This is a modern-English version of Natural History of Cottonmouth Moccasin, Agkistrodon piscovorus (Reptilia), originally written by Burkett, Ray D.. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.


double bar

University of Kansas Press
Natural History Museum

Vol. 17, No. 9, pp. 435-491, 7 figures in text

bar  October 27, 1966  bar

Natural History of Cottonmouth Moccasin,

Agkistrodon piscivorus (Reptilia)

BY

RAY D. BURKETT

University of Kansas
Lawrence1966


University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History

Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman, Henry S. Fitch,
Frank B. Cross

Vol. 17, No. 9, pp. 435-491, 7 figures in text
Published October 27, 1966

University of Kansas
Lawrence, Kansas

PRINTED BY
ROBERT R. (BOB) SANDERS, STATE PRINTER
TOPEKA, KANSAS
1966

31-4629

Natural History of Cottonmouth Moccasin,
Agkistrodon piscivorus (Reptilia)

BY
RAY D. BURKETT


CONTENTS

    PAGE
Intro 439
Acknowledgments 440
Systematic Relationships and Distribution 441
Description 444
  Color and Pattern 444
  Scutellation 444
  Dentition 449
Habitat and Limiting Factors 450
Reproduction 452
  Courtship and Mating 452
  Reproductive Cycles 452
  Embryonic Development 454
  Birth of Young 454
  Number of Young per Litter 454
  Population Composition 455
  Reproductive Potential 455
Growth and Development 456
  Size at Birth and Early Growth 456
  The Umbilical Scar 457
  Later Growth and Bodily Proportions 457
Shedding 459
  The Shedding Operation 459
  Frequency of Shedding 460
Eating Habits 461
  Methods of Obtaining Prey 461
  Food and Food Preferences 462
Factors Influencing Mortality 465
  Natural Enemies and Predators 465
  Parasites and Diseases 465
  Miscellaneous Causes of Death 466
Conduct 466
  Annual and Diel Cycles of Activity 466
  Basking 469
  Coiling 469
  Locomotion 470
  Disposition 470
  Defense and Escape 471
  "Head Bobbing" 471
  Combat Dance 472
The Venomous 473
  Properties of the Venom 473
  Venom Yield and Toxicity 473
  Susceptibility of Snakes 475
The Bite 476
  Effects of the Bite 476
  Treatment 477
  Case History of a Bite 479
  Snakebite in the United States 480
Summary 480
References 485

INTRODUCTION

Objectives of the study here reported on were to: (1) learn as much as possible concerning the natural history and economic importance of the cottonmouth; (2) determine what factors limit its geographic distribution; (3) determine the role of the cottonmouth in its ecological community; and (4) compare the cottonmouth's life history with that of other crotalid snakes, especially the kinds that are most closely related to it.

The objectives of this study were to: (1) gather as much information as possible about the natural history and economic significance of the cottonmouth; (2) identify the factors that limit its geographic distribution; (3) examine the cottonmouth's role in its ecological community; and (4) compare the cottonmouth's life history with that of other crotalid snakes, particularly those that are most closely related to it.

Twenty-five live cottonmouths were kept in the laboratory for the purpose of studying behavior and fang shedding and for comparison of measurements with those of preserved specimens. Live snakes were obtained in Brazoria and Nacogdoches counties, Texas, from Hermann Park Zoo, Houston, Texas, and from the late Paul Anderson of Independence, Missouri. Preserved western cottonmouths were examined for the purpose of determining variation, distribution, food habits, body proportions, embryonic development, and reproductive cycles. The cottonmouths examined include: 221 from Texas; 33 from Arkansas; 22 from Louisiana; 2 from Illinois; and 1 each from Kansas, Mississippi, and Oklahoma.

Twenty-five live cottonmouths were kept in the lab to study their behavior and fang shedding and to compare their measurements with those of preserved specimens. Live snakes were collected in Brazoria and Nacogdoches counties in Texas, from Hermann Park Zoo in Houston, Texas, and from the late Paul Anderson in Independence, Missouri. Preserved western cottonmouths were examined to determine variation, distribution, food habits, body proportions, embryonic development, and reproductive cycles. The cottonmouths studied include: 221 from Texas; 33 from Arkansas; 22 from Louisiana; 2 from Illinois; and 1 each from Kansas, Mississippi, and Oklahoma.

In the preparation of this report I have examined all available literature pertaining to the cottonmouth and have drawn from these sources for comparative or additional material. Some of the more noteworthy contributions to knowledge of the cottonmouth are the general accounts of the life history by Allen and Swindell (1948), Barbour (1956), and Wright and Wright (1957); the publications by Gloyd and Conant (1943) concerning taxonomy; Klimstra (1959) concerning food habits; and Allen (1937), Parrish and Pollard (1959), Swanson (1946), and Wolff and Githens (1939b) concerning the venom. Numerous other publications, although brief, contain worthwhile contributions. Also of special interest as a source of material for comparison of cottonmouths with other crotalids are the works of Fitch (1960) on the copperhead and of Klauber (1956) on the rattlesnakes.

In preparing this report, I have reviewed all the literature available on the cottonmouth and have gathered information from these sources for comparison or additional details. Some of the more significant contributions to our understanding of the cottonmouth include the general accounts of its life history by Allen and Swindell (1948), Barbour (1956), and Wright and Wright (1957); the publications by Gloyd and Conant (1943) related to taxonomy; Klimstra (1959) about its food habits; and Allen (1937), Parrish and Pollard (1959), Swanson (1946), and Wolff and Githens (1939b) that discuss the venom. Many other publications, though brief, also offer valuable insights. Additionally, works by Fitch (1960) on the copperhead and Klauber (1956) on rattlesnakes are particularly interesting for comparing cottonmouths with other pit vipers.

The cottonmouth has been well known for nearly 200 years. Wright and Wright (1957) listed the following vernacular names that are applied to the cottonmouth: black moccasin, black snake, blunt-tail moccasin, congo, copperhead, cottonmouth water moccasin, cotton-mouthed snake, gapper, highland moccasin, lowland moccasin, mangrove rattler, moccasin, North American cottonmouth snake, North American water moccasin, North American water viper, pilot, rusty moccasin, salt-water rattler, stubtail, stump [440] (-tail) moccasin, stump-tail viper, swamp lion, Texas Moccasin, trapjaw, Troost's moccasin, true horn snake, true water moccasin, viper, water mokeson, water pilot, water rattlesnake, and water viper.

The cottonmouth has been well known for nearly 200 years. Wright and Wright (1957) listed the following common names used for the cottonmouth: black moccasin, black snake, blunt-tail moccasin, congo, copperhead, cottonmouth water moccasin, cotton-mouthed snake, gapper, highland moccasin, lowland moccasin, mangrove rattler, moccasin, North American cottonmouth snake, North American water moccasin, North American water viper, pilot, rusty moccasin, saltwater rattler, stubtail, stump [440] (-tail) moccasin, stump-tail viper, swamp lion, Texas Moccasin, trapjaw, Troost's moccasin, true horn snake, true water moccasin, viper, water mokeson, water pilot, water rattlesnake, and water viper.

Some of the names listed above are based upon superstition and folklore prevailing in pioneer times, and others are based upon the behavior or appearance of the snake at various ages. Names like "stump-tail moccasin" are derived from the appearance of females which have short tails or snakes that have lost part of the tail. Names like "gapper" and "trapjaw" came to be applied because of the habit of the snake's lying with its mouth open when approached. The name "cottonmouth" also was derived from this behavior, although the lining of the mouth is whitish in most other snakes. The term "rattlesnake" may have come from the fact that the cottonmouth vibrates its tail vigorously when nervous as do many other snakes, or it may have been confused with rattlesnakes. Because of the general public's fear of snakes and their reluctance to learn to discriminate between the poisonous and harmless species, numerous kinds of snakes seen in or near water have been called moccasins. The general appearance, pugnacious behavior, and whitish mouth of water-snakes (Natrix) have earned them a bad reputation. In fact, a great majority of the "cottonmouths" reported in many areas are found to be water-snakes.

Some of the names mentioned above come from the superstitions and folklore that were common in pioneer times, while others are based on how snakes act or look at different ages. Names like "stump-tail moccasin" come from the appearance of females with short tails or snakes that have lost part of their tail. Names like "gapper" and "trapjaw" were given because these snakes often lie with their mouths open when someone approaches. The name "cottonmouth" also comes from this behavior, even though most other snakes have a whitish lining in their mouths. The term "rattlesnake" might have originated from the cottonmouth shaking its tail vigorously when it's nervous, much like many other snakes do, or it could have been mixed up with actual rattlesnakes. Due to the general fear of snakes and the public's hesitation to distinguish between venomous and harmless species, many types of snakes seen in or around water have been called moccasins. The overall look, aggressive behavior, and whitish mouth of water snakes (Natrix) have given them a bad reputation. In fact, most of the "cottonmouths" reported in various areas turn out to be water snakes.

The cottonmouth is economically important mainly because of the injurious or fatal effects of its bite and the psychological effect that its actual or suspected presence has upon many persons. The species eats a wide variety of prey items and helps to prevent overabundance of certain kinds of organisms. The venom has been used in the therapeutic treatment of blood clots owing to its anticoagulant properties (Didisheim and Lewis, 1956). It also is employed in the treatment of haemorrhagic conditions and rheumatoid arthritis, as well as in the production of antivenin (Allen and Swindell, op cit.:13). None of these uses of venom has become widely accepted, and its value is questionable.

The cottonmouth is economically significant mainly because of the harmful or deadly consequences of its bite and the psychological impact that its actual or perceived presence has on many people. This snake consumes a wide range of prey and helps control the population of certain organisms. The venom has been used in treating blood clots due to its blood-thinning properties (Didisheim and Lewis, 1956). It is also used for treating bleeding disorders and rheumatoid arthritis, as well as in making antivenin (Allen and Swindell, op cit.:13). However, none of these uses of venom have gained widespread acceptance, and its value remains uncertain.


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

For guidance in the course of my study, I am especially indebted to Professor Henry S. Fitch. For suggestions concerning the preparation of the manuscript, I thank Professor E. Raymond Hall. I am grateful to my wife, Janis, for her invaluable assistance and for typing the manuscript.

For guidance throughout my studies, I'm especially grateful to Professor Henry S. Fitch. I also want to thank Professor E. Raymond Hall for his suggestions on preparing the manuscript. I appreciate my wife, Janis, for her invaluable help and for typing the manuscript.

For use of specimens in their care, I thank Professors William E. Duellman, University of Kansas; Robert L. Packard, formerly of Stephen F. Austin State College; W. Frank Blair, University of Texas; and William B. Davis and

For the specimens in their care, I thank Professors William E. Duellman, University of Kansas; Robert L. Packard, formerly of Stephen F. Austin State College; W. Frank Blair, University of Texas; and William B. Davis and

Richard J. Baldauf, Texas Agricultural and Mechanical College. Mr. John E. Werler of the Hermann Park Zoo, Houston, Texas, contributed live individuals; Mr. Richard S. Funk contributed information on the birth of a brood of cottonmouths; and Dr. Henry M. Parrish contributed information on the incidence of snakebite. To numerous other persons at leading museums throughout the United States for information on the cottonmouths in their collections, to all who helped with the field work in various ways, and to others at the University of Kansas for their help and suggestions I am grateful.

Richard J. Baldauf, Texas A&M University. Mr. John E. Werler from the Hermann Park Zoo in Houston, Texas, provided live specimens; Mr. Richard S. Funk shared details about the birth of a brood of cottonmouths; and Dr. Henry M. Parrish offered information on snakebite occurrences. I am thankful to many other individuals at leading museums across the United States for their insights on the cottonmouths in their collections, to everyone who assisted with fieldwork in various ways, and to others at the University of Kansas for their support and suggestions.


SYSTEMATIC RELATIONSHIPS AND DISTRIBUTION

Snakes of the genus Agkistrodon are relatively primitive members of the Crotalidae, which is one of the most specialized families of snakes. A majority of the pit-vipers are found in the Americas, but close relatives are found from extreme southeastern Europe through temperate Asia to Japan (A. halys) and southeastern Asia including Indonesia (Agkistrodon and Trimeresurus). Familial characters include: vertical pupil of the eye; facial pit present between the preoculars and loreal; scales usually keeled; short, rotatable maxilla bearing a large hollow fang; toothless premaxilla; chiefly hematoxic venom; and undivided anal plate.

Snakes of the genus Agkistrodon are relatively primitive members of the Crotalidae family, which is one of the most specialized groups of snakes. Most pit vipers are found in the Americas, but close relatives can be found from extreme southeastern Europe through temperate Asia to Japan (A. halys) and southeastern Asia, including Indonesia (Agkistrodon and Trimeresurus). Key characteristics include: vertical pupils; a facial pit located between the preoculars and loreal scales; usually keeled scales; a short, rotatable maxilla with a large hollow fang; a toothless premaxilla; primarily hematoxic venom; and an undivided anal plate.

The genus Agkistrodon includes about nine species in the Old World and three in North and Central America. Some of the primitive characters of the genus are: head covered with nine enlarged shields or having the internasals and prefrontals broken up into small scales; subcaudals on proximal part of tail undivided; fangs relatively short; tail lacking rattles. In one species, A. rhodostoma, the scales are smooth; and the female is oviparous and guards her eggs until they hatch. Other species have keeled scales and are ovo-viviparous.

The genus Agkistrodon includes about nine species in the Old World and three in North and Central America. Some of the primitive features of the genus are: a head covered with nine enlarged shields or having the internasals and prefrontals broken into small scales; undivided subcaudals on the proximal part of the tail; relatively short fangs; and a tail that lacks rattles. In one species, A. rhodostoma, the scales are smooth, and the female is oviparous, guarding her eggs until they hatch. Other species have keeled scales and are ovo-viviparous.

There is little paleontological evidence illustrating evolution of the cottonmouth or for that matter of crotalids in general. Brattstrom (1954) summarized the current knowledge of fossil pit-vipers in North America. The few fossils found of the cottonmouth are from Alacha, Brevard, Citrus, Levy, Pasco, and Pinellas counties, Florida (Brattstrom, op. cit.:35; Auffenberg, 1963:202). All are of late Pleistocene Age and well within the present geographic range of the cottonmouth.

There is limited fossil evidence showing the evolution of the cottonmouth or, for that matter, crotalids in general. Brattstrom (1954) summarized the existing knowledge of fossil pit vipers in North America. The few fossils of the cottonmouth that have been discovered come from Alachua, Brevard, Citrus, Levy, Pasco, and Pinellas counties in Florida (Brattstrom, op. cit.:35; Auffenberg, 1963:202). All are from the late Pleistocene era and well within the current geographic range of the cottonmouth.

Of crotalid genera only Agkistrodon occurs in both the Old World and the New World, suggesting that this genus is relatively old. Schmidt (1946: 149-150) mentioned several other closely related groups of animals found in both eastern Asia and eastern North America, including the reptilian genera: Natrix, Opheodrys, Elaphe, Ophisaurus, Leiolopisma (= Lygosoma), Eumeces, Clemmys, Emmys, and Alligator. Of the groups of animals now confined to these two regions the most important are the cryptobranchid salamanders, the genus Alligator, and the spoon-bills (Psephurus in China and Polyodon in the Mississippi drainage). Fossil evidence for these groups indicates that existing forms common to eastern Asia and eastern North America are remnants of a late Cretaceous or early Tertiary Holarctic fauna which was forced southward as the climate became gradually cooler to the north. "Other clues suggest that both Agkistrodon and Trimeresurus (Bothrops) moved from Asia to America, one of these presumably giving rise to the rattlesnakes." (Darlington, 1957:228).

Of crotalid genera, only Agkistrodon is found in both the Old World and the New World, indicating that this genus is quite old. Schmidt (1946: 149-150) noted several other closely related animal groups present in both eastern Asia and eastern North America, including the reptilian genera: Natrix, Opheodrys, Elaphe, Ophisaurus, Leiolopisma (= Lygosoma), Eumeces, Clemmys, Emmys, and Alligator. Among the animal groups now limited to these two regions, the most significant are the cryptobranchid salamanders, the genus Alligator, and the spoon-bills (Psephurus in China and Polyodon in the Mississippi drainage). Fossil evidence for these groups suggests that the existing forms common to eastern Asia and eastern North America are remnants of a late Cretaceous or early Tertiary Holarctic fauna that was pushed southward as the climate gradually cooled in the north. "Other clues suggest that both Agkistrodon and Trimeresurus (Bothrops) migrated from Asia to America, with one of these presumably giving rise to the rattlesnakes." (Darlington, 1957:228).

The named, American kinds of Agkistrodon currently are arranged as three species: the copperhead, the cantil and the cottonmouth. The copperhead (A. contortrix) is divided into four subspecies, all of which are terrestrial. This species occurs from southern New England to eastern Kansas and along the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal plains, exclusive of peninsular Florida and the delta of the Mississippi River in Louisiana. It extends southwest from Kansas through the Edwards Plateau of west-central Texas. Isolated populations occur in the Chisos and Davis mountains of Trans-Pecos Texas. The cantil or Mexican moccasin (A. bilineatus), probably the nearest relative of the cottonmouth (A. piscivorus), is divisible into two subspecies and occupies a nearly complementary range from Mexico south to Nicaragua. The cottonmouth occurs throughout the coastal plains of the southeastern United States, usually at altitudes of 500 feet or less. Two subspecies are recognized, the eastern A. p. piscivorus and the western A. p. leucostoma. A revision of the genus is underway by Professor Howard K. Gloyd.

The American types of Agkistrodon are currently classified into three species: the copperhead, the cantil, and the cottonmouth. The copperhead (A. contortrix) is split into four subspecies, all of which are terrestrial. This species is found from southern New England to eastern Kansas and along the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal plains, excluding peninsular Florida and the Mississippi River delta in Louisiana. It spreads southwest from Kansas through the Edwards Plateau in west-central Texas. There are isolated populations in the Chisos and Davis mountains of Trans-Pecos Texas. The cantil or Mexican moccasin (A. bilineatus), which is likely the closest relative to the cottonmouth (A. piscivorus), is divided into two subspecies and has a nearly overlapping range from Mexico south to Nicaragua. The cottonmouth is found throughout the coastal plains of the southeastern United States, typically at altitudes of 500 feet or lower. There are two recognized subspecies: the eastern A. p. piscivorus and the western A. p. leucostoma. A revision of the genus is being conducted by Professor Howard K. Gloyd.

The basic pattern and various behavioral traits are common to all three species. The young are more nearly alike in appearance than adults, the copperhead and the cottonmouth being easily confused. Adults differ in color, size, body proportions, habitat, and habits. In range and habitat preference the cottonmouth more closely resembles the southern subspecies of the copperhead, A. c. contortrix, which is usually found in lowlands, near swamps and streams, but seldom in water.

The basic pattern and various behavioral traits are similar across all three species. The young look more alike than the adults, with the copperhead and cottonmouth often being mistaken for each other. Adults vary in color, size, body proportions, habitat, and behaviors. In terms of range and habitat preference, the cottonmouth more closely resembles the southern subspecies of the copperhead, A. c. contortrix, which is typically found in lowlands, near swamps and streams, but rarely in water.

Fig. 1. Geographic range of the cottonmouth Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Geographic range of the cottonmouth, showing marginal and near-marginal records, based largely upon maps by Gloyd and Conant (1943:165) and Conant (1958:336) but including additional records. The more important of these records (from east to west) are discussed in the following paragraphs. Crosshatching indicates the area of intergradation between the eastern and western subspecies. Old records, indicated by dates, and their sources are as follows: 1850's and 1891—U. S. National Museum numbers 4263 and 32753 respectively; 1897—Hurter (1897); and 1895—Stejneger (1895:408).

Fig. 1. Geographic range of the cottonmouth, showing marginal and near-marginal records, based mostly on maps by Gloyd and Conant (1943:165) and Conant (1958:336), but also including additional records. The more significant of these records (from east to west) are discussed in the following paragraphs. Crosshatching indicates the area of intergradation between the eastern and western subspecies. Old records, indicated by dates, and their sources are as follows: 1850s and 1891—U.S. National Museum numbers 4263 and 32753 respectively; 1897—Hurter (1897); and 1895—Stejneger (1895:408).

The northernmost record for the eastern subspecies is in the Petersburg area, Prince George County, Virginia (Anon., 1953:24). A sight record (Hickman, 1922:39) near Bristol, West Virginia, probably was based on a water-snake (Natrix sp.), since the stream in which the snake was seen flows north into the Ohio River rather than southeast through Virginia. In North Carolina the most inland record is from the Neuse River, six to eight miles east of Raleigh (Stejneger, 1895:408). Neill (1947:205) reported a population in the vicinity of Dry Fork Creek on the boundary line of Wilkes and Oglethorpe counties, Georgia. Distribution of cottonmouths in Florida is statewide, including the Keys and other offshore islands.

The northernmost record for the eastern subspecies is in the Petersburg area, Prince George County, Virginia (Anon., 1953:24). A sighting record (Hickman, 1922:39) near Bristol, West Virginia, was likely based on a water snake (Natrix sp.), since the stream where the snake was spotted flows north into the Ohio River instead of southeast through Virginia. In North Carolina, the furthest inland record is from the Neuse River, six to eight miles east of Raleigh (Stejneger, 1895:408). Neill (1947:205) reported a population near Dry Fork Creek on the boundary between Wilkes and Oglethorpe counties, Georgia. Cottonmouths are found throughout Florida, including the Keys and other offshore islands.

The ranges of the two subspecies, piscivorus and leucostoma, meet near the eastern border of Mississippi. A. p. piscivorus has been reported from Tishomingo County to the Gulf and east of the Loess Bluff area in central Mississippi, and A. p. leucostoma has been reported from this area westward. A few specimens from along the Coast indicate intergradation (Cook, 1962:33) between the two subspecies.

The ranges of the two subspecies, piscivorus and leucostoma, meet near the eastern border of Mississippi. A. p. piscivorus has been found in Tishomingo County to the Gulf and east of the Loess Bluff area in central Mississippi, while A. p. leucostoma has been reported from this area going west. A few specimens from the Coast suggest there is some mixing (Cook, 1962:33) between the two subspecies.

Barbour (1956:33) reported one specimen from Cypress Creek, in the Green River drainage, Muhlenberg County, Kentucky, and stated that suitable habitat can be found in several areas east of Kentucky Lake. Hence, cottonmouths may have entered this area via the Ohio River. Stejneger (loc. cit.) reported the species in the Wabash River at Mount Carmel, Wabash County, Illinois, and mentioned a former occurrence at Vincennes, Knox County, Indiana; but there are no recent records at these localities. Hurter (1897) reported having seen cottonmouths in Illinois, opposite St. Louis; Smith (1961:265) believes that this and a population in Monroe County, Illinois, are isolated relicts, since no specimens have been found within 50 miles to the south of Monroe County. The specimens reported by Anderson (1941:178; 1945:274) near Chillicothe (three miles southwest and seven miles northwest, respectively), Livingston County, Missouri, also are thought to represent a relict population. Hall and Smith (1947:453) reported one specimen from Jasper County, Missouri, in the Spring River which flows through extreme southeastern Kansas and into Oklahoma and another in the Neosho River at Chetopa, Kansas. Both of these specimens were taken after a flood, and no additional specimens have been taken in this region. Nevertheless, sufficient habitat is probably available along the Neosho and Verdigris rivers in the southeastern part of Kansas.

Barbour (1956:33) reported one specimen from Cypress Creek, in the Green River drainage, Muhlenberg County, Kentucky, and noted that suitable habitat can be found in several areas east of Kentucky Lake. Therefore, cottonmouths may have entered this area via the Ohio River. Stejneger (loc. cit.) reported the species in the Wabash River at Mount Carmel, Wabash County, Illinois, and mentioned a previous occurrence in Vincennes, Knox County, Indiana; however, there are no recent records from these locations. Hurter (1897) reported seeing cottonmouths in Illinois, across from St. Louis; Smith (1961:265) believes that this population and one in Monroe County, Illinois, are isolated remnants, as no specimens have been found within 50 miles south of Monroe County. The specimens reported by Anderson (1941:178; 1945:274) near Chillicothe (three miles southwest and seven miles northwest, respectively), Livingston County, Missouri, are also thought to represent a remnant population. Hall and Smith (1947:453) reported one specimen from Jasper County, Missouri, in the Spring River, which flows through extreme southeastern Kansas and into Oklahoma, and another in the Neosho River at Chetopa, Kansas. Both specimens were collected after a flood, and no additional specimens have been found in this area. However, there is likely enough habitat along the Neosho and Verdigris rivers in southeastern Kansas.

In Texas the cottonmouth has penetrated marginal habitat perhaps farther than anywhere else in its range. Formerly it was thought to be limited to the country east of the Balcones Escarpment (Smith and Buechner, 1947:8), but semiarid areas of the state have been invaded primarily via the Colorado and Brazos River systems up to altitudes of 2300 feet. Two additional specimens are said to have been collected along the Rio Grande. Dr. Howard K. Gloyd (in litt.) stated that the specimen reported from Eagle Pass, Maverick County, is believed to have been taken in the 1850's; and the one said to have come from the mouth of the Devil's River is actually marked "near Santa Rosa, Cameron County, September 30, 1891." No additional specimens have been taken in that area; and the range now probably extends no farther south than Corpus Christi, Texas. Brown's (1903:554) knowledge of the extension of the range of the cottonmouth west of longitude 98° is probably based upon the records along the Rio Grande reported in the nineteenth century.

In Texas, the cottonmouth has encroached into marginal habitats possibly more than anywhere else in its range. It was once believed to be confined to the area east of the Balcones Escarpment (Smith and Buechner, 1947:8), but semiarid regions of the state have been accessed mainly through the Colorado and Brazos River systems, reaching altitudes of up to 2300 feet. Two more specimens are said to have been collected along the Rio Grande. Dr. Howard K. Gloyd (in litt.) mentioned that the specimen reported from Eagle Pass, Maverick County, is thought to have been collected in the 1850s; and the one said to come from the mouth of the Devil's River is actually labeled "near Santa Rosa, Cameron County, September 30, 1891." No further specimens have been found in that area, and the range likely doesn't extend any further south than Corpus Christi, Texas. Brown's (1903:554) knowledge regarding the extension of the cottonmouth's range west of longitude 98° is probably informed by the records along the Rio Grande reported in the nineteenth century.

Three extensions of the known range in Texas are reported herein. One specimen was captured by Mr. Harry Green (HWG 346) along the San Saba River, 8.1 miles west of Menard, Menard County. The other two specimens (KU 84375 and 84376) were taken by the late Paul Anderson one and one-half miles north of Pecan Crossing, South Concho River, Tom Green County, and one mile west of Mertzon, Irion County.

Three new findings of known species in Texas are reported here. One specimen was collected by Mr. Harry Green (HWG 346) along the San Saba River, 8.1 miles west of Menard in Menard County. The other two specimens (KU 84375 and 84376) were taken by the late Paul Anderson one and a half miles north of Pecan Crossing on the South Concho River in Tom Green County, and one mile west of Mertzon in Irion County.

In the hypsithermal period following Pleistocene glaciation, cottonmouths gradually moved northward occupying areas beyond their present range. The distributional records since the 1850's and the apparent relict populations now in existence indicate that the range of this species has since receded.

In the warm period after the Pleistocene ice age, cottonmouths slowly migrated to the north, settling in areas beyond where they live today. Records of their distribution since the 1850s and the existing small populations suggest that this species' range has since decreased.


DESCRIPTION

Color and Pattern

Color predominantly brown, ranging through pale reddish-brown or dark reddish-brown, brownish-green, to almost black; 10 to 17 irregular dark brown bands on paler brown ground color; young paler (some nearly salmon pink), retaining a vivid pattern throughout first year; pattern of most individuals nearly obliterated by third year; brilliance and dullness of predominant color correlated with molting cycle (skin especially bright and shiny immediately following shedding; tip of tail yellowish in juveniles; posterior part of venter and tail uniformly black in some adult individuals, especially females; secondary sexual differences in dorsal coloration, such as found in copperhead by Fitch (1960:102), not noted.

Color mostly brown, varying from light reddish-brown to dark reddish-brown, brownish-green, and nearly black; 10 to 17 irregular dark brown bands on a lighter brown background; young are lighter (some almost salmon pink), keeping a vibrant pattern during the first year; the pattern of most individuals is nearly gone by the third year; the brightness and dullness of the main color are linked to the molting cycle (skin is especially bright and shiny right after shedding; the tip of the tail is yellowish in juveniles; the back part of the belly and tail is uniformly black in some adult individuals, especially females; no secondary sexual differences in dorsal coloration, like those found in the copperhead by Fitch (1960:102), were observed.

The eastern subspecies, A. p. piscivorus, has the more brilliant pattern in which the centers of the dark cross-bands are invaded by the ground color. The cross-bands are slightly constricted in the mid-line and may or may not be bilaterally symmetrical. One-half of the cross-band may be displaced anteriorly or posteriorly to a slight degree or may even be completely absent. From one to several dark spots may be present within the cross-bands.

The eastern subspecies, A. p. piscivorus, has a more vivid pattern where the centers of the dark cross-bands blend into the background color. The cross-bands are a bit narrower in the middle and might not always be symmetrical on both sides. One side of the cross-band can be shifted slightly forward or backward, or it might even be completely missing. There can be one or more dark spots within the cross-bands.

The western subspecies, A. p. leucostoma, has a comparatively dull pattern in which the ground color does not invade the center of the cross-bands. In many instances the bands are outlined by white scales, as in the Mexican moccasin (this character is not so prominent in A. p. piscivorus because of the paler ground color). A large, dark blotch usually occurs at the base of the cross-band and may completely cross the ventral scales. The characteristic variations found in piscivorus are also present in leucostoma.

The western subspecies, A. p. leucostoma, has a relatively plain pattern where the base color doesn't extend into the middle of the cross-bands. Often, the bands are bordered by white scales, similar to the Mexican moccasin (this feature isn't as noticeable in A. p. piscivorus because of the lighter base color). A large, dark spot typically appears at the base of the cross-band and can completely cross the underside scales. The distinctive variations seen in piscivorus are also found in leucostoma.

The number of bands is often difficult to count because of the dark color of some specimens. Gloyd and Conant (1943:168) reported averages of 12.5 (11 to 16) and 12.2 (10 to 16) in males and females, respectively, of leucostoma and ranges of 10 to 17 for males and 10 to 16 for females with averages of 13 in both sexes of piscivorus. On 20 specimens of leucostoma from Texas the average number of bands was 12.7 (11 to 15). If the number of bands differed on the two sides of an animal, the total number of the two sides was divided by two.

The number of bands is often hard to count because of the dark color of some specimens. Gloyd and Conant (1943:168) reported averages of 12.5 (ranging from 11 to 16) for males and 12.2 (ranging from 10 to 16) for females of leucostoma, with ranges of 10 to 17 for males and 10 to 16 for females, and averages of 13 for both sexes of piscivorus. For 20 specimens of leucostoma from Texas, the average number of bands was 12.7 (ranging from 11 to 15). If the number of bands differed on either side of an animal, the total from both sides was divided by two.

Scutellation

The scutellation of the cottonmouth closely resembles that of the other species of Agkistrodon. For example, the nine cephalic shields are characteristic of most species of Agkistrodon, as well as most other primitive crotalids and viperids, and most colubrids. Most individuals have an additional pair of large scales behind the parietals.

The scale pattern of the cottonmouth is very similar to that of other species of Agkistrodon. For instance, the nine head shields are typical for most species of Agkistrodon, as well as for many other primitive crotalids, viperids, and most colubrids. Most individuals also have an extra pair of large scales located behind the parietals.

The numbers of postoculars, supralabials, and infralabials are variable. On either side the postoculars (three in most specimens) are reduced to two in some specimens. The supralabials (eight in most specimens) frequently vary (usually on one side only) from seven to nine. The number of infralabials is somewhat more variable than the number of supralabials, the usual number being 11, but 10 is also common; 8, 9, and 12 are more rare (Table 1). In 102 snakes in which these characters were examined, four different combinations of supralabials and seven combinations of infralabials were found. Both characters together yielded 16 combinations, considering only the actual number of scales and not taking into account the side of the head on which they occurred (Table 2). The combinations found in a brood of seven young from Houston, Texas, are shown in Table 3 to illustrate the variability of this character. Gloyd and Conant (1943:168) found a variation of 6 to 11 (8) and 7 to 9 (8) supralabials and 8 to 13 (11) and 8 to 12 (10.4) infralabials in samples of 301 leucostoma and 119 piscivorus, respectively (numbers in parentheses represent average). Also of interest is the variability of the scales themselves. In one instance a scale was found that had not completely divided. In another specimen the last supralabial and last infralabial were one scale that completely lined the angle of the jaw. Instances of one scale almost [445] crowding out another were common. In still other instances one or two supralabials were divided horizontally into two scales. Individual variation rather than geographical variation occurs in these characters.

The number of postoculars, supralabials, and infralabials varies. On each side, the postoculars (usually three in most specimens) can be reduced to two in some cases. The supralabials (typically eight in most specimens) often vary (usually on just one side) between seven and nine. The number of infralabials is somewhat more variable than the supralabials, with the usual count being 11, although 10 is also common; 8, 9, and 12 are rarer (Table 1). In a sample of 102 snakes where these features were examined, four different combinations of supralabials and seven combinations of infralabials were identified. Together, these characters resulted in 16 combinations, only counting the actual number of scales and not considering which side of the head they were on (Table 2). The combinations found in a brood of seven young from Houston, Texas, are shown in Table 3 to illustrate the variability of this characteristic. Gloyd and Conant (1943:168) noted a variation of 6 to 11 (average 8) and 7 to 9 (average 8) supralabials, along with 8 to 13 (average 11) and 8 to 12 (average 10.4) infralabials in samples of 301 leucostoma and 119 piscivorus, respectively (the numbers in parentheses represent averages). Another point of interest is the variability of the scales themselves. In one case, a scale was found that had not completely split. In another specimen, the last supralabial and the last infralabial were combined into one scale that fully lined the angle of the jaw. Cases of one scale nearly [445] pushing out another were common. In other instances, one or two supralabials were divided horizontally into two scales. The variation appears to be individual rather than geographical in these features.

 

TABLE 1.—Frequency of Occurrence of Various Numbers of Supralabial and
Infralabial Scales in 102 Cottonmouths.

TABLE 1.—Frequency of Occurrence of Various Numbers of Supralabial and
Infralabial Scales in 102 Cottonmouths.

Number of scales Specimens having number on both sides Specimens having number on one side Total Percentage
Supralabials
7 11 24 35 25.2
8 64 27 91 65.5
9 0 3 3 2.2
Infralabials
8 0 2 2 1.5
9 3 10 13 9.6
10 12 32 44 32.4
11 53 22 75 55.1
12 0 2 2 1.5

 

TABLE 2.—Numbers of Supralabials and Infralabials of 102 Cottonmouths.

TABLE 2.—Counts of Supralabials and Infralabials of 102 Cottonmouths.

Number of
individuals
Number of
supralabials
Number of
infralabials
37 8 11
15 8 10-11
12 7-8 11
6 7-8 10-11
5 8 10
5 8 9-10
4 7 11
3 7 9-10
3 7-8 10
2 7 9
2 7 10
2 8 10-12
2 8-9 10
2 7-8 8-9
1 7-8 9
1 8-9 10-11

The dorsal scales of cottonmouths are strongly keeled except that those of the two lower scale-rows on each side are weakly keeled. Also they are slightly larger than the others. Two apical pits are present on each dorsal scale. The shape of the scales and number of scale rows vary depending upon the position on the body. Scales on the neck are considerably smaller than those elsewhere on the body and are arranged in two or three more rows than those at mid-body. The skin in the region of the throat, neck, and fore-body is [446] especially elastic and allows the swallowing of large prey. Posteriorly from the mid-body the scales decrease in size and become more angular, those on the tail tending to be rhomboidal and wider than long. In the region of the anus the number of scale rows diminishes rapidly, leaving only 12 to 14 rows at the base of the tail and only three rows immediately ahead of the tail tip. The tail ends in a spine composed of two scales: one scale covers the bottom, lower parts of the sides, and tip of the spine; and a shorter dorsal scale covers the top and upper parts of the sides of the basal two-thirds of the spine. The spine of embryos and young cottonmouths is blunt, but is pointed in most adults.

The dorsal scales of cottonmouths are strongly ridged, except for the two lower scale rows on each side, which are only slightly ridged. They are also a bit larger than the other scales. Each dorsal scale has two tiny pits on it. The shape and number of scale rows change based on where they are on the body. Scales on the neck are considerably smaller than those on other parts of the body and have two or three more rows than those at the mid-body. The skin in the throat, neck, and fore-body area is [446] particularly stretchy, allowing the snake to swallow large prey. From mid-body towards the tail, the scales decrease in size and become more angular, with the tail scales being rhomboid and wider than they are long. The number of scale rows near the anus drops quickly, leaving only 12 to 14 rows at the base of the tail and just three rows right before the tail tip. The tail ends in a spine made of two scales: one scale covers the underside, lower sides, and tip of the spine, while a shorter dorsal scale covers the top and upper parts of the sides of the first two-thirds of the spine. The spine of embryos and young cottonmouths is blunt, but most adults have pointed spines.

 

TABLE 3.—Variation in Numbers of Supralabials and Infralabials in a Brood
of Seven Cottonmouths.

TABLE 3.—Variation in Numbers of Supralabials and Infralabials in a Litter
of Seven Cottonmouths.

Number of
individuals
Number of
supralabials
Number of
infralabials
1 7 9
1 7 9-10
2 7-8 8-9
1 7-8 9
1 8 9-10
1 8-9 10

 

TABLE 4.—Analysis of Number of Scale Rows at Three Parts of the Body
in 81 Cottonmouths.

TABLE 4.—Analysis of the Number of Scale Rows at Three Body Parts
in 81 Cottonmouths.

Number
of scales
per row
Neck Mid-body Anterior to anus
Number of
individuals
Percentage Number of
individuals
Percentage Number of
individuals
Percentage
29 1 1.2        
28 3 3.7        
27 52 64.2        
26 16 18.0 2 2.5    
25 8 9.9 67 82.7    
24 1 1.2 4 4.9    
23     8 9.9 4 4.9
22         4 4.9
21         68 84.0
20         5 6.2

The number of scale rows on the neck, at mid-body, and just anterior to the anus is relatively constant at 27-25-21, respectively; but some individual variation is evident (Table 4). Since the rows are diagonally arranged, it is necessary in counting scales to proceed either anteriorly or posteriorly across the back; or the row may be counted in either direction up to the center of the back and then reversed on the other side of the snake. In order to count the scale rows in a position where no scale reduction or addition was occurring and to avoid as much error as possible, I counted from anterior to center and back on the neck, in any direction at mid-body, and from posterior to center and back near the anus. Because females generally are the larger in circumference posteriorly, they could have more scale rows than males just anterior [447] to the anus. The few snakes having more than 21 scale rows in the posterior region offer no conclusive evidence as to tendencies, but in both instances in which this occurred the females outnumbered the males three to one. An odd, rather than an even, number of scale rows occurs on most of the length of the snakes examined, because there is a mid-dorsal row and scale rows tend to be lost on both sides at about the same level. An example of scale reduction of one snake was as follows:

The number of scale rows on the neck, mid-body, and just before the anus is usually consistent at 27-25-21, respectively; however, some individual variation is noticeable (Table 4). Since the rows are arranged diagonally, it's important to count scales either from the front or back across the snake's body; alternatively, you can count the rows in either direction up to the center of the back and then switch directions on the other side. To count the scale rows without any scale reduction or addition affecting the results and to minimize errors, I counted from the front to the center and back on the neck, in any direction at the mid-body, and from the back to the center and back near the anus. Because females are generally larger in diameter towards the back, they may have more scale rows than males just before [447] the anus. A few snakes with more than 21 scale rows in the back don’t provide definitive evidence of trends, but in both cases where this happened, females were three times more common than males. Most snakes examined have an odd number of scale rows along their bodies, as there is a single mid-dorsal row, and scale rows tend to be lost on both sides at roughly the same level. An example of scale reduction in one snake was as follows:

6 + 7 (13)   6 + 7 (96)    
27 ————— 25 ————— 24 ————— 23 ————— 22 —————
5 + 6 (13) 5 + 6 (90)   7 + 8 (111) 7 + 8 (114)
         
    6 + 7 (122)   + 7, -5 (125)
23 ————— 22 ————— 23 ————— 21 ————— 22 —————
-6 (118) + 6 (119) 6 + 7 (121) + 6 (123)  
         
-6 (126)  
22 ————— 21 (130).
   

This scale reduction follows the method proposed by Dowling (1951b: 133) in which the numbers on the mid-line represent the number of scale rows, upper figures refer to the right side of the snake, and figures in parentheses indicate the number of the ventral scale (counted from the anterior end of the series), thus marking the position of the addition or reduction. Addition of a row is shown by a plus sign and the number of the row, whereas reductions are shown by a minus sign and the number of the row that is lost or by a plus sign between the number of two rows that join. According to Dowling, variation in number of dorsal scales characterizes the few genera and species of snakes in which it has been studied. The time and difficulty involved in ascertaining the number of scales explain why it has not been widely used in classification.

This scale reduction follows the method proposed by Dowling (1951b: 133) in which the numbers on the mid-line indicate the number of scale rows, the upper figures refer to the right side of the snake, and the figures in parentheses show the number of the ventral scale (counted from the front of the series), thus marking the position of the addition or reduction. An added row is indicated by a plus sign and the row number, while reductions are marked by a minus sign and the number of the row that is lost or by a plus sign between the numbers of two rows that are merging. According to Dowling, the variation in the number of dorsal scales is a characteristic of the few genera and species of snakes that have been studied. The time and effort required to determine the number of scales explain why it hasn't been widely used in classification.

Fig. 2. Number of ventral scales in 48 female and 34 male A. p. leucostoma. Fig. 2. Number of ventral scales in 48 female and 34 male A. p. leucostoma.

Ventral scales on 34 males averaged 134.4 (128 to 139), and on 48 females 133.5 (128 to 137) (Fig. 2.). Barbour (1956:34) found an average of 135.3 ventral scales on 64 males and 44 females, and Gloyd and Conant (loc. cit.) found an average of 134 for both males and females. The average for the eastern cottonmouth obtained by Gloyd and Conant, however, was 137 ventrals in both sexes. Some of my counts were made before I knew of the standard system of counting ventrals proposed by Dowling (1951a:97-99), in which [448] the first ventral plate is defined as the most anterior one bordered on both sides by the first row of dorsals. Therefore, some inconsistencies may exist in my counts. Where differences occur, Dowling's method probably will indicate the presence of an additional scale, since it appears to begin farther anteriorly on the average, than I began counting.

The average number of ventral scales on 34 males was 134.4 (ranging from 128 to 139), and on 48 females, the average was 133.5 (ranging from 128 to 137) (Fig. 2.). Barbour (1956:34) reported an average of 135.3 ventral scales for 64 males and 44 females, while Gloyd and Conant (loc. cit.) found an average of 134 for both sexes. However, the average for eastern cottonmouths recorded by Gloyd and Conant was 137 ventrals in both sexes. Some of my counts were made before I learned about the standard method for counting ventrals suggested by Dowling (1951a:97-99), where [448] the first ventral plate is defined as the most anterior one, bordered on both sides by the first row of dorsals. Therefore, there may be some inconsistencies in my counts. Where differences occur, Dowling's method will likely indicate an extra scale, as it appears to start counting from a more anterior position on average than I did.

Fig. 3. Number of caudal scales in 44 female and 34 male A. p. leucostoma. Fig. 3. Count of tail scales in 44 female and 34 male A. p. leucostoma.

 

TABLE 5.—Caudal Scale Combinations in 95 Cottonmouths. U = Undivided;
D = Divided.

TABLE 5.—Caudal Scale Combinations in 95 Cottonmouths. U = Undivided;
D = Divided.

Number
of
samples

Number of samples

Number of scales
D U D U D U D U D U D U D U D U D
25   13-35 10-32                            
11 1-2 12-33 14-28                            
20   16-39 1-9 1-3 3-24                        
20 1-4 3-37 1-21 1-5 1-29                        
4   14-30 1-8 1-7 1-8 1-4 2-10                    
3 1 18-23 1-2 1-2 6-11 1-3 6-9                    
4   1-17 1 1-3 1-8 1-4 1-3 1-4 13-22                
2 1-2 4-16 1 1-4 2 1 1-4 1 18-21                
1   20 1 1 1 1 6 1 3 1 11            
1   10 2 3 2 10 1 2 2 1 4 4          
1   20 1 1 2 1 1 4 4 2 4 1 3        
1 1 13 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 4 2 4 13        
1   17 1 1 2 1 1 6 2 1 2 3 2 7      
1   9 1 1 8 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 6

Analysis of caudal scales revealed sexual dimorphism. In the six specimens from Tennessee, Blanchard (1922:16) found the same thing. Caudals averaged 45.4 (41 to 50) on 34 males and 42.6 (39 to 49) on 44 females (Fig. 3). Barbour (loc. cit.) found an average of 45.7 (30 to 54) caudals in males and 43 (17 to 56) in females. Caudal scale counts by Gloyd and Conant (loc. cit.) averaged 44 (38 to 49) in males and 42 (37 to 48) in females of leucostoma; in piscivorus they averaged 48 (42 to 53) in males and 44 (41 to 49) in females. Another seldom-mentioned, unusual characteristic of the caudal [449] scales of copperheads and cottonmouths is that some are single (usually those at the base of the tail) and others divided (Table 5). To my knowledge, all other species have either single or divided scales the entire length of the tail. See Klauber (1941:73) and Fox (1948:252) concerning correlation of few scales with warm environment.

Analysis of the tail scales showed sexual dimorphism. In the six specimens from Tennessee, Blanchard (1922:16) found the same results. Males averaged 45.4 scales (ranging from 41 to 50) based on 34 individuals, while females averaged 42.6 scales (ranging from 39 to 49) based on 44 individuals (Fig. 3). Barbour (loc. cit.) found that males averaged 45.7 scales (ranging from 30 to 54) and females averaged 43 scales (ranging from 17 to 56). Gloyd and Conant (loc. cit.) reported an average of 44 scales (ranging from 38 to 49) in males and 42 scales (ranging from 37 to 48) in females of leucostoma; in piscivorus, the averages were 48 scales (ranging from 42 to 53) in males and 44 scales (ranging from 41 to 49) in females. Another rarely mentioned, unique feature of the tail scales of copperheads and cottonmouths is that some are single (usually those at the base of the tail) while others are divided (Table 5). As far as I know, all other species have either single or divided scales along the entire length of the tail. Refer to Klauber (1941:73) and Fox (1948:252) regarding the correlation between fewer scales and warmer environments.

Dentition

Cottonmouths, like other pit-vipers, have their teeth reduced in number and have enlarged, highly specialized fangs. Small teeth occur on the palatine and the pterygoid in the upper jaw and on the dentary in the lower jaw. The dentary bone bears 17 curved teeth that decrease in size posteriorly. The palatine bears five small, strongly curved teeth, and the pterygoid bears 16 to 18 strongly curved teeth decreasing in size posteriorly. The numbers of teeth mentioned above in each instance refer to the number of sockets rather than the actual number of teeth, because teeth are frequently shed, leaving some of the sockets empty at any one time.

Cottonmouths, like other pit vipers, have fewer teeth and have larger, specialized fangs. Small teeth are found on the palatine and pterygoid in the upper jaw, as well as on the dentary in the lower jaw. The dentary has 17 curved teeth that get smaller toward the back. The palatine has five small, strongly curved teeth, and the pterygoid has 16 to 18 strongly curved teeth that also decrease in size toward the back. The numbers of teeth mentioned refer to the number of sockets rather than the actual number of teeth, since teeth are often shed, leaving some sockets empty at any given time.

The maxillary bone has two sockets side by side which bear the poison fangs, usually one at a time. During the period shortly before a fang is to be shed, however, its replacement becomes attached in the alternate socket; and both fangs may be functional for a short time. The old fang then becomes weakened at its base, eventually breaks off, and is swallowed. At any one time four or five replacement fangs in various stages of development are found in the gum behind the functional fang. These replacement fangs, which are arranged in alternate rows, gradually enlarge as they move forward in their development and, in juveniles, are generally slightly longer than the fangs that they replace.

The maxillary bone has two sockets next to each other that hold the venom fangs, usually one at a time. However, just before a fang is about to be replaced, its new counterpart attaches in the other socket, allowing both fangs to function for a short period. The old fang then weakens at its base, eventually breaks off, and is swallowed. At any given time, four or five replacement fangs in various stages of growth can be found in the gum behind the active fang. These replacement fangs are arranged in alternating rows and gradually grow larger as they move forward in development, and in younger individuals, they are generally a bit longer than the fangs they replace.

In 1963 I examined the fangs of 14 cottonmouths at four- to seven-day intervals for a period of six weeks. The fang-shedding cycle was found to be highly irregular, with a double condition (on one or both sides) occurring one-third of the time. Approximately the same proportion of double fangs was found in preserved individuals. A replacement period of at least five days was observed in one snake. One-half the cycle (from replacement on one side to replacement on the other) varied from five to twenty days, indicating that the cycles for each fang are independent of one another. Bogert (1943:324) found that young rattlesnakes are born with functional fangs in the two inner sockets. Nonsynchronous use of the sockets on opposite sides of the head in rattlesnakes is a later development which results from accidents or other conditions leading to a longer retention of the fang on one side than on the other (Klauber, 1956:723). I found a double set of fangs in cottonmouths only twice in the six-week period. A complete cycle was recorded in ten instances in a period of 19 to 23 days and in two instances in 32 days. One cottonmouth was examined periodically over a 34-day period by Allen and Swindell (1948:12), but a complete fang-shedding cycle was not observed. Fitch (1960:110) reported a 33-day cycle in copperheads; Klauber (1956:726) estimated the normal active life of each fang of an adult rattlesnake to be from six to ten weeks, but he made no observations to confirm his estimation.

In 1963, I looked at the fangs of 14 cottonmouths every four to seven days for six weeks. The fang-shedding cycle was very irregular, with a double condition (on one or both sides) occurring about one-third of the time. A similar proportion of double fangs was found in preserved specimens. One snake showed a replacement period of at least five days. The half-cycle (from replacement on one side to replacement on the other) ranged from five to twenty days, suggesting that the cycles for each fang are independent. Bogert (1943:324) noted that young rattlesnakes are born with functional fangs in the two inner sockets. The nonsynchronous use of the sockets on opposite sides of the head in rattlesnakes develops later, resulting from accidents or conditions that lead to a longer retention of the fang on one side than the other (Klauber, 1956:723). I observed a double set of fangs in cottonmouths only twice during the six-week period. A complete cycle was recorded ten times over 19 to 23 days and twice in 32 days. One cottonmouth was studied periodically over 34 days by Allen and Swindell (1948:12), but a complete fang-shedding cycle wasn’t observed. Fitch (1960:110) reported a 33-day cycle in copperheads; Klauber (1956:726) estimated that the normal active lifespan of each fang in an adult rattlesnake is six to ten weeks, though he did not confirm this estimation with observations.

Fangs measured from the tip of the notch of the basal lumen to the end of the fang vary from about 1.3 per cent of the snout-vent length in juveniles to about 1.0 per cent in large adults (Table 6). The fangs are longer than those of copperheads (Fitch, 1960:111). Klauber's (1956:736) figures on fang-lengths in all species of rattlesnakes are percentages of total length rather than of the snout-vent length. The fangs of various species of rattlesnakes range from nearly the same proportionate length as those of cottonmouths to some much longer.

Fangs measured from the tip of the notch of the basal lumen to the end of the fang range from about 1.3 percent of the body length in juveniles to about 1.0 percent in large adults (Table 6). The fangs are longer than those of copperheads (Fitch, 1960:111). Klauber's (1956:736) statistics on fang lengths in all species of rattlesnakes are percentages of total length instead of the body length. The fangs of different species of rattlesnakes range from almost the same proportionate length as those of cottonmouths to some that are much longer.

From patterns of bites of venomous snakes, Pope and Perkins (1944:333-335) attempted to correlate number, size, and patterns of tooth marks with size and generic identity of the snake responsible for the bite. Distance between fangs is relatively constant for snakes of a particular size (Table 6) regardless of genus, but the fangs of a cottonmouth are directed outward to variable degrees, and puncture wounds could easily resemble those of a much larger snake (Table 7). Also there is no direct relationship between size of [450] snake and toxicity or amount of venom injected. Consequently information of this kind is of little or no value from a medical standpoint.

From the bite patterns of venomous snakes, Pope and Perkins (1944:333-335) tried to link the number, size, and patterns of tooth marks with the size and species of the snake that caused the bite. The distance between fangs is fairly consistent for snakes of a specific size (Table 6) regardless of their genus, but the fangs of a cottonmouth can angle outward to varying degrees, making puncture wounds look similar to those from a much larger snake (Table 7). Additionally, there isn't a direct connection between the size of the snake and its toxicity or the amount of venom it injects. Therefore, this kind of information is not very useful from a medical perspective.

 

TABLE 6.—Correlation of Relative Fang-length and Distance Between Fangs
at Base with Snout-vent Length of Cottonmouths.

TABLE 6.—Correlation of Relative Fang Length and Distance Between Fangs
at the Base with Snout-vent Length of Cottonmouths.

Snout-vent length
(millimeters)  

Number in
sample

Number in sample

Average
ratio of
fang-length
to
snout-vent
length
(percent)

Average fang-to-snout ratio (%)

Number
in sample

Number in sample

 

Average
ratio of
distance
between
fangs to
snout-vent
length
(percent)
200-299 3 1.33 3 2.57
300-399 7 1.30 5 2.48
400-499 13 1.21 9 2.21
500-599 12 1.22 8 2.19
600-699 7 1.17 1 2.10
700-799 5 1.07 4 1.65
800-899 1 1.00 1 2.00

 

TABLE 7.—Contrast in Measurements Between the Base of the Fangs and
Between Fang Punctures of Nine Cottonmouths (in millimeters).

TABLE 7.—Difference in Measurements Between the Base of the Fangs and
Between Fang Punctures of Nine Cottonmouths (in millimeters).

Distance between
base of fangs
Distance between
fang punctures
Snout-vent
length
7.7 13.0 400
8.7 14.0 575
10.0 22.5 526
11.0 18.0-19.0 590
12.0 18.0 793
13.0 17.0, 20.0 558, 612
15.5 23.5 800
16.0 24.0 800

HABITAT AND LIMITING FACTORS

Although usually associated with swamps and lowlands along river bottoms, the cottonmouth lives in a variety of habitats ranging from salt marshes to cool, clear streams and from sea level to an altitude of 2300 feet. Shaded, moist areas either in or beside shallow waters are preferred, but cottonmouths occasionally wander as far as a mile from water.

Although typically linked to swamps and lowlands by riverbanks, the cottonmouth can be found in various environments, from salt marshes to cool, clear streams, and from sea level up to 2,300 feet in elevation. They prefer shaded, moist areas either in or next to shallow water, but cottonmouths sometimes travel as far as a mile away from water.

In the pine-oak forests of Nacogdoches County in eastern Texas cottonmouths and copperheads are probably the most abundant species of snakes. Specimens have been collected near Nacogdoches in ponds, swamps, clear and fast-running streams with rock bottoms, and sluggish muddy streams. On the Stephen F. Austin Experimental Forest numerous cottonmouths live in a swamp until around mid-July, when it becomes dry. A small stream west of [451] the swamp seems to be used as a migration route to and from the swamp. Slightly more than a mile downstream cottonmouths are common in a bottomland area. The ground is always moist and no undergrowth occurs; a few small clear springs produce shallow trickles that run into a swamp. Cottonmouths can often be found here, lying in or beside the small trickles.

In the pine-oak forests of Nacogdoches County in eastern Texas, cottonmouths and copperheads are probably the most common snake species. They've been found near Nacogdoches in ponds, swamps, clear and fast-running streams with rocky bottoms, and slow, muddy streams. At the Stephen F. Austin Experimental Forest, many cottonmouths live in a swamp until around mid-July when it dries out. A small stream west of [451] the swamp seems to serve as a migration route in and out of the swamp. Just over a mile downstream, cottonmouths are often found in a lowland area where the ground stays moist and there’s no undergrowth; a few small clear springs create shallow streams that flow into the swamp. Cottonmouths can often be seen here, resting in or beside the small streams.

I have seen cottonmouths in various types of aquatic habitats in Brazoria County. In most places in this area, cottonmouths are found in association with one or more species of water-snakes (including Natrix cyclopion, N. erythrogaster, N. rhombifera, and N. confluens), which greatly outnumber the cottonmouth. Interspecific competition may be reduced somewhat by cottonmouths sometimes feeding on water-snakes.

I have seen cottonmouths in different aquatic environments in Brazoria County. In many spots in this area, cottonmouths are found alongside one or more species of water snakes (including Natrix cyclopion, N. erythrogaster, N. rhombifera, and N. confluens), which greatly outnumber the cottonmouth. Competition between species may be somewhat reduced because cottonmouths sometimes eat water snakes.

The numerous statements in the literature concerning the habitat of the cottonmouth can be summarized most easily by the following short quotations:

The various statements in the literature about the habitat of the cottonmouth can be summed up most simply by the following brief quotations:

Agkistrodon piscivorus piscivorus—"Marshes and lakes; ponds and streams with wooded shores; low country near water; roadside ponds; drainage ditches; coastal 'banks'; keys; some Gulf coast islands; mangrove swamps." (Wright and Wright, 1957:919.)

Agkistrodon piscivorus piscivorus—"Marshes and lakes; ponds and streams with forested edges; low-lying areas near water; roadside ponds; drainage ditches; coastal banks; keys; some Gulf Coast islands; mangrove swamps." (Wright and Wright, 1957:919.)

Agkistrodon piscivorus leucostoma—"Cypress, gum, river swamps; alluvial swamps wooded or not wooded; water courses of the south such as rivers, bayous, backwaters of small branches; hill streams in the north; ... marshy places in prairies ... rice fields, bottomland pools; margins of above habitats, pools, shallow lakes, swampy places, temporary flood lands. ... In, under, or on fallen timber, in holes in banks, rocky bluffs, crayfish burrows. In short it is very aquatic." (Wright and Wright, op. cit.:923.)

Agkistrodon piscivorus leucostoma—"Cypress swamps, gum swamps, river swamps; alluvial swamps, whether wooded or not; waterways in the southern regions like rivers, bayous, and backwaters of small streams; hill streams in the north; marshy areas in prairies; rice fields, lowland pools; edges of all these habitats, pools, shallow lakes, swampy areas, and temporary flood zones. ... Found in, under, or on fallen logs, in bank holes, rocky cliffs, and crayfish burrows. In short, it is very much an aquatic species." (Wright and Wright, op. cit.:923.)

Geographically cottonmouths differ somewhat in their ecological requirements, but are basically much alike in most respects. The areas of greatest abundance are those having 40 inches or more of annual rainfall. The northern edge of the range has a mean temperature of approximately 38° F. in January in Virginia and 30° F. in Missouri, although the lowest temperature reached in these areas is more important as a limiting factor. The annual rainfall in both Virginia and Missouri amounts to approximately 40 inches. Moisture, as well as temperature, may play an important role in the northward distribution of the species. The eastern cottonmouth seems to be less tolerant of low temperatures than the western subspecies. Mean January temperatures equal to those along the northern limits of the western cottonmouth's distribution are reached in the vicinity of Connecticut, which is north of the geographic range of the eastern subspecies.

Cottonmouths vary a bit in their ecological needs based on location, but they are generally similar in most ways. They are most commonly found in areas with 40 inches or more of annual rainfall. The northern limits of their range have an average January temperature of about 38° F. in Virginia and 30° F. in Missouri, though the lowest temperatures in these regions are more crucial as a limiting factor. The annual rainfall in Virginia and Missouri is roughly 40 inches. Both moisture levels and temperature may significantly influence where the species can thrive as they move north. The eastern cottonmouth appears to be less tolerant of colder temperatures compared to the western subspecies. January temperatures similar to those at the northern edge of the western cottonmouth's range can be found around Connecticut, which lies north of where the eastern subspecies is found.

The depths to which cottonmouths penetrate into their dens may have a limiting influence upon the geographic range, especially in the northern extremes. Bailey (1948:215) discussed the possibility that populations of snakes may be significantly depressed because of winter kill of individuals that "hibernate" at shallow depths. He speculated also that the short growing season does not allow enough time for the essentials of existence to be carried out, and the prolonged period of inactivity overtaxes the energy reserve of the species.

The depth that cottonmouths burrow into their dens might limit their geographic range, especially in the northern areas. Bailey (1948:215) talked about how snake populations could be significantly reduced because of winter deaths among individuals that "hibernate" at shallow depths. He also suggested that the short growing season doesn't provide enough time for the necessary activities to take place, and the long period of inactivity drains the species' energy reserves.

Available food does not seem to be of much importance as a limiting factor, for the cottonmouth is remarkably indiscriminate in its choice of prey, feeding upon almost any vertebrate animal that happens to come within reach. Competition for food, however, may play an important role.

Available food doesn't seem to be a significant limiting factor, as the cottonmouth is quite indiscriminate in its choice of prey, feeding on almost any vertebrate animal that comes within reach. However, competition for food may be an important factor.


REPRODUCTION

Courtship and Mating

A review of available literature indicates no records of courtship of the cottonmouth other than statements that breeding occurs in early spring. In a close relative, the copperhead (see Fitch, 1960:159-160), mating occurs almost any time in the season of activity but is mainly concentrated in the few weeks after spring emergence, at about the time when females are ovulating. Klauber (1956:692) concluded that along the southern border of the United States rattlesnakes normally mate in spring soon after coming out of their winter retreats; but farther north where broods are produced biennially, the mating times may be more widely dispersed, and summer and fall matings may even predominate.

A review of the available literature shows that there are no records of how cottonmouths court each other, except that breeding happens in early spring. In a closely related species, the copperhead (see Fitch, 1960:159-160), mating can occur at almost any time during the active season but is mostly focused in the weeks following spring emergence, around the time females are ovulating. Klauber (1956:692) found that on the southern border of the United States, rattlesnakes usually mate in spring shortly after coming out of their winter dens; however, further north, where broods are produced every other year, mating periods may be more spread out, with summer and fall matings potentially being more common.

The only record of copulation in the cottonmouth was reported by Allen and Swindell (1948:11), who observed a pair copulating for three hours on October 19, 1946, at the Ross Allen Reptile Institute. Davis (1936:267-268) stated that courtship in cottonmouths is violent and prolonged but did not note any nervous, jerky motions or nudging of the female along her back and sides as had been observed in other genera of snakes. Carr (1936:90) saw a male cottonmouth seize a female in his mouth and hold her, but no courtship followed.

The only documented instance of copulation in the cottonmouth was reported by Allen and Swindell (1948:11), who saw a pair mating for three hours on October 19, 1946, at the Ross Allen Reptile Institute. Davis (1936:267-268) mentioned that courtship in cottonmouths is aggressive and lengthy but didn’t observe any nervous, jerky movements or nudging of the female along her back and sides, as seen in other snake genera. Carr (1936:90) witnessed a male cottonmouth grab a female in his mouth and hold her, but no courtship occurred afterward.

Reproductive Cycles

Many persons have assumed that gestation periods in snakes are the intervals between mating and parturition, and that mating and ovulation occur at approximately the same time. However, retention of spermatozoa and delayed fertilization indicate that copulation is not a stimulus for ovulation.

Many people have assumed that gestation periods in snakes are the time between mating and giving birth, and that mating and ovulation happen at about the same time. However, the retention of sperm and delayed fertilization show that copulation is not a trigger for ovulation.

A biennial reproductive cycle was found for the copperhead in Kansas (Fitch, 1960:162), the prairie rattler in Wyoming (Rahn, 1942:239) and in South Dakota (Klauber, 1956:688), the great basin rattler in Utah (Glissmeyer, 1951:24), and the western diamondback rattler in northwestern Texas (Tinkle, 1962:309). Klauber's (1956:687) belief that the reproductive cycle of rattlesnakes varies with climate, being biennial in the north and annual in the south, is supported by similar climatic variation in the reproductive cycle of the European viper which was discussed by Volsøe (1944:18, 149).

A two-year reproductive cycle was observed for the copperhead in Kansas (Fitch, 1960:162), the prairie rattler in Wyoming (Rahn, 1942:239) and in South Dakota (Klauber, 1956:688), the great basin rattler in Utah (Glissmeyer, 1951:24), and the western diamondback rattler in northwestern Texas (Tinkle, 1962:309). Klauber’s (1956:687) idea that the reproductive cycle of rattlesnakes changes with climate, being two-year in the north and yearly in the south, is backed by similar climate-related variations in the reproductive cycle of the European viper, as discussed by Volsøe (1944:18, 149).

If data for a large number of females were arranged as are those in Table 8, they might reveal whether the breeding cycle is annual or biennial. The figures presented in Table 8 are misleading if viewed separately because of the small number of individuals included in some of the size classes.

If data for a large number of females were organized like those in Table 8, they could show whether the breeding cycle is annual or biennial. The figures in Table 8 can be misleading if looked at individually because of the small number of individuals in some of the size categories.

The smallest reproductive female found measured 455 millimeters in snout-vent length. Conant (1933:43) reported that a female raised in captivity gave birth to two young at an age of two years and ten months. The size classes represented by gravid females found by Barbour (1956:38) in Kentucky indicate that breeding occurs at least by the third year.

The smallest reproductive female measured 455 millimeters from snout to vent. Conant (1933:43) reported that a female raised in captivity gave birth to two young at the age of two years and ten months. The size categories of pregnant females found by Barbour (1956:38) in Kentucky suggest that breeding occurs at least by the third year.

The ovaries of female cottonmouths examined revealed ova in various stages of development. In individuals less than 300 millimeters in snout-vent length the ovaries are almost completely undeveloped; in immature individuals from 300 to 450 millimeters in length the follicles are from one to two millimeters in length; in post-post females follicles vary in size, the largest being about seven millimeters. Reproductive females also contain follicles of various sizes. [453] One or two sets are less than three millimeters in length, and large ova that soon are to be ovulated are present. Ovarian ova found in April ranged in length from 23 to 35 millimeters. No embryonic development was observed in most individuals until June or later.

The ovaries of female cottonmouths that were examined showed eggs at different stages of development. In individuals shorter than 300 millimeters in snout-vent length, the ovaries are nearly fully undeveloped; in immature individuals measuring between 300 and 450 millimeters, the follicles are about one to two millimeters long; in reproductive females, the follicles vary in size, with the largest being around seven millimeters. Reproductive females also have follicles of different sizes. [453] One or two sets are smaller than three millimeters, and larger eggs that are about to be ovulated are present. Ovarian eggs found in April measured between 23 and 35 millimeters in length. No embryonic development was observed in most individuals until June or later.

 

TABLE 8.—Percentage of Gravid Females of A. p. leucostoma in 50 Millimeter Size Classes.

TABLE 8.—Percentage of Pregnant Females of A. p. leucostoma in 50 Millimeter Size Classes.

Snout-vent
length
Number of
gravid females
Total number
in size class
Percentage
gravid
450-499 3 14 21.4
500-549 7 17 41.2
550-599 8 17 47.1
600-649 5 7 71.4
650-699 2 9 22.2
700-749 2 3 66.7
750-799 1 1 100.0
850-899 1 1 100.0
Totals 29 69 42.0

Increase in length of testes appears to be correlated with length of the individual rather than cyclic reproductive periods (Fig. 4).

The increase in testicle size seems to be linked to the overall length of the individual rather than to the cyclical reproductive periods (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. Length of testes in cottonmouths of various sizes Fig. 4. Testes length in cottonmouths of different sizes
( ·—left;
°The right testis is always longer than the left.

The reproductive cycle in cottonmouths resembles that illustrated by Rahn (op. cit.:237), in which the ovarian follicles of post-partum females begin to enlarge in late summer and autumn, with ovulation occurring the following spring. By means of retaining sperm successive broods possibly are produced after only one mating. In captivity, at least, some females may not follow this biennial cycle; Stanley Roth (M.S.), biology teacher in high school at Lawrence, Kansas, had a female of A. p. piscivorus, from Florida, that produced broods of 14 and 12 young in two consecutive years.

The reproductive cycle in cottonmouths is similar to what Rahn described (op. cit.:237), where post-partum females' ovarian follicles start to grow in late summer and fall, with ovulation happening the next spring. By storing sperm, these snakes might produce multiple broods after just one mating. In captivity, some females, at least, might not stick to this two-year cycle; Stanley Roth (M.S.), a high school biology teacher in Lawrence, Kansas, had a female A. p. piscivorus from Florida that had broods of 14 and 12 young in two consecutive years.

Embryonic Development

After ova are fertilized a three and one-half to four-month period of development begins which varies somewhat depending on the temperature. In almost every instance the ova in the right uterus outnumber those in the left. Embryos usually assume the serpentine form in the latter part of June and are coiled in a counterclockwise spiral with the head on the outside of the coil. At this time the head is relatively large and birdlike in appearance with conspicuous protruding eyes. Sex is easily noted because the hemipenes of males are everted. By late July scales are well developed and the embryo is more snakelike in appearance, but pigmentation is still absent. By mid-August the color and pattern are well developed, the egg tooth is present, the snake shows a considerable increase in size over that of the previous month, and much of the yolk has been consumed. Some females that contain well developed embryos also contain eggs that fail to develop. Sizes of ova vary irrespective of size of female and stage of embryonic development. Lengths of ova ranged from 22 to 51 millimeters in May to 35 to 49 millimeters in July and August. A two-yolked egg was found in one female.

After the eggs are fertilized, a development period of about three and a half to four months begins, which can vary slightly depending on the temperature. In almost every case, the eggs in the right uterus outnumber those in the left. The embryos usually take on a serpentine shape by late June and are coiled in a counterclockwise spiral with their heads on the outside of the coil. At this stage, the head appears relatively large and birdlike, with prominent eyes. It’s easy to tell the sex because the male’s hemipenes are everted. By late July, the scales are well-developed, and the embryo looks more like a snake, although there is still no pigmentation. By mid-August, the color and pattern are fully developed, the egg tooth is present, the snake has significantly increased in size compared to the previous month, and much of the yolk has been consumed. Some females with well-developed embryos also have eggs that don’t develop. The sizes of eggs vary regardless of the female’s size and the stage of embryonic development. The lengths of the eggs ranged from 22 to 51 millimeters in May, and from 35 to 49 millimeters in July and August. One female was found to have a two-yolked egg.

Birth of Young

Accounts in the literature of 15 litters of cottonmouths fix the time of birth as August and September. Conant (1933:43) reported the birth of a litter in mid-July by a female that had been raised in captivity, and one female that I had kept in captivity for two months gave birth to a litter between October 19 and October 25. The conditions of captivity undoubtedly affected the time of birth in both instances.

Accounts in the literature about 15 litters of cottonmouths indicate that they are usually born in August and September. Conant (1933:43) reported a litter being born in mid-July from a female raised in captivity, and one female I had kept in captivity for two months gave birth to a litter between October 19 and October 25. The conditions of captivity likely influenced the timing of birth in both cases.

Wharton (1960:125-126) reported the birth and behavior of a brood of seven cottonmouths in Florida. I was given notes of a similar nature by Richard S. Funk of Junction City, Kansas, on a brood of five cottonmouths. The mother of the brood was caught in June, 1962, in Tarrant County, Texas, by Richard E. Smith, and was 705 millimeters in snout-vent length. The first young was found dead in an extended position a few inches from the fetal membranes at 11:05 p.m. on August 22. The second young was born at 11:07 p.m. The intervals between the successive births were three, seven, and four minutes; and time until the sac was ruptured in each instance was six, five, eight, and 11 minutes. The time interval between the rupture of the sac and emergence of each individual was 41, 92, 154, and 34 minutes. The mother's actions in giving birth to the last four young were essentially as described by Wharton (loc. cit.), except that the intervals between successive births did not increase. Within one minute after rupturing the sac and while its head was protruding, each of the four living young opened its mouth widely from three to seven times, then took its first breath. Breaths for the first three hours were steady at three or four per minute but then decreased to two or three per minute. Pulse rate for the four averaged 38 per minute while at rest but increased to 44 per minute after voluntarily crawling.

Wharton (1960:125-126) reported on the birth and behavior of a group of seven cottonmouths in Florida. I received similar observations from Richard S. Funk of Junction City, Kansas, regarding a group of five cottonmouths. The mother of this group was caught in June 1962 in Tarrant County, Texas, by Richard E. Smith, and measured 705 millimeters in snout-vent length. The first young was found dead in an extended position just a few inches from the fetal membranes at 11:05 p.m. on August 22. The second young was born at 11:07 p.m. The intervals between the successive births were three, seven, and four minutes, and the time until the sac ruptured in each case was six, five, eight, and 11 minutes. The time between the rupture of the sac and the emergence of each individual was 41, 92, 154, and 34 minutes. The mother's actions during the birth of the last four young were largely as described by Wharton (loc. cit.), except that the intervals between successive births did not increase. Within one minute after the sac ruptured and while its head was protruding, each of the four living young opened its mouth widely from three to seven times before taking its first breath. For the first three hours, breaths were steady at three or four per minute but then decreased to two or three per minute. The average resting pulse rate for the four was 38 per minute but increased to 44 per minute after they voluntarily crawled.

Number of Young per Litter

Records of from one to 16 young per litter have been reported (Ditmars, 1945:330; Clark, 1949:259), but the average is probably between six or seven. Most accounts in the literature present information on number of ova or embryos [455] per female rather than the number of young. Size and age of the mother (Table 9) influence the number of ova produced. Allen and Swindell (1948:11) recorded three to 12 embryos in 31 cottonmouths varying in total length from 26 to 44 inches. An average of 6.5 embryos per female was found.

Records of between one and 16 young per litter have been reported (Ditmars, 1945:330; Clark, 1949:259), but the average is probably around six or seven. Most literature focuses on the number of ova or embryos [455] per female instead of the number of young. The size and age of the mother (Table 9) affect the number of ova produced. Allen and Swindell (1948:11) documented three to 12 embryos in 31 cottonmouths, which ranged in total length from 26 to 44 inches. An average of 6.5 embryos per female was found.

 

TABLE 9.—Number of Ova Produced by Fecund Cottonmouths.

TABLE 9.—Number of Eggs Produced by Fertile Cottonmouths.

Snout-vent length
in millimeters
Number
in sample
Number of ova,
average and extremes
450-549 10 4.1 (2 to 7)
550-649 11 4.9 (1 to 8)
650-749 4 6.3 (4 to 8)
750-849 1 5
850-949 1 14

Mortality at birth has been recorded for almost every litter born in captivity (see Allen and Swindell, loc. cit.; Conant, 1933:43; Wharton, 1960:125). A female that I kept in captivity gave birth to seven young. Three never ruptured their sacs, and another died soon after leaving the sac. The effects of captivity on females may result in higher rates of deformity and mortality in young than is common in nature. Klauber (1956:699-700) estimated that the defects brought about by conditions of captivity on rattlesnakes eliminate about three young per litter.

Mortality at birth has been documented for nearly every litter born in captivity (see Allen and Swindell, loc. cit.; Conant, 1933:43; Wharton, 1960:125). A female I kept in captivity gave birth to seven babies. Three of them never broke free from their sacs, and another died shortly after leaving the sac. The impact of captivity on females may lead to higher rates of deformities and mortality in their young than what’s typically seen in the wild. Klauber (1956:699-700) estimated that the defects caused by captivity conditions in rattlesnakes result in the loss of about three young per litter.

Population Composition

No investigator has yet analyzed the composition of a population of cottonmouths according to age, sex and snout-vent length. Barbour (1956:35) did sort 167 snakes into size classes, but did not determine sex ratio, size at sexual maturity, reproductive cycles, or snout-vent length. He recorded total lengths from which snout-vent lengths cannot be computed because of differential growth rates and different bodily proportions of the two sexes. I judge from my findings that he included immature individuals in his three smallest size classes (45.5 per cent of the population). I found at least 32.5 per cent immature individuals (Fig. 5) in my material, but it was not a natural population.

No researcher has analyzed the makeup of a cottonmouth population based on age, sex, and snout-vent length. Barbour (1956:35) did categorize 167 snakes into size classes but didn’t evaluate the sex ratio, size at sexual maturity, reproductive cycles, or snout-vent length. He recorded total lengths, which can't be used to calculate snout-vent lengths due to different growth rates and body proportions in the two sexes. From my findings, I believe he included immature individuals in his three smallest size classes (45.5 percent of the population). I identified at least 32.5 percent immature individuals (Fig. 5) in my data, but it wasn’t a natural population.

The sex ratios of several small collections from natural populations varied, and no conclusions could be drawn. Females comprised 53 per cent of the specimens included in Fig. 5 and in a group of 48 embryos which represented eight broods. That percentage may not be the percentage in a natural population but is used in making assumptions because I lack better information.

The sex ratios of various small samples from natural populations differed, so no conclusions could be made. Females made up 53 percent of the specimens shown in Fig. 5 and in a group of 48 embryos that represented eight broods. That percentage might not reflect the ratio in a natural population, but it’s what I’m relying on to make assumptions since I don't have better information.

Reproductive Potential

If data in Fig. 5 are representative of a natural population and if 61 per cent of the females are sexually mature, the reproductive potential can be estimated as follows: assuming a cohort of 1000 cottonmouths contains 530 females, 61 per cent of the females (323 individuals) probably are adults. If 42 per cent of these females produce 6.5 young per female in any season (Tables 8 and 9), 136 females will produce 884 young. But if 50 per cent [456] of the adult females are reproductive (as would be assumed if reproduction is biennial), 1050 young will be produced. Actually the number of young required per year to sustain a population is unknown, because mortality rates at any age are unknown.

If the data in Fig. 5 reflect a natural population and 61 percent of the females are sexually mature, we can estimate the reproductive potential like this: if a group of 1000 cottonmouths includes 530 females, then about 61 percent of those females (which is 323 individuals) are likely adults. If 42 percent of these females give birth to an average of 6.5 young per female each season (see Tables 8 and 9), then 136 females would produce 884 young. However, if 50 percent [456] of the adult females are reproductive (which would be the case if they reproduce every two years), then 1050 young would be born. The actual number of young needed each year to maintain the population is unknown, as mortality rates at any age are also unknown.

Fig. 5. Composition of a group of cottonmouths Fig. 5. Composition of a group of cottonmouths studied in this research. Individuals under 450 millimeters in snout-vent length are classified as immature. Specimens measuring 200 to 249 millimeters long are categorized in the 200-millimeter class, etc.

GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

Size at Birth and Early Growth

Size at birth depends on the health of the mother. According to Fitch (1960:182), many litters of copperheads born in captivity are stunted. Seven young cottonmouths (two males and five females) born in captivity were each 185 millimeters in snout-vent length and 40 millimeters in tail length. Weights of the three living young were 10.0, 10.1, and 11.1 grams. Another litter of five young measured by Richard S. Funk were larger, and differences in the proportions of the tail length and snout-vent length suggest the sexual dimorphism found in larger individuals. However, sex of these young snakes was not recorded. Snout-vent length and tail length in millimeters were 232, 41; 243, 47; 229, 40; 240, 48; and 225, 40 in the order of their birth. These snakes are considerably smaller than the nine young of A. p. piscivorus reported by Wharton (1960:127) that averaged 338 millimeters total length and 28.7 grams. The yolk of one young piscivorus was 11.7 per cent of the total weight. [457] Yolk is used up in about two weeks if its rate of utilization resembles that of the copperhead as reported by Gloyd (1934:600).

Size at birth depends on the mother’s health. According to Fitch (1960:182), many litters of copperheads born in captivity are stunted. Seven young cottonmouths (two males and five females) born in captivity were each 185 millimeters in snout-vent length and 40 millimeters in tail length. The weights of the three living young were 10.0, 10.1, and 11.1 grams. Another litter of five young measured by Richard S. Funk were larger, and differences in the proportions of tail length and snout-vent length suggest the sexual dimorphism found in larger individuals. However, the sex of these young snakes was not recorded. Snout-vent length and tail length in millimeters were 232, 41; 243, 47; 229, 40; 240, 48; and 225, 40 in the order of their birth. These snakes are considerably smaller than the nine young of A. p. piscivorus reported by Wharton (1960:127), which averaged 338 millimeters in total length and 28.7 grams. The yolk of one young piscivorus was 11.7 percent of the total weight. [457] Yolk is used up in about two weeks if its rate of utilization resembles that of the copperhead as reported by Gloyd (1934:600).

Early rates of growth of three living young are shown in Table 10. On the 56th day after birth, each was fed one minnow less than two inches long. Between the 80th and 120th days three additional small minnows were fed to each snake. Young cottonmouths increase nearly 50 millimeters in length by the first spring if they inhabit warm areas and feed in autumn or winter.

Early growth rates of three young snakes are shown in Table 10. On the 56th day after they were born, each was fed one minnow less than two inches long. Between the 80th and 120th days, three more small minnows were given to each snake. Young cottonmouths can grow nearly 50 millimeters in length by the first spring if they live in warm areas and eat in the autumn or winter.

Variation in size of newborn cottonmouths may be less in nature than in captivity. Average size at birth can be determined accurately by the size of young captured in early spring, at least in northern parts of the range where winter feeding and growth do not occur at all or are negligible. Total lengths of 19 juveniles thought by Barbour (1956:38) to be seven to eight months old do not differ markedly from lengths of the five newly-born young measured by Funk.

Variation in the size of newborn cottonmouths might be smaller in the wild than in captivity. The average size at birth can be accurately assessed by measuring young captured in early spring, especially in the northern areas where winter feeding and growth either don't happen or are minimal. The total lengths of 19 juveniles, believed by Barbour (1956:38) to be seven to eight months old, are not significantly different from the lengths of the five newborns measured by Funk.

 

TABLE 10.—Rate of Growth of Three Young Cottonmouths.

TABLE 10.—Growth Rate of Three Young Cottonmouths.

Age
in days
Snout-vent length / tail length—weight in grams
Female No. 1 Female No. 2 Male
2   185/40—11.1 185/40—10.1 185/40—10.0
7   192/40—      190/40—      189/40—      
22   195/40—10.3 200/41.5—10.6 197/40—      
80   204/40—11.7   203/42—10.4 218/48—14.3
88 .... 204/44—    ....
143 215/40.5—13.3 .... 225/48—15.1

The Umbilical Scar

The umbilical cord is broken at birth and the navel closes within a few days; but the scar, involving from two to four ventral scales, remains throughout life. Position of the scar was found by Edgren (1951:1) to be sexually dimorphic in the eastern hog-nose snake (Heterodon platyrhinos), but nothing has been published on this matter concerning the cottonmouth. Consequently, I counted the scales of several individuals from the anal plate, and there was no marked difference in the position of the scar in males and females; it varied in position from the 10th to the 18th scale. When counted from the anterior end, the scar ranged from ventral number 115 to 122 (average, 119) in 28 females and from number 117 to 126 (average, 121) in 14 males. The difference between male and female cottonmouths is not nearly so great as in Heterodon.

The umbilical cord is cut at birth, and the navel heals within a few days; however, the scar, which involves two to four ventral scales, lasts for life. Edgren (1951:1) found that the position of the scar is sexually dimorphic in the eastern hog-nose snake (Heterodon platyrhinos), but there's been no published information on this topic regarding the cottonmouth. As a result, I counted the scales of several individuals from the anal plate, and there was no significant difference in the position of the scar between males and females; it varied in position from the 10th to the 18th scale. When counted from the front, the scar was found to range from ventral number 115 to 122 (average, 119) in 28 females and from number 117 to 126 (average, 121) in 14 males. The difference between male and female cottonmouths is not nearly as pronounced as it is in Heterodon.

Later Growth and Bodily Proportions

The only records of growth increments in a natural population of cottonmouths are those in Table 11. The period of growth is mostly the period of activity, and differences are expected between northern and southern populations. As size increases, determination of growth rate becomes more difficult because age classes overlap in size. Growth of any individual depends not only on climate and food but also on disease and parasitism and the innate [458] size potential. Stabler (1951:91) showed weight and length relationships in two cottonmouths for a period of six and one-half years.

The only records of growth in a natural population of cottonmouths are in Table 11. Growth mostly happens during the active season, and there are likely differences between northern and southern populations. As size increases, it's harder to determine growth rates because age classes overlap in size. The growth of any individual depends not just on climate and food, but also on disease, parasites, and their innate [458] size potential. Stabler (1951:91) showed the relationship between weight and length in two cottonmouths over a period of six and a half years.

 

TABLE 11.—Growth Increments in Cottonmouths (Barbour, 1956:38-39).

TABLE 11.—Growth Increments in Cottonmouths (Barbour, 1956:38-39).

Number of
individuals
Total length
in millimeters
Estimated age
in months
Estimated growth
from preceding year
in millimeters
19 260-298 7-8 25
11 312-337 19-20 45
40 355-485 31-32 95±
83 500-1000 43-44+ ?

My study failed to reveal any secondary sexual difference in growth rate and maximum size. Of the 306 cottonmouths measured by me, 16 males and five females exceeded 700 millimeters in snout-vent length. Two males were more than 850 millimeters long. One cottonmouth lived in captivity for 18 years and 11 months (Perkins, 1955:262). The maximum total lengths were reported by Conant (1958:186-187) to be 74 inches (1876 mm.) in A. p. piscivorus and 54 inches (1370 mm.) in A. p. leucostoma.

My study didn't show any difference between males and females in growth rate or maximum size. Out of the 306 cottonmouths I measured, 16 males and five females were longer than 700 millimeters in snout-vent length. Two males were over 850 millimeters long. One cottonmouth lived in captivity for 18 years and 11 months (Perkins, 1955:262). According to Conant (1958:186-187), the maximum total lengths were reported to be 74 inches (1876 mm) for A. p. piscivorus and 54 inches (1370 mm) for A. p. leucostoma.

Fig. 6. Head length ( ? ) and head width ( ? ) Fig. 6. Head length ( ° ) and head width ( · ) shown as a percentage of snout-vent length in both living and preserved cottonmouths. Head length was measured from the tip of the snout to the back end of the mandible. Head width was measured across the supraocular scales because this method was more accurate than measuring at the back edge of the jaw. There is no sexual dimorphism or geographical variation in these traits.

Proportions of various parts of the body vary considerably depending on age, size and, in some instances, sex. Heads are proportionately larger in young than in adults (Fig. 6), as is true of vertebrates in general. This larger head has survival value for the cottonmouth in permitting more venom [459] to be produced and in permitting it to be injected deeper than would be the case if the proportions were the same as in adults. Relative to the remainder of the snake the head is considerably larger than in the copperhead (Fitch, 1960:108) and slightly larger than in the rattlesnake, Crotalus ruber (Klauber, 1956:152).

Proportions of different body parts vary significantly based on age, size, and sometimes sex. Heads are relatively larger in younger individuals than in adults (Fig. 6), which is generally true for vertebrates. This larger head benefits the cottonmouth by allowing it to produce more venom [459] and enabling it to inject venom deeper than if the proportions were the same as in adults. Compared to the rest of the snake, the head is much larger than in the copperhead (Fitch, 1960:108) and slightly larger than in the rattlesnake, Crotalus ruber (Klauber, 1956:152).

Fig. 7. Tail length expressed as a percentage of snout-vent length Fig. 7. Tail length shown as a percentage of snout-vent length for both living and preserved cottonmouths ( ·—males; °—females ).

In general, tails are relatively longer in males than in females of the same size (Fig. 7), except that there is little or no difference at birth. Growth of the tail in males proceeds at a more rapid rate. In certain individuals sex cannot be recognized from length of the tail relative to snout-vent length because overlapping occurs, especially in medium-sized individuals. Similar changes of proportions with increase in age occur in copperheads (Fitch, 1960:106) and rattlesnakes (Klauber, 1956:158-159), but the tail of the cottonmouth is relatively much longer.

In general, male tails are longer than female tails of the same size (Fig. 7), except for the fact that there's little or no difference at birth. Males experience faster tail growth. In some cases, you can't tell the sex based on the tail's length compared to the snout-vent length because there can be overlap, especially in medium-sized individuals. Similar proportional changes as they age occur in copperheads (Fitch, 1960:106) and rattlesnakes (Klauber, 1956:158-159), but the cottonmouth's tail is relatively much longer.


SHEDDING

The Shedding Operation

Shedding of the skin is necessary to provide for growth and wear in snakes. The milkiness or bluing of the eyes, which causes partial blindness, marks the initial stage of shedding and is caused by a discharge of the exuvial glands that loosens the old stratum corneum from the layer below. In four to seven days the opaqueness disappears, and the snake sheds after an additional three to six days (Table 12). Young snakes first shed within a few days after birth and generally shed more frequently than adults, but the interval is variable. The eyes of three young cottonmouths observed by Wharton (1960:126) became milky on the fourth day but cleared on the seventh day, and the skin was shed on the eighth day. The eyes of three young kept by me became milky two to three days after birth, cleared on the seventh to tenth days, and the skin was shed on the thirteenth day. Possibly the relatively long interval in [460] this instance resulted from low relative humidity in the room where the snakes were kept. According to Fitch (1960:134), litters of young copperheads usually shed within three to ten days after birth; but under unusually dry conditions shedding did not occur for several weeks.

Shedding skin is essential for growth and wear in snakes. The cloudiness or bluish tint of the eyes, which leads to partial blindness, indicates the initial stage of shedding and is caused by a release from the shedding glands that loosens the old stratum corneum from the underlying layer. Within four to seven days, the cloudiness goes away, and the snake sheds its skin after an additional three to six days (Table 12). Young snakes typically shed for the first time a few days after birth and generally shed more often than adults, though the timing can vary. The eyes of three young cottonmouths observed by Wharton (1960:126) became cloudy on the fourth day, cleared up on the seventh day, and the skin was shed on the eighth day. The eyes of three young snakes I kept turned cloudy two to three days after birth, cleared between the seventh and tenth days, and the skin was shed on the thirteenth day. The longer interval in this case may have been due to low humidity in the room where the snakes were kept. According to Fitch (1960:134), litters of young copperheads usually shed within three to ten days after birth, but under unusually dry conditions, shedding can be delayed for several weeks.

 

TABLE 12.—Duration of Preparatory Period (in days) to Shedding in 11 Cottonmouths.

TABLE 12.—Duration of Preparatory Period (in days) to Shedding in 11 Cottonmouths.

Duration of
cloudiness
of eyes
Time between
clearing and
shedding
Time from beginning
of cloudiness
until shedding
5 6 11
7 3 10
- - 6
- - 6
5 3 8
4 6 10
7 3 10
5 6 11
5 3 8
7 - -
7 3 10
X 5.4    X 3.8    X 9.0   

Cottonmouths as well as other snakes usually do not feed until after the skin is shed and are generally quiescent during the period preceding shedding, except that immediately before shedding they become active and rub their snouts on some rough object and may yawn several times seemingly in an attempt to loosen the skin along the edges of the lips. After the skin is loosened from the head, more rubbing against rough surfaces and writhing serves to pull the old skin off, turning it inside out. Once the old skin has passed over the thick mid-body, the snake often crawls forward using rectilinear locomotion until the skin is completely shed. It normally comes off in one piece; but, if the snake is unhealthy or has not had sufficient food or water, the skin may come off in patches. Frequently one or both of the lens coverings are not shed immediately and impair the sight. Bathing or swimming ordinarily causes dried skin to peel off; and, because of the cottonmouth's aquatic habits, its chances of shedding successfully are much greater than those of less aquatic snakes. Cottonmouths that have recently shed have bright and glossy patterns, in contrast to the dull and dark appearance of those that are preparing to shed.

Cottonmouths and other snakes typically don’t eat until after they shed their skin, and they usually stay inactive during the time before shedding. However, right before shedding, they become active, rubbing their snouts against rough objects and yawning several times, seemingly to help loosen the skin around their lips. Once the skin is loosened from their head, they continue rubbing against rough surfaces and writhing to pull off the old skin, turning it inside out. After the old skin has moved past the thick middle section of their body, the snake often moves forward in a straight line until the skin is fully shed. It usually comes off in one piece, but if the snake is unhealthy or hasn't had enough food or water, the skin might come off in patches. Frequently, one or both of the lens coverings might not shed right away, affecting their vision. Bathing or swimming usually helps dried skin peel off, and because cottonmouths are more aquatic, they have a better chance of shedding successfully than less aquatic snakes. Cottonmouths that have recently shed display bright and shiny patterns, while those preparing to shed look dull and dark.

Frequency of Shedding

Most of our knowledge concerning the frequency of shedding is based upon observations of captives. It is known that the intervals between exuviations are largely dependent upon the amount of food taken and the rate of growth. Unless laboratory conditions closely resemble those in the field, shedding frequencies in captives probably differ much from those of free-living snakes.

Most of what we know about how often shedding happens comes from watching snakes in captivity. It's understood that the time between shedding events mainly depends on how much they eat and how fast they grow. Unless the lab conditions are very similar to those in the wild, the shedding frequencies observed in captives are likely quite different from those of wild snakes.

Only two of my captives shed twice. The intervals between exuviations [461] in the two snakes were eight and five months, lasting from August to April and from December to May, respectively. Ten other snakes shed once in the period from January through July. Stabler (1951:91) presented data concerning shedding of two cottonmouths kept 12 and 14 years in captivity. One shed 25 times in 12 years and the other shed 37 times in 14 years, giving an average of 2.1 and 2.6 per year, respectively. Neither of the snakes shed from December through March, but the period of shedding corresponded to the period of greatest activity and growth. In Florida, cottonmouths shed four to six times a year, according to rate of growth (Allen and Swindell, 1948:7).

Only two of my captured snakes shed their skin twice. The time between each shedding [461] for the two snakes was eight months and five months, lasting from August to April and from December to May, respectively. Ten other snakes shed their skin once between January and July. Stabler (1951:91) reported data on two cottonmouths that were kept in captivity for 12 and 14 years. One snake shed 25 times over 12 years, while the other shed 37 times in 14 years, resulting in averages of 2.1 and 2.6 sheds per year, respectively. Neither snake shed their skin between December and March, but their shedding periods aligned with their times of highest activity and growth. In Florida, cottonmouths shed their skin four to six times a year, depending on their growth rate (Allen and Swindell, 1948:7).


FOOD HABITS

Methods of Obtaining Prey

Food is obtained by a variety of methods depending on the type of food, age of the cottonmouth, and possibly other factors. Some captives lie in ambush and others crawl slowly in active search. At the first cue of possible prey, either by sight, scent, or differential temperature detection by the pit, the snake appears to become alert and flicks its tongue out at fairly rapid intervals.

Food is gathered through different methods based on the type of food, the age of the cottonmouth, and perhaps other factors. Some of them wait in ambush while others move slowly in search. At the first sign of potential prey, whether through sight, smell, or detecting differences in temperature with the pit, the snake seems to become alert and flicks its tongue out at fairly quick intervals.

By means of the facial or loreal pit found in all crotalids, the snake is able to detect objects having temperatures different from that of the surroundings of the objects. In detecting prey the tongue acts to sharpen the sense of "smell" by conveying particles to Jacobson's organs in the roof of the mouth. On many occasions cottonmouths appeared to rely solely on sight; they passed within a few inches of prey, apparently unaware of its presence until it moved. When pools of water begin to dry up toward the end of summer, cottonmouths often congregate and feed on dying fish. In these instances the fish are usually taken as they come to the surface. In laboratory observations moccasins seize live fish and some moccasins carry the fish until they have received lethal doses of venom; afterward the fish are swallowed. But grasping and manipulation of the prey occurs without the fangs' being employed, especially in the case of dead fish. On one occasion a cottonmouth was observed to grasp the edge of a glass dish that had contained fish and apparently retained the odor. On another occasion I placed several fish in a bowl, rubbed a stick on the fish, and then touched each snake lightly on the nose with the stick. The snakes crawled directly to the bowl and began feeding. At other times these same snakes crawled around the cage in an apparent attempt to locate the food but paid little attention to fish held in front of them. If the catching of prey under natural conditions were as uncoordinated as it sometimes is in captivity, the snakes probably would not be able to survive.

Using the facial or loreal pit that all crotalids have, the snake can detect objects with temperatures that differ from their surroundings. When hunting for prey, the tongue enhances the sense of "smell" by transferring particles to Jacobson's organs in the roof of the mouth. Often, cottonmouths seem to rely only on sight; they can pass just inches from their prey, seemingly unaware until it moves. As summer ends and water pools begin to dry up, cottonmouths tend to gather and feed on dying fish, usually catching them as they come to the surface. In lab settings, moccasins catch live fish, and some carry them until they’ve received lethal doses of venom before swallowing. However, they grasp and handle their prey without using their fangs, especially when it comes to dead fish. Once, a cottonmouth was seen gripping the edge of a glass dish that had held fish and seemed to retain the scent. On another occasion, I placed several fish in a bowl, rubbed a stick on them, and then lightly touched each snake’s nose with the stick. The snakes went straight to the bowl and started eating. At other times, these same snakes crawled around their enclosure as if trying to find food but ignored the fish placed in front of them. If catching prey in the wild were as disorganized as it sometimes appears in captivity, the snakes probably wouldn't be able to survive.

Wharton (1960:127-129) described tail-luring in one individual of a 76-day-old brood of cottonmouths. The snake lay loosely coiled with the tail held about six centimeters from the ground; a constant waving motion passed posteriorly through the terminal inch of the tail. These movements ceased at 7:20 p.m. but were resumed at 7:40 a.m. the following day. All observations were under artificial light. The "caudal lure" as a means of obtaining prey has been described in other species and related genera by Neill (1960:194) and Ditmars (1915:424).

Wharton (1960:127-129) described a 76-day-old brood of cottonmouths using tail-luring. The snake was loosely coiled, with its tail about six centimeters off the ground, constantly waving the last inch of its tail. These movements stopped at 7:20 p.m. but started again at 7:40 a.m. the next day. All observations took place under artificial light. The "caudal lure" as a way to catch prey has also been reported in other species and related genera by Neill (1960:194) and Ditmars (1915:424).

Various authors have suggested that the method of capture differs according to the kind of prey. Allen and Swindell (1948:5) stated that cottonmouths retain their hold after striking fish or frogs but will release a mouse after delivering a bite and are timid in striking at larger rodents. Neill (1947:203) noted that a cottonmouth always waited several minutes after biting a large rat before approaching its prey. This same type of behavior has been reported for copperheads (Fitch, 1960:194) and rattlesnakes (Klauber, 1956:618). [462] Cottonmouths observed by me retained a strong hold on fish, frogs, and sometimes mice, but almost always released large mice and baby chicks, which were not eaten until after death.

Various authors have suggested that the way animals catch their prey varies depending on the type of prey. Allen and Swindell (1948:5) pointed out that cottonmouths hold onto fish or frogs after striking them but will let go of a mouse after biting it, and they are cautious when attacking larger rodents. Neill (1947:203) observed that a cottonmouth typically waits several minutes after biting a large rat before going in for the kill. This same behavior has also been seen in copperheads (Fitch, 1960:194) and rattlesnakes (Klauber, 1956:618). [462] Cottonmouths I observed kept a tight grip on fish, frogs, and sometimes mice, but almost always let go of large mice and baby chicks, which they didn't eat until after they were dead.

Different behavior according to type of prey is correlated with ability of prey to retaliate, although some animals may not be released because they could easily escape. For instance, a frog could hop far enough to escape in a matter of seconds if released. A 73-millimeter Rana pipiens that I observed was bitten twice within one and a quarter hours and died 45 minutes after the last bite. Its movement was uncoordinated by the time of the second bite, but it could have escaped had the frog not been confined. Although it is doubtful that normal, healthy fish are frequently captured by cottonmouths, Allen (1932:17) reported that a cottonmouth was seen pushing a small, dead pike about on the surface of a stream. A wound on the belly of the fish indicated that it had been bitten. A 17-gram creek chub (Semotilus) and a 13.7-gram bass (Micropterus) were injected by me with one-fourth cubic centimeter of fresh venom near the base of the tail in order to determine whether the fish could escape after being bitten and released. The creek chub flipped onto its back after a minute and 45 seconds and gill movements stopped in eight minutes and 35 seconds; the bass flipped over after 50 seconds and died in two minutes and 10 seconds. The venom immediately affected both fish, and it is unlikely that either could have swum more than a few feet.

Different behavior based on the type of prey is linked to the prey's ability to fight back, although some animals might not be released because they could easily escape. For example, a frog could hop far enough to get away in just a few seconds if it were released. A 73-millimeter Rana pipiens that I observed was bitten twice within one hour and fifteen minutes and died 45 minutes after the last bite. By the time of the second bite, its movements were uncoordinated, but it could have escaped if it hadn't been confined. Although it's unlikely that normal, healthy fish are often caught by cottonmouths, Allen (1932:17) reported seeing a cottonmouth pushing a small, dead pike along the surface of a stream. A wound on the fish's belly suggested it had been bitten. I injected a 17-gram creek chub (Semotilus) and a 13.7-gram bass (Micropterus) with a quarter cubic centimeter of fresh venom near the base of their tails to see if they could escape after being bitten and released. The creek chub flipped onto its back after one minute and 45 seconds, and gill movements stopped after eight minutes and 35 seconds; the bass flipped over after 50 seconds and died in two minutes and 10 seconds. The venom affected both fish immediately, and it’s unlikely that either could have swum more than a few feet.

After its prey has been killed, a cottonmouth examines the body from end to end by touching it with the tongue. Then the animal is grasped in the mouth without the use of the fangs and is slowly manipulated until one end (usually the head) is held in the mouth. The lengthy process of swallowing then takes place, the fangs and lower jaws alternately pushing the prey down the throat.

After catching its prey, a cottonmouth inspects the body from one end to the other by tasting it with its tongue. Then, the snake grabs the prey in its mouth without using its fangs and carefully adjusts it until one end (usually the head) is positioned in its mouth. The lengthy swallowing process then begins, with the fangs and lower jaws pushing the prey down its throat in a coordinated manner.

Food and Food Preferences

The cottonmouth seems to be an opportunistic omni-carnivore, because it eats almost any type of flesh that is available, including carrion. It feeds primarily upon vertebrates found in or near water; but invertebrates and eggs have also been found in the diet. The only potential prey items that seem not to be normally eaten are bufonid toads and tadpoles. I have occasionally offered tadpoles and frogs to cottonmouths, but only the frogs were accepted. But, Stanley Roth kept a cottonmouth in captivity that ate both toads and tadpoles. If tadpoles are commonly eaten, their probable rapid digestion would make identification almost impossible.

The cottonmouth appears to be an opportunistic omni-carnivore since it eats just about any kind of flesh available, including carrion. It mainly feeds on vertebrates found in or near water; however, invertebrates and eggs have also been part of its diet. The only potential prey that it typically doesn't eat seems to be bufonid toads and tadpoles. I’ve occasionally offered tadpoles and frogs to cottonmouths, but they only accepted the frogs. However, Stanley Roth kept a cottonmouth in captivity that ate both toads and tadpoles. If tadpoles are commonly consumed, their likely rapid digestion would make identification nearly impossible.

Following is a list of known foods of the cottonmouth:

Following is a list of known foods of the cottonmouth:

Captivity: "... rattlesnake.... The same moccasin also killed and ate a smaller snake of its own species...." (Conant, 1934:382.)

Captivity: "... rattlesnake.... The same moccasin also killed and ate a smaller snake of its own species...." (Conant, 1934:382.)

Florida: "3 heron feathers, bird bone, Eumeces inexpectatus, 3 fish all under one inch in length, 1 heron egg shell" (Carr, 1936:89). According to Allen and Swindell (1948:5), "the food included other moccasins, prairie rattlesnakes, king-snakes, black snakes, water snakes, garter snakes, ribbon snakes, and horn snakes ... most of the species of frogs, baby alligators, mice, rats, guinea pigs, young rabbits, birds, bats, squirrels, and lizards ... a mud turtle ... a case of a four footer eating ten to twelve chicken eggs. The most common food appears to be fish and frogs. Catfish are included on this list...." Yerger (1953:115) mentions "an adult yellow bullhead, Ameiurus natalis ... 306 mm. in standard length [from a 63-inch cottonmouth]."

Florida: "3 heron feathers, bird bone, Eumeces inexpectatus, 3 fish all less than one inch long, 1 heron eggshell" (Carr, 1936:89). According to Allen and Swindell (1948:5), "the diet included various moccasins, prairie rattlesnakes, king snakes, black snakes, water snakes, garter snakes, ribbon snakes, and horned snakes ... most types of frogs, baby alligators, mice, rats, guinea pigs, young rabbits, birds, bats, squirrels, and lizards ... a mud turtle ... a case of a four-footer eating ten to twelve chicken eggs. The most common food seems to be fish and frogs. Catfish are on this list...." Yerger (1953:115) notes "an adult yellow bullhead, Ameiurus natalis ... 306 mm in standard length [from a 63-inch cottonmouth]."

Georgia: "... full grown Rana catesbeiana, several foot-long pickerel ... dead fish if placed in a pan of water.... Natrix sipedon fasciata and Masticophis flagellum ... rats.... Toads and large Eumeces laticeps were always ignored." (Neill, 1947:203.) "Natrix, Heterodon, Kinosternon, Rana, Hyla cinerea, Microhyla, Microtine [Pitymys pinetorum]." (Hamilton and Pollack, 1955:3.)

Georgia: "... fully grown Rana catesbeiana, several foot-long pickerel ... dead fish if placed in a pan of water.... Natrix sipedon fasciata and Masticophis flagellum ... rats.... Toads and large Eumeces laticeps were often overlooked." (Neill, 1947:203.) "Natrix, Heterodon, Kinosternon, Rana, Hyla cinerea, Microhyla, Microtine [Pitymys pinetorum]." (Hamilton and Pollack, 1955:3.)

Mississippi: "... Hyla gratiosa.... In captivity specimens have eaten frogs, mice, birds, dead fish, pigmy rattlers and copperheads. Toads ... were refused" (Allen, 1932:17). One moccasin "disgorged a smaller decapitated moccasin ... killed the day before by boys" (Smith and List, 1955:123).

Mississippi: "... Hyla gratiosa.... In captivity, these animals have eaten frogs, mice, birds, dead fish, pygmy rattlesnakes, and copperheads. They refused to eat toads" (Allen, 1932:17). One moccasin "spit out a smaller decapitated moccasin ... killed the day before by kids" (Smith and List, 1955:123).

Tennessee: "Beetles in one stomach; lizard (Eumeces) in another stomach; small snake (Natrix) in one intestine, and hair in another intestine. One stomach contained numerous bits of wood, up to four inches in length...." (Goodman, 1958:149.)

Tennessee: "Beetles in one stomach; lizard (Eumeces) in another stomach; small snake (Natrix) in one intestine, and hair in another intestine. One stomach had many wood pieces, up to four inches long...." (Goodman, 1958:149.)

Kentucky: "Siren intermedia was the most abundant food item in both volume and occurrence. Frogs of the genus Rana ranked second. Together, these two items comprised almost 2/3 of the food of the snakes. The other food items were distributed among the fishes, reptiles, and other amphibians [one Rana tadpole included]." (Based on 42 samples—Barbour, 1956:37.)

Kentucky: "Siren intermedia was the most common food item in both amount and frequency. Frogs from the genus Rana came in second. Together, these two items made up almost 2/3 of the snakes' diet. The remaining food sources included various fish, reptiles, and other amphibians [including one Rana tadpole]." (Based on 42 samples—Barbour, 1956:37.)

Illinois: (Based on 84 samples—Klimstra, 1959:5.)

Illinois: (Based on 84 samples—Klimstra, 1959:5.)

Food Item Percent Frequency
of Occurrence
Percent
Volume
Pisces 39.3 31.9
Amphibia 36.9 26.0
Reptilia 25.0 18.2
Mammalia 30.9 17.9
Gastropoda 17.8 1.0
Miscellaneous 25.0 5.0
(Algae, Arachnida, Aves, Insecta)

Louisiana: Penn (1943:59) mentions that a "female had just eaten two young cottonmouths...." Clark (1949:259) mentions "100 specimens—34 fish; 25 Rana pipiens; 16 Rana clamitans; 7 Acris; 4 Natrix sipedon confluens; 8 birds; 5 squirrels ... catfish thirteen and one-half inches in length ... small-mouth black bass [eleven inches]."

Louisiana: Penn (1943:59) notes that a "female had just eaten two young cottonmouths...." Clark (1949:259) lists "100 specimens—34 fish; 25 Rana pipiens; 16 Rana clamitans; 7 Acris; 4 Natrix sipedon confluens; 8 birds; 5 squirrels ... catfish that were thirteen and a half inches long ... small-mouth black bass [eleven inches]."

Oklahoma: Force (1930:37) remarks that the moccasin "eats bullfrogs ... but refuses leopard frogs." Trowbridge (1937:299) writes: "several sun perch.... Another had eaten six catfish six to ten inches long ... a water snake (Natrix s. transversa) about 18 inches long ... frogs, mostly Rana sphenocephala." Carpenter (1958:115) mentions "a juvenile woodthrush.... Seven last instar cicadas ... a young cottontail." According to Laughlin (1959:84), one moccasin "contained the following items: 18 contour feathers of a duck, probably a teal; one juvenile cooter turtle, Pseudemys floridana; and a large mass of odd-looking unidentifiable material. The other cottonmouth contained one juvenile pond turtle, Pseudemys scripta...."

Oklahoma: Force (1930:37) notes that the moccasin "eats bullfrogs ... but won't touch leopard frogs." Trowbridge (1937:299) states: "several sun perch... Another had eaten six catfish that were six to ten inches long ... a water snake (Natrix s. transversa) about 18 inches long ... frogs, mostly Rana sphenocephala." Carpenter (1958:115) mentions "a juvenile woodthrush... Seven last instar cicadas ... a young cottontail." According to Laughlin (1959:84), one moccasin "contained the following items: 18 contour feathers of a duck, probably a teal; one juvenile cooter turtle, Pseudemys floridana; and a large mass of strange-looking unidentifiable material. The other cottonmouth contained one juvenile pond turtle, Pseudemys scripta...."

Texas: "... several ... feeding on frogs.... One ... found DOR was found to contain a large catfish." (Guidry, 1953:54.)

Texas: "... several ... feeding on frogs.... One ... found DOR had a large catfish." (Guidry, 1953:54.)

Of 246 cottonmouths that I examined for food items, only 46 contained prey in their digestive tracts. Almost all of the snakes examined were museum specimens that had been collected at many places over a period of about 40 years. It was not known how long each had been kept alive before being preserved. Therefore it was impossible to determine what proportion of any population of cottonmouths could be expected to contain food. The food items were not analyzed numerically because the scales and hair, by means of which many food items in the intestine were identified, yielded no clue as to the number of individuals actually present unless several [464] distinct kinds were found. Each occurrence of scales or hair was thus recorded as a single individual, although some such occurrences may have represented more than one animal. The contents of some stomachs were so well digested that it was difficult to determine the number of items present. As a rule only one food item was present in a digestive tract, but a few tracts contained several items of the same or different species. Three frogs (Acris crepitans) were in one snake and three hylas (Hyla versicolor) in another. Still another individual captured beside a drying pond contained six individuals of Lepomis each about three inches long and two pikes (Esox) about six inches long.

Of the 246 cottonmouths I looked at for food items, only 46 had prey in their digestive tracts. Most of the snakes I examined were museum specimens collected from various locations over around 40 years. It was uncertain how long each had been kept alive before being preserved. Therefore, it was impossible to figure out what proportion of any cottonmouth population could be expected to have food. The food items weren’t analyzed numerically because the scales and hair, which helped identify many food items in the intestine, didn’t reveal how many individuals were actually present unless several [464] distinct types were found. Each appearance of scales or hair was recorded as a single individual, even though some of these occurrences might have represented more than one animal. The contents of some stomachs were so thoroughly digested that it was hard to determine the number of items present. Usually, there was only one food item in a digestive tract, but a few contained several items of the same or different species. One snake had three frogs (Acris crepitans), and another had three hylas (Hyla versicolor). Yet another individual caught next to a drying pond contained six individuals of Lepomis, each about three inches long, and two pikes (Esox) around six inches long.

 

TABLE 13.—Analysis of Food Items of 46 Cottonmouths Collected in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas (1922-1962).

TABLE 13.—Analysis of Food Items of 46 Cottonmouths Collected in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas (1922-1962).

  Food Products Number of
samples in
which item
occurred
Percent
frequency
of
occurrence
Estimated
weight
in
grams
Estimated
percentage
by
bulk
Fish (7) 13.2   18.4
  Esox sp. 1   20  
  Lepomis sp. 2   15  
  Unidentified 4      
           
Amphibians (12) 23.0   20.4
  Scaphiopus hurteri 1   13  
  Acris crepitans 2   4  
  Hyla cinerea 2   12  
  Hyla versicolor 1   12  
  Rana catesbeiana 1   20  
  Rana pipiens 3   15  
  Unidentified 2      
           
Reptiles (15) 28.4   29.9
  Pseudemys scripta 2   15  
  Anolis carolinensis 1   6  
  Eumeces fasciatus 1   7  
  Lygosoma laterale 2   5  
  Natrix sp. 1   10  
  Natrix erythrogaster 2   10  
  Agkistrodon piscivorus 2   20  
  Crotalus sp. 1   30  
  Unidentified snakes 3      
           
Birds (4) 7.6   18.6
  Anhinga anhinga (juv.) 1   60  
  Egret (head and neck) 1   20  
  Passeriformes 2   20  
           
Mammals (6) 11.3   12.7
  Blarina brevicauda 1   12  
  Cricetinae 5   18  
           
Unidentified (9) 17.0    

The "unidentified" category (Table 13) refers to jellylike masses in the stomach or material in the intestine in which no scales, feathers, hair, or bones [465] could be found. Most of the unidentifiable matter could be assumed to consist of remains of amphibians, since they leave no hard parts. If this assumption is correct, amphibians comprise about 40 per cent of the diet. Since intestinal contents were included, a volumetric analysis was not feasible. Therefore, the weight of each type of food item was estimated and the percentage by bulk calculated from it (Table 13).

The "unidentified" category (Table 13) refers to jelly-like substances in the stomach or material in the intestine where no scales, feathers, hair, or bones [465] could be found. Most of the unidentifiable matter is likely made up of remnants of amphibians, as they don’t leave behind any hard parts. If this assumption holds true, amphibians make up about 40 percent of the diet. Since we included intestinal contents, a volumetric analysis wasn’t possible. Thus, the weight of each type of food item was estimated and the percentage by bulk was calculated from that (Table 13).

Pieces of dead leaves and small sticks constituted most of the plant material found and presumably were ingested secondarily because they adhered to the moist skin of the prey, especially to fish and amphibians. However, some plant materials probably are eaten because they have acquired the odor of the prey. One cottonmouth contained a Hyla cinerea, several leaves, and five sticks from 37 to 95 millimeters long and from 12 to 14 millimeters in diameter.

Pieces of dead leaves and small twigs made up most of the plant material found and likely got ingested secondarily because they stuck to the moist skin of the prey, especially fish and amphibians. However, some plant materials are probably eaten because they've taken on the scent of the prey. One cottonmouth had a Hyla cinerea, several leaves, and five sticks that were between 37 to 95 millimeters long and 12 to 14 millimeters in diameter.

Most reports in the literature state that gravid females do not feed, but four gravid females examined by me containing large, well-developed embryos also contained evidences of having recently fed. Two of them had scales of snakes in the stomach or intestine, one contained a six-inch Lepomis, and the other had hair in the intestine and the head and neck of an adult egret in the stomach.

Most studies in the literature say that pregnant females don’t eat, but four pregnant females I examined that had large, well-developed embryos also showed signs of having recently fed. Two of them had snake scales in their stomach or intestines, one had a six-inch Lepomis, and the other had hair in the intestines along with the head and neck of an adult egret in the stomach.


MORTALITY FACTORS

Natural Enemies and Predators

Published records of other animals preying on cottonmouths or killing them are few. Reptiles more often than other classes of vertebrates prey on the cottonmouth. McIlhenny (1935:44) reported on the scarcity of snakes in areas where alligators were present. Predation on cottonmouths by indigo snakes (Drymarchon corais) was reported by Conant (1958:153) and Lee (1964:32). Allen and Swindell (1948:6) obtained a photograph of a king-snake (Lampropeltis getulus) killing a cottonmouth but thought that moccasins are not eaten by L. getulus. However, one occasion reported herein shows that cottonmouths are eaten by king-snakes; and Clark (1949:252) reported finding 13 cottonmouths, along with other prey, in the stomach contents of 301 king-snakes (L. g. holbrooki) from northwestern Louisiana. Cannibalism is also common among cottonmouths. Klauber (1956:1058;1079) cited predation on cottonmouths by a blue heron (Ardea herodias) and a largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Man is probably the greatest enemy of the cottonmouth. Intentional killing, capturing, road kills, and alteration of the environment destroy large numbers.

Published records of other animals preying on cottonmouths or killing them are rare. Reptiles more frequently than other types of vertebrates prey on cottonmouths. McIlhenny (1935:44) noted the lack of snakes in areas where alligators were present. Indigo snakes (Drymarchon corais) preying on cottonmouths was reported by Conant (1958:153) and Lee (1964:32). Allen and Swindell (1948:6) took a photograph of a king snake (Lampropeltis getulus) killing a cottonmouth but believed that moccasins are not eaten by L. getulus. However, one instance reported here shows that king snakes do eat cottonmouths; and Clark (1949:252) found 13 cottonmouths, along with other prey, in the stomach contents of 301 king snakes (L. g. holbrooki) from northwestern Louisiana. Cannibalism is also common among cottonmouths. Klauber (1956:1058;1079) mentioned predation on cottonmouths by a blue heron (Ardea herodias) and a largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Humans are likely the biggest threat to the cottonmouth. Intentional killings, captures, road kills, and environmental changes destroy large numbers.

Parasites and Diseases

Allen and Swindell (1948:12) listed several diseases and parasites of snakes and stated that "some moccasins captured in the woods are so poor and weak from parasitic infection that they can barely crawl." The only kind of ectoparasite found on captive cottonmouths in the course of my study was a snake mite, Ophionyssus natricus. An infestation of that mite was thought to be partly responsible for the death of one captive moccasin. Other moccasins spent increasing amounts of time in their water dish after they became infected with mites. Under natural conditions frequent swimming probably keeps cottonmouths nearly free of mites.

Allen and Swindell (1948:12) identified several diseases and parasites affecting snakes and mentioned that "some moccasins caught in the woods are so poor and weak from parasitic infections that they can barely crawl." The only type of ectoparasite found on captive cottonmouths during my study was a snake mite, Ophionyssus natricus. An infestation of this mite was believed to be partially responsible for the death of one captive moccasin. Other moccasins spent more and more time in their water dish after they became infested with mites. In their natural habitat, frequent swimming likely helps keep cottonmouths almost free from mites.

Endoparasites found included lung flukes, stomach nematodes, and tapeworms. Lung flukes (Ochetosoma sp.) were found in 16 of 20 captive cottonmouths. [466] Snails and frogs serve as intermediate hosts for various stages in the life cycle of these flukes. The high percentage of cottonmouths infested with flukes is indicative of the use of frogs as a major source of food. Less than ten flukes were usually observed in the snakes' mouths but occasionally more were seen. One snake was observed thrashing about in its cage for nearly an hour, after which time it died. Upon examination of the mouth, 32 flukes were found, most of which were located in the Jacobson's organs. Whether or not flukes caused the death is not known. Nematodes (Kalicephalus sp.) were found in the stomach of each of several preserved specimens; most of these snakes had no food in their digestive tracts. In a high percentage of the moccasins, tapeworms (Ophiotaenia sp.) were in the duodenum, in many instances so tightly packed as seemingly to prevent passage of food. The importance of fish in the diet is reflected by the high percentage of snakes containing tapeworms. An unidentified cyst (?) about an inch long and containing two hooks on one end was found attached to the outer wall of the stomach of a cottonmouth. Yamaguti (1958) listed all the kinds of helminths known from cottonmouths.

Endoparasites found included lung flukes, stomach nematodes, and tapeworms. Lung flukes (Ochetosoma sp.) were found in 16 out of 20 captive cottonmouths. [466] Snails and frogs act as intermediate hosts for different stages in the life cycle of these flukes. The high percentage of cottonmouths infested with flukes suggests that frogs are a major food source. Usually, fewer than ten flukes were seen in the snakes' mouths, though sometimes more were observed. One snake was seen thrashing around in its cage for almost an hour before it died. When its mouth was examined, 32 flukes were found, most located in the Jacobson's organs. It's unclear whether the flukes caused its death. Nematodes (Kalicephalus sp.) were found in the stomach of several preserved specimens, and most of these snakes had no food in their digestive tracts. A large percentage of the moccasins contained tapeworms (Ophiotaenia sp.) in the duodenum, often so densely packed that they seemed to block food passage. The significance of fish in their diet is indicated by the high percentage of snakes with tapeworms. An unidentified cyst, about an inch long and with two hooks on one end, was found attached to the outer wall of a cottonmouth's stomach. Yamaguti (1958) documented all known types of helminths in cottonmouths.

Miscellaneous Causes of Death

Munro (1949:71-72) reported on the lethal effect of 10 per cent DDT powder on two young cottonmouths which were dusted with it to kill mites. Herald (1949:117) reported an equal effect caused by spraying a five per cent DDT solution in a room with several snakes. All but three large cottonmouths, which were under shelter at the time of spraying, were killed.

Munro (1949:71-72) reported on the deadly effect of 10 percent DDT powder on two young cottonmouths that were treated with it to eliminate mites. Herald (1949:117) observed a similar effect from spraying a five percent DDT solution in a room with several snakes. All but three large cottonmouths, which were sheltered at the time of spraying, were killed.

One individual that refused to eat was dissected soon after death, and a short piece of a branch on which two large thorns were located at 90° angles was found blocking the intestine at the posterior end of the stomach.

One person who refused to eat was examined shortly after death, and a small piece of a branch with two large thorns positioned at 90° angles was discovered blocking the intestine at the back end of the stomach.

An unexpected and probably unusual circumstance caused the death of two captives. After cleaning a cage containing five cottonmouths and placing several mice in the cage for food, I noticed two of the snakes lying stretched out, partially on one side, and almost unable to move. At first I thought they had been bitten by other snakes which were in pursuit of the mice. The two died after two days. When a similar incident occurred in another cage, I removed the "bitten" snake and it fully recovered after 11 days. When the same symptoms were observed in a garter snake in another cage, I realized that in each instance the cage had been cleaned and fresh cedar chips placed in it immediately prior to observation of these symptoms. Fine cedar dust on the chips had evidently poisoned the snakes.

An unexpected and probably unusual situation led to the death of two captives. After cleaning a cage that housed five cottonmouth snakes and putting several mice in it for food, I noticed two of the snakes lying flat, partially on one side, and almost unable to move. At first, I thought they had been bitten by the other snakes that were chasing the mice. The two snakes died after two days. When a similar incident happened in another cage, I took out the "bitten" snake, and it fully recovered after 11 days. When I saw the same symptoms in a garter snake in a different cage, I realized that in each case, the cage had been cleaned and fresh cedar chips were added just before I observed these symptoms. The fine cedar dust on the chips had clearly poisoned the snakes.


BEHAVIOR

Annual and Diel Cycles of Activity

In the days following emergence in spring, cottonmouths often endure uncomfortable and even dangerous temperatures in order to obtain food and mates. They are more sluggish at this time and more vulnerable to predation than later in the season when temperatures are optimal. Fitch (1956:463) found that copperheads in northeastern Kansas begin their annual cycle of activity in the latter part of April, when the daily maximum temperature is about 22° C. and the minimum is about 4° C., and become dormant in late [467] October or early November, at which time the daily maximum temperature is about 15° and the minimum is about 0°. Indications are that in the northern part of its range the annual activity cycle of the cottonmouth resembles that of the copperhead in northeastern Kansas. Klimstra (1959:2) captured cottonmouths from April to October in southern Illinois. Barbour (1956:36) collected large numbers of them in early April in Kentucky and stated that they migrate from swamps to wooded hillsides in late August and early September. Spring migrations begin after a few consecutive warm days in March. In northern Oklahoma cottonmouths have been found along the Verdigris River as early as March, suggesting that a few winter in crayfish holes and mammal burrows. The majority of individuals found in this area were at denning sites along cliffs above the river and emerged later than those near the river (Dundee and Burger, 1948:1-2). In Virginia cottonmouths have been seen as early as March 5 (Martin and Wood, 1955:237) and as late as December 4. They have been observed in migration from the swamps of the barrier beach to the mainland in late October and early November in southeastern Virginia (Wood, 1954a:159). According to Neill (1947:204), the cottonmouth tolerates lower temperatures than do most snakes in Georgia and is one of the last to go into hibernation. Allen and Swindell (1948:4) stated that cottonmouths usually bask during the mornings of the cooler months in Florida, but they mentioned nothing of denning such as occurs farther north. Although winter aggregations occur in the northern parts of the range, I have never seen such aggregations in the South. However, in one instance related to me by a reliable observer, seven cottonmouths were found together on a creek bank near the Gulf Coast in early spring.

In the days after they come out in spring, cottonmouths often deal with uncomfortable and even unsafe temperatures to find food and mates. During this time, they are more sluggish and more vulnerable to predators than later in the season when temperatures are just right. Fitch (1956:463) found that copperheads in northeastern Kansas start their annual activity cycle in late April, when the daily high temperature is about 22° C and the low is about 4° C, and they become dormant in late [467] October or early November, by which time the daily high is around 15° and the low is about 0°. Evidence suggests that in the northern part of their range, the annual activity cycle of the cottonmouth is similar to that of the copperhead in northeastern Kansas. Klimstra (1959:2) captured cottonmouths from April to October in southern Illinois. Barbour (1956:36) collected many of them in early April in Kentucky and noted that they migrate from swamps to wooded hillsides in late August and early September. Spring migrations start after a few warm days in March. In northern Oklahoma, cottonmouths have been found along the Verdigris River as early as March, indicating that some may winter in crayfish holes and mammal burrows. Most individuals discovered in this area were at den sites along cliffs above the river and emerged later than those near the river (Dundee and Burger, 1948:1-2). In Virginia, cottonmouths have been spotted as early as March 5 (Martin and Wood, 1955:237) and as late as December 4. They have been seen migrating from the swamps of the barrier beach to the mainland in late October and early November in southeastern Virginia (Wood, 1954a:159). According to Neill (1947:204), the cottonmouth can tolerate lower temperatures than most snakes in Georgia and is one of the last to enter hibernation. Allen and Swindell (1948:4) noted that cottonmouths typically bask in the mornings during the cooler months in Florida, but they did not mention denning like they do farther north. Although winter gatherings occur in the northern parts of their range, I have never seen such gatherings in the South. However, one reliable observer told me about an instance where seven cottonmouths were found together on a creek bank near the Gulf Coast in early spring.

During late summer and early autumn, fat is deposited in lobes in the lower abdomen in preparation for the period of winter quiescence. Gravid females usually do not feed so frequently or so much as other snakes, because they tend to become inactive as the ova develop. Whether or not females feed heavily after parturition and previous to denning is not known. Peaks of activity in autumn may be caused by final attempts to feed before denning and by the appearance of large numbers of newborn young. The young usually have from one to two months in which to feed before the advent of cold weather. According to Barbour's (op. cit.:38) findings, the young probably feed before hibernation because they grow substantially in winter. For those that do not feed, the rate of survival is perhaps much lower.

During late summer and early autumn, fat is stored in lobes in the lower abdomen to prepare for the winter dormancy period. Gravid females typically don’t eat as often or as much as other snakes because they become less active as their eggs develop. It’s not clear if females feed heavily after giving birth and before going into hibernation. In the fall, peaks of activity may happen as they try to eat one last time before hibernation and when many newborns start to appear. The young usually have about one to two months to feed before cold weather arrives. According to Barbour's (op. cit.:38) findings, the young likely eat before hibernation because they grow a lot over the winter. For those that don’t eat, the survival rate might be much lower.

In preparation for winter, cottonmouths migrate inland, usually to dry forested hillsides where they den, commonly among rocks at the tops of bluffs, along with several other species of snakes. In such aggregations there is no hostility and each individual may derive benefit from contact with others by which favorable conditions of temperature and humidity are maintained.

In preparation for winter, cottonmouths move inland, typically to dry, forested hillsides where they find shelter, often among rocks at the tops of bluffs, alongside several other snake species. In these groups, there is no aggression, and each snake can benefit from being in contact with others, helping to maintain favorable temperature and humidity conditions.

Neill (1947:204) has found many specimens in winter by tearing bark from rotting pine stumps on hillsides overlooking lakes or streams. On cold days they evidently retreat below the surface, while on warm days they lie just below the bark or emerge and bask. Neill believes that the use of stumps by cottonmouths is an innate pattern of behavior, because of the large number of young-of-the-year found in such surroundings. Cottonmouths were observed in winter also under logs and stumps by Allen (1932:17). I have twice observed cottonmouths crawling into crayfish burrows along the Gulf Coast of Texas, and suppose they are used as denning sites to some extent.

Neill (1947:204) has found many specimens in winter by peeling bark off rotting pine stumps on hillsides overlooking lakes or streams. On cold days, they apparently retreat below the surface, while on warm days, they stay just below the bark or come out to bask. Neill thinks that using stumps is an instinctual behavior for cottonmouths, due to the large number of young-of-the-year found in those areas. Allen (1932:17) also observed cottonmouths in winter hiding under logs and stumps. I have seen cottonmouths crawl into crayfish burrows along the Gulf Coast of Texas twice, and I assume they use these as denning sites to some degree.

The diel cycle of activity of cottonmouths is of necessity closely related to the seasonal cycle. Since optimal temperatures determine activity, the diel cycle varies greatly from time to time. It has been well established that cottonmouths, like most other crotalids and many snakes of other families, prefer nocturnal to diurnal activity, even though the temperature may be less favorable at night. This preference is correlated with increased nocturnal activity of frogs and reptiles that constitute the principal food supply.

The daily activity cycle of cottonmouths is closely tied to the seasonal cycle. Because ideal temperatures affect their activity, this daily cycle changes quite a bit over time. It is well known that cottonmouths, like most other pit vipers and many snakes from other families, prefer to be active at night rather than during the day, even if the temperatures aren't as favorable at night. This preference is linked to the higher nighttime activity of frogs and reptiles, which are their main food sources.

During spring and autumn, activity is more restricted to the day and long periods of basking occur. However, as hot weather approaches, basking occurs mainly in the morning and evening and activity becomes primarily nocturnal. But, in well shaded, moist forests, cottonmouths feed actively in the daytime.

During spring and autumn, activity is more limited to the daytime, with long periods of basking. However, as the hot weather sets in, basking mainly happens in the morning and evening, and activity shifts mostly to nighttime. In well-shaded, moist forests, though, cottonmouths can still be active and feed during the day.

Availability of food also has an important influence upon activity. Allen and Swindell (op. cit.:5) stated that moccasins congregate around drying ponds and feed on dying fish until the moccasins can hold no more. They then usually stay nearby as long as food remains. In an area of the Stephen F. Austin Experimental Forest near Nacogdoches, Texas, many cottonmouths journey daily to and from a swamp and a dry field, evidently to feed on rodents inhabiting the area. Ten individuals captured along a snake-proof fence that was built 30 yards from the swamp were found lying coiled along the fence after 4:30 p.m., at which time the area was shaded. On another occasion, I captured a large cottonmouth that was feeding upon dying fish in a drying pool about 10:30 a.m. on August 19, 1962.

Availability of food significantly impacts activity. Allen and Swindell (op. cit.:5) noted that moccasins gather around drying ponds to feast on dying fish until they can’t eat anymore. They typically remain nearby as long as food is available. In the Stephen F. Austin Experimental Forest near Nacogdoches, Texas, many cottonmouths travel daily between a swamp and a dry field, clearly to hunt rodents in the area. Ten individuals captured along a snake-proof fence built 30 yards from the swamp were found coiled along the fence after 4:30 p.m., when the area was shaded. On another occasion, I caught a large cottonmouth that was eating dying fish in a drying pool at about 10:30 a.m. on August 19, 1962.

Because of the aquatic habits of the cottonmouth, relative humidity probably has little influence on the snake's activity. However, cottonmouths are more restricted to the vicinity of water in dry weather than during rains or muggy weather when many of their natural prey species also move about more freely. Increased activity on cloudy days may result from protection from long exposure to sunshine. Torrential rains and floods, such as those following hurricanes along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts of the southeastern United States, bring out quantities of snakes of all species. Rattlesnakes and cottonmouths in particular are killed by the thousands at these times because they seek shelter in human habitations. However, these are unusual circumstances and do not reflect voluntary activity as a result of preferences.

Because cottonmouths live in water, humidity probably doesn’t affect their activity much. However, cottonmouths tend to stay closer to water during dry weather compared to when it rains or is humid, as many of their natural prey are also more active in those conditions. Increased activity on cloudy days might be due to avoiding too much sun exposure. Heavy rains and floods, especially after hurricanes along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts of the southeastern U.S., cause a surge in snake sightings across species. Rattlesnakes and cottonmouths, in particular, often get killed by the thousands during these times because they look for shelter in human homes. However, these situations are unusual and don’t reflect their normal preferences for activity.

Thermal reactions of reptiles were classified by Cowles and Bogert (1944) into several categories. For each species there is a basking and normal activity range limited by the voluntary minimum and voluntary maximum at which the animal seeks shelter. Beyond this normal range are the critical thermal minimum and critical thermal maximum (C. T. M.) at which effective locomotion is prevented. The lethal minimum and maximum are those temperatures at which short exposure produces irreparable damage, and death inevitably results. These classifications are modified somewhat by seasonal or laboratory acclimation or by the physiological state of the animal. The C. T. M. of five cottonmouths was determined by placing each individual in an enclosed area and heating it with an infrared lamp. Cloacal temperatures were taken with a Schultheis quick-recording thermometer as soon as the snake could no longer right itself when placed on its back. All temperatures were in degrees Celcius. The C. T. M. averaged 39.2° (38.0° to 40.0°). A temperature of 38.0° was lethal to one individual. These cottonmouths had [469] been in captivity for nine months. The behavior of the snakes during heating resembled those instances described by Klauber (1956:382-387) for rattlesnakes. As the body temperature of the snakes rose past the optimum, each individual became disturbed and tried to escape from the enclosure. The snakes soon became frantic in their efforts to escape. After about five minutes the mouth was opened and heavy, slow breathing was begun, accompanied by a loss of coordination and a slowing down of movements. The snakes writhed spasmodically for a few seconds and then lay still, usually with the mouth open. Recovery was begun by rolling on the belly and flicking the tongue, followed by movements of the head and then the body. Cottonmouths are rarely exposed to dangerously high temperatures owing to their semi-aquatic habits, but there are probably occasions when individuals reach the C. T. M. for the species.

Thermal reactions of reptiles were categorized by Cowles and Bogert (1944) into several groups. Each species has a range for basking and normal activity, defined by the voluntary minimum and voluntary maximum where the animal seeks shelter. Outside of this normal range are the critical thermal minimum and critical thermal maximum (C. T. M.) at which effective movement is hindered. The lethal minimum and maximum are the temperatures where brief exposure results in irreversible harm and death is unavoidable. These classifications are somewhat affected by seasonal or laboratory acclimatization or the animal's physiological condition. The C. T. M. of five cottonmouths was determined by placing each snake in a controlled area and heating it with an infrared lamp. Cloacal temperatures were recorded using a Schultheis quick-recording thermometer as soon as the snake could no longer right itself when flipped onto its back. All temperatures were measured in degrees Celsius. The C. T. M. averaged 39.2° (ranging from 38.0° to 40.0°). A temperature of 38.0° was fatal for one individual. These cottonmouths had [469] been in captivity for nine months. During heating, the snakes exhibited behaviors similar to those described by Klauber (1956:382-387) for rattlesnakes. As their body temperature increased beyond the optimal level, each snake became agitated and attempted to escape the enclosure. They quickly became desperate in their attempts to flee. After about five minutes, they began to open their mouths and breathe heavily and slowly, which was accompanied by a loss of coordination and a decrease in movement speed. The snakes thrashed spasmodically for a few seconds before lying still, often with their mouths open. Recovery started with rolling onto their bellies and flicking their tongues, followed by movements of their heads and then their bodies. Cottonmouths are seldom exposed to dangerously high temperatures due to their semi-aquatic lifestyle, but there may be times when individuals encounter the C. T. M. for the species.

Basking

Since activity, digestion, and gestation depend upon adequate internal temperatures, there must be a process by which these temperatures are attained and for an appropriate time maintained. Basking is important in this respect. The cottonmouths prefer to lie in a coiled position and, during basking, can usually be found beside bodies of water or on branches of dead trees overhanging the water. They are good climbers and have a prehensile tail that is frequently employed in descending from small branches. Since cottonmouths are semi-aquatic and are often exposed to temperatures that are lower than those of the air, they either must bask more often than terrestrial snakes or tolerate lower temperatures. Length of the period of basking is determined not only by amounts of insolation and temperature but also by the size of the snake. A smaller snake can reach its optimum temperature more rapidly because of a higher surface-to-volume ratio. Another factor that may play a minor role in the rate of temperature change is the color of the snake. The wide variation in color of cottonmouths probably affects rates of heat increase and loss due to direct radiation. Slight hormonal control of melanophores described in snakes by Neill and Allen (1955) also may exert some influence on the length of time spent basking. No rates of temperature increase or decrease are available for cottonmouths.

Since activity, digestion, and reproduction rely on maintaining the right internal temperatures, there has to be a way for these temperatures to be reached and kept for a suitable duration. Basking plays a crucial role here. Cottonmouths like to lie coiled up and are usually found basking next to water bodies or on branches of dead trees that hang over the water. They’re great climbers and have a prehensile tail that they often use to navigate down from small branches. Since cottonmouths are semi-aquatic and frequently encounter cooler temperatures than the air, they either need to bask more often than land snakes or adapt to lower temperatures. The duration of basking depends not just on how much sunlight and warmth is available but also on the size of the snake. A smaller snake can heat up to its ideal temperature quicker because it has a higher surface-to-volume ratio. Another factor that might slightly influence the rate at which temperature changes is the snake’s color. The wide range of colors in cottonmouths likely impacts how quickly they gain or lose heat through direct sunlight. Additionally, slight hormonal control of pigment cells, as discussed by Neill and Allen (1955), could also affect the duration of basking. There are no available measurements for how quickly cottonmouths' temperatures rise or fall.

Coiling

While inactive the cottonmouth spends most of its time lying in a coiled position with the tail outermost, with the body usually wound into about one and one-half cycles, and the head and neck in a reversed direction forming a U- or S-shaped loop. From this position the snake is able to make a short strike or a hasty getaway if necessary. In my opinion this position is used primarily for basking or resting and only secondarily for feeding. Most individuals appear to pursue their prey actively, not lying in ambush for the approaching prey to the extent that most other crotalids do.

While inactive, the cottonmouth mostly lies coiled up with its tail at the outermost end, its body typically twisted into about one and a half loops, while its head and neck are turned back in a U- or S-shaped loop. From this position, the snake can quickly strike or make a fast escape if needed. I believe this position is mainly for basking or resting, with feeding being a secondary reason. Most cottonmouths seem to actively pursue their prey rather than ambushing it like most other pit vipers do.

Many of the cottonmouths that I kept in captivity were observed in a coiled position for periods up to three or four days. Under natural conditions, however, they are more active. Young cottonmouths are inclined to remain in a coiled position for longer periods than older individuals.

Many of the cottonmouths I kept in captivity were seen coiled up for three to four days at a time. However, in the wild, they tend to be more active. Young cottonmouths tend to stay coiled for longer than older ones.

Locomotion

Four distinct types of locomotion have been described in snakes: horizontal undulatory, rectilinear, sidewinding, and concertina (Klauber, 1956: 331-350). Most snakes are capable of employing two or more of these types of progression, at least to a certain degree; but horizontal undulatory locomotion is the most common method used by the majority of snakes, including the cottonmouth. In this method the snake's body is thrown into lateral undulations that conform with irregularities in the substrate. Pressure is exerted on the outside and posterior surface of each curve, thus forcing the body forward.

Four distinct types of movement have been identified in snakes: horizontal undulatory, rectilinear, sidewinding, and concertina (Klauber, 1956: 331-350). Most snakes can use two or more of these methods of movement to some extent; however, horizontal undulatory locomotion is the most common way for most snakes, including the cottonmouth. In this method, the snake's body moves in lateral waves that adapt to the surface it is on. Pressure is applied to the outside and back of each curve, pushing the body forward.

Rectilinear locomotion is more useful to large, thick-bodied snakes which use this method of progression, chiefly when they are prowling and unhurried. This method depends upon the movement of alternate sections of the venter forward and drawing the body over the ventral scales resting on the substratum by means of muscular action. This mode of locomotion was most frequently observed in captive cottonmouths when they were crawling along the edge of their cages, especially when they were first introduced to the cages and toward the end of the shedding process. The other two types of locomotion, sidewinding and concertina, have not, to my knowledge, been observed in the cottonmouth.

Rectilinear movement is more advantageous for larger, thick-bodied snakes that use this method mainly when they are moving slowly and deliberately. This technique relies on the movement of alternate sections of the belly pushing forward and pulling the body over the belly scales resting on the ground through muscular actions. This type of movement was most often seen in captive cottonmouths when they were crawling along the edges of their cages, particularly when they were first placed in the cages and towards the end of the shedding process. As far as I know, the other two types of movement, sidewinding and concertina, have not been observed in the cottonmouth.

Both the cottonmouth and the cantil have definite affinities for water and are as likely to be found in water as out of it. Copperheads and rattlesnakes, although not aquatic, are good swimmers. When swimming, a motion resembling horizontal undulatory progression is used.

Both the cottonmouth and the cantil definitely prefer water and are just as likely to be found in it as out of it. Copperheads and rattlesnakes, while not aquatic, are strong swimmers. When swimming, they use a motion that looks like a horizontal wave-like movement.

Disposition

The number of different opinions expressed in the literature concerning the cottonmouth's disposition is not at all surprising. As with any species there is a wide range of individual temperament, which is affected by many factors. The cottonmouth is considered by some writers to be docile while others consider it to be highly dangerous. Allen and Swindell (1948:7) described the variability in temperament, even among individuals. They wrote: "On rare occasions, moccasins are found which will attack. A perfectly docile snake will turn and bite viciously without any apparent reason." They also recounted a case in which a cottonmouth was kept as a pet for six years, being allowed the freedom of the house. Smith and List (1955:123) found them "... surprisingly docile in the gulf region [Mississippi], displaying none of the pugnacity of more northern cottonmouths." Smith (1956:310) stated: "Unlike the copperhead, cottonmouths are pugnacious; their powerful jaws, long fangs, vicious disposition and potent venom make them a very dangerous animal."

The variety of opinions about the cottonmouth's behavior is not surprising at all. Like any species, there’s a broad range of individual temperaments influenced by various factors. Some authors view the cottonmouth as docile, while others see it as very dangerous. Allen and Swindell (1948:7) noted the differences in temperament, even among individuals. They wrote: "On rare occasions, moccasins are found that will attack. A perfectly docile snake can suddenly bite viciously without any obvious reason." They also mentioned a case where a cottonmouth was kept as a pet for six years, enjoying free roam in the house. Smith and List (1955:123) observed them as "... surprisingly docile in the gulf region [Mississippi], showing none of the aggressiveness of more northern cottonmouths." Smith (1956:310) remarked: "Unlike the copperhead, cottonmouths are aggressive; their strong jaws, long fangs, aggressive nature, and potent venom make them a very dangerous animal."

My own observations are in general agreement with the statements of Allen and Swindell (loc. cit.). In my encounters with cottonmouths, I have never found any aggressive individuals except for three juveniles that were born in captivity. In their first three days in the laboratory these juveniles were observed to strike repeatedly whenever anyone entered the room. After this short period of aggressiveness, however, they slowly became more docile. The disposition shown by the newborn young is clearly an innate behavioral pattern that undoubtedly has a direct relationship to survival. The majority of cottonmouths [471] that I have approached in the field have moved swiftly to seek refuge in nearby water; a few have remained motionless as I approached, and one showed the typical threat display. Upon capture and handling, they react similarly to other pit-vipers by opening and closing the mouth and erecting the fangs in an attempt to bite. They often bite through the lower jaw and eject venom at this time as well as when the mouth is open. Of more than a dozen individuals kept in captivity, four were particularly difficult to handle whereas another was extremely docile. It was almost never found in aggregations with the other snakes and did not struggle or attempt to bite when handled. The majority remained unpredictable in disposition, usually appearing docile and lazy but capable of extremely rapid movements when disturbed.

My observations generally match what Allen and Swindell (loc. cit.) have said. In my experiences with cottonmouths, I’ve never seen any aggressive ones, except for three juveniles that were born in captivity. During their first three days in the lab, these juveniles repeatedly struck whenever someone entered the room. After that brief period of aggression, they gradually became more docile. The behavior shown by the newborns is clearly an innate pattern that is closely linked to survival. Most of the cottonmouths [471] I approached in the wild quickly sought refuge in nearby water; a few stayed still as I got closer, and one displayed typical threat behavior. When captured and handled, they reacted like other pit vipers, opening and closing their mouths and raising their fangs to bite. They often bite through the lower jaw and release venom, both when the mouth is open and during biting. Of more than a dozen individuals kept in captivity, four were particularly difficult to handle, while one was extremely docile. It was almost never found with the other snakes and didn’t struggle or try to bite when handled. The majority remained unpredictable, usually appearing lazy and docile but capable of very quick movements when disturbed.

Defense and Escape

The typical threatening posture of rattlesnakes is all but lacking in the cottonmouth, which relies primarily on concealing coloration or nearness to water for escape. When approached, it usually plunges into nearby water or remains motionless with the head held up at a 45° angle and the mouth opened widely exposing the white interior. The tail is sometimes vibrated rapidly and musk is expelled. This threat display is unique to cottonmouths; although it does not attract as much attention as the display of rattlesnakes, it is probably an effective warning to most intruders at close range.

The typical threatening posture of rattlesnakes is almost nonexistent in cottonmouths, which mainly rely on their camouflage or proximity to water to escape. When approached, they usually dive into nearby water or stay completely still, holding their heads up at a 45° angle with their mouths wide open to reveal the white inside. Their tails may also vibrate quickly, and they expel musk. This threat display is unique to cottonmouths; while it doesn't draw as much attention as rattlesnake displays, it's likely an effective warning to most intruders nearby.

Neill (1947:205) reported one case in which a cottonmouth used the "body blow" defense, described for Crotalus by Cowles (1938:13), when approached by a king-snake, Lampropeltis getulus. In this unusual posture the anterior and posterior portions of the body are held against the ground and the middle one-fourth to one-third of the body is lifted up and used in striking the intruder. This same defense posture also was observed in rattlesnakes when presented with the odor of the spotted skunk, Spilogale phenax. However, the "king-snake defense posture" is probably not a well-established behavioral pattern in the cottonmouth, for it sometimes feeds upon king-snakes. I observed the killing and devouring of a cottonmouth by a speckled king-snake, L. g. holbrooki; the only attempts to escape were by rapid crawling and biting.

Neill (1947:205) reported a case where a cottonmouth used the "body blow" defense, which Cowles (1938:13) described for Crotalus, when approached by a kingsnake, Lampropeltis getulus. In this unique position, the front and back parts of the body are pressed against the ground while the middle one-fourth to one-third of the body is raised up and used to strike at the intruder. This same defensive posture was also seen in rattlesnakes when they detected the scent of the spotted skunk, Spilogale phenax. However, the "kingsnake defense posture" is likely not a consistent behavior in the cottonmouth, as it occasionally preys on kingsnakes. I witnessed a speckled kingsnake, L. g. holbrooki, killing and swallowing a cottonmouth; the only escape attempts made by the cottonmouth were rapid crawling and biting.

Cottonmouths often squirt musk as a defensive action. The tail is switched back and forth, and musk is emitted from glands on each side of the base of the tail. The fine jets of musk are sprayed upward at about 45° angles for a distance of nearly five feet. How often this defense mechanism is used against other animals is not known, but the musky odor can frequently be detected in areas where cottonmouths are common. The odor is repulsive and, if concentrated, can cause nausea in some individuals. To me, the scent is indistinguishable from that of the copperhead.

Cottonmouths often spray musk as a defense mechanism. They move their tails back and forth, releasing musk from glands on either side of the base of their tails. The fine jets of musk shoot upward at about a 45° angle, reaching nearly five feet. It's unclear how often this defense is used against other animals, but the musky smell can often be noticed in areas where cottonmouths are common. The odor is unpleasant and, if it's strong enough, can make some people feel nauseous. To me, the scent is indistinguishable from that of the copperhead.

"Head Bobbing"

"Head bobbing" in snakes has been described frequently in the literature, and many interpretations have been advanced to explain its occurrence. One of the earlier accounts was that of Corrington (1929:72) describing behavior of the corn snake, Elaphe guttata. Characteristic bobbing occurred when the snake was cornered, and seemingly the purpose was to warn or frighten foes. Neill (1949:114-115) mentioned the jerking or bobbing of the head in several species of snakes including the cottonmouth, and remarked that "it is apparently [472] connected with courtship and with the recognition of individuals." According to Munro (1950:88), "head bobbing" appears to be a sign of annoyance in some instances but is usually concerned with reproduction and individual recognition. Richmond (1952:38) thought that many types of head movements among not only reptiles but also birds and some mammals are a result of poor vision and serve "to delimit and orient an object that for lack of motion is otherwise invisible." Head movements undoubtedly occur in animals to facilitate accommodation, but it is obvious from Richmond's conclusions that he has never observed "head bobbing" in snakes. The term itself is grossly misleading and should be discarded. Mansueti (1946:98) correctly described the movements as spastic contractions of the body. I have observed numerous instances of these movements in cottonmouths, copperheads, and rat snakes (Elaphe obsoleta); and in no case has the movement resembled a head bob as is described in lizards and other animals. The movement appears to be a result of a nervous or sexually excited state and consists of highly spastic contractions confined to the anterior part of the snake most of the time but affecting the entire body on some occasions.

"Head bobbing" in snakes has been frequently discussed in the literature, and many explanations have been put forward to understand its occurrence. One of the earlier accounts was by Corrington (1929:72), who described the behavior of the corn snake, Elaphe guttata. The characteristic bobbing happened when the snake was cornered, and it seemed to serve the purpose of warning or scaring off enemies. Neill (1949:114-115) mentioned the jerking or bobbing of the head in several species of snakes, including the cottonmouth, and noted that "it is apparently [472] connected with courtship and with the recognition of individuals." According to Munro (1950:88), "head bobbing" seems to be a sign of annoyance in some cases but is mostly related to reproduction and recognizing individuals. Richmond (1952:38) believed that many types of head movements not only in reptiles but also in birds and some mammals result from poor vision and serve "to delimit and orient an object that for lack of motion is otherwise invisible." Head movements certainly occur in animals to help with adjustment, but it's clear from Richmond's conclusions that he has never actually observed "head bobbing" in snakes. The term itself is quite misleading and should be discarded. Mansueti (1946:98) accurately described the movements as spastic contractions of the body. I have witnessed numerous instances of these movements in cottonmouths, copperheads, and rat snakes (Elaphe obsoleta); and in no case did the movement resemble a head bob like that described in lizards and other animals. The movement seems to result from a nervous or sexually excited state and consists of highly spastic contractions primarily in the front part of the snake, though it can affect the entire body at times.

I found the response to be most common among cottonmouths in confinement when food was introduced to a cage containing several individuals (increasing the tendency to strike at a moving object) and when an individual was placed back in the cage after being handled. At these times the snakes that were inactive began to jerk for a few seconds. When the snake is in this seemingly nervous state, the same response is elicited by another snake crawling over it. At other times the movement of one individual causes no such response. The jerking movements appear to be released by the recognition of a nervous state in another individual and may serve to protect the jerking individual from aggressive advances of the former.

I found that this reaction was most common among cottonmouths in captivity when food was brought into a cage with several snakes (which made them more likely to strike at a moving object) and when a snake was returned to the cage after being handled. During these moments, the inactive snakes began to twitch for a few seconds. When a snake is in this seemingly anxious state, it reacts to another snake crawling over it. At other times, the movement of one snake doesn't trigger any response. The twitching seems to be triggered by sensing another snake's anxiety and may help protect the twitching snake from aggressive behavior from the other.

Where courtship is involved, the jerking motions are made in conjunction with writhing of the male and do not result from the same type of releaser described above.

Where courtship is involved, the sudden movements happen alongside the twisting of the male and don't come from the same type of trigger mentioned earlier.

Combat Dance

The so-called combat dance between male snakes has long been known, but its significance is still poorly understood. It was for many years believed to be courtship behavior until the participants were examined and found to be males. Carr and Carr (1942:1-6) described one such instance in two cottonmouths as courtship. In their observations, as well as those of others, copulation was never observed following the "dance" but was assumed to be the ultimate goal. After the discovery that only males participated, it was suggested that combat involved competition for mates, but the "dance" has been observed at times other than the breeding season (Ramsey, 1948:228).

The so-called combat dance between male snakes has been known for a long time, but its significance is still not well understood. For many years, it was thought to be a courtship behavior until it was discovered that the participants were all males. Carr and Carr (1942:1-6) described one instance involving two cottonmouths as courtship. In their observations, along with those of others, copulation was never seen after the "dance," but it was assumed that it was the ultimate goal. After finding out that only males took part, it was suggested that this combat involved competition for mates, but the "dance" has been observed at times outside of the breeding season (Ramsey, 1948:228).

Shaw (1948:137-145) discussed the combat of crotalids in some detail but drew no conclusions as to the cause of the behavior. Lowe (1948:134) concluded with little actual evidence that combat among male snakes is solely for territorial purposes. Shaw (1951:167) stated that combat may occur as a possible defense against homosexuality. One case of homosexual mating among cottonmouths was reported (Lederer, 1931:651-653), but the incomplete description seems to be of normal courtship procedure except that the "female" tried to avoid the male. Two instances of combat observed between timber rattlesnakes (C. h. horridus) by Sutherland (1958:23-24) were definitely [473] initiated because of competition for food. More observations are needed before the significance of the combat can be fully understood.

Shaw (1948:137-145) talked about how rattlesnakes fight in detail, but he didn’t come to any conclusions about why they do it. Lowe (1948:134) concluded with little real evidence that male snakes fight primarily for territory. Shaw (1951:167) suggested that combat might happen as a potential defense against homosexuality. One instance of homosexual mating among cottonmouths was reported (Lederer, 1931:651-653), but the incomplete description seems to reflect normal courtship behavior, except that the "female" was trying to get away from the male. Two cases of combat observed between timber rattlesnakes (C. h. horridus) by Sutherland (1958:23-24) were clearly [473] triggered by competition for food. More observations are needed to fully understand the significance of the fighting.


THE VENOM

Properties of the Venom

The venom and poison apparatus have developed primarily as a means of causing rapid death in small animals that are the usual prey. As a protective device against larger enemies, including man, the venom may have some value; but this was probably unimportant in the evolution of the poison mechanism. A secondary function of the venom is to begin digestion of tissues of the prey. Since food is swallowed whole, injection of digestive enzymes into the body cavity enhances digestion of the prey.

The venom and poison system have mainly evolved to quickly kill small animals that are typically prey. While it may offer some protection against larger threats, including humans, this aspect likely wasn't significant in the development of the poison mechanism. Another role of the venom is to kickstart the digestion of the prey's tissues. Since food is swallowed whole, injecting digestive enzymes into the body cavity helps improve the digestion process.

Kellogg (1925:5) described venom as a somewhat viscid fluid of a yellowish color and composed of 50 to 70 per cent proteins, the chief remaining components being water and carbohydrates, with occasional admixtures of abraded epithelial cells or saprophytic microorganisms. Salts, such as chlorides, phosphates of calcium, magnesium, and ammonium, occur in small quantities. Each of the components of snake venom has a different effect on the body of the victim. It was at first believed that there were two types of venoms: neurotoxic, which acts upon nervous tissue; and haemotoxic, which acts on blood and other tissues. It has since been found that venoms are composed of varying mixtures of both types. Fairley (1929:301) described the constituents of venom as: (1) neurotoxic elements that act on the bulbar and spinal ganglion cells of the central nervous system; (2) hemorrhagins that destroy the lining of the walls of blood vessels; (3) thrombose, producing clots within blood vessels; (4) hemolysins, destroying red blood corpuscles; (5) cytolysins that act on leucocytes and on cells of other tissues; (6) elements that retard coagulation of the blood; (7) antibactericidal substances; and (8) ferments that prepare food for pancreatic digestion. Elapid snakes tend to have more of elements 1, 4, and 6 in their venoms, while viperids and crotalids, of which the cottonmouth is one, have higher quantities of elements 2, 3, and 5. Kellogg (loc. cit.) stated that venom of cottonmouths contains more neurotoxin than that of rattlesnakes and not only breaks down the nuclei of ganglion cells but also produces granular disintegration of the myelin sheath and fragmentation of the conducting portions of nerve fibers.

Kellogg (1925:5) described venom as a thick, yellowish fluid made up of 50 to 70 percent proteins, with the main other components being water and carbohydrates, along with occasional bits of damaged epithelial cells or decaying microorganisms. There are small amounts of salts like chlorides, phosphates of calcium, magnesium, and ammonium present. Each component of snake venom affects the victim's body differently. Initially, it was thought that there were two types of venom: neurotoxic, which affects nervous tissue, and haemotoxic, which affects blood and other tissues. It has since been discovered that venoms consist of various mixtures of both types. Fairley (1929:301) identified the components of venom as: (1) neurotoxic elements that impact the bulbar and spinal ganglion cells of the central nervous system; (2) hemorrhagins that damage the lining of blood vessel walls; (3) thrombose, which causes blood clots; (4) hemolysins, which destroy red blood cells; (5) cytolysins that act on white blood cells and other tissue cells; (6) substances that slow down blood coagulation; (7) antibactericidal agents; and (8) enzymes that help with pancreatic digestion. Elapid snakes usually have more of elements 1, 4, and 6 in their venom, while viperids and crotalids, including the cottonmouth, have higher levels of elements 2, 3, and 5. Kellogg (loc. cit.) noted that the venom of cottonmouths contains more neurotoxin than that of rattlesnakes and not only damages the nuclei of ganglion cells but also causes granular breakdown of the myelin sheath and fragmentation of the nerve fibers' conducting parts.

Thus, venoms contain both toxic elements and non-toxic substances that promote rapid spreading of the venom through the body of the victim. Jacques (1956:291) attributed this rapid spreading to the hyaluronidase content of venoms.

Thus, venoms contain both toxic elements and non-toxic substances that help the venom spread quickly throughout the victim's body. Jacques (1956:291) attributed this rapid spreading to the hyaluronidase content of venoms.

Venom Yield and Toxicity

One of the most important yet undeterminable factors of the gravity of snakebite is the amount of venom injected into the victim. Since this volume varies considerably in every bite, attempts have been made to determine the amount and toxicity of venom produced by each species of poisonous snake. Individual yield is so variable that a large number of snakes must be milked in order to determine the average yield. Even then there remains an uncertainty as to how this amount may compare with that injected by a biting snake.

One of the most important but unpredictable factors in the seriousness of a snakebite is how much venom is injected into the victim. Since this amount can vary greatly with each bite, efforts have been made to measure the amount and toxicity of venom produced by different species of venomous snakes. The individual yield varies so much that a significant number of snakes need to be milked to determine an average yield. Even then, there is still uncertainty about how this amount compares to what a biting snake actually injects.

Wolff and Githens (1939b:234) made 16 venom extractions from a group [474] of cottonmouths in a two-year period. The average yield per snake fluctuated between 80 and 237 milligrams (actual weight), and toxicity measured as the minimum lethal dose for pigeons varied from 0.05 to 0.16 milligrams (dry weight). No decrease in yield or toxicity was evident during this period. Another group of cottonmouths from which venom was extracted over a period of five years also showed no decrease in yield or toxicity. Of 315 individual extractions the average amount obtained from each individual was 0.55 cubic centimeters of liquid or 0.158 grams of dried venom (28.0 per cent solids). The minimum lethal dosage (M. L. D.) which was determined by injecting intravenously into 350-gram pigeons was found to be 0.09 milligrams (dry weight). Each snake carried approximately 1755 M. L. D.'s of venom.

Wolff and Githens (1939b:234) collected 16 venom samples from a group [474] of cottonmouths over a two-year period. The average amount per snake ranged between 80 and 237 milligrams (actual weight), and the toxicity, measured as the minimum lethal dose for pigeons, varied from 0.05 to 0.16 milligrams (dry weight). There was no noticeable drop in yield or toxicity during this time. Another group of cottonmouths, from which venom was extracted over five years, also showed no reduction in yield or toxicity. Out of 315 individual extractions, the average amount obtained from each was 0.55 cubic centimeters of liquid or 0.158 grams of dried venom (28.0 percent solids). The minimum lethal dosage (M. L. D.) determined by injecting 350-gram pigeons intravenously was found to be 0.09 milligrams (dry weight). Each snake contained roughly 1755 M. L. D.'s of venom.

The record venom extraction for the cottonmouth was 4.0 cubic centimeters (1.094 grams dried venom) taken from a five-foot snake which had been in captivity for 11 weeks and milked five weeks earlier (Wolff and Githens, 1939a:52). The average yield of venom of cottonmouths is about three times the average yield reported for copperheads by Fitch (1960:256), a difference correlated with the greater bulk and relatively large head of the cottonmouth.

The highest recorded venom extraction from a cottonmouth was 4.0 cubic centimeters (1.094 grams of dried venom) taken from a five-foot snake that had been in captivity for 11 weeks and was milked five weeks prior (Wolff and Githens, 1939a:52). The average yield of venom from cottonmouths is about three times that of copperheads, as reported by Fitch (1960:256), which is connected to the larger size and relatively bigger head of the cottonmouth.

Allen and Swindell (1948:13) stated that cottonmouth venom rates third in potency, compared drop for drop to that of Micrurus fulvius and Crotalus adamanteus. Freshly dried cottonmouth venom tested on young white rats showed the lethal dose to be from 23 to 29 milligrams per kilogram of body weight. The venom of 11 one-week-old cottonmouths was found to be more potent than that of adult males. Githens (1935:171) rated C. adamanteus venom as being weaker than that of the copperhead (A. contortrix), which he rated only slightly lower than cottonmouth venom. The crotalids which he ranked more toxic than cottonmouths are: the Pacific rattlesnake (C. viridis oreganus) and the massasauga (S. catenatus). He found A. bilineatus, C. durissus, and C. v. lutosus to have the same toxicity as cottonmouths. Minton (1953:214) found that the intraperitoneal "lethal dose 50" (the dose capable of killing half the experimental mice receiving injections of it) was 6.36 milligrams per kilogram for copperheads. However, in later publications Minton (1954:1079; 1956:146) reported that the "lethal dose 50" for copperheads was 25.65 milligrams. Approximately the same potency was determined for cottonmouths. Several rattlesnakes that he tested showed a higher toxicity than copperheads or cottonmouths.

Allen and Swindell (1948:13) indicated that cottonmouth venom is the third most potent, drop for drop, compared to that of Micrurus fulvius and Crotalus adamanteus. Tests on freshly dried cottonmouth venom using young white rats revealed that the lethal dose ranged from 23 to 29 milligrams per kilogram of body weight. The venom from 11 one-week-old cottonmouths was found to be more potent than that of adult males. Githens (1935:171) assessed C. adamanteus venom as weaker than that of the copperhead (A. contortrix), which he rated only slightly below cottonmouth venom. The crotalids that he considered more toxic than cottonmouths include the Pacific rattlesnake (C. viridis oreganus) and the massasauga (S. catenatus). He found A. bilineatus, C. durissus, and C. v. lutosus to have the same toxicity as cottonmouths. Minton (1953:214) discovered that the intraperitoneal "lethal dose 50" (the dose capable of killing half the experimental mice receiving injections) was 6.36 milligrams per kilogram for copperheads. However, in later publications, Minton (1954:1079; 1956:146) reported that the "lethal dose 50" for copperheads was 25.65 milligrams. Approximately the same potency was found for cottonmouths. Several rattlesnakes he tested exhibited a higher toxicity than copperheads or cottonmouths.

Criley (1956:378) found the venom of copperheads to be 6.95, nearer Minton's earlier estimate, and rated cottonmouth venom as being twice as toxic as that of copperheads. The relative toxicities of other crotalids tested, considering the cottonmouth to be one unit, were: C. basiliscus, 0.3; A. contortrix, 0.5; C. viridis oreganus, 1.4; A. bilineatus, 2.2; C. adamanteus, 2.3; C. v. viridis, 3.2; C. durissus terrificus, 27.5.

Criley (1956:378) found that the venom of copperheads had a toxicity level of 6.95, which is closer to Minton's earlier estimate, and determined that cottonmouth venom is twice as toxic as that of copperheads. The relative toxicities of other studied crotalids, with the cottonmouth rated as one unit, were: C. basiliscus, 0.3; A. contortrix, 0.5; C. viridis oreganus, 1.4; A. bilineatus, 2.2; C. adamanteus, 2.3; C. v. viridis, 3.2; C. durissus terrificus, 27.5.

It can be seen from the above examples that toxicity of venoms and the resistance of the animal receiving an injection of venom is highly variable. Possibly the venom of each species of snake has greatest effect on animals of the particular group relied on for food by the snake. If that is so, the venom of cottonmouths would be expected to be more toxic when tested on fish, reptiles, and amphibians than on birds and mammals. Likewise, the venom of most species of rattlesnakes would be expected to be more virulent when injected into mammals than when injected into lower vertebrates. But, according to Netting (1929:108), species of rattlesnakes that prey on cold-blooded [475] animals, which are less susceptible to venoms than warm-blooded animals, are thought to have highly toxic venoms. This explanation accounts for the powerful venom of Sistrurus catenatus; and, in this respect, venom of cottonmouths should be highly toxic also. However, no clear-cut trends have been shown in most cases. Allen (1937) injected 250-gram guinea pigs with 4 milligrams of venom of various poisonous snakes. Survival time was recorded in order to indicate the relative potency of the venoms. Of 16 such tests C. adamanteus held places 1, 2, 3, 12, and 16; Bothrops atrox held places 4, 9, 10, and 13; and A. piscivorus held places 5, 7, 8, and 15. Places 6, 11, and 14 were held by three individuals of different species. No relationship to size or sex was indicated by the results of this experiment.

From the examples above, it's clear that the toxicity of venoms and the resistance of animals receiving venom injections vary greatly. It's possible that the venom from each snake species affects the specific group of animals they typically prey on the most. If that's the case, you'd expect the venom from cottonmouths to be more toxic to fish, reptiles, and amphibians than to birds and mammals. Similarly, the venom from most species of rattlesnakes would likely be more harmful to mammals than to lower vertebrates. However, according to Netting (1929:108), species of rattlesnakes that hunt cold-blooded animals— which are less vulnerable to venoms than warm-blooded ones—are believed to have very toxic venoms. This explains the strong venom of Sistrurus catenatus; and in this regard, the venom of cottonmouths should also be highly toxic. Nevertheless, no clear patterns have emerged in most cases. Allen (1937) injected 250-gram guinea pigs with 4 milligrams of venom from various poisonous snakes and recorded their survival times to assess the relative potency of the venoms. In 16 tests, C. adamanteus ranked 1, 2, 3, 12, and 16; Bothrops atrox ranked 4, 9, 10, and 13; and A. piscivorus ranked 5, 7, 8, and 15. Positions 6, 11, and 14 were held by three individuals from different species. The results of this experiment showed no relationship to size or sex.

Susceptibility of Snakes

Numerous experiments have been conducted to determine the susceptibility of various snakes to venom. The majority of these experiments were performed to learn whether or not venomous snakes were immune to their own poison. Conant (1934:382) reported on a 30-inch cottonmouth that killed two Pacific rattlesnakes and another cottonmouth. One rattlesnake was bitten on the tail and the other on or near the head and partially swallowed. Gloyd (1933:13-14) recorded fatal effects to a rattlesnake from the bite of a cottonmouth. He also reported on the observations of three other crotalids bitten by themselves or other snakes, from which no harmful effects were observed. Allen (1937) injected several snakes with dried cottonmouth venom which was diluted with distilled water just before each injection. Four cottonmouths receiving 9, 18, 19, and 20 milligrams of venom per ounce of body weight survived, while another receiving 18.7 milligrams per ounce died after three hours. A specimen of S. miliarius receiving 8.3 milligrams per ounce died in about ten hours, while a C. durissus receiving 12.5 milligrams per ounce succumbed in 45 minutes. An alligator receiving 6 milligrams per ounce died in 14 hours. Even the snakes that survived showed some degree of swelling.

Numerous experiments have been conducted to determine how susceptible various snakes are to venom. Most of these experiments aimed to find out if venomous snakes are immune to their own poison. Conant (1934:382) reported on a 30-inch cottonmouth that killed two Pacific rattlesnakes and another cottonmouth. One rattlesnake was bitten on the tail, and the other on or near the head and was partially swallowed. Gloyd (1933:13-14) recorded fatal effects on a rattlesnake from a cottonmouth's bite. He also mentioned three other crotalids that were bitten by themselves or other snakes, which showed no harmful effects. Allen (1937) injected several snakes with dried cottonmouth venom that had been diluted with distilled water just before each injection. Four cottonmouths that received 9, 18, 19, and 20 milligrams of venom per ounce of body weight survived, while another that received 18.7 milligrams per ounce died after three hours. A specimen of S. miliarius that received 8.3 milligrams per ounce died in about ten hours, while a C. durissus that received 12.5 milligrams per ounce died in 45 minutes. An alligator that received 6 milligrams per ounce died in 14 hours. Even the snakes that survived showed some swelling.

The studies of Keegan and Andrews (1942:252) show that king-snakes are sometimes killed by poisonous snakes. A Lampropeltis calligaster injected with A. contortrix venom (0.767 milligrams per gram) died five days following the injection. This amount was more than twice the amount of A. piscivorus venom injected into a L. getulus by Allen (1937) in which the snake showed no ill effects. Keegan and Andrews (loc. cit.) stated that success in overpowering and eating poisonous snakes by Lampropeltis and Drymarchon may be due to the ability to avoid bites rather than to immunity to the venom. However, Rosenfeld and Glass (1940) demonstrated that the plasma of L. g. getulus had an inhibiting effect on the hemorrhagic action on mice of the venoms of several vipers.

The studies by Keegan and Andrews (1942:252) show that king snakes are sometimes killed by venomous snakes. A Lampropeltis calligaster injected with A. contortrix venom (0.767 milligrams per gram) died five days after the injection. This amount was more than double the dosage of A. piscivorus venom injected into a L. getulus by Allen (1937), in which the snake showed no adverse effects. Keegan and Andrews (loc. cit.) stated that the ability of Lampropeltis and Drymarchon to successfully overpower and eat venomous snakes may be due to their skill in avoiding bites rather than having immunity to the venom. However, Rosenfeld and Glass (1940) showed that the plasma of L. g. getulus had an inhibiting effect on the hemorrhagic action of several viper venoms on mice.

One of the more extensive studies on effects of venoms on snakes is that by Swanson (1946:242-249). In his studies freshly extracted liquid venom was used. His studies indicated that snakes are not immune to venom of their own kind or to closely related species. Copperhead venom killed copperheads faster than did other venoms but took more time to kill massasaugas, cottonmouths, and timber rattlers. However, most of the snakes were able to survive normal or average doses of venom although they are not necessarily immune to it.

One of the most extensive studies on the effects of venoms on snakes is by Swanson (1946:242-249). In his studies, freshly extracted liquid venom was used. His research showed that snakes are not immune to the venom of their own species or closely related ones. Copperhead venom killed copperheads faster than other venoms, but it took longer to kill massasaugas, cottonmouths, and timber rattlers. However, most of the snakes were able to survive normal or average doses of venom, although they are not necessarily immune to it.

One of the major problems in comparing the data on toxicity of venom in studies of this type is that no standard method of estimating toxicity has been used. Swanson's (loc. cit.) amount of venom equalling one minim (M.L.D.?) ranged from 0.058 to 0.065 cubic centimeters. There were no different values given for each species, but the time that elapsed from injection of the venom to death represented the toxicity. There also was no attempt in his study to convert the amount of venom used into a ratio of the volume of venom per weight of snake, making the results somewhat difficult to interpret. Additional work in this field should provide for many injections into many individuals of several size classes. The studies to date have been on far too few individuals to allow statistical analyses to be accurate.

One of the major issues when comparing the data on venom toxicity in studies like this is that there hasn't been a standard method for estimating toxicity. Swanson's (loc. cit.) amount of venom equating to one minim (M.L.D.?) varied from 0.058 to 0.065 cubic centimeters. There weren't different values provided for each species, but the time between the venom injection and death indicated the toxicity. His study also didn't attempt to convert the amount of venom used into a ratio of venom volume per weight of snake, which makes the results a bit hard to interpret. Future research in this area should involve multiple injections across various individuals of different sizes. So far, the studies have been conducted on way too few individuals to make accurate statistical analyses.


THE BITE

Effects of the Bite

Factors determining the outcome of snakebite are: size, health, and species of snake; individual variation of venom toxicity of the species; age and size of the victim; allergic or immune responses; location of the bite; and the amount of venom injected and the depth to which it is injected. The last factor is one of the most variable, owing to (1) character and thickness of clothing between the snake and the victim's skin, (2) accuracy of the snake's strike, and (3) size of the snake, since a large snake can deliver more venom and at a greater depth than can a small snake.

Factors that determine the outcome of a snakebite include: the size, health, and species of the snake; the individual variation in venom toxicity among species; the age and size of the victim; allergic or immune responses; the location of the bite; and the amount and depth of venom injected. The last factor is the most variable, due to (1) the type and thickness of clothing between the snake and the victim's skin, (2) the accuracy of the snake's strike, and (3) the size of the snake, as larger snakes can deliver more venom and inject it deeper than smaller snakes.

Pope and Perkins (1944) demonstrated that pit-vipers of the United States bite as effectively as most innocuous snakes and that a careful study of the bite may reveal the location of the pocket of venom, size of the snake, and possibly its generic identity (see Dentition). The bite pattern of the cottonmouth as well as the other crotalids showed the typical fang punctures plus punctures of teeth on both the pterygoid and mandible. Even so, a varying picture may be presented because from one to four fang marks may be present. At times in the fang-shedding cycle three and even four fangs can be in operation simultaneously.

Pope and Perkins (1944) showed that pit vipers in the United States bite just as effectively as most harmless snakes, and a detailed examination of the bite can reveal the location of the venom pocket, the size of the snake, and possibly its species (see Dentition). The bite pattern of the cottonmouth and other crotalids displayed the usual fang punctures as well as punctures from teeth on both the pterygoid and mandible. However, the picture can vary since there can be anywhere from one to four fang marks. Sometimes, during the fang-shedding cycle, three or even four fangs can be in use at the same time.

Various authors have attributed death of the prey to the following causes: paralysis of the central nervous system, paralysis of the respiratory center, asphyxiation from clotting of the blood, stoppage of the heart, urine suppression due to crystallized hemoglobin in the kidney tubules, dehydration of the body following edema in the area of the bite, or tissue damage. Mouths of snakes are reservoirs for infectious bacteria, which are especially prolific in damaged tissue. Bacterial growth is aided by the venom which blocks the bactericidal power of the blood.

Various authors have linked the death of the prey to several factors: paralysis of the central nervous system, paralysis of the respiratory center, asphyxiation due to blood clotting, heart failure, urine retention caused by crystallized hemoglobin in the kidney tubules, dehydration of the body following swelling around the bite area, or tissue damage. The mouths of snakes contain reservoirs of infectious bacteria, which thrive especially well in damaged tissue. The growth of bacteria is encouraged by the venom, which inhibits the bactericidal properties of the blood.

Three grades in the severity of snakebite (I, minimal; II, moderate; and III, severe) were described by Wood, Hoback, and Green (1955). Parrish (1959:396) added a zero classification to describe the bite of a poisonous snake in which no envenomation occurred. Grade IV (very severe) was added by McCollough and Gennaro (1963:961) to account for many bites of the eastern and western diamondback rattlesnakes.

Three levels of snakebite severity were outlined by Wood, Hoback, and Green (1955): I for minimal, II for moderate, and III for severe. Parrish (1959:396) introduced a zero classification for bites from poisonous snakes that didn’t cause any envenomation. McCollough and Gennaro (1963:961) added Grade IV for very severe bites, particularly from eastern and western diamondback rattlesnakes.

The first symptom of poisonous snakebite is an immediate burning sensation at the site of the bite. Within a few minutes the loss of blood into the tissues causes discoloration. Swelling proceeds rapidly and can become so great as to rupture the skin. Pain is soon felt in the lymph ducts and glands. Weakness, [477] nausea, and vomiting may ensue at a relatively early stage. Loss of blood into tissues may spread to the internal organs. In conjunction with a rapid pulse, the blood pressure and body temperature can drop. Some difficulty in breathing can occur, especially if large amounts of neurotoxin are present in the venom. In severe cases the tension due to edema obstructs venous and even arterial flow, in which case bacteria may multiply rapidly in the necrotic tissue and gangrene can occur. Blindness due to retinal hemorrhages may occur. Symptoms of shock may be present after any bite.

The first sign of a poisonous snakebite is an immediate burning feeling at the site of the bite. Within a few minutes, blood collects in the tissues, leading to discoloration. Swelling happens quickly and can become so severe that it ruptures the skin. Pain soon develops in the lymph vessels and glands. Weakness, [477] nausea, and vomiting can occur fairly early on. Blood loss into the tissues may extend to the internal organs. Along with a rapid pulse, blood pressure and body temperature can drop. Breathing difficulties may arise, especially if there are large amounts of neurotoxin in the venom. In serious cases, the pressure from swelling can obstruct venous and even arterial flow, which can lead to rapid bacterial growth in the dead tissue and result in gangrene. Blindness from retinal bleeding may also happen. Shock symptoms may appear after any snakebite.

Treatment

Perhaps one of the most important factors in the outcome of snakebite is the treatment. Because of the variable reactions to snakebite, treatment should vary accordingly. Many methods have been proposed for treating snakebite, and there is disagreement as to which is the best. The list of remedies that have been used in cases of snakebite includes many that add additional injury or that possibly increase the action of the venom. The use of poultices made by splitting open living chickens and the use of alcohol, potassium permanganate, strychnine, caffeine, or injection of ammonia have no known therapeutic value, and may cause serious complications. The most important steps in the treatment of snakebite are to prevent the spread of lethal doses of venom, to remove as much venom as possible, and to neutralize the venom as quickly as possible.

Perhaps one of the most important factors in the outcome of a snakebite is the treatment. Because people can react differently to snakebites, treatment should vary accordingly. Many methods have been suggested for treating snakebites, and there's disagreement about which is the best. The list of remedies that have been used in snakebite cases includes many that can cause additional harm or that might actually worsen the effects of the venom. Using poultices made from living chickens, along with alcohol, potassium permanganate, strychnine, caffeine, or injecting ammonia, has no known therapeutic value and may lead to serious complications. The key steps in treating a snakebite are to prevent the spread of lethal doses of venom, remove as much venom as possible, and neutralize the venom as quickly as possible.

It is generally agreed that the first step in snakebite treatment should be to place a ligature above the bite to restrict the flow of venom, and also to immobilize the patient as much as possible. The ligature should be loosened at least every fifteen minutes. The next steps are sterilization of the skin and the making of an incision through the fang punctures. As pointed out by Stahnke (1954:8), the incision should be made in line with the snake's body at the time of the bite, so as to account for the rearward curvature of the fangs and possibly to reach the deposition of venom. Many instruction booklets and first-aid guides have specified the length and depth of incision to be made, but the actual size and depth of the cut should depend upon the location of the bite. An "X" cut or connection of the fang punctures is likely to facilitate the spread of the venom. No cut should be made that would sever a large blood vessel or ligament.

It’s generally accepted that the first step in treating a snakebite should be to tie a band above the bite to limit the flow of venom, and also to keep the patient as still as possible. The band should be loosened at least every fifteen minutes. Next, the area should be cleaned, and an incision should be made through the fang punctures. As Stahnke pointed out (1954:8), the incision should follow the line of the snake’s body at the time of the bite to accommodate the backward curve of the fangs and possibly access the venom. Many instructional booklets and first-aid guides have detailed the length and depth of the incision to be made, but the actual size and depth of the cut should depend on the bite's location. An "X" cut or connecting the fang punctures is likely to help spread the venom. No cut should be made that could sever a major blood vessel or ligament.

Extensive damage is often caused by well-meaning individuals whose attempts at first aid result in brutally deep incisions and tourniquets applied too tightly and for too long a period of time; the resultant damage in many instances exceeds that of the bite itself (Stimson and Engelhardt, 1960:165). Stimson and Engelhardt also think that time should be sacrificed to surgical cleanliness, and incisions should not be made if a hospital can be reached within an hour.

Extensive damage is often caused by well-meaning individuals whose attempts at first aid result in deep cuts and tourniquets applied too tightly and for too long; the damage in many cases is worse than the bite itself (Stimson and Engelhardt, 1960:165). Stimson and Engelhardt also believe that it’s better to prioritize surgical cleanliness, and incisions shouldn’t be made if a hospital can be reached within an hour.

The ligature-cryotherapy (L-C) method proposed by Stahnke (1953) has been severely criticized by other workers. He stated that the ligature should be tight enough to restrict completely the flow of venom until the temperature of the area can be lowered sufficiently to prevent any action of the venom. After 10 minutes the ligature may be removed and the bitten area kept immersed in a vessel of crushed ice and water. If the envenomized member is to be treated for more than four hours (which is the case with almost all [478] pit-viper bites), it should be protected by placing it in a plastic bag. The venom action should be tested after 12 or more hours. This consists of a brief warming period to determine whether or not the action of the venom can be felt. The patient should be kept warm at all times; and the warming at the termination of treatment should be done gradually, preferably by allowing the water to warm slowly to room temperature.

The ligature-cryotherapy (L-C) method introduced by Stahnke (1953) has faced significant criticism from other researchers. He indicated that the ligature should be tight enough to completely stop the flow of venom until the temperature of the area is lowered enough to prevent any effect of the venom. After 10 minutes, the ligature can be removed, and the bitten area should be kept submerged in a container of crushed ice and water. If the envenomated limb is going to be treated for more than four hours (which is the case with nearly all [478] pit viper bites), it should be protected by placing it in a plastic bag. The effects of the venom should be evaluated after 12 or more hours. This involves a brief warming period to check whether the venom's effects can still be felt. The patient should be kept warm at all times, and the warming process at the end of treatment should be done gradually, ideally by letting the water warm slowly to room temperature.

Advocates of the L-C method warn against making incisions unless they are absolutely necessary, the theory being that each cut permits additional bacterial infection and does little good in removing venom. However, McCollough and Gennaro (1963:963) demonstrated that, in bites where the fangs had only slightly penetrated the skin, more than 50 per cent of the venom was removed in some instances if suction was started within three minutes after the injection. With deeper injection the amount of venom recovered sometimes reached 20 per cent of the dose. Stahnke suggested that an incision be made at the site of the bite only after the site has been refrigerated for at least 30 minutes.

Advocates of the L-C method caution against making cuts unless absolutely necessary, as the idea is that each incision increases the risk of bacterial infection and doesn’t significantly help in removing venom. However, McCollough and Gennaro (1963:963) showed that, in bites where the fangs barely broke the skin, over 50 percent of the venom was removed in some cases if suction began within three minutes after the bite. With deeper bites, the amount of venom extracted sometimes reached 20 percent of the dose. Stahnke recommended that a cut should be made at the bite site only after it has been cooled for at least 30 minutes.

Stimson and Engelhardt (loc. cit.) stated that two constricting bands should be used between the bite and the body and that cracked ice in a cloth should be applied to the bite before reaching a hospital. In addition, they suggested the following procedure. Rings of incisions should follow the swelling, and suction should continue for several hours. After the edema has receded, the limb should be wrapped in a towel containing crushed ice. Antivenin should be given only in severe cases. Calcium gluconate and gas gangrene antitoxin as well as antibiotics are helpful.

Stimson and Engelhardt (loc. cit.) said that two constricting bands should be placed between the bite and the body, and that a cloth containing cracked ice should be applied to the bite before getting to a hospital. They also recommended the following procedure: make rings of incisions around the swelling, and apply suction for several hours. Once the swelling has gone down, the limb should be wrapped in a towel with crushed ice. Antivenin should only be administered in severe cases. Calcium gluconate, gas gangrene antitoxin, and antibiotics are beneficial.

The most recent and up-to-date summary of snakebite treatment is that by McCollough and Gennaro (1963). Following is a brief summary of their suggestions:

The latest summary of snakebite treatment comes from McCollough and Gennaro (1963). Here’s a brief overview of their recommendations:

1. Immobilization—Systemic immobilization is effected by body rest and locally by splinting the bitten area.

1. Immobilization—Systemic immobilization is achieved by resting the body and locally by splinting the affected area.

2. Tourniquet—A lightly occlusive tourniquet during a 30- to 60-minute period of incision and suction would seem to possess some advantages. In severe cases where medical attention is hours away, a completely occlusive tourniquet may be necessary to prevent death. Sacrifice of the extremity may be necessary for the preservation of life.

2. Tourniquet—Using a loosely applied tourniquet for 30 to 60 minutes during incision and suction seems to have some benefits. In serious situations where medical help is hours away, a completely tight tourniquet might be required to prevent death. In some cases, losing the limb may be necessary to save a life.

3. Incision and suction—Suction should begin three to five minutes after injection of venom if symptoms of poisoning are present. Incisions one-fourth inch to an inch long across each fang mark should be made in order to open the wound for more efficient suction. Multiple incisions are not useful for the removal of venom but may be employed under hospital conditions to reduce subcutaneous tensions and ischemia.

3. Incision and suction—Suction should start three to five minutes after injecting the venom if there are signs of poisoning. Make incisions that are one-fourth inch to an inch long across each fang mark to open the wound for more effective suction. Multiple incisions aren't helpful for getting rid of venom but can be used in a hospital setting to relieve subcutaneous pressure and lack of blood flow.

4. Cryotherapy—An ice cap over the site of the bite for relief of pain would seem to be permissible, especially prior to the administration of antivenin. It must be remembered that cooling during the administration of the antivenin radically reduces the access of the antiserum to the bite area.

4. Cryotherapy—Using an ice pack on the area where the bite occurred to help relieve pain seems acceptable, especially before giving antivenin. However, it's important to remember that cooling the area while administering the antivenin significantly limits the antiserum's ability to reach the bite site.

5. Antivenin—Antiserum is the keystone to the therapy of snakebite. Careful evaluation of the severity of the bite and the patient's sensitivity should be made before the use of antivenin. In Grade II (moderate) bites, the intramuscular injection on the side of the bite may suffice. In Grades III (severe) and IV (very severe), shock and systemic effects require intravenous injection. In bites producing symptoms of this severity, antivenin must be given in [479] amounts large enough to produce clinical improvement. Ten to 20 units may be necessary to prevent the relapse that sometimes occurs after small doses of antivenin. Permanent remission of swelling and interruption of necrosis are the therapeutic end point in the clinical use of the antiserum.

5. Antivenin—Antiserum is essential for treating snakebites. It's important to carefully assess how severe the bite is and the patient’s sensitivity before using antivenin. For Grade II (moderate) bites, an intramuscular injection at the site of the bite might be enough. For Grade III (severe) and Grade IV (very severe) bites, which can cause shock and systemic effects, intravenous injection is needed. In cases where symptoms are severe, antivenin must be administered in [479] large amounts to ensure clinical improvement. It may take 10 to 20 units to prevent a relapse that can happen after small doses of antivenin. The goal of using the antiserum is to achieve permanent reduction of swelling and stop any necrosis.

In all cases of snakebite where there is any doubt as to the snake's identity, it should be killed if possible and taken to the hospital for positive identification. In many instances of actual bites by poisonous snakes the only treatment needed was an injection of tetanus antitoxin or toxoid and sedation, because physical examination revealed no indication of poisoning (Stimson and Engelhardt, loc. cit.).

In all cases of snakebite where there is any doubt about which snake it was, it should be killed if possible and brought to the hospital for identification. In many cases of actual bites by venomous snakes, the only treatment needed was an injection of tetanus antitoxin or toxoid and sedation, because physical examination showed no signs of poisoning (Stimson and Engelhardt, loc. cit.).

Case History of a Bite

On July 29, 1963, at 8:20 a.m., I was treating a nine-month-old cottonmouth for mites. As I dropped the snake into a sink, it twisted its head and bit the tip of my right middle finger with one fang. The fang entered just under the fingernail and was directed downward, the venom being injected about five millimeters below the site of fang penetration. After placing the snake back in its cage, I squeezed the finger once to promote bleeding, wrapped a string around the base of the finger, and drove to Watkins Memorial Hospital on the University of Kansas campus. I began to feel a burning sensation in the tip of the finger almost immediately. Upon my arrival at the hospital, an additional ligature was placed around my wrist. At 8:30 a.m. a small incision was made in the end of the finger, which by this time was beginning to darken at the point of venom deposition. I sucked on the finger until 8:35 a.m., when a pan of ice water that I had requested was brought to me. No pain was felt except that caused by the ice. Fresh ice was added as needed to keep the temperature low. By 9:30 a.m. the finger had swollen and stiffened. At 10:00 a.m. the swelling had progressed to the index finger and back of the hand. I experienced difficulty in opening and closing the hand. Blood oozed slowly from the incision. A dull ache persisted and about every two to four minutes a sharp throb could be felt until nearly 11:00 a.m., when the pain diminished. The rate and intensity of throbbing increased whenever the hand was removed from the ice bath for more than a few seconds. Although only the hand was immersed, the entire forearm was cold. Pain was felt along the lymphatics on top of the arm when it was touched, and by 1:00 p.m. a slight pain could be felt in the armpit. Since swelling and pain were almost nonexistent by 2:00 p.m., I was permitted to leave. After walking to a nearby building, I again felt a burning sensation as the hand warmed. I made another ice bath and again immersed the hand in it until 4:10 p.m., at which time it was removed from the water. The pain and swelling began anew, and the hand was placed back in an ice bath from 5:30 p.m. until about 7:30 p.m. At this time cryotherapy was discontinued. From 10:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight my legs twitched periodically, and pain could be felt in both armpits. A slight difficulty in breathing also was experienced for a short time. The acute pain and burning sensation remained in the finger until the following morning, but swelling progressed only as far as the wrist. The only discomfort that day was in the finger. The tip was darkened, the entire first digit red and feverish, and the lymphatics still painful when touched. By the third day the swelling had regressed. The incision itself was the main cause of discomfort, and the soreness at the site of the bite persisted for at least four days.

On July 29, 1963, at 8:20 a.m., I was treating a nine-month-old cottonmouth for mites. As I dropped the snake into a sink, it twisted its head and bit the tip of my right middle finger with one fang. The fang went in just below the fingernail and pointed downward, injecting venom about five millimeters below where it bit. After putting the snake back in its cage, I squeezed my finger to encourage bleeding, wrapped a string around the base of the finger, and drove to Watkins Memorial Hospital on the University of Kansas campus. I started feeling a burning sensation at the tip of my finger almost immediately. When I got to the hospital, they added another tight band around my wrist. At 8:30 a.m., a small incision was made at the end of the finger, which by this point was starting to discolor at the site of the venom. I sucked on my finger until 8:35 a.m., when a pan of ice water that I had requested was finally brought to me. The only pain I felt was from the ice. Fresh ice was added as needed to keep the temperature low. By 9:30 a.m., my finger had swollen and stiffened. At 10:00 a.m., the swelling spread to my index finger and the back of my hand. I had trouble opening and closing my hand. Blood oozed slowly from the incision. A dull ache persisted, and about every two to four minutes, a sharp throb felt like it was coming until nearly 11:00 a.m., when the pain started to fade. The rate and intensity of the throbbing increased whenever I removed my hand from the ice bath for more than a few seconds. Even though only my hand was in the ice, my whole forearm felt cold. I felt pain along the lymphatics on top of my arm when touched, and by 1:00 p.m., I could feel a slight pain in my armpit. Since the swelling and pain were almost gone by 2:00 p.m., I was allowed to leave. After walking to a nearby building, I felt that burning sensation again as my hand warmed up. I made another ice bath and put my hand back in it until 4:10 p.m., when I took it out of the water. The pain and swelling started over again, and my hand went back in an ice bath from 5:30 p.m. until about 7:30 p.m. At that point, they stopped the cryotherapy. From 10:00 p.m. to midnight, my legs twitched periodically, and I felt pain in both armpits. I also experienced slight difficulty breathing for a short time. The sharp pain and burning sensation remained in my finger until the next morning, but the swelling only went up to my wrist. The only discomfort that day was in my finger. The tip was darkened, the whole first digit was red and feverish, and the lymphatics were still painful to touch. By the third day, the swelling had gone down. The incision itself was the main source of discomfort, and the soreness at the bite site lasted at least four days.

Although the L-C method of snakebite treatment has been vigorously attacked by many, there is still need of much more data before it can be unequivocally condemned or praised. It was preferred in the treatment of this bite because: I knew that envenomation was minimal and that there would be no need for antivenin; only one fang of a snake less than one foot long had entered the tip of the finger; the snake had bitten three frogs in the previous [480] two days and had possibly used up a considerable amount of its venom; the venom was deposited at such a shallow depth that at least a portion of it could be removed by suction; and the wound bled freely even before suction was applied. The ice water was uncomfortably cold but was not cold enough to cause frostbite, a major objection to the L-C method. Ideally, fresh ice should be added little by little to replace that which is melting, and the immersed area should be protected from the water by a plastic bag. Pain and swelling can be minimized by cryotherapy, but I would recommend its use only in cases of mild poisoning such as the one described herein.

Although the L-C method of treating snakebites has faced strong criticism from many, we still need a lot more data before it can be clearly condemned or praised. It was chosen for this bite because: I knew the envenomation was minimal and there would be no need for antivenin; only one fang of a snake less than one foot long had punctured the tip of the finger; the snake had bitten three frogs in the previous [480] two days and had probably used up a significant amount of its venom; the venom was injected at such a shallow depth that at least some of it could be removed by suction; and the wound was bleeding freely even before suction was applied. The ice water was uncomfortably cold but not cold enough to cause frostbite, which is a major drawback of the L-C method. Ideally, fresh ice should be added gradually to replace what is melting, and the area being treated should be protected from the water using a plastic bag. Pain and swelling can be reduced with cryotherapy, but I would only recommend it for mild cases of poisoning like the one described here.

Snakebite in the United States

Many estimates have been made of the number of bites of poisonous snakes that occur annually in the United States. The occurrence of poisonous snakebite has been nearly as badly underestimated as fatal results of their envenomations have been overrated. For important data on number of persons bitten by poisonous snakes in the United States, see the following: Allen and Swindell (1948:15); Githens (1935:172); Klauber (1956:811); Parrish (1963); Sowder and Gehres (1963:973); Stimson and Engelhardt (1960:153); Swaroop and Grab (1956:441); Swartzwelder (1950:579); Willson (1908:530); and Wood (1954b:937).

Many estimates have been made regarding the number of bites from poisonous snakes that happen every year in the United States. The frequency of poisonous snakebites has been significantly underestimated, just as the fatal consequences of their venom have been exaggerated. For key information on the number of people bitten by poisonous snakes in the United States, refer to the following: Allen and Swindell (1948:15); Githens (1935:172); Klauber (1956:811); Parrish (1963); Sowder and Gehres (1963:973); Stimson and Engelhardt (1960:153); Swaroop and Grab (1956:441); Swartzwelder (1950:579); Willson (1908:530); and Wood (1954b:937).

Judging from estimates made in several states, the number of poisonous snakebites in the United States would be about 5000 per year. In the region where the cottonmouth occurs there are approximately 2000 persons bitten annually by poisonous snakes. Of these approximately 39 per cent are copperhead bites, 30 per cent each are cottonmouth and rattlesnake bites, and I per cent are coral snake bites. These percentages vary considerably from place to place, because of the distribution and abundance of the eight species of poisonous snakes whose ranges overlap that of the cottonmouth.

Based on estimates from several states, there are about 5,000 poisonous snakebites in the United States each year. In the area where the cottonmouth is found, around 2,000 people are bitten by poisonous snakes annually. Of these, about 39% are from copperhead bites, 30% each from cottonmouth and rattlesnake bites, and 1% from coral snake bites. These percentages vary significantly by location due to the distribution and abundance of the eight species of poisonous snakes that overlap with the cottonmouth's range.

According to Parrish (1963), about 14 people die of snakebite each year in the United States. Of these deaths, about 6.6 per cent are attributable to cottonmouths, 77.0 per cent to rattlesnakes, and 1.6 per cent to coral snakes; 14.8 per cent are unidentified. Almost half of the fatalities are in persons less than 20 years of age, the high mortality rate being partially due to the greater ratio of venom to body weight.

According to Parrish (1963), around 14 people die from snakebites each year in the United States. Of these deaths, about 6.6 percent are caused by cottonmouths, 77.0 percent by rattlesnakes, and 1.6 percent by coral snakes; 14.8 percent are from unidentified snakes. Almost half of the fatalities are in people under 20 years old, with the high death rate partially due to the higher ratio of venom to body weight.


SUMMARY

In my study, 306 living and preserved cottonmouths were examined. This species occurs throughout the coastal plains of the southeastern United States, usually at altitudes of less than 500 feet but occasionally up to altitudes of more than 2000 feet.

In my study, I examined 306 living and preserved cottonmouths. This species is found across the coastal plains of the southeastern United States, typically at elevations below 500 feet but sometimes reaching over 2000 feet.

Two subspecies are recognized: the eastern cottonmouth, A. p. piscivorus, occurring from extreme eastern Mississippi to southeastern Virginia and Florida; and the western cottonmouth, A. p. leucostoma, occurring from eastern Mississippi northward to southern Illinois and Missouri and westward to central Texas. Intergradation occurs in eastern Mississippi.

Two subspecies are recognized: the eastern cottonmouth, A. p. piscivorus, found from extreme eastern Mississippi to southeastern Virginia and Florida; and the western cottonmouth, A. p. leucostoma, found from eastern Mississippi north to southern Illinois and Missouri, and west to central Texas. There is intergradation in eastern Mississippi.

The northern edge of the range is probably limited by low temperatures in winter, and the western edge by lack of available habitat resulting from insufficient precipitation. Old records of occurrence indicate that the range has decreased in the last 100 years. The species inhabits mostly areas where water is found, but at times wanders a mile or more from the nearest water.

The northern boundary of the range is likely restricted by cold winter temperatures, while the western boundary is limited by a shortage of suitable habitat due to low rainfall. Historical records show that the range has shrunk over the past century. The species primarily lives in areas with water but occasionally travels a mile or more away from the closest water source.

The ground color is predominantly a brown, but varies from a brownish-green to almost black with a pattern of 10 to 17 irregular bands of a darker shade of brown. The pattern is better defined in the eastern subspecies than in the western.

The main color is mostly brown, but it changes from a brownish-green to nearly black, featuring 10 to 17 uneven bands of a darker shade of brown. The pattern is more distinct in the eastern subspecies than in the western.

The scutellation resembles that of other species of Agkistrodon. In the specimens examined supralabials ranged from 7 to 9, and infralabials from 8 to 12. The number of dorsal scale rows on the neck, at mid-body, and immediately anterior to the anus is relatively constant at 27-25-21, respectively. Ventral scales of 34 males averaged 134.4 (128 to 139), and those of 48 females 133.5 (128 to 137). The number of caudal scales showed some degree of sexual dimorphism; the average was 45.4 (41 to 50) in 34 males and 42.6 (39 to 49) in 44 females. In general, caudal scales on the basal half of the tail are undivided, whereas those on the distal half are divided. No marked geographical variation was found in any scale character.

The scale pattern is similar to that of other species of Agkistrodon. In the specimens that were examined, the supralabials ranged from 7 to 9, and the infralabials ranged from 8 to 12. The number of dorsal scale rows on the neck, at mid-body, and just before the anus remained fairly constant at 27-25-21, respectively. The ventral scales of 34 males averaged 134.4 (ranging from 128 to 139), while those of 48 females averaged 133.5 (ranging from 128 to 137). The number of caudal scales showed some level of sexual dimorphism; the average was 45.4 (ranging from 41 to 50) in 34 males and 42.6 (ranging from 39 to 49) in 44 females. Generally, the caudal scales on the first half of the tail are undivided, while those on the second half are divided. No significant geographical variation was observed in any scale characteristic.

The poison fangs vary in length from 1.3 per cent of snout-vent length in juveniles to 1.0 per cent in large adults. Fangs of captive cottonmouths were shed and replaced at intervals of about 21 days, but the interval was variable. Relationships in distance between the base of fangs and between fang punctures in an actual bite indicate that examination of the wound does not provide a good basis for judging accurately the size of the snake that inflicted the bite.

The length of poison fangs ranges from 1.3% of snout-vent length in juveniles to 1.0% in large adults. Captive cottonmouths shed and replaced their fangs approximately every 21 days, although this can vary. The distance between the bases of the fangs and the fang punctures in an actual bite shows that examining the wound isn’t a reliable way to accurately determine the size of the snake that made the bite.

In general, females less than 450 millimeters in snout-vent length were juveniles; those more than 450 millimeters were classified as post partum or reproductive on the basis of sizes of ovarian follicles. Since about half the adult females were fecund, it was concluded that a biennial reproductive cycle occurs in this species. An annual cycle may occur in areas where temperature permits year-round activity. It was estimated that females become sexually mature at an age of approximately two and one-half years. Mating is probably most concentrated in early spring at about the time when females ovulate, but copulation is not a stimulus for ovulation. Sperm retention and delayed fertilization allow young to be produced without [482] copulation occurring in each breeding season. The testes increase in size gradually rather than rapidly at maturity or in each breeding season, but seasonal cycles in sperm production occur.

In general, females shorter than 450 millimeters in snout-vent length were considered juveniles; those longer than 450 millimeters were classified as post-partum or reproductive based on the size of their ovarian follicles. Since about half of the adult females were fertile, it was concluded that this species has a biennial reproductive cycle. An annual cycle may happen in areas where the temperature allows for year-round activity. It was estimated that females reach sexual maturity at about two and a half years old. Mating likely peaks in early spring, around the time when females ovulate, but copulation does not trigger ovulation. Sperm retention and delayed fertilization enable the production of young without copulation occurring in every breeding season. The testes gradually increase in size rather than rapidly at maturity or during each breeding season, but seasonal cycles in sperm production do take place.

The gestation period is three and one-half to four months. Determination of sex in the embryos is possible by late June, because the hemipenes of males are evaginated until the time of birth. Parturition generally occurs in August or September, but captivity may delay birth for a month or more. From one to 16 young per litter are born, depending on size of the mother and other factors; but the average is between six and seven. Mortality rate at birth is high in captive individuals but has not been determined in natural populations. The sex ratio in embryos and adults examined revealed about 53 per cent females. Because sufficient information on population composition is not available, an estimate of the percentage of adults in a natural population was based upon the number found in my study. The reproductive potential was estimated from these figures.

The gestation period lasts about three and a half to four months. The sex of the embryos can be identified by late June, as the hemipenes of males extend until birth. Most births happen in August or September, but being in captivity can delay the delivery by a month or more. Litter sizes vary from one to 16 young, depending on the mother's size and other factors; however, the average is around six to seven. The mortality rate at birth is high for individuals in captivity, but it hasn't been measured in wild populations. The sex ratio in the studied embryos and adults showed roughly 53 percent females. Since there's not enough information on population composition, the estimate of the percentage of adults in a natural population was based on the numbers found in my study. The reproductive potential was calculated from these figures.

Normal young at birth are 230 to 240 millimeters in snout-vent length, but their size is influenced by the condition of the mother. Comparison of newborn young with those captured in spring indicates that little growth occurs during winter. Early growth is largely dependent upon feeding before winter quiescence.

Normal young at birth are 230 to 240 millimeters in snout-vent length, but their size is influenced by the mother's condition. Comparing newborn young with those captured in spring shows that there's little growth during winter. Early growth mainly depends on feeding before winter dormancy.

The umbilical cord is broken at birth and the navel closes within a few days, but the scar remains throughout life. Sexual dimorphism in the position of the scar is characteristic of some snakes but is minimal in cottonmouths.

The umbilical cord is cut at birth, and the belly button heals within a few days, but the scar lasts a lifetime. There’s a noticeable difference in the position of the scar between male and female snakes, but this difference is minimal in cottonmouths.

In those snakes more than 700 millimeters in length, males outnumber females three to one. The maximum age of cottonmouths in nature is unknown, but one has been kept in captivity for more than 18 years.

In snakes that are over 700 millimeters long, males outnumber females three to one. The maximum age of cottonmouths in the wild is unknown, but one has lived in captivity for more than 18 years.

Allometric growth is striking in cottonmouths. The head and tail are proportionately longer in young individuals than in adults; and in males the tail is, on the average, slightly longer than in females of the same size.

Allometric growth is noticeable in cottonmouths. The head and tail are relatively longer in younger individuals compared to adults; and in males, the tail is generally a bit longer than in females of the same size.

Shedding of the skin provides for growth and wear in snakes. The young shed within a few days after birth and generally shed more frequently than adults. Frequency of shedding depends mostly on amount of food consumed, and there is some evidence that injuries on the head and neck increase the frequency of shedding. Before shedding, the eyes become cloudy for about five [483] and one-half days, then clear up again for about four days before the skin is shed.

Shedding skin allows snakes to grow and renew themselves. Young snakes shed just a few days after being born and usually shed more often than adults. How often they shed mainly depends on how much they eat, and there’s some evidence that injuries on their head and neck can increase shedding frequency. Before they shed, their eyes turn cloudy for about five [483] and a half days, then clear up again for about four days before the skin comes off.

The food of cottonmouths consists mainly of small vertebrates and occasionally invertebrates that are found near water. Fish, amphibians, and reptiles make up nearly 70 per cent of the diet. Carrion is also eaten and cannibalism occurs occasionally. Food is obtained by lying in ambush or by active searching. The young are known to lure their prey within striking range by waving their yellow tails in a manner suggestive of writhing grubs. The method of obtaining prey differs according to the kind of prey. Generally, cottonmouths retain their hold on fish or frogs but release mice and larger prey after delivering a bite.

The diet of cottonmouths mainly includes small vertebrates and sometimes invertebrates that are found near water. Fish, amphibians, and reptiles make up almost 70 percent of their food. They also eat carrion, and cannibalism happens occasionally. They catch food by lying in wait or by actively searching. Young cottonmouths are known to attract their prey by waving their yellow tails in a way that looks like wriggling grubs. The way they catch their prey varies depending on what they are targeting. Generally, cottonmouths hold on to fish or frogs but let go of mice and larger prey after biting them.

The major causes of mortality of cottonmouths are obscure. Predators are known to include alligators, indigo snakes, king-snakes, largemouth bass, and blue herons; there are probably numerous others. Heavy parasitic infestations were found among the snakes examined. Snake mites, Ophionyssus natricus, became increasingly abundant on almost all captive snakes in April and May of 1963. Lung flukes (Ochetosoma sp.) were in 16 of 20 captive snakes, and many preserved specimens contained nematodes (Kalicephalus sp.) in the stomach and/or tapeworms (Ophiotaenia sp.) in the intestine. Although parasitic infestation causes discomfort and may lower resistance to other detrimental factors, it is difficult to attribute death to the effect of any particular kind of parasite. Miscellaneous causes of death of some captive snakes also were discussed.

The main reasons cottonmouths die are not well understood. Predators include alligators, indigo snakes, king snakes, largemouth bass, and blue herons; there are likely many more. Severe parasitic infestations were found in the snakes examined. Snake mites, Ophionyssus natricus, became increasingly common on nearly all captive snakes in April and May of 1963. Lung flukes (Ochetosoma sp.) were present in 16 out of 20 captive snakes, and many preserved specimens had nematodes (Kalicephalus sp.) in their stomachs and/or tapeworms (Ophiotaenia sp.) in their intestines. Even though parasitic infestations cause discomfort and may weaken resistance to other harmful factors, it's hard to link death to any specific type of parasite. Various other causes of death in some captive snakes were also mentioned.

The maximal body temperatures tolerated by four cottonmouths were between 38° and 40° C., but a temperature of 38° was lethal to a fifth individual. Cottonmouths have been found on occasion when other snakes were inactive because of low temperatures, but minimal temperatures tolerated by this species are not known. The annual cycle of activity is dependent upon temperature and thus varies from north to south. Cottonmouths generally migrate inland in autumn, usually to dry forested hillsides, where they den along with other species of snakes. After a few warm days in spring they migrate back to the water's edge. The diel activity cycle likewise depends upon temperatures but is influenced by other factors as well. In spring and autumn, the snakes are active mostly on warm, sunny days, whereas in summer they are active mostly at night. In order to maintain adequate internal temperatures, much [484] time is spent basking mostly in a characteristic flat, resting coil either beside a body of water or above water on limbs of dead trees. In this position the snake is ready either for a short strike or a hasty getaway.

The highest body temperatures that four cottonmouths can handle ranged from 38° to 40° C., but a temperature of 38° was fatal for a fifth one. Cottonmouths have occasionally been spotted when other snakes were inactive due to cooler temperatures, but the lowest temperatures this species can tolerate are unknown. Their yearly activity cycle depends on temperature, which varies from north to south. Cottonmouths typically move inland in the fall, usually to dry, forested hillsides, where they den alongside other species of snakes. After a few warm days in spring, they migrate back to the water’s edge. The daily activity cycle also depends on temperature, but is influenced by other factors as well. In spring and autumn, the snakes are mostly active on warm, sunny days, while in summer they are primarily active at night. To maintain proper internal temperatures, much [484] time is spent basking, typically in a characteristic flat, resting coil either next to water or above it on the limbs of dead trees. In this position, the snake is ready for a quick strike or a fast escape.

Juveniles appear particularly aggressive and strike repeatedly when approached, a behavioral pattern definitely favoring survival. Adults vary in disposition, usually appearing sluggish and lazy, but they are capable of striking rapidly when disturbed. The typical threat display consists of lying in a coiled position with the mouth opened widely, exposing the white interior, and with the tail vibrating rapidly. The striking posture resembles the resting coil except that the anterior part of the body is raised off the ground and the mouth is sometimes opened. Musk is often ejected in a fine spray from glands in the tail as a further defensive action.

Juveniles seem especially aggressive and will strike multiple times when approached, a behavior that definitely helps them survive. Adults differ in their temperament, often appearing sluggish and lazy, but they can strike quickly when disturbed. The typical threat display involves lying in a coiled position with their mouth wide open, showing the white interior, and their tail vibrating rapidly. The striking posture looks like the resting coil except that the front part of the body is lifted off the ground, and the mouth may be opened. Musk is often released in a fine spray from glands in the tail as an additional form of defense.

"Head bobbing," more properly described as spastic contractions of the body, was observed in captives when food was introduced into a cage containing several individuals or when one of the snakes was returned to the cage after being handled. Reports in the literature also have connected these jerking movements with courtship. The response appears to be elicited whenever a nervous state is recognized in another individual and may serve to protect the jerking individual from aggressive advances of the former.

"Head bobbing," more accurately described as involuntary body spasms, was seen in captives when food was brought into a cage with several individuals or when one of the snakes was put back into the cage after being handled. Studies have also linked these jerking movements to courtship. This response seems to be triggered whenever nervous behavior is detected in another individual and may help shield the twitching individual from possible aggressive actions by the other.

The relatively heavy appearance of the body, sluggish habits, and cryptic coloration are correlated with the development of venom and fangs. The poison apparatus has developed primarily as a means of causing rapid death in prey and secondarily, perhaps, to begin the digestion of small animals that are the usual prey, but it is also important as a defensive device. The venom contains at least eight constituents that aid in its action on prey. Toxicity of the venom is difficult to determine because of numerous variables, but cottonmouth venom is generally believed to be less potent than that of most rattlesnakes and more potent than that of the copperhead. Snakes in general are more resistant to snake venoms than other vertebrates of similar size, but there is no immunity even to their own venom.

The fairly heavy build of the body, slow lifestyle, and cryptic colors are linked to the evolution of venom and fangs. The venom system has mainly developed as a way to quickly kill prey and, to some extent, to start digesting smaller animals that are typically hunted, but it also plays an important role in defense. The venom includes at least eight components that help it affect prey. Determining the toxicity of venom is tricky due to many variables, but cottonmouth venom is generally thought to be less potent than that of most rattlesnakes and more potent than that of the copperhead. Snakes, in general, are more resistant to snake venoms than other vertebrates of similar size, but they aren’t immune, even to their own venom.

About ten per cent of the approximately 5000 bites of poisonous snakes per year in the United States are attributable to cottonmouths, and about seven per cent of the approximately 14 deaths per year are caused by cottonmouths.

About ten percent of the roughly 5,000 bites from poisonous snakes each year in the United States come from cottonmouths, and around seven percent of the approximately 14 deaths each year are caused by cottonmouths.


LITERATURE CITED

Allen, E. R.

Allen, E. R.

1937. Florida snake venom experiments. Florida Acad. Sci., 2:7 pp.

1937. Experiments on Florida snake venom. Florida Academy of Sciences, 2:7 pp.

Allen, E. R., and Swindell, D.

Allen, E. R., and Swindell, D.

1948. Cottonmouth moccasin of Florida. Herpetologica, 4:1-16 (first supplement).

1948. Cottonmouth moccasin from Florida. Herpetologica, 4:1-16 (first supplement).

Allen, M. J.

Allen, M. J.

1932. A survey of the amphibians and reptiles of Harrison County, Mississippi. Amer. Mus. Novit., 542:1-20.

1932. A study of the frogs, toads, and reptiles of Harrison County, Mississippi. Amer. Mus. Novit., 542:1-20.

Anderson, P.

Anderson, P.

1941. The cottonmouth in northern Missouri. Copeia, 1941(3):178.

1941. The cottonmouth in northern Missouri. Copeia, 1941(3):178.

1945. New herpetological records for Missouri. Bull. Chicago Acad. Sci., 7(5):271-275.

1945. New records of reptiles and amphibians for Missouri. Bull. Chicago Acad. Sci., 7(5):271-275.

Anon.

Anonymous

1953. Snake collecting hobby of Colonial Heights lad. Virginia Wildlife, 14-24.

1953. A kid from Colonial Heights has a hobby of collecting snakes. Virginia Wildlife, 14-24.

Auffenberg, W.

Auffenberg, W.

1963. The fossil snakes of Florida. Tulane Studies Zool., 10(3):131-216, 51 figs.

1963. The fossil snakes of Florida. Tulane Studies in Zoology, 10(3):131-216, 51 figures.

Bailey, R. M.

Bailey, R. M.

1948. Winter mortality in the snake Storeria dekayi. Copeia, 1948(3): 215.

1948. Winter death rates in the snake Storeria dekayi. Copeia, 1948(3): 215.

Barbour, R. W.

Barbour, R. W.

1956. A study of the cottonmouth, Agkistrodon piscivorus leucostoma Troost, in Kentucky. Trans. Kentucky Acad. Sci., 17(1):33-41, 1 fig.

1956. A study of the cottonmouth, Agkistrodon piscivorus leucostoma Troost, in Kentucky. Trans. Kentucky Acad. Sci., 17(1):33-41, 1 fig.

Blanchard, F. N.

Blanchard, F. N.

1922. The amphibians and reptiles of western Tennessee. Occ. Pap. Mus. Zool.; Univ. Michigan, 117:1-18.

1922. The amphibians and reptiles of western Tennessee. Occ. Pap. Mus. Zool.; Univ. Michigan, 117:1-18.

Bogert, C. M.

Bogert, C. M.

1943. Dentitional phenomena in cobras and other elapids with notes on adaptive modifications of fangs. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 81(3):285-360.

1943. Dental characteristics in cobras and other elapids with observations on adaptive changes in fangs. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 81(3):285-360.

Brattstrom, B. H.

Brattstrom, B. H.

1954. The fossil pitvipers (Reptilia: Crotalidae) of North America. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist., 12(3):31-46, 2 figs.

1954. The fossil pit vipers (Reptilia: Crotalidae) of North America. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist., 12(3):31-46, 2 figs.

Brown, A. E.

Brown, A. E.

1903. Texas reptiles and their faunal relations. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, pp. 543-558.

1903. Texas reptiles and their relationships with other animals. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, pp. 543-558.

Carpenter, C. C.

Carpenter, C. C.

1958. Reproduction, young, eggs, and food of Oklahoma snakes. Herpetologica, 14:113-115.

1958. The reproduction, young, eggs, and diet of snakes in Oklahoma. Herpetologica, 14:113-115.

Carr, A. F., Jr.

Carr, A. F., Jr.

1936. The gulf-island cottonmouths. Proc. Florida Acad. Sci., 1:86-90.

1936. The gulf-island cottonmouths. Proceedings of the Florida Academy of Sciences, 1:86-90.

Carr, A. F., Jr., and Carr, M. H.

Carr, A. F., Jr., and Carr, M.H.

1942. Notes on the courtship of the cottonmouth moccasin. Proc. New England Zool. Club, July 18, 20:1-6.

1942. Observations on the mating behavior of the cottonmouth moccasin. Proc. New England Zool. Club, July 18, 20:1-6.

Clark, R. F.

Clark, R. F.

1949. Snakes of the hill parishes of Louisiana. Jour. Tennessee Acad. Sci., 24(4):244-261.

1949. Snakes of the hill parishes in Louisiana. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science, 24(4):244-261.

Conant, R.

Conant, R.

1933. Three generations of cottonmouths, Agkistrodon piscivorus (Lacépède). Copeia, 1933(1):43.

1933. Three generations of cottonmouths, Agkistrodon piscivorus (Lacépède). Copeia, 1933(1):43.

1934. Two rattlesnakes killed by a cottonmouth. Science, 80(2078):382.

1934. Two rattlesnakes killed by a cottonmouth. Science, 80(2078):382.

1958. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, 366 pp.

1958. A guide to reptiles and amphibians. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, 366 pages.

Cook, F. A.

Cook, F. A.

1962. Snakes of Mississippi. Mississippi Game and Fish Comm., Surv. Bull., ii + 45 pp.

1962. Snakes of Mississippi. Mississippi Game and Fish Commission, Survey Bulletin, ii + 45 pages.

Corrington, J. D.

Corrington, J. D.

1929. Herpetology of the Columbia, South Carolina region. Copeia, 1929:58-83.

1929. The study of reptiles and amphibians in the Columbia, South Carolina region. Copeia, 1929:58-83.

Cowles, R. B.

Cowles, R. B.

1938. Unusual defense postures assumed by rattlesnakes. Copeia, 1938(1):13.

1938. Unusual defensive strategies used by rattlesnakes. Copeia, 1938(1):13.

Cowles, R. B., and Bogert, C. M.

Cowles, R.B., and Bogert, C.M.

1944. A preliminary study of the thermal requirements of desert reptiles. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 83(5):263-296.

1944. An initial study on the temperature requirements of desert reptiles. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 83(5):263-296.

Criley, B. R.

Criley, B. R.

1956. Development of a multivalent antivenin for the family Crotalidae. Pp. 373-380 in Venoms (ed. Buckley, E. E., and Porges, N., Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Publ. No. 44).

1956. Creation of a multivalent antivenom for the Crotalidae family. Pp. 373-380 in Venoms (eds. Buckley, E. E., and Porges, N., Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Publ. No. 44).

Darlington, P. J.

Darlington, P.J.

1957. Zoogeography: the geographical distribution of animals. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, xi + 675 pp.

1957. Zoogeography: the geographic distribution of animals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, xi + 675 pages.

Davis, D. D.

Davis, D. D.

1936. Courtship and mating behavior in snakes. Zool. Series Field Mus. Nat. Hist., 20:257-290, figs. 28-34.

1936. Courtship and mating behavior in snakes. Zool. Series Field Mus. Nat. Hist., 20:257-290, figs. 28-34.

Didisheim, P., and Lewis, J. H.

Didisheim, P., and Lewis, J. H.

1956. Fibrinolytic and coagulent activities of certain snake venoms and proteases. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 93(1):10-13.

1956. The effects of certain snake venoms and proteases on fibrinolytic and coagulation activities. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 93(1):10-13.

Ditmars, R. L.

Ditmars, R. L.

1915. The reptile book. Doubleday, Page and Co., Garden City, N. Y., xxxii + 472 pp.

1915. The Reptile Book. Doubleday, Page and Co., Garden City, NY, xxxii + 472 pages.

1945. The reptiles of North America. Doubleday, Doran and Co., Inc., Garden City, N. Y., xvi + 476 pp., 135 pls.

1945. The Reptiles of North America. Doubleday, Doran and Co., Inc., Garden City, NY, xvi + 476 pages, 135 illustrations.

Dowling, H. G.

Dowling, H. G.

1951a. A proposed standard system of counting ventrals in snakes. British Jour. Herp., 1(5):97-98, 1 fig.

1951a. A proposed standard method for counting ventral scales in snakes. British Journal of Herpetology, 1(5):97-98, 1 fig.

1951b. A proposed method of expressing scale reductions in snakes. Copeia, 1951(2):131-134.

1951b. A proposed method for illustrating scale reductions in snakes. Copeia, 1951(2):131-134.

Dundee, H. A., and Burger, W. L., Jr.

Dundee, H.A., and Burger, W. L., Jr.

1948. A denning aggregation of the western cottonmouth. Nat. Hist. Misc., Chicago Acad. Sci., 21:1-2.

1948. A denning group of the western cottonmouth. Nat. Hist. Misc., Chicago Acad. Sci., 21:1-2.

Edgren, R. A.

Edgren, R. A.

1951. The umbilical scar, a sexually dimorphic character in Heterodon platyrhinos. Nat. Hist. Misc., 83:1-2.

1951. The belly button scar, a trait that varies by sex in Heterodon platyrhinos. Nat. Hist. Misc., 83:1-2.

Fairley, N. H.

Fairley, NH

1929. The present position of snake bite and the snake bitten in Australia. Med. Jour. Australia, 1(10):296-313.

1929. The current situation regarding snake bites and the people impacted by them in Australia. Med. Jour. Australia, 1(10):296-313.

Fitch, H. S.

Fitch, H. S.

1956. Temperature responses in free-living amphibians and reptiles in northeastern Kansas. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 8(7):417-476, 10 figs., 6 tables.

1956. Temperature responses in wild amphibians and reptiles in northeastern Kansas. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 8(7):417-476, 10 figs., 6 tables.

1960. Autecology of the copperhead. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 13(4):85-288, pls. 13-20, 26 figs.

1960. Autecology of the copperhead. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 13(4):85-288, pls. 13-20, 26 figs.

Force, E. R.

Force, E. R.

1930. The amphibians and reptiles of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, and vicinity. Copeia, 1930(2):25-39.

1930. The amphibians and reptiles of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, and the surrounding area. Copeia, 1930(2):25-39.

Fox, W.

Fox, W.

1948. Effect of temperature on development of scutulation in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans atratus. Copeia, 1948(4):252-262.

1948. The impact of temperature on the development of scutulation in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans atratus. Copeia, 1948(4):252-262.

Githens, T. S.

Githens, T. S.

1935. Studies on the venoms of North American pit vipers. Jour. Immun., 29(2):165-173.

1935. Study on the venoms of North American pit vipers. Journal of Immunology, 29(2):165-173.

Glissmeyer, H. R.

Glissmeyer, H. R.

1951. Symposium. A snake den in Tooele County, Utah. Egg production of the great basin rattlesnake. Herpetologica, 7(1):24-27.

1951. Symposium. A snake den in Tooele County, Utah. The egg production of the Great Basin rattlesnake. Herpetologica, 7(1):24-27.

Gloyd, H. K.

Gloyd, H.K.

1933. On the effects of moccasin venom upon a rattlesnake. Science, 78(2010):13-14.

1933. The impact of moccasin venom on a rattlesnake. Science, 78(2010):13-14.

1934. Studies on the breeding habits and young of the copperhead, Agkistrodon mokasen Beauvois. Papers Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts and Letters, 19:587-604.

1934. Research on the breeding habits and offspring of the copperhead, Agkistrodon mokasen Beauvois. Papers Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts and Letters, 19:587-604.

Gloyd, H. K., and Conant, R.

Gloyd, H. K., and Conant, R.

1943. A synopsis of the American forms of Agkistrodon (copperheads and moccasins). Bull. Chicago Acad. Sci., 7(2):147-170, 16 figs.

1943. A summary of the American types of Agkistrodon (copperheads and moccasins). Bulletin of the Chicago Academy of Sciences, 7(2):147-170, 16 figures.

Goodman, J. D.

Goodman, J. D.

1958. Material ingested by the cottonmouth, Agkistrodon piscivorus, at Reelfoot Lake, Tennessee. Copeia, 1958(2):149.

1958. Material consumed by the cottonmouth, Agkistrodon piscivorus, at Reelfoot Lake, Tennessee. Copeia, 1958(2):149.

Guidry, E. V.

Guidry, E. V.

1953. Herpetological notes from southeastern Texas. Herpetologica, 9:49-56.

1953. Notes on reptiles and amphibians from southeastern Texas. Herpetologica, 9:49-56.

Hall, H. H., and Smith, H. M.

Hall, H.H., and Smith, H. M.

1947. Selected records of reptiles and amphibians from southeastern Kansas. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 49(4):447-454.

1947. Selected records of reptiles and amphibians from southeastern Kansas. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 49(4):447-454.

Hamilton, W. J., Jr., and Pollack, J. A.

Hamilton, W. J., Jr., and Pollack, J.A.

1955. The food of some crotalid snakes from Fort Benning, Georgia. Nat. Hist. Misc., 140:1-4.

1955. The diet of some rattlesnakes from Fort Benning, Georgia. Nat. Hist. Misc., 140:1-4.

Herald, E. S.

Herald, E. S.

1949. Effects of DDT oil solution upon amphibians and reptiles. Herpetologica, 5(6):117-120.

1949. The impact of DDT oil solution on amphibians and reptiles. Herpetologica, 5(6):117-120.

Hickman, C. P.

Hickman, C. P.

1922. A northern record for the water moccasin. Copeia, 1922(106):39.

1922. A northern record of the water moccasin. Copeia, 1922(106):39.

Hurter, J. H.

Hurter, J. H.

1897. A contribution to the herpetology of Missouri. Trans. Acad. Sci. St. Louis, 7:499-503.

1897. A study on reptiles and amphibians in Missouri. Transactions of the Academy of Sciences. St. Louis, 7:499-503.

Jacques, R.

Jacques, R.

1956. The hyaluronidase content of animal venoms. Pp. 291-293 in Venoms (ed. Buckley, E. E., and Porges, N., Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Publ. No. 44).

1956. The levels of hyaluronidase in animal venoms. Pp. 291-293 in Venoms (ed. Buckley, E. E., and Porges, N., Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Publ. No. 44).

Keegan, H. L., and Andrews, T. F.

Keegan, H.L., and Andrews, T.F.

1942. Effects of crotalid venom on North American snakes. Copeia, 1942:251-254.

1942. The impact of rattlesnake venom on North American snakes. Copeia, 1942:251-254.

Kellogg, R.

Kellogg, R.

1925. Poisonous snakes of the United States. U. S. D. A. Papers (371), 13 pp.

1925. Venomous snakes in the United States. U.S. D.A. Papers (371), 13 pages.

Klauber, L. M.

Klauber, L. M.

1941. Four papers on the application of statistical methods to herpetological problems. Bull. Zool. Soc. San Diego, 17:1-95.

1941. Four papers on using statistical methods for herpetology topics. Bull. Zool. Soc. San Diego, 17:1-95.

1956. Rattlesnakes. Univ. California Press, 2 vols., xxix + 1476 pp.

1956. Rattlesnakes. University of California Press, 2 volumes, xxix + 1476 pages.

Klimstra, W. D.

Klimstra, W. D.

1959. Food habits of the cottonmouth in southern Illinois. Chicago Acad. Sci., Nat. Hist. Misc., 168:1-8.

1959. Eating habits of the cottonmouth in southern Illinois. Chicago Academy of Sciences, Natural History Miscellaneous, 168:1-8.

Laughlin, H. E.

Laughlin, H. E.

1959. Stomach contents of some aquatic snakes from Lake McAlester, Pittsburgh County, Oklahoma. Texas Jour. Sci., 11(1):83-85.

1959. Stomach contents of several water snakes from Lake McAlester in Pittsburgh County, Oklahoma. Texas Journal of Science, 11(1):83-85.

Lederer, G.

Lederer, G.

1931. Aus meinem Tagebuch. Wachenschrift fur Aquar. und Terr'kde., 28:651-653.

1931. From my diary. Writing about Aquar. and Terr'kde., 28:651-653.

Lee, H. T.

Lee, H. T.

1964. Letters to the Editor, Texas Game and Fish Mag., 22(3):32.

1964. Letters to the Editor, Texas Game and Fish Magazine, 22(3):32.

Lowe, C. H., Jr.

Lowe, C. H., Jr.

1948. Territorial behavior in snakes and the so-called courtship dance. Herpetologica, 4(4):129-145.

1948. Territorial behavior in snakes and the so-called courtship dance. Herpetologica, 4(4):129-145.

Mansueti, R.

Mansueti, R.

1946. Mating of the pilot blacksnake. Herpetologica, 3:98-100, 1 fig.

1946. Mating of the pilot blacksnake. Herpetologica, 3:98-100, 1 fig.

Martin, J. R., and Wood, J. T.

Martin, J.R., and Wood, J.T.

1955. Notes on the poisonous snakes of the Dismal Swamp area. Herpetologica, 11(3):237-238.

1955. Notes on the poisonous snakes of the Dismal Swamp area. Herpetologica, 11(3):237-238.

McCollough, N. C., and Gennaro, J. F., Jr.

McCollough, NC, and Gennaro, J.F., Jr.

1963. Evaluation of venomous snake bite in the southern United States from parallel clinical and laboratory investigations. Jour. Florida Med. Assn., 49(12):959-967.

1963. Evaluation of venomous snake bites in the southern United States through clinical and laboratory research. Jour. Florida Med. Assn., 49(12):959-967.

McIlhenny, E. A.

McIlhenny, E. A.

1935. The alligator's life history. The Christopher Publ. House, Boston, Massachusetts, 117 pp.

1935. The Life History of the Alligator. The Christopher Publishing House, Boston, Massachusetts, 117 pages.

Minton, S. A., Jr.

Minton, S. A., Jr.

1953. Variation in venom samples from copperheads (Agkistrodon contortrix mokeson) and timber rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus horridus). Copeia, 1953:212-215.

1953. Differences in venom samples from copperheads (Agkistrodon contortrix mokeson) and timber rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus horridus). Copeia, 1953:212-215.

1954. Polyvalent antivenin in the treatment of experimental snake venom poisoning. Amer. Jour. Trop. Med. and Hyg., 3:1077-1082.

1954. Multivalent antivenom for treating experimental snake venom poisoning. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 3:1077-1082.

1956. Some properties of North American pit viper venoms and their correlation with phylogeny. Pp. 145-151 in Venoms (ed. Buckley, E. E., and Porges, N., Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Publ. No. 44).

1956. Characteristics of North American pit viper venoms and their connection to evolutionary history. Pp. 145-151 in Venoms (edited by Buckley, E. E., and Porges, N., Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Publ. No. 44).

Munro, D. F.

Munro, D. F.

1949. Effect of DDT powder on small cottonmouths. Herpetologica, 5:71-72.

1949. Effect of DDT powder on small cottonmouths. Herpetologica, 5:71-72.

1950. Additional observations on head bobbing by snakes. Herpetologica, 6:88.

1950. Additional observations on head bobbing in snakes. Herpetologica, 6:88.

Neill, W. T.

Neill, W. T.

1947. Size and habits of the cottonmouth moccasin. Herpetologica, 3:203-205.

1947. The size and behavior of the cottonmouth moccasin. Herpetologica, 3:203-205.

1949. Head bobbing, a widespread habit of snakes. Herpetologica, 5:114-115.

1949. Head bobbing, a common behavior in snakes. Herpetologica, 5:114-115.

1960. The caudal lure of various juvenile snakes. Quart. Jour. Florida Acad. Sci., 23(3):173-200, 2 figs.

1960. The appeal of tails in various young snakes. Quart. Jour. Florida Acad. Sci., 23(3):173-200, 2 figs.

Neill, W. T., and Allen, E. R.

Neill, W. T., and Allen, E. R.

1955. Metachrosis in snakes. Quart. Jour. Florida Acad. Sci., 18(3):207-215.

1955. Color change in snakes. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences, 18(3):207-215.

Netting, M. G.

Netting, M. G.

1929. The venom of Sistrurus catenatus. Bull. Antivenin Inst. Amer., 2(4):108-109.

1929. The venom of Sistrurus catenatus. Bulletin of the Antivenin Institute of America, 2(4):108-109.

Parrish, H. M.

Parrish, H. M.

1959. Poisonous snakebites resulting in lack of venom poisoning. Virginia Med. Month, 86:396-401.

1959. Poisonous snakebites that result in no venom poisoning. Virginia Med. Month, 86:396-401.

1963. Analysis of 460 fatalities from venomous animals in the United States. Amer. Jour. Med. Sci., 245(2):35-47.

1963. Study of 460 deaths caused by venomous animals in the United States. Amer. Jour. Med. Sci., 245(2):35-47.

Parrish, H. M., and Pollard, C. B.

Parrish, H.M., and Pollard, C.B.

1959. Effects of repeated poisonous snakebite in man. Amer. Jour. Med. Sci., 237(3):277-286.

1959. Impact of multiple venomous snakebites on humans. American Journal of Medical Sciences, 237(3):277-286.

Penn, G. H.

Penn, G. H.

1943. Herpetological notes from Cameron Parish, Louisiana. Copeia, 1943(1):58-59.

1943. Observations on reptiles and amphibians from Cameron Parish, Louisiana. Copeia, 1943(1):58-59.

Perkins, C. B.

Perkins, C. B.

1955. Longevity of snakes in captivity in the United States. Copeia, 1955(3):262.

1955. Lifespan of snakes in captivity in the U.S. Copeia, 1955(3):262.

Pope, C. H., and Perkins, R. M.

Pope, C.H., and Perkins, R. M.

1944. Differences in the patterns of bites of venomous and of harmless snakes. Archives of Surgery, 49:331-336.

1944. Differences in the bite patterns of poisonous and non-poisonous snakes. Archives of Surgery, 49:331-336.

Rahn, H.

Rahn, H.

1942. The reproductive cycle of the prairie rattler. Copeia, 1942(4):233-240.

1942. The breeding cycle of the prairie rattlesnake. Copeia, 1942(4):233-240.

Ramsey, L. W.

Ramsey, L.W.

1948. Combat dance and range extension of Agkistrodon piscivorus leucostoma. Herpetologica, 4:228.

1948. Combat dance and range expansion of Agkistrodon piscivorus leucostoma. Herpetologica, 4:228.

Richmond, M. D.

Richmond, MD

1952. Head bobbing in reptiles. Herpetologica, 8:38.

1952. Movement of the head in reptiles. Herpetologica, 8:38.

Rosenfeld, S., and Glass, S.

Rosenfeld, S., and Glass, S.

1940. The inhibiting effect of snake bloods upon the hemorrhagic action of viper venoms on mice. Amer. Jour. Med. Sci., 199:482-486.

1940. The inhibitory effect of snake blood on bleeding caused by viper venom in mice. Amer. Jour. Med. Sci., 199:482-486.

Schmidt, K. P.

Schmidt, K. P.

1946. On the zoogeography of the Holarctic region. Copeia, 1946:144-152.

1946. On the animal distribution of the Holarctic region. Copeia, 1946:144-152.

Shaw, C. E.

Shaw, C. E.

1948. The male combat "dance" of some crotalid snakes. Herpetologica, 4:137-145.

1948. The mating "dance" of male rattlesnake species. Herpetologica, 4:137-145.

1951. Male combat in American colubrid snakes with remarks on combat in other colubrid and elapid snakes. Herpetologica, 7(4):149-168.

1951. Male combat in American colubrid snakes, with remarks on combat in other colubrid and elapid snakes. Herpetologica, 7(4):149-168.

Smith, H. M.

Smith, H. M.

1956. Handbook of amphibians and reptiles of Kansas. 2nd Edition. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist., Misc. Publ., 9:1-356, 253 figs.

1956. Handbook of amphibians and reptiles of Kansas. 2nd Edition. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Miscellaneous Publications, 9:1-356, 253 figures.

Smith, H. M., and Buechner, H. K.

Smith, H.M., and Buechner, H.K.

1947. The influence of the Balcones Escarpment on the distribution of amphibians and reptiles in Texas. Bull. Chicago Acad. Sci., pp. 1-16.

1947. How the Balcones Escarpment affects the distribution of amphibians and reptiles in Texas. Bull. Chicago Acad. Sci., pp. 1-16.

Smith, P. W.

Smith, P. W.

1961. The amphibians and reptiles of Illinois. Illinois Nat. Hist. Survey, 28(1):1-298.

1961. The amphibians and reptiles of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey, 28(1):1-298.

Smith, P. W., and List, J. C.

Smith, P.W., and List, J.C.

1955. Notes on Mississippi amphibians and reptiles. Amer. Midl. Nat., 53(1):115-125.

1955. Notes on amphibians and reptiles of Mississippi. American Midland Naturalist, 53(1): 115-125.

Sowder, W. T., and Gehres, G. W.

Sowder, W.T., and Gehres, G.W.

1963. Snakebites in Florida. Jour. Florida Med. Assn., 49(12):973-976.

1963. Snakebites in Florida. Journal of the Florida Medical Association, 49(12):973-976.

Stabler, R. M.

Stabler, R. M.

1951. Some observations on two cottonmouth moccasins made during 12 and 14 years of captivity. Herpetologica, 7:89-92.

1951. Observations on two cottonmouth moccasins observed during 12 and 14 years in captivity. Herpetologica, 7:89-92.

Stahnke, H. M.

Stahnke, H. M.

1953. The L-C treatment of venomous bites and stings. Amer. Jour. Trop. Med. and Hyg., 2(1):142-143.

1953. The L-C treatment for venomous bites and stings. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2(1):142-143.

1954. The L-C method of treating venomous bites and stings. Pois. Anim. Res. Lab., Arizona State Coll., 28 pp.

1954. The L-C method for treating poisonous bites and stings. Poisonous Animal Research Laboratory, Arizona State College, 28 pages.

Stejneger, L.

Stejneger, L.

1895. The poisonous snakes of North America. Smithsonian Inst., U. S. Nat. Mus., 1893:337-487, pls. 1-19, figs. 1-70.

1895. The poisonous snakes of North America. Smithsonian Institution, U.S. National Museum, 1893:337-487, plates 1-19, figures 1-70.

Stimson, A. C., and Engelhardt, T. H.

Stimson, A.C., and Engelhardt, T. H.

1960. The treatment of snakebite. Jour. Occ. Med., 2(4):163-168.

1960. Treating snakebites. Jour. Occ. Med., 2(4):163-168.

Sutherland, I. D.

Sutherland, I. D.

1958. The "combat dance" of the timber rattlesnake. Herpetologica, 14(1):23-24.

1958. The "combat dance" of the timber rattlesnake. Herpetologica, 14(1):23-24.

Swanson, P. L.

Swanson, P. L.

1946. Effects of snake venoms on snakes. Copeia, 1946(4):242-249.

1946. The impact of snake venom on snakes. Copeia, 1946(4):242-249.

Swaroop, S., and Grab, B.

Swaroop, S., and Grab, B.

1956. The snakebite mortality problem in the world. Pp. 439-466 in Venoms (ed. Buckley, E. E., and Porges, N., Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Publ. No. 44).

1956. The problem of deaths caused by snakebites globally. Pp. 439-466 in Venoms (ed. Buckley, E. E., and Porges, N., Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Publ. No. 44).

Swartzwelder, J. C.

Swartzwelder, J. C.

1950. Snake-bite accidents in Louisiana with data on 306 cases. Amer. Jour. Trop. Med., 30(4):575-589.

1950. Snakebite incidents in Louisiana with information on 306 cases. Amer. Jour. Trop. Med., 30(4):575-589.

Tinkle, D. W.

Tinkle, D. W.

1962. Reproductive potential and cycles in female Crotalus atrox from northwestern Texas. Copeia, 1962(2):306-313.

1962. Reproductive ability and cycles in female Crotalus atrox from northwestern Texas. Copeia, 1962(2):306-313.

Trowbridge, A. H.

Trowbridge, A. H.

1937. Ecological observations on amphibians and reptiles collected in southeastern Oklahoma during the summer of 1934. Amer. Midl. Nat., 18(2):285-303.

1937. Ecological observations on amphibians and reptiles collected in southeastern Oklahoma during the summer of 1934. Amer. Midl. Nat., 18(2):285-303.

Volsøe, H.

Volsøe, H.

1944. Structure and seasonal variation of the male reproductive organs in Vipera berus (L.). Spolia Zool. Mus. Hauniensis V. Reprint, Copenhagen, pp. 1-172.

1944. The structure and seasonal changes of the male reproductive organs in Vipera berus (L.). Spolia Zool. Mus. Hauniensis V. Reprint, Copenhagen, pp. 1-172.

Wharton, C. H.

Wharton, C. H.

1960. Birth and behavior of a brood of cottonmouths, Agkistrodon piscivorus piscivorus, with notes on tail-luring. Herpetologica, 16:125-129.

1960. The birth and behavior of a group of cottonmouths, Agkistrodon piscivorus piscivorus, including observations on tail-luring. Herpetologica, 16:125-129.

Willson, P.

Willson, P.

1908. Snake poisoning in the United States: a study based on an analysis of 740 cases. Arch. Int. Med., 1(5):516-570.

1908. Snake poisoning in the United States: a study based on an analysis of 740 cases. Archives of Internal Medicine, 1(5):516-570.

Wolff, N. O., and Githens, T. S.

Wolff, N.O., and Githens, T.S.

1939a. Record venom extraction from water moccasin. Copeia, 1939(1):52.

1939a. Documenting venom extraction from water moccasins. Copeia, 1939(1):52.

1939b. Yield and toxicity of venom from snakes extracted over a period of two years. Copeia, 1939(4):234.

1939b. The yield and toxicity of venom from snakes collected over two years. Copeia, 1939(4):234.

Wood, J. T.

Wood, J. T.

1954a. The distribution of poisonous snakes in Virginia. Virginia Jour. Sci., 5(3):152-167, 4 maps.

1954a. The distribution of venomous snakes in Virginia. Virginia Journal of Science, 5(3):152-167, 4 maps.

1954b. A survey of 200 cases of snake-bite in Virginia. Amer. Jour. Trop. Med. and Hyg., 3(5):936-943.

1954b. A study of 200 snakebite cases in Virginia. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 3(5):936-943.

Wood, J. T., Hoback, W. W., and Green, T. W.

Wood, J.T., Hoback, W.W., and Green, T.W.

1955. Treatment of snake venom poisoning with ACTH and cortisone. Virginia Med. Month, 82:130-135.

1955. Treating snake venom poisoning with ACTH and cortisone. Virginia Med. Month, 82:130-135.

Wright, A. H., and Wright, A. A.

Wright, A.H., and Wright, A.A.

1957. Handbook of snakes of the United States and Canada. Comstock Publ. Assoc., Cornell Univ. Press, 2:ix + 565-1106 pp.

1957. Handbook of Snakes of the United States and Canada. Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, 2: ix + 565-1106 pp.

Yamaguti, S.

Yamaguti, S.

1958. Systema helminthum. Interscience Publ., Inc., New York, 3 vols., 5 parts, 1:xi + 1575 pp., 2:vii + 860 pp., 3:1261 pp.

1958. Systema helminthum. Interscience Publ., Inc., New York, 3 volumes, 5 parts, Volume 1: xi + 1575 pages, Volume 2: vii + 860 pages, Volume 3: 1261 pages.

Yerger, R. W.

Yerger, R. W.

1953. Yellow bullhead preyed upon by cottonmouth moccasin. Copeia, 1953(2):115.

1953. A cottonmouth moccasin ate a yellow bullhead. Copeia, 1953(2):115.

Transmitted June 20, 1966.

Sent June 20, 1966.




UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY

Institutional libraries interested in publications exchange may obtain this series by addressing the Exchange Librarian, University of Kansas Library, Lawrence, Kansas. Copies for individuals, persons working in a particular field of study, may be obtained by addressing instead the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas. When copies are requested from the Museum, 25 cents should be included (for each 100 pages or part thereof) for the purpose of defraying the costs of wrapping and mailing. For certain longer papers an additional amount indicated below, toward the cost of production, is to be included. Materials published to date in this series are as follows.

Institutional libraries interested in exchanging publications can get this series by contacting the Exchange Librarian at the University of Kansas Library in Lawrence, Kansas. Individuals or those working in a specific field of study can obtain copies by reaching out to the Museum of Natural History at the University of Kansas, also in Lawrence, Kansas. When requesting copies from the Museum, please include 25 cents for each 100 pages or part thereof to help cover wrapping and mailing costs. For some longer papers, an additional amount listed below should be added to cover production costs. The materials published in this series so far are as follows.

* An asterisk designates those numbers of which the Museum's supply (not necessarily
the Library's supply) is exhausted. Materials published to date, in this series, are as
follows:

Vol. 1. Nos. 1-26 and index. Pp. 1-638, 1946-1950.

*Vol. 2. (Complete) Mammals of Washington. By Walter W. Dalquest. Pp. 1-444, 140 figures in text. April 9, 1948.

*Vol. 3. Nos. 1-4 and index. Pp. 1-681. 1951.

*Vol. 4. (Complete) American weasels. By E. Raymond Hall. Pp. 1-466, 41 plates, 31 figures in text. December 27, 1951.

Vol. 5. Nos. 1-37 and index. Pp. 1-676, 1951-1953.

*Vol. 6. (Complete) Mammals of Utah, taxonomy and distribution. By Stephen D. Durrant. Pp. 1-549, 91 figures in text, 30 tables. August 10, 1952.

Vol. 7. Nos. 1-15 and index. Pp. 1-651, 1952-1955.

Vol. 8. Nos. 1-10 and index. Pp. 1-675, 1954-1956.

Vol. 9. Nos. 1-23 and index. Pp. 1-690, 1955-1960.

Vol. 10. Nos. 1-10 and index. Pp. 1-626, 1956-1960.

Vol. 11. Nos. 1-10 and index. Pp. 1-703, 1958-1960.

Vol. 12.  *1. Functional morphology of three bats: Eumops, Myotis, Macrotus. By Terry
A. Vaughan. Pp. 1-153, 4 plates, 24 figures in text. July 8, 1959.

*2. The ancestry of modern Amphibia: a review of the evidence. By Theodore
H. Eaton, Jr.  Pp. 155-180, 10 figures in text. July 10, 1959.

3. The baculum in microtine rodents. By Sydney Anderson. Pp. 181-216, 49
figures in text. February 19, 1960.

*4. A new order of fishlike Amphibia from the Pennsylvanian of Kansas. By
Theodore H. Eaton, Jr., and Peggy Lou Stewart. Pp. 217-240, 12 figures in
text. May 2, 1960.

5. Natural history of the Bell Vireo. By Jon C. Barlow. Pp. 241-296, 6 figures
in text. March 7, 1962.

6. Two new pelycosaurs from the lower Permian of Oklahoma. By Richard C.
Fox. Pp. 297-307, 6 figures in text. May 21, 1962.

7. Vertebrates from the barrier island of Tamaulipas, México. By Robert K.
Selander, Richard F. Johnston, B. J. Wilks, and Gerald G. Raun. Pp. 309-345,
plates 5-8. June 18, 1962.

8. Teeth of edestid sharks. By Theodore H. Eaton, Jr. Pp. 347-362, 10 figures
in text. October 1, 1962.

9. Variation in the muscles and nerves of the leg in two genera of grouse
(Tympanuchus and Pedioecetes). By E. Bruce Holmes. Pp. 363-474, 20
figures. October 25, 1962. $1.00.

10. A new genus of Pennsylvanian fish (Crossopterygii, Coelacanthiformes) from
Kansas. By Joan Echols. Pp. 475-501, 7 figures. October 25, 1963.

11. Observations on the Mississippi Kite in southwestern Kansas. By Henry S.
Fitch. Pp. 503-519. October 25, 1963.

12. Jaw musculature of the Mourning and White-winged doves. By Robert L.
Merz. Pp. 521-551, 22 figures. October 25, 1963.

13. Thoracic and coracoid arteries in two families of birds, Columbidae and
Hirundinidae. By Marion Anne Jenkinson. Pp. 553-573, 7 figures. March
2, 1964.

14. The breeding birds of Kansas. By Richard F. Johnston. Pp. 575-655, 10
figures. May 18, 1964. 75 cents.

15. The adductor muscles of the jaw in some primitive reptiles. By Richard C.
Fox. Pp. 657-680, 11 figures in text. May 18, 1964.

Index. Pp. 681-694.

Vol. 13. 1. Five natural hybrid combinations in minnows (Cyprinidae). By Frank B.
Cross and W. L. Minckley. Pp. 1-18. June 1, 1960.

2. A distributional study of the amphibians of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec,
México. By William E. Duellman. Pp. 19-72, plates 1-8, 3 figures in text.
August 16, 1960. 50 cents.

3. A new subspecies of the slider turtle (Pseudemys scripta) from Coahuila,
México.  By John M. Legler.  Pp. 73-84, plates 9-12, 3 figures in text.
August 16, 1960.

*4. Autecology of the copperhead. By Henry S. Fitch. Pp. 85-288, plates 13-20,
26 figures in text. November 30, 1960.

5. Occurrence of the garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis, in the Great Plains and
Rocky Mountains. By Henry S. Fitch and T. Paul Maslin. Pp. 289-308,
4 figures in text. February 10, 1961.

6. Fishes of the Wakarusa River in Kansas. By James E. Deacon and Artie L.
Metcalf. Pp. 309-322, 1 figure in text. February 10, 1961.

7. Geographic variation in the North American cyprinid fish, Hybopsis gracilis.
By Leonard J. Olund and Frank B. Cross. Pp. 323-348, plates 21-24, 2
figures in text. February 10, 1961.

8. Descriptions of two species of frogs, genus Ptychohyla; studies of American
hylid frogs, V. By William E. Duellman. Pp. 349-357, plate 25, 2
figures in text. April 27, 1961.

9. Fish populations, following a drought, in the Neosho and Marais des Cygnes
rivers of Kansas. By James Everett Deacon. Pp. 359-427, plates 26-30,
3 figures. August 11, 1961. 75 cents.

10. Recent soft-shelled turtles of North America (family Trionychidae).  By
Robert G. Webb. Pp. 429-611, plates 31-54, 24 figures in text. February
16, 1962.  $2.00.

Index. Pp. 613-624.

Vol. 14. 1. Neotropical bats from western México. By Sydney Anderson. Pp. 1-8.
October 24, 1960.

2. Geographic variation in the harvest mouse, Reithrodontomys megalotis, on
the central Great Plains and in adjacent regions.  By J. Knox Jones, Jr.,
and B. Mursaloglu. Pp. 9-27, 1 figure in text. July 24, 1961.

3. Mammals of Mesa Verde National Pork, Colorado. By Sydney Anderson.
Pp. 29-67, plates 1 and 2, 3 figures in text. July 24, 1961.

4. A new subspecies of the black myotis (bat) from eastern Mexico. By E.
Raymond Hall and Ticul Alvarez. Pp. 69-72, 1 figure in text. December
29, 1961.

5. North American yellow bats, "Dasypterus," and a list of the named kinds
of the genus Lasiurus Gray. By E. Raymond Hall and J. Knox Jones, Jr.
Pp. 73-98, 4 figures in text. December 29, 1961.

6. Natural history of the brush mouse (Peromyscus boylii) in Kansas with
description of a new subspecies. By Charles A. Long. Pp. 99-111, 1 figure
in text. December 29, 1961.

7. Taxonomic status of some mice of the Peromyscus boylii group in eastern
Mexico, with description of a new subspecies. By Ticul Alvarez. Pp. 113-120,
1 figure in text. December 29, 1961.

8. A new subspecies of ground squirrel (Spermophilus spilosoma) from Tamaulipas,
Mexico. By Ticul Alvarez. Pp. 121-124. March 7, 1962.

9. Taxonomic status of the free-tailed bat, Tadarida yucatanica Miller. By J.
Knox Jones, Jr., and Ticul Alvarez. Pp. 125-133, 1 figure in text. March 7,
1962.

10. A new doglike carnivore, genus Cynaretus, from the Clarendonian Pliocene,
of Texas. By E. Raymond Hall and Walter W. Dalquest. Pp. 135-138,
2 figures in text. April 30, 1962.

11. A new subspecies of wood rat (Neotoma) from northeastern Mexico. By
Ticul Alvarez. Pp. 139-143, April 30, 1962.

12. Noteworthy mammals from Sinaloa, Mexico. By J. Knox Jones, Jr., Ticul
Alvarez, and M. Raymond Lee. Pp. 145-159. 1 figure in text. May 18,
1962.

13. A new bat (Myotis) from Mexico. By E. Raymond Hall. Pp. 161-164,
1 figure in text. May 21, 1962.

*14. The mammals of Veracruz. By E. Raymond Hall and Walter W. Dalquest.
Pp. 165-362, 2 figures. May 20, 1963. $2.00.

15. The recent mammals of Tamaulipas, México. By Ticul Alvarez. Pp. 363-473,
5 figures in text. May 20, 1963. $1.00.

16. A new subspecies of the fruit-eating bat, Sturnira ludovici, from western
Mexico. By J. Knox Jones, Jr., and Gary L. Phillips. Pp. 475-481, 1 figure
in text. March 2, 1964.

17. Records of the fossil mammal Sinclairella, Family Apatemyidae, from the
Chadronian and Orellan. By William A. Clemens. Pp. 483-491. 2 figures
in text. March 2, 1964.

18. The mammals of Wyoming. By Charles A. Long. Pp. 493-758, 82 figs.
July 6, 1965. $3.00.

Index. Pp. 759-784.

Vol. 15. 1. The amphibians and reptiles of Michoacán, México. By William E. Duellman.
Pp. 1-148, plates 1-6, 11 figures in text. December 20, 1961. $1.50.

2. Some reptiles and amphibians from Korea. By Robert G. Webb, J. Knox
Jones, Jr., and George W. Byers. Pp. 149-173. January 31, 1962.

3. A new species of frog (Genus Tomodactylus) from western México. By
Robert G. Webb. Pp. 175-181, 1 figure in text. March 7, 1962.

4. Type specimens of amphibians and reptiles in the Museum of Natural History,
the University of Kansas. By William E. Duellman and Barbara Berg.
Pp. 183-204. October 26, 1962.

5. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Rainforests of Southern El Petén, Guatemala.
By William E. Duellman. Pp. 205-249, plates 7-10, 6 figures in text. October
4, 1963.

6. A revision of snakes of the genus Conophis (Family Colubridae, from Middle
America). By John Wellman. Pp. 251-295, 9 figures in text. October 4,
1963.

7. A review of the Middle American tree frogs of the genus Ptychohyla. By
William E. Duellman. Pp. 297-349, plates 11-18, 7 figures in text. October
18, 1963. 50 cents.

*8. Natural history of the racer Coluber constrictor. By Henry S. Fitch. Pp.
351-468, plates 19-22, 20 figures in text. December 30, 1963. $1.00.

9. A review of the frogs of the Hyla bistincta group. By William E. Duellman.
Pp. 469-491, 4 figures in text. March 2, 1964.

10. An ecological study of the garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis. By Henry S.
Fitch. Pp. 493-564, plates 23-25, 14 figures in text. May 17, 1965.

11. Breeding cycle in the ground skink, Lygosoma laterale. By Henry S. Fitch
and Harry W. Greene. Pp. 565-575, 3 figures in text. May 17, 1965.

12. Amphibians and reptiles from the Yucatan Peninsula, México. By William
E. Duellman. Pp. 577-614, 1 figure in text. June 22, 1965.

13. A new species of turtle, Genus Kinosternon, from Central America, by John
M. Legler. Pp. 615-625, pls. 26-28, 2 figures in text. July 20, 1965.

14. A biogeographic account of the herpetofauna of Michoacán, México. By
William E. Duellman. Pp. 627-709, pls. 29-36, 5 figures in text. December
30, 1965.

15. Amphibians and reptiles of Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado. By Charles
L. Douglas. Pp. 711-744, pls. 37, 38, 6 figures in text. March 7, 1966.

Index. Pp. 745-770.

Vol. 16. 1. Distribution and taxonomy of Mammals of Nebraska. By J. Knox Jones, Jr.
Pp. 1-356, pls. 1-4, 82 figures in text. October 1, 1964. $3.50.

2. Synopsis of the lagomorphs and rodents of Korea. By J. Knox Jones, Jr.,
and David H. Johnson. Pp. 357-407. February 12, 1965.

3. Mammals from Isla Cozumel, Mexico, with description of a new species of
harvest mouse. By J. Knox Jones, Jr., and Timothy E. Lawlor. Pp. 409-419,
1 figure in text. April 13, 1965.

4. The Yucatan deer mouse, Peromyscus yucatanicus. By Timothy E. Lawlor.
Pp. 421-438, 2 figures in text. July 20, 1965.

5. Bats from Guatemala. By J. Knox Jones, Jr. Pp. 439-472. April 18, 1966.

More numbers will appear in volume 16.

Vol. 17. 1. Localities of fossil vertebrates obtained from the Niobrara Formation (Cretaceous)
of Kansas. By David Bardack. Pp. 1-14. January 22, 1965.

2. Chorda tympani branch of the facial nerve in the middle ear of tetrapods.
By Richard C. Fox. Pp. 15-21, May 22, 1965.

3. Fishes of the Kansas River System in relation to zoogeography of the Great
Plains. By Artie L. Metcalf. Pp. 23-189, 4 figures in text, 51 maps.
March 24, 1966.

4. Factors affecting growth and reproduction of channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus.
By Bill A. Simco and Frank B. Cross. Pp. 191-256, 13 figures in
text. June 6, 1966.

5. A new species of fringe-limbed tree frog, genus Hyla, from Darién, Panamá.
By William E. Duellman. Pp. 257-262, 1 figure in text. June 17, 1966.

6. Taxonomic notes on some Mexican and Central American hylid frogs. By
William E. Duellman. Pp. 263-279. June 17, 1966.

7. Neotropical hylid frogs, genus Smilisca. By William E. Duellman and
Linda Trueb. Pp. 281-375, pls. 1-12, 17 figures in text.  July 14, 1966.

8. Birds from North Borneo. By Max C. Thompson. Pp. 377-433, 1 figure in
text. October 27, 1966.

9. Natural history of cottonmouth moccasin, Agkistrodon piscivorus (Reptilia).
By Ray D. Burkett. Pp. 435-491, 7 figures in text. October 27, 1966.

More numbers will appear in volume 17.

* An asterisk marks those numbers where the Museum's stock (not necessarily
the Library's stock) is depleted. The materials published so far in this series are:

Vol. 1. Nos. 1-26 and index. Pp. 1-638, 1946-1950.

*Vol. 2. (Complete) Mammals of Washington. By Walter W. Dalquest. Pp. 1-444, 140 figures in text. April 9, 1948.

*Vol. 3. Nos. 1-4 and index. Pp. 1-681. 1951.

*Vol. 4. (Complete) American weasels. By E. Raymond Hall. Pp. 1-466, 41 plates, 31 figures in text. December 27, 1951.

Vol. 5. Nos. 1-37 and index. Pp. 1-676, 1951-1953.

*Vol. 6. (Complete) Mammals of Utah, taxonomy and distribution. By Stephen D. Durrant. Pp. 1-549, 91 figures in text, 30 tables. August 10, 1952.

Vol. 7. Nos. 1-15 and index. Pp. 1-651, 1952-1955.

Vol. 8. Nos. 1-10 and index. Pp. 1-675, 1954-1956.

Vol. 9. Nos. 1-23 and index. Pp. 1-690, 1955-1960.

Vol. 10. Nos. 1-10 and index. Pp. 1-626, 1956-1960.

Vol. 11. Nos. 1-10 and index. Pp. 1-703, 1958-1960.

Vol. 12.  *1. Functional morphology of three bats: Eumops, Myotis, Macrotus. By Terry
A. Vaughan. Pages 1-153, 4 plates, 24 figures in the text. July 8, 1959.

*2. The ancestry of modern Amphibia: a review of the evidence. By Theodore
H. Eaton, Jr. Pp. 155-180, 10 figures in the text. July 10, 1959.

3. The baculum in microtine rodents. By Sydney Anderson. Pages 181-216, 49
figures in text. February 19, 1960.

*4. A new group of fish-like amphibians from the Pennsylvanian era in Kansas. By
Theodore H. Eaton, Jr. and Peggy Lou Stewart. Pages 217-240, 12 figures in
May 2, 1960.

5. The Natural History of the Bell Vireo. By Jon C. Barlow. Pages 241-296, 6 figures.
in text. March 7, 1962.

6. Two new pelycosaurs from the Lower Permian period in Oklahoma. By Richard C.
Fox. Pages 297-307, 6 figures in the text. May 21, 1962.

7. Vertebrates from the barrier island of Tamaulipas, Mexico. By Robert K.
Selander, Richard F., Johnston, B. J., Wilks, and Gerald G. Raun. Pages 309-345,
plates 5-8. June 18, 1962.

8. Teeth of edestid sharks. By Theodore H. Eaton, Jr. Pages 347-362, 10 figures.
in text. October 1, 1962.

9. Differences in the muscles and nerves of the leg in two types of grouse
(Tympanuchus and Pedioecetes). By E. Bruce Holmes. Pages 363-474, 20
figures. October 25, 1962. $1.00.

10. A new genus of fish from Pennsylvania (Crossopterygii, Coelacanthiformes) from
Kansas. By Joan Echols. Pages 475-501, 7 figures. October 25, 1963.

11. Observations on the Mississippi Kite in southwestern Kansas. By Henry S.
Fitch. pp. 503-519. October 25, 1963.

12. Jaw muscles of the Mourning and White-winged doves. By Robert L.
Merz. Pages 521-551, 22 figures. October 25, 1963.

13. Thoracic and coracoid arteries in two families of birds, Columbidae and __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
Hirundinidae. By Marion Anne Jenkinson. Pages 553-573, 7 figures. March
February 2, 1964.

14. The breeding birds of Kansas. By Richard F. Johnston. Pages 575-655, 10
Figures. May 18, 1964. 75 cents.

15. The jaw adductor muscles in certain primitive reptiles. By Richard C.
Fox. Pages 657-680, 11 figures in the text. May 18, 1964.

Index. pp. 681-694.

Vol. 13. 1. Five natural hybrid combinations in minnows (Cyprinidae). By Frank B.
Cross and W. L. Minckley. Pages 1-18. June 1, 1960.

2. A distribution study of the amphibians of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec,
Mexico. By William E. Duellman. Pages 19-72, plates 1-8, 3 figures in the text.
August 16, 1960. $0.50.

3. A new subspecies of the slider turtle (Pseudemys scripta) from Coahuila,
Mexico. By John M. Legler. pp. 73-84, plates 9-12, 3 figures in text.
August 16, 1960.

*4. The Autecology of the Copperhead. By Henry S. Fitch. Pages 85-288, plates 13-20,*
26 figures in the text. November 30, 1960.

5. The presence of the garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis, in the Great Plains and
Rocky Mountains. By Henry S. Fitch and T. Paul Maslin. Pages 289-308,
4 figures in text. February 10, 1961.

6. Fish of the Wakarusa River in Kansas. By James E. Deacon and Artie L.
Metcalf. Pages 309-322, 1 figure in the text. February 10, 1961.

7. Geographic variation in the North American minnow, Hybopsis gracilis.
By Leonard J. Olund and Frank B. Cross. Pages 323-348, plates 21-24, 2
figures in text. February 10, 1961.

8. Descriptions of two species of frogs from the genus Ptychohyla; research on American
Hylid frogs, V. By William E. Duellman. Pages 349-357, plate 25, 2.
figures in text. April 27, 1961.

9. Fish populations after a drought in the Neosho and Marais des Cygnes
Rivers of Kansas by James Everett Deacon. Pages 359-427, plates 26-30.
3 figures. August 11, 1961. 75 cents.

10. Recent soft-shelled turtles from North America (family Trionychidae). By
Robert G. Webb. Pages 429-611, plates 31-54, 24 figures in text. February
16, 1962. $2.00.

Index. Pages 613-624.

Vol. 14. 1. Neotropical bats from western México. By Sydney Anderson. Pp. 1-8.
October 24, 1960.

2. Geographic variation in the harvest mouse, Reithrodontomys megalotis, on
the central Great Plains and surrounding areas. By J. Knox Jones, Jr.,
and B. Mursaloglu. Pages 9-27, 1 figure in the text. July 24, 1961.

3. Mammals of Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado. By Sydney Anderson.
Pages 29-67, plates 1 and 2, 3 figures in the text. July 24, 1961.

4. A new subspecies of the black myotis bat from eastern Mexico. By E.
Raymond Hall and Ticul Alvarez. Pages 69-72, 1 figure in the text. December
29, 1961.

5. North American yellow bats, "Dasypterus," and a list of the different types.
of the genus Lasiurus Gray. By E. Raymond Hall and J. Knox Jones, Jr.
Pages 73-98, 4 figures in the text. December 29, 1961.

6. The natural history of the brush mouse (Peromyscus boylii) in Kansas with__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
Description of a new subspecies. By Charles A. Long. Pages 99-111, 1 figure.
in text. December 29, 1961.

7. Taxonomic status of certain mice in the Peromyscus boylii group in the eastern
Mexico, including a description of a new subspecies. By Ticul Alvarez. Pages 113-120,
1 figure in text. December 29, 1961.

8. A new subspecies of ground squirrel (Spermophilus spilosoma) discovered in Tamaulipas,
Mexico. By Ticul Alvarez. Pages 121-124. March 7, 1962.

9. Taxonomic status of the free-tailed bat, Tadarida yucatanica Miller. By J.
Knox Jones, Jr., and Ticul Alvarez. Pages 125-133, 1 figure in text. March 7,
1962.

10. A new dog-like carnivore, genus Cynaretus, from the Clarendonian Pliocene,
of Texas. By E. Raymond Hall and Walter W. Dalquest. Pages 135-138,
2 figures in text. April 30, 1962.

11. A new subspecies of wood rat (Neotoma) from northeastern Mexico. By
Ticul Alvarez. Pages 139-143, April 30, 1962.

12. Significant mammals from Sinaloa, Mexico. By J. Knox Jones, Jr., Ticul
Alvarez and M. Raymond Lee. Pages 145-159. 1 figure included in the text. May 18,
1962.

13. A new bat (Myotis) from Mexico. By E. Raymond Hall. Pages 161-164,
1 figure in text. May 21, 1962.

*14. The Mammals of Veracruz. By E. Raymond Hall and Walter W. Dalquest.
Pages 165-362, 2 figures. May 20, 1963. $2.00.

15. The recent mammals of Tamaulipas, Mexico. By Ticul Alvarez. Pages 363-473,
5 figures in text. May 20, 1963. $1.00.

16. A new subspecies of the fruit-eating bat, Sturnira ludovici, from the western
Mexico. By J. Knox Jones, Jr. and Gary L. Phillips. Pages 475-481, 1 figure.
in text. March 2, 1964.

17. Fossil records of the mammal Sinclairella, from the Family Apatemyidae, are found in the
Chadronian and Orellan. By William A. Clemens. Pages 483-491. 2 figures.
in text. March 2, 1964.

18. The mammals of Wyoming. By Charles A. Long. Pages 493-758, 82 figures.
July 6, 1965. $3.00.

Index. pp. 759-784.

Vol. 15. 1. The amphibians and reptiles of Michoacán, México. By William E. Duellman.
Pages 1-148, plates 1-6, 11 figures in the text. December 20, 1961. $1.50.

2. A few reptiles and amphibians from Korea. By Robert G. Webb, J. Knox
Jones, Jr. and George W. Byers. Pages 149-173. January 31, 1962.

3. A new species of frog (Genus Tomodactylus) has been discovered in western Mexico. By
Robert G. Webb. Pages 175-181, 1 figure included in the text. March 7, 1962.

4. Type specimens of amphibians and reptiles in the Museum of Natural History, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__,
the University of Kansas. By William E. Duellman and Barbara Berg.
Pp. 183-204. October 26, 1962.

5. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Rainforests in Southern El Petén, Guatemala.
By William E. Duellman. Pages 205-249, plates 7-10, 6 figures in the text. October
4, 1963.

6. A review of snakes from the genus Conophis (Family Colubridae, from the Middle
America). By John Wellman. Pages 251-295, 9 figures included in the text. October 4,
1963.

7. A review of the Middle American tree frogs in the genus Ptychohyla. By
William E. Duellman. Pages 297-349, plates 11-18, 7 figures in the text. October
18, 1963. 50 cents.

*8. The natural history of the racer Coluber constrictor. By Henry S. Fitch. Pages.
351-468, plates 19-22, 20 figures in text. December 30, 1963. $1.00.

9. An overview of the frogs in the Hyla bistincta group. By William E. Duellman.
Pages 469-491, 4 figures in the text. March 2, 1964.

10. An ecological study of the garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis. By Henry S.
Fitch. Pages 493-564, plates 23-25, 14 figures in the text. May 17, 1965.

11. Breeding cycle of the ground skink, Lygosoma laterale. By Henry S. Fitch
and Harry W. Greene. Pages 565-575, 3 figures in the text. May 17, 1965.

12. Amphibians and reptiles of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. By William
E. Duellman. Pages 577-614, 1 figure in the text. June 22, 1965.

13. A new species of turtle, Genus Kinosternon, from Central America, by John
M. Legler. Pages 615-625, plates 26-28, 2 figures in the text. July 20, 1965.

14. A biogeographic overview of the herpetofauna in Michoacán, Mexico. By
William E. Duellman. Pages 627-709, plates 29-36, 5 figures in the text. December
30, 1965.

15. Amphibians and reptiles of Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado. By Charles
L. Douglas. Pages 711-744, plates 37, 38, and 6 figures in the text. March 7, 1966.

Index. Pages 745-770.

Vol. 16. 1. Distribution and taxonomy of Mammals of Nebraska. By J. Knox Jones, Jr.
Pages 1-356, please see pages 1-4, 82 figures in the text. October 1, 1964. $3.50.

2. Summary of the lagomorphs and rodents of Korea. By J. Knox Jones, Jr.,
and David H. Johnson. Pages 357-407. February 12, 1965.

3. Mammals from Isla Cozumel, Mexico, including a description of a new species of __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Harvest Mouse. By J. Knox Jones, Jr. and Timothy E. Lawlor. Pages 409-419,
1 figure in the text. April 13, 1965.

4. The Yucatán deer mouse, Peromyscus yucatanicus. By Timothy E. Lawlor.
Pages 421-438, 2 figures in the text. July 20, 1965.

5. Bats from Guatemala. By J. Knox Jones, Jr. Pages 439-472. April 18, 1966.

More numbers will show up in volume 16.

Vol. 17. 1. Localities of fossil vertebrates obtained from the Niobrara Formation (Cretaceous)
of Kansas. By David Bardack. Pages 1-14. January 22, 1965.

2. The chorda tympani branch of the facial nerve in the middle ear of tetrapods.
By Richard C. Fox. Pages 15-21, May 22, 1965.

3. Fish species in the Kansas River System in relation to the zoogeography of the Great
Plains. By Artie L. Metcalf. Pages 23-189, 4 figures in the text, 51 maps.
March 24, 1966.

4. Factors influencing the growth and reproduction of channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus.
By Bill A. Simco and Frank B. Cross. Pages 191-256, 13 figures in
June 6, 1966.

5. A new species of fringe-limbed tree frog, genus Hyla, has been discovered in Darién, Panamá.
By William E. Duellman. Pages 257-262, 1 figure in the text. June 17, 1966.

6. Taxonomic notes on some Mexican and Central American hylid frogs. By
William E. Duellman. Pages 263-279. June 17, 1966.

7. Neotropical hylid frogs, genus Smilisca. By William E. Duellman and
Linda Trueb. Pages 281-375, plates 1-12, 17 figures in the text. July 14, 1966.

8. Birds of North Borneo. By Max C. Thompson. Pages 377-433, 1 figure in
October 27, 1966.

9. Natural history of the cottonmouth moccasin, Agkistrodon piscivorus (Reptilia).
By Ray D. Burkett. Pages 435-491, 7 figures in the text. October 27, 1966.

More numbers will be included in volume 17.




        
        
    
Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!