This is a modern-English version of American Military Insignia, 1800-1851, originally written by Campbell, J. Duncan, (James Duncan). It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.


SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM

Smithsonian Institution
United States National Museum

BULLETIN 235
WASHINGTON, D.C.
1963

BULLETIN 235
WASHINGTON, D.C.
1963

Publications of the United States National Museum

The scholarly publications of the United States National Museum include two series, Proceedings of the United States National Museum and United States National Museum Bulletin.

The scholarly publications of the United States National Museum include two series, Proceedings of the United States National Museum and United States National Museum Bulletin.

In these series are published original articles and monographs dealing with the collections and work of the Museum and setting forth newly acquired facts in the fields of Anthropology, Biology, History, Geology, and Technology. Copies of each publication are distributed to libraries and scientific organizations and to specialists and others interested in the different subjects.

In this series, original articles and monographs are published that focus on the collections and work of the Museum, presenting newly acquired information in Anthropology, Biology, History, Geology, and Technology. Copies of each publication are sent to libraries, scientific organizations, specialists, and others interested in these various subjects.

The Proceedings, begun in 1878, are intended for the publication, in separate form, of shorter papers. These are gathered in volumes, octavo in size, with the publication date of each paper recorded in the table of contents in the volume.

The Proceedings, started in 1878, are meant for publishing shorter papers individually. These are compiled into volumes, in octavo size, with each paper's publication date listed in the table of contents of the volume.

In the Bulletin series, the first of which was issued in 1875, appear longer, separate publications consisting of monographs (occasionally in several parts) and volumes in which are collected works on related subjects. Bulletins are either octavo or quarto in size, depending on the needs of the presentation. Since 1902 papers relating to the botanical collections of the Museum have been published in the Bulletin series under the heading Contributions from the United States National Herbarium.

In the Bulletin series, which started in 1875, you'll find longer, standalone publications that include monographs (sometimes in multiple parts) and volumes that compile works on related topics. Bulletins come in either octavo or quarto size, depending on what's needed for the presentation. Since 1902, papers related to the museum’s botanical collections have been published in the Bulletin series under the title Contributions from the United States National Herbarium.

This work is number 235 of the Bulletin series.

This work is number 235 of the Bulletin series.

Frank A. Taylor
Director, United States National Museum

Frank A. Taylor
Director, United States National Museum

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C.—Price $2

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 25—Price $2

Shoulder-belt plate of Vermont Militia, attributed to Ethan Allen, about 1785. In collection of Dr. John Lattimer.

Shoulder-belt plate of the Vermont Militia, attributed to Ethan Allen, around 1785. In the collection of Dr. John Lattimer.

MUSEUM OF HISTORY AND TECHNOLOGY

Museum of History and Technology

American Military Insignia
1800-1851

J. Duncan Campbell and Edgar M. Howell

J. Duncan Campbell and Edgar M. Howell

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, WASHINGTON, D.C.
1963

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, WASHINGTON, D.C.
1963

(p. vii) Contents

  •  Page
  • Preface ix
  • Bibliography xiv
  • Introduction 3
  • Organization of the Regular Army 3
  • Organization of the Militia 6
  • Insignia of the Regular Army 7
  • Cap and Helmet Devices 7
  • Shoulder-Belt and Waist-Belt Plates 31
  • Insignia of the Uniformed Militia 51
  • Cap and Helmet Devices 51
  • Shoulder-Belt and Waist-Belt Plates 88

(p. ix) Preface

This catalog is a descriptive and interpretive listing of the insignia of the Army of the United States—other than buttons, epaulets, and horse furniture—in the National Collections that were prescribed or worn during the period 1800-1851. The subject of early American military buttons has been covered by L. F. Emilio in The Emilio Collection of Military Buttons (Salem, Massachusetts: Essex Institute, 1911), W. L. Calver and R. P. Bolton in History Written with Pick and Shovel (New York: New York Historical Society, 1950), and David F. Johnson in Uniform Buttons, American Armed Forces, 1784-1948. (Watkins Glen, New York: Century House, 1948, 2 vols.). For epaulets, see Mendel L. Peterson, "American Army Epaulets, 1814-1872," Military Collector and Historian (March 1961, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-14).

This catalog is a detailed and interpretive listing of the insignia of the Army of the United States—excluding buttons, epaulets, and horse gear—in the National Collections that were used or worn during the period 1800-1851. The topic of early American military buttons has been addressed by L. F. Emilio in The Emilio Collection of Military Buttons (Salem, Massachusetts: Essex Institute, 1911), W. L. Calver and R. P. Bolton in History Written with Pick and Shovel (New York: New York Historical Society, 1950), and David F. Johnson in Uniform Buttons, American Armed Forces, 1784-1948. (Watkins Glen, New York: Century House, 1948, 2 vols.). For epaulets, refer to Mendel L. Peterson, "American Army Epaulets, 1814-1872," Military Collector and Historian (March 1961, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-14).

Most of the specimens described here are from the huge W. Stokes Kirk Collection acquired in 1959, supplemented by the War Department Collection and the numerous biographical collections of the United States National Museum; in addition, a few insignia in the collections of J. Duncan Campbell and others are included.

Most of the specimens described here come from the extensive W. Stokes Kirk Collection acquired in 1959, along with the War Department Collection and various biographical collections from the United States National Museum. Additionally, a few insignia from the collections of J. Duncan Campbell and others are included.

The unique W. Stokes Kirk Collection, unmatched in scope, volume, and rarity, is worthy of special note. It was begun in 1878 by W. Stokes Kirk, Sr., of Philadelphia, a dealer in U.S. Government surplus. Struck by the beautiful design and delicate art work in some of the early insignia, Mr. Kirk put aside all old and unusual devices for his personal collection. As his business expanded, so did his interest in military rarities and curios. After each bulk purchase from government sources, he would have all the odd and unusual items sorted out for his examination. The best of such items went into his personal collection, which included rare firearms, powder flasks, insignia, epaulets, military caps, and the like. W. Stokes Kirk, Jr., who succeeded his father and expanded the business nationally until it became almost as well known as Bannerman's Military Store in New York City, maintained and enlarged the collection. After his death, in 1946, the collection was continued by his widow, Mrs. Linnie A. Kirk Mosler. Items in this catalog from the W. Stokes Kirk Collection are indicated by the letters "S-K" in parentheses following the United States National Museum number.

The distinct W. Stokes Kirk Collection, unparalleled in scope, volume, and rarity, deserves special recognition. It was started in 1878 by W. Stokes Kirk, Sr., from Philadelphia, who dealt in U.S. Government surplus. Captivated by the beautiful design and intricate artwork of some early insignia, Mr. Kirk set aside all old and unusual pieces for his personal collection. As his business grew, so did his interest in military rarities and curiosities. After every large purchase from government sources, he would have all the odd and unique items separated for his review. The best of these items were added to his personal collection, which included rare firearms, powder flasks, insignia, epaulets, military caps, and similar objects. W. Stokes Kirk, Jr., who took over from his father and expanded the business nationally until it became almost as renowned as Bannerman's Military Store in New York City, continued to maintain and grow the collection. After his passing in 1946, the collection was preserved by his widow, Mrs. Linnie A. Kirk Mosler. Items in this catalog from the W. Stokes Kirk Collection are marked with the letters "S-K" in parentheses following the United States National Museum number.

Although this catalog is, in more than one sense, a developmental history of American military insignia, it is not, and is not intended to be, a definitive study. The picture is far too incomplete. Whereas the record of Regular Army devices after 1821 is fairly clear—despite the fact that the uniform regulations continued sometimes to use the tantalizing phrase "according to pattern"—there remain serious gaps in the pre-1821 period when regulations were exceedingly vague and fragmentary at best; (p. x) for example, the badges of the Regiment of Light Artillery (1812-1821). These gaps will be filled only by excavating at sites known to have been occupied by specific Regular units during particular periods. Indeed, since this study was begun, four unique and significant insignia were excavated at the site of a War of 1812 cantonment, and these greatly enrich our knowledge of the period.

Although this catalog serves as a developmental history of American military insignia in more ways than one, it is not, and is not meant to be, a comprehensive study. The picture is still far too incomplete. While the record of Regular Army devices after 1821 is relatively clear—despite the uniform regulations sometimes using the intriguing phrase "according to pattern"—there are significant gaps in the pre-1821 period when regulations were extremely vague and often incomplete; (p. x) for instance, the badges of the Regiment of Light Artillery (1812-1821). These gaps can only be filled by excavating at sites known to have been occupied by specific Regular units during certain periods. In fact, since this study began, four unique and important insignia have been uncovered at a War of 1812 cantonment site, greatly enhancing our understanding of that time.

The record of insignia of the veritable multitude of independent uniformed Militia companies in existence during the period under consideration may never be complete. The selection presented here, however, is an excellent representative chronological cross section of typical designs and variations of insignia worn by the uniformed or "volunteer" Militia, as opposed to the "common" or "standing" Militia.

The documentation of the insignias from the numerous independent uniformed militia companies that existed during this time may never be fully comprehensive. The selection shown here, however, provides a great representative chronological overview of the typical designs and variations of insignia worn by the uniformed or "volunteer" militia, as opposed to the "regular" or "standing" militia.

The best sources of documentation and dating for Regular Army devices are the uniform regulations and ordnance regulations; these are supplemented by pertinent records in the National Archives, notably the letter files of the Purveyor of Public Supplies and of the Commissary General of Purchases. The letter files are voluminous, but in some cases badly mixed and in many cases incomplete. We have conjectured a reason for this incompleteness. The two prime contractors for military insignia during the period 1812-1821 were George Armitage and William Crumpton, both of whom had their small factories in Philadelphia within a mile of the office of Callendar Irvine, Commissary General of Purchases. The paucity of written transactions in the records in the National Archives between these gentlemen and Irvine tends to bear out our assumption that most of their dealings were conducted verbally in Irvine's office. This would account for the lack of sketches and drawings of cap plates and belt plates in files of the National Archives. In cases where no specific documentary evidence is available, dating has been based on a careful evaluation of design development and comparison with biographical specimens that can be more fairly dated through knowledge of the former owner's career. Excavated insignia from datable sites have also reduced the problem considerably.

The best sources for documentation and dating of Regular Army items are the uniform regulations and ordnance regulations. These are backed up by relevant records in the National Archives, particularly the letter files of the Purveyor of Public Supplies and the Commissary General of Purchases. The letter files are extensive, but in some instances, they are disorganized and often incomplete. We suspect a reason for this lack of completeness. The two main contractors for military insignia during the period from 1812 to 1821 were George Armitage and William Crumpton, both of whom had small factories in Philadelphia, just a mile from the office of Callendar Irvine, the Commissary General of Purchases. The limited written records in the National Archives between these two and Irvine supports our belief that most of their interactions were handled verbally in Irvine's office. This might explain the absence of sketches and drawings of cap plates and belt plates in the National Archives files. When specific documentary evidence is not available, dating has relied on a careful analysis of design evolution and comparisons with biographical examples that can be more accurately dated based on knowledge of the former owner's career. Insignia found at excavated sites that can be dated have also helped significantly reduce this issue.

For Militia insignia worn about 1835, the best documentation is to be found in U.S. Military Magazine, published between 1839 and 1842 by Huddy and Duval of Philadelphia, and in New York Military Magazine, published by Labree and Stockton of New York during 1841. In 1939, Frederick P. Todd described the Huddy and Duval prints in detail (Journal of the American Military Institute, 1939, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 166-176). However, evaluation and consideration of over-all design development and comparison with dated biographical specimens of the earlier period, before 1835, are difficult and must be done cautiously, as there is no orderly pattern. One generalization does seem clear: during the decade after 1821, when the Regulars discarded large cap plates, the Militia almost universally adopted them and continued to wear them well into the 1840's. Very few insignia include the maker's name or initials, but when they do, bracketing within a definite period is relatively easy. Similarly, when a cap plate appears to be original to a cap, the design of the cap and its maker's label, if included, are of great help. Finally, when there is nothing else to rely on, the "feel" of the specimen, gained through the experience of studying several thousand, has been used, although with reluctance.

For militia insignia worn around 1835, the best documentation can be found in U.S. Military Magazine, which was published between 1839 and 1842 by Huddy and Duval in Philadelphia, and in New York Military Magazine, published by Labree and Stockton in New York during 1841. In 1939, Frederick P. Todd described the Huddy and Duval prints in detail (Journal of the American Military Institute, 1939, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 166-176). However, evaluating and comparing the overall design development with dated biographical examples from the earlier period, before 1835, is challenging and should be approached cautiously, as there is no consistent pattern. One observation does seem clear: during the decade after 1821, when the Regulars stopped using large cap plates, the Militia almost universally adopted them and continued wearing them well into the 1840s. Very few insignia feature the maker's name or initials, but when they do, it’s relatively easy to bracket them within a specific time frame. Similarly, when a cap plate appears to be original to a cap, the design of the cap and its maker's label, if present, are very helpful. Finally, when there’s nothing else to rely on, the “feel” of the specimen, developed through examining several thousand, has been used, although reluctantly.

The year 1800 was selected as the opening date of the study because it was in that year that the first metal ornament was prescribed to designate a particular branch of service. The closing date of 1851 was chosen because Regular Army devices for that year and thereafter are well documented in uniform regulations, manuals, and catalogs of manufacturers such as William Horstmann and Sons. Militia dress after that general date becomes so increasingly complex that it should be attempted only as a separate study.

The year 1800 was chosen as the starting point of the study because it was when the first metal ornament was introduced to represent a specific branch of service. The end date of 1851 was selected because Regular Army devices from that year onward are well documented in uniform regulations, manuals, and catalogs from manufacturers like William Horstmann and Sons. After that general date, militia uniforms become so complex that they should be examined as a separate study.

(p. xi) Most of the specimens described in this study were struck from steel dies; however—despite the relative wealth of knowledge on the striking of coins—little is known of the exact process, especially prior to the appearance of the punch press in the 1830's. Several insignia dies dating as early as the War of 1812 period and a number dating in the 1840's do exist, however. All of these examined were found to be female dies, with the design in intaglio rather than in relief. The design was worked into the die—the art generally termed "die-sinking"—in the same basic manner as in coin dies. The die sinker first softened the steel to suit his particular taste and then incised the design, using a succession of small chisels. The steel was then retempered to withstand high impact pressures. Although there is no documentation on the subject, manufacturing techniques of the period indicate that the following process was probably employed: the die was locked in place at the base of a drop press, similar to a guillotine, so that it could be struck accurately from above; a piece of pure lead was then affixed to the bottom of the weighted drop and allowed to strike the die a sufficient number of times to completely receive the impression of the die and become, in effect, a male counterpart; lastly, a thin sheet of brass, copper, or pewter was placed on the female die and struck with the weighted lead male, receiving the desired impression but without the excessive stretching and resultant cracking that a steel-on-steel strike might have produced. Examination of finished products in the national collections bears out this theory of production; few if any of the specimens show evidence of having been struck with a steel male die.

(p. xi) Most of the items discussed in this study were made using steel dies; however—despite the relatively extensive understanding of coin striking—there's not much known about the specific process, especially before the punch press emerged in the 1830s. There are several insignia dies from as early as the War of 1812 period and a few from the 1840s that exist, though. All of those examined were found to be female dies, with the design in intaglio rather than in relief. The design was carved into the die—an art commonly known as "die-sinking"—in the same basic way as coin dies. The die sinker first softened the steel to his liking and then carved the design, using a series of small chisels. The steel was then re-tempered to withstand high impact pressures. Although there’s no documentation on this topic, manufacturing techniques of the time suggest the following process was likely used: the die was secured at the base of a drop press, similar to a guillotine, so that it could be struck accurately from above; a piece of pure lead was then attached to the bottom of the weighted drop and allowed to strike the die enough times to fully take the impression of the die and become, in essence, a male counterpart; finally, a thin sheet of brass, copper, or pewter was placed on the female die and struck with the weighted lead male, capturing the desired impression without the excessive stretching and cracking that a steel-on-steel strike might have caused. Examination of finished products in national collections supports this theory of production; few, if any, of the specimens show signs of being struck with a steel male die.

With only a few exceptions, all specimens have been photographed on a 1-inch grid. All references to right and left are made according to heraldic usage; the heraldic right is always on the left as viewed.

With a few exceptions, all specimens have been photographed on a 1-inch grid. All references to right and left follow heraldic conventions; the heraldic right is always on the left when viewed.

During the months this work has been in progress, many people and institutions have generously assisted in many ways. It is a pleasure to thank them for their help.

During the months this work has been in progress, many people and institutions have generously assisted in numerous ways. It’s a pleasure to thank them for their support.

Mr. Detmar Finke of the Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, reviewed the Regular Army portions of the manuscript and made many valuable suggestions. Mr. Frederick P. Todd, director of The West Point Museum, graciously answered many questions relative to both Regular Army and Militia insignia. Through the courtesy of Mr. James Koping and Miss Elizabeth Ulrich of the Pennsylvania State Library, The U.S. Military Magazine of Huddy and Duval was made available for unlimited use.

Mr. Detmar Finke from the Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, reviewed the Regular Army sections of the manuscript and offered many valuable suggestions. Mr. Frederick P. Todd, director of The West Point Museum, kindly answered numerous questions about both Regular Army and Militia insignia. Thanks to Mr. James Koping and Miss Elizabeth Ulrich from the Pennsylvania State Library, The U.S. Military Magazine of Huddy and Duval was made available for unlimited use.

Thanks are also given to the following, who furnished photographs of specimens in their collections: Mr. Waverly P. Lewis, Devon, Connecticut; Mr. William E. Codd, Monkton, Maryland; The Filson Club, Louisville, Kentucky; The West Point Museum; The Fort Sill Museum; Old Fort Erie Museum, Ontario, Canada; The Niagara Historical Society Museum, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, Canada; The Washington County Historical Society Museum, Fort Calhoun, Nebraska; the Valley Forge Chapel Museum, and Dr. John Lattimer, New York City.

Thanks are also given to the following people and organizations who provided photographs of specimens from their collections: Mr. Waverly P. Lewis, Devon, Connecticut; Mr. William E. Codd, Monkton, Maryland; The Filson Club, Louisville, Kentucky; The West Point Museum; The Fort Sill Museum; Old Fort Erie Museum, Ontario, Canada; The Niagara Historical Society Museum, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, Canada; The Washington County Historical Society Museum, Fort Calhoun, Nebraska; the Valley Forge Chapel Museum; and Dr. John Lattimer, New York City.

Mr. Michael Arpad of Washington, D.C., was especially helpful in matters pertaining to the techniques of chasing and die sinking.

Mr. Michael Arpad from Washington, D.C., was particularly helpful with techniques related to chasing and die sinking.

J. Duncan Campbell
Edgar M. Howell

J. Duncan Campbell
Edgar M. Howell

March 1, 1963.

March 1, 1963.

(p. xiii) Bibliography

The following works have been used in gathering the material for this book. They are frequently referred to in the text in shortened form.

The following works have been used to gather the material for this book. They are often referenced in the text in abbreviated form.

  • American military history, 1607-1953. (ROTC Manual 145-20, Department of the Army.) Washington, 1956.
  • American state papers, class V, military affairs. Vol. 1. Washington: Gales and Seaton, 1832.
  • Ansell, S. T. Legal and historical aspects of the Militia. Yale Law Journal (April 1917), vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 471-480.
  • Barnes, R.M. Military uniforms of Britain and the Empire. London: Seeley Service and Co., 1960.
  • Belote, Theodore T. American and European swords in the historical collections of the United States National Museum. (U.S. National Museum Bulletin 163.) Washington, 1932.
  • A bit of U.S. Mint history. American Journal of Numismatics (1908), vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 45-50.
  • Calver, W.L., and Bolton, R.P. History written with pick and shovel. New York: New York Historical Society, 1950.
  • Chamberlain, Georgia S. Moritz Furst, die-sinker and artist. The Numismatist. (June 1954), vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 588-592.
  • Davis, Gherardi. The colors of the United States Army, 1789-1912. New York: Privately printed, 1912.
  • Emilio, L.F. The Emilio collection of military buttons. Salem, Massachusetts: Essex Institute, 1911.
  • Finke, Detmar H. Insignia of rank in the Continental Army, 1775-1783. Military Collector and Historian (fall 1956), vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 71-73.
  • General regulations for the Army. Philadelphia: M. Carey and Sons, 1821.
  • General regulations for the Army of the United States. Washington: Department of the Army, 1835.
  • General regulations for the Army of the United States, 1847. Washington: J. and G. S. Gideon, 1847.
  • Gronert, T.G. The first national pastime in the Middle West. Indiana Magazine of History (September 1933), vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 171-186.
  • History of the organization of the United States cavalry. MS, Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C.
  • (p. xiv) Hopkins, Alfred F. Volunteer corps hat of 1814. Military Affairs (winter 1941), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 271-272.
  • David F. Johnson Uniform buttons, American armed forces, 1784-1948. 2 vols. Watkins Glen, New York: Century House, 1948.
  • Willard L. Jones History of the organization of the United States Field Artillery. MS, Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C.
  • Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789. Edit. Worthington Chauncey Ford and others. 34 vols. Washington: Carnegie Foundation, 1904-1937.
  • Kivett, Marvin F. Excavations at Fort Atkinson, Nebraska, a preliminary report. Nebraska History (March 1959), vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 39-66.
  • Knox papers. MSS Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.
  • Kuhn, Edward C. U.S. Army colors and standards of 1808. Military Affairs (winter 1941), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 263-267.
  • Charles W. Lefferts Uniforms of the American, British, French, and German Armies in the War of the American Revolution. New York: New York Historical Society, 1926.
  • Lewis, Waverly P. U.S. military headgear, 1770-1880. Devon, Connecticut: Privately printed, 1960.
  • Lundeberg, Philip K. A history of the North Carolina Militia, 1784-1848. Master's dissertation, Duke University, 1947.
  • John K. Mahon The citizen soldier in national defense, 1789-1815. Doctor's dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles, 1950.
  • ——. History of the organization of the United States Infantry. (Pp. 1-61 in vol. 2 of The Army lineage book, Washington: Department of the Army, 1953.)
  • McBarron, H. Charles. Regiment of Riflemen, winter uniform, 1812-1815. Military Collector and Historian (December 1954), vol. 6, no. 4, p. 100.
  • ——. The 18th U.S. Infantry Regiment, 1814-1815. Military Collector and Historian (summer 1955), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 48-49.
  • McClellan, E.N. Uniforms of the American Marines, 1775 to 1827. Mimeographed in 1932 by Marine Corps Historical Section, Department of the Navy, Washington, D.C.
  • The military laws of the United States. Edit. John F. Callan. Philadelphia: George W. Childes, 1863.
  • New York Military Magazine (1841).
  • Official Army register, corrected to October 31, 1848. Washington, 1848.
  • Official drawings for the U.S. Army uniform regulations of 1851. Military Collector and Historian, vol. 10, no. 1 (spring 1958), pp. 17-19; vol. 10, no. 2 (summer 1958), pp. 43-45.
  • Old Print Shop Portfolio (May 1961), vol. 20, no. 9.
  • Maj. H. G. Parkyn Shoulder-belt plates and buttons. Aldershot, Hants, England: Gale and Polden, Ltd., 1956.
  • Patterson, C. Meade. The military rifle flasks of 1832 and 1837. Military Collector and Historian (March 1953), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7-12.
  • Harold L. Peterson The American sword, New Hope, Pennsylvania: The River House, 1954.
  • Peterson, Mendel L. American Army epaulets, 1841-1872. Military Collector and Historian (March 1951), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-14.
  • George Henry Preble. History of the flag of the United States of America. Boston: A. Williams and Co., 1880.
  • (p. xv) Records of the Adjutant General's Office. Record Group 94, National Archives, Washington, D.C.
  • Regulations for the government of the Ordnance Department. Washington: Francis P. Blair, 1834.
  • Regulations for the uniform and dress of the Army of the United States, June 1851. Philadelphia: William H. Horstmann and Sons, 1851.
  • William H. Riker Soldiers of the States. Washington: Public Affairs Press, 1957.
  • Standing Order Book, 1st Infantry, Detroit. MSS Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D. C.
  • Neil H. Swanson The perilous flight. New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1945.
  • Todd, Fred P. The Huddy and Duval prints. Journal of the American Military Institute (1939), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 166-176.
  • ——. Notes on the dress of the Regiment of Light Artillery, U.S.A. Military Collector and Historian (March 1950), vol. 2, no. 1, p. 10.
  • ——. Our National Guard: An introduction to its history. Military Affairs, vol. 5, no. 2 (summer 1941), pp. 73-86; vol. 5, no. 3 (fall 1941), pp. 152-170.
  • ——. The curious case of the Voltigeur uniform. Military Collector and Historian (June 1952), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 44-45.
  • ——. Notes on the organization and uniforms of South Carolina military forces, 1860-1861. Military Collector and Historian (September 1951), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 53-62.
  • ——. Three leather cockades. Military Collector and Historian (spring 1956), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 24-25.
  • Townsend, F.C., and Todd, Fred P. Branch insignia of the Regular cavalry, 1833-1872. Military Collector and Historian (spring 1956), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-5.
  • Upton, Emory. The military policy of the United States. Senate Document No. 379, 64th Congress, 1st Session. Washington: 1916.
  • U.S. Military Magazine (1839-1842), vols. 1-3.
  • Wall, Alexander J. The flag with an eagle in the canton. New York Historical Society Quarterly Bulletin (October 1933), vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 51-67.
  • John W. Wike Untitled MS, Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C.
  • Writings of George Washington. Edit. John G. Fitzpatrick. Washington: 1944.
  • Zieber, Eugene. Heraldry in America. Philadelphia: Bailey, Banks, and Biddle, 1909.

American
Military Insignia
1800-1851

(p. 3) Introduction

In almost all armies it long has been standard practice to use distinctive devices of cloth and metal to distinguish between arms and services, and between individual units of each arm, to enhance morale and develop esprit de corps. Colors of units of the British Army have had ancient badges emblazoned on them since before the establishment of the present standing army in 1661. By the end of the first half of the 18th century some of these badges had been authorized for placement on horse furniture or for wear on grenadier caps. This was especially true of the regiments of horse and a few of the older regiments of foot. The infantry regiments received numerical designations in 1751, and these numbers were worn on waist belts, shoulder belts, and cartridge-box plates. When the infantry units acquired county titles in 1782, these names often were added to the plates. In 1767 regimental numbers were ordered placed on the buttons of officers and other ranks; in practice these numbers were often combined with other devices.[1]

In almost all armies, it has long been standard practice to use distinctive cloth and metal insignia to differentiate between branches and units, boosting morale and fostering a sense of unity. Since before the current standing army was established in 1661, the British Army’s units have had traditional badges displayed on them. By the end of the first half of the 18th century, some of these badges were authorized for use on horse gear or worn on grenadier caps. This was especially common for cavalry regiments and a few of the older infantry regiments. Infantry regiments received numerical designations in 1751, and these numbers were displayed on waist belts, shoulder straps, and cartridge box plates. When the infantry units adopted county titles in 1782, these names were often added to the plates. In 1767, regimental numbers were required to be placed on the buttons of officers and soldiers; in practice, these numbers were often combined with other insignia.[1]

In the American Army such devices have taken many forms, ranging from distinctive buttons, plumes, cockades, cap plates, shoulder-belt plates, and waist-belt and cartridge-box plates to the well-known shoulder sleeve insignia and distinctive unit insignia of the present day. The origin of much of this insignia and many of the changes in its design can be tied more or less directly to the organization of the Regular Army—its contractions and expansions and its changes in arm and service designations—and to the peculiar circumstances surrounding the origin and growth of the volunteer or uniformed Militia. Thus, a short discussion of the organization of each is in order.[2]

In the American Army, these insignias have appeared in various forms, including unique buttons, plumes, cockades, cap plates, shoulder-belt plates, and waist-belt and cartridge-box plates, as well as the well-known shoulder sleeve insignia and distinctive unit insignia we see today. The roots of much of this insignia and many of the changes in its design can be linked directly to the structure of the Regular Army—its contractions and expansions and its changes in arm and service designations—and to the unique circumstances that shaped the origin and growth of the volunteer or uniformed Militia. Therefore, a brief discussion of the organization of each is necessary.[2]

Organization of the Regular Army

Two months after the War of the Revolution officially ended with the signing of a peace treaty on September 3, 1783, General Washington directed the Army to turn in its arms and disband.[3] Since the Continental Congress had made no provision for a permanent establishment, Washington retained in service one infantry regiment and a battalion of artillery to guard military stores and take over posts to be evacuated by the British.[4] Early in June 1784 Congress ordered these units disbanded except for (p. 4) detachments to guard stores at Fort Pitt and West Point; then, in order to secure the frontier against Indian unrest, it immediately authorized a regiment to be raised from the militia of four of the States to comprise eight companies of infantry and two of artillery.[5] This unit, called the First American Regiment, gradually turned into a regular organization.

Two months after the Revolutionary War officially ended with the signing of a peace treaty on September 3, 1783, General Washington ordered the Army to give up their weapons and disband.[3] Since the Continental Congress hadn't made plans for a permanent military force, Washington kept one infantry regiment and a battalion of artillery in service to protect military supplies and take over posts that the British were leaving behind.[4] In early June 1784, Congress decided to disband these units, except for (p. 4) some detachments to guard supplies at Fort Pitt and West Point. Then, to secure the frontier against issues with Native Americans, Congress quickly authorized the formation of a regiment from the militias of four states, consisting of eight infantry companies and two artillery companies.[5] This unit, known as the First American Regiment, gradually became a regular military organization.

The failure of an expedition commanded by Col. Josiah Harmar of the First American Regiment against the Indians in 1790 awakened the Congress somewhat to the threat in the Northwest and resulted in the organization of another infantry regiment, which was designated the 2d Infantry Regiment; the First American Regiment was redesignated the "1st".[6] Trouble with the Indians continued, and after another severe reverse Congress authorized the raising of three additional infantry regiments and, at the same time, empowered the President to organize the Army as he might see fit.[7]

The failure of an expedition led by Col. Josiah Harmar of the First American Regiment against the Indians in 1790 made Congress more aware of the threat in the Northwest, leading to the formation of another infantry regiment, which was named the 2nd Infantry Regiment; the First American Regiment was renamed the "1st".[6] Tensions with the Indians continued, and after another serious setback, Congress approved the creation of three more infantry regiments and at the same time gave the President the authority to organize the Army as he saw fit.[7]

Under this discretionary power, the Army was reorganized into the Legion of the United States. This was a field army in which the three combat branches—infantry, cavalry, and artillery—were combined. The Legion was in turn broken down into four sublegions, with each containing infantry, cavalry, artillery, and riflemen; thus, the sublegions were the fore-runners of the modern combined arms team. The 1st and 2d Infantries became the 1st and 2d Sublegions. Of the three additional infantry regiments authorized, only two were organized, these becoming the 3d and 4th Sublegions.[8] Under the forceful leadership of Gen. Anthony Wayne the Legion reversed the record on the frontier and decisively defeated the Indians at the Battle of Fallen Timbers. The temporary peace which followed turned attention to the problem of protecting the Atlantic seaboard, and in 1794 Congress authorized a large increase in the artillery, assigned engineer officers, and designated the new organization the Corps of Artillerists and Engineers.[9] The Legion was continued until it was replaced in 1796 by the 1st, 2d, 3d, and 4th Infantry Regiments, which were constituted from the four sublegions, two troops of light dragoons, and the above-mentioned Corps.[10]

Under this discretionary power, the Army was reorganized into the Legion of the United States. This was a field army where the three combat branches—infantry, cavalry, and artillery—were combined. The Legion was then divided into four sublegions, each containing infantry, cavalry, artillery, and riflemen; thus, the sublegions were the predecessors of the modern combined arms team. The 1st and 2nd Infantries became the 1st and 2nd Sublegions. Of the three additional infantry regiments authorized, only two were formed, which became the 3rd and 4th Sublegions.[8] Under the strong leadership of Gen. Anthony Wayne, the Legion changed the course on the frontier and decisively defeated the Indians at the Battle of Fallen Timbers. The temporary peace that followed shifted focus to the challenge of protecting the Atlantic seaboard, and in 1794, Congress authorized a significant increase in the artillery, assigned engineer officers, and named the new organization the Corps of Artillerists and Engineers.[9] The Legion continued until it was replaced in 1796 by the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Infantry Regiments, which were formed from the four sublegions, two troops of light dragoons, and the aforementioned Corps.[10]

The threat of war with France in 1798 brought further expansions. In April of that year an "additional regiment" of artillerists and engineers was authorized, with the Corps created in 1794 becoming the 1st and the new unit being designated the 2d Regiment of Artillerists and Engineers.[11] In the following July, 12 more regiments of infantry and 6 troops of light dragoons—to be combined with the two troops in existence to form a regiment—were authorized; an additional 24 regiments of infantry, plus units of other arms, authorized the following winter made a total of 40 regiments of infantry.[12] Actually, the greatest part of this force remained on paper. Only the 1st and 2d Infantries ever attained their required strength, and only 3,400 men were enlisted for the 5th through the 16th. There were no enlistments at all for the other regiments. Officers were assigned to the six troops of light dragoons, but no enlisted personnel were raised and no horses were bought.[13]

The threat of war with France in 1798 led to further expansions. In April of that year, an "additional regiment" of artillerymen and engineers was approved, with the Corps established in 1794 becoming the 1st, and the new unit designated as the 2nd Regiment of Artillerists and Engineers.[11] In the following July, 12 more infantry regiments and 6 troops of light dragoons—to be combined with the two existing troops to create a regiment—were authorized. An additional 24 infantry regiments, along with other units, authorized the following winter brought the total to 40 infantry regiments.[12] However, most of this force existed only on paper. Only the 1st and 2nd Infantries reached their required strength, and only 3,400 men were recruited for the 5th through the 16th. There were no recruitments at all for the other regiments. Officers were assigned to the six troops of light dragoons, but no enlisted personnel were gathered, and no horses were purchased.[13]

More quickly than it had arisen, the threat of a war with France abated. Early in 1800 action was suspended under the two acts creating the paper regiments, and the Army was reduced to the regular establishment of four regiments of infantry, two regiments of artillerists and engineers, and two troops of light dragoons.[14] Two years later the antipathy of the new Jefferson administration to a standing army further reduced this establishment to two regiments of infantry and one of artillery. The Corps of Artillerists and Engineers was abolished; a Corps of Engineers was organized to be stationed at West Point and "constitute a military academy"; and the light dragoons were disbanded.[15]

More quickly than it had arisen, the threat of war with France faded. In early 1800, action was paused under the two laws that created the paper regiments, and the Army was cut down to the regular size of four infantry regiments, two regiments of artillery and engineers, and two troops of light dragoons.[14] Two years later, the new Jefferson administration's dislike of a standing army further shrank this force to two infantry regiments and one of artillery. The Corps of Artillerists and Engineers was dissolved; a Corps of Engineers was formed to be stationed at West Point and "constitute a military academy"; and the light dragoons were disbanded.[15]

The Jeffersonian theories regarding a strong militia and a small professional army were rudely shaken in 1807 by the Chesapeake-Leopard affair. With war seeming imminent, Congress added to the Regular Establishment, though cautiously "for a limited time," five regiments of infantry, one regiment of riflemen, one of light artillery, and one of light dragoons. The new regiments of infantry were numbered the 3d through (p. 5) the 7th.[16] There was no further preparation for a fight with England until just before war was actually declared. In January 1812, 10 regiments of infantry, two of artillery, and one regiment of light dragoons were added; three months later a Corps of Artificers was organized; and in June provision was made for eight more infantry regiments, making a total of 25.[17] In January 1813, following the discouragements of the early campaigns in the Northwest, Congress constituted 20 more infantry regiments, bringing the total to 45, the largest number in the Regular Establishment until the 20th century.[18] A year later three more regiments of riflemen, designated the 2d through the 4th, were formed.[19]

The Jeffersonian ideas about having a strong militia and a small professional army were seriously challenged in 1807 by the Chesapeake-Leopard incident. With war looking likely, Congress decided to expand the Regular Establishment, but only "for a limited time," by adding five regiments of infantry, one regiment of riflemen, one of light artillery, and one of light dragoons. The new infantry regiments were numbered from the 3rd to (p. 5) the 7th.[16] There weren't any further preparations for a conflict with England until just before war was officially declared. In January 1812, 10 regiments of infantry, two of artillery, and one regiment of light dragoons were added; three months later, a Corps of Artificers was established; and in June, plans were made for eight more infantry regiments, bringing the total to 25.[17] In January 1813, after the setbacks of the early campaigns in the Northwest, Congress created 20 more infantry regiments, increasing the total to 45, the highest number in the Regular Establishment until the 20th century.[18] A year later, three additional regiments of riflemen, numbered the 2nd through the 4th, were formed.[19]

In March 1814 Congress reorganized both the artillery and the dragoons. The three artillery regiments, which had never operated as such, but rather by company or detachment, were consolidated into the Corps of Artillery; and the two regiments of dragoons, which had never been adequately trained and generally had given a poor account of themselves, were merged into one.[20] The Regiment of Light Artillery remained untouched.

In March 1814, Congress restructured both the artillery and the dragoons. The three artillery regiments, which had previously operated more as companies or detachments, were combined into the Corps of Artillery. The two regiments of dragoons, which had not been properly trained and had generally performed poorly, were merged into one. [20] The Regiment of Light Artillery remained unchanged.

Almost as soon as the war ended, Congress moved to reduce the Army[21] by limiting the peacetime establishment to 10,000 men, to be divided among infantry, artillery, and riflemen, plus the Corps of Engineers. The number of wartime infantry units was reduced to eight, and the rifle units to one. The Corps of Artillery and the Regiment of Light Artillery were retained, but dragoons were eliminated.[22]

Almost right after the war ended, Congress took action to cut down the Army[21] by limiting the peacetime size to 10,000 soldiers, divided among infantry, artillery, and riflemen, in addition to the Corps of Engineers. The number of wartime infantry units was lowered to eight, and the rifle units to one. The Corps of Artillery and the Regiment of Light Artillery were kept, but dragoons were removed.[22]

By 1821 the prospects of a prolonged peace appeared so good that Congress felt safe in further reducing the Army. Consequently, in that year the number of infantry regiments was cut to seven; the Rifle Regiment was disbanded; the Corps of Artillery and the Regiment of Light Artillery were disbanded, with four artillery regiments being organized in their stead; and the Ordnance Department was merged with the artillery,[23] an arrangement that continued until 1832.

By 1821, the chances of lasting peace looked so promising that Congress felt comfortable further downsizing the Army. As a result, that year the number of infantry regiments was reduced to seven; the Rifle Regiment was disbanded; the Corps of Artillery and the Regiment of Light Artillery were dissolved, and four new artillery regiments were formed in their place; the Ordnance Department was combined with the artillery,[23] an arrangement that lasted until 1832.

The opening of the West in the decades following the War of 1812 brought an important change in the organization of the Army. Experience having shown that infantry were at a distinct disadvantage when pitted against the fleetly mounted Indians, in 1832 a battalion of mounted rangers was organized to quell disturbances on the northwest frontier,[24] but this loosely knit force was replaced by a regiment of dragoons the following year.[25] The mounted arm had come to stay in the Army.

The opening of the West in the years after the War of 1812 led to a significant shift in how the Army was organized. Experience had shown that infantry were at a clear disadvantage against the fast-moving Indians, so in 1832, a battalion of mounted rangers was created to address disturbances on the northwest frontier,[24] but this loosely organized group was replaced by a regiment of dragoons the following year.[25] The mounted branch had become a permanent part of the Army.

When the second Seminole War broke out in 1836, a second regiment of dragoons was organized.[26] And, as the war dragged through another inconclusive year, a reluctant Congress was forced to increase the size of existing line units and to authorize an additional regiment of infantry, the 8th. Meanwhile, increasing demands for surveying and mapping services resulted in the creation of the Corps of Topographical Engineers as a separate entity.[27]

When the second Seminole War started in 1836, a second regiment of dragoons was formed.[26] As the war continued for another unproductive year, a reluctant Congress had to increase the size of existing line units and authorize an additional regiment of infantry, the 8th. At the same time, growing demands for surveying and mapping services led to the creation of the Corps of Topographical Engineers as a separate unit.[27]

Meanwhile, the responsibilities of the Army in the opening of the West continued to increase, and in 1846 the Regiment of Mounted Riflemen was organized to consolidate the northern route to the Pacific by establishing and manning a series of posts along the Oregon Trail.[28] However, the outbreak of the War with Mexico postponed this mission.

Meanwhile, the Army's duties in the expansion of the West kept growing, and in 1846, the Regiment of Mounted Riflemen was formed to strengthen the northern route to the Pacific by setting up and staffing a series of posts along the Oregon Trail.[28] However, the start of the War with Mexico delayed this mission.

At the start of the War with Mexico Congress leaned heavily on volunteer units, with the hard (p. 6) core of the Regulars remaining unchanged. But early in 1847 it was found necessary to add nine regiments of infantry and one regiment of dragoons.[29] Of the infantry unit's, eight were of the conventional type; the ninth was formed as the Regiment of Voltigeurs and Foot Riflemen. Theoretically, only half of this latter regiment was to be mounted. Each horseman was to be paired with a foot soldier who was to get up behind and ride double when speed was needed. In practice, however, none of the Voltigeurs were mounted; the entire unit fought as foot riflemen.[30]

At the start of the War with Mexico, Congress relied heavily on volunteer units, while the core of the Regulars stayed the same. But by early 1847, it became necessary to add nine regiments of infantry and one regiment of dragoons.[29] Of the infantry units, eight were the standard type, while the ninth was created as the Regiment of Voltigeurs and Foot Riflemen. Theoretically, only half of this regiment was supposed to be mounted. Each horseman was meant to be paired with a foot soldier who could hop on and ride double when speed was needed. In reality, though, none of the Voltigeurs were mounted; the entire unit fought as foot riflemen.[30]

All of these new units proved merely creatures of the war, and the coming of peace saw a reduction to the old establishment of eight regiments of infantry, four of artillery, two of dragoons, and one regiment of mounted riflemen.[31] This organization remained substantially unchanged until 1855.[32]

All of these new units turned out to be just products of the war, and with peace, the military was scaled back to the old structure of eight infantry regiments, four artillery regiments, two dragoon regiments, and one regiment of mounted riflemen.[31] This setup stayed mostly the same until 1855.[32]

Organization of the Militia

The "common" Militia was first established by the various colonies of all able-bodied men between roughly the ages of 16 and 60 for protection against Indian attack. These militiamen were required by law to be enrolled in the unit of their township or county, furnish their own arms and equipment, and appear periodically for training. They were civilian soldiers who had little or no taste for things military, as their performance in both peace and war almost invariably demonstrated. They were not uniformed and contributed little or nothing to the field of military dress.

The "common" militia was first created by the different colonies consisting of all able-bodied men between about 16 and 60 years old for protection against Indian attacks. By law, these militiamen had to be enrolled in the unit of their township or county, provide their own weapons and gear, and show up regularly for training. They were civilian soldiers who generally had little interest in military matters, as their effectiveness in both peacetime and wartime consistently showed. They were not required to wear uniforms and made minimal contributions to military clothing.

The "volunteer" or "independent" Militia companies, on the other hand, were something else again. These units, composed of men who enjoyed military life, or rather certain aspects of it, appeared rather early in the Nation's history. The first of these, formed in 1638, was The Military Company of the Massachusetts, later and better known as the Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company of Massachusetts. By 1750 there were a number of independent companies in existence—many of them chartered—and membership in them had become a recognized part of the social life of the larger urban centers.

The "volunteer" or "independent" militia companies were quite different. These units were made up of men who enjoyed military life, or at least certain aspects of it, and they formed relatively early in the nation's history. The first of these was established in 1638, known as The Military Company of Massachusetts, which is more commonly referred to as the Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company of Massachusetts. By 1750, there were several independent companies already established—many of them chartered—and being a member of them had become a recognized part of social life in the larger urban centers.

The concept of volunteer Militia units was confirmed in the Uniform Militia Act of 1792, which prescribed flank companies of grenadiers, light infantry, or riflemen for the "common" Militia battalions and a company of artillery and a troop of horse for each division, to be formed of volunteers from the Militia at large and to be uniformed and equipped at the individual volunteer's expense. Thus, from within the national Militia structure emerged an elite corps of amateur—as opposed to civilian—soldiers who enjoyed military exercise, and the pomp and circumstance accompanying it, and who were willing to sacrifice both the time and the money necessary to enjoy it. Since the members were volunteers, they were ready to submit to discipline up to a point; they trained rather frequently; many of the officers made an effort to educate themselves militarily; they chose their own officers; and their relative permanency gave rise to an excellent esprit de corps. In actuality, these organizations became private military clubs, and differed from other male social and fraternal groups only in externals.

The idea of volunteer militia units was established in the Uniform Militia Act of 1792, which required flank companies of grenadiers, light infantry, or riflemen for the "common" militia battalions, as well as a company of artillery and a troop of cavalry for each division. These were to be made up of volunteers from the overall militia and were to be uniformed and equipped at the individual volunteer's expense. Thus, within the national militia structure, an elite group of amateur—rather than civilian—soldiers emerged, who enjoyed military drills and the associated pomp and circumstance, and who were willing to invest both their time and money to participate. Since the members were volunteers, they were willing to accept discipline to some extent; they trained often; many officers sought to educate themselves about military matters; they selected their own officers; and their relative stability fostered a strong sense of camaraderie. In reality, these organizations turned into private military clubs, differing from other male social and fraternal groups only in appearance.

The great urban growth of the Nation during the period 1825-1860 was the golden age of the volunteer companies, and by 1845 these units had all but supplanted the common Militia. It would be difficult to even estimate the number of volunteer companies during this period. They sprang up almost everywhere, more in answer to a demand by the younger men of the Nation for a recreation that would meet a social and physical need and by emigrant minorities for a group expression than for reasons military. It was a "gay and gaudy" Militia, with each unit in its own distinctive and generally resplendent uniform. If the "Raleigh Cossacks," the "Hibernia Greens," the "Velvet Light Infantry Company," or the "Teutonic Rifles" were more "invincible in peace" than visible in war, they were a spectacular, colorful, and exciting integral of the social and military life of the first half of the 19th century.

The significant urban growth of the nation between 1825 and 1860 marked the golden age of volunteer companies, and by 1845, these groups had nearly replaced the common militia. It would be tough to even estimate how many volunteer companies existed during this time. They emerged almost everywhere, mainly driven by younger men seeking a form of recreation that satisfied both social and physical needs, as well as by immigrant minorities looking for a sense of community, rather than for military reasons. It was a vibrant and flashy militia, with each unit boasting its own unique and often striking uniforms. Whether it was the "Raleigh Cossacks," the "Hibernia Greens," the "Velvet Light Infantry Company," or the "Teutonic Rifles," they were more "invincible in peace" than seen in war, yet they were a spectacular, colorful, and exciting part of the social and military life of the early 19th century.

(p. 7) Insignia of the Regular Army

Uniform regulations prior to 1821 were loosely and vaguely worded, and this was especially true in regard to officers' insignia. For example General Orders of March 30, 1800, stated: "... the swords of all officers, except the generals, to be attached by a white shoulder belt three inches wide, with an oval plate three inches by two and a half ornamented with an eagle."[33] In 1801 the 1st Infantry Regiment directed that "the sword ... for platoon officers ... be worn with a white belt over the coat with a breast plate such as have been by the Colonel established,"[34] and in 1810 a regulation stated that "those gentlemen who have white sword belts and plates [are] to consider them as uniform, but those not so provided will be permitted to wear their waist belts."[35] As a result, the officers generally wore what they wished, and there was a wide variation in design. Most officer insignia were the product of local jewelers and silversmiths, although some known specimens are obviously the work of master craftsmen. Quality varied as well as design, depending on the affluence of the officer concerned. Some of the plainer plates appear to have been made by rolling silver dollars into an oval shape.

Uniform regulations before 1821 were loosely and vaguely phrased, especially regarding officers' insignia. For instance, the General Orders from March 30, 1800, stated: "... the swords of all officers, except the generals, are to be attached by a white shoulder belt three inches wide, with an oval plate three inches by two and a half, decorated with an eagle."[33] In 1801, the 1st Infantry Regiment instructed that "the sword ... for platoon officers ... be worn with a white belt over the coat with a breast plate as established by the Colonel,"[34] and in 1810, a regulation noted that "those gentlemen who have white sword belts and plates [are] to consider them as uniform, but those who do not will be allowed to wear their waist belts."[35] As a result, officers generally wore what they liked, leading to a wide variety in design. Most officer insignia were made by local jewelers and silversmiths, although some known pieces are clearly crafted by master artisans. Quality and design varied depending on the wealth of the officer. Some of the simpler plates seem to have been created by rolling silver dollars into an oval shape.

In regard to enlisted men's insignia, only the descriptions of the 1800 dragoon helmet plate and the 1814 and 1817 riflemen's cap plates give us anything approaching a clear picture. "Oblong silver plates ... bearing the name of the corps and the number of the regiment" for the infantry in 1812, "plates in front" for the 1812 dragoons, and "gilt plate in front" for the 1812 light artillery are typical examples. As a result, the establishment of a proper chronology for these devices has depended on the careful consideration of specimens excavated at posts where specific units are known to have served at specific times, combined with research in pertinent records of the period in the National Archives.

In terms of enlisted men's insignia, only the descriptions of the 1800 dragoon helmet plate and the 1814 and 1817 riflemen's cap plates give us anything close to a clear picture. "Oblong silver plates ... showing the name of the corps and the number of the regiment" for the infantry in 1812, "plates in front" for the 1812 dragoons, and "gilt plate in front" for the 1812 light artillery are typical examples. Because of this, establishing a proper timeline for these devices has depended on carefully examining specimens found at posts where specific units are known to have served at specific times, along with research in relevant records from that era at the National Archives.

Cap and Helmet Devices

DRAGOON HELMET PLATE, 1800

USNM 66330-M (S-K 86). Figure 1.

USNM 66330-M (S-K 86). Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

The first known distinctive metal branch insignia authorized for the Army was this helmet plate. General Order, U.S. Army, dated March 30, 1800, prescribed for "Cavalry ... a helmet of leather crowned with black horse hair and having a brass front, with a mounted dragoon in the act of charging."[36] This oval plate, struck in thin brass with lead-filled back, has a raised rim, within which is a mounted, helmeted horseman in the act of charging; overhead is an eagle with a wreath in its beak. A double-wire fastener soldered to the back is not contemporary.

The first known unique metal branch insignia approved for the Army was this helmet plate. General Order, U.S. Army, dated March 30, 1800, specified for "Cavalry ... a leather helmet topped with black horsehair and featuring a brass front, depicting a mounted dragoon in the act of charging."[36] This oval plate, made of thin brass with a lead-filled back, has a raised rim, within which is a helmeted horseman in the act of charging; above is an eagle holding a wreath in its beak. A double-wire fastener soldered to the back is not original.

(p. 8) DRAGOON HELMET PLATE, 1800, DIE SAMPLE

USNM 60283-M (S-K 41). Figure 2.

USNM 60283-M (S-K 41). Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Although from a different die, this plate, struck in thin brass, appears to be a die sample of the plate described above. It is also possible that it is a sample of the dragoon plate authorized in 1812.

Although from a different mold, this plate, made of thin brass, seems to be a sample of the plate described above. It's also possible that it is a sample of the dragoon plate approved in 1812.

¶ The 1813 uniform regulations specified for enlisted men of the artillery a "black leather cockade, with points 4 inches in diameter, a yellow button and eagle in the center, the button in uniform with the coat button."[37] This specification gives some validity to the belief that a cockade with an approximation of the artillery button tooled on it may also have been worn.

¶ The 1813 uniform regulations required enlisted men of the artillery to have a "black leather cockade, measuring 4 inches in diameter, with a yellow button and eagle in the center, the button matching the coat button."[37] This specification supports the idea that a cockade resembling the artillery button may have also been worn.

LEATHER COCKADE, ARTILLERY, C. 1808-1812

USNM 60256-M (S-K 14). Figure 3.

USNM 60256-M (S-K 14). Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

This cockade is of black leather of the size prescribed by the 1813 regulations. Tooled into the upper fan is an eagle-on-cannon device with a stack of 6 cannon balls under the trail; an arc of 15 stars partially surrounds the eagle device. It is believed to have been worn on artillery chapeaux de bras as early as 1808.

This cockade is made of black leather in the size required by the 1813 regulations. Tooling on the upper fan features an eagle-on-cannon design with a stack of 6 cannonballs underneath the trail; an arc of 15 stars partially surrounds the eagle design. It's thought to have been worn on artillery chapeaux de bras as early as 1808.

The specimen is unmarked as to maker, but from correspondence of Callendar Irvine, Commissary General of Purchases from 1812 to 1841, it seems very possible that cockades similar to this one were made by Robert Dingee of New York City. Dingee is first listed in New York directories as a "saddler" (1812); he is listed later as "city weigher" (1828) and "inspector of green hides" (1831). The eagle-on-cannon design is similar to that of several Regular artillery buttons worn between 1802 and 1821, but it most closely approximates a button Johnson assigns to the period 1794-1810.[38]

The item doesn't have any maker's marks, but based on letters from Callendar Irvine, who was the Commissary General of Purchases from 1812 to 1841, it's quite likely that cockades like this one were made by Robert Dingee in New York City. Dingee first appears in New York directories as a "saddler" in 1812; later, he’s listed as "city weigher" in 1828 and "inspector of green hides" in 1831. The eagle-on-cannon design is similar to several Regular artillery buttons worn between 1802 and 1821, but it closely resembles a button that Johnson attributes to the period from 1794 to 1810.[38]

¶ The question has been raised as to whether the Regulars ever wore a cockade with such a device. The 1813 and 1814 uniform regulations merely (p. 9) specified black leather cockades of 4 inches and 4-1/2 inches in diameter respectively. However, since the Militia generally did not start adopting Regular Army devices until the 1820's it seems probable that this cockade was an item of Regular Army issue, despite the lack of evidence of specific authorization.

¶ The question has come up about whether the Regulars ever wore a cockade with that design. The uniform regulations from 1813 and 1814 only specified black leather cockades that were 4 inches and 4-1/2 inches in diameter, respectively. However, since the Militia typically didn't start using Regular Army designs until the 1820s, it seems likely that this cockade was an item issued by the Regular Army, even though there's no specific evidence of authorization.

As early as January 1799 War Office orders specified: "All persons belonging to the Army, to wear a black cockade, with a small white eagle in the center. The cockade of noncommissioned officers, musicians, and privates to be of leather with Eagles of tin."[39] This regulation was repeated in 1800.[40] By 1802 these cockade eagles had taken the colors used for the buttons and lace of the different arms. The Purveyor of Public Supplies in that year purchased cockade eagles in tin (white) for infantry and in brass (yellow) for artillery enlisted men at a cost of one and two cents, respectively.[41] The cockade eagles of infantry officers were to be of silver and those of artillery officers of gold. Cockades for company officers and enlisted personnel were to be of leather. The loosely worded regulation of 1813 infers that field officers' cockades might be of silk similar to the "black Ribbon" binding specified for their hats.[42]

As early as January 1799, War Office orders stated: "All members of the Army are to wear a black cockade with a small white eagle in the center. The cockade for noncommissioned officers, musicians, and privates is to be made of leather with tin eagles."[39] This rule was repeated in 1800.[40] By 1802, these cockade eagles had adopted the colors used for the buttons and lace of the different branches. The Purveyor of Public Supplies bought cockade eagles in tin (white) for infantry and brass (yellow) for artillery enlisted men that year, for a cost of one and two cents, respectively.[41] The cockade eagles for infantry officers were to be silver, while those for artillery officers were to be gold. Cockades for company officers and enlisted personnel were to be made of leather. The loosely worded regulation from 1813 suggests that field officers' cockades could be made of silk, similar to the "black ribbon" binding specified for their hats.[42]

It is extremely difficult to determine whether cockade eagles are of Regular Army or Militia origin, and to date them if the latter. They have been found in a wide variety of design and size, ranging from the rather plain example (fig. 6) to the highly refined one on the general officer's chapeau de bras (fig. 4). Examination of hats worn by both Regulars and Militia prior to 1821 reveals that there is little to choose between the eagles worn by the two components. After 1821, however, when Militia insignia tended to become more ornate and Regular devices more uniform, some of the Militia specimens emerge as distinct types because they have no Regular counterparts. Origin of the specimen, including excavations of military cantonment sites where the make-up of the garrison can be determined, has been the primary criterion used in assignment to either Regular Army or Militia, and to a lesser extent in dating. Over-all design and method of manufacture have also been considered in dating.

It’s really hard to figure out whether cockade eagles come from the Regular Army or Militia, and to date them if they’re from the Militia. They’ve been found in a range of designs and sizes, from a pretty simple example (fig. 6) to the very sophisticated one on the general officer's chapeau de bras (fig. 4). Looking at hats worn by both Regulars and Militia before 1821 shows that there isn’t much difference between the eagles worn by the two groups. After 1821, though, as Militia insignia became more elaborate and Regular devices more standardized, some Militia examples started to stand out because they have no Regular equivalents. The origin of the specimen, including finds at military camp sites where the composition of the garrison can be identified, has been the main criterion used to assign them to either the Regular Army or Militia, and to a lesser degree in dating them. Overall design and production methods have also been taken into account when dating them.

COCKADE EAGLE, GENERAL OFFICER, 1800-1812

USNM 12813. Figure 4.

USNM 12813. Fig. 4.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Unusually refined in design, the eagle is of gold, with head to right, federal shield on breast, and olive branch in right talon. Three arrows, with points outward, are held in left talon.

Unusually refined in design, the eagle is made of gold, facing right, with a federal shield on its chest and an olive branch in its right talon. Three arrows, pointing outward, are held in its left talon.

This cockade eagle is on a chapeau de bras formerly belonging to Peter Gansevoort, brigadier general of the New York State Militia and brigadier general, U.S. Army, 1809-1812. Although Gansevoort wore this chapeau while serving as a Militia officer, as evidenced by a New York State button attached to it, this eagle is included with Regular Army devices because it is typical of those probably worn by high-ranking officers of both components.

This cockade eagle is on a chapeau de bras that used to belong to Peter Gansevoort, brigadier general of the New York State Militia and brigadier general in the U.S. Army from 1809 to 1812. Although Gansevoort wore this chapeau while serving as a Militia officer, as shown by a New York State button attached to it, this eagle is included with Regular Army insignia because it's typical of those likely worn by high-ranking officers from both groups.

(p. 10) COCKADE EAGLE, C. 1800-1821

USNM 60362-M (S-K 118). Figure 5.

USNM 60362-M (S-K 118). Figure 5.

Figure 5

Figure 5

Cast in pewter and gold-finished, this eagle looks to the right, stands on clouds, and holds three arrows (facing inward) in the right talon and an upright olive branch in the left.

Cast in pewter and gold-finished, this eagle looks to the right, stands on clouds, and holds three arrows (pointing inward) in its right talon and an upright olive branch in its left.

The eagle-on-clouds design is first seen on coins on the 1795 silver dollar.[43] It was popular during the War of 1812 period, and was not used in new designs by the Regular Army after 1821. Eagles of identical design and size are also known in pewter without finish. Such an eagle could have been worn by Militia as well as Regulars. Similar specimens have been excavated at Regular Army cantonment sites of the period.

The eagle-on-clouds design first appeared on coins in the 1795 silver dollar.[43] It was popular during the War of 1812, but the Regular Army stopped using it in new designs after 1821. Eagles of the same design and size are also found in unpainted pewter. Such an eagle could have been worn by both the Militia and Regulars. Similar specimens have been discovered at Regular Army cantonment sites from that time.

COCKADE EAGLE, OFFICERS, 1800-1821

USNM 66352-M. Figure 6.

USNM 66352-M. Fig. 6.

Figure 6

Figure 6

This cockade eagle, which is struck in thin brass and silvered, was excavated on the site of a War of 1812 cantonment. Comparison with similar specimens in other collections indicates that the missing head was turned to the right. This eagle is classed as an officer's device because of its silvered brass composition. The elements comprising the arc on which the eagle stands cannot be identified because of the lightness of the strike.

This cockade eagle, made of thin brass and silvered, was dug up at the site of a War of 1812 camp. Comparing it with similar items in other collections suggests that the missing head faced to the right. This eagle is categorized as an officer's device due to its silvered brass material. The components that make up the arc beneath the eagle can't be identified because of the lightness of the strike.

¶ When the dragoons were disbanded in the 1802 reduction following the dissipation of the French scare, distinctive hat devices other than cockades (p. 11) disappeared from the service. In 1808, when the Army was increased, the newly constituted regiments of light dragoons, light artillery, and riflemen were authorized to wear leather caps. The cap devices for these units were prescribed as Roman letters, "U.S.L.D.," "U.S.L.A.," and "U.S.R.R.," rather than plates. The letters were to be of brass, 1-1/2 inches "in length."[44]

¶ When the dragoons were disbanded in the 1802 reduction after the French scare faded, unique hat insignias other than cockades (p. 11) were removed from service. In 1808, when the Army was expanded, the newly formed regiments of light dragoons, light artillery, and riflemen were allowed to wear leather caps. The cap insignias for these units were specified as Roman letters, "U.S. Law Division," "U.S.L.A.," and "U.S.S.R.," instead of plates. The letters had to be made of brass, measuring 1-1/2 inches "in length."[44]

Figure 7.—Specimens in Campbell collection.

Figure 7.—Specimens in the Campbell collection.

Illustrated in figure 7 are the letters "U" and "L", of brass, slightly more than 1 inch "in length" and a letter d, of pewter, 1 inch "in length." The latter was excavated at Sackets Harbor, New York, where elements of the light artillery dragoons and riflemen are known to have served during 1813 and 1814. It seems obvious that pewter letters were worn by the dragoons as consonant with their other trimmings, for in July 1812 Col. James Burn of the 2d Light Dragoons requested official permission to issue such.[45]

Illustrated in figure 7 are the letters "U" and "L", made of brass and slightly over 1 inch long, along with a letter d, made of pewter, which is 1 inch long. The pewter letter was found at Sackets Harbor, New York, where members of the light artillery dragoons and riflemen are known to have served in 1813 and 1814. It’s clear that pewter letters were worn by the dragoons as part of their uniform decorations, since in July 1812, Col. James Burn of the 2nd Light Dragoons asked for official permission to issue them.[45]

With the large increase in the Army in 1812 came a change in the headgear of some corps and also a change in insignia. The light artillery was to wear a yoeman-crowned (i.e., wider at the crown than at the base) black cap with "gilt plate in front," and the infantry platoon officers and enlisted men were finally to have the black cylindrical caps (first prescribed in 1810) with "an oblong silver plate in front of the cap bearing the name of the corps and number of the regiment."[46] The rifle platoon officers and enlisted men were also to wear infantry caps, but with yellow trimmings.[47] The dragoons were authorized "helmets" with "plates" in 1812, and the foot artillery regiments in the fall of the same year were ordered to wear caps like the light artillery instead of the chapeaux de bras previously worn, which would have necessitated the use of plates.

With the significant increase in the Army in 1812 came a change in the headgear of some units and also a change in insignia. The light artillery was set to wear a black cap with a yoeman crown (wider at the top than at the base) featuring a "gilt plate in front," while the infantry platoon officers and enlisted men would finally have the black cylindrical caps (first introduced in 1810) with "an oblong silver plate in front of the cap displaying the name of the corps and the regiment number."[46] The rifle platoon officers and enlisted men were also to wear infantry caps but with yellow trimmings.[47] The dragoons were authorized "helmets" with "plates" in 1812, and in the fall of the same year, the foot artillery regiments were instructed to wear caps like the light artillery instead of the chapeaux de bras they had previously worn, which would have required the use of plates.

The foot units received their new insignia almost immediately, the cap plates having been designed, contracted for, and delivered by late February 1812 for the 5th, 6th, 12th, and 15th Infantry Regiments[48] (p. 12) (the latter two were new units). This rapid action in regard to the infantry plates appears to be strong witness to the emphasis placed on distinctive insignia as morale factors and aids to enlistment, for active recruiting for the 10 new regiments did not begin until several months later. There were three different patterns of this infantry plate manufactured and issued, two of which are described below.

The foot units got their new insignia almost right away, with the cap plates being designed, contracted, and delivered by late February 1812 for the 5th, 6th, 12th, and 15th Infantry Regiments[48] (p. 12) (the last two were newly formed units). This quick action regarding the infantry plates shows just how much emphasis was placed on distinctive insignia as factors for boosting morale and helping with enlistment, since active recruiting for the 10 new regiments didn’t start until several months later. Three different patterns of this infantry plate were manufactured and issued, with two of them described below.

All arms were wearing cap plates by the middle of 1813, for there is record of such issue to the dragoons as well as record of rejection of ill-struck specimens for infantry, artillery, and rifles.[49] These plates were made variously by William Crumpton and George Armitage of Philadelphia, and Aaron M. Peasley of Boston.[50] Philadelphia directories list Crumpton as a button maker and silversmith between 1811 and 1822. Armitage is first listed in Philadelphia directories, in 1800, as a "silver plate worker"; in 1801 he is listed as "silverplater," and in 1820 as a "silverplater and military ornament maker." Peasley was an ornament and insignia maker in Boston during the same period.[51]

All branches had cap plates by the middle of 1813, as there are records of such items being issued to the dragoons and also records of poorly made ones being rejected for the infantry, artillery, and rifles.[49] These plates were produced by William Crumpton and George Armitage from Philadelphia, as well as Aaron M. Peasley from Boston.[50] Philadelphia directories list Crumpton as a button maker and silversmith between 1811 and 1822. Armitage is first mentioned in Philadelphia directories in 1800 as a "silver plate worker"; by 1801, he is listed as a "silverplater," and in 1820 as a "silverplater and military ornament maker." Peasley was an ornament and insignia maker in Boston during the same time.[51]

¶ The three types of infantry cap plates issued between 1812 and 1814 are somewhat similar, and all carry the prescribed "name of the corps and number of the regiment." All three specimens of these types are ground finds, two having been excavated after this work was in draft. The first pictured specimen (fig. 8, left) is believed to be the earliest pattern issued. Infantry plates as specified in the regulations were contracted for with William Crumpton late in 1811 or early 1812 by Tench Coxe, Purveyor of Public Supplies, and issued to troop units not later than the early summer.[52] They had been in use but a few months when their generally poor quality of composition forced several regimental commanders to complain to the new Commissary General of Purchases, Callendar Irvine, who had just superseded Coxe, and to request something better. Irvine approved, and he let a contract for new plates with George Armitage of Philadelphia.[53] Irvine's reaction to the matter of the plates is an example of his opinion of his predecessor, Coxe, and Coxe's work in general, which he had observed while serving as Superintendent of Military Stores in Philadelphia. In replying to the complaint of Colonel Simonds, commanding officer of the 6th Infantry, Irvine wrote: "The plates are mere tin, in some respects like the man who designed and contracted for them, differing to him only as to durability ... I am contracting for a plate of decent composition to issue with your next year's clothing."[54]

¶ The three types of infantry cap plates issued between 1812 and 1814 are quite similar, and all feature the required "name of the corps and number of the regiment." All three examples of these types are ground finds, with two being excavated after this work was drafted. The first shown example (fig. 8, left) is believed to be the earliest pattern issued. Infantry plates, as specified in the regulations, were contracted with William Crumpton late in 1811 or early 1812 by Tench Coxe, Purveyor of Public Supplies, and issued to troop units no later than the early summer.[52] They had been in use for only a few months when their generally poor quality led several regimental commanders to complain to the new Commissary General of Purchases, Callendar Irvine, who had just taken over from Coxe, and to request something better. Irvine approved the request and awarded a contract for new plates to George Armitage of Philadelphia.[53] Irvine's response to the issue of the plates reflects his opinion of his predecessor, Coxe, and his work in general, which he had observed while serving as Superintendent of Military Stores in Philadelphia. In responding to Colonel Simonds, the commanding officer of the 6th Infantry, Irvine wrote: "The plates are just tin, much like the man who designed and contracted for them, differing only in durability ... I am contracting for a plate of decent quality to issue with your clothing for next year."[54]

The first pattern carries the "name of the corps and the number of the regiment," the 15th Infantry, commanded by Col. Zebulon Pike who was one of the officers who complained to Irvine about the poor quality of cap plates. The specimen is of tinned iron and the letters and numerals have been struck with individual hand dies.

The first pattern displays the "name of the corps and the regiment number," the 15th Infantry, led by Col. Zebulon Pike, who was one of the officers that voiced concerns to Irvine about the low quality of cap plates. The sample is made of tinned iron, and the letters and numbers were created using individual hand dies.

The two Armitage plates, very similar in over-all design (figures 8, right, and 9), have been designated the second and third patterns. At least one of these—perhaps both—apparently was designed by, and its die sunk by, Moritz Furst, well-known die sinker and designer of Philadelphia. On March 6, 1813, Irvine wrote the Secretary of War: "Mr. Furst executed a die for this office for striking infantry cap plates, designed by him, which has been admitted by judges to be equal, if not superior, to anything of the kind ever produced in this country."[55] Furst was Hungarian by birth. He studied design and die sinking at the mint in Vienna and came to the United States in 1807 with the expectation of becoming Chief Engraver at the Philadelphia Mint, an appointment which he did not receive. He sank the dies for many of the medals voted to War of 1812 leaders, did the obverse die work for a number of Indian peace medals, and is believed to have designed the swords given by the State of New York to Generals Brown, Scott, Gaines, and Macomb.[56]

The two Armitage plates, which are very similar in overall design (figures 8, right, and 9), have been identified as the second and third patterns. At least one of these—possibly both—was designed and its die created by Moritz Furst, a well-known die sinker and designer from Philadelphia. On March 6, 1813, Irvine wrote to the Secretary of War: "Mr. Furst created a die for this office for striking infantry cap plates, designed by him, which has been recognized by judges as being equal, if not better, than anything of its kind ever made in this country."[55] Furst was born in Hungary. He studied design and die sinking at the mint in Vienna and came to the United States in 1807 expecting to become the Chief Engraver at the Philadelphia Mint, a position he did not get. He created the dies for many of the medals awarded to War of 1812 leaders, worked on the obverse die for several Indian peace medals, and is believed to have designed the swords presented by the State of New York to Generals Brown, Scott, Gaines, and Macomb.[56]

(p. 13) CAP PLATE, INFANTRY, 1812

USNM 66456-M. Figure 8, right.

USNM 66456-M. Fig. 8, right.

Figure 8, left.

Figure 8, left.

Figure 8, right.

Figure 8, on the right.

This is the second pattern of the infantry cap plate described in the 1812 regulations as an "oblong silver plate ... bearing the name of the corps and the number of the regiment." The specimen was excavated on the site of Smith's Cantonment at Sackets Harbor, New York, known to have been occupied by Regular infantry during the 1812-1815 period. The piece is struck in "white metal" and tinned [the term "silver" in the regulation referred only to color]. It is rectangular, with clipped corners, and is dominated by an eagle, with wings outspread, grasping lightning bolts in the right talon and an olive branch in the left talon. Below is a panoply of stacked arms, flags with 6-pointed stars, two drums, and a cartridge box marked "U.S." The corps designation "U.S. INFANTRY" is above; the unit designation is blank with the letters "REGT." on the left. The plate is pierced with four pairs of holes on each side for attachment.

This is the second design of the infantry cap plate described in the 1812 regulations as an "oblong silver plate... featuring the name of the corps and the number of the regiment." The example was found at Smith's Cantonment in Sackets Harbor, New York, which is known to have been occupied by Regular infantry during the 1812-1815 period. The piece is made of "white metal" and tin-plated [the term "silver" in the regulation referred only to color]. It has a rectangular shape with clipped corners and is dominated by an eagle, with wings spread, holding lightning bolts in its right talon and an olive branch in its left talon. Below is a collection of stacked arms, flags with 6-pointed stars, two drums, and a cartridge box marked "United States" The corps designation "U.S. Army Infantry" is at the top; the unit designation is empty with the letters "REGT." on the left. The plate has four pairs of holes on each side for attachment.

Another example of this second pattern is known; it is attached to an original cap and bears the unit designation "12 REGT."

Another example of this second pattern is known; it is attached to an original cap and bears the unit designation "12th Regiment."

CAP PLATE, INFANTRY, 1812 (REPRODUCTION)

USNM 60249 (S-K 7). Figure 9.

USNM 60249 (S-K 7). Figure 9.

Figure 9

Figure 9

This is the third pattern of the infantry cap plate prescribed in the 1812 regulations. Like the preceding plate, of the second pattern, the original plate from which this reproduction was made was excavated on the site of Smith's Cantonment at Sackets Harbor, New York. Made of tin-alloy, as is the original, and rectangular with clipped corners, the piece is dominated by an unusually fierce looking eagle that first appeared on one of the 1807 half-dollars struck (p. 14) at the Philadelphia Mint. The eagle has an out-sized, curved upper beak and is grasping lightning bolts in the right talon and an olive branch in the left. Below is a panoply of flags and muskets with drum, saber, and cartridge box. The corps designation "US INFANY." is above, and the unit designation "16 REGT" is below. The "16" appears to have been added with separate die strikes. The specimen is pierced with two pairs of holes on each side for attachment.

This is the third design of the infantry cap plate outlined in the 1812 regulations. Similar to the previous design, the second pattern, the original plate from which this replica was made was found at Smith's Cantonment in Sackets Harbor, New York. Made of a tin-alloy, just like the original, and rectangular with clipped corners, the piece features a strikingly fierce eagle that was first seen on one of the 1807 half-dollars minted (p. 14) at the Philadelphia Mint. The eagle has an oversized, curved upper beak and is clutching lightning bolts in its right talon and an olive branch in its left. Below it is a mix of flags and muskets alongside a drum, saber, and cartridge box. The corps designation "US Infantry." is situated above, and the unit designation "16 REGT" is located below. The "16" appears to have been added with separate die strikes. The specimen is equipped with two pairs of holes on each side for attachment.

This third pattern was also struck in brass and silvered for wear by officers. Several fragments of such a plate were excavated at Sackets Harbor; these, although of the third pattern, are the product of a die different from that used in striking the piece described above.

This third pattern was also made in brass and silver-plated for use by officers. Several pieces of such a plate were found during excavations at Sackets Harbor; these, while still the third pattern, were made from a different die than the one used for the piece mentioned above.

DRAGOON CAP PLATE, 1812

USNM 62054-M (S-K 1807). Figure 10.

USNM 62054-M (S-K 1807). Figure 10.

Figure 10

Figure 10

This is an almost exact duplicate of the 1800 dragoon plate except that it is struck in pewter, "white metal," the color used by the infantry and dragoons. It is rectangular with clipped corners that are pierced for attachment. No detailed description of the 1812 plate has ever been found, but several identical specimens are known attached to dragoon helmets made by a contractor named Henry Cressman. The name "Cressman" is stamped on the lower side of the visor alongside the initials of an inspector named George Flomerfelt, who is known to have been employed by the Army as an inspector in Philadelphia during the period. Henry Cressman is listed in the Philadelphia directories from 1807 through 1817 as a shoemaker. From 1825 to 1839 he is listed as a military cap maker.

This is almost an exact copy of the 1800 dragoon plate, but it’s made of pewter, or "white metal," which is the color used by the infantry and dragoons. It has a rectangular shape with clipped corners that have holes for attachment. No detailed description of the 1812 plate has ever been found, but several identical pieces are known to be connected to dragoon helmets made by a contractor named Henry Cressman. The name "Cressman" is stamped on the underside of the visor next to the initials of an inspector named George Flomerfelt, who was known to have worked as an inspector for the Army in Philadelphia during that time. Henry Cressman appears in the Philadelphia directories from 1807 to 1817 as a shoemaker. From 1825 to 1839, he is listed as a military cap maker.

¶ On January 12, 1814, Irvine wrote to the Secretary of War as follows: "I send herewith an infantry cap plate which, with your permission, I will substitute for that now in use. The advantages of the former over the latter are that it is lighter, neater, and will not cost half [the] price. The present plate covers the greater part of the front of the cap, is heavy in its (p. 15) appearance, and adds much to the weight of the cap ...[57]" This proposal was approved on January 18.[58]

¶ On January 12, 1814, Irvine wrote to the Secretary of War as follows: "I am sending an infantry cap plate with this letter, which I would like to replace the one currently in use, with your permission. The benefits of the new plate over the current one are that it's lighter, looks neater, and costs less than half the price. The current plate covers most of the front of the cap, looks heavy, and makes the cap significantly heavier ...(p. 15) This proposal was approved on January 18.[58]

Figure 11.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 11.—Item in Campbell collection.

Figure 12.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 12.—Item in Campbell collection.

But here we enter an area of some confusion and controversy. Were these new plates to carry the name of the corps and/or the number of the regiment? Irvine's correspondence gives us no clue, but on the following March 28 he wrote at least two of his deputy commissary generals that he was forwarding 8,752 plates for distribution to 14 specifically named infantry regiments plus 851 "blank" plates.[59] From the total of 8,752 forwarded for specific units, it would seem that these were probably plates of the new design, but then the variance in the number sent for individual regiments—from a low of 152 for the 5th Infantry to highs of 1,016 and 1,050 for the 19th and 25th, respectively—appears odd. Specimens of the 1812 pattern are known both with and without the regimental number, while no examples of the 1814 pattern have been found with unit designation. Two extant examples of the 1814 pattern, representing two very similar but distinct designs (figs. 11, 12), were excavated at Sackets Harbor, New York, and Fort Atkinson, Nebraska, where Regular infantry served during 1813-1816 and 1819-1821, respectively. Both plates are "blank," and there is no appropriate place on either for the addition of the number of the unit, as in the case of the 1812 pattern.

But here we enter a confusing and controversial area. Should these new plates show the name of the corps and/or the number of the regiment? Irvine's correspondence gives us no hints, but on March 28, he wrote to at least two of his deputy commissary generals that he was sending 8,752 plates for distribution to 14 specific infantry regiments, plus 851 "blank" plates.[59] Out of the 8,752 sent for specific units, it seems likely these were probably plates of the new design, but the difference in the number sent to individual regiments—from a low of 152 for the 5th Infantry to highs of 1,016 and 1,050 for the 19th and 25th, respectively—seems strange. We know specimens of the 1812 pattern exist both with and without the regimental number, while no examples of the 1814 pattern have been found with a unit designation. Two existing examples of the 1814 pattern, showing two very similar but distinct designs (figs. 11, 12), were found at Sackets Harbor, New York, and Fort Atkinson, Nebraska, where Regular infantry served during 1813-1816 and 1819-1821, respectively. Both plates are "blank," and there’s no suitable place on either for adding the unit number, as with the 1812 pattern.

Another example of the 1814 pattern is known; it is attached to a bell-crowned cap of Militia origin, which indicates that the plate was adopted by the Militia after being discarded by the Regular Establishment. A plate of the same design, but struck in pewter and cut in the diamond shape popular in the 1820's and 1830's, is also known; it is obviously a Militia item.

Another example of the 1814 pattern is known; it is connected to a bell-crowned cap from the Militia, indicating that the plate was taken on by the Militia after being thrown out by the Regular Establishment. A plate of the same design, but made of pewter and shaped like diamonds, which was popular in the 1820s and 1830s, is also known; it is clearly a Militia item.

INFANTRY CAP PLATE, 1814-1821, DIE SAMPLE

USNM 60284-M (S-K 42). Figure 13.

USNM 60284-M (S-K 42). Figure 13.

Figure 13

Figure 13

Like practically all die samples, this one is struck in brass. It is rectangular with unclipped corners, but (p. 16) is marked for clipping. Within a raised oval an eagle, very similar to that on the 1812 plate, carries an olive branch in its beak, three arrows in its right talon, and thunder bolts and lightning in its left talon; below, there is a trophy of stacked muskets, drum, flag, and shield. Although this specimen is struck in brass, the plate in used specimens is known only in silver on copper, despite the fact that there was considerable talk of issuing it in brass.[60]

Like almost all die samples, this one is made of brass. It has a rectangular shape with uncropped corners, but (p. 16) is indicated for cropping. Inside a raised oval, an eagle, very similar to the one on the 1812 plate, holds an olive branch in its beak, three arrows in its right claw, and thunderbolts and lightning in its left claw; below it, there's a trophy made up of stacked muskets, a drum, a flag, and a shield. Even though this specimen is made of brass, the plate in used specimens is only known in silver on copper, despite a lot of discussion about issuing it in brass.[60]

CAP PLATE, INFANTRY OFFICER, 1814-1821

USNM 604747 (S-K 892). Figure 14.

USNM 604747 (S-K 892). Figure 14.

Figure 14

Figure 14

This plate, which is original to the hat to which it is affixed, may well have been worn by a regular infantry officer during the period 1814-1821. The cap is of the style first issued in October 1813, with the front rising above the crown.[61]

This plate, originally attached to the hat, may have been worn by a regular infantry officer between 1814 and 1821. The cap is the design first issued in October 1813, with the front rising above the crown.[61]

The plate, of silver on copper, is rectangular with four scallops top and bottom. A floral border, 3/16 of an inch wide, that surrounds the whole, strongly suggests that it was an officer's plate. Within a central oval an eagle, with wings outspread, is superimposed upon a trophy of arms and flags; above, on a ribbon, are "E PLURIBUS UNUM" and 15 5-pointed stars. It is possible that this plate is a Militia item, but the fact that it appears to be original on a leather cap of the type worn by Regulars makes it more likely that it is another example of officers' license in the matter of insignia during this period. Its attachment to the cap is a variant method: two hasp-like metal loops, affixed to the plate, have been run through holes in the hat and a leather thong threaded (p. 17) through them. Most cap plates of this period were pierced at the corners for attachment by threads.

The plate, made of silver on copper, is rectangular with four scalloped edges on the top and bottom. A floral border, 3/16 of an inch wide, surrounds the entire piece, suggesting it was an officer's plate. In the center, there's an oval design featuring an eagle with outstretched wings, placed over a trophy of arms and flags; above it, on a ribbon, are "Out of many, one" and 15 five-pointed stars. This plate might be a Militia item, but since it appears original on a leather cap typically worn by Regulars, it's more likely to be another example of officers' leeway regarding insignia during this time. The way it's attached to the cap is unusual: two metal loops, similar to hasps, are secured to the plate, threaded through holes in the hat, and a leather thong is woven (p. 17) through them. Most cap plates from this period had holes in the corners for attachment with threads.

Figure 15.—Specimen in Fort Erie Museum, Ontario, Canada.

Figure 15.—Item in Fort Erie Museum, Ontario, Canada.

Figure 16.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 16.—Item in Campbell collection.

¶ The cap plates issued to the artillery regiments (less the Regiment of Light Artillery) and the riflemen during the period 1812-1821 are known, but only a fragment of one is represented in the national collections. Illustrations of all extant are included to complete the picture. Two of the 1812 plates issued the 2d Regiment of Artillery (fig. 15) have been excavated at Fort Erie, Ontario, and are in the collections of the museum there. A plate of the 3d Regiment (fig. 16) excavated at Sackets Harbor, New York, is of an entirely different design. The lower third of a plate of the 1st Regiment (fig. 17), again of a different design, was excavated by the authors in 1961. In 1814, when the three regiments were consolidated into the Corps of Artillery, these plates were superseded by one bearing the eagle-on-cannon device closely resembling the button of the artillery for the period 1814-1821, which has the word "Corps" inscribed.[62] Specimens of this latter plate representing two distinct though similar designs have been excavated at posts known to have been manned by Regular artillery in 1814 and later (figs. 18, 19). The same general design appears also on cross-belt plates and waist-belt plates (see below pp. 34-35).

¶ The cap plates given to the artillery regiments (except the Regiment of Light Artillery) and the riflemen from 1812 to 1821 are known, but only a small piece of one is found in the national collections. Illustrations of all existing plates are included to provide a complete overview. Two of the 1812 plates issued to the 2nd Regiment of Artillery (fig. 15) have been dug up at Fort Erie, Ontario, and are in the museum's collections there. A plate from the 3rd Regiment (fig. 16) found at Sackets Harbor, New York, has a completely different design. The lower section of a plate from the 1st Regiment (fig. 17) was discovered by the authors in 1961, and it too features a different design. In 1814, when the three regiments merged into the Corps of Artillery, these plates were replaced by one featuring the eagle-on-cannon design that closely resembles the button used by the artillery between 1814 and 1821, which includes the word "Corps" inscribed.[62] Examples of this new plate design, which has two distinctive yet similar designs, have been uncovered at posts known to have been staffed by Regular artillery in 1814 and afterward (figs. 18, 19). The same general design also appears on cross-belt plates and waist-belt plates (see below pp. 34-35).

CAP PLATE, 1ST REGIMENT ARTILLERY, 1812

USNM 67240-M. Figure 17.

USNM 67240-M. Fig. 17.

Figure 17

Figure 17

The over-all design of the plate of which this brass-struck fragment represents approximately one-third can be rather accurately surmised by comparing it with several of the ornamented buttons issued to the infantry in 1812-1815. It is probably the work of the same designer.[63] The plate is rectangular with (p. 18) clipped corners. Within a raised border is an oval surrounded by cannon, cannon balls, and a drum, with the unit designation "1 RT ARTY". At the top of the oval can be seen grasping claws, obviously those of an eagle (as sketched in by the artist) and similar to those on the buttons referred to above. Single holes at the clipped corners provided means of attachment. It seems probable that the design of the missing portion also include flags and additional arms and accoutrements.

The overall design of the plate that this brass fragment represents about one-third of can be fairly accurately guessed by comparing it with several of the decorative buttons issued to the infantry from 1812-1815. It’s likely the work of the same designer.[63] The plate is rectangular with (p. 18) clipped corners. Inside a raised border is an oval surrounded by cannons, cannonballs, and a drum, featuring the unit designation "1 RT ARTY". At the top of the oval, you can see grasping claws, clearly those of an eagle (as sketched by the artist) and similar to those on the aforementioned buttons. Single holes at the clipped corners allowed for attachment. It seems likely that the design of the missing portion also included flags and additional weapons and equipment.

¶ The design of the "yellow front plate" authorized and issued to the Regiment of Light Artillery[64] in 1812 was unknown for many years. In May 1961 one of the authors fortunately located this plate (fig. 20) in the collections of the Niagara Historical Society Museum at Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, included in a group of British badges of the War of 1812 period. There can be no doubt that the specimen is American: the eagle's head is of the same design as that on the third pattern 1812 infantry cap plate (fig. 9); the wreath of laurel appears on both the 1800 and 1812 dragoon helmet plates; and the thunderbolts in the eagle's right talon are wholly American, as opposed to British, and are of the period. In the Fort Ticonderoga Museum collections there is a gold signet ring (original owner unknown) that has an almost identical design.

¶ The design of the "yellow front plate" approved and issued to the Regiment of Light Artillery[64] in 1812 was a mystery for many years. In May 1961, one of the authors lucked out and found this plate (fig. 20) in the collections of the Niagara Historical Society Museum at Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, among a group of British badges from the War of 1812 era. There's no doubt that this specimen is American: the eagle's head matches the design on the third pattern 1812 infantry cap plate (fig. 9); the laurel wreath appears on both the 1800 and 1812 dragoon helmet plates; and the thunderbolts in the eagle's right talon are distinctly American, not British, and date back to that period. In the Fort Ticonderoga Museum collections, there's a gold signet ring (original owner unknown) that features an almost identical design.

Figure 18.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 18.—Item in Campbell collection.

This is one of the largest plates ever worn by the Regular Establishment. It measures 4-1/4 by 5-1/4 inches, and it is not surprising that it was replaced because of its size. On May 19, 1814, the Commissary General of Purchases wrote Lt. Col. J. R. Fenwick, second-in-command of the light artillery, asking his opinion of a new design and stating flatly: "The present light artillery plate is too large by one-half."[65] The plate illustrated as figure 21 is offered as a possible (p. 19) example of the 1814 design. A matching waist-belt plate is described below (p. 34).

This is one of the largest plates ever worn by the Regular Establishment. It measures 4-1/4 by 5-1/4 inches, so it’s no surprise it was replaced due to its size. On May 19, 1814, the Commissary General of Purchases wrote to Lt. Col. J. R. Fenwick, the second-in-command of the light artillery, asking for his thoughts on a new design and stating clearly: "The current light artillery plate is too large by one-half."[65] The plate shown in figure 21 is provided as a possible (p. 19) example of the 1814 design. A matching waist-belt plate is described below (p. 34).

Figure 19.—Specimen in U.S. Army Artillery and Missile Center Museum, Fort Sill, Oklahoma.

Figure 19.—Item on display at the U.S. Army Artillery and Missile Center Museum, Fort Sill, Oklahoma.

Figure 20.—Specimen in Niagara Historical Society Museum, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, Canada.

Figure 20.—Specimen in the Niagara Historical Society Museum, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, Canada.

Figure 21.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 21.—Item in Campbell collection.

Figure 22.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 22.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

 

Figure 23.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 23.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

There are four different patterns of riflemen's cap plates that can be fairly bracketed in three periods. The large (6-1/4 by 5 inches) diamond-shaped brass plate with the letters "R.R." (fig. 22) was adopted for wear in the spring of 1812 as replacement for the letters "USRR" that had been worn on the cap since the organization of the Regiment of Riflemen in 1808. It was excavated in the interior of one of the barracks comprising Smith's Cantonment at Sackets Harbor, New York, where riflemen were stationed as early as August 1812. The style of the "R" is very similar to that on the 1812 Artillery cap plate, and the "R.R." designation conforms to that on the button authorized for the riflemen in 1808. The pattern of the second diamond-shaped plate (fig. 23), also in brass and almost identical in size, although a ground find, is more difficult to account for, despite the fact that it most certainly falls in the (p. 20) same period. The most logical explanation seems that the riflemen, who considered themselves a cut above the common infantry, became disgruntled with the utter plainness of their plates when compared with those just issued the infantry, and asked for and received, possibly late in 1812, the plate with the eagle and the designation "U.S. Rifle Men." The fact that the plate bears the designation "1 REGT"—although there were no other rifle regiments from 1812 to 1814—can be explained by reference to the "national color" of the Rifle Regiment completed in 1808, which bore the inscription "1st Rifle Regt.—U.S." and the standard and national color of the light artillery which were inscribed "The First Regiment of Light Artillery" when there was never more than one light artillery unit in the Army.[66] In any case, accurate dating of the third and fourth patterns definitely places the second pattern in the 1812-1813 period by process of elimination. It was superseded in 1814[67] very possibly for the same reason that the infantry plate was changed—heaviness in both appearance and weight—and replaced by a plate with a "design similar to that of the button ... flat yellow buttons which shall exhibit a bugle surrounded by stars with the number of the regiment within the curve of the bugle."[68] At least three specimens of this third-pattern plate are known. They all are 3-1/4 inches in diameter, and thus are large enough for a hat frontpiece and too large to be a cockade device. One of these plates is without a numeral (fig. 24); one has the numeral "1," and one has the numeral "4" (fig. 25). The first and second of these were found at Fort Atkinson, but very probably were not worn as late as 1819-1821. Portions of specimens of this 1814 plate have also been recovered from an early Pawnee village site in Webster County, Nebraska, indicating their possible use as trade goods after the rifle regiment changed its plates in 1817.[69] The fourth pattern, with an eagle over a horn (fig. 26) was authorized[70] in 1817. (p. 21) Apparently it was worn until 1821, since several examples of it have been found at Atkinson; other examples also are known.

There are four different types of riflemen's cap plates that can be grouped into three periods. The large (6-1/4 by 5 inches) diamond-shaped brass plate with the letters "R.R." (fig. 22) was adopted in the spring of 1812 to replace the letters "USSR" that had been worn on the cap since the Regiment of Riflemen was formed in 1808. It was discovered in one of the barracks at Smith's Cantonment in Sackets Harbor, New York, where riflemen were stationed as early as August 1812. The style of the "R" closely resembles that on the 1812 Artillery cap plate, and the "RR" designation matches the button authorized for the riflemen in 1808. The second diamond-shaped plate's pattern (fig. 23), which is also brass and nearly the same size but was found on the ground, is harder to explain, even though it likely falls within the (p. 20) same timeframe. The most reasonable explanation is that the riflemen, seeing themselves as superior to regular infantry, became unhappy with the plainness of their plates compared to the ones just issued to the infantry. They requested and received, possibly late in 1812, a plate featuring an eagle and the designation "U.S. Rifle Men." The plate's designation "1 REGT"—despite there being no other rifle regiments between 1812 and 1814—can be attributed to the "national color" of the Rifle Regiment completed in 1808, which had the inscription "1st Rifle Regt.—U.S." as well as to the standard and national color of the light artillery which was inscribed "The First Regiment of Light Artillery," even though there was never more than one light artillery unit in the Army.[66] In any case, the accurate dating of the third and fourth patterns clearly places the second pattern in the 1812-1813 period through elimination. It was replaced in 1814[67] likely for the same reason the infantry plate was changed—its bulkiness in both appearance and weight—and was replaced by a plate featuring a "design similar to that of the button ... flat yellow buttons that show a bugle surrounded by stars, with the regiment number within the curve of the bugle."[68] At least three examples of this third-pattern plate are known. They all measure 3-1/4 inches in diameter, making them large enough for a hat frontpiece and too large to be a cockade device. One of these plates lacks a numeral (fig. 24); one has the numeral "1," and one has the numeral "4" (fig. 25). The first two were found at Fort Atkinson but likely weren't worn as late as 1819-1821. Fragments of this 1814 plate have also been found at an early Pawnee village site in Webster County, Nebraska, suggesting they may have been used as trade goods after the rifle regiment switched its plates in 1817.[69] The fourth pattern, featuring an eagle over a horn (fig. 26), was authorized[70] in 1817. (p. 21) It seems to have been worn until 1821, since several examples have been found at Atkinson, along with other known examples.

Figure 24.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 24.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 25

Figure 25

Figure 26.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 26.—Specimen in the Campbell collection.

Figure 27.—Specimen in collection of Waverly P. Lewis, Devon, Connecticut.

Figure 27.—Specimen in the collection of Waverly P. Lewis, Devon, Connecticut.

The cap plate for the U.S. Military Academy, c. 1815, is illustrated (fig. 27) because it completes the cycle for insignia of the Regular Establishment for the period. Apparently it is the work of the same designer as most of the insignia of the period 1812-1815. (p. 22) Scratched on its reverse side is the name George W. Frost, a Virginian who entered the Military Academy as a cadet in 1814 and resigned on March 8, 1816.

The cap plate for the U.S. Military Academy, around 1815, is shown (fig. 27) because it completes the set of insignia for the Regular Establishment during that time. It seems to be designed by the same person as most of the insignia from 1812 to 1815. (p. 22) On the back, the name George W. Frost is scratched in; he was a Virginian who joined the Military Academy as a cadet in 1814 and left on March 8, 1816.

The two plates of the U.S. Marine Corps, despite the fact that they are naval rather than military, are included because they fit very precisely into the device design pattern of the strictly army items of the period and because they are unique in their rarity.

The two plates of the U.S. Marine Corps, even though they are naval instead of military, are included because they align perfectly with the design pattern of the strictly army items from that time and because they are unique in their rarity.

CAP PLATE, U.S. MARINE CORPS, C. 1807, DIE SAMPLE

USNM 58671-N-(1). Figure 28.

USNM 58671-N-(1). Fig. 28.

Figure 28

Figure 28

This specimen was extremely puzzling for many years. The design is obviously that of the War of 1812 period, bearing strong similarity to both the 1812 and 1814 infantry plates and the 1814 Artillery Corps plate, possibly the work of the same die sinker. The 1804 Marine Corps uniform regulations specified merely a "Brass Eagle and Plate," but the 1807 regulations called for "Octagon plates."[71] Thus there was considerable reluctance to accept this die sample as the authentic design. In the summer of 1959, however, the authors, excavating at Fort Tomkins, New York, which was known to have had a small barracks for the use of naval personnel ashore, recovered parts of two brass plates of this identical design, and in the octagon shape—that is, rectangular with clipped corners (fig. 29). The design may thus be precisely dated.

This specimen was very confusing for many years. The design clearly comes from the War of 1812 period, closely resembling both the 1812 and 1814 infantry plates and the 1814 Artillery Corps plate, possibly created by the same die sinker. The 1804 Marine Corps uniform regulations simply stated "Brass Eagle and Plate," but the 1807 regulations specified "Octagon plates."[71] As a result, there was significant hesitation to recognize this die sample as the genuine design. However, in the summer of 1959, the authors, while excavating at Fort Tomkins, New York, which was known to have a small barracks for naval personnel on land, found parts of two brass plates with this exact design in the octagon shape—that is, rectangular with clipped corners (fig. 29). Thus, the design can be accurately dated.

Figure 29

Figure 29

The specimen is struck in rectangular brass with a raised edge. The whole is dominated by an eagle that is very similar to the eagles on the infantry and artillery corps plates described above. The talons grasp the shank of a large fouled anchor; a ribbon, held in the beak and streaming overhead, is embossed with the motto "FORTITUDINE." The whole is on a trophy of arms and flags, and below the lower raised edge is embossed the word "MARINES." The excavated specimens vary slightly in size, but average 3-3/8 by 4-3/4 inches. Reproductions of this die strike were made prior to its acquisition by the National Museum, and specimens outside the national collections should be considered with caution.

The piece is made of rectangular brass with a raised edge. The center features an eagle that closely resembles those on the infantry and artillery corps plates mentioned earlier. Its talons grip the shank of a large fouled anchor; a ribbon held in its beak streams overhead and is stamped with the motto "Courage." The entire design rests on a trophy of arms and flags, and below the lower raised edge is stamped with the word "Marines." The excavated pieces vary slightly in size, but they average about 3-3/8 by 4-3/4 inches. Reproductions of this die strike were created before it was acquired by the National Museum, and specimens outside the national collections should be approached with caution.

CAP OR SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, U.S. MARINE CORPS, 1815-1825(?)

USNM 58671-N-(2). Figure 30.

USNM 58671-N-(2). Fig. 30.

Figure 30

Figure 30

This specimen is known only in die samples. Because of its similarity in design to the 1814 infantry (p. 23) plates, it cannot be dated later than 1825. Since no naval uniformed Militia units are known for the period 1815-1825, and since the plate is obviously not a device of the regular Navy, it must be assigned to the Marine Corps. In studying this plate, however, we must recognize the possibility that the maker may have been designing and sinking dies in the hope of having a sample accepted and approved for issue rather than actually executing a contract. The plate is struck in rectangular brass, and the corners are marked for clipping. The design, within a wide oval with raised edge, consists of an eagle above a trophy of arms, flags, and a shield. The right talon grasps a fluke of a fouled anchor, and the left talon holds the pike of a stand of colors. Reproductions of this die strike were made prior to its acquisition by the National Museum, and specimens outside the national collections should be considered with caution.

This specimen is known only from die samples. Because it looks similar to the 1814 infantry (p. 23) plates, it can't be dated later than 1825. Since no naval uniformed Militia units are identified for the period 1815-1825, and since the plate clearly isn't a device of the regular Navy, it must belong to the Marine Corps. However, when studying this plate, we need to keep in mind that the maker might have been designing and creating dies in hopes of having a sample accepted and approved for distribution rather than actually fulfilling a contract. The plate is made of rectangular brass, and the corners are marked for clipping. The design, within a broad oval with a raised edge, features an eagle above a trophy of arms, flags, and a shield. The right talon grasps a fluke of a fouled anchor, while the left talon holds the pike of a stand of colors. Reproductions of this die strike were made before it was acquired by the National Museum, and specimens outside the national collections should be treated with caution.

¶ The 1821 uniform regulations were significant in several respects: cap plates were eliminated as distinctive insignia of the various arms; the color of certain items of dress and equipment remained the sole distinction; and the rules regarding nonregulation dress were more precisely stated than before. The cap plates were replaced by eagles, measuring 3 inches between wing tips, and the number of the regiment was cut in the shield. Regulations tersely stated that "all articles of uniform or equipment, more or less, than those prescribed, or in any manner differing from them, are prohibited."[72] General and staff officers were to wear black sword belts with "yellow plates"; artillery officers were to wear white waist belts with a yellow oval plate 1-1/2 inches wide and with an eagle in the center; infantry officers were to wear a similar plate that was white instead of yellow. Cockade eagles for chapeau de bras were to be gold and measure 1-1/2 inches between wing tips. Since enlisted men were no longer authorized to wear swords, they had no waist belts.

¶ The 1821 uniform regulations were significant in several ways: cap plates were removed as distinctive insignia for different branches; the color of certain clothing and equipment remained the only distinction; and the rules regarding non-regulation attire were more clearly defined than before. The cap plates were replaced by eagles, which measured 3 inches between the tips of their wings, and the regiment number was included in the shield. Regulations clearly stated that "all articles of uniform or equipment, more or less, than those prescribed, or in any manner differing from them, are prohibited."[72] General and staff officers were to wear black sword belts with "yellow plates"; artillery officers were to wear white waist belts with a yellow oval plate 1-1/2 inches wide featuring an eagle in the center; infantry officers were to wear a similar plate that was white instead of yellow. Cockade eagles for chapeau de bras were to be gold and measure 1-1/2 inches between the tips of their wings. Since enlisted men were no longer allowed to wear swords, they did not have waist belts.

CAP AND PLATE, THIRD ARTILLERY, 1821

USNM 66603-M. Figure 31.

USNM 66603-M. Fig. 31.

Figure 31

Figure 31

Although several "yellow" eagles that can be attributed to the 1821-1832 period are known, this brass specimen on the bell-crowned cap is the only one known to the authors that has the prescribed regimental number cut out of the shield. The button on the pompon rosette—which appears to be definitely original to the cap, as does the eagle—carries the artillery "A," thus the assignment to that branch of (p. 24) the service. The eagle bears a close similarity to the eagles on the 1812 and 1814 infantry cap plates and the 1807 Marine Corps cap plate, and is possibly the work of the same designer.

Although several "yellow" eagles from the 1821-1832 period are recognized, this brass specimen on the bell-crowned cap is the only one known to the authors that has the required regimental number cut out of the shield. The button on the pompon rosette—which seems to definitely be original to the cap, just like the eagle—features the artillery "A,” indicating its assignment to that branch of (p. 24) the service. The eagle closely resembles the eagles on the 1812 and 1814 infantry cap plates and the 1807 Marine Corps cap plate, and it may possibly be the work of the same designer.

CAP INSIGNIA, INFANTRY, 1822

USNM 60364-M (SK-120). Figure 32.

USNM 60364-M (SK-120). Fig. 32.

Figure 32

Figure 32

Early in 1822, the Secretary of War, acting on a suggestion of Callendar Irvine, ordered that all metal equipment of the infantry be of "white metal" in keeping with its pompons, tassels, and lace.[73] This specimen, struck in copper and silvered, is believed to have been issued as a result of that order.

Early in 1822, the Secretary of War, following a suggestion from Callendar Irvine, directed that all metal equipment for the infantry should be made of "white metal" to match its pompons, tassels, and lace.[73] This piece, made from copper and silvered, is thought to have been produced as a result of that order.

¶ The 1821 regulations stated that cockade eagles should measure 1-1/2 inches between wing tips. In 1832 this wingspread was increased to 2-1/2 inches. Thus, specimens of a relatively uniform pattern and measuring approximately 1-1/2 inches in wingspread will be considered as of the Regular Army, 1821-1832. Similarly, those of a relatively uniform pattern and measuring approximately 2-1/2 inches in wingspread are dated 1832-1851.

¶ The 1821 regulations specified that cockade eagles should measure 1.5 inches between their wing tips. In 1832, this wingspan was increased to 2.5 inches. Therefore, specimens with a fairly consistent pattern measuring about 1.5 inches in wingspan will be recognized as part of the Regular Army from 1821 to 1832. Likewise, those with a relatively consistent pattern measuring about 2.5 inches in wingspan are dated from 1832 to 1851.

COCKADE EAGLE, C. 1821

USNM 60371-M (S-K 127). Figure 33.

USNM 60371-M (S-K 127). Figure 33.

Figure 33

Figure 33

This eagle, struck in brass, has wings extended, head to the right, federal shield on breast with no stars, olive branch in right talon, and three arrows in left talon.

This brass eagle has its wings spread, head facing right, a federal shield on its chest without stars, an olive branch in its right talon, and three arrows in its left talon.

COCKADE EAGLE, INFANTRY, C. 1821

USNM 60372-M (S-K 128). Not illustrated.

USNM 60372-M (S-K 128). Not illustrated.

This eagle is struck from the same die as the preceding specimen, but it is in white metal rather than brass.

This eagle is made from the same mold as the previous one, but it’s in white metal instead of brass.

COCKADE EAGLE, C. 1821

USNM 60367-M (S-K 123). Figure 34.

USNM 60367-M (S-K 123). Figure 34.

Figure 34

Figure 34

Of silver on copper, this eagle is similar to the two preceding specimens, but is struck from a variant die. It possibly was worn by the Militia.

Of silver on copper, this eagle is similar to the two previous specimens, but is made from a different die. It may have been worn by the Militia.

COCKADE EAGLE, INFANTRY, C. 1821

USNM 60373-M (S-K 130). Figure 35.

USNM 60373-M (S-K 130). Figure 35.

Figure 35

Figure 35

This specimen is very similar to those above, but it has 13 stars in the shield on the eagle's breast.

This specimen is very similar to the ones above, but it has 13 stars in the shield on the eagle's chest.

¶ Despite the fact that it was found attached to a shako of distinct Militia origin, the cap plate shown in figure 36 is believed to be that prescribed for the cadets of the Military Academy in the 1821 uniform regulations and described as "yellow plate, diamond shape." The letters "U S M A" in the angles of the diamond, the word "CADET" at the top of the oval, what appears to be the designation "W POINT" at the left top of the map, and the tools of instruction (so similar to those embellishing the cadet diploma, (p. 25) although totally different in rendering), make it difficult to assign this plate to any source other than the Academy. It is possible, of course, that this was a manufacturer's sample which was never actually adopted for wear at West Point. The apparent maker's name, "CASAD," at the bottom of the oval, does not appear in the city directories of any of the larger manufacturing centers of the period.

¶ Even though it was found attached to a distinctively Militia shako, the cap plate shown in figure 36 is believed to be the one specified for the cadets of the Military Academy in the 1821 uniform regulations and described as "yellow plate, diamond shape." The letters "U.S. Military Academy" in the corners of the diamond, the word "CADET" at the top of the oval, what looks like the designation "W POINT" at the top left of the map, and the instructional tools (which are quite similar to those on the cadet diploma, (p. 25) although rendered differently) make it hard to link this plate to anything other than the Academy. It’s possible, of course, that this was a manufacturer's sample that was never actually adopted for use at West Point. The apparent maker's name, "CASAD," at the bottom of the oval, does not show up in the city directories of any major manufacturing centers from that time.

Figure 36.—Specimen in West Point Museum, West Point, New York.

Figure 36.—Item in the West Point Museum, West Point, New York.

CAP INSIGNIA, 1832(?)

USNM 60365-M (S-K 121). Figure 37.

USNM 60365-M (S-K 121). Figure 37.

Figure 37

Figure 37

Despite the facts that there was no change in cap insignia authorized in the 1832 uniform regulations and that this specimen is similar in most respects to (p. 26) the 1821 eagle, its refinement of design and manufacture indicates that it possibly belongs to the period of the 1830's and 1840's. It is struck in thin brass and has three plain wire fasteners soldered to the reverse.

Despite the fact that there was no change in cap insignia allowed in the 1832 uniform regulations and that this example is similar in most ways to (p. 26) the 1821 eagle, its refined design and craftsmanship suggest that it likely belongs to the 1830s and 1840s. It is made of thin brass and has three plain wire fasteners soldered to the back.

CAP INSIGNIA, 1832(?)

USNM 60366-M (S-K 122). Not illustrated.

USNM 60366-M (S-K 122). Not illustrated.

Although similar to the preceding plate, this specimen measures 3-1/4 by 2-1/4 inches, is struck from a different die, and has a much wider breast shield. Of somewhat heavier brass than most such similar eagles and exhibiting a well-developed patina, it may have been an officer's device.

Although similar to the previous plate, this specimen measures 3-1/4 by 2-1/4 inches, is made from a different die, and has a much wider breast shield. It’s made of slightly heavier brass than most similar eagles and shows a well-developed patina, so it may have been an officer's device.

CAP PLATE, DRAGOONS, 1833

USNM 60276-M (S-K 34). Figure 38.

USNM 60276-M (S-K 34). Figure 38.

Figure 38

Figure 38

When the dragoons returned to the Army in 1833, their cap device was described as "a gilt star, silver eagle ... the star to be worn in front."[74] An 8-pointed, sunburst-type star, this plate is struck in brass and has a superimposed eagle that is struck in brass and silvered. The eagle is basically the Napoleonic type adopted by the British after the Battle of Waterloo and altered by omitting the lightning in the talons and adding a wreath to the breast. Plain wire fasteners are soldered to the back.

When the dragoons returned to the Army in 1833, their cap device was described as "a gilt star, silver eagle ... the star to be worn in front."[74] An 8-pointed, sunburst-style star, this plate is made of brass and features a superimposed eagle that is also made of brass with a silver finish. The eagle is basically of the Napoleonic design adopted by the British after the Battle of Waterloo, modified by removing the lightning in the talons and adding a wreath to the breast. Simple wire fasteners are soldered to the back.

¶ In 1834, possibly as a result of the newly organized dragoons receiving distinctive branch insignia, the infantry and artillery once again were authorized devices on the dress cap designating their particular arm. The gilt eagle was retained. Below the eagle was an open horn with cords and tassels in silver for infantry, and cross cannons in "gilt" for artillery. The number of the regiment was added over the cannon or within the curve of the horn. These devices remained in use until the change in headgear in 1851.

¶ In 1834, likely because the newly organized dragoons were given unique branch insignia, infantry and artillery were once again allowed to have devices on their dress caps that identified their specific branch. The gilt eagle was kept. Below the eagle, there was an open horn with silver cords and tassels for infantry, and cross cannons in "gilt" for artillery. The regiment number was added above the cannon or within the curve of the horn. These designs were used until the shift in headgear in 1851.

CAP INSIGNIA, INFANTRY, 1834-1851

USNM 62055-M, 62056-M (SK-1808, 1809). Figure 39.

USNM 62055-M, 62056-M (SK-1808, 1809). Figure 39.

Figure 39

Figure 39

This eagle is similar to the 1821 pattern, although somewhat more compact in design. It is struck in brass, has wings upraised, head to the right, shield on breast, olive branch in right talon, and three arrows in left talon. The open horn, struck in brass and silvered, is suspended, with bell to the right, by four twisted cords tied in a 3-leaf-clover knot; the tassels on the four cord-ends hang below.

This eagle resembles the 1821 design, but it's a bit more compact. It's made of brass, has its wings upraised, head facing right, a shield on its chest, an olive branch in its right talon, and three arrows in its left talon. The open horn, made of brass and silvered, hangs with the bell to the right, supported by four twisted cords tied in a 3-leaf clover knot; the tassels at the ends of the cords hang down.

CAP INSIGNIA, ARTILLERY, 1834-1851

USNM 60426-M (S-K 182). Figure 40.

USNM 60426-M (S-K 182). Figure 40.

Figure 40

Figure 40

This is the "gilt ... cross cannons" device prescribed for artillery in the 1834 regulations. Struck in sheet brass of medium thickness, the superimposed cannon has trunnions and dolphins.

This is the "gilt ... cross cannons" design specified for artillery in the 1834 regulations. Made from medium-thickness sheet brass, the overlapping cannon features trunnions and dolphins.

FORAGE CAP STAR, DRAGOON OFFICER, C. 1840

USNM 604967-M (S-K 1111). Figure 41.

USNM 604967-M (S-K 1111). Figure 41.

Figure 41

Figure 41

Although uniform regulations for the period of the 1830's and 1840's make no mention of a distinctive device for the dragoon forage cap, photographs in the National Archives show that officers' caps, at least, carried a 6-pointed star, apparently gold-embroidered.[75] This specimen is believed to be such a star. Made of gold bullion and with rather large sequins sewed onto a heavy paper background, the star is mounted on dark blue wool. The (p. 27) points of the star are extended with gold embroidery on the cloth.

Although uniform regulations from the 1830s and 1840s don't mention a specific emblem for the dragoon forage cap, photos in the National Archives reveal that at least the officers’ caps featured a 6-pointed star, likely embroidered in gold.[75] This item is thought to be such a star. Crafted from gold bullion with large sequins stitched onto a heavy paper backing, the star is attached to dark blue wool. The (p. 27) points of the star are embellished with gold embroidery on the fabric.

CAP INSIGNIA. CADET'S, U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY, 1842, AND ENGINEER SOLDIERS, 1846

USNM 604529 (S-K 676) Figure 42.

USNM 604529 (S-K 676) Figure 42.

Figure 42

Figure 42

In 1839 the cadets at the Military Academy discarded the bell-crowned caps they had worn since 1821 and wore a cylindrical black shako similar to that worn by the Regular artillery and infantry. The (p. 28) artillery gilt eagle and crossed cannon replaced the diamond-shaped plate on the front. In 1842-1843 the crossed cannon were replaced by the engineer castle as more in keeping with the original mission of the Academy and the general orientation of its curriculum.

In 1839, the cadets at the Military Academy stopped wearing the bell-crowned caps they had used since 1821 and switched to a cylindrical black shako, similar to the ones worn by the Regular artillery and infantry. The (p. 28) artillery gilt eagle and crossed cannons replaced the diamond-shaped plate on the front. In 1842-1843, the crossed cannons were replaced by the engineer castle to better align with the Academy's original mission and the overall focus of its curriculum.

Shortly after the beginning of hostilities with Mexico in 1846, the Congress authorized the enlistment of a company of "engineer soldiers" that was designated the Company of Sappers, Miners, and Pontoniers. These were the first enlisted men authorized the Corps of Engineers since the period of the War of 1812. The headgear for these men was prescribed as "Schako—same pattern as that of the artillery, bearing a yellow eagle over a castle like that worn by the Cadets."[76]

Shortly after hostilities with Mexico began in 1846, Congress approved the enlistment of a group of "engineer soldiers," which was named the Company of Sappers, Miners, and Pontoniers. These were the first enlisted men authorized for the Corps of Engineers since the War of 1812. Their headgear was specified as "Schako—same style as that of the artillery, featuring a yellow eagle over a castle, similar to what the Cadets wore."[76]

Struck in thin to medium brass, this plate is the familiar turreted castle of the Corps of Engineers so well known today. It was worn below the eagle.

Struck in thin to medium brass, this plate features the well-known turreted castle of the Corps of Engineers. It was worn below the eagle.

¶ To complete the branches of the Regular Establishment during the Mexican War period, the Regiment of Voltigeurs and Foot Riflemen must be mentioned, although they were apparently without any distinctive branch insignia.

¶ To finish the branches of the Regular Establishment during the Mexican War period, we should mention the Regiment of Voltigeurs and Foot Riflemen, even though they apparently didn't have any unique branch insignia.

The regiment was constituted on February 11, 1847, and its uniform[77] was prescribed 9 days later in the War Department's General Order No. 7. However, the regiment was issued infantry woolen jackets and trousers and never received what little gray issue clothing was sent to them in Mexico almost a year later. Uniform trimmings were to be as for the infantry, with the substitution of the letter "v" where appropriate. So far as presently known, this substitution affected only the button pattern—an appropriate letter "v" on the shield centered on the eagle's breast.

The regiment was formed on February 11, 1847, and its uniform[77] was defined 9 days later in the War Department's General Order No. 7. However, the regiment was given infantry woolen jackets and trousers and never received the little gray clothing that was sent to them in Mexico nearly a year later. The uniform details were to be the same as those for the infantry, with the letter "v" substituted where it was needed. As far as we know, this change only affected the button design—an appropriate letter "v" on the shield centered on the eagle's chest.

The 1851 uniform regulations radically changed almost every item of the Army's dress. Most of the distinctive devices were also altered, although more in size and composition than general design. Some devices were completely eliminated. While officers retained insignia of their arm or branch on their hats, enlisted personnel, with the exception of those of engineers and ordnance, had only the letter of their company, their particular arm being designated by the color of collars, cuffs, bands on hats, pompons, epaulets, chevrons, and the like. A newly designed sword or waist-belt plate was prescribed for all personnel. All items of uniform and insignia authorized in 1851 were included in an illustrated edition of the Regulations for the Uniform and Dress of the Army of the United States, June 1851, published by William H. Horstmann and Sons, well-known uniform and insignia dealers in Philadelphia.[78]

The 1851 uniform regulations changed almost every aspect of the Army's dress. Most of the distinctive items were also modified, mainly in size and composition rather than overall design. Some items were completely removed. While officers kept their arm or branch insignia on their hats, enlisted personnel, except for those in engineering and ordnance, only had the letter of their company. Their specific arm was indicated by the color of their collars, cuffs, hat bands, pompons, epaulets, chevrons, and similar features. A new sword or waist-belt plate was required for all personnel. All uniform items and insignia authorized in 1851 were included in an illustrated edition of the Regulations for the Uniform and Dress of the Army of the United States, June 1851, published by William H. Horstmann and Sons, a well-known uniform and insignia retailer in Philadelphia.[78]

POMPON EAGLE, 1851

USNM 604853 (S-K 998). Figure 43.

USNM 604853 (S-K 998). Figure 43.

Figure 43

Figure 43

Worn attached to the base of the pompon by all enlisted personnel, this brass eagle, similar in general design to that worn on the shako in the 1830's, stands with wings upraised, olive branch in right talon, three arrows in left talon, and a scroll, with national motto, in beak. Above are stars, clouds, and bursts of sun rays. Officers wore an eagle of similar design of gold embroidery on cloth.

Worn by all enlisted personnel at the base of the pompon, this brass eagle, similar in general design to the one worn on the shako in the 1830s, stands with its wings upraised, holding an olive branch in its right talon, three arrows in its left talon, and a scroll with the national motto in its beak. Above are stars, clouds, and bursts of sunlight. Officers wore a similar eagle designed in gold embroidery on fabric.

CAP INSIGNIA, GENERAL AND STAFF OFFICERS, 1851

USNM 604862 (S-K 1007). Figure 44.

USNM 604862 (S-K 1007). Figure 44.

Figure 44

Figure 44

This specimen, in accord with regulations, is on dark blue cloth and consists of a gold-embroidered wreath encircling Old English letters "U.S." in silver bullion. Embroidered insignia of this period were all made by hand, and they varied considerably in both detail and size. During the 1861-1865 period the same design was made about half this size for wear on officers' forage caps, and the device appeared in variant forms. One example is known where the numeral "15" is embroidered over the letters "U.S.";[79] and Miller's Photographic History of the Civil War includes several photos of general officers whose wreath insignia on the forage cap substitute small rank insignia stars for the letters.

This item, in line with regulations, is made of dark blue fabric and features a gold-embroidered wreath surrounding the Old English letters "U.S." in silver thread. The embroidered insignia from this era were all handcrafted and varied significantly in both detail and size. During the 1861-1865 period, a version of the same design was made about half this size for officers' forage caps, and the device appeared in various forms. One known example has the numeral "15" embroidered over the letters "USA";[79] and Miller's Photographic History of the Civil War features several photos of general officers whose wreath insignia on the forage cap replace the letters with small rank insignia stars.

CAP INSIGNIA, OFFICER, ENGINEERS, 1851

USNM 300720. Figure 45.

USNM 300720. Fig. 45.

Figure 45

Figure 45

On dark blue cloth, this device comprises a gold-embroidered wreath of laurel and palm encircling a turreted castle in silver metal as prescribed in regulations. (p. 29) Other examples are known with the castle embroidered.

On dark blue fabric, this device features a gold-embroidered wreath of laurel and palm surrounding a turreted silver castle, as specified in the regulations. (p. 29) Other versions exist with the castle embroidered.

HAT INSIGNIA, OFFICER, ARTILLERY, 1851

USNM 604872 (S-K 1017). Figure 46.

USNM 604872 (S-K 1017). Figure 46.

Figure 46

Figure 46

This specimen adheres almost exactly to the 1851 regulations, but it lacks the number of the regiment as called for. The number was a separate insignia embroidered above the cannon. The cannon are of gold embroidery. The device was also made in gold metal imitation-embroidery in several variant designs.

This specimen follows the 1851 regulations almost perfectly, but it doesn't have the regiment number as required. The number was a separate insignia stitched above the cannon. The cannons are made of gold embroidery. The design was also created in gold metal imitation-embroidery in several different styles.

CAP INSIGNIA, OFFICER, INFANTRY, 1851

USNM 604888 (S-K 1033). Figure 47.

USNM 604888 (S-K 1033). Figure 47.

Figure 47

Figure 47

On dark blue cloth, this device is the well-known looped horn in gold embroidery with three cords and tassels. The regimental number "4," in silver bullion, lies within the loop of the horn. This insignia is also common in metal imitation-embroidery.

On dark blue fabric, this device is the famous looped horn in gold embroidery with three cords and tassels. The regimental number "4," in silver bullion, is positioned within the loop of the horn. This insignia is also commonly seen in metal imitation-embroidery.

CAP AND COLLAR INSIGNIA, ENLISTED ORDNANCE, 1851

USNM 604520 (S-K 667). Figure 48.

USNM 604520 (S-K 667). Figure 48.

Figure 48

Figure 48

Struck in brass, this device was worn on the caps and coat collars of ordnance enlisted personnel. Although the shell and flame insignia appears in a (p. 30) number of variations of design, this specimen conforms exactly to the regulations of 1851 as published by Horstmann.

Struck in brass, this device was worn on the caps and coat collars of ordnance enlisted personnel. Although the shell and flame insignia appears in a (p. 30) number of design variations, this specimen conforms exactly to the 1851 regulations published by Horstmann.

CAP AND COLLAR INSIGNIA, ENGINEER SOLDIERS, 1851

USNM 61618. Figure 49.

USNM 61618. Figure 49.

Figure 49

Figure 49

The 1851 uniform regulations called for a "castle of yellow metal one and five-eighths inches by one and one-fourth inches high" on both the coat collar and the hat of "Engineer Soldiers." This specimen, struck in brass, conforms exactly to the descriptions and drawing in the Horstmann publication of the regulations.

The 1851 uniform regulations specified a "castle of yellow metal one and five-eighths inches by one and one-fourth inches high" on both the coat collar and the hat of "Engineer Soldiers." This piece, made of brass, matches the descriptions and illustrations in the Horstmann publication of the regulations.

CAP INSIGNIA, DRAGOON OFFICERS, 1851

USNM 604879 (S-K 1024). Figure 50.

USNM 604879 (S-K 1024). Figure 50.

Figure 50

Figure 50

Comprising crossed sabers of gold, with edges upward, this insignia is similar to the well-known device worn by the Regular cavalry as late as 1953.

Comprising crossed gold sabers with the blades pointing up, this insignia is similar to the familiar emblem worn by the Regular cavalry as recently as 1953.

¶ In 1846 the Regiment of Mounted Riflemen was organized to consolidate the northern route to the Pacific by establishing and manning a series of posts along the Oregon Trail.[80] The outbreak of the War with Mexico postponed this mission and the unit was diverted to the theater of operations. Shortly after the regiment was constituted it was authorized (p. 31) to wear a forage cap device prescribed as "a gold embroidered spread eagle, with the letter R in silver, on the shield."[81] No surviving specimen of this insignia is known, and there seems some doubt that it was ever actually manufactured.[82]

¶ In 1846, the Regiment of Mounted Riflemen was created to strengthen the northern route to the Pacific by setting up and staffing a series of posts along the Oregon Trail.[80] The start of the War with Mexico delayed this mission, and the unit was redirected to the operations area. Shortly after the regiment was formed, it was authorized to wear a forage cap insignia described as "a gold embroidered spread eagle, with the letter R in silver, on the shield."[81] No surviving example of this insignia is known, and there seems to be some uncertainty that it was ever actually produced.[82]

CAP INSIGNIA, OFFICER, REGIMENT OF MOUNTED RIFLEMEN, 1850

USNM 604854 (SK 999). Figure 51.

USNM 604854 (SK 999). Figure 51.

Figure 51

Figure 51

In 1850 the regiment was given a "trumpet" hat device. Officers were to wear "a trumpet, perpendicular, embroidered in gold, with the number of the regiment, in silver, within the bend."[83] This trumpet is also known in metal imitation-embroidery. The prescribed regimental number, which is illustrated in the Horstmann publication of the regulations (pl. 15), is not included on the device, probably because there was but one such unit in the Regular Establishment.

In 1850, the regiment was given a "trumpet" hat device. Officers were required to wear "a trumpet, upright, embroidered in gold, with the regiment's number, in silver, within the bend."[83] This trumpet is also available in metal imitation embroidery. The specified regimental number, shown in the Horstmann publication of the regulations (pl. 15), is not included on the device, likely because there was only one such unit in the Regular Establishment.

CAP INSIGNIA, ENLISTED, REGIMENT OF MOUNTED RIFLEMEN, 1850

USNM 62053-M (SK-1806). Figure 52.

USNM 62053-M (SK-1806). Fig. 52.

Figure 52

Figure 52

The same general order that gave rifle officers a gold-embroidered trumpet prescribed for enlisted men a similar device to be of "yellow metal." This insignia lasted but one year for the men in the ranks, being unmentioned in the 1851 regulations.

The same general order that provided rifle officers with a gold-embroidered trumpet required that enlisted men have a similar device made of "yellow metal." This insignia lasted only one year for the men in the ranks, as it was not mentioned in the 1851 regulations.

Shoulder-Belt and Waist-Belt Plates

Oval shoulder-belt plates were worn by American officers during the War of the Revolution, but no extant specimens are known. Highly ornamented or engraved officers' plates for the period after 1790 are in several collections (fig. 53) and others are illustrated in contemporary portraits (fig. 54). Just what year shoulder-belt plates were issued to enlisted personnel is unknown, but their use appears to have been well established by 1812. The uniform regulations for that year specified swords for sergeants of infantry to be "worn with a white cross belt 3-1/2 inches wide," but nothing was said about a device on the belt.[84]

Oval shoulder-belt plates were worn by American officers during the Revolutionary War, but no existing examples are known. Highly decorative or engraved officers' plates from the period after 1790 are part of several collections (fig. 53) and others are shown in contemporary portraits (fig. 54). The exact year when shoulder-belt plates were issued to enlisted personnel isn’t clear, but their use seems to have been well established by 1812. The uniform regulations for that year specified that sergeants of infantry should wear swords with a white cross belt 3-1/2 inches wide, but there was no mention of any emblem on the belt.[84]

(p. 32)

Figure 53.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 53.—Specimen in the Campbell collection.

Normally, brass or "yellow metal" plates were authorized for the artillery and silvered or "white metal" for the infantry and dragoons, as consonant with the rest of their trimmings. In actuality, however, white-metal shoulder-belt plates do not seem to have been issued to the infantry prior to 1814, and brass ones were still being issued in 1815.[85] Most of these plates were plain oval, although a few are known that were struck with devices similar to those on cap plates; and at least one rectangular cap plate, fitted with the two studs and hook on the reverse normal to shoulder-belt plates, has been found. It seems probable that these were officers' plates. Oval brass plates have been found that are identical in size and construction to the plain ones but with the letters "U.S." embossed on them; however, these are difficult to date.

Usually, brass or "yellow metal" plates were approved for the artillery, while silvered or "white metal" was designated for the infantry and dragoons, consistent with their other insignia. However, in reality, white-metal shoulder-belt plates don't appear to have been issued to the infantry before 1814, and brass ones were still being distributed in 1815.[85] Most of these plates were simple oval shapes, although a few have been discovered featuring designs like those on cap plates; and at least one rectangular cap plate, equipped with the two studs and a hook on the back typical of shoulder-belt plates, has been found. It's likely that these were officers' plates. Oval brass plates identical in size and design to the plain ones but with the letters "United States" embossed on them have been located; however, these are hard to date.

Figure 54.—Portrait in collection of The Filson Club, Louisville, Kentucky.

Figure 54.—Portrait in the collection of The Filson Club, Louisville, Kentucky.

It is extremely doubtful that waist-belt plates were issued to enlisted personnel of foot units during this period. In 1808 enlisted dragoons were authorized a waist-belt plate of tinned brass and, as far as known, perfectly plain.[86]

It is very unlikely that waist-belt plates were given to enlisted soldiers in foot units during this time. In 1808, enlisted dragoons were allowed to have a waist-belt plate made of tinned brass, which, as far as we know, was completely plain.[86]

The 1812 regulations prescribed for the light dragoons a "buff leather waist belt, white plate in front with eagle in relief," and there is the possibility that the light artillery had such. In actuality, there was no call for a waist belt where a shoulder belt was authorized. Neither civilian trousers nor the few surviving military "pantaloons" of the period are fitted with belt loops, trousers being held up either by suspenders or by being buttoned directly to the shirt or waistcoat. No example of the dragoon plate has been found. However, a rather tantalizing possibility exists—a fragment of a pewter belt plate (fig. 55) was excavated at Sackets Harbor, New York, where the light dragoons are known to have served. The 1816 regulations specified for artillerymen "waist belts of white leather two inches wide, yellow oval plate of the same width." It is not made clear, however, whether this belt and plate was for (p. 33) officers only or for all ranks. The unusually striking oval specimen (fig. 56) may be this plate, but its ornateness indicates that this particular design was for officers only.

The 1812 regulations required light dragoons to have a "buff leather waist belt, white plate in front with an eagle in relief," and it’s possible that the light artillery had something similar. In reality, there was no need for a waist belt when a shoulder belt was allowed. Civilian trousers and the few remaining military "pantaloons" from that time don’t have belt loops; the trousers were held up either by suspenders or by being buttoned directly to the shirt or waistcoat. No dragoon plate has been found. However, there’s an intriguing possibility—a piece of a pewter belt plate (fig. 55) was uncovered at Sackets Harbor, New York, where the light dragoons are known to have served. The 1816 regulations stated that artillerymen should have "waist belts of white leather two inches wide, yellow oval plate of the same width." It's not clear, though, whether this belt and plate were for (p. 33) officers only or for all ranks. The unusually striking oval specimen (fig. 56) might be this plate, but its elaborate design suggests it was meant for officers only.

Figure 55.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 55.—Item in Campbell collection.

Figure 56.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 56.—Item in Campbell collection.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, 1790(?)-1812

USNM 12804. Figure 57.

USNM 12804. Fig. 57.

Figure 57

Figure 57

This plate was worn by Peter Gansevoort sometime during his military career, probably after 1790. Gansevoort, between 1775 and his death in 1812, was successively major, lieutenant colonel, colonel, and brigadier general of New York State Militia and brigadier general U.S. Army (1809-1812). Although distinctly Militia in design, the specimen is included here as an example of the wide variety of such devices worn by officers of the 1800-1821 period.

This plate was worn by Peter Gansevoort during his military career, likely after 1790. From 1775 until his death in 1812, Gansevoort held the ranks of major, lieutenant colonel, colonel, and brigadier general in the New York State Militia, and he served as a brigadier general in the U.S. Army from 1809 to 1812. Although it clearly has a Militia design, this item is included here as an example of the diverse range of devices worn by officers during the 1800-1821 period.

This plate is octagonal, slightly convex, and has beveled edges. The design is hand engraved on copper, and the whole is gold plated. Within an engraved border is the eagle-on-half-globe device of New York State. Two studs and a hook soldered to the reverse are not believed to be original.

This plate is octagonal, slightly curved, and has beveled edges. The design is hand-engraved on copper, and it’s completely gold-plated. Inside an engraved border is the eagle-on-half-globe emblem of New York State. Two studs and a hook soldered to the back are not thought to be original.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, INFANTRY OFFICER, C. 1812

USNM 604313 (S-K 469). Figure 58.

USNM 604313 (S-K 469). Figure 58.

Figure 58

Figure 58

This rectangular, slightly convex plate of silver on copper has beveled edges and a small slot in the center for the attachment of an ornament. The ornament is missing, although it can be surmised that it was an eagle. The reverse is fitted with two studs and a hook and bears the hallmark of "W. Pinchin, Philada." William Pinchin is listed in the Philadelphia directory for 1809 as a silversmith at 326 Sassafras Street. The 1810 directory lists only "Widow of," but another William Pinchin (probably the son) appears in the 1820's.

This rectangular, slightly curved silver plate on copper has beveled edges and a small slot in the center for attaching an ornament. The ornament is missing, though it’s likely it was an eagle. The back has two studs and a hook and features the hallmark of "W. Pinchin, Philada." William Pinchin is listed in the Philadelphia directory for 1809 as a silversmith at 326 Sassafras Street. The 1810 directory only lists "Widow of," but another William Pinchin (probably his son) shows up in the 1820s.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, LIGHT ARTILLERY(?), 1814-1821

USNM 60452-M (S-K 208). Figure 59.

USNM 60452-M (S-K 208). Figure 59.

Figure 59

Figure 59

The design of this rectangular plate, struck in rather heavy brass, is the same as that offered as the (p. 34) 1814-pattern cap plate for the light artillery, although it is the product of a different and somewhat more crudely sunk die. The piece is dominated by an eagle with wings upraised, a shield on its breast, three arrows in its right talon, and an olive branch in its left talon. Crossed cannon are in the foreground, and there is a pile of six cannon balls in the lower right corner. The whole is superimposed on a trophy of colors and bayoneted muskets. Above is a 5-pointed "star of stars" made up of 20 5-pointed stars.

The design of this rectangular plate, made from rather heavy brass, is the same as the (p. 34) 1814-pattern cap plate for light artillery, although it was created using a different and somewhat more roughly made die. The piece features an eagle with its wings raised, a shield on its breast, three arrows in its right claw, and an olive branch in its left claw. Crossed cannons are in the foreground, and there’s a stack of six cannonballs in the lower right corner. The whole design is layered over a trophy of colors and bayoneted muskets. Above it is a 5-pointed "star of stars" composed of 20 5-pointed stars.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, OFFICER, ARTILLERY CORPS, 1814-1821

USNM 60448-M (S-K 204). Figure 60.

USNM 60448-M (S-K 204). Figure 60.

Figure 60

Figure 60

The rectangular plate is struck in brass on a die of the same design as that used in making the 1814 Artillery Corps cap plate, type I (p. 18). Before the strike was made, a piece of thin sheet iron, slightly narrower than the finished product, was applied to the reverse of the brass. After the strike, which shows through clearly on the iron, the ends of this applied metal were bent inward into tongues for attachments to the belt, and the remainder of the back was filled with pewter. The edges of the obverse were then beveled to finish the product. It seems very probable that plates such as this were produced for sale to officers.

The rectangular plate is made of brass and stamped on a die that's the same as the one used for the 1814 Artillery Corps cap plate, type I (p. 18). Before stamping, a piece of thin sheet iron, slightly narrower than the final product, was placed on the back of the brass. After the stamping, which is clearly visible on the iron, the ends of this iron were bent inward into tongues for attaching to the belt, and the rest of the back was filled with pewter. The edges of the front were then beveled to complete the product. It's very likely that plates like this were created for sale to officers.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, OFFICER, ARTILLERY CORPS, 1814-1821

USNM 60247 (S-K 5). Figure 61.

USNM 60247 (S-K 5). Figure 61.

Figure 61

Figure 61

This is a companion piece to the Artillery Corps waist-belt plate described above. It was struck in brass from the die of the 1814 Artillery Corps cap plate, type I, again with a thin sheet of iron applied to the reverse before the strike. There is no pewter filling; the beveled edges of the piece together with the adhesive effect of the strike—which shows through very clearly—holds on the back. The plate is fitted with two simple bent-wire fasteners for attachment, indicating that it was intended for ornamental use only. Like its waist-belt plate counterpart, this specimen must be considered an officer's device.

This is a companion piece to the Artillery Corps waist-belt plate described above. It was made from brass using the die of the 1814 Artillery Corps cap plate, type I, with a thin layer of iron attached to the back before it was struck. There is no pewter filling; the beveled edges of the piece, along with the adhesive effect of the strike—which is very visible—secure it on the back. The plate has two simple bent-wire fasteners for attachment, indicating that it was meant for decorative use only. Like its waist-belt plate counterpart, this piece should be regarded as an officer's device.

(p. 35) SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, INFANTRY, 1814-1821

USNM 60248-M (S-K 6). Figure 62.

USNM 60248-M (S-K 6). Figure 62.

Figure 62

Figure 62

This specimen is of the same design as the 1814 Infantry cap plate, type I (p. 15). It is oval, with raised edge. Within the oval is an eagle with an olive branch in its beak, three arrows in its right talon, and thunder bolts and lightning in its left talon. Below is a trophy of stacked muskets, drum, flag, and shield. The plate is silver on copper, with sheet-iron backing and bent-wire fasteners. As in the case of the Artillery Corps plate, just preceding, this must be considered an officer's plate. A similar oval plate bearing the design of the 1812 dragoon cap plate, and of similar construction, is known.

This item is designed like the 1814 Infantry cap plate, type I (p. 15). It has an oval shape with a raised edge. Inside the oval is an eagle holding an olive branch in its beak, three arrows in its right foot, and thunderbolts in its left foot. Below the eagle is a trophy made up of stacked muskets, a drum, a flag, and a shield. The plate is silver on copper, with a sheet-iron backing and bent-wire fasteners. Like the previously mentioned Artillery Corps plate, this should be regarded as an officer's plate. A similar oval plate featuring the design of the 1812 dragoon cap plate, and made in a similar way, is also known.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, 1814

USNM 66478-M. Figures 63, 64.

USNM 66478-M. Figures 63, 64.

Figure 63

Figure 63

Figure 64

Figure 64

Excavated on the site of Smith's Cantonment at Sackets Harbor, New York, this plate is interesting in that it differs in both construction and method of attachment from similar plates of the same period in the national collections. Rather than being struck in thin brass with a backing and fasteners applied to the reverse, this specimen is cast in brass and the edges rather unevenly beveled, with two studs and a narrow tongue for attachment cast integrally with the plate and with hexagonal heads forced over the ends of the studs. This means of attachment, which indicates that the plate was intended to be utilitarian as well as merely ornamental, is similar to that on British plates of the period between the Revolution and the War of 1812. The plate could have been worn by either infantry or artillery, for both were issued brass plates during this period,[87] however, it is more probable that it was worn by the infantry, since the majority of the artillery in the Sackets Harbor area were stationed nearby at either Fort Pike or Fort Tomkins.

Excavated at Smith's Cantonment in Sackets Harbor, New York, this plate is notable because it differs in both design and attachment method from similar plates from the same era found in national collections. Instead of being made from thin brass with a backing and fasteners on the back, this piece is cast in brass with unevenly beveled edges, featuring two studs and a narrow tongue for attachment that are cast together with the plate, and hexagonal heads pressed over the ends of the studs. This attachment method suggests that the plate was meant to be functional as well as decorative, similar to British plates from the period between the Revolution and the War of 1812. The plate could have been worn by either infantry or artillery, as both groups were issued brass plates during this time,[87] but it is more likely that it was worn by the infantry, since most of the artillery stationed in the Sackets Harbor area were nearby at either Fort Pike or Fort Tomkins.

(p. 36) SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1812

USNM 604311 (S-K 467). Figure 65.

USNM 604311 (S-K 467). Figure 65.

Figure 65

Figure 65

The plain, oval, slightly convex plate of brass has a raised edge. The face is lapped over a piece of sheet-iron backing. On the reverse is soldered an early form of bent-wire fasteners. British shoulder-belt plates of the Revolutionary period normally had fasteners cast as integral parts of the plate proper.

The flat, oval, slightly curved brass plate has a raised edge. The front is layered over a sheet of iron backing. On the back, there's an early type of bent-wire fasteners soldered on. British shoulder-belt plates from the Revolutionary period typically had fasteners that were cast as a part of the plate itself.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1812

USNM 604312 (S-K 468). Not illustrated.

USNM 604312 (S-K 468). Not illustrated.

This plate is identical to the one described immediately above except that it is struck in copper and the surface is silvered.

This plate is the same as the one mentioned right above but is made of copper and has a silvered surface.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1812

USNM 604314 (S-K 470). Not illustrated.

USNM 604314 (S-K 470). Not illustrated.

This plate, struck from solid brass, has a slightly beveled edge and bent-wire fasteners. It is slightly convex. Since it is smaller than the two preceding plates, it could have been designed for the Militia.

This plate, made from solid brass, has a slightly beveled edge and wire fasteners. It is slightly curved. Since it's smaller than the two previous plates, it might have been intended for the Militia.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, 1815(?)-1821

USNM 60399-M (S-K 155). Figure 66.

USNM 60399-M (S-K 155). Figure 66.

Figure 66

Figure 66

The two specimens of this plate in the national collections are undocumented. Similar in size and construction to the plain oval brass and silvered plates, it has the raised letters "U.S.," three-fourths inch high in the center. Definitely not later than 1832, it may well have been issued soon after the end of the War of 1812. It is considered a Regular Army item since the Militia did not use the designation "U.S." at this early period. In this latter connection it is interesting to note that an example of the 1812 Infantry cap plate, type II, with the letters "US" crudely stamped out, is known attached to a cap of distinct Militia origin.

The two examples of this plate in the national collections are undocumented. Similar in size and design to the plain oval brass and silver plates, it features the raised letters "USA," three-fourths of an inch high in the center. Definitely not later than 1832, it may have been released shortly after the end of the War of 1812. It's considered a Regular Army item since the Militia did not use the designation "USA" during this early period. In this regard, it's interesting to note that there is an example of the 1812 Infantry cap plate, type II, with the letters "USA" poorly stamped out, known to be attached to a cap of distinct Militia origin.

(p. 37) WAIST-BELT PLATE, GENERAL OFFICER, C. 1816

USNM 38212. Figure 67.

USNM 38212. Fig. 67.

Figure 67

Figure 67

After the War of 1812, the State of New York presented swords to several prominent officers of the Army and Navy who had distinguished themselves in actions within New York or near its borders. One of these swords (USNM 10294)[88] and an unusually fine gold embroidered belt (USNM 33097) with this gold belt buckle were presented to Maj. Gen. Jacob Brown.

After the War of 1812, the State of New York awarded swords to several prominent officers of the Army and Navy who had excelled in actions within New York or nearby. One of these swords (USNM 10294)[88] and a beautifully crafted gold embroidered belt (USNM 33097) featuring this gold belt buckle were given to Maj. Gen. Jacob Brown.

Chased in very fine gold, the buckle is considered by experts in the goldsmithing and silversmithing fields to be one of the outstanding pieces of American craftsmanship of its kind.[89] The central motif is the New York State eagle-on-half-globe device on a wreath of the colors. The head of the eagle is very similar to that on the cap plates of the 1807 Marine Corps, 1812 infantry, and 1814 Artillery Corps. The border is of a rose pattern distinctly American in feeling, and in each corner within the border are (p. 38) acanthus leaves in unusually delicate Viennese baroque design.

Chased in fine gold, experts in goldsmithing and silversmithing consider the buckle to be one of the standout pieces of American craftsmanship of its kind.[89] The central motif features the New York State eagle-on-half-globe design on a colored wreath. The eagle's head closely resembles that on the cap plates of the 1807 Marine Corps, 1812 infantry, and 1814 Artillery Corps. The border features a distinctly American rose pattern, and in each corner within the border are (p. 38) acanthus leaves in a uniquely delicate Viennese baroque style.

The maker of this buckle is unknown, but since it is reasonably certain that the hilt of the sword was designed by Moritz Furst (see p. 12), it is possible that the design of the buckle is his also, especially in view of the Viennese touch in the acanthus leaves, his training at the mint in Vienna, and the probability that he designed the 1812 infantry cap plate.

The creator of this buckle is unknown, but since it’s fairly certain that Moritz Furst designed the sword's hilt (see p. 12), it’s possible that he also designed the buckle, especially considering the Viennese style in the acanthus leaves, his training at the mint in Vienna, and the likelihood that he designed the 1812 infantry cap plate.

¶ Although the 1821 regulations were very specific about the prohibition of nonregulation items of uniform and equipment, they were somewhat vague regarding specifications. General staff and engineer officers were to wear black belts with a "yellow plate," artillery "yellow oval plates ... with an eagle in the center," and infantry the same but "white" instead of yellow.[90] No oval plates meeting these vague descriptions are known, but the specimens described below may well have been those actually approved by the Ordnance Department, and thus, worn.

¶ Although the 1821 regulations clearly prohibited nonstandard items of uniform and equipment, they were a bit unclear about the specifications. General staff and engineer officers were supposed to wear black belts with a "yellow plate," artillery had "yellow oval plates... with an eagle in the center," and infantry had the same but "white" instead of yellow.[90] No oval plates that fit these vague descriptions are known, but the examples described below might have been the ones actually approved by the Ordnance Department, and therefore, worn.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, INFANTRY OFFICER, C. 1822

USNM 604118-M (S-K 274). Figure 68.

USNM 604118-M (S-K 274). Figure 68.

Figure 68

Figure 68

This plate, struck in copper and silvered, is round with an outer ring. It is attached to a white buff belt. The plate proper contains an eagle with wings outspread, shield on breast, olive branch in right talon, and three arrows in left talon. The whole is within a ring of 24 5-pointed stars. The outer ring is decorated as a wreath, and the narrow rectangular belt attachments are embossed with a floral pattern. The 24 stars place this specimen between 1822 and 1836. Similar buckles are known in yellow metal for either staff or artillery and containing 24, 26, and 28 stars, indicating that they probably were worn until the rectangular eagle-wreath plate was prescribed in 1851.

This plate, made of copper and silvered, is round with an outer ring. It’s attached to a white belt made of buff leather. The main part of the plate features an eagle with its wings spread, a shield on its chest, an olive branch in its right talon, and three arrows in its left talon. The entire design is surrounded by a ring of 24 five-pointed stars. The outer ring is designed like a wreath, and the narrow rectangular attachments for the belt are embossed with a floral pattern. The 24 stars suggest this piece is from between 1822 and 1836. Similar buckles in yellow metal for either staff or artillery also have 24, 26, and 28 stars, indicating they likely remained in use until the rectangular eagle-wreath plate was mandated in 1851.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, INFANTRY OFFICER, 1821-1835

USNM 60454 (S-K 210). Figure 69.

USNM 60454 (S-K 210). Figure 69.

Figure 69

Figure 69

This specimen is offered as another possibility for the 1821 regulation plate. It is identical in size and similar in design to the preceding plate. The plate proper contains an eagle with wings spread, a breast shield containing the letter "I," an olive branch in right talon, and three arrows in left talon. There is no outer ring of stars. The outer ring of the buckle is decorated with a wreath, but the rectangular belt attachments are plain. The 1821 regulations called for eagle buttons of "yellow" and "white" metal with the letters "A" and "I" (for artillery and infantry) on the eagle's shield, and the belt plate may have been designed to conform. There is also the possibility that this plate, as well as the one described below, was designed to conform to the 1835 regulations which prescribed a waist belt with a "round" clasp.[91]

This item is presented as another option for the 1821 regulation plate. It is the same size and similar in design to the previous plate. The main plate features an eagle with wings spread, a breast shield displaying the letter "I," an olive branch in its right talon, and three arrows in its left talon. There is no outer ring of stars. The outer ring of the buckle is adorned with a wreath, but the rectangular belt attachments are plain. The 1821 regulations specified eagle buttons made of "yellow" and "white" metal with the letters "A" and "I" (for artillery and infantry) on the eagle's shield, indicating that the belt plate may have been designed to match these standards. It's also possible that this plate, along with the one described below, was intended to comply with the 1835 regulations that required a waist belt with a "round" clasp.[91]

(p. 39) WAIST-BELT PLATE, ARTILLERY OFFICER, 1821-1835

USNM 60455-M (S-K 211). Not illustrated.

USNM 60455-M (S-K 211). Not illustrated.

Nearly identical to the infantry officer's plate above, this buckle, in brass, has the artillery "A" on the eagle's breast shield.

Nearly identical to the infantry officer's plate above, this buckle, made of brass, features the artillery "A" on the eagle's breast shield.

¶ Although the regulations for this period do not mention shoulder-belt plates for enlisted men (officers had none as they wore their swords on their waist belts), it can be assumed that they were worn. The two specimens described below must be dated later than 1812-1821 because of the belt attachments. The earlier specimens had rudimentary bent-wire fasteners, but these, more refined, have two round studs and a hook soldered to the plate proper.

¶ Although the rules for this time don’t mention shoulder-belt plates for enlisted men (officers didn’t have any since they wore their swords on their waist belts), it’s reasonable to assume that they were used. The two items described below must be dated later than 1812-1821 because of the belt attachments. The earlier versions had basic bent-wire fasteners, but these more advanced ones have two round studs and a hook attached to the plate itself.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, INFANTRY, C. 1821

USNM 604316 (S-K 472). Figures 70, 71.

USNM 604316 (S-K 472). Figures 70, 71.

Figure 70

Figure 70

Figure 71

Figure 71

This plate, of silver on copper, is plain oval and slightly convex.

This plate, made of silver over copper, has a simple oval shape and is slightly curved.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, ARTILLERY, C. 1821

USNM 604315 (S-K 471). Not illustrated.

USNM 604315 (S-K 471). Not illustrated.

This specimen is identical to the preceding one except that it is in plain brass.

This sample is the same as the previous one, except that it’s made of plain brass.

¶ The 1832 uniform regulations brought some well-defined changes. General and staff officers were to wear gilt waist-belt plates "having the letters U S and a sprig of laurel on each side in silver," and the bottom of the skirts of officers' coats were to bear distinctive devices—a gold-embroidered star for general officers and officers of the general staff, a shell and flame in gold embroidery for artillery officers, and silver-embroidered bugles for infantry officers.

¶ The 1832 uniform regulations introduced some clear changes. General and staff officers were required to wear gilt waist-belt plates featuring the letters U.S. and a sprig of laurel on each side in silver. Additionally, the bottom of the skirts of officers' coats were to display distinctive designs—a gold-embroidered star for general officers and officers of the general staff, a shell and flame in gold embroidery for artillery officers, and silver-embroidered bugles for infantry officers.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, GENERAL AND STAFF OFFICERS, 1832

USNM 664. Figure 72.

USNM 664. Fig. 72.

Figure 72

Figure 72

The plate and the belt to which it is attached formerly belonged to Capt. Charles O. Collins, an 1824 graduate of the Military Academy. The belt is of patent leather, as specified for undress wear, and is 1-1/2 inches wide. The plate is cast in brass and has raised edges. Rather than having "a sprig of laurel on each side," it has a wreath of laurel enclosing the letters "U S," in Old English, in silvered metal (p. 40) affixed to the front. It is attached on the right side by a rectangular belt attachment with a flat hook on the left rear.

The plate and the belt it's attached to used to belong to Capt. Charles O. Collins, who graduated from the Military Academy in 1824. The belt is made of patent leather, as required for informal wear, and is 1.5 inches wide. The plate is cast in brass and features raised edges. Instead of having "a sprig of laurel on each side," it has a laurel wreath surrounding the letters "U.S.," in Old English, made of silvered metal (p. 40) secured to the front. It attaches on the right side with a rectangular belt attachment that has a flat hook on the left rear.

¶ The 1832 regulations specified for engineer officers a waist-belt plate to be "gilt, elliptical, two inches in the shortest diameter, bearing the device of the button." Such a plate (fig. 73) is in the collections of the Valley Forge Chapel Museum. It is entirely possible that this plate is even earlier than 1832, for the 1821 and 1825 regulations state that the engineer buttons were to contain "the device and motto heretofore established."

¶ The 1832 regulations required engineer officers to have a waist-belt plate that was "gold-plated, elliptical, two inches in the shortest diameter, featuring the design of the button." Such a plate (fig. 73) is part of the collections at the Valley Forge Chapel Museum. It's quite possible that this plate dates back to before 1832, as the 1821 and 1825 regulations indicate that the engineer buttons were to feature "the design and motto previously established."

Figure 73

Figure 73

In the collections of the West Point Museum is a button, carrying the "Essayons" device, that was excavated in the area behind the "Long Barracks," which burned in 1825. Another such button excavated at Sackets Harbor on the site of an 1812-1815 barracks bears a maker's name (Wishart) of the 1812-1816 period.

In the West Point Museum, there’s a button featuring the "Essayons" symbol that was dug up in the area behind the "Long Barracks," which was destroyed by fire in 1825. Another similar button found at Sackets Harbor on the site of a barracks from 1812-1815 has a maker's name (Wishart) from the 1812-1816 period.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, GENERAL AND STAFF OFFICERS, 1832(?)-1850

USNM 604145-M (S-K 301). Figure 74.

USNM 604145-M (S-K 301). Figure 74.

Figure 74.—Specimen in Valley Forge Chapel Museum, Valley Forge, Pennsylvania.

Figure 74.—Item in Valley Forge Chapel Museum, Valley Forge, Pennsylvania.

This buckle is similar to the one (shown in fig. 73) that belonged to Capt. Charles O. Collins, but it is different in that the letters "U.S." are enclosed not by a laurel wreath but by a sprig of laurel on the right side and a sprig of palm on the left. The 1841 uniform regulations specified such a belt plate for officers of the Corps of Engineers, but with a "turreted castle, raised in silver" rather than the letters "U.S." This places the probable date of manufacture of this specimen in the 1840's.

This buckle is similar to the one (shown in fig. 73) that belonged to Capt. Charles O. Collins, but it's different because the letters "USA" are surrounded by a sprig of laurel on the right and a sprig of palm on the left instead of being enclosed by a laurel wreath. The 1841 uniform regulations specified this kind of belt plate for officers of the Corps of Engineers, but it featured a "turreted castle, raised in silver" instead of the letters "USA" This suggests that the likely date of manufacture for this buckle is in the 1840s.

COAT-SKIRT ORNAMENT, GENERAL STAFF, 1832

USNM 8040. Figure 75.

USNM 8040. Fig. 75.

Figure 75

Figure 75

This skirt ornament, on buff cloth, is from a coat worn by Capt. Thomas Swords when he was assistant quartermaster general in 1838. The design consists of three 6-pointed stars of gold bullion cord: a line (p. 41) star of twisted cord superimposed upon a larger star of closely stitched cord that in turn is superimposed upon a still larger star of sunburst type.

This skirt decoration, on light-colored fabric, is from a coat worn by Capt. Thomas Swords when he served as assistant quartermaster general in 1838. The design features three 6-pointed stars made of gold bullion cord: a smaller star of twisted cord placed on top of a larger star made of closely stitched cord, which is in turn placed on top of an even larger sunburst-style star. (p. 41)

COAT-SKIRT ORNAMENT, GENERAL STAFF, 1832

USNM 62057-M (S-K 181). Figure 76.

USNM 62057-M (S-K 181). Figure 76.

Figure 76

Figure 76

Like the preceding specimen, this ornament, on buff cloth, is comprised of three stars. A star made of lines of sequins secured by two strands of twisted bullion is superimposed upon a 6-pointed star of gold embroidery that in turn is superimposed upon a 6-pointed star made up of gold sequins secured by gold bullion cord.

Like the previous example, this decoration on beige fabric features three stars. A star made of sequin lines secured by two twisted bullion strands is layered over a 6-pointed star of gold embroidery, which is also layered over another 6-pointed star made of gold sequins held in place by a gold bullion cord.

COAT-SKIRT ORNAMENT, ARTILLERY OFFICER, 1832

USNM 15929. Figure 77.

USNM 15929. Fig. 77.

Figure 77

Figure 77

This specimen, on red cloth, is on a coat worn by William Tecumseh Sherman when he was a lieutenant in the 3d Artillery. The bomb is made of whorls of gold bullion cord, while the flames are composed of curving lines of twisted bullion. The lowest flame on either side terminates in arrow heads.

This piece, on red fabric, is from a coat worn by William Tecumseh Sherman when he was a lieutenant in the 3rd Artillery. The bomb is made of loops of gold thread, while the flames consist of curving lines of twisted bullion. The lowest flame on each side ends in arrowheads.

There are a number of gold-embroidered shell and flame devices in the national collections, all varying considerably in size and composition. Some are skirt ornaments for artillery officers, both Regular Army and Militia, while some are cap ornaments for ordnance officers. Indeed, two coats formerly belonging to Maj. Levi Twiggs, U.S. Marine Corps, carry the same device.

There are several gold-embroidered shell and flame decorations in the national collections, all differing significantly in size and materials. Some are skirt ornaments for artillery officers, both in the Regular Army and the Militia, while others are cap ornaments for ordnance officers. In fact, two coats that used to belong to Maj. Levi Twiggs of the U.S. Marine Corps feature the same design.

COAT-SKIRT ORNAMENT, INFANTRY OFFICER, 1832

USNM 59861-M. Figure 78.

USNM 59861-M. Fig. 78.

Figure 78

Figure 78

The silver coat-skirt horn ornaments of infantry officers varied almost as much as the shell and flame devices, generally in relation to the affluence of the individual concerned. Unlike such ornaments of the other services, the horns were paired in rights and lefts on the coat.

The silver coat-skirt horn ornaments of infantry officers varied almost as much as the shell and flame designs, usually depending on the wealth of the individual officer. Unlike the ornaments of other services, the horns were displayed in pairs for the right and left sides of the coat.

This specimen, of silver bullion cord, is on a coat that once belonged to Lt. William Williams Mather, an 1828 graduate of the Military Academy who left the service in 1836. The horn is looped, and it is suspended by twisted bullion from a simple 3-leaf-clover knot. The whole is backed on blue cloth.

This piece, made of silver bullion cord, is from a coat that used to belong to Lt. William Williams Mather, who graduated from the Military Academy in 1828 and left the service in 1836. The horn is looped and hangs by twisted bullion from a straightforward 3-leaf clover knot. The entire piece is backed with blue cloth.

(p. 42) COAT-SKIRT ORNAMENT, INFANTRY OFFICER, 1832

USNM 1056. Figure 79.

USNM 1056. Fig. 79.

Figure 79

Figure 79

This rather elaborate specimen is on a coat worn by John Porter Hatch when he was a lieutenant of infantry in 1845. The body of the horn—which is merely curved rather than looped—is made of silver lamé encircled by three ornamented bands of bullion. The mouthpiece and bell are of bullion. The whole is suspended by a rather ornate 3-leaf-clover knot of bands of edged bullion and is backed on blue cloth.

This detailed item is from a coat worn by John Porter Hatch when he was a lieutenant in the infantry in 1845. The body of the horn—which is curved instead of looped—is crafted from silver lamé and decorated with three bands of ornate bullion. The mouthpiece and bell are also made of bullion. The entire piece is hung from a fancy 3-leaf-clover knot made of edged bullion bands and is set against blue cloth.

COAT-SKIRT ORNAMENT, CORPS OF TOPOGRAPHICAL ENGINEERS, 1839(?)

USNM 22702. Figure 80.

USNM 22702. Fig. 80.

Figure 80

Figure 80

The uniform regulations for the period 1832-1846 carry no mention of coat-skirt ornaments for the Corps of Topographical Engineers, rather only prescribing the "slashed skirt flaps to be embroidered in gold, with oak leaves and acorns" like the collar and cuffs. There is in the national collections, however, a uniform for the Corps that corresponds with 1839 regulations in every way except that the coat skirts carry this ornament—a shield within a wreath of oak leaves—of gold embroidery. The device appears to be of the same vintage as the other embroidery on the coat.

The uniform regulations for the period 1832-1846 don’t mention coat-skirt decorations for the Corps of Topographical Engineers, only stating that "slashed skirt flaps should be embroidered in gold, with oak leaves and acorns," similar to the collar and cuffs. However, in the national collections, there is a uniform for the Corps that follows the 1839 regulations in every detail except that the coat skirts feature this decoration—a gold embroidered shield within a wreath of oak leaves. The design seems to date back to the same time as the other embroidery on the coat.

¶ Although the 1832 uniform regulations make no mention of swords for noncommissioned officers, in 1833 the Ames Manufacturing Company of Chicopee, Massachusetts, began the manufacture of a new sword for the Regular artillery. Based on a European pattern, this weapon was the popular conception of the short Roman stabbing sword, or gladius. In 1834 this weapon was also authorized for infantry noncommissioned officers.[92]

¶ Although the 1832 uniform regulations don't mention swords for noncommissioned officers, in 1833 the Ames Manufacturing Company of Chicopee, Massachusetts, started producing a new sword for the Regular artillery. Based on a European design, this weapon was the widely accepted version of the short Roman stabbing sword, or gladius. In 1834, this weapon was also approved for infantry noncommissioned officers.[92]

(p. 43) WAIST-BELT PLATE, ARTILLERY NONCOMMISSIONED OFFICER, 1833

USNM 654384 (S-K 531). Figure 81.

USNM 654384 (S-K 531). Figure 81.

Figure 81

Figure 81

This is the belt-plate assembly designed for carrying the short "Roman pattern" NCO sword. The plate is of two round pieces joined by an S-hook that is open on one end for unbuckling. Each round piece has a flat loop for attachment to the white buff belt. The right-hand round piece has an eagle with head to the left, wings drooping, three arrows in the right talon, and an olive branch in the left talon. The left-hand piece has crossed cannons and the letters "U.S." The whole is cast in rough bronze.

This is the belt-plate assembly made for carrying the short "Roman pattern" NCO sword. The plate consists of two round pieces connected by an S-hook that opens on one end for unbuckling. Each round piece has a flat loop for attaching to the white buff belt. The right round piece features an eagle facing left, with drooping wings, holding three arrows in its right talon and an olive branch in its left talon. The left piece has crossed cannons and the letters "USA" The entire assembly is cast in rough bronze.

Assemblies of this type were popularly known as "Dingee" belts, because one of the primary contractors for them was Robert Dingee of New York City. The eagle on this plate is very similar to the one on Dingee's contract rifle flasks of 1832.[93]

Assemblies like this were commonly called "Dingee" belts because one of the main contractors was Robert Dingee from New York City. The eagle on this plate looks a lot like the one on Dingee's contract rifle flasks from 1832.[93]

WAIST-BELT PLATE, INFANTRY NONCOMMISSIONED OFFICER, 1834

USNM 604111 (S-K 267). Figure 82.

USNM 604111 (S-K 267). Figure 82.

Figure 82

Figure 82

This plate and belt are identical to the artillery specimen above except that the left-hand round portion exhibits three stacked muskets and a drum instead of crossed cannon.

This plate and belt are the same as the artillery example above, except that the left side of the round part shows three stacked muskets and a drum instead of crossed cannons.

Figure 83.—Specimen in collection of William E. Codd, Towson, Maryland.

Figure 83.—Item in the collection of William E. Codd, Towson, Maryland.

¶ NCO belt plates similar to the two above also appeared in what might be called a staff or branch immaterial pattern, with the crossed cannon and/or stacked muskets and drum replaced by the letters "US" alone (fig. 83). This pattern apparently was intended for wear by NCO's other than those assigned to the infantry, artillery, or dragoons.

¶ NCO belt plates like the two above also showed up in what could be called a staff or branch neutral pattern, with the crossed cannons and/or stacked muskets and drum being replaced by the letters "USA" alone (fig. 83). This pattern seems to have been meant for NCOs not assigned to the infantry, artillery, or dragoons.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, DRAGOON OFFICER, 1833

USNM 5664. Figure 84.

USNM 5664. Fig. 84.

Figure 84

Figure 84

This plate, which formerly belonged to Gen. William S. Harney when he commanded the 2d Dragoons in 1836, is identical to the general and staff officers' plate of the 1832 regulations except that the letters "U.S." have been replaced by the letter "D" in Old English, as prescribed.[94]

This plate, which used to belong to Gen. William S. Harney when he was in charge of the 2nd Dragoons in 1836, is just like the plate for generals and staff officers from the 1832 regulations, except that the letters "USA" have been swapped out for the letter "D" in Old English, as required.[94]

(p. 44) WAIST-BELT PLATE, NONCOMMISSIONED OFFICER, 1836

USNM 604114-M (S-K 268). Figure 85.

USNM 604114-M (S-K 268). Figure 85.

Figure 85

Figure 85

The 1835 uniform regulations replaced the rather impractical S-hook NCO belt plate with a "round clasp" on which the branch designation was replaced with the raised letters "U S." Similar in over-all design to the 1821 officers' plate, round with outer ring, these plates were rough cast in brass and had a stippled surface.

The 1835 uniform regulations replaced the impractical S-hook NCO belt plate with a "round clasp," where the branch designation was changed to the raised letters "U.S." Similar in overall design to the 1821 officers' plate, which was round with an outer ring, these plates were roughly cast in brass and featured a stippled surface.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, NONCOMMISSIONED OFFICER, 1836

USNM 604114 (S-K 270). Not illustrated.

USNM 604114 (S-K 270). Not illustrated.

This specimen is very similar to the preceding plate, but it is of a definitely different casting and is generally heavier in over-all appearance, the inner ring is much more convex, and the letters "U S" are raised only slightly and spread farther apart.

This sample is very similar to the previous plate, but it has a distinctly different shape and looks generally heavier overall. The inner ring is much more curved, and the letters "U.S." are only slightly raised and are spaced farther apart.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, OFFICERS, 1839

USNM 40886. Figure 86.

USNM 40886. Fig. 86.

Figure 86

Figure 86

The 1839 uniform regulations specified a shoulder belt (rather than a waist belt) for carrying the sword, with a "breast plate according to the pattern to be furnished by the Ordnance Department." This plate, which was worn by Capt. Erastus Capron, 1st Artillery, an 1833 graduate of the Military Academy, is believed to be that specified.[95] The specimen is rectangular with beveled edges, cast in brass, and has (p. 45) the lines of a modified sunburst radiating outward. In the center, within a wreath of laurel, are the letters "U S" in Old English. Both the wreath and letters are of silvered copper and are applied. The plate is attached by three broad hooks rather than two studs and a hook.

The 1839 uniform guidelines specified a shoulder belt (instead of a waist belt) for carrying the sword, along with a "breast plate according to the pattern to be provided by the Ordnance Department." This plate, worn by Capt. Erastus Capron, 1st Artillery, an 1833 graduate of the Military Academy, is believed to be the one mentioned.[95] The piece is rectangular with beveled edges, made of brass, and features the design of a modified sunburst radiating outward. In the center, surrounded by a laurel wreath, are the letters "US" in Old English. Both the wreath and letters are made of silvered copper and are attached. The plate is secured by three wide hooks instead of two studs and a hook. (p. 45)

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, OFFICERS, 1839

USNM 604330 (S-K 486). Not illustrated.

USNM 604330 (S-K 486). Not illustrated.

This plate is almost identical to the Capron specimen above except that the letters "U S," instead of being in Old English, are formed of oak leaves.

This plate is nearly identical to the Capron specimen above, except that the letters "US" are made of oak leaves instead of being in Old English.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, CORPS OF TOPOGRAPHICAL ENGINEERS, 1839

USNM 22702. Figure 87.

USNM 22702. Fig. 87.

Figure 87

Figure 87

The 1839 uniform regulations prescribed this plate for the Corps of Topographical Engineers. The oval inner plate, which contains the prescribed eagle, shield, and the letters "U S" in Old English, is struck in medium weight copper and gilded. This inner plate is soldered to a cast-bronze and gilded tongue which in turn is brazed to a cast-bronze belt attachment. The oval outer ring, bearing the prescribed "CORPS OF TOPOGRAPHICAL ENGINEERS" in Roman capitals, is cast in brass and gilded. To the inner edge of this outer ring are brazed two curved seats for the inner oval. The whole is brazed to the belt attachment, also cast in brass and gilded.

The 1839 uniform regulations specified this plate for the Corps of Topographical Engineers. The oval inner plate features the required eagle, shield, and the letters "US" in Old English, made from medium weight copper and gilded. This inner plate is soldered to a cast-bronze and gilded tongue, which is then brazed to a cast-bronze belt attachment. The oval outer ring, displaying the required "Topographical Engineers Corps" in Roman capitals, is cast in brass and gilded. Two curved seats for the inner oval are brazed to the inner edge of this outer ring. The entire piece is brazed to the belt attachment, which is also cast in brass and gilded.

¶ In view of the large and somewhat elaborate cap plates as well as shoulder-belt plates adopted by both the Regulars and Militia early in the 19th century, it is somewhat surprising that apparently neither component had ornamentation on its cartridge boxes until the Ordnance Regulations of 1834 prescribed a very ornate design embossed on the leather flap.[96] Certainly there was precedent for such, for both the British and German mercenary troops of the Revolution and the British and Canadian troops of the War of 1812 wore metal ornaments on their cartridge boxes. At least partial explanation for this omission may lie in one of Callender Irvine's reasons for rejecting brass cartridge boxes in favor of leather ones: "The leather ... affords no mark for the enemy to sight at. The brass ... would afford a central object, as regards the body of the Soldier, and one which would be seen at a great distance to fire at."[97] Why Irvine did not object equally to the large white and yellow metal cap and shoulder-belt plates as targets is unknown. In any case—with a possible few Militia exceptions such as a Militia cartridge box with a plate bearing the likeness of Washington in silver, both about 1835—the 1839 model oval plates were the first to be worn.

¶ Considering the large and somewhat detailed cap plates and shoulder-belt plates used by both the Regulars and Militia early in the 19th century, it's a bit surprising that neither group had any decoration on their cartridge boxes until the Ordnance Regulations of 1834 specified a very ornate design embossed on the leather flap.[96] There was certainly a precedent for this, as both British and German mercenary troops from the Revolution and the British and Canadian troops from the War of 1812 wore metal ornaments on their cartridge boxes. One possible reason for this omission may be linked to Callender Irvine's rejection of brass cartridge boxes in favor of leather ones: "The leather ... provides no mark for the enemy to aim at. The brass ... would create a central target on the Soldier's body, one that could be seen from a long distance to shoot at."[97] Why Irvine didn't raise the same concern about the large white and yellow metal cap and shoulder-belt plates as targets remains unclear. In any case—with a few possible exceptions among the Militia, like a Militia cartridge box featuring a silver plate with Washington's likeness around 1835—the 1839 model oval plates were the first to be used.

The ordnance regulations of 1839 and the ordnance manual of 1841 brought in two distinctly new types of plates, the familiar brass oval waist-belt and cartridge-box plates with the letters "U. S." and the round shoulder-belt plate with the eagle. The oval plates fall into two general sizes, 3.5 inches by 2.2 inches (for plates on the infantry's cartridge box and the cavalry's waist belts)[98] and 2.8 inches by 1.6 inches (for plates on the infantry's waist belts and the cavalry's carbine cartridge boxes and pistol cartridge boxes). The use of each plate is determined by the type of fastener. These plates were struck in thin brass and the backs generally leaded, although some were used without such backing, probably to save both weight and material. Cartridge boxes were also embossed with the outline of this oval plate in lieu of the plate itself. It is interesting to note that the larger plates with lead backs weighed about 5-1/2 ounces and the smaller ones just over 2 ounces.

The ordnance regulations of 1839 and the ordnance manual of 1841 introduced two new types of plates: the well-known brass oval waist-belt and cartridge-box plates featuring the letters "USA" and the round shoulder-belt plate with the eagle design. The oval plates come in two general sizes: 3.5 inches by 2.2 inches (for the infantry's cartridge box and the cavalry's waist belts)[98] and 2.8 inches by 1.6 inches (for the infantry's waist belts and the cavalry's carbine and pistol cartridge boxes). The type of fastener determines the use of each plate. These plates were made from thin brass with leaded backs, although some were used without the backing to save weight and material. Cartridge boxes were also embossed with the shape of this oval plate instead of having the plate itself. It's noteworthy that the larger plates with lead backs weighed about 5.5 ounces, while the smaller ones weighed just over 2 ounces.

(p. 46) WAIST-BELT PLATE, CAVALRY, 1839

USNM 604408 (S-K 555). Figures 88, 89.

USNM 604408 (S-K 555). Figures 88, 89.

Figure 88

Figure 88

Figure 89

Figure 89

The specimen is oval, slightly convex, and struck in thin brass. The face has a raised edge and the letters "U S." The reverse is leaded, carries two studs and a hook (indicating its use), and is stamped with the maker's name, "W. H. Smith, Brooklyn." Smith is listed in New York City directories of the Civil War period as a contractor for metal and leather supplies.

The item is oval, slightly curved, and made of thin brass. The front has a raised edge and the letters "U.S." The back is leaded, has two studs and a hook (showing how it was used), and is stamped with the maker's name, "W. H. Smith, Brooklyn." Smith is listed in New York City directories from the Civil War era as a contractor for metal and leather supplies.

CARTRIDGE-BOX PLATE, INFANTRY, 1839

USNM 604403 (S-K 550). Figure 90.

USNM 604403 (S-K 550). Figure 90.

Figure 90

Figure 90

This plate is identical to the preceding one except that it is leaded and fitted with two looped-wire fasteners. The reverse is stamped with the name of the maker, "J. L. Pittman," who, like Smith, was a contractor in the New York City area in the Civil War period.

This plate is the same as the previous one, except it has lead and two looped-wire fasteners. The back is stamped with the maker's name, "J. L. Pittman," who, like Smith, was a contractor in the New York City area during the Civil War.

CARTRIDGE-BOX PLATE, CAVALRY, 1839

USNM 604395 (S-K 542). Not illustrated.

USNM 604395 (S-K 542). Not illustrated.

This is the oval "US" plate of the smaller size (2-3/4 by 1-1/8 in.), otherwise identical to the larger plate. It is fitted with two looped-wire fasteners.

This is the oval "USA" plate in the smaller size (2-3/4 by 1-1/8 in.), which is otherwise the same as the larger plate. It comes with two looped-wire fasteners.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, INFANTRY, 1839

USNM 604398 (S-K 545). Figure 91.

USNM 604398 (S-K 545). Figure 91.

Figure 91

Figure 91

This specimen is identical to the preceding plate except that it is fitted with two brass hooks for attachment to the belt and the reverse is stamped with the maker's name, "Boyd & Sons." No trace of a manufacturer of such products by the name of Boyd (p. 47) has been found. It is probable that he worked during the Civil War period when there were many such contractors.

This item is the same as the previous plate, except it has two brass hooks for attaching to a belt, and the back is marked with the maker's name, "Boyd & Sons." No evidence has been found of a manufacturer with that name producing these kinds of products (p. 47). It's likely that he operated during the Civil War era when there were many contractors like him.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, INFANTRY, 1839

USNM 604399 (S-K 546). Not illustrated.

USNM 604399 (S-K 546). Not illustrated.

This plate is identical to those above except that the reverse is stamped with the maker's name. "H. A. Dingee."

This plate is the same as the ones above, except that the back is stamped with the maker's name: "H. A. Dingee."

WAIST-BELT PLATE, INFANTRY, 1839

USNM 604397 (S-K 544). Figure 92.

USNM 604397 (S-K 544). Figure 92.

Figure 92

Figure 92

The reverse side of this plate is fitted with the rather rudimentary wire fasteners similar to those on shoulder-belt plates of the 1812-1821 period. In other respects the specimen is identical to the preceding ones of 1839.

The back of this plate is equipped with basic wire fasteners like those found on shoulder-belt plates from 1812 to 1821. Otherwise, this specimen is the same as the previous ones from 1839.

¶ The 1839 regulations specified a bayonet-belt plate "round, brass, with eagle." The 1841 ordnance manual was more exact, specifying the plate to be "brass, circular, 2.5 in. diameter, with an Eagle," and then stating: "The bayonet belt is about to be discontinued ..." Although not so authorized at the time, this plate, so familiar during the Civil War period, was switched over to the shoulder belt supporting the cartridge box. Such plates were manufactured in great quantities and in many variations of the original design by a dozen or more contractors during the period 1861-1865.

¶ The 1839 regulations specified a bayonet belt plate as "round, brass, with an eagle." The 1841 ordnance manual was more specific, stating the plate should be "brass, circular, 2.5 in. in diameter, with an eagle," and then noted: "The bayonet belt is about to be discontinued..." Although it wasn't officially authorized at the time, this plate, so recognizable during the Civil War period, was transitioned to the shoulder belt that supported the cartridge box. These plates were produced in large quantities and in many variations of the original design by a dozen or more contractors between 1861 and 1865.

CARTRIDGE-BOX-BELT PLATE, 1839

USNM 60338-M (S-K 94). Figure 93.

USNM 60338-M (S-K 94). Figure 93.

Figure 93

Figure 93

This circular plate, with raised rim, is dominated by an eagle of refined design that is very similar to the eagles appearing on the War of 1812 plates. The eagle has its wings drooped, head to the left, three arrows in the right talon, and an olive branch in the left talon. This specimen can be dated with the earliest cartridge-box plates because of its backing and the type of fasteners. Whereas the backs of the later models were lead-filled, this plate was struck in thin brass over tin and the edges of the obverse crimped to retain the backing. The fasteners are of the bent-wire type typical of the 1812-1832 period and are not the "2 eyes of iron wire" called for in the ordnance manual of 1850. None of the later examples of this design evidence any of the refinement of the original. At least eight variations are represented in the national collections.

This circular plate, with a raised rim, prominently features an elegantly designed eagle that closely resembles the eagles found on the War of 1812 plates. The eagle has its wings lowered, its head turned to the left, holding three arrows in its right talon and an olive branch in its left talon. This piece can be dated alongside the earliest cartridge-box plates due to its backing and the type of fasteners used. While the backs of later models were lead-filled, this plate is made of thin brass over tin, with the edges crimped to secure the backing. The fasteners are of the bent-wire type typical of the 1812-1832 period, unlike the "2 eyes of iron wire" specified in the ordnance manual of 1850. None of the later examples of this design show the same level of refinement as the original. At least eight variations are represented in the national collections.

CARTRIDGE-BOX-BELT PLATE, 1839, DIE SAMPLE

USNM 60339-M (S-K 95). Not illustrated.

USNM 60339-M (S-K 95). Not illustrated.

This is a die sample, struck in copper, of the plate described above.

SWORD-BELT PLATE, 1851

USNM 38017. Figures 94, 95.

USNM 38017. Figs. 94, 95.

Figure 94

Figure 94

Figure 95

Figure 95

The 1851 regulations prescribed this plate for all officers and enlisted men. It was specified to be "gilt, rectangular, two inches wide, with a raised bright rim; a silver wreath of laurel encircling the 'Arms of the United States'; eagle, scroll, edge of cloud and rays bright. The motto, 'E Pluribus Unum,' in silver letters upon the scroll; stars also of silver; according to pattern."[99]

The 1851 regulations required this plate for all officers and enlisted personnel. It was described as "gold-plated, rectangular, two inches wide, with a raised shiny edge; a silver laurel wreath surrounding the 'Arms of the United States'; eagle, scroll, edge of cloud, and bright rays. The motto, 'E Pluribus Unum,' in silver letters on the scroll; stars also in silver; according to pattern."[99]

This plate has had a longer history than any other similar Army device. It was authorized for all personnel until 1881 when it was dropped as an item of enlisted equipment. It was retained for officers, first for general wear, then for dress only. It was worn with officers' dress blue uniforms until 1941, but was not revived when blues reappeared after World War II. A plate of the same general size and pattern, although gilt in its entirety, was prescribed for senior NCO's of the Marine Corps until about 1950 or 1951.

This plate has a longer history than any other similar Army item. It was authorized for all personnel until 1881 when it was removed as a piece of enlisted equipment. It was kept for officers, initially for general wear, and then just for formal occasions. Officers wore it with their dress blue uniforms until 1941, but it wasn't brought back when blues returned after World War II. A plate of the same general size and design, but entirely gold in color, was required for senior NCOs of the Marine Corps until about 1950 or 1951.

The buckle appears in many variations of design, at least 12 being represented in the national collections. (p. 48) Many of these variations are the result of the plate being produced in great numbers by many different contractors during the Civil War. The original design itself is interesting. The 1851 description called for an "edge of cloud and rays" and the official, full size drawing in Regulations for the Uniform and Dress of the Army includes the "edge of cloud" and pictures the eagle with its head to the heraldic left. At least 50 of these plates were examined by the authors, but only this specimen had the "edge of cloud," silver letters and stars, and the eagle with its head to the left. In most specimens the plate proper is bronze, in one piece, and with the wreath silvered or left plain; in a few specimens the wreath is in white metal and has been applied after casting. This particular specimen is of an early issue. It is cast in heavy brass, with the wreath applied, and has the narrow brass tongue for attachment on the reverse (fig. 95), typical of the early types.

The buckle comes in many different designs, with at least 12 variations found in national collections. (p. 48) Many of these variations resulted from the large-scale production by various contractors during the Civil War. The original design is quite fascinating. The 1851 description mentioned an "edge of cloud and rays," and the official, full-size drawing in Regulations for the Uniform and Dress of the Army includes the "edge of cloud" and shows the eagle facing the heraldic left. The authors examined at least 50 of these plates, but only this specimen featured the "edge of cloud," silver letters and stars, and the eagle facing left. In most examples, the plate is made of bronze, in a single piece, with a silvered or plain wreath; in a few cases, the wreath is made of white metal and added after casting. This specific specimen is an early issue. It is cast in heavy brass, with the wreath added, and has a narrow brass tongue for attachment on the back (fig. 95), which is typical of early types.

SWORD-BELT PLATE, 1851, DIE SAMPLE

USNM. 60342-M (S-K 98). Figure 96.

USNM. 60342-M (S-K 98). Figure 96.

Figure 96

Figure 96

This is a sample struck from a die which apparently was not approved for the 1851 pattern plate. The eagle has wings upraised (2 inches tip to tip), head to right, shield on breast, scroll with "E Pluribus Unum" in beak, three arrows in right talon, and an olive branch in left talon. Stars are intermixed with "edge of cloud" and rays.

This is a sample made from a die that seems not to have been approved for the 1851 pattern plate. The eagle has its wings raised (2 inches from tip to tip), head facing right, a shield on its chest, a scroll with "E Pluribus Unum" in its beak, three arrows in its right talon, and an olive branch in its left talon. Stars are mixed in with "edge of cloud" and rays.

The specimen leads to the interesting speculation as to the weight given to correct heraldic usage at (p. 49) this period. The significance of the clouds, or lack of them, is unknown, but it should be noted that in all but the earliest specimens the eagle's head is turned to the right, or the side of honor, and the olive branch is placed in the right talon, indicating peaceful national motives as opposed to the three arrows, signs of belligerency, in the left talon. In this respect, it is interesting to note that until 1945 the eagle on the President's seal and flag carried its head turned to the heraldic left.

The specimen raises an intriguing question about how much importance was placed on correct heraldic usage at (p. 49) during this time. The meaning of the clouds, or their absence, is unclear, but it's important to point out that in all but the earliest specimens, the eagle's head is turned to the right, which is considered the side of honor, and the olive branch is held in the right talon, symbolizing peaceful national intentions, unlike the three arrows in the left talon, which represent aggression. In this context, it's noteworthy that until 1945, the eagle on the President's seal and flag had its head turned to the heraldic left.

(p. 51) Insignia of the Uniformed Militia

Cap and Helmet Devices

HAT ORNAMENT, INDEPENDENT DRAGOONS(?), c. 1800

USNM 14978. Figure 97.

USNM 14978. Fig 97.

Figure 97

Figure 97

This silver ornament is one of the most unusual pieces of military insignia in the national collections. Obviously military, it is just as obviously of Militia origin. Although hardly artistic in design, it has a rather attractive simplicity and has been made with considerable care. The eagle is of the "frogleg" design that first appeared on buttons of the post-Revolutionary Army and, later on, of the Legion. In its right talon the eagle is grasping what appear to be rather stylized thunderbolts, and in its left, arrows. The arc above the eagle's head is comprised of sunrays, an edge of clouds, and 16 6-pointed stars. If the number of stars is of significance, the piece would date prior to November 1802 when the 17th state, Ohio, was admitted to the union. The "frog-legged" aspect of the design would tend to confirm such dating, and the thunderbolts in the right talon, symbolic of a belligerent attitude, could be attributed to the national temper during the "quasi war" with France, 1798-1800. The "ID," in delicate floriated script on the eagle's breast, quite out of consonance with the design and execution of the piece proper and obviously the work of a talented engraver, is interpreted as "Independent Dragoons." Too small for a hat frontpiece, it was probably worn as a side ornament on a dragoon helmet.

This silver ornament is one of the most unique pieces of military insignia in the national collections. Clearly military, it also originates from the Militia. While it’s not particularly artistic in design, it has a nice simplicity and was made with great care. The eagle features the "frogleg" design that first appeared on buttons of the post-Revolutionary Army and later on the Legion. In its right talon, the eagle is holding what looks like stylized thunderbolts, and in its left, arrows. The arc above the eagle's head consists of sunrays, a border of clouds, and 16 six-pointed stars. If the number of stars holds significance, this piece would date to before November 1802, when Ohio became the 17th state in the union. The "frog-legged" aspect of the design reinforces this dating, and the thunderbolts in the right talon, symbolizing a confrontational attitude, could reflect the national mood during the "quasi war" with France from 1798 to 1800. The "ID," in delicate floral script on the eagle's breast, which doesn’t match the overall design and quality of the piece and is clearly the work of a skilled engraver, is interpreted as "Independent Dragoons." Too small to be a hat frontpiece, it was likely worn as a side ornament on a dragoon helmet.

LEATHER FAN COCKADE, C. 1810

USNM 60257-M (S-K 15). Figure 98.

USNM 60257-M (S-K 15). Figure 98.

Figure 98

Figure 98

The leather fan cockade became a part of the uniform in the late 18th century, having evolved from the cloth cockade adopted early in the Revolution.[100] Enlisted men's cockades of the early 19th century were of leather, as were those of line officers.[101] This cockade, of black tooled leather (p. 52) with painted gold fan tips, was a common form of the period and was worn with an eagle in the center or possibly on the upper fan. It is assigned to the Militia because of the gold ornamentation.

The leather fan cockade became part of the uniform in the late 18th century, evolving from the cloth cockade that was adopted early in the Revolution.[100] Enlisted men's cockades in the early 19th century were made of leather, as were those of line officers.[101] This cockade, made of black tooled leather (p. 52) with painted gold fan tips, was a typical style of the time and featured an eagle in the center or possibly on the upper fan. It is attributed to the Militia because of the gold ornamentation.

CAP PLATE, C. 1810

USNM 60275-M (S-K 33). Figure 99.

USNM 60275-M (S-K 33). Figure 99.

Figure 99

Figure 99

This grenadier-type plate, which is untrimmed and thus may be a die sample, is a rare example of the use of coiled snakes as a military device after 1800. A familiar motif of the Revolution, coiled snakes were not revived as a popular military symbol during the War of 1812. This specimen is struck in brass and is believed to have been made for a specific independent Militia organization, designation unknown, for wear prior to 1812.

This grenadier-style plate, which is untrimmed and could be a die sample, is a rare instance of using coiled snakes as a military emblem after 1800. A well-known symbol from the Revolution, coiled snakes weren't brought back as a popular military symbol during the War of 1812. This piece is made of brass and is thought to have been created for a specific independent militia group, name unknown, for use before 1812.

COCKADE EAGLE, 1812-1815

USNM 60361-M (S-K 117). Figure 100.

USNM 60361-M (S-K 117). Figure 100.

Figure 100

Figure 100

The eagle-on-clouds design, which first appeared on coins on the 1795 silver dollar, was popular on insignia during the period 1812-1821. The heraldic significance of the clouds, if any, is unknown. Somewhat larger than most cockade devices, this eagle is (p. 53) struck in brass and silvered and has two simple wire fasteners soldered to the reverse. A very similar badge is shown by Rembrandt Peale in an oil portrait of Col. Joseph O. Bogart of the 3d Flying Artillery.[102]

The eagle-on-clouds design, which first appeared on coins in the 1795 silver dollar, was popular on insignias from 1812 to 1821. The heraldic meaning of the clouds, if there is one, is unclear. This eagle, slightly larger than most cockade devices, is (p. 53) made of brass and silver and features two simple wire fasteners soldered to the back. A very similar badge is depicted by Rembrandt Peale in an oil portrait of Col. Joseph O. Bogart of the 3rd Flying Artillery.[102]

COCKADE EAGLE, C. 1814

USNM 60379-M (S-K 135). Figure 101.

USNM 60379-M (S-K 135). Figure 101.

Figure 101

Figure 101

This eagle, of the general design first seen on the 1807 half-dollar, is very similar to the one on buttons ascribed to staff officers, 1814-1821.[103] The eagle, struck in brass, has wings upraised and the familiar hooked beak; it stands on a wreath of the colors. The wire fasteners on the reverse are of a somewhat unusual type and may not be contemporary.

This eagle, based on the design first seen on the 1807 half-dollar, is quite similar to the one on buttons associated with staff officers from 1814-1821.[103] The eagle, made of brass, has its wings raised and features the recognizable hooked beak; it stands on a wreath of colors. The wire fasteners on the back are of a somewhat unusual type and may not be from the same time period.

¶ Die work for cap, shoulder-belt, and waist-belt plates was expensive, and many Militia organizations found it expedient to purchase devices "ready made" from existing dies. By varying the trimming and adding borders of various designs, the same dies could be used to strike all three types of plates. Such badges are called "common" plates.

¶ The work for cap, shoulder-belt, and waist-belt plates was costly, and many militia groups decided it was more practical to buy "ready-made" items from existing dies. By changing the trimming and adding different border designs, the same dies could be used to create all three types of plates. These badges are referred to as "common" plates.

The common plates that follow were very popular during the period 1812-1835 and, although relatively rare today, were made in considerable quantity and in many die variations for the Militia in every part of the country. They are known in brass, copper, and silver-on-copper. It is possible that specimens such as these may have been worn by some officers of the Regular Establishment between 1814 and 1821.

The common plates that follow were very popular during the period 1812-1835 and, although they're relatively rare today, they were produced in large quantities and in many die variations for the Militia across the country. They're known in brass, copper, and silver-on-copper. It's possible that items like these may have been worn by some officers of the Regular Establishment between 1814 and 1821.

CAP PLATE, 1814-1825(?)

USNM 60263-M (S-K 21). Figure 102.

USNM 60263-M (S-K 21). Figure 102.

Figure 102

Figure 102

This is a typical example of the common plates of the 1814-1835 period. The piece is struck in brass and has an edged and stippled border. The design is dominated by an eagle with wings outspread, head to left, arrows in right talon, olive branch in left talon, and with the national motto on a ribbon overhead. The whole is superimposed on a trophy of arms and colors with an arc of 13 6-pointed stars above. A plume socket, apparently original, is soldered to the reverse, as are two looped-wire fasteners. The fasteners are of a later period.

This is a typical example of common plates from the 1814-1835 period. The piece is made of brass and features an edged and stippled border. The design is mainly centered around an eagle with its wings spread, facing left, holding arrows in its right talon and an olive branch in its left talon, with the national motto displayed on a ribbon above. The entire image is set against a backdrop of weapons and colors, with an arc of 13 six-pointed stars above. A plume socket, likely original, is soldered to the back, along with two looped-wire fasteners. The fasteners are from a later period.

(p. 54) CAP PLATE, 1814-1825(?)

USNM 60264-M (S-K 22). Figure 103.

USNM 60264-M (S-K 22). Figure 103.

Figure 103

Figure 103

Struck in copper and silvered, this piece is a die variant of the preceding plate. A floral border replaces the plain border, and the overhead arc has 5-pointed rather than 6-pointed stars. The floral border marks it as probably an officer's device.

Struck in copper and silvered, this piece is a die variant of the previous plate. A floral border replaces the plain border, and the overhead arc features 5-pointed stars instead of 6-pointed ones. The floral border indicates that this is likely an officer's device.

CAP PLATE, 1814-1825(?)

USNM 60313-M (S-K 69). Figure 104.

USNM 60313-M (S-K 69). Figure 104.

Figure 104

Figure 104

A die variant of the preceding plate, this device has an unusually wide floral border. As in so many of the common pieces of this period, the center device was purposely designed small so that the die could be used to strike matching waist-belt plates. Examples of waist-belt plates struck from dies of this particular design are known. Struck in copper, there is a plume socket soldered to the reverse along with two looped-wire fasteners. The fasteners are not contemporary.

A die variant of the previous plate, this piece has an unusually wide floral border. Like many of the common items from this time, the central design was intentionally made small so that the die could be used to create matching waist-belt plates. Examples of waist-belt plates created from dies of this specific design are known. Made of copper, there is a plume socket soldered onto the back along with two looped-wire fasteners. The fasteners are not original.

CAP PLATE, 1814-1825(?)

USNM 60314-M (S-K 70). Figure 105.

USNM 60314-M (S-K 70). Figure 105.

Figure 105

Figure 105

This is a die variant of the three plates immediately preceding. However, the center device lacks the fineness of detail of the others, a fact that suggests that several makers working with different die sinkers produced this basic pattern. The plate is struck in copper, and originally it had a plume socket attached to the reverse. The present looped-wire fasteners are not original.

This is a die variant of the three plates right before this one. However, the central design doesn't have the same level of detail as the others, which suggests that different makers using various die sinkers created this basic pattern. The plate is made of copper, and it originally had a plume socket attached to the back. The current looped-wire fasteners are not original.

CAP PLATE, 1814-1825(?)

USNM 60299-M (S-K 57). Figure 106.

USNM 60299-M (S-K 57). Figure 106.

Figure 106

Figure 106

This plate, which is of brass, is of a less common design than its predecessors. However, since there is another such plate, but of silver-on-copper, in the national collections, it can be surmised that pieces of this same pattern were made for use by several different units.

This brass plate has a less common design compared to its predecessors. However, since there is another similar plate made of silver-on-copper in the national collections, it can be inferred that items with this same pattern were created for use by several different units.

A floral-bordered shield is topped by an out-sized sunburst with 13 stars, clouds, and the motto "Unity (p. 55) is Strength." In the center of the shield is the eagle, with wings widely outspread and with lightning bolts in the right talon and an olive branch in the left talon. The lightning bolt device, obvious sign of belligerency, first appeared about 1800 and is not seen in plates designed after 1821. The motto and the date 1776 are far more typical of Militia than Regular Army usage.

A floral-bordered shield is topped by a large sunburst featuring 13 stars, clouds, and the motto "Unity (p. 55) is Strength." In the center of the shield is the eagle, with its wings spread wide, holding lightning bolts in its right talon and an olive branch in its left talon. The lightning bolt symbol, a clear sign of aggression, first appeared around 1800 and is no longer found in designs made after 1821. The motto and the date 1776 are much more characteristic of Militia than Regular Army usage.

¶ In 1821 the Regular Army discarded all its large cap plates and adopted the bell-crown leather cap. Militia organizations lost no time in adopting a similar cap and, conversely, placing on it—and on the tall beaver which followed in the 1830's—the largest plates it could accommodate, using variations of discarded Regular Army patterns as well as original designs.

¶ In 1821, the Regular Army got rid of all its large cap plates and switched to the bell-crown leather cap. Militia groups quickly followed suit by adopting a similar cap and, on top of that, adding the largest plates they could fit on it—and on the tall beaver hats that came in the 1830s—using variations of the old Regular Army designs along with some original ones.

From 1821 until well into the 1840's large cap plates were mass-produced by manufacturers in Boston, New York, Philadelphia, and perhaps other cities of the New England metal manufacturing area. The few early platemakers, such as Crumpton and Armitage of Philadelphia and Peasley of Boston, were (p. 56) joined by a number of others. Prominent among these were Charles John Joullain, who made plates in New York during the 1820's, and William Pinchin of Philadelphia. Joullain is first listed in New York directories, in 1817, as a "gilder," and so continues through 1828. Sometimes his given name is listed as Charles, sometimes as James, and finally as Charles James. From 1820 to 1828 his address is the same, 32 Spring Street. There is a William Pinchin (Pinchon) listed in the Philadelphia directories as a silverplater or silversmith almost continuously from 1785 through 1863, indicating the possibility of a family occupation.

From 1821 until well into the 1840s, large cap plates were mass-produced by manufacturers in Boston, New York, Philadelphia, and possibly other cities in the New England metal manufacturing region. The few early platemakers, like Crumpton and Armitage of Philadelphia and Peasley of Boston, were (p. 56) joined by several others. Notable among these were Charles John Joullain, who created plates in New York during the 1820s, and William Pinchin of Philadelphia. Joullain is first listed in New York directories in 1817 as a "gilder," and this continues through 1828. Sometimes he is listed as Charles, other times as James, and finally as Charles James. From 1820 to 1828, his address remains the same: 32 Spring Street. There is a William Pinchin (Pinchon) listed in the Philadelphia directories as a silverplater or silversmith almost continuously from 1785 through 1863, suggesting the possibility of a family business.

It is believed that some of the New England makers of uniform buttons also manufactured plates. Among such buttonmakers of the 1820's and 1830's were R. and W. Robinson, D. Evans and Co., Leavenworth and Co., Benedict and Coe, and others in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Buttonmakers often stamped their names or easily recognizable hallmarks on the back of their products.

It is believed that some of the uniform button makers in New England also made plates. Among these button makers in the 1820s and 1830s were R. and W. Robinson, D. Evans and Co., Leavenworth and Co., Benedict and Coe, and others in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Button makers often stamped their names or recognizable logos on the back of their products.

In most cases it is virtually impossible to ascertain the precise units for which these different plates were first designed, and the problem is further complicated because the maker would sell a specific plate design to several different units. Those designs that incorporate all or part of a state's seal were originally made for Militia organizations of the particular state, but in several instances these plates were sold—altered or not—to units in other parts of the country. Militia organizations that were widely separated geographically purchased cap plates from distant manufacturers who had perhaps a dozen or more stock patterns to offer at a cost much lower than that involved in making a new die from which to strike custom-made ornaments. It made no difference to the Savannah Greys, in Georgia, that their new cap plates were the same as those worn by organizations in Pennsylvania and Massachusetts. Toward the end of this period of large cap plates, manufacturers came out with two-piece ornaments. After 1833, when the Regiment of United States Dragoons was authorized its large sunburst plate with separate eagle ornament in the center, insignia makers introduced a veritable rash of full sunburst, three-quarter sunburst, and half-sunburst cap plates with interchangeable centers. And for the first time small Militia units could afford their own distinctive devices at little extra cost. Shoulder-belt and waist-belt plates underwent the same evolution, and by the late 1830's such plates had become a mixture of either single die stampings or composite plates made of several parts soldered or otherwise held onto a rectangular or oval background.

In most cases, it’s nearly impossible to figure out the exact units that these different plates were originally designed for, and the issue is made worse because the manufacturer would sell a specific plate design to various units. Designs that include all or part of a state's seal were initially made for militia organizations of that state, but in some cases, these plates were sold—modified or not—to units in other regions of the country. Militia organizations located far apart would buy cap plates from distant manufacturers who possibly had a dozen or more stock patterns available at much lower prices than creating a new die for custom-made ornaments. The Savannah Greys in Georgia didn’t mind that their new cap plates were identical to those worn by organizations in Pennsylvania and Massachusetts. Toward the end of this period of large cap plates, manufacturers started producing two-piece ornaments. After 1833, when the Regiment of United States Dragoons was authorized its large sunburst plate with a separate eagle ornament in the center, insignia makers introduced a flood of full sunburst, three-quarter sunburst, and half-sunburst cap plates with interchangeable centers. For the first time, small militia units could afford their own unique designs at minimal extra cost. Shoulder-belt and waist-belt plates experienced the same evolution, and by the late 1830s, these plates had become a mix of either single die stampings or composite plates made of several parts soldered or otherwise attached to a rectangular or oval background.

Study of cap plates and other insignia in the Huddy and Duval prints in U.S. Military Magazine points to the years between 1833 and perhaps 1837 or 1838 as the transition period from single to composite ornaments, years during which there was also tremendous growth in the popularity and number of independent Militia units. In contrast to the 1820's when the Militia often waited until the Regulars discarded a device before adopting it, in 1840 there were no less than five organizations, mounted and dismounted, wearing the 1833 dragoon plate in full form while it was still in use by the Regulars. U.S. Military Magazine illustrates such plates for the Richmond Light Infantry Blues, the Georgia Hussars, the Macon Volunteers, the Jackson Rifle Corps of Lancaster, Pa., the Montgomery Light Guard, and the Harrison Guards of Allentown, Pa. The plate of the Harrison Guards is an example of the license sometimes practiced by Huddy and Duval in the preparation of their military prints. The color bearer in this print is depicted wearing a full sunburst plate, while the description of the uniform called for "a semi-circular plate or gloria."[104]

Study of cap plates and other insignia in the Huddy and Duval prints in U.S. Military Magazine indicates that the years between 1833 and maybe 1837 or 1838 were a transition period from single to composite ornaments. During this time, there was also significant growth in the popularity and number of independent Militia units. Unlike in the 1820s, when the Militia typically waited for the Regulars to discard a device before adopting it, by 1840, there were at least five mounted and dismounted organizations wearing the 1833 dragoon plate in full form while it was still in use by the Regulars. U.S. Military Magazine shows such plates for the Richmond Light Infantry Blues, the Georgia Hussars, the Macon Volunteers, the Jackson Rifle Corps of Lancaster, Pa., the Montgomery Light Guard, and the Harrison Guards of Allentown, Pa. The plate of the Harrison Guards is an example of the flexibility sometimes used by Huddy and Duval in their military prints. The color bearer in this print is shown wearing a full sunburst plate, while the description of the uniform called for "a semi-circular plate or gloria."[104]

In the following descriptions of plates, the term "stock pattern" is used because the insignia are known to have been worn by more than one organization, because their basic designs are so elementary that it appears obvious that they were made for wide distribution, or because they are known to have been made both in silver and in gilt metals.

In the following descriptions of plates, the term "stock pattern" is used because the insignia are known to have been worn by more than one organization, because their basic designs are so simple that it seems clear they were made for broad distribution, or because they are known to have been made in both silver and gold metals.

CAP PLATE, ARTILLERY, C. 1825

USNM 60307-M (S-K 64). Figure 107.

USNM 60307-M (S-K 64). Figure 107.

Figure 107

Figure 107

On the raised center of this shield-shaped plate is the eagle-on-cannon device within an oval floral border; the Federal shield is below. The whole is superimposed on a trophy of arms and colors with portions of a modified sunburst appearing on the sides. The plate is struck in brass. The eagle-on-cannon first appeared on Regular artillery buttons in 1802. About 1808 it was used as an embossed device on the leather fan cockade, and in 1814 it became the principal design element of the cap plate for (p. 57) Regulars. This plate is thought to be one of the earliest of the post-1821 series of Militia cap plates incorporating the discarded design of the Regular artillery.

On the raised center of this shield-shaped plate is the eagle-on-cannon design set within an oval floral border; below it is the Federal shield. The entire design is overlaid on a trophy of arms and colors, with parts of a modified sunburst visible on the sides. The plate is made of brass. The eagle-on-cannon first appeared on Regular artillery buttons in 1802. Around 1808, it was used as an embossed design on the leather fan cockade, and in 1814 it became the main design feature of the cap plate for (p. 57) Regulars. This plate is believed to be one of the earliest in the post-1821 series of Militia cap plates that incorporated the discontinued design from the Regular artillery.

UNIDENTIFIED ORNAMENT, PROBABLY CAP PLATE, C. 1821

USNM 60331-M (S-K 87). Figure 108.

USNM 60331-M (S-K 87). Figure 108.

Figure 108

Figure 108

This silver-on-copper plate is unique in size, shape, and over-all design. It is one of the most unusual Militia insignia in the national collections. The standing eagle of the 1807 mint design with Federal shield, the panoply of arms and colors, and the rayed background all suggest that this plate was made not later than the early 1820's. Quite possibly it is a cap plate of the War of 1812 period, but positive dating is impossible. Three simple wire fasteners are affixed to the reverse.

This silver-on-copper plate is distinct in size, shape, and overall design. It's one of the most unique Militia insignia in the national collections. The standing eagle from the 1807 mint design, featuring a Federal shield, an array of arms and colors, and a rayed background all indicate that this plate was created no later than the early 1820s. It's quite possible that it is a cap plate from the War of 1812 era, but confirming the exact date is not possible. Three simple wire fasteners are attached to the back.

CAP PLATE, ARTILLERY, C. 1825

USNM 60255-M (S-K 13). Figure 109.

USNM 60255-M (S-K 13). Figure 109.

Figure 109

Figure 109

Although the Regular riflemen wore a diamond-shaped plate from 1812 to 1814, this shape does not appear on Militia caps until the mid-1820's. It was a common form through the 1830's, but since it was always made as a one-piece die-struck plate it became out-dated in the late 1830's when the composite plates came into vogue.

Although the Regular riflemen wore a diamond-shaped plate from 1812 to 1814, this shape didn’t show up on Militia caps until the mid-1820s. It was a popular style through the 1830s, but since it was always made as a one-piece die-struck plate, it became outdated in the late 1830s when composite plates became trendy.

This plate, struck in brass and bearing the eagle-on-cannon device, must be considered a stock pattern available to many organizations. Insignia struck from the same die could have been easily made into shoulder-belt plates as well.

This plate, made of brass and featuring the eagle-on-cannon design, should be seen as a standard pattern that many organizations could use. Insignia created from the same die could have easily been turned into shoulder-belt plates as well.

(p. 58) CAP PLATE AND PLUME HOLDER, C. 1825

USNM 604748 (S-K 893). Figure 110.

USNM 604748 (S-K 893). Figure 110.

Figure 110

Figure 110

This brass plate is similar in many respects to the regular infantry cap plate, type I, 1814-1821. It is attached to a bell-crowned shako of distinctly Militia origin and is cut in the diamond shape popular with the Militia in the 1820's and 1830's. The design lies within a raised oval dominated by an eagle similar to ones used on War of 1812 insignia. Below the eagle is a Federal shield and a trophy of stacked muskets, a drum surmounted by a dragoon helmet, a gun on a truck carriage, and colors—one the National Colors with 16 stars in the canton.

This brass plate is a lot like the standard infantry cap plate, type I, from 1814-1821. It’s attached to a bell-crowned shako that clearly comes from the Militia and is shaped like a diamond, which was popular with the Militia in the 1820s and 1830s. The design is set inside a raised oval featuring an eagle similar to those used in War of 1812 insignia. Below the eagle, there’s a Federal shield and a trophy made up of stacked muskets, a drum topped with a dragoon helmet, a gun on a wheeled carriage, and colors—one being the National Colors with 16 stars in the canton.

The plume holder attached to the cap above the plate is an unusually interesting and distinctive device. It is a hemisphere of thin brass with a round plume socket at the top. The hemisphere has an eagle on a shield and a superimposed wreath device in silver. The blazonry of the shield cannot be identified with any particular state or locality.

The plume holder connected to the cap above the plate is a uniquely interesting and distinctive device. It's a dome made of thin brass with a round socket for a plume at the top. The dome features an eagle on a shield and a silver wreath design on top. The design of the shield doesn't match any specific state or area.

CAP PLATE, C. 1821

USNM 60262 (S-K 20). Figure 111.

USNM 60262 (S-K 20). Figure 111.

Figure 111

Figure 111

The familiar hooked-beak eagle dominates the center of this brass, scalloped-edge plate. The arrows of belligerency, however, are held in the left talon. Surrounding the eagle is a three-quarter wreath of olive with the national motto above and the date 1776 below. While there is a possibility that this plate may fall into the period 1814-1821 because of its outline shape, it lacks the panoply of arms associated with that era. It is much more probable that this is one of the earliest plates made for Militia during the years 1821-1830. Since this plate is also known in silver-on-copper, it is considered a stock pattern.

The iconic hooked-beak eagle takes center stage on this brass plate with a scalloped edge. The arrows of aggression, however, are grasped in its left talon. Surrounding the eagle is a three-quarter wreath of olive branches, with the national motto at the top and the date 1776 at the bottom. Although there's a chance this plate could date between 1814 and 1821 due to its shape, it doesn't feature the array of arms typical of that time. It's much more likely that this is one of the earliest plates made for the Militia from 1821 to 1830. Since this plate is also found in silver-on-copper, it's regarded as a standard design.

CAP PLATE, MILITIA, ARTILLERY(?), C. 1821

USNM 60306-M (S-K 63). Figure 112.

USNM 60306-M (S-K 63). Figure 112.

Figure 112

Figure 112

This oval, brass-struck plate framed within a large wreath of laurel is one of the finest in the national collections, comprising as it does a number of devices of excellent design and considerable detail standing in high relief. The curving line of 21 stars above the motto, decreasing in size laterally, is an interesting detail, and the eagle and panoply of arms is reminiscent of those on the plate ascribed to the Regiment of Light Artillery, 1814-1821, and on several of the common Militia plates of the same period. It is (p. 59) assigned to the artillery because of its "yellow metal" composition. It has simple wire fasteners, applied to the reverse, and carries no plume socket.

This oval, brass plate surrounded by a large laurel wreath is one of the best in the national collections. It features several designs that are beautifully crafted and have a lot of fine detail in high relief. The curved line of 21 stars above the motto, which gets smaller from side to side, is an interesting detail. The eagle and collection of arms remind us of those on the plate linked to the Regiment of Light Artillery from 1814-1821, as well as several common Militia plates from the same time. It is (p. 59) attributed to the artillery because of its "yellow metal" composition. It has simple wire fasteners attached to the back and doesn’t have a plume socket.

CAP PLATE, NEW YORK, C. 1825

USNM 60273-M (S-K 31). Figure 113.

USNM 60273-M (S-K 31). Figure 113.

Figure 113

Figure 113

This unusually large, shield-shaped plate, struck in brass, is dominated by an eagle—within a smaller shield with raised edge—standing on a half globe and wreath of the colors, both of which are superimposed on a trophy of arms and flags; clouds and sun rays are above. The specimen represents one of the large cap plate patterns adopted by the Militia for wear on the bell-crown cap soon after it came into general use in the early 1820's. While a stock pattern in a sense, its use was most likely confined to New York State Militia because its principal device, the eagle-on-half-globe, is taken directly from that state's seal. These large plates were widely worn until the middle or late 1830's when newer styles began to replace them. The plume socket affixed to the reverse appears to be contemporary, but has been resoldered.

This unusually large, shield-shaped plate, made of brass, features an eagle—inside a smaller shield with a raised edge—standing on a half globe and a wreath of colors, both placed over a trophy of arms and flags; above are clouds and sun rays. This piece is one of the large cap plate designs that the Militia adopted for use on the bell-crown cap shortly after it became popular in the early 1820s. While it is a standard pattern in a way, its usage was likely limited to the New York State Militia because its main design, the eagle-on-half-globe, is directly from that state's seal. These large plates were commonly worn until the mid to late 1830s, when newer styles began to take their place. The plume socket attached to the back seems to be from the same period but has been resoldered.

CAP PLATE, NEW YORK, C. 1825

USNM 60356-M (S-K 112). Figure 114.

USNM 60356-M (S-K 112). Figure 114.

Figure 114

Figure 114

This is a variant of the preceding plate and well illustrates how an insignia-maker could adapt a single die for several products. The eagle-on-half-globe, with a portion of the trophy of arms and colors, and the clouds and sunburst above have merely been cut out from the plate proper for use alone. The plate is struck in brass.

This is a variation of the previous plate and clearly shows how an insignia-maker could use a single die for multiple products. The eagle on the half-globe, along with part of the trophy of arms and colors, as well as the clouds and sunburst above, have simply been cut out from the main plate for standalone use. The plate is made of brass.

Another specimen, of silver-on-copper, is known, indicating that this insignia was made for wear by infantry as well as by other branches of the service; consequently, it may be termed a stock pattern.

Another example, made of silver on copper, is known, suggesting that this insignia was designed for use by infantry as well as other branches of the service; therefore, it can be referred to as a standard pattern.

CAP PLATE, NEW YORK, C. 1825

USNM 60266-M (S-K 24). Figure 115.

USNM 60266-M (S-K 24). Figure 115.

Figure 115

Figure 115

Illustrating fine craftsmanship, this elaborate brass cap plate comprises perhaps the most ornate and intricately detailed design ever attempted by a military ornament die sinker. The strike itself has been so well executed that the most minute details are (p. 60) even today readily discernible, even after very apparent use. Made for New York Militia, its central theme is the eagle-on-half-globe superimposed on a trophy of arms and flags.

Illustrating exceptional craftsmanship, this detailed brass cap plate features possibly the most ornate and intricately detailed design ever created by a military ornament die sinker. The strike is so well done that even the tiniest details are (p. 60) still clearly visible today, despite signs of wear. Made for the New York Militia, its central theme displays an eagle on a half-globe overlaid on a trophy of arms and flags.

Many of the facets of detail are of particular interest. Almost every ray of the aura of sunlight can still be clearly seen; the North Pole is well marked with a vertical arrow; the Arctic Circle, Tropic of Capricorn, and the Equator are included on the half-globe, as are the meridians of longitude and the parallels of latitude; both North America and South America are shown, and that portion of North America east of the Mississippi basin is clearly denominated "United States." An unusual feature of the design is the way the arrows are held in the eagle's left talon—some of the arrow heads point inward, some outward. What appears to have been a contemporary plume socket has been resoldered to the reverse.

Many details are particularly interesting. Almost every ray of sunlight's aura can still be clearly seen; the North Pole is marked with a vertical arrow; the Arctic Circle, Tropic of Capricorn, and the Equator are included on the half-globe, as well as the lines of longitude and latitude; both North America and South America are shown, and the part of North America east of the Mississippi basin is clearly labeled "USA." An unusual aspect of the design is how the arrows are held in the eagle's left claw—some of the arrowheads point inward, while others point outward. What seems to have been a contemporary plume socket has been resoldered to the back.

Although this plate is unmarked as to maker, another plate of a similar design but of silver-on-copper has the maker's mark "J. JOULLAIN, MAKER, N. YORK." Since two distinct but similar designs are known, and the finished product is found in both brass and silver-on-copper, it seems probable that this plate was produced by more than one maker, and for all arms of the service. It is therefore deemed a stock pattern.

Although this plate doesn't have a maker's mark, another plate with a similar design made of silver-on-copper is marked with "J. Joullain, Manufacturer, N. York." Since there are two different but similar designs known, and the finished product is available in both brass and silver-on-copper, it seems likely that this plate was made by multiple makers for all branches of the service. As a result, it is considered a stock pattern.

CAP PLATE, RIFLEMEN, C. 1825

USNM 60267-M (S-K 25). Figure 116.

USNM 60267-M (S-K 25). Figure 116.

Figure 116

Figure 116

Almost immediately after the last Regular rifle regiment was disbanded in 1821, Militia riflemen adopted the large open horn with loops and tassels that the Regulars had worn from 1817 to 1821. The basic device was altered slightly by showing an eagle in flight and the horn suspended much lower on its cords. The illustrated brass plate is one of four die variants, and more than a dozen similar to it have been examined. It is significant that all are of brass, for these were made and worn during the period when the trimmings for infantry were silver or "white metal."

Almost immediately after the last Regular rifle regiment was disbanded in 1821, Militia riflemen adopted the large open horn with loops and tassels that the Regulars had worn from 1817 to 1821. The basic design was slightly modified to feature an eagle in flight and the horn hanging much lower on its cords. The illustrated brass plate is one of four die variations, and more than a dozen similar ones have been examined. It's important to note that all are made of brass, as these were created and worn during a time when infantry trimmings were either silver or "white metal."

This plate differs from the others examined in that it has 17 6-pointed stars along the upper and lower parts of the shield inside the border. The number of stars cannot be significant in dating for the plate was (p. 61) obviously made long after 1812 when the 18th state, Louisiana, was admitted to the Union. A plume socket affixed to the reverse appears to be original.

This plate is different from the others we've looked at because it has 17 six-pointed stars along the top and bottom of the shield inside the border. The number of stars isn't useful for dating, as the plate was obviously made long after 1812 when Louisiana, the 18th state, was added to the Union. A plume socket attached to the back seems to be original.

Undoubtedly made as a stock pattern by several manufacturers, these plates continued in use for at least 15 years after they first appeared about 1825. Although U.S. Military Magazine illustrates many large cap plates for the period 1839-1841, none has a shield outline. This may indicate a decline in the popularity of the design, but it must be remembered that Huddy and Duval presented the uniforms of only a small cross-section of the Militia of the period.

Undoubtedly produced as a standard design by several manufacturers, these plates remained in use for at least 15 years after they first came out around 1825. Although U.S. Military Magazine shows many large cap plates from the period 1839-1841, none have a shield outline. This might suggest a drop in the popularity of the design, but it’s important to remember that Huddy and Duval showcased the uniforms of only a small portion of the Militia from that time.

CAP PLATE, RIFLEMEN, C. 1825

USNM 60267-M (S-K 26). Figure 117.

USNM 60267-M (S-K 26). Figure 117.

Figure 117

Figure 117

This is a second form of Militia riflemen's plates. Struck in brass, it differs from the preceding primarily in the placement of 17 5-pointed stars along the upper half of the shield, between the borders. Other small differences show that the basic die was not that used for the preceding specimen. The most obvious difference (p. 62) is the legend "E PLURIBUS UNUM" carried on the ribbon behind the knotted cord of the horn, an element not present in the other.

This is a second type of Militia riflemen's plates. Made of brass, it differs from the previous one mainly in the arrangement of 17 5-pointed stars along the upper half of the shield, between the borders. Other minor differences indicate that the basic die was not the same as the one used for the earlier specimen. The most noticeable difference (p. 62) is the inscription "Out of many, one" displayed on the ribbon behind the knotted cord of the horn, which is not found in the other.

A third form, not illustrated, substitutes a floral border for the plain border around the edge of the shield and contains no stars as part of the design. Still a fourth form, also not illustrated, has the same center device of eagle and open horn placed in a longer and narrower shield, with 23 6-pointed stars between the borders.

A third version, which isn’t shown, replaces the plain border around the edge of the shield with a floral border and doesn’t include any stars in the design. There’s also a fourth version, which also isn’t shown, that features the same central design of an eagle and an open horn set in a longer and narrower shield, with 23 six-pointed stars between the borders.

¶ These various combinations of devices give a good clue as to the method of manufacture of stock patterns, and indicate the use of several different dies and hand punches. The blank metal was first struck by a die that formed the plain or floral border and cut the outline of the plate. Next, a smaller die containing the center device of eagle and horn was used. Then the stars, and sometimes elements of the floral border, were added by individual striking with a hand punch. This latter method is clearly revealed by the comparison of several "identical" plates in which the stars or elements of the border are irregularly and differently spaced.

¶ These different combinations of tools provide a clear idea of how stock patterns were made and show the use of various dies and hand punches. First, the blank metal was pressed by a die that created the simple or floral border and cut the outline of the plate. Next, a smaller die with the eagle and horn design in the center was used. Then, the stars and sometimes parts of the floral border were added by individually striking them with a hand punch. This last method is evident when comparing several "identical" plates, where the stars or border elements are unevenly and differently spaced.

CAP PLATE, RIFLEMAN PATTERN, C. 1825

USNM 60398-M (S-K 154). Figure 118.

USNM 60398-M (S-K 154). Figure 118.

Figure 118

Figure 118

This plate is called "rifleman pattern" because it is silver-on-copper and is the only known example of this type of insignia made for wear by infantry, or possibly for Militia riflemen whose trimmings were, incorrectly, silver.

This plate is called the "rifleman pattern" because it features silver on copper and is the only known example of this kind of insignia made for infantry, or possibly for Militia riflemen whose trimmings were mistakenly silver.

There are several conjectures about this cut-out device made from a die of the preceding series of shield plates. It may have been made after 1834, when the open horn with cord and tassels was adopted by the Regular infantry as a branch device. It is equally possible that it was submitted to a Militia infantry organization by some maker as a sample during the 1820's and when selected was silvered to conform with other trimmings. In either case, it illustrates how a single die could serve to make many different variations from a basic design.

There are several theories about this cut-out device made from a die of the previous series of shield plates. It might have been created after 1834, when the open horn with cord and tassels was adopted by the Regular infantry as a branch device. It's also possible that it was presented to a Militia infantry organization by some maker as a sample during the 1820s, and when chosen, it was silvered to match other decorations. In either case, it shows how a single die could be used to create many different variations from a basic design.

CAP PLATE, RIFLEMEN, C. 1825

USNM 60304-M (S-K 61B). Figure 119.

USNM 60304-M (S-K 61B). Figure 119.

Figure 119

Figure 119

The very unusual construction of this brass plate for riflemen indicates that it is possibly one of the earliest of the composite plates. Within a wreath of crossed laurel boughs is a small center circle with raised edge to which has been soldered the eagle and horn device struck in convex form.

The unique design of this brass plate for riflemen suggests that it could be one of the earliest composite plates. Inside a wreath of crossed laurel branches is a small central circle with a raised edge, to which the eagle and horn insignia has been soldered in a convex shape.

(p. 63) CAP PLATE, RIFLEMEN, C. 1830

USNM 60252-M (S-K 10). Figure 120.

USNM 60252-M (S-K 10). Figure 120.

Figure 120

Figure 120

The diamond-shaped plate was in vogue with Militia units during the late 1820's and the 1830's. Examples of such plates for the Washington Grays (Philadelphia) and the Philadelphia Grays are recorded in U.S. Military Magazine.[105] This brass plate, possibly made for a particular unit from stock dies, is a typical example of the endless variety possible with the use of a few dies. The blank was struck with a die for the center device of eagle and horn, but the irregularity of the spacing of the stars shows that they were added later by hand. Similar plates may be found with essentially this same device, but placed on small shields or backgrounds of other shapes.

The diamond-shaped plate was popular with Militia units during the late 1820s and the 1830s. Examples of such plates for the Washington Grays (Philadelphia) and the Philadelphia Grays are documented in U.S. Military Magazine.[105] This brass plate, possibly made for a specific unit from standard dies, is a typical example of the endless variety achievable using just a few dies. The blank was stamped with a die for the central design of an eagle and horn, but the uneven spacing of the stars indicates that they were added later by hand. Similar plates can be found with essentially the same design, but set on small shields or backgrounds of different shapes.

CAP PLATE, C. 1835

USNM 604851-M (S-K 996). Figure 121.

USNM 604851-M (S-K 996). Figure 121.

Figure 121

Figure 121

The eagle and horn devices were sometimes separated by the manufacturer to produce this type ornament open with cord and tassels. Struck in brass, it differs in form and detail from the silver horn adopted by the Regular infantry in 1834 as a cap plate.

The eagle and horn devices were sometimes separated by the manufacturer to create this type of ornament that opens with a cord and tassels. Made of brass, it differs in shape and detail from the silver horn that was adopted by the Regular infantry in 1834 as a cap plate.

Several Militia units of the late 1830's and 1840's used a horn as an additional ornament on the rear of the cap, notably the State Fencibles (Philadelphia) and the National Guard (Philadelphia). On the rear of the leather cap of the State Fencibles were "two broad rich stripes of silver lace, starting from the same point at the top and running down, forming an angle, in the center of which is a bugle ornament...."[106] The cap of the National Guard has been described as being "of blue cloth ... and in the rear a plated bugle ornament."[107]

Several militia units from the late 1830s and 1840s used a horn as an extra decoration on the back of their caps, especially the State Fencibles (Philadelphia) and the National Guard (Philadelphia). The leather cap of the State Fencibles featured "two broad rich stripes of silver lace, starting from the same point at the top and running down, forming an angle, in the center of which is a bugle ornament...."[106] The cap of the National Guard has been described as "of blue cloth ... and in the rear a plated bugle ornament."[107]

¶ In the following series of rather similar plates, four different dies are used for the center ornament, perhaps made by as many different die sinkers. The relatively large number of these plates still in existence suggests that they were worn very extensively. Those with silver finish were used by infantry; the gilt or copper ones by artillery and perhaps by staff officers. All specimens are currently fitted with plain wire (p. 64) fasteners and plume sockets, both of which may or may not be original.

¶ In the following series of fairly similar plates, four different dies are used for the center decoration, possibly created by different die sinkers. The relatively large number of these plates still around indicates that they were worn a lot. Plates with a silver finish were used by infantry, while the gilt or copper ones were used by artillery and possibly by staff officers. All specimens are currently fitted with simple wire fasteners and plume sockets, both of which may or may not be original.

CAP PLATE, INFANTRY, C. 1825

USNM 60271-M (S-K 29). Figure 122.

USNM 60271-M (S-K 29). Figure 122.

Figure 122

Figure 122

The floral-bordered shield outline of this silver-on-copper infantry plate is known to have been used also with the rifleman's eagle-horn device in the center. The panoply of arms and flags used as a background for the center device, which is characterized by the long neck of the eagle swung far to the right, links it closely to the plate of similar type worn during the period 1814-1821. Because of its large size, it is assigned to the post-1821 era of the bell-crown cap, contemporary with the riflemen's large plates. The 13 5-pointed stars were added with a hand punch.

The shield outline with a floral border on this silver-on-copper infantry plate was also used with the rifleman’s eagle-horn emblem in the center. The array of weapons and flags that forms the background for the central emblem, distinguished by the eagle's long neck turned far to the right, connects it closely to similar plates worn between 1814 and 1821. Due to its large size, it’s placed in the post-1821 era of the bell-crown cap, alongside the riflemen’s large plates. The 13 five-pointed stars were added using a hand punch.

CAP PLATE, C. 1825

USNM 60298-M (S-K 56). Figure 123.

USNM 60298-M (S-K 56). Figure 123.

Figure 123

Figure 123

This brass plate is a duplicate of the preceding, lacking only the hand-applied stars. The crispness of detail indicates that it was one of the very early products of the die.

This brass plate is a copy of the previous one, missing only the hand-applied stars. The sharpness of the details shows that it was one of the very first items made from the die.

CAP PLATE, C. 1825

USNM 60269-M (S-K 27). Figure 124.

USNM 60269-M (S-K 27). Figure 124.

Figure 124

Figure 124

The second variation of the series is a product of perhaps the best executed die of the group, with unusually fine detail in the eagle's wings and with neatly stacked cannon balls at the bottom of the center device. It includes other excellent detail not found in other dies: an eagle-head pommel on one sword, a star pattern made of smaller stars in the cantons of the flags, and crossed cannon, rammer, and worm behind the Federal shield. It is struck in brass.

The second variation of the series is made from probably the best die in the group, featuring exceptionally fine detail in the eagle's wings and neatly arranged cannonballs at the bottom of the central image. It includes other impressive details not present in other dies: an eagle-head pommel on one sword, a star pattern made up of smaller stars in the corners of the flags, and crossed cannon, rammer, and worm behind the Federal shield. It is made of brass.

CAP PLATE, C. 1825

USNM 60297-M (S-K 55). Figure 125.

USNM 60297-M (S-K 55). Figure 125.

Figure 125

Figure 125

A tall, slender, rather graceless eagle with broad wings and erect head reminiscent of the Napoleonic eagle is the outstanding difference in this third example of the series. The floral border lacks a finished (p. 65) look because the plate, which is of brass, was apparently hand trimmed.

A tall, slender, somewhat awkward eagle with broad wings and an upright head that reminds you of the Napoleonic eagle is the main difference in this third example of the series. The floral border looks unfinished because the plate, which is made of brass, was clearly hand-trimmed. (p. 65)

CAP PLATE, C. 1825

USNM 60270-M (S-K 28). Figure 126.

USNM 60270-M (S-K 28). Figure 126.

Figure 126

Figure 126

This fourth variation, of silver-on-copper, bears an eagle with very small legs (somewhat out of proportion), an erect head, a fierce mien, and a heavy round breast. The design is struck on a shield-plate with the exact measurements as on one of the riflemen series.

This fourth version, made of silver on copper, has an eagle with tiny legs (kind of out of proportion), an upright head, a fierce expression, and a heavy round chest. The design is stamped on a shield plate with the same measurements as one from the riflemen series.

CAP PLATE, MUSICIAN, C. 1825

USNM 60302-M (S-K 60). Figure 127.

USNM 60302-M (S-K 60). Figure 127.

Figure 127

Figure 127

The oldest known plate made expressly for musicians, this silver-on-copper, floral-bordered shield bears an eagle similar to one for riflemen of the same period (see fig. 116). Among the early musical instruments easily identifiable in the design are the tambor, the serpent, the French horn, and the rack of bells. Such a plate was undoubtedly a stock pattern, available in either gilt or silver finish, and was probably sold well into the 1840's. The reverse is fitted with what appears to be a contemporary plume socket, although resoldered, and two simple wire fasteners.

The oldest known plate specifically made for musicians, this silver-on-copper shield with a floral border features an eagle similar to one used by riflemen of the same period (see fig. 116). Among the early musical instruments clearly visible in the design are the tambourine, the serpent, the French horn, and a rack of bells. This plate was likely a standard design, offered in either gilded or silver finishes, and was probably sold well into the 1840s. The back is equipped with what looks like a contemporary plume socket, though it has been resoldered, along with two simple wire fasteners.

CAP PLATE, MUSICIAN, C. 1835

USNM 6030-M (S-K 61A). Figure 128.

USNM 6030-M (S-K 61A). Figure 128.

Figure 128

Figure 128

This gilded brass plate, while not as old as the preceding one, is of an unusual pattern. Made for New York State Militia, it carries the eagle-on-half-globe device at the top. The central design includes a French horn, a serpent, and a straight horn, all intertwined about an open roll of sheet music. It is probably a stock pattern. The reverse is fitted with three simple bent-wire fasteners.

This gold-plated brass plate, although not as old as the previous one, has a unique design. Created for the New York State Militia, it features the eagle-on-half-globe emblem at the top. The main design includes a French horn, a serpent, and a straight horn, all wrapped around an open roll of sheet music. It’s likely a standard pattern. The back has three basic bent-wire fasteners.

CAP PLATE, C. 1830

USNM 60250-M (S-K 8). Figure 129.

USNM 60250-M (S-K 8). Figure 129.

Figure 129

Figure 129

The design on this brass plate, reminiscent of that on the regular infantry cap plate, 1814-1821, was adopted for wear by the Militia after being discarded by the Regular Establishment. The ornate floral border and diamond shape place it in the late 1820's and the (p. 66) 1830's, although the lightning in the eagle's left talon and the arrows in its right talon are usually associated with plates designed prior to 1821. It has been suggested that this is the plate worn by the West Point cadets after 1821, but such seems doubtful.

The design on this brass plate, similar to that on the standard infantry cap plate from 1814-1821, was adopted for use by the Militia after being discarded by the Regular Establishment. The decorative floral border and diamond shape date it to the late 1820s and the (p. 66) 1830s, although the lightning in the eagle's left talon and the arrows in its right talon are typically linked to plates designed before 1821. It's been suggested that this is the plate worn by the West Point cadets after 1821, but that seems unlikely.

¶ No Militia plates enjoyed wider use or longer life than those patterned after the plate that disappeared from the Regular Establishment with the disbanding of the dragoons in 1815. More than a dozen die variants are known, several worn by more than one Militia unit. Although size and shape may vary, any plate exhibiting a mounted trooper with upraised saber can safely be assigned to mounted Militia. However, the dating of such plates is a real problem because they are known to have been in use as late as 1861.

¶ No Militia plates had more widespread use or lasted longer than those modeled after the plate that vanished from the Regular Establishment when the dragoons were disbanded in 1815. More than a dozen die variants are recognized, with several being used by multiple Militia units. While size and shape can differ, any plate showing a mounted trooper with an upraised saber can confidently be attributed to mounted Militia. However, determining the dates of these plates is quite challenging since they are known to have been in use up until 1861.

A Huddy and Duval print of the Washington Cavalry of Philadelphia County shows that unit (p. 67) wearing a plate similar to the one used by the Regulars, differing only in its brass composition, as opposed to the original pewter of the 1812 regulations.[108] A cap in the collections of the Valley Forge Museum that was worn by a member of this unit in the period 1835-1845 is very similar to the one shown in the Huddy and Duval print. The cap is a copy of the 1812 Regular Army pattern, with somewhat more ornate brass bindings in place of the iron strips. A similar cap, carrying the label "Canfield and Bro., Baltimore," is owned by Lexington, Virginia, descendants of a member of the Rockbridge [Virginia] Dragoons. That unit is said to have worn such a cap upon first entering Confederate service in 1861.

A Huddy and Duval print of the Washington Cavalry from Philadelphia County shows that unit (p. 67) wearing a breastplate similar to the one used by the Regulars, with the only difference being its brass material instead of the original pewter from the 1812 regulations.[108] A cap in the Valley Forge Museum collection, worn by a member of this unit between 1835 and 1845, closely resembles the one depicted in the Huddy and Duval print. The cap is a replica of the 1812 Regular Army style, featuring slightly more decorative brass embellishments instead of the iron strips. A similar cap, marked "Canfield and Bro., Baltimore," belongs to descendants in Lexington, Virginia, of a member of the Rockbridge [Virginia] Dragoons. This unit is said to have worn such a cap when they first entered Confederate service in 1861.

In the national collections there is a dragoon cap (USNM 604767, S-K 912) carrying a plate of this design struck on a massive diamond-shaped piece with concave sides. There are additional variations in several private collections and at the Fort Ticonderoga Museum. The mounted horseman device was also struck on heart-shaped martingale ornaments.

In the national collections, there's a dragoon cap (USNM 604767, S-K 912) featuring a plate of this design made on a large diamond-shaped piece with curved sides. There are more variations in several private collections and at the Fort Ticonderoga Museum. The mounted horseman design was also used on heart-shaped martingale ornaments.

CAP PLATE, DRAGOONS, C. 1830

USNM 60254-M (S-K 12). Figure 130.

USNM 60254-M (S-K 12). Figure 130.

Figure 130

Figure 130

The horseman on this brass plate, designed with a rather crude, childlike simplicity, is garbed quite differently than the Regular dragoon on the 1812 pewter specimen. The plate is assigned to the general 1830 period to fit the era of the diamond-shaped plates, but its use doubtless continued on into the 1840's. By nature of its design it would have been a manufacturer's stock pattern.

The horseman on this brass plate, created with a somewhat rough, childlike style, is dressed quite differently from the Regular dragoon on the 1812 pewter version. The plate is dated to the general 1830 period to match the time of the diamond-shaped plates, but its use likely continued into the 1840s. Due to its design, it would have been a standard pattern for manufacturers.

CAP PLATE, ARTILLERY(?), C. 1830

USNM 60301-M (S-K 59). Figure 131.

USNM 60301-M (S-K 59). Figure 131.

Figure 131

Figure 131

The eagle on this brass plate is similar to the ones on the preceding shield plates, but the Federal shield on which he stands is ornamented with three star devices composed of smaller stars. An unusual feature of this plate is the addition of the flaming portion of a grenade rising from the eagle's head, a device not a part of any other known cap plate. This (p. 68) symbol suggests artillery, and the plate is of the proper color. Although an unusual over-all design, the lack of any components of state arms or crests indicate that it may have been a stock pattern. The reverse is fitted with two simple bent-wire fasteners.

The eagle on this brass plate is similar to those on the previous shield plates, but the Federal shield it stands on is decorated with three star designs made up of smaller stars. A unique feature of this plate is the addition of a flaming grenade rising from the eagle's head, which isn't part of any other known cap plate. This (p. 68) symbol suggests artillery, and the plate is the right color. While it has an unusual overall design, the absence of any state arms or crests suggests it may have been a standard pattern. The back is equipped with two simple bent-wire fasteners.

CAP PLATE, MASSACHUSETTS INFANTRY, C. 1830

USNM 60355-M (S-K 111). Figure 132.

USNM 60355-M (S-K 111). Figure 132.

Figure 132

Figure 132

This silver-on-copper plate bears the familiar elements of the Massachusetts seal: Indian, in hunting shirt, with bow in right hand, arrow with point downward in left hand, and star above right shoulder. The crest—an arm grasping a broad sword on a wreath of the colors—is superimposed on a burst of sun rays above. The State's motto is written around the shield. The earlier plates containing elements of state arms were for the most part confined to the States of Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New York. No large plates bearing Pennsylvania State symbols that can be dated prior to 1835 are known.

This silver-on-copper plate features the well-known elements of the Massachusetts seal: an Indigenous person in a hunting shirt, holding a bow in their right hand and an arrow pointing down in their left hand, with a star above their right shoulder. The crest, which shows an arm holding a broad sword set on a wreath of colors, is placed over a burst of sun rays above. The State's motto is written around the shield. Earlier plates with elements of state arms were mostly limited to Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New York. There are no large plates with Pennsylvania State symbols that are known to exist before 1835.

This seal was not authorized by law until 1885. However, the devices and the motto were elements of the seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts ordered prepared by the state legislature in 1780 and, although apparently never formally approved, used as such for many years. It differs considerably in detail from the seal in use from 1629 to 1684.[109]

This seal wasn’t officially approved by law until 1885. However, the designs and the motto were parts of the seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts that the state legislature ordered to be made in 1780. Though it was never formally approved, it was used in that capacity for many years. It differs significantly in detail from the seal that was in use from 1629 to 1684.[109]

CAP PLATE, MASSACHUSETTS INFANTRY, C. 1835

USNM 60316-M (S-K 72). Figure 133.

USNM 60316-M (S-K 72). Figure 133.

Figure 133

Figure 133

This scalloped plate, which is struck in thin iron metal and silvered, bears elements of the Massachusetts seal, minus the motto, and the legend "Massachusetts Militia." Its silver color assigns it (p. 69) to the infantry. The form of the specimen indicates that it was probably designed prior to 1839. In consideration of its over-all design and the use of the word "Militia," it was probably made as a stock pattern and sold to several different organizations. A plume holder, which has been resoldered to the reverse, appears to be of the same metal as the plate proper. It is pierced at the sides for attachment.

This scalloped plate, made from thin iron and coated in silver, features elements of the Massachusetts seal, excluding the motto, and includes the label "Massachusetts National Guard." Its silver color identifies it as (p. 69) related to the infantry. The design suggests it was likely created before 1839. Considering its overall design and the use of the term "Militia," it was probably produced as a standard pattern and sold to various organizations. A plume holder, which has been re-soldered to the back, seems to be made from the same metal as the plate itself. It has holes on the sides for attachment.

¶ Painted cap fronts were worn during the War of the Revolution by several units of the Continental Army—including the Light Infantry Company of the Canadian Regiment, Haslet's Delaware Regiment, and the Rhode Island Train of Artillery[110]—and it is probable that the practice continued among some volunteer corps up to the War of 1812. Their use in the uniformed Militia units generally declined after the introduction of die-struck metal cap plates. Two notable exceptions are a cap plate of the Morris Rangers that is attached to a civilian-type round hat of the 1812-1814 period[111] and the cap front described below (fig. 137).

¶ Painted cap fronts were worn during the Revolutionary War by several units of the Continental Army—including the Light Infantry Company of the Canadian Regiment, Haslet's Delaware Regiment, and the Rhode Island Train of Artillery[110]—and it's likely that this practice continued among some volunteer corps up to the War of 1812. Their use in uniformed Militia units generally declined after die-struck metal cap plates were introduced. Two notable exceptions are a cap plate of the Morris Rangers that's attached to a civilian-type round hat from the 1812-1814 period[111] and the cap front described below (fig. 137).

Although discarded by the more elite volunteer corps, painted metal hat fronts in the "tombstone" shape similar to that of the Morris Rangers continued to be used, to some extent, by the common Militia. Easily attached to the ordinary civilian hat of the period, they provided the common Militia a quick and inexpensive transformation from civilian to military dress at their infrequent musters perhaps as late as 1840. There are several contemporary sketches of these musters and in one, dated 1829 (fig. 134), these "tombstone" plates can be identified.

Although rejected by the more elite volunteer groups, painted metal hat fronts in the "tombstone" shape, similar to those of the Morris Rangers, continued to be used, to some extent, by the regular Militia. They could be easily attached to the typical civilian hat of the time, offering the regular Militia a quick and affordable way to switch from civilian to military attire at their rare gatherings, possibly until as late as 1840. Several contemporary sketches of these gatherings exist, and in one dated 1829 (fig. 134), these "tombstone" plates can be seen.

Figure 134.—From Library of Congress print.

Figure 134.—From Library of Congress print.

A total of perhaps a dozen of these hat fronts are known. Most are of Connecticut origin, although at least two containing New York State devices are extant. The most elaborate of these devices bears, oddly enough, elements of the Connecticut State seal, the motto Qui Trans. Sust., and the crest of the Massachusetts coat of arms—an arm grasping a broad-sword (fig. 135). The elaborate detail of this plate indicates that it was probably an officer's. The fact that unit designations on other such known hat fronts run as high as the "23d Regt." is definite proof that these were devices of the common Militia as opposed to the volunteer corps.

A total of around twelve of these hat fronts are known. Most are from Connecticut, although at least two with New York State designs still exist. The most intricate of these designs features elements of the Connecticut State seal, the motto Qui Trans. Sust., and the crest of the Massachusetts coat of arms—an arm holding a broad sword (fig. 135). The detailed workmanship of this plate suggests it was likely made for an officer. The fact that unit designations on other known hat fronts go as high as the "23d Regt." definitely shows that these were symbols of the regular Militia rather than volunteer corps.

Figure 135.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 135.—Item in Campbell collection.

PAINTED CAP FRONT, CONNECTICUT, C. 1821

USNM 604764-M (S-K 909). Figure 136.

USNM 604764-M (S-K 909). Figure 136.

Figure 136

Figure 136

This painted front, of leather rather than metal, forms an integral part of the cap itself. Edged in gold, it has the unit designation "LIGHT INFANTRY: 2d COMP." in gold at the top; a shield in the center contains elements of the Connecticut State seal, and below it is the state motto "QUI TRANS SUST" ("He who brought us over here will sustains us").

This painted front, made of leather instead of metal, is an essential part of the cap itself. Trimmed in gold, it features the unit designation "Light Infantry: 2d COMP." in gold at the top; a shield in the center includes elements of the Connecticut State seal, and below it is the state motto "QUI TRANS SUST" ("He who brought us over here will sustain us").

CAP FRONT, C. 1830

USNM 60243-M (S-K 1). Figure 137.

USNM 60243-M (S-K 1). Figure 137.

Figure 137

Figure 137

A majority of these hat fronts are very similar in design, size, and shape, and are painted over a black background on thin precut sheets of tinned iron. This specimen carries a gold eagle with the Federal shield on its breast and a ribbon in its beak. The unit (p. 71) designation, "2d COMPY. 23d REGT.", also in gold, is below. The artwork, although somewhat unartistically executed, has an attractive simplicity. Other such hat fronts in the national collections are of the 2d Company, 6th Regiment; 3d Company, 6th Regiment; and 1st Company, 8th Regiment. The plate shown here has metal loops soldered to the reverse close to the edge midway between top and bottom for attachment to a civilian type hat by means of a ribbon or strip of cloth. Other such plates have hole for attachment with string.

Most of these hat fronts look quite similar in design, size, and shape, and they are painted on thin, precut sheets of tin over a black background. This particular piece features a gold eagle with the Federal shield on its chest and a ribbon in its beak. The unit (p. 71) designation, "2d COMPANY. 23d REGT.", is also in gold and appears below. The artwork, while not very artistically impressive, has a charming simplicity. Other similar hat fronts in the national collections belong to the 2d Company, 6th Regiment; 3d Company, 6th Regiment; and 1st Company, 8th Regiment. The plate shown here has metal loops soldered to the back near the edge, halfway between the top and bottom, for attaching it to a civilian-type hat using a ribbon or strip of cloth. Other plates have holes for attachment with string.

CAP PLATE, SOUTH CAROLINA, c. 1835-1850

USNM 60318-M (S-K 74). Figure 138.

USNM 60318-M (S-K 74). Figure 138.

Figure 138

Figure 138

This crescent-shaped, silver-on-copper plate bears an eagle that is very similar in design to the one adopted by the Regular Army in 1821. Sometimes mistakenly identified as a gorget because of its shape, the crescent form of the specimen is an old South Carolina State heraldic device. A cap worn by the Charleston Light Dragoons after the Civil War, and (p. 72) probably before, carries a similar crescent-shaped plate, with the familiar palmetto tree device substituted for the eagle.[112] The design of the eagle, however, places this piece in the 1835-1850 period. A silvered ornament, it may have been made originally for either infantry or dragoons, and must be considered a manufacturer's stock pattern.

This crescent-shaped silver plate on copper features an eagle that's quite similar in design to the one used by the Regular Army starting in 1821. It's often mistakenly called a gorget because of its shape, but the crescent design is actually an old heraldic symbol of South Carolina. A cap worn by the Charleston Light Dragoons after the Civil War, and probably before it, has a similar crescent-shaped plate, with the well-known palmetto tree replacing the eagle. The style of the eagle, though, indicates that this piece dates from between 1835 and 1850. Being a silvered ornament, it may have originally been made for either infantry or dragoons and should be seen as a common manufacturer’s design.

CAP PLATE, WASHINGTON GRAYS, C. 1835

USNM 60251-M (S-K 9). Figure 139.

USNM 60251-M (S-K 9). Figure 139.

Figure 139

Figure 139

This brass, diamond-shaped plate was worn by the Washington Grays, a light artillery outfit of Philadelphia. Within a raised oval are a profile of Washington—with his shoulders draped in a toga, a typically neoclassic touch—and, below, the unit designation "GRAYS" in raised letters. A matching oval shoulder-belt plate struck from the same die is known.[113]

This brass, diamond-shaped plate was worn by the Washington Grays, a light artillery unit from Philadelphia. In a raised oval, there's a profile of Washington, with his shoulders draped in a toga—a classic neoclassical detail—and below it is the unit designation "GRAYS" in raised letters. A matching oval shoulder-belt plate made from the same mold is also known.[113]

Many Militia units named themselves after prominent military personalities. There were Washington Guards, Washington Rifles, Jackson Artillerists, and so forth.

Many militia units named themselves after famous military figures. There were the Washington Guards, the Washington Rifles, the Jackson Artillerists, and so on.

CAP PLATE, NATIONAL GREYS, C. 1835

USNM 60291-M (S-K 49). Figure 140.

USNM 60291-M (S-K 49). Figure 140.

Figure 140

Figure 140

An illustration in U.S. Military Magazine[114] shows this plate being worn by the National Greys; however, with such a nondistinctive center ornament as the rosette of six petals, it must surely have been a stock pattern sold to many different organizations. The sunburst proper is struck in brass, as is the rosette, and each of the rays is pierced at the end for attachment. The rosette is affixed with a brass bolt, also for attachment, which must have extended through the front of the cap.

An illustration in U.S. Military Magazine[114] shows this plate being worn by the National Greys; however, with such a nondistinctive center ornament as the six-petaled rosette, it must have been a standard design sold to many different organizations. The sunburst is made of brass, just like the rosette, and each ray has a hole at the end for attachment. The rosette is secured with a brass bolt, also for attachment, which must have gone through the front of the cap.

CAP PLATE, ARTILLERY, C. 1840-1850

USNM 60333-M (S-K 89). Figure 141.

USNM 60333-M (S-K 89). Figure 141.

Figure 141

Figure 141

This plate is struck in very thin brass. The combination of devices in the design, especially of the (p. 73) cannon and cannon balls, indicates that it was probably made for Militia artillery. Its shape suggests that it may have been worn high on the cap front, with the sunburst serving an added function as a cockade of sorts. It was very probably a stock pattern.

This plate is made from very thin brass. The mix of designs, especially the (p. 73) cannon and cannonballs, suggests it was likely created for Militia artillery. Its shape indicates that it might have been worn high on the front of a cap, with the sunburst also serving as a kind of cockade. It was most likely a standard pattern.

CAP PLATE, MOUNTED TROOPS, C. 1836

USNM 60319-M (S-K 75). Figure 142.

USNM 60319-M (S-K 75). Figure 142.

Figure 142

Figure 142

From the size of this brass plate it can be assumed that it was worn without other ornament on the front of the round leather cap associated with mounted troops. The upper portion of the shield bears 8-pointed stars, an unusual feature. The arrows in the eagle's left talon point inward, a characteristic of eagle representation between 1832 and 1836. The plate is known both in brass and with silver finish. It was probably a stock pattern issued to both cavalry and mounted artillery.

From the size of this brass plate, it can be inferred that it was worn alone on the front of the round leather cap linked to mounted troops. The top part of the shield displays 8-pointed stars, which is an uncommon detail. The arrows in the eagle's left talon point inward, a distinct feature of eagle depictions from 1832 to 1836. The plate is available in both brass and silver finishes. It was likely a standard design issued to both cavalry and mounted artillery.

CAP EAGLE, C. 1836

USNM 60391-M (S-K 147). Figure 143.

USNM 60391-M (S-K 147). Figure 143.

Figure 143

Figure 143

This brass eagle was worn in combination with backgrounds of full-, half-, and three-quarter sunbursts and as a single ornament on the cap front. The inward-pointed arrows in the left talon place it in the 1832-1836 period. Known in both brass and silver-on-copper, it was a popular stock pattern sold to many units.

This brass eagle was worn along with backgrounds of full, half, and three-quarter sunbursts, and also as a standalone ornament on the front of the cap. The arrows that point inward in the left talon indicate it’s from the period of 1832-1836. It was available in both brass and silver-on-copper and was a popular stock design sold to many units.

CAP PLATE, C. 1836

USNM 60381-M (S-K 137). Figure 144.

USNM 60381-M (S-K 137). Figure 144.

Figure 144

Figure 144

Struck in copper, and silvered, this eagle, which is very similar in design to that prescribed for the Regular Establishment in both 1821 and 1832, was made for Militia infantry from about 1836 to perhaps as late as 1851. Specimens struck in brass are also known, and the same eagle is found on half-sunburst backgrounds. It is quite possible that this is the eagle illustrated in the Huddy and Duval prints as being worn by both the Washington Blues of Philadelphia and the U.S. Marine Corps.[115]

Struck in copper and coated in silver, this eagle, which closely resembles the design used by the Regular Establishment in both 1821 and 1832, was produced for Militia infantry from around 1836 to possibly as late as 1851. There are also known examples made from brass, and the same eagle appears on half-sunburst backgrounds. It’s quite likely that this is the eagle shown in the Huddy and Duval prints being worn by both the Washington Blues of Philadelphia and the U.S. Marine Corps.[115]

CHAPEAU ORNAMENT, C. 1836

USNM 60287-M (S-K 45). Figure 145.

USNM 60287-M (S-K 45). Figure 145.

Figure 145

Figure 145

This brass ornament is a die sample or unfinished badge. After the circular device was trimmed from (p. 74) the brass square, it would have been worn as an officer's chapeau ornament or as a side ornament on the round leather dragoon cap of the period. The four arrows in the eagle's left talon are unusual.

This brass ornament is a sample die or an unfinished badge. After the circular piece was cut from (p. 74) the brass square, it would have been worn as an officer's hat ornament or as a side decoration on the round leather dragoon cap of that time. The four arrows in the eagle's left talon are quite unusual.

CHAPEAU COCKADE, GENERAL OFFICER, C. 1840

USNM 604962-M (S-K 1156). Figure 146.

USNM 604962-M (S-K 1156). Figure 146.

Figure 146

Figure 146

This large, round chapeau cockade with its gold embroidery and sequins on black-ribbed silk and its ring of 24 silver-metal stars appears to be identical to cockades that have been shown as being worn around 1839 by Gen. Edmund P. Gaines and Gen. Winfield Scott[116] but without the added center eagle. Close examination of this cockade shows it to be complete, with no traces of a center eagle ever having been added. The 24 stars would have been appropriate at any time between 1821 and 1836.

This large, round hat with its gold embroidery and sequins on black ribbed silk and a ring of 24 silver metal stars looks just like the cockades worn around 1839 by Gen. Edmund P. Gaines and Gen. Winfield Scott[116], but without the added center eagle. A close look at this cockade shows it to be whole, with no signs of a center eagle ever having been added. The 24 stars would have been suitable at any time between 1821 and 1836.

CAP AND CAP PLATE, JACKSON ARTILLERISTS, C. 1836

USNM 604780 (S-K 925). Figure 147.

USNM 604780 (S-K 925). Figure 147.

Figure 147

Figure 147

The Jackson Artillerists of Philadelphia, after the appearance of the regular dragoon cap plate in 1833 and the large crossed cannon of the regular artillery one year later, lost no time in combining these two devices to make their distinctive cap device.[117] It seems probable, however, that the plate was adopted by other artillery units and eventually became more or less of a stock pattern.

The Jackson Artillerists of Philadelphia, after the regular dragoon cap plate was introduced in 1833 and the large crossed cannon of the regular artillery the following year, quickly combined these two designs to create their unique cap badge.[117] However, it seems likely that other artillery units adopted the badge, and it eventually turned into a common design.

CAP PLATE, WASHINGTON GRAYS(?), C. 1836

USNM 604608-M (S-K 755). Figure 148.

USNM 604608-M (S-K 755). Figure 148.

Figure 148

Figure 148

The Washington Grays of Philadelphia wore a diamond-shaped plate with a likeness of George (p. 75) Washington in the center (see fig. 139), but this plate, for some other "Washington" unit, bears his likeness in silver metal on a brass sunburst background. This silver outline of the head of Washington is also known on cartridge-box flaps of the period.

The Washington Grays of Philadelphia wore a diamond-shaped plate with an image of George (p. 75) Washington in the center (see fig. 139). However, this plate, meant for a different "Washington" unit, features his likeness in silver metal on a brass sunburst background. This silver outline of Washington's head is also commonly found on cartridge-box flaps from that time.

CAP PLATE, ARTILLERY, DIE SAMPLE, C. 1836

USNM 60288-M (S-K 46). Figure 149.

USNM 60288-M (S-K 46). Figure 149.

Figure 149

Figure 149

This uncut, brass cap plate may have been a manufacturer's die strike sent out as a sample, with others, so that a distant Militia organization could select a pattern. The finished plate is known on a bell-crown cap of the pattern of the 1820's, but its design indicates that it probably should be dated after 1834 when the Regular artillery first adopted the crossed-cannon device. The eagle is distinctly similar to the one adopted by the Regulars in lieu of cap plates in 1821, and the modified sunburst background probably was taken from the 1833 dragoon device.

This uncut brass cap plate might have been a manufacturer’s die strike sent out as a sample, along with others, so that a remote militia organization could choose a design. The finished plate is known on a bell-crown cap from the 1820s, but its design suggests it should likely be dated after 1834, when the Regular artillery first adopted the crossed-cannon emblem. The eagle is very similar to the one the Regulars used instead of cap plates in 1821, and the updated sunburst background was probably inspired by the 1833 dragoon device.

(p. 76) CAP PLATE, C. 1836

USNM 60292-M (S-K 50) Figure 150.

USNM 60292-M (S-K 50) Figure 150.

Figure 150

Figure 150

This cap plate is a somewhat wider variation of the 1833 dragoon device than most of the Militia plates of that type popular in the late 1830's and the 1840's. While the brass sunburst has the usual 8-pointed form, the eagle, applied to the center, is unusually small (1-3/8 by 1 in.) and gives every indication of having been originally designed as a cockade eagle at a somewhat earlier period.

This cap plate is a wider version of the 1833 dragoon design than most of the Militia plates of that style that were popular in the late 1830s and 1840s. While the brass sunburst still has the usual 8-pointed shape, the eagle in the center is unusually small (1-3/8 by 1 inch) and seems to have originally been designed as a cockade eagle from an earlier time.

CAP PLATE, C. 1836

USNM 60274-M (S-K 32). Figure 151.

USNM 60274-M (S-K 32). Figure 151.

Figure 151

Figure 151

This pattern of the 1833 dragoon eagle on a half-sunburst, struck in brass and silvered, was worn by the Washington [D.C.] Light Infantry [118] and possibly by other units of the period. Both the eagle and the half-sunburst were obviously stock items.

This design of the 1833 dragoon eagle on a half-sunburst, made in brass and coated in silver, was worn by the Washington [D.C.] Light Infantry [118] and likely by other units from that time. Both the eagle and the half-sunburst were clearly standard items.

(p. 78) CAP PLATE, REPUBLICAN BLUES, C. 1836

USNM 604606 (S-K 753). Figure 152.

USNM 604606 (S-K 753). Figure 152.

Figure 152

Figure 152

This silver-metal plate can be accurately identified by reading its devices. The center device is from the seal of the State of Georgia. During the period that the plate was worn, one of the best known of the State's Militia organizations was the Republican Blues—the "RB" on the plate—of Savannah.[119] The silver color of the plate also agrees with the other trimmings of the uniform of that unit.

This silver metal plate can be easily identified by looking at its symbols. The central symbol is from the seal of the State of Georgia. During the time the plate was worn, one of the most well-known militia groups in the state was the Republican Blues—the "RB" on the plate—from Savannah.[119] The silver color of the plate also matches the other details of that unit's uniform.

CAP PLATE, IRISH DRAGOONS, C. 1840

USNM 604605 (S-K 752). Figure 153.

USNM 604605 (S-K 752). Figure 153.

Figure 153

Figure 153

This three-quarter-sunburst plate with the monogram "I D" applied in silver is identical to one on a brass-bound dragoon cap in the national collections carrying in its crown the label "Irish Dragoons, Brooklyn, N.Y." (USNM 604691, S-K 837). It is typical of the two-piece sunburst-type plates and was probably worn until the 1850's. The plate was attached by means of two looped-wire fasteners that were run through holes in the helmet and secured by leather thongs.

This three-quarter-sunburst plate with the monogram "I D" in silver is the same as one on a brass-bound dragoon cap in the national collections, labeled "Irish Dragoons, Brooklyn, N.Y." (USNM 604691, S-K 837). It’s a typical example of the two-piece sunburst-type plates and was likely worn until the 1850s. The plate was attached using two looped-wire fasteners that were threaded through holes in the helmet and secured with leather straps.

CAP AND PLATE, LANCER TYPE, C. 1840

USNM 604688-M (S-K 834). Figure 154.

USNM 604688-M (S-K 834). Figure 154.

Figure 154

Figure 154

With no regulations but their own to restrain them, Militia organizations designed their uniforms to suit their fancies, although generally following the regulations (p. 79) for the Regulars. This often led to odd and unusual cap shapes and trimmings and bindings on clothing, and to somewhat garish horse furniture in in some mounted units.

With no rules except their own to limit them, militia groups created their uniforms however they liked, although they generally stuck to the standards (p. 79) for the regulars. This often resulted in strange and peculiar hat styles, along with various trimmings and decorations on their clothing, and somewhat flashy equipment for the horses in some mounted units.

The illustrated cap and plate is very similar to the ones worn by the Boston Light Infantry[120] about 1839-1840 except that the upper or "mortar board" portion is beige instead of red and the plate is a full instead of a three-quarter sunburst. The mortar board form is that introduced by the Polish lancers in Europe in the early years of the 19th century and worn by most European lancer regiments of the same period. Lancer units in the British Army adopted this type cap in 1816 when they were first converted from light dragoons.[121] The large, brass, eagle-on-sunburst plate was obviously patterned after the one prescribed for the Regular dragoons in 1833.

The illustrated cap and plate are very similar to those worn by the Boston Light Infantry[120] around 1839-1840, except that the upper or "mortar board" part is beige instead of red, and the plate features a full sunburst instead of a three-quarter design. The mortar board style was introduced by Polish lancers in Europe in the early 19th century and was worn by most European lancer regiments of the same time. Lancer units in the British Army adopted this type of cap in 1816 when they transitioned from light dragoons.[121] The large brass eagle-on-sunburst plate was clearly modeled after the one set for the Regular dragoons in 1833.

COCKADE EAGLE, INFANTRY, C. 1836

USNM 60377-M (S-K 133). Figure 155.

USNM 60377-M (S-K 133). Figure 155.

Figure 155

Figure 155

As an example of more than a dozen known variants of the eagle, this silver-on-copper specimen is illustrated to show the general form and size of Militia cockade eagles that became distinct types in the 1830's and continued until about 1851. All such eagles were obviously stock patterns.

As an example of over a dozen known variants of the eagle, this silver-on-copper piece is shown to illustrate the general form and size of Militia cockade eagles, which became distinct types in the 1830s and continued until around 1851. All of these eagles were clearly standard designs.

COCKADE EAGLE, C. 1836

USNM 604960-M (S-K 1104). Figure 156.

USNM 604960-M (S-K 1104). Figure 156.

Figure 156

Figure 156

This gold-embroidered cockade eagle with a wreath of silver lamé about its breast appears to have been patterned directly after the eagle on the 1833 Regular dragoon cap plate (see fig. 38). It possibly is one of a type worn by general officers of Militia. On this specimen, both the eye and mouth of the eagle are indicated with red thread.

This gold-embroidered eagle cockade, surrounded by a silver lamé wreath on its breast, seems to have been modeled directly after the eagle on the 1833 Regular dragoon cap plate (see fig. 38). It might be one of the styles that general officers of the Militia wore. In this example, both the eagle's eye and mouth are highlighted with red thread.

COCKADE EAGLE, C. 1836

USNM 604959-M (S-K 1103). Figure 157.

USNM 604959-M (S-K 1103). Figure 157.

Figure 157

Figure 157

This gold-embroidered eagle, with wings and tail of gold embroidery and gold sequins, was worn by staff and field officers, and possibly general officers, of Militia. A duplicate on an original chapeau is in the collections of the Maryland Historical Society in Baltimore, Maryland. Eagle ornaments such as this were generally centered on a round cloth cockade about 6 inches in diameter. The eagle's mouth is indicated by embroidery with red thread. Similar eagles of a smaller size are known on epaulets of the same period.

This gold-embroidered eagle, featuring wings and a tail made of gold embroidery and gold sequins, was worn by staff and field officers, and possibly generals, of the Militia. A duplicate of the original chapeau is in the collections of the Maryland Historical Society in Baltimore, Maryland. Eagle ornaments like this were usually placed in the center of a round cloth cockade about 6 inches in diameter. The eagle's mouth is shown with red thread embroidery. Similar, smaller eagles are known to exist on epaulets from the same period.

CAP PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 60451l-M (S-K 658). Figure 158.

USNM 60451l-M (S-K 658). Figure 158.

Figure 158

Figure 158

The flaming grenade, adopted by the Regulars in 1832 after long usage by the British and other foreign armies, was quickly adopted by the Militia. This specimen, of silver-on-copper, was worn as a cap plate either in conjunction with another device below it on the cap front or as a lone distinctive ornament. It cannot precisely be identified as an artillery plate, but since some Militia artillery units are definitely known to have worn silver buttons of the artillery pattern, such is highly probable. Also known in brass and in smaller sizes, it is a stock pattern.

The flaming grenade, used by the Regulars starting in 1832 after being in service with the British and other foreign armies for a while, was quickly adopted by the Militia. This version, made of silver on copper, was worn as a cap plate either alongside another insignia on the front of the cap or as a standalone distinctive ornament. It can't be specifically identified as an artillery plate, but since it's known that some Militia artillery units wore silver buttons of the artillery style, it's very likely. It also exists in brass and smaller sizes, and it's a standard pattern.

CAP PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604526 (S-K 673). Figure 159.

USNM 604526 (S-K 673). Figure 159.

Figure 159

Figure 159

Although this plate appears to be of possible French or British origin, close examination indicates that it is probably an American Militia device of the 1840's. Its looped-wire fasteners indicate that it is a cap plate. The design of the modified Napoleonic-type eagle is almost exactly that used in the 1833 Regular dragoon cap plate and other Militia plates; and the period of apparent manufacture coincides with the early use of the flaming grenade as an American device. Incorporating two devices common to the period, it would have been a stock pattern.

Although this plate seems to possibly come from France or Britain, a closer look shows that it’s likely an American Militia piece from the 1840s. Its looped-wire fasteners suggest that it’s a cap plate. The design of the altered Napoleonic-style eagle is almost identical to that used in the 1833 Regular dragoon cap plate and other Militia plates; and the time it was likely made lines up with the early use of the flaming grenade as an American symbol. Including two common elements from that time, it would have been a standard design.

CAP PLATE, ARTILLERY, C. 1840

USNM 60432-M (S-K 188). Figure 160.

USNM 60432-M (S-K 188). Figure 160.

Figure 160

Figure 160

The 1840 button for the Ordnance Corps bears a flaming grenade over crossed cannon, devices that date from 1832 and 1834 respectively. Consequently, it seems likely that this combination emerged as a stock pattern for Militia artillery early in the 1840's. This specimen, struck from a single piece of brass, is a copy of the French artillery device of the same period, and, while it is believed to be American, it may be a foreign insignia. Confusion arises in the case of foreign designs, for die sinkers often used as a model either an actual imported badge or a scale drawing of one.

The 1840 button for the Ordnance Corps features a flaming grenade over crossed cannons, designs that come from 1832 and 1834, respectively. Therefore, it seems likely that this combination became a standard pattern for Militia artillery early in the 1840s. This piece, made from a single piece of brass, is a replica of the French artillery insignia from the same time, and while it’s believed to be American, it could also be a foreign insignia. Confusion can happen with foreign designs, as die cutters often based their work on either an imported badge or a scaled drawing of one.

(p. 81) CAP PLATE, ARTILLERY, C. 1840

USNM 604548-M (S-K 695). Figure 161.

USNM 604548-M (S-K 695). Figure 161.

Figure 161

Figure 161

This is a variation of the pattern of the preceding specimen in which silver-metal devices have been placed on a small, gilt, half-sunburst plate. This was probably a stock pattern available to any Militia organization beginning about 1840 and worn for the next 20 or 30 years.

This is a variation of the pattern from the previous example where silver metal pieces have been added to a small, gold-colored half-sunburst plate. This was likely a standard design that any militia organization could use starting around 1840 and wore for the next 20 to 30 years.

CAP PLATE, SOUTH CAROLINA, C. 1840

USNM 604533-M (S-K 680). Figure 162.

USNM 604533-M (S-K 680). Figure 162.

Figure 162

Figure 162

The palmetto of South Carolina in outline form first appeared as a large cap ornament about 1840, after having been worn in smaller size as a cockade ornament and on the side of dragoon caps. A Huddy and Duval print shows it on the caps of the DeKalb Rifle Guards of Camden, South Carolina.[122] The illustrated specimen was worn into the 1850's, and it is highly probable that some South Carolina troops wore plates such as this in the early days of the Civil War.

The palmetto of South Carolina first appeared in outline form as a large cap ornament around 1840, after being used in a smaller size as a cockade ornament and on the side of dragoon caps. A print by Huddy and Duval shows it on the caps of the DeKalb Rifle Guards from Camden, South Carolina.[122] The illustrated example was worn into the 1850s, and it's very likely that some South Carolina troops wore plates like this in the early days of the Civil War.

The palmetto was adopted as the principal heraldic device of South Carolina in commemoration of the defeat of Admiral Sir Peter Parker's fleet by the garrison of Sullivan's Island under Col. William Moultrie in June 1776. The defenses of the island were constructed primarily of palmetto logs. The devices comprising this brass plate are all taken from the state seal, including the mottos Animis Opibusque Parati and Dum Spiro Spero Spes. The date "1776" alludes to the year of Moultrie's victory and not to the organization date of any particular unit.

The palmetto was chosen as the main symbol of South Carolina to commemorate the defeat of Admiral Sir Peter Parker's fleet by the garrison at Sullivan's Island, led by Col. William Moultrie, in June 1776. The defenses of the island were mainly built from palmetto logs. The designs on this brass plate are all derived from the state seal, including the mottos Animis Opibusque Parati and Dum Spiro Spero Spes. The date "1776" refers to the year of Moultrie's victory and not to the founding date of any specific unit.

CAP PLATE, SOUTH CAROLINA, C. 1840

USNM 604532-M (S-K 679). Figure 163.

USNM 604532-M (S-K 679). Figure 163.

Figure 163

Figure 163

Struck from a different die, with broader fronds and a wider base, this brass plate is of the same period as the preceding one.

Struck from a different mold, with broader leaves and a wider base, this brass plate is from the same period as the one before it.

CAP PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 60295-M (S-K 53). Figure 164.

USNM 60295-M (S-K 53). Figure 164.

Figure 164

Figure 164

This grenadier-type plate, struck in brass, is one of the most beautiful examples of the die maker's art in the national collections. On a sunburst-over-clouds (p. 82) background is an eagle grasping the top of the Federal shield superimposed on panoply of arms and colors. The national motto is on a ribbon below. Certainly not from a stock pattern, this plate obviously was made for a specific Militia unit of considerable affluence. Three simple wire fasteners soldered to the reverse provide means of attachment.

This grenadier-style plate, made of brass, is one of the most stunning examples of craftsmanship in the national collections. Set against a sunburst-over-clouds (p. 82) background, there's an eagle holding the top of the Federal shield, layered over a display of arms and colors. The national motto appears on a ribbon below. Definitely not from a standard design, this plate was clearly made for a specific Militia unit of significant wealth. Three simple wire fasteners soldered to the back provide a means of attachment.

This specimen is one of the scarce examples of military plates bearing the maker's name "BALE," which may be seen just above the raised lower edge and below the "UNUM." This was probably Thomas Bale of New York who is first listed in New York directories, in 1832, as an engraver at 68 Nassau Street. The 1842 directory lists him as a die sinker at the same address in partnership with a Frederick B. Smith. He is last listed in 1851.

This piece is one of the rare military plates that has the maker's name "BALE" visible just above the raised lower edge and below the "UNUM." This likely refers to Thomas Bale from New York, who first appears in New York directories in 1832 as an engraver located at 68 Nassau Street. The 1842 directory shows him as a die sinker at the same address,

CAP AND CAP PLATE, 1ST ARTILLERY, PENNSYLVANIA, C. 1840

USNM 604672 (S-K 819). Figure 165.

USNM 604672 (S-K 819). Figure 165.

Figure 165

Figure 165

The plate on this cap uses only the shield of the Pennsylvania seal without crest or supporters. It is surrounded at the sides and bottom with a wreath carrying a ribbon with the unit designation "first artily." Equally interesting and unusual is the small separate insignia at the pompon socket. It is based on the 1840 flaming grenade ordnance device with crossed cannon superimposed.

The plate on this cap features just the shield from the Pennsylvania seal, omitting the crest and supporters. It’s bordered on the sides and bottom by a wreath that has a ribbon displaying the unit designation "first artillery." Also noteworthy and unique is the small separate insignia at the pompon socket. It’s designed after the 1840 flaming grenade ordnance device, which has crossed cannons overlaid.

COCKADE EAGLE, C. 1840

USNM 60394-M (S-K 150). Figure 166.

USNM 60394-M (S-K 150). Figure 166.

Figure 166

Figure 166

This eagle is of a rather odd design, and the five arrows in its left talon is an even more unusual variation. (p. 83) It is believed to be a cockade eagle because of its form and size, but it may well have been used elsewhere on the person as a piece of uniform insignia.

This eagle has a pretty unique design, and the five arrows in its left claw are an even stranger twist. (p. 83) It's thought to be a cockade eagle due to its shape and size, but it could also have been worn elsewhere on the uniform as an insignia.

CHAPEAU COCKADE, STATE FENCIBLES (PENNSYLVANIA), C. 1840

USNM 60259-M (S-K 17). Figure 167.

USNM 60259-M (S-K 17). Figure 167.

Figure 167

Figure 167

The State Fencibles of Philadelphia were originally organized as "Sea Fencibles" in 1812 for duty at the port of Philadelphia. This cockade, with brass eagle, was first worn about 1840 and it continued in use for many years thereafter. Dates incorporated as parts of devices are generally the original organizational dates of the units concerned—as is the case in this instance—and bear no necessary relation to the age of the badges. Some Militia cap plates bear the date "1776," and there are waist-belt plates bearing organization dates of 100 years earlier than the dates at which the plates were made.

The State Fencibles of Philadelphia were initially formed as "Sea Fencibles" in 1812 to serve at the port of Philadelphia. This cockade, featuring a brass eagle, was first worn around 1840 and continued to be used for many years after. The dates included in the designs typically represent the original formation dates of the units, as is the case here, and do not necessarily correspond to the age of the badges. Some Militia cap plates include the date "1776," and there are waist-belt plates that have organizational dates from 100 years earlier than when the plates were actually made.

¶ The transition to composite plates in the late 1830's was a tremendous step forward in the field of military ornament. Handsome insignia could be manufactured less expensively and individual units were able to have plates distinctive to themselves at relatively low cost; however, only gold and silver colors could be used. In the mid-1840's there was introduced a new manufacturing technique which opened this field even wider. In this innovation, various stock patterns were struck with a round center as a part of the design. In either the initial strike, or a second, this round center was punched out, leaving a hole. Then pieces of colored leather or painted tin, carrying distinctive numerals, letters, monograms, or other devices were affixed to the reverse of the plate, in effect filling the hole. Although this added a step in manufacture, it permitted the incorporation of bright colors, which added zest and sparkle to the finished product. Such plates remained popular until the 1890's, and a few are still worn on the full-dress caps of some units. This type of insignia came into use at the time when many of the independent companies (p. 84) of the larger states, such as New York and Pennsylvania, were starting to become elements of regiments and brigades within the over-all Militia structure of the state, thus the use of distinctive numbers and/or letters on the badges. Many of these units, however, retained their original designation[123] and continued to wear insignia distinctive to themselves on full-dress uniforms.

¶ The shift to composite plates in the late 1830s was a major advancement in military decoration. Attractive insignia could be produced at a lower cost, allowing individual units to have unique plates without spending a lot; however, they could only be made in gold and silver colors. In the mid-1840s, a new manufacturing technique emerged that expanded options even further. This innovation involved striking various stock patterns with a circular center as part of the design. In either the first strike or a second one, this circular center was punched out, creating a hole. Then, pieces of colored leather or painted tin, featuring unique numbers, letters, monograms, or other designs, were attached to the back of the plate, effectively filling the hole. Although this added an extra step in production, it allowed for the use of bright colors, adding vibrancy and highlights to the finished product. These plates remained popular until the 1890s, and a few are still worn on the full-dress caps of some units. This type of insignia came into use when many independent companies from larger states, like New York and Pennsylvania, were beginning to join regiments and brigades within the state's overall Militia structure, leading to the use of distinct numbers and/or letters on the badges. Many of these units, however, kept their original name[123] and continued to wear unique insignia on their full-dress uniforms.

CAP PLATE, 1845-1850

USNM 604559-M (S-K 706). Figure 168.

USNM 604559-M (S-K 706). Figure 168.

Figure 168

Figure 168

The first of the stock patterns, with basic wreath and 8-pointed starlike sunburst, has the numeral "1" on black leather as a center device. Other specimens in the national collections have single numerals, single letters, branch of service devices, and state coats of arms. This plate, and those following, were worn through the 1850's on the dress cap copied after the pattern adopted for the Regular Establishment in 1851. It is struck in brass.

The first of the stock patterns, featuring a simple wreath and an 8-pointed starburst, has the number "1" on black leather as the centerpiece. Other examples in national collections have single numbers, single letters, branch insignia, and state coats of arms. This plate, along with the others that follow, was worn throughout the 1850s on the dress cap modeled after the design adopted for the Regular Establishment in 1851. It is made of brass.

CAP PLATE, 1845-1850

USNM 604617-M (S-K 764). Figure 169.

USNM 604617-M (S-K 764). Figure 169.

Figure 169

Figure 169

This stock pattern, in brass, is very definitely military in composition, employing cannon and flag-staff spearheads radiating from a beaded center and superimposed on a sunburst background. The metal letter "1" is backed with black leather.

This brass stock pattern is clearly military in design, featuring cannon and flagstaff spearheads that radiate from a beaded center, all set against a sunburst background. The metal letter "1" is backed with black leather.

(p. 85) CAP AND CAP PLATE, ALBANY BURGESSES CORPS, C. 1851

USNM 604681-M (S-K 827). Figure 170.

USNM 604681-M (S-K 827). Figure 170.

Figure 170

Figure 170

This unusually ornate and distinctive plate is that of the Albany [New York] Burgesses Corps that was founded, as stated on the plate itself, October 8, 1833. The arms and the motto "ASSIDUITY", appearing above the ribbon with the letters "A B C," are those of the city of Albany.

This uniquely designed and striking plate belongs to the Albany [New York] Burgesses Corps, established, as noted on the plate, on October 8, 1833. The coat of arms and the motto "Diligence", which appear above the ribbon with the letters "A B C," represent the city of Albany.

CAP AND CAP PLATE, RIFLES, C. 1851

USNM 604666-M (S-K 813). Figure 171.

USNM 604666-M (S-K 813). Figure 171.

Figure 171

Figure 171

The original buttons on the sides of this cap have the eagle with the letter "R" (used by both Regulars and Militia) on the shield. The brass plate proper, however, includes no device indicative of any particular branch of service; combining flags and a Federal (p. 86) shield surmounted by an eagle, it may well have been a stock pattern.

The original buttons on the sides of this cap feature an eagle with the letter "R" (used by both Regulars and Militia) on the shield. However, the brass plate itself doesn’t show any symbols representing a specific branch of service; with flags and a Federal (p. 86) shield topped by an eagle, it might have been a standard design.

CAP PLATE, C. 1850(?)

USNM 604551 (S-K 698). Figure 172.

USNM 604551 (S-K 698). Figure 172.

Figure 172

Figure 172

The type and form of this eagle plate give no clue to its age, or to the identity of the unit that wore it other than the numeral "1" in the eagle's beak and the letter "E" in the shield. It is a type more apt to have been made about 1850 than later. The eagle is struck in brass, and the stippled inner portion of the shield, product of a separate strike, is soldered in place; thus, the plate proper must be considered a stock pattern.

The design and shape of this eagle plate don’t reveal anything about its age or the unit that wore it, except for the numeral "1" in the eagle's beak and the letter "E" in the shield. It’s more likely that this type was made around 1850 rather than later. The eagle is made of brass, and the dotted inner part of the shield, created from a separate strike, is soldered in place; therefore, the plate itself should be seen as a standard pattern.

(p. 87) CAP PLATE, C. 1850(?)

USNM 604552-M (S-K 699). Figure 173.

USNM 604552-M (S-K 699). Figure 173.

Figure 173

Figure 173

A companion piece to the preceding plate, this specimen differs in that the letters "R G" and their stippled background are struck integrally with the plate proper—indicating that two dies were combined for a single strike—and in that the shield, ribbon, and numeral "1" have been silvered.

A companion piece to the previous plate, this specimen differs in that the letters "R G" and their dotted background are made together with the plate itself—showing that two dies were used for a single strike—and that the shield, ribbon, and the number "1" have been silvered.

CAP PLATE, 10TH REGIMENT, MASSACHUSETTS VOLUNTEER MILITIA, C. 1850

USNM 60358-M (S-K 114). Figure 174.

USNM 60358-M (S-K 114). Figure 174.

Figure 174

Figure 174

This plate is of a type form worn on Militia dress caps prior to the Civil War. There is little doubt that plates such as this continued in use for several decades after their initial appearance. This brass specimen, surmounted by elements of the Massachusetts seal, is struck as a stock pattern for Massachusetts troops with the center left blank. The numeral "10" is applied to a black-painted metal disk affixed with simple wire fasteners.

This plate is a type worn on Militia dress caps before the Civil War. There's no doubt that plates like this were still in use for several decades after they first appeared. This brass example, featuring parts of the Massachusetts seal, is made as a standard design for Massachusetts troops, with the center left blank. The numeral "10" is added to a black-painted metal disk attached with simple wire fasteners.

CAP PLATE, GEORGIA, C. 1850

USNM 604545-M (S-K 692). Figure 175.

USNM 604545-M (S-K 692). Figure 175.

Figure 175

Figure 175

This plate and the one following are of Militia types worn on caps in the 1850's and perhaps earlier. Such plates are known to have been in use with little or no change almost to the present day on military school dress shakos and dress caps worn by some National Guard units. The plate proper, which is of brass, is the well-known half-sunburst device so popular in the 1830's and 1840's. The Georgia state seal, also in brass, is applied with wire fasteners. The plate is dated later than a similar one of the Republican Blues (fig. 152) because of the "feel" of the piece and the fact that it cannot be ascribed to a particular unit whose existence can be dated.

This plate and the one after it are of Militia types worn on caps in the 1850s and possibly even earlier. These plates have been used with little to no changes almost up to the present day on military school dress shakos and dress caps worn by some National Guard units. The main plate, made of brass, features the well-known half-sunburst design that was very popular in the 1830s and 1840s. The Georgia state seal, also in brass, is attached with wire fasteners. This plate is dated later than a similar one from the Republican Blues (fig. 152) because of its "feel" and the fact that it cannot be linked to a specific unit with a verifiable timeline.

CAP PLATE, VIRGINIA, C. 1850

USNM 604547-M (S-K 694). Figure 176.

USNM 604547-M (S-K 694). Figure 176.

Figure 176

Figure 176

This plate differs from the preceding one only in that it substitutes the coat of arms of Virginia for that of Georgia. The backgrounds, although very similar, are products of different dies.

This plate is different from the previous one only in that it replaces the coat of arms of Virginia with that of Georgia. The backgrounds, while quite similar, come from different dies.

(p. 88) Shoulder-Belt and Waist-Belt Plates

WAIST-BELT PLATE, 1ST MARINE ARTILLERY, 1813

USNM 60323-M (S-K 79). Figure 177.

USNM 60323-M (S-K 79). Figure 177.

Figure 177

Figure 177

Undoubtedly one of the most interesting of all the Militia plates of the War of 1812 period is this rectangular one worn by John S. Stiles of (as indicated by the engraving) the "First Marine Artillery of the Union." Engraved in brass, it bears an unusual combination of military and naval devices—the familiar eagle-on-cannon of the Regular artillery and the eagle with oval shield that appears on naval officers' buttons of the period.[124] Actually, the devices befit the character of the organization. The following quotation from Niles Weekly Register of Baltimore, June 26, 1813, tells something of the unit:

Undoubtedly, one of the most interesting militia plates from the War of 1812 period is this rectangular one worn by John S. Stiles of the "First Marine Artillery of the Union," as indicated by the engraving. Made of brass, it features a unique blend of military and naval symbols—the well-known eagle-on-cannon of the Regular artillery and the eagle with an oval shield that shows up on naval officers' buttons from that time.[124] These symbols really suit the nature of the organization. The following quote from Niles Weekly Register of Baltimore, June 26, 1813, provides some insight into the unit:

The First Marine Artillery of the Union, an association of the masters and mates of vessels in Baltimore, about 170 strong all told, assembled on Sunday last and proceeded to the Rev. Mr. Glendy's church in full uniform, where they received an address suited to the occasion; which, as usual, done honor to the head and heart to the reverend orator. We cannot pass over this pleasant incident without observing that the members of this invaluable corps are they who, of all other classes of society, feel the burthens and privations of the war.

The First Marine Artillery of the Union, a group of ship captains and officers from Baltimore, around 170 members in total, gathered last Sunday and went to Rev. Mr. Glendy's church in full uniform, where they heard a speech fitting for the occasion, which, as always, honored the intellect and compassion of the reverend speaker. We can't overlook this nice event without mentioning that the members of this essential group are the ones, more than any other social class, who truly experience the burdens and hardships of the war.

Obviously, this organization was one of the state fencible units enlisted for defense only, but little else is known about it. In 1814 there was in Baltimore, a Corps of Marine Artillery commanded by a Capt. George Stiles. The roster of this unit, however, (p. 89) does not include the name John S. Stiles. Other records do indicate that a Lt. John S. Stiles commanded a section of the Baltimore Union Artillery at the Battle of North Point in 1814.[125] It is probable that John Stiles, originally a member of the 1st Marine Artillery of the Union had transferred his commission to the Baltimore Union Artillery.

Obviously, this organization was one of the state military units enlisted for defense only, but not much else is known about it. In 1814, there was a Corps of Marine Artillery in Baltimore led by Captain George Stiles. However, the roster of this unit (p. 89) does not include the name John S. Stiles. Other records show that Lieutenant John S. Stiles commanded a section of the Baltimore Union Artillery at the Battle of North Point in 1814.[125] It's likely that John Stiles, originally a member of the 1st Marine Artillery of the Union, had transferred his commission to the Baltimore Union Artillery.

¶ An example of Militia officers' shoulder-belt plates of the period 1812-1816 is a solid silver oval plate (fig. 178) engraved with an eagle and elements of the arms of Massachusetts within a shield suspended from the eagle's neck. Being silver, the plate probably was worn by infantry or possibly dragoons. Many such (p. 90) plates were locally made, as was this one, and examination of a number of specimens gives reason to believe that many were made by rolling out large silver coins into thin ovals, which were then engraved and fitted with fasteners on the reverse. The fasteners on all pieces studied indicate that the plates were intended to be ornamental rather than functional.

¶ An example of militia officers' shoulder-belt plates from the period 1812-1816 is a solid silver oval plate (fig. 178) engraved with an eagle and elements of the Massachusetts coat of arms within a shield hanging from the eagle's neck. Since it's made of silver, the plate was probably worn by infantry or possibly dragoons. Many of these (p. 90) plates were made locally, including this one, and looking at several examples suggests that many were crafted by rolling out large silver coins into thin ovals, which were then engraved and fitted with fasteners on the back. The fasteners on all the pieces examined indicate that the plates were meant to be decorative rather than functional.

Figure 178.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

Figure 178.—Specimen in Campbell collection.

In the Pennsylvania State Museum there is a similar oval plate that was worn by Col. Philip Spengler of that State's Militia in 1812-1816. Ornamented with an eagle, with the initials "PS" within an oval below, it generally follows the construction of the illustrated plate, differing only slightly in size. Since plates of this general type were made locally by hand, each is unique in itself. Identification must depend upon an interpretation of the devices engraved on the face. The initials of the officer for whom the plate was made are often included.

In the Pennsylvania State Museum, there is a similar oval plate that was worn by Col. Philip Spengler of the state militia from 1812 to 1816. Decorated with an eagle and the initials "PS" inside an oval below, it mostly resembles the illustrated plate, differing only slightly in size. Since plates of this type were made locally by hand, each one is unique. Identification must rely on interpreting the designs engraved on the surface. The initials of the officer for whom the plate was created are often included.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1812

USNM 604310-M (S-K 466). Figure 179.

USNM 604310-M (S-K 466). Figure 179.

Figure 179

Figure 179

A second example of a Militia officer's plate is this engraved brass specimen with the design placed along the longer axis of the oval. Since there probably were many "Volunteer Rifle Companies," it is impossible to determine precisely which one wore this plate. The initials of the officer may be read either "I. B." or "J. B.," for many of the early-19th-century engravers used the forms of the letters "I" and "J" interchangeably. The two small hooks on the reverse indicate that the plate was for a shoulder belt rather than for a waist belt, and that it was ornamental rather than functional.

A second example of a Militia officer's plate is this engraved brass piece with the design positioned along the longer side of the oval. Since there were likely many "Volunteer Rifle Companies," it’s impossible to identify exactly which one wore this plate. The initials of the officer can be read as either "I. B." or "J.B." because many early-19th-century engravers used the letters "I" and "J" interchangeably. The two small hooks on the back show that the plate was made for a shoulder belt rather than a waist belt, and that it was decorative rather than practical.

SHOULDER-BELT BUCKLE, C. 1812(?)

USNM 60325-M (S-K 81). Figure 180.

USNM 60325-M (S-K 81). Figure 180.

Figure 180

Figure 180

This brass buckle, obviously made for a sword hanger, has an eagle in flight above, a 13-star flag below, and four 5-pointed stars on either side. The spearhead on the pike of the flag is definitely of military design, and, in the absence of nautical devices in the engraving, the buckle must be considered an army item.

This brass buckle, clearly designed for a sword hanger, features an eagle in flight above, a 13-star flag below, and four 5-pointed stars on each side. The spearhead on the flag's pike is unmistakably military in style, and since there are no nautical symbols in the engraving, the buckle should be regarded as an army piece.

ORNAMENTED WAIST-BELT PLATE, 1812-1825(?)

USNM 604121-M (S-K 278). Figure 181.

USNM 604121-M (S-K 278). Figure 181.

Figure 181

Figure 181

Cast in silver and then carefully finished, this rectangular plate with beveled edge is one of the most ornate and beautiful known. In the center is an officer's marquee with an eagle, wings spread, perched on top. In front of the marquee are a field piece with bombs, cannon balls, and drum; the whole on grassy ground and superimposed on a trophy of colors and bayonetted muskets. The canton of one color has, instead of stars, an eagle with a shield on (p. 91) its breast and a ribbon in its beak. It has been suggested that the eagle-in-canton flag would tend to date the piece after 1820 when many Militia units had the design in its colors;[126] however, flags of such design are known to have been used as early as the last year of the Revolution.[127] In addition, the "feel" of the specimen is early, and it is included here as a possible Militia dragoon officer's plate since the dragoons of the War of 1812 period generally wore their swords attached to a waist belt rather than to a shoulder belt.

Cast in silver and carefully finished, this rectangular plate with a beveled edge is one of the most ornate and beautiful known. In the center is an officer's marquee with an eagle, wings spread, perched on top. In front of the marquee are a field piece with bombs, cannonballs, and a drum; all set on grassy ground and layered over a trophy of colors and bayonetted muskets. Instead of stars, the canton of one color features an eagle with a shield on its breast and a ribbon in its beak. It has been suggested that the eagle-in-canton flag would date the piece after 1820, when many Militia units had this design in their colors; however, flags of such design are known to have been used as early as the last year of the Revolution. Additionally, the overall "feel" of the specimen is early, and it is included here as a possible Militia dragoon officer's plate since the dragoons of the War of 1812 period typically wore their swords attached to a waist belt rather than a shoulder belt.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, INFANTRY, 1814-1825(?)

USNM 60449-M (S-K 205). Figure 182.

USNM 60449-M (S-K 205). Figure 182.

Figure 182

Figure 182

This plate is typical of the early waist-belt plates, which generally were more square than rectangular. It bears the over-all design of the 1814-1821 series of "common" cap plates. Struck in copper and silvered, it would have been appropriate for either infantry or dragoons, as both wore "white metal" trimmings during this period. There are as many die variations known for this type belt plate as for the matching cap plates.

This plate is typical of the early waist-belt plates, which were usually more square than rectangular. It features the overall design of the 1814-1821 series of "common" cap plates. Made from copper and silvered, it would have been suitable for either infantry or dragoons, as both used "white metal" trimmings during this time. There are as many die variations known for this type of belt plate as for the matching cap plates.

The wide latitude allowed officers in selecting their own insignia makes it quite possible that this design was worn by some officers of the Regular Establishment, particularly those in the high-numbered regiments, which were organized during the course of the War of 1812. A third use of this basic design is indicated by a museum specimen at Fort Ticonderoga, N.Y.: cut into its outline form, it was worn on the side of Militia dragoon caps.

The freedom given to officers in choosing their own insignia makes it likely that some officers in the Regular Establishment, especially those in the higher-numbered regiments formed during the War of 1812, wore this design. A third use of this basic design is shown by a museum piece at Fort Ticonderoga, NY: shaped into its outline, it was worn on the side of Militia dragoon caps.

(p. 92) WAIST-BELT PLATE, INFANTRY, 1814-1825(?)

USNM 60451-M (S-K 207). Figure 183.

USNM 60451-M (S-K 207). Figure 183.

Figure 183

Figure 183

This brass plate is one of several similar examples made of both brass and silvered copper that differ only in small die variations and the use of either 5-pointed or 6-pointed stars. The arc of 17 stars in this specimen may or may not be significant, because there were 17 states in the Union from 1802 until 1812 when Louisiana was admitted. Not until 1816 did the 19th state, Indiana, come into the Union. After thinking in terms of and working with 17 stars for a 10-year period, die sinkers may well have overlooked the inclusion of a star for Louisiana. Buttons for the Regular rifles made after 1812 but before 1821 show an arc of 17 stars.[128] As in the case of the preceding plate, there is a good possibility that this one was worn by Regular officers in 1814-1821. It is also probable that the pattern was made and sold to Militia for many years after 1821.

This brass plate is one of several similar ones made of both brass and silvered copper, differing only in minor die variations and the use of either 5-pointed or 6-pointed stars. The arc of 17 stars on this piece may or may not be significant, since there were 17 states in the Union from 1802 until 1812 when Louisiana was added. It wasn't until 1816 that Indiana became the 19th state. After working with 17 stars for a decade, die sinkers might have overlooked adding a star for Louisiana. Buttons for the Regular rifles made after 1812 but before 1821 also show an arc of 17 stars.[128] Like the previous plate, there's a good chance this one was worn by Regular officers from 1814 to 1821. It's also likely that the pattern was made and sold to the Militia for many years after 1821.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, MILITIA ARTILLERY, C. 1821-1840(?)

USNM 60453-M (S-K 209). Figure 184.

USNM 60453-M (S-K 209). Figure 184.

Figure 184

Figure 184

While this plate could have been worn by an officer of the Regular artillery in the period 1814-1821 when uniform regulations were vague and seldom enforced, it is more probable that it was a Militia item of about 1821-1835. The reason for this is that the eagle-on-cannon device was adopted quickly by Militia units when it was discarded by the Regulars in 1821, and the over-all design of the plate itself follows the pattern adopted by the Regulars in 1821 (see fig. 68). Several artillery organizations of the Massachusetts Militia wore the discarded button pattern (eagle-on-cannon with the word "Corps" below) until the 1840's,[129] and this plate would have been an ideal match.

While this plate could have been worn by an officer in the Regular artillery between 1814 and 1821, when uniform rules were unclear and rarely enforced, it’s more likely that it was a Militia item from around 1821 to 1835. This is because the eagle-on-cannon design was quickly adopted by Militia units after the Regulars stopped using it in 1821, and the overall design of the plate aligns with the pattern that the Regulars adopted in 1821 (see fig. 68). Several artillery organizations of the Massachusetts Militia used the discarded button design (eagle-on-cannon with the word "Corps" below) until the 1840s,[129] and this plate would have been a perfect fit.

The whole is cast in brass, the inner ring rather crudely so. The outer ring is embossed with zig-zag fretwork enclosing a circle of 5-pointed stars; the rectangular belt attachments have a floral design.

The entire piece is made of brass, with the inner ring being somewhat rough. The outer ring has zig-zag patterns surrounding a circle of 5-pointed stars, and the rectangular belt attachments feature a floral design.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, MAINE, C. 1821

USNM 604123 (S-K 279). Figure 185.

USNM 604123 (S-K 279). Figure 185.

Figure 185

Figure 185

This plate, struck in copper, contains the basic devices of the State of Maine seal enclosed by a curled ribbon border embellished with 5-pointed stars. The specimen is more square than rectangular, a characteristic of waist-belt plates of the early 1800's. It was probably worn by Maine Militia no later than the 1820's, possibly a few years earlier. The method of attachment also is indicative of this early period: the heavy vertical wire is brazed to one end of the reverse, and the L-shaped tongue to the other. This plate obviously was a stock pattern.

This plate, made of copper, features the main designs of the State of Maine seal surrounded by a curled ribbon border decorated with five-pointed stars. The piece is more square than rectangular, which is typical of waist-belt plates from the early 1800s. It was likely worn by the Maine Militia no later than the 1820s, possibly a few years earlier. The way it’s attached also suggests this early period: a heavy vertical wire is brazed to one end on the back, and an L-shaped tongue is attached to the other. This plate clearly follows a standard pattern.

(p. 93) WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1830

USNM 60329-M (S-K 85). Figure 186.

USNM 60329-M (S-K 85). Figure 186.

Figure 186

Figure 186

This plate, cast in brass, is typical of the small plates, both round and rectangular, that were worn with light-weight, full-dress staff swords. It is an example of the early, hand-made, bench-assembled types. The outer ring carries the wreath typical of the period, while the inner ring carries the eagle with its head to the right, shield on breast, arrows in left talon, and olive branch in right talon. The whole lies within a ring of 13 5-pointed stars; the uppermost five stars are mixed with a sunburst rising from the eagle's wings.

This brass plate is typical of the small plates, both round and rectangular, that were worn with lightweight, full-dress staff swords. It represents the early, handmade, bench-assembled designs. The outer ring features a wreath that was common for the time, while the inner ring shows an eagle facing to the right, with a shield on its chest, arrows in its left talon, and an olive branch in its right talon. The entire design is surrounded by a ring of 13 five-pointed stars; the top five stars are combined with a sunburst rising from the eagle's wings.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1821(?)-1830

USNM 60466-M (S-K 222). Figure 187.

USNM 60466-M (S-K 222). Figure 187.

Figure 187

Figure 187

This brass, bench-assembled plate is similar to the Regular artillery belt plate of 1816 (fig. 56) in that the design on the inner ring is struck with a series of separate hand-held dies on a piece of blank round stock. The floral design on the belt attachments is cast. In many of the early bench-made plates, the final assemblyman marked the matching pairs so that they could readily be re-paired after buffing and plating. In this specimen, each ring bears the numeral XXVIII.

This brass plate, assembled by hand, is similar to the Regular artillery belt plate from 1816 (fig. 56) in that the design on the inner ring is stamped using a series of individual hand-held dies on a piece of round stock. The floral design on the belt attachments is cast. In many of the early handmade plates, the final assembler marked the matching pairs to make it easier to re-pair them after buffing and plating. In this example, each ring has the numeral XXVIII.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, NEW YORK, C. 1830

USNM 60467-M (S-K 223). Figure 188.

USNM 60467-M (S-K 223). Figure 188.

Figure 188

Figure 188

This plate, with the center ring struck in medium brass and the belt attachment cast, was worn by Militia of New York State, as indicated by the eagle-on-half-globe device taken from that state's seal. Of brass, it is assigned to the artillery. The quality of the belt to which it is attached and the ornateness of the plate itself indicate that it was made for an officer. The left-hand belt attachment is missing.

This plate, featuring a center ring made of medium brass and a cast belt attachment, was worn by the New York State Militia, as shown by the eagle on a half-globe design taken from the state seal. Made of brass, it is designated for artillery use. The quality of the belt it’s attached to and the decorative style of the plate suggest it was created for an officer. The left-hand belt attachment is missing.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1830

USNM 60470-M (S-K 226). Figure 189.

USNM 60470-M (S-K 226). Figure 189.

Figure 189

Figure 189

This small, cast-brass plate is another example of the plates made for social or full-dress wear with the light-weight staff sword. The design on the inner ring is unusual in that the eagle, with upraised wings, is standing on the Federal shield. The plate is a bench-made product, with the inner and outer rings (p. 94) bearing the numeral VII. It was very probably a stock pattern for officers.

This small, cast-brass plate is another example of the plates made for social or full-dress wear with a lightweight staff sword. The design on the inner ring is unique because the eagle, with its wings raised, is standing on the Federal shield. The plate is a bench-made product, with the inner and outer rings (p. 94) displaying the numeral VII. It was most likely a standard pattern for officers.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1836

USNM 60414-M (S-K 300). Figure 190.

USNM 60414-M (S-K 300). Figure 190.

Figure 190

Figure 190

Rather unusual in construction, this small silver-on-copper rectangular plate was struck in thin metal. Two broad tongues, for attachment to a belt, are inserted in the rear; and the reverse is filled with lead to imbed the fasteners. The eagle design is very similar to the one prescribed for the caps of the Regular Establishment in 1821, although somewhat reduced in size. The general lack of finish and polish in construction indicates that the specimen was probably the product of an inexperienced and small-scale manufacturer.

Rather unusual in design, this small silver-on-copper rectangular plate was made from thin metal. Two wide tabs for attaching it to a belt are added at the back, and the backside is filled with lead to secure the fasteners. The eagle design closely resembles the one required for the caps of the Regular Establishment in 1821, although it's somewhat smaller. The overall lack of refinement and polish in its construction suggests that this piece was likely made by an inexperienced and small-scale manufacturer.

OFFICER'S WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1837

USNM 60326-M (S-K 82). Figure 191.

USNM 60326-M (S-K 82). Figure 191.

Figure 191

Figure 191

This unusually large plate, which is struck in medium brass and with the edges crimped over a heavier piece of brass backing, is believed to be an officer's plate because of its size, gilt finish, and over-all ornate design. Within a floral and star pattern border, the specimen is dominated by an eagle, on a sunburst background, that holds in its left talon five arrows with points inward; above are 25 stars and an edge of clouds above. Arrows held with points inward are usually considered indicative of the general period (p. 95) 1832-1836. If the number of stars is of any significance, such dating would be correct, as the canton of the National Colors contained 25 stars from 1836 to 1837. The central design used without the border is also known in smaller, more standard sized plates. The design is a stock pattern. This type plate is also known in both brass and silver.

This unusually large plate, made of medium brass with crimped edges over a heavier brass backing, is thought to be an officer's plate because of its size, gold finish, and overall decorative design. In a border of floral and star patterns, the plate features a large eagle on a sunburst background, clutching five arrows with points facing inward in its left talon; above it are 25 stars and a cloud edge. Arrows with points aimed inward are generally considered indicative of the period (p. 95) 1832-1836. If the number of stars is significant, that dating would be accurate since the canton of the National Colors had 25 stars from 1836 to 1837. The central design, used without the border, is also known in smaller, more standard-sized plates. This design is a common pattern. This type of plate is also found in both brass and silver.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, WASHINGTON GRAYS, C. 1835

USNM 604348-M (S-K 504). Figure 192.

USNM 604348-M (S-K 504). Figure 192.

Figure 192

Figure 192

This may well be a companion piece to the diamond-shaped cap plate ascribed to the Washington Greys[130] of Philadelphia (see fig. 139). In any case, the two appear to have been struck from the same die. It may also have been worn by the Washington Greys of Reading, Pennsylvania, or by another company of the same designation. The specimen is struck in thin brass with a tin backing applied before the strike and the edges crimped over the reverse. Three soldered copper-wire staples provide means of attachment.

This might be a companion piece to the diamond-shaped cap plate linked to the Washington Greys[130] of Philadelphia (see fig. 139). In any case, the two seem to have been created from the same die. It may also have been worn by the Washington Greys of Reading, Pennsylvania, or by another group with the same name. The item is made from thin brass with a tin backing applied before it was struck, and the edges are crimped over the back. Three soldered copper-wire staples provide a way to attach it.

¶ Militia organizations generally modeled their uniforms rather closely on those of the Regular Establishment; of course, there were certain exceptions, notably the flamboyant Zouave units. However, the Militia often added additional trimmings that gave the "gay and gaudy" touch for which they were noted. Following the example of the Regulars, the Militia adopted coat-skirt ornaments almost immediately after their appearance in 1832. They used the regulation flaming grenades, open and looped horns, and 5-and 6-pointed stars, but in both gold and silver on varicolored backgrounds and in a wide variety of sizes. They also used a number of peculiarly Militia forms, such as crossed-cannon, elements of state seals, and devices peculiar to specific units.

¶ Militia groups typically designed their uniforms to closely resemble those of the Regulars, though there were some exceptions, particularly the colorful Zouave units. However, the Militia often added extra decorations that gave them the "bright and flashy" look they were known for. Following the Regulars' lead, the Militia quickly adopted coat-skirt embellishments soon after they were introduced in 1832. They incorporated the standard flaming grenades, open and looped horns, and 5- and 6-pointed stars, using both gold and silver on multicolored backgrounds in a variety of sizes. They also featured several unique Militia designs, such as crossed cannons, elements from state seals, and insignia specific to certain units.

COAT-SKIRT ORNAMENT, ARTILLERY, C. 1836

USNM 604961-M (S-K 1105). Figure 193.

USNM 604961-M (S-K 1105). Figure 193.

Figure 193

Figure 193

Typical of Militia coat-skirt ornaments is this pair of crossed cannon devices for Militia artillery. They are of gold embroidery on a background of black velvet. Similar pairs in the national collections are embroidered in silver. The Regular artillery never wore the crossed cannon device on the skirt of the coat; so used, it was exclusively a Militia ornament.

Typical of Militia coat-skirt decorations is this pair of crossed cannon designs for Militia artillery. They are made of gold embroidery on a black velvet background. Similar pairs in the national collections are embroidered in silver. The Regular artillery never wore the crossed cannon design on the skirt of the coat; when used, it was exclusively a Militia decoration.

COAT-SKIRT ORNAMENT, SOUTH CAROLINA, C. 1836

USNM 604963 (S-K 1107). Figure 194.

USNM 604963 (S-K 1107). Figure 194.

Figure 194

Figure 194

Another coat-skirt ornament with an even more distinctly Militia touch is this small palmetto tree of (p. 96) gold embroidery, with sequins, on black wool cloth. As the palmetto tree is the basic device of the South Carolina seal (see pp. 81 and 83), this specimen must be attributed to the Militia of that state.

Another coat-skirt decoration with a stronger Military vibe is this small palmetto tree made of gold embroidery, with sequins, on black wool fabric. Since the palmetto tree is the main symbol of the South Carolina seal (see pp. 81 and 83), this piece should be credited to the Militia of that state.

¶ Most Militia cartridge-box plates made in the decade after 1841 were oval, following the pattern of the Regulars. While a few of these varied from the prescribed sizes, most were almost identical in both size and shape to those of the Regular Establishment, but with strictly Militia ornamentation. The exact years in which these plates were produced cannot be determined, but it is reasonably sure that they were supplied to Militia for some years prior to the opening of the Civil War. Not included here are similar types known to have been made for units born of the war as the Pennsylvania Fire Zouaves, Pennsylvania Home Guard, Pennsylvania Reserve Brigade, and the Ohio Volunteer Militia. Cartridge-box and waist-belt plates often are identical except for the methods of attachment. The plates for cartridge boxes have two wire loops imbedded in the backing (see fig. 90), while those for waist belts have one or two round, or sometimes arrowheaded, prongs on one side of the reverse, and with a narrow tongue on the opposite side bent parallel to the plane of the plate (see fig. 91).

¶ Most Militia cartridge box plates made in the decade after 1841 were oval, following the design of the Regulars. While a few of these differed from the specified sizes, most were nearly identical in both size and shape to those of the Regular Establishment, but with distinctive Militia decoration. The exact years these plates were made can't be determined, but it’s fairly certain they were provided to the Militia for several years before the start of the Civil War. This discussion does not include similar types known to have been produced for units formed during the war, such as the Pennsylvania Fire Zouaves, Pennsylvania Home Guard, Pennsylvania Reserve Brigade, and the Ohio Volunteer Militia. Cartridge box and waist belt plates are often identical except for how they attach. The plates for cartridge boxes have two wire loops embedded in the backing (see fig. 90), while those for waist belts have one or two round, or sometimes arrow-headed, prongs on one side of the back, and a narrow tongue on the opposite side bent parallel to the surface of the plate (see fig. 91).

CARTRIDGE-BOX PLATE, C. 1841

USNM 60400-M (S-K 156). Figure 195.

USNM 60400-M (S-K 156). Figure 195.

Figure 195

Figure 195

This brass, oval cartridge-box plate, with its eagle on a panoply of arms and colors, closely matches in size the 1841 Regular cavalry's plates for carbine cartridge boxes and the infantry's waist belts. Although plates of this design were worn as waist-belt plates, the two looped-wire fasteners on the reverse of this specimen clearly indicate its use on a cartridge box. This was undoubtedly a stock pattern. An oil painting of Capt. George Bumm, Pennsylvania State Artillery, c. 1840, shows the subject wearing a waist-belt plate of this same design.[131]

This brass, oval cartridge box plate, featuring an eagle on a collection of arms and colors, closely matches the size of the 1841 Regular cavalry plates used for carbine cartridge boxes and infantry waist belts. While plates of this design were used as waist-belt plates, the two looped-wire fasteners on the back of this piece clearly show that it was intended for a cartridge box. This was likely a standard pattern. An oil painting of Capt. George Bumm, Pennsylvania State Artillery, circa 1840, depicts him wearing a waist-belt plate with this same design.[131]

CARTRIDGE-BOX PLATE, C. 1841

USNM 60401-M (S-K 157). Figure 196.

USNM 60401-M (S-K 157). Figure 196.

Figure 196

Figure 196

Slightly smaller than the preceding specimen, this brass plate bears the eagle design popular from 1821 to 1851. Fitted with looped-wire fasteners, it would have been a stock pattern for cartridge boxes.

Slightly smaller than the previous example, this brass plate features the eagle design that was popular from 1821 to 1851. Equipped with looped-wire fasteners, it would have been a standard pattern for cartridge boxes.

CARTRIDGE-BOX PLATE, MAINE, C. 1850

USNM 60354-M (S-K 606). Figure 197.

USNM 60354-M (S-K 606). Figure 197.

Figure 197

Figure 197

A frequently misidentified plate is this brass-struck, lead-filled oval with the raised letters "VMM" for Volunteer Maine Militia. It is also known in a smaller size. The reverse is fitted with the two looped-wire fasteners normal to such plates.

A commonly misidentified plate is this brass-struck, lead-filled oval with the raised letters "VMM" for Volunteer Maine Militia. It's also available in a smaller size. The back has the typical two looped-wire fasteners found on such plates.

Other prewar oval plates bearing raised letters are known for the Alabama Volunteer Corps (AVC), North Carolina (NC), South Carolina (SC), State of New York (SNY), and New Hampshire State Militia (NHSM). Many such plates recently have been reproduced for sale, and more probably will be made (p. 97) if a market is created. Thus, all plates of this general type should be cautiously considered.

Other prewar oval plates featuring raised letters are recognized for the Alabama Volunteer Corps (AVC), North Carolina (NC), South Carolina (SC), State of New York (SNY), and New Hampshire State Militia (NHSM). Recently, many of these plates have been reproduced for sale, and more will likely be made (p. 97) if there’s demand. Therefore, all plates of this type should be approached with caution.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, DIE SAMPLE, C. 1840

USNM 60354-M (S-K 110). Figure 198.

USNM 60354-M (S-K 110). Figure 198.

Figure 198

Figure 198

One of the more unusual forms of the militant eagle used on ornaments is shown on this brass die sample for a waist-belt plate. The eagle, with fierce mien and wings outspread, stands high on a craggy ledge. An example of an untold number of odd and unusual pieces of insignia, this specimen is unidentified as to unit or area of intended use. It may well have been designed for use as a stock pattern.

One of the more unusual types of militant eagles seen on decorations is depicted on this brass die sample for a waist-belt plate. The eagle, with a fierce look and wings spread wide, stands tall on a rocky ledge. This is an example of countless odd and unique insignia pieces, but this particular one is unidentified regarding the unit or area it was meant for. It might have been created as a standard design.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, RIFLEMEN, C. 1840

USNM 604103-M (S-K 259). Figure 199.

USNM 604103-M (S-K 259). Figure 199.

Figure 199

Figure 199

A stock pattern, this plate is struck in brass with the open-horn device of riflemen, which has been previously discussed. Wire fasteners are on the reverse. Although the outer ring of the plate is missing, it was probably decorated with a wreath, a common form in the 1830's and 1840's.

A stock pattern, this plate is made of brass and features the open-horn design of riflemen, which has been discussed earlier. It has wire fasteners on the back. While the outer ring of the plate is missing, it likely had a wreath, a popular decoration in the 1830s and 1840s.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, CHARLESTOWN ARTILLERY, C. 1840

USNM 604385-M (S-K 532). Figure 200.

USNM 604385-M (S-K 532). Figure 200.

Figure 200

Figure 200

This 2-piece, brass-cast plate was worn by members of a Charlestown, Massachusetts, unit. The date (p. 98) "1786," as on nearly all dated pieces of insignia, refers to the date of original organization of the unit. The design of the plate is typical of early- to mid-Victorian taste.

This 2-piece, brass-cast plate was worn by members of a Charlestown, Massachusetts, unit. The date (p. 98) "1786," like on almost all dated insignia, refers to the year the unit was originally formed. The design of the plate reflects early to mid-Victorian style.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, MASSACHUSETTS, C. 1840

USNM 60497-M (S-K 253). Figure 201.

USNM 60497-M (S-K 253). Figure 201.

Figure 201

Figure 201

Bearing elements of the seal of the State of Massachusetts, this plate likely was a stock pattern sold to many officers. In construction, it is a composite piece similar to the plate for officers of the Corps of Topographical Engineers (see fig. 87 and p. 45) with the device applied to the inner oval. Because of its unusually striking appearance, it would have been a most appropriate type for staff and field officers, and possibly general officers.

Bearing elements of the seal of the State of Massachusetts, this plate was probably a standard design sold to many officers. It is a composite piece, similar to the plate for officers of the Corps of Topographical Engineers (see fig. 87 and p. 45), with the device placed on the inner oval. Due to its exceptionally eye-catching look, it would have been a very suitable type for staff and field officers, and possibly for general officers as well.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, NEW YORK, C. 1840

USNM 604126-M (S-K 282). Figure 202.

USNM 604126-M (S-K 282). Figure 202.

Figure 202

Figure 202

This plate, struck in poor-quality, medium-weight brass, is of a stock pattern bearing the eagle-on-half-globe device and the motto "Excelsior" from the New York State seal superimposed on a panoply of arms and colors. This type of belt plate, with the device on the inner panel and a wreath between the inner and outer borders, is most characteristic of the 1840's. More than ten different plates are known that vary only as to the design of the inner panel; some contain New York State heraldic devices, and others contain variants of the usual eagle design of the period.

This plate, made from low-quality, medium-weight brass, features a standard pattern with the eagle-on-half-globe design and the motto "Excelsior" from the New York State seal, layered over a mix of arms and colors. This type of belt plate, showcasing the design on the inner panel and a wreath between the inner and outer borders, is typical of the 1840s. Over ten different plates are known to exist that only differ in the design of the inner panel; some include New York State heraldic symbols, while others have variations of the common eagle design from that time.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, PHILADELPHIA, C. 1840

USNM 604390 (S-K 537). Figure 203.

USNM 604390 (S-K 537). Figure 203.

Figure 203

Figure 203

The devices on this cast-brass plate comprise the arms of the City of Philadelphia, and its form and pattern, especially the floral design of the outer ring, place it in the 1840's. The piece is bench-made and carries on the reverse many marks of the file used in its final assembly. It must be considered a stock pattern.

The devices on this cast-brass plate include the arms of the City of Philadelphia, and its shape and design, especially the floral pattern of the outer ring, date it to the 1840s. The piece is handcrafted and has several marks from the file used in its final assembly on the back. It should be seen as a standard design.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, SOUTH CAROLINA, C. 1840

USNM 604241-M (S-K 397). Figure 204.

USNM 604241-M (S-K 397). Figure 204.

Figure 204

Figure 204

Somewhat larger than many plates of the period, this brass specimen carries the South Carolina palmetto device. Such plates also were struck in copper and silver plated. It obviously was a stock pattern (p. 99) sold to several different units. The rectangular plate with the vine-patterned border was a stock pattern in itself, with many different devices being added in the center as ordered. This is one of the many pieces of insignia too often called Confederate but which ante-date the Civil War by almost two decades.

Somewhat larger than many plates of the time, this brass piece features the South Carolina palmetto emblem. Similar plates were also made in copper and silver plated materials. It was clearly a standard design (p. 99) sold to various units. The rectangular plate with the vine-patterned border was a standard design on its own, with many different emblems added in the center as requested. This is one of the many insignia pieces commonly referred to as Confederate but that actually predate the Civil War by nearly twenty years.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604388-M (S-K 535). Figure 205.

USNM 604388-M (S-K 535). Figure 205.

Figure 205

Figure 205

The eagle device on this silver-on-copper specimen closely resembles that on the cap plate of the First Troop Philadelphia City Cavalry (USNM 604964-M) and may possibly be the matching belt-plate worn by that organization. Such an eagle, however, would have been a stock pattern of the manufacturer, and sold to many different units. A very unusual aspect of this particular eagle are the three arrows held in the left talon: two of them point inward, the third outward.

The eagle design on this silver-on-copper piece looks a lot like the one on the cap plate of the First Troop Philadelphia City Cavalry (USNM 604964-M) and could be the matching belt plate used by that group. However, this type of eagle would have been a standard pattern from the manufacturer and sold to many different units. A distinctive feature of this specific eagle is the three arrows held in the left foot: two point inward, while the third points outward.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, ARTILLERY, C. 1840

USNM 604106-M (S-K 262). Figure 206.

USNM 604106-M (S-K 262). Figure 206.

Figure 206

Figure 206

Although members of the artillery of the Regular Establishment wore the crossed-cannon device on their shakos, they never wore it on waist- or shoulder-belt plates. Thus, this cast-brass plate must have been (p. 100) a stock pattern sold to many Militia units. The outer ring is missing.

Although members of the Regular Establishment's artillery wore the crossed-cannon emblem on their shakos, they never wore it on waist or shoulder belt plates. Therefore, this cast-brass plate must have been a standard design sold to many Militia units. The outer ring is missing.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604107-M (S-K 263). Figure 207.

USNM 604107-M (S-K 263). Figure 207.

Figure 207

Figure 207

This specimen, roughly cast in brass and gilded, is unusual because the Militia rarely used the letters "U S" on any of its equipment. The pattern does not conform to anything prescribed for Regulars and the quality does not come up to standards required by the Regular Establishment; hence it must have been worn by Militia. It would have been a stock pattern. There is the possibility that it might have been worn by diplomatic personnel, but its poor quality makes this unlikely.

This item, roughly made of brass and gold-plated, is unusual because the Militia rarely used the letters "US" on any of their gear. The design doesn't match what was required for Regulars, and the quality doesn't meet the standards set by the Regular Establishment; therefore, it must have been worn by the Militia. It would have been a standard design. There's a chance it might have been used by diplomatic staff, but its low quality makes that unlikely.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 604387-M (S-K 534). Figure 208.

USNM 604387-M (S-K 534). Figure 208.

Figure 208

Figure 208

The over-all design of this plate, which is cast roughly in brass and gilded, reflects the growing ornateness of the Victorian era. Obviously a stock pattern, it would have suited the fancy of several units and cannot be identified further than "for Militia." The design of the eagle is unusual in that three arrows are carried in the right talon—although it is possible that this is intended to reflect the belligerency inherent in the period of the War with Mexico—and there is a single large star in the canton of the Federal shield.

The overall design of this plate, which is roughly cast in brass and gold-plated, showcases the increasing ornamentation of the Victorian era. Clearly a standard pattern, it would appeal to several groups and cannot be pinpointed further than “for Militia.” The eagle's design is interesting in that it has three arrows in its right talon—possibly representing the aggression typical of the period during the War with Mexico—and there’s a single large star on the canton of the Federal shield.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604458-M (S-K 605). Figure 209.

USNM 604458-M (S-K 605). Figure 209.

Figure 209

Figure 209

The generalities that apply to all "stock pattern" insignia are equally valid in referring to this brass-struck plate with a 5-pointed star as its sole ornament. Dating its period of design poses no difficulty, for it contains the panel with wreath inside an edging border characteristic of the 1840's. The star device would have been appropriate for Militia units of Maine ("North Star"), Texas ("Lone Star"), or for dragoon units that took the star as a distinctive insignia. Although it may have been worn by Texans, it is doubtful that it was made originally for them. (p. 101) The design enjoyed a long life, and plates of this general pattern were struck well into the 1880's. The major difference between earlier and later specimens is that the early ones were struck on rather heavy sheets of copper-colored brass, with fasteners consisting of a tongue and heavy wire loops brazed to the reverse. The later plates have a bright brassy color, are struck on thin brass, and have the loop and tongue soldered rather than brazed.

The general principles that apply to all "stock pattern" insignia also apply to this brass plate featuring a 5-pointed star as its only decoration. Dating its design period is straightforward, as it has a panel with a wreath inside an edging border typical of the 1840s. The star design would have been suitable for Militia units from Maine ("North Star"), Texas ("Lone Star"), or dragoon units that adopted the star as their unique emblem. While it may have been used by Texans, it's unlikely that it was originally made for them. (p. 101) The design had a long lifespan, and plates of this type were made well into the 1880s. The main difference between earlier and later versions is that the early ones were made from heavy sheets of copper-colored brass, with fasteners that included a tongue and heavy wire loops brazed to the back. The later plates have a shiny brass finish, are made from thinner brass, and have the loops and tongue soldered instead of brazed.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604108-M (S-K 264). Figure 210.

USNM 604108-M (S-K 264). Figure 210.

Figure 210

Figure 210

The lack of a mane on the beast on this plate marks it as a tiger. The best known and most affluent Militia organization with the nickname "Tigers" was the Boston Light Infantry, although a number of others also were so-called. The craftsmanship and general elegance of this gold-plated brass specimen suggests that it was worn by an officer, though an occasional volunteer company was so richly endowed that all its members, officers and enlisted men alike, wore expensive devices. The bench-assembled manufacturing technique, gaudy embellishment, and lack of a distinct Victorian touch date the piece about 1840. The tiger's head is applied.

The absence of a mane on the beast on this plate identifies it as a tiger. The most well-known and wealthiest militia group nicknamed "Tigers" was the Boston Light Infantry, although several others went by the same name. The craftsmanship and overall elegance of this gold-plated brass piece suggest that it was worn by an officer, even though some volunteer companies were so well-funded that all their members, both officers and enlisted men, wore expensive insignia. The bench-assembled manufacturing method, flashy details, and lack of a distinct Victorian style date the piece to around 1840. The tiger's head is applied.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604104-M (S-K 260). Figure 211.

USNM 604104-M (S-K 260). Figure 211.

Figure 211

Figure 211

The full-flowing mane on the beast on this plate identifies it as a lion. The device would have been appropriate for wear by the Albany Burgesses Corps, which, when founded in 1833, almost immediately adopted the lion's head as its distinctive insignia. The unit continued to wear this plate for about half a century. While that unit's cap plate (fig. 170) is much more formal and is without a lion's head, its buttons contain the lion—with head turned to half-right—as a principal ornament. While it is probable that the original die for this cast-brass plate was sunk for the Albany organization, the manufacturer would not have hesitated to offer it for sale to any interested Militia unit.

The flowing mane on the creature depicted on this plate clearly shows that it’s a lion. This design would have been suitable for the Albany Burgesses Corps, which, when established in 1833, quickly adopted the lion's head as its unique emblem. The unit continued to use this plate for around fifty years. Although the unit's cap plate (fig. 170) is more formal and doesn’t feature a lion's head, its buttons prominently display the lion—its head turned slightly to the right. While it’s likely that the original mold for this cast-brass plate was created for the Albany organization, the manufacturer wouldn’t have hesitated to sell it to any Militia unit that was interested.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 60479-M (S-K 235). Figure 212.

USNM 60479-M (S-K 235). Figure 212.

Figure 212

Figure 212

The raised letters "W G" on this cast-brass and gilded plate would have been suitable for many (p. 102) Militia units of the period. We can only suggest that it may have been worn by members of a "Washington Greys" or "Washington Guard" from Pennsylvania or New York. A round plate with an outer wreath would have been more appropriate for officers than for enlisted personnel.

The raised letters "W G" on this cast-brass and gold-plated plate would have been fitting for many (p. 102) Militia units of that time. We can only speculate that it might have been worn by members of a "Washington Greys" or "Washington Guard" from Pennsylvania or New York. A round plate with an outer wreath would have been more suitable for officers than for enlisted soldiers.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, WASHINGTON GREYS, C. 1850

USNM 604137-M (S-K 293). Figure 213.

USNM 604137-M (S-K 293). Figure 213.

Figure 213

Figure 213

The waist-belt plates shown in the U.S. Military Magazine[132] for the Washington Greys of Philadelphia and Reading, Pennsylvania, while indistinct, are definitely not of this pattern. Thus, this brass plate with its sunken letters filled with black enamel must have been worn by yet a third unit with such a name. Additional specimens in the national collections have the company letters "G" and "K."

The waist-belt plates shown in the U.S. Military Magazine[132] for the Washington Greys of Philadelphia and Reading, Pennsylvania, while unclear, are definitely not this design. Therefore, this brass plate with its recessed letters filled with black enamel must have been worn by yet another unit with a similar name. Additional examples in the national collections feature the company letters "G" and "K."

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604294-M (S-K 450). Figure 214.

USNM 604294-M (S-K 450). Figure 214.

Figure 214

Figure 214

This oval, convex, brass plate, with two studs and a hook soldered to the reverse for attachment, very probably was originally a shoulder-belt plate. The letters "W L G" incised on the obverse are very patently the added work of an engraver of no great talent. The letters doubtless stand for Washington Light Guard, and, since there were several Militia units of that designation, it seems possible that one of the less affluent units bought the plates and had them engraved locally.

This oval, curved brass plate, with two studs and a hook welded on the back for attachment, was likely originally a shoulder-belt plate. The letters "W L G" carved on the front clearly show that an engraver of limited skill made them. The letters probably represent Washington Light Guard, and since there were several militia units with that name, it's likely that one of the less wealthy units purchased the plates and had them engraved locally.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, CITY GUARDS, C. 1840

USNM 604386-M (S-K 533). Figure 215.

USNM 604386-M (S-K 533). Figure 215.

Figure 215

Figure 215

There were City Guards in Charleston, South Carolina, New York City, Philadelphia, and possibly in other places. Thus it is impossible to determine just which of these units wore this cast-brass plate. The ornamented outer oval is typical of the 1840's.

There were City Guards in Charleston, South Carolina, New York City, Philadelphia, and maybe some other locations. So, it's hard to say exactly which unit wore this cast-brass plate. The decorative outer oval is typical of the 1840s.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, NATIONAL GUARD, C. 1850

USNM 60206-M. Figure 216.

USNM 60206-M. Fig. 216.

Figure 216

Figure 216

A number of Militia units carried the designation "National Guard." The unit that used this particular plate was from New Jersey, for scratched on the reverse is "Sergeant O. Clinton, October 9th, 1851, 1st Reg Hudson Brigade, NJSM"; However, the adjutant general, State of New Jersey, was unable to give any information on such an organization. The specimen is cut from rolled brass with sunken letters filled with black enamel.

A number of militia units were called the "National Guard." The unit that used this specific plate was from New Jersey, as noted on the back: "Sergeant O. Clinton, October 9th, 1851, 1st Reg Hudson Brigade, NJSM." However, the adjutant general of the State of New Jersey couldn't provide any details about this organization. The item is made from rolled brass with recessed letters filled with black enamel.

¶ Shoulder-belt plates underwent the same transition as cap plates did beginning about 1837-1838, with the single die strike plate yielding to the composite plate, and applied devices being attached to oval, rectangular, or rectangular "clipped corner" plates. While some single die plates were made and worn (p. 103) after 1840, no composite types that predate 1835 are known. The following group of shoulder-belt plates are typical of those that first appeared about 1840. Of these, several continued unchanged through the Civil War and into the 1870's and 1880's.

¶ Shoulder-belt plates went through the same evolution as cap plates starting around 1837-1838, shifting from single die strike plates to composite plates, with attached designs on oval, rectangular, or rectangular "clipped corner" plates. Although some single die plates were still made and worn (p. 103) after 1840, no composite types known to exist are from before 1835. The following group of shoulder-belt plates represents those that first emerged around 1840. Of these, several remained unchanged throughout the Civil War and into the 1870s and 1880s.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604341-M (S-K 497). Figure 217.

USNM 604341-M (S-K 497). Figure 217.

Figure 217

Figure 217

This unusually large, oval, brass plate with the letters "C G" in silver applied with wire fasteners is another of that sizable group of lettered insignia that cannot be attributed definitely to a particular organization. The "C G" may stand variously for City Guard, Cleveland Greys, Charleston Guard, or some other organization. With a stock of oval and rectangular blanks and a set of lettering and number-cutting dies, an almost limitless combination of plates could be turned out by a single manufacturer.

This unusually large, oval brass plate with the letters "C G" in silver attached with wire fasteners is part of a large group of lettered insignia that can't be definitely linked to a specific organization. The "C G" could represent City Guard, Cleveland Greys, Charleston Guard, or another group. With a supply of oval and rectangular blanks and a set of lettering and number-cutting dies, a single manufacturer could create an almost endless combination of plates.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, NEW YORK, C. 1840

USNM 604470-M (S-K 617). Figure 218.

USNM 604470-M (S-K 617). Figure 218.

Figure 218

Figure 218

The basic form of this brass plate—with one of the many variations of the seal of the State of New York[133] applied with wire fasteners—is a copy, with minor changes, of the bevelled plate prescribed for the Regular Establishment in 1839. Distinctly an officer's plate, it would have been appropriate for artillery or staff.

The basic design of this brass plate—featuring one of the many variations of the seal of the State of New York[133] attached with wire fasteners—is a copy, with slight modifications, of the beveled plate specified for the Regular Establishment in 1839. Clearly meant for an officer, it would have been suitable for artillery or staff.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604331-M (S-K 487). Figure 219.

USNM 604331-M (S-K 487). Figure 219.

Figure 219

Figure 219

This composite plate, struck in brass, has a bevelled, rectangular base almost identical to the base of the 1839 regulation plate (see fig. 86). The design consists of a silvered center ornament comprising a trophy of flags, a sword, and a liberty pole surmounted by a wreath of laurel inclosing fasces and a Federal shield with 26 stars in its canton. This silver ornament is applied with four simple wire fasteners rather than (p. 104) soldered. Since the sun rays in the background radiate outward not from the center but from the edge of a circle about 1-1/2 inches in diameter, almost any desired center ornament could have been added to the basic strike, or the plate could be struck a second time to add a device integral to it. Thus the background portion of the specimen must be considered a stock pattern. A print of the National Guards of Philadelphia in U.S. Military Magazine for October 1841 shows an officer wearing a similar plate. If the stars are significant, the plate can be dated between 1837 and 1845.

This composite plate, made of brass, features a beveled, rectangular base that is almost identical to the base of the 1839 regulation plate (see fig. 86). The design includes a silver center ornament that showcases a trophy of flags, a sword, and a liberty pole topped with a wreath of laurel encircling fasces and a Federal shield with 26 stars in its canton. This silver ornament is attached with four simple wire fasteners instead of being soldered. Since the sun rays in the background radiate outward not from the center but from the edge of a circle about 1-1/2 inches in diameter, almost any desired center ornament could have been added to the basic strike, or the plate could be struck a second time to include a design integral to it. Therefore, the background portion of the specimen should be seen as a stock pattern. A print of the National Guards of Philadelphia in U.S. Military Magazine for October 1841 shows an officer wearing a similar plate. If the stars are meaningful, the plate can be dated between 1837 and 1845.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604471-M (S-K 618). Figure 220.

USNM 604471-M (S-K 618). Figure 220.

Figure 220

Figure 220

In this plate, the center ornament used in the preceding specimen has been struck directly in a rectangular, bevelled background. However, the background of this plate has a stippled surface rather than a sunburst. An interesting feature is that there are four slots punched through the plate for the attachment of an additional device over the wreath and shield. This is another of the many examples of how a unit might have an insignia distinctive to itself at little extra cost. This plate is obviously of a stock pattern. The national collections also contain a die sample of this particular plate.

In this plate, the central ornament used in the earlier example has been stamped directly onto a rectangular, beveled background. However, the background of this plate has a stippled texture instead of a sunburst pattern. An interesting detail is that there are four slots punched through the plate for attaching an extra device over the wreath and shield. This shows how a unit could have its own unique insignia at minimal extra expense. This plate clearly follows a standard design. The national collections also have a die sample of this specific plate.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604472-M (S-K 619). Figure 221.

USNM 604472-M (S-K 619). Figure 221.

Figure 221

Figure 221

Another example of the rectangular, bevelled-edged, shoulder-belt plate for officers is this brass-cast copy (p. 105) of the 1839 Regular Army pattern with the wire-fastened letters "S V G" substituted for "U. S." The specimen bears a touchmark "W. Pinchin Philad" on the reverse (see p. 33). The unit for which this plate was made is unidentified.

Another example of the rectangular, beveled-edge, shoulder-belt plate for officers is this brass-cast replica (p. 105) of the 1839 Regular Army pattern, featuring the wire-fastened letters "S V G" instead of "USA" The piece has a touchmark "W. Pinchin Philad" on the back (see p. 33). The unit for which this plate was created is unknown.

SHOULDER-BELT(?) PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604394-M (S-K 541). Figure 222.

USNM 604394-M (S-K 541). Figure 222.

Figure 222

Figure 222

The silver letters "S F" applied with wire fasteners to the small brass plate are most appropriate for the State Fencibles of Philadelphia, and it is believed to have possibly been worn by that unit in the 1840's. A print in the U.S. Military Magazine[134] portraying this unit shows an officer wearing a plate of an entirely different design, but since a plate in this simple form would most probably have been worn by enlisted personnel, and the soldier in the print is to be seen only from the rear, such identification as to unit may be correct.

The silver letters "S F" attached with wire fasteners to the small brass plate are fitting for the State Fencibles of Philadelphia, and it’s thought to have possibly been worn by that unit in the 1840s. A print in the U.S. Military Magazine[134] depicting this unit shows an officer wearing a plate of a completely different design, but since a plate in this simple style would likely have been worn by enlisted personnel, and the soldier in the print is only visible from the back, that identification with the unit might be accurate.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, BOSTON LIGHT INFANTRY, C. 1840

USNM 604339-M (S-K 495). Figure 223.

USNM 604339-M (S-K 495). Figure 223.

Figure 223

Figure 223

This unusually large silver-on-copper plate with its brass letters "B L I", "1798", and brass tiger's head is attributed to the Boston Light Infantry. The applied devices are attached with simple wire fasteners. The date 1798 is believed to be the year of the original organization of the unit, but the adjutant general of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts was unable to verify this.

This unusually large silver-on-copper plate with its brass letters "B L I", "1798", and brass tiger's head is attributed to the Boston Light Infantry. The applied devices are attached with simple wire fasteners. The date 1798 is thought to be the year the unit was originally formed, but the adjutant general of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts couldn’t confirm this.

(p. 106) SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, NEW YORK LIGHT GUARD, C. 1840

USNM. 604351-M (S-K 507). Figure 224.

USNM. 604351-M (S-K 507). Figure 224.

Figure 224

Figure 224

The New York Military Magazine provides us with a strong clue in identifying this clipped-corner, bevelled-edged brass plate with a silver-on-copper tiger's head applied. In a sketch of the Light Guard of New York it is related that, following a visit in 1836 to the Boston Light Infantry, members of the company "adopted, as part of their uniform, a silver tiger's head, to be placed on the breast plate, as a further memento of the spirited and elegant corps whose guests they had been."[135] This specimen is in agreement with that description.

The New York Military Magazine gives us a strong hint in identifying this brass plate with clipped corners and beveled edges featuring a silver-on-copper tiger's head. In a sketch of the Light Guard of New York, it mentions that after a visit in 1836 to the Boston Light Infantry, members of the company "adopted, as part of their uniform, a silver tiger's head, to be placed on the breast plate, as a further memento of the spirited and elegant corps whose guests they had been."[135] This specimen matches that description.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, DRAGOONS, C. 1840

USNM 604352-M (S-K 508). Figure 225.

USNM 604352-M (S-K 508). Figure 225.

Figure 225

Figure 225

An unusual manufacturing technique was used in making this plate. It was struck in very heavy brass about 1/16 inch thick and the whole tinned; then, all the tin on the obverse, except that on the crested helmet device, was buffed away, giving the center ornament the appearance of having been silvered. The specimen obviously was made for a particular mounted unit, designation unknown. An interesting detail is the letter "A" on the half-sunburst plate of the dragoon helmet device.

An unusual manufacturing technique was used to create this plate. It was made from very heavy brass, about 1/16 inch thick, and then fully covered in tin; afterward, all the tin on the front, except for the area on the crested helmet design, was polished off, which gives the central ornament a silver-like appearance. This piece was clearly made for a specific mounted unit, though its designation is unknown. An interesting detail is the letter "A" on the half-sunburst plate of the dragoon helmet design.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604350-M (S-K 506). Figure 226.

USNM 604350-M (S-K 506). Figure 226.

Figure 226

Figure 226

This plate, which is of brass with a cast, white-metal likeness of Washington applied with wire fasteners, may well have belonged to either the Washington Greys of Philadelphia or the unit of the same designation of Reading, Pennsylvania. Prints of these two organizations in U.S. Military Magazine[136] show profiles on the shoulder-belts plates, although the plate of the Reading unit is depicted as being oval.

This plate, made of brass with a cast white-metal image of Washington attached with wire fasteners, likely belonged to either the Washington Greys of Philadelphia or the similarly named unit from Reading, Pennsylvania. Prints of these two groups in U.S. Military Magazine[136] show profiles on the shoulder-belt plates, but the plate from the Reading unit is shown as oval.

(p. 107) SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604337-M (S-K 493). Figure 227.

USNM 604337-M (S-K 493). Figure 227.

Figure 227

Figure 227

This brass plate with its wire-applied devices obviously belonged to an Irish-group Militia unit. The Huddy and Duval print of the Hibernia Greens of Philadelphia[137] definitely depicts an Irish harp on both the shoulder-belt plate and the cap plate, but the motto "ERIN GO BRAGH" is not included. The specimen would have been suitable for several Militia organizations, such as the Irish Jasper Greens of Savannah, Georgia, and the Montgomery Hibernia Greens. Its devices are wire-applied, and it possibly was a stock pattern.

This brass plate with its wire-applied designs clearly belonged to an Irish militia unit. The Huddy and Duval print of the Hibernia Greens of Philadelphia[137] definitely shows an Irish harp on both the shoulder-belt plate and the cap plate, but the motto "Ireland Forever" isn't included. This item would have been appropriate for several militia organizations, like the Irish Jasper Greens of Savannah, Georgia, and the Montgomery Hibernia Greens. Its designs are wire-applied, and it may have been a standard pattern.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1840

USNM 604340 (S-K 496). Figure 228.

USNM 604340 (S-K 496). Figure 228.

Figure 228

Figure 228

This plain brass plate, having wire-applied pewter letters "S L I" is believed to have been worn by the Salem Light Infantry of Massachusetts.

This simple brass plate, with wire-applied pewter letters "S L I", is thought to have been worn by the Salem Light Infantry of Massachusetts.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, NEW ENGLAND GUARDS, C. 1840

USNM 604343-M (S-K 499). Figure 229.

USNM 604343-M (S-K 499). Figure 229.

Figure 229

Figure 229

Letters signifying the New England Guards are embossed on a shield of white metal that is attached to this brass plate, which has scalloped corners. Although the officer depicted in the Huddy and Duval print of the New England Guards[138] wears a waist belt rather than a shoulder belt for his sword, the soldier standing in the background is shown with crossed shoulder belts. Thus, this plate may have been an item of equipment for enlisted personnel rather than for officers.

Letters representing the New England Guards are embossed on a white metal shield attached to a brass plate with scalloped corners. While the officer in the Huddy and Duval print of the New England Guards[138] wears a waist belt instead of a shoulder belt for his sword, the soldier in the background is depicted with crossed shoulder belts. Therefore, this plate may have been a piece of equipment intended for enlisted personnel rather than officers.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, MASSACHUSETTS, C. 1840

USNM 604342-M (S-K 498). Figure 230.

USNM 604342-M (S-K 498). Figure 230.

Figure 230

Figure 230

Although the white-metal arm and sword on wreath device wired to this large brass plate immediately identifies the origin of the specimen as Massachusetts, the considerable heraldic license taken by this insignia-maker is only too evident. When the Massachusetts State seal was first adopted in 1780, the blazonry of the crest was given as follows: "On a Wreath a dexter Arm cloathed and ruffled proper, (p. 108) grasping a Broad Sword...."[139] The designer has placed the arm in armor and replaced the "broad sword" with a scimiter-like, edged weapon. The use of the crest of a state seal or coat of arms to indicate the state was common usage, with the eagle-on-half-globe of New York providing an excellent example. This plate would have been appropriate for wear by any Massachusetts unit, and is thus considered to have been a stock pattern.

Although the white-metal arm and sword on a wreath device connected to this large brass plate clearly shows that it comes from Massachusetts, the significant artistic freedom taken by the creator of this insignia is quite apparent. When the Massachusetts State seal was first adopted in 1780, the description of the crest was given as follows: "On a Wreath a dexter Arm clothed and ruffled proper, (p. 108) grasping a Broad Sword...."[139] The designer has depicted the arm in armor and replaced the "broad sword" with a scimitar-like, edged weapon. Using the crest of a state seal or coat of arms to represent the state was common practice, with the eagle-on-half-globe of New York being a prime example. This plate would have been suitable for wear by any Massachusetts unit, and is therefore considered to have been a standard design.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, SOUTH CAROLINA, C. 1840

USNM 604454-M (S-K 601). Figure 231.

USNM 604454-M (S-K 601). Figure 231.

Figure 231

Figure 231

The silver palmetto tree identifies this as a South Carolina plate. The letters "L" and "A" are subject to several interpretations, the more probable being "Light Artillery." The devices are attached with simple wire fasteners, and the basic brass plate can be considered to have been a stock item adaptable to any number of units.

The silver palmetto tree marks this as a South Carolina plate. The letters "L" and "A" can be interpreted in a few ways, but the most likely meaning is "Light Artillery." The devices are secured with basic wire fasteners, and the standard brass plate can be seen as a common item that could be modified for various units.

(p. 109) SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1845

USNM 60357-M (S-K 113). Figure 232.

USNM 60357-M (S-K 113). Figure 232.

Figure 232

Figure 232

This brass, lead-backed badge bears no devices that would assist in identifying it as to unit, and its general composition would have made it appealing to more than one Militia organization. It is considered a stock pattern. The stars-on-belt motif, forming the border of the oval, is very unusual, as are the 14 arrows in the eagle's left talon and the star beneath its beak. The center eagle device is applied with simple wire fasteners.

This brass badge, backed with lead, has no markings that would help identify its unit, and its overall design would have attracted multiple Militia organizations. It's seen as a standard pattern. The stars-on-belt design around the oval border is quite rare, as are the 14 arrows in the eagle's left claw and the star beneath its beak. The eagle in the center is attached with basic wire fasteners.

¶ Following the War with Mexico, many State Militia, especially those in the south, began using their state coats of arms as the principal devices on their waist-belt plates. The plates for officers followed the earlier pattern for Regulars, a round device clasped within an outer ring. Plates of enlisted personnel more often were rectangular, but there were many exceptions. The following series includes examples of both types.

¶ After the War with Mexico, many State Militias, especially in the South, started using their state coats of arms as the main designs on their waist-belt plates. The officer plates followed the earlier design for Regulars, featuring a round emblem within an outer ring. Enlisted personnel plates were usually rectangular, though there were many exceptions. The following series includes examples of both types.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, ALABAMA C. 1850

USNM 604221-M (S-K 377). Figure 233.

USNM 604221-M (S-K 377). Figure 233.

Figure 233

Figure 233

The old Alabama State seal with a representation of a map of the State hung from a tree trunk, as depicted on the inner ring of this cast-brass waist-belt plate, became obsolete after the Civil War when the "reconstruction" government changed the device to that of an eagle resting on a Federal shield. Some years later, however, the original seal, in somewhat modified form, was readopted. Although made in the early 1850's, plates of this type were worn by personnel of the Confederate States Army throughout the Civil War. Many plates of this same basic pattern were made in England and run through the blockade.

The old Alabama State seal, featuring a map of the State, hung from a tree trunk as shown on the inner ring of this cast-brass waist-belt plate. It became outdated after the Civil War when the "reconstruction" government changed the design to an eagle resting on a Federal shield. However, a few years later, the original seal, in a slightly modified version, was readopted. Although made in the early 1850s, plates like this were worn by members of the Confederate States Army throughout the Civil War. Many plates of this same basic design were produced in England and smuggled through the blockade.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, CALIFORNIA, C. 1850

USNM 604389-M (S-K 536). Figure 234.

USNM 604389-M (S-K 536). Figure 234.

Figure 234

Figure 234

The 31 six-pointed stars in the outer ring of this cast-brass plate bearing the central elements of the (p. 110) California State seal indicate that it was made after statehood was granted in 1850 but before 1858 when Minnesota became the 32d State. Actually, this design for the arms of the State was adopted in anticipation of admission to the Union, on October 2, 1849.[140] The ornate design of this plate is more characteristic of the 1840's than later, indicating that it was made very early in the 1850's.

The 31 six-pointed stars in the outer ring of this cast-brass plate featuring the central elements of the (p. 110) California State seal show that it was created after California became a state in 1850 but before 1858, when Minnesota became the 32nd State. In fact, this design for the state's arms was adopted in anticipation of joining the Union on October 2, 1849.[140] The elaborate design of this plate is more typical of the 1840s than of later periods, suggesting that it was made very early in the 1850s.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, FLORIDA, C. 1850

USNM 604224-M (S-K 380). Figure 235.

USNM 604224-M (S-K 380). Figure 235.

Figure 235

Figure 235

The palm tree, standing alone, although sometimes mistaken for the palmetto of South Carolina, is representative of the State of Florida. Thus, this plate is ascribed to Florida Militia, about 1850. The late Richard D. Steuart, of Baltimore, Maryland, an outstanding authority on Confederate equipment and accoutrements, was firm in asserting that this pattern should be ascribed to Florida.

The palm tree, standing alone and often confused with the palmetto of South Carolina, symbolizes the State of Florida. Therefore, this plate is attributed to the Florida Militia, around 1850. The late Richard D. Steuart from Baltimore, Maryland, a well-respected expert on Confederate gear and accessories, strongly argued that this design should be associated with Florida.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, MASSACHUSETTS, C. 1850

USNM 604124-M (S-K 280). Figure 236.

USNM 604124-M (S-K 280). Figure 236.

Figure 236

Figure 236

While cast-brass plates of this type were first made in the early 1850's, their use continued for 20 years or more after that decade. The principal device on this specimen is taken from the arms of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The form of the plate is identical to the pattern of the eagle-wreath plate adopted by the Regulars in 1851.

While cast-brass plates like this were first produced in the early 1850s, they were still used for 20 years or more after that decade. The main design on this piece is taken from the emblem of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The shape of the plate is exactly like the eagle-wreath plate pattern adopted by the Regulars in 1851.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1845

USNM 604244-M (S-K 400). Figure 237.

USNM 604244-M (S-K 400). Figure 237.

Figure 237

Figure 237

The star device was used by the Militia of both Texas and Maine, as well as by volunteer units located in other states; thus, this plate cannot be ascribed to any particular geographical area. Plates such as this, with the silver wreath of laurel and palm, are patterned directly after the basic plate prescribed for officers of the Corps of Engineers in 1841. They would have been stock items for general sale.

The star device was used by the militias of both Texas and Maine, as well as by volunteer units from other states; therefore, this plate can't be linked to any specific geographical area. Plates like this, featuring the silver wreath of laurel and palm, are directly modeled after the basic plate meant for officers of the Corps of Engineers in 1841. They would have been standard items available for general sale.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 604242-M (S-K 398). Figure 238.

USNM 604242-M (S-K 398). Figure 238.

Figure 238

Figure 238

This cast-brass officer's plate, a pre-Civil War product of American manufacture, would have been appropriate (p. 111) for wear by Texas Militia. Obviously a stock pattern, it would also have been sold to Militia organizations in other parts of the country. As in the case of most round plates, the outer ring is of a standard design; variation in pattern would occur on the inner ring.

This cast-brass officer's plate, made in America before the Civil War, would have been suitable (p. 111) for use by the Texas Militia. Clearly a standard design, it would also have been sold to militia groups in other regions of the country. Like most round plates, the outer ring follows a common design; any differences in style would happen on the inner ring.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, NEW YORK, C. 1850

USNM 604125-M (S-K 281). Figure 239.

USNM 604125-M (S-K 281). Figure 239.

Figure 239

Figure 239

This brass-struck rectangular plate carries the arms of the State of New York[141] with its familiar eagle-on-half-globe device. The whole is superimposed on a sunburst background. The plate originally was made for Militia, but it is conceivable that such a plate may have been worn by early uniformed police.

This brass rectangular plate features the emblem of the State of New York[141] with its well-known eagle on a half-globe design. The entire design is set against a sunburst backdrop. The plate was originally created for the Militia, but it's possible that similar plates could have been worn by early uniformed police.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, NEW YORK, C. 1850

USNM 60487-M (S-K 243). Figure 240.

USNM 60487-M (S-K 243). Figure 240.

Figure 240

Figure 240

This brass-cast plate with its letters "S N Y" for State of New York is copied directly from the 1836 plate for noncommissioned officers of the Regular Establishment. The example is the oldest known use of the letters "S N Y" for New York Militia. In later patterns, the letters "S N Y" and "N Y" were placed on rectangular plates and on oval plates worn on the waist belt and on cartridge boxes just prior to and during the Civil War. Small square plates with silver, Old English letters "NY" are included in the 1900 catalog of the Warnock Uniform Co. of New (p. 112) York as regulation pattern that year for National Guard officers.

This brass plate, featuring the letters "SNY" for the State of New York, is directly copied from the 1836 plate for noncommissioned officers of the Regular Establishment. This example is the oldest known use of the letters "SNY" for the New York Militia. In later designs, the letters "SNY" and "N Y" were placed on rectangular and oval plates worn on waist belts and cartridge boxes just before and during the Civil War. Small square plates with silver, Old English letters "NYC" are listed in the 1900 catalog of the Warnock Uniform Co. of New (p. 112) York as the regulation pattern for that year for National Guard officers.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, NEW YORK CITY, C. 1850

USNM. 604141-M (S-K 297). Figure 241.

USNM. 604141-M (S-K 297). Figure 241.

Figure 241

Figure 241

This cast-brass plate bears the arms of the city of New York superimposed on an almost full sunburst. The surrounding wreath of laurel is taken directly from the plate authorized for general and staff officers of the Regular Establishment in 1832. While this is thought to be the plate for the New York City Guards, for whom a matching shoulder-belt plate is known, there is the possibility that it was also worn by uniformed police of the 1850's.

This cast-brass plate features the arms of the city of New York overlaid on a nearly complete sunburst. The surrounding laurel wreath is taken directly from the plate approved for general and staff officers of the Regular Establishment in 1832. Although it's believed to be the plate for the New York City Guards, for whom a matching shoulder-belt plate is known, there's a chance it was also worn by uniformed police in the 1850s.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 604393-M (S-K 340). Figure 242.

USNM 604393-M (S-K 340). Figure 242.

Figure 242

Figure 242

A stock pattern, this cast-brass and gilded plate would have been appropriate for any of the several organizations called "National Guards" or "National Greys" that existed in a number of states. The letters "N G" do not connote the National Guard as we know it today.

A stock pattern, this cast-brass and gilded plate would have been suitable for any of the various groups called "National Guards" or "National Greys" that existed in several states. The letters "N G" do not refer to the National Guard as we know it today.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, OHIO, C. 1850

USNM 604136-M (S-K 292). Figure 243.

USNM 604136-M (S-K 292). Figure 243.

Figure 243

Figure 243

The center piece applied to this cast-brass plate with wire fasteners bears an early form of the arms of the State of Ohio.[142] The plate proper has holes in it other than those needed to apply the present device, which indicates that it was a stock part, or possibly that the present center device is not original to the plate.

The centerpiece attached to this cast-brass plate with wire fasteners features an early version of the State of Ohio's coat of arms.[142] The plate itself has additional holes besides the ones used for the current attachment, suggesting that it was a standard part, or perhaps that the current centerpiece is not the original one for the plate.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, OHIO, C. 1850

USNM 604130-M (S-K 286). Figure 244.

USNM 604130-M (S-K 286). Figure 244.

Figure 244

Figure 244

This plate bears another variation of the Ohio State arms. Here, the arms lie within a wreath as prescribed for Regular general and staff officers in 1832. The entire specimen is cast in brass; the wreath, sun, arrows, canal wall, and hull of keelboat are silvered.

This plate features a different version of the Ohio State arms. In this design, the arms are situated within a wreath, as designated for regular general and staff officers in 1832. The entire piece is made of brass; the wreath, sun, arrows, canal wall, and hull of the keelboat are coated in silver.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, PENNSYLVANIA, C. 1850

USNM 60474-M (S-K 230). Figure 245.

USNM 60474-M (S-K 230). Figure 245.

Figure 245

Figure 245

Officers of the Pennsylvania Volunteer Militia wore plates of this type in the 1850's, although most were (p. 113) discarded in 1861 when Pennsylvania troops went into active Federal service. The outer ring, with floral wreath design, has been modified to give the appearance of a solid rectangle. Another plate in the national collections bears the letters "P V M" with the conventional outer ring.

Officers of the Pennsylvania Volunteer Militia wore plates like this in the 1850s, although most were (p. 113) discarded in 1861 when Pennsylvania troops were called into active Federal service. The outer ring, featuring a floral wreath design, has been changed to look like a solid rectangle. Another plate in the national collections displays the letters "PVM" with the standard outer ring.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 60480-M (S-K 236). Figure 246.

USNM 60480-M (S-K 236). Figure 246.

Figure 246

Figure 246

Just prior to 1850 there were two Militia units in Philadelphia using the letters "P G" to indicate organizational designation—the Philadelphia Guards and the Philadelphia City Greys. This brass-cast plate is believed to have been worn by the Philadelphia Guards, whose buttons were marked "P G." The buttons worn by the Philadelphia City Greys carried the three letters "P C G."[143]

Just before 1850, there were two militia units in Philadelphia that used the letters "P G" to identify themselves—the Philadelphia Guards and the Philadelphia City Greys. This brass-cast plate is thought to have been worn by the Philadelphia Guards, whose buttons were labeled "P G." The buttons for the Philadelphia City Greys featured the letters "P C G."[143]

WAIST-BELT PLATE, PROVIDENCE MARINE CORPS ARTILLERY C. 1850

USNM 604147-M (S-K 303). Figure 247.

USNM 604147-M (S-K 303). Figure 247.

Figure 247

Figure 247

The letters and device on this rather unusual brass plate make its identification easy. The letters stand for the Providence [R.I.] Marine Corps Artillery; the date 1801 is the unit's original organization date. The crossed cannon indicate Militia artillery. The letters and numerals are of white metal and brazed to the plate. The brass crossed cannon are affixed with wire fasteners. The reverse is fitted with a broad tongue and two wire hooks for attachment.

The letters and design on this unique brass plate make it easy to identify. The letters represent the Providence [R.I.] Marine Corps Artillery, and the date 1801 marks the unit's original establishment date. The crossed cannons signify militia artillery. The letters and numbers are made of white metal and are attached to the plate. The brass crossed cannons are secured with wire fasteners. The back is designed with a wide tongue and two wire hooks for attachment.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, SOUTH CAROLINA, C. 1850

USNM 604455-M (S-K 602). Figure 248.

USNM 604455-M (S-K 602). Figure 248.

Figure 248

Figure 248

Although this specimen is not so old as the similar South Carolina plate described previously (fig. 162), it is believed to date about 1850. The plate proper is of rolled brass, and the applied device, which comprises well-known elements of the arms of South Carolina, is struck in brass and attached by means of two wire staples and leather thongs.

Although this specimen isn't as old as the similar South Carolina plate mentioned earlier (fig. 162), it's thought to date back to around 1850. The plate itself is made of rolled brass, and the applied design, which features familiar elements of the South Carolina coat of arms, is pressed in brass and secured with two wire staples and leather thongs.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, VIRGINIA, C. 1850

USNM 604253-M (S-K 409). Figure 249.

USNM 604253-M (S-K 409). Figure 249.

Figure 249

Figure 249

This plate, carrying the Virginia seal, was made about 1850 for wear by officers. Similar plates made by British manufacturers during the Civil War to (p. 114) be run through the blockade are generally distinguishable by their unusually sharp, clean die work. The center device of this specimen is struck in brass and brazed in place; the remainder of the plate is brass-cast.

This plate, featuring the Virginia seal, was created around 1850 for officers to wear. Plates made by British manufacturers during the Civil War to (p. 114) get past the blockade are typically recognizable by their exceptionally sharp, clean die work. The central design of this piece is struck in brass and brazed in place; the rest of the plate is cast from brass.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, GRAY GUARDS, C. 1850

USNM 60489-M (S-K 245). Figure 250.

USNM 60489-M (S-K 245). Figure 250.

Figure 250

Figure 250

The unit for which this plate was made cannot be precisely identified. It is reasonable to assume that there were several Militia organizations called "Gray Guards." The central "G" probably indicates "Company G." The whole is cast brass.

The exact unit for which this plate was made can't be clearly identified. It's fair to assume there were several militia organizations called "Gray Guards." The central "G" likely represents "Company G." The entire piece is made of cast brass.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 60490-M (S-K 246). Figure 251.

USNM 60490-M (S-K 246). Figure 251.

Figure 251

Figure 251

This plain brass plate of unusually fine manufacture is very definitely a stock pattern which could have been sold without ornament or, as was more likely, with a center device added by soldering or brazing. The plate was cast in three pieces, with the round center brazed to the belt attachment. It was bench-fitted, as indicated by the numbers on the reverse of the inner and outer rings.

This simple brass plate is made with an unusually high quality and is clearly a standard design that could have been sold without any decoration or, more likely, with a center piece added through soldering or brazing. The plate was made in three parts, with the round center attached to the belt. It was custom-fitted, as shown by the numbers on the back of the inner and outer rings.

(p. 115) WASTE-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 60498-M (S-K 254). Figure 252.

USNM 60498-M (S-K 254). Figure 252.

Figure 252

Figure 252

This is a typical stock pattern with the company designation "E." Other specimens in the national collections have the letters "D," "F," "K," and "R." Although rather crudely cast in brass, this piece has been bench-fitted and then gilded.

This is a common stock pattern with the company label "E." Other examples in the national collections have the letters "D," "F," "K," and "R." Even though it's somewhat roughly cast in brass, this piece has been bench-fitted and then gold-plated.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 60492-M (S-K 248). Figure 253.

USNM 60492-M (S-K 248). Figure 253.

Figure 253

Figure 253

This is another stock pattern with company designation. In this case, the numeral "1" has been applied with wire fasteners rather than cast integrally with the two portions of the plate. The national collections also contain similar plates with the numerals "2," "26," and "36."

This is another standard pattern with the company's name. In this case, the number "1" has been attached using wire fasteners instead of being cast in as part of the two sections of the plate. The national collections also include similar plates with the numbers "2," "26," and "36."

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 60468-M (S-K 224). Figure 254.

USNM 60468-M (S-K 224). Figure 254.

Figure 254

Figure 254

This is another typical stock pattern with the eagle-on-shield device surrounded by 13 5-pointed stars as the center ornament. It is cast in brass in two pieces. An example of this plate, on a belt, formed part of a cased Sharps rifle outfit displayed at the 1960 National Rifle Association meeting in Washington, D.C.

This is another typical stock design featuring the eagle-on-shield emblem surrounded by 13 five-pointed stars as the main decoration. It is cast in brass in two pieces. An example of this plate, attached to a belt, was part of a cased Sharps rifle set displayed at the 1960 National Rifle Association meeting in Washington, D.C.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, MUSICIAN, C. 1850

USNM 60499-M (S-K 255). Figure 255.

USNM 60499-M (S-K 255). Figure 255.

Figure 255

Figure 255

The musician's lyre has never been strictly a military ornament, being widely worn by civilian bands; thus, this plate cannot precisely be identified as military or nonmilitary. Unlike most plates of this type and period, the entire piece is struck in brass rather than cast.

The musician's lyre has never just been a military decoration; it's commonly worn by civilian bands, so this plate can't be clearly classified as military or nonmilitary. Unlike most plates from this type and time, this whole piece is made from brass instead of being cast.

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 60485-M (S-K 241). Figure 256.

USNM 60485-M (S-K 241). Figure 256.

Figure 256

Figure 256

The letters "T C B" on this brass-cast plate open wide the doors of conjecture as to interpretation. Possible combinations range from Trenton City Blues (if such a Militia organization ever existed) to Troy Cornet Band, a nonmilitary unit. Plates such as this can seldom be positively identified.

The letters "T C B" on this brass plate spark a lot of speculation about their meaning. Possible interpretations vary from Trenton City Blues (if that militia group ever existed) to Troy Cornet Band, which was a non-military group. Plates like this are rarely able to be definitively identified.

(p. 116) WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 60478-M (S-K 234). Figure 257.

USNM 60478-M (S-K 234). Figure 257.

Figure 257

Figure 257

As in the case of the preceding plate, the letters "H R" on this specimen cannot be specifically identified. Similar unidentified plates in the national collections have the letters "S O I" and "P B."

As with the previous plate, the letters "H R" on this specimen can't be specifically identified. Similar unidentified plates in the national collections have the letters "S O I" and "P B."

WAIST-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 604167-M (S-K 323). Figure 258.

USNM 604167-M (S-K 323). Figure 258.

Figure 258

Figure 258

This plate is known both in heavy metal stamping and in thin, cheap brass. Examples of the latter type appear to have been struck in the period of the 1890's from a die then 50 years old. A plate similar to this one has been excavated from a Civil War battlefield site. A stock pattern, the design was obsolete for (p. 117) issue to Militia before the Civil War, but it is known to have been continued almost to the end of the century for use by groups such as secondary school cadet corps.

This plate is found in both heavy metal stamping and in thin, inexpensive brass. Examples of the latter seem to have been produced in the 1890s using a die that was already 50 years old. A plate like this one has been dug up from a Civil War battlefield site. This is a standard pattern; the design was outdated for (p. 117) use by the Militia before the Civil War, but it’s known to have been used nearly until the end of the century by groups like secondary school cadet corps.

¶ The shoulder-belt plates worn in the 1850's were little changed from those of the preceding decade. In the Regular Establishment the shoulder belt and plate for officers had been discarded in favor of the waist belt for carrying the sword, but Militia officers—bound by no regulations—continued to wear the shoulder belt. Enlisted personnel wore at least one shoulder belt, and in many cases used two belts, which crossed, one belt carrying the cartridge box and the other the bayonet and scabbard. Mounted Militia sometimes wore the saber on a waist belt and the carbine cartridge box on a shoulder belt. It is interesting to note that the custom of using elements of state seals on waist-belt plates was not followed to any great extent in the embellishment of shoulder-belt plates except in the Southern States.

¶ The shoulder belt plates worn in the 1850s were not much different from those of the previous decade. In the Regular Establishment, officers had shifted from using the shoulder belt and plate to a waist belt for carrying their sword, but Militia officers—who weren't bound by any rules—continued to use the shoulder belt. Enlisted personnel wore at least one shoulder belt, and often used two belts that crossed, with one carrying the cartridge box and the other the bayonet and scabbard. Mounted Militia sometimes wore the saber on a waist belt and the carbine cartridge box on a shoulder belt. It's interesting to note that the practice of incorporating elements of state seals on waist-belt plates wasn't really common in the decoration of shoulder-belt plates, except in the Southern States.

CARTRIDGE-BOX-BELT PLATE, SOUTH CAROLINA, C. 1845(?)

USNM 604451-M (S-K 598). Figure 259.

USNM 604451-M (S-K 598). Figure 259.

Figure 259

Figure 259

In size and pattern this plate is exactly like that prescribed for the Regular Establishment in 1841, substituting the arms of South Carolina for the eagle. It possibly may date as early as 1845. Made for South Carolina Militia, plates similar to this were worn during the Civil War and several have been recovered from battlefield sites. The specimen is struck in brass and the reverse filled with lead. It has three bent-wire fasteners imbedded in the reverse, which indicates that it was decorative rather than functional. A similar plate with elements of the Virginia State seal is known. Modern reproductions of both are being sold.

In size and design, this plate is exactly like the one specified for the Regular Establishment in 1841, replacing the eagle with the arms of South Carolina. It might date back to as early as 1845. Made for the South Carolina Militia, plates similar to this were worn during the Civil War, and several have been found at battlefield sites. This specimen is made of brass, with the back filled with lead. It has three bent-wire fasteners attached to the back, indicating it was meant for decoration rather than for use. A similar plate featuring elements of the Virginia State seal is known. Modern reproductions of both are currently being sold.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 604446-M (S-K 593). Figure 260.

USNM 604446-M (S-K 593). Figure 260.

Figure 260

Figure 260

A popular stock pattern of the 1850's, this design with the silver numeral "1" on a rectangle of rolled brass was worn for at least half a century after it first appeared. Similar plates are known with all numerals through 9 and a few higher numbers. Other plates of the same general type are known with company letters "A" through "M." The plate proper is fitted with two brass wire hooks and a medium width tongue, indicating a functional use. The numeral is attached by means of two staples with leather thongs reeved through on the reverse of the plate.

A popular stock pattern from the 1850s, this design features the silver numeral "1" on a rectangle of rolled brass and was worn for at least fifty years after it first came out. Similar plates are known with all the numerals up to 9 and a few higher numbers. Other plates of the same general type are known with company letters "A" through "M." The plate itself is equipped with two brass wire hooks and a medium-width tongue, indicating practical use. The numeral is attached using two staples with leather thongs threaded through on the back of the plate.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 654360-M (S-K 516). Figure 261.

USNM 654360-M (S-K 516). Figure 261.

Figure 261

Figure 261

This rolled-brass plate with its silver "TC" monogram is presently unidentified. In the national (p. 118) collections there is a Militia helmet with the same device used as part of the cap plate; also known is another insignia, comprising the monogram alone, that was used as a cartridge-box device. New York Military Magazine for July 17, 1841, refers to the elegant armory of the Troy [N.Y.] Corps where the Light Guard of New York had been visitors. This plate may have been an insignia of that organization. The monogram is affixed with staples and leather thongs, and the plate proper carries a large safety pin soldered to the reverse for purely decorative attachment. It is unknown whether the safety pin fasteners are contemporary with the plates to which they are attached. Rudimentary safety pins were known in Egypt before Christ, but they apparently did not appear in America until the 1830's and 1840's. Walter Hunt patented the first American safety pin in 1849.[144]

This rolled-brass plate with its silver "TC" monogram is currently unidentified. In the national (p. 118) collections, there is a Militia helmet featuring the same device as part of the cap plate; another insignia, which consists of just the monogram, was also used as a cartridge-box device. The New York Military Magazine from July 17, 1841, mentions the elegant armory of the Troy [N.Y.] Corps, which the Light Guard of New York visited. This plate may have been an insignia of that group. The monogram is attached with staples and leather thongs, and the plate itself has a large safety pin soldered to the back for purely decorative purposes. It is unclear if the safety pin fasteners date back to the plates they are attached to. Basic safety pins were used in Egypt before Christ, but they seem to have only appeared in America in the 1830s and 1840s. Walter Hunt patented the first American safety pin in 1849.[144]

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 604361-M (S-K 517). Figure 262.

USNM 604361-M (S-K 517). Figure 262.

Figure 262

Figure 262

Several Militia organizations of the 1840's and 1850's were called "Republican Guards," and this silver "RG" monogram on a rolled-brass rectangle would have been appropriate on shoulder belts of so-named units. The monogram is affixed with wire fasteners, but the means of attachment for the plate proper are missing.

Several militia groups from the 1840s and 1850s were called "Republican Guards," and this silver "RG" monogram on a rolled-brass rectangle would have been suitable for shoulder belts of those units. The monogram is attached with wire fasteners, but the method for securing the plate itself is missing.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 604362 (S-K 518). Figure 263.

USNM 604362 (S-K 518). Figure 263.

Figure 263

Figure 263

The silver letters "GG" on this rolled-brass plate present several possibilities for identification. Among (p. 119) the uniformed Militia units of the 1840's and 1850's were Garibaldi Guards, German Guards, and Gray Guards. This piece could have been the device of any of the three. The letters are affixed with wire fasteners, and a safety pin is soldered to the rear of the plate proper for decorative attachment.

The silver letters "GG" on this rolled-brass plate offer several options for identification. Among (p. 119) the uniformed militia units of the 1840s and 1850s were the Garibaldi Guards, German Guards, and Gray Guards. This piece could have belonged to any of the three. The letters are attached with wire fasteners, and a safety pin is soldered to the back of the plate for decorative attachment.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 604363-M (S-K 519). Figure 264.

USNM 604363-M (S-K 519). Figure 264.

Figure 264

Figure 264

This oval brass plate with the wire-affixed silver-on-copper letters "AG" is unidentified, but it might well have been worn by the American Guards, or by a uniformed company from some city as Atlanta or Albany, with the letter "G" representing "Grays," "Guards," "Grenadiers," or the like. It was attached to the belt with three simple wire fasteners.

This oval brass plate with the wire-attached silver-on-copper letters "AG" is unidentified, but it could have been worn by the American Guards or by a uniformed company from a city like Atlanta or Albany, with the letter "G" possibly standing for "Grays," "Guards," "Grenadiers," or something similar. It was secured to the belt with three simple wire fasteners.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 604335-M (S-K 491). Figure 265.

USNM 604335-M (S-K 491). Figure 265.

Figure 265

Figure 265

The white-metal device on this brass plate comprises elements of the arms of "New Amsterdam" topped by the crest of the arms of New York State with supporting figures representing the original Indian owner of Manhattan Island and the mariner who became the first white settler. The specimen is believed to have been worn by the New York City Guard. The device is affixed with three staples originally intended to be reeved through with leather thongs, although now bent over. The means of attachment of the plate proper are missing.

The white-metal piece on this brass plate includes elements of the "New Amsterdam" coat of arms, topped by the crest of New York State. It features supporting figures representing the original Native American owner of Manhattan Island and the mariner who was the first white settler. This item is thought to have been worn by the New York City Guard. The piece is attached with three staples that were originally meant to hold leather thongs, although they are now bent over. The way the plate is attached is no longer present.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 604364-M (S-K 520). Figure 266.

USNM 604364-M (S-K 520). Figure 266.

Figure 266

Figure 266

The letters "K L G" forming the white-metal monogram on this brass plate indicate that it could well have been worn by the Kentish Light Guard of Rhode Island. The monogram is attached by means of two staples with thongs reeved through, and the plate proper is fitted with four similar staples. The reverse bears the hallmark of William H. Horstmann and Sons, well-known military outfitters of Philadelphia.

The letters "K L G" that make up the white-metal monogram on this brass plate suggest it might have been used by the Kentish Light Guard of Rhode Island. The monogram is secured with two staples and thongs threaded through, and the plate itself is attached with four similar staples. The back features the hallmark of William H. Horstmann and Sons, a well-known military supplier in Philadelphia.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 604336-M (S-K 492). Figure 267.

USNM 604336-M (S-K 492). Figure 267.

Figure 267

Figure 267

The white-metal letters "SG" on this brass plate lend themselves to so many interpretations that no identification is attempted. The applied device has two staples for attachment, and the plate proper is fitted with a safety pin on the reverse.

The white-metal letters "SG" on this brass plate can be interpreted in so many ways that no attempt is made to identify them

(p. 120) SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 604338-M (S-K 494). Figure 268.

USNM 604338-M (S-K 494). Figure 268.

Figure 268

Figure 268

Many volunteer companies used the designation "Rifle Guards," and this plate with the initials "C R G" probably falls into such a category. The (p. 121) "C," of course, cannot be identified. The monogram is of pewter and has three round lugs fitted through holes in the plate proper for attachment with pins. The plate itself has a safety pin soldered to the reverse for attachment.

Many volunteer groups called themselves "Rifle Guards," so this plate with the initials "C R G" likely belongs to that category. The (p. 121) "C" can't be identified, of course. The monogram is made of pewter and has three round lugs that fit through holes in the plate for attachment with pins. The plate itself has a safety pin soldered to the back for attachment.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, SCOTT LEGION(?), C. 1850

USNM 604347-M (S-K 503). Figure 269.

USNM 604347-M (S-K 503). Figure 269.

Figure 269

Figure 269

Although this plate bearing the profile of Gen. Winfield Scott is very similar in design and construction to several bearing the head of Washington and dated much earlier, it is believed to postdate the War with Mexico when Scott's popularity was at its zenith. There were several volunteer units called "Scott Legion" during this period. The piece was struck, with a tin backing applied, and the edges of the obverse were then crimped over. It is fitted with three wire staples for attachment.

Although this plate featuring the profile of Gen. Winfield Scott looks very similar in design and construction to several plates showing George Washington that were made much earlier, it's thought to have been made after the War with Mexico when Scott was at the height of his popularity. During this time, there were several volunteer units called "Scott Legion." The item was made with a tin backing applied, and the edges of the front were then crimped over. It has three wire staples for attachment.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, C. 1850

USNM 604327-M (S-K 483). Figure 270.

USNM 604327-M (S-K 483). Figure 270.

Figure 270

Figure 270

This is a stock pattern in cast brass. It is oval with raised edges and has a white-metal "F" applied with simple wire fasteners. Although the piece has the appearance of a waist-belt plate or cartridge-box plate, the wire fasteners on the reverse indicate that it was intended for shoulder-belt wear. In the national collections is a similar plate with the letter "I," indicating that the letters designate companies of larger units rather than a unit itself.

This is a standard pattern in cast brass. It's oval with raised edges and has a white-metal "F" attached with simple wire fasteners. Even though it looks like a waist-belt plate or cartridge-box plate, the wire fasteners on the back show that it was meant to be worn on the shoulder belt. In the national collections, there’s a similar plate with the letter "I," suggesting that these letters refer to companies within larger units rather than a unit itself.

SHOULDER-BELT PLATE, ARTILLERY, C. 1850

USNM 604356-M (S-K 512). Figure 271.

USNM 604356-M (S-K 512). Figure 271.

Figure 271

Figure 271

This rolled-brass plate with a wire-applied silvered "A" and pile of cannon balls topped by the hand die-struck motto "ALWAYS READY" is unidentified beyond the fact that it was worn by a member of Company A of a Militia unit using a popular motto. Similar specimens in the national collections have center letters "B," "D," and "E." The plate was attached to the shoulder belt by means of two flat brass fasteners soldered to the reverse. The fasteners are almost as wide as the plate itself.

This rolled brass plate features a wire-applied silvered "A" and a pile of cannonballs topped with the hand die-struck motto "Always prepared." We don't know much about it other than that it was worn by a member of Company A from a Militia unit that used this popular motto. Similar items in national collections have center letters "B," "D," and "E." The plate was attached to the shoulder belt using two flat brass fasteners soldered to the back, and these fasteners are almost as wide as the plate itself.

BALDRIC DEVICE, C. 1850

USNM 60409-M (S-K 165). Figure 272.

USNM 60409-M (S-K 165). Figure 272.

Figure 272

Figure 272

The baldric is a highly ornamented wide sash normally worn by drum majors and sometimes by band leaders. During at least part of the Civil War, baldrics were worn by some aides-de-camp, and the 1902 uniform regulations specified them for Signal Corps officers. This specimen and the one that follows are the earlier of several examples in the national collections; they fall in the early 1850's. The shield, suspended from a lion's mouth by small chains, carries an eagle with a shield on its breast. The stars and edge of clouds, above, are somewhat similar to (p. 122) those on the 1851 regulation waist-belt plate. The whole is superimposed on a three-quarter sunburst. Both the lion's head and the shield are fitted with simple wire fasteners for attachment.

The baldric is a decorative wide sash typically worn by drum majors and occasionally by band leaders. During part of the Civil War, some aides-de-camp also wore baldrics, and the 1902 uniform regulations specified them for Signal Corps officers. This example and the next one are some of the earliest instances in the national collections, dating back to the early 1850s. The shield, hanging from a lion's mouth by small chains, features an eagle with a shield on its chest. The stars and cloud edges above are somewhat similar to those on the (p. 122) 1851 regulation waist-belt plate. The entire design is set against a three-quarter sunburst. Both the lion's head and the shield are secured with simple wire fasteners for attachment.

BALDRIC DEVICE AND BALDRIC, C. 1850

USNM 66622-M. Figure 273.

USNM 66622-M. Fig. 273.

Figure 273

Figure 273

The device is attached to a red, gold-edged-embroidered baldric worn by the drum major of the 72d New York Militia during the Civil War but believed to ante-date 1861. The brass shield, with ebony drum sticks, is suspended from an eagle of the 1834 Regular Army pattern for wear as a cap device. The shield, convex with beveled edges, is very similar to waist-belt and shoulder-belt plates of about 1850.

The device is attached to a red baldric with gold edges, worn by the drum major of the 72nd New York Militia during the Civil War, but it is believed to be from before 1861. The brass shield, featuring ebony drumsticks, hangs from an eagle design used by the Regular Army since 1834 for wearing as a cap device. The shield, which is curved with beveled edges, closely resembles waist and shoulder belt plates from around 1850.

¶ Few Militia gorgets are known, and this scarcity leads us to believe that few were made and worn, despite the Militia's love for the "gay and gaudy." Still, some units did adopt them, and officers of the Portland [Maine] Rifle Corps were still wearing them (p. 123) in the late 1850's.[145] As a military symbol for officers, the gorget passed its zenith in the late 18th century. Gorgets were worn during the War of the Revolution by both American and British officers, and the British also gave them to Indian chiefs as marks of authority. Officers in at least one regiment of the Regular Establishment wore them as part of their regulation dress about the turn of the 19th century, but they were not a part of the prescribed uniform during or after the War of 1812.

¶ Few militia gorgets are known, and this rarity makes us think that not many were made and worn, even though the militia had a fondness for the "bright and flashy." However, some units did adopt them, and officers of the Portland [Maine] Rifle Corps were still wearing them (p. 123) in the late 1850s.[145] As a military symbol for officers, the gorget reached its peak in the late 18th century. Gorgets were worn during the Revolutionary War by both American and British officers, and the British also presented them to Indian chiefs as symbols of authority. Officers in at least one regiment of the Regular Establishment wore them as part of their standard dress around the turn of the 19th century, but they were not included in the official uniform during or after the War of 1812.

GORGET, C. 1821(?)

USNM 60311-M (S-K 67B). Figure 274.

USNM 60311-M (S-K 67B). Figure 274.

Figure 274

Figure 274

This gorget, of gilded brass, is of 2-piece construction. The eagle-on-clouds, very similar to cockade eagles worn in 1808-1821, is attached by four wire fasteners rather than brazed. The engraved edging on the gorget proper is rather crudely done. Although composite insignia did not come into general use until the mid-1830's, it seems reasonable to assume that this particular design of the eagle device applied to the chapeau might equally have been applied to a gorget. A similar specimen in the national collections has a silver-on-copper eagle instead of a brass one.

This gorget, made of gilded brass, has a 2-piece design. The eagle on clouds, which closely resembles cockade eagles worn between 1808 and 1821, is secured by four wire fasteners instead of being brazed. The engraved edge on the gorget itself is somewhat roughly done. While composite insignia didn't become common until the mid-1830s, it seems reasonable to think that this specific eagle design used on the chapeau could have also been used on a gorget. A similar piece in the national collections features a silver-on-copper eagle instead of a brass one.

GORGET, C. 1830-1840

USNM 60310-M (S-K 67A). Figure 275.

USNM 60310-M (S-K 67A). Figure 275.

Figure 275

Figure 275

This gorget is of 3-piece construction, the specimen proper being of brass and the wreath and eagle of gilded brass applied with wire fasteners. Although the eagle is of the early "on-clouds" design, the feel of the piece is later, and this, together with the rather wide crescent indicate that it belongs to the period of the 1830's and 1840's.

This gorget has a 3-piece design, with the main part made of brass and the wreath and eagle made of gilded brass attached with wire fasteners. Even though the eagle features the early "on-clouds" design, the overall vibe of the piece feels more modern, and the fairly wide crescent suggests it dates back to the 1830s and 1840s.

GORGET, STATE FENCIBLES, NEW YORK, C. 1840-1850

USNM 60309-M (S-K 66). Figure 276.

USNM 60309-M (S-K 66). Figure 276.

Figure 276

Figure 276

This brass gorget, with wreath and letters in applied silver, is an example of one of the later (p. 124) types worn by Militia. The letters "S F" are interpreted as "State Fencibles," and the "Excelsior" buttons on the ends of the crescent identify the origin of the unit as New York State. Fencibles were basically troop units organized for home defense only. There was a volunteer Militia company called the "State Fencibles" in New York City as early as 1800. It apparently lost its identity as such in 1847 or 1848 when the organization split, half entering the 8th Regiment and half entering the 9th Regiment of New York State Militia.[146]

This brass gorget, featuring a wreath and letters in silver, is an example of one of the later (p. 124) styles worn by the Militia. The letters "S F" stand for "State Fencibles," and the "Excelsior" buttons on the ends of the crescent indicate that the unit originated from New York State. Fencibles were essentially troops organized for home defense only. There was a volunteer Militia company called the "State Fencibles" in New York City as early as 1800. It seems to have lost its identity around 1847 or 1848 when the group split, with half joining the 8th Regiment and the other half joining the 9th Regiment of New York State Militia.[146]

U.S. Government Printing Office: 1963

U.S. Government Printing Office: 1963

Notes

1: Parkyn's Shoulder-Belt Plates and Buttons contains a wealth of information on British regimental devices.

1: Parkyn's Shoulder-Belt Plates and Buttons has a lot of information on British regimental symbols.

2: For history of the organization of the Army, see American Military History, 1607-1953; Mahon, "History of the Organization of the United States Infantry"; and Jones, "History of the Organization of the United States Field Artillery."

2: For the history of how the Army was organized, check out American Military History, 1607-1953; Mahon, "History of the Organization of the United States Infantry"; and Jones, "History of the Organization of the United States Field Artillery."

Unfortunately, there is no single, completely satisfactory source on the militia system of the United States. The following works, however, contain sound information and, when taken together, provide an excellent background on the subject: Todd, "Our National Guard"; Mahon, "Citizen Soldier"; Lundeberg, "History of the North Carolina Militia"; Ansell, "Legal and Historical Aspects of the Militia"; Gronert, "First National Pastime in the Middle West"; and Riker, Soldiers of the States.

Unfortunately, there isn't one definitive source on the militia system in the United States. However, the following works contain reliable information and, when combined, offer a great background on the topic: Todd, "Our National Guard"; Mahon, "Citizen Soldier"; Lundeberg, "History of the North Carolina Militia"; Ansell, "Legal and Historical Aspects of the Militia"; Gronert, "First National Pastime in the Middle West"; and Riker, Soldiers of the States.

3: Writings of George Washington, vol. 27, p. 222.

3: The Writings of George Washington, vol. 27, p. 222.

4: Ibid., pp. 256-258; also letter dated January 3, 1784, from Henry Knox, Commander in Chief of the Army, to President of the Continental Congress (in Knox papers).

4: Ibid., pp. 256-258; also a letter from Henry Knox, Commander in Chief of the Army, to the President of the Continental Congress, dated January 3, 1784 (in Knox papers).

5: Journals of the Continental Congress, vol. 27, p. 524; also, Upton, p. 69.

5: Journals of the Continental Congress, vol. 27, p. 524; also, Upton, p. 69.

6: Act of March 3, 1791 (Military Laws, pp. 90-91).

6: Act of March 3, 1791 (Military Laws, pp. 90-91).

7: Act of March 5, 1792 (Military Laws, pp. 92-94).

7: Act of March 5, 1792 (Military Laws, pp. 92-94).

8: American State Papers, pp. 40-41.

8: American State Papers, pp. 40-41.

9: Act of May 9, 1794 (Military Laws, p. 104).

9: Act of May 9, 1794 (Military Laws, p. 104).

10: Act of May 30, 1796 (Military Laws, p. 114).

10: Act of May 30, 1796 (Military Laws, p. 114).

11: Act of April 27, 1798 (Military Laws, pp. 119-120).

11: Act of April 27, 1798 (Military Laws, pp. 119-120).

12: Acts of July 16, 1798, and March 2, 1799 (Military Laws, pp. 127-128).

12: Laws from July 16, 1798, and March 2, 1799 (Military Laws, pp. 127-128).

13: American State Papers, p. 137.

13: American State Papers, p. 137.

14: Acts of February 20 and May 14, 1800 (Military Laws, pp. 139, 141); also, American State Papers, p. 139.

14: Laws from February 20 and May 14, 1800 (Military Laws, pp. 139, 141); also, American State Papers, p. 139.

15: Act of March 16, 1802 (Military Laws, pp. 141-149).

15: Act of March 16, 1802 (Military Laws, pp. 141-149).

16: Act of April 12, 1808 (Military Laws, pp. 200-203).

16: Act of April 12, 1808 (Military Laws, pp. 200-203).

17: Acts of January 11, April 23, and June 26, 1812 (Military Laws, pp. 212-215, 222-223, 230).

17: Laws from January 11, April 23, and June 26, 1812 (Military Laws, pp. 212-215, 222-223, 230).

18: Act of January 1813 (Military Laws, pp. 238-240). There is some confusion as to just how many infantry regiments were organized and actually came into being. The Act of January 29, 1813, authorized the President to raise such regiments of infantry as he should see fit, "not exceeding twenty." It seems that 19 were actually formed, made up partly of 1-year men and partly of 5-year men. There are 46 regiments listed in the Army Register for January 1, 1815, and it is known that several volunteer regiments were designated as units of the Regular Establishment and that a 47th and a 48th were redesignated as lower numbered units when several regiments were consolidated because of low recruitment rate. Mahon (in "History of the Organization of the United States Infantry") is not clear on this point. There is an organizational chart of the Army for this period in the files of the Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army.

18: Act of January 1813 (Military Laws, pp. 238-240). There's some confusion about how many infantry regiments were actually created. The Act of January 29, 1813, allowed the President to raise as many regiments of infantry as deemed necessary, "not exceeding twenty." It appears that 19 were formed, comprised of both 1-year and 5-year enlistees. The Army Register lists 46 regiments as of January 1, 1815, and it's known that several volunteer regiments were designated as part of the Regular Establishment. Additionally, the 47th and 48th regiments were renumbered when some regiments were combined due to low recruitment. Mahon (in "History of the Organization of the United States Infantry") isn’t clear on this matter. An organizational chart of the Army for this period can be found in the files of the Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army.

19: Act of February 10, 1814 (Military Laws, pp. 251-252).

19: Act of February 10, 1814 (Military Laws, pp. 251-252).

20: Act of March 30, 1814 (Military Laws, pp. 252-255); Jones, p. 58; "History of the Organization of the United States Cavalry."

20: Act of March 30, 1814 (Military Laws, pp. 252-255); Jones, p. 58; "History of the Organization of the United States Cavalry."

21: Act of March 3, 1815 (Military Laws, pp. 266-267).

21: Act of March 3, 1815 (Military Laws, pp. 266-267).

22: The reorganization of 1815 is treated by Mahon "History of the Organization of the United States Infantry" (pp. 11-12), Jones "History of the Organization of the United States Field Artillery" (pp. 59-60), and Wike, unpublished study.

22: The reorganization of 1815 is discussed by Mahon in "History of the Organization of the United States Infantry" (pp. 11-12), Jones in "History of the Organization of the United States Field Artillery" (pp. 59-60), and Wikie, in an unpublished study.

23: Act of March 2, 1821 (Military Laws, pp. 303-309).

23: Act of March 2, 1821 (Military Laws, pp. 303-309).

24: Acts of April 5 and June 15, 1832 (Military Laws, pp. 322-323, 325-326).

24: Acts from April 5 and June 15, 1832 (Military Laws, pp. 322-323, 325-326).

25: Act of March 2, 1833 (Military Laws, pp. 329-330).

25: Act of March 2, 1833 (Military Laws, pp. 329-330).

26: Act of May 23, 1836 (Military Laws, pp. 336-337).

26: Act of May 23, 1836 (Military Laws, pp. 336-337).

27: Act of July 5, 1838 (Military Laws, pp. 341-349).

27: Act of July 5, 1838 (Military Laws, pp. 341-349).

28: Act of May 19, 1846 (Military Laws, pp. 371-372).

28: Act of May 19, 1846 (Military Laws, pp. 371-372).

29: Act of February 11, 1847 (Military Laws, pp. 379-382).

29: Act of February 11, 1847 (Military Laws, pp. 379-382).

30: Mahon, "History of the Organization of the United States Infantry," p. 16.

30: Mahon, "History of the Organization of the United States Infantry," p. 16.

31: Official Army Register, 1848.

31: Official Army Register, 1848.

32: Upton, p. 223.

32: Upton, p. 223.

33: General Orders, March 30, 1800 (Records AGO).

33: General Orders, March 30, 1800 (Records AGO).

34: Standing Order Book, folio 1, October 1, 1801.

34: Standing Order Book, page 1, October 1, 1801.

35: Records AGO.

35: AGO Records.

36: Records AGO.

36: AGO Records.

37: General Order, Southern Department, U.S. Army, January 24, 1813 (photostatic copy in files of division of military history, Smithsonian Institution); also, American State Papers, p. 434.

37: General Order, Southern Department, U.S. Army, January 24, 1813 (photostat copy in military history division files, Smithsonian Institution); also, American State Papers, p. 434.

38: Specimen no. 156 in Johnson, vol. 1, p. 43, vol. 2, p. 9.

38: Specimen no. 156 in Johnson, vol. 1, p. 43, vol. 2, p. 9.

39: Todd, "Three Leather Cockades," pp. 24-25.

39: Todd, "Three Leather Cockades," pp. 24-25.

40: General Order, March 30, 1800 (Records AGO).

40: General Order, March 30, 1800 (Records AGO).

41: "Statement of Articles of Clothing, 1802," in papers of Purveyor of Public Supplies (Records AGO).

41: "List of Clothing Items, 1802," in the documents of Purveyor of Public Supplies (Records AGO).

42: General Order, Southern Department, U.S. Army, January 24, 1813 (photostatic copy in files of division of military history, Smithsonian Institution); also, American State Papers, p. 434.

42: General Order, Southern Department, U.S. Army, January 24, 1813 (photostatic copy in files of division of military history, Smithsonian Institution); also, American State Papers, p. 434.

43: Engraved by Robert Scott after a design by Gilbert Stuart.

43: Engraved by Robert Scott after a design by Gilbert Stuart.

44: Todd, "Notes on the Dress," p. 10. Also, receipts from George Green and Son, and letter dated August 6, 1808, from J. Smith (Commissary General at Washington) to Tench Coxe requesting "brass letters U.S.R.R." (Records AGO). George Green is listed in Philadelphia directories of the period as a "brass founder and gilder."

44: Todd, "Notes on the Dress," p. 10. Also, receipts from George Green and Son, and a letter dated August 6, 1808, from J. Smith (Commissary General in Washington) to Tench Coxe requesting "brass letters U.S.R.R." (Records AGO). George Green is listed in Philadelphia directories from that time as a "brass founder and gilder."

45: Letter dated July 8, 1812, from J. Burn to William Eustis (Secretary of War) and letter dated July 9, 1812, from B. Mifflin (Deputy Commissary General of Purchases). Both letters are in Records AGO.

45: Letter dated July 8, 1812, from J. Burn to William Eustis (Secretary of War) and letter dated July 9, 1812, from B. Mifflin (Deputy Commissary General of Purchases). Both letters are in Records AGO.

46: General Orders, January 24, 1813 (Records AGO).

46: General Orders, January 24, 1813 (Records AGO).

47: Letter dated March 30, 1812, from Coxe to Eustis (Records AGO); McBarron, "Regiment of Riflemen," p. 100.

47: Letter dated March 30, 1812, from Coxe to Eustis (Records AGO); McBarron, "Regiment of Riflemen," p. 100.

48: Bill dated February 24, 1812, from William Crumpton (Records AGO).

48: Bill dated February 24, 1812, from William Crumpton (Records AGO).

49: Letter dated August 31, 1812, from Eustis to Irvine; General Order of January 24, 1813, Southern Department; letter dated March 31, 1813, from Irvine to Amasa Stetson (Deputy Commissary General of Purchases, Boston); and letter dated July 13, 1813, from Irvine to M. T. Wickham. This material is in Records AGO.

49: Letter dated August 31, 1812, from Eustis to Irvine; General Order from January 24, 1813, Southern Department; letter dated March 31, 1813, from Irvine to Amasa Stetson (Deputy Commissary General of Purchases, Boston); and letter dated July 13, 1813, from Irvine to M. T. Wickham. This material is in Records AGO.

50: Letter from Irvine to Wickham dated July 13, 1813, and bill from William Crumpton dated February 24, 1812 (both in Records AGO).

50: Letter from Irvine to Wickham dated July 13, 1813, and bill from William Crumpton dated February 24, 1812 (both in Records AGO).

51: Statement of purchases for September 1813, by Stetson (Records AGO).

51: Statement of purchases for September 1813, by Stetson (Records AGO).

52: Bill dated February 24, 1812, from William Crumpton (Records AGO).

52: Bill dated February 24, 1812, from William Crumpton (Records AGO).

53: Letter dated November 8, 1812, from Irvine to Colonel Simonds (Commanding Officer, 6th Infantry); letter dated November 3, 1812, from Irvine to Colonel Pike (Commanding Officer, 15th Infantry); and letter dated November 23, 1812, from Irvine to Armitage. These letters are in Records AGO.

53: Letter dated November 8, 1812, from Irvine to Colonel Simonds (Commander, 6th Infantry); letter dated November 3, 1812, from Irvine to Colonel Pike (Commander, 15th Infantry); and letter dated November 23, 1812, from Irvine to Armitage. These letters are in Records AGO.

54: Letter from Irvine to Simonds cited in preceding note.

54: Letter from Irvine to Simonds mentioned in the previous note.

55: Letter in Records AGO.

55: Letter in AGO Records.

56: "A Bit of U.S. Mint History," pp. 45-50; and Chamberlain, pp. 588-592.

56: "A Bit of U.S. Mint History," pp. 45-50; and Chamberlain, pp. 588-592.

57: Letter in Records AGO.

57: Letter in Records AGO.

58: Letter from Secretary of War to Irvine (Records AGO).

58: Letter from the Secretary of War to Irvine (Records AGO).

59: Letters in Records AGO.

59: Letters in Records AGO.

60: Letters in Records AGO: Irvine to James Calhoun (Deputy Commissary General of Purchases, Baltimore), January 14, 1815; Irvine to General Scott, January 13, 1815; Irvine to George Armitage, July 10, 1815.

60: Letters in Records AGO: Irvine to James Calhoun (Deputy Commissary General of Purchases, Baltimore), January 14, 1815; Irvine to General Scott, January 13, 1815; Irvine to George Armitage, July 10, 1815.

61: See McBarron, "The 18th U.S. Infantry," pp. 48-49.

61: See McBarron, "The 18th U.S. Infantry," pp. 48-49.

62: See Johnson, vol. 1, p. 45, and vol. 2, p. 10.

62: See Johnson, vol. 1, p. 45, and vol. 2, p. 10.

63: See Johnson, vol. 2, specimen nos. 183, 184, 210-213.

63: See Johnson, vol. 2, specimen nos. 183, 184, 210-213.

64: Letter dated February 26, 1812, from Irvine to Secretary of War (Records AGO). In clothing returns for 1812 of light artillery companies stationed at Williamsville, N. Y., "caps and plates" are listed as being "on hand" (Records AGO).

64: Letter dated February 26, 1812, from Irvine to the Secretary of War (Records AGO). In the clothing returns for 1812 of light artillery companies stationed in Williamsville, N. Y., "caps and plates" are listed as being "available" (Records AGO).

65: Letter in Records AGO.

65: Letter in AGO Records.

66: See Kuhn, pp. 263-267, and Davis, pp. 13-14 and pl. 3.

66: See Kuhn, pp. 263-267, and Davis, pp. 13-14 and pl. 3.

67: Act of February 10, 1814 (Military Laws, pp. 251-252).

67: Act of February 10, 1814 (Military Laws, pp. 251-252).

68: Letter dated January 12, 1814, from Irvine to Secretary of War (Records AGO).

68: Letter dated January 12, 1814, from Irvine to the Secretary of War (Records AGO).

69: See Kivett, p. 59.

69: See Kivett, p. 59.

70: A letter dated July 29, 1817, from Irvine to Secretary of War describes the device; a letter dated August 4, 1817, from the Adjutant and Inspector General (Daniel Parker) to Irvine authorizes the plate but gives no description. Both letters are in Records AGO.

70: A letter dated July 29, 1817, from Irvine to the Secretary of War describes the device; a letter dated August 4, 1817, from the Adjutant and Inspector General (Daniel Parker) to Irvine approves the plate but provides no description. Both letters are in Records AGO.

71: See McClellan, pp. 25, 44.

71: See McClellan, pp. 25, 44.

72: General Regulations, pp. 154-162.

72: General Regulations, pp. 154-162.

73: Letter dated January 4, 1822, from Secretary of War to Irvine (Records AGO).

73: Letter dated January 4, 1822, from the Secretary of War to Irvine (Records AGO).

74: General Order No. 38, Headquarters of the Army, May 2, 1833. (Photostatic copy in files of division of military history, Smithsonian Institution.)

74: General Order No. 38, Army Headquarters, May 2, 1833. (Photocopy in the files of the Division of Military History, Smithsonian Institution.)

75: Townsend and Todd, pp. 1-2.

75: Townsend and Todd, pp. 1-2.

76: General Regulations for the Army of the United States, 1847, pp. 192-193.

76: General Regulations for the Army of the United States, 1847, pp. 192-193.

77: A detailed description is given in Military Collector and Historian (June 1952), vol. 4, no. 2, p. 44.

77: A detailed description can be found in Military Collector and Historian (June 1952), vol. 4, no. 2, p. 44.

78: A partial republication of this work appears in Military Collector and Historian, vol. 10, no. 1 (spring 1958), pp. 16, 17; no. 2 (summer 1958), pp. 43-45.

78: A partial reprint of this work can be found in Military Collector and Historian, vol. 10, no. 1 (spring 1958), pp. 16, 17; no. 2 (summer 1958), pp. 43-45.

79: Lewis, p. 64.

79: Lewis, p. 64.

80: Act of May 19, 1846 (Military Laws, pp. 371-372).

80: Act of May 19, 1846 (Military Laws, pp. 371-372).

81: General Order No. 18, June 4, 1846, War Department (photostatic copy in files of division of military history, Smithsonian Institution).

81: General Order No. 18, June 4, 1846, War Department (photostatic copy in files of the division of military history, Smithsonian Institution).

82: Insignia of the riflemen are discussed by Townsend and Todd, pp. 2-3.

82: Townsend and Todd discuss the insignia of the riflemen on pages 2-3.

83: General Order No. 2, February 13, 1850, War Department (photostatic copy in files of division of military history, Smithsonian Institution).

83: General Order No. 2, February 13, 1850, War Department (photostatic copy in files of division of military history, Smithsonian Institution).

84: General Order, Southern Department U.S. Army, January 24, 1813 (photostatic copy in files of division of military history, Smithsonian Institution).

84: General Order, Southern Department U.S. Army, January 24, 1813 (photostatic copy in files of the division of military history, Smithsonian Institution).

85: Letters from Irvine in Records AGO: To Colonel Bogardus (Commanding Officer, 41st Infantry), February 16, 1814; to James Calhoun, January 14, 1815; and to General Scott, January 31, 1815.

85: Letters from Irvine in Records AGO: To Colonel Bogardus (Commanding Officer, 41st Infantry), February 16, 1814; to James Calhoun, January 14, 1815; and to General Scott, January 31, 1815.

86: Letter to the Purveyor of Public Supplies in 1808.

86: Letter to the Public Supplies Provider in 1808.

87: Letters from Irvine in Records AGO: To Colonel Bogardus, February 16, 1814; to James Calhoun, January 14, 1815.

87: Letters from Irvine in Records AGO: To Colonel Bogardus, February 16, 1814; to James Calhoun, January 14, 1815.

88: Detailed descriptions of this sword are given by Harold L. Peterson, pp. 193-194, and Belote, pp. 30-31.

88: You can find detailed descriptions of this sword in the works of Harold L. Peterson, pages 193-194, and Belote, pages 30-31.

89: Mr. Michael Arpad, well known and highly regarded silversmith, of Washington, D.C., has called this specimen "an exquisite piece of work by a master craftsman."

89: Mr. Michael Arpad, a well-known and highly respected silversmith from Washington, D.C., has described this specimen as "an exquisite piece of work by a master craftsman."

90: General Regulations for the Army, pp. 154-162.

90: General Regulations for the Army, pp. 154-162.

91: General Regulations for the Army of the United States, p. 222.

91: General Regulations for the Army of the United States, p. 222.

92: Regulations for the Government of the Ordnance Department, p. 64; and Harold L. Peterson, pp. 42-43.

92: Rules for Managing the Ordnance Department, p. 64; and Harold L. Peterson, pp. 42-43.

93: See Patterson, p. 8.

93: See Patterson, p. 8.

94: General Order No. 38, Headquarters of the Army, May 2, 1833 (photostatic copy in files of the division of military history, Smithsonian Institution).

94: General Order No. 38, Army Headquarters, May 2, 1833 (photostat copy in the files of the Division of Military History, Smithsonian Institution).

95: U.S. Military Magazine (April 1841), illustrations for "United States Infantry, Full Dress" and "United States Artillery (Captain)."

95: U.S. Military Magazine (April 1841), illustrations for "U.S. Infantry, Full Dress" and "U.S. Artillery (Captain)."

96: See Military Collector and Historian (June 1950), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 29-30.

96: See Military Collector and Historian (June 1950), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 29-30.

97: Letter dated June 29, 1813, from Irvine to Secretary of War (Records AGO).

97: Letter dated June 29, 1813, from Irvine to the Secretary of War (Records AGO).

98: The cavalry waist-belt plate is actually specified to be 3.6 inches by 2.2 inches.

98: The cavalry waist-belt plate is specifically required to be 3.6 inches by 2.2 inches.

99: Regulations for the Uniform and Dress, pl. 21.

99: Rules for the Uniform and Dress, pl. 21.

100: Finke, pp. 71-73.

100: Finke, pp. 71-73.

101: Todd, "Three Leather Cockades," pp. 24-25.

101: Todd, "Three Leather Cockades," pp. 24-25.

102: Reproduced in Antiques (July 1947), vol. 52, no. 7, p. 16.

102: Reprinted in Antiques (July 1947), vol. 52, no. 7, p. 16.

103: Johnson, specimen nos. 101-105.

103: Johnson, sample nos. 101-105.

104: U.S. Military Magazine (March 1839), p. 4.

104: U.S. Military Magazine (March 1839), p. 4.

105: April 1839, pl. 5; June 1839, pl. 11.

105: April 1839, pl. 5; June 1839, pl. 11.

106: U.S. Military Magazine (March 1839), p. 3 and pl. 2.

106: U.S. Military Magazine (March 1839), p. 3 and pl. 2.

107: U.S. Military Magazine (October 1841), p. 32.

107: U.S. Military Magazine (October 1841), p. 32.

108: See U.S. Military Magazine (February 1840), pl. 29.

108: See U.S. Military Magazine (February 1840), pl. 29.

109: See Zieber, pp. 141-144.

109: See Zieber, pp. 141-144.

110: Illustrated in Lefferts, pls. 4, 7, 21.

110: Shown in Lefferts, pls. 4, 7, 21.

111: In the collections of the Morristown National Historical Park. The Morris Rangers was one of three uniformed Militia units in Morris County, New Jersey, at the outbreak of the War of 1812; it saw service at Paulus Hook in 1814 (Hopkins, pp. 271-272).

111: In the collections of the Morristown National Historical Park. The Morris Rangers was one of three uniformed militia units in Morris County, New Jersey, at the start of the War of 1812; it served at Paulus Hook in 1814 (Hopkins, pp. 271-272).

112: Illustrated in Military Collector and Historian (1951), vol. 3, no. 3, p. 59.

112: Featured in Military Collector and Historian (1951), vol. 3, no. 3, p. 59.

113: See U.S. Military Magazine (April 1839), pl. 5.

113: See U.S. Military Magazine (April 1839), pl. 5.

114: May 1839, pl. 7.

114: May 1839, page 7.

115: U.S. Military Magazine (February 1840), pl. 28; (November 1840), unnumbered plate.

115: U.S. Military Magazine (February 1840), pl. 28; (November 1840), unnumbered plate.

116: U.S. Military Magazine (May 1841), unnumbered plate; (March 1841), unnumbered plate.

116: U.S. Military Magazine (May 1841), unnumbered plate; (March 1841), unnumbered plate.

117: Illustrated in U.S. Military Magazine (January 1840), pl. 26.

117: Shown in U.S. Military Magazine (January 1840), pl. 26.

118: Illustrated in U.S. Military Magazine (August 1839), pl. 15.

118: Shown in U.S. Military Magazine (August 1839), pl. 15.

119: A volunteer Militia company known as the Republican Blues was organized in Savannah in 1808. From notes filed under "Georgia National Guard" in Organizational History and Honors Branch, Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C.

119: A volunteer militia group called the Republican Blues was established in Savannah in 1808. This information comes from notes archived under "Georgia National Guard" in the Organizational History and Honors Branch, Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C.

120: Depicted in U.S. Military Magazine (November 1839), pl. 22.

120: Shown in U.S. Military Magazine (November 1839), pl. 22.

121: Barnes, p. 106 and pl. 2(14).

121: Barnes, p. 106 and pl. 2(14).

122: U.S. Military Magazine (August 1841), unnumbered plate

122: U.S. Military Magazine (August 1841), unnumbered plate

.

123: New York Military Magazine (June 26, 1841), vol. 1, no. 3, p. 45.

123: New York Military Magazine (June 26, 1841), vol. 1, no. 3, p. 45.

124: Johnson, vol. 1, pp. 40, 74.

124: Johnson, vol. 1, pp. 40, 74.

125: Swanson, pp. 253, 382.

125: Swanson, pp. 253, 382.

126: The national collections contain several such Militia colors.

126: The national collections include several of these Militia colors.

127: See Wall.

127: See Wall.

128: Johnson, vol. 1, pp. 61.

128: Johnson, vol. 1, pp. 61.

129: Johnson, vol. 1, pp. 161, 162.

129: Johnson, vol. 1, pp. 161, 162.

130: The spelling of "Grays" may or may not be significant. A Huddy and Duval print of the Washington Greys in U.S. Military Magazine (April 1839, pl. 5) used "Greys" in the title and "Grays" on an ammunition box in the same print.

130: The spelling of "Grays" might or might not be important. A Huddy and Duval print of the Washington Greys in U.S. Military Magazine (April 1839, pl. 5) used "Greys" in the title and "Grays" on an ammo box in the same print.

131: Old Print Shop Folio, p. 216.

131: Old Print Shop Folio, p. 216.

132: April 1839, pl. 5; June 1839, pl. 10.

132: April 1839, pl. 5; June 1839, pl. 10.

133: Zieber, p. 166.

133: Zieber, p. 166.

134: March 1839, pl. 2.

134: March 1839, p. 2.

135: New York Military Magazine (1841), vol. 1, p. 118.

135: New York Military Magazine (1841), vol. 1, p. 118.

136: April 1839, pl. 5; June 1839, pl. 10.

136: April 1839, pl. 5; June 1839, pl. 10.

137: U.S. Military Magazine (January 1840), pl. 27.

137: U.S. Military Magazine (January 1840), p. 27.

138: U.S. Military Magazine (November 1839), pl. 21.

138: U.S. Military Magazine (November 1839), pl. 21.

139: Zieber, pp. 143-144.

139: Zieber, pp. 143-144.

140: Zieber, p. 114.

140: Zieber, p. 114.

141: For the variations in the arms of New York see Zieber, pp. 166-167.

141: For the differences in the New York arms, see Zieber, pp. 166-167.

142: For an interesting discussion of the evolution of the arms of Ohio see Preble, pp. 639-642.

142: For an interesting discussion of the history of Ohio's coat of arms, see Preble, pp. 639-642.

143: Johnson, vol. 1, p. 145, vol. 2, pl. 63.

143: Johnson, vol. 1, p. 145, vol. 2, pl. 63.

144: U.S. Patent 6281 (April 10, 1849).

144: U.S. Patent 6281 (April 10, 1849).

145: In the national collections are a uniform jacket, chapeau, and gorget once owned by Frederick Forsyth, a member of the Portland Rifle Corps in 1857.

145: In the national collections, there’s a standard jacket, hat, and gorget that were once owned by Frederick Forsyth, a member of the Portland Rifle Corps in 1857.

146: Personal communication from Frederick P. Todd, July 6, 1960. Mr. Todd is the foremost authority on New York Militia units.

146: Personal communication from Frederick P. Todd, July 6, 1960. Mr. Todd is the leading expert on New York Militia units.



        
        
    
Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!