This is a modern-English version of A Journal of the Plague Year: Being Observations or Memorials of the Most Remarkable Occurrences, as Well Public as Private, Which Happened in London During the Last Great Visitation in 1665. Written by a Citizen Who Continued All the While in London, originally written by Defoe, Daniel. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.

A Journal of the Plague Year

by Daniel Defoe

being Observations or Memorials
of the most remarkable occurrences,
as well public as private, which happened in
London during the last great visitation in 1665.
Written by a CITIZEN who continued
all the while in London.
Never made publick before

It was about the beginning of September, 1664, that I, among the rest of my neighbours, heard in ordinary discourse that the plague was returned again in Holland; for it had been very violent there, and particularly at Amsterdam and Rotterdam, in the year 1663, whither, they say, it was brought, some said from Italy, others from the Levant, among some goods which were brought home by their Turkey fleet; others said it was brought from Candia; others from Cyprus. It mattered not from whence it came; but all agreed it was come into Holland again.

It was around the beginning of September 1664 when I, along with my neighbors, heard in casual conversation that the plague had returned to Holland. It had been very severe there, especially in Amsterdam and Rotterdam, in 1663. Some people said it came from Italy, while others thought it originated from the Levant with goods brought back by their Turkey fleet. Some claimed it was brought from Candia or Cyprus. The source didn’t really matter; everyone agreed it was back in Holland.

We had no such thing as printed newspapers in those days to spread rumours and reports of things, and to improve them by the invention of men, as I have lived to see practised since. But such things as these were gathered from the letters of merchants and others who corresponded abroad, and from them was handed about by word of mouth only; so that things did not spread instantly over the whole nation, as they do now. But it seems that the Government had a true account of it, and several councils were held about ways to prevent its coming over; but all was kept very private. Hence it was that this rumour died off again, and people began to forget it as a thing we were very little concerned in, and that we hoped was not true; till the latter end of November or the beginning of December 1664 when two men, said to be Frenchmen, died of the plague in Long Acre, or rather at the upper end of Drury Lane. The family they were in endeavoured to conceal it as much as possible, but as it had gotten some vent in the discourse of the neighbourhood, the Secretaries of State got knowledge of it; and concerning themselves to inquire about it, in order to be certain of the truth, two physicians and a surgeon were ordered to go to the house and make inspection. This they did; and finding evident tokens of the sickness upon both the bodies that were dead, they gave their opinions publicly that they died of the plague. Whereupon it was given in to the parish clerk, and he also returned them to the Hall; and it was printed in the weekly bill of mortality in the usual manner, thus—

We didn't have printed newspapers back then to spread rumors and news, and to embellish them as I've seen happen since. Instead, information was gathered from letters written by merchants and others who corresponded abroad, and it was shared by word of mouth only. This meant that news didn't travel across the whole country instantly like it does now. However, it seems the Government had accurate information about it, and several meetings were held to discuss how to prevent it from coming here, but everything was kept very confidential. As a result, the rumor faded away, and people started to forget about it, thinking it was something we weren't really involved in and hoping it wasn't true. That was until late November or early December 1664 when two men, reportedly French, died of the plague in Long Acre, or rather at the upper end of Drury Lane. The family they were with tried to keep it quiet, but once it leaked out in local conversations, the Secretaries of State learned about it. They decided to investigate further to confirm the truth, so they sent two doctors and a surgeon to the house to inspect the situation. They did just that and found clear signs of the illness on both deceased individuals, and they publicly declared that they died of the plague. Following that, it was reported to the parish clerk, who also forwarded it to the Hall, and it was printed in the weekly mortality report in the usual format, as follows—

Plague, 2. Parishes infected, 1.

The people showed a great concern at this, and began to be alarmed all over the town, and the more, because in the last week in December 1664 another man died in the same house, and of the same distemper. And then we were easy again for about six weeks, when none having died with any marks of infection, it was said the distemper was gone; but after that, I think it was about the 12th of February, another died in another house, but in the same parish and in the same manner.

The people were very worried about this and started to panic throughout the town, especially since another man had died in the same house from the same illness in the last week of December 1664. We felt a sense of relief for about six weeks when no one else showed symptoms of infection, and it was said that the illness was gone. But then, around February 12th, another person died in a different house, still in the same parish and in the same way.

This turned the people’s eyes pretty much towards that end of the town, and the weekly bills showing an increase of burials in St Giles’s parish more than usual, it began to be suspected that the plague was among the people at that end of the town, and that many had died of it, though they had taken care to keep it as much from the knowledge of the public as possible. This possessed the heads of the people very much, and few cared to go through Drury Lane, or the other streets suspected, unless they had extraordinary business that obliged them to it

This made people focus their attention on that part of town, and the weekly reports showing an unusual rise in burials in St Giles’s parish led to suspicions that the plague was affecting people there, with many having died from it, even though they did their best to keep this information from the public. This occupied the minds of the locals a lot, and few wanted to walk through Drury Lane or the other areas under suspicion unless they had urgent business that forced them to.

This increase of the bills stood thus: the usual number of burials in a week, in the parishes of St Giles-in-the-Fields and St Andrew’s, Holborn, were from twelve to seventeen or nineteen each, few more or less; but from the time that the plague first began in St Giles’s parish, it was observed that the ordinary burials increased in number considerably. For example:—

This increase in burials went like this: the typical number of funerals in a week in the parishes of St. Giles-in-the-Fields and St. Andrew’s, Holborn, was between twelve and seventeen or nineteen each, give or take a few. However, once the plague started in St. Giles’s parish, it was noticed that the usual burials rose significantly. For example:—

     From December 27 to January 3  { St Giles’s      16
     ”                              { St Andrew’s     17

     ”     January 3  ”    ”    10  { St Giles’s      12
     ”                              { St Andrew’s     25

     ”     January 10 ”    ”    17  { St Giles’s      18
     ”                              { St Andrew’s     28

     ”     January 17 ”    ”    24  { St Giles’s      23
     ”                              { St Andrew’s     16

     ”     January 24 ”    ”    31  { St Giles’s      24
     ”                              { St Andrew’s     15

     ”     January 30 ” February 7  { St Giles’s      21
     ”                              { St Andrew’s     23

     ”     February 7 ”     ”   14  { St Giles’s      24
     From December 27 to January 3  { St Giles’s      16
     ”                              { St Andrew’s     17

     ”     January 3  ”    ”    10  { St Giles’s      12
     ”                              { St Andrew’s     25

     ”     January 10 ”    ”    17  { St Giles’s      18
     ”                              { St Andrew’s     28

     ”     January 17 ”    ”    24  { St Giles’s      23
     ”                              { St Andrew’s     16

     ”     January 24 ”    ”    31  { St Giles’s      24
     ”                              { St Andrew’s     15

     ”     January 30 ” February 7  { St Giles’s      21
     ”                              { St Andrew’s     23

     ”     February 7 ”     ”   14  { St Giles’s      24

The like increase of the bills was observed in the parishes of St Bride’s, adjoining on one side of Holborn parish, and in the parish of St James, Clerkenwell, adjoining on the other side of Holborn; in both which parishes the usual numbers that died weekly were from four to six or eight, whereas at that time they were increased as follows:—

The same rise in the death toll was seen in the parishes of St Bride’s, next to Holborn parish on one side, and in the parish of St James, Clerkenwell, on the other side of Holborn; in both of these parishes, the usual number of weekly deaths ranged from four to six or eight, but at that time it increased as follows:—

     From December 20 to December 27  { St Bride’s     0
     ”                                { St James’s     8

     ”    December 27 to January   3  { St Bride’s     6
     ”                                { St James’s     9

     ”    January  3  ”    ”      10  { St Bride’s    11
     ”                                { St James’s     7

     ”    January 10  ”    ”      17  { St Bride’s    12
     ”                                { St James’s     9

     ”    January 17  ”    ”      24  { St Bride’s     9
     ”                                { St James’s    15

     ”    January 24  ”    ”      31  { St Bride’s     8
     ”                                { St James’s    12

     ”    January 31  ” February   7  { St Bride’s    13
     ”                                { St James’s     5

     ”    February 7  ”    ”      14  { St Bride’s     12
     ”                                { St James’s     6
     From December 20 to December 27  { St Bride’s     0
     ”                                { St James’s     8

     ”    December 27 to January   3  { St Bride’s     6
     ”                                { St James’s     9

     ”    January  3  ”    ”      10  { St Bride’s    11
     ”                                { St James’s     7

     ”    January 10  ”    ”      17  { St Bride’s    12
     ”                                { St James’s     9

     ”    January 17  ”    ”      24  { St Bride’s     9
     ”                                { St James’s    15

     ”    January 24  ”    ”      31  { St Bride’s     8
     ”                                { St James’s     12

     ”    January 31  ” February   7  { St Bride’s    13
     ”                                { St James’s     5

     ”    February 7  ”    ”      14  { St Bride’s     12
     ”                                { St James’s     6

Besides this, it was observed with great uneasiness by the people that the weekly bills in general increased very much during these weeks, although it was at a time of the year when usually the bills are very moderate.

Besides this, the people noticed with great unease that the weekly bills had risen significantly during these weeks, even though it was typically a time of year when the bills are quite low.

The usual number of burials within the bills of mortality for a week was from about 240 or thereabouts to 300. The last was esteemed a pretty high bill; but after this we found the bills successively increasing as follows:—

The typical number of burials listed in the mortality reports for a week ranged from around 240 to 300. The latter was considered quite high; however, after this, we noticed the numbers steadily increasing as follows:—

     Buried.  Increased.
     December the 20th to the 27th               291       ...
     ”     ”      27th  ”     3rd January        349        58
     January  the  3rd  ”    10th   ”            394        45
     ”     ”      10th  ”    17th   ”            415        21
     ”     ”      17th  ”    24th   ”            474        59
     Buried.  Increased.
     December 20th to 27th               291       ...
     ”     ”     27th  ”     January 3rd        349        58
     January 3rd  ”    10th   ”            394        45
     ”     ”      10th  ”    17th   ”            415        21
     ”     ”      17th  ”    24th   ”            474        59

This last bill was really frightful, being a higher number than had been known to have been buried in one week since the preceding visitation of 1656.

This last bill was truly alarming, being a higher number than has been known to be buried in one week since the last outbreak of 1656.

However, all this went off again, and the weather proving cold, and the frost, which began in December, still continuing very severe even till near the end of February, attended with sharp though moderate winds, the bills decreased again, and the city grew healthy, and everybody began to look upon the danger as good as over; only that still the burials in St Giles’s continued high. From the beginning of April especially they stood at twenty-five each week, till the week from the 18th to the 25th, when there was buried in St Giles’s parish thirty, whereof two of the plague and eight of the spotted-fever, which was looked upon as the same thing; likewise the number that died of the spotted-fever in the whole increased, being eight the week before, and twelve the week above-named.

However, all this changed again, and with the weather being cold and the frost, which started in December, still harsh even until near the end of February—with sharp but moderate winds—the death toll decreased again, and the city became healthier. Everyone started to feel that the danger was almost over; however, the burials in St. Giles's remained high. From the beginning of April, especially, they were at twenty-five each week, until the week from the 18th to the 25th when thirty people were buried in St. Giles's parish, including two from the plague and eight from the spotted fever, which was considered to be the same thing. Additionally, the number of deaths caused by the spotted fever overall increased, going from eight the previous week to twelve in the week mentioned above.

This alarmed us all again, and terrible apprehensions were among the people, especially the weather being now changed and growing warm, and the summer being at hand. However, the next week there seemed to be some hopes again; the bills were low, the number of the dead in all was but 388, there was none of the plague, and but four of the spotted-fever.

This worried us all again, and there were serious concerns among the people, especially since the weather had changed and was getting warmer, with summer approaching. However, the following week, there seemed to be some hope again; the death toll was low, totaling only 388, there was no plague, and just four cases of the spotted fever.

But the following week it returned again, and the distemper was spread into two or three other parishes, viz., St Andrew’s, Holborn; St Clement Danes; and, to the great affliction of the city, one died within the walls, in the parish of St Mary Woolchurch, that is to say, in Bearbinder Lane, near Stocks Market; in all there were nine of the plague and six of the spotted-fever. It was, however, upon inquiry found that this Frenchman who died in Bearbinder Lane was one who, having lived in Long Acre, near the infected houses, had removed for fear of the distemper, not knowing that he was already infected.

But the following week, it came back, and the sickness spread to two or three other neighborhoods, namely St Andrew’s in Holborn, St Clement Danes, and, to the city's great sorrow, one person died within the city walls, in the parish of St Mary Woolchurch, specifically on Bearbinder Lane near Stocks Market. In total, there were nine cases of the plague and six of the spotted fever. However, upon investigation, it was found that this Frenchman who died on Bearbinder Lane was someone who had lived in Long Acre near the infected houses and had moved out in fear of the sickness, not realizing he was already infected.

This was the beginning of May, yet the weather was temperate, variable, and cool enough, and people had still some hopes. That which encouraged them was that the city was healthy: the whole ninety-seven parishes buried but fifty-four, and we began to hope that, as it was chiefly among the people at that end of the town, it might go no farther; and the rather, because the next week, which was from the 9th of May to the 16th, there died but three, of which not one within the whole city or liberties; and St Andrew’s buried but fifteen, which was very low. ’Tis true St Giles’s buried two-and-thirty, but still, as there was but one of the plague, people began to be easy. The whole bill also was very low, for the week before the bill was but 347, and the week above mentioned but 343. We continued in these hopes for a few days, but it was but for a few, for the people were no more to be deceived thus; they searched the houses and found that the plague was really spread every way, and that many died of it every day. So that now all our extenuations abated, and it was no more to be concealed; nay, it quickly appeared that the infection had spread itself beyond all hopes of abatement. That in the parish of St Giles it was gotten into several streets, and several families lay all sick together; and, accordingly, in the weekly bill for the next week the thing began to show itself. There was indeed but fourteen set down of the plague, but this was all knavery and collusion, for in St Giles’s parish they buried forty in all, whereof it was certain most of them died of the plague, though they were set down of other distempers; and though the number of all the burials were not increased above thirty-two, and the whole bill being but 385, yet there was fourteen of the spotted-fever, as well as fourteen of the plague; and we took it for granted upon the whole that there were fifty died that week of the plague.

This was the beginning of May, yet the weather was mild, changeable, and cool enough, giving people a bit of hope. What encouraged them was that the city was mostly healthy: out of ninety-seven neighborhoods, only fifty-four had deaths, and we started to think that since it was mainly concentrated in that part of town, it might not spread further. Moreover, in the week from May 9th to the 16th, only three people died, none within the city or its surrounding areas; and St. Andrew's had only fifteen burials, which was quite low. It’s true St. Giles’s reported thirty-two burials, but since there was only one death from the plague, people began to relax. The total number of deaths was also low, as the previous week had just 347, and the week mentioned had 343. We held onto this hope for a few days, but it didn't last long, as people were no longer fooled; they searched homes and discovered that the plague was actually spreading everywhere, with many dying from it every day. All our previous reassurances faded, and it couldn’t be hidden anymore; indeed, it quickly became clear that the infection had spread beyond any hope of control. In the parish of St. Giles, it had reached several streets, and numerous families were sick together; thus, in the weekly report for the following week, the situation began to be evident. There were only fourteen deaths officially recorded due to the plague, but this was all deceit and manipulation, as in St. Giles’s parish they buried a total of forty, most of whom certainly died from the plague, even though they were recorded as dying from other causes. Although the overall number of burials didn’t increase by more than thirty-two and the total bill was just 385, there were fourteen from the spotted fever, in addition to fourteen from the plague; we assumed that, in total, about fifty people died that week from the plague.

The next bill was from the 23rd of May to the 30th, when the number of the plague was seventeen. But the burials in St Giles’s were fifty-three—a frightful number!—of whom they set down but nine of the plague; but on an examination more strictly by the justices of peace, and at the Lord Mayor’s request, it was found there were twenty more who were really dead of the plague in that parish, but had been set down of the spotted-fever or other distempers, besides others concealed.

The next bill covered the period from May 23rd to the 30th, during which the plague count was seventeen. However, the number of burials in St. Giles’s was fifty-three—a horrifying total! They recorded only nine deaths from the plague, but a closer examination by the justices of the peace, at the request of the Lord Mayor, revealed that there were actually twenty more who had truly died from the plague in that parish, yet were listed as having died from spotted fever or other illnesses, along with additional cases that were kept hidden.

But those were trifling things to what followed immediately after; for now the weather set in hot, and from the first week in June the infection spread in a dreadful manner, and the bills rose high; the articles of the fever, spotted-fever, and teeth began to swell; for all that could conceal their distempers did it, to prevent their neighbours shunning and refusing to converse with them, and also to prevent authority shutting up their houses; which, though it was not yet practised, yet was threatened, and people were extremely terrified at the thoughts of it.

But those were minor issues compared to what happened next; the weather turned hot, and starting in the first week of June, the infection spread rapidly and terrifyingly, with the death toll rising sharply. The cases of fever, spotted fever, and swollen gums began to increase; everyone who could hide their illnesses did so to keep their neighbors from avoiding them and to stop the authorities from sealing up their homes. Although this wasn’t happening yet, it was a threat looming over them, and people were very scared at the mere thought of it.

The second week in June, the parish of St Giles, where still the weight of the infection lay, buried 120, whereof though the bills said but sixty-eight of the plague, everybody said there had been 100 at least, calculating it from the usual number of funerals in that parish, as above.

The second week in June, the parish of St Giles, where the burden of the infection was still heavy, buried 120 people, although the official reports only mentioned sixty-eight deaths from the plague. Everyone believed the actual number was at least 100, based on the typical number of funerals in that parish, as mentioned earlier.

Till this week the city continued free, there having never any died, except that one Frenchman whom I mentioned before, within the whole ninety-seven parishes. Now there died four within the city, one in Wood Street, one in Fenchurch Street, and two in Crooked Lane. Southwark was entirely free, having not one yet died on that side of the water.

Till this week, the city remained free of deaths, with the only exception being the one Frenchman I mentioned earlier, throughout the entire ninety-seven parishes. Now, four people have died in the city: one on Wood Street, one on Fenchurch Street, and two on Crooked Lane. Southwark was completely free, as there had not been a single death on that side of the river yet.

I lived without Aldgate, about midway between Aldgate Church and Whitechappel Bars, on the left hand or north side of the street; and as the distemper had not reached to that side of the city, our neighbourhood continued very easy. But at the other end of the town their consternation was very great: and the richer sort of people, especially the nobility and gentry from the west part of the city, thronged out of town with their families and servants in an unusual manner; and this was more particularly seen in Whitechappel; that is to say, the Broad Street where I lived; indeed, nothing was to be seen but waggons and carts, with goods, women, servants, children, &c.; coaches filled with people of the better sort and horsemen attending them, and all hurrying away; then empty waggons and carts appeared, and spare horses with servants, who, it was apparent, were returning or sent from the countries to fetch more people; besides innumerable numbers of men on horseback, some alone, others with servants, and, generally speaking, all loaded with baggage and fitted out for travelling, as anyone might perceive by their appearance.

I lived near Aldgate, about halfway between Aldgate Church and Whitechapel Bars, on the north side of the street; and since the illness hadn't spread to that part of the city, our neighborhood remained quite calm. But at the other end of town, there was a lot of panic: wealthier people, especially the nobility and gentry from the western side of the city, hurriedly left town with their families and servants in an unusual way; this was especially noticeable in Whitechapel, meaning the Broad Street where I lived. In fact, all you could see were wagons and carts filled with goods, women, servants, children, etc.; coaches packed with well-off people and horsemen accompanying them, all rushing to get away; then there were empty wagons and carts showing up, and spare horses with servants, who were clearly returning or being sent from the countryside to bring back more people; not to mention countless men on horseback, some alone, others with servants, and generally speaking, all carrying luggage and set for traveling, as anyone could tell by their looks.

This was a very terrible and melancholy thing to see, and as it was a sight which I could not but look on from morning to night (for indeed there was nothing else of moment to be seen), it filled me with very serious thoughts of the misery that was coming upon the city, and the unhappy condition of those that would be left in it.

This was a really sad and tragic thing to witness, and since it was something I couldn’t help but watch from morning to night (because there was nothing else important to see), it filled me with deep thoughts about the suffering that was about to hit the city and the unfortunate situation of those who would remain in it.

This hurry of the people was such for some weeks that there was no getting at the Lord Mayor’s door without exceeding difficulty; there were such pressing and crowding there to get passes and certificates of health for such as travelled abroad, for without these there was no being admitted to pass through the towns upon the road, or to lodge in any inn. Now, as there had none died in the city for all this time, my Lord Mayor gave certificates of health without any difficulty to all those who lived in the ninety-seven parishes, and to those within the liberties too for a while.

The rush of people lasted for several weeks, making it extremely difficult to get to the Lord Mayor's office. Everyone was urgently crowding there to obtain passes and health certificates for those traveling abroad, because without these, they couldn't pass through towns or stay in any inns. Since there hadn't been any deaths in the city during this time, the Lord Mayor issued health certificates without hassle to everyone living in the ninety-seven parishes, and for a while, to those within the liberties as well.

This hurry, I say, continued some weeks, that is to say, all the month of May and June, and the more because it was rumoured that an order of the Government was to be issued out to place turnpikes and barriers on the road to prevent people travelling, and that the towns on the road would not suffer people from London to pass for fear of bringing the infection along with them, though neither of these rumours had any foundation but in the imagination, especially at-first.

This rush, I’ll say, went on for a few weeks, meaning all of May and June, and even more so because there were rumors that the Government was going to issue an order to set up tolls and barriers on the road to stop people from traveling. It was said that the towns along the way wouldn’t allow people from London to pass through for fear of bringing the infection with them, even though neither of these rumors had any real basis, especially at first.

I now began to consider seriously with myself concerning my own case, and how I should dispose of myself; that is to say, whether I should resolve to stay in London or shut up my house and flee, as many of my neighbours did. I have set this particular down so fully, because I know not but it may be of moment to those who come after me, if they come to be brought to the same distress, and to the same manner of making their choice; and therefore I desire this account may pass with them rather for a direction to themselves to act by than a history of my actings, seeing it may not be of one farthing value to them to note what became of me.

I started to seriously think about my situation and what I should do next; specifically, whether I should decide to stay in London or lock up my house and run away, like many of my neighbors did. I've written this down in detail because it might be important for those who come after me if they find themselves in the same tough spot and facing the same choices. So, I hope this account serves more as guidance for them rather than just a record of what I did, since it probably isn't worth anything to them to know what happened to me.

I had two important things before me: the one was the carrying on my business and shop, which was considerable, and in which was embarked all my effects in the world; and the other was the preservation of my life in so dismal a calamity as I saw apparently was coming upon the whole city, and which, however great it was, my fears perhaps, as well as other people’s, represented to be much greater than it could be.

I had two important things to think about: one was running my business and shop, which was significant and where all my assets were invested; the other was trying to save my life in such a dire situation as I could see looming over the entire city. Even though the threat seemed huge, my fears, just like those of others, probably made it seem even worse than it actually was.

The first consideration was of great moment to me; my trade was a saddler, and as my dealings were chiefly not by a shop or chance trade, but among the merchants trading to the English colonies in America, so my effects lay very much in the hands of such. I was a single man, ’tis true, but I had a family of servants whom I kept at my business; had a house, shop, and warehouses filled with goods; and, in short, to leave them all as things in such a case must be left (that is to say, without any overseer or person fit to be trusted with them), had been to hazard the loss not only of my trade, but of my goods, and indeed of all I had in the world.

The first consideration was extremely important to me; my trade was as a saddler, and since my business mostly involved dealing with merchants trading to the English colonies in America rather than by a shop or casual sales, my assets were largely in their hands. I was a single man, it's true, but I had a staff of workers who I employed for my business; I owned a house, a shop, and warehouses full of goods. In short, leaving them all in such circumstances (that is, without any supervisor or trustworthy person to oversee them) would have risked not just my trade, but also my goods, and essentially everything I owned.

I had an elder brother at the same time in London, and not many years before come over from Portugal: and advising with him, his answer was in three words, the same that was given in another case quite different, viz., ‘Master, save thyself.’ In a word, he was for my retiring into the country, as he resolved to do himself with his family; telling me what he had, it seems, heard abroad, that the best preparation for the plague was to run away from it. As to my argument of losing my trade, my goods, or debts, he quite confuted me. He told me the same thing which I argued for my staying, viz., that I would trust God with my safety and health, was the strongest repulse to my pretensions of losing my trade and my goods; ‘for’, says he, ‘is it not as reasonable that you should trust God with the chance or risk of losing your trade, as that you should stay in so eminent a point of danger, and trust Him with your life?’

I had an older brother in London at that time, who had moved over from Portugal not long before. When I consulted him, his response was straightforward: "Master, save yourself." In essence, he suggested that I retreat to the countryside, which he planned to do with his family. He shared what he had apparently heard, that the best way to prepare for the plague was to escape from it. Regarding my concerns about losing my business, my belongings, or my debts, he completely countered my arguments. He told me that my reasoning for wanting to stay—trusting God with my safety and health—was actually a strong argument against my worries about losing my trade and goods. "After all," he said, "isn’t it just as reasonable for you to trust God with the risk of losing your trade as it is to stay in such a dangerous situation and trust Him with your life?"

I could not argue that I was in any strait as to a place where to go, having several friends and relations in Northamptonshire, whence our family first came from; and particularly, I had an only sister in Lincolnshire, very willing to receive and entertain me.

I couldn’t say that I was in any trouble figuring out where to go, since I had several friends and family in Northamptonshire, where our family originally came from; and especially, I had a sole sister in Lincolnshire who was more than happy to welcome and host me.

My brother, who had already sent his wife and two children into Bedfordshire, and resolved to follow them, pressed my going very earnestly; and I had once resolved to comply with his desires, but at that time could get no horse; for though it is true all the people did not go out of the city of London, yet I may venture to say that in a manner all the horses did; for there was hardly a horse to be bought or hired in the whole city for some weeks. Once I resolved to travel on foot with one servant, and, as many did, lie at no inn, but carry a soldier’s tent with us, and so lie in the fields, the weather being very warm, and no danger from taking cold. I say, as many did, because several did so at last, especially those who had been in the armies in the war which had not been many years past; and I must needs say that, speaking of second causes, had most of the people that travelled done so, the plague had not been carried into so many country towns and houses as it was, to the great damage, and indeed to the ruin, of abundance of people.

My brother, who had already sent his wife and two kids to Bedfordshire and planned to join them, strongly urged me to go too. I had initially intended to follow his wishes, but at that moment, I couldn't find a horse. Even though not everyone was leaving the city of London, I can confidently say that almost all the horses were gone; there was hardly a horse available for purchase or rent in the entire city for weeks. At one point, I considered walking with one servant and, like many others, not staying at any inns but bringing along a soldier’s tent to sleep in the fields, since the weather was quite warm, and there was little risk of catching a cold. I mention this because many people eventually did that, especially those who had been in the armies during the war a few years earlier. I must say, looking at the indirect causes, if most travelers had done the same, the plague wouldn’t have spread to so many country towns and homes as it did, causing significant harm and, in fact, leading to the ruin of many people.

But then my servant, whom I had intended to take down with me, deceived me; and being frighted at the increase of the distemper, and not knowing when I should go, he took other measures, and left me, so I was put off for that time; and, one way or other, I always found that to appoint to go away was always crossed by some accident or other, so as to disappoint and put it off again; and this brings in a story which otherwise might be thought a needless digression, viz., about these disappointments being from Heaven.

But then my servant, whom I had planned to take with me, tricked me; and being scared by the worsening situation and not knowing when I would leave, he made other plans and abandoned me, so I was delayed that time. One way or another, I always found that whenever I set a date to leave, something would unexpectedly happen to stop me and push it back again. This leads to a story that might otherwise seem like an unnecessary tangent, about how these setbacks came from a higher power.

I mention this story also as the best method I can advise any person to take in such a case, especially if he be one that makes conscience of his duty, and would be directed what to do in it, namely, that he should keep his eye upon the particular providences which occur at that time, and look upon them complexly, as they regard one another, and as all together regard the question before him: and then, I think, he may safely take them for intimations from Heaven of what is his unquestioned duty to do in such a case; I mean as to going away from or staying in the place where we dwell, when visited with an infectious distemper.

I share this story as the best advice I can give anyone in this situation, especially if they are conscientious about their responsibilities and need guidance on what to do. They should pay attention to the specific events unfolding during that time and consider how they relate to one another, as well as how they all connect to the question at hand. I believe this way, they can safely interpret these events as indications from a higher power regarding their clear duty in such circumstances, specifically about whether to leave or stay in the place where they live when faced with an infectious disease.

It came very warmly into my mind one morning, as I was musing on this particular thing, that as nothing attended us without the direction or permission of Divine Power, so these disappointments must have something in them extraordinary; and I ought to consider whether it did not evidently point out, or intimate to me, that it was the will of Heaven I should not go. It immediately followed in my thoughts, that if it really was from God that I should stay, He was able effectually to preserve me in the midst of all the death and danger that would surround me; and that if I attempted to secure myself by fleeing from my habitation, and acted contrary to these intimations, which I believe to be Divine, it was a kind of flying from God, and that He could cause His justice to overtake me when and where He thought fit.

One morning, while I was thinking about this, it struck me that nothing happens to us without the guidance or permission of a higher power. This made me realize that these setbacks must have some special significance, and I needed to consider if they were indicating that it was God's will for me not to go. Then it occurred to me that if it was indeed God's plan for me to stay, He would be capable of keeping me safe amid all the dangers and death surrounding me. And if I tried to protect myself by running away from my home, acting against what I believed to be divine signs, it would be like running away from God. He could bring about justice on me whenever and wherever He deemed necessary.

These thoughts quite turned my resolutions again, and when I came to discourse with my brother again I told him that I inclined to stay and take my lot in that station in which God had placed me, and that it seemed to be made more especially my duty, on the account of what I have said.

These thoughts changed my mind again, and when I talked to my brother later, I told him that I was leaning towards staying and embracing the situation that God had put me in, and it felt especially like my duty because of what I had said.

My brother, though a very religious man himself, laughed at all I had suggested about its being an intimation from Heaven, and told me several stories of such foolhardy people, as he called them, as I was; that I ought indeed to submit to it as a work of Heaven if I had been any way disabled by distempers or diseases, and that then not being able to go, I ought to acquiesce in the direction of Him, who, having been my Maker, had an undisputed right of sovereignty in disposing of me, and that then there had been no difficulty to determine which was the call of His providence and which was not; but that I should take it as an intimation from Heaven that I should not go out of town, only because I could not hire a horse to go, or my fellow was run away that was to attend me, was ridiculous, since at the time I had my health and limbs, and other servants, and might with ease travel a day or two on foot, and having a good certificate of being in perfect health, might either hire a horse or take post on the road, as I thought fit.

My brother, although he was a very religious man, laughed at everything I suggested about it being a sign from Heaven. He told me several stories about people like me, whom he called reckless. He said that I should accept it as a work of Heaven if I had been in any way affected by illness or disease. He insisted that if I were unable to go, I should accept what He, my Creator, wanted for me, as He had the ultimate right to determine my path. Then it would have been clear which was a sign from His providence and which wasn't. But to take it as a message from Heaven just because I couldn't find a horse to ride or because my companion who was supposed to go with me had run away was absurd. He reminded me that at that moment, I was healthy and able-bodied, and I had other servants who could help. I could easily walk for a day or two, and with proof of my good health, I could hire a horse or travel by coach as I saw fit.

Then he proceeded to tell me of the mischievous consequences which attended the presumption of the Turks and Mahometans in Asia and in other places where he had been (for my brother, being a merchant, was a few years before, as I have already observed, returned from abroad, coming last from Lisbon), and how, presuming upon their professed predestinating notions, and of every man’s end being predetermined and unalterably beforehand decreed, they would go unconcerned into infected places and converse with infected persons, by which means they died at the rate of ten or fifteen thousand a week, whereas the Europeans or Christian merchants, who kept themselves retired and reserved, generally escaped the contagion.

Then he went on to share the reckless consequences that came from the arrogance of the Turks and Muslims in Asia and other places he had visited (my brother, being a merchant, had returned from abroad a few years ago, last coming from Lisbon). He explained how, believing in their ideas of predestination and that everyone's fate was set in stone, they would casually enter infected areas and interact with sick people. As a result, they were dying at a rate of ten to fifteen thousand a week, while the Europeans or Christian merchants, who stayed cautious and kept to themselves, usually avoided the outbreak.

Upon these arguments my brother changed my resolutions again, and I began to resolve to go, and accordingly made all things ready; for, in short, the infection increased round me, and the bills were risen to almost seven hundred a week, and my brother told me he would venture to stay no longer. I desired him to let me consider of it but till the next day, and I would resolve: and as I had already prepared everything as well as I could as to MY business, and whom to entrust my affairs with, I had little to do but to resolve.

Based on these arguments, my brother changed my mind again, and I started deciding to leave, so I prepared everything; the infection was spreading around me, and the death toll had risen to almost seven hundred a week. My brother said he couldn’t stay any longer. I asked him to let me think it over until the next day, and I would make a decision. Since I had already organized as much as I could regarding my business and who to trust with my affairs, there was little left to do but make a decision.

I went home that evening greatly oppressed in my mind, irresolute, and not knowing what to do. I had set the evening wholly apart to consider seriously about it, and was all alone; for already people had, as it were by a general consent, taken up the custom of not going out of doors after sunset; the reasons I shall have occasion to say more of by-and-by.

I went home that evening feeling really weighed down, unsure of myself and not knowing what to do. I had planned the whole evening to think about it seriously, and I was completely alone; everyone had, it seemed, agreed to the habit of not going outside after sunset. I’ll elaborate on the reasons for that later.

In the retirement of this evening I endeavoured to resolve, first, what was my duty to do, and I stated the arguments with which my brother had pressed me to go into the country, and I set, against them the strong impressions which I had on my mind for staying; the visible call I seemed to have from the particular circumstance of my calling, and the care due from me for the preservation of my effects, which were, as I might say, my estate; also the intimations which I thought I had from Heaven, that to me signified a kind of direction to venture; and it occurred to me that if I had what I might call a direction to stay, I ought to suppose it contained a promise of being preserved if I obeyed.

As I relaxed this evening, I tried to figure out what my responsibilities were. I considered the arguments my brother made for why I should go to the country, and I weighed them against the strong feelings I had about staying. I felt a clear obligation related to my work and a need to take care of my belongings, which I considered my property. I also had what I believed were messages from above, suggesting that I should take a chance. It struck me that if I felt guided to stay, it must imply a promise of safety if I followed that guidance.

This lay close to me, and my mind seemed more and more encouraged to stay than ever, and supported with a secret satisfaction that I should be kept. Add to this, that, turning over the Bible which lay before me, and while my thoughts were more than ordinarily serious upon the question, I cried out, ‘Well, I know not what to do; Lord, direct me !’ and the like; and at that juncture I happened to stop turning over the book at the ninety-first Psalm, and casting my eye on the second verse, I read on to the seventh verse exclusive, and after that included the tenth, as follows: ‘I will say of the Lord, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God, in Him will I trust. Surely He shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence. He shall cover thee with His feathers, and under His wings shalt thou trust: His truth shall be thy shield and buckler. Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day; nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday. A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come nigh thee. Only with thine eyes shalt thou behold and see the reward of the wicked. Because thou hast made the Lord, which is my refuge, even the most High, thy habitation; there shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling,’ &C.

This was very close to me, and my mind felt increasingly encouraged to stay rather than leave, filled with a quiet satisfaction that I would be kept safe. On top of this, as I flipped through the Bible in front of me and my thoughts became more serious about the decision, I cried out, “Well, I don’t know what to do; Lord, guide me!” and similar pleas. At that moment, I happened to stop at the ninety-first Psalm, and as I looked at the second verse, I read through to the seventh verse and then included the tenth, which says: “I will say of the Lord, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God, in Him will I trust. Surely He will deliver you from the snare of the fowler and from the deadly pestilence. He will cover you with His feathers, and under His wings you will trust: His truth will be your shield and buckler. You shall not be afraid of the terror by night, nor of the arrow that flies by day, nor of the pestilence that walks in darkness, nor of the destruction that lays waste at noon. A thousand may fall at your side, and ten thousand at your right hand; but it shall not come near you. Only with your eyes shall you see and behold the reward of the wicked. Because you have made the Lord, my refuge, even the Most High, your dwelling place; no evil shall befall you, nor shall any plague come near your home,” &C.

I scarce need tell the reader that from that moment I resolved that I would stay in the town, and casting myself entirely upon the goodness and protection of the Almighty, would not seek any other shelter whatever; and that, as my times were in His hands, He was as able to keep me in a time of the infection as in a time of health; and if He did not think fit to deliver me, still I was in His hands, and it was meet He should do with me as should seem good to Him.

I hardly need to tell the reader that from that moment on, I decided to stay in the town, completely relying on the goodness and protection of God. I wouldn’t look for any other shelter; my fate was in His hands, and He could keep me safe during an outbreak just as well as during a time of health. If He didn’t choose to save me, I was still in His hands, and it was right for Him to do as He saw fit.

With this resolution I went to bed; and I was further confirmed in it the next day by the woman being taken ill with whom I had intended to entrust my house and all my affairs. But I had a further obligation laid on me on the same side, for the next day I found myself very much out of order also, so that if I would have gone away, I could not, and I continued ill three or four days, and this entirely determined my stay; so I took my leave of my brother, who went away to Dorking, in Surrey, and afterwards fetched a round farther into Buckinghamshire or Bedfordshire, to a retreat he had found out there for his family.

With this decision, I went to bed, and I was even more convinced the next day when the woman I had planned to trust with my house and all my affairs fell ill. But I had another obligation on my plate, as I also felt quite unwell the next day, so much so that I couldn't leave even if I wanted to. I stayed sick for three or four days, which completely sealed my decision to stay. I said goodbye to my brother, who headed off to Dorking in Surrey, then traveled a bit farther into Buckinghamshire or Bedfordshire to a place he had found for his family.

It was a very ill time to be sick in, for if any one complained, it was immediately said he had the plague; and though I had indeed no symptom of that distemper, yet being very ill, both in my head and in my stomach, I was not without apprehension that I really was infected; but in about three days I grew better; the third night I rested well, sweated a little, and was much refreshed. The apprehensions of its being the infection went also quite away with my illness, and I went about my business as usual.

It was a really bad time to be sick, because if anyone complained, it was instantly said they had the plague. Even though I didn't actually show any symptoms of that illness, I was feeling pretty terrible, both in my head and stomach, and I worried that I might really be infected. However, after about three days, I started to feel better. On the third night, I slept well, sweated a bit, and felt much more refreshed. My fears about it being an infection completely went away along with my illness, and I got back to my usual routine.

These things, however, put off all my thoughts of going into the country; and my brother also being gone, I had no more debate either with him or with myself on that subject.

These things, however, distracted me from thinking about going to the countryside; and with my brother gone too, I had no further discussions with him or even with myself on that topic.

It was now mid-July, and the plague, which had chiefly raged at the other end of the town, and, as I said before, in the parishes of St Giles, St Andrew’s, Holborn, and towards Westminster, began to now come eastward towards the part where I lived. It was to be observed, indeed, that it did not come straight on towards us; for the city, that is to say, within the walls, was indifferently healthy still; nor was it got then very much over the water into Southwark; for though there died that week 1268 of all distempers, whereof it might be supposed above 600 died of the plague, yet there was but twenty-eight in the whole city, within the walls, and but nineteen in Southwark, Lambeth parish included; whereas in the parishes of St Giles and St Martin-in-the-Fields alone there died 421.

It was now mid-July, and the plague, which had mostly been affecting the other side of town, particularly in the areas of St Giles, St Andrew’s, Holborn, and towards Westminster, was starting to move east towards where I lived. In fact, it was noticeable that it wasn't approaching us directly; the city itself, inside the walls, was still relatively healthy; nor had it spread much across the river into Southwark. That week, although 1,268 people died from various ailments, it was estimated that over 600 of those were due to the plague, yet only twenty-eight died within the entire city walls, and just nineteen in Southwark, including Lambeth parish; meanwhile, in the parishes of St Giles and St Martin-in-the-Fields alone, there were 421 deaths.

But we perceived the infection kept chiefly in the out-parishes, which being very populous, and fuller also of poor, the distemper found more to prey upon than in the city, as I shall observe afterwards. We perceived, I say, the distemper to draw our way, viz., by the parishes of Clarkenwell, Cripplegate, Shoreditch, and Bishopsgate; which last two parishes joining to Aldgate, Whitechappel, and Stepney, the infection came at length to spread its utmost rage and violence in those parts, even when it abated at the western parishes where it began.

But we noticed that the infection was primarily concentrated in the outer parishes, which were very crowded and had a lot of poor people, giving the disease more opportunities to spread than in the city, as I will explain later. We noticed, I say, that the disease was moving our way, specifically through the parishes of Clerkenwell, Cripplegate, Shoreditch, and Bishopsgate; the last two parishes were adjacent to Aldgate, Whitechapel, and Stepney, where the infection ultimately unleashed its full intensity and violence, even as it began to decrease in the western parishes where it first started.

It was very strange to observe that in this particular week, from the 4th to the 11th of July, when, as I have observed, there died near 400 of the plague in the two parishes of St Martin and St Giles-in-the-Fields only, there died in the parish of Aldgate but four, in the parish of Whitechappel three, in the parish of Stepney but one.

It was quite odd to notice that during this specific week, from July 4th to July 11th, when, as I noted, nearly 400 people died from the plague in the two parishes of St. Martin and St. Giles-in-the-Fields alone, there were only four deaths in the parish of Aldgate, three in the parish of Whitechapel, and just one in the parish of Stepney.

Likewise in the next week, from the 11th of July to the 18th, when the week’s bill was 1761, yet there died no more of the plague, on the whole Southwark side of the water, than sixteen. But this face of things soon changed, and it began to thicken in Cripplegate parish especially, and in Clarkenwell; so that by the second week in August, Cripplegate parish alone buried 886, and Clarkenwell 155. Of the first, 850 might well be reckoned to die of the plague; and of the last, the bill itself said 145 were of the plague.

Similarly, in the following week, from July 11th to July 18th, when the weekly death toll was 1,761, the number of plague deaths on the Southwark side of the river was only sixteen. However, this situation quickly changed, especially in the Cripplegate parish and Clerkenwell; by the second week of August, Cripplegate parish alone reported 886 deaths, and Clerkenwell had 155. Of the deaths in Cripplegate, it's likely that 850 were due to the plague, while the report for Clerkenwell indicated that 145 were plague-related.

During the month of July, and while, as I have observed, our part of the town seemed to be spared in comparison of the west part, I went ordinarily about the streets, as my business required, and particularly went generally once in a day, or in two days, into the city, to my brother’s house, which he had given me charge of, and to see if it was safe; and having the key in my pocket, I used to go into the house, and over most of the rooms, to see that all was well; for though it be something wonderful to tell, that any should have hearts so hardened in the midst of such a calamity as to rob and steal, yet certain it is that all sorts of villainies, and even levities and debaucheries, were then practised in the town as openly as ever—I will not say quite as frequently, because the numbers of people were many ways lessened.

In July, I noticed that our part of town seemed to be less affected compared to the western side. I typically walked around the streets as my work required, and I generally made a trip to the city every day or every couple of days to check on my brother's house, which he had entrusted to me, and to ensure it was safe. With the key in my pocket, I would go inside and check most of the rooms to make sure everything was okay. While it's surprising to think that some people could be so cold-hearted during such a disaster that they would rob and steal, it's clear that all kinds of crimes, as well as wild behavior, were being carried out in town as openly as ever—though I won't say just as often, since the number of people had decreased in many ways.

But the city itself began now to be visited too, I mean within the walls; but the number of people there were indeed extremely lessened by so great a multitude having been gone into the country; and even all this month of July they continued to flee, though not in such multitudes as formerly. In August, indeed, they fled in such a manner that I began to think there would be really none but magistrates and servants left in the city.

But now the city itself started getting visitors too, I mean within the walls; however, the number of people there was actually greatly reduced since so many had left for the countryside. Even throughout this month of July, they kept fleeing, though not in such large numbers as before. In August, they fled in such a way that I began to think there would really be only magistrates and servants left in the city.

As they fled now out of the city, so I should observe that the Court removed early, viz., in the month of June, and went to Oxford, where it pleased God to preserve them; and the distemper did not, as I heard of, so much as touch them, for which I cannot say that I ever saw they showed any great token of thankfulness, and hardly anything of reformation, though they did not want being told that their crying vices might without breach of charity be said to have gone far in bringing that terrible judgement upon the whole nation.

As they escaped the city, I should note that the Court left early, in June, and went to Oxford, where it seemed God kept them safe; the sickness, as far as I heard, didn't affect them at all. I can't say I ever saw them show much gratitude or any real change, even though they were often reminded that their glaring faults could be said, without being unkind, to have greatly contributed to that terrible judgement on the entire nation.

The face of London was—now indeed strangely altered: I mean the whole mass of buildings, city, liberties, suburbs, Westminster, Southwark, and altogether; for as to the particular part called the city, or within the walls, that was not yet much infected. But in the whole the face of things, I say, was much altered; sorrow and sadness sat upon every face; and though some parts were not yet overwhelmed, yet all looked deeply concerned; and, as we saw it apparently coming on, so every one looked on himself and his family as in the utmost danger. Were it possible to represent those times exactly to those that did not see them, and give the reader due ideas of the horror ‘that everywhere presented itself, it must make just impressions upon their minds and fill them with surprise. London might well be said to be all in tears; the mourners did not go about the streets indeed, for nobody put on black or made a formal dress of mourning for their nearest friends; but the voice of mourners was truly heard in the streets. The shrieks of women and children at the windows and doors of their houses, where their dearest relations were perhaps dying, or just dead, were so frequent to be heard as we passed the streets, that it was enough to pierce the stoutest heart in the world to hear them. Tears and lamentations were seen almost in every house, especially in the first part of the visitation; for towards the latter end men’s hearts were hardened, and death was so always before their eyes, that they did not so much concern themselves for the loss of their friends, expecting that themselves should be summoned the next hour.

The face of London was—now indeed strangely changed: I mean the entire collection of buildings, the city, neighborhoods, suburbs, Westminster, Southwark, and everything; because as for the specific area called the city, or within the walls, that wasn’t yet much affected. But across the board, the overall appearance of things, I say, was greatly altered; grief and sorrow were visible on every face; and though some areas weren’t yet overwhelmed, everyone looked deeply troubled; and, as we saw the situation clearly worsening, everyone viewed themselves and their families as being in extreme danger. If it were possible to accurately depict those times to those who didn’t experience them, and give the reader a true sense of the horror that was evident everywhere, it would surely leave a lasting impression on their minds and fill them with astonishment. London could well be described as being in tears; mourners didn’t wander the streets in formal garb, since nobody wore black or made a big show of mourning for their closest friends; but the sounds of grief were unmistakably heard in the streets. The cries of women and children at the windows and doors of their homes, where their loved ones were perhaps dying or had just passed away, were so frequently audible as we walked through the streets that it would move even the toughest heart to hear them. Tears and mourning were found in almost every home, especially in the early days of the outbreak; because toward the end, people’s hearts had grown hardened, and with death constantly in their faces, they cared less about losing their loved ones, anticipating that they themselves might be next.

Business led me out sometimes to the other end of the town, even when the sickness was chiefly there; and as the thing was new to me, as well as to everybody else, it was a most surprising thing to see those streets which were usually so thronged now grown desolate, and so few people to be seen in them, that if I had been a stranger and at a loss for my way, I might sometimes have gone the length of a whole street (I mean of the by-streets), and seen nobody to direct me except watchmen set at the doors of such houses as were shut up, of which I shall speak presently.

Business sometimes took me to the other end of town, even though that’s where the sickness was mostly concentrated. Since this was a new experience for me, just like it was for everyone else, it was really surprising to see those usually crowded streets now empty. There were so few people around that if I hadn’t known my way, I could have walked the entire length of a street (I’m talking about the side streets) and only seen watchmen stationed at the doors of the closed-up houses, which I’ll discuss shortly.

One day, being at that part of the town on some special business, curiosity led me to observe things more than usually, and indeed I walked a great way where I had no business. I went up Holborn, and there the street was full of people, but they walked in the middle of the great street, neither on one side or other, because, as I suppose, they would not mingle with anybody that came out of houses, or meet with smells and scent from houses that might be infected.

One day, while I was in that part of town for a specific reason, curiosity got the best of me, and I ended up observing more than I usually would. I walked quite a distance where I had no purpose. I went up Holborn, and the street was packed with people, but they were walking in the middle of the road, avoiding both sidewalks. I assume they did this to steer clear of anyone coming out of the houses or to avoid the smells and scents from those houses that might be contaminated.

The Inns of Court were all shut up; nor were very many of the lawyers in the Temple, or Lincoln’s Inn, or Gray’s Inn, to be seen there. Everybody was at peace; there was no occasion for lawyers; besides, it being in the time of the vacation too, they were generally gone into the country. Whole rows of houses in some places were shut close up, the inhabitants all fled, and only a watchman or two left.

The Inns of Court were all closed; not many lawyers were around in the Temple, Lincoln’s Inn, or Gray’s Inn. Everyone was at peace; there was no need for lawyers. Plus, since it was the vacation period, they had mostly gone out to the countryside. In some areas, whole rows of houses were tightly shut, with the residents having fled, and only a watchman or two left behind.

When I speak of rows of houses being shut up, I do not mean shut up by the magistrates, but that great numbers of persons followed the Court, by the necessity of their employments and other dependences; and as others retired, really frighted with the distemper, it was a mere desolating of some of the streets. But the fright was not yet near so great in the city, abstractly so called, and particularly because, though they were at first in a most inexpressible consternation, yet as I have observed that the distemper intermitted often at first, so they were, as it were, alarmed and unalarmed again, and this several times, till it began to be familiar to them; and that even when it appeared violent, yet seeing it did not presently spread into the city, or the east and south parts, the people began to take courage, and to be, as I may say, a little hardened. It is true a vast many people fled, as I have observed, yet they were chiefly from the west end of the town, and from that we call the heart of the city: that is to say, among the wealthiest of the people, and such people as were unencumbered with trades and business. But of the rest, the generality stayed, and seemed to abide the worst; so that in the place we call the Liberties, and in the suburbs, in Southwark, and in the east part, such as Wapping, Ratcliff, Stepney, Rotherhithe, and the like, the people generally stayed, except here and there a few wealthy families, who, as above, did not depend upon their business.

When I talk about rows of houses being boarded up, I don't mean they were shut down by the authorities, but that a lot of people followed the Court because of their jobs and other obligations. As others left, genuinely scared of the outbreak, it created a sense of emptiness in some streets. However, the fear wasn't as intense in the city itself, especially since, although people were initially in a state of deep shock, they noticed that the illness often came and went at first. They were, in a sense, alarmed and then reassured repeatedly until it began to feel familiar to them. Even when it seemed severe, the fact that it didn't immediately spread into the city or its eastern and southern parts made people a bit braver and more resilient. It's true that many people fled, as I mentioned, but they mostly came from the west end of the town and what we refer to as the heart of the city, meaning the wealthiest residents, particularly those without businesses or trades to worry about. Nevertheless, the majority of people stayed and appeared ready to face the worst. In areas we call the Liberties, along with suburbs like Southwark, and eastern spots such as Wapping, Ratcliff, Stepney, Rotherhithe, and similar places, people generally remained, except for a few wealthy families who, as mentioned, didn’t rely on their businesses.

It must not be forgot here that the city and suburbs were prodigiously full of people at the time of this visitation, I mean at the time that it began; for though I have lived to see a further increase, and mighty throngs of people settling in London more than ever, yet we had always a notion that the numbers of people which, the wars being over, the armies disbanded, and the royal family and the monarchy being restored, had flocked to London to settle in business, or to depend upon and attend the Court for rewards of services, preferments, and the like, was such that the town was computed to have in it above a hundred thousand people more than ever it held before; nay, some took upon them to say it had twice as many, because all the ruined families of the royal party flocked hither. All the old soldiers set up trades here, and abundance of families settled here. Again, the Court brought with them a great flux of pride, and new fashions. All people were grown gay and luxurious, and the joy of the Restoration had brought a vast many families to London.

It’s important to remember that the city and suburbs were incredibly crowded at the time this situation began. Although I have lived to see even more growth and large numbers of people moving to London than ever before, we always had the idea that after the wars ended, the armies were disbanded, and the royal family and monarchy were restored, more than a hundred thousand additional people had come to London to start businesses or to seek favors and positions at court. Some even claimed the population had doubled because all the displaced families from the royal side had come here. Many old soldiers started their own businesses, and a lot of families settled in the area. Additionally, the court brought a wave of pride and new trends. Everyone became more extravagant, and the joy of the Restoration attracted many families to London.

I often thought that as Jerusalem was besieged by the Romans when the Jews were assembled together to celebrate the Passover—by which means an incredible number of people were surprised there who would otherwise have been in other countries—so the plague entered London when an incredible increase of people had happened occasionally, by the particular circumstances above-named. As this conflux of the people to a youthful and gay Court made a great trade in the city, especially in everything that belonged to fashion and finery, so it drew by consequence a great number of workmen, manufacturers, and the like, being mostly poor people who depended upon their labour. And I remember in particular that in a representation to my Lord Mayor of the condition of the poor, it was estimated that there were no less than an hundred thousand riband-weavers in and about the city, the chiefest number of whom lived then in the parishes of Shoreditch, Stepney, Whitechappel, and Bishopsgate, that, namely, about Spitalfields; that is to say, as Spitalfields was then, for it was not so large as now by one fifth part.

I often thought about how, when Jerusalem was under siege by the Romans during Passover, a huge number of people were gathered there who would normally have been in other places. Similarly, the plague entered London during a time when there was a significant increase in the population due to the reasons mentioned above. This influx of people to a vibrant and lively court boosted trade in the city, especially in fashion and luxury items, which attracted many workers, mostly poor individuals who relied on their jobs. I specifically recall that in a report to my Lord Mayor regarding the condition of the poor, it was estimated that there were at least a hundred thousand ribbon weavers in and around the city, with most of them living in the parishes of Shoreditch, Stepney, Whitechapel, and Bishopsgate, particularly around Spitalfields; that is, as Spitalfields was back then, as it was not as large as it is now by about one-fifth.

By this, however, the number of people in the whole may be judged of; and, indeed, I often wondered that, after the prodigious numbers of people that went away at first, there was yet so great a multitude left as it appeared there was.

By this, however, the number of people overall can be assessed; and, in fact, I often found it surprising that after the huge numbers of people who left at first, there were still so many left as it seemed there were.

But I must go back again to the beginning of this surprising time. While the fears of the people were young, they were increased strangely by several odd accidents which, put altogether, it was really a wonder the whole body of the people did not rise as one man and abandon their dwellings, leaving the place as a space of ground designed by Heaven for an Akeldama, doomed to be destroyed from the face of the earth, and that all that would be found in it would perish with it. I shall name but a few of these things; but sure they were so many, and so many wizards and cunning people propagating them, that I have often wondered there was any (women especially) left behind.

But I have to go back to the start of this surprising time. While the people's fears were still fresh, they were strangely intensified by a series of odd incidents. All together, it was truly a wonder that the entire population didn't rise up as one and leave their homes, abandoning the area as if it were a piece of land marked by Heaven as a place of bloodshed, destined to be wiped off the face of the earth, with nothing left to survive. I’ll mention just a few of these occurrences, but there were so many, and so many wizards and tricksters spreading these tales, that I've often wondered if there were any (especially women) left behind.

In the first place, a blazing star or comet appeared for several months before the plague, as there did the year after another, a little before the fire. The old women and the phlegmatic hypochondriac part of the other sex, whom I could almost call old women too, remarked (especially afterward, though not till both those judgements were over) that those two comets passed directly over the city, and that so very near the houses that it was plain they imported something peculiar to the city alone; that the comet before the pestilence was of a faint, dull, languid colour, and its motion very heavy, Solemn, and slow; but that the comet before the fire was bright and sparkling, or, as others said, flaming, and its motion swift and furious; and that, accordingly, one foretold a heavy judgement, slow but severe, terrible and frightful, as was the plague; but the other foretold a stroke, sudden, swift, and fiery as the conflagration. Nay, so particular some people were, that as they looked upon that comet preceding the fire, they fancied that they not only saw it pass swiftly and fiercely, and could perceive the motion with their eye, but even they heard it; that it made a rushing, mighty noise, fierce and terrible, though at a distance, and but just perceivable.

First of all, a blazing star or comet appeared for several months before the plague, just like it did the year after, right before the fire. The older women and the laid-back, overly cautious men, whom I could almost call old women too, pointed out (especially later, though not until both events had happened) that those two comets passed directly over the city, so close to the houses that it was clear they were signaling something specific to the city alone; that the comet before the plague had a faint, dull, sluggish color, and moved very slowly, solemnly; whereas the comet before the fire was bright and sparkling, or as some others said, flaming, and moved quickly and violently; and that, consequently, one predicted a slow but severe judgment that was terrible and frightening, like the plague; but the other predicted a sudden, swift, and fiery blow like the fire. In fact, some people were so particular that as they observed that comet preceding the fire, they believed they not only saw it move swiftly and fiercely, perceiving its motion with their eyes, but also heard it; that it made a rushing, powerful noise, fierce and terrifying, even though it was in the distance and barely noticeable.

I saw both these stars, and, I must confess, had so much of the common notion of such things in my head, that I was apt to look upon them as the forerunners and warnings of God’s judgements; and especially when, after the plague had followed the first, I yet saw another of the like kind, I could not but say God had not yet sufficiently scourged the city.

I saw both of these stars, and I have to admit that I was so influenced by the usual ideas about these kinds of things that I tended to view them as signs and warnings of God’s judgments; especially when, after the plague followed the first star, I saw another one like it. I couldn’t help but think that God had not yet punished the city enough.

But I could not at the same time carry these things to the height that others did, knowing, too, that natural causes are assigned by the astronomers for such things, and that their motions and even their revolutions are calculated, or pretended to be calculated, so that they cannot be so perfectly called the forerunners or foretellers, much less the procurers, of such events as pestilence, war, fire, and the like.

But I couldn't elevate these ideas to the same level that others did, especially knowing that astronomers attribute natural causes to these phenomena and that their movements and even their orbits are measured, or at least claimed to be measured. Therefore, they can't really be considered reliable indicators or predictors, let alone the causes, of events like plagues, wars, fires, and similar occurrences.

But let my thoughts and the thoughts of the philosophers be, or have been, what they will, these things had a more than ordinary influence upon the minds of the common people, and they had almost universal melancholy apprehensions of some dreadful calamity and judgement coming upon the city; and this principally from the sight of this comet, and the little alarm that was given in December by two people dying at St Giles’s, as above.

But whether my thoughts and the thoughts of the philosophers are what they are, these things had an unusual impact on the minds of ordinary people, who were filled with widespread sorrow and fears of a terrible disaster and judgment facing the city. This was mainly due to the appearance of this comet and the minimal concern raised in December by the deaths of two people at St Giles's, as mentioned above.

The apprehensions of the people were likewise strangely increased by the error of the times; in which, I think, the people, from what principle I cannot imagine, were more addicted to prophecies and astrological conjurations, dreams, and old wives’ tales than ever they were before or since. Whether this unhappy temper was originally raised by the follies of some people who got money by it—that is to say, by printing predictions and prognostications—I know not; but certain it is, books frighted them terribly, such as Lilly’s Almanack, Gadbury’s Astrological Predictions, Poor Robin’s Almanack, and the like; also several pretended religious books, one entitled, Come out of her, my People, lest you be Partaker of her Plagues; another called, Fair Warning; another, Britain’s Remembrancer; and many such, all, or most part of which, foretold, directly or covertly, the ruin of the city. Nay, some were so enthusiastically bold as to run about the streets with their oral predictions, pretending they were sent to preach to the city; and one in particular, who, like Jonah to Nineveh, cried in the streets, ‘Yet forty days, and London shall be destroyed.’ I will not be positive whether he said yet forty days or yet a few days. Another ran about naked, except a pair of drawers about his waist, crying day and night, like a man that Josephus mentions, who cried, ‘Woe to Jerusalem!’ a little before the destruction of that city. So this poor naked creature cried, ‘Oh, the great and the dreadful God!’ and said no more, but repeated those words continually, with a voice and countenance full of horror, a swift pace; and nobody could ever find him to stop or rest, or take any sustenance, at least that ever I could hear of. I met this poor creature several times in the streets, and would have spoken to him, but he would not enter into speech with me or any one else, but held on his dismal cries continually.

The people's fears were strangely heightened by the errors of the time; it seems like they were more obsessed with prophecies, astrology, dreams, and old wives’ tales than ever before or since, though I can't figure out why. Perhaps this unfortunate fixation was sparked by some people making money from it—specifically, by publishing predictions and forecasts. It's clear that books terrified them, like Lilly’s Almanack, Gadbury’s Astrological Predictions, Poor Robin’s Almanack, and similar titles. There were also several supposed religious books, one called "Come out of her, my People, lest you be Partaker of her Plagues," another named "Fair Warning," and yet another called "Britain’s Remembrancer," amongst many others, most of which predicted—either directly or indirectly—the city's ruin. Some were so intensely zealous that they roamed the streets with their oral predictions, claiming they were sent to preach to the city; one particularly went about shouting like Jonah did in Nineveh, “Yet forty days, and London shall be destroyed.” I’m not entirely sure if he said "yet forty days" or "yet a few days." Another person ran around mostly naked, with just a pair of shorts on, crying day and night like a man Josephus mentioned who lamented, “Woe to Jerusalem!” right before that city's destruction. This poor naked fellow exclaimed, “Oh, the great and the dreadful God!” and said nothing else, just repeating those words over and over, with a voice and face full of terror, moving quickly; no one could ever find him to get him to stop or rest or even eat, at least not that I ever heard of. I saw this poor soul several times in the streets and wanted to talk to him, but he wouldn’t engage with me or anyone else, just kept up his mournful cries.

These things terrified the people to the last degree, and especially when two or three times, as I have mentioned already, they found one or two in the bills dead of the plague at St Giles’s.

These things scared the people to their core, especially when, as I mentioned earlier, they found one or two dead from the plague in the bills at St Giles’s.

Next to these public things were the dreams of old women, or, I should say, the interpretation of old women upon other people’s dreams; and these put abundance of people even out of their wits. Some heard voices warning them to be gone, for that there would be such a plague in London, so that the living would not be able to bury the dead. Others saw apparitions in the air; and I must be allowed to say of both, I hope without breach of charity, that they heard voices that never spake, and saw sights that never appeared; but the imagination of the people was really turned wayward and possessed. And no wonder, if they who were poring continually at the clouds saw shapes and figures, representations and appearances, which had nothing in them but air, and vapour. Here they told us they saw a flaming sword held in a hand coming out of a cloud, with a point hanging directly over the city; there they saw hearses and coffins in the air carrying to be buried; and there again, heaps of dead bodies lying unburied, and the like, just as the imagination of the poor terrified people furnished them with matter to work upon.

Next to these public matters were the dreams of old women, or rather, how old women interpreted other people's dreams; and these drove many people to madness. Some heard voices warning them to leave because a terrible plague would hit London, making it impossible for the living to bury the dead. Others saw figures in the air; and I must say, without being unkind, that they heard voices that never spoke and saw sights that never existed; but the people's imaginations really ran wild and took over. It's no surprise that those who gazed constantly at the clouds saw shapes and images, representations and visions, that were nothing but air and vapor. Here they claimed to see a flaming sword held by a hand emerging from a cloud, pointed directly at the city; there they saw hearses and coffins in the air, ready to be buried; and again, piles of unburied dead bodies, just as the terrified people's imaginations provided material for their fears.

So hypochondriac fancies represent
Ships, armies, battles in the firmament;
Till steady eyes the exhalations solve,
And all to its first matter, cloud, resolve.

So hypochondriac fantasies look like
Ships, armies, and battles in the sky;
Until steady eyes figure out the vapors,
And everything returns to its original state, cloud.

I could fill this account with the strange relations such people gave every day of what they had seen; and every one was so positive of their having seen what they pretended to see, that there was no contradicting them without breach of friendship, or being accounted rude and unmannerly on the one hand, and profane and impenetrable on the other. One time before the plague was begun (otherwise than as I have said in St Giles’s), I think it was in March, seeing a crowd of people in the street, I joined with them to satisfy my curiosity, and found them all staring up into the air to see what a woman told them appeared plain to her, which was an angel clothed in white, with a fiery sword in his hand, waving it or brandishing it over his head. She described every part of the figure to the life, showed them the motion and the form, and the poor people came into it so eagerly, and with so much readiness; ‘Yes, I see it all plainly,’ says one; ‘there’s the sword as plain as can be.’ Another saw the angel. One saw his very face, and cried out what a glorious creature he was! One saw one thing, and one another. I looked as earnestly as the rest, but perhaps not with so much willingness to be imposed upon; and I said, indeed, that I could see nothing but a white cloud, bright on one side by the shining of the sun upon the other part. The woman endeavoured to show it me, but could not make me confess that I saw it, which, indeed, if I had I must have lied. But the woman, turning upon me, looked in my face, and fancied I laughed, in which her imagination deceived her too, for I really did not laugh, but was very seriously reflecting how the poor people were terrified by the force of their own imagination. However, she turned from me, called me profane fellow, and a scoffer; told me that it was a time of God’s anger, and dreadful judgements were approaching, and that despisers such as I should wander and perish.

I could fill this account with the strange stories people shared every day about what they claimed to have seen. Everyone was so convinced they had seen what they said they saw that you couldn’t contradict them without risking a friendship or being seen as rude and inconsiderate on one hand, and blasphemous and hard to understand on the other. One time, before the plague started (other than what I mentioned in St. Giles’s), I think it was in March, I saw a crowd of people in the street. I joined them out of curiosity and found them all looking up into the air, captivated by a woman who claimed to see something clear—a white-clothed angel with a fiery sword in his hand, waving or brandishing it overhead. She described every part of the figure in detail, showing them the movements and the shape, and the poor people bought into it so eagerly, saying things like, "Yes, I see it all clearly," or "There’s the sword as clear as can be." One person claimed to see the angel, another thought they saw his face, exclaiming how glorious he was! Each person saw something different. I looked as intently as the others, but maybe not with the same eagerness to be fooled. I said I could see nothing but a white cloud, brightly lit on one side by the sun shining on the other. The woman tried to point it out to me, but she couldn’t make me admit that I saw it, and if I had, it would have been a lie. But then the woman turned to me, looked me in the eye, and thought I was laughing, which was a mistake on her part because I wasn’t laughing at all; I was seriously contemplating how terrified the poor people were by the power of their imagination. Nevertheless, she turned away from me, called me a disrespectful person and a scoffer, and warned me that this was a time of God’s anger, that dreadful judgments were coming, and that people like me who despised the truth would wander and perish.

The people about her seemed disgusted as well as she; and I found there was no persuading them that I did not laugh at them, and that I should be rather mobbed by them than be able to undeceive them. So I left them; and this appearance passed for as real as the blazing star itself.

The people around her looked as disgusted as she felt; and I realized that there was no convincing them that I wasn't laughing at them, and that I would be attacked by them rather than be able to change their minds. So, I walked away from them; and this impression seemed just as real as the blazing star itself.

Another encounter I had in the open day also; and this was in going through a narrow passage from Petty France into Bishopsgate Churchyard, by a row of alms-houses. There are two churchyards to Bishopsgate church or parish; one we go over to pass from the place called Petty France into Bishopsgate Street, coming out just by the church door; the other is on the side of the narrow passage where the alms-houses are on the left; and a dwarf-wall with a palisado on it on the right hand, and the city wall on the other side more to the right.

I had another encounter during the open day as well; this time while walking through a narrow passage from Petty France to Bishopsgate Churchyard, alongside a row of alms-houses. There are two churchyards for Bishopsgate church or parish; one we cross to get from Petty France to Bishopsgate Street, coming out right by the church door; the other is on the side of the narrow passage where the alms-houses are on the left, a low wall with a fence on it to the right, and the city wall further to the right.

In this narrow passage stands a man looking through between the palisadoes into the burying-place, and as many people as the narrowness of the passage would admit to stop, without hindering the passage of others, and he was talking mightily eagerly to them, and pointing now to one place, then to another, and affirming that he saw a ghost walking upon such a gravestone there. He described the shape, the posture, and the movement of it so exactly that it was the greatest matter of amazement to him in the world that everybody did not see it as well as he. On a sudden he would cry, ‘There it is; now it comes this way.’ Then, ’Tis turned back’; till at length he persuaded the people into so firm a belief of it, that one fancied he saw it, and another fancied he saw it; and thus he came every day making a strange hubbub, considering it was in so narrow a passage, till Bishopsgate clock struck eleven, and then the ghost would seem to start, and, as if he were called away, disappeared on a sudden.

In this narrow passage, a man stands looking between the wooden barriers into the graveyard. As many people as the tight space allows stop without blocking others, and he's talking very eagerly to them, pointing now to one spot, then to another, insisting that he sees a ghost walking on a certain gravestone over there. He described its shape, posture, and movement so precisely that he was amazed that everyone didn’t see it just like he did. Suddenly, he would cry out, “There it is; now it’s coming this way.” Then, “Now it’s turned back,” until eventually, he convinced the crowd so firmly that one thought he saw it, and another thought he saw it too. Every day, he created quite a commotion in that narrow passage until Bishopsgate clock struck eleven, and then the ghost would seem to startle and, as if called away, would disappear suddenly.

I looked earnestly every way, and at the very moment that this man directed, but could not see the least appearance of anything; but so positive was this poor man, that he gave the people the vapours in abundance, and sent them away trembling and frighted, till at length few people that knew of it cared to go through that passage, and hardly anybody by night on any account whatever.

I looked around carefully, and just as this man was pointing, I couldn’t see anything at all; but this poor guy was so convincing that he terrified people and made them leave shaken and scared. Eventually, very few people who heard about it wanted to go through that passage, and hardly anyone would do it at night for any reason.

This ghost, as the poor man affirmed, made signs to the houses, and to the ground, and to the people, plainly intimating, or else they so understanding it, that abundance of the people should come to be buried in that churchyard, as indeed happened; but that he saw such aspects I must acknowledge I never believed, nor could I see anything of it myself, though I looked most earnestly to see it, if possible.

This ghost, as the unfortunate man claimed, pointed to the houses, the ground, and the people, clearly suggesting—or at least that's how they understood it—that many people would end up being buried in that churchyard, which indeed happened; however, I must admit that I never believed he saw such things, nor could I see any of it myself, even though I looked very hard to try to see it, if I could.

These things serve to show how far the people were really overcome with delusions; and as they had a notion of the approach of a visitation, all their predictions ran upon a most dreadful plague, which should lay the whole city, and even the kingdom, waste, and should destroy almost all the nation, both man and beast.

These things demonstrate how deeply the people were consumed by their delusions; since they believed a disaster was coming, all their predictions focused on a horrifying plague that would devastate the entire city and even the kingdom, nearly wiping out the nation, both humans and animals.

To this, as I said before, the astrologers added stories of the conjunctions of planets in a malignant manner and with a mischievous influence, one of which conjunctions was to happen, and did happen, in October, and the other in November; and they filled the people’s heads with predictions on these signs of the heavens, intimating that those conjunctions foretold drought, famine, and pestilence. In the two first of them, however, they were entirely mistaken, for we had no droughty season, but in the beginning of the year a hard frost, which lasted from December almost to March, and after that moderate weather, rather warm than hot, with refreshing winds, and, in short, very seasonable weather, and also several very great rains.

To this, as I mentioned earlier, the astrologers added tales of the planets aligning in a harmful way with a sneaky influence, one of which occurred in October and the other in November. They filled people's heads with predictions based on these celestial signs, suggesting that those alignments predicted drought, famine, and disease. However, in the first two predictions, they were completely wrong, as we didn't have a dry season. Instead, we experienced a harsh frost at the start of the year, lasting from December almost to March, followed by mild weather, more warm than hot, with refreshing breezes, and overall very seasonal weather, including several heavy rains.

Some endeavours were used to suppress the printing of such books as terrified the people, and to frighten the dispersers of them, some of whom were taken up; but nothing was done in it, as I am informed, the Government being unwilling to exasperate the people, who were, as I may say, all out of their wits already.

Some efforts were made to stop the printing of books that scared people, and to intimidate those who distributed them; some of these individuals were arrested. However, nothing effective was accomplished, as I've heard, because the Government didn't want to further anger the people, who were already, you could say, beside themselves.

Neither can I acquit those ministers that in their sermons rather sank than lifted up the hearts of their hearers. Many of them no doubt did it for the strengthening the resolution of the people, and especially for quickening them to repentance, but it certainly answered not their end, at least not in proportion to the injury it did another way; and indeed, as God Himself through the whole Scriptures rather draws to Him by invitations and calls to turn to Him and live, than drives us by terror and amazement, so I must confess I thought the ministers should have done also, imitating our blessed Lord and Master in this, that His whole Gospel is full of declarations from heaven of God’s mercy, and His readiness to receive penitents and forgive them, complaining, ‘Ye will not come unto Me that ye may have life’, and that therefore His Gospel is called the Gospel of Peace and the Gospel of Grace.

I can’t excuse those ministers whose sermons brought down rather than lifted up the spirits of their listeners. Many of them likely intended to strengthen the people's resolve and encourage them to repent, but it clearly didn't achieve that goal, at least not in comparison to the harm it caused in other ways. In fact, just as God Himself throughout the Scriptures draws us toward Him with invitations and calls to turn to Him and live, rather than pushing us away with fear and shock, I believe the ministers should have done the same. They should have followed our blessed Lord and Master, whose entire Gospel is filled with messages from heaven about God's mercy and His willingness to welcome and forgive those who repent, lamenting, “You will not come to Me so that you may have life.” That’s why His Gospel is known as the Gospel of Peace and the Gospel of Grace.

But we had some good men, and that of all persuasions and opinions, whose discourses were full of terror, who spoke nothing but dismal things; and as they brought the people together with a kind of horror, sent them away in tears, prophesying nothing but evil tidings, terrifying the people with the apprehensions of being utterly destroyed, not guiding them, at least not enough, to cry to heaven for mercy.

But we had some good people, from all backgrounds and beliefs, whose conversations were filled with fear, who talked only about grim things; and while they gathered the crowd with a sense of dread, they sent them away in tears, predicting nothing but bad news, scaring people with the fear of complete destruction, not really guiding them, at least not enough, to call out to heaven for mercy.

It was, indeed, a time of very unhappy breaches among us in matters of religion. Innumerable sects and divisions and separate opinions prevailed among the people. The Church of England was restored, indeed, with the restoration of the monarchy, about four years before; but the ministers and preachers of the Presbyterians and Independents, and of all the other sorts of professions, had begun to gather separate societies and erect altar against altar, and all those had their meetings for worship apart, as they have now, but not so many then, the Dissenters being not thoroughly formed into a body as they are since; and those congregations which were thus gathered together were yet but few. And even those that were, the Government did not allow, but endeavoured to suppress them and shut up their meetings.

It was definitely a time of deep divisions among us in terms of religion. Countless sects, divisions, and differing opinions existed among the people. The Church of England was restored with the monarchy's return about four years earlier, but the ministers and preachers from the Presbyterians, Independents, and various other groups had started to form separate societies and set up altars against altars. They held worship meetings apart from each other, as they do now, although there were fewer then, as the Dissenters had not yet fully organized into a group like they have since. The congregations that did come together were still quite few, and the Government didn’t permit them, attempting to suppress these meetings and close them down.

But the visitation reconciled them again, at least for a time, and many of the best and most valuable ministers and preachers of the Dissenters were suffered to go into the churches where the incumbents were fled away, as many were, not being able to stand it; and the people flocked without distinction to hear them preach, not much inquiring who or what opinion they were of. But after the sickness was over, that spirit of charity abated; and every church being again supplied with their own ministers, or others presented where the minister was dead, things returned to their old channel again.

But the visit brought them back together again, at least for a while, and many of the best and most respected ministers and preachers from the Dissenters were allowed to go into the churches where the regular ministers had fled, as many did because they couldn’t handle it; and the people came in droves to hear them preach, not really caring who they were or what their beliefs were. But after the sickness passed, that spirit of generosity faded; and once each church was supplied with their own ministers, or others were appointed where the minister had died, things went back to the way they were before.

One mischief always introduces another. These terrors and apprehensions of the people led them into a thousand weak, foolish, and wicked things, which they wanted not a sort of people really wicked to encourage them to: and this was running about to fortune-tellers, cunning-men, and astrologers to know their fortune, or, as it is vulgarly expressed, to have their fortunes told them, their nativities calculated, and the like; and this folly presently made the town swarm with a wicked generation of pretenders to magic, to the black art, as they called it, and I know not what; nay, to a thousand worse dealings with the devil than they were really guilty of. And this trade grew so open and so generally practised that it became common to have signs and inscriptions set up at doors: ‘Here lives a fortune-teller’, ‘Here lives an astrologer’, ‘Here you may have your nativity calculated’, and the like; and Friar Bacon’s brazen-head, which was the usual sign of these people’s dwellings, was to be seen almost in every street, or else the sign of Mother Shipton, or of Merlin’s head, and the like.

One mischief always leads to another. The fears and worries of the people drove them to do all sorts of weak, silly, and wicked things, which they wouldn’t have done without a genuinely wicked group to encourage them. This included running to fortune-tellers, charlatans, and astrologers to learn their fate, or as people commonly say, to have their fortunes told, their birth charts calculated, and so on. This foolishness quickly turned the town into a hotspot for a corrupt generation of self-proclaimed magicians, calling themselves practitioners of the "black art," among other things; indeed, there were many worse dealings with the devil than they were actually guilty of. This practice became so widespread and openly accepted that it became normal to see signs and advertisements outside homes: "Here lives a fortune-teller," "Here lives an astrologer," "You can have your birth chart calculated here," and similar messages. Friar Bacon’s brazen head, the typical sign of these people's homes, could be found in almost every street, along with the signs of Mother Shipton, Merlin’s head, and others like them.

With what blind, absurd, and ridiculous stuff these oracles of the devil pleased and satisfied the people I really know not, but certain it is that innumerable attendants crowded about their doors every day. And if but a grave fellow in a velvet jacket, a band, and a black coat, which was the habit those quack-conjurers generally went in, was but seen in the streets the people would follow them in crowds, and ask them questions as they went along.

I really don't know what kind of blind, absurd, and ridiculous nonsense these devil's oracles used to entertain and satisfy the people, but it's clear that countless followers gathered around their doors every day. If a serious guy in a velvet jacket, a band, and a black coat—which was the typical outfit for these fake conjurers—was spotted in the streets, people would flock to him, bombarding him with questions as he walked by.

I need not mention what a horrid delusion this was, or what it tended to; but there was no remedy for it till the plague itself put an end to it all—and, I suppose, cleared the town of most of those calculators themselves. One mischief was, that if the poor people asked these mock astrologers whether there would be a plague or no, they all agreed in general to answer ‘Yes’, for that kept up their trade. And had the people not been kept in a fright about that, the wizards would presently have been rendered useless, and their craft had been at an end. But they always talked to them of such-and-such influences of the stars, of the conjunctions of such-and-such planets, which must necessarily bring sickness and distempers, and consequently the plague. And some had the assurance to tell them the plague was begun already, which was too true, though they that said so knew nothing of the matter.

I don’t need to say what a terrible delusion this was or what it led to; however, there was no solution for it until the plague itself ended everything—and, I guess, cleared the town of most of those frauds. One problem was that when desperate people asked these fake astrologers whether there would be a plague or not, they all agreed to say ‘Yes’ because it kept their business going. If the people hadn’t been so scared about that, those frauds would quickly have become irrelevant, and their tricks would have come to an end. But they always spoke to them about certain influences of the stars and the alignments of specific planets that must inevitably cause illness and, therefore, the plague. Some even had the nerve to say that the plague had already begun, which was sadly true, even though those who said it knew nothing about the situation.

The ministers, to do them justice, and preachers of most sorts that were serious and understanding persons, thundered against these and other wicked practices, and exposed the folly as well as the wickedness of them together, and the most sober and judicious people despised and abhorred them. But it was impossible to make any impression upon the middling people and the working labouring poor. Their fears were predominant over all their passions, and they threw away their money in a most distracted manner upon those whimsies. Maid-servants especially, and men-servants, were the chief of their customers, and their question generally was, after the first demand of ‘Will there be a plague?’ I say, the next question was, ‘Oh, sir I for the Lord’s sake, what will become of me? Will my mistress keep me, or will she turn me off? Will she stay here, or will she go into the country? And if she goes into the country, will she take me with her, or leave me here to be starved and undone?’ And the like of menservants.

The ministers, to give them credit, along with most serious and thoughtful preachers, strongly condemned these and other immoral practices, highlighting both their foolishness and wickedness. The most sensible and discerning people looked down on and hated them. However, it was impossible to make any impact on the average folks and the working poor. Their fears overshadowed all their emotions, and they spent their money in a completely chaotic way on these oddities. Maidservants, in particular, and male servants were their main customers, and their most common question, after asking, “Will there be a plague?” was, “Oh, sir, for the Lord’s sake, what will happen to me? Will my mistress keep me, or will she let me go? Will she stay here, or will she go to the countryside? And if she goes to the countryside, will she take me with her, or leave me here to be starved and left with nothing?” The same went for the male servants.

The truth is, the case of poor servants was very dismal, as I shall have occasion to mention again by-and-by, for it was apparent a prodigious number of them would be turned away, and it was so. And of them abundance perished, and particularly of those that these false prophets had flattered with hopes that they should be continued in their services, and carried with their masters and mistresses into the country; and had not public charity provided for these poor creatures, whose number was exceeding great and in all cases of this nature must be so, they would have been in the worst condition of any people in the city.

The truth is, the situation for poor servants was very grim, as I will mention again soon, because it was clear that a huge number of them would be let go, and that turned out to be the case. Many of them died, especially those who had been misled by false promises that they would keep their jobs and follow their employers into the countryside; and if public charity hadn't stepped in to help these unfortunate individuals, whose numbers were extremely high and always tend to be in situations like this, they would have been the most destitute people in the city.

These things agitated the minds of the common people for many months, while the first apprehensions were upon them, and while the plague was not, as I may say, yet broken out. But I must also not forget that the more serious part of the inhabitants behaved after another manner. The Government encouraged their devotion, and appointed public prayers and days of fasting and humiliation, to make public confession of sin and implore the mercy of God to avert the dreadful judgement which hung over their heads; and it is not to be expressed with what alacrity the people of all persuasions embraced the occasion; how they flocked to the churches and meetings, and they were all so thronged that there was often no coming near, no, not to the very doors of the largest churches. Also there were daily prayers appointed morning and evening at several churches, and days of private praying at other places; at all which the people attended, I say, with an uncommon devotion. Several private families also, as well of one opinion as of another, kept family fasts, to which they admitted their near relations only. So that, in a word, those people who were really serious and religious applied themselves in a truly Christian manner to the proper work of repentance and humiliation, as a Christian people ought to do.

These issues troubled the minds of ordinary people for many months while they were first starting to worry, and while the plague had not yet actually broken out. However, I must also mention that the more serious members of the community acted differently. The Government encouraged their devotion and organized public prayers and days of fasting and humility, to publicly confess their sins and ask for God's mercy to prevent the terrible judgment looming over them. It's incredible to see how eagerly people from all backgrounds took part; they crowded into churches and gatherings, often to the point that there was no room to even approach the doors of the largest churches. Daily prayers were scheduled for morning and evening at various churches, along with days of private prayer in other locations, all of which people attended with remarkable devotion. Many private families, regardless of their beliefs, held family fasts, inviting only close relatives. In summary, those who were genuinely serious and religious engaged in a truly Christian way in the necessary work of repentance and humility, as any Christian community should.

Again, the public showed that they would bear their share in these things; the very Court, which was then gay and luxurious, put on a face of just concern for the public danger. All the plays and interludes which, after the manner of the French Court, had been set up, and began to increase among us, were forbid to act; the gaming-tables, public dancing-rooms, and music-houses, which multiplied and began to debauch the manners of the people, were shut up and suppressed; and the jack-puddings, merry-andrews, puppet-shows, rope-dancers, and such-like doings, which had bewitched the poor common people, shut up their shops, finding indeed no trade; for the minds of the people were agitated with other things, and a kind of sadness and horror at these things sat upon the countenances even of the common people. Death was before their eyes, and everybody began to think of their graves, not of mirth and diversions.

Once again, the public demonstrated their willingness to contribute to these matters; even the Court, which was then lively and extravagant, pretended to care about the public's safety. All the plays and performances that had been established, following the French Court's example, were banned from being performed. The gambling tables, public dance halls, and music venues that had multiplied and started to corrupt the people's morals were shut down and prohibited; the entertainers, clowns, puppet shows, tightrope walkers, and similar acts that had captivated the common folk were forced to close their businesses, as they found there were no customers. The people's minds were preoccupied with other concerns, and a sense of sadness and dread was evident on the faces of even the ordinary citizens. Death loomed in their thoughts, and everyone began to contemplate their own graves instead of seeking joy and entertainment.

But even those wholesome reflections—which, rightly managed, would have most happily led the people to fall upon their knees, make confession of their sins, and look up to their merciful Saviour for pardon, imploring His compassion on them in such a time of their distress, by which we might have been as a second Nineveh—had a quite contrary extreme in the common people, who, ignorant and stupid in their reflections as they were brutishly wicked and thoughtless before, were now led by their fright to extremes of folly; and, as I have said before, that they ran to conjurers and witches, and all sorts of deceivers, to know what should become of them (who fed their fears, and kept them always alarmed and awake on purpose to delude them and pick their pockets), so they were as mad upon their running after quacks and mountebanks, and every practising old woman, for medicines and remedies; storing themselves with such multitudes of pills, potions, and preservatives, as they were called, that they not only spent their money but even poisoned themselves beforehand for fear of the poison of the infection; and prepared their bodies for the plague, instead of preserving them against it. On the other hand it is incredible and scarce to be imagined, how the posts of houses and corners of streets were plastered over with doctors’ bills and papers of ignorant fellows, quacking and tampering in physic, and inviting the people to come to them for remedies, which was generally set off with such flourishes as these, viz.: ‘Infallible preventive pills against the plague.’ ‘Neverfailing preservatives against the infection.’ ‘Sovereign cordials against the corruption of the air.’ ‘Exact regulations for the conduct of the body in case of an infection.’ ‘Anti-pestilential pills.’ ‘Incomparable drink against the plague, never found out before.’ ‘An universal remedy for the plague.’ ‘The only true plague water.’ ‘The royal antidote against all kinds of infection’;—and such a number more that I cannot reckon up; and if I could, would fill a book of themselves to set them down.

But even those positive thoughts—which, if handled correctly, could have led people to kneel, confess their sins, and seek forgiveness from their merciful Savior during such a time of distress, allowing us to become a second Nineveh—were turned upside down among the common folk. Ignorant and foolish in their thoughts, just as they were wicked and careless before, they were now driven by their fear to extreme foolishness. As I mentioned earlier, they ran to conjurers, witches, and all sorts of fraudsters to learn what would happen to them (who preyed on their fears and kept them anxious and restless just to trick them and steal their money). They also became obsessed with chasing after quacks and charlatans, as well as every old woman practicing herbal remedies, piling up on all sorts of pills, potions, and so-called preventatives. They not only wasted their money but even poisoned themselves in their panic about the infection, preparing their bodies for the plague instead of protecting them against it. On the flip side, it's incredible and hard to imagine how the posts of houses and corners of streets were plastered with doctors’ bills and notices from ignorant people peddling fake medicine. They invited people to come to them for remedies, often highlighted with exaggerated claims like: ‘Infallible preventive pills against the plague.’ ‘Never-failing preservatives against the infection.’ ‘Sovereign cordials against the corruption of the air.’ ‘Exact guidelines for the body’s conduct in case of infection.’ ‘Anti-pestilential pills.’ ‘Unmatched drink against the plague, never discovered before.’ ‘A universal remedy for the plague.’ ‘The only true plague water.’ ‘The royal antidote against all kinds of infection’;—and so many more that I can't count them all; and even if I could, it would fill a book just to list them.

Others set up bills to summon people to their lodgings for directions and advice in the case of infection. These had specious titles also, such as these:—

Others put up notices to invite people to their homes for guidance and advice in case of infection. These also had misleading titles, like these:—

‘An eminent High Dutch physician, newly come over from Holland, where he resided during all the time of the great plague last year in Amsterdam, and cured multitudes of people that actually had the plague upon them.’

‘A prominent Dutch doctor, who had just arrived from Holland, where he lived throughout the devastating plague in Amsterdam last year and treated countless people who were actually suffering from the plague.’

‘An Italian gentlewoman just arrived from Naples, having a choice secret to prevent infection, which she found out by her great experience, and did wonderful cures with it in the late plague there, wherein there died 20,000 in one day.’

‘An Italian lady just arrived from Naples, bringing with her a special secret to prevent infection, which she discovered through her vast experience, and she performed amazing cures with it during the recent plague there, where 20,000 people died in a single day.’

‘An ancient gentlewoman, having practised with great success in the late plague in this city, anno 1636, gives her advice only to the female sex. To be spoken with,’ &c.

‘An older woman, having successfully practiced during the last plague in this city, in the year 1636, shares her advice solely for women. To be spoken with,’ &c.

‘An experienced physician, who has long studied the doctrine of antidotes against all sorts of poison and infection, has, after forty years’ practice, arrived to such skill as may, with God’s blessing, direct persons how to prevent their being touched by any contagious distemper whatsoever. He directs the poor gratis.’

‘An experienced doctor, who has spent many years studying the science of antidotes for all kinds of poison and infection, has, after forty years of practice, developed the expertise to guide people on how to avoid getting infected by any contagious disease. He offers his services to the poor for free.’

I take notice of these by way of specimen. I could give you two or three dozen of the like and yet have abundance left behind. ’Tis sufficient from these to apprise any one of the humour of those times, and how a set of thieves and pickpockets not only robbed and cheated the poor people of their money, but poisoned their bodies with odious and fatal preparations; some with mercury, and some with other things as bad, perfectly remote from the thing pretended to, and rather hurtful than serviceable to the body in case an infection followed.

I notice these as examples. I could provide you with two or three dozen more like them and still have plenty left over. It's enough to give anyone an idea of the attitudes of those times and how a group of thieves and pickpockets not only stole from and deceived poor people out of their money but also harmed them with disgusting and deadly concoctions; some with mercury, and others with equally harmful substances, completely unrelated to what was claimed and more damaging than helpful to the body if an infection occurred.

I cannot omit a subtility of one of those quack operators, with which he gulled the poor people to crowd about him, but did nothing for them without money. He had, it seems, added to his bills, which he gave about the streets, this advertisement in capital letters, viz., ‘He gives advice to the poor for nothing.’

I can't ignore a trick used by one of those charlatans, who fooled the poor people into gathering around him but did nothing for them unless they paid. Apparently, he had added to his flyers, which he handed out on the streets, this ad in big letters: 'He gives advice to the poor for free.'

Abundance of poor people came to him accordingly, to whom he made a great many fine speeches, examined them of the state of their health and of the constitution of their bodies, and told them many good things for them to do, which were of no great moment. But the issue and conclusion of all was, that he had a preparation which if they took such a quantity of every morning, he would pawn his life they should never have the plague; no, though they lived in the house with people that were infected. This made the people all resolve to have it; but then the price of that was so much, I think ’twas half-a-crown. ‘But, sir,’ says one poor woman, ‘I am a poor almswoman and am kept by the parish, and your bills say you give the poor your help for nothing.’ ‘Ay, good woman,’ says the doctor, ‘so I do, as I published there. I give my advice to the poor for nothing, but not my physic.’ ‘Alas, sir!’ says she, ‘that is a snare laid for the poor, then; for you give them advice for nothing; that is to say, you advise them gratis, to buy your physic for their money; so does every shop-keeper with his wares.’ Here the woman began to give him ill words, and stood at his door all that day, telling her tale to all the people that came, till the doctor finding she turned away his customers, was obliged to call her upstairs again, and give her his box of physic for nothing, which perhaps, too, was good for nothing when she had it.

A lot of poor people came to him, and he gave them many nice speeches, checked on their health and physical condition, and suggested various things for them to do, none of which were very important. But the main point was that he claimed he had a remedy that, if they took a certain amount every morning, would guarantee they would never get the plague, even if they lived with infected people. This convinced the people to want it; however, the cost was steep—around half a crown. “But, sir,” said one poor woman, “I’m just a charity case and depend on the parish, and your advertisements say you help the poor for free.” “Yes, good woman,” the doctor replied, “and I do, as I stated. I offer my advice to the poor for free, but not my medicine.” “Oh dear!” she said, “that’s a trap for the poor, then; you give them advice for free, meaning they should use their money to buy your medicine; just like every shopkeeper does with their goods.” At this point, the woman started criticizing him and stood at his door all day, telling her story to everyone who came by, until the doctor, realizing she was turning away his customers, had to call her back upstairs and give her a box of medicine for free, which might have been worthless anyway.

But to return to the people, whose confusions fitted them to be imposed upon by all sorts of pretenders and by every mountebank. There is no doubt but these quacking sort of fellows raised great gains out of the miserable people, for we daily found the crowds that ran after them were infinitely greater, and their doors were more thronged than those of Dr Brooks, Dr Upton, Dr Hodges, Dr Berwick, or any, though the most famous men of the time. And I was told that some of them got five pounds a day by their physic.

But to get back to the people, whose confusion made it easy for all kinds of frauds and charlatans to take advantage of them. It's clear that these quack types made a lot of money off the suffering people, because we often saw that the crowds chasing after them were way bigger, and their doors were busier than those of Dr. Brooks, Dr. Upton, Dr. Hodges, Dr. Berwick, or any of the other famous people of the time. I heard that some of them made five pounds a day from their remedies.

But there was still another madness beyond all this, which may serve to give an idea of the distracted humour of the poor people at that time: and this was their following a worse sort of deceivers than any of these; for these petty thieves only deluded them to pick their pockets and get their money, in which their wickedness, whatever it was, lay chiefly on the side of the deceivers, not upon the deceived. But in this part I am going to mention, it lay chiefly in the people deceived, or equally in both; and this was in wearing charms, philtres, exorcisms, amulets, and I know not what preparations, to fortify the body with them against the plague; as if the plague was not the hand of God, but a kind of possession of an evil spirit, and that it was to be kept off with crossings, signs of the zodiac, papers tied up with so many knots, and certain words or figures written on them, as particularly the word Abracadabra, formed in triangle or pyramid, thus:—

But there was another kind of madness beyond all this, which shows just how confused the poor people were at that time: they started following a worse kind of trickster than any of these; because these petty thieves only fooled them to steal their money, meaning the real wrongdoing was mostly on the part of the deceivers, not the deceived. However, in what I'm about to mention, the blame lay mostly with the deceived, or was shared equally; and this involved wearing charms, love potions, rituals, amulets, and all sorts of preparations to protect themselves from the plague. They acted as if the plague wasn’t a punishment from God, but instead a kind of possession by an evil spirit, which could be fended off with crosses, zodiac signs, papers tied in knots, and specific words or symbols written on them, especially the word Abracadabra, arranged in a triangle or pyramid, like this:—

     ABRACADABRA
     ABRACADABR     Others had the Jesuits’
     ABRACADAB         mark in a cross:
     ABRACADA             I H
     ABRACAD               S.
     ABRACA
     ABRAC          Others nothing but this
     ABRA               mark, thus:
     ABR
     AB                   * *
     A                    {*}
     ABRACADABRA
     ABRACADABR     Others had the Jesuits’ 
     ABRACAD         mark in a cross: 
     ABRACADA             I H 
     ABRACAD               S. 
     ABRACA 
     ABRAC          Others nothing but this 
     ABRA               mark, thus: 
     ABR 
     AB                   * * 
     A                    {*}

I might spend a great deal of time in my exclamations against the follies, and indeed the wickedness, of those things, in a time of such danger, in a matter of such consequences as this, of a national infection. But my memorandums of these things relate rather to take notice only of the fact, and mention only that it was so. How the poor people found the insufficiency of those things, and how many of them were afterwards carried away in the dead-carts and thrown into the common graves of every parish with these hellish charms and trumpery hanging about their necks, remains to be spoken of as we go along.

I could spend a lot of time ranting about the foolishness and even the evil of those things, especially in such a dangerous time and with such serious consequences for the nation. But my notes on this matter mainly just highlight the fact that it happened and mention that it did. We will also discuss how the poor people realized these things were insufficient and how many of them were later taken away in the dead carts and buried in the common graves of each parish, with those cursed charms and junk hanging around their necks, as we continue.

All this was the effect of the hurry the people were in, after the first notion of the plague being at hand was among them, and which may be said to be from about Michaelmas 1664, but more particularly after the two men died in St Giles’s in the beginning of December; and again, after another alarm in February. For when the plague evidently spread itself, they soon began to see the folly of trusting to those unperforming creatures who had gulled them of their money; and then their fears worked another way, namely, to amazement and stupidity, not knowing what course to take or what to do either to help or relieve themselves. But they ran about from one neighbour’s house to another, and even in the streets from one door to another, with repeated cries of, ‘Lord, have mercy upon us! What shall we do?’

All of this was due to the rush the people were in after they first got the idea that the plague was coming, which can be traced back to around Michaelmas 1664, but especially after two men died in St. Giles’s at the beginning of December; and again, after another scare in February. As the plague spread obviously, they quickly realized the foolishness of trusting those unreliable individuals who had tricked them out of their money; and then their fears turned into shock and confusion, not knowing what to do or how to help themselves. But they ran from one neighbor's house to another, and even in the streets from one door to another, shouting repeatedly, "Lord, have mercy upon us! What shall we do?"

Indeed, the poor people were to be pitied in one particular thing in which they had little or no relief, and which I desire to mention with a serious awe and reflection, which perhaps every one that reads this may not relish; namely, that whereas death now began not, as we may say, to hover over every one’s head only, but to look into their houses and chambers and stare in their faces. Though there might be some stupidity and dulness of the mind (and there was so, a great deal), yet there was a great deal of just alarm sounded into the very inmost soul, if I may so say, of others. Many consciences were awakened; many hard hearts melted into tears; many a penitent confession was made of crimes long concealed. It would wound the soul of any Christian to have heard the dying groans of many a despairing creature, and none durst come near to comfort them. Many a robbery, many a murder, was then confessed aloud, and nobody surviving to record the accounts of it. People might be heard, even into the streets as we passed along, calling upon God for mercy through Jesus Christ, and saying, ‘I have been a thief, ‘I have been an adulterer’, ‘I have been a murderer’, and the like, and none durst stop to make the least inquiry into such things or to administer comfort to the poor creatures that in the anguish both of soul and body thus cried out. Some of the ministers did visit the sick at first and for a little while, but it was not to be done. It would have been present death to have gone into some houses. The very buriers of the dead, who were the hardenedest creatures in town, were sometimes beaten back and so terrified that they durst not go into houses where the whole families were swept away together, and where the circumstances were more particularly horrible, as some were; but this was, indeed, at the first heat of the distemper.

The poor people truly deserved pity for one specific thing that offered them little to no relief, and I want to mention it with seriousness and reflection, which some readers might not appreciate. Death wasn’t just looming over everyone, but it was also creeping into their homes and staring them in the face. While there were many who felt numb and dull-minded (and there definitely were), many others experienced a profound alarm that pierced deep into their souls. Lots of consciences were stirred; many hardened hearts softened and shed tears; and there were heartfelt confessions of long-hidden sins. Hearing the dying groans of desperate souls would break any Christian’s heart, yet no one dared to approach them to offer comfort. Many people openly confessed to thefts and murders, with no one left to document their stories. We could hear cries for mercy through Jesus Christ echoing into the streets as we passed by, with people admitting, “I’ve been a thief,” “I’ve been an adulterer,” “I’ve been a murderer,” and more, while no one dared to stop and inquire about their misery or provide support to those suffering in both soul and body. Some ministers initially visited the sick for a short time, but that couldn’t last. It would have meant certain death to enter certain homes. Even the gravediggers, who were typically the toughest people around, sometimes found themselves sent away in fear, refusing to enter homes where entire families had been wiped out, especially where the circumstances were particularly gruesome, though this was primarily at the height of the outbreak.

Time inured them to it all, and they ventured everywhere afterwards without hesitation, as I shall have occasion to mention at large hereafter.

Time toughened them to everything, and they moved around freely afterwards without any hesitation, as I will have the opportunity to discuss in detail later on.

I am supposing now the plague to be begun, as I have said, and that the magistrates began to take the condition of the people into their serious consideration. What they did as to the regulation of the inhabitants and of infected families, I shall speak to by itself; but as to the affair of health, it is proper to mention it here that, having seen the foolish humour of the people in running after quacks and mountebanks, wizards and fortune-tellers, which they did as above, even to madness, the Lord Mayor, a very sober and religious gentleman, appointed physicians and surgeons for relief of the poor—I mean the diseased poor and in particular ordered the College of Physicians to publish directions for cheap remedies for the poor, in all the circumstances of the distemper. This, indeed, was one of the most charitable and judicious things that could be done at that time, for this drove the people from haunting the doors of every disperser of bills, and from taking down blindly and without consideration poison for physic and death instead of life.

I'm assuming now that the plague has started, as I mentioned, and that the officials are seriously considering the people's situation. I'll talk about the management of residents and infected families separately; however, regarding health, it's important to note that after witnessing the foolish behavior of people chasing after quacks, con artists, wizards, and fortune-tellers—often to the point of madness—the Lord Mayor, a very sensible and religious man, appointed doctors and surgeons to help the poor—I mean those who were sick—and specifically ordered the College of Physicians to publish guidelines for affordable remedies for the poor, based on the various aspects of the disease. This was truly one of the most charitable and sensible actions that could have been taken at that time, as it guided people away from crowding the doors of every bill-seller and from mindlessly taking harmful substances in place of real medicine.

This direction of the physicians was done by a consultation of the whole College; and, as it was particularly calculated for the use of the poor and for cheap medicines, it was made public, so that everybody might see it, and copies were given gratis to all that desired it. But as it is public, and to be seen on all occasions, I need not give the reader of this the trouble of it.

This guidance from the physicians was decided by a meeting of the entire College; and since it was specifically intended for the benefit of the poor and for affordable medicines, it was made public so that everyone could access it, and free copies were provided to anyone who wanted one. However, since it is publicly available and can be seen at any time, I won't burden the reader with it.

I shall not be supposed to lessen the authority or capacity of the physicians when I say that the violence of the distemper, when it came to its extremity, was like the fire the next year. The fire, which consumed what the plague could not touch, defied all the application of remedies; the fire-engines were broken, the buckets thrown away, and the power of man was baffled and brought to an end. So the Plague defied all medicines; the very physicians were seized with it, with their preservatives in their mouths; and men went about prescribing to others and telling them what to do till the tokens were upon them, and they dropped down dead, destroyed by that very enemy they directed others to oppose. This was the case of several physicians, even some of them the most eminent, and of several of the most skilful surgeons. Abundance of quacks too died, who had the folly to trust to their own medicines, which they must needs be conscious to themselves were good for nothing, and who rather ought, like other sorts of thieves, to have run away, sensible of their guilt, from the justice that they could not but expect should punish them as they knew they had deserved.

I’m not trying to undermine the authority or skills of the doctors when I say that the severity of the illness, at its worst, was like the fire the following year. The fire, which destroyed what the plague couldn’t touch, resisted all attempts at remedies; the fire engines broke down, the buckets got tossed aside, and human efforts were rendered useless. Similarly, the plague resisted all medicines; even the doctors themselves fell victim to it, despite their preventative measures. People went around giving prescriptions and telling others what to do until they showed symptoms themselves and collapsed, killed by the very threat they advised others to fight against. This happened to several doctors, including some of the most respected, as well as many skilled surgeons. Many frauds died too, foolishly relying on their own ineffective remedies, which they must have known were worthless, and they should have, like other kinds of criminals, run away, aware of their guilt, from the punishment they knew was coming for them.

Not that it is any derogation from the labour or application of the physicians to say they fell in the common calamity; nor is it so intended by me; it rather is to their praise that they ventured their lives so far as even to lose them in the service of mankind. They endeavoured to do good, and to save the lives of others. But we were not to expect that the physicians could stop God’s judgements, or prevent a distemper eminently armed from heaven from executing the errand it was sent about.

It's not a criticism of the hard work or dedication of the doctors to say they were caught in the common disaster; that's not my intention. In fact, it's commendable that they risked their lives, even to the point of losing them, for the sake of others. They tried to do good and save lives. However, we shouldn't expect the doctors to be able to stop God's judgments or prevent a disease sent from heaven from fulfilling its purpose.

Doubtless, the physicians assisted many by their skill, and by their prudence and applications, to the saving of their lives and restoring their health. But it is not lessening their character or their skill, to say they could not cure those that had the tokens upon them, or those who were mortally infected before the physicians were sent for, as was frequently the case.

There’s no doubt that doctors helped many people with their expertise, careful judgment, and treatments, saving lives and restoring health. However, it doesn’t diminish their reputation or abilities to acknowledge that they couldn’t cure those who showed symptoms or those who were seriously ill before they were called, which was often the case.

It remains to mention now what public measures were taken by the magistrates for the general safety, and to prevent the spreading of the distemper, when it first broke out. I shall have frequent occasion to speak of the prudence of the magistrates, their charity, their vigilance for the poor, and for preserving good order, furnishing provisions, and the like, when the plague was increased, as it afterwards was. But I am now upon the order and regulations they published for the government of infected families.

It’s important to highlight the actions that the officials took to ensure public safety and to stop the disease from spreading when it first emerged. I will often refer to the wisdom of the officials, their generosity, and their attentiveness to the needs of the poor, as well as their efforts to maintain order and provide supplies when the plague worsened, which it did later on. But right now, I want to focus on the rules and guidelines they established for managing infected families.

I mentioned above shutting of houses up; and it is needful to say something particularly to that, for this part of the history of the plague is very melancholy, but the most grievous story must be told.

I mentioned earlier about boarding up houses; and it's important to say something specific about that, because this part of the plague's history is very sad, but the most painful story needs to be told.

About June the Lord Mayor of London and the Court of Aldermen, as I have said, began more particularly to concern themselves for the regulation of the city.

About June, the Lord Mayor of London and the Court of Aldermen, as I mentioned, started to pay more attention to the regulation of the city.

The justices of Peace for Middlesex, by direction of the Secretary of State, had begun to shut up houses in the parishes of St Giles-in-the-Fields, St Martin, St Clement Danes, &c., and it was with good success; for in several streets where the plague broke out, upon strict guarding the houses that were infected, and taking care to bury those that died immediately after they were known to be dead, the plague ceased in those streets. It was also observed that the plague decreased sooner in those parishes after they had been visited to the full than it did in the parishes of Bishopsgate, Shoreditch, Aldgate, Whitechappel, Stepney, and others; the early care taken in that manner being a great means to the putting a check to it.

The justices of the peace for Middlesex, under the direction of the Secretary of State, started closing off houses in the parishes of St. Giles-in-the-Fields, St. Martin, St. Clement Danes, etc., and it was quite effective; in several streets where the plague had erupted, strict monitoring of the infected houses and promptly burying those who died as soon as they were confirmed dead led to a halt of the plague in those areas. It was also noted that the plague diminished more quickly in those parishes after they had been fully addressed compared to the parishes of Bishopsgate, Shoreditch, Aldgate, Whitechapel, Stepney, and others; the proactive measures taken in that way significantly contributed to controlling it.

This shutting up of houses was a method first taken, as I understand, in the plague which happened in 1603, at the coming of King James the First to the crown; and the power of shutting people up in their own houses was granted by Act of Parliament, entitled, ‘An Act for the charitable Relief and Ordering of Persons infected with the Plague’; on which Act of Parliament the Lord Mayor and aldermen of the city of London founded the order they made at this time, and which took place the 1st of July 1665, when the numbers infected within the city were but few, the last bill for the ninety-two parishes being but four; and some houses having been shut up in the city, and some people being removed to the pest-house beyond Bunhill Fields, in the way to Islington,—I say, by these means, when there died near one thousand a week in the whole, the number in the city was but twenty-eight, and the city was preserved more healthy in proportion than any other place all the time of the infection.

This closing of houses was a method first used, as I understand, during the plague that occurred in 1603, when King James the First came to the throne; and the authority to isolate people in their homes was granted by an Act of Parliament, titled ‘An Act for the Charitable Relief and Ordering of Persons Infected with the Plague’; on which Act of Parliament the Lord Mayor and aldermen of the city of London based the order they issued at that time, which went into effect on July 1, 1665, when the number of infections in the city was still low, with the last report for the ninety-two parishes showing only four cases; and while some houses were closed in the city, and some people were sent to the pest-house beyond Bunhill Fields, on the way to Islington,—I say, because of these measures, when nearly a thousand people were dying each week overall, the number of deaths in the city was only twenty-eight, and the city remained healthier compared to other places throughout the duration of the infection.

These orders of my Lord Mayor’s were published, as I have said, the latter end of June, and took place from the 1st of July, and were as follows, viz.:—

These orders from my Lord Mayor were published, as I mentioned, at the end of June, and took effect from July 1st, and were as follows:—

ORDERS CONCEIVED AND PUBLISHED BY THE LORD MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF LONDON CONCERNING THE INFECTION OF THE PLAGUE, 1665.

ORDERS CREATED AND RELEASED BY THE LORD MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF LONDON REGARDING THE PLAGUE INFECTION, 1665.

‘WHEREAS in the reign of our late Sovereign King James, of happy memory, an Act was made for the charitable relief and ordering of persons infected with the plague, whereby authority was given to justices of the peace, mayors, bailiffs, and other head-officers to appoint within their several limits examiners, searchers, watchmen, keepers, and buriers for the persons and places infected, and to minister unto them oaths for the performance of their offices. And the same statute did also authorise the giving of other directions, as unto them for the present necessity should seem good in their directions. It is now, upon special consideration, thought very expedient for preventing and avoiding of infection of sickness (if it shall so please Almighty God) that these officers following be appointed, and these orders hereafter duly observed.

‘WHEREAS during the reign of our late Sovereign King James, of happy memory, an Act was established for the charitable support and management of people affected by the plague, granting authority to justices of the peace, mayors, bailiffs, and other chief officers to appoint examiners, searchers, watchmen, keepers, and buriers within their respective areas for dealing with the infected individuals and locations, and to administer oaths for the execution of their duties. The same statute also allowed for additional instructions to be given as deemed necessary by them in light of the current needs. It is now, after careful consideration, deemed very necessary to prevent and avoid the spread of sickness (if it is the will of Almighty God) that the following officers be appointed, and that these orders be duly followed going forward.

Examiners to be appointed in every Parish.

Examiners will be assigned to each Parish.

‘First, it is thought requisite, and so ordered, that in every parish there be one, two, or more persons of good sort and credit chosen and appointed by the alderman, his deputy, and common council of every ward, by the name of examiners, to continue in that office the space of two months at least. And if any fit person so appointed shall refuse to undertake the same, the said parties so refusing to be committed to prison until they shall conform themselves accordingly.

‘First, it is considered necessary, and therefore required, that in every parish there should be one, two, or more respected and reputable individuals chosen and appointed by the alderman, his deputy, and the common council of each ward, referred to as examiners, to hold that position for at least two months. If any suitable person appointed refuses to take on the role, those individuals who refuse will be imprisoned until they comply.

The Examiner’s Office.

The Examiner's Office.

‘That these examiners be sworn by the aldermen to inquire and learn from time to time what houses in every parish be visited, and what persons be sick, and of what diseases, as near as they can inform themselves; and upon doubt in that case, to command restraint of access until it appear what the disease shall prove. And if they find any person sick of the infection, to give order to the constable that the house be shut up; and if the constable shall be found remiss or negligent, to give present notice thereof to the alderman of the ward.

‘The examiners should be sworn in by the aldermen to regularly check which houses in each parish are being visited, who is sick, and what their illnesses are, as much as they can find out. If there’s any doubt in a situation, they should restrict access until it’s clear what the illness is. If they discover someone sick with an infectious disease, they must instruct the constable to confine the house; if the constable is found to be negligent or careless, they should immediately inform the alderman of the ward.’

Watchmen.

Watchmen.

‘That to every infected house there be appointed two watchmen, one for every day, and the other for the night; and that these watchmen have a special care that no person go in or out of such infected houses whereof they have the charge, upon pain of severe punishment. And the said watchmen to do such further offices as the sick house shall need and require: and if the watchman be sent upon any business, to lock up the house and take the key with him; and the watchman by day to attend until ten of the clock at night, and the watchman by night until six in the morning.

‘Each infected house will have two watchmen appointed, one for the day and the other for the night. These watchmen must ensure that no one enters or leaves the infected houses they oversee, under the threat of strict punishment. They are also responsible for any additional tasks the sick house may need. If a watchman needs to leave for any reason, they must lock up the house and take the key with them. The day watchman will work until 10 PM, and the night watchman will be on duty until 6 AM.’

Searchers.

Searchers.

‘That there be a special care to appoint women searchers in every parish, such as are of honest reputation, and of the best sort as can be got in this kind; and these to be sworn to make due search and true report to the utmost of their knowledge whether the persons whose bodies they are appointed to search do die of the infection, or of what other diseases, as near as they can. And that the physicians who shall be appointed for cure and prevention of the infection do call before them the said searchers who are, or shall be, appointed for the several parishes under their respective cares, to the end they may consider whether they are fitly qualified for that employment, and charge them from time to time as they shall see cause, if they appear defective in their duties.

That there should be special care to appoint women searchers in every parish, who are of good reputation and the best quality available; these women are to be sworn to conduct thorough searches and report accurately to the best of their knowledge whether the individuals they are appointed to examine died from the infection or other diseases, as closely as possible. Additionally, the physicians assigned to treat and prevent the infection are to meet with the searchers designated for their respective parishes, so they can assess whether these searchers are properly qualified for their role and instruct them as needed if they are found lacking in their duties.

‘That no searcher during this time of visitation be permitted to use any public work or employment, or keep any shop or stall, or be employed as a laundress, or in any other common employment whatsoever.

‘That no searcher during this time of visitation be allowed to use any public work or employment, or run any shop or stall, or be hired as a laundress, or in any other ordinary job whatsoever.

Chirurgeons.

Surgeons.

‘For better assistance of the searchers, forasmuch as there hath been heretofore great abuse in misreporting the disease, to the further spreading of the infection, it is therefore ordered that there be chosen and appointed able and discreet chirurgeons, besides those that do already belong to the pest-house, amongst whom the city and Liberties to be quartered as the places lie most apt and convenient; and every of these to have one quarter for his limit; and the said chirurgeons in every of their limits to join with the searchers for the view of the body, to the end there may be a true report made of the disease.

For better assistance of the searchers, since there has been significant abuse in misreporting the disease, which has contributed to the further spread of the infection, it is ordered that able and sensible surgeons, in addition to those already associated with the pest-house, be selected and appointed. The city and its surrounding areas will be divided into quarters that are most suitable and convenient; each surgeon will be assigned one quarter as their area of responsibility. These surgeons will work with the searchers in their assigned areas to verify the condition of the bodies, ensuring that accurate reports of the disease are made.

‘And further, that the said chirurgeons shall visit and search such-like persons as shall either send for them or be named and directed unto them by the examiners of every parish, and inform themselves of the disease of the said parties.

‘And further, that the said surgeons shall visit and examine those individuals who either request their services or are referred to them by the examiners of each parish, and learn about the illnesses of those individuals.’

‘And forasmuch as the said chirurgeons are to be sequestered from all other cures, and kept only to this disease of the infection, it is ordered that every of the said chirurgeons shall have twelve-pence a body searched by them, to be paid out of the goods of the party searched, if he be able, or otherwise by the parish.

‘Since the aforementioned surgeons are to be separated from all other treatments and focused solely on this infectious disease, it is mandated that each of the surgeons will receive twelve pence for every person they examine, to be paid from the belongings of the person examined, if they can afford it, or otherwise by the parish.

Nurse-keepers.

Nurse caregivers.

‘If any nurse-keeper shall remove herself out of any infected house before twenty-eight days after the decease of any person dying of the infection, the house to which the said nurse-keeper doth so remove herself shall be shut up until the said twenty-eight days be expired.’

‘If any nurse or caretaker leaves an infected house before twenty-eight days have passed since the death of a person who died from the infection, the house to which the nurse or caretaker moves will be closed until the twenty-eight days are up.’


ORDERS CONCERNING INFECTED HOUSES AND PERSONS SICK OF THE PLAGUE.

ORDERS ABOUT INFECTED HOUSES AND PEOPLE SICK WITH THE PLAGUE.

Notice to be given of the Sickness.

Notice to be given of the illness.

‘The master of every house, as soon as any one in his house complaineth, either of blotch or purple, or swelling in any part of his body, or falleth otherwise dangerously sick, without apparent cause of some other disease, shall give knowledge thereof to the examiner of health within two hours after the said sign shall appear.

‘The head of the household, whenever anyone in their home complains of a rash, purple spots, swelling in any part of their body, or falls seriously ill without a clear cause from another illness, must report this to the health inspector within two hours of the symptoms appearing.

Sequestration of the Sick.

Isolation of the Sick.

‘As soon as any man shall be found by this examiner, chirurgeon, or searcher to be sick of the plague, he shall the same night be sequestered in the same house; and in case he be so sequestered, then though he afterwards die not, the house wherein he sickened should be shut up for a month, after the use of the due preservatives taken by the rest.

‘As soon as anyone is found by this examiner, surgeon, or searcher to have the plague, they should be isolated in the same house that night; and if they are isolated, then even if they do not die later, the house where they became sick should be closed off for a month, after the proper precautions are taken by the others.’

Airing the Stuff.

Sharing the Stuff.

‘For sequestration of the goods and stuff of the infection, their bedding and apparel and hangings of chambers must be well aired with fire and such perfumes as are requisite within the infected house before they be taken again to use. This to be done by the appointment of an examiner.

'To isolate the belongings and items from the infection, their bedding, clothing, and room hangings must be thoroughly aired with fire and the necessary fragrances inside the infected house before they can be used again. This should be done under the authority of an examiner.'

Shutting up of the House.

Closing of the House.

‘If any person shall have visited any man known to be infected of the plague, or entered willingly into any known infected house, being not allowed, the house wherein he inhabiteth shall be shut up for certain days by the examiner’s direction.

‘If anyone visits a person known to have the plague, or willingly enters a house known to be infected without permission, the house they live in will be sealed for a specific number of days as directed by the examiner.’

None to be removed out of infected Houses, but, &C.

None to be removed from infected houses, but, &C.

‘Item, that none be removed out of the house where he falleth sick of the infection into any other house in the city (except it be to the pest-house or a tent, or unto some such house which the owner of the said visited house holdeth in his own hands and occupieth by his own servants); and so as security be given to the parish whither such remove is made, that the attendance and charge about the said visited persons shall be observed and charged in all the particularities before expressed, without any cost of that parish to which any such remove shall happen to be made, and this remove to be done by night. And it shall be lawful to any person that hath two houses to remove either his sound or his infected people to his spare house at his choice, so as, if he send away first his sound, he not after send thither his sick, nor again unto the sick the sound; and that the same which he sendeth be for one week at the least shut up and secluded from company, for fear of some infection at the first not appearing.

‘Item, no one should be moved out of the house where they fall sick from the infection to any other house in the city (unless it’s to the pest-house, a tent, or any other house that the owner of the visited house manages and occupies with their own servants); and as long as security is provided to the parish where the move is made, that the care and expenses for those visited persons will be followed and accounted for in all the details mentioned before, without any cost to the parish to which the removal occurs, and this removal should happen at night. It shall be permitted for anyone who has two houses to move either their healthy or infected people to their spare house of their choice, provided that if they first send away their healthy, they do not then send their sick there afterward, nor send the healthy to the sick; and whatever they send must be kept shut up and isolated from others for at least one week, due to the risk of some infection that may not be apparent at first.’

Burial of the Dead.

Burial of the Dead.

‘That the burial of the dead by this visitation be at most convenient hours, always either before sun-rising or after sun-setting, with the privity of the churchwardens or constable, and not otherwise; and that no neighbours nor friends be suffered to accompany the corpse to church, or to enter the house visited, upon pain of having his house shut up or be imprisoned.

‘Burials due to this visitation should take place at the most convenient times, either before sunrise or after sunset, with the agreement of the churchwardens or constable, and not otherwise; and that no neighbors or friends are allowed to accompany the body to church, or enter the visited house, under the threat of having their house shut up or being imprisoned.

‘And that no corpse dying of infection shall be buried, or remain in any church in time of common prayer, sermon, or lecture. And that no children be suffered at time of burial of any corpse in any church, churchyard, or burying-place to come near the corpse, coffin, or grave. And that all the graves shall be at least six feet deep.

‘And that no body that has died of an infection shall be buried, or stay in any church during common prayer, sermons, or lectures. And that no children are allowed near the body, coffin, or grave at the time of any burial in any church, churchyard, or burial place. And that all graves must be at least six feet deep.

‘And further, all public assemblies at other burials are to be foreborne during the continuance of this visitation.

‘And furthermore, all public gatherings at other funerals are to be avoided during this period of visitation.

No infected Stuff to be uttered.

No infected stuff to be spoken.

‘That no clothes, stuff, bedding, or garments be suffered to be carried or conveyed out of any infected houses, and that the criers and carriers abroad of bedding or old apparel to be sold or pawned be utterly prohibited and restrained, and no brokers of bedding or old apparel be permitted to make any outward show, or hang forth on their stalls, shop-boards, or windows, towards any street, lane, common way, or passage, any old bedding or apparel to be sold, upon pain of imprisonment. And if any broker or other person shall buy any bedding, apparel, or other stuff out of any infected house within two months after the infection hath been there, his house shall be shut up as infected, and so shall continue shut up twenty days at the least.

‘No clothes, bedding, or items should be taken out of any infected houses, and it is strictly prohibited for anyone to sell or pawn old bedding or clothing. No brokers of bedding or old apparel are allowed to display them outside their stalls, shops, or windows in any street, lane, or public area, under the threat of imprisonment. If any broker or individual buys any bedding, clothing, or other items from an infected house within two months after the infection has occurred there, their house will be closed as infected and will remain closed for at least twenty days.’

No Person to be conveyed out of any infected House.

No one is allowed to be taken out of any infected house.

‘If any person visited do fortune, by negligent looking unto, or by any other means, to come or be conveyed from a place infected to any other place, the parish from whence such party hath come or been conveyed, upon notice thereof given, shall at their charge cause the said party so visited and escaped to be carried and brought back again by night, and the parties in this case offending to be punished at the direction of the alderman of the ward, and the house of the receiver of such visited person to be shut up for twenty days.

‘If anyone seeks their fortune by carelessly looking or by any other means, and travels from an infected place to another location, the parish from which that person came, upon notice, must arrange for that person to be taken back at their own expense, by night. Those who are at fault in this situation will face punishment as determined by the alderman of the ward, and the house of the person who received the infected individual will be closed for twenty days.’

Every visited House to be marked.

Every visited house should be marked.

‘That every house visited be marked with a red cross of a foot long in the middle of the door, evident to be seen, and with these usual printed words, that is to say, “Lord, have mercy upon us,” to be set close over the same cross, there to continue until lawful opening of the same house.

‘That every house visited be marked with a red cross of a foot long in the middle of the door, easy to see, and with the usual printed words, that is to say, “Lord, have mercy upon us,” placed directly above the cross, remaining there until the house is officially opened again.’

Every visited House to be watched.

Every visited house is to be observed.

‘That the constables see every house shut up, and to be attended with watchmen, which may keep them in, and minister necessaries unto them at their own charges, if they be able, or at the common charge, if they are unable; the shutting up to be for the space of four weeks after all be whole.

‘The constables should ensure that every house is shut up and attended by watchmen, who can keep people inside and provide necessities at their own expense if they can, or at the community's expense if they can't; the lockdown should last for four weeks until everyone is healthy again.

‘That precise order to be taken that the searchers, chirurgeons, keepers, and buriers are not to pass the streets without holding a red rod or wand of three feet in length in their hands, open and evident to be seen, and are not to go into any other house than into their own, or into that whereunto they are directed or sent for; but to forbear and abstain from company, especially when they have been lately used in any such business or attendance.

‘That specific order must be followed: searchers, surgeons, keepers, and graves diggers are not allowed to walk the streets without carrying a red rod or wand at least three feet long, clearly visible in their hands. They should not enter any house other than their own, or the one they are directed to or sent for; instead, they should avoid socializing, especially if they have recently been involved in such duties or attended to such matters.

Inmates.

Prisoners.

‘That where several inmates are in one and the same house, and any person in that house happens to be infected, no other person or family of such house shall be suffered to remove him or themselves without a certificate from the examiners of health of that parish; or in default thereof, the house whither he or they so remove shall be shut up as in case of visitation.

‘If there are multiple inmates in one house, and anyone in that house is infected, no other person or family from that house can leave without a certificate from the health examiners of that parish; otherwise, the house they try to leave to will be closed off as it would during an outbreak.

Hackney-Coaches.

Rideshare vehicles.

‘That care be taken of hackney-coachmen, that they may not (as some of them have been observed to do after carrying of infected persons to the pest-house and other places) be admitted to common use till their coaches be well aired, and have stood unemployed by the space of five or six days after such service.’

‘Care should be taken of cab drivers, so they aren’t allowed to operate until their cabs have been aired out and left unused for five or six days after transporting infected people to the pest house and other locations, which some of them have been seen doing.’


ORDERS FOR CLEANSING AND KEEPING OF THE STREETS SWEPT.

ORDERS FOR CLEANING AND MAINTAINING THE STREETS.

The Streets to be kept Clean.

Keep the streets clean.

‘First, it is thought necessary, and so ordered, that every householder do cause the street to be daily prepared before his door, and so to keep it clean swept all the week long.

‘First, it is deemed necessary, and therefore required, that every householder ensure the street in front of their home is cleaned every day and kept tidy throughout the week.

That Rakers take it from out the Houses.

That Rakers take it from the houses.

‘That the sweeping and filth of houses be daily carried away by the rakers, and that the raker shall give notice of his coming by the blowing of a horn, as hitherto hath been done.

‘That the trash and dirt from houses be taken away daily by the garbage collectors, and that the collector shall announce his arrival by blowing a horn, just as has been done before.’

Laystalls to be made far off from the City.

Laystalls are to be located far from the city.

‘That the laystalls be removed as far as may be out of the city and common passages, and that no nightman or other be suffered to empty a vault into any garden near about the city.

‘That the dumps be moved as far out of the city and common pathways as possible, and that no one, including nightmen, is allowed to empty a vault into any garden close to the city.

Care to be had of unwholesome Fish or Flesh, and of musty Corn.

Be careful of rotten fish or meat, and of stale grain.

‘That special care be taken that no stinking fish, or unwholesome flesh, or musty corn, or other corrupt fruits of what sort soever, be suffered to be sold about the city, or any part of the same.

‘That special care be taken that no foul fish, or spoiled meat, or old corn, or any other rotten food of any kind be allowed to be sold around the city, or anywhere within it.

‘That the brewers and tippling-houses be looked into for musty and unwholesome casks.

‘That the breweries and bars be checked for old and unhealthy barrels.

‘That no hogs, dogs, or cats, or tame pigeons, or ponies, be suffered to be kept within any part of the city, or any swine to be or stray in the streets or lanes, but that such swine be impounded by the beadle or any other officer, and the owner punished according to Act of Common Council, and that the dogs be killed by the dog-killers appointed for that purpose.’

‘No pigs, dogs, cats, tame pigeons, or ponies are allowed to be kept anywhere in the city, and no pigs should be found roaming in the streets or alleys. If they are, the beadle or another officer will impound them, and the owner will be punished according to the Act of Common Council. Dogs will be killed by the appointed dog-killers.’


ORDERS CONCERNING LOOSE PERSONS AND IDLE ASSEMBLIES.

ORDERS ABOUT LOITERING INDIVIDUALS AND UNPRODUCTIVE GATHERINGS.

Beggars.

Homeless people.

‘Forasmuch as nothing is more complained of than the multitude of rogues and wandering beggars that swarm in every place about the city, being a great cause of the spreading of the infection, and will not be avoided, notwithstanding any orders that have been given to the contrary: It is therefore now ordered, that such constables, and others whom this matter may any way concern, take special care that no wandering beggars be suffered in the streets of this city in any fashion or manner whatsoever, upon the penalty provided by the law, to be duly and severely executed upon them.

Because nothing is complained about more than the large number of pickpockets and wandering beggars crowding the city, which significantly contributes to the spread of infection and cannot be avoided despite any orders to the contrary: It is now ordered that constables and others involved in this matter must ensure that no wandering beggars are allowed in the streets of this city in any way or form, under the penalties set by the law, which will be enforced strictly.

Plays.

Plays.

‘That all plays, bear-baitings, games, singing of ballads, buckler-play, or such-like causes of assemblies of people be utterly prohibited, and the parties offending severely punished by every alderman in his ward.

‘That all plays, bear-baiting, games, singing ballads, swordplay, or similar activities that bring people together are completely banned, and those who break this rule will be harshly punished by each alderman in their ward.

Feasting prohibited.

No feasting allowed.

‘That all public feasting, and particularly by the companies of this city, and dinners at taverns, ale-houses, and other places of common entertainment, be forborne till further order and allowance; and that the money thereby spared be preserved and employed for the benefit and relief of the poor visited with the infection.

‘That all public feasting, especially by the groups in this city, and dinners at taverns, ale-houses, and other places of public gathering, should be stopped until further notice; and that the money saved in doing so be set aside and used to help the poor affected by the infection.

Tippling-houses.

Bars.

‘That disorderly tippling in taverns, ale-houses, coffee-houses, and cellars be severely looked unto, as the common sin of this time and greatest occasion of dispersing the plague. And that no company or person be suffered to remain or come into any tavern, ale-house, or coffee-house to drink after nine of the clock in the evening, according to the ancient law and custom of this city, upon the penalties ordained in that behalf.

‘That unruly drinking in bars, pubs, coffee shops, and basements be strictly monitored, as it is a widespread issue of this time and a major cause of spreading the plague. No group or individual should be allowed to stay or enter any bar, pub, or coffee shop to drink after nine o’clock in the evening, in accordance with the long-standing laws and customs of this city, under the penalties established for that purpose.

‘And for the better execution of these orders, and such other rules and directions as, upon further consideration, shall be found needful: It is ordered and enjoined that the aldermen, deputies, and common councilmen shall meet together weekly, once, twice, thrice or oftener (as cause shall require), at some one general place accustomed in their respective wards (being clear from infection of the plague), to consult how the said orders may be duly put in execution; not intending that any dwelling in or near places infected shall come to the said meeting while their coming may be doubtful. And the said aldermen, and deputies, and common councilmen in their several wards may put in execution any other good orders that by them at their said meetings shall be conceived and devised for preservation of his Majesty’s subjects from the infection.

‘To better carry out these orders and any other rules and directions that may be deemed necessary after further consideration: It is ordered and required that the aldermen, deputies, and common council members will meet together weekly—once, twice, three times, or more often (as needed)—at a designated public place in their respective wards (as long as it is free from plague infection), to discuss how to effectively implement these orders; those living in or near infected areas should not attend these meetings while there is any doubt about their safety. The aldermen, deputies, and common council members in their respective wards may also implement any other beneficial orders that they create and agree upon at these meetings to protect His Majesty’s subjects from infection.

‘SIR JOHN LAWRENCE, Lord Mayor.
SIR GEORGE WATERMAN
SIR CHARLES DOE, Sheriffs.’

‘SIR JOHN LAWRENCE, Lord Mayor.
SIR GEORGE WATERMAN
SIR CHARLES DOE, Sheriffs.’

I need not say that these orders extended only to such places as were within the Lord Mayor’s jurisdiction, so it is requisite to observe that the justices of Peace within those parishes and places as were called the Hamlets and out-parts took the same method. As I remember, the orders for shutting up of houses did not take Place so soon on our side, because, as I said before, the plague did not reach to these eastern parts of the town at least, nor begin to be very violent, till the beginning of August. For example, the whole bill from the 11th to the 18th of July was 1761, yet there died but 71 of the plague in all those parishes we call the Tower Hamlets, and they were as follows:—

I shouldn't have to mention that these orders only applied to areas within the Lord Mayor’s control, so it’s important to note that the local justices of Peace in the parishes and areas known as the Hamlets and outskirts followed the same approach. As I recall, the orders to close down homes weren't enforced as quickly in our area because, as I previously mentioned, the plague hadn't reached these eastern parts of the town yet, nor did it start becoming really severe until early August. For instance, the total deaths from July 11th to July 18th was 1761, but only 71 people died from the plague in all the parishes we refer to as the Tower Hamlets, and they were as follows:—

     -                           The next week   And to the 1st
     -                             was thus:     of Aug. thus:
     Aldgate               14          34               65
     Stepney               33          58               76
     Whitechappel          21          48               79
     St Katherine, Tower    2           4                4
     Trinity, Minories      1           1                4
     -                    —-         —-              —-
     -                     71         145              228
     -                           The next week   And to the 1st
     -                             of Aug. thus:
     Aldgate               14          34               65
     Stepney               33          58               76
     Whitechapel          21          48               79
     St Katherine, Tower    2           4                4
     Trinity, Minories      1           1                4
     -                    —-         —-              —-
     -                     71         145              228

It was indeed coming on amain, for the burials that same week were in the next adjoining parishes thus:—

It was really picking up, as the burials that week were in the neighboring parishes like this:—

     -                                The next week
     -                                prodigiously    To the 1st of
     -                                increased, as:   Aug. thus:
     St Leonard’s, Shoreditch      64       84          110
     St Botolph’s, Bishopsgate     65      105          116
     St Giles’s, Cripplegate      213      421          554
     -                            —-      —-          —-
     -                            342      610          780
     -                                The next week
     -                                significantly   To the 1st of
     -                                Aug. thus:
     St Leonard’s, Shoreditch      64       84          110
     St Botolph’s, Bishopsgate     65      105          116
     St Giles’s, Cripplegate      213      421          554
     -                            —-      —-          —-
     -                            342      610          780

This shutting up of houses was at first counted a very cruel and unchristian method, and the poor people so confined made bitter lamentations. Complaints of the severity of it were also daily brought to my Lord Mayor, of houses causelessly (and some maliciously) shut up. I cannot say; but upon inquiry many that complained so loudly were found in a condition to be continued; and others again, inspection being made upon the sick person, and the sickness not appearing infectious, or if uncertain, yet on his being content to be carried to the pest-house, were released.

This closing of houses was initially seen as a very harsh and un-Christian approach, and the poor people trapped inside expressed deep sorrow. Complaints about its severity were also regularly brought to my Lord Mayor, about houses being shut up without cause (and some out of spite). I can't say for sure; however, upon investigation, many who complained so loudly were found to be still at risk, while others, after an inspection of the sick person revealed that the illness didn't seem infectious, or if it was uncertain, were allowed to leave when they agreed to be taken to the pest-house.

It is true that the locking up the doors of people’s houses, and setting a watchman there night and day to prevent their stirring out or any coming to them, when perhaps the sound people in the family might have escaped if they had been removed from the sick, looked very hard and cruel; and many people perished in these miserable confinements which, ’tis reasonable to believe, would not have been distempered if they had had liberty, though the plague was in the house; at which the people were very clamorous and uneasy at first, and several violences were committed and injuries offered to the men who were set to watch the houses so shut up; also several people broke out by force in many places, as I shall observe by-and-by. But it was a public good that justified the private mischief, and there was no obtaining the least mitigation by any application to magistrates or government at that time, at least not that I heard of. This put the people upon all manner of stratagem in order, if possible, to get out; and it would fill a little volume to set down the arts used by the people of such houses to shut the eyes of the watchmen who were employed, to deceive them, and to escape or break out from them, in which frequent scuffles and some mischief happened; of which by itself.

It's true that locking the doors of people's homes and having a guard there day and night to prevent anyone from leaving or entering seemed very harsh and cruel. Many healthy family members could have escaped if they hadn't been forced to stay with the sick, which led to a lot of suffering. It’s reasonable to think that people might not have gotten sick themselves if they had been allowed some liberty, even with the plague in the house. People were understandably frustrated and upset at first, and there were several instances of violence against the guards watching these quarantined houses. Many individuals also managed to break out forcefully in various places, as I’ll detail later. However, the public good justified these private hardships, and no relief could be obtained from magistrates or the government at that time, at least not that I know of. This situation pushed people to come up with all sorts of tricks to try to escape. There are enough stories about the tactics used by people in those houses to blind the guards, trick them, and flee that it could fill a small book, which often led to scuffles and some chaos.

As I went along Houndsditch one morning about eight o’clock there was a great noise. It is true, indeed, there was not much crowd, because people were not very free to gather together, or to stay long together when they were there; nor did I stay long there. But the outcry was loud enough to prompt my curiosity, and I called to one that looked out of a window, and asked what was the matter.

As I walked along Houndsditch one morning around eight o’clock, there was a lot of noise. It’s true that there wasn’t a big crowd because people weren’t really free to gather or hang around for long, and I didn’t stay there long either. But the commotion was loud enough to spark my curiosity, so I called to someone looking out of a window and asked what was going on.

A watchman, it seems, had been employed to keep his post at the door of a house which was infected, or said to be infected, and was shut up. He had been there all night for two nights together, as he told his story, and the day-watchman had been there one day, and was now come to relieve him. All this while no noise had been heard in the house, no light had been seen; they called for nothing, sent him of no errands, which used to be the chief business of the watchmen; neither had they given him any disturbance, as he said, from the Monday afternoon, when he heard great crying and screaming in the house, which, as he supposed, was occasioned by some of the family dying just at that time. It seems, the night before, the dead-cart, as it was called, had been stopped there, and a servant-maid had been brought down to the door dead, and the buriers or bearers, as they were called, put her into the cart, wrapt only in a green rug, and carried her away.

A watchman had been hired to stand guard at the door of a house that was infected, or supposedly infected, and was shut up. He had been there all night for two nights in a row, as he recounted, and the day-watchman had been there for one day and had now come to take over. During all this time, no noise had come from the house, no light had been seen; they didn't call for anything or send him on any errands, which was usually the main job of the watchmen; nor had they disturbed him, as he said, since Monday afternoon when he heard loud crying and screaming from the house, which he assumed was due to a family member dying at that moment. It seems that the night before, the dead-cart had stopped there, and a maid had been taken down to the door dead. The bearers, as they were called, placed her in the cart, wrapped only in a green rug, and carried her away.

The watchman had knocked at the door, it seems, when he heard that noise and crying, as above, and nobody answered a great while; but at last one looked out and said with an angry, quick tone, and yet a kind of crying voice, or a voice of one that was crying, ‘What d’ye want, that ye make such a knocking?’ He answered, ‘I am the watchman! How do you do? What is the matter?’ The person answered, ‘What is that to you? Stop the dead-cart.’ This, it seems, was about one o’clock. Soon after, as the fellow said, he stopped the dead-cart, and then knocked again, but nobody answered. He continued knocking, and the bellman called out several times, ‘Bring out your dead’; but nobody answered, till the man that drove the cart, being called to other houses, would stay no longer, and drove away.

The watchman had knocked on the door, it seems, when he heard the noise and crying, as mentioned, and nobody answered for a long time; but finally, someone looked out and said in an angry, quick tone, yet sounding like someone who was crying, “What do you want, making such a racket?” He replied, “I’m the watchman! How’s it going? What’s the issue?” The person responded, “What’s that to you? Stop the dead-cart.” This was around one o’clock. Soon after, as the man said, he stopped the dead-cart and knocked again, but nobody answered. He kept knocking, and the bellman shouted several times, “Bring out your dead”; but nobody replied until the man driving the cart, being called to other houses, couldn’t stay any longer and drove away.

The watchman knew not what to make of all this, so he let them alone till the morning-man or day-watchman, as they called him, came to relieve him. Giving him an account of the particulars, they knocked at the door a great while, but nobody answered; and they observed that the window or casement at which the person had looked out who had answered before continued open, being up two pair of stairs.

The watchman didn't know what to think of all this, so he left them until the morning guy, or day-watchman as they called him, came to take over. He told him what had happened, and they knocked on the door for a long time, but no one answered. They noticed that the window, or the casement, where the person had looked out before was still open, situated two flights up.

Upon this the two men, to satisfy their curiosity, got a long ladder, and one of them went up to the window and looked into the room, where he saw a woman lying dead upon the floor in a dismal manner, having no clothes on her but her shift. But though he called aloud, and putting in his long staff, knocked hard on the floor, yet nobody stirred or answered; neither could he hear any noise in the house.

Upon this, the two men, eager to satisfy their curiosity, grabbed a long ladder. One of them climbed up to the window and looked inside the room, where he saw a woman lying dead on the floor in a tragic way, wearing nothing but her shift. Although he called out loudly and knocked hard on the floor with his long stick, no one stirred or responded; he couldn't hear any sounds coming from the house either.

He came down again upon this, and acquainted his fellow, who went up also; and finding it just so, they resolved to acquaint either the Lord Mayor or some other magistrate of it, but did not offer to go in at the window. The magistrate, it seems, upon the information of the two men, ordered the house to be broke open, a constable and other persons being appointed to be present, that nothing might be plundered; and accordingly it was so done, when nobody was found in the house but that young woman, who having been infected and past recovery, the rest had left her to die by herself, and were every one gone, having found some way to delude the watchman, and to get open the door, or get out at some back-door, or over the tops of the houses, so that he knew nothing of it; and as to those cries and shrieks which he heard, it was supposed they were the passionate cries of the family at the bitter parting, which, to be sure, it was to them all, this being the sister to the mistress of the family. The man of the house, his wife, several children, and servants, being all gone and fled, whether sick or sound, that I could never learn; nor, indeed, did I make much inquiry after it.

He went back down and told his friend, who also went up; and finding it exactly as he described, they decided to inform either the Lord Mayor or another official about it, but they didn’t try to enter through the window. The official, it seems, acted on the information from the two men and ordered the house to be broken into, appointing a constable and others to be present so that nothing would get stolen; and that’s exactly what happened. They found no one in the house except for a young woman, who had been infected and was beyond recovery. The others had left her to die alone and had all gone away, having figured out how to trick the watchman and get the door open, or escape through a back door, or climb over the roofs, so he had no idea about it. As for the cries and screams he heard, it was believed they were the desperate cries of the family during a painful farewell, which it surely was for all of them, as she was the sister of the head of the household. The man of the house, his wife, several children, and servants had all fled, whether they were sick or well, I could never find out; in fact, I didn’t really bother to ask much about it.

Many such escapes were made out of infected houses, as particularly when the watchman was sent of some errand; for it was his business to go of any errand that the family sent him of; that is to say, for necessaries, such as food and physic; to fetch physicians, if they would come, or surgeons, or nurses, or to order the dead-cart, and the like; but with this condition, too, that when he went he was to lock up the outer door of the house and take the key away with him, To evade this, and cheat the watchmen, people got two or three keys made to their locks, or they found ways to unscrew the locks such as were screwed on, and so take off the lock, being in the inside of the house, and while they sent away the watchman to the market, to the bakehouse, or for one trifle or another, open the door and go out as often as they pleased. But this being found out, the officers afterwards had orders to padlock up the doors on the outside, and place bolts on them as they thought fit.

Many people managed to escape from infected houses, especially when the watchman was sent on an errand. It was his job to run errands for the family, like getting necessities such as food and medicine; fetching doctors, surgeons, or nurses; or calling for the dead-cart, and so on. However, there was a condition: when he left, he had to lock the outer door and take the key with him. To get around this and trick the watchmen, some people had two or three keys made for their locks, or they found ways to unscrew the locks that were fixed in place, allowing them to remove the lock from inside the house. While they sent the watchman off to the market, the bakehouse, or for some minor errand, they could open the door and leave whenever they wanted. But once this was discovered, the officials were instructed to padlock the doors from the outside and add bolts as they saw fit.

At another house, as I was informed, in the street next within Aldgate, a whole family was shut up and locked in because the maid-servant was taken sick. The master of the house had complained by his friends to the next alderman and to the Lord Mayor, and had consented to have the maid carried to the pest-house, but was refused; so the door was marked with a red cross, a padlock on the outside, as above, and a watchman set to keep the door, according to public order.

At another house, I heard, in the street just inside Aldgate, a whole family was locked in because the maid got sick. The head of the household had told his friends to complain to the nearest alderman and the Lord Mayor, and agreed to have the maid taken to the pest house, but was turned down. So, the door was marked with a red cross, a padlock put on the outside, and a watchman assigned to keep an eye on the door, as per public regulations.

After the master of the house found there was no remedy, but that he, his wife, and his children were to be locked up with this poor distempered servant, he called to the watchman, and told him he must go then and fetch a nurse for them to attend this poor girl, for that it would be certain death to them all to oblige them to nurse her; and told him plainly that if he would not do this, the maid must perish either of the distemper or be starved for want of food, for he was resolved none of his family should go near her; and she lay in the garret four storey high, where she could not cry out, or call to anybody for help.

After the head of the household realized there was no other option but for him, his wife, and their kids to be confined with this sick servant, he called to the watchman and told him he needed to go get a nurse to care for the poor girl. He explained that it would mean certain death for all of them to force them to take care of her. He made it clear that if the watchman didn’t do this, the maid would either die from her illness or starve because of a lack of food, as he was determined none of his family would be near her. She was in the attic on the fourth floor, where she couldn’t cry out or call anyone for help.

The watchman consented to that, and went and fetched a nurse, as he was appointed, and brought her to them the same evening. During this interval the master of the house took his opportunity to break a large hole through his shop into a bulk or stall, where formerly a cobbler had sat, before or under his shop-window; but the tenant, as may be supposed at such a dismal time as that, was dead or removed, and so he had the key in his own keeping. Having made his way into this stall, which he could not have done if the man had been at the door, the noise he was obliged to make being such as would have alarmed the watchman; I say, having made his way into this stall, he sat still till the watchman returned with the nurse, and all the next day also. But the night following, having contrived to send the watchman of another trifling errand, which, as I take it, was to an apothecary’s for a plaister for the maid, which he was to stay for the making up, or some other such errand that might secure his staying some time; in that time he conveyed himself and all his family out of the house, and left the nurse and the watchman to bury the poor wench—that is, throw her into the cart—and take care of the house.

The watchman agreed to that and went to get a nurse, as he was supposed to do, and brought her to them that same evening. During this time, the master of the house seized the chance to break a large hole through his shop into a stall where a cobbler used to work, right in front of his shop window; but the tenant, as you might expect at such a sad time, was either dead or gone, so he had the key with him. Once he got into this stall, which he wouldn’t have been able to do if the man had been at the door—since the noise he had to make would have alerted the watchman—he remained quiet until the watchman returned with the nurse, and stayed there all the next day, too. However, the following night, having managed to send the watchman on another minor errand, which I believe was to get a plaster for the maid at a chemist’s, where he had to wait for it to be prepared, or some other errand that would keep him occupied for a while; during that time, he quietly slipped himself and his entire family out of the house and left the nurse and the watchman to take care of the poor girl—that is, to toss her into the cart—and look after the house.

I could give a great many such stories as these, diverting enough, which in the long course of that dismal year I met with—that is, heard of—and which are very certain to be true, or very near the truth; that is to say, true in the general: for no man could at such a time learn all the particulars. There was likewise violence used with the watchmen, as was reported, in abundance of places; and I believe that from the beginning of the visitation to the end, there was not less than eighteen or twenty of them killed, or so wounded as to be taken up for dead, which was supposed to be done by the people in the infected houses which were shut up, and where they attempted to come out and were opposed.

I could share a lot of stories like these, quite entertaining, that I came across during that bleak year—I mean, I heard about them—and they are very likely true or pretty close to the truth; essentially, true in a general sense, since no one could learn all the details during such a time. There was also reported violence against the watchmen in many places, and I believe that from the start of the outbreak to the end, at least eighteen or twenty of them were killed or so badly injured that they were thought to be dead, which was probably caused by the people in the quarantined houses who tried to come out and were resisted.

Nor, indeed, could less be expected, for here were so many prisons in the town as there were houses shut up; and as the people shut up or imprisoned so were guilty of no crime, only shut up because miserable, it was really the more intolerable to them.

Nor could less be expected, because there were just as many prisons in the town as there were houses that were locked up; and since the people who were shut in or imprisoned had committed no crime, but were just confined due to their misery, it was even more unbearable for them.

It had also this difference, that every prison, as we may call it, had but one jailer, and as he had the whole house to guard, and that many houses were so situated as that they had several ways out, some more, some less, and some into several streets, it was impossible for one man so to guard all the passages as to prevent the escape of people made desperate by the fright of their circumstances, by the resentment of their usage, or by the raging of the distemper itself; so that they would talk to the watchman on one side of the house, while the family made their escape at another.

Every prison, as we might call it, had only one jailer, and since he had to guard the entire building, and many buildings were situated in such a way that they had multiple exits—some more, some less, and some leading to various streets—it was impossible for one person to monitor all the exits to stop desperate individuals from escaping due to their terrifying situation, their anger over their treatment, or the fury of the illness itself. So, they would distract the guard on one side of the building while the family slipped away from another.

For example, in Coleman Street there are abundance of alleys, as appears still. A house was shut up in that they call White’s Alley; and this house had a back-window, not a door, into a court which had a passage into Bell Alley. A watchman was set by the constable at the door of this house, and there he stood, or his comrade, night and day, while the family went all away in the evening out at that window into the court, and left the poor fellows warding and watching for near a fortnight.

For example, in Coleman Street, there are plenty of alleys, as it still shows today. There was a house shut up that they call White’s Alley; this house had a back window, not a door, leading into a courtyard that connected to Bell Alley. A watchman was assigned by the constable to stand at the door of this house, and he was there, or his partner, day and night, while the family left every evening through that window into the courtyard, leaving the poor guys guarding and watching for almost two weeks.

Not far from the same place they blew up a watchman with gunpowder, and burned the poor fellow dreadfully; and while he made hideous cries, and nobody would venture to come near to help him, the whole family that were able to stir got out at the windows one storey high, two that were left sick calling out for help. Care was taken to give them nurses to look after them, but the persons fled were never found, till after the plague was abated they returned; but as nothing could be proved, so nothing could be done to them.

Not far from where they blew up a guard with gunpowder and seriously burned him, he screamed in agony while no one dared to come close to help. The whole family who could move escaped through the windows on the second floor, leaving behind two sick people calling for assistance. They ensured that nurses were provided for those who remained, but the ones who fled were never found until after the plague had passed; since nothing could be proven, nothing could be done to them.

It is to be considered, too, that as these were prisons without bars and bolts, which our common prisons are furnished with, so the people let themselves down out of their windows, even in the face of the watchman, bringing swords or pistols in their hands, and threatening the poor wretch to shoot him if he stirred or called for help.

It should also be noted that since these were prisons without bars and locks, unlike our usual jails, people would lower themselves out of their windows, even in front of the guard, bringing swords or pistols with them, and threatening the unfortunate guy that they would shoot him if he moved or called for help.

In other cases, some had gardens, and walls or pales, between them and their neighbours, or yards and back-houses; and these, by friendship and entreaties, would get leave to get over those walls or pales, and so go out at their neighbours’ doors; or, by giving money to their servants, get them to let them through in the night; so that in short, the shutting up of houses was in no wise to be depended upon. Neither did it answer the end at all, serving more to make the people desperate, and drive them to such extremities as that they would break out at all adventures.

In some cases, people had gardens with walls or fences separating them from their neighbors, or had yards and back houses. Through friendship and requests, they would get permission to go over those walls or fences and exit through their neighbors' doors; or, by paying their servants, they would manage to sneak through at night. So, honestly, locking up houses wasn't reliable at all. It didn’t really serve its purpose, as it only made people feel desperate and pushed them to such extremes that they would find ways to break out no matter what.

And that which was still worse, those that did thus break out spread the infection farther by their wandering about with the distemper upon them, in their desperate circumstances, than they would otherwise have done; for whoever considers all the particulars in such cases must acknowledge, and we cannot doubt but the severity of those confinements made many people desperate, and made them run out of their houses at all hazards, and with the plague visibly upon them, not knowing either whither to go or what to do, or, indeed, what they did; and many that did so were driven to dreadful exigencies and extremities, and perished in the streets or fields for mere want, or dropped down by the raging violence of the fever upon them. Others wandered into the country, and went forward any way, as their desperation guided them, not knowing whither they went or would go: till, faint and tired, and not getting any relief, the houses and villages on the road refusing to admit them to lodge whether infected or no, they have perished by the roadside or gotten into barns and died there, none daring to come to them or relieve them, though perhaps not infected, for nobody would believe them.

And what was even worse, those who broke out spread the infection further by wandering around with the disease, in their desperate situations, than they would have otherwise; because anyone who thinks about all the details in these cases must acknowledge, and we can't doubt that the harshness of those confinements drove many people to despair, making them rush out of their houses at any risk, with the plague clearly affecting them, not knowing where to go, what to do, or even what they were doing; and many who did so faced terrible situations and extremes, perishing in the streets or fields from sheer hunger, or collapsing from the intense fever. Others wandered into the countryside, moving forward however their desperation led them, unaware of where they were going or would end up: until, exhausted and weary, and without finding any help, the homes and villages along the way refusing to let them stay regardless of whether they were infected or not, they died by the roadside or found their way into barns and passed away there, with no one daring to approach them or offer assistance, even if they might not have been infected, because no one would believe them.

On the other hand, when the plague at first seized a family that is to say, when any body of the family had gone out and unwarily or otherwise catched the distemper and brought it home—it was certainly known by the family before it was known to the officers, who, as you will see by the order, were appointed to examine into the circumstances of all sick persons when they heard of their being sick.

On the other hand, when the plague first hit a family—that is, when someone in the family went out and carelessly or otherwise caught the disease and brought it home—it was definitely known by the family before the officials found out. As you will see in the order, those officials were assigned to investigate the situations of all sick individuals once they became aware that someone was ill.

In this interval, between their being taken sick and the examiners coming, the master of the house had leisure and liberty to remove himself or all his family, if he knew whither to go, and many did so. But the great disaster was that many did thus after they were really infected themselves, and so carried the disease into the houses of those who were so hospitable as to receive them; which, it must be confessed, was very cruel and ungrateful.

During this time, between getting sick and the examiners arriving, the head of the household had the time and freedom to move himself or his entire family, if he knew where to go, and many did. However, the significant tragedy was that many did this after they were truly infected themselves, spreading the disease to the homes of those who were kind enough to welcome them; which, it must be acknowledged, was very cruel and ungrateful.

And this was in part the reason of the general notion, or scandal rather, which went about of the temper of people infected: namely, that they did not take the least care or make any scruple of infecting others, though I cannot say but there might be some truth in it too, but not so general as was reported. What natural reason could be given for so wicked a thing at a time when they might conclude themselves just going to appear at the bar of Divine justice I know not. I am very well satisfied that it cannot be reconciled to religion and principle any more than it can be to generosity and Humanity, but I may speak of that again.

And this was partly why there was a widespread belief, or rather scandal, about the behavior of infected people: namely, that they didn’t care at all or even hesitate to infect others. While there may have been some truth to it, it wasn’t as widespread as it was reported. I can’t think of any reasonable explanation for such a terrible thing at a time when they might have expected to face Divine justice. I’m pretty convinced that this behavior can't be reconciled with religion and principles any more than it can be with generosity and humanity, but I might discuss that further later.

I am speaking now of people made desperate by the apprehensions of their being shut up, and their breaking out by stratagem or force, either before or after they were shut up, whose misery was not lessened when they were out, but sadly increased. On the other hand, many that thus got away had retreats to go to and other houses, where they locked themselves up and kept hid till the plague was over; and many families, foreseeing the approach of the distemper, laid up stores of provisions sufficient for their whole families, and shut themselves up, and that so entirely that they were neither seen or heard of till the infection was quite ceased, and then came abroad sound and well. I might recollect several such as these, and give you the particulars of their management; for doubtless it was the most effectual secure step that could be taken for such whose circumstances would not admit them to remove, or who had not retreats abroad proper for the case; for in being thus shut up they were as if they had been a hundred miles off. Nor do I remember that any one of those families miscarried. Among these, several Dutch merchants were particularly remarkable, who kept their houses like little garrisons besieged suffering none to go in or out or come near them, particularly one in a court in Throgmorton Street whose house looked into Draper’s Garden.

I'm talking now about people who became desperate because they were afraid of being shut in, and how they tried to escape through clever plans or force, whether before or after they were locked up. Their suffering didn’t diminish when they got out; in fact, it got worse. On the flip side, many who managed to escape had safe places to go, other homes where they locked themselves away and stayed hidden until the plague passed. Many families, anticipating the spread of the disease, stocked up on enough supplies for everyone and completely shut themselves in so that no one saw or heard from them until the infection had completely cleared. When they finally emerged, they were healthy and well. I could remember several such cases and share the details of how they managed, as it was undoubtedly the most effective way to stay safe for those who couldn’t leave or hadn’t had anywhere suitable to retreat to. By staying inside, they might as well have been hundreds of miles away. I don't recall any of those families suffering misfortune. Among them, several Dutch merchants stood out, who treated their homes like small fortresses, not allowing anyone to enter, leave, or even come near them, particularly one house in a courtyard on Throgmorton Street that overlooked Draper’s Garden.

But I come back to the case of families infected and shut up by the magistrates. The misery of those families is not to be expressed; and it was generally in such houses that we heard the most dismal shrieks and outcries of the poor people, terrified and even frighted to death by the sight of the condition of their dearest relations, and by the terror of being imprisoned as they were.

But I return to the situation of families who were infected and confined by the authorities. The suffering of those families is beyond words; it was usually in those homes that we heard the most heartbreaking screams and cries from the poor people, terrified and even scared to death by the sight of their loved ones' condition, and by the fear of being locked up like they were.

I remember, and while I am writing this story I think I hear the very sound of it, a certain lady had an only daughter, a young maiden about nineteen years old, and who was possessed of a very considerable fortune. They were only lodgers in the house where they were. The young woman, her mother, and the maid had been abroad on some occasion, I do not remember what, for the house was not shut up; but about two hours after they came home the young lady complained she was not well; in a quarter of an hour more she vomited and had a violent pain in her head. ‘Pray God’, says her mother, in a terrible fright, ‘my child has not the distemper!’ The pain in her head increasing, her mother ordered the bed to be warmed, and resolved to put her to bed, and prepared to give her things to sweat, which was the ordinary remedy to be taken when the first apprehensions of the distemper began.

I remember, and as I write this story, I think I can hear it, a certain woman had an only daughter, a young girl about nineteen years old, who had a significant fortune. They were just renting a place in the house where they were living. The young woman, her mother, and the maid had been away for some reason I can't recall, since the house wasn’t closed up; but about two hours after they returned home, the young lady said she wasn’t feeling well. In another fifteen minutes, she threw up and had a severe headache. “Oh God,” her mother said, terrified, “I hope my child doesn’t have the illness!” As the headache worsened, her mother had the bed warmed, decided to put her to bed, and got ready to give her things to help her sweat, which was the usual remedy when the first signs of illness appeared.

While the bed was airing the mother undressed the young woman, and just as she was laid down in the bed, she, looking upon her body with a candle, immediately discovered the fatal tokens on the inside of her thighs. Her mother, not being able to contain herself, threw down her candle and shrieked out in such a frightful manner that it was enough to place horror upon the stoutest heart in the world; nor was it one scream or one cry, but the fright having seized her spirits, she—fainted first, then recovered, then ran all over the house, up the stairs and down the stairs, like one distracted, and indeed really was distracted, and continued screeching and crying out for several hours void of all sense, or at least government of her senses, and, as I was told, never came thoroughly to herself again. As to the young maiden, she was a dead corpse from that moment, for the gangrene which occasions the spots had spread [over] her whole body, and she died in less than two hours. But still the mother continued crying out, not knowing anything more of her child, several hours after she was dead. It is so long ago that I am not certain, but I think the mother never recovered, but died in two or three weeks after.

While the bed was airing out, the mother undressed the young woman, and just as she was laid down in the bed, she looked at her body with a candle and immediately noticed the shocking marks on the inside of her thighs. The mother, unable to control herself, dropped the candle and screamed in such a terrifying way that it could frighten the bravest person in the world; it wasn’t just one scream or cry, but the shock took hold of her, and she fainted, then came to, then ran around the house, up and down the stairs, like someone out of their mind, and indeed she was really out of her mind. She continued to screech and cry for several hours without any sense of control, and as I was told, she never fully regained her composure. As for the young woman, she was essentially dead from that moment on, because the gangrene that caused the spots had spread throughout her whole body, and she died in less than two hours. Meanwhile, the mother kept crying out, unaware of her child's fate, for several hours after she had passed. It’s been so long that I’m not completely sure, but I think the mother never recovered and died two or three weeks later.

This was an extraordinary case, and I am therefore the more particular in it, because I came so much to the knowledge of it; but there were innumerable such-like cases, and it was seldom that the weekly bill came in but there were two or three put in, ‘frighted’; that is, that may well be called frighted to death. But besides those who were so frighted as to die upon the spot, there were great numbers frighted to other extremes, some frighted out of their senses, some out of their memory, and some out of their understanding. But I return to the shutting up of houses.

This was an exceptional case, and I'm going into detail because I learned so much about it; however, there were countless similar cases, and it was rare for the weekly report to come in without at least two or three marked as ‘frighted’; that is, well described as scared to death. Besides those who were so terrified they died on the spot, many others were extremely affected—some were scared out of their wits, some lost their memories, and some their ability to think clearly. But I’ll go back to discussing the closing of houses.

As several people, I say, got out of their houses by stratagem after they were shut up, so others got out by bribing the watchmen, and giving them money to let them go privately out in the night. I must confess I thought it at that time the most innocent corruption or bribery that any man could be guilty of, and therefore could not but pity the poor men, and think it was hard when three of those watchmen were publicly whipped through the streets for suffering people to go out of houses shut up.

As many people did, I say, managed to sneak out of their homes after being locked up, while others got out by paying off the guards and giving them money to let them leave quietly at night. I have to admit that at that time, I thought it was the most harmless form of corruption or bribery anyone could commit, and so I couldn't help but feel sorry for those poor guys, thinking it was unfair that three of those guards were publicly whipped through the streets for allowing people to escape from locked houses.

But notwithstanding that severity, money prevailed with the poor men, and many families found means to make sallies out, and escape that way after they had been shut up; but these were generally such as had some places to retire to; and though there was no easy passing the roads any whither after the 1st of August, yet there were many ways of retreat, and particularly, as I hinted, some got tents and set them up in the fields, carrying beds or straw to lie on, and provisions to eat, and so lived in them as hermits in a cell, for nobody would venture to come near them; and several stories were told of such, some comical, some tragical, some who lived like wandering pilgrims in the deserts, and escaped by making themselves exiles in such a manner as is scarce to be credited, and who yet enjoyed more liberty than was to be expected in such cases.

But despite that strictness, money worked for the poor people, and many families found ways to sneak out and escape after they had been locked up; these were mostly those who had some places to go. Even though it wasn't easy to travel anywhere after August 1st, there were still many ways to get away. In particular, as I mentioned, some people got tents and set them up in the fields, bringing beds or straw to sleep on, and food to eat. They lived in them like hermits in a cell because no one dared to approach them. There were several stories about these people — some funny, some tragic — some lived like wandering pilgrims in the deserts and escaped by exiling themselves in ways that are hard to believe, yet they enjoyed more freedom than you would expect in such situations.

I have by me a story of two brothers and their kinsman, who being single men, but that had stayed in the city too long to get away, and indeed not knowing where to go to have any retreat, nor having wherewith to travel far, took a course for their own preservation, which though in itself at first desperate, yet was so natural that it may be wondered that no more did so at that time. They were but of mean condition, and yet not so very poor as that they could not furnish themselves with some little conveniences such as might serve to keep life and soul together; and finding the distemper increasing in a terrible manner, they resolved to shift as well as they could, and to be gone.

I have a story about two brothers and their relative who, being single men, had stayed in the city too long without knowing how to leave or where to go for safety. They didn’t have the means to travel far, so they decided on a course of action for their own survival, which, while it seemed desperate at first, was so logical that it’s surprising more people didn't do the same at that time. They were of modest means, but not so poor that they couldn’t manage some basic necessities to keep themselves going. As they saw the situation getting worse, they resolved to make a move and leave as best as they could.

One of them had been a soldier in the late wars, and before that in the Low Countries, and having been bred to no particular employment but his arms, and besides being wounded, and not able to work very hard, had for some time been employed at a baker’s of sea-biscuit in Wapping.

One of them had been a soldier in the recent wars, and before that in the Low Countries. He didn't have a specific job apart from being a soldier, and since he was wounded and couldn't do hard labor, he had been working for a while at a bakery making sea biscuits in Wapping.

The brother of this man was a seaman too, but somehow or other had been hurt of one leg, that he could not go to sea, but had worked for his living at a sailmaker’s in Wapping, or thereabouts; and being a good husband, had laid up some money, and was the richest of the three.

The brother of this man was also a sailor, but somehow he had injured one of his legs, which meant he couldn’t go to sea. Instead, he earned his living working at a sailmaker’s in Wapping or nearby. Being a good provider, he had saved up some money and was the richest of the three.

The third man was a joiner or carpenter by trade, a handy fellow, and he had no wealth but his box or basket of tools, with the help of which he could at any time get his living, such a time as this excepted, wherever he went—and he lived near Shadwell.

The third man was a carpenter by trade, a skilled worker, and he had no wealth except for his toolbox, which he could use to make a living anytime, except for times like this, wherever he went—and he lived near Shadwell.

They all lived in Stepney parish, which, as I have said, being the last that was infected, or at least violently, they stayed there till they evidently saw the plague was abating at the west part of the town, and coming towards the east, where they lived.

They all lived in Stepney parish, which, as I mentioned, was the last one to be hit by the plague, or at least hit hard. They stayed there until they clearly saw that the outbreak was decreasing in the western part of the town and moving towards the east, where they lived.

The story of those three men, if the reader will be content to have me give it in their own persons, without taking upon me to either vouch the particulars or answer for any mistakes, I shall give as distinctly as I can, believing the history will be a very good pattern for any poor man to follow, in case the like public desolation should happen here; and if there may be no such occasion, which God of His infinite mercy grant us, still the story may have its uses so many ways as that it will, I hope, never be said that the relating has been unprofitable.

The story of those three men, if you’re okay with me telling it from their perspective, without taking responsibility for the details or any potential errors, I’ll share it as clearly as I can. I believe this history could serve as a great example for any struggling person to follow, in case something similar ever happens here. And even if we don’t face such a disaster, which I hope God in His infinite mercy grants us, the story can still be useful in many ways, so I hope it won’t be said that sharing it was a waste.

I say all this previous to the history, having yet, for the present, much more to say before I quit my own part.

I mention all this before the story, as I still have a lot more to share before I finish my own role.

I went all the first part of the time freely about the streets, though not so freely as to run myself into apparent danger, except when they dug the great pit in the churchyard of our parish of Aldgate. A terrible pit it was, and I could not resist my curiosity to go and see it. As near as I may judge, it was about forty feet in length, and about fifteen or sixteen feet broad, and at the time I first looked at it, about nine feet deep; but it was said they dug it near twenty feet deep afterwards in one part of it, till they could go no deeper for the water; for they had, it seems, dug several large pits before this. For though the plague was long a-coming to our parish, yet, when it did come, there was no parish in or about London where it raged with such violence as in the two parishes of Aldgate and Whitechappel.

I spent the early part of my time wandering the streets, although I was careful not to put myself in obvious danger—except when they were digging the big pit in the churchyard of our parish in Aldgate. It was a frightening pit, and I couldn't help but be curious enough to check it out. From what I could tell, it was about forty feet long and around fifteen or sixteen feet wide, and at the first time I looked at it, it was about nine feet deep. However, I heard they ended up digging it nearly twenty feet deep in one spot until they couldn't go any deeper because of the water, as they'd already dug several large pits before this one. While the plague took a while to reach our parish, when it finally did, no other parish in or around London was hit as hard as Aldgate and Whitechapel.

I say they had dug several pits in another ground, when the distemper began to spread in our parish, and especially when the dead-carts began to go about, which was not, in our parish, till the beginning of August. Into these pits they had put perhaps fifty or sixty bodies each; then they made larger holes wherein they buried all that the cart brought in a week, which, by the middle to the end of August, came to from 200 to 400 a week; and they could not well dig them larger, because of the order of the magistrates confining them to leave no bodies within six feet of the surface; and the water coming on at about seventeen or eighteen feet, they could not well, I say, put more in one pit. But now, at the beginning of September, the plague raging in a dreadful manner, and the number of burials in our parish increasing to more than was ever buried in any parish about London of no larger extent, they ordered this dreadful gulf to be dug—for such it was, rather than a pit.

I say they had dug several pits in another area when the outbreak started to spread in our parish, especially when the dead-carts began to go around, which happened in our parish only at the beginning of August. They had placed about fifty or sixty bodies in each of these pits; then they made larger holes to bury everything the cart brought in a week, which, by the middle to the end of August, totaled between 200 and 400 a week. They couldn’t dig them any bigger because the magistrates ordered them to not leave any bodies within six feet of the surface, and with the water coming in at about seventeen or eighteen feet deep, they couldn’t really add more in one pit. But now, at the beginning of September, with the plague spreading in a terrible way and the number of burials in our parish rising to levels never seen before in any parish around London of similar size, they ordered this dreadful hole to be dug—for that’s what it was, more a gulf than a pit.

They had supposed this pit would have supplied them for a month or more when they dug it, and some blamed the churchwardens for suffering such a frightful thing, telling them they were making preparations to bury the whole parish, and the like; but time made it appear the churchwardens knew the condition of the parish better than they did: for, the pit being finished the 4th of September, I think, they began to bury in it the 6th, and by the 20th, which was just two weeks, they had thrown into it 1114 bodies when they were obliged to fill it up, the bodies being then come to lie within six feet of the surface. I doubt not but there may be some ancient persons alive in the parish who can justify the fact of this, and are able to show even in what place of the churchyard the pit lay better than I can. The mark of it also was many years to be seen in the churchyard on the surface, lying in length parallel with the passage which goes by the west wall of the churchyard out of Houndsditch, and turns east again into Whitechappel, coming out near the Three Nuns’ Inn.

They thought this pit would last them for a month or more when they dug it, and some people blamed the churchwardens for allowing such a terrible thing, accusing them of preparing to bury the entire parish and similar comments. But as time went on, it became clear that the churchwardens understood the parish's situation better than the critics did. The pit was finished on September 4th, and they started burying people in it on the 6th. By the 20th, just two weeks later, they had buried 1,114 bodies before they had to fill it in, as the bodies had come to rest just six feet below the surface. I’m sure there are some older residents in the parish who can confirm this and probably even tell you exactly where in the churchyard the pit was located better than I can. The outline of it was visible for many years on the surface of the churchyard, running parallel to the path that goes along the west wall of the churchyard from Houndsditch, then turning east again into Whitechapel, coming out near the Three Nuns’ Inn.

It was about the 10th of September that my curiosity led, or rather drove, me to go and see this pit again, when there had been near 400 people buried in it; and I was not content to see it in the day-time, as I had done before, for then there would have been nothing to have been seen but the loose earth; for all the bodies that were thrown in were immediately covered with earth by those they called the buriers, which at other times were called bearers; but I resolved to go in the night and see some of them thrown in.

It was around the 10th of September when my curiosity pushed me to visit this pit again, where nearly 400 people had been buried. I wasn't satisfied with just seeing it during the day like last time, because then all I would see was the loose dirt; all the bodies that were tossed in were immediately covered by those they referred to as buriers, who were called bearers at other times. So, I decided to go at night and watch some of them being buried.

There was a strict order to prevent people coming to those pits, and that was only to prevent infection. But after some time that order was more necessary, for people that were infected and near their end, and delirious also, would run to those pits, wrapt in blankets or rugs, and throw themselves in, and, as they said, bury themselves. I cannot say that the officers suffered any willingly to lie there; but I have heard that in a great pit in Finsbury, in the parish of Cripplegate, it lying open then to the fields, for it was not then walled about, [many] came and threw themselves in, and expired there, before they threw any earth upon them; and that when they came to bury others and found them there, they were quite dead, though not cold.

There was a strict rule to keep people away from those pits, and it was meant to prevent infection. But over time, that rule became even more important, because infected people nearing the end and in delirium would run to those pits, wrapped in blankets or rugs, and throw themselves in, claiming they wanted to bury themselves. I can't say that the officers allowed anyone to lie there willingly; however, I've heard that in a large pit in Finsbury, in the parish of Cripplegate, which was open to the fields at the time since it wasn’t walled off, many came and jumped in, dying there before anyone covered them with dirt; and when they came to bury others and found them there, they were completely dead, though not yet cold.

This may serve a little to describe the dreadful condition of that day, though it is impossible to say anything that is able to give a true idea of it to those who did not see it, other than this, that it was indeed very, very, very dreadful, and such as no tongue can express.

This might help to give a glimpse of the horrible state of that day, but it's impossible to explain it accurately to those who didn't witness it, except to say that it was truly, truly, truly awful, and beyond any words to describe.

I got admittance into the churchyard by being acquainted with the sexton who attended; who, though he did not refuse me at all, yet earnestly persuaded me not to go, telling me very seriously (for he was a good, religious, and sensible man) that it was indeed their business and duty to venture, and to run all hazards, and that in it they might hope to be preserved; but that I had no apparent call to it but my own curiosity, which, he said, he believed I would not pretend was sufficient to justify my running that hazard. I told him I had been pressed in my mind to go, and that perhaps it might be an instructing sight, that might not be without its uses. ‘Nay,’ says the good man, ‘if you will venture upon that score, name of God go in; for, depend upon it, ’twill be a sermon to you, it may be, the best that ever you heard in your life. ’Tis a speaking sight,’ says he, ‘and has a voice with it, and a loud one, to call us all to repentance’; and with that he opened the door and said, ‘Go, if you will.’

I got into the churchyard because I knew the sexton who was on duty. He didn’t stop me from going in, but he strongly urged me not to, seriously explaining (since he was a good, religious, and sensible man) that it was their responsibility to take risks and face dangers, and that in doing so they might hope to be safe. But I didn’t have any compelling reason to go besides my own curiosity, which he believed I wouldn’t claim was enough to justify taking that risk. I told him I felt a strong urge to go and that it might be an eye-opening experience that could be beneficial. “Well,” said the good man, “if you’re willing to go for that reason, then for goodness’ sake, go in; because trust me, it might be the best sermon you ever hear in your life. It’s a powerful sight,” he said, “and it calls out to us all to repent.” With that, he opened the door and said, “Go, if you want.”

His discourse had shocked my resolution a little, and I stood wavering for a good while, but just at that interval I saw two links come over from the end of the Minories, and heard the bellman, and then appeared a dead-cart, as they called it, coming over the streets; so I could no longer resist my desire of seeing it, and went in. There was nobody, as I could perceive at first, in the churchyard, or going into it, but the buriers and the fellow that drove the cart, or rather led the horse and cart; but when they came up to the pit they saw a man go to and again, muffled up in a brown Cloak, and making motions with his hands under his cloak, as if he was in great agony, and the buriers immediately gathered about him, supposing he was one of those poor delirious or desperate creatures that used to pretend, as I have said, to bury themselves. He said nothing as he walked about, but two or three times groaned very deeply and loud, and sighed as he would break his heart.

His speech had shaken my resolve a bit, and I stood hesitating for a while, but just then I saw two links come over from the end of the Minories and heard the bellman. Then a dead cart, as they called it, appeared on the street; so I could no longer resist my urge to see it and went in. At first, there was nobody in the churchyard or going into it, except for the grave diggers and the guy who drove the cart, or rather, led the horse and cart. But when they approached the pit, they noticed a man moving around, bundled up in a brown cloak, making gestures with his hands under the cloak, as if he were in great distress. The buriers quickly gathered around him, thinking he was one of those poor, delirious, or desperate people who used to pretend, as I mentioned, to bury themselves. He didn’t say anything as he walked around, but a couple of times he let out deep, loud groans and sighed as if his heart would break.

When the buriers came up to him they soon found he was neither a person infected and desperate, as I have observed above, or a person distempered—in mind, but one oppressed with a dreadful weight of grief indeed, having his wife and several of his children all in the cart that was just come in with him, and he followed in an agony and excess of sorrow. He mourned heartily, as it was easy to see, but with a kind of masculine grief that could not give itself vent by tears; and calmly defying the buriers to let him alone, said he would only see the bodies thrown in and go away, so they left importuning him. But no sooner was the cart turned round and the bodies shot into the pit promiscuously, which was a surprise to him, for he at least expected they would have been decently laid in, though indeed he was afterwards convinced that was impracticable; I say, no sooner did he see the sight but he cried out aloud, unable to contain himself. I could not hear what he said, but he went backward two or three steps and fell down in a swoon. The buriers ran to him and took him up, and in a little while he came to himself, and they led him away to the Pie Tavern over against the end of Houndsditch, where, it seems, the man was known, and where they took care of him. He looked into the pit again as he went away, but the buriers had covered the bodies so immediately with throwing in earth, that though there was light enough, for there were lanterns, and candles in them, placed all night round the sides of the pit, upon heaps of earth, seven or eight, or perhaps more, yet nothing could be seen.

When the buriers approached him, they quickly realized he wasn’t someone desperate and infected, as I mentioned earlier, nor was he mentally unwell. Instead, he was burdened by a heavy grief, having his wife and several of his children all in the cart that had just arrived with him. He followed in deep sorrow, mourning with a visible pain, but it was a stoic form of grief that couldn’t express itself through tears. He calmly challenged the buriers to leave him alone, insisting he would only watch the bodies be disposed of and then leave, so they stopped urging him to move. But as soon as the cart turned and the bodies were unceremoniously dumped into the pit—an unexpected turn for him, as he thought they might be laid to rest decently, even though he later understood that was impossible—he could not hold back any longer. At the sight, he cried out loudly, unable to contain himself. I couldn’t catch what he said, but he stepped back a few steps and collapsed in a faint. The buriers rushed to help him, and after a short time, he regained consciousness, and they took him to the Pie Tavern across from the end of Houndsditch, where he was recognized and cared for. He glanced back at the pit as he was leaving, but the buriers had quickly covered the bodies with earth, so despite the ample light from lanterns and candles placed all night around the pit on mounds of dirt—seven, eight, or perhaps more—nothing was visible.

This was a mournful scene indeed, and affected me almost as much as the rest; but the other was awful and full of terror. The cart had in it sixteen or seventeen bodies; some were wrapt up in linen sheets, some in rags, some little other than naked, or so loose that what covering they had fell from them in the shooting out of the cart, and they fell quite naked among the rest; but the matter was not much to them, or the indecency much to any one else, seeing they were all dead, and were to be huddled together into the common grave of mankind, as we may call it, for here was no difference made, but poor and rich went together; there was no other way of burials, neither was it possible there should, for coffins were not to be had for the prodigious numbers that fell in such a calamity as this.

This was indeed a heartbreaking scene, and it affected me almost as much as the others; but the other was horrifying and full of dread. The cart held about sixteen or seventeen bodies; some were wrapped in linen sheets, some in rags, and some were almost completely naked, or so loosely covered that their coverings fell off as they were pulled from the cart, leaving them entirely exposed among the others. But this didn't matter much to them, or the decency of it to anyone else, since they were all dead and were just going to be thrown into the shared grave of humanity, as we might say. There was no distinction made here; both the poor and the rich were treated the same. There was no other way to handle burials, nor could there have been, as coffins were unavailable for the overwhelming number of people who died in such a disaster.

It was reported by way of scandal upon the buriers, that if any corpse was delivered to them decently wound up, as we called it then, in a winding-sheet tied over the head and feet, which some did, and which was generally of good linen; I say, it was reported that the buriers were so wicked as to strip them in the cart and carry them quite naked to the ground. But as I cannot easily credit anything so vile among Christians, and at a time so filled with terrors as that was, I can only relate it and leave it undetermined.

It was rumored about the buriers that if any body was given to them properly wrapped, as we used to say, in a burial shroud tied at the head and feet—something some people did, typically made of good linen—it was said that the buriers were so cruel that they would strip the bodies in the cart and take them completely naked to the grave. However, since I find it hard to believe anything so horrible could happen among Christians, especially during such a terrifying time, I can only share this account and leave it unresolved.

Innumerable stories also went about of the cruel behaviours and practices of nurses who tended the sick, and of their hastening on the fate of those they tended in their sickness. But I shall say more of this in its place.

Innumerable stories also circulated about the cruel actions and practices of nurses who cared for the sick, and how they expedited the fate of those they looked after in their illness. But I will discuss this more thoroughly later.

I was indeed shocked with this sight; it almost overwhelmed me, and I went away with my heart most afflicted, and full of the afflicting thoughts, such as I cannot describe just at my going out of the church, and turning up the street towards my own house, I saw another cart with links, and a bellman going before, coming out of Harrow Alley in the Butcher Row, on the other side of the way, and being, as I perceived, very full of dead bodies, it went directly over the street also toward the church. I stood a while, but I had no stomach to go back again to see the same dismal scene over again, so I went directly home, where I could not but consider with thankfulness the risk I had run, believing I had gotten no injury, as indeed I had not.

I was truly shocked by this sight; it nearly overwhelmed me, leaving my heart heavy and full of troubling thoughts that I can’t even describe. As I left the church and walked up the street toward my house, I saw another cart with torches and a bellman walking in front, coming out of Harrow Alley on the opposite side of the street. It seemed to be filled with dead bodies and was heading straight toward the church, too. I paused for a moment, but I didn’t have the stomach to go back and see that grim scene again, so I went straight home, where I couldn’t help but feel grateful for the risk I had faced, believing I had come away unhurt, which I had.

Here the poor unhappy gentleman’s grief came into my head again, and indeed I could not but shed tears in the reflection upon it, perhaps more than he did himself; but his case lay so heavy upon my mind that I could not prevail with myself, but that I must go out again into the street, and go to the Pie Tavern, resolving to inquire what became of him.

Here, the sad gentleman's sorrow came to mind again, and I couldn't help but cry when I thought about it, maybe even more than he did. His situation weighed so heavily on my mind that I felt I had to go back out into the street and head to the Pie Tavern, planning to find out what happened to him.

It was by this time one o’clock in the morning, and yet the poor gentleman was there. The truth was, the people of the house, knowing him, had entertained him, and kept him there all the night, notwithstanding the danger of being infected by him, though it appeared the man was perfectly sound himself.

It was already one o’clock in the morning, and yet the poor guy was still there. The truth was, the people in the house knew him and had entertained him, keeping him there all night despite the risk of catching something from him, even though it seemed he was perfectly healthy himself.

It is with regret that I take notice of this tavern. The people were civil, mannerly, and an obliging sort of folks enough, and had till this time kept their house open and their trade going on, though not so very publicly as formerly: but there was a dreadful set of fellows that used their house, and who, in the middle of all this horror, met there every night, behaved with all the revelling and roaring extravagances as is usual for such people to do at other times, and, indeed, to such an offensive degree that the very master and mistress of the house grew first ashamed and then terrified at them.

I regret to say that I have to mention this tavern. The people were polite, well-mannered, and generally nice enough, and until now, they had kept their place open and their business running, though not as openly as before. However, there was a terrifying group of guys who frequented their establishment, and amidst all this chaos, they gathered there every night, acting with all the loud and rowdy craziness typical of such people at other times, to such an extent that the owners of the tavern first felt ashamed and then frightened by them.

They sat generally in a room next the street, and as they always kept late hours, so when the dead-cart came across the street-end to go into Houndsditch, which was in view of the tavern windows, they would frequently open the windows as soon as they heard the bell and look out at them; and as they might often hear sad lamentations of people in the streets or at their windows as the carts went along, they would make their impudent mocks and jeers at them, especially if they heard the poor people call upon God to have mercy upon them, as many would do at those times in their ordinary passing along the streets.

They usually sat in a room by the street, and since they often kept late hours, whenever the dead cart came down the street to head into Houndsditch, which was visible from the tavern windows, they would frequently open the windows as soon as they heard the bell and look out at it. They often heard the sad cries of people in the streets or from their windows as the carts went by, and they would mock and make fun of them, especially if they heard the poor calling out to God for mercy, which many would do while walking along the streets at those times.

These gentlemen, being something disturbed with the clutter of bringing the poor gentleman into the house, as above, were first angry and very high with the master of the house for suffering such a fellow, as they called him, to be brought out of the grave into their house; but being answered that the man was a neighbour, and that he was sound, but overwhelmed with the calamity of his family, and the like, they turned their anger into ridiculing the man and his sorrow for his wife and children, taunted him with want of courage to leap into the great pit and go to heaven, as they jeeringly expressed it, along with them, adding some very profane and even blasphemous expressions.

These guys were pretty upset about having to bring the poor man into the house, as mentioned earlier. At first, they were angry and confrontational with the homeowner for allowing someone like him, as they called him, to be brought back from the dead into their home. But when they were told that the man was a neighbor, and that he was okay, just overwhelmed by his family’s troubles, they changed their anger into mocking him and his sadness for his wife and kids. They made fun of him for not having the guts to jump into the big pit and go to heaven, as they jokingly put it, and added some really disrespectful and even blasphemous comments.

They were at this vile work when I came back to the house, and, as far as I could see, though the man sat still, mute and disconsolate, and their affronts could not divert his sorrow, yet he was both grieved and offended at their discourse. Upon this I gently reproved them, being well enough acquainted with their characters, and not unknown in person to two of them.

They were at this terrible task when I returned to the house, and, as far as I could tell, even though the man sat quietly, silent and sad, and their insults couldn't distract him from his grief, he was still hurt and upset by what they were saying. So, I gently scolded them, being familiar with who they were, and I wasn't a stranger to two of them.

They immediately fell upon me with ill language and oaths, asked me what I did out of my grave at such a time when so many honester men were carried into the churchyard, and why I was not at home saying my prayers against the dead-cart came for me, and the like.

They immediately started yelling at me with harsh words and curses, asking why I was out of my grave at a time when so many more respectable people were being taken to the churchyard, and why I wasn't at home saying my prayers before the dead cart came for me, and so on.

I was indeed astonished at the impudence of the men, though not at all discomposed at their treatment of me. However, I kept my temper. I told them that though I defied them or any man in the world to tax me with any dishonesty, yet I acknowledged that in this terrible judgement of God many better than I were swept away and carried to their grave. But to answer their question directly, the case was, that I was mercifully preserved by that great God whose name they had blasphemed and taken in vain by cursing and swearing in a dreadful manner, and that I believed I was preserved in particular, among other ends of His goodness, that I might reprove them for their audacious boldness in behaving in such a manner and in such an awful time as this was, especially for their jeering and mocking at an honest gentleman and a neighbour (for some of them knew him), who, they saw, was overwhelmed with sorrow for the breaches which it had pleased God to make upon his family.

I was genuinely shocked by the audacity of the men, but I wasn't upset by how they treated me. I managed to stay calm. I told them that while I dared any of them to claim I was dishonest, I recognized that in this terrible judgment from God, many better people than I had been taken away to their graves. But to answer their question directly, I was thankfully preserved by that great God whose name they had blasphemed by cursing and swearing in a horrific way. I believed I was spared, among other reasons, so that I could call them out for their boldness in acting like that during such a dreadful time, especially for mocking an honest man and neighbor (some of them knew him) who was clearly overwhelmed with grief over the losses that God had inflicted on his family.

I cannot call exactly to mind the hellish, abominable raillery which was the return they made to that talk of mine: being provoked, it seems, that I was not at all afraid to be free with them; nor, if I could remember, would I fill my account with any of the words, the horrid oaths, curses, and vile expressions, such as, at that time of the day, even the worst and ordinariest people in the street would not use; for, except such hardened creatures as these, the most wicked wretches that could be found had at that time some terror upon their minds of the hand of that Power which could thus in a moment destroy them.

I can't quite remember the terrible, disgusting mockery they threw back at me after my words. They seemed angry that I wasn't afraid to be open with them. Even if I could recall those moments, I wouldn't fill this account with their words, the awful curses and filthy expressions that even the most disreputable people on the street wouldn't use at that time of day. Except for those hardened individuals, even the most wicked people had some fear in their hearts of the power that could wipe them out in an instant.

But that which was the worst in all their devilish language was, that they were not afraid to blaspheme God and talk atheistically, making a jest of my calling the plague the hand of God; mocking, and even laughing, at the word judgement, as if the providence of God had no concern in the inflicting such a desolating stroke; and that the people calling upon God as they saw the carts carrying away the dead bodies was all enthusiastic, absurd, and impertinent.

But what was worst about all their wicked talk was that they weren’t afraid to disrespect God and speak atheistically, mocking my description of the plague as God's hand; they laughed at the idea of judgment, as if God's providence had nothing to do with such a devastating blow; and they dismissed the people who called on God as they saw the carts carrying away the dead bodies, labeling it all as enthusiastic, ridiculous, and disrespectful.

I made them some reply, such as I thought proper, but which I found was so far from putting a check to their horrid way of speaking that it made them rail the more, so that I confess it filled me with horror and a kind of rage, and I came away, as I told them, lest the hand of that judgement which had visited the whole city should glorify His vengeance upon them, and all that were near them.

I responded to them in a way that I thought was appropriate, but it only encouraged their terrible way of speaking even more. Honestly, it filled me with horror and a kind of anger, so I left, as I told them, to avoid the judgment that had fallen upon the entire city from bringing its punishment down on them and everyone nearby.

They received all reproof with the utmost contempt, and made the greatest mockery that was possible for them to do at me, giving me all the opprobrious, insolent scoffs that they could think of for preaching to them, as they called it, which indeed grieved me, rather than angered me; and I went away, blessing God, however, in my mind that I had not spared them, though they had insulted me so much.

They took all criticism with complete disdain and mocked me as much as they could, throwing at me all the nasty, arrogant taunts they could come up with for preaching to them, as they put it. Honestly, this bothered me more than it made me angry; still, I walked away, grateful in my thoughts that I hadn’t held back with them, even though they had insulted me so much.

They continued this wretched course three or four days after this, continually mocking and jeering at all that showed themselves religious or serious, or that were any way touched with the sense of the terrible judgement of God upon us; and I was informed they flouted in the same manner at the good people who, notwithstanding the contagion, met at the church, fasted, and prayed to God to remove His hand from them.

They kept this miserable behavior going for three or four days after that, constantly mocking and ridiculing everyone who showed any signs of being religious or serious, or who seemed aware of the terrible judgment of God upon us; and I learned that they also made fun of the good people who, despite the outbreak, gathered at the church, fasted, and prayed to God to lift His hand from them.

I say, they continued this dreadful course three or four days—I think it was no more—when one of them, particularly he who asked the poor gentleman what he did out of his grave, was struck from Heaven with the plague, and died in a most deplorable manner; and, in a word, they were every one of them carried into the great pit which I have mentioned above, before it was quite filled up, which was not above a fortnight or thereabout.

I say, they continued this terrible behavior for three or four days—I think it was no more—when one of them, especially the one who asked the poor gentleman what he was doing out of his grave, was struck down from Heaven with the plague and died in a very tragic way; and, in short, they were all taken to the big pit I mentioned earlier, before it was completely filled up, which was not more than about a fortnight later.

These men were guilty of many extravagances, such as one would think human nature should have trembled at the thoughts of at such a time of general terror as was then upon us, and particularly scoffing and mocking at everything which they happened to see that was religious among the people, especially at their thronging zealously to the place of public worship to implore mercy from Heaven in such a time of distress; and this tavern where they held their dub being within view of the church-door, they had the more particular occasion for their atheistical profane mirth.

These men engaged in many excesses that would make anyone tremble, especially during a time of widespread fear. They particularly mocked and ridiculed everything religious they saw among the people, especially their eager rush to public worship to seek mercy from Heaven during such a difficult time. Since the tavern where they gathered was in sight of the church door, they had even more reason for their blasphemous and disrespectful laughter.

But this began to abate a little with them before the accident which I have related happened, for the infection increased so violently at this part of the town now, that people began to be afraid to come to the church; at least such numbers did not resort thither as was usual. Many of the clergymen likewise were dead, and others gone into the country; for it really required a steady courage and a strong faith for a man not only to venture being in town at such a time as this, but likewise to venture to come to church and perform the office of a minister to a congregation, of whom he had reason to believe many of them were actually infected with the plague, and to do this every day, or twice a day, as in some places was done.

But this started to ease a bit before the accident I mentioned happened, because the outbreak was spreading so rapidly in this part of town that people became afraid to go to church; at least, fewer people attended than usual. Many clergy members were also dead, and others had left for the countryside; it really took a lot of courage and strong faith for someone to not only stay in town during such a time but also to come to church and minister to a congregation that he had good reason to believe included many who were actually infected with the plague, doing this daily, or even twice a day, as was done in some places.

It is true the people showed an extraordinary zeal in these religious exercises, and as the church-doors were always open, people would go in single at all times, whether the minister was officiating or no, and locking themselves into separate pews, would be praying to God with great fervency and devotion.

It's true that people showed remarkable enthusiasm for these religious activities, and since the church doors were always open, individuals would go in alone at any time, whether the minister was officiating or not. They would lock themselves in separate pews, praying to God with great intensity and devotion.

Others assembled at meeting-houses, every one as their different opinions in such things guided, but all were promiscuously the subject of these men’s drollery, especially at the beginning of the visitation.

Others gathered at meeting houses, each guided by their own opinions on these matters, but all were equally the target of these men's humor, especially at the start of the visit.

It seems they had been checked for their open insulting religion in this manner by several good people of every persuasion, and that, and the violent raging of the infection, I suppose, was the occasion that they had abated much of their rudeness for some time before, and were only roused by the spirit of ribaldry and atheism at the clamour which was made when the gentleman was first brought in there, and perhaps were agitated by the same devil, when I took upon me to reprove them; though I did it at first with all the calmness, temper, and good manners that I could, which for a while they insulted me the more for thinking it had been in fear of their resentment, though afterwards they found the contrary.

It seems they had been held in check for their openly insulting beliefs by several decent people from various backgrounds, and that, along with the intense spread of the infection, was likely why they had toned down their rudeness for a while before. They were only stirred up again by the spirit of mockery and atheism when the gentleman was first brought in, and maybe they were also provoked by the same trouble when I decided to confront them. I approached it at first with all the calmness, patience, and politeness I could manage, which for a time only made them insult me more because they thought I was afraid of their anger, though later they realized that wasn’t the case.

I went home, indeed, grieved and afflicted in my mind at the abominable wickedness of those men, not doubting, however, that they would be made dreadful examples of God’s justice; for I looked upon this dismal time to be a particular season of Divine vengeance, and that God would on this occasion single out the proper objects of His displeasure in a more especial and remarkable manner than at another time; and that though I did believe that many good people would, and did, fall in the common calamity, and that it was no certain rule to judge of the eternal state of any one by their being distinguished in such a time of general destruction neither one way or other; yet, I say, it could not but seem reasonable to believe that God would not think fit to spare by His mercy such open declared enemies, that should insult His name and Being, defy His vengeance, and mock at His worship and worshippers at such a time; no, not though His mercy had thought fit to bear with and spare them at other times; that this was a day of visitation, a day of God’s anger, and those words came into my thought, Jer. v. 9: ‘Shall I not visit for these things? saith the Lord: and shall not My soul be avenged of such a nation as this?’

I went home, truly upset and troubled by the horrible wickedness of those men, yet I had no doubt that they would become terrifying examples of God’s justice. I saw this grim time as a specific moment of Divine retribution, where God would highlight the proper targets of His anger more distinctly than at other times. While I believed that many good people would, and did, suffer in the general disaster, and that it wasn’t a definite way to judge anyone's eternal fate based on how they were treated during such a widespread crisis—either positively or negatively—I felt it was reasonable to think that God wouldn’t choose to show mercy to such openly declared enemies who insulted His name, defied His judgment, and mocked His worship and followers at such a time. Not even if His mercy had decided to tolerate and spare them in the past. This was a day of reckoning, a day of God’s anger, and those words came to mind, Jer. v. 9: ‘Shall I not visit for these things? says the Lord: and shall not My soul be avenged of such a nation as this?’

These things, I say, lay upon my mind, and I went home very much grieved and oppressed with the horror of these men’s wickedness, and to think that anything could be so vile, so hardened, and notoriously wicked as to insult God, and His servants, and His worship in such a manner, and at such a time as this was, when He had, as it were, His sword drawn in His hand on purpose to take vengeance not on them only, but on the whole nation.

These thoughts weighed heavily on my mind, and I went home feeling very sad and burdened by the horror of these men's wickedness. It was hard to believe that anything could be so vile and so shamelessly wicked as to insult God, His servants, and His worship in such a way and at such a time, when He seemed to be ready to take vengeance not only on them but on the entire nation.

I had, indeed, been in some passion at first with them—though it was really raised, not by any affront they had offered me personally, but by the horror their blaspheming tongues filled me with. However, I was doubtful in my thoughts whether the resentment I retained was not all upon my own private account, for they had given me a great deal of ill language too—I mean personally; but after some pause, and having a weight of grief upon my mind, I retired myself as soon as I came home, for I slept not that night; and giving God most humble thanks for my preservation in the eminent danger I had been in, I set my mind seriously and with the utmost earnestness to pray for those desperate wretches, that God would pardon them, open their eyes, and effectually humble them.

I was definitely upset with them at first—though it wasn't really because of anything they did to me personally, but more because of the horror their blasphemous words caused me. However, I started to wonder if my resentment was just about my own feelings, since they had also spoken to me harshly—I mean personally; but after thinking it over, and feeling a heavy sadness, I went home as soon as I could, and I couldn't sleep that night. I gave God my deepest thanks for keeping me safe from the serious danger I had faced, and I focused my thoughts seriously and with great urgency to pray for those desperate people, asking God to forgive them, open their eyes, and truly humble them.

By this I not only did my duty, namely, to pray for those who despitefully used me, but I fully tried my own heart, to my full satisfaction, that it was not filled with any spirit of resentment as they had offended me in particular; and I humbly recommend the method to all those that would know, or be certain, how to distinguish between their zeal for the honour of God and the effects of their private passions and resentment.

By doing this, I not only fulfilled my duty to pray for those who treated me badly, but I also examined my own heart and was completely satisfied that it wasn’t filled with any resentment just because they had wronged me specifically. I humbly suggest this approach to anyone who wants to understand how to tell the difference between their zeal for God's honor and the influence of their personal emotions and grudges.

But I must go back here to the particular incidents which occur to my thoughts of the time of the visitation, and particularly to the time of their shutting up houses in the first part of their sickness; for before the sickness was come to its height people had more room to make their observations than they had afterward; but when it was in the extremity there was no such thing as communication with one another, as before.

But I need to return to the specific events that come to mind from the time of the outbreak, especially the period when they first started closing homes due to the illness. Before the sickness reached its peak, people had more opportunities to share their observations than they did later on. Once it reached its worst, there was no longer any way to communicate with each other like before.

During the shutting up of houses, as I have said, some violence was offered to the watchmen. As to soldiers, there were none to be found. The few guards which the king then had, which were nothing like the number entertained since, were dispersed, either at Oxford with the Court, or in quarters in the remoter parts of the country, small detachments excepted, who did duty at the Tower and at Whitehall, and these but very few. Neither am I positive that there was any other guard at the Tower than the warders, as they called them, who stand at the gate with gowns and caps, the same as the yeomen of the guard, except the ordinary gunners, who were twenty-four, and the officers appointed to look after the magazine, who were called armourers. As to trained bands, there was no possibility of raising any; neither, if the Lieutenancy, either of London or Middlesex, had ordered the drums to beat for the militia, would any of the companies, I believe, have drawn together, whatever risk they had run.

During the lockdown of houses, as I mentioned, some violence was directed at the watchmen. As for soldiers, there weren't any to be found. The few guards the king had at that time, which were nowhere near the number that would be hired later, were scattered, either with the Court in Oxford or stationed in more remote areas of the country, except for a few small detachments who were on duty at the Tower and Whitehall, and even those were quite limited. I'm also not sure if there was any other guard at the Tower besides the warders, as they were called, who stand at the gate in their gowns and caps, similar to the yeomen of the guard, except for the regular gunners, who numbered twenty-four, and the officers responsible for the magazine, known as armourers. As for the trained bands, there was no way to raise any; furthermore, even if the Lieutenancy of London or Middlesex had ordered the drums to beat for the militia, I doubt any of the companies would have gathered, no matter what risks they faced.

This made the watchmen be the less regarded, and perhaps occasioned the greater violence to be used against them. I mention it on this score to observe that the setting watchmen thus to keep the people in was, first of all, not effectual, but that the people broke out, whether by force or by stratagem, even almost as often as they pleased; and, second, that those that did thus break out were generally people infected who, in their desperation, running about from one place to another, valued not whom they injured: and which perhaps, as I have said, might give birth to report that it was natural to the infected people to desire to infect others, which report was really false.

This made the watchmen less respected and may have led to more violence against them. I mention this to point out that having watchmen keep the people in was, first of all, ineffective, as the people escaped—either by force or cleverness—almost as often as they wanted. Second, those who managed to break out were usually infected individuals who, in their desperation, ran from place to place without caring who they harmed. This might have given rise to the false belief that infected people inherently wanted to infect others.

And I know it so well, and in so many several cases, that I could give several relations of good, pious, and religious people who, when they have had the distemper, have been so far from being forward to infect others that they have forbid their own family to come near them, in hopes of their being preserved, and have even died without seeing their nearest relations lest they should be instrumental to give them the distemper, and infect or endanger them. If, then, there were cases wherein the infected people were careless of the injury they did to others, this was certainly one of them, if not the chief, namely, when people who had the distemper had broken out from houses which were so shut up, and having been driven to extremities for provision or for entertainment, had endeavoured to conceal their condition, and have been thereby instrumental involuntarily to infect others who have been ignorant and unwary.

And I know this very well, from many different examples, that I could share stories of good, pious, and religious people who, when they got sick, were so unwilling to spread the illness that they told their own families to keep their distance, hoping to protect them, and even died without seeing their closest relatives to avoid putting them at risk of getting sick. If there were instances where infected people didn't care about the harm they caused others, this was definitely one of them, especially when those who were sick left homes that had been locked down and, driven by desperation for food or social interaction, tried to hide their condition, unknowingly spreading the sickness to others who were unaware and unsuspecting.

This is one of the reasons why I believed then, and do believe still, that the shutting up houses thus by force, and restraining, or rather imprisoning, people in their own houses, as I said above, was of little or no service in the whole. Nay, I am of opinion it was rather hurtful, having forced those desperate people to wander abroad with the plague upon them, who would otherwise have died quietly in their beds.

This is one of the reasons why I believed then, and still believe now, that forcibly closing houses and confining people in their own homes, as I mentioned earlier, was mostly pointless. In fact, I think it was more harmful, as it pushed those desperate individuals to roam the streets with the plague, when they would have otherwise passed away peacefully in their beds.

I remember one citizen who, having thus broken out of his house in Aldersgate Street or thereabout, went along the road to Islington; he attempted to have gone in at the Angel Inn, and after that the White Horse, two inns known still by the same signs, but was refused; after which he came to the Pied Bull, an inn also still continuing the same sign. He asked them for lodging for one night only, pretending to be going into Lincolnshire, and assuring them of his being very sound and free from the infection, which also at that time had not reached much that way.

I remember a man who, after breaking out of his house on Aldersgate Street or nearby, walked down the road to Islington. He tried to enter the Angel Inn and then the White Horse, both of which are still known by those names, but he was turned away. After that, he went to the Pied Bull, which still has the same sign. He asked for a room for just one night, pretending he was heading to Lincolnshire and assuring them that he was completely healthy and free from the infection, which at that time hadn’t spread much in that direction.

They told him they had no lodging that they could spare but one bed up in the garret, and that they could spare that bed for one night, some drovers being expected the next day with cattle; so, if he would accept of that lodging, he might have it, which he did. So a servant was sent up with a candle with him to show him the room. He was very well dressed, and looked like a person not used to lie in a garret; and when he came to the room he fetched a deep sigh, and said to the servant, ‘I have seldom lain in such a lodging as this. ‘However, the servant assuring him again that they had no better, ‘Well,’ says he, ‘I must make shift; this is a dreadful time; but it is but for one night.’ So he sat down upon the bedside, and bade the maid, I think it was, fetch him up a pint of warm ale. Accordingly the servant went for the ale, but some hurry in the house, which perhaps employed her other ways, put it out of her head, and she went up no more to him.

They told him they didn’t have any spare rooms except for one bed in the attic, and they could offer that bed for one night because some drovers were expected the next day with cattle. So, if he was okay with that arrangement, he could take it, which he agreed to. A servant was sent up with a candle to show him the room. He was well dressed and seemed like someone who wasn't used to sleeping in an attic. When he entered the room, he let out a deep sigh and said to the servant, “I’ve rarely slept in a place like this.” However, after the servant reassured him that they had no better options, he replied, “Well, I’ll have to make do; it’s a tough time, but it’s just for one night.” He then sat down on the edge of the bed and asked the maid—if that was who it was—to bring him a pint of warm ale. The servant went to get the ale, but some commotion in the house likely distracted her, and she didn’t return to him.

The next morning, seeing no appearance of the gentleman, somebody in the house asked the servant that had showed him upstairs what was become of him. She started. ‘Alas I,’ says she, ‘I never thought more of him. He bade me carry him some warm ale, but I forgot.’ Upon which, not the maid, but some other person was sent up to see after him, who, coming into the room, found him stark dead and almost cold, stretched out across the bed. His clothes were pulled off, his jaw fallen, his eyes open in a most frightful posture, the rug of the bed being grasped hard in one of his hands, so that it was plain he died soon after the maid left him; and ’tis probable, had she gone up with the ale, she had found him dead in a few minutes after he sat down upon the bed. The alarm was great in the house, as anyone may suppose, they having been free from the distemper till that disaster, which, bringing the infection to the house, spread it immediately to other houses round about it. I do not remember how many died in the house itself, but I think the maid-servant who went up first with him fell presently ill by the fright, and several others; for, whereas there died but two in Islington of the plague the week before, there died seventeen the week after, whereof fourteen were of the plague. This was in the week from the 11th of July to the 18th.

The next morning, when no one had seen the gentleman, someone in the house asked the servant who had taken him upstairs what had happened to him. She was startled. "Oh no," she said, "I never thought about him again. He asked me to bring him some warm ale, but I forgot." After that, someone else was sent up to check on him, and when they entered the room, they found him completely dead and almost cold, lying across the bed. His clothes were removed, his jaw was slack, and his eyes were wide open in a terrifying way, with the bedspread clenched tightly in one of his hands. It was obvious he had died shortly after the maid left him, and it’s likely that if she had gone up with the ale, she would have found him dead just minutes after he sat down on the bed. There was a huge commotion in the house, as you can imagine, since they had escaped the illness until this incident, which brought the infection into the house and quickly spread it to nearby homes. I can’t recall how many people died in the house itself, but I believe the maid who went up with him became ill shortly after from the shock, along with several others; because, while only two people died of the plague in Islington the week before, seventeen died the following week, fourteen of them from the plague. This was during the week from July 11th to July 18th.

There was one shift that some families had, and that not a few, when their houses happened to be infected, and that was this: the families who, in the first breaking-out of the distemper, fled away into the country and had retreats among their friends, generally found some or other of their neighbours or relations to commit the charge of those houses to for the safety of the goods and the like. Some houses were, indeed, entirely locked up, the doors padlocked, the windows and doors having deal boards nailed over them, and only the inspection of them committed to the ordinary watchmen and parish officers; but these were but few.

There was a change that some families experienced, and not just a few, when their homes became infected, and that was this: the families who, at the first outbreak of the illness, fled to the countryside and stayed with friends usually found some neighbors or relatives to take care of their houses to ensure the safety of their belongings and so on. Some houses were completely locked up, with doors padlocked and windows covered with boards, and the regular watchmen and parish officers were responsible for checking on them; but these cases were quite rare.

It was thought that there were not less than 10,000 houses forsaken of the inhabitants in the city and suburbs, including what was in the out-parishes and in Surrey, or the side of the water they called Southwark. This was besides the numbers of lodgers, and of particular persons who were fled out of other families; so that in all it was computed that about 200,000 people were fled and gone. But of this I shall speak again. But I mention it here on this account, namely, that it was a rule with those who had thus two houses in their keeping or care, that if anybody was taken sick in a family, before the master of the family let the examiners or any other officer know of it, he immediately would send all the rest of his family, whether children or servants, as it fell out to be, to such other house which he had so in charge, and then giving notice of the sick person to the examiner, have a nurse or nurses appointed, and have another person to be shut up in the house with them (which many for money would do), so to take charge of the house in case the person should die.

It was believed that there were at least 10,000 abandoned houses in the city and surrounding areas, including those in the out-parishes and in Surrey, or what they called Southwark. This didn't even include the number of lodgers and specific individuals who had fled from other families; overall, it was estimated that around 200,000 people had disappeared. But I will talk more about that later. I mention it here because it was a common practice for those who owned two houses to ensure that if someone got sick in a family, the head of the family would quickly send the rest of the family members, whether they were children or servants, to the other house they owned. Then, without informing the examiners or any officials, they would notify the examiner about the sick person, arrange for a nurse or nurses to be present, and have someone else stay in the house with them (which many would do for payment) to take care of the house in case the sick person died.

This was, in many cases, the saving a whole family, who, if they had been shut up with the sick person, would inevitably have perished. But, on the other hand, this was another of the inconveniences of shutting up houses; for the apprehensions and terror of being shut up made many run away with the rest of the family, who, though it was not publicly known, and they were not quite sick, had yet the distemper upon them; and who, by having an uninterrupted liberty to go about, but being obliged still to conceal their circumstances, or perhaps not knowing it themselves, gave the distemper to others, and spread the infection in a dreadful manner, as I shall explain further hereafter.

This often saved an entire family, who, if they had been isolated with the sick person, would have surely died. But, on the other hand, this was another downside of isolating homes; the fear and anxiety of being cut off made many flee with the rest of their family, who, although it wasn’t publicly known and they weren’t seriously ill, still carried the disease. By having the freedom to move around but needing to hide their situation, or perhaps not even realizing it themselves, they ended up spreading the infection to others in a horrifying way, as I will explain further later.

And here I may be able to make an observation or two of my own, which may be of use hereafter to those into whose hands these may come, if they should ever see the like dreadful visitation. (1) The infection generally came into the houses of the citizens by the means of their servants, whom they were obliged to send up and down the streets for necessaries; that is to say, for food or physic, to bakehouses, brew-houses, shops, &c.; and who going necessarily through the streets into shops, markets, and the like, it was impossible but that they should, one way or other, meet with distempered people, who conveyed the fatal breath into them, and they brought it home to the families to which they belonged. (2) It was a great mistake that such a great city as this had but one pest-house; for had there been, instead of one pest-house—viz., beyond Bunhill Fields, where, at most, they could receive, perhaps, two hundred or three hundred people—I say, had there, instead of that one, been several pest-houses, every one able to contain a thousand people, without lying two in a bed, or two beds in a room; and had every master of a family, as soon as any servant especially had been taken sick in his house, been obliged to send them to the next pest-house, if they were willing, as many were, and had the examiners done the like among the poor people when any had been stricken with the infection; I say, had this been done where the people were willing (not otherwise), and the houses not been shut, I am persuaded, and was all the while of that opinion, that not so many, by several thousands, had died; for it was observed, and I could give several instances within the compass of my own knowledge, where a servant had been taken sick, and the family had either time to send him out or retire from the house and leave the sick person, as I have said above, they had all been preserved; whereas when, upon one or more sickening in a family, the house has been shut up, the whole family have perished, and the bearers been obliged to go in to fetch out the dead bodies, not being able to bring them to the door, and at last none left to do it.

And here I can probably share a few observations that might be helpful later for anyone who comes across this if they ever experience a similar terrible outbreak. (1) The infection typically entered the homes of the citizens through their servants, whom they had to send out around the streets for essentials; that is, for food or medicine, to bakeries, breweries, stores, etc.; and since these servants had to move through the streets into shops, markets, and similar places, it was inevitable that they would encounter infected people, who spread the deadly germs to them, and they would then bring it back to their families. (2) It was a huge mistake that a big city like this had only one pest house; if there had been multiple pest houses, each capable of accommodating a thousand people without overcrowding, instead of just one located beyond Bunhill Fields that could hold maybe two to three hundred people at most—if every head of household, especially when a servant became sick, had been required to send them to the nearest pest house, if they were willing, as many were, and if the inspectors had done the same for the poor when anyone was infected; I believe that if this had been done where people were

(3) This put it out of question to me, that the calamity was spread by infection; that is to say, by some certain steams or fumes, which the physicians call effluvia, by the breath, or by the sweat, or by the stench of the sores of the sick persons, or some other way, perhaps, beyond even the reach of the physicians themselves, which effluvia affected the sound who came within certain distances of the sick, immediately penetrating the vital parts of the said sound persons, putting their blood into an immediate ferment, and agitating their spirits to that degree which it was found they were agitated; and so those newly infected persons communicated it in the same manner to others. And this I shall give some instances of, that cannot but convince those who seriously consider it; and I cannot but with some wonder find some people, now the contagion is over, talk of its being an immediate stroke from Heaven, without the agency of means, having commission to strike this and that particular person, and none other—which I look upon with contempt as the effect of manifest ignorance and enthusiasm; likewise the opinion of others, who talk of infection being carried on by the air only, by carrying with it vast numbers of insects and invisible creatures, who enter into the body with the breath, or even at the pores with the air, and there generate or emit most acute poisons, or poisonous ovae or eggs, which mingle themselves with the blood, and so infect the body: a discourse full of learned simplicity, and manifested to be so by universal experience; but I shall say more to this case in its order.

(3) It was clear to me that the disaster was spread by infection; that is, by certain gases or fumes, which doctors refer to as effluvia, possibly through breath, sweat, or the odor of the sores from sick individuals, or perhaps in ways beyond even the understanding of the doctors themselves. These effluvia affected healthy individuals who came within a certain distance of the sick, immediately penetrating their vital organs, causing their blood to react rapidly and stirring their spirits to such a degree that it was evident in their behavior. Those who became newly infected then spread it to others in the same way. I will provide some examples that should convince anyone who takes the time to think about it; and I can't help but be surprised that some people, now that the contagion is over, claim it was a direct act of God, striking specific individuals without any means, targeting this person and not that one—which I view with disdain as a result of clear ignorance and enthusiasm. Likewise, there are others who believe that infection was solely transmitted through the air, carried by countless insects and invisible creatures that enter the body with each breath or even through the pores, producing or releasing sharp poisons, or poisonous eggs, that mix with the blood and infect the body: a discussion filled with misguided complexity, clearly proven wrong by universal experience; but I will address this further in due time.

I must here take further notice that nothing was more fatal to the inhabitants of this city than the supine negligence of the people themselves, who, during the long notice or warning they had of the visitation, made no provision for it by laying in store of provisions, or of other necessaries, by which they might have lived retired and within their own houses, as I have observed others did, and who were in a great measure preserved by that caution; nor were they, after they were a little hardened to it, so shy of conversing with one another, when actually infected, as they were at first: no, though they knew it.

I need to point out that nothing was more deadly for the people of this city than their own careless behavior. Despite having plenty of warning about the impending disaster, they did nothing to prepare. They didn't stock up on food or other essentials that could have helped them stay safe and isolated in their homes, unlike others who did take those precautions and were mostly able to avoid disaster. Even after they got used to the situation, they weren't as hesitant to talk to each other when they were actually infected, even though they knew the risks.

I acknowledge I was one of those thoughtless ones that had made so little provision that my servants were obliged to go out of doors to buy every trifle by penny and halfpenny, just as before it began, even till my experience showing me the folly, I began to be wiser so late that I had scarce time to store myself sufficient for our common subsistence for a month.

I realize I was one of those careless people who made so little preparation that my staff had to go outside to buy every little thing for a penny or a halfpenny, just like before it all started. Even when my experiences showed me how foolish that was, I only became wiser so late that I barely had time to gather enough supplies for our basic needs for a month.

I had in family only an ancient woman that managed the house, a maid-servant, two apprentices, and myself; and the plague beginning to increase about us, I had many sad thoughts about what course I should take, and how I should act. The many dismal objects which happened everywhere as I went about the streets, had filled my mind with a great deal of horror for fear of the distemper, which was indeed very horrible in itself, and in some more than in others. The swellings, which were generally in the neck or groin, when they grew hard and would not break, grew so painful that it was equal to the most exquisite torture; and some, not able to bear the torment, threw themselves out at windows or shot themselves, or otherwise made themselves away, and I saw several dismal objects of that kind. Others, unable to contain themselves, vented their pain by incessant roarings, and such loud and lamentable cries were to be heard as we walked along the streets that would pierce the very heart to think of, especially when it was to be considered that the same dreadful scourge might be expected every moment to seize upon ourselves.

I only had an old woman who managed the house, a maid, two apprentices, and myself as family. As the plague started to spread around us, I had a lot of haunting thoughts about what I should do and how to act. The many grim sights I encountered in the streets filled my mind with fear of the disease, which was truly terrifying, especially in some cases more than others. The swellings, usually in the neck or groin, became so painful when they hardened and wouldn’t break that it felt like the worst torture; some people, unable to endure the agony, threw themselves out of windows, shot themselves, or found other ways to end their lives, and I witnessed several horrific scenes like that. Others, unable to hold back, expressed their pain through constant wailing, and the loud, heart-wrenching cries we heard as we walked down the streets were enough to pierce your heart, especially when considering that the same terrible plague could strike us at any moment.

I cannot say but that now I began to faint in my resolutions; my heart failed me very much, and sorely I repented of my rashness. When I had been out, and met with such terrible things as these I have talked of, I say I repented my rashness in venturing to abide in town. I wished often that I had not taken upon me to stay, but had gone away with my brother and his family.

I have to admit that I started to doubt my decisions; I felt really discouraged, and I deeply regretted my impulsiveness. After experiencing such horrifying things as I mentioned, I definitely regretted my recklessness in deciding to stay in town. I often wished that I had chosen to leave with my brother and his family instead.

Terrified by those frightful objects, I would retire home sometimes and resolve to go out no more; and perhaps I would keep those resolutions for three or four days, which time I spent in the most serious thankfulness for my preservation and the preservation of my family, and the constant confession of my sins, giving myself up to God every day, and applying to Him with fasting, humiliation, and meditation. Such intervals as I had I employed in reading books and in writing down my memorandums of what occurred to me every day, and out of which afterwards I took most of this work, as it relates to my observations without doors. What I wrote of my private meditations I reserve for private use, and desire it may not be made public on any account whatever.

Scared by those terrifying objects, I would sometimes go home and decide not to go out again; I might stick to that decision for three or four days. During that time, I spent my days feeling deeply grateful for my safety and that of my family, constantly confessing my sins and surrendering myself to God each day, along with fasting, humility, and meditation. Whenever I had the chance, I read books and jotted down my thoughts about what happened each day, from which I later compiled most of this work regarding my observations outside. What I wrote about my personal reflections is for my own use only, and I hope it won't be shared publicly for any reason.

I also wrote other meditations upon divine subjects, such as occurred to me at that time and were profitable to myself, but not fit for any other view, and therefore I say no more of that.

I also wrote other reflections on spiritual topics that came to me at that time and were helpful for myself, but not suitable for any other purpose, so I won't say more about that.

I had a very good friend, a physician, whose name was Heath, whom I frequently visited during this dismal time, and to whose advice I was very much obliged for many things which he directed me to take, by way of preventing the infection when I went out, as he found I frequently did, and to hold in my mouth when I was in the streets. He also came very often to see me, and as he was a good Christian as well as a good physician, his agreeable conversation was a very great support to me in the worst of this terrible time.

I had a really good friend named Heath, who was a doctor. I often visited him during this tough time, and I was very grateful for his advice on various things he recommended to help prevent infection when I went out, which I often did, and to keep in my mouth while I was in the streets. He also came to see me a lot, and since he was both a great doctor and a good Christian, his pleasant conversation was a big comfort to me during the worst of this awful time.

It was now the beginning of August, and the plague grew very violent and terrible in the place where I lived, and Dr Heath coming to visit me, and finding that I ventured so often out in the streets, earnestly persuaded me to lock myself up and my family, and not to suffer any of us to go out of doors; to keep all our windows fast, shutters and curtains close, and never to open them; but first, to make a very strong smoke in the room where the window or door was to be opened, with rozen and pitch, brimstone or gunpowder and the like; and we did this for some time; but as I had not laid in a store of provision for such a retreat, it was impossible that we could keep within doors entirely. However, I attempted, though it was so very late, to do something towards it; and first, as I had convenience both for brewing and baking, I went and bought two sacks of meal, and for several weeks, having an oven, we baked all our own bread; also I bought malt, and brewed as much beer as all the casks I had would hold, and which seemed enough to serve my house for five or six weeks; also I laid in a quantity of salt butter and Cheshire cheese; but I had no flesh-meat, and the plague raged so violently among the butchers and slaughter-houses on the other side of our street, where they are known to dwell in great numbers, that it was not advisable so much as to go over the street among them.

It was now the beginning of August, and the plague was becoming extremely severe and frightening in my area. Dr. Heath visited me and, noticing that I kept going out into the streets, strongly urged me to stay inside with my family and not let anyone go outdoors. He advised us to keep all our windows locked, shutters and curtains drawn, and never open them. Before opening any window or door, we should create a strong smoke in the room using resin, pitch, brimstone, gunpowder, or similar substances. We followed this advice for some time, but since I hadn’t stocked up on supplies for such a lockdown, it was impossible for us to stay inside completely. Still, I tried to prepare, even though it was late. Since I had the means to brew and bake, I went out and bought two sacks of flour, and for several weeks, we baked all our own bread using my oven. I also bought malt and brewed as much beer as my barrels could hold, which seemed enough to last my household for five or six weeks. I stocked up on salt butter and Cheshire cheese, but I had no meat, and the plague was spreading so violently among the butchers and slaughterhouses across the street, where they lived in large numbers, that it wasn’t safe even to cross the street to be near them.

And here I must observe again, that this necessity of going out of our houses to buy provisions was in a great measure the ruin of the whole city, for the people catched the distemper on these occasions one of another, and even the provisions themselves were often tainted; at least I have great reason to believe so; and therefore I cannot say with satisfaction what I know is repeated with great assurance, that the market-people and such as brought provisions to town were never infected. I am certain the butchers of Whitechappel, where the greatest part of the flesh-meat was killed, were dreadfully visited, and that at least to such a degree that few of their shops were kept open, and those that remained of them killed their meat at Mile End and that way, and brought it to market upon horses.

And here I have to point out again that the need to leave our homes to buy food was a major reason for the city's downfall. People caught the illness from one another during these trips, and even the food itself was often contaminated; at least, I have strong reasons to believe that. So, I can't say with confidence what I know people repeat with great certainty, that the market vendors and those who brought food into the city were never infected. I know for sure that the butchers in Whitechapel, where most of the meat was processed, were severely affected, to the point that few of their shops remained open. Those that did stayed operational killed their meat at Mile End and brought it to the market on horses.

However, the poor people could not lay up provisions, and there was a necessity that they must go to market to buy, and others to send servants or their children; and as this was a necessity which renewed itself daily, it brought abundance of unsound people to the markets, and a great many that went thither sound brought death home with them.

However, the poor couldn’t stock up on supplies, so they had to go to the market to buy what they needed, and others would send their servants or children. Since this daily need kept repeating, it brought a lot of sick people to the markets, and many healthy individuals who went there ended up bringing death back home with them.

It is true people used all possible precaution. When any one bought a joint of meat in the market they would not take it off the butcher’s hand, but took it off the hooks themselves. On the other hand, the butcher would not touch the money, but have it put into a pot full of vinegar, which he kept for that purpose. The buyer carried always small money to make up any odd sum, that they might take no change. They carried bottles of scents and perfumes in their hands, and all the means that could be used were used, but then the poor could not do even these things, and they went at all hazards.

It's true that people took every possible precaution. When someone bought a piece of meat at the market, they wouldn't take it directly from the butcher but would remove it from the hooks themselves. On the flip side, the butcher wouldn't handle the money; instead, he'd have it dropped into a pot filled with vinegar that he kept for that purpose. Buyers always carried small change to cover any odd cents, so they wouldn't receive any change back. They held bottles of scents and perfumes in their hands, and they did everything they could to be careful, but the poor couldn't even do that, and they faced all risks.

Innumerable dismal stories we heard every day on this very account. Sometimes a man or woman dropped down dead in the very markets, for many people that had the plague upon them knew nothing of it till the inward gangrene had affected their vitals, and they died in a few moments. This caused that many died frequently in that manner in the streets suddenly, without any warning; others perhaps had time to go to the next bulk or stall, or to any door-porch, and just sit down and die, as I have said before.

We heard countless grim stories every day because of this. Sometimes a man or woman would collapse and die right in the markets, as many people infected with the plague were completely unaware of it until internal gangrene had set in, and they died within moments. This led to many people dying unexpectedly in the streets, without any warning; others might have had just enough time to reach the nearest stall or doorway to sit down and pass away, as I mentioned earlier.

These objects were so frequent in the streets that when the plague came to be very raging on one side, there was scarce any passing by the streets but that several dead bodies would be lying here and there upon the ground. On the other hand, it is observable that though at first the people would stop as they went along and call to the neighbours to come out on such an occasion, yet afterward no notice was taken of them; but that if at any time we found a corpse lying, go across the way and not come near it; or, if in a narrow lane or passage, go back again and seek some other way to go on the business we were upon; and in those cases the corpse was always left till the officers had notice to come and take them away, or till night, when the bearers attending the dead-cart would take them up and carry them away. Nor did those undaunted creatures who performed these offices fail to search their pockets, and sometimes strip off their clothes if they were well dressed, as sometimes they were, and carry off what they could get.

These objects were so common on the streets that when the plague was really severe on one side, you could barely walk down the street without seeing several dead bodies lying around. At first, people would stop and call their neighbors to come out when they saw these situations, but eventually, they stopped paying attention. If we saw a corpse lying around, we would just cross to the other side of the street and avoid it, or if it was in a narrow alley, we would turn back and find another way to continue our business. In those cases, the body was always left there until the authorities were notified to come and take it away, or until night when the bearers for the dead cart would pick them up and carry them off. Those brave individuals who did this work didn’t hesitate to search the pockets or even strip the bodies of their clothes if they were dressed nicely and take away whatever they could find.

But to return to the markets. The butchers took that care that if any person died in the market they had the officers always at hand to take them up upon hand-barrows and carry them to the next churchyard; and this was so frequent that such were not entered in the weekly bill, ‘Found dead in the streets or fields’, as is the case now, but they went into the general articles of the great distemper.

But let's get back to the markets. The butchers made sure that if anyone died in the market, they had the officers ready to lift them onto handcarts and carry them to the nearest churchyard. This happened so often that these incidents weren’t included in the weekly report of “Found dead in the streets or fields,” like they are today. Instead, they were listed under the general cases of the widespread illness.

But now the fury of the distemper increased to such a degree that even the markets were but very thinly furnished with provisions or frequented with buyers compared to what they were before; and the Lord Mayor caused the country people who brought provisions to be stopped in the streets leading into the town, and to sit down there with their goods, where they sold what they brought, and went immediately away; and this encouraged the country people greatly-to do so, for they sold their provisions at the very entrances into the town, and even in the fields, as particularly in the fields beyond Whitechappel, in Spittlefields; also in St George’s Fields in Southwark, in Bunhill Fields, and in a great field called Wood’s Close, near Islington. Thither the Lord Mayor, aldermen, and magistrates sent their officers and servants to buy for their families, themselves keeping within doors as much as possible, and the like did many other people; and after this method was taken the country people came with great cheerfulness, and brought provisions of all sorts, and very seldom got any harm, which, I suppose, added also to that report of their being miraculously preserved.

But now the severity of the sickness increased to such an extent that the markets were barely stocked with food or had very few customers compared to before; and the Lord Mayor ordered that the country folks bringing food be stopped on the streets leading into the town, where they could sit down with their goods, selling what they brought and leaving right afterward. This really encouraged the country people because they sold their provisions right at the entrances to the town, and even in the fields, especially in the fields beyond Whitechapel, in Spitalfields; also in St. George’s Fields in Southwark, in Bunhill Fields, and in a large area called Wood’s Close, near Islington. There, the Lord Mayor, aldermen, and magistrates sent their officers and servants to buy for their families, as they themselves tried to stay indoors as much as possible, and many other people did the same. After this approach was taken, the country folks came with great enthusiasm, bringing all sorts of provisions, and they rarely faced any harm, which, I suppose, contributed to the belief that they were miraculously protected.

As for my little family, having thus, as I have said, laid in a store of bread, butter, cheese, and beer, I took my friend and physician’s advice, and locked myself up, and my family, and resolved to suffer the hardship of living a few months without flesh-meat, rather than to purchase it at the hazard of our lives.

As for my little family, having stocked up on bread, butter, cheese, and beer, I took the advice of my friend and doctor, locked myself and my family in, and decided to endure the difficulty of living for a few months without meat rather than risk our lives to buy it.

But though I confined my family, I could not prevail upon my unsatisfied curiosity to stay within entirely myself; and though I generally came frighted and terrified home, yet I could not restrain; only that indeed I did not do it so frequently as at first.

But even though I kept my family close, I couldn't stop my restless curiosity from getting the better of me; and while I often came home scared and shaken, I still couldn't hold back; I just didn't do it as often as I did at first.

I had some little obligations, indeed, upon me to go to my brother’s house, which was in Coleman Street parish and which he had left to my care, and I went at first every day, but afterwards only once or twice a week.

I had a few small obligations to visit my brother's house, which was in Coleman Street parish and which he had entrusted to me, and I initially went every day, but later I only went once or twice a week.

In these walks I had many dismal scenes before my eyes, as particularly of persons falling dead in the streets, terrible shrieks and screechings of women, who, in their agonies, would throw open their chamber windows and cry out in a dismal, surprising manner. It is impossible to describe the variety of postures in which the passions of the poor people would express themselves.

In these walks, I witnessed many grim sights, especially people collapsing dead in the streets, and the horrible screams of women who, in their pain, would fling open their windows and cry out in a haunting, shocking way. It's impossible to capture the range of poses in which the emotions of these unfortunate people would manifest.

Passing through Tokenhouse Yard, in Lothbury, of a sudden a casement violently opened just over my head, and a woman gave three frightful screeches, and then cried, ‘Oh! death, death, death!’ in a most inimitable tone, and which struck me with horror and a chillness in my very blood. There was nobody to be seen in the whole street, neither did any other window open, for people had no curiosity now in any case, nor could anybody help one another, so I went on to pass into Bell Alley.

As I was walking through Tokenhouse Yard in Lothbury, suddenly a window swung open right above me, and a woman let out three terrifying screams, then shouted, ‘Oh! death, death, death!’ in a way that was so unique it filled me with horror and sent a chill through my veins. There was no one else in the street, and no other windows opened, as people had lost all curiosity and couldn’t help each other anymore, so I continued on to Bell Alley.

Just in Bell Alley, on the right hand of the passage, there was a more terrible cry than that, though it was not so directed out at the window; but the whole family was in a terrible fright, and I could hear women and children run screaming about the rooms like distracted, when a garret-window opened and somebody from a window on the other side the alley called and asked, ‘What is the matter?’ upon which, from the first window, it was answered, ‘Oh Lord, my old master has hanged himself!’ The other asked again, ‘Is he quite dead?’ and the first answered, ‘Ay, ay, quite dead; quite dead and cold!’ This person was a merchant and a deputy alderman, and very rich. I care not to mention the name, though I knew his name too, but that would be an hardship to the family, which is now flourishing again.

Just in Bell Alley, on the right side of the passage, there was a much worse scream than that, although it wasn’t directed out the window; the whole family was in a complete panic, and I could hear women and children rushing around the rooms screaming like they were out of their minds when a window in the attic opened, and someone from a window on the other side of the alley shouted, “What’s happening?” To which, from the first window, it was answered, “Oh God, my old master has hanged himself!” The other person asked again, “Is he completely dead?” and the first replied, “Yeah, yeah, completely dead; completely dead and cold!” This person was a merchant and a deputy alderman, and very wealthy. I don’t care to mention his name, even though I know it, but that would be a burden to the family, which is now thriving again.

But this is but one; it is scarce credible what dreadful cases happened in particular families every day. People in the rage of the distemper, or in the torment of their swellings, which was indeed intolerable, running out of their own government, raving and distracted, and oftentimes laying violent hands upon themselves, throwing themselves out at their windows, shooting themselves &c.; mothers murdering their own children in their lunacy, some dying of mere grief as a passion, some of mere fright and surprise without any infection at all, others frighted into idiotism and foolish distractions, some into despair and lunacy, others into melancholy madness.

But this is just one example; it's hard to believe the terrible things that happened in individual families every day. People, overwhelmed by the illness or the unbearable pain from their swellings, lost control, often raving and acting irrationally. Many harmed themselves, jumping out of windows or even committing suicide. Mothers, in their madness, killed their own children. Some died from sheer grief, while others perished from shock and fear without any infection at all. Some were frightened into a state of idiocy and foolishness, others into despair and madness, and still others into deep melancholy.

The pain of the swelling was in particular very violent, and to some intolerable; the physicians and surgeons may be said to have tortured many poor creatures even to death. The swellings in some grew hard, and they applied violent drawing-plaisters or poultices to break them, and if these did not do they cut and scarified them in a terrible manner. In some those swellings were made hard partly by the force of the distemper and partly by their being too violently drawn, and were so hard that no instrument could cut them, and then they burnt them with caustics, so that many died raving mad with the torment, and some in the very operation. In these distresses, some, for want of help to hold them down in their beds, or to look to them, laid hands upon themselves as above. Some broke out into the streets, perhaps naked, and would run directly down to the river if they were not stopped by the watchman or other officers, and plunge themselves into the water wherever they found it.

The pain from the swelling was especially intense, and for some, unbearable; doctors and surgeons are said to have tortured many unfortunate souls to the point of death. The swellings in some cases became hard, and they used harsh drawing plasters or poultices to try to break them. When those didn't work, they cut and scarified them in a horrific way. In some instances, the swellings became hard due to the severity of the illness and also from being pulled too forcefully, becoming so tough that no instrument could cut through them. Then they burned them with caustics, causing many to die in agony, some even during the procedure. In these distressing situations, some, lacking anyone to hold them down in their beds or care for them, resorted to self-harm as mentioned. Some ran out into the streets, possibly naked, and would rush directly to the river if they weren't stopped by guards or other officials, plunging themselves into the water wherever they could find it.

It often pierced my very soul to hear the groans and cries of those who were thus tormented, but of the two this was counted the most promising particular in the whole infection, for if these swellings could be brought to a head, and to break and run, or, as the surgeons call it, to digest, the patient generally recovered; whereas those who, like the gentlewoman’s daughter, were struck with death at the beginning, and had the tokens come out upon them, often went about indifferent easy till a little before they died, and some till the moment they dropped down, as in apoplexies and epilepsies is often the case. Such would be taken suddenly very sick, and would run to a bench or bulk, or any convenient place that offered itself, or to their own houses if possible, as I mentioned before, and there sit down, grow faint, and die. This kind of dying was much the same as it was with those who die of common mortifications, who die swooning, and, as it were, go away in a dream. Such as died thus had very little notice of their being infected at all till the gangrene was spread through their whole body; nor could physicians themselves know certainly how it was with them till they opened their breasts or other parts of their body and saw the tokens.

Hearing the groans and cries of those who suffered often deeply affected me, but among these cases, this one was seen as the most hopeful of the entire infection. If these swellings could be brought to a head and break open, or, as the surgeons referred to it, "digest," the patient usually recovered. In contrast, those like the gentlewoman’s daughter who showed signs of impending death early on often seemed fine until shortly before they passed away, and some even until the very moment they collapsed, similar to what happens in strokes and seizures. They would suddenly feel very ill and rush to a bench, a ledge, or any suitable place nearby, or if possible, to their own homes, as I mentioned earlier, where they would sit down, feel faint, and die. This type of death resembled that of people who die from ordinary infections, who faint and seem to depart in a sort of dream. Those who died this way had very little warning of their infection until the gangrene had spread throughout their entire body; even doctors couldn’t be certain of their condition until they examined their bodies and observed the signs.

We had at this time a great many frightful stories told us of nurses and watchmen who looked after the dying people; that is to say, hired nurses who attended infected people, using them barbarously, starving them, smothering them, or by other wicked means hastening their end, that is to say, murdering of them; and watchmen, being set to guard houses that were shut up when there has been but one person left, and perhaps that one lying sick, that they have broke in and murdered that body, and immediately thrown them out into the dead-cart! And so they have gone scarce cold to the grave.

At that time, we heard a lot of terrifying stories about nurses and watchmen who cared for dying people. These were hired nurses who looked after infected patients, treating them brutally, starving them, smothering them, or using other cruel methods to speed up their deaths—essentially murdering them. There were also watchmen assigned to guard houses that were quarantined, where only one person might be left, often sick. They would break in and kill that person and then quickly toss the body into the dead-cart! They barely had time to grow cold before being taken to the grave.

I cannot say but that some such murders were committed, and I think two were sent to prison for it, but died before they could be tried; and I have heard that three others, at several times, were excused for murders of that kind; but I must say I believe nothing of its being so common a crime as some have since been pleased to say, nor did it seem to be so rational where the people were brought so low as not to be able to help themselves, for such seldom recovered, and there was no temptation to commit a murder, at least none equal to the fact, where they were sure persons would die in so short a time, and could not live.

I can't deny that some murders like that happened, and I think two people were sent to prison for it but died before they could stand trial; I've also heard that three others were let go for similar murders at different times. However, I really don't believe it was as common a crime as some people have claimed, nor did it seem logical considering people were in such dire situations that they couldn't help themselves. Those who were that low often didn't recover, and there wasn't really any incentive to commit murder, at least not one that matched the reality, since they were sure the victims would die in such a short time and couldn't survive.

That there were a great many robberies and wicked practices committed even in this dreadful time I do not deny. The power of avarice was so strong in some that they would run any hazard to steal and to plunder; and particularly in houses where all the families or inhabitants have been dead and carried out, they would break in at all hazards, and without regard to the danger of infection, take even the clothes off the dead bodies and the bed-clothes from others where they lay dead.

That there were a lot of robberies and terrible acts happening even during this awful time is undeniable. The greed was so strong in some people that they would take any risk to steal and plunder; especially in homes where all the families or residents had died and been taken away, they would break in no matter the risk and without any concern for the danger of infection, even taking clothes off dead bodies and the bed linens from others who lay dead.

This, I suppose, must be the case of a family in Houndsditch, where a man and his daughter, the rest of the family being, as I suppose, carried away before by the dead-cart, were found stark naked, one in one chamber and one in another, lying dead on the floor, and the clothes of the beds, from whence ’tis supposed they were rolled off by thieves, stolen and carried quite away.

This must be the case of a family in Houndsditch, where a man and his daughter, the rest of the family presumably taken away earlier by the dead-cart, were found completely naked, one person in one room and the other in another, lying dead on the floor. The bedding, from which they are thought to have been rolled off by thieves, was stolen and taken away completely.

It is indeed to be observed that the women were in all this calamity the most rash, fearless, and desperate creatures, and as there were vast numbers that went about as nurses to tend those that were sick, they committed a great many petty thieveries in the houses where they were employed; and some of them were publicly whipped for it, when perhaps they ought rather to have been hanged for examples, for numbers of houses were robbed on these occasions, till at length the parish officers were sent to recommend nurses to the sick, and always took an account whom it was they sent, so as that they might call them to account if the house had been abused where they were placed.

It’s worth noting that the women were, during this whole disaster, the most reckless, fearless, and desperate individuals. Many of them worked as nurses to care for the sick, and in doing so, they committed a lot of minor thefts in the homes where they were employed. Some were publicly whipped for it, when they probably should have been hanged as examples, since a number of homes were robbed during this time. Eventually, the parish officers were sent to recommend nurses to the sick and always took note of whom they sent, so they could hold them accountable if the household was mistreated while they were there.

But these robberies extended chiefly to wearing-clothes, linen, and what rings or money they could come at when the person died who was under their care, but not to a general plunder of the houses; and I could give you an account of one of these nurses, who, several years after, being on her deathbed, confessed with the utmost horror the robberies she had committed at the time of her being a nurse, and by which she had enriched herself to a great degree. But as for murders, I do not find that there was ever any proof of the facts in the manner as it has been reported, except as above.

But these robberies mostly involved stealing clothing, linens, and any rings or money they could get their hands on when the person they were taking care of died, rather than a full-on looting of the houses. I could tell you about one of these nurses who, years later, while on her deathbed, confessed with great horror about the thefts she had committed while being a nurse, which had significantly enriched her. However, regarding murders, I haven't found any evidence supporting the claims that have been made, aside from what I've mentioned above.

They did tell me, indeed, of a nurse in one place that laid a wet cloth upon the face of a dying patient whom she tended, and so put an end to his life, who was just expiring before; and another that smothered a young woman she was looking to when she was in a fainting fit, and would have come to herself; some that killed them by giving them one thing, some another, and some starved them by giving them nothing at all. But these stories had two marks of suspicion that always attended them, which caused me always to slight them and to look on them as mere stories that people continually frighted one another with. First, that wherever it was that we heard it, they always placed the scene at the farther end of the town, opposite or most remote from where you were to hear it. If you heard it in Whitechappel, it had happened at St Giles’s, or at Westminster, or Holborn, or that end of the town. If you heard of it at that end of the town, then it was done in Whitechappel, or the Minories, or about Cripplegate parish. If you heard of it in the city, why, then it happened in Southwark; and if you heard of it in Southwark, then it was done in the city, and the like.

They really did tell me about a nurse in one place who put a wet cloth on the face of a dying patient she was tending, and ended his life, who was just about to die anyway; and another nurse who smothered a young woman she was caring for when she was in a faint and could have come around. Some killed patients by giving them one thing, others another, and some let them starve by giving them nothing at all. But these stories always had two suspicious traits that made me dismiss them and view them as just tales that people told to scare each other. First, no matter where we heard it, they always placed the scene at the farthest part of town, the opposite or most distant from where we were hearing it. If you heard it in Whitechapel, it happened in St Giles’s, or Westminster, or Holborn, or the other end of the town. If you heard it at that end, then it was happening in Whitechapel, or the Minories, or around Cripplegate parish. If you heard about it in the city, then it happened in Southwark; and if you heard about it in Southwark, then it was in the city, and so on.

In the next place, of what part soever you heard the story, the particulars were always the same, especially that of laying a wet double cloth on a dying man’s face, and that of smothering a young gentlewoman; so that it was apparent, at least to my judgement, that there was more of tale than of truth in those things.

In any case, no matter where you heard the story, the details were always the same, especially the part about putting a wet double cloth on a dying man's face and the one about smothering a young woman. So, it seemed to me that there was more fiction than fact in those accounts.

However, I cannot say but it had some effect upon the people, and particularly that, as I said before, they grew more cautious whom they took into their houses, and whom they trusted their lives with, and had them always recommended if they could; and where they could not find such, for they were not very plenty, they applied to the parish officers.

However, I can't say that it didn't have some impact on the people, and especially that, as I mentioned before, they became more careful about who they let into their homes and whom they trusted with their lives. They always looked for recommendations if they could; and when they couldn’t find such references, since they were not very common, they turned to the parish officers.

But here again the misery of that time lay upon the poor who, being infected, had neither food or physic, neither physician or apothecary to assist them, or nurse to attend them. Many of those died calling for help, and even for sustenance, out at their windows in a most miserable and deplorable manner; but it must be added that whenever the cases of such persons or families were represented to my Lord Mayor they always were relieved.

But once again, the suffering of that time fell on the poor who, being sick, had no food or medicine, no doctor or pharmacist to help them, or caregiver to attend to them. Many of them died crying for help and even for food from their windows in a terribly sad way; however, it should be noted that whenever the situations of such individuals or families were brought to my Lord Mayor's attention, they were always given assistance.

It is true, in some houses where the people were not very poor, yet where they had sent perhaps their wives and children away, and if they had any servants they had been dismissed;—I say it is true that to save the expenses, many such as these shut themselves in, and not having help, died alone.

It’s true that in some homes where people weren’t very poor, but had sent their wives and children away, and had perhaps dismissed any servants; I mean, it’s a fact that to cut costs, many of them isolated themselves and, without help, died alone.

A neighbour and acquaintance of mine, having some money owing to him from a shopkeeper in Whitecross Street or thereabouts, sent his apprentice, a youth about eighteen years of age, to endeavour to get the money. He came to the door, and finding it shut, knocked pretty hard; and, as he thought, heard somebody answer within, but was not sure, so he waited, and after some stay knocked again, and then a third time, when he heard somebody coming downstairs.

A neighbor and acquaintance of mine, who was owed some money by a shopkeeper in Whitecross Street or nearby, sent his apprentice, a young man about eighteen years old, to try to collect the money. He arrived at the door, and finding it closed, knocked fairly hard; he thought he heard someone respond from inside, but he wasn't sure, so he waited. After a while, he knocked again, and then a third time, when he heard someone coming down the stairs.

At length the man of the house came to the door; he had on his breeches or drawers, and a yellow flannel waistcoat, no stockings, a pair of slipped-shoes, a white cap on his head, and, as the young man said, ‘death in his face’.

At last, the head of the household reached the door; he was wearing his pants or boxers, a yellow flannel vest, no socks, a pair of slip-on shoes, a white cap on his head, and, as the young man put it, ‘death on his face’.

When he opened the door, says he, ‘What do you disturb me thus for?’ The boy, though a little surprised, replied, ‘I come from such a one, and my master sent me for the money which he says you know of.’ ‘Very well, child,’ returns the living ghost; ‘call as you go by at Cripplegate Church, and bid them ring the bell’; and with these words shut the door again, and went up again, and died the same day; nay, perhaps the same hour. This the young man told me himself, and I have reason to believe it. This was while the plague was not come to a height. I think it was in June, towards the latter end of the month; it must be before the dead-carts came about, and while they used the ceremony of ringing the bell for the dead, which was over for certain, in that parish at least, before the month of July, for by the 25th of July there died 550 and upwards in a week, and then they could no more bury in form, rich or poor.

When he opened the door, he said, "Why are you bothering me like this?" The boy, a bit surprised, replied, "I come from someone, and my master sent me for the money that he says you know about." "Alright, kid," the living ghost responded, "stop by Cripplegate Church and ask them to ring the bell." With that, he shut the door again, went back upstairs, and died that same day, maybe even that same hour. The young man told me this himself, and I have good reason to believe it. This was when the plague hadn't reached its peak yet. I think it was in June, towards the end of the month; it had to be before the dead carts started rolling around, and while they still had the ceremony of ringing the bell for the dead, which had definitely stopped in that parish by July. By July 25th, over 550 people died in a week, and after that, they couldn't bury anyone properly, whether they were rich or poor.

I have mentioned above that notwithstanding this dreadful calamity, yet the numbers of thieves were abroad upon all occasions, where they had found any prey, and that these were generally women. It was one morning about eleven O’clock, I had walked out to my brother’s house in Coleman Street parish, as I often did, to see that all was safe.

I mentioned earlier that despite this terrible disaster, there were still thieves out and about at all times, usually targeting women. One morning around eleven o'clock, I went out to my brother's house in Coleman Street parish, as I often did, to make sure everything was okay.

My brother’s house had a little court before it, and a brick wall and a gate in it, and within that several warehouses where his goods of several sorts lay. It happened that in one of these warehouses were several packs of women’s high-crowned hats, which came out of the country and were, as I suppose, for exportation: whither, I know not.

My brother's house had a small yard in front of it, along with a brick wall and a gate. Inside that area were several storage buildings where he kept various goods. One of these storage buildings happened to hold several packs of women's high-crowned hats, which came from the countryside and were, I assume, meant for export; to where, I don't know.

I was surprised that when I came near my brother’s door, which was in a place they called Swan Alley, I met three or four women with high-crowned hats on their heads; and, as I remembered afterwards, one, if not more, had some hats likewise in their hands; but as I did not see them come out at my brother’s door, and not knowing that my brother had any such goods in his warehouse, I did not offer to say anything to them, but went across the way to shun meeting them, as was usual to do at that time, for fear of the plague. But when I came nearer to the gate I met another woman with more hats come out of the gate. ‘What business, mistress,’ said I, ‘have you had there?’ ‘There are more people there,’ said she; ‘I have had no more business there than they.’ I was hasty to get to the gate then, and said no more to her, by which means she got away. But just as I came to the gate, I saw two more coming across the yard to come out with hats also on their heads and under their arms, at which I threw the gate to behind me, which having a spring lock fastened itself; and turning to the women, ‘Forsooth,’ said I, ‘what are you doing here?’ and seized upon the hats, and took them from them. One of them, who, I confess, did not look like a thief—‘Indeed,’ says she, ‘we are wrong, but we were told they were goods that had no owner. Be pleased to take them again; and look yonder, there are more such customers as we.’ She cried and looked pitifully, so I took the hats from her and opened the gate, and bade them be gone, for I pitied the women indeed; but when I looked towards the warehouse, as she directed, there were six or seven more, all women, fitting themselves with hats as unconcerned and quiet as if they had been at a hatter’s shop buying for their money.

I was surprised that when I got close to my brother’s door, which was on a street they called Swan Alley, I ran into three or four women wearing high-crowned hats. I also remembered that one, if not more, was holding some hats in her hands too; but since I didn’t see them come out of my brother’s door and didn’t know he had any hats in his warehouse, I didn’t say anything to them and crossed the street to avoid running into them, as was common back then because of the fear of the plague. But when I got closer to the gate, I met another woman with even more hats coming out. “What’s your business there, ma’am?” I asked. “There are more people there,” she replied, “I have no more business there than they do.” I was eager to get to the gate and didn’t say anything else to her, which allowed her to slip away. Just as I reached the gate, I saw two more women coming across the yard with hats on their heads and under their arms, so I quickly shut the gate behind me, which locked itself with a spring. Turning to the women, I said, “What are you doing here?” and grabbed the hats from them. One of them, who honestly didn’t look like a thief, said, “We admit we’re wrong, but we were told these were goods with no owner. Please take them back; look over there, there are more like us.” She cried and looked so pitiful that I took the hats from her and opened the gate, telling them to leave because I truly felt sorry for the women. But when I looked towards the warehouse, as she pointed out, there were six or seven more women casually fitting themselves with hats as if they were shopping at a hat store.

I was surprised, not at the sight of so many thieves only, but at the circumstances I was in; being now to thrust myself in among so many people, who for some weeks had been so shy of myself that if I met anybody in the street I would cross the way from them.

I was surprised, not just by seeing so many thieves, but by my situation; I was now about to insert myself among so many people who had been avoiding me for weeks. If I encountered anyone on the street, I would cross to the other side to avoid them.

They were equally surprised, though on another account. They all told me they were neighbours, that they had heard anyone might take them, that they were nobody’s goods, and the like. I talked big to them at first, went back to the gate and took out the key, so that they were all my prisoners, threatened to lock them all into the warehouse, and go and fetch my Lord Mayor’s officers for them.

They were just as surprised, but for a different reason. They all told me they were neighbors, that anyone could take them, that they didn't belong to anyone, and similar things. I acted confidently at first, went back to the gate, and took out the key, so they were all my prisoners. I threatened to lock them all in the warehouse and go get the officers from the Mayor for them.

They begged heartily, protested they found the gate open, and the warehouse door open; and that it had no doubt been broken open by some who expected to find goods of greater value: which indeed was reasonable to believe, because the lock was broke, and a padlock that hung to the door on the outside also loose, and an abundance of the hats carried away.

They pleaded fervently, insisting they saw the gate open and the warehouse door ajar; that it had probably been pried open by others expecting to find valuable goods. This was certainly reasonable to think, since the lock was broken, and a padlock hanging on the outside of the door was also loose, along with a bunch of hats missing.

At length I considered that this was not a time to be cruel and rigorous; and besides that, it would necessarily oblige me to go much about, to have several people come to me, and I go to several whose circumstances of health I knew nothing of; and that even at this time the plague was so high as that there died 4000 a week; so that in showing my resentment, or even in seeking justice for my brother’s goods, I might lose my own life; so I contented myself with taking the names and places where some of them lived, who were really inhabitants in the neighbourhood, and threatening that my brother should call them to an account for it when he returned to his habitation.

Eventually, I realized this wasn’t the right time to be harsh and unforgiving; besides, it would mean I had to go out a lot, have several people come to me, and visit others whose health situations I was completely unaware of. At that moment, the plague was so severe that there were 4,000 deaths a week. So, by expressing my anger or even trying to seek justice for my brother’s belongings, I could risk my own life. Therefore, I settled for taking down the names and addresses of some of the people who actually lived in the neighborhood and threatened that my brother would hold them accountable when he returned home.

Then I talked a little upon another foot with them, and asked them how they could do such things as these in a time of such general calamity, and, as it were, in the face of God’s most dreadful judgements, when the plague was at their very doors, and, it may be, in their very houses, and they did not know but that the dead-cart might stop at their doors in a few hours to carry them to their graves.

Then I chatted a bit more with them and asked how they could do such things during such a widespread disaster, essentially in the face of God’s terrible judgments, when the plague was right at their doorstep, and possibly even inside their homes. They didn’t know if the dead-cart might show up at their door in just a few hours to take them to their graves.

I could not perceive that my discourse made much impression upon them all that while, till it happened that there came two men of the neighbourhood, hearing of the disturbance, and knowing my brother, for they had been both dependents upon his family, and they came to my assistance. These being, as I said, neighbours, presently knew three of the women and told me who they were and where they lived; and it seems they had given me a true account of themselves before.

I couldn't see that what I was saying had much of an impact on any of them until two local men showed up. They heard about the commotion and recognized my brother since they had both worked for his family. They came to help me. Being neighbors, they quickly identified three of the women and informed me who they were and where they lived. It turned out they had given me accurate information about themselves earlier.

This brings these two men to a further remembrance. The name of one was John Hayward, who was at that time undersexton of the parish of St Stephen, Coleman Street. By undersexton was understood at that time gravedigger and bearer of the dead. This man carried, or assisted to carry, all the dead to their graves which were buried in that large parish, and who were carried in form; and after that form of burying was stopped, went with the dead-cart and the bell to fetch the dead bodies from the houses where they lay, and fetched many of them out of the chambers and houses; for the parish was, and is still, remarkable particularly, above all the parishes in London, for a great number of alleys and thoroughfares, very long, into which no carts could come, and where they were obliged to go and fetch the bodies a very long way; which alleys now remain to witness it, such as White’s Alley, Cross Key Court, Swan Alley, Bell Alley, White Horse Alley, and many more. Here they went with a kind of hand-barrow and laid the dead bodies on it, and carried them out to the carts; which work he performed and never had the distemper at all, but lived about twenty years after it, and was sexton of the parish to the time of his death. His wife at the same time was a nurse to infected people, and tended many that died in the parish, being for her honesty recommended by the parish officers; yet she never was infected neither.

This reminds these two men of something else. One of them was John Hayward, who was the undersexton of St. Stephen's parish on Coleman Street at that time. Back then, "undersexton" meant gravedigger and bearer of the dead. This man carried, or helped carry, all the bodies to their graves in this large parish, following the formal burial process. When that formal way of burying was discontinued, he used a cart and a bell to collect the dead bodies from the homes where they had died and even removed many from upper floors and houses. The parish is still notable, more than any other parish in London, for its many long alleys and streets where carts couldn’t fit, which meant they had to carry the bodies over long distances. These alleys still exist today, like White’s Alley, Cross Key Court, Swan Alley, Bell Alley, White Horse Alley, and many others. They used a type of hand-barrow to carry the bodies out to the carts, a job he did without ever getting sick himself, living about twenty more years until he died and remaining the parish sexton until the end. His wife was a nurse for infected people during that time, caring for many who died in the parish, having been recommended for her integrity by the parish officials; yet she never got infected either.

He never used any preservative against the infection, other than holding garlic and rue in his mouth, and smoking tobacco. This I also had from his own mouth. And his wife’s remedy was washing her head in vinegar and sprinkling her head-clothes so with vinegar as to keep them always moist, and if the smell of any of those she waited on was more than ordinary offensive, she snuffed vinegar up her nose and sprinkled vinegar upon her head-clothes, and held a handkerchief wetted with vinegar to her mouth.

He didn’t use any medicines to prevent infection, other than keeping garlic and rue in his mouth and smoking tobacco. I heard this directly from him. His wife’s remedy was to wash her hair with vinegar and wet her head coverings with vinegar to keep them damp. If someone she was caring for had an unusually strong odor, she would inhale vinegar through her nose and sprinkle it on her head coverings, holding a vinegar-soaked handkerchief to her mouth.

It must be confessed that though the plague was chiefly among the poor, yet were the poor the most venturous and fearless of it, and went about their employment with a sort of brutal courage; I must call it so, for it was founded neither on religion nor prudence; scarce did they use any caution, but ran into any business which they could get employment in, though it was the most hazardous. Such was that of tending the sick, watching houses shut up, carrying infected persons to the pest-house, and, which was still worse, carrying the dead away to their graves.

I have to admit that even though the plague mostly affected the poor, they were also the most adventurous and fearless in facing it. They went about their work with a kind of brutal courage; I have to call it that because it was based neither on faith nor common sense. They hardly took any precautions and jumped into any job they could find, no matter how dangerous it was. This included caring for the sick, watching over houses that had been quarantined, transporting infected people to the pest-house, and even worse, taking the dead to their graves.

It was under this John Hayward’s care, and within his bounds, that the story of the piper, with which people have made themselves so merry, happened, and he assured me that it was true. It is said that it was a blind piper; but, as John told me, the fellow was not blind, but an ignorant, weak, poor man, and usually walked his rounds about ten o’clock at night and went piping along from door to door, and the people usually took him in at public-houses where they knew him, and would give him drink and victuals, and sometimes farthings; and he in return would pipe and sing and talk simply, which diverted the people; and thus he lived. It was but a very bad time for this diversion while things were as I have told, yet the poor fellow went about as usual, but was almost starved; and when anybody asked how he did he would answer, the dead cart had not taken him yet, but that they had promised to call for him next week.

It was under John Hayward’s care and within his territory that the story of the piper, which has amused so many, took place, and he assured me it was true. People say he was a blind piper; however, as John told me, the guy wasn’t blind, but rather an uneducated, weak, poor man who usually made his rounds around ten o’clock at night, piping from door to door. The locals often welcomed him into public houses where they recognized him, offering him drinks, food, and sometimes pennies. In return, he would play music, sing, and chat simply, entertaining the crowd, and that’s how he survived. It was a difficult time for such entertainment while things were as I’ve described, yet the poor guy continued his routine but was nearly starving. When anyone asked how he was doing, he would reply that the dead cart hadn’t picked him up yet, but they promised to come for him next week.

It happened one night that this poor fellow, whether somebody had given him too much drink or no—John Hayward said he had not drink in his house, but that they had given him a little more victuals than ordinary at a public-house in Coleman Street—and the poor fellow, having not usually had a bellyful for perhaps not a good while, was laid all along upon the top of a bulk or stall, and fast asleep, at a door in the street near London Wall, towards Cripplegate, and that upon the same bulk or stall the people of some house, in the alley of which the house was a corner, hearing a bell which they always rang before the cart came, had laid a body really dead of the plague just by him, thinking, too, that this poor fellow had been a dead body, as the other was, and laid there by some of the neighbours.

One night, this unfortunate man, whether he had too much to drink or not—John Hayward said he didn’t have any alcohol at his place, but that they had given him a bit more food than usual at a pub on Coleman Street—and the poor guy, who probably hadn't had enough to eat for a while, ended up stretched out on top of a cart or stall, fast asleep, at a door on the street near London Wall, close to Cripplegate. Meanwhile, on the same cart or stall, the residents of a nearby house in the alley—where it was a corner house—hearing a bell they always rang before the cart arrived, had placed a really dead body from the plague right next to him, mistakenly thinking that this poor guy was another dead body, just like the other one, and had been left there by some neighbors.

Accordingly, when John Hayward with his bell and the cart came along, finding two dead bodies lie upon the stall, they took them up with the instrument they used and threw them into the cart, and, all this while the piper slept soundly.

Accordingly, when John Hayward showed up with his bell and the cart, he found two dead bodies lying on the stall. They picked them up with the tool they had and tossed them into the cart, all the while the piper slept soundly.

From hence they passed along and took in other dead bodies, till, as honest John Hayward told me, they almost buried him alive in the cart; yet all this while he slept soundly. At length the cart came to the place where the bodies were to be thrown into the ground, which, as I do remember, was at Mount Mill; and as the cart usually stopped some time before they were ready to shoot out the melancholy load they had in it, as soon as the cart stopped the fellow awaked and struggled a little to get his head out from among the dead bodies, when, raising himself up in the cart, he called out, ‘Hey! where am I?’ This frighted the fellow that attended about the work; but after some pause John Hayward, recovering himself, said, ‘Lord, bless us! There’s somebody in the cart not quite dead!’ So another called to him and said, ‘Who are you?’ The fellow answered, ‘I am the poor piper. Where am I?’ ‘Where are you?’ says Hayward. ‘Why, you are in the dead-cart, and we are going to bury you.’ ‘But I an’t dead though, am I?’ says the piper, which made them laugh a little though, as John said, they were heartily frighted at first; so they helped the poor fellow down, and he went about his business.

They moved on and picked up more dead bodies until, as honest John Hayward told me, they almost buried him alive in the cart; yet through all this, he slept peacefully. Eventually, the cart arrived at the place where the bodies were to be buried, which I remember was at Mount Mill. The cart usually stopped for a while before they were ready to dump the sad load it was carrying. As soon as the cart stopped, the man woke up and struggled a bit to get his head out from among the dead bodies. Sitting up in the cart, he shouted, 'Hey! Where am I?' This scared the guy who was attending to the task. But after a moment, John Hayward, regaining his composure, said, 'Good grief! There's someone in the cart still alive!' Then another person called to him and asked, 'Who are you?' The man replied, 'I'm the poor piper. Where am I?' 'Where are you?' Hayward said. 'Well, you're in the dead-cart, and we’re going to bury you.' 'But I'm not dead, am I?' said the piper, which made them chuckle a little, although John admitted they were quite scared at first. They helped the poor guy down, and he went on with his day.

I know the story goes he set up his pipes in the cart and frighted the bearers and others so that they ran away; but John Hayward did not tell the story so, nor say anything of his piping at all; but that he was a poor piper, and that he was carried away as above I am fully satisfied of the truth of.

I know the story says he set up his pipes in the cart and scared the bearers and others so much that they ran away; but John Hayward didn’t tell it that way, nor did he mention anything about him playing his pipes at all; rather, he said that he was a bad piper, and that he was taken away as I’ve described. I’m completely convinced that this is the truth.

It is to be noted here that the dead-carts in the city were not confined to particular parishes, but one cart went through several parishes, according as the number of dead presented; nor were they tied to carry the dead to their respective parishes, but many of the dead taken up in the city were carried to the burying-ground in the out-parts for want of room.

It’s important to point out that the dead carts in the city weren't limited to specific parishes; one cart would go through multiple parishes based on the number of bodies collected. They weren't obligated to take the dead back to their own parishes either; many of the bodies collected in the city were taken to the burial grounds on the outskirts due to lack of space.

I have already mentioned the surprise that this judgement was at first among the people. I must be allowed to give some of my observations on the more serious and religious part. Surely never city, at least of this bulk and magnitude, was taken in a condition so perfectly unprepared for such a dreadful visitation, whether I am to speak of the civil preparations or religious. They were, indeed, as if they had had no warning, no expectation, no apprehensions, and consequently the least provision imaginable was made for it in a public way. For example, the Lord Mayor and sheriffs had made no provision as magistrates for the regulations which were to be observed. They had gone into no measures for relief of the poor. The citizens had no public magazines or storehouses for corn or meal for the subsistence of the poor, which if they had provided themselves, as in such cases is done abroad, many miserable families who were now reduced to the utmost distress would have been relieved, and that in a better manner than now could be done.

I’ve already mentioned how surprising this judgment was at first to the people. I’d like to share some of my thoughts on the more serious and religious aspects. Never before has a city of this size and importance been caught so completely unprepared for such a terrible disaster, whether we’re talking about civil or religious preparations. It was as if they had received no warning, no expectations, and no concerns, and as a result, there was almost no public provision made for it. For instance, the Lord Mayor and the sheriffs hadn’t made any plans as magistrates for the necessary regulations. They hadn’t taken any steps to help the poor. The citizens didn’t have any public stores or warehouses for grain or food to support the needy, which, if they had, as is often done in other places, would have saved many families now in extreme distress, and they would have been helped in a much better way than what is possible now.

The stock of the city’s money I can say but little to. The Chamber of London was said to be exceedingly rich, and it may be concluded that they were so, by the vast of money issued from thence in the rebuilding the public edifices after the fire of London, and in building new works, such as, for the first part, the Guildhall, Blackwell Hall, part of Leadenhall, half the Exchange, the Session House, the Compter, the prisons of Ludgate, Newgate, &c., several of the wharfs and stairs and landing-places on the river; all which were either burned down or damaged by the great fire of London, the next year after the plague; and of the second sort, the Monument, Fleet Ditch with its bridges, and the Hospital of Bethlem or Bedlam, &c. But possibly the managers of the city’s credit at that time made more conscience of breaking in upon the orphan’s money to show charity to the distressed citizens than the managers in the following years did to beautify the city and re-edify the buildings; though, in the first case, the losers would have thought their fortunes better bestowed, and the public faith of the city have been less subjected to scandal and reproach.

I can’t say much about the city’s finances. The Chamber of London was said to be very wealthy, and you can conclude they were by the massive amount of money put into rebuilding public buildings after the Great Fire of London and constructing new projects, like the Guildhall, Blackwell Hall, parts of Leadenhall, half of the Exchange, the Session House, the Compter, and the prisons of Ludgate and Newgate, among others. All of these were either destroyed or damaged in the Great Fire of London, which happened the year after the plague. New projects included the Monument, Fleet Ditch with its bridges, and the Bethlem Hospital (or Bedlam), etc. However, it’s possible that the people managing the city’s funds at that time were more careful about using orphan’s money to support the struggling citizens than those in later years were about improving the city and rebuilding. In the first scenario, those who lost money would have felt that their contributions were better spent, and the city’s public trust would have faced less scandal and criticism.

It must be acknowledged that the absent citizens, who, though they were fled for safety into the country, were yet greatly interested in the welfare of those whom they left behind, forgot not to contribute liberally to the relief of the poor, and large sums were also collected among trading towns in the remotest parts of England; and, as I have heard also, the nobility and the gentry in all parts of England took the deplorable condition of the city into their consideration, and sent up large sums of money in charity to the Lord Mayor and magistrates for the relief of the poor. The king also, as I was told, ordered a thousand pounds a week to be distributed in four parts: one quarter to the city and liberty of Westminster; one quarter or part among the inhabitants of the Southwark side of the water; one quarter to the liberty and parts within of the city, exclusive of the city within the walls; and one-fourth part to the suburbs in the county of Middlesex, and the east and north parts of the city. But this latter I only speak of as a report.

It should be noted that the absent citizens, who had fled to the countryside for safety, were still very concerned about the well-being of those they left behind. They didn’t forget to donate generously to help the poor, and significant amounts were also raised in trading towns across the farthest parts of England. Additionally, I’ve heard that the nobility and gentry from all over England took the terrible situation of the city into account and sent large sums of money in charity to the Lord Mayor and magistrates to assist the needy. The king also reportedly ordered a distribution of a thousand pounds a week, divided into four parts: one portion for the city and the liberty of Westminster; another for the residents of the Southwark side of the river; a third for the liberty and areas inside the city, excluding the area within the walls; and the final part for the suburbs in Middlesex county, as well as the east and north parts of the city. However, I mention this last part only as something I’ve heard.

Certain it is, the greatest part of the poor or families who formerly lived by their labour, or by retail trade, lived now on charity; and had there not been prodigious sums of money given by charitable, well-minded Christians for the support of such, the city could never have subsisted. There were, no question, accounts kept of their charity, and of the just distribution of it by the magistrates. But as such multitudes of those very officers died through whose hands it was distributed, and also that, as I have been told, most of the accounts of those things were lost in the great fire which happened in the very next year, and which burnt even the chamberlain’s office and many of their papers, so I could never come at the particular account, which I used great endeavours to have seen.

It's clear that most of the poor or families who previously relied on their work or small businesses were now dependent on charity. If it hadn't been for the huge amounts of money donated by kind-hearted Christians to support them, the city wouldn't have been able to survive. There were definitely records kept of their charitable contributions and how it was fairly distributed by the officials. However, since so many of those officials died through whom the aid was distributed, and because, as I've been told, most of those records were lost in the major fire that occurred the very next year—which even destroyed the chamberlain’s office and many of their documents—I was never able to get my hands on the specific accounts, despite my best efforts to see them.

It may, however, be a direction in case of the approach of a like visitation, which God keep the city from;—I say, it may be of use to observe that by the care of the Lord Mayor and aldermen at that time in distributing weekly great sums of money for relief of the poor, a multitude of people who would otherwise have perished, were relieved, and their lives preserved. And here let me enter into a brief state of the case of the poor at that time, and what way apprehended from them, from whence may be judged hereafter what may be expected if the like distress should come upon the city.

It could be useful to consider this if a similar disaster were to approach, which we hope the city is spared from. At that time, the Lord Mayor and aldermen took great care to distribute large sums of money each week to help the poor, saving many lives that would have otherwise been lost. Now, I want to briefly explain the situation of the poor at that time and how they were viewed so that we can anticipate what might happen if the city faced similar hardship in the future.

At the beginning of the plague, when there was now no more hope but that the whole city would be visited; when, as I have said, all that had friends or estates in the country retired with their families; and when, indeed, one would have thought the very city itself was running out of the gates, and that there would be nobody left behind; you may be sure from that hour all trade, except such as related to immediate subsistence, was, as it were, at a full stop.

At the start of the plague, when it seemed like there was no hope left for the entire city; when, as I mentioned, everyone with friends or property in the countryside fled with their families; and when it truly felt like even the city itself was abandoning its gates, leaving no one behind; you can be sure that from that moment on, all commerce, except for what was necessary for survival, came to a complete halt.

This is so lively a case, and contains in it so much of the real condition of the people, that I think I cannot be too particular in it, and therefore I descend to the several arrangements or classes of people who fell into immediate distress upon this occasion. For example:

This is such a vivid situation, and it reveals so much about the actual condition of the people, that I think I need to be very specific about it. So, I will go into the various groups or classes of people who experienced immediate hardship as a result of this incident. For example:

1. All master-workmen in manufactures, especially such as belonged to ornament and the less necessary parts of the people’s dress, clothes, and furniture for houses, such as riband-weavers and other weavers, gold and silver lace makers, and gold and silver wire drawers, sempstresses, milliners, shoemakers, hatmakers, and glovemakers; also upholsterers, joiners, cabinet-makers, looking-glass makers, and innumerable trades which depend upon such as these;—I say, the master-workmen in such stopped their work, dismissed their journeymen and workmen, and all their dependents.

1. All skilled artisans in manufacturing, especially those involved in decorative and less essential elements of people's clothing, garments, and home furnishings, like ribbon weavers and other weavers, gold and silver lace makers, and gold and silver wire workers, seamstresses, milliners, shoemakers, hat makers, and glove makers; as well as upholsterers, carpenters, cabinet makers, mirror makers, and countless other trades that rely on these crafts;—I mean, the skilled artisans in these fields stopped their work, let go of their apprentices and workers, and all their dependents.

2. As merchandising was at a full stop, for very few ships ventured to come up the river and none at all went out, so all the extraordinary officers of the customs, likewise the watermen, carmen, porters, and all the poor whose labour depended upon the merchants, were at once dismissed and put out of business.

2. With merchandising completely halted, very few ships came up the river, and none went out at all. As a result, all the customs officers, along with the watermen, cart drivers, porters, and all the workers whose jobs relied on the merchants, were suddenly let go and out of work.

3. All the tradesmen usually employed in building or repairing of houses were at a full stop, for the people were far from wanting to build houses when so many thousand houses were at once stripped of their inhabitants; so that this one article turned all the ordinary workmen of that kind out of business, such as bricklayers, masons, carpenters, joiners, plasterers, painters, glaziers, smiths, plumbers, and all the labourers depending on such.

3. All the tradespeople usually involved in building or fixing houses were completely idle, as people had no desire to construct new homes when so many thousands of houses had just been emptied of their residents. This single issue left all the typical workers in that field without jobs, including bricklayers, masons, carpenters, joiners, plasterers, painters, glaziers, blacksmiths, plumbers, and all the laborers who relied on them.

4. As navigation was at a stop, our ships neither coming in or going out as before, so the seamen were all out of employment, and many of them in the last and lowest degree of distress; and with the seamen were all the several tradesmen and workmen belonging to and depending upon the building and fitting out of ships, such as ship-carpenters, caulkers, ropemakers, dry coopers, sailmakers, anchorsmiths, and other smiths; blockmakers, carvers, gunsmiths, ship-chandlers, ship-carvers, and the like. The masters of those perhaps might live upon their substance, but the traders were universally at a stop, and consequently all their workmen discharged. Add to these that the river was in a manner without boats, and all or most part of the watermen, lightermen, boat-builders, and lighter-builders in like manner idle and laid by.

4. Since navigation had come to a halt, our ships weren't coming in or going out like before, so the seamen were all out of work, and many of them were in dire distress. Along with the seamen, all the various tradesmen and workers who relied on shipbuilding and outfitting were also affected, such as ship carpenters, caulkers, rope makers, dry coopers, sail makers, anchor smiths, and other smiths; block makers, carvers, gunsmiths, ship chandlers, ship carvers, and so on. The masters of those trades might be able to live off their savings, but the traders were completely at a standstill, leading to all their workers being let go. On top of this, the river was basically devoid of boats, leaving most of the watermen, lightermen, boat builders, and lighter builders similarly idle and inactive.

5. All families retrenched their living as much as possible, as well those that fled as those that stayed; so that an innumerable multitude of footmen, serving-men, shopkeepers, journeymen, merchants’ bookkeepers, and such sort of people, and especially poor maid-servants, were turned off, and left friendless and helpless, without employment and without habitation, and this was really a dismal article.

5. All families cut back on their living expenses as much as they could, whether they had fled or stayed behind; as a result, countless footmen, servants, shopkeepers, tradesmen, merchants’ clerks, and especially poor maids were let go, left friendless and helpless, without jobs and homes, and this was truly a bleak situation.

I might be more particular as to this part, but it may suffice to mention in general, all trades being stopped, employment ceased: the labour, and by that the bread, of the poor were cut off; and at first indeed the cries of the poor were most lamentable to hear, though by the distribution of charity their misery that way was greatly abated. Many indeed fled into the counties, but thousands of them having stayed in London till nothing but desperation sent them away, death overtook them on the road, and they served for no better than the messengers of death; indeed, others carrying the infection along with them, spread it very unhappily into the remotest parts of the kingdom.

I might be a bit more specific about this part, but it’s worth mentioning that when all businesses shut down, everyone lost their jobs: the work and, consequently, the livelihood of the poor disappeared. At first, the cries of the poor were heartbreaking to hear, although their suffering was significantly lessened by the distribution of charity. Many actually fled to the countryside, but thousands stayed in London until despair forced them to leave, and death caught up with them on the way, turning them into nothing more than harbingers of death. Others, unfortunately, carried the infection with them, spreading it very unfortunately to the most distant areas of the country.

Many of these were the miserable objects of despair which I have mentioned before, and were removed by the destruction which followed. These might be said to perish not by the infection itself but by the consequence of it; indeed, namely, by hunger and distress and the want of all things: being without lodging, without money, without friends, without means to get their bread, or without anyone to give it them; for many of them were without what we call legal settlements, and so could not claim of the parishes, and all the support they had was by application to the magistrates for relief, which relief was (to give the magistrates their due) carefully and cheerfully administered as they found it necessary, and those that stayed behind never felt the want and distress of that kind which they felt who went away in the manner above noted.

Many of these were the wretched people I mentioned before, and they were removed by the destruction that followed. It could be said that they didn’t perish from the infection itself, but from its consequences; that is, from hunger, suffering, and lack of everything: being without shelter, without money, without friends, without ways to earn their living, or without anyone to give it to them; because many of them didn’t have what we call legal residency, and couldn’t claim support from the parishes. The only help they received was through applications to the magistrates for assistance, which, to give the magistrates credit, was provided carefully and willingly as they deemed necessary. Those who remained never experienced the kind of need and hardship that those who left faced.

Let any one who is acquainted with what multitudes of people get their daily bread in this city by their labour, whether artificers or mere workmen—I say, let any man consider what must be the miserable condition of this town if, on a sudden, they should be all turned out of employment, that labour should cease, and wages for work be no more.

Let anyone who knows how many people in this city earn their daily bread through their labor, whether they're skilled tradespeople or just regular workers—let any person think about how terrible the situation would be if, all of a sudden, they were all let go from their jobs, if work stopped, and if there were no more wages for their labor.

This was the case with us at that time; and had not the sums of money contributed in charity by well-disposed people of every kind, as well abroad as at home, been prodigiously great, it had not been in the power of the Lord Mayor and sheriffs to have kept the public peace. Nor were they without apprehensions, as it was, that desperation should push the people upon tumults, and cause them to rifle the houses of rich men and plunder the markets of provisions; in which case the country people, who brought provisions very freely and boldly to town, would have been terrified from coming any more, and the town would have sunk under an unavoidable famine.

This was the situation for us back then; and if the generous donations made by kind-hearted people, both locally and abroad, hadn't been incredibly large, the Lord Mayor and the sheriffs wouldn't have been able to maintain public order. They were also worried that desperation might lead the people to riot and raid the homes of the wealthy and loot the food markets; in that case, the farmers, who regularly brought supplies into the city, would have been too scared to continue, and the city would have faced an inevitable famine.

But the prudence of my Lord Mayor and the Court of Aldermen within the city, and of the justices of peace in the out-parts, was such, and they were supported with money from all parts so well, that the poor people were kept quiet, and their wants everywhere relieved, as far as was possible to be done.

But the wisdom of my Lord Mayor and the Court of Aldermen in the city, as well as the justices of peace in the outskirts, was impressive, and they received funding from all sources so effectively that the less fortunate were kept calm, and their needs were addressed everywhere, as much as possible.

Two things besides this contributed to prevent the mob doing any mischief. One was, that really the rich themselves had not laid up stores of provisions in their houses as indeed they ought to have done, and which if they had been wise enough to have done, and locked themselves entirely up, as some few did, they had perhaps escaped the disease better. But as it appeared they had not, so the mob had no notion of finding stores of provisions there if they had broken in as it is plain they were sometimes very near doing, and which, if they had, they had finished the ruin of the whole city, for there were no regular troops to have withstood them, nor could the trained bands have been brought together to defend the city, no men being to be found to bear arms.

Two things helped prevent the mob from causing any trouble. One was that the wealthy hadn’t actually stocked up on supplies in their homes like they should have. If they had been smart enough to do that and shut themselves in completely, like a few did, they might have avoided the disease better. But since they hadn’t, the mob didn’t think they would find any supplies if they broke in, which they were very close to doing at times. If they had, it would have completely destroyed the city, since there were no regular troops to stop them, and the local militia couldn’t be gathered to defend the city because there weren’t enough men willing to fight.

But the vigilance of the Lord Mayor and such magistrates as could be had (for some, even of the aldermen, were dead, and some absent) prevented this; and they did it by the most kind and gentle methods they could think of, as particularly by relieving the most desperate with money, and putting others into business, and particularly that employment of watching houses that were infected and shut up. And as the number of these were very great (for it was said there was at one time ten thousand houses shut up, and every house had two watchmen to guard it, viz., one by night and the other by day), this gave opportunity to employ a very great number of poor men at a time.

But the watchfulness of the Lord Mayor and the available magistrates (since some aldermen had died and others were missing) stopped this; and they achieved it through the most kind and gentle methods they could think of, especially by giving money to the most desperate and helping others find jobs, particularly the role of watching over houses that were infected and closed. Since the number of these houses was very large (it was reported that at one point there were ten thousand houses shut up, with each house having two watchmen, one for the night and one for the day), this created an opportunity to employ a significant number of poor men at once.

The women and servants that were turned off from their places were likewise employed as nurses to tend the sick in all places, and this took off a very great number of them.

The women and workers who were let go from their jobs were also used as nurses to care for the sick in various locations, which significantly reduced their number.

And, which though a melancholy article in itself, yet was a deliverance in its kind: namely, the plague, which raged in a dreadful manner from the middle of August to the middle of October, carried off in that time thirty or forty thousand of these very people which, had they been left, would certainly have been an insufferable burden by their poverty; that is to say, the whole city could not have supported the expense of them, or have provided food for them; and they would in time have been even driven to the necessity of plundering either the city itself or the country adjacent, to have subsisted themselves, which would first or last have put the whole nation, as well as the city, into the utmost terror and confusion.

And while it was a sad situation in itself, it was also a relief in a way: specifically, the plague, which spread violently from mid-August to mid-October, took the lives of about thirty to forty thousand people. If they had survived, they would undoubtedly have been an unbearable burden due to their poverty; the entire city wouldn’t have been able to afford their care or provide them with food. Eventually, they might have resorted to robbing either the city or nearby areas just to survive, which would have ultimately thrown the entire nation, as well as the city, into extreme fear and chaos.

It was observable, then, that this calamity of the people made them very humble; for now for about nine weeks together there died near a thousand a day, one day with another, even by the account of the weekly bills, which yet, I have reason to be assured, never gave a full account, by many thousands; the confusion being such, and the carts working in the dark when they carried the dead, that in some places no account at all was kept, but they worked on, the clerks and sextons not attending for weeks together, and not knowing what number they carried. This account is verified by the following bills of mortality:—

It became clear that this disaster humbled the people; for nearly nine weeks, around a thousand people died each day on average, according to the weekly reports, although I have good reason to believe that these reports didn't reflect the full extent of the deaths, by many thousands. The chaos was so great, and the carts were working at night to transport the dead, that in some areas, no record was kept at all; the clerks and sextons did not attend for weeks and lost track of how many bodies they carried. This information is confirmed by the following mortality reports:—

     -                        Of all of the
     -                        Diseases.      Plague
     From August   8    to August 15          5319          3880
     ”     ”      15         ”    22          5568          4237
     ”     ”      22         ”    29          7496          6102
     ”     ”      29 to September  5          8252          6988
     ”  September  5         ”    12          7690          6544
     ”     ”      12         ”    19          8297          7165
     ”     ”      19         ”    26          6460          5533
     ”     ”      26 to October    3          5720          4979
     ”   October   3         ”    10          5068          4327
     -                                       ——-         ——-
     -                                      59,870        49,705
     -                        Of all the
     -                        Diseases.      Plague
     From August 8 to August 15          5319          3880
     ”     ”      15         ”    22          5568          4237
     ”     ”      22         ”    29          7496          6102
     ”     ”      29 to September  5          8252          6988
     ”  September  5         ”    12          7690          6544
     ”     ”      12         ”    19          8297          7165
     ”     ”      19         ”    26          6460          5533
     ”     ”      26 to October    3          5720          4979
     ”   October   3         ”    10          5068          4327
     -                                       ——-         ——-
     -                                      59,870        49,705

So that the gross of the people were carried off in these two months; for, as the whole number which was brought in to die of the plague was but 68,590, here is 50,000 of them, within a trifle, in two months; I say 50,000, because, as there wants 295 in the number above, so there wants two days of two months in the account of time.

So, during these two months, a large number of people were taken away; in fact, the total that succumbed to the plague was just 68,590, and here we have about 50,000 of them in no time at all within those two months. I mention 50,000 because there are 295 missing from the total above, and there are also two days missing from the count of two months.

Now when I say that the parish officers did not give in a full account, or were not to be depended upon for their account, let any one but consider how men could be exact in such a time of dreadful distress, and when many of them were taken sick themselves and perhaps died in the very time when their accounts were to be given in; I mean the parish clerks, besides inferior officers; for though these poor men ventured at all hazards, yet they were far from being exempt from the common calamity, especially if it be true that the parish of Stepney had, within the year, 116 sextons, gravediggers, and their assistants; that is to say, bearers, bellmen, and drivers of carts for carrying off the dead bodies.

Now, when I say that the parish officials didn't provide a complete account or couldn't be relied on for their reports, just think about how anyone could be precise during such a time of terrible hardship, especially when many of them themselves fell ill and perhaps died right when their reports were due. I'm talking about the parish clerks and other lower-level officials; even though these poor individuals put themselves at risk, they weren’t immune to the widespread tragedy, particularly if it's true that the parish of Stepney lost 116 sextons, gravediggers, and their assistants over the past year—meaning bearers, bellmen, and cart drivers responsible for carrying away the deceased.

Indeed the work was not of a nature to allow them leisure to take an exact tale of the dead bodies, which were all huddled together in the dark into a pit; which pit or trench no man could come nigh but at the utmost peril. I observed often that in the parishes of Aldgate and Cripplegate, Whitechappel and Stepney, there were five, six, seven, and eight hundred in a week in the bills; whereas if we may believe the opinion of those that lived in the city all the time as well as I, there died sometimes 2000 a week in those parishes; and I saw it under the hand of one that made as strict an examination into that part as he could, that there really died an hundred thousand people of the plague in that one year whereas in the bills, the articles of the plague, it was but 68,590.

The work was so demanding that they didn’t have the time to accurately count the dead bodies, which were all piled together in a dark pit; no one could get close without risking their life. I frequently noticed that in the parishes of Aldgate, Cripplegate, Whitechapel, and Stepney, the weekly death tolls were reported to be five, six, seven, or eight hundred. However, if you believe those who lived in the city during that time, there were sometimes up to 2,000 deaths a week in those parishes. I also saw the work of someone who thoroughly examined that situation and found that over one hundred thousand people died from the plague in that single year, while the official reports stated only 68,590.

If I may be allowed to give my opinion, by what I saw with my eyes and heard from other people that were eye-witnesses, I do verily believe the same, viz., that there died at least 100,000 of the plague only, besides other distempers and besides those which died in the fields and highways and secret Places out of the compass of the communication, as it was called, and who were not put down in the bills though they really belonged to the body of the inhabitants. It was known to us all that abundance of poor despairing creatures who had the distemper upon them, and were grown stupid or melancholy by their misery, as many were, wandered away into the fields and Woods, and into secret uncouth places almost anywhere, to creep into a bush or hedge and die.

If I can share my thoughts based on what I witnessed and what others who saw it confirmed, I truly believe that at least 100,000 people died just from the plague, not counting other illnesses or those who died in fields, on the roads, or in hidden places outside the communication network. These people weren't included in the official counts, even though they were part of the community. We all knew that many poor, hopeless individuals suffering from the illness, who had become numb or depressed because of their pain, wandered off into fields and woods or secluded, strange spots anywhere to find a bush or hedge to crawl into and die.

The inhabitants of the villages adjacent would, in pity, carry them food and set it at a distance, that they might fetch it, if they were able; and sometimes they were not able, and the next time they went they should find the poor wretches lie dead and the food untouched. The number of these miserable objects were many, and I know so many that perished thus, and so exactly where, that I believe I could go to the very place and dig their bones up still; for the country people would go and dig a hole at a distance from them, and then with long poles, and hooks at the end of them, drag the bodies into these pits, and then throw the earth in from as far as they could cast it, to cover them, taking notice how the wind blew, and so coming on that side which the seamen call to windward, that the scent of the bodies might blow from them; and thus great numbers went out of the world who were never known, or any account of them taken, as well within the bills of mortality as without.

The people in the nearby villages would, out of compassion, bring them food and leave it at a distance so they could pick it up if they were able. Sometimes they weren't able to, and the next time someone checked, they would find those poor souls dead with the food untouched. There were many of these unfortunate beings, and I know of so many who died this way and exactly where it happened that I believe I could go to those exact spots and dig up their bones still. The local people would dig a hole away from them and then use long poles with hooks at the end to pull the bodies into these pits. They would throw dirt from as far as they could to cover them, taking care to note which way the wind was blowing, positioning themselves on the side the sailors call upwind, so the smell of the bodies wouldn’t reach them. Thus, many departed from this world without anyone ever knowing or keeping track of them, both in the official death records and otherwise.

This, indeed, I had in the main only from the relation of others, for I seldom walked into the fields, except towards Bethnal Green and Hackney, or as hereafter. But when I did walk, I always saw a great many poor wanderers at a distance; but I could know little of their cases, for whether it were in the street or in the fields, if we had seen anybody coming, it was a general method to walk away; yet I believe the account is exactly true.

This, in fact, I mostly heard from others because I rarely ventured into the fields, except towards Bethnal Green and Hackney or as mentioned later. But when I did go for a walk, I often saw a lot of poor wanderers in the distance; however, I knew little about their situations. Whether in the street or in the fields, if we spotted someone approaching, we would typically walk away. Still, I believe the account is completely accurate.

As this puts me upon mentioning my walking the streets and fields, I cannot omit taking notice what a desolate place the city was at that time. The great street I lived in (which is known to be one of the broadest of all the streets of London, I mean of the suburbs as well as the liberties) all the side where the butchers lived, especially without the bars, was more like a green field than a paved street, and the people generally went in the middle with the horses and carts. It is true that the farthest end towards Whitechappel Church was not all paved, but even the part that was paved was full of grass also; but this need not seem strange, since the great streets within the city, such as Leadenhall Street, Bishopsgate Street, Cornhill, and even the Exchange itself, had grass growing in them in several places; neither cart or coach were seen in the streets from morning to evening, except some country carts to bring roots and beans, or peas, hay, and straw, to the market, and those but very few compared to what was usual. As for coaches, they were scarce used but to carry sick people to the pest-house, and to other hospitals, and some few to carry physicians to such places as they thought fit to venture to visit; for really coaches were dangerous things, and people did not care to venture into them, because they did not know who might have been carried in them last, and sick, infected people were, as I have said, ordinarily carried in them to the pest-houses, and sometimes people expired in them as they went along.

As I talk about my walks through the streets and fields, I have to point out how desolate the city was back then. The large street I lived on (known to be one of the widest in all of London, including both the suburbs and the liberties) had areas where the butchers lived, especially outside the bars, that felt more like a green field than a paved street. People usually walked in the middle with the horses and carts. It’s true that the far end toward Whitechapel Church wasn’t completely paved, but even the paved part had plenty of grass growing; this isn’t surprising since the major streets in the city, like Leadenhall Street, Bishopsgate Street, Cornhill, and even the Exchange itself, had grass in several spots. There were no carts or coaches in the streets from morning to night, except for a few country carts bringing in roots, beans, peas, hay, and straw to the market, and those were very few compared to what was normal. Coaches were rarely used except to transport sick people to the pest-house and other hospitals, and sometimes to take a few doctors to places they thought it was safe to visit because, honestly, coaches were risky, and people didn’t want to use them since they didn’t know who had been in them last, as sick and infected individuals were often taken to the pest-houses in them, and sometimes people even died in them on the way.

It is true, when the infection came to such a height as I have now mentioned, there were very few physicians which cared to stir abroad to sick houses, and very many of the most eminent of the faculty were dead, as well as the surgeons also; for now it was indeed a dismal time, and for about a month together, not taking any notice of the bills of mortality, I believe there did not die less than 1500 or 1700 a day, one day with another.

It’s true that when the infection reached the level I just mentioned, very few doctors wanted to go out to see sick people, and many of the leading physicians were dead, as were the surgeons. It was really a grim time, and for about a month, not counting the death toll reports, I believe at least 1500 or 1700 people died each day, one day after another.

One of the worst days we had in the whole time, as I thought, was in the beginning of September, when, indeed, good people began to think that God was resolved to make a full end of the people in this miserable city. This was at that time when the plague was fully come into the eastern parishes. The parish of Aldgate, if I may give my opinion, buried above a thousand a week for two weeks, though the bills did not say so many;—but it surrounded me at so dismal a rate that there was not a house in twenty uninfected in the Minories, in Houndsditch, and in those parts of Aldgate parish about the Butcher Row and the alleys over against me. I say, in those places death reigned in every corner. Whitechappel parish was in the same condition, and though much less than the parish I lived in, yet buried near 600 a week by the bills, and in my opinion near twice as many. Whole families, and indeed whole streets of families, were swept away together; insomuch that it was frequent for neighbours to call to the bellman to go to such-and-such houses and fetch out the people, for that they were all dead.

One of the worst days we had during that whole time, as I thought, was early September, when good people really started to believe that God was determined to wipe out everyone in this miserable city. This was when the plague had fully entered the eastern parishes. The parish of Aldgate, in my opinion, buried over a thousand people a week for two weeks, even though the official reports didn’t say that many; but it surrounded me at such a dismal rate that there wasn’t a single house in twenty uninfected in the Minories, Houndsditch, and the parts of Aldgate parish around Butcher Row and the alleys across from me. I say, in those areas, death reigned in every corner. Whitechapel parish was in the same situation, and although it was much smaller than the parish I lived in, it buried nearly 600 people a week according to the reports, and I believe it was close to twice that number. Entire families, and indeed whole streets of families, were wiped out all at once; it became common for neighbors to call to the bellman to go to certain houses and take out the people, since they were all dead.

And, indeed, the work of removing the dead bodies by carts was now grown so very odious and dangerous that it was complained of that the bearers did not take care to clear such houses where all the inhabitants were dead, but that sometimes the bodies lay several days unburied, till the neighbouring families were offended with the stench, and consequently infected; and this neglect of the officers was such that the churchwardens and constables were summoned to look after it, and even the justices of the Hamlets were obliged to venture their lives among them to quicken and encourage them, for innumerable of the bearers died of the distemper, infected by the bodies they were obliged to come so near. And had it not been that the number of poor people who wanted employment and wanted bread (as I have said before) was so great that necessity drove them to undertake anything and venture anything, they would never have found people to be employed. And then the bodies of the dead would have lain above ground, and have perished and rotted in a dreadful manner.

And, in fact, the task of removing dead bodies by cart had become so unpleasant and dangerous that people complained that the workers didn’t bother to clear out houses where everyone had died. Sometimes, the bodies would lie unburied for several days, until nearby families were bothered by the terrible smell and became infected as a result. The officers neglected their duty so much that church wardens and constables were called to address the issue, and even the local justices had to risk their lives to motivate and encourage them. Countless bearers died from the disease, caught from being so close to the bodies they were forced to handle. If it weren’t for the large number of poor people looking for work and food (as I mentioned before), who were driven by necessity to take on any job, they would never have found anyone willing to help. Then the dead bodies would have remained above ground, decaying and rotting in a horrific way.

But the magistrates cannot be enough commended in this, that they kept such good order for the burying of the dead, that as fast as any of these they employed to carry off and bury the dead fell sick or died, as was many times the case, they immediately supplied the places with others, which, by reason of the great number of poor that was left out of business, as above, was not hard to do. This occasioned, that notwithstanding the infinite number of people which died and were sick, almost all together, yet they were always cleared away and carried off every night, so that it was never to be said of London that the living were not able to bury the dead.

But the officials deserve a lot of praise for how well they organized the burials. Whenever someone they had hired to carry off and bury the dead got sick or died— which happened quite a lot— they quickly found someone else to take their place. Because there were so many poor people looking for work, it wasn’t hard to do. This meant that even with the huge number of people who were dying and getting sick all at once, they were always removed and buried each night, so it could never be said that the living in London couldn’t handle burying the dead.

As the desolation was greater during those terrible times, so the amazement of the people increased, and a thousand unaccountable things they would do in the violence of their fright, as others did the same in the agonies of their distemper, and this part was very affecting. Some went roaring and crying and wringing their hands along the street; some would go praying and lifting up their hands to heaven, calling upon God for mercy. I cannot say, indeed, whether this was not in their distraction, but, be it so, it was still an indication of a more serious mind, when they had the use of their senses, and was much better, even as it was, than the frightful yellings and cryings that every day, and especially in the evenings, were heard in some streets. I suppose the world has heard of the famous Solomon Eagle, an enthusiast. He, though not infected at all but in his head, went about denouncing of judgement upon the city in a frightful manner, sometimes quite naked, and with a pan of burning charcoal on his head. What he said, or pretended, indeed I could not learn.

As the devastation grew worse during those terrible times, so did the people's amazement, leading them to do a thousand inexplicable things out of sheer fear, just as others acted in the throes of their illness, and this was very moving. Some wandered the streets, howling and crying, wringing their hands; others prayed, lifting their hands to heaven and calling on God for mercy. I can't say if this was simply a result of their panic, but regardless, it showed a deeper concern when they were in control of their senses, and was much better, even as it was, than the horrid shouting and crying that filled the streets daily, especially in the evenings. I think the world has heard of the infamous Solomon Eagle, an enthusiast. He, though completely sane otherwise, wandered around denouncing judgment on the city in a terrifying way, sometimes entirely naked and with a pan of burning coals on his head. I couldn't figure out what he said or pretended to say.

I will not say whether that clergyman was distracted or not, or whether he did it in pure zeal for the poor people, who went every evening through the streets of Whitechappel, and, with his hands lifted up, repeated that part of the Liturgy of the Church continually, ‘Spare us, good Lord; spare Thy people, whom Thou has redeemed with Thy most precious blood.’ I say, I cannot speak positively of these things, because these were only the dismal objects which represented themselves to me as I looked through my chamber windows (for I seldom opened the casements), while I confined myself within doors during that most violent raging of the pestilence; when, indeed, as I have said, many began to think, and even to say, that there would none escape; and indeed I began to think so too, and therefore kept within doors for about a fortnight and never stirred out. But I could not hold it. Besides, there were some people who, notwithstanding the danger, did not omit publicly to attend the worship of God, even in the most dangerous times; and though it is true that a great many clergymen did shut up their churches, and fled, as other people did, for the safety of their lives, yet all did not do so. Some ventured to officiate and to keep up the assemblies of the people by constant prayers, and sometimes sermons or brief exhortations to repentance and reformation, and this as long as any would come to hear them. And Dissenters did the like also, and even in the very churches where the parish ministers were either dead or fled; nor was there any room for making difference at such a time as this was.

I won’t say if that clergyman was distracted or not, or if he was genuinely devoted to the poor people who walked through the streets of Whitechapel every evening. With his hands raised, he continuously recited that part of the Church Liturgy, "Spare us, good Lord; spare Thy people, whom Thou hast redeemed with Thy most precious blood." I have to say, I can’t speak definitively about these matters because these were just the bleak images that appeared to me as I looked through my window (since I rarely opened it), while I stayed indoors during the intense outbreak of the plague; when, as I mentioned, many began to think, and even say, that no one would escape. I started to think so too, which is why I kept myself inside for about two weeks without going out. But I couldn’t keep it up. Additionally, there were some people who, despite the danger, continued to gather for the worship of God, even in the most perilous times. While it’s true that many clergymen closed their churches and fled for their safety like everyone else, not all did. Some chose to carry on their duties, holding gatherings for prayer, and occasionally delivering sermons or short messages calling for repentance and reform, as long as anyone was willing to listen. Dissenters also did the same, even in the churches where the local ministers were either dead or had fled; there was no room for division at a time like this.

It was indeed a lamentable thing to hear the miserable lamentations of poor dying creatures calling out for ministers to comfort them and pray with them, to counsel them and to direct them, calling out to God for pardon and mercy, and confessing aloud their past sins. It would make the stoutest heart bleed to hear how many warnings were then given by dying penitents to others not to put off and delay their repentance to the day of distress; that such a time of calamity as this was no time for repentance, was no time to call upon God. I wish I could repeat the very sound of those groans and of those exclamations that I heard from some poor dying creatures when in the height of their agonies and distress, and that I could make him that reads this hear, as I imagine I now hear them, for the sound seems still to ring in my ears.

It was truly a heartbreaking sight to witness the sorrowful cries of poor dying people calling out for ministers to comfort and pray with them, to guide and support them, pleading with God for forgiveness and mercy, confessing their past sins out loud. It would move even the strongest heart to hear how many warnings dying individuals gave to others, urging them not to postpone their repentance until a time of crisis; that this moment of suffering was not the right time for repentance, not the time to reach out to God. I wish I could convey the exact sound of the groans and exclamations I heard from some dying individuals when they were in the depths of their pain, and that I could make anyone reading this hear them, as I still seem to hear them echoing in my ears.

If I could but tell this part in such moving accents as should alarm the very soul of the reader, I should rejoice that I recorded those things, however short and imperfect.

If I could share this part in such powerful words that it would truly resonate with the reader, I would be glad that I captured those moments, no matter how brief and imperfect.

It pleased God that I was still spared, and very hearty and sound in health, but very impatient of being pent up within doors without air, as I had been for fourteen days or thereabouts; and I could not restrain myself, but I would go to carry a letter for my brother to the post-house. Then it was indeed that I observed a profound silence in the streets. When I came to the post-house, as I went to put in my letter I saw a man stand in one corner of the yard and talking to another at a window, and a third had opened a door belonging to the office. In the middle of the yard lay a small leather purse with two keys hanging at it, with money in it, but nobody would meddle with it. I asked how long it had lain there; the man at the window said it had lain almost an hour, but that they had not meddled with it, because they did not know but the person who dropped it might come back to look for it. I had no such need of money, nor was the sum so big that I had any inclination to meddle with it, or to get the money at the hazard it might be attended with; so I seemed to go away, when the man who had opened the door said he would take it up, but so that if the right owner came for it he should be sure to have it. So he went in and fetched a pail of water and set it down hard by the purse, then went again and fetch some gunpowder, and cast a good deal of powder upon the purse, and then made a train from that which he had thrown loose upon the purse. The train reached about two yards. After this he goes in a third time and fetches out a pair of tongs red hot, and which he had prepared, I suppose, on purpose; and first setting fire to the train of powder, that singed the purse and also smoked the air sufficiently. But he was not content with that, but he then takes up the purse with the tongs, holding it so long till the tongs burnt through the purse, and then he shook the money out into the pail of water, so he carried it in. The money, as I remember, was about thirteen shilling and some smooth groats and brass farthings.

It pleased God that I was still alive and in good health, but I was really impatient about being stuck indoors without fresh air for about fourteen days. I couldn’t hold back anymore, so I decided to take a letter for my brother to the post office. When I got to the post office, I noticed how quiet the streets were. As I was about to drop off my letter, I saw a man standing in one corner of the yard talking to another man at a window, and a third man had opened a door to the office. In the center of the yard, there was a small leather purse with two keys attached, filled with money, but no one dared to touch it. I asked how long it had been there, and the man at the window said it had been almost an hour, but they hadn’t touched it because they thought the owner might come back looking for it. I didn’t need the money, nor was it a large enough amount for me to risk taking it, so I pretended to walk away when the man who opened the door said he would pick it up, making sure the rightful owner would get it back. He went inside and got a bucket of water, placing it next to the purse, then went back to fetch some gunpowder and sprinkled quite a bit on the purse, creating a fuse that stretched about two yards. After this, he went in again and brought out a pair of red-hot tongs, which I assumed he had prepared on purpose. He then lit the fuse, which singed the purse and filled the air with smoke. But that wasn’t enough for him; he picked up the purse with the tongs and held it until the tongs burned through the purse, then he shook the money out into the bucket of water and took it inside. As I recall, the money was about thirteen shillings, some smooth groats, and brass farthings.

There might perhaps have been several poor people, as I have observed above, that would have been hardy enough to have ventured for the sake of the money; but you may easily see by what I have observed that the few people who were spared were very careful of themselves at that time when the distress was so exceeding great.

There might have been a few poor people, as I mentioned earlier, who would have been bold enough to take the risk for the money. However, you can clearly see from my observations that the few individuals who were spared were very cautious about their well-being during such an extremely difficult time.

Much about the same time I walked out into the fields towards Bow; for I had a great mind to see how things were managed in the river and among the ships; and as I had some concern in shipping, I had a notion that it had been one of the best ways of securing one’s self from the infection to have retired into a ship; and musing how to satisfy my curiosity in that point, I turned away over the fields from Bow to Bromley, and down to Blackwall to the stairs which are there for landing or taking water.

Around the same time, I walked out into the fields toward Bow because I really wanted to see how things were being handled on the river and among the ships. Since I had some involvement in shipping, I thought that getting away on a ship might be one of the best ways to protect myself from the infection. While I pondered how to satisfy my curiosity about that, I made my way across the fields from Bow to Bromley and then down to Blackwall to the stairs for boarding or disembarking.

Here I saw a poor man walking on the bank, or sea-wall, as they call it, by himself. I walked a while also about, seeing the houses all shut up. At last I fell into some talk, at a distance, with this poor man; first I asked him how people did thereabouts. ‘Alas, sir!’ says he, ‘almost desolate; all dead or sick. Here are very few families in this part, or in that village’ (pointing at Poplar), ‘where half of them are not dead already, and the rest sick.’ Then he pointing to one house, ‘There they are all dead’, said he, ‘and the house stands open; nobody dares go into it. A poor thief’, says he, ‘ventured in to steal something, but he paid dear for his theft, for he was carried to the churchyard too last night.’ Then he pointed to several other houses. ‘There’, says he, ‘they are all dead, the man and his wife, and five children. There’, says he, ‘they are shut up; you see a watchman at the door’; and so of other houses. ‘Why,’ says I, ‘what do you here all alone?’ ‘Why,’ says he, ‘I am a poor, desolate man; it has pleased God I am not yet visited, though my family is, and one of my children dead.’ ‘How do you mean, then,’ said I, ‘that you are not visited?’ ‘Why,’ says he, ‘that’s my house’ (pointing to a very little, low-boarded house), ‘and there my poor wife and two children live,’ said he, ‘if they may be said to live, for my wife and one of the children are visited, but I do not come at them.’ And with that word I saw the tears run very plentifully down his face; and so they did down mine too, I assure you.

Here, I saw a poor man walking along the riverbank, or seawall, as it’s called, by himself. I wandered around for a bit, noticing that all the houses were closed up. Eventually, I started chatting from a distance with this poor man. First, I asked him how things were going around there. “Oh, sir!” he replied, “it’s almost desolate; everyone is either dead or sick. There are very few families in this area, or in that village” (pointing at Poplar), “where half of them are already dead, and the rest are sick.” Then he pointed to one house, “They’re all dead in there,” he said, “and the door is wide open; no one dares go inside. A poor thief,” he continued, “tried to sneak in to steal something, but he paid dearly for it because he was buried in the churchyard last night.” He then pointed to several other houses. “In that one,” he said, “the man, his wife, and their five children are all dead. In that one,” he said, “it’s boarded up; you can see a watchman at the door.” And there were other such houses. “Why,” I asked, “are you out here all alone?” “Well,” he replied, “I’m a poor, desolate man; it’s been a blessing from God that I haven’t been visited yet, even though my family has, and one of my children has died.” “What do you mean by ‘not visited’?” I asked. “Well,” he said, “that’s my house” (pointing to a small, low house), “and my poor wife and two children live there,” he said, “if you can even say they’re living, because my wife and one child are sick, but I don’t go near them.” As he spoke, I saw tears streaming down his face, and I couldn’t help but cry as well.

‘But,’ said I, ‘why do you not come at them? How can you abandon your own flesh and blood?’ ‘Oh, sir,’ says he, ‘the Lord forbid! I do not abandon them; I work for them as much as I am able; and, blessed be the Lord, I keep them from want’; and with that I observed he lifted up his eyes to heaven, with a countenance that presently told me I had happened on a man that was no hypocrite, but a serious, religious, good man, and his ejaculation was an expression of thankfulness that, in such a condition as he was in, he should be able to say his family did not want. ‘Well,’ says I, ‘honest man, that is a great mercy as things go now with the poor. But how do you live, then, and how are you kept from the dreadful calamity that is now upon us all?’ ‘Why, sir,’ says he, ‘I am a waterman, and there’s my boat,’ says he, ‘and the boat serves me for a house. I work in it in the day, and I sleep in it in the night; and what I get I lay down upon that stone,’ says he, showing me a broad stone on the other side of the street, a good way from his house; ‘and then,’ says he, ‘I halloo, and call to them till I make them hear; and they come and fetch it.’

“But,” I said, “why don’t you go to them? How can you abandon your own family?” “Oh, sir,” he replied, “God forbid! I don’t abandon them; I do everything I can for them, and, thank God, I keep them from going hungry.” As he said this, I noticed him looking up to heaven, and his expression immediately told me I was talking to a genuine, devout, good person. His words were a heartfelt thankfulness that, despite his situation, he could say his family was not in need. “Well,” I said, “honest man, that’s a great blessing considering how tough things are for the poor right now. But how do you survive, and how are you spared from the terrible hardships that affect us all?” “Well, sir,” he answered, “I’m a waterman, and there’s my boat,” he said, “and the boat is my home. I work in it during the day and sleep in it at night. Whatever I earn, I put down on that stone,” he said, pointing to a large stone across the street, quite a distance from his house; “and then,” he added, “I shout and call out to them until they can hear me, and they come and pick it up.”

‘Well, friend,’ says I, ‘but how can you get any money as a waterman? Does any body go by water these times?’ ‘Yes, sir,’ says he, ‘in the way I am employed there does. Do you see there,’ says he, ‘five ships lie at anchor’ (pointing down the river a good way below the town), ‘and do you see’, says he, ‘eight or ten ships lie at the chain there, and at anchor yonder?’ (pointing above the town). ‘All those ships have families on board, of their merchants and owners, and such-like, who have locked themselves up and live on board, close shut in, for fear of the infection; and I tend on them to fetch things for them, carry letters, and do what is absolutely necessary, that they may not be obliged to come on shore; and every night I fasten my boat on board one of the ship’s boats, and there I sleep by myself, and, blessed be God, I am preserved hitherto.’

‘Well, buddy,’ I said, ‘but how can you make any money as a waterman? Does anyone even travel by water these days?’ ‘Yeah, sir,’ he replied, ‘in the way I’m working, they do. You see down there,’ he said, ‘five ships are anchored’ (pointing further down the river below the town), ‘and you see’, he continued, ‘eight or ten ships are moored there, and anchored over there?’ (pointing above the town). ‘All those ships have families on board, like their merchants and owners, who have locked themselves up and live on board, all shut in, because they’re afraid of getting sick; and I help them by getting things for them, delivering letters, and doing what’s absolutely necessary so they don’t have to come ashore; and every night I tie my boat to one of the ship’s boats, and there I sleep by myself, and, thank God, I’m safe so far.’

‘Well,’ said I, ‘friend, but will they let you come on board after you have been on shore here, when this is such a terrible place, and so infected as it is?’

‘Well,’ I said, ‘but will they let you come on board after being on shore here, considering how awful and infected this place is?’

‘Why, as to that,’ said he, ‘I very seldom go up the ship-side, but deliver what I bring to their boat, or lie by the side, and they hoist it on board. If I did, I think they are in no danger from me, for I never go into any house on shore, or touch anybody, no, not of my own family; but I fetch provisions for them.’

‘Well, about that,’ he said, ‘I hardly ever go up the side of the ship. I usually just hand over what I bring to their boat, or I stay by the side, and they lift it on board. If I did go up, I don’t think they’d be in any danger from me, because I never go into any house on shore or touch anyone, not even my own family; I just get supplies for them.’

‘Nay,’ says I, ‘but that may be worse, for you must have those provisions of somebody or other; and since all this part of the town is so infected, it is dangerous so much as to speak with anybody, for the village’, said I, ‘is, as it were, the beginning of London, though it be at some distance from it.’

‘No,’ I said, ‘but that might be worse, because you must get those supplies from someone. And since this part of town is so contaminated, it's risky to even talk to anyone, because the village,’ I said, ‘is kind of the start of London, even if it's a bit far from it.’

‘That is true,’ added he; ‘but you do not understand me right; I do not buy provisions for them here. I row up to Greenwich and buy fresh meat there, and sometimes I row down the river to Woolwich and buy there; then I go to single farm-houses on the Kentish side, where I am known, and buy fowls and eggs and butter, and bring to the ships, as they direct me, sometimes one, sometimes the other. I seldom come on shore here, and I came now only to call on my wife and hear how my family do, and give them a little money, which I received last night.’

"That's true," he added, "but you don't really understand me; I don't buy supplies for them here. I row up to Greenwich to buy fresh meat, and sometimes I head down the river to Woolwich to get it there. Then, I visit individual farmhouses on the Kentish side, where I'm known, and I buy chickens, eggs, and butter to bring to the ships, as they ask me to, sometimes one place, sometimes another. I rarely come ashore here, and I only came this time to check on my wife, see how my family is doing, and give them a little money I got last night."

‘Poor man!’ said I; ‘and how much hast thou gotten for them?’

"Poor guy!" I said; "and how much have you gotten for them?"

‘I have gotten four shillings,’ said he, ‘which is a great sum, as things go now with poor men; but they have given me a bag of bread too, and a salt fish and some flesh; so all helps out.’ ‘Well,’ said I, ‘and have you given it them yet?’

‘I’ve got four shillings,’ he said, ‘which is a lot, considering how things are for poor people these days; but they also gave me a bag of bread, some salted fish, and some meat; so everything helps.’ ‘Well,’ I said, ‘have you given it to them yet?’

‘No,’ said he; ‘but I have called, and my wife has answered that she cannot come out yet, but in half-an-hour she hopes to come, and I am waiting for her. Poor woman!’ says he, ‘she is brought sadly down. She has a swelling, and it is broke, and I hope she will recover; but I fear the child will die, but it is the Lord—’

‘No,’ he said; ‘but I’ve called, and my wife replied that she can’t come out yet, but she hopes to be out in half an hour, and I’m waiting for her. Poor woman!’ he says, ‘she’s really struggling. She has a swelling that has burst, and I hope she will get better; but I’m afraid the child won’t survive, but it’s in the Lord’s hands—’

Here he stopped, and wept very much.

Here he stopped and cried a lot.

‘Well, honest friend,’ said I, ‘thou hast a sure Comforter, if thou hast brought thyself to be resigned to the will of God; He is dealing with us all in judgement.’

"Well, my honest friend," I said, "you have a solid comfort if you've managed to accept God's will; He's dealing with all of us in judgment."

‘Oh, sir!’ says he, ‘it is infinite mercy if any of us are spared, and who am I to repine!’

‘Oh, sir!’ he says, ‘it's an endless mercy if any of us are spared, and who am I to complain!’

‘Sayest thou so?’ said I, ‘and how much less is my faith than thine?’ And here my heart smote me, suggesting how much better this poor man’s foundation was on which he stayed in the danger than mine; that he had nowhere to fly; that he had a family to bind him to attendance, which I had not; and mine was mere presumption, his a true dependence and a courage resting on God; and yet that he used all possible caution for his safety.

“Do you really think so?” I replied, “and how is my faith any less than yours?” At that moment, I felt a pang of guilt, realizing how much stronger this poor man’s foundation was in facing danger compared to mine. He had nowhere to escape to, and he had a family depending on him, which I did not have. My faith was merely arrogance, while his was genuine reliance and courage grounded in God. Still, he took every possible precaution for his safety.

I turned a little way from the man while these thoughts engaged me, for, indeed, I could no more refrain from tears than he.

I turned slightly away from the man while I was lost in these thoughts because, honestly, I couldn't hold back my tears any more than he could.

At length, after some further talk, the poor woman opened the door and called, ‘Robert, Robert’. He answered, and bid her stay a few moments and he would come; so he ran down the common stairs to his boat and fetched up a sack, in which was the provisions he had brought from the ships; and when he returned he hallooed again. Then he went to the great stone which he showed me and emptied the sack, and laid all out, everything by themselves, and then retired; and his wife came with a little boy to fetch them away, and called and said such a captain had sent such a thing, and such a captain such a thing, and at the end adds, ‘God has sent it all; give thanks to Him.’ When the poor woman had taken up all, she was so weak she could not carry it at once in, though the weight was not much neither; so she left the biscuit, which was in a little bag, and left a little boy to watch it till she came again.

Finally, after some more conversation, the poor woman opened the door and called, “Robert, Robert.” He replied, telling her to wait a moment and he would be right there. He quickly ran down the common stairs to his boat and grabbed a sack filled with supplies he had brought from the ships. When he returned, he yelled out again. Then he went to the large stone he had shown me and emptied the sack, laying everything out separately. After that, he stepped back, and his wife came with their young son to collect the items. She called out and mentioned that one captain had sent one thing, and another captain had sent something else, and in the end, she added, “God has sent it all; give thanks to Him.” Once the poor woman gathered everything, she was so weak that she couldn’t carry it all in at once, even though it wasn’t very heavy. So, she left the biscuits, which were in a small bag, and had her little boy watch them until she returned.

‘Well, but’, says I to him, ‘did you leave her the four shillings too, which you said was your week’s pay?’

‘Well, but,’ I said to him, ‘did you leave her the four shillings too, which you said was your week’s pay?’

‘Yes, yes,’ says he; ‘you shall hear her own it.’ So he calls again, ‘Rachel, Rachel,’ which it seems was her name, ‘did you take up the money?’ ‘Yes,’ said she. ‘How much was it?’ said he. ‘Four shillings and a groat,’ said she. ‘Well, well,’ says he, ‘the Lord keep you all’; and so he turned to go away.

‘Yes, yes,’ he says; ‘you'll hear her admit it.’ So he calls out again, ‘Rachel, Rachel,’ which turns out to be her name, ‘did you take the money?’ ‘Yes,’ she replies. ‘How much was it?’ he asks. ‘Four shillings and a groat,’ she answers. ‘Alright, alright,’ he says, ‘may the Lord protect you all’; and then he turns to leave.

As I could not refrain contributing tears to this man’s story, so neither could I refrain my charity for his assistance. So I called him, ‘Hark thee, friend,’ said I, ‘come hither, for I believe thou art in health, that I may venture thee’; so I pulled out my hand, which was in my pocket before, ‘Here,’ says I, ‘go and call thy Rachel once more, and give her a little more comfort from me. God will never forsake a family that trust in Him as thou dost.’ So I gave him four other shillings, and bid him go lay them on the stone and call his wife.

As I couldn't help shedding tears for this man's story, I also couldn't hold back my desire to help him. So I called out to him, "Hey there, my friend," I said, "come here, because I believe you're in good health, so I’ll take a chance on you." I then pulled my hand out of my pocket, “Here,” I said, “go and call your Rachel again, and give her a little more comfort from me. God will never abandon a family that trusts in Him like you do.” Then I gave him four more shillings and asked him to place them on the stone and call his wife.

I have not words to express the poor man’s thankfulness, neither could he express it himself but by tears running down his face. He called his wife, and told her God had moved the heart of a stranger, upon hearing their condition, to give them all that money, and a great deal more such as that he said to her. The woman, too, made signs of the like thankfulness, as well to Heaven as to me, and joyfully picked it up; and I parted with no money all that year that I thought better bestowed.

I have no words to describe the gratitude of the poor man, and he couldn't express it either, except through the tears streaming down his face. He called his wife and told her that God had moved the heart of a stranger, who, upon hearing about their situation, decided to give them all that money, and much more besides, as he said to her. The woman also showed her gratitude, both to God and to me, and happily collected the money; I didn't spend any of my own money that year on anything I thought was better used.

I then asked the poor man if the distemper had not reached to Greenwich. He said it had not till about a fortnight before; but that then he feared it had, but that it was only at that end of the town which lay south towards Deptford Bridge; that he went only to a butcher’s shop and a grocer’s, where he generally bought such things as they sent him for, but was very careful.

I then asked the poor man if the illness had spread to Greenwich. He said it hadn’t until about two weeks ago; however, he was worried that it had, but only in the part of town that was south towards Deptford Bridge. He mentioned that he only went to a butcher’s shop and a grocery store, where he usually bought the items they sent him for, but he was very careful.

I asked him then how it came to pass that those people who had so shut themselves up in the ships had not laid in sufficient stores of all things necessary. He said some of them had—but, on the other hand, some did not come on board till they were frighted into it and till it was too dangerous for them to go to the proper people to lay in quantities of things, and that he waited on two ships, which he showed me, that had laid in little or nothing but biscuit bread and ship beer, and that he had bought everything else almost for them. I asked him if there was any more ships that had separated themselves as those had done. He told me yes, all the way up from the point, right against Greenwich, to within the shore of Limehouse and Redriff, all the ships that could have room rid two and two in the middle of the stream, and that some of them had several families on board. I asked him if the distemper had not reached them. He said he believed it had not, except two or three ships whose people had not been so watchful to keep the seamen from going on shore as others had been, and he said it was a very fine sight to see how the ships lay up the Pool.

I asked him how it happened that the people who had locked themselves in the ships hadn't stocked up enough supplies. He said some of them had—however, some didn't come on board until they were scared into it, and by then it was too dangerous for them to go to the right people to gather enough supplies. He pointed out two ships that had hardly anything but biscuit bread and ship beer, and he had bought almost everything else for them. I asked him if there were any more ships that had isolated themselves like those did. He said yes, all the way from the point, right across from Greenwich, to the shore of Limehouse and Redriff, all the ships that had enough space anchored two by two in the middle of the stream, and some had multiple families on board. I asked him if the illness had reached them. He said he believed it hadn't, except for two or three ships where the people hadn't been as careful to keep the sailors from going ashore as others had been, and he mentioned it was a really beautiful sight to see how the ships were lined up in the Pool.

When he said he was going over to Greenwich as soon as the tide began to come in, I asked if he would let me go with him and bring me back, for that I had a great mind to see how the ships were ranged, as he had told me. He told me, if I would assure him on the word of a Christian and of an honest man that I had not the distemper, he would. I assured him that I had not; that it had pleased God to preserve me; that I lived in Whitechappel, but was too impatient of being so long within doors, and that I had ventured out so far for the refreshment of a little air, but that none in my house had so much as been touched with it.

When he said he was heading over to Greenwich as soon as the tide started coming in, I asked if I could go with him and if he could bring me back. I really wanted to see how the ships were lined up, like he had described. He told me that if I could promise him on the word of a Christian and an honest man that I didn't have the sickness, he would let me go. I assured him that I didn’t; that it had pleased God to keep me safe; that I lived in Whitechapel but was too restless staying indoors for so long, and that I had ventured out just to get a little fresh air. I also told him that nobody in my house had even been touched by it.

‘Well, sir,’ says he, ‘as your charity has been moved to pity me and my poor family, sure you cannot have so little pity left as to put yourself into my boat if you were not sound in health which would be nothing less than killing me and ruining my whole family.’ The poor man troubled me so much when he spoke of his family with such a sensible concern and in such an affectionate manner, that I could not satisfy myself at first to go at all. I told him I would lay aside my curiosity rather than make him uneasy, though I was sure, and very thankful for it, that I had no more distemper upon me than the freshest man in the world. Well, he would not have me put it off neither, but to let me see how confident he was that I was just to him, now importuned me to go; so when the tide came up to his boat I went in, and he carried me to Greenwich. While he bought the things which he had in his charge to buy, I walked up to the top of the hill under which the town stands, and on the east side of the town, to get a prospect of the river. But it was a surprising sight to see the number of ships which lay in rows, two and two, and some places two or three such lines in the breadth of the river, and this not only up quite to the town, between the houses which we call Ratcliff and Redriff, which they name the Pool, but even down the whole river as far as the head of Long Reach, which is as far as the hills give us leave to see it.

‘Well, sir,’ he says, ‘since your kindness has moved you to feel for me and my poor family, surely you can’t have so little compassion as to step into my boat if you weren’t in good health, which would only end up hurting me and ruining my whole family.’ The poor man troubled me so much when he talked about his family with such genuine concern and in such a caring way that I couldn't bring myself to go at all at first. I told him I would set aside my curiosity rather than make him uncomfortable, although I was sure, and very grateful for it, that I was no more unwell than the healthiest person out there. Well, he wouldn’t let me off the hook either; instead, he insisted that I was being fair to him and kept urging me to go. So, when the tide came up to his boat, I got in, and he took me to Greenwich. While he bought the things he needed to get, I walked up to the top of the hill where the town sits on the east side, to get a view of the river. It was an amazing sight to see the number of ships lined up in rows, two by two, and in some spots two or three lines across the width of the river. This was not just up to the town, between the areas we call Ratcliff and Redriff, which they refer to as the Pool, but even down the whole river as far as the head of Long Reach, which is as far as the hills allow us to see.

I cannot guess at the number of ships, but I think there must be several hundreds of sail; and I could not but applaud the contrivance: for ten thousand people and more who attended ship affairs were certainly sheltered here from the violence of the contagion, and lived very safe and very easy.

I can’t estimate the number of ships, but I think there are at least several hundred. I couldn't help but admire the setup: because ten thousand or more people involved in shipping were definitely protected here from the threat of disease, and they lived safely and comfortably.

I returned to my own dwelling very well satisfied with my day’s journey, and particularly with the poor man; also I rejoiced to see that such little sanctuaries were provided for so many families in a time of such desolation. I observed also that, as the violence of the plague had increased, so the ships which had families on board removed and went farther off, till, as I was told, some went quite away to sea, and put into such harbours and safe roads on the north coast as they could best come at.

I went back to my own place feeling really satisfied with my day’s trip, especially with the kindhearted man. I was also glad to see that there were small refuges set up for so many families during such a tough time. I noticed that as the plague got worse, the ships with families on board moved farther away, and I heard that some even went out to sea, finding whatever safe harbors they could reach on the north coast.

But it was also true that all the people who thus left the land and lived on board the ships were not entirely safe from the infection, for many died and were thrown overboard into the river, some in coffins, and some, as I heard, without coffins, whose bodies were seen sometimes to drive up and down with the tide in the river.

But it was also true that everyone who left the land and lived on the ships wasn’t completely safe from the infection, as many died and were thrown overboard into the river, some in coffins and others, as I heard, without coffins, whose bodies were sometimes seen drifting up and down with the tide in the river.

But I believe I may venture to say that in those ships which were thus infected it either happened where the people had recourse to them too late, and did not fly to the ship till they had stayed too long on shore and had the distemper upon them (though perhaps they might not perceive it) and so the distemper did not come to them on board the ships, but they really carried it with them; or it was in these ships where the poor waterman said they had not had time to furnish themselves with provisions, but were obliged to send often on shore to buy what they had occasion for, or suffered boats to come to them from the shore. And so the distemper was brought insensibly among them.

But I think I can say that in those ships that were affected, it either happened because the people waited too long to board and didn’t escape to the ship until they were already sick (even if they didn’t realize it), so the illness didn’t come to them on the ship; they actually brought it with them. Or it was on these ships where the poor waterman said they hadn’t had time to stock up on supplies and had to regularly send people ashore to buy what they needed or allowed boats to come from the shore. So, the illness was gradually introduced among them.

And here I cannot but take notice that the strange temper of the people of London at that time contributed extremely to their own destruction. The plague began, as I have observed, at the other end of the town, namely, in Long Acre, Drury Lane, &c., and came on towards the city very gradually and slowly. It was felt at first in December, then again in February, then again in April, and always but a very little at a time; then it stopped till May, and even the last week in May there was but seventeen, and all at that end of the town; and all this while, even so long as till there died above 3000 a week, yet had the people in Redriff, and in Wapping and Ratcliff, on both sides of the river, and almost all Southwark side, a mighty fancy that they should not be visited, or at least that it would not be so violent among them. Some people fancied the smell of the pitch and tar, and such other things as oil and rosin and brimstone, which is so much used by all trades relating to shipping, would preserve them. Others argued it, because it was in its extreamest violence in Westminster and the parish of St Giles and St Andrew, &c., and began to abate again before it came among them—which was true indeed, in part. For example—

And here I have to point out that the strange mindset of people in London at that time greatly contributed to their own downfall. The plague started, as I mentioned, at the far end of the town, specifically in Long Acre, Drury Lane, etc., and it spread towards the city very gradually and slowly. It was first felt in December, then again in February, then again in April, and always just a little at a time; then it paused until May, and even in the last week of May, there were only seventeen cases, all at that end of the town. Meanwhile, even when deaths exceeded 3000 a week, the people in Redriff, Wapping, and Ratcliff, on both sides of the river, as well as almost all of Southwark, had a strong belief that they wouldn't be affected, or at least that it wouldn't be so severe for them. Some believed the smell of pitch and tar, along with other substances like oil, rosin, and brimstone—which were heavily used in all shipping-related trades—would protect them. Others reasoned that since the plague was at its worst in Westminster and the parishes of St. Giles and St. Andrew, it started to decline before it made its way to them—which was partly true. For example—

     From the 8th to the 15th August—
     -    St Giles-in-the-Fields               242
     -    Cripplegate                          886
     -    Stepney                              197
     -    St Margaret, Bermondsey               24
     -    Rotherhithe                            3
     -    Total this week                     4030

     From the 15th to the 22nd August—
     -    St Giles-in-the-Fields               175
     -    Cripplegate                          847
     -    Stepney                              273
     -    St Margaret, Bermondsey               36
     -    Rotherhithe                            2
     -    Total this week                     5319
     From August 8th to 15th—
     -    St Giles-in-the-Fields               242
     -    Cripplegate                          886
     -    Stepney                              197
     -    St Margaret, Bermondsey               24
     -    Rotherhithe                            3
     -    Total this week                     4030

     From August 15th to 22nd—
     -    St Giles-in-the-Fields               175
     -    Cripplegate                          847
     -    Stepney                              273
     -    St Margaret, Bermondsey               36
     -    Rotherhithe                            2
     -    Total this week                     5319

N.B.—That it was observed the numbers mentioned in Stepney parish at that time were generally all on that side where Stepney parish joined to Shoreditch, which we now call Spittlefields, where the parish of Stepney comes up to the very wall of Shoreditch Churchyard, and the plague at this time was abated at St Giles-in-the-Fields, and raged most violently in Cripplegate, Bishopsgate, and Shoreditch parishes; but there was not ten people a week that died of it in all that part of Stepney parish which takes in Limehouse, Ratcliff Highway, and which are now the parishes of Shadwell and Wapping, even to St Katherine’s by the Tower, till after the whole month of August was expired. But they paid for it afterwards, as I shall observe by-and-by.

N.B.—It was noted that the numbers mentioned in Stepney parish at that time were mostly on the side where Stepney parish borders Shoreditch, which we now call Spitalfields, where the parish of Stepney meets the wall of Shoreditch Churchyard. At this time, the plague had calmed down at St Giles-in-the-Fields but was spreading most rapidly in the Cripplegate, Bishopsgate, and Shoreditch parishes. However, fewer than ten people a week died from it in all that part of Stepney parish that includes Limehouse, Ratcliffe Highway, and what are now the parishes of Shadwell and Wapping, stretching to St Katherine’s by the Tower, until after the entire month of August had passed. But they faced the consequences later, as I will explain soon.

This, I say, made the people of Redriff and Wapping, Ratcliff and Limehouse, so secure, and flatter themselves so much with the plague’s going off without reaching them, that they took no care either to fly into the country or shut themselves up. Nay, so far were they from stirring that they rather received their friends and relations from the city into their houses, and several from other places really took sanctuary in that part of the town as a place of safety, and as a place which they thought God would pass over, and not visit as the rest was visited.

This, I say, made the people of Redriff and Wapping, Ratcliff and Limehouse, feel very secure and overly confident that the plague wouldn’t reach them. They didn’t bother to escape to the countryside or isolate themselves. In fact, they were so unbothered that they welcomed friends and family from the city into their homes, and many from elsewhere actually sought refuge in that part of town, believing it to be a safe haven that God would overlook, not striking it as He did the rest.

And this was the reason that when it came upon them they were more surprised, more unprovided, and more at a loss what to do than they were in other places; for when it came among them really and with violence, as it did indeed in September and October, there was then no stirring out into the country, nobody would suffer a stranger to come near them, no, nor near the towns where they dwelt; and, as I have been told, several that wandered into the country on Surrey side were found starved to death in the woods and commons, that country being more open and more woody than any other part so near London, especially about Norwood and the parishes of Camberwell, Dullege, and Lusum, where, it seems, nobody durst relieve the poor distressed people for fear of the infection.

And this is why, when it happened to them, they were more shocked, less prepared, and more confused about what to do than in other places. When it struck them with real force, like it did in September and October, no one ventured out into the countryside, and nobody would let a stranger come near them—not even near the towns where they lived. I've heard that several people who wandered out into the countryside on the Surrey side were found starving to death in the woods and fields, which are more open and wooded than any other area close to London, especially around Norwood and the parishes of Camberwell, Dullege, and Lusum, where it seems that nobody dared to help the unfortunate people for fear of catching the infection.

This notion having, as I said, prevailed with the people in that part of the town, was in part the occasion, as I said before, that they had recourse to ships for their retreat; and where they did this early and with prudence, furnishing themselves so with provisions that they had no need to go on shore for supplies or suffer boats to come on board to bring them,—I say, where they did so they had certainly the safest retreat of any people whatsoever; but the distress was such that people ran on board, in their fright, without bread to eat, and some into ships that had no men on board to remove them farther off, or to take the boat and go down the river to buy provisions where it might be done safely, and these often suffered and were infected on board as much as on shore.

This idea, as I mentioned earlier, was popular among the people in that part of the town, and it partly led them to take refuge on ships. Those who did this early and wisely stocked up on supplies so they didn't need to go ashore or have boats come on board for provisions certainly had the safest escape of anyone. However, the panic was so intense that people rushed onto ships in their fear without any food, and some ended up on vessels that had no crew to take them further away or to send a boat down the river to get supplies where it could be done safely. These people often faced the same hardships and risks on board as they did on land.

As the richer sort got into ships, so the lower rank got into hoys, smacks, lighters, and fishing-boats; and many, especially watermen, lay in their boats; but those made sad work of it, especially the latter, for, going about for provision, and perhaps to get their subsistence, the infection got in among them and made a fearful havoc; many of the watermen died alone in their wherries as they rid at their roads, as well as above bridge as below, and were not found sometimes till they were not in condition for anybody to touch or come near them.

As the wealthy boarded ships, the lower class got into smaller boats like hoys, smacks, lighters, and fishing boats; many, especially the watermen, stayed in their boats. However, they faced terrible troubles, particularly the latter, because while trying to get supplies and maybe earn a living, the infection spread among them and caused devastating losses. Many watermen died alone in their boats while anchored, both above and below the bridge, and sometimes they weren't discovered until it was too late for anyone to approach them.

Indeed, the distress of the people at this seafaring end of the town was very deplorable, and deserved the greatest commiseration. But, alas! this was a time when every one’s private safety lay so near them that they had no room to pity the distresses of others; for every one had death, as it were, at his door, and many even in their families, and knew not what to do or whither to fly.

Indeed, the suffering of the people at this seaside end of town was very tragic and deserved the utmost sympathy. But, sadly, this was a time when everyone's personal safety was so immediate that they had no space to feel for the struggles of others; everyone had death, so to speak, at their doorstep, and many even faced it within their own families, not knowing what to do or where to go.

This, I say, took away all compassion; self-preservation, indeed, appeared here to be the first law. For the children ran away from their parents as they languished in the utmost distress. And in some places, though not so frequent as the other, parents did the like to their children; nay, some dreadful examples there were, and particularly two in one week, of distressed mothers, raving and distracted, killing their own children; one whereof was not far off from where I dwelt, the poor lunatic creature not living herself long enough to be sensible of the sin of what she had done, much less to be punished for it.

This, I say, took away all compassion; self-preservation really seemed to be the main rule here. The children fled from their parents as they suffered in extreme distress. In some places, though not as often, parents did the same to their children; indeed, there were some horrifying cases, especially two in one week, of desperate mothers, insane and distraught, killing their own children; one of these was not far from where I lived, the unfortunate woman not surviving long enough to understand the sin of what she had done, let alone be punished for it.

It is not, indeed, to be wondered at: for the danger of immediate death to ourselves took away all bowels of love, all concern for one another. I speak in general, for there were many instances of immovable affection, pity, and duty in many, and some that came to my knowledge, that is to say, by hearsay; for I shall not take upon me to vouch the truth of the particulars.

It’s not surprising, really: the threat of imminent death made us lose all sense of love and concern for each other. I'm speaking generally, as there were many examples of unwavering affection, compassion, and a sense of duty in some people, and a few that I've heard about, but I won't claim to verify the details.

To introduce one, let me first mention that one of the most deplorable cases in all the present calamity was that of women with child, who, when they came to the hour of their sorrows, and their pains come upon them, could neither have help of one kind or another; neither midwife or neighbouring women to come near them. Most of the midwives were dead, especially of such as served the poor; and many, if not all the midwives of note, were fled into the country; so that it was next to impossible for a poor woman that could not pay an immoderate price to get any midwife to come to her—and if they did, those they could get were generally unskilful and ignorant creatures; and the consequence of this was that a most unusual and incredible number of women were reduced to the utmost distress. Some were delivered and spoiled by the rashness and ignorance of those who pretended to lay them. Children without number were, I might say, murdered by the same but a more justifiable ignorance: pretending they would save the mother, whatever became of the child; and many times both mother and child were lost in the same manner; and especially where the mother had the distemper, there nobody would come near them and both sometimes perished. Sometimes the mother has died of the plague, and the infant, it may be, half born, or born but not parted from the mother. Some died in the very pains of their travail, and not delivered at all; and so many were the cases of this kind that it is hard to judge of them.

To start, I have to highlight that one of the most tragic situations during this whole disaster was the plight of expectant mothers. When they went into labor and faced their pain, they found themselves without any help at all—no midwives or neighboring women could assist them. Most midwives had died, particularly those who assisted the poor, and many of the more prominent midwives had fled to the countryside. This left poor women, who couldn’t afford to pay exorbitant fees, with no options for midwifery care. If they did manage to find someone, those available were often untrained and unaware of proper procedures. As a result, an astonishingly high number of women faced severe distress. Some were harmed due to the recklessness and ignorance of those trying to help them deliver. Countless children were, I could say, killed by this lack of knowledge: those assisting often claimed they were trying to save the mother, no matter what happened to the child; many times, both mother and child would perish in the same situation. Especially where the mother had an illness, no one would come near, and sometimes both died. Occasionally, the mother would die from the plague, leaving her infant possibly still attached or barely born. Some mothers died during labor without ever delivering their babies, and there were so many instances like this that it’s hard to even comprehend them.

Something of it will appear in the unusual numbers which are put into the weekly bills (though I am far from allowing them to be able to give anything of a full account) under the articles of—

Something of it will show up in the unusual numbers included in the weekly bills (though I definitely don’t think they can provide a complete account) under the articles of—

     Child-bed.
     Abortive and Still-born.
     Chrisoms and Infants.
     Childbirth.  
     Miscarriages and Stillbirths.  
     Newborns and Infants.  

Take the weeks in which the plague was most violent, and compare them with the weeks before the distemper began, even in the same year. For example:—

Take the weeks when the plague was at its worst and compare them to the weeks before the illness started, even within the same year. For instance:—

     Child-bed. Abortive.  Still-born.
     From January 3 to January  10     7        1           13
     ”     ”   10       ”       17     8        6           11
     ”     ”   17       ”       24     9        5           15
     ”     ”   24       ”       31     3        2            9
     ”     ”   31 to February    7     3        3            8
     ” February 7        ”      14     6        2           11
     ”     ”   14       ”       21     5        2           13
     ”     ”   21       ”       28     2        2           10
     ”     ”   28 to March       7     5        1           10
     -                               —-      —-         ——
     -                                48       24          100

     From August  1 to August    8    25        5           11
     ”     ”    8       ”       15    23        6            8
     ”     ”   15       ”       22    28        4            4
     ”     ”   22       ”       29    40        6           10
     ”     ”   29 to September   5    38        2           11
     September  5       ”       12    39       23          ...
     ”     ”   12       ”       19    42        5           17
     ”     ”   19       ”       26    42        6           10
     ”     ”   26 to October     3    14        4            9
     -                               —-       —          —-
     -                               291       61           80
     Childbirth. Miscarriage. Stillbirth.
     From January 3 to January  10     7        1           13
     ”     ”   10       ”       17     8        6           11
     ”     ”   17       ”       24     9        5           15
     ”     ”   24       ”       31     3        2            9
     ”     ”   31 to February    7     3        3            8
     ” February 7        ”      14     6        2           11
     ”     ”   14       ”       21     5        2           13
     ”     ”   21       ”       28     2        2           10
     ”     ”   28 to March       7     5        1           10
     -                               —-      —-         ——
     -                                48       24          100

     From August  1 to August    8    25        5           11
     ”     ”    8       ”       15    23        6            8
     ”     ”   15       ”       22    28        4            4
     ”     ”   22       ”       29    40        6           10
     ”     ”   29 to September   5    38        2           11
     September  5       ”       12    39       23          ...
     ”     ”   12       ”       19    42        5           17
     ”     ”   19       ”       26    42        6           10
     ”     ”   26 to October     3    14        4            9
     -                               —-       —          —-
     -                               291       61           80

To the disparity of these numbers it is to be considered and allowed for, that according to our usual opinion who were then upon the spot, there were not one-third of the people in the town during the months of August and September as were in the months of January and February. In a word, the usual number that used to die of these three articles, and, as I hear, did die of them the year before, was thus:—

To account for the difference in these numbers, it's important to note that, based on what we usually believe, there were not even a third of the people in town during August and September compared to January and February. In summary, the usual number of deaths from these three causes, which I understand matched the previous year's figures, was as follows:—

     1664.                               1665.
     Child-bed                   189     Child-bed                   625
     Abortive and still-born     458     Abortive and still-born     617
     -                          ——                                ——
     -                           647                                1242
     1664.                               1665.
     Child-bed                   189     Child-bed                   625
     Abortive and still-born     458     Abortive and still-born     617
     -                          ——                                ——
     -                           647                                1242

This inequality, I say, is exceedingly augmented when the numbers of people are considered. I pretend not to make any exact calculation of the numbers of people which were at this time in the city, but I shall make a probable conjecture at that part by-and-by. What I have said now is to explain the misery of those poor creatures above; so that it might well be said, as in the Scripture, Woe be to those who are with child, and to those which give suck in that day. For, indeed, it was a woe to them in particular.

This inequality, I say, gets even worse when you consider the number of people involved. I'm not trying to make any precise calculation of how many people were in the city at that time, but I’ll offer a reasonable guess about that later. What I've mentioned now is to highlight the suffering of those poor individuals mentioned earlier; so it could truly be said, as in the Scripture, “Woe to those who are pregnant, and to those who are nursing on that day.” Because, indeed, it was especially tragic for them.

I was not conversant in many particular families where these things happened, but the outcries of the miserable were heard afar off. As to those who were with child, we have seen some calculation made; 291 women dead in child-bed in nine weeks, out of one-third part of the number of whom there usually died in that time but eighty-four of the same disaster. Let the reader calculate the proportion.

I wasn’t familiar with many specific families where these events occurred, but the cries of the suffering could be heard from a distance. As for those who were pregnant, I’ve seen some calculations made; 291 women died during childbirth in nine weeks, whereas typically only about eighty-four would die from the same issue in that time frame. Let the reader figure out the ratio.

There is no room to doubt but the misery of those that gave suck was in proportion as great. Our bills of mortality could give but little light in this, yet some it did. There were several more than usual starved at nurse, but this was nothing. The misery was where they were, first, starved for want of a nurse, the mother dying and all the family and the infants found dead by them, merely for want; and, if I may speak my opinion, I do believe that many hundreds of poor helpless infants perished in this manner. Secondly, not starved, but poisoned by the nurse. Nay, even where the mother has been nurse, and having received the infection, has poisoned, that is, infected the infant with her milk even before they knew they were infected themselves; nay, and the infant has died in such a case before the mother. I cannot but remember to leave this admonition upon record, if ever such another dreadful visitation should happen in this city, that all women that are with child or that give suck should be gone, if they have any possible means, out of the place, because their misery, if infected, will so much exceed all other people’s.

There's no doubt that the suffering of those who were nursing was just as severe. Our death records don't provide much insight into this, but they do offer some information. More infants than usual died while being cared for, but that was just part of it. The real tragedy was the situation where they were left without a caregiver—the mother had died, and the whole family, including the infants, were found dead, simply due to lack of resources. In my opinion, I truly believe that many hundreds of helpless infants died this way. There were also cases where they weren’t just starved, but poisoned by the caregiver. In fact, even when the mother was nursing, if she had been infected, she could have passed the infection to the infant through her milk, sometimes even before they realized they were infected themselves; tragically, the infant sometimes died before the mother did. I feel it's important to make a note of this as a warning: if another terrible outbreak occurs in this city, all pregnant women or nursing mothers should leave, if at all possible, because their suffering, if they become infected, will be far worse than that of others.

I could tell here dismal stories of living infants being found sucking the breasts of their mothers, or nurses, after they have been dead of the plague. Of a mother in the parish where I lived, who, having a child that was not well, sent for an apothecary to view the child; and when he came, as the relation goes, was giving the child suck at her breast, and to all appearance was herself very well; but when the apothecary came close to her he saw the tokens upon that breast with which she was suckling the child. He was surprised enough, to be sure, but, not willing to fright the poor woman too much, he desired she would give the child into his hand; so he takes the child, and going to a cradle in the room, lays it in, and opening its cloths, found the tokens upon the child too, and both died before he could get home to send a preventive medicine to the father of the child, to whom he had told their condition. Whether the child infected the nurse-mother or the mother the child was not certain, but the last most likely. Likewise of a child brought home to the parents from a nurse that had died of the plague, yet the tender mother would not refuse to take in her child, and laid it in her bosom, by which she was infected; and died with the child in her arms dead also.

I could share some grim stories about living infants being found suckling from their deceased mothers or nurses after they died from the plague. There was a mother in my neighborhood who had a child that was sick and called for a doctor to examine the child. When he arrived, as the story goes, she was breastfeeding the child and seemed to be perfectly fine herself. However, when the doctor got closer, he noticed signs of infection on the breast she was using to feed the child. He was understandably shocked, but not wanting to frighten the poor woman too much, he asked her to hand the baby over to him. He took the child, went to a cradle in the room, laid it down, and, upon opening its clothes, found the same signs of infection on the baby as well. Both died before he could get back home to send a preventive medicine to the child’s father, to whom he had explained their condition. It was uncertain whether the child infected the nurse-mother or the other way around, but the latter seemed more likely. There was also a child brought back to parents from a nurse who had died of the plague; still, the caring mother wouldn’t refuse to take her child in and held it close, which led to her infection, and she died with her child, who was also dead in her arms.

It would make the hardest heart move at the instances that were frequently found of tender mothers tending and watching with their dear children, and even dying before them, and sometimes taking the distemper from them and dying, when the child for whom the affectionate heart had been sacrificed has got over it and escaped.

It would make the hardest heart ache at the moments when tender mothers cared for and watched over their beloved children, even dying in front of them, and sometimes taking the illness upon themselves and dying, while the child for whom the loving heart was sacrificed has pulled through and survived.

The like of a tradesman in East Smithfield, whose wife was big with child of her first child, and fell in labour, having the plague upon her. He could neither get midwife to assist her or nurse to tend her, and two servants which he kept fled both from her. He ran from house to house like one distracted, but could get no help; the utmost he could get was, that a watchman, who attended at an infected house shut up, promised to send a nurse in the morning. The poor man, with his heart broke, went back, assisted his wife what he could, acted the part of the midwife, brought the child dead into the world, and his wife in about an hour died in his arms, where he held her dead body fast till the morning, when the watchman came and brought the nurse as he had promised; and coming up the stairs (for he had left the door open, or only latched), they found the man sitting with his dead wife in his arms, and so overwhelmed with grief that he died in a few hours after without any sign of the infection upon him, but merely sunk under the weight of his grief.

There was a tradesman in East Smithfield whose wife was pregnant with their first child and went into labor while suffering from the plague. He couldn't find a midwife to help her or a nurse to care for her, and both of his servants ran away. He ran from house to house in a panic, but couldn't find any assistance; the most he was offered was a watchman who was stationed at a quarantined house, who promised to send a nurse the next morning. Heartbroken, the poor man returned home, did what he could to help his wife, took on the role of the midwife, and delivered a stillborn child. His wife passed away about an hour later in his arms, and he held her lifeless body tightly until morning, when the watchman arrived with the nurse as promised. As they came up the stairs (he had left the door open or just latched), they found him sitting with his dead wife in his arms, so overwhelmed with grief that he died a few hours later without any signs of infection, simply succumbing to the weight of his sorrow.

I have heard also of some who, on the death of their relations, have grown stupid with the insupportable sorrow; and of one, in particular, who was so absolutely overcome with the pressure upon his spirits that by degrees his head sank into his body, so between his shoulders that the crown of his head was very little seen above the bone of his shoulders; and by degrees losing both voice and sense, his face, looking forward, lay against his collarbone and could not be kept up any otherwise, unless held up by the hands of other people; and the poor man never came to himself again, but languished near a year in that condition, and died. Nor was he ever once seen to lift up his eyes or to look upon any particular object.

I’ve also heard about some people who, after losing their loved ones, became completely overwhelmed with grief. There was one person in particular who was so affected by his sorrow that his head gradually sank into his body, so much so that the top of his head was barely visible above his shoulders. He slowly lost both his voice and his awareness, and his face, facing forward, ended up resting against his collarbone and could only be supported by others’ hands. This poor man never recovered and lingered in that state for nearly a year before he passed away. He was never seen to lift his eyes or look at anything specific.

I cannot undertake to give any other than a summary of such passages as these, because it was not possible to come at the particulars, where sometimes the whole families where such things happened were carried off by the distemper. But there were innumerable cases of this kind which presented to the eye and the ear, even in passing along the streets, as I have hinted above. Nor is it easy to give any story of this or that family which there was not divers parallel stories to be met with of the same kind.

I can't provide more than a summary of these events because it wasn't possible to get the details, especially when entire families affected by the illness were taken away. However, there were countless instances of this happening that were visible and audible as I walked through the streets, as I mentioned earlier. It's also difficult to tell the story of one family without finding similar stories happening to others.

But as I am now talking of the time when the plague raged at the easternmost part of the town—how for a long time the people of those parts had flattered themselves that they should escape, and how they were surprised when it came upon them as it did; for, indeed, it came upon them like an armed man when it did come;—I say, this brings me back to the three poor men who wandered from Wapping, not knowing whither to go or what to do, and whom I mentioned before; one a biscuit-baker, one a sailmaker, and the other a joiner, all of Wapping, or there-abouts.

But now that I’m talking about the time when the plague hit the far eastern part of the town—how for a long time the people there believed they would be safe, and how shocked they were when it struck them as it did; it truly came upon them like a thief in the night when it arrived;—I’m reminded of the three poor men who wandered from Wapping, not knowing where to go or what to do, and whom I mentioned earlier; one was a biscuit maker, one was a sailmaker, and the other was a joiner, all from Wapping or nearby.

The sleepiness and security of that part, as I have observed, was such that they not only did not shift for themselves as others did, but they boasted of being safe, and of safety being with them; and many people fled out of the city, and out of the infected suburbs, to Wapping, Ratcliff, Limehouse, Poplar, and such Places, as to Places of security; and it is not at all unlikely that their doing this helped to bring the plague that way faster than it might otherwise have come. For though I am much for people flying away and emptying such a town as this upon the first appearance of a like visitation, and that all people who have any possible retreat should make use of it in time and be gone, yet I must say, when all that will fly are gone, those that are left and must stand it should stand stock-still where they are, and not shift from one end of the town or one part of the town to the other; for that is the bane and mischief of the whole, and they carry the plague from house to house in their very clothes.

The calm and sense of security in that area, as I’ve noticed, was such that the people not only didn’t leave like others did, but they also bragged about being safe and having safety with them. Many people ran away from the city and the infected neighborhoods to Wapping, Ratcliff, Limehouse, Poplar, and other places, thinking they were going to safe spots. It’s quite possible that this actually helped bring the plague their way faster than it would have otherwise. While I strongly believe that people should flee and empty a town like this at the first sign of such a crisis and that everyone who can should take refuge in time and leave, I must say, once everyone who wants to escape is gone, those who remain and have to face it should stay put where they are and not move from one end of the town to another. Doing so spreads the disease from house to house through their very clothing.

Wherefore were we ordered to kill all the dogs and cats, but because as they were domestic animals, and are apt to run from house to house and from street to street, so they are capable of carrying the effluvia or infectious streams of bodies infected even in their furs and hair? And therefore it was that, in the beginning of the infection, an order was published by the Lord Mayor, and by the magistrates, according to the advice of the physicians, that all the dogs and cats should be immediately killed, and an officer was appointed for the execution.

Why were we ordered to kill all the dogs and cats? Because they are domestic animals that tend to roam from house to house and from street to street, making them capable of spreading the germs or infectious matter from infected bodies, even through their fur and hair. Therefore, at the start of the infection, an order was issued by the Lord Mayor and the magistrates, following the advice of the doctors, to have all dogs and cats killed immediately, and an officer was appointed to carry out this order.

It is incredible, if their account is to be depended upon, what a prodigious number of those creatures were destroyed. I think they talked of forty thousand dogs, and five times as many cats; few houses being without a cat, some having several, sometimes five or six in a house. All possible endeavours were used also to destroy the mice and rats, especially the latter, by laying ratsbane and other poisons for them, and a prodigious multitude of them were also destroyed.

It's amazing, if we can trust their story, how many of those creatures were wiped out. They mentioned about forty thousand dogs and five times that many cats; hardly any house was without a cat, and some had several, often five or six in one home. All possible efforts were made to eliminate the mice and rats, especially the rats, by using rat poison and other toxins, and an enormous number of them were also killed.

I often reflected upon the unprovided condition that the whole body of the people were in at the first coming of this calamity upon them, and how it was for want of timely entering into measures and managements, as well public as private, that all the confusions that followed were brought upon us, and that such a prodigious number of people sank in that disaster, which, if proper steps had been taken, might, Providence concurring, have been avoided, and which, if posterity think fit, they may take a caution and warning from. But I shall come to this part again.

I often thought about the unprepared state of the entire population when this disaster struck and how the chaos that followed was due to a lack of timely actions, both public and private. All the turmoil that ensued led to an enormous number of people suffering, which could have potentially been avoided if the right steps had been taken, with a bit of luck from fate. Future generations might consider this as a warning. But I will revisit this point later.

I come back to my three men. Their story has a moral in every part of it, and their whole conduct, and that of some whom they joined with, is a pattern for all poor men to follow, or women either, if ever such a time comes again; and if there was no other end in recording it, I think this a very just one, whether my account be exactly according to fact or no.

I return to my three men. Their story has a lesson in every part, and their behavior, along with that of some they teamed up with, serves as an example for all poor people to follow, or women too, if such a time comes again; and even if there was no other reason for documenting it, I believe this is a very valid one, whether my account is completely factual or not.

Two of them are said to be brothers, the one an old soldier, but now a biscuit-maker; the other a lame sailor, but now a sailmaker; the third a joiner. Says John the biscuit-maker one day to Thomas his brother, the sailmaker, ‘Brother Tom, what will become of us? The plague grows hot in the city, and increases this way. What shall we do?’

Two of them are said to be brothers: one is an old soldier, but now he's a biscuit maker; the other is a lame sailor, but now he's a sailmaker; the third is a carpenter. One day, John the biscuit maker says to his brother Thomas, the sailmaker, "Brother Tom, what will happen to us? The plague is getting worse in the city and it's spreading this way. What should we do?"

‘Truly,’ says Thomas, ‘I am at a great loss what to do, for I find if it comes down into Wapping I shall be turned out of my lodging.’ And thus they began to talk of it beforehand.

“Honestly,” says Thomas, “I'm really unsure about what to do because I realize that if it comes down to Wapping, I'll be kicked out of my place.” And so they started discussing it in advance.

John. Turned out of your lodging, Tom! If you are, I don’t know who will take you in; for people are so afraid of one another now, there’s no getting a lodging anywhere.

John. Kicked out of your place, Tom! If you are, I have no idea who will take you in; people are so scared of each other these days that there's nowhere to find a room.

Thomas. Why, the people where I lodge are good, civil people, and have kindness enough for me too; but they say I go abroad every day to my work, and it will be dangerous; and they talk of locking themselves up and letting nobody come near them.

Thomas. Well, the people I live with are nice and polite, and they’re kind to me too; but they say I go out every day for work, and that it could be risky; and they’re talking about shutting themselves in and not letting anyone get close to them.

John. Why, they are in the right, to be sure, if they resolve to venture staying in town.

John. Well, they’re definitely right if they decide to stick around in town.

Thomas. Nay, I might even resolve to stay within doors too, for, except a suit of sails that my master has in hand, and which I am just finishing, I am like to get no more work a great while. There’s no trade stirs now. Workmen and servants are turned off everywhere, so that I might be glad to be locked up too; but I do not see they will be willing to consent to that, any more than to the other.

Thomas. No, I might even decide to stay indoors as well because, aside from a set of sails my boss is working on, which I am just finishing, I probably won't get any more work for a long time. There's no business happening right now. Workers and employees are being let go everywhere, so I might be happy to be cooped up too; but I don't think they'd be willing to agree to that any more than to the other.

John. Why, what will you do then, brother? And what shall I do? for I am almost as bad as you. The people where I lodge are all gone into the country but a maid, and she is to go next week, and to shut the house quite up, so that I shall be turned adrift to the wide world before you, and I am resolved to go away too, if I knew but where to go.

John. What are you going to do then, brother? And what should I do? Because I’m almost as lost as you are. The people I stay with have all gone out to the country except for a maid, and she’s leaving next week to close up the house, which means I’ll be left on my own in the world before you. I’ve decided I want to leave too, but I just don’t know where to go.

Thomas. We were both distracted we did not go away at first; then we might have travelled anywhere. There’s no stirring now; we shall be starved if we pretend to go out of town. They won’t let us have victuals, no, not for our money, nor let us come into the towns, much less into their houses.

Thomas. We were both so distracted that we didn’t leave at first; then we could have gone anywhere. There's no movement now; we’ll be starving if we act like we’re going out of town. They won’t sell us food, no, not even for our money, nor will they let us into the towns, let alone into their homes.

John. And that which is almost as bad, I have but little money to help myself with neither.

John. And what's almost as bad is that I have very little money to help myself with either.

Thomas. As to that, we might make shift, I have a little, though not much; but I tell you there’s no stirring on the road. I know a couple of poor honest men in our street have attempted to travel, and at Barnet, or Whetstone, or thereabouts, the people offered to fire at them if they pretended to go forward, so they are come back again quite discouraged.

Thomas. About that, we might manage; I have a little, but not much. However, I can tell you that the road is definitely not safe. I know a couple of honest guys from our street tried to travel, and at Barnet, or Whetstone, or somewhere around there, people threatened to shoot at them if they attempted to go any further, so they came back feeling completely discouraged.

John. I would have ventured their fire if I had been there. If I had been denied food for my money they should have seen me take it before their faces, and if I had tendered money for it they could not have taken any course with me by law.

John. I would have challenged their fire if I had been there. If they had refused to give me food for my money, they would have seen me take it right in front of them, and if I had offered money for it, they wouldn't have been able to do anything to me legally.

Thomas. You talk your old soldier’s language, as if you were in the Low Countries now, but this is a serious thing. The people have good reason to keep anybody off that they are not satisfied are sound, at such a time as this, and we must not plunder them.

Thomas. You’re speaking like an old soldier, as if you're in the Low Countries right now, but this is serious. The people have every reason to keep away anyone they think is not trustworthy, especially at a time like this, and we can't take advantage of them.

John. No, brother, you mistake the case, and mistake me too. I would plunder nobody; but for any town upon the road to deny me leave to pass through the town in the open highway, and deny me provisions for my money, is to say the town has a right to starve me to death, which cannot be true.

John. No, brother, you're misunderstanding the situation and me as well. I wouldn’t steal from anyone; but for any town along the way to refuse me permission to pass through on the public road, and to deny me food even with my money, is to say that the town has the right to let me starve, which can’t be right.

Thomas. But they do not deny you liberty to go back again from whence you came, and therefore they do not starve you.

Thomas. But they don't stop you from going back to where you came from, so they aren't starving you.

John. But the next town behind me will, by the same rule, deny me leave to go back, and so they do starve me between them. Besides, there is no law to prohibit my travelling wherever I will on the road.

John. But the next town behind me will, by the same rule, refuse to let me go back, and so they leave me starving between them. Besides, there's no law stopping me from traveling wherever I want on the road.

Thomas. But there will be so much difficulty in disputing with them at every town on the road that it is not for poor men to do it or undertake it, at such a time as this is especially.

Thomas. But there will be so much trouble in arguing with them at every town on the road that it’s not something poor people can do or take on, especially at a time like this.

John. Why, brother, our condition at this rate is worse than anybody else’s, for we can neither go away nor stay here. I am of the same mind with the lepers of Samaria: ‘If we stay here we are sure to die’, I mean especially as you and I are stated, without a dwelling-house of our own, and without lodging in anybody else’s. There is no lying in the street at such a time as this; we had as good go into the dead-cart at once. Therefore I say, if we stay here we are sure to die, and if we go away we can but die; I am resolved to be gone.

John. Honestly, brother, our situation is worse than everyone else's because we can't leave or stay put. I'm thinking like the lepers of Samaria: 'If we stay here, we're definitely going to die.' Especially since you and I are stuck without a place of our own, and we can’t crash anywhere else. We can't just sleep on the street right now; we might as well jump into the dead-cart right away. So, I'm saying, if we stay here, we’re sure to die, and if we leave, we can only die anyway; I've made up my mind to get out of here.

Thomas. You will go away. Whither will you go, and what can you do? I would as willingly go away as you, if I knew whither. But we have no acquaintance, no friends. Here we were born, and here we must die.

Thomas. You're going to leave. Where will you go, and what will you do? I would just as happily leave as you if I knew where to go. But we have no connections, no friends. We were born here, and here we must die.

John. Look you, Tom, the whole kingdom is my native country as well as this town. You may as well say I must not go out of my house if it is on fire as that I must not go out of the town I was born in when it is infected with the plague. I was born in England, and have a right to live in it if I can.

John. Listen, Tom, the entire kingdom is my homeland just like this town. You might as well say I shouldn't leave my house if it's on fire as to say I shouldn't leave the town I was born in when it's dealing with an outbreak of the plague. I was born in England, and I have the right to live here if I can.

Thomas. But you know every vagrant person may by the laws of England be taken up, and passed back to their last legal settlement.

Thomas. But you know that according to English law, any vagrant can be apprehended and sent back to their last legal residence.

John. But how shall they make me vagrant? I desire only to travel on, upon my lawful occasions.

John. But how will they make me homeless? I just want to keep moving on my rightful business.

Thomas. What lawful occasions can we pretend to travel, or rather wander upon? They will not be put off with words.

Thomas. What legitimate reasons can we claim to travel, or rather roam around? They won’t be satisfied with just words.

John. Is not flying to save our lives a lawful occasion? And do they not all know that the fact is true? We cannot be said to dissemble.

John. Isn't flying to save our lives a legitimate reason? And don’t they all know that this is true? We can't be accused of hiding the truth.

Thomas. But suppose they let us pass, whither shall we go?

Thomas. But if they let us through, where should we go?

John. Anywhere, to save our lives; it is time enough to consider that when we are got out of this town. If I am once out of this dreadful place, I care not where I go.

John. Anywhere, to save our lives; we can think about that once we’re out of this town. If I can just leave this awful place, I don't care where I end up.

Thomas. We shall be driven to great extremities. I know not what to think of it.

Thomas. We’re going to be pushed to our limits. I don’t know what to make of it.

John. Well, Tom, consider of it a little.

John. Well, Tom, think about it for a bit.

This was about the beginning of July; and though the plague was come forward in the west and north parts of the town, yet all Wapping, as I have observed before, and Redriff, and Ratdiff, and Limehouse, and Poplar, in short, Deptford and Greenwich, all both sides of the river from the Hermitage, and from over against it, quite down to Blackwall, was entirely free; there had not one person died of the plague in all Stepney parish, and not one on the south side of Whitechappel Road, no, not in any parish; and yet the weekly bill was that very week risen up to 1006.

This was around the beginning of July, and even though the plague had spread in the western and northern parts of the town, all of Wapping, as I've mentioned before, and Redriff, Ratcliff, Limehouse, Poplar, and in short, Deptford and Greenwich, on both sides of the river from the Hermitage and across from it, all the way down to Blackwall, were completely unaffected; not a single person had died from the plague in all of Stepney parish, and none on the south side of Whitechapel Road, no, not in any parish; yet the weekly death toll had risen that very week to 1006.

It was a fortnight after this before the two brothers met again, and then the case was a little altered, and the plague was exceedingly advanced and the number greatly increased; the bill was up at 2785, and prodigiously increasing, though still both sides of the river, as below, kept pretty well. But some began to die in Redriff, and about five or six in Ratcliff Highway, when the sailmaker came to his brother John express, and in some fright; for he was absolutely warned out of his lodging, and had only a week to provide himself. His brother John was in as bad a case, for he was quite out, and had only begged leave of his master, the biscuit-maker, to lodge in an outhouse belonging to his workhouse, where he only lay upon straw, with some biscuit-sacks, or bread-sacks, as they called them, laid upon it, and some of the same sacks to cover him.

It was two weeks later that the two brothers met again, and things had changed a bit; the plague had worsened significantly, and the number of cases had surged to 2,785 and was rapidly increasing. However, both sides of the river were still managing fairly well. But some people started to die in Redriff, and about five or six in Ratcliff Highway when the sailmaker hurried to see his brother John, clearly distressed. He had been evicted from his lodging and had only a week to get himself sorted. John was in a similar situation; he was also homeless and had managed to get permission from his boss, the biscuit-maker, to sleep in a shed at the workhouse. There, he was only lying on straw, with some biscuit sacks, or bread sacks, as they called them, to rest on and some more sacks to cover himself.

Here they resolved (seeing all employment being at an end, and no work or wages to be had), they would make the best of their way to get out of the reach of the dreadful infection, and, being as good husbands as they could, would endeavour to live upon what they had as long as it would last, and then work for more if they could get work anywhere, of any kind, let it be what it would.

Here, they decided (since all work was over and there was no pay to be found) to do their best to get away from the horrible infection. Being as responsible as they could, they would try to live on what they had for as long as possible, and then look for more work if they could find it, no matter what kind it was.

While they were considering to put this resolution in practice in the best manner they could, the third man, who was acquainted very well with the sailmaker, came to know of the design, and got leave to be one of the number; and thus they prepared to set out.

While they were thinking about how to implement this resolution in the best way possible, the third man, who was well acquainted with the sailmaker, found out about the plan and got permission to join them; and so they got ready to leave.

It happened that they had not an equal share of money; but as the sailmaker, who had the best stock, was, besides his being lame, the most unfit to expect to get anything by working in the country, so he was content that what money they had should all go into one public stock, on condition that whatever any one of them could gain more than another, it should without any grudging be all added to the public stock.

They didn't all have the same amount of money; however, since the sailmaker, who had the most resources, was also the least likely to earn anything from working in the countryside due to his limp, he agreed that all the money they had should go into a common fund. The condition was that if anyone made more money than the others, it should be added to the common fund without any complaints.

They resolved to load themselves with as little baggage as possible because they resolved at first to travel on foot, and to go a great way that they might, if possible, be effectually safe; and a great many consultations they had with themselves before they could agree about what way they should travel, which they were so far from adjusting that even to the morning they set out they were not resolved on it.

They decided to pack light because they initially planned to walk a long distance, aiming to stay as safe as possible. They had many discussions among themselves before they could agree on which route to take, and even by the morning they set off, they still hadn’t made a final decision.

At last the seaman put in a hint that determined it. ‘First,’ says he, ‘the weather is very hot, and therefore I am for travelling north, that we may not have the sun upon our faces and beating on our breasts, which will heat and suffocate us; and I have been told’, says he, ‘that it is not good to overheat our blood at a time when, for aught we know, the infection may be in the very air. In the next place,’ says he, ‘I am for going the way that may be contrary to the wind, as it may blow when we set out, that we may not have the wind blow the air of the city on our backs as we go.’ These two cautions were approved of, if it could be brought so to hit that the wind might not be in the south when they set out to go north.

Finally, the sailor dropped a hint that sealed the deal. “First,” he said, “the weather is really hot, so I suggest we travel north to avoid the sun beating down on us, which could heat and suffocate us. I've heard,” he continued, “that overheating our blood isn't good, especially since we don’t know if there’s an infection in the air. Secondly,” he said, “I think we should go against the wind, since it might blow when we leave, so we don’t have the city’s air blowing on us as we head out." These two suggestions were approved, as long as they could time it so the wind wouldn’t be coming from the south when they set off to the north.

John the baker, who had been a soldier, then put in his opinion. ‘First,’ says he, ‘we none of us expect to get any lodging on the road, and it will be a little too hard to lie just in the open air. Though it be warm weather, yet it may be wet and damp, and we have a double reason to take care of our healths at such a time as this; and therefore,’ says he, ‘you, brother Tom, that are a sailmaker, might easily make us a little tent, and I will undertake to set it up every night, and take it down, and a fig for all the inns in England; if we have a good tent over our heads we shall do well enough.’

John the baker, who had served as a soldier, then shared his thoughts. “First,” he said, “none of us expect to find a place to sleep along the road, and it would be a bit too tough to sleep out in the open. Even if the weather is warm, it could still get wet and damp, and we have a good reason to look after our health at a time like this. So,” he continued, “you, brother Tom, who are a sailmaker, could easily make us a small tent, and I can take care of setting it up every night and taking it down. Who needs all the inns in England? With a decent tent over our heads, we’ll be just fine.”

The joiner opposed this, and told them, let them leave that to him; he would undertake to build them a house every night with his hatchet and mallet, though he had no other tools, which should be fully to their satisfaction, and as good as a tent.

The carpenter disagreed and told them to leave that to him; he would make them a house every night with his hatchet and mallet, even though he had no other tools, and it would be completely satisfactory and just as good as a tent.

The soldier and the joiner disputed that point some time, but at last the soldier carried it for a tent. The only objection against it was, that it must be carried with them, and that would increase their baggage too much, the weather being hot; but the sailmaker had a piece of good hap, fell in which made that easy, for his master whom he worked for, having a rope-walk as well as sailmaking trade, had a little, poor horse that he made no use of then; and being willing to assist the three honest men, he gave them the horse for the carrying their baggage; also for a small matter of three days’ work that his man did for him before he went, he let him have an old top-gallant sail that was worn out, but was sufficient and more than enough to make a very good tent. The soldier showed how to shape it, and they soon by his direction made their tent, and fitted it with poles or staves for the purpose; and thus they were furnished for their journey, viz., three men, one tent, one horse, one gun—for the soldier would not go without arms, for now he said he was no more a biscuit-baker, but a trooper.

The soldier and the carpenter argued about that for a while, but eventually the soldier won, and they decided on a tent. The only concern was that they would have to carry it with them, which would add too much weight to their load in the hot weather. However, the sailmaker had some good luck; his boss, who also ran a rope-making business along with sailmaking, had a small, useless horse at the time. Wanting to help the three honest guys, he gave them the horse to carry their stuff. Additionally, for a small amount of work his man did for him before leaving, he also gave him an old top-gallant sail that, although worn out, was more than enough to make a decent tent. The soldier showed them how to cut it, and following his guidance, they quickly set up their tent and fitted it with poles for support. So they were ready for their journey: three men, one tent, one horse, and one gun—because the soldier insisted on going armed, declaring that he was no longer just a biscuit baker, but a trooper.

The joiner had a small bag of tools such as might be useful if he should get any work abroad, as well for their subsistence as his own. What money they had they brought all into one public stock, and thus they began their journey. It seems that in the morning when they set out the wind blew, as the sailor said, by his pocket-compass, at N.W. by W. So they directed, or rather resolved to direct, their course N.W.

The carpenter had a small bag of tools that could come in handy if he found any work away from home, both for his own support and for the group's survival. They pooled all the money they had into a common fund, and with that, they started their journey. It seems that in the morning when they left, the wind was blowing, according to the sailor's pocket compass, at N.W. by W. So they decided, or rather made up their minds, to head N.W.

But then a difficulty came in their way, that, as they set out from the hither end of Wapping, near the Hermitage, and that the plague was now very violent, especially on the north side of the city, as in Shoreditch and Cripplegate parish, they did not think it safe for them to go near those parts; so they went away east through Ratcliff Highway as far as Ratcliff Cross, and leaving Stepney Church still on their left hand, being afraid to come up from Ratcliff Cross to Mile End, because they must come just by the churchyard, and because the wind, that seemed to blow more from the west, blew directly from the side of the city where the plague was hottest. So, I say, leaving Stepney they fetched a long compass, and going to Poplar and Bromley, came into the great road just at Bow.

But then they encountered a problem. As they set off from Wapping, near the Hermitage, and considering that the plague was raging, especially on the north side of the city, like in Shoreditch and Cripplegate, they felt it was unsafe to go near those areas. So, they headed east along Ratcliff Highway until they reached Ratcliff Cross, keeping Stepney Church on their left. They were worried about going from Ratcliff Cross to Mile End because they would have to pass right by the churchyard, and the wind, which seemed to be blowing more from the west, was coming directly from the area of the city that was worst affected by the plague. So, leaving Stepney, they took a longer route and went through Poplar and Bromley, eventually joining the main road at Bow.

Here the watch placed upon Bow Bridge would have questioned them, but they, crossing the road into a narrow way that turns out of the hither end of the town of Bow to Old Ford, avoided any inquiry there, and travelled to Old Ford. The constables everywhere were upon their guard not so much, it seems, to stop people passing by as to stop them from taking up their abode in their towns, and withal because of a report that was newly raised at that time: and that, indeed, was not very improbable, viz., that the poor people in London, being distressed and starved for want of work, and by that means for want of bread, were up in arms and had raised a tumult, and that they would come out to all the towns round to plunder for bread. This, I say, was only a rumour, and it was very well it was no more. But it was not so far off from being a reality as it has been thought, for in a few weeks more the poor people became so desperate by the calamity they suffered that they were with great difficulty kept from going out into the fields and towns, and tearing all in pieces wherever they came; and, as I have observed before, nothing hindered them but that the plague raged so violently and fell in upon them so furiously that they rather went to the grave by thousands than into the fields in mobs by thousands; for, in the parts about the parishes of St Sepulcher, Clarkenwell, Cripplegate, Bishopsgate, and Shoreditch, which were the places where the mob began to threaten, the distemper came on so furiously that there died in those few parishes even then, before the plague was come to its height, no less than 5361 people in the first three weeks in August; when at the same time the parts about Wapping, Radcliff, and Rotherhithe were, as before described, hardly touched, or but very lightly; so that in a word though, as I said before, the good management of the Lord Mayor and justices did much to prevent the rage and desperation of the people from breaking out in rabbles and tumults, and in short from the poor plundering the rich,—I say, though they did much, the dead-carts did more: for as I have said that in five parishes only there died above 5000 in twenty days, so there might be probably three times that number sick all that time; for some recovered, and great numbers fell sick every day and died afterwards. Besides, I must still be allowed to say that if the bills of mortality said five thousand, I always believed it was near twice as many in reality, there being no room to believe that the account they gave was right, or that indeed they were among such confusions as I saw them in, in any condition to keep an exact account.

Here, the watchman at Bow Bridge might have questioned them, but they crossed the road into a narrow path that leads out of the town of Bow to Old Ford, avoiding any inquiries and making their way to Old Ford. The constables everywhere were on alert, not so much to stop people from passing through but to prevent them from settling in their towns. This vigilance was partly due to a recent report that claimed the poor people in London were suffering and starving for lack of work, leading to unrest and rumors that they would venture into surrounding towns to steal food. I emphasize that this was just a rumor, and thankfully, it remained that way. However, it was closer to becoming a reality than many realized, as just a few weeks later, the desperate poor faced such dire straits that they were nearly driven to raid the fields and towns. As I noted before, the only thing stopping them was the devastating plague that was spreading rapidly; they preferred dying in large numbers rather than marching in mobs for food. In areas around the parishes of St Sepulcher, Clarkenwell, Cripplegate, Bishopsgate, and Shoreditch, where the mob started to threaten, the disease struck with such severity that in the first three weeks of August, over 5,361 people died before the plague peaked. Meanwhile, Wapping, Radcliff, and Rotherhithe were hardly affected, as I mentioned earlier. In summary, although the effective management of the Lord Mayor and justices helped prevent the people's anger from turning into riots and from the poor robbing the rich, the dead carts played a larger role. As I stated, in just five parishes, more than 5,000 people died in twenty days, with likely three times that number being sick during that time. Some recovered, but many fell ill and died afterward. Additionally, I must say that if the mortality reports claimed five thousand deaths, I always believed the actual number was closer to twice that, as there was no reason to trust the reports were accurate, or that they could maintain an exact count in the chaos I observed.

But to return to my travellers. Here they were only examined, and as they seemed rather coming from the country than from the city, they found the people the easier with them; that they talked to them, let them come into a public-house where the constable and his warders were, and gave them drink and some victuals which greatly refreshed and encouraged them; and here it came into their heads to say, when they should be inquired of afterwards, not that they came from London, but that they came out of Essex.

But back to my travelers. They were only questioned here, and since they seemed more like they were coming from the countryside than the city, people were friendlier with them. They talked to them, let them enter a pub where the constable and his guards were, and offered them drinks and some food that really refreshed and lifted their spirits. It also occurred to them to say, when asked later, that they had come from Essex instead of London.

To forward this little fraud, they obtained so much favour of the constable at Old Ford as to give them a certificate of their passing from Essex through that village, and that they had not been at London; which, though false in the common acceptance of London in the county, yet was literally true, Wapping or Ratcliff being no part either of the city or liberty.

To promote this small deception, they managed to get enough favor from the constable at Old Ford to provide them with a certificate stating that they had passed through Essex via that village and that they hadn't been to London. While this was false in the usual sense of London in the county, it was literally true, as Wapping or Ratcliff were not part of either the city or its liberties.

This certificate directed to the next constable that was at Homerton, one of the hamlets of the parish of Hackney, was so serviceable to them that it procured them, not a free passage there only, but a full certificate of health from a justice of the peace, who upon the constable’s application granted it without much difficulty; and thus they passed through the long divided town of Hackney (for it lay then in several separated hamlets), and travelled on till they came into the great north road on the top of Stamford Hill.

This certificate addressed to the next constable in Homerton, one of the neighborhoods in the parish of Hackney, was so helpful to them that it provided not only a free passage there but also a full health certificate from a justice of the peace, who granted it upon the constable’s request without much trouble. They then made their way through the long-divided town of Hackney (which was then made up of several separate neighborhoods) and continued on until they reached the main north road at the top of Stamford Hill.

By this time they began to be weary, and so in the back-road from Hackney, a little before it opened into the said great road, they resolved to set up their tent and encamp for the first night, which they did accordingly, with this addition, that finding a barn, or a building like a barn, and first searching as well as they could to be sure there was nobody in it, they set up their tent, with the head of it against the barn. This they did also because the wind blew that night very high, and they were but young at such a way of lodging, as well as at the managing their tent.

By this time, they started to feel tired, so on the back road from Hackney, just before it connected to the main road, they decided to set up their tent and camp for the first night. They went ahead with this plan, making sure to find a barn or a building that looked like a barn. They searched as best they could to ensure there was nobody inside, then they pitched their tent with the front facing the barn. They did this partly because the wind was really strong that night, and they were still inexperienced at camping and managing their tent.

Here they went to sleep; but the joiner, a grave and sober man, and not pleased with their lying at this loose rate the first night, could not sleep, and resolved, after trying to sleep to no purpose, that he would get out, and, taking the gun in his hand, stand sentinel and guard his companions. So with the gun in his hand, he walked to and again before the barn, for that stood in the field near the road, but within the hedge. He had not been long upon the scout but he heard a noise of people coming on, as if it had been a great number, and they came on, as he thought, directly towards the barn. He did not presently awake his companions; but in a few minutes more, their noise growing louder and louder, the biscuit-baker called to him and asked him what was the matter, and quickly started out too. The other, being the lame sailmaker and most weary, lay still in the tent.

Here they went to sleep, but the joiner, a serious and sensible man who wasn't happy with them lying around so casually on the first night, couldn’t sleep. After trying unsuccessfully to get some rest, he decided to get up. Grabbing the gun, he took on the role of guard for his friends. With the gun in hand, he paced back and forth in front of the barn, which was located in the field near the road but within the hedge. He hadn’t been scouting for long when he heard a noise of people approaching, as if there were many of them, and they seemed to be coming directly toward the barn. He didn’t wake his companions right away, but as the noise grew louder, the biscuit-baker called out to him, asking what was going on, and quickly joined him outside. The other, who was the lame sailmaker and feeling the most tired, stayed put in the tent.

As they expected, so the people whom they had heard came on directly to the barn, when one of our travellers challenged, like soldiers upon the guard, with ‘Who comes there?’ The people did not answer immediately, but one of them speaking to another that was behind him, ‘Alas! alas! we are all disappointed,’ says he. ‘Here are some people before us; the barn is taken up.’

As they expected, the people they had heard headed straight for the barn, when one of our travelers challenged them, like soldiers on guard, with “Who’s there?” The people didn’t respond right away, but one of them whispered to another behind him, “Oh no! We’re all let down,” he said. “There are some people in front of us; the barn is occupied.”

They all stopped upon that, as under some surprise, and it seems there was about thirteen of them in all, and some women among them. They consulted together what they should do, and by their discourse our travellers soon found they were poor, distressed people too, like themselves, seeking shelter and safety; and besides, our travellers had no need to be afraid of their coming up to disturb them, for as soon as they heard the words, ‘Who comes there?’ these could hear the women say, as if frighted, ‘Do not go near them. How do you know but they may have the plague?’ And when one of the men said, ‘Let us but speak to them’, the women said, ‘No, don’t by any means. We have escaped thus far by the goodness of God; do not let us run into danger now, we beseech you.’

They all stopped at that, surprised, and it seemed there were about thirteen of them in total, including some women. They talked among themselves about what to do, and from their conversation, our travelers quickly realized they were also poor, distressed people like them, looking for shelter and safety. Moreover, the travelers had no reason to be afraid of them approaching because as soon as they heard the question, ‘Who goes there?’ they could hear the women saying, as if scared, ‘Don’t go near them. How do you know they don’t have the plague?’ And when one of the men suggested, ‘Let’s just talk to them,’ the women urged, ‘No, please don’t. We’ve made it this far by God’s grace; let’s not put ourselves in danger now, we beg you.’

Our travellers found by this that they were a good, sober sort of people, and flying for their lives, as they were; and, as they were encouraged by it, so John said to the joiner, his comrade, ‘Let us encourage them too as much as we can’; so he called to them, ‘Hark ye, good people,’ says the joiner, ‘we find by your talk that you are flying from the same dreadful enemy as we are. Do not be afraid of us; we are only three poor men of us. If you are free from the distemper you shall not be hurt by us. We are not in the barn, but in a little tent here in the outside, and we will remove for you; we can set up our tent again immediately anywhere else’; and upon this a parley began between the joiner, whose name was Richard, and one of their men, who said his name was Ford.

Our travelers realized that they were decent, sensible people, and, like them, fleeing for their lives. Encouraged by this, John turned to the joiner, his companion, and said, “Let’s encourage them as much as we can.” So he called out, “Hey there, good people,” said the joiner, “we can tell from your conversation that you’re running from the same terrible enemy as us. Don’t be afraid of us; we’re just three poor men. If you’re not sick, we won’t harm you. We’re not in the barn, just in a small tent outside, and we can move for you; we can quickly set up our tent somewhere else.” With that, a discussion began between the joiner, whose name was Richard, and one of their men, who introduced himself as Ford.

Ford. And do you assure us that you are all sound men?

Ford. And can you guarantee that you're all good, trustworthy guys?

Richard. Nay, we are concerned to tell you of it, that you may not be uneasy or think yourselves in danger; but you see we do not desire you should put yourselves into any danger, and therefore I tell you that we have not made use of the barn, so we will remove from it, that you may be safe and we also.

Richard. No, we're here to reassure you so you won't feel anxious or think you're in danger; we really don't want you to put yourselves at risk. So, I'm letting you know that we haven't used the barn, and we will move out of it so that you can be safe, and so can we.

Ford. That is very kind and charitable; but if we have reason to be satisfied that you are sound and free from the visitation, why should we make you remove now you are settled in your lodging, and, it may be, are laid down to rest? We will go into the barn, if you please, to rest ourselves a while, and we need not disturb you.

Ford. That’s really nice of you; but if we’re sure you’re healthy and not dealing with anything troubling, why should we ask you to leave now that you’re settled in your place and maybe even trying to relax? We can go to the barn, if that works for you, to rest for a bit, and we won’t bother you.

Richard. Well, but you are more than we are. I hope you will assure us that you are all of you sound too, for the danger is as great from you to us as from us to you.

Richard. Well, but you are more than we are. I hope you'll confirm that you’re all okay too, because the danger is just as great from you to us as it is from us to you.

Ford. Blessed be God that some do escape, though it is but few; what may be our portion still we know not, but hitherto we are preserved.

Ford. Thank God that some people do escape, even if it's just a few; we still don’t know what our fate will be, but so far we are safe.

Richard. What part of the town do you come from? Was the plague come to the places where you lived?

Richard. Where in town are you from? Did the plague reach the areas where you lived?

Ford. Ay, ay, in a most frightful and terrible manner, or else we had not fled away as we do; but we believe there will be very few left alive behind us.

Ford. Yeah, in a really scary and awful way, or we wouldn't have run away like we did; but we believe there will be very few people left alive behind us.

Richard. What part do you come from?

Richard. Where are you from?

Ford. We are most of us of Cripplegate parish, only two or three of Clerkenwell parish, but on the hither side.

Ford. Most of us are from Cripplegate parish, with only two or three from Clerkenwell parish, but on this side.

Richard. How then was it that you came away no sooner?

Richard. How is it that you left so late?

Ford. We have been away some time, and kept together as well as we could at the hither end of Islington, where we got leave to lie in an old uninhabited house, and had some bedding and conveniences of our own that we brought with us; but the plague is come up into Islington too, and a house next door to our poor dwelling was infected and shut up; and we are come away in a fright.

Ford. We have been gone for a while and managed to stick together as best as we could at the near end of Islington, where we were allowed to stay in an old, empty house. We brought some bedding and supplies with us. However, the plague has reached Islington as well, and a house next to ours was infected and sealed off. We have left in a panic.

Richard. And what way are you going?

Richard. And which way are you headed?

Ford. As our lot shall cast us; we know not whither, but God will guide those that look up to Him.

Ford. As our fate takes us; we don’t know where, but God will guide those who look to Him.

They parleyed no further at that time, but came all up to the barn, and with some difficulty got into it. There was nothing but hay in the barn, but it was almost full of that, and they accommodated themselves as well as they could, and went to rest; but our travellers observed that before they went to sleep an ancient man who it seems was father of one of the women, went to prayer with all the company, recommending themselves to the blessing and direction of Providence, before they went to sleep.

They didn't talk any longer at that moment but made their way to the barn, and after some struggle, managed to get inside. The barn was filled mostly with hay, and they settled in as best as they could and went to sleep. However, our travelers noticed that before they fell asleep, an elderly man, who appeared to be the father of one of the women, led everyone in prayer, asking for blessings and guidance from Providence before resting.

It was soon day at that time of the year, and as Richard the joiner had kept guard the first part of the night, so John the soldier relieved him, and he had the post in the morning, and they began to be acquainted with one another. It seems when they left Islington they intended to have gone north, away to Highgate, but were stopped at Holloway, and there they would not let them pass; so they crossed over the fields and hills to the eastward, and came out at the Boarded River, and so avoiding the towns, they left Hornsey on the left hand and Newington on the right hand, and came into the great road about Stamford Hill on that side, as the three travellers had done on the other side. And now they had thoughts of going over the river in the marshes, and make forwards to Epping Forest, where they hoped they should get leave to rest. It seems they were not poor, at least not so poor as to be in want; at least they had enough to subsist them moderately for two or three months, when, as they said, they were in hopes the cold weather would check the infection, or at least the violence of it would have spent itself, and would abate, if it were only for want of people left alive to be infected.

It was soon daytime that time of year, and since Richard the carpenter had kept watch for the first part of the night, John the soldier took over, and he had the post in the morning. They started to get to know each other. Apparently, when they left Islington, they planned to go north, towards Highgate, but they were stopped at Holloway, where they weren't allowed to pass. So, they crossed over the fields and hills to the east and ended up at the Boarded River. By avoiding the towns, they left Hornsey to their left and Newington to their right, and joined the main road at Stamford Hill on that side, just like the three travelers had done on the other side. Now they were considering crossing the river in the marshes to head towards Epping Forest, where they hoped they could find a place to rest. They didn't seem to be poor, at least not so much that they were struggling; they had enough to get by comfortably for two or three months, and they hoped that the cold weather would help slow down the infection, or at least that its severity would lessen, if only because there would be fewer people left alive to get infected.

This was much the fate of our three travellers, only that they seemed to be the better furnished for travelling, and had it in their view to go farther off; for as to the first, they did not propose to go farther than one day’s journey, that so they might have intelligence every two or three days how things were at London.

This was pretty much the situation for our three travelers, except they seemed better prepared for the journey and planned to travel farther away. As for the first group, they only intended to go a day's journey so they could get updates every two or three days about what was happening in London.

But here our travellers found themselves under an unexpected inconvenience: namely that of their horse, for by means of the horse to carry their baggage they were obliged to keep in the road, whereas the people of this other band went over the fields or roads, path or no path, way or no way, as they pleased; neither had they any occasion to pass through any town, or come near any town, other than to buy such things as they wanted for their necessary subsistence, and in that indeed they were put to much difficulty; of which in its place.

But here our travelers faced an unexpected problem: their horse. Since they relied on the horse to carry their luggage, they had to stick to the road, while the other group moved freely over fields and paths, without worrying about the way. They didn’t need to go through any towns, except to buy the essentials they needed to survive, and even that proved to be quite challenging, but more on that later.

But our three travellers were obliged to keep the road, or else they must commit spoil, and do the country a great deal of damage in breaking down fences and gates to go over enclosed fields, which they were loth to do if they could help it.

But our three travelers had to stay on the road, or they would have to cause damage and really hurt the land by breaking down fences and gates to cross private fields, which they were reluctant to do if they could avoid it.

Our three travellers, however, had a great mind to join themselves to this company and take their lot with them; and after some discourse they laid aside their first design which looked northward, and resolved to follow the other into Essex; so in the morning they took up their tent and loaded their horse, and away they travelled all together.

Our three travelers, however, really wanted to join this group and share their journey; after some discussion, they decided to abandon their original plan to head north and chose instead to follow the others into Essex. So, in the morning, they packed up their tent, loaded their horse, and traveled together.

They had some difficulty in passing the ferry at the river-side, the ferryman being afraid of them; but after some parley at a distance, the ferryman was content to bring his boat to a place distant from the usual ferry, and leave it there for them to take it; so putting themselves over, he directed them to leave the boat, and he, having another boat, said he would fetch it again, which it seems, however, he did not do for above eight days.

They had some trouble getting across the river on the ferry because the ferryman was scared of them. After some talking from a distance, the ferryman agreed to bring his boat to a spot away from the usual ferry dock and leave it there for them to use. So, once they got across, he told them to leave the boat. He mentioned he had another boat and said he would come back for it, but it seems he didn’t actually return for over eight days.

Here, giving the ferryman money beforehand, they had a supply of victuals and drink, which he brought and left in the boat for them; but not without, as I said, having received the money beforehand. But now our travellers were at a great loss and difficulty how to get the horse over, the boat being small and not fit for it: and at last could not do it without unloading the baggage and making him swim over.

Here, by giving the ferryman money upfront, they had a supply of food and drink, which he brought and left in the boat for them; but as I mentioned, he received the payment first. Now, our travelers faced a big challenge trying to get the horse across, as the boat was small and not suited for it: eventually, they had to unload the baggage and make the horse swim over.

From the river they travelled towards the forest, but when they came to Walthamstow the people of that town denied to admit them, as was the case everywhere. The constables and their watchmen kept them off at a distance and parleyed with them. They gave the same account of themselves as before, but these gave no credit to what they said, giving it for a reason that two or three companies had already come that way and made the like pretences, but that they had given several people the distemper in the towns where they had passed; and had been afterwards so hardly used by the country (though with justice, too, as they had deserved) that about Brentwood, or that way, several of them perished in the fields—whether of the plague or of mere want and distress they could not tell.

From the river, they headed toward the forest, but when they reached Walthamstow, the townspeople refused to let them in, just like everywhere else. The constables and their watchmen kept them at a distance and talked to them. They gave the same story as before, but the locals didn't believe them. They claimed it was because two or three groups had already passed through and made similar claims, but they had spread illness among the towns they visited. After that, the locals had treated them harshly (though justifiably, given their actions), and near Brentwood, a number of them died in the fields—whether from the plague or simply from hunger and hardship, they couldn't say.

This was a good reason indeed why the people of Walthamstow should be very cautious, and why they should resolve not to entertain anybody that they were not well satisfied of. But, as Richard the joiner and one of the other men who parleyed with them told them, it was no reason why they should block up the roads and refuse to let people pass through the town, and who asked nothing of them but to go through the street; that if their people were afraid of them, they might go into their houses and shut their doors; they would neither show them civility nor incivility, but go on about their business.

This was a good reason for the people of Walthamstow to be very careful and to decide not to let anyone in whom they weren't completely sure about. However, as Richard the joiner and one of the other men who talked to them pointed out, that didn’t justify blocking the roads and stopping people from passing through the town, especially when all those travelers wanted was to get through the street. If their people were scared of them, they could just go into their homes and shut their doors; they wouldn't treat them with either kindness or disrespect, but would just continue with their own business.

The constables and attendants, not to be persuaded by reason, continued obstinate, and would hearken to nothing; so the two men that talked with them went back to their fellows to consult what was to be done. It was very discouraging in the whole, and they knew not what to do for a good while; but at last John the soldier and biscuit-maker, considering a while, ‘Come,’ says he, ‘leave the rest of the parley to me.’ He had not appeared yet, so he sets the joiner, Richard, to work to cut some poles out of the trees and shape them as like guns as he could, and in a little time he had five or six fair muskets, which at a distance would not be known; and about the part where the lock of a gun is he caused them to wrap cloth and rags such as they had, as soldiers do in wet weather to preserve the locks of their pieces from rust; the rest was discoloured with clay or mud, such as they could get; and all this while the rest of them sat under the trees by his direction, in two or three bodies, where they made fires at a good distance from one another.

The constables and attendants, unwilling to listen to reason, remained stubborn and ignored everything. So the two men who spoke with them went back to their friends to figure out what to do. It was really discouraging overall, and they were unsure of their next steps for a while. But eventually, John, the soldier and biscuit-maker, thought for a moment and said, "Come on, leave the rest of the talks to me." He hadn't been seen yet, so he got the joiner, Richard, to cut some branches from the trees and shape them to look like guns as best as he could. Before long, he had five or six decent-looking muskets that wouldn’t be recognized from a distance. Around the part where the lock of a gun is, he had them wrap cloth and rags they had, like soldiers do in wet weather to keep their gun locks from rusting. The rest of the muskets were camouflaged with clay or mud they could find. Meanwhile, the others sat under the trees as he directed, in two or three groups, where they made fires at a good distance from each other.

While this was doing he advanced himself and two or three with him, and set up their tent in the lane within sight of the barrier which the town’s men had made, and set a sentinel just by it with the real gun, the only one they had, and who walked to and fro with the gun on his shoulder, so as that the people of the town might see them. Also, he tied the horse to a gate in the hedge just by, and got some dry sticks together and kindled a fire on the other side of the tent, so that the people of the town could see the fire and the smoke, but could not see what they were doing at it.

While this was happening, he moved himself and two or three others forward and set up their tent in the lane, in view of the barrier that the townspeople had built. He also assigned a sentry right next to it with the real gun, the only one they had, who walked back and forth with the gun on his shoulder so that the townspeople could see him. Additionally, he tied the horse to a gate in the nearby hedge and gathered some dry sticks to start a fire on the other side of the tent, allowing the townspeople to see the fire and smoke, but not what they were doing around it.

After the country people had looked upon them very earnestly a great while, and, by all that they could see, could not but suppose that they were a great many in company, they began to be uneasy, not for their going away, but for staying where they were; and above all, perceiving they had horses and arms, for they had seen one horse and one gun at the tent, and they had seen others of them walk about the field on the inside of the hedge by the side of the lane with their muskets, as they took them to be, shouldered; I say, upon such a sight as this, you may be assured they were alarmed and terribly frighted, and it seems they went to a justice of the peace to know what they should do. What the justice advised them to I know not, but towards the evening they called from the barrier, as above, to the sentinel at the tent.

After the locals had stared at them intently for a long time, and by all indications assumed they were in a large group, they started to feel anxious, not about them leaving, but about them staying; especially since they noticed the strangers had horses and weapons. They had seen one horse and one gun at the tent, and noticed others walking around the field inside the hedge along the lane with what they thought were muskets slung over their shoulders. I can assure you, seeing this made them alarmed and extremely frightened, and it seems they went to a local justice of the peace to figure out what to do. I don’t know what the justice advised, but later in the evening, they called from the barrier, as mentioned earlier, to the sentinel at the tent.

‘What do you want?’ says John.[1]

‘What do you want?’ says John.[1]

[1] It seems John was in the tent, but hearing them call, he steps out, and taking the gun upon his shoulder, talked to them as if he had been the sentinel placed there upon the guard by some officer that was his superior. [Footnote in the original.]

[1] It looks like John was in the tent, but when he heard them calling, he stepped outside, slung the gun over his shoulder, and spoke to them as if he were the guard assigned there by some higher-up officer. [Footnote in the original.]

‘Why, what do you intend to do?’ says the constable. ‘To do,’ says John; ‘what would you have us to do?’ Constable. Why don’t you be gone? What do you stay there for?

‘What do you plan to do?’ the constable asks. ‘To do,’ says John; ‘what do you want us to do?’ Constable. Why don’t you leave? What are you waiting for?

John. Why do you stop us on the king’s highway, and pretend to refuse us leave to go on our way?

John. Why are you stopping us on the king’s highway and pretending to not let us continue on our way?

Constable. We are not bound to tell you our reason, though we did let you know it was because of the plague.

Constable. We aren't required to explain our reason, although we did inform you that it was due to the plague.

John. We told you we were all sound and free from the plague, which we were not bound to have satisfied you of, and yet you pretend to stop us on the highway.

John. We told you we were all safe and clear of the plague, which we didn’t have to prove to you, and yet you act like you can hold us up on the highway.

Constable. We have a right to stop it up, and our own safety obliges us to it. Besides, this is not the king’s highway; ’tis a way upon sufferance. You see here is a gate, and if we do let people pass here, we make them pay toll.

Constable. We have the right to block it off, and our safety requires us to do so. Plus, this isn't the king's highway; it's a path we allow people to use. You see, there's a gate here, and if we let people pass through, we charge them a toll.

John. We have a right to seek our own safety as well as you, and you may see we are flying for our lives: and ’tis very unchristian and unjust to stop us.

John, we have the right to seek our own safety just like you do, and you can see that we're running for our lives. It's very unchristian and unjust to try to stop us.

Constable. You may go back from whence you came; we do not hinder you from that.

Constable. You can go back where you came from; we’re not stopping you from doing that.

John. No; it is a stronger enemy than you that keeps us from doing that, or else we should not have come hither.

John. No; it's a stronger enemy than you that prevents us from doing that, or else we wouldn't have come here.

Constable. Well, you may go any other way, then.

Constable. Alright, you can go any other way, then.

John. No, no; I suppose you see we are able to send you going, and all the people of your parish, and come through your town when we will; but since you have stopped us here, we are content. You see we have encamped here, and here we will live. We hope you will furnish us with victuals.

John. No, no; you see we can send you on your way, and all the people in your parish, and pass through your town whenever we choose; but since you've stopped us here, we’re fine with it. As you can see, we’ve set up camp here, and this is where we’ll stay. We hope you can provide us with food.

Constable. We furnish you! What mean you by that?

Constable. We provide for you! What do you mean by that?

John. Why, you would not have us starve, would you? If you stop us here, you must keep us.

John. Come on, you wouldn't want us to starve, would you? If you stop us here, you have to take care of us.

Constable. You will be ill kept at our maintenance.

Constable. You will be poorly supported at our expense.

John. If you stint us, we shall make ourselves the better allowance.

John. If you shortchange us, we’ll just find a way to make do better.

Constable. Why, you will not pretend to quarter upon us by force, will you?

Constable. So, are you really going to try to force yourselves on us?

John. We have offered no violence to you yet. Why do you seem to oblige us to it? I am an old soldier, and cannot starve, and if you think that we shall be obliged to go back for want of provisions, you are mistaken.

John. We haven’t harmed you yet. Why do you seem to be forcing us to do so? I’m an old soldier and can’t go without food, and if you think we’ll have to turn back because we lack supplies, you’re wrong.

Constable. Since you threaten us, we shall take care to be strong enough for you. I have orders to raise the county upon you.

Constable. Since you’re threatening us, we'll make sure to be strong enough for you. I’ve been ordered to rally the county against you.

John. It is you that threaten, not we. And since you are for mischief, you cannot blame us if we do not give you time for it; we shall begin our march in a few minutes.[2]

John. It's you who is threatening, not us. And since you're looking for trouble, you can't blame us if we don't give you the chance; we’ll start our march in a few minutes.[2]

[2] This frighted the constable and the people that were with him, that they immediately changed their note.

[2] This scared the constable and the people with him, so they quickly changed their tune.

Constable. What is it you demand of us?

Constable. What do you want from us?

John. At first we desired nothing of you but leave to go through the town; we should have offered no injury to any of you, neither would you have had any injury or loss by us. We are not thieves, but poor people in distress, and flying from the dreadful plague in London, which devours thousands every week. We wonder how you could be so unmerciful!

John. At first, all we wanted from you was permission to pass through the town; we wouldn't have harmed any of you, and you wouldn't have experienced any harm or loss from us. We are not thieves, but just poor people in trouble, escaping the terrible plague in London that is taking thousands of lives each week. We are amazed at how you could be so heartless!

Constable. Self-preservation obliges us.

Officer. Self-preservation requires us.

John. What! To shut up your compassion in a case of such distress as this?

John. What! To silence your compassion in a situation as dire as this?

Constable. Well, if you will pass over the fields on your left hand, and behind that part of the town, I will endeavour to have gates opened for you.

Constable: If you go through the fields on your left and around the back of that part of town, I’ll try to get the gates opened for you.

John. Our horsemen[3] cannot pass with our baggage that way; it does not lead into the road that we want to go, and why should you force us out of the road? Besides, you have kept us here all day without any provisions but such as we brought with us. I think you ought to send us some provisions for our relief.

John. Our horsemen[3] can't go that way with our luggage; it doesn't connect to the road we need to take, so why should you force us off the path? Plus, you've held us up here all day without any supplies except for what we brought. I think you should send us some food to help us out.

[3] They had but one horse among them. [Footnotes in the original.]

[3] They only had one horse among them. [Footnotes in the original.]

Constable. If you will go another way we will send you some provisions.

Constable. If you take a different route, we can send you some supplies.

John. That is the way to have all the towns in the county stop up the ways against us.

John. That's how to get all the towns in the county to block the roads against us.

Constable. If they all furnish you with food, what will you be the worse? I see you have tents; you want no lodging.

Constable. If they all provide you with food, how will that make things worse for you? I see you have tents; you don't need a place to stay.

John. Well, what quantity of provisions will you send us?

John. So, how much food will you send us?

Constable. How many are you?

Officer. How many are you?

John. Nay, we do not ask enough for all our company; we are in three companies. If you will send us bread for twenty men and about six or seven women for three days, and show us the way over the field you speak of, we desire not to put your people into any fear for us; we will go out of our way to oblige you, though we are as free from infection as you are.[4]

John. No, we’re not asking enough for all of us; there are three groups here. If you could send us bread for twenty men and about six or seven women for three days, and guide us over the field you mentioned, we don’t want to cause any concern for your people; we’ll go out of our way to accommodate you, even though we’re just as free from infection as you are.[4]

[4] Here he called to one of his men, and bade him order Captain Richard and his people to march the lower way on the side of the marches, and meet them in the forest; which was all a sham, for they had no Captain Richard, or any such company. [Footnote in the original.]

[4] Here he called to one of his men and instructed him to tell Captain Richard and his group to take the lower path along the edges and meet them in the forest; which was all a trick, as they had no Captain Richard or any such group. [Footnote in the original.]

Constable. And will you assure us that your other people shall offer us no new disturbance?

Constable. And can you promise us that your other people won’t cause us any new trouble?

John. No, no you may depend on it.

John. No, no, you can count on it.

Constable. You must oblige yourself, too, that none of your people shall come a step nearer than where the provisions we send you shall be set down.

Constable. You also need to ensure that none of your people come any closer than where we will drop off the supplies we send you.

John. I answer for it we will not.

John. I promise we won't.

Accordingly they sent to the place twenty loaves of bread and three or four large pieces of good beef, and opened some gates, through which they passed; but none of them had courage so much as to look out to see them go, and, as it was evening, if they had looked they could not have seen them as to know how few they were.

Accordingly, they sent twenty loaves of bread and three or four large pieces of good beef to the place and opened some gates for them to pass through. However, none of them had the courage to even look out to see them leave, and since it was evening, even if they had looked, they wouldn’t have been able to see how few there were.

This was John the soldier’s management. But this gave such an alarm to the county, that had they really been two or three hundred the whole county would have been raised upon them, and they would have been sent to prison, or perhaps knocked on the head.

This was how John the soldier managed things. But this caused such a panic in the county that if there had actually been two or three hundred of them, the whole county would have mobilized against them, and they might have ended up in prison or even killed.

They were soon made sensible of this, for two days afterwards they found several parties of horsemen and footmen also about, in pursuit of three companies of men, armed, as they said, with muskets, who were broke out from London and had the plague upon them, and that were not only spreading the distemper among the people, but plundering the country.

They quickly realized this, as two days later they encountered several groups of horsemen and foot soldiers on the hunt for three companies of armed men, who, as they said, were carrying muskets. These men had come from London and were infected with the plague, not only spreading the disease among the population but also looting the countryside.

As they saw now the consequence of their case, they soon saw the danger they were in; so they resolved by the advice also of the old soldier to divide themselves again. John and his two comrades, with the horse, went away, as if towards Waltham; the other in two companies, but all a little asunder, and went towards Epping.

As they recognized the outcome of their situation, they quickly realized the danger they were in. So, following the advice of the old soldier, they decided to split up again. John and his two friends took the horse and headed off, pretending to go towards Waltham, while the others separated into two groups and made their way towards Epping.

The first night they encamped all in the forest, and not far off of one another, but not setting up the tent, lest that should discover them. On the other hand, Richard went to work with his axe and his hatchet, and cutting down branches of trees, he built three tents or hovels, in which they all encamped with as much convenience as they could expect.

The first night, they all camped in the forest, close to each other but not setting up a tent, so they wouldn't be discovered. Meanwhile, Richard got to work with his axe and hatchet, cutting down tree branches to build three makeshift tents or hovels, where they all settled in as comfortably as they could.

The provisions they had at Walthamstow served them very plentifully this night; and as for the next, they left it to Providence. They had fared so well with the old soldier’s conduct that they now willingly made him their leader, and the first of his conduct appeared to be very good. He told them that they were now at a proper distance enough from London; that as they need not be immediately beholden to the country for relief, so they ought to be as careful the country did not infect them as that they did not infect the country; that what little money they had, they must be as frugal of as they could; that as he would not have them think of offering the country any violence, so they must endeavour to make the sense of their condition go as far with the country as it could. They all referred themselves to his direction, so they left their three houses standing, and the next day went away towards Epping. The captain also (for so they now called him), and his two fellow-travellers, laid aside their design of going to Waltham, and all went together.

The supplies they had at Walthamstow served them very well that night, and as for the next, they left it to fate. They had done so well under the old soldier’s leadership that they willingly made him their captain, and his initial guidance seemed promising. He told them that they were now far enough from London; that they didn’t need to rely on the local people for help just yet, so they should be just as careful not to catch any disease from the locals as they were about not spreading anything to them. He advised them to conserve whatever little money they had; he didn’t want them to consider hurting the locals, and they should try to make the best of their situation with the community. They all agreed to follow his lead, so they left their three houses behind and the next day headed toward Epping. The captain (as they now called him) and his two companions also decided against their plan to go to Waltham and all went together.

When they came near Epping they halted, choosing out a proper place in the open forest, not very near the highway, but not far out of it on the north side, under a little cluster of low pollard-trees. Here they pitched their little camp—which consisted of three large tents or huts made of poles which their carpenter, and such as were his assistants, cut down and fixed in the ground in a circle, binding all the small ends together at the top and thickening the sides with boughs of trees and bushes, so that they were completely close and warm. They had, besides this, a little tent where the women lay by themselves, and a hut to put the horse in.

When they got close to Epping, they stopped, picking a good spot in the open forest, not too close to the highway but still not too far from it on the north side, under a small cluster of low trees. Here, they set up their little camp, which included three large tents or huts made from poles that their carpenter and his helpers cut down and planted in a circle, tying all the small ends together at the top and reinforcing the sides with branches and bushes, making them completely enclosed and warm. In addition, they had a small tent for the women to sleep in and a hut for the horse.

It happened that the next day, or next but one, was market-day at Epping, when Captain John and one of the other men went to market and bought some provisions; that is to say, bread, and some mutton and beef; and two of the women went separately, as if they had not belonged to the rest, and bought more. John took the horse to bring it home, and the sack which the carpenter carried his tools in, to put it in. The carpenter went to work and made them benches and stools to sit on, such as the wood he could get would afford, and a kind of table to dine on.

The next day, or maybe the day after, was market day in Epping, when Captain John and one of the other men went to the market to buy some supplies—specifically bread, mutton, and beef. Two of the women went on their own, as if they weren’t part of the group, and picked up more items. John took the horse to bring everything home, as well as the sack the carpenter used for his tools to carry the goods. The carpenter got to work making them benches and stools to sit on, made from whatever wood he could find, and a table for them to eat on.

They were taken no notice of for two or three days, but after that abundance of people ran out of the town to look at them, and all the country was alarmed about them. The people at first seemed afraid to come near them; and, on the other hand, they desired the people to keep off, for there was a rumour that the plague was at Waltham, and that it had been in Epping two or three days; so John called out to them not to come to them, ‘for,’ says he, ‘we are all whole and sound people here, and we would not have you bring the plague among us, nor pretend we brought it among you.’

They were ignored for two or three days, but then a lot of people rushed out of the town to see them, and everyone in the area became concerned. At first, the people seemed hesitant to approach them; on the other hand, the group wanted to keep people away because there were rumors that the plague was in Waltham and that it had been in Epping for two or three days. So John shouted to them not to come closer, saying, "We are all healthy and safe here, and we don’t want you bringing the plague to us, nor do we want to give the impression that we brought it to you."

After this the parish officers came up to them and parleyed with them at a distance, and desired to know who they were, and by what authority they pretended to fix their stand at that place. John answered very frankly, they were poor distressed people from London who, foreseeing the misery they should be reduced to if plague spread into the city, had fled out in time for their lives, and, having no acquaintance or relations to fly to, had first taken up at Islington; but, the plague being come into that town, were fled farther; and as they supposed that the people of Epping might have refused them coming into their town, they had pitched their tents thus in the open field and in the forest, being willing to bear all the hardships of such a disconsolate lodging rather than have any one think or be afraid that they should receive injury by them.

After this, the parish officers approached them and spoke to them from a distance, asking who they were and what authority they had to set up camp there. John answered honestly that they were poor, distressed people from London who, anticipating the suffering they would face if the plague spread into the city, had fled for their lives. With no friends or family to turn to, they had initially settled in Islington; however, with the plague reaching that town, they had moved further away. Believing that the people of Epping might have denied them entry into their town, they had set up their tents in the open field and in the forest, choosing to endure all the difficulties of such a bleak situation rather than let anyone think or fear that they would cause harm.

At first the Epping people talked roughly to them, and told them they must remove; that this was no place for them; and that they pretended to be sound and well, but that they might be infected with the plague for aught they knew, and might infect the whole country, and they could not suffer them there.

At first, the people of Epping spoke harshly to them, insisting that they needed to leave; that this was not a place for them; and that they were pretending to be healthy, but they could be carrying the plague for all anyone knew, potentially infecting the entire region, and they couldn't allow them to stay there.

John argued very calmly with them a great while, and told them that London was the place by which they—that is, the townsmen of Epping and all the country round them—subsisted; to whom they sold the produce of their lands, and out of whom they made their rent of their farms; and to be so cruel to the inhabitants of London, or to any of those by whom they gained so much, was very hard, and they would be loth to have it remembered hereafter, and have it told how barbarous, how inhospitable, and how unkind they were to the people of London when they fled from the face of the most terrible enemy in the world; that it would be enough to make the name of an Epping man hateful through all the city, and to have the rabble stone them in the very streets whenever they came so much as to market; that they were not yet secure from being visited themselves, and that, as he heard, Waltham was already; that they would think it very hard that when any of them fled for fear before they were touched, they should be denied the liberty of lying so much as in the open fields.

John calmly argued with them for quite some time, explaining that London was essential for their survival—that is, for the townspeople of Epping and the surrounding areas—since they sold their crops there and used those profits to pay their farm rents. He pointed out that being so cruel to the people of London, or to anyone from whom they benefited so much, was unjust. They would surely regret it later and wouldn’t want their actions remembered as barbaric, inhospitable, or unkind, especially when Londoners were fleeing from the world's most fearsome enemy. Such behavior could make the name of an Epping resident despised throughout the city, leading to mobs attacking them in the streets whenever they came to market. He reminded them that they weren’t even safe from being targeted themselves, as he had heard that Waltham already was. He thought it was unfair that when any of them fled in fear before being harmed, they should be denied the right to rest even in the open fields.

The Epping men told them again, that they, indeed, said they were sound and free from the infection, but that they had no assurance of it; and that it was reported that there had been a great rabble of people at Walthamstow, who made such pretences of being sound as they did, but that they threatened to plunder the town and force their way, whether the parish officers would or no; that there were near two hundred of them, and had arms and tents like Low Country soldiers; that they extorted provisions from the town, by threatening them with living upon them at free quarter, showing their arms, and talking in the language of soldiers; and that several of them being gone away toward Rumford and Brentwood, the country had been infected by them, and the plague spread into both those large towns, so that the people durst not go to market there as usual; that it was very likely they were some of that party; and if so, they deserved to be sent to the county jail, and be secured till they had made satisfaction for the damage they had done, and for the terror and fright they had put the country into.

The Epping men told them again that they claimed to be healthy and free from the infection, but they had no guarantee of that; they mentioned that there had been a large crowd of people at Walthamstow who also pretended to be well, but they threatened to loot the town and force their way in, regardless of what the local officials said. There were nearly two hundred of them, armed and camping like soldiers from the Low Countries. They forced the town to provide them with supplies by threatening to take whatever they wanted and acting like soldiers. And since several of them had moved towards Rumford and Brentwood, the area had become infected, and the plague spread to both of those large towns, making people afraid to go to the markets there as usual. It seemed very likely they were part of that group, and if so, they deserved to be sent to the county jail and held until they made up for the damage they caused and the fear they instilled in the community.

John answered that what other people had done was nothing to them; that they assured them they were all of one company; that they had never been more in number than they saw them at that time (which, by the way, was very true); that they came out in two separate companies, but joined by the way, their cases being the same; that they were ready to give what account of themselves anybody could desire of them, and to give in their names and places of abode, that so they might be called to an account for any disorder that they might be guilty of; that the townsmen might see they were content to live hardly, and only desired a little room to breathe in on the forest where it was wholesome; for where it was not they could not stay, and would decamp if they found it otherwise there.

John replied that what others had done really didn’t concern them; they assured everyone they were all part of the same group; they had never been more in number than they were at that moment (which, by the way, was completely true); they had come out in two separate groups but had joined up along the way, as their situations were the same; they were ready to provide any information about themselves that anyone wanted, including their names and addresses, so they could be held accountable for any misbehavior they might be accused of; they wanted the townspeople to see that they were willing to live simply and just wanted a little space in the forest where the air was clean; because if the air wasn’t clean, they couldn’t stay and would leave if it turned out to be otherwise.

‘But,’ said the townsmen, ‘we have a great charge of poor upon our hands already, and we must take care not to increase it; we suppose you can give us no security against your being chargeable to our parish and to the inhabitants, any more than you can of being dangerous to us as to the infection.’

‘But,’ said the townsmen, ‘we already have a huge responsibility for the poor, and we need to make sure we don’t make it worse; we assume you can't guarantee that you won't be a burden to our parish and to the residents, just like you can’t guarantee that you won’t pose a risk to us regarding the infection.’

‘Why, look you,’ says John, ‘as to being chargeable to you, we hope we shall not. If you will relieve us with provisions for our present necessity, we will be very thankful; as we all lived without charity when we were at home, so we will oblige ourselves fully to repay you, if God pleases to bring us back to our own families and houses in safety, and to restore health to the people of London.

“Look,” says John, “we hope we won’t be a burden to you. If you can help us with food for our current needs, we would be very grateful. Just like we managed without charity when we were at home, we promise to repay you fully if God allows us to return safely to our families and homes and restores health to the people of London.”

‘As to our dying here: we assure you, if any of us die, we that survive will bury them, and put you to no expense, except it should be that we should all die; and then, indeed, the last man not being able to bury himself, would put you to that single expense which I am persuaded’, says John, ‘he would leave enough behind him to pay you for the expense of.

‘About us dying here: we want to assure you, if any of us die, those of us who survive will take care of the burial, and you won’t have to spend a dime, unless it happens that we all die; and then, honestly, the last person left wouldn’t be able to bury himself, which would leave you with that one expense that I’m sure,’ says John, ‘he would leave enough behind to cover.’

‘On the other hand,’ says John, ‘if you shut up all bowels of compassion, and not relieve us at all, we shall not extort anything by violence or steal from any one; but when what little we have is spent, if we perish for want, God’s will be done.’

‘On the other hand,’ John says, ‘if you completely close off all compassion and don’t help us at all, we won’t resort to violence or steal from anyone; but when we’ve exhausted what little we have, if we die from lack, then so be it.’

John wrought so upon the townsmen, by talking thus rationally and smoothly to them, that they went away; and though they did not give any consent to their staying there, yet they did not molest them; and the poor people continued there three or four days longer without any disturbance. In this time they had got some remote acquaintance with a victualling-house at the outskirts of the town, to whom they called at a distance to bring some little things that they wanted, and which they caused to be set down at a distance, and always paid for very honestly.

John spoke to the townspeople so calmly and rationally that they left, and even though they didn't agree to let him and the others stay, they didn't bother them. The poor people remained there for three or four more days without any trouble. During this time, they established a distant connection with a nearby food shop on the edge of town, which they called on to bring them some supplies. They always had the items dropped off at a distance and paid for everything honestly.

During this time the younger people of the town came frequently pretty near them, and would stand and look at them, and sometimes talk with them at some space between; and particularly it was observed that the first Sabbath-day the poor people kept retired, worshipped God together, and were heard to sing psalms.

During this time, the younger people in the town often came close to them, standing and looking at them, and occasionally talking to them from a distance. It was especially noted that on the first Sabbath, the poor people stayed together, worshipped God, and were heard singing psalms.

These things, and a quiet, inoffensive behaviour, began to get them the good opinion of the country, and people began to pity them and speak very well of them; the consequence of which was, that upon the occasion of a very wet, rainy night, a certain gentleman who lived in the neighbourhood sent them a little cart with twelve trusses or bundles of straw, as well for them to lodge upon as to cover and thatch their huts and to keep them dry. The minister of a parish not far off, not knowing of the other, sent them also about two bushels of wheat and half a bushel of white peas.

These actions, along with a calm and friendly demeanor, started to earn them the good will of the community, and people began to feel sympathy for them and speak highly of them. As a result, on a particularly wet and rainy night, a local gentleman sent them a small cart with twelve bundles of straw, for them to sleep on as well as to cover and protect their huts from getting wet. The minister of a nearby parish, unaware of this, also sent them about two bushels of wheat and half a bushel of white peas.

They were very thankful, to be sure, for this relief, and particularly the straw was a very great comfort to them; for though the ingenious carpenter had made frames for them to lie in like troughs, and filled them with leaves of trees, and such things as they could get, and had cut all their tent-cloth out to make them coverlids, yet they lay damp and hard and unwholesome till this straw came, which was to them like feather-beds, and, as John said, more welcome than feather-beds would have been at another time.

They were definitely grateful for this relief, especially since the straw was a huge comfort to them. Even though the clever carpenter had made frames for them to lie in like troughs and filled them with leaves and whatever else they could find, and had cut up all their tent fabric to make blankets, they still lay damp and hard and unhealthy until the straw arrived, which felt to them like feather beds; as John said, it was more welcome than feather beds would have been at another time.

This gentleman and the minister having thus begun, and given an example of charity to these wanderers, others quickly followed, and they received every day some benevolence or other from the people, but chiefly from the gentlemen who dwelt in the country round them. Some sent them chairs, stools, tables, and such household things as they gave notice they wanted; some sent them blankets, rugs, and coverlids, some earthenware, and some kitchen ware for ordering their food.

This man and the minister started off like this, setting an example of kindness for these travelers, and soon others joined in, offering help daily. The locals, especially the gentlemen living nearby, provided them with various forms of support. Some sent chairs, stools, tables, and other household items they requested; others sent blankets, rugs, and bedcovers, while some contributed pottery and kitchenware for preparing their meals.

Encouraged by this good usage, their carpenter in a few days built them a large shed or house with rafters, and a roof in form, and an upper floor, in which they lodged warm: for the weather began to be damp and cold in the beginning of September. But this house, being well thatched, and the sides and roof made very thick, kept out the cold well enough. He made, also, an earthen wall at one end with a chimney in it, and another of the company, with a vast deal of trouble and pains, made a funnel to the chimney to carry out the smoke.

Encouraged by this good practice, their carpenter quickly built them a large shed or house with rafters, a proper roof, and an upper floor where they could stay warm, since the weather started to get damp and cold at the beginning of September. Fortunately, the house was well thatched, and the walls and roof were thick enough to keep out the cold. He also constructed an earthen wall at one end with a chimney, and another member of the group, after a lot of effort, made a funnel for the chimney to vent the smoke.

Here they lived comfortably, though coarsely, till the beginning of September, when they had the bad news to hear, whether true or not, that the plague, which was very hot at Waltham Abbey on one side and at Rumford and Brentwood on the other side, was also coming to Epping, to Woodford, and to most of the towns upon the Forest, and which, as they said, was brought down among them chiefly by the higglers, and such people as went to and from London with provisions.

Here they lived comfortably, though simply, until the beginning of September, when they received the troubling news, whether true or not, that the plague, which was spreading rapidly in Waltham Abbey on one side and in Rumford and Brentwood on the other, was also heading to Epping, Woodford, and most of the towns in the Forest. It was said that this outbreak was mainly brought among them by the traders and others traveling to and from London with supplies.

If this was true, it was an evident contradiction to that report which was afterwards spread all over England, but which, as I have said, I cannot confirm of my own knowledge: namely, that the market-people carrying provisions to the city never got the infection or carried it back into the country; both which, I have been assured, has been false.

If this was true, it clearly contradicted the report that later circulated across England, but which, as I mentioned, I can't confirm from my own experience: that the market vendors bringing supplies to the city never caught the infection or transmitted it back to the countryside; both of which, I’ve been informed, are not true.

It might be that they were preserved even beyond expectation, though not to a miracle, that abundance went and came and were not touched; and that was much for the encouragement of the poor people of London, who had been completely miserable if the people that brought provisions to the markets had not been many times wonderfully preserved, or at least more preserved than could be reasonably expected.

They might have been kept alive even more than anyone expected, though not miraculously, that supplies came and went and were not affected; and that was a big boost for the struggling people of London, who would have been completely desperate if the suppliers bringing goods to the markets hadn’t been surprisingly resilient, or at least more resilient than anyone could have reasonably anticipated.

But now these new inmates began to be disturbed more effectually, for the towns about them were really infected, and they began to be afraid to trust one another so much as to go abroad for such things as they wanted, and this pinched them very hard, for now they had little or nothing but what the charitable gentlemen of the country supplied them with. But, for their encouragement, it happened that other gentlemen in the country who had not sent them anything before, began to hear of them and supply them, and one sent them a large pig—that is to say, a porker—another two sheep, and another sent them a calf. In short, they had meat enough, and sometimes had cheese and milk, and all such things. They were chiefly put to it for bread, for when the gentlemen sent them corn they had nowhere to bake it or to grind it. This made them eat the first two bushel of wheat that was sent them in parched corn, as the Israelites of old did, without grinding or making bread of it.

But now these new inmates started to get really unsettled, as the surrounding towns were genuinely affected, and they became hesitant to trust each other enough to go out for the things they needed. This put them in a tough spot because they had little more than what the charitable people in the area provided. However, for their encouragement, some other individuals in the region, who hadn't sent them anything before, began to hear about their situation and offered help. One person sent them a large pig—meaning a piglet—another sent two sheep, and another gave them a calf. In short, they had enough meat, and sometimes they also got cheese and milk, and other items. Their main struggle was with bread, since when the gentlemen sent them grain, they had no way to bake or grind it. This forced them to eat the first two bushels of wheat that were given to them as parched corn, just like the Israelites of old did, without grinding it or making bread from it.

At last they found means to carry their corn to a windmill near Woodford, where they had it ground, and afterwards the biscuit-maker made a hearth so hollow and dry that he could bake biscuit-cakes tolerably well; and thus they came into a condition to live without any assistance or supplies from the towns; and it was well they did, for the country was soon after fully infected, and about 120 were said to have died of the distemper in the villages near them, which was a terrible thing to them.

At last, they found a way to take their corn to a windmill near Woodford, where they had it ground. Afterwards, the biscuit-maker created a hearth that was so hollow and dry that he could bake biscuit-cakes pretty well. This allowed them to live without any help or supplies from the towns. It was fortunate they did, because the area soon became fully infected, and about 120 people were reported to have died from the disease in the nearby villages, which was a horrifying situation for them.

On this they called a new council, and now the towns had no need to be afraid they should settle near them; but, on the contrary, several families of the poorer sort of the inhabitants quitted their houses and built huts in the forest after the same manner as they had done. But it was observed that several of these poor people that had so removed had the sickness even in their huts or booths; the reason of which was plain, namely, not because they removed into the air, but, (1) because they did not remove time enough; that is to say, not till, by openly conversing with the other people their neighbours, they had the distemper upon them, or (as may be said) among them, and so carried it about them whither they went. Or (2) because they were not careful enough, after they were safely removed out of the towns, not to come in again and mingle with the diseased people.

They called a new council, and now the townspeople didn’t have to worry about them settling nearby; instead, several families from the poorer section of the population left their homes and built huts in the forest, just as they had done before. However, it was noted that many of these poor individuals who had moved still got sick even in their huts or shelters. The reason for this was clear: not because they moved into fresh air, but (1) because they didn’t leave soon enough; that is, they waited until they had already caught the illness from openly interacting with their neighbors, and then carried it with them wherever they went. Or (2) because they weren’t careful enough, after having safely left the towns, not to come back and mix with the sick people.

But be it which of these it will, when our travellers began to perceive that the plague was not only in the towns, but even in the tents and huts on the forest near them, they began then not only to be afraid, but to think of decamping and removing; for had they stayed they would have been in manifest danger of their lives.

But whichever it was, when our travelers started to realize that the plague was not just in the towns but also in the tents and huts in the forest near them, they began not only to feel scared but also to consider packing up and leaving; because if they stayed, they would clearly be putting their lives at risk.

It is not to be wondered that they were greatly afflicted at being obliged to quit the place where they had been so kindly received, and where they had been treated with so much humanity and charity; but necessity and the hazard of life, which they came out so far to preserve, prevailed with them, and they saw no remedy. John, however, thought of a remedy for their present misfortune: namely, that he would first acquaint that gentleman who was their principal benefactor with the distress they were in, and to crave his assistance and advice.

It’s no surprise they were really upset about having to leave the place where they were welcomed so warmly and treated with so much kindness and compassion. But the need to survive and the danger to their lives, which they had come so far to escape, took precedence, and they saw no other choice. John, however, came up with a solution for their current predicament: he decided to inform their main benefactor about their situation and ask for his help and advice.

The good, charitable gentleman encouraged them to quit the Place for fear they should be cut off from any retreat at all by the violence of the distemper; but whither they should go, that he found very hard to direct them to. At last John asked of him whether he, being a justice of the peace, would give them certificates of health to other justices whom they might come before; that so whatever might be their lot, they might not be repulsed now they had been also so long from London. This his worship immediately granted, and gave them proper letters of health, and from thence they were at liberty to travel whither they pleased.

The kind, charitable gentleman urged them to leave the Place to avoid being trapped by the severity of the illness. However, he found it difficult to suggest where they should go. Finally, John asked him if, as a justice of the peace, he would provide them with health certificates to present to other justices they might encounter; that way, no matter what happened to them, they wouldn’t be turned away after being away from London for so long. The gentleman immediately agreed and gave them the necessary health letters, allowing them the freedom to travel wherever they wanted.

Accordingly they had a full certificate of health, intimating that they had resided in a village in the county of Essex so long that, being examined and scrutinised sufficiently, and having been retired from all conversation for above forty days, without any appearance of sickness, they were therefore certainly concluded to be sound men, and might be safely entertained anywhere, having at last removed rather for fear of the plague which was come into such a town, rather than for having any signal of infection upon them, or upon any belonging to them.

They had a full health certificate stating that they had lived in a village in Essex long enough that, after being thoroughly examined and isolated for over forty days without any signs of illness, they were considered healthy and could be safely welcomed anywhere. They had actually left mainly because of the fear of the plague that had entered their town, not because they showed any symptoms of infection themselves or had been in contact with anyone who did.

With this certificate they removed, though with great reluctance; and John inclining not to go far from home, they moved towards the marshes on the side of Waltham. But here they found a man who, it seems, kept a weir or stop upon the river, made to raise the water for the barges which go up and down the river, and he terrified them with dismal stories of the sickness having been spread into all the towns on the river and near the river, on the side of Middlesex and Hertfordshire; that is to say, into Waltham, Waltham Cross, Enfield, and Ware, and all the towns on the road, that they were afraid to go that way; though it seems the man imposed upon them, for that the thing was not really true.

With this certificate, they left, though very reluctantly; and since John didn’t want to go too far from home, they headed toward the marshes near Waltham. But there, they encountered a man who appeared to maintain a weir or dam on the river, intended to raise the water level for the barges traveling up and down. He frightened them with grim tales of illness spreading through all the towns along the river and nearby, in Middlesex and Hertfordshire—specifically Waltham, Waltham Cross, Enfield, and Ware, along with all the towns on the way—causing them to hesitate about going that route. However, it seems the man was misleading them, as the stories weren't actually true.

However, it terrified them, and they resolved to move across the forest towards Rumford and Brentwood; but they heard that there were numbers of people fled out of London that way, who lay up and down in the forest called Henalt Forest, reaching near Rumford, and who, having no subsistence or habitation, not only lived oddly and suffered great extremities in the woods and fields for want of relief, but were said to be made so desperate by those extremities as that they offered many violences to the county, robbed and plundered, and killed cattle, and the like; that others, building huts and hovels by the roadside, begged, and that with an importunity next door to demanding relief; so that the county was very uneasy, and had been obliged to take some of them up.

However, it scared them, and they decided to head through the forest towards Rumford and Brentwood; but they heard that many people had fled from London in that direction and were scattered throughout Henalt Forest, which stretched near Rumford. Those people, lacking food or shelter, not only lived in strange ways and endured severe hardships in the woods and fields due to a lack of help, but were also reported to have become so desperate from their struggles that they committed many acts of violence against the county, stealing, plundering, and killing livestock, among other things. Others set up huts and makeshift shelters by the roadside to beg, showing a persistence that was almost demanding for assistance; as a result, the county was very unsettled and had to detain some of them.

This in the first place intimated to them, that they would be sure to find the charity and kindness of the county, which they had found here where they were before, hardened and shut up against them; and that, on the other hand, they would be questioned wherever they came, and would be in danger of violence from others in like cases as themselves.

This initially hinted to them that they could expect the charity and kindness of the county, which they had experienced previously, to be cold and closed off to them; and, on the other hand, they would be questioned wherever they went and could face violence from others in similar situations.

Upon all these considerations John, their captain, in all their names, went back to their good friend and benefactor, who had relieved them before, and laying their case truly before him, humbly asked his advice; and he as kindly advised them to take up their old quarters again, or if not, to remove but a little farther out of the road, and directed them to a proper place for them; and as they really wanted some house rather than huts to shelter them at that time of the year, it growing on towards Michaelmas, they found an old decayed house which had been formerly some cottage or little habitation but was so out of repair as scarce habitable; and by the consent of a farmer to whose farm it belonged, they got leave to make what use of it they could.

After considering everything, John, their captain, went back to their good friend and benefactor, who had helped them before, and explained their situation honestly while humbly asking for his advice. He kindly suggested that they either return to their old quarters or, if that wasn't possible, move a little farther off the road, pointing them to a suitable spot. Since they needed a proper house rather than huts for shelter at that time of year, with Michaelmas approaching, they found an old, rundown house that used to be a cottage or small home but was in such disrepair that it was hardly livable. With the farmer who owned the land's permission, they were allowed to make whatever use of it they could.

The ingenious joiner, and all the rest, by his directions went to work with it, and in a very few days made it capable to shelter them all in case of bad weather; and in which there was an old chimney and old oven, though both lying in ruins; yet they made them both fit for use, and, raising additions, sheds, and leantos on every side, they soon made the house capable to hold them all.

The clever carpenter, along with everyone else, followed his instructions and got to work on it. In just a few days, they made it suitable to shelter them all in case of bad weather. There was an old chimney and an old oven, both in ruins, but they restored them for use. By adding more rooms, sheds, and lean-tos, they quickly turned the house into a space that could accommodate everyone.

They chiefly wanted boards to make window-shutters, floors, doors, and several other things; but as the gentlemen above favoured them, and the country was by that means made easy with them, and above all, that they were known to be all sound and in good health, everybody helped them with what they could spare.

They mostly needed wood to make window shutters, floors, doors, and a few other items; but since the higher-ups supported them, and the community was generally accommodating, plus the fact that they were all fit and healthy, everyone helped them with whatever they could spare.

Here they encamped for good and all, and resolved to remove no more. They saw plainly how terribly alarmed that county was everywhere at anybody that came from London, and that they should have no admittance anywhere but with the utmost difficulty; at least no friendly reception and assistance as they had received here.

Here they set up camp for good, deciding not to move again. They clearly saw how frightened that county was of anyone coming from London, and that they would have a hard time getting in anywhere; at least, they wouldn’t receive the warm welcome and help they had here.

Now, although they received great assistance and encouragement from the country gentlemen and from the people round about them, yet they were put to great straits: for the weather grew cold and wet in October and November, and they had not been used to so much hardship; so that they got colds in their limbs, and distempers, but never had the infection; and thus about December they came home to the city again.

Now, even though they got a lot of help and support from the local gentry and the surrounding community, they faced tough challenges: the weather turned cold and rainy in October and November, and they weren't used to such hardships. As a result, they caught colds and ailments, but they never got seriously ill; ultimately, around December, they returned to the city.

I give this story thus at large, principally to give an account what became of the great numbers of people which immediately appeared in the city as soon as the sickness abated; for, as I have said, great numbers of those that were able and had retreats in the country fled to those retreats. So, when it was increased to such a frightful extremity as I have related, the middling people who had not friends fled to all parts of the country where they could get shelter, as well those that had money to relieve themselves as those that had not. Those that had money always fled farthest, because they were able to subsist themselves; but those who were empty suffered, as I have said, great hardships, and were often driven by necessity to relieve their wants at the expense of the country. By that means the country was made very uneasy at them, and sometimes took them up; though even then they scarce knew what to do with them, and were always very backward to punish them, but often, too, they forced them from place to place till they were obliged to come back again to London.

I’m sharing this story in detail mainly to explain what happened to the many people who suddenly showed up in the city as soon as the sickness let up. As I mentioned, a lot of those who could escape to the countryside did so. When things got so bad, the middle-class people without connections fled to various parts of the country looking for shelter, both those with money to support themselves and those without. The ones with money tended to go the farthest because they could take care of themselves, but those who were broke faced significant hardships and often had to rely on the country to meet their needs. This created a lot of tension in the countryside, and sometimes they were taken in, though even then, people weren’t quite sure how to handle them and were often hesitant to punish them. Instead, they frequently moved them from place to place until they had no choice but to return to London.

I have, since my knowing this story of John and his brother, inquired and found that there were a great many of the poor disconsolate people, as above, fled into the country every way; and some of them got little sheds and barns and outhouses to live in, where they could obtain so much kindness of the country, and especially where they had any the least satisfactory account to give of themselves, and particularly that they did not come out of London too late. But others, and that in great numbers, built themselves little huts and retreats in the fields and woods, and lived like hermits in holes and caves, or any place they could find, and where, we may be sure, they suffered great extremities, such that many of them were obliged to come back again whatever the danger was; and so those little huts were often found empty, and the country people supposed the inhabitants lay dead in them of the plague, and would not go near them for fear—no, not in a great while; nor is it unlikely but that some of the unhappy wanderers might die so all alone, even sometimes for want of help, as particularly in one tent or hut was found a man dead, and on the gate of a field just by was cut with his knife in uneven letters the following words, by which it may be supposed the other man escaped, or that, one dying first, the other buried him as well as he could:—

Since I learned about the story of John and his brother, I've looked into it and found that many sad people, like them, fled into the countryside in every direction. Some found small sheds, barns, and outbuildings to live in, where they received some kindness from the locals, especially if they could provide any satisfactory explanation about themselves, particularly that they hadn't come from London too recently. However, many others built small huts and shelters in fields and woods, living like hermits in holes and caves, or any place they could find. We can be sure they endured severe hardships, so much so that many felt compelled to return, no matter the risk. As a result, those little huts were often discovered empty, and local people assumed the residents had died from the plague, avoiding them for a long time—fearing to go near them. It's also possible that some of the unfortunate wanderers may have perished all alone, sometimes due to lack of assistance, as it was reported that in one tent or hut, a man was found dead. Nearby, a field gate had had the following words crudely engraved with his knife, suggesting that the other man managed to escape, or that one died first while the other tried to bury him as best as he could:—

     O mIsErY!
     We BoTH ShaLL DyE,
     WoE, WoE.
     O misery!  
     We both shall die,  
     woe, woe.  

I have given an account already of what I found to have been the case down the river among the seafaring men; how the ships lay in the offing, as it’s called, in rows or lines astern of one another, quite down from the Pool as far as I could see. I have been told that they lay in the same manner quite down the river as low as Gravesend, and some far beyond: even everywhere or in every place where they could ride with safety as to wind and weather; nor did I ever hear that the plague reached to any of the people on board those ships—except such as lay up in the Pool, or as high as Deptford Reach, although the people went frequently on shore to the country towns and villages and farmers’ houses, to buy fresh provisions, fowls, pigs, calves, and the like for their supply.

I’ve already shared what I discovered about the situation down the river with the sailors; how the ships were anchored offshore, lined up neatly one after another, all the way from the Pool as far as I could see. I've heard that they were positioned in the same way all the way down the river to Gravesend, and even beyond that: basically wherever they could anchor safely from the wind and weather. I’ve never heard that the plague affected anyone on those ships—except for those moored in the Pool or as far up as Deptford Reach, even though the crew frequently went ashore to the nearby towns, villages, and farms to buy fresh food, chickens, pigs, calves, and the like for their supplies.

Likewise I found that the watermen on the river above the bridge found means to convey themselves away up the river as far as they could go, and that they had, many of them, their whole families in their boats, covered with tilts and bales, as they call them, and furnished with straw within for their lodging, and that they lay thus all along by the shore in the marshes, some of them setting up little tents with their sails, and so lying under them on shore in the day, and going into their boats at night; and in this manner, as I have heard, the river-sides were lined with boats and people as long as they had anything to subsist on, or could get anything of the country; and indeed the country people, as well Gentlemen as others, on these and all other occasions, were very forward to relieve them—but they were by no means willing to receive them into their towns and houses, and for that we cannot blame them.

I also noticed that the river workers above the bridge found ways to travel up the river as far as possible, and many of them had their whole families in their boats, covered with tarps and bundles, which they called 'tilts.' They had straw inside for sleeping, and they lined the shores in the marshes, some setting up little tents using their sails, lying beneath them during the day, and returning to their boats at night. I’ve heard that the riverbanks were filled with boats and people as long as they had anything to eat or could get something from the countryside. Indeed, the locals, both gentlemen and others, were very willing to help them during these times, but they were definitely reluctant to let them into their towns and homes, and we can’t blame them for that.

There was one unhappy citizen within my knowledge who had been visited in a dreadful manner, so that his wife and all his children were dead, and himself and two servants only left, with an elderly woman, a near relation, who had nursed those that were dead as well as she could. This disconsolate man goes to a village near the town, though not within the bills of mortality, and finding an empty house there, inquires out the owner, and took the house. After a few days he got a cart and loaded it with goods, and carries them down to the house; the people of the village opposed his driving the cart along; but with some arguings and some force, the men that drove the cart along got through the street up to the door of the house. There the constable resisted them again, and would not let them be brought in. The man caused the goods to be unloaden and laid at the door, and sent the cart away; upon which they carried the man before a justice of peace; that is to say, they commanded him to go, which he did. The justice ordered him to cause the cart to fetch away the goods again, which he refused to do; upon which the justice ordered the constable to pursue the carters and fetch them back, and make them reload the goods and carry them away, or to set them in the stocks till they came for further orders; and if they could not find them, nor the man would not consent to take them away, they should cause them to be drawn with hooks from the house-door and burned in the street. The poor distressed man upon this fetched the goods again, but with grievous cries and lamentations at the hardship of his case. But there was no remedy; self-preservation obliged the people to those severities which they would not otherwise have been concerned in. Whether this poor man lived or died I cannot tell, but it was reported that he had the plague upon him at that time; and perhaps the people might report that to justify their usage of him; but it was not unlikely that either he or his goods, or both, were dangerous, when his whole family had been dead of the distempers so little a while before.

There was one very unhappy citizen I knew who had been visited in a terrible way, resulting in the deaths of his wife and all his children, leaving only himself, two servants, and an elderly woman, a close relative, who had cared for the deceased as best as she could. This grief-stricken man went to a village near the town, though not within the limits of official death records, and after finding an empty house there, he inquired about the owner and rented the place. A few days later, he got a cart, loaded it with belongings, and brought them to the house. The villagers resisted his cart, but after some arguments and force, the men driving the cart managed to get through the street to the house's door. There, the constable stopped them again and refused to let them bring the items inside. The man had the belongings unloaded and placed at the door, then sent the cart away; as a result, the villagers took him before a justice of the peace, meaning they ordered him to go, which he did. The justice instructed him to send the cart back for the goods, which he refused to do; upon this, the justice ordered the constable to pursue the carters, bring them back, make them reload the belongings, and take them away, or put them in the stocks until further orders. If they couldn’t find the carters, and the man wouldn’t agree to take the goods away, they were to pull them out from the door with hooks and burn them in the street. The poor troubled man then fetched the belongings again, crying out and lamenting the unfairness of his situation. But there was no solution; the instinct for self-preservation forced the villagers to acts they wouldn’t have otherwise considered. I can’t say whether this poor man lived or died, but it was rumored that he had the plague at that time; perhaps the villagers spread that rumor to justify their treatment of him; however, it wasn’t unlikely that either he or his belongings, or both, posed a risk, given that his whole family had died from the disease just a short while before.

I know that the inhabitants of the towns adjacent to London were much blamed for cruelty to the poor people that ran from the contagion in their distress, and many very severe things were done, as may be seen from what has been said; but I cannot but say also that, where there was room for charity and assistance to the people, without apparent danger to themselves, they were willing enough to help and relieve them. But as every town were indeed judges in their own case, so the poor people who ran abroad in their extremities were often ill-used and driven back again into the town; and this caused infinite exclamations and outcries against the country towns, and made the clamour very popular.

I know that the people in the towns near London were often criticized for being cruel to those who were fleeing from the outbreak in their desperation, and many harsh actions were taken, as has been noted; however, I must also point out that where there was an opportunity for charity and help without obvious risk to themselves, they were generally willing to assist and support the distressed. But since each town acted as its own judge, the vulnerable individuals who sought refuge during their crises were often mistreated and sent back to their towns; this led to countless complaints and outrage against the rural areas, making the outcry quite widespread.

And yet, more or less, (with) all the caution, there was not a town of any note within ten (or, I believe, twenty) miles of the city but what was more or less infected and had some died among them. I have heard the accounts of several, such as they were reckoned up, as follows:—

And yet, despite all the precautions, there wasn't a notable town within ten (or maybe twenty) miles of the city that wasn't somewhat affected and had seen some deaths among its people. I've heard reports from several places, as they were listed, as follows:—

     In Enfield           32          In Uxbridge        117
     ”  Hornsey           58               ”  Hertford    90
     ”  Newington         17          ”  Ware            160
     ”  Tottenham         42          ”  Hodsdon          30
     ”  Edmonton          19          ”  Waltham Abbey    23
     ”  Barnet and Hadly  19          ”  Epping           26
     ”  St Albans        121          ”  Deptford        623
     ”  Watford           45          ”  Greenwich       231
     ”  Eltham and Lusum  85          ”  Kingston        122
     ”  Croydon           61          ”  Stanes           82
     ”  Brentwood         70          ”  Chertsey         18
     ”  Rumford          109          ”  Windsor         103
     ”  Barking Abbot    200
     ”  Brentford        432                       Cum aliis.
     In Enfield           32          In Uxbridge        117
     ”  Hornsey           58               ”  Hertford    90
     ”  Newington         17          ”  Ware            160
     ”  Tottenham         42          ”  Hodsdon          30
     ”  Edmonton          19          ”  Waltham Abbey    23
     ”  Barnet and Hadly  19          ”  Epping           26
     ”  St Albans        121          ”  Deptford        623
     ”  Watford           45          ”  Greenwich       231
     ”  Eltham and Lusum  85          ”  Kingston        122
     ”  Croydon           61          ”  Stanes           82
     ”  Brentwood         70          ”  Chertsey         18
     ”  Rumford          109          ”  Windsor         103
     ”  Barking Abbot    200
     ”  Brentford        432                       Cum aliis.

Another thing might render the country more strict with respect to the citizens, and especially with respect to the poor, and this was what I hinted at before: namely, that there was a seeming propensity or a wicked inclination in those that were infected to infect others.

Another thing might make the country stricter regarding its citizens, especially the poor, and this is what I mentioned earlier: there seemed to be a tendency or malicious desire in those who were infected to spread the infection to others.

There have been great debates among our physicians as to the reason of this. Some will have it to be in the nature of the disease, and that it impresses every one that is seized upon by it with a kind of a rage, and a hatred against their own kind—as if there was a malignity not only in the distemper to communicate itself, but in the very nature of man, prompting him with evil will or an evil eye, that, as they say in the case of a mad dog, who though the gentlest creature before of any of his kind, yet then will fly upon and bite any one that comes next him, and those as soon as any who had been most observed by him before.

There have been intense discussions among our doctors about why this happens. Some believe it's the nature of the disease itself, which drives anyone infected by it into a sort of fury and a hatred for their own kind—suggesting that there's a negativity not just in the illness that spreads, but also in human nature itself, pushing individuals toward harmful intentions or a malicious glare. This is similar to the behavior of a rabid dog, which, even if it was once the gentlest creature among its kind, will suddenly attack and bite anyone who gets close, especially those who had previously drawn its attention.

Others placed it to the account of the corruption of human nature, who cannot bear to see itself more miserable than others of its own species, and has a kind of involuntary wish that all men were as unhappy or in as bad a condition as itself.

Others attributed it to the corruption of human nature, which cannot stand to witness itself more miserable than others of its kind and has a sort of involuntary desire for everyone to be as unhappy or in as bad a situation as itself.

Others say it was only a kind of desperation, not knowing or regarding what they did, and consequently unconcerned at the danger or safety not only of anybody near them, but even of themselves also. And indeed, when men are once come to a condition to abandon themselves, and be unconcerned for the safety or at the danger of themselves, it cannot be so much wondered that they should be careless of the safety of other people.

Others say it was just a form of desperation, not realizing or caring about what they were doing, and as a result, not worried about the danger or safety not only of those around them, but even of themselves as well. And really, when people reach a point where they give up on themselves and stop caring about their own safety or the dangers they face, it’s not surprising that they would be indifferent to the safety of others.

But I choose to give this grave debate a quite different turn, and answer it or resolve it all by saying that I do not grant the fact. On the contrary, I say that the thing is not really so, but that it was a general complaint raised by the people inhabiting the outlying villages against the citizens to justify, or at least excuse, those hardships and severities so much talked of, and in which complaints both sides may be said to have injured one another; that is to say, the citizens pressing to be received and harboured in time of distress, and with the plague upon them, complain of the cruelty and injustice of the country people in being refused entrance and forced back again with their goods and families; and the inhabitants, finding themselves so imposed upon, and the citizens breaking in as it were upon them whether they would or no, complain that when they were infected they were not only regardless of others, but even willing to infect them; neither of which were really true—that is to say, in the colours they were described in.

But I choose to take this serious debate in a completely different direction and resolve it by saying that I don’t accept the fact. On the contrary, I argue that things are not really as they seem; rather, it was a common complaint from the people living in the surrounding villages against the city dwellers to justify, or at least excuse, the hardships and harshness that have been widely discussed. Both sides can be said to have harmed each other: the city dwellers, seeking to be welcomed and sheltered during tough times and the plague, complain about the cruelty and unfairness of the country folks who refuse them entry and force them back with their belongings and families. Meanwhile, the villagers, feeling overwhelmed by this situation, and the citizens intruding upon them whether they liked it or not, argue that when they were infected, the citizens were not only indifferent to others but even eager to spread the disease—neither of which was truly accurate, at least not in the way they were portrayed.

It is true there is something to be said for the frequent alarms which were given to the country of the resolution of the people of London to come out by force, not only for relief, but to plunder and rob; that they ran about the streets with the distemper upon them without any control; and that no care was taken to shut up houses, and confine the sick people from infecting others; whereas, to do the Londoners justice, they never practised such things, except in such particular cases as I have mentioned above, and such like. On the other hand, everything was managed with so much care, and such excellent order was observed in the whole city and suburbs by the care of the Lord Mayor and aldermen and by the justices of the peace, church-wardens, &c., in the outparts, that London may be a pattern to all the cities in the world for the good government and the excellent order that was everywhere kept, even in the time of the most violent infection, and when the people were in the utmost consternation and distress. But of this I shall speak by itself.

It's true that there was a lot of concern over the repeated warnings given to the country about the people of London deciding to take to the streets, not just for help, but to loot and steal. They ran through the streets unchecked, while no effort was made to secure homes or keep sick people from spreading disease. However, to be fair to the Londoners, they didn't act this way except in specific situations I mentioned earlier, and similar cases. On the flip side, everything was managed with great attention, and the entire city and its outskirts maintained impressive order thanks to the Lord Mayor, aldermen, justices of the peace, church wardens, and others in charge. London can serve as a model for cities worldwide in terms of good governance and the excellent order maintained, even during times of severe infection when people were extremely panicked and distressed. I'll discuss this further on its own.

One thing, it is to be observed, was owing principally to the prudence of the magistrates, and ought to be mentioned to their honour: viz., the moderation which they used in the great and difficult work of shutting up of houses. It is true, as I have mentioned, that the shutting up of houses was a great subject of discontent, and I may say indeed the only subject of discontent among the people at that time; for the confining the sound in the same house with the sick was counted very terrible, and the complaints of people so confined were very grievous. They were heard into the very streets, and they were sometimes such that called for resentment, though oftener for compassion. They had no way to converse with any of their friends but out at their windows, where they would make such piteous lamentations as often moved the hearts of those they talked with, and of others who, passing by, heard their story; and as those complaints oftentimes reproached the severity, and sometimes the insolence, of the watchmen placed at their doors, those watchmen would answer saucily enough, and perhaps be apt to affront the people who were in the street talking to the said families; for which, or for their ill-treatment of the families, I think seven or eight of them in several places were killed; I know not whether I should say murdered or not, because I cannot enter into the particular cases. It is true the watchmen were on their duty, and acting in the post where they were placed by a lawful authority; and killing any public legal officer in the execution of his office is always, in the language of the law, called murder. But as they were not authorised by the magistrates’ instructions, or by the power they acted under, to be injurious or abusive either to the people who were under their observation or to any that concerned themselves for them; so when they did so, they might be said to act themselves, not their office; to act as private persons, not as persons employed; and consequently, if they brought mischief upon themselves by such an undue behaviour, that mischief was upon their own heads; and indeed they had so much the hearty curses of the people, whether they deserved it or not, that whatever befell them nobody pitied them, and everybody was apt to say they deserved it, whatever it was. Nor do I remember that anybody was ever punished, at least to any considerable degree, for whatever was done to the watchmen that guarded their houses.

One thing that needs to be noted, and deserves to be acknowledged, is the careful approach taken by the magistrates regarding the difficult task of quarantining houses. It's true, as I mentioned before, that the closure of homes was a major source of discontent among the people at that time; in fact, it was the only real issue that upset them. Being isolated in the same house as the sick was seen as horrifying, and the complaints from those trapped inside were quite severe. Their cries could be heard in the streets, and while some were harsh enough to provoke anger, more often they called for sympathy. They had no way to communicate with friends except through their windows, where they would make such sorrowful laments that they often touched the hearts of those listening, including passersby. The frustrations expressed sometimes criticized the harshness, and occasionally the rudeness, of the watchmen stationed at their doors. These watchmen often responded rudely and might have even provoked those talking to the families inside. Consequently, around seven or eight of these watchmen were killed in various locations; I’m not sure if I should call it murder, as I can’t get into the specifics of each case. It is true that the watchmen were doing their duty as appointed by legal authority; killing any public officer doing their job is legally termed murder. However, since they were not authorized by the magistrates to be harmful or disrespectful to those under their watch or to anyone trying to help them, when they acted that way, they were essentially acting outside of their official role. They acted as individuals, not as those fulfilling a duty, and thus if they faced consequences for their inappropriate behavior, it was their own doing. In fact, the public often cursed them, whether justly or not, and when incidents did happen to them, nobody felt sorry for them; instead, people often thought they earned whatever happened. I also don’t recall anyone being significantly punished for what was done to the watchmen assigned to guard the houses.

What variety of stratagems were used to escape and get out of houses thus shut up, by which the watchmen were deceived or overpowered, and that the people got away, I have taken notice of already, and shall say no more to that. But I say the magistrates did moderate and ease families upon many occasions in this case, and particularly in that of taking away, or suffering to be removed, the sick persons out of such houses when they were willing to be removed either to a pest-house or other Places; and sometimes giving the well persons in the family so shut up, leave to remove upon information given that they were well, and that they would confine themselves in such houses where they went so long as should be required of them. The concern, also, of the magistrates for the supplying such poor families as were infected—I say, supplying them with necessaries, as well physic as food—was very great, and in which they did not content themselves with giving the necessary orders to the officers appointed, but the aldermen in person, and on horseback, frequently rode to such houses and caused the people to be asked at their windows whether they were duly attended or not; also, whether they wanted anything that was necessary, and if the officers had constantly carried their messages and fetched them such things as they wanted or not. And if they answered in the affirmative, all was well; but if they complained that they were ill supplied, and that the officer did not do his duty, or did not treat them civilly, they (the officers) were generally removed, and others placed in their stead.

What different tricks were used to escape from houses that were quarantined, deceiving or overpowering the watchmen so that people could get away, I have already noted and won’t elaborate on further. However, I will mention that the magistrates did ease the burden on families in many cases, particularly by allowing sick individuals to leave those houses when they wanted to go to a pest-house or other locations; and sometimes they granted permission for healthy members of shut-in families to leave if they confirmed their health and promised to isolate themselves in their new homes for as long as necessary. The magistrates were also very concerned about providing for poor families affected by the sickness—I mean supplying them with basic necessities, including medicine and food—and they didn’t just give orders to the assigned officers but also personally visited those houses on horseback, asking residents through their windows if they were being properly cared for and if they needed anything essential. If the residents said everything was fine, that was good enough; but if they complained about poor supplies or mistreatment by the officers, those officers were generally replaced by others.

It is true such complaint might be unjust, and if the officer had such arguments to use as would convince the magistrate that he was right, and that the people had injured him, he was continued and they reproved. But this part could not well bear a particular inquiry, for the parties could very ill be well heard and answered in the street from the windows, as was the case then. The magistrates, therefore, generally chose to favour the people and remove the man, as what seemed to be the least wrong and of the least ill consequence; seeing if the watchman was injured, yet they could easily make him amends by giving him another post of the like nature; but if the family was injured, there was no satisfaction could be made to them, the damage perhaps being irreparable, as it concerned their lives.

It’s true that such a complaint might be unfair, and if the officer had arguments that could convince the magistrate he was in the right and that the people had wronged him, he would be allowed to stay while they were reprimanded. However, this situation couldn’t really handle a detailed investigation, since it was difficult for the parties involved to be properly heard and respond from the street through the windows, as was the case back then. So, the magistrates usually opted to support the people and remove the officer, as that seemed to be the least problematic and harmful option; if the watchman was hurt, they could easily compensate him by giving him another similar position. But if the family suffered, there would be no way to make it right for them, and the damage could be irreversible, especially when it involved their lives.

A great variety of these cases frequently happened between the watchmen and the poor people shut up, besides those I formerly mentioned about escaping. Sometimes the watchmen were absent, sometimes drunk, sometimes asleep when the people wanted them, and such never failed to be punished severely, as indeed they deserved.

A wide range of these situations often occurred between the guards and the poor people locked up, in addition to those I mentioned earlier about escaping. Sometimes the guards were missing, sometimes drunk, and sometimes asleep when people needed them, and those guards always faced harsh punishments, which they definitely deserved.

But after all that was or could be done in these cases, the shutting up of houses, so as to confine those that were well with those that were sick, had very great inconveniences in it, and some that were very tragical, and which merited to have been considered if there had been room for it. But it was authorised by a law, it had the public good in view as the end chiefly aimed at, and all the private injuries that were done by the putting it in execution must be put to the account of the public benefit.

But after everything that could be done in these cases, closing off houses to separate the healthy from the sick had serious drawbacks, some of which were quite tragic and deserved consideration if there had been space for that. However, it was sanctioned by law, primarily aimed at public welfare, and any personal hardships caused by its enforcement had to be weighed against the public good.

It is doubtful to this day whether, in the whole, it contributed anything to the stop of the infection; and indeed I cannot say it did, for nothing could run with greater fury and rage than the infection did when it was in its chief violence, though the houses infected were shut up as exactly and as effectually as it was possible. Certain it is that if all the infected persons were effectually shut in, no sound person could have been infected by them, because they could not have come near them. But the case was this (and I shall only touch it here): namely, that the infection was propagated insensibly, and by such persons as were not visibly infected, who neither knew whom they infected or who they were infected by.

It’s still questionable whether it really helped stop the infection at all; in fact, I can’t say it did, because nothing spread with more intensity and rage than the infection did at its worst, even though the infected houses were shut up as tightly and effectively as possible. It’s clear that if all the infected people were completely locked away, then no healthy person could have caught the illness from them, since they wouldn’t have been able to get close. But here’s the thing (and I’ll just briefly touch on it): the infection spread subtly, through people who didn’t show any visible signs of being infected, and who didn’t even know whom they were infecting or who had infected them.

A house in Whitechappel was shut up for the sake of one infected maid, who had only spots, not the tokens come out upon her, and recovered; yet these people obtained no liberty to stir, neither for air or exercise, forty days. Want of breath, fear, anger, vexation, and all the other gifts attending such an injurious treatment cast the mistress of the family into a fever, and visitors came into the house and said it was the plague, though the physicians declared it was not. However, the family were obliged to begin their quarantine anew on the report of the visitors or examiner, though their former quarantine wanted but a few days of being finished. This oppressed them so with anger and grief, and, as before, straitened them also so much as to room, and for want of breathing and free air, that most of the family fell sick, one of one distemper, one of another, chiefly scorbutic ailments; only one, a violent colic; till, after several prolongings of their confinement, some or other of those that came in with the visitors to inspect the persons that were ill, in hopes of releasing them, brought the distemper with them and infected the whole house; and all or most of them died, not of the plague as really upon them before, but of the plague that those people brought them, who should have been careful to have protected them from it. And this was a thing which frequently happened, and was indeed one of the worst consequences of shutting houses up.

A house in Whitechapel was quarantined because of one sick maid, who only had some spots and not the full symptoms of the disease, and she recovered. Still, the people living there were not allowed to leave for any reason, not even for fresh air or exercise, for forty days. The lack of fresh air, combined with fear, anger, and frustration from such unfair treatment, caused the head of the household to develop a fever. Visitors came to the house and claimed it was the plague, even though the doctors said it wasn’t. However, the family had to restart their quarantine because of the visitors' report, even though they only had a few days left in their original quarantine. This situation filled them with anger and sadness, and overall, it made their living space even tighter. The lack of fresh air led to most of the family getting sick—each with different ailments, mostly scurvy—except for one person, who suffered from severe colic. Eventually, after several extensions of their confinement, someone who came with the visitors to check on the sick brought the actual sickness with them, infecting the entire household. Most of them died, not from the original sickness they had, but from the plague that those visitors introduced, who should have been careful to keep them safe. This happened frequently and was one of the worst consequences of shutting people up in their homes.

I had about this time a little hardship put upon me, which I was at first greatly afflicted at, and very much disturbed about though, as it proved, it did not expose me to any disaster; and this was being appointed by the alderman of Portsoken Ward one of the examiners of the houses in the precinct where I lived. We had a large parish, and had no less than eighteen examiners, as the order called us; the people called us visitors. I endeavoured with all my might to be excused from such an employment, and used many arguments with the alderman’s deputy to be excused; particularly I alleged that I was against shutting up houses at all, and that it would be very hard to oblige me to be an instrument in that which was against my judgement, and which I did verily believe would not answer the end it was intended for; but all the abatement I could get was only, that whereas the officer was appointed by my Lord Mayor to continue two months, I should be obliged to hold it but three weeks, on condition nevertheless that I could then get some other sufficient housekeeper to serve the rest of the time for me—which was, in short, but a very small favour, it being very difficult to get any man to accept of such an employment, that was fit to be entrusted with it.

Around this time, I faced a bit of hardship that at first really stressed me out and made me quite anxious. However, as it turned out, it didn't lead to any major problems for me. I was appointed by the alderman of Portsoken Ward as one of the inspectors for the houses in my area. Our parish was large, with no less than eighteen inspectors, or as we were called, "examiners"; the people referred to us as visitors. I tried my best to be excused from this job and pleaded with the alderman’s deputy, arguing that I was against shutting houses at all. I felt it would be unfair to force me to participate in something that went against my beliefs and that I genuinely thought wouldn't achieve its intended purpose. The best concession I managed to get was that while the officer was appointed by the Lord Mayor for two months, I would only have to serve for three weeks, provided I could find another reliable housekeeper to take over for the remaining time. In short, that was hardly a real favor, as it was tough to find anyone willing to take on such a job who could be trusted with it.

It is true that shutting up of houses had one effect, which I am sensible was of moment, namely, it confined the distempered people, who would otherwise have been both very troublesome and very dangerous in their running about streets with the distemper upon them—which, when they were delirious, they would have done in a most frightful manner, and as indeed they began to do at first very much, till they were thus restrained; nay, so very open they were that the poor would go about and beg at people’s doors, and say they had the plague upon them, and beg rags for their sores, or both, or anything that delirious nature happened to think of.

It's true that closing up the houses had a significant effect: it kept the sick people confined, who would otherwise have been both very troublesome and dangerous running around the streets with their illness. When they were in a delirious state, they would have behaved in a terrifying way, and they actually started doing that at first quite a bit until they were restrained. In fact, they were so open about it that the poor would go around begging at people's doors, saying they had the plague and asking for rags for their sores, or for anything else their delirious minds could come up with.

A poor, unhappy gentlewoman, a substantial citizen’s wife, was (if the story be true) murdered by one of these creatures in Aldersgate Street, or that way. He was going along the street, raving mad to be sure, and singing; the people only said he was drunk, but he himself said he had the plague upon him, which it seems was true; and meeting this gentlewoman, he would kiss her. She was terribly frighted, as he was only a rude fellow, and she ran from him, but the street being very thin of people, there was nobody near enough to help her. When she saw he would overtake her, she turned and gave him a thrust so forcibly, he being but weak, and pushed him down backward. But very unhappily, she being so near, he caught hold of her and pulled her down also, and getting up first, mastered her and kissed her; and which was worst of all, when he had done, told her he had the plague, and why should not she have it as well as he? She was frighted enough before, being also young with child; but when she heard him say he had the plague, she screamed out and fell down into a swoon, or in a fit, which, though she recovered a little, yet killed her in a very few days; and I never heard whether she had the plague or no.

A poor, unhappy woman, the wife of a well-off citizen, was (if the story is true) murdered by one of these creatures on Aldersgate Street, or nearby. He was walking down the street, clearly out of his mind and singing; people just thought he was drunk, but he claimed to have the plague, which apparently turned out to be true. When he encountered this woman, he tried to kiss her. She was extremely frightened since he was just a rough guy, and she ran from him, but the street was quite empty, so there was no one nearby to help her. When she saw he was about to catch up, she turned and gave him a forceful shove. He was weak, so she managed to push him down. Unfortunately, being so close, he grabbed hold of her and pulled her down too, and getting up first, he overpowered her and kissed her. To make matters worse, after that, he told her he had the plague and asked why she shouldn’t have it too. She was scared enough already, especially since she was young and pregnant; but when she heard him say he had the plague, she screamed and collapsed into a faint or a fit, which, even though she came to a bit, ultimately killed her in just a few days. I never found out if she had the plague or not.

Another infected person came and knocked at the door of a citizen’s house where they knew him very well; the servant let him in, and being told the master of the house was above, he ran up and came into the room to them as the whole family was at supper. They began to rise up, a little surprised, not knowing what the matter was; but he bid them sit still, he only came to take his leave of them. They asked him, ‘Why, Mr—, where are you going?’ ‘Going,’ says he; ‘I have got the sickness, and shall die tomorrow night.’ ’Tis easy to believe, though not to describe, the consternation they were all in. The women and the man’s daughters, which were but little girls, were frighted almost to death and got up, one running out at one door and one at another, some downstairs and some upstairs, and getting together as well as they could, locked themselves into their chambers and screamed out at the window for help, as if they had been frighted out of their wits. The master, more composed than they, though both frighted and provoked, was going to lay hands on him and throw him downstairs, being in a passion; but then, considering a little the condition of the man and the danger of touching him, horror seized his mind, and he stood still like one astonished. The poor distempered man all this while, being as well diseased in his brain as in his body, stood still like one amazed. At length he turns round: ‘Ay!’ says he, with all the seeming calmness imaginable, ‘is it so with you all? Are you all disturbed at me? Why, then I’ll e’en go home and die there.’ And so he goes immediately downstairs. The servant that had let him in goes down after him with a candle, but was afraid to go past him and open the door, so he stood on the stairs to see what he would do. The man went and opened the door, and went out and flung the door after him. It was some while before the family recovered the fright, but as no ill consequence attended, they have had occasion since to speak of it (You may be sure) with great satisfaction. Though the man was gone, it was some time—nay, as I heard, some days before they recovered themselves of the hurry they were in; nor did they go up and down the house with any assurance till they had burnt a great variety of fumes and perfumes in all the rooms, and made a great many smokes of pitch, of gunpowder, and of sulphur, all separately shifted, and washed their clothes, and the like. As to the poor man, whether he lived or died I don’t remember.

Another infected person showed up and knocked on the door of a citizen’s house where he was well known; the servant let him in, and when informed the master was upstairs, he ran up and entered the room where the whole family was having dinner. They started to rise, a bit surprised and unsure of what was going on, but he told them to sit down, saying he had only come to say goodbye. They asked him, "Why, Mr—, where are you going?" "Going," he replied; "I've got the sickness and will die tomorrow night." It's easy to believe, though hard to describe, the shock they all felt. The women and the man's young daughters nearly lost their minds with fear; one ran out one door while another ran out another, some downstairs and some upstairs, and they huddled together as best they could, locking themselves in their rooms and screaming out the window for help as if they were terrified out of their wits. The master, more composed than the rest yet both scared and angry, was about to grab him and throw him downstairs in a fit of rage, but after considering the man’s condition and the danger of touching him, horror took over, and he froze in shock. The poor sick man, equally troubled in his mind as he was in his body, stood there, bewildered. Finally, he turned around and said, "Oh! Are you all disturbed by me? Well then, I’ll just go home and die there." With that, he immediately went downstairs. The servant who had let him in followed him down with a candle but was too afraid to pass him and open the door, so he stood on the stairs, watching to see what he would do. The man opened the door, stepped outside, and slammed the door behind him. It took a while for the family to recover from the scare, but since nothing bad happened, they’ve had the chance to talk about it later with great relief. Although the man had left, it took them some time—actually, as I heard, several days—before they felt normal again; they didn’t move around the house confidently until they burned a variety of fumes and perfumes in all the rooms and created plenty of smoke from pitch, gunpowder, and sulfur, each separately, and washed their clothes and so on. As for the poor man, whether he lived or died, I don't remember.

It is most certain that, if by the shutting up of houses the sick had not been confined, multitudes who in the height of their fever were delirious and distracted would have been continually running up and down the streets; and even as it was a very great number did so, and offered all sorts of violence to those they met, even just as a mad dog runs on and bites at every one he meets; nor can I doubt but that, should one of those infected, diseased creatures have bitten any man or woman while the frenzy of the distemper was upon them, they, I mean the person so wounded, would as certainly have been incurably infected as one that was sick before, and had the tokens upon him.

It’s very clear that if the sick hadn’t been confined in their homes, many people who were feverish and confused would have been running through the streets. And even as it was, a significant number did just that, causing all kinds of violence to anyone they encountered, just like a rabid dog that bites at everyone it sees. I have no doubt that if one of those infected individuals had bitten someone while they were in a frenzy, that person would certainly become incurably infected, just like someone who was already showing symptoms.

I heard of one infected creature who, running out of his bed in his shirt in the anguish and agony of his swellings, of which he had three upon him, got his shoes on and went to put on his coat; but the nurse resisting, and snatching the coat from him, he threw her down, ran over her, ran downstairs and into the street, directly to the Thames in his shirt; the nurse running after him, and calling to the watch to stop him; but the watchman, frighted at the man, and afraid to touch him, let him go on; upon which he ran down to the Stillyard stairs, threw away his shirt, and plunged into the Thames, and, being a good swimmer, swam quite over the river; and the tide being coming in, as they call it (that is, running westward) he reached the land not till he came about the Falcon stairs, where landing, and finding no people there, it being in the night, he ran about the streets there, naked as he was, for a good while, when, it being by that time high water, he takes the river again, and swam back to the Stillyard, landed, ran up the streets again to his own house, knocking at the door, went up the stairs and into his bed again; and that this terrible experiment cured him of the plague, that is to say, that the violent motion of his arms and legs stretched the parts where the swellings he had upon him were, that is to say, under his arms and his groin, and caused them to ripen and break; and that the cold of the water abated the fever in his blood.

I heard about a sick guy who, rushing out of his bed in just his shirt, overwhelmed by the pain of his three swellings, put on his shoes and tried to grab his coat. But the nurse stopped him, pulling the coat away, so he shoved her aside, ran over her, dashed downstairs, and into the street, heading straight for the Thames in his shirt. The nurse chased after him, yelling for the watchmen to stop him, but they were too scared to touch him and let him go. He ran to the Stillyard stairs, tossed away his shirt, and jumped into the Thames. Being a strong swimmer, he made it across the river. Since the tide was coming in, he didn’t reach the shore until he got to the Falcon stairs. There, finding no one around at night, he wandered the streets naked for a while. When it was high tide, he jumped back into the river, swam back to the Stillyard, landed, and ran up the streets to his house, knocking on the door, going upstairs, and getting back into bed. This wild experience cured him of the plague because the intense movement of his arms and legs stretched the areas where his swellings were—under his arms and in his groin—helping them to mature and burst, and the cold water reduced the fever in his blood.

I have only to add that I do not relate this any more than some of the other, as a fact within my own knowledge, so as that I can vouch the truth of them, and especially that of the man being cured by the extravagant adventure, which I confess I do not think very possible; but it may serve to confirm the many desperate things which the distressed people falling into deliriums, and what we call light-headedness, were frequently run upon at that time, and how infinitely more such there would have been if such people had not been confined by the shutting up of houses; and this I take to be the best, if not the only good thing which was performed by that severe method.

I just want to add that I'm not sharing this as a fact I definitely know, so I can't guarantee its truth, especially about the man who was cured by the outrageous adventure, which I honestly think is unlikely. However, it might help illustrate the many desperate actions that distressed people experiencing delirium and what we now call light-headedness often took at that time. There would have been even more of such incidents if those individuals hadn’t been confined by the lockdowns, and I believe that’s the only good—if not the best—thing that came from that harsh approach.

On the other hand, the complaints and the murmurings were very bitter against the thing itself. It would pierce the hearts of all that came by to hear the piteous cries of those infected people, who, being thus out of their understandings by the violence of their pain or the heat of their blood, were either shut in or perhaps tied in their beds and chairs, to prevent their doing themselves hurt—and who would make a dreadful outcry at their being confined, and at their being not permitted to die at large, as they called it, and as they would have done before.

On the other hand, the complaints and murmurs were really intense against the situation itself. It would pierce the hearts of everyone who came to hear the heartbreaking cries of those suffering individuals, who, due to the severity of their pain or the fever in their blood, were either locked away or maybe tied to their beds and chairs to stop them from hurting themselves—and who would let out a terrible outcry about being confined and not allowed to die freely, as they put it, the way they would have done before.

This running of distempered people about the streets was very dismal, and the magistrates did their utmost to prevent it; but as it was generally in the night and always sudden when such attempts were made, the officers could not be at hand to prevent it; and even when any got out in the day, the officers appointed did not care to meddle with them, because, as they were all grievously infected, to be sure, when they were come to that height, so they were more than ordinarily infectious, and it was one of the most dangerous things that could be to touch them. On the other hand, they generally ran on, not knowing what they did, till they dropped down stark dead, or till they had exhausted their spirits so as that they would fall and then die in perhaps half-an-hour or an hour; and, which was most piteous to hear, they were sure to come to themselves entirely in that half-hour or hour, and then to make most grievous and piercing cries and lamentations in the deep, afflicting sense of the condition they were in. This was much of it before the order for shutting up of houses was strictly put in execution, for at first the watchmen were not so vigorous and severe as they were afterward in the keeping the people in; that is to say, before they were (I mean some of them) severely punished for their neglect, failing in their duty, and letting people who were under their care slip away, or conniving at their going abroad, whether sick or well. But after they saw the officers appointed to examine into their conduct were resolved to have them do their duty or be punished for the omission, they were more exact, and the people were strictly restrained; which was a thing they took so ill and bore so impatiently that their discontents can hardly be described. But there was an absolute necessity for it, that must be confessed, unless some other measures had been timely entered upon, and it was too late for that.

The sight of sick people wandering the streets was very gloomy, and the authorities did everything they could to stop it. However, since it usually happened at night and was always sudden, the officers couldn’t be there to intervene. Even when some were out during the day, the officials didn’t want to get involved because they were all seriously infected, which made them exceptionally contagious. It was extremely dangerous to touch them. On the other hand, these individuals often ran around, unaware of their actions, until they collapsed and died, or until they drained all their energy and fell, sometimes surviving for just half an hour to an hour before dying. Tragically, they would regain awareness in that time, only to let out heartbreaking cries and wails, deeply aware of their dire situation. This largely happened before the order to quarantine households was strictly enforced. Initially, the watchmen weren’t as strict and tough in keeping people confined. Some of them faced strict punishment for failing in their duties, allowing people in their care to escape or looking the other way while they went outside, whether they were sick or healthy. But once they realized that the officers responsible for monitoring them were determined to have them do their jobs or face consequences, they became stricter, and people were tightly controlled. This caused significant frustration and unrest among the citizens, which was difficult to describe. However, it was absolutely necessary, which must be acknowledged, as there was no time left to pursue other options.

Had not this particular (of the sick being restrained as above) been our case at that time, London would have been the most dreadful place that ever was in the world; there would, for aught I know, have as many people died in the streets as died in their houses; for when the distemper was at its height it generally made them raving and delirious, and when they were so they would never be persuaded to keep in their beds but by force; and many who were not tied threw themselves out of windows when they found they could not get leave to go out of their doors.

If we hadn't been in this specific situation (with the sick being restrained as mentioned), London would have been the most terrifying place in the world; for all I know, just as many people would have died in the streets as in their homes. When the illness was at its worst, it usually made people raving mad and delirious, and when they were like that, they could only be convinced to stay in bed by force. Many who weren't tied down would throw themselves out of windows when they realized they weren't allowed to go out their doors.

It was for want of people conversing one with another, in this time of calamity, that it was impossible any particular person could come at the knowledge of all the extraordinary cases that occurred in different families; and particularly I believe it was never known to this day how many people in their deliriums drowned themselves in the Thames, and in the river which runs from the marshes by Hackney, which we generally called Ware River, or Hackney River. As to those which were set down in the weekly bill, they were indeed few; nor could it be known of any of those whether they drowned themselves by accident or not. But I believe I might reckon up more who within the compass of my knowledge or observation really drowned themselves in that year, than are put down in the bill of all put together: for many of the bodies were never found who yet were known to be lost; and the like in other methods of self-destruction. There was also one man in or about Whitecross Street burned himself to death in his bed; some said it was done by himself, others that it was by the treachery of the nurse that attended him; but that he had the plague upon him was agreed by all.

It was due to the lack of people talking to each other during this time of crisis that it was impossible for any one person to know about all the unusual cases happening in different families. I believe it’s never been figured out how many people, in their delirium, drowned themselves in the Thames or in the river that flows from the marshes near Hackney, which we generally call the Ware River or Hackney River. As for those recorded in the weekly report, there were indeed very few, and it couldn’t be determined for any of them whether they drowned themselves by accident or not. However, I think I could list more individuals who, within my knowledge or observation, actually took their own lives by drowning that year than were recorded in the report altogether. Many bodies were never found despite being known to be missing, and similar situations occurred with other methods of self-harm. There was also a man in or around Whitecross Street who burned himself to death in his bed; some said he did it himself, while others claimed it was due to the negligence of the nurse taking care of him. However, everyone agreed he had the plague.

It was a merciful disposition of Providence also, and which I have many times thought of at that time, that no fires, or no considerable ones at least, happened in the city during that year, which, if it had been otherwise, would have been very dreadful; and either the people must have let them alone unquenched, or have come together in great crowds and throngs, unconcerned at the danger of the infection, not concerned at the houses they went into, at the goods they handled, or at the persons or the people they came among. But so it was, that excepting that in Cripplegate parish, and two or three little eruptions of fires, which were presently extinguished, there was no disaster of that kind happened in the whole year. They told us a story of a house in a place called Swan Alley, passing from Goswell Street, near the end of Old Street, into St John Street, that a family was infected there in so terrible a manner that every one of the house died. The last person lay dead on the floor, and, as it is supposed, had lain herself all along to die just before the fire; the fire, it seems, had fallen from its place, being of wood, and had taken hold of the boards and the joists they lay on, and burnt as far as just to the body, but had not taken hold of the dead body (though she had little more than her shift on) and had gone out of itself, not burning the rest of the house, though it was a slight timber house. How true this might be I do not determine, but the city being to suffer severely the next year by fire, this year it felt very little of that calamity.

It was a kind decision by Providence, and something I've thought about a lot since then, that no significant fires occurred in the city that year. If things had been different, it could have been really terrible; people would have either left the fires to burn or gathered in large crowds, ignoring the risk of infection and not worrying about the houses they entered, the things they touched, or the people they met. But as it turned out, apart from a fire in Cripplegate parish and a few small flare-ups that were quickly put out, there were no major disasters of that sort all year. They shared a story about a house in Swan Alley, which runs from Goswell Street near the end of Old Street into St John Street, where a family was infected so severely that everyone in the house died. The last person was found dead on the floor, having apparently lay down to die just before the fire started. The fire, which was made of wood, had spread to the floorboards and joists beneath her but stopped right at her body, which was mostly covered by her nightgown. It eventually went out on its own, without burning the rest of the house, even though it was a flimsy timber structure. I can't say how true this story is, but the city would face a serious fire the following year, while this year saw very little of that disaster.

Indeed, considering the deliriums which the agony threw people into, and how I have mentioned in their madness, when they were alone, they did many desperate things, it was very strange there were no more disasters of that kind.

Indeed, given the frenzy that the suffering pushed people into, and how I noted in their madness, when they were isolated, they did many reckless things, it was quite strange that there weren't more disasters like that.

It has been frequently asked me, and I cannot say that I ever knew how to give a direct answer to it, how it came to pass that so many infected people appeared abroad in the streets at the same time that the houses which were infected were so vigilantly searched, and all of them shut up and guarded as they were.

I've often been asked, and I honestly don’t know how to give a straightforward answer, about how so many infected people ended up in the streets at the same time that the infected houses were being carefully checked and all of them locked up and monitored like they were.

I confess I know not what answer to give to this, unless it be this: that in so great and populous a city as this is it was impossible to discover every house that was infected as soon as it was so, or to shut up all the houses that were infected; so that people had the liberty of going about the streets, even where they pleased, unless they were known to belong to such-and-such infected houses.

I admit I don't know what answer to give to this, except to say that in a large and crowded city like this, it was impossible to identify every house that was infected right away or to quarantine all the infected houses. People had the freedom to walk around the streets wherever they wanted, unless they were known to belong to certain infected houses.

It is true that, as several physicians told my Lord Mayor, the fury of the contagion was such at some particular times, and people sickened so fast and died so soon, that it was impossible, and indeed to no purpose, to go about to inquire who was sick and who was well, or to shut them up with such exactness as the thing required, almost every house in a whole street being infected, and in many places every person in some of the houses; and that which was still worse, by the time that the houses were known to be infected, most of the persons infected would be stone dead, and the rest run away for fear of being shut up; so that it was to very small purpose to call them infected houses and shut them up, the infection having ravaged and taken its leave of the house before it was really known that the family was any way touched.

It's true that, as several doctors told my Lord Mayor, the outbreak was so intense at certain times, and people got sick so quickly and died so soon, that it was impossible and really pointless to try to figure out who was sick and who was healthy, or to isolate them with the precision that was needed. Almost every house in a whole street was infected, and in many places, everyone in some of the houses was affected. What was even worse was that by the time the houses were identified as infected, most of the people inside would be dead, and the rest would have fled in fear of being quarantined. Therefore, labeling them as infected houses and isolating them was nearly useless, as the infection had already run its course and left the house before anyone even knew the family was affected.

This might be sufficient to convince any reasonable person that as it was not in the power of the magistrates or of any human methods of policy, to prevent the spreading the infection, so that this way of shutting up of houses was perfectly insufficient for that end. Indeed it seemed to have no manner of public good in it, equal or proportionable to the grievous burden that it was to the particular families that were so shut up; and, as far as I was employed by the public in directing that severity, I frequently found occasion to see that it was incapable of answering the end. For example, as I was desired, as a visitor or examiner, to inquire into the particulars of several families which were infected, we scarce came to any house where the plague had visibly appeared in the family but that some of the family were fled and gone. The magistrates would resent this, and charge the examiners with being remiss in their examination or inspection. But by that means houses were long infected before it was known. Now, as I was in this dangerous office but half the appointed time, which was two months, it was long enough to inform myself that we were no way capable of coming at the knowledge of the true state of any family but by inquiring at the door or of the neighbours. As for going into every house to search, that was a part no authority would offer to impose on the inhabitants, or any citizen would undertake: for it would have been exposing us to certain infection and death, and to the ruin of our own families as well as of ourselves; nor would any citizen of probity, and that could be depended upon, have stayed in the town if they had been made liable to such a severity.

This might be enough to convince any reasonable person that since it was beyond the power of the authorities or any human policies to stop the spread of the infection, this method of quarantining houses was completely ineffective. In fact, it didn't seem to provide any public benefit that could match the significant burden it placed on the individual families affected. As far as I was involved in enforcing this strict measure, I often found that it failed to achieve its purpose. For example, when I was asked to investigate various families that were infected, we barely visited any home where the plague had shown up without finding that some family members had fled. The authorities would take issue with this and blame the inspectors for not doing their job properly. However, this meant that houses could remain infected for long periods without anyone knowing. Since I was in this risky position for only half the designated time, which was two months, it was long enough for me to realize that we could only learn the true situation of any family by asking at the door or consulting the neighbors. Going into every house to search was something no authority could impose on the residents, nor would any trustworthy citizen have volunteered for such a task, as it would put us at risk of infection and death, threatening both our lives and those of our families. No reputable citizen would stay in the town if they faced such harsh consequences.

Seeing then that we could come at the certainty of things by no method but that of inquiry of the neighbours or of the family, and on that we could not justly depend, it was not possible but that the uncertainty of this matter would remain as above.

Seeing that the only way to truly understand things was to ask our neighbors or family, and since we couldn't really rely on that, it was clear that the uncertainty of the situation would stay as it was.

It is true masters of families were bound by the order to give notice to the examiner of the place wherein he lived, within two hours after he should discover it, of any person being sick in his house (that is to say, having signs of the infection)—but they found so many ways to evade this and excuse their negligence that they seldom gave that notice till they had taken measures to have every one escape out of the house who had a mind to escape, whether they were sick or sound; and while this was so, it is easy to see that the shutting up of houses was no way to be depended upon as a sufficient method for putting a stop to the infection because, as I have said elsewhere, many of those that so went out of those infected houses had the plague really upon them, though they might really think themselves sound. And some of these were the people that walked the streets till they fell down dead, not that they were suddenly struck with the distemper as with a bullet that killed with the stroke, but that they really had the infection in their blood long before; only, that as it preyed secretly on the vitals, it appeared not till it seized the heart with a mortal power, and the patient died in a moment, as with a sudden fainting or an apoplectic fit.

It's true that heads of households were required to notify the examiner of their residence within two hours after discovering someone sick in their home (meaning showing signs of the infection). However, they found so many ways to evade this requirement and justify their negligence that they usually waited to give notice until they had arranged for everyone who wanted to leave the house, whether they were sick or healthy, to escape. Given that this was the case, it's clear that shutting houses was not a reliable method for stopping the infection. As I've mentioned elsewhere, many who left those infected homes actually had the plague, even if they believed themselves to be healthy. Some of these were the people who walked the streets until they collapsed and died—not because they were suddenly struck down like a bullet, but because the infection had been in their system long before. It quietly attacked their vital organs and only showed its true nature when it overwhelmed the heart, causing the person to die in an instant as though they were suddenly fainting or having an apoplectic episode.

I know that some even of our physicians thought for a time that those people that so died in the streets were seized but that moment they fell, as if they had been touched by a stroke from heaven as men are killed by a flash of lightning—but they found reason to alter their opinion afterward; for upon examining the bodies of such after they were dead, they always either had tokens upon them or other evident proofs of the distemper having been longer upon them than they had otherwise expected.

I know that some of our doctors initially believed that those who died in the streets were struck down at the moment they collapsed, as if they had been hit by a bolt from heaven, like people who are killed by a flash of lightning. However, they later changed their minds; upon examining the bodies after death, they consistently found either signs on them or other clear evidence indicating that the illness had been affecting them longer than they had previously thought.

This often was the reason that, as I have said, we that were examiners were not able to come at the knowledge of the infection being entered into a house till it was too late to shut it up, and sometimes not till the people that were left were all dead. In Petticoat Lane two houses together were infected, and several people sick; but the distemper was so well concealed, the examiner, who was my neighbour, got no knowledge of it till notice was sent him that the people were all dead, and that the carts should call there to fetch them away. The two heads of the families concerted their measures, and so ordered their matters as that when the examiner was in the neighbourhood they appeared generally at a time, and answered, that is, lied, for one another, or got some of the neighbourhood to say they were all in health—and perhaps knew no better—till, death making it impossible to keep it any longer as a secret, the dead-carts were called in the night to both the houses, and so it became public. But when the examiner ordered the constable to shut up the houses there was nobody left in them but three people, two in one house and one in the other, just dying, and a nurse in each house who acknowledged that they had buried five before, that the houses had been infected nine or ten days, and that for all the rest of the two families, which were many, they were gone, some sick, some well, or whether sick or well could not be known.

This was often the reason that, as I mentioned, we examiners couldn’t find out about the infection entering a house until it was too late to quarantine it, and sometimes not until everyone left was dead. In Petticoat Lane, two neighboring houses were infected, and several people were sick; but the illness was so well hidden that my neighbor, the examiner, didn’t learn about it until he was notified that everyone had died and the carts would come to take them away. The heads of the two families coordinated their actions so that when the examiner was in the area, they all appeared to be well at the same time, lying for each other or getting some neighbors to say they were all healthy—and perhaps they really didn't know any better—until death made it impossible to keep it a secret any longer, and the dead-carts were called to both houses at night, which made it public. But when the examiner ordered the constable to seal off the houses, there were only three people left in them: two in one house and one in the other, barely hanging on, and a nurse in each house who admitted they had buried five before, that the houses had been infected for nine or ten days, and that as for the rest of the two families, which were numerous, they had either left, some sick and some well, or it was impossible to tell if they were sick or well.

In like manner, at another house in the same lane, a man having his family infected but very unwilling to be shut up, when he could conceal it no longer, shut up himself; that is to say, he set the great red cross upon his door with the words, ‘Lord have mercy upon us’, and so deluded the examiner, who supposed it had been done by the constable by order of the other examiner, for there were two examiners to every district or precinct. By this means he had free egress and regress into his house again and out of it, as he pleased, notwithstanding it was infected, till at length his stratagem was found out; and then he, with the sound part of his servants and family, made off and escaped, so they were not shut up at all.

Similarly, at another house on the same street, a man whose family was infected but really didn’t want to be confined, when he could no longer hide it, isolated himself. He put a big red cross on his door with the words, ‘Lord have mercy upon us’, tricking the health inspector, who thought it had been done by the constable at the request of the other inspector, since there were two inspectors for each district. This way, he was able to come and go from his house as he liked, even though it was infected, until eventually his trick was discovered; then he and the healthy members of his household managed to escape, so they were never confined at all.

These things made it very hard, if not impossible, as I have said, to prevent the spreading of an infection by the shutting up of houses—unless the people would think the shutting of their houses no grievance, and be so willing to have it done as that they would give notice duly and faithfully to the magistrates of their being infected as soon as it was known by themselves; but as that cannot be expected from them, and the examiners cannot be supposed, as above, to go into their houses to visit and search, all the good of shutting up houses will be defeated, and few houses will be shut up in time, except those of the poor, who cannot conceal it, and of some people who will be discovered by the terror and consternation which the things put them into.

These factors made it really difficult, if not impossible, as I mentioned, to stop the spread of an infection by shutting up homes—unless people didn’t mind staying inside and were willing to promptly and honestly inform the authorities as soon as they realized they were infected. However, since that can’t be expected from them, and the inspectors can’t be assumed to enter their homes to check and investigate, the benefits of shutting up houses will be lost, and only a few homes will be quarantined in time, except for those of the needy who can’t hide their situation, and some individuals who will be identified by the fear and panic the circumstances cause them.

I got myself discharged of the dangerous office I was in as soon as I could get another admitted, whom I had obtained for a little money to accept of it; and so, instead of serving the two months, which was directed, I was not above three weeks in it; and a great while too, considering it was in the month of August, at which time the distemper began to rage with great violence at our end of the town.

I got myself released from the dangerous position I was in as soon as I could get someone else to take it, whom I had hired for a little money to accept it; and so, instead of serving the two months I was supposed to, I was only in it for about three weeks; which was quite a long time, especially since it was in August, when the illness started spreading rapidly in our part of the town.

In the execution of this office I could not refrain speaking my opinion among my neighbours as to this shutting up the people in their houses; in which we saw most evidently the severities that were used, though grievous in themselves, had also this particular objection against them: namely, that they did not answer the end, as I have said, but that the distempered people went day by day about the streets; and it was our united opinion that a method to have removed the sound from the sick, in case of a particular house being visited, would have been much more reasonable on many accounts, leaving nobody with the sick persons but such as should on such occasion request to stay and declare themselves content to be shut up with them.

While carrying out this task, I couldn’t help but share my thoughts with my neighbors about confining people in their homes. We clearly saw that, while the harsh measures were difficult to bear, they also had this specific drawback: they didn’t achieve their goal, as I mentioned, because the disturbed people continued to roam the streets day after day. We all agreed that a better approach would have been to isolate the sick from the healthy, especially if a specific house was affected. This way, only those who chose to stay with the sick and agreed to be confined with them would remain.

Our scheme for removing those that were sound from those that were sick was only in such houses as were infected, and confining the sick was no confinement; those that could not stir would not complain while they were in their senses and while they had the power of judging. Indeed, when they came to be delirious and light-headed, then they would cry out of the cruelty of being confined; but for the removal of those that were well, we thought it highly reasonable and just, for their own sakes, they should be removed from the sick, and that for other people’s safety they should keep retired for a while, to see that they were sound, and might not infect others; and we thought twenty or thirty days enough for this.

Our plan to separate the healthy from the sick was only for houses that were infected, and isolating the sick didn’t really feel like confinement; those who couldn’t move wouldn’t complain as long as they were aware and had the ability to reason. In fact, when they became delirious and confused, then they would complain about the cruelty of being confined. However, we believed it was completely fair and reasonable to remove the healthy for their own well-being, and for the safety of others, they should stay away for a while to ensure they were truly healthy and wouldn’t infect anyone else. We thought that twenty or thirty days would be sufficient for this.

Now, certainly, if houses had been provided on purpose for those that were sound to perform this demi-quarantine in, they would have much less reason to think themselves injured in such a restraint than in being confined with infected people in the houses where they lived.

Now, if homes had been specifically provided for those who were healthy to go through this partial quarantine, they would have much less reason to feel wronged about the restrictions than they do being locked up with infected individuals in their own homes.

It is here, however, to be observed that after the funerals became so many that people could not toll the bell, mourn or weep, or wear black for one another, as they did before; no, nor so much as make coffins for those that died; so after a while the fury of the infection appeared to be so increased that, in short, they shut up no houses at all. It seemed enough that all the remedies of that kind had been used till they were found fruitless, and that the plague spread itself with an irresistible fury; so that as the fire the succeeding year spread itself, and burned with such violence that the citizens, in despair, gave over their endeavours to extinguish it, so in the plague it came at last to such violence that the people sat still looking at one another, and seemed quite abandoned to despair; whole streets seemed to be desolated, and not to be shut up only, but to be emptied of their inhabitants; doors were left open, windows stood shattering with the wind in empty houses for want of people to shut them. In a word, people began to give up themselves to their fears and to think that all regulations and methods were in vain, and that there was nothing to be hoped for but an universal desolation; and it was even in the height of this general despair that it Pleased God to stay His hand, and to slacken the fury of the contagion in such a manner as was even surprising, like its beginning, and demonstrated it to be His own particular hand, and that above, if not without the agency of means, as I shall take notice of in its proper place.

It is important to note that once funerals became so frequent that people couldn't ring bells, mourn, or wear black for one another as they once did; nor could they even make coffins for those who died. Eventually, the intensity of the infection grew so severe that they stopped shutting up houses at all. It seemed that all the measures taken were fruitless, and the plague spread with relentless fury. As the fire spread the following year, burning with such intensity that people gave up trying to put it out, the plague eventually reached such heights that people just sat quietly, looking at each other, completely overwhelmed by despair. Whole streets appeared desolate, not just shut up, but emptied of their residents; doors were left open, and windows rattled in the wind of vacant houses, lacking anyone to close them. In other words, people started surrendering to their fears, believing that all rules and methods were useless, and that there was no hope except for complete devastation. It was in the midst of this widespread despair that, surprisingly, God chose to intervene, easing the grip of the contagion in a way that was astonishing, much like its onset, demonstrating it was His own hand at work, with or without the help of means, as I will discuss in due time.

But I must still speak of the plague as in its height, raging even to desolation, and the people under the most dreadful consternation, even, as I have said, to despair. It is hardly credible to what excess the passions of men carried them in this extremity of the distemper, and this part, I think, was as moving as the rest. What could affect a man in his full power of reflection, and what could make deeper impressions on the soul, than to see a man almost naked, and got out of his house, or perhaps out of his bed, into the street, come out of Harrow Alley, a populous conjunction or collection of alleys, courts, and passages in the Butcher Row in Whitechappel,—I say, what could be more affecting than to see this poor man come out into the open street, run dancing and singing and making a thousand antic gestures, with five or six women and children running after him, crying and calling upon him for the Lord’s sake to come back, and entreating the help of others to bring him back, but all in vain, nobody daring to lay a hand upon him or to come near him?

But I still need to talk about the plague at its peak, raging to the point of devastation, with people in absolute panic, even, as I mentioned, to the point of despair. It's hard to believe how far the emotions of people went in this extreme situation, and this part, I think, was just as emotional as the rest. What could impact someone in their full ability to think clearly, and what could leave deeper marks on the soul, than to see a man nearly naked, having come out of his house or maybe even out of his bed, into the street, emerging from Harrow Alley, a busy collection of alleys, courts, and passages in Butcher Row in Whitechapel—what could be more striking than seeing this poor man come into the open street, running, dancing, singing, and making a thousand silly gestures, with five or six women and children chasing after him, crying and pleading with him for the love of God to come back, and asking others to help bring him back, but all in vain, as no one dared to touch him or get close?

This was a most grievous and afflicting thing to me, who saw it all from my own windows; for all this while the poor afflicted man was, as I observed it, even then in the utmost agony of pain, having (as they said) two swellings upon him which could not be brought to break or to suppurate; but, by laying strong caustics on them, the surgeons had, it seems, hopes to break them—which caustics were then upon him, burning his flesh as with a hot iron. I cannot say what became of this poor man, but I think he continued roving about in that manner till he fell down and died.

This was a really heartbreaking and distressing thing for me, as I watched it all from my own windows. The poor man was, as I could see, in extreme agony, having, as they said, two swollen areas on him that wouldn’t burst or ooze. However, the surgeons thought that by applying strong caustics, they might have a chance to make them burst. Those caustics were on him, burning his flesh like a hot iron. I can't say what happened to this poor man, but I believe he kept moving around like that until he collapsed and died.

No wonder the aspect of the city itself was frightful. The usual concourse of people in the streets, and which used to be supplied from our end of the town, was abated. The Exchange was not kept shut, indeed, but it was no more frequented. The fires were lost; they had been almost extinguished for some days by a very smart and hasty rain. But that was not all; some of the physicians insisted that they were not only no benefit, but injurious to the health of people. This they made a loud clamour about, and complained to the Lord Mayor about it. On the other hand, others of the same faculty, and eminent too, opposed them, and gave their reasons why the fires were, and must be, useful to assuage the violence of the distemper. I cannot give a full account of their arguments on both sides; only this I remember, that they cavilled very much with one another. Some were for fires, but that they must be made of wood and not coal, and of particular sorts of wood too, such as fir in particular, or cedar, because of the strong effluvia of turpentine; others were for coal and not wood, because of the sulphur and bitumen; and others were for neither one or other. Upon the whole, the Lord Mayor ordered no more fires, and especially on this account, namely, that the plague was so fierce that they saw evidently it defied all means, and rather seemed to increase than decrease upon any application to check and abate it; and yet this amazement of the magistrates proceeded rather from want of being able to apply any means successfully than from any unwillingness either to expose themselves or undertake the care and weight of business; for, to do them justice, they neither spared their pains nor their persons. But nothing answered; the infection raged, and the people were now frighted and terrified to the last degree: so that, as I may say, they gave themselves up, and, as I mentioned above, abandoned themselves to their despair.

No wonder the city looked terrifying. The usual crowd of people on the streets, which typically came from our end of town, was gone. The Exchange wasn’t shut down, but it was no longer busy. The fires had almost gone out, having been nearly extinguished for several days by a sudden and heavy rain. But that wasn’t all; some doctors argued that the fires weren’t just useless, but harmful to people's health. They complained loudly to the Lord Mayor about it. On the other hand, some other respected physicians disagreed and explained why the fires were necessary to reduce the intensity of the disease. I can't summarize all their arguments, but I remember they argued a lot with each other. Some supported using fires but insisted they should be made from wood and not coal, preferring specific types of wood like fir or cedar because of the strong fumes from turpentine. Others wanted coal instead of wood because of the sulfur and tar, while some suggested neither. Ultimately, the Lord Mayor decided to stop all fires, especially because the plague was so severe that it was clear it ignored all efforts to control it and seemed to spread even more with any attempts to lessen it. Yet, the authorities were more paralyzed by their inability to effectively respond than by any unwillingness to put themselves at risk or handle the responsibilities. To be fair to them, they didn’t shy away from putting in the effort or their own safety. But nothing worked; the infection spread uncontrollably, and people were terrified to the utmost degree. They felt hopeless and, as I mentioned before, surrendered to their despair.

But let me observe here that, when I say the people abandoned themselves to despair, I do not mean to what men call a religious despair, or a despair of their eternal state, but I mean a despair of their being able to escape the infection or to outlive the plague which they saw was so raging and so irresistible in its force that indeed few people that were touched with it in its height, about August and September, escaped; and, which is very particular, contrary to its ordinary operation in June and July, and the beginning of August, when, as I have observed, many were infected, and continued so many days, and then went off after having had the poison in their blood a long time; but now, on the contrary, most of the people who were taken during the two last weeks in August and in the three first weeks in September, generally died in two or three days at furthest, and many the very same day they were taken; whether the dog-days, or, as our astrologers pretended to express themselves, the influence of the dog-star, had that malignant effect, or all those who had the seeds of infection before in them brought it up to a maturity at that time altogether, I know not; but this was the time when it was reported that above 3000 people died in one night; and they that would have us believe they more critically observed it pretend to say that they all died within the space of two hours, viz., between the hours of one and three in the morning.

But I want to point out that when I say people gave in to despair, I’m not talking about what people refer to as religious despair or worries about their eternal state. I mean a despair over being unable to escape the infection or survive the plague, which they saw was raging and utterly unstoppable. In fact, very few who were affected during its peak in August and September made it through. Interestingly, unlike its usual pattern in June, July, and early August—when many got infected and lingered for several days before succumbing—most of those who fell ill in the last two weeks of August and the first three weeks of September typically died within two or three days at most, with many passing away the very same day they got sick. Whether it was due to the dog days or, as our astrologers say, the influence of the dog star causing this deadly impact, or if those who already had the infection saw it worsen all at once, I don’t know. However, it was during this time that it was reported that more than 3,000 people died in one night, and those claiming to have observed this more carefully suggest that all these deaths occurred within just two hours, between one and three in the morning.

As to the suddenness of people’s dying at this time, more than before, there were innumerable instances of it, and I could name several in my neighbourhood. One family without the Bars, and not far from me, were all seemingly well on the Monday, being ten in family. That evening one maid and one apprentice were taken ill and died the next morning—when the other apprentice and two children were touched, whereof one died the same evening, and the other two on Wednesday. In a word, by Saturday at noon the master, mistress, four children, and four servants were all gone, and the house left entirely empty, except an ancient woman who came in to take charge of the goods for the master of the family’s brother, who lived not far off, and who had not been sick.

Regarding the suddenness of people's deaths during this time, there were more instances than ever before, and I could name several in my neighborhood. One family without the Bars, not far from me, seemed to be doing fine on Monday, with ten members in total. That evening, one maid and one apprentice fell ill and died the next morning—then the other apprentice and two children became ill, one of whom died that same evening, and the other two passed away on Wednesday. In short, by Saturday at noon, the master, mistress, four children, and four servants were all gone, leaving the house completely empty, except for an elderly woman who came in to look after the belongings for the master of the family’s brother, who lived nearby and had not been sick.

Many houses were then left desolate, all the people being carried away dead, and especially in an alley farther on the same side beyond the Bars, going in at the sign of Moses and Aaron, there were several houses together which, they said, had not one person left alive in them; and some that died last in several of those houses were left a little too long before they were fetched out to be buried; the reason of which was not, as some have written very untruly, that the living were not sufficient to bury the dead, but that the mortality was so great in the yard or alley that there was nobody left to give notice to the buriers or sextons that there were any dead bodies there to be buried. It was said, how true I know not, that some of those bodies were so much corrupted and so rotten that it was with difficulty they were carried; and as the carts could not come any nearer than to the Alley Gate in the High Street, it was so much the more difficult to bring them along; but I am not certain how many bodies were then left. I am sure that ordinarily it was not so.

Many houses were left abandoned, with all the people carried away dead, especially in an alley farther down the same side beyond the Bars. Entering at the sign of Moses and Aaron, there were several houses grouped together where they said not a single person was left alive. Some of those who died last in those houses were left a little too long before being taken out to be buried. This wasn't, as some have misleadingly written, because there weren't enough living people to bury the dead, but because the death toll was so high in the yard or alley that there was no one left to inform the buriers or sextons that there were any bodies to be buried. It was said—though I can't confirm how true it was—that some of those bodies were so decayed and rotten that they were difficult to transport. Since the carts couldn't get any closer than the Alley Gate on the High Street, it made it even harder to bring them out. But I'm not sure how many bodies were left behind at that time. I can say that typically, it wasn't like that.

As I have mentioned how the people were brought into a condition to despair of life and abandon themselves, so this very thing had a strange effect among us for three or four weeks; that is, it made them bold and venturous: they were no more shy of one another, or restrained within doors, but went anywhere and everywhere, and began to converse. One would say to another, ‘I do not ask you how you are, or say how I am; it is certain we shall all go; so ’tis no matter who is all sick or who is sound’; and so they ran desperately into any place or any company.

As I mentioned how people ended up feeling hopeless about life and gave up on themselves, this had a strange effect on us for three or four weeks. It made them bold and adventurous: they stopped being shy around each other and didn't stay cooped up indoors anymore. They went out everywhere and started talking to one another. One would say to another, "I won't ask how you're doing, or say how I'm doing; we all know we’re going to go, so it doesn’t matter who is sick or who is well," and they threw themselves into any place or crowd.

As it brought the people into public company, so it was surprising how it brought them to crowd into the churches. They inquired no more into whom they sat near to or far from, what offensive smells they met with, or what condition the people seemed to be in; but, looking upon themselves all as so many dead corpses, they came to the churches without the least caution, and crowded together as if their lives were of no consequence compared to the work which they came about there. Indeed, the zeal which they showed in coming, and the earnestness and affection they showed in their attention to what they heard, made it manifest what a value people would all put upon the worship of God if they thought every day they attended at the church that it would be their last.

As it brought people together in public, it was surprising how it also led them to fill up the churches. They no longer worried about who they were sitting next to or far away from, what unpleasant smells they encountered, or what condition the other attendees were in; instead, seeing themselves as mere corpses, they entered the churches without any hesitation, crowding together as if their lives were insignificant compared to the purpose they came there for. In fact, the enthusiasm they showed in coming and the seriousness and passion they demonstrated in their attention to what they heard made it clear how much value people would place on worshiping God if they believed that every time they went to church could be their last.

Nor was it without other strange effects, for it took away, all manner of prejudice at or scruple about the person whom they found in the pulpit when they came to the churches. It cannot be doubted but that many of the ministers of the parish churches were cut off, among others, in so common and dreadful a calamity; and others had not courage enough to stand it, but removed into the country as they found means for escape. As then some parish churches were quite vacant and forsaken, the people made no scruple of desiring such Dissenters as had been a few years before deprived of their livings by virtue of the Act of Parliament called the Act of Uniformity to preach in the churches; nor did the church ministers in that case make any difficulty of accepting their assistance; so that many of those whom they called silenced ministers had their mouths opened on this occasion and preached publicly to the people.

It also had other strange effects, as it removed any prejudice or hesitation about the person they found in the pulpit when they visited the churches. There's no doubt that many ministers in the parish churches were lost, among others, in such a widespread and terrible disaster; some lacked the courage to stay and instead moved to the countryside when they found a way to escape. As some parish churches were completely empty and abandoned, the people had no problem asking those Dissenters who had been deprived of their positions a few years earlier due to the Act of Uniformity to preach in the churches; the church ministers also had no issue accepting their help. As a result, many of those referred to as silenced ministers were given the opportunity to preach publicly to the people.

Here we may observe and I hope it will not be amiss to take notice of it that a near view of death would soon reconcile men of good principles one to another, and that it is chiefly owing to our easy situation in life and our putting these things far from us that our breaches are fomented, ill blood continued, prejudices, breach of charity and of Christian union, so much kept and so far carried on among us as it is. Another plague year would reconcile all these differences; a close conversing with death, or with diseases that threaten death, would scum off the gall from our tempers, remove the animosities among us, and bring us to see with differing eyes than those which we looked on things with before. As the people who had been used to join with the Church were reconciled at this time with the admitting the Dissenters to preach to them, so the Dissenters, who with an uncommon prejudice had broken off from the communion of the Church of England, were now content to come to their parish churches and to conform to the worship which they did not approve of before; but as the terror of the infection abated, those things all returned again to their less desirable channel and to the course they were in before.

Here we can observe, and I hope it's not inappropriate to mention, that a close encounter with death would quickly bring people of good principles closer together. It's mainly because we live comfortably and keep these thoughts at a distance that our conflicts continue, fostering resentment, ongoing grudges, prejudices, and a lack of charity and Christian unity among us. Another plague year would heal these divisions; being in close contact with death or diseases that threaten it would clear the bitterness from our tempers, eliminate our animosities, and help us see things from a different perspective than we did before. Just as the people who were used to attending the Church became more accepting when Dissenters were allowed to preach to them, the Dissenters—who had previously separated themselves from the Church of England out of an unusual prejudice—were now willing to attend their parish churches and conform to the worship they had disapproved of before. However, as the fear of the infection faded, all these issues returned to their previous, less desirable state.

I mention this but historically. I have no mind to enter into arguments to move either or both sides to a more charitable compliance one with another. I do not see that it is probable such a discourse would be either suitable or successful; the breaches seem rather to widen, and tend to a widening further, than to closing, and who am I that I should think myself able to influence either one side or other? But this I may repeat again, that ’tis evident death will reconcile us all; on the other side the grave we shall be all brethren again. In heaven, whither I hope we may come from all parties and persuasions, we shall find neither prejudice or scruple; there we shall be of one principle and of one opinion. Why we cannot be content to go hand in hand to the Place where we shall join heart and hand without the least hesitation, and with the most complete harmony and affection—I say, why we cannot do so here I can say nothing to, neither shall I say anything more of it but that it remains to be lamented.

I mention this only from a historical perspective. I have no intention of sparking arguments to push either side toward being more understanding of one another. I don’t think such a discussion would be appropriate or effective; the divides seem to be growing wider, not getting closer, and who am I to believe I could influence either side? But I can say again that it's clear death will bring us all together; once we’re on the other side of the grave, we'll all be brothers again. In heaven, where I hope we can all go regardless of our differences, there will be no bias or doubt; we will share the same beliefs and opinions. I wonder why we can’t be satisfied to move forward together to the place where we will join hearts and hands without any hesitation, in complete harmony and love—I mean, why we can’t do that here, I can’t say, and I’ll just leave it at that; it’s truly a shame.

I could dwell a great while upon the calamities of this dreadful time, and go on to describe the objects that appeared among us every day, the dreadful extravagancies which the distraction of sick people drove them into; how the streets began now to be fuller of frightful objects, and families to be made even a terror to themselves. But after I have told you, as I have above, that one man, being tied in his bed, and finding no other way to deliver himself, set the bed on fire with his candle, which unhappily stood within his reach, and burnt himself in his bed; and how another, by the insufferable torment he bore, danced and sung naked in the streets, not knowing one ecstasy from another; I say, after I have mentioned these things, what can be added more? What can be said to represent the misery of these times more lively to the reader, or to give him a more perfect idea of a complicated distress?

I could go on for a long time about the tragedies of this awful period and describe the shocking things we saw every day—the terrible extremes that the madness of sick people drove them to; how the streets became filled with horrifying sights, and families became a source of terror for themselves. But after telling you, as I have above, about one man who, being tied to his bed and finding no other way to free himself, set his bed on fire with his candle, which unfortunately was within his reach, and burned to death in his bed; and how another man, driven mad by unbearable pain, danced and sang naked in the streets, not even realizing the difference between one state of madness and another; I ask, after mentioning these things, what more can be added? What can better illustrate the misery of these times to the reader or give them a clearer picture of such complicated suffering?

I must acknowledge that this time was terrible, that I was sometimes at the end of all my resolutions, and that I had not the courage that I had at the beginning. As the extremity brought other people abroad, it drove me home, and except having made my voyage down to Blackwall and Greenwich, as I have related, which was an excursion, I kept afterwards very much within doors, as I had for about a fortnight before. I have said already that I repented several times that I had ventured to stay in town, and had not gone away with my brother and his family, but it was too late for that now; and after I had retreated and stayed within doors a good while before my impatience led me abroad, then they called me, as I have said, to an ugly and dangerous office which brought me out again; but as that was expired while the height of the distemper lasted, I retired again, and continued close ten or twelve days more, during which many dismal spectacles represented themselves in my view out of my own windows and in our own street—as that particularly from Harrow Alley, of the poor outrageous creature which danced and sung in his agony; and many others there were. Scarce a day or night passed over but some dismal thing or other happened at the end of that Harrow Alley, which was a place full of poor people, most of them belonging to the butchers or to employments depending upon the butchery.

I have to admit that this time was awful, that I sometimes reached the limit of all my resolve, and that I didn’t have the courage I had at first. While the crisis drove others out into the world, it pushed me indoors. Aside from my trip to Blackwall and Greenwich, which I’ve mentioned as a getaway, I mostly stayed at home, just like I had for about two weeks beforehand. I’ve already said that I regretted several times that I had decided to stay in the city instead of leaving with my brother and his family, but that was no longer an option. After I retreated and stayed inside for quite a while, my impatience drove me out again, only to be called back to a grim and risky duty that required me to go out. But once that was over and the worst of the illness had passed, I went back into hiding and stayed in for another ten or twelve days. During that time, many horrifying scenes played out before me from my own windows and in our street—like the particularly tragic sight from Harrow Alley of the poor deranged soul dancing and singing in his suffering, among many others. Hardly a day or night went by without some grim event happening at the end of Harrow Alley, which was filled with needy people, most of whom were connected to the butchery industry.

Sometimes heaps and throngs of people would burst out of the alley, most of them women, making a dreadful clamour, mixed or compounded of screeches, cryings, and calling one another, that we could not conceive what to make of it. Almost all the dead part of the night the dead-cart stood at the end of that alley, for if it went in it could not well turn again, and could go in but a little way. There, I say, it stood to receive dead bodies, and as the churchyard was but a little way off, if it went away full it would soon be back again. It is impossible to describe the most horrible cries and noise the poor people would make at their bringing the dead bodies of their children and friends out of the cart, and by the number one would have thought there had been none left behind, or that there were people enough for a small city living in those places. Several times they cried ‘Murder’, sometimes ‘Fire’; but it was easy to perceive it was all distraction, and the complaints of distressed and distempered people.

Sometimes crowds of people would rush out of the alley, mostly women, making a terrible noise filled with screaming, crying, and calling out to each other, leaving us confused about what was happening. The dead cart stood at the end of that alley almost all night because if it went in, it couldn’t turn around easily and could only go in a short distance. There, it waited to collect dead bodies, and since the churchyard was just a short way off, it would be back soon after leaving full. It’s impossible to describe the horrible screams and noise the poor people made when bringing out the dead bodies of their children and friends from the cart; by the number of them, one would think there was no one left behind or that enough people lived in those places for a small city. Several times, they cried ‘Murder,’ sometimes ‘Fire,’ but it was obvious that they were all in a state of panic, expressing the grief of upset and distraught people.

I believe it was everywhere thus as that time, for the plague raged for six or seven weeks beyond all that I have expressed, and came even to such a height that, in the extremity, they began to break into that excellent order of which I have spoken so much in behalf of the magistrates; namely, that no dead bodies were seen in the street or burials in the daytime: for there was a necessity in this extremity to bear with its being otherwise for a little while.

I think it was like this everywhere at that time, as the plague lasted for six or seven weeks beyond what I've mentioned, reaching such a peak that, in desperation, people started to disrupt that excellent order I've praised regarding the magistrates; specifically, that no dead bodies were seen in the streets and no burials took place during the day: because, in this extreme situation, it became necessary to handle things differently for a short time.

One thing I cannot omit here, and indeed I thought it was extraordinary, at least it seemed a remarkable hand of Divine justice: viz., that all the predictors, astrologers, fortune-tellers, and what they called cunning-men, conjurers, and the like: calculators of nativities and dreamers of dream, and such people, were gone and vanished; not one of them was to be found. I am verily persuaded that a great number of them fell in the heat of the calamity, having ventured to stay upon the prospect of getting great estates; and indeed their gain was but too great for a time, through the madness and folly of the people. But now they were silent; many of them went to their long home, not able to foretell their own fate or to calculate their own nativities. Some have been critical enough to say that every one of them died. I dare not affirm that; but this I must own, that I never heard of one of them that ever appeared after the calamity was over.

One thing I can't leave out here, and I honestly found it extraordinary, at least it seemed like a striking act of Divine justice: all the predictors, astrologers, fortune-tellers, and what they called cunning-men, conjurers, and similar folks—calculators of nativities and dream interpreters—were gone and disappeared; not one of them was around. I truly believe that a lot of them met their end in the chaos, having chosen to stay in hopes of acquiring great wealth; and their profits were indeed considerable for a time, thanks to the madness and foolishness of the people. But now they were silent; many of them went to their final resting place, unable to predict their own fate or calculate their own nativities. Some have been critical enough to claim that every single one of them died. I won't say that's true; but I do have to admit that I never heard of any of them appearing after the crisis was over.

But to return to my particular observations during this dreadful part of the visitation. I am now come, as I have said, to the month of September, which was the most dreadful of its kind, I believe, that ever London saw; for, by all the accounts which I have seen of the preceding visitations which have been in London, nothing has been like it, the number in the weekly bill amounting to almost 40,000 from the 22nd of August to the 26th of September, being but five weeks. The particulars of the bills are as follows, viz.:—

But to go back to my specific observations during this terrible time of the outbreak. I’ve now reached September, which was, I believe, the worst month of its kind that London has ever experienced; according to all the reports I’ve seen about previous outbreaks in London, nothing compares to it, with the weekly death toll reaching almost 40,000 from August 22 to September 26, just five weeks. The details of the numbers are as follows:—

     From August the   22nd to the 29th             7496
     ”     ”           29th     ”    5th September  8252
     ”    September the 5th     ”   12th            7690
     ”     ”           12th     ”   19th            8297
     ”     ”           19th     ”   26th            6460
                                                    ————
                                                  38,195
     From August 22nd to 29th             7496
     ”     ”           29th     ”    September 5th  8252
     ”    September 5th     ”   12th            7690
     ”     ”           12th     ”   19th            8297
     ”     ”           19th     ”   26th            6460
                                                    ————
                                                  38,195

This was a prodigious number of itself, but if I should add the reasons which I have to believe that this account was deficient, and how deficient it was, you would, with me, make no scruple to believe that there died above ten thousand a week for all those weeks, one week with another, and a proportion for several weeks both before and after. The confusion among the people, especially within the city, at that time, was inexpressible. The terror was so great at last that the courage of the people appointed to carry away the dead began to fail them; nay, several of them died, although they had the distemper before and were recovered, and some of them dropped down when they have been carrying the bodies even at the pit side, and just ready to throw them in; and this confusion was greater in the city because they had flattered themselves with hopes of escaping, and thought the bitterness of death was past. One cart, they told us, going up Shoreditch was forsaken of the drivers, or being left to one man to drive, he died in the street; and the horses going on overthrew the cart, and left the bodies, some thrown out here, some there, in a dismal manner. Another cart was, it seems, found in the great pit in Finsbury Fields, the driver being dead, or having been gone and abandoned it, and the horses running too near it, the cart fell in and drew the horses in also. It was suggested that the driver was thrown in with it and that the cart fell upon him, by reason his whip was seen to be in the pit among the bodies; but that, I suppose, could not be certain.

This was a staggering number on its own, but if I were to add the reasons I have to believe this account was incomplete, and how incomplete it was, you would easily agree with me that more than ten thousand were dying each week, week after week, along with a similar number in the weeks both before and after. The chaos among the people, especially in the city, during that time was unimaginable. The fear became so overwhelming that even those assigned to remove the dead started losing their courage; indeed, several of them died, even though they had previously been infected and recovered. Some collapsed while carrying the bodies, right at the edge of the pit, about to throw them in. This chaos was even worse in the city because they had convinced themselves they would be safe and thought they had evaded death's cruelty. One cart, they told us, was abandoned while going up Shoreditch; the driver had either left it to just one person, who then died in the street. The horses continued on, causing the cart to tip over and leaving bodies scattered haphazardly. Another cart was found in the large pit in Finsbury Fields, with the driver dead or having abandoned it, and when the horses came too close, the cart fell in, pulling the horses along with it. It was suggested that the driver was thrown in too, as his whip was later seen in the pit among the bodies, but I suppose we can’t be sure of that.

In our parish of Aldgate the dead-carts were several times, as I have heard, found standing at the churchyard gate full of dead bodies, but neither bellman or driver or any one else with it; neither in these or many other cases did they know what bodies they had in their cart, for sometimes they were let down with ropes out of balconies and out of windows, and sometimes the bearers brought them to the cart, sometimes other people; nor, as the men themselves said, did they trouble themselves to keep any account of the numbers.

In our Aldgate parish, the dead carts were often found parked at the churchyard gate, loaded with dead bodies, but there was no bellman, driver, or anyone else around. In these and many other instances, they didn’t even know whose bodies they had in the cart. Sometimes, the bodies were lowered with ropes from balconies or windows, and at other times, the bearers brought them to the cart, or other people did. The men themselves said they didn’t bother to keep track of the numbers.

The vigilance of the magistrates was now put to the utmost trial—and, it must be confessed, can never be enough acknowledged on this occasion also; whatever expense or trouble they were at, two things were never neglected in the city or suburbs either:—

The watchfulness of the magistrates was now pushed to the limit—and, it must be admitted, can never be appreciated enough in this situation; no matter the cost or effort they put in, two things were never overlooked in the city or the surrounding areas:—

(1) Provisions were always to be had in full plenty, and the price not much raised neither, hardly worth speaking.

(1) There was always an abundance of supplies, and the prices didn’t increase much, barely worth mentioning.

(2) No dead bodies lay unburied or uncovered; and if one walked from one end of the city to another, no funeral or sign of it was to be seen in the daytime, except a little, as I have said above, in the three first weeks in September.

(2) There were no dead bodies left unburied or uncovered; and if someone walked from one end of the city to the other, they wouldn’t see any funerals or signs of one during the day, except for a bit, as I mentioned earlier, in the first three weeks of September.

This last article perhaps will hardly be believed when some accounts which others have published since that shall be seen, wherein they say that the dead lay unburied, which I am assured was utterly false; at least, if it had been anywhere so, it must have been in houses where the living were gone from the dead (having found means, as I have observed, to escape) and where no notice was given to the officers. All which amounts to nothing at all in the case in hand; for this I am positive in, having myself been employed a little in the direction of that part in the parish in which I lived, and where as great a desolation was made in proportion to the number of inhabitants as was anywhere; I say, I am sure that there were no dead bodies remained unburied; that is to say, none that the proper officers knew of; none for want of people to carry them off, and buriers to put them into the ground and cover them; and this is sufficient to the argument; for what might lie in houses and holes, as in Moses and Aaron Alley, is nothing; for it is most certain they were buried as soon as they were found. As to the first article (namely, of provisions, the scarcity or dearness), though I have mentioned it before and shall speak of it again, yet I must observe here:—

This last article might be hard to believe when you see some accounts published by others, claiming that the dead were left unburied, which I can assure you is completely false. If there were any cases of that happening, it would have been in homes where the living had left the deceased behind (having found ways to escape, as I’ve noticed) and where no report was made to the officials. All of this doesn’t really matter in the current situation because I’m certain of this, having been involved a bit in managing that area of the parish where I lived, and where a significant level of devastation occurred in relation to the population. I mean, I know for sure that there were no dead bodies left unburied; that is, none that the appropriate officials were aware of; none due to a lack of people to transport them and bury them properly. This is enough for my point because whatever might have been left in houses and alleys, like in Moses and Aaron Alley, is irrelevant; they were definitely buried as soon as they were discovered. Regarding the first point (specifically about food shortages or high prices), although I’ve mentioned it before and will discuss it again, I need to point out here:—

(1) The price of bread in particular was not much raised; for in the beginning of the year, viz., in the first week in March, the penny wheaten loaf was ten ounces and a half; and in the height of the contagion it was to be had at nine ounces and a half, and never dearer, no, not all that season. And about the beginning of November it was sold ten ounces and a half again; the like of which, I believe, was never heard of in any city, under so dreadful a visitation, before.

(1) The price of bread, in particular, didn't rise much; at the start of the year, specifically the first week of March, the penny wheaten loaf weighed ten and a half ounces. At the peak of the outbreak, it was available at nine and a half ounces, and it never got more expensive, not even during that entire season. By early November, it was being sold at ten and a half ounces again; I believe such a thing had never been seen in any city during such a dreadful crisis before.

(2) Neither was there (which I wondered much at) any want of bakers or ovens kept open to supply the people with the bread; but this was indeed alleged by some families, viz., that their maidservants, going to the bakehouses with their dough to be baked, which was then the custom, sometimes came home with the sickness (that is to say the plague) upon them.

(2) I was really surprised that there were no shortages of bakers or ovens available to provide the people with bread; however, some families claimed that their maids, who would go to the bakeries to have their dough baked—which was the usual practice—sometimes returned home sick (meaning they had the plague).

In all this dreadful visitation there were, as I have said before, but two pest-houses made use of, viz., one in the fields beyond Old Street and one in Westminster; neither was there any compulsion used in carrying people thither. Indeed there was no need of compulsion in the case, for there were thousands of poor distressed people who, having no help or conveniences or supplies but of charity, would have been very glad to have been carried thither and been taken care of; which, indeed, was the only thing that I think was wanting in the whole public management of the city, seeing nobody was here allowed to be brought to the pest-house but where money was given, or security for money, either at their introducing or upon their being cured and sent out—for very many were sent out again whole; and very good physicians were appointed to those places, so that many people did very well there, of which I shall make mention again. The principal sort of people sent thither were, as I have said, servants who got the distemper by going on errands to fetch necessaries to the families where they lived, and who in that case, if they came home sick, were removed to preserve the rest of the house; and they were so well looked after there in all the time of the visitation that there was but 156 buried in all at the London pest-house, and 159 at that of Westminster.

During this terrible outbreak, as I mentioned earlier, there were only two pest-houses in use: one in the fields beyond Old Street and the other in Westminster. There was no pressure to force people to go there. In fact, there was no need for force because thousands of desperate people, with no help or resources except for charity, would have eagerly accepted being taken there for care. This was really the only thing I think was missing in the city's public management, since nobody was allowed into the pest-house unless they provided money or some guarantee of payment, either upon arrival or when they were cured and discharged—many were sent back healthy. Very good doctors were assigned to these places, and many people had successful outcomes, which I will mention again. The main group of people sent there were, as I said, servants who caught the illness while running errands for their households, and if they returned home sick, they were relocated to protect the rest of the family. They were well cared for during the outbreak, resulting in only 156 burials at the London pest-house and 159 at the one in Westminster.

By having more pest-houses I am far from meaning a forcing all people into such places. Had the shutting up of houses been omitted and the sick hurried out of their dwellings to pest-houses, as some proposed, it seems, at that time as well as since, it would certainly have been much worse than it was. The very removing the sick would have been a spreading of the infection, and rather because that removing could not effectually clear the house where the sick person was of the distemper; and the rest of the family, being then left at liberty, would certainly spread it among others.

By having more pest houses, I definitely don’t mean to force everyone into those places. If we had just closed off homes and rushed sick people into pest houses, as some suggested back then and since, it would have been much worse than it actually was. Simply moving the sick would have just spread the infection, especially since that move wouldn’t effectively rid the house of the disease. Leaving the rest of the family free would definitely have spread it to others.

The methods also in private families, which would have been universally used to have concealed the distemper and to have concealed the persons being sick, would have been such that the distemper would sometimes have seized a whole family before any visitors or examiners could have known of it. On the other hand, the prodigious numbers which would have been sick at a time would have exceeded all the capacity of public pest-houses to receive them, or of public officers to discover and remove them.

The methods used in private households to hide illnesses and keep sick people out of sight would have been so effective that an entire family could have fallen ill before anyone, including visitors or health officials, found out. On the other hand, the huge number of people who would have been sick at once would have overwhelmed public pest-houses and made it impossible for authorities to identify and handle the situation.

This was well considered in those days, and I have heard them talk of it often. The magistrates had enough to do to bring people to submit to having their houses shut up, and many ways they deceived the watchmen and got out, as I have observed. But that difficulty made it apparent that they would have found it impracticable to have gone the other way to work, for they could never have forced the sick people out of their beds and out of their dwellings. It must not have been my Lord Mayor’s officers, but an army of officers, that must have attempted it; and the people, on the other hand, would have been enraged and desperate, and would have killed those that should have offered to have meddled with them or with their children and relations, whatever had befallen them for it; so that they would have made the people, who, as it was, were in the most terrible distraction imaginable, I say, they would have made them stark mad; whereas the magistrates found it proper on several accounts to treat them with lenity and compassion, and not with violence and terror, such as dragging the sick out of their houses or obliging them to remove themselves, would have been.

This was well thought out back then, and I've heard people talk about it frequently. The magistrates had their hands full getting people to accept having their homes locked up, and there were many ways they tricked the watchmen and escaped, as I’ve noticed. But that challenge made it clear that it would have been impossible to take the other approach, as they could never have forced sick people out of their beds and homes. It likely wouldn't have been just my Lord Mayor’s officers, but a whole army of them that would have had to try it; on the other hand, the people would have been furious and desperate, ready to harm anyone who tried to interfere with them or their children and loved ones, no matter what happened as a result. So, they would have driven these people—who were already in the most terrible state imaginable—completely mad. Meanwhile, the magistrates decided it was best for several reasons to treat them with kindness and understanding, not with violence and fear, like dragging the sick out of their homes or forcing them to leave would have been.

This leads me again to mention the time when the plague first began; that is to say, when it became certain that it would spread over the whole town, when, as I have said, the better sort of people first took the alarm and began to hurry themselves out of town. It was true, as I observed in its place, that the throng was so great, and the coaches, horses, waggons, and carts were so many, driving and dragging the people away, that it looked as if all the city was running away; and had any regulations been published that had been terrifying at that time, especially such as would pretend to dispose of the people otherwise than they would dispose of themselves, it would have put both the city and suburbs into the utmost confusion.

This brings me back to when the plague first started; that is, when it became clear that it would spread throughout the entire town. As I mentioned earlier, it was at this time that the more affluent residents started to panic and quickly left the city. It was true, as I noted before, that the crowds were overwhelming, and the number of coaches, horses, wagons, and carts was so high, transporting people away, that it seemed like the whole city was fleeing. If any frightening regulations had been announced at that moment, especially ones that attempted to control people’s movements contrary to their own decisions, it would have caused complete chaos in both the city and the suburbs.

But the magistrates wisely caused the people to be encouraged, made very good bye-laws for the regulating the citizens, keeping good order in the streets, and making everything as eligible as possible to all sorts of people.

But the magistrates wisely encouraged the people, created effective by-laws to regulate the citizens, maintain order in the streets, and make everything as accessible as possible for everyone.

In the first place, the Lord Mayor and the sheriffs, the Court of Aldermen, and a certain number of the Common Council men, or their deputies, came to a resolution and published it, viz., that they would not quit the city themselves, but that they would be always at hand for the preserving good order in every place and for the doing justice on all occasions; as also for the distributing the public charity to the poor; and, in a word, for the doing the duty and discharging the trust reposed in them by the citizens to the utmost of their power.

First of all, the Lord Mayor, the sheriffs, the Court of Aldermen, and a number of Common Council members or their deputies came to a decision and announced it. They stated that they wouldn’t leave the city themselves but would remain available to maintain order everywhere, deliver justice on all occasions, distribute public charity to the poor, and, in short, fulfill their duties and responsibilities entrusted to them by the citizens to the best of their abilities.

In pursuance of these orders, the Lord Mayor, sheriffs, &c., held councils every day, more or less, for making such dispositions as they found needful for preserving the civil peace; and though they used the people with all possible gentleness and clemency, yet all manner of presumptuous rogues such as thieves, housebreakers, plunderers of the dead or of the sick, were duly punished, and several declarations were continually published by the Lord Mayor and Court of Aldermen against such.

To follow these orders, the Lord Mayor, sheriffs, etc., held meetings almost daily to discuss what needed to be done to maintain civil order. Although they treated the people with as much kindness and fairness as possible, they made sure to punish all kinds of arrogant criminals like thieves, burglars, and looters of the dead or sick. The Lord Mayor and Court of Aldermen regularly issued statements against such behavior.

Also all constables and churchwardens were enjoined to stay in the city upon severe penalties, or to depute such able and sufficient housekeepers as the deputy aldermen or Common Council men of the precinct should approve, and for whom they should give security; and also security in case of mortality that they would forthwith constitute other constables in their stead.

Also, all constables and churchwardens were required to remain in the city under strict penalties, or to appoint capable and reliable housekeepers approved by the deputy aldermen or Common Council members of the area, for whom they would provide security; they also needed to ensure there was security in case of death so that they would promptly appoint other constables to take their place.

These things re-established the minds of the people very much, especially in the first of their fright, when they talked of making so universal a flight that the city would have been in danger of being entirely deserted of its inhabitants except the poor, and the country of being plundered and laid waste by the multitude. Nor were the magistrates deficient in performing their part as boldly as they promised it; for my Lord Mayor and the sheriffs were continually in the streets and at places of the greatest danger, and though they did not care for having too great a resort of people crowding about them, yet in emergent cases they never denied the people access to them, and heard with patience all their grievances and complaints. My Lord Mayor had a low gallery built on purpose in his hall, where he stood a little removed from the crowd when any complaint came to be heard, that he might appear with as much safety as possible.

These events really reassured the people, especially at first when they were so frightened that they talked about leaving in such numbers that the city might have ended up completely deserted except for the poor, and the countryside could have been looted and devastated by the mob. The magistrates stepped up and did their part as bravely as they promised; the Lord Mayor and the sheriffs were constantly in the streets and at the most dangerous spots. Although they didn't want a large crowd surrounding them, in urgent situations they always allowed people to approach and listened patiently to all their concerns and complaints. The Lord Mayor even had a low gallery built in his hall, where he stood a bit away from the crowd when any complaints were being addressed, so he could appear as safely as possible.

Likewise the proper officers, called my Lord Mayor’s officers, constantly attended in their turns, as they were in waiting; and if any of them were sick or infected, as some of them were, others were instantly employed to fill up and officiate in their places till it was known whether the other should live or die.

Similarly, the appropriate officers, known as the Lord Mayor’s officers, regularly showed up for duty as scheduled. If any of them were ill or infected, which some were, others were quickly assigned to take their places until it was determined whether the sick ones would recover or not.

In like manner the sheriffs and aldermen did in their several stations and wards, where they were placed by office, and the sheriff’s officers or sergeants were appointed to receive orders from the respective aldermen in their turn, so that justice was executed in all cases without interruption. In the next place, it was one of their particular cares to see the orders for the freedom of the markets observed, and in this part either the Lord Mayor or one or both of the sheriffs were every market-day on horseback to see their orders executed and to see that the country people had all possible encouragement and freedom in their coming to the markets and going back again, and that no nuisances or frightful objects should be seen in the streets to terrify them or make them unwilling to come. Also the bakers were taken under particular order, and the Master of the Bakers’ Company was, with his court of assistants, directed to see the order of my Lord Mayor for their regulation put in execution, and the due assize of bread (which was weekly appointed by my Lord Mayor) observed; and all the bakers were obliged to keep their oven going constantly, on pain of losing the privileges of a freeman of the city of London.

Similarly, the sheriffs and aldermen carried out their duties in their designated areas, where they were assigned by their positions. The sheriff’s officers or sergeants were tasked with taking orders from the respective aldermen in turn, ensuring that justice was served in all cases without delay. Additionally, it was one of their specific responsibilities to ensure that the rules for maintaining market freedom were followed. Every market day, either the Lord Mayor or one or both of the sheriffs would ride on horseback to ensure these orders were enforced, making sure that country folk were encouraged and allowed to come to the markets and return home without any issues, and that no hazards or frightening sights would deter them from coming. Moreover, bakers were subject to specific regulations, and the Master of the Bakers’ Company, along with his court of assistants, was responsible for ensuring that the Lord Mayor's directives regarding their operation were implemented, including the proper weekly set price for bread established by the Lord Mayor. All bakers were required to keep their ovens running consistently, or risk losing their rights as freemen of the city of London.

By this means bread was always to be had in plenty, and as cheap as usual, as I said above; and provisions were never wanting in the markets, even to such a degree that I often wondered at it, and reproached myself with being so timorous and cautious in stirring abroad, when the country people came freely and boldly to market, as if there had been no manner of infection in the city, or danger of catching it.

By this way, bread was always available in abundance and as cheap as ever, as I mentioned earlier; the markets never ran out of supplies, to the point that I often found myself amazed and criticized myself for being so shy and careful about going out, while the locals came to the market freely and confidently, as if there was no infection in the city or any risk of catching it.

It was indeed one admirable piece of conduct in the said magistrates that the streets were kept constantly clear and free from all manner of frightful objects, dead bodies, or any such things as were indecent or unpleasant—unless where anybody fell down suddenly or died in the streets, as I have said above; and these were generally covered with some cloth or blanket, or removed into the next churchyard till night. All the needful works that carried terror with them, that were both dismal and dangerous, were done in the night; if any diseased bodies were removed, or dead bodies buried, or infected clothes burnt, it was done in the night; and all the bodies which were thrown into the great pits in the several churchyards or burying-grounds, as has been observed, were so removed in the night, and everything was covered and closed before day. So that in the daytime there was not the least signal of the calamity to be seen or heard of, except what was to be observed from the emptiness of the streets, and sometimes from the passionate outcries and lamentations of the people, out at their windows, and from the numbers of houses and shops shut up.

It was certainly impressive how the magistrates managed to keep the streets clear of all kinds of horrifying sights, like dead bodies or anything else indecent or unpleasant—unless someone collapsed suddenly or died in the streets, as I mentioned before; in those cases, they were usually covered with a cloth or blanket or moved to the nearest churchyard until night. All the necessary tasks that were scary, both grim and dangerous, were carried out at night; if any bodies needed to be moved, or dead bodies buried, or infected clothes burned, it happened at night. Additionally, all the bodies thrown into the large pits in various churchyards or burial grounds, as noted, were removed at night, and everything was covered and closed up before dawn. So during the day, there were no signs of the disaster to be seen or heard, except for the emptiness of the streets and sometimes the heartfelt cries and mourning of people from their windows, along with the many houses and shops that were closed.

Nor was the silence and emptiness of the streets so much in the city as in the out-parts, except just at one particular time when, as I have mentioned, the plague came east and spread over all the city. It was indeed a merciful disposition of God, that as the plague began at one end of the town first (as has been observed at large) so it proceeded progressively to other parts, and did not come on this way, or eastward, till it had spent its fury in the West part of the town; and so, as it came on one way, it abated another. For example, it began at St Giles’s and the Westminster end of the town, and it was in its height in all that part by about the middle of July, viz., in St Giles-in-the-Fields, St Andrew’s, Holborn, St Clement Danes, St Martin-in-the-Fields, and in Westminster. The latter end of July it decreased in those parishes; and coming east, it increased prodigiously in Cripplegate, St Sepulcher’s, St James’s, Clarkenwell, and St Bride’s and Aldersgate. While it was in all these parishes, the city and all the parishes of the Southwark side of the water and all Stepney, Whitechappel, Aldgate, Wapping, and Ratcliff, were very little touched; so that people went about their business unconcerned, carried on their trades, kept open their shops, and conversed freely with one another in all the city, the east and north-east suburbs, and in Southwark, almost as if the plague had not been among us.

The silence and emptiness of the streets were more noticeable in the outskirts of the city than in the center, except for one specific time when, as I mentioned, the plague moved east and spread throughout the city. It was truly a merciful arrangement from God that, as the plague started in one part of town first (as has been explained in detail), it gradually spread to other areas, and didn’t hit this way, or eastward, until it had exhausted its force in the western part of town; thus, as it advanced in one direction, it lessened in another. For instance, it began at St Giles’s and the Westminster side of the town, reaching its peak around mid-July, specifically in St Giles-in-the-Fields, St Andrew’s, Holborn, St Clement Danes, St Martin-in-the-Fields, and Westminster. By late July, it lessened in those areas, but as it moved east, it surged dramatically in Cripplegate, St Sepulcher’s, St James’s, Clerkenwell, St Bride’s, and Aldersgate. During its peak in all these parishes, the city and all the parishes on the Southwark side of the river—as well as Stepney, Whitechapel, Aldgate, Wapping, and Ratcliff—were hardly affected at all; people went about their business without worry, continued their trades, kept their shops open, and chatted freely with one another throughout the city, the east and northeast suburbs, and in Southwark, almost as if the plague hadn’t been present at all.

Even when the north and north-west suburbs were fully infected, viz., Cripplegate, Clarkenwell, Bishopsgate, and Shoreditch, yet still all the rest were tolerably well. For example from 25th July to 1st August the bill stood thus of all diseases:—

Even when the northern and northwestern suburbs were completely affected, like Cripplegate, Clerkenwell, Bishopsgate, and Shoreditch, the rest were still in fairly good shape. For example, from July 25th to August 1st, the report on all diseases was as follows:—

     St Giles, Cripplegate                              554
     St Sepulchers                                      250
     Clarkenwell                                        103
     Bishopsgate                                        116
     Shoreditch                                         110
     Stepney parish                                     127
     Aldgate                                             92
     Whitechappel                                       104
     All the ninety-seven parishes within the walls     228
     All the parishes in Southwark                      205
     -                                                ——-
     -    Total                                        1889
     St Giles, Cripplegate                              554
     St Sepulchers                                      250
     Clarkenwell                                        103
     Bishopsgate                                        116
     Shoreditch                                         110
     Stepney parish                                     127
     Aldgate                                             92
     Whitechapel                                       104
     All the ninety-seven parishes within the walls     228
     All the parishes in Southwark                      205
     -                                                ——-
     -    Total                                        1889

So that, in short, there died more that week in the two parishes of Cripplegate and St Sepulcher by forty-eight than in all the city, all the east suburbs, and all the Southwark parishes put together. This caused the reputation of the city’s health to continue all over England—and especially in the counties and markets adjacent, from whence our supply of provisions chiefly came even much longer than that health itself continued; for when the people came into the streets from the country by Shoreditch and Bishopsgate, or by Old Street and Smithfield, they would see the out-streets empty and the houses and shops shut, and the few people that were stirring there walk in the middle of the streets. But when they came within the city, there things looked better, and the markets and shops were open, and the people walking about the streets as usual, though not quite so many; and this continued till the latter end of August and the beginning of September.

That week, in short, there were forty-eight more deaths in the two parishes of Cripplegate and St Sepulcher than in the entire city, all the eastern suburbs, and all the Southwark parishes combined. This made the city seem unhealthy all over England—especially in the nearby counties and markets, which were our main sources of food supplies—even longer than the actual health crisis lasted; because when people came into the streets from the countryside via Shoreditch and Bishopsgate, or through Old Street and Smithfield, they would see the outer streets empty, with houses and shops shut, and the few people out and about walking in the middle of the streets. But once they entered the city, things looked better—markets and shops were open, and people were walking around the streets as usual, though in fewer numbers; and this situation persisted until late August and early September.

But then the case altered quite; the distemper abated in the west and north-west parishes, and the weight of the infection lay on the city and the eastern suburbs, and the Southwark side, and this in a frightful manner. Then, indeed, the city began to look dismal, shops to be shut, and the streets desolate. In the High Street, indeed, necessity made people stir abroad on many occasions; and there would be in the middle of the day a pretty many people, but in the mornings and evenings scarce any to be seen, even there, no, not in Cornhill and Cheapside.

But then the situation changed completely; the illness lessened in the west and northwest neighborhoods, while the burden of infection fell heavily on the city, the eastern suburbs, and the Southwark area, and it was extremely severe. At that point, the city really began to appear gloomy, shops closed down, and the streets became deserted. In High Street, people had to go out for essentials on several occasions, and there would be a decent number of people around during the day, but in the mornings and evenings, hardly anyone could be seen, even there, not even in Cornhill and Cheapside.

These observations of mine were abundantly confirmed by the weekly bills of mortality for those weeks, an abstract of which, as they respect the parishes which I have mentioned and as they make the calculations I speak of very evident, take as follows.

These observations of mine were clearly supported by the weekly death reports for those weeks, a summary of which, relating to the parishes I mentioned and making the calculations I refer to very clear, is as follows.

The weekly bill, which makes out this decrease of the burials in the west and north side of the city, stands thus—

The weekly report, which shows the drop in burials in the west and north sides of the city, is as follows—

     From the 12th of September to the 19th—
     -    St Giles, Cripplegate                            456
     -    St Giles-in-the-Fields                           140
     -    Clarkenwell                                       77
     -    St Sepulcher                                     214
     -    St Leonard, Shoreditch                           183
     -    Stepney parish                                   716
     -    Aldgate                                          623
     -    Whitechappel                                     532
     -    In the ninety-seven parishes within the walls   1493
     -    In the eight parishes on Southwark side         1636
     -                                                    ————
     -         Total                                      6060
     From the 12th of September to the 19th—
     -    St Giles, Cripplegate                            456
     -    St Giles-in-the-Fields                           140
     -    Clarkenwell                                       77
     -    St Sepulcher                                     214
     -    St Leonard, Shoreditch                           183
     -    Stepney parish                                   716
     -    Aldgate                                          623
     -    Whitechapel                                      532
     -    In the ninety-seven parishes within the walls   1493
     -    In the eight parishes on Southwark side         1636
     -                                                    ————
     -         Total                                      6060

Here is a strange change of things indeed, and a sad change it was; and had it held for two months more than it did, very few people would have been left alive. But then such, I say, was the merciful disposition of God that, when it was thus, the west and north part which had been so dreadfully visited at first, grew, as you see, much better; and as the people disappeared here, they began to look abroad again there; and the next week or two altered it still more; that is, more to the encouragement of the other part of the town. For example:—

Here is a bizarre turn of events, and it was a sad one; if it had lasted two months longer than it did, very few people would have survived. But as I said, it was the merciful nature of God that, when things were at their worst, the western and northern parts, which had first been so severely affected, improved significantly; and as the population diminished here, they started to look outward there; and in the following week or two, things improved even more, which encouraged the remaining parts of the town. For example:—

     From the 19th of September to the 26th—
     -    St Giles, Cripplegate                           277
     -    St Giles-in-the-Fields                          119
     -    Clarkenwell                                      76
     -    St Sepulchers                                   193
     -    St Leonard, Shoreditch                          146
     -    Stepney parish                                  616
     -    Aldgate                                         496
     -    Whitechappel                                    346
     -    In the ninety-seven parishes within the walls  1268
     -    In the eight parishes on Southwark side        1390
     -                                                   ————
     -              Total                                4927

     From the 26th of September to the 3rd of October—
     -    St Giles, Cripplegate                           196
     -    St Giles-in-the-Fields                           95
     -    Clarkenwell                                      48
     -    St Sepulchers                                   137
     -    St Leonard, Shoreditch                          128
     -    Stepney parish                                  674
     -    Aldgate                                         372
     -    Whitechappel                                    328
     -    In the ninety-seven parishes within the walls  1149
     -    In the eight parishes on Southwark side        1201
     -                                                   ————
     -    Total                                          4382
     From the 19th of September to the 26th—
     -    St Giles, Cripplegate                           277
     -    St Giles-in-the-Fields                          119
     -    Clarkenwell                                      76
     -    St Sepulchers                                   193
     -    St Leonard, Shoreditch                          146
     -    Stepney parish                                  616
     -    Aldgate                                         496
     -    Whitechapel                                     346
     -    In the ninety-seven parishes within the walls  1268
     -    In the eight parishes on the Southwark side     1390
     -                                                   ————
     -              Total                                4927

     From the 26th of September to the 3rd of October—
     -    St Giles, Cripplegate                           196
     -    St Giles-in-the-Fields                           95
     -    Clarkenwell                                      48
     -    St Sepulchers                                   137
     -    St Leonard, Shoreditch                          128
     -    Stepney parish                                  674
     -    Aldgate                                         372
     -    Whitechapel                                     328
     -    In the ninety-seven parishes within the walls  1149
     -    In the eight parishes on the Southwark side     1201
     -                                                   ————
     -    Total                                          4382

And now the misery of the city and of the said east and south parts was complete indeed; for, as you see, the weight of the distemper lay upon those parts, that is to say, the city, the eight parishes over the river, with the parishes of Aldgate, Whitechappel, and Stepney; and this was the time that the bills came up to such a monstrous height as that I mentioned before, and that eight or nine, and, as I believe, ten or twelve thousand a week, died; for it is my settled opinion that they never could come at any just account of the numbers, for the reasons which I have given already.

And now the suffering in the city, especially in the eastern and southern parts, was truly complete; because, as you can see, the burden of the illness was heavy in those areas, which included the city, the eight parishes across the river, along with the parishes of Aldgate, Whitechapel, and Stepney. This was the time when the death toll reached an alarming number, as I mentioned before, with eight or nine, and I believe even ten or twelve thousand people dying each week. It’s my firm belief that they could never accurately count the numbers for the reasons I have already stated.

Nay, one of the most eminent physicians, who has since published in Latin an account of those times, and of his observations says that in one week there died twelve thousand people, and that particularly there died four thousand in one night; though I do not remember that there ever was any such particular night so remarkably fatal as that such a number died in it. However, all this confirms what I have said above of the uncertainty of the bills of mortality, &c., of which I shall say more hereafter.

No, one of the most notable doctors, who later published an account of that time in Latin, states that in just one week, twelve thousand people died, with four thousand dying in a single night. However, I don’t recall there ever being a specific night that was as extraordinarily deadly as that. Still, all this supports what I mentioned earlier about the unreliable nature of mortality reports, which I will discuss further later on.

And here let me take leave to enter again, though it may seem a repetition of circumstances, into a description of the miserable condition of the city itself, and of those parts where I lived at this particular time. The city and those other parts, notwithstanding the great numbers of people that were gone into the country, was vastly full of people; and perhaps the fuller because people had for a long time a strong belief that the plague would not come into the city, nor into Southwark, no, nor into Wapping or Ratcliff at all; nay, such was the assurance of the people on that head that many removed from the suburbs on the west and north sides, into those eastern and south sides as for safety; and, as I verily believe, carried the plague amongst them there perhaps sooner than they would otherwise have had it.

And now, let me take a moment to describe once again the terrible state of the city and the areas where I lived during this time. The city and those neighborhoods, even though many people had gone to the countryside, were incredibly crowded; maybe even more crowded because people had strongly believed for a long time that the plague wouldn’t reach the city, Southwark, Wapping, or Ratcliff at all. In fact, the people's confidence was so strong that many moved from the suburbs on the west and north sides to the eastern and southern sides for safety. I truly believe they ended up bringing the plague with them there, possibly sooner than they would have encountered it otherwise.

Here also I ought to leave a further remark for the use of posterity, concerning the manner of people’s infecting one another; namely, that it was not the sick people only from whom the plague was immediately received by others that were sound, but the well. To explain myself: by the sick people I mean those who were known to be sick, had taken their beds, had been under cure, or had swellings and tumours upon them, and the like; these everybody could beware of; they were either in their beds or in such condition as could not be concealed.

Here, I should add an important note for future generations about how people infected each other. It wasn't just the sick individuals who directly passed the plague to those who were healthy, but also the well ones. To clarify: by "sick people," I refer to those who were clearly ill, confined to their beds, receiving treatment, or showing visible signs of illness like swellings and tumors; these were easy for everyone to avoid. They were either in bed or in a state that couldn't be hidden.

By the well I mean such as had received the contagion, and had it really upon them, and in their blood, yet did not show the consequences of it in their countenances: nay, even were not sensible of it themselves, as many were not for several days. These breathed death in every place, and upon everybody who came near them; nay, their very clothes retained the infection, their hands would infect the things they touched, especially if they were warm and sweaty, and they were generally apt to sweat too.

By "the well," I mean those who had contracted the disease and had it genuinely in their bodies, but didn’t show any signs on their faces; in fact, many of them weren’t even aware of it for several days. They spread death everywhere and to everyone who got close to them; even their clothes held the infection, and their hands would contaminate whatever they touched, especially if they were warm and sweaty, which they often were.

Now it was impossible to know these people, nor did they sometimes, as I have said, know themselves to be infected. These were the people that so often dropped down and fainted in the streets; for oftentimes they would go about the streets to the last, till on a sudden they would sweat, grow faint, sit down at a door and die. It is true, finding themselves thus, they would struggle hard to get home to their own doors, or at other times would be just able to go into their houses and die instantly; other times they would go about till they had the very tokens come out upon them, and yet not know it, and would die in an hour or two after they came home, but be well as long as they were abroad. These were the dangerous people; these were the people of whom the well people ought to have been afraid; but then, on the other side, it was impossible to know them.

Now it was impossible to understand these people, and sometimes they didn’t even realize they were infected. These were the individuals who often collapsed and fainted in the streets; they would walk around until suddenly they started to sweat, felt faint, and would sit down at a doorway to die. It's true that when they found themselves in this state, they would struggle hard to get home, or at other times they would just make it into their houses only to die instantly; other times they would move around until the symptoms appeared, and yet remain unaware, dying an hour or two after getting home, but feeling fine while they were out. These were the dangerous individuals; these were the ones that healthy people should have feared; but on the other hand, it was impossible to identify them.

And this is the reason why it is impossible in a visitation to prevent the spreading of the plague by the utmost human vigilance: viz., that it is impossible to know the infected people from the sound, or that the infected people should perfectly know themselves. I knew a man who conversed freely in London all the season of the plague in 1665, and kept about him an antidote or cordial on purpose to take when he thought himself in any danger, and he had such a rule to know or have warning of the danger by as indeed I never met with before or since. How far it may be depended on I know not. He had a wound in his leg, and whenever he came among any people that were not sound, and the infection began to affect him, he said he could know it by that signal, viz., that his wound in his leg would smart, and look pale and white; so as soon as ever he felt it smart it was time for him to withdraw, or to take care of himself, taking his drink, which he always carried about him for that purpose. Now it seems he found his wound would smart many times when he was in company with such who thought themselves to be sound, and who appeared so to one another; but he would presently rise up and say publicly, ‘Friends, here is somebody in the room that has the plague’, and so would immediately break up the company. This was indeed a faithful monitor to all people that the plague is not to be avoided by those that converse promiscuously in a town infected, and people have it when they know it not, and that they likewise give it to others when they know not that they have it themselves; and in this case shutting up the well or removing the sick will not do it, unless they can go back and shut up all those that the sick had conversed with, even before they knew themselves to be sick, and none knows how far to carry that back, or where to stop; for none knows when or where or how they may have received the infection, or from whom.

And this is why it’s impossible during an outbreak to stop the spread of the plague, no matter how vigilant people are: it’s simply not possible to distinguish infected individuals from healthy ones, or for those who are infected to recognize their own condition. I once knew a man who freely mingled in London throughout the plague season of 1665, carrying an antidote or a tonic with him to use whenever he thought he might be in danger. His method for detecting the risk was unique, and I have never encountered anything like it since. How reliable it was, I cannot say. He had a wound in his leg, and whenever he was near people he suspected weren’t healthy, and he started to feel the symptoms, he claimed he could tell by the fact that his leg wound would sting and appear pale and white. As soon as he felt it sting, it was time for him to leave or take precautions, drinking the tonic he always kept on hand for that purpose. He noticed that his wound would sting many times while he was in the company of those who believed they were healthy and appeared so to each other. However, he would promptly stand up and announce, "Friends, someone in this room has the plague," and would instantly break up the gathering. This truly served as a warning sign to everyone that the plague cannot be avoided by those who mix freely in an infected town; people can carry it without knowing and unknowingly spread it to others. In this scenario, isolating the sick or controlling access to certain areas won’t work unless they can trace back and isolate everyone the sick have interacted with, even before they realized they were ill. No one knows how far back that needs to go or where to draw the line because no one knows when, where, or how they may have contracted the infection, or from whom.

This I take to be the reason which makes so many people talk of the air being corrupted and infected, and that they need not be cautious of whom they converse with, for that the contagion was in the air. I have seen them in strange agitations and surprises on this account. ‘I have never come near any infected body’, says the disturbed person; ‘I have conversed with none but sound, healthy people, and yet I have gotten the distemper!’ ‘I am sure I am struck from Heaven’, says another, and he falls to the serious part. Again, the first goes on exclaiming, ‘I have come near no infection or any infected person; I am sure it is the air. We draw in death when we breathe, and therefore ’tis the hand of God; there is no withstanding it.’ And this at last made many people, being hardened to the danger, grow less concerned at it; and less cautious towards the latter end of the time, and when it was come to its height, than they were at first. Then, with a kind of a Turkish predestinarianism, they would say, if it pleased God to strike them, it was all one whether they went abroad or stayed at home; they could not escape it, and therefore they went boldly about, even into infected houses and infected company; visited sick people; and, in short, lay in the beds with their wives or relations when they were infected. And what was the consequence, but the same that is the consequence in Turkey, and in those countries where they do those things—namely, that they were infected too, and died by hundreds and thousands?

I believe this is why so many people talk about the air being contaminated and infected, feeling like they don’t need to worry about who they talk to, since the contagion is in the air. I’ve seen them agitated and surprised about this. “I’ve never been near anyone infected,” says one troubled person, “I’ve only spoken to healthy people, and yet I still got sick!” “I’m sure I was struck from Heaven,” says another, becoming serious. Then the first one continues, “I haven’t been near any infection or anyone infected; I’m convinced it’s the air. We inhale death when we breathe, and it’s the hand of God; there’s no way to resist it.” In the end, this caused many people to become desensitized to the danger, growing less concerned and less cautious as time went on, even as the situation escalated. Then, with a sort of Turkish predestination mindset, they’d say that if God wanted to strike them, it didn’t matter whether they went out or stayed home; they couldn’t escape it, so they moved around boldly, even entering infected homes and mingling with sick people; they even shared beds with their wives or relatives when they were ill. And what happened as a result was just like what you see in Turkey and places where they do these things—namely, they got infected too and died by the hundreds and thousands.

I would be far from lessening the awe of the judgements of God and the reverence to His providence which ought always to be on our minds on such occasions as these. Doubtless the visitation itself is a stroke from Heaven upon a city, or country, or nation where it falls; a messenger of His vengeance, and a loud call to that nation or country or city to humiliation and repentance, according to that of the prophet Jeremiah (xviii. 7, 8): ‘At what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, and to pull down, and to destroy it; if that nation against whom I have pronounced turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them.’ Now to prompt due impressions of the awe of God on the minds of men on such occasions, and not to lessen them, it is that I have left those minutes upon record.

I don’t want to downplay the awe we should feel towards God’s judgments and the respect we owe to His guidance, which should always be present in our thoughts during moments like these. Undoubtedly, this kind of event is a divine intervention affecting a city, region, or nation; it is a message of His wrath and a strong reminder for that community to humble itself and seek forgiveness, as the prophet Jeremiah said (18:7, 8): “Whenever I announce that I will destroy a nation or a kingdom, if that nation repents of its evil, I will change my mind about the disaster I intended to bring.” The reason I’ve recorded these thoughts is to encourage people to reflect on their awe of God in situations like this, rather than diminishing it.

I say, therefore, I reflect upon no man for putting the reason of those things upon the immediate hand of God, and the appointment and direction of His providence; nay, on the contrary, there were many wonderful deliverances of persons from infection, and deliverances of persons when infected, which intimate singular and remarkable providence in the particular instances to which they refer; and I esteem my own deliverance to be one next to miraculous, and do record it with thankfulness.

I don't blame anyone for attributing the reasons for these events directly to God and His guiding hand; in fact, there are many incredible accounts of people being saved from infection and even those who were infected finding remarkable deliverance, which suggests a unique and noteworthy intervention in those specific situations. I consider my own survival to be almost miraculous, and I acknowledge it with gratitude.

But when I am speaking of the plague as a distemper arising from natural causes, we must consider it as it was really propagated by natural means; nor is it at all the less a judgement for its being under the conduct of human causes and effects; for, as the Divine Power has formed the whole scheme of nature and maintains nature in its course, so the same Power thinks fit to let His own actings with men, whether of mercy or judgement, to go on in the ordinary course of natural causes; and He is pleased to act by those natural causes as the ordinary means, excepting and reserving to Himself nevertheless a power to act in a supernatural way when He sees occasion. Now ’tis evident that in the case of an infection there is no apparent extraordinary occasion for supernatural operation, but the ordinary course of things appears sufficiently armed, and made capable of all the effects that Heaven usually directs by a contagion. Among these causes and effects, this of the secret conveyance of infection, imperceptible and unavoidable, is more than sufficient to execute the fierceness of Divine vengeance, without putting it upon supernaturals and miracle.

But when I talk about the plague as a disease that comes from natural causes, we need to look at how it actually spread through natural means; it’s still a judgment even if it’s influenced by human actions. Just as the Divine Power created the entire framework of nature and keeps it going, that same Power chooses to allow His interactions with humans, whether acts of mercy or judgment, to unfold through the usual flow of natural causes. He typically operates through these natural means, but He retains the ability to intervene in a supernatural way whenever He sees fit. In the case of an infection, it’s clear that there’s no obvious extraordinary reason for a supernatural intervention. The normal course of events seems well-equipped to bring about the effects that Heaven usually associates with contagions. Among all these causes and effects, the hidden transmission of infection, which is both subtle and unavoidable, is more than enough to carry out the intensity of Divine wrath without needing to resort to supernatural events or miracles.

The acute penetrating nature of the disease itself was such, and the infection was received so imperceptibly, that the most exact caution could not secure us while in the place. But I must be allowed to believe—and I have so many examples fresh in my memory to convince me of it, that I think none can resist their evidence—I say, I must be allowed to believe that no one in this whole nation ever received the sickness or infection but who received it in the ordinary way of infection from somebody, or the clothes or touch or stench of somebody that was infected before.

The severe and invasive nature of the disease was such that the infection was contracted so subtly that even the strictest precautions couldn't keep us safe while we were there. But I must be allowed to believe—and I have so many recent examples in my mind that convince me of this, I think no one can deny their validity—I say, I must be allowed to believe that no one in this entire nation ever got sick or became infected except through the usual means of infection from someone else, or from their clothing, touch, or odor.

The manner of its coming first to London proves this also, viz., by goods brought over from Holland, and brought thither from the Levant; the first breaking of it out in a house in Long Acre where those goods were carried and first opened; its spreading from that house to other houses by the visible unwary conversing with those who were sick; and the infecting the parish officers who were employed about the persons dead, and the like. These are known authorities for this great foundation point—that it went on and proceeded from person to person and from house to house, and no otherwise. In the first house that was infected there died four persons. A neighbour, hearing the mistress of the first house was sick, went to visit her, and went home and gave the distemper to her family, and died, and all her household. A minister, called to pray with the first sick person in the second house, was said to sicken immediately and die with several more in his house. Then the physicians began to consider, for they did not at first dream of a general contagion. But the physicians being sent to inspect the bodies, they assured the people that it was neither more or less than the plague, with all its terrifying particulars, and that it threatened an universal infection, so many people having already conversed with the sick or distempered, and having, as might be supposed, received infection from them, that it would be impossible to put a stop to it.

The way it first arrived in London also shows this, specifically through goods brought over from Holland and from the Levant. The outbreak started in a house on Long Acre where those goods were taken and opened for the first time. It spread from that house to other homes because of careless socializing with sick individuals, and it also infected the parish officials who dealt with the deceased, among others. These are well-known examples that support the key point—that it spread from person to person and from house to house, and not in any other way. In the first infected house, four people died. A neighbor, hearing that the mistress of that house was ill, went to visit her, then returned home and passed the illness to her family, who also perished. A minister, called to pray with the first sick individual in the second house, reportedly fell ill immediately and died along with several others in his home. Then the doctors began to take it seriously, as they hadn’t originally considered it a widespread contagion. However, when the doctors were sent to examine the bodies, they confirmed to the people that it was indeed the plague, with all its frightening details, and that it posed a risk of widespread infection, as so many people had already been in contact with those who were sick or unwell, making it likely that they had contracted the disease as well, and it would be impossible to stop it.

Here the opinion of the physicians agreed with my observation afterwards, namely, that the danger was spreading insensibly, for the sick could infect none but those that came within reach of the sick person; but that one man who may have really received the infection and knows it not, but goes abroad and about as a sound person, may give the plague to a thousand people, and they to greater numbers in proportion, and neither the person giving the infection or the persons receiving it know anything of it, and perhaps not feel the effects of it for several days after.

Here, the doctors agreed with my later observation that the danger was spreading unnoticed. The sick could only infect those who were close to them, but someone who has truly contracted the infection without realizing it and goes out acting like they're healthy could spread the plague to a thousand people. Those infected can then pass it on to even more people, and neither the person spreading the infection nor those receiving it would have any awareness of it, and they might not even feel the effects for several days afterward.

For example, many persons in the time of this visitation never perceived that they were infected till they found to their unspeakable surprise, the tokens come out upon them; after which they seldom lived six hours; for those spots they called the tokens were really gangrene spots, or mortified flesh in small knobs as broad as a little silver penny, and hard as a piece of callus or horn; so that, when the disease was come up to that length, there was nothing could follow but certain death; and yet, as I said, they knew nothing of their being infected, nor found themselves so much as out of order, till those mortal marks were upon them. But everybody must allow that they were infected in a high degree before, and must have been so some time, and consequently their breath, their sweat, their very clothes, were contagious for many days before. This occasioned a vast variety of cases which physicians would have much more opportunity to remember than I; but some came within the compass of my observation or hearing, of which I shall name a few.

For example, many people during this outbreak didn't realize they were infected until, to their shock, the symptoms appeared. After that, they often lived no more than six hours; those symptoms, which they called the tokens, were actually gangrene spots or dead flesh in small lumps about the size of a silver penny, hard as calluses or horn. So, when the disease progressed to that point, there was nothing left but certain death. Yet, as I mentioned, they were unaware of their infection and didn't even feel unwell until those deadly signs showed up. However, it's clear they had been infected for a while before that, meaning their breath, sweat, and even their clothes had been contagious for days prior. This led to a wide range of cases that doctors would have remembered better than I could. Still, some cases came to my attention, and I will mention a few.

A certain citizen who had lived safe and untouched till the month of September, when the weight of the distemper lay more in the city than it had done before, was mighty cheerful, and something too bold (as I think it was) in his talk of how secure he was, how cautious he had been, and how he had never come near any sick body. Says another citizen, a neighbour of his, to him one day, ‘Do not be too confident, Mr ——; it is hard to say who is sick and who is well, for we see men alive and well to outward appearance one hour, and dead the next.’ ‘That is true’, says the first man, for he was not a man presumptuously secure, but had escaped a long while—and men, as I said above, especially in the city began to be over-easy upon that score. ‘That is true,’ says he; ‘I do not think myself secure, but I hope I have not been in company with any person that there has been any danger in.’ ‘No?’ says his neighbour. ‘Was not you at the Bull Head Tavern in Gracechurch Street with Mr —— the night before last?’ ‘Yes,’ says the first, ‘I was; but there was nobody there that we had any reason to think dangerous.’ Upon which his neighbour said no more, being unwilling to surprise him; but this made him more inquisitive, and as his neighbour appeared backward, he was the more impatient, and in a kind of warmth says he aloud, ‘Why, he is not dead, is he?’ Upon which his neighbour still was silent, but cast up his eyes and said something to himself; at which the first citizen turned pale, and said no more but this, ‘Then I am a dead man too’, and went home immediately and sent for a neighbouring apothecary to give him something preventive, for he had not yet found himself ill; but the apothecary, opening his breast, fetched a sigh, and said no more but this, ‘Look up to God’; and the man died in a few hours.

A certain citizen who had lived safely and untouched until September, when the sickness struck the city harder than before, was feeling quite cheerful and a bit too bold (as I think) in his claims of how secure he was, how cautious he had been, and how he had never been near anyone sick. One day, a neighbor said to him, "Don’t get too confident, Mr. ——; it’s hard to tell who is sick and who is well, because we see people looking perfectly healthy one moment and dead the next." "That’s true," the first man replied, as he wasn’t overly confident, but had managed to stay safe for a long time—and people, as I mentioned, especially in the city, were starting to feel too relaxed about it. "That’s true," he said; "I don’t consider myself secure, but I hope I haven’t been around anyone who posed a danger." "No?" his neighbor replied. "Weren’t you at the Bull Head Tavern on Gracechurch Street with Mr. —— the night before last?" "Yes," the first man said, "I was; but there was nobody there that we had any reason to think was dangerous." At this, his neighbor didn’t say anything more, not wanting to alarm him; but it made him more curious, and since his neighbor seemed hesitant, he grew impatient and exclaimed, "He’s not dead, is he?" His neighbor remained silent but looked up, muttering something to himself; upon hearing this, the first citizen went pale and simply said, "Then I’m a dead man too," before going home immediately to call a nearby apothecary for something preventive, since he hadn’t felt sick yet. However, the apothecary, opening his chest and letting out a sigh, said nothing but, "Look up to God," and the man died within a few hours.

Now let any man judge from a case like this if it is possible for the regulations of magistrates, either by shutting up the sick or removing them, to stop an infection which spreads itself from man to man even while they are perfectly well and insensible of its approach, and may be so for many days.

Now let anyone consider a situation like this and decide if the rules set by officials, whether by isolating the sick or relocating them, can prevent an infection that spreads from person to person even when they feel completely fine and unaware of its arrival, sometimes for many days.

It may be proper to ask here how long it may be supposed men might have the seeds of the contagion in them before it discovered itself in this fatal manner, and how long they might go about seemingly whole, and yet be contagious to all those that came near them. I believe the most experienced physicians cannot answer this question directly any more than I can; and something an ordinary observer may take notice of, which may pass their observations. The opinion of physicians abroad seems to be that it may lie dormant in the spirits or in the blood-vessels a very considerable time. Why else do they exact a quarantine of those who came into their harbours and ports from suspected places? Forty days is, one would think, too long for nature to struggle with such an enemy as this, and not conquer it or yield to it. But I could not think, by my own observation, that they can be infected so as to be contagious to others above fifteen or sixteen days at furthest; and on that score it was, that when a house was shut up in the city and any one had died of the plague, but nobody appeared to be ill in the family for sixteen or eighteen days after, they were not so strict but that they would connive at their going privately abroad; nor would people be much afraid of them afterward, but rather think they were fortified the better, having not been vulnerable when the enemy was in their own house; but we sometimes found it had lain much longer concealed.

It might be worth asking how long men can carry the seeds of the infection before it shows up in this deadly way, and how long they can seem healthy while still being contagious to anyone nearby. I don’t think even the most experienced doctors can answer this question any better than I can; there are things an average observer might notice that could slip past their observations. Doctors abroad seem to agree that the contagion can stay dormant in the body or bloodstream for quite a while. Why else would they enforce a quarantine on those arriving at their harbors from suspected areas? Forty days seems like a long time for nature to battle such an enemy without either overcoming it or succumbing to it. However, based on my observations, I don't believe they can be contagious to others for more than about fifteen or sixteen days at most. That's why, when a house in the city was quarantined because someone died of the plague, and no one in the family appeared sick for another sixteen or eighteen days afterward, they were not overly strict and would even allow them to go out privately. People wouldn’t be too frightened of them after that; they’d think they were stronger, having not fallen ill when the threat was right in their home. But sometimes we found that the contagion had been hidden for much longer.

Upon the foot of all these observations I must say that though Providence seemed to direct my conduct to be otherwise, yet it is my opinion, and I must leave it as a prescription, viz., that the best physic against the plague is to run away from it. I know people encourage themselves by saying God is able to keep us in the midst of danger, and able to overtake us when we think ourselves out of danger; and this kept thousands in the town whose carcases went into the great pits by cartloads, and who, if they had fled from the danger, had, I believe, been safe from the disaster; at least ’tis probable they had been safe.

Based on all these observations, I have to say that even though it seems like fate was guiding my actions differently, I believe—and I’m going to state this as advice—that the best remedy against the plague is to run away from it. I know people reassure themselves by saying God can protect us in the midst of danger and can catch up with us when we think we’re safe. This belief kept thousands in the town, whose bodies were taken away by the cartload to the mass graves, and I believe that if they had fled from the danger, they might have been safe from the disaster; at least it’s likely they would have been.

And were this very fundamental only duly considered by the people on any future occasion of this or the like nature, I am persuaded it would put them upon quite different measures for managing the people from those that they took in 1665, or than any that have been taken abroad that I have heard of. In a word, they would consider of separating the people into smaller bodies, and removing them in time farther from one another—and not let such a contagion as this, which is indeed chiefly dangerous to collected bodies of people, find a million of people in a body together, as was very near the case before, and would certainly be the case if it should ever appear again.

If people took this very fundamental point into account in any future situation like this, I believe it would lead them to very different approaches for managing the population compared to what was done in 1665, or any other methods I've heard of being used elsewhere. In short, they would think about dividing the population into smaller groups and spacing them out over time—rather than allowing a contagion like this, which is mainly dangerous for large gatherings of people, to bring together a million individuals in one place, as was almost the case before, and would definitely be the result if it ever happens again.

The plague, like a great fire, if a few houses only are contiguous where it happens, can only burn a few houses; or if it begins in a single, or, as we call it, a lone house, can only burn that lone house where it begins. But if it begins in a close-built town or city and gets a head, there its fury increases: it rages over the whole place, and consumes all it can reach.

The plague, like a massive fire, can only destroy a few houses if it starts in just a few nearby ones. If it begins in a single house, it will only burn that one house. But if it starts in a densely built town or city and gains momentum, its power grows: it spreads everywhere and destroys everything in its path.

I could propose many schemes on the foot of which the government of this city, if ever they should be under the apprehensions of such another enemy (God forbid they should), might ease themselves of the greatest part of the dangerous people that belong to them; I mean such as the begging, starving, labouring poor, and among them chiefly those who, in case of a siege, are called the useless mouths; who being then prudently and to their own advantage disposed of, and the wealthy inhabitants disposing of themselves and of their servants and children, the city and its adjacent parts would be so effectually evacuated that there would not be above a tenth part of its people left together for the disease to take hold upon. But suppose them to be a fifth part, and that two hundred and fifty thousand people were left: and if it did seize upon them, they would, by their living so much at large, be much better prepared to defend themselves against the infection, and be less liable to the effects of it than if the same number of people lived close together in one smaller city such as Dublin or Amsterdam or the like.

I could suggest several plans that the government of this city could use, in case they ever feel threatened by a similar enemy (hopefully they won't), to reduce the number of dangerous individuals among their population. I'm referring to the begging, starving, and working poor, especially those labeled as "useless mouths" during a siege. If these individuals were wisely relocated for everyone's benefit, and the wealthy residents took themselves, their servants, and children with them, the city and surrounding areas would be so effectively cleared out that not more than one-tenth of the population would remain for any disease to spread among. But let's say a fifth of the population stayed, meaning about 250,000 people; if an outbreak occurred, those individuals would be much better positioned to defend themselves against the illness, as living more spread out would make them less vulnerable compared to if the same number of people lived closely together in a smaller city like Dublin or Amsterdam.

It is true hundreds, yea, thousands of families fled away at this last plague, but then of them, many fled too late, and not only died in their flight, but carried the distemper with them into the countries where they went and infected those whom they went among for safety; which confounded the thing, and made that be a propagation of the distemper which was the best means to prevent it; and this too is an evidence of it, and brings me back to what I only hinted at before, but must speak more fully to here, namely, that men went about apparently well many days after they had the taint of the disease in their vitals, and after their spirits were so seized as that they could never escape it, and that all the while they did so they were dangerous to others; I say, this proves that so it was; for such people infected the very towns they went through, as well as the families they went among; and it was by that means that almost all the great towns in England had the distemper among them, more or less, and always they would tell you such a Londoner or such a Londoner brought it down.

It’s true that hundreds, even thousands of families fled during the last plague, but many left too late. They not only died during their escape but also spread the disease to the places they sought refuge, infecting those they hoped to keep safe. This made the situation worse and turned what should have been a preventive measure into a way of spreading the illness. This also shows that people were often sick for days, sometimes longer, before realizing it, and even when they appeared fine, they were still a danger to others. This proves the point: these individuals infected the towns they passed through, as well as the families they visited. That’s how almost all of the major towns in England experienced the outbreak, each reporting that a particular Londoner had brought it with them.

It must not be omitted that when I speak of those people who were really thus dangerous, I suppose them to be utterly ignorant of their own conditions; for if they really knew their circumstances to be such as indeed they were, they must have been a kind of wilful murtherers if they would have gone abroad among healthy people—and it would have verified indeed the suggestion which I mentioned above, and which I thought seemed untrue: viz., that the infected people were utterly careless as to giving the infection to others, and rather forward to do it than not; and I believe it was partly from this very thing that they raised that suggestion, which I hope was not really true in fact.

It shouldn't be overlooked that when I talk about those people who were truly dangerous, I assume they were completely unaware of their own situation. Because if they actually understood how serious their circumstances were, they would have had to be kind of willful murderers to go out among healthy people—and it would have confirmed what I mentioned earlier, which I thought seemed untrue: that the infected individuals were completely careless about spreading the infection to others and more inclined to do so than not; and I think this very thing partly led them to promote that suggestion, which I hope wasn't actually true.

I confess no particular case is sufficient to prove a general, but I could name several people within the knowledge of some of their neighbours and families yet living who showed the contrary to an extreme. One man, a master of a family in my neighbourhood, having had the distemper, he thought he had it given him by a poor workman whom he employed, and whom he went to his house to see, or went for some work that he wanted to have finished; and he had some apprehensions even while he was at the poor workman’s door, but did not discover it fully; but the next day it discovered itself, and he was taken very in, upon which he immediately caused himself to be carried into an outbuilding which he had in his yard, and where there was a chamber over a workhouse (the man being a brazier). Here he lay, and here he died, and would be tended by none of his neighbours, but by a nurse from abroad; and would not suffer his wife, nor children, nor servants to come up into the room, lest they should be infected—but sent them his blessing and prayers for them by the nurse, who spoke it to them at a distance, and all this for fear of giving them the distemper; and without which he knew, as they were kept up, they could not have it.

I admit that no single case is enough to prove a general rule, but I could mention several people known by some of their neighbors and families who displayed the opposite to an extreme degree. One man, the head of a household in my neighborhood, believed he caught an illness from a poor worker he employed. He went to the worker's house either to see him or to get some work done. He felt uneasy even while he was at the worker’s door, though he didn't fully express it at the time. The next day, his illness became apparent, and he became very ill. He immediately had himself carried to an outbuilding in his yard, which had a room above a workshop since he was a metalworker. He lay there until he died, and no neighbors would tend to him, except for a nurse he hired from outside. He wouldn't allow his wife, children, or staff to come into the room for fear they might get infected—but he sent them his blessings and prayers through the nurse, who conveyed them to them from a distance, all out of fear of spreading the illness; and he knew that as long as they remained in a separate place, they couldn't catch it.

And here I must observe also that the plague, as I suppose all distempers do, operated in a different manner on differing constitutions; some were immediately overwhelmed with it, and it came to violent fevers, vomitings, insufferable headaches, pains in the back, and so up to ravings and ragings with those pains; others with swellings and tumours in the neck or groin, or armpits, which till they could be broke put them into insufferable agonies and torment; while others, as I have observed, were silently infected, the fever preying upon their spirits insensibly, and they seeing little of it till they fell into swooning, and faintings, and death without pain. I am not physician enough to enter into the particular reasons and manner of these differing effects of one and the same distemper, and of its differing operation in several bodies; nor is it my business here to record the observations which I really made, because the doctors themselves have done that part much more effectually than I can do, and because my opinion may in some things differ from theirs. I am only relating what I know, or have heard, or believe of the particular cases, and what fell within the compass of my view, and the different nature of the infection as it appeared in the particular cases which I have related; but this may be added too: that though the former sort of those cases, namely, those openly visited, were the worst for themselves as to pain—I mean those that had such fevers, vomitings, headaches, pains, and swellings, because they died in such a dreadful manner—yet the latter had the worst state of the disease; for in the former they frequently recovered, especially if the swellings broke; but the latter was inevitable death; no cure, no help, could be possible, nothing could follow but death. And it was worse also to others, because, as above, it secretly and unperceived by others or by themselves, communicated death to those they conversed with, the penetrating poison insinuating itself into their blood in a manner which it is impossible to describe, or indeed conceive.

And here I must point out that the plague, like all illnesses, affected different people in various ways. Some were immediately hit hard, suffering from severe fevers, vomiting, unbearable headaches, back pain, and even going into raving fits due to their suffering. Others experienced swellings and tumors in their neck, groin, or armpits, which caused extreme agony until they could be drained. Then there were those who were quietly infected; the fever would silently drain their energy, and they wouldn't realize how sick they were until they fainted, experiencing death without pain. I’m not a doctor, so I can’t explain the exact reasons for these varying effects of the same illness and how it impacted different bodies. It’s not my role to detail the observations I made, because the doctors have documented that much more effectively than I could, and my opinions may differ in some respects. I’m just sharing what I know, have heard, or believe about specific cases and the different ways the infection presented itself in the cases I've mentioned. However, I would add that even though the first type of cases, those who showed clear symptoms, were the most painful for the individuals — those with fevers, vomiting, headaches, pain, and swellings, who died in a horrifying manner — the second type faced a worse form of the disease. In the first group, many often recovered, especially if the swellings drained. But in the second group, death was certain; there was no cure, no help, only death. It was also worse for others because, as mentioned, this type secretly communicated death to those around them, with the toxic effects slipping unnoticed into their blood in a way that’s impossible to fully describe or understand.

This infecting and being infected without so much as its being known to either person is evident from two sorts of cases which frequently happened at that time; and there is hardly anybody living who was in London during the infection but must have known several of the cases of both sorts.

This infection and being infected without either person even realizing it is clear from two types of cases that often occurred back then; and almost everyone who was in London during the outbreak must have known about several cases of both types.

(1) Fathers and mothers have gone about as if they had been well, and have believed themselves to be so, till they have insensibly infected and been the destruction of their whole families, which they would have been far from doing if they had the least apprehensions of their being unsound and dangerous themselves. A family, whose story I have heard, was thus infected by the father; and the distemper began to appear upon some of them even before he found it upon himself. But searching more narrowly, it appeared he had been affected some time; and as soon as he found that his family had been poisoned by himself he went distracted, and would have laid violent hands upon himself, but was kept from that by those who looked to him, and in a few days died.

(1) Fathers and mothers have acted as if they were fine and believed it until they unknowingly infected and ruined their whole families, which they would never have done if they had any idea that they were unhealthy and dangerous themselves. I heard of a family that was infected by the father; the illness started showing up in some of them even before he noticed it in himself. But when he looked closer, it turned out he had been affected for a while; and as soon as he realized that he had poisoned his family, he went crazy and almost harmed himself, but was stopped by those who cared for him, and within a few days, he died.

(2) The other particular is, that many people having been well to the best of their own judgement, or by the best observation which they could make of themselves for several days, and only finding a decay of appetite, or a light sickness upon their stomachs; nay, some whose appetite has been strong, and even craving, and only a light pain in their heads, have sent for physicians to know what ailed them, and have been found, to their great surprise, at the brink of death: the tokens upon them, or the plague grown up to an incurable height.

(2) Another point is that many people, thinking they've been healthy based on their own judgment or the best observations they could make about themselves over several days, only notice a decrease in appetite or mild nausea. Some, even with a strong craving for food or just a mild headache, have called for doctors to figure out what was wrong, only to discover, to their shock, that they were on the verge of death: the signs of illness or the plague had advanced to an incurable stage.

It was very sad to reflect how such a person as this last mentioned above had been a walking destroyer perhaps for a week or a fortnight before that; how he had ruined those that he would have hazarded his life to save, and had been breathing death upon them, even perhaps in his tender kissing and embracings of his own children. Yet thus certainly it was, and often has been, and I could give many particular cases where it has been so. If then the blow is thus insensibly striking—if the arrow flies thus unseen, and cannot be discovered—to what purpose are all the schemes for shutting up or removing the sick people? Those schemes cannot take place but upon those that appear to be sick, or to be infected; whereas there are among them at the same time thousands of people who seem to be well, but are all that while carrying death with them into all companies which they come into.

It was really heartbreaking to think about how a person like the one mentioned earlier had been a walking disaster for maybe a week or two before that; how he had ruined the lives of those he would have risked his own life to save, while unwittingly spreading death, even in his gentle kisses and hugs with his own children. Yet that was indeed the case, and it has often been, and I could share many specific examples where this has happened. If the impact is so subtle—if the arrow flies unseen and can't be detected—then what's the point of all the plans to isolate or remove sick people? Those plans can only apply to those who appear to be sick or infected; meanwhile, there are thousands of people among them who seem perfectly fine but are unknowingly carrying death with them into every gathering they attend.

This frequently puzzled our physicians, and especially the apothecaries and surgeons, who knew not how to discover the sick from the sound; they all allowed that it was really so, that many people had the plague in their very blood, and preying upon their spirits, and were in themselves but walking putrefied carcases whose breath was infectious and their sweat poison, and yet were as well to look on as other people, and even knew it not themselves; I say, they all allowed that it was really true in fact, but they knew not how to propose a discovery.

This often confused our doctors, especially the pharmacists and surgeons, who didn’t know how to tell the sick from the healthy. They all agreed that it was true, that many people had the plague in their blood, affecting their spirits, and were essentially just walking decaying bodies, with breath that was infectious and sweat that was toxic. Yet, they looked just as healthy as everyone else and often didn’t even realize it themselves. I mean, they all acknowledged that it was indeed true, but they didn’t know how to come up with a way to find out.

My friend Dr Heath was of opinion that it might be known by the smell of their breath; but then, as he said, who durst smell to that breath for his information? since, to know it, he must draw the stench of the plague up into his own brain, in order to distinguish the smell! I have heard it was the opinion of others that it might be distinguished by the party’s breathing upon a piece of glass, where, the breath condensing, there might living creatures be seen by a microscope, of strange, monstrous, and frightful shapes, such as dragons, snakes, serpents, and devils, horrible to behold. But this I very much question the truth of, and we had no microscopes at that time, as I remember, to make the experiment with.

My friend Dr. Heath believed that you could tell by the smell of someone's breath, but as he pointed out, who would be brave enough to smell that breath for information? To know it, one would have to inhale the stench of the plague into their own lungs just to identify the smell! I’ve heard that others thought you could tell by having the person breathe on a piece of glass, where the breath would condense, potentially revealing living creatures under a microscope—strange, monstrous, and frightening shapes like dragons, snakes, serpents, and devils that are horrifying to look at. But I really doubt the truth of that, and as far as I remember, we didn’t have any microscopes at that time to try it out.

It was the opinion also of another learned man, that the breath of such a person would poison and instantly kill a bird; not only a small bird, but even a cock or hen, and that, if it did not immediately kill the latter, it would cause them to be roupy, as they call it; particularly that if they had laid any eggs at any time, they would be all rotten. But those are opinions which I never found supported by any experiments, or heard of others that had seen it; so I leave them as I find them; only with this remark, namely, that I think the probabilities are very strong for them.

Another knowledgeable person also believed that the breath of such an individual could poison and instantly kill a bird; not just a small bird, but even a rooster or hen. If it didn't kill the hen right away, it would make them sick, as they say; especially if they had laid any eggs, those would all be spoiled. However, I have never found any experiments to support these claims, nor have I heard of anyone who has witnessed it. So, I’ll just leave those opinions as they are; only noting that I think there’s a strong likelihood they could be true.

Some have proposed that such persons should breathe hard upon warm water, and that they would leave an unusual scum upon it, or upon several other things, especially such as are of a glutinous substance and are apt to receive a scum and support it.

Some have suggested that these individuals should exhale forcefully onto warm water, and that they would leave an unusual residue on it, or on various other surfaces, especially those that are sticky and prone to accumulating a film.

But from the whole I found that the nature of this contagion was such that it was impossible to discover it at all, or to prevent its spreading from one to another by any human skill.

But overall, I realized that the nature of this contagion was such that it was impossible to detect it at all, or to stop it from spreading from one person to another with any human skill.

Here was indeed one difficulty which I could never thoroughly get over to this time, and which there is but one way of answering that I know of, and it is this, viz., the first person that died of the plague was on December 20, or thereabouts, 1664, and in or about long Acre; whence the first person had the infection was generally said to be from a parcel of silks imported from Holland, and first opened in that house.

Here was indeed one difficulty that I never fully overcame, and there's only one way I know to explain it: the first person who died from the plague was around December 20, 1664, in or near Long Acre. It was commonly believed that the infection came from a shipment of silks imported from Holland, which was first unpacked in that house.

But after this we heard no more of any person dying of the plague, or of the distemper being in that place, till the 9th of February, which was about seven weeks after, and then one more was buried out of the same house. Then it was hushed, and we were perfectly easy as to the public for a great while; for there were no more entered in the weekly bill to be dead of the plague till the 22nd of April, when there was two more buried, not out of the same house, but out of the same street; and, as near as I can remember, it was out of the next house to the first. This was nine weeks asunder, and after this we had no more till a fortnight, and then it broke out in several streets and spread every way. Now the question seems to lie thus: Where lay the seeds of the infection all this while? How came it to stop so long, and not stop any longer? Either the distemper did not come immediately by contagion from body to body, or, if it did, then a body may be capable to continue infected without the disease discovering itself many days, nay, weeks together; even not a quarantine of days only, but soixantine; not only forty days, but sixty days or longer.

But after this, we didn’t hear about anyone else dying from the plague or that the disease was still in that area until February 9th, which was about seven weeks later, when one more person was buried from the same house. After that, it quieted down, and we felt completely at ease about the public situation for a long time; no more deaths from the plague were reported in the weekly tally until April 22nd, when two more people were buried, not from the same house, but from the same street, and as far as I remember, it was from the next house over from the first. This was a nine-week gap, and after that, we didn’t have any more cases until two weeks later, when it flared up again in several streets and spread everywhere. Now, the question seems to be: Where were the germs of the infection hiding all this time? How did it stop for so long, only to start again? Either the sickness didn’t spread directly from person to person, or if it did, then a person could remain infected without showing symptoms for many days, even weeks; not just a quarantine of a few days, but possibly as long as sixty days or more.

It is true there was, as I observed at first, and is well known to many yet living, a very cold winter and a long frost which continued three months; and this, the doctors say, might check the infection; but then the learned must allow me to say that if, according to their notion, the disease was (as I may say) only frozen up, it would like a frozen river have returned to its usual force and current when it thawed—whereas the principal recess of this infection, which was from February to April, was after the frost was broken and the weather mild and warm.

It's true that, as I first noticed, and as many still alive can attest, there was a very cold winter with a long frost that lasted three months. Doctors suggest this might have slowed the spread of the infection. However, I have to point out that if, according to their theory, the disease was merely “frozen,” it would’ve re-emerged with its normal intensity when it thawed—yet, the main peak of this infection, which occurred from February to April, happened after the frost ended and the weather became mild and warm.

But there is another way of solving all this difficulty, which I think my own remembrance of the thing will supply; and that is, the fact is not granted—namely, that there died none in those long intervals, viz., from the 20th of December to the 9th of February, and from thence to the 22nd of April. The weekly bills are the only evidence on the other side, and those bills were not of credit enough, at least with me, to support an hypothesis or determine a question of such importance as this; for it was our received opinion at that time, and I believe upon very good grounds, that the fraud lay in the parish officers, searchers, and persons appointed to give account of the dead, and what diseases they died of; and as people were very loth at first to have the neighbours believe their houses were infected, so they gave money to procure, or otherwise procured, the dead persons to be returned as dying of other distempers; and this I know was practised afterwards in many places, I believe I might say in all places where the distemper came, as will be seen by the vast increase of the numbers placed in the weekly bills under other articles of diseases during the time of the infection. For example, in the months of July and August, when the plague was coming on to its highest pitch, it was very ordinary to have from a thousand to twelve hundred, nay, to almost fifteen hundred a week of other distempers. Not that the numbers of those distempers were really increased to such a degree, but the great number of families and houses where really the infection was, obtained the favour to have their dead be returned of other distempers, to prevent the shutting up their houses. For example:—

But there’s another way to deal with all this trouble, which I think my own memory of the situation will help with; and that is, the fact that's not accepted—specifically, that no one died during those long breaks, from December 20th to February 9th, and from there to April 22nd. The weekly reports are the only evidence on the other side, and those reports weren’t credible enough, at least for me, to support a theory or settle such an important question as this; because it was our common belief at that time, and I think for very good reasons, that the deception lay with the parish officers, searchers, and those assigned to report the dead and the causes of their deaths; and since people were initially very reluctant to let neighbors believe their homes were infected, they paid money to have—or otherwise arranged for—the deceased to be reported as dying from other illnesses; and I know this was practiced later in many areas, I think I could say in all areas affected by the infection, as evidenced by the huge rise in numbers reported in the weekly records under other disease categories during the outbreak. For example, in July and August, when the plague was reaching its peak, it was quite common to have from a thousand to twelve hundred, or even almost fifteen hundred a week listed under other diseases. Not that the actual numbers of those illnesses really increased to such an extent, but the many families where the infection truly existed managed to get their deceased reported as having died from other causes, to avoid their homes being quarantined. For example:—

     Dead of other diseases beside the plague—
          From the 18th July  to  the 25th                     942
          ”        25th July       ”  1st August              1004
          ”         1st August     ”  8th                     1213
          ”         8th            ” 15th                     1439
          ”        15th            ” 22nd                     1331
          ”        22nd            ” 29th                     1394
          ”        29th            ”  5th September           1264
          ”         5th September to the 12th                 1056
          ”        12th            ” 19th                     1132
          ”        19th            ” 26th                      927
     Deaths from other diseases besides the plague—
          From July 18 to July 25                     942
          ”        July 25       ” August 1              1004
          ”         August 1     ” August 8                     1213
          ”         August 8            ” August 15                     1439
          ”        August 15            ” August 22                     1331
          ”        August 22            ” August 29                     1394
          ”        August 29            ” September 5           1264
          ”         September 5 to September 12                 1056
          ”        September 12            ” September 19                     1132
          ”        September 19            ” September 26                      927

Now it was not doubted but the greatest part of these, or a great part of them, were dead of the plague, but the officers were prevailed with to return them as above, and the numbers of some particular articles of distempers discovered is as follows:—

Now it was beyond doubt that most of these people, or a large portion of them, had died from the plague, but the officers were convinced to report them as mentioned above, and the counts of some specific types of illnesses found are as follows:—


               Aug.    Aug.    Aug.    Aug.    Aug.    Sept.  Sept.   Sept.
                1       8       15      22     29        5     12      19
               to 8   to 15   to 22   to 29 to Sept.5  to 12  to 19   to 26

     Fever     314     353     348     383     364     332     309     268
     Spotted   174     190     166     165     157      97     101      65
     Fever
     Surfeit    85      87      74      99      68      45      49      36
     Teeth      90     113     111     133     138     128     121     112
                ——      ——      ——      ——      ——      ——      ——      ——
               663     743     699     780     727     602     580     481
               Aug.    Aug.    Aug.    Aug.    Aug.    Sept.  Sept.   Sept.
                1       8       15      22     29        5     12      19
               to 8   to 15   to 22   to 29 to Sept.5  to 12  to 19   to 26

     Fever     314     353     348     383     364     332     309     268
     Spotted   174     190     166     165     157      97     101      65
     Fever
     Surfeit    85      87      74      99      68      45      49      36
     Teeth      90     113     111     133     138     128     121     112
                ——      ——      ——      ——      ——      ——      ——      ——
               663     743     699     780     727     602     580     481

There were several other articles which bore a proportion to these, and which, it is easy to perceive, were increased on the same account, as aged, consumptions, vomitings, imposthumes, gripes, and the like, many of which were not doubted to be infected people; but as it was of the utmost consequence to families not to be known to be infected, if it was possible to avoid it, so they took all the measures they could to have it not believed, and if any died in their houses, to get them returned to the examiners, and by the searchers, as having died of other distempers.

There were several other cases related to these, and it’s easy to see that they increased for the same reasons, like old age, illnesses, vomiting, abscesses, cramps, and similar issues, many of which were believed to be from infected individuals. However, since it was extremely important for families not to be seen as infected, if they could help it, they did everything they could to avoid that perception. If someone died in their homes, they worked to have the cause attributed to other ailments by the examiners and the searchers.

This, I say, will account for the long interval which, as I have said, was between the dying of the first persons that were returned in the bill to be dead of the plague and the time when the distemper spread openly and could not be concealed.

This, I say, will explain the long gap that, as I mentioned, occurred between the deaths of the first people listed in the bill as victims of the plague and the moment when the disease spread openly and could no longer be hidden.

Besides, the weekly bills themselves at that time evidently discover the truth; for, while there was no mention of the plague, and no increase after it had been mentioned, yet it was apparent that there was an increase of those distempers which bordered nearest upon it; for example, there were eight, twelve, seventeen of the spotted fever in a week, when there were none, or but very few, of the plague; whereas before, one, three, or four were the ordinary weekly numbers of that distemper. Likewise, as I observed before, the burials increased weekly in that particular parish and the parishes adjacent more than in any other parish, although there were none set down of the plague; all which tells us, that the infection was handed on, and the succession of the distemper really preserved, though it seemed to us at that time to be ceased, and to come again in a manner surprising.

Moreover, the weekly reports from that time clearly reveal the truth; while there was no mention of the plague and no increase after it was mentioned, it was obvious that there was a rise in those illnesses that were most closely related to it. For instance, there were eight, twelve, or even seventeen cases of spotted fever in a week when there were none, or very few, cases of the plague. In contrast, before that, the usual weekly counts for that illness were one, three, or four. Additionally, as I mentioned before, the number of burials in that specific parish and the nearby parishes increased weekly more than in any other area, even though none were recorded as plague-related. All of this indicates that the infection was still present, and the progression of the illness was genuinely maintained, even though it seemed to us at that moment to have disappeared and then returned in a surprising way.

It might be, also, that the infection might remain in other parts of the same parcel of goods which at first it came in, and which might not be perhaps opened, or at least not fully, or in the clothes of the first infected person; for I cannot think that anybody could be seized with the contagion in a fatal and mortal degree for nine weeks together, and support his state of health so well as even not to discover it to themselves; yet if it were so, the argument is the stronger in favour of what I am saying: namely, that the infection is retained in bodies apparently well, and conveyed from them to those they converse with, while it is known to neither the one nor the other.

It’s also possible that the infection could linger in other parts of the same shipment that it originally came in, which might not have been opened, or at least not completely, or in the clothes of the first infected person. I can’t believe that anyone could be seriously infected for nine weeks straight and still maintain their health without even realizing it. However, if that were the case, it only supports my point even more: that the infection can remain in seemingly healthy individuals and be passed on to those they interact with, all while being unnoticed by both.

Great were the confusions at that time upon this very account, and when people began to be convinced that the infection was received in this surprising manner from persons apparently well, they began to be exceeding shy and jealous of every one that came near them. Once, on a public day, whether a Sabbath-day or not I do not remember, in Aldgate Church, in a pew full of people, on a sudden one fancied she smelt an ill smell. Immediately she fancies the plague was in the pew, whispers her notion or suspicion to the next, then rises and goes out of the pew. It immediately took with the next, and so to them all; and every one of them, and of the two or three adjoining pews, got up and went out of the church, nobody knowing what it was offended them, or from whom.

There was a lot of confusion back then for this very reason, and when people started to believe that the infection could come unexpectedly from seemingly healthy individuals, they became extremely wary and protective of anyone who got close to them. One time, on a public day—whether it was a Sunday or not, I can’t remember—at Aldgate Church, in a pew packed with people, someone suddenly thought they smelled something bad. Instantly, she suspected that the plague was in the pew, whispered her concern to the person next to her, then stood up and left the pew. This idea quickly spread to the next person, and then to everyone else in the pew; soon, all of them, along with a couple of adjacent pews, stood up and left the church, with no one knowing exactly what had disturbed them or who caused it.

This immediately filled everybody’s mouths with one preparation or other, such as the old woman directed, and some perhaps as physicians directed, in order to prevent infection by the breath of others; insomuch that if we came to go into a church when it was anything full of people, there would be such a mixture of smells at the entrance that it was much more strong, though perhaps not so wholesome, than if you were going into an apothecary’s or druggist’s shop. In a word, the whole church was like a smelling-bottle; in one corner it was all perfumes; in another, aromatics, balsamics, and variety of drugs and herbs; in another, salts and spirits, as every one was furnished for their own preservation. Yet I observed that after people were possessed, as I have said, with the belief, or rather assurance, of the infection being thus carried on by persons apparently in health, the churches and meeting-houses were much thinner of people than at other times before that they used to be. For this is to be said of the people of London, that during the whole time of the pestilence the churches or meetings were never wholly shut up, nor did the people decline coming out to the public worship of God, except only in some parishes when the violence of the distemper was more particularly in that parish at that time, and even then no longer than it continued to be so.

This quickly had everyone using some kind of preparation, as directed by the old woman, and some maybe as recommended by doctors, to avoid infection from others' breath. So much so that if we tried to enter a church when it was crowded, there was such a mix of smells at the entrance that it was stronger, though maybe not as healthy, than walking into an apothecary or drugstore. In short, the whole church was like a perfume bottle; in one corner, it was all scents; in another, aromatics, balms, and different drugs and herbs; in another, salts and spirits, each person prepared for their own protection. Yet I noticed that after people became convinced—or rather assured—that the infection was spread by seemingly healthy individuals, the churches and meeting places were much less crowded than they had been before. It has to be said that during the entire time of the plague, the churches or gatherings were never completely closed, nor did people stop attending public worship, except in a few parishes where the disease was particularly severe at that time, and even then, only as long as it lasted.

Indeed nothing was more strange than to see with what courage the people went to the public service of God, even at that time when they were afraid to stir out of their own houses upon any other occasion; this, I mean, before the time of desperation, which I have mentioned already. This was a proof of the exceeding populousness of the city at the time of the infection, notwithstanding the great numbers that were gone into the country at the first alarm, and that fled out into the forests and woods when they were further terrified with the extraordinary increase of it. For when we came to see the crowds and throngs of people which appeared on the Sabbath-days at the churches, and especially in those parts of the town where the plague was abated, or where it was not yet come to its height, it was amazing. But of this I shall speak again presently. I return in the meantime to the article of infecting one another at first, before people came to right notions of the infection, and of infecting one another. People were only shy of those that were really sick, a man with a cap upon his head, or with clothes round his neck, which was the case of those that had swellings there. Such was indeed frightful; but when we saw a gentleman dressed, with his band on and his gloves in his hand, his hat upon his head, and his hair combed, of such we had not the least apprehensions, and people conversed a great while freely, especially with their neighbours and such as they knew. But when the physicians assured us that the danger was as well from the sound (that is, the seemingly sound) as the sick, and that those people who thought themselves entirely free were oftentimes the most fatal, and that it came to be generally understood that people were sensible of it, and of the reason of it; then, I say, they began to be jealous of everybody, and a vast number of people locked themselves up, so as not to come abroad into any company at all, nor suffer any that had been abroad in promiscuous company to come into their houses, or near them—at least not so near them as to be within the reach of their breath or of any smell from them; and when they were obliged to converse at a distance with strangers, they would always have preservatives in their mouths and about their clothes to repel and keep off the infection.

Nothing was stranger than to see how bravely people went to public worship, even when they were too scared to leave their homes for anything else. This was especially true before the desperation I mentioned earlier. It demonstrated just how densely populated the city was during the outbreak, despite the many who had fled to the countryside at the first signs of danger and those who hid in the woods when the threat intensified. When we saw the crowds at churches on Sundays, especially in parts of town where the plague had lessened or hadn’t peaked yet, it was astonishing. But I’ll address this further in a moment. For now, I’ll return to the topic of people infecting one another before they understood how the infection spread. Initially, people only avoided those who were visibly ill—like someone with a cap on their head or wrapped clothing around their neck, which was common for those with swellings. That was frightening. However, when we saw a well-dressed gentleman with his collar and gloves on, hat in place, and hair neatly combed, we felt no fear. People interacted freely, especially with neighbors and acquaintances. But when doctors warned us that the danger also came from seemingly healthy people—those who thought they were perfectly fine but were often the most dangerous—it started to sink in that everyone was at risk. Thus, people became suspicious of one another, and many locked themselves away, refusing to go out or allow anyone who had been in crowds to enter their homes or get too close—at least not close enough to breathe the same air or share any scents. And whenever they had to communicate with strangers from a distance, they would always keep protective substances in their mouths and on their clothes to fend off infection.

It must be acknowledged that when people began to use these cautions they were less exposed to danger, and the infection did not break into such houses so furiously as it did into others before; and thousands of families were preserved (speaking with due reserve to the direction of Divine Providence) by that means.

It should be noted that when people started using these precautions, they were less at risk, and the infection didn't invade their homes as aggressively as it did in others before; thousands of families were saved (with due respect to the guidance of Divine Providence) because of this.

But it was impossible to beat anything into the heads of the poor. They went on with the usual impetuosity of their tempers, full of outcries and lamentations when taken, but madly careless of themselves, foolhardy and obstinate, while they were well. Where they could get employment they pushed into any kind of business, the most dangerous and the most liable to infection; and if they were spoken to, their answer would be, ‘I must trust to God for that; if I am taken, then I am provided for, and there is an end of me’, and the like. Or thus, ‘Why, what must I do? I can’t starve. I had as good have the plague as perish for want. I have no work; what could I do? I must do this or beg.’ Suppose it was burying the dead, or attending the sick, or watching infected houses, which were all terrible hazards; but their tale was generally the same. It is true, necessity was a very justifiable, warrantable plea, and nothing could be better; but their way of talk was much the same where the necessities were not the same. This adventurous conduct of the poor was that which brought the plague among them in a most furious manner; and this, joined to the distress of their circumstances when taken, was the reason why they died so by heaps; for I cannot say I could observe one jot of better husbandry among them, I mean the labouring poor, while they were all well and getting money than there was before, but as lavish, as extravagant, and as thoughtless for tomorrow as ever; so that when they came to be taken sick they were immediately in the utmost distress, as well for want as for sickness, as well for lack of food as lack of health.

But it was impossible to get through to the poor. They continued with their usual fiery tempers, quick to complain and mourn when faced with danger, yet recklessly careless and stubborn when they felt fine. Wherever they could find work, they jumped into any kind of job, even the most dangerous and likely to spread illness; and if someone talked to them about it, they would respond with, “I have to trust God for that; if I get sick, then I’m taken care of, and that’s the end of it,” or something similar. Or they would say, “What else can I do? I can’t starve. I might as well catch the plague than die from hunger. I have no work; what else can I do? I either do this or beg.” Whether it was burying the dead, caring for the sick, or watching over infected houses—each was a terrible risk; but their reasoning was generally the same. It’s true that necessity is a very valid excuse, and there’s no question about that; but their way of thinking was often similar even when their situations didn’t warrant it. This reckless behavior of the poor contributed significantly to the spread of the plague among them in a brutal way; and this, along with their dire circumstances when they did get sick, was why they died in such large numbers. I can’t say I noticed any improvement in how they managed their resources, particularly the laboring poor, while they were healthy and earning money; they were just as wasteful, extravagant, and thoughtless about tomorrow as ever. So when they became ill, they found themselves in extreme distress, both from lack of resources and from sickness, suffering from both hunger and poor health.

This misery of the poor I had many occasions to be an eyewitness of, and sometimes also of the charitable assistance that some pious people daily gave to such, sending them relief and supplies both of food, physic, and other help, as they found they wanted; and indeed it is a debt of justice due to the temper of the people of that day to take notice here, that not only great sums, very great sums of money were charitably sent to the Lord Mayor and aldermen for the assistance and support of the poor distempered people, but abundance of private people daily distributed large sums of money for their relief, and sent people about to inquire into the condition of particular distressed and visited families, and relieved them; nay, some pious ladies were so transported with zeal in so good a work, and so confident in the protection of Providence in discharge of the great duty of charity, that they went about in person distributing alms to the poor, and even visiting poor families, though sick and infected, in their very houses, appointing nurses to attend those that wanted attending, and ordering apothecaries and surgeons, the first to supply them with drugs or plasters, and such things as they wanted; and the last to lance and dress the swellings and tumours, where such were wanting; giving their blessing to the poor in substantial relief to them, as well as hearty prayers for them.

I witnessed the misery of the poor on many occasions, as well as the charitable help that some kind people provided daily, sending them assistance and supplies of food, medicine, and other necessities as needed. It's only fair to acknowledge here that not only were large amounts of money generously sent to the Lord Mayor and aldermen to support the distressed, but many private individuals also distributed substantial sums for their relief. They sent people out to check on the specific conditions of struggling families and offered assistance. Furthermore, some devoted women were so passionate about this good work and had such faith in divine protection while fulfilling the essential duty of charity that they personally went out to give money to the poor and even visited sick and infected families in their own homes. They arranged for nurses to care for those in need and coordinated with pharmacists and surgeons to provide medicine, dress wounds, and treat swellings where necessary, giving not just material support but also prayers and blessings to the poor.

I will not undertake to say, as some do, that none of those charitable people were suffered to fall under the calamity itself; but this I may say, that I never knew any one of them that miscarried, which I mention for the encouragement of others in case of the like distress; and doubtless, if they that give to the poor lend to the Lord, and He will repay them, those that hazard their lives to give to the poor, and to comfort and assist the poor in such a misery as this, may hope to be protected in the work.

I won’t claim, like some do, that none of those charitable people faced the disaster themselves; however, I can say that I’ve never known any of them to fail, and I mention this to encourage others facing similar hardships. Certainly, if those who give to the poor lend to the Lord and He repays them, then those who risk their lives to help the poor and support them in such misery can expect to be protected in their efforts.

Nor was this charity so extraordinary eminent only in a few, but (for I cannot lightly quit this point) the charity of the rich, as well in the city and suburbs as from the country, was so great that, in a word, a prodigious number of people who must otherwise inevitably have perished for want as well as sickness were supported and subsisted by it; and though I could never, nor I believe any one else, come to a full knowledge of what was so contributed, yet I do believe that, as I heard one say that was a critical observer of that part, there was not only many thousand pounds contributed, but many hundred thousand pounds, to the relief of the poor of this distressed, afflicted city; nay, one man affirmed to me that he could reckon up above one hundred thousand pounds a week, which was distributed by the churchwardens at the several parish vestries by the Lord Mayor and aldermen in the several wards and precincts, and by the particular direction of the court and of the justices respectively in the parts where they resided, over and above the private charity distributed by pious bands in the manner I speak of; and this continued for many weeks together.

The generosity was not only remarkable among a select few; the charity from the wealthy, both in the city and surrounding areas as well as from the countryside, was so significant that, simply put, a large number of people who would have otherwise faced starvation and illness were supported and sustained by it. Although I could never fully grasp, nor do I believe anyone else could, the total amount that was given, I do think that, as I once heard from a keen observer of the situation, not just thousands of pounds were donated but many hundreds of thousands to help the poor in this troubled city. In fact, one individual claimed to me that he could tally over one hundred thousand pounds a week that was distributed by the churchwardens at various parish meetings, by the Lord Mayor and aldermen in their respective wards and neighborhoods, and by the specific instructions of the court and justices in the areas where they lived, in addition to the private charity given by charitable groups as I mentioned; and this went on for many weeks in a row.

I confess this is a very great sum; but if it be true that there was distributed in the parish of Cripplegate only, 17,800 in one week to the relief of the poor, as I heard reported, and which I really believe was true, the other may not be improbable.

I admit this is a huge amount; however, if it’s true that in the parish of Cripplegate alone, 17,800 was distributed in one week to help the poor, as I heard and genuinely believe was accurate, the other might not be unlikely.

It was doubtless to be reckoned among the many signal good providences which attended this great city, and of which there were many other worth recording,—I say, this was a very remarkable one, that it pleased God thus to move the hearts of the people in all parts of the kingdom so cheerfully to contribute to the relief and support of the poor at London, the good consequences of which were felt many ways, and particularly in preserving the lives and recovering the health of so many thousands, and keeping so many thousands of families from perishing and starving.

It was certainly one of the many significant blessings that surrounded this great city, and there were plenty of other noteworthy events worth mentioning. I mean, it was truly remarkable that God inspired people from all over the kingdom to generously contribute to the relief and support of the poor in London. The positive effects were felt in many ways, especially in saving lives and restoring the health of so many thousands, as well as preventing countless families from suffering and starving.

And now I am talking of the merciful disposition of Providence in this time of calamity, I cannot but mention again, though I have spoken several times of it already on other accounts, I mean that of the progression of the distemper; how it began at one end of the town, and proceeded gradually and slowly from one part to another, and like a dark cloud that passes over our heads, which, as it thickens and overcasts the air at one end, clears up at the other end; so, while the plague went on raging from west to east, as it went forwards east, it abated in the west, by which means those parts of the town which were not seized, or who were left, and where it had spent its fury, were (as it were) spared to help and assist the other; whereas, had the distemper spread itself over the whole city and suburbs, at once, raging in all places alike, as it has done since in some places abroad, the whole body of the people must have been overwhelmed, and there would have died twenty thousand a day, as they say there did at Naples; nor would the people have been able to have helped or assisted one another.

And now that I’m talking about the merciful nature of Providence during this time of disaster, I can’t help but mention again, even though I’ve already talked about it several times for other reasons, the way the disease progressed. It started at one end of the town and moved slowly and steadily from one area to another, like a dark cloud passing overhead. As it thickens and blocks the light at one end, it clears up at the other. So, while the plague was raging from west to east, as it advanced eastward, it lessened in the west. This meant that the parts of the town that weren’t affected, or where it had already done its worst, were effectively spared to help and support the others. If the disease had spread throughout the entire city and its suburbs all at once, raging in every place equally, as it has done in some places abroad since then, the entire population would have been overwhelmed, and there could have been twenty thousand deaths a day, as they say happened in Naples; and people wouldn’t have been able to help or support one another.

For it must be observed that where the plague was in its full force, there indeed the people were very miserable, and the consternation was inexpressible. But a little before it reached even to that place, or presently after it was gone, they were quite another sort of people; and I cannot but acknowledge that there was too much of that common temper of mankind to be found among us all at that time, namely, to forget the deliverance when the danger is past. But I shall come to speak of that part again.

It's important to note that where the plague was at its worst, the people were truly miserable, and the panic was overwhelming. However, just before it reached that area, or shortly after it left, they were completely different people. I can't help but admit that we all shared that common human tendency to forget the relief once the danger has passed. But I'll address that part again later.

It must not be forgot here to take some notice of the state of trade during the time of this common calamity, and this with respect to foreign trade, as also to our home trade.

It shouldn't be overlooked to mention the status of trade during this shared crisis, specifically regarding international trade as well as our domestic trade.

As to foreign trade, there needs little to be said. The trading nations of Europe were all afraid of us; no port of France, or Holland, or Spain, or Italy would admit our ships or correspond with us; indeed we stood on ill terms with the Dutch, and were in a furious war with them, but though in a bad condition to fight abroad, who had such dreadful enemies to struggle with at home.

When it comes to foreign trade, not much needs to be said. The trading nations of Europe were all scared of us; no port in France, Holland, Spain, or Italy would allow our ships or communicate with us. In fact, we were on bad terms with the Dutch and were in a fierce war with them. Despite being in a tough situation to fight abroad, we had such terrible enemies to deal with at home.

Our merchants were accordingly at a full stop; their ships could go nowhere—that is to say, to no place abroad; their manufactures and merchandise—that is to say, of our growth—would not be touched abroad. They were as much afraid of our goods as they were of our people; and indeed they had reason: for our woollen manufactures are as retentive of infection as human bodies, and if packed up by persons infected, would receive the infection and be as dangerous to touch as a man would be that was infected; and therefore, when any English vessel arrived in foreign countries, if they did take the goods on shore, they always caused the bales to be opened and aired in places appointed for that purpose. But from London they would not suffer them to come into port, much less to unlade their goods, upon any terms whatever, and this strictness was especially used with them in Spain and Italy. In Turkey and the islands of the Arches indeed, as they are called, as well those belonging to the Turks as to the Venetians, they were not so very rigid. In the first there was no obstruction at all; and four ships which were then in the river loading for Italy—that is, for Leghorn and Naples—being denied product, as they call it, went on to Turkey, and were freely admitted to unlade their cargo without any difficulty; only that when they arrived there, some of their cargo was not fit for sale in that country; and other parts of it being consigned to merchants at Leghorn, the captains of the ships had no right nor any orders to dispose of the goods; so that great inconveniences followed to the merchants. But this was nothing but what the necessity of affairs required, and the merchants at Leghorn and Naples having notice given them, sent again from thence to take care of the effects which were particularly consigned to those ports, and to bring back in other ships such as were improper for the markets at Smyrna and Scanderoon.

Our merchants were completely stuck; their ships couldn't go anywhere—specifically, not to any foreign ports. Their products and goods—which are from our own resources—wouldn't be handled abroad. They were as wary of our products as they were of our people; and honestly, they had good reason: our wool products can carry infections just like humans can, so if packed by infected individuals, they would be just as risky to touch as an infected person. Therefore, whenever an English ship arrived in other countries, if they did accept the goods, they always required the bales to be unpacked and aired in designated areas. However, they wouldn't let these ships enter ports in London, let alone unload their goods, no matter what. This strict policy was especially enforced in Spain and Italy. In Turkey and the Aegean Islands, which include those owned by the Turks and the Venetians, they were not as stringent. In Turkey, there were no barriers at all; four ships that were loading for Italy—that is, for Livorno and Naples—were denied clearance, as they say, and ended up going to Turkey, where they were allowed to unload their cargo without any issues. The only problem was that some of their cargo wasn't suitable for sale in that country, and part of it was meant for merchants in Livorno, so the ship captains had no authority or orders to sell those goods, leading to significant challenges for the merchants. But this was simply a consequence of the situation, and the merchants in Livorno and Naples were notified and sent someone to manage the goods specifically meant for those ports and arrange to bring back items that weren't appropriate for the markets in Smyrna and Scanderoon.

The inconveniences in Spain and Portugal were still greater, for they would by no means suffer our ships, especially those from London, to come into any of their ports, much less to unlade. There was a report that one of our ships having by stealth delivered her cargo, among which was some bales of English cloth, cotton, kerseys, and such-like goods, the Spaniards caused all the goods to be burned, and punished the men with death who were concerned in carrying them on shore. This, I believe, was in part true, though I do not affirm it; but it is not at all unlikely, seeing the danger was really very great, the infection being so violent in London.

The issues in Spain and Portugal were even worse because they absolutely refused to let our ships, especially those from London, enter their ports, let alone unload any goods. There was a rumor that one of our ships secretly delivered its cargo, which included bales of English cloth, cotton, kerseys, and similar items. The Spaniards allegedly had all the goods burned and executed the men involved in bringing them ashore. I believe this was partly true, although I can't confirm it; however, it’s not at all unlikely given the serious risk involved, especially with the infection being so severe in London.

I heard likewise that the plague was carried into those countries by some of our ships, and particularly to the port of Faro in the kingdom of Algarve, belonging to the King of Portugal, and that several persons died of it there; but it was not confirmed.

I also heard that the plague was brought to those countries by some of our ships, especially to the port of Faro in the Algarve kingdom, which belongs to the King of Portugal, and that several people died from it there; but that was not confirmed.

On the other hand, though the Spaniards and Portuguese were so shy of us, it is most certain that the plague (as has been said) keeping at first much at that end of the town next Westminster, the merchandising part of the town (such as the city and the water-side) was perfectly sound till at least the beginning of July, and the ships in the river till the beginning of August; for to the 1st of July there had died but seven within the whole city, and but sixty within the liberties, but one in all the parishes of Stepney, Aldgate, and Whitechappel, and but two in the eight parishes of Southwark. But it was the same thing abroad, for the bad news was gone over the whole world that the city of London was infected with the plague, and there was no inquiring there how the infection proceeded, or at which part of the town it was begun or was reached to.

On the other hand, even though the Spaniards and Portuguese were quite cautious around us, it’s clear that the plague (as mentioned) was initially more concentrated at that end of the town near Westminster. The commercial areas of the town, like the city and riverside, remained largely unaffected until at least early July, and the ships in the river were safe until early August. By July 1st, only seven people had died in the entire city and just sixty in the surrounding areas. Only one person died across all the parishes of Stepney, Aldgate, and Whitechapel, and there were only two deaths in the eight parishes of Southwark. However, news of the outbreak had spread around the globe, and no one was checking to see how the infection was progressing or where it had started.

Besides, after it began to spread it increased so fast, and the bills grew so high all on a sudden, that it was to no purpose to lessen the report of it, or endeavour to make the people abroad think it better than it was; the account which the weekly bills gave in was sufficient; and that there died two thousand to three or four thousand a week was sufficient to alarm the whole trading part of the world; and the following time, being so dreadful also in the very city itself, put the whole world, I say, upon their guard against it.

Besides, once it started spreading, it escalated so quickly, and the death toll rose so high all at once, that there was no point in downplaying the situation or trying to convince people outside that it was better than it really was; the information provided in the weekly reports was enough, and the fact that two to four thousand people were dying each week was alarming to everyone involved in trade. The subsequent wave, being so horrifying right in the city itself, put the entire world on high alert against it.

You may be sure, also, that the report of these things lost nothing in the carriage. The plague was itself very terrible, and the distress of the people very great, as you may observe of what I have said. But the rumour was infinitely greater, and it must not be wondered that our friends abroad (as my brother’s correspondents in particular were told there, namely, in Portugal and Italy, where he chiefly traded) [said] that in London there died twenty thousand in a week; that the dead bodies lay unburied by heaps; that the living were not sufficient to bury the dead or the sound to look after the sick; that all the kingdom was infected likewise, so that it was an universal malady such as was never heard of in those parts of the world; and they could hardly believe us when we gave them an account how things really were, and how there was not above one-tenth part of the people dead; that there was 500,000, left that lived all the time in the town; that now the people began to walk the streets again, and those who were fled to return, there was no miss of the usual throng of people in the streets, except as every family might miss their relations and neighbours, and the like. I say they could not believe these things; and if inquiry were now to be made in Naples, or in other cities on the coast of Italy, they would tell you that there was a dreadful infection in London so many years ago, in which, as above, there died twenty thousand in a week, &c., just as we have had it reported in London that there was a plague in the city of Naples in the year 1656, in which there died 20,000 people in a day, of which I have had very good satisfaction that it was utterly false.

You can be sure that the news about these events didn’t lose any intensity in transit. The plague was truly horrific, and the suffering of the people was immense, as you can see from what I’ve shared. But the rumors were even more extreme, and it's not surprising that our friends abroad—especially my brother's contacts in Portugal and Italy, where he primarily traded—claimed that in London, twenty thousand people died in a week; that dead bodies were piled up without burial; that there weren’t enough living people to bury the dead or to care for the sick; and that the entire kingdom was also infected, making it a widespread disease unlike anything heard of in those parts of the world. They could hardly believe us when we explained how things really were and that only about one-tenth of the population had died; that there were 500,000 people who remained alive in the city the whole time; that people had started walking the streets again, and those who had fled began to return, so there was no lack of the usual crowd in the streets, except for the families mourning their relatives and neighbors, and so on. I say they couldn’t believe these things; and if inquiries were made in Naples or other cities along the Italian coast, they would tell you there had been a terrible outbreak in London so many years ago, where it was claimed that twenty thousand died in a week, just like we’ve heard reports in London about a plague in Naples in 1656, where supposedly 20,000 people died in a single day, which I can assure you was completely false.

But these extravagant reports were very prejudicial to our trade, as well as unjust and injurious in themselves, for it was a long time after the plague was quite over before our trade could recover itself in those parts of the world; and the Flemings and Dutch (but especially the last) made very great advantages of it, having all the market to themselves, and even buying our manufactures in several parts of England where the plague was not, and carrying them to Holland and Flanders, and from thence transporting them to Spain and to Italy as if they had been of their own making.

But these exaggerated reports were really damaging to our trade, as well as unfair and harmful in themselves. It took a long time after the plague was completely over for our trade to bounce back in those regions of the world; and the Flemish and Dutch, especially the latter, gained a lot from it, having the entire market to themselves. They even bought our products in various parts of England where the plague didn't hit, then took them to Holland and Flanders, and from there shipped them to Spain and Italy as if they had made them themselves.

But they were detected sometimes and punished: that is to say, their goods confiscated and ships also; for if it was true that our manufactures as well as our people were infected, and that it was dangerous to touch or to open and receive the smell of them, then those people ran the hazard by that clandestine trade not only of carrying the contagion into their own country, but also of infecting the nations to whom they traded with those goods; which, considering how many lives might be lost in consequence of such an action, must be a trade that no men of conscience could suffer themselves to be concerned in.

But sometimes they got caught and faced consequences: their goods were seized and their ships taken as well. If it was true that our products and our people were contaminated, making it risky to touch or even smell them, then those involved in that secret trade faced the danger not only of bringing the infection back to their own country but also of spreading it to the nations they traded with. Given the potential loss of so many lives from such actions, it was a trade that no person of integrity could morally engage in.

I do not take upon me to say that any harm was done, I mean of that kind, by those people. But I doubt I need not make any such proviso in the case of our own country; for either by our people of London, or by the commerce which made their conversing with all sorts of people in every country and of every considerable town necessary, I say, by this means the plague was first or last spread all over the kingdom, as well in London as in all the cities and great towns, especially in the trading manufacturing towns and seaports; so that, first or last, all the considerable places in England were visited more or less, and the kingdom of Ireland in some places, but not so universally. How it fared with the people in Scotland I had no opportunity to inquire.

I can’t say for sure that any harm was caused by those people. However, I don’t think I need to make such a statement about our own country. Whether it was the people of London or the trade that required them to interact with all kinds of people from every country and major town, this is how the plague eventually spread throughout the kingdom, affecting London as well as all the cities and large towns, especially the trading, manufacturing towns and seaports. So, in one way or another, all the significant places in England were impacted to some degree, and some areas in the kingdom of Ireland were affected too, but not as widely. I didn’t have the chance to find out how it was for the people in Scotland.

It is to be observed that while the plague continued so violent in London, the outports, as they are called, enjoyed a very great trade, especially to the adjacent countries and to our own plantations. For example, the towns of Colchester, Yarmouth, and Hull, on that side of England, exported to Holland and Hamburg the manufactures of the adjacent countries for several months after the trade with London was, as it were, entirely shut up; likewise the cities of Bristol and Exeter, with the port of Plymouth, had the like advantage to Spain, to the Canaries, to Guinea, and to the West Indies, and particularly to Ireland; but as the plague spread itself every way after it had been in London to such a degree as it was in August and September, so all or most of those cities and towns were infected first or last; and then trade was, as it were, under a general embargo or at a full stop—as I shall observe further when I speak of our home trade.

It's worth noting that while the plague was raging in London, the outports, as they are called, were thriving with trade, especially with nearby countries and our own colonies. For instance, the towns of Colchester, Yarmouth, and Hull exported goods to Holland and Hamburg for several months after trade with London had pretty much shut down. Similarly, the cities of Bristol and Exeter, along with the port of Plymouth, enjoyed similar trade with Spain, the Canaries, Guinea, the West Indies, and particularly Ireland. However, as the plague spread from London in August and September, almost all those cities and towns eventually got infected. Trade then came to a complete halt, as I will discuss further when I talk about our domestic trade.

One thing, however, must be observed: that as to ships coming in from abroad (as many, you may be sure, did) some who were out in all parts of the world a considerable while before, and some who when they went out knew nothing of an infection, or at least of one so terrible—these came up the river boldly, and delivered their cargoes as they were obliged to do, except just in the two months of August and September, when the weight of the infection lying, as I may say, all below Bridge, nobody durst appear in business for a while. But as this continued but for a few weeks, the homeward-bound ships, especially such whose cargoes were not liable to spoil, came to an anchor for a time short of the Pool,[5] or fresh-water part of the river, even as low as the river Medway, where several of them ran in; and others lay at the Nore, and in the Hope below Gravesend. So that by the latter end of October there was a very great fleet of homeward-bound ships to come up, such as the like had not been known for many years.

One thing, however, must be noted: as for ships arriving from abroad (and many, you can be sure, did), some had been out in all parts of the world for quite a while before, and some who left had no knowledge of an infection, or at least not one as severe—these ships came up the river confidently and delivered their cargoes as they were required to, except during the two months of August and September, when the heavy infection, as I might say, was all below Bridge, and nobody dared to conduct business for a while. But since this lasted for only a few weeks, the ships heading home, especially those carrying cargoes that wouldn't spoil, anchored for a short time before reaching the Pool, [5] or the fresh-water part of the river, even as far down as the river Medway, where several of them docked; and others remained at the Nore and in the Hope below Gravesend. By the end of October, there was a huge fleet of homeward-bound ships ready to come up, such as had not been seen for many years.

[5] That part of the river where the ships lie up when they come home is called the Pool, and takes in all the river on both sides of the water, from the Tower to Cuckold’s Point and Limehouse. [Footnote in the original.]

[5] The section of the river where ships dock when they return is known as the Pool, covering the entire river on both sides from the Tower to Cuckold’s Point and Limehouse. [Footnote in the original.]

Two particular trades were carried on by water-carriage all the while of the infection, and that with little or no interruption, very much to the advantage and comfort of the poor distressed people of the city: and those were the coasting trade for corn and the Newcastle trade for coals.

Two specific trades continued to operate by water transport throughout the infection, with little to no interruption, greatly benefiting and comforting the struggling people of the city: the coastal trade for corn and the Newcastle trade for coal.

The first of these was particularly carried on by small vessels from the port of Hull and other places on the Humber, by which great quantities of corn were brought in from Yorkshire and Lincolnshire. The other part of this corn-trade was from Lynn, in Norfolk, from Wells and Burnham, and from Yarmouth, all in the same county; and the third branch was from the river Medway, and from Milton, Feversham, Margate, and Sandwich, and all the other little places and ports round the coast of Kent and Essex.

The first of these was mainly handled by small ships from the port of Hull and other areas along the Humber, which brought in large amounts of grain from Yorkshire and Lincolnshire. The second part of this grain trade came from Lynn in Norfolk, as well as Wells, Burnham, and Yarmouth, all in the same county. The third branch was from the River Medway and towns like Milton, Feversham, Margate, and Sandwich, along with other smaller towns and ports along the coast of Kent and Essex.

There was also a very good trade from the coast of Suffolk with corn, butter, and cheese; these vessels kept a constant course of trade, and without interruption came up to that market known still by the name of Bear Key, where they supplied the city plentifully with corn when land-carriage began to fail, and when the people began to be sick of coming from many places in the country.

There was also a strong trade from the coast of Suffolk with corn, butter, and cheese; these ships maintained a steady trade route and consistently arrived at the market still known as Bear Key, where they supplied the city abundantly with corn when land transport started to fail, and when people grew tired of traveling from various places in the countryside.

This also was much of it owing to the prudence and conduct of the Lord Mayor, who took such care to keep the masters and seamen from danger when they came up, causing their corn to be bought off at any time they wanted a market (which, however, was very seldom), and causing the corn-factors immediately to unlade and deliver the vessels loaden with corn, that they had very little occasion to come out of their ships or vessels, the money being always carried on board to them and put into a pail of vinegar before it was carried.

This was largely due to the wisdom and actions of the Lord Mayor, who was very careful to protect the masters and seamen from danger when they arrived. He arranged for their corn to be purchased whenever they needed to sell it (which was quite rare) and made sure that the corn factors quickly unloaded and delivered the ships full of corn. As a result, the crew had little reason to leave their ships, with the money being brought on board and placed into a vinegar bucket before it was handed over.

The second trade was that of coals from Newcastle-upon-Tyne, without which the city would have been greatly distressed; for not in the streets only, but in private houses and families, great quantities of coals were then burnt, even all the summer long and when the weather was hottest, which was done by the advice of the physicians. Some indeed opposed it, and insisted that to keep the houses and rooms hot was a means to propagate the temper, which was a fermentation and heat already in the blood; that it was known to spread and increase in hot weather and abate in cold; and therefore they alleged that all contagious distempers are the worse for heat, because the contagion was nourished and gained strength in hot weather, and was, as it were, propagated in heat.

The second trade was for coal from Newcastle-upon-Tyne, without which the city would have been in serious trouble. People burned large amounts of coal, not just on the streets but also in their homes, even during the summer and in the hottest weather, as advised by physicians. Some disagreed, arguing that keeping homes and rooms hot would help spread the sickness, which was a kind of heat already present in the blood. They believed it was known that diseases spread more in hot weather and decreased in the cold. Therefore, they claimed that all contagious illnesses became worse in heat because the contagion thrived and gained strength in warm weather, and essentially spread in high temperatures.

Others said they granted that heat in the climate might propagate infection—as sultry, hot weather fills the air with vermin and nourishes innumerable numbers and kinds of venomous creatures which breed in our food, in the plants, and even in our bodies, by the very stench of which infection may be propagated; also that heat in the air, or heat of weather, as we ordinarily call it, makes bodies relax and faint, exhausts the spirits, opens the pores, and makes us more apt to receive infection, or any evil influence, be it from noxious pestilential vapours or any other thing in the air; but that the heat of fire, and especially of coal fires kept in our houses, or near us, had a quite different operation; the heat being not of the same kind, but quick and fierce, tending not to nourish but to consume and dissipate all those noxious fumes which the other kind of heat rather exhaled and stagnated than separated and burnt up. Besides, it was alleged that the sulphurous and nitrous particles that are often found to be in the coal, with that bituminous substance which burns, are all assisting to clear and purge the air, and render it wholesome and safe to breathe in after the noxious particles, as above, are dispersed and burnt up.

Others acknowledged that hot weather might spread infection since warm, humid conditions fill the air with pests and promote countless harmful creatures that breed in our food, plants, and even within our bodies, which can spread infection through their foul smell. They argued that heat in the air, or hot weather as we commonly refer to it, causes our bodies to relax and faint, drains our energy, opens our pores, and makes us more susceptible to infections or any negative influences, whether from harmful, disease-causing vapors or anything else in the air. However, they claimed that the heat from fires, especially coal fires used in our homes, operates differently; this heat is not the same but is intense and fierce, aiming not to nurture but to destroy and dissipate the harmful fumes that other types of heat tend to exhale and let stagnate rather than burn away. Additionally, it was pointed out that the sulfurous and nitrogenous particles often present in coal, along with the bituminous substance that burns, all help to purify the air and make it healthy and safe to breathe after the harmful particles, as mentioned before, are dispersed and incinerated.

The latter opinion prevailed at that time, and, as I must confess, I think with good reason; and the experience of the citizens confirmed it, many houses which had constant fires kept in the rooms having never been infected at all; and I must join my experience to it, for I found the keeping good fires kept our rooms sweet and wholesome, and I do verily believe made our whole family so, more than would otherwise have been.

The latter opinion won out back then, and I have to admit, I think it was for good reason; the experiences of the people supported it. Many homes that always had fires going in their rooms never got infected at all. I have to add my own experience to this, as I found that having good fires kept our rooms fresh and healthy, and I truly believe it made our entire family healthier than we would have been otherwise.

But I return to the coals as a trade. It was with no little difficulty that this trade was kept open, and particularly because, as we were in an open war with the Dutch at that time, the Dutch capers at first took a great many of our collier-ships, which made the rest cautious, and made them to stay to come in fleets together. But after some time the capers were either afraid to take them, or their masters, the States, were afraid they should, and forbade them, lest the plague should be among them, which made them fare the better.

But I return to the coal trade. It wasn't easy to keep this trade going, especially since we were at war with the Dutch at that time. The Dutch pirates initially captured many of our coal ships, which made the others cautious and prompted them to travel in fleets. But after a while, the pirates either grew fearful of attacking them, or their leaders, the States, were worried about the risks and forbade it, fearing they might bring the plague among them, which turned out to be beneficial for us.

For the security of those northern traders, the coal-ships were ordered by my Lord Mayor not to come up into the Pool above a certain number at a time, and ordered lighters and other vessels such as the woodmongers (that is, the wharf-keepers or coal-sellers) furnished, to go down and take out the coals as low as Deptford and Greenwich, and some farther down.

For the safety of the northern traders, the Lord Mayor instructed that no more than a certain number of coal ships could enter the Pool at one time. He also directed that lighters and other vessels, like those used by the woodmongers (the wharf-keepers or coal-sellers), should go down to collect the coal as far as Deptford and Greenwich, and even further down.

Others delivered great quantities of coals in particular places where the ships could come to the shore, as at Greenwich, Blackwall, and other places, in vast heaps, as if to be kept for sale; but were then fetched away after the ships which brought them were gone, so that the seamen had no communication with the river-men, nor so much as came near one another.

Others delivered large amounts of coal in specific locations where ships could reach the shore, like Greenwich, Blackwall, and other places, in huge piles, seemingly for sale; but after the ships that brought them left, they were taken away, so the sailors had no contact with the river workers, and they didn’t even come close to each other.

Yet all this caution could not effectually prevent the distemper getting among the colliery: that is to say among the ships, by which a great many seamen died of it; and that which was still worse was, that they carried it down to Ipswich and Yarmouth, to Newcastle-upon-Tyne, and other places on the coast—where, especially at Newcastle and at Sunderland, it carried off a great number of people.

Yet all this caution could not effectively prevent the sickness from spreading among the colliery; that is to say, among the ships, through which many sailors died from it. Even worse, they took it to Ipswich and Yarmouth, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, and other coastal areas—where, especially in Newcastle and Sunderland, it caused a significant number of deaths.

The making so many fires, as above, did indeed consume an unusual quantity of coals; and that upon one or two stops of the ships coming up, whether by contrary weather or by the interruption of enemies I do not remember, but the price of coals was exceeding dear, even as high as 4 l. a chalder; but it soon abated when the ships came in, and as afterwards they had a freer passage, the price was very reasonable all the rest of that year.

The numerous fires mentioned above did use up an unusual amount of coal; and after one or two stops of the ships coming in, whether due to bad weather or enemy interference, I can't recall, but the price of coal got extremely high, even reaching £4 a chalder; however, it quickly went down when the ships arrived, and as they had a smoother journey afterward, the price remained very reasonable for the rest of that year.

The public fires which were made on these occasions, as I have calculated it, must necessarily have cost the city about 200 chalders of coals a week, if they had continued, which was indeed a very great quantity; but as it was thought necessary, nothing was spared. However, as some of the physicians cried them down, they were not kept alight above four or five days. The fires were ordered thus:—

The public fires that were set during these events, as I've estimated, would have cost the city around 200 chalders of coal each week if they had continued, which is indeed a huge amount; but since it was deemed necessary, no expense was spared. However, because some of the doctors opposed them, they weren't kept burning for more than four or five days. The fires were ordered like this:—

One at the Custom House, one at Billingsgate, one at Queenhith, and one at the Three Cranes; one in Blackfriars, and one at the gate of Bridewell; one at the corner of Leadenhal Street and Gracechurch; one at the north and one at the south gate of the Royal Exchange; one at Guild Hall, and one at Blackwell Hall gate; one at the Lord Mayor’s door in St Helen’s, one at the west entrance into St Paul’s, and one at the entrance into Bow Church. I do not remember whether there was any at the city gates, but one at the Bridge-foot there was, just by St Magnus Church.

One at the Custom House, one at Billingsgate, one at Queenhith, and one at the Three Cranes; one in Blackfriars, and one at the Bridewell gate; one at the corner of Leadenhall Street and Gracechurch; one at the north and one at the south gate of the Royal Exchange; one at Guild Hall, and one at the Blackwell Hall gate; one at the Lord Mayor’s door at St Helen’s, one at the west entrance to St Paul’s, and one at the entrance to Bow Church. I don’t remember if there was one at the city gates, but there was one at the Bridge-foot, right by St Magnus Church.

I know some have quarrelled since that at the experiment, and said that there died the more people because of those fires; but I am persuaded those that say so offer no evidence to prove it, neither can I believe it on any account whatever.

I know some have argued about this during the experiment, claiming that more people died because of those fires; but I'm convinced that those who say this don't provide any evidence to support it, and I can't believe it for any reason.

It remains to give some account of the state of trade at home in England during this dreadful time, and particularly as it relates to the manufactures and the trade in the city. At the first breaking out of the infection there was, as it is easy to suppose, a very great fright among the people, and consequently a general stop of trade, except in provisions and necessaries of life; and even in those things, as there was a vast number of people fled and a very great number always sick, besides the number which died, so there could not be above two-thirds, if above one-half, of the consumption of provisions in the city as used to be.

It’s important to describe the state of trade in England during this terrible time, especially regarding manufacturing and commerce in the city. When the infection first broke out, there was understandably a lot of fear among the people, leading to a general halt in trade, except for food and essential items. Even in those areas, because many people had fled and a significant number were sick, not to mention those who had died, the consumption of provisions in the city was at most two-thirds, if not just over half, of what it usually was.

It pleased God to send a very plentiful year of corn and fruit, but not of hay or grass—by which means bread was cheap, by reason of the plenty of corn. Flesh was cheap, by reason of the scarcity of grass; but butter and cheese were dear for the same reason, and hay in the market just beyond Whitechappel Bars was sold at 4 pound per load. But that affected not the poor. There was a most excessive plenty of all sorts of fruit, such as apples, pears, plums, cherries, grapes, and they were the cheaper because of the want of people; but this made the poor eat them to excess, and this brought them into fluxes, griping of the guts, surfeits, and the like, which often precipitated them into the plague.

God decided to send a really abundant year for crops and fruit, but not for hay or grass—this meant that bread was cheap due to the surplus of grain. Meat was also inexpensive because there wasn’t much grass; however, butter and cheese were expensive for the same reason, and hay in the market just beyond Whitechapel Bars was sold at £4 per load. But that didn’t affect the poor. There was an overwhelming amount of all kinds of fruit, like apples, pears, plums, cherries, and grapes, and they were cheaper due to the lack of people buying them; but this led the poor to overeat, causing them to suffer from diarrhea, stomach cramps, excess, and similar issues, which often resulted in them contracting the plague.

But to come to matters of trade. First, foreign exportation being stopped or at least very much interrupted and rendered difficult, a general stop of all those manufactures followed of course which were usually brought for exportation; and though sometimes merchants abroad were importunate for goods, yet little was sent, the passages being so generally stopped that the English ships would not be admitted, as is said already, into their port.

But let's talk about trade. First, with foreign exports being halted or at least severely disrupted and made difficult, there was naturally a widespread halt in all those goods that were typically sent out for export. Even though some merchants overseas were eager for products, very little was shipped, as the routes were mostly blocked and English ships were reportedly not allowed into their ports.

This put a stop to the manufactures that were for exportation in most parts of England, except in some out-ports; and even that was soon stopped, for they all had the plague in their turn. But though this was felt all over England, yet, what was still worse, all intercourse of trade for home consumption of manufactures, especially those which usually circulated through the Londoner’s hands, was stopped at once, the trade of the city being stopped.

This halted the production intended for export in most parts of England, except in a few coastal towns; and even that soon came to an end, as they all experienced the plague eventually. While this affected the entire country, the situation was even worse because all trade for domestic consumption of goods, particularly those typically handled by Londoners, was completely shut down as the city's trade came to a standstill.

All kinds of handicrafts in the city, &c., tradesmen and mechanics, were, as I have said before, out of employ; and this occasioned the putting-off and dismissing an innumerable number of journeymen and workmen of all sorts, seeing nothing was done relating to such trades but what might be said to be absolutely necessary.

All kinds of craftspeople in the city, including tradesmen and mechanics, were, as I mentioned before, out of work; and this led to the postponing and firing of countless journeymen and workers of various kinds, since nothing was being done in those trades except what was absolutely essential.

This caused the multitude of single people in London to be unprovided for, as also families whose living depended upon the labour of the heads of those families; I say, this reduced them to extreme misery; and I must confess it is for the honour of the city of London, and will be for many ages, as long as this is to be spoken of, that they were able to supply with charitable provision the wants of so many thousands of those as afterwards fell sick and were distressed: so that it may be safely averred that nobody perished for want, at least that the magistrates had any notice given them of.

This left a lot of single people in London without support, as well as families who relied on the income of their breadwinners. I have to say, this brought them to a state of extreme hardship. However, I must acknowledge that it’s a point of pride for the city of London, and will remain so for many years to come, that they were able to provide charitable assistance to the many thousands who later became ill and were in need. Therefore, it can be confidently stated that no one died from lack of resources, at least not without the magistrates being informed.

This stagnation of our manufacturing trade in the country would have put the people there to much greater difficulties, but that the master-workmen, clothiers and others, to the uttermost of their stocks and strength, kept on making their goods to keep the poor at work, believing that soon as the sickness should abate they would have a quick demand in proportion to the decay of their trade at that time. But as none but those masters that were rich could do thus, and that many were poor and not able, the manufacturing trade in England suffered greatly, and the poor were pinched all over England by the calamity of the city of London only.

This slowdown in our manufacturing industry in the country would have caused even more difficulties for the people there, if it weren't for the skilled workers, cloth makers, and others who, to the limit of their resources and energy, continued to produce their goods to keep the poor employed. They believed that once the illness started to ease up, there would be a quick demand in line with how much their trade had declined at that time. However, since only the wealthier masters could manage this, and many were poor and unable to do the same, the manufacturing sector in England suffered significantly, and the poor across England were hit hard by the crisis originating from the city of London alone.

It is true that the next year made them full amends by another terrible calamity upon the city; so that the city by one calamity impoverished and weakened the country, and by another calamity, even terrible too of its kind, enriched the country and made them again amends; for an infinite quantity of household Stuff, wearing apparel, and other things, besides whole warehouses filled with merchandise and manufactures such as come from all parts of England, were consumed in the fire of London the next year after this terrible visitation. It is incredible what a trade this made all over the whole kingdom, to make good the want and to supply that loss; so that, in short, all the manufacturing hands in the nation were set on work, and were little enough for several years to supply the market and answer the demands. All foreign markets also were empty of our goods by the stop which had been occasioned by the plague, and before an open trade was allowed again; and the prodigious demand at home falling in, joined to make a quick vent for all sort of goods; so that there never was known such a trade all over England for the time as was in the first seven years after the plague, and after the fire of London.

The following year brought them a huge disaster that made up for the last one; the city was devastated and weakened by one tragedy, and then hit again by another terrible event that surprisingly enriched the country and made amends. An enormous amount of household items, clothing, and various goods, including entire warehouses full of merchandise and products from all over England, were destroyed in the Great Fire of London the year after this disastrous plague. It’s astonishing how much demand this created across the entire nation to replenish the losses. Consequently, every manufacturing worker in the country was busy for several years trying to meet market needs. Additionally, foreign markets were depleted of our goods because of the disruptions caused by the plague, and before trade could resume, the huge domestic demand emerged, leading to a rapid sale of all kinds of products. This resulted in the busiest trade in England during the first seven years following the plague and the Great Fire of London.

It remains now that I should say something of the merciful part of this terrible judgement. The last week in September, the plague being come to its crisis, its fury began to assuage. I remember my friend Dr Heath, coming to see me the week before, told me he was sure that the violence of it would assuage in a few days; but when I saw the weekly bill of that week, which was the highest of the whole year, being 8297 of all diseases, I upbraided him with it, and asked him what he had made his judgement from. His answer, however, was not so much to seek as I thought it would have been. ‘Look you,’ says he, ‘by the number which are at this time sick and infected, there should have been twenty thousand dead the last week instead of eight thousand, if the inveterate mortal contagion had been as it was two weeks ago; for then it ordinarily killed in two or three days, now not under eight or ten; and then not above one in five recovered, whereas I have observed that now not above two in five miscarry. And, observe it from me, the next bill will decrease, and you will see many more people recover than used to do; for though a vast multitude are now everywhere infected, and as many every day fall sick, yet there will not so many die as there did, for the malignity of the distemper is abated’;—adding that he began now to hope, nay, more than hope, that the infection had passed its crisis and was going off; and accordingly so it was, for the next week being, as I said, the last in September, the bill decreased almost two thousand.

Now I need to mention the silver lining of this awful judgement. The last week of September, as the plague reached its peak, its intensity started to lessen. I remember my friend Dr. Heath visited me the week before and confidently said that the worst would pass in a few days. But when I saw the weekly report that week, which recorded the highest number of deaths that year at 8,297 from all illnesses, I challenged him and asked where he based his prediction. His response turned out to be clearer than I expected. "Look," he said, "given the number of people currently sick and infected, there should have been twenty thousand deaths last week instead of eight thousand if the deadly contagion had been as it was two weeks ago; back then, it typically killed within two or three days, but now it takes at least eight or ten. And back then, only one in five recovered, whereas now it seems that about two in five manage to make it. Mark my words, the next report will show a decrease, and you'll notice many more people recovering than before; despite the fact that a huge number are currently infected and many are falling ill every day, the death toll won't be as high as it was because the severity of the disease has lessened." He added that he was starting to feel hopeful, more than hopeful, that the infection had passed its peak and was declining; and indeed, that was the case, as the following week, the last week of September, the reported deaths dropped by almost two thousand.

It is true the plague was still at a frightful height, and the next bill was no less than 6460, and the next to that, 5720; but still my friend’s observation was just, and it did appear the people did recover faster and more in number than they used to do; and indeed, if it had not been so, what had been the condition of the city of London? For, according to my friend, there were not fewer than 60,000 people at that time infected, whereof, as above, 20,477 died, and near 40,000 recovered; whereas, had it been as it was before, 50,000 of that number would very probably have died, if not more, and 50,000 more would have sickened; for, in a word, the whole mass of people began to sicken, and it looked as if none would escape.

It’s true that the plague was still at an alarming level, with the next report showing 6,460 cases, and the one after that 5,720. However, my friend's observation was accurate, as it seemed that people were recovering faster and in greater numbers than before. In fact, if that hadn’t been the case, what would have happened to the city of London? According to my friend, there were at least 60,000 people infected at that time, of which, as mentioned, 20,477 died and nearly 40,000 recovered. If things had been like they used to be, 50,000 of that number would likely have died, if not more, and another 50,000 would have fallen ill; because, in short, the entire population began to get sick, and it seemed like no one would escape.

But this remark of my friend’s appeared more evident in a few weeks more, for the decrease went on, and another week in October it decreased 1843, so that the number dead of the plague was but 2665; and the next week it decreased 1413 more, and yet it was seen plainly that there was abundance of people sick, nay, abundance more than ordinary, and abundance fell sick every day but (as above) the malignity of the disease abated.

But my friend's comment became even clearer after a few more weeks. The numbers kept dropping, and in another week of October, it went down to 1,843, so the total deaths from the plague was only 2,665. The following week saw another decrease of 1,413, yet it was obvious that there were still a lot of people sick—more than usual—and many were getting sick every day. However, as mentioned earlier, the severity of the disease lessened.

Such is the precipitant disposition of our people (whether it is so or not all over the world, that’s none of my particular business to inquire), but I saw it apparently here, that as upon the first fright of the infection they shunned one another, and fled from one another’s houses and from the city with an unaccountable and, as I thought, unnecessary fright, so now, upon this notion spreading, viz., that the distemper was not so catching as formerly, and that if it was catched it was not so mortal, and seeing abundance of people who really fell sick recover again daily, they took to such a precipitant courage, and grew so entirely regardless of themselves and of the infection, that they made no more of the plague than of an ordinary fever, nor indeed so much. They not only went boldly into company with those who had tumours and carbuncles upon them that were running, and consequently contagious, but ate and drank with them, nay, into their houses to visit them, and even, as I was told, into their very chambers where they lay sick.

Such is the hasty nature of our people (whether it's like that everywhere else in the world is not my concern to investigate), but I saw it clearly here. At first, when the infection broke out, they avoided each other and fled from one another’s homes and the city in a puzzling and, as I thought, unnecessary panic. Now, with the idea spreading that the illness wasn’t as contagious as before, and if someone did catch it, it wasn’t as deadly, along with seeing many people getting sick and recovering daily, they became so recklessly brave and completely indifferent to themselves and the infection that they treated the plague like it was just a regular fever, or even less than that. They not only boldly mingled with those who had visible symptoms like sores and boils, which were contagious, but they also ate and drank with them, visited their homes, and even, as I heard, went into their very rooms where they lay sick.

This I could not see rational. My friend Dr Heath allowed, and it was plain to experience, that the distemper was as catching as ever, and as many fell sick, but only he alleged that so many of those that fell sick did not die; but I think that while many did die, and that at best the distemper itself was very terrible, the sores and swellings very tormenting, and the danger of death not left out of the circumstances of sickness, though not so frequent as before; all those things, together with the exceeding tediousness of the cure, the loathsomeness of the disease, and many other articles, were enough to deter any man living from a dangerous mixture with the sick people, and make them as anxious almost to avoid the infections as before.

I couldn't see this as rational. My friend Dr. Heath agreed, and it was evident from experience that the illness was as contagious as ever, and many people got sick. However, he claimed that many of those who got sick didn’t die; but I think that while many did die, and the illness itself was very severe, the sores and swelling were extremely painful, and the risk of death was still a part of the sickness, even if it wasn’t as common as before. All of these factors, along with the lengthy and unpleasant nature of the treatment, the repulsiveness of the disease, and many other issues, were enough to deter anyone from mingling with sick people and made them almost as eager to avoid infections as before.

Nay, there was another thing which made the mere catching of the distemper frightful, and that was the terrible burning of the caustics which the surgeons laid on the swellings to bring them to break and to run, without which the danger of death was very great, even to the last. Also, the insufferable torment of the swellings, which, though it might not make people raving and distracted, as they were before, and as I have given several instances of already, yet they put the patient to inexpressible torment; and those that fell into it, though they did escape with life, yet they made bitter complaints of those that had told them there was no danger, and sadly repented their rashness and folly in venturing to run into the reach of it.

No, there was another reason why just catching the disease was terrifying, and that was the awful burning sensation from the caustics the surgeons applied to the swollen areas to make them burst and drain. Without this treatment, the risk of death was very high, even until the end. Also, the unbearable pain from the swellings, which, although it might not drive people to madness and distraction as they experienced before—of which I have already given several examples—still caused the patient immense suffering. Those who went through it, even if they survived, bitterly complained about those who had assured them there was no danger and deeply regretted their rashness and foolishness in exposing themselves to it.

Nor did this unwary conduct of the people end here, for a great many that thus cast off their cautions suffered more deeply still, and though many escaped, yet many died; and at least it had this public mischief attending it, that it made the decrease of burials slower than it would otherwise have been. For as this notion ran like lightning through the city, and people’s heads were possessed with it, even as soon as the first great decrease in the bills appeared, we found that the two next bills did not decrease in proportion; the reason I take to be the people’s running so rashly into danger, giving up all their former cautions and care, and all the shyness which they used to practise, depending that the sickness would not reach them—or that if it did, they should not die.

The careless behavior of the people didn’t stop there; many who dropped their guard ended up suffering even more. Although some managed to escape, many died, and at the very least, it caused the number of burials to decline more slowly than it could have. As this idea spread rapidly through the city, and people's minds became consumed with it, we noticed that once the first significant drop in the death toll was reported, the following two reports didn’t show a similar decline. I believe this happened because people recklessly ran into danger, abandoning their previous caution and the carefulness they used to have, thinking the sickness wouldn’t affect them—or if it did, they wouldn’t die.

The physicians opposed this thoughtless humour of the people with all their might, and gave out printed directions, spreading them all over the city and suburbs, advising the people to continue reserved, and to use still the utmost caution in their ordinary conduct, notwithstanding the decrease of the distemper, terrifying them with the danger of bringing a relapse upon the whole city, and telling them how such a relapse might be more fatal and dangerous than the whole visitation that had been already; with many arguments and reasons to explain and prove that part to them, and which are too long to repeat here.

The doctors strongly opposed the careless attitude of the people and distributed printed instructions throughout the city and surrounding areas. They advised everyone to remain cautious and careful in their daily lives, despite the decline of the disease. They warned that relaxing their vigilance could lead to a resurgence that could be even more deadly than the previous outbreak, providing numerous arguments and reasons to support their claims, which are too lengthy to recount here.

But it was all to no purpose; the audacious creatures were so possessed with the first joy and so surprised with the satisfaction of seeing a vast decrease in the weekly bills, that they were impenetrable by any new terrors, and would not be persuaded but that the bitterness of death was past; and it was to no more purpose to talk to them than to an east wind; but they opened shops, went about streets, did business, and conversed with anybody that came in their way to converse with, whether with business or without, neither inquiring of their health or so much as being apprehensive of any danger from them, though they knew them not to be sound.

But it was all in vain; the bold creatures were so filled with excitement and so thrilled by the drop in their weekly bills that they were completely unaffected by any new fears. They wouldn’t believe that the worst was over; talking to them was as pointless as speaking to a gust of wind. Instead, they opened shops, walked around the streets, conducted business, and chatted with anyone who crossed their path, whether it was for work or not, without asking about their wellbeing or worrying about any dangers, even though they knew those they encountered weren’t completely trustworthy.

This imprudent, rash conduct cost a great many their lives who had with great care and caution shut themselves up and kept retired, as it were, from all mankind, and had by that means, under God’s providence, been preserved through all the heat of that infection.

This reckless and hasty behavior cost many lives, including those who had carefully isolated themselves and kept away from everyone else, and by doing so, had been preserved, thanks to God's protection, through the height of that infection.

This rash and foolish conduct, I say, of the people went so far that the ministers took notice to them of it at last, and laid before them both the folly and danger of it; and this checked it a little, so that they grew more cautious. But it had another effect, which they could not check; for as the first rumour had spread not over the city only, but into the country, it had the like effect: and the people were so tired with being so long from London, and so eager to come back, that they flocked to town without fear or forecast, and began to show themselves in the streets as if all the danger was over. It was indeed surprising to see it, for though there died still from 1000 to 1800 a week, yet the people flocked to town as if all had been well.

This reckless and silly behavior of the people got so extreme that the ministers finally brought it to their attention, highlighting both the foolishness and the dangers of it. This caused some pause, making them a bit more careful. However, it had another effect that they couldn’t control; since the initial rumor had spread not just through the city but also into the surrounding areas, it had a similar impact: the people were so tired of being away from London and so eager to return that they crowded back into the city without a second thought, acting as if all the danger had passed. It was indeed surprising to see, because even though between 1,000 and 1,800 people were still dying each week, folks rushed back to town as if everything was fine.

The consequence of this was, that the bills increased again 400 the very first week in November; and if I might believe the physicians, there was above 3000 fell sick that week, most of them new-comers, too.

The result of this was that the bills went up again by 400 during the very first week of November; and if I could trust the doctors, over 3000 people got sick that week, most of them new arrivals, as well.

One John Cock, a barber in St Martin’s-le-Grand, was an eminent example of this; I mean of the hasty return of the people when the plague was abated. This John Cock had left the town with his whole family, and locked up his house, and was gone in the country, as many others did; and finding the plague so decreased in November that there died but 905 per week of all diseases, he ventured home again. He had in his family ten persons; that is to say, himself and wife, five children, two apprentices, and a maid-servant. He had not returned to his house above a week, and began to open his shop and carry on his trade, but the distemper broke out in his family, and within about five days they all died, except one; that is to say, himself, his wife, all his five children, and his two apprentices; and only the maid remained alive.

One John Cock, a barber in St Martin’s-le-Grand, was a clear example of this; I mean the quick return of people once the plague had lessened. This John Cock had left the town with his whole family, locked up his house, and went to the country, like many others did. When he saw that the plague had dropped significantly in November, with only 905 deaths per week from all diseases, he decided to come back. He had ten people in his family; that is, himself, his wife, five children, two apprentices, and a maid. He had been back in his house for just over a week, started to open his shop, and resumed his business, but the illness broke out in his family, and within about five days, they all died except one; that is, himself, his wife, all five of his children, and his two apprentices; only the maid survived.

But the mercy of God was greater to the rest than we had reason to expect; for the malignity (as I have said) of the distemper was spent, the contagion was exhausted, and also the winter weather came on apace, and the air was clear and cold, with sharp frosts; and this increasing still, most of those that had fallen sick recovered, and the health of the city began to return. There were indeed some returns of the distemper even in the month of December, and the bills increased near a hundred; but it went off again, and so in a short while things began to return to their own channel. And wonderful it was to see how populous the city was again all on a sudden, so that a stranger could not miss the numbers that were lost. Neither was there any miss of the inhabitants as to their dwellings—few or no empty houses were to be seen, or if there were some, there was no want of tenants for them.

But God's mercy was greater to the rest than we had expected; for the evil nature of the illness had faded, the contagion was gone, and winter weather was quickly approaching, bringing clear and cold air with sharp frosts. As this continued, most of those who had fallen ill recovered, and the city's health began to improve. There were indeed some returns of the illness even in December, and the death toll rose by nearly a hundred, but it subsided again, and soon things started to return to normal. It was amazing to see how crowded the city suddenly became, so much so that a stranger couldn’t help but notice the numbers that were lost. There was also no shortage of inhabitants in their homes—few or no empty houses were visible, and if there were some, there was no lack of tenants for them.

I wish I could say that as the city had a new face, so the manners of the people had a new appearance. I doubt not but there were many that retained a sincere sense of their deliverance, and were that heartily thankful to that Sovereign Hand that had protected them in so dangerous a time; it would be very uncharitable to judge otherwise in a city so populous, and where the people were so devout as they were here in the time of the visitation itself; but except what of this was to be found in particular families and faces, it must be acknowledged that the general practice of the people was just as it was before, and very little difference was to be seen.

I wish I could say that just as the city had a fresh look, the attitudes of the people also changed. I have no doubt that many still felt genuinely grateful for their rescue and were truly thankful to the higher power that protected them during such a dangerous time; it would be very unfair to think otherwise in such a crowded city, especially where the people were as devout as they were during the crisis itself. However, aside from what could be seen in a few specific families and individuals, it's clear that the overall behavior of the people remained much the same, and there was very little noticeable difference.

Some, indeed, said things were worse; that the morals of the people declined from this very time; that the people, hardened by the danger they had been in, like seamen after a storm is over, were more wicked and more stupid, more bold and hardened, in their vices and immoralities than they were before; but I will not carry it so far neither. It would take up a history of no small length to give a particular of all the gradations by which the course of things in this city came to be restored again, and to run in their own channel as they did before.

Some even claimed that things were worse; that the morals of the people started to decline from that very moment; that the people, hardened by the danger they had faced, like sailors after a storm, became more wicked and more foolish, bolder and more callous in their vices and immoral behaviors than they were before; but I won't go that far either. It would require a lengthy account to describe all the steps through which the situation in this city began to improve again, and to flow in their own course as they did before.

Some parts of England were now infected as violently as London had been; the cities of Norwich, Peterborough, Lincoln, Colchester, and other places were now visited; and the magistrates of London began to set rules for our conduct as to corresponding with those cities. It is true we could not pretend to forbid their people coming to London, because it was impossible to know them asunder; so, after many consultations, the Lord Mayor and Court of Aldermen were obliged to drop it. All they could do was to warn and caution the people not to entertain in their houses or converse with any people who they knew came from such infected places.

Some areas of England were now as severely affected as London had been; the cities of Norwich, Peterborough, Lincoln, Colchester, and others were now impacted as well. The magistrates of London started to set rules for how we should interact with those cities. It’s true we couldn’t really prevent their people from coming to London, since it was impossible to identify them separately; so, after many discussions, the Lord Mayor and the Court of Aldermen had to abandon the idea. All they could do was warn and urge the public not to host or talk to anyone they knew had come from those infected areas.

But they might as well have talked to the air, for the people of London thought themselves so plague-free now that they were past all admonitions; they seemed to depend upon it that the air was restored, and that the air was like a man that had had the smallpox, not capable of being infected again. This revived that notion that the infection was all in the air, that there was no such thing as contagion from the sick people to the sound; and so strongly did this whimsy prevail among people that they ran all together promiscuously, sick and well. Not the Mahometans, who, prepossessed with the principle of predestination, value nothing of contagion, let it be in what it will, could be more obstinate than the people of London; they that were perfectly sound, and came out of the wholesome air, as we call it, into the city, made nothing of going into the same houses and chambers, nay, even into the same beds, with those that had the distemper upon them, and were not recovered.

But they might as well have talked to the wind, because the people of London believed they were free from the plague now and ignored all warnings; they seemed to think the air was safe again, like a person who had gotten over smallpox, unable to catch it again. This revived the idea that the infection was all in the air and that there was no such thing as spreading it from sick people to healthy ones. So strongly did this belief take hold that people mixed freely, sick and healthy alike. Not even the Muslims, who, believing in predestination, ignore the risk of contagion no matter what, could be more stubborn than the people of London; those who were completely healthy and had just come from what we call the clean air into the city thought nothing of entering the same houses and rooms, even sharing the same beds, with those who were still sick and hadn't recovered.

Some, indeed, paid for their audacious boldness with the price of their lives; an infinite number fell sick, and the physicians had more work than ever, only with this difference, that more of their patients recovered; that is to say, they generally recovered, but certainly there were more people infected and fell sick now, when there did not die above a thousand or twelve hundred in a week, than there was when there died five or six thousand a week, so entirely negligent were the people at that time in the great and dangerous case of health and infection, and so ill were they able to take or accept of the advice of those who cautioned them for their good.

Some people actually paid for their reckless boldness with their lives; countless others got sick, and doctors had more work than ever, but with one difference: more of their patients recovered; that is to say, they usually got better, but definitely there were more people infected and falling ill now, even though only about a thousand or twelve hundred died in a week, than there were when five or six thousand died each week. This showed how careless people were at that time regarding health and infection, and how poorly they listened to the advice of those who warned them for their own good.

The people being thus returned, as it were, in general, it was very strange to find that in their inquiring after their friends, some whole families were so entirely swept away that there was no remembrance of them left, neither was anybody to be found to possess or show any title to that little they had left; for in such cases what was to be found was generally embezzled and purloined, some gone one way, some another.

The people being returned, in a way, it was very strange to see that when they asked about their friends, some entire families had been so completely lost that there was no memory of them left. There was no one to be found who owned or could show any claim to the little they had left; because in such cases, what could be found was usually stolen or gone missing, with some going one way and others another.

It was said such abandoned effects came to the king, as the universal heir; upon which we are told, and I suppose it was in part true, that the king granted all such, as deodands, to the Lord Mayor and Court of Aldermen of London, to be applied to the use of the poor, of whom there were very many. For it is to be observed, that though the occasions of relief and the objects of distress were very many more in the time of the violence of the plague than now after all was over, yet the distress of the poor was more now a great deal than it was then, because all the sluices of general charity were now shut. People supposed the main occasion to be over, and so stopped their hands; whereas particular objects were still very moving, and the distress of those that were poor was very great indeed.

It was said that such abandoned belongings went to the king, as the universal heir; as a result, we are told—though I believe it was partly true—that the king awarded all such items, known as deodands, to the Lord Mayor and Court of Aldermen of London, to be used for the benefit of the poor, of whom there were many. It should be noted that even though there were far more reasons for aid and many more people in need during the height of the plague than now that it was all over, the hardship faced by the poor was much greater now because all the avenues for general charity had been closed off. People believed the main crisis had passed and therefore stopped giving; however, specific cases were still very compelling, and the suffering of those who were poor was extremely significant.

Though the health of the city was now very much restored, yet foreign trade did not begin to stir, neither would foreigners admit our ships into their ports for a great while. As for the Dutch, the misunderstandings between our court and them had broken out into a war the year before, so that our trade that way was wholly interrupted; but Spain and Portugal, Italy and Barbary, as also Hamburg and all the ports in the Baltic, these were all shy of us a great while, and would not restore trade with us for many months.

Though the city's health had greatly improved, foreign trade still hadn't picked up, and it took a long time for foreign ports to allow our ships entry. As for the Dutch, the conflicts between our government and them had escalated into a war the year before, which completely halted our trade in that direction. Meanwhile, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Barbary, Hamburg, and all the Baltic ports remained hesitant to engage with us for many months.

The distemper sweeping away such multitudes, as I have observed, many if not all the out-parishes were obliged to make new burying-grounds, besides that I have mentioned in Bunhill Fields, some of which were continued, and remain in use to this day. But others were left off, and (which I confess I mention with some reflection) being converted into other uses or built upon afterwards, the dead bodies were disturbed, abused, dug up again, some even before the flesh of them was perished from the bones, and removed like dung or rubbish to other places. Some of those which came within the reach of my observation are as follow:

The illness sweeping through so many people, as I’ve noted, forced many, if not all, the outlying parishes to create new graveyards, in addition to the one I mentioned in Bunhill Fields, some of which are still in use today. However, others were abandoned, and (I admit I mention this with some regret) were repurposed or built over later, disturbing the remains, which were unceremoniously exhumed, some even while the flesh was still clinging to the bones, and treated like trash or debris in other locations. Here are some of the cases I observed:

(1) A piece of ground beyond Goswell Street, near Mount Mill, being some of the remains of the old lines or fortifications of the city, where abundance were buried promiscuously from the parishes of Aldersgate, Clerkenwell, and even out of the city. This ground, as I take it, was since made a physic garden, and after that has been built upon.

(1) A patch of land beyond Goswell Street, close to Mount Mill, which is part of the old walls or fortifications of the city, where many people were buried haphazardly from the parishes of Aldersgate, Clerkenwell, and even outside the city. This land, as I understand it, was later turned into a herbal garden, and has since been developed into a building site.

(2) A piece of ground just over the Black Ditch, as it was then called, at the end of Holloway Lane, in Shoreditch parish. It has been since made a yard for keeping hogs, and for other ordinary uses, but is quite out of use as a burying-ground.

(2) A piece of land just past the Black Ditch, as it was known back then, at the end of Holloway Lane, in Shoreditch parish. It has since been turned into a yard for keeping pigs and other regular purposes, but it's no longer used as a burial ground.

(3) The upper end of Hand Alley, in Bishopsgate Street, which was then a green field, and was taken in particularly for Bishopsgate parish, though many of the carts out of the city brought their dead thither also, particularly out of the parish of St All-hallows on the Wall. This place I cannot mention without much regret. It was, as I remember, about two or three years after the plague was ceased that Sir Robert Clayton came to be possessed of the ground. It was reported, how true I know not, that it fell to the king for want of heirs, all those who had any right to it being carried off by the pestilence, and that Sir Robert Clayton obtained a grant of it from King Charles II. But however he came by it, certain it is the ground was let out to build on, or built upon, by his order. The first house built upon it was a large fair house, still standing, which faces the street or way now called Hand Alley which, though called an alley, is as wide as a street. The houses in the same row with that house northward are built on the very same ground where the poor people were buried, and the bodies, on opening the ground for the foundations, were dug up, some of them remaining so plain to be seen that the women’s skulls were distinguished by their long hair, and of others the flesh was not quite perished; so that the people began to exclaim loudly against it, and some suggested that it might endanger a return of the contagion; after which the bones and bodies, as fast as they came at them, were carried to another part of the same ground and thrown all together into a deep pit, dug on purpose, which now is to be known in that it is not built on, but is a passage to another house at the upper end of Rose Alley, just against the door of a meeting-house which has been built there many years since; and the ground is palisadoed off from the rest of the passage, in a little square; there lie the bones and remains of near two thousand bodies, carried by the dead carts to their grave in that one year.

(3) The upper end of Hand Alley on Bishopsgate Street used to be a green field, specifically designated for Bishopsgate parish, but many carts from the city also brought their dead here, especially from the parish of St All-hallows on the Wall. I can't mention this place without feeling a lot of sadness. As I recall, it was about two or three years after the plague had ended that Sir Robert Clayton acquired the land. It was rumored—though I can't confirm how true it is—that it reverted to the king due to a lack of heirs, as all those entitled to it had been taken by the plague, and that Sir Robert Clayton received a grant from King Charles II. However he came by it, it's certain that the grounds were leased for construction or developed by his order. The first house built there was a large, handsome structure that still stands today, facing the street now called Hand Alley, which, despite being called an alley, is as wide as a street. The houses in the same row to the north were built on the very land where poor people were buried, and when excavating for the foundations, many bodies were unearthed, some still visible enough to distinguish women's skulls by their long hair, while others had not completely decomposed. This led to public outcry, with some fearing it might trigger a return of the contagion; consequently, the bones and remains were swiftly collected and moved to another part of the same land, dumped into a deep pit that was dug specifically for this purpose. This area is now known because it hasn't been built on, but serves as a passage to another house at the upper end of Rose Alley, directly across from a meeting house that has stood there for many years. The ground is fenced off from the rest of the passage in a small square, where the bones and remains of nearly two thousand bodies, carried by the dead carts to their grave in that single year, now lie.

(4) Besides this, there was a piece of ground in Moorfields; by the going into the street which is now called Old Bethlem, which was enlarged much, though not wholly taken in on the same occasion.

(4) In addition to that, there was a piece of land in Moorfields; at the entrance to the street now known as Old Bethlem, which was expanded quite a bit, although not completely included at that time.

[N.B.—The author of this journal lies buried in that very ground, being at his own desire, his sister having been buried there a few years before.]

[N.B.—The author of this journal is buried in that very ground, having chosen to do so himself, since his sister was buried there a few years earlier.]

(5) Stepney parish, extending itself from the east part of London to the north, even to the very edge of Shoreditch Churchyard, had a piece of ground taken in to bury their dead close to the said churchyard, and which for that very reason was left open, and is since, I suppose, taken into the same churchyard. And they had also two other burying-places in Spittlefields, one where since a chapel or tabernacle has been built for ease to this great parish, and another in Petticoat Lane.

(5) Stepney parish, stretching from the eastern part of London to the north, right up to the edge of Shoreditch Churchyard, had an area designated for burying their dead close to the churchyard, which was left open for that purpose and has likely since been incorporated into the churchyard. They also had two other burial sites in Spitalfields, one where a chapel or tabernacle has since been built for the convenience of this large parish, and another in Petticoat Lane.

There were no less than five other grounds made use of for the parish of Stepney at that time: one where now stands the parish church of St Paul, Shadwell, and the other where now stands the parish church of St John’s at Wapping, both which had not the names of parishes at that time, but were belonging to Stepney parish.

There were at least five other areas used for the parish of Stepney back then: one where the parish church of St Paul now stands in Shadwell, and the other where the parish church of St John’s now stands at Wapping. Neither of these had parish names at that time; they were both part of the Stepney parish.

I could name many more, but these coming within my particular knowledge, the circumstance, I thought, made it of use to record them. From the whole, it may be observed that they were obliged in this time of distress to take in new burying-grounds in most of the out-parishes for laying the prodigious numbers of people which died in so short a space of time; but why care was not taken to keep those places separate from ordinary uses, that so the bodies might rest undisturbed, that I cannot answer for, and must confess I think it was wrong. Who were to blame I know not.

I could mention many more, but these examples are relevant to my experience, so I thought it was worth noting them. Overall, it’s clear that during this time of crisis, they had to set up new burial grounds in most of the surrounding parishes to accommodate the huge number of people who died in such a short time. However, I can’t explain why there wasn’t an effort to keep those areas separate from regular uses, so that the bodies could rest peacefully, and I must admit I think that was a mistake. I'm not sure who is at fault.

I should have mentioned that the Quakers had at that time also a burying-ground set apart to their use, and which they still make use of; and they had also a particular dead-cart to fetch their dead from their houses; and the famous Solomon Eagle, who, as I mentioned before, had predicted the plague as a judgement, and ran naked through the streets, telling the people that it was come upon them to punish them for their sins, had his own wife died the very next day of the plague, and was carried, one of the first in the Quakers’ dead-cart, to their new burying-ground.

I should have mentioned that the Quakers had a burial ground set aside for their use at that time, which they still use today; they also had a special cart for picking up their deceased from their homes. The well-known Solomon Eagle, who I mentioned earlier, had predicted the plague as a punishment and ran through the streets naked, telling people it had come to punish them for their sins. Ironically, his own wife died from the plague the very next day and was one of the first to be taken in the Quakers' dead cart to their new burial ground.

I might have thronged this account with many more remarkable things which occurred in the time of the infection, and particularly what passed between the Lord Mayor and the Court, which was then at Oxford, and what directions were from time to time received from the Government for their conduct on this critical occasion. But really the Court concerned themselves so little, and that little they did was of so small import, that I do not see it of much moment to mention any part of it here: except that of appointing a monthly fast in the city and the sending the royal charity to the relief of the poor, both which I have mentioned before.

I could have filled this account with many more significant events that happened during the outbreak, especially regarding what took place between the Lord Mayor and the Court, which was then in Oxford, along with the directives received from the Government about their actions during this critical time. However, the Court showed very little concern, and the little that they did was of such minor importance that I don’t think it’s worth mentioning any of it here, except for the monthly fast they designated in the city and the royal charity sent to help the poor, both of which I have mentioned before.

Great was the reproach thrown on those physicians who left their patients during the sickness, and now they came to town again nobody cared to employ them. They were called deserters, and frequently bills were set up upon their doors and written, ‘Here is a doctor to be let’, so that several of those physicians were fain for a while to sit still and look about them, or at least remove their dwellings, and set up in new places and among new acquaintance. The like was the case with the clergy, whom the people were indeed very abusive to, writing verses and scandalous reflections upon them, setting upon the church-door, ‘Here is a pulpit to be let’, or sometimes, ‘to be sold’, which was worse.

There was a lot of criticism aimed at the doctors who abandoned their patients during the illness, and when they returned to town, nobody wanted to hire them. They were labeled as deserters, and it wasn't uncommon to see signs posted on their doors saying, ‘This doctor is available for hire,’ so many of these physicians had to sit around for a while, look for options, or at least move to different neighborhoods and find new clients. The same happened to the clergy, who faced harsh treatment from the public, with people writing poems and spreading rumors about them, putting up signs on the church door that read, ‘This pulpit is available for hire,’ or sometimes, ‘for sale,’ which was even worse.

It was not the least of our misfortunes that with our infection, when it ceased, there did not cease the spirit of strife and contention, slander and reproach, which was really the great troubler of the nation’s peace before. It was said to be the remains of the old animosities, which had so lately involved us all in blood and disorder. But as the late Act of Indemnity had laid asleep the quarrel itself, so the Government had recommended family and personal peace upon all occasions to the whole nation.

It was one of our biggest misfortunes that even after our infection ended, the spirit of conflict, slander, and blame did not go away, which had been the real source of turmoil in the nation before. It was thought to be leftover animosities that had recently plunged us all into violence and chaos. However, just as the recent Act of Indemnity had put the quarrel to rest, the Government had urged everyone in the nation to promote peace within families and personal relationships at all times.

But it could not be obtained; and particularly after the ceasing of the plague in London, when any one that had seen the condition which the people had been in, and how they caressed one another at that time, promised to have more charity for the future, and to raise no more reproaches; I say, any one that had seen them then would have thought they would have come together with another spirit at last. But, I say, it could not be obtained. The quarrel remained; the Church and the Presbyterians were incompatible. As soon as the plague was removed, the Dissenting ousted ministers who had supplied the pulpits which were deserted by the incumbents retired; they could expect no other but that they should immediately fall upon them and harass them with their penal laws, accept their preaching while they were sick, and persecute them as soon as they were recovered again; this even we that were of the Church thought was very hard, and could by no means approve of it.

But it couldn’t be achieved; especially after the plague in London ended, when anyone who had witnessed the state of the people and how they cared for each other at that time would have promised to be more compassionate in the future and to stop casting blame. I mean, anyone who had seen them then would have thought that they would finally come together with a different attitude. But, I say, it couldn’t be achieved. The conflict persisted; the Church and the Presbyterians were at odds. As soon as the plague was over, the dissenting ministers who had preached in the empty pulpits returned; they could only expect that they would soon be targeted and harassed by their penal laws, allowed to preach while they were sick, and then persecuted as soon as they recovered; even we, who were part of the Church, thought this was very unfair and could not approve of it.

But it was the Government, and we could say nothing to hinder it; we could only say it was not our doing, and we could not answer for it.

But it was the Government, and we couldn't say anything to stop it; we could only say it wasn't our decision, and we couldn't take responsibility for it.

On the other hand, the Dissenters reproaching those ministers of the Church with going away and deserting their charge, abandoning the people in their danger, and when they had most need of comfort, and the like: this we could by no means approve, for all men have not the same faith and the same courage, and the Scripture commands us to judge the most favourably and according to charity.

On the other hand, the Dissenters criticized those ministers of the Church for leaving and abandoning their responsibilities, deserting the people when they were in danger and needed support the most. We cannot agree with this because not everyone has the same faith or bravery, and the Scripture instructs us to judge others in the most charitable and understanding way.

A plague is a formidable enemy, and is armed with terrors that every man is not sufficiently fortified to resist or prepared to stand the shock against. It is very certain that a great many of the clergy who were in circumstances to do it withdrew and fled for the safety of their lives; but ’tis true also that a great many of them stayed, and many of them fell in the calamity and in the discharge of their duty.

A plague is a powerful foe, equipped with fears that not everyone is strong enough to fight off or ready to face. It's clear that many clergy members who could have helped chose to leave and escape for their own safety; however, it's also true that many stayed behind, and several of them died while fulfilling their responsibilities.

It is true some of the Dissenting turned-out ministers stayed, and their courage is to be commended and highly valued—but these were not abundance; it cannot be said that they all stayed, and that none retired into the country, any more than it can be said of the Church clergy that they all went away. Neither did all those that went away go without substituting curates and others in their places, to do the offices needful and to visit the sick, as far as it was practicable; so that, upon the whole, an allowance of charity might have been made on both sides, and we should have considered that such a time as this of 1665 is not to be paralleled in history, and that it is not the stoutest courage that will always support men in such cases. I had not said this, but had rather chosen to record the courage and religious zeal of those of both sides, who did hazard themselves for the service of the poor people in their distress, without remembering that any failed in their duty on either side. But the want of temper among us has made the contrary to this necessary: some that stayed not only boasting too much of themselves, but reviling those that fled, branding them with cowardice, deserting their flocks, and acting the part of the hireling, and the like. I recommend it to the charity of all good people to look back and reflect duly upon the terrors of the time, and whoever does so will see that it is not an ordinary strength that could support it. It was not like appearing in the head of an army or charging a body of horse in the field, but it was charging Death itself on his pale horse; to stay was indeed to die, and it could be esteemed nothing less, especially as things appeared at the latter end of August and the beginning of September, and as there was reason to expect them at that time; for no man expected, and I dare say believed, that the distemper would take so sudden a turn as it did, and fall immediately two thousand in a week, when there was such a prodigious number of people sick at that time as it was known there was; and then it was that many shifted away that had stayed most of the time before.

Some of the dissenting ministers did stick around, and their bravery should be praised and appreciated—but they were not many; it can’t be said that all of them stayed, nor that none retreated to the countryside, just like it can't be said that all the church clergy left. Besides, not everyone who left did so without finding substitutes—curates and others—to perform necessary duties and visit the sick as much as possible. Overall, we might have granted some understanding on both sides, recognizing that a time like 1665 is unprecedented in history. It’s not always the strongest courage that helps people in those situations. I wouldn’t have said this otherwise; I would have preferred to highlight the bravery and religious devotion of those from both sides who risked themselves to help the needy during their suffering, without suggesting that anyone neglected their responsibilities on either side. However, our lack of patience has made this point necessary: some who stayed not only boast about it but also insult those who left, accusing them of cowardice and abandoning their flocks, acting like hirelings, and so on. I urge all kind-hearted people to reflect on the fears of that time, and anyone who does will understand that it took extraordinary strength to endure it. It wasn't the same as leading an army or charging cavalry in battle; it was like confronting Death itself on his pale horse; staying meant almost certain death, especially given how things looked at the end of August and the beginning of September, when people were anxious about the outcome. No one expected—and I dare say believed—that the illness would take such a sudden turn and drop by two thousand in a week when so many people were already sick then; that’s when many who had stayed most of the time decided to leave.

Besides, if God gave strength to some more than to others, was it to boast of their ability to abide the stroke, and upbraid those that had not the same gift and support, or ought not they rather to have been humble and thankful if they were rendered more useful than their brethren?

Besides, if God gave some people more strength than others, was it so they could brag about their ability to handle challenges and criticize those who didn’t have the same abilities? Or shouldn’t they have been humble and grateful that they were made more useful than their peers?

I think it ought to be recorded to the honour of such men, as well clergy as physicians, surgeons, apothecaries, magistrates, and officers of every kind, as also all useful people who ventured their lives in discharge of their duty, as most certainly all such as stayed did to the last degree; and several of all these kinds did not only venture but lose their lives on that sad occasion.

I believe it's important to acknowledge the honor of those men, including clergy, doctors, surgeons, pharmacists, magistrates, and all kinds of officials, as well as anyone who risked their lives while doing their duty. Certainly, everyone who remained until the very end did so; many among these groups not only took that risk but also lost their lives during that tragic event.

I was once making a list of all such, I mean of all those professions and employments who thus died, as I call it, in the way of their duty; but it was impossible for a private man to come at a certainty in the particulars. I only remember that there died sixteen clergymen, two aldermen, five physicians, thirteen surgeons, within the city and liberties before the beginning of September. But this being, as I said before, the great crisis and extremity of the infection, it can be no complete list. As to inferior people, I think there died six-and-forty constables and head-boroughs in the two parishes of Stepney and Whitechappel; but I could not carry my list on, for when the violent rage of the distemper in September came upon us, it drove us out of all measures. Men did then no more die by tale and by number. They might put out a weekly bill, and call them seven or eight thousand, or what they pleased; ’tis certain they died by heaps, and were buried by heaps, that is to say, without account. And if I might believe some people, who were more abroad and more conversant with those things than I though I was public enough for one that had no more business to do than I had,—I say, if I may believe them, there was not many less buried those first three weeks in September than 20,000 per week. However, the others aver the truth of it; yet I rather choose to keep to the public account; seven and eight thousand per week is enough to make good all that I have said of the terror of those times;—and it is much to the satisfaction of me that write, as well as those that read, to be able to say that everything is set down with moderation, and rather within compass than beyond it.

I was once making a list of all the people who died while doing their jobs, but it was impossible for an ordinary person to get all the details right. I only remember that before September began, sixteen clergymen, two aldermen, five physicians, and thirteen surgeons died within the city and its surrounding areas. But since this was, as I mentioned earlier, the peak of the outbreak, this cannot be a complete list. As for regular folks, I think forty-six constables and local leaders died in the two parishes of Stepney and Whitechapel. However, I couldn’t continue my list because when the outbreak hit us hard in September, it was overwhelming. People no longer died in counted numbers. They might release a weekly report claiming seven or eight thousand deaths, or whatever they wanted; the truth is they died in massive numbers and were buried in massive numbers, meaning without any record. If I could trust some people who were more active and involved in those matters than I was—though I was public enough for someone who had no other work to do—I’d say that in the first three weeks of September, not many less than 20,000 were buried each week. Still, others insist on the accuracy of their accounts; I prefer to stick to the public records. Seven or eight thousand per week is enough to illustrate the fear during those times, and it satisfies me to be able to say that everything is documented reasonably, staying within bounds rather than going overboard.

Upon all these accounts, I say, I could wish, when we were recovered, our conduct had been more distinguished for charity and kindness in remembrance of the past calamity, and not so much a valuing ourselves upon our boldness in staying, as if all men were cowards that fly from the hand of God, or that those who stay do not sometimes owe their courage to their ignorance, and despising the hand of their Maker—which is a criminal kind of desperation, and not a true courage.

Given all these reasons, I wish that when we had recovered, we had shown more charity and kindness in light of our past suffering, instead of just feeling proud about our bravery in staying put. It's not like everyone who leaves is a coward, nor can we assume that those who stay aren't sometimes just ignorant or dismissive of the power of their Creator—which is a reckless kind of despair, not real courage.

I cannot but leave it upon record that the civil officers, such as constables, head-boroughs, Lord Mayor’s and sheriffs’-men, as also parish officers, whose business it was to take charge of the poor, did their duties in general with as much courage as any, and perhaps with more, because their work was attended with more hazards, and lay more among the poor, who were more subject to be infected, and in the most pitiful plight when they were taken with the infection. But then it must be added, too, that a great number of them died; indeed it was scarce possible it should be otherwise.

I must make a note that the civil officers, like constables, neighborhood leaders, the Lord Mayor’s team, and sheriffs, as well as local parish officers responsible for the welfare of the poor, generally performed their duties with just as much courage as anyone, and perhaps even more. This was because their work came with greater risks and was often done among the poor, who were more vulnerable to infection and in the most desperate situations when they did get sick. However, it should also be noted that many of them died; in fact, it was hardly avoidable.

I have not said one word here about the physic or preparations that we ordinarily made use of on this terrible occasion—I mean we that went frequently abroad and up down street, as I did; much of this was talked of in the books and bills of our quack doctors, of whom I have said enough already. It may, however, be added, that the College of Physicians were daily publishing several preparations, which they had considered of in the process of their practice, and which, being to be had in print, I avoid repeating them for that reason.

I haven't mentioned anything about the medicine or treatments we usually relied on during this terrible time—I mean those of us who often ventured out and about, like I did; a lot of this was discussed in the books and advertisements of our quack doctors, of whom I've said enough already. However, it's worth noting that the College of Physicians was daily publishing several remedies they deemed effective in their practice, and since these are available in printed form, I won't repeat them for that reason.

One thing I could not help observing: what befell one of the quacks, who published that he had a most excellent preservative against the plague, which whoever kept about them should never be infected or liable to infection. This man, who, we may reasonably suppose, did not go abroad without some of this excellent preservative in his pocket, yet was taken by the distemper, and carried off in two or three days.

One thing I couldn’t help noticing was what happened to one of the frauds who claimed he had an amazing cure for the plague. He said that anyone who carried it would never get infected or be at risk of infection. This guy, who we can assume didn’t leave home without some of his so-called cure in his pocket, ended up getting the disease and died in just two or three days.

I am not of the number of the physic-haters or physic-despisers; on the contrary, I have often mentioned the regard I had to the dictates of my particular friend Dr Heath; but yet I must acknowledge I made use of little or nothing—except, as I have observed, to keep a preparation of strong scent to have ready, in case I met with anything of offensive smells or went too near any burying-place or dead body.

I don’t belong to the group of people who hate or look down on medicine; in fact, I’ve often mentioned how much I value the advice of my close friend, Dr. Heath. However, I have to admit that I used little to nothing—except, as I’ve said, for keeping a strong perfume on hand in case I encountered any unpleasant smells or got too close to a burial site or a dead body.

Neither did I do what I know some did: keep the spirits always high and hot with cordials and wine and such things; and which, as I observed, one learned physician used himself so much to as that he could not leave them off when the infection was quite gone, and so became a sot for all his life after.

I didn't do what I know some people did: keep the spirits always high and energized with drinks and wine and stuff; and as I noticed, one learned doctor got so used to it that he couldn't stop even when the infection was completely gone, and ended up being a drunk for the rest of his life.

I remember my friend the doctor used to say that there was a certain set of drugs and preparations which were all certainly good and useful in the case of an infection; out of which, or with which, physicians might make an infinite variety of medicines, as the ringers of bells make several hundred different rounds of music by the changing and order or sound but in six bells, and that all these preparations shall be really very good: ‘Therefore,’ said he, ‘I do not wonder that so vast a throng of medicines is offered in the present calamity, and almost every physician prescribes or prepares a different thing, as his judgement or experience guides him; but’, says my friend, ‘let all the prescriptions of all the physicians in London be examined, and it will be found that they are all compounded of the same things, with such variations only as the particular fancy of the doctor leads him to; so that’, says he, ‘every man, judging a little of his own constitution and manner of his living, and circumstances of his being infected, may direct his own medicines out of the ordinary drugs and preparations. Only that’, says he, ‘some recommend one thing as most sovereign, and some another. Some’, says he, ‘think that pill. ruff., which is called itself the anti-pestilential pill is the best preparation that can be made; others think that Venice treacle is sufficient of itself to resist the contagion; and I’, says he, ‘think as both these think, viz., that the last is good to take beforehand to prevent it, and the first, if touched, to expel it.’ According to this opinion, I several times took Venice treacle, and a sound sweat upon it, and thought myself as well fortified against the infection as any one could be fortified by the power of physic.

I remember my friend, the doctor, used to say that there was a certain group of drugs and treatments that were definitely beneficial for infections; using these, or combining them, doctors could create countless different medicines, similar to how bell ringers can create hundreds of variations of music with just six bells. He believed that all these treatments were genuinely effective: ‘So,’ he said, ‘it’s no surprise that such a huge number of medicines are available during this crisis, and nearly every doctor prescribes or prepares something different based on their judgment or experience; but,’ my friend added, ‘if you look at all the prescriptions from doctors in London, you’ll see they’re all made from the same ingredients, with variations based on the specific preferences of each doctor. So,’ he said, ‘anyone can choose their own treatments from the common drugs and preparations, considering their own health, lifestyle, and the specifics of their exposure to the infection. The only catch,’ he noted, ‘is that some doctors favor one remedy as the best while others prefer another. Some believe that the pill called the anti-pestilential pill is the most effective, while others think that Venice treacle is enough to fight off the contagion. Personally,’ he said, ‘I agree with both views: I think it's good to take Venice treacle beforehand to prevent infection, and the other pill to get rid of it if you come down with it.’ Based on this belief, I took Venice treacle several times, followed by a strong sweat, and felt as well protected against the infection as anyone could be through the power of medicine.

As for quackery and mountebanks, of which the town was so full, I listened to none of them, and have observed often since, with some wonder, that for two years after the plague I scarcely saw or heard of one of them about town. Some fancied they were all swept away in the infection to a man, and were for calling it a particular mark of God’s vengeance upon them for leading the poor people into the pit of destruction, merely for the lucre of a little money they got by them; but I cannot go that length neither. That abundance of them died is certain—many of them came within the reach of my own knowledge—but that all of them were swept off I much question. I believe rather they fled into the country and tried their practices upon the people there, who were in apprehension of the infection before it came among them.

As for the scammers and charlatans that the town was filled with, I didn't pay any attention to them, and I've often wondered since that for two years after the plague, I hardly saw or heard of any of them around town. Some people thought they were all wiped out by the disease, seeing it as a sign of God's punishment for misleading the vulnerable into danger just for a little profit. But I’m not entirely convinced of that either. It’s true that many of them died—some I personally knew—but I seriously doubt that they were all gone. I believe they actually fled to the countryside and continued their scams on people there, who were scared of the infection before it even reached them.

This, however, is certain, not a man of them appeared for a great while in or about London. There were, indeed, several doctors who published bills recommending their several physical preparations for cleansing the body, as they call it, after the plague, and needful, as they said, for such people to take who had been visited and had been cured; whereas I must own I believe that it was the opinion of the most eminent physicians at that time that the plague was itself a sufficient purge, and that those who escaped the infection needed no physic to cleanse their bodies of any other things; the running sores, the tumours, &c., which were broke and kept open by the directions of the physicians, having sufficiently cleansed them; and that all other distempers, and causes of distempers, were effectually carried off that way; and as the physicians gave this as their opinions wherever they came, the quacks got little business.

This, however, is certain: none of them showed up in London for quite a while. There were, of course, several doctors who put out advertisements promoting their various treatments for “cleansing the body” after the plague, claiming these were necessary for people who had been affected and were now cured. However, I have to say I believe that the leading physicians of that time thought the plague itself was a good enough purge, and that those who survived the infection didn’t need any medicine to cleanse their bodies of anything else. The running sores, the tumors, etc., which were opened and kept that way by the doctors, had already done that job; and all other ailments and causes of ailments were effectively cleared away that way. Since the physicians shared this opinion wherever they went, the quacks had very little business.

There were, indeed, several little hurries which happened after the decrease of the plague, and which, whether they were contrived to fright and disorder the people, as some imagined, I cannot say, but sometimes we were told the plague would return by such a time; and the famous Solomon Eagle, the naked Quaker I have mentioned, prophesied evil tidings every day; and several others telling us that London had not been sufficiently scourged, and that sorer and severer strokes were yet behind. Had they stopped there, or had they descended to particulars, and told us that the city should the next year be destroyed by fire, then, indeed, when we had seen it come to pass, we should not have been to blame to have paid more than a common respect to their prophetic spirits; at least we should have wondered at them, and have been more serious in our inquiries after the meaning of it, and whence they had the foreknowledge. But as they generally told us of a relapse into the plague, we have had no concern since that about them; yet by those frequent clamours, we were all kept with some kind of apprehensions constantly upon us; and if any died suddenly, or if the spotted fevers at any time increased, we were presently alarmed; much more if the number of the plague increased, for to the end of the year there were always between 200 and 300 of the plague. On any of these occasions, I say, we were alarmed anew.

There were definitely a few little panics that occurred after the plague lessened, and whether they were meant to scare and confuse people, as some believed, I can't say for sure. Sometimes we heard that the plague would come back by a certain time; and the well-known Solomon Eagle, the naked Quaker I mentioned, predicted bad news every day. Others warned us that London hadn’t been punished enough, and that worse things were still to come. If they had stopped there, or if they had gone into details and told us that the city would be destroyed by fire the next year, then, when we saw it happen, we wouldn’t have been wrong to think more highly of their prophetic insights. At the very least, we would have been intrigued and would have looked more seriously into what it all meant and where they got their predictions from. But since they mostly warned us about a return of the plague, we didn't really worry about them after that. However, those constant warnings kept us somewhat on edge, and if anyone died unexpectedly, or if the fever cases increased at any point, we would immediately be alarmed; even more so if the number of plague cases rose, since by the end of the year there were always between 200 and 300 plague cases. In any of these situations, I say, we were alarmed all over again.

Those who remember the city of London before the fire must remember that there was then no such place as we now call Newgate Market, but that in the middle of the street which is now called Blowbladder Street, and which had its name from the butchers, who used to kill and dress their sheep there (and who, it seems, had a custom to blow up their meat with pipes to make it look thicker and fatter than it was, and were punished there for it by the Lord Mayor); I say, from the end of the street towards Newgate there stood two long rows of shambles for the selling meat.

Those who remember London before the fire must recall that there was no place we now know as Newgate Market. Instead, in the middle of what is now Blowbladder Street, named after the butchers who used to slaughter and prepare their sheep there (and who reportedly had a habit of inflating their meat with pipes to make it appear thicker and fatter than it really was, leading to punishment from the Lord Mayor); I mean, at the end of the street towards Newgate, there were two long rows of stalls for selling meat.

It was in those shambles that two persons falling down dead, as they were buying meat, gave rise to a rumour that the meat was all infected; which, though it might affright the people, and spoiled the market for two or three days, yet it appeared plainly afterwards that there was nothing of truth in the suggestion. But nobody can account for the possession of fear when it takes hold of the mind.

It was in those ruins that two people collapsed and died while buying meat, sparking a rumor that the meat was contaminated. This, although it scared the public and disrupted the market for a couple of days, clearly turned out to be untrue. But no one can explain why fear takes hold of the mind.

However, it Pleased God, by the continuing of the winter weather, so to restore the health of the city that by February following we reckoned the distemper quite ceased, and then we were not so easily frighted again.

However, it pleased God that the winter weather continued long enough to restore the city’s health, so by the following February, we figured the illness had completely stopped, and after that, we weren't so easily scared again.

There was still a question among the learned, and at first perplexed the people a little: and that was in what manner to purge the house and goods where the plague had been, and how to render them habitable again, which had been left empty during the time of the plague. Abundance of perfumes and preparations were prescribed by physicians, some of one kind and some of another, in which the people who listened to them put themselves to a great, and indeed, in my opinion, to an unnecessary expense; and the poorer people, who only set open their windows night and day, burned brimstone, pitch, and gunpowder, and such things in their rooms, did as well as the best; nay, the eager people who, as I said above, came home in haste and at all hazards, found little or no inconvenience in their houses, nor in the goods, and did little or nothing to them.

There was still a question among the knowledgeable, which initially confused people a little: how to clean the house and belongings where the plague had been, and how to make them livable again after being left empty during the plague. Doctors recommended various perfumes and remedies, some of one kind and some of another, which caused those who listened to them to spend a lot of money, and in my view, it was mostly unnecessary. The poorer folks, who simply opened their windows night and day, burned sulfur, pitch, gunpowder, and similar things in their rooms, and did just as well as the best. In fact, the eager individuals who hurried home despite the risks found little to no issues in their houses or belongings and did very little to address them.

However, in general, prudent, cautious people did enter into some measures for airing and sweetening their houses, and burned perfumes, incense, benjamin, rozin, and sulphur in their rooms close shut up, and then let the air carry it all out with a blast of gunpowder; others caused large fires to be made all day and all night for several days and nights; by the same token that two or three were pleased to set their houses on fire, and so effectually sweetened them by burning them down to the ground; as particularly one at Ratcliff, one in Holbourn, and one at Westminster; besides two or three that were set on fire, but the fire was happily got out again before it went far enough to burn down the houses; and one citizen’s servant, I think it was in Thames Street, carried so much gunpowder into his master’s house, for clearing it of the infection, and managed it so foolishly, that he blew up part of the roof of the house. But the time was not fully come that the city was to be purged by fire, nor was it far off; for within nine months more I saw it all lying in ashes; when, as some of our quacking philosophers pretend, the seeds of the plague were entirely destroyed, and not before; a notion too ridiculous to speak of here: since, had the seeds of the plague remained in the houses, not to be destroyed but by fire, how has it been that they have not since broken out, seeing all those buildings in the suburbs and liberties, all in the great parishes of Stepney, Whitechappel, Aldgate, Bishopsgate, Shoreditch, Cripplegate, and St Giles, where the fire never came, and where the plague raged with the greatest violence, remain still in the same condition they were in before?

However, generally, careful and cautious people took some steps to ventilate and freshen up their homes. They burned perfumes, incense, benjamin, rosin, and sulfur in their tightly shut rooms and then let the air blow it all out with a blast of gunpowder. Others burned large fires day and night for several days. Similarly, a few people decided to set their houses on fire, effectively freshening them by burning them down to the ground; this happened to one place in Ratcliff, one in Holbourn, and one in Westminster; in addition to two or three that caught fire but were fortunate enough to be extinguished before they could burn the houses down. There was also an incident where a citizen's servant, I believe it was in Thames Street, brought so much gunpowder into his master’s house to clear it of infection that he foolishly blew part of the roof off. But it wasn’t yet time for the city to be cleansed by fire, though it wasn't far off; because within nine months, I saw it all reduced to ashes. As some of our self-proclaimed philosophers claim, the seeds of the plague were completely destroyed then, but not before—a notion too ridiculous to discuss here. If the seeds of the plague had remained in the houses and could only have been destroyed by fire, then why haven’t they reemerged, considering all those buildings in the suburbs and areas like Stepney, Whitechapel, Aldgate, Bishopsgate, Shoreditch, Cripplegate, and St Giles, where the fire never reached and the plague was the most intense, are still in the same condition they were before?

But to leave these things just as I found them, it was certain that those people who were more than ordinarily cautious of their health, did take particular directions for what they called seasoning of their houses, and abundance of costly things were consumed on that account which I cannot but say not only seasoned those houses, as they desired, but filled the air with very grateful and wholesome smells which others had the share of the benefit of as well as those who were at the expenses of them.

But to leave things just as I found them, it was clear that people who were especially careful about their health took specific steps for what they called seasoning their homes. A lot of expensive items were used for this purpose, and I must say that not only did these items season their homes as they wanted, but they also filled the air with pleasant and healthy scents that everyone benefitted from, not just those who paid for them.

And yet after all, though the poor came to town very precipitantly, as I have said, yet I must say the rich made no such haste. The men of business, indeed, came up, but many of them did not bring their families to town till the spring came on, and that they saw reason to depend upon it that the plague would not return.

And still, even though the poor rushed into town quickly, as I mentioned, I have to say the rich didn't move as fast. Businessmen did come, but many of them waited until spring to bring their families into town, believing that the plague wouldn’t come back.

The Court, indeed, came up soon after Christmas, but the nobility and gentry, except such as depended upon and had employment under the administration, did not come so soon.

The Court did arrive shortly after Christmas, but the nobility and gentry, except for those who relied on and had jobs with the administration, did not come as quickly.

I should have taken notice here that, notwithstanding the violence of the plague in London and in other places, yet it was very observable that it was never on board the fleet; and yet for some time there was a strange press in the river, and even in the streets, for seamen to man the fleet. But it was in the beginning of the year, when the plague was scarce begun, and not at all come down to that part of the city where they usually press for seamen; and though a war with the Dutch was not at all grateful to the people at that time, and the seamen went with a kind of reluctancy into the service, and many complained of being dragged into it by force, yet it proved in the event a happy violence to several of them, who had probably perished in the general calamity, and who, after the summer service was over, though they had cause to lament the desolation of their families—who, when they came back, were many of them in their graves—yet they had room to be thankful that they were carried out of the reach of it, though so much against their wills. We indeed had a hot war with the Dutch that year, and one very great engagement at sea in which the Dutch were worsted, but we lost a great many men and some ships. But, as I observed, the plague was not in the fleet, and when they came to lay up the ships in the river the violent part of it began to abate.

I should have noticed here that, despite the intense outbreak of the plague in London and elsewhere, it was clear that it was never on board the fleet. Yet there was a strange urgency in the river and even in the streets for sailors to man the fleet. This was at the start of the year when the plague had just begun, and it hadn’t reached that part of the city where they usually recruited sailors. Although a war with the Dutch was not welcomed by the people at that time, and the sailors reluctantly joined the service, many complained about being forced into it. Still, it turned out to be a fortunate turn of events for several of them, who likely would have died in the widespread disaster. When they returned after the summer service, although they had reason to mourn their families—many of whom were in their graves—they were thankful to have been kept away from it, even against their will. We indeed had a fierce war with the Dutch that year, including a significant naval battle where the Dutch were defeated, but we lost many men and some ships. However, as I noted, the plague was not in the fleet, and when they came to dock the ships in the river, the worst of the outbreak started to subside.

I would be glad if I could close the account of this melancholy year with some particular examples historically; I mean of the thankfulness to God, our preserver, for our being delivered from this dreadful calamity. Certainly the circumstance of the deliverance, as well as the terrible enemy we were delivered from, called upon the whole nation for it. The circumstances of the deliverance were indeed very remarkable, as I have in part mentioned already, and particularly the dreadful condition which we were all in when we were to the surprise of the whole town made joyful with the hope of a stop of the infection.

I would be happy to wrap up this gloomy year with some specific historical examples; I’m talking about our gratitude to God, our protector, for saving us from this terrible disaster. It's clear that both the nature of our deliverance and the frightening threat we faced called for a national response. The details of our deliverance were truly extraordinary, as I’ve partially mentioned before, especially given the awful situation we were all in when, to everyone's surprise, the whole town felt hope with the possibility of halting the infection.

Nothing but the immediate finger of God, nothing but omnipotent power, could have done it. The contagion despised all medicine; death raged in every corner; and had it gone on as it did then, a few weeks more would have cleared the town of all, and everything that had a soul. Men everywhere began to despair; every heart failed them for fear; people were made desperate through the anguish of their souls, and the terrors of death sat in the very faces and countenances of the people.

Nothing but the direct hand of God, nothing but all-powerful might, could have done it. The disease ignored all medicine; death was rampant everywhere; and if it had continued the way it was going, in just a few more weeks, the town would have been emptied of everyone, and everything that had a soul. People everywhere started to lose hope; fear overwhelmed every heart; desperation set in as their souls suffered, and the terror of death was etched on the faces of the people.

In that very moment when we might very well say, ‘Vain was the help of man’,—I say, in that very moment it pleased God, with a most agreeable surprise, to cause the fury of it to abate, even of itself; and the malignity declining, as I have said, though infinite numbers were sick, yet fewer died, and the very first weeks’ bill decreased 1843; a vast number indeed!

In that very moment when we could easily say, “The help of man was useless,”—I mean, at that very moment it pleased God, with a most pleasant surprise, to let the intensity of it lessen on its own; and while the evil was still present, as I mentioned, even though countless people were sick, fewer died, and the death toll from the first week dropped significantly in 1843; a huge number indeed!

It is impossible to express the change that appeared in the very countenances of the people that Thursday morning when the weekly bill came out. It might have been perceived in their countenances that a secret surprise and smile of joy sat on everybody’s face. They shook one another by the hands in the streets, who would hardly go on the same side of the way with one another before. Where the streets were not too broad they would open their windows and call from one house to another, and ask how they did, and if they had heard the good news that the plague was abated. Some would return, when they said good news, and ask, ‘What good news?’ and when they answered that the plague was abated and the bills decreased almost two thousand, they would cry out, ‘God be praised!’ and would weep aloud for joy, telling them they had heard nothing of it; and such was the joy of the people that it was, as it were, life to them from the grave. I could almost set down as many extravagant things done in the excess of their joy as of their grief; but that would be to lessen the value of it.

It’s impossible to describe the change that showed on the faces of people that Thursday morning when the weekly bill came out. You could see a hidden surprise and a joyful smile on everyone’s face. They shook hands in the streets, where they wouldn’t have even walked on the same side of the road before. In narrower streets, they opened their windows and called out from one house to another, asking how they were doing and if they had heard the good news that the plague was easing up. Some would respond, asking, “What good news?” and when they heard that the plague was subsiding and the death toll had dropped by almost two thousand, they would shout, “Thank God!” and cry tears of joy, saying they hadn’t heard anything about it. The joy of the people was like being brought back to life from the grave. I could almost list as many wild things done out of joy as I could of those done out of grief, but that would undermine its significance.

I must confess myself to have been very much dejected just before this happened; for the prodigious number that were taken sick the week or two before, besides those that died, was such, and the lamentations were so great everywhere, that a man must have seemed to have acted even against his reason if he had so much as expected to escape; and as there was hardly a house but mine in all my neighbourhood but was infected, so had it gone on it would not have been long that there would have been any more neighbours to be infected. Indeed it is hardly credible what dreadful havoc the last three weeks had made, for if I might believe the person whose calculations I always found very well grounded, there were not less than 30,000 people dead and near 100,000 fallen sick in the three weeks I speak of; for the number that sickened was surprising, indeed it was astonishing, and those whose courage upheld them all the time before, sank under it now.

I have to admit that I was feeling really down just before this happened. The huge number of people who got sick a week or two before, along with those who died, was so overwhelming, and the mourning was so intense everywhere, that it would have seemed irrational for anyone to expect to escape it. Almost every house in my neighborhood, except for mine, was infected, and if it had continued like that, it wouldn’t have been long before there were no more neighbors left to get sick. It's hard to believe how much destruction those last three weeks caused. If I can trust the person whose estimates I've always found reliable, there were at least 30,000 people who died and nearly 100,000 who fell ill during those three weeks. The number of people getting sick was shocking—truly astonishing—and even those who had held their courage up to that point finally succumbed to despair.

In the middle of their distress, when the condition of the city of London was so truly calamitous, just then it pleased God—as it were by His immediate hand to disarm this enemy; the poison was taken out of the sting. It was wonderful; even the physicians themselves were surprised at it. Wherever they visited they found their patients better; either they had sweated kindly, or the tumours were broke, or the carbuncles went down and the inflammations round them changed colour, or the fever was gone, or the violent headache was assuaged, or some good symptom was in the case; so that in a few days everybody was recovering, whole families that were infected and down, that had ministers praying with them, and expected death every hour, were revived and healed, and none died at all out of them.

In the midst of their distress, when the situation in London was truly disastrous, it seemed that God, almost by His own hand, decided to disarm this enemy; the poison was taken out of the sting. It was remarkable; even the doctors were surprised. Wherever they went, they found their patients improving; either they had sweat it out, or the tumors had burst, or the carbuncles had subsided, or the inflammation around them changed color, or the fever was gone, or the severe headaches had eased, or there was some positive sign in their condition; so that in just a few days everyone started recovering, whole families that had been infected and were bedridden, with ministers praying for them and expecting death at any moment, were revived and healed, and none of them died.

Nor was this by any new medicine found out, or new method of cure discovered, or by any experience in the operation which the physicians or surgeons attained to; but it was evidently from the secret invisible hand of Him that had at first sent this disease as a judgement upon us; and let the atheistic part of mankind call my saying what they please, it is no enthusiasm; it was acknowledged at that time by all mankind. The disease was enervated and its malignity spent; and let it proceed from whencesoever it will, let the philosophers search for reasons in nature to account for it by, and labour as much as they will to lessen the debt they owe to their Maker, those physicians who had the least share of religion in them were obliged to acknowledge that it was all supernatural, that it was extraordinary, and that no account could be given of it.

This was not due to any new medicine or method of treatment discovered, nor from any expertise gained by doctors or surgeons; it was clearly the result of the secret, invisible hand of the one who initially sent this disease as a judgment on us. Let the atheistic part of humanity call my statement whatever they want; it’s not enthusiasm; it was recognized by everyone at that time. The disease had weakened and its harmful effects had lessened. Regardless of its origin, whether philosophers search for natural explanations or try hard to diminish their debt to their Creator, those physicians with the least amount of faith had to admit that it was all supernatural, extraordinary, and beyond explanation.

If I should say that this is a visible summons to us all to thankfulness, especially we that were under the terror of its increase, perhaps it may be thought by some, after the sense of the thing was over, an officious canting of religious things, preaching a sermon instead of writing a history, making myself a teacher instead of giving my observations of things; and this restrains me very much from going on here as I might otherwise do. But if ten lepers were healed, and but one returned to give thanks, I desire to be as that one, and to be thankful for myself.

If I were to say that this is a clear call for all of us to be grateful, especially for those of us who felt the weight of its increase, some might think that, once the immediate feeling has passed, I'm just being overly pious, preaching instead of writing a history, making myself a teacher instead of sharing my observations. This really holds me back from expressing myself as freely as I would like. But if ten lepers were healed and only one returned to give thanks, I want to be that one and be grateful for myself.

Nor will I deny but there were abundance of people who, to all appearance, were very thankful at that time; for their mouths were stopped, even the mouths of those whose hearts were not extraordinary long affected with it. But the impression was so strong at that time that it could not be resisted; no, not by the worst of the people.

I won’t deny that there were plenty of people who seemed very grateful at that time; their mouths were shut, even those whose hearts weren’t truly moved by it for long. But the impact was so powerful at that moment that it couldn’t be ignored; not even by the worst of people.

It was a common thing to meet people in the street that were strangers, and that we knew nothing at all of, expressing their surprise. Going one day through Aldgate, and a pretty many people being passing and repassing, there comes a man out of the end of the Minories, and looking a little up the street and down, he throws his hands abroad, ‘Lord, what an alteration is here! Why, last week I came along here, and hardly anybody was to be seen.’ Another man—I heard him—adds to his words, ‘’Tis all wonderful; ’tis all a dream.’ ‘Blessed be God,’ says a third man, ‘and let us give thanks to Him, for ’tis all His own doing, human help and human skill was at an end.’ These were all strangers to one another. But such salutations as these were frequent in the street every day; and in spite of a loose behaviour, the very common people went along the streets giving God thanks for their deliverance.

It was common to encounter strangers in the street, expressing their surprise. One day while walking through Aldgate, with many people passing by, a man came out from the end of the Minories. He looked up and down the street, threw his hands wide and exclaimed, “Wow, what a change is here! Just last week I walked through, and there was hardly anyone around.” Another man—I heard him—added, “It’s all incredible; it’s like a dream.” A third man said, “Thank God, and let us give Him thanks, for it’s all His doing; human help and skill have reached their limit.” These men were all strangers to each other. But such exchanges were common in the street every day; and despite some unruly behavior, ordinary people walked the streets giving thanks to God for their safety.

It was now, as I said before, the people had cast off all apprehensions, and that too fast; indeed we were no more afraid now to pass by a man with a white cap upon his head, or with a cloth wrapt round his neck, or with his leg limping, occasioned by the sores in his groin, all which were frightful to the last degree, but the week before. But now the street was full of them, and these poor recovering creatures, give them their due, appeared very sensible of their unexpected deliverance; and I should wrong them very much if I should not acknowledge that I believe many of them were really thankful. But I must own that, for the generality of the people, it might too justly be said of them as was said of the children of Israel after their being delivered from the host of Pharaoh, when they passed the Red Sea, and looked back and saw the Egyptians overwhelmed in the water: viz., that they sang His praise, but they soon forgot His works.

Now, as I mentioned before, people had let go of all their fears, and perhaps too quickly; we weren't scared anymore to walk past someone with a white cap on their head, or wrapped in a cloth around their neck, or limping because of sores on their leg, all of which had terrified us just a week before. But now the street was filled with these poor recovering individuals, and to their credit, they seemed very aware of their unexpected rescue; I would be doing them a disservice if I didn’t recognize that many of them were genuinely grateful. However, I must admit that, for most people, it might be fair to say what was said about the children of Israel after they were freed from Pharaoh's army, when they crossed the Red Sea and looked back to see the Egyptians drowned in the sea: namely, that they praised Him, but quickly forgot His works.

I can go no farther here. I should be counted censorious, and perhaps unjust, if I should enter into the unpleasing work of reflecting, whatever cause there was for it, upon the unthankfulness and return of all manner of wickedness among us, which I was so much an eye-witness of myself. I shall conclude the account of this calamitous year therefore with a coarse but sincere stanza of my own, which I placed at the end of my ordinary memorandums the same year they were written:

I can't go any further here. I would seem judgmental, and maybe even unfair, if I started discussing, no matter the reason, the ingratitude and the resurgence of all kinds of wrongdoing among us, which I witnessed firsthand. So, I'll wrap up the account of this terrible year with a rough but honest stanza of my own that I added to the end of my regular notes that same year:

A dreadful plague in London was
In the year sixty-five,
Which swept an hundred thousand souls
Away; yet I alive!

A terrible plague hit London
In sixty-five,
That took away a hundred thousand lives,
Yet here I am alive!

H. F.

H.F.

FINIS


Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!