down towards the river, and looking in the faces of every one, I met a young Quaker man whose countenance pleased me, and, accosting[Pg 41] him, requested he would tell me where a stranger could get a lodging. We were then near the sign of the Three Mariners. "Here," said he, "is a house where they receive strangers, but it is not a reputable one; if thou wilt walk with me, I'll show thee a better one;" and he conducted me to the Crooked Billet in Water-street. There I got a dinner; and, while I was eating, several questions were asked me, as from my youth and appearance I was suspected of being a runaway. After dinner, my host having shown me to a bed, I lay myself on it, without undressing, and slept till six in the evening, when I was called to supper. I went to bed again very early, and slept very soundly till next morning. Then I dressed myself as neat as I could, and went to Andrew Bradford, the printer's. I found in the shop the old man, his father, whom I had seen at New-York, and who, travelling on horseback, had got to Philadelphia before me. He introduced me to his son, who received me civilly, gave me a breakfast, and told me he did not at present want a hand, being lately supplied with one: but there was another printer in town lately set up, one Keimer, who perhaps might employ me; if not, I should be welcome to lodge at his house, and he would give me a little work to do now and then, till fuller business should offer.

I walked down towards the river and, looking at everyone’s faces, I met a young Quaker man whose face I liked. I approached him and asked if he could tell me where a stranger could find a place to stay. We were close to the Three Mariners sign. "Here," he said, "is a place that takes in strangers, but it's not very reputable; if you walk with me, I'll show you a better one." He took me to the Crooked Billet on Water Street. There, I had dinner, and while I was eating, several people asked me questions since, based on my youth and appearance, they thought I might be a runaway. After dinner, my host showed me to a bed, and I lay down on it without taking off my clothes and slept until six in the evening when I was called for supper. I went to bed again pretty early and slept soundly until the next morning. Then I dressed as neatly as I could and went to Andrew Bradford, the printer. In the shop, I found the old man, his father, whom I had seen in New York, and who had traveled on horseback to Philadelphia before me. He introduced me to his son, who welcomed me, gave me breakfast, and told me he didn’t need any help at the moment since he had just hired someone. But there was another printer in town, a guy named Keimer, who might need help; if not, I was welcome to stay at his place, and he’d give me a little work here and there until more opportunities came up.

The old gentleman said he would go with me to the new printer; and when we found him, "Neighbour," said Bradford, "I have brought to see you a young man of your business; perhaps you may want such a one." He asked me a few questions, put a composing stick in my hand to see how I worked, and then said he would employ me soon, though he had just then nothing for me to do; and taking old Bradford, whom he had never seen before, to be one of the town's people that had a good will for him, entered into conversation on his present undertaking and prospects; while Bradford (not discovering[Pg 42] that he was the other printer's father), on Keimer's saying he expected soon to get the greatest part of the business into his own hands, drew him on by artful questions, and starting little doubts, to explain all his views, what influence he relied on, and in what manner he intended to proceed. I, who stood by and heard all, saw immediately that one was a crafty old sophister, and the other a true novice. Bradford left me with Keimer, who was greatly surprised when I told him who the old man was.

The old man said he would accompany me to the new printer, and when we found him, "Neighbor," said Bradford, "I've brought a young man who might be useful to you." He asked me a few questions, handed me a composing stick to see how I worked, and then said he would hire me soon, even though he didn't have anything for me to do at that moment. He then engaged in conversation with old Bradford, whom he had never seen before, thinking he was just another local who liked him. They talked about his current project and future plans, while Bradford, not realizing that he was the father of the other printer, prompted Keimer with clever questions and small doubts to get him to clarify his plans, the support he was counting on, and how he intended to move forward. Standing by, I quickly recognized that one was a sly old trickster, and the other a complete novice. Bradford left me with Keimer, who was quite taken aback when I revealed who the old man was.

The printing-house, I found, consisted of an old damaged press, and a small worn-out fount of English types which he was using himself, composing an elegy on Aquilla Rose, before mentioned; an ingenious young man, of excellent character, much respected in the town, secretary to the Assembly, and a pretty poet. Keimer made verses too, but very indifferently. He could not be said to write them, for his method was to compose them in the types directly out of his head; there being no copy, but one pair of cases, and the elegy probably requiring all the letter, no one could help him. I endeavoured to put his press (which he had not yet used, and of which he understood nothing) into order to be worked with; and, promising to come and print off his elegy as soon as he should have got it ready, I returned to Bradford's, who gave me a little job to do for the present, and there I lodged and dieted. A few days after Keimer sent for me to print off the elegy. And now he had got another pair of cases, and a pamphlet to reprint, on which he set me to work.

The printing house I discovered had an old, broken press and a small set of worn-out English type that he was using himself to write an elegy for Aquilla Rose, who I mentioned earlier. Aquilla was a clever young man with a great reputation in town, serving as the secretary to the Assembly and a decent poet. Keimer also wrote poetry, but it was pretty mediocre. He couldn’t really be said to wrote them since he just composed them directly in type from memory; he had no copies, just one set of cases, and since the elegy probably used all the letters, nobody could assist him. I tried to fix his press (which he hadn’t used yet and knew nothing about) so it could be operational. I promised to come back and print his elegy as soon as it was ready, and then I returned to Bradford's, where I was given a small job for the time being, and that’s where I stayed and ate. A few days later, Keimer called for me to print the elegy. By then, he had acquired another set of cases and a pamphlet to reprint, so he set me to work on that.

These two printers I found poorly qualified for their business. Bradford had been bred to it, and was very illiterate; and Keimer, though something of a scholar, was a mere compositor, knowing nothing of presswork. He had been one of the French prophets, and could act their enthusiastic agitations. At this time he did not profess any particular religion,[Pg 43] but something of all on occasion; was very ignorant of the world, and had, as I afterward found, a good deal of the knave in his composition. He did not like my lodging at Bradford's while I worked with him. He had a house, indeed, but without furniture, so he could not lodge me; but he got me a lodging at Mr. Read's, before mentioned, who was the owner of his house; and my chest of clothes being come by this time, I made rather a more respectable appearance in the eyes of Miss Read than I had done when she first happened to see me eating my roll in the street.

I found these two printers to be poorly suited for their work. Bradford had grown up in the field but was quite uneducated, while Keimer, although somewhat knowledgeable, was just a typesetter and knew nothing about operating a press. He had been one of the French prophets and could mimic their enthusiastic behavior. At that time, he didn’t claim any specific religion but dabbled in a bit of everything; he was quite clueless about the world and, as I later discovered, had a fair amount of trickiness in him. He wasn’t fond of me staying at Bradford's place while working with him. He did have a house, but it had no furniture, so he couldn’t accommodate me. Instead, he arranged for me to stay at Mr. Read's, the owner of his house. By then, my chest of clothes had arrived, so I made a somewhat more respectable impression on Miss Read than when she first saw me eating my roll in the street.[Pg 43]

I began now to have some acquaintance among the young people of the town that were lovers of reading, with whom I spent my evenings very pleasantly, and gained money by my industry and frugality. I lived very contented, and forgot Boston as much as I could, and did not wish it should be known where I resided, except to my friend Collins, who was in the secret, and kept it faithfully. At length, however, an incident happened that occasioned my return home much sooner than I had intended. I had a brother-in-law, Robert Holmes, master of a sloop that traded between Boston and Delaware. He being at Newcastle, forty miles below Philadelphia, and hearing of me, wrote me a letter, mentioning the grief of my relations and friends in Boston at my abrupt departure, assuring me of their good-will towards me, and that everything would be accommodated to my mind if I would return, to which he entreated me earnestly. I wrote an answer to his letter, thanking him for his advice, but stated my reasons for quitting Boston so fully, and in such a light, as to convince him that I was not so much in the wrong as he had apprehended.

I started to get to know some of the young people in town who loved reading, and I spent my evenings with them happily while also earning money through hard work and being thrifty. I lived quite contentedly, tried to forget about Boston as much as possible, and didn’t want anyone to know where I was living—except for my friend Collins, who was in on the secret and kept it safe. Eventually, though, something happened that made me go back home much sooner than I had planned. I had a brother-in-law named Robert Holmes, who was the captain of a sloop that traded between Boston and Delaware. While he was in Newcastle, about forty miles below Philadelphia, he heard about me and wrote me a letter mentioning how my family and friends in Boston were upset about my sudden departure. He assured me that they all meant well and everything would be sorted out if I decided to come back, and he urged me to return. I replied to his letter, thanked him for his advice, but explained my reasons for leaving Boston in such detail that I hoped to show him I wasn’t as wrong as he thought.

Sir William Keith, governor of the province, was then at Newcastle, and Captain Holmes happening to be in company with him when my letter came to[Pg 44] hand, spoke to him of me, and showed him the letter. The governor read it, and seemed surprised when he was told my age. He said I appeared a young man of promising parts, and, therefore, should be encouraged: the printers at Philadelphia were wretched ones, and if I would set up there, he made no doubt I should succeed; for his part, he would procure me the public business, and do me every other service in his power. This my brother-in-law Holmes afterward told me in Boston, but I knew as yet nothing of it; when one day, Keimer and I being at work together near the window, we saw the governor and another gentleman (who proved to be Colonel French, of Newcastle, in the province of Delaware), finely dressed, come directly across the street to our house, and heard them at the door. Keimer ran down immediately, thinking it a visit to him; but the governor inquired for me, came up, and, with a condescension and politeness I had been quite unused to, made me many compliments, desired to be acquainted with me, blamed me kindly for not having made myself known to him when I first came to the place, and would have me away with him to the tavern, where he was going with Colonel French to taste, as he said, some excellent Madeira. I was not a little surprised, and Keimer stared with astonishment. I went, however, with the governor and Colonel French to a tavern at the corner of Third-street, and over the Madeira he proposed my setting up my business. He stated the probabilities of my success, and both he and Colonel French assured me I should have their interest and influence to obtain for me the public business of both governments. And as I expressed doubts that my father would assist me in it, Sir William said he would give me a letter to him, in which he would set forth the advantages, and he did not doubt he should determine him to comply. So it was concluded I should return to Boston by the[Pg 45] first vessel, with the governor's letter to my father. In the mean time it was to be kept a secret, and I went on working with Keimer as usual. The governor sent for me now and then to dine with him, which I considered a great honour, more particularly as he conversed with me in the most affable, familiar, and friendly manner.

Sir William Keith, the governor of the province, was in Newcastle at the time. Captain Holmes was with him when my letter arrived at[Pg 44]. He mentioned me and showed him the letter. The governor read it and seemed surprised when he learned my age. He said I seemed like a promising young man and should be encouraged; he thought the printers in Philadelphia were terrible and that if I set up shop there, I would definitely succeed. He offered to help me with public business and any other support I needed. This was something my brother-in-law Holmes later told me in Boston, but at that moment, I had no idea about it. One day, while Keimer and I were working together near the window, we saw the governor and another gentleman, who turned out to be Colonel French from Newcastle in Delaware, dressed nicely, walking straight across the street to our house. We heard them at the door. Keimer rushed downstairs, thinking the visit was for him, but the governor asked for me. He came upstairs and, with a friendliness and politeness I wasn't used to, complimented me, expressed a desire to get to know me, gently scolded me for not introducing myself when I first arrived, and invited me to join him and Colonel French at a tavern to sample some excellent Madeira. I was quite surprised, and Keimer looked astonished. Nevertheless, I went with the governor and Colonel French to a tavern on the corner of Third Street, where he suggested I start my own business. He outlined the chances of my success, and both he and Colonel French assured me they would support me in getting public business from both governments. When I mentioned that I doubted my father would help, Sir William offered to write him a letter detailing the advantages, saying he was confident it would persuade him to agree. We decided that I would return to Boston on the[Pg 45] first ship with the governor's letter for my father. In the meantime, it was to be kept secret, and I returned to working with Keimer as usual. The governor occasionally invited me to dine with him, which I saw as a significant honor, especially since he spoke to me in the most friendly and informal way.

About the end of April, 1724, a little vessel offered for Boston. I took leave of Keimer as going to see my friends. The governor gave me an ample letter, saying many flattering things of me to my father, and strongly recommending the project of my setting up at Philadelphia, as a thing that would make my fortune. We struck on a shoal in going down the bay, and sprung a leak; we had a blustering time at sea, and were obliged to pump almost continually, at which I took my turn. We arrived safe, however, at Boston, in about a fortnight. I had been absent seven months, and my friends had heard nothing of me; for my brother Holmes was not yet returned, and had not written about me. My unexpected appearance surprised the family; all were, however, very glad to see me, and made me welcome, except my brother: I went to see him at his printing-house. I was better dressed than ever while in his service, having a genteel new suit from head to foot, a watch, and my pockets lined with near five pounds sterling in silver. He received me not very frankly, looked me all over, and turned to his work again. The journeymen were inquisitive where I had been, what sort of a country it was, and how I liked it. I praised it much, and the happy life I led in it, expressing strongly my intention of returning to it; and one of them asking what kind of money we had there, I produced a handful of silver and spread it before them, which was a kind of raree-show they had not been used to, paper being the money of Boston. Then I took an opportunity of letting them see my watch; and,[Pg 46] lastly (my brother still grum and sullen), gave them a dollar to drink and took my leave. This visit of mine offended him extremely. For when my mother some time after spoke to him of a reconciliation, and of her wish to see us on good terms together, and that we might live for the future as brothers, he said I had insulted him in such a manner before his people, that he could never forget or forgive it. In this, however, he was mistaken.

About the end of April 1724, a small ship set sail for Boston. I said goodbye to Keimer, claiming I was going to visit my friends. The governor gave me a detailed letter, saying many nice things about me to my father and strongly recommending that I set up my business in Philadelphia, suggesting it would make me successful. We hit a sandbar while going down the bay and started leaking; it was rough at sea, and we had to pump continuously, taking turns. However, we arrived safely in Boston after about two weeks. I had been away for seven months, and my friends hadn’t heard from me because my brother Holmes hadn’t returned yet and hadn’t written about me. My unexpected arrival surprised the family; everyone was happy to see me and welcomed me, except for my brother. I went to visit him at his printing shop. I was better dressed than ever during my time in his service, wearing a sharp new suit from head to toe, a watch, and my pockets lined with nearly five pounds of silver. He didn’t greet me very warmly, took a look at me, and went back to his work. The workers were curious about where I had been, what the place was like, and how I liked it. I praised the place and the great life I had there, clearly expressing my intention to return. When one of them asked about the type of money we had, I showed them a handful of silver, spreading it out in front of them, which was quite a show since they were used to paper money in Boston. Then, I took the opportunity to show them my watch; and, [Pg 46] finally (with my brother still grumpy), I gave them a dollar to drink and said my goodbyes. My visit really upset him. Later, when my mother mentioned reconciliation and her wish for us to be on good terms, he said I had insulted him in front of his people in a way he could never forget or forgive. However, he was mistaken about that.

My father received the governor's letter with some surprise, but said little of it to me for some time. Captain Holmes returning, he showed it to him, and asked him if he knew Sir William Keith, and what kind of a man he was; adding, that he must be of small discretion to think of setting a youth up in business who wanted three years to arrive at man's estate. Holmes said what he could in favour of the project, but my father was decidedly against it, and at last gave a flat denial. He wrote a civil letter to Sir William, thanking him for the patronage he had so kindly offered me, and declining to assist me as yet in setting up, I being, in his opinion, too young to be trusted with the management of an undertaking so important, and for which the preparation required a considerable expenditure.

My father was a bit surprised when he received the governor's letter, but he didn't say much about it to me for a while. When Captain Holmes returned, he showed it to him and asked if he knew Sir William Keith and what kind of person he was. He added that Sir William must not be very wise to think about starting a business for a kid who needed three more years to be considered an adult. Holmes said what he could to support the idea, but my father was firmly against it and eventually flat-out refused. He wrote a polite letter to Sir William, thanking him for the generous offer he had made and declining to help me start a business because he believed I was too young to handle such an important venture, which would also require a significant investment.

My old companion, Collins, who was a clerk in the postoffice, pleased with the account I gave him of my new country, determined to go thither also; and while I waited for my father's determination, he set out before me by land to Rhode Island, leaving his books, which were a pretty collection of mathematics and natural philosophy, to come with mine and me to New-York, where he proposed to wait for me.

My old friend, Collins, who worked as a clerk in the post office, was so excited by the description I gave him of my new home that he decided to go there too. While I was waiting for my father's decision, he left ahead of me by land to Rhode Island, leaving behind his books—an impressive collection of math and natural philosophy—to come with mine and me to New York, where he planned to wait for me.

My father, though he did not approve Sir William's proposition, was yet pleased that I had been able to obtain so advantageous a character from a person of such note where I had resided, and that I had been so industrious and careful as to equip[Pg 47] myself so handsomely in so short a time; therefore, seeing no prospect of an accommodation between my brother and me, he gave his consent to my returning again to Philadelphia, advised me to behave respectfully to the people there, endeavour to obtain the general esteem, and avoid lampooning and libelling, to which he thought I had too much inclination: telling me, that by steady industry and prudent parsimony, I might save enough by the time I was one-and-twenty to set me up; and that, if I came near the matter, he would help me out with the rest. This was all I could obtain, except some small gifts, as tokens of his and my mother's love, when I embarked again for New-York, now with their approbation and their blessing. The sloop putting in at Newport, Rhode Island, I visited my brother John, who had been married and settled there some years. He received me very affectionately, for he always loved me. A friend of his, one Vernon, having some money due him in Pennsylvania (about thirty-five pounds currency), desired I would recover it for him, and keep it till I had his directions what to employ it in. Accordingly, he gave me an order to receive it. This business afterward occasioned me a good deal of uneasiness.

My father, although he didn't agree with Sir William's proposal, was still pleased that I managed to get such a great recommendation from someone important in the place where I had lived. He also appreciated that I had worked hard and was careful enough to set myself up so nicely in a short time. So, seeing no chance of a reconciliation between my brother and me, he agreed to let me go back to Philadelphia. He advised me to treat people there with respect, try to gain their respect in return, and avoid making fun of or criticizing others too much since he thought I had a tendency to do that. He told me that if I worked steadily and saved wisely, I could have enough money by the time I turned twenty-one to get started, and if I was close, he would help me out with the rest. This was all I could get from him, except for some small gifts as tokens of love from him and my mother, when I set off again for New York, now with their approval and blessing. The sloop stopped in Newport, Rhode Island, where I visited my brother John, who had been married and lived there for a few years. He welcomed me warmly since he always cared for me. A friend of his, named Vernon, had some money owed to him in Pennsylvania (about thirty-five pounds), and he asked me to collect it for him and hold onto it until he told me what to do with it. So, he gave me an order to receive the money. This situation later caused me a fair amount of stress.

At Newport we took in a number of passengers, among which were two young women travelling together, and a sensible, matron-like Quaker lady, with her servants. I had shown an obliging disposition to render her some little services, which probably impressed her with sentiments of good-will towards me; for, when she witnessed the daily growing familiarity between the young women and myself, which they appeared to encourage, she took me aside and said, "Young man, I am concerned for thee, as thou hast no friend with thee, and seemest not to know much of the world, or of the snares youth is exposed to: depend upon it, these are very bad women. I can see it by all their actions;[Pg 48] and if thou art not upon thy guard, they will draw thee into some danger: they are strangers to thee, and I advise thee, in a friendly concern for thy welfare, to have no acquaintance with them." As I seemed at first not to think so ill of them as she did, she mentioned some things she had observed and heard that had escaped my notice, but now convinced me she was right. I thanked her for her kind advice, and promised to follow it. When we arrived at New-York, they told me where they lived, and invited me to come and see them, but I avoided it, and it was well I did; for the next day the captain missed a silver spoon, and some other things that had been taken out of his cabin; and knowing that these were women of bad character, he got a warrant to search their lodgings, found the stolen goods, and had the thieves punished. So, though we had escaped a sunken rock, which we scraped upon in the passage, I thought this escape of rather more importance to me.

At Newport, we picked up several passengers, including two young women traveling together and a sensible, motherly Quaker lady with her servants. I had shown a willingness to help her with small tasks, which probably made her feel positively toward me. When she noticed the increasing familiarity between the young women and me, which they seemed to encourage, she pulled me aside and said, "Young man, I’m worried about you, as you have no friends with you and don’t seem to know much about the world or the dangers youth face. Believe me, these are very bad women. I can tell by all their behavior; and if you’re not careful, they will lead you into trouble. They are strangers to you, and I advise you, out of genuine concern for your well-being, to avoid getting involved with them." At first, I didn’t think as poorly of them as she did, but she pointed out some things she had noticed that I had missed, which convinced me she was right. I thanked her for her advice and promised to heed it. When we arrived in New York, they told me where they lived and invited me to visit them, but I passed on it, and it was a good decision; the next day, the captain reported a missing silver spoon and other items from his cabin. Knowing these women had questionable character, he obtained a warrant to search their place, found the stolen goods, and had the thieves penalized. So, even though we had narrowly avoided running aground during the journey, I felt this close call was far more significant for me.

At New-York I found my friend Collins, who had arrived there some time before me. We had been intimate from children, and had read the same books together: but he had the advantage of more time for reading and studying, and a wonderful genius for mathematical learning, in which he far outstripped me. While I lived in Boston, most of my hours of leisure for conversation were spent with him, and he continued a sober as well as industrious lad; was much respected for his learning by several of the clergy and other gentlemen, and seemed to promise making a good figure in life. But during my absence he had acquired a habit of drinking brandy, and I found by his own account, as well as that of others, that he had been drunk every day since his arrival at New-York, and behaved himself in a very extravagant manner. He had gamed too, and lost his money, so that I was obliged to discharge his lodgings, and defray his expenses on the[Pg 49] road and at Philadelphia, which proved a great burden to me. The then governor of New-York, Burnet (son of Bishop Burnet), hearing from the captain that one of the passengers had a great many books on board, desired him to bring me to see him. I waited on him, and should have taken Collins with me had he been sober. The governor received me with great civility, showed me his library, which was a considerable one, and we had a good deal of conversation relative to books and authors. This was the second governor who had done me the honour to take notice of me; and, for a poor boy like me, was very pleasing. We proceeded to Philadelphia. I received on the way Vernon's money, without which we could hardly have finished our journey. Collins wished to be employed in some counting-house; but whether they discovered his dram-drinking by his breath or by his behaviour, though he had some recommendations, he met with no success in any application, and continued lodging and boarding at the same house with me and at my expense. Knowing that I had that money of Vernon's, he was continually borrowing of me, still promising repayment as soon as he should be in business. At length he had got so much of it that I was distressed to think what I should do in case of being called on to remit it. His drinking continued, about which we sometimes quarrelled; for, when a little intoxicated, he was very irritable. Once, in a boat on the Delaware, with some other young men, he refused to row in his turn: "I will be rowed home," said he. "We will not row you," said I. "You must," said he, "or stay all night on the water, just as you please." The others said, "Let us row, what signifies it?" But my mind being soured with his other conduct, I continued to refuse. So he swore he would make me row, or throw me overboard; and coming along, stepping on the thwarts towards me, when he came up and struck[Pg 50] at me, I clapped my hand under his thighs, and rising, pitched him head foremost into the river. I knew he was a good swimmer, and so was under little concern about him; but, before he could get round to lay hold of the boat, we had, with a few strokes, pulled her out of his reach; and whenever he drew near the boat, we asked him if he would row, striking a few strokes to slide her away from him. He was ready to stifle with vexation, and obstinately would not promise to row. Finding him at last beginning to tire, we drew him into the boat, and brought him home dripping wet. We hardly exchanged a civil word after this adventure. At length a West India captain, who had a commission to procure a preceptor for the sons of a gentleman at Barbadoes, met with him, and proposed to carry him thither to fill that situation. He accepted, and promised to remit me what he owed me out of the first money he should receive; but I never heard of him after. The violation of my trust respecting Vernon's money was one of the first great errata of my life; and this showed that my father was not much out in his judgment when he considered me as too young to manage business. But Sir William, on reading his letter, said he was too prudent; that there was a great difference in persons; and discretion did hot always accompany years, nor was youth always without it. "But, since he will not set you up, I will do it myself. Give me an inventory of the things necessary to be had from England, and I will send for them. You shall repay me when you are able; I am resolved to have a good printer here, and I am sure you must succeed." This was spoken with such an appearance of cordiality, that I had not the least doubt of his meaning what he said. I had hitherto kept the proposition of my setting up a secret in Philadelphia, and I still kept it. Had it been known that I depended on the governor, probably some friend that knew him better would have[Pg 51] advised me not to rely on him; as I afterward heard it as his known character, to be liberal of promises which he never meant to keep; yet, unsolicited as he was by me, how could I think his generous offers insincere? I believed him one of the best men in the world.

At New York, I found my friend Collins, who had gotten there before me. We had been close since childhood and had read the same books together, but he had more time for reading and studying and a remarkable talent for math, which I could never match. While I was in Boston, I spent most of my free time chatting with him. He was a serious and hardworking guy, well-respected by many clergymen and other gentlemen, and seemed destined to succeed in life. However, during my absence, he developed a drinking problem and, according to both him and others, he had been drunk every day since arriving in New York and acted quite erratically. He had also gambled and lost his money, which forced me to cover his accommodations and travel expenses on the[Pg 49] road and in Philadelphia, which was a heavy burden for me. The then governor of New York, Burnet (son of Bishop Burnet), heard from the captain that one of the passengers had a lot of books on board and asked to meet me. I went to see him and would have brought Collins if he had been sober. The governor welcomed me warmly, showed me his impressive library, and we had a good conversation about books and authors. This was the second governor who had recognized me, and for a poor boy like me, it was quite gratifying. We continued on to Philadelphia. I received Vernon's money along the way, without which we could hardly have completed our journey. Collins wanted to work in some counting house, but whether they sensed his drinking problem by his breath or his behavior, he had some recommendations but failed to gain any success with his applications and continued to stay in the same house as me, at my expense. Knowing I had that money from Vernon, he kept borrowing from me, always promising to pay me back as soon as he was working. Eventually, he borrowed so much that I worried about how I would manage if I was asked to send it back. His drinking persisted, which led to some arguments between us, because when he was a bit drunk, he became very irritable. Once, on a boat in the Delaware with some other young men, he refused to row when it was his turn: "I will be rowed home," he said. "We're not rowing you," I replied. "You must," he insisted, "or stay out on the water all night, it's up to you." The others suggested, "Let’s just row, what does it matter?" But I was already frustrated with his behavior and continued to refuse. So he swore he would force me to row or throw me overboard; as he stepped toward me on the benches, when he got close and struck at me, I lifted him up by his thighs and tossed him headfirst into the river. I knew he was a good swimmer, so I wasn't too worried about him; but before he could grab onto the boat, we had quickly pulled it out of his reach. Whenever he got close, we asked if he would row, paddling a bit to keep the boat away from him. He was furious, but stubbornly refused to agree to row. Finally, as he began to tire, we pulled him into the boat and brought him back home soaked. We hardly exchanged a polite word after that incident. Eventually, a West Indies captain, who had a mission to find a tutor for the sons of a gentleman in Barbados, met Collins and offered to take him there for that position. He accepted, promising to send me what he owed from the first money he received, but I never heard from him after that. Breaking my trust regarding Vernon's money was one of the first significant mistakes of my life, and it showed my father was probably right when he felt I was too young to manage business. However, Sir William, after reading his letter, said Collins was too cautious, that people are different, and wisdom doesn't always come with age, just as youth can still have it. "But since he won't support you, I will do it myself. Give me a list of what you need from England, and I'll order it. You can pay me back when you are able; I'm determined to get a good printer here, and I'm sure you'll succeed." He spoke with such confidence that I believed he genuinely meant what he said. Until then, I kept my plans of starting my own business a secret in Philadelphia, and I continued to do so. If it had been known that I depended on the governor, someone who knew him better might have advised me not to trust him; I later found out it was his reputation to make promises he didn't intend to keep. Yet, how could I think his generous offers were insincere when he approached me without me asking? I truly believed he was one of the best men around.

I presented him an inventory of a little printing-house, amounting by my computation to about one hundred pounds sterling. He liked it, but asked me if my being on the spot in England to choose the types, and see that everything was good of the kind, might not be of some advantage; "then," said he, "when there, you may make acquaintance, and establish correspondences in the bookselling and stationary way." I agreed that this might be advantageous. "Then," said he, "get yourself ready to go with the Annis;" which was the annual ship, and the only one at that time usually passing between London and Philadelphia. But as it would be some months before the Annis sailed, I continued working with Keimer, fretting extremely about the money Collins had got from me, and in great apprehensions of being called upon for it by Vernon; this, however, did not happen for some years after.

I gave him a list of items from a small printing shop, which I estimated to be worth about a hundred pounds sterling. He liked it but asked if it would be beneficial for me to be in England to choose the types and ensure everything was good quality. "Then," he said, "while you're there, you can meet people and build connections in the bookselling and stationery business." I agreed that this could be helpful. "So," he said, "get ready to go with the Annis," which was the annual ship and the only one at that time regularly traveling between London and Philadelphia. However, since it would be a few months before the Annis set sail, I kept working with Keimer, stressing a lot about the money Collins had taken from me, and I was very worried that Vernon would ask me for it; fortunately, that didn't happen for several years.

I believe I have omitted mentioning that, in my first voyage from Boston to Philadelphia, being becalmed off Block Island, our crew employed themselves in catching cod, and hauled up a great number. Till then I had stuck to my resolution to eat nothing that had had life; and on this occasion I considered, according to my master Tryon, the taking every fish as a kind of unprovoked murder, since none of them had nor could do us any injury that might justify this massacre. All this seemed very reasonable. But I had been formerly a great lover of fish, and when it came out of the frying-pan it smelled admirably well. I balanced some time between principle and inclination, till, recollecting that when fish were opened I saw smaller[Pg 52] fish taken out of their stomachs; then, thought I, "if you eat one another, I don't see why we may not eat you." So I dined upon cod very heartily, and have since continued to eat as other people; returning only now and then occasionally to a vegetable diet. So convenient a thing it is to be a reasonable creature, since it enables one to find or make a reason for everything one has a mind to do.

I realize I forgot to mention that during my first trip from Boston to Philadelphia, while we were stuck off Block Island, our crew passed the time catching cod, and we pulled up a huge amount. Until that point, I had stuck to my decision not to eat anything that was once alive; and in that moment, I thought, based on my master Tryon’s teachings, that catching any fish felt like an act of unprovoked murder, since none of them had harmed us or could justify this slaughter. It all seemed very reasonable. But I used to really love fish, and the smell of it coming out of the frying pan was amazing. I struggled for a while between sticking to my principles and my cravings until I remembered that when fish were cleaned, I could see smaller fish pulled from their stomachs. Then I thought, "If they eat each other, I don't see why we can't eat you." So I enjoyed a hearty cod dinner and since then, I’ve eaten like everyone else, only occasionally going back to a vegetarian diet. It's so convenient to be a reasonable creature, as it allows you to find or create a reason for anything you want to do.

Keimer and I lived on a pretty good, familiar footing, and agreed tolerably well; for he suspected nothing of my setting up. He retained a great deal of his old enthusiasm, and loved argumentation. We therefore had many disputations. I used to work him so with my Socratic method, and had trepanned him so often by questions apparently so distant from any point we had in hand, yet by degrees leading to the point, and bringing him into difficulties and contradictions, that at last he grew ridiculously cautious, and would hardly answer me the most common questions, without asking first "What do you intend to infer from that?" However, it gave him so high an opinion of my abilities in the confuting way, that he seriously proposed my being his colleague in a project he had of setting up a new sect. He was to preach the doctrines, and I was to confound all opponents. When he came to explain with me upon the doctrines, I found several conundrums which I objected to, unless I might have my way a little too, and introduce some of mine. Keimer wore his beard at full length, because somewhere in the Mosaic law it is said, "Thou shalt not mar the corners of thy beard." He likewise kept the seventh-day Sabbath; and these two points were essential with him. I disliked both; but agreed to them on condition of his adopting the doctrine of not using animal food. I doubt, said he, my constitution will not bear it. I assured him it would, and that he would be the better for it. He was usually a great eater, and I wished to give[Pg 53] myself some diversion in half starving him. He consented to try the practice if I would keep him company: I did so, and we held it for three months. Our provisions were purchased, cooked, and brought to us regularly by a woman in the neighbourhood, who had from me a list of forty dishes, which she prepared for us at different times, in which there entered neither fish, flesh, nor fowl. This whim suited me the better at this time, from the cheapness of it, not costing us above eighteen pence sterling each per week. I have since kept several Lents most strictly, leaving the common diet for that, and that for the common, abruptly, without the least inconvenience. So that I think there is little in the advice of making those changes by easy gradations. I went on pleasantly, but poor Keimer suffered grievously, grew tired of the project, longed for the fleshpots of Egypt, and ordered a roast pig. He invited me and two women friends to dine with him; but it being brought too soon upon table, he could not resist the temptation, and ate the whole before we came.

Keimer and I got along pretty well and had decent agreements, since he had no idea I was planning my own setup. He still had a lot of his old enthusiasm and enjoyed arguing, so we had plenty of debates. I used my Socratic method on him a lot, often leading him into tricky situations with questions that seemed unrelated but eventually brought us back to the main topic. Eventually, he became overly cautious and would barely answer my simplest questions without first asking, "What do you intend to infer from that?" However, this gave him such a high opinion of my debating skills that he seriously suggested I join him as a partner in his idea of starting a new sect. He would preach the doctrines, and I would handle the arguments against any critics. When we discussed the doctrines, I found some issues I wanted to challenge unless I could also include some of my own ideas. Keimer kept his beard long because there's a part of the Mosaic law that says, "Thou shalt not mar the corners of thy beard." He also observed the Sabbath on the seventh day, and these two points were really important to him. I didn’t like either of them but agreed to go along with them if he would accept the idea of not eating animal products. He doubted that his body could handle it. I assured him it could and that he would feel better for it. He usually ate quite a lot, and I thought it would be fun to kind of starve him a little. He agreed to try it if I would join him, and I did, so we kept it up for three months. A woman from the neighborhood bought, cooked, and brought us our food regularly based on a list of forty dishes I gave her, none of which included meat, fish, or poultry. I liked this idea, especially since it was cheap, costing us only about eighteen pence each per week. I've since done several strict periods of fasting, switching from regular food to that with no trouble at all. So I think the idea of making those changes gradually is overrated. I enjoyed it, but poor Keimer suffered a lot, grew tired of the plan, craved the rich food he missed, and ordered a roast pig. He invited me and two female friends to dinner, but it was served too early, and he couldn't resist the temptation and ate the entire thing before we arrived.

I had made some courtship during this time to Miss Read; I had a great respect and affection for her, and had some reasons to believe she had the same for me; but as I was about to take a long voyage, and we were both very young (only a little above eighteen), it was thought most prudent by her mother to prevent our going too far at present; as a marriage, if it was to take place, would be more convenient after my return, when I should be, as I hoped, set up in my business. Perhaps, too, she thought my expectations not so well founded as I imagined them to be.

I had been trying to win over Miss Read during this time; I had a lot of respect and affection for her, and I had some reasons to think she felt the same about me. But since I was about to go on a long voyage and we were both very young (just a little over eighteen), her mother thought it was best to keep things from getting too serious right now. A marriage, if it were to happen, would be more practical after I returned, when I hoped to be established in my career. Maybe she also thought my expectations weren’t as solid as I believed they were.

My chief acquaintances at this time were Charles Osborne, Joseph Watson, and James Ralph; all lovers of reading. The first two were clerks to an eminent scrivener or conveyancer in the town (Charles Brockden), the other was a clerk to a merchant.[Pg 54] Watson was a pious, sensible young man of great integrity: the others rather more lax in their principles of religion, particularly Ralph, who, as well as Collins, had been unsettled by me, for which they both made me suffer. Osborne was sensible, candid, frank, sincere, and affectionate to his friends; but in literary matters too fond of criticism. Ralph was ingenuous, genteel in his manners, and extremely eloquent; I think I never knew a prettier talker. Both were great admirers of poetry, and began to try their hands in little pieces. Many pleasant walks we have had together on Sundays in the woods on the banks of the Schuylkill, where we read to one another, and conferred on what we had read. Ralph was inclined to give himself up entirely to poetry, not doubting but he might make great proficiency in it, and even make his fortune by it. He pretended that the greatest poets must, when they first began to write, have committed as many faults as he did. Osborne endeavoured to dissuade him, assured him he had no genius for poetry, and advised him to think of nothing beyond the business he was bred to; "that in the mercantile way, though he had no stock, he might, by his diligence and punctuality, recommend himself to employment as a factor, and in time acquire wherewith to trade on his own account." I approved, for my part, the amusing one's self with poetry now and then, so far as to improve one's language, but no farther. On this it was proposed that we should each of us, at our next meeting, produce a piece of our own composing, in order to improve by our mutual observations, criticisms, and corrections. As language and expression was what we had in view, we excluded all considerations of invention, by agreeing that the task should be a version of the eighteenth Psalm, which describes the descent of a deity. When the time of our meeting drew nigh, Ralph called on me first,[Pg 55] and let me know his piece was ready: I told him I had been busy, and, having little inclination, had done nothing. He then showed me his piece for my opinion, and I much approved it, as it appeared to me to have great merit. "Now," said he, "Osborne never will allow the least merit in anything of mine, but makes a thousand criticisms out of mere envy: he is not so jealous of you; I wish, therefore, you would take this piece and produce it as yours: I will pretend not to have had time, and so produce nothing; we shall then hear what he will say to it." It was agreed, and I immediately transcribed it, that it might appear in my own hand. We met: Watson's performance was read; there were some beauties in it, but many defects. Osborne's was read; it was much better. Ralph did it justice, remarked some faults, but applauded the beauties. He himself had nothing to produce. I was backward, seemed desirous of being excused, had not had sufficient time to correct, &c., but no excuse could be admitted; produce I must. It was read and repeated: Watson and Osborne gave up the contest, and joined in applauding it. Ralph only made some criticisms and proposed some amendments; but I defended my text. Osborne was severe against Ralph, and told me he was no better able to criticise than to compose verses. As these two were returning home, Osborne expressed himself still more strongly in favour of what he thought my production; having before refrained, as he said, lest I should think he meant to flatter me. "But who would have imagined," said he, "that Franklin was capable of such a performance; such painting, such force, such fire! He has even improved on the original. In common conversation he seems to have no choice of words; he hesitates and blunders; and yet, good God, how he writes!" When we next met, Ralph discovered the trick we had played, and Osborne was laughed at. This[Pg 56] transaction fixed Ralph in his resolution of becoming a poet. I did all I could to dissuade him from it, but he continued scribbling verses till Pope cured him.[6] He became, however, a pretty good prose writer. More of him hereafter. But as I may not have occasion to mention the other two, I shall just remark here that Watson died in my arms a few years after, much lamented, being the best of our set. Osborne went to the West Indies, where he became an eminent lawyer, and made money. He and I had made a serious agreement, that the one who happened first to die should, if possible, make a friendly visit to the other, and acquaint him how he found things in that separate state. But he never fulfilled his promise.

My main friends at the time were Charles Osborne, Joseph Watson, and James Ralph; all of them loved to read. The first two worked as clerks for a well-known scrivener in town (Charles Brockden), while the other was a clerk for a merchant.[Pg 54] Watson was a devout, sensible young man with great integrity; the others were a bit more relaxed about their religious principles, especially Ralph, who, along with Collins, had been influenced by me, and they both made me pay for it. Osborne was sensible, honest, straightforward, sincere, and caring towards his friends; but he was a bit too critical when it came to literature. Ralph was open, well-mannered, and extremely eloquent; I don't think I ever met anyone who could talk as beautifully as he could. Both were huge fans of poetry and started trying their hands at writing short pieces. We had many enjoyable walks together on Sundays in the woods by the Schuylkill River, where we read to each other and discussed what we had read. Ralph wanted to fully dedicate himself to poetry, confident that he could excel in it and even make a living from it. He claimed that even the greatest poets must have made as many mistakes when they first started writing as he did. Osborne tried to talk him out of it, assuring him he had no talent for poetry, and advised him to focus on the career he was trained for; “that in the business world, even without capital, he could, through hard work and reliability, make a name for himself as a factor, and eventually save enough to start his own trade.” I, for my part, thought it was fine to dabble in poetry occasionally to improve one's language, but nothing beyond that. So, it was suggested that at our next meeting, each of us would bring a piece of our own work to improve through mutual feedback and corrections. Since our focus was on language and expression, we agreed to set aside any concerns about originality and make it a version of the eighteenth Psalm, which talks about the descent of a deity. As our meeting approached, Ralph visited me first,[Pg 55] and told me his piece was ready. I explained that I had been busy and, lacking motivation, hadn’t done anything. He then showed me his piece for my opinion, and I was quite impressed with it, as it seemed to have significant merit. "Now," he said, "Osborne will never acknowledge any merit in my work and will come up with a thousand criticisms just out of jealousy: he’s not as critical of you; so I wish you would present this piece as if it were yours. I’ll pretend I didn’t have time and won’t bring anything; we’ll see what he says about it." We agreed, and I immediately copied it out in my own handwriting. When we met, Watson's piece was read; it had some beautiful moments, but also many flaws. Osborne’s piece was read next; it was much better. Ralph did it justice, pointed out some mistakes, but praised the beauties. He himself had nothing to share. I was hesitant, seemed eager to excuse myself, claiming I hadn’t had enough time to revise, etc., but no excuse was allowed; I had to present it. It was read and discussed: Watson and Osborne conceded the contest and joined in praising it. Ralph only made some critiques and suggested improvements; but I defended my work. Osborne was harsh on Ralph, saying he wasn’t any better at criticizing than he was at writing verses. As they were heading home, Osborne expressed himself even more strongly in favor of what he thought was my work; he had previously held back, thinking I might think he was flattering me. "But who would have thought," he said, "that Franklin was capable of such a piece; such imagery, such strength, such passion! He has even improved on the original. In casual conversation, he seems to struggle with word choice; he hesitates and stumbles; and yet, good grief, how he writes!" When we met again, Ralph revealed the trick we had played, and Osborne became the butt of the joke. This[Pg 56] incident solidified Ralph’s determination to become a poet. I did everything I could to dissuade him, but he kept scribbling verses until Pope set him straight.[6] He did, however, become a pretty decent prose writer. More about him later. But since I might not mention the other two again, I’ll just note here that Watson died in my arms a few years later, greatly mourned, as he was the best of our group. Osborne went to the West Indies, where he became a successful lawyer and made a fortune. He and I had made a serious pact that whoever died first would try, if possible, to visit the other in the afterlife and let him know how things are there. But he never kept his promise.

The governor, seeming to like my company, had me frequently at his house, and his setting me up was always mentioned as a fixed thing. I was to take with me letters recommendatory to a number of his friends, besides the letter of credit to furnish me with the necessary money for purchasing the press, types, paper, &c. For these letters I was appointed to call at different times, when they were to be ready, but a future time was still named. Thus we went on till the ship (whose departure, too, had been several times postponed) was on the point of sailing. Then, when I called to take my leave and receive the letters, his secretary, Dr. Baird, came out to me and said the governor was extremely busy in writing, but would be down at Newcastle before the ship, and then the letters would be delivered to me.

The governor, who seemed to enjoy my company, often invited me to his home, and it was always mentioned that he was going to set me up. I was supposed to take letters of recommendation to several of his friends, along with a letter of credit to provide me with the funds I needed to buy the press, types, paper, etc. I was scheduled to pick up these letters at different times when they would be ready, but a later date was always given. We kept this up until the ship (which had already been delayed several times) was about to sail. Then, when I stopped by to say my goodbyes and collect the letters, his secretary, Dr. Baird, came out to me and said the governor was really busy writing, but would be down at Newcastle before the ship left, and then the letters would be handed to me.

Ralph, though married, and having one child, had determined to accompany me in this voyage. It was thought he intended to establish a correspondence and obtain goods to sell on commission; but I[Pg 57] found after, that, having some cause of discontent with his wife's relations, he proposed to leave her on their hands and never return to America. Having taken leave of my friends and exchanged promises with Miss Read, I quitted Philadelphia in the ship, which anchored at Newcastle. The governor was there, but when I went to his lodging, his secretary came to me from him with expressions of the greatest regret that he could not then see me, being engaged in business of importance; but that he would send the letters to me on board, wishing me heartily a good voyage and a speedy return, &c. I returned on board a little puzzled, but still not doubting.

Ralph, even though he was married and had a child, decided to join me on this trip. People thought he wanted to set up a correspondence and get goods to sell on commission; however, I[Pg 57] later discovered that he was unhappy with his wife's family and planned to leave her behind and never come back to America. After saying goodbye to my friends and making promises to Miss Read, I left Philadelphia on the ship, which docked at Newcastle. The governor was there, but when I went to his place, his secretary told me he was very sorry he couldn't meet with me because he was busy with important matters. However, he would send the letters to me on board and wished me a safe journey and a quick return, etc. I went back on board a bit confused, but still trusting.

Mr. Andrew Hamilton, a celebrated lawyer of Philadelphia, had taken his passage in the same ship for himself and son, with Mr. Denham, a Quaker merchant, and Messrs. Oniam and Russel (masters of an iron work in Maryland), who had engaged the great cabin; so that Ralph and I were forced to take up with a birth in the steerage, and, none on board knowing us, were considered as ordinary persons. But Mr. Hamilton and his son (it was James, since governor) returned from Newcastle to Philadelphia, the father being recalled by a great fee to plead for a seized ship. And just before we sailed, Colonel French coming on board, and showing me great respect, I was more taken notice of; and, with my friend Ralph, invited by the other gentlemen to come into the cabin, there being now room; accordingly, we removed thither.

Mr. Andrew Hamilton, a well-known lawyer from Philadelphia, had booked tickets on the same ship for himself and his son, along with Mr. Denham, a Quaker merchant, and Messrs. Oniam and Russel (owners of an ironworks in Maryland), who had reserved the main cabin. This meant that Ralph and I had to settle for a spot in the steerage and, since no one on board knew us, we were seen as just regular passengers. However, Mr. Hamilton and his son (who was James, later the governor) returned from Newcastle to Philadelphia because the father was called back for a significant fee to represent a seized ship. Right before we set sail, Colonel French came on board and showed me a lot of respect, which got me more attention. Along with my friend Ralph, we were invited by the other gentlemen to move into the cabin, as there was now space available; so we made the change.

Understanding that Colonel French had brought on board the governor's despatches, I asked the captain for those letters that were to be under my care; he said all were put into the bag together, and he could not then come at them, but before we landed in England I should have an opportunity of picking them out; so I was satisfied for the present, and we proceeded on our voyage. We had a sociable[Pg 58] company in the cabin, and lived uncommonly well, having the addition of all Mr. Hamilton's stores, who had laid in plentifully. In this passage Mr. Denham contracted a friendship for me, that continued during his life. The voyage was otherwise not a pleasant one, as we had a great deal of bad weather.

Understanding that Colonel French had brought the governor's dispatches on board, I asked the captain for the letters that were supposed to be under my care. He said all of them were put into the bag together, and he couldn't get to them at the moment, but before we landed in England, I would have a chance to pick them out; so I was content for now, and we continued on our journey. We had a friendly group in the cabin and lived quite well, thanks to Mr. Hamilton's ample supplies. During this trip, Mr. Denham and I formed a friendship that lasted his whole life. However, the voyage itself wasn't very enjoyable because we faced a lot of bad weather.

When we came into the Channel, the captain kept his word with me, and gave me an opportunity of examining the bag for the governor's letters; I found some upon which my name was put, as under my care: I picked out six or seven, that by the handwriting I thought might be the promised letters, especially as one of them was addressed to Basket, the king's printer, and another to some stationer. We arrived in London the 24th December, 1724. I waited upon the stationer, who came first in my way, delivering the letter as from Governor Keith. "I don't know such a person," said he: but opening the letter, "Oh! this is from Riddlesden. I have lately found him to be a complete rascal, and I will have nothing to do with him, nor receive any letters from him." So, putting the letter into my hand, he turned on his heel and left me to serve some customer. I was surprised to find these were not the governor's letters; and, after recollecting and comparing circumstances, I began to doubt his sincerity. I found my friend Denham, and opened the whole affair to him. He let me into Keith's character; told me there was not the least probability that he had written any letters for me; that no one who knew him had the smallest dependance on him; and he laughed at the idea of the governor's giving me a letter of credit, having, as he said, no credit to give. On my expressing some concern about what I should do, he advised me to endeavour to get some employment in the way of my business. Among the printers here, said he, you will improve yourself, and when you return to America you will set up to greater advantage.[Pg 59]

When we entered the Channel, the captain kept his promise to me and allowed me to check the bag for the governor's letters. I found a few addressed to me, and I picked out six or seven that I thought might be the promised letters because one was addressed to Basket, the king's printer, and another to a stationer. We arrived in London on December 24, 1724. I went to the stationer who was first on my path and handed him the letter from Governor Keith. "I don't know that person," he replied, but upon opening the letter, he said, "Oh! This is from Riddlesden. I've recently discovered he’s a complete rascal, and I want nothing to do with him or his letters." He handed the letter back to me, turned away, and went to serve another customer. I was surprised to learn these weren't the governor's letters, and as I thought it over and compared things, I started to doubt his honesty. I found my friend Denham and explained everything to him. He shared insights about Keith's character, saying there was no chance he had written any letters for me; no one who knew him had any trust in him, and he laughed at the idea of the governor providing me a letter of credit since, as he put it, Keith had no credit to offer. When I expressed concern about what to do next, he suggested I try to find some work related to my field. "Among the printers here," he said, "you’ll gain experience, and when you return to America, you’ll be in a better position to succeed."[Pg 59]

We both of us happened to know, as well as the stationer, that Riddlesden, the attorney, was a very knave; he had half ruined Miss Read's father, by persuading him to be bound for him. By his letter it appeared there was a secret scheme on foot to the prejudice of Mr. Hamilton (supposed to be then coming over with us); that Keith was concerned in it, with Riddlesden. Denham, who was a friend of Hamilton's, thought he ought to be acquainted with it; so, when he arrived in England, which was soon after, partly from resentment and ill will to Keith and Riddlesden, and partly from good will to him, I waited on him and gave him the letter. He thanked me cordially, the information being of importance to him; and from that time he became my friend, greatly to my advantage afterward on many occasions.

We both knew, just like the stationer, that Riddlesden, the lawyer, was a real crook; he had almost ruined Miss Read's father by convincing him to back him financially. From his letter, it was clear there was a secret plan in the works that could harm Mr. Hamilton (who was expected to be coming over with us); that Keith was involved in it, along with Riddlesden. Denham, a friend of Hamilton's, felt he should be informed, so when he arrived in England shortly after, feeling a mix of anger and resentment towards Keith and Riddlesden, as well as good will towards Hamilton, I went to see him and shared the letter. He thanked me sincerely, as the information was crucial for him; from that moment on, he became my friend, which ended up benefiting me greatly on many occasions later.

But what shall we think of a governor playing such pitiful tricks, and imposing so grossly upon a poor ignorant boy! It was a habit he had acquired; he wished to please everybody, and having little to give, he gave expectations. He was otherwise an ingenious, sensible man, a pretty good writer, and a good governor for the people, though not for his constituents the proprietaries, whose instructions he sometimes disregarded: several of our best laws were of his planning, and passed during his administration.

But what should we think of a governor pulling such pathetic stunts and deceiving a poor, clueless boy? It was a habit he had picked up; he wanted to please everyone, and with little to offer, he gave them false hopes. He was otherwise a clever, sensible man, a decent writer, and a good governor for the people, even if not for his constituents, the proprietors, whose orders he sometimes ignored: several of our best laws were his ideas and were passed during his time in office.

Ralph and I were inseparable companions. We took lodgings together in Little Britain, at 3s. 6d. per week; as much as we could then afford. He found some relations, but they were poor, and unable to assist him. He now let me know his intentions of remaining in London, and that he never meant to return to Philadelphia. He had brought no money with him, the whole he could muster having been expended in paying his passage. I had fifteen pistoles; so he borrowed occasionally of me to subsist, while he was looking out for business. He first endeavoured to get into the playhouse, believing[Pg 60] himself qualified for an actor; but Wilkes to whom he applied, advised him candidly not to think of that employment, as it was impossible he should succeed in it. Then he proposed to Roberts, a publisher in Paternoster Row, to write for him a weekly paper like the Spectator, on certain conditions; which Roberts did not approve. Then he endeavoured to get employment as a hackney-writer, to copy for the stationers and lawyers about the Temple; but could not find a vacancy.

Ralph and I were inseparable friends. We shared a place in Little Britain, costing 3s. 6d. a week, which was all we could afford at the time. He found some relatives, but they were poor and not able to help him. He let me know that he planned to stay in London for good and had no intention of going back to Philadelphia. He had no money with him, as he had spent everything he had on his passage. I had fifteen pistoles, so he occasionally borrowed from me to get by while he looked for work. He first tried to get into the theater, thinking he was qualified to be an actor, but Wilkes, to whom he reached out, honestly told him not to pursue that line of work, as he was unlikely to succeed. Then he offered to write a weekly paper for Roberts, a publisher on Paternoster Row, similar to the Spectator, but Roberts didn’t approve of that. Afterward, he sought work as a hack writer, copying for the stationers and lawyers around the Temple, but couldn't find any openings.

For myself, I immediately got into work at Palmer's, a famous printing-house in Bartholomew Close, where I continued near a year. I was pretty diligent, but I spent with Ralph a good deal of my earnings, at plays and public amusements; we had nearly consumed all my pistoles, and now just rubbed on from hand to mouth. He seemed quite to have forgotten his wife and child; and I, by degrees, my engagements with Miss Read, to whom I never wrote more than one letter, and that was to let her know I was not likely soon to return. This was another of the great errata of my life which I could wish to correct if I were to live it over again In fact, by our expenses I was constantly kept unable to pay my passage.

For me, I quickly started working at Palmer's, a well-known printing house in Bartholomew Close, where I stayed for almost a year. I was fairly hardworking, but I spent a lot of my earnings with Ralph on plays and other entertainment; we had nearly used up all my money, and now we were just getting by. He seemed to have completely forgotten about his wife and child; and I slowly started to forget my commitments to Miss Read, to whom I only wrote one letter, letting her know I wasn't likely to come back anytime soon. This was another major mistake in my life that I would want to fix if I could live it over again. In fact, because of our spending, I was always unable to afford my passage.

At Palmer's I was employed in composing for the second edition of Woollaston's Religion of Nature. Some of his reasonings not appearing to me well-founded, I wrote a little metaphysical piece, in which I made remarks on them. It was entitled, "A Dissertation on Liberty and Necessity, Pleasure and Pain." I inscribed it to my friend Ralph; I printed a small number. It occasioned my being more considered by Mr. Palmer as a young man of some ingenuity, though he seriously expostulated with me upon the principles of my pamphlet, which to him appeared abominable. My printing this pamphlet was another erratum. While I lodged in Little Britain, I made acquaintance with one Wilcox, a bookseller,[Pg 61] whose shop was next door. He had an immense collection of second-hand books. Circulating libraries were not then in use, but we agreed that on certain reasonable terms (which I have now forgotten), I might take, read, and return any of his books; this I esteemed a great advantage, and I made as much use of it as I could.

At Palmer's, I worked on the second edition of Woollaston's "Religion of Nature." Since some of his arguments didn't seem well-founded to me, I wrote a short metaphysical piece with my comments on them. It was titled, "A Dissertation on Liberty and Necessity, Pleasure and Pain." I dedicated it to my friend Ralph and printed a small number of copies. This led Mr. Palmer to see me as a young man with some talent, although he seriously criticized the principles in my pamphlet, which he found appalling. Printing this pamphlet was another mistake. While I was staying in Little Britain, I got to know a bookseller named Wilcox, whose shop was next door. He had a huge collection of second-hand books. Circulating libraries weren't around at that time, but we agreed that under certain reasonable terms (which I've now forgotten), I could take, read, and return any of his books. I saw this as a great opportunity and made the most of it.

My pamphlet by some means falling into the hands of one Lyons, a surgeon, author of a book entitled "The Infallibility of Human Judgment," it occasioned an acquaintance between us; he took great notice of me, called on me often to converse on those subjects, carried me to the Horns, a pale alehouse in —— lane, Cheapside, and introduced me to Dr. Mandeville, author of the Fable of the Bees, who had a club there, of which he was the soul, being a most facetious, entertaining companion. Lyons, too, introduced me to Dr. Pemberton,[7] at Baston's Coffee-house, who promised to give me an opportunity, some time or other, of seeing Sir Isaac Newton, of which I was extremely desirous; but this never happened.

My pamphlet somehow ended up in the hands of a surgeon named Lyons, who wrote a book called "The Infallibility of Human Judgment." This led to us getting to know each other; he paid a lot of attention to me and often came by to discuss various topics. He took me to the Horns, a pale alehouse on —— lane, Cheapside, and introduced me to Dr. Mandeville, the author of the Fable of the Bees, who had a club there and was a lively, entertaining companion. Lyons also introduced me to Dr. Pemberton,[7] at Baston's Coffee-house, who promised to arrange for me to meet Sir Isaac Newton at some point, which I was very eager about; however, that never happened.

I had brought over a few curiosities, among which the principal was a purse made of the asbestos, which purifies by fire. Sir Hans Sloane heard of it, came to see me, invited me to his house in Bloomsbury Square, showed me all his curiosities, and persuaded me to add that to the number; for which he paid me handsomely.

I had brought over a few interesting items, the main one being a purse made of asbestos, which cleanses through fire. Sir Hans Sloane heard about it, visited me, invited me to his place in Bloomsbury Square, showed me all his collectibles, and convinced me to add that to his collection; he paid me well for it.

At my first admission into the printing-house I took to working at press, imagining I felt a want of the bodily exercise I had been used to in America, where presswork is mixed with the composing. I drank only water; the other workmen, near fifty in number, were great drinkers of beer. On occasion, I carried up and down stairs a large form of types in each hand, when others carried but one in both[Pg 62] hands; they wondered to see, from this and several instances, that the Water American, as they called me, was stronger than themselves who drank strong beer! We had an alehouse-boy, who attended always in the house to supply the workmen. My companion at the press drank every day a pint before breakfast, a pint at breakfast with his bread and cheese, a pint between breakfast and dinner, a pint at dinner; a pint in the afternoon about six o'clock, and another when he had done his day's work. I thought it a detestable custom; but it was necessary, he supposed, to drink strong beer, that he might be strong to labour. I endeavoured to convince him that the bodily strength afforded by beer could only be in proportion to the grain or flour of the barley dissolved in the water of which it was made; that there was more flour in a pennyworth of bread, and, therefore, if he could eat that with a pint of water, it would give him more strength than a quart of beer. He drank on, however, and had four or five shillings to pay out of his wages every Saturday night for that vile liquor: an expense I was free from; and thus these poor devils keep themselves always under.

When I first started working at the printing house, I began working at the press, thinking I needed the physical activity I was used to in America, where press work is combined with composing. I only drank water; the other workers, almost fifty of them, were big beer drinkers. Sometimes, I carried a large form of type up and down the stairs with one in each hand, while others struggled to carry just one in both hands. They were surprised to see that the “Water American,” as they called me, was stronger than they were, despite their drinking “strong” beer! We had a bar boy who was always around to serve the workers. My press buddy drank a pint of beer before breakfast, a pint with his breakfast of bread and cheese, a pint between breakfast and lunch, a pint at lunch, another pint in the afternoon around six, and one more after finishing his day’s work. I thought this was a terrible habit, but he believed he needed to drink “strong” beer to have the strength to work. I tried to persuade him that any strength he got from beer was only in relation to the grain or flour of the barley dissolved in the water it was made from; that there was more flour in a penny's worth of bread, and if he ate that with a pint of water, it would give him more strength than a quart of beer. He just kept on drinking and ended up spending four or five shillings from his wages every Saturday night for that awful stuff—a cost I didn’t have to worry about. And so, these poor guys kept themselves down.

Watts, after some weeks, desiring to have me in the composing-room, I left the pressmen; a new bien venu for drink (being five shillings) was demanded of me by the compositors. I thought it an imposition, as I had paid one to the pressmen; the master thought so too, and forbade my paying it. I stood out two or three weeks, was accordingly considered as an excommunicate, and had so many little pieces of private malice practised on me, by mixing my sorts, transposing and breaking my matter, &c., &c., if ever I stepped out of the room, and all ascribed to the chapel ghost, which they said ever haunted those not regularly admitted, that, notwithstanding the master's protection, I found myself obliged to comply and pay the money, convinced of the folly of being on ill terms with those one is to live[Pg 63] with continually. I was now on a fair footing with them, and soon acquired considerable influence. I proposed some reasonable alterations in their chapel[8] laws, and carried them against all opposition. From my example a great many of them left their muddling breakfast of beer, bread and cheese, finding they could with me be supplied from a neighbouring house with a large porringer of hot water-gruel, sprinkled with pepper, crumbled with bread, and a bit of butter in it, for the price of a pint of beer, viz., three halfpence. This was a more comfortable as well as a cheaper breakfast, and kept their heads clearer. Those who continued sotting with their beer all day, were often, by not paying, out of credit at the alehouse, and used to make interest with me to get beer, their light, as they phrased it, being out. I watched the pay-table on Saturday night, and collected what I stood engaged for them, having to pay sometimes near thirty shillings a week on their accounts. This, and my being esteemed a pretty good rig-ite, that is, a jocular verbal satirist, supported my consequence in the society. My constant attendance (I never making a St. Monday) recommended me to the master; and my uncommon quickness at composing occasioned my being put upon work of despatch, which was generally better paid; so I went on now very agreeably.

Watts, after a few weeks, wanting me to join the composing room, I left the pressmen. The compositors demanded a new bien venu for drinks (costing five shillings) from me. I thought it was unfair since I had already paid one to the pressmen; the master agreed and told me not to pay it. I held out for two or three weeks and was considered an outcast, facing little acts of private malice against me, like mixing my types, rearranging and breaking my material, etc., whenever I stepped out of the room. They called it the chapel ghost, which supposedly bothered those not officially admitted. Despite the master’s protection, I realized it was foolish to be on bad terms with people I had to live with every day, so I ended up paying the fee. I was now on good terms with them and quickly gained significant influence. I suggested some reasonable changes to their chapel[8] laws and managed to get them approved despite opposition. Because of my example, many switched from their sloppy breakfasts of beer, bread, and cheese to a large bowl of hot water-gruel sprinkled with pepper, crumbled bread, and a bit of butter from a nearby house, for the same price as a pint of beer, which was three halfpence. This was a more comfortable and cheaper breakfast that kept their heads clear. Those who continued to drink beer all day often found themselves unable to get credit at the pub and would ask me for beer since their light, as they put it, was out. I kept an eye on the pay-table on Saturday night, collecting what I had promised to cover for them, which sometimes amounted to nearly thirty shillings a week. This, along with being seen as a pretty good rig-ite, or a witty satirist, helped maintain my status in the group. My regular attendance (I never took a St. Monday) impressed the master; my quickness at composing led to being assigned urgent work, which was generally better paid. So, I was getting along quite well.

My lodgings in Little Britain being too remote, I found another in Duke-street, opposite to the Romish Chapel. It was up three flights of stairs backward, at an Italian warehouse. A widow lady[Pg 64] kept the house; she had a daughter, and a maidservant, and a journeyman who attended the warehouse, but lodged abroad. After sending to inquire my character at the house where I last lodged, she agreed to take me in at the same rate, 3s. 6d. per week; cheaper, as she said, from the protection she expected in having a man to lodge in the house. She was a widow, an elderly woman; had been bred a Protestant, being a clergyman's daughter, but was converted to the Catholic religion by her husband, whose memory she much revered; had lived much among people of distinction, and knew a thousand anecdotes of them, as far back as Charles the Second. She was lame in her knees with the gout, and therefore seldom stirred out of her room, so she sometimes wanted company; and hers was so highly amusing to me, that I was sure to spend an evening with her whenever she desired it. Our supper was only half an anchovy each, on a very little slice of bread and butter, and half a pint of ale between us; but the entertainment was in her conversation. My always keeping good hours, and giving little trouble in the family, made her unwilling to part with me; so that, when I talked of a lodging I had heard of nearer my business, for 2s. a week, which, intent as I was on saving money, made some difference, she bid me not think of it, for she would abate me 2s. a week for the future; so I remained with her at 1s. 6d. as long as I stayed in London.

My place in Little Britain was too far away, so I found another one on Duke Street, right across from the Catholic Chapel. It was up three flights of stairs in an Italian warehouse. A widow[Pg 64] ran the house; she had a daughter, a maidservant, and a journeyman who worked in the warehouse but lived elsewhere. After checking my references from my previous place, she agreed to take me in for the same rate of 3s. 6d. per week; she said it was cheaper because she expected to have a man staying in the house for protection. She was a widow, an older woman; she had grown up as a Protestant, being the daughter of a clergyman, but converted to Catholicism through her husband, whose memory she held in high regard. She had spent a lot of time among people of higher social standing and knew countless stories about them, dating back to the time of Charles the Second. She suffered from gout, which left her lame in her knees, so she rarely left her room and sometimes wanted company; I found her conversation so entertaining that I was always happy to spend an evening with her. For supper, we had just half an anchovy each on a small slice of bread and butter and shared half a pint of ale, but the real enjoyment came from our talks. My habit of keeping reasonable hours and being low-maintenance made her reluctant to let me go; so when I mentioned a room I’d heard about closer to my work for 2s. a week, which was tempting given my goal of saving money, she told me not to consider it and offered to reduce my rent by 2s. a week. So, I stayed with her at 1s. 6d. for as long as I was in London.

In a garret of her house there lived a maiden lady of seventy, in the most retired manner, of whom my landlady gave me this account: that she was a Roman Catholic, had been sent abroad when young, and lodged in a nunnery with an intent of becoming a nun; but, the country not agreeing with her, she returned to England, where, there being no nunnery, she had vowed to lead the life of a nun as near as might be done in those circumstances. Accordingly, she had given all her estate to charitable[Pg 65] purposes, reserving only twelve pounds a year to live on, and out of this sum she still gave a part in charity, living herself on water-gruel only, and using no fire but to boil it. She had lived many years in that garret, being permitted to remain there gratis by successive Catholic tenants of the house below, as they deemed it a blessing to have her there. A priest visited her to confess her every day: "from this I asked her," said my landlady, "how she, as she lived, could possibly find so much employment for a confessor." "Oh," said she, "it is impossible to avoid vain thoughts." I was permitted once to visit her; she was cheerful and polite, and conversed pleasantly. The room was clean, but had no other furniture than a mattress, a table with a crucifix, and a book, a stool which she gave me to sit on, and a picture over the chimney of St. Veronica displaying her handkerchief, with the miraculous figure of Christ's bleeding face on it, which she explained to me with great seriousness. She looked pale, but was never sick, and I give it as another instance on how small an income life and health may be supported.

In a small attic of her house lived a 70-year-old single lady, very private, about whom my landlady told me this: she was a Roman Catholic, had been sent overseas when she was young, and stayed in a convent with the intention of becoming a nun. However, the country didn't agree with her, so she returned to England. Since there were no convents here, she vowed to live as closely to a nun's life as possible under the circumstances. She donated all her wealth to charity, keeping only twelve pounds a year to live on, and even from that, she gave some to charity, living solely on watered-down porridge and using fire only to boil it. She had lived many years in that attic, allowed to stay there for free by successive Catholic tenants of the house below, who considered it a blessing to have her there. A priest came to hear her confession every day. "From this," my landlady said, "I asked how she could possibly have so much for a confessor, considering her life." "Oh," she replied, "it's impossible to avoid vain thoughts." I was allowed to visit her once; she was cheerful and polite and had a pleasant conversation. The room was clean but had no furniture except for a mattress, a table with a crucifix and a book, a stool for me to sit on, and a picture above the fireplace of St. Veronica holding her handkerchief, which bore the miraculous image of Christ's bleeding face; she explained it to me very seriously. She appeared pale but was never sick, and I point out this as another example of how life and health can be sustained on such a small income.

At Watts's printing-house I contracted an acquaintance with an ingenious man, one Wygate, who, having wealthy relations, had been better educated than most printers; was a tolerable Latinist, spoke French, and loved reading. I taught him and a friend of his to swim at twice going into the river, and they soon became good swimmers. They introduced me to some gentlemen from the country, who went to Chelsea by water, to see the college and Don Saltero's curiosities. In our return, at the request of the company, whose curiosity Wygate had excited, I stripped and leaped into the river, and swam from near Chelsea to Blackfriars; performing in the way many feats of activity both upon and under the water, that surprised and pleased those to whom they were novelties. I had from a[Pg 66] child been delighted with this exercise, had studied and practised Thevenot's motions and positions, added some of mine own, aiming at the graceful and easy as well as the useful. All these I took this occasion of exhibiting to the company, and was much flattered by their admiration; and Wygate, who was desirous of becoming a master, grew more and more attached to me on that account, as well as from the similarity of our studies. He at length proposed to me travelling all over Europe together, supporting ourselves everywhere by working at our business. I was once inclined to it; but mentioning it to my good friend Mr. Denham, with whom I often spent an hour when I had leisure, he dissuaded me from it, advising me to think only of returning to Pennsylvania, which he was now about to do.

At Watts's printing house, I got to know a clever guy named Wygate. He had rich relatives, which meant he was educated better than most printers; he was pretty good at Latin, spoke French, and loved to read. I taught him and a friend of his how to swim after taking them to the river a couple of times, and they quickly became decent swimmers. They introduced me to some gentlemen from the countryside who took a boat to Chelsea to see the college and Don Saltero's curiosities. On the way back, at the company’s request—since Wygate had sparked their interest—I stripped off and jumped into the river, swimming from near Chelsea to Blackfriars. I showed off a bunch of impressive moves both above and below the water, which surprised and entertained them since they were all new to that. Since I was a child, I had loved swimming, studied and practiced Thevenot's techniques, and added some of my own, focusing on making it both graceful and useful. I took this chance to show off my skills, and I was really flattered by their praise. Wygate, eager to become a master himself, grew more attached to me, especially because we shared similar interests. Eventually, he suggested that we travel all over Europe together, making our living by working. I was tempted by the idea, but when I mentioned it to my good friend Mr. Denham, with whom I often spent an hour when I had free time, he talked me out of it, advising me to only think about going back to Pennsylvania, which he was about to do.

I must record one trait of this good man's character: he had formerly been in business at Bristol, but failed in debt to a number of people, compounded and went to America; there, by a close application to business as a merchant, he acquired a plentiful fortune in a few years. Returning to England in the ship with me, he invited his old creditors to an entertainment, at which he thanked them for the easy composition they had favoured him with, and when they expected nothing but the treat, every man at the first remove found under his plate an order on a banker for the full amount of the unpaid remainder, with interest.

I need to mention one aspect of this good man's character: he used to run a business in Bristol, but he ended up going bankrupt, owing a lot of money to several people. He made a settlement and moved to America; there, by working hard as a merchant, he built a considerable fortune in just a few years. When he returned to England on the same ship as me, he invited his old creditors to a gathering where he thanked them for their generous settlement. Just when they were expecting nothing more than the meal, each person found an order for the full amount of their unpaid debts, plus interest, under their plate.

He now told me he was about to return to Philadelphia, and should carry over a great quantity of goods in order to open a store there. He proposed to take me over as his clerk, to keep his books (in which he would instruct me), copy his letters, and attend the store; he added, that, as soon as I should be acquainted with mercantile business, he would promote me, by sending me with a cargo of flour and bread, &c., to the West Indies, and procure me[Pg 67] commissions from others which would be profitable; and, if I managed well, would establish me handsomely. The thing pleased me, for I was grown tired of London; remembered with pleasure the happy months I had spent in Pennsylvania, and wished again to see it; therefore I immediately agreed on the terms of fifty pounds a year, Pennsylvania money; less, indeed, than my present gettings as a compositor, but affording better prospects.

He told me he was about to go back to Philadelphia and would be bringing a large amount of goods to open a store there. He offered to take me with him as his clerk, to keep track of his accounts (which he would teach me how to do), write his letters, and help in the store. He added that once I learned the business, he would promote me by sending me with a shipment of flour and bread, etc., to the West Indies, and secure me commissions from others that would be profitable; and if I did well, it would set me up nicely. I liked the idea because I was getting tired of London; I fondly remembered the great months I had spent in Pennsylvania, and I wanted to see it again. So, I immediately agreed to the terms of fifty pounds a year in Pennsylvania currency; it was less than what I was currently making as a typesetter, but it offered better prospects.

I now took leave of printing, as I thought, for ever, and was daily employed in my new business: going about with Mr. Denham among the tradesmen, to purchase various articles and see them packed up, delivering messages, calling upon workmen to despatch, &c.; and, when all was on board, I had a few days' leisure. On one of these days I was, to my surprise, sent for by a great man, I knew only by name (Sir William Wyndham), and I waited upon him; he had heard, by some means or other, of my swimming from Chelsea to Blackfriars, and of my teaching Wygate and another young man to swim in a few hours: he had two sons, about to set out on their travels; he wished to have them first taught swimming, and proposed to gratify me handsomely if I would teach them. They were not yet come to town, and my stay was uncertain, so I could not undertake it; but from the incident I thought it likely, that if I were to remain in England and open a swimming school, I might get a good deal of money; and it struck me so strongly, that, had the overture been made me sooner, probably I should not so soon have returned to America. Many years after, you and I had something of more importance to do with one of those sons of Sir William Wyndham, become Earl of Egremont, which I shall mention in its place.

I now said goodbye to printing, or so I thought, forever, and I spent my days in my new job: going around with Mr. Denham among the tradespeople, buying various items and overseeing their packing, delivering messages, and asking workers to hurry things up, etc. Once everything was on board, I had a few days of free time. On one of those days, to my surprise, I was summoned by a prominent man I knew only by name (Sir William Wyndham), and I went to see him. He had heard, somehow, about my swimming from Chelsea to Blackfriars and how I taught Wygate and another young man to swim in just a few hours. He had two sons who were about to start traveling, and he wanted them to learn how to swim first. He offered to pay me well if I would teach them. They hadn’t arrived in town yet, and my stay was uncertain, so I couldn't take it on. However, from this incident, I thought it was likely that if I stayed in England and opened a swimming school, I could make quite a bit of money. The thought struck me so strongly that, if the offer had come to me sooner, I probably wouldn’t have returned to America so quickly. Many years later, you and I had something more significant to do with one of those sons of Sir William Wyndham, who became the Earl of Egremont, which I will mention at the appropriate time.

Thus I passed about eighteen months in London, most part of the time I worked hard at my business, and spent but little upon myself, except in[Pg 68] seeing plays and in books. My friend Ralph had kept me poor; he owed me about twenty-seven pounds, which I was now never likely to receive; a great sum out of my small earnings! I loved him, notwithstanding, for he had many amiable qualities. I had improved my knowledge, however, though I had by no means improved my fortune; but I had made some very ingenious acquaintance, whose conversation was of great advantage to me, and I had read considerably.

So, I spent about eighteen months in London. Most of the time, I worked hard at my job and hardly spent anything on myself, except for[Pg 68] watching plays and reading books. My friend Ralph kept me broke; he owed me around twenty-seven pounds, which I was unlikely to get back—quite a chunk of my small earnings! I still cared for him, though, because he had many nice qualities. While I hadn’t improved my financial situation, I did enhance my knowledge and made some clever acquaintances whose conversations were really beneficial to me, and I read a lot.

We sailed from Gravesend on the 23d of July, 1726. For the incidents of the voyage I refer you to my journal, where you will find them all minutely related. Perhaps the most important part of that journal is the plan to be found in it, which I formed at sea, for regulating the future conduct of my life. It is the more remarkable as being formed when I was so young, and yet being pretty faithfully adhered to quite through to old age.

We set sail from Gravesend on July 23, 1726. For the details of the voyage, I recommend checking my journal, where everything is thoroughly documented. One of the key parts of that journal is the plan I created at sea to guide my future actions. It's particularly notable because I came up with it when I was quite young, and I managed to stick to it for most of my life.

We landed at Philadelphia the 11th of October, where I found sundry alterations. Keith was no longer governor, being superseded by Major Gordon; I met him walking the streets as a common citizen; he seemed a little ashamed at seeing me, and passed without saying anything. I should have been as much ashamed at seeing Miss Read, had not her friends, despairing with reason of my return after the receipt of my letter, persuaded her to marry another, one Rogers, a potter, which was done in my absence. With him, however, she was never happy, and soon parted from him, refusing to cohabit with him or bear his name, it being now said he had another wife. He was a worthless fellow, though an excellent workman, which was the temptation to her friends; he got into debt, ran away in 1727 or 1728, went to the West Indies, and died there. Keimer had got a better house, a shop well supplied with stationary, plenty of new types, and a number of hands, though none good, and seemed to have a great deal of business.[Pg 69]

We arrived in Philadelphia on October 11th, where I noticed several changes. Keith was no longer the governor; he had been replaced by Major Gordon. I saw him walking the streets as an ordinary citizen; he appeared a bit embarrassed to see me and walked past without saying a word. I would have felt just as embarrassed seeing Miss Read if her friends hadn't, in their despair over my return after receiving my letter, convinced her to marry someone else, a potter named Rogers, which happened while I was away. However, she was never happy with him, and they soon separated, as she refused to live with him or take his name, since it was rumored that he already had another wife. He was a worthless man, although a skilled craftsman, which was the lure for her friends. He fell into debt, ran away in 1727 or 1728, went to the West Indies, and died there. Keimer had moved to a better house, had a well-stocked shop with stationery, plenty of new typefaces, and several workers, though none were very good, and he seemed to have a lot of business.[Pg 69]

Mr. Denham took a store in Water-street, where we opened our goods; I attended the business diligently, studied accounts, and grew in a little time expert at selling. We lodged and boarded together; he counselled me as a father, having a sincere regard for me: I respected and loved him, and we might have gone on together very happily, but in the beginning of February, 1727, when I had just passed my twenty-first year, we both were taken ill. My distemper was a pleurisy, which very nearly carried me off; I suffered a good deal, gave up the point in my own mind, and was at the time rather disappointed when I found myself recovering; regretting in some degree that I must now, some time or other, have all that disagreeable work to go over again. I forget what Mr. Denham's distemper was; it held him a long time, and at length carried him off. He left me a small legacy in a nuncupative will, as a token of his kindness to me, and he left me once more to the wide world, for the store was taken into the care of his executors, and my employment under him ended. My brother-in-law, Holmes, being now at Philadelphia, advised my return to my business; and Keimer tempted me with an offer of large wages by the year, to come and take the management of his printing-house, that he might better attend to his stationer's shop. I had heard a bad character of him in London from his wife and her friends, and was not for having any more to do with him. I wished for employment as a merchant's clerk, but not meeting with any, I closed again with Keimer. I found in his house these hands: Hugh Meredith, a Welsh Pennsylvanian, thirty years of age, bred to country work; he was honest, sensible, a man of experience, and fond of reading, but addicted to drinking. Stephen Potts, a young countryman of full age, bred to the same, of uncommon natural parts, and great wit and humour, but a little idle. These he had[Pg 70] agreed with at extreme low wages per week, to be raised a shilling every three months as they should deserve by improving in their business; and the expectation of these high wages to come on hereafter was what he had drawn them in with. Meredith was to work at press, Potts at bookbinding, which he, by agreement, was to teach them, though he knew neither one nor the other. John Savage, an Irishman, brought up to no business, whose service for four years Keimer had purchased from the captain of a ship; he too was to be made a pressman. George Webb, an Oxford scholar, whose time for four years he had likewise bought, intending him for a compositor (of whom more presently), and David Harry, a country boy, whom he had taken apprentice.

Mr. Denham rented a store on Water Street, where we unpacked our goods. I focused on the business, learned the accounting, and quickly became skilled at selling. We lived and shared meals together; he advised me like a father and truly cared for me. I respected and admired him, and we could have continued happily together, but at the beginning of February 1727, just after I turned twenty-one, we both fell ill. I had pleurisy, which almost took my life; I endured a lot, mentally conceded defeat, and was somewhat surprised when I started recovering, regretting that I would eventually have to go through all that unpleasantness again. I can't recall what illness Mr. Denham had; it kept him sick for a long time and ultimately led to his death. He left me a small inheritance in an oral will as a sign of his kindness, and once again, I was left to face the world alone, as his executors took over the store, ending my job with him. My brother-in-law, Holmes, who was now in Philadelphia, encouraged me to return to my work, and Keimer lured me in with an offer of a high salary to manage his printing house while he focused on his stationery shop. I had heard negative things about him in London from his wife and her friends and wanted nothing more to do with him. I hoped to find work as a merchant's clerk, but finding none, I reluctantly agreed to go back to Keimer. At his shop, I met these guys: Hugh Meredith, a thirty-year-old Welshman from Pennsylvania, trained in manual labor; he was honest, sensible, experienced, and loved to read, but struggled with drinking. Stephen Potts, a young local guy, was full-aged, naturally clever, and had a great sense of humor, although he was a bit lazy. Keimer had made agreements with them at very low weekly wages, promising to raise their pay by a shilling every three months if they improved their skills. The lure of these higher future wages is what drew them in. Meredith was supposed to work the press, and Potts was to learn bookbinding, which he would teach them, even though he wasn't skilled at either. John Savage, an Irishman with no particular trade, had his service for four years bought from a ship's captain; he was also meant to become a pressman. George Webb, a scholar from Oxford, had also had his four years purchased, and Keimer intended him to be a compositor (more on that later), along with David Harry, a local boy he had taken on as an apprentice.

I soon perceived that the intention of engaging me, at wages so much higher than he had been used to give, was to have these raw, cheap hands formed through me; and, as soon as I had instructed them (they being all articled to him), he should be able to do without me. I went, however, very cheerfully, put his printing-house in order, which had been in great confusion, and brought his hands by degrees to mind their business, and to do it better.

I quickly realized that the reason he hired me at such high pay was to train these inexperienced, low-cost workers; once I taught them (since they were all contracted to him), he would no longer need me. Still, I went in with a positive attitude, organized his printing house, which was quite chaotic, and gradually got his workers to focus on their tasks and improve their performance.

It was an odd thing to find an Oxford scholar in the situation of a bought servant; he was not more than eighteen years of age; he gave me this account of himself: that he was born in Gloucester, educated at a grammar-school, and had been distinguished among the scholars for some apparent superiority in performing his part when they exhibited plays; belonged to the Wit's club there, and had written some pieces in prose and verse, which were printed in the Gloucester newspapers; thence was sent to Oxford; there he continued about a year, but not well satisfied, wishing of all things to see London and become a player. At length, receiving his quarterly allowance of fifteen guineas[Pg 71] instead of discharging his debts he went out of town, hid his gown in a furz bush, and walked to London, where, having no friend to advise him, he fell into bad company, soon spent his guineas, found no means of being introduced among the players, grew necessitous, pawned his clothes, and wanted bread. Walking the street, very hungry, and not knowing what to do with himself, a crimp's bill was put into his hand, offering immediate entertainment and encouragement to such as would bind themselves to serve in America; he went directly, signed the indentures, was put into the ship, and came over, never writing a line to his friends to acquaint them what was become of him. He was lively, witty, good-natured, and a pleasant companion; but idle, thoughtless, and imprudent to the last degree.

It was strange to find an Oxford scholar in the position of a servant; he was no more than eighteen years old. He told me about himself: he was born in Gloucester, educated at a grammar school, and had stood out among the students for his obvious talent in performing during their plays. He belonged to the Wit's club and had written some pieces in prose and poetry, which were published in the Gloucester newspapers. After that, he was sent to Oxford, where he stayed for about a year but was not happy, longing to see London and become an actor. Eventually, after receiving his quarterly allowance of fifteen guineas[Pg 71], instead of paying off his debts, he left town, hid his academic gown in a furze bush, and walked to London. With no one to guide him, he ended up in bad company, quickly spent his guineas, found it hard to connect with the actors, became desperate, pawned his clothes, and was left hungry. While wandering the streets, very hungry and unsure of what to do, he was handed a crimp's bill, offering immediate help and encouragement to those willing to commit to serve in America. He went straight to sign the contract, was put on a ship, and came over, never writing to let his friends know what had happened to him. He was lively, witty, good-natured, and a fun companion, but he was also lazy, careless, and recklessly imprudent.

John, the Irishman, soon ran away; with the rest I began to live very agreeably, for they all respected me the more, as they found Keimer incapable of instructing them, and that from me they learned something daily. My acquaintance with ingenious people in the town increased. We never worked on Saturday, that being Keimer's Sabbath, so that I had two days for reading. Keimer himself treated me with great civility and apparent regard, and nothing now made me uneasy but my debt to Vernon, which I was yet unable to pay, being hitherto but a poor economist; he, however, kindly made no demand of it.

John, the Irishman, quickly left; with the others, I started to live quite comfortably, as they all respected me more when they realized Keimer was unable to teach them, and they learned something from me every day. My circle of smart people in town grew. We never worked on Saturdays since that was Keimer's day of rest, so I had two days to read. Keimer himself treated me with a lot of courtesy and obvious respect, and the only thing that bothered me was my debt to Vernon, which I still couldn't pay, as I had always been bad with money; however, he kindly did not pressure me for it.

Our printing-house often wanted sorts, and there was no letter foundry in America. I had seen types cast at James's in London, but without much attention to the manner; however, I now contrived a mould, and made use of the letters we had as puncheons, struck the matrices in lead, and thus supplied, in a pretty tolerable way, all deficiencies. I also engraved several things on occasion; made the ink; I was warehouse-man, and, in short, quite a factotum.[Pg 72]

Our printing house often ran short on types, and there was no letter foundry in America. I had seen types cast at James's in London, but I hadn't really paid much attention to the process. Now, I figured out a mold and used the letters we had as stamps, struck the matrices in lead, and in this way, managed to cover all our deficiencies pretty well. I also engraved various items when needed, made the ink, handled the warehouse, and, in short, was quite the factotum.[Pg 72]

But, however serviceable I might be, I found that my services became every day of less importance, as the other hands improved in their business; and when Keimer paid me a second quarter's wages, he let me know that he felt them too heavy, and thought I should make an abatement. He grew by degrees less civil, put on more the airs of master, frequently found fault, was captious, and seemed ready for an outbreaking. I went on, nevertheless, with a good deal of patience, thinking that his encumbered circumstances were partly the cause. At length a trifle snapped our connexion; for a great noise happening near the courthouse, I put my head out of the window to see what was the matter. Keimer, being in the street, looked up and saw me; called out to me in a loud voice and an angry tone, to mind my business; adding some reproachful words, that nettled me the more for their publicity; all the neighbours, who were looking out on the same occasion, being witnesses how I was treated. He came up immediately into the printing-house; continued the quarrel; high words passed on both sides; he gave me the quarter's warning we had stipulated, expressing a wish that he had not been obliged to so long a warning. I told him his wish was unnecessary, for I would leave him that instant; and so, taking my hat, walked out of doors, desiring Meredith, whom I saw below, to take care of some things I left and bring them to my lodgings.

But no matter how useful I was, I noticed that my contributions became less important as the other workers got better at their jobs. When Keimer paid me for my second quarter, he mentioned that he found my wages too high and thought I should take a pay cut. Gradually, he became less polite, acted more like the boss, often found faults, was picky, and seemed ready to explode. Still, I managed to be quite patient, thinking his financial troubles were partly to blame. Finally, a small thing ended our working relationship. There was a loud noise near the courthouse, so I leaned out the window to see what was going on. Keimer saw me from the street and shouted at me in an angry tone to mind my business, throwing some insulting words my way that bothered me even more because other neighbors were watching. He came up right away to the printing house and continued the argument; we exchanged harsh words, and he gave me the quarter's notice we had agreed on, wishing he didn’t have to give such long notice. I told him his wish was pointless because I would leave immediately. So, I put on my hat, walked out the door, and asked Meredith, who I saw downstairs, to look after some things I was leaving behind and bring them to my place.

Meredith came accordingly in the evening, when we talked my affair over. He had conceived a great regard for me, and was very unwilling that I should leave the house while he remained in it. He dissuaded me from returning to my native country, which I began to think of; he reminded me that Keimer was in debt for all he possessed; that his creditors began to be uneasy; that he kept his shop miserably, sold often without a profit for ready money, and often trusted without keeping accounts[Pg 73] that he must therefore fail, which would make a vacancy I might profit of. I objected my want of money. He then let me know that his father had a high opinion of me, and, from some discourse that had passed between them, he was sure he would advance money to set me up, if I would enter into partnership with him. My time, said he, will be out with Keimer in the spring; by that time we may have our press and types in from London. I am sensible I am no workman: if you like it, your skill in the business shall be set against the stock I furnish, and we will share the profits equally. The proposal was agreeable to me, and I consented; his father was in town and approved of it; the more, he said, as I had great influence with his son; had prevailed on him to abstain long from dram-drinking, and he hoped might break him of that wretched habit entirely when we came to be so closely connected. I gave an inventory to the father, who carried it to a merchant: the things were sent for, the secret was to be kept till they should arrive, and in the mean time I was to get work, if I could, at the other printing-house. But I found no vacancy there, and so remained idle a few days, when Keimer, on a prospect of being employed to print some paper money in New-Jersey, which would require cuts and various types that I only could supply, and apprehending Bradford might engage me and get the job from him, sent me a very civil message, that old friends should not part for a few words, the effect of sudden passion, and wishing me to return. Meredith persuaded me to comply, as it would give more opportunity for his improvement under my daily instructions; so I returned, and we went on more smoothly than for some time before. The New-Jersey job was obtained; I contrived a copperplate press for it, the first that had been seen in the country; I cut several ornaments and checks for the bills. We went together to Burlington, where I executed[Pg 74] the whole to satisfaction; and he received so large a sum for the work as to be enabled thereby to keep himself longer from ruin.

Meredith came over in the evening, and we discussed my situation. He had developed a strong affection for me and was hesitant about me leaving the house while he was still there. He advised against my returning to my home country, which I had started to consider; he reminded me that Keimer was in debt for everything he owned, that his creditors were getting restless, that he ran his shop poorly, often sold without making any profit for cash, and frequently trusted customers without keeping records[Pg 73]. He believed he would definitely fail, which would create an opportunity that I could benefit from. I raised my concern about lacking funds. He then informed me that his father held me in high regard and, from some conversations they'd had, he was sure his father would be willing to lend money to help me get started if I partnered with him. He mentioned that his time with Keimer would end in the spring; by then, we might have our printing press and types from London. I was aware that I wasn’t a skilled tradesman: if I was on board, my expertise in the business could be considered against the investment he would provide, and we would split the profits equally. The offer appealed to me, and I agreed; his father was in town and approved of it as well, adding that I had a significant influence on his son; I had convinced him to stay away from alcohol for a while, and he hoped I could help him completely break that awful habit once we became partners. I gave an inventory to his father, who took it to a merchant: the items were ordered, and we kept the plan a secret until they arrived; in the meantime, I was to find work, if possible, at the other printing house. However, I couldn’t find a position there and ended up being idle for a few days. Keimer, anticipating a job to print some paper money in New Jersey that required designs and types I could provide, sent me a polite message, saying old friends shouldn’t let a few words, born of momentary anger, come between them, inviting me to come back. Meredith convinced me to return, as it would give him more chances to learn from my daily guidance; so I went back, and things improved between us more than they had in a while. The New Jersey job was secured; I designed a copperplate press for it, the first one in the area; I cut out several decorative designs for the bills. We traveled together to Burlington, where I handled everything to satisfaction, and he earned a substantial payment for the work, which allowed him to fend off impending ruin for a longer time.

At Burlington I made an acquaintance with many principal people of the province. Several of them had been appointed by the Assembly a committee to attend the press, and take care that no more bills were printed than the law directed. They were, therefore, by turns, constantly with us, and generally he who attended brought with him a friend or two for company. My mind having been much more improved by reading than Keimer's, I suppose it was for that reason my conversation seemed to be more valued. They had me to their houses, introduced me to their friends, and showed me much civility; while he, though the master, was a little neglected. In truth, he was an odd creature; ignorant of common life, fond of rudely opposing received opinions; slovenly to extreme dirtiness; enthusiastic in some points of religion, and a little knavish withal. We continued there near three months, and by that time I could reckon among my acquired friends Judge Allen, Samuel Bustill, the secretary of the province, Isaac Pearson, Joseph Cooper, and several of the Smiths, members of Assembly, and Isaac Decow, the surveyor-general. The latter was a shrewd, sagacious old man, who told me that he began for himself, when young, by wheeling clay for the brickmakers, learned to write after he was of age, carried the chain for surveyors, who taught him surveying, and he had now, by his industry, acquired a good estate; and, said he, I foresee you will soon work this man out of his business, and make a fortune in it at Philadelphia. He had then not the least intimation of my intention to set up there or anywhere. These friends were afterward of great use to me, as I occasionally was to some of them. They all continued their regard for me as long as they lived.[Pg 75]

At Burlington, I got to know many key people in the province. A few of them had been appointed by the Assembly as a committee to oversee the press and make sure that no more bills were printed than the law allowed. They often came to see us one after another, and generally, whoever came brought a friend or two along. I had improved my mind much more through reading than Keimer had, so I think that’s why my conversation was more appreciated. They invited me to their homes, introduced me to their friends, and treated me with a lot of respect, while Keimer, despite being the master, was a bit overlooked. Honestly, he was a strange guy; he knew nothing of everyday life, enjoyed rudely challenging popular opinions, was extremely messy, was enthusiastic about certain aspects of religion, and was a bit crafty as well. We stayed there for nearly three months, and by that time, I had made friends with Judge Allen, Samuel Bustill, the provincial secretary, Isaac Pearson, Joseph Cooper, several members of the Smith family from the Assembly, and Isaac Decow, the surveyor-general. Decow was a sharp, wise old man who told me that he started young by hauling clay for brickmakers, learned to write after he turned of age, carried the chain for surveyors who taught him surveying, and had now built up a nice estate through hard work. He said, "I can see you’ll soon push this man out of his job and make a fortune in Philadelphia." At that time, he had no clue that I was planning to set up shop there or anywhere else. These friends ended up being very helpful to me, just as I occasionally was to them. They all continued to care for me throughout their lives.[Pg 75]

Before I enter upon my public appearance in business, it may be well to let you know the then state of my mind with regard to my principles and morals, that you may see how far those influenced the future events of my life. My parents had early given me religious impressions, and brought me through my childhood piously in the dissenting way. But I was scarce fifteen, when, after doubting by turns several points, as I found them disputed in the different books I read, I began to doubt of the revelation itself. Some books against Deism fell into my hands; they were said to be the substance of the sermons which had been preached at Boyle's Lectures. It happened that they wrought an effect on me quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the Deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared to me much stronger than the refutation; in short, I soon became a thorough Deist. My arguments perverted some others, particularly Collins and Ralph: but each of these having wronged me greatly without the least compunction; and recollecting Keith's conduct towards me (who was another freethinker), and my own towards Vernon and Miss Read, which at times gave me great trouble, I began to suspect that this doctrine, though it might be true, was not very useful. My London pamphlet (printed in 1725)—which had for its motto these lines of Dryden:

Before I dive into my public life in business, I think it's important to share my mindset regarding my principles and morals, so you can see how they influenced the events that followed in my life. My parents instilled religious beliefs in me early on and raised me in a strict dissenting environment during my childhood. But when I was barely fifteen, I started to question various points, as I came across conflicting views in the different books I read, eventually leading me to doubt the revelation itself. I came across some books that were critical of Deism; they were supposedly the main points from sermons preached at Boyle's Lectures. Surprisingly, these books had the opposite effect on me than what was intended. The Deist arguments they aimed to refute seemed much stronger to me than the rebuttals provided. In no time, I became a full-fledged Deist. My arguments influenced a few others, particularly Collins and Ralph; however, both of them wronged me significantly without any remorse. Reflecting on Keith's treatment of me (he was another freethinker) and my own behavior towards Vernon and Miss Read, which often troubled me, I started to suspect that this doctrine, while it might be true, wasn’t particularly beneficial. My pamphlet from London (printed in 1725)—which featured these lines by Dryden as its motto:

"Whatever exists, is as it should be. Even if a blind man
Can only see a small part of the chain, the nearest link,
His sight doesn't reach the balance point
That holds everything in place above—"

and which, from the attributes of God, his infinite wisdom, goodness, and power, concluded that nothing could possibly be wrong in the world; and that vice and virtue were empty distinctions, no such things existing—appeared now not so clever a performance as I once thought it; and I doubted[Pg 76] whether some error had not insinuated itself unperceived into my argument, so as to infect all that followed, as is common in metaphysical reasonings. I grew convinced that truth, sincerity, and integrity, in dealings between man and man, were of the utmost importance to the felicity of life; and I formed written resolutions (which still remain in my journal-book) to practise them ever while I lived. Revelation had indeed no weight with me as such; but I entertained an opinion that, though certain actions might not be bad because they were forbidden by it, or good because it commanded them, yet probably those actions might be forbidden because they were bad for us, or commanded because they were beneficial to us, in their own natures, all the circumstances of things considered. And this persuasion, with the kind hand of Providence, or some guardian angel, or accidental favourable circumstances and situations, or all together, preserved me through the dangerous time of youth and the hazardous situations I was sometimes in among strangers, remote from the eye and advice of my father, free from any wilful gross immorality or injustice that might have been expected from my want of religion; I say wilful, because the instances I have mentioned had something of necessity in them, from my youth, inexperience, and the knavery of others: I had, therefore, a tolerable character to begin the world with; I valued it properly, and determined to preserve it.

and which, based on the qualities of God—His infinite wisdom, goodness, and power—led me to conclude that nothing could possibly be wrong in the world, and that vice and virtue were meaningless labels, with no real existence. This didn't seem as clever to me now as I once thought; I began to doubt[Pg 76] whether an unnoticed error had crept into my reasoning, potentially tainting everything that followed, which often happens in philosophical discussions. I became convinced that truth, sincerity, and integrity in interactions between people were essential for a happy life; I even wrote down resolutions (which still remain in my journal) to practice these values for as long as I lived. Revelation didn’t carry much weight with me as such; however, I believed that while certain actions might not be bad just because they were forbidden, or good just because they were commanded, those actions might be prohibited because they were harmful to us, or commanded because they were beneficial in their own right, considering all circumstances. And this belief, along with the kind guidance of Providence, or perhaps a guardian angel, or just some fortunate circumstances, helped me navigate the risky times of my youth and the dangerous situations I sometimes faced among strangers, away from my father’s watchful eye and advice, without engaging in any wilful gross immorality or injustice that might have been expected due to my lack of religion; I say wilful because the instances I mentioned had elements of necessity stemming from my youth, inexperience, and the deceitfulness of others: Therefore, I had a decent reputation to start my life with; I valued it appropriately and was determined to maintain it.

We had not been long returned to Philadelphia before the new types arrived from London. We settled with Keimer, and left him by his consent before he heard of it. We found a house to hire near the market, and took it. To lessen the rent (which was then but twenty-four pounds a year, though I have since known it to let for seventy), we took in Thomas Godfrey, a glazier, and his family, who were to pay a considerable part of it to us,[Pg 77] and we to board with them. We had scarce opened our letters and put our press in order, before George House, an acquaintance of mine, brought a countryman to us, whom he had met in the street inquiring for a printer. All our cash was now expended in the variety of particulars we had been obliged to procure, and this countryman's five shillings, being our first fruits, and coming so seasonably, gave me more pleasure than any crown I have since earned; and, from the gratitude I felt towards House, has made me often more ready than perhaps I otherwise should have been, to assist young beginners.

We hadn’t been back in Philadelphia long before the new type arrived from London. We settled things with Keimer and left him with his agreement before he even knew about it. We found a house to rent near the market and took it. To lower our rent (which was just twenty-four pounds a year at that time, though I’ve since seen it rent for seventy), we brought in Thomas Godfrey, a glazier, and his family, who would pay a good portion of it to us, and we would board with them. We had barely opened our letters and set up our press when George House, a friend of mine, brought a farmer to us, who he had met in the street looking for a printer. All our cash was now spent on the various things we needed to buy, and this farmer’s five shillings, being our first earnings, and coming at just the right time, gave me more joy than any crown I’ve earned since; and, out of gratitude towards House, this has often made me more willing than I might have been otherwise to help young newcomers.

There are croakers in every country always boding its ruin. Such a one there lived in Philadelphia, a person of note, an elderly man, with a wise look and a very grave manner of speaking; his name was Samuel Mickle. This gentleman, a stranger to me, stopped me one day at my door, and asked me if I was the young man who had lately opened a new printing-house. Being answered in the affirmative, he said he was sorry for me, because it was an expensive undertaking, and the expense would be lost, for Philadelphia was a sinking place; the people already half bankrupts, or near being so; all the appearances of the country, such as new buildings and the rise of rents, being to his certain knowledge fallacious; for they were, in fact, among the things that would ruin us. Then he gave me such a detail of misfortunes now existing, or that were soon to exist, that he left me half melancholy. Had I known him before I engaged in this business, probably I never should have done it. This person continued to live in this decaying place, and to declaim in the same strain, refusing for many years to buy a house there, because all was going to destruction; and at last I had the pleasure of seeing him give five times as much for[Pg 78] one as he might have bought it for when he first began croaking.

There are pessimists in every country always predicting its downfall. One such person lived in Philadelphia, a notable elderly man with a wise look and a serious way of speaking; his name was Samuel Mickle. This gentleman, a stranger to me, stopped me one day at my door and asked if I was the young man who recently opened a new printing house. When I confirmed it, he expressed his sympathy, saying it was a costly venture and that the investment would be wasted because Philadelphia was on the decline; the people were already half bankrupt or close to it. According to him, all the signs of growth, like new buildings and rising rents, were misleading; in reality, they were among the factors that would ruin us. He then listed so many existing and impending misfortunes that I felt quite down afterward. If I had known him before starting this business, I probably would have thought twice about it. This man continued to live in this decaying place and to complain in the same way, refusing for many years to buy a house there because everything was bound for ruin. In the end, I was pleased to see him pay five times as much for[Pg 78] one as he could have purchased it for when he first began to lament.

I should have mentioned before, that in the autumn of the preceding year I had formed most of my ingenious acquaintance into a club for mutual improvement, which we called the Junto; we met on Friday evenings. The rules that I drew up required that every member in his turn should produce one or more queries on any point of morals, politics, or natural philosophy, to be discussed by the company; and once in three months produce and read an essay of his own writing, on any subject he pleased. Our debates were to be under the direction of a president, and to be conducted in the sincere spirit of inquiry after truth, without fondness for dispute or desire of victory; and to prevent warmth, all expressions of positiveness in opinions or direct contradiction were after some time made contraband, and prohibited under small pecuniary penalties.

I should have mentioned earlier that in the fall of the previous year, I had gathered most of my clever friends into a club for mutual improvement, which we called the Group; we met on Friday evenings. The rules I created required that each member, in turn, present one or more questions on any topic related to morals, politics, or natural philosophy for the group to discuss; and once every three months, they would also write and read an essay on any subject they chose. Our discussions were to be led by a president and conducted in a genuine spirit of inquiry for truth, without a love for arguments or a desire to win; to avoid heated debates, any strong expressions of opinion or direct contradiction were eventually banned, with small fines for violations.

The first members were Joseph Brientnal, a copier of deeds for the scriveners; a good-natured, friendly, middle-aged man, a great lover of poetry, reading all he could meet with, and writing some that was tolerable; very ingenious in making little knickknackeries, and of sensible conversation.

The first members were Joseph Brientnal, a deed copier for the scriveners; a kind, friendly, middle-aged guy who loved poetry, reading everything he could find, and writing some decent stuff; very skilled at making small trinkets, and great at having a sensible conversation.

Thomas Godfrey, a self-taught mathematician, great in his way, and afterward inventor of what is now called Hadley's Quadrant. But he knew little out of his way, and was not a pleasing companion; as, like most great mathematicians I have met with, he expected universal precision in everything said, or was for ever denying or distinguishing upon trifles, to the disturbance of all conversation; he soon left us.

Thomas Godfrey was a self-taught mathematician and later invented what we now call Hadley's Quadrant. However, he didn’t know much outside of his area, and he wasn’t very enjoyable to be around; like most brilliant mathematicians I’ve encountered, he expected everyone to be perfectly precise in their speech or would constantly nitpick over small details, disrupting the flow of conversation. He soon left us.

Nicholas Scull, a surveyor, afterward surveyor-general, who loved books, and sometimes made a few verses.

Nicholas Scull, a surveyor and later the surveyor-general, who loved reading and occasionally wrote some poetry.

William Parsons, bred a shoemaker, but loving[Pg 79] reading, had acquired a considerable share of mathematics, which he first studied with a view to astrology, and afterward laughed at it; he also became surveyor-general.

William Parsons, raised as a shoemaker but passionate about[Pg 79] reading, gained a solid understanding of mathematics, initially studying it to pursue astrology, which he later mocked; he also became the surveyor-general.

William Maugridge, joiner, but a most exquisite mechanic, and a solid, sensible man.

William Maugridge, a carpenter, but also an incredibly skilled craftsman and a practical, down-to-earth person.

Hugh Meredith, Stephen Potts, and George Webb, I have characterized before.

Hugh Meredith, Stephen Potts, and George Webb, I've described them before.

Robert Grace, a young gentleman of some fortune, generous, lively, and witty; a lover of punning and of his friends.

Robert Grace, a young man with some wealth, is generous, lively, and witty; he loves making puns and enjoys being with his friends.

Lastly, William Coleman, then a merchant's clerk, about my age, who had the coolest, clearest head, the best heart, and the exactest morals of almost any man I ever met with. He became afterward a merchant of great note, and one of our provincial judges. Our friendship continued without interruption to his death, upward of forty years; and the club continued almost as long, and was the best school of philosophy, morality, and politics that then existed in the province; for our queries (which were read the week preceding their discussion) put us upon reading with attention on the several subjects, that we might speak more to the purpose: and here, too, we acquired better habits of conversation, everything being studied in our rules which might prevent our disgusting each other; hence the long continuance of the club, which I shall have frequent occasion to speak farther of hereafter. But my giving this account of it here is to show something of the interest I had, every one of these exerting themselves in recommending business to us. Brientnal particularly procured us from the Quakers the printing of forty sheets of their history, the rest being to be done by Keimer; and upon these we worked exceeding hard, for the price was low. It was a folio, pro patria size, in pica, with long-primer notes. I composed a sheet a day, and Meredith worked it off at press; it was often[Pg 80] eleven at night, and sometimes later, before I had finished my distribution for the next day's work, for the little jobs sent in by our other friends now and then put us back. But so determined I was to continue doing a sheet a day of the folio, that one night, when, having imposed my forms, I thought my day's work over, one of them by accident was broken, and two pages reduced to pi, I immediately distributed and composed it over again before I went to bed; and this industry, visible to our neighbours, began to give us character and credit; particularly, I was told, that mention being made of the new printing-office at the merchants' every-night club, the general opinion was that it must fail, there being already two printers in the place, Keimer and Bradford; but Dr. Baird (whom you and I saw many years after at his native place, St. Andrew's in Scotland), gave a contrary opinion: "For the industry of that Franklin," said he, "is superior to anything I ever saw of the kind; I see him still at work when I go home from the club, and he is at work again before his neighbours are out of bed." This struck the rest, and we soon after had offers from one of them to supply us with stationary; but, as yet, we did not choose to engage in shop business.

Lastly, William Coleman, who was a merchant's clerk around my age, had the coolest, clearest mind, the best heart, and the most precise morals of almost anyone I ever met. He eventually became a well-known merchant and one of our provincial judges. Our friendship lasted without interruption until his death, which was over forty years later; the club we were part of lasted nearly as long and was the best school for philosophy, morality, and politics that existed in the province at the time. Our topics (which we read about the week before discussing) encouraged us to read attentively on various subjects so we could contribute more meaningfully. We also developed better conversation habits, as our rules aimed to prevent us from irritating one another, which helped the club endure for so long—something I will refer to again later. I mention this here to highlight the interest I had in it, with everyone working hard to recommend projects to us. Brientnal especially arranged for us to print forty sheets of the Quakers' history, while the rest was to be done by Keimer; we worked extremely hard on these since the pay was low. It was a folio, pro patria size, printed in pica with long-primer notes. I managed to compose a sheet a day and Meredith printed it; often, it was past eleven at night, and sometimes later, by the time I finished preparing for the next day’s work, especially because the small jobs sent in by our other friends occasionally delayed us. But I was so determined to keep up my pace of one sheet a day that one night, after thinking I had finished my work for the day, one of my forms accidentally broke, and two pages were scrambled. I quickly re-distributed and re-composed them before going to bed; this effort, visible to our neighbors, started to build our reputation and credibility. In particular, I was told that when the new printing office was mentioned at the merchants' club, the general opinion was that we would fail since there were already two printers in town, Keimer and Bradford. However, Dr. Baird (whom you and I saw many years later in his hometown of St. Andrew's in Scotland) disagreed: “The industry of that Franklin,” he said, “is unlike anything I’ve ever seen; I still see him working when I come home from the club, and he’s already back at it before his neighbors are out of bed.” This impressed the others, and shortly after, we received offers from one of them to supply us with stationery; but for now, we didn’t want to get involved in retail business.

I mention this industry the more particularly and the more freely, though it seems to be talking in my own praise, that those of my posterity who shall read it may know the use of that virtue, when they see its effects in my favour throughout this relation.

I bring up this industry more specifically and openly, even though it sounds like I'm praising myself, so that my descendants who read this will understand the value of that virtue when they see its positive impact on me throughout this account.

George Webb, who had found a female friend that lent him wherewith to purchase his time of Keimer, now came to offer himself as a journeyman to us. We could not then employ him; but I foolishly let him know, as a secret, that I soon intended to begin a newspaper, and might then have work for him. My hopes of success, as I told him, were founded on this, that the then only newspaper[Pg 81] printed by Bradford, was a paltry thing, wretchedly managed, no way entertaining, and yet was profitable to him; I therefore freely thought a good paper would scarcely fail of good encouragement. I requested Webb not to mention it, but he told it to Keimer, who immediately, to be beforehand with me, published proposals for one himself, on which Webb was to be employed. I was vexed at this, and to counteract them, not being able to commence our paper, I wrote several amusing pieces for Bradford's paper, under the title of the Busybody, which Brientnal continued some months. By this means the attention of the public was fixed on that paper, and Keimer's proposals, which we burlesqued and ridiculed, were disregarded. He began his paper, however, and before carrying it on three quarters of a year, with at most only ninety subscribers, he offered it me for a trifle; and I having been ready some time to go on with it, took it in hand directly, and it proved in a few years extremely profitable to me.

George Webb, who had found a female friend to help him buy his time with Keimer, came to offer himself as a journeyman to us. We couldn't hire him at that moment, but I foolishly let him in on a secret: I planned to start a newspaper soon and might have work for him then. My hopes for success, as I explained to him, were based on the fact that the only newspaper at the time, printed by Bradford, was a terrible publication—poorly managed, uninteresting, and still making money for him. So, I genuinely believed a good newspaper would get good support. I asked Webb not to say anything, but he told Keimer, who immediately published his own proposals for one to get ahead of me, with Webb set to be employed. I was frustrated by this, and to counteract them, not being able to start our paper yet, I wrote several entertaining pieces for Bradford's paper under the title of the Nosy person, which Brientnal continued for several months. This drew the public's attention to that paper, and Keimer's proposals, which we mocked and ridiculed, were ignored. He did start his paper, but after running it for less than nine months, with at most ninety subscribers, he offered it to me for a small amount. Since I had been ready for some time to go ahead with it, I jumped at the chance, and it turned out to be very profitable for me within a few years.

I perceive that I am apt to speak in the singular number, though our partnership still continued; it may be that, in fact, the whole management of the business lay upon me. Meredith was no compositor, a poor pressman, and seldom sober. My friends lamented my connexion with him, but I was to make the best of it.

I realize that I tend to speak for myself, even though our partnership was still ongoing; it might be true that the entire management of the business rested on my shoulders. Meredith wasn't a typesetter, was a bad pressman, and was rarely sober. My friends expressed concern about my association with him, but I just had to make the best of the situation.

Our first papers made quite a different appearance from any before printed in the province; a better type, and better printed; but some remarks of my writing on the dispute then going on between Governor Burnet and the Massachusetts Assembly, struck the principal people, occasioned the paper and the manager of it to be much talked of, and in a few weeks brought them all to be our subscribers.

Our initial papers looked really different from anything that had been printed in the province before; they used a better type and were printed better. However, some comments I made about the ongoing dispute between Governor Burnet and the Massachusetts Assembly caught the attention of key figures, leading to a lot of buzz about the paper and its manager. Within a few weeks, this led to almost all of them subscribing.

Their example was followed by many, and our number went on growing continually. This was one of the first good effects of my having learned[Pg 82] a little to scribble; another was, that the leading men, seeing a newspaper now in the hands of those who could also handle a pen, thought it convenient to oblige and encourage me. Bradford still printed the votes, and laws, and other public business. He had printed an address of the house to the governor in a coarse, blundering manner; we reprinted it elegantly and correctly, and sent one to every member. They were sensible of the difference; it strengthened the hands of our friends in the house; and they voted us their printers for the year ensuing.

Their example inspired many others, and our numbers kept growing steadily. This was one of the first positive outcomes of my learning[Pg 82] to write a bit; another was that the influential people, seeing a newspaper now in the hands of those who could also write, found it useful to support and encourage me. Bradford still printed the votes, laws, and other public matters. He had printed a message from the house to the governor in a rough, clumsy way; we reprinted it in a polished and accurate manner, and sent one to every member. They recognized the difference; it bolstered our allies in the house; and they appointed us as their printers for the following year.

Among my friends in the house I must not forget Mr. Hamilton, before mentioned, who was then returned from England, and had a seat in it. He interested himself for me strongly in that instance, as he did in many others afterward, continuing his patronage till his death.[9]

Among my friends in the house, I shouldn't forget Mr. Hamilton, who I mentioned earlier. He had just returned from England and had a seat there. He strongly advocated for me in that situation, as he did in many others later on, continuing to support me until his death.[9]

Mr. Vernon, about this time, put me in mind of the debt I owed him, but did not press me. I wrote him an ingenuous letter of acknowledgment, craving his forbearance a little longer, which he allowed me; as soon as I was able, I paid the principal with the interest, and many thanks: so that erratum was in some degree corrected.

Mr. Vernon, around this time, reminded me of the debt I owed him, but he didn't pressure me. I wrote him a sincere letter acknowledging the debt, asking for a little more patience, which he granted. As soon as I could, I paid back the principal along with the interest, and expressed my gratitude: so that erratum was somewhat rectified.

But now another difficulty came upon me which I had never the least reason to expect. Mr. Meredith's father, who was to have paid for our printing-house, according to the expectations given me, was able to advance only one hundred pounds currency, which had been paid; and a hundred more was due to the merchant, who grew impatient, and sued us all. We gave bail, but saw that, if the money could not be raised in time, the suit must soon come to a judgment and execution, and our hopeful prospects must with us be ruined, as the press and letters must be sold for payment, perhaps at half price.[Pg 83] In this distress two true friends, whose kindness I have never forgotten, nor ever shall forget while I can remember anything, came to me separately, unknown to each other, and without any application from me, offered each of them to advance me all the money that should be necessary to enable me to take the whole business upon myself, if that should be practicable; but they did not like my continuing the partnership with Meredith, who, as they said, was often seen drunk in the street, playing at low games in alehouses much to our discredit; these two friends were William Coleman and Robert Grace. I told them I could not propose a separation while any prospect remained of the Merediths fulfilling their part of our agreement, because I thought my self under great obligations to them for what they had done and would do if they could: but if they finally failed in their performance, and our partnership must be dissolved, I should then think myself at liberty to accept the assistance of my friends: thus the matter rested for some time; when I said to my partner, perhaps your father is dissatisfied at the part you have undertaken in this affair of ours, and is unwilling to advance for you and me what he would for you? If that is the case, tell me, and I will resign the whole to you, and go about my business. No, said he, my father has really been disappointed, and is really unable; and I am unwilling to distress him farther. I see this is a business I am not fit for. I was bred a farmer, and it was a folly in me to come to town and put myself, at thirty years of age, an apprentice to learn a new trade. Many of our Welsh people are going to settle in North Carolina, where land is cheap. I am inclined to go with them, and follow my old employment: you may find friends to assist you: if you will take the debts of the company upon you, return to my father the hundred pounds he has advanced, pay my little personal debts, and give me[Pg 84] thirty pounds and a new saddle, I will relinquish the partnership, and leave the whole in your hands. I agreed to this proposal; it was drawn up in writing, signed and sealed immediately. I gave him what he demanded, and he went soon after to Carolina; whence he sent me, next year, two long letters, containing the best account that had been given of that country, the climate, the soil, husbandry, &c., for in those matters he was very judicious: I printed them in the papers, and they gave great satisfaction to the public.

But now another unexpected difficulty arose. Mr. Meredith's father, who was supposed to cover the costs of our printing business, could only provide one hundred pounds, which had already been paid. Another hundred was owed to the merchant, who was growing impatient and took legal action against us all. We secured bail but realized that if we couldn't raise the money in time, the case would soon reach a judgment and execution, ruining our promising prospects, as the press and type would have to be sold for payment, possibly at half price.[Pg 83] In this distress, two true friends, whose kindness I will never forget, came to me separately, without knowing what the other was doing, and offered to lend me all the money I needed to take over the business myself, if that was possible. However, they weren't keen on me continuing the partnership with Meredith, who, as they said, was often seen drunk in the street and gambling in pubs, which was damaging to our reputation. These two friends were William Coleman and Robert Grace. I told them that I couldn’t suggest a separation while there was still hope of the Merediths fulfilling their part of our agreement because I felt very indebted to them for what they had done and what they might do if they could. But if they ultimately failed and we had to end our partnership, I would then feel free to accept my friends' help. The matter remained like this for a while, and then I mentioned to my partner that perhaps his father was unhappy with his role in our business and unwilling to provide what he would for him and me. If that's the case, let me know, and I'll step back and focus on my own work. No, he said, my father has genuinely been let down and truly can’t help; and I don’t want to burden him further. I see that this is a business I'm not cut out for. I was raised as a farmer, and it was foolish of me to come to the city at thirty years old and become an apprentice to learn a new skill. Many of our fellow Welsh people are heading to North Carolina, where land is inexpensive. I’m considering going with them and returning to my previous work. You could find friends to help you; if you take on the company’s debts, pay my father back the hundred pounds he advanced, settle my small personal debts, and give me[Pg 84] thirty pounds and a new saddle, I will give up the partnership and leave everything in your hands. I agreed to this proposal; it was put in writing, signed, and sealed immediately. I gave him what he asked for, and he soon left for Carolina, from where he sent me two lengthy letters the following year, providing the best account of that region, including the climate, soil, farming, etc., as he was very knowledgeable in those areas. I printed them in the papers, and they were very well-received by the public.

As soon as he was gone I recurred to my two friends; and because I would not give an unkind preference to either, I took half what each had offered, and I wanted, of one, and half of the other; paid off the company's debts, and went on with the business in my own name, advertising that the partnership was dissolved. I think this was in or about the year 1729.

As soon as he left, I turned to my two friends. Since I didn’t want to show favoritism to either of them, I accepted half of what each had offered, took part from one, and part from the other. I paid off the company’s debts and continued the business under my own name, announcing that the partnership was dissolved. I believe this was around the year 1729.

About this time there was a cry among the people for more paper money; only fifteen thousand pounds being extant in the province, and that soon to be sunk. The wealthy inhabitants opposed any addition, being against all currency, from the apprehension that it would depreciate, as it had done in New-England, to the injury of all creditors. We had discussed this point in our junto, where I was on the side of an addition; being persuaded that the first small sum, struck in 1723, had done much good by increasing the trade, employment, and number of inhabitants in the province; since I now saw all the old houses inhabited, and many new ones building; whereas I remembered well, when I first walked about the streets of Philadelphia (eating my roll), I saw many of the houses in Walnut-street, between Second and Front streets, with bills on their doors "to be let;" and many, likewise, in Chestnut-street and other streets which made me think the inhabitants of the city[Pg 85] were one after another deserting it. Our debates possessed me so fully of the subject, that I wrote and printed an anonymous pamphlet on it, entitled, "The Nature and Necessity of a Paper Currency." It was well received by the common people in general, but the rich men disliked it, for it increased and strengthened the clamour for more money; and they happening to have no writers among them that were able to answer it, their opposition slackened, and the point was carried by a majority in the house. My friends there, who considered I had been of some service, thought fit to reward me by employing me in printing the money; a very profitable job, and a great help to me; this was another advantage gained by my being able to write.

Around this time, there was a demand from the people for more paper money; only fifteen thousand pounds were in circulation in the province, and that amount was about to be depleted. The wealthy residents opposed any increase, fearing that it would lead to depreciation, just like it had in New England, harming all creditors. We discussed this issue in our group, where I supported the idea of an increase, believing that the initial small amount issued in 1723 had significantly benefited the trade, job opportunities, and population growth in the province. I now saw all the old houses occupied and many new ones being built. I vividly remembered when I first walked around the streets of Philadelphia (eating my roll), I noticed many houses on Walnut Street, between Second and Front Streets, with signs on their doors saying "to be let;" and many others on Chestnut Street and other streets that made me think the city's inhabitants[Pg 85] were leaving one by one. Our discussions consumed me to the point that I wrote and published an anonymous pamphlet titled "The Nature and Necessity of a Paper Currency." It was well-received by the general public, but the wealthy disliked it for it fueled the demand for more money; since they had no writers among them who could counter it, their opposition weakened, and the majority in the house supported the idea. My friends there, recognizing my contribution, decided to reward me by assigning me the task of printing the money; it was a lucrative job and a great help to me; this was another benefit of my writing skills.

The utility of this currency became by time and experience so evident, that the principles upon which it was founded were never afterward much disputed; so that it grew soon to fifty-five thousand pounds; and in 1739, to eighty thousand pounds, trade, building, and inhabitants all the while increasing: though I now think there are limits beyond which the quantity may be hurtful.

The usefulness of this currency became clear over time and through experience, so the principles it was based on were never really questioned afterward; it quickly grew to fifty-five thousand pounds, and by 1739, it reached eighty thousand pounds, with trade, construction, and population all increasing. However, I now believe there are limits beyond which the amount can be detrimental.

I soon after obtained, through my friend Hamilton, the printing of the Newcastle paper money, another profitable job, as I then thought it, small things appearing great to those in small circumstances: and these to me were really great advantages, as they were great encouragements. Mr. Hamilton procured me also the printing of the laws and votes of that government, which continued in my hands as long as I followed the business.

I soon got, through my friend Hamilton, the contract for printing Newcastle's paper money, which I thought was another good opportunity. Small successes seem big to those with limited means, and these were actually significant benefits for me because they provided great motivation. Mr. Hamilton also arranged for me to print the laws and votes of that government, which I continued to handle as long as I was in the business.

I now opened a small stationer's shop: I had in it blanks of all kinds, the correctest that ever appeared among us. I was assisted in that by my friend Breintnal: I had also paper, parchment, chapmen's books, &c. One Whitemash, a compositor I had known in London, an excellent workman, now came to me, and worked with me constantly and[Pg 86] diligently; and I took an apprentice, the son of Aquilla Rose.

I recently opened a small stationery shop. I stocked all kinds of blank items, the best that had ever been available to us. My friend Breintnal helped me with that. I also had paper, parchment, and ledgers, etc. A compositor named Whitemash, who I had known in London and was an excellent worker, joined me and worked with me regularly and[Pg 86] diligently. I also took on an apprentice, Aquilla Rose's son.

I began now gradually to pay off the debt I was under for the printing-house. In order to secure my credit and character as a tradesman, I took care not only to be in reality industrious and frugal, but to avoid the appearances to the contrary. I dressed plain, and was seen at no places of idle diversion: I never went out a fishing or shooting: a book, indeed, sometimes debauched me from my work, but that was seldom, was private, and gave no scandal: and to show that I was not above my business, I sometimes brought home the paper I purchased at the stores through the streets on a wheelbarrow. Thus, being esteemed an industrious, thriving young man, and paying duly for what I bought, the merchants who imported stationary solicited my custom; others proposed supplying me with books, and I went on prosperously. In the mean time Keimer's credit and business declining daily, he was at last forced to sell his printing-house to satisfy his creditors. He went to Barbadoes, and there lived some years in very poor circumstances.

I gradually started to pay off the debt I owed for the printing house. To maintain my reputation and credibility as a businessperson, I made sure not only to be genuinely hardworking and frugal, but also to avoid giving any impression to the contrary. I dressed plainly and stayed away from places of idle entertainment: I never went fishing or shooting. A book, indeed, sometimes distracted me from my work, but that was rare, private, and caused no gossip. To show that I was not above my job, I sometimes brought home the paper I bought from the stores in a wheelbarrow. As a result, I was regarded as a hardworking, successful young man, and I paid promptly for what I bought, which encouraged merchants who imported stationery to seek my business; others offered to supply me with books, and I continued to thrive. Meanwhile, Keimer’s credit and business were declining daily, and he was eventually forced to sell his printing house to satisfy his creditors. He moved to Barbados and lived there for several years in very poor conditions.

His apprentice, David Harry, whom I had instructed while I worked with him, set up in his place at Philadelphia, having bought his materials. I was at first apprehensive of a powerful rival in Harry, as his friends were very able, and had a good deal of interest: I therefore proposed a partnership to him, which he, fortunately for me, rejected with scorn. He was very proud, dressed like a gentleman, lived expensively, took much diversion and pleasure abroad, ran in debt, and neglected his business; upon which, all business left him; and, finding nothing to do, he followed Keimer to Barbadoes, taking the printing-house with him. There this apprentice employed his former master as a journeyman; they quarrelled often, and Harry went continually behindhand, and at length was obliged to sell[Pg 87] his types and return to country-work in Pennsylvania. The person who bought them employed Keimer to use them, but a few years after he died.

His apprentice, David Harry, whom I had trained while I worked with him, set up shop in Philadelphia after purchasing his materials. At first, I worried that Harry would become a strong competitor since his friends were quite capable and had good connections. So, I suggested a partnership to him, which he, fortunately for me, rejected with disdain. He was very proud, dressed like a gentleman, lived lavishly, indulged in entertainment, got heavily into debt, and neglected his business. Because of this, all his work dried up, and with nothing to do, he followed Keimer to Barbados, taking the printing press with him. There, this apprentice employed his former master as a journeyman; they often argued, and Harry continuously fell behind in his work, eventually forced to sell[Pg 87] his types and return to country work in Pennsylvania. The person who bought them had Keimer use them, but a few years later, he passed away.

There remained now no other printer in Philadelphia but the old Bradford; but he was rich and easy, did a little in the business by straggling hands, but was not anxious about it: however, as he held the postoffice, it was imagined he had better opportunities of obtaining news, his paper was thought a better distributor of advertisements than mine, and therefore had many more; which was a profitable thing to him, and a disadvantage to me. For though I did indeed receive and send papers by the post, yet the public opinion was otherwise; for what I did send was by bribing the riders, who took them privately; Bradford being unkind enough to forbid it, which occasioned some resentment on my part, and I thought so meanly of the practice, that, when I afterward came into his situation, I took care never to imitate it.

There was no other printer left in Philadelphia except for old Bradford. He was wealthy and relaxed, doing a bit of business through random workers, but he didn’t stress about it. However, since he ran the post office, people believed he had better access to news; his paper was seen as a better platform for advertisements than mine, giving him a significant advantage and putting me at a disadvantage. Although I did send and receive papers through the mail, public perception was different. The papers I sent were delivered by bribing the riders, who took them secretly, while Bradford was inconsiderate enough to prohibit this, which made me resentful. I thought so poorly of that practice that when I eventually found myself in his position, I made sure never to repeat it.

I had hitherto continued to board with Godfrey, who lived in part of my house with his wife and children, and had one side of the shop for his glazier's business, though he worked little, being always absorbed in his mathematics. Mrs. Godfrey projected a match for me with a relation's daughter, took opportunities of bringing us often together, till a serious courtship on my part ensued, the girl being in herself very deserving. The old folks encouraged me by continual invitations to supper, and by leaving us together, till at length it was time to explain. Mrs. Godfrey managed our little treaty. I let her know that I expected as much money with their daughter as would pay off my remaining debt for the printing-house; which I believe was not then above a hundred pounds. She brought me word they had no such sum to spare: I said they might mortgage their house in the loan office. The answer to this after some days was, that they did not approve the[Pg 88] match; that, on inquiry of Bradford, they had been informed the printing business was not a profitable one; the types would soon be worn out, and more wanted; that Keimer and David Harry had failed one after the other, and I should probably soon follow them; and, therefore, I was forbidden the house, and the daughter shut up. Whether this was a real change of sentiment, or only artifice on a supposition of our being too far engaged in affection to retract, and therefore that we should steal a marriage, which would leave them at liberty to give or withhold what they pleased, I know not. But I suspected the motive, resented it, and went no more. Mrs. Godfrey brought me afterward some more favourable accounts of their disposition, and would have drawn me on again; but I declared absolutely my resolution to have nothing more to do with that family. This was resented by the Godfreys; we differed, and they removed, leaving me the whole house, and I resolved to take no more inmates. But this affair having turned my thoughts to marriage, I looked round me and made overtures of acquaintance in other places; but soon found that the business of a printer being generally thought a poor one, I was not to expect money with a wife, unless with such a one as I should not otherwise think agreeable.

I had been staying with Godfrey, who lived in part of my house with his wife and kids, and used one side of the shop for his glazing business, though he hardly worked since he was always focused on his math. Mrs. Godfrey was trying to set me up with a relative's daughter and often created chances for us to spend time together, leading to a serious courtship on my part, as the girl was quite wonderful. The older folks encouraged me with constant supper invitations and by leaving us alone together until it was finally time to discuss things. Mrs. Godfrey handled our little agreement. I mentioned that I expected a dowry with their daughter that would cover my remaining debt for the printing house, which I believed was only about a hundred pounds at the time. She told me they couldn’t come up with that amount. I suggested they could mortgage their house at the loan office. After a few days, I got the response that they didn’t approve of the match; after asking Bradford, they had learned that the printing business wasn’t profitable, that the types would wear out quickly and I’d need more, and that Keimer and David Harry had both failed one after the other, so I would likely fail as well. Therefore, I was forbidden from the house, and the daughter was locked away. Whether this was a genuine change of heart or just a tactic because they thought we were too emotionally invested to back out and might elope, giving them freedom to offer or deny what they wanted, I don’t know. But I suspected their motives, felt resentful, and stopped visiting. Mrs. Godfrey later brought me some more encouraging news about their feelings and tried to draw me back in, but I firmly stated that I wanted nothing more to do with that family. The Godfreys took this badly; we argued, and they moved out, leaving me with the whole house, after which I decided not to take in any more boarders. However, this situation made me consider marriage, so I started looking around for other acquaintances; but I quickly discovered that since being a printer was generally seen as a poor profession, I shouldn't expect any dowry with a wife unless it was with someone I wouldn't find appealing otherwise.

A friendly correspondence, as neighbours, had continued between me and Miss Read's family, who all had a regard for me from the time of my first lodging in their house. I was often invited there, and consulted in their affairs, wherein I sometimes was of service. I pitied poor Miss Read's unfortunate situation, who was generally dejected, seldom cheerful, and avoided company: I considered my giddiness and inconstancy when in London, as in a great degree the cause of her unhappiness, though the mother was good enough to think the fault more her own than mine, as she had prevented our marrying[Pg 89] before I went thither, and persuaded the other match in my absence. Our mutual affection was revived, but there was now great objections to our union; that match was indeed looked upon as invalid, a preceding wife being said to be living in England; but this could not easily be proved, because of the distance, &c., and though there was a report of his death, it was not certain. Then, though it should be true, he had left many debts which his successor might be called upon to pay: we ventured, however, over all these difficulties, and I took her to wife, Sept. 1, 1730. None of the inconveniences happened that we had apprehended; she proved a good and faithful helpmate, assisted me much by attending to the shop; we throve together, and ever mutually endeavoured to make each other happy. Thus I corrected that great erratum as well as I could.

A friendly relationship, as neighbors, continued between me and Miss Read's family, who had all cared for me since I first stayed at their house. I was frequently invited over and consulted on their matters, where I sometimes offered helpful advice. I felt sorry for Miss Read's unfortunate situation; she was usually downcast, rarely cheerful, and avoided social gatherings. I considered my carelessness and inconsistency during my time in London to be a major reason for her unhappiness, although her mother was gracious enough to believe the fault was more hers than mine, since she had blocked our marriage[Pg 89] before I left and encouraged another match while I was gone. Our mutual affection was rekindled, but there were now significant issues regarding our union; that match was indeed seen as invalid, as a previous husband was said to be living in England. However, proving this was difficult due to the distance, and although there were rumors of his death, it wasn't certain. Even if it were true, he had left many debts that his successor might be responsible for. We decided to push through all these obstacles, and I married her on September 1, 1730. None of the inconveniences we feared occurred; she turned out to be a good and loyal partner, helping me a lot by taking care of the shop. We prospered together and constantly worked to make each other happy. In this way, I tried to correct that significant erratum as best as I could.

About this time our club, meeting, not at a tavern, but in a little room of Mr. Grace's set apart for that purpose, a proposition was made by me, that, since our books were often referred to in our disquisitions upon the queries, it might be convenient to us to have them all together when we met, that, upon occasion, they might be consulted; and by thus clubbing our books to a common library, we should, while we liked to keep them together, have each of us the advantage of using the books of all the other members, which would be nearly as beneficial as if each owned the whole. It was liked and agreed to, and we filled one end of the room with such books as we could best spare. The number was not so great as we expected; and though they had been of great use, yet some inconveniences occurring for want of due care of them, the collection, after about a year, was separated, and each took his books home again.

Around this time, our club was meeting not at a bar, but in a small room belonging to Mr. Grace, set aside for our gatherings. I suggested that since we often referenced our books during discussions, it would be useful to have them all together when we met so we could consult them as needed. By combining our books into a shared library, we could enjoy the benefits of using each other’s books, which would be almost as advantageous as owning the entire collection ourselves. Everyone liked the idea, and we filled one end of the room with the books we could spare. The number wasn’t as large as we had hoped, and although they had been quite helpful, some issues arose due to a lack of proper care. After about a year, we decided to disband the collection, and everyone took their books home again.

And now I set on foot my first project of a public nature, that for a subscription library; I drew up[Pg 90] the proposals, got them put into form by our great scrivener, Brockden, and, by the help of my friends in the junto, procured fifty subscribers of forty shillings each to begin with, and ten shillings a year for fifty years, the term our company was to continue. We afterward obtained a charter, the company being increased to one hundred; this was the mother of all the North American subscription libraries, now so numerous. It is become a great thing itself, and continually goes on increasing: these libraries have improved the general conversation of the Americans, made the common tradesmen and farmers as intelligent as most gentlemen from other countries, and perhaps have contributed in some degree to the stand so generally made throughout the colonies in defence of their privileges.

And now I started my first public project, a subscription library. I drafted the proposals, had them formalized by our talented scribe, Brockden, and, with the help of my friends in the junto, secured fifty subscribers at forty shillings each to kick things off, plus ten shillings a year for fifty years, which was the duration our organization would operate. We later obtained a charter, increasing the company to one hundred members; this became the first of all North American subscription libraries, which are now so prevalent. It has grown substantially and continues to expand: these libraries have enhanced the general conversation among Americans, making everyday tradespeople and farmers as knowledgeable as many gentlemen from other countries, and may have even played a role in the widespread resistance throughout the colonies in defense of their rights.

[Thus far was written with the intention expressed in the beginning; and, getting abroad, it excited great interest on account of its simplicity and candour; and induced many applications for a continuance. What follows was written many years after, in compliance with the advice contained in the letters that follow, and has, therefore, less of a family picture and more of a public character. The American revolution occasioned the interruption.]

[Thus far was written with the intention expressed in the beginning; and, once published, it generated a lot of interest due to its simplicity and honesty, leading to many requests for more. What follows was written many years later, in response to the advice given in the letters that come next, and therefore has less of a family feel and more of a public nature. The American Revolution caused the interruption.]

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Dr. Shipley.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Dr. Shipley.

[2] Perhaps from the time when the name of Franklin, which before was the name of an order of people, was assumed by them for a surname, when others took surnames all over the kingdom.

[2] Maybe from the time when the name Franklin, which previously referred to a social class, was adopted by them as a last name, while others were adopting last names throughout the kingdom.

As a proof that Franklin was anciently the common name of an order or rank in England, see Judge Fortescue, De laudibus Legum Angliæ, written about the year 1412, in which is the following passage, to show that good juries might easily be formed in any part of England:

As evidence that "Franklin" was historically a common name for a status or rank in England, refer to Judge Fortescue's De laudibus Legum Angliæ, written around the year 1412, which includes the following passage to demonstrate that good juries could easily be assembled in any part of England:

"Regio etiam illa, ita respersa refertaque est possessoribus terrarum et agrorum, quod in ea, villula tam parva reperiri non poterit, in qua non est miles, armiger, vel pater-familias, qualis ibidem Frankleri vulgariter nuncupatur, magnis ditatus possessionibus, nec non libere tenentes et alii valecti plurimi, suis patrimoniis sufficientes, ad faciendum juratam, in forma prænotata.

"That region is so scattered and filled with landowners and farmers that you won’t find even a tiny villa where there isn’t a knight, esquire, or head of a household, commonly referred to there as Frankleri, who is wealthy with large estates, as well as many freeholders and numerous other vassals, all sufficiently well-off to take the oath as specified."

"Moreover, the same country is so filled and replenished with landed menne, that therein so small a thorpe cannot be found wherein dweleth not a knight, an esquire, or such a householder as is there commonly called a Franklin, enriched with great possessions; and also other freeholders and many yeomen, able for their livelihoodes to make a jury in form aforementioned."—Old Translation.

"Moreover, the same country is so filled with landed gentry that you can't find even a small village where there isn't a knight, an esquire, or a wealthy landowner known as a Franklin, enriched with substantial possessions; as well as other freeholders and many yeomen, capable of serving on a jury as mentioned earlier."—Old Translation.

Chaucer, too, calls his country-gentleman a Franklin; and after describing his good housekeeping, thus characterizes him:

Chaucer also refers to his country gentleman as a Franklin; and after detailing his excellent housekeeping, he describes him like this:

"This respectable Franklin carried a silk purse
Attached to his belt, as white as morning milk; Knight of the county, first judge at the trial,
To assist the poor and to offer guidance to those who are uncertain. In all his jobs, he was generous and fair,
"Famed for kindness, loved by everyone."

Copy of an original letter, found among Dr. Franklin's papers, from Josiah to B. Franklin.

Copy of an original letter, found among Dr. Franklin's papers, from Josiah to B. Franklin.

Boston, May 26, 1739.

Boston, May 26, 1739.

Loving Son,—As to the original of our name there is various opinions; some say that it came from a sort of title of which a book, that you bought when here, gives a lively account. Some think we are of a French extract, which was formerly called Franks; some of a free line; a line free from that vassalage which was common to subjects in days of old; some from a bird of long red legs. Your uncle Benjamin made inquiry of one skilled in heraldry, who told him there is two coats of armour, one belonging to the Franklins of the north, and one to the Franklins of the west. However, our circumstances have been such as that it hath hardly been worth while to concern ourselves much about these things, any farther than to tickle the fancy a little.

Dear Son,—There are various opinions about the origin of our name. Some people say it comes from a title described in a book you bought when you were here. Others think we have French roots and were once called Franks; some believe we come from a free lineage that wasn’t subjected to the servitude common in ancient times; and some think it's named after a bird with long red legs. Your uncle Benjamin asked an expert in heraldry, who told him there are two coats of arms, one for the Franklins of the north and one for the Franklins of the west. However, our circumstances haven’t really made it worth our while to investigate these matters deeply, aside from a bit of entertainment.

The first that I can give account of is my great grandfather, as it was a custom in those days among young men too many times to goe to seek their fortune, and in his travels he went upon liking to a taylor; but he kept such a stingy house, that he left him and travelled farther, and came to a smith's house, and coming on a fasting day, being in popish times, he did not like there the first day; the next morning the servant was called up at five in the morning, but after a little time came a good toast and good beer, and he found good housekeeping there; he served and learned the trade of a smith.

The first person I want to tell you about is my great-grandfather. In his time, it was common for young men to go out in search of fortune. During his travels, he worked as a tailor, but he found the place he was staying too stingy, so he left and continued on. He ended up at a blacksmith's, and at first, he didn’t like it there because it was a fasting day during the Catholic period. The next morning, the servant was called at five o'clock, and after a little while, he was served some good toast and decent beer. He discovered that the household was well-managed and ended up working there while learning the blacksmith trade.

In Queen Mary's days, either his wife, or my grandmother by father's side, informed my father that they kept their Bible fastened under the top of a joint-stool that they might turn up the book and read in the Bible; that, when anybody came to the dore, they turned up the stool for fear of the apparitor; for if it was discovered they would be in hazard of their lives. My grandfather was a smith also, and settled at Ecton, in Northamptonshire, and he was imprisoned a year and a day on suspicion of his being the author of some poetry that touched the character of some great man. He had only one son and one daughter; my grandfather's name was Henry, my father's name was Thomas, my mother's name was Jane. My father was born at Ecton or Eton, Northamptonshire, on the 18th of October, 1598; married to Miss Jane White, niece to Coll White, of Banbury, and died in the 84th year of his age. There was nine children of us who were happy in our parents, who took great care by their instructions and pious example to breed us up in a religious way. My eldest brother had but one child, which was married to one Mr. Fisher, at Wallingborough, in Northamptonshire. The town was lately burned down, and whether she was a sufferer or not I cannot tell, or whether she be living or not. Her father died worth fifteen hundred pounds, but what her circumstances are now I know not. She hath no child. If you by the freedom of your office, makes it more likely to convey a letter to her, it would be acceptable to me. There is also children of brother John and sister Morris, but I hear no thing from them, and they write not to me, so that I know not where to find them. I have been again to about seeing ... but have missed of being informed. We received yours, and are glad to hear poor Jammy is recovered so well. Son John received the letter, but is so busy just now that he cannot write you an answer, but will do the best he can. Now with hearty love to, and prayer for you all, I rest your affectionate father,

During Queen Mary's reign, either his wife or my paternal grandmother told my father that they kept their Bible hidden under the top of a joint stool so they could read it. Whenever someone knocked at the door, they would flip the stool over to hide it from the apparitor, since being caught could risk their lives. My grandfather was also a blacksmith and settled in Ecton, Northamptonshire. He was imprisoned for a year and a day because they suspected he might have written poetry that criticized an important figure. He had one son and one daughter; my grandfather's name was Henry, my father's name was Thomas, and my mother's name was Jane. My father was born in Ecton or Eton, Northamptonshire, on October 18, 1598; he married Miss Jane White, who was the niece of Coll White from Banbury, and he died at 84. There were nine of us children who were fortunate to have parents that cared for us by teaching us and setting a good example, raising us with religious values. My eldest brother had one child, who married Mr. Fisher in Wellingborough, Northamptonshire. The town has recently burned down, and I’m unsure if she was affected or if she is still alive. Her father passed away with fifteen hundred pounds, but I don’t know her current situation. She has no children. If it's easier for you to send her a letter, I would appreciate it. There are also the children of my brother John and sister Morris, but I haven’t heard from them, and they don’t write to me, so I'm not sure where to find them. I've tried to get information again, but haven’t been able to. We received your letter and are glad to hear that poor Jammy has recovered so well. Son John got the letter, but he’s very busy right now and can’t reply, though he will do his best. Now, with all my love and prayers for you all, I remain your affectionate father.

JOSIAH FRANKLIN.

JOSIAH FRANKLIN.

[4] Sherburne, in the island of Nantucket.

[4] Sherburne, on the island of Nantucket.

[5] The number in 1817 exceeds 400

[5] The number in 1817 is over 400.

"Silence, ye wolves, while Ralph to Cynthia howls,
And makes night hideous: answer him, ye owls!"

"Be quiet, you wolves, while Ralph howls to Cynthia,
And makes the night terrible: respond to him, you owls!"

Pope's Dunciad, b. iii., v. 165.

Pope's Dunciad, b. 3, v. 165.

[7] F. R. S., author of "A View of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy," and "A Treatise on Chymistry;" died in 1771.

[7] F. R. S., author of "A View of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy" and "A Treatise on Chemistry," passed away in 1771.

[8] A printing-house is always called a chapel by the workmen, because printing was first carried on in England in an ancient chapel, and the title has been preserved by tradition. The bien venu among the printers, answers to the terms entrance and footing among mechanics; thus a journeyman, on entering a printing-house, was accustomed to pay one or more gallons of beer for the good of the chapel; this custom was falling into disuse thirty years ago; it is very properly rejected entirely in the United States.

[8] A printing house is always referred to as a chapel by the workers because printing first began in England in an old chapel, and the name has been kept as a tradition. The bien venu among printers corresponds to the terms entrance and footing used by craftsmen; so when a journeyman entered a printing house, he was expected to pay for one or more gallons of beer for the good of the chapel; this practice was becoming less common thirty years ago and is completely rejected in the United States.

[9] I afterward obtained for his son five hundred pounds.

[9] Later, I got five hundred pounds for his son.


PART II.

From Mr. Abel James (received in Paris).

From Mr. Abel James (received in Paris).

"My dear and honoured Friend,

"My dear and respected Friend,

"I have often been desirous of writing to thee, but could not be reconciled to the thought that the letter might fall into the hands of the British, lest some printer or busybody should publish some part of the contents, and give our friend pain and myself censure.

"I've often wanted to write to you, but I couldn't shake the worry that my letter might get into British hands, especially if some printer or nosy person decided to publish parts of it, causing distress to our friend and criticism for me."

"Some time since there fell into my hands, to my great joy, about twenty-three sheets in thy own handwriting, containing an account of the parentage and life of thyself, directed to thy son, ending in the year 1730, with which there were notes, likewise in thy writing; a copy of which I enclose, in hopes it may be a means, if thou continued it up to a later period, that the first and latter part may be put together; and if it is not yet continued, I hope thee will not delay it. Life is uncertain, as the preacher tells us; and what will the world say, if kind, humane, and benevolent Ben Franklin should leave his friends and the world deprived of so pleasing and profitable a work; a work which would be useful and entertaining not only to a few, but to millions? The influence writings under that class have on the minds of youth is very great, and has nowhere appeared to me so plain as in our public friend's journals. It almost insensibly leads the youth into the resolution of endeavouring to become as good and eminent as the journalist. Should thine, for instance, when published (and I think they could not fail of it), lead the youth to equal the industry and temperance of thy early youth, what a blessing[Pg 92] with that class would such a work be! I know of no character living, nor many of them put together, who has so much in his power as thyself to promote a greater spirit of industry and early attention to business, frugality, and temperance, with the American youth. Not that I think the work would have no other merit and use in the world; far from it: but the first is of such vast importance, that I know nothing that can equal it."

"Some time ago, I was excited to receive about twenty-three sheets in your own handwriting, detailing your background and life, addressed to your son and ending in the year 1730. Along with that, there were notes, also in your handwriting; I’m enclosing a copy, hoping that if you continue it to a later date, the beginning and the later parts can be combined. If you haven't continued it yet, I hope you won't delay any longer. Life is unpredictable, as the preacher reminds us; what will people think if kind, caring, and generous Ben Franklin leaves his friends and the world without such a wonderful and useful work? A work that wouldn’t just be beneficial but also entertaining to millions, not just a few. The influence that writings like this have on young people's minds is enormous, and I've never seen it as clearly as in our public friend's journals. It almost effortlessly inspires the youth to strive to be as good and distinguished as the writer. If yours, for instance, when published (which I truly believe it will be), encourages young people to emulate the hard work and self-discipline of your early years, what a blessing that would be for that generation! I don’t know anyone alive, or even collectively, who has as much power as you do to promote a greater spirit of hard work, early dedication to their pursuits, thriftiness, and self-discipline among American youth. Not that I think the work wouldn’t have other merits and purposes; far from it. However, the first is so tremendously important that I can’t think of anything that could match it."

The foregoing letter, and the minutes accompanying it, being shown to a friend, I received from him the following:

The letter above, along with the minutes that came with it, was shared with a friend, and I received the following response from him:

From Mr. Benjamin Vaughan.

From Mr. Benjamin Vaughan.

"Paris, January 31, 1783.

"Paris, January 31, 1783."

"My dearest Sir,

"My dearest Sir,

"When I had read over your sheets of minutes of the principal incidents of your life, recovered for you by your Quaker acquaintance, I told you I would send you a letter expressing my reasons why I thought it would be useful to complete and publish it as he desired. Various concerns have, for some time past, prevented this letter being written, and I do not know whether it was worth any expectation; happening to be at leisure, however, at present, I shall, by writing, at least interest and instruct myself; but as the terms I am inclined to use may tend to offend a person of your manners, I shall only tell you how I would address any other person who was as good and as great as yourself, but less diffident. I would say to him, sir, I solicit the history of your life, from the following motives:

"When I went through your notes on the significant moments in your life, which your Quaker friend put together for you, I mentioned that I would write to you about why I believe it's important to complete and publish it as he suggested. Various things have kept me from writing this letter for a while, and I'm unsure if it was worth the wait; however, since I have some free time now, I'll at least engage and enlighten myself by writing. But since my way of expressing myself might offend someone as sensitive as you, I'll explain how I would address anyone else who is as good and distinguished as you, but less humble. I would say to him, sir, I seek the story of your life for the following reasons:

"Your history is so remarkable, that, if you do not give it, somebody else will most certainly give it; and perhaps so as nearly to do as much harm as your own management of the thing might do good.

"Your history is so impressive that if you don't share it, someone else certainly will. And they might present it in a way that could do as much harm as your own handling could do good."

"It will, morever, present a table of the internal circumstances of your country, which will very much tend to invite to it settlers of virtuous and manly[Pg 93] minds. And, considering the eagerness with which such information is sought by them, and the extent of your reputation, I do not know of a more efficacious advertisement than your biography would give.

"It will also create a overview of the internal conditions of your country, likely attracting settlers with strong and virtuous minds. Given how eager they are for this information and the extent of your reputation, I can't think of a better way to promote your country than through your biography."

"All that has happened to you is also connected with the detail of the manners and situation of a rising people; and in this respect I do not think that the writings of Cæsar and Tacitus can be more interesting to a true judge of human nature and society.

"Everything that has happened to you is also connected to the details of the customs and circumstances of a rising people; and in this context, I believe that the writings of Caesar and Tacitus can't be more fascinating to someone who truly understands human nature and society."

"But these, sir, are small reasons, in my opinion, compared with the chance which your life will give for the forming of future great men; and, in conjunction with your Art of Virtue (which you design to publish), of improving the features of private character, and, consequently, of aiding all happiness, both public and domestic.

"But these, sir, are minor reasons, in my view, when you consider the potential your life will have for inspiring future great leaders; and, along with your Art of Virtue (which you plan to publish), for enhancing the qualities of personal character, and thus promoting happiness in both public and private life."

"The two works I allude to, sir, will, in particular, give a noble rule and example of self-education. School and other education constantly proceed upon false principles, and show a clumsy apparatus pointed at a false mark; but your apparatus is simple, and the mark a true one; and while parents and young persons are left destitute of other just means of estimating and becoming prepared for a reasonable course in life, your discovery, that the thing is in many a man's private power, will be invaluable!

"The two works I'm talking about, sir, will particularly offer a great example and guideline for self-education. Schools and other educational systems often rely on misleading principles and show a clumsy setup aimed at the wrong goals; but your approach is straightforward, and the goal is a valid one. While parents and young people often lack proper paths to assess and prepare for a sensible life, your discovery—that this is within many people's personal control—will be incredibly useful!"

"Influence upon the private character, late in life, is not only an influence late in life, but a weak influence. It is in youth that we plant our chief habits and prejudices; it is in youth that we take our party as to profession, pursuits, and matrimony. In youth, therefore, the turn is given; in youth the education even of the next generation is given; in youth the private and public character is determined; and the term of life extending but from youth to age, life ought to begin well from youth; and more especially before we take our party as to our principal objects.[Pg 94]

"Influence on personal character later in life isn't just late influence; it's a weak influence. It's in youth that we set our primary habits and biases; it's in youth that we choose our professional paths, hobbies, and life partners. Therefore, the direction is set in youth; it’s in youth that we shape the education of the next generation; it’s in youth that both private and public character are formed; and since life spans from youth to old age, it should start strongly during youth, especially before we determine our main goals.[Pg 94]

"But your biography will not merely teach self-education, but the education of a wise man; and the wisest man will receive lights and improve his progress by seeing detailed the conduct of another wise man. And why are weaker men to be deprived of such helps, when we see our race has been blundering on in the dark, almost without a guide in this particular, from the farthest trace of time? Show then, sir, how much is to be done, both to sons and fathers; and invite all wise men to become like yourself, and other men to become wise.

"But your biography won't just teach self-education; it will also educate a wise man. Even the wisest individual can gain insights and enhance their growth by observing the detailed actions of another wise person. Why should those who are less capable be denied such support, especially when we've seen humanity stumbling in the dark, nearly without guidance, for ages? So, please, show how much work there is to do, for both sons and fathers; and encourage all wise individuals to be like you, and others to strive towards wisdom."

"When we see how cruel statesmen and warriors can be to the human race, and how absurd distinguished men can be to their acquaintance, it will be instructive to observe the instances multiply of pacific, acquiescing manners; and to find how compatible it is to be great and domestic; enviable and yet good-humoured.

"When we notice how harsh politicians and soldiers can be towards humanity, and how ridiculous prominent figures can be with their friends, it becomes enlightening to see the increasing examples of peaceful and agreeable behavior; and to discover how being great can coexist with being down-to-earth; admirable yet easygoing.

"The little private incidents which you will also have to relate, will have considerable use, as we want, above all things, rules of prudence in ordinary affairs; and it will be curious to see how you have acted in these. It will be so far a sort of key to life, and explain many things that all men ought to have once explained to them, to give them a chance of becoming wise by foresight.

"The small personal experiences you’ll need to share will be quite valuable, as we primarily seek guidelines for caution in everyday matters; and it will be interesting to see how you've handled these situations. In a way, it will serve as a kind of guide to life and clarify many things that everyone should have explained to them at least once, giving them an opportunity to gain wisdom through foresight."

"The nearest thing to having experience of one's own, is to have other people's affairs brought before us in a shape that is interesting; this is sure to happen from your pen. Your affairs and management will have an air of simplicity or importance that will not fail to strike; and I am convinced you have conducted them with as much originality as if you had been conducting discussions in politics or philosophy; and what more worthy of experiments and system (its importance and its errors considered) than human life!

"The closest thing to having our own experiences is seeing other people's lives presented in an engaging way; this is definitely what your writing does. Your situations and management will have an aura of simplicity or significance that is sure to grab attention, and I'm convinced you've handled them with as much creativity as if you were debating politics or philosophy. What could be more worthy of exploration and organization (considering its significance and its mistakes) than human life!"

"Some men have been virtuous blindly, others have speculated fantastically, and others have been[Pg 95] shrewd to bad purposes; but you, sir, I am sure, will give, under your hand, nothing but what is at the same moment wise, practical, and good.

"Some men have acted virtuously without thinking, others have imagined wildly, and some have been[Pg 95] clever for negative reasons; but you, sir, I’m sure, will only provide, with your own hand, what is both wise, practical, and good."

"Your account of yourself (for I suppose the parallel I am drawing for Dr. Franklin will hold not only in point of character, but of private history) will show that you are ashamed of no origin; a thing the more important as you prove how little necessary all origin is to happiness, virtue, or greatness.

"Your account of yourself (since I assume the comparison I’m making for Dr. Franklin applies not only to character but also to personal history) will show that you are not ashamed of any background; this is especially significant as you demonstrate how little background matters for happiness, virtue, or greatness."

"As no end, likewise, happens without a means, so we shall find, sir, that even you yourself framed a plan by which you became considerable; but, at the same time, we may see that, though the event is flattering, the means are as simple as wisdom could make them; that is, depending upon nature, virtue, thought, and habit.

"As no outcome occurs without a method, we will discover, sir, that you also created a strategy that made you significant; however, we can see that, although the result is impressive, the methods are as straightforward as wisdom can make them; that is, relying on nature, virtue, thought, and habit."

"Another thing demonstrated will be the propriety of every man's waiting for his time for appearing upon the stage of the world. Our sensations being very much fixed to the moment, we are apt to forget that more moments are to follow the first, and, consequently, that man should arrange his conduct so as to suit the whole of a life. Your attribution appears to have been applied to your life, and the passing moments of it have been enlivened with content and enjoyment, instead of being tormented with foolish impatience or regrets. Such a conduct is easy for those who make virtue and themselves their standard, and who try to keep themselves in countenance by examples of other truly great men, of whom patience is so often the characteristic.

"Another thing that will be shown is the importance of everyone waiting for their time to enter the world stage. Our feelings are often focused on the present moment, so we tend to forget that more moments will come after the first, and as a result, people should plan their actions to fit the entirety of their lives. Your actions seem to have been aligned with your life, and the moments have been filled with satisfaction and joy, rather than being troubled by silly impatience or regrets. This kind of behavior is easier for those who consider virtue and themselves as their benchmarks, and who try to maintain their composure by looking to examples of truly great individuals, for whom patience is often a defining trait."

"Your Quaker correspondent, sir (for here again I will suppose the subject of my letter to resemble Dr. Franklin), praised your frugality, diligence, and temperance, which he considered as a pattern for all youth: but it is singular that he should have forgotten your modesty and your disinterestedness, without which you never could have waited for your[Pg 96] advancement, or found your situation in the mean time comfortable; which is a strong lesson to show the poverty of glory, and the importance of regulating our minds.

"Your Quaker correspondent, sir (for once again I will liken the subject of my letter to Dr. Franklin), praised your frugality, hard work, and self-control, which he viewed as a model for all young people: but it’s odd that he overlooked your humility and selflessness, without which you could never have patiently awaited your[Pg 96] advancement, or found comfort in your situation in the meantime; this serves as a powerful reminder of the emptiness of fame and the importance of managing our thoughts."

"If this correspondent had known the nature of your reputation as well as I do, he would have said, your former writings and measures would secure attention to your Biography and Art of Virtue; and your Biography and Art of Virtue, in return, would secure attention to them. This is an advantage attendant upon a various character, and which brings all that belongs to it into greater play; and it is the more useful, as, perhaps, more persons are at a loss for the means of improving their minds and characters than they are for the time or the inclination to do it.

"If this writer had understood your reputation as well as I do, he would have said that your past works and efforts would draw attention to your Biography and Art of Virtue; and in turn, your Biography and Art of Virtue would attract attention to those works. This is a benefit that comes with a diverse character, bringing everything related to it into greater focus; and it's even more helpful, since maybe more people struggle to find the means to improve their minds and character than they do to find the time or motivation to actually do it."

"But there is one concluding reflection, sir, that will show the use of your life as a mere piece of biography. This style of writing seems a little gone out of vogue, and yet it is a very useful one; and your specimen of it may be particularly serviceable, as it will make a subject of comparison with the lives of various public cutthroats and intriguers, and with absurd monastic self-tormentors or vain literary triflers. If it encourages more writings of the same kind with your own, and induces more men to spend lives fit to be written, it will be worth all Plutarch's Lives put together.

"But there's one final thought, sir, that will highlight the value of your life as just another biography. This way of writing seems a bit out of style, but it's still quite useful; your example could be particularly helpful, as it will allow for comparisons with the lives of various public villains and schemers, as well as foolish monastic self-punishers or empty literary amateurs. If it inspires more writings like yours and encourages more people to live lives worth documenting, it will be more valuable than all of Plutarch's Lives combined."

"But being tired of figuring to myself a character of which every figure suits only one man in the world, without giving him the praise of it, I shall end my letter, my dear Dr. Franklin, with a personal application to your proper self.

"But being tired of trying to figure out a character that only fits one person in the world, without giving him credit for it, I will conclude my letter, my dear Dr. Franklin, with a personal appeal to you."

"I am earnestly desirous, then, my dear sir, that you should let the world into the traits of your genuine character, as civil broils may otherwise tend to disguise or traduce it. Considering your great age, the caution of your character, and your peculiar style of thinking, it is not likely that any one besides[Pg 97] yourself can be sufficiently master of the facts of your life or the intentions of your mind.

"I truly hope, dear sir, that you will allow the world to see the true aspects of your character, as public disputes may hide or misrepresent it. Given your advanced age, your careful nature, and your unique way of thinking, it’s unlikely that anyone but [Pg 97] you can fully grasp the details of your life or the intentions behind your thoughts."

"Besides all this, the immense revolution of the present period will necessarily turn our attention towards the author of it; and when virtuous principles have been pretended in it, it will be highly important to show that such have really influenced; and, as your own character will be the principal one to receive a scrutiny, it is proper (even for its effects upon your vast and rising country, as well as upon England and upon Europe) that it should stand respectable and eternal. For the furtherance of human happiness, I have always maintained that it is necessary to prove that man is not even at present a vicious and detestable animal; and still more to prove that good management may greatly amend him; and it is for much the same reason that I am anxious to see the opinion established, that there are fair characters among the individuals of the race; for the moment that all men, without exception, shall be conceived abandoned, good people will cease efforts deemed to be hopeless, and, perhaps, think of taking their share in the scramble of life, or, at least, of making it comfortable principally for themselves.

"Along with everything else, the major changes happening right now will inevitably make us look at the people driving them; and when they claim to act on virtuous principles, it’s crucial to show that those principles genuinely have had an influence. Since your character will be the main one under scrutiny, it’s important (both for its impact on your vast and emerging nation, and on England and Europe) that it remains respected and enduring. For the sake of human happiness, I've always argued that we need to demonstrate that people aren't inherently bad or detestable; and even more so, we need to show that effective management can significantly improve them. That’s also why I’m eager to see the belief established that there are good individuals among humanity; because the moment all men are seen as hopelessly lost, decent people will stop trying, thinking it’s pointless, and might instead just focus on making life comfortable primarily for themselves."

"Take then, my dear sir, this work most speedily into hand: show yourself good as you are good; temperate as you are temperate; and, above all things, prove yourself as one who, from your infancy, have loved justice, liberty, and concord, in a way that has made it natural and consistent for you to act as we have seen you act in the last seventeen years of your life. Let Englishmen be made not only to respect, but even to love you. When they think well of individuals in your native country, they will go nearer to thinking well of your country; and when your countrymen see themselves thought well of by Englishmen, they will go nearer to thinking well of England. Extend[Pg 98] your views even farther; do not stop at those who speak the English tongue, but, after having settled so many points in nature and politics, think of bettering the whole race of men.

"Now, my dear sir, take this task into your hands as quickly as possible: show yourself to be as virtuous as you truly are; as moderate as you naturally are; and, most importantly, demonstrate your lifelong love for justice, freedom, and harmony in a way that aligns with how you’ve acted over the past seventeen years. Let the people of England not only respect you but actually love you. When they think positively of individuals from your homeland, they'll be more likely to think favorably of your country; and when your fellow countrymen see themselves viewed positively by the English, they’ll be more inclined to think well of England. Broaden your vision even further; don’t stop at just those who speak English, but after settling so many issues in nature and politics, aim to improve the entire human race."

"As I have not read any part of the life in question, but know only the character that lived it, I write somewhat at hazard. I am sure, however, that the life, and the treatise I allude to (on the Art of Virtue), will necessarily fulfil the chief of my expectations; and still more so if you take up the measure of suiting these performances to the several views above stated. Should they even prove unsuccessful in all that a sanguine admirer of yours hopes from them, you will at least have framed pieces to interest the human mind; and whoever gives a feeling of pleasure that is innocent to man, has added so much to the fair side of a life otherwise too much darkened by anxiety and too much injured by pain.

"As I haven’t read any part of the life in question, but only know the character who lived it, I’m writing somewhat at random. However, I'm confident that the life and the work I’m referring to (on the Art of Virtue) will definitely meet my main expectations, especially if you tailor these pieces to the different perspectives mentioned above. Even if they turn out to be disappointing in everything a hopeful admirer like you expects from them, you’ll at least have created pieces that engage the human mind. Anyone who brings innocent pleasure to people has contributed positively to a life that is otherwise often overshadowed by anxiety and hurt."

"In the hope, therefore, that you will listen to the prayer addressed to you in this letter, I beg to subscribe myself, my dear sir, &c., &c.,

"In the hope that you will heed the request made in this letter, I kindly sign off, my dear sir, etc., etc.,"

Benj. Vaughan."

Benj. Vaughan.


CONTINUATION,

CONTINUING,

Begun at Passy, near Paris, 1784.

Started at Passy, near Paris, 1784.

It is some time since I received the above letters, but I have been too busy till now to think of complying with the request they contain. It might, too, be much better done if I were at home among my papers, which would aid my memory, and help to ascertain dates; but my return being uncertain, and having just now a little leisure, I will endeavour to recollect and write what I can: if I live to get home, it may there be corrected and improved.

It’s been a while since I got those letters, but I’ve been too busy to think about fulfilling the request they made. It might also be done much better if I were at home with my papers, which would help my memory and clarify some dates; however, since my return is uncertain and I have a little free time right now, I’ll try to remember and write what I can. If I make it home, I can correct and improve it there.

Not having any copy here of what is already written, I know not whether an account is given of the[Pg 99] means I used to establish the Philadelphia public library, which, from a small beginning, is now become so considerable, though I remember to have come down near the time of that transaction (1730). I will, therefore, begin here with an account of it, which may be struck out if found to have been already given.

Not having a copy of what’s already been written, I’m not sure if there’s already an account of the[Pg 99] means I used to set up the Philadelphia public library, which started small but has now grown so significant, even though I remember being around at the time of that event (1730). So, I’ll start here with an account of it, which can be removed if it turns out it’s already been covered.

At the time I established myself in Pennsylvania, there was not a good bookseller's shop in any of the colonies to the southward of Boston. In New-York and Philadelphia the printers were, indeed, stationers, but they sold only paper, &c., almanacs, ballads, and a few common schoolbooks. Those who loved reading were obliged to send for their books from England: the members of the Junto had each a few. We had left the alehouse where we first met, and hired a room to hold our club in. I proposed that we should all of us bring our books to that room, where they would not only be ready to consult in our conferences, but become a common benefit, each of us being at liberty to borrow such as he wished to read at home. This was accordingly done, and for some time contented us: finding the advantage of this little collection, I proposed to render the benefit from the books more common, by commencing a public subscription library. I drew a sketch of the plan and rules that would be necessary, and got a skilful conveyancer, Mr. Charles Brockden, to put the whole in form of articles of agreement to be subscribed; by which each subscriber engaged to pay a certain sum down for the first purchase of the books, and an annual contribution for increasing them. So few were the readers at that time in Philadelphia, and the majority of us so poor, that I was not able, with great industry, to find more than fifty persons (mostly young tradesmen) willing to pay down for this purpose forty shillings each, and ten shillings per annum; with this little fund we began. The books were imported; the library was[Pg 100] open one day in the week for lending them to subscribers, on their promissory notes to pay double the value if not duly returned. The institution soon manifested its utility; was imitated by other towns and in other provinces. The libraries were augmented by donations; reading became fashionable; and our people, having no public amusements to divert their attention from study, became better acquainted with books, and in a few years were observed by strangers to be better instructed and more intelligent than people of the same rank generally are in other countries.

When I settled in Pennsylvania, there wasn’t a good bookstore in any of the colonies south of Boston. In New York and Philadelphia, the printers acted as stationers, but they only sold paper, almanacs, ballads, and a few common schoolbooks. Those who enjoyed reading had to order their books from England; the members of the Junto each had a few. We had moved from the tavern where we first gathered and rented a room for our club. I suggested that we all bring our books to that room, so they would be available for our discussions and could benefit everyone, allowing us to borrow whatever we wanted to read at home. This was done, and for a while it satisfied us. Recognizing the value of our small collection, I proposed making access to the books more widespread by starting a public subscription library. I outlined a plan and rules we needed, and I enlisted a skilled conveyancer, Mr. Charles Brockden, to turn everything into an agreement for subscribers; each subscriber committed to pay a certain amount upfront for the initial book purchase and an annual fee to help grow the collection. There were so few readers in Philadelphia at that time, and most of us were so poor, that despite my best efforts, I could only find about fifty people (mostly young tradesmen) willing to contribute forty shillings each upfront and ten shillings annually. With this small fund, we got started. The books were imported, and the library was[Pg 100] open one day a week for lending to subscribers, who had to promise to pay double the value if they didn’t return them on time. The library quickly proved its usefulness; it was copied by other towns and provinces. The collections grew through donations; reading became popular; and because our people lacked public entertainment distractions, they became more familiar with books. In a few years, outsiders noticed that we were better educated and more knowledgeable than people of the same social standing in other countries.

When we were about to sign the above-mentioned articles, which were to be binding on us, our heirs, &c., for fifty years, Mr. Brockden, the scrivener, said to us: "You are young men, but it is scarce probable that any of you will live to see the expiration of the term fixed in the instrument." A number of us, however, are yet living; but the instrument was, after a few years, rendered null by a charter that incorporated and gave perpetuity to the company.

When we were about to sign the articles mentioned above, which would be binding for us, our heirs, etc., for fifty years, Mr. Brockden, the scrivener, said to us: "You’re young men, but it’s unlikely that any of you will live to see the end of the term stated in the document." Many of us are still alive, but the document was made null after a few years by a charter that incorporated and granted permanence to the company.

The objections and reluctances I met with in soliciting the subscriptions, made me soon feel the impropriety of presenting one's self as the proposer of any useful project that might be supposed to raise one's reputation in the smallest degree above that of one's neighbours, when one has need of their assistance to accomplish that project. I therefore put myself as much as I could out of sight, and stated it as a scheme of a number of friends, who had requested me to go about and propose it to such as they thought lovers of reading. In this way my affairs went on more smoothly, and I ever after practised it on such occasions, and from my frequent successes can heartily recommend it. The present little sacrifice of your vanity will afterward be amply repaid. If it remains a while uncertain to whom the merit belongs, some one more vain than yourself will be encouraged to claim it, and then even[Pg 101] envy will be disposed to do you justice, by plucking those assumed feathers and restoring them to their right owner.

The objections and hesitations I encountered while trying to get subscriptions quickly made me realize it was inappropriate to present myself as the one proposing any useful project that might seem to elevate my reputation even slightly above that of my neighbors when I needed their support to make that project happen. So, I tried to stay out of the spotlight as much as I could and framed it as a plan from a group of friends who had asked me to reach out to those they thought would appreciate reading. This way, my efforts went more smoothly, and I continued to use this approach on similar occasions. From my many successes, I can wholeheartedly recommend it. This small sacrifice of your pride will be well worth it in the end. If it's left unclear who deserves the credit, someone more self-absorbed than you might step in to take it, and then even[Pg 101] jealousy will likely do you a favor by stripping those false accolades away and handing them back to the rightful owner.

This library afforded me the means of improvement by constant study, for which I set apart an hour or two each day; and thus I repaired, in some degree, the loss of the learned education my father once intended for me. Reading was the only amusement I allowed myself. I spent no time in taverns, games, or frolics of any kind, and my industry in my business continued as indefatigable as it was necessary. I was indebted for my printing-house, I had a young family coming on to be educated, and I had two competitors to contend with for business who were established in the place before me. My circumstances, however, grew daily easier. My original habits of frugality continuing, and my father having, among his instructions to me when a boy, frequently repeated a Proverb of Solomon, "seest thou a man diligent in his calling, he shall stand before kings, he shall not stand before mean men," I thence considered industry as a means of obtaining wealth and distinction, which encouraged me; though I did not think that I should ever literally stand before kings, which, however, has since happened; for I have stood before five, and even had the honour of sitting down with one (the king of Denmark) to dinner.

This library gave me the chance to improve myself through regular study, which I dedicated an hour or two to each day. This helped me make up for the loss of the education my father had originally planned for me. Reading was my only source of entertainment. I didn't spend time in bars, playing games, or anything else like that, and I worked diligently at my job as it was required. I was responsible for my printing business, had a young family to educate, and faced competition from two established rivals in the area. However, my situation gradually became easier. I continued my habits of saving money, and my father often reminded me of a proverb from Solomon when I was a boy: "seest thou a man diligent in his calling, he shall stand before kings, he shall not stand before mean men." Because of that, I viewed hard work as a way to achieve wealth and recognition, which motivated me; even though I never thought I would literally stand before kings, that has happened since. I’ve stood before five, and even had the honor of having dinner with one (the king of Denmark).

We have an English proverb that says,

We have an English saying that goes,

"If you want to succeed,
You should consult your wife."

It was lucky for me that I had one as much disposed to industry and frugality as myself. She assisted me cheerfully in my business, folding and stitching pamphlets, tending shop, purchasing old linen rags for the paper-makers, &c. We kept no idle servants; our table was plain and simple, our furniture of the cheapest. For instance, my breakfast was,[Pg 102] for a long time, bread and milk (no tea), and I ate it out of a twopenny earthen porringer, with a pewter spoon: but mark how luxury will enter families, and make a progress in spite of principle; being called one morning to breakfast, I found it in a china bowl, with a spoon of silver. They had been bought for me without my knowledge by my wife, and had cost her the enormous sum of three-and-twenty shillings; for which she had no other excuse or apology to make, but that she thought her husband deserved a silver spoon and china bowl as well as any of his neighbours. This was the first appearance of plate and china in our house, which afterward, in a course of years, as our wealth increased, augmented gradually to several hundred pounds in value.

I was fortunate to have someone as hardworking and frugal as I was. She happily helped me with my business, folding and stitching pamphlets, running the shop, buying old linen rags for the paper-makers, and more. We didn't keep any lazy servants; our meals were basic and simple, and our furniture was the cheapest option available. For a long time, my breakfast was just bread and milk (no tea), and I ate it out of a two-penny earthen bowl with a pewter spoon. But notice how luxury can sneak into homes and gradually take over despite one's principles; one morning, when I was called for breakfast, I found it served in a china bowl, with a silver spoon. My wife had bought these for me without my knowledge, and they had cost her an incredible twenty-three shillings. Her only justification was that she thought her husband deserved a silver spoon and china bowl just like any of the neighbors. This was the first time we had silverware and china in our home, which, over the years as we gained more wealth, eventually grew to several hundred pounds in value.

I had been religiously educated as a Presbyterian; but though some of the dogmas of that persuasion appeared unintelligible, and I early absented myself from their public assemblies (Sunday being my studying day), I never was without some religious principles: I never doubted, for instance, the existence of a Deity; that he made the world, and governed it by his providence; that the most acceptable service of God was the doing good to man; that our souls are immortal; and that all crimes will be punished, and virtue rewarded, either here or hereafter. These I esteemed the essentials of every religion; and being to be found in all the religions we had in our country, I respected them all, though with different degrees of respect, as I found them more or less mixed with other articles, which, without any tendency to inspire, promote, or confirm morality, served principally to divide us, and make us unfriendly to one another. This respect to all, with an opinion that the worst had some effects, induced me to avoid all discourse that might tend to lessen the good opinion another might have of his own religion; and as our province increased in people,[Pg 103] and new places of worship were continually wanted and generally erected by voluntary contribution, my mite for such purpose, whatever might be the sect, was never refused.

I was raised in a Presbyterian environment, but even though some of their beliefs seemed unclear to me, and I often skipped their gatherings (since Sunday was my study day), I always held onto certain religious principles. For example, I never doubted that a Deity exists, that He created the world and oversees it through His providence, that the best way to serve God is by doing good for others, that our souls are eternal, and that all wrongdoings will be punished while virtue will be rewarded, either in this life or the next. I considered these to be the core essentials of every religion. Since I found these principles in all the faiths practiced in my country, I respected them all, though to varying degrees based on how closely they were tied to other beliefs that, instead of fostering morality, mainly served to divide us and create animosity. This respect for all, along with the belief that even the least favorable faith had some positive effects, led me to avoid discussions that might undermine someone else's faith. As our province grew in population, and new places of worship were always needed and generally built through voluntary donations, I contributed my share to such projects, regardless of the denomination.

Though I seldom attended any public worship, I had still an opinion of its propriety and of its utility when rightly conducted, and I regularly paid my annual subscription for the support of the only Presbyterian minister or meeting we had in Philadelphia. He used to visit me sometimes as a friend, and admonish me to attend his administrations; and I was now and then prevailed on to do so; once for five Sundays successively. Had he been in my opinion a good preacher, perhaps I might have continued, notwithstanding the occasion I had for the Sunday's leisure in my course of study: but his discourses were chiefly either polemic arguments, or explications of the peculiar doctrines of our sect, and were all to me very dry, uninteresting, and unedifying, since not a single moral principle was inculcated or enforced. I had some years before composed a little liturgy or form of prayer for my own private use (viz., in 1728), entitled Articles of Belief and Acts of Religion. I returned to the use of this, and went no more to the public assemblies. My conduct might be blameable, but I leave it without attempting farther to excuse it; my present purpose being to relate facts, and not to make apologies for them.

Though I rarely went to public worship, I still believed in its importance and benefits when done right, and I consistently paid my annual subscription to support the only Presbyterian minister or congregation we had in Philadelphia. He would sometimes visit me as a friend and encourage me to attend his services, and occasionally I did, once for five Sundays in a row. If I had thought he was a good preacher, I might have kept going, despite needing my Sundays to study. But his sermons were mostly either debates or explanations of our sect's unique beliefs, and I found them very dry, boring, and unhelpful since they didn't teach or reinforce any moral principles. A few years earlier, I had put together a little liturgy or prayer guide for my personal use (in 1728), called Articles of Belief and Acts of Religion. I returned to using that and stopped going to public gatherings. My actions might be questionable, but I'm not trying to justify them; my goal here is to just share the facts, not to make excuses.

It was about this time I conceived the bold and arduous project of arriving at moral perfection; I wished to live without committing any fault at any time, and to conquer all that either natural inclination, custom, or company might lead me into. As I knew, or thought I knew, what was right and wrong, I did not see why I might not always do the one and avoid the other. But I soon found I had undertaken a task of more difficulty than I had imagined: while my attention was taken up, and[Pg 104] care employed in guarding against one fault, I was often surprised by another; habit took the advantage of inattention; inclination was sometimes too strong for reason. I concluded, at length, that the mere speculative conviction, that it was our interest to be completely virtuous, was not sufficient to prevent our slipping; and that the contrary habits must be broken, and good ones acquired and established, before we can have any dependance on a steady, uniform rectitude of conduct. For this purpose I therefore tried the following method.

Around this time, I came up with the ambitious and challenging idea of achieving moral perfection; I wanted to live without making any mistakes and to overcome everything that natural instinct, tradition, or social influence might lead me to do. Since I believed I could tell right from wrong, I didn't see why I couldn't always choose the right path and avoid the wrong one. However, I soon realized I had taken on a task that was much harder than I'd thought: while I was focused on avoiding one mistake, I would often be caught off guard by another; habits took advantage of my distraction; sometimes, my desires were stronger than my reason. Eventually, I concluded that just believing it's in our best interest to be completely virtuous isn't enough to keep us from stumbling; we need to break bad habits and build good ones before we can rely on consistently behaving in a good way. So, I decided to try the following method.

In the various enumerations of the moral virtues I had met with in my reading, I found the catalogue more or less numerous, as different writers included more or fewer ideas under the same name. Temperance, for example, was by some confined to eating and drinking; while by others it was extended to mean the moderating of every other pleasure, appetite, inclination, or passion, bodily or mental, even to our avarice and ambition. I proposed to myself, for the sake of clearness, to use rather more names, with fewer ideas annexed to each, than a few names with more ideas; and I included, under thirteen names of virtues, all that at that time occurred to me as necessary or desirable, and annexed to each a short precept, which fully expressed the extent I gave to its meaning.

In the different lists of moral virtues I encountered in my reading, I noticed that the number varied, as different authors included varying ideas under the same term. For instance, some defined Temperance strictly in terms of eating and drinking, while others broadened it to encompass the moderation of all pleasures, desires, inclinations, or passions, both physical and mental, including our greed and ambition. To keep things clear, I decided to use more names with fewer ideas attached to each, rather than a few names with more ideas. I compiled a list of thirteen virtues that I saw as necessary or desirable at that time, and I added a brief principle to each one to clarify what I meant by it.

These names of virtues, with their precepts, were,

These names of virtues, with their principles, were,

1. Temperance.—Eat not to dulness: drink not to elevation.

1. Self-control.—Don’t eat until you feel stuffed: don’t drink to get high.

2. Silence.—Speak not but what may benefit others or yourself: avoid trifling conversation.

2. Silence.—Only speak if it benefits others or yourself: steer clear of pointless chatter.

3. Order.—Let all your things have their places: let each part of your business have its time.

3. Order.—Make sure everything has its place: give each part of your work its time.

4. Resolution.—Resolve to perform what you ought: perform without fail what you resolve.

4. Resolution.—Decide to do what you should: make sure to do what you've decided.

5. Frugality.—Make no expense but to do good to others or yourself: i.e., waste nothing.[Pg 105]

5. Budgeting.—Only spend money to benefit others or yourself: i.e., waste nothing.[Pg 105]

6. Industry.—Lose no time: be always employed in something useful: cut off all unnecessary actions.

6. Industry.—Don’t waste any time: always be engaged in something productive: eliminate all pointless activities.

7. Sincerity.—Use no hurtful deceit: think innocently and justly: and, if you speak, speak accordingly.

7. Genuineness.—Avoid any harmful deceit: think honestly and fairly: and, if you speak, do so accordingly.

8. Justice.—Wrong none by doing injuries, or omitting the benefits that are your duty.

8. Justice.—Don't harm anyone by causing injuries or neglecting the help that is your responsibility.

9. Moderation.—Avoid extremes: forbear resenting injuries so much as you think they deserve.

9. Moderation.—Avoid extremes: don't hold on to resentment for injuries any more than they actually deserve.

10. Cleanliness.—Tolerate no uncleanliness in body, clothes, or habitation.

10. Hygiene.—Do not accept any dirtiness in your body, clothes, or living space.

11. Tranquillity.—Be not disturbed at trifles, nor at accidents common or unavoidable.

11. Calm.—Don’t let minor things or common accidents bother you.

12. Chastity.

12. Celibacy.

13. Humility.

Humility.

My intention being to acquire the habitude of all these virtues, I judged it would be well not to distract my attention by attempting the whole at once, but to fix it on one of them at a time; and when I should be master of that, then to proceed to another; and so on till I should have gone through the thirteen: and as the previous acquisition of some might facilitate the acquisition of certain others, I arranged them with that view as they stand above. Temperance first, as it tends to promote that coolness and clearness of head which is so necessary where constant vigilance was to be kept up, and a guard maintained against the unremitting attraction of ancient habits and the force of perpetual temptations. This being acquired and established, Silence would be more easy; and my desire being to gain knowledge at the same time that I improved in virtue; and considering that in conversation it was obtained rather by the use of the ear than of the tongue, and, therefore, wishing to break a habit I was getting into of prattling, punning, and jesting (which only made me acceptable to trifling company),[Pg 106] I gave Silence the second place. This and the next, Order, I expected would allow me more time for attending to my project and my studies Resolution, once become habitual, would keep me firm in my endeavours to obtain all the subsequent virtues. Frugality and Industry, relieving me from my restraining debt, and producing affluence and independence, would make more easy the practice of Sincerity and Justice, &c., &c. Conceiving then, that, agreeably to the advice of Pythagoras in his Golden Verses, daily examination would be necessary, I contrived the following method for conducting that examination.

My goal was to develop the habit of all these virtues, so I thought it would be best not to try to tackle them all at once, but to focus on one at a time. Once I mastered that one, I would move on to the next, and continue this way until I had worked through all thirteen. I arranged them with the idea that mastering some might help with others. I chose Temperance first because it helps maintain the coolness and clarity of mind that are crucial for constant vigilance and resisting the pull of old habits and ongoing temptations. Once I had that down, Silence would be easier to achieve. I wanted to gain knowledge while I improved my virtues, and since conversation relies more on listening than talking, I aimed to break my habit of prattling, punning, and jesting (which only made me fit in with shallow people), so I placed Silence second. I believed this and the next virtue, Order, would allow me more time to focus on my projects and studies. Once Resolution became a habit, it would help keep me dedicated to achieving all the other virtues. Frugality and Industry, which would free me from my debts and lead to wealth and independence, would make it easier to practice Sincerity and Justice, and so on. Believing that, according to Pythagoras's advice in his Golden Verses, daily reflection would be necessary, I developed the following method for conducting that reflection.

I made a little book, in which I allotted a page for each of the virtues. I ruled each page with red ink, so as to have seven columns, one for each day of the week, marking each column with a letter for the day. I crossed these columns with thirteen red lines, marking the beginning of each line with the first letter of one of the virtues; on which line, and in its proper column, I might mark, by a little black spot, every fault I found upon examination to have been committed respecting that virtue upon that day.[10][Pg 107]

I created a little book where I dedicated a page to each virtue. I divided each page with red ink into seven columns, one for each day of the week, labeling each column with a letter for the day. I crossed these columns with thirteen red lines, starting each line with the first letter of one of the virtues; on those lines, in the correct column, I could mark with a small black spot every fault I discovered after reviewing that virtue for that day.[10][Pg 107]

Form of the pages.

Page layout.

TEMPERANCE.
Eat not to dulness: drink not to elevation.

TEMPERANCE.
Don’t eat until you feel stuffed: don’t drink to get high.

 Sun.M.T.W.Th.F.S.
Tem.       
Sil.** * * 
Ord.*** ***
Res. *   * 
Fru. *   * 
Ind.  *    
Sinc.       
Jus.       
Mod.       
Clea.       
Tran.       
Chas.       
Hum.       

I determined to give a week's strict attention to each of the virtues successively. Thus, in the first week, my great guard was to every the least offence against Temperance; leaving the other virtues to their ordinary chance, only marking every evening the faults of the day. Thus, if in the first week I could keep my first line marked T. clear of spots, I supposed the habit of that virtue so much strengthened, and its opposite weakened, that I might venture extending my attention to include the next, and for the following week keep both lines clear of spots. Proceeding thus to the last, I could get through a course complete in thirteen weeks, and four courses in a year. And like him who, having a garden to weed, does not attempt to eradicate all the bad herbs at once (which would exceed his reach and his strength), but works on one of the beds at a time, and having accomplished the first, proceeds to a second, so I should have (I hoped)[Pg 108] the encouraging pleasure of seeing on my pages the progress made in virtue, by clearing successively my lines of their spots, till, in the end, by a number of courses, I should be happy in viewing a clean book, after a thirteen week's daily examination.

I decided to focus on each virtue for a week at a time. In the first week, my main goal was to avoid even the smallest offense against Temperance; I left the other virtues to their usual chance, only noting my faults each evening. If I could keep my first line marked T. free of spots during that week, I believed I had strengthened that virtue and weakened its opposite enough to move on to the next one, managing to keep both lines clear during the following week. By following this approach to the end, I could complete a full cycle in thirteen weeks and do four cycles in a year. Just like someone weeding a garden who doesn’t try to pull out all the weeds at once (which would be too much to handle), but focuses on one section at a time, I hoped to see progress in my virtues by gradually clearing my pages of spots, so that by the end, after thirteen weeks of daily reflection, I would be pleased to look at a clean book.[Pg 108]

This my little book had for its motto these lines from Addison's Cato:

This little book of mine has these lines from Addison's Cato as its motto:

"I will stand here; if there’s a higher power above us
(And there is, as all of nature shouts
Through everything it creates), he must love virtue;
And what he loves must be happy."

Another from Cicero:

Another quote from Cicero:

O vitæ philosophia dux! O virtutum indagatrix et expultrixque vitiorum! Unus dies bene, et ex præceptis tuis actus, peccanti immortalitati est anteponendus."

O philosophy of life, guide! O seeker of virtue and banisher of vices! One good day, and actions based on your teachings, should be valued over an immortal life filled with wrongdoing.

"Oh Philosophy, guide of life! Diligent inquirer after virtue, and banisher of vice! A single day well spent, and as thy precepts direct, is to be preferred to an eternity of sin."

"Oh Philosophy, guide to life! You diligently seek virtue and banish vice! A single day well spent, following your teachings, is better than an eternity of sin."

Another from the Proverbs of Solomon, speaking of wisdom or virtue:

Another from the Proverbs of Solomon, talking about wisdom or virtue:

"Length of days is in her right hand, and in her left hand riches and honour. Her ways are ways of pleasantness, and all her paths are peace."

"She holds long life in her right hand, and in her left hand, wealth and honor. Her ways are enjoyable, and all her paths lead to peace."

And conceiving God to be the fountain of wisdom, I thought it right and necessary to solicit his assistance for obtaining it; to this end I formed the following little prayer, which was prefixed to my tables of examination, for daily use.

And since I believe that God is the source of wisdom, I thought it was right and necessary to ask for his help in gaining it; for this purpose, I created the following short prayer, which I placed at the beginning of my study guides for daily use.

"O powerful Goodness! bountiful Father! merciful Guide! Increase me in that wisdom which discovers my truest interest: Strengthen my resolution to perform what that wisdom dictates! Accept my kind offices to thy other children as the only return in my power for thy continual favours to me."

"O powerful Goodness! Generous Father! Kind Guide! Help me grow in the wisdom that reveals my true interests: Strengthen my determination to do what that wisdom tells me! Please accept my efforts to support your other children as the only way I can repay you for your ongoing blessings in my life."

I used also, sometimes, a little prayer which I took from Thomson's Poems, viz.,[Pg 109]

I also occasionally used a short prayer that I took from Thomson's Poems, specifically,[Pg 109]

"Father of light and life, you are the supreme God!
Please teach me what is good; show me yourself!
Save me from foolishness, vanity, and vice,
From every lowly pursuit; and fill my soul
With knowledge, inner peace, and pure virtue;
Sacred, real, and everlasting bliss!"

The precept of Order, requiring that every part of my business should have its allotted time, one page in my little book contained the following scheme of employment for the twenty-four hours of a natural day.

The principle of Order, stating that every part of my work should have its designated time, included in my little book was the following schedule for the twenty-four hours of a typical day.

SCHEME.

DAILY SCHEDULE.

Hours.

Morning.

Morning.

The Question
What good shall
I do this day?

The Question
What good can
I do today?

{

5
6
7

5
6
7

}

Rise, wash, and address Powerful
Goodness
! Contrive day's business, and
take the resolution of the day; prosecute
the present study, and breakfast.

Wake up, wash up, and focus on Powerful
Goodness
! Make a plan for the day's tasks and
decide what you want to achieve today; continue
with your current studies, and have breakfast.

8
9
10
11

8
9
10
11

}

Work.

Work.

Noon. {

12
1

12
1

}

Read, or look over my accounts, and
dine.

Check my messages or accounts, and
have lunch.

Afternoon. {

2
3
4
5

2
3
4
5

}

Work.

Work.

Evening.

Evening.

The Question,
What good have
I done to-day?

The Question,
What good have
I done today?

{

6
7
8
9

6
7
8
9

}

Put things in their places. Supper,
music, or diversion, or conversation.
Examination of the day.

Put everything away. Dinner,
music, entertainment, or chatting.
Reflect on the day.

Night. {

10
11
12
1
2
3
4

10
11
12
1
2
3
4

}

Sleep.

Sleep.

I entered upon the execution of this plan for self-examination, and continued it, with occasional intermissions, for some time. I was surprised to find myself so much fuller of faults than I had[Pg 110] imagined; but I had the satisfaction of seeing them diminish. To avoid the trouble of renewing now and then my little book, which, by scraping out the marks on the paper of old faults to make room for new ones in a new course, became full of holes, I transferred my tables and precepts to the ivory leaves of a memorandum book, on which the lines were drawn with red ink, that made a durable stain; and on those lines I marked my faults with a black lead pencil; which marks I could easily wipe out with a wet sponge. After a while I went through one course only in a year; and afterward only one in several years; till at length I omitted them entirely, being employed in voyages and business abroad, with a multiplicity of affairs that interfered; but I always carried my little book with me. My scheme of Order gave me the most trouble; and I found that though it might be practicable where a man's business was such as to leave him the disposition of his time, that of a journeyman-printer, for instance, it was not possible to be exactly observed by a master, who must mix with the world, and often receive people of business at their own hours. Order, too, with regard to places for things, papers, &c., I found it extremely difficult to acquire. I had not been early accustomed to method, and having an exceeding good memory, I was not so sensible of the inconvenience attending want of method. This article, therefore, cost me much painful attention, and my faults in it vexed me so much, and I made so little progress in amendment, and had such frequent relapses, that I was almost ready to give up the attempt, and content myself with a faulty character in that respect. Like the man who, in buying an axe of a smith my neighbour, desired to have the whole of its surface as bright as the edge, the smith consented to grind it bright for him if he would turn the wheel: he turned while the smith pressed the broad face of the axe hard and heavily[Pg 111] on the stone, which made the turning of it very fatiguing. The man came every now and then from the wheel to see how the work went on; and at length would take his axe as it was, without farther grinding. "No," said the smith, "turn on, we shall have it bright by-and-by; as yet 'tis only speckled." "Yes," said the man, "but I think I like a speckled axe best." And I believe this may have been the case with many, who having, for the want of some such means as I employed, found the difficulty of obtaining good and breaking bad habits in other points of vice and virtue, have given up the struggle, and concluded that "a speckled axe was best." For something that pretended to be reason was every now and then suggesting to me, that such extreme nicety as I exacted of myself, might be a kind of foppery in morals, which, if it were known, would make me ridiculous; that a perfect character might be attended with the inconvenience of being envied and hated; and that a benevolent man should allow a few faults in himself, to keep his friends in countenance. In truth, I found myself incorrigible with respect to Order; and, now I am grown old and my memory bad, I feel very sensibly the want of it. But, on the whole, though I never arrived at the perfection I had been so ambitious of obtaining, but fell far short of it, yet I was, by the endeavour, a better and a happier man than I otherwise should have been if I had not attempted it; as those who aim at perfect writing by imitating the engraved copies, though they may never reach the wished-for excellence of those copies, their hand is mended by the endeavour, and is tolerable while it continues fair and legible.

I started working on my plan for self-reflection and kept it up, with some breaks, for a while. I was surprised to discover just how many faults I had, way more than I thought I did[Pg 110]; but I felt good seeing them decrease. To avoid the hassle of replacing my little book, which became full of holes from erasing marks for old faults to make room for new ones, I moved my tables and guidelines to the ivory pages of a notebook with red ink lines that left a permanent stain. I marked my faults with a pencil that I could easily wipe away with a wet sponge. Eventually, I only went through one course a year; later on, I did just one every few years; until I completely stopped, since I was busy with travel and work that took up my time. Even so, I always carried my little book with me. My system of Order was the most challenging for me, and I realized that while it might work for someone whose job let them manage their time, like a journeyman printer, it wasn’t feasible for a master who had to interact with the world and often meet people for business at their convenience. I also found it extremely tough to create order regarding where to keep things and papers. I hadn’t learned method early on, and with my excellent memory, I wasn’t as aware of the issues caused by a lack of it. This part took a lot of painful focus, and my mistakes frustrated me so much, and I made so little progress, that I nearly gave up and accepted being flawed in this area. It reminded me of a man who, when buying an axe from a smith, wanted the whole surface as shiny as the edge. The smith agreed to grind it for him if he would turn the wheel; he turned while the smith pressed hard on the broad face of the axe against the stone, which made it tiring to turn. The man would check on the progress every so often, and eventually just took his axe as it was, without any further grinding. "No," said the smith, "keep turning; we'll get it shiny eventually; right now, it’s just speckled." "Yes," replied the man, "but I think I like a speckled axe best." I believe that many people, lacking the tools I used, have struggled with developing good habits and breaking bad ones in other areas of vice and virtue, and ultimately given up, deciding that "a speckled axe is best." Something resembling reasoning occasionally suggested to me that the extreme standards I imposed on myself could be a kind of obsession with morals, which, if known, would make me look foolish; that a perfect character might come with the downside of being envied and disliked; and that a kind-hearted person should allow for a few flaws in themselves to make their friends feel comfortable. In reality, I found myself unchangeable regarding Order; and now that I’m older and my memory is failing, I feel the lack of it even more. But overall, even though I never achieved the perfection I aimed for and fell far short of it, the effort made me a better and happier person than I would have been had I not tried; like those who strive for perfect handwriting by copying engraved samples, even if they never reach the sought-after excellence of those examples, their writing improves through the effort and remains decent as long as it stays neat and readable.

It may be well my posterity should be informed, that to this little artifice, with the blessing of God, their ancestor owed the constant felicity of his life down to the 79th year, in which this is written. What reverses may attend the remainder is in the[Pg 112] hand of Providence: but if they arrive, the reflection on past happiness enjoyed ought to help his bearing them with more resignation. To temperance he ascribes his long-continued health, and what is still left to him of a good constitution. To industry and frugality, the early easiness of his circumstances and acquisition of his fortune, with all that knowledge that enabled him to be a useful citizen and obtained for him some degree of reputation among the learned. To sincerity and justice, the confidence of his country, and the honourable employs it conferred upon him: and to the joint influence of the whole mass of the virtues, even in the imperfect state he was able to acquire them, all that evenness of temper and that cheerfulness in conversation which makes his company still sought for, and agreeable even to his young acquaintance: I hope, therefore, that some of my descendants may follow the example and reap the benefit.

It might be good for my descendants to know that thanks to this small trick, and with God's blessing, their ancestor enjoyed a happy life right up to the 79th year in which this is written. Whatever challenges may come next are in the hands of Providence: but if they do come, reflecting on the happiness he has experienced should help him handle them with more acceptance. He credits moderation for his long-lasting health and what remains of his good constitution. He attributes hard work and thrift to the early ease of his situation and the building of his wealth, along with all the knowledge that allowed him to be a helpful citizen and earned him some recognition among the educated. He gives credit to honesty and fairness for the trust of his community and the respected positions it granted him: and to the combined effect of all these virtues, even in the imperfect way he embraced them, for the calm demeanor and cheerful nature that make him well-liked and enjoyable even to his younger friends. Therefore, I hope some of my descendants will follow this example and enjoy the benefits.

It will be remarked that, though my scheme was not wholly without religion, there was in it no mark of any of the distinguishing tenets of any particular sect; I had purposely avoided them; for being fully persuaded of the utility and excellence of my method, and that it might be serviceable to people in all religions, and intending some time or other to publish it, I would not have anything in it that would prejudice any one of any sect against it. I proposed writing a little comment on each virtue, in which I would have shown the advantages of possessing it, and the mischiefs attending its opposite vice; I should have called my book The Art of Virtue, because it would have shown the means and manner of obtaining virtue, which would have distinguished it from the mere exhortation to be good, that does not instruct and indicate the means; but is like the apostle's man of verbal charity, who, without showing to the naked and hungry how or where they might get clothes or victuals, only exhorted[Pg 113] them to be fed and clothed James ii., 15, 16.

It should be noted that while my plan included some elements of religion, it did not reflect the specific beliefs of any one group; I intentionally left those out. I truly believed in the usefulness and value of my approach, and I thought it could help people across all faiths. Since I intended to publish it eventually, I wanted to keep it neutral so that no one from any faith would be put off by it. I intended to write a brief commentary on each virtue, illustrating the benefits of having it and the harm of its opposing vice. I would have titled my book The Art of Virtue, as it would have explained how to achieve virtue, setting it apart from simple calls to be good, which don’t provide guidance or practical steps; it would be similar to the apostle's example of someone who, instead of showing the poor and hungry how to get food and clothing, merely urged them to be fed and clothed (James ii., 15, 16).

But it so happened that my intention of writing and publishing this comment was never fulfilled. I had, indeed, from time to time, put down short hints of the sentiments, reasonings, &c., to be made use of in it, some of which I have still by me: but the necessary close attention to private business in the earlier part of life, and public business since, have occasioned my postponing it. For it being connected in my mind with a great and extensive project, that required the whole man to execute, and which an unforeseen succession of employs prevented my attending to, it has hitherto remained unfinished.

But it just so happened that my plan to write and publish this commentary was never realized. I had, from time to time, jotted down brief notes of the thoughts, arguments, etc., that I intended to include, some of which I still have on hand: but the need to focus on personal business in the earlier part of my life, and public duties since then, has led me to delay it. Since it was linked in my mind to a big and ambitious project that required my full attention, and which an unexpected series of commitments prevented me from pursuing, it has so far remained unfinished.

In this piece it was my design to explain and enforce this doctrine, that vicious actions are not hurtful because they are forbidden, but forbidden because they are hurtful; the nature of man alone considered: that it was, therefore, every one's interest to be virtuous, who wished to be happy even in this world: and I should, from this circumstance (there being always in the world a number of rich merchants, nobility, states, and princes who have need of honest instruments for the management of their affairs, and such being so rare), have endeavoured to convince young persons, that no qualities are so likely to make a poor man's fortune as those of probity and integrity.

In this piece, I aimed to explain and emphasize this idea, that bad actions aren't harmful just because they're banned, but they're banned because they're harmful; considering the nature of humanity alone: that it’s in everyone's best interest to be virtuous if they want to be happy, even in this world. I would, therefore, try to persuade young people that no qualities are more likely to improve a poor person's fortune than those of honesty and integrity.

My list of virtues contained at first but twelve: but a Quaker friend having kindly informed me that I was generally thought proud; that my pride showed itself frequently in conversation; that I was not content with being in the right when discussing any point, but was overbearing, and rather insolent (of which he convinced me by mentioning several instances), I determined to endeavour to cure myself, if I could, of this vice or folly among the rest; and I added humility to my list, giving an extensive[Pg 114] meaning to the word. I cannot boast of much success in acquiring the reality of this virtue, but I had a good deal with regard to the appearance of it. I made it a rule to forbear all direct contradiction to the sentiments of others, and all positive assertion of mine own. I even forbid myself, agreeably to the old laws of our junto, the use of every word or expression in the language that imported a fixed opinion; such as certainly, undoubtedly, &c., and I adopted, instead of them, I conceive, I apprehend, or I imagine a thing to be so or so; or it so appears to me at present. When another asserted something that I thought an error, I denied myself the pleasure of contradicting him abruptly, and of showing immediately some absurdity in his proposition; and in answering I began by observing that in certain cases or circumstances his opinion would be right, but in the present case there appeared, or seemed to me, some difference, &c. I soon found the advantage of this change in my manners; the conversations I engaged in went on more pleasantly. The modest way in which I proposed my opinions procured them a readier reception and less contradiction; I had less mortification when I was found to be in the wrong, and I more easily prevailed with others to give up their mistakes and join with me when I happened to be in the right. And this mode, which I at first put on with some violence to natural inclination, became at length easy, and so habitual to me, that perhaps for the fifty years past no one has ever heard a dogmatical expression escape me. And to this habit (after my character of integrity) I think it principally owing that I had early so much weight with my fellow-citizens when I proposed new institutions or alterations in the old, and so much influence in public councils when I became a member: for I was but a bad speaker, never eloquent, subject to much hesitation in my choice of words, hardly correct in language, and yet I generally carried my point.[Pg 115]

My list of virtues initially included only twelve, but a Quaker friend kindly informed me that people generally thought I was proud; my pride often showed in conversations, and I wasn't satisfied with just being right when debating a point. I came across as overbearing and somewhat rude, which he convinced me of by mentioning several situations. I decided to try to fix this vice or folly, among others, and added humility to my list, giving the word a broad[Pg 114] interpretation. I can't claim much success in truly acquiring this virtue, but I did manage to appear more humble. I made it a rule not to directly contradict others' opinions and to avoid insisting on my own. I even prohibited myself, following the old rules of our group, from using any words or phrases that implied a fixed opinion, like certainly, undoubtedly, etc. Instead, I used expressions like I believe, I think, or I imagine something to be this way or that; or it appears to me now. If someone stated something I thought was wrong, I refrained from the urge to contradict them immediately and point out the absurdity in their argument. Instead, I would start my response by saying that in certain cases or circumstances their opinion would be correct, but in the current context, there seemed to be some differences, etc. I quickly recognized the benefits of this change in my behavior; the conversations I participated in became more pleasant. The modest way I presented my opinions made them more readily accepted and met with less resistance. I experienced less embarrassment when I was wrong, and I found it easier to convince others to let go of their mistakes and agree with me when I was right. This approach, which I initially adopted somewhat against my natural inclination, eventually became easy and so habitual that for perhaps the last fifty years, no one has heard me make a dogmatic statement. I believe this habit, along with my reputation for integrity, was mainly responsible for the influence I had with my fellow citizens when I proposed new ideas or changes to existing ones, and for my effectiveness in public councils once I became a member. I wasn't a great speaker, never eloquent, often hesitating over my choice of words, and rarely correct in my language, yet I usually managed to get my point across.[Pg 115]

In reality, there is, perhaps, no one of our natural passions so hard to subdue as pride; disguise it, struggle with it, stifle it, mortify it as much as you please, it is still alive, and will every now and then peep out and show itself; you will see it perhaps often in this history. For even if I could conceive that I had completely overcome it, I should probably be proud of my humility.

In reality, there’s probably no natural passion that's harder to control than pride; you can hide it, fight it, suppress it, or even beat yourself up over it, but it’s still there and will occasionally show itself; you might notice it often in this story. Because even if I could think that I had completely conquered it, I would probably feel proud of my humility.

[Here concludes what was written at Passy, near Paris.]

[Here concludes what was written at Passy, near Paris.]


MEMORANDUM.

Memo.

I am now about to write at home (Philadelphia), August, 1788, but cannot have the help expected from my papers, many of them being lost in the war. I have, however, found the following:

I’m about to write from home (Philadelphia), August, 1788, but I can’t get the help I expected from my papers since many of them were lost in the war. However, I did find the following:

Having mentioned a great and extensive project which I had conceived, it seems proper that some account should be here given of that project and its object. Its first rise in my mind appears in the above-mentioned little paper, accidentally preserved, viz.:

Having mentioned a great and extensive project that I came up with, it seems appropriate to provide some details about that project and its purpose. The initial thought behind it can be found in the above-mentioned little paper, which was preserved by chance, namely:

Observations on my reading history, in library, May 9, 1731.

Observations on my reading history, in library, May 9, 1731.

"That the great affairs of the world, the wars, revolutions, &c., are carried on and effected by parties.

"That the major events of the world, like wars and revolutions, are driven and influenced by groups."

"That the view of these parties is their present general interest; or what they take to be such.

"That the perspective of these groups is based on their current general interest; or what they believe that interest to be."

"That the different views of these different parties occasion all confusion.

"That the varying perspectives of these different groups are the cause of all the confusion."

"That while a party is carrying on a general design, each man has his particular private interest in view.

"While a group is pursuing a common goal, each person has their own individual interests in mind."

"That, as soon as a party has gained its general point, each member becomes intent upon his particular[Pg 116] interest, which, thwarting others, breaks that party into divisions and occasions more confusion.

"Once a group has achieved its main goal, each member starts focusing on their own personal interest, which, by opposing others, splits the group into factions and creates even more chaos.[Pg 116]"

"That few in public affairs act from a mere view of the good of their country, whatever they may pretend; and though their actings bring real good to their country, yet men primarily considered that their own and their country's interest were united, and so did not act from a principle of benevolence.

"Very few people involved in public affairs act solely out of a genuine concern for the good of their country, no matter what they might claim; and while their actions may actually benefit the country, people mainly see that their own interests and those of their country are aligned, so they don't act out of a purely altruistic principle."

"That fewer still, in public affairs, act with a view to the good of mankind.

"That even fewer, in public matters, act with the intention of benefiting humanity."

"There seems to me at present to be great occasion for raising a United Party for Virtue, by forming the virtuous and good men of all nations into a regular body, to be governed by suitable good and wise rules, which good and wise men may probably be more unanimous in their obedience to than common people are to common laws.

There seems to me to be a strong need right now to create a United Party for Virtue, by bringing together virtuous and good people from all nations into an organized group, governed by appropriate good and wise rules, which decent and wise individuals are likely to follow more consistently than ordinary people follow regular laws.

"I at present think, that whoever attempts this aright, and is well qualified, cannot fail of pleasing God and of meeting with success.

"I currently believe that anyone who approaches this properly and is well-qualified will certainly please God and find success."

B. F."

B. F.

Revolving this project in my mind as to be undertaken hereafter, when my circumstances should afford me the necessary leisure, I put down from time to time, on pieces of paper, such thoughts as occurred to me respecting it. Most of these are lost, but I find one purporting to be the substance of an intended creed, containing, as I thought, the essentials of every known religion, and being free of everything that might shock the professors of any religion. It is expressed in these words: viz.,

Revisiting this project in my mind to undertake later, when my situation allows me the necessary free time, I occasionally jotted down on pieces of paper the thoughts that came to me regarding it. Most of these are lost, but I found one that seems to be the core of a proposed belief system, which I believed contained the essentials of every known religion, while avoiding anything that might offend followers of any faith. It is expressed in these words: viz.,

"That there is one God, who made all things.

That there is one God who created everything.

"That he governs the world by his providence.

That he controls the world through his guidance.

"That he ought to be worshipped by adoration, prayer, and thanksgiving.

"That he should be worshipped through adoration, prayer, and gratitude."

"But that the most acceptable service to God is doing good to man.

"But the most meaningful way to serve God is by helping others."

"That the soul is immortal.

The soul is immortal.

"And that God will certainly reward virtue and punish vice, either here or hereafter."[Pg 117]

"And that God will definitely reward good deeds and punish wrongdoing, whether in this life or the next."[Pg 117]

My ideas at that time were, that the sect should be begun and spread at first among young and single men only; that each person to be initiated should not only declare his assent to such creed, but should have exercised himself with the thirteen weeks' examination and practice of the virtues, as in the before-mentioned model; that the existence of such a society should be kept a secret till it was become considerable, to prevent solicitations for the admission of improper persons; but that the members should, each of them, search among his acquaintance for ingenious, well-disposed youths, to whom, with prudent caution, the scheme should be gradually communicated. That the members should engage to afford their advice, assistance, and support to each other in promoting one another's interest, business, and advancement in life: that, for distinction, we should be called The Society of the Free and Easy. Free, as being, by the general practice and habits of the virtues, free from the dominion of vice; and particularly by the practice of industry and frugality, free from debt, which exposes a man to constraint, and a species of slavery to his creditors.

My ideas at that time were that the group should start and grow mainly among young, single men. Each person who wanted to join should not only agree with the beliefs of the group but also go through a thirteen-week examination and practice of the virtues, as mentioned earlier. The existence of such a society should be kept secret until it became significant, to avoid requests for the admission of unsuitable people. Each member should look among their friends for clever, well-meaning young men to whom the plan could be carefully and gradually revealed. Members should promise to give each other advice, help, and support in promoting one another's interests, careers, and success in life. For distinction, we would be called The Free and Easy Society. Free, as we would be, through the common practice and habits of the virtues, free from the control of vice; and especially through the practice of hard work and thrift, free from debt, which can trap a person and create a kind of slavery to their creditors.

This is as much as I can now recollect of the project, except that I communicated it in part to two young men, who adopted it with enthusiasm: but my then narrow circumstances, and the necessity I was under of sticking close to my business, occasioned my postponing the farther prosecution of it at that time, and my multifarious occupations, public and private, induced me to continue postponing, so that it has been omitted, till I have no longer strength or activity left sufficient for such an enterprise. Though I am still of opinion it was a practicable scheme, and might have been very useful, by forming a great number of good citizens: and I was not discouraged by the seeming magnitude of the undertaking, as I have always thought that one[Pg 118] man of tolerable abilities may work great changes and accomplish great affairs among mankind, if he first forms a good plan; and, cutting off all amusements or other employments that would divert his attention, makes the connexion of that same plan his sole study and business.

This is all I can remember about the project right now, except that I shared part of it with two young men who were really enthusiastic. However, my financial situation at the time and the need to focus on my work meant I had to put it on hold. As I got busy with various public and private responsibilities, I kept delaying it, to the point where I now no longer have the energy or drive for such an undertaking. Still, I believe it was a feasible idea that could have been very beneficial by creating a large number of responsible citizens. I was never discouraged by the apparent size of the project, as I’ve always thought that one person with decent abilities can make significant changes and achieve great things in society if they first develop a solid plan, and set aside all distractions or other tasks that might shift their focus, making the connection to that plan their only pursuit.

In 1732 I first published my Almanac under the name of Richard Saunders; it was continued by me about twenty-five years, and commonly called Poor Richard's Almanac. I endeavoured to make it both entertaining and useful, and it accordingly came to be in such demand that I reaped considerable profit from it, vending annually near ten thousand. And observing that it was generally read (scarce any neighbourhood in the province being without it), I considered it as a proper vehicle for conveying instruction among the common people, who bought scarcely any other books. I therefore filled all the little spaces that occurred between the remarkable days in the calendar with proverbial sentences, chiefly such as inculcated industry and frugality as the means of procuring wealth, and thereby securing virtue; it being more difficult for a man in want to act always honestly, as (to use here one of those proverbs) "it is hard for an empty sack to stand upright." These proverbs, which contained the wisdom of many ages and nations, I assembled and formed into a connected discourse, prefixed to the Almanac of 1757 as the harangue of a wise old man to the people attending an auction: the bringing all these scattered counsels thus into a focus, enabled them to make greater impression. The piece, being universally approved, was copied in all the newspapers of the American Continent; reprinted in Britain on a large sheet of paper, to be stuck up in houses; two translations were made of it in French, and great numbers bought by the clergy and gentry to distribute gratis among their poor parishioners and tenants. In Pennsylvania, as it[Pg 119] discouraged useless expense in foreign superfluities, some thought it had its share of influence in producing that growing plenty of money which was observable for several years after its publication.

In 1732, I first published my Almanac under the name of Richard Saunders; I continued it for about twenty-five years, and it was commonly known as Poor Richard's Almanac. I aimed to make it both entertaining and useful, and it became so popular that I made a significant profit from it, selling nearly ten thousand copies each year. Noticing that it was widely read (almost every neighborhood in the province had it), I thought it would be a good way to provide instruction to the common people, who rarely bought any other books. So, I filled all the little spaces between the notable dates in the calendar with proverbs, mainly those that promoted hard work and thrift as the keys to gaining wealth and thereby ensuring virtue; it’s harder for someone in need to always act honestly, as one proverb puts it: "it is hard for an empty sack to stand upright." These proverbs, which carried the wisdom of many ages and cultures, I gathered and arranged into a connected narrative, introducing it in the Almanac of 1757 as a speech from a wise old man to people at an auction: bringing all these scattered pieces of advice together made a stronger impact. The piece, being widely praised, was printed in all the newspapers across the American continent; it was reprinted in Britain on large sheets of paper for posting in homes; it was translated into French twice, and many copies were purchased by clergy and gentry to give away for free to their less fortunate parishioners and tenants. In Pennsylvania, as it[Pg 119] discouraged needless spending on foreign luxuries, some believed it contributed to the growing abundance of money that was noticeable for several years after its publication.

I considered my newspaper also another means of communicating instruction, and in that view frequently reprinted in it extracts from the Spectator and other moral writers; and sometimes published little pieces of mine own, which had been first composed for reading in our Junto. Of these are a Socratic dialogue, tending to prove that, whatever might be his parts and abilities, a vicious man could not properly be called a man of sense; and a discourse on self-denial, showing that virtue was not secure till its practice became a habitude, and was free from the opposition of contrary inclinations: these may be found in the papers about the beginning of 1735. In the conduct of my newspaper I carefully excluded all libelling and personal abuse, which is of late years become so disgraceful to our country. Whenever I was solicited to insert anything of that kind, and the writers pleaded (as they generally did) the liberty of the press, and that a newspaper was like a stagecoach, in which any one who would pay had a right to a place, my answer was, that I would print the piece separately if desired, and the author might have as many copies as he pleased to distribute himself, but that I would not take upon me to spread his detraction; and that, having contracted with my subscribers to furnish them with what might be either useful or entertaining, I could not fill their papers with private altercation, in which they had no concern, without doing them manifest injustice. Now, many of our printers make no scruple of gratifying the malice of individuals by false accusations of the fairest characters among ourselves, augmenting animosity even to the producing of duels; and are, moreover, so indiscreet as to print scurrilous reflections on the[Pg 120] government of neighbouring states, and even on the conduct of our best national allies, which may be attended with the most pernicious consequences. These things I mention as a caution to young printers, and that they may be encouraged not to pollute the presses and disgrace their profession by such infamous practices, but refuse steadily, as they may see by my example that such a course of conduct will not, on the whole, be injurious to their interests.

I saw my newspaper as another way to share information, so I often included excerpts from the *Spectator* and other moral writers; sometimes, I even published my own short pieces that I initially wrote for our Junto. These include a Socratic dialogue that argues that, no matter his talents or skills, a corrupt person cannot truly be considered sensible; and a discussion on self-denial, demonstrating that virtue isn't secure until it becomes a habit and is free from conflicting desires. You can find these in the papers from early 1735. In running my newspaper, I made sure to exclude all slander and personal attacks, which have sadly become quite common in our country in recent years. Whenever I was asked to include anything like that, and the authors argued (as they usually did) that it was a matter of freedom of the press, claiming that a newspaper is like a stagecoach where anyone willing to pay has a right to a seat, I would respond that I would be happy to print their piece separately, and the author could request as many copies as they wanted to distribute themselves, but I wouldn't take on the responsibility of spreading their insults. I reminded them that, having promised my subscribers useful or entertaining content, I couldn't fill their papers with personal disputes they weren't involved in, as that would clearly be unfair to them. These days, many printers have no qualms about feeding individuals' grudges by printing false accusations against some of the most reputable people among us, escalating conflicts to the point of duels; they even irresponsibly publish derogatory comments about the [Pg 120] government of neighboring states and our best national allies, which could lead to disastrous outcomes. I mention these issues as a warning to young printers, encouraging them not to tarnish their presses and disgrace their profession through such disgraceful actions, but to refuse firmly, as they can see from my example that this kind of behavior will ultimately not harm their interests.

In 1733 I sent one of my journeymen to Charleston, South Carolina, where a printer was wanting. I furnished him with a press and letters, on an agreement of partnership, by which I was to receive one third of the profits of the business, paying one third of the expense. He was a man of learning, but ignorant in matters of account; and, though he sometimes made me remittances, I could get no account from him, nor any satisfactory state of our partnership while he lived. On his decease the business was continued by his widow, who, being born and bred in Holland, where (as I have been informed) the knowledge of accounts makes a part of female education, she not only sent me as clear a statement as she could find of the transactions past, but continued to account with the greatest regularity and exactness every quarter afterward; and managed the business with such success, that she not only reputably brought up a family of children, but, at the expiration of the term, was able to purchase of me the printing-house and establish her son in it. I mention this affair chiefly for the sake of recommending that branch of education for our young women, as likely to be of more use to them and their children in case of widowhood than either music or dancing; by preserving them from losses by imposition of crafty men, and enabling them to continue, perhaps, a profitable mercantile house, with established correspondence, till a son is grown[Pg 121] up fit to undertake and go on with it, to the lasting advantage and enriching of the family.

In 1733, I sent one of my journeymen to Charleston, South Carolina, where a printer was needed. I provided him with a press and type under a partnership agreement where I would receive one-third of the profits while paying one-third of the expenses. He was educated but not savvy with finances; although he sometimes sent me payments, I could never get a clear account of our partnership or any satisfactory updates while he was alive. After he passed away, his widow took over the business. Being born and raised in Holland, where I’ve heard that girls are taught accounting as part of their education, she provided me with the best statement of past transactions that she could find. Moreover, she kept regular and precise accounts every quarter afterward. She managed the business so well that not only did she raise a family with respect, but at the end of the term, she was able to buy the printing house from me and set her son up in it. I mention this story mainly to advocate for that aspect of education for our young women, as it can be more beneficial for them and their children in case they become widows than music or dancing. It helps them avoid losses due to deceitful men and empowers them to maintain a potentially profitable business until a son is grown up and ready to take over, benefiting and enriching the family in the long run.[Pg 121]

I had begun in 1733 to study languages; I soon made myself so much master of the French as to be able to read the books in that language with ease. I then undertook the Italian: an acquaintance, who was also learning it, used often to tempt me to play chess with him: finding this took up too much of the time I had to spare for study, I at length refused to play any more, unless on this condition, that the victor in every game should have a right to impose a task, either of parts of the grammar to be got by heart, or in translations, &c., which tasks the vanquished was to perform upon honour before our next meeting: as we played pretty equally, we thus beat one another into that language. I afterward, with a little painstaking, acquired as much of the Spanish as to read their books also. I have already mentioned that I had only one year's instruction in a Latin school, and that when very young, after which I neglected that language entirely. But when I had attained an acquaintance with the French, Italian, and Spanish, I was surprised to find, on looking over a Latin Testament, that I understood more of that language than I had imagined, which encouraged me to apply myself again to the study of it; and I met with the more success, as those preceding languages had greatly smoothed my way. From these circumstances, I have thought there was some inconsistency in our common mode of teaching languages. We are told that it is proper to begin first with the Latin, and, having acquired that, it will be more easy to attain those modern languages which are derived from it; and yet we do not begin with the Greek in order more easily to acquire the Latin. It is true, that if we can clamber and get to the top of a staircase without using the steps, we shall more easily gain them in descending; but certainly, if we begin with[Pg 122] the lowest, we shall with more ease ascend to the top; and I would therefore offer it to the consideration of those who superintend the education of our youth, whether—since many of those who begin with the Latin, quit the same after spending some years without having made any great proficiency and what they have learned becomes almost useless, so that their time has been lost—it would not have been better to have begun with the French, proceeding to the Italian and Latin. For though, after spending the same time, they should quit the study of languages and never arrive at the Latin, they would, however, have acquired another tongue or two, that, being in modern use, might be serviceable to them in common life.

I started studying languages in 1733, and I quickly became proficient in French, able to read books in that language with ease. Next, I tackled Italian: a friend who was also learning it often encouraged me to play chess with him. Realizing that this took up too much of my study time, I eventually agreed to play only if the winner of each game could assign a task to the loser, such as memorizing parts of grammar or doing translations, which the loser would have to complete before our next meeting. Since we were quite evenly matched, we helped each other learn the language this way. Later on, with a bit of effort, I also learned enough Spanish to read their books. I’ve mentioned before that I only had one year of instruction in a Latin school when I was very young, after which I completely neglected that language. However, once I became familiar with French, Italian, and Spanish, I was surprised to find that I understood more Latin than I had expected when I looked at a Latin New Testament, which motivated me to study it again; the previous languages had made it easier for me. Because of these experiences, I believe there is some inconsistency in how we typically teach languages. We’re told to start with Latin, claiming it will make it easier to learn the modern languages derived from it, yet we don’t start with Greek to make it easier to learn Latin. It’s true that if we can climb to the top of a staircase without using the steps, we can descend them with more ease later on; but if we start at the bottom, we’ll find it easier to get to the top. I’d like to suggest to those in charge of educating our youth that, since many students who start with Latin stop after a few years without making much progress—and what they learn often becomes almost useless—perhaps it would be better to start with French, then move on to Italian and Latin. Even if they ultimately abandon language study and never reach Latin, they would still have learned one or two modern languages that could be useful in everyday life.

After ten years' absence from Boston, and having become easy in my circumstances, I made a journey thither to visit my relations, which I could not sooner afford. In returning, I called at Newport to see my brother James, then settled there with his printing-house: our former differences were forgotten, and our meeting was very cordial and affectionate: he was fast declining in health, and requested of me that, in case of his death, which he apprehended not far distant, I would take home his son, then but ten years of age, and bring him up to the printing business. This I accordingly performed, sending him a few years to school before I took him into the office. His mother carried on the business till he was grown up, when I assisted him with an assortment of new types, those of his father being in a manner worn out. Thus it was that I made my brother ample amends for the service I had deprived him of by leaving him so early.

After being away from Boston for ten years and feeling secure in my situation, I took a trip back to visit my relatives, which I hadn’t been able to afford before. On my way back, I stopped in Newport to see my brother James, who had settled there with his printing business. We had put aside our past disagreements, and our reunion was warm and loving. He was in poor health and asked me that if he passed away, which he feared was soon, I would take his son, who was only ten at the time, and help him learn the printing trade. I did this, sending him to school for a few years before bringing him into the office. His mother managed the business until he was older, at which point I helped him with a set of new typefaces since his father’s were pretty worn out. In this way, I was able to make up for the support I had deprived my brother of by leaving him so early.

In 1736 I lost one of my sons, a fine boy of four years old, by the smallpox, taken in the common way. I long regretted him bitterly, and still regret that I had not given it to him by inoculation. This I mention for the sake of parents who omit that[Pg 123] operation, on the supposition that they should never forgive themselves if a child died under it; my example showing that the regret may be the same either way, and, therefore, that the safer should be chosen.

In 1736, I lost one of my sons, a great boy of four years old, to smallpox, which he caught in the usual way. I deeply regretted him for a long time and still wish I had vaccinated him. I bring this up for the sake of parents who skip that[Pg 123] procedure, thinking they could never forgive themselves if a child died from it; my experience demonstrates that the regret can be just as strong either way, so it's better to choose the safer option.

Our club, the Junto, was found so useful, and afforded such satisfaction to the members, that some were desirous of introducing their friends, which could not well be done without exceeding what we had settled as a convenient number, viz., twelve. We had, from the beginning, made it a rule to keep our institution a secret, which was pretty well observed; the intention was to avoid applications of improper persons for admittance, some of whom, perhaps, we might find it difficult to refuse. I was one of those who were against any addition to our number; but, instead of it, made in writing a proposal, that every member, separately, should endeavour to form a subordinate club, with the same rules respecting queries, &c., and without informing them of the connexion with the Junto. The advantages proposed were the improvement of so many more young citizens by the use of our institutions; our better acquaintance with the general sentiments of the inhabitants on any occasion, as the junto member might propose what queries we should desire, and was to report to the Junto what passed in his separate club: the promotion of our particular interests in business by more extensive recommendation, and the increase of our influence in public affairs, and our power of doing good by spreading through the several clubs the sentiments of the Junto. The project was approved, and every member undertook to form his club: but they did not all succeed. Five or six only were completed, which were called by different names, as the Vine, the Union, the Band, &c.; they were useful to themselves, and afforded us a good deal of amusement, information, and instruction, besides answering, in[Pg 124] some degree, our views of influencing the public on particular occasions; of which I shall give some instances in course of time as they happened.

Our club, the Junto, proved so valuable and satisfying to its members that some wanted to invite their friends. However, we had set a limit of twelve members, making it hard to do so. From the start, we agreed to keep our club a secret to prevent unwanted people from trying to join, as some might be tough to turn down. I was against adding anyone new, but instead, I proposed in writing that each member should try to create their own smaller club with the same rules about questions, etc., without telling them about the connection to the Junto. The benefits of this idea included improving more young citizens through our practices, getting to know the general opinions of the community better, as each member could suggest questions and report back to the Junto what happened in their smaller club. It would also help us promote our specific business interests through broader recommendations and increase our influence in public matters, as well as our ability to do good by spreading the ideas of the Junto through various clubs. The plan was approved, and every member took on the task of starting their club, though not all were successful. Only five or six were established, named things like the Vine, the Union, the Band, etc. They were beneficial for themselves and provided us with a lot of enjoyment, knowledge, and education while also somewhat aligning with our goals of influencing the public on certain occasions. I’ll share some examples over time as they occurred.

My first promotion was my being chosen, in 1736, clerk of the General Assembly. The choice was made that year without opposition; but the year following, when I was again proposed (the choice, like that of the members, being annual), a new member made a long speech against me, in order to favour some other candidate. I was, however, chosen, which was the more agreeable to me, as, besides the pay for the immediate service of clerk, the place gave me a better opportunity of keeping up an interest among the members, which secured to me the business of printing the votes, laws, paper money, and other occasional jobs for the public, that, on the whole, were very profitable. I therefore did not like the opposition of this new member, who was a gentleman of fortune and education, with talents that were likely to give him, in time, great influence in the house, which, indeed, afterward happened. I did not, however, aim at gaining his favour by paying any servile respect to him, but after some time took this other method. Having heard that he had in his library a certain very scarce and curious book, I wrote a note to him, expressing my desire of perusing that book, and requesting that he would do me the favour of lending it to me for a few days. He sent it immediately; and I returned it in about a week with another note, expressing strongly my sense of the favour. When we next met in the house, he spoke to me (which he had never done before), and with great civility; and he ever after manifested a readiness to serve me on all occasions, so that we became great friends, and our friendship continued to his death. This is another instance of the truth of an old maxim I had learned, which says, "He that has once done you a kindness will be more ready to do you another than he whom you yourself[Pg 125] have obliged." And it shows how much more profitable it is prudently to remove, than to resent, return, and continue inimical proceedings.

My first promotion was being selected as the clerk of the General Assembly in 1736. The choice was made that year without any objections; however, the following year, when I was nominated again (since the position is chosen annually, just like the members), a new member gave a lengthy speech against me to support another candidate. I was ultimately chosen, which pleased me even more because, in addition to the pay for being clerk, the role allowed me to maintain good relationships with the members. This secured me the job of printing the votes, laws, paper money, and other occasional public work, which turned out to be quite profitable. Therefore, I wasn't fond of the opposition from this new member, who was well-off and well-educated, with talents likely to give him significant influence in the house, which indeed happened later. I didn't try to win his favor by being servile, but instead, after some time, I took a different approach. I had heard that he owned a very rare and interesting book in his library, so I wrote him a note expressing my desire to read it and asking if he could lend it to me for a few days. He immediately sent it over, and I returned it in about a week with another note, expressing my appreciation for the favor. When we met next in the house, he spoke to me for the first time, and he did so with great politeness. He always showed a willingness to help me from that point on, and we became good friends, maintaining our friendship until his death. This is another example of the truth behind an old saying I had learned: "He that has once done you a kindness will be more ready to do you another than he whom you yourself[Pg 125] have obliged." It illustrates how much more beneficial it is to wisely remove an opposition than to harbor resentment, retaliate, and continue hostile actions.

In 1737, Colonel Spotswood, late governor of Virginia, and then postmaster-general, being dissatisfied with his deputy at Philadelphia respecting some negligence in rendering, and want of exactness in framing, his accounts, took from him his commission and offered it to me. I accepted it readily, and found it of great advantage; for, though the salary was small, it facilitated the correspondence that improved my newspaper, increased the number demanded, as well as the advertisements to be inserted, so that it came to afford me a considerable income. My old competitor's newspaper declined proportionally, and I was satisfied, without retaliating his refusal, while postmaster, to permit my papers being carried by the riders. Thus he suffered greatly from his neglect in due accounting; and I mention it as a lesson to those young men who may be employed in managing affairs for others, that they should always render accounts and make remittances with great clearness and punctuality. The character of observing such a conduct is the most powerful of recommendations to new employments and increase of business.

In 1737, Colonel Spotswood, former governor of Virginia and then postmaster-general, was unhappy with his deputy in Philadelphia for being careless with his reports and not being precise in his accounting. He took away his commission and offered it to me. I readily accepted it and found it very beneficial; the salary was small, but it made it easier to communicate, which improved my newspaper, boosted its demand, and increased the number of ads I could include, leading to a significant income. My old rival's newspaper declined accordingly, and I was content, without seeking revenge for his earlier refusal to allow my papers to be carried by the riders while he was postmaster. He really paid for his lack of proper accounting; I mention this to remind young people who manage operations for others to always present accounts and make payments clearly and punctually. Maintaining such a standard is the best way to gain recommendations for new jobs and grow your business.

I began now to turn my thoughts to public affairs, beginning, however, with small matters. The city watch was one of the first things that I conceived to want regulation. It was managed by the constables of the respective wards in turn; the constable summoned a number of housekeepers to attend him for the night. Those who chose never to attend, paid him six shillings a year to be excused, which was supposed to go to hiring substitutes, but was, in reality, more than was necessary for that purpose, and made the constableship a place of profit; and the constable, for a little drink, often got such ragamuffins about him as a watch that respectable[Pg 126] housekeepers did not choose to mix with. Walking the rounds, too, was often neglected, and most of the nights spent in tippling: I thereupon wrote a paper, to be read in Junto, representing these irregularities, but insisting more particularly on the inequality of this six-shilling tax of the constables, respecting the circumstances of those who paid it, since a poor widow housekeeper, all whose property to be guarded by the watch did not perhaps exceed the value of fifty pounds, paid as much as the wealthiest merchant who had thousands of pounds worth of goods in his stores. On the whole, I proposed, as a more effectual watch, the hiring of proper men to serve constantly in the business; and, as a more equitable way of supporting the charge, the levying of a tax that should be proportioned to the property. This idea, being approved by the Junto, was communicated to the other clubs, but as originating in each of them; and though the plan was not immediately carried into execution, yet, by preparing the minds of the people for the change, it paved the way for the law, obtained a few years after, when the members of our clubs were grown into more influence.

I started to think about public matters, beginning with smaller issues. One of the first things I noticed that needed regulation was the city watch. It was run by the constables of each ward in rotation; the constable would call on several local homeowners to join him for the night. Those who didn’t want to show up could pay him six shillings a year to opt out, which was supposed to cover hiring substitutes, but in reality, it was more than enough for that purpose and made the constableship profitable. For a little alcohol, constables often gathered a bunch of rowdy characters as the watch, making it uncomfortable for respectable homeowners to associate with them. Additionally, walking the rounds was often ignored, and most nights were spent drinking instead. I drafted a paper to be read in the Junto, outlining these irregularities, particularly focusing on the unfairness of the six-shilling tax imposed by the constables. I noted that a poor widow, with property worth maybe fifty pounds, was paying the same amount as a wealthy merchant whose goods could be valued in the thousands. Overall, I proposed hiring competent men to serve continuously in the watch, and suggested a fairer method of funding it by introducing a tax proportional to property value. This idea was approved by the Junto and shared with other clubs as if it originated from each of them. Although the plan wasn't immediately put into action, it helped prepare the public for the upcoming change and ultimately paved the way for a law passed a few years later, when the members of our clubs had gained more influence.

About this time I wrote a paper (first to be read in the Junto, but it was afterward published) on the different accidents and carelessnesses by which houses were set on fire, with cautions against them, and means proposed of avoiding them. This was spoken of as a useful piece, and gave rise to a project, which soon followed it, of forming a company for the more ready extinguishing of fires, and mutual assistance in removing and securing of goods when in danger. Associates in this scheme were presently found amounting to thirty. Our articles of agreement obliged every member to keep always in good order and fit for use a certain number of leathern buckets, with strong bags and baskets (for packing and transporting goods), which were to be[Pg 127] brought to every fire; and we agreed about once a month to spend a social evening together in discoursing and communicating such ideas as occurred to us upon the subject of fires as might be useful in our conduct on such occasions. The utility of this institution soon appeared; and many more desiring to be admitted than we thought convenient for one company, they were advised to form another, which was accordingly done; and thus went on one new company after another, till they became so numerous as to include most of the inhabitants who were men of property; and now, at the time of my writing this (though upward of fifty years since its establishment), that which I first formed, called the Union Fire Company, still subsists; though the first members are all deceased but one, who is older by a year than I am. The fines that have been paid by members for absence at the monthly meetings have been applied to the purchase of fire-engines, ladders, fire-hooks, and other useful implements for each company; so that I question whether there is a city in the world better provided with the means of putting a stop to beginning conflagrations; and, in fact, since these institutions, the city has never lost by fire more than one or two houses at a time, and the flames have often been extinguished before the house in which they began has been half consumed.

About this time, I wrote a paper (originally to be read at the Junto, but later published) about the different accidents and carelessness that could cause houses to catch fire, along with warnings and proposed solutions to prevent them. People referred to it as a helpful piece, which led to a project for creating a company dedicated to quickly extinguishing fires and helping each other protect and move belongings when at risk. We quickly gathered thirty associates for this initiative. Our agreement required each member to keep a set number of leather buckets, strong bags, and baskets (for packing and transporting items) in good condition and ready for use at every fire; we also decided to meet once a month for a casual evening to discuss and share ideas related to fire safety that could help us in those situations. The value of this organization became clear, and since there were more people wanting to join than we thought was practical for one group, we recommended forming another, which was successfully created. This pattern continued, leading to multiple companies being established until most property-owning residents were included. As I write this (more than fifty years after its founding), the first company I created, called the Union Fire Dept., is still active, though all the original members have passed away except one, who is a year older than I am. The fines collected from members for not attending the monthly meetings have been used to purchase fire engines, ladders, fire hooks, and other essential tools for each company; thus, I doubt there’s a city in the world better equipped to stop emerging fires. In fact, since these organizations were formed, the city has never lost more than one or two houses at a time to fire, and flames have often been extinguished before the house where they started was even half burned.

In 1739 arrived among us from Ireland the Reverend Mr. Whitefield, who had made himself remarkable there as an itinerant preacher. He was at first permitted to preach in some of our churches; but the clergy, taking a dislike to him, soon refused him their pulpits, and he was obliged to preach in the fields. The multitude of all sects and denominations that attended his sermons were enormous, and it was a matter of speculation to me (who was one of the number) to observe the extraordinary influence of his oratory on his hearers, and how much[Pg 128] they admired and respected him. It was wonderful to see the change soon made in the manners of our inhabitants. From being thoughtless or indifferent about religion, it seemed as if all the world were growing religious, so that one could not walk through the town in an evening without hearing psalms sung in different families of every street. And it being found inconvenient to assemble in the open air, subject to its inclemencies, the building of a house to meet in was no sooner proposed, and persons appointed to receive contributions, than sufficient sums were soon received to procure the ground and erect the building, which was one hundred feet long and seventy broad; and the work was carried with such spirit as to be finished in a much shorter time than could have been expected. Both house and ground were vested in trustees, expressly for the use of any preacher of any religious persuasion who might desire to say something to the people at Philadelphia. The design in building not being to accommodate any particular sect, but the inhabitants in general.

In 1739, the Reverend Mr. Whitefield arrived from Ireland, where he had gained recognition as an itinerant preacher. Initially, he was allowed to preach in some of our churches, but the local clergy soon took a disliking to him and refused him their pulpits, forcing him to preach in the fields. A huge crowd from all sects and denominations attended his sermons, and it fascinated me (as one of the attendees) to observe the remarkable impact of his speaking on his listeners and how much they admired and respected him. It was amazing to see how quickly the attitudes of our community changed. From being indifferent or indifferent to religion, it felt like everyone was becoming more devout, to the point where you couldn't walk through town in the evening without hearing psalms sung from various homes on every street. Since it was found inconvenient to gather outdoors due to the weather, as soon as the idea of building a place for meetings was proposed and people were appointed to collect donations, enough funds were quickly gathered to buy the land and construct a building, which measured one hundred feet long and seventy feet wide. The project moved forward so energetically that it was completed in a much shorter time than expected. Both the building and the land were entrusted to a group of trustees, specifically for the use of any preacher of any religious persuasion who wanted to address the people in Philadelphia. The intention behind the construction was to serve the entire community, not just a particular sect.

Mr. Whitefield, on leaving us, went preaching all the way through the colonies to Georgia. The settlement of that province had lately been begun; but, instead of being made with hardy, industrious husbandmen, accustomed to labour, the only people fit for such an enterprise, it was with families of broken shopkeepers and other insolvent debtors; many of indolent and idle habits, taken out of the jails, who, being set down in the woods, unqualified for clearing land, and unable to endure the hardships of a new settlement, perished in numbers, leaving many helpless children unprovided for. The sight of their miserable situation inspired the benevolent heart of Mr. Whitefield with the idea of building an orphan-house there, in which they might be supported and educated. Returning northward, he preached up this charity and made large collections, for[Pg 129] his eloquence had a wonderful power over the hearts and purses of his hearers, of which I myself was an instance. I did not disapprove of the design, but as Georgia was then destitute of materials and workmen, and it was proposed to send them from Philadelphia at a great expense, I thought it would have been better to build the house at Philadelphia, and bring the children to it. This I advised; but he was resolute in his first project, rejected my counsel, and I therefore refused to contribute. I happened soon after to attend one of his sermons, in the course of which I perceived he intended to finish with a collection, and I silently resolved he should get nothing from me: I had in my pocket a handful of copper-money, three or four silver dollars, and five pistoles in gold; as he proceeded I began to soften, and concluded to give the copper. Another stroke of his oratory made me ashamed of that, and determined me to give the silver; and he finished so admirably, that I emptied my pocket wholly into the collector's dish, gold and all! At this sermon there was also one of our club, who, being of my sentiments respecting the building in Georgia, and suspecting a collection might be intended, had, by precaution, emptied his pockets before he came from home; towards the conclusion of the discourse, however, he felt a strong inclination to give, and applied to a neighbour who stood near him to lend him some money for the purpose. The request was fortunately made to perhaps the only man in the company who had the firmness not to be affected by the preacher. His answer was, "At any other time, friend Hopkinson, I would lend to thee freely; but not now, for thee seems to me to be out of thy right senses."

Mr. Whitefield, after leaving us, traveled through the colonies to Georgia to preach. The settlement in that region had just started, but instead of being established by hardworking farmers used to labor, it was made up of families of bankrupt shopkeepers and other debtors; many were lazy and idle, taken out of prisons. Once deposited in the woods, unfit for clearing land and unable to handle the hardships of a new settlement, they perished in large numbers, leaving many helpless children without care. The sight of their miserable condition inspired Mr. Whitefield's compassionate heart with the idea of building an orphanage there, where these children could be supported and educated. Heading back north, he promoted this charity and raised substantial donations, for his eloquence had a remarkable impact on the hearts and wallets of his audience, myself included. I didn’t oppose the idea, but since Georgia lacked materials and workers and there were plans to send them from Philadelphia at great expense, I thought it would be better to build the orphanage in Philadelphia and bring the children there. I suggested this, but he was adamant about his original plan, ignored my advice, and so I decided not to contribute. Shortly after, I attended one of his sermons, during which I noticed he intended to end with a collection, and I quietly resolved not to give anything. I had some copper coins, three or four silver dollars, and five gold pistoles in my pocket; as he spoke, I started to soften and decided to give the copper. Another powerful moment in his speech made me feel ashamed of that, so I resolved to give the silver instead; he ended so brilliantly that I emptied my entire pocket into the collector's dish—gold included! At this sermon, there was also one of our club members who shared my views about building in Georgia and, suspecting a collection might happen, had emptied his pockets before coming. However, towards the end of the sermon, he felt a strong urge to donate and asked a neighbor nearby to lend him some money for that purpose. Fortunately, he asked perhaps the only person in the room who had the willpower not to be swayed by the preacher. His response was, "At any other time, friend Hopkinson, I would lend to you freely; but not now, for you seem to be out of your right senses."

Some of Mr. Whitefield's enemies affected to suppose that he would apply these collections to his own private emolument; but I, who was intimately acquainted with him (being employed in[Pg 130] printing his sermons, journals, &c.), never had the least suspicion of his integrity, but am to this day decidedly of opinion that he was in all his conduct a perfectly honest man; and methinks my testimony in his favour ought to have the more weight, as we had no religious connexion. He used, indeed, sometimes to pray for my conversion, but never had the satisfaction of believing that his prayers were heard. Ours was a mere civil friendship, sincere on both sides, and lasted to his death.

Some of Mr. Whitefield's critics pretended to think that he would use these collections for his own benefit; however, I, who knew him well (having worked in[Pg 130] printing his sermons, journals, etc.), never doubted his integrity. I still firmly believe that he was completely honest in all his actions. I think my testimony in his favor should carry more weight since we had no religious ties. He would sometimes pray for my conversion, but I never believed his prayers were answered. Our relationship was simply a civil friendship, genuine on both sides, and it lasted until his death.

The last time I saw Mr. Whitefield was in London, when he consulted me about his orphan-house concern, and his purpose of appropriating it to the establishment of a college.

The last time I saw Mr. Whitefield was in London, when he asked me for advice about his orphanage project and his plan to turn it into a college.

He had a loud and clear voice, and articulated his words so perfectly that he might be heard and understood at a great distance, especially as his auditors observed the most perfect silence. He preached one evening from the top of the courthouse steps, which are in the middle of Market-street, and on the west side of Second-street, which crosses it at right angles. Both streets were filled with his hearers to a considerable distance: being among the hindmost in Market-street, I had the curiosity to learn how far he could be heard, by retiring backward down the street towards the river, and I found his voice distinct till I came near Front-street, when some noise in that street obscured it. Imagining then a semicircle, of which my distance should be the radius, and that it was filled with auditors, to each of whom I allowed two square feet, I computed that he might well be heard by more than thirty thousand. This reconciled me to the newspaper accounts of his having preached to 25,000 people in the fields, and to the history of generals haranguing whole armies, of which I had sometimes doubted.

He had a loud and clear voice, and articulated his words so perfectly that he could be heard and understood from far away, especially since his audience maintained complete silence. One evening, he preached from the top of the courthouse steps, which are in the middle of Market Street, on the west side of Second Street, which crosses it at right angles. Both streets were packed with listeners for quite a distance. Being among the last people in Market Street, I was curious to see how far he could be heard, so I moved backward down the street toward the river, and I found that his voice was clear until I got close to Front Street, when some noise from that street drowned it out. Imagining a semicircle with my distance as the radius, filled with listeners, and allowing two square feet for each person, I calculated that he could easily be heard by over thirty thousand. This made me accept the newspaper reports of him preaching to 25,000 people in the fields, as well as the stories of generals addressing entire armies, which I had sometimes doubted.

By hearing him often I came to distinguish easily between sermons newly composed and those which[Pg 131] he had often preached in the course of his travels. His delivery of the latter was so improved by frequent repetition, that every accent, every emphasis, every modulation of voice, was so perfectly well-turned and well-placed, that, without being interested in the subject, one could not help being pleased with the discourse; a pleasure of much the same kind with that received from an excellent piece of music. This is an advantage itinerant preachers have over those who are stationary, as the latter cannot well improve their delivery of a sermon by so many rehearsals. His writing and printing from time to time gave great advantage to his enemies; unguarded expressions, and even erroneous opinions delivered in preaching, might have been afterward explained or qualified, by supposing others that might have accompanied them, or they might have been denied; but litera scripta manet—what is written remains: critics attacked his writings violently, and with so much appearance of reason as to diminish the number of his votaries and prevent their increase. So that I am satisfied that if he had never written anything, he would have left behind him a much more numerous and important sect; and his reputation might in that case have been still growing, even after his death; as there being nothing of his writing on which to found a censure and give him a lower character, his proselytes would be left at liberty to attribute to him as great a variety of excellences as their enthusiastic admiration might wish him to have possessed.

By listening to him frequently, I learned to easily tell the difference between sermons he had just created and those he had preached many times during his travels. His delivery of the latter improved so much with each repetition that every tone, emphasis, and variation in his voice was so skillfully done that even if you weren't interested in the topic, you couldn't help but enjoy the talk; it was a pleasure similar to that of listening to a great piece of music. This is an advantage that traveling preachers have over those who stay in one place, as the latter can't really improve their delivery through so many rehearsals. His occasional writing and printing gave his enemies a significant advantage; careless phrases and even wrong opinions expressed in his sermons could have been clarified or explained later, assuming they had any accompanying context, or he could have denied them. But litera scripta manet—what is written stays: critics attacked his writings fiercely, with enough apparent reason to reduce his followers and prevent them from growing. So I believe that if he had never written anything, he would have left behind a much larger and more significant group of followers; and his reputation might have continued to grow even after his death, as there would have been nothing in writing to criticize him or lower his stature, allowing his supporters to attribute an even greater variety of virtues to him as their enthusiastic admiration might suggest.

My business was now constantly augmenting, and my circumstances growing daily easier, my newspaper having become very profitable, as being for a time almost the only one in this and the neighbouring provinces. I experienced, too, the truth of the observation, "that after getting the first hundred pounds it is more easy to get the second;" money itself being of a prolific nature.[Pg 132]

My business was constantly growing, and my situation was getting easier every day, as my newspaper had become very profitable, being one of the few in this and the nearby provinces for a while. I also found the truth in the saying, "that after getting the first hundred pounds it is easier to get the second;" money tends to multiply itself.[Pg 132]

The partnership at Carolina having succeeded, I was encouraged to engage in others, and to promote several of my workmen who had behaved well, by establishing them with printing-houses in different colonies, on the same terms with that in Carolina. Most of them did well, being enabled at the end of our term (six years) to purchase the types of me and go on working for themselves, by which means several families were raised. Partnerships often finish in quarrels; but I was happy in this, that mine were all carried on and ended amicably; owing, I think, a good deal to the precaution of having very explicitly settled in our articles everything to be done by, or expected from, each partner, so that there was nothing to dispute, which precaution I would therefore recommend to all who enter into partnership; for whatever esteem partners may have for, and confidence in, each other at the time of the contract, little jealousies and disgusts may arise, with ideas of inequality in the care and burden, business, &c., which are attended often with breach of friendship and of the connexion; perhaps with lawsuits and other disagreeable consequences.

The partnership in Carolina was a success, which motivated me to start more ventures and promote several of my skilled workers by setting them up with printing houses in different colonies, just like the one in Carolina. Most of them did well, and by the end of our six-year term, they were able to buy the types from me and continue working for themselves, which helped several families to thrive. Partnerships often end in disputes, but I was fortunate that mine all went smoothly and concluded on good terms. I believe this was mainly due to the fact that we clearly outlined everything that each partner was expected to do in our agreement, so there was nothing to argue about. I would recommend this approach to anyone considering a partnership; because even if partners have mutual respect and trust at the time of the agreement, small jealousies and frustrations can emerge regarding the division of labor and responsibilities, which can lead to a breakdown of friendship and partnership, and sometimes even lawsuits and other unpleasant outcomes.

I had, on the whole, abundant reason to be satisfied with my being established in Pennsylvania; there were, however, some things that I regretted, there being no provision for defence nor for a complete education of youth; no militia, nor any college: I therefore, in 1743, drew up a proposal for establishing an academy; and at that time, thinking the Rev. Richard Peters, who was out of employ, a fit person to superintend such an institution, I communicated the project to him; but he, having more profitable views in the service of the proprietors, which succeeded, declined the undertaking: and not knowing another at that time suitable for such a trust, I let the scheme lie a while dormant. I succeeded better the next year, 1744, in proposing[Pg 133] and establishing a Philosophical Society. The paper I wrote for that purpose will be found among my writings, if not lost with many others.

I had plenty of reasons to be happy about living in Pennsylvania; however, there were some things I regretted, like the lack of defense and a proper education system for young people; there was no militia or college. So, in 1743, I put together a proposal to create an academy. At that time, I thought Rev. Richard Peters, who was unemployed, would be a good person to oversee such an institution, so I shared my idea with him. But he had other, more profitable opportunities working for the proprietors, which he pursued, so he turned down the offer. Not knowing anyone else suitable for that role, I let the idea sit for a while. I had better luck the next year, 1744, when I proposed[Pg 133] and established a Philosophical Society. The paper I wrote for that purpose should be among my writings, if it hasn't been lost with many others.

With respect to defence, Spain having been several years at war against Great Britain, and being at length joined by France, which brought us into great danger; and the laboured and long-continued endeavour of our governor, Thomas, to prevail with our Quaker assembly to pass a militia law, and make other provisions for the security of the province, having proved abortive, I proposed to try what might be done by a voluntary subscription of the people: to promote this, I first wrote and published a pamphlet, entitled Plain Truth, in which I stated our helpless situation in strong lights, with the necessity of a union and discipline for our defence, and promised to propose in a few days an association, to be generally signed for that purpose. The pamphlet had a sudden and surprising effect. I was called upon for the instrument of association; having settled the draught of it with a few friends, I appointed a meeting of the citizens in the large building before-mentioned. The house was pretty full; I had prepared a number of printed copies, and provided pens and ink dispersed all over the room. I harangued them a little on the subject, read the paper, explained it, and then distributed the copies, which were eagerly signed, not the least objection being made. When the company separated and the papers were collected, we found above twelve hundred signatures; and other copies being dispersed in the country, the subscribers amounted at length to upward of ten thousand. These all furnished themselves, as soon as they could, with arms, formed themselves into companies and regiments, chose their own officers, and met every week to be instructed in the manual exercise and other parts of military discipline. The women, by subscriptions among themselves, provided silk collours,[Pg 134] which they presented to the companies, painted with different devices and mottoes, which I supplied. The officers of the companies composing the Philadelphia regiment, being met, chose me for their colonel; but, conceiving myself unfit, I declined that station, and recommended Mr. Lawrence, a fine person and a man of influence, who was accordingly appointed. I then proposed a lottery to defray the expense of building a battery below the town, and furnished with cannon: it filled expeditiously, and the battery was soon erected, the merlons being framed of logs and filled with earth. We bought some old cannon from Boston; but these not being sufficient, we wrote to London for more, soliciting, at the same time, our proprietaries for some assistance, though without much expectation of obtaining it. Meanwhile, Colonel Lawrence, —— Allen, Abraham Taylor, Esquires, and myself, were sent to New-York by the associators, commissioned to borrow some cannon of Governor Clinton. He at first refused us peremptorily; but at a dinner with his council, where there was great drinking of Madeira wine, as the custom of that place then was, he softened by degrees, and said he would lend us six. After a few more bumpers he advanced to ten; and at length he very good-naturedly conceded eighteen. They were fine cannon, 18 pounders, with their carriages, which were soon transported and mounted on our batteries, where the associators kept a nightly guard while the war lasted: and, among the rest, I regularly took my turn of duty there as a common soldier.

Regarding defense, Spain had been at war with Great Britain for several years and was eventually joined by France, which put us in a lot of danger. Our governor, Thomas, made a long and difficult effort to convince our Quaker assembly to pass a militia law and make other arrangements for the province's security, but these attempts failed. I suggested we try raising funds through a voluntary subscription from the people. To encourage this, I wrote and published a pamphlet titled Straight Talk where I highlighted our vulnerable situation and the need for unity and discipline for our defense. I also promised to propose an association for people to sign in a few days. The pamphlet had an immediate and surprising impact. I was asked for the association document; after finalizing it with a few friends, I organized a meeting in the previously mentioned large building. The room was fairly full; I had prepared several printed copies and provided pens and ink spread throughout the space. I spoke to them briefly on the topic, read the document, explained it, and then handed out the copies, which were signed eagerly without any objections. When the meeting ended and we collected the papers, we found over twelve hundred signatures; as more copies circulated across the countryside, the total reached over ten thousand. These individuals quickly equipped themselves with arms, formed into companies and regiments, chose their own officers, and met weekly for training in the manual exercise and other aspects of military discipline. The women organized subscriptions among themselves to provide silk colors,[Pg 134] which they presented to the companies, adorned with various designs and mottos that I supplied. The officers of the Philadelphia regiment gathered and elected me as their colonel; however, feeling unfit for the position, I declined and recommended Mr. Lawrence, an excellent person of influence, who was then appointed. I then proposed a lottery to cover the costs of building a battery below the town, equipped with cannons. This filled up quickly, and the battery was erected soon after, with the merlons made of logs filled with earth. We purchased some old cannons from Boston, but these were not enough, so we wrote to London for more and also requested some assistance from our proprietors, though we didn't expect much. Meanwhile, Colonel Lawrence, Allen, Abraham Taylor, Esquires, and I were sent to New York by the associators with a mission to borrow some cannons from Governor Clinton. Initially, he outright refused us, but during a dinner with his council—where there was a lot of Madeira wine being consumed, as was customary—he gradually softened and agreed to lend us six. After a few more drinks, he raised it to ten, and finally, he kindly allowed us eighteen. They were nice cannons, 18-pounders, with their carriages, which we soon transported and mounted on our batteries, where the associators kept a nightly guard throughout the war; I regularly took my turn there as a common soldier.

My activity in these operations was agreeable to the governor and council; they took me into confidence, and I was consulted by them in every measure where their concurrence was thought useful to the association. Calling in the aid of religion, I proposed to them the proclaiming a fast, to promote reformation and implore the blessing of Heaven on[Pg 135] our undertaking. They embraced the motion; but as it was the first fast ever thought of in the province, the secretary had no precedent from which to draw the proclamation. My education in New-England, where a fast is proclaimed every year, was here of some advantage: I drew it in the accustomed style; it was translated into German, printed in both languages, and circulated through the province. This gave the clergy of the different sects an opportunity of influencing their congregations to join in the association, and it would probably have been general among all but the Quakers if the peace had not soon intervened.

My involvement in these operations was welcomed by the governor and council; they trusted me and consulted me on every decision where their agreement was seen as beneficial to the organization. With the support of religion, I suggested that we declare a fast to encourage reform and seek the blessing of Heaven on[Pg 135] our efforts. They agreed to this idea, but since it was the first fast ever proposed in the province, the secretary had no previous example to base the proclamation on. My background in New England, where a fast is announced every year, was helpful here: I wrote it in the usual format; it was translated into German, printed in both languages, and distributed throughout the province. This allowed clergy from various denominations to encourage their congregations to participate in the initiative, and it likely would have gained widespread support from everyone except the Quakers if peace hadn’t soon come about.

In order of time, I should have mentioned before, that having, in 1742, invented an open stove for the better warming of rooms, and, at the same time, saving fuel, as the fresh air admitted was warmed in entering, I made a present of the model to Mr. Robert Grace, one of my early friends, who, having an iron furnace, found the casting of the plates for these stoves a profitable thing, as they were growing in demand. To promote that demand, I wrote and published a pamphlet, entitled, "An Account of the new-invented Pennsylvania Fireplaces; wherein their construction and manner of operation is particularly explained, their advantages above every method of warming rooms demonstrated, and all objections that have been raised against the use of them answered and obviated," &c. This pamphlet had a good effect. Governor Thomas was so pleased with the construction of this stove, as described in it, that he offered to give me a patent for the sole vending of them for a term of years; but I declined it, from a principle which has ever weighed with me on such occasions, viz., That as we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously.

In terms of timing, I should have mentioned earlier that in 1742, I invented an open stove to better heat rooms while also saving fuel by warming the fresh air that came in. I gave the model to Mr. Robert Grace, an early friend of mine, who had an iron furnace and found it profitable to cast the plates for these stoves as they were becoming more popular. To support that demand, I wrote and published a pamphlet called, "An Account of the new-invented Pennsylvania Fireplaces; wherein their construction and manner of operation is particularly explained, their advantages above every method of warming rooms demonstrated, and all objections that have been raised against the use of them answered and obviated," etc. This pamphlet had a positive impact. Governor Thomas was so impressed with the stove's design as described in the pamphlet that he offered to give me a patent for exclusive rights to sell them for a number of years, but I turned it down based on a principle I’ve always held in such situations: That since we benefit greatly from the inventions of others, we should be eager to help others with our inventions, and we should do this freely and generously.

An ironmonger in London, however, assuming a[Pg 136] good deal of my pamphlet, and working it up into his own, and making some small change in the machine, which rather hurt its operation, got a patent for it there, and made, as I was told, a little fortune by it. And this is not the only instance of patents taken out of my inventions by others, though not always with the same success; which I never contested, as having no desire of profiting by patents myself, and hating disputes. The use of these fireplaces in very many houses, both here in Pennsylvania and the neighbouring states, has been, and is, a great saving of wood to the inhabitants.

An ironmonger in London, however, took a[Pg 136] significant portion of my pamphlet, adapted it into his own version, and made some minor changes to the design that negatively affected its function. He then secured a patent for it and, as I was informed, made a small fortune from it. This isn't the only case of others obtaining patents for my inventions, though they haven't always met with the same level of success. I never challenged these patents, as I had no interest in profiting from them myself and disliked conflicts. The use of these fireplaces in many homes, both here in Pennsylvania and in the neighboring states, has been, and continues to be, a huge savings in firewood for the residents.

Peace being concluded, and the association business therefore at an end, I turned my thoughts again to the affair of establishing an academy. The first step I took was to associate in the design a number of active friends, of whom the Junto furnished a good part: the next was to write and publish a pamphlet, entitled, "Proposals relating to the Education of Youth in Pennsylvania." This I distributed among the principal inhabitants gratis: and as soon as I could suppose their minds a little prepared by the perusal of it, I set on foot a subscription for opening and supporting an academy; it was to be paid in quotas yearly for five years; by so dividing it, I judged the subscription might be larger; and I believe it was so, amounting to no less, if I remember right, than five thousand pounds.

With peace established and the association business wrapped up, I focused again on the idea of starting an academy. The first step I took was to bring together a group of active friends for the project, many from the Junto. Next, I wrote and published a pamphlet called, "Proposals relating to the Education of Youth in Pennsylvania." I distributed it for free among the main residents, and once I thought they had enough time to read it, I initiated a subscription to launch and support the academy. The contributions would be paid in installments each year for five years; I believed that spreading out the payments would lead to a larger subscription, and if I recall correctly, it did, totaling no less than five thousand pounds.

In the introduction to these proposals, I stated their publication not as an act of mine, but of some public-spirited gentleman; avoiding as much as I could, according to my usual rule, the presenting myself to the public as the author of any scheme for their benefit.

In the introduction to these proposals, I mentioned that their publication wasn't my doing, but rather the work of some public-spirited gentleman; I tried as much as possible, following my usual practice, to avoid presenting myself to the public as the author of any plan for their benefit.

The subscribers, to carry the project into immediate execution, chose out of their number twenty-four trustees, and appointed Mr. Francis, then attorney-general, and myself, to draw up constitutions for the government of the academy; which being[Pg 137] done and signed, a house was hired, masters engaged, and the schools opened; I think in the same year, 1749.

The subscribers, to get the project started right away, selected twenty-four trustees from their number and appointed Mr. Francis, who was the attorney-general at the time, and me to create the rules for running the academy. Once that was done and signed, a building was rented, teachers were hired, and the schools opened; I believe it was in the same year, 1749.

The scholars increasing fast, the house was soon found too small, and we were looking out for a piece of ground, properly situated, with intent to build, when accident threw into our way a large house ready built, which, with a few alterations, might well serve our purpose: this was the building before mentioned, erected by the hearers of Mr. Whitefield, and was obtained for us in the following manner.

The number of scholars grew quickly, and our house soon felt too small. We were on the lookout for a suitable piece of land to build on when we unexpectedly came across a large, already-built house that, with a few changes, could meet our needs. This was the building I mentioned earlier, which was constructed by the followers of Mr. Whitefield, and we acquired it in the following way.

It is to be noted, that the contributions to this building being made by people of different sects, care was taken in the nomination of trustees, in whom the building and ground were to be vested, that a predominance should not be given to any sect, lest in time that predominance might be a means of appropriating the whole to the use of such sect, contrary to the original intention; it was for this reason that one of each sect was appointed; viz., one Church of England man, one Presbyterian, one Baptist, one Moravian, &c., who, in case of vacancy by death, were to fill it by election among the contributors. The Moravian happened not to please his colleagues, and on his death they resolved to have no other of that sect; the difficulty then was, how to avoid having two of some other sect, by means of the new choice. Several persons were named, and for that reason not agreed to: at length one mentioned me, with the observation that I was merely an honest man, and of no sect at all, which prevailed with them to choose me. The enthusiasm which existed when the house was built had long since abated, and its trustees had not been able to procure fresh contributions for paying the ground rent and discharging some other debts the building had occasioned, which embarrassed them greatly. Being now a member of both boards of[Pg 138] trustees, that for the building and that for the academy, I had a good opportunity of negotiating with both and brought them finally to an agreement, by which the trustees for the building were to cede it to those of the academy; the latter undertaking to discharge the debt, to keep for ever open in the building a large hall for occasional preachers, according to the original intention, and maintain a free school for the instruction of poor children. Writings were accordingly drawn; and on paying the debts, the trustees of the academy were put in possession of the premises; and by dividing the great and lofty hall into stories, and different rooms above and below for the several schools, and purchasing some additional ground, the whole was soon made fit for our purpose, and the scholars removed into the building. The whole care and trouble of agreeing with the workmen, purchasing materials, and superintending the work, fell upon me, and I went through it the more cheerfully, as it did not then interfere with my private business, having the year before taken a very able, industrious, and honest partner, Mr. David Hall, with whose character I was well acquainted, as he had worked for me four years; he took off my hands all care of the printing-office, paying me punctually my share of the profits. This partnership continued eighteen years, successfully for us both.

It’s important to note that contributions to this building were made by people from different faiths. Therefore, care was taken in selecting trustees to ensure that no one faith was favored, so that over time, that favoritism wouldn’t lead to one group taking control against the original intention. That’s why one representative from each faith was appointed: one from the Church of England, one Presbyterian, one Baptist, one Moravian, etc. In the event of a vacancy due to death, the position was to be filled by election among the contributors. The Moravian ended up not being favored by his colleagues, and when he died, they decided not to appoint another from that faith. The challenge then was to avoid ending up with two from any other group with the new choice. Several candidates were proposed but not agreed upon. Eventually, someone suggested me, noting that I was simply an honest person and belonged to no sect at all, which convinced them to choose me. The excitement that existed when the building was first erected had long diminished, and the trustees struggled to gather new funds to pay the ground rent and clear some other debts incurred by the building, which caused them significant challenges. As a member of both boards of trustees—one for the building and one for the academy—I had a great opportunity to negotiate with both sides and finally reached an agreement where the building trustees would transfer ownership to the academy trustees. The latter agreed to pay off the debt, keep a large hall open for occasional preachers in line with the original purpose, and maintain a free school for the education of low-income children. Documents were drafted accordingly, and after settling the debts, the academy trustees took over the property. By dividing the large hall into stories and different rooms above and below for the various schools, and by purchasing some additional land, the entire space was soon made suitable for our needs, and the students moved into the building. I took on all the responsibilities of negotiating with contractors, purchasing materials, and overseeing the construction, and I did so with enthusiasm, as it didn’t interfere with my private business. I had taken on a highly capable, industrious, and honest partner the year before, Mr. David Hall, with whom I was well-acquainted since he had worked for me for four years. He handled all the responsibilities of the printing office, promptly paying me my share of the profits. This partnership lasted eighteen years and was successful for both of us.

The trustees of the academy, after a while, were incorporated by a charter from the governor; their funds were increased by contributions in Britain, and grants of land from the proprietors, to which the Assembly has since made considerable addition; and thus was established the present University of Philadelphia. I have been continued one of its trustees from the beginning (now near forty years), and have had the very great pleasure of seeing a number of the youth who have received their education in it distinguished by their improved abilities,[Pg 139] serviceable in public stations, and ornaments to their country.

The academy's trustees were eventually established by a charter from the governor; their funding grew through donations from Britain and land grants from the proprietors, with the Assembly later making significant contributions as well. This led to the formation of the current University of Philadelphia. I've been a trustee since the start (almost forty years now) and have had the immense joy of witnessing many young people educated here achieve recognition for their enhanced skills, serve in public positions, and become assets to their country.[Pg 139]

When I was disengaged myself, as above mentioned, from private business, I flattered myself that, by the sufficient though moderate fortune I had acquired, I had found leisure during the rest of my life for philosophical studies and amusements. I purchased all Dr. Spence's apparatus, who had come from England to lecture in Philadelphia, and I proceeded in my electrical experiments with great alacrity; but the public, now considering me as a man of leisure, laid hold of me for their purposes; every part of our civil government, and almost at the same time, imposing some duty upon me. The governor put me into the commission of the peace; the corporation of the city chose me one of the common council, and soon after alderman; and the citizens at large elected me a burgess to represent them in Assembly; this latter station was the more agreeable to me, as I grew at length tired with sitting there to hear the debates, in which, as clerk, I could take no part, and which were often so uninteresting that I was induced to amuse myself with making magic squares or circles, or anything to avoid weariness; and I conceived my becoming a member would enlarge my power of doing good. I would not, however, insinuate that my ambition was not flattered by all these promotions: it certainly was; for, considering my low beginning, they were great things to me: and they were still more pleasing, as being so many spontaneous testimonies of the public good opinion, and by me entirely unsolicited.

When I stepped away from my private business, as mentioned earlier, I convinced myself that the reasonable, though moderate, wealth I had earned would give me the free time for philosophical studies and leisure for the rest of my life. I bought all of Dr. Spence's equipment, who had come from England to lecture in Philadelphia, and I eagerly continued my electrical experiments. However, the public, seeing me as a person with free time, began to take advantage of me for their purposes; every part of our civil government, all at once, imposed some duty on me. The governor appointed me to the peace commission; the city council elected me to the common council, and soon after, I became an alderman; the citizens, in general, elected me as a representative to the Assembly. This last position was more appealing to me, as I eventually grew tired of sitting as a clerk listening to debates in which I could not participate, and those debates were often so dull that I ended up entertaining myself by creating magic squares or circles to fend off boredom. I thought that becoming a member would enhance my ability to do good. However, I would not deny that my ambition was pleased by these promotions: it certainly was; for, considering my humble beginnings, they were significant achievements for me. They were even more gratifying as they were spontaneous acknowledgments of my public reputation, and I had not sought them out at all.

The office of justice of the peace I tried a little, by attending a few courts and sitting on the bench to hear causes; but finding that more knowledge of the common law than I possessed was necessary to act in that station with credit, I gradually withdrew from it, excusing myself by my being obliged to[Pg 140] attend the higher duties of a legislator in the Assembly. My election to this trust was repeated every year for ten years, without my ever asking any elector for his vote, or signifying either directly or indirectly any desire of being chosen. On taking my seat in the house, my son was appointed their clerk.

I tried out the role of justice of the peace by attending a few courts and sitting on the bench to hear cases. However, I realized that I needed more knowledge of common law than I had to do the job effectively, so I gradually stepped back from it, justifying my decision by saying I needed to focus on my responsibilities as a legislator in the Assembly. I was re-elected to this position every year for ten years, without ever asking any voter for their support or showing any interest in being chosen. When I took my seat in the house, my son was appointed as their clerk.

The year following, a treaty being to be held with the Indians at Carlisle, the governor sent a message to the house, proposing that they should nominate some of their members, to be joined with some members of council, as commissioners for that purpose. The house named the speaker (Mr. Norris) and myself; and, being commissioned, we went to Carlisle and met the Indians accordingly. As those people are extremely apt to get drunk, and, when so, are very quarrelsome and disorderly, we strictly forbade the selling any liquor to them; and when they complained of this restriction, we told them that, if they would continue sober during the treaty, we would give them plenty of rum when the business was over. They promised this, and they kept their promise, because they could get no rum; and the treaty was conducted very orderly, and concluded to mutual satisfaction. They then claimed and received the rum; this was in the afternoon; they were near one hundred men, women, and children, and were lodged in temporary cabins, built in the form of a square, just without the town. In the evening, hearing a great noise among them, the commissioners walked to see what was the matter; we found they had made a great bonfire in the middle of the square: they were all drunk, men and women, quarrelling and fighting. Their dark-coloured bodies, half naked, seen only by the gloomy light of the bonfire, running after and beating one another with firebrands, accompanied by their horrid yellings, formed a scene the most diabolical that could well be imagined; there was no appeasing[Pg 141] the tumult, and we retired to our lodging. At midnight a number of them came thundering at our door, demanding more rum, of which we took no notice. The next day, sensible they had misbehaved in giving us that disturbance, they sent three of their old counsellors to make their apology. The orator acknowledged the fault, but laid it upon the rum; and then endeavoured to excuse the rum by saying, "The Great Spirit, who made all things, made everything for some use, and whatever use he designed anything for, that use it should always be put to: now, when he made rum, he said, 'let this be for the Indians to get drunk with;' and it must be so." And, indeed, if it be the design of Providence to extirpate these savages, in order to make room for the cultivators of the earth, it seems not impossible that rum may be the appointed means. It has already annihilated all the tribes who formerly inhabited the seacoast.

The year after, a treaty was set to take place with the Native Americans at Carlisle, so the governor sent a message to the assembly, suggesting they nominate some of their members to join a few members of the council as commissioners for that purpose. The assembly selected the speaker (Mr. Norris) and me; once appointed, we traveled to Carlisle and met the Native Americans as planned. Since these individuals are very prone to getting drunk, and tend to be quite quarrelsome and disorderly when they do, we strictly prohibited the sale of any alcohol to them. When they complained about this rule, we informed them that if they could remain sober during the treaty, we would provide them with plenty of rum once the negotiations were complete. They agreed and managed to stick to their promise because they had no access to rum; as a result, the treaty proceeded smoothly and ended to the satisfaction of both parties. Later, they claimed and received their rum; this happened in the afternoon with nearly one hundred men, women, and children who were staying in temporary cabins arranged in a square just outside the town. In the evening, after hearing a lot of noise among them, the commissioners went to see what was happening; we discovered they had made a large bonfire in the center of the square. They were all intoxicated—both men and women—arguing and fighting. Their dark skin, mostly bare, illuminated only by the eerie light of the bonfire, showed them chasing and hitting each other with burning sticks, accompanied by their horrifying screams, creating a scene that was the most nightmarish imaginable; there was no calming the chaos, so we retreated to our quarters. At midnight, several of them came banging on our door, demanding more rum, which we ignored. The next day, realizing they had misbehaved and disturbed us, they sent three of their elder chiefs to apologize. The spokesperson admitted their wrongdoing but blamed it on the rum, trying to justify it by saying, "The Great Spirit, who made all things, made everything for some use, and whatever use he designed anything for, that use it should always be put to: and when he created rum, he said, "Let this be for the Indians to drink and get drunk.";' and it must be so." Indeed, if it is the intention of Providence to eliminate these people to make way for land cultivators, it does not seem impossible that rum might be the chosen means. It has already wiped out all the tribes that once lived along the coast.

In 1751, Dr. Thomas Bond, a particular friend of mine, conceived the idea of establishing a hospital in Philadelphia (a very beneficent design, which has been ascribed to me, but was originally and truly his) for the reception and cure of poor sick persons, whether inhabitants of the province or strangers. He was zealous and active in endeavouring to procure subscriptions for it; but the proposal being a novelty in America, and, at first, not well understood, he met with but little success. At length he came to me with the compliment, that he found there was no such a thing as carrying a public-spirited project through without my being concerned in it. "For," said he, "I am often asked by those to whom I propose subscribing, Have you consulted Franklin on this business? And what does he think of it? And when I tell them that I have not (supposing it rather out of your line), they do not subscribe, but say, they will consider it." I inquired into the nature and probable utility of the scheme, and, receiving from him a very satisfactory explanation,[Pg 142] I not only subscribed to it myself, but engaged heartily in the design of procuring subscriptions from others: previous, however, to the solicitation, I endeavoured to prepare the minds of the people, by writing on the subject in the newspapers, which was my usual custom in such cases, but which Dr. Bond had omitted. The subscriptions afterward were more free and generous; but, beginning to flag, I saw they would be insufficient without assistance from the Assembly, and therefore proposed to petition for it, which was done. The country members did not at first relish the project: they objected that it could only be serviceable to the city, and, therefore, the citizens alone should be at the expense of it; and they doubted whether the citizens themselves generally approved of it. My allegation, on the contrary, that it met with such approbation as to leave no doubt of our being able to raise two thousand pounds by voluntary donations, they considered as a most extravagant supposition, and utterly impossible. On this I formed my plan; and asking leave to bring in a bill for incorporating the contributors according to the prayer of their petition, and granting them a blank sum of money, which leave was obtained chiefly on the consideration that the house could throw the bill out if they did not like it, I drew it so as to make the important clause a conditional one, viz.: "And be it enacted by the authority aforesaid, that when the said contributors shall have met and chosen their managers and treasurer, and shall have raised by their contributions a capital stock of two thousand pounds value (the yearly interest of which is to be applied to the accommodation of the sick poor in the said hospital, and of charge for diet, attendance, advice, and medicines), and shall make the same appear to the satisfaction of the Speaker of the Assembly for the time being, that then it shall and may be lawful for the said speaker, and he is hereby required to sign an order[Pg 143] on the provincial treasurer, for the payment of two thousand pounds, in two yearly payments, to the treasurer of the said hospital, to be applied to the founding, building, and finishing of the same." This condition carried the bill through; for the members who had opposed the grant, and now conceived they might have the credit of being charitable without the expense, agreed to its passage; and then, in soliciting subscriptions among the people, we urged the conditional promise of the law as an additional motive to give, since every man's donation would be doubled: thus the clause worked both ways. The subscriptions accordingly soon exceeded the requisite sum, and we claimed and received the public gift, which enabled us to carry the design into execution. A convenient and handsome building was soon erected; the institution has, by constant experience, been found useful, and flourishes to this day; and I do not remember any of my political manœuvres, the success of which, at the time, gave me more pleasure, or wherein, after thinking of it, I more easily excused myself for having made some use of cunning.

In 1751, Dr. Thomas Bond, a good friend of mine, came up with the idea of starting a hospital in Philadelphia (a wonderful initiative that has been credited to me, but was truly his idea) to care for and treat poor sick people, whether they were locals or visitors. He worked hard to raise funds for it, but since this was a new concept in America and not initially understood well, he struggled to gather much support. Eventually, he approached me and said that he realized a public-spirited project couldn’t move forward without my involvement. "For," he said, "people often ask me when I propose the project, Have you talked to Franklin about this? What does he think? And when I tell them I haven’t (thinking it might not be your thing), they don’t donate, but just say, They’ll think about it." I looked into the idea and its potential benefits, and after getting a thorough explanation from him,[Pg 142] I not only donated myself but also actively sought donations from others. Before I started asking for contributions, I tried to prepare the public by writing about it in the newspapers, which I usually did in such cases, but Dr. Bond had not. After that, the donations became more generous; however, as they started to decline, I realized we would need help from the Assembly, so I suggested we petition for it, which we did. The country members were initially not in favor of the project. They argued that it would only benefit the city and that the citizens should bear the costs, and they questioned whether the citizens themselves actually supported it. I claimed that it had enough public support that I was confident we could raise two thousand pounds through voluntary donations, which they dismissed as completely unreasonable and impossible. With that, I devised my plan; I requested permission to introduce a bill to incorporate the contributors as they had asked and to grant them a specified amount of money, which permission was granted mainly because the house could reject the bill if they didn’t like it. I drafted it so that the key clause was conditional: "And be it enacted by the authority aforesaid, that when the said contributors shall have met and chosen their managers and treasurer, and shall have raised by their contributions a capital stock of two thousand pounds value (the yearly interest of which is to be applied for the care of sick poor people in the said hospital, including costs for food, attention, advice, and medicines), and shall make the same appear to the satisfaction of the Speaker of the Assembly for the time being, then it shall and may be lawful for the said speaker, and he is hereby required to sign an order[Pg 143] on the provincial treasurer, for the payment of two thousand pounds, in two yearly payments, to the treasurer of the said hospital, to be used for founding, building, and completing the same." This condition helped get the bill approved; the members who had opposed it now thought they could appear charitable without spending anything, and they agreed to pass it. Then, when we sought donations from the public, we emphasized the conditional promise of the law as an extra incentive because each person’s donation would be matched. This strategy worked in both directions. As a result, the donations quickly surpassed what we needed, and we accepted the public funds, allowing us to bring the plan to fruition. A suitable and stylish building was soon put up; the institution has consistently proved valuable and continues to thrive today. I can’t recall any of my political maneuvers that brought me more satisfaction at the time, or for which I felt more justified in applying a bit of strategy.

It was about this time that another projector, the Rev. Gilbert Tennent, came to me with a request that I would assist him in procuring a subscription for erecting a new meeting-house. It was to be for the use of a congregation he had gathered among the Presbyterians, who were originally disciples of Mr. Whitefield. Unwilling to make myself disagreeable to my fellow-citizens by too frequently soliciting their contributions, I absolutely refused. He then desired I would furnish him with a list of the names of persons I knew by experience to be generous and public spirited. I thought it would be unbecoming in me, after their kind compliance with my solicitation, to mark them out to be worried by other beggars, and therefore refused to give such a list. He then desired I would at least give him my[Pg 144] advice. That I will do, said I; and, in the first place, I advise you to apply to all those who you know will give something; next, to those who you are uncertain whether they will give anything or not, and show them the list of those who have given; and, lastly, do not neglect those who you are sure will give nothing, for in some of them you may be mistaken. He laughed and thanked me, and said he would take my advice. He did so, for he asked everybody, and he obtained a much larger sum than he expected, with which he erected the capacious and elegant meeting-house that stands in Arch-street.

It was around this time that another advocate, Rev. Gilbert Tennent, approached me with a request for help in raising funds to build a new meeting house. It was meant for a congregation he had gathered from the Presbyterians, who were initially followers of Mr. Whitefield. Not wanting to annoy my fellow citizens by constantly asking for their donations, I flatly refused. He then asked me to provide him with a list of people I knew who were generous and community-minded. I thought it would be inappropriate, after they had kindly supported my requests, to single them out to be bothered by other fundraisers, so I declined to give him a list. He then asked that I at least offer him my[Pg 144] advice. "I can do that," I said; "first, I suggest you approach everyone you know will donate something; next, talk to those you're unsure about and show them the list of those who have already contributed; and finally, don't overlook those you think are certain not to give anything, because you might be mistaken about some of them." He laughed, thanked me, and said he would take my advice. He did indeed follow through, as he asked everybody, and ended up collecting a much larger amount than he expected, with which he built the spacious and elegant meeting house that now stands on Arch Street.

Our city, though laid out with a beautiful regularity, the streets large, straight, and crossing each other at right angles, had the disgrace of suffering those streets to remain long unpaved, and in wet weather the wheels of heavy carriages ploughed them into a quagmire, so that it was difficult to cross them; and in dry weather the dust was offensive. I had lived near what was called the Jersey market, and saw, with pain, the inhabitants wading in mud while purchasing their provisions. A strip of ground down the middle of that market was at length paved with brick, so that, being once in the market, they had firm footing, but were often over their shoes in dirt to get there. By talking and writing on the subject, I was at length instrumental in getting the streets paved with stone between the market and the brick foot-pavement that was on the side next the houses. This for some time gave an easy access to the market dry shod; but the rest of the street not being paved, whenever a carriage came out of the mud upon this pavement, it shook off and left its dirt upon it, and it was soon covered with mire, which was not removed, the city as yet having no scavengers. After some inquiry I found a poor industrious man who was willing to undertake keeping the pavement clean, by sweeping it[Pg 145] twice a week, carrying off the dirt from before all the neighbours' doors, for the sum of sixpence per month, to be paid by each house. I then wrote and printed a paper, setting forth the advantages to the neighbourhood that might be obtained from this small expense; the greater ease in keeping our houses clean, so much dirt not being brought in by people's feet; the benefit to the shops by more custom, as buyers could more easily get at them; and by not having, in windy weather, the dust blown in upon their goods, &c. I sent one of these papers to each house, and in a day or two went round to see who would subscribe to an agreement to pay these sixpences; it was unanimously signed, and, for a time, well executed. All the inhabitants of the city were delighted with the cleanliness of the pavement that surrounded the market, it being a convenience to all, and this raised a general desire to have all the streets paved, and made the people more willing to submit to a tax for that purpose. After some time I drew a bill for paving the city and brought it into the Assembly. It was just before I went to England, in 1757, and did not pass till I was gone, and then with an alteration in the mode of assessment, which I thought not for the better; but with an additional provision for lighting as well as paving the streets, which was a great improvement. It was by a private person, the late Mr. John Clifton, giving a sample of the utility of lamps, by placing one at his door, that the people were first impressed with the idea of lighting all the city. The honour of this public benefit has also been ascribed to me, but it belongs truly to that gentleman. I did but follow his example, and have only some merit to claim respecting the form of our lamps, as differing from the globe lamps we were at first supplied with from London. They were found inconvenient in these respects: they admitted no air below; the smoke, therefore, did not readily go out[Pg 146] above, but circulated in the globe, lodged on its inside, and soon obstructed the light they were intended to afford; giving, besides, the daily trouble of wiping them clean: and an accidental stroke on one of them would demolish it, and render it totally useless. I therefore suggested the composing them of four flat panes, with a long funnel above to draw up the smoke, and crevices admitting air below to facilitate the ascent of the smoke; by this means they were kept clean, and did not grow dark in a few hours, as the London lamps do, but continued bright till morning; and an accidental stroke would generally break but a single pane, easily repaired. I have sometimes wondered that the Londoners did not, from the effect holes in the bottom of the globe-lamps used at Vauxhall have in keeping them clean, learn to have such holes in their street-lamps. But these holes being made for another purpose, viz., to communicate flame more suddenly to the wick by a little flax hanging down through them, the other use of letting in air seems not to have been thought of: and, therefore, after the lamps have been lit a few hours, the streets of London are very poorly illuminated.

Our city, although laid out with beautiful symmetry, with wide, straight streets intersecting at right angles, had the unfortunate issue of leaving those streets unpaved for a long time. During rainy weather, the heavy carriage wheels turned them into muddy swamps, making it hard to cross; and in dry weather, the dust was unbearable. I lived near what was called the Jersey market and watched, with dismay, as residents waded through mud while buying their groceries. Eventually, a strip of ground in the middle of the market was paved with bricks, which provided a solid footing once you were in the market, but people still often found themselves sinking into dirt just to get there. By discussing and writing about this issue, I eventually helped get the streets paved with stone between the market and the brick walkway next to the houses. This made it much easier to access the market without getting muddy; however, since the rest of the street wasn't paved, whenever a carriage rolled out of the mud onto the paved section, it would splash dirt everywhere, and before long, it was covered with muck, which remained since the city had no sanitation workers at the time. After some searching, I found a hardworking individual willing to keep the pavement clean by sweeping it twice a week and removing the dirt from in front of everyone’s doors for sixpence a month per household. I wrote and printed a paper outlining the benefits this small expense offered to the neighborhood; the convenience of a cleaner home since less dirt would be tracked inside, increased business for local shops as customers could easily access them, and preventing dust from blowing onto their goods in windy weather, etc. I distributed one of these papers to each house and, a day or two later, I went around to see who would agree to pay the sixpences; everyone signed unanimously, and it was carried out well for some time. All city residents loved the cleanliness of the paved area around the market, which was an advantage for everyone, sparking a collective desire to have all the streets paved, making people more willing to accept a tax for that purpose. After some time, I drafted a bill for paving the city and brought it to the Assembly. This occurred just before I went to England in 1757, and it didn’t pass until I was gone, with alterations to the assessment method that I felt were not improvements, but it did include an additional provision for lighting the streets as well, which was a significant upgrade. The idea to light the whole city was first inspired by a private citizen, the late Mr. John Clifton, who showcased the usefulness of lamps by placing one at his door. The credit for this public enhancement has also been given to me, but it truly belongs to him. I simply followed his example and have only a little credit for the design of our lamps, which differed from the globe lamps we were initially provided from London. Those lamps had issues: they didn’t allow air to enter from below; hence, smoke couldn’t escape easily through the top but circulated inside the globe, accumulating and eventually blocking the light they were supposed to provide. They also required daily cleaning, and any accidental bump could break one and render it completely useless. I then proposed building them with four flat panes, including a tall funnel on top to draw up the smoke and gaps at the bottom to allow air in, which helped the smoke rise. This design kept them clean and prevented them from dimming quickly, unlike the London lamps, which would get dark within a few hours, allowing them to stay bright until morning; and if there was an accidental bump, typically only one pane would break, which was easy to fix. I occasionally wondered why Londoners didn’t adopt the idea of adding holes at the bottom of their globe lamps, as the ones at Vauxhall did, which helped keep them clean. However, those holes were intended for another purpose: to ignite the wick more quickly using a bit of flax dangling through them. It seems they didn’t consider the benefit of letting in air, leading to poorly lit streets in London after the lamps had been on for a few hours.

The mention of these improvements puts me in mind of one I proposed, when in London, to Dr. Fothergill,[11] who was among the best men I have known, and a great promoter of useful projects. I had observed that the streets, when dry, were never swept, and the light dust carried away; but it was suffered to accumulate till wet weather reduced it to mud; and then, after lying some days so deep on the pavement that there was no crossing but in paths kept clean by poor people with brooms, it was with great labour raked together and thrown up into carts open above, the sides of which suffered some[Pg 147] of the slush at every jolt on the pavement to shake out and fall; sometimes to the annoyance of foot-passengers. The reason given for not sweeping the dusty streets was, that the dust would fly into the windows of shops and houses. An accidental occurrence had instructed me how much sweeping might be done in a little time; I found at my door in Craven-street one morning a poor woman sweeping my pavement with a birch broom; she appeared very pale and feeble, as just come out of a fit of sickness. I asked who employed her to sweep there; she said, "Nobody; but I am poor and in distress, and I sweep before gentlefolkses doors, and hopes they will give me something." I bid her sweep the whole street clean, and I would give her a shilling; this was at nine o'clock; at noon she came for the shilling. From the slowness I saw at first in her working, I could scarcely believe that the work was done so soon, and sent my servant to examine it, who reported that the whole street was swept perfectly clean, and all the dust placed in the gutter which was in the middle; and the next rain washed it quite away, so that the pavement and even the kennel were perfectly clean. I then judged that if that feeble woman could sweep such a street in three hours, a strong, active man might have done it in half the time. And here let me remark the convenience of having but one gutter in such a narrow street, running down its middle, instead of two, one on each side, near the footway. For where all the rain that falls on a street runs from the sides and meets in the middle, it forms there a current strong enough to wash away all the mud it meets with: but when divided into two channels, it is often too weak to cleanse either, and only makes the mud it finds more fluid, so that the wheels of carriages and feet of horses throw and dash it upon the foot pavement (which is thereby[Pg 148] rendered foul and slippery), and sometimes splash it upon those who are walking.

The mention of these improvements reminds me of one I suggested to Dr. Fothergill back when I was in London. He was one of the best people I’ve known and a strong supporter of useful projects. I noticed that the streets, when dry, were never cleaned, and the light dust just stayed there; it piled up until the rain turned it into mud. After sitting there for days, deep enough on the pavement that you could only walk on paths kept clear by poor folks with brooms, it was eventually raked up with a lot of effort and tossed into open carts, which would spill some of the slush every time they hit a bump, sometimes annoying passersby. The reason given for not sweeping the dusty streets was that the dust would blow into shop and house windows. One day, I learned just how much sweeping could be done in a short time when I found a poor woman sweeping the pavement outside my door in Craven Street. She looked very pale and weak, as if she had just recovered from an illness. I asked her who sent her to sweep there, and she replied, "Nobody; but I'm poor and struggling, and I sweep in front of nice people's doors, hoping they’ll give me something." I told her to sweep the whole street clean, and I’d give her a shilling. This was around nine o'clock; by noon, she came back for the shilling. Given how slowly she worked at first, I could hardly believe she had finished the job so quickly, so I sent my servant to check, and he reported that the entire street was perfectly clean, with all the dust collected in the middle gutter. The next rain washed it all away, leaving the pavement and even the gutter completely clean. I figured that if that frail woman could sweep the street in three hours, a strong, active man could have done it in half the time. And let me point out the advantage of having just one gutter running down the middle of such a narrow street, rather than two on either side near the sidewalk. When all the rainwater from the street runs from the sides and meets in the middle, it creates a strong current that washes away all the mud. However, when there are two channels, the current is often too weak to clean either, just making the mud more fluid, which causes the wheels of carriages and the hooves of horses to splash it onto the sidewalk, making it dirty and slippery for those walking by.

Some may think these trifling matters, not worth minding or relating; but when they consider that though dust blown into the eyes of a single person or into a single shop in a windy day is but of small importance, yet the great number of the instances in a populous city, and its frequent repetition, gives it weight and consequence, perhaps they will not censure very severely those who bestow some attention to affairs of this seemingly low nature. Human felicity is produced, not so much by great pieces of good fortune that seldom happen, as by little advantages that occur every day. Thus, if you teach a poor young man to shave himself and keep his razor in order, you may contribute more to the happiness of his life than in giving him a thousand guineas. This sum may be soon spent, the regret only remaining of having foolishly consumed it: but, in the other case, he escapes the frequent vexation of waiting for barbers, and of their sometimes dirty fingers, offensive breaths, and dull razors: he shaves when most convenient to him, and enjoys daily the pleasure of its being done with a good instrument. With these sentiments I have hazarded the few preceding pages, hoping they may afford hints which some time or other may be useful to a city I love (having lived many years in it very happily), and perhaps to some of our towns in America.

Some might think these trivial matters aren’t worth paying attention to or mentioning; but when you realize that dust blowing into someone's eyes or into a single shop on a windy day is minor, yet the sheer number of these moments in a crowded city and their frequent occurrence give them significance, maybe they won’t judge too harshly those who take the time to focus on these seemingly minor issues. Happiness comes not so much from rare, significant strokes of luck but from small advantages we experience every day. So, if you teach a young man in need how to shave himself and maintain his razor, you might contribute more to his happiness than if you handed him a thousand pounds. That money could be spent quickly, leaving only regret for wasting it; but in the other scenario, he avoids the hassle of waiting for barbers and dealing with their sometimes dirty hands, bad breath, and dull razors. He shaves when it’s convenient for him and enjoys the daily pleasure of using a good tool. With these thoughts in mind, I’ve put together the few pages above, hoping they might offer insights that could one day be beneficial to a city I care for (having spent many happy years there) and possibly to some of our towns in America.

Having been some time employed by the postmaster-general of America as his comptroller in regulating the several offices and bringing the officers to account, I was, upon his death in 1753, appointed jointly with Mr. William Hu—— to succeed him, by a commission from the postmaster-general in England. The American office had hitherto never paid anything to that of Britain; we were to have £600 a year between us, if we could[Pg 149] make that sum out of the profits of the office. To do this, a variety of improvements were necessary; some of these were inevitably at first expensive; so that, in the first four years, the office became above £900 in debt to us. But it soon after began to repay us; and, before I was displaced by a freak of the ministers (of which I shall speak hereafter), we had brought it to yield three times as much clear revenue to the crown as the postoffice of Ireland. Since that imprudent transaction, they have received from it—not one farthing!

Having worked for a while as the comptroller for the postmaster-general of America, managing the various offices and holding the officers accountable, I was appointed, after his death in 1753, along with Mr. William Hu——, to take his place through a commission from the postmaster-general in England. Until then, the American office had never sent any money to Britain; we were supposed to earn £600 a year between us, if we could[Pg 149] generate that amount from the profits of the office. To achieve this, we needed to implement various improvements, some of which were initially costly; as a result, in the first four years, the office ended up owing us over £900. However, it soon started to pay us back, and before I was removed due to a whim of the ministers (which I will discuss later), we had increased its clear revenue for the crown to three times that of the post office in Ireland. Since that unwise decision, they haven't received a single penny from it!

The business of the postoffice occasioned my taking a journey this year to New-England, where the college of Cambridge, of their own motion, presented me with the degree of Master of Arts. Yale College, in Connecticut, had before made me a similar compliment. Thus, without studying in any college, I am to partake of their honours. They were conferred in consideration of my improvements and discoveries in the electric branch of Natural Philosophy.

The work at the post office prompted me to take a trip this year to New England, where the college in Cambridge, on its own accord, awarded me the degree of Master of Arts. Yale College in Connecticut had previously given me a similar honor. So, without attending any college, I am set to receive their accolades. They were granted in acknowledgment of my advancements and discoveries in the electrical field of Natural Philosophy.

In 1754, war with France being again apprehended, a congress of commissioners from the different colonies was, by an order of the lords of trade, to be assembled at Albany, there to confer with the chiefs of the Six Nations concerning the means of defending both their country and ours. Governor Hamilton having received this order, acquainted the house with it, requesting they would furnish proper presents for the Indians, to be given on this occasion; and naming the speaker (Mr. Norris) and myself, to join Mr. John Penn and Mr. Secretary Peters, as commissioners to act for Pennsylvania. The house approved the nomination, and provided the goods for the presents, though they did not much like treating out of the province; and we met the other commissioners at Albany about the middle of June. In our way thither I projected and drew up a plan for the union of all the colonies under one government,[Pg 150] so far as might be necessary for defence and other important general purposes. As we passed through New-York, I had there shown my project to Mr. James Alexander and Mr. Kennedy, two gentlemen of great knowledge in public affairs, and being fortified by their approbation, I ventured to lay it before the Congress. It then appeared that several of the commissioners had formed plans of the same kind. A previous question was first taken, whether a union should be established, which passed in the affirmative unanimously. A committee was then appointed, one member from each colony, to consider the several plans and report. Mine happened to be preferred, and, with a few amendments, was accordingly reported. By this plan the general government was to be administered by a president-general, appointed and supported by the crown; and a grand council, to be chosen by the representatives of the people of the several colonies, met in their respective assemblies. The debates upon it in Congress went on daily, hand in hand with the Indian business. Many objections and difficulties were started, but at length they were all overcome, and the plan was unanimously agreed to, and copies ordered to be transmitted to the board of trade and to the assemblies of the several provinces. Its fate was singular: the assemblies did not adopt it, as they all thought there was too much prerogative in it, and in England it was judged to have too much of the democratic; the board of trade did not approve of it, nor recommend it for the approbation of his majesty: but another scheme was formed, supposed to answer the same purpose better, whereby the governors of the provinces, with some members of their respective councils, were to meet and order the raising of troops, building of forts, &c., and to draw on the treasury of Great Britain for the expense, which was afterward to be refunded by an act of Parliament laying a tax on[Pg 151] America. My plan, with my reasons in support of it, is to be found among my political papers that were printed. Being the winter following in Boston, I had much conversation with Governor Shirley upon both the plans. Part of what passed between us on this occasion may also be seen among those papers. The different and contrary reasons of dislike to my plan makes me suspect that it was really the true medium, and I am still of opinion it would have been happy for both sides if it had been adopted. The colonies, so united, would have been sufficiently strong to defend themselves: there would then have been no need of troops from England, of course the subsequent pretext for taxing America; and the bloody contest it occasioned would have been avoided: but such mistakes are not new: history is full of the errors of states and princes.

In 1754, with the threat of war with France looming again, a congress of representatives from the different colonies was called to meet in Albany by order of the lords of trade. The goal was to discuss with the leaders of the Six Nations how to defend both their territory and ours. Governor Hamilton received this order and informed the assembly, asking them to provide suitable gifts for the Native Americans for this occasion. He named the speaker (Mr. Norris) and me to join Mr. John Penn and Mr. Secretary Peters as commissioners representing Pennsylvania. The assembly approved the nominations and supplied the goods for the gifts, although they weren’t very keen on meeting outside the province, and we gathered with the other commissioners in Albany around mid-June. On our way there, I drafted a plan for uniting all the colonies under one government, to the extent necessary for defense and other significant common purposes. While passing through New York, I shared my project with Mr. James Alexander and Mr. Kennedy, two knowledgeable gentlemen in public matters, and encouraged by their approval, I decided to present it to the Congress. It soon became clear that several commissioners had developed similar plans. The first question raised was whether a union should be established, which passed unanimously. A committee was then formed, with one member from each colony, to review the various plans and report back. Mine was favored, and after a few amendments, it was reported. According to this plan, the overall government would be run by a president-general appointed and supported by the crown, along with a grand council chosen by representatives of the various colonies in their respective assemblies. The discussions in Congress continued daily, alongside the negotiations with the Indians. Many objections and challenges were raised, but in the end, they were all addressed, and the plan was unanimously agreed upon, with copies ordered to be sent to the board of trade and to the assemblies of the different provinces. Its outcome was unusual: the assemblies did not accept it because they believed it granted too much prerogative, while in England it was considered too democratic. The board of trade disapproved and did not recommend it for the king's approval: instead, another proposal was created, thought to serve the same purpose better, where the governors of the provinces, along with some members of their respective councils, would meet to oversee the raising of troops, the building of forts, etc., and would draw on the treasury of Great Britain for expenses, which would later be reimbursed by an act of Parliament imposing a tax on [Pg 151] America. My plan, along with my supporting arguments, can be found among my political writings that were published. In the following winter, while in Boston, I had extensive discussions with Governor Shirley about both plans. Some of what we discussed is also documented in those writings. The differing and conflicting reasons for disapproving my plan lead me to suspect it might have been the true compromise, and I still believe it would have benefited both sides if it had been adopted. The colonies, united in this manner, would have been strong enough to defend themselves, eliminating the need for troops from England, thereby avoiding the subsequent justification for taxing America; the violent conflict it led to could have been avoided. But such mistakes are not uncommon: history is filled with the blunders of governments and rulers.

"Look at how few people in the world,
Understand what's good for them, or even try to pursue it!"

Those who govern, having much business on their hands, do not generally like to take the trouble of considering and carrying into execution new projects. The best public measures are, therefore, seldom adopted from previous wisdom, but forced by the occasion.

Those in power, busy with their responsibilities, usually don’t want to deal with the effort of thinking through and implementing new ideas. As a result, the most effective public policies are rarely taken from past knowledge, but prompted by necessity.

The governor of Pennsylvania, in sending it down to the Assembly, expressed his approbation of the plan "as appearing to him to be drawn up with great clearness and strength of judgment, and therefore recommended it as well worthy their closest and most serious attention." The house, however, by the management of a certain member, took it up when I happened to be absent (which I thought not very fair), and reprobated it without paying any attention to it at all, to my no small mortification.

The governor of Pennsylvania, in sending it to the Assembly, expressed his approval of the plan "as it seemed to him to be written with great clarity and strong judgment, and therefore recommended it as worthy of their closest and most serious attention." However, the house, due to the actions of a certain member, took it up when I happened to be absent (which I thought was unfair) and rejected it without giving it any consideration, to my great disappointment.

In my journey to Boston this year, I met at New-York with our new governor, Mr. Morris, just arrived[Pg 152] there from England, with whom I had been before intimately acquainted. He brought a commission to supersede Mr. Hamilton, who, tired with the disputes his proprietary instructions subjected him to, had resigned. Mr. Morris asked me if I thought he must expect as uncomfortable an administration. I said "No; you may, on the contrary, have a very comfortable one, if you will only take care not to enter into any dispute with the Assembly." "My dear friend," said he, pleasantly, "how can you advise my avoiding disputes? You know I love disputing; it is one of my greatest pleasures; however, to show the regard I have for your counsel, I promise you I will, if possible, avoid them." He had some reason for loving to dispute, being eloquent, an acute sophister, and, therefore, generally successful in argumentative conversation. He had been brought up to it from a boy, his father, as I have heard, accustoming his children to dispute with one another for his diversion, while sitting at table after dinner; but I think the practice was not wise; for, in the course of my observation, those disputing, contradicting, and confuting people are generally unfortunate in their affairs. They get victory sometimes, but they never get good-will, which would be of more use to them. We parted, he going to Philadelphia and I to Boston. In returning, I met at New-York with the votes of the Assembly of Pennsylvania, by which it appeared that, notwithstanding his promise to me, he and the house were already in high contention; and it was a continual battle between them as long as he retained the government. I had my share of it; for, as soon as I got back to my seat in the Assembly, I was put on every committee for answering his speeches and messages, and by the committees always desired to make the draughts. Our answers, as well as his messages, were often tart, and sometimes indecently abusive; and as he knew[Pg 153] I wrote for the Assembly, one might have imagined that, when we met, we could hardly avoid cutting throats. But he was so good-natured a man, that no personal difference between him and me was occasioned by the contest, and we often dined together. One afternoon, in the height of this public quarrel, we met in the street; "Franklin," said he, "you must go home with me and spend the evening; I am to have some company that you will like;" and, taking me by the arm, led me to his house. In gay conversation after supper, he told us jokingly that he much admired the idea of Sancho Panza, who, when it was proposed to give him a government, requested it might be a government of blacks; as then, if he could not agree with his people, he might sell them. One of his friends, who sat next to me, said, "Franklin, why do you continue to side with those Quakers? had you not better sell them? the proprietor would give you a good price." "The governor," said I, "has not yet blacked them enough." He, indeed, had laboured hard to blacken the Assembly in all his messages, but they wiped off his colouring as fast as he laid it on, and placed it in return thick upon his own face; so that, finding he was likely to be negrofied himself, he, as well as Mr. Hamilton, grew tired of the contest and quitted the government.

During my trip to Boston this year, I met our new governor, Mr. Morris, in New York. He had just arrived from England and I had been closely acquainted with him before[Pg 152]. He brought a commission to replace Mr. Hamilton, who had resigned due to the constant disputes his instructions caused him. Mr. Morris asked me if I thought he would have an equally uncomfortable time in office. I replied, "No; in fact, you could have a very comfortable administration if you just avoid any conflicts with the Assembly." "My dear friend," he said playfully, "how can you expect me to stay out of disputes? You know I enjoy arguing; it's one of my greatest pleasures. However, to honor your advice, I promise to avoid them if I can." He had good reason to enjoy a debate since he was eloquent, a sharp debater, and typically successful in arguments. He grew up doing this, with his father encouraging his children to argue with each other for fun during dinner; but I think that practice wasn’t wise. In my experience, those who constantly argue and contradict others often struggle with their own affairs. They might win a debate now and then, but they never gain goodwill, which would serve them better. We parted ways, with him heading to Philadelphia and me to Boston. On my way back, I came across the Pennsylvania Assembly’s votes in New York, which revealed that despite his promise to me, he and the assembly were already in fierce disagreement, and it was a constant battle between them as long as he held office. I was involved too; as soon as I returned to my seat in the Assembly, I was assigned to every committee addressing his speeches and messages, often tasked with drafting our responses. Our replies and his messages were frequently sharp and sometimes downright abusive; and since he knew[Pg 153] I wrote for the Assembly, one might have thought that when we met, we were on the verge of a serious fight. But he was such a good-natured guy that our rivalry didn’t create any personal issues between us, and we often shared meals together. One afternoon, amidst this public dispute, we ran into each other on the street. "Franklin," he said, "you have to come home with me and spend the evening; I'm having some people over that you'll enjoy." So he took my arm and led me to his house. After supper, in a light-hearted conversation, he joked about how much he admired Sancho Panza's idea, who requested a government of blacks when offered one; that way, if he didn't get along with his people, he could just sell them. One of his friends, sitting next to me, asked, "Franklin, why do you still ally with those Quakers? Wouldn’t it be better to sell them? The proprietor would pay you well." "The governor," I replied, "hasn't blacked them up enough yet." He had indeed tried hard to discredit the Assembly in all his messages, but they brushed off his accusations as quickly as he made them, returning the favor and leaving his own face covered with blame. Realizing he was likely to be negrofied himself, he, like Mr. Hamilton, eventually grew weary of the fight and stepped down from the government.

These public quarrels were all at bottom owing to the proprietaries our hereditary governors; who, when any expense was to be incurred for the defence of their province, with incredible meanness, instructed their deputies to pass no act for levying the necessary taxes, unless their vast estates were in the same act expressly exonerated; and they had even taken the bonds of these deputies to observe such instructions. The assemblies for three years held out against this injustice, though constrained to bend at last. At length Captain Denny, who was governor Morris's successor, ventured to disobey[Pg 154] those instructions; how that was brought about I shall show hereafter.

These public disputes ultimately resulted from the actions of our hereditary governors. Whenever expenses needed to be covered for the defense of their province, the governors, in an incredibly selfish manner, instructed their deputies to avoid passing any laws to raise the necessary taxes unless their extensive estates were specifically exempt from those laws. They even required the deputies to sign agreements to follow these instructions. For three years, the assemblies resisted this unfairness, but they were ultimately forced to give in. Finally, Captain Denny, who succeeded Governor Morris, took the bold step of ignoring those instructions; I will explain how that happened later.

But I am got forward too fast with my story: there are still some transactions to be mentioned that happened during the administration of Governor Morris.

But I've gotten ahead of myself with my story: there are still some events to mention that happened during Governor Morris's administration.

War being in a manner commenced with France, the government of Massachusetts Bay projected an attack upon Crown Point, and sent Mr. Quincy to Pennsylvania, and Mr. Pownal (afterward Governor Pownal) to New-York, to solicit assistance. As I was in the Assembly, knew its temper, and was Mr. Quincy's countryman, he applied to me for my influence and assistance: I dictated his address to them, which was well received. They voted an aid of ten thousand pounds, to be laid out in provisions. But the governor refusing his assent to their bill (which included this with other sums granted for the use of the crown) unless a clause were inserted exempting the proprietary estate from bearing any part of the tax that would be necessary, the Assembly, though very desirous of making their grant to New-England, were at a loss how to accomplish it. Mr. Quincy laboured hard with the governor to obtain his assent, but he was obstinate. I then suggested a method of doing the business without the governor, by orders on the trustees of the loan-office, which, by law, the Assembly had the right of drawing. There was, indeed, little or no money at the time in the office, and therefore I proposed that the orders should be payable in a year, and to bear an interest of five per cent.: with these orders I supposed the provisions might easily be purchased. The Assembly, with very little hesitation, adopted the proposal; the orders were immediately printed, and I was one of the committee directed to sign and dispose of them. The fund for paying them was the interest of all the paper currency then extant in the province upon loan,[Pg 155] together with the revenue arising from the excise, which, being known to be more than sufficient, they obtained credit, and were not only taken in payment for the provisions, but many moneyed people who had cash lying by them vested it in those orders, which they found advantageous, as they bore interest while upon hand, and might on any occasion be used as money; so that they were eagerly all bought up, and in a few weeks none of them were to be seen. Thus this important affair was by my means completed. Mr. Quincy returned thanks to the Assembly in a handsome memorial, went home highly pleased with the success of his embassy, and ever after bore for me the most cordial and affectionate friendship.

War had effectively begun with France, so the Massachusetts Bay government planned an attack on Crown Point. They sent Mr. Quincy to Pennsylvania and Mr. Pownal (later Governor Pownal) to New York to seek help. Since I was in the Assembly, understood its mood, and was a friend of Mr. Quincy, he asked for my influence and support: I helped him draft his message, which was well received. They voted to provide ten thousand pounds for supplies. However, the governor refused to approve their bill (which included this and other funds for the crown) unless a clause was added to exempt the proprietary estate from paying any part of the necessary tax. Although the Assembly wanted to support New England, they were stuck on how to do it. Mr. Quincy tried hard to persuade the governor, but he remained stubborn. I then suggested a way to proceed without the governor by issuing orders on the trustees of the loan-office, which the Assembly had the legal right to draw from. At that time, there was barely any money in the office, so I proposed that the orders be payable in a year and earn five percent interest. With these orders, I believed the provisions could be easily purchased. The Assembly quickly agreed to the idea; the orders were printed, and I was appointed to sign and manage them. The funds to pay these orders would come from the interest on all the paper currency then in circulation in the province, along with revenue from the excise, which was known to be more than enough, allowing them to gain credit. They not only accepted the orders for payment of provisions but also many people with cash invested in those orders, finding them beneficial since they earned interest while held and could be used like money at any time. As a result, they were quickly bought up, and within a few weeks, none were left. Thus, this significant matter was successfully completed thanks to my efforts. Mr. Quincy expressed gratitude to the Assembly in a nice memorial, returned home very pleased with his mission's success, and always maintained a warm and friendly relationship with me.

The British government, not choosing to permit the union of the colonies as proposed at Albany, and to trust that union with their defence, lest they should thereby grow too military and feel their own strength (suspicion and jealousies at this time being entertained of them), sent over General Braddock with two regiments of regular English troops for that purpose. He landed at Alexandria, in Virginia, and thence marched to Fredericktown, in Maryland, where he halted for carriages. Our Assembly, apprehending from some information that he had received violent prejudices against them as averse to the service, wished me to wait upon him, not as from them, but as postmaster-general, under the guise of proposing to settle with him the mode of conducting, with the greatest celerity and certainty, the despatches between him and the governors of the several provinces, with whom he must necessarily have continual correspondence, and of which they proposed to pay the expense. My son accompanied me on this journey. We found the general at Fredericktown, waiting impatiently for the return of those whom we had sent through the back parts of Maryland and Virginia to collect wagons.[Pg 156] I stayed with him several days, dined with him daily, and had full opportunities of removing his prejudices, by the information of what the Assembly had, before his arrival, actually done, and were still willing to do, to facilitate his operations. When I was about to depart, the returns of wagons to be obtained were brought in, by which it appeared that they amounted only to twenty-five, and not all of those were in serviceable condition. The general and the officers were surprised; declared the expedition was then at an end, being impossible; and exclaimed against the ministers for ignorantly sending them into a country destitute of the means of conveying their stores, baggage, &c., not less than one hundred and fifty wagons being necessary. I happened to say, I thought it was a pity they had not been landed in Pennsylvania, as in that country almost every farmer had his wagon. The general eagerly laid hold of my words, and said, "Then you, sir, who are a man of interest there, can probably procure them for us, and I beg you will undertake it." I asked what terms were to be offered the owners of the wagons; and I was desired to put on paper the terms that appeared to me necessary. This I did, and they were agreed to; and a commission and instructions accordingly prepared immediately. What those terms were will appear in the advertisement I published soon as I arrived at Lancaster; which being, from the great and sudden effect it produced, a piece of some curiosity, I shall insert it at length, as follows:

The British government, not wanting to allow the colonies to unite as suggested in Albany, and to rely on that union for their defense—fearing it would make them too military and aware of their own strength (there were suspicions and jealousies towards them at the time)—sent General Braddock along with two regiments of regular English troops for that purpose. He landed in Alexandria, Virginia, and then marched to Fredericktown, Maryland, where he stopped to wait for carriages. Our Assembly, concerned about reports that he had strong biases against them for not supporting the service, asked me to meet with him, not as a representative of theirs, but as postmaster-general, under the pretense of discussing how to manage the dispatches between him and the governors of the various provinces, with whom he would need constant communication, and they offered to cover the costs. My son joined me on this trip. We found the general at Fredericktown, impatiently waiting for the return of those we had sent through the backwoods of Maryland and Virginia to gather wagons.[Pg 156] I stayed with him for several days, dined with him daily, and had ample opportunity to clear up his misconceptions by informing him of what the Assembly had done before his arrival and what they were still willing to do to aid his efforts. When I was about to leave, the report on the available wagons came in, revealing there were only twenty-five, and not all of them were in usable condition. The general and his officers were shocked; they declared the expedition was over, deeming it impossible, and criticized the ministers for sending them to a place lacking the means to transport their supplies and baggage, when at least one hundred and fifty wagons were needed. I mentioned that it was unfortunate they hadn’t been landed in Pennsylvania, where almost every farmer had a wagon. The general quickly picked up on my suggestion and said, "Then you, sir, being someone of influence there, can probably help us get them, and I ask you to take on this task." I inquired about the terms to be offered to the wagon owners, and I was asked to write down what I thought necessary. I did this, and the terms were accepted; a commission and instructions were prepared right away. The details of those terms will be included in the advertisement I published as soon as I got to Lancaster; given the significant and sudden response it elicited, it’s worth presenting in full, as follows:

"ADVERTISEMENT.

"ADVERTISEMENT."

"Lancaster, April 26th, 1753.

"Lancaster, April 26, 1753."

"Whereas, one hundred and fifty wagons, with four horses to each wagon, and fifteen hundred saddle or packhorses, are wanted for the service of his majesty's forces, now about to rendezvous at Will's Creek; and his excellency General Braddock, having[Pg 157] been pleased to empower me to contract for the hire of the same, I hereby give notice, that I shall attend for that purpose at Lancaster from this day to next Wednesday evening, and at York from next Thursday morning till Friday evening, where I shall be ready to agree for wagons and teams, or single horses, on the following terms, viz.: 1. That there shall be paid for each wagon, with four good horses and a driver, fifteen shillings per diem. And for each able horse, with a packsaddle or other saddle and furniture, two shillings per diem. And for each able horse without a saddle, eighteen pence per diem. 2. That the pay commence from the time of their joining the forces at Will's Creek (which must be on or before the 20th of May ensuing), and that a reasonable allowance be paid over and above for the time necessary for their travelling to Will's Creek and home again after their discharge. 3. Each wagon and team, and every saddle or packhorse, is to be valued by indifferent persons, chosen between me and the owner; and in case of the loss of any wagon, team, or other horse in the service, the price, according to such valuation, is to be allowed and paid. 4. Seven days' pay is to be advanced and paid in hand by me to the owner of each wagon and team, or horse, at the time of contracting, if required; and the remainder to be paid by General Braddock, or by the paymaster of the army, at the time of their discharge; or from time to time, as it shall be demanded. 5. No drivers of wagons or persons taking care of the hired horses are, on any account, to be called upon to do the duty of soldiers, or be otherwise employed than in conducting or taking care of their carriages or horses. 6. All oats, Indian corn, or other forage that wagons or horses bring to the camp, more than is necessary for the subsistence of the horses, is to be taken for the use of the army, and a reasonable price paid for the same.[Pg 158]

"Right now, one hundred and fifty wagons, each with four horses, along with fifteen hundred saddle or packhorses, are needed for the service of His Majesty's forces gathering at Will's Creek. His Excellency General Braddock has authorized me to arrange the hiring of these vehicles and animals. Therefore, I'm announcing that I will be in Lancaster from today until next Wednesday evening, and in York from next Thursday morning until Friday evening, ready to negotiate for wagons and teams, or individual horses, under the following terms: 1. Each wagon with four good horses and a driver will receive fifteen shillings per day. Each available horse with a packsaddle or other equipment will receive two shillings per day. Each available horse without a saddle will receive eighteen pence per day. 2. Payment will start from the time they join the forces at Will's Creek (which must be by May 20th at the latest). Additionally, a reasonable amount will be paid for the time it takes to travel to Will's Creek and back home after discharge. 3. Each wagon and team, as well as every saddle or packhorse, will be evaluated by impartial individuals chosen by me and the owner; if any wagon, team, or horse is lost during service, the value determined by this assessment will be compensated. 4. I will advance seven days' pay to the owner of each wagon and team or horse at the time of contracting, if requested; the remaining amount will be paid by General Braddock or the army paymaster upon discharge, or as needed. 5. No wagon drivers or caretakers of the hired horses will be required to perform soldier duties or be employed in any way other than managing their vehicles or horses. 6. Any oats, corn, or other forage that wagons or horses bring to camp, exceeding what is necessary for the horses' needs, will be taken for the army's use, with a reasonable price paid for it."

"Note.—My son, William Franklin, is empowered to enter into like contracts with any person in Cumberland county.

Note.—My son, William Franklin, is authorized to enter into similar contracts with anyone in Cumberland County.

"B. Franklin."

"B. Franklin."

I received of the general about eight hundred pounds, to be disbursed in advance-money to the wagon owners, &c.; but that sum being insufficient, I advanced upward of two hundred pounds more; and in two weeks, the one hundred and fifty wagons, with two hundred and fifty-nine carrying horses, were on their march for the camp. The advertisement promised payment according to the valuation, in case any wagons or horses should be lost. The owners, however, alleging they did not know General Braddock, or what dependance might be had on his promise, insisted on my bond for the performance, which I accordingly gave them.

I received about eight hundred pounds from the general to be used as advance money for the wagon owners, etc.; however, that amount wasn’t enough, so I added over two hundred pounds myself. Within two weeks, one hundred and fifty wagons with two hundred and fifty-nine horses were on their way to the camp. The advertisement promised payment based on the valuation if any wagons or horses were lost. However, the owners claimed they didn’t know General Braddock or how reliable his promise was, so they insisted I provide a bond to ensure payment, which I did.

While I was at the camp, supping one evening with the officers of Colonel Dunbar's regiment, he represented to me his concern for the subalterns, who, he said, were generally not in affluence, and could ill afford, in this dear country, to lay in the stores that might be necessary in so long a march through a wilderness where nothing was to be purchased. I commiserated their case, and resolved to endeavour procuring them some relief. I said nothing, however, to him of my intention, but wrote the next morning to the committee of Assembly, who had the disposition of some public money, warmly recommending the case of these officers to their consideration, and proposing that a present should be sent them of necessaries and refreshments. My son, who had some experience of a camp life and of its wants, drew up a list for me, which I enclosed in my letter. The committee approved, and used such diligence that, conducted by my son, the stores arrived at the camp as soon as[Pg 159] the wagons. They consisted of twenty parcels, each containing

While I was at the camp, having dinner one evening with the officers of Colonel Dunbar's regiment, he expressed his worry for the junior officers, who, he said, were usually not well-off and could hardly afford, in this expensive country, to stock up on supplies that might be necessary for such a long march through a wilderness where nothing could be bought. I felt sympathy for their situation and decided to try to get them some help. However, I didn’t mention my plan to him; instead, I wrote the next morning to the Assembly committee that managed some public funds, strongly recommending the officers' situation for their consideration and suggesting that they send a gift of essentials and refreshments. My son, who had some experience with camp life and its needs, put together a list for me, which I included in my letter. The committee agreed and acted so swiftly that, led by my son, the supplies arrived at the camp as soon as[Pg 159] the wagons. They consisted of twenty parcels, each containing

6 lbs. Loaf Sugar,
6 do. Muscovado do.,
1 do. Green Tea,
1 do. Bohea do.,
6 do. Ground Coffee,
6 do. Chocolate,
1-2 chest best white Biscuit,
1-2 lb. Pepper,
1 quart white Vinegar,
1 Gloucester Cheese,
1 keg containing 20 lbs. good Butter,
2 doz. old Madeira Wine,
2 gallons Jamaica Spirits,
1 bottle Flour of Mustard,
2 well-cured Hams,
1-2 dozen dried Tongues,
6 lbs. Rice,
6 do. Raisins.

6 lbs. loaf sugar,
6 lbs. muscovado sugar,
1 lb. green tea,
1 lb. bohea tea,
6 lbs. ground coffee,
6 lbs. chocolate,
1-2 lbs. of the best white biscuits,
1-2 lbs. of pepper,
1 quart of white vinegar,
1 Gloucester cheese,
1 keg containing 20 lbs. of good butter,
2 dozen old Madeira wine,
2 gallons of Jamaica rum,
1 bottle of mustard flour,
2 well-cured hams,
1-2 dozen dried tongues,
6 lbs. rice,
6 lbs. raisins.

These parcels, well packed, were placed on as many horses, each parcel, with the horse, being intended as a present for one officer. They were very thankfully received, and the kindness acknowledged by letters to me from the colonels of both regiments, in the most grateful terms. The general, too, was highly satisfied with my conduct in procuring him the wagons, &c., &c., and readily paid my account of disbursements; thanking me repeatedly, and requesting my farther assistance in sending provisions after him. I undertook this also, and was busily employed in it till we heard of his defeat; advancing for the service, of my own money, upward of one thousand pounds sterling, of which I sent him an account. It came to his hands, luckily for me, a few days before the battle, and he returned me immediately an order on the paymaster for the round sum of one thousand pounds, leaving the remainder to the next account. I consider this[Pg 160] payment as good luck, having never been able to obtain that remainder, of which more hereafter.

These well-packed packages were placed on several horses, with each package intended as a gift for an officer. They were received with great appreciation, and the colonels of both regiments expressed their gratitude in letters to me, using the most thankful language. The general was also very pleased with how I handled getting him the wagons and so on, and he promptly reimbursed my expenses, thanking me repeatedly and asking for my help in sending provisions after him. I took that on as well and was busy with it until we learned about his defeat; I advanced more than a thousand pounds sterling of my own money for this service, which I detailed in an account I sent to him. Thankfully, he received it just a few days before the battle and immediately sent me an order from the paymaster for the total sum of one thousand pounds, leaving the rest for the next account. I consider this[Pg 160] payment as fortunate, as I have never been able to recover that remaining amount, more on that later.

This general was, I think, a brave man, and might probably have made a figure as a good officer in some European war; but he had too much self-confidence, too high an opinion of the validity of regular troops, and too mean a one of both Americans and Indians. George Croghan, our Indian interpreter, joined him on his march with one hundred of those people, who might have been of great use to his army as guides, scouts, &c., if he had treated them kindly; but he slighted and neglected them, and they gradually left him. In conversation with him one day, he was giving me some account of his intended progress. "After taking Fort Duquesne," said he, "I am to proceed to Niagara; and having taken that, to Frontenac, if the season will allow time, and I suppose it will; for Duquesne can hardly detain me above three or four days; and then I see nothing that can obstruct my march to Niagara." Having before revolved in my mind the long line his army must make in their march by a very narrow road, to be cut for them through the woods and bushes; and also what I had read of a former defeat of fifteen hundred French who invaded the Illinois country, I had conceived some doubts and some fears for the event of the campaign. But I ventured only to say, "To be sure, sir, if you arrive well before Duquesne, with the fine troops so well provided with artillery, the fort, though completely fortified, and assisted with a very strong garrison, can probably make but a short resistance. The only danger I apprehend of obstruction to your march is from the ambuscades of the Indians, who, by constant practice, are dexterous in laying and executing them: and the slender line, near four miles long, which your army must make, may expose it to be attacked by surprise in its flanks, and to be cut like a thread into several pieces, which,[Pg 161] from their distance, cannot come up in time to support each other." He smiled at my ignorance, and replied, "These savages may indeed be a formidable enemy to your raw American militia; but upon the king's regular and disciplined troops, sir, it is impossible they should make any impression." I was conscious of an impropriety in my disputing with a military man in matters of his profession, and said no more. The enemy, however, did not take the advantage of his army which I apprehend its long line of march exposed it to, but let it advance without interruption till within nine miles of the place; and then, when more in a body (for it had just passed a river, where the front had halted till all were come over), and in a more open part of the woods than any it had passed, attacked its advanced guard by a heavy fire from behind trees and bushes; which was the first intelligence the general had of an enemy's being near him. This guard being disordered, the general hurried the troops up to their assistance, which was done in great confusion, through wagons, baggage, and cattle; and presently the fire came upon their flank: the officers, being on horseback, were more easily distinguished, picked out as marks, and fell very fast; and the soldiers were crowded together in a huddle, having or hearing no orders, and standing to be shot at till two thirds of them were killed; and then, being seized with a panic, the remainder fled with precipitation. The wagoners took each a horse out of his team and scampered; their example was immediately followed by others; so that all the wagons, provisions, artillery, and stores were left to the enemy. The general, being wounded, was brought off with difficulty; his secretary, Mr. Shirley, was killed by his side; and out of eighty-six officers, sixty-three were killed or wounded, and seven hundred and fourteen men killed out of eleven hundred. These eleven hundred had been picked men[Pg 162] from the whole army; the rest had been left behind with Colonel Dunbar, who was to follow with the heavier part of the stores, provisions, and baggage. The fliers, not being pursued, arrived at Dunbar's camp, and the panic they brought with them instantly seized him and all his people. And though he had now above one thousand men, and the enemy who had beaten Braddock did not at most exceed four hundred Indians and French together, instead of proceeding and endeavouring to recover some of the lost honour, he ordered all the stores, ammunition, &c., to be destroyed, that he might have more horses to assist his flight towards the settlements, and less lumber to remove. He was there met with requests from the Governor of Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania, that he would post his troops on the frontiers, so as to afford some protection to the inhabitants; but he continued his hasty march through all the country, not thinking himself safe till he arrived at Philadelphia, where the inhabitants could protect him. This whole transaction gave us Americans the first suspicion that our exalted ideas of the prowess of British regular troops had not been well founded.

This general was, I think, a brave man and could have made a good officer in some European war; but he had too much self-confidence, too high an opinion of regular troops, and too low an opinion of both Americans and Indians. George Croghan, our Indian interpreter, joined him on his march with one hundred of those people who could have been very useful to his army as guides and scouts if he had treated them well; but he ignored and neglected them, and they gradually left him. One day, during a conversation, he told me about his plans. "After taking Fort Duquesne," he said, "I’ll move on to Niagara, and after that, Frontenac, if the season allows, which I think it will; since Duquesne can hardly delay me more than three or four days; and I see nothing that could block my path to Niagara." I had previously considered the long line his army would have to make while marching down a very narrow road, cut through the woods and bushes; and based on what I'd read about a previous defeat of fifteen hundred French who invaded the Illinois territory, I had some doubts and fears about the campaign's outcome. But I only said, "Of course, sir, if you get to Duquesne with your well-equipped troops and artillery, the fort, even though it's fully fortified and has a strong garrison, should only be able to resist for a short time. The only danger I see to your march comes from ambushes by the Indians, who are skilled at laying and executing them; and the thin line, nearly four miles long, that your army must form could make it vulnerable to surprise attacks from the sides, and could be easily cut into several pieces, which, due to their distance, wouldn't be able to come together in time to support one another." He smiled at my ignorance and replied, "These savages may indeed be a serious threat to your inexperienced American militia; but for the king's regular and disciplined troops, sir, they could hardly make any impact." I felt it was inappropriate to argue with a military man about his field of expertise, so I said no more. The enemy, however, did not take advantage of the risks posed by his army’s long march, allowing it to progress without interruption until it was just nine miles from the destination; then, when the troops were more grouped together (after just crossing a river where the front had waited for everyone to catch up), and in a more open area of the woods, they attacked the advanced guard with heavy fire from behind trees and bushes; this was the first indication the general had that an enemy was near. This guard was thrown into disarray, and the general rushed the troops to help, which was done in great confusion, navigating through wagons, baggage, and cattle; and soon the fire came upon their flank: the officers, being on horseback, were more easily seen and quickly targeted, and fell rapidly; the soldiers were crowded together, having received no orders, and stood there being shot at until two-thirds of them were killed; then, in a panic, the rest fled in a hurry. The wagon drivers took a horse from each team and made a run for it; others quickly followed their example, leaving all the wagons, food, artillery, and supplies for the enemy. The general, wounded, was taken away with difficulty; his secretary, Mr. Shirley, was killed beside him; and out of eighty-six officers, sixty-three were killed or wounded, and seven hundred fourteen men out of eleven hundred were killed. These eleven hundred had been the best men chosen from the entire army; the others had stayed behind with Colonel Dunbar, who was supposed to follow with the heavier supplies and baggage. The fleeing soldiers, not being pursued, reached Dunbar's camp, and the panic they brought with them quickly spread to him and his men. And although he now had over a thousand men, and the enemy that had defeated Braddock numbered no more than four hundred Indians and French combined, instead of advancing to try to regain some lost honor, he ordered all the supplies and ammunition to be destroyed, to free up more horses for his escape towards the settlements, and to carry less stuff with him. He was then met with requests from the governors of Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania to position his troops on the frontiers for the protection of residents; but he continued his hasty retreat through the countryside, believing he wouldn't be safe until he reached Philadelphia, where the locals could protect him. This entire event gave us Americans our first doubt that our high opinions of British regular troops’ strength had been misplaced.

In their first march, too, from their landing till they got beyond the settlements, they had plundered and stripped the inhabitants, totally ruining some poor families, besides insulting, abusing, and confining the people if they remonstrated. This was enough to put us out of conceit of such defenders, if we had really wanted any. How different was the conduct of our French friends in 1781, who, during a march through the most inhabited part of our country, from Rhode Island to Virginia, near seven hundred miles, occasioned not the smallest complaint for the loss of a pig, a chicken, or even an apple!

In their first march, from the moment they landed until they moved beyond the settlements, they looted and stripped the locals, completely ruining some poor families, in addition to insulting, abusing, and detaining anyone who protested. This was enough to make us lose any respect we had for such defenders, if we had actually wanted any. How different was the behavior of our French allies in 1781, who, during their march through the most populated areas of our country, from Rhode Island to Virginia—almost seven hundred miles—didn’t provoke even the slightest complaint about the loss of a pig, a chicken, or even an apple!

Captain Orme, who was one of the general's aidsdecamp, and being grievously wounded, was[Pg 163] brought off with him, and continued with him to his death, which happened in a few days, told me he was totally silent all the first day, and at night only said, "Who would have thought it?" That he was silent again the following day, saying only at last, "We shall better know how to deal with them another time;" and died in a few minutes after.

Captain Orme, who was one of the general's aides-de-camp and was seriously injured, was[Pg 163] taken with him and stayed by his side until his death a few days later. He told me that the general was completely silent on the first day, and at night he only said, "Who would have thought it?" The following day, he was silent again, only finally saying, "We shall better know how to deal with them another time," just minutes before he passed away.

The secretary's papers, with all the general's orders, instructions, and correspondence, falling into the enemy's hands, they selected and translated into French a number of the articles, which they printed, to prove the hostile intentions of the British court before the declaration of war. Among these I saw some letters of the general to the ministry, speaking highly of the great service I had rendered the army, and recommending me to their notice. David Hume, who was some years after secretary to Lord Hertford when minister in France, and afterward to General Conway when secretary of state, told me he had seen among the papers in that office letters from Braddock highly recommending me. But the expedition having been unfortunate, my service, it seems, was not thought of much value, for those recommendations were never of any use to me. As to rewards from himself, I asked only one, which was, that he would give orders to his officers not to enlist any more of our bought servants, and that he would discharge such as had been already enlisted. This he readily granted, and several were accordingly returned to their masters on my application. Dunbar, when the command devolved on him, was not so generous. He being at Philadelphia on his retreat, or, rather, flight, I applied to him for the discharge of the servants of three poor farmers of Lancaster county that he had enlisted, reminding him of the late general's orders on that head. He promised me that, if the masters would come to him at Trenton, where he should be in a few days on his march to New-York, he would[Pg 164] there deliver their men to them. They accordingly were at the expense and trouble of going to Trenton, and there he refused to perform his promise, to their great loss and disappointment.

The secretary's files, which included all the general's orders, instructions, and correspondence, fell into enemy hands. They picked several of the documents, translated them into French, and published them to demonstrate the British court's hostile intentions before the war was declared. Among these documents, I found some letters from the general to the ministry, praising the significant contributions I had made to the army and recommending me for their attention. David Hume, who later served as secretary to Lord Hertford when he was the minister in France and then to General Conway when he was the secretary of state, told me he had seen letters from Braddock in that office that highly recommended me. However, since the expedition turned out badly, my service apparently didn't hold much value, and those recommendations never helped me. As for rewards from him, I asked for just one thing: that he would instruct his officers not to recruit any more of our hired servants, and that he would discharge those who had already been enlisted. He agreed immediately, and several were returned to their masters at my request. However, when command passed to Dunbar, he wasn't so generous. While he was in Philadelphia during his retreat, or rather, his flight, I approached him about the discharge of the servants belonging to three poor farmers from Lancaster County that he had enlisted, reminding him of the previous general's orders on that matter. He promised that if the farmers came to him in Trenton, where he would be in a few days on his way to New York, he would deliver their men to them there. They then went through the expense and trouble of traveling to Trenton, only for him to go back on his promise, causing them great loss and disappointment.

As soon as the loss of the wagons and horses was generally known, all the owners came upon me for the valuation which I had given bond to pay. Their demands gave me a great deal of trouble: I acquainted them that the money was ready in the paymaster's hands, but the order for paying it must first be obtained from General Shirley, and that I had applied for it; but he being at a distance, an answer could not soon be received, and they must have patience. All this, however, was not sufficient to satisfy, and some began to sue me: General Shirley at length relieved me from this terrible situation, by appointing commissioners to examine the claims, and ordering payment. They amounted to near twenty thousand pounds, which to pay would have ruined me.

As soon as people found out about the loss of the wagons and horses, all the owners came to me demanding the payment I had promised to cover. Their requests caused me a lot of stress. I informed them that the money was ready with the paymaster, but I needed to get an order for the payment from General Shirley first. I had already requested it, but he was far away, so I wouldn’t get a response right away, and they would have to be patient. Nevertheless, this didn’t satisfy everyone, and some even started to sue me. Eventually, General Shirley helped me out of this awful situation by appointing commissioners to review the claims and ordering the payment. They totaled nearly twenty thousand pounds, and paying that would have bankrupted me.

Before we had the news of this defeat, the two Doctors Bond came to me with a subscription-paper for raising money to defray the expense of a grand fireworks, which it was intended to exhibit at a rejoicing on receiving the news of our taking Fort Duquesne. I looked grave, and said, "It would, I thought, be time enough to prepare the rejoicing when we knew we should have occasion to rejoice." They seemed surprised that I did not immediately comply with their proposal. "Why the d—l," said one of them, "you surely don't suppose that the fort will not be taken?" "I don't know that it will not be taken; but I know that the events of war are subject to great uncertainty." I gave them the reasons of my doubting: the subscription was dropped, and the projectors thereby missed the mortification they would have undergone if the fireworks had been prepared. Dr. Bond, on some other occasion afterward, said that he did not like Franklin's forebodings.[Pg 165]

Before we heard about this defeat, the two Dr. Bonds came to me with a petition to raise funds for a big fireworks display that was planned to celebrate the news of us capturing Fort Duquesne. I looked serious and said, "I think it’s a bit premature to plan for a celebration until we know for sure we have something to celebrate." They seemed surprised that I didn't just agree to their request right away. "What the hell," one of them said, "you can’t seriously think the fort won’t be taken, right?" "I don’t know if it will be taken; but I do know that the outcomes of war are very unpredictable." I explained my reasons for my doubts: the subscription was dropped, and the planners avoided the embarrassment they would have faced if the fireworks had been set up. Later on, Dr. Bond mentioned that he didn’t like Franklin’s pessimistic predictions.[Pg 165]

Governor Morris, who had continually worried the Assembly with message after message, before the defeat of Braddock, to beat them into the making of acts to raise money for the defence of the province, without taxing, among others, the proprietary estates, and had rejected all their bills for not having such an exempting clause, now redoubled his attacks with more hope of success, the danger and necessity being greater. The Assembly, however, continued firm, believing they had justice on their side, and that it would be giving up an essential right if they suffered the governor to amend their money-bills. In one of the last, indeed, which was for granting fifty thousand pounds, his proposed amendment was only of a single word: the bill expressed "that all estates, real and personal, were to be taxed; those of the proprietaries not excepted." His amendment was, for not read only. A small but very material alteration! However, when the news of the disaster reached England, our friends there, whom we had taken care to furnish will all the Assembly's answers to the governor's messages, raised a clamour against the proprietaries for their meanness and injustice in giving their governor such instructions; some going so far as to say that, by obstructing the defence of their province, they forfeited their right to it. They were intimidated by this, sent orders to their receiver-general to add five thousand pounds of their money to whatever sum might be given by the Assembly for such purpose. This being testified to the house, was accepted in lieu of their share of a general tax, and a new bill was formed, with an exempting clause, which passed accordingly. By this act I was appointed one of the commissioners for disposing of the money, sixty thousand pounds. I had been active in modelling the bill and procuring its passage, and had, at the same time, drawn one for establishing and disciplining a voluntary militia, which[Pg 166] I carried through the house without much difficulty, as care was taken in it to leave the Quakers at liberty. To promote the association necessary to form the militia, I wrote a dialogue stating and answering all the objections I could think of to such a militia, which was printed, and had, as I thought great effect. While the several companies in the city and country were forming and learning their exercise, the governor prevailed with me to take charge of our northwestern frontier, which was infested by the enemy, and provide for the defence of the inhabitants by raising troops and building a line of forts. I undertook this military business, though I did not conceive myself well qualified for it. He gave me a commission, with full powers, and a parcel of blank commissions for officers, to be given to whom I thought fit. I had but little difficulty in raising men, having soon five hundred and sixty under my command. My son, who had in the preceding war been an officer in the army raised against Canada, was my aiddecamp, and of great use to me. The Indians had burned Gnadenhutten, a village settled by the Moravians, and massacred the inhabitants; but the place was thought a good situation for one of the forts. In order to march thither, I assembled the companies at Bethlehem, the chief establishment of those people; I was surprised to find it in so good a posture of defence; the destruction of Gnadenhutten had made them apprehend danger. The principal buildings were defended by a stockade; they had purchased a quantity of arms and ammunition from New-York, and had even placed quantities of small paving stones between the windows of their high stone houses, for their women to throw them down upon the heads of any Indians that should attempt to force into them. The armed brethren, too, kept watch, and relieved each other on guard as methodically as in any garrison town. In conversation with the bishop,[Pg 167] Spangenberg, I mentioned my surprise; for, knowing that they had obtained an act of parliament exempting them from military duties in the colonies, I had supposed they were conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms. He answered me, "That it was not one of their established principles; but that, at the time of their obtaining that act, it was thought to be a principle with many of their people. On this occasion, however, they, to their surprise, found it adopted by but a few." It seems they were either deceived in themselves or deceived the parliament; but common sense, aided by present danger, will sometimes be too strong for whimsical opinions.

Governor Morris, who had constantly bothered the Assembly with message after message before Braddock's defeat, urging them to create laws to raise funds for the province's defense without taxing the proprietary estates, which he had rejected all their bills for lacking such an exempting clause, now intensified his efforts with more hope of success, given the increased danger and necessity. However, the Assembly remained steadfast, believing they were on the side of justice and that it would mean giving up an essential right if they allowed the governor to modify their funding bills. In one of the last proposed bills for granting fifty thousand pounds, his suggested amendment was just a single word: the bill stated "that all estates, real and personal, were to be taxed; those of the proprietors not excepted." His amendment was to change not to only. A minor but very significant change! However, when news of the disaster reached England, our friends there, to whom we had made sure to provide all the Assembly's responses to the governor's messages, raised an outcry against the proprietors for their meanness and injustice in giving their governor such instructions; some even suggested that by obstructing the defense of their province, they forfeited their rights to it. They were intimidated by this and sent orders to their receiver-general to contribute five thousand pounds of their funds to whatever amount might be provided by the Assembly for that purpose. This was reported to the house and accepted in place of their share of a general tax, and a new bill was drafted with an exempting clause, which passed as expected. By this act, I was appointed one of the commissioners to manage the funds, which totaled sixty thousand pounds. I had been proactive in shaping the bill and ensuring its passage, and at the same time, I drafted one to establish and organize a voluntary militia, which[Pg 166] I managed to get through the house without much trouble, as it was designed to leave the Quakers free. To promote the necessary association to form the militia, I wrote a dialogue addressing all the objections I could think of regarding such a militia, which was printed and I believed had a significant impact. While the various companies in both the city and countryside were being formed and learning their drills, the governor convinced me to take charge of our northwestern frontier, which was threatened by enemy forces, and to ensure the defense of the inhabitants by raising troops and constructing a line of forts. I agreed to this military role, though I didn't feel particularly qualified for it. He issued me a commission with full authority and a batch of blank commissions for officers to be given to whoever I deemed suitable. I had little trouble attracting recruits and quickly commanded five hundred and sixty men. My son, who had served as an officer in the previous war against Canada, was my aide-de-camp and was invaluable to me. The Indians had burned Gnadenhutten, a village settled by the Moravians, and massacred its residents; however, the location was considered a good site for one of the forts. To march there, I gathered the companies at Bethlehem, the main settlement of those people; I was surprised to see it well-prepared for defense; the destruction of Gnadenhutten had made them alert to the threat. The main buildings were protected by a stockade; they had purchased a significant quantity of arms and ammunition from New York, and even placed small paving stones between the windows of their large stone houses for the women to drop on the heads of any Indians trying to break in. The armed brethren also kept watch and rotated guard duty as systematically as in any garrison town. While talking with the bishop,[Pg 167] Spangenberg, I expressed my surprise; knowing that they had obtained a law that exempted them from military duties in the colonies, I had assumed they were genuinely opposed to bearing arms. He replied, "That it wasn't one of their core beliefs; but at the time of getting that law, it was considered a principle by many of their people. However, on this occasion, they were surprised to find it adopted by only a few." It seems they either misjudged themselves or misled the parliament; yet common sense, bolstered by immediate danger, can sometimes overpower whimsical beliefs.

It was the beginning of January when we set out upon this business of building forts; I sent one detachment towards the Minisink, with instructions to erect one for the security of that upper part of the country, and another to the lower part with similar instructions; and I concluded to go myself with the rest of my force to Gnadenhutten, where a fort was thought more immediately necessary. The Moravians procured me five wagons for our tools, stores, baggage, &c. Just before we left Bethlehem, eleven farmers, who had been driven from their plantations by the Indians, came to me requesting a supply of firearms, that they might go back and bring off their cattle. I gave them each a gun with suitable ammunition. We had not marched many miles before it began to rain, and it continued raining all day; there were no habitations on the road to shelter us till we arrived near night at the house of a German, where, and in his barn, we were all huddled together as wet as water could make us. It was well we were not attacked in our march, for our arms were of the most ordinary sort, and our men could not keep the locks of their guns dry. The Indians are dexterous in contrivances for that purpose, which we had not. They met[Pg 168] that day the eleven poor farmers above mentioned, and killed ten of them; the one that escaped informed us that his and his companions' guns would not go off, the priming being wet with the rain. The next day, being fair, we continued our march, and arrived at the desolate Gnadenhutten; there was a mill near, round which were left several pine boards, with which we soon hutted ourselves; an operation the more necessary at that inclement season, as we had no tents. Our first work was to bury more effectually the dead we found there, who had been half interred by the country people; the next morning our fort was planned and marked out, the circumference measuring four hundred and fifty-five feet, which would require as many palisades to be made, one with another, of a foot diameter each. Our axes, of which we had seventy, were immediately set to work to cut down trees; and our men being dexterous in the use of them, great despatch was made. Seeing the trees fall so fast, I had the curiosity to look at my watch when two men began to cut a pine; in six minutes they had it upon the ground, and I found it of fourteen inches diameter: each pine made three palisades of eighteen feet long, pointed at one end. While these were preparing our other men dug a trench all round of three feet deep, in which the palisades were to be planted; and the bodies being taken off our wagons, and the fore and hind wheels separated by taking out the pin which united the two parts of the perch, we had ten carriages, with two horses each, to bring the palisades from the woods to the spot. When they were set up, our carpenters built a platform of boards all round within, about six feet high, for the men to stand on when to fire through the loopholes. We had one swivel gun, which we mounted on one of the angles, and fired it as soon as fixed, to let the Indians know, if any were within hearing, that we had such pieces; and thus our fort[Pg 169] (if that name may be given to so miserable a stockade) was finished in a week, though it rained so hard every other day that the men could not well work.

It was early January when we started the project of building forts. I sent one group to the Minisink with orders to set up a fort for the safety of that part of the area, and another group to the lower part with similar instructions. I decided to go myself with the rest of my troops to Gnadenhutten, where a fort was considered more urgently needed. The Moravians provided me with five wagons for our tools, supplies, baggage, etc. Just before we left Bethlehem, eleven farmers, displaced from their farms by the Indians, came to me asking for firearms so they could go back and retrieve their cattle. I gave each of them a gun along with appropriate ammunition. We hadn’t marched far when it started to rain, and it rained all day; there were no shelters along the way until we reached a German's house late in the evening, where we all crammed together as wet as could be in the barn. It was fortunate we weren’t attacked during our march, as our weapons were quite basic, and our men struggled to keep their guns dry. The Indians were skilled at such things, unlike us. That day, the eleven farmers I mentioned encountered the enemy, and ten of them were killed. The one who survived told us that his and his friends’ guns wouldn’t fire because the priming was soaked from the rain. The next day, with the weather clear, we continued our march and arrived at the abandoned Gnadenhutten. There was a mill nearby, and we quickly gathered several pine boards to build ourselves some shelter, which was essential in that harsh season since we had no tents. Our first task was to properly bury the dead we found there, who had been half buried by local people. The next morning, we planned and marked out the layout for our fort, which had a perimeter of four hundred and fifty-five feet; we would need that many palisades, each about a foot in diameter. We immediately put our seventy axes to work cutting down trees, and our men were skilled in their use, making good progress. Seeing how fast the trees were falling, I checked my watch when two men started cutting a pine; within six minutes, they had it on the ground, measuring fourteen inches in diameter. Each fallen pine produced three palisades each eighteen feet long, pointed at one end. While these were being prepared, our other men dug a three-foot-deep trench all around where the palisades would be planted. After removing the cargo from our wagons and disconnecting the front and back wheels by taking out the pin that held the two parts together, we had ten wagons, each pulled by two horses, to transport the palisades from the woods to the construction site. Once they were set up, our carpenters built a platform of boards around the inside, about six feet high, for the men to stand on when firing through the loopholes. We mounted a swivel gun on one of the corners and fired it as soon as it was fixed to let any Indians nearby know that we had such artillery. Thus, our fort (if you can call it that, considering how crude it was) was completed in a week, even though it rained heavily every other day, making it hard for the men to work.

This gave me occasion to observe, that when men are employed they are best contented, for on the days they worked they were good-natured and cheerful, and with the consciousness of having done a good day's work they spent the evening jollily; but on our idle days they were mutinous and quarrelsome, finding fault with the pork, the bread, &c., and we were continually in bad humour, which put me in mind of a sea-captain, whose rule it was to keep his men constantly at work; and when his mate once told him that they had done everything, and there was nothing farther to employ them about, "Oh," said he, "make them scour the anchor."

This gave me a chance to notice that when people are working, they are much happier. On the days they worked, they were friendly and upbeat, and feeling accomplished after a good day’s work, they spent the evening enjoying themselves. However, on our days off, they became rebellious and argumentative, complaining about the pork, the bread, etc., and we were constantly in a bad mood. This reminded me of a sea captain whose rule was to keep his crew busy all the time. One time, when his first mate told him they had finished everything and had nothing left to do, he said, "Oh, make them scrub the anchor."

This kind of fort, however contemptible, is a sufficient defence against Indians who had no cannon. Finding ourselves now posted securely, and having a place to retreat to on occasion, we ventured out in parties to scour the adjacent country. We met with no Indians, but we found the places on the neighbouring hills where they had lain to watch our proceedings. There was an art in their contrivance of those places that seems worth mentioning. It being winter, a fire was necessary for them; but a common fire on the surface of the ground would, by its light, have discovered their position at a distance; they had therefore dug holes in the ground, about three feet in diameter and somewhat deeper; we found where they had, with their hatchets, cut off the charcoal from the sides of burnt logs lying in the woods. With these coals they had made small fires in the bottom of the holes, and we observed among the weeds and grass the prints of their bodies, made by their lying all round with their legs hanging down in the holes to keep their feet warm, which with them is an essential point.[Pg 170] This kind of fire, so managed, could not discover them either by its light, flame, sparks, or even smoke; it appeared that the number was not great, and it seems they saw we were too many to be attacked by them with prospect of advantage.

This kind of fort, though not impressive, was enough protection against Indians who didn’t have cannons. Now that we were secure in our location and had a place to retreat to if needed, we started going out in groups to explore the surrounding area. We didn’t run into any Indians, but we did find spots on the nearby hills where they had been hiding to observe us. There was a cleverness in how they set up those spots that’s worth mentioning. Since it was winter, they needed a fire, but a regular fire on the ground would have revealed their position from a distance. So, they dug holes about three feet wide and a bit deeper. We found where they had used their hatchets to chip off charcoal from the sides of burned logs lying in the woods. With these coals, they started small fires at the bottom of the holes, and we noticed prints in the weeds and grass where they had lain around, with their legs dangling down in the holes to keep their feet warm, which is important for them. This type of fire was managed in such a way that it didn’t give away their presence through light, flame, sparks, or even smoke. It seemed like there weren’t many of them, and they likely realized that they were outnumbered and wouldn’t have a good chance of winning if they attacked us.[Pg 170]

I had hardly got my fort well stored with provisions when I received a letter from the governor acquainting me that he had called the Assembly, and wished my attendance there, if the posture of affairs on the frontiers was such that my remaining there was no longer necessary. My friends, too, of the Assembly, pressing me by their letters to be, if possible, at the meeting; and my three intended forts being now completed, and the inhabitants contented to remain on their farms under that protection, I resolved to return, the more willingly, as a New-England officer, Colonel Clapham, experienced in Indian war, being on a visit to our establishment, consented to accept the command. I gave him a commission, and, parading the garrison, had it read before them, and introduced him to them as an officer who, from his skill in military affairs, was much more fit to command them than myself, and, giving them a little exhortation, took my leave. I was escorted as far as Bethlehem, where I rested a few days to recover from the fatigue I had undergone. The first night, lying in a good bed, I could hardly sleep, it was so different from my hard lodging on the floor of a hut at Gnadenhutten, with only a blanket or two. While at Bethlehem I inquired a little into the practices of the Moravians; some of them had accompanied me, and all were very kind to me. I found they worked for a common stock, ate at common tables, and slept in common dormitories, great numbers together. In the dormitories I observed loopholes at certain distances all along just under the ceiling, which I thought judiciously placed for change of air. I went to their church, where I was entertained with good music,[Pg 171] the organ being accompanied with violins, haut-boys, flutes, clarinets, &c. I understood their sermons were not usually preached to mixed congregations of men, women, and children, as is our common practice, but that they assembled sometimes the married men, at other times their wives, then the young men, the young women, and the little children, each division by itself. The sermon I heard was to the latter, who came in and were placed in rows on benches, the boys under the conduct of a young man, their tutor, and the girls conducted by a young woman. The discourse seemed well adapted to their capacities, and was delivered in a pleasing, familiar manner, coaxing them, as it were, to be good. They behaved very orderly, but looked pale and unhealthy, which made me suspect they were kept too much within doors, or not allowed sufficient exercise. I inquired concerning the Moravian marriages, whether the report was true that they were by lot; I was told that lots were used only in particular cases: that generally, when a young man found himself disposed to marry, he informed the elders of his class, who consulted the elder ladies that governed the young women. As these elders of the different sexes were well acquainted with the tempers and dispositions of their respective pupils, they could best judge what matches were suitable, and their judgments were generally acquiesced in. But if, for example, it should happen that two or three young women were found to be equally proper for the young man, the lot was then recurred to. I objected, if the matches are not made by the mutual choice of the parties, some of them may chance to be very unhappy. "And so they may," answered my informer, "if you let the parties choose for themselves:" which, indeed, I could not deny.

I had just finished stocking my fort with supplies when I got a letter from the governor telling me he had called the Assembly and wanted me to attend if the situation on the frontiers wasn’t urgent enough for me to stay. My friends in the Assembly were also urging me through their letters to be at the meeting if possible. Since my three planned forts were now complete and the residents were happy to stay on their farms under that protection, I decided to return. I was even more willing to leave because a New England officer, Colonel Clapham, who had experience in Indian warfare, was visiting our post and agreed to take command. I gave him a commission, and, after assembling the garrison, I had it read to them and introduced him as someone much more qualified to lead them than I was, thanks to his military expertise. After a brief encouragement to the soldiers, I took my leave. I was escorted as far as Bethlehem, where I rested for a few days to recover from my exhaustion. That first night, lying in a comfortable bed, I could barely sleep; it was so different from my hard nights on the floor of a hut in Gnadenhutten, with just a blanket or two. While in Bethlehem, I looked into the practices of the Moravians. Some of them had accompanied me, and they were all very kind. I learned that they worked for a common fund, ate at communal tables, and slept in shared dormitories with many people together. In the dormitories, I noticed loopholes at regular intervals just below the ceiling, which I thought were cleverly placed for ventilation. I attended their church, where I enjoyed good music, with the organ accompanied by violins, oboes, flutes, clarinets, etc. I found out that their sermons usually weren't given to mixed groups of men, women, and children like we typically do; instead, they would sometimes have the married men together, then their wives, and later the young men, young women, and children, each group separately. The sermon I attended was for the children, who entered and were seated in rows on benches, with the boys led by a young man and the girls by a young woman. The message seemed well-suited for their understanding and was delivered in a warm, friendly manner, encouraging them to be good. They behaved well, but they looked pale and unhealthy, which made me wonder if they were kept indoors too much or didn’t get enough exercise. I asked about Moravian marriages, curious if the rumor was true that they happened by lot. I was told that lots were used only in specific cases: usually, when a young man wanted to marry, he would inform the elders of his group, who then consulted the elder ladies governing the young women. Since these elders knew the personalities and traits of their respective groups well, they could best judge which matches were appropriate, and their decisions were generally accepted. However, if there were two or three suitable young women for the man, they would then turn to the lot. I expressed concern that if matches weren’t made by mutual choice, some may end up very unhappy. "And they might," my informant replied, "if you let the parties choose for themselves," which I couldn’t deny.

Being returned to Philadelphia, I found the association went on with great success, the inhabitants[Pg 172] that were not Quakers having pretty generally come into it, formed themselves into companies, and chose their captains, lieutenants, and ensigns, according to the new law. Dr. Bond visited me, and gave me an account of the pains he had taken to spread a general good-liking to the law, and ascribed much to those endeavours. I had the vanity to ascribe all to my dialogue; however, not knowing but that he might be in the right, I let him enjoy his opinion, which I take to be generally the best way in such cases. The officers meeting, chose me to be colonel of the regiment, which I this time accepted. I forget how many companies we had, but we paraded about twelve hundred well-looking men, with a company of artillery, who had been furnished with six brass field-pieces, which they had become so expert in the use of as to fire twelve times in a minute. The first time I reviewed my regiment, they accompanied me to my house, and would salute me with some rounds fired before my door, which shook down and broke several glasses of my electrical apparatus. And my new honour proved not much less brittle; for all our commissions were soon after broken by a repeal of the law in England.

After returning to Philadelphia, I found the association was thriving, with most of the locals who weren't Quakers joining in. They organized themselves into groups and elected their captains, lieutenants, and ensigns according to the new law. Dr. Bond visited me and shared how he had worked hard to build support for the law, claiming he contributed significantly to that effort. I had the pride to think it was all due to my discussion; however, since he might have had a point, I let him keep his belief, which I think is usually the best approach in such situations. The officers gathered and elected me as colonel of the regiment, a position I accepted this time. I can’t recall the exact number of companies we had, but we paraded about twelve hundred well-dressed men, along with an artillery unit that had been equipped with six brass field pieces, which they had become skilled enough to fire twelve times a minute. During my first review of the regiment, they followed me to my house and honored me with several rounds fired in front of my door, which shook and broke several pieces of my electrical equipment. My new honor turned out to be just as fragile; shortly after, all our commissions were invalidated by a repeal of the law in England.

During this short time of my colonelship, being about to set out on a journey to Virginia, the officers of my regiment took it into their heads that it would be proper for them to escort me out of town as far as the lower ferry; just as I was getting on horseback they came to my door, between thirty and forty, mounted, and all in their uniforms. I had not been previously acquainted with their project, or I should have prevented it, being naturally averse to the assuming of state on any occasion; and I was a good deal chagrined at their appearance, as I could not avoid their accompanying me. What made it worse was, that, as soon as we began to move, they drew their swords and rode with[Pg 173] them naked all the way. Somebody wrote an account of this to the proprietor, and it gave him great offence. No such honour had been paid him when in the province, nor to any of his governors; and he said it was only proper to princes of the blood royal, which may be true for aught I know, who was and still am ignorant of the etiquette in such cases. This silly affair, however, greatly increased his rancour against me, which was before considerable, on account of my conduct in the Assembly respecting the exemption of his estate from taxation, which I had always opposed very warmly, and not without severe reflections on the meanness and injustice in contending for it. He accused me to the ministry as being the great obstacle to the king's service, preventing, by my influence in the house, the proper form of the bills for raising money; and he instanced the parade with my officers as a proof of my having an intention to take the government of the province out of his hands by force. He also applied to Sir Everard Faukener, the postmaster-general, to deprive me of my office; but it had no other effect than to procure from Sir Everard a gentle admonition.

During my short time as a colonel, as I was preparing to leave for a trip to Virginia, the officers in my regiment thought it would be appropriate to escort me out of town as far as the lower ferry. Just as I was about to mount my horse, they arrived at my door, about thirty to forty of them, all in their uniforms. I hadn't known about their plan beforehand, or I would have stopped it because I naturally dislike any display of authority. I was quite embarrassed by their appearance, as I couldn't avoid them joining me. To make matters worse, as soon as we started moving, they drew their swords and rode alongside me with them unsheathed the entire way. Someone told the proprietor about this, and it really upset him. No one had ever given him such an honor when he was in the province, nor to any of his governors; he claimed it was only appropriate for members of the royal family, which I have no clue about because I'm still ignorant of the etiquette in these situations. This foolish incident, however, only fueled his anger towards me, which was already significant due to my actions in the Assembly regarding his estate's tax exemption, something I had always opposed fiercely, criticizing the meanness and injustice of arguing for it. He accused me to the ministry of being a major obstacle to the king's service, saying that I was using my influence in the house to block proper bills for raising revenue; he even pointed to the parade with my officers as evidence of my intention to forcibly take control of the province from him. He also went to Sir Everard Faukener, the postmaster-general, to try to get me removed from my position; however, the only result was a mild admonition from Sir Everard.

Notwithstanding the continual wrangle between the governor and the house, in which I, as a member, had so large a share, there still subsisted a civil intercourse between that gentleman and myself, and we never had any personal difference. I have sometimes since thought, that his little or no resentment against me, for the answers it was known I drew up to his messages, might be the effect of professional habit, and that, being bred a lawyer, he might consider us both as merely advocates for contending clients in a suit; he for the proprietaries, and I for the Assembly: he would, therefore, sometimes call in a friendly way to advise with me on difficult points; and sometimes, though not often, take my advice. We acted in concert to supply[Pg 174] Braddock's army with provisions; and when the shocking news arrived of his defeat, the governor sent in haste for me, to consult with him on measures for preventing the desertion of the back counties. I forget now the advice I gave, but I think it was that Dunbar should be written to, and prevailed with, if possible, to post his troops on the frontiers for their protection, until, by re-enforcements from the colonies, he might be able to proceed in the expedition: and, after my return from the frontier, he would have had me undertake the conduct of such an expedition with provincial troops, for the reduction of Fort Duquesne (Dunbar and his men being otherwise employed); and he proposed to commission me as a general. I had not so good an opinion of my military abilities as he professed to have, and I believe his professions must have exceeded his real sentiments: but probably he might think that my popularity would facilitate the business with the men, and influence in the Assembly the grant of money to pay for it; and that, perhaps, without taxing the proprietary. Finding me not so forward to engage as he expected, the project was dropped; and he soon after left the government, being superseded by Captain Denny.

Despite the ongoing disputes between the governor and the house, which I, as a member, was heavily involved in, there was still a respectful relationship between him and me, and we never had any personal conflicts. I've sometimes thought that his lack of resentment towards me for the responses I prepared to his messages might be due to his professional background as a lawyer; he likely viewed us as advocates for opposing sides in a case—him for the proprietors and me for the Assembly. Sometimes, he would reach out in a friendly manner to consult with me on tough issues, and occasionally, though not very often, he would take my advice. We worked together to provide provisions for Braddock's army, and when the devastating news of his defeat came, the governor rushed to ask for my help in figuring out how to stop the back counties from abandoning their posts. I can't quite recall the advice I gave, but I think I suggested that Dunbar should be contacted and encouraged, if possible, to station his troops on the frontiers for protection until reinforcements from the colonies could allow him to continue the mission. After I came back from the frontier, he wanted me to lead an expedition with provincial troops to take Fort Duquesne (since Dunbar and his men were occupied elsewhere), and he proposed to appoint me as a general. I didn't think my military skills were as good as he claimed, and I suspect his praise exceeded his true feelings. However, he might have believed that my popularity would help rally the men and influence the Assembly to provide funding without taxing the proprietors. When he realized I wasn't as eager to take part as he had hoped, the plan was set aside, and shortly after, he left the government, replaced by Captain Denny.

Before I proceed in relating the part I had in public affairs under this new governor's administration, it may not be amiss to give here some account of the rise and progress of my philosophical reputation.

Before I share my role in public affairs during this new governor's administration, it might be helpful to provide some background on how my philosophical reputation developed over time.

In 1746, being at Boston, I met there with a Dr. Spence, who was lately arrived from Scotland, and showed me some electric experiments. They were imperfectly performed, as he was not very expert; but, being on a subject quite new to me, they equally surprised and pleased me. Soon after my return to Philadelphia, our library company received from Mr. Peter Collinson, F.R.S., of London, a present of a glass tube, with some account of the use of it[Pg 175] in making such experiments. I eagerly seized the opportunity of repeating what I had seen at Boston; and, by much practice, acquired great readiness in performing those also which we had an account of from England, adding a number of new ones. I say much practice, for my house was constantly full for some time with persons who came to see these new wonders. To divide a little this encumbrance among my friends, I caused a number of similar tubes to be blown in our glasshouse, with which they furnished themselves, so that we had at length several performers. Among these the principal was Mr. Kinnersly, an ingenious neighbour, who, being out of business, I encouraged to undertake showing the experiments for money, and drew up for him two lectures, in which the experiments were ranged in such order, and accompanied with explanations in such method, as that the foregoing should assist in comprehending the following. He procured an elegant apparatus for the purpose, in which all the little machines that I had roughly made for myself were neatly formed by instrument-makers. His lectures were well-attended and gave great satisfaction; and, after some time, he went through the colonies, exhibiting them in every capital town, and picked up some money. In the West India islands, indeed, it was with difficulty the experiments could be made, from the general moisture of the air.

In 1746, while I was in Boston, I met Dr. Spence, who had just arrived from Scotland and showed me some electric experiments. They weren’t perfectly done since he wasn’t very skilled, but since the topic was completely new to me, I found them both surprising and enjoyable. Shortly after returning to Philadelphia, our library company received a glass tube as a gift from Mr. Peter Collinson, F.R.S., from London, along with some information on how to use it[Pg 175] for such experiments. I quickly seized the chance to replicate what I’d seen in Boston, and with lots of practice, I became quite proficient at performing those experiments we had received from England, plus I developed several new ones. I mention a lot of practice because my house was constantly filled for a while with people wanting to see these new wonders. To ease the burden a bit, I had several similar tubes made in our glasshouse, so my friends could get their own and we ended up with several people doing the demonstrations. The main one among them was Mr. Kinnersly, a clever neighbor. Since he was out of work, I encouraged him to start giving paid demonstrations of the experiments and prepared two lectures for him, organizing the experiments so that earlier ones would help in understanding the later ones. He acquired a nice setup for this purpose, where all the little machines I had roughly constructed for myself were neatly made by instrument-makers. His lectures were well-attended and very satisfying; eventually, he traveled through the colonies, showcasing them in every major town and made some money. In the West Indies, however, it was challenging to conduct the experiments due to the generally humid air.

Obliged as we were to Mr. Collinson for the present of the tube, &c., I thought it right he should be informed of our success in using it, and wrote him several letters containing accounts of our experiments. He got them read in the Royal Society, where they were not at first thought worth so much notice as to be printed in their transactions. One paper which I wrote for Mr. Kinnersly, on the sameness of lightning with electricity, I sent to Mr. Mitchel, an acquaintance of mine, and one of the members also of that society; who wrote me word[Pg 176] that it had been read, but was laughed at by the connoisseurs. The papers, however, being shown to Dr. Fothergill, he thought them of too much value to be stifled, and advised the printing of them. Mr. Collinson then gave them to Cave for publication in his Gentleman's Magazine; but he chose to print them separately in a pamphlet, and Dr. Fothergill wrote the preface. Cave, it seems, judged rightly for his profession; for, by the additions that arrived afterward, they swelled to a quarto volume; which has had five editions, and cost him nothing for copy-money.

Obliged as we were to Mr. Collinson for the gift of the tube, etc., I thought it was important to inform him about our success in using it, so I wrote several letters detailing our experiments. He had them read at the Royal Society, where they didn’t initially get enough attention to be published in their transactions. One paper I wrote for Mr. Kinnersly about the similarity between lightning and electricity, I sent to Mr. Mitchel, a friend of mine and a member of that society; he wrote back that it had been read but laughed at by the experts. However, when Dr. Fothergill saw the papers, he believed they were too valuable to be ignored and recommended that they be published. Mr. Collinson then gave them to Cave for publication in his Gentleman's Magazine; however, he decided to print them separately as a pamphlet, and Dr. Fothergill wrote the preface. Cave seemed to have made a wise choice for his profession; because, with the additions that came later, they grew into a quarto volume, which has seen five editions and cost him nothing for copy expenses.

It was, however, some time before those papers were much taken notice of in England. A copy of them happening to fall into the hands of the Count de Buffon (a philosopher deservedly of great reputation in France, and, indeed, all over Europe), he prevailed with Monsieur Dubourg to translate them into French; and they were printed at Paris. The publication offended the Abbé Nollet, preceptor in Natural Philosophy to the royal family, and an able experimenter, who had formed and published a theory of electricity, which then had the general vogue. He could not at first believe that such a work came from America, and said it must have been fabricated by his enemies at Paris, to oppose his system. Afterward, having been assured that there really existed such a person as Franklin at Philadelphia (which he had doubted), he wrote and published a volume of letters, chiefly addressed to me, defending his theory, and denying the verity of my experiments, and of the positions deduced from them. I once purposed answering the abbé, and actually began the answer; but, on consideration that my writings contained a description of experiments which any one might repeat and verify, and, if not to be verified, could not be defended; or of observations offered as conjectures, and not delivered dogmatically, therefore not laying me under any[Pg 177] obligation to defend them; and reflecting that a dispute between two persons, written in different languages, might be lengthened greatly by mistranslations, and thence misconceptions of another's meaning, much of one of the abbé's letters being founded on an error in the translation, I concluded to let my papers shift for themselves, believing it was better to spend what time I could spare from public business in making new experiments than in disputing about those already made. I therefore never answered Monsieur Nollet, and the event gave me no cause to repent my silence; for my friend, Monsieur Le Roy, of the Royal Academy of Sciences, took up my cause and refuted him: my book was translated into the Italian, German, and Latin languages; and the doctrine it contained was, by degrees, generally adopted by the philosophers of Europe, in preference to that of the abbé; so that he lived to see himself the last of his sect, except Monsieur B——, of Paris, his eléve and immediate disciple.

However, it took a while before those papers were really noticed in England. A copy ended up in the hands of Count de Buffon, a well-respected philosopher in France and across Europe, who convinced Monsieur Dubourg to translate them into French, and they were printed in Paris. The publication upset Abbé Nollet, the royal family's Natural Philosophy tutor and a skilled experimenter, who had developed and published a popular theory of electricity. He couldn’t initially believe that a work could come from America and claimed it must have been created by his enemies in Paris to challenge his system. Later, after being assured that Franklin really existed in Philadelphia (which he had doubted), he wrote and published a volume of letters mainly addressed to me, defending his theory and denying the validity of my experiments and the conclusions drawn from them. I once planned to respond to the abbé and even started drafting an answer, but then I realized that my writings included descriptions of experiments that anyone could repeat and verify, and if they couldn’t be verified, they couldn’t be defended; or they offered observations as conjectures, not stated dogmatically, so I wasn't obligated to defend them. Additionally, I considered that a dispute between two people writing in different languages could drag on due to mistranslations and misunderstandings, especially since much of one of the abbé’s letters was based on a translation error. I decided to let my papers stand on their own, thinking it better to spend my available time on public business conducting new experiments rather than arguing about those already done. Therefore, I never replied to Monsieur Nollet, and I had no reason to regret my silence; my friend, Monsieur Le Roy from the Royal Academy of Sciences, took up my defense and refuted him. My book was translated into Italian, German, and Latin, and its doctrines were gradually adopted by European philosophers over Abbé Nollet’s, leading him to be left as the last of his group, apart from Monsieur B—— of Paris, his élève and closest disciple.

What gave my book the more sudden and general celebrity, was the success of one of its proposed experiments, made by Messieurs Dalibard and Delor, at Marly, for drawing lightning from the clouds. This engaged the public attention everywhere. Monsieur Delor, who had an apparatus for experimental philosophy, and lectured in that branch of science, undertook to repeat what he called the Philadelphia experiments; and after they were performed before the king and court, all the curious of Paris flocked to see them. I will not swell this narrative with an account of that capital experiment, nor of the infinite pleasure I received in the success of a similar one I made soon after with a kite at Philadelphia, as both are to be found in the histories of electricity. Dr. Wright, an English physician, when at Paris, wrote to a friend, who was of the Royal Society, an account of the high esteem[Pg 178] my experiments were in among the learned abroad, and of their wonder that my writings had been so little noticed in England. The society, on this, resumed the consideration of the letters that had been read to them, and the celebrated Dr. Watson drew up a summary account of them, and of all I had afterward sent to England on the subject, which he accompanied with some praise of the writer. This summary was then printed in their transactions: and some members of the society in London, particularly the very ingenious Mr. Canton, having verified the experiment of procuring lightning from the clouds by a pointed rod, and acquainted them with the success, they soon made me more than amends for the slight with which they had before treated me. Without my having made any application for that honour, they chose me a member; and voted that I should be excused the customary payments, which would have amounted to twenty-five guineas; and ever since have given me their transactions gratis.[12] They also presented me with[Pg 179] the gold medal of Sir Godfrey Copley, for the year 1753, the delivery of which was accompanied by a very handsome speech of the president, Lord Macclesfield, wherein I was highly honoured.

What made my book suddenly and widely popular was the success of one of its proposed experiments, conducted by Messieurs Dalibard and Delor at Marly, where they drew lightning from the clouds. This captured the public's attention everywhere. Monsieur Delor, who had equipment for experimental philosophy and lectured on that subject, set out to repeat what he called the Philadelphia experiments; and after they were demonstrated before the king and court, all the curious people of Paris flocked to watch. I won’t lengthen this narrative with details about that important experiment, nor about the immense joy I felt from a similar one I conducted soon after with a kite in Philadelphia, as both are documented in the histories of electricity. Dr. Wright, an English physician, while in Paris, wrote to a friend in the Royal Society, describing the high regard my experiments had among the scholars abroad and their surprise that my writings had received so little attention in England. This prompted the society to revisit the letters that had been presented to them, and the notable Dr. Watson compiled a summary of them and everything I later sent to England on the topic, along with some praise for me as the writer. This summary was then printed in their transactions. Additionally, some members of the society in London, particularly the very clever Mr. Canton, having confirmed the experiment of obtaining lightning from the clouds using a pointed rod and informing them of its success, soon made up for the earlier slight against me. Without me even applying for that honor, they elected me as a member and decided that I should be exempt from the usual fees, which would have totaled twenty-five guineas; and since then, they have provided me with their transactions for free.[12] They also awarded me the gold medal of Sir Godfrey Copley for the year 1753, accompanied by a very gracious speech from the president, Lord Macclesfield, in which I was highly praised.

Our new governor, Captain Denny, brought over for me the before-mentioned medal from the Royal Society, which he presented to me at an entertainment given him by the city. He accompanied it with very polite expressions of his esteem for me, having, as he said, been long acquainted with my character. After dinner, when the company, as was customary at that time, were engaged in drinking, he took me aside into another room, and acquainted me that he had been advised by his friends in England to cultivate a friendship with me, as one who was capable of giving him the best advice, and of contributing most effectually to render his administration easy. That he therefore desired of all things to have a good understanding with me, and he begged me to be assured of his readiness on all occasions to render me any service that might be in his power. He said much to me also of the proprietors' good disposition towards the province, and of the advantage it would be to us all, and to me in particular, if the opposition that had been so long[Pg 180] continued to his measures was dropped, and harmony restored between him and the people, in effecting which it was thought no one could be more serviceable than myself; and I might depend on adequate acknowledgments and recompenses, &c. The drinkers, finding we did not return immediately to the table, sent us a decanter of Madeira, which the governor made liberal use of, and, in proportion, became more profuse of his solicitations and promises. My answers were to this purpose; that my circumstances, thanks to God, were such as to make proprietary favours unnecessary to me; and that, being a member of the Assembly, I could not possibly accept of any; that, however, I had no personal enmity to the proprietary, and that, whenever the public measures he proposed should appear to be for the good of the people, no one would espouse and forward them more zealously than myself; my past opposition had been founded on this, that the measures which had been urged were evidently intended to serve the proprietary interest with great prejudice to that of the people. That I was much obliged to him (the governor) for his profession of regard to me, and that he might rely on everything in my power to render his administration as easy as possible, hoping, at the same time, that he had not brought the same unfortunate instructions his predecessors had been hampered with. On this he did not then explain himself; but when he afterward came to do business with the Assembly, they appeared again; the disputes were renewed, and I was as active as ever in the opposition, being the penman, first of the request to have a communication of the instructions, and then of the remarks upon them, which may be found in the Votes of the Times, and in the Historical Review I afterward published: but between us personally no enmity arose; we were often together; he was a man of letters, and had seen much of the world, and was[Pg 181] entertaining and pleasing in conversation. He gave me information that my old friend Ralph was still alive, that he was esteemed one of the best political writers in England; had been employed in the dispute between Prince Frederic and the king, and had obtained a pension of three hundred pounds a year; that his reputation was indeed small as a poet, but his prose was thought as good as any man's.

Our new governor, Captain Denny, brought me the previously mentioned medal from the Royal Society, which he presented to me at a city-hosted event. He accompanied it with very polite expressions of his regard for me, saying he had been familiar with my character for a long time. After dinner, when everyone was drinking, he took me aside to a different room and told me that his friends in England had advised him to build a friendship with me, as I could provide him with the best advice and greatly help make his administration easier. He emphasized that he wanted to have a good understanding with me and assured me that he was ready to offer any assistance he could. He also talked about the proprietors' good intentions toward the province and the advantages it would bring to all of us, especially to me, if the long-standing opposition to his ideas ceased and harmony was restored between him and the people. He believed that I could be very helpful in achieving this and promised appropriate acknowledgments and rewards. When the drinkers noticed we hadn't returned to the table right away, they sent us a decanter of Madeira, which the governor used generously, and consequently, he became even more effusive with his requests and promises. I responded that, thank God, my situation made proprietary favors unnecessary for me and that, as a member of the Assembly, I couldn't possibly accept any. However, I had no personal grudge against the proprietors, and whenever any public proposals he recommended seemed beneficial for the people, no one would support them more passionately than I would. My past opposition was based on the fact that the measures put forward were clearly meant to serve proprietary interests at the expense of the people's welfare. I expressed my gratitude to him for his kind words and assured him that he could count on my support to make his administration as smooth as possible, hoping that he hadn't brought the same unfortunate instructions that troubled his predecessors. He didn't clarify that at the time, but when he later came to work with the Assembly, those issues resurfaced. The disputes reignited, and I remained as active as ever in opposition, drafting the request to disclose the instructions and then the comments on them, which can be found in the Votes of the Times and in the History Review I published later. Despite this, we had no personal animosity; we often spent time together. He was well-read, had traveled widely, and was engaging and enjoyable to talk to. He informed me that my old friend Ralph was still alive, recognized as one of the best political writers in England. He had been involved in the dispute between Prince Frederic and the king and had secured a pension of three hundred pounds a year. Though his reputation as a poet was minor, his prose was considered among the best.

The Assembly finally finding the proprietary obstinately persisted in shackling the deputies with instructions, inconsistent not only with the privileges of the people, but with the service of the crown, resolved to petition the king against them, and appointed me their agent to go over to England to present and support the petition. The house had sent up a bill to the governor, granting a sum of sixty thousand pounds for the king's use (ten thousand pounds of which was subjected to the orders of the then general, Lord Loudon), which the governor, in compliance with his instructions, absolutely refused to pass. I had agreed with Captain Morris, of the packet at New-York, for my passage, and my stores were put on board; when Lord Loudon arrived at Philadelphia, expressly, as he told me, to endeavour an accommodation between the governor and Assembly, that his majesty's service might not be obstructed by their dissensions. Accordingly, he desired the governor and myself to meet him, that he might hear what was to be said on both sides. We met and discussed the business: in behalf of the Assembly, I urged the various arguments that may be found in the public papers of that time, which were of my writing, and are printed with the minutes of the Assembly; and the governor pleaded his instructions, the bond he had given to observe them, and his ruin if he disobeyed; yet seemed not unwilling to hazard himself if Lord Loudon would advise it. This his lordship did not choose to do, though I once thought I had nearly prevailed with[Pg 182] him to do it; but finally he rather chose to urge the compliance of the Assembly; and he entreated me to use my endeavours with them for that purpose, declaring that he would spare none of the king's troops for the defence of our frontiers, and that, if we did not continue to provide for that defence ourselves, they must remain exposed to the enemy. I acquainted the house with what had passed, and presenting them with a set of resolutions I had drawn up, declaring our rights, that we did not relinquish our claim to those rights, but only suspended the exercise of them on this occasion, through force, against which we protested, they at length agreed to drop the bill, and frame another conformably to the proprietary instructions; this, of course, the governor passed, and I was then at liberty to proceed on my voyage. But, in the mean time, the packet had sailed with my sea stores, which was some loss to me, and my only recompense was his lordship's thanks for my service, all the credit of obtaining the accommodation falling to his share.

The Assembly finally found the proprietary stubbornly continued to restrict the deputies with instructions that were not only inconsistent with the people's privileges but also with the crown's service. They decided to petition the king about this and appointed me as their representative to go to England to present and advocate for the petition. The House had sent a bill to the governor, proposing a sum of sixty thousand pounds for the king's use (with ten thousand pounds allocated to the orders of the current general, Lord Loudon), which the governor, following his instructions, outright refused to pass. I had arranged with Captain Morris, who was on the packet in New York, for my passage, and my supplies were loaded on board when Lord Loudon arrived in Philadelphia. He told me he came specifically to help resolve the issues between the governor and the Assembly so that the king's service wouldn’t be hindered by their disputes. Accordingly, he requested that the governor and I meet with him so he could hear both sides. We met and discussed the matter: on behalf of the Assembly, I presented various arguments found in the public papers of that time, which I had written, and are included with the Assembly's minutes; the governor defended his actions with his instructions, emphasizing his obligation to follow them and the risks he faced if he didn't, but he also didn’t seem entirely opposed to risking it if Lord Loudon would recommend it. Yet, his lordship chose not to do that, even though I once thought I was close to convincing him; in the end, he preferred to push for the Assembly's compliance and asked me to persuade them, stating he wouldn’t spare any of the king's troops for the defense of our frontiers, and that if we didn't continue to arrange for that defense ourselves, they would be left vulnerable to the enemy. I informed the House of what had transpired and presented them with a set of resolutions I had drafted, asserting our rights and stating that while we were not giving up our claim to those rights, we were just suspending their exercise at this time due to force, against which we protested. Eventually, they agreed to drop the bill and create another one in line with the proprietary instructions; thus, the governor passed it, and I was then free to continue my journey. However, in the meantime, the packet had already sailed with my supplies, which was a setback for me, and all I received in return was the lordship's thanks for my service, while he got all the credit for achieving the accommodation.

He set out for New-York before me; and as the time for despatching the packet-boats was in his disposition, and there were two then remaining there, one of which, he said, was to sail very soon, I requested to know the precise time, that I might not miss her by any delay of mine. The answer was, "I have given out that she is to sail on Saturday next; but I may let you know, entre nous, that if you are there by Monday morning, you will be in time, but do not delay longer!" By some accidental hinderance at a ferry, it was Monday noon before I arrived, and I was much afraid she might have sailed, as the wind was fair; but I was soon made easy by the information that she was still in the harbour, and would not move till next day. One would imagine that I was now on the very point of departing for Europe; I thought so, but I was not then so well acquainted with his lordship's character,[Pg 183] of which indecision was one of the strongest features: I shall give some instances. It was about the beginning of April that I came to New-York, and I think it was near the end of June before we sailed. There were then two of the packet-boats which had been long in readiness, but were detained for the general's letters, which were always to be ready to-morrow. Another packet arrived; she too was detained, and before we sailed a fourth was expected. Ours was the first to be despatched, as having been there longest. Passengers were engaged for all, and some extremely impatient to be gone, and the merchants uneasy about their letters, and for the orders they had given for ensurance (it being war-time) and for autumnal goods; but their anxiety availed nothing; his lordship's letters were not ready: and yet, whoever waited on him found him always at his desk, pen in hand, and concluded he must needs write abundantly. Going myself one morning to pay my respects, I found in his antechamber one Innis, a messenger of Philadelphia, who had come thence express, with a packet from Governor Denny for the general. He delivered to me some letters from my friends there, which occasioned my inquiring when he was to return, and where he lodged, that I might send some letters by him. He told me he was ordered to call to-morrow at nine for the general's answer to the governor, and should set off immediately; I put my letters into his hands the same day. A fortnight after I met him again in the same place. "So you are soon returned, Innis!" "Returned; no, I am not gone yet." "How so?" "I have called here this and every morning these two weeks past for his lordship's letters, and they are not yet ready." "Is it possible, when he is so great a writer; for I see him constantly at his escritoir." "Yes," said Innis, "but he is like St. George on the signs; always on horseback but never rides on." This observation[Pg 184] of the messenger was, it seems, well founded; for, when in England, I understood that Mr. Pitt (afterward Lord Chatham) gave it as one reason for removing this general and sending Generals Amherst and Wolf, that the minister never heard from him, and could not know what he was doing.

He left for New York before I did, and since he was in charge of the schedule for the packet boats, I asked him about the exact departure time for the two boats remaining there. He told me, "I've said she’s leaving this Saturday, but just between us, if you get there by Monday morning, you’ll be fine. But don’t delay too long!" Due to some unexpected holdup at a ferry, I didn’t arrive until Monday noon, and I worried that the boat might have already left since the wind was favorable. However, I quickly relaxed when I learned that she was still in the harbor and wouldn’t depart until the next day. You might think I was about to head off to Europe; I thought I was, too, but I didn’t fully understand his lordship's nature at that time, which was heavily marked by indecision. I’ll give you some examples. I arrived in New York at the beginning of April, and I believe we didn’t set sail until nearly the end of June. There were two packet boats that had been ready for a while but were held up waiting for letters from the general, which were always promised “tomorrow.” Another packet arrived, and it too was delayed, and by the time we finally sailed, a fourth one was expected. Ours was the first to be sent out since it had been there the longest. Passengers were lined up for each boat, with some extremely eager to leave, while merchants were anxious about their letters and the orders they placed for insurance (since it was wartime) and for autumn goods; yet their worry did them no good because his lordship’s letters weren’t ready. Still, anyone who visited him found him at his desk, pen in hand, and assumed he must be writing a lot. One morning, when I went to pay my respects, I found a messenger named Innis in his antechamber. He had come from Philadelphia with a packet from Governor Denny for the general. He gave me some letters from my friends there, which led me to ask when he was heading back and where he was staying so I could send some letters with him. He told me he was scheduled to return the next morning at nine for the general’s reply to the governor and would leave right after. I handed him my letters that same day. A fortnight later, I saw him again in the same spot. "So you've returned quickly, Innis!" I said. "Returned? No, I haven’t gone yet." "What do you mean?" "I’ve come here every morning for the past two weeks for his lordship's letters, and they're still not ready." "Is that possible when he writes so much? I see him at his desk all the time." "Yes," Innis replied, "but he’s like St. George on the signs; always on horseback but never rides off." This observation from the messenger turned out to be accurate, as I later learned in England that Mr. Pitt (later Lord Chatham) cited it as one reason for replacing this general and sending Generals Amherst and Wolfe instead, stating that the minister never heard from him and couldn't know what he was up to.

This daily expectation of sailing, and all the three packets going down to Sandy Hook to join the fleet there, the passengers thought it best to be on board, lest, by a sudden order, the ships should sail and they be left behind. There, if I remember, we were about six weeks, consuming our sea stores and obliged to procure more. At length the fleet sailed, the general and all his army on board bound to Louisburg, with intent to besiege and take that fortress; all the packet-boats in company ordered to attend the general's ship, ready to receive his despatches when they should be ready. We were out five days before we got a letter with leave to part, and then our ship quitted the fleet and steered for England. The other two packets he still detained, carried them with him to Halifax, where he stayed some time to exercise his men in sham attacks upon sham forts; then altered his mind as to besieging Louisburg, and returned to New-York with all his troops, together with the two packets above mentioned, and all their passengers! During his absence the French and savages had taken Fort George, on the frontier of that province, and the Indians had massacred many of the garrison after capitulation. I saw afterward in London Captain Bound, who commanded one of those packets; he told me that when he had been detained a month, he acquainted his lordship that his ship was grown foul to a degree that must necessarily hinder her fast sailing (a point of consequence for a packet-boat), and requested an allowance of time to heave her down and clean her bottom. His lordship asked how long a time that would require. He answered,[Pg 185] Three days. The general replied, "If you can do it in one day, I give leave, otherwise not; for you must certainly sail the day after to-morrow." So he never obtained leave, though detained afterward from day to day during full three months. I saw also in London one of Bonell's passengers, who was so enraged against his lordship for deceiving and detaining him so long at New-York, and then carrying him to Halifax and back again, that he swore he would sue him for damages. Whether he did or not I never heard; but, as he represented it, the injury to his affairs was very considerable. On the whole, I wondered much how such a man came to be intrusted with so important a business as the conduct of a great army: but having since seen more of the great world, and the means of obtaining, and motives for giving places and employments, my wonder is diminished. General Shirley, on whom the command of the army devolved upon the death of Braddock, would, in my opinion, if continued in place, have made a much better campaign than that of Loudon in 1756, which was frivolous, expensive, and disgraceful to our nation beyond conception. For though Shirley was not bred a soldier, he was sensible and sagacious in himself, and attentive to good advice from others, capable of forming judicious plans, and quick and active in carrying them into execution. Loudon, instead of defending the colonies with his great army, left them totally exposed, while he paraded idly at Halifax, by which means Fort George was lost; besides, he deranged all our mercantile operations, and distressed our trade by a long embargo on the exportation of provisions, on pretence of keeping supplies from being obtained by the enemy, but in reality for beating down their price in favour of the contractors, in whose profits, it was said (perhaps from suspicion only), he had a share; and when at length the embargo was taken off, neglected to send notice of it[Pg 186] to Charleston, where the Carolina fleet was detained near three months, and whereby their bottoms were so much damaged by the worm that a great part of them foundered in their passage home. Shirley was, I believe, sincerely glad of being relieved from so burdensome a charge as the conduct of an army must be to a man unacquainted with military business. I was at the entertainment given by the city of New-York to Lord Loudon, on his taking upon him the command. Shirley, though thereby superseded, was present also. There was a great company of officers, citizens, and strangers; and some chairs having been borrowed in the neighbourhood, there was one among them very low, which fell to the lot of Mr. Shirley. I sat by him, and perceiving it, I said, they have given you a very low seat. "No matter, Mr. Franklin," said he, "I find a low seat the easiest."

This daily expectation of sailing, along with all three packet ships heading down to Sandy Hook to join the fleet there, made the passengers think it was best to be on board. They worried that, with a sudden order, the ships might leave, and they would be left behind. If I remember correctly, we spent about six weeks there, using up our sea supplies and needing to get more. Eventually, the fleet sailed, with the general and his entire army on board, heading to Louisburg to lay siege to that fortress. All the packet boats were ordered to accompany the general's ship, ready to receive his messages when they were ready. We waited five days before we got a letter allowing us to leave, and then our ship left the fleet and headed for England. The other two packets remained with the fleet, which took them to Halifax, where the general stayed for a while to drill his men with practice attacks on fake forts. Then he changed his mind about besieging Louisburg and returned to New York with all his troops, along with the two packets and all their passengers! During his absence, the French and Native Americans captured Fort George on the frontier of that province, and the Indians massacred many of the garrison after they surrendered. Later, I saw Captain Bound in London, who commanded one of those packets. He told me that after being held for a month, he informed his lordship that his ship had become so dirty that it would hinder its speed (which is crucial for a packet boat) and requested some time to clean it. His lordship asked how long that would take. He replied,[Pg 185] "Three days." The general said, "If you can do it in one day, go ahead. If not, you need to set sail the day after tomorrow." So, he never got permission, even though he was delayed day after day for nearly three months. I also met one of Bonell's passengers in London, who was furious with his lordship for deceiving and keeping him in New York for so long, then taking him to Halifax and back again. He swore he'd sue him for damages. Whether he did or not, I never heard; but from what he said, he suffered significant losses. Overall, I was surprised that such a man was entrusted with such an important responsibility as leading a large army. However, after seeing more of the real world and understanding how people are appointed to jobs and positions, my surprise diminished. I believe that General Shirley, who took command of the army after Braddock's death, would have managed a much better campaign than Loudon did in 1756, which was pointless, costly, and humiliating for our nation. Although Shirley wasn't formally trained as a soldier, he was sensible and wise, open to good advice, capable of creating sound plans, and quick to act on them. On the other hand, Loudon, instead of protecting the colonies with his large army, left them completely vulnerable while he idly paraded in Halifax, which led to the loss of Fort George. Additionally, his actions disrupted all our commercial activities and hurt our trade due to a long embargo on exporting food, claiming it was to prevent the enemy from getting supplies, but in reality, it was to drive down prices for the contractors—allegedly he had a stake in those profits. When the embargo was finally lifted, he failed to inform Charleston, where the Carolina fleet was stuck for nearly three months, leading to serious damage to their ships from worms, causing many to sink on their way back home. I believe Shirley was genuinely relieved to be freed from the heavy responsibility of leading an army, especially for someone unfamiliar with military matters. I attended the event hosted by New York City for Lord Loudon when he took command. Shirley, although no longer in charge, was also present. There was a large crowd of officers, citizens, and guests, and since some chairs had been borrowed from the neighborhood, one of them was really low, and it ended up being Shirley's. I was sitting next to him, noticed it, and said, "They've given you a really low seat." "No worries, Mr. Franklin," he replied, "I find a low seat the easiest."

While I was, as before mentioned, detained at New-York, I received all the accounts of the provisions, &c., that I had furnished to Braddock, some of which accounts could not sooner be obtained from the different persons I had employed to assist in the business; I presented them to Lord Loudon, desiring to be paid the balance. He caused them to be examined by the proper officer, who, after comparing every article with its voucher, certified them to be right; and his lordship promised to give me an order on the paymaster for the balance due to me. This was, however, put off from time to time; and though I called often for it by appointment, I did not get it. At length, just before my departure, he told me he had, on better consideration, concluded not to mix his accounts with those of his predecessors. "And you," said he, "when in England, have only to exhibit your accounts to the treasury, and you will be paid immediately." I mentioned, but without effect, a great and unexpected expense I had been put to by being detained[Pg 187] so long at New-York, as a reason for my desiring to be presently paid; and on my observing that it was not right I should be put to any farther trouble or delay in obtaining the money I had advanced, as I charged no commission for my service, "Oh," said he, "you must not think of persuading us that you are no gainer: we understand better those matters, and know that every one concerned in supplying the army, finds means, in the doing it, to fill his own pockets." I assured him that was not my case, and that I had not pocketed a farthing; but he appeared clearly not to believe me; and, indeed, I afterward learned, that immense fortunes are often made in such employments: as to my balance, I am not paid it to this day, of which more hereafter.

While I was, as mentioned before, stuck in New York, I received all the accounts for the supplies, etc., that I had provided to Braddock. Some of these accounts could not be obtained sooner from the various people I had hired to assist with the job. I presented them to Lord Loudon, asking to be paid the balance. He had them examined by the proper officer, who certified that everything matched the vouchers. His lordship promised to give me an order on the paymaster for the amount owed to me. However, this was repeatedly delayed, and despite often asking for it by appointment, I didn't receive it. Finally, just before I was set to leave, he told me that after further consideration, he decided not to mix his accounts with those of his predecessors. "And you," he said, "when in England, just need to show your accounts to the treasury, and you’ll be paid right away." I mentioned, without any effect, a significant and unexpected expense I had incurred from being stuck in New York for so long, as a reason for wanting immediate payment. When I pointed out that it wasn't fair for me to experience any further trouble or delays in getting back the money I had advanced, since I charged no commission for my services, he replied, "Oh, you shouldn't think you’re not benefiting in some way. We know how it works, and everyone involved in supplying the army finds a way to profit." I assured him that wasn't my situation and that I hadn't made a penny, but he clearly didn't believe me. In fact, I later learned that huge fortunes are often made in such jobs. As for my balance, I still haven't been paid to this day, more on that later.

Our captain of the packet boasted much before we sailed of the swiftness of his ship; unfortunately, when we came to sea, she proved the dullest of ninety-six sail, to his no small mortification. After many conjectures respecting the cause, when we were near another ship, almost as dull as ours, which, however, gained upon us, the captain ordered all hands to come aft, and stand as near the ensign staff as possible. We were, passengers included, about forty persons; while we stood there, the ship mended her pace, and soon left her neighbour far behind, which proved clearly what our captain suspected, that she was loaded too much by the head. The casks of water, it seems, had been placed forward; these he therefore ordered to be moved farther aft, on which the ship recovered her character, and proved the best sailer in the fleet. The captain said she had once gone at the rate of thirteen knots, which is accounted thirteen miles per hour. We had on board, as a passenger, Captain Archibald Kennedy, of the royal navy, afterward Earl of Cassilis, who contended that it was impossible, and that no ship ever sailed so fast, and that there must have been some error in the division[Pg 188] of the logline, or some mistake in heaving the log. A wager ensued between the two captains, to be decided when there should be sufficient wind: Kennedy therefore examined the logline, and, being satisfied with it, he determined to throw the log himself. Some days after, when the wind was very fair and fresh, and the captain of the packet (Lutwidge) said he believed she then went at the rate of thirteen knots, Kennedy made the experiment, and owned his wager lost. The foregoing fact I give for the sake of the following observation: it has been remarked, as an imperfection in the art of shipbuilding, that it can never be known till she is tried whether a new ship will or will not be a good sailer; for that the model of a good sailing ship has been exactly followed in a new one, which has been proved, on the contrary, remarkably dull. I apprehend that this may partly be occasioned by the different opinions of seamen respecting the modes of loading, rigging, and sailing of a ship; each has his method; and the same vessel, laden by the method and orders of one captain, shall sail worse than when by the orders of another. Besides, it scarce ever happens that a ship is formed, fitted for the sea, and sailed by the same person; one man builds the hull, another rigs her, a third loads and sails her. No one of these has the advantage of knowing all the ideas and experience of the others, and, therefore, cannot draw just conclusions from a combination of the whole. Even in the simple operation of sailing when at sea, I have often observed different judgments in the officers who commanded the successive watches, the wind being the same. One would have the sails trimmed sharper than another, so that they seemed to have no certain rule to govern by. Yet I think a set of experiments might be instituted, first, to determine the most proper form of the hull for swift sailing; next, the best dimensions and[Pg 189] most proper place for the masts; then the form and quantity of sails, and their position as the winds may be; and, lastly, the disposition of the lading. This is an age of experiments, and I think a set accurately made and combined would be of great use.

Our ship's captain talked a lot about how fast his vessel was before we set sail; unfortunately, once we were out on the water, it turned out to be the slowest of the ninety-six ships, which was quite frustrating for him. After several guesses about why this was happening, when we got close to another ship, which was almost as slow as ours but somehow started pulling ahead, the captain had everyone gather near the flagpole. There were about forty of us, including passengers. While we stood there, the ship picked up speed and quickly left the other ship behind, confirming what the captain suspected: she was too heavily loaded at the front. It turned out the water barrels were stored too far forward, so he had them moved further back, and the ship got its speed back, becoming the fastest in the fleet. The captain claimed it had once traveled at thirteen knots, which is about thirteen miles per hour. Among the passengers was Captain Archibald Kennedy of the royal navy, later the Earl of Cassilis, who argued that it was impossible for any ship to sail that fast, suggesting there must have been an error in measuring the log or recording it. A bet was placed between the two captains to settle the matter when the wind was right: Kennedy examined the log and, satisfied, decided to take the measurements himself. A few days later, when the wind was fair and strong, and the packet’s captain (Lutwidge) claimed they were going at thirteen knots, Kennedy conducted the test and admitted he lost the bet. I mention this to highlight a point: it’s been noted as a flaw in shipbuilding that you can never know if a new ship will sail well until it’s actually out at sea; sometimes, a new ship built to a proven design can end up sailing poorly. I think part of this might stem from the differing views among sailors about how to load, rig, and sail a ship; everyone has their own method, and the same ship loaded according to one captain's orders can perform worse than if it were loaded by someone else. Moreover, it rarely happens that a ship is built, outfitted, and sailed by the same person; one person builds the hull, another rigs it, and a third loads and sails it. None of them fully knows the ideas and experience of the others, which prevents them from making well-informed decisions as a team. Even during the simple act of sailing, I've often noticed different judgments from the officers on various watches, despite the same wind conditions. One would adjust the sails tighter than another, making it seem like there was no clear rule to follow. Still, I believe we could conduct a series of experiments to figure out the best hull shape for fast sailing, the optimal dimensions and placement for masts, the ideal size and arrangement of sails depending on the wind, and finally, the best way to stow cargo. This is an age of experimentation, and I think a well-structured and coordinated approach could be very beneficial.

We were several times chased in our passage, but outsailed everything; and in thirty days had soundings. We had a good observation, and the captain judged himself so near our port (Falmouth), that if we made a good run in the night, we might be off the mouth of that harbour in the morning; and, by running in the night, might escape the notice of the enemy's privateers, who often cruised near the entrance of the channel. Accordingly all sail was set that we could possibly carry, and the wind being very fresh and fair, we stood right before it, and made great way. The captain, after his observation, shaped his course, as he thought, so as to pass wide of the Scilly rocks; but it seems there is sometimes a strong current setting up St. George's Channel, which formerly caused the loss of Sir Cloudesley Shovel's Squadron (in 1707): this was probably also the cause of what happened to us. We had a watchman placed in the bow, to whom they often called, "Look well out before there;" and he as often answered, "Ay, ay;" but perhaps had his eyes shut, and was half asleep at the time; they sometimes answering, as is said, mechanically: for he did not see a light just before us, which had been hid by the studding sails from the man at the helm and from the rest of the watch, but by an accidental yaw of the ship was discovered, and occasioned a great alarm, we being very near it; the light appearing to me as large as a cart wheel. It was midnight, and our captain fast asleep; but Captain Kennedy, jumping upon deck and seeing the danger, ordered the ship to wear round, all sails standing; an operation dangerous to the masts, but it carried us clear, and[Pg 190] we avoided shipwreck, for we were running fast on the rocks on which the light was erected. This deliverance impressed me strong with the utility of light-houses, and made me resolve to encourage the building some of them in America, if I should live to return thither.

We were chased several times on our journey, but we outsailed everything; and after thirty days, we had soundings. We had a good observation, and the captain believed we were close to our port (Falmouth), so if we had a good run through the night, we could be off the entrance of that harbor by morning. By running at night, we might avoid being noticed by the enemy's privateers, who often cruised near the entrance to the channel. So we set all the sails we could possibly carry, and with the wind blowing fresh and fair, we went right before it and made great progress. After his observation, the captain plotted a course that he thought would take us safely wide of the Scilly rocks; however, it seems there can sometimes be a strong current running up St. George's Channel, which had previously caused the loss of Sir Cloudesley Shovel's Squadron in 1707. This was probably also the reason for what happened to us. We had a lookout placed at the bow, and they often called to him, "Look well out before there;" and he often responded, "Ay, ay;" but perhaps he had his eyes closed and was half asleep at the time; sometimes they responded, as is said, mechanically. He didn't see a light just ahead of us, which had been blocked from the view of the helmsman and the rest of the watch by the studding sails, but the ship made a slight turn that revealed it, causing a great alarm since we were very close to it; the light looked as big as a cartwheel to me. It was midnight, and our captain was sound asleep; but Captain Kennedy jumped onto the deck and, seeing the danger, ordered the ship to turn around, all sails set; a maneuver that was dangerous for the masts, but it got us clear, and[Pg 190] we avoided shipwreck as we were quickly approaching the rocks where the light was located. This rescue made a strong impression on me about the importance of lighthouses and encouraged me to think about promoting the construction of some in America if I lived to return there.

In the morning it was found by our soundings, &c., that we were near our port, but a thick fog hid the land from our sight. About nine o'clock the fog began to rise, and seemed to be lifted up from the water like the curtain of a theatre, discovering underneath the town of Falmouth, the vessels in the harbour, and the fields that surround it. This was a pleasing spectacle to those who had been long without any other prospect than the uniform view of a vacant ocean! and it gave us the more pleasure, as we were now free from the anxieties which had arisen.[13]

In the morning, our soundings and observations revealed that we were close to port, but a thick fog concealed the land from view. Around nine o'clock, the fog started to lift, rising from the water like a theater curtain, revealing the town of Falmouth, the ships in the harbor, and the surrounding fields. It was a delightful sight for those who had spent a long time gazing at nothing but an endless ocean! It brought us even more joy since we were now free from the worries we had been feeling.[13]

I set out immediately, with my son,[14] for London, and we only stopped a little by the way to view Stonehenge, on Salisbury Plain; and Lord Pembroke's house and gardens, with the very curious antiquities at Wilton.

I immediately headed out for London with my son,[14] and we only paused briefly to check out Stonehenge on Salisbury Plain, as well as Lord Pembroke's house and gardens, along with the interesting antiques at Wilton.

We arrived in London, July 27th, 1757.

We arrived in London on July 27, 1757.

[Conclusion of Memoirs written by himself.]

[Conclusion of Memoirs written by himself.]

FOOTNOTES:

[10] This little book is dated Sunday, 1st July, 1773, and is in the possession of Mr. W. T. Franklin: a copy was also in the possession of the late B. T. Bache.

[10] This small book is dated Sunday, July 1st, 1773, and is owned by Mr. W. T. Franklin: a copy was also owned by the late B. T. Bache.

[11] Fothergill (John), F.R.S., an eminent physician, born in 1712, at Carr End, in Yorkshire, of Quaker parents, died in 1780.

[11] John Fothergill, F.R.S., a prominent physician, was born in 1712 in Carr End, Yorkshire, to Quaker parents, and he passed away in 1780.

[12] Dr. Franklin gives a farther account of his election in the following extract of a letter to his son, Governor Franklin.

[12] Dr. Franklin provides additional details about his election in the following excerpt from a letter to his son, Governor Franklin.

"London, Dec. 19, 1767

"London, Dec. 19, 1767

"We have had an ugly affair at the Royal Society lately. One Dacosti, a Jew, who, as our clerk, was intrusted with collecting our moneys, has been so unfaithful as to embezzle near thirteen hundred pounds in four years. Being one of the council this year as well as the last, I have been employed all the last week in attending the inquiry into, and unravelling his accounts, in order to come at a full knowledge of his frauds. His securities are bound in one thousand pounds to the society, which they will pay, but we are like to lose the rest. He had this year received twenty-six admission payments of twenty-five guineas each, which he did not bring to account.

"We’ve had a serious issue at the Royal Society recently. A man named Dacosti, who is a Jewish clerk responsible for collecting our funds, has been disloyal and embezzled nearly thirteen hundred pounds over the past four years. Since I’ve been on the council this year and last, I’ve spent the entire past week looking into his accounts to determine the extent of his fraud. His guarantors owe one thousand pounds to the society, which they will pay, but we’re likely to lose the rest. This year, he received twenty-six admission fees of twenty-five guineas each that he didn’t report."

"While attending this affair, I had an opportunity of looking over the old council books and journals of the society; and having a curiosity to see how I came in (of which I had never been informed), I looked back for the minutes relating to it. You must know it is not usual to admit persons that have not requested to be admitted; and a recommendatory certificate in favour of the candidate, signed by at least three of the members is by our rule to be presented to the society, expressing that he is desirous of that honour, and is so and so qualified. As I had never asked or expected the honour, I was, as I said before, curious to see how the business was managed. I found that the certificate, worded very advantageously for me, was signed by Lord Macclesfield, then president, Lord Parker, and Lord Willoughby; that the election was by a unanimous vote; and the honour being voluntarily conferred by the society unsolicited by me, it was thought wrong to demand or receive the usual fees or composition; so that my name was entered on the list with a vote of council that I was not to pay anything. And, accordingly, nothing has ever been demanded of me. Those who are admitted in the common way pay five guineas as admission fees, and two guineas and a half yearly contribution, or twenty five guineas down in lieu of it. In my case a substantial favour accompanied the honour."

"While attending this event, I had the opportunity to look through the old council books and journals of the society. Out of curiosity about how I became a member (which I had never been informed of), I checked the minutes related to it. You should know that it’s uncommon for people to be admitted without a request. A recommendation certificate in favor of the candidate, signed by at least three members, must be presented to the society, stating that the individual is keen on that honor and is suitably qualified. Since I had never asked for or expected this honor, I was curious to see how it occurred. I found that the certificate, which was worded very favorably for me, was signed by Lord Macclesfield, who was then president, Lord Parker, and Lord Willoughby. The election was unanimous, and since the society voluntarily granted the honor without my request, it was deemed inappropriate to ask for or accept the usual fees. Therefore, my name was added to the list with a council vote that stated that I was not to pay anything. As a result, nothing has ever been requested from me. Typically, those who join the standard way pay five guineas for admission fees and two and a half guineas for a yearly contribution, or they can pay twenty-five guineas upfront instead. In my case, a significant favor came with the honor."

[13] In a letter from Dr. Franklin to his wife, dated at Falmouth, the 17th July, 1757, after giving her a similar account of his voyage, escape, and landing, he adds, "The bell ringing for church, we went thither immediately, and, with hearts full of gratitude, returned sincere thanks to God for the mercies we had received."

[13] In a letter from Dr. Franklin to his wife, dated Falmouth, July 17, 1757, after sharing a similar story about his voyage, escape, and landing, he adds, "When the church bell rang, we went there right away and, with grateful hearts, offered sincere thanks to God for the blessings we had received."

[14] William Franklin, afterward governor of New-Jersey.

[14] William Franklin, who later became the governor of New Jersey.


PART III.

[Continuation by Dr. Stuber.[15]]

[Continuation by Dr. Stuber.__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__]

Dr. Franklin having mentioned his electrical discoveries only in a very transient manner in the preceding memoirs, some farther account of them cannot fail to be interesting.

Dr. Franklin briefly mentioned his electrical discoveries in the previous memoirs, so a more detailed account of them will definitely be interesting.

He engaged in a course of electrical experiments with all the ardour and thirst for discovery which characterized the philosophers of that day. Of all the branches of experimental philosophy, electricity had been least explored. The attractive power of amber is mentioned by Theophrastus and Pliny, and from them by later naturalists. In the year 1600, Gilbert, an English physician, enlarged considerably the catalogue of substances which have the property[Pg 192] of attracting light bodies. Boyle, Otto Guericke, a burgomaster of Magdeburg, celebrated as the inventor of the airpump, Dr. Wall, and Sir Isaac Newton, added some facts. Guericke first observed the repulsive power of electricity, and the light and noise produced by it. In 1709, Hawkesbec communicated some important observations and experiments to the world. For several years electricity was entirely neglected, until Mr. Grey applied himself to it, in 1728, with great assiduity. He and his friend Mr. Wheeler made a great variety of experiments; in which they demonstrated that electricity may be communicated from one body to another, even without being in contact, and in this way may be conducted to a great distance. Mr. Grey afterward found that, by suspending rods of iron by silk or hair lines, and bringing an excited tube under them, sparks might be drawn, and a light perceived at the extremities in the dark. M. du Faye, intendant of the French king's gardens, made a number of experiments, which added not a little to the science. He made the discovery of two kinds of electricity, which he called vitreous and resinous; the former produced by rubbing glass, the latter from excited sulphur, sealing-wax, &c. But this idea he afterward gave up as erroneous. Between the year 1739 and 1742, Desauguliers made a number of experiments, but added little of importance. He first used the terms conductors and electrics per se. In 1742, several ingenious Germans engaged in this subject; of these the principal were, Professor Boze, of Wittemberg, Professor Winkler, of Leipsic, Gordon, a Scotch Benedictine monk, professor of philosophy at Erfurt, and Dr. Ludolf, of Berlin. The result of their researches astonished the philosophers of Europe. Their apparatus was large, and by means of it they were enabled to collect large quantities of the electric fluid, and thus to produce phenomena which had been hitherto unobserved.[Pg 193] They killed small birds, and set spirits on fire. Their experiments excited the curiosity of other philosophers. Collinson, about the year 1745, sent to the Library Company of Philadelphia an account of these experiments, together with a tube, and directions how to use it. Franklin, with some of his friends, immediately engaged in a course of experiments, the result of which is well known. He was enabled to make a number of important discoveries, and to propose theories to account for various phenomena; which have been universally adopted, and which bid fair to endure for ages. His observations he communicated in a series of letters, to his friend Collinson, the first of which is dated March 28, 1747. In these he shows the power of points in draining and throwing off the electrical matter, which had hitherto escaped the notice of electricians. He also made the grand discovery of a plus and minus, or of a positive and negative state of electricity. We give him the honour of this without hesitation, although the English have claimed it for their countryman, Dr. Watson. Watson's paper is dated January 21, 1748; Franklin's July 11, 1747; several months prior. Shortly after, Franklin, from his principles of the plus and minus state, explained, in a satisfactory manner, the phenomena of the Leyden vial, first observed by Mr. Cuneus, or by Professor Muschenbroeck, of Leyden, which had much perplexed philosophers. He showed clearly that the bottle, when charged, contained no more electricity than before, but that as much was taken from one side as was thrown on the other; and that, to discharge it, nothing was necessary but to produce a communication between the two sides by which the equilibrium might be restored, and that then no signs of electricity would remain. He afterward demonstrated, by experiments, that the electricity did not reside in the coating, as had been supposed, but in the pores of[Pg 194] the glass itself. After a vial was charged, he removed the coating, and found that, upon applying a new coating, the shock might still be received. In the year 1749, he first suggested his idea of explaining the phenomena of thunder-gusts, and of the aurora borealis, upon electrical principles. He points out many particulars in which lightning and electricity agree: and he adduces many facts, and reasonings from facts, in support of his positions. In the same year he conceived the astonishingly bold and grand idea of ascertaining the truth of his doctrine by actually drawing down the lightning, by means of sharp-pointed iron rods raised into the region of the clouds. Even in this uncertain state, his passion to be useful to mankind displays itself in a powerful manner. Admitting the identity of electricity and lightning, and knowing the power of points in repelling bodies charged with electricity, and in conducting their fire silently and imperceptibly, he suggested the idea of securing houses, ships, &c., from being damaged by lightning, by erecting pointed rods, that should rise some feet above the most elevated part, and descend some feet into the ground or the water. The effect of these, he concluded, would be either to prevent a stroke by repelling the cloud beyond the striking distance, or by drawing off the electrical fire which it contained; or, if they could not effect this, they would at least conduct the electric matter to the earth, without injury to the building.

He took on a series of electrical experiments with all the passion and desire for discovery that defined the thinkers of his time. Out of all the branches of experimental science, electricity had been the least explored. The attractive power of amber was noted by Theophrastus and Pliny, and later by naturalists. In 1600, Gilbert, an English doctor, greatly expanded the list of substances that can attract light objects. Boyle, Otto Guericke—a mayor of Magdeburg known as the inventor of the air pump—Dr. Wall, and Sir Isaac Newton contributed some additional findings. Guericke was the first to notice the repulsive power of electricity, as well as the light and sound it produced. In 1709, Hawkesbec shared some significant observations and experiments with the world. For several years, electricity was largely ignored until Mr. Grey dedicated himself to it in 1728, working diligently. He and his friend Mr. Wheeler conducted a wide variety of experiments, showing that electricity could be transferred from one object to another without direct contact and that it could be conducted over long distances. Mr. Grey later discovered that by hanging iron rods from silk or hair threads and bringing a charged tube near them, sparks could be generated and light could be seen at the tips in the dark. M. du Faye, who managed the French king's gardens, conducted numerous experiments that greatly contributed to the field. He discovered two types of electricity, which he termed vitreous and resinous; the former came from rubbing glass, while the latter was from excited sulfur, sealing wax, etc. However, he eventually abandoned this idea as incorrect. Between 1739 and 1742, Desauguliers performed a number of experiments, but added little of significance. He was the first to use the terms conductors and electrics per se. In 1742, several innovative Germans delved into this subject, including Professor Boze from Wittemberg, Professor Winkler from Leipzig, Gordon, a Scottish Benedictine monk and philosophy professor in Erfurt, and Dr. Ludolf from Berlin. Their findings astonished European thinkers. Their equipment was large and allowed them to gather substantial amounts of electric fluid, producing phenomena that had not been observed before.[Pg 193] They even killed small birds and set spirits ablaze. Their experiments sparked the curiosity of other thinkers. Around 1745, Collinson sent a report on these experiments, along with a tube and instructions on its use, to the Library Company of Philadelphia. Franklin, along with some friends, immediately began a series of experiments, the results of which are well-known. He was able to make several important discoveries and propose theories to explain various phenomena, many of which have been widely accepted and are likely to last for ages. He shared his findings in a series of letters to his friend Collinson, the first dated March 28, 1747. In these letters, he demonstrated how points can drain and discharge electrical matter, a concept that had been overlooked by electricians until then. He also made the groundbreaking discovery of a plus and minus, or positive and negative state of electricity. We acknowledge him for this without hesitation, although the English have claimed it for their compatriot, Dr. Watson. Watson's paper is dated January 21, 1748; Franklin's was on July 11, 1747, several months earlier. Soon after, Franklin explained the Leyden jar phenomena, first observed by Mr. Cuneus or Professor Muschenbroeck of Leyden, using his principles of positive and negative states. He clarified that the jar, when charged, did not contain more electricity than before; rather, as much was taken from one side as was added to the other, and to discharge it, all that was needed was to establish a connection between the two sides to restore equilibrium, resulting in no remaining signs of electricity. He later showed through experiments that electricity did not reside in the outer coating, as previously thought, but in the pores of[Pg 194] the glass itself. After charging a jar, he removed the coating and discovered that upon applying a new coating, a shock could still be experienced. In 1749, he first proposed explaining the phenomena of thunderstorms and the aurora borealis based on electrical principles. He highlighted many similarities between lightning and electricity, supporting his positions with numerous facts and reasoning. In the same year, he conceived the bold idea of testing his theory by attempting to draw down lightning using sharp-pointed iron rods raised into the cloud region. Even in this uncertain endeavor, his desire to benefit humanity was evident. Acknowledging the similarity between electricity and lightning, and understanding the power of points in repelling electrically charged bodies and silently conducting their fire, he suggested securing houses, ships, etc., from lightning damage by erecting pointed rods that would rise several feet above the highest point and extend several feet into the ground or water. He concluded that their effect would be either to prevent a strike by pushing the cloud beyond striking distance or to draw off the electrical charge it contained; or, if neither was possible, they would at least channel the electric matter to the ground without harming the building.

It was not until the summer of 1752 that he was enabled to complete his grand and unparalleled discovery by experiment. The plan which he had originally proposed was to erect on some high tower or other elevated place a sentry-box, from which should rise a pointed iron rod, insulated by being fixed in a cake of resin. Electrified clouds passing over this would, he conceived, impart to it a portion of their electricity, which would be rendered[Pg 195] evident to the senses by sparks being emitted when a key, the knuckle, or other conductor was presented to it. Philadelphia at this time afforded no opportunity of trying an experiment of this kind. While Franklin was waiting for the erection of a spire, it occurred to him that he might have more ready access to the region of clouds by means of a common kite. He prepared one by fastening two cross sticks to a silk handkerchief, which would not suffer so much from the rain as paper. To the upright stick was affixed an iron point. The string was, as usual, of hemp, except the lower end, which was silk. Where the hempen string terminated a key was fastened. With this apparatus, on the appearance of a thunder-gust approaching, he went out into the commons, accompanied by his son, to whom alone he communicated his intentions, well knowing the ridicule which, too generally for the interest of science, awaits unsuccessful experiments in philosophy. He placed himself under a shade to avoid the rain; his kite was raised; a thunder-cloud passed over it; no sign of electricity appeared. He almost despaired of success, when, suddenly, he observed the loose fibres of his string to move towards an erect position. He now presented his knuckle to the key, and received a strong spark. How exquisite must his sensations have been at this moment! On this experiment depended the fate of his theory. If he succeeded, his name would rank high among those who had improved science; if he failed, he must inevitably be subjected to the derision of mankind, or, what is worse, their pity, as a well-meaning man, but a weak, silly projector. The anxiety with which he looked for the result of his experiment may be easily conceived. Doubts and despair had begun to prevail, when the fact was ascertained in so clear a manner, that even the most incredulous could no longer withhold their assent. Repeated sparks were drawn from the key,[Pg 196] a vial was charged, a shock given, and all the experiments made which are usually performed with electricity.

It wasn’t until the summer of 1752 that he was able to finish his groundbreaking and unmatched discovery through experimentation. His original plan was to put a sentry box on a high tower or some elevated spot, with a pointed iron rod that was insulated by being placed in a block of resin. He thought that electrified clouds passing by would transfer some of their electricity to the rod, which would become[Pg 195] evident by sparks flying when a key, his knuckle, or another conductor was brought close to it. At that time, Philadelphia offered no chance to test this kind of experiment. While Franklin waited for the construction of a spire, it struck him that he could more easily reach the clouds using a regular kite. He made one by attaching two cross sticks to a silk handkerchief that wouldn’t be as damaged by rain as paper. An iron point was attached to the upright stick. The string was made of hemp, except for the lower end, which was silk. A key was fastened to the end of the hemp string. With this setup, as a thunderstorm approached, he went out to the commons with his son, the only person he shared his plans with, knowing well the ridicule that often comes with unsuccessful scientific experiments. He took cover from the rain, raised his kite, and waited for a thundercloud to pass over it, but no sign of electricity appeared. He nearly lost hope when suddenly, he noticed the loose fibers of his string standing up. He then held his knuckle to the key and got a strong spark. How incredible his feelings must have been at that moment! The outcome of this experiment was crucial for his theory. If he succeeded, his name would be celebrated among those who advanced science; if he failed, he would face the scorn of people, or even worse, their pity, as a well-intentioned but weak and foolish inventor. It’s easy to imagine the anxiety he felt waiting for the results of his experiment. Doubts and despair started to creep in when the results became so clear that even the greatest skeptics could no longer deny them. Sparks were repeatedly drawn from the key,[Pg 196] a vial was charged, a shock was delivered, and all the typical experiments with electricity were conducted.

About a month before this period, some ingenious Frenchman had completed the discovery in the manner originally proposed by Dr. Franklin. The letters which he sent to Mr. Collinson, it is said, were refused a place in the Transactions of the Royal Society of London. However this may be, Collinson published them in a separate volume, under the title of "New Experiments and Observations on Electricity, made at Philadelphia, in America." They were read with avidity, and soon translated into different languages. A very incorrect French translation fell into the hands of the celebrated Buffon, who, notwithstanding the disadvantages under which the work laboured, was much pleased with it, and repeated the experiments with success. He prevailed on his friend, M. D'Alibard, to give his countrymen a more correct translation of the works of the American electrician. This contributed much towards spreading a knowledge of Franklin's principles in France. The king, Louis XV., hearing of these experiments, expressed a wish to be a spectator of them. A course of experiments was given at the seat of the Duc D'Ayen, at St. Germain, by M. de Lor. The applauses which the king bestowed upon Franklin excited in Buffon, D'Alibard, and De Lor, an earnest desire of ascertaining the truth of his theory of thunder-gust. Buffon erected his apparatus on the tower of Monthar, M. D'Alibard at Mary-la-ville, and De Lor at his house in the Estrapade at Paris, some of the highest ground in that capital. D'Alibard's machine first showed signs of electricity. On the 10th of May, 1752, a thunder-cloud passed it, in the absence of M'Alibard, and a number of sparks were drawn from it by Coiffier, a joiner, with whom D'Alibard had left directions how to proceed, and by M. Raulet[Pg 197] the prior of Mary-la-ville. An account of this experiment was given to the Royal Academy of Sciences, by M. D'Alibard, in a memoir, dated May 13, 1752. On the 18th of May, M. de Lor proved equally successful with the apparatus erected at his own house. These philosophers soon excited those of other parts of Europe to repeat the experiment, among whom none signalized themselves more than Father Beccaria, of Turin, to whose observations science is much indebted. Even the cold regions of Russia were penetrated by the ardour for discovery. Professor Richman bade fair to add much to the stock of knowledge on this subject, when an unfortunate flash from his conductor put a period to his existence. The friends of science will long remember with regret the amiable martyr to electricity.

About a month before this time, a clever Frenchman had made a discovery in the way originally suggested by Dr. Franklin. It’s said that the letters he sent to Mr. Collinson were not published in the Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Regardless, Collinson published them in a separate volume titled "New Experiments and Observations on Electricity, made at Philadelphia, in America." They were read eagerly and soon translated into several languages. An inaccurate French translation reached the famous Buffon, who, despite the issues with the translation, was very impressed and successfully repeated the experiments. He convinced his friend, M. D'Alibard, to create a more accurate translation of the American electrician's work, which significantly helped spread Franklin's ideas in France. The king, Louis XV, hearing about these experiments, expressed a desire to witness them himself. A series of experiments was conducted at the estate of the Duc D’Ayen in St. Germain by M. de Lor. The king's praise for Franklin inspired Buffon, D'Alibard, and De Lor to verify his theory of thunderstorms. Buffon set up his equipment on the tower of Monthar, M. D'Alibard at Mary-la-ville, and De Lor at his home in the Estrapade in Paris, some of the highest points in the city. D'Alibard's machine was the first to show signs of electricity. On May 10, 1752, a thundercloud passed by while M. D'Alibard was away, and several sparks were drawn from it by Coiffier, a carpenter, who had been given instructions by D'Alibard, and by M. Raulet[Pg 197], the prior of Mary-la-ville. M. D'Alibard reported this experiment to the Royal Academy of Sciences in a memoir dated May 13, 1752. On May 18, M. de Lor had similar success with the apparatus set up at his house. These philosophers quickly inspired others across Europe to repeat the experiments, notably Father Beccaria from Turin, whose observations greatly advanced scientific knowledge. Even the cold regions of Russia felt the excitement for discovery. Professor Richman seemed poised to contribute significantly to this field when a tragic spark from his conductor ended his life. The scientific community will long remember this kind martyr to electricity with sorrow.

By these experiments Franklin's theory was established in the most convincing manner. When the truth of it could no longer be doubted, envy and vanity endeavoured to detract from its merit. That an American, an inhabitant of the obscure city of Philadelphia, the name of which was hardly known, should be able to make discoveries and to frame theories which had escaped the notice of the enlightened philosophers of Europe, was too mortifying to be admitted. He must certainly have taken the idea from some one else. An American, a being of an inferior order, make discoveries! Impossible. It was said that the Abbé Nollet, 1748, had suggested the idea of the similarity of lightning and electricity in his Leçons de Physique. It is true that the abbé mentions the idea, but he throws it out as a bare conjecture, and proposes no mode of ascertaining the truth of it. He himself acknowledges that Franklin first entertained the bold thought of bringing lightning from the heavens, by means of pointed rods fixed in the air. The similarity of lightning and electricity is so strong, that we need[Pg 198] not be surprised at notice being taken of it as soon as electrical phenomena became familiar. We find it mentioned by Dr. Wall and Mr. Grey, while the science was in its infancy. But the honor of forming a regular theory of thunder-gusts, of suggesting a mode of determining the truth of it by experiments, and of putting these experiments in practice, and thus establishing the theory upon a firm and solid basis, is incontestibly due to Franklin. D'Alibard, who made the first experiments in France, says that he only followed the tract which Franklin had pointed out.

Through these experiments, Franklin's theory was established in the most convincing way. Once it was undeniable, envy and pride tried to downplay its significance. The fact that an American from the little-known city of Philadelphia could make discoveries and develop theories that had escaped the notice of Europe's enlightened philosophers was too upsetting to accept. He must have copied the idea from someone else. An American, seen as inferior, making discoveries? Impossible. It was claimed that Abbé Nollet, in 1748, had suggested the idea of the similarity between lightning and electricity in his Leçons de Physique. While it's true that the abbé mentions this idea, he presents it merely as a conjecture and offers no way to verify it. He himself acknowledges that Franklin was the first to boldly think of bringing lightning down from the sky using pointed rods placed in the air. The similarity between lightning and electricity is so strong that we shouldn't be surprised it was noticed as soon as electrical phenomena became familiar. Notably, it was mentioned by Dr. Wall and Mr. Grey while the science was still developing. However, the credit for creating a coherent theory of thunder, suggesting a method to confirm it through experiments, and implementing these experiments to establish the theory on a solid foundation undeniably belongs to Franklin. D'Alibard, who conducted the first experiments in France, said he simply followed the path that Franklin had outlined.

It has been of late asserted, that the honour of completing the experiment with the electrical kite does not belong to Franklin. Some late English paragraphs have attributed it to some Frenchman, whose name they do not mention: and the Abbé Bertholon gives it to M. de Romas, assessor to the presideal of Nerac: the English paragraphs probably refer to the same person. But a very slight attention will convince us of the injustice of this procedure: Dr. Franklin's experiment was made in June, 1752, and his letter, giving an account of it, is dated October 19, 1752. M. de Romas made his first attempt on the 14th of May, 1753, but was not successful until the 7th of June, a year after Franklin had completed the discovery, and when it was known to all the philosophers in Europe.

It has recently been claimed that the credit for the experiment with the electrical kite doesn’t belong to Franklin. Some recent English articles have credited it to a Frenchman, whose name they don’t mention; and Abbé Bertholon attributes it to M. de Romas, an assessor to the presidency of Nerac. The English articles likely refer to the same individual. However, a little scrutiny reveals the unfairness of this claim: Dr. Franklin's experiment took place in June 1752, and his letter detailing it is dated October 19, 1752. M. de Romas made his first attempt on May 14, 1753, but he wasn’t successful until June 7, a year after Franklin had completed the discovery, which was already known to all the philosophers in Europe.

Besides these great principles, Franklin's letters on electricity contain a number of facts and hints which have contributed greatly towards reducing this branch of knowledge to a science. His friend, Mr. Kinnersley, communicated to him a discovery of the different kinds of electricity, excited by rubbing glass and sulphur. This, we have said, was first observed by M. du Faye, but it was for many years neglected. The philosophers were disposed to account for the phenomena rather from a difference in the quantity of electricity collected, and[Pg 199] even Du Faye himself seems at last to have adopted this doctrine. Franklin at first entertained the same idea; but, upon repeating the experiment, he perceived that Mr. Kinnersley was right; and that the vitreous and resinous electricity of Du Faye were nothing more than the positive and negative states which he had before observed; and that the glass globe charged positively, or increased the quantity of electricity on the prime conductor, while the globe of sulphur diminishes its natural quantity, or charged negatively. These experiments and observations opened a new field for investigation, upon which electricians entered with avidity, and their labours have added much to the stock of our knowledge.

Besides these great principles, Franklin's letters on electricity include several facts and tips that have significantly helped turn this area of knowledge into a science. His friend, Mr. Kinnersley, shared with him a discovery about the different types of electricity created by rubbing glass and sulfur. This was initially noted by M. du Faye but was ignored for many years. Philosophers tended to explain the phenomenon more based on the differences in the amount of electricity collected, and even Du Faye himself eventually seemed to accept this idea. Franklin initially thought the same way, but upon repeating the experiment, he realized that Mr. Kinnersley was correct—that the vitreous and resinous electricity of Du Faye were simply the positive and negative states he had previously observed, with the glass globe gaining positive charge or increasing the amount of electricity on the prime conductor, while the sulfur globe reduced its natural quantity or charged negatively. These experiments and observations opened up a new area for research, which electricians eagerly explored, and their work has significantly expanded our knowledge.

In September, 1752, Franklin entered upon a course of experiments to determine the state of electricity in the clouds. From a number of experiments he formed this conclusion: "That the clouds of a thunder-gust are most commonly in a negative state of electricity, but sometimes in a positive state;" and from this it follows, as a necessary consequence, "that, for the most part, in thunder-strokes, it is the earth that strikes into the clouds, and not the clouds that strike into the earth." The letter containing these observations is dated in September, 1753; and yet the discovery of ascending thunder has been said to be of a modern date, and has been attributed to the Abbé Bertholon, who published his memoir on the subject in 1776.

In September 1752, Franklin began a series of experiments to figure out the state of electricity in the clouds. From several tests, he concluded, "The clouds during a thunderstorm are usually in a negative state of electricity, but sometimes in a positive state;" and from this, it follows that "most of the time, in lightning strikes, it is the earth that strikes up into the clouds, not the clouds striking down into the earth." The letter with these observations is dated September 1753; yet, the discovery of ascending thunder is often claimed to be more recent and has been credited to Abbé Bertholon, who published his paper on the subject in 1776.

Franklin's letters have been translated into most of the European languages and into Latin. In proportion as they have become known, his principles have been adopted. Some opposition was made to his theories, particularly by the Abbé Nollet, who was, however, feebly supported, while the first philosophers in Europe stepped forth in defence of Franklin's principles, among whom D'Alibard and[Pg 200] Beccaria were the most distinguished. The opposition has gradually ceased, and the Franklinian system is now universally adopted where science flourishes.

Franklin's letters have been translated into most European languages and Latin. As they’ve gained recognition, his principles have been embraced. There was some pushback against his theories, especially from Abbé Nollet, but he had little support, while leading philosophers in Europe defended Franklin's ideas, with D'Alibard and[Pg 200] Beccaria being the most notable. The opposition has slowly faded away, and the Franklinian system is now widely accepted wherever science thrives.

The important practical use which Franklin made of his discoveries, the securing of houses from injury by lightning, has been already mentioned. Pointed conductors are now very common in America; but prejudice has hitherto prevented their general introduction into Europe, notwithstanding the most undoubted proofs of their utility have been given. But mankind can with difficulty be brought to lay aside established practices, or to adopt new ones. And perhaps we have more reason to be surprised that a practice, however rational, which was proposed about forty years ago, should in that time have been adopted in so many places, than that it has not universally prevailed. It is only by degrees that the great body of mankind can be led into new practices, however salutary their tendency. It is now nearly eighty years since inoculation was introduced into Europe and America; and it is so far from being general at present, that it will require one or two centuries to render it so.

The important practical use that Franklin made of his discoveries—protecting houses from lightning damage—has already been mentioned. Pointed conductors are now very common in America, but prejudice has so far prevented their widespread use in Europe, despite clear evidence of their effectiveness. However, people often find it hard to set aside established practices or to adopt new ones. Perhaps we should be more surprised that a logical practice proposed around forty years ago has been adopted in so many places, rather than being surprised that it hasn't become universal. It takes time for the majority of people to embrace new practices, even if they are beneficial. It’s been nearly eighty years since inoculation was introduced in Europe and America; it’s still far from being widespread today, and it may take one or two centuries for it to be fully accepted.

The disputes between the proprietaries and the people of the province continued in full force, although a war was raging on the frontiers. Not even the sense of danger was sufficient to reconcile, for ever so short a time, their jarring interests. The Assembly still insisted upon the justice of taxing the proprietary estates; but the governors constantly refused their assent to this measure, without which no bill could pass into a law. Enraged at the obstinacy, and what they conceived to be the unjust proceedings of their opponents, the Assembly at length determined to apply to the mother country for relief. A petition was addressed to the king in council, stating the inconveniences under which the inhabitants laboured, from the attention of the proprietaries to their[Pg 201] private interest, to the neglect of the general welfare of the community, and praying for redress. Franklin was appointed to present this address, as agent for the province of Pennsylvania, and departed from America in June, 1757. In conformity to the instructions which he had received from the legislature, he held a conference with the proprietaries who then resided in England, and endeavoured to prevail upon them to give up the long-contested point. Finding that they would hearken to no terms of accommodation, he laid his petition before the council. During this time Governor Denny assented to a law imposing a tax, in which no discrimination was made in favour of the estates of the Penn family. They, alarmed at this intelligence and Franklin's exertions, used their utmost endeavours to prevent the royal sanction being given to this law, which they represented as highly iniquitous, designed to throw the burden of supporting government upon them, and calculated to produce the most ruinous consequences to them and their posterity. The cause was amply discussed before the privy council. The Penns found here some strenuous advocates; nor were there wanting some who warmly espoused the side of the people. After some time spent in debate, a proposal was made that Franklin should solemnly engage that the assessment of the tax should be so made as that the proprietary estates should pay no more than a due proportion. This he agreed to perform, the Penn family withdrew their opposition, and tranquillity was thus once more restored to the province.

The conflicts between the proprietors and the people of the province were still intense, even with a war happening on the frontiers. The sense of danger wasn't enough to bridge their conflicting interests, even for a short time. The Assembly kept insisting on the fairness of taxing the proprietary estates, but the governors consistently denied approval for this action, preventing any bill from becoming law. Frustrated by the stubbornness and what they saw as unfair actions from their opponents, the Assembly decided to reach out to the mother country for help. They sent a petition to the king in council, outlining the struggles the residents faced because the proprietors focused on their own interests at the expense of the community's well-being, and requested a resolution. Franklin was chosen to present this petition as the agent for Pennsylvania and left America in June 1757. Following the instructions from the legislature, he met with the proprietors living in England, trying to convince them to let go of the longstanding dispute. When they refused to negotiate, he brought his petition to the council. Meanwhile, Governor Denny agreed to a tax law that didn’t favor the estates of the Penn family. Alarmed by this news and Franklin’s efforts, the Penns did everything they could to stop the royal approval of this law, claiming it was highly unjust and aimed at putting the burden of government support on them, which could result in disastrous consequences for them and their descendants. The matter was thoroughly debated before the privy council. The Penns had some strong supporters, but there were also others who passionately backed the people's side. After some time, a compromise was offered: Franklin would formally commit to ensuring that the tax assessment would be fair, meaning the proprietary estates would only pay their proper share. He agreed to this, the Penn family withdrew their opposition, and peace was restored to the province once again.

The mode in which this dispute was terminated is a striking proof of the high opinion entertained of Franklin's integrity and honour, even by those who considered him as inimical to their views. Nor was their confidence ill-founded. The assessment was made upon the strictest principle of equity;[Pg 202] and the proprietary estates bore only a proportionable share of the expenses of supporting government.

The way this dispute was resolved clearly shows the high regard people had for Franklin's integrity and honor, even from those who saw him as opposed to their interests. And their trust wasn't misplaced. The assessment was carried out based on the strictest standards of fairness; [Pg 202] and the proprietary estates only covered a fair share of the costs of maintaining the government.

After the completion of this important business, Franklin remained at the court of Great Britain as agent for the province of Pennsylvania. The extensive knowledge which he possessed of the situation of the colonies, and the regard which he always manifested for their interests, occasioned his appointment to the same office by the colonies of Massachusetts, Maryland, and Georgia. His conduct, in this situation, was such as rendered him still more dear to his countrymen.

After finishing this important work, Franklin stayed at the court of Great Britain as the representative for Pennsylvania. His deep understanding of the colonies' situation and his consistent concern for their interests led to his appointment by the colonies of Massachusetts, Maryland, and Georgia for the same role. His actions in this position made him even more beloved by his fellow countrymen.

He had now an opportunity of indulging in the society of those friends whom his merits had procured him while at a distance. The regard which they had entertained for him was rather increased by a personal acquaintance. The opposition which had been made to his discoveries in philosophy gradually ceased, and the rewards of literary merit were abundantly conferred upon him. The Royal Society of London, which had at first refused his performances admission into its transactions, now thought it an honour to rank him among its fellows. Other societies of Europe were equally ambitious of calling him a member. The University of St. Andrew, in Scotland, conferred upon him the degree of Doctor of Laws. Its example was followed by the Universities of Edinburgh and Oxford. His correspondence was sought for by the most eminent philosophers of Europe. His letters to these abound with true science, delivered in the most simple, unadorned manner.

He now had a chance to enjoy the company of those friends whose respect he had earned from afar. Their regard for him grew even stronger with personal acquaintance. The pushback against his philosophical discoveries slowly faded, and he was generously rewarded for his literary contributions. The Royal Society of London, which had initially rejected his work, now considered it an honor to include him among its fellows. Other societies in Europe were equally eager to welcome him as a member. The University of St. Andrews in Scotland awarded him an honorary Doctor of Laws degree, followed by similar honors from the Universities of Edinburgh and Oxford. The most distinguished philosophers in Europe sought his correspondence. His letters to them were filled with genuine scientific insights, presented in a clear and straightforward style.

The province of Canada was at this time in the possession of the French, who had originally settled it. The trade with the Indians, for which its situation was very convenient, was exceedingly lucrative. The French traders here found a market for their commodities, and received in return large quantities of rich furs, which they disposed of at a[Pg 203] high price in Europe. While the possession of this country was highly advantageous to France, it was a grievous inconvenience to the inhabitants of the British colonies. The Indians were almost generally desirous to cultivate the friendship of the French, by whom they were abundantly supplied with arms and ammunition. Whenever a war happened, the Indians were ready to fall upon the frontiers; and this they frequently did, even when Great Britain and France were at peace. From these considerations, it appeared to be the interest of Great Britain to gain the possession of Canada. But the importance of such an acquisition was not well understood in England. Franklin about this time published his Canada pamphlet, in which he, in a very forcible manner, pointed out the advantages which would result from the conquest of this province.

The province of Canada was at this time controlled by the French, who had originally settled there. The location was very favorable for trade with the Indigenous peoples, making it extremely profitable. French traders found a market for their goods and received large amounts of valuable furs in return, which they sold at a[Pg 203] high price in Europe. While having this territory was very beneficial for France, it caused significant problems for the people living in the British colonies. The Indigenous groups generally wanted to be allies with the French, who supplied them with plenty of weapons and ammunition. Whenever war broke out, the Indigenous peoples were quick to attack the frontiers, which they often did, even when Great Britain and France were at peace. Given these factors, it seemed to be in Great Britain's interest to take control of Canada. However, the importance of such a move was not well understood in England. Around this time, Franklin published his pamphlet on Canada, where he forcefully highlighted the benefits that would come from conquering the province.

An expedition against it was planned, and the command given to General Wolfe. His success is well known. At the treaty in 1762, France ceded Canada to Great Britain; and by her cession of Louisiana, at the same time, relinquished all her possessions on the continent of America.

An expedition was planned against it, and General Wolfe was given the command. His success is well known. At the treaty in 1762, France handed Canada over to Great Britain; and by giving up Louisiana at the same time, she also relinquished all her territories on the North American continent.

Although Dr. Franklin was now principally occupied with political pursuits, he found time for philosophical studies. He extended his electrical researches, and made a variety of experiments, particularly on the tourmalin. The singular properties which this stone possesses, of being electrified on one side positively, and on the other negatively, by heat alone, without friction, had been but lately observed.

Although Dr. Franklin was now mainly focused on politics, he made time for philosophical studies. He expanded his electrical research and conducted various experiments, especially on tourmaline. The unique properties of this stone—being positively electrified on one side and negatively on the other just by heat, without any friction—had only recently been noticed.

Some experiments on the cold produced by evaporation, made by Dr. Cullen, had been communicated to Dr. Franklin by Professor Simpson, of Glasgow. These he repeated, and found that, by the evaporation of ether in the exhausted receiver of an airpump, so great a degree of cold was produced in a summer's day, that water was converted[Pg 204] into ice. This discovery he applied to the solution of a number of phenomena, particularly a single fact, which philosophers had endeavoured in vain to account for, viz., that the temperature of the human body, when in health, never exceeds 96 degrees of Fahrenheit's thermometer, although the atmosphere which surrounds it may be heated to a much greater degree. This he attributed to the increased perspiration and consequent evaporation produced by the heat.

Some experiments on the cold created by evaporation, conducted by Dr. Cullen, were shared with Dr. Franklin by Professor Simpson from Glasgow. Franklin repeated these experiments and found that by evaporating ether in the vacuum of an air pump, a level of cold was generated on a summer day that caused water to turn[Pg 204] into ice. He applied this discovery to explain several phenomena, particularly one fact that philosophers had unsuccessfully tried to explain: the human body's temperature, when healthy, never exceeds 96 degrees on Fahrenheit's thermometer, even though the surrounding atmosphere can be much hotter. He attributed this to the increased sweating and subsequent evaporation caused by the heat.

In a letter to Mr. Small, of London, dated in May, 1760, Dr. Franklin makes a number of observations, tending to show that, in North America, northeast storms begin in the southwest parts. It appears, from actual observations, that a northeast storm, which extended a considerable distance, commenced at Philadelphia nearly four hours before it was felt at Boston. He endeavoured to account for this by supposing that, from heat, some rarefication takes place about the Gulf of Mexico; that the air farther north, being cooler, rushes in, and is succeeded by the cooler and denser air still farther north, and that thus a continued current is at length produced.

In a letter to Mr. Small in London, dated May 1760, Dr. Franklin shares several observations that suggest northeast storms in North America start in the southwest. Actual observations show that a northeast storm, which covered a significant area, began in Philadelphia nearly four hours before it reached Boston. He tried to explain this by suggesting that heat causes some thinning of the air around the Gulf of Mexico; the cooler air coming in from the north rushes in, followed by even cooler and denser air from farther north, creating a continuous current in the process.

The tone produced by rubbing the brim of a drinking-glass with a wet finger had been generally known. A Mr. Puckeridge, an Irishman, by placing on a table a number of glasses of different sizes, and tuning them, by partly filling them with water, endeavoured to form an instrument capable of playing tunes. He was prevented, by an untimely end, from bringing his invention to any degree of perfection. After his death some improvements were made upon his plan. The sweetness of the tones induced Dr. Franklin to make a variety of experiments; and he at length formed that elegant instrument which he has called the Armonica.

The sound created by rubbing the rim of a drinking glass with a wet finger was already well-known. A Mr. Puckeridge, an Irishman, tried to create an instrument that could play melodies by placing several glasses of different sizes on a table and tuning them by partially filling them with water. Unfortunately, he passed away before perfecting his invention. After he died, some improvements were made to his idea. The lovely sounds inspired Dr. Franklin to conduct various experiments, and he eventually created the elegant instrument he named the Armonica.

In the summer of 1762 he returned to America. On his passage he observed the singular effect produced by the agitation of a vessel containing oil[Pg 205] floating on water. The surface of the oil remains smooth and undisturbed, while the water is agitated with the utmost commotion. No satisfactory explanation of this appearance has, we believe, ever been given.

In the summer of 1762, he returned to America. During his journey, he noticed the unusual effect created when a container holding oil[Pg 205] was floating on water. The surface of the oil stayed smooth and calm, while the water was in complete turmoil. We don't think a clear explanation for this phenomenon has ever been provided.

Dr. Franklin received the thanks of the Assembly of Pennsylvania, "as well for the faithful discharge of his duty to that province in particular, as for the many and important services done to America in general during his residence in Great Britain." A compensation of 5000l., Pennsylvania currency, was also decreed him for his service during six years.

Dr. Franklin received thanks from the Assembly of Pennsylvania, "both for his faithful duty to that province specifically and for the many important services he provided to America in general during his time in Great Britain." He was also awarded a compensation of 5000l., Pennsylvania currency, for his six years of service.

During his absence he had been annually elected member of the Assembly. On his return to Pennsylvania he again took his seat in this body, and continued a steady defender of the liberties of the people.

During his absence, he had been elected as a member of the Assembly every year. Upon his return to Pennsylvania, he took his seat in this body again and remained a consistent defender of the people's freedoms.

In December, 1762, a circumstance which caused great alarm in the province took place. A number of Indians had resided in the county of Lancaster, and conducted themselves uniformly as friends to the white inhabitants. Repeated depredations on the frontiers had exasperated the inhabitants to such a degree, that they determined on revenge upon every Indian. A number of persons, to the amount of about 120, principally inhabitants of Donegal and Peckstang, or Paxton, townships, in the county of York, assembled, and, mounted on horseback, proceeded to the settlement of these harmless and defenceless Indians, whose number had now been reduced to about twenty. The Indians received intelligence of the attack which was intended against them, but disbelieved it. Considering the white people as their friends, they apprehended no danger from them. When the party arrived at the Indian settlement, they found only some women and children, and a few old men, the rest being absent at work. They murdered all whom[Pg 206] they found, and among others the chief Shaheas, who had been always distinguished for his friendship to the whites. This bloody deed excited much indignation in the well-disposed part of the community.

In December 1762, an event that caused a lot of worry in the province occurred. A group of Native Americans had lived in Lancaster County and had consistently acted as friends to the white settlers. However, repeated attacks on the frontiers had angered the settlers to the point where they sought revenge against every Native American. About 120 people, mainly from the Donegal and Peckstang, or Paxton, townships in York County, gathered together and rode out to the settlement of these harmless and defenseless Native Americans, whose number had dwindled to around twenty. The Native Americans received word of the planned attack but didn't believe it. Thinking of the white settlers as their friends, they felt no threat from them. When the group reached the Native American settlement, they found only women, children, and a few elderly men, as the rest were away working. They killed everyone they found, including the chief Shaheas, who had always been known for his friendship toward the white settlers. This brutal act sparked outrage among the more decent members of the community.

The remainder of these unfortunate Indians, who, by absence, had escaped the massacre, were conducted to Lancaster, and lodged in the jail as a place of security. The governor issued a proclamation, expressing the strongest disapprobation of the action, offering a reward for the discovery of the perpetrators of the deed, and prohibiting all injuries to the peaceable Indians in future. But, notwithstanding this, a party of the same men shortly after marched to Lancaster, broke open the jail, and inhumanly butchered the innocent Indians who had been placed there for security. Another proclamation was issued, but it had no effect. A detachment marched down to Philadelphia for the express purpose of murdering some friendly Indians, who had been removed to the city for safety. A number of the citizens armed in their defence. The Quakers, whose principles are opposed to fighting, even in their own defence, were most active upon this occasion. The rioters came to Germantown. The governor fled for safety to the house of Dr. Franklin, who, with some others, advanced to meet the Paxton boys, as they were called, and had influence enough to prevail upon them to relinquish their undertaking and return to their homes.

The remaining unfortunate Indians, who had avoided the massacre by being away, were taken to Lancaster and placed in jail for their safety. The governor issued a proclamation expressing his strong disapproval of the actions, offering a reward for finding those responsible, and banning any harm to peaceful Indians in the future. However, soon after, a group of the same men marched to Lancaster, broke into the jail, and brutally killed the innocent Indians who had been held there for protection. Another proclamation was made, but it had no effect. A group set out for Philadelphia with the intent to murder some friendly Indians who had been relocated to the city for safety. Several citizens armed themselves to protect them. The Quakers, who believe in non-violence even in self-defense, were particularly active in this situation. The rioters made their way to Germantown. The governor sought refuge at Dr. Franklin's house, where he, along with others, stepped in to confront the Paxton boys, as they were called, and managed to persuade them to abandon their plan and return home.

The disputes between the proprietaries and the Assembly, which for a time had subsided, were again revived. The proprietaries were dissatisfied with the concessions made in favour of the people, and made great struggles to recover the privilege of exempting their estates from taxation, which they had been induced to give up.

The conflicts between the owners and the Assembly, which had quieted down for a while, flared up again. The owners were unhappy with the concessions made in favor of the people and fought hard to regain the privilege of exempting their estates from taxes, which they had been persuaded to give up.

In 1763 the Assembly passed a militia bill, to which the governor refused to give his assent, unless[Pg 207] the Assembly would agree to certain amendments which he proposed. These consisted in increasing the fines, and, in some cases, substituting death for fines. He wished, too, that the officers should be appointed altogether by himself, and not be nominated by the people, as the bill had proposed. These amendments the Assembly considered as inconsistent with the spirit of liberty. They would not adopt them; the governor was obstinate, and the bill was lost.

In 1763, the Assembly passed a militia bill, but the governor refused to approve it unless[Pg 207] the Assembly accepted certain amendments he suggested. These changes involved raising the fines and, in some instances, replacing fines with the death penalty. He also wanted all the officers to be appointed solely by him instead of being nominated by the people, as the bill had originally stated. The Assembly viewed these amendments as contradictory to the spirit of freedom. They refused to adopt them; the governor remained stubborn, and the bill failed.

These, and various other circumstances, increased the uneasiness which subsisted between the proprietaries and the Assembly, to such a degree that, in 1764, a petition to the king was agreed to by the house, praying an alteration from a proprietary to a regal government. Great opposition was made to this measure, not only in the house, but in the public prints. A speech of Mr. Dickenson on the subject was published, with a preface by Dr. Smith, in which great pains were taken to show the impropriety and impolicy of this proceeding. A speech of Mr. Golloway, in reply to Mr. Dickenson, was published, accompanied with a preface by Dr. Franklin, in which he ably opposed the principles laid down in the preface to Mr. Dickenson's speech. This application to the throne produced no effect. The proprietary government was still continued.

These and various other factors increased the tension between the proprietors and the Assembly to the point that, in 1764, the house agreed to submit a petition to the king, asking to change from a proprietary to a regal government. There was significant opposition to this move, not only in the house but also in the public press. A speech by Mr. Dickinson on the topic was published, prefaced by Dr. Smith, which took great care to highlight the inappropriateness and bad policy of this action. A speech by Mr. Galloway, responding to Mr. Dickinson, was also published, with a preface by Dr. Franklin, in which he effectively challenged the ideas presented in Dr. Smith's preface to Mr. Dickinson's speech. This appeal to the throne had no impact. The proprietary government continued as it was.

At the election for a new Assembly, in the fall of 1764, the friends of the proprietaries made great exertions to exclude those of the adverse party; and they obtained a small majority in the city of Philadelphia. Franklin now lost his seat in the house, which he had held for fourteen years. On the meeting of the Assembly it appeared that there was still a decided majority of Franklin's friends. He was immediately appointed provincial agent, to the great chagrin of his enemies, who made a solemn protest against this appointment: which was refused admission upon the minutes, as being unprecedented.[Pg 208] It was, however, published in the papers, and produced a spirited reply from him, just before his departure for England.

At the election for a new Assembly in the fall of 1764, the supporters of the proprietors worked hard to exclude those from the opposing party, managing to secure a slight majority in Philadelphia. Franklin lost his seat in the house, which he had held for fourteen years. When the Assembly convened, it was clear that Franklin's supporters still had a strong majority. He was quickly appointed provincial agent, much to the dismay of his opponents, who formally protested this appointment. Their protest was not recorded in the minutes since it was considered unprecedented.[Pg 208] However, it was published in the newspapers, prompting a passionate response from him just before he left for England.

The disturbances produced in America by Mr. Grenville's stamp-act, and the opposition made to it, are well known. Under the Marquis of Rockingham's administration, it appeared expedient to endeavour to calm the minds of the colonists, and the repeal of the odious tax was contemplated. Among other means of collecting information on the disposition of the people to submit to it, Dr. Franklin was called to the bar of the House of Commons. The examination which he here underwent was published, and contains a striking proof of the extent and accuracy of his information, and the facility with which he communicated his sentiments. He represented facts in so strong a point of view, that the expediency of the act must have appeared clear to every unprejudiced mind. The act, after some opposition, was repealed, about a year after it was enacted, and before it had ever been carried into execution.

The turmoil caused in America by Mr. Grenville's Stamp Act and the resistance to it is well known. Under the Marquis of Rockingham's leadership, it seemed necessary to try to calm the colonists, and there was talk of repealing the unpopular tax. To gather information about how the people felt about complying with it, Dr. Franklin was summoned to the House of Commons. The testimony he gave there was published and serves as a compelling example of how extensive and accurate his knowledge was, as well as his ability to express his views clearly. He presented the facts in such a convincing way that the necessity of the act would have been evident to anyone without bias. After some opposition, the act was repealed about a year after it was put in place, and before it was ever enforced.

In the year 1766, he made a visit to Holland and Germany, and received the greatest marks of attention from men of science. In his passage through Holland, he learned from the watermen the effect which a diminution of the quantity of water in canals has in impeding the progress of boats. Upon his return to England, he was led to make a number of experiments, all of which tended to confirm the observation. These, with an explanation of the phenomenon, he communicated in a letter to his friend, Sir John Pringle, which is among his philosophical pieces.

In 1766, he visited Holland and Germany, where he received significant attention from scholars. While in Holland, he learned from the boatmen how a decrease in the amount of water in canals slows down boats. After returning to England, he conducted several experiments that supported his observation. He shared these findings, along with an explanation of the phenomenon, in a letter to his friend, Sir John Pringle, which is included in his philosophical writings.

In the following year he travelled into France, where he met with a no less favourable reception than he had experienced in Germany. He was introduced to a number of literary characters, and to the king, Louis XV.[Pg 209]

In the following year, he traveled to France, where he received just as warm a welcome as he had in Germany. He was introduced to several literary figures and to King Louis XV. [Pg 209]

Several letters, written by Hutchinson, Oliver, and others, to persons in eminent stations in Great Britain, came into the hands of Dr. Franklin. These contained the most violent invectives against the leading characters of the State of Massachusetts, and strenuously advised the prosecution of vigorous measures to compel the people to obedience to the measures of the ministry. These he transmitted to the legislature, by whom they were published. Attested copies of them were sent to Great Britain, with an address, praying the king to discharge from office persons who had rendered themselves obnoxious to the people, and who had shown themselves so unfriendly to their interests. The publication of these letters produced a duel between Mr. Whately and Mr. Temple; each of whom was suspected of having been instrumental in procuring them. To prevent any farther disputes on this subject, Dr. Franklin, in one of the public papers, declared that he had sent them to America, but would give no information concerning the manner in which he had obtained them; nor was this ever discovered.

Several letters, written by Hutchinson, Oliver, and others, to influential people in Great Britain, reached Dr. Franklin. These letters contained harsh criticisms of the key figures in the State of Massachusetts and strongly urged the implementation of strict measures to force the people to comply with the ministry's demands. He sent these to the legislature, which published them. Verified copies were sent to Great Britain, along with a request to the king to remove individuals who had become unpopular with the public and who had shown hostility toward their interests. The release of these letters led to a duel between Mr. Whately and Mr. Temple, both of whom were suspected of being involved in obtaining them. To avoid further conflicts on this issue, Dr. Franklin stated in a public paper that he had sent them to America but would not reveal how he obtained them, and this was never uncovered.

Shortly after, the petition of the Massachusetts Assembly was taken up for examination before the privy council. Dr. Franklin attended as agent for the Assembly; and here a torrent of the most violent and unwarranted abuse was poured upon him by the solicitor-general, Wedderburne, who was engaged as counsel for Oliver and Hutchinson. The petition was declared to be scandalous and vexatious, and the prayer of it refused.

Shortly after, the Massachusetts Assembly's petition was reviewed by the privy council. Dr. Franklin represented the Assembly, and during this time, he faced a wave of extreme and unjust criticism from the solicitor-general, Wedderburne, who was acting as legal counsel for Oliver and Hutchinson. The petition was labeled as scandalous and annoying, and its requests were denied.

Although the parliament of Great Britain had repealed the stamp-act, it was only upon the principle of expediency. They still insisted upon their right to tax the colonies; and, at the same time that the stamp-act was repealed, an act was passed declaring the right of parliament to bind the colonies in all cases whatever. This language was used even by most strenuous opposers of the stamp-act, and,[Pg 210] among others, by Mr. Pitt. This right was never recognised by the colonists; but, as they flattered themselves that it would not be exercised, they were not very active in remonstrating against it. Had this pretended right been suffered to remain dormant, the colonists would cheerfully have furnished their quota of supplies, in the mode to which they had been accustomed; that is, by acts of their own assemblies, in consequence of requisitions from the secretary of state. If this practice had been pursued, such was the disposition of the colonies towards their mother country, that, notwithstanding the disadvantages under which they laboured, from restraints upon their trade, calculated solely for the benefit of the commercial and manufacturing interests of Great Britain, a separation of the two countries might have been a far distant event. The Americans, from their earliest infancy, were taught to venerate a people from whom they were descended; whose language, laws, and manners were the same as their own. They looked up to them as models of perfection; and, in their prejudiced minds, the most enlightened nations of Europe were considered as almost barbarians in comparison with Englishmen. The name of an Englishman conveyed to an American the idea of everything good and great. Such sentiments instilled into them in early life, what but a repetition of unjust treatment could have induced them to entertain the most distant thought of separation! The duties on glass, paper, leather, painters' colours, tea, &c., the disfranchisement of some of the colonies, the obstruction to the measures of the legislature in others by the king's governors, the contemptuous treatment of their humble remonstrances, stating their grievances, and praying a redress of them, and other violent and oppressive measures, at length excited an ardent spirit of opposition. Instead of endeavouring to allay this by a more lenient[Pg 211] conduct, the ministry seemed resolutely bent upon reducing the colonies to the most slavish obedience to their decrees. But this only tended to aggravate. Vain were all the efforts made use of to prevail upon them to lay aside their designs, to convince them of the impossibility of carrying them into effect, and of the mischievous consequences which must ensue from the continuance of the attempt. They persevered with a degree of inflexibility scarcely paralleled.

Although the British Parliament had repealed the Stamp Act, it was only because it was more convenient. They still claimed their right to tax the colonies; and at the same time the Stamp Act was repealed, they passed a law declaring Parliament's right to govern the colonies in all matters whatsoever. This was stated even by those who opposed the Stamp Act the most, including Mr. Pitt. The colonists never accepted this right; however, since they hoped it wouldn't be enforced, they didn't actively protest against it. If this supposed right had been allowed to go unused, the colonists would have willingly provided their share of supplies, as they had always done, through their own assemblies following requests from the Secretary of State. If this practice had continued, because of the colonists' good will towards their home country, a separation might have been a far-off possibility, despite the hardships they faced due to trade restrictions that mainly benefited British commercial and manufacturing interests. From a young age, Americans were taught to admire the people they descended from, whose language, laws, and customs were just like their own. They viewed them as perfect role models, and in their biased views, the most enlightened nations of Europe were seen as almost barbaric compared to the English. To an American, being called English signified everything good and great. What, except repeated unjust treatment, could have led them to even think about separation? The taxes on glass, paper, leather, paint, tea, etc., the stripping of some colonies' rights, the interference with legislative processes in others by the king's governors, the dismissive treatment of their modest protests outlining their complaints and asking for solutions, and other harsh and oppressive actions eventually sparked a strong spirit of resistance. Instead of trying to ease this tension with a more compassionate approach, the government seemed determined to force the colonies into complete submission to their demands. But this only made things worse. All efforts to persuade them to abandon their plans, to show them that achieving them was impossible, and to explain the harmful consequences that would arise from continuing the attempt were in vain. They persisted with a degree of stubbornness that was hardly matched anywhere else.

The advantages which Great Britain derived from her colonies was so great, that nothing but a degree of infatuation little short of madness could have produced a continuance of measures calculated to keep up a spirit of uneasiness, which might occasion the slightest wish for a separation. When we consider the great improvements in the science of government, the general diffusion of the principles of liberty among the people of Europe, the effects which these have already produced in France, and the probable consequences which will result from them elsewhere, all of which are the offspring of the American revolution, it cannot but appear strange that events of so great moment to the happiness of mankind should have been ultimately occasioned by the wickedness or ignorance of a British ministry.

The benefits that Great Britain gained from her colonies were so tremendous that only a level of foolishness close to madness could explain the ongoing actions aimed at fostering a sense of unrest, which could lead to even the slightest desire for separation. When we think about the significant advancements in the science of government, the widespread spread of liberty principles among the people of Europe, the impacts these have already had in France, and the likely outcomes that will arise from this elsewhere—all of which are the results of the American Revolution—it seems quite odd that such significant events for the well-being of humanity were ultimately triggered by the wrongdoing or ignorance of a British government.

Dr. Franklin left nothing untried to prevail upon the ministry to consent to a change of measures. In private conversations, and in letters to persons in government, he continually expatiated upon the impolicy and injustice of their conduct towards America; and stated that, notwithstanding the attachment of the colonists to the mother country, a repetition of ill-treatment must ultimately alienate their affections. They listened not to his advice. They blindly persevered in their own schemes, and left to the colonists no alternative but opposition or unconditional submission. The latter accorded[Pg 212] not with the principles of freedom which they had been taught to revere. To the former they were compelled, though reluctantly, to have recourse.

Dr. Franklin tried everything he could to persuade the government to agree to a change in policy. In private talks and in letters to officials, he repeatedly pointed out the foolishness and unfairness of their treatment of America. He made it clear that, despite the colonists' loyalty to the mother country, continued mistreatment would eventually drive them away. They ignored his advice. They stubbornly continued with their plans, leaving the colonists with no choice but to either resist or submit completely. The latter option did not align with the principles of freedom they had been taught to value. So, they reluctantly had to choose the former.

Dr. Franklin finding all efforts to restore harmony between Great Britain and her colonies useless, returned to America in the year 1775, just after the commencement of hostilities. The day after his return, he was elected by the legislature of Pennsylvania a delegate to Congress. Not long after his election, a committee was appointed, consisting of Mr. Lynch, Mr. Harrison, and himself, to visit the camp at Cambridge, and, in conjunction with the commander-in-chief, to endeavour to convince the troops, whose term of enlistment was about to expire, of the necessity of their continuing in the field, and persevering in the cause of their country.

Dr. Franklin realized that all attempts to restore peace between Great Britain and her colonies were pointless, so he returned to America in 1775, just after the fighting began. The day after he got back, he was elected by the Pennsylvania legislature as a delegate to Congress. Shortly after his election, a committee was formed, made up of Mr. Lynch, Mr. Harrison, and himself, to visit the camp at Cambridge. Their goal, along with the commander-in-chief, was to persuade the troops whose enlistment was about to end to stay in the field and continue fighting for their country.

In the fall of the same year he visited Canada, to endeavour to unite them in the common cause of liberty; but they could not be prevailed upon to oppose the measures of the British government. M. le Roy, in a letter annexed to Abbé Fauchett's eulogium of Dr. Franklin, states that the ill success of this negotiation was occasioned in a great degree by religious animosities, which subsisted between the Canadians and their neighbours, some of whom had, at different times, burned their chapels.

In the fall of the same year, he went to Canada to try to bring them together for the shared goal of freedom, but they were not persuaded to go against the British government's actions. M. le Roy, in a letter included with Abbé Fauchett's tribute to Dr. Franklin, mentions that the failure of this negotiation was largely due to the religious tensions that existed between the Canadians and their neighbors, some of whom had burned their chapels at various times.

When Lord Howe came to America in 1776, vested with power to treat with the colonists, a correspondence took place between him and Dr. Franklin on the subject of a reconciliation. Dr. Franklin was afterward appointed, together with John Adams and Edward Rutledge, to wait upon the commissioners, in order to learn the extent of their powers. These were found to be only to grant pardons upon submission. These were terms which could not be accepted, and the object of the commissioners could not be obtained.

When Lord Howe arrived in America in 1776, given the authority to negotiate with the colonists, there was communication between him and Dr. Franklin about reconciliation. Dr. Franklin was later appointed, along with John Adams and Edward Rutledge, to meet with the commissioners and find out what powers they had. It turned out that their powers were limited to granting pardons if there was submission. These were terms that could not be accepted, and the commissioners' goals could not be achieved.

The momentous question of independence was shortly after brought into view, at a time when the[Pg 213] fleets and armies which were sent to enforce obedience were truly formidable. With an army, numerous indeed, but ignorant of discipline, and entirely unskilled in the art of war, without money, without a fleet, without allies, and with nothing but the love of liberty to support them, the colonists determined to separate from a country from which they had experienced a repetition of injury and insult. In this question Dr. Franklin was decidedly in favour of the measure proposed, and had great influence in bringing others over to his sentiments.

The important question of independence soon came to the forefront, at a time when the[Pg 213] fleets and armies sent to maintain control were truly impressive. With an army that was large but lacking in discipline and completely inexperienced in warfare, without money, without a fleet, without allies, and only fueled by their love of freedom, the colonists decided to break away from a country that had repeatedly harmed and insulted them. In this debate, Dr. Franklin strongly supported the proposed measure and played a significant role in convincing others to share his views.

The public mind had been already prepared for this event by Mr. Paine's celebrated pamphlet, Common Sense. There is good reason to believe that Dr. Franklin had no inconsiderable share at least in furnishing materials for this work.

The public was already primed for this event by Mr. Paine's famous pamphlet, Common Sense. There’s good reason to think that Dr. Franklin played a significant role in providing materials for this work.

In the convention which assembled at Philadelphia in 1776, for the purpose of establishing a new form of government for the State of Pennsylvania, Dr. Franklin was chosen president. The late constitution of this state, which was the result of their deliberations, may be considered as a digest of his principles of government. The single legislature and the plural executive seem to have been his favourite tenets.

In the convention that gathered in Philadelphia in 1776 to create a new government for Pennsylvania, Dr. Franklin was elected president. The new constitution of this state, which came from their discussions, can be seen as a summary of his government principles. The idea of a single legislature and a multiple-executive system appeared to be his preferred beliefs.

In the latter end of 1776, Dr. Franklin was appointed to assist at the negotiation which had been set on foot by Silas Deane, at the court of France. A conviction of the advantages of a commercial intercourse with America, and a desire of weakening the British empire by dismembering it, first induced the French court to listen to proposals of an alliance. But they showed rather a reluctance to the measure, which, by Dr. Franklin's address, and particularly by the success of the American arms against General Burgoyne, was at length overcome; and in February, 1778, a treaty of alliance, offensive and defensive, was concluded; in consequence of which,[Pg 214] France became involved in the war with Great Britain.

In late 1776, Dr. Franklin was appointed to help with the negotiations initiated by Silas Deane at the French court. The French government was initially motivated by the potential benefits of trading with America and the desire to weaken the British Empire by breaking it apart. However, they were somewhat hesitant about the idea. Dr. Franklin's persuasive approach, along with the success of American forces against General Burgoyne, eventually changed their minds. In February 1778, they signed a treaty for an offensive and defensive alliance, which led to France getting involved in the war against Great Britain.

Perhaps no person could have been found more capable of rendering essential services to the United States at the court of France than Dr. Franklin. He was well known as a philosopher, and his character was held in the highest estimation. He was received with the greatest marks of respect by all the literary characters, and this respect was extended among all classes of men. His personal influence was hence very considerable. To the effects of this were added those of various performances which he published, tending to establish the credit and character of the United States. To his exertions in this way may, in no small degree, be ascribed the success of the loans negotiated in Holland and France, which greatly contributed to bringing the war to a happy conclusion.

Perhaps no one could have been more suited to provide essential services to the United States at the French court than Dr. Franklin. He was well-known as a philosopher, and his character was highly regarded. He received the greatest respect from all literary figures, and this respect was extended to all social classes. His personal influence was therefore quite significant. Additionally, his various published works helped to enhance the reputation and credibility of the United States. His efforts in this regard can be largely credited for the success of the loans negotiated in Holland and France, which played a crucial role in bringing the war to a successful conclusion.

The repeated ill success of their arms, and more particularly the capture of Cornwallis and his army, at length convinced the British nation of the impossibility of reducing the Americans to subjection. The trading interest particularly became clamorous for peace. The ministry were unable longer to oppose their wishes. Provisional articles of peace were agreed to, and signed at Paris, on the 30th of November, 1782, by Dr. Franklin, Mr. Adams, Mr. Jay, and Mr. Laurens, on the part of the United States, and by Mr. Oswald on the part of Great Britain. These formed the basis of the definitive treaty, which was concluded the 3d of September, 1783, and signed by Dr. Franklin, Mr. Adams, and Mr. Jay on the one part, and by Mr. David Hartly on the other.

The ongoing failures of their military efforts, especially the capture of Cornwallis and his army, finally convinced the British public that it was impossible to force the Americans into submission. The trading community especially became vocal about wanting peace. The government could no longer ignore their demands. Provisional peace agreements were reached and signed in Paris on November 30, 1782, by Dr. Franklin, Mr. Adams, Mr. Jay, and Mr. Laurens for the United States, and by Mr. Oswald for Great Britain. These agreements laid the groundwork for the final treaty, which was completed on September 3, 1783, and signed by Dr. Franklin, Mr. Adams, and Mr. Jay on one side, and Mr. David Hartly on the other.

On the 3rd of April, 1783, a treaty of Amity and Commerce between the United States and Sweden, was concluded at Paris by Dr. Franklin and the Count Von Krutz.

On April 3, 1783, a Treaty of Amity and Commerce between the United States and Sweden was signed in Paris by Dr. Franklin and Count Von Krutz.

A similar treaty with Prussia was concluded in[Pg 215] 1785, not long before Dr. Franklin's departure from Europe.

A similar treaty with Prussia was concluded in[Pg 215] 1785, shortly before Dr. Franklin left Europe.

Dr. Franklin did not suffer his political pursuits to engross his whole attention. Some of his performances made their appearance in Paris. The objects of these were generally the promotion of industry and economy.

Dr. Franklin didn’t let his political pursuits take up all his attention. Some of his works appeared in Paris. The purpose of these was mainly to promote industry and economy.

In the year 1784, when animal magnetism made great noise in the world, particularly at Paris, it was thought a matter of such importance that the king appointed commissioners to examine into the foundation of this pretended science. Dr. Franklin was one of the number. After a fair and diligent examination, in the course of which Mesmer repeated a number of experiments, in the presence of the commissioners, some of which were tried upon themselves, they determined that it was a mere trick, intended to impose upon the ignorant and credulous. Mesmer was thus interrupted in his career to wealth and fame, and a most insolent attempt to impose upon the human understanding baffled.

In 1784, when animal magnetism gained a lot of attention, especially in Paris, it was considered so important that the king appointed a group of commissioners to investigate the basis of this so-called science. Dr. Franklin was one of them. After a thorough and careful examination, during which Mesmer conducted several experiments in front of the commissioners—some of which they tried on themselves—they concluded that it was just a trick meant to deceive the naive and gullible. This halted Mesmer's pursuit of wealth and fame, and a bold attempt to mislead people was thwarted.

The important ends of Dr. Franklin's mission being completed by the establishment of American independence, and the infirmities of age and disease coming upon him, he became desirous of returning to his native country. Upon application to Congress to be recalled, Mr. Jefferson was appointed to succeed him in 1785. Some time in September of the same year Dr. Franklin arrived in Philadelphia. He was shortly after chosen a member of the supreme executive council for the city, and soon after was elected president of the same.

The key goals of Dr. Franklin's mission were completed with the establishment of American independence, and as he faced the challenges of age and illness, he wanted to return to his home country. After requesting Congress to recall him, Mr. Jefferson was appointed to take over in 1785. In September of that same year, Dr. Franklin arrived in Philadelphia. Soon after, he was elected as a member of the city's supreme executive council and then quickly became its president.

When a convention was called to meet in Philadelphia, in 1787, for the purpose of giving more energy to the government of the union, by revising and amending the articles of confederation, Dr. Franklin was appointed a delegate from the State of Pennsylvania. He signed the constitution which[Pg 216] they proposed for the union, and gave it the most unequivocal marks of his approbation.

When a convention was organized to meet in Philadelphia in 1787 to strengthen the government of the union by revising and amending the Articles of Confederation, Dr. Franklin was appointed as a delegate from the State of Pennsylvania. He signed the constitution that[Pg 216] they proposed for the union and showed his full support for it.

A society for political inquiries, of which Dr. Franklin was president, was established about this period. The meetings were held at his house. Two or three essays read in this society were published. It did not long continue.

A society for political discussions, of which Dr. Franklin was president, was set up around this time. The meetings took place at his house. Two or three essays presented in this society were published. It didn’t last long.

In the year 1787, two societies were established in Philadelphia, founded on the principles of the most liberal and refined humanity: The Philadelphia Society for alleviating the miseries of public prisons: and the Pennsylvania Society for promoting the abolition of slavery, the relief of free negroes unlawfully held in bondage, and the improvement of the condition of the African race. Of each of these Dr. Franklin was president. The labours of these bodies have been crowned with great success; and they continue to prosecute, with unwearied diligence, the laudable designs for which they were established.

In 1787, two societies were founded in Philadelphia, based on the ideals of compassion and human dignity: The Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Misery of Public Prisons; and the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery, the Relief of Free Black People Unlawfully Held in Bondage, and the Improvement of the Conditions of the African Race. Dr. Franklin was president of both organizations. Their efforts have been met with significant success, and they continue to diligently pursue the worthy goals for which they were created.

Dr. Franklin's increasing infirmities prevented his regular attendance at the council chamber, and in 1788 he retired wholly from public life.

Dr. Franklin's growing health issues kept him from attending the council chamber regularly, and in 1788 he completely withdrew from public life.

His constitution had been a remarkably good one. He had been little subject to disease, except an attack of the gout occasionally, until about the year 1781, when he was first attacked with symptoms of the calculous complaint, which continued during his life. During the intervals of pain from this grievous disease, he spent many cheerful hours, conversing in the most agreeable and instructive manner. His faculties were entirely unimpaired, even to the hour of his death.

His health had always been excellent. He rarely got sick, except for an occasional bout of gout, until around 1781, when he first experienced symptoms of a kidney stone issue, which persisted for the rest of his life. During the pain from this serious condition, he still managed to enjoy many happy hours, engaging in great and enlightening conversations. His mental faculties remained sharp right up until the moment he passed away.

His name, as president of the abolition society, was signed to the memorial presented to the House of Representatives of the United States, on the 12th of February, 1789, praying them to exert the full extent of power vested in them by the constitution in discouraging the traffic in the human species. This was his last public act. In the debates to which[Pg 217] this memorial gave rise, several attempts were made to justify the trade. In the Federal Gazette of March 25, there appeared an essay, signed Historicus, written by Dr. Franklin, in which he communicated a speech, said to have been delivered in the Divan of Algiers, in 1687, in opposition to the prayer of the petition of a sect called Erika, or purists, for the abolition of piracy and slavery. This pretended African speech was an excellent parody of one delivered by Mr. Jackson, of Georgia. All the arguments urged in favour of negro slavery are applied with equal force to justify the plundering and enslaving of Europeans. It affords, at the same time, a demonstration of the futility of the arguments in defence of the slave-trade, and of the strength of mind and ingenuity of the author, at his advanced period of life. It furnished, too, a no less convincing proof of his power of imitating the style of other times and nations than his celebrated parable against persecution. And as the latter led many persons to search the scriptures with a view to find it, so the former caused many persons to search the bookstores and libraries for the work from which it was said to be extracted.

His name, as president of the abolition society, was signed to the memorial presented to the House of Representatives of the United States on February 12, 1789, asking them to fully use the power given to them by the constitution to discourage the trade in human beings. This was his last public act. In the debates sparked by this memorial, several attempts were made to justify the trade. In the Federal Gazette on March 25, there was an essay signed by Historicus, written by Dr. Franklin, in which he shared a speech that was supposedly given in the Divan of Algiers in 1687, opposing the petition from a group called Erika, or purists, for the abolition of piracy and slavery. This supposed African speech was a clever parody of one given by Mr. Jackson from Georgia. All the arguments made in favor of negro slavery were applied with equal force to justify the plundering and enslaving of Europeans. It also demonstrated the pointless nature of the arguments defending the slave trade, and showcased the intelligence and creativity of the author, even at his advanced age. It provided, too, convincing evidence of his ability to imitate the style of different times and cultures, similar to his famous parable against persecution. Just as the latter led many to search the scriptures looking for it, the former drove many to search bookstores and libraries for the work from which it was said to be taken.

During the greatest part of his life Dr. Franklin had enjoyed an almost uninterrupted state of good health, and this he entirely attributed to his exemplary temperance.

During most of his life, Dr. Franklin experienced nearly constant good health, and he credited this entirely to his strong self-discipline.

In the year 1735, indeed, he had been seized with a pleurisy, which ended in a suppuration of the left lobe of the lungs, so that he was almost suffocated by the quantity of matter thrown up. But from this, as well as from another attack of the same kind, he recovered so completely, that his breathing was not in the least affected.

In 1735, he was struck with pleurisy that led to an infection in the left lobe of his lungs, leaving him nearly suffocated by the amount of fluid he coughed up. However, from this, and after suffering another similar episode, he recovered so fully that his breathing was completely unaffected.

As he advanced in years, however, he became subject to fits of the gout, to which, in 1782, a nephritic cholic was superadded. From this time he was also affected with the stone as well as the gout; and for[Pg 218] the last twelve months of his life these complaints almost entirely confined him to his bed.

As he got older, he started experiencing gout attacks, and in 1782, he also began suffering from kidney stones. From that point on, he dealt with both the stones and the gout; for[Pg 218] the

Notwithstanding his distressed situation, neither his mental faculties nor his natural cheerfulness ever forsook him. His memory was tenacious to the very last; and he seemed to be an exception to the general rule, that, at a certain period of life, the organs which are subservient to this faculty become callous; a remarkable instance of which is, that he learned to speak French after he had attained the age of seventy!

Despite his troubled circumstances, his mental sharpness and natural positivity never left him. His memory stayed strong until the very end; he seemed to defy the common belief that, at a certain age, the parts of the brain responsible for memory become dull. A striking example of this is that he learned to speak French after turning seventy!

In the beginning of April following, he was attacked with a fever and complaint of his breast, which terminated his existence. The following account of his last illness was written by his friend and physician, Dr. Jones.

In early April of the following year, he came down with a fever and issues related to his chest, which led to his death. The account of his final illness was written by his friend and doctor, Dr. Jones.

"The stone, with which he had been afflicted for several years, had for the last twelve months confined him chiefly to his bed; and during the extreme painful paroxysms, he was obliged to take large doses of laudanum to mitigate his tortures; still, in the intervals of pain, he not only amused himself with reading and conversing cheerfully with his family, and a few friends who visited him, but was often employed in doing business of a public as well as private nature, with various persons who waited on him for that purpose; and in every instance displayed not only that readiness and disposition of doing good which was the distinguishing characteristic of his life, but the fullest and clearest possession of his uncommon mental abilities, and not unfrequently indulged himself in those jeux d'esprit and entertaining anecdotes which were the delight of all who heard him.

"The stone he had been suffering from for several years had kept him mostly in bed for the last twelve months. During the intense painful episodes, he had to take large amounts of laudanum to ease his suffering. However, in the breaks between the pain, he not only entertained himself by reading and having cheerful conversations with his family and a few friends who visited him, but he was also often busy handling both public and private matters with various people who came to see him for that purpose. In every case, he showed the same readiness and desire to do good that had always defined his life, as well as a clear display of his exceptional mental abilities, and he frequently enjoyed sharing witty remarks and entertaining stories that delighted all who listened to him."

"About sixteen days before his death, he was seized with a feverish indisposition, without any particular symptoms attending it, till the third or fourth day, when he complained of a pain in his left breast, which increased till it became extremely[Pg 219] acute, attended with a cough and labourious breathing. During this state, when the severity of his pain sometimes drew forth a groan of complaint, he would observe, that he was afraid he did not bear them as he ought, acknowledged his grateful sense of the many blessings he had received from that Supreme Being who had raised him from small and low beginnings to such high rank and consideration among men, and made no doubt but his present afflictions were kindly intended to wean him from a world in which he was no longer fit to act the part assigned him. In this frame of body and mind he continued till five days before his death, when his pain and difficulty of breathing entirely left him, and his family were flattering themselves with the hopes of his recovery, when an imposthumation, which had formed itself in his lungs, suddenly burst, and discharged a great quantity of matter, which he continued to throw up while he had sufficient strength to do it; but as that failed, the organs of respiration became gradually oppressed, a calm lethargic state succeeded, and, on the 17th of April, 1790, about eleven o'clock at night, he quietly expired, closing a long and useful life of eighty-four years and three months."[16]

"About sixteen days before his death, he came down with a fever, feeling unwell without any specific symptoms until the third or fourth day, when he started to feel sharp pain in his left breast, which got worse until it became extremely painful, accompanied by a cough and difficulty breathing. During this time, when the intensity of his pain sometimes made him groan, he would mention that he was worried he wasn't handling it as he should. He expressed his deep gratitude for the many blessings he had received from the Supreme Being who had lifted him from humble beginnings to such high status among people, and he was sure that his current sufferings were meant to help detach him from a world where he was no longer fit to fulfill his role. He remained in this state of body and mind until five days before his death, when his pain and breathing difficulties disappeared completely, leading his family to hope for his recovery, when an abscess that had formed in his lungs suddenly burst and released a large amount of fluid, which he continued to cough up as long as he had the strength. But as his strength faded, his breathing became increasingly labored, leading to a calm, lethargic state, and on April 17, 1790, around eleven o'clock at night, he peacefully passed away, closing a long and productive life of eighty-four years and three months."

The following account of his funeral, and the honours paid to his memory, is derived from an anonymous source, but is correct.

The following account of his funeral and the honors paid to his memory comes from an anonymous source, but it is accurate.

"All that was mortal of this great man was interred on the 21st of April, in the cemetery of Christ Church, Philadelphia, in that part adjoining to Arch-street, N. W. corner, in order that, if a monument[Pg 220] should be erected over his grave, it might be seen to more advantage.

"All that remained of this great man was buried on April 21st, in the cemetery of Christ Church, Philadelphia, in the area next to Arch Street, N.W. corner, so that if a monument[Pg 220] were placed over his grave, it would be more visible."

"Never was any funeral so numerously and so respectably attended in any part of the States of America. The concourse of people assembled upon this occasion was immense. All the bells in the city were muffled, and the very newspapers were published with black borders. The body was interred amid peals of artillery; and nothing was omitted that could display the veneration of the citizens for such an illustrious character.

"Never has any funeral been attended by so many people and with such respect in any part of the United States. The crowd gathered for this occasion was huge. All the bells in the city were silenced, and even the newspapers were printed with black borders. The body was buried with cannon fire; and nothing was left out that would show the citizens' admiration for such a remarkable person."

"The Congress ordered a general mourning for one month throughout America; the National Assembly of France paid the same compliment for three days; and the commons of Paris, as an extraordinary tribute of honour to his memory, assisted in a body at the funeral oration, delivered by the Abbé Fauchet, in the rotunda of the corn-market, which was hung with black, illuminated with chandeliers, and decorated with devices analogous to the occasion.

"The Congress declared a month of mourning across America; the National Assembly of France honored him with three days of mourning; and the people of Paris, as a special tribute to his memory, attended the funeral speech given by Abbé Fauchet in the corn-market rotunda, which was draped in black, lit with chandeliers, and adorned with decorations fitting for the occasion."

"Dr. Smith, provost of the college of Philadelphia, and David Rittenhouse, one of its members, were selected by the Philosophical Society to prepare a eulogium to the memory of its founder; and the subscribers to the City Library, who had just erected a handsome building for containing their books, left a vacant niche for a statue of their benefactor.

"Dr. Smith, provost of the College of Philadelphia, and David Rittenhouse, one of its members, were chosen by the Philosophical Society to write a tribute in honor of its founder; and the subscribers of the City Library, who had just built a beautiful new building to house their books, left an empty space for a statue of their benefactor."

"This has since been placed there by the munificence of an estimable citizen of Philadelphia. It was imported from Italy; the name of the artist is Francis Lazzarini; it is composed of Carara marble, and cost 500 guineas.

"This has since been placed there thanks to the generosity of a respected citizen of Philadelphia. It was imported from Italy; the artist's name is Francis Lazzarini; it's made of Carrara marble and cost 500 guineas."

"It was the first piece of sculpture of that size which had been seen in America. Franklin is represented in a standing posture; one arm is supported by means of some books, in his right hand he holds an inverted sceptre, an emblem of anti-monarchical[Pg 221] principles, and in his left a scroll of paper. He is dressed in a Roman toga. The resemblance is correct; the head is a copy from the excellent bust produced by the chisel of Houdon. The following inscription is engraven on the pedestal:

"It was the first sculpture of that size to be displayed in America. Franklin is shown standing, one arm resting on some books, while he holds an upside-down scepter in his right hand, symbolizing anti-monarchical principles, and a scroll in his left. He’s dressed in a Roman toga. The likeness is accurate; the head is based on the impressive bust created by Houdon. The pedestal is engraved with the following inscription:"

THIS STATUE

OF

DR. BENJAMIN FRANKLIN,

WAS PRESENTED BY

WILLIAM BINGHAM, Esq.,

1792.

THIS STATUE

OF

DR. BEN FRANKLIN,

WAS PRESENTED BY

WILLIAM BINGHAM, Esq.,

1792.

"Franklin's life," says the anonymous writer of the foregoing, "affords one of the finest moral lessons that can be offered up to the admiration, the applause, or the imitation of mankind.

"Franklin's life," says the anonymous writer of the above, "offers one of the greatest moral lessons that can be presented for the admiration, praise, or emulation of humanity.

"As a man, we have beheld him practising and inculcating the virtues of frugality, temperance, and industry.

"As a man, we have seen him practicing and teaching the virtues of being frugal, self-controlled, and hardworking."

"As a citizen, we have seen him repelling the efforts of tyranny, and ascertaining the liberty of his countrymen.

"As a citizen, we have witnessed him fighting against tyranny and securing the freedom of his fellow countrymen."

"As a legislator, he affords a bright example of a genius soaring above corruption, and continually aiming at the happiness of his constituents.

"As a lawmaker, he stands out as a shining example of someone rising above corruption and constantly striving for the happiness of his constituents."

"As a politician, we survey him, on one hand, acquiring the aid of a powerful nation, by means of his skilful negotiations; and on the other, calling forth the common strength of a congress of republics, by fixing a central point to which they could all look up, and concentrating their common force for the purposes of union, harmony, legislation, and defence.

"As a politician, we see him, on one hand, gaining the support of a strong nation through his skilled negotiations; and on the other, rallying the collective strength of a congress of republics by establishing a central focus for them to unite around, channeling their shared power for the goals of unity, cooperation, legislation, and defense."

"As a philosopher, his labours and his discoveries are calculated to advance the interests of humanity:[Pg 222] he might, indeed, have been justly termed the friend of man, the benefactor of the universe!

"As a philosopher, his work and discoveries are meant to benefit humanity:[Pg 222] he truly could be called the friend of man, the benefactor of the universe!"

"The pursuits and occupations of his early youth afford a most excellent and instructive example to the young; his middle life, to the adult; his advanced years, to the aged. From him the poor may learn to acquire wealth, and the rich to adapt it to the purposes of beneficence.

"The activities and jobs of his early youth provide a great and helpful example for the young; his middle life, for adults; and his later years, for the elderly. The poor can learn from him how to gain wealth, while the rich can learn to use it for charitable purposes."

"In regard to his character, he was rather sententious than fluent; more disposed to listen than to talk; a judicious rather than an imposing companion. He was what, perhaps, every able man is, impatient of interruption; for he used to mention the custom of the Indians with great applause, who, after listening with a profound attention to the observations of each other, preserve a respectful silence for some minutes before they begin their own reply.

"In terms of his personality, he was more concise than talkative; more likely to listen than to speak; a thoughtful rather than a dominant companion. He was, like many capable people, impatient with interruptions; he often praised the tradition of the Indians, who, after listening attentively to each other, maintain a respectful silence for a few moments before starting their own responses."

"He was polite in his manners, and never gave a pointed contradiction to the assertions of his friends or his antagonists, but treated every argument with great calmness, and conquered his adversaries rather by the force of reason than assertion."

"He was polite in his manners and never directly contradicted the claims of his friends or his opponents, but handled every argument with great calmness, and overcame his adversaries more through the force of reason than through assertion."

The advice of his death reached France at a period well adapted to excite great emotions; and in the National Assembly, 11th June, 1790, Mr. Mirabeau the elder addressed the assembly as follows:

The news of his death reached France at a time that was sure to stir strong emotions; and in the National Assembly, on June 11, 1790, Mr. Mirabeau the elder addressed the assembly as follows:

"Franklin is dead!"

"Franklin is dead!"

[A profound silence reigned throughout the hall.]

[There was a profound silence in the hall.]

"The genius which gave freedom to America and scattered torrents of light upon Europe, is returned to the bosom of the Divinity!

"The genius who brought freedom to America and inspired Europe has returned to the embrace of the Divine!"

"The sage whom two worlds claim; the man, disputed by the history of the sciences and the history of empires, holds, most undoubtedly, an elevated rank among the human species.

"The wise individual claimed by two worlds; a person debated in the realms of science and the history of empires, undeniably holds a high place in humanity."

"Political cabinets have but too long notified the death of those who were never great but in their funeral[Pg 223] orations; the etiquette of courts has but too long sanctioned hypocritical grief. Nations ought only to mourn for their benefactors; the representatives of free men ought never to recommend any other than the heroes of humanity to their homage.

"Political leaders have too often declared the deaths of those who were never truly significant except in eulogies; the customs of courts have long allowed for insincere mourning. Nations should only mourn their true benefactors; representatives of free people should only honor the heroes of humanity."

"The Congress hath ordered a general mourning for one month throughout the fourteen confederated states, on account of the death of Franklin; and America hath thus acquitted her tribute of admiration in behalf of one of the fathers of her constitution.

"Congress has declared a month of mourning across the fourteen united states for Franklin’s death; and America has shown her respect and admiration for one of the founding fathers of her constitution."

"Would it not be worthy of you, fellow-legislators, to unite yourselves in this religious act, to participate in this homage rendered in the face of the universe to the rights of man, and to the philosopher who has so eminently propagated the conquest of them throughout the world?

"Would it not be appropriate for you, fellow legislators, to unite in this act of devotion, to participate in this tribute to the rights of humanity, and to the philosopher who has significantly advanced them worldwide?"

"Antiquity would have elevated altars to that mortal who, for the advantage of the human race, embracing both heaven and earth in his vast and extensive mind, knew how to subdue thunder and tyranny!

"In ancient times, altars would have been constructed for someone who, for humanity's benefit, embraced both heaven and earth in their expansive mind, knowing how to overcome thunder and oppression!"

"Enlightened and free, Europe at least owes its remembrance and its regret to one of the greatest men who has ever served the cause of philosophy and of liberty.

"Enlightened and free, Europe at least owes its remembrance and regret to one of the greatest individuals who ever contributed to the causes of philosophy and liberty."

"I propose that a decree do now pass, enacting that the National Assembly shall wear mourning during three days for Benjamin Franklin."

"I propose that a decree be enacted, stating that the National Assembly will observe three days of mourning for Benjamin Franklin."

MM. de la Rochefoucault and Lafayette immediately rose in order to second this motion.

MM. de la Rochefoucault and Lafayette immediately stood up to support this motion.

The assembly adopted it, at first by acclamation; and afterward decreed, by a large majority, amid the plaudits of all the spectators, that on Monday 14th of June, it should go into mourning for three days; that the discourse of M. Mirabeau should be printed; and that the president should write a letter[Pg 224] of condolence upon the occasion to the Congress of America.[17]

The assembly first adopted it by a show of hands, and then voted, by a large majority and to the applause of everyone present, that on Monday, June 14th, they would go into mourning for three days; that M. Mirabeau's speech would be printed; and that the president would write a letter[Pg 224] of condolence to the Congress of America on this occasion.[17]

The following character of Dr. Franklin, by one of his intimate friends, is so ably and accurately drawn, that we cannot refrain adding it to the foregoing.

The following description of Dr. Franklin, by one of his close friends, is so skillfully and accurately written that we can't help but add it to the previous section.

"There is in the character of every distinguished person something to admire and something to imitate. The incidents that have marked the life of a great man always excite curiosity and often afford improvement. If there be talents which we can never expect to equal, if there be a series of good fortune which we can never expect to enjoy, we still need not lose the labour of our biographical inquiries. We may probably become acquainted with habits which it may be prudent to adopt, and discover virtues which we cannot fail to applaud. It will be easy for the reader to make a full application of these remarks in his contemplations upon the late celebrated Dr. Franklin. By his death one of the best lights of the world may be said to be extinguished. I shall not attempt any historical details of the life of this illustrious patriot and philosopher,[Pg 225] as I have nothing farther in view than to make a few comments upon the most striking traits of his character.

There’s something admirable and worth imitating in every distinguished person. The events that have shaped a great man's life always spark curiosity and often offer lessons for us. Even if there are talents we'll never match or a level of good fortune we can’t hope to experience, we shouldn’t disregard the effort we put into studying their lives. We might learn habits that are wise to adopt and uncover virtues that we can't help but appreciate. It should be easy for the reader to fully apply these thoughts when reflecting on the recently celebrated Dr. Franklin. With his passing, one of the brightest lights in the world has gone out. I won’t delve into the historical details of this remarkable patriot and philosopher,[Pg 225] as I only intend to share a few observations about the most notable aspects of his character.

"Original genius was peculiarly his attribute. The native faculties of his mind qualified him to penetrate into every science: and his unremitted diligence left no field of knowledge unexplored. There were no limits to his curiosity. His inquiries were spread over the whole face of nature. But the study of man seemed to be his highest delight: and if his genius had any special bias, it lay in discovering those things that made men wiser and happier. As truth was the sole object of his researches, he was, of course, no sectary: and as reason was his guide, he embraced no system which that did not authorize. In short, he laid the whole volume of nature open before him, and diligently and faithfully perused it.

"Original genius was uniquely his quality. His natural abilities allowed him to dive into every science, and his relentless diligence ensured that no area of knowledge was left unexplored. There were no limits to his curiosity. His inquiries covered the entire spectrum of nature. However, studying humanity seemed to be his greatest joy, and if his genius had a particular focus, it was in discovering what made people wiser and happier. Since truth was the only goal of his research, he wasn’t tied to any specific sect, and guided by reason, he accepted no system that wasn’t supported by it. In short, he opened up the entire volume of nature before him and studied it diligently and faithfully."

"Nor were his political attainments less conspicuous than his philosophical. The ancients usually ranked good fortune among those circumstances of life which indicate merit. In this view Dr. Franklin is almost unrivalled, having seldom undertaken more than he accomplished. The world are too well acquainted with the events of his political career to require, at this time, a particular enumeration of them. It may be presumed the historians of the American revolution will exhibit them in proper colours.

"His political achievements were just as notable as his philosophical ones. The ancients often viewed good fortune as a sign of merit in life. From this perspective, Dr. Franklin cannot be matched, as he rarely took on more than he accomplished. People are already familiar with the events of his political career, so there's no need to list them all right now. It's likely that historians of the American Revolution will present them in the right light."

"If Dr. Franklin did not aspire after the splendour of eloquence, it was only because the demonstrative plainness of his manner was superior to it. Though he neither loved political debate nor excelled in it, he still preserved much influence in public assemblies, and discovered an aptitude in his remarks on all occasions. He was not fond of taking a leading part in such investigations as could never terminate in any degree of certainty. To come forward in questions which, in their nature, are indefinite, and[Pg 226] in their issue problematical, does not comport with the caution of a man who has taught himself to look, for demonstration. He reserved his observations for those cases which science could enlighten and common sense approve. The simplicity of his style was well adapted to the clearness of his understanding. His conceptions were so bright and perfect, that he did not choose to involve them in a cloud of expressions. If he used metaphors, it was to illustrate, and not to embellish the truth. A man possessing such a lively imagery of ideas should never affect the arts of a vain rhetorician, whose excellence consists only in a beautiful arrangement of words.

"If Dr. Franklin didn't aim for the glory of eloquence, it was only because his straightforward manner surpassed it. Although he wasn't fond of political debate and didn't stand out in it, he still held significant influence in public gatherings and showed a knack for making relevant remarks on various occasions. He wasn't keen on taking the lead in discussions that could never reach any conclusive certainty. Engaging in questions that are inherently vague and have uncertain outcomes doesn't align with the prudence of someone who has learned to seek proof. He reserved his comments for situations that science could clarify and common sense would support. The simplicity of his style matched the clarity of his thinking. His ideas were so sharp and complete that he preferred not to complicate them with flowery language. When he used metaphors, it was to clarify, not to embellish the truth. A person with such vivid ideas should never adopt the tactics of a superficial rhetorician, whose skill lies only in the beautiful arrangement of words."

"But whatever claims to eminence Dr. Franklin may have as a politician or a scholar, there is no point of light in which his character shines with more lustre than when we view him as a man or a citizen. He was eminently great in common things. Perhaps no man ever existed whose life can, with more justice, be denominated useful. Nothing ever passed through his hands without receiving improvement, and no person ever went into his company without gaining wisdom. His sagacity was so sharp and his science so various, that, whatever might be the profession or occupation of those with whom he conversed, he could meet every one upon his own ground. He could enliven every conversation with an anecdote, and conclude it with a moral.

"But whatever claims to greatness Dr. Franklin may have as a politician or a scholar, there's no aspect of his character that shines more brightly than when we see him as a person or a citizen. He was exceptionally remarkable in everyday matters. Perhaps no one has ever lived whose life can be more rightfully called useful. Nothing ever passed through his hands without being improved, and no one ever spent time with him without gaining wisdom. His insight was so sharp and his knowledge so diverse that, regardless of the profession or occupation of those he talked to, he could connect with anyone on their own terms. He could brighten any conversation with a story and wrap it up with a lesson."

"The whole tenour of his life was a perpetual lecture against the idle, the extravagant, and the proud. It was his principal aim to inspire mankind with a love of industry, temperance, and frugality, and to inculcate such duties as promote the important interests of humanity. He never wasted a moment of time, or lavished a farthing of money in folly or dissipation. Such expenses as the dignity of his station required he readily sustained, limiting[Pg 227] them by the strictest rules of propriety. Many public institutions experienced his well-timed liberality, and he manifested a sensibility of heart by numerous acts of private charity.

"The overall focus of his life was a constant lesson against idleness, extravagance, and pride. His main goal was to inspire people to value hard work, moderation, and frugality, and to teach duties that support the essential interests of humanity. He never wasted a moment or spent a penny on foolishness or indulgence. He readily covered expenses that matched his station, but he kept them within the strictest limits of propriety. Many public institutions benefited from his timely generosity, and he showed his compassion through numerous acts of private charity."

"By a judicious division of time, Dr. Franklin acquired the art of doing everything to advantage, and his amusements were of such a nature as could never militate with the main objects of his pursuit. In whatever situation he was placed by chance or design, he extracted something useful for himself or others. His life was remarkably full of incident. Every circumstance of it turned to some valuable account. The maxims which his discerning mind has formed apply to innumerable cases and characters. Those who move in the lowest, equally with those who move in the most elevated rank in society, may be guided by his instructions. In the private deportment of his life, he in many respects has furnished a most excellent model. His manners were easy and accommodating, and his address winning and respectful. All who knew him speak of him as a most agreeable man, and all who have heard of him applaud him as a very useful one. A man so wise and so amiable could not but have many admirers and many friends."

"By managing his time wisely, Dr. Franklin mastered the skill of making everything work to his advantage, and his hobbies were always aligned with his main goals. No matter the situation he found himself in, whether by chance or design, he was able to gain something useful for himself or others. His life was full of interesting events. Every aspect of it contributed to something valuable. The principles he developed apply to countless situations and people. Those at the lowest levels of society, just as much as those in the highest, can benefit from his guidance. In his private life, he set an excellent example in many ways. His manner was relaxed and accommodating, and he had a charming and respectful way of speaking. Everyone who knew him describes him as a very pleasant person, and those who have heard of him praise him as someone incredibly helpful. A person as wise and kind as he was naturally attracted many admirers and friends."


The following are extracts from the will and codicil of Dr. Franklin:

The following are excerpts from the will and codicil of Dr. Franklin:


"With regard to my books, those I had in France and those I left in Philadelphia being now assembled together here, and a catalogue made of them, it is my intention to dispose of the same as follows: My 'History of the Academy of Sciences,' in sixty or seventy volumes quarto, I give to the Philosophical Society of Philadelphia, of which I have the honour to be president. My collection in folio, of 'Les Arts et les Metiers' [Arts and Trade], I give to the American Philosophical Society, established[Pg 228] in New-England, of which I am a member. My quarto edition of the same, 'Arts et Metiers', I give to the Library Company of Philadelphia. Such and so many of my books as I shall mark on the said catalogue with the name of my grandson Benjamin Franklin Bache, I do hereby give to him: and such and so many of my books as I shall mark on the said catalogue with the name of my grandson William Bache, I do hereby give to him: and such as shall be marked with the name of Jonathan Williams, I hereby give to my cousin of that name. The residue and remainder of all my books, manuscripts, and papers, I do give to my grandson William Temple Franklin. My share in the Library Company of Philadelphia I give to my grandson Benjamin Franklin Bache, confiding that he will permit his brothers and sisters to share in the use of it.

"Regarding my books, which I’ve gathered from France and those I left in Philadelphia, I have compiled a list of them and plan to distribute them as follows: I give my 'History of the Academy of Sciences,' in sixty or seventy quarto volumes, to the Philosophical Society of Philadelphia, where I have the honor of serving as president. My folio collection, 'Les Arts et les Metiers' [Arts and Trade], goes to the American Philosophical Society, established[Pg 228] in New England, of which I'm a member. I will donate my quarto edition of 'Arts et Metiers' to the Library Company of Philadelphia. I will give any of my books marked in the catalogue with the name of my grandson Benjamin Franklin Bache to him; likewise, any books marked with the name of my grandson William Bache will go to him; and any books marked with the name Jonathan Williams will be given to my cousin of the same name. The remaining books, manuscripts, and papers will be given to my grandson William Temple Franklin. I also give my share in the Library Company of Philadelphia to my grandson Benjamin Franklin Bache, trusting that he will allow his brothers and sisters to share in its use."

"I was born in Boston, New-England, and owe my first instructions in literature to the free grammar-schools established there. I therefore give one hundred pounds sterling to my executors, to be by them, the survivers or surviver of them, paid over to the managers or directors of the freeschools in my native town of Boston, to be by them, or those persons or person who shall have the superintendance and management of the said schools, put out to interest, and so continued at interest for ever; which interest annually shall be laid out in silver medals, and given as honorary rewards annually by the directors of the said freeschools, for the encouragement of scholarship in the said schools, belonging to the said town, in such manner as to the discretion of the selectmen of the said town shall seem meet. Out of the salary that may remain due to me as president of the state, I do give the sum of two thousand pounds to my executors, to be by them, the survivers or surviver of them, paid over to such person or persons as the legislature of this state, by an act of Assembly, shall appoint to receive[Pg 229] the same, in trust, to be employed for making the Schuylkill navigable.

"I was born in Boston, New England, and I owe my first lessons in literature to the free grammar schools that were established there. Therefore, I bequeath one hundred pounds sterling to my executors, to be paid by them, the survivors or surviving member, to the managers or directors of the free schools in my hometown of Boston. This money should be invested by them or by those in charge of these schools, and the interest from this investment should be used indefinitely; that interest each year will be spent on silver medals, which will be given as honorary awards every year by the directors of these free schools to encourage scholarship in the schools of the town, in a way that the selectmen of the town find appropriate. From my remaining salary as president of the state, I bequeath the sum of two thousand pounds to my executors, to be paid by them, the survivors or surviving member, to the person or persons designated by the legislature of this state, by an act of Assembly, to receive the same, in trust, to be used for making the Schuylkill navigable."


"During the number of years I was in business as a stationer, printer, and postmaster, a great many small sums became due to me, for books, advertisements, postage of letters, and other matters, which were not collected, when, in 1757, I was sent by the Assembly to England as their agent, and by subsequent appointments continued there till 1775; when, on my return, I was immediately engaged in the affairs of Congress, and sent to France in 1776, where I remained nine years, not returning till 1785; and the said debts not being demanded in such a length of time, have become in a manner obsolete, yet are nevertheless justly due. These, as they are stated in my great folio leger E, I bequeath to the contributors of the Pennsylvania Hospital, hoping that those debtors, and the descendants of such as are deceased, who now, as I find, make some difficulty of satisfying such antiquated demands as just debts, may, however, be induced to pay or give them as charity to that excellent institution. I am sensible that much must inevitably be lost, but I hope something considerable may be received. It is possible, too, that some of the parties charged may have existing old unsettled accounts against me: in which case the managers of the said hospital will allow and deduct the amount, or pay the balances, if they find it against me.

"During the years I worked as a stationer, printer, and postmaster, I was owed many small amounts for books, advertisements, postage, and other things that were never collected. In 1757, I was sent by the Assembly to England as their agent and continued in that role until 1775. When I returned, I immediately got involved in Congress and was sent to France in 1776, where I stayed for nine years, not coming back until 1785. Because I didn’t demand these debts for such a long time, they have become somewhat outdated, but they are still justly owed. I am including these debts, as recorded in my large ledger E, in my will for the contributors of the Pennsylvania Hospital, hoping that the debtors, along with the descendants of those who have passed away, who I’ve found are resistant to settling these old debts, might still be encouraged to pay or donate them as charity to this excellent institution. I know that a lot might inevitably be lost, but I hope a significant amount can still be collected. It’s also possible that some of the people charged may have old, unresolved accounts with me; in that case, the hospital's management will allow for adjustments or pay any balances if they find I owe money."


"I request my friends, Henry Hill, Esq., John Jay, Esq., Francis Hopkinson, Esq., and Mr. Edward Duffield, of Benfield, in Philadelphia county, to be the executors of this my last will and testament, and I hereby nominate and appoint them for that purpose.

"I ask my friends, Henry Hill, Esq., John Jay, Esq., Francis Hopkinson, Esq., and Mr. Edward Duffield, of Benfield, in Philadelphia county, to be the executors of my last will and testament, and I officially nominate and appoint them for this role."

"I would have my body buried with as little expense or ceremony as may be.

"I want my body to be buried with as little cost or ceremony as possible."


"Philadelphia, July 17, 1788."

"Philadelphia, July 17, 1788."

CODICIL.

Addendum.

"I, Benjamin Franklin, in the foregoing or annexed last will and testament named, having farther considered the same, do think proper to make and publish the following codicil or addition thereto:

"I, Ben Franklin, after reviewing the last will and testament mentioned above, believe it is necessary to create and publish the following codicil or addition to it:"

"It having long been a fixed political opinion of mine, that in a democratical state there ought to be no offices of profit, for the reasons I had given in an article of my drawing in our constitution, it was my intention, when I accepted the office of president, to devote the appointed salary to some public uses: accordingly, I had, before I made my will in July last, given large sums of it to colleges, schools, building of churches, &c.; and in that will I bequeathed two thousand pounds more to the state, for the purpose of making the Schuylkill navigable; but understanding since that such a sum will do but little towards accomplishing such a work, and that the project is not likely to be undertaken for many years to come; and having entertained another idea, that I hope may be more extensively useful, I do hereby revoke and annul that bequest, and direct that the certificates I have for what remains due to me of that salary be sold towards raising the sum of two thousand pounds sterling, to be disposed of as I am now about to order.

"It has long been my firm political belief that in a democratic state, there shouldn’t be any profit-making offices. For the reasons I outlined in an article regarding our constitution, my intention when I accepted the presidency was to dedicate the salary to public purposes. Accordingly, before creating my will last July, I donated a significant portion of it to colleges, schools, churches, etc. In that will, I bequeathed an additional two thousand pounds to the state to help make the Schuylkill navigable. However, I have since learned that such an amount will do little to achieve that goal and that the project is unlikely to start for many years. Having considered another idea that I hope will be more beneficial, I hereby revoke that bequest and direct that the certificates I hold for the remaining amount of that salary be sold to raise the sum of two thousand pounds sterling, which will be allocated as I am about to specify."

"It has been an opinion, that he who receives an estate from his ancestors is under some kind of obligation to transmit the same to his posterity. This obligation does not lie on me, who never inherited a shilling from any ancestor or relation. I shall, however, if it is not diminished by some accident before my death, leave a considerable estate among my descendants and relations. The above observation is made merely as some apology to my family[Pg 231] for my making bequests that do not appear to have any immediate relation to their advantage.

"It’s been said that someone who inherits property from their ancestors has a duty to pass it on to their descendants. I don’t have that obligation since I never received a single penny from any ancestor or relative. However, if nothing changes before I die, I plan to leave a significant estate to my descendants and relatives. I mention this just to offer some explanation to my family[Pg 231] for my donations that might not seem directly beneficial to them."

"I was born in Boston, New-England, and owe my first instructions in literature to the free grammar-schools established there. I have, therefore, already considered those schools in my will. But I am also under obligations to the state of Massachusetts for having, unasked, appointed me formerly their agent in England, with a handsome salary, which continued some years; and although I accidentally lost in their service, by transmitting Governor Hutchinson's letters, much more than the amount of what they gave me, I do not think that ought in the least to diminish my gratitude. I have considered that among artisans, good apprentices are most likely to make good citizens; and having myself been bred to a manual art, printing, in my native town, and afterward assisted to set up my business in Philadelphia by kind loans of money from two friends there, which was the foundation of my fortune, and of all the utility in life that may be ascribed to me, I wish to be useful, even after my death, if possible, in forming and advancing other young men, that may be serviceable to their country in both these towns. To this end I devote two thousand pounds sterling, which I give, one thousand thereof to the inhabitants of the town of Boston, in Massachusetts, and the other thousand to the inhabitants of the city of Philadelphia, in trust, to and for the uses, intents, and purposes herein after mentioned and declared. The said sum of one thousand pounds sterling, if accepted by the inhabitants of the town of Boston, shall be managed under the direction of the selectmen, united with the ministers of the oldest Episcopalian, Congregational, and Presbyterian churches in that town, who are to let out the same upon interest at five per cent. per annum, to such young married artificers, under the age of twenty-five[Pg 232] years, as have served an apprenticeship in the said town, and faithfully fulfilled the duties required in their indentures, so as to obtain a good moral character from at least two respectable citizens, who are willing to become their sureties in a bond, with the applicants, for the repayment of the money so lent, with interest, according to the terms hereinafter prescribed; all which bonds are to be taken for Spanish milled dollars, or the value thereof in current gold coin: and the managers shall keep a bound book or books, wherein shall be entered the names of those who shall apply for and receive the benefit of this institution, and of their sureties, together with the sums lent, the dates, and other necessary and proper records respecting the business and concerns of this institution: and as these loans are intended to assist young married artificers in setting up their business, they are to be proportioned by the discretion of the managers, so as not to exceed sixty pounds sterling to one person, nor to be less than fifteen pounds. And if the number of appliers so entitled should be so large as that the sum will not suffice to afford to each as much as might otherwise not be improper, the proportion to each shall be diminished, so as to afford every one some assistance. These aids may, therefore, be small at first; but as the capital increases by the accumulated interest, they will be more ample. And in order to serve as many as possible in their turn, as well as to make the repayment of the principal borrowed more easy, each borrower shall be obliged to pay, with the yearly interest, one tenth part of the principal; which sums of principal and interest so paid in shall be again let out to fresh borrowers. And as it is presumed that there will always be found in Boston virtuous and benevolent citizens willing to bestow a part of their time in doing good to the rising generation, by superintending and managing this institution gratis, it is hoped[Pg 233] that no part of the money will at any time be dead or diverted to other purposes, but be continually augmenting by the interest, in which case there may, in time, be more than the occasion in Boston shall require: and then some may be spared to the neighbouring or other towns in the said state of Massachusetts, which may desire to have it, such towns engaging to pay punctually the interest, and the proportions of the principal annually to the inhabitants of the town of Boston. If this plan is executed, and succeeds, as is projected, without interruption for one hundred years, the sum will then be one hundred and thirty-one thousand pounds, of which I would have the managers of the donation to the town of Boston then lay out, at their discretion, one hundred thousand pounds in public works, which may be judged of most general utility to the inhabitants, such as fortifications, bridges, aqueducts, public buildings, baths, pavements, or whatever may make living in the town more convenient to its people, and render it more agreeable to strangers resorting thither for health or a temporary residence. The remaining thirty-one thousand pounds I would have continued to be let out on interest, in the manner above directed, for another hundred years; as I hope it will have been found that the institution has had a good effect on the conduct of youth, and been of service to many worthy characters and useful citizens. At the end of this second term, if no unfortunate accident has prevented the operation, the sum will be four millions and sixty-one thousand pounds sterling, of which I leave one million and sixty-one thousand pounds to the disposition and management of the inhabitants of the town of Boston, and three millions to the disposition of the government of the state, not presuming to carry my views farther.

I was born in Boston, New England, and got my first lessons in literature from the free grammar schools established there. I've already included those schools in my will. However, I'm also grateful to the state of Massachusetts for having, without my asking, appointed me as their agent in England, with a nice salary that lasted for several years. Although I ended up losing much more than what they paid me by sending Governor Hutchinson's letters, I don’t think that should lessen my gratitude. I believe that among workers, good apprentices are likely to become good citizens; and having trained in the manual trade of printing in my hometown, and later received help to start my business in Philadelphia through kind loans from two friends there—which laid the foundation of my fortune and the usefulness I’ve had in life—I want to continue to be useful, even after my death, by helping other young men who can serve their country in both towns. To that end, I’m dedicating two thousand pounds sterling, giving one thousand to the residents of Boston, Massachusetts, and the other thousand to the residents of Philadelphia, in trust, for the specified uses, intentions, and purposes outlined here. The one thousand pounds sterling, if accepted by the residents of Boston, will be managed by the selectmen along with the ministers of the oldest Episcopalian, Congregational, and Presbyterian churches in the town, who will lend it at an interest rate of five percent per year to young married tradesmen under the age of twenty-five who have completed an apprenticeship in that town and have a good moral character verified by at least two respectable citizens willing to back them in a bond for the repayment of the loan, with interest, under the terms that follow; all bonds will be taken for Spanish milled dollars, or their equivalent in current gold coin. The managers will keep a bound book or books to record the names of those who apply for and receive the benefits of this institution, along with their guarantors, the amounts loaned, dates, and other necessary records related to the institution's business. These loans, aimed at helping young married tradesmen establish their businesses, will be determined by the managers’ discretion, not exceeding sixty pounds sterling to any one person and not less than fifteen pounds. If there are more applicants than funds available to provide reasonable amounts to each, the individual amounts will be reduced so that everyone receives some assistance. Initially, these aids may be small, but as the capital grows through accumulated interest, they will become more substantial. To serve as many as possible, as well as to ease the repayment of the Principal Amount borrowed, each borrower will be required to pay back one-tenth of the principal along with the yearly interest; these payments will then be lent to new borrowers. It is expected that there will always be virtuous citizens in Boston willing to invest their time in benefitting the younger generation by overseeing and managing this institution without charge, so no part of the funds should ever be idle or misused, but instead continually grow with interest. If successful, there may eventually be more than enough to meet the need in Boston, allowing some to be allocated to neighboring towns in Massachusetts that desire it, with those towns agreeing to promptly pay the interest and portions of the principal back to the residents of Boston. If this plan is carried out and runs smoothly for a hundred years, the total amount will reach one hundred thirty-one thousand pounds, of which I would want the managers to invest one hundred thousand pounds in public works deemed most beneficial for the residents, such as fortifications, bridges, aqueducts, public buildings, baths, pavements, or anything else that would make living in the town easier and more enjoyable for its people and attract visitors seeking health or temporary stays. The remaining thirty-one thousand pounds should continue to be lent at interest according to the instructions given, for another hundred years; I hope that it will have positively impacted the behavior of youth and benefited many worthy individuals and citizens. At the end of this second term, if everything has gone smoothly without any unfortunate setbacks, the total should be four million sixty-one thousand pounds sterling, of which I will leave one million sixty-one thousand pounds for the management of the residents of Boston, and three million for the state government, with no further plans from me.

"All the directions herein given respecting the disposition and management of the donation to the inhabitants[Pg 234] of Boston, I would have observed respecting that to the inhabitants of Philadelphia; only, as Philadelphia is incorporated, I request the corporation of that city to undertake the management agreeably to the said directions, and I do hereby vest them with full and ample powers for that purpose. And having considered that the covering its ground-plat with buildings and pavements, which carry off most of the rain, and prevent its soaking into the earth, and renewing and purifying the springs, whence the water of the wells must gradually grow worse, and, in time, be unfit for use, as I find has happened in all old cities, I recommend that, at the end of the first hundred years, if not done before, the corporation of the city employ a part of the hundred thousand pounds in bringing by pipes the water of Wissahiccon Creek into the town, so as to supply the inhabitants, which I apprehend may be done without great difficulty, the level of that creek being much above that of the city, and may be made higher by a dam. I also recommend making the Schuylkill completely navigable. At the end of the second hundred years, I would have the disposition of the four millions and sixty-one thousand pounds divided between the inhabitants of the city of Philadelphia and the government of Pennsylvania, in the same manner as herein directed with respect to that of the inhabitants of Boston and the government of Massachusetts. It is my desire that this institution should take place and begin to operate within one year after my decease; for which purpose due notice should be publicly given previous to the expiration of that year, that those for whose benefit this establishment is intended may make their respective applications; and I hereby direct my executor, the survivers or surviver of them, within six months after my decease, to pay over the said sum of two thousand pounds sterling to such persons as shall be duly appointed[Pg 235] by the selectmen of Boston and the corporation of Philadelphia to receive and take charge of their respective sums of one thousand pounds each for the purposes aforesaid. Considering the accidents to which all human affairs and projects are subject in such a length of time, I have, perhaps, too much flattered myself with a vain fancy that these dispositions, if carried into execution, will be continued without interruption, and have the effects proposed; I hope, however, that if the inhabitants of the two cities should not think fit to undertake the execution, they will at least accept the offer of these donations as a mark of my good-will, a token of my gratitude, and a testimony of my earnest desire to be useful to them even after my departure. I wish, indeed, that they may both undertake to endeavour the execution of the project, because I think that, though unforeseen difficulties may arise, expedients will be found to remove them, and the scheme be found practicable. If one of them accepts the money with the conditions and the other refuses, my will then is that both sums be given to the inhabitants of the city accepting, the whole to be applied to the same purpose and under the same regulations directed for the separate parts; and if both refuse, the money remains, of course, in the mass of my estate, and it is to be disposed of therewith, according to my will made the seventeenth day of July, 1788. I wish to be buried by the side of my wife, if it may be, and that a marble stone, to be made by Chambers, six feet long, four feet wide, plain, with only a small moulding round the upper edge, and this inscription,

"All the guidelines provided here about the distribution and management of the donation to the residents of Boston[Pg 234] would also apply to the residents of Philadelphia; however, since Philadelphia is an incorporated city, I ask the city’s corporation to manage it according to these guidelines, and I hereby give them full authority for that purpose. Considering that covering the ground with buildings and pavements diverts most of the rainwater, preventing it from soaking into the earth and replenishing the springs, which eventually makes well water worse and, over time, unusable—as has happened in all old cities—I recommend that at the end of the first hundred years, if it hasn’t been done already, the city corporation use part of the one hundred thousand pounds to bring the water from Wissahiccon Creek into the town via pipes, ensuring a supply for the residents. I believe this can be achieved without much difficulty, as the creek is much higher than the city and could be made even higher with a dam. I also recommend that the Schuylkill be made fully navigable. After the second hundred years, I want the distribution of four million sixty-one thousand pounds to be divided between the residents of Philadelphia and the government of Pennsylvania, following the same method as outlined here for the residents of Boston and the government of Massachusetts. I wish for this institution to be established and begin functioning within one year after my death; to this end, proper notice should be given publicly before the year ends, so those who will benefit from this establishment can submit their applications. I instruct my executor, the survivors or survivor among them, to pay the sum of two thousand pounds sterling within six months after my death to the individuals duly appointed[Pg 235] by the selectmen of Boston and the corporation of Philadelphia to receive and manage their respective amounts of one thousand pounds each for the specified purposes. Considering the uncertainties of human affairs and plans over such an extended period, I might have overly hoped that these arrangements, if executed, would be carried out without interruption and achieve the intended results; however, I hope that if the residents of the two cities choose not to implement them, they will at least accept these donations as a gesture of my goodwill, a sign of my gratitude, and a testament to my sincere desire to be of service to them even after I’m gone. I truly hope that both cities will strive to implement this project, as I believe that although unexpected challenges may arise, solutions will emerge, and the plan will prove feasible. If one city accepts the funds under the conditions while the other declines, my wish is that both amounts be given to the accepting city, to be used for the same purpose and under the same rules specified for the separate funds; if both decline, the money will remain in my estate and be distributed according to my will made on July 17, 1788. I hope to be buried next to my wife, if possible, with a marble stone designed by Chambers, six feet long, four feet wide, plain with just a small molding around the upper edge, and this inscription,

Benjamin
and
Deborah

Benjamin and Deborah

} Franklin,
178-, be placed over us both.

"My fine crabtree walking-stick, with a gold head, curiously wrought in the form of the Cap of Liberty,[Pg 236] I give to my friend and the friend of mankind, General Washington. If it were a sceptre, he has merited it, and would become it. It was a present to me from that excellent woman Madame de Forbach, the Dowager Duchess of Deux Ponts, connected with some verses which should go with it.

"My elegant crabtree walking stick, topped with a gold handle shaped like the Cap of Liberty,[Pg 236] I give to my friend and the friend of humanity, General Washington. If it were a scepter, he would deserve it, and it would suit him perfectly. It was a gift from the wonderful Madame de Forbach, the Dowager Duchess of Deux Ponts, along with some verses that should accompany it."


"Philadelphia, 23d June, 1789."

"Philadelphia, June 23, 1789."

The following epitaph was written by Dr. Franklin for himself when he was only twenty-three years of age, as appears by the original (with various corrections), found among his papers, and from which this is a faithful copy:

The following epitaph was written by Dr. Franklin for himself when he was only twenty-three years old, as shown by the original (with various corrections) found among his papers, and from which this is an accurate copy:

[Epitaph, written 1728.]

Epitaph, written 1728.

"THE BODY

OF

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN,

PRINTER,

(like the cover of an old book,
its contents torn out,
and stripped of its lettering and gilding),
lies here food for worms;
yet the work itself shall not be lost,
for it will (as he believed) appear once more
in a new and more elegant edition,
revised and corrected
by

THE AUTHOR."

"THE BODY

OF

BEN FRANKLIN,

PRINTER,

(like an old book cover,
its contents removed,
and stripped of its title and decorations),
rests here, food for worms;
yet the work itself won't be lost,
for it will (as he believed) reappear
in a new and more refined edition,
revised and corrected
by

THE AUTHOR."


FOOTNOTES:

[15] Dr. Stuber was born in Philadelphia, of German parents. He was sent at an early age to the university, where his genius, diligence, and amiable temper soon acquired him the particular notice and favour of those under whose immediate direction he was placed. After passing through the common course of study in a much shorter time than usual, he left the university at the age of sixteen, with great reputation. Not long after, he entered on the study of physic; and the zeal with which he pursued it, and the advances he made, gave his friends reason to form the most flattering prospects of his future eminence and usefulness in the profession. As Dr. Stuber's circumstances were very moderate, he did not think this pursuit well calculated to answer them. He therefore relinquished it after he had obtained a degree in the profession, and qualified himself to practice with credit and success, and immediately entered on the study of the law. While in the pursuit of the last-mentioned object, he was prevented, by a premature death, from reaping the fruit of those talents with which he was endowed, and of a youth spent in the ardent and successful pursuit of useful and elegant literature.

[15] Dr. Stuber was born in Philadelphia to German parents. He was sent to university at a young age, where his talent, hard work, and friendly nature quickly earned him the attention and favor of his professors. After completing his studies in a much shorter time than usual, he graduated at sixteen with an impressive reputation. Soon after, he began studying medicine, and his enthusiasm and progress led his friends to have high hopes for his future success and contributions to the field. However, since Dr. Stuber's financial situation was modest, he decided that medicine wasn’t the best path for him. After earning his degree and proving himself capable of practicing successfully, he shifted his focus to studying law. Unfortunately, he passed away prematurely before he could fully realize his potential and enjoy the fruits of his dedication to useful and elegant literature.

[16] Three days previous to his decease, he desired his daughter, Mrs. Sarah Bache, to have his bed made, "in order that he might die in a decent manner," as was his expression: an idea probably suggested by an acquaintance with the custom of the ancients. Mrs. Bache having replied that she hoped he would recover, and live many years longer, he instantly rejoined, "I hope not."

[16] Three days before he passed away, he asked his daughter, Mrs. Sarah Bache, to make his bed, "so that he could die in a decent way," as he put it: a thought likely inspired by his knowledge of ancient customs. When Mrs. Bache responded that she hoped he would recover and live many more years, he immediately replied, "I hope not."

[17] The Congress of the United States thus expressed their sentiments in return.

[17] The Congress of the United States expressed their thoughts in response.

Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be requested to cause to be communicated to the National Assembly of France, the peculiar sensibility of Congress to the tribute paid to the memory of Benjamin Franklin by the enlightened and free representatives of a great nation, in their decree of the eleventh June, one thousand seven hundred and ninety.

Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States is requested to convey to the National Assembly of France the deep gratitude of Congress for the tribute honoring Benjamin Franklin by the enlightened and free representatives of a great nation in their decision from June 11, 1790.

Signed,

Signed,

Fred. Aug. Muhlenberg,
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
John Adams,
Vice-President of the United States
and President of the Senate
.

Fred. Aug. Muhlenberg,
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
John Adams,
Vice President of the United States
and President of the Senate
.

Approved, March the 2d, 1791.

Approved, March 2, 1791.

Signed,

Signed,

GEORGE WASHINGTON,
President of the United States.

GEORGE WASHINGTON,
President of the United States.


WRITINGS OF FRANKLIN.

The Examination of Dr. Franklin before the British House of Commons, relative to the Repeal of the American Stamp-act.[18]

The Examination of Dr. Franklin before the British House of Commons, related to the Repeal of the American Stamp Act.[18]

1766, Feb. 3. Benjamin Franklin, Esq., and a number of other persons, were "ordered to attend the committee of the whole House of Commons, to whom it was referred to consider farther the several papers relative to America, which were presented to the House by Mr. Secretary Conway, &c."[Pg 238]

1766, Feb. 3. Benjamin Franklin, Esq., along with several other individuals, were "requested to attend the committee of the whole House of Commons to further discuss the various documents related to America that were submitted to the House by Mr. Secretary Conway, etc."[Pg 238]

Q. What is your name and place of abode?

Q. What is your name and where do you live?

A. Franklin, of Philadelphia.

Franklin, from Philadelphia.

Q. Do the Americans pay any considerable taxes among themselves?

Q. Do Americans pay significant taxes to one another?

A. Certainly, many, and very heavy taxes.

A. Sure, a lot of very heavy taxes.

Q. What are the present taxes in Pennsylvania, laid by the laws of the colony?

Q. What are the current taxes in Pennsylvania, established by the laws of the state?

A. There are taxes on all estates, real and personal; a poll tax; a tax on all offices, professions, trades, and businesses, according to their profits; an excise on all wine, rum, and other spirits; and a duty of ten pounds per head on all negroes imported, with some other duties.

A. There are taxes on all estates, both real and personal; a poll tax; a tax on all offices, professions, trades, and businesses based on their profits; an excise tax on all wine, rum, and other spirits; and a fee of ten pounds per person on all imported slaves, along with some other duties.

Q. For what purposes are those taxes laid?

Q. What are those taxes for?

A. For the support of the civil and military establishments of the country, and to discharge the heavy debt contracted in the last war.

A. To support the country's civil and military services and to pay off the significant debt incurred during the last war.

Q. How long are those taxes to continue?

Q. How long will those taxes continue?

A. Those for discharging the debt are to continue till 1772, and longer if the debt should not be then all discharged. The others must always continue.

A. Those responsible for paying off the debt will keep doing so until 1772, and longer if the debt isn't fully paid off by then. The others must always continue.

Q. Was it not expected that the debt would have been sooner discharged?

Q. Wasn't it expected that the debt would have been paid off sooner?

A. It was, when the peace was made with France and Spain. But a fresh war breaking out with the Indians, a fresh load of debt was incurred; and the taxes, of course, continued longer by a new law.

A. It was when peace was established with France and Spain. But when a new war broke out with the Indians, more debt was accumulated; and, naturally, the taxes continued for longer due to a new law.

Q. Are not all the people very able to pay those taxes?

Q. Can’t everyone afford to pay those taxes?

A. No. The frontier counties all along the continent having been frequently ravaged by the enemy, and greatly impoverished, are able to pay very little[Pg 239] tax. And therefore, in consideration of their distresses, our late tax laws do expressly favour those counties, excusing the sufferers; and I suppose the same is done in other governments.

A. No. The border counties across the continent have often been attacked by the enemy and are in a tough financial situation, so they can pay very little[Pg 239] tax. Because of their hardships, our recent tax laws specifically support those counties, exempting those affected; I assume other governments do the same.

Q. Are not you concerned in the management of the postoffice in America?

Q. Aren't you involved in managing the post office in America?

A. Yes. I am deputy postmaster-general of North America.

A. Yes. I'm the deputy postmaster general of North America.

Q. Don't you think the distribution of stamps by post to all the inhabitants very practicable, if there was no opposition?

Q. Don't you think distributing stamps by mail to everyone would be very doable if there were no objections?

A. The posts only go along the seacoasts; they do not, except in a few instances, go back into the country; and if they did, sending for stamps by post would occasion an expense of postage, amounting, in many cases, to much more than that of the stamps themselves. * * * *

A. The posts only run along the coastlines; they generally don’t extend into the inland areas, except in a few cases. If they did, ordering stamps by mail would lead to postage costs that, in many situations, would be much higher than the cost of the stamps themselves. * * * *

Q. From the thinness of the back settlements, would not the stamp-act be extremely inconvenient to the inhabitants, if executed?

Q. Given the sparsity of the back settlements, wouldn't the stamp act be really inconvenient for the residents if it were enforced?

A. To be sure it would; as many of the inhabitants could not get stamps when they had occasion for them, without taking long journeys, and spending perhaps three or four pounds, that the crown might get sixpence.

A. It definitely would; many of the locals couldn’t get stamps when they needed them without embarking on long trips and spending possibly three or four pounds, just so the crown could receive sixpence.

Q. Are not the colonies, from their circumstances, very able to pay the stamp duty?

Q. Aren't the colonies in a position to easily pay the stamp duty due to their circumstances?

A. In my opinion there is not gold and silver enough in the colonies to pay the stamp duty for one year.

A. In my opinion, there isn't enough gold and silver in the colonies to cover the stamp duty for a year.

Q. Don't you know that the money arising from the stamps was all to be laid out in America?

Q. Don't you realize that the money from the stamps was all supposed to be spent in America?

A. I know it is appropriated by the act to the American service; but it will be spent in the conquered colonies, where the soldiers are; not in the colonies that pay it.

A. I know it's allocated by the act for American service; but it will be used in the conquered colonies, where the soldiers are, not in the colonies that are funding it.

Q. Is there not a balance of trade due from the colonies where the troops are posted, that will bring back the money to the old colonies?[Pg 240]

Q. Isn't there a trade balance owed by the colonies where the troops are stationed, that will return the money to the original colonies?[Pg 240]

A. I think not. I believe very little would come back. I know of no trade likely to bring it back. I think it would come from the colonies where it was spent directly to England; for I have always observed, that in every colony, the more plenty the means of remittance to England, the more goods are sent for and the more trade with England carried on.

A. I don't think so. I believe very little would return. I don't know of any trade that could bring it back. I think it would go from the colonies where it was spent straight to England; because I've always noticed that in every colony, the easier it is to send money back to England, the more goods are ordered and the more trade with England takes place.

Q. What number of white inhabitants do you think there are in Pennsylvania?

Q. How many white residents do you think there are in Pennsylvania?

A. I suppose there may be about one hundred and sixty thousand?

A. I guess there are around one hundred sixty thousand?

Q. What number of them are Quakers?

Q. How many of them are Quakers?

A. Perhaps a third.

Maybe a third.

Q. What number of Germans?

Q. How many Germans?

A. Perhaps another third; but I cannot speak with certainty.

A. Maybe another third, but I can't say for sure.

Q. Have any number of the Germans seen service as soldiers in Europe?

Q. Have any of the Germans served as soldiers in Europe?

A. Yes, many of them, both in Europe and America.

A. Yes, a lot of them, both in Europe and America.

Q. Are they as much dissatisfied with the stamp duty as the English?

Q. Are they just as unhappy with the stamp duty as the English?

A. Yes, and more; and with reason, as their stamps are, in many cases, to be double.

A. Yes, and even more; and it makes sense, since their stamps are, in many cases, meant to be double.

Q. How many white men do you suppose there are in North America?

Q. How many white men do you think there are in North America?

A. About three hundred thousand, from sixteen to sixty years of age?

A. About three hundred thousand people, aged sixteen to sixty?

Q. What may be the amount of one year's imports into Pennsylvania from Britain?

Q. What could be the total value of one year's imports to Pennsylvania from Britain?

A. I have been informed that our merchants compute the imports from Britain to be above £500,000.

A. I've been told that our merchants estimate the imports from Britain to be over £500,000.

Q. What may be the amount of the produce of your province exported to Britain?

Q. What is the amount of your province's produce that is exported to Britain?

A. It must be small, as we produce little that is wanted in Britain. I suppose it cannot exceed £40,000.

A. It has to be small, since we don't produce much that is desired in Britain. I guess it can't be more than £40,000.

Q. How, then, do you pay the balance?[Pg 241]

Q. How do you settle the remaining balance?[Pg 241]

A. The balance is paid by our produce carried to the West Indies (and sold in our own islands, or to the French, Spaniards, Danes, and Dutch); by the same produce carried to other colonies in North America (as to New-England, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, Carolina, and Georgia); by the same, carried to different parts of Europe (as Spain, Portugal, and Italy). In all which places we receive either money, bills of exchange, or commodities that suit for remittance to Britain; which, together with all the profits on the industry of our merchants and mariners, arising in those circuitous voyages, and the freights made by their ships, centre finally to Britain to discharge the balance, and pay for British manufactures continually used in the provinces, or sold to foreigners by our traders.

A. The balance is covered by the goods we ship to the West Indies (and sell in our own islands, or to the French, Spanish, Danish, and Dutch); by the same goods sent to other colonies in North America (like New England, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, Carolina, and Georgia); and by the same goods going to various parts of Europe (such as Spain, Portugal, and Italy). In all these places, we receive either cash, bills of exchange, or products that can be sent back to Britain; which, along with all the profits generated by our merchants and sailors from these long voyages, and the freight charges earned by their ships, ultimately returns to Britain to settle the balance and pay for British goods that we constantly use in the provinces or sell to foreigners through our traders.

Q. Have you heard of any difficulties lately laid on the Spanish trade?

Q. Have you heard about any recent challenges affecting Spanish trade?

A. Yes, I have heard that it has been greatly obstructed by some new regulations, and by the English men-of-war and cutters stationed all along the coast in America.

A. Yes, I’ve heard that it has been significantly hindered by some new regulations, and by the British warships and cutters positioned all along the coast in America.

Q. Do you think it right that America should be protected by this country, and pay no part of the expense?

Q. Do you think it's fair that America should be protected by this country and not contribute any of the costs?

A. That is not the case. The colonies raised, clothed, and paid, during the last war, near twenty-five thousand men, and spent many millions.

A. That's not true. The colonies recruited, outfitted, and paid nearly twenty-five thousand men during the last war, and invested many millions.

Q. Were you not reimbursed by Parliament?

Weren't you paid back by Parliament?

A. We were only reimbursed what, in your opinion, we had advanced beyond our proportion, or beyond what might reasonably be expected from us; and it was a very small part of what we spent. Pennsylvania, in particular, disbursed about £500,000; and the reimbursements, in the whole, did not exceed £60,000.

A. We were only paid back what you think we spent beyond our share, or more than what could have been reasonably expected from us; and it was a very small portion of what we actually spent. Pennsylvania, in particular, spent about £500,000; and the total reimbursements didn’t go over £60,000.

Q. You have said that you pay heavy taxes in Pennsylvania; what do they amount to in the pound?

Q. You've mentioned that you pay significant taxes in Pennsylvania; how much do they total in pounds?

A. The tax on all estates, real and personal, is[Pg 242] eighteen pence in the pound, fully rated; and the tax on the profits of trades and professions, with other taxes, do, I suppose, make full half a crown in the pound.

A. The tax on all estates, both real and personal, is[Pg 242] eighteen pence for every pound, fully valued; and the tax on the profits from trades and professions, along with other taxes, I would guess, totals about two and a half shillings per pound.

Q. Do you know anything of the rate of exchange in Pennsylvania, and whether it has fallen lately?

Q. Do you know anything about the exchange rate in Pennsylvania, and whether it has dropped recently?

A. It is commonly from one hundred and seventy to one hundred and seventy-five. I have heard that it has fallen lately from one hundred and seventy-five to one hundred and sixty-two and a half, owing, I suppose, to their lessening their orders for goods; and when their debts to this country are paid, I think the exchange will probably be at par.

A. It's usually around one hundred seventy to one hundred seventy-five. I've heard it has recently dropped from one hundred seventy-five to one hundred sixty-two and a half, probably because they are reducing their orders for goods; and when they settle their debts to this country, I think the exchange will likely be at par.

Q. Do not you think the people of America would submit to pay the stamp duty if it was moderated?

Q. Don’t you think the people of America would agree to pay the stamp duty if it were reduced?

A. No, never, unless compelled by force of arms.

A. No, never, unless forced by the power of weapons.

Q. What was the temper of America towards Great Britain before the year 1763?

Q. What was America's attitude towards Great Britain before the year 1763?

A. The best in the world. They submitted willingly to the government of the crown, and paid in their courts obedience to acts of Parliament. Numerous as the people are in the several old provinces, they cost you nothing in forts, citadels, garrisons, or armies, to keep them in subjection. They were governed by this country at the expense only of a little pen, ink, and paper: they were led by a thread. They had not only a respect, but an affection for Great Britain; for its laws, its customs, and manners; and even a fondness for its fashions, that greatly increased the commerce. Natives of Britain were always treated with particular regard; to be an Old England-man was, of itself, a character of some respect, and gave a kind of rank among us. * * * *

A. The best in the world. They willingly accepted the rule of the crown and followed the laws passed by Parliament. Despite the large population in the various old provinces, they didn’t cost you anything in terms of forts, strongholds, garrisons, or armies to keep them under control. They were governed by this country at the expense of just some pen, ink, and paper: they were easily managed. They not only respected but also cared for Great Britain; they appreciated its laws, customs, and manners; and even liked its fashions, which greatly boosted trade. People from Britain were always treated with special consideration; being an Old England-man was, in itself, a mark of respect and gave a certain status among us. * * * *

Q. And what is their temper now?

Q. What’s their attitude now?

A. Oh, very much altered.

A. Oh, totally changed.

Q. Did you ever hear the authority of Parliament to make laws for America questioned till lately?

Q. Have you ever heard anyone challenge Parliament's authority to make laws for America until recently?

A. The authority of Parliament was allowed to[Pg 243] be valid in all laws, except such as should lay internal taxes. It was never disputed in laying duties to regulate commerce.

A. Parliament's authority was considered valid in all laws, except those imposing internal taxes. There was never any dispute over imposing duties to regulate trade.

Q. In what proportion had population increased in America?

Q. How much had the population increased in America?

A. I think the inhabitants of all the provinces together, taken at a medium, double in about twenty-five years. But their demand for British manufactures increases much faster; as the consumption is not merely in proportion to their numbers, but grows with the growing abilities of the same numbers to pay for them. In 1723, the whole importation from Britain to Pennsylvania was but about £15,000 sterling; it is now near half a million.

A. I believe that the population of all the provinces combined roughly doubles in about twenty-five years. However, their demand for British goods is increasing much more quickly; consumption doesn't just align with their population size, but also rises along with their growing ability to afford these goods. In 1723, the total imports from Britain to Pennsylvania were only about £15,000; now it's nearly half a million.

Q. In what light did the people of America use to consider the Parliament of Great Britain?

Q. How did the people of America used to view the Parliament of Great Britain?

A. They considered the Parliament as the great bulwark and security of their liberties and privileges, and always spoke of it with the utmost respect and veneration. Arbitrary ministers, they thought, might possibly, at times, attempt to oppress them; but they relied on it that the Parliament, on application, would always give redress. They remembered, with gratitude, a strong instance of this, when a bill was brought into Parliament, with a clause to make royal instructions laws in the colonies, which the House of Commons would not pass, and it was thrown out.

A. They viewed Parliament as the main defense and assurance of their rights and privileges, and always spoke about it with great respect and admiration. They believed that arbitrary ministers might occasionally try to oppress them, but they trusted that Parliament would always provide remedy when approached. They recalled, with gratitude, a significant example of this when a bill was proposed in Parliament that included a clause to turn royal instructions into laws in the colonies, which the House of Commons refused to pass, and it was rejected.

Q. And have they not still the same respect for Parliament?

Q. Do they still have the same respect for Parliament?

A. No, it is greatly lessened.

A. No, it's significantly reduced.

Q. To what cause is that owing?

What is that because of?

A. To a concurrence of causes; the restraints lately laid on their trade, by which the bringing of foreign gold and silver into the colonies was prevented; the prohibition of making paper money among themselves,[19] and then demanding a new and[Pg 244] heavy tax by stamps, taking away, at the same time, trials by juries, and refusing to receive and hear their humble petitions.

A. Due to a combination of factors: the recent restrictions on their trade, which stopped the import of foreign gold and silver into the colonies; the ban on creating their own paper money,[19] and then the demand for a new and[Pg 244] heavy stamp tax, while also eliminating trials by jury and ignoring their respectful petitions.

Q. Don't you think they would submit to the stamp-act if it was modified, the obnoxious parts taken out, and the duty reduced to some particulars of small moment?

Q. Don't you think they would agree to the stamp act if it were changed, the annoying parts removed, and the tax lowered to some minor details?

A. No, they will never submit to it.

A. No, they will never give in to it.

Q. What do you think is the reason that the people in America increase faster than in England?

Q. Why do you think the population in America is growing faster than in England?

A. Because they marry younger and more generally.

A. Because they tend to marry younger and more often.

Q. Why so?

Q. Why is that?

A. Because any young couple that are industrious may easily obtain land of their own, on which they can raise a family.

A. Because any hardworking young couple can easily get their own land, where they can start a family.

Q. Are not the lower rank of people more at their ease in America than in England?

Q. Are the lower class of people not more comfortable in America than in England?

A. They may be so if they are sober and diligent, as they are better paid for their labour.

A. They might be if they stay sober and work hard, since they get paid more for their efforts.

Q. What is your opinion of a future tax, imposed on the same principle with that of the stamp-act? How would the Americans receive it?

Q. What do you think about a future tax based on the same principle as the Stamp Act? How would Americans react to it?

A. Just as they do this. They would not pay it.

A. Just as they do this. They wouldn't pay for it.

Q. Have you not heard of the resolutions of this house and of the House of Lords, asserting the right of Parliament relating to America, including a power to tax the people there?

Q. Haven't you heard about the decisions made by this house and the House of Lords, which claim Parliament's right concerning America, including the authority to tax the people there?

A. Yes, I have heard of such resolutions.

A. Yes, I have heard of those resolutions.

Q. What will be the opinion of the Americans on those resolutions?

Q. What will Americans think about those resolutions?

A. They will think them unconstitutional and unjust.

A. They will consider them unconstitutional and unfair.

Q. Was it an opinion in America before 1763, that the Parliament had no right to lay taxes and duties there?

Q. Was it a common belief in America before 1763 that Parliament had no right to impose taxes and duties there?

A. I never heard any objection to the right of laying duties to regulate commerce, but a right to lay[Pg 245] internal taxes was never supposed to be in Parliament, as we are not represented there.

A. I never heard anyone argue against the right to impose duties to regulate trade, but the right to impose[Pg 245] internal taxes was never thought to belong to Parliament, since we are not represented there.

Q. On what do you found your opinion, that the people in America made any such distinction?

Q. What makes you think that people in America made any kind of distinction like that?

A. I know that whenever the subject has occurred in conversation where I have been present, it has appeared to be the opinion of every one, that we could not be taxed by a Parliament wherein we were not represented. But the payment of duties laid by an act of Parliament as regulations of commerce was never disputed.

A. I know that whenever the topic has come up in conversations I've been part of, it seems everyone's opinion is that we shouldn't be taxed by a Parliament where we aren't represented. However, the payment of duties set by a Parliament act as part of trade regulations has never been challenged.

Q. But can you name any act of Assembly, or public act of any of your governments, that made such distinction?

Q. But can you name any law or public action from your governments that created such a distinction?

A. I do not know that there was any; I think there was never an occasion to make any such act, till now that you have attempted to tax us: that has occasioned resolutions of Assembly declaring the distinction, in which I think every Assembly on the continent, and every member in every Assembly, have been unanimous. * * * *

A. I’m not sure that there ever was one; I believe there was never a reason to take such action until now that you’ve tried to tax us: that has led to resolutions from the Assembly declaring the distinction, where I think every Assembly on the continent and every member in each Assembly has been in complete agreement. * * * *

Q. You say the colonies have always submitted to external taxes, and object to the right of Parliament only, in laying internal taxes; now, can you show that there is any kind of difference between the two taxes to the colony on which they may be laid?

Q. You claim that the colonies have always accepted external taxes and only object to Parliament's right to impose internal taxes. Can you demonstrate that there is any real difference between the two types of taxes imposed on the colonies?

A. I think the difference is very great. An external tax is a duty laid on commodities imported; that duty is added to the first cost and other charges on the commodity, and, when it is offered for sale, makes a part of the price. If the people do not like it at that price, they refuse it; they are not obliged to pay it. But an internal tax is forced from the people without their consent, if not laid by their own representatives. The stamp-act says we shall have no commerce, make no exchange of property with each other, neither purchase nor grant, nor recover debts; we shall neither marry nor make our wills, unless we pay such and such sums; and[Pg 246] thus it is intended to extort our money from us, or ruin us by the consequences of refusing to pay it.

A. I think the difference is very significant. An external tax is a fee placed on goods being imported; that fee adds to the initial cost and other expenses of the goods, and when they are put up for sale, it becomes part of the price. If people don’t like that price, they can refuse to buy; they aren't required to pay it. But an internal tax is extracted from the people without their consent, unless imposed by their own representatives. The stamp act states that we cannot engage in trade, exchange property with one another, buy or sell, or recover debts; we cannot marry or write our wills unless we pay certain sums; and[Pg 246] thus it aims to force our money from us or drive us to ruin by the consequences of refusing to pay it.

Q. But supposing the external tax or duty to be laid on the necessaries of life imported into your colony, will not that be the same thing in its effects as an internal tax?

Q. But what if the external tax or duty is imposed on the essential goods brought into your colony? Wouldn't that have the same impact as an internal tax?

A. I do not know a single article imported into the northern colonies but what they can either do without or make themselves.

A. I don't know of any goods brought into the northern colonies that they can't either live without or produce on their own.

Q. Don't you think cloth from England absolutely necessary to them?

Q. Don't you think fabric from England is absolutely essential for them?

A. No, by no means absolutely necessary; with industry and good management, they may well supply themselves with all they want.

A. No, it's definitely not absolutely necessary; with hard work and good management, they can easily provide everything they need.

Q. Will it not take a long time to establish that manufacture among them; and must they not, in the mean while, suffer greatly?

Q. Isn't it going to take a while to set up that manufacturing among them? And won't they have to endure a lot in the meantime?

A. I think not. They have made a surprising progress already; and I am of opinion that, before their old clothes are worn out, they will have new ones of their own making.

A. I don't think so. They've already made impressive progress, and I believe that before their old clothes wear out, they’ll have new ones that they've made themselves.

Q. Can they possibly find wool enough in North America?

Q. Is there enough wool available in North America?

A. They have taken steps to increase the wool. They entered into general combinations to eat no more lamb; and very few lambs were killed last year. This course, persisted in, will soon make a prodigious difference in the quantity of wool. And the establishing of great manufactories, like those in the clothing towns here, is not necessary, as it is where the business is to be carried on for the purposes of trade. The people will all spin and work for themselves, in their own houses.

A. They have taken measures to boost wool production. They agreed to avoid eating lamb, and not many lambs were slaughtered last year. If they keep this up, it will significantly increase the amount of wool available. There’s no need to set up large factories like those in the nearby garment towns, since the work can be done at home. Everyone will spin and work for themselves in their own homes.

Q. Can there be wool and manufacture enough in one or two years?

Q. Can we produce enough wool and products in one or two years?

A. In three years I think there may.

A. In three years, I think there might be.

Q. Does not the severity of the winter in the northern colonies occasion the wool to be of bad quality?[Pg 247]

Q. Doesn't the harshness of winter in the northern colonies lead to poor-quality wool?[Pg 247]

A. No, the wool is very fine and good. * * * *

A. No, the wool is really fine and good. * * * *

Q. Considering the resolution of Parliament[20] as to the right, do you think, if the stamp-act is repealed, that the North Americans will be satisfied?

Q. Given Parliament's resolution[20] regarding the right, do you think that if the stamp act is repealed, the North Americans will be satisfied?

A. I believe they will.

I think they will.

Q. Why do you think so?

Q. Why do you think that?

A. I think the resolutions of right will give them very little concern if they are never attempted to be carried into practice. The colonies will probably consider themselves in the same situation in that respect with Ireland: they know you claim the same right with regard to Ireland, but you never exercise it. And they may believe you never will exercise it in the colonies any more than in Ireland, unless on some very extraordinary occasion.

A. I believe the resolutions of right won’t worry them much if they're never put into action. The colonies will likely see themselves in the same position as Ireland: they know you claim the same rights over Ireland, but you never enforce them. They might think you won’t enforce them in the colonies any more than in Ireland, unless there’s some really unusual situation.

Q. But who are to be the judges of that extraordinary occasion? Is not the Parliament?

Q. But who will be the judges of that extraordinary event? Isn't it the Parliament?

A. Though the Parliament may judge of the occasion, the people will think it can never exercise such right till representatives from the colonies are admitted into Parliament; and that, whenever the occasion arises, representatives will be ordered. * *

A. While Parliament might assess the situation, the people believe it can never have that right until representatives from the colonies are allowed into Parliament; and that, whenever the situation calls for it, representatives will be appointed. * *

Q. Can anything less than a military force carry the stamp-act into execution?

Q. Can anything other than a military force enforce the stamp act?

A. I do not see how a military force can be applied to that purpose.

A. I can't see how a military force can be used for that purpose.

Q. Why may it not?

Q. Why might it not?

A. Suppose a military force sent into America, they will find nobody in arms; what are they then to do? They cannot force a man to take stamps who chooses to do without them. They will not find a rebellion: they may indeed make one.

A. Imagine a military force sent to America; they’ll discover that nobody is fighting back. So, what are they supposed to do? They can't force someone to buy stamps if they decide they don’t need them. They won’t find a rebellion, but they might actually create one.

Q. If the act is not repealed, what do you think will be the consequence?

Q. If the act isn't repealed, what do you think will happen?

A. A total loss of the respect and affection the people of America bear to this country, and of all the commerce that depends on that respect and affection.[Pg 248]

A. A complete loss of the respect and affection that the people of America have for this country, along with all the commerce that relies on that respect and affection.[Pg 248]

Q. How can the commerce be affected?

How can commerce be impacted?

A. You will find that, if the act is not repealed, they will take very little of your manufactures in a short time.

A. You’ll see that if the law isn't revoked, they won't take much of your products in a short while.

Q. Is it in their power to do without them?

Can they manage without those?

A. I think they may very well do without them.

A. I think they can probably manage without them.

Q. Is it their interest not to take them?

Q. Is it in their best interest not to take them?

A. The goods they take from Britain are either necessaries, mere conveniences, or superfluities. The first, as cloth, &c., with a little industry they can make at home; the second they can do without till they are able to provide them among themselves; and the last, which are much the greatest part, they will strike off immediately. They are mere articles of fashion, purchased and consumed because the fashion in a respected country; but will now be detested and rejected. The people have already struck-off, by general agreement, the use of all goods fashionable in mournings, and many thousand pounds worth are sent back as unsaleable.

A. The goods they import from Britain are either necessities, minor conveniences, or luxuries. The first category, like cloth, etc., can be made at home with some effort; the second can be lived without until they can produce them locally; and the last, which make up the majority, will be completely eliminated. These are just trendy items bought and used because they are fashionable in a respected country, but now they will be rejected and scorned. The people have already collectively decided to stop using all goods fashionable for mourning, and thousands of pounds worth are being returned as unsellable.

Q. Is it their interest to make cloth at home?

Q. Is it beneficial for them to make cloth at home?

A. I think they may at present get it cheaper from Britain, I mean of the same fineness and neatness of workmanship; but when one considers other circumstances, the restraints on their trade, and the difficulty of making remittances, it is their interest to make everything.

A. I believe they can currently get it cheaper from Britain, meaning the same quality and craftsmanship; however, when you think about other factors, the limitations on their trade, and the challenges of sending money, it's in their best interest to produce everything themselves.

Q. Suppose an act of internal regulations connected with a tax, how would they receive it?

Q. If there was a rule regarding a tax, how would they respond to it?

A. I think it would be objected to.

A. I think that would be challenged.

Q. Then no regulation with a tax would be submitted to?

Q. So, no tax regulations would be proposed?

A. Their opinion is, that when aids to the crown are wanted, they are to be asked of the several assemblies, according to the old established usage; who will, as they always have done, grant them freely. And that their money ought not to be given away without their consent, by persons at a distance,[Pg 249] unacquainted with their circumstances and abilities. The granting aids to the crown is the only means they have of recommending themselves to their sovereign; and they think it extremely hard and unjust that a body of men, in which they have no representatives, should make a merit to itself of giving and granting what is not their own, but theirs; and deprive them of a right they esteem of the utmost importance, as it is the security of all their other rights.

A. Their view is that when the crown needs support, it should be requested from the various assemblies, following the established tradition; they will, as they always have, grant it willingly. They believe that their money shouldn't be given away without their approval by people who are far away,[Pg 249] unfamiliar with their situation and resources. Providing assistance to the crown is their only way of showing loyalty to their sovereign, and they find it very unfair and unjust that a group of people, in which they have no representation, should claim credit for giving away what isn’t theirs but belongs to them; and deprive them of a right they consider crucial, as it ensures the protection of all their other rights.

Q. But is not the postoffice, which they have long received, a tax as well as a regulation?

Q. But isn't the post office, which they've been getting for a long time, a tax as well as a regulation?

A. No; the money paid for the postage of a letter is not of the nature of a tax; it is merely a quantum meruit for a service done: no person is compellable to pay the money if he does not choose to receive the service. A man may still, as before the act, send his letter by a servant, a special messenger, or a friend, if he thinks it cheaper and safer.

A. No; the amount paid for sending a letter isn’t a tax; it's simply a quantum meruit for a service provided: no one is obligated to pay if they don’t want to use the service. A person can still, like before the law, send their letter through a servant, a special messenger, or a friend if they find that to be cheaper and safer.

Q. But do they not consider the regulations of the postoffice, by the act of last year, as a tax?

Q. But don't they see the post office regulations from last year as a tax?

A. By the regulations of last year, the rate of postage was generally abated near thirty per cent. through all America; they certainly cannot consider such abatement as a tax.

A. According to last year's regulations, postage rates were generally reduced by about thirty percent across America; they definitely can't see such a reduction as a tax.

Q. If an excise was laid by Parliament, which they might likewise avoid paying by not consuming the articles excised, would they then not object to it?

Q. If Parliament imposed a tax, which people could avoid by not using the taxed items, would they then not complain about it?

A. They would certainly object to it, as an excise is unconnected with any service done, and is merely an aid, which they think ought to be asked of them and granted by them, if they are to pay it, and can be granted for them by no others whatsoever, whom they have not empowered for that purpose.

A. They would definitely oppose it since an excise has no relation to any service provided; it’s just a contribution that they believe should be requested from them and permitted by them. If they are to pay it, it can only be granted by people they have authorized for that purpose, and no one else.

Q. You say they do not object to the right of Parliament in laying duties on goods to be paid on their importation: now, is there any kind of difference[Pg 250] between a duty on the importation of goods and an excise on their consumption?

Q. You say they don't have a problem with Parliament's authority to impose taxes on goods when they are imported: now, is there any real difference[Pg 250] between a tax on the importation of goods and a tax on their consumption?

A. Yes, a very material one: an excise, for the reasons I have just mentioned, they think you can have no right to lay within their country. But the sea is yours: you maintain, by your fleets, the safety of navigation in it, and keep it clear of pirates: you may have, therefore, a natural and equitable right to some toll or duty on merchandises carried through that part of your dominions, towards defraying the expense you are at in ships to maintain the safety of that carriage.

A. Yes, a very significant one: a tax, for the reasons I just mentioned, they believe you have no right to impose within their territory. But the sea is yours: you uphold the safety of navigation through your fleets and keep it free from pirates. Therefore, you may have a natural and fair right to some toll or duty on goods transported through that part of your domain to help cover the costs you're incurring with ships to ensure the safety of that transport.

Q. Does this reasoning hold in the case of a duty laid on the produce of their lands exported? And would they not then object to such a duty?

Q. Does this reasoning apply when there’s a duty placed on the produce of their lands exported? And wouldn’t they then have an issue with such a duty?

A. If it tended to make the produce so much dearer abroad as to lessen the demand for it, to be sure they would object to such a duty: not to your right of laying it, but they would complain of it as a burden, and petition you to lighten it. * * *

A. If it made the products so much more expensive abroad that it reduced the demand for them, they would certainly object to such a tax: not to your right to impose it, but they would see it as a burden and ask you to reduce it. * * *

Q. Supposing the stamp-act continued and enforced, do you imagine that ill-humour will induce the Americans to give as much for worse manufactures of their own, and use them preferable to better of ours?

Q. If the Stamp Act were to continue and be enforced, do you think that people's bad mood will lead Americans to pay as much for their own inferior products and prefer them over our better ones?

A. Yes, I think so. People will pay as freely to gratify one passion as another, their resentment as their pride.

A. Yes, I believe so. People will spend just as willingly to satisfy one desire as another, their anger as much as their pride.

Q. Would the people at Boston discontinue their trade?

Q. Would the people in Boston stop their trade?

A. The merchants are a very small number compared with the body of the people, and must discontinue their trade if nobody will buy their goods.

A. The merchants are just a tiny fraction of the population, and they have to stop their trade if no one is willing to buy their products.

Q. What are the body of the people in the colonies?

Q. What is the population of the people in the colonies?

A. They are farmers, husbandmen, or planters.

A. They are farmers, agricultural workers, or growers.

Q. Would they suffer the produce of their lands to rot?

Q. Would they let the fruits of their land go to waste?

A. No; but they would not raise so much. They would manufacture more and plough less.[Pg 251]

A. No; but they wouldn't produce as much. They would make more and farm less.[Pg 251]

Q. Would they live without the administration of justice in civil matters, and suffer all the inconveniences of such a situation for any considerable time, rather than take the stamps, supposing the stamps were protected by a sufficient force, where every one might have them?

Q. Would they be willing to live without the justice system for civil issues and deal with all the hardships that come with it for a significant amount of time, rather than accept the stamps, assuming the stamps were secure and available to everyone?

A. I think the supposition impracticable, that the stamps should be so protected as that every one might have them. The act requires sub-distributors to be appointed in every county town, district, and village, and they would be necessary. But the principal distributors, who were to have had a considerable profit on the whole, have not thought it worth while to continue in the office; and I think it impossible to find sub-distributors fit to be trusted, who, for the trifling profit that must come to their share, would incur the odium and run the hazard that would attend it; and if they could be found, I think it impracticable to protect the stamps in so many distant and remote places.

A. I believe it's unrealistic to think that the stamps could be protected well enough for everyone to access them. The law says that sub-distributors need to be appointed in every county town, district, and village, and that's definitely necessary. However, the main distributors, who were supposed to earn a significant profit overall, haven't found it worthwhile to keep their positions; and I think it's impossible to find sub-distributors who are trustworthy enough to take on this responsibility, especially since they'd only make a small profit and would face public backlash and risk. Even if we did find some, I think it's impractical to protect the stamps in so many far-off locations.

Q. But in places where they could be protected, would not the people use them rather than remain in such a situation, unable to obtain any right, or recover by law any debt?

Q. But in places where they could be protected, wouldn’t people use them instead of staying in a situation where they can’t obtain any rights or recover any debts through the law?

A. It is hard to say what they would do. I can only judge what other people will think and how they will act by what I feel within myself. I have a great many debts due to me in America, and I had rather they should remain unrecoverable by any law, than submit to the stamp-act. They will be debts of honour. It is my opinion, the people will either continue in that situation, or find some way to extricate themselves, perhaps by generally agreeing to proceed in the courts without stamps.

A. It's tough to predict what they'll do. I can only guess what others will think and how they'll act based on how I feel inside. I have a lot of debts owed to me in America, and I'd prefer they stay uncollectible by any law than agree to the stamp act. They will be debts of honor. I believe the people will either stay in that situation or find a way to get out of it, maybe by deciding together to go to court without using stamps.

Q. What do you think a sufficient military force to protect the distribution of the stamps in every part of America?

Q. What do you think is a sufficient military force to protect the distribution of the stamps in every part of America?

A. A very great force, I can't say what, if the disposition of America is for a general resistance[Pg 252]

A. A huge force, I can't specify what, if America is set on a united resistance[Pg 252]

Q. What is the number of men in America able to bear arms, or of disciplined militia?

Q. How many men in America are able to bear arms, or are part of a trained militia?

A. There are I suppose, at least....

A. There are, I guess, at least...

[Question objected to. He withdrew. Called in again.]

[Question challenged. He left. Called back in.]

Q. Is the American stamp-act an equal tax on the country?

Q. Is the American stamp act a fair tax on the country?

A. I think not.

I don't think so.

Q. Why so?

Q. Why is that?

A. The greatest part of the money must arise from lawsuits for the recovery of debts, and be paid by the lower sort of people, who were too poor easily to pay their debts. It is, therefore, a heavy tax on the poor, and a tax upon them for being poor.

A. Most of the money should come from lawsuits aimed at recovering debts, and it will be paid by the less fortunate, who are too poor to easily settle their debts. This acts as a significant burden on the poor, essentially taxing them for their poverty.

Q. But will not this increase of expense be a means Of lessening the number of lawsuits?

Q. But will this rise in costs reduce the number of lawsuits?

A. I think not; for as the costs all fall upon the debtor, and are to be paid by him, they would be no discouragement to the creditor to bring his action.

A. I don’t think so; since all the costs are incurred by the debtor and have to be paid by him, they wouldn’t discourage the creditor from filing his claim.

Q. Would it not have the effect of excessive usury?

Q. Wouldn't that be considered excessive interest?

A. Yes; as an oppression of the debtor. * * * *

A. Yes; as a burden on the borrower. * * * *

Q. Are there any slitting-mills in America?

Are there any slitting mills in the U.S.?

A. I think there are three, but I believe only one at present employed. I suppose they will all be set to work if the interruption of the trade continues.

A. I think there are three, but I believe only one is currently being used. I guess they will all be put to work if the disruption in trade continues.

Q. Are there any fulling-mills there?

Q. Are there any fabric mills there?

A. A great many.

A. A lot.

Q. Did you never hear that a great quantity of stockings were contracted for, for the army, during the war, and manufactured in Philadelphia?

Q. Have you ever heard that a large number of stockings were ordered for the army during the war and produced in Philadelphia?

A. I have heard so.

A. I’ve heard that too.

Q. If the stamp-act should be repealed, would not the Americans think they could oblige the Parliament to repeal every external tax-law now in force?

Q. If the Stamp Act were repealed, wouldn’t the Americans think they could force Parliament to repeal every external tax law currently in effect?

A. It is hard to answer questions of what people at such a distance will think.[Pg 253]

A. It's tough to say what people so far away will think.[Pg 253]

Q. But what do you imagine they will think were the motives of repealing the act?

Q. But what do you think their reasons for repealing the act will be?

A. I suppose they will think that it was repealed from a conviction of its inexpediency; and they will rely upon it, that, while the same inexpediency subsists, you will never attempt to make such another.

A. I guess they will believe that it was canceled because it was impractical; and they will trust that, as long as that impracticality remains, you will never try to create another one like it.

Q. What do you mean by its inexpediency?

Q. What do you mean by it being impractical?

A. I mean its inexpediency on several accounts: the poverty and inability of those who were to pay the tax, the general discontent it has occasioned, and the impracticability of enforcing it.

A. I mean it's not a good idea for several reasons: the poverty and inability of those who have to pay the tax, the widespread dissatisfaction it has caused, and the difficulty of enforcing it.

Q. If the act should be repealed, and the Legislature should show its resentment to the opposers of the stamp-act, would the colonies acquiesce in the authority of the Legislature? What is your opinion they would do?

Q. If the law were to be repealed, and the Legislature expressed its anger towards those who opposed the stamp act, would the colonies accept the authority of the Legislature? What do you think they would do?

A. I don't doubt at all that, if the Legislature repeal the stamp-act, the colonies will acquiesce in the authority.

A. I have no doubt that if the Legislature repeals the stamp act, the colonies will accept the authority.

Q. But if the Legislature should think fit to ascertain its right to lay taxes, by any act laying a small tax contrary to their opinion, would they submit to pay the tax?

Q. But if the Legislature decides to confirm its authority to impose taxes by enacting a small tax that goes against their views, would they agree to pay the tax?

A. The proceedings of the people in America have been considered too much together. The proceedings of the assemblies have been very different from those of the mobs, and should be distinguished, as having no connexion with each other. The assemblies have only peaceably resolved what they take to be their rights: they have taken no measures for opposition by force; they have not built a fort, raised a man, or provided a grain of ammunition, in order to such opposition. The ringleaders of riots, they think, ought to be punished: they would punish them themselves if they could. Every sober, sensible man would wish to see rioters punished, as otherwise peaceable people have no security of person or estate; but as to an internal[Pg 254] tax, how small soever, laid by the Legislature here on the people there, while they have no representatives in this Legislature, I think it will never be submitted to: they will oppose it to the last: they do not consider it as at all necessary for you to raise money on them by your taxes; because they are, and always have been, ready to raise money by taxes among themselves, and to grant large sums, equal to their abilities, upon requisition from the crown. They have not only granted equal to their abilities, but, during all the last war, they granted far beyond their abilities, and beyond their proportion with this country (you yourselves being judges) to the amount of many hundred thousand pounds; and this they did freely and readily, only on a sort of promise from the secretary of state that it should be recommended to Parliament to make them compensation. It was accordingly recommended to Parliament in the most honourable manner for them. America has been greatly misrepresented and abused here, in papers, and pamphlets, and speeches, as ungrateful, and unreasonable, and unjust, in having put this nation to immense expense for their defence, and refusing to bear any part of that expense. The colonies raised, paid, and clothed near twenty-five thousand men during the last war; a number equal to those sent from Britain, and far beyond their proportion: they went deeply into debt in doing this, and all their taxes and estates are mortgaged, for many years to come, for discharging that debt. Government here was at that time very sensible of this. The colonies were recommended to Parliament. Every year the king sent down to the house a written message to this purpose, "That his majesty, being highly sensible of the zeal and vigour with which his faithful subjects in North America had exerted themselves in defence of his majesty's just rights and possessions, recommended it to the house to take the[Pg 255] same into consideration, and enable him to give them a proper compensation." You will find those messages on your own journals every year of the war to the very last; and you did accordingly give £200,000 annually to the crown, to be distributed in such compensation to the colonies. This is the strongest of all proofs that the colonies, far from being unwilling to bear a share of the burden, did exceed their proportion; for if they had done less, or had only equalled their proportion, there would have been no room or reason for compensation. Indeed, the sums reimbursed them were by no means adequate to the expense they incurred beyond their proportion: but they never murmured at that; they esteemed their sovereign's approbation of their zeal and fidelity, and the approbation of this house, far beyond any other kind of compensation; therefore there was no occasion for this act to force money from a willing people: they had not refused giving money for the purposes of the act, no requisition had been made, they were always willing and ready to do what could reasonably be expected from them, and in this light they wish to be considered.

A. The actions of the people in America have often been grouped together too loosely. The conduct of the assemblies has been very different from that of the mobs and should be distinguished, as they have no connection with one another. The assemblies have only peacefully stated what they believe to be their rights: they have not taken any actions for opposition through force; they have not built a fort, raised a militia, or gathered any ammunition for such opposition. They believe the leaders of riots should be punished; they would punish them themselves if they could. Every reasonable and sensible person would want to see rioters punished, as otherwise, peaceful individuals have no security for their person or property; but regarding an internal [Pg 254] tax, no matter how small, imposed by the Legislature here on the people there, while they have no representatives in this Legislature, I believe it will never be accepted: they will resist it to the end. They do not think it is necessary for you to collect taxes from them; they are, and have always been, ready to raise money through taxes amongst themselves, and to grant substantial amounts, according to their abilities, upon request from the crown. They have not only granted according to their abilities but, during the last war, they contributed far beyond their means, and more than their fair share compared to this country (you yourselves being the judges) to the total of many hundreds of thousands of pounds; and they did this willingly, only on a sort of promise from the secretary of state that it would be suggested to Parliament to compensate them. It was indeed suggested to Parliament in the most honorable way for them. America has been greatly misrepresented and criticized here, in documents, pamphlets, and speeches, as ungrateful, unreasonable, and unjust, for having put this nation to tremendous expense for their defense while refusing to contribute to that expense. The colonies raised, funded, and outfitted nearly twenty-five thousand men during the last war; a number equal to what was sent from Britain, and far beyond their share: they went deeply into debt in doing this, and all their taxes and properties are mortgaged for many years to pay off that debt. The government here was very aware of this at that time. The colonies were recommended to Parliament. Every year, the king sent a written message to the house for this reason, stating, "That his majesty, being very aware of the enthusiasm and determination with which his loyal subjects in North America had acted in defense of his majesty's rightful claims and possessions, recommended that the house take the [Pg 255] matter into consideration and enable him to provide them with proper compensation." You will find those messages in your own records every year of the war until the end; and you subsequently allocated £200,000 annually to the crown, for distribution as compensation to the colonies. This is the strongest proof that the colonies, far from being unwilling to share in the burden, actually exceeded their fair share; for if they had done less, or had merely matched their share, there would have been no need or justification for compensation. In fact, the amounts reimbursed to them were by no means sufficient to cover the expenses they incurred beyond their share: but they never complained about it; they valued their sovereign's acknowledgment of their commitment and loyalty, and the acknowledgment of this house, far more than any other form of compensation; thus there was no need for this act to extract money from a willing people: they had not refused to provide funds for the purposes outlined in the act, no request had been made, and they were always willing and ready to do what could reasonably be expected from them, and they hope to be seen in this light.

Q. But suppose Great Britain should be engaged in a war in Europe, would North America contribute to the support of it?

Q. But what if Great Britain gets involved in a war in Europe, would North America pitch in to help?

A. I do think they would, as far as their circumstances would permit. They consider themselves as a part of the British empire, and as having one common interest with it: they may be looked on here as foreigners, but they do not consider themselves as such. They are zealous for the honour and prosperity of this nation; and, while they are well used, will always be ready to support it, as far as their little power goes. In 1739 they were called upon to assist in the expedition against Carthagena, and they sent three thousand men to join your army. It is true Carthagena is in America,[Pg 256] but as remote from the northern colonies as if it had been in Europe. They make no distinction of wars as to their duty of assisting in them. I know the last war is commonly spoken of here as entered into for the defence, or for the sake of the people in America. I think it is quite misunderstood. It began about the limits between Canada and Nova Scotia; about territories to which the crown indeed laid claim, but which were not claimed by any British colony; none of the lands had been granted to any colonist; we had, therefore, no particular concern or interest in that dispute. As to the Ohio, the contest there began about your right of trading in the Indian country; a right you had by the treaty of Utrecht, which the French infringed; they seized the traders and their goods, which were your manufactures; they took a fort which a company of your merchants, and their factors and correspondents, had erected there, to secure that trade. Braddock was sent with an army to retake that fort (which was looked on here as another encroachment on the king's territory) and to protect your trade. It was not till after his defeat that the colonies were attacked.[21] They were before in perfect peace with both French and Indians; the troops were not, therefore, sent for their defence. The trade with the Indians, though carried on in America, is not an American interest. The people of America are chiefly farmers and planters; scarce anything that they raise or produce is an article of commerce with the Indians. The Indian trade is a British interest; it is carried on with British manufactures, for the profit of British merchants and[Pg 257] manufacturers; therefore the war, as it commenced for the defence of territories of the crown (the property of no American) and for the defence of a trade purely British, was really a British war, and yet the people of America made no scruple of contributing their utmost towards carrying it on and bringing it to a happy conclusion.

A. I really think they would, as much as their situation allows. They see themselves as part of the British Empire, sharing a common interest with it: people might view them as foreigners here, but they don’t see themselves that way. They are passionate about the honor and success of this nation, and as long as they are treated well, they will always be willing to support it as much as they can. In 1739, they were asked to help in the expedition against Carthagena, and they sent three thousand men to join your army. It’s true that Carthagena is in America,[Pg 256] but it feels just as far from the northern colonies as if it were in Europe. They don’t differentiate between wars when it comes to their duty to assist. I know the last war is often talked about here as being fought for the defense or benefit of the people in America. I believe that’s a misunderstanding. It started over disputes about the boundaries between Canada and Nova Scotia; about lands that the crown claimed, but none of the British colonies laid claim to; no lands had been granted to any colonist, so we had no direct concern or interest in that argument. Regarding the Ohio, the conflict there began over your right to trade in the Indian territory; a right you obtained from the treaty of Utrecht, which the French violated. They seized your traders and their goods, which came from your factories; they took over a fort built by your merchants, their agents, and associates to secure that trade. Braddock was sent with an army to reclaim that fort (which was viewed here as another violation of the king's territory) and to protect your trade. It wasn’t until after his defeat that the colonies were attacked.[21] Before that, they lived in perfect peace with both the French and the Indians; so, the troops weren’t sent for their defense. The trade with the Indians, although conducted in America, is not an American interest. The people of America are mostly farmers and planters; hardly anything they grow or produce is traded with the Indians. The Indian trade is a British interest; it is conducted with British goods, for the profit of British merchants and[Pg 257] manufacturers; therefore, the war, which started to defend crown territories (that no American owned) and to protect a trade that is purely British, was in fact a British war, and yet the people of America had no hesitation in contributing their utmost to carry it on and bring it to a successful conclusion.

Q. Do you think, then, that the taking possession of the king's territorial rights, and strengthening the frontiers, is not an American interest?

Q. Do you think, then, that claiming the king's territorial rights and strengthening the borders is not in American interest?

A. Not particularly, but conjointly a British and an American interest.

A. Not really, but it's both a British and an American interest.

Q. You will not deny that the preceding war, the war with Spain, was entered into for the sake of America; was it not occasioned by captures made in the American seas?

Q. You won't deny that the earlier war, the war with Spain, was fought for the benefit of America; wasn't it started due to captures made in American waters?

A. Yes; captures of ships carrying on the British trade there with British manufactures.

A. Yes; seizures of ships involved in British trade there with British goods.

Q. Was not the late war with the Indians, since the peace with France, a war for America only?

Q. Wasn’t the recent war with the Indians, since the peace with France, a war solely for America?

A. Yes; it was more particularly for America than the former; but it was rather a consequence or remains of the former war, the Indians not having been thoroughly pacified; and the Americans bore by much the greatest share of the expense. It was put an end to by the army under General Bouquet; there were not above three hundred regulars in that army, and above one thousand Pennsylvanians.

A. Yes; it was especially for America rather than the previous situation; but it was more of a result or leftover from the earlier war, since the Native Americans hadn't been completely pacified. The Americans took on the majority of the costs. The conflict ended thanks to the army led by General Bouquet; there were only about three hundred regular soldiers in that army and over one thousand from Pennsylvania.

Q. Is it not necessary to send troops to America, to defend the Americans against the Indians?

Q. Is it really necessary to send troops to America to protect the Americans from the Indians?

A. No, by no means; it never was necessary. They defended themselves when they were but a handful, and the Indians much more numerous. They continually gained ground, and have driven the Indians over the mountains, without any troops sent to their assistance from this country. And can it be thought necessary now to send troops for their defence from those diminished Indian tribes,[Pg 258] when the colonies are become so populous and so strong? There is not the least occasion for it; they are very able to defend themselves. * * *

A. No, not at all; it was never necessary. They defended themselves when they were just a small group, and the Indians were much more numerous. They kept making progress and have pushed the Indians over the mountains, without any troops being sent from this country to help them. And can anyone really think it's necessary now to send troops for their defense against those smaller Indian tribes,[Pg 258] when the colonies are now so populous and strong? There’s absolutely no need for it; they can defend themselves just fine. * * *

Q. Do you think the assemblies have a right to levy money on the subject there, to grant to the crown?

Q. Do you think the assemblies have the right to tax people there, to provide to the crown?

A. I certainly think so; they have always done it.

A. I definitely think so; they’ve always done it.

Q. Are they acquainted with the declaration of rights? And do they know that, by that statute, money is not to be raised on the subject but by consent of Parliament?

Q. Are they familiar with the declaration of rights? And do they understand that, according to that law, money cannot be collected on the issue without the approval of Parliament?

A. They are very well acquainted with it.

They know it really well.

Q. How, then, can they think they have a right to levy money for the crown, or for any other than local purposes?

Q. So how can they think they have the right to collect money for the crown or for anything other than local purposes?

A. They understand that clause to relate to subjects only within the realm; that no money can be levied on them for the crown but by consent of Parliament. The colonies are not supposed to be within the realm; they have assemblies of their own, which are their parliaments, and they are, in that respect, in the same situation with Ireland. When money is to be raised for the crown upon the subject in Ireland or in the colonies, the consent is given in the Parliament of Ireland or in the assemblies of the colonies. They think the Parliament of Great Britain cannot properly give that consent till it has representatives from America; for the petition of right expressly says, it is to be by common consent in Parliament; and the people of America have no representatives in Parliament to make a part of that common consent.

A. They believe that clause applies only to subjects within the realm; that no taxes can be imposed on them for the crown without the consent of Parliament. The colonies are not considered part of the realm; they have their own assemblies, which act as their parliaments, and in that sense, they are in the same position as Ireland. When funds are needed for the crown from subjects in Ireland or the colonies, the consent comes from the Parliament of Ireland or the assemblies of the colonies. They think the Parliament of Great Britain can't properly give that consent until it includes representatives from America; because the petition of right clearly states that it must be by common consent in Parliament; and the people of America have no representatives in Parliament to contribute to that common consent.

Q. If the stamp-act should be repealed, and an act should pass ordering the assemblies of the colonies to indemnify the sufferers by the riots, would they do it?

Q. If the Stamp Act were to be repealed and a law were passed requiring the colonial assemblies to compensate those affected by the riots, would they do it?

A. That is a question I cannot answer.

A. That's a question I can't answer.

Q. Suppose the king should require the colonies to grant a revenue, and the Parliament should be[Pg 259] against their doing it, do they think they can grant a revenue to the king without the consent of the Parliament of Great Britain?

Q. What if the king asks the colonies to provide revenue, and Parliament is[Pg 259] opposed to it? Do they believe they can give revenue to the king without the approval of the Parliament of Great Britain?

A. That is a deep question. As to my own opinion, I should think myself at liberty to do it, and should do it if I liked the occasion.

A. That's a deep question. In my opinion, I believe I would be free to do it, and I would do it if I liked the situation.

Q. When money has been raised in the colonies upon requisition, has it not been granted to the king?

Q. When money has been raised in the colonies upon request, hasn't it been given to the king?

A. Yes, always; but the requisitions have generally been for some service expressed, as to raise, clothe, and pay troops, and not for money only.

A. Yes, always; but the requests have usually been for specific services, like raising, clothing, and paying troops, rather than just for money.

Q. If the act should pass requiring the American assemblies to make compensation to the sufferers, and they should disobey it, and then the Parliament should, by another act, lay an internal tax, would they then obey it?

Q. If the law passes that requires the American assemblies to compensate the victims, and they refuse to comply, then if Parliament passes another law imposing a local tax, would they comply with that?

A. The people will pay no internal tax; and I think an act to oblige the assemblies to make compensation is unnecessary; for I am of opinion that, as soon as the present heats are abated, they will take the matter into consideration, and, if it is right to be done, they will do it themselves.

A. The people won't pay any internal tax; and I believe a law requiring the assemblies to provide compensation isn't needed; because I think that once the current tensions die down, they will consider the issue, and if it needs to be done, they will take care of it on their own.

Q. Do not letters often come into the postoffices in America directed to some inland town where no post goes?

Q. Don't letters often arrive at post offices in America addressed to some inland town that doesn’t receive mail?

A. Yes.

A. Yep.

Q. Can any private person take up those letters, and carry them as directed?

Q. Can anyone take those letters and deliver them as instructed?

A. Yes; any friend of the person may do it, paying the postage that has accrued.

A. Yes; any friend of the person can do it, covering the postage that has piled up.

Q. But must not he pay an additional postage for the distance to such inland town?

Q. But doesn’t he have to pay extra postage for the distance to that inland town?

A. No.

No.

Q. Can the postmaster answer delivering the letter, without being paid such additional postage?

Q. Can the postmaster deliver the letter without receiving extra postage?

A. Certainly he can demand nothing where he does no service.

A. Of course, he can't ask for anything if he doesn't provide any value.

Q. Suppose a person, being far from home, finds[Pg 260] a letter in a postoffice directed to him, and he lives in a place to which the post generally goes, and the letter is directed to that place, will the postmaster deliver him the letter without his paying the postage receivable at the place to which the letter is directed?

Q. Imagine someone, far from home, finds[Pg 260] a letter at a post office addressed to him, and he lives in an area where the mail usually goes, and the letter is addressed to that area. Will the postmaster give him the letter without requiring him to pay the postage due for the destination?

A. Yes; the office cannot demand postage for a letter that it does not carry, or farther than it does carry it.

A. Yes; the office can't charge for shipping a letter that it doesn't deliver, or beyond the distance it does deliver it.

Q. Are not ferrymen in America obliged, by act of Parliament, to carry over the posts without pay?

Q. Aren't ferrymen in America required, by law, to transport the mail without charge?

A. Yes.

Yes.

Q. Is not this a tax on the ferrymen?

Q. Isn't this a tax on the ferrymen?

A. They do not consider it as such, as they have an advantage from persons travelling with the post.

A. They don’t see it that way since they benefit from people traveling with the mail.

Q. If the stamp-act should be repealed, and the crown should make a requisition to the colonies for a sum of money, would they grant it?

Q. If the stamp act were repealed, and the crown requested a sum of money from the colonies, would they agree to it?

A. I believe they would.

I think they would.

Q. Why do you think so?

Q. Why do you think that?

A. I can speak for the colony I live in: I have it in instruction from the Assembly to assure the ministry, that as they always had done, so they should always think it their duty to grant such aids to the crown as were suitable to their circumstances and abilities, whenever called upon for that purpose, in the usual constitutional manner; and I had the honour of communicating this instruction to that honourable gentleman then minister.

A. I can speak for the colony I live in: I have been directed by the Assembly to inform the ministry that, just as they have always done, they will always consider it their duty to provide assistance to the crown that aligns with their situation and capabilities whenever they are asked to do so, in the usual constitutional way; and I had the honor of conveying this direction to that honorable gentleman who was the minister at the time.

Q. Would they do this for a British concern, as suppose a war in some part of Europe that did not affect them?

Q. Would they do this for a British company, like if there was a war in some part of Europe that didn’t impact them?

A. Yes, for anything that concerned the general interest. They consider themselves as part of the whole.

A. Yes, for anything that involved the common good. They see themselves as part of the larger community.

Q. What is the usual constitutional manner of calling on the colonies for aids?

Q. What is the typical constitutional way to request support from the colonies?

A. A letter from the secretary of state.[Pg 261]

A. A letter from the Secretary of State.[Pg 261]

Q. Is this all you mean; a letter from the secretary of state?

Q. Is that what you mean; just a letter from the secretary of state?

A. I mean the usual way of requisition, in a circular letter from the secretary of state, by his majesty's command, reciting the occasion, and recommending it to the colonies to grant such aid as became their loyalty, and were suitable to their abilities.

A. I’m talking about the standard process for requesting assistance, which is done through a circular letter from the secretary of state, ordered by the king, explaining the situation and urging the colonies to provide support that aligns with their loyalty and is appropriate to their resources.

Q. Did the secretary of state ever write for money for the crown?

Q. Did the secretary of state ever write for money for the crown?

A. The requisitions have been to raise, clothe, and pay men, which cannot be done without money.

A. The requests have been to recruit, outfit, and compensate men, which cannot be done without money.

Q. Would they grant money alone, if called on?

Q. Would they provide money alone if asked?

A. In my opinion they would, money as well as men, when they have money, or can make it.

A. I think they would, both money and people, when they have money or are able to make it.

Q. If the Parliament should repeal the stamp-act, will the Assembly of Pennsylvania rescind their resolutions?

Q. If Parliament repeals the stamp act, will the Pennsylvania Assembly withdraw their resolutions?

A. I think not.

I don't think so.

Q. Before there was any thought of the stamp-act, did they wish for a representation in Parliament?

Q. Before anyone even considered the stamp act, did they want representation in Parliament?

A. No.

A. Nah.

Q. Don't you know that there is, in the Pennsylvania charter, an express reservation of the right of Parliament to lay taxes there?

Q. Don't you realize that the Pennsylvania charter explicitly reserves Parliament's right to impose taxes there?

A. I know there is a clause in the charter by which the king grants that he will levy no taxes on the inhabitants, unless it be with the consent of the Assembly or by act of Parliament.

A. I know there's a provision in the charter that states the king won't impose any taxes on the residents unless he has the Assembly's approval or it's done through an act of Parliament.

Q. How, then, could the Assembly of Pennsylvania assert, that laying a tax on them by the stamp-act was an infringement of their rights?

Q. How, then, could the Assembly of Pennsylvania claim that taxing them with the stamp act was a violation of their rights?

A. They understand it thus: by the same charter, and otherwise, they are entitled to all the privileges and liberties of Englishmen; they find in the great charters, and the petition and declaration of rights, that one of the privileges of English subjects is, that they are not to be taxed but by their common[Pg 262] consent; they have therefore relied upon it, from the first settlement of the province, that the Parliament never would nor could, by colour of that clause in the charter, assume a right of taxing them, till it had qualified itself to exercise such right, by admitting representatives from the people to be taxed, who ought to make a part of that common consent.

A. They see it this way: through the same charter and other means, they're entitled to all the rights and freedoms of English citizens. They refer to the major charters and the petition and declaration of rights, which state that one of the rights of English subjects is that they cannot be taxed without their common[Pg 262] consent; therefore, they have always believed, since the province was first settled, that Parliament would never be able to claim the right to tax them, until it allowed representatives from those being taxed, who should be part of that common consent, to participate.

Q. Are there any words in the charter that justify that construction?

Q. Are there any words in the charter that support that interpretation?

A. The common rights of Englishmen, as declared by Magna Charta and the Petition of Right, all justify it. * * * *

A. The basic rights of English citizens, as stated in the Magna Carta and the Petition of Right, all support it. * * * *

Q. Are all parts of the colonies equally able to pay taxes?

Q. Can all parts of the colonies pay taxes equally?

A. No, certainly; the frontier parts, which have been ravaged by the enemy, are greatly disabled by that means; and, therefore, in such cases, are usually favoured in our tax-laws.

A. No, definitely; the border areas, which have been devastated by the enemy, are seriously impaired because of that, and so, in these situations, they are typically given some leniency in our tax laws.

Q. Can we, at this distance, be competent judges of what favours are necessary?

Q. Can we, from this distance, really be good judges of what favors are needed?

A. The Parliament have supposed it, by claiming a right to make tax-laws for America; I think it impossible.

A. The Parliament thinks they have the right to create tax laws for America; I believe that's impossible.

Q. Would the repeal of the stamp-act be any discouragement of your manufactures? Will the people that have begun to manufacture decline it?

Q. Would repealing the stamp act discourage your manufacturing? Will the people who have started manufacturing give it up?

A. Yes, I think they will; especially if, at the same time, the trade is open again, so that remittances can be easily made. I have known several instances that make it probable. In the war before last, tobacco being low, and making little remittance, the people of Virginia went generally into family manufactures. Afterward, when tobacco bore a better price, they returned to the use of British manufactures. So fulling-mills were very much disused in the last war in Pennsylvania, because bills were then plenty, and remittances could easily be made to Britain for English cloth and other goods.[Pg 263]

A. Yes, I think they will; especially if, at the same time, trade is open again, so that sending money back home can be done easily. I've seen several instances that make this likely. In the previous war, when tobacco prices were low and generated little income, the people of Virginia turned to making things for themselves. Later, when tobacco prices improved, they went back to using British products. Similarly, fulling mills were hardly used in the last war in Pennsylvania because there was plenty of money, and it was easy to send payments to Britain for English cloth and other goods.[Pg 263]

Q. If the stamp-act should be repealed, would it induce the assemblies of America to acknowledge the rights of Parliament to tax them, and would they erase their resolutions?

Q. If the stamp act were repealed, would it lead the assemblies in America to recognize Parliament's right to tax them, and would they withdraw their resolutions?

A. No, never.

No way.

Q. Are there no means of obliging them to erase those resolutions?

Q. Is there any way to force them to take back those resolutions?

A. None that I know of; they will never do it, unless compelled by force of arms.

A. None that I know of; they will never do it, unless forced by military power.

Q. Is there a power on earth that can force them to erase them?

Q. Is there any power on earth that can make them erase them?

A. No power, how great soever, can force men to change their opinions.

A. No amount of power, no matter how great, can make people change their opinions.

Q. Do they consider the postoffice as a tax or as a regulation?

Q. Do they see the post office as a tax or a regulation?

A. Not as a tax, but as a regulation and convenience; every assembly encouraged it, and supported it in its infancy by grants of money, which they would not otherwise have done; and the people have always paid the postage.

A. Not as a tax, but as a regulation and convenience; every assembly promoted it and backed it in its early stages with funding that they wouldn't have provided otherwise; and the public has always covered the postage.

Q. When did you receive the instructions you mentioned?

Q. When did you get the instructions you talked about?

A. I brought them with me when I came to England, about fifteen months since.

A. I brought them with me when I came to England, about fifteen months ago.

Q. When did you communicate that instruction to the minister?

Q. When did you give that instruction to the minister?

A. Soon after my arrival; while the stamping of America was under consideration, and before the bill was brought in.

A. Shortly after I got here; while they were discussing the stamping of America, and before the bill was introduced.

Q. Would it be most for the interest of Great Britain to employ the hands of Virginia in tobacco or in manufactures?

Q. Would it be in the best interest of Great Britain to have Virginia focus on tobacco or on manufacturing?

A. In tobacco, to be sure.

In tobacco, for sure.

Q. What used to be the pride of the Americans?

Q. What used to be a source of pride for Americans?

A. To indulge in the fashions and manufactures of Great Britain.

A. To enjoy the styles and products of Great Britain.

Q. What is now their pride?

What are they proud of now?

A. To wear their old clothes over again, till they can make new ones.[Pg 264]

A. To wear their old clothes again until they can make new ones.[Pg 264]

Feb. 13. Benjamin Franklin, Esq., having passed through his examination, was exempted from farther attendance.

Feb. 13. Benjamin Franklin, Esq., after completing his examination, was excused from further attendance.

He withdrew.

He backed out.

Feb. 24. The resolutions of the committee were reported by the chairman, Mr. Fuller, their seventh and last resolution setting forth, "that it was their opinion that the House be moved, that leave be given to bring in a bill to repeal the stamp-act." A proposal for recommitting this resolution was negatived by 240 votes to 133.—Journals of the House of Commons.

Feb. 24. The committee's resolutions were presented by the chairman, Mr. Fuller, their seventh and final resolution stating, "it is our opinion that the House should agree to allow the introduction of a bill to repeal the stamp act." A proposal to revisit this resolution was rejected by a vote of 240 to 133.—Journals of the House of Commons.


Narrative of the Massacre of Friendly Indians in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, 1764.

Narrative of the Massacre of Friendly Indians in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, 1764.

These Indians were the remains of a tribe of the Six Nations, settled at Conestogo, and thence called Conestogo Indians. On the first arrival of the English in Pennsylvania, messengers from this tribe came to welcome them, with presents of venison, corn, and skins; and the whole tribe entered into a treaty of friendship with the first proprietor, William Penn, which was to last "as long as the sun should shine, or the waters run in the rivers."

These Indians were the remnants of a tribe from the Six Nations, based at Conestogo, and therefore called the Conestogo Indians. When the English first arrived in Pennsylvania, messengers from this tribe came to greet them, bringing gifts of venison, corn, and animal skins. The entire tribe then entered into a friendship treaty with the first proprietor, William Penn, which was meant to last "as long as the sun shines or the waters flow in the rivers."

This treaty has been since frequently renewed, and the chain brightened, as they express it, from time to time. It has never been violated, on their part or ours, till now. As their lands by degrees were mostly purchased, and the settlements of the white people began to surround them, the proprietor assigned them lands on the manor of Conestogo, which they might not part with; there they have lived many years in friendship with their white[Pg 265] neighbours, who loved them for their peaceable, inoffensive behaviour.

This treaty has been frequently renewed since then, and the bond has been strengthened, as they say, from time to time. It has never been broken, by them or by us, until now. As their lands were mostly bought gradually, and the settlements of the white people started to surround them, the owner assigned them lands on the manor of Conestogo, which they could not sell; they have lived there for many years in harmony with their white[Pg 265] neighbors, who appreciated them for their peaceful and non-confrontational behavior.

It has always been observed, that Indians settled in the neighbourhood of white people do not increase, but diminish continually. This tribe accordingly went on diminishing, till there remained in their town on the manor but twenty persons, viz., seven men, five women, and eight children, boys and girls.

It has always been noted that Native Americans living near white people do not grow in number, but keep decreasing. This group continued to shrink until only twenty people were left in their town on the estate: seven men, five women, and eight children, both boys and girls.

Of these, Shehaes was a very old man, having assisted at the second treaty held with them, by Mr. Penn, in 1701, and ever since continued a faithful and affectionate friend to the English. He is said to have been an exceeding good man, considering his education, being naturally of a most kind, benevolent temper.

Of these, Shehaes was a very old man, having participated in the second treaty held with them by Mr. Penn in 1701, and ever since has been a faithful and caring friend to the English. He is said to have been an exceptionally good man, given his upbringing, naturally having a kind and generous disposition.

Peggy was Shehaes's daughter; she worked for her aged father, continuing to live with him, though married, and attended him with filial duty and tenderness.

Peggy was Shehaes's daughter; she worked for her elderly father, still living with him despite being married, and cared for him with devotion and kindness.

John was another good old man; his son Harry helped to support him.

John was another good old man; his son Harry helped take care of him.

George and Will Soc were two brothers, both young men.

George and Will Soc were two brothers, both young men.

John Smith, a valuable young man of the Cayuga nation, who became acquainted with Peggy, Shehaes's daughter, some few years since, married and settled in that family. They had one child, about three years old.

John Smith, a valuable young man from the Cayuga Nation, who got to know Peggy, Shehaes's daughter, a few years ago, got married and became part of that family. They had one child, who is about three years old.

Betty, a harmless old woman; and her son Peter, a likely young lad.

Betty, a sweet old lady, and her son Peter, a promising young man.

Sally, whose Indian name was Wyanjoy, a woman much esteemed by all that knew her, for her prudent and good behaviour in some very trying situations of life. She was a truly good and an amiable woman, had no children of her own; but, a distant relation dying, she had taken a child of that relation's to bring up as her own, and performed towards it all the duties of an affectionate parent.[Pg 266]

Sally, who was known by her Indian name Wyanjoy, was a woman highly regarded by everyone who knew her for her wise and kind actions in some very challenging situations in life. She was genuinely kind and lovable, but she had no children of her own; however, when a distant relative passed away, she took in that relative's child to raise as her own and fulfilled all the duties of a loving parent.[Pg 266]

The reader will observe that many of their names are English. It is common with the Indians, that have an affection for the English, to give themselves and their children the names of such English persons as they particularly esteem.

The reader will notice that many of their names are English. It's common among the Indians, who have a fondness for the English, to name themselves and their children after English people they particularly admire.

This little society continued the custom they had begun, when more numerous, of addressing every new governor and every descendant of the first proprietor, welcoming him to the province, assuring him of their fidelity, and praying a continuance of that favour and protection they had hitherto experienced. They had accordingly sent up an address of this kind to our present governor on his arrival; but the same was scarce delivered when the unfortunate catastrophe happened which we are about to relate.

This small community kept up the tradition they had started when they were larger, of greeting every new governor and every descendant of the original owner, welcoming him to the area, assuring him of their loyalty, and asking for the continued support and protection they had enjoyed so far. So, they sent a message like this to our current governor when he arrived; but it was barely delivered when the unfortunate event occurred that we are about to describe.

On Wednesday, the 14th of December, 1763, fifty-seven men from some of our frontier townships, who had projected the destruction of this little commonwealth, came, all well mounted, and armed with firelocks, hangers, and hatchets, having travelled through the country in the night, to Conestogo manor. There they surrounded the small village of Indian huts, and just at break of day broke into them all at once. Only three men, two women, and a young boy were found at home, the rest being out among the neighbouring white people, some to sell the baskets, brooms, and bowls they manufactured, and others on other occasions. These poor defenceless creatures were immediately fired upon, stabbed, and hatcheted to death! The good Shehaes, among the rest, cut to pieces in his bed. All of them were scalped and otherwise horribly mangled. Then their huts were set on fire, and most of them burned down. When the troop, pleased with their own conduct and bravery, but enraged that any of the poor Indians had escaped the massacre, rode off, and in small parties, by different roads, went home.[Pg 267]

On Wednesday, December 14, 1763, fifty-seven men from some of our frontier communities, who had planned to destroy this small settlement, arrived well-mounted and armed with firearms, knives, and hatchets, having traveled through the countryside during the night to Conestogo manor. They surrounded the small village of Indian huts and, just at dawn, broke into them all at once. Only three men, two women, and a young boy were at home; the rest were among the neighboring white people, some selling the baskets, brooms, and bowls they made, while others were out for various reasons. These poor defenseless individuals were immediately shot at, stabbed, and hacked to death! The kind Shehaes, among others, was cut to pieces in his bed. All of them were scalped and brutally mutilated. Then their huts were set on fire, and most of them burned down. Afterward, the group, pleased with their actions and bravery but furious that any of the poor Indians had escaped the massacre, rode off in small groups, taking different routes home.[Pg 267]

The universal concern of the neighbouring white people on hearing of this event, and the lamentations of the younger Indians when they returned and saw the desolation, and the butchered, half-burned bodies of their murdered parents and other relations, cannot well be expressed.

The widespread worry among the nearby white people upon hearing about this event, and the grief of the younger Indians when they returned to see the devastation, along with the butchered, half-burned bodies of their murdered parents and other relatives, is hard to convey.

The magistrates of Lancaster sent out to collect the remaining Indians, brought them into the town for their better security against any farther attempt, and, it is said, condoled with them on the misfortune that had happened, took them by the hand, comforted, and promised them protection. They were all put into the workhouse, a strong building as the place of greatest safety.

The magistrates of Lancaster sent out to gather the remaining Native Americans, brought them into town for their protection against any further attempts, and, it’s said, expressed sympathy for the misfortune they had experienced, took them by the hand, comforted them, and promised them safety. They were all placed in the workhouse, a sturdy building considered the safest place.

When the shocking news arrived in town, a proclamation was issued by the governor, detailing the particulars of this horrible outrage, and calling earnestly upon the people of the province to use all possible means to apprehend and bring to condign punishment its savage perpetrators.

When the shocking news reached town, the governor issued a statement outlining the details of this horrible crime and urgently urged the people of the province to do everything they could to catch and appropriately punish the brutal perpetrators.

Notwithstanding this proclamation, those cruel men again assembled themselves, and, hearing that the remaining fourteen Indians were in the workhouse at Lancaster, they suddenly appeared in that town on the 27th of December. Fifty of them, armed as before, dismounting, went directly to the workhouse, and by violence broke open the door, and entered with the utmost fury in their countenances. When the poor wretches saw they had no protection nigh, nor could possibly escape, and being without the least weapon for defence, they divided into their little families, the children clinging to the parents; they fell on their knees, protested their innocence, declared their love to the English, and that, in their whole lives, they had never done them injury; and in this posture they all received the hatchet! Men, women, and little children were every one inhumanly murdered in cold blood!

Despite this announcement, those brutal men gathered again, and upon hearing that the remaining fourteen Indians were in the workhouse at Lancaster, they suddenly showed up in that town on December 27th. Fifty of them, armed as before, dismounted and went straight to the workhouse, where they violently broke open the door and stormed in with fury etched on their faces. When the terrified people realized they had no protection nearby, couldn't escape, and were completely defenseless, they huddled into their small families, with the children clinging to their parents. They fell to their knees, pleaded their innocence, expressed their love for the English, and insisted that they had never harmed them in their entire lives; and in this position, they all met their fate! Men, women, and young children were all brutally murdered in cold blood!

The barbarous men who committed the atrocious[Pg 268] fact, in defiance of government, of all laws human and divine, and to the eternal disgrace of their country and colour, then mounted their horses, huzzaed in triumph, as if they had gained a victory, and rode off unmolested!

The brutal men who carried out the horrific[Pg 268] act, ignoring the government, all human and divine laws, and bringing lasting shame to their country and race, then got on their horses, cheered in celebration, as if they had won a victory, and rode away without being stopped!

The bodies of the murdered were then brought out and exposed in the street, till a hole could be made in the earth to receive and cover them.

The bodies of the murdered were then taken out and displayed in the street until a grave could be dug to bury and cover them.

But the wickedness cannot be covered; the guilt will lie on the whole land, till justice is done on the murderers. The blood of the innocent will cry to Heaven for vengeance.

But the wrongdoing cannot be hidden; the guilt will rest on the entire land until justice is served on the murderers. The blood of the innocent will cry out to Heaven for vengeance.

It is said that Shehaes, being before told that it was to be feared some English might come from the frontier into the country and murder him and his people, he replied, "It is impossible; there are Indians, indeed, in the woods, who would kill me and mine, if they could get at us, for my friendship to the English; but the English will wrap me in their matchcoat and secure me from all danger." How unfortunately was he mistaken!

It is said that Shehaes, when warned that some English settlers might come from the frontier and kill him and his people, responded, "That's impossible; there are indeed Indians in the woods who would kill me and my people if they could reach us, because of my friendship with the English. But the English will protect me and keep me safe from all danger." How sadly mistaken he was!

Another proclamation has been issued, offering a great reward for apprehending the murderers.

Another announcement has been made, offering a substantial reward for capturing the murderers.

But these proclamations have as yet produced no discovery; the murderers having given out such threatenings against those that disapprove their proceedings, that the whole country seems to be in terror, and no one dares speak what he knows; even the letters from thence are unsigned, in which any dislike is expressed of the rioters.

But these announcements haven't led to any discoveries; the murderers have made such threats against anyone who disagrees with their actions that the entire country is living in fear, and no one dares to speak up about what they know. Even the letters from there are unsigned when they express any disapproval of the rioters.

There are some (I am ashamed to hear it) who would extenuate the enormous wickedness of these actions, by saying, "The inhabitants of the frontiers are exasperated with the murder of their relations by the enemy Indians in the present war." It is possible; but, though this might justify their going out into the woods to seek for those enemies, and avenge upon them those murders, it can never[Pg 269] justify their turning into the heart of the country to murder their friends.

There are some (I’m ashamed to admit) who would downplay the terrible wrongness of these actions by saying, "The people living on the borders are angry about their family members being killed by enemy Indians in the current war." That might be true; but while this could justify their going into the woods to find those enemies and take revenge for those murders, it can never[Pg 269] justify them going deep into the country to kill their friends.

If an Indian injures me, does it follow that I may revenge that injury on all Indians? It is well known that Indians are of different tribes, nations, and languages, as well as the white people. In Europe, if the French, who are white people, should injure the Dutch, are they to revenge it on the English, because they too are white people? The only crime of these poor wretches seems to have been, that they had a reddish-brown skin and black hair; and some people of that sort, it seems, had murdered some of our relations. If it be right to kill men for such a reason, then, should any man with a freckled face and red hair kill a wife or child of mine, it would be right for me to revenge it by killing all the freckled, red-haired men, women, and children I could afterward anywhere meet with.

If an Indian hurts me, does that mean I can take revenge on all Indians? It’s well known that Indians belong to different tribes, nations, and languages, just like white people do. In Europe, if the French, who are white, harm the Dutch, should they get revenge on the English just because they’re also white? The only crime these poor individuals seem to have committed is having a reddish-brown skin and black hair; and it appears that some people like that had killed some of our relatives. If it’s acceptable to kill men for such a reason, then if someone with a freckled face and red hair were to kill one of my family members, would it be right for me to take revenge by killing every freckled, red-haired man, woman, and child I could find afterward?

But it seems these people think they have a better justification; nothing less than the Word of God. With the Scriptures in their hands and mouths, they can set at naught that express command, Thou shalt do no murder; and justify their wickedness by the command given Joshua to destroy the heathen. Horrid perversion of Scripture and of religion! To father the worst of crimes on the God of peace and love! Even the Jews, to whom that particular commission was directed, spared the Gibeonites on account of their faith once given. The faith of this government has been frequently given to those Indians, but that did not avail them with people who despise government.

But it seems these people think they have a better justification; nothing less than the Word of God. With the Scriptures in their hands and mouths, they can disregard that clear command, Thou shalt do no murder; and justify their wrongdoings by referring to the command given to Joshua to destroy the heathens. It's a terrible misuse of Scripture and religion! To attribute the worst crimes to the God of peace and love! Even the Jews, to whom that specific command was directed, spared the Gibeonites because of their faith once promised. This government has often made commitments to those Indians, but that didn’t matter to people who disregard government.

We pretend to be Christians, and, from the superior light we enjoy, ought to exceed heathens, Turks, Saracens, Moors, negroes, and Indians in the knowledge and practice of what is right. I will endeavour to show, by a few examples from books and history, the sense those people have had of such actions.[Pg 270]

We claim to be Christians, and from the greater understanding we have, we should surpass non-believers, Turks, Saracens, Moors, Black people, and Indians in knowing and doing what is right. I'll try to demonstrate, through a few examples from books and history, how those people have viewed such actions.[Pg 270]

Homer wrote his poem, called the Odyssey, some hundred years before the birth of Christ. He frequently speaks of what he calls not only the duties, but the sacred rites of hospitality, exercised towards strangers while in our house or territory, as including, besides all the common circumstances of entertainment, full safety and protection of person from all danger of life, from all injuries, and even insults. The rites of hospitality were called sacred, because the stranger, the poor, and the weak, when they applied for protection and relief, were, from the religion of those times, supposed to be sent by the Deity to try the goodness of men, and that he would avenge the injuries they might receive, where they ought to have been protected. These sentiments, therefore, influenced the manners of all ranks of people, even the meanest; for we find, that when Ulysses came as a poor stranger to the hut of Eumæus the swineherd, and his great dogs ran out to tear the ragged man, Eumæus drove them away with stones; and

Homer wrote his poem, called the Odyssey, around a hundred years before the birth of Christ. He often talks about what he refers to not just as the duties, but also the sacred rites of hospitality, shown to strangers in our homes or lands, which include, in addition to all the usual aspects of entertaining, complete safety and protection from any life-threatening dangers, injuries, and even insults. The rites of hospitality were considered sacred because when a stranger, the poor, or the vulnerable sought shelter and aid, they were thought to be sent by the Deity to test the kindness of humans, and he would seek justice for any harm they faced where they should have been safe. These beliefs, therefore, shaped the behavior of all social classes, even the lowest; for example, when Ulysses arrived as a poor stranger at the hut of Eumæus the swineherd, and his fierce dogs ran out to attack the ragged man, Eumæus drove them away with stones; and

“‘Unhappy stranger!’ (so the faithful shepherd
Began, with a kind and gentle tone),
‘What sorrow would have been mine, if at my door,
Your honorable age had faced a disgraceful fate!
But come into my humble home and see
That our woods are not lacking in hospitality.’
He said, and supporting the kind invitation,
With a friendly step led the unknown guest;
A soft goat's hide spread beneath him,
And a generous bed made with fresh rushes.
Joy filled the hero’s tender heart, to find
Such a warm welcome from a kind soul;
And ‘Oh, ye gods, may all your blessings grace’
(He exclaimed) ‘this friend of humanity!’
The shepherd replied: ‘It was never our way
To disregard the poor, or shun anything humane.
For Jove opens the welcoming door,
It is Jove who sends the strangers and the needy.’”

These heathen people thought that, after a breach of the rites of hospitality, a curse from Heaven[Pg 271] would attend them in everything they did, and even their honest industry in their callings would fail of success. Thus when Ulysses tells Eumæus, who doubted the truth of what he related, "If I deceive you in this, I should deserve death, and I consent that you should put me to death;" Eumæus rejects the proposal, as what would be attended with both infamy and misfortune, saying ironically,

These pagan people believed that, after breaking the rules of hospitality, a curse from Heaven[Pg 271] would follow them in everything they did, and even their hard work would end in failure. So when Ulysses tells Eumæus, who was skeptical about his story, "If I’m lying to you, I deserve to die, and I agree that you should kill me;" Eumæus turns down the suggestion, as it would bring both shame and bad luck, saying ironically,

"Surely, oh guest, I would receive great praise,
If, after sharing hospitality and gifts,
I didn’t taint my welcoming home with blood.
How would the gods reward my righteous efforts,
And bless the hand that harmed a stranger?
Not anymore."

Even an open enemy, in the heat of battle, throwing down his arms, submitting to the foe, and asking life and protection, was supposed to acquire an immediate right to that protection. Thus one describes his being saved when his party was defeated:

Even an open enemy, in the heat of battle, laying down his weapons, surrendering to the opponent, and pleading for his life and protection, was believed to immediately gain the right to that protection. This is how one describes his rescue when his side was defeated:

"We ran away; the revenge spread
All around, and piles of bodies lie dead.
I took off my shining helmet,
And there, on the ground, I dropped my shield and spear,
I approached the king with a pleading expression,
Reaching his chariot, and clung to his knees.
He listened, he saved me, and placed me by his side;
He felt sorry for my situation and wiped my tears;
He held back the anger of the vengeful enemy,
And turned the deadly weapons away from me.
Devoted to protecting the sacred guest right,
And fearing Jove, who finds joy in acts of mercy."

The suiters of Penelope are, by the same ancient poet, described as a set of lawless men, who were regardless of the sacred rites of hospitality. And, therefore, when the queen was informed they were slain, and that by Ulysses, she, not believing that Ulysses was returned, says,

The suitors of Penelope are, by the same ancient poet, described as a group of lawless men who had no respect for the sacred rites of hospitality. And so, when the queen was told they were killed, and that it was by Ulysses, she, not believing that Ulysses had returned, says,

"Oh no! Some god decided the suitors' fates,
A god comes down, and they meet their end;[Pg 272]
Blindly dismissing the stranger's rightful claim
And breaking all the rules of hospitality!
... They challenged the powers;
But Heaven is fair, and a god brought their demise."

Thus much for the sentiments of the ancient heathens. As for the Turks, it is recorded in the Life of Mohammed, the founder of their religion, that Khaled, one of his captains, having divided a number of prisoners between himself and those that were with him, he commanded the hands of his own prisoners to be tied behind them, and then, in a most cruel and brutal manner, put them to the sword; but he could not prevail on his men to massacre their captives, because, in fight, they had laid down their arms, submitted, and demanded protection. Mohammed, when the account was brought to him, applauded the men for their humanity; but said to Khaled, with great indignation, "Oh Khaled, thou butcher, cease to molest me with thy wickedness. If thou possessedst a heap of gold as large as Mount Obod, and shouldst expend it all in God's cause, thy merit would not efface the guilt incurred by the murder of the meanest of these poor captives."

Thus much for the views of the ancient pagans. As for the Turks, it's noted in the Life of Mohammed, the founder of their faith, that Khaled, one of his captains, divided a group of prisoners between himself and his men. He ordered that the hands of his own prisoners be tied behind their backs, and then, in a brutal and cruel way, killed them. However, he couldn't convince his men to execute their captives because, during the battle, they had laid down their arms, surrendered, and asked for protection. When Mohammed heard about this, he praised the men for their kindness but told Khaled, with great anger, "Oh Khaled, you butcher, stop troubling me with your wickedness. Even if you had a pile of gold as big as Mount Obod and spent it all in God's service, it wouldn't erase the guilt from murdering even the least of these poor captives."

Among the Arabs or Saracens, though it was lawful to put to death a prisoner taken in battle, if he had made himself obnoxious by his former wickedness, yet this could not be done after he had once eaten bread or drunk water while in their hands. Hence we read in the history of the wars of the Holy Land, that when the Franks had suffered a great defeat from Saladin, and among the prisoners were the King of Jerusalem, and Arnold, a famous Christian captain, who had been very cruel to the Saracens; these two being brought before the sultan, he placed the king on his right hand and Arnold on his left, and then presented the king with a cup of water, who immediately drank to Arnold; but when Arnold was about to receive the cup, the sultan interrupted, saying, "I will not suffer this wicked[Pg 273] man to drink, as that, according to the laudable and generous custom of the Arabs, would secure him his life."

Among the Arabs or Saracens, while it was acceptable to execute a prisoner captured in battle if he had previously done something objectionable, this couldn't happen after he had shared a meal or drunk water while in their custody. Thus, we find in the history of the wars in the Holy Land that after the Franks faced a significant defeat by Saladin, the King of Jerusalem and Arnold, a well-known Christian leader who had been very cruel to the Saracens, were among the prisoners. When they were brought before the sultan, he placed the king on his right and Arnold on his left, and then offered the king a cup of water, which he promptly drank while toasting Arnold. However, when Arnold was about to take the cup, the sultan intervened, saying, "I will not allow this wicked[Pg 273] man to drink, as doing so, according to the admirable and noble custom of the Arabs, would ensure his life."

That the same laudable and generous custom still prevails among the Mohammedans, appears from the account, but last year published, of his travels by Mr. Bell, of Antermony, who accompanied the Czar, Peter the Great, in his journey to Derbent, through Daggestan. "The religion of the Daggestans," says he, "is generally Mohammedan, some following the sect of Osman, others that of Haly. Their language, for the most part, is Turkish, or, rather, a dialect of the Arabic, though many of them speak also the Persian language. One article I cannot omit concerning their laws of hospitality, which is, if their greatest enemy comes under their roof for protection, the landlord, of what condition soever, is obliged to keep him safe from all manner of harm or violence during his abode with him, and even to conduct him safely through his territories to a place of security."

That the same admirable and generous custom still exists among Muslims is evident from the account, published just last year, of Mr. Bell of Antermony, who traveled with Czar Peter the Great on his journey to Derbent through Dagestan. "The religion of the Dagestanis," he notes, "is mainly Islamic, with some adhering to the sect of Osman and others to that of Ali. Their language is mostly Turkish, or rather a dialect of Arabic, although many also speak Persian. One point I must mention about their hospitality laws is that if their biggest enemy seeks refuge under their roof, the host, regardless of their status, is bound to protect him from any harm or violence during his stay and even to escort him safely through his lands to a secure location."

From the Saracens this same custom obtained among the Moors of Africa; was by them brought into Spain, and there long sacredly observed. The Spanish historians record with applause one famous instance of it. While the Moors governed there, and the Spanish mixed with them, a Spanish cavalier, in a sudden quarrel, slew a young Moorish gentleman, and fled. His pursuers soon lost sight of him, for he had, unperceived, thrown himself over a garden wall. The owner, a Moor, happening to be in his garden, was addressed by the Spaniard on his knees, who acquainted him with his case, and implored concealment. "Eat this," said the Moor, giving him half a peach; "you now know that you may confide in my protection." He then locked him up in his garden apartment, telling him that, as soon as it was night, he would provide for his escape to a place of more safety. The Moor[Pg 274] then went into his house, where he had scarce seated himself when a great crowd, with loud lamentations, came to the gate bringing the corpse of his son, that had just been killed by a Spaniard. When the first shock of surprise was a little over, he learned, from the description given, that the fatal deed was done by the person then in his power. He mentioned this to no one; but, as soon as it was dark, retired to his garden apartment, as if to grieve alone, giving orders that none should follow him. There accosting the Spaniard, he said, "Christian, the person you have killed is my son; his body is in my house. You ought to suffer; but you have eaten with me, and I have given you my faith, which must not be broken. Follow me." He then led the astonished Spaniard to his stables, mounted him on one of his fleetest horses, and said, "Fly far while the night can cover you. You will be safe in the morning. You are, indeed, guilty of my son's blood; but God is just and good, and I thank him that I am innocent of yours, and that my faith given is preserved."

From the Saracens, this same custom spread among the Moors of Africa; they brought it to Spain, where it was long respected. Spanish historians celebrate one famous instance of this. While the Moors ruled and the Spanish mingled with them, a Spanish knight, in a sudden fight, killed a young Moorish gentleman and ran away. His pursuers quickly lost track of him, as he had quietly jumped over a garden wall. The owner, a Moor, happened to be in his garden and was approached by the Spaniard on his knees, who explained his situation and begged for hiding. "Eat this," said the Moor, handing him half a peach; "now you know you can trust in my protection." He then locked him in his garden room, promising to help him escape to a safer place as soon as night fell. The Moor[Pg 274] then returned to his house, barely taking a seat when a large crowd, wailing loudly, arrived at the gate carrying the body of his son, who had just been killed by a Spaniard. Once the initial shock wore off, he learned, from the description given, that the deadly act was committed by the very person he was sheltering. He told no one, but as soon as it was dark, he went back to his garden room, pretending to grieve alone, instructing that no one should follow him. There, he confronted the Spaniard, saying, "Christian, the person you killed is my son; his body is in my house. You should be punished; however, you ate with me, and I have given you my word, which must not be broken. Follow me." He then led the astonished Spaniard to his stables, put him on one of his fastest horses, and said, "Run far while the night can hide you. You will be safe in the morning. You are indeed guilty of my son's blood; but God is just and good, and I thank Him that I am innocent of yours, and that my word is kept."

The Spaniards caught from the Moors this punto of honour, the effects of which remain, in a degree, to this day. So that, when there is fear of a war about to break out between England and Spain, an English merchant there, who apprehends the confiscation of his goods as the goods of an enemy, thinks them safe if he can get a Spaniard to take charge of them; for the Spaniard secures them as his own, and faithfully redelivers them, or pays the value whenever the Englishman can safely demand it.

The Spaniards picked up this punto of honor from the Moors, and its effects still linger to some extent today. So, when there's a fear of a war about to break out between England and Spain, an English merchant in Spain, worried about losing his goods because they might be seen as the property of an enemy, feels his valuables are safe if he can find a Spaniard to look after them. The Spaniard will protect the goods as if they were his own and will either return them faithfully or pay their worth whenever the Englishman can safely ask for them back.

Justice to that nation, though lately our enemies and hardly yet our cordial friends, obliges me, on this occasion, not to omit mentioning an instance of Spanish honour, which cannot but be still fresh in the memory of many yet living. In 1746, when we were in hot war with Spain, the Elizabeth, of[Pg 275] London, Captain William Edwards, coming through the Gulf from Jamaica, richly laden, met with a most violent storm, in which the ship sprung a leak, that obliged them, for the saving of their lives, to run her into the Havana. The captain went on shore, directly waited on the governor, told the occasion of his putting in, and that he surrendered his ship as a prize, and himself and his men as prisoners of war, only requesting good quarter. "No, sir," replied the Spanish governor; "if we had taken you in fair war at sea, or approaching our coast with hostile intentions, your ship would then have been a prize, and your people prisoners. But when, distressed by a tempest, you come into our ports for the safety of your lives, we, though enemies, being men, are bound as such, by the laws of humanity, to afford relief to distressed men who ask it of us. We cannot, even against our enemies, take advantage of an act of God. You have leave, therefore, to unload the ship, if that be necessary to stop the leak; you may refit here, and traffic so far as shall be necessary to pay the charges; you may then depart, and I will give you a pass, to be in force till you are beyond Bermuda. If after that you are taken, you will then be a prize; but now you are only a stranger, and have a stranger's right to safety and protection." The ship accordingly departed and arrived safe in London.

Justice to that nation, even though they were recently our enemies and not yet our true friends, compels me, on this occasion, to mention a notable example of Spanish honor that must still be fresh in the memory of many who are alive today. In 1746, while we were at war with Spain, the Elizabeth, from [Pg 275] London, under Captain William Edwards, was returning from Jamaica when a severe storm hit, causing the ship to spring a leak. To save their lives, they had to dock in Havana. The captain went ashore, immediately met with the governor, explained why he had come, and surrendered his ship as a prize, along with himself and his crew as prisoners of war, only asking for fair treatment. "No, sir," replied the Spanish governor. "If we had captured you in open battle at sea or if you were approaching our coast with hostile intent, then your ship would be a prize and your crew prisoners. But when you seek refuge in our ports to save your lives from a storm, we, despite being enemies, as fellow humans, are obliged by the laws of humanity to assist those in distress who request it. We cannot exploit an act of God against our enemies. Therefore, you are allowed to unload your ship if that’s necessary to stop the leak; you can repair it here and conduct trade to cover your expenses; then you may leave, and I will provide you with a pass that will be valid until you are beyond Bermuda. If you are captured after that, you would then be a prize; but for now, you are simply a stranger, and you have the rights of a stranger to safety and protection." The ship then departed and arrived safely in London.

Will it be permitted me to adduce, on this occasion, an instance of the like honour in a poor, unenlightened African negro. I find it in Captain Seagrave's account of his Voyage to Guinea. He relates, that a New-England sloop, trading there in 1752, left their second mate, William Murray, sick on shore, and sailed without him. Murray was at the house of a black, named Cudjoe, with whom he had contracted an acquaintance during their trade. He recovered, and the sloop being gone, he continued with his black friend till some other opportunity[Pg 276] should offer of his getting home. In the mean while, a Dutch ship came into the road, and some of the blacks, going on board her, were treacherously seized and carried off as slaves. Their relations and friends, transported with sudden rage, ran to the house of Cudjoe to take revenge by killing Murray. Cudjoe stopped them at the door, and demanded what they wanted. "The white men," said they, "have carried away our brothers and sons, and we will kill all white men; give us the white man you keep in your house, for we will kill him." "Nay," said Cudjoe, "the white men that carried away your brothers are bad men; kill them when you can catch them; but this white man is a good man, and you must not kill him." "But he is a white man," they cried; "the white men are all bad, and we will kill them all." "Nay," said he, "you must not kill a man that has done no harm, only for being white. This man is my friend, my house is his fort, and I am his soldier. I must fight for him. You must kill me before you can kill him. What good man will ever come again under my roof if I let my floor be stained with a good man's blood!" The negroes, seeing his resolution, and being convinced, by his discourse, that they were wrong, went away ashamed. In a few days Murray ventured abroad again with Cudjoe, when several of them took him by the hand, and told him they were glad they had not killed him; for, as he was a good (meaning an innocent) man, their God would have been angry, and would have spoiled their fishing. "I relate this," says Captain Seagrave, "to show that some among these dark people have a strong sense of justice and honour, and that even the most brutal among them are capable of feeling the force of reason, and of being influenced by a fear of God (if the knowledge of the true God could be introduced among them), since even[Pg 277] the fear of a false God, when their rage subsided, was not without its good effect."

Will I be allowed to present an example of the same kind of honor in a poor, uneducated African man? I found it in Captain Seagrave's account of his Voyage to Guinea. He tells the story of a New England sloop that was trading there in 1752, which left their second mate, William Murray, sick on shore and sailed without him. Murray was at the home of a black man named Cudjoe, with whom he had formed a friendship during their trade. He got better, and since the sloop had left, he stayed with his black friend until another opportunity[Pg 276] came along for him to get home. In the meantime, a Dutch ship arrived in the harbor, and some of the local men who went on board were treacherously captured and taken away as slaves. Their relatives and friends, filled with sudden anger, rushed to Cudjoe's house to take revenge by killing Murray. Cudjoe stopped them at the door and asked what they wanted. "The white men," they said, "have taken our brothers and sons, and we will kill all white men; give us the white man you have in your house, so we can kill him." "No," said Cudjoe, "the white men who took your brothers are bad men; kill them when you catch them; but this white man is a good man, and you must not kill him." "But he’s a white man," they shouted; "all white men are bad, and we will kill them all." "No," he replied, "you should not kill a man who has done nothing wrong just because he is white. This man is my friend, my home is his shelter, and I am his protector. I must fight for him. You have to kill me before you can kill him. What good man will ever come back under my roof if I allow a good man's blood to stain my floor!" The men, seeing his determination and realizing through his words that they were in the wrong, walked away embarrassed. A few days later, Murray ventured out again with Cudjoe, and several of the men shook his hand, telling him they were glad they hadn’t killed him; because he was a good (meaning innocent) man, their God would have been angry and would have ruined their fishing. "I share this," says Captain Seagrave, "to show that some among these dark people have a strong sense of justice and honor, and that even the most brutal among them can be swayed by reason and influenced by a fear of God (if the knowledge of the true God could be brought to them), since even[Pg 277] the fear of a false God, when their anger calmed, had a positive effect."

Now I am about to mention something of Indians, I beg that I may not be understood as framing apologies for all Indians. I am far from desiring to lessen the laudable spirit of resentment in my countrymen against those now at war with us, so far as it is justified by their perfidy and inhumanity. I would only observe, that the Six Nations, as a body, have kept faith with the English ever since we knew them, now near a hundred years; and that the governing part of those people have had notions of honour, whatever may be the case of the rum-debauched, trader-corrupted vagabonds and thieves on the Susquehanna and Ohio at present in arms against us. As a proof of that honour, I shall only mention one well-known recent fact. When six Catawba deputies, under the care of Colonel Bull, of Charlestown, went, by permission, into the Mohawk's country to sue for, and treat of peace for their nation, they soon found the Six Nations highly exasperated, and the peace at that time impracticable. They were therefore in fear of their own persons, and apprehended that they should be killed in their way back to New-York; which, being made known to the Mohawk chiefs by Colonel Bull, one of them, by order of the council, made this speech to the Catawbas:

Now I’m about to talk about the Indians, and I hope I’m not seen as making excuses for all Indians. I certainly don’t want to diminish the justified anger my fellow countrymen feel towards those currently at war with us, given their betrayal and cruelty. I just want to point out that the Six Nations have remained loyal to the English for nearly a hundred years since we’ve known them, and the leaders of those people have had a sense of honor, unlike the drunken, corrupt traders and thieves from the Susquehanna and Ohio who are currently fighting against us. To illustrate that honor, I'll mention one well-known recent event. When six Catawba deputies, accompanied by Colonel Bull from Charlestown, were allowed to enter Mohawk territory to negotiate peace for their nation, they quickly realized that the Six Nations were very upset, and peace was not possible at that moment. As a result, they feared for their safety and thought they might be killed on their journey back to New York. This concern was communicated to the Mohawk chiefs by Colonel Bull, and one of them, on behalf of the council, delivered this speech to the Catawbas:

"Strangers and Enemies,

"Strangers and Adversaries,"

"While you are in this country, blow away all fear out of your breasts; change the black streak of paint on your cheeks for a red one, and let your faces shine with bear's grease. You are safer here than if you were at home. The Six Nations will not defile their own land with the blood of men that come unarmed to ask for peace. We shall send a guard with you, to see you safe out of our territories. So far you shall have peace, but no farther. Get home to your own country, and there take care[Pg 278] of yourselves, for there we intend to come and kill you."

"While you're in this country, shake off all your fears; replace the dark paint on your cheeks with a red one, and let your faces shine with bear grease. You're safer here than you would be at home. The Six Nations won’t spill the blood of unarmed men who come seeking peace on their own land. We’ll send a guard with you to ensure you safely leave our territory. For now, you will have peace, but no further than that. Get back to your own country, and take care of yourselves there, because that’s where we plan to come and kill you."

The Catawbas came away unhurt accordingly.

The Catawbas came away unharmed.

It is also well known, that just before the late war broke out, when our traders first went among the Piankeshaw Indians, a tribe of the Twigtwees, they found the principle of giving protection to strangers in full force; for, the French coming with their Indians to the Piankeshaw town, and demanding that those traders and their goods should be delivered up, the Piankeshaws replied, the English were come there upon their invitation, and they could not do so base a thing. But the French insisting on it, the Piankeshaws took arms in defence of their guests, and a number of them, with their old chief, lost their lives in the cause; the French at last prevailing by superior force only.

It’s also well known that just before the recent war started, when our merchants first visited the Piankeshaw Indians, a tribe of the Twigtwees, they encountered the strong principle of protecting strangers. When the French, along with their Native allies, arrived at the Piankeshaw town and demanded that the traders and their goods be handed over, the Piankeshaws responded that the English had come at their invitation and they couldn’t do anything so dishonorable. However, as the French continued to insist, the Piankeshaws took up arms to defend their guests, and several of them, along with their elderly chief, lost their lives in the fight. Ultimately, the French prevailed only because of their greater strength.

I will not dissemble that numberless stories have been raised and spread abroad, against not only the poor wretches that are murdered, but also against the hundred and forty Christianized Indians still threatened to be murdered; all which stories are well known, by those who know the Indians best, to be pure inventions, contrived by bad people, either to excite each other to join in the murder, or, since it was committed, to justify it, and believed only by the weak and credulous. I call thus publicly on the makers and venders of these accusations to produce their evidence. Let them satisfy the public that even Will Soc, the most obnoxious of all that tribe, was really guilty of those offences against us which they lay to his charge. But, if he was, ought he not to have been fairly tried? He lived under our laws, and was subject to them; he was in our hands, and might easily have been prosecuted; was it English justice to condemn and execute him unheard? Conscious of his own innocence, he did not endeavour to hide himself when the door of the workhouse, his sanctuary, was[Pg 279] breaking open. "I will meet them," says he, "for they are my brothers." These brothers of his shot him down at the door, while the word "brothers" was between his teeth.

I won't pretend that countless stories have been created and spread, not just against the poor victims who were murdered, but also against the hundred and forty Christianized Indians who are still at risk of being murdered. Everyone who knows the Indians best understands that these stories are outright fabrications, made up by bad people either to encourage each other to join in the murder or, after it happened, to justify it, and they’re only believed by the gullible and easily deceived. I’m publicly calling on those who make and spread these accusations to provide their evidence. Let them prove to the public that even Will Soc, the most disliked of that group, was genuinely guilty of the offenses they accuse him of. But if he was guilty, shouldn’t he have been given a fair trial? He lived under our laws and was subject to them; he was within our reach, and we could have easily prosecuted him. Was it really English justice to condemn and execute him without hearing his side? Aware of his own innocence, he didn’t try to hide when the door of the workhouse, his refuge, was being broken down. "I will meet them," he said, "for they are my brothers." Those brothers shot him down at the door while he was still speaking the word "brothers."

But if Will Soc was a bad man, what had poor old Shehaes done? What could he or the other poor old men and women do? What had little boys and girls done! What could children of a year old, babes at the breast, what could they do, that they too must be shot and hatcheted? Horrid to relate! And in their parents' arms! This is done by no civilized nation in Europe. Do we come to America to learn and practise the manners of barbarians? But this, barbarians as they are, they practice against their enemies only, not against their friends. These poor people have been always our friends. Their fathers received ours, when strangers here, with kindness and hospitality. Behold the return we have made them! When we grew more numerous and powerful, they put themselves under our protection. See, in the mangled corpses of the last remains of the tribe, how effectually we have afforded it to them.

But if Will Soc was a bad person, what had poor old Shehaes done? What could he or the other poor old men and women do? What had little boys and girls done? What could children just a year old, babies still nursing, what could they have done to deserve being shot and hacked to death? It’s horrible to talk about! And in their parents' arms! No civilized nation in Europe commits such acts. Did we come to America to learn and practice the ways of savages? Even these savages, as they are, only act against their enemies, not their friends. These poor people have always been our friends. Their fathers welcomed ours, when they were strangers here, with kindness and hospitality. Look at the gratitude we've shown them! When we became more numerous and powerful, they placed themselves under our protection. Just look at the mangled bodies of the last remaining members of their tribe, and see how effectively we've provided that protection.

Unhappy people! to have lived in such times and by such neighbours. We have seen that they would have been safer among the ancient heathens, with whom the rites of hospitality were sacred. They would have been considered as guests of the public, and the religion of the country would have operated in their favour. But our frontier people call themselves Christians! They would have been safer if they had submitted to the Turks; for ever since Mohammed's reproof to Khaled, even the cruel Turks never kill prisoners in cold blood. These were not even prisoners. But what is the example of Turks to Scripture Christians! They would have been safer, though they had been taken in actual war against the Saracens, if they had once drank water with them. These were not taken in[Pg 280] war against us, and have drunk with us, and we with them, for fourscore years. But shall we compare Saracens to Christians?

Unhappy people! To have lived in such times and among such neighbors. We've seen that they would have been safer among the ancient pagans, where the rules of hospitality were sacred. They would have been treated as guests of the public, and the religion of the land would have worked in their favor. But our frontier folks call themselves Christians! They would have been safer if they had submitted to the Turks; ever since Mohammed's reprimand to Khaled, even the cruel Turks never kill prisoners in cold blood. These weren't even prisoners. But what does the example of the Turks mean to Scripture Christians! They would have been safer even if they were captured in actual battle against the Saracens, as long as they had shared a drink with them. These weren’t taken in[Pg 280] war against us, and have shared drinks with us, and we with them, for eighty years. But can we really compare Saracens to Christians?

They would have been safer among the Moors in Spain, though they had been murderers of sons, if faith had once been pledged to them, and a promise of protection given. But these have had the faith of the English given to them many times by the government, and, in reliance on that faith, they lived among us, and gave us the opportunity of murdering them. However, what was honourable in Moors may not be a rule to us; for we are Christians! They would have been safer, it seems, among popish Spaniards, even if enemies, and delivered into their hands by a tempest. These were not enemies; they were born among us, and yet we have killed them all. But shall we imitate idolatrous papists, we that are enlightened Protestants? They would even have been safer among the negroes of Africa, where at least one manly soul would have been found, with sense, spirit, and humanity enough to stand in their defence. But shall white men and Christians act like a pagan negro? In short, it appears that they would have been safe in any part of the known world, except in the neighbourhood of the Christian white savages of Peckstang and Donegall!

They would have been safer among the Moors in Spain, even though they were murderers of sons, if they had once been promised faith and protection. But the English government has given them its faith many times, and in relying on that faith, they lived among us and allowed us the chance to murder them. However, what was honorable for the Moors may not apply to us, because we are Christians! It seems they would have been safer among the Catholic Spaniards, even as enemies, if delivered into their hands by a storm. These were not enemies; they were born among us, and yet we have killed them all. But should we imitate idolatrous Catholics, we who are enlightened Protestants? They would have even been safer among the Africans, where at least one brave person would have had enough sense, spirit, and humanity to defend them. But should white men and Christians act like pagan Africans? In short, it looks like they would have been safe anywhere in the known world, except near the Christian white savages of Peckstang and Donegall!

Oh ye unhappy perpetrators of this horrid wickedness! reflect a moment on the mischief ye have done, the disgrace ye have brought on your country, on your religion and your Bible, on your families and children. Think on the destruction of your captivated countryfolks (now among the wild Indians), which probably may follow, in resentment of your barbarity! Think on the wrath of the United Five Nations, hitherto our friends, but now provoked by your murdering one of their tribes, in danger of becoming our bitter enemies. Think of the mild and good government you have so audaciously[Pg 281] insulted; the laws of your king, your country, and your God, that you have broken; the infamous death that hangs over your heads; for justice, though slow, will come at last. All good people everywhere detest your actions. You have imbrued your hands in innocent blood; how will you make them clean? The dying shrieks and groans of the murdered will often sound in your ears. Their spectres will sometimes attend you, and affright even your innocent children. Fly where you will, your consciences will go with you. Talking in your sleep shall betray you; in the delirium of a fever you yourselves shall make your own wickedness known.

Oh, you miserable offenders of this terrible wrongdoing! Take a moment to reflect on the damage you've caused, the shame you've brought upon your country, your religion, your Bible, your families, and your children. Consider the destruction of your captured fellow countrymen (now among the wild Indians), which might follow in response to your cruelty! Think about the anger of the United Five Nations, who were our friends but are now provoked by your murder of one of their tribes, putting us at risk of turning into bitter enemies. Remember the kind and just government you have so boldly insulted; the laws of your king, your country, and your God that you have broken; the infamous death that looms over you; for justice, though slow, will eventually come. All good people everywhere detest your actions. You have stained your hands with innocent blood; how will you cleanse them? The dying screams and moans of the murdered will echo in your ears. Their ghosts will sometimes haunt you and frighten even your innocent children. No matter where you run, your conscience will follow you. You will betray yourself in your sleep; in the fever's delirium, you will reveal your own wickedness.

One hundred and forty peaceable Indians yet remain in this government. They have, by Christian missionaries, been brought over to a liking, at least, of our religion; some of them lately left their nation, which is now at war with us, because they did not choose to join in their depredations; and to show their confidence in us, and to give us an equal confidence in them, they have brought and put into our hands their wives and children. Others have lived long among us in Northampton county, and most of their children have been born there. These are all now trembling for their lives. They have been hurried from place to place for safety, now concealed in corners, then sent out of the province, refused a passage through a neighbouring colony, and returned, not unkindly, perhaps, but disgracefully, on our hands. Oh Pennsylvania! Once renowned for kindness to strangers, shall the clamours of a few mean niggards about the expense of this public hospitality, an expense that will not cost the noisy wretches sixpence a piece (and what is the expense of the poor maintenance we afford them, compared to the expense they might occasion if in arms against us?), shall so senseless a clamour, I say, force you to turn out of your own doors these unhappy guests,[Pg 282] who have offended their own countryfolks by their affection for you; who, confiding in your goodness, have put themselves under your protection? Those whom you have disarmed to satisfy groundless suspicions, will you leave them exposed to the armed madmen of your country? Unmanly men! who are not ashamed to come with weapons against the unarmed, to use the sword against women, and the bayonet against your children, and who have already given such bloody proofs of their inhumanity and cruelty.

One hundred and forty peaceful Native Americans still remain in this government. Through Christian missionaries, they have developed at least some acceptance of our religion; some of them recently left their nation, which is now at war with us, because they refused to take part in their violent acts. To demonstrate their trust in us and to earn our trust in return, they have handed over their wives and children to us. Others have lived among us in Northampton County for a long time, and most of their children were born there. Now, these people are all in fear for their lives. They have been moved from place to place for safety, hidden in corners, then sent out of the province, denied passage through a neighboring colony, and shamefully sent back to us. Oh Pennsylvania! Once known for its kindness to strangers, shall the complaints of a few stingy individuals about the cost of this public hospitality—an expense that won’t cost those complaining even a penny each (and what is the cost of providing for these people compared to the potential threat if they were armed against us?)—make you turn away these unfortunate guests,[Pg 282] who have upset their own people by caring for you; who, trusting in your goodness, have placed themselves under your protection? Those from whom you have taken weapons to calm unfounded fears, will you leave them vulnerable to the armed madmen of your country? Cowardly men! who aren’t ashamed to come armed against the defenseless, to use swords against women, and bayonets against your children, and who have already shown such bloody evidence of their inhumanity and cruelty.

Let us rouse ourselves for shame, and redeem the honour of our province from the contempt of its neighbours; let all good men join heartily and unanimously in support of the laws, and in strengthening the hands of government, that justice may be done, the wicked punished, and the innocent protected; otherwise we can, as a people, expect no blessing from Heaven; there will be no security for our persons or properties; anarchy and confusion will prevail over all; and violence, without judgment, dispose of everything.

Let’s wake up and take action to restore our province’s reputation and respect from our neighbors. Every decent person should come together wholeheartedly to support the laws and empower the government so that justice can be served, the guilty held accountable, and the innocent defended. If we don’t, we can’t expect any blessings from above; our safety and property will be at risk; chaos and disorder will reign, and violence will take over without any judgment.


Introduction to Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania.[22]

Introduction to Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania.[22]

To obtain an infinite variety of purposes by a few plain principles, is the characteristic of nature. As the eye is affected, so is the understanding; objects at a distance strike us according to their dimensions, or the quantity of light thrown upon them; near, according to their novelty or familiarity,[Pg 283] as they are in motion or at rest. It is the same with actions. A battle is all motion, a hero all glare: while such images are before us, we can attend to nothing else. Solon and Lycurgus would make no figure in the same scene with the king of Prussia; and we are at present so lost in the military scramble on the continent next us, in which, it must be confessed, we are deeply interested, that we have scarce time to throw a glance towards America, where we have also much at stake, and where, if anywhere, our account must be made up at last.

To achieve an endless variety of purposes from just a few simple principles is the hallmark of nature. Just as the eye is influenced, so is our understanding; distant objects catch our attention based on their size or the amount of light hitting them, while nearby objects draw our focus based on their novelty or familiarity,[Pg 283] whether they're in motion or still. The same applies to actions. A battle is full of movement, and a hero is all about spectacle: when such images are in front of us, we can’t concentrate on anything else. Solon and Lycurgus wouldn’t stand out in the same scene as the King of Prussia; and right now, we’re so caught up in the military chaos happening in the neighboring continent—something we’re undeniably invested in—that we hardly have the time to glance at America, where we also have a lot at stake, and where, if anywhere, we need to settle our accounts in the end.

We love to stare more than to reflect; and to be indolently amused at our leisure rather than commit the smallest trespass on our patience by winding a painful, tedious maze, which would pay us in nothing but knowledge.

We prefer to watch rather than think; and to casually entertain ourselves at our convenience instead of enduring even the slightest inconvenience by navigating a difficult, boring path that would only reward us with knowledge.

But then, as there are some eyes which can find nothing marvellous but what is marvellously great, so there are others which are equally disposed to marvel at what is marvellously little, and who can derive as much entertainment from their microscope in examining a mite, as Dr. —— in ascertaining the geography of the moon or measuring the tail of a comet.

But just as there are some people who can only find wonder in things that are impressively large, there are others who are just as inclined to marvel at things that are remarkably small. They can get just as much enjoyment from their microscope while examining a tiny insect as Dr. —— does from studying the geography of the moon or measuring the tail of a comet.

Let this serve as an excuse for the author of these sheets, if he needs any, for bestowing them on the transactions of a colony till of late hardly mentioned in our annals; in point of establishment one of the last upon the British list, and in point of rank one of the most subordinate; as being not only subject, in common with the rest, to the crown, but also to the claims of a proprietary, who thinks he does them honour enough in governing them by deputy; consequently so much farther removed from the royal eye, and so much the more exposed to the pressure of self-interested instructions.

Let this be an explanation for the author of these pages, if he needs one, for focusing on the activities of a colony that has only recently been mentioned in our history; in terms of establishment, it's one of the last on the British list, and in terms of rank, one of the lowest; being not only under the crown like the others, but also subject to the claims of a proprietor who believes he does them a favor by governing through a deputy; thus, they are even more distant from royal oversight and more vulnerable to the influence of self-serving orders.

Considerable, however, as most of them for happiness of situation, fertility of soil, product of valuable[Pg 284] commodities, number of inhabitants, shipping amount of exportations, latitude of rights and privileges, and every other requisite for the being and well-being of society, and more considerable than any of them all for the celerity of its growth, unassisted by any human help but the vigour and virtue of its own excellent constitution.

Considerable, however, as most of them for happiness of situation, fertility of soil, production of valuable[Pg 284] commodities, number of inhabitants, shipping volume of exports, latitude of rights and privileges, and every other requirement for the existence and well-being of society, and more significant than any of them all for the speed of its growth, unassisted by any human help but the strength and virtue of its own excellent constitution.

A father and his family, the latter united by interest and affection, the former to be revered for the wisdom of his institutions and the indulgent use of his authority, was the form it was at first presented in. Those who were only ambitious of repose, found it here; and as none returned with an evil report of the land, numbers followed, all partook of the leaven they found; the community still wore the same equal face; nobody aspired, nobody was oppressed; industry was sure of profit, knowledge of esteem, and virtue of veneration.

A father and his family, bonded by shared interests and affection, with the father respected for his wise decisions and generous use of his authority, was how it was initially presented. Those who were simply seeking peace found it here; and since no one returned with negative stories about the place, many people came, all became influenced by what they encountered; the community still had the same harmonious vibe; nobody sought to rise above others, and no one felt oppressed; hard work guaranteed rewards, knowledge brought respect, and virtue earned admiration.

An assuming landlord, strongly disposed to convert free tenants into abject vassals, and to reap what he did not sow, countenanced and abetted by a few desperate and designing dependants on the one side, and on the other, all who have sense enough to know their rights and spirit enough to defend them, combined as one man against the said landlord and his encroachments, is the form it has since assumed.

An overbearing landlord, eager to turn free tenants into miserable vassals and take credit for what he hasn’t worked for, is supported by a handful of desperate and scheming followers. On the other side are those who understand their rights and have the guts to defend them, uniting as one against the landlord and his intrusions. This is how the situation has developed since then.

And surely, to a nation born to liberty like this, bound to leave it unimpaired, as they received it from their fathers, in perpetuity to their heirs, and interested in the conservation of it in every appendage of the British empire, the particulars of such a contest cannot be wholly indifferent.

And surely, for a nation that was born free like this, obligated to pass it on unchanged, just as they received it from their ancestors, to their descendants forever, and invested in its preservation throughout every part of the British Empire, the details of such a conflict cannot be completely unimportant.

On the contrary, it is reasonable to think the first workings of power against liberty, and the natural efforts of unbiased men to secure themselves against the first approaches of oppression, must have a captivating power over every man of sensibility and discernment among us.[Pg 285]

On the contrary, it's logical to believe that the initial signs of authority rising up against freedom, and the natural attempts of fair-minded individuals to protect themselves from the first signs of oppression, must be incredibly compelling to anyone with sensitivity and insight among us.[Pg 285]

Liberty, it seems, thrives best in the woods. America best cultivates what Germany brought forth. And were it not for certain ugly comparisons, hard to be suppressed, the pleasure arising from such a research would be without alloy.

Liberty seems to flourish best in the woods. America nurtures what Germany has introduced. If it weren't for some unpleasant comparisons that are hard to ignore, the enjoyment from such exploration would be pure.

In the feuds of Florence, recorded by Machiavel, we find more to lament and less to praise. Scarce can we believe the first citizens of the ancient republics had such pretensions to consideration, though so highly celebrated in ancient story. And as to ourselves, we need no longer have recourse to the late glorious stand of the French parliaments to excite our emulation.

In the conflicts of Florence, documented by Machiavelli, there's more to mourn and less to admire. It's hard to believe that the leading citizens of the ancient republics had such claims to respect, despite being so famously honored in history. And as for us, we no longer need to look to the recent impressive efforts of the French parliaments to inspire our ambition.

It is a known custom among farmers to change their corn from season to season for the sake of filling the bushel; and in case the wisdom of the age should condescend to make the like experiment in another shape, from hence we may learn whither to repair for the proper species.

It’s a common practice among farmers to rotate their corn each season to maximize their yield; and if the knowledge of our time were to also try this in a different way, we could find out where to go for the right kind.

It is not, however, to be presumed, that such as have long been accustomed to consider the colonies in general as only so many dependencies on the council-board, the board of trade, and the board of customs; or as a hotbed for causes, jobs, and other pecuniary emoluments, and as bound as effectually by instructions as by laws, can be prevailed upon to consider these patriot rustics with any degree of respect.

It shouldn’t be assumed that those who have long viewed the colonies merely as dependencies of the council, the board of trade, and the customs board; or as a source of opportunities for profit and other financial gain, and who are just as bound by instructions as by laws, will come to regard these patriotic country folks with any respect.

Derision, on the contrary, must be the lot of him who imagines it in the power of the pen to set any lustre upon them; and indignation theirs for daring to assert and maintain the independence interwoven in their constitution, which now, it seems, is become an improper ingredient, and, therefore, to be excised away.

Derision, on the other hand, must be the fate of anyone who believes that the pen can add any shine to them; and anger is theirs for having the audacity to assert and uphold the independence woven into their constitution, which now, it seems, has become an unwelcome element and, as a result, must be cut out.

But how contemptibly soever these gentlemen may talk of the colonies, how cheap soever they may hold their assemblies, or how insignificant the[Pg 286] planters and traders who compose them, truth will be truth, and principle principle, notwithstanding.

But no matter how disrespectfully these gentlemen might speak about the colonies, how little they might regard their assemblies, or how unimportant the[Pg 286] planters and traders who make them up may seem, the truth remains the truth, and principles remain principles, regardless.

Courage, wisdom, integrity, and honour are not to be measured by the sphere assigned them to act in, but by the trials they undergo and the vouchers they furnish; and, if so manifested, need neither robes nor titles to set them off.

Courage, wisdom, integrity, and honor shouldn't be judged by the roles they're given but by the challenges they face and the proof they provide; when shown, they don't need fancy clothes or titles to stand out.


Dr. Franklin's motion for Prayers in the Convention assembled at Philadelphia, 1787, to revise the then existing Articles of Confederation.

Dr. Franklin's proposal for prayers at the Convention meeting in Philadelphia, 1787, to revise the current Articles of Confederation.

Mr. President,

Mr. President,

The small progress we have made after four or five weeks' close attendance and continual reasonings with each other, our different sentiments on almost every question, several of the last producing as many Noes as Ayes, is, methinks, a melancholy proof of the imperfection of the human understanding. We indeed seem to feel our own want of political wisdom, since we have been running all about in search of it. We have gone back to ancient history for models of government, and examined the different forms of those republics which, having been originally formed with the seeds of their own dissolution, now no longer exist; and we have viewed modern states all round Europe, but find none of their constitutions suitable to our circumstances.

The small progress we’ve made after four or five weeks of close discussions and constant reasoning with each other, given that we have different opinions on almost every question, with a few of the recent votes resulting in just as many Noes as Ayes, is, I think, a sad reflection on the limitations of human understanding. We really seem to feel our own lack of political wisdom, especially since we’ve been searching everywhere for it. We’ve looked back to ancient history for examples of government and studied the various republics, which were originally set up with the seeds of their own downfall and no longer exist; and we’ve examined modern states across Europe, but we find none of their systems suitable for our situation.

In this situation of this Assembly, groping, as it were, in the dark, to find political truth, and scarce able to distinguish it when presented to us, how has it happened, sir, that we have not hitherto once thought of humbly applying to the Father of Lights to illuminate our understandings? In the beginning of the contest with Britain, when we were[Pg 287] sensible of danger, we had daily prayers in this room for the Divine protection! Our prayers, sir, were heard; and they were graciously answered. All of us who were engaged in the struggle must have observed frequent instances of a superintending Providence in our favour. To that kind Providence we owe this happy opportunity of consulting in peace on the means of establishing our future national felicity. And have we now forgotten that powerful friend? or do we imagine we no longer need its assistance? I have lived, sir, a long time: and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, That God governs in the affairs of men! And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid? We have been assured, sir, in the Sacred Writings, that "except the Lord build the house, they labour in vain that build it." I firmly believe this; and I also believe, that without his concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the building of Babel: we shall be divided by our little partial local interests, our projects will be confounded, and we ourselves shall become a reproach and a byword down to future ages. And, what is worse, mankind may hereafter, from this unfortunate instance, despair of establishing government by human wisdom, and leave it to chance, war, and conquest.

In this Assembly, feeling around in the dark to find political truth, and barely able to recognize it when it's presented to us, how is it that we haven't thought about humbly asking the Father of Lights to enlighten our minds? At the start of our struggle with Britain, when we were [Pg 287] aware of the danger, we held daily prayers in this room for Divine protection! Our prayers, sir, were heard and graciously answered. All of us involved in the struggle must have noticed numerous instances of a guiding Providence in our favor. To that kind Providence, we owe this wonderful chance to peacefully discuss how to secure our future happiness as a nation. Have we now forgotten that powerful friend? Or do we think we no longer need its help? I have lived a long time, sir, and the longer I live, the more convincing evidence I see of this truth, That God governs in the affairs of men! If a sparrow can't fall to the ground without his notice, is it likely that an empire can rise without his support? We have been reminded in the Sacred Writings that "unless the Lord builds the house, the builders labor in vain." I firmly believe this, and I also believe that without his help, our efforts to establish this political structure will be no better than the building of Babel: we will be divided by our small local interests, our plans will be confused, and we will become a disgrace and a cautionary tale for future generations. What’s worse, humanity might come to lose hope in the possibility of establishing government through human wisdom, leaving it to chance, war, and conquest.

I therefore beg leave to move,

I would like to request permission to proceed,

That henceforth prayers, imploring the assistance of Heaven and its blessing on our deliberations, be held in this Assembly every morning before we proceed to business; and that one or more of the clergy of this city be requested to officiate in that service.

That from now on, prayers asking for help from Heaven and blessings on our discussions will be held in this Assembly every morning before we start our work; and that one or more clergy members from this city be asked to lead that service.

[Note by Dr. Franklin.]—"The Convention, except three or four persons, thought prayers unnecessary!!"

[Note by Dr. Franklin.]—"The Convention, except for three or four people, thought prayers were unnecessary!!"


END OF VOL. I.

END OF VOL. 1.

FOOTNOTES:

[18] The following appears to be the history of this celebrated Act:

[18] Here’s the history of this well-known Act:

Until 1763, whenever Great Britain wanted supplies directly from the colonies, the secretary of state, in the king's name, sent them a letter of requisition, in which the occasion for the supplies was expressed; and the colonies returned a free gift, the mode of levying which they wholly prescribed. At this period the chancellor of the exchequer (Mr. George Grenville) says to the House of Commons, "We must call for money from the colonies in the way of a tax;" and to the colony-agents, "Write to your several colonies, and tell them, if they dislike a duty upon stamps, and prefer any other method of raising the money themselves, I shall be content, provided the amount be but raised." "That is," observed the colonies, when commenting upon his terms, "if we will not tax ourselves as we may be directed, the Parliament will tax us." Dr. Franklin's instructions, spoken of above, related to this gracious option. As the colonies could not choose "another tax" while they disclaimed every tax, the Parliament passed the stamp-act.

Until 1763, whenever Great Britain needed supplies directly from the colonies, the secretary of state, on behalf of the king, sent a requisition letter outlining the need for the supplies. The colonies responded with a free gift, which they fully decided how to collect. At this time, the chancellor of the exchequer (Mr. George Grenville) told the House of Commons, "We must ask for money from the colonies in the form of a tax;" and to the colony agents, he said, "Write to your various colonies and let them know that if they don't like a duty on stamps, and would rather find another way to raise the money themselves, I will be satisfied, as long as the amount is raised." The colonies responded to his terms with, "In other words, if we don't tax ourselves as directed, Parliament will tax us." Dr. Franklin's instructions mentioned above referred to this gracious option. Since the colonies couldn't choose "another tax" while rejecting every tax, Parliament passed the stamp act.

This act declared that the Americans should have no commerce, make no exchange of property with each other, neither purchase, nor grant, nor recover debts; they shall neither marry nor make their wills, unless they pay such and such sums in specie for the stamps which must give validity to the proceedings. The operation of such a tax, its annual productiveness, on its introduction, was estimated by its proposer in the House of Commons at 100,000l. sterling. The colonies being already reduced to the necessity of having paper money, by sending to Britain the specie they collected in foreign trade, in order to make up for the deficiency of their other returns for Britain's manufactures; there were doubts whether there could remain specie sufficient to answer the tax.

This law stated that Americans couldn't do business, trade property with each other, buy, grant, or recover debts; they couldn't marry or write wills unless they paid certain amounts in cash for the stamps that would make these actions valid. The expected annual revenue from this tax, when it was introduced, was estimated by its sponsor in the House of Commons to be £100,000. Since the colonies were already forced to rely on paper money by sending the cash they collected from foreign trade back to Britain to make up for the shortage in other returns for British goods, there were concerns about whether there would be enough cash left to cover the tax.

[19] Some of the colonies had been reduced to the necessity of bartering, from the want of a medium of traffic.

[19] Some of the colonies were forced to trade goods directly because they lacked a currency for transactions.

[20] Afterward expressed in the Declaratory Act.

[20] Later stated in the Declaratory Act.

[21] When this army was in the utmost distress from the want of wagons, &c., our author and his son voluntarily traversed the country, in order to collect a sufficient quantity; and effected their purpose, by pledging himself to the amount of many thousand pounds, for payment. It was but just before Dr. Franklin's last return from England to America that the accounts in this transaction were passed at the British treasury.

[21] When this army was in severe trouble due to a shortage of wagons and other supplies, our author and his son willingly traveled across the country to gather enough resources. They achieved this by agreeing to pledge themselves for the payment of several thousand pounds. It was shortly before Dr. Franklin's final return from England to America that the records of this transaction were settled at the British treasury.

[22] The publication of this work by Doctor Franklin was made in London during the war that begun in 1773. The introduction is a model of vivid style and sound wisdom. It is written as in London.

[22] Doctor Franklin published this work in London during the war that started in 1773. The introduction showcases a bright style and solid insight. It’s written as if in London.


Transcriber's Notes

Transcription Notes

The transcriber made these changes to the text to correct obvious errors:

The transcriber made these changes to the text to fix obvious mistakes:

1.  p  35  obnoxious
2.  p. 53  expectations
3.  p. 84  fifteen
4.  p. 105 9. Moderation.
5.  p. 125 retaliating
6.  p. 162 Virginia
7.  p. 226 with more lustre
8.  p. 250 object
9.  p. 275 a leak
10. p. 280 perpetrators
11. p. 285 dependencies
12. p. 287 succeed




        
        
    
Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!