This is a modern-English version of The inventions, researches and writings of Nikola Tesla: With special reference to his work in polyphase currents and high potential lighting, originally written by Martin, Thomas Commerford. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.


 

THE INVENTIONS

RESEARCHES AND WRITINGS

OF

NIKOLA TESLA

 

 

TO HIS COUNTRYMEN

IN EASTERN EUROPE THIS RECORD OF
THE WORK ALREADY ACCOMPLISHED BY

NIKOLA TESLA

IS RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED

 

 

THE INVENTIONS

RESEARCHES AND WRITINGS

OF

Nikola Tesla

WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO HIS WORK IN POLYPHASE
CURRENTS AND HIGH POTENTIAL LIGHTING

BY

THOMAS COMMERFORD MARTIN

Editor The Electrical Engineer; Past-President American Institute Electrical Engineers

 

1894
THE ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
NEW YORK
D. VAN NOSTRAND COMPANY,
NEW YORK.

 


 

Entered according to Act of Congress in the year 1893 by
T. C. MARTIN
in the office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington

 

Press of McIlroy & Emmet, 36 Cortlandt St., N. Y.

Press of McIlroy & Emmet, 36 Cortlandt St., New York.


PREFACE.

The electrical problems of the present day lie largely in the economical transmission of power and in the radical improvement of the means and methods of illumination. To many workers and thinkers in the domain of electrical invention, the apparatus and devices that are familiar, appear cumbrous and wasteful, and subject to severe limitations. They believe that the principles of current generation must be changed, the area of current supply be enlarged, and the appliances used by the consumer be at once cheapened and simplified. The brilliant successes of the past justify them in every expectancy of still more generous fruition.

The electrical issues we face today mainly revolve around the cost-effective transmission of power and significantly improving lighting methods and technologies. Many innovators and thinkers in electrical invention view the current devices and equipment as bulky, inefficient, and limited. They argue that we need to change how we generate current, expand the range of power supply, and make the appliances used by consumers cheaper and simpler. The impressive achievements of the past support their hope for even greater advancements in the future.

The present volume is a simple record of the pioneer work done in such departments up to date, by Mr. Nikola Tesla, in whom the world has already recognized one of the foremost of modern electrical investigators and inventors. No attempt whatever has been made here to emphasize the importance of his researches and discoveries. Great ideas and real inventions win their own way, determining their own place by intrinsic merit. But with the conviction that Mr. Tesla is blazing a path that electrical development must follow for many years to come, the compiler has endeavored to bring together all that bears the impress of Mr. Tesla's genius, and is worthy of preservation. Aside from its value as showing the scope of his inventions, this volume may be of service as indicating the range of his thought. There is intellectual profit in studying the push and play of a vigorous and original mind.

This volume is a straightforward record of the pioneering work done so far by Mr. Nikola Tesla, who has already been recognized as one of the leading modern electrical researchers and inventors. No effort has been made here to stress the significance of his research and discoveries. Great ideas and genuine inventions make their own way and find their own place based on inherent value. However, believing that Mr. Tesla is paving a path that electrical development will have to follow for many years, the compiler has aimed to gather everything that reflects Mr. Tesla's genius and deserves to be preserved. Beyond its value in showcasing the breadth of his inventions, this volume may also serve to illustrate the range of his thinking. There is intellectual benefit in studying the dynamics of a strong and original mind.

Although the lively interest of the public in Mr. Tesla's work is perhaps of recent growth, this volume covers the results of full ten years. It includes his lectures, miscellaneous articles[Pg vi] and discussions, and makes note of all his inventions thus far known, particularly those bearing on polyphase motors and the effects obtained with currents of high potential and high frequency. It will be seen that Mr. Tesla has ever pressed forward, barely pausing for an instant to work out in detail the utilizations that have at once been obvious to him of the new principles he has elucidated. Wherever possible his own language has been employed.

Although the public's interest in Mr. Tesla's work has only recently grown, this book covers the results of a full ten years. It includes his lectures, various articles[Pg vi] and discussions, and documents all his inventions known so far, especially those related to polyphase motors and the results achieved with high-voltage and high-frequency currents. It will be clear that Mr. Tesla has always pushed ahead, hardly taking a moment to fully explore the practical applications of the new principles he has explained. Where possible, his own words have been used.

It may be added that this volume is issued with Mr. Tesla's sanction and approval, and that permission has been obtained for the re-publication in it of such papers as have been read before various technical societies of this country and Europe. Mr. Tesla has kindly favored the author by looking over the proof sheets of the sections embodying his latest researches. The work has also enjoyed the careful revision of the author's friend and editorial associate, Mr. Joseph Wetzler, through whose hands all the proofs have passed.

It’s worth noting that this book is published with Mr. Tesla's approval, and permission has been granted to reprint papers that have been presented to various technical societies in this country and Europe. Mr. Tesla has generously reviewed the proofs of the sections that include his latest research. The work has also been thoroughly revised by the author's friend and editorial partner, Mr. Joseph Wetzler, who has reviewed all the proofs.

December, 1893.

December 1893.

T. C. M.

T.C.M.


CONTENTS.

PART I.
POLYPHASE CURRENTS.
CHAPTER I.
Bio and Intro.3
CHAPTER II.
A New System of AC Motors and Transformers.7
CHAPTER III.
The Tesla Rotating Magnetic Field.—Closed Conductor Motors.—Synchronous Motors.—Rotating Field Transformers.9
CHAPTER IV.
Modifications and Expansions of the Tesla Polyphase Systems.26
CHAPTER V.
Using Common Types of Continuous Current Generators.31
CHAPTER VI.
How to Achieve the Desired Speed of a Motor or Generator.36
CHAPTER VII.
[Pg viii]Motor Controller for Rotary Motors.45
CHAPTER VIII.
Single Circuit, Self-Starting Sync Motors.50
CHAPTER IX.
Switch from Double Current to Single Current Motors.56
CHAPTER X.
Motor with "Current Lag" Securely Fixed.58
CHAPTER XI.
Another Way to Convert from a Torque Motor to a Synchronizing Motor.62
CHAPTER XII.
"Magnetic Lag" Motor.67
CHAPTER XIII.
Method for Obtaining Phase Difference Using Magnetic Shielding.71
CHAPTER XIV.
Tesla Single-Phase Motor Type.76
CHAPTER XV.
Motors with Circuits of Varying Resistance.79
CHAPTER XVI.
Motor with Equal Magnetic Energies in the Field and Armature.81
CHAPTER XVII.
Motors with Matching Peak Magnetic Effects in the Armature and Field.83
CHAPTER XVIII.
[Pg ix]Motor Utilizing the Phase Difference in the Magnetization of the Inner and Outer Sections of an Iron Core.88
CHAPTER XIX.
Another Type of Tesla Induction Motor.92
CHAPTER XX.
Combinations of Synchronizing Motors and Torque Motors.95
CHAPTER XXI.
Motor with a Capacitor in the Armature Circuit.101
CHAPTER XXII.
Motor with Condenser in One of the Field Circuits.106
CHAPTER XXIII.
Tesla Polyphase Transformer.109
CHAPTER XXIV.
A Constant Current Transformer with a Magnetic Shield Between the Primary and Secondary Coils.113
PART II.
THE TESLA EFFECTS WITH HIGH FREQUENCY AND HIGH POTENTIAL CURRENTS.
CHAPTER XXV.
Introduction—The Purpose of The Tesla Lectures.119
CHAPTER XXVI.
The New York Lecture. Experiments with Alternative Currents of Very High Frequency and Their Use in Artificial Lighting Methods, May 20, 1891.145
CHAPTER XXVII.
[Pg x]The London Lecture. Experiments with Alternate Currents of High Voltage and High Frequency, February 3, 1892.198
CHAPTER XXVIII.
The Philadelphia and St. Louis Lecture on Light and Other High-Frequency Phenomena, February and March 1893.294
CHAPTER XXIX.
Tesla Alternating Current Generators for High Frequency.374
CHAPTER XXX.
AC Electrostatic Induction Device.392
CHAPTER XXXI.
"Massage" with High-Frequency Currents.394
CHAPTER XXXII.
Electric Discharge in Vacuum Tubes.396
PART III.
MISCELLANEOUS INVENTIONS AND WRITINGS.
CHAPTER XXXIII.
Method of Obtaining Direct Current from Alternating Currents.409
CHAPTER XXXIV.
Oil Plate Condensers.418
CHAPTER XXXV.
Smart Energy Meter.420
CHAPTER XXXVI.
[Pg xi]Thermo-Magnetic Motors and Pyro-Magnetic Generators.424
CHAPTER XXXVII.
Anti-sparking Dynamo Brush & Commutator.432
CHAPTER XXXVIII.
Auxiliary Brush Control for Direct Current Dynamos.438
CHAPTER XXXIX.
Enhancement in Dynamo and Motor Design.448
CHAPTER XL.
Tesla Direct Current Arc Lighting System.451
CHAPTER XLI.
Upgrade in Unipolar Generators.465
PART IV.
APPENDIX: EARLY PHASE MOTORS AND THE TESLA OSCILLATORS.
CHAPTER XLII.
Mr. Tesla's Personal Exhibit at the World’s Fair.477
CHAPTER XLIII.
The Tesla Mechanical and Electrical Oscillators.486

PART I.

POLYPHASE CURRENTS.


CHAPTER I.

Bio and Intro.

As an introduction to the record contained in this volume of Mr. Tesla's investigations and discoveries, a few words of a biographical nature will, it is deemed, not be out of place, nor other than welcome.

As an introduction to the record in this volume of Mr. Tesla's research and discoveries, a few biographical details are considered appropriate and will likely be welcomed.

Nikola Tesla was born in 1857 at Smiljan, Lika, a borderland region of Austro-Hungary, of the Serbian race, which has maintained against Turkey and all comers so unceasing a struggle for freedom. His family is an old and representative one among these Switzers of Eastern Europe, and his father was an eloquent clergyman in the Greek Church. An uncle is to-day Metropolitan in Bosnia. His mother was a woman of inherited ingenuity, and delighted not only in skilful work of the ordinary household character, but in the construction of such mechanical appliances as looms and churns and other machinery required in a rural community. Nikola was educated at Gospich in the public school for four years, and then spent three years in the Real Schule. He was then sent to Carstatt, Croatia, where he continued his studies for three years in the Higher Real Schule. There for the first time he saw a steam locomotive. He graduated in 1873, and, surviving an attack of cholera, devoted himself to experimentation, especially in electricity and magnetism. His father would have had him maintain the family tradition by entering the Church, but native genius was too strong, and he was allowed to enter the Polytechnic School at Gratz, to finish his studies, and with the object of becoming a professor of mathematics and physics. One of the machines there experimented with was a Gramme dynamo, used as a motor. Despite his instructor's perfect demonstration of the fact that it was impossible to operate a dynamo without commutator or brushes, Mr. Tesla could not be convinced that such accessories were necessary or desirable. He had already seen with quick intuition that a way could be found to dispense with them; and from that time he may[Pg 4] be said to have begun work on the ideas that fructified ultimately in his rotating field motors.

Nikola Tesla was born in 1857 in Smiljan, Lika, a border region of Austro-Hungary, of Serbian descent, known for its relentless struggle for freedom against Turkey and others. His family has a long and respected history among the Eastern European Swiss, and his father was an eloquent clergyman in the Greek Church. An uncle is currently a Metropolitan in Bosnia. His mother was a woman of natural talent, skilled not just in typical household tasks but also in building mechanical devices like looms and churns, essential for rural life. Nikola attended public school in Gospich for four years, then spent three years at the Real Schule. He was later sent to Carstatt, Croatia, to continue his studies for three years at the Higher Real Schule. It was there that he first saw a steam locomotive. He graduated in 1873, and after surviving a cholera outbreak, he focused on experimentation, particularly in electricity and magnetism. His father wanted him to follow the family tradition and enter the Church, but his natural talent was too strong, and he was allowed to enroll at the Polytechnic School in Gratz to complete his studies, aiming to become a professor of mathematics and physics. One of the machines he experimented with was a Gramme dynamo used as a motor. Even though his instructor perfectly demonstrated that it was impossible to operate a dynamo without a commutator or brushes, Tesla was unconvinced that these parts were necessary. He instinctively realized that it was possible to find a way around that, and from that point on, he can be said to have started working on ideas that eventually led to his rotating field motors.

In the second year of his Gratz course, Mr. Tesla gave up the notion of becoming a teacher, and took up the engineering curriculum. His studies ended, he returned home in time to see his father die, and then went to Prague and Buda-Pesth to study languages, with the object of qualifying himself broadly for the practice of the engineering profession. For a short time he served as an assistant in the Government Telegraph Engineering Department, and then became associated with M. Puskas, a personal and family friend, and other exploiters of the telephone in Hungary. He made a number of telephonic inventions, but found his opportunities of benefiting by them limited in various ways. To gain a wider field of action, he pushed on to Paris and there secured employment as an electrical engineer with one of the large companies in the new industry of electric lighting.

In his second year at Gratz, Mr. Tesla decided to give up on becoming a teacher and switched to the engineering program. After finishing his studies, he returned home just in time to witness his father's death. He then traveled to Prague and Budapest to learn languages, aiming to better prepare himself for a career in engineering. For a brief period, he worked as an assistant in the Government Telegraph Engineering Department, and later teamed up with M. Puskas, a personal and family friend, along with other pioneers of the telephone in Hungary. He created several telephonic inventions but found that his chances to profit from them were limited in various ways. In search of more opportunities, he moved to Paris and landed a job as an electrical engineer with one of the major companies in the emerging electric lighting industry.

It was during this period, and as early as 1882, that he began serious and continued efforts to embody the rotating field principle in operative apparatus. He was enthusiastic about it; believed it to mark a new departure in the electrical arts, and could think of nothing else. In fact, but for the solicitations of a few friends in commercial circles who urged him to form a company to exploit the invention, Mr. Tesla, then a youth of little worldly experience, would have sought an immediate opportunity to publish his ideas, believing them to be worthy of note as a novel and radical advance in electrical theory as well as destined to have a profound influence on all dynamo electric machinery.

It was during this time, starting in 1882, that he began serious and ongoing efforts to implement the rotating field principle in operational devices. He was excited about it and believed it marked a significant shift in electrical engineering, to the point where he could think of nothing else. In fact, if it hadn’t been for the encouragement from a few friends in business who suggested he start a company to leverage the invention, Mr. Tesla, then a young man with little life experience, would have looked for an immediate chance to share his ideas. He believed they were noteworthy as a new and groundbreaking development in electrical theory and were bound to make a significant impact on all dynamo electric machinery.

At last he determined that it would be best to try his fortunes in America. In France he had met many Americans, and in contact with them learned the desirability of turning every new idea in electricity to practical use. He learned also of the ready encouragement given in the United States to any inventor who could attain some new and valuable result. The resolution was formed with characteristic quickness, and abandoning all his prospects in Europe, he at once set his face westward.

At last, he decided that it would be best to try his luck in America. In France, he had met many Americans, and through them, he learned how important it was to put every new idea in electricity to practical use. He also discovered how readily inventors in the United States were encouraged if they could achieve something new and valuable. With his usual quickness, he made his decision and left behind all his prospects in Europe to head west.

Arrived in the United States, Mr. Tesla took off his coat the day he arrived, in the Edison Works. That place had been a goal of his ambition, and one can readily imagine the benefit and stimulus derived from association with Mr. Edison, for whom Mr. Tesla has always had the strongest admiration. It was impossible, however, that, with his own ideas to carry out, and his[Pg 5] own inventions to develop, Mr. Tesla could long remain in even the most delightful employ; and, his work now attracting attention, he left the Edison ranks to join a company intended to make and sell an arc lighting system based on some of his inventions in that branch of the art. With unceasing diligence he brought the system to perfection, and saw it placed on the market. But the thing which most occupied his time and thoughts, however, all through this period, was his old discovery of the rotating field principle for alternating current work, and the application of it in motors that have now become known the world over.

Arriving in the United States, Mr. Tesla took off his coat the day he started at the Edison Works. That place had been a goal of his ambition, and you can easily imagine the benefit and inspiration he gained from working with Mr. Edison, for whom Mr. Tesla has always had the utmost respect. However, it was impossible for Mr. Tesla to stay in even the most enjoyable position for long, especially with his own ideas to implement and inventions to develop. As his work began to gain attention, he left the Edison ranks to join a company focused on creating and selling an arc lighting system based on some of his inventions in that field. With relentless effort, he perfected the system and got it on the market. But what occupied most of his time and thoughts during this period was his earlier discovery of the rotating field principle for alternating current work and its application in motors that have now become famous around the world.

Strong as his convictions on the subject then were, it is a fact that he stood very much alone, for the alternating current had no well recognized place. Few electrical engineers had ever used it, and the majority were entirely unfamiliar with its value, or even its essential features. Even Mr. Tesla himself did not, until after protracted effort and experimentation, learn how to construct alternating current apparatus of fair efficiency. But that he had accomplished his purpose was shown by the tests of Prof. Anthony, made in the of winter 1887-8, when Tesla motors in the hands of that distinguished expert gave an efficiency equal to that of direct current motors. Nothing now stood in the way of the commercial development and introduction of such motors, except that they had to be constructed with a view to operating on the circuits then existing, which in this country were all of high frequency.

As strong as his beliefs about the topic were, he was quite alone because alternating current didn’t have an established reputation. Few electrical engineers had ever used it, and most were completely unaware of its value or even its basic features. Even Mr. Tesla himself didn’t figure out how to create efficient alternating current devices until after much effort and experimentation. However, he proved he had achieved his goal when tests by Prof. Anthony during the winter of 1887-88 showed that Tesla motors performed as efficiently as direct current motors. At this point, nothing was holding back the commercial development and introduction of these motors, except that they had to be designed to work with the existing circuits, which in this country were all high frequency.

The first full publication of his work in this direction—outside his patents—was a paper read before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers in New York, in May, 1888 (read at the suggestion of Prof. Anthony and the present writer), when he exhibited motors that had been in operation long previous, and with which his belief that brushes and commutators could be dispensed with, was triumphantly proved to be correct. The section of this volume devoted to Mr. Tesla's inventions in the utilization of polyphase currents will show how thoroughly from the outset he had mastered the fundamental idea and applied it in the greatest variety of ways.

The first complete publication of his work in this area—beyond his patents—was a paper presented at the American Institute of Electrical Engineers in New York in May 1888 (read at the suggestion of Prof. Anthony and the current author). In this paper, he showcased motors that had been running long before, proving his belief that brushes and commutators could be eliminated. The section of this volume focused on Mr. Tesla's inventions for using polyphase currents will demonstrate how thoroughly he understood the fundamental concept from the beginning and applied it in a wide range of ways.

Having noted for years the many advantages obtainable with alternating currents, Mr. Tesla was naturally led on to experiment with them at higher potentials and higher frequencies than were common or approved of. Ever pressing forward to determine in even the slightest degree the outlines of the unknown, he[Pg 6] was rewarded very quickly in this field with results of the most surprising nature. A slight acquaintance with some of these experiments led the compiler of this volume to urge Mr. Tesla to repeat them before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. This was done in May, 1891, in a lecture that marked, beyond question, a distinct departure in electrical theory and practice, and all the results of which have not yet made themselves fully apparent. The New York lecture, and its successors, two in number, are also included in this volume, with a few supplementary notes.

Having observed for years the many benefits of alternating currents, Mr. Tesla was naturally inspired to experiment with them at higher voltages and frequencies than what was common or accepted. Always pushing forward to uncover even the smallest details of the unknown, he[Pg 6] quickly achieved some surprisingly significant results in this area. A basic understanding of some of these experiments motivated the compiler of this volume to encourage Mr. Tesla to present them before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. This took place in May 1891, during a lecture that undeniably marked a significant shift in electrical theory and practice, with results that are still unfolding. The New York lecture, along with two subsequent ones, is also included in this volume, along with a few supplementary notes.

Mr. Tesla's work ranges far beyond the vast departments of polyphase currents and high potential lighting. The "Miscellaneous" section of this volume includes a great many other inventions in arc lighting, transformers, pyro-magnetic generators, thermo-magnetic motors, third-brush regulation, improvements in dynamos, new forms of incandescent lamps, electrical meters, condensers, unipolar dynamos, the conversion of alternating into direct currents, etc. It is needless to say that at this moment Mr. Tesla is engaged on a number of interesting ideas and inventions, to be made public in due course. The present volume deals simply with his work accomplished to date.

Mr. Tesla's work goes far beyond the extensive areas of polyphase currents and high-voltage lighting. The "Miscellaneous" section of this volume includes many other inventions in arc lighting, transformers, pyro-magnetic generators, thermo-magnetic motors, third-brush regulation, improvements in dynamos, new types of incandescent lamps, electrical meters, capacitors, unipolar dynamos, the conversion of alternating to direct currents, and more. It’s unnecessary to mention that right now Mr. Tesla is working on several exciting ideas and inventions, which will be announced in due time. This volume simply covers his work completed so far.


CHAPTER II.

A New System of Alternating Current Motors and Transformers.

The present section of this volume deals with polyphase currents, and the inventions by Mr. Tesla, made known thus far, in which he has embodied one feature or another of the broad principle of rotating field poles or resultant attraction exerted on the armature. It is needless to remind electricians of the great interest aroused by the first enunciation of the rotating field principle, or to dwell upon the importance of the advance from a single alternating current, to methods and apparatus which deal with more than one. Simply prefacing the consideration here attempted of the subject, with the remark that in nowise is the object of this volume of a polemic or controversial nature, it may be pointed out that Mr. Tesla's work has not at all been fully understood or realized up to date. To many readers, it is believed, the analysis of what he has done in this department will be a revelation, while it will at the same time illustrate the beautiful flexibility and range of the principles involved. It will be seen that, as just suggested, Mr. Tesla did not stop short at a mere rotating field, but dealt broadly with the shifting of the resultant attraction of the magnets. It will be seen that he went on to evolve the "multiphase" system with many ramifications and turns; that he showed the broad idea of motors employing currents of differing phase in the armature with direct currents in the field; that he first described and worked out the idea of an armature with a body of iron and coils closed upon themselves; that he worked out both synchronizing and torque motors; that he explained and illustrated how machines of ordinary construction might be adapted to his system; that he employed condensers in field and armature circuits, and went to the bottom of the fundamental principles, testing, approving or rejecting, it would appear, every detail that inventive ingenuity could hit upon.[Pg 8]

The current section of this volume focuses on polyphase currents and the inventions by Mr. Tesla that have been shared so far, which incorporate aspects of the broad principle of rotating field poles or resultant attraction acting on the armature. It's unnecessary to remind electricians of the significant interest sparked by the initial introduction of the rotating field principle or to emphasize the importance of moving from a single alternating current to methods and devices that handle multiple currents. Before diving into the discussion at hand, it's important to note that this volume is not intended to be argumentative or controversial. It should be pointed out that Mr. Tesla's work has not been completely understood or appreciated up to now. Many readers might find the analysis of his contributions in this area to be enlightening, while also showcasing the remarkable flexibility and range of the underlying principles. As will be demonstrated, Mr. Tesla didn't limit himself to just a rotating field; he explored the shifting of the resultant attraction of the magnets extensively. He developed the "multiphase" system with various complexities; he presented the overarching concept of motors that use currents of different phases in the armature and direct currents in the field; he was the first to describe and devise an armature with a body of iron and coils that are closed upon themselves; he developed both synchronizing and torque motors; he explained and illustrated how ordinary machines could be adapted to his system; he utilized capacitors in the field and armature circuits, and thoroughly investigated the fundamental principles, testing, approving, or rejecting seemingly every detail that inventive creativity could conceive.[Pg 8]

Now that opinion is turning so emphatically in favor of lower frequencies, it deserves special note that Mr. Tesla early recognized the importance of the low frequency feature in motor work. In fact his first motors exhibited publicly—and which, as Prof. Anthony showed in his tests in the winter of 1887-8, were the equal of direct current motors in efficiency, output and starting torque—were of the low frequency type. The necessity arising, however, to utilize these motors in connection with the existing high frequency circuits, our survey reveals in an interesting manner Mr. Tesla's fertility of resource in this direction. But that, after exhausting all the possibilities of this field, Mr. Tesla returns to low frequencies, and insists on the superiority of his polyphase system in alternating current distribution, need not at all surprise us, in view of the strength of his convictions, so often expressed, on this subject. This is, indeed, significant, and may be regarded as indicative of the probable development next to be witnessed.

Now that opinions are shifting strongly in favor of lower frequencies, it's important to note that Mr. Tesla recognized the significance of low frequency features in motor work early on. In fact, his first motors, which were publicly demonstrated—and which, as Prof. Anthony showed in his tests during the winter of 1887-8, matched the efficiency, output, and starting torque of direct current motors—were of the low frequency type. However, the need to use these motors with existing high frequency circuits highlights Mr. Tesla's ingenuity in this area. After exploring all possibilities in this field, it’s no surprise that Mr. Tesla returns to low frequencies and emphasizes the advantages of his polyphase system for alternating current distribution, given his strong convictions on this topic that he has frequently expressed. This is indeed significant and may indicate the likely development we will see next.

Incidental reference has been made to the efficiency of rotating field motors, a matter of much importance, though it is not the intention to dwell upon it here. Prof. Anthony in his remarks before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, in May, 1888, on the two small Tesla motors then shown, which he had tested, stated that one gave an efficiency of about 50 per cent. and the other a little over sixty per cent. In 1889, some tests were reported from Pittsburgh, made by Mr. Tesla and Mr. Albert Schmid, on motors up to 10 h. p. and weighing about 850 pounds. These machines showed an efficiency of nearly 90 per cent. With some larger motors it was then found practicable to obtain an efficiency, with the three wire system, up to as high as 94 and 95 per cent. These interesting figures, which, of course, might be supplemented by others more elaborate and of later date, are cited to show that the efficiency of the system has not had to wait until the present late day for any demonstration of its commercial usefulness. An invention is none the less beautiful because it may lack utility, but it must be a pleasure to any inventor to know that the ideas he is advancing are fraught with substantial benefits to the public.

Casual mention has been made about the efficiency of rotating field motors, which is quite significant, although there’s no intention to focus on it here. Professor Anthony, in his remarks before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers in May 1888 about the two small Tesla motors he tested, noted that one had an efficiency of about 50 percent and the other just over 60 percent. In 1889, Mr. Tesla and Mr. Albert Schmid reported tests from Pittsburgh on motors up to 10 h. p. that weighed about 850 pounds. These machines demonstrated an efficiency of nearly 90 percent. With some larger motors, it was found possible to achieve an efficiency of up to 94 and 95 percent using the three-wire system. These intriguing figures, which could certainly be supported by more detailed and recent data, are mentioned to illustrate that the efficiency of the system has had demonstrations of its commercial value long before now. An invention is still remarkable even if it lacks practical use, but it must be gratifying for any inventor to know that the ideas they are putting forward have real benefits for the public.


CHAPTER III.

The Tesla Rotating Magnetic Field.Motors with closed conductors.Motor Syncing.Rotating Field Transformers.

The best description that can be given of what he attempted, and succeeded in doing, with the rotating magnetic field, is to be found in Mr. Tesla's brief paper explanatory of his rotary current, polyphase system, read before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, in New York, in May, 1888, under the title "A New System of Alternate Current Motors and Transformers." As a matter of fact, which a perusal of the paper will establish, Mr. Tesla made no attempt in that paper to describe all his work. It dealt in reality with the few topics enumerated in the caption of this chapter. Mr. Tesla's reticence was no doubt due largely to the fact that his action was governed by the wishes of others with whom he was associated, but it may be worth mention that the compiler of this volume—who had seen the motors running, and who was then chairman of the Institute Committee on Papers and Meetings—had great difficulty in inducing Mr. Tesla to give the Institute any paper at all. Mr. Tesla was overworked and ill, and manifested the greatest reluctance to an exhibition of his motors, but his objections were at last overcome. The paper was written the night previous to the meeting, in pencil, very hastily, and under the pressure just mentioned.

The best way to describe what he tried to accomplish, and actually did, with the rotating magnetic field is found in Mr. Tesla's short paper that explains his rotary current polyphase system. He presented it to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers in New York in May 1888, titled "A New System of Alternate Current Motors and Transformers." In fact, a read-through of the paper will show that Mr. Tesla did not attempt to cover all of his work. It really focused on the few topics listed in the chapter title. Mr. Tesla's reluctance was largely due to the influence of others he was working with, but it's worth noting that the person compiling this book—who had seen the motors in action and was then the chairman of the Institute Committee on Papers and Meetings—had a tough time getting Mr. Tesla to submit any paper at all. Mr. Tesla was overworked and unwell, and he was very reluctant to showcase his motors, but his objections were eventually overcome. The paper was written the night before the meeting, in pencil, very quickly, and under the aforementioned pressure.

In this paper casual reference was made to two special forms of motors not within the group to be considered. These two forms were: 1. A motor with one of its circuits in series with a transformer, and the other in the secondary of the transformer. 2. A motor having its armature circuit connected to the generator, and the field coils closed upon themselves. The paper in its essence is as follows, dealing with a few leading features of the Tesla system, namely, the rotating magnetic field, motors[Pg 10] with closed conductors, synchronizing motors, and rotating field transformers:—

In this paper, there was a casual mention of two special types of motors that aren't part of the main discussion. These two types were: 1. A motor with one of its circuits connected in series with a transformer, and the other connected to the transformer’s secondary. 2. A motor with its armature circuit linked to the generator, while the field coils are looped back on themselves. The main focus of the paper is on a few key aspects of the Tesla system, which include the rotating magnetic field, motors with closed conductors, synchronizing motors, and rotating field transformers:—

The subject which I now have the pleasure of bringing to your notice is a novel system of electric distribution and transmission of power by means of alternate currents, affording peculiar advantages, particularly in the way of motors, which I am confident will at once establish the superior adaptability of these currents to the transmission of power and will show that many results heretofore unattainable can be reached by their use; results which are very much desired in the practical operation of such systems, and which cannot be accomplished by means of continuous currents.

The topic I’m excited to share with you is a new system for distributing and transmitting power using alternating currents. This system offers unique benefits, especially for motors, and I’m sure it will quickly demonstrate how well these currents are suited for power transmission. It will show that many outcomes that were previously impossible can now be achieved with this technology—outcomes that are highly sought after in the practical use of such systems, and which cannot be accomplished with continuous currents.

Before going into a detailed description of this system, I think it necessary to make a few remarks with reference to certain conditions existing in continuous current generators and motors, which, although generally known, are frequently disregarded.

Before diving into a detailed description of this system, I think it's important to make some remarks about certain conditions present in continuous current generators and motors, which, although generally understood, are often overlooked.

In our dynamo machines, it is well known, we generate alternate currents which we direct by means of a commutator, a complicated device and, it may be justly said, the source of most of the troubles experienced in the operation of the machines. Now, the currents so directed cannot be utilized in the motor, but they must—again by means of a similar unreliable device—be reconverted into their original state of alternate currents. The function of the commutator is entirely external, and in no way does it affect the internal working of the machines. In reality, therefore, all machines are alternate current machines, the currents appearing as continuous only in the external circuit during their transit from generator to motor. In view simply of this fact, alternate currents would commend themselves as a more direct application of electrical energy, and the employment of continuous currents would only be justified if we had dynamos which would primarily generate, and motors which would be directly actuated by, such currents.

In our dynamo machines, it's well known that we generate alternating currents which we direct using a commutator—a complex device that is often the source of most issues encountered while operating the machines. These directed currents cannot be used in the motor; instead, they must—again through a similarly unreliable device—be converted back into their original form of alternating currents. The commutator's function is completely external and doesn't impact the internal mechanics of the machines. Consequently, all machines are fundamentally alternating current machines, with the currents appearing continuous only in the external circuit as they move from generator to motor. Given this fact, alternating currents would seem like a more straightforward way to apply electrical energy, and using direct currents would only make sense if we had dynamos designed to primarily generate and motors that would be directly powered by those currents.

But the operation of the commutator on a motor is twofold; first, it reverses the currents through the motor, and secondly, it effects automatically, a progressive shifting of the poles of one of its magnetic constituents. Assuming, therefore, that both of the useless operations in the systems, that is to say, the directing of the alternate currents on the generator and reversing the direct currents on the motor, be eliminated, it would still be necessary, in order to cause a rotation of the motor, to produce a progressive[Pg 11] shifting of the poles of one of its elements, and the question presented itself—How to perform this operation by the direct action of alternate currents? I will now proceed to show how this result was accomplished.

But the commutator's function in a motor serves two main purposes: first, it reverses the current flowing through the motor, and second, it automatically shifts the positions of the poles in one of its magnetic parts. So, if we eliminate both unnecessary processes in the systems—namely, directing the alternating current in the generator and reversing the direct current in the motor—it would still be essential, to make the motor rotate, to create a progressive[Pg 11] shifting of the poles in one of its components. This raises the question—How can we achieve this operation using the direct action of alternating currents? I will now explain how this was done.

Fig. 1. Fig. 1.
Fig. 1a. Fig. 1a.

In the first experiment a drum-armature was provided with two coils at right angles to each other, and the ends of these coils were connected to two pairs of insulated contact-rings as usual. A ring was then made of thin insulated plates of sheet-iron and wound with four coils, each two opposite coils being connected together so as to produce free poles on diametrically opposite sides of the ring. The remaining free ends of the coils were then connected to the contact-rings of the generator armature so as to form two independent circuits, as indicated in Fig. 9. It may now be seen what results were secured in this combination, and with this view I would refer to the diagrams, Figs. 1 to 8a. The field of the generator being independently excited, the rotation of the armature sets up currents in the coils C C1, varying in strength and direction in the well-known manner. In the position shown in Fig. 1, the current in coil C is nil, while coil C1 is traversed by its maximum current, and the connections may be such that the ring is magnetized by the coils c1 c1, as indicated by the letters N S in Fig. 1a, the magnetizing effect of the coils [Pg 12]c c being nil, since these coils are included in the circuit of coil C.

In the first experiment, a drum armature was equipped with two coils positioned perpendicular to each other, and the ends of these coils were connected to two pairs of insulated contact rings as usual. A ring made of thin insulated plates of sheet iron was then wrapped with four coils, with each pair of opposing coils connected to create free poles on opposite sides of the ring. The remaining open ends of the coils were then connected to the contact rings of the generator armature, forming two independent circuits, as shown in Fig. 9. It is now possible to observe the results achieved with this combination, and to that end, I would like to reference the diagrams, Figs. 1 to 8a. With the generator's field being independently energized, the rotation of the armature generates currents in the coils C C1, varying in strength and direction in the familiar manner. In the position shown in Fig. 1, the current in coil C is zero, while coil C1 carries its maximum current, with the connections arranged such that the ring is magnetized by the coils c1 c1, as marked by the letters N S in Fig. 1a, and the magnetizing effect of the coils [Pg 12]c c is nonexistent, since these coils are part of the circuit of coil C.

Fig. 2. Fig. 2.
Fig. 2a. Fig. 2a.

In Fig. 2, the armature coils are shown in a more advanced position, one-eighth of one revolution being completed. Fig. 2a illustrates the corresponding magnetic condition of the ring. At this moment the coil C1 generates a current of the same direction as previously, but weaker, producing the poles n1 s1 upon the ring; the coil C also generates a current of the same direction, and the connections may be such that the coils c c produce the poles n s, as shown in Fig. 2a. The resulting polarity is indicated by the letters N S, and it will be observed that the poles of the ring have been shifted one-eighth of the periphery of the same.

In Fig. 2, the armature coils are shown in a more advanced position, having completed one-eighth of a revolution. Fig. 2a illustrates the corresponding magnetic condition of the ring. At this point, the coil C1 generates a current in the same direction as before, but it's weaker, creating the poles n1 s1 on the ring; the coil C also generates a current in the same direction, and the connections might be arranged so that the coils c c produce the poles n s, as shown in Fig. 2a. The resulting polarity is indicated by the letters N S, and it's noticeable that the poles of the ring have been shifted one-eighth of its periphery.

Fig. 3. Fig. 3.
Fig. 3a. Fig. 3a.

In Fig. 3 the armature has completed one quarter of one revolution. In this phase the current in coil C is a maximum, and of such direction as to produce the poles N S in Fig. 3a, whereas the current in coil C1 is nil, this coil being at its neutral position. The poles N S in Fig. 3a are thus shifted one quarter of the circumference of the ring.

In Fig. 3, the armature has completed one quarter of a revolution. At this point, the current in coil C is at its maximum, flowing in a direction that creates the poles N S shown in Fig. 3a, while the current in coil C1 is zero, as this coil is in its neutral position. Therefore, the poles N S in Fig. 3a have shifted one quarter of the way around the ring.

Fig. 4. Fig. 4.
Fig. 4a. Fig. 4a.

Fig. 4 shows the coils C C in a still more advanced position, the armature having completed three-eighths of one revolution. At that moment the coil C still generates a current of the same direction as before, but of less strength, producing the compar[Pg 13]atively weaker poles n s in Fig. 4a. The current in the coil C1 is of the same strength, but opposite direction. Its effect is, therefore, to produce upon the ring the poles n1 s1, as indicated, and a polarity, N S, results, the poles now being shifted three-eighths of the periphery of the ring.

Fig. 4 shows the coils C C in an even further advanced position, with the armature having completed three-eighths of one revolution. At that moment, the coil C still generates a current in the same direction as before, but with less strength, creating the comparatively weaker poles n s in Fig. 4a. The current in the coil C1 is the same strength but in the opposite direction. As a result, it produces the poles n1 s1, as shown, leading to a polarity of N S, with the poles now shifted three-eighths of the ring's periphery.

Fig. 5. Fig. 5.
Fig. 5a. Fig. 5a.

In Fig. 5 one half of one revolution of the armature is completed, and the resulting magnetic condition of the ring is indicated in Fig. 5a. Now the current in coil C is nil, while the coil C1 yields its maximum current, which is of the same direction as previously; the magnetizing effect is, therefore, due to the coils, c1 c1 alone, and, referring to Fig. 5a, it will be observed that the poles N S are shifted one half of the circumference of the ring. During the next half revolution the operations are repeated, as represented in the Figs. 6 to 8a.

In Fig. 5, one half of a revolution of the armature has been completed, and the resulting magnetic condition of the ring is shown in Fig. 5a. At this point, the current in coil C is zero, while coil C1 produces its maximum current, which flows in the same direction as before. Therefore, the magnetizing effect is solely due to coils c1 c1, and if we look at Fig. 5a, we can see that the poles N S have moved halfway around the ring's circumference. In the next half revolution, the process is repeated, as shown in Figs. 6 to 8a.

Fig. 6. Fig. 6.
Fig. 6a. Fig. 6a.

A reference to the diagrams will make it clear that during one revolution of the armature the poles of the ring are shifted once around its periphery, and, each revolution producing like effects, a rapid whirling of the poles in harmony with the rotation of the armature is the result. If the connections of either one of the circuits in the ring are reversed, the shifting of the poles is made to progress in the opposite direction, but the operation is identi[Pg 14]cally the same. Instead of using four wires, with like result, three wires may be used, one forming a common return for both circuits.

A look at the diagrams will clarify that during one full turn of the armature, the poles of the ring move around its edge once, and since each turn has the same effects, this leads to the poles rapidly spinning in sync with the armature's rotation. If the connections of either circuit in the ring are reversed, the movement of the poles shifts in the opposite direction, but the operation remains exactly the same. Instead of using four wires to achieve the same outcome, you can use three wires, with one serving as a common return for both circuits.

Fig. 7. Fig. 7.
Fig. 7a. Fig. 7a.

This rotation or whirling of the poles manifests itself in a series of curious phenomena. If a delicately pivoted disc of steel or other magnetic metal is approached to the ring it is set in rapid rotation, the direction of rotation varying with the position of the disc. For instance, noting the direction outside of the ring it will be found that inside the ring it turns in an opposite direction, while it is unaffected if placed in a position symmetrical to the ring. This is easily explained. Each time that a pole approaches, it induces an opposite pole in the nearest point on the disc, and an attraction is produced upon that point; owing to this, as the pole is shifted further away from the disc a tangential pull is exerted upon the same, and the action being constantly repeated, a more or less rapid rotation of the disc is the result. As the pull is exerted mainly upon that part which is nearest to the ring, the rotation outside and inside, or right and left, respectively, is in opposite directions, Fig. 9. When placed symmetrically to the ring, the pull on the opposite sides of the disc being equal, no rotation results. The action is based on the magnetic inertia of iron; for this reason a disc of hard steel is much more affected than a disc of soft iron, the latter being capable of very rapid variations of magnetism. Such a disc has proved to be a very useful instrument in all these investigations, as it has enabled me to detect any irregularity in the action. A curious effect is also produced upon iron filings. By placing some upon a paper and holding them externally quite close to the ring, they are set in a vibrating motion, remaining in the same place, although the paper may be moved back and forth; but in lifting the paper to a certain height which seems to be dependent on the intensity of the poles and the speed of rotation, they are thrown away in[Pg 15] a direction always opposite to the supposed movement of the poles. If a paper with filings is put flat upon the ring and the current turned on suddenly, the existence of a magnetic whirl may easily be observed.

This spinning of the poles shows up in a number of interesting ways. If you bring a finely balanced disc made of steel or another magnetic metal close to the ring, it starts to spin quickly, and the direction of the spin changes based on where the disc is positioned. For example, if you check the direction outside the ring, you'll see that inside the ring it spins in the opposite direction, while it doesn't spin at all if it's placed in a position symmetrical to the ring. This can be easily understood. Each time a pole gets close, it creates an opposite pole at the nearest point on the disc, causing an attraction to that point. As the pole moves further away from the disc, a sideways pull is applied to it, and since this happens repeatedly, the disc ends up spinning at a faster or slower rate. Because the pull affects mostly the part closest to the ring, the spinning direction outside and inside, or to the right and left, is different, as seen in Fig. 9. When the disc is in a symmetrical position to the ring, the pull on both sides of the disc is equal, so there is no spinning. This effect relies on the magnetic inertia of iron; that's why a disc made of hard steel is influenced much more than a soft iron disc, which can quickly change its magnetism. Such a disc has proven to be a very useful tool in these experiments, allowing me to notice any inconsistencies in the action. An interesting effect is also seen with iron filings. If you place some on a piece of paper and hold it close to the ring, they start to vibrate while staying in the same spot, even if you move the paper back and forth; however, when you lift the paper to a certain height, which seems to depend on how strong the poles are and how fast they are rotating, the filings are pushed away in a direction always opposite to the expected movement of the poles. If you lay a piece of paper with filings flat on the ring and suddenly turn on the current, you can easily see the presence of a magnetic whirl.

To demonstrate the complete analogy between the ring and a revolving magnet, a strongly energized electro-magnet was rotated by mechanical power, and phenomena identical in every particular to those mentioned above were observed.

To show the full analogy between the ring and a spinning magnet, a powerful electromagnet was rotated using mechanical power, and exactly the same phenomena as those described above were observed.

Obviously, the rotation of the poles produces corresponding inductive effects and may be utilized to generate currents in a closed conductor placed within the influence of the poles. For this purpose it is convenient to wind a ring with two sets of superimposed coils forming respectively the primary and secondary circuits, as shown in Fig. 10. In order to secure the most economical results the magnetic circuit should be completely closed, and with this object in view the construction may be modified at will.

Obviously, the rotation of the poles creates related inductive effects and can be used to generate currents in a closed conductor that is within the influence of the poles. For this purpose, it's helpful to wind a ring with two sets of overlapping coils forming the primary and secondary circuits, as shown in Fig. 10. To achieve the most efficient results, the magnetic circuit should be fully closed, and with this goal in mind, the design can be adjusted as needed.

Fig. 8. Fig. 8.
Fig. 8a. Fig. 8a.

The inductive effect exerted upon the secondary coils will be mainly due to the shifting or movement of the magnetic action; but there may also be currents set up in the circuits in consequence of the variations in the intensity of the poles. However, by properly designing the generator and determining the magnetizing effect of the primary coils, the latter element may be made to disappear. The intensity of the poles being maintained constant, the action of the apparatus will be perfect, and the same result will be secured as though the shifting were effected by means of a commutator with an infinite number of bars. In such case the theoretical relation between the energizing effect of each set of primary coils and their resultant magnetizing effect may be expressed by the equation of a circle having its centre coinciding with that of an orthogonal system of axes, and in which the radius represents the resultant and the co-ordinates both[Pg 16] of its components. These are then respectively the sine and cosine of the angle α between the radius and one of the axes (O X). Referring to Fig. 11, we have r2 = x2 + y2; where x = r cos α, and y = r sin α.

The inductive effect on the secondary coils mainly comes from the movement of the magnetic action, but there can also be currents generated in the circuits due to changes in the strength of the poles. However, by properly designing the generator and determining the magnetizing effect of the primary coils, this latter issue can be eliminated. With the intensity of the poles kept constant, the operation of the apparatus will be flawless, achieving the same outcome as if the shifting were done with a commutator that has an infinite number of bars. In this case, the theoretical relationship between the energizing effect of each set of primary coils and their resultant magnetizing effect can be represented by the equation of a circle centered at the origin of an orthogonal coordinate system, where the radius represents the resultant, and the coordinates represent both[Pg 16] of its components. These components are the sine and cosine of the angle α between the radius and one of the axes (O X). Referring to Fig. 11, we have r2 = x2 + y2; where x = r cos α, and y = r sin α.

Assuming the magnetizing effect of each set of coils in the transformer to be proportional to the current—which may be admitted for weak degrees of magnetization—then x = Kc and y = Kc1, where K is a constant and c and c1 the current in both sets of coils respectively. Supposing, further, the field of the generator to be uniform, we have for constant speed c1 = K1 sin α and c = K1 sin (90° + α) = K1 cos α, where K1 is a constant. See Fig. 12.

Assuming the magnetizing effect of each set of coils in the transformer is proportional to the current—which is reasonable for low levels of magnetization—then x = Kc and y = Kc1, where K is a constant and c and c1 are the currents in both sets of coils, respectively. Furthermore, if we assume the generator's field is uniform, for constant speed we have c1 = K1 sin α and c = K1 sin (90° + α) = K1 cos α, where K1 is a constant. See Fig. 12.

Therefore,

Therefore,

x = K c = K K1 cos α;
y = K c1 = K K1 sin α; and
K K1 = r.

x = K c = K K1 cos α;
y = K c1 = K K1 sin α; and
K K1 = r.

Fig. 9. Fig. 9.

That is, for a uniform field the disposition of the two coils at right angles will secure the theoretical result, and the intensity of the shifting poles will be constant. But from r2 = x2 + y2 it follows that for y = 0, r = x; it follows that the joint magnetizing effect of both sets of coils should be equal to the effect of one set when at its maximum action. In transformers and in a certain class of motors the fluctuation of the poles is not of great importance, but in another class of these motors it is desirable to obtain the theoretical result.

For a uniform field, placing the two coils at right angles will achieve the theoretical outcome, and the intensity of the shifting poles will remain constant. However, from r2 = x2 + y2, it follows that when y = 0, r = x; this means that the combined magnetizing effect of both sets of coils should equal the effect of one set when it is at its maximum efficiency. In transformers and certain types of motors, the fluctuation of the poles isn't very significant, but in another category of these motors, achieving the theoretical result is important.

In applying this principle to the construction of motors, two typical forms of motor have been developed. First, a form having a comparatively small rotary effort at the start but maintaining a perfectly uniform speed at all loads, which motor has been termed synchronous. Second, a form possessing a great rotary effort at the start, the speed being dependent on the load.[Pg 17]

By applying this principle to motor design, two common types of motors have emerged. The first type has relatively low starting torque but maintains a consistent speed regardless of the load, known as a synchronous motor. The second type generates high starting torque, with its speed varying based on the load.[Pg 17]

These motors may be operated in three different ways: 1. By the alternate currents of the source only. 2. By a combined action of these and of induced currents. 3. By the joint action of alternate and continuous currents.

These motors can be operated in three different ways: 1. By using only the alternating currents from the source. 2. By a combination of those and induced currents. 3. By the joint action of both alternating and direct currents.

Fig. 10. Fig. 10.

The simplest form of a synchronous motor is obtained by winding a laminated ring provided with pole projections with four coils, and connecting the same in the manner before indicated. An iron disc having a segment cut away on each side may be used as an armature. Such a motor is shown in Fig. 9. The disc being arranged to rotate freely within the ring in close proximity to the projections, it is evident that as the poles are shifted it will, owing to its tendency to place itself in such a position as to embrace the greatest number of the lines of force, closely follow the movement of the poles, and its motion will be synchronous with that of the armature of the generator; that is, in the peculiar disposition shown in Fig. 9, in which the armature produces by one revolution two current impulses in each of the circuits. It is evident that if, by one revolution of the armature, a greater number of impulses is produced, the speed of the motor will be correspondingly increased. Considering that the attraction exerted upon the disc is greatest when the same is in close proximity to the poles, it follows that such a motor will maintain exactly the same speed at all loads within the limits of its capacity.

The simplest type of synchronous motor is made by winding a laminated ring with pole projections using four coils, and connecting them as mentioned earlier. An iron disc with segments cut away on each side can serve as the armature. This motor is illustrated in Fig. 9. The disc is arranged to rotate freely within the ring, close to the projections. As the poles shift, the disc aligns itself to capture the most lines of force, closely following the pole movements, and its motion will sync with the armature of the generator. In the setup shown in Fig. 9, the armature generates two current impulses in each circuit with one full revolution. If the armature produces more impulses with each revolution, the motor's speed will increase accordingly. Since the attraction on the disc is strongest when it is near the poles, this motor will maintain the same speed regardless of load, as long as it's within its capacity limits.

To facilitate the starting, the disc may be provided with a coil closed upon itself. The advantage secured by such a coil is evident. On the start the currents set up in the coil strongly ener[Pg 18]gize the disc and increase the attraction exerted upon the same by the ring, and currents being generated in the coil as long as the speed of the armature is inferior to that of the poles, considerable work may be performed by such a motor even if the speed be below normal. The intensity of the poles being constant, no currents will be generated in the coil when the motor is turning at its normal speed.

To make starting easier, the disc can have a coil that loops back on itself. The benefit of this coil is clear. When starting, the currents produced in the coil significantly energize the disc and enhance the attraction it feels from the ring. As long as the speed of the armature is less than that of the poles, currents will continue to be generated in the coil, allowing the motor to perform considerable work even if its speed is lower than normal. Since the intensity of the poles remains constant, no currents will be generated in the coil when the motor operates at its normal speed.

Instead of closing the coil upon itself, its ends may be connected to two insulated sliding rings, and a continuous current supplied to these from a suitable generator. The proper way to start such a motor is to close the coil upon itself until the normal speed is reached, or nearly so, and then turn on the continuous current. If the disc be very strongly energized by a continuous current the motor may not be able to start, but if it be weakly energized, or generally so that the magnetizing effect of the ring is preponderating, it will start and reach the normal speed. Such a motor will maintain absolutely the same speed at all loads. It has also been found that if the motive power of the generator is not excessive, by checking the motor the speed of the generator is diminished in synchronism with that of the motor. It is characteristic of this form of motor that it cannot be reversed by reversing the continuous current through the coil.

Instead of closing the coil onto itself, its ends can be connected to two insulated sliding rings, with a continuous current supplied to them from a suitable generator. The right way to start this kind of motor is to close the coil onto itself until it nearly reaches the normal speed, and then switch on the continuous current. If the disc is highly energized by a continuous current, the motor might not be able to start, but if it is weakly energized, or generally so that the magnetizing effect of the ring is dominant, it will start and reach the normal speed. This type of motor maintains the same speed regardless of the load. It has also been observed that if the generator's power isn't excessive, slowing down the motor will also decrease the generator's speed in sync with that of the motor. One characteristic of this type of motor is that it cannot be reversed simply by reversing the continuous current through the coil.

Fig. 11. Fig. 11.
Fig. 12. Fig. 12.

The synchronism of these motors may be demonstrated experimentally in a variety of ways. For this purpose it is best to employ a motor consisting of a stationary field magnet and an armature arranged to rotate within the same, as indicated in Fig. 13. In this case the shifting of the poles of the armature produces a rotation of the latter in the opposite direction. It results therefrom that when the normal speed is reached, the poles of the armature assume fixed positions relatively to the[Pg 19] field magnet, and the same is magnetized by induction, exhibiting a distinct pole on each of the pole-pieces. If a piece of soft iron is approached to the field magnet, it will at the start be attracted with a rapid vibrating motion produced by the reversals of polarity of the magnet, but as the speed of the armature increases, the vibrations become less and less frequent and finally entirely cease. Then the iron is weakly but permanently attracted, showing that synchronism is reached and the field magnet energized by induction.

The synchronization of these motors can be shown through various experiments. For this, it's best to use a motor that has a stationary field magnet and an armature that rotates within it, as shown in Fig. 13. Here, the movement of the armature's poles causes it to rotate in the opposite direction. As a result, when the normal speed is achieved, the armature's poles stay in fixed positions relative to the field magnet, which also becomes magnetized by induction, displaying a distinct pole on each of its pole-pieces. If a piece of soft iron is brought near the field magnet, it will initially be attracted with quick vibrations caused by the magnet's changing polarity, but as the armature speeds up, the vibrations become less frequent and eventually stop altogether. At that point, the iron is weakly but permanently attracted, indicating that synchronization has been reached and the field magnet is energized by induction.

The disc may also be used for the experiment. If held quite close to the armature it will turn as long as the speed of rotation of the poles exceeds that of the armature; but when the normal speed is reached, or very nearly so, it ceases to rotate and is permanently attracted.

The disc can also be used for the experiment. If it's held close to the armature, it will keep turning as long as the speed of rotation of the poles is higher than that of the armature; but once the normal speed is reached, or almost reached, it stops rotating and is permanently attracted.

Fig. 13. Fig. 13.

A crude but illustrative experiment is made with an incandescent lamp. Placing the lamp in circuit with the continuous current generator and in series with the magnet coil, rapid fluctuations are observed in the light in consequence of the induced currents set up in the coil at the start; the speed increasing, the fluctuations occur at longer intervals, until they entirely disappear, showing that the motor has attained its normal speed. A telephone receiver affords a most sensitive instrument; when connected to any circuit in the motor the synchronism may be easily detected on the disappearance of the induced currents.

A simple but effective experiment is conducted with an incandescent lamp. By connecting the lamp to a continuous current generator and placing it in series with the magnet coil, quick changes in the light are seen due to the induced currents that occur in the coil at the beginning; as the speed increases, the fluctuations happen at longer intervals until they completely fade away, indicating that the motor has reached its normal speed. A telephone receiver serves as a very sensitive tool; when connected to any circuit in the motor, it's easy to detect synchronization when the induced currents disappear.

In motors of the synchronous type it is desirable to maintain[Pg 20] the quantity of the shifting magnetism constant, especially if the magnets are not properly subdivided.

In synchronous motors, it's important to keep the amount of shifting magnetism constant, especially if the magnets aren't well divided.

To obtain a rotary effort in these motors was the subject of long thought. In order to secure this result it was necessary to make such a disposition that while the poles of one element of the motor are shifted by the alternate currents of the source, the poles produced upon the other elements should always be maintained in the proper relation to the former, irrespective of the speed of the motor. Such a condition exists in a continuous current motor; but in a synchronous motor, such as described, this condition is fulfilled only when the speed is normal.

To achieve rotary motion in these motors took a lot of consideration. To get this result, it was essential to arrange things so that while the poles of one part of the motor are shifted by the alternating currents from the source, the poles created in the other parts are always kept in the right relationship to the first, regardless of the motor's speed. This condition is present in a direct current motor; however, in a synchronous motor, like the one described, this condition is met only when the speed is normal.

Fig. 14. Fig. 14.

The object has been attained by placing within the ring a properly subdivided cylindrical iron core wound with several independent coils closed upon themselves. Two coils at right angles as in Fig. 14, are sufficient, but a greater number may be advantageously employed. It results from this disposition that when the poles of the ring are shifted, currents are generated in the closed armature coils. These currents are the most intense at or near the points of the greatest density of the lines of force, and their effect is to produce poles upon the armature at right angles to those of the ring, at least theoretically so; and since this action is entirely independent of the speed—that is, as far as the location of the poles is concerned—a continuous pull is exerted upon the periphery of the armature. In many respects these motors are similar to the continuous current motors. If load is put on, the speed, and also the resistance of the motor, is diminished and more current is made to pass through the energizing coils, thus[Pg 21] increasing the effort. Upon the load being taken off, the counter-electromotive force increases and less current passes through the primary or energizing coils. Without any load the speed is very nearly equal to that of the shifting poles of the field magnet.

The goal has been achieved by placing a properly divided cylindrical iron core inside the ring, which is wrapped with several independent coils that are closed looped. Two coils positioned at right angles, as shown in Fig. 14, are enough, but using more can be beneficial. Because of this arrangement, when the poles of the ring are moved, currents are generated in the closed armature coils. These currents are strongest at or near the points where the lines of force are densest, creating poles on the armature that are perpendicular to those of the ring, at least in theory; and since this action is completely independent of speed—in terms of where the poles are located—a continuous pull is applied to the edges of the armature. In many ways, these motors function similarly to direct current motors. When a load is applied, the speed decreases along with the motor's resistance, and more current flows through the energizing coils, thereby increasing the output. When the load is removed, the counter-electromotive force rises, causing less current to flow through the primary or energizing coils. With no load applied, the speed closely matches that of the moving poles of the field magnet.

Fig. 15, 16, 17.
Fig. 15.Fig. 16.Fig. 17.

It will be found that the rotary effort in these motors fully equals that of the continuous current motors. The effort seems to be greatest when both armature and field magnet are without any projections; but as in such dispositions the field cannot be concentrated, probably the best results will be obtained by leaving pole projections on one of the elements only. Generally, it may be stated the projections diminish the torque and produce a tendency to synchronism.

It will be found that the rotary power in these motors is equal to that of continuous current motors. The power seems to be greatest when both the armature and the field magnet don’t have any projections; however, since the field can’t be concentrated in such setups, the best results will likely come from leaving pole projections on just one of the elements. In general, it can be said that the projections reduce the torque and create a tendency toward synchronism.

A characteristic feature of motors of this kind is their property of being very rapidly reversed. This follows from the peculiar action of the motor. Suppose the armature to be rotating and the direction of rotation of the poles to be reversed. The apparatus then represents a dynamo machine, the power to drive this machine being the momentum stored up in the armature and its speed being the sum of the speeds of the armature and the poles.

A key feature of these types of motors is their ability to reverse direction very quickly. This results from the unique operation of the motor. Imagine that the armature is spinning and the direction of the poles is flipped. The setup then functions as a dynamo machine, with the energy needed to drive this machine coming from the momentum stored in the armature, and its speed being the total of the speeds of the armature and the poles.

Fig. 18, 19, 20, 21.
Fig. 18.Fig. 19.Fig. 20.Fig. 21.

If we now consider that the power to drive such a dynamo would be very nearly proportional to the third power of the speed, for that reason alone the armature should be quickly reversed. But simultaneously with the reversal another element is brought into action, namely, as the movement of the poles with respect to the armature is reversed, the motor acts like a transformer in which the resistance of the secondary circuit would be[Pg 22] abnormally diminished by producing in this circuit an additional electromotive force. Owing to these causes the reversal is instantaneous.

If we now think about the fact that the power needed to run such a dynamo would be almost proportional to the cube of the speed, that alone means the armature should reverse quickly. But at the same time as the reversal, another factor is activated. As the movement of the poles relative to the armature is reversed, the motor acts like a transformer where the resistance of the secondary circuit would be[Pg 22] unusually reduced by generating an extra electromotive force in this circuit. Because of these factors, the reversal happens instantly.

If it is desirable to secure a constant speed, and at the same time a certain effort at the start, this result may be easily attained in a variety of ways. For instance, two armatures, one for torque and the other for synchronism, may be fastened on the same shaft and any desired preponderance may be given to either one, or an armature may be wound for rotary effort, but a more or less pronounced tendency to synchronism may be given to it by properly constructing the iron core; and in many other ways.

If you want to achieve a constant speed while also having a specific amount of effort at the start, you can easily do this in several ways. For example, you can attach two armatures—one for torque and the other for synchronism—onto the same shaft, allowing you to give either one a greater emphasis. Alternatively, you can design an armature for rotary effort and enhance its synchronism by properly constructing the iron core, among many other methods.

As a means of obtaining the required phase of the currents in both the circuits, the disposition of the two coils at right angles is the simplest, securing the most uniform action; but the phase may be obtained in many other ways, varying with the machine employed. Any of the dynamos at present in use may be easily adapted for this purpose by making connections to proper points of the generating coils. In closed circuit armatures, such as used in the continuous current systems, it is best to make four derivations from equi-distant points or bars of the commutator, and to connect the same to four insulated sliding rings on the shaft. In this case each of the motor circuits is connected to two diametrically opposite bars of the commutator. In such a disposition the motor may also be operated at half the potential and on the three-wire plan, by connecting the motor circuits in the proper order to three of the contact rings.

To achieve the necessary phase of the currents in both circuits, placing the two coils at right angles is the simplest method and ensures the most consistent action. However, there are many other ways to obtain the phase, depending on the machine used. Any of the dynamos currently available can be easily modified for this purpose by connecting to the appropriate points on the generating coils. For closed circuit armatures, like those used in continuous current systems, it's best to make four connections from evenly spaced points or bars on the commutator and connect them to four insulated sliding rings on the shaft. In this setup, each motor circuit is linked to two opposite bars of the commutator. With this arrangement, the motor can also function at half the potential and using the three-wire system by connecting the motor circuits in the correct order to three of the contact rings.

In multipolar dynamo machines, such as used in the converter systems, the phase is conveniently obtained by winding upon the armature two series of coils in such a manner that while the coils of one set or series are at their maximum production of current, the coils of the other will be at their neutral position, or nearly so, whereby both sets of coils may be subjected simultaneously or successively to the inducing action of the field magnets.

In multipolar dynamo machines, like those used in converter systems, the phase is easily achieved by winding two sets of coils onto the armature in such a way that when one set is producing maximum current, the other set is at or close to its neutral position. This allows both sets of coils to be exposed to the inducing action of the field magnets at the same time or one after the other.

Generally the circuits in the motor will be similarly disposed, and various arrangements may be made to fulfill the requirements; but the simplest and most practicable is to arrange primary circuits on stationary parts of the motor, thereby obviating, at least in certain forms, the employment of sliding contacts. In such a case the magnet coils are connected alternately in both the circuits; that is, 1, 3, 5 ... in one, and 2, 4, 6 ... in the other, and the coils of each set of series may be connected all in the same[Pg 23] manner, or alternately in opposition; in the latter case a motor with half the number of poles will result, and its action will be correspondingly modified. The Figs. 15, 16, and 17, show three different phases, the magnet coils in each circuit being connected alternately in opposition. In this case there will be always four poles, as in Figs. 15 and 17; four pole projections will be neutral; and in Fig. 16 two adjacent pole projections will have the same polarity. If the coils are connected in the same manner there will be eight alternating poles, as indicated by the letters n' s' in Fig. 15.

Generally, the circuits in the motor will be similarly arranged, and different setups can be created to meet the requirements; however, the simplest and most practical option is to organize primary circuits on the stationary parts of the motor, which eliminates, at least in some cases, the need for sliding contacts. In this scenario, the magnet coils are connected alternately in both circuits; that is, 1, 3, 5 ... in one, and 2, 4, 6 ... in the other, and the coils of each series can be connected all in the same way[Pg 23] or alternatively in opposition. In the latter case, a motor with half the number of poles will be created, and its operation will be adjusted accordingly. Figures 15, 16, and 17 show three different phases, with the magnet coils in each circuit connected alternately in opposition. In this case, there will always be four poles, as seen in Figures 15 and 17; four pole projections will be neutral; and in Figure 16, two adjacent pole projections will have the same polarity. If the coils are connected in the same way, there will be eight alternating poles, indicated by the letters n' s' in Figure 15.

The employment of multipolar motors secures in this system an advantage much desired and unattainable in the continuous current system, and that is, that a motor may be made to run exactly at a predetermined speed irrespective of imperfections in construction, of the load, and, within certain limits, of electromotive force and current strength.

The use of multipolar motors provides a significant advantage in this system that is hard to achieve with the direct current system. Specifically, it allows a motor to operate at a specific speed regardless of construction flaws, the load, and, within certain limits, variations in electromotive force and current strength.

In a general distribution system of this kind the following plan should be adopted. At the central station of supply a generator should be provided having a considerable number of poles. The motors operated from this generator should be of the synchronous type, but possessing sufficient rotary effort to insure their starting. With the observance of proper rules of construction it may be admitted that the speed of each motor will be in some inverse proportion to its size, and the number of poles should be chosen accordingly. Still, exceptional demands may modify this rule. In view of this, it will be advantageous to provide each motor with a greater number of pole projections or coils, the number being preferably a multiple of two and three. By this means, by simply changing the connections of the coils, the motor may be adapted to any probable demands.

In a general distribution system like this, the following plan should be implemented. At the main supply station, there should be a generator with a significant number of poles. The motors powered by this generator should be synchronous types but with enough rotational force to ensure they start up. With proper construction rules in mind, it's understood that the speed of each motor will be inversely related to its size, so the number of poles should be selected accordingly. However, unusual demands might alter this guideline. Therefore, it would be beneficial to equip each motor with a higher number of pole projections or coils, ideally as multiples of two and three. This way, by simply altering the connections of the coils, the motor can be adjusted to meet any expected demands.

If the number of the poles in the motor is even, the action will be harmonious and the proper result will be obtained; if this is not the case, the best plan to be followed is to make a motor with a double number of poles and connect the same in the manner before indicated, so that half the number of poles result. Suppose, for instance, that the generator has twelve poles, and it would be desired to obtain a speed equal to 12/7 of the speed of the generator. This would require a motor with seven pole projections or magnets, and such a motor could not be properly connected in the circuits unless fourteen armature coils would be provided, which would necessitate the employment of sliding[Pg 24] contacts. To avoid this, the motor should be provided with fourteen magnets and seven connected in each circuit, the magnets in each circuit alternating among themselves. The armature should have fourteen closed coils. The action of the motor will not be quite as perfect as in the case of an even number of poles, but the drawback will not be of a serious nature.

If the number of poles in the motor is even, the operation will be smooth, and the desired outcome will be achieved; if it’s not even, the best approach is to create a motor with double the number of poles and connect it as previously mentioned, resulting in half the number of poles. For example, if the generator has twelve poles and we want to achieve a speed of 12/7 of the generator's speed, we would need a motor with seven pole projections or magnets. This motor wouldn't be able to connect properly in the circuits unless there were fourteen armature coils, which would require sliding[Pg 24] contacts. To avoid this issue, the motor should have fourteen magnets, with seven connected in each circuit, alternating with each other. The armature should consist of fourteen closed coils. The motor’s performance won’t be as perfect as with an even number of poles, but the downsides won’t be significant.

However, the disadvantages resulting from this unsymmetrical form will be reduced in the same proportion as the number of the poles is augmented.

However, the drawbacks from this uneven shape will decrease in the same way as the number of poles increases.

If the generator has, say, n, and the motor n1 poles, the speed of the motor will be equal to that of the generator multiplied by n/n1.

If the generator has, let's say, n, and the motor n1 poles, the speed of the motor will be the same as the generator's speed multiplied by n/n1.

The speed of the motor will generally be dependent on the number of the poles, but there may be exceptions to this rule. The speed may be modified by the phase of the currents in the circuit or by the character of the current impulses or by intervals between each or between groups of impulses. Some of the possible cases are indicated in the diagrams, Figs. 18, 19, 20 and 21, which are self-explanatory. Fig. 18 represents the condition generally existing, and which secures the best result. In such a case, if the typical form of motor illustrated in Fig. 9 is employed, one complete wave in each circuit will produce one revolution of the motor. In Fig. 19 the same result will be effected by one wave in each circuit, the impulses being successive; in Fig. 20 by four, and in Fig. 21 by eight waves.

The speed of the motor usually depends on the number of poles, but there can be exceptions to this rule. The speed can be adjusted by the phase of the currents in the circuit, the nature of the current impulses, or the intervals between individual impulses or groups of impulses. Some potential scenarios are shown in the diagrams, Figs. 18, 19, 20, and 21, which clearly illustrate the concepts. Fig. 18 shows the usual condition that achieves the best results. In this case, if the typical motor design shown in Fig. 9 is used, one complete wave in each circuit will result in one revolution of the motor. In Fig. 19, the same outcome will be achieved with one wave in each circuit, with the impulses occurring one after another; in Fig. 20, it takes four waves, and in Fig. 21, it takes eight waves.

By such means any desired speed may be attained, that is, at least within the limits of practical demands. This system possesses this advantage, besides others, resulting from simplicity. At full loads the motors show an efficiency fully equal to that of the continuous current motors. The transformers present an additional advantage in their capability of operating motors. They are capable of similar modifications in construction, and will facilitate the introduction of motors and their adaptation to practical demands. Their efficiency should be higher than that of the present transformers, and I base my assertion on the following:

By using these methods, any speed we want can be achieved, at least within the limits of practical needs. This system has this advantage, along with others, due to its simplicity. Under full loads, the motors operate with an efficiency that is equal to that of continuous current motors. The transformers offer an extra benefit in their ability to run motors. They can be similarly modified in design and will make it easier to introduce motors and adapt them to practical needs. Their efficiency should be greater than that of the current transformers, and I support my claim with the following:

In a transformer, as constructed at present, we produce the currents in the secondary circuit by varying the strength of the primary or exciting currents. If we admit proportionality with respect to the iron core the inductive effect exerted upon the[Pg 25] secondary coil will be proportional to the numerical sum of the variations in the strength of the exciting current per unit of time; whence it follows that for a given variation any prolongation of the primary current will result in a proportional loss. In order to obtain rapid variations in the strength of the current, essential to efficient induction, a great number of undulations are employed; from this practice various disadvantages result. These are: Increased cost and diminished efficiency of the generator; more waste of energy in heating the cores, and also diminished output of the transformer, since the core is not properly utilized, the reversals being too rapid. The inductive effect is also very small in certain phases, as will be apparent from a graphic representation, and there may be periods of inaction, if there are intervals between the succeeding current impulses or waves. In producing a shifting of the poles in a transformer, and thereby inducing currents, the induction is of the ideal character, being always maintained at its maximum action. It is also reasonable to assume that by a shifting of the poles less energy will be wasted than by reversals.

In a modern transformer, we generate currents in the secondary circuit by adjusting the strength of the primary or exciting currents. If we assume a direct relationship with the iron core, the inductive effect on the [Pg 25] secondary coil will be proportional to the total changes in the strength of the exciting current over time. This means that for a given change, extending the primary current will result in a proportional loss. To achieve quick changes in current strength, which are crucial for efficient induction, many fluctuations are used; however, this practice has several downsides. These include increased costs and reduced efficiency of the generator, more energy wasted as heat in the cores, and a lower output from the transformer since the core is not used effectively, as the reversals happen too quickly. The inductive effect is also minimal during certain phases, which will be clear from a graphical representation, and there may be periods of inactivity if there are gaps between subsequent current impulses or waves. When shifting the poles in a transformer to induce currents, the induction is ideal, consistently maintained at its peak performance. It's also reasonable to expect that pole shifting will waste less energy than reversals.


CHAPTER IV.

Modifications and Expansions of the Tesla Polyphase Systems.

In his earlier papers and patents relative to polyphase currents, Mr. Tesla devoted himself chiefly to an enunciation of the broad lines and ideas lying at the basis of this new work; but he supplemented this immediately by a series of other striking inventions which may be regarded as modifications and expansions of certain features of the Tesla systems. These we shall now proceed to deal with.

In his earlier papers and patents on polyphase currents, Mr. Tesla focused primarily on outlining the key concepts and ideas behind this new work; however, he quickly followed this up with a series of other impressive inventions that can be seen as modifications and expansions of specific elements of the Tesla systems. We'll now move on to discuss these.

In the preceding chapters we have thus shown and described the Tesla electrical systems for the transmission of power and the conversion and distribution of electrical energy, in which the motors and the transformers contain two or more coils or sets of coils, which were connected up in independent circuits with corresponding coils of an alternating current generator, the operation of the system being brought about by the co-operation of the alternating currents in the independent circuits in progressively moving or shifting the poles or points of maximum magnetic effect of the motors or converters. In these systems two independent conductors are employed for each of the independent circuits connecting the generator with the devices for converting the transmitted currents into mechanical energy or into electric currents of another character. This, however, is not always necessary. The two or more circuits may have a single return path or wire in common, with a loss, if any, which is so extremely slight that it may be disregarded entirely. For the sake of illustration, if the generator have two independent coils and the motor two coils or two sets of coils in corresponding relations to its operative elements one terminal of each generator coil is connected to the corresponding terminals of the motor coils through two independent conductors, while the opposite terminals of the respective coils are both connected to one return wire. The following description deals with the modifica[Pg 27]tion. Fig. 22 is a diagrammatic illustration of a generator and single motor constructed and electrically connected in accordance with the invention. Fig. 23 is a diagram of the system as it is used in operating motors or converters, or both, in parallel, while Fig. 24 illustrates diagrammatically the manner of operating two or more motors or converters, or both, in series. Referring to Fig. 22, A A designate the poles of the field magnets of an alternating-current generator, the armature of which, being in this case cylindrical in form and mounted on a shaft, C, is wound longitudinally with coils B B'. The shaft C carries three insulated contact-rings, a b c, to two of which, as b c, one terminal of each coil, as e d, is connected. The remaining terminals, f g, are both connected to the third ring, a.

In the previous chapters, we have shown and explained the Tesla electrical systems for transmitting power and converting and distributing electrical energy. These systems feature motors and transformers that have two or more coils or sets of coils. These coils are linked in independent circuits with the corresponding coils of an alternating current generator. The system operates through the cooperation of the alternating currents in these independent circuits, which progressively shift the poles or points of maximum magnetic effect of the motors or converters. Each independent circuit connecting the generator to the devices that convert the transmitted currents into mechanical energy or different types of electric currents uses two separate conductors. However, this isn't always necessary. The circuits can share a single return path or wire, with any loss being so minimal that it can be ignored. For example, if the generator has two independent coils and the motor has two coils or two sets of coils that correspond to its operational elements, one terminal of each generator coil connects to the corresponding terminals of the motor coils via two independent conductors. The opposite terminals of both sets of coils are connected to a single return wire. The following description addresses the modification. [Pg 27] Fig. 22 provides a diagram showing a generator and a single motor constructed and wired in accordance with this invention. Fig. 23 illustrates the system as it operates motors or converters, or both, in parallel, while Fig. 24 shows how to operate two or more motors or converters, or both, in series. In Fig. 22, A A indicates the poles of the field magnets of an alternating-current generator, which has a cylindrical armature mounted on a shaft, C, and wound longitudinally with coils B B'. The shaft C has three insulated contact rings, a b c, to which one terminal of each coil, e d, is connected to two of them, b c. The other terminals, f g, are both linked to the third ring, a.

Fig. 22. Fig. 22.
Fig. 24. Fig. 24.

A motor in this case is shown as composed of a ring, H, wound with four coils, I I J J, electrically connected, so as to co-operate in pairs, with a tendency to fix the poles of the ring at four points ninety degrees apart. Within the magnetic ring H is a disc or cylindrical core wound with two coils, G G', which may be con[Pg 28]nected to form two closed circuits. The terminals j k of the two sets or pairs of coils are connected, respectively, to the binding-posts E' F', and the other terminals, h i, are connected to a single binding-post, D'. To operate the motor, three line-wires are used to connect the terminals of the generator with those of the motor.

A motor in this case is shown as made up of a ring, H, wrapped with four coils, I I J J, that are electrically connected to work in pairs, aiming to stabilize the poles of the ring at four points ninety degrees apart. Inside the magnetic ring H is a disc or cylindrical core wrapped with two coils, G G', which can be connected to form two closed circuits. The terminals j k of the two sets or pairs of coils are connected to the binding-posts E' F', while the other terminals, h i, are connected to a single binding-post, D'. To operate the motor, three line wires are used to connect the terminals of the generator to those of the motor.

Fig. 23. Fig. 23.

So far as the apparent action or mode of operation of this arrangement is concerned, the single wire D, which is, so to speak, a common return-wire for both circuits, may be regarded as two independent wires. In the illustration, with the order of connection shown, coil B' of the generator is producing its maximum current and coil B its minimum; hence the current which passes through wire e, ring b, brush b', line-wire E, terminal E', wire j, coils I I, wire or terminal D', line-wire D, brush a', ring a, and wire f, fixes the polar line of the motor midway between the[Pg 29] two coils I I; but as the coil B' moves from the position indicated it generates less current, while coil B, moving into the field, generates more. The current from coil B passes through the devices and wires designated by the letters d, c, c' F, F' k, J J, i, D', D, a', a, and g, and the position of the poles of the motor will be due to the resultant effect of the currents in the two sets of coils—that is, it will be advanced in proportion to the advance or forward movement of the armature coils. The movement of the generator-armature through one-quarter of a revolution will obviously bring coil B' into its neutral position and coil B into its position of maximum effect, and this shifts the poles ninety degrees, as they are fixed solely by coils B. This action is repeated for each quarter of a complete revolution.

As far as how this setup works is concerned, the single wire D, which serves as a shared return wire for both circuits, can be thought of as two separate wires. In the illustration with the shown connection order, coil B' of the generator is producing its maximum current while coil B is producing its minimum. Therefore, the current that flows through wire e, ring b, brush b', line-wire E, terminal E', wire j, coils I I, wire or terminal D', line-wire D, brush a', ring a, and wire f positions the motor's polar line halfway between the[Pg 29] two coils I I. However, as coil B' moves away from the indicated position, it generates less current, while coil B, moving into the field, generates more. The current from coil B flows through the devices and wires labeled with the letters d, c, c' F, F' k, J J, i, D', D, a', a, and g. The position of the motor poles will be determined by the combined effect of the currents in the two sets of coils, meaning it will advance in relation to the forward movement of the armature coils. The generator armature moving through one-quarter of a revolution will clearly bring coil B' to its neutral position and coil B to its maximum effect position, shifting the poles ninety degrees since they are solely determined by coil B. This process repeats for each quarter of a full revolution.

When more than one motor or other device is employed, they may be run either in parallel or series. In Fig. 23 the former arrangement is shown. The electrical device is shown as a converter, L, of which the two sets of primary coils p r are connected, respectively, to the mains F E, which are electrically connected with the two coils of the generator. The cross-circuit wires l m, making these connections, are then connected to the common return-wire D. The secondary coils p' p'' are in circuits n o, including, for example, incandescent lamps. Only one converter is shown entire in this figure, the others being illustrated diagrammatically.

When more than one motor or device is used, they can be operated either in parallel or in series. Figure 23 shows the parallel setup. The electrical device appears as a converter, L, with two sets of primary coils p r that are connected to the mains F E, which are electrically linked to the two coils of the generator. The cross-circuit wires l m, which create these connections, are then connected to the common return-wire D. The secondary coils p' p'' are in circuits n o, which include, for example, incandescent lamps. Only one complete converter is shown in this figure, while the others are presented diagrammatically.

When motors or converters are to be run in series, the two wires E F are led from the generator to the coils of the first motor or converter, then continued on to the next, and so on through the whole series, and are then joined to the single wire D, which completes both circuits through the generator. This is shown in Fig. 24, in which J I represent the two coils or sets of coils of the motors.

When motors or converters are connected in series, the two wires E F run from the generator to the coils of the first motor or converter, then continue to the next one, and so on throughout the entire series. Finally, they connect to the single wire D, which completes both circuits through the generator. This is illustrated in Fig. 24, where J I represent the two coils or sets of coils of the motors.

There are, of course, other conditions under which the same idea may be carried out. For example, in case the motor and generator each has three independent circuits, one terminal of each circuit is connected to a line-wire, and the other three terminals to a common return-conductor. This arrangement will secure similar results to those attained with a generator and motor having but two independent circuits, as above described.

There are, of course, other situations where the same idea can be executed. For instance, if both the motor and generator have three separate circuits, one terminal of each circuit connects to a line wire, and the other three terminals connect to a shared return conductor. This setup will achieve results similar to those obtained with a generator and motor that only have two independent circuits, as described above.

When applied to such machines and motors as have three or more induced circuits with a common electrical joint, the three or more terminals of the generator would be simply connected[Pg 30] to those of the motor. Mr. Tesla states, however, that the results obtained in this manner show a lower efficiency than do the forms dwelt upon more fully above.

When used with machines and motors that have three or more induced circuits sharing a common electrical connection, the three or more terminals of the generator would just be connected to those of the motor. Mr. Tesla, however, notes that the results achieved this way show lower efficiency compared to the forms discussed in more detail above.[Pg 30]


CHAPTER V.

Using Familiar Types of Continuous Current Generators.

The preceding descriptions have assumed the use of alternating current generators in which, in order to produce the progressive movement of the magnetic poles, or of the resultant attraction of independent field magnets, the current generating coils are independent or separate. The ordinary forms of continuous current dynamos may, however, be employed for the same work, in accordance with a method of adaptation devised by Mr. Tesla. As will be seen, the modification involves but slight changes in their construction, and presents other elements of economy.

The previous descriptions have assumed the use of alternating current generators, where the current-generating coils are independent or separate to create the movement of the magnetic poles or the resulting attraction of independent field magnets. However, traditional continuous current dynamos can also be used for the same purpose, following a modification method developed by Mr. Tesla. As will be shown, this modification requires only minor changes in their construction and introduces other cost-saving elements.

On the shaft of a given generator, either in place of or in addition to the regular commutator, are secured as many pairs of insulated collecting-rings as there are circuits to be operated. Now, it will be understood that in the operation of any dynamo electric generator the currents in the coils in their movement through the field of force undergo different phases—that is to say, at different positions of the coils the currents have certain directions and certain strengths—and that in the Tesla motors or transformers it is necessary that the currents in the energizing coils should undergo a certain order of variations in strength and direction. Hence, the further step—viz., the connection between the induced or generating coils of the machine and the contact-rings from which the currents are to be taken off—will be determined solely by what order of variations of strength and direction in the currents is desired for producing a given result in the electrical translating device. This may be accomplished in various ways; but in the drawings we give typical instances only of the best and most practicable ways of applying the invention to three of the leading types of machines in widespread use, in order to illustrate the principle.

On the shaft of a generator, instead of or in addition to the regular commutator, there are several pairs of insulated collecting rings for each circuit that needs to be operated. It's important to understand that when any dynamo electric generator operates, the currents in the coils experience different phases as they move through the magnetic field—meaning that the currents have specific directions and strengths at various positions of the coils. In Tesla motors or transformers, the currents in the energizing coils need to follow a specific order of changes in strength and direction. Therefore, the next step—connecting the induced or generating coils of the machine to the contact rings where the currents will be drawn—depends entirely on the desired order of variations in strength and direction to achieve a specific result in the electrical translating device. This can be done in different ways, but the drawings we provide show typical examples of the best and most practical methods of applying the invention to three major types of machines that are commonly used, to demonstrate the principle.

Fig. 25 is a diagram illustrative of the mode of applying the invention to the well-known type of "closed" or continuous cir[Pg 32]cuit machines. Fig. 26 is a similar diagram embodying an armature with separate coils connected diametrically, or what is generally called an "open-circuit" machine. Fig. 27 is a diagram showing the application of the invention to a machine the armature-coils of which have a common joint.

Fig. 25 is a diagram that shows how the invention can be applied to the familiar "closed" or continuous circuit machines. Fig. 26 is a similar diagram featuring an armature with separate coils connected diametrically, which is commonly known as an "open-circuit" machine. Fig. 27 is a diagram demonstrating the application of the invention to a machine where the armature coils have a common joint.

Fig. 25. Fig. 25.

Referring to Fig. 25, let A represent a Tesla motor or transformer which, for convenience, we will designate as a "converter." It consists of an annular core, B, wound with four independent coils, C and D, those diametrically opposite being connected together so as to co-operate in pairs in establishing free poles in the ring, the tendency of each pair being to fix the poles at ninety degrees from the other. There may be an armature, E, within the ring, which is wound with coils closed upon themselves. The object is to pass through coils C D currents of such relative strength and direction as to produce a progressive shifting or movement of the points of maximum magnetic effect around the ring, and to thereby maintain a rotary movement of the armature. There are therefore secured to the shaft F of the generator, four insulated contact-rings, a b c d, upon which bear[Pg 33] the collecting-brushes a' b' c' d', connected by wires G G H H, respectively, with the terminals of coils C and D.

Referring to Fig. 25, let A represent a Tesla motor or transformer, which we'll conveniently call a "converter." It has an annular core, B, wrapped with four independent coils, C and D, with the coils opposite each other connected in pairs to help create free poles in the ring. Each pair tends to position the poles at ninety degrees from each other. There might be an armature, E, inside the ring, wound with coils that loop back on themselves. The goal is to send currents through coils C D with the right strength and direction to create a progressive shift or movement of the points of maximum magnetic effect around the ring, thus maintaining a rotary motion of the armature. As a result, four insulated contact rings, a b c d, are secured to the shaft F of the generator. The collecting brushes a' b' c' d' sit on those rings and are connected by wires G G H H to the terminals of coils C and D.

Assume, for sake of illustration, that the coils D D are to receive the maximum and coils C C at the same instant the minimum current, so that the polar line may be midway between the coils D D. The rings a b would therefore be connected to the continuous armature-coil at its neutral points with respect to the field, or the point corresponding with that of the ordinary commutator brushes, and between which exists the greatest difference of potential; while rings c d would be connected to two points in the coil, between which exists no difference of potential. The best results will be obtained by making these connections at points equidistant from one another, as shown. These connections are easiest made by using wires L between the rings and the loops or wires J, connecting the coil I to the segments of the commutator K. When the converters are made in this manner, it is evident that the phases of the currents in the sections of the generator coil will be reproduced in the converter coils. For example, after turning through an arc of ninety degrees the conductors L L, which before conveyed the maximum current, will receive the minimum current by reason of the change in the position of their coils, and it is evident that for the same reason the current in these coils has gradually fallen from the maximum to the minimum in passing through the arc of ninety degrees. In this special plan of connections, the rotation of the magnetic poles of the converter will be synchronous with that of the armature coils of the generator, and the result will be the same, whether the energizing circuits are derivations from a continuous armature coil or from independent coils, as in Mr. Tesla's other devices.

Assume, for the sake of illustration, that the coils D D are getting the maximum current while the coils C C are getting the minimum current at the same time, so the polar line is positioned halfway between the coils D D. The rings a b would then be connected to the continuous armature coil at its neutral points concerning the field, or the points that correspond to the typical commutator brushes, where there is the greatest difference in potential; meanwhile, rings c d would be connected to two points in the coil with no difference in potential. The best results will come from making these connections at points equidistant from one another, as shown. These connections are easiest created by using wires L between the rings and the loops or wires J, which connect the coil I to the segments of the commutator K. When the converters are set up this way, it becomes clear that the phases of the currents in the sections of the generator coil will be replicated in the converter coils. For instance, after rotating through an arc of ninety degrees, the conductors L L, which previously carried the maximum current, will now carry the minimum current due to the change in the position of their coils, and it’s clear that for the same reason, the current in these coils has gradually decreased from the maximum to the minimum as they passed through the ninety-degree arc. In this specific connection plan, the rotation of the magnetic poles of the converter will match that of the armature coils of the generator, and this outcome will be the same, whether the energizing circuits are derived from a continuous armature coil or from independent coils, like in Mr. Tesla's other devices.

In Fig. 25, the brushes M M are shown in dotted lines in their proper normal position. In practice these brushes may be removed from the commutator and the field of the generator excited by an external source of current; or the brushes may be allowed to remain on the commutator and to take off a converted current to excite the field, or to be used for other purposes.

In Fig. 25, the brushes M M are shown in dotted lines in their correct normal position. In practice, these brushes can be taken off the commutator, and the generator's field can be powered by an external current source; alternatively, the brushes can stay on the commutator to draw off a converted current to excite the field or be used for other purposes.

In a certain well-known class of machines known as the "open circuit," the armature contains a number of coils the terminals of which connect to commutator segments, the coils being connected across the armature in pairs. This type of machine is represented in Fig. 26. In this machine each pair of coils goes[Pg 34] through the same phases as the coils in some of the generators already shown, and it is obviously only necessary to utilize them in pairs or sets to operate a Tesla converter by extending the segments of the commutators belonging to each pair of coils and causing a collecting brush to bear on the continuous portion of each segment. In this way two or more circuits may be taken off from the generator, each including one or more pairs or sets of coils as may be desired.

In a certain well-known type of machine called an "open circuit," the armature has several coils whose terminals connect to commutator segments, with the coils linked in pairs across the armature. This type of machine is shown in Fig. 26. In this machine, each pair of coils goes[Pg 34] through the same phases as the coils in some of the generators already illustrated. It's clear that it’s only necessary to use them in pairs or sets to operate a Tesla converter by extending the segments of the commutators for each pair of coils and having a collecting brush make contact with the continuous part of each segment. This allows for two or more circuits to be drawn from the generator, each containing one or more pairs or sets of coils as needed.

Fig. 26, 27.
Fig. 26.Fig. 27.

In Fig. 26 I I represent the armature coils, T T the poles of the field magnet, and F the shaft carrying the commutators, which are extended to form continuous portions a b c d. The brushes bearing on the continuous portions for taking off the alternating currents are represented by a' b' c' d'. The collecting brushes, or those which may be used to take off the direct current, are designated by M M. Two pairs of the armature coils and their commutators are shown in the figure as being utilized; but all may be utilized in a similar manner.

In Fig. 26 I I represent the armature coils, T T the poles of the field magnet, and F the shaft that carries the commutators, which have been extended to create continuous sections a b c d. The brushes that contact the continuous sections to draw off the alternating currents are shown as a' b' c' d'. The collecting brushes, which can be used to draw off the direct current, are labeled as M M. The figure illustrates two pairs of the armature coils and their commutators in use; however, all can be used in a similar way.

There is another well-known type of machine in which three or more coils, A' B' C', on the armature have a common joint, the free ends being connected to the segments of a commutator. This form of generator is illustrated in Fig. 27. In this case each terminal of the generator is connected directly or in derivation to a continuous ring, a b c, and collecting brushes, a' b' c', bearing[Pg 35] thereon, take off the alternating currents that operate the motor. It is preferable in this case to employ a motor or transformer with three energizing coils, A'' B'' C'', placed symmetrically with those of the generator, and the circuits from the latter are connected to the terminals of such coils either directly—as when they are stationary—or by means of brushes e' and contact rings e. In this, as in the other cases, the ordinary commutator may be used on the generator, and the current taken from it utilized for exciting the generator field-magnets or for other purposes.

There is another well-known type of machine where three or more coils, A' B' C', on the armature have a shared joint, with the free ends connected to the segments of a commutator. This type of generator is shown in Fig. 27. In this scenario, each terminal of the generator connects directly or in a parallel way to a continuous ring, a b c, and collecting brushes, a' b' c', mounted on it draw off the alternating currents that power the motor. It's preferable to use a motor or transformer with three energizing coils, A'' B'' C'', arranged symmetrically with those of the generator. The circuits from the generator connect to the terminals of these coils either directly—when they are stationary—or via brushes e' and contact rings e. In this case, as in others, the regular commutator can be used on the generator, and the current taken from it can be used to excite the generator's field magnets or for other purposes.


CHAPTER VI.

How to Achieve the Desired Speed of a Motor or Generator.

With the object of obtaining the desired speed in motors operated by means of alternating currents of differing phase, Mr. Tesla has devised various plans intended to meet the practical requirements of the case, in adapting his system to types of multipolar alternating current machines yielding a large number of current reversals for each revolution.

To achieve the desired speed in motors powered by alternating currents of different phases, Mr. Tesla has come up with various plans designed to meet practical needs by adapting his system to multipolar alternating current machines that provide a high number of current reversals for each revolution.

For example, Mr. Tesla has pointed out that to adapt a given type of alternating current generator, you may couple rigidly two complete machines, securing them together in such a way that the requisite difference in phase will be produced; or you may fasten two armatures to the same shaft within the influence of the same field and with the requisite angular displacement to yield the proper difference in phase between the two currents; or two armatures may be attached to the same shaft with their coils symmetrically disposed, but subject to the influence of two sets of field magnets duly displaced; or the two sets of coils may be wound on the same armature alternately or in such manner that they will develop currents the phases of which differ in time sufficiently to produce the rotation of the motor.

For example, Mr. Tesla has noted that to adapt a specific type of alternating current generator, you can rigidly couple two complete machines, securing them in such a way that the necessary phase difference will be created; or you can attach two armatures to the same shaft within the same magnetic field but with the required angular displacement to generate the appropriate phase difference between the two currents; or you can connect two armatures to the same shaft with their coils positioned symmetrically, but under the influence of two separate sets of field magnets that are properly displaced; or the two sets of coils can be wound on the same armature alternately or arranged in such a way that they will generate currents with phase differences considerable enough to enable the motor to rotate.

Another method included in the scope of the same idea, whereby a single generator may run a number of motors either at its own rate of speed or all at different speeds, is to construct the motors with fewer poles than the generator, in which case their speed will be greater than that of the generator, the rate of speed being higher as the number of their poles is relatively less. This may be understood from an example, taking a generator that has two independent generating coils which revolve between two pole pieces oppositely magnetized; and a motor with energizing coils that produce at any given time two magnetic poles in one element that tend to set up a rotation of the motor. A generator thus constructed yields four reversals, or impulses, in each[Pg 37] revolution, two in each of its independent circuits; and the effect upon the motor is to shift the magnetic poles through three hundred and sixty degrees. It is obvious that if the four reversals in the same order could be produced by each half-revolution of the generator the motor would make two revolutions to the generator's one. This would be readily accomplished by adding two intermediate poles to the generator or altering it in any of the other equivalent ways above indicated. The same rule applies to generators and motors with multiple poles. For instance, if a generator be constructed with two circuits, each of which produces twelve reversals of current to a revolution, and these currents be directed through the independent energizing-coils of a motor, the coils of which are so applied as to produce twelve magnetic poles at all times, the rotation of the two will be synchronous; but if the motor-coils produce but six poles, the movable element will be rotated twice while the generator rotates once; or if the motor have four poles, its rotation will be three times as fast as that of the generator.

Another method related to the same concept allows a single generator to power multiple motors, either at its own speed or at different speeds. This can be achieved by constructing the motors with fewer poles than the generator, which results in the motors running faster than the generator. The speed increases as the number of poles decreases. For example, consider a generator with two independent generating coils that rotate between two oppositely magnetized poles, and a motor with energizing coils that create two magnetic poles at any given time to set the motor in motion. This type of generator produces four reversals, or impulses, in each[Pg 37] revolution—two in each independent circuit—resulting in the motor's magnetic poles shifting a full three hundred and sixty degrees. Clearly, if the four reversals could be generated with each half-revolution of the generator, the motor would complete two revolutions for every one of the generator's rotations. This could easily be achieved by adding two intermediate poles to the generator or by modifying it in other equivalent ways mentioned earlier. The same principle applies to generators and motors with multiple poles. For instance, if a generator has two circuits that produce twelve reversals of current per revolution, and these currents are directed through the independent energizing coils of a motor designed to create twelve magnetic poles at all times, the rotation of both will be in sync. However, if the motor's coils produce only six poles, the motor will rotate twice for every single rotation of the generator; and if the motor has four poles, it will spin three times faster than the generator.

Fig. 28, 29.
Fig. 28.Fig. 29.

These features, so far as necessary to an understanding of the principle, are here illustrated. Fig. 28 is a diagrammatic illustration of a generator constructed in accordance with the invention. Fig. 29 is a similar view of a correspondingly constructed motor. Fig. 30 is a diagram of a generator of modified construction. Fig. 31 is a diagram of a motor of corresponding character. Fig. 32 is a diagram of a system containing a generator and several motors adapted to run at various speeds.[Pg 38]

These features, as far as necessary to understand the principle, are illustrated here. Fig. 28 is a diagram showing a generator built according to the invention. Fig. 29 is a similar view of a motor built in the same way. Fig. 30 is a diagram of a generator with a modified design. Fig. 31 is a diagram of a motor of a similar type. Fig. 32 is a diagram of a system that includes a generator and several motors designed to operate at different speeds.[Pg 38]

In Fig. 28, let C represent a cylindrical armature core wound longitudinally with insulated coils A A, which are connected up in series, the terminals of the series being connected to collecting-rings a a on the shaft G. By means of this shaft the armature is mounted to rotate between the poles of an annular field-magnet D, formed with polar projections wound with coils E, that magnetize the said projections. The coils E are included in the circuit of a generator F, by means of which the field-magnet is energized. If thus constructed, the machine is a well-known form of alternating-current generator. To adapt it to his system, however, Mr. Tesla winds on armature C a second set of coils B B intermediate to the first, or, in other words, in such positions that while the coils of one set are in the relative positions to the poles of the field-magnet to produce the maximum current, those of the other set will be in the position in which they produce the minimum current. The coils B are connected, also, in series and to two connecting-rings, secured generally to the shaft at the opposite end of the armature.

In Fig. 28, let C represent a cylindrical armature core that is wound longitudinally with insulated coils A A, which are connected in series. The terminals of this series are connected to collecting rings a a on the shaft G. The armature rotates between the poles of an annular field magnet D, which is formed with polar projections that are wound with coils E to magnetize those projections. The coils E are part of the circuit of a generator F, which energizes the field magnet. If constructed this way, the machine is a well-known type of alternating current generator. However, to adapt it to his system, Mr. Tesla adds a second set of coils B B on armature C between the first set. In other words, he positions them so that while one set of coils is optimally aligned to the poles of the field magnet to produce maximum current, the other set is in the position to produce minimum current. The coils B are also connected in series and to two connecting rings, usually secured to the shaft at the opposite end of the armature.

Fig. 30. Fig. 30.
Fig. 31. Fig. 31.

The motor shown in Fig. 29 has an annular field-magnet H, with four pole-pieces wound with coils I. The armature is constructed similarly to the generator, but with two sets of two coils in closed circuits to correspond with the reduced number of magnetic poles in the field. From the foregoing it is evident that one revolution of the armature of the generator producing eight current impulses in each circuit will produce two revolutions of the motor-armature.

The motor shown in Fig. 29 has a ring-shaped field magnet H, with four pole pieces wrapped with coils I. The armature is built similarly to the generator, but with two sets of two coils in closed circuits to match the fewer magnetic poles in the field. It’s clear from the above that one complete turn of the generator's armature, which creates eight current pulses in each circuit, will result in two complete turns of the motor's armature.

The application of the principle of this invention is not, however, confined to any particular form of machine. In Figs. 30 and 31 a generator and motor of another well-known type are shown. In Fig. 30, J J are magnets disposed in a circle and wound with coils K, which are in circuit with a generator which[Pg 39] supplies the current that maintains the field of force. In the usual construction of these machines the armature-conductor L is carried by a suitable frame, so as to be rotated in face of the magnets J J, or between these magnets and another similar set in front of them. The magnets are energized so as to be of alternately opposite polarity throughout the series, so that as the conductor C is rotated the current impulses combine or are added to one another, those produced by the conductor in any given position being all in the same direction. To adapt such a machine to his system, Mr. Tesla adds a second set of induced conductors M, in all respects similar to the first, but so placed in reference to it that the currents produced in each will differ by a quarter-phase. With such relations it is evident that as the current decreases in conductor L it increases in conductor M, and conversely, and that any of the forms of Tesla motor invented for use in this system may be operated by such a generator.

The use of this invention's principle isn't limited to any specific type of machine. In Figs. 30 and 31, a generator and motor of another well-known type are illustrated. In Fig. 30, J J are magnets arranged in a circle and wrapped with coils K, which connect to a generator that[Pg 39] supplies the current needed to maintain the magnetic field. Typically, in these machines, the armature-conductor L is mounted on a frame, allowing it to rotate facing the magnets J J, or positioned between these magnets and another similar set in front of them. The magnets are energized to have alternating polarities throughout the series, so when the conductor C rotates, the current impulses combine or add up, with those generated by the conductor in any specific position all moving in the same direction. To integrate such a machine into his system, Mr. Tesla introduces a second set of induced conductors M, which are identical to the first but positioned so that the currents created in each are out of phase by a quarter. With this setup, it’s clear that as the current in conductor L decreases, it increases in conductor M, and vice versa, allowing any of the Tesla motor designs made for this system to be powered by such a generator.

Fig. 31 is intended to show a motor corresponding to the machine in Fig. 30. The construction of the motor is identical with that of the generator, and if coupled thereto it will run synchronously therewith. J' J' are the field-magnets, and K' the coils thereon. L' is one of the armature-conductors and M' the other.

Fig. 31 shows a motor that matches the machine in Fig. 30. The motor’s design is the same as that of the generator, and if connected to it, it will operate in sync. J' J' are the field magnets, and K' are the coils on them. L' is one of the armature conductors, and M' is the other.

Fig. 32 shows in diagram other forms of machine. The generator N in this case is shown as consisting of a stationary ring O, wound with twenty-four coils P P', alternate coils being connected in series in two circuits. Within this ring is a disc or drum Q, with projections Q' wound with energizing-coils included in circuit with a generator R. By driving this disc or cylinder alternating currents are produced in the coils P and P', which are carried off to run the several motors.

Fig. 32 shows a diagram of other types of machines. The generator N in this case is depicted as having a stationary ring O, wound with twenty-four coils P P', where alternate coils are connected in series in two circuits. Inside this ring is a disc or drum Q, with projections Q' wound with energizing coils that are part of a circuit with a generator R. By rotating this disc or cylinder, alternating currents are generated in the coils P and P', which are then used to power the various motors.

The motors are composed of a ring or annular field-magnet S, wound with two sets of energizing-coils T T', and armatures U, having projections U' wound with coils V, all connected in series in a closed circuit or each closed independently on itself.

The motors consist of a ring-shaped or circular field magnet S, surrounded by two sets of energizing coils T T', and armatures U, which have projections U' wrapped with coils V. All of these are connected in series in a closed circuit or each is closed independently on its own.

Suppose the twelve generator-coils P are wound alternately in opposite directions, so that any two adjacent coils of the same set tend to produce a free pole in the ring O between them and the twelve coils P' to be similarly wound. A single revolution of the disc or cylinder Q, the twelve polar projections of which are of opposite polarity, will therefore produce twelve current impulses in each of the circuits W W'. Hence the motor X, which[Pg 40] has sixteen coils or eight free poles, will make one and a half turns to the generator's one. The motor Y, with twelve coils or six poles, will rotate with twice the speed of the generator, and the motor Z, with eight coils or four poles, will revolve three times as fast as the generator. These multipolar motors have a peculiarity which may be often utilized to great advantage. For example, in the motor X, Fig. 32, the eight poles may be either alternately opposite or there may be at any given time alternately two like and two opposite poles. This is readily attained by making the proper electrical connections. The effect of such a change, however, would be the same as reducing the number of [Pg 41]poles one-half, and thereby doubling the speed of any given motor.

Suppose the twelve generator coils P are wound alternately in opposite directions, so that any two adjacent coils of the same set create a free pole in the ring O between them, and the twelve coils P' are wound in a similar way. A single turn of the disc or cylinder Q, which has twelve polar projections of opposite polarity, will produce twelve current impulses in each of the circuits W W'. Thus, the motor X, which[Pg 40] has sixteen coils or eight free poles, will make one and a half turns for each turn of the generator. The motor Y, with twelve coils or six poles, will rotate at twice the speed of the generator, while the motor Z, with eight coils or four poles, will revolve three times faster than the generator. These multipolar motors have a unique feature that can often be used to great advantage. For instance, in the motor X, Fig. 32, the eight poles can either be alternating opposites or can at any time show alternately two like and two opposite poles. This is easily achieved by making the correct electrical connections. However, the effect of such a change would be like reducing the number of [Pg 41] poles by half, effectively doubling the speed of any given motor.

Fig. 32. Fig. 32.

It is obvious that the Tesla electrical transformers which have independent primary currents may be used with the generators described. It may also be stated with respect to the devices we now describe that the most perfect and harmonious action of the generators and motors is obtained when the numbers of the poles of each are even and not odd. If this is not the case, there will be a certain unevenness of action which is the less appreciable as the number of poles is greater; although this may be in a measure corrected by special provisions which it is not here necessary to explain. It also follows, as a matter of course, that if the number of the poles of the motor be greater than that of the generator the motor will revolve at a slower speed than the generator.

It’s clear that Tesla electrical transformers with independent primary currents can be used with the generators we’ve discussed. It’s also worth noting that the best and smoothest performance from both the generators and motors happens when both have an even number of poles, not an odd number. If they don't match this way, there will be some inconsistency in operation, although this becomes less noticeable as the number of poles increases; special adjustments can help correct this, but we don’t need to go into that here. Additionally, it’s obvious that if the motor has more poles than the generator, the motor will run at a slower speed than the generator.

In this chapter, we may include a method devised by Mr. Tesla for avoiding the very high speeds which would be necessary with large generators. In lieu of revolving the generator armature at a high rate of speed, he secures the desired result by a rotation of the magnetic poles of one element of the generator, while driving the other at a different speed. The effect is the same as that yielded by a very high rate of rotation.

In this chapter, we might discuss a method created by Mr. Tesla to avoid the extremely high speeds needed with large generators. Instead of spinning the generator armature quickly, he achieves the desired effect by rotating the magnetic poles of one part of the generator while operating the other at a different speed. The result is the same as what you would get from very high rotation speeds.

In this instance, the generator which supplies the current for operating the motors or transformers consists of a subdivided ring or annular core wound with four diametrically-opposite coils, E E', Fig. 33. Within the ring is mounted a cylindrical armature-core wound longitudinally with two independent coils, F F', the ends of which lead, respectively, to two pairs of insulated contact or collecting rings, D D' G G', on the armature shaft. Collecting brushes d d' g g' bear upon these rings, respectively, and convey the currents through the two independent line-circuits M M'. In the main line there may be included one or more motors or transformers, or both. If motors be used, they are of the usual form of Tesla construction with independent coils or sets of coils J J', included, respectively, in the circuits M M'. These energizing-coils are wound on a ring or annular field or on pole pieces thereon, and produce by the action of the alternating currents passing through them a progressive shifting of the magnetism from pole to pole. The cylindrical armature H of the motor is wound with two coils at right angles, which form independent closed circuits.[Pg 42]

In this case, the generator that provides the electricity to run the motors or transformers consists of a divided ring or annular core wrapped with four opposite coils, E E', Fig. 33. Inside the ring is a cylindrical armature-core wrapped with two separate coils, F F', the ends of which connect to two pairs of insulated contact or collecting rings, D D' G G', on the armature shaft. Collecting brushes d d' g g' rest on these rings and transfer the currents through the two separate line circuits M M'. The main line may include one or more motors or transformers, or both. If motors are used, they are of the standard Tesla design with independent coils or sets of coils J J', connected to the circuits M M'. These energizing coils are wrapped around a ring or annular field or on pole pieces, producing a progressive shift of magnetism from pole to pole due to the alternating currents flowing through them. The cylindrical armature H of the motor has two coils wound at right angles to each other, creating independent closed circuits.[Pg 42]

If transformers be employed, one set of the primary coils, as N N, wound on a ring or annular core is connected to one circuit, as M', and the other primary coils, N N', to the circuit M. The secondary coils K K' may then be utilized for running groups of incandescent lamps P P'.

If transformers are used, one set of primary coils, like N N, wrapped around a ring or annular core is connected to one circuit, such as M', and the other primary coils, N N', to the circuit M. The secondary coils K K' can then be used to power groups of incandescent lamps P P'.

Fig. 33. Fig. 33.

With this generator an exciter is employed. This consists of two poles, A A, of steel permanently magnetized, or of iron excited by a battery or other generator of continuous currents, and a cylindrical armature core mounted on a shaft, B, and wound with two longitudinal coils, C C'. One end of each of these coils is connected to the collecting-rings b c, respectively, while the[Pg 43] other ends are both connected to a ring, a. Collecting-brushes b' c' bear on the rings b c, respectively, and conductors L L convey the currents therefrom through the coils E and E of the generator. L' is a common return-wire to brush a'. Two independent circuits are thus formed, one including coils C of the exciter and E E of the generator, the other coils C' of the exciter and E' E' of the generator. It results from this that the operation of the exciter produces a progressive movement of the magnetic poles of the annular field-core of the generator, the shifting or rotary movement of the poles being synchronous with the rotation of the exciter armature. Considering the operative conditions of a system thus established, it will be found that when the exciter is driven so as to energize the field of the generator, the armature of the latter, if left free to turn, would rotate at a speed practically the same as that of the exciter. If under such conditions the coils F F' of the generator armature be closed upon themselves or short-circuited, no currents, at least theoretically, will be generated in these armature coils. In practice the presence of slight currents is observed, the existence of which is attributable to more or less pronounced fluctuations in the intensity of the magnetic poles of the generator ring. So, if the armature-coils F F' be closed through the motor, the latter will not be turned as long as the movement of the generator armature is synchronous with that of the exciter or of the magnetic poles of its field. If, on the contrary, the speed of the generator armature be in any way checked, so that the shifting or rotation of the poles of the field becomes relatively more rapid, currents will be induced in the armature coils. This obviously follows from the passing of the lines of force across the armature conductors. The greater the speed of rotation of the magnetic poles relatively to that of the armature the more rapidly the currents developed in the coils of the latter will follow one another, and the more rapidly the motor will revolve in response thereto, and this continues until the armature generator is stopped entirely, as by a brake, when the motor, if properly constructed, runs at the speed with which the magnetic poles of the generator rotate.

With this generator, an exciter is used. This consists of two poles, A A, made of permanently magnetized steel or iron that is energized by a battery or another generator of continuous currents, and a cylindrical armature core mounted on a shaft, B, wound with two longitudinal coils, C C'. One end of each coil is connected to the collecting rings b c, while the other ends are both linked to a ring, a. Collecting brushes b' c' make contact with the rings b c, and conductors L L carry the currents from there through the coils E and E of the generator. L' serves as a common return wire to the brush a'. This creates two independent circuits: one includes the coils C of the exciter and E E of the generator, while the other includes the coils C' of the exciter and E' E' of the generator. As a result, the operation of the exciter generates a progressive movement of the magnetic poles of the annular field core of the generator, with the shifting or rotary movement of the poles synchronized with the rotation of the exciter armature. Under these operating conditions, when the exciter is activated to energize the generator's field, if the armature of the generator is free to rotate, it would turn at a speed nearly identical to that of the exciter. If, under such conditions, the coils F F' of the generator armature are closed upon themselves or short-circuited, theoretically no currents will be generated in these armature coils. However, in practice, slight currents are observed, which can be attributed to varying fluctuations in the intensity of the magnetic poles of the generator ring. So, if the armature coils F F' are closed through the motor, it will not turn as long as the movement of the generator armature is synchronized with that of the exciter or the magnetic poles of its field. Conversely, if the speed of the generator armature is slowed down, causing the shifting or rotation of the poles of the field to become relatively faster, currents will be induced in the armature coils. This is due to the lines of force passing across the armature conductors. The greater the speed of rotation of the magnetic poles relative to that of the armature, the faster the currents developed in the armature coils will cycle, causing the motor to spin more rapidly in response. This continues until the armature generator is completely stopped, such as by a brake, at which point the motor, if correctly designed, runs at the speed matching that of the magnetic poles of the generator.

The effective strength of the currents developed in the armature coils of the generator is dependent upon the strength of the currents energizing the generator and upon the number of rotations per unit of time of the magnetic poles of the generator; hence the speed of the motor armature will depend in all cases[Pg 44] upon the relative speeds of the armature of the generator and of its magnetic poles. For example, if the poles are turned two thousand times per unit of time and the armature is turned eight hundred, the motor will turn twelve hundred times, or nearly so. Very slight differences of speed may be indicated by a delicately balanced motor.

The effective strength of the currents generated in the armature coils of the generator relies on the strength of the currents powering the generator and the number of rotations of the generator's magnetic poles per unit of time. Therefore, the speed of the motor armature will always depend on the relative speeds of the generator's armature and its magnetic poles. For instance, if the poles rotate two thousand times per unit of time and the armature rotates eight hundred times, the motor will rotate about twelve hundred times. Very slight differences in speed can be detected by a finely balanced motor.[Pg 44]

Let it now be assumed that power is applied to the generator armature to turn it in a direction opposite to that in which its magnetic poles rotate. In such case the result would be similar to that produced by a generator the armature and field magnets of which are rotated in opposite directions, and by reason of these conditions the motor armature will turn at a rate of speed equal to the sum of the speeds of the armature and magnetic poles of the generator, so that a comparatively low speed of the generator armature will produce a high speed in the motor.

Let’s assume that power is applied to the generator armature to turn it in the opposite direction to that of its magnetic poles. In this case, the result would be similar to what happens when a generator’s armature and field magnets rotate in opposite directions. Because of these conditions, the motor armature will rotate at a speed equal to the combined speeds of the armature and magnetic poles of the generator. This means that a relatively low speed of the generator armature can create a high speed in the motor.

It will be observed in connection with this system that on diminishing the resistance of the external circuit of the generator armature by checking the speed of the motor or by adding translating devices in multiple arc in the secondary circuit or circuits of the transformer the strength of the current in the armature circuit is greatly increased. This is due to two causes: first, to the great differences in the speeds of the motor and generator, and, secondly, to the fact that the apparatus follows the analogy of a transformer, for, in proportion as the resistance of the armature or secondary circuits is reduced, the strength of the currents in the field or primary circuits of the generator is increased and the currents in the armature are augmented correspondingly. For similar reasons the currents in the armature-coils of the generator increase very rapidly when the speed of the armature is reduced when running in the same direction as the magnetic poles or conversely.

It can be seen with this system that by reducing the resistance of the external circuit of the generator armature—either by slowing down the motor or by adding translating devices in multiple arcs in the secondary circuit or circuits of the transformer—the strength of the current in the armature circuit increases significantly. This happens for two reasons: first, because of the large differences in speeds between the motor and generator, and second, because the setup works like a transformer. As the resistance of the armature or secondary circuits decreases, the strength of the currents in the field or primary circuits of the generator increases, which in turn boosts the currents in the armature. For similar reasons, the currents in the armature coils of the generator also increase quickly when the speed of the armature is reduced while running in the same direction as the magnetic poles or the opposite direction.

It will be understood from the above description that the generator-armature may be run in the direction of the shifting of the magnetic poles, but more rapidly, and that in such case the speed of the motor will be equal to the difference between the two rates.

It can be understood from the description above that the generator armature can run in the direction of the shifting magnetic poles, but at a faster speed, and in that case, the motor's speed will be equal to the difference between the two rates.


CHAPTER VII.

Regulator for AC Motors.

An interesting device for regulating and reversing has been devised by Mr. Tesla for the purpose of varying the speed of polyphase motors. It consists of a form of converter or transformer with one element capable of movement with respect to the other, whereby the inductive relations may be altered, either manually or automatically, for the purpose of varying the strength of the induced current. Mr. Tesla prefers to construct this device in such manner that the induced or secondary element may be movable with respect to the other; and the invention, so far as relates merely to the construction of the device itself, consists, essentially, in the combination, with two opposite magnetic poles, of an armature wound with an insulated coil and mounted on a shaft, whereby it may be turned to the desired extent within the field produced by the poles. The normal position of the core of the secondary element is that in which it most completely closes the magnetic circuit between the poles of the primary element, and in this position its coil is in its most effective position for the inductive action upon it of the primary coils; but by turning the movable core to either side, the induced currents delivered by its coil become weaker until, by a movement of the said core and coil through 90°, there will be no current delivered.

An interesting device for regulating and reversing has been created by Mr. Tesla to change the speed of polyphase motors. It’s a type of converter or transformer where one part can move in relation to the other, allowing the inductive connections to be modified, either manually or automatically, to adjust the strength of the induced current. Mr. Tesla prefers this device to be designed so that the induced or secondary part can move with respect to the other; and the invention, regarding just the design of the device itself, essentially involves combining two opposite magnetic poles with an armature wrapped in an insulated coil, mounted on a shaft, which can be rotated as needed within the field created by the poles. The default position of the core of the secondary part is where it completely closes the magnetic circuit between the primary part’s poles, and in this position, its coil is in the best position for the primary coils to induce current. However, by turning the movable core to either side, the induced currents produced by its coil weaken until, with a rotation of the core and coil by 90°, no current is produced at all.

Fig. 34 is a view in side elevation of the regulator. Fig. 35 is a broken section on line x x of Fig. 34. Fig. 36 is a diagram illustrating the most convenient manner of applying the regulator to ordinary forms of motors, and Fig. 37 is a similar diagram illustrating the application of the device to the Tesla alternating-current motors. The regulator may be constructed in many ways to secure the desired result; but that which is, perhaps, its best form is shown in Figs. 34 and 35.

Fig. 34 shows a side view of the regulator. Fig. 35 is a cutaway section along line x x in Fig. 34. Fig. 36 is a diagram that demonstrates the easiest way to attach the regulator to standard motor designs, while Fig. 37 is a similar diagram showing how to apply the device to Tesla alternating-current motors. The regulator can be built in various ways to achieve the desired outcome; however, its best design is likely depicted in Figs. 34 and 35.

A represents a frame of iron. B B are the cores of the induc[Pg 46]ing or primary coils C C. D is a shaft mounted on the side bars, D', and on which is secured a sectional iron core, E, wound with an induced or secondary coil, F, the convolutions of which are parallel with the axis of the shaft. The ends of the core are rounded off so as to fit closely in the space between the two poles and permit the core E to be turned to and held at any desired point. A handle, G, secured to the projecting end of the shaft D, is provided for this purpose.

A represents a metal frame. B B are the cores of the inducing or primary coils C C. D is a shaft attached to the side bars, D', and onto which a sectional iron core, E, is secured, wrapped with an induced or secondary coil, F, the windings of which are parallel to the axis of the shaft. The ends of the core are shaped to fit snugly in the space between the two poles and allow the core E to be rotated and held at any desired position. A handle, G, attached to the protruding end of the shaft D, is provided for this purpose.

Fig. 34. Fig. 34.
Fig. 35. Fig. 35.

In Fig. 36 let H represent an ordinary alternating current generator, the field-magnets of which are excited by a suitable source of current, I. Let J designate an ordinary form of electromagnetic motor provided with an armature, K, commutator L, and field-magnets M. It is well known that such a motor, if its field-magnet cores be divided up into insulated sections, may be practically operated by an alternating current; but in using this regulator with such a motor, Mr. Tesla includes one element of the motor only—say the armature-coils—in the main circuit of the generator, making the connections through the brushes and the commutator in the usual way. He also includes one of the elements of the regulator—say the stationary coils—in the same circuit, and in the circuit with the secondary or movable coil of the regulator he connects up the field-coils of the motor. He also prefers to use flexible conductors to make the connections from the secondary coil of the regulator, as he thereby avoids the use of sliding contacts or rings without interfering with the requisite movement of the core E.[Pg 47]

In Fig. 36, let H represent a standard alternating current generator, with the field magnets powered by a suitable current source, I. Let J represent a typical electromagnetic motor that includes an armature, K, a commutator L, and field magnets M. It's well known that this type of motor, if its field magnet cores are divided into insulated sections, can be effectively operated by an alternating current. However, when using this regulator with such a motor, Mr. Tesla connects only one element of the motor—like the armature coils—to the main circuit of the generator, making the connections through the brushes and the commutator as usual. He also includes one component of the regulator—like the stationary coils—in the same circuit, while connecting the field coils of the motor to the circuit with the secondary or movable coil of the regulator. He prefers to use flexible conductors to connect from the secondary coil of the regulator to avoid using sliding contacts or rings, enabling the necessary movement of the core E.[Pg 47]

If the regulator be in its normal position, or that in which its magnetic circuit is most nearly closed, it delivers its maximum induced current, the phases of which so correspond with those of the primary current that the motor will run as though both field and armature were excited by the main current.

If the regulator is in its normal position, or the one where its magnetic circuit is almost fully closed, it produces its maximum induced current. The phases of this current align so closely with those of the primary current that the motor operates as if both the field and armature were powered by the main current.

Fig. 36. Fig. 36.

To vary the speed of the motor to any rate between the minimum and maximum rates, the core E and coils F are turned in either direction to an extent which produces the desired result, for in its normal position the convolutions of coil F embrace the maximum number of lines of force, all of which act with the same effect upon the coil; hence it will deliver its maximum current; but by turning the coil F out of its position of maximum effect the number of lines of force embraced by it is diminished. The inductive effect is therefore impaired, and the current delivered by coil F will continue to diminish in proportion to the angle at which the coil F is turned until, after passing through an angle of ninety degrees, the convolutions of the coil will be at right angles to those of coils C C, and the inductive effect reduced to a minimum.

To change the speed of the motor to any level between the minimum and maximum speeds, the core E and coils F are turned in either direction as needed to achieve the desired outcome. In its normal position, the loops of coil F capture the maximum number of lines of force, which all have the same effect on the coil; therefore, it delivers its maximum current. However, when coil F is turned away from its maximum effect position, the number of lines of force it captures is reduced. This weakens the inductive effect, and the current delivered by coil F will continue to decrease in relation to the angle at which coil F is turned. After turning through an angle of ninety degrees, the loops of the coil will be perpendicular to those of coils C C, and the inductive effect will be minimized.

Incidentally to certain constructions, other causes may influence the variation in the strength of the induced currents. For example, in the present case it will be observed that by the first movement of coil F a certain portion of its convolutions are carried beyond the line of the direct influence of the lines of force, and that the magnetic path or circuit for the lines is impaired; hence the inductive effect would be reduced. Next, that after moving through a certain angle, which is obviously determined by the relative dimensions of the bobbin or coil F, diagonally opposite portions of the coil will be simultaneously included in the field, but in such positions that the lines which produce a current-impulse in one portion of the coil in a certain direction will pro[Pg 48]duce in the diagonally opposite portion a corresponding impulse in the opposite direction; hence portions of the current will neutralize one another.

Alongside certain constructions, other factors can affect the variation in the strength of the induced currents. For example, in this case, it can be seen that with the initial movement of coil F, some of its turns are moved out of the direct influence of the lines of force, which weakens the magnetic circuit for those lines; therefore, the inductive effect would drop. Then, after rotating through a specific angle, which is clearly determined by the relative sizes of the bobbin or coil F, opposite sections of the coil will be included in the field at the same time, but in such positions that the lines causing a current-impulse in one part of the coil in a certain direction will produce a corresponding impulse in the opposite direction in the diagonally opposite part; hence, parts of the current will cancel each other out.

As before stated, the mechanical construction of the device may be greatly varied; but the essential conditions of the principle will be fulfilled in any apparatus in which the movement of the elements with respect to one another effects the same results by varying the inductive relations of the two elements in a manner similar to that described.

As mentioned earlier, the mechanical setup of the device can vary widely; however, the key requirements of the principle will be met in any system where the movement of the components in relation to each other produces the same outcomes by altering the inductive relationships of the two elements in a way similar to what has been described.

Fig. 37. Fig. 37.

It may also be stated that the core E is not indispensable to the operation of the regulator; but its presence is obviously beneficial. This regulator, however, has another valuable property in its capability of reversing the motor, for if the coil F be turned through a half-revolution, the position of its convolutions relatively to the two coils C C and to the lines of force is reversed, and consequently the phases of the current will be reversed. This will produce a rotation of the motor in an opposite direction. This form of regulator is also applied with great advantage to Mr. Tesla's system of utilizing alternating currents, in which the magnetic poles of the field of a motor are progressively shifted by means of the combined effects upon the field of magnetizing coils included in independent circuits, through which pass alternating currents in proper order and relations to each other.

It can also be said that the core E isn't essential for the regulator to work, but having it definitely helps. This regulator has another useful feature: it can reverse the motor. If the coil F is rotated halfway, the position of its windings relative to the two coils C C and the lines of force is flipped, which in turn reverses the phases of the current. This causes the motor to rotate in the opposite direction. This type of regulator is also very beneficial for Mr. Tesla's system of using alternating currents, where the magnetic poles of the motor's field are shifted progressively through the combined effects on the field of magnetizing coils in separate circuits that carry alternating currents in the right sequence and relationship to each other.

In Fig. 37, let P represent a Tesla generator having two independent coils, P' and P'', on the armature, and T a diagram of a[Pg 49] motor having two independent energizing coils or sets of coils, R R'. One of the circuits from the generator, as S' S', includes one set, R' R', of the energizing coils of the motor, while the other circuit, as S S, includes the primary coils of the regulator. The secondary coil of the regulator includes the other coils, R R, of the motor.

In Fig. 37, let P represent a Tesla generator with two independent coils, P' and P'', on the armature, and T a diagram of a [Pg 49] motor having two independent energizing coils or sets of coils, R R'. One of the circuits from the generator, labeled S' S', connects to one set, R' R', of the motor's energizing coils, while the other circuit, S S, connects to the primary coils of the regulator. The secondary coil of the regulator includes the other coils, R R, of the motor.

While the secondary coil of the regulator is in its normal position, it produces its maximum current, and the maximum rotary effect is imparted to the motor; but this effect will be diminished in proportion to the angle at which the coil F of the regulator is turned. The motor will also be reversed by reversing the position of the coil with reference to the coils C C, and thereby reversing the phases of the current produced by the generator. This changes the direction of the movement of the shifting poles which the armature follows.

While the secondary coil of the regulator is in its usual position, it generates its peak current, and the maximum rotational effect is transferred to the motor. However, this effect will decrease based on the angle at which the coil F of the regulator is rotated. The motor will also run in reverse by changing the position of the coil in relation to the coils C C, which reverses the phases of the current generated by the generator. This alters the direction of movement of the shifting poles that the armature follows.

One of the main advantages of this plan of regulation is its economy of power. When the induced coil is generating its maximum current, the maximum amount of energy in the primary coils is absorbed; but as the induced coil is turned from its normal position the self-induction of the primary-coils reduces the expenditure of energy and saves power.

One of the key benefits of this regulation plan is its energy efficiency. When the induced coil is producing its highest current, the primary coils absorb the most energy. However, as the induced coil is moved from its standard position, the self-induction of the primary coils decreases energy consumption and conserves power.

It is obvious that in practice either coils C C or coil F may be used as primary or secondary, and it is well understood that their relative proportions may be varied to produce any desired difference or similarity in the inducing and induced currents.

It’s clear that in practice either coils C C or coil F can be used as primary or secondary, and it’s well known that their relative sizes can be adjusted to create any desired difference or similarity in the inducing and induced currents.


CHAPTER VIII.

Single Circuit, Self-Starting Sync Motors.

In the first chapters of this section we have, bearing in mind the broad underlying principle, considered a distinct class of motors, namely, such as require for their operation a special generator capable of yielding currents of differing phase. As a matter of course, Mr. Tesla recognizing the desirability of utilizing his motors in connection with ordinary systems of distribution, addressed himself to the task of inventing various methods and ways of achieving this object. In the succeeding chapters, therefore, we witness the evolution of a number of ideas bearing upon this important branch of work. It must be obvious to a careful reader, from a number of hints encountered here and there, that even the inventions described in these chapters to follow do not represent the full scope of the work done in these lines. They might, indeed, be regarded as exemplifications.

In the first chapters of this section, we have considered a specific type of motors, keeping in mind the broader principle that they require a special generator to operate, which can provide currents with different phases. Naturally, Mr. Tesla, understanding the importance of using his motors alongside regular distribution systems, focused on inventing various methods to achieve this goal. Therefore, in the following chapters, we see the development of several ideas related to this crucial area of work. It should be clear to a careful reader, from various hints found throughout, that the inventions discussed in the upcoming chapters do not represent the entire scope of the work done in this field. They could, in fact, be seen as examples.

We will present these various inventions in the order which to us appears the most helpful to an understanding of the subject by the majority of readers. It will be naturally perceived that in offering a series of ideas of this nature, wherein some of the steps or links are missing, the descriptions are not altogether sequential; but any one who follows carefully the main drift of the thoughts now brought together will find that a satisfactory comprehension of the principles can be gained.

We will present these different inventions in the order that seems most helpful for most readers to understand the topic. It's important to note that since we’re sharing a series of ideas where some steps or links may be missing, the descriptions might not be entirely in sequence. However, anyone who carefully follows the main ideas we’ve laid out will find they can achieve a clear understanding of the principles involved.

As is well known, certain forms of alternating-current machines have the property, when connected in circuit with an alternating current generator, of running as a motor in synchronism therewith; but, while the alternating current will run the motor after it has attained a rate of speed synchronous with that of the generator, it will not start it. Hence, in all instances heretofore where these "synchronizing motors," as they are termed, have been run, some means have been adopted to bring the motors up to synchronism with the generator, or approximately so, before the alternating current of the generator is applied to drive them.[Pg 51] In some instances mechanical appliances have been utilized for this purpose. In others special and complicated forms of motor have been constructed. Mr. Tesla has discovered a much more simple method or plan of operating synchronizing motors, which requires practically no other apparatus than the motor itself. In other words, by a certain change in the circuit connections of the motor he converts it at will from a double circuit motor, or such as have been already described, and which will start under the action of an alternating current, into a synchronizing motor, or one which will be run by the generator only when it has reached a certain speed of rotation synchronous with that of the generator. In this manner he is enabled to extend very greatly the applications of his system and to secure all the advantages of both forms of alternating current motor.

As is well known, certain types of alternating-current machines can operate as motors in sync with an alternating current generator when connected to it. However, while the alternating current can keep the motor running once it has reached a speed that matches the generator, it won't start the motor. Therefore, in all previous cases where these "synchronizing motors" have been used, some method has been implemented to bring the motors up to sync with the generator, or at least close to it, before the generator's alternating current is applied to drive them.[Pg 51] In some cases, mechanical devices have been used for this purpose. In others, special and complicated types of motors have been created. Mr. Tesla has found a much simpler method for operating synchronizing motors that requires almost no additional equipment beyond the motor itself. Essentially, by changing the circuit connections of the motor, he can switch it at will from a double circuit motor, which can start under the influence of an alternating current, to a synchronizing motor, which will be driven by the generator only when it reaches a specific speed that matches the generator's rotation. This way, he can greatly expand the applications of his system and take advantage of both types of alternating current motors.

The expression "synchronous with that of the generator," is used here in its ordinary acceptation—that is to say, a motor is said to synchronize with the generator when it preserves a certain relative speed determined by its number of poles and the number of alternations produced per revolution of the generator. Its actual speed, therefore, may be faster or slower than that of the generator; but it is said to be synchronous so long as it preserves the same relative speed.

The phrase "synchronous with that of the generator" is used here in its usual sense—meaning a motor is considered to synchronize with the generator when it maintains a specific relative speed based on its number of poles and the number of cycles produced per revolution of the generator. Its actual speed can be either faster or slower than the generator's; however, it is referred to as synchronous as long as it keeps the same relative speed.

In carrying out this invention Mr. Tesla constructs a motor which has a strong tendency to synchronism with the generator. The construction preferred is that in which the armature is provided with polar projections. The field-magnets are wound with two sets of coils, the terminals of which are connected to a switch mechanism, by means of which the line-current may be carried directly through these coils or indirectly through paths by which its phases are modified. To start such a motor, the switch is turned on to a set of contacts which includes in one motor circuit a dead resistance, in the other an inductive resistance, and, the two circuits being in derivation, it is obvious that the difference in phase of the current in such circuits will set up a rotation of the motor. When the speed of the motor has thus been brought to the desired rate the switch is shifted to throw the main current directly through the motor-circuits, and although the currents in both circuits will now be of the same phase the motor will continue to revolve, becoming a true synchronous motor. To secure greater efficiency, the armature or its polar projections are wound with coils closed on themselves.[Pg 52]

In implementing this invention, Mr. Tesla builds a motor that strongly tends to synchronize with the generator. The preferred design features an armature with polar projections. The field magnets are wound with two sets of coils, and the terminals are connected to a switching mechanism that allows the line current to flow directly through these coils or indirectly through paths that modify its phases. To start this motor, the switch is turned on to a set of contacts that includes a dead resistance in one motor circuit and an inductive resistance in the other. Since the two circuits are parallel, it's clear that the difference in phase between the currents in these circuits will create rotation in the motor. Once the motor speed reaches the desired level, the switch is moved to connect the main current directly through the motor circuits. Even though the currents in both circuits are now in phase, the motor will keep spinning and become a true synchronous motor. To enhance efficiency, the armature or its polar projections have coils that are closed on themselves.[Pg 52]

In the accompanying diagrams, Fig. 38 illustrates the details of the plan above set forth, and Figs. 39 and 40 modifications of the same.

In the accompanying diagrams, Fig. 38 shows the details of the plan mentioned above, and Figs. 39 and 40 show variations of the same.

Fig. 38, 39 and 40. Figs. 38, 39, and 40.

Referring to Fig. 38, let A designate the field-magnets of a motor, the polar projections of which are wound with coils B C included in independent circuits, and D the armature with polar projections wound with coils E closed upon themselves, the motor in these respects being similar in construction to those[Pg 53] described already, but having on account of the polar projections on the armature core, or other similar and well-known features, the properties of a synchronizing-motor. L L' represents the conductors of a line from an alternating current generator G.

Referring to Fig. 38, let A represent the field magnets of a motor, with polar projections that are wrapped with coils B C within separate circuits. Let D denote the armature, which features polar projections wrapped with coils E that are looped back on themselves. In these ways, the motor is similar in design to those[Pg 53] previously described, but due to the polar projections on the armature core and other familiar features, it has the characteristics of a synchronizing motor. L L' shows the conductors from an alternating current generator G.

Near the motor is placed a switch the action of which is that of the one shown in the diagrams, which is constructed as follows: F F' are two conducting plates or arms, pivoted at their ends and connected by an insulating cross-bar, H, so as to be shifted in parallelism. In the path of the bars F F' is the contact 2, which forms one terminal of the circuit through coils C, and the contact 4, which is one terminal of the circuit through coils B. The opposite end of the wire of coils C is connected to the wire L or bar F', and the corresponding end of coils B is connected to wire L' and bar F; hence if the bars be shifted so as to bear on contacts 2 and 4 both sets of coils B C will be included in the circuit L L' in multiple arc or derivation. In the path of the levers F F' are two other contact terminals, 1 and 3. The contact 1 is connected to contact 2 through an artificial resistance, I, and contact 3 with contact 4 through a self-induction coil, J, so that when the switch levers are shifted upon the points 1 and 3 the circuits of coils B and C will be connected in multiple arc or derivation to the circuit L L', and will include the resistance and self-induction coil respectively. A third position of the switch is that in which the levers F and F' are shifted out of contact with both sets of points. In this case the motor is entirely out of circuit.

Next to the motor is a switch that works like the one shown in the diagrams, which is designed as follows: F F' are two conducting plates or arms, hinged at their ends and connected by an insulating cross-bar, H, allowing them to move in parallel. In the path of the bars F F' is contact 2, which forms one terminal of the circuit through coils C, and contact 4, which is one terminal of the circuit through coils B. The other end of the wire from coils C is connected to wire L or bar F', and the corresponding end of coils B is connected to wire L' and bar F; therefore, if the bars are shifted to touch contacts 2 and 4, both sets of coils B C will be part of the circuit L L' in multiple arcs or derivation. In the path of the levers F F' are two additional contact terminals, 1 and 3. Contact 1 is linked to contact 2 through an artificial resistance, I, and contact 3 is connected to contact 4 through a self-induction coil, J, so that when the switch levers are shifted to points 1 and 3, the circuits of coils B and C will connect in multiple arcs or derivation to the circuit L L', including the resistance and self-induction coil respectively. A third position of the switch is when the levers F and F' are moved out of contact with both sets of points. In this case, the motor is completely disconnected from the circuit.

The purpose and manner of operating the motor by these devices are as follows: The normal position of the switch, the motor being out of circuit, is off the contact points. Assuming the generator to be running, and that it is desired to start the motor, the switch is shifted until its levers rest upon points 1 and 3. The two motor-circuits are thus connected with the generator circuit; but by reason of the presence of the resistance I in one and the self-induction coil J in the other the coincidence of the phases of the current is disturbed sufficiently to produce a progression of the poles, which starts the motor in rotation. When the speed of the motor has run up to synchronism with the generator, or approximately so, the switch is shifted over upon the points 2 and 4, thus cutting out the coils I and J, so that the currents in both circuits have the same phase; but the motor now runs as a synchronous motor.

The purpose and operation of the motor using these devices are as follows: The switch is normally positioned to keep the motor out of the circuit, which means it’s off the contact points. Assuming the generator is running and we want to start the motor, the switch is moved until its levers are resting on points 1 and 3. This connects the two motor circuits to the generator circuit; however, due to the resistance I in one circuit and the self-induction coil J in the other, the phases of the current become misaligned enough to create a rotation of the poles, which starts the motor spinning. Once the motor speed reaches synchronization with the generator, or is close enough, the switch is moved to points 2 and 4, cutting out coils I and J, allowing the currents in both circuits to align in phase; at this point, the motor operates as a synchronous motor.

It will be understood that when brought up to speed the mo[Pg 54]tor will run with only one of the circuits B or C connected with the main or generator circuit, or the two circuits may be connected in series. This latter plan is preferable when a current having a high number of alternations per unit of time is employed to drive the motor. In such case the starting of the motor is more difficult, and the dead and inductive resistances must take up a considerable proportion of the electromotive force of the circuits. Generally the conditions are so adjusted that the electromotive force used in each of the motor circuits is that which is required to operate the motor when its circuits are in series. The plan followed in this case is illustrated in Fig. 39. In this instance the motor has twelve poles and the armature has polar projections D wound with closed coils E. The switch used is of substantially the same construction as that shown in the previous figure. There are, however, five contacts, designated as 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. The motor-circuits B C, which include alternate field-coils, are connected to the terminals in the following order: One end of circuit C is connected to contact 9 and to contact 5 through a dead resistance, I. One terminal of circuit B is connected to contact 7 and to contact 6 through a self-induction coil, J. The opposite terminals of both circuits are connected to contact 8.

It will be understood that when brought up to speed, the mo[Pg 54]tor will operate with only one of the circuits B or C connected to the main or generator circuit, or both circuits may be connected in series. The latter option is preferred when using a current with a high number of alternations per unit of time to drive the motor. In this case, starting the motor is more challenging, and the dead and inductive resistances must account for a significant portion of the electromotive force in the circuits. Generally, the conditions are adjusted so that the electromotive force used in each of the motor circuits is what is needed to operate the motor when its circuits are in series. The approach used in this case is illustrated in Fig. 39. Here, the motor has twelve poles, and the armature has polar projections D wrapped with closed coils E. The switch used is mostly the same as the one shown in the previous figure. However, there are five contacts, designated as 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. The motor circuits B C, which include alternate field coils, are connected to the terminals in the following sequence: One end of circuit C is connected to contact 9 and to contact 5 through a dead resistance, I. One terminal of circuit B is connected to contact 7 and to contact 6 through a self-induction coil, J. The opposite terminals of both circuits are connected to contact 8.

One of the levers, as F, of the switch is made with an extension, f, or otherwise, so as to cover both contacts 5 and 6 when shifted into the position to start the motor. It will be observed that when in this position and with lever F' on contact 8 the current divides between the two circuits B C, which from their difference in electrical character produce a progression of the poles that starts the motor in rotation. When the motor has attained the proper speed, the switch is shifted so that the levers cover the contacts 7 and 9, thereby connecting circuits B and C in series. It is found that by this disposition the motor is maintained in rotation in synchronism with the generator. This principle of operation, which consists in converting by a change of connections or otherwise a double-circuit motor, or one operating by a progressive shifting of the poles, into an ordinary synchronizing motor may be carried out in many other ways. For instance, instead of using the switch shown in the previous figures, we may use a temporary ground circuit between the generator and motor, in order to start the motor, in substantially the manner indicated in Fig. 40. Let G in this figure represent an ordinary[Pg 55] alternating-current generator with, say, two poles, M M', and an armature wound with two coils, N N', at right angles and connected in series. The motor has, for example, four poles wound with coils B C, which are connected in series, and an armature with polar projections D wound with closed coils E E. From the common joint or union between the two circuits of both the generator and the motor an earth connection is established, while the terminals or ends of these circuits are connected to the line. Assuming that the motor is a synchronizing motor or one that has the capability of running in synchronism with the generator, but not of starting, it may be started by the above-described apparatus by closing the ground connection from both generator and motor. The system thus becomes one with a two-circuit generator and motor, the ground forming a common return for the currents in the two circuits L and L'. When by this arrangement of circuits the motor is brought to speed, the ground connection is broken between the motor or generator, or both, ground-switches P P' being employed for this purpose. The motor then runs as a synchronizing motor.

One of the levers, labeled F, of the switch is designed with an extension, f, or something similar, so it can cover both contacts 5 and 6 when it’s moved into the position to start the motor. You’ll notice that when it’s in this position and with lever F' on contact 8, the current splits between the two circuits B C. Their different electrical characteristics create a shift in the poles that starts the motor turning. Once the motor has reached the proper speed, the switch is moved so that the levers cover contacts 7 and 9, which connects circuits B and C in series. This setup ensures that the motor keeps running in sync with the generator. This operation principle, which involves changing connections or other methods to convert a double-circuit motor or one running by shifting poles into a regular synchronizing motor, can be achieved in various ways. For example, instead of using the switch shown in the earlier figures, we can implement a temporary ground circuit between the generator and the motor to start the motor, similar to what is shown in Fig. 40. Let G in this figure represent a regular[Pg 55] alternating-current generator with, say, two poles, M M', and an armature wound with two coils, N N', at right angles and connected in series. The motor, for example, has four poles wound with coils B C, which are connected in series, and an armature with polar projections D wound with closed coils E E. A ground connection is established from the common junction between the two circuits of both the generator and the motor, while the terminals or ends of these circuits are connected to the line. Assuming the motor is a synchronizing motor or one that can run in sync with the generator but cannot start by itself, it can be started using the previously described apparatus by closing the ground connection from both the generator and the motor. The system thus becomes a two-circuit generator and motor, with the ground forming a common return for the currents in the two circuits L and L'. When this circuit arrangement brings the motor up to speed, the ground connection is broken between the motor or generator, or both, utilizing ground-switches P P' for this purpose. The motor then operates as a synchronizing motor.

In describing the main features which constitute this invention illustrations have necessarily been omitted of the appliances used in conjunction with the electrical devices of similar systems—such, for instance, as driving-belts, fixed and loose pulleys for the motor, and the like; but these are matters well understood.

In describing the main features that make up this invention, I've left out illustrations of the tools used alongside the electrical devices in similar systems—like driving belts, fixed and loose pulleys for the motor, and so on; but these are things that are well understood.

Mr. Tesla believes he is the first to operate electro-magnetic motors by alternating currents in any of the ways herein described—that is to say, by producing a progressive movement or rotation of their poles or points of greatest magnetic attraction by the alternating currents until they have reached a given speed, and then by the same currents producing a simple alternation of their poles, or, in other words, by a change in the order or character of the circuit connections to convert a motor operating on one principle to one operating on another.

Mr. Tesla believes he is the first to use electromagnetic motors with alternating currents in the ways described here. This means creating a progressive movement or rotation of their poles— the areas of highest magnetic attraction— through alternating currents until they reach a specific speed. Then, he uses the same currents to produce a simple alternation of their poles. In other words, he changes the order or type of circuit connections to switch a motor that operates on one principle to one that operates on another.


CHAPTER IX.

Switch from Double Current to Single Current Motor.

A description is given elsewhere of a method of operating alternating current motors by first rotating their magnetic poles until they have attained synchronous speed, and then alternating the poles. The motor is thus transformed, by a simple change of circuit connections from one operated by the action of two or more independent energizing currents to one operated either by a single current or by several currents acting as one. Another way of doing this will now be described.

A method for running alternating current motors is explained elsewhere, where the magnetic poles are rotated until they reach synchronous speed, and then the poles are switched. This process changes the motor from being powered by two or more independent energizing currents to being powered either by a single current or by multiple currents acting together. Another approach to achieve this will be described now.

At the start the magnetic poles of one element or field of the motor are progressively shifted by alternating currents differing in phase and passed through independent energizing circuits, and short circuit the coils of the other element. When the motor thus started reaches or passes the limit of speed synchronous with the generator, Mr. Tesla connects up the coils previously short-circuited with a source of direct current and by a change of the circuit connections produces a simple alternation of the poles. The motor then continues to run in synchronism with the generator. The motor here shown in Fig. 41 is one of the ordinary forms, with field-cores either laminated or solid and with a cylindrical laminated armature wound, for example, with the coils A B at right angles. The shaft of the armature carries three collecting or contact rings C D E. (Shown, for better illustration, as of different diameters.)

At the beginning, the magnetic poles of one part of the motor are gradually shifted by alternating currents that are out of phase and run through separate energizing circuits, which short-circuit the coils of the other part. Once the motor starts and reaches or exceeds the speed that syncs with the generator, Mr. Tesla connects the previously short-circuited coils to a direct current source and changes the circuit connections to create a simple alternation of the poles. The motor then continues to operate in sync with the generator. The motor shown in Fig. 41 is one of the standard types, with field cores that are either laminated or solid and features a cylindrical laminated armature wound, for instance, with coils A B positioned at right angles. The armature shaft has three collecting or contact rings C D E. (These are shown, for clarity, as different diameters.)

One end of coil A connects to one ring, as C, and one end of coil B connects with ring D. The remaining ends are connected to ring E. Collecting springs or brushes F G H bear upon the rings and lead to the contacts of a switch, to be presently described. The field-coils have their terminals in binding-posts K K, and may be either closed upon themselves or connected with a source of direct current L, by means of a switch M. The main or controlling switch has five contacts a b c d e and two levers f g, pivoted and connected by an insulating cross-bar h, so as to move in parallelism. These levers are connected to the line[Pg 57] wires from a source of alternating currents N. Contact a is connected to brush G and coil B through a dead resistance R and wire P. Contact b is connected with brush F and coil A through a self-induction coil S and wire O. Contacts c and e are connected to brushes G F, respectively, through the wires P O, and contact d is directly connected with brush H. The lever f has a widened end, which may span the contacts a b. When in such position and with lever g on contact d, the alternating currents divide between the two motor-coils, and by reason of their different self-induction a difference of current-phase is obtained that starts the motor in rotation. In starting, the field-coils are short circuited.

One end of coil A connects to ring C, and one end of coil B connects to ring D. The other ends are connected to ring E. The collecting springs or brushes F G H press against the rings and lead to the contacts of a switch, which will be described shortly. The field coils have their terminals at binding posts K K and can either be closed in a loop or connected to a direct current source L via a switch M. The main or controlling switch has five contacts a b c d e and two levers f g, which are pivoted and linked by an insulating cross-bar h, allowing them to move in unison. These levers are connected to the line[Pg 57] wires from a source of alternating currents N. Contact a is linked to brush G and coil B through a dead resistance R and wire P. Contact b is connected to brush F and coil A through a self-induction coil S and wire O. Contacts c and e are linked to brushes G F, respectively, through wires P O, and contact d is directly connected to brush H. The lever f has a widened end that can cover contacts a b. When in this position and with lever g on contact d, the alternating currents are split between the two motor coils, and because of their different self-induction, a difference in current phase is created that starts the motor rotating. During startup, the field coils are short-circuited.

Fig. 41. Fig. 41.

When the motor has attained the desired speed, the switch is shifted to the position shown in dotted lines—that is to say, with the levers f g resting on points c e. This connects up the two armature coils in series, and the motor will then run as a synchronous motor. The field-coils are thrown into circuit with the direct current source when the main switch is shifted.

When the motor has reached the desired speed, the switch is moved to the position indicated by the dotted lines—that is, with the levers f g resting on points c e. This connects the two armature coils in series, and the motor will then operate as a synchronous motor. The field coils are connected to the direct current source when the main switch is flipped.


CHAPTER X.

Motor with "Current Lag" Artificially Secured.

One of the general ways followed by Mr. Tesla in developing his rotary phase motors is to produce practically independent currents differing primarily in phase and to pass these through the motor-circuits. Another way is to produce a single alternating current, to divide it between the motor-circuits, and to effect artificially a lag in one of these circuits or branches, as by giving to the circuits different self-inductive capacity, and in other ways. In the former case, in which the necessary difference of phase is primarily effected in the generation of currents, in some instances, the currents are passed through the energizing coils of both elements of the motor—the field and armature; but a further result or modification may be obtained by doing this under the conditions hereinafter specified in the case of motors in which the lag, as above stated, is artificially secured.

One of the main methods Mr. Tesla uses to develop his rotary phase motors is to create nearly independent currents that mainly differ in phase and run them through the motor circuits. Another method involves generating a single alternating current, splitting it between the motor circuits, and artificially creating a delay in one of these circuits or branches, such as by giving the circuits different self-inductive capacities, among other techniques. In the first case, where the necessary phase difference is primarily achieved during current generation, sometimes the currents are sent through the energizing coils of both parts of the motor—the field and armature; however, a further result or adjustment can be achieved by doing this under the conditions specified later for motors where the lag, as mentioned, is artificially created.

Figs. 42 to 47, inclusive, are diagrams of different ways in which the invention is carried out; and Fig. 48, a side view of a form of motor used by Mr. Tesla for this purpose.

Figs. 42 to 47 show different diagrams of how the invention is implemented, and Fig. 48 provides a side view of a type of motor used by Mr. Tesla for this purpose.

Figs. 42, 43 and 44. Figs. 42, 43, and 44.

A B in Fig. 42 indicate the two energizing circuits of a motor, and C D two circuits on the armature. Circuit or coil A is connected in series with circuit or coil C, and the two circuits B D are similarly connected. Between coils A and C is a contact-ring e, forming one terminal of the latter, and a brush a, forming one terminal of the former. A ring d and brush c similarly connect coils B and D. The opposite terminals of the field-coils connect to one binding post h of the motor, and those of the armature coils are similarly connected to the opposite binding post i through a contact-ring f and brush g. Thus each motor-circuit while in derivation to the other includes one armature and one field coil. These circuits are of different self-induction, and may be made so in various ways. For the sake of clearness, an artificial resistance R is shown in one of these circuits, and in the other a self-induction coil S. When an alternating current is passed [Pg 59]through this motor it divides between its two energizing-circuits. The higher self-induction of one circuit produces a greater retardation or lag in the current therein than in the other. The difference of phase between the two currents effects the rotation or shifting of the points of maximum magnetic effect that secures the rotation of the armature. In certain respects this plan of including both armature and field coils in circuit is a marked improvement. Such a motor has a good torque at starting; yet it has also considerable tendency to synchronism, owing to the fact[Pg 60] that when properly constructed the maximum magnetic effects in both armature and field coincide—a condition which in the usual construction of these motors with closed armature coils is not readily attained. The motor thus constructed exhibits too, a better regulation of current from no load to load, and there is less difference between the apparent and real energy expended in running it. The true synchronous speed of this form of motor is that of the generator when both are alike—that is to say, if the number of the coils on the armature and on the field is x, the motor will run normally at the same speed as a generator driving it if the number of field magnets or poles of the same be also x.

A B in Fig. 42 show the two power circuits of a motor, and C D show two circuits on the armature. Coil A is connected in series with coil C, and the two circuits B D are connected similarly. Between coils A and C is a contact ring e, forming one terminal of the latter, and a brush a, forming one terminal of the former. A ring d and brush c similarly connect coils B and D. The opposite terminals of the field coils connect to one binding post h of the motor, and those of the armature coils connect to the opposite binding post i through a contact ring f and brush g. This means each motor circuit, while connected to the other, includes one armature and one field coil. These circuits have different self-induction and can be arranged in various ways. To clarify, an artificial resistance R is shown in one of these circuits, while the other has a self-induction coil S. When an alternating current is passed [Pg 59]through this motor, it splits between its two power circuits. The higher self-induction of one circuit creates more lag in that circuit compared to the other. The phase difference between the two currents causes the rotation or movement of the points of maximum magnetic effect, which secures the rotation of the armature. In some ways, this method of including both armature and field coils in the circuit is a significant improvement. Such a motor has good starting torque; however, it still tends to synchronize well due to the fact[Pg 60] that when properly built, the maximum magnetic effects in both the armature and field align—a state that’s not usually achieved in standard designs with closed armature coils. The motor also shows better current regulation from no load to load, and there's less difference between the apparent and actual energy used while operating it. The true synchronous speed of this type of motor matches that of the generator when both are identical—that is, if the number of coils on the armature and on the field is x, the motor will run normally at the same speed as a generator driving it if the number of field magnets or poles is also x.

Figs. 45, 46 and 47. Figs 45-47.

Fig. 43 shows a somewhat modified arrangement of circuits. There is in this case but one armature coil E, the winding of which maintains effects corresponding to the resultant poles produced by the two field-circuits.

Fig. 43 shows a slightly changed setup of circuits. In this case, there is only one armature coil E, the winding of which generates effects that correspond to the resulting poles created by the two field circuits.

Fig. 44 represents a disposition in which both armature and field are wound with two sets of coils, all in multiple arc to the line or main circuit. The armature coils are wound to correspond with the field-coils with respect to their self-induction. A modification of this plan is shown in Fig. 45—that is to say, the[Pg 61] two field coils and two armature coils are in derivation to themselves and in series with one another. The armature coils in this case, as in the previous figure, are wound for different self-induction to correspond with the field coils.

Fig. 44 shows a setup where both the armature and the field are equipped with two sets of coils, all arranged in multiple arcs to connect to the main circuit. The armature coils are designed to match the field coils in terms of their self-induction. A variation of this arrangement is displayed in Fig. 45, which illustrates that the two field coils and two armature coils are connected in parallel to themselves and in series with each other. In this case, similar to the previous figure, the armature coils are wound for different self-induction to match the field coils.

Another modification is shown in Fig. 46. In this case only one armature-coil, as D, is included in the line-circuit, while the other, as C, is short-circuited.

Another modification is shown in Fig. 46. In this case, only one armature coil, labeled D, is included in the line circuit, while the other, labeled C, is short-circuited.

In such a disposition as that shown in Fig. 43, or where only one armature-coil is employed, the torque on the start is somewhat reduced, while the tendency to synchronism is somewhat increased. In such a disposition as shown in Fig. 46, the opposite conditions would exist. In both instances, however, there is the advantage of dispensing with one contact-ring.

In a setup like the one shown in Fig. 43, or when only one armature coil is used, the torque at startup is slightly lower, while the tendency to sync is somewhat higher. In a setup like the one shown in Fig. 46, the opposite conditions would apply. In both cases, though, there's the benefit of using one less contact ring.

Fig. 48. Fig. 48.

In Fig. 46 the two field-coils and the armature-coil D are in multiple arc. In Fig. 47 this disposition is modified, coil D being shown in series with the two field-coils.

In Fig. 46, the two field-coils and the armature-coil D are connected in multiple arcs. In Fig. 47, this setup is changed, with coil D shown in series with the two field-coils.

Fig. 48 is an outline of the general form of motor in which this invention is embodied. The circuit connections between the armature and field coils are made, as indicated in the previous figures, through brushes and rings, which are not shown.

Fig. 48 shows an outline of the general design of the motor where this invention is used. The circuit connections between the armature and field coils are made, as shown in the previous figures, through brushes and rings, which are not depicted.


CHAPTER XI.

Another way to convert from a torque to a synchronizing motor.

In a preceding chapter we have described a method by which Mr. Tesla accomplishes the change in his type of rotating field motor from a torque to a synchronizing motor. As will be observed, the desired end is there reached by a change in the circuit connections at the proper moment. We will now proceed to describe another way of bringing about the same result. The principle involved in this method is as follows:—

In a previous chapter, we explained how Mr. Tesla changes his rotating field motor from a torque motor to a synchronizing motor. As you will see, the desired outcome is achieved by altering the circuit connections at the right moment. We will now describe another way to achieve the same result. The principle behind this method is as follows:—

If an alternating current be passed through the field coils only of a motor having two energizing circuits of different self-induction and the armature coils be short-circuited, the motor will have a strong torque, but little or no tendency to synchronism with the generator; but if the same current which energizes the field be passed also through the armature coils the tendency to remain in synchronism is very considerably increased. This is due to the fact that the maximum magnetic effects produced in the field and armature more nearly coincide. On this principle Mr. Tesla constructs a motor having independent field circuits of different self-induction, which are joined in derivation to a source of alternating currents. The armature is wound with one or more coils, which are connected with the field coils through contact rings and brushes, and around the armature coils a shunt is arranged with means for opening or closing the same. In starting this motor the shunt is closed around the armature coils, which will therefore be in closed circuit. When the current is directed through the motor, it divides between the two circuits, (it is not necessary to consider any case where there are more than two circuits used), which, by reason of their different self-induction, secure a difference of phase between the two currents in the two branches, that produces a shifting or rotation of the poles. By the alternations of current, other currents are induced in the closed—or short-circuited—armature coils and the[Pg 63] motor has a strong torque. When the desired speed is reached, the shunt around the armature-coils is opened and the current directed through both armature and field coils. Under these conditions the motor has a strong tendency to synchronism.

If an alternating current is run through only the field coils of a motor that has two energizing circuits of different self-induction while the armature coils are short-circuited, the motor will generate a strong torque but will have little or no tendency to synchronize with the generator. However, if the same current powering the field also passes through the armature coils, the tendency to stay in sync significantly increases. This is because the maximum magnetic effects created in the field and armature align more closely. Based on this principle, Mr. Tesla designs a motor with independent field circuits of different self-induction, which are connected in parallel to a source of alternating currents. The armature is equipped with one or more coils, which are linked to the field coils through contact rings and brushes, and a shunt is placed around the armature coils with a way to open or close it. When starting this motor, the shunt is closed around the armature coils, creating a closed circuit. When current flows through the motor, it splits between the two circuits (it's unnecessary to consider situations where more than two circuits are involved), which, due to their differing self-induction, creates a phase difference between the two currents in the branches, causing a shifting or rotation of the poles. The alternating current also induces additional currents in the closed— or short-circuited—armature coils, resulting in a strong torque. When the desired speed is reached, the shunt around the armature coils is opened, and the current flows through both the armature and field coils. In these conditions, the motor has a strong tendency to synchronize.

Figs. 49, 50 and 51. Figs. 49, 50, and 51.

In Fig. 49, A and B designate the field coils of the motor. As the circuits including these coils are of different self-induction, this is represented by a resistance coil R in circuit with A, and a self-induction coil S in circuit with B. The same result may of course be secured by the winding of the coils. C is the armature circuit, the terminals of which are rings a b. Brushes c d bear on these rings and connect with the line and field circuits. D is the shunt or short circuit around the armature. E is the switch in the shunt.

In Fig. 49, A and B represent the field coils of the motor. Since the circuits containing these coils have different self-induction, this is shown by a resistance coil R connected with A, and a self-induction coil S connected with B. The same outcome can obviously be achieved by the way the coils are wound. C is the armature circuit, with terminals that are rings a b. Brushes c d press against these rings and connect to the line and field circuits. D is the shunt or bypass around the armature. E is the switch in the shunt.

It will be observed that in such a disposition as is illustrated in[Pg 64] Fig. 49, the field circuits A and B being of different self-induction, there will always be a greater lag of the current in one than the other, and that, generally, the armature phases will not correspond with either, but with the resultant of both. It is therefore important to observe the proper rule in winding the armature. For instance, if the motor have eight poles—four in each circuit—there will be four resultant poles, and hence the armature winding should be such as to produce four poles, in order to constitute a true synchronizing motor.

It can be seen that in the setup shown in[Pg 64] Fig. 49, the field circuits A and B have different self-induction. This means that the current will always lag more in one than the other, and that the armature phases usually won't match either one, but rather with the combined effect of both. Therefore, it's essential to follow the correct guidelines when winding the armature. For example, if the motor has eight poles—four in each circuit—there will be four resultant poles. As a result, the armature winding should be designed to create four poles to ensure it functions as a true synchronizing motor.

Fig. 52. Fig. 52.

The diagram, Fig. 50, differs from the previous one only in respect to the order of connections. In the present case the armature-coil, instead of being in series with the field-coils, is in multiple arc therewith. The armature-winding may be similar to that of the field—that is to say, the armature may have two or more coils wound or adapted for different self-induction and adapted, preferably, to produce the same difference of phase as the field-coils. On starting the motor the shunt is closed around both coils. This is shown in Fig. 51, in which the armature coils are F G. To indicate their different electrical character, there are shown in circuit with them, respectively, the resistance R' and the self-induction coil S'. The two armature coils are in series with the field-coils and the same disposition of the shunt or short-circuit D is used. It is of advantage in the operation of motors of this kind to construct or wind the armature in such manner that when short-circuited on the start it will have a tendency to reach a higher speed than that which synchronizes with the generator. For example, a given motor having, say, eight poles should run, with the armature coil short-circuited, at two thousand revolutions per minute to bring it up to synchronism. It will generally happen, however, that[Pg 65] this speed is not reached, owing to the fact that the armature and field currents do not properly correspond, so that when the current is passed through the armature (the motor not being quite up to synchronism) there is a liability that it will not "hold on," as it is termed. It is preferable, therefore, to so wind or construct the motor that on the start, when the armature coils are short-circuited, the motor will tend to reach a speed higher than the synchronous—as for instance, double the latter. In such case the difficulty above alluded to is not felt, for the motor will always hold up to synchronism if the synchronous speed—in the case supposed of two thousand revolutions—is reached or passed. This may be accomplished in various ways; but for all practical purposes the following will suffice: On the armature are wound two sets of coils. At the start only one of these is short-circuited, thereby producing a number of poles on the armature, which will tend to run the speed up above the synchronous limit. When such limit is reached or passed, the current is directed through the other coil, which, by increasing the number of armature poles, tends to maintain synchronism.

The diagram, Fig. 50, changes from the previous one only in the way the connections are made. Here, the armature coil is not in series with the field coils but is instead connected in parallel with them. The armature winding can be similar to that of the field, meaning the armature may have two or more coils designed for different self-induction and ideally set up to create the same phase difference as the field coils. When starting the motor, the shunt is closed around both coils. This is illustrated in Fig. 51, where the armature coils are F G. To show their different electrical characteristics, resistance R' and the self-induction coil S' are included in the circuit with them. The two armature coils are in series with the field coils, and the same setup for the shunt or short-circuit D is used. It's beneficial for motors like this to be constructed or wound in such a way that when short-circuited at startup, they will tend to reach a speed higher than what's needed for synchronization with the generator. For instance, a motor with eight poles should run at two thousand revolutions per minute when the armature coil is short-circuited to synchronize. However, it often happens that[Pg 65] this speed isn't achieved because the armature and field currents don't align properly, leading to the possibility that the motor won't "hold on" when current passes through the armature and it isn't quite synchronized. Therefore, it's preferable to wind or construct the motor so that at startup, when the armature coils are short-circuited, it tends to exceed the synchronous speed—like, for example, twice that speed. In this way, the previously mentioned issue is avoided, as the motor will stay synchronized if the synchronous speed—in this case, two thousand revolutions—is reached or surpassed. This can be done in several ways, but for practical purposes, the following method will work: the armature has two sets of coils wound onto it. At startup, only one of these coils is short-circuited, creating a number of poles on the armature that help raise the speed above the synchronous limit. Once that limit is reached or exceeded, the current is redirected through the other coil, which increases the number of armature poles and helps maintain synchronism.

Fig. 53. Fig. 53.

In Fig. 52, such a disposition is shown. The motor having, say, eight poles contains two field-circuits A and B, of different self-induction. The armature has two coils F and G. The former is closed upon itself, the latter connected with the field and line through contact-rings a b, brushes c d, and a switch E. On the start the coil F alone is active and the motor tends to run at a speed above the synchronous; but when the coil G is connected to the circuit the number of armature poles is increased, while the motor is made a true synchronous motor. This disposition[Pg 66] has the advantage that the closed armature-circuit imparts to the motor torque when the speed falls off, but at the same time the conditions are such that the motor comes out of synchronism more readily. To increase the tendency to synchronism, two circuits may be used on the armature, one of which is short-circuited on the start and both connected with the external circuit after the synchronous speed is reached or passed. This disposition is shown in Fig. 53. There are three contact-rings a b e and three brushes c d f, which connect the armature circuits with the external circuit. On starting, the switch H is turned to complete the connection between one binding-post P and the field-coils. This short-circuits one of the armature-coils, as G. The other coil F is out of circuit and open. When the motor is up to speed, the switch H is turned back, so that the connection from binding-post P to the field coils is through the coil G, and switch K is closed, thereby including coil F in multiple arc with the field coils. Both armature coils are thus active.

In Fig. 52, we can see this setup. The motor with, say, eight poles has two field circuits A and B, which have different levels of self-induction. The armature includes two coils F and G. The first coil is closed on itself, while the second one is connected to the field and line through contact rings a b, brushes c d, and a switch E. When starting, only coil F is active, causing the motor to run slightly faster than synchronous speed; however, once coil G is connected to the circuit, the number of armature poles increases, making the motor a true synchronous motor. This configuration[Pg 66] has the advantage that the closed armature circuit provides torque to the motor when the speed decreases, but it also means the motor can lose synchronism more easily. To enhance the tendency for synchronism, two circuits can be used on the armature, with one being short-circuited at the start and both connected to the external circuit after reaching or exceeding synchronous speed. This setup is shown in Fig. 53. There are three contact rings a b e and three brushes c d f, which link the armature circuits to the external circuit. When starting, switch H is turned to complete the connection between one binding post P and the field coils. This short-circuits one of the armature coils, like G. The other coil F remains open and out of the circuit. Once the motor is up to speed, switch H is flipped back, allowing the connection from binding post P to the field coils through coil G, and switch K is closed, including coil F in multiple arcs with the field coils. Thus, both armature coils are active.

From the above-described instances it is evident that many other dispositions for carrying out the invention are possible.

From the examples mentioned above, it's clear that there are many other ways to implement the invention.


CHAPTER XII.

"Magnetic Lag" Motor.

The following description deals with another form of motor, namely, depending on "magnetic lag" or hysteresis, its peculiarity being that in it the attractive effects or phases while lagging behind the phases of current which produce them, are manifested simultaneously and not successively. The phenomenon utilized thus at an early stage by Mr. Tesla, was not generally believed in by scientific men, and Prof. Ayrton was probably first to advocate it or to elucidate the reason of its supposed existence.

The following description discusses another type of motor, specifically one that relies on "magnetic lag" or hysteresis. Its unique feature is that the attractive effects or phases lag behind the current phases that produce them, but they manifest simultaneously rather than one after the other. This phenomenon, which Mr. Tesla explored early on, was not widely accepted by scientists, and Prof. Ayrton was likely the first to support it or explain why it was thought to exist.

Fig. 54 is a side view of the motor, in elevation. Fig. 55 is a part-sectional view at right angles to Fig. 54. Fig. 56 is an end view in elevation and part section of a modification, and Fig. 57 is a similar view of another modification.

Fig. 54 is a side view of the motor, in elevation. Fig. 55 is a partially sectional view at right angles to Fig. 54. Fig. 56 is an end view in elevation and partial section of a modification, and Fig. 57 is a similar view of another modification.

In Figs. 54 and 55, A designates a base or stand, and B B the supporting-frame of the motor. Bolted to the supporting-frame are two magnetic cores or pole-pieces C C', of iron or soft steel. These may be subdivided or laminated, in which case hard iron or steel plates or bars should be used, or they should be wound with closed coils. D is a circular disc armature, built up of sections or plates of iron and mounted in the frame between the pole-pieces C C', curved to conform to the circular shape thereof. This disc may be wound with a number of closed coils E. F F are the main energizing coils, supported by the supporting-frame, so as to include within their magnetizing influence both the pole-pieces C C' and the armature D. The pole-pieces C C' project out beyond the coils F F on opposite sides, as indicated in the drawings. If an alternating current be passed through the coils F F, rotation of the armature will be produced, and this rotation is explained by the following apparent action, or mode of operation: An impulse of current in the coils F F establishes two polarities in the motor. The protruding end of pole-piece C, for instance, will be[Pg 68] of one sign, and the corresponding end of pole-piece C' will be of the opposite sign. The armature also exhibits two poles at right angles to the coils F F, like poles to those in the pole-pieces being on the same side of the coils. While the current is flowing there is no appreciable tendency to rotation developed; but after each current impulse ceases or begins to fall, the magnetism in the armature and in the ends of the pole-pieces C C' lags or continues to manifest itself, which produces a rotation of the armature by the repellent force between the more closely approximating points of maximum magnetic effect. This effect is continued by the reversal of current, the polarities of field and armature being simply reversed. One or both of the elements—the armature or field—may be wound with closed induced coils to intensify this effect. Although in the illustrations but one of the fields is shown, each element of the motor really constitutes a field, wound with the closed coils, the currents being induced mainly in those convolutions or coils which are parallel to the coils F F.

In Figs. 54 and 55, A represents a base or stand, and B B refers to the supporting frame of the motor. Attached to the supporting frame are two magnetic cores or pole pieces C C', made of iron or soft steel. These can be subdivided or laminated; if so, hard iron or steel plates or bars should be used, or they could be wrapped with closed coils. D is a circular disc armature, constructed from sections or plates of iron and mounted in the frame between the pole pieces C C', shaped to match the circular design. This disc may be wound with several closed coils E. F F are the main energizing coils, supported by the frame to ensure their magnetizing influence includes both the pole pieces C C' and the armature D. The pole pieces C C' extend beyond the coils F F on opposite sides, as shown in the drawings. When an alternating current flows through the coils F F, the armature will rotate, and this rotation is explained by the following apparent action or mode of operation: an impulse of current in the coils F F creates two polarities in the motor. The protruding end of pole piece C, for example, will be of one sign, while the corresponding end of pole piece C' will be of the opposite sign. The armature also has two poles at right angles to the coils F F, with the same poles as those in the pole pieces being on the same side of the coils. While the current is flowing, there is no significant tendency for the armature to rotate; however, after each current impulse stops or begins to decrease, the magnetism in the armature and in the ends of the pole pieces C C' lags or continues to show itself, which causes the armature to rotate due to the repelling force between the approaching points of maximum magnetic effect. This effect continues with the reversal of current, simply switching the polarities of the field and the armature. One or both elements—the armature or the field—can be wrapped with closed induced coils to enhance this effect. Although only one of the fields is depicted in the illustrations, each part of the motor actually forms a field, wound with closed coils, with currents primarily induced in the loops or coils that are parallel to the coils F F.

Fig. 54, 55.
Fig. 54.Fig. 55.

A modified form of this motor is shown in Fig. 56. In this form G is one of two standards that support the bearings for the armature-shaft. H H are uprights or sides of a frame, preferably magnetic, the ends C C' of which are bent in the manner indicated, to conform to the shape of the armature D and form field-magnet poles. The construction of the armature may be the same as in the previous figure, or it may be simply a magnetic disc or cylinder, as shown, and a coil or coils F F are se[Pg 69]cured in position to surround both the armature and the poles C C'. The armature is detachable from its shaft, the latter being passed through the armature after it has been inserted in position. The operation of this form of motor is the same in principle as that previously described and needs no further explanation.

A modified version of this motor is shown in Fig. 56. In this version, G is one of the two standards that hold the bearings for the armature shaft. H H are the upright sides of a frame, ideally made of magnetic material, with the ends C C' bent as indicated to match the shape of the armature D and create field-magnet poles. The construction of the armature can be the same as in the previous figure, or it can simply be a magnetic disc or cylinder, as shown, and a coil or coils F F are secured in position to surround both the armature and the poles C C'. The armature can be detached from its shaft, which is passed through the armature after it has been positioned. The operation of this type of motor is fundamentally the same as previously described and doesn’t need any further explanation.

Fig. 56. Fig. 56.
Fig. 57. Fig. 57.

One of the most important features in alternating current motors is, however, that they should be adapted to and capable of running efficiently on the alternating circuits in present use, in which almost without exception the generators yield a very high number of alternations. Such a motor, of the type under consideration, Mr. Tesla has designed by a development of the principle of the motor shown in Fig. 56, making a multipolar motor, which is illustrated in Fig. 57. In the construction of this motor he employs an annular magnetic frame J, with inwardly-extending ribs or projections K, the ends of which all bend or turn in one direction and are generally shaped to conform to the curved surface of the armature. Coils F F are wound from one part K to the one next adjacent, the ends or loops of each coil or group of wires being carried over toward the shaft, so as to form U-shaped groups of convolutions at each end of the armature. The pole-pieces C C', being substantially concentric with the armature, form ledges, along which the coils are laid and should project to some extent beyond the the coils, as shown. The cylindrical or drum armature D is of the same construction as in the other motors described, and is mounted to rotate within the annular frame J and between the U-shaped ends or bends of[Pg 70] the coils F. The coils F are connected in multiple or in series with a source of alternating currents, and are so wound that with a current or current impulse of given direction they will make the alternate pole-pieces C of one polarity and the other pole-pieces C' of the opposite polarity. The principle of the operation of this motor is the same as the other above described, for, considering any two pole-pieces C C', a current impulse passing in the coil which bridges them or is wound over both tends to establish polarities in their ends of opposite sign and to set up in the armature core between them a polarity of the same sign as that of the nearest pole-piece C. Upon the fall or cessation of the current impulse that established these polarities the magnetism which lags behind the current phase, and which continues to manifest itself in the polar projections C C' and the armature, produces by repulsion a rotation of the armature. The effect is continued by each reversal of the current. What occurs in the case of one pair of pole-pieces occurs simultaneously in all, so that the tendency to rotation of the armature is measured by the sum of all the forces exerted by the pole-pieces, as above described. In this motor also the magnetic lag or effect is intensified by winding one or both cores with closed induced coils. The armature core is shown as thus wound. When closed coils are used, the cores should be laminated.

One of the key features of alternating current motors is that they need to be designed for and able to operate efficiently on today's alternating circuits, which almost always produce a very high number of alternations. Mr. Tesla has designed a motor of this type based on the principle of the motor shown in Fig. 56, creating a multipolar motor illustrated in Fig. 57. In building this motor, he uses a ring-shaped magnetic frame J, with ribs or projections K that extend inward. The ends of these ribs all curve in one direction and are generally shaped to fit the curved surface of the armature. Coils F F are wound from one part K to the next, with the ends or loops of each coil or group of wires being routed toward the shaft, forming U-shaped groups of loops at each end of the armature. The pole pieces C C' are mostly concentric with the armature, creating ledges where the coils are laid and should extend slightly beyond the coils, as shown. The cylindrical or drum armature D is constructed the same way as in the other motors described and is mounted to rotate within the ring-shaped frame J and between the U-shaped ends of[Pg 70] the coils F. The coils F are connected in parallel or series with a source of alternating currents and are wound so that with a current or current pulse of a specific direction, they create opposite polarities in the alternate pole pieces C and C'. The operation of this motor follows the same principle as the others described above. Considering any two pole pieces C C', a current impulse passing through the coil that connects them or is wound around both tends to create polarities at their ends of opposite signs and generates a polarity in the armature core between them that matches the nearest pole piece C. When the current impulse that established these polarities stops, the magnetism that lags behind the current phase, which continues to show in the polar projections C C' and the armature, causes the armature to rotate due to repulsion. This effect is sustained with each reversal of the current. What happens with one pair of pole pieces occurs simultaneously with all, so the rotation tendency of the armature is determined by the total forces exerted by the pole pieces, as described above. In this motor, the magnetic lag or effect is also boosted by winding one or both cores with closed induced coils. The armature core is depicted as wound this way. When using closed coils, the cores should be laminated.

It is evident that a pulsatory as well as an alternating current might be used to drive or operate the motors above described.

It’s clear that both a pulsating and an alternating current could be used to power or operate the motors mentioned above.

It will be understood that the degree of subdivision, the mass of the iron in the cores, their size and the number of alternations in the current employed to run the motor, must be taken into consideration in order to properly construct this motor. In other words, in all such motors the proper relations between the number of alternations and the mass, size, or quality of the iron must be preserved in order to secure the best results.

It should be understood that the level of subdivision, the amount of iron in the cores, their size, and the number of cycles in the current used to power the motor need to be considered to construct this motor correctly. In other words, for all such motors, the right balance between the number of cycles and the amount, size, or quality of the iron must be maintained to achieve the best results.


CHAPTER XIII.

Method for Obtaining Phase Difference through Magnetic Shielding.

In that class of motors in which two or more sets of energizing magnets are employed, and in which by artificial means a certain interval of time is made to elapse between the respective maximum or minimum periods or phases of their magnetic attraction or effect, the interval or difference in phase between the two sets of magnets is limited in extent. It is desirable, however, for the economical working of such motors that the strength or attraction of one set of magnets should be maximum, at the time when that of the other set is minimum, and conversely; but these conditions have not heretofore been realized except in cases where the two currents have been obtained from independent sources in the same or different machines. Mr. Tesla has therefore devised a motor embodying conditions that approach more nearly the theoretical requirements of perfect working, or in other words, he produces artificially a difference of magnetic phase by means of a current from a single primary source sufficient in extent to meet the requirements of practical and economical working. He employs a motor with two sets of energizing or field magnets, each wound with coils connected with a source of alternating or rapidly-varying currents, but forming two separate paths or circuits. The magnets of one set are protected to a certain extent from the energizing action of the current by means of a magnetic shield or screen interposed between the magnet and its energizing coil. This shield is properly adapted to the conditions of particular cases, so as to shield or protect the main core from magnetization until it has become itself saturated and no longer capable of containing all the lines of force produced by the current. It will be seen that by this means the energizing action begins in the protected set of magnets a certain arbitrarily-determined period of time later than in the other, and that by this means alone or in conjunction with other means or devices[Pg 72] heretofore employed a practical difference of magnetic phase may readily be secured.

In motors that use two or more sets of energizing magnets, and where a specific delay is artificially created between the maximum or minimum periods of their magnetic attraction, the phase difference between the sets of magnets is limited. For the efficient operation of these motors, it's important that one set of magnets reaches maximum strength when the other set is at minimum strength, and vice versa. However, this has only been achieved before when the two currents were sourced from separate machines. Mr. Tesla has designed a motor that comes closer to the ideal operating conditions by artificially creating a magnetic phase difference using a current from a single primary source, adequate for practical and economical functioning. He uses a motor with two sets of energizing or field magnets, each wound with coils connected to a source of alternating or rapidly varying currents, forming two distinct circuits. One set of magnets is somewhat shielded from the energizing current by a magnetic screen placed between the magnet and its coil. This shield is tailored to specific conditions to protect the main core from magnetization until it is saturated and no longer able to contain all the lines of force produced by the current. As a result, the energizing action in the protected set of magnets starts after a predetermined period compared to the other set, enabling a practical magnetic phase difference to be easily achieved, either alone or along with other previously used methods or devices.[Pg 72]

Fig. 58 is a view of a motor, partly in section, with a diagram illustrating the invention. Fig. 59 is a similar view of a modification of the same.

Fig. 58 shows a motor, partially cut away, along with a diagram that represents the invention. Fig. 59 is a comparable view of a variation of the same.

Fig. 58, 59.
Fig. 58.Fig. 59.

In Fig. 58, which exhibits the simplest form of the invention, A A is the field-magnet of a motor, having, say, eight poles or inwardly-projecting cores B and C. The cores B form one set of magnets and are energized by coils D. The cores C, forming the other set are energized by coils E, and the coils are connected, preferably, in series with one another, in two derived or branched circuits, F G, respectively, from a suitable source of current. Each coil E is surrounded by a magnetic shield H, which is preferably composed of an annealed, insulated, or oxidized iron wire wrapped or wound on the coils in the manner indicated so as to form a closed magnetic circuit around the coils and between the same and the magnetic cores C. Between the pole pieces or cores B C is mounted the armature K, which, as is usual in this type of machines, is wound with coils L closed upon themselves. The operation resulting from this disposition is as follows: If a current impulse be directed through the two circuits of the motor, it will quickly energize the cores B, but not so the cores C, for the reason that in passing through the coils E there is encountered the influence of the closed magnetic circuits formed by the shields H. The first effect is to retard effectively the current impulse in circuit G, while at the same time the proportion of current which does pass does not magnetize the cores C, which are shielded or[Pg 73] screened by the shields H. As the increasing electromotive force then urges more current through the coils E, the iron wire H becomes magnetically saturated and incapable of carrying all the lines of force, and hence ceases to protect the cores C, which becomes magnetized, developing their maximum effect after an interval of time subsequent to the similar manifestation of strength in the other set of magnets, the extent of which is arbitrarily determined by the thickness of the shield H, and other well-understood conditions.

In Fig. 58, which shows the simplest version of the invention, A A is the field magnet of a motor, featuring eight poles or inwardly projecting cores B and C. The cores B make up one set of magnets and are powered by coils D. The cores C, which form the other set, are powered by coils E, with the coils ideally connected in series in two derived or branched circuits, F G, from a suitable current source. Each coil E is surrounded by a magnetic shield H, preferably made of annealed, insulated, or oxidized iron wire wrapped around the coils in a way that creates a closed magnetic circuit around the coils and between them and the magnetic cores C. Between the pole pieces or cores B C is the armature K, which, as is typical in these types of machines, is wound with coils L that are closed on themselves. The operation resulting from this setup is as follows: If an electrical impulse is sent through the two circuits of the motor, it will quickly energize the cores B, but not the cores C, because as it passes through the coils E it encounters the influence of the closed magnetic circuits created by the shields H. The first effect is to effectively slow down the current impulse in circuit G, while the amount of current that does flow does not magnetize the cores C, since they are shielded by the shields H. As the increasing electromotive force pushes more current through the coils E, the iron wire H becomes magnetically saturated and unable to carry all the lines of force, thus it stops shielding the cores C, which become magnetized, reaching their maximum effect after a period of time following the similar increase in strength of the other set of magnets, the extent of which is determined by the thickness of the shield H and other well-understood conditions.

From the above it will be seen that the apparatus or device acts in two ways. First, by retarding the current, and, second, by retarding the magnetization of one set of the cores, from which its effectiveness will readily appear.

From the above, it can be seen that the device works in two ways. First, by slowing down the current, and second, by slowing down the magnetization of one set of the cores, which shows its effectiveness clearly.

Many modifications of the principle of this invention are possible. One useful and efficient application of the invention is shown in Fig. 59. In this figure a motor is shown similar in all respects to that above described, except that the iron wire H, which is wrapped around the coils E, is in this case connected in series with the coils D. The iron-wire coils H, are connected and wound, so as to have little or no self-induction, and being added to the resistance of the circuit F, the action of the current in that circuit will be accelerated, while in the other circuit G it will be retarded. The shield H may be made in many forms, as will be understood, and used in different ways, as appears from the foregoing description.

Many variations of the principle of this invention are possible. One practical and effective application of the invention is shown in Fig. 59. In this figure, a motor is displayed that is similar to the one described above, except that the iron wire H, which is wrapped around the coils E, is connected in series with the coils D. The iron-wire coils H are arranged and wound to minimize or eliminate self-induction, and by adding to the resistance of the circuit F, the current in that circuit will accelerate, while in the other circuit G, it will be slowed down. The shield H can be made in various shapes and used in different ways, as described earlier.

As a modification of his type of motor with "shielded" fields, Mr. Tesla has constructed a motor with a field-magnet having two sets of poles or inwardly-projecting cores and placed side by side, so as practically to form two fields of force and alternately disposed—that is to say, with the poles of one set or field opposite the spaces between the other. He then connects the free ends of one set of poles by means of laminated iron bands or bridge-pieces of considerably smaller cross-section than the cores themselves, whereby the cores will all form parts of complete magnetic circuits. When the coils on each set of magnets are connected in multiple circuits or branches from a source of alternating currents, electromotive forces are set up in or impressed upon each circuit simultaneously; but the coils on the magnetically bridged or shunted cores will have, by reason of the closed magnetic circuits, a high self-induction, which retards the current, permitting at the beginning of each impulse but lit[Pg 74]tle current to pass. On the other hand, no such opposition being encountered in the other set of coils, the current passes freely through them, magnetizing the poles on which they are wound. As soon, however, as the laminated bridges become saturated and incapable of carrying all the lines of force which the rising electromotive force, and consequently increased current, produce, free poles are developed at the ends of the cores, which, acting in conjunction with the others, produce rotation of the armature.

As an update to his design of a motor with "shielded" fields, Mr. Tesla has created a motor that features a field magnet with two sets of poles or inwardly projecting cores positioned side by side, effectively creating two fields of force that alternate. This means the poles of one set face the gaps between the other set. He then connects the free ends of one set of poles with laminated iron bands or bridge pieces that have a much smaller cross-section compared to the cores themselves, allowing all the cores to form parts of complete magnetic circuits. When the coils on each set of magnets are linked in multiple circuits or branches from a source of alternating currents, electromotive forces are generated in or applied to each circuit at the same time; however, the coils on the magnetically bridged or shunted cores will exhibit high self-induction due to the closed magnetic circuits, which slows down the current, allowing only a small amount to pass at the start of each impulse. Meanwhile, the other set of coils faces no such resistance, allowing current to flow freely through them, which magnetizes the poles around which they are wound. As soon as the laminated bridges become saturated and can no longer carry all the magnetic lines of force generated by the rising electromotive force, and thus the increased current, free poles appear at the ends of the cores, which work together with the others to create rotation of the armature.

The construction in detail by which this invention is illustrated is shown in the accompanying drawings.

The detailed construction of this invention is shown in the accompanying drawings.

Fig. 60, 61.
Fig. 60.Fig. 61.

Fig. 60 is a view in side elevation of a motor embodying the principle. Fig. 61 is a vertical cross-section of the motor. A is the frame of the motor, which should be built up of sheets of iron punched out to the desired shape and bolted together with insulation between the sheets. When complete, the frame makes a field-magnet with inwardly projecting pole-pieces B and C. To adapt them to the requirements of this particular case these pole-pieces are out of line with one another, those marked B surrounding one end of the armature and the others, as C, the opposite end, and they are disposed alternately—that is to say, the pole-pieces of one set occur in line with the spaces between those of the other sets.

Fig. 60 shows a side view of a motor that uses this principle. Fig. 61 is a vertical cross-section of the motor. A is the motor's frame, which should be made from sheets of iron cut to the desired shape and bolted together with insulation between the sheets. When finished, the frame forms a field magnet with pole pieces that project inward, labeled B and C. To meet the specific needs of this design, these pole pieces are misaligned; the ones marked B surround one end of the armature, while C surrounds the opposite end, and they are arranged alternately—meaning that the pole pieces of one set line up with the gaps between those of the other sets.

The armature D is of cylindrical form, and is also laminated in the usual way and is wound longitudinally with coils closed upon themselves. The pole-pieces C are connected or shunted by bridge-pieces E. These may be made independently and attached to the pole-pieces, or they may be parts of the forms or blanks stamped or punched out of sheet-iron. Their size or mass is de[Pg 75]termined by various conditions, such as the strength of the current to be employed, the mass or size of the cores to which they are applied, and other familiar conditions.

The armature D is cylindrical and laminated in the usual way, with coils wound longitudinally that close upon themselves. The pole pieces C are connected or shunted by bridge pieces E. These can be made separately and attached to the pole pieces, or they can be parts of forms or blanks stamped or punched out of sheet iron. Their size or mass is determined by various factors, such as the strength of the current being used, the mass or size of the cores they are applied to, and other common conditions.

Coils F surround the pole-pieces B, and other coils G are wound on the pole-pieces C. These coils are connected in series in two circuits, which are branches of a circuit from a generator of alternating currents, and they may be so wound, or the respective circuits in which they are included may be so arranged, that the circuit of coils G will have, independently of the particular construction described, a higher self-induction than the other circuit or branch.

Coils F are wrapped around the pole pieces B, and additional coils G are wound on the pole pieces C. These coils are connected in series within two circuits, which branch off from a generator producing alternating currents. They can be arranged or wound in such a way that the circuit of coils G has a higher self-induction than the other circuit or branch, regardless of the specific design mentioned.

The function of the shunts or bridges E is that they shall form with the cores C a closed magnetic circuit for a current up to a predetermined strength, so that when saturated by such current and unable to carry more lines of force than such a current produces they will to no further appreciable extent interfere with the development, by a stronger current, of free magnetic poles at the ends of the cores C.

The purpose of the shunts or bridges E is to create a closed magnetic circuit with the cores C for a current up to a specified strength. Once saturated by this current and unable to handle more magnetic lines than what it produces, they will not significantly hinder the formation of free magnetic poles at the ends of the cores C when a stronger current is applied.

In such a motor the current is so retarded in the coils G, and the manifestation of the free magnetism in the poles C is so delayed beyond the period of maximum magnetic effect in poles B, that a strong torque is produced and the motor operates with approximately the power developed in a motor of this kind energized by independently generated currents differing by a full quarter phase.

In this motor, the current in the coils G is significantly lagging, and the appearance of the free magnetism at the poles C is postponed beyond the peak magnetic effect at poles B, creating a strong torque. As a result, the motor runs with about the same power as a similar motor powered by independently generated currents that are a full quarter phase apart.


CHAPTER XIV.

Type of Tesla Single-Phase Motor.

Up to this point, two principal types of Tesla motors have been described: First, those containing two or more energizing circuits through which are caused to pass alternating currents differing from one another in phase to an extent sufficient to produce a continuous progression or shifting of the poles or points of greatest magnetic effect, in obedience to which the movable element of the motor is maintained in rotation; second, those containing poles, or parts of different magnetic susceptibility, which under the energizing influence of the same current or two currents coinciding in phase will exhibit differences in their magnetic periods or phases. In the first class of motors the torque is due to the magnetism established in different portions of the motor by currents from the same or from independent sources, and exhibiting time differences in phase. In the second class the torque results from the energizing effects of a current upon different parts of the motor which differ in magnetic susceptibility—in other words, parts which respond in the same relative degree to the action of a current, not simultaneously, but after different intervals of time.

Up to this point, two main types of Tesla motors have been described: First, those that have two or more energizing circuits through which alternating currents flow, differing in phase enough to create a continuous movement of the poles or areas of maximum magnetic effect, which keeps the movable part of the motor in rotation; second, those that have poles or parts with different magnetic sensitivities, which, when energized by the same current or two currents that are in phase, will show differences in their magnetic periods or phases. In the first type of motor, the torque comes from the magnetism created in different areas of the motor by currents from either the same or separate sources, showing time differences in phase. In the second type, the torque is a result of the energizing effects of a current on different parts of the motor that have varying magnetic sensitivities—in other words, parts that react to the current at different times, not all at once.

In another Tesla motor, however, the torque, instead of being solely the result of a time difference in the magnetic periods or phases of the poles or attractive parts to whatever cause due, is produced by an angular displacement of the parts which, though movable with respect to one another, are magnetized simultaneously, or approximately so, by the same currents. This principle of operation has been embodied practically in a motor in which the necessary angular displacement between the points of greatest magnetic attraction in the two elements of the motor—the armature and field—is obtained by the direction of the lamination of the magnetic cores of the elements.

In another Tesla motor, the torque isn't just caused by the time difference in the magnetic phases of the poles or other attractive parts. Instead, it's produced by an angular displacement of the components that, while movable relative to each other, are magnetized at the same time, or almost so, by the same currents. This operating principle has been practically applied in a motor where the necessary angular displacement between the points of greatest magnetic attraction in the two parts of the motor—the armature and the field—is achieved by how the magnetic cores of the components are laminated.

Fig. 62 is a side view of such a motor with a portion of its armature core exposed. Fig. 63 is an end or edge view of the[Pg 77] same. Fig. 64 is a central cross-section of the same, the armature being shown mainly in elevation.

Fig. 62 is a side view of a motor with part of its armature core exposed. Fig. 63 is a front or edge view of the[Pg 77] same. Fig. 64 is a central cross-section of the motor, showing the armature mainly in elevation.

Fig. 62, 63, 64.
Fig. 62.Fig. 63.Fig. 64.

Let A A designate two plates built up of thin sections or laminæ of soft iron insulated more or less from one another and held together by bolts a and secured to a base B. The inner faces of these plates contain recesses or grooves in which a coil or coils D are secured obliquely to the direction of the laminations. Within the coils D is a disc E, preferably composed of a spirally-wound iron wire or ribbon or a series of concentric rings and mounted on a shaft F, having bearings in the plates A A. Such a device when acted upon by an alternating current is capable of rotation and constitutes a motor, the operation of which may be explained in the following manner: A current or current-impulse traversing the coils D tends to magnetize the cores A A and E, all of which are within the influence of the field of the coils. The poles thus established would naturally lie in the same line at right angles to the coils D, but in the plates A they are deflected by reason of the direction of the laminations, and appear at or near the extremities of these plates. In the disc, however, where these conditions are not present, the poles or points of greatest attraction are on a line at right angles to the plane of the coils; hence there will be a torque established by this angular displacement of the poles or magnetic lines, which starts the disc in rotation, the magnetic lines of the armature and field tending toward a position of parallelism. This rotation is continued and maintained by the reversals of the current in coils D D, which change alternately the polarity of the field-cores A A. This rotary tendency or effect will be greatly[Pg 78] increased by winding the disc with conductors G, closed upon themselves and having a radial direction, whereby the magnetic intensity of the poles of the disc will be greatly increased by the energizing effect of the currents induced in the coils G by the alternating currents in coils D.

Let A A represent two plates made up of thin layers or laminations of soft iron, somewhat insulated from each other and held together by bolts a, fixed to a base B. The inner surfaces of these plates have recesses or grooves where one or more coils D are attached at an angle to the direction of the laminations. Inside the coils D is a disc E, ideally made of a spirally wound iron wire or ribbon or a series of concentric rings, which is mounted on a shaft F with bearings in the plates A A. When powered by an alternating current, this setup can rotate and acts as a motor, which can be explained as follows: A current or current impulse passing through the coils D magnetizes the cores A A and E, all influenced by the field of the coils. The resulting poles would generally align perpendicularly to the coils D, but in the plates A, they are shifted due to the direction of the laminations and appear at or near the ends of these plates. In the disc, however, where these conditions don't exist, the poles or points of strongest attraction are aligned perpendicularly to the plane of the coils; therefore, an angular displacement of the poles or magnetic lines generates torque that initiates disc rotation, with the magnetic lines of the armature and field seeking parallel alignment. This rotation continues and is sustained by the reversal of the current in coils D D, which alternately changes the polarity of the field cores A A. This rotational tendency or effect will be significantly[Pg 78] enhanced by wrapping the disc with conductors G, which loop back on themselves and are arranged radially, thereby greatly increasing the magnetic intensity of the disc's poles due to the energizing effect of currents induced in coils G by the alternating currents in coils D.

The cores of the disc and field may or may not be of different magnetic susceptibility—that is to say, they may both be of the same kind of iron, so as to be magnetized at approximately the same instant by the coils D; or one may be of soft iron and the other of hard, in order that a certain time may elapse between the periods of their magnetization. In either case rotation will be produced; but unless the disc is provided with the closed energizing coils it is desirable that the above-described difference of magnetic susceptibility be utilized to assist in its rotation.

The cores of the disk and the field might have the same or different magnetic susceptibility. This means they could both be made of the same type of iron and become magnetized at roughly the same time by the coils D. Alternatively, one could be made of soft iron and the other of hard iron, allowing a specific delay between their magnetization periods. In either scenario, rotation will happen; however, if the disk doesn't have closed energizing coils, it's better to use the aforementioned difference in magnetic susceptibility to help with its rotation.

The cores of the field and armature may be made in various ways, as will be well understood, it being only requisite that the laminations in each be in such direction as to secure the necessary angular displacement of the points of greatest attraction. Moreover, since the disc may be considered as made up of an infinite number of radial arms, it is obvious that what is true of a disc holds for many other forms of armature.

The cores of the field and armature can be made in different ways, as you would know, as long as the laminations in each are arranged to ensure the required angular displacement of the points with the highest attraction. Additionally, since the disc can be thought of as composed of countless radial arms, it's clear that what applies to a disc also applies to many other types of armature.


CHAPTER XV.

Motors with Circuits of Varying Resistance.

As has been pointed out elsewhere, the lag or retardation of the phases of an alternating current is directly proportional to the self-induction and inversely proportional to the resistance of the circuit through which the current flows. Hence, in order to secure the proper differences of phase between the two motor-circuits, it is desirable to make the self-induction in one much higher and the resistance much lower than the self-induction and resistance, respectively, in the other. At the same time the magnetic quantities of the two poles or sets of poles which the two circuits produce should be approximately equal. These requirements have led Mr. Tesla to the invention of a motor having the following general characteristics: The coils which are included in that energizing circuit which is to have the higher self-induction are made of coarse wire, or a conductor of relatively low resistance, and with the greatest possible length or number of turns. In the other set of coils a comparatively few turns of finer wire are used, or a wire of higher resistance. Furthermore, in order to approximate the magnetic quantities of the poles excited by these coils, Mr. Tesla employs in the self-induction circuit cores much longer than those in the other or resistance circuit.

As mentioned elsewhere, the delay or lag in the phases of an alternating current relates directly to the self-induction and inversely to the circuit's resistance that the current flows through. Therefore, to achieve the correct phase differences between the two motor circuits, it's better to have the self-induction in one circuit much higher and the resistance much lower than in the other. At the same time, the magnetic outputs of the two sets of poles created by the circuits should be roughly equal. These needs inspired Mr. Tesla to invent a motor with the following key features: The coils in the circuit meant for higher self-induction are made of thick wire or a conductor with relatively low resistance and have the longest possible length or number of turns. In the other set of coils, a smaller number of turns of thinner wire or a wire with higher resistance is used. Additionally, to balance the magnetic outputs of the poles activated by these coils, Mr. Tesla employs cores in the self-induction circuit that are much longer than those in the resistance circuit.

Fig. 65 is a part sectional view of the motor at right angles to the shaft. Fig. 66 is a diagram of the field circuits.

Fig. 65 is a partial sectional view of the motor at a right angle to the shaft. Fig. 66 is a diagram of the field circuits.

In Fig. 66, let A represent the coils in one motor circuit, and B those in the other. The circuit A is to have the higher self-induction. There are, therefore, used a long length or a large number of turns of coarse wire in forming the coils of this circuit. For the circuit B, a smaller conductor is employed, or a conductor of a higher resistance than copper, such as German silver or iron, and the coils are wound with fewer turns. In applying these coils to a motor, Mr. Tesla builds up a field-magnet of plates C, of iron and steel, secured together in the usual manner[Pg 80] by bolts D. Each plate is formed with four (more or less) long cores E, around which is a space to receive the coil and an equal number of short projections F to receive the coils of the resistance-circuit. The plates are generally annular in shape, having an open space in the centre for receiving the armature G, which Mr. Tesla prefers to wind with closed coils. An alternating current divided between the two circuits is retarded as to its phases in the circuit A to a much greater extent than in the circuit B. By reason of the relative sizes and disposition of the cores and coils the magnetic effect of the poles E and F upon the armature closely approximate.

In Fig. 66, let A represent the coils in one motor circuit and B those in the other. The circuit A will have higher self-induction. Therefore, a longer length or a larger number of turns of thicker wire is used to form the coils of this circuit. For circuit B, a smaller conductor or a conductor with a higher resistance than copper, such as German silver or iron, is used, and the coils are wound with fewer turns. When applying these coils to a motor, Mr. Tesla constructs a field magnet using plates C, made of iron and steel, secured in the usual way[Pg 80] with bolts D. Each plate has four (more or less) long cores E, with a space for the coil and an equal number of short projections F for the coils of the resistance circuit. The plates are typically ring-shaped, with an opening in the center to hold the armature G, which Mr. Tesla prefers to wind with closed coils. An alternating current split between the two circuits is delayed in terms of its phases in circuit A to a much greater extent than in circuit B. Due to the relative sizes and arrangement of the cores and coils, the magnetic effect of the poles E and F on the armature is very similar.

Fig. 65, 66.
Fig. 65.Fig. 66.

An important result secured by the construction shown here is that these coils which are designed to have the higher self-induction are almost completely surrounded by iron, and that the retardation is thus very materially increased.

An important result achieved by the construction shown here is that these coils, which are designed to have higher self-induction, are almost completely surrounded by iron, and as a result, the retardation is significantly increased.


CHAPTER XVI.

Motor with Equal Magnetic Energies in the Field and Armature.

Let it be assumed that the energy as represented in the magnetism in the field of a given rotating field motor is ninety and that of the armature ten. The sum of these quantities, which represents the total energy expended in driving the motor, is one hundred; but, assuming that the motor be so constructed that the energy in the field is represented by fifty, and that in the armature by fifty, the sum is still one hundred; but while in the first instance the product is nine hundred, in the second it is two thousand five hundred, and as the energy developed is in proportion to these products it is clear that those motors are the most efficient—other things being equal—in which the magnetic energies developed in the armature and field are equal. These results Mr. Tesla obtains by using the same amount of copper or ampere turns in both elements when the cores of both are equal, or approximately so, and the same current energizes both; or in cases where the currents in one element are induced to those of the other he uses in the induced coils an excess of copper over that in the primary element or conductor.

Assume that the energy represented by the magnetism in the field of a rotating field motor is ninety, while that of the armature is ten. The total energy used to drive the motor is one hundred; however, if the motor is designed so that the energy in the field is fifty and the energy in the armature is also fifty, the total remains one hundred. In the first case, the product is nine hundred, while in the second case, it’s two thousand five hundred. Since the energy produced is proportional to these products, it’s clear that the most efficient motors—assuming everything else is equal—are those in which the magnetic energies in the armature and field are equal. Mr. Tesla achieves these results by using the same amount of copper or ampere turns in both components when their cores are equal or nearly so, and the same current powers both; or in situations where the currents in one component induce those in the other, he uses more copper in the induced coils than in the primary component or conductor.

Fig. 67. Fig. 67.

The conventional figure of a motor here introduced, Fig. 67, will give an idea of the solution furnished by Mr. Tesla for the specific problem. Referring to the drawing, A is the field-magnet, B the armature, C the field coils, and D the armature-coils of the motor.

The standard design of a motor presented here, Fig. 67, provides an understanding of the solution provided by Mr. Tesla for the specific issue. Looking at the drawing, A is the field magnet, B is the armature, C represents the field coils, and D indicates the armature coils of the motor.

Generally speaking, if the mass of the cores of armature and field be equal, the amount of copper or ampere turns of the energizing coils on both should also be equal; but these conditions will be modified in different forms of machine. It will be understood that these results are most advantageous when existing under the conditions presented where the motor is running with its normal load, a point to be well borne in mind.

Generally speaking, if the mass of the armature and field cores is equal, the amount of copper or ampere turns in the energizing coils on both should also be equal; however, these conditions will vary in different types of machines. It's important to note that these results are most beneficial when the motor is operating under its normal load, which is a point to keep in mind.


CHAPTER XVII.

Motors with Aligned Maximum Magnetic Effects in the Armature and Field.

In this form of motor, Mr. Tesla's object is to design and build machines wherein the maxima of the magnetic effects of the armature and field will more nearly coincide than in some of the types previously under consideration. These types are: First, motors having two or more energizing circuits of the same electrical character, and in the operation of which the currents used differ primarily in phase; second, motors with a plurality of energizing circuits of different electrical character, in or by means of which the difference of phase is produced artificially, and, third, motors with a plurality of energizing circuits, the currents in one being induced from currents in another. Considering the structural and operative conditions of any one of them—as, for example, that first named—the armature which is mounted to rotate in obedience to the co-operative influence or action of the energizing circuits has coils wound upon it which are closed upon themselves and in which currents are induced by the energizing-currents with the object and result of energizing the armature-core; but under any such conditions as must exist in these motors, it is obvious that a certain time must elapse between the manifestations of an energizing current impulse in the field coils, and the corresponding magnetic state or phase in the armature established by the current induced thereby; consequently a given magnetic influence or effect in the field which is the direct result of a primary current impulse will have become more or less weakened or lost before the corresponding effect in the armature indirectly produced has reached its maximum. This is a condition unfavorable to efficient working in certain cases—as, for instance, when the progress of the resultant poles or points of maximum attraction is very great, or when a very high number of alternations is employed—for it is apparent that a stronger[Pg 84] tendency to rotation will be maintained if the maximum magnetic attractions or conditions in both armature and field coincide, the energy developed by a motor being measured by the product of the magnetic quantities of the armature and field.

In this type of motor, Mr. Tesla aims to design and create machines where the maximum magnetic effects of the armature and the field are more closely aligned than in some of the earlier models considered. These models include: first, motors with two or more energizing circuits of the same electrical type, where the currents used primarily differ in phase; second, motors with multiple energizing circuits of varied electrical types, which create phase differences artificially; and third, motors with multiple energizing circuits, where currents in one are induced by currents in another. Looking at the structure and operation of any one of them—such as the first type—the armature, which rotates due to the combined influence of the energizing circuits, has coils wrapped around it that are closed on themselves, with currents induced by the energizing currents to energize the armature core. However, under the conditions inherent in these motors, it’s clear that some time must pass between the energizing current impulse in the field coils and the corresponding magnetic state or phase in the armature that results from the induced current. Therefore, the magnetic influence in the field, which directly results from a primary current impulse, will have weakened or been lost by the time the corresponding effect in the armature reaches its peak. This is an unfavorable condition for efficient operation in certain situations—like when the movement of the resultant poles or points of maximum attraction is very fast, or when a very high number of alternations is used—because a stronger tendency to rotate will be sustained if the peak magnetic attractions or conditions in both the armature and the field align, with the energy produced by a motor being determined by the product of the magnetic quantities of the armature and field.

To secure this coincidence of maximum magnetic effects, Mr. Tesla has devised various means, as explained below. Fig. 68 is a diagrammatic illustration of a Tesla motor system in which the alternating currents proceed from independent sources and differ primarily in phase.

To achieve this alignment of maximum magnetic effects, Mr. Tesla has developed several methods, as detailed below. Fig. 68 is a diagram that shows a Tesla motor system where the alternating currents come from separate sources and mainly differ in phase.

Fig. 68, 69.
Fig. 68.Fig. 69.

A designates the field-magnet or magnetic frame of the motor; B B, oppositely located pole-pieces adapted to receive the coils of one energizing circuit; and C C, similar pole-pieces for the coils of the other energizing circuit. These circuits are designated, respectively, by D E, the conductor D'' forming a common return to the generator G. Between these poles is mounted an armature—for example, a ring or annular armature, wound with a series of coils F, forming a closed circuit or circuits. The action or operation of a motor thus constructed is now well understood. It will be observed, however, that the magnetism of poles B, for[Pg 85] example, established by a current impulse in the coils thereon, precedes the magnetic effect set up in the armature by the induced current in coils F. Consequently the mutual attraction between the armature and field-poles is considerably reduced. The same conditions will be found to exist if, instead of assuming the poles B or C as acting independently, we regard the ideal resultant of both acting together, which is the real condition. To remedy this, the motor field is constructed with secondary poles B' C', which are situated between the others. These pole-pieces are wound with coils D' E', the former in derivation to the coils D, the latter to coils E. The main or primary coils D and E are wound for a different self-induction from that of the coils D' and E', the relations being so fixed that if the currents in D and E differ, for example, by a quarter-phase, the currents in each secondary coil, as D' E', will differ from those in its appropriate primary D or E by, say, forty-five degrees, or one-eighth of a period.

A represents the field magnet or magnetic frame of the motor; B B, oppositely positioned pole pieces that are designed to hold the coils of one energizing circuit; and C C, similar pole pieces for the coils of the other energizing circuit. These circuits are referred to as D E, with conductor D'' serving as a common return to the generator G. An armature, such as a ring or annular armature, is mounted between these poles, wound with a series of coils F, forming a closed circuit or circuits. The function of a motor constructed this way is now well understood. However, it should be noted that the magnetism of poles B, for example, created by a current impulse in the coils, occurs before the magnetic effect generated in the armature by the induced current in coils F. As a result, the mutual attraction between the armature and field poles is significantly reduced. The same situation will be observed if, rather than treating the poles B or C as acting independently, we consider the ideal combination of both working together, which reflects the actual condition. To address this, the motor field is designed with secondary poles B' C', located between the others. These pole pieces are wound with coils D' E', with the former connected in parallel to coils D and the latter to coils E. The main or primary coils D and E are wound for different self-induction than the coils D' and E', such that if the currents in D and E vary, for instance, by a quarter-phase, the currents in each secondary coil, D' E', will differ from those in their corresponding primary coils D or E by about forty-five degrees, or one-eighth of a period.

Now, assuming that an impulse or alternation in circuit or branch E is just beginning, while in the branch D it is just falling from maximum, the conditions are those of a quarter-phase difference. The ideal resultant of the attractive forces of the two sets of poles B C therefore may be considered as progressing from poles B to poles C, while the impulse in E is rising to maximum, and that in D is falling to zero or minimum. The polarity set up in the armature, however, lags behind the manifestations of field magnetism, and hence the maximum points of attraction in armature and field, instead of coinciding, are angularly displaced. This effect is counteracted by the supplemental poles B' C'. The magnetic phases of these poles succeed those of poles B C by the same, or nearly the same, period of time as elapses between the effect of the poles B C and the corresponding induced effect in the armature; hence the magnetic conditions of poles B' C' and of the armature more nearly coincide and a better result is obtained. As poles B' C' act in conjunction with the poles in the armature established by poles B C, so in turn poles C B act similarly with the poles set up by B' C', respectively. Under such conditions the retardation of the magnetic effect of the armature and that of the secondary poles will bring the maximum of the two more nearly into coincidence and a correspondingly stronger torque or magnetic attraction secured.

Now, assuming that an impulse or change in circuit or branch E is just starting, while in branch D it is just decreasing from its peak, the conditions represent a quarter-phase difference. The ideal result of the attractive forces from the two sets of poles B C can be seen as moving from poles B to poles C, while the impulse in E is rising to its peak, and that in D is dropping to zero or its minimum. However, the polarity created in the armature lags behind the effects of field magnetism, and thus the maximum points of attraction in the armature and field do not align but are instead angularly displaced. This effect is counterbalanced by the additional poles B' C'. The magnetic phases of these poles follow those of poles B C in the same, or nearly the same, time frame that elapses between the effects of poles B C and the corresponding induced effect in the armature; therefore, the magnetic conditions of poles B' C' and the armature align more closely, resulting in a better outcome. As poles B' C' work with the poles in the armature created by poles B C, poles C B similarly operate with the poles established by B' C', respectively. In these conditions, the delay in the magnetic effect of the armature and that of the secondary poles will bring the maximums of the two closer together, resulting in a correspondingly stronger torque or magnetic attraction.

In such a disposition as is shown in Fig. 68 it will be observed[Pg 86] that as the adjacent pole-pieces of either circuit are of like polarity they will have a certain weakening effect upon one another. Mr. Tesla therefore prefers to remove the secondary poles from the direct influence of the others. This may be done by constructing a motor with two independent sets of fields, and with either one or two armatures electrically connected, or by using two armatures and one field. These modifications are illustrated further on.

In the arrangement shown in Fig. 68, it can be seen[Pg 86] that the adjacent pole pieces of either circuit have the same polarity, which weakens their effects on each other. Mr. Tesla prefers to separate the secondary poles from the direct influence of the others. This can be achieved by building a motor with two independent sets of fields, and either one or two armatures connected electrically, or by using two armatures and one field. These modifications are explained further on.

Fig. 70, 71.
Fig. 70.Fig. 71.

Fig. 69 is a diagrammatic illustration of a motor and system in which the difference of phase is artificially produced. There are two coils D D in one branch and two coils E E in another branch of the main circuit from the generator G. These two circuits or branches are of different self-induction, one, as D, being higher than the other. This is graphically indicated by making coils D much larger than coils E. By reason of the difference in the electrical character of the two circuits, the phases of current in one are retarded to a greater extent than the other. Let this difference be thirty degrees. A motor thus constructed will rotate under the action of an alternating current; but as happens in the case previously described the corresponding magnetic effects of the armature and field do not coincide owing to the time that elapses between a given magnetic effect in the armature and[Pg 87] the condition of the field that produces it. The secondary or supplemental poles B' C' are therefore availed of. There being thirty degrees difference of phase between the currents in coils D E, the magnetic effect of poles B' C' should correspond to that produced by a current differing from the current in coils D or E by fifteen degrees. This we can attain by winding each supplemental pole B' C' with two coils H H'. The coils H are included in a derived circuit having the same self-induction as circuit D, and coils H' in a circuit having the same self-induction as circuit E, so that if these circuits differ by thirty degrees the magnetism of poles B' C' will correspond to that produced by a current differing from that in either D or E by fifteen degrees. This is true in all other cases. For example, if in Fig. 68 the coils D' E' be replaced by the coils H H' included in the derived circuits, the magnetism of the poles B' C' will correspond in effect or phase, if it may be so termed, to that produced by a current differing from that in either circuit D or E by forty-five degrees, or one-eighth of a period.

Fig. 69 is a diagram showing a motor and system that creates a phase difference artificially. There are two coils D D in one branch and two coils E E in another branch of the main circuit from the generator G. These two branches have different self-induction, with one, D, having a higher self-induction than the other. This is visually represented by making coils D much larger than coils E. Because of the difference in the electrical characteristics of the two circuits, the current phase in one is delayed more than in the other. Let’s say this difference is thirty degrees. A motor built this way will rotate when powered by an alternating current, but, as mentioned earlier, the related magnetic effects of the armature and field don’t align because of the time lag between a specific magnetic effect in the armature and the field state that generates it. Therefore, the secondary or supplemental poles B' C' are used. With a thirty-degree phase difference between the currents in coils D E, the magnetic effect of poles B' C' should match that produced by a current that differs from the current in coils D or E by fifteen degrees. We can achieve this by winding each supplemental pole B' C' with two coils H H'. The coils H are part of a derived circuit with the same self-induction as circuit D, and the coils H' are in a circuit with the same self-induction as circuit E. So, if these circuits differ by thirty degrees, the magnetism of poles B' C' will match that produced by a current differing from the current in either D or E by fifteen degrees. This is true in all other scenarios. For example, if in Fig. 68 the coils D' E' are replaced by the coils H H' in the derived circuits, the magnetism of the poles B' C' will correspond in effect or phase, so to speak, to that produced by a current differing from that in either circuit D or E by forty-five degrees, or one-eighth of a period.

This invention as applied to a derived circuit motor is illustrated in Figs. 70 and 71. The former is an end view of the motor with the armature in section and a diagram of connections, and Fig. 71 a vertical section through the field. These figures are also drawn to show one of the dispositions of two fields that may be adopted in carrying out the principle. The poles B B C C are in one field, the remaining poles in the other. The former are wound with primary coils I J and secondary coils I' J', the latter with coils K L. The primary coils I J are in derived circuits, between which, by reason of their different self-induction, there is a difference of phase, say, of thirty degrees. The coils I' K are in circuit with one another, as also are coils J' L, and there should be a difference of phase between the currents in coils K and L and their corresponding primaries of, say, fifteen degrees. If the poles B C are at right angles, the armature-coils should be connected directly across, or a single armature core wound from end to end may be used; but if the poles B C be in line there should be an angular displacement of the armature coils, as will be well understood.

This invention, when applied to a derived circuit motor, is shown in Figs. 70 and 71. The first figure is an end view of the motor with a section of the armature and a diagram of the connections, while Fig. 71 presents a vertical section of the field. These figures also illustrate one of the configurations of two fields that can be used to implement the principle. The poles B B C C are located in one field, while the other poles are in the second field. The first set is wound with primary coils I J and secondary coils I' J', while the second set has coils K L. The primary coils I J are in derived circuits, and because of their different self-induction, there is a phase difference, for example, of thirty degrees. The coils I' K are connected to each other, as are coils J' L, and there should be a phase difference between the currents in coils K and L and their corresponding primaries of about fifteen degrees. If the poles B C are at right angles, the armature coils should be connected directly across, or a single armature core wound from end to end may be used; but if the poles B C are aligned, there should be an angular displacement of the armature coils, which should be clear.

The operation will be understood from the foregoing. The maximum magnetic condition of a pair of poles, as B' B', coincides closely with the maximum effect in the armature, which lags behind the corresponding condition in poles B B.

The operation will be understood from the above. The maximum magnetic condition of a pair of poles, as B' B', closely aligns with the maximum effect in the armature, which lags behind the corresponding condition in poles B B.


CHAPTER XVIII.

Motor Based on the Phase Difference in the Magnetization of the Inner and Outer Sections of an Iron Core.

It is well known that if a magnetic core, even if laminated or subdivided, be wound with an insulated coil and a current of electricity be directed through the coil, the magnetization of the entire core does not immediately ensue, the magnetizing effect not being exhibited in all parts simultaneously. This may be attributed to the fact that the action of the current is to energize first those laminæ or parts of the core nearest the surface and adjacent to the exciting-coil, and from thence the action progresses toward the interior. A certain interval of time therefore elapses between the manifestation of magnetism in the external and the internal sections or layers of the core. If the core be thin or of small mass, this effect may be inappreciable; but in the case of a thick core, or even of a comparatively thin one, if the number of alternations or rate of change of the current strength be very great, the time interval occurring between the manifestations of magnetism in the interior of the core and in those parts adjacent to the coil is more marked. In the construction of such apparatus as motors which are designed to be run by alternating or equivalent currents—such as pulsating or undulating currents generally—Mr. Tesla found it desirable and even necessary to give due consideration to this phenomenon and to make special provisions in order to obviate its consequences. With the specific object of taking advantage of this action or effect, and to render it more pronounced, he constructs a field magnet in which the parts of the core or cores that exhibit at different intervals of time the magnetic effect imparted to them by alternating or equivalent currents in an energizing coil or coils, are so placed with relation to a rotating armature as to exert thereon their attractive effect successively in the order of their magnetization. By this means he secures a result similar to that which he had previously attained in other forms or types of mo[Pg 89]tor in which by means of one or more alternating currents he has produced the rotation or progression of the magnetic poles.

It’s well known that when a magnetic core, even if it’s laminated or divided, is wrapped with an insulated coil and an electric current flows through it, the magnetization of the entire core doesn’t happen instantly; the magnetizing effect isn’t felt in all parts at the same time. This happens because the current first energizes the layers or parts of the core closest to the surface and next to the coil, and then the effect spreads inward. As a result, there’s a noticeable delay between when magnetism appears in the outer and inner sections or layers of the core. If the core is thin or small, this delay may be unnoticeable; however, in the case of a thick core, or even a relatively thin one, if the current changes frequently or rapidly, the time gap between magnetism being felt in the core’s interior and the parts near the coil is more pronounced. When constructing devices like motors that run on alternating or similar currents—like pulsating or undulating currents—Mr. Tesla recognized the importance of this phenomenon and saw the need to account for it to prevent its negative effects. To take advantage of this action and enhance its visibility, he designs a field magnet where the portions of the core that show magnetism at different times due to the alternating currents in the energizing coils are arranged in relation to a rotating armature to exert their attractive force on it in the order they become magnetized. This approach achieves results similar to what he previously achieved with other types of motors, where he used one or more alternating currents to create the rotation or movement of the magnetic poles.

This new mode of operation will now be described. Fig. 72 is a side elevation of such motor. Fig. 73 is a side elevation of a more practicable and efficient embodiment of the invention. Fig. 74 is a central vertical section of the same in the plane of the axis of rotation.

This new way of working will be explained now. Fig. 72 is a side view of this motor. Fig. 73 is a side view of a more practical and efficient version of the invention. Fig. 74 is a central vertical section taken along the axis of rotation.

Fig. 72 and 73. Figs. 72 and 73.

Referring to Fig. 72, let X represent a large iron core, which may be composed of a number of sheets or laminæ of soft iron or steel. Surrounding this core is a coil Y, which is connected with a source E of rapidly varying currents. Let us consider now the magnetic conditions existing in this core at any point, as b, at or near the centre, and any other point, as a, nearer the surface. When a current impulse is started in the magnetizing coil Y, the section or part at a, being close to the coil, is immediately energized, while the section or part at b, which, to use a convenient expression, is "protected" by the intervening sections or layers between a and b, does not at once exhibit its magnetism. However, as the magnetization of a increases, b becomes also affected, reaching finally its maximum strength some time later than a. Upon the weakening of the current the magnetization of a first diminishes, while b still exhibits its maximum strength;[Pg 90] but the continued weakening of a is attended by a subsequent weakening of b. Assuming the current to be an alternating one, a will now be reversed, while b still continues of the first imparted polarity. This action continues the magnetic condition of b, following that of a in the manner above described. If an armature—for instance, a simple disc F, mounted to rotate freely on an axis—be brought into proximity to the core, a movement of rotation will be imparted to the disc, the direction depending upon its position relatively to the core, the tendency being to turn the portion of the disc nearest to the core from a to b, as indicated in Fig. 72.

Referring to Fig. 72, let X represent a large iron core, which may be made up of several sheets or layers of soft iron or steel. Surrounding this core is a coil Y, connected to a source E of rapidly changing currents. Now, let's look at the magnetic conditions in this core at any point, like b, near the center, and another point, like a, closer to the surface. When a current is introduced into the magnetizing coil Y, the section at a, being close to the coil, gets energized immediately, while the section at b, which is "protected" by the layers between a and b, doesn't show its magnetism right away. However, as the magnetization of a increases, b also begins to respond, eventually reaching its peak strength some time after a. When the current weakens, the magnetization of a decreases first, while b retains its maximum strength; [Pg 90] but as a continues to weaken, b will also weaken afterward. If the current is alternating, a will switch its polarity, while b maintains the first polarity imparted to it. This process continues with b following a as described. If an armature—like a simple disc F, allowed to rotate freely on an axis—is brought close to the core, the disc will start to rotate, with the direction depending on its position relative to the core, tending to turn the part of the disc closest to the core from a to b, as shown in Fig. 72.

Fig. 74. Fig. 74.

This action or principle of operation has been embodied in a practicable form of motor, which is illustrated in Fig. 73. Let A in that figure represent a circular frame of iron, from diametrically opposite points of the interior of which the cores project. Each core is composed of three main parts B, B and C, and they are similarly formed with a straight portion or body e, around which the energizing coil is wound, a curved arm or extension c, and an inwardly projecting pole or end d. Each core is made up of two parts B B, with their polar extensions reaching in one direction, and a part C between the other two, and with its polar extension reaching in the opposite direction. In order to lessen in the cores the circulation of currents induced therein, the several sections are insulated from one another in the manner usually[Pg 91] followed in such cases. These cores are wound with coils D, which are connected in the same circuit, either in parallel or series, and supplied with an alternating or a pulsating current, preferably the former, by a generator E, represented diagrammatically. Between the cores or their polar extensions is mounted a cylindrical or similar armature F, wound with magnetizing coils G, closed upon themselves.

This action or principle of operation has been made into a workable version of a motor, as shown in Fig. 73. Let A in that figure represent a circular iron frame, from which cores project from diametrically opposite points inside. Each core consists of three main parts B, B, and C, and they are similarly shaped with a straight section or body e, around which the energizing coil is wrapped, a curved arm or extension c, and an inwardly extending pole or end d. Each core is made up of two parts B B with their polar extensions going in one direction, and a part C positioned between the other two, with its polar extension directed the opposite way. To reduce the flow of currents induced in the cores, the different sections are insulated from each other in the usual way[Pg 91]. These cores are wrapped with coils D, which are connected in the same circuit, either in parallel or series, and powered by an alternating or pulsating current, preferably the former, from a generator E, shown diagrammatically. Between the cores or their polar extensions is a cylindrical or similar armature F, wound with magnetizing coils G, closed upon themselves.

The operation of this motor is as follows: When a current impulse or alternation is directed through the coils D, the sections B B of the cores, being on the surface and in close proximity to the coils, are immediately energized. The sections C, on the other hand, are protected from the magnetizing influence of the coil by the interposed layers of iron B B. As the magnetism of B B increases, however, the sections C are also energized; but they do not attain their maximum strength until a certain time subsequent to the exhibition by the sections B B of their maximum. Upon the weakening of the current the magnetic strength of B B first diminishes, while the sections C have still their maximum strength; but as B B continue to weaken the interior sections are similarly weakened. B B may then begin to exhibit an opposite polarity, which is followed later by a similar change on C, and this action continues. B B and C may therefore be considered as separate field-magnets, being extended so as to act on the armature in the most efficient positions, and the effect is similar to that in the other forms of Tesla motor—viz., a rotation or progression of the maximum points of the field of force. Any armature—such, for instance, as a disc—mounted in this field would rotate from the pole first to exhibit its magnetism to that which exhibits it later.

The operation of this motor works like this: When a current impulse or change flows through the coils D, the sections B B of the cores, being on the surface and close to the coils, are instantly energized. The sections C, on the other hand, are shielded from the magnetizing effect of the coil by the layers of iron B B in between. However, as the magnetism of B B increases, the sections C also get energized; but they don’t reach their maximum strength until some time after the sections B B show their peak. When the current weakens, the magnetic strength of B B decreases first, while the sections C still have their maximum strength; but as B B continue to weaken, the inner sections also weaken. B B may then start to show an opposite polarity, which is later followed by a similar change in C, and this process keeps going. B B and C can therefore be viewed as separate field magnets, designed to act on the armature in the most effective positions, and the result is similar to other types of Tesla motors—specifically, a rotation or movement of the maximum points of the magnetic field. Any armature—like a disc, for example—that is placed in this field would rotate from the pole that first shows its magnetism to the one that shows it later.

It is evident that the principle here described may be carried out in conjunction with other means for securing a more favorable or efficient action of the motor. For example, the polar extensions of the sections C may be wound or surrounded by closed coils. The effect of these coils will be to still more effectively retard the magnetization of the polar extensions of C.

It is clear that the principle described here can be implemented alongside other methods to achieve a more favorable or efficient operation of the motor. For instance, the polar extensions of the sections C can be wrapped or enclosed by closed coils. These coils will further delay the magnetization of the polar extensions of C.


CHAPTER XIX.

Another Type of Tesla Induction Motor.

It will have been gathered by all who are interested in the advance of the electrical arts, and who follow carefully, step by step, the work of pioneers, that Mr. Tesla has been foremost to utilize inductive effects in permanently closed circuits, in the operation of alternating motors. In this chapter one simple type of such a motor is described and illustrated, which will serve as an exemplification of the principle.

It's clear to anyone interested in the progress of electrical technology and who closely follows the work of pioneers that Mr. Tesla has been a leader in using inductive effects in closed circuits for operating alternating motors. In this chapter, we describe and illustrate a straightforward type of such a motor, which will exemplify the principle.

Let it be assumed that an ordinary alternating current generator is connected up in a circuit of practically no self-induction, such, for example, as a circuit containing incandescent lamps only. On the operation of the machine, alternating currents will be developed in the circuit, and the phases of these currents will theoretically coincide with the phases of the impressed electromotive force. Such currents may be regarded and designated as the "unretarded currents."

Let’s assume that a typical alternating current generator is connected in a circuit with almost no self-induction, like a circuit that only has incandescent lamps. When the machine operates, alternating currents will be produced in the circuit, and the phases of these currents will ideally align with the phases of the applied electromotive force. These currents can be considered and referred to as the "unretarded currents."

It will be understood, of course, that in practice there is always more or less self-induction in the circuit, which modifies to a corresponding extent these conditions; but for convenience this may be disregarded in the consideration of the principle of operation, since the same laws apply. Assume next that a path of currents be formed across any two points of the above circuit, consisting, for example, of the primary of an induction device. The phases of the currents passing through the primary, owing to the self-induction of the same, will not coincide with the phases of the impressed electromotive force, but will lag behind, such lag being directly proportional to the self-induction and inversely proportional to the resistance of the said coil. The insertion of this coil will also cause a lagging or retardation of the currents traversing and delivered by the generator behind the impressed electromotive force, such lag being the mean or resultant of the lag of the current through the primary alone and of the "unretarded current" in the entire working circuit. Next[Pg 93] consider the conditions imposed by the association in inductive relation with the primary coil, of a secondary coil. The current generated in the secondary coil will react upon the primary current, modifying the retardation of the same, according to the amount of self-induction and resistance in the secondary circuit. If the secondary circuit has but little self-induction—as, for instance, when it contains incandescent lamps only—it will increase the actual difference of phase between its own and the primary current, first, by diminishing the lag between the primary current and the impressed electromotive force, and, second, by its own lag or retardation behind the impressed electromotive force. On the other hand, if the secondary circuit have a high self-induction, its lag behind the current in the primary is directly increased, while it will be still further increased if the primary have a very low self-induction. The better results are obtained when the primary has a low self-induction.

It’s important to note that in practice, there is always some level of self-induction in the circuit, which alters these conditions to some extent. However, for simplicity, we can overlook this when discussing how it operates, as the same principles apply. Next, let’s assume a current path is created between any two points in the circuit, for example, using the primary coil of an induction device. The phases of the currents flowing through this primary coil won’t match the phases of the applied electromotive force but will lag behind. This lag is directly proportional to the self-induction and inversely proportional to the resistance of the coil. Adding this coil will also cause a delay in the currents coming from the generator compared to the applied electromotive force. This delay is the average result of the primary current’s lag and the “unretarded current” throughout the entire working circuit. Next[Pg 93], let’s consider how adding a secondary coil affects the primary coil through inductive relations. The current generated in the secondary coil will influence the primary current, adjusting its lag based on the self-induction and resistance in the secondary circuit. If the secondary circuit has little self-induction—like when it only has incandescent lamps—it will increase the actual phase difference between its current and the primary current. This happens first by reducing the lag between the primary current and the applied electromotive force, and second, by adding its own lag behind the applied electromotive force. Conversely, if the secondary circuit has high self-induction, its lag behind the primary current increases. This lag will be even more pronounced if the primary circuit has very low self-induction. Better results occur when the primary has low self-induction.

Fig. 75, 76.
Fig. 75.Fig. 76.

Fig. 75 is a diagram of a Tesla motor embodying this principle. Fig. 76 is a similar diagram of a modification of the same. In Fig. 75 let A designate the field-magnet of a motor which, as in all these motors, is built up of sections or plates. B C are polar projections upon which the coils are wound. Upon one pair of these poles, as C, are wound primary coils D, which are directly connected to the circuit of an alternating current generator G. On the same poles are also wound secondary coils F, either side by side or over or under the primary coils, and these are connected with other coils E, which surround the poles B B.[Pg 94] The currents in both primary and secondary coils in such a motor will be retarded or will lag behind the impressed electromotive force; but to secure a proper difference in phase between the primary and secondary currents themselves, Mr. Tesla increases the resistance of the circuit of the secondary and reduces as much as practicable its self-induction. This is done by using for the secondary circuit, particularly in the coils E, wire of comparatively small diameter and having but few turns around the cores; or by using some conductor of higher specific resistance, such as German silver; or by introducing at some point in the secondary circuit an artificial resistance R. Thus the self-induction of the secondary is kept down and its resistance increased, with the result of decreasing the lag between the impressed electro-motive force and the current in the primary coils and increasing the difference of phase between the primary and secondary currents.

Fig. 75 shows a diagram of a Tesla motor based on this principle. Fig. 76 is a similar diagram illustrating a modification of the same. In Fig. 75, let A represent the field magnet of a motor, which, like all these motors, is made up of sections or plates. B C are the polar projections where the coils are wound. On one pair of these poles, namely C, primary coils D are wound, directly connected to the circuit of an alternating current generator G. Also wound on the same poles are secondary coils F, positioned either alongside or over or under the primary coils, which are connected to additional coils E that surround the poles B B.[Pg 94] The currents in both the primary and secondary coils in such a motor will lag behind the applied electromotive force; however, to create a proper phase difference between the primary and secondary currents themselves, Mr. Tesla increases the resistance in the secondary circuit and reduces its self-induction as much as possible. This is achieved by using wire of relatively small diameter and with fewer turns around the cores for the secondary circuit, especially in coils E; or by employing a conductor with higher specific resistance, like German silver; or by adding an artificial resistor R at some point in the secondary circuit. In this way, the self-induction of the secondary is kept low, and its resistance is increased, leading to a decrease in the lag between the applied electromotive force and the current in the primary coils while increasing the phase difference between the primary and secondary currents.

In the disposition shown in Fig. 76, the lag in the secondary is increased by increasing the self-induction of that circuit, while the increasing tendency of the primary to lag is counteracted by inserting therein a dead resistance. The primary coils D in this case have a low self-induction and high resistance, while the coils E F, included in the secondary circuit, have a high self-induction and low resistance. This may be done by the proper winding of the coils; or in the circuit including the secondary coils E F, we may introduce a self-induction coil S, while in the primary circuit from the generator G and including coils D, there may be inserted a dead resistance R. By this means the difference of phase between the primary and secondary is increased. It is evident that both means of increasing the difference of phase—namely, by the special winding as well as by the supplemental or external inductive and dead resistance—may be employed conjointly.

In the setup shown in Fig. 76, the lag in the secondary circuit is increased by raising the self-induction of that circuit, while the increasing tendency of the primary to lag is balanced by adding a dead resistance. The primary coils D here have low self-induction and high resistance, while the coils E F, part of the secondary circuit, have high self-induction and low resistance. This can be achieved through proper winding of the coils; alternatively, in the circuit with the secondary coils E F, we can add a self-induction coil S, while in the primary circuit from the generator G that includes coils D, we can insert a dead resistance R. This way, the phase difference between the primary and secondary is increased. It's clear that both methods of increasing the phase difference—through special winding as well as by adding external inductive and dead resistance—can be used together.

In the operation of this motor the current impulses in the primary coils induce currents in the secondary coils, and by the conjoint action of the two the points of greatest magnetic attraction are shifted or rotated.

In the operation of this motor, the current pulses in the primary coils create currents in the secondary coils, and through the combined action of both, the points of strongest magnetic attraction are moved or rotated.

In practice it is found desirable to wind the armature with closed coils in which currents are induced by the action thereon of the primaries.

In practice, it's preferred to wind the armature with closed coils, where currents are induced by the influence of the primaries.


CHAPTER XX.

Combinations of Synchronizing Motor and Torque Motor.

In the preceding descriptions relative to synchronizing motors and methods of operating them, reference has been made to the plan adopted by Mr. Tesla, which consists broadly in winding or arranging the motor in such manner that by means of suitable switches it could be started as a multiple-circuit motor, or one operating by a progression of its magnetic poles, and then, when up to speed, or nearly so, converted into an ordinary synchronizing motor, or one in which the magnetic poles were simply alternated. In some cases, as when a large motor is used and when the number of alternations is very high, there is more or less difficulty in bringing the motor to speed as a double or multiple-circuit motor, for the plan of construction which renders the motor best adapted to run as a synchronizing motor impairs its efficiency as a torque or double-circuit motor under the assumed conditions on the start. This will be readily understood, for in a large synchronizing motor the length of the magnetic circuit of the polar projections, and their mass, are so great that apparently considerable time is required for magnetization and demagnetization. Hence with a current of a very high number of alternations the motor may not respond properly. To avoid this objection and to start up a synchronizing motor in which these conditions obtain, Mr. Tesla has combined two motors, one a synchronizing motor, the other a multiple-circuit or torque motor, and by the latter he brings the first-named up to speed, and then either throws the whole current into the synchronizing motor or operates jointly both of the motors.

In the previous descriptions about synchronizing motors and their operating methods, a plan developed by Mr. Tesla has been mentioned. This plan broadly involves arranging the motor so that, with the help of appropriate switches, it can initially function as a multiple-circuit motor—one that operates by moving its magnetic poles—and then, once it reaches speed or nearly so, switch to an ordinary synchronizing motor, where the magnetic poles are simply alternated. In some cases, especially when using a large motor and with a very high number of alternations, it can be challenging to bring the motor up to speed as a double or multiple-circuit motor. The design that makes the motor well-suited for running as a synchronizing motor can hinder its effectiveness as a torque or double-circuit motor when starting. This is easy to understand, as in a large synchronizing motor, the length and mass of the magnetic circuit of the polar projections are significant, resulting in a noticeable amount of time needed for magnetization and demagnetization. Therefore, with a very high frequency, the motor may not respond as expected. To solve this issue and start a synchronizing motor under these circumstances, Mr. Tesla has combined two motors: one is a synchronizing motor and the other is a multiple-circuit or torque motor. The torque motor helps bring the synchronizing motor up to speed, after which the entire current can either be directed into the synchronizing motor or both motors can be operated together.

This invention involves several novel and useful features. It will be observed, in the first place, that both motors are run, without commutators of any kind, and, secondly, that the speed of the torque motor may be higher than that of the synchronizing motor, as will be the case when it contains a fewer number of poles or sets of poles, so that the motor will be more readily and[Pg 96] easily brought up to speed. Thirdly, the synchronizing motor may be constructed so as to have a much more pronounced tendency to synchronism without lessening the facility with which it is started.

This invention features several new and useful aspects. First, it's important to note that both motors operate without any commutators. Second, the torque motor can run at a higher speed than the synchronizing motor when it has fewer poles or sets of poles, allowing it to reach its speed more quickly and easily.[Pg 96] Third, the synchronizing motor can be designed to have a stronger inclination towards synchronism without making it harder to start.

Fig. 77 is a part sectional view of the two motors; Fig. 78 an end view of the synchronizing motor; Fig. 79 an end view and part section of the torque or double-circuit motor; Fig. 80 a diagram of the circuit connections employed; and Figs. 81, 82, 83, 84 and 85 are diagrams of modified dispositions of the two motors.

Fig. 77 shows a partial sectional view of the two motors; Fig. 78 presents an end view of the synchronizing motor; Fig. 79 displays an end view and partial section of the torque or double-circuit motor; Fig. 80 illustrates the circuit connections used; and Figs. 81, 82, 83, 84, and 85 are diagrams of altered setups of the two motors.

Fig. 77. Fig. 77.

Inasmuch as neither motor is doing any work while the current is acting upon the other, the two armatures are rigidly connected, both being mounted upon the same shaft A, the field-magnets B of the synchronizing and C of the torque motor being secured to the same base D. The preferably larger synchronizing motor has polar projections on its armature, which rotate in very close proximity to the poles of the field, and in other respects it conforms to the conditions that are necessary to secure synchronous action. The pole-pieces of the armature are, however, wound with closed coils E, as this obviates the employment of sliding contacts. The smaller or torque motor, on the other hand, has, preferably, a cylindrical armature F, without polar projections and wound with closed coils G. The field-coils of the torque motor are connected up in two series H and I, and the alternating current from the generator is directed through or divided between these two circuits in any manner to produce a progression of the poles or points of maximum magnetic effect. This result is secured by connecting the two motor-circuits in derivation with the circuit[Pg 97] from the generator, inserting in one motor circuit a dead resistance and in the other a self-induction coil, by which means a difference in phase between the two divisions of the current is secured. If both motors have the same number of field poles, the torque motor for a given number of alternations will tend to run at double the speed of the other, for, assuming the connections to be such as to give the best results, its poles are divided into two series and the number of poles is virtually reduced one-half, which being acted upon by the same number of alternations tend to rotate the armature at twice the speed. By this means the main armature is more easily brought to or above the required speed. When the speed necessary for synchronism is imparted to the main motor, the current is shifted from the torque motor into the other.

As neither motor is doing any work while the current is affecting the other, the two armatures are firmly connected, both mounted on the same shaft A, with the field magnets B of the synchronizing motor and C of the torque motor attached to the same base D. The larger synchronizing motor has polar projections on its armature, which rotate very close to the poles of the field, and it meets the necessary conditions for synchronous action. The pole pieces of the armature are wound with closed coils E, eliminating the need for sliding contacts. The smaller torque motor, on the other hand, preferably features a cylindrical armature F, without polar projections and also wound with closed coils G. The field coils of the torque motor are arranged in two series H and I, and the alternating current from the generator is directed through or split between these two circuits in any way that creates a progression of the poles or points of maximum magnetic effect. This outcome is achieved by connecting the two motor circuits in parallel with the circuit[Pg 97] from the generator, adding a dead resistance in one motor circuit and a self-induction coil in the other, which creates a phase difference between the two current divisions. If both motors have the same number of field poles, the torque motor will tend to operate at twice the speed of the other for a given number of alternations. Assuming the connections are optimized for the best results, its poles are divided into two series, effectively reducing the number of poles by half, which, when acted upon by the same number of alternations, causes the armature to rotate at twice the speed. This helps bring the main armature up to or above the necessary speed. Once the main motor reaches the speed needed for synchronism, the current is switched from the torque motor to the other.

Fig. 78, 79.
Fig. 78.Fig. 79.

A convenient arrangement for carrying out this invention is shown in Fig. 80, in which J J are the field coils of the synchronizing, and H I the field coils of the torque motor. L L' are the conductors of the main line. One end of, say, coils H is connected to wire L through a self-induction coil M. One end of the other set of coils I is connected to the same wire through a dead resistance N. The opposite ends of these two circuits are connected to the contact m of a switch, the handle or lever of which is in connection with the line-wire L'. One end of the field circuit of the synchronizing motor is connected to the wire L. The other terminates in the switch-contact n. From the diagram it will be readily seen that if the lever P be turned upon contact m, the torque motor will start by reason of the difference of phase between the currents in its two energizing circuits. Then when the desired speed is attained, if the lever P be shifted upon con[Pg 98]tact n the entire current will pass through the field coils of the synchronizing motor and the other will be doing no work.

A practical setup for implementing this invention is shown in Fig. 80, where J J represent the field coils of the synchronizing motor, and H I are the field coils of the torque motor. L L' are the conductors of the main line. One end of the coils H connects to wire L via a self-induction coil M. One end of the other coils I connects to the same wire through a dead resistance N. The other ends of these two circuits link to the contact m of a switch, which has a handle or lever connected to the line-wire L'. One end of the field circuit for the synchronizing motor is connected to wire L, while the other ends at the switch contact n. From the diagram, it’s clear that if the lever P is turned to contact m, the torque motor will start due to the phase difference between the currents in its two energizing circuits. Then, when the desired speed is reached, if the lever P is moved to contact n, the entire current will flow through the field coils of the synchronizing motor, and the other circuit will stop working.

The torque motor may be constructed and operated in various ways, many of which have already been touched upon. It is not necessary that one motor be cut out of circuit while the other is in, for both may be acted upon by current at the same time, and Mr. Tesla has devised various dispositions or arrangements of the two motors for accomplishing this. Some of these arrangements are illustrated in Figs. 81 to 85.

The torque motor can be built and used in different ways, many of which have already been discussed. It's not required for one motor to be disconnected while the other is connected, as both can be powered by current simultaneously. Mr. Tesla has developed various setups or configurations for the two motors to achieve this. Some of these setups are shown in Figs. 81 to 85.

Fig. 80. Fig. 80.

Referring to Fig. 81, let T designate the torque or multiple circuit motor and S the synchronizing motor, L L' being the line-wires from a source of alternating current. The two circuits of the torque motor of different degrees of self-induction, and designated by N M, are connected in derivation to the wire L. They are then joined and connected to the energizing circuit of the synchronizing motor, the opposite terminal of which is connected to wire L'. The two motors are thus in series. To start them Mr. Tesla short-circuits the synchronizing motor by a switch P', throwing the whole current through the torque motor. Then when the desired speed is reached the switch P' is opened, so that the current passes through both motors. In such an arrangement as this it is obviously desirable for economical and other reasons that a proper relation between the speeds of the two motors should be observed.

Referring to Fig. 81, let T represent the torque or multiple circuit motor and S the synchronizing motor, with L L' being the line wires from a source of alternating current. The two circuits of the torque motor, which have different levels of self-induction and are labeled N M, are connected in parallel to the wire L. They are then linked to the energizing circuit of the synchronizing motor, whose opposite terminal is connected to wire L'. This means the two motors are in series. To start them, Mr. Tesla short-circuits the synchronizing motor using a switch P', allowing the entire current to flow through the torque motor. Once the desired speed is reached, the switch P' is opened, so that the current flows through both motors. In this setup, it’s clearly important for efficient operation and other reasons that there is a proper relationship between the speeds of the two motors.

In Fig. 82 another disposition is illustrated. S is the synchronizing motor and T the torque motor, the circuits of both being in parallel. W is a circuit also in derivation to the motor circuits and containing a switch P''. S' is a switch in the synchronizing motor circuit. On the start the switch S' is opened, cutting out the motor S. Then P'' is opened, throwing the entire current[Pg 99] through the motor T, giving it a very strong torque. When the desired speed is reached, switch S' is closed and the current divides between both motors. By means of switch P'' both motors may be cut out.

In Fig. 82, another setup is shown. S is the synchronizing motor and T is the torque motor, with both circuits in parallel. W is another circuit that branches off to the motor circuits and contains a switch P''. S' is a switch in the synchronizing motor circuit. At the start, switch S' is opened, cutting off motor S. Then P'' is opened, sending the full current[Pg 99] through motor T, which provides a strong torque. When the desired speed is reached, switch S' is closed, and the current is split between both motors. Using switch P'', both motors can be turned off.

Fig. 81, 82, 83, 84 and 85. Figures. 81, 82, 83, 84, and 85.

In Fig. 83 the arrangement is substantially the same, except that a switch T' is placed in the circuit which includes the two circuits of the torque motor. Fig. 84 shows the two motors in series, with a shunt around both containing a switch S T. There is also a shunt around the synchronizing motor S, with a switch P'. In Fig. 85 the same disposition is shown; but each motor is provided with a shunt, in which are switches P' and T'', as shown.

In Fig. 83, the setup is basically the same, except that a switch T' is added to the circuit that includes both circuits of the torque motor. Fig. 84 displays the two motors connected in series, with a bypass around both that has a switch S T. There's also a bypass around the synchronizing motor S, which has a switch P'. In Fig. 85, the same configuration is illustrated, but each motor has its own bypass, containing switches P' and T'', as depicted.


CHAPTER XXI.

Motor with a Capacitor in the Armature Circuit.

We now come to a new class of motors in which resort is had to condensers for the purpose of developing the required difference of phase and neutralizing the effects of self-induction. Mr. Tesla early began to apply the condenser to alternating apparatus, in just how many ways can only be learned from a perusal of other portions of this volume, especially those dealing with his high frequency work.

We now turn to a new type of motors that use condensers to create the necessary phase difference and reduce the effects of self-induction. Mr. Tesla started using the condenser with alternating devices, and the various ways he applied it can be found by reading other sections of this book, especially those focused on his high-frequency work.

Certain laws govern the action or effects produced by a condenser when connected to an electric circuit through which an alternating or in general an undulating current is made to pass. Some of the most important of such effects are as follows: First, if the terminals or plates of a condenser be connected with two points of a circuit, the potentials of which are made to rise and fall in rapid succession, the condenser allows the passage, or more strictly speaking, the transference of a current, although its plates or armatures may be so carefully insulated as to prevent almost completely the passage of a current of unvarying strength or direction and of moderate electromotive force. Second, if a circuit, the terminals of which are connected with the plates of the condenser, possess a certain self-induction, the condenser will overcome or counteract to a greater or less degree, dependent upon well-understood conditions, the effects of such self-induction. Third, if two points of a closed or complete circuit through which a rapidly rising and falling current flows be shunted or bridged by a condenser, a variation in the strength of the currents in the branches and also a difference of phase of the currents therein is produced. These effects Mr. Tesla has utilized and applied in a variety of ways in the construction and operation of his motors, such as by producing a difference in phase in the two energizing circuits of an alternating current motor by connecting the two circuits in derivation and connecting up a condenser in series in one of the circuits. A further development, [Pg 102]however, possesses certain novel features of practical value and involves a knowledge of facts less generally understood. It comprises the use of a condenser or condensers in connection with the induced or armature circuit of a motor and certain details of the construction of such motors. In an alternating current motor of the type particularly referred to above, or in any other which has an armature coil or circuit closed upon itself, the latter represents not only an inductive resistance, but one which is period[Pg 103]ically varying in value, both of which facts complicate and render difficult the attainment of the conditions best suited to the most efficient working conditions; in other words, they require, first, that for a given inductive effect upon the armature there should be the greatest possible current through the armature or induced coils, and, second, that there should always exist between the currents in the energizing and the induced circuits a given relation of phase. Hence whatever tends to decrease the self-induction and increase the current in the induced circuits will, other things being equal, increase the output and efficiency of the motor, and the same will be true of causes that operate to maintain the mutual attractive effect between the field magnets and armature at its maximum. Mr. Tesla secures these results by connecting with the induced circuit or circuits a condenser, in the manner described below, and he also, with this purpose in view, constructs the motor in a special manner.

Certain laws dictate how a condenser acts or the effects it produces when connected to an electric circuit carrying an alternating or generally undulating current. Some of the key effects are as follows: First, if the terminals or plates of a condenser are linked to two points in a circuit where the potentials quickly rise and fall, the condenser permits the flow, or more accurately, the transfer of current, even if its plates or components are carefully insulated to almost completely prevent the flow of a steady current of moderate voltage. Second, if a circuit, connected to the condenser's plates, has a certain level of self-induction, the condenser will counteract, to varying degrees depending on specific conditions, the effects of that self-induction. Third, if two points in a closed or complete circuit that has a rapidly fluctuating current are connected by a condenser, there will be a change in the strength of the currents in the branches and also a phase difference between those currents. Mr. Tesla has used and applied these effects in various ways when building and operating his motors. For instance, he produces a phase difference in the two energizing circuits of an alternating current motor by connecting the two circuits derivatively and adding a condenser in series in one of the circuits. A further development, however, includes some innovative features of practical value and requires understanding less commonly known facts. It involves using one or more condensers with the induced or armature circuit of a motor and specific construction details of those motors. In an alternating current motor of the type mentioned above, or any that has an armature coil or circuit closed upon itself, that circuit represents not only inductive resistance but also a resistance that varies periodically, complicating and making it challenging to achieve conditions that lead to the most efficient functioning. In other words, they need, first, that for a particular inductive effect on the armature, there should be the highest possible current through the armature or induced coils, and, second, there should always be a specific phase relationship between the currents in the energizing and induced circuits. Thus, anything that reduces self-induction and increases current in the induced circuits will, other factors being equal, boost the motor's output and efficiency. The same applies to factors that maintain maximum mutual attraction between the field magnets and armature. Mr. Tesla achieves these results by connecting a condenser with the induced circuit or circuits, as described below, and he also designs the motor in a unique way for this purpose.

Fig. 86. Fig. 86.
Fig. 88, 89.
Fig. 88.Fig. 89.
Fig. 87. Fig. 87.
Fig. 90. Fig. 90.

Referring to the drawings, Fig. 86, is a view, mainly diagrammatic, of an alternating current motor, in which the present principle is applied. Fig. 87 is a central section, in line with the shaft, of a special form of armature core. Fig. 88 is a similar section of a modification of the same. Fig. 89 is one of the sections of the core detached. Fig. 90 is a diagram showing a modified disposition of the armature or induced circuits.

Referring to the drawings, Fig. 86 shows a mostly diagrammatic view of an alternating current motor where the current principle is applied. Fig. 87 is a central section, aligned with the shaft, of a special type of armature core. Fig. 88 is a similar section of a variation of the same. Fig. 89 shows one of the detached sections of the core. Fig. 90 is a diagram illustrating a modified arrangement of the armature or induced circuits.

The general plan of the invention is illustrated in Fig. 86. A A in this figure represent the the frame and field magnets of an alternating current motor, the poles or projections of which are wound with coils B and C, forming independent energizing circuits connected either to the same or to independent sources of alternating currents, so that the currents flowing through the circuits, respectively, will have a difference of phase. Within the influence of this field is an armature core D, wound with coils E. In motors of this description heretofore these coils have been closed upon themselves, or connected in a closed series; but in the present case each coil or the connected series of coils terminates in the opposite plates of a condenser F. For this purpose the ends of the series of coils are brought out through the shaft to collecting rings G, which are connected to the condenser by contact brushes H and suitable conductors, the condenser being independent of the machine. The armature coils are wound or connected in such manner that adjacent coils produce opposite poles.[Pg 104]

The overall design of the invention is shown in Fig. 86. A A in this figure represent the frame and field magnets of an alternating current motor, whose poles or projections are wrapped with coils B and C, creating separate energizing circuits linked to either the same or different sources of alternating currents, ensuring that the currents flowing through the circuits have a phase difference. Within this magnetic field is an armature core D, wrapped with coils E. In previous motors of this kind, these coils have been closed on themselves or connected in a closed loop; however, in this case, each coil or the series of connected coils ends at opposite plates of a condenser F. For this, the ends of the series of coils are routed through the shaft to collecting rings G, which are connected to the condenser by contact brushes H and appropriate conductors, with the condenser being separate from the machine. The armature coils are wound or connected in such a way that adjacent coils create opposite poles.[Pg 104]

The action of this motor and the effect of the plan followed in its construction are as follows: The motor being started in operation and the coils of the field magnets being traversed by alternating currents, currents are induced in the armature coils by one set of field coils, as B, and the poles thus established are acted upon by the other set, as C. The armature coils, however, have necessarily a high self-induction, which opposes the flow of the currents thus set up. The condenser F not only permits the passage or transference of these currents, but also counteracts the effects of self-induction, and by a proper adjustment of the capacity of the condenser, the self-induction of the coils, and the periods of the currents, the condenser may be made to overcome entirely the effect of self-induction.

The operation of this motor and the effects of its design are as follows: When the motor starts running and the coils of the field magnets are energized by alternating currents, one set of field coils, like B, induces currents in the armature coils, while another set, like C, interacts with the poles created. However, the armature coils have a high level of self-induction, which resists the flow of the currents generated. The condenser F not only allows these currents to flow but also counteracts the effects of self-induction. By adjusting the capacity of the condenser, the self-induction of the coils, and the timing of the currents, the condenser can completely mitigate the impact of self-induction.

It is preferable on account of the undesirability of using sliding contacts of any kind, to associate the condenser with the armature directly, or make it a part of the armature. In some cases Mr. Tesla builds up the armature of annular plates K K, held by bolts L between heads M, which are secured to the driving shaft, and in the hollow space thus formed he places a condenser F, generally by winding the two insulated plates spirally around the shaft. In other cases he utilizes the plates of the core itself as the plates of the condenser. For example, in Figs. 88 and 89, N is the driving shaft, M M are the heads of the armature-core, and K K' the iron plates of which the core is built up. These plates are insulated from the shaft and from one another, and are held together by rods or bolts L. The bolts pass through a large hole in one plate and a small hole in the one next adjacent, and so on, connecting electrically all of plates K, as one armature of a condenser, and all of plates K' as the other.

It’s better to avoid using sliding contacts of any kind, so it's recommended to connect the condenser directly to the armature or to make it part of the armature. In some cases, Mr. Tesla constructs the armature from circular plates K K, secured with bolts L between ends M, which are attached to the driving shaft. In the space created, he places a condenser F, usually by winding two insulated plates in a spiral around the shaft. In other instances, he uses the core plates themselves as the condenser plates. For example, in Figs. 88 and 89, N represents the driving shaft, M M are the ends of the armature core, and K K' are the iron plates forming the core. These plates are insulated from the shaft and from each other, held together by rods or bolts L. The bolts go through a large hole in one plate and a smaller hole in the adjacent one, connecting all the plates K electrically as one armature of a condenser, and all the plates K' as the other.

To either of the condensers above described the armature coils may be connected, as explained by reference to Fig. 86.

To either of the condensers mentioned above, the armature coils can be connected, as explained with reference to Fig. 86.

In motors in which the armature coils are closed upon themselves—as, for example, in any form of alternating current motor in which one armature coil or set of coils is in the position of maximum induction with respect to the field coils or poles, while the other is in the position of minimum induction—the coils are best connected in one series, and two points of the circuit thus formed are bridged by a condenser. This is illustrated in Fig. 90, in which E represents one set of armature coils and E' the other. Their points of union are joined through a condenser F. It will be observed that in this disposition the self[Pg 105]-induction of the two branches E and E' varies with their position relatively to the field magnet, and that each branch is alternately the predominating source of the induced current. Hence the effect of the condenser F is twofold. First, it increases the current in each of the branches alternately, and, secondly, it alters the phase of the currents in the branches, this being the well-known effect which results from such a disposition of a condenser with a circuit, as above described. This effect is favorable to the proper working of the motor, because it increases the flow of current in the armature circuits due to a given inductive effect, and also because it brings more nearly into coincidence the maximum magnetic effects of the coacting field and armature poles.

In motors where the armature coils loop back on themselves—like in any type of alternating current motor where one set of coils is at a point of maximum induction relative to the field coils or poles, while the other set is at a point of minimum induction—it's best to connect the coils in series, and a condenser bridges two points of the circuit formed. This is shown in Fig. 90, where E represents one set of armature coils and E' represents the other. Their connection points are linked through a condenser F. You'll notice that in this setup, the self-induction of the two branches E and E' changes depending on their position relative to the field magnet, and each branch alternates as the primary source of the induced current. Therefore, the condenser F has two effects. First, it boosts the current in each branch alternately, and second, it shifts the phase of the currents in the branches, which is the well-known effect that occurs with this arrangement of a condenser and a circuit, as described above. This effect benefits the motor's performance because it enhances the current flow in the armature circuits due to a certain inductive effect, and it also aligns the maximum magnetic effects of the interacting field and armature poles more closely.

It will be understood, of course, that the causes that contribute to the efficiency of condensers when applied to such uses as the above must be given due consideration in determining the practicability and efficiency of the motors. Chief among these is, as is well known, the periodicity of the current, and hence the improvements described are more particularly adapted to systems in which a very high rate of alternation or change is maintained.

It's important to understand that the factors affecting the efficiency of condensers in applications like these need to be carefully considered when evaluating the practicality and effectiveness of the motors. The main factor, as is widely recognized, is the frequency of the current, which means the improvements mentioned are especially suited for systems that maintain a very high rate of alternation or change.

Although this invention has been illustrated in connection with a special form of motor, it will be understood that it is equally applicable to any other alternating current motor in which there is a closed armature coil wherein the currents are induced by the action of the field, and the feature of utilizing the plates or sections of a magnetic core for forming the condenser is applicable, generally, to other kinds of alternating current apparatus.

Although this invention has been shown using a specific type of motor, it should be clear that it can also be applied to any other alternating current motor that has a closed armature coil where the currents are induced by the field's action. The use of plates or sections of a magnetic core to create the condenser is also applicable to other types of alternating current equipment.


CHAPTER XXII.

Motor with Condenser in one of the Field Circuits.

If the field or energizing circuits of a rotary phase motor be both derived from the same source of alternating currents and a condenser of proper capacity be included in one of the same, approximately, the desired difference of phase may be obtained between the currents flowing directly from the source and those flowing through the condenser; but the great size and expense of condensers for this purpose that would meet the requirements of the ordinary systems of comparatively low potential are particularly prohibitory to their employment.

If the field or energizing circuits of a rotary phase motor come from the same alternating current source, and if a properly sized condenser is included in one of them, you can achieve the desired phase difference between the currents coming directly from the source and those passing through the condenser. However, the large size and cost of condensers needed for this purpose, which would work with standard lower voltage systems, make their use particularly impractical.

Another, now well-known, method or plan of securing a difference of phase between the energizing currents of motors of this kind is to induce by the currents in one circuit those in the other circuit or circuits; but as no means had been proposed that would secure in this way between the phases of the primary or inducing and the secondary or induced currents that difference—theoretically ninety degrees—that is best adapted for practical and economical working, Mr. Tesla devised a means which renders practicable both the above described plans or methods, and by which he is enabled to obtain an economical and efficient alternating current motor. His invention consists in placing a condenser in the secondary or induced circuit of the motor above described and raising the potential of the secondary currents to such a degree that the capacity of the condenser, which is in part dependent on the potential, need be quite small. The value of this condenser is determined in a well-understood manner with reference to the self-induction and other conditions of the circuit, so as to cause the currents which pass through it to differ from the primary currents by a quarter phase.

Another now well-known method for creating a phase difference between the energizing currents of these types of motors is to have the currents in one circuit induce currents in the other circuit or circuits. However, until now, no method has been suggested that would create the ideal phase difference— theoretically ninety degrees—between the primary or inducing currents and the secondary or induced currents, optimized for practical and economical use. Mr. Tesla came up with a solution that effectively combines both of the previously mentioned plans or methods, allowing him to develop an efficient and cost-effective alternating current motor. His invention involves placing a capacitor in the secondary or induced circuit of the aforementioned motor and increasing the potential of the secondary currents to such a level that the size of the capacitor, which partly depends on the potential, can be relatively small. The value of this capacitor is determined in a well-established way, considering the self-induction and other factors of the circuit, so that the currents passing through it are a quarter phase out of sync with the primary currents.

Fig. 91 illustrates the invention as embodied in a motor in which the inductive relation of the primary and secondary circuits is secured by winding them inside the motor partly upon the same cores; but the invention applies, generally, to[Pg 107] other forms of motor in which one of the energizing currents is induced in any way from the other.

Fig. 91 shows the invention as implemented in a motor where the inductive relationship between the primary and secondary circuits is achieved by winding them partly on the same cores inside the motor; however, the invention generally applies to[Pg 107] other types of motors where one of the energizing currents is induced from the other in any manner.

Let A B represent the poles of an alternating current motor, of which C is the armature wound with coils D, closed upon themselves, as is now the general practice in motors of this kind. The poles A, which alternate with poles B, are wound with coils of ordinary or coarse wire E in such direction as to make them of alternate north and south polarity, as indicated in the diagram by the characters N S. Over these coils, or in other inductive relation to the same, are wound long fine-wire coils F F, and in the same direction throughout as the coils E. These coils are secondaries, in which currents of very high potential are induced. All the coils E in one series are connected, and all the secondaries F in another.

Let A B represent the poles of an alternating current motor, where C is the armature wrapped with coils D, closed upon themselves, as is now the usual practice in motors like this. The poles A, which alternate with poles B, are wrapped with coils of regular or coarse wire E in a way that gives them alternating north and south polarity, as indicated in the diagram by the characters N S. Over these coils, or in another inductive relationship with them, are wrapped long fine-wire coils F F, and they are all in the same direction as the coils E. These coils are secondary, where currents of very high potential are induced. All the coils E in one series are connected, and all the secondaries F in another.

Fig. 91. Fig. 91.

On the intermediate poles B are wound fine-wire energizing coils G, which are connected in series with one another, and also with the series of secondary coils F, the direction of winding being such that a current-impulse induced from the primary coils E imparts the same magnetism to the poles B as that produced[Pg 108] in poles A by the primary impulse. This condition is indicated by the characters N' S'.

On the intermediate poles B, fine-wire energizing coils G are wound, connected in series with each other and also with the series of secondary coils F. The winding direction is such that a current impulse induced from the primary coils E gives the same magnetism to the poles B as that created in poles A by the primary impulse. This condition is represented by the characters N' S'.

In the circuit formed by the two sets of coils F and G is introduced a condenser H; otherwise this circuit is closed upon itself, while the free ends of the circuit of coils E are connected to a source of alternating currents. As the condenser capacity which is needed in any particular motor of this kind is dependent upon the rate of alternation or the potential, or both, its size or cost, as before explained, may be brought within economical limits for use with the ordinary circuits if the potential of the secondary circuit in the motor be sufficiently high. By giving to the condenser proper values, any desired difference of phase between the primary and secondary energizing circuits may be obtained.

In the circuit created by the two sets of coils F and G, a capacitor H is added; otherwise, this circuit is closed on itself, while the free ends of the coil circuit E are connected to a source of alternating current. The required capacitor size for any specific motor of this type depends on the frequency of alternation, the voltage, or both. Its size or cost, as previously explained, can be kept within economical limits for use with standard circuits if the voltage of the motor’s secondary circuit is high enough. By assigning proper values to the capacitor, any desired phase difference between the primary and secondary energizing circuits can be achieved.


CHAPTER XXIII.

Tesla Polyphase Transformer.

Applying the polyphase principle to the construction of transformers as well to the motors already noticed, Mr. Tesla has invented some very interesting forms, which he considers free from the defects of earlier and, at present, more familiar forms. In these transformers he provides a series of inducing coils and corresponding induced coils, which are generally wound upon a core closed upon itself, usually a ring of laminated iron.

Applying the polyphase principle to the design of transformers and the motors mentioned earlier, Mr. Tesla has created some very interesting types that he believes are free from the flaws of earlier and currently more common designs. In these transformers, he includes a series of inducing coils and their corresponding induced coils, which are typically wound around a core that is closed on itself, usually in the form of a laminated iron ring.

The two sets of coils are wound side by side or superposed or otherwise placed in well-known ways to bring them into the most effective relations to one another and to the core. The inducing or primary coils wound on the core are divided into pairs or sets by the proper electrical connections, so that while the coils of one pair or set co-operate in fixing the magnetic poles of the core at two given diametrically opposite points, the coils of the other pair or set—assuming, for sake of illustration, that there are but two—tend to fix the poles ninety degrees from such points. With this induction device is used an alternating current generator with coils or sets of coils to correspond with those of the converter, and the corresponding coils of the generator and converter are then connected up in independent circuits. It results from this that the different electrical phases in the generator are attended by corresponding magnetic changes in the converter; or, in other words, that as the generator coils revolve, the points of greatest magnetic intensity in the converter will be progressively shifted or whirled around.

The two sets of coils are positioned side by side or stacked in familiar ways to create the most effective relationships with each other and the core. The primary coils wrapped around the core are divided into pairs or sets through specific electrical connections, so that while the coils in one pair or set work together to establish the magnetic poles of the core at two directly opposite points, the coils in the other pair or set—assuming, for example, that there are just two—help set the poles ninety degrees from those points. This induction device uses an alternating current generator with coils or sets of coils that match those of the converter, and the matching coils of the generator and converter are connected in separate circuits. As a result, the different electrical phases in the generator lead to corresponding magnetic changes in the converter; in other words, as the generator coils turn, the points of highest magnetic intensity in the converter will be continuously shifted or rotated.

Fig. 92 is a diagrammatic illustration of the converter and the electrical connections of the same. Fig. 93 is a horizontal central cross-section of Fig. 92. Fig. 94 is a diagram of the circuits of the entire system, the generator being shown in section.

Fig. 92 is a diagram showing the converter and its electrical connections. Fig. 93 is a horizontal central cross-section of Fig. 92. Fig. 94 is a diagram of the entire system's circuits, with the generator displayed in section.

Fig. 92 and 93. Figs 92 and 93.

Mr. Tesla uses a core, A, which is closed upon itself—that is to say, of an annular cylindrical or equivalent form—and as the efficiency of the apparatus is largely increased by the subdivision[Pg 110] of this core, he makes it of thin strips, plates, or wires of soft iron electrically insulated as far as practicable. Upon this core are wound, say, four coils, B B B' B', used as primary coils, and for which long lengths of comparatively fine wire are employed. Over these coils are then wound shorter coils of coarser wire, C C C' C', to constitute the induced or secondary coils. The construction of this or any equivalent form of converter may be carried further, as above pointed out, by inclosing these coils with iron—as, for example, by winding over the coils layers of insulated iron wire.

Mr. Tesla uses a core, A, that’s shaped like a closed loop—specifically, an annular cylinder or something similar—and since the efficiency of the device is greatly improved by breaking this core into smaller pieces[Pg 110], he creates it from thin strips, plates, or wires of soft iron that are electrically insulated as much as possible. Around this core, he winds four coils, B B B' B', which serve as primary coils, using long lengths of relatively fine wire. Over these coils, he then winds shorter coils made of thicker wire, C C C' C', which form the induced or secondary coils. The construction of this or any similar type of converter can be enhanced, as mentioned earlier, by enclosing these coils with iron—like, for instance, by wrapping layers of insulated iron wire around the coils.

Fig. 94. Fig. 94.

The device is provided with suitable binding posts, to which the ends of the coils are led. The diametrically opposite coils B B and B' B' are connected, respectively, in series, and the four terminals are connected to the binding posts. The induced coils are connected together in any desired manner. For example, as shown in Fig. 94, C C may be connected in multiple arc when a quantity current is desired—as for running a group of incandescent lamps—while C' C' may be independently connected in series in a circuit including arc lamps or the like. The generator in this system will be adapted to the converter in the [Pg 111]manner illustrated. For example, in the present case there are employed a pair of ordinary permanent or electro-magnets, E E, between which is mounted a cylindrical armature on a shaft, F, and wound with two coils, G G'. The terminals of these coils are connected, respectively, to four insulated contact or collecting rings, H H H' H', and the four line circuit wires L connect the brushes K, bearing on these rings, to the converter in the order shown. Noting the results of this combination, it will be observed that at a given point of time the coil G is in its neutral position and is generating little or no current, while the other coil, G', is in a position where it exerts its maximum effect. Assuming coil G to be connected in circuit with coils B B of the converter, and coil G' with coils B' B', it is evident that the poles of the ring A will be determined by coils B' B' alone; but as the armature of the generator revolves, coil G develops more current and coil G' less, until G reaches its maximum and G' its neutral position. The obvious result will be to shift the poles of the ring A through one-quarter of its periphery. The movement of the coils through the next quarter of a turn—during which coil G' enters a field of opposite polarity and generates a current of opposite direction and increasing strength, while coil G, in passing from its maximum to its neutral position generates a current of decreasing strength and same direction as before—causes a further shifting of the poles through the second quarter of the ring. The second half-revolution will obviously be a repetition of the same action. By the shifting of the poles of the ring A, a power[Pg 112]ful dynamic inductive effect on the coils C C' is produced. Besides the currents generated in the secondary coils by dynamo-magnetic induction, other currents will be set up in the same coils in consequence of many variations in the intensity of the poles in the ring A. This should be avoided by maintaining the intensity of the poles constant, to accomplish which care should be taken in designing and proportioning the generator and in distributing the coils in the ring A, and balancing their effect. When this is done, the currents are produced by dynamo-magnetic induction only, the same result being obtained as though the poles were shifted by a commutator with an infinite number of segments.

The device comes with appropriate binding posts where the ends of the coils are connected. The coils located on opposite sides, B B and B' B', are linked in series, and the four terminals are attached to the binding posts. The induced coils can be connected in any preferred configuration. For instance, as illustrated in Fig. 94, C C can be connected in a multiple arc when a substantial current is needed—like for powering a set of incandescent lamps—while C' C' can be connected in series in a circuit that includes arc lamps or similar devices. The generator in this setup is designed to be compatible with the converter in the [Pg 111] manner shown. In this case, we use a pair of standard permanent or electro-magnets, E E, between which a cylindrical armature is mounted on a shaft, F, and wrapped with two coils, G G'. The terminals of these coils are linked to four insulated contact or collecting rings, H H H' H', and the four line circuit wires L connect the brushes K, which press against these rings, to the converter in the order displayed. Observing the outcomes of this combination, it becomes clear that at a certain moment, coil G is in its neutral position and generates little to no current, while the other coil, G', is positioned to exert its maximum effect. If coil G is connected to coils B B of the converter, and coil G' is linked to coils B' B', it is clear that the poles of the ring A will be determined solely by coils B' B'; however, as the generator's armature rotates, coil G produces more current while coil G' produces less, until G reaches its maximum and G' reaches its neutral position. The obvious outcome will be a shift of the poles of ring A by a quarter of its circumference. The next quarter turn—during which coil G' enters a field of opposite polarity and generates a current of opposite direction and increasing strength, while coil G transitions from its maximum to its neutral position, generating a current of decreasing strength in the same direction as before—will further shift the poles during the second quarter of the ring. The second half revolution will clearly repeat the same process. By shifting the poles of the ring A, a powerful dynamic inductive effect on the coils C C' is generated. In addition to the currents produced in the secondary coils by dynamo-magnetic induction, other currents will be induced in the same coils due to various changes in the intensity of the poles in ring A. This should be prevented by keeping the pole intensity constant, which requires careful design and proportioning of the generator and distribution of the coils in the ring A, balancing their effects. When this is achieved, the currents are produced solely by dynamo-magnetic induction, resulting in the same effect as if the poles were shifted by a commutator with an infinite number of segments.

The modifications which are applicable to other forms of converter are in many respects applicable to this, such as those pertaining more particularly to the form of the core, the relative lengths and resistances of the primary and secondary coils, and the arrangements for running or operating the same.

The changes that apply to other types of converters also apply to this one in many ways, such as those related specifically to the shape of the core, the relative lengths and resistances of the primary and secondary coils, and the setups for running or operating them.


CHAPTER XXIV.

A Constant Current Transformer with Magnetic Shielding Between the Primary and Secondary Coils.

Mr. Tesla has applied his principle of magnetic shielding of parts to the construction also of transformers, the shield being interposed between the primary and secondary coils. In transformers of the ordinary type it will be found that the wave of electromotive force of the secondary very nearly coincides with that of the primary, being, however, in opposite sign. At the same time the currents, both primary and secondary, lag behind their respective electromotive forces; but as this lag is practically or nearly the same in the case of each it follows that the maximum and minimum of the primary and secondary currents will nearly coincide, but differ in sign or direction, provided the secondary be not loaded or if it contain devices having the property of self-induction. On the other hand, the lag of the primary behind the impressed electromotive force may be diminished by loading the secondary with a non-inductive or dead resistance—such as incandescent lamps—whereby the time interval between the maximum or minimum periods of the primary and secondary currents is increased. This time interval, however, is limited, and the results obtained by phase difference in the operation of such devices as the Tesla alternating current motors can only be approximately realized by such means of producing or securing this difference, as above indicated, for it is desirable in such cases that there should exist between the primary and secondary currents, or those which, however produced, pass through the two circuits of the motor, a difference of phase of ninety degrees; or, in other words, the current in one circuit should be a maximum when that in the other circuit is a minimum. To attain to this condition more perfectly, an increased retardation of the secondary current is secured in the following manner: Instead of bringing the primary and secondary coils or circuits of a transformer into the closest possible relations, as has hitherto[Pg 114] been done, Mr. Tesla protects in a measure the secondary from the inductive action or effect of the primary by surrounding either the primary or the secondary with a comparatively thin magnetic shield or screen. Under these modified conditions, as long as the primary current has a small value, the shield protects the secondary; but as soon as the primary current has reached a certain strength, which is arbitrarily determined, the protecting magnetic shield becomes saturated and the inductive action upon the secondary begins. It results, therefore, that the secondary current begins to flow at a certain fraction of a period later than it would without the interposed shield, and since this retardation may be obtained without necessarily retarding the primary current also, an additional lag is secured, and the time interval between the maximum or minimum periods of the primary and secondary currents is increased. Such a transformer may, by properly proportioning its several elements and determining the proper relations between the primary and secondary windings, the thickness of the magnetic shield, and other conditions, be constructed to yield a constant current at all loads.

Mr. Tesla has applied his principle of magnetic shielding to the design of transformers, with the shield placed between the primary and secondary coils. In typical transformers, the electromotive force (EMF) wave of the secondary coil closely matches that of the primary coil, but with opposite polarity. At the same time, both the primary and secondary currents lag behind their respective EMFs; since this lag is nearly the same for each, it leads to the maximum and minimum of the primary and secondary currents aligning in time, but differing in direction, as long as the secondary is not loaded or contains devices that exhibit self-induction. However, the lag of the primary can be reduced by loading the secondary with a non-inductive or resistive load, such as light bulbs, which increases the time interval between the peaks or valleys of the primary and secondary currents. This time interval is limited, and achieving the phase difference necessary for devices like Tesla's alternating current motors can only be approximated with this method. Ideally, there should be a ninety-degree phase difference between the primary and secondary currents, meaning one current reaches its peak when the other is at its lowest. To better achieve this condition, Tesla ensures that the secondary current is more delayed by not placing the primary and secondary coils in the closest relation possible, as previously done. Instead, he partially shields the secondary from the primary's inductive effects by surrounding either the primary or secondary with a relatively thin magnetic shield. Under these modified conditions, as long as the primary current is low, the shield protects the secondary; but once the primary current reaches a predetermined strength, the magnetic shield becomes saturated, and the inductive effect on the secondary starts. Consequently, the secondary current begins to flow at a fraction of a period later than it would without the shield, and since this delay can occur without affecting the primary current, an additional lag is introduced, increasing the time interval between the maximum and minimum currents of both the primary and secondary. Such a transformer can be designed to provide a consistent current across various loads by properly adjusting its components, including the primary and secondary windings, the thickness of the magnetic shield, and other factors.

Fig. 95. Fig. 95.

Fig. 95 is a cross-section of a transformer embodying this improvement. Fig. 96 is a similar view of a modified form of transformer, showing diagrammatically the manner of using the same.

Fig. 95 is a cross-section of a transformer that includes this improvement. Fig. 96 is a similar view of a modified version of the transformer, illustrating how it is used.

A A is the main core of the transformer, composed of a ring of soft annealed and insulated or oxidized iron wire. Upon this core is wound the secondary circuit or coil B B. This latter is then covered with a layer or layers of annealed and insulated iron wires C C, wound in a direction at right angles to the secondary[Pg 115] coil. Over the whole is then wound the primary coil or wire D D. From the nature of this construction it will be obvious that as long as the shield formed by the wires C is below magnetic saturation the secondary coil or circuit is effectually protected or shielded from the inductive influence of the primary, although on open circuit it may exhibit some electromotive force. When the strength of the primary reaches a certain value, the shield C, becoming saturated, ceases to protect the secondary from inductive action, and current is in consequence developed therein. For similar reasons, when the primary current weakens, the weakening of the secondary is retarded to the same or approximately the same extent.

A A is the main part of the transformer, made up of a ring of soft-annealed and insulated or oxidized iron wire. Around this core, the secondary circuit or coil B B is wound. This coil is then covered with one or more layers of annealed and insulated iron wires C C, wrapped in a direction perpendicular to the secondary coil. Over everything, the primary coil or wire D D is wound. Given this setup, it’s clear that as long as the shield formed by the wires C is below magnetic saturation, the secondary coil or circuit is effectively protected from the inductive influence of the primary, although it may still show some electromotive force when on an open circuit. When the strength of the primary reaches a certain level, the shield C becomes saturated and stops protecting the secondary from inductive action, causing current to develop in it. For similar reasons, when the primary current weakens, the reduction in the secondary is slowed down to a similar extent.

Fig. 96. Fig. 96.

The specific construction of the transformer is largely immaterial. In Fig. 96, for example, the core A is built up of thin insulated iron plates or discs. The primary circuit D is wound next the core A. Over this is applied the shield C, which in this case is made up of thin strips or plates of iron properly insulated and surrounding the primary, forming a closed magnetic circuit. The secondary B is wound over the shield C. In Fig. 96, also, E is a source of alternating or rapidly changing currents. The primary of the transformer is connected with the circuit of the generator. F is a two-circuit alternating current motor, one of the circuits being connected with the main circuit from the source E, and the other being supplied with currents from the secondary of the transformer.

The specific design of the transformer is mostly irrelevant. In Fig. 96, for instance, the core A is made up of thin insulated iron plates or discs. The primary circuit D is wound next to the core A. On top of this is the shield C, which in this case consists of thin strips or plates of properly insulated iron surrounding the primary, creating a closed magnetic circuit. The secondary B is wound over the shield C. In Fig. 96, E represents a source of alternating or rapidly changing currents. The primary of the transformer is connected to the generator's circuit. F is a two-circuit alternating current motor, with one circuit connected to the main circuit from the source E, and the other receiving current from the secondary of the transformer.


PART II.

THE TESLA EFFECTS WITH HIGH FREQUENCY
AND HIGH POTENTIAL CURRENTS.


CHAPTER XXV.

Introduction.—The Purpose of the Tesla Lectures.

Before proceeding to study the three Tesla lectures here presented, the reader may find it of some assistance to have his attention directed to the main points of interest and significance therein. The first of these lectures was delivered in New York, at Columbia College, before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, May 20, 1891. The urgent desire expressed immediately from all parts of Europe for an opportunity to witness the brilliant and unusual experiments with which the lecture was accompanied, induced Mr. Tesla to go to England early in 1892, when he appeared before the Institution of Electrical Engineers, and a day later, by special request, before the Royal Institution. His reception was of the most enthusiastic and flattering nature on both occasions. He then went, by invitation, to France, and repeated his novel demonstrations before the Société Internationale des Electriciens, and the Société Française de Physique. Mr. Tesla returned to America in the fall of 1892, and in February, 1893, delivered his third lecture before the Franklin Institute of Philadelphia, in fulfilment of a long standing promise to Prof. Houston. The following week, at the request of President James I. Ayer, of the National Electric Light Association, the same lecture was re-delivered in St. Louis. It had been intended to limit the invitations to members, but the appeals from residents in the city were so numerous and pressing that it became necessary to secure a very large hall. Hence it came about that the lecture was listened to by an audience of over 5,000 people, and was in some parts of a more popular nature than either of its predecessors. Despite this concession to the need of the hour and occasion, Mr. Tesla did not hesitate to show many new and brilliant experiments, and to advance the frontier of discovery far beyond any point he had theretofore marked publicly.

Before diving into the three Tesla lectures presented here, it may be helpful for the reader to focus on the main points of interest and significance. The first lecture was given in New York at Columbia College before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers on May 20, 1891. The overwhelming demand from all over Europe to witness the brilliant and unique experiments that accompanied the lecture prompted Mr. Tesla to travel to England in early 1892. There, he spoke before the Institution of Electrical Engineers, and a day later, at the Royal Institution upon special request. His reception was enthusiastic and flattering on both occasions. He was then invited to France, where he repeated his innovative demonstrations before the Société Internationale des Electriciens and the Société Française de Physique. Mr. Tesla returned to America in the fall of 1892, and in February 1893, delivered his third lecture at the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia, fulfilling a long-standing promise to Prof. Houston. The following week, at the request of President James I. Ayer of the National Electric Light Association, the same lecture was repeated in St. Louis. Initially, the invitations were meant for members only, but the overwhelming number of requests from local residents led to the necessity of securing a much larger venue. As a result, over 5,000 people attended the lecture, which was slightly more geared towards the general public than its predecessors. Despite this adjustment to meet the audience's needs, Mr. Tesla confidently showcased many new and impressive experiments and pushed the boundaries of discovery further than ever before.

We may now proceed to a running review of the lectures themselves. The ground covered by them is so vast that only the[Pg 120] leading ideas and experiments can here be touched upon; besides, it is preferable that the lectures should be carefully gone over for their own sake, it being more than likely that each student will discover a new beauty or stimulus in them. Taking up the course of reasoning followed by Mr. Tesla in his first lecture, it will be noted that he started out with the recognition of the fact, which he has now experimentally demonstrated, that for the production of light waves, primarily, electrostatic effects must be brought into play, and continued study has led him to the opinion that all electrical and magnetic effects may be referred to electrostatic molecular forces. This opinion finds a singular confirmation in one of the most striking experiments which he describes, namely, the production of a veritable flame by the agitation of electrostatically charged molecules. It is of the highest interest to observe that this result points out a way of obtaining a flame which consumes no material and in which no chemical action whatever takes place. It also throws a light on the nature of the ordinary flame, which Mr. Tesla believes to be due to electrostatic molecular actions, which, if true, would lead directly to the idea that even chemical affinities might be electrostatic in their nature and that, as has already been suggested, molecular forces in general may be referable to one and the same cause. This singular phenomenon accounts in a plausible manner for the unexplained fact that buildings are frequently set on fire during thunder storms without having been at all struck by lightning. It may also explain the total disappearance of ships at sea.

We can now move on to a review of the lectures themselves. The material covered is so extensive that we can only touch on the[Pg 120] main ideas and experiments; moreover, it's best for students to go through the lectures thoroughly on their own, as it's likely they will discover new insights or inspiration. Starting with the reasoning Mr. Tesla presents in his first lecture, he emphasizes the fact, which he has now proven through experiments, that to produce light waves, we must first activate electrostatic effects. Continued research has led him to conclude that all electrical and magnetic effects can be traced back to electrostatic molecular forces. This theory is notably supported by one of his most impressive experiments, where he creates an actual flame by agitating electrostatically charged molecules. It's extremely interesting to see that this result suggests a method for generating a flame that does not consume any material and involves no chemical reactions at all. It also sheds light on the nature of a regular flame, which Mr. Tesla believes is caused by electrostatic molecular actions. If true, this would imply that even chemical affinities could be electrostatic in nature and that, as has been previously noted, molecular forces in general may stem from a single source. This unusual phenomenon provides a plausible explanation for the curious occurrence of buildings catching fire during thunderstorms, even when they haven't been struck by lightning. It may also help to explain the complete disappearance of ships at sea.

One of the striking proofs of the correctness of the ideas advanced by Mr. Tesla is the fact that, notwithstanding the employment of the most powerful electromagnetic inductive effects, but feeble luminosity is obtainable, and this only in close proximity to the source of disturbance; whereas, when the electrostatic effects are intensified, the same initial energy suffices to excite luminosity at considerable distances from the source. That there are only electrostatic effects active seems to be clearly proved by Mr. Tesla's experiments with an induction coil operated with alternating currents of very high frequency. He shows how tubes may be made to glow brilliantly at considerable distances from any object when placed in a powerful, rapidly alternating, electrostatic field, and he describes many interesting phenomena observed in such a field. His experiments open up the possibility[Pg 121] of lighting an apartment by simply creating in it such an electrostatic field, and this, in a certain way, would appear to be the ideal method of lighting a room, as it would allow the illuminating device to be freely moved about. The power with which these exhausted tubes, devoid of any electrodes, light up is certainly remarkable.

One of the most convincing proofs of Mr. Tesla's ideas is that, despite using the strongest electromagnetic induction effects, only weak light can be produced, and this occurs only very close to the source of the disturbance. In contrast, when the electrostatic effects are increased, the same initial energy can create light at significant distances from the source. Mr. Tesla's experiments with an induction coil powered by very high frequency alternating currents clearly demonstrate that only electrostatic effects are active. He shows how tubes can glow brightly at considerable distances when placed in a powerful, rapidly alternating electrostatic field, and he notes many fascinating phenomena observed in such a field. His experiments suggest the possibility[Pg 121] of illuminating a room simply by creating such an electrostatic field, which would seem to be an ideal method for room lighting, as it would allow the light source to be easily moved around. The brightness of these electrode-less exhausted tubes is certainly impressive.

That the principle propounded by Mr. Tesla is a broad one is evident from the many ways in which it may be practically applied. We need only refer to the variety of the devices shown or described, all of which are novel in character and will, without doubt, lead to further important results at the hands of Mr. Tesla and other investigators. The experiment, for instance, of lighting up a single filament or block of refractory material with a single wire, is in itself sufficient to give Mr. Tesla's work the stamp of originality, and the numerous other experiments and effects which may be varied at will, are equally new and interesting. Thus, the incandescent filament spinning in an unexhausted globe, the well-known Crookes experiment on open circuit, and the many others suggested, will not fail to interest the reader. Mr. Tesla has made an exhaustive study of the various forms of the discharge presented by an induction coil when operated with these rapidly alternating currents, starting from the thread-like discharge and passing through various stages to the true electric flame.

The principle put forward by Mr. Tesla is broad, as is clear from the many ways it can be practically applied. We only need to look at the variety of devices shown or described, all of which are original and will likely lead to further significant results from Mr. Tesla and other researchers. For example, the experiment of lighting a single filament or block of resistant material with just one wire is enough to mark Mr. Tesla's work as unique, and the numerous other experiments and effects that can be varied are equally new and fascinating. Thus, the incandescent filament spinning in a vacuum-filled globe, the well-known Crookes experiment on an open circuit, and many other suggestions will certainly interest the reader. Mr. Tesla has thoroughly studied the different forms of discharge produced by an induction coil when run with these rapidly alternating currents, starting from the thin discharge and progressing through various stages to the true electric flame.

A point of great importance in the introduction of high tension alternating current which Mr. Tesla brings out is the necessity of carefully avoiding all gaseous matter in the high tension apparatus. He shows that, at least with very rapidly alternating currents of high potential, the discharge may work through almost any practicable thickness of the best insulators, if air is present. In such cases the air included within the apparatus is violently agitated and by molecular bombardment the parts may be so greatly heated as to cause a rupture of the insulation. The practical outcome of this is, that, whereas with steady currents, any kind of insulation may be used, with rapidly alternating currents oils will probably be the best to employ, a fact which has been observed, but not until now satisfactorily explained. The recognition of the above fact is of special importance in the construction of the costly commercial induction coils which are often rendered useless in an unaccountable manner. The truth of these views of Mr. Tesla is made evident by the in[Pg 122]teresting experiments illustrative of the behavior of the air between charged surfaces, the luminous streams formed by the charged molecules appearing even when great thicknesses of the best insulators are interposed between the charged surfaces. These luminous streams afford in themselves a very interesting study for the experimenter. With these rapidly alternating currents they become far more powerful and produce beautiful light effects when they issue from a wire, pinwheel or other object attached to a terminal of the coil; and it is interesting to note that they issue from a ball almost as freely as from a point, when the frequency is very high.

A key point that Mr. Tesla emphasizes in the introduction of high voltage alternating current is the need to completely avoid any gas in the high voltage equipment. He demonstrates that, at least with very fast alternating currents of high voltage, the discharge can pass through almost any thickness of even the best insulators if air is present. In these situations, the air inside the device gets violently disturbed, and through molecular collisions, the components can become so heated that it can rupture the insulation. The practical implication of this is that while steady currents can use any kind of insulation, rapidly alternating currents will likely work best with oils, a phenomenon that has been observed but previously not adequately explained. Recognizing this fact is especially important when building expensive commercial induction coils, which can often fail inexplicably. The validity of Mr. Tesla's insights is highlighted by fascinating experiments that demonstrate the behavior of air between charged surfaces, where luminous streams formed by the charged molecules are visible even when significant thicknesses of the best insulators are placed between the charged surfaces. These luminous streams, in themselves, provide a very intriguing area of study for experimenters. With these fast alternating currents, they become much more powerful and create stunning light effects when they emerge from a wire, pinwheel, or any other object connected to a terminal of the coil; interestingly, they emit from a sphere almost as easily as from a point when the frequency is very high.

From these experiments we also obtain a better idea of the importance of taking into account the capacity and self-induction in the apparatus employed and the possibilities offered by the use of condensers in conjunction with alternate currents, the employment of currents of high frequency, among other things, making it possible to reduce the condenser to practicable dimensions. Another point of interest and practical bearing is the fact, proved by Mr. Tesla, that for alternate currents, especially those of high frequency, insulators are required possessing a small specific inductive capacity, which at the same time have a high insulating power.

From these experiments, we also get a clearer understanding of the importance of considering the capacity and self-induction in the equipment used, as well as the potential benefits of using capacitors alongside alternating currents. The use of high-frequency currents, among other things, allows us to reduce the size of the capacitor to practical dimensions. Another noteworthy and practical aspect is the fact, demonstrated by Mr. Tesla, that for alternating currents, especially high-frequency ones, insulators are needed that have a low specific inductive capacity while also providing high insulating strength.

Mr. Tesla also makes interesting and valuable suggestion in regard to the economical utilization of iron in machines and transformers. He shows how, by maintaining by continuous magnetization a flow of lines through the iron, the latter may be kept near its maximum permeability and a higher output and economy may be secured in such apparatus. This principle may prove of considerable commercial importance in the development of alternating systems. Mr. Tesla's suggestion that the same result can be secured by heating the iron by hysteresis and eddy currents, and increasing the permeability in this manner, while it may appear less practical, nevertheless opens another direction for investigation and improvement.

Mr. Tesla also offers interesting and valuable suggestions regarding the efficient use of iron in machines and transformers. He demonstrates how keeping a continuous flow of magnetic lines through the iron maintains it near its maximum permeability, resulting in higher output and efficiency in such devices. This principle could be of significant commercial importance in the development of alternating systems. Mr. Tesla's idea that the same outcome can be achieved by heating the iron through hysteresis and eddy currents, thereby increasing its permeability, may seem less practical, but it nonetheless opens up another avenue for research and improvement.

The demonstration of the fact that with alternating currents of high frequency, sufficient energy may be transmitted under practicable conditions through the glass of an incandescent lamp by electrostatic or electromagnetic induction may lead to a departure in the construction of such devices. Another important experimental result achieved is the operation of lamps, and even motors, with the discharges of condensers, this method affording[Pg 123] a means of converting direct or alternating currents. In this connection Mr. Tesla advocates the perfecting of apparatus capable of generating electricity of high tension from heat energy, believing this to be a better way of obtaining electrical energy for practical purposes, particularly for the production of light.

The demonstration that high-frequency alternating currents can transmit enough energy through the glass of an incandescent lamp via electrostatic or electromagnetic induction under practical conditions may change how these devices are made. Another significant experimental result is that lamps and even motors can run on capacitor discharges, allowing for a way to convert direct or alternating currents. In this context, Mr. Tesla supports improving equipment that can generate high-voltage electricity from heat energy, believing this is a better method for obtaining electrical energy for practical uses, especially for producing light.

While many were probably prepared to encounter curious phenomena of impedance in the use of a condenser discharged disruptively, the experiments shown were extremely interesting on account of their paradoxical character. The burning of an incandescent lamp at any candle power when connected across a heavy metal bar, the existence of nodes on the bar and the possibility of exploring the bar by means of an ordinary Cardew voltmeter, are all peculiar developments, but perhaps the most interesting observation is the phenomenon of impedance observed in the lamp with a straight filament, which remains dark while the bulb glows.

While many might have been ready to encounter strange effects of impedance when using a condenser that discharges abruptly, the experiments presented were really fascinating due to their contradictory nature. The lighting of an incandescent lamp at any candle power when connected to a heavy metal bar, the appearance of nodes on the bar, and the ability to explore the bar using a standard Cardew voltmeter are all unusual developments. However, the most intriguing observation is the impedance effect seen in the lamp with a straight filament, which stays dark while the bulb emits light.

Mr. Tesla's manner of operating an induction coil by means of the disruptive discharge, and thus obtaining enormous differences of potential from comparatively small and inexpensive coils, will be appreciated by experimenters and will find valuable application in laboratories. Indeed, his many suggestions and hints in regard to the construction and use of apparatus in these investigations will be highly valued and will aid materially in future research.

Mr. Tesla's way of using an induction coil with disruptive discharge to achieve huge voltage differences from relatively small and affordable coils will be appreciated by experimenters and will be very useful in labs. In fact, his numerous suggestions and tips on building and using equipment for these investigations will be greatly valued and will significantly assist in future research.

The London lecture was delivered twice. In its first form, before the Institution of Electrical Engineers, it was in some respects an amplification of several points not specially enlarged upon in the New York lecture, but brought forward many additional discoveries and new investigations. Its repetition, in another form, at the Royal Institution, was due to Prof. Dewar, who with Lord Rayleigh, manifested a most lively interest in Mr. Tesla's work, and whose kindness illustrated once more the strong English love of scientific truth and appreciation of its votaries. As an indefatigable experimenter, Mr. Tesla was certainly nowhere more at home than in the haunts of Faraday, and as the guest of Faraday's successor. This Royal Institution lecture summed up the leading points of Mr. Tesla's work, in the high potential, high frequency field, and we may here avail ourselves of so valuable a summarization, in a simple form, of a subject by no means easy of comprehension until it has been thoroughly studied.[Pg 124]

The London lecture was given twice. In its first version, presented before the Institution of Electrical Engineers, it expanded on several points that weren't covered in detail during the New York lecture, but it also introduced many new discoveries and investigations. The second presentation at the Royal Institution happened thanks to Prof. Dewar, who, along with Lord Rayleigh, showed a great interest in Mr. Tesla's work, demonstrating the strong British appreciation for scientific truth and those who pursue it. As a relentless experimenter, Mr. Tesla felt very much at home in the footsteps of Faraday, as a guest of Faraday's successor. This Royal Institution lecture summarized the key aspects of Mr. Tesla's work in the high potential, high frequency field, and we can take advantage of this valuable summary, presented in a straightforward manner, of a topic that is not easy to understand without thorough study.[Pg 124]

In these London lectures, among the many notable points made was first, the difficulty of constructing the alternators to obtain the very high frequencies needed. To obtain the high frequencies it was necessary to provide several hundred polar projections, which were necessarily small and offered many drawbacks, and this the more as exceedingly high peripheral speeds had to be resorted to. In some of the first machines both armature and field had polar projections. These machines produced a curious noise, especially when the armature was started from the state of rest, the field being charged. The most efficient machine was found to be one with a drum armature, the iron body of which consisted of very thin wire annealed with special care. It was, of course, desirable to avoid the employment of iron in the armature, and several machines of this kind, with moving or stationary conductors were constructed, but the results obtained were not quite satisfactory, on account of the great mechanical and other difficulties encountered.

In these London lectures, one of the key points raised was the challenge of building alternators capable of producing the extremely high frequencies required. To achieve these high frequencies, it was necessary to create several hundred small polar projections, which came with many drawbacks, especially since they required very high peripheral speeds. In some of the early machines, both the armature and the field had polar projections. These machines made a strange noise, particularly when the armature was started from a complete stop while the field was energized. The most effective machine turned out to be one with a drum armature made of very thin wire that was carefully annealed. Naturally, it was preferable to avoid using iron in the armature altogether, and several machines of this type, with either moving or stationary conductors, were built, but the results were not entirely satisfactory due to significant mechanical and other challenges encountered.

The study of the properties of the high frequency currents obtained from these machines is very interesting, as nearly every experiment discloses something new. Two coils traversed by such a current attract or repel each other with a force which, owing to the imperfection of our sense of touch, seems continuous. An interesting observation, already noted under another form, is that a piece of iron, surrounded by a coil through which the current is passing appears to be continuously magnetized. This apparent continuity might be ascribed to the deficiency of the sense of touch, but there is evidence that in currents of such high frequencies one of the impulses preponderates over the other.

The study of the properties of high-frequency currents produced by these machines is really fascinating, as nearly every experiment reveals something new. Two coils carrying such a current attract or repel each other with a force that, due to the limitations of our sense of touch, feels continuous. An intriguing observation, already noted in another form, is that a piece of iron surrounded by a coil with the current flowing through it appears to be continuously magnetized. This seeming continuity might be due to the limitations of our sense of touch, but there’s evidence that in currents with such high frequencies, one of the impulses dominates over the other.

As might be expected, conductors traversed by such currents are rapidly heated, owing to the increase of the resistance, and the heating effects are relatively much greater in the iron. The hysteresis losses in iron are so great that an iron core, even if finely subdivided, is heated in an incredibly short time. To give an idea of this, an ordinary iron wire 1/16 inch in diameter inserted within a coil having 250 turns, with a current estimated to be five amperes passing through the coil, becomes within two seconds' time so hot as to scorch wood. Beyond a certain frequency, an iron core, no matter how finely subdivided, exercises a dampening effect, and it was easy to find a point at[Pg 125] which the impedance of a coil was not affected by the presence of a core consisting of a bundle of very thin well annealed and varnished iron wires.

As you might expect, conductors carrying such currents heat up quickly because of the increase in resistance, and the heating effects are significantly greater in iron. The hysteresis losses in iron are so substantial that even a finely divided iron core heats up in an incredibly short time. To illustrate, a regular iron wire that is 1/16 inch in diameter placed inside a coil with 250 turns, with a current of about five amperes flowing through the coil, can get hot enough to scorch wood in just two seconds. Beyond a certain frequency, an iron core, no matter how finely divided, dampens the effect, and it’s straightforward to identify a point at[Pg 125] where the impedance of a coil is not influenced by the presence of a core made of a bundle of very thin, well-annealed, and varnished iron wires.

Experiments with a telephone, a conductor in a strong magnetic field, or with a condenser or arc, seem to afford certain proof that sounds far above the usually accepted limit of hearing would be perceived if produced with sufficient power. The arc produced by these currents possesses several interesting features. Usually it emits a note the pitch of which corresponds to twice the frequency of the current, but if the frequency be sufficiently high it becomes noiseless, the limit of audition being determined principally by the linear dimensions of the arc. A curious feature of the arc is its persistency, which is due partly to the inability of the gaseous column to cool and increase considerably in resistance, as is the case with low frequencies, and partly to the tendency of such a high frequency machine to maintain a constant current.

Experiments with a telephone, a conductor in a strong magnetic field, or with a capacitor or arc seem to provide some proof that sounds well above the generally accepted limit of hearing could be detected if generated with enough power. The arc created by these currents has several interesting characteristics. Typically, it emits a note with a pitch that corresponds to twice the frequency of the current, but if the frequency is high enough, it becomes silent, with the threshold of hearing mainly determined by the size of the arc. An intriguing aspect of the arc is its persistence, which is partly due to the gaseous column's inability to cool down and significantly increase its resistance, as happens with low frequencies, and partly because a high-frequency machine tends to maintain a steady current.

In connection with these machines the condenser affords a particularly interesting study. Striking effects are produced by proper adjustments of capacity and self-induction. It is easy to raise the electromotive force of the machine to many times the original value by simply adjusting the capacity of a condenser connected in the induced circuit. If the condenser be at some distance from the machine, the difference of potential on the terminals of the latter may be only a small fraction of that on the condenser.

In relation to these machines, the condenser presents a particularly intriguing topic. Significant effects can be achieved through the right adjustments of capacity and self-induction. It’s relatively straightforward to increase the electromotive force of the machine to several times its original value just by adjusting the capacity of a condenser linked to the induced circuit. If the condenser is positioned some distance away from the machine, the potential difference across the terminals of the machine may only be a small fraction of that across the condenser.

But the most interesting experiences are gained when the tension of the currents from the machine is raised by means of an induction coil. In consequence of the enormous rate of change obtainable in the primary current, much higher potential differences are obtained than with coils operated in the usual ways, and, owing to the high frequency, the secondary discharge possesses many striking peculiarities. Both the electrodes behave generally alike, though it appears from some observations that one current impulse preponderates over the other, as before mentioned.

But the most interesting experiences come when the tension of the currents from the machine is increased using an induction coil. Because of the huge rate of change possible in the primary current, much higher voltage differences are achieved than with coils used in the usual ways, and due to the high frequency, the secondary discharge has many notable characteristics. Both electrodes typically behave similarly, although some observations suggest that one current impulse is stronger than the other, as previously mentioned.

The physiological effects of the high tension discharge are found to be so small that the shock of the coil can be supported without any inconvenience, except perhaps a small burn produced by the discharge upon approaching the hand to one of the terminals. The decidedly smaller physiological effects of these cur[Pg 126]rents are thought to be due either to a different distribution through the body or to the tissues acting as condensers. But in the case of an induction coil with a great many turns the harmlessness is principally due to the fact that but little energy is available in the external circuit when the same is closed through the experimenter's body, on account of the great impedance of the coil.

The physiological effects of high tension discharge are so minimal that the shock from the coil can be tolerated without any major issues, except maybe a slight burn caused by the discharge if you get your hand too close to one of the terminals. The significantly smaller physiological effects of these currents are believed to be either due to a different distribution throughout the body or because the tissues act like capacitors. However, with an induction coil that has many turns, the lack of harm is mainly because very little energy is available in the external circuit when it’s closed through the experimenter's body, due to the high impedance of the coil.

In varying the frequency and strength of the currents through the primary of the coil, the character of the secondary discharge is greatly varied, and no less than five distinct forms are observed:—A weak, sensitive thread discharge, a powerful flaming discharge, and three forms of brush or streaming discharges. Each of these possesses certain noteworthy features, but the most interesting to study are the latter.

By changing the frequency and strength of the currents through the coil's primary, the nature of the secondary discharge changes significantly, and we can observe no fewer than five distinct forms: a weak, sensitive thread discharge; a strong flaming discharge; and three types of brush or streaming discharges. Each of these has some notable characteristics, but the most fascinating ones to examine are the last three.

Under certain conditions the streams, which are presumably due to the violent agitation of the air molecules, issue freely from all points of the coil, even through a thick insulation. If there is the smallest air space between the primary and secondary, they will form there and surely injure the coil by slowly warming the insulation. As they form even with ordinary frequencies when the potential is excessive, the air-space must be most carefully avoided. These high frequency streamers differ in aspect and properties from those produced by a static machine. The wind produced by them is small and should altogether cease if still considerably higher frequencies could be obtained. A peculiarity is that they issue as freely from surfaces as from points. Owing to this, a metallic vane, mounted in one of the terminals of the coil so as to rotate freely, and having one of its sides covered with insulation, is spun rapidly around. Such a vane would not rotate with a steady potential, but with a high frequency coil it will spin, even if it be entirely covered with insulation, provided the insulation on one side be either thicker or of a higher specific inductive capacity. A Crookes electric radiometer is also spun around when connected to one of the terminals of the coil, but only at very high exhaustion or at ordinary pressures.

Under certain conditions, the streams, which are likely caused by the intense agitation of air molecules, can emerge freely from all points of the coil, even through thick insulation. If there's even a tiny air gap between the primary and secondary, they will form there and can gradually damage the coil by overheating the insulation. Since they form even at normal frequencies when the potential is too high, air gaps must be avoided at all costs. These high-frequency streamers look and behave differently from those produced by a static machine. The wind they generate is minimal and should stop altogether if much higher frequencies could be achieved. A unique feature is that they can emerge as easily from surfaces as from points. Because of this, a metallic vane, placed at one of the coil's terminals so it can rotate freely, and with one side covered in insulation, spins rapidly around. This vane won't rotate under steady potential, but with a high-frequency coil, it will spin, even if it's completely covered with insulation, as long as the insulation on one side is either thicker or has a higher specific inductive capacity. A Crookes electric radiometer also spins when connected to one of the coil's terminals, but only at very high vacuum levels or at normal pressures.

There is still another and more striking peculiarity of such a high frequency streamer, namely, it is hot. The heat is easily perceptible with frequencies of about 10,000, even if the potential is not excessively high. The heating effect is, of course, due to the molecular impacts and collisions. Could the frequency and potential be pushed far enough, then a brush could be pro[Pg 127]duced resembling in every particular a flame and giving light and heat, yet without a chemical process taking place.

There’s another notable feature of a high-frequency streamer: it’s hot. You can easily feel the heat at frequencies around 10,000, even if the voltage isn't overly high. This heating effect happens because of molecular impacts and collisions. If the frequency and voltage are increased sufficiently, it could create a brush that looks exactly like a flame and provides light and heat, but without any chemical reaction occurring.

The hot brush, when properly produced, resembles a jet of burning gas escaping under great pressure, and it emits an extraordinary strong smell of ozone. The great ozonizing action is ascribed to the fact that the agitation of the molecules of the air is more violent in such a brush than in the ordinary streamer of a static machine. But the most powerful brush discharges were produced by employing currents of much higher frequencies than it was possible to obtain by means of the alternators. These currents were obtained by disruptively discharging a condenser and setting up oscillations. In this manner currents of a frequency of several hundred thousand were obtained.

The hot brush, when made correctly, looks like a jet of burning gas escaping under high pressure, and it gives off a really strong smell of ozone. This intense ozonizing effect is due to the fact that the air molecules are agitated more violently in this brush than in the regular stream from a static machine. However, the most powerful brush discharges were achieved by using currents with much higher frequencies than what could be produced by alternators. These currents were generated by disruptively discharging a capacitor and creating oscillations. This way, frequencies of several hundred thousand were obtained.

Currents of this kind, Mr. Tesla pointed out, produce striking effects. At these frequencies, the impedance of a copper bar is so great that a potential difference of several hundred volts can be maintained between two points of a short and thick bar, and it is possible to keep an ordinary incandescent lamp burning at full candle power by attaching the terminals of the lamp to two points of the bar no more than a few inches apart. When the frequency is extremely high, nodes are found to exist on such a bar, and it is easy to locate them by means of a lamp.

Currents like these, Mr. Tesla pointed out, create impressive effects. At these frequencies, the resistance of a copper bar is so high that a voltage difference of several hundred volts can be sustained between two points on a short, thick bar. It’s also possible to keep a regular incandescent light bulb shining brightly by connecting the lamp’s terminals to two points on the bar that are just a few inches apart. When the frequency is very high, nodes can be found on such a bar, and it's simple to identify them using a lamp.

By converting the high tension discharges of a low frequency coil in this manner, it was found practicable to keep a few lamps burning on the ordinary circuit in the laboratory, and by bringing the undulation to a low pitch, it was possible to operate small motors.

By converting the high voltage outputs of a low frequency coil in this way, it became practical to keep a few lamps lit on the regular circuit in the lab, and by lowering the frequency, it was possible to run small motors.

This plan likewise allows of converting high tension discharges of one direction into low tension unidirectional currents, by adjusting the circuit so that there are no oscillations. In passing the oscillating discharges through the primary of a specially constructed coil, it is easy to obtain enormous potential differences with only few turns of the secondary.

This plan also makes it possible to turn high-tension discharges of one direction into low-tension unidirectional currents by adjusting the circuit to eliminate any oscillations. By passing the oscillating discharges through the primary of a specially designed coil, it's easy to achieve very high potential differences with only a few turns of the secondary.

Great difficulties were at first experienced in producing a successful coil on this plan. It was found necessary to keep all air, or gaseous matter in general, away from the charged surfaces, and oil immersion was resorted to. The wires used were heavily covered with gutta-percha and wound in oil, or the air was pumped out by means of a Sprengel pump. The general arrangement was the following:—An ordinary induction coil, operated from a low frequency alternator, was used to charge Leyden jars. The[Pg 128] jars were made to discharge over a single or multiple gap through the primary of the second coil. To insure the action of the gap, the arc was blown out by a magnet or air blast. To adjust the potential in the secondary a small oil condenser was used, or polished brass spheres of different sizes were screwed on the terminals and their distance adjusted.

At first, there were significant challenges in making a successful coil using this method. It was essential to keep any air or gas away from the charged surfaces, so oil immersion was utilized. The wires were thickly coated with gutta-percha and immersed in oil, or air was evacuated using a Sprengel pump. The overall setup was as follows: an ordinary induction coil, powered by a low-frequency alternator, was used to charge Leyden jars. The[Pg 128] jars discharged over a single or multiple gap through the primary of the second coil. To ensure the gap functioned correctly, the arc was extinguished using a magnet or an air blast. A small oil condenser was used to adjust the potential in the secondary, or polished brass spheres of varying sizes were attached to the terminals and their distance adjusted.

When the conditions were carefully determined to suit each experiment, magnificent effects were obtained. Two wires, stretched through the room, each being connected to one of the terminals of the coil, emitted streams so powerful that the light from them allowed distinguishing the objects in the room; the wires became luminous even though covered with thick and most excellent insulation. When two straight wires, or two concentric circles of wire, are connected to the terminals, and set at the proper distance, a uniform luminous sheet is produced between them. It was possible in this way to cover an area of more than one meter square completely with the streams. By attaching to one terminal a large circle of wire and to the other terminal a small sphere, the streams are focused upon the sphere, produce a strongly lighted spot upon the same, and present the appearance of a luminous cone. A very thin wire glued upon a plate of hard rubber of great thickness, on the opposite side of which is fastened a tinfoil coating, is rendered intensely luminous when the coating is connected to the other terminal of the coil. Such an experiment can be performed also with low frequency currents, but much less satisfactorily.

When the conditions were carefully set for each experiment, impressive results were achieved. Two wires stretched across the room, each connected to one of the terminals of the coil, produced such strong beams of light that they illuminated the room well enough to see the objects inside. The wires glowed even though they were covered with thick, high-quality insulation. When two straight wires or two concentric circles of wire are connected to the terminals and placed at the right distance apart, a uniform sheet of light forms between them. This method was able to completely cover an area larger than one square meter with the beams. By connecting a large circle of wire to one terminal and a small sphere to the other, the beams concentrate on the sphere, creating a brightly lit spot and resembling a luminous cone. A very thin wire attached to a thick hard rubber plate, with a layer of tinfoil on the opposite side connected to the other terminal of the coil, becomes intensely bright. This experiment can also be done with low-frequency currents, but the results are much less satisfying.

When the terminals of such a coil, even of a very small one, are separated by a rubber or glass plate, the discharge spreads over the plate in the form of streams, threads or brilliant sparks, and affords a magnificent display, which cannot be equaled by the largest coil operated in the usual ways. By a simple adjustment it is possible to produce with the coil a succession of brilliant sparks, exactly as with a Holtz machine.

When the ends of a coil, even a small one, are placed apart by a rubber or glass plate, the discharge spreads across the plate as streams, threads, or bright sparks, creating a stunning display that’s unmatched by even the biggest coils used in traditional ways. With a simple adjustment, you can generate a series of bright sparks with the coil, just like with a Holtz machine.

Under certain conditions, when the frequency of the oscillation is very great, white, phantom-like streams are seen to break forth from the terminals of the coil. The chief interesting feature about them is, that they stream freely against the outstretched hand or other conducting object without producing any sensation, and the hand may be approached very near to the terminal without a spark being induced to jump. This is due presumably to the fact that a considerable portion of the energy is carried[Pg 129] away or dissipated in the streamers, and the difference of potential between the terminal and the hand is diminished.

Under certain conditions, when the oscillation frequency is really high, white, ghostly streams appear to shoot out from the ends of the coil. The most interesting thing about them is that they flow freely toward an outstretched hand or any other conducting object without causing any sensation, and you can get very close to the terminal without a spark jumping. This is probably because a significant amount of energy is carried away or dissipated in the streams, which reduces the potential difference between the terminal and the hand.

It is found in such experiments that the frequency of the vibration and the quickness of succession of the sparks between the knobs affect to a marked degree the appearance of the streams. When the frequency is very low, the air gives way in more or less the same manner as by a steady difference of potential, and the streams consist of distinct threads, generally mingled with thin sparks, which probably correspond to the successive discharges occurring between the knobs. But when the frequency is very high, and the arc of the discharge produces a sound which is loud and smooth (which indicates both that oscillation takes place and that the sparks succeed each other with great rapidity), then the luminous streams formed are perfectly uniform. They are generally of a purplish hue, but when the molecular vibration is increased by raising the potential, they assume a white color.

In these experiments, it's observed that the frequency of vibration and the speed at which sparks jump between the knobs greatly influence the appearance of the streams. When the frequency is very low, the air behaves similarly to how it does with a steady voltage difference, resulting in distinct threads of streams, often mixed with thin sparks that likely correspond to the quick discharges occurring between the knobs. However, when the frequency is very high, and the discharge arc produces a loud, smooth sound (which indicates both oscillation and that the sparks occur rapidly), the luminous streams created are completely uniform. They usually have a purplish color, but as the molecular vibration increases by raising the voltage, they turn white.

The luminous intensity of the streams increases rapidly when the potential is increased; and with frequencies of only a few hundred thousand, could the coil be made to withstand a sufficiently high potential difference, there is no doubt that the space around a wire could be made to emit a strong light, merely by the agitation of the molecules of the air at ordinary pressure.

The brightness of the streams increases quickly when the voltage is raised; and at frequencies of just a few hundred thousand, if the coil can handle a high enough voltage, it’s clear that the space around a wire could start to emit a bright light simply by shaking up the air molecules at regular pressure.

Such discharges of very high frequency which render luminous the air at ordinary pressure we have very likely occasion to witness in the aurora borealis. From many of these experiments it seems reasonable to infer that sudden cosmic disturbances, such as eruptions on the sun, set the electrostatic charge of the earth in an extremely rapid vibration, and produce the glow by the violent agitation of the air in the upper and even in the lower strata. It is thought that if the frequency were low, or even more so if the charge were not at all vibrating, the lower dense strata would break down as in a lightning discharge. Indications of such breaking down have been repeatedly observed, but they can be attributed to the fundamental disturbances, which are few in number, for the superimposed vibration would be so rapid as not to allow a disruptive break.

We often see these high-frequency discharges that light up the air at normal pressure in the aurora borealis. Many experiments suggest that sudden cosmic events, like solar eruptions, cause the Earth's electrostatic charge to vibrate extremely quickly, creating the glow by violently disturbing the air both high up and lower down. It's believed that if the frequency were lower, or if the charge wasn't vibrating at all, the denser lower layers would break down like during a lightning strike. Signs of such breakdowns have been observed multiple times, but they can be linked to the main disturbances, which are few, since the superimposed vibration is so rapid that it doesn't allow for a disruptive breakdown.

The study of these discharge phenomena has led Mr. Tesla to the recognition of some important facts. It was found, as already stated, that gaseous matter must be most carefully excluded from[Pg 130] any dielectric which is subjected to great, rapidly changing electrostatic stresses. Since it is difficult to exclude the gas perfectly when solid insulators are used, it is necessary to resort to liquid dielectrics. When a solid dielectric is used, it matters little how thick and how good it is; if air be present, streamers form, which gradually heat the dielectric and impair its insulating power, and the discharge finally breaks through. Under ordinary conditions the best insulators are those which possess the highest specific inductive capacity, but such insulators are not the best to employ when working with these high frequency currents, for in most cases the higher specific inductive capacity is rather a disadvantage. The prime quality of the insulating medium for these currents is continuity. For this reason principally it is necessary to employ liquid insulators, such as oils. If two metal plates, connected to the terminals of the coil, are immersed in oil and set a distance apart, the coil may be kept working for any length of time without a break occurring, or without the oil being warmed, but if air bubbles are introduced, they become luminous; the air molecules, by their impact against the oil, heat it, and after some time cause the insulation to give way. If, instead of the oil, a solid plate of the best dielectric, even several times thicker than the oil intervening between the metal plates, is inserted between the latter, the air having free access to the charged surfaces, the dielectric invariably is warmed and breaks down.

The study of these discharge phenomena has led Mr. Tesla to recognize some important facts. It was found, as already mentioned, that gaseous matter must be carefully excluded from[Pg 130] any dielectric exposed to intense, rapidly changing electrostatic stresses. Since it's challenging to completely eliminate gas when solid insulators are used, it’s necessary to use liquid dielectrics. When a solid dielectric is utilized, its thickness and quality don’t matter much; if air is present, streamers form, gradually heating the dielectric and diminishing its insulating ability, causing the discharge to eventually break through. Under normal conditions, the best insulators are those with the highest specific inductive capacity, but these insulators aren't ideal for dealing with high-frequency currents, as the higher specific inductive capacity often becomes a disadvantage. The key quality of the insulating medium for these currents is continuity. For this main reason, it's essential to use liquid insulators, such as oils. If two metal plates connected to the coil are immersed in oil and spaced apart, the coil can operate indefinitely without any interruptions or heating of the oil. However, if air bubbles are introduced, they become luminous; the air molecules, upon colliding with the oil, heat it and eventually cause the insulation to fail. If, instead of oil, a solid plate of the best dielectric, even several times thicker than the oil, is placed between the metal plates, allowing air to access the charged surfaces, the dielectric will inevitably heat up and break down.

The employment of oil is advisable or necessary even with low frequencies, if the potentials are such that streamers form, but only in such cases, as is evident from the theory of the action. If the potentials are so low that streamers do not form, then it is even disadvantageous to employ oil, for it may, principally by confining the heat, be the cause of the breaking down of the insulation.

Using oil is recommended or required even at low frequencies, if the potentials are high enough for streamers to form, but only in those situations, as the theory of action shows. If the potentials are so low that streamers don’t form, then using oil can actually be harmful because it might trap heat, leading to insulation breakdown.

The exclusion of gaseous matter is not only desirable on account of the safety of the apparatus, but also on account of economy, especially in a condenser, in which considerable waste of power may occur merely owing to the presence of air, if the electric density on the charged surfaces is great.

The removal of gas is not only important for the safety of the equipment but also for efficiency, especially in a condenser, where significant energy loss can happen just from having air present if the electric density on the charged surfaces is high.

In the course of these investigations a phenomenon of special scientific interest was observed. It may be ranked among the brush phenomena, in fact it is a kind of brush which forms at, or near, a single terminal in high vacuum. In a bulb with a con[Pg 131]ducting electrode, even if the latter be of aluminum, the brush has only a very short existence, but it can be preserved for a considerable length of time in a bulb devoid of any conducting electrode. To observe the phenomenon it is found best to employ a large spherical bulb having in its centre a small bulb supported on a tube sealed to the neck of the former. The large bulb being exhausted to a high degree, and the inside of the small bulb being connected to one of the terminals of the coil, under certain conditions there appears a misty haze around the small bulb, which, after passing through some stages, assumes the form of a brush, generally at right angles to the tube supporting the small bulb. When the brush assumes this form it may be brought to a state of extreme sensitiveness to electrostatic and magnetic influence. The bulb hanging straight down, and all objects being remote from it, the approach of the observer within a few paces will cause the brush to fly to the opposite side, and if he walks around the bulb it will always keep on the opposite side. It may begin to spin around the terminal long before it reaches that sensitive stage. When it begins to turn around, principally, but also before, it is affected by a magnet, and at a certain stage it is susceptible to magnetic influence to an astonishing degree. A small permanent magnet, with its poles at a distance of no more than two centimetres will affect it visibly at a distance of two metres, slowing down or accelerating the rotation according to how it is held relatively to the brush.

During these investigations, a phenomenon of particular scientific interest was observed. It falls under the category of brush phenomena; in fact, it’s a type of brush that forms at or near a single terminal in high vacuum. In a bulb with a conducting electrode, even if that electrode is made of aluminum, the brush only lasts a very short time, but it can be maintained for a considerable duration in a bulb without any conducting electrode. To observe this phenomenon, it is best to use a large spherical bulb with a small bulb at its center, supported by a tube sealed to the neck of the larger bulb. The large bulb should be highly evacuated, and the inside of the small bulb connected to one of the coil's terminals. Under certain conditions, a misty haze appears around the small bulb, which, after passing through several stages, takes the shape of a brush, typically at right angles to the tube holding the small bulb. Once the brush takes this shape, it can become extremely sensitive to electrostatic and magnetic influences. When the bulb is hanging straight down and all objects are kept at a distance, the approach of an observer within a few steps will cause the brush to move to the opposite side, and as the observer walks around the bulb, it remains on the opposite side. It may start to spin around the terminal long before reaching that sensitive stage. When it begins to rotate, primarily but also before this, it reacts to a magnet, becoming remarkably sensitive to magnetic influence at a certain point. A small permanent magnet, with its poles just two centimeters apart, can visibly affect it from two meters away, slowing down or speeding up the rotation depending on how it is oriented relative to the brush.

When the bulb hangs with the globe down, the rotation is always clockwise. In the southern hemisphere it would occur in the opposite direction, and on the (magnetic) equator the brush should not turn at all. The rotation may be reversed by a magnet kept at some distance. The brush rotates best, seemingly, when it is at right angles to the lines of force of the earth. It very likely rotates, when at its maximum speed, in synchronism with the alternations, say, 10,000 times a second. The rotation can be slowed down or accelerated by the approach or recession of the observer, or any conducting body, but it cannot be reversed by putting the bulb in any position. Very curious experiments may be performed with the brush when in its most sensitive state. For instance, the brush resting in one position, the experimenter may, by selecting a proper position, approach the hand at a certain considerable distance to the bulb, and he may cause the brush to pass off by merely stiffening the muscles of[Pg 132] the arm, the mere change of configuration of the arm and the consequent imperceptible displacement being sufficient to disturb the delicate balance. When it begins to rotate slowly, and the hands are held at a proper distance, it is impossible to make even the slightest motion without producing a visible effect upon the brush. A metal plate connected to the other terminal of the coil affects it at a great distance, slowing down the rotation often to one turn a second.

When the bulb is hanging with the globe facing down, it always rotates clockwise. In the southern hemisphere, it spins in the opposite direction, and at the (magnetic) equator, it shouldn't turn at all. You can reverse the rotation with a magnet kept at some distance. The brush seems to rotate best when it's at right angles to the Earth's magnetic lines of force. It probably rotates, at its maximum speed, synchronously with the alternations, like 10,000 times a second. The rotation can speed up or slow down depending on how close or far the observer or any conducting object gets, but changing the position of the bulb won't reverse it. Very interesting experiments can be done with the brush when it's extremely sensitive. For example, if the brush is resting in one spot, the experimenter can cause it to move by simply positioning their hand at a significant distance from the bulb, making the brush react just by tensing their arm muscles; the slight shift in arm configuration is enough to disrupt the delicate balance. Once it starts to rotate slowly, any slight movement of the hands at the right distance produces a visible effect on the brush. A metal plate connected to the other terminal of the coil can influence it from far away, often slowing the rotation to just one turn per second.

Mr. Tesla hopes that this phenomenon will prove a valuable aid in the investigation of the nature of the forces acting in an electrostatic or magnetic field. If there is any motion which is measurable going on in the space, such a brush would be apt to reveal it. It is, so to speak, a beam of light, frictionless, devoid of inertia. On account of its marvellous sensitiveness to electrostatic or magnetic disturbances it may be the means of sending signals through submarine cables with any speed, and even of transmitting intelligence to a distance without wires.

Mr. Tesla hopes that this phenomenon will be a valuable tool in exploring the nature of the forces in an electrostatic or magnetic field. If any measurable motion is happening in the space, such a brush would likely reveal it. It’s like a beam of light—frictionless and free from inertia. Due to its incredible sensitivity to electrostatic or magnetic disturbances, it could be used to send signals through underwater cables at high speeds, and even transmit information over long distances without wires.

In operating an induction coil with these rapidly alternating currents, it is astonishing to note, for the first time, the great importance of the relation of capacity, self-induction, and frequency as bearing upon the general result. The combined effect of these elements produces many curious effects. For instance, two metal plates are connected to the terminals and set at a small distance, so that an arc is formed between them. This arc prevents a strong current from flowing through the coil. If the arc be interrupted by the interposition of a glass plate, the capacity of the condenser obtained counteracts the self-induction, and a stronger current is made to pass. The effects of capacity are the most striking, for in these experiments, since the self-induction and frequency both are high, the critical capacity is very small, and need be but slightly varied to produce a very considerable change. The experimenter brings his body in contact with the terminals of the secondary of the coil, or attaches to one or both terminals insulated bodies of very small bulk, such as exhausted bulbs, and he produces a considerable rise or fall of potential on the secondary, and greatly affects the flow of the current through the primary coil.

When using an induction coil with rapidly changing currents, it's remarkable to recognize for the first time how crucial the relationship between capacity, self-induction, and frequency is to the overall outcome. The combined influence of these factors leads to many interesting effects. For example, if two metal plates are connected to the terminals and placed a short distance apart, an arc forms between them. This arc prevents a strong current from passing through the coil. If the arc is interrupted by placing a glass plate in between, the capacity of the resulting condenser counteracts the self-induction, allowing a stronger current to flow. The effects of capacity are especially notable, as in these experiments, both self-induction and frequency are high, making the critical capacity very small, and it only needs a slight adjustment to create a significant change. The experimenter can touch the terminals of the secondary coil with their body or attach small insulated objects, like empty bulbs, to one or both terminals, resulting in a substantial increase or decrease in potential on the secondary, greatly affecting the current through the primary coil.

In many of the phenomena observed, the presence of the air, or, generally speaking, of a medium of a gaseous nature (using this term not to imply specific properties, but in contradistinction to homogeneity or perfect continuity) plays an important part,[Pg 133] as it allows energy to be dissipated by molecular impact or bombardment. The action is thus explained:—When an insulated body connected to a terminal of the coil is suddenly charged to high potential, it acts inductively upon the surrounding air, or whatever gaseous medium there might be. The molecules or atoms which are near it are, of course, more attracted, and move through a greater distance than the further ones. When the nearest molecules strike the body they are repelled, and collisions occur at all distances within the inductive distance. It is now clear that, if the potential be steady, but little loss of energy can be caused in this way, for the molecules which are nearest to the body having had an additional charge imparted to them by contact, are not attracted until they have parted, if not with all, at least with most of the additional charge, which can be accomplished only after a great many collisions. This is inferred from the fact that with a steady potential there is but little loss in dry air. When the potential, instead of being steady, is alternating, the conditions are entirely different. In this case a rhythmical bombardment occurs, no matter whether the molecules after coming in contact with the body lose the imparted charge or not, and, what is more, if the charge is not lost, the impacts are all the more violent. Still, if the frequency of the impulses be very small, the loss caused by the impacts and collisions would not be serious unless the potential was excessive. But when extremely high frequencies and more or less high potentials are used, the loss may be very great. The total energy lost per unit of time is proportionate to the product of the number of impacts per second, or the frequency and the energy lost in each impact. But the energy of an impact must be proportionate to the square of the electric density of the body, on the assumption that the charge imparted to the molecule is proportionate to that density. It is concluded from this that the total energy lost must be proportionate to the product of the frequency and the square of the electric density; but this law needs experimental confirmation. Assuming the preceding considerations to be true, then, by rapidly alternating the potential of a body immersed in an insulating gaseous medium, any amount of energy may be dissipated into space. Most of that energy, then, is not dissipated in the form of long ether waves, propagated to considerable distance, as is thought most generally, but is consumed in impact and collisional losses—that is, heat vibrations—on the surface and in[Pg 134] the vicinity of the body. To reduce the dissipation it is necessary to work with a small electric density—the smaller, the higher the frequency.

In many of the observed phenomena, the presence of air, or generally speaking, a gaseous medium (not implying specific properties, but contrasting with homogeneity or perfect continuity) plays an important role,[Pg 133] as it allows energy to be dissipated through molecular impact or bombardment. The process works like this: When an insulated object connected to a terminal of the coil is suddenly charged to a high voltage, it inductively affects the surrounding air or any gaseous medium present. The molecules or atoms nearby are, of course, more attracted and move greater distances than those farther away. When the closest molecules strike the object, they are repelled, resulting in collisions at all distances within the inductive range. It becomes clear that if the voltage remains steady, there is minimal energy loss because the nearest molecules, having received an additional charge from contact, aren’t attracted back until they've released most, if not all, of that extra charge, which takes a lot of collisions. This is supported by the fact that with a steady voltage, there’s only a slight energy loss in dry air. When the voltage alternates instead of being steady, the conditions change completely. In this case, a rhythmic bombardment occurs, whether or not the molecules lose the imparted charge upon contact, and if they don’t lose the charge, the impacts are even more intense. However, if the frequency of these impulses is very low, the energy lost due to impacts and collisions won’t be significant unless the voltage is extremely high. But when very high frequencies and relatively high voltages are applied, the energy loss can be substantial. The total energy lost per time unit is proportional to the product of the number of impacts per second (the frequency) and the energy lost in each impact. The energy of an impact must be proportional to the square of the electric density of the object, assuming that the charge given to the molecule relates to that density. It follows that the total energy lost should be proportional to the product of the frequency and the square of the electric density, although this law requires experimental verification. If we accept the above considerations as correct, then by rapidly alternating the voltage of an object immersed in an insulating gaseous medium, any amount of energy can be dissipated into space. However, most of that energy isn’t lost in the form of long ether waves traveling great distances, as is commonly believed, but is instead consumed as impact and collision losses—that is, as heat vibrations—on the surface and in[Pg 134] the area surrounding the object. To minimize dissipation, it’s necessary to operate with a low electric density—the lower the density, the higher the frequency.

The behavior of a gaseous medium to such rapid alternations of potential makes it appear plausible that electrostatic disturbances of the earth, produced by cosmic events, may have great influence upon the meteorological conditions. When such disturbances occur both the frequency of the vibrations of the charge and the potential are in all probability excessive, and the energy converted into heat may be considerable. Since the density must be unevenly distributed, either in consequence of the irregularity of the earth's surface, or on account of the condition of the atmosphere in various places, the effect produced would accordingly vary from place to place. Considerable variations in the temperature and pressure of the atmosphere may in this manner be caused at any point of the surface of the earth. The variations may be gradual or very sudden, according to the nature of the original disturbance, and may produce rain and storms, or locally modify the weather in any way.

The way a gas responds to quick changes in potential makes it seem likely that electrostatic disturbances from cosmic events can significantly affect weather conditions on Earth. When these disturbances happen, both the frequency of the charge's vibrations and the potential are probably very high, and the energy converted into heat can be substantial. Since the density is likely unevenly spread out due to the irregularity of the Earth's surface or variations in the atmosphere at different locations, the effects will vary from place to place. This can lead to significant changes in temperature and pressure in the atmosphere anywhere on the Earth's surface. The changes can be gradual or sudden, depending on the nature of the original disturbance, and can result in rain and storms or alter local weather in various ways.

From many experiences gathered in the course of these investigations it appears certain that in lightning discharges the air is an element of importance. For instance, during a storm a stream may form on a nail or pointed projection of a building. If lightning strikes somewhere in the neighborhood, the harmless static discharge may, in consequence of the oscillations set up, assume the character of a high-frequency streamer, and the nail or projection may be brought to a high temperature by the violent impact of the air molecules. Thus, it is thought, a building may be set on fire without the lightning striking it. In like manner small metallic objects may be fused and volatilized—as frequently occurs in lightning discharges—merely because they are surrounded by air. Were they immersed in a practically continuous medium, such as oil, they would probably be safe, as the energy would have to spend itself elsewhere.

From various experiences collected during these investigations, it seems clear that air plays an important role in lightning discharges. For example, during a storm, a stream may form on a nail or pointed edge of a building. If lightning strikes nearby, the harmless static discharge can, due to the oscillations created, turn into a high-frequency streamer, causing the nail or edge to heat up significantly from the violent impact of air molecules. This suggests that a building can catch fire without being directly struck by lightning. Similarly, small metal objects can melt and vaporize—something that often happens during lightning strikes—simply because they are surrounded by air. If they were immersed in a nearly continuous medium, like oil, they would likely be safe, as the energy would need to dissipate elsewhere.

An instructive experience having a bearing on this subject is the following:—A glass tube of an inch or so in diameter and several inches long is taken, and a platinum wire sealed into it, the wire running through the center of the tube from end to end. The tube is exhausted to a moderate degree. If a steady current is passed through the wire it is heated uniformly in all parts and the gas in the tube is of no consequence. But if high[Pg 135] frequency discharges are directed through the wire, it is heated more on the ends than in the middle portion, and if the frequency, or rate of charge, is high enough, the wire might as well be cut in the middle as not, for most of the heating on the ends is due to the rarefied gas. Here the gas might only act as a conductor of no impedance, diverting the current from the wire as the impedance of the latter is enormously increased, and merely heating the ends of the wire by reason of their resistance to the passage of the discharge. But it is not at all necessary that the gas in the tube should be conducting; it might be at an extremely low pressure, still the ends of the wire would be heated; however, as is ascertained by experience, only the two ends would in such case not be electrically connected through the gaseous medium. Now, what with these frequencies and potentials occurs in an exhausted tube, occurs in the lightning discharge at ordinary pressure.

An informative experience related to this topic is as follows: A glass tube about an inch in diameter and several inches long is taken, with a platinum wire sealed into it, running through the center from one end to the other. The tube is partially evacuated. When a steady current passes through the wire, it heats uniformly along its length and the gas inside the tube doesn’t matter. However, if high-frequency discharges are directed through the wire, the ends heat up more than the middle section. If the frequency, or charge rate, is high enough, it could be as if the wire is cut in the middle because most of the heating at the ends is caused by the rarefied gas. In this case, the gas might serve only as a conductor with no impedance, diverting the current away from the wire since the impedance of the wire is significantly increased, and merely heating the ends by resisting the flow of the discharge. It’s not necessary for the gas in the tube to conduct; it could be at a very low pressure, yet the ends of the wire would still heat up. However, as determined by experience, in such a scenario, only the two ends would not be electrically connected through the gaseous medium. What happens with these frequencies and potentials in an evacuated tube also occurs during a lightning discharge at normal pressure.

From the facility with which any amount of energy may be carried off through a gas, Mr. Tesla infers that the best way to render harmless a lightning discharge is to afford it in some way a passage through a volume of gas.

From the ease with which any amount of energy can be carried away through a gas, Mr. Tesla concludes that the best way to neutralize a lightning strike is to somehow provide it a path through a volume of gas.

The recognition of some of the above facts has a bearing upon far-reaching scientific investigations in which extremely high frequencies and potentials are used. In such cases the air is an important factor to be considered. So, for instance, if two wires are attached to the terminals of the coil, and the streamers issue from them, there is dissipation of energy in the form of heat and light, and the wires behave like a condenser of larger capacity. If the wires be immersed in oil, the dissipation of energy is prevented, or at least reduced, and the apparent capacity is diminished. The action of the air would seem to make it very difficult to tell, from the measured or computed capacity of a condenser in which the air is acted upon, its actual capacity or vibration period, especially if the condenser is of very small surface and is charged to a very high potential. As many important results are dependant upon the correctness of the estimation of the vibration period, this subject demands the most careful scrutiny of investigators.

The recognition of some of the facts mentioned above impacts extensive scientific research that uses extremely high frequencies and voltages. In these situations, air is a crucial factor to consider. For example, if two wires are connected to the terminals of a coil and sparks arise from them, there is energy loss in the form of heat and light, and the wires function like a larger capacity capacitor. If the wires are submerged in oil, the energy loss is prevented or at least reduced, and the apparent capacity decreases. The influence of the air makes it very challenging to determine, based on the measured or calculated capacity of a capacitor affected by the air, its actual capacity or frequency response, especially if the capacitor has a very small surface area and is charged to a very high voltage. Since many significant outcomes depend on the accuracy of estimating the vibration period, this topic requires thorough examination by researchers.

In Leyden jars the loss due to the presence of air is comparatively small, principally on account of the great surface of the coatings and the small external action, but if there are streamers on the top, the loss may be considerable, and the period of vibra[Pg 136]tion is affected. In a resonator, the density is small, but the frequency is extreme, and may introduce a considerable error. It appears certain, at any rate, that the periods of vibration of a charged body in a gaseous and in a continuous medium, such as oil, are different, on account of the action of the former, as explained.

In Leyden jars, the loss caused by air is relatively minor, mainly due to the large surface area of the coatings and the low external impact. However, if there are streamers at the top, the loss can be significant, affecting the vibration period. In a resonator, the density is low, but the frequency is very high, which can lead to considerable errors. It seems clear that the vibration periods of a charged body in a gas compared to a continuous medium like oil are different, due to the influence of the former, as explained.

Another fact recognized, which is of some consequence, is, that in similar investigations the general considerations of static screening are not applicable when a gaseous medium is present. This is evident from the following experiment:—A short and wide glass tube is taken and covered with a substantial coating of bronze powder, barely allowing the light to shine a little through. The tube is highly exhausted and suspended on a metallic clasp from the end of a wire. When the wire is connected with one of the terminals of the coil, the gas inside of the tube is lighted in spite of the metal coating. Here the metal evidently does not screen the gas inside as it ought to, even if it be very thin and poorly conducting. Yet, in a condition of rest the metal coating, however thin, screens the inside perfectly.

Another important fact to note is that in similar studies, general ideas about static shielding don't apply when there's a gas involved. This is clear from the following experiment: a short, wide glass tube is taken and coated with a thick layer of bronze powder, only allowing a bit of light to shine through. The tube is highly vacuumed and hung from a wire with a metal clamp. When the wire is connected to one of the coil terminals, the gas inside the tube ignites despite the metal coating. In this case, the metal clearly doesn't shield the gas inside like it should, even though it’s very thin and not a good conductor. However, when at rest, the metal coating, no matter how thin, perfectly shields the inside.

One of the most interesting results arrived at in pursuing these experiments, is the demonstration of the fact that a gaseous medium, upon which vibration is impressed by rapid changes of electrostatic potential, is rigid. In illustration of this result an experiment made by Mr. Tesla may by cited:—A glass tube about one inch in diameter and three feet long, with outside condenser coatings on the ends, was exhausted to a certain point, when, the tube being suspended freely from a wire connecting the upper coating to one of the terminals of the coil, the discharge appeared in the form of a luminous thread passing through the axis of the tube. Usually the thread was sharply defined in the upper part of the tube and lost itself in the lower part. When a magnet or the finger was quickly passed near the upper part of the luminous thread, it was brought out of position by magnetic or electrostatic influence, and a transversal vibration like that of a suspended cord, with one or more distinct nodes, was set up, which lasted for a few minutes and gradually died out. By suspending from the lower condenser coating metal plates of different sizes, the speed of the vibration was varied. This vibration would seem to show beyond doubt that the thread possessed rigidity, at least to transversal displacements.

One of the most interesting outcomes from these experiments is the demonstration that a gas, when vibrations are introduced by rapid changes in electrostatic potential, behaves like a rigid medium. To illustrate this, consider an experiment conducted by Mr. Tesla: A glass tube about one inch in diameter and three feet long, with condenser coatings on the ends, was evacuated to a certain level. The tube was suspended from a wire that connected the upper coating to one of the terminals of the coil, and the discharge appeared as a glowing thread running through the center of the tube. Typically, the thread was clearly defined in the upper part of the tube but faded away in the lower part. When a magnet or a finger was quickly moved near the upper part of the glowing thread, it was displaced by the magnetic or electrostatic influence, creating a transverse vibration similar to that of a hanging cord, with one or more distinct nodes, which lasted for a few minutes before gradually fading away. By hanging metal plates of different sizes from the lower condenser coating, the vibration speed was adjusted. This vibration clearly suggested that the thread had rigidity, at least with respect to transverse displacements.

Many experiments were tried to demonstrate this property in[Pg 137] air at ordinary pressure. Though no positive evidence has been obtained, it is thought, nevertheless, that a high frequency brush or streamer, if the frequency could be pushed far enough, would be decidedly rigid. A small sphere might then be moved within it quite freely, but if thrown against it the sphere would rebound. An ordinary flame cannot possess rigidity to a marked degree because the vibration is directionless; but an electric arc, it is believed, must possess that property more or less. A luminous band excited in a bulb by repeated discharges of a Leyden jar must also possess rigidity, and if deformed and suddenly released should vibrate.

Many experiments were conducted to show this property in[Pg 137] air at normal pressure. Although no concrete evidence has been found, it is still believed that a high-frequency brush or streamer, if the frequency could be increased enough, would be noticeably rigid. A small sphere could then move within it quite freely, but if it was thrown against it, the sphere would bounce back. An ordinary flame can't have significant rigidity because its vibrations are directionless; however, an electric arc is thought to have that property to some degree. A glowing band created in a bulb by repeated discharges from a Leyden jar should also have rigidity, and if it's deformed and then suddenly let go, it should vibrate.

From like considerations other conclusions of interest are reached. The most probable medium filling the space is one consisting of independent carriers immersed in an insulating fluid. If through this medium enormous electrostatic stresses are assumed to act, which vary rapidly in intensity, it would allow the motion of a body through it, yet it would be rigid and elastic, although the fluid itself might be devoid of these properties. Furthermore, on the assumption that the independent carriers are of any configuration such that the fluid resistance to motion in one direction is greater than in another, a stress of that nature would cause the carriers to arrange themselves in groups, since they would turn to each other their sides of the greatest electric density, in which position the fluid resistance to approach would be smaller than to receding. If in a medium of the above characteristics a brush would be formed by a steady potential, an exchange of the carriers would go on continually, and there would be less carriers per unit of volume in the brush than in the space at some distance from the electrode, this corresponding to rarefaction. If the potential were rapidly changing, the result would be very different; the higher the frequency of the pulses, the slower would be the exchange of the carriers; finally, the motion of translation through measurable space would cease, and, with a sufficiently high frequency and intensity of the stress, the carriers would be drawn towards the electrode, and compression would result.

From similar considerations, other interesting conclusions can be reached. The most likely medium filling the space is one made up of independent carriers suspended in an insulating fluid. If massive electrostatic stresses are assumed to act through this medium, varying quickly in intensity, it would allow for the movement of a body within it, yet remain rigid and elastic, even if the fluid itself lacks these properties. Moreover, assuming that the independent carriers have a configuration such that fluid resistance to motion in one direction is greater than in another, this type of stress would cause the carriers to group together, as they would orient their sides with the highest electric density toward each other. In this position, the fluid resistance to approaching each other would be less than to moving apart. If a steady potential forms a brush in a medium with these characteristics, a continuous exchange of carriers would occur, resulting in fewer carriers per unit volume in the brush than in the space a bit farther from the electrode, reflecting a state of rarefaction. If the potential changes rapidly, the outcome would differ significantly; the higher the frequency of the pulses, the slower the exchange of carriers would be. Eventually, the movement through measurable space would stop, and with a sufficiently high frequency and intensity of stress, the carriers would get drawn toward the electrode, leading to compression.

An interesting feature of these high frequency currents is that they allow of operating all kinds of devices by connecting the device with only one leading wire to the electric source. In fact, under certain conditions it may be more economical to supply the electrical energy with one lead than with two.[Pg 138]

An interesting feature of these high-frequency currents is that they enable the operation of various devices by connecting them with just one wire to the power source. In fact, under certain conditions, it might be more cost-effective to supply electrical energy with one lead instead of two.[Pg 138]

An experiment of special interest shown by Mr. Tesla, is the running, by the use of only one insulated line, of a motor operating on the principle of the rotating magnetic field enunciated by Mr. Tesla. A simple form of such a motor is obtained by winding upon a laminated iron core a primary and close to it a secondary coil, closing the ends of the latter and placing a freely movable metal disc within the influence of the moving field. The secondary coil may, however, be omitted. When one of the ends of the primary coil of the motor is connected to one of the terminals of the high frequency coil and the other end to an insulated metal plate, which, it should be stated, is not absolutely necessary for the success of the experiment, the disc is set in rotation.

An intriguing experiment demonstrated by Mr. Tesla involves using just one insulated line to power a motor based on the rotating magnetic field principle that he developed. A basic version of this motor is created by winding a primary coil around a laminated iron core and placing a secondary coil nearby, with the ends of the secondary coil closed off. A freely movable metal disc is positioned within the influence of the moving field. However, the secondary coil can be left out. When one end of the primary coil is connected to one terminal of the high-frequency coil and the other end is connected to an insulated metal plate—which, it’s worth noting, isn’t absolutely necessary for the experiment to work—the disc begins to spin.

Experiments of this kind seem to bring it within possibility to operate a motor at any point of the earth's surface from a central source, without any connection to the same except through the earth. If, by means of powerful machinery, rapid variations of the earth's potential were produced, a grounded wire reaching up to some height would be traversed by a current which could be increased by connecting the free end of the wire to a body of some size. The current might be converted to low tension and used to operate a motor or other device. The experiment, which would be one of great scientific interest, would probably best succeed on a ship at sea. In this manner, even if it were not possible to operate machinery, intelligence might be transmitted quite certainly.

Experiments like this suggest that it could be possible to run a motor from any spot on Earth using a central power source, solely relying on the Earth itself for connection. If powerful equipment created rapid changes in the Earth's potential, a grounded wire extending to a certain height would carry a current, which could be boosted by linking the free end of the wire to a sizable object. This current could then be transformed into a lower voltage to power a motor or other devices. The experiment, which would hold significant scientific interest, would likely work best on a ship at sea. This way, even if operating machinery isn't feasible, information could definitely be transmitted.

In the course of this experimental study special attention was devoted to the heating effects produced by these currents, which are not only striking, but open up the possibility of producing a more efficient illuminant. It is sufficient to attach to the coil terminal a thin wire or filament, to have the temperature of the latter perceptibly raised. If the wire or filament be enclosed in a bulb, the heating effect is increased by preventing the circulation of the air. If the air in the bulb be strongly compressed, the displacements are smaller, the impacts less violent, and the heating effect is diminished. On the contrary, if the air in the bulb be exhausted, an inclosed lamp filament is brought to incandescence, and any amount of light may thus be produced.

During this experimental study, we focused on the heating effects caused by these currents, which are not only impressive but also suggest the potential for creating a more efficient light source. Simply connecting a thin wire or filament to the coil terminal noticeably raises its temperature. If the wire or filament is placed inside a bulb, the heating effect increases because the air circulation is restricted. If the air in the bulb is highly compressed, the displacements are smaller, the impacts are less intense, and the heating effect decreases. In contrast, if the air in the bulb is removed, a contained lamp filament can reach incandescence, allowing for a substantial amount of light to be produced.

The heating of the inclosed lamp filament depends on so many things of a different nature, that it is difficult to give a generally applicable rule under which the maximum heating[Pg 139] occurs. As regards the size of the bulb, it is ascertained that at ordinary or only slightly differing atmospheric pressures, when air is a good insulator, the filament is heated more in a small bulb, because of the better confinement of heat in this case. At lower pressures, when air becomes conducting, the heating effect is greater in a large bulb, but at excessively high degrees of exhaustion there seems to be, beyond a certain and rather small size of the vessel, no perceptible difference in the heating.

The heating of the enclosed lamp filament relies on so many different factors that it's hard to establish a general rule for when maximum heating[Pg 139] happens. When it comes to bulb size, it's been found that under normal or slightly varying atmospheric pressures, where air acts as a good insulator, the filament heats up more in a small bulb due to better heat retention. At lower pressures, when air becomes a conductor, the heating effect is stronger in a large bulb. However, when the pressure gets extremely low, there doesn't seem to be a noticeable difference in heating beyond a specific and relatively small size of the vessel.

The shape of the vessel is also of some importance, and it has been found of advantage for reasons of economy to employ a spherical bulb with the electrode mounted in its centre, where the rebounding molecules collide.

The shape of the vessel is also important, and it's been found to be beneficial for economic reasons to use a spherical bulb with the electrode placed in the center, where the bouncing molecules collide.

It is desirable on account of economy that all the energy supplied to the bulb from the source should reach without loss the body to be heated. The loss in conveying the energy from the source to the body may be reduced by employing thin wires heavily coated with insulation, and by the use of electrostatic screens. It is to be remarked, that the screen cannot be connected to the ground as under ordinary conditions.

It’s ideal for cost reasons that all the energy supplied to the bulb from the source reaches the heated object without any loss. The loss in transferring energy from the source to the object can be minimized by using thin wires with heavy insulation and by incorporating electrostatic screens. It’s worth noting that the screen cannot be connected to the ground as it typically would be.

In the bulb itself a large portion of the energy supplied may be lost by molecular bombardment against the wire connecting the body to be heated with the source. Considerable improvement was effected by covering the glass stem containing the wire with a closely fitting conducting tube. This tube is made to project a little above the glass, and prevents the cracking of the latter near the heated body. The effectiveness of the conducting tube is limited to very high degrees of exhaustion. It diminishes the energy lost in bombardment for two reasons; first, the charge given up by the atoms spreads over a greater area, and hence the electric density at any point is small, and the atoms are repelled with less energy than if they would strike against a good insulator; secondly, as the tube is electrified by the atoms which first come in contact with it, the progress of the following atoms against the tube is more or less checked by the repulsion which the electrified tube must exert upon the similarly electrified atoms. This, it is thought, explains why the discharge through a bulb is established with much greater facility when an insulator, than when a conductor, is present.

In the bulb itself, a significant amount of the energy supplied may be lost due to molecular collisions with the wire connecting the heated body to the energy source. A notable improvement was made by covering the glass stem with a tightly fitting conducting tube. This tube extends slightly above the glass, preventing cracks near the heated area. The effectiveness of the conducting tube is primarily seen at very high levels of exhaustion. It reduces the energy lost in collisions for two reasons: first, the charge released by the atoms spreads out over a larger area, which lowers the electric density at any point, causing the atoms to be repelled with less energy than if they hit a good insulator; second, because the tube becomes electrified by the first atoms that contact it, the movement of subsequent atoms towards the tube is somewhat hindered by the repulsion exerted by the electrified tube on the similarly electrified atoms. This is thought to explain why the discharge through a bulb occurs much more easily in the presence of an insulator than with a conductor.

During the investigations a great many bulbs of different construction, with electrodes of different material, were experimented upon, and a number of observations of interest were made. Mr.[Pg 140] Tesla has found that the deterioration of the electrode is the less, the higher the frequency. This was to be expected, as then the heating is effected by many small impacts, instead by fewer and more violent ones, which quickly shatter the structure. The deterioration is also smaller when the vibration is harmonic. Thus an electrode, maintained at a certain degree of heat, lasts much longer with currents obtained from an alternator, than with those obtained by means of a disruptive discharge. One of the most durable electrodes was obtained from strongly compressed carborundum, which is a kind of carbon recently produced by Mr. E. G. Acheson, of Monongahela City, Pa. From experience, it is inferred, that to be most durable, the electrode should be in the form of a sphere with a highly polished surface.

During the investigations, many bulbs of various designs, with electrodes made of different materials, were tested, and several interesting observations were made. Mr.[Pg 140] Tesla discovered that the deterioration of the electrode is lessened at higher frequencies. This was expected, as heating occurs through many small impacts rather than fewer, more intense ones that quickly damage the structure. Deterioration is also reduced when the vibration is harmonic. Therefore, an electrode maintained at a certain temperature lasts much longer with currents generated by an alternator compared to those produced by disruptive discharge. One of the most durable electrodes was made from heavily compressed carborundum, a type of carbon recently developed by Mr. E. G. Acheson from Monongahela City, Pa. It can be inferred from experience that to maximize durability, the electrode should be shaped like a sphere with a highly polished surface.

In some bulbs refractory bodies were mounted in a carbon cup and put under the molecular impact. It was observed in such experiments that the carbon cup was heated at first, until a higher temperature was reached; then most of the bombardment was directed against the refractory body, and the carbon was relieved. In general, when different bodies were mounted in the bulb, the hardest fusible would be relieved, and would remain at a considerably lower temperature. This was necessitated by the fact that most of the energy supplied would find its way through the body which was more easily fused or "evaporated."

In some bulbs, refractory materials were placed in a carbon cup and subjected to molecular impact. During these experiments, it was noticed that the carbon cup heated up initially until it reached a higher temperature; then, most of the bombardment focused on the refractory material, allowing the carbon to cool down. Generally, when various materials were placed in the bulb, the hardest and most fusible one would cool down and stay at a significantly lower temperature. This was because most of the energy supplied would pass through the material that melted or "evaporated" more easily.

Curiously enough it appeared in some of the experiments made, that a body was fused in a bulb under the molecular impact by evolution of less light than when fused by the application of heat in ordinary ways. This may be ascribed to a loosening of the structure of the body under the violent impacts and changing stresses.

Curiously enough, some experiments showed that a substance was fused in a bulb under molecular impact with less light emitted than when it was fused using conventional heat methods. This might be due to the loosening of the substance's structure caused by the intense impacts and changing stresses.

Some experiments seem to indicate that under certain conditions a body, conducting or nonconducting, may, when bombarded, emit light, which to all appearances is due to phosphorescence, but may in reality be caused by the incandescence of an infinitesimal layer, the mean temperature of the body being comparatively small. Such might be the case if each single rhythmical impact were capable of instantaneously exciting the retina, and the rhythm were just high enough to cause a continuous impression in the eye. According to this view, a coil operated by disruptive discharge would be eminently adapted to produce such a result, and it is found by experience that its power of[Pg 141] exciting phosphorescence is extraordinarily great. It is capable of exciting phosphorescence at comparatively low degrees of exhaustion, and also projects shadows at pressures far greater than those at which the mean free path is comparable to the dimensions of the vessel. The latter observation is of some importance, inasmuch as it may modify the generally accepted views in regard to the "radiant state" phenomena.

Some experiments suggest that under certain conditions, a body, whether it's a conductor or insulator, can emit light when bombarded. This light appears to be due to phosphorescence but may actually come from the incandescence of an extremely thin layer, with the average temperature of the body being relatively low. This could happen if each individual rhythmic impact could instantly excite the retina, and the rhythm is just fast enough to create a continuous impression in the eye. From this perspective, a coil powered by disruptive discharge would be particularly effective in achieving this result, and experience shows that its ability to excite phosphorescence is remarkably high. It can stimulate phosphorescence at relatively low levels of exhaustion and also casts shadows at pressures much greater than those where the mean free path is similar to the size of the vessel. This last observation is significant, as it could change the generally accepted ideas about "radiant state" phenomena.

A thought which early and naturally suggested itself to Mr. Tesla, was to utilize the great inductive effects of high frequency currents to produce light in a sealed glass vessel without the use of leading in wires. Accordingly, many bulbs were constructed in which the energy necessary to maintain a button or filament at high incandescence, was supplied through the glass by either electrostatic or electrodynamic induction. It was easy to regulate the intensity of the light emitted by means of an externally applied condenser coating connected to an insulated plate, or simply by means of a plate attached to the bulb which at the same time performed the function of a shade.

A thought that came to Mr. Tesla early on was to take advantage of the strong inductive effects of high-frequency currents to produce light in a sealed glass bulb without using wires. As a result, many bulbs were created where the energy needed to keep a button or filament glowing brightly was supplied through the glass by either electrostatic or electrodynamic induction. It was easy to control the brightness of the light by using an external condenser coating linked to an insulated plate, or just by using a plate attached to the bulb that also served as a shade.

A subject of experiment, which has been exhaustively treated in England by Prof. J. J. Thomson, has been followed up independently by Mr. Tesla from the beginning of this study, namely, to excite by electrodynamic induction a luminous band in a closed tube or bulb. In observing the behavior of gases, and the luminous phenomena obtained, the importance of the electrostatic effects was noted and it appeared desirable to produce enormous potential differences, alternating with extreme rapidity. Experiments in this direction led to some of the most interesting results arrived at in the course of these investigations. It was found that by rapid alternations of a high electrostatic potential, exhausted tubes could be lighted at considerable distances from a conductor connected to a properly constructed coil, and that it was practicable to establish with the coil an alternating electrostatic field, acting through the whole room and lighting a tube wherever it was placed within the four walls. Phosphorescent bulbs may be excited in such a field, and it is easy to regulate the effect by connecting to the bulb a small insulated metal plate. It was likewise possible to maintain a filament or button mounted in a tube at bright incandescence, and, in one experiment, a mica vane was spun by the incandescence of a platinum wire.

Mr. Tesla has independently followed up on a subject that Prof. J. J. Thomson has extensively explored in England. This involves exciting a glowing band in a closed tube or bulb through electrodynamic induction. While observing how gases behave and the resulting luminous phenomena, the importance of electrostatic effects was noted, highlighting the need to create extremely high potential differences that alternate very rapidly. Experiments in this area yielded some of the most fascinating results from these investigations. It was discovered that by quickly alternating a high electrostatic potential, exhausted tubes could be lit from a considerable distance away from a conductor connected to a well-designed coil. It was also possible to create an alternating electrostatic field with the coil that filled the entire room, allowing a tube to light up wherever it was placed within the four walls. Phosphorescent bulbs can be activated in this field, and the effect can be easily adjusted by attaching a small insulated metal plate to the bulb. Additionally, it was possible to keep a filament or button mounted in a tube glowing brightly, and in one experiment, a mica vane was made to spin by the heat from a platinum wire.

Coming now to the lecture delivered in Philadelphia and St.[Pg 142] Louis, it may be remarked that to the superficial reader, Mr. Tesla's introduction, dealing with the importance of the eye, might appear as a digression, but the thoughtful reader will find therein much food for meditation and speculation. Throughout his discourse one can trace Mr. Tesla's effort to present in a popular way thoughts and views on the electrical phenomena which have in recent years captivated the scientific world, but of which the general public has even yet merely received an inkling. Mr. Tesla also dwells rather extensively on his well-known method of high-frequency conversion; and the large amount of detail information will be gratefully received by students and experimenters in this virgin field. The employment of apt analogies in explaining the fundamental principles involved makes it easy for all to gain a clear idea of their nature. Again, the ease with which, thanks to Mr. Tesla's efforts, these high-frequency currents may now be obtained from circuits carrying almost any kind of current, cannot fail to result in an extensive broadening of this field of research, which offers so many possibilities. Mr. Tesla, true philosopher as he is, does not hesitate to point out defects in some of his methods, and indicates the lines which to him seem the most promising. Particular stress is laid by him upon the employment of a medium in which the discharge electrodes should be immersed in order that this method of conversion may be brought to the highest perfection. He has evidently taken pains to give as much useful information as possible to those who wish to follow in his path, as he shows in detail the circuit arrangements to be adopted in all ordinary cases met with in practice, and although some of these methods were described by him two years before, the additional information is still timely and welcome.

Now turning to the lecture given in Philadelphia and St.[Pg 142] Louis, it can be noted that to a casual reader, Mr. Tesla's introduction about the significance of the eye might seem like a tangent, but a more thoughtful reader will find plenty to ponder and speculate about. Throughout his talk, you can see Mr. Tesla's attempt to share in an accessible way his thoughts and insights on the electrical phenomena that have recently intrigued the scientific community, yet the general public has only scratched the surface. Mr. Tesla also elaborates quite a bit on his well-known method of high-frequency conversion; the extensive details will be appreciated by students and experimenters exploring this new field. His use of relatable analogies to explain the fundamental principles involved makes it easy for everyone to understand their essence. Moreover, the simplicity with which these high-frequency currents can now be obtained from circuits carrying nearly any type of current, thanks to Mr. Tesla's efforts, is bound to significantly expand this area of research, which holds so many possibilities. As a true philosopher, Mr. Tesla isn't afraid to point out flaws in some of his methods and highlights the avenues he believes are the most promising. He places particular emphasis on using a medium in which the discharge electrodes should be immersed to perfect this conversion method. He has clearly made an effort to provide as much practical information as possible for those who want to follow in his footsteps, detailing the circuit arrangements to be used in common practical situations, and while some of these methods were outlined by him two years earlier, the additional information remains relevant and appreciated.

In his experiments he dwells first on some phenomena produced by electrostatic force, which he considers in the light of modern theories to be the most important force in nature for us to investigate. At the very outset he shows a strikingly novel experiment illustrating the effect of a rapidly varying electrostatic force in a gaseous medium, by touching with one hand one of the terminals of a 200,000 volt transformer and bringing the other hand to the opposite terminal. The powerful streamers which issued from his hand and astonished his audiences formed a capital illustration of some of the views advanced, and afforded Mr. Tesla an opportunity of pointing out the true reasons why,[Pg 143] with these currents, such an amount of energy can be passed through the body with impunity. He then showed by experiment the difference between a steady and a rapidly varying force upon the dielectric. This difference is most strikingly illustrated in the experiment in which a bulb attached to the end of a wire in connection with one of the terminals of the transformer is ruptured, although all extraneous bodies are remote from the bulb. He next illustrates how mechanical motions are produced by a varying electrostatic force acting through a gaseous medium. The importance of the action of the air is particularly illustrated by an interesting experiment.

In his experiments, he first focuses on some phenomena created by electrostatic force, which he believes, based on modern theories, is the most crucial force in nature for us to explore. Right from the start, he presents a striking and novel experiment demonstrating the effects of rapidly changing electrostatic force in a gas. He does this by touching one hand to a 200,000-volt transformer terminal while bringing the other hand close to the opposite terminal. The powerful arcs that shot from his hand, amazing his audiences, served as a great illustration of some of the ideas he presented, and gave Mr. Tesla a chance to explain the real reasons why, with these currents, such a significant amount of energy can pass through the body safely. He then demonstrated through experiment the difference between a steady force and a rapidly changing one acting on a dielectric. This difference is most clearly shown in an experiment where a bulb attached to the end of a wire connected to one of the transformer terminals bursts, even though all outside objects are far from the bulb. Following that, he demonstrates how mechanical movements are created by a changing electrostatic force acting through a gas. The significance of air's role is particularly highlighted by an interesting experiment.

Taking up another class of phenomena, namely, those of dynamic electricity, Mr. Tesla produced in a number of experiments a variety of effects by the employment of only a single wire with the evident intent of impressing upon his audience the idea that electric vibration or current can be transmitted with ease, without any return circuit; also how currents so transmitted can be converted and used for many practical purposes. A number of experiments are then shown, illustrating the effects of frequency, self-induction and capacity; then a number of ways of operating motive and other devices by the use of a single lead. A number of novel impedance phenomena are also shown which cannot fail to arouse interest.

Exploring a different category of phenomena, specifically dynamic electricity, Mr. Tesla conducted several experiments that produced various effects using just a single wire. His clear aim was to demonstrate to his audience that electric vibrations or currents can be easily transmitted without needing a return circuit. He also showcased how these transmitted currents can be converted and utilized for various practical applications. Several experiments were presented, illustrating the effects of frequency, self-induction, and capacity, along with different methods for operating motors and other devices using a single lead. Additionally, some unique impedance phenomena were demonstrated that are sure to capture attention.

Mr. Tesla next dwelt upon a subject which he thinks of great importance, that is, electrical resonance, which he explained in a popular way. He expressed his firm conviction that by observing proper conditions, intelligence, and possibly even power, can be transmitted through the medium or through the earth; and he considers this problem worthy of serious and immediate consideration.

Mr. Tesla then focused on a topic he believes is very important: electrical resonance, which he explained in an easy-to-understand way. He firmly believes that by meeting certain conditions, intelligence and possibly even power can be transmitted through the medium or the earth; and he thinks this issue deserves serious and immediate attention.

Coming now to the light phenomena in particular, he illustrated the four distinct kinds of these phenomena in an original way, which to many must have been a revelation. Mr. Tesla attributes these light effects to molecular or atomic impacts produced by a varying electrostatic stress in a gaseous medium. He illustrated in a series of novel experiments the effect of the gas surrounding the conductor and shows beyond a doubt that with high frequency and high potential currents, the surrounding gas is of paramount importance in the heating of the conductor. He attributes the heating partially to a conduction current and partially to bombardment, and demonstrates that in many cases the[Pg 144] heating may be practically due to the bombardment alone. He pointed out also that the skin effect is largely modified by the presence of the gas or of an atomic medium in general. He showed also some interesting experiments in which the effect of convection is illustrated. Probably one of the most curious experiments in this connection is that in which a thin platinum wire stretched along the axis of an exhausted tube is brought to incandescence at certain points corresponding to the position of the striæ, while at others it remains dark. This experiment throws an interesting light upon the nature of the striæ and may lead to important revelations.

Now focusing on the light phenomena specifically, he explained four distinct types of these phenomena in a unique way that must have been eye-opening for many. Mr. Tesla links these light effects to molecular or atomic impacts caused by changing electrostatic stress in a gas. He demonstrated through a series of innovative experiments how the gas around the conductor significantly affects the heating of the conductor with high-frequency and high-potential currents. He partially attributes the heating to a conduction current and partially to bombardment, showing that in many cases, the heating may be mainly due to bombardment alone. He also noted that the skin effect is greatly influenced by the presence of gas or any atomic medium. Additionally, he showed some intriguing experiments that illustrated the effect of convection. One of the most fascinating experiments in this regard involved a thin platinum wire stretched along the axis of an evacuated tube, which glowed at certain points corresponding to the position of the striations, while at other points, it remained dark. This experiment offers fascinating insights into the nature of the striations and could lead to significant discoveries.

Mr. Tesla also demonstrated the dissipation of energy through an atomic medium and dwelt upon the behavior of vacuous space in conveying heat, and in this connection showed the curious behavior of an electrode stream, from which he concludes that the molecules of a gas probably cannot be acted upon directly at measurable distances.

Mr. Tesla also showed how energy dissipates through an atomic medium and discussed how empty space carries heat. In this context, he highlighted the unusual behavior of an electrode stream, from which he concludes that gas molecules likely can't be affected directly at measurable distances.

Mr. Tesla summarized the chief results arrived at in pursuing his investigations in a manner which will serve as a valuable guide to all who may engage in this work. Perhaps most interest will centre on his general statements regarding the phenomena of phosphorescence, the most important fact revealed in this direction being that when exciting a phosphorescent bulb a certain definite potential gives the most economical result.

Mr. Tesla summarized the main outcomes of his research in a way that will be a helpful guide for anyone who takes on this work. The most engaging part may be his overall comments about phosphorescence, with the key takeaway being that when activating a phosphorescent bulb, a specific voltage provides the most efficient result.

The lectures will now be presented in the order of their date of delivery.

The lectures will now be presented in the order they were delivered.


CHAPTER XXVI.

Experiments with Very High Frequency Alternating Currents and Their Use in Artificial Lighting Methods.[1]

There is no subject more captivating, more worthy of study, than nature. To understand this great mechanism, to discover the forces which are active, and the laws which govern them, is the highest aim of the intellect of man.

There’s no topic more fascinating or more deserving of study than nature. Understanding this incredible system, discovering the forces at work, and learning the laws that control them is the ultimate goal of human intellect.

Nature has stored up in the universe infinite energy. The eternal recipient and transmitter of this infinite energy is the ether. The recognition of the existence of ether, and of the functions it performs, is one of the most important results of modern scientific research. The mere abandoning of the idea of action at a distance, the assumption of a medium pervading all space and connecting all gross matter, has freed the minds of thinkers of an ever present doubt, and, by opening a new horizon—new and unforeseen possibilities—has given fresh interest to phenomena with which we are familiar of old. It has been a great step towards the understanding of the forces of nature and their multifold manifestations to our senses. It has been for the enlightened student of physics what the understanding of the mechanism of the firearm or of the steam engine is for the barbarian. Phenomena upon which we used to look as wonders baffling explanation, we now see in a different light. The spark of an induction coil, the glow of an incandescent lamp, the manifestations of the mechanical forces of currents and magnets are no longer beyond our grasp; instead of the incomprehensible, as before, their observation suggests now in our minds a simple mechanism, and although as to its precise nature all is still conjecture, yet we know that the truth cannot be much longer hidden, and instinctively we feel that the understanding is dawning upon us. We still admire these beautiful phenomena, these[Pg 146] strange forces, but we are helpless no longer; we can in a certain measure explain them, account for them, and we are hopeful of finally succeeding in unraveling the mystery which surrounds them.

Nature has stored an infinite amount of energy in the universe. The ether is the eternal receiver and transmitter of this infinite energy. Recognizing the existence of ether and the roles it plays is one of the most significant outcomes of modern scientific research. Letting go of the idea of action at a distance and accepting a medium that fills all space and connects all solid matter has freed thinkers from a constant doubt, and by revealing a new horizon with unforeseen possibilities, it has renewed interest in familiar phenomena. This has been a major advancement toward understanding the forces of nature and how they manifest to our senses. For those studying physics, it’s like how understanding the mechanism of a firearm or steam engine is for someone less knowledgeable. Phenomena that once seemed like baffling wonders are now viewed differently. The spark from an induction coil, the glow of an incandescent lamp, and the mechanical forces from currents and magnets are no longer beyond our understanding. Instead of being incomprehensible, they now suggest a simple mechanism in our minds. While the exact nature is still uncertain, we know the truth can’t remain hidden much longer, and we instinctively feel that understanding is on the horizon. We still admire these beautiful phenomena and these strange forces, but we are no longer helpless; we can explain and account for them to some extent, and we are hopeful about finally unraveling the mystery that surrounds them.

In how far we can understand the world around us is the ultimate thought of every student of nature. The coarseness of our senses prevents us from recognizing the ulterior construction of matter, and astronomy, this grandest and most positive of natural sciences, can only teach us something that happens, as it were, in our immediate neighborhood: of the remoter portions of the boundless universe, with its numberless stars and suns, we know nothing. But far beyond the limit of perception of our senses the spirit still can guide us, and so we may hope that even these unknown worlds—infinitely small and great—may in a measure become known to us. Still, even if this knowledge should reach us, the searching mind will find a barrier, perhaps forever unsurpassable, to the true recognition of that which seems to be, the mere appearance of which is the only and slender basis of all our philosophy.

How much we can understand the world around us is the ultimate question for every student of nature. The limitations of our senses stop us from grasping the deeper structure of matter, and astronomy, the greatest and most tangible of natural sciences, can only reveal to us events that occur in our immediate surroundings: we know nothing about the distant parts of the vast universe, with its countless stars and suns. However, far beyond what our senses can perceive, our minds can still lead us, so we can hope that even these unknown worlds—infinitely small and vast—might become known to us to some extent. Yet, even if this knowledge comes to us, the curious mind will encounter a barrier, perhaps one that can never be crossed, to the true understanding of what appears to be, for the mere appearance of things is the only fragile foundation of all our philosophy.

Of all the forms of nature's immeasurable, all-pervading energy, which ever and ever changing and moving, like a soul animates the inert universe, electricity and magnetism are perhaps the most fascinating. The effects of gravitation, of heat and light we observe daily, and soon we get accustomed to them, and soon they lose for us the character of the marvelous and wonderful; but electricity and magnetism, with their singular relationship, with their seemingly dual character, unique among the forces in nature, with their phenomena of attractions, repulsions and rotations, strange manifestations of mysterious agents, stimulate and excite the mind to thought and research. What is electricity, and what is magnetism? These questions have been asked again and again. The most able intellects have ceaselessly wrestled with the problem; still the question has not as yet been fully answered. But while we cannot even to-day state what these singular forces are, we have made good headway towards the solution of the problem. We are now confident that electric and magnetic phenomena are attributable to ether, and we are perhaps justified in saying that the effects of static electricity are effects of ether under strain, and those of dynamic electricity and electro-magnetism effects of ether in motion. But this still leaves the question, as to what electricity and magnetism are, unanswered.[Pg 147]

Of all the forms of nature's vast, all-encompassing energy, which is constantly changing and moving, much like a soul that animates a lifeless universe, electricity and magnetism are probably the most intriguing. We experience the effects of gravity, heat, and light every day, and we quickly grow accustomed to them, making them less remarkable over time. However, electricity and magnetism, with their unique connection and seemingly dual nature, stand out among nature's forces. Their phenomena of attraction, repulsion, and rotation, along with their unusual manifestations, spark our curiosity and drive us to explore. What exactly is electricity, and what is magnetism? These questions have been posed repeatedly. The brightest minds have tirelessly worked to solve this puzzle, yet we still haven't fully answered it. While we can't definitively describe what these unique forces are, we have made significant progress toward understanding them. We believe that electric and magnetic phenomena are caused by ether, and it seems reasonable to say that the effects of static electricity result from ether under strain, while dynamic electricity and electromagnetism are effects of ether in motion. But this still leaves the fundamental question of what electricity and magnetism truly are unanswered.[Pg 147]

First, we naturally inquire, What is electricity, and is there such a thing as electricity? In interpreting electric phenomena, we may speak of electricity or of an electric condition, state or effect. If we speak of electric effects we must distinguish two such effects, opposite in character and neutralizing each other, as observation shows that two such opposite effects exist. This is unavoidable, for in a medium of the properties of ether, we cannot possibly exert a strain, or produce a displacement or motion of any kind, without causing in the surrounding medium an equivalent and opposite effect. But if we speak of electricity, meaning a thing, we must, I think, abandon the idea of two electricities, as the existence of two such things is highly improbable. For how can we imagine that there should be two things, equivalent in amount, alike in their properties, but of opposite character, both clinging to matter, both attracting and completely neutralizing each other? Such an assumption, though suggested by many phenomena, though most convenient for explaining them, has little to commend it. If there is such a thing as electricity, there can be only one such thing, and excess and want of that one thing, possibly; but more probably its condition determines the positive and negative character. The old theory of Franklin, though falling short in some respects, is, from a certain point of view, after all, the most plausible one. Still, in spite of this, the theory of the two electricities is generally accepted, as it apparently explains electric phenomena in a more satisfactory manner. But a theory which better explains the facts is not necessarily true. Ingenious minds will invent theories to suit observation, and almost every independent thinker has his own views on the subject.

First, we naturally ask, What is electricity, and does it actually exist? When interpreting electric phenomena, we can refer to electricity or an electric condition, state, or effect. If we talk about electric effects, we have to recognize two such effects, which are opposite in nature and cancel each other out, as observations show that both effects exist. This is unavoidable because, in a medium like ether, we can't create a strain or cause any kind of displacement or motion without producing an equivalent and opposing effect in the surrounding medium. However, if we discuss electricity as a thing, we should probably let go of the idea of having two forms of electricity, since the existence of two such entities is quite unlikely. How can we even imagine there being two things, equal in amount and similar in properties but opposite in nature, both attached to matter, both attracting and completely neutralizing each other? While this assumption is suggested by many phenomena and is quite convenient for explanations, it has little justification. If electricity does exist, there can only be one such entity, with excess or deficiency of that one thing possible, but more likely its condition determines the positive and negative characteristics. Franklin's old theory, although lacking in some aspects, is, from a certain perspective, still the most plausible. Nevertheless, the theory of two forms of electricity is widely accepted because it seems to explain electric phenomena more satisfactorily. But a theory that explains the facts better isn't necessarily true. Creative thinkers will come up with theories to fit observations, and nearly every independent thinker has their own views on the topic.

It is not with the object of advancing an opinion, but with the desire of acquainting you better with some of the results, which I will describe, to show you the reasoning I have followed, the departures I have made—that I venture to express, in a few words, the views and convictions which have led me to these results.

It’s not to push an opinion, but to help you better understand some of the outcomes that I’ll describe, to show you my thought process and the different paths I’ve taken—that I dare to share, in a few words, the beliefs and convictions that have guided me to these results.

I adhere to the idea that there is a thing which we have been in the habit of calling electricity. The question is, What is that thing? or, What, of all things, the existence of which we know, have we the best reason to call electricity? We know that it acts like an incompressible fluid; that there must be a constant quantity of it in nature; that it can be neither produced nor destroyed;[Pg 148] and, what is more important, the electro-magnetic theory of light and all facts observed teach us that electric and ether phenomena are identical. The idea at once suggests itself, therefore, that electricity might be called ether. In fact, this view has in a certain sense been advanced by Dr. Lodge. His interesting work has been read by everyone and many have been convinced by his arguments. His great ability and the interesting nature of the subject, keep the reader spellbound; but when the impressions fade, one realizes that he has to deal only with ingenious explanations. I must confess, that I cannot believe in two electricities, much less in a doubly-constituted ether. The puzzling behavior of the ether as a solid to waves of light and heat, and as a fluid to the motion of bodies through it, is certainly explained in the most natural and satisfactory manner by assuming it to be in motion, as Sir William Thomson has suggested; but regardless of this, there is nothing which would enable us to conclude with certainty that, while a fluid is not capable of transmitting transverse vibrations of a few hundred or thousand per second, it might not be capable of transmitting such vibrations when they range into hundreds of million millions per second. Nor can anyone prove that there are transverse ether waves emitted from an alternate current machine, giving a small number of alternations per second; to such slow disturbances, the ether, if at rest, may behave as a true fluid.

I stick to the idea that there’s something we usually call electricity. The real question is, what exactly is that thing? Or, what among the things we know about is most reasonable to call electricity? We understand that it behaves like an incompressible fluid; there must be a constant amount of it in nature; it can’t be created or destroyed; [Pg 148] and, importantly, the electro-magnetic theory of light and all observed facts indicate that electric and ether phenomena are the same. This leads to the thought that electricity might actually be called ether. In fact, Dr. Lodge has put forth this idea in a certain sense. His engaging work has been read by many, and many have been swayed by his arguments. His remarkable skill and the fascinating subject keep readers intrigued; but once the initial excitement fades, it becomes clear that he’s just offering clever explanations. I have to admit, I can’t believe in two separate electricities, let alone a double-constituted ether. The confusing behavior of ether acting as a solid for light and heat waves, and as a fluid for moving bodies, is indeed best explained by assuming it’s in motion, as Sir William Thomson suggested; however, that aside, there’s no basis to conclude with certainty that while a fluid can’t transmit transverse vibrations of a few hundred or thousand per second, it could somehow transmit those vibrations when they reach hundreds of million millions per second. Additionally, no one can prove that there are transverse ether waves emitted from an alternating current machine that produces a low number of alternations per second; to such slow disturbances, the ether might behave like a true fluid if at rest.

Returning to the subject, and bearing in mind that the existence of two electricities is, to say the least, highly improbable, we must remember, that we have no evidence of electricity, nor can we hope to get it, unless gross matter is present. Electricity, therefore, cannot be called ether in the broad sense of the term; but nothing would seem to stand in the way of calling electricity ether associated with matter, or bound ether; or, in other words, that the so-called static charge of the molecule is ether associated in some way with the molecule. Looking at it in that light, we would be justified in saying, that electricity is concerned in all molecular actions.

Returning to the topic, and considering that the existence of two types of electricity is, at best, highly unlikely, we have to acknowledge that we have no evidence of electricity, nor can we expect to find any, unless tangible matter is present. Therefore, electricity can't really be referred to as ether in the general sense; however, there's nothing preventing us from calling electricity ether that's linked with matter, or bound ether; in other words, the so-called static charge of the molecule is ether somehow connected to the molecule. Viewed this way, it would be reasonable to say that electricity plays a role in all molecular interactions.

Now, precisely what the ether surrounding the molecules is, wherein it differs from ether in general, can only be conjectured. It cannot differ in density, ether being incompressible: it must, therefore, be under some strain or in motion, and the latter is the most probable. To understand its functions, it would be necessary to have an exact idea of the physical con[Pg 149]struction of matter, of which, of course, we can only form a mental picture.

Now, exactly what the ether around the molecules is, and how it differs from ether in general, can only be guessed. It can’t vary in density, since ether is incompressible; therefore, it must be under some strain or in motion, with the latter being more likely. To understand its functions, we would need a clear understanding of the physical structure of matter, which, of course, we can only imagine.

But of all the views on nature, the one which assumes one matter and one force, and a perfect uniformity throughout, is the most scientific and most likely to be true. An infinitesimal world, with the molecules and their atoms spinning and moving in orbits, in much the same manner as celestial bodies, carrying with them and probably spinning with them ether, or in other words, carrying with them static charges, seems to my mind the most probable view, and one which, in a plausible manner, accounts for most of the phenomena observed. The spinning of the molecules and their ether sets up the ether tensions or electrostatic strains; the equalization of ether tensions sets up ether motions or electric currents, and the orbital movements produce the effects of electro and permanent magnetism.

But of all the perspectives on nature, the one that suggests there is one type of matter and one force, with perfect uniformity throughout, is the most scientific and likely to be correct. An incredibly small world, where molecules and their atoms spin and move in orbits much like celestial bodies, carrying and probably spinning with them ether, or in other words, carrying static charges, seems to me to be the most likely explanation. This view plausibly accounts for most of the phenomena we observe. The spinning of the molecules and their ether creates ether tensions or electrostatic strains; the equalization of these tensions generates ether movements or electric currents, and the orbital movements lead to effects of electromagnetic and permanent magnetism.

About fifteen years ago, Prof. Rowland demonstrated a most interesting and important fact, namely, that a static charge carried around produces the effects of an electric current. Leaving out of consideration the precise nature of the mechanism, which produces the attraction and repulsion of currents, and conceiving the electrostatically charged molecules in motion, this experimental fact gives us a fair idea of magnetism. We can conceive lines or tubes of force which physically exist, being formed of rows of directed moving molecules; we can see that these lines must be closed, that they must tend to shorten and expand, etc. It likewise explains in a reasonable way, the most puzzling phenomenon of all, permanent magnetism, and, in general, has all the beauties of the Ampere theory without possessing the vital defect of the same, namely, the assumption of molecular currents. Without enlarging further upon the subject, I would say, that I look upon all electrostatic, current and magnetic phenomena as being due to electrostatic molecular forces.

About fifteen years ago, Prof. Rowland demonstrated a very interesting and important fact: a static charge carried around produces the effects of an electric current. Putting aside the exact nature of the mechanism that causes the attraction and repulsion of currents, and imagining the electrostatically charged molecules in motion, this experimental fact gives us a good understanding of magnetism. We can visualize lines or tubes of force that physically exist, formed by rows of directed moving molecules; we can see that these lines must be closed and that they tend to shorten and expand, etc. It also reasonably explains the most puzzling phenomenon of all, permanent magnetism, and, in general, it has all the advantages of the Ampere theory without the major flaw of it, which is the assumption of molecular currents. Without going further into the subject, I would say that I regard all electrostatic, current, and magnetic phenomena as resulting from electrostatic molecular forces.

The preceding remarks I have deemed necessary to a full understanding of the subject as it presents itself to my mind.

The earlier comments I believe are essential for a complete understanding of the topic as it comes to my mind.

Of all these phenomena the most important to study are the current phenomena, on account of the already extensive and ever-growing use of currents for industrial purposes. It is now a century since the first practical source of current was produced, and, ever since, the phenomena which accompany the flow of currents have been diligently studied, and through the untiring efforts of scientific men the simple laws which govern them have[Pg 150] been discovered. But these laws are found to hold good only when the currents are of a steady character. When the currents are rapidly varying in strength, quite different phenomena, often unexpected, present themselves, and quite different laws hold good, which even now have not been determined as fully as is desirable, though through the work, principally, of English scientists, enough knowledge has been gained on the subject to enable us to treat simple cases which now present themselves in daily practice.

Among all these phenomena, the most crucial to study are the current phenomena, due to the already significant and continuously increasing use of currents for industrial purposes. It has been a century since the first practical source of current was created, and since then, the phenomena associated with the flow of currents have been thoroughly examined. Thanks to the relentless efforts of scientists, the basic laws governing them have[Pg 150] been uncovered. However, these laws only apply when the currents are steady. When the currents change rapidly in strength, different and often unexpected phenomena emerge, leading to entirely different laws that are still not fully understood. Nonetheless, thanks mainly to the work of British scientists, enough knowledge has been acquired to manage simple cases that we encounter in everyday practice.

The phenomena which are peculiar to the changing character of the currents are greatly exalted when the rate of change is increased, hence the study of these currents is considerably facilitated by the employment of properly constructed apparatus. It was with this and other objects in view that I constructed alternate current machines capable of giving more than two million reversals of current per minute, and to this circumstance it is principally due, that I am able to bring to your attention some of the results thus far reached, which I hope will prove to be a step in advance on account of their direct bearing upon one of the most important problems, namely, the production of a practical and efficient source of light.

The unique phenomena related to the changing nature of the currents become much more pronounced when the rate of change is increased. Therefore, studying these currents is significantly easier with the right kind of equipment. With this and other goals in mind, I built alternating current machines that can produce over two million current reversals per minute. It’s mainly because of this that I can share some of the results achieved so far, which I hope will be a significant advancement due to their direct relevance to one of the most crucial problems: creating a practical and efficient source of light.

The study of such rapidly alternating currents is very interesting. Nearly every experiment discloses something new. Many results may, of course, be predicted, but many more are unforeseen. The experimenter makes many interesting observations. For instance, we take a piece of iron and hold it against a magnet. Starting from low alternations and running up higher and higher we feel the impulses succeed each other faster and faster, get weaker and weaker, and finally disappear. We then observe a continuous pull; the pull, of course, is not continuous; it only appears so to us; our sense of touch is imperfect.

The study of rapidly changing currents is very fascinating. Almost every experiment reveals something new. While we can predict some results, many others are unexpected. The experimenter makes a lot of interesting observations. For example, if we take a piece of iron and hold it against a magnet, starting from low frequencies and increasing them, we feel the impulses coming one after another faster and faster, getting weaker and weaker, until they eventually disappear. Then we notice a steady pull; this pull isn't actually continuous; it just seems that way to us because our sense of touch isn't perfect.

We may next establish an arc between the electrodes and observe, as the alternations rise, that the note which accompanies alternating arcs gets shriller and shriller, gradually weakens, and finally ceases. The air vibrations, of course, continue, but they are too weak to be perceived; our sense of hearing fails us.

We can now create an arc between the electrodes and notice that as the alternations increase, the sound that comes with the alternating arcs becomes higher and higher, gradually fades, and eventually stops. The air vibrations still occur, but they are too faint for us to detect; our ability to hear lets us down.

We observe the small physiological effects, the rapid heating of the iron cores and conductors, curious inductive effects, interesting condenser phenomena, and still more interesting light phenomena with a high tension induction coil. All these experiments and observations would be of the greatest interest to the[Pg 151] student, but their description would lead me too far from the principal subject. Partly for this reason, and partly on account of their vastly greater importance, I will confine myself to the description of the light effects produced by these currents.

We see the small physiological effects, the quick heating of the iron cores and conductors, intriguing inductive effects, interesting capacitor phenomena, and even more fascinating light phenomena with a high-voltage induction coil. All these experiments and observations would be extremely interesting to the [Pg 151] student, but describing them would take me too far away from the main topic. Partly for this reason, and partly because they are much more significant, I will focus on describing the light effects produced by these currents.

In the experiments to this end a high tension induction coil or equivalent apparatus for converting currents of comparatively low into currents of high tension is used.

In the experiments for this purpose, a high-tension induction coil or a similar device that converts low currents into high-tension currents is used.

If you will be sufficiently interested in the results I shall describe as to enter into an experimental study of this subject; if you will be convinced of the truth of the arguments I shall advance—your aim will be to produce high frequencies and high potentials; in other words, powerful electrostatic effects. You will then encounter many difficulties, which, if completely overcome, would allow us to produce truly wonderful results.

If you’re really interested in the results I’m going to explain and decide to explore this subject through experiments; if you believe in the validity of the points I’ll make—your goal will be to create high frequencies and high potentials; in other words, strong electrostatic effects. You will face many challenges, but if you can overcome them all, we could achieve some truly amazing results.

First will be met the difficulty of obtaining the required frequencies by means of mechanical apparatus, and, if they be obtained otherwise, obstacles of a different nature will present themselves. Next it will be found difficult to provide the requisite insulation without considerably increasing the size of the apparatus, for the potentials required are high, and, owing to the rapidity of the alternations, the insulation presents peculiar difficulties. So, for instance, when a gas is present, the discharge may work, by the molecular bombardment of the gas and consequent heating, through as much as an inch of the best solid insulating material, such as glass, hard rubber, porcelain, sealing wax, etc.; in fact, through any known insulating substance. The chief requisite in the insulation of the apparatus is, therefore, the exclusion of any gaseous matter.

First, there will be challenges in getting the needed frequencies with mechanical devices, and if they are acquired through other means, different obstacles will arise. Next, it will be tough to provide the necessary insulation without significantly increasing the size of the equipment, because the required voltages are high and, due to the rapid changes, the insulation poses unique difficulties. For example, when gas is present, the discharge can occur through as much as an inch of the best solid insulating materials, such as glass, hard rubber, porcelain, sealing wax, etc., due to molecular bombardment of the gas and the resulting heating; in fact, this can happen with any known insulating substance. Therefore, the main requirement for insulating the equipment is to eliminate any gaseous matter.

In general my experience tends to show that bodies which possess the highest specific inductive capacity, such as glass, afford a rather inferior insulation to others, which, while they are good insulators, have a much smaller specific inductive capacity, such as oils, for instance, the dielectric losses being no doubt greater in the former. The difficulty of insulating, of course, only exists when the potentials are excessively high, for with potentials such as a few thousand volts there is no particular difficulty encountered in conveying currents from a machine giving, say, 20,000 alternations per second, to quite a distance. This number of alternations, however, is by far too small for many purposes, though quite sufficient for some practical applications. This difficulty of insulating is fortunately not a vital drawback;[Pg 152] it affects mostly the size of the apparatus, for, when excessively high potentials would be used, the light-giving devices would be located not far from the apparatus, and often they would be quite close to it. As the air-bombardment of the insulated wire is dependent on condenser action, the loss may be reduced to a trifle by using excessively thin wires heavily insulated.

Overall, my experience shows that materials with the highest specific inductive capacity, like glass, provide relatively poor insulation compared to others that, while being good insulators, have a much lower specific inductive capacity, such as oils. The dielectric losses are likely greater in the former. The challenge of insulating arises primarily when the voltages are extremely high, but with voltages around a few thousand volts, there is no significant difficulty in transferring currents from a device producing, say, 20,000 alternations per second, over considerable distances. However, this number of alternations is generally too low for many applications, although it works well for some practical uses. Thankfully, this insulation challenge is not a critical limitation; it mainly impacts the size of the equipment. When very high voltages are used, the light-emitting devices are usually placed close to the equipment. Since the air bombardment of the insulated wire relies on condenser action, losses can be minimized by using very thin wires that are heavily insulated.[Pg 152]

Another difficulty will be encountered in the capacity and self-induction necessarily possessed by the coil. If the coil be large, that is, if it contain a great length of wire, it will be generally unsuited for excessively high frequencies; if it be small, it may be well adapted for such frequencies, but the potential might then not be as high as desired. A good insulator, and preferably one possessing a small specific inductive capacity, would afford a two-fold advantage. First, it would enable us to construct a very small coil capable of withstanding enormous differences of potential; and secondly, such a small coil, by reason of its smaller capacity and self-induction, would be capable of a quicker and more vigorous vibration. The problem then of constructing a coil or induction apparatus of any kind possessing the requisite qualities I regard as one of no small importance, and it has occupied me for a considerable time.

Another challenge arises from the capacity and self-induction that the coil inherently has. If the coil is large, meaning it has a long length of wire, it usually won't be suitable for very high frequencies. If it's small, it might be well-suited for those frequencies, but the voltage might not be as high as needed. A good insulator, especially one with a low specific inductive capacity, would provide two main benefits. First, it would allow us to create a very small coil that can handle huge voltage differences. Second, that small coil, due to its reduced capacity and self-induction, would be able to vibrate more quickly and energetically. Therefore, I see the challenge of designing a coil or induction device with the necessary qualities as quite significant, and it has been on my mind for a long time.

The investigator who desires to repeat the experiments which I will describe, with an alternate current machine, capable of supplying currents of the desired frequency, and an induction coil, will do well to take the primary coil out and mount the secondary in such a manner as to be able to look through the tube upon which the secondary is wound. He will then be able to observe the streams which pass from the primary to the insulating tube, and from their intensity he will know how far he can strain the coil. Without this precaution he is sure to injure the insulation. This arrangement permits, however, an easy exchange of the primaries, which is desirable in these experiments.

The investigator who wants to repeat the experiments I'll describe using an AC machine that can supply currents of the desired frequency, along with an induction coil, should definitely remove the primary coil and set up the secondary in a way that allows him to look through the tube wrapped around the secondary. This way, he can observe the streams that flow from the primary to the insulating tube, and by their intensity, he will know how much he can push the coil. Without this step, he is likely to damage the insulation. However, this setup allows for easy swapping of the primaries, which is important for these experiments.

The selection of the type of machine best suited for the purpose must be left to the judgment of the experimenter. There are here illustrated three distinct types of machines, which, besides others, I have used in my experiments.

The choice of the type of machine that is most suitable for the task should be left to the discretion of the experimenter. Here, three different types of machines are shown, which, along with others, I have used in my experiments.

Fig. 97 represents the machine used in my experiments before this Institute. The field magnet consists of a ring of wrought iron with 384 pole projections. The armature comprises a steel disc to which is fastened a thin, carefully welded rim of wrought[Pg 153] iron. Upon the rim are wound several layers of fine, well annealed iron wire, which, when wound, is passed through shellac. The armature wires are wound around brass pins, wrapped with silk thread. The diameter of the armature wire in this type of machine should not be more than 1/6 of the thickness of the pole projections, else the local action will be considerable.

Fig. 97 shows the machine I used in my experiments at this Institute. The field magnet is made of a ring of wrought iron with 384 pole projections. The armature consists of a steel disc with a thin, carefully welded rim of wrought iron attached to it. Several layers of fine, well-annealed iron wire are wound around the rim, which is then coated with shellac. The armature wires are wrapped around brass pins covered with silk thread. In this type of machine, the diameter of the armature wire shouldn’t exceed 1/6 of the thickness of the pole projections, or there will be significant local action.

Fig. 97. Fig. 97.

Fig. 98 represents a larger machine of a different type. The field magnet of this machine consists of two like parts which either enclose an exciting coil, or else are independently wound. Each part has 480 pole projections, the projections of one facing those of the other. The armature consists of a wheel of hard bronze, carrying the conductors which revolve between the projections of the field magnet. To wind the armature conductors, I have found it most convenient to proceed in the following manner. I construct a ring of hard bronze of the required size. This ring and the rim of the wheel are provided with the proper number of pins, and both fastened upon a plate. The armature conductors being wound, the pins are cut off and the ends of the conductors fastened by two rings which screw to the[Pg 154] bronze ring and the rim of the wheel, respectively. The whole may then be taken off and forms a solid structure. The conductors in such a type of machine should consist of sheet copper, the thickness of which, of course, depends on the thickness of the pole projections; or else twisted thin wires should be employed.

Fig. 98 shows a larger machine of a different type. The field magnet of this machine has two identical parts that either surround an exciting coil or are wound separately. Each part has 480 pole projections, with the projections of one part facing those of the other. The armature is made of a hard bronze wheel that carries the conductors which spin between the projections of the field magnet. To wind the armature conductors, I found it easiest to follow this method. I make a ring of hard bronze in the required size. This ring and the rim of the wheel are fitted with the right number of pins, and both are secured on a plate. After winding the armature conductors, I cut off the pins and attach the ends of the conductors with two rings that screw onto the bronze ring and the rim of the wheel, respectively. The entire assembly can then be removed, forming a solid structure. The conductors in this type of machine should be made of sheet copper, with the thickness depending on the thickness of the pole projections; alternatively, thin twisted wires can be used.

Fig. 99 is a smaller machine, in many respects similar to the former, only here the armature conductors and the exciting coil are kept stationary, while only a block of wrought iron is revolved.

Fig. 99 is a smaller machine, similar to the previous one, but here the armature conductors and the exciting coil stay in place, while only a block of wrought iron spins.

Fig. 98. Fig. 98.

It would be uselessly lengthening this description were I to dwell more on the details of construction of these machines. Besides, they have been described somewhat more elaborately in The Electrical Engineer, of March 18, 1891. I deem it well, however, to call the attention of the investigator to two things, the importance of which, though self evident, he is nevertheless apt to underestimate; namely, to the local action in the conductors which must be carefully avoided, and to the clearance, which must be small. I may add, that since it is desirable to use very high peripheral speeds, the armature should be of very large diameter in order to avoid impracticable belt speeds. Of[Pg 155] the several types of these machines which have been constructed by me, I have found that the type illustrated in Fig. 97 caused me the least trouble in construction, as well as in maintenance, and on the whole, it has been a good experimental machine.

It would be pointless to drag out this description by going into more details about the construction of these machines. They've been explained in more detail in The Electrical Engineer, from March 18, 1891. However, I think it's important to highlight two things that, while obvious, are often underestimated by researchers: first, the local action in the conductors that must be avoided, and second, the need for small clearance. Additionally, since it’s preferable to use very high peripheral speeds, the armature should be large in diameter to prevent impractical belt speeds. Of[Pg 155] the various types of these machines I’ve built, I’ve found that the type shown in Fig. 97 has caused me the least trouble in both construction and maintenance, and overall, it has been a reliable experimental machine.

In operating an induction coil with very rapidly alternating currents, among the first luminous phenomena noticed are naturally those presented by the high-tension discharge. As the number of alternations per second is increased, or as—the number being high—the current through the primary is varied, the discharge gradually changes in appearance. It would be difficult to describe the minor changes which occur, and the conditions which bring them about, but one may note five distinct forms of the discharge.

In running an induction coil with very fast-changing currents, the first bright effects observed are naturally those caused by the high-voltage discharge. As the number of cycles per second increases, or as the current in the primary coil is adjusted while it’s already high, the discharge gradually changes in appearance. It would be tough to describe the subtle changes that happen and the conditions that cause them, but we can identify five distinct forms of the discharge.

Fig. 99. Fig. 99.

First, one may observe a weak, sensitive discharge in the form of a thin, feeble-colored thread. (Fig. 100a.) It always occurs when, the number of alternations per second being high, the current through the primary is very small. In spite of the excessively small current, the rate of change is great, and the difference of potential at the terminals of the secondary is therefore considerable, so that the arc is established at great distances; but the quantity of "electricity" set in motion is insignificant, barely sufficient to maintain a thin, threadlike arc. It is excessively sensitive and may be made so to such a degree that the mere act of breathing near the coil will affect it, and unless it is perfectly[Pg 156] well protected from currents of air, it wriggles around constantly. Nevertheless, it is in this form excessively persistent, and when the terminals are approached to, say, one-third of the striking distance, it can be blown out only with difficulty. This exceptional persistency, when short, is largely due to the arc being excessively thin; presenting, therefore, a very small surface to the blast. Its great sensitiveness, when very long, is probably due to the motion of the particles of dust suspended in the air.

First, you might notice a weak, sensitive discharge that looks like a thin, faintly colored thread. (Fig. 100a.) This always happens when the number of alternations per second is high and the current through the primary is very low. Even though the current is extremely small, the rate of change is significant, leading to a considerable potential difference at the terminals of the secondary. As a result, the arc can form at great distances, but the amount of "electricity" generated is minimal, just enough to keep a thin, threadlike arc going. It is extremely sensitive and can be affected just by someone breathing near the coil. Unless it is perfectly[Pg 156] shielded from drafts, it constantly flickers around. However, in this form, it is very persistent. When the terminals are brought to about one-third of the striking distance, it can only be extinguished with difficulty. This unusual persistence, when short, is mainly because the arc is very thin, thus presenting a tiny surface to the airflow. Its high sensitivity, when considerably long, is likely due to the movement of dust particles suspended in the air.

Fig. 100a, 100b.
Fig. 100a.Fig. 100b.

When the current through the primary is increased, the discharge gets broader and stronger, and the effect of the capacity of the coil becomes visible until, finally, under proper conditions, a white flaming arc, Fig. 100B, often as thick as one's finger, and striking across the whole coil, is produced. It develops remarkable heat, and may be further characterized by the absence of the high note which accompanies the less powerful discharges. To take a shock from the coil under these conditions would not be advisable, although under different conditions, the potential being much higher, a shock from the coil may be taken with impunity. To produce this kind of discharge the number of alternations per second must not be too great for the coil used; and, generally speaking, certain relations between capacity, self-induction and frequency must be observed.

When the current through the primary increases, the discharge becomes broader and stronger, and the coil's capacity effects become noticeable until, under the right conditions, a white flaming arc, Fig. 100B, often as thick as a finger and spanning the entire coil, is created. It produces significant heat and is also marked by the absence of the high-pitched sound that comes with less powerful discharges. Taking a shock from the coil in these conditions is not advisable, although under different circumstances, where the potential is much higher, a shock from the coil can be taken safely. To produce this type of discharge, the number of alternations per second must not be too high for the coil being used; generally, certain relationships between capacity, self-induction, and frequency must be maintained.

The importance of these elements in an alternate current circuit is now well-known, and under ordinary conditions, the general rules are applicable. But in an induction coil exceptional conditions prevail. First, the self-induction is of little importance before the arc is established, when it asserts itself, but perhaps never as prominently as in ordinary alternate current circuits, because the capacity is distributed all along the coil, and by reason of the fact that the coil usually discharges through very great resistances; hence the currents are exceptionally small. Secondly,[Pg 157] the capacity goes on increasing continually as the potential rises, in consequence of absorption which takes place to a considerable extent. Owing to this there exists no critical relationship between these quantities, and ordinary rules would not seem to be applicable. As the potential is increased either in consequence of the increased frequency or of the increased current through the primary, the amount of the energy stored becomes greater and greater, and the capacity gains more and more in importance. Up to a certain point the capacity is beneficial, but after that it begins to be an enormous drawback. It follows from this that each coil gives the best result with a given frequency and primary current. A very large coil, when operated with currents of very high frequency, may not give as much as 1/8 inch spark. By adding capacity to the terminals, the condition may be improved, but what the coil really wants is a lower frequency.

The significance of these elements in an alternating current circuit is now widely recognized, and under normal conditions, the general rules apply. However, in an induction coil, unique conditions exist. First, self-induction is not very important before the arc is formed; it does become relevant once the arc is established, but arguably not as much as in typical alternating current circuits. This is because the capacity is spread throughout the coil, and the coil usually discharges through very high resistances, resulting in particularly small currents. Secondly,[Pg 157] the capacity continuously increases as the potential rises, primarily due to absorption, which occurs to a significant degree. As a result, there is no critical relationship between these quantities, making ordinary rules appear inapplicable. As the potential increases—either from higher frequency or from increased current through the primary—the amount of energy stored rises significantly, and the importance of capacity escalates. Up to a certain point, capacity is beneficial, but beyond that, it becomes a major disadvantage. This indicates that each coil achieves the best performance at a specific frequency and primary current. A very large coil, when operated with very high frequency currents, might not even produce a spark greater than 1/8 inch. Adding capacity to the terminals could improve the situation, but what the coil truly needs is a lower frequency.

When the flaming discharge occurs, the conditions are evidently such that the greatest current is made to flow through the circuit. These conditions may be attained by varying the frequency within wide limits, but the highest frequency at which the flaming arc can still be produced, determines, for a given primary current, the maximum striking distance of the coil. In the flaming discharge the eclat effect of the capacity is not perceptible; the rate at which the energy is being stored then just equals the rate at which it can be disposed of through the circuit. This kind of discharge is the severest test for a coil; the break, when it occurs, is of the nature of that in an overcharged Leyden jar. To give a rough approximation I would state that, with an ordinary coil of, say 10,000 ohms resistance, the most powerful arc would be produced with about 12,000 alternations per second.

When the flaming discharge happens, it’s clear that the conditions allow the highest current to flow through the circuit. These conditions can be achieved by adjusting the frequency within a broad range, but the highest frequency at which the flaming arc can still form determines the maximum striking distance of the coil for a given primary current. In the flaming discharge, the eclat effect of the capacity isn’t noticeable; the rate at which energy is being stored matches the rate at which it can be released through the circuit. This type of discharge is the toughest test for a coil; the break, when it happens, is similar to that in an overcharged Leyden jar. As a rough estimate, I would say that with an average coil of about 10,000 ohms resistance, the most powerful arc would occur at around 12,000 alternations per second.

When the frequency is increased beyond that rate, the potential, of course, rises, but the striking distance may, nevertheless, diminish, paradoxical as it may seem. As the potential rises the coil attains more and more the properties of a static machine until, finally, one may observe the beautiful phenomenon of the streaming discharge, Fig. 101, which may be produced across the whole length of the coil. At that stage streams begin to issue freely from all points and projections. These streams will also be seen to pass in abundance in the space between the primary and the insulating tube. When the potential is excessively high they will always appear, even if the frequency be low, and even if the primary be surrounded by as much as an inch of wax, hard rub[Pg 158]ber, glass, or any other insulating substance. This limits greatly the output of the coil, but I will later show how I have been able to overcome to a considerable extent this disadvantage in the ordinary coil.

When the frequency goes beyond that level, the potential obviously increases, but the striking distance may still decrease, no matter how contradictory it sounds. As the potential rises, the coil starts to behave more like a static machine, until you can finally observe the stunning phenomenon of streaming discharge, Fig. 101, which can occur along the entire length of the coil. At that point, streams begin to emerge freely from all points and protrusions. These streams can also be seen flowing abundantly in the space between the primary and the insulating tube. When the potential is extremely high, they will always appear, even if the frequency is low, and even if the primary is surrounded by an inch of wax, hard rubber, glass, or any other insulating material. This significantly limits the output of the coil, but I will show later how I have managed to largely overcome this disadvantage in the standard coil.

Besides the potential, the intensity of the streams depends on the frequency; but if the coil be very large they show themselves, no matter how low the frequencies used. For instance, in a very large coil of a resistance of 67,000 ohms, constructed by me some time ago, they appear with as low as 100 alternations per second and less, the insulation of the secondary being 3/4 inch of ebonite. When very intense they produce a noise similar to that produced by the charging of a Holtz machine, but much more powerful, and they emit a strong smell of ozone. The lower the frequency, the more apt they are to suddenly injure the coil. With excessively high frequencies they may pass freely without producing any other effect than to heat the insulation slowly and uniformly.

Besides the potential, the strength of the streams depends on the frequency; however, if the coil is very large, they can still show up regardless of how low the frequencies are. For example, in a very large coil with a resistance of 67,000 ohms that I built some time ago, they appear with frequencies as low as 100 alternations per second and even lower, with the insulation of the secondary being 3/4 inch of ebonite. When they're very intense, they create a noise similar to that made by charging a Holtz machine, but it's much more powerful, and they give off a strong smell of ozone. The lower the frequency, the more likely they are to suddenly damage the coil. At excessively high frequencies, they can pass through without causing any other effect than slowly and evenly heating the insulation.

Fig. 101, 102.
Fig. 101.Fig. 102.

The existence of these streams shows the importance of constructing an expensive coil so as to permit of one's seeing through the tube surrounding the primary, and the latter should be easily exchangeable; or else the space between the primary and secondary should be completely filled up with insulating material so as to exclude all air. The non-observance of this simple rule in the construction of commercial coils is responsible for the destruction of many an expensive coil.

The presence of these streams highlights the need to build an expensive coil that allows for clear visibility through the tube surrounding the primary. This primary should be easily replaceable; otherwise, the area between the primary and secondary should be filled completely with insulating material to eliminate all air. Ignoring this straightforward rule in the design of commercial coils has led to the failure of many costly coils.

At the stage when the streaming discharge occurs, or with somewhat higher frequencies, one may, by approaching the terminals quite nearly, and regulating properly the effect of capacity, produce a veritable spray of small silver-white sparks, or a bunch of excessively thin silvery threads (Fig. 102) amidst a powerful brush—each spark or thread possibly corresponding[Pg 159] to one alternation. This, when produced under proper conditions, is probably the most beautiful discharge, and when an air blast is directed against it, it presents a singular appearance. The spray of sparks, when received through the body, causes some inconvenience, whereas, when the discharge simply streams, nothing at all is likely to be felt if large conducting objects are held in the hands to protect them from receiving small burns.

At the point when the streaming discharge happens, or at slightly higher frequencies, you can get really close to the terminals and adjust the effect of capacitance to create a true spray of small silver-white sparks or a bunch of very thin silvery threads (Fig. 102) amid a powerful brush—each spark or thread possibly representing one alternation. When done under the right conditions, this is probably the most stunning discharge, and if you direct an air blast at it, it looks quite unique. The spray of sparks can cause some discomfort when it hits the body, but when the discharge simply flows, you likely won't feel anything if you hold large conductive objects in your hands to shield them from small burns.

If the frequency is still more increased, then the coil refuses to give any spark unless at comparatively small distances, and the fifth typical form of discharge may be observed (Fig. 103). The tendency to stream out and dissipate is then so great that when the brush is produced at one terminal no sparking occurs, even if, as I have repeatedly tried, the hand, or any conducting object, is held within the stream; and, what is more singular, the luminous stream is not at all easily deflected by the approach of a conducting body.

If the frequency is increased even more, the coil stops producing sparks except at relatively short distances, and you can see the fifth typical type of discharge (Fig. 103). The tendency to spread out and dissipate becomes so strong that when a brush discharge forms at one terminal, no sparking happens, even if, as I've tested many times, a hand or any conductive object is held within the stream. What's even more unusual is that the glowing stream is not easily deflected by the approach of a conductive body.

Fig. 103, 104.
Fig. 103.Fig. 104.

At this stage the streams seemingly pass with the greatest freedom through considerable thicknesses of insulators, and it is particularly interesting to study their behavior. For this purpose it is convenient to connect to the terminals of the coil two metallic spheres which may be placed at any desired distance, Fig. 104. Spheres are preferable to plates, as the discharge can be better observed. By inserting dielectric bodies between the spheres, beautiful discharge phenomena may be observed. If the spheres be quite close and a spark be playing between them, by interposing a thin plate of ebonite between the spheres the spark instantly ceases and the discharge spreads into an intensely luminous circle several inches in diameter, provided the spheres are[Pg 160] sufficiently large. The passage of the streams heats, and, after a while, softens, the rubber so much that two plates may be made to stick together in this manner. If the spheres are so far apart that no spark occurs, even if they are far beyond the striking distance, by inserting a thick plate of glass the discharge is instantly induced to pass from the spheres to the glass in the form of luminous streams. It appears almost as though these streams pass through the dielectric. In reality this is not the case, as the streams are due to the molecules of the air which are violently agitated in the space between the oppositely charged surfaces of the spheres. When no dielectric other than air is present, the bombardment goes on, but is too weak to be visible; by inserting a dielectric the inductive effect is much increased, and besides, the projected air molecules find an obstacle and the bombardment becomes so intense that the streams become luminous. If by any mechanical means we could effect such a violent agitation of the molecules we could produce the same phenomenon. A jet of air escaping through a small hole under enormous pressure and striking against an insulating substance, such as glass, may be luminous in the dark, and it might be possible to produce a phosphorescence of the glass or other insulators in this manner.

At this point, the streams seem to move freely through thick layers of insulators, and it's really interesting to observe their behavior. To do this, it helps to connect two metal spheres to the coil's terminals, which can be placed at any distance apart, as shown in Fig. 104. Spheres are better than plates because the discharge can be seen more clearly. When you place dielectric materials between the spheres, you can observe amazing discharge effects. If the spheres are very close together and a spark is jumping between them, putting a thin ebonite plate between the spheres causes the spark to immediately stop, and the discharge changes into a bright circle several inches wide, as long as the spheres are[Pg 160] large enough. The streams generate heat, and over time, they soften the rubber enough that two plates can stick together. If the spheres are spaced so far apart that no spark occurs, even if they are well outside the striking distance, inserting a thick glass plate causes the discharge to immediately jump from the spheres to the glass as bright streams. It looks almost like these streams are passing *through* the dielectric. But that's not actually true; the streams come from air molecules being violently agitated in the space between the oppositely charged spheres. When the only dielectric present is air, this bombardment continues but is too weak to see. Adding a dielectric significantly amplifies the inductive effect, and the air molecules encounter an obstacle, which intensifies the bombardment and makes the streams visible. If we could somehow create enough agitation of the molecules mechanically, we could replicate the same effect. A jet of air released through a tiny opening under high pressure and hitting an insulating material, like glass, could glow in the dark, potentially causing phosphorescence in the glass or other insulators this way.

The greater the specific inductive capacity of the interposed dielectric, the more powerful the effect produced. Owing to this, the streams show themselves with excessively high potentials even if the glass be as much as one and one-half to two inches thick. But besides the heating due to bombardment, some heating goes on undoubtedly in the dielectric, being apparently greater in glass than in ebonite. I attribute this to the greater specific inductive capacity of the glass, in consequence of which, with the same potential difference, a greater amount of energy is taken up in it than in rubber. It is like connecting to a battery a copper and a brass wire of the same dimensions. The copper wire, though a more perfect conductor, would heat more by reason of its taking more current. Thus what is otherwise considered a virtue of the glass is here a defect. Glass usually gives way much quicker than ebonite; when it is heated to a certain degree, the discharge suddenly breaks through at one point, assuming then the ordinary form of an arc.

The higher the specific inductive capacity of the material in between, the stronger the effect. Because of this, the currents can reach very high potentials even if the glass is one and a half to two inches thick. Besides the heating from bombardment, there’s definitely some heating occurring in the dielectric, which seems to be greater in glass than in ebonite. I think this is due to the higher specific inductive capacity of glass, which means that, with the same voltage difference, it absorbs more energy than rubber. It's like connecting a copper wire and a brass wire of the same size to a battery. The copper wire, although a better conductor, would heat up more because it carries more current. So, what is usually seen as an advantage of glass is actually a drawback in this case. Glass tends to fail much faster than ebonite; once it heats to a certain point, the discharge suddenly occurs at one spot, taking on the usual form of an arc.

The heating effect produced by molecular bombardment of the dielectric would, of course, diminish as the pressure of the[Pg 161] air is increased, and at enormous pressure it would be negligible, unless the frequency would increase correspondingly.

The heating effect caused by molecules hitting the dielectric would, of course, decrease as the air pressure increases, and at very high pressure it would be minimal, unless the frequency also increases accordingly.

It will be often observed in these experiments that when the spheres are beyond the striking distance, the approach of a glass plate, for instance, may induce the spark to jump between the spheres. This occurs when the capacity of the spheres is somewhat below the critical value which gives the greatest difference of potential at the terminals of the coil. By approaching a dielectric, the specific inductive capacity of the space between the spheres is increased, producing the same effect as if the capacity of the spheres were increased. The potential at the terminals may then rise so high that the air space is cracked. The experiment is best performed with dense glass or mica.

In these experiments, you'll often notice that when the spheres are out of reach, bringing a glass plate closer can cause a spark to jump between them. This happens when the spheres' capacity is slightly below the critical value that maximizes the potential difference at the coil's terminals. By bringing a dielectric closer, the specific inductive capacity of the space between the spheres increases, creating the same effect as if the spheres' capacity had increased. The potential at the terminals can then rise high enough to break down the air gap. The experiment works best with dense glass or mica.

Another interesting observation is that a plate of insulating material, when the discharge is passing through it, is strongly attracted by either of the spheres, that is by the nearer one, this being obviously due to the smaller mechanical effect of the bombardment on that side, and perhaps also to the greater electrification.

Another interesting observation is that a plate of insulating material, when the discharge is flowing through it, is strongly attracted to either of the spheres, specifically the closer one. This is clearly because of the smaller mechanical effect of the bombardment on that side, and possibly also due to the greater electrification.

From the behavior of the dielectrics in these experiments, we may conclude that the best insulator for these rapidly alternating currents would be the one possessing the smallest specific inductive capacity and at the same time one capable of withstanding the greatest differences of potential; and thus two diametrically opposite ways of securing the required insulation are indicated, namely, to use either a perfect vacuum or a gas under great pressure; but the former would be preferable. Unfortunately neither of these two ways is easily carried out in practice.

From how the dielectrics behaved in these experiments, we can conclude that the best insulator for these quickly changing currents would be one with the lowest specific inductive capacity and at the same time able to handle the highest potential differences. This points to two completely different methods for achieving the necessary insulation: using either a perfect vacuum or a gas under high pressure; however, the vacuum would be better. Unfortunately, neither of these methods is easy to implement in practice.

It is especially interesting to note the behavior of an excessively high vacuum in these experiments. If a test tube, provided with external electrodes and exhausted to the highest possible degree, be connected to the terminals of the coil, Fig. 105, the electrodes of the tube are instantly brought to a high temperature and the glass at each end of the tube is rendered intensely phosphorescent, but the middle appears comparatively dark, and for a while remains cool.

It’s particularly fascinating to observe the behavior of a very high vacuum in these experiments. If a test tube, equipped with external electrodes and vacuumed to the highest extent, is connected to the terminals of the coil, Fig. 105, the electrodes of the tube heat up instantly, and the glass at both ends of the tube glows brightly, while the middle section looks relatively dark and stays cool for a while.

When the frequency is so high that the discharge shown in Fig. 103 is observed, considerable dissipation no doubt occurs in the coil. Nevertheless the coil may be worked for a long time, as the heating is gradual.

When the frequency is so high that the discharge shown in Fig. 103 is observed, significant dissipation definitely occurs in the coil. However, the coil can be operated for a long time since the heating happens gradually.

In spite of the fact that the difference of potential may be[Pg 162] enormous, little is felt when the discharge is passed through the body, provided the hands are armed. This is to some extent due to the higher frequency, but principally to the fact that less energy is available externally, when the difference of potential reaches an enormous value, owing to the circumstance that, with the rise of potential, the energy absorbed in the coil increases as the square of the potential. Up to a certain point the energy available externally increases with the rise of potential, then it begins to fall off rapidly. Thus, with the ordinary high tension induction coil, the curious paradox exists, that, while with a given current through the primary the shock might be fatal, with many times that current it might be perfectly harmless, even if the frequency be the same. With high frequencies and excessively high potentials when the terminals are not connected to bodies of some size, practically all the energy supplied to the primary is taken up by the coil. There is no breaking through, no local injury, but all the material, insulating and conducting, is uniformly heated.

Even though the voltage difference can be huge, you hardly feel anything when the discharge passes through your body, as long as your hands are protected. This is partly because of the higher frequency, but mainly because less energy is available outside when the voltage difference is extremely high. This happens because as the voltage increases, the energy absorbed in the coil goes up as the square of the voltage. Up to a certain point, the energy available outside increases with the voltage, but then it starts to drop sharply. So, with a typical high-tension induction coil, there’s a strange paradox: with a certain current in the primary, the shock could be deadly, but with many times that current, it could be completely harmless, even with the same frequency. At high frequencies and very high voltages, when the terminals aren't connected to something substantial, almost all the energy supplied to the primary goes into the coil. There's no breakthrough, no local damage, but all the materials, both insulating and conducting, are heated evenly.

Fig. 105, 106.
Fig. 105.Fig. 106.

To avoid misunderstanding in regard to the physiological effect of alternating currents of very high frequency, I think it necessary to state that, while it is an undeniable fact that they are incomparably less dangerous than currents of low frequencies, it should not be thought that they are altogether harmless. What has just been said refers only to currents from an ordinary high tension induction coil, which currents are necessarily very small; if received directly from a machine or from a secondary of low resistance, they produce more or less powerful effects, and may cause serious injury, especially when used in conjunction with condensers.[Pg 163]

To avoid any misunderstanding about the physiological effects of very high-frequency alternating currents, I need to point out that, while it's true that they are much less dangerous than low-frequency currents, they shouldn't be considered completely harmless. What I've just mentioned applies only to currents from a regular high-tension induction coil, which are necessarily very small; if they are taken directly from a machine or from a low-resistance secondary, they can produce significant effects and may cause serious harm, especially when combined with capacitors.[Pg 163]

The streaming discharge of a high tension induction coil differs in many respects from that of a powerful static machine. In color it has neither the violet of the positive, nor the brightness of the negative, static discharge, but lies somewhere between, being, of course, alternatively positive and negative. But since the streaming is more powerful when the point or terminal is electrified positively, than when electrified negatively, it follows that the point of the brush is more like the positive, and the root more like the negative, static discharge. In the dark, when the brush is very powerful, the root may appear almost white. The wind produced by the escaping streams, though it may be very strong—often indeed to such a degree that it may be felt quite a distance from the coil—is, nevertheless, considering the quantity of the discharge, smaller than that produced by the positive brush of a static machine, and it affects the flame much less powerfully. From the nature of the phenomenon we can conclude that the higher the frequency, the smaller must, of course, be the wind produced by the streams, and with sufficiently high frequencies no wind at all would be produced at the ordinary atmospheric pressures. With frequencies obtainable by means of a machine, the mechanical effect is sufficiently great to revolve, with considerable speed, large pin-wheels, which in the dark present a beautiful appearance owing to the abundance of the streams (Fig. 106).

The streaming discharge from a high-tension induction coil is quite different from that of a powerful static machine. In terms of color, it doesn’t have the violet hue of the positive static discharge or the brightness of the negative one, but falls somewhere in between, being alternately positive and negative. However, since the discharge is stronger when the point or terminal is positively charged compared to when it’s negatively charged, the tip of the brush resembles the positive static discharge more, while the base is more like the negative static discharge. In the dark, when the brush is very strong, the base may appear almost white. The wind generated by the escaping streams can be quite intense—sometimes strong enough to be felt from a distance—but, in terms of the amount of discharge, it’s less than what comes from the positive brush of a static machine, and it has a much weaker effect on flames. From this phenomenon, we can infer that as the frequency increases, the wind produced by the streams decreases, and at sufficiently high frequencies, no wind would be produced at normal atmospheric pressures. With frequencies generated by a machine, the mechanical effect is strong enough to spin large pinwheels at considerable speeds, which look stunning in the dark due to the abundance of streams (Fig. 106).

Fig. 107, 108.
Fig. 107.Fig. 108.

In general, most of the experiments usually performed with a static machine can be performed with an induction coil when operated with very rapidly alternating currents. The effects produced, however, are much more striking, being of incomparably[Pg 164] greater power. When a small length of ordinary cotton covered wire, Fig. 107, is attached to one terminal of the coil, the streams issuing from all points of the wire may be so intense as to produce a considerable light effect. When the potentials and frequencies are very high, a wire insulated with gutta percha or rubber and attached to one of the terminals, appears to be covered with a luminous film. A very thin bare wire when attached to a terminal emits powerful streams and vibrates continually to and fro or spins in a circle, producing a singular effect (Fig. 108). Some of these experiments have been described by me in The Electrical World, of February 21, 1891.

In general, most experiments typically done with a static machine can also be carried out using an induction coil when it's operated with very high-frequency alternating currents. The effects produced, however, are much more impressive and have significantly greater power. When a short piece of regular cotton-covered wire, Fig. 107, is connected to one terminal of the coil, the streams coming from all points of the wire can be so intense that they create a noticeable light effect. When the voltages and frequencies are very high, a wire insulated with gutta percha or rubber connected to one of the terminals seems to be surrounded by a glowing film. A very thin bare wire connected to a terminal emits strong streams and continuously vibrates back and forth or spins in a circle, creating a unique effect (Fig. 108). I have described some of these experiments in The Electrical World, from February 21, 1891.

Another peculiarity of the rapidly alternating discharge of the induction coil is its radically different behavior with respect to points and rounded surfaces.

Another notable feature of the quickly changing discharge of the induction coil is its completely different behavior concerning points and rounded surfaces.

If a thick wire, provided with a ball at one end and with a point at the other, be attached to the positive terminal of a static machine, practically all the charge will be lost through the point, on account of the enormously greater tension, dependent on the radius of curvature. But if such a wire is attached to one of the terminals of the induction coil, it will be observed that with very high frequencies streams issue from the ball almost as copiously as from the point (Fig. 109).

If a thick wire, with a ball on one end and a point on the other, is connected to the positive terminal of a static machine, nearly all the charge will escape through the point because of the much greater tension, which depends on the radius of curvature. However, if that same wire is connected to one of the terminals of the induction coil, you'll see that at very high frequencies, streams come out of the ball almost as freely as from the point (Fig. 109).

It is hardly conceivable that we could produce such a condition to an equal degree in a static machine, for the simple reason, that the tension increases as the square of the density, which in turn is proportional to the radius of curvature; hence, with a steady potential an enormous charge would be required to make streams issue from a polished ball while it is connected with a point. But with an induction coil the discharge of which alternates with great rapidity it is different. Here we have to deal with two distinct tendencies. First, there is the tendency to escape which exists in a condition of rest, and which depends on the radius of curvature; second, there is the tendency to dissipate into the surrounding air by condenser action, which depends on the surface. When one of these tendencies is a maximum, the other is at a minimum. At the point the luminous stream is principally due to the air molecules coming bodily in contact with the point; they are attracted and repelled, charged and discharged, and, their atomic charges being thus disturbed, vibrate and emit light waves. At the ball, on the contrary, there is no doubt that the effect is to a great extent produced induc[Pg 165]tively, the air molecules not necessarily coming in contact with the ball, though they undoubtedly do so. To convince ourselves of this we only need to exalt the condenser action, for instance, by enveloping the ball, at some distance, by a better conductor than the surrounding medium, the conductor being, of course, insulated; or else by surrounding it with a better dielectric and approaching an insulated conductor; in both cases the streams will break forth more copiously. Also, the larger the ball with a given frequency, or the higher the frequency, the more will the ball have the advantage over the point. But, since a certain intensity of action is required to render the streams visible, it is obvious that in the experiment described the ball should not be taken too large.

It's hard to imagine that we could create a similar condition to the same extent in a static machine. This is mainly because the tension grows with the square of the density, which is proportional to the radius of curvature. So, with a constant potential, an enormous charge would be necessary to produce streams from a polished ball when it's connected to a point. However, with an induction coil that alternates discharge quickly, the situation is different. Here, we encounter two distinct tendencies. First, there's a tendency to escape that exists in a resting state and depends on the radius of curvature. Second, there's a tendency to dissipate into the surrounding air through condenser action, which depends on the surface. When one of these tendencies is at its maximum, the other is at its minimum. At the point, the visible stream mainly results from air molecules making direct contact with it; they are attracted, repelled, charged, and discharged, which disrupts their atomic charges, causing them to vibrate and emit light waves. In contrast, at the ball, much of the effect is produced inductively, meaning that air molecules don't necessarily come into contact with the ball, although they certainly do at times. To confirm this, we only need to enhance the condenser action, for example, by surrounding the ball at some distance with a better conductor than the environment, with that conductor insulated. Alternatively, we could surround it with a better dielectric and bring in an insulated conductor; in both scenarios, the streams will emerge more abundantly. Also, the larger the ball with a given frequency, or the higher the frequency, the more advantage the ball has over the point. However, since a certain intensity of action is needed to make the streams visible, it's clear that in the experiment described, the ball shouldn't be too large.

In consequence of this two-fold tendency, it is possible to produce by means of points, effects identical to those produced by capacity. Thus, for instance, by attaching to one terminal of the coil a small length of soiled wire, presenting many points and offering great facility to escape, the potential of the coil may be raised to the same value as by attaching to the terminal a polished ball of a surface many times greater than that of the wire.

As a result of this dual tendency, it’s possible to achieve effects with points that are the same as those produced by capacity. For example, by connecting a small piece of dirty wire with many points that allows for easy discharge to one terminal of the coil, the potential of the coil can be increased to the same level as if a polished ball with a surface area much larger than that of the wire were attached to the terminal.

Fig. 109, 110.
Fig. 109.Fig. 110.

An interesting experiment, showing the effect of the points, may be performed in the following manner: Attach to one of the terminals of the coil a cotton covered wire about two feet in length, and adjust the conditions so that streams issue from the wire. In this experiment the primary coil should be preferably placed so that it extends only about half way into the secondary coil. Now touch the free terminal of the secondary with a conducting object held in the hand, or else connect it to an insulated[Pg 166] body of some size. In this manner the potential on the wire may be enormously raised. The effect of this will be either to increase, or to diminish, the streams. If they increase, the wire is too short; if they diminish, it is too long. By adjusting the length of the wire, a point is found where the touching of the other terminal does not at all affect the streams. In this case the rise of potential is exactly counteracted by the drop through the coil. It will be observed that small lengths of wire produce considerable difference in the magnitude and luminosity of the streams. The primary coil is placed sidewise for two reasons: First, to increase the potential at the wire; and, second, to increase the drop through the coil. The sensitiveness is thus augmented.

An interesting experiment demonstrating the effect of the points can be done as follows: Attach a cotton-covered wire about two feet long to one terminal of the coil and set it up so that streams come out from the wire. In this experiment, the primary coil should be positioned so that it extends only about halfway into the secondary coil. Now, touch the free terminal of the secondary with a conductive object held in your hand, or connect it to an insulated[Pg 166] object of some size. This way, the potential on the wire can be significantly increased. The effect will either increase or decrease the streams. If they increase, the wire is too short; if they decrease, it's too long. By adjusting the length of the wire, you can find a point where touching the other terminal doesn't affect the streams at all. In this case, the rise in potential is perfectly balanced by the drop through the coil. It's noticeable that small lengths of wire lead to significant changes in the size and brightness of the streams. The primary coil is placed sideways for two reasons: First, to boost the potential at the wire; and second, to enhance the drop through the coil. This increases sensitivity.

There is still another and far more striking peculiarity of the brush discharge produced by very rapidly alternating currents. To observe this it is best to replace the usual terminals of the coil by two metal columns insulated with a good thickness of ebonite. It is also well to close all fissures and cracks with wax so that the brushes cannot form anywhere except at the tops of the columns. If the conditions are carefully adjusted—which, of course, must be left to the skill of the experimenter—so that the potential rises to an enormous value, one may produce two powerful brushes several inches long, nearly white at their roots, which in the dark bear a striking resemblance to two flames of a gas escaping under pressure (Fig. 110). But they do not only resemble, they are veritable flames, for they are hot. Certainly they are not as hot as a gas burner, but they would be so if the frequency and the potential would be sufficiently high. Produced with, say, twenty thousand alternations per second, the heat is easily perceptible even if the potential is not excessively high. The heat developed is, of course, due to the impact of the air molecules against the terminals and against each other. As, at the ordinary pressures, the mean free path is excessively small, it is possible that in spite of the enormous initial speed imparted to each molecule upon coming in contact with the terminal, its progress—by collision with other molecules—is retarded to such an extent, that it does not get away far from the terminal, but may strike the same many times in succession. The higher the frequency, the less the molecule is able to get away, and this the more so, as for a given effect the potential required is smaller; and a frequency is conceivable—perhaps even obtainable—at[Pg 167] which practically the same molecules would strike the terminal. Under such conditions the exchange of the molecules would be very slow, and the heat produced at, and very near, the terminal would be excessive. But if the frequency would go on increasing constantly, the heat produced would begin to diminish for obvious reasons. In the positive brush of a static machine the exchange of the molecules is very rapid, the stream is constantly of one direction, and there are fewer collisions; hence the heating effect must be very small. Anything that impairs the facility of exchange tends to increase the local heat produced. Thus, if a bulb be held over the terminal of the coil so as to enclose the brush, the air contained in the bulb is very quickly brought to a high temperature. If a glass tube be held over the brush so as to allow the draught to carry the brush upwards, scorching hot air escapes at the top of the tube. Anything held within the brush is, of course, rapidly heated, and the possibility of using such heating effects for some purpose or other suggests itself.

There’s another really interesting feature of the brush discharge created by very quickly alternating currents. To see this, it’s best to swap out the usual terminals of the coil for two metal columns, making sure they are well-insulated with a thick layer of ebonite. It’s also helpful to seal any gaps or cracks with wax so that the brushes can only form at the tops of the columns. If the conditions are finely tuned—which, of course, depends on the skill of the experimenter—so that the potential rises to an extremely high value, you can create two powerful brushes several inches long, nearly white at their bases, which in the dark closely resemble two flames from gas escaping under pressure (Fig. 110). But they don’t just look like flames; they actually are real flames, because they are hot. Sure, they aren’t as hot as a gas burner, but they could be if the frequency and potential were high enough. If produced at around twenty thousand alternations per second, the heat is noticeable even if the potential isn’t excessively high. The heat generated is due to the impact of air molecules against the terminals and against each other. Since, at normal pressures, the mean free path is very small, it’s possible that despite the high initial speed imparted to each molecule when it hits the terminal, its movement—due to collisions with other molecules—is slowed down so much that it doesn’t escape far from the terminal and may hit it multiple times in a row. The higher the frequency, the less the molecule can escape, especially since for a given effect, a lower potential is needed; a frequency could be imagined—perhaps even achievable—at [Pg 167] which essentially the same molecules would keep hitting the terminal. Under these conditions, the exchange of molecules would happen very slowly, and the heat produced at, and very close to, the terminal would be extremely high. But if the frequency continues to increase steadily, the heat generated would start to decrease for obvious reasons. In the positive brush of a static machine, the exchange of molecules is very quick, the flow is constantly in one direction, and there are fewer collisions, so the heating effect must be minimal. Anything that hinders the exchange tends to raise the local heat produced. So, if you hold a bulb over the terminal of the coil to enclose the brush, the air inside the bulb is quickly heated to a high temperature. If a glass tube is held over the brush to let the draft pull the brush upward, scorching hot air escapes from the top of the tube. Anything placed within the brush, of course, heats up quickly, and the idea of using such heating effects for some purpose or another comes to mind.

When contemplating this singular phenomenon of the hot brush, we cannot help being convinced that a similar process must take place in the ordinary flame, and it seems strange that after all these centuries past of familiarity with the flame, now, in this era of electric lighting and heating, we are finally led to recognize, that since time immemorial we have, after all, always had "electric light and heat" at our disposal. It is also of no little interest to contemplate, that we have a possible way of producing—by other than chemical means—a veritable flame, which would give light and heat without any material being consumed, without any chemical process taking place, and to accomplish this, we only need to perfect methods of producing enormous frequencies and potentials. I have no doubt that if the potential could be made to alternate with sufficient rapidity and power, the brush formed at the end of a wire would lose its electrical characteristics and would become flamelike. The flame must be due to electrostatic molecular action.

When thinking about this unique phenomenon of the hot brush, we can't help but feel that a similar process must happen in an ordinary flame. It’s surprising that after all these centuries of being familiar with flames, now, in the age of electric lighting and heating, we’ve finally come to realize that we’ve always had "electric light and heat" available to us. It's also quite interesting to consider that we might have a way to create—without chemical means—a true flame that provides light and heat without consuming any material or undergoing any chemical process. To achieve this, we just need to refine our methods for generating enormous frequencies and potentials. I’m confident that if we could make the potential alternate quickly and powerfully enough, the brush at the end of a wire would lose its electrical properties and become flame-like. The flame must result from electrostatic molecular action.

This phenomenon now explains in a manner which can hardly be doubted the frequent accidents occurring in storms. It is well known that objects are often set on fire without the lightning striking them. We shall presently see how this can happen. On a nail in a roof, for instance, or on a projection of any kind, more or less conducting, or rendered so by dampness, a powerful brush may appear. If the lightning strikes somewhere in the[Pg 168] neighborhood the enormous potential may be made to alternate or fluctuate perhaps many million times a second. The air molecules are violently attracted and repelled, and by their impact produce such a powerful heating effect that a fire is started. It is conceivable that a ship at sea may, in this manner, catch fire at many points at once. When we consider, that even with the comparatively low frequencies obtained from a dynamo machine, and with potentials of no more than one or two hundred thousand volts, the heating effects are considerable, we may imagine how much more powerful they must be with frequencies and potentials many times greater; and the above explanation seems, to say the least, very probable. Similar explanations may have been suggested, but I am not aware that, up to the present, the heating effects of a brush produced by a rapidly alternating potential have been experimentally demonstrated, at least not to such a remarkable degree.

This phenomenon now clearly explains the frequent accidents that happen during storms. It's well-known that objects can catch fire without being directly struck by lightning. We will soon see how this can occur. For example, on a nail in a roof or any kind of protrusion that conducts electricity, especially if it's damp, a strong electrical discharge can occur. If lightning strikes nearby, the immense electrical potential can alternate or fluctuate several million times a second. The air molecules are fiercely attracted and pushed away, and their collisions generate enough heat to start a fire. It's possible for a ship at sea to catch fire in multiple places at once this way. Considering that even with the relatively low frequencies from a dynamo machine and potentials of just one or two hundred thousand volts, the heating effects are significant, we can imagine how much stronger they must be with frequencies and potentials that are much higher; thus, the explanation above seems very likely. Similar ideas may have been proposed, but to my knowledge, the heating effects of a discharge created by a rapidly fluctuating potential haven't been experimentally proven yet, at least not to such an extraordinary extent.

Fig. 111. Fig. 111.

By preventing completely the exchange of the air molecules, the local heating effect may be so exalted as to bring a body to incandescence. Thus, for instance, if a small button, or preferably a very thin wire or filament be enclosed in an unexhausted globe and connected with the terminal of the coil, it may be rendered incandescent. The phenomenon is made much more interesting by the rapid spinning round in a circle of the top of the filament, thus presenting the appearance of a luminous funnel, Fig. 111, which widens when the potential is increased. When the potential is small the end of the filament may perform irregular motions, suddenly changing from one to the other, or it may describe an ellipse; but when the potential is very high it always spins in a circle; and so does generally a thin[Pg 169] straight wire attached freely to the terminal of the coil. These motions are, of course, due to the impact of the molecules, and the irregularity in the distribution of the potential, owing to the roughness and dissymmetry of the wire or filament. With a perfectly symmetrical and polished wire such motions would probably not occur. That the motion is not likely to be due to others causes is evident from the fact that it is not of a definite direction, and that in a very highly exhausted globe it ceases altogether. The possibility of bringing a body to incandescence in an exhausted globe, or even when not at all enclosed, would seem to afford a possible way of obtaining light effects, which, in perfecting methods of producing rapidly alternating potentials, might be rendered available for useful purposes.

By completely stopping the exchange of air molecules, the local heating effect can become so intense that it can cause a body to glow. For example, if you place a small button or, preferably, a very thin wire or filament inside a sealed globe and connect it to the coil’s terminal, it can become incandescent. The effect is even more fascinating when the top of the filament spins in a circle, creating the appearance of a glowing funnel, as shown in Fig. 111, which expands when the voltage increases. When the voltage is low, the end of the filament can move erratically, suddenly changing directions or tracing an elliptical shape; however, with very high voltage, it consistently spins in a circle. Generally, a thin straight wire connected freely to the coil’s terminal behaves the same way. These movements are caused by the impact of air molecules and the uneven distribution of voltage due to the wire's roughness and asymmetry. With a perfectly symmetrical and polished wire, these movements would likely not happen. The randomness of the motion suggests it isn’t caused by other factors, especially since it stops entirely in a highly exhausted globe. The ability to bring a body to incandescence in an exhausted globe, or even when not enclosed, seems to offer a potential method for creating light effects, which, by refining techniques for producing rapidly alternating voltages, could be used for practical applications.

Fig. 112a. Fig. 112a.

In employing a commercial coil, the production of very powerful brush effects is attended with considerable difficulties, for when these high frequencies and enormous potentials are used, the best insulation is apt to give way. Usually the coil is insulated well enough to stand the strain from convolution to convolution, since two double silk covered paraffined wires will withstand a pressure of several thousand volts; the difficulty lies principally in preventing the breaking through from the secondary to the primary, which is greatly facilitated by the streams issuing from the latter. In the coil, of course, the strain is greatest from section to section, but usually in a larger coil there are so many sections that the danger of a sudden giving way is not very great. No difficulty will generally be encountered in that direction, and besides, the liability of injuring the coil internally is very much reduced by the fact that the effect most likely to be produced is simply a gradual heating, which, when far enough[Pg 170] advanced, could not fail to be observed. The principal necessity is then to prevent the streams between the primary and the tube, not only on account of the heating and possible injury, but also because the streams may diminish very considerably the potential difference available at the terminals. A few hints as to how this may be accomplished will probably be found useful in most of these experiments with the ordinary induction coil.

When using a commercial coil, creating very powerful brush effects comes with significant challenges. When high frequencies and huge potentials are involved, even the best insulation can fail. Generally, the coil is insulated enough to handle the strain from one coil wrap to another, as two double silk-covered paraffined wires can withstand several thousand volts. The main issue is preventing the electrical discharge from the secondary to the primary coil, which is made easier by the streams coming from the primary side. Of course, the strain is highest from section to section in the coil, but larger coils usually have enough sections that the risk of sudden failure is low. Typically, there are no major issues in that regard, and the chances of damaging the coil internally are greatly reduced, since the most likely outcome is simply gradual heating, which, if it progresses far enough, would be noticeable. The main requirement is to prevent the electrical streams between the primary and the tube, not only to avoid overheating and potential damage but also because these streams can significantly reduce the potential difference at the terminals. A few tips on how to achieve this will likely be helpful in most experiments with a standard induction coil.

Fig. 112b. Fig. 112b.

One of the ways is to wind a short primary, Fig. 112a, so that the difference of potential is not at that length great enough to cause the breaking forth of the streams through the insulating tube. The length of the primary should be determined by experiment. Both the ends of the coil should be brought out on one end through a plug of insulating material fitting in the tube as illustrated. In such a disposition one terminal of the secondary is attached to a body, the surface of which is determined with the greatest care so as to produce the greatest rise in the potential. At the other terminal a powerful brush appears, which may be experimented upon.

One way is to wind a short primary coil, as shown in Fig. 112a, so that the voltage difference isn't high enough to cause arcs to break through the insulating tube. The length of the primary should be figured out through experimentation. Both ends of the coil should be brought out at one end through a plug of insulating material that fits into the tube, as illustrated. In this setup, one terminal of the secondary is connected to a surface that has been carefully prepared to generate the highest potential. At the other terminal, a strong brush is available for experimentation.

The above plan necessitates the employment of a primary of comparatively small size, and it is apt to heat when powerful effects are desirable for a certain length of time. In such a case it is better to employ a larger coil, Fig. 112b, and introduce it from one side of the tube, until the streams begin to appear. In this case the nearest terminal of the secondary may be connected to the primary or to the ground, which is practically the same thing, if the primary is connected directly to the machine. In the case of ground connections it is well to determine experimentally the frequency which is best suited under the conditions of the test. Another way of obviating the streams, more or less, is to[Pg 171] make the primary in sections and supply it from separate, well insulated sources.

The above plan requires the use of a fairly small primary, which tends to heat up when strong effects are needed for an extended period. In this situation, it's better to use a larger coil, Fig. 112b, and insert it from one side of the tube until the streams start to show. Here, the closest terminal of the secondary can be connected to either the primary or the ground, which practically means the same thing if the primary is directly connected to the machine. When it comes to ground connections, it's advisable to experimentally determine the frequency that works best under the testing conditions. Another way to reduce the streams to some extent is to make the primary in sections and power it from separate, well-insulated sources.

In many of these experiments, when powerful effects are wanted for a short time, it is advantageous to use iron cores with the primaries. In such case a very large primary coil may be wound and placed side by side with the secondary, and, the nearest terminal of the latter being connected to the primary, a laminated iron core is introduced through the primary into the secondary as far as the streams will permit. Under these conditions an excessively powerful brush, several inches long, which may be appropriately called "St. Elmo's hot fire," may be caused to appear at the other terminal of the secondary, producing striking effects. It is a most powerful ozonizer, so powerful indeed, that only a few minutes are sufficient to fill the whole room with the smell of ozone, and it undoubtedly possesses the quality of exciting chemical affinities.

In many of these experiments, when strong effects are needed for a short time, it’s beneficial to use iron cores with the primary coils. In this case, a very large primary coil can be wound and placed next to the secondary coil, with the nearest terminal of the secondary connected to the primary. A laminated iron core is then inserted through the primary into the secondary as far as the current allows. With these conditions, an extremely powerful electric brush, several inches long, which can aptly be called "St. Elmo's hot fire," can appear at the other terminal of the secondary, creating dramatic effects. It acts as a highly effective ozonizer, so effective that just a few minutes is enough to fill the entire room with the scent of ozone, and it definitely has the ability to enhance chemical reactions.

For the production of ozone, alternating currents of very high frequency are eminently suited, not only on account of the advantages they offer in the way of conversion but also because of the fact, that the ozonizing action of a discharge is dependent on the frequency as well as on the potential, this being undoubtedly confirmed by observation.

For producing ozone, high-frequency alternating currents are particularly suitable, not just because of their efficiency in conversion but also because the ozone-producing effect of a discharge relies on both frequency and voltage, which has been clearly supported by observation.

In these experiments if an iron core is used it should be carefully watched, as it is apt to get excessively hot in an incredibly short time. To give an idea of the rapidity of the heating, I will state, that by passing a powerful current through a coil with many turns, the inserting within the same of a thin iron wire for no more than one second's time is sufficient to heat the wire to something like 100° C.

In these experiments, if an iron core is used, it should be closely monitored, as it can get extremely hot in no time. To illustrate how quickly it heats up, I’ll mention that by sending a strong current through a coil with many turns, inserting a thin iron wire for just one second is enough to raise the wire's temperature to about 100° C.

But this rapid heating need not discourage us in the use of iron cores in connection with rapidly alternating currents. I have for a long time been convinced that in the industrial distribution by means of transformers, some such plan as the following might be practicable. We may use a comparatively small iron core, subdivided, or perhaps not even subdivided. We may surround this core with a considerable thickness of material which is fire-proof and conducts the heat poorly, and on top of that we may place the primary and secondary windings. By using either higher frequencies or greater magnetizing forces, we may by hysteresis and eddy currents heat the iron core so far as to bring it nearly to its maximum permeability, which, as Hopkinson has[Pg 172] shown, may be as much as sixteen times greater than that at ordinary temperatures. If the iron core were perfectly enclosed, it would not be deteriorated by the heat, and, if the enclosure of fire-proof material would be sufficiently thick, only a limited amount of energy could be radiated in spite of the high temperature. Transformers have been constructed by me on that plan, but for lack of time, no thorough tests have as yet been made.

But this rapid heating shouldn't discourage us from using iron cores with quickly alternating currents. I've believed for a long time that in industrial distribution through transformers, a plan like the following could work. We can use a relatively small iron core, either divided or possibly even undivided. We can surround this core with a thick layer of fireproof material that doesn’t conduct heat well, and on top of that, we can place the primary and secondary windings. By using either higher frequencies or stronger magnetizing forces, we can heat the iron core through hysteresis and eddy currents to nearly its maximum permeability, which, as Hopkinson has shown, can be up to sixteen times greater than at normal temperatures. If the iron core were completely enclosed, the heat wouldn't damage it, and if the fireproof enclosure were thick enough, only a limited amount of energy could escape despite the high temperature. I have built transformers based on this plan, but due to a lack of time, no thorough tests have been conducted yet.

Another way of adapting the iron core to rapid alternations, or, generally speaking, reducing the frictional losses, is to produce by continuous magnetization a flow of something like seven thousand or eight thousand lines per square centimetre through the core, and then work with weak magnetizing forces and preferably high frequencies around the point of greatest permeability. A higher efficiency of conversion and greater output are obtainable in this manner. I have also employed this principle in connection with machines in which there is no reversal of polarity. In these types of machines, as long as there are only few pole projections, there is no great gain, as the maxima and minima of magnetization are far from the point of maximum permeability; but when the number of the pole projections is very great, the required rate of change may be obtained, without the magnetization varying so far as to depart greatly from the point of maximum permeability, and the gain is considerable.

Another way to adapt the iron core to rapid changes or generally reduce friction losses is to create a continuous magnetization that produces around seven thousand to eight thousand lines per square centimeter through the core. Then, we should use weak magnetizing forces and preferably high frequencies near the point of greatest permeability. This approach can lead to higher conversion efficiency and greater output. I've also used this principle with machines that don't reverse polarity. In these machines, as long as there are only a few pole projections, there isn't much benefit since the highs and lows of magnetization are far from the maximum permeability point. However, when there are a lot of pole projections, the necessary rate of change can be achieved without the magnetization straying too far from the maximum permeability point, leading to significant gains.

The above described arrangements refer only to the use of commercial coils as ordinarily constructed. If it is desired to construct a coil for the express purpose of performing with it such experiments as I have described, or, generally, rendering it capable of withstanding the greatest possible difference of potential, then a construction as indicated in Fig. 113 will be found of advantage. The coil in this case is formed of two independent parts which are wound oppositely, the connection between both being made near the primary. The potential in the middle being zero, there is not much tendency to jump to the primary and not much insulation is required. In some cases the middle point may, however, be connected to the primary or to the ground. In such a coil the places of greatest difference of potential are far apart and the coil is capable of withstanding an enormous strain. The two parts may be movable so as to allow a slight adjustment of the capacity effect.

The arrangements described above only apply to the use of commercial coils as they are typically made. If you want to create a coil specifically for conducting the experiments I mentioned, or to generally withstand the maximum possible voltage difference, then a design like the one shown in Fig. 113 will be beneficial. In this case, the coil consists of two separate parts that are wound in opposite directions, and they connect near the primary. Since the potential in the middle is zero, there isn't much tendency for it to arc to the primary, so less insulation is needed. However, sometimes the middle point may be connected to the primary or to the ground. In such a coil, the areas with the greatest voltage difference are spaced far apart, allowing the coil to endure a huge amount of stress. The two parts can also be movable to enable slight adjustments to the capacity effect.

As to the manner of insulating the coil, it will be found con[Pg 173]venient to proceed in the following way: First, the wire should be boiled in paraffine until all the air is out; then the coil is wound by running the wire through melted paraffine, merely for the purpose of fixing the wire. The coil is then taken off from the spool, immersed in a cylindrical vessel filled with pure melted wax and boiled for a long time until the bubbles cease to appear. The whole is then left to cool down thoroughly, and then the mass is taken out of the vessel and turned up in a lathe. A coil made in this manner and with care is capable of withstanding enormous potential differences.

To insulate the coil, it’s best to follow these steps: First, boil the wire in paraffin until all the air is removed. Next, wind the coil by running the wire through melted paraffin, just to secure the wire. Then, take the coil off the spool, immerse it in a cylindrical container filled with pure melted wax, and boil it for a long time until no more bubbles appear. Let it cool completely, then remove the mass from the container and shape it on a lathe. A coil made this way and with attention to detail can handle huge potential differences.

Fig. 113. Fig. 113.

It may be found convenient to immerse the coil in paraffine oil or some other kind of oil; it is a most effective way of insulating, principally on account of the perfect exclusion of air, but it may be found that, after all, a vessel filled with oil is not a very convenient thing to handle in a laboratory.

It might be useful to dip the coil in paraffin oil or another type of oil; it's a highly effective method of insulation, mainly because it completely keeps out air. However, it could turn out that having a container full of oil isn't very practical to work with in a lab.

If an ordinary coil can be dismounted, the primary may be taken out of the tube and the latter plugged up at one end, filled with oil, and the primary reinserted. This affords an excellent insulation and prevents the formation of the streams.

If a regular coil can be removed, the primary can be taken out of the tube, which should be closed off at one end, filled with oil, and then the primary reinserted. This provides excellent insulation and stops the streams from forming.

Of all the experiments which may be performed with rapidly alternating currents the most interesting are those which concern the production of a practical illuminant. It cannot be denied that the present methods, though they were brilliant advances, are very wasteful. Some better methods must be invented, some more perfect apparatus devised. Modern research has opened new possibilities for the production of an efficient source of light, and the attention of all has been turned in the direction indicated[Pg 174] by able pioneers. Many have been carried away by the enthusiasm and passion to discover, but in their zeal to reach results, some have been misled. Starting with the idea of producing electro-magnetic waves, they turned their attention, perhaps, too much to the study of electro-magnetic effects, and neglected the study of electrostatic phenomena. Naturally, nearly every investigator availed himself of an apparatus similar to that used in earlier experiments. But in those forms of apparatus, while the electro-magnetic inductive effects are enormous, the electrostatic effects are excessively small.

Of all the experiments that can be done with quickly alternating currents, the most fascinating are those focused on creating a practical light source. It's clear that current methods, while impressive advances, are quite wasteful. We need to invent better methods and design more efficient equipment. Modern research has revealed new opportunities for developing an effective light source, and everyone is now looking in the direction pointed out by skilled pioneers. Many people have been swept up by the excitement and drive to innovate, but in their rush to achieve results, some have lost their way. Starting with the goal of generating electromagnetic waves, they may have focused too much on studying electromagnetic effects and overlooked the importance of electrostatic phenomena. Unsurprisingly, almost every researcher used equipment like that from earlier experiments. However, in those types of equipment, while the electromagnetic inductive effects are substantial, the electrostatic effects are extremely minimal.

In the Hertz experiments, for instance, a high tension induction coil is short circuited by an arc, the resistance of which is very small, the smaller, the more capacity is attached to the terminals; and the difference of potential at these is enormously diminished. On the other hand, when the discharge is not passing between the terminals, the static effects may be considerable, but only qualitatively so, not quantitatively, since their rise and fall is very sudden, and since their frequency is small. In neither case, therefore, are powerful electrostatic effects perceivable. Similar conditions exist when, as in some interesting experiments of Dr. Lodge, Leyden jars are discharged disruptively. It has been thought—and I believe asserted—that in such cases most of the energy is radiated into space. In the light of the experiments which I have described above, it will now not be thought so. I feel safe in asserting that in such cases most of the energy is partly taken up and converted into heat in the arc of the discharge and in the conducting and insulating material of the jar, some energy being, of course, given off by electrification of the air; but the amount of the directly radiated energy is very small.

In the Hertz experiments, for example, a high-tension induction coil is short-circuited by an arc, the resistance of which is very low. The lower the resistance, the more capacitance is connected to the terminals, and the potential difference at these terminals is greatly reduced. On the other hand, when the discharge isn't occurring between the terminals, the static effects can be significant, but only qualitatively, not quantitatively, since they rise and fall very quickly and their frequency is low. Hence, in neither case are strong electrostatic effects noticeable. Similar conditions occur in some interesting experiments by Dr. Lodge, where Leyden jars are discharged disruptively. It's been thought— and I believe stated—that in these cases, most of the energy radiates into space. Given the experiments I've described above, that's no longer the case. I confidently state that in these instances, most of the energy is partly absorbed and converted into heat in the arc of the discharge and in the conductive and insulating materials of the jar, with some energy being released by the electrification of the air; however, the amount of energy emitted as radiation is very small.

When a high tension induction coil, operated by currents alternating only 20,000 times a second, has its terminals closed through even a very small jar, practically all the energy passes through the dielectric of the jar, which is heated, and the electrostatic effects manifest themselves outwardly only to a very weak degree. Now the external circuit of a Leyden jar, that is, the arc and the connections of the coatings, may be looked upon as a circuit generating alternating currents of excessively high frequency and fairly high potential, which is closed through the coatings and the dielectric between them, and from the above it is evident that the external electrostatic effects must be very small, even if a[Pg 175] recoil circuit be used. These conditions make it appear that with the apparatus usually at hand, the observation of powerful electrostatic effects was impossible, and what experience has been gained in that direction is only due to the great ability of the investigators.

When a high tension induction coil, running on currents that alternate 20,000 times a second, has its terminals closed through even a tiny jar, almost all the energy goes through the jar's dielectric, which heats up, and the electrostatic effects only show up externally in a very weak manner. The external circuit of a Leyden jar, which includes the arc and the connections of the coatings, can be seen as a circuit generating alternating currents of extremely high frequency and reasonably high potential, which is closed through the coatings and the dielectric between them. Thus, it’s clear that the external electrostatic effects must be very small, even if a [Pg 175] recoil circuit is used. These conditions suggest that with the equipment typically available, observing strong electrostatic effects would be impossible, and any insights gained in this area are solely due to the remarkable skill of the researchers.

But powerful electrostatic effects are a sine qua non of light production on the lines indicated by theory. Electro-magnetic effects are primarily unavailable, for the reason that to produce the required effects we would have to pass current impulses through a conductor, which, long before the required frequency of the impulses could be reached, would cease to transmit them. On the other hand, electro-magnetic waves many times longer than those of light, and producible by sudden discharge of a condenser, could not be utilized, it would seem, except we avail ourselves of their effect upon conductors as in the present methods, which are wasteful. We could not affect by means of such waves the static molecular or atomic charges of a gas, cause them to vibrate and to emit light. Long transverse waves cannot, apparently, produce such effects, since excessively small electro-magnetic disturbances may pass readily through miles of air. Such dark waves, unless they are of the length of true light waves, cannot, it would seem, excite luminous radiation in a Geissler tube, and the luminous effects, which are producible by induction in a tube devoid of electrodes, I am inclined to consider as being of an electrostatic nature.

But strong electrostatic effects are essential for producing light, as theory suggests. Electromagnetic effects are mostly ineffective because to get the needed results, we would need to send current impulses through a conductor, which would stop transmitting them long before we reach the required frequency of the impulses. On the flip side, electromagnetic waves that are much longer than light waves, which can be created by suddenly discharging a capacitor, seem to be unusable, unless we take advantage of their effects on conductors as in current methods, which are inefficient. We can't influence the static molecular or atomic charges of a gas with such waves to make them vibrate and emit light. It seems that long transverse waves cannot produce these effects, since extremely small electromagnetic disturbances can easily pass through miles of air. Such dark waves, unless they are the length of actual light waves, do not seem capable of exciting luminous radiation in a Geissler tube, and the glowing effects that can be generated by induction in a tube without electrodes appear to me to be of an electrostatic nature.

To produce such luminous effects, straight electrostatic thrusts are required; these, whatever be their frequency, may disturb the molecular charges and produce light. Since current impulses of the required frequency cannot pass through a conductor of measurable dimensions, we must work with a gas, and then the production of powerful electrostatic effects becomes an imperative necessity.

To create these bright effects, we need direct electrostatic thrusts; these, no matter their frequency, can disrupt molecular charges and generate light. Since current pulses with the needed frequency can’t travel through a conductor of any significant size, we have to use gas, making the generation of strong electrostatic effects absolutely necessary.

It has occurred to me, however, that electrostatic effects are in many ways available for the production of light. For instance, we may place a body of some refractory material in a closed, and preferably more or less exhausted, globe, connect it to a source of high, rapidly alternating potential, causing the molecules of the gas to strike it many times a second at enormous speeds, and in this manner, with trillions of invisible hammers, pound it until it gets incandescent; or we may place a body in a very highly exhausted globe, in a non-striking vacuum, and, by employing very[Pg 176] high frequencies and potentials, transfer sufficient energy from it to other bodies in the vicinity, or in general to the surroundings, to maintain it at any degree of incandescence; or we may, by means of such rapidly alternating high potentials, disturb the ether carried by the molecules of a gas or their static charges, causing them to vibrate and to emit light.

However, it has come to my attention that electrostatic effects can be utilized in various ways to produce light. For example, we could place a piece of some heat-resistant material inside a closed, preferably mostly empty globe, connect it to a source of high, rapidly alternating voltage, which would make the gas molecules strike it many times a second at incredible speeds. In this way, with trillions of invisible hammers, we could pound it until it starts to glow; or we might place an object in a highly evacuated globe, in a non-striking vacuum, and by using very high frequencies and voltages, transfer enough energy from it

But, electrostatic effects being dependent upon the potential and frequency, to produce the most powerful action it is desirable to increase both as far as practicable. It may be possible to obtain quite fair results by keeping either of these factors small, provided the other is sufficiently great; but we are limited in both directions. My experience demonstrates that we cannot go below a certain frequency, for, first, the potential then becomes so great that it is dangerous; and, secondly, the light production is less efficient.

But, since electrostatic effects depend on potential and frequency, to achieve the strongest results, it's best to increase both as much as possible. It might be feasible to get decent results by keeping one of these factors low, as long as the other one is high enough; however, we have limitations in both areas. My experience shows that we can't drop below a certain frequency because, first, the potential becomes so high that it can be dangerous; and second, light production is less effective.

I have found that, by using the ordinary low frequencies, the physiological effect of the current required to maintain at a certain degree of brightness a tube four feet long, provided at the ends with outside and inside condenser coatings, is so powerful that, I think, it might produce serious injury to those not accustomed to such shocks; whereas, with twenty thousand alternations per second, the tube may be maintained at the same degree of brightness without any effect being felt. This is due principally to the fact that a much smaller potential is required to produce the same light effect, and also to the higher efficiency in the light production. It is evident that the efficiency in such cases is the greater, the higher the frequency, for the quicker the process of charging and discharging the molecules, the less energy will be lost in the form of dark radiation. But, unfortunately, we cannot go beyond a certain frequency on account of the difficulty of producing and conveying the effects.

I’ve discovered that using ordinary low frequencies, the amount of current needed to keep a four-foot tube at a certain brightness, which has external and internal condenser coatings on both ends, is so strong that it could seriously hurt those unaccustomed to such shocks. In contrast, when using twenty thousand alternations per second, the tube can maintain the same brightness without anyone feeling it. This is mainly because a much smaller voltage is needed to achieve the same light effect, along with the higher efficiency in light production. Clearly, in these cases, efficiency increases with higher frequencies since faster charging and discharging of the molecules means less energy is wasted as dark radiation. However, unfortunately, we can’t exceed a certain frequency due to the challenges of producing and transmitting those effects.

I have stated above that a body inclosed in an unexhausted bulb may be intensely heated by simply connecting it with a source of rapidly alternating potential. The heating in such a case is, in all probability, due mostly to the bombardment of the molecules of the gas contained in the bulb. When the bulb is exhausted, the heating of the body is much more rapid, and there is no difficulty whatever in bringing a wire or filament to any degree of incandescence by simply connecting it to one terminal of a coil of the proper dimensions. Thus, if the well-known apparatus of Prof. Crookes, consisting of a bent platinum wire with[Pg 177] vanes mounted over it (Fig. 114), be connected to one terminal of the coil—either one or both ends of the platinum wire being connected—the wire is rendered almost instantly incandescent, and the mica vanes are rotated as though a current from a battery were used. A thin carbon filament, or, preferably, a button of some refractory material (Fig. 115), even if it be a comparatively poor conductor, inclosed in an exhausted globe, may be rendered highly incandescent; and in this manner a simple lamp capable of giving any desired candle power is provided.

I mentioned earlier that a body enclosed in a vacuum bulb can get really hot just by connecting it to a source of rapidly changing voltage. This heating is likely mainly caused by the impact of the gas molecules inside the bulb. When the bulb is vacuum-sealed, the heating of the body happens much faster, and it’s easy to make a wire or filament glow bright by connecting it to one end of the right-sized coil. For example, if you take the well-known device by Prof. Crookes, which has a bent platinum wire with[Pg 177] vanes over it (Fig. 114), and connect it to one end of the coil—whether connecting one or both ends of the platinum wire—the wire quickly becomes incandescent, and the mica vanes spin as if powered by a battery. A thin carbon filament, or even better, a button made of a heat-resistant material (Fig. 115), even if it isn't a great conductor, can glow brightly when sealed in a vacuum bulb; thus creating a simple lamp that can produce any desired brightness.

The success of lamps of this kind would depend largely on the selection of the light-giving bodies contained within the bulb. Since, under the conditions described, refractory bodies—which are very poor conductors and capable of withstanding for a long time excessively high degrees of temperature—may be used, such illuminating devices may be rendered successful.

The success of lamps like this would mainly rely on the choice of the light-producing elements inside the bulb. Since, under the mentioned conditions, materials that are poor conductors and can endure very high temperatures for extended periods can be used, these lighting devices could be successful.

Fig. 114, 115.
Fig. 114.Fig. 115.

It might be thought at first that if the bulb, containing the filament or button of refractory material, be perfectly well exhausted—that is, as far as it can be done by the use of the best apparatus—the heating would be much less intense, and that in a perfect vacuum it could not occur at all. This is not confirmed by my experience; quite the contrary, the better the vacuum the more easily the bodies are brought to incandescence. This result is interesting for many reasons.

It might seem at first that if the bulb, which has the filament or button made of heat-resistant material, is completely evacuated—that is, as much as possible with the best equipment—the heating would be much less intense, and that in a perfect vacuum it wouldn't happen at all. My experience contradicts this; on the contrary, the better the vacuum, the more easily the materials are brought to glowing. This finding is interesting for many reasons.

At the outset of this work the idea presented itself to me, whether two bodies of refractory material enclosed in a bulb exhausted to such a degree that the discharge of a large induction coil, operated in the usual manner, cannot pass through, could be rendered incandescent by mere condenser action. Obviously, to reach this result enormous potential differences and very high frequencies are required, as is evident from a simple calculation.[Pg 178]

At the beginning of this work, I had the idea of whether two pieces of resistant material enclosed in a bulb, which is so depleted of air that the discharge from a large induction coil can't pass through in the usual way, could be made to glow simply through condenser action. Clearly, to achieve this, we need extremely high potential differences and very high frequencies, as a simple calculation shows.[Pg 178]

But such a lamp would possess a vast advantage over an ordinary incandescent lamp in regard to efficiency. It is well-known that the efficiency of a lamp is to some extent a function of the degree of incandescence, and that, could we but work a filament at many times higher degrees of incandescence, the efficiency would be much greater. In an ordinary lamp this is impracticable on account of the destruction of the filament, and it has been determined by experience how far it is advisable to push the incandescence. It is impossible to tell how much higher efficiency could be obtained if the filament could withstand indefinitely, as the investigation to this end obviously cannot be carried beyond a certain stage; but there are reasons for believing that it would be very considerably higher. An improvement might be made in the ordinary lamp by employing a short and thick carbon; but then the leading-in wires would have to be thick, and, besides, there are many other considerations which render such a modification entirely impracticable. But in a lamp as above described, the leading in wires may be very small, the incandescent refractory material may be in the shape of blocks offering a very small radiating surface, so that less energy would be required to keep them at the desired incandescence; and in addition to this, the refractory material need not be carbon, but may be manufactured from mixtures of oxides, for instance, with carbon or other material, or may be selected from bodies which are practically non-conductors, and capable of withstanding enormous degrees of temperature.

But such a lamp would have a huge advantage over a regular incandescent lamp in terms of efficiency. It's well-known that a lamp's efficiency depends to some extent on how hot the filament gets, and if we could operate a filament at much higher temperatures, the efficiency would be much greater. In a regular lamp, this isn't feasible because the filament would burn out, and experience has shown how far we can safely push the heating. It’s impossible to know just how much higher efficiency could be achieved if the filament could last forever, since research in this area can only go so far; however, it's reasonable to believe that the efficiency could be significantly higher. One improvement to the regular lamp could be using a short, thick piece of carbon, but that would require thicker leading wires, and there are many other factors that make such a change completely impractical. However, in the type of lamp described above, the leading wires can be quite small, and the glowing refractory material can be in the form of blocks with a very small radiating surface, meaning less energy is needed to keep them at the desired temperature. Additionally, the refractory material doesn't have to be carbon; it can be made from mixtures of oxides, like carbon or other materials, or it can come from substances that are virtually non-conductive and can withstand extremely high temperatures.

All this would point to the possibility of obtaining a much higher efficiency with such a lamp than is obtainable in ordinary lamps. In my experience it has been demonstrated that the blocks are brought to high degrees of incandescence with much lower potentials than those determined by calculation, and the blocks may be set at greater distances from each other. We may freely assume, and it is probable, that the molecular bombardment is an important element in the heating, even if the globe be exhausted with the utmost care, as I have done; for although the number of the molecules is, comparatively speaking, insignificant, yet on account of the mean free path being very great, there are fewer collisions, and the molecules may reach much higher speeds, so that the heating effect due to this cause may be considerable, as in the Crookes experiments with radiant matter.[Pg 179]

All of this suggests that it's possible to achieve much higher efficiency with this type of lamp compared to regular lamps. In my experience, it has been shown that the blocks can be heated to high temperatures using much lower voltages than calculations predict, and the blocks can be positioned farther apart. We can assume, and it's likely true, that molecular bombardment plays a significant role in the heating, even if the globe is perfectly evacuated, as I have done; even though the number of molecules is relatively small, the long mean free path results in fewer collisions, allowing molecules to reach much higher speeds. Therefore, the heating effect from this could be significant, similar to what was observed in Crookes' experiments with radiant matter.[Pg 179]

But it is likewise possible that we have to deal here with an increased facility of losing the charge in very high vacuum, when the potential is rapidly alternating, in which case most of the heating would be directly due to the surging of the charges in the heated bodies. Or else the observed fact may be largely attributable to the effect of the points which I have mentioned above, in consequence of which the blocks or filaments contained in the vacuum are equivalent to condensers of many times greater surface than that calculated from their geometrical dimensions. Scientific men still differ in opinion as to whether a charge should, or should not, be lost in a perfect vacuum, or in other words, whether ether is, or is not, a conductor. If the former were the case, then a thin filament enclosed in a perfectly exhausted globe, and connected to a source of enormous, steady potential, would be brought to incandescence.

But it’s also possible that we’re dealing with an increased ability to lose the charge in very high vacuum when the potential is rapidly changing. In that case, most of the heating would come directly from the movement of the charges in the heated bodies. Alternatively, the observed fact might largely be due to the effects I mentioned earlier, which makes the blocks or filaments in the vacuum act like condensers with a much larger surface area than what you’d expect from their geometric dimensions. Scientists still disagree on whether a charge should be lost in a perfect vacuum, or in other words, whether ether is a conductor or not. If it is, then a thin filament inside a completely exhausted globe connected to a source of immense, steady potential would glow.

Fig. 116, 117.
Fig. 116.Fig. 117.

Various forms of lamps on the above described principle, with the refractory bodies in the form of filaments, Fig. 116, or blocks, Fig. 117, have been constructed and operated by me, and investigations are being carried on in this line. There is no difficulty in reaching such high degrees of incandescence that ordinary carbon is to all appearance melted and volatilized. If the vacuum could be made absolutely perfect, such a lamp, although inoperative with apparatus ordinarily used, would, if operated with cur[Pg 180]rents of the required character, afford an illuminant which would never be destroyed, and which would be far more efficient than an ordinary incandescent lamp. This perfection can, of course, never be reached, and a very slow destruction and gradual diminution in size always occurs, as in incandescent filaments; but there is no possibility of a sudden and premature disabling which occurs in the latter by the breaking of the filament, especially when the incandescent bodies are in the shape of blocks.

I've constructed and operated various types of lamps based on the above principle, using refractory materials in the form of filaments, Fig. 116, or blocks, Fig. 117, and I am continuing my research in this area. It's quite easy to achieve such high levels of incandescence that ordinary carbon appears to melt and vaporize. If the vacuum could be made absolutely perfect, this lamp, although not functional with standard equipment, would produce a light source that wouldn’t burn out if operated with the right type of currents. It would be significantly more efficient than a regular incandescent lamp. However, this level of perfection can never truly be achieved, and there will always be a slow wear and gradual size reduction, similar to incandescent filaments. Still, there’s no chance of a sudden failure that happens in the latter due to filament breakage, especially when the incandescent materials are in the shape of blocks.

With these rapidly alternating potentials there is, however, no necessity of enclosing two blocks in a globe, but a single block, as in Fig. 115, or filament, Fig. 118, may be used. The potential in this case must of course be higher, but is easily obtainable, and besides it is not necessarily dangerous.

With these quickly changing potentials, there's no need to enclose two blocks in a globe; a single block, like in Fig. 115, or a filament, as shown in Fig. 118, can be used. The potential in this case will need to be higher, but it's easily achievable, and it's not necessarily dangerous.

Fig. 118. Fig. 118.

The facility with which the button or filament in such a lamp is brought to incandescence, other things being equal, depends on the size of the globe. If a perfect vacuum could be obtained, the size of the globe would not be of importance, for then the heating would be wholly due to the surging of the charges, and all the energy would be given off to the surroundings by radiation. But this can never occur in practice. There is always some gas left in the globe, and although the exhaustion may be carried to the highest degree, still the space inside of the bulb must be considered as conducting when such high potentials are used, and I assume that, in estimating the energy that may be given off from the filament to the surroundings, we may consider[Pg 181] the inside surface of the bulb as one coating of a condenser, the air and other objects surrounding the bulb forming the other coating. When the alternations are very low there is no doubt that a considerable portion of the energy is given off by the electrification of the surrounding air.

The ease with which the button or filament in such a lamp lights up, assuming all other factors are equal, depends on the size of the globe. If a perfect vacuum could be achieved, the size of the globe wouldn’t matter because the heating would be entirely caused by the flow of charges, and all the energy would be radiated away. But this is never possible in reality. There’s always some gas left in the globe, and even if it’s been pumped out significantly, the space inside the bulb acts as a conductor when high voltages are applied. I propose that, when calculating the energy released from the filament to the surroundings, we can think of the inside surface of the bulb as one plate of a capacitor, with the air and other objects around the bulb forming the other plate. At very low frequencies, it’s clear that a significant amount of energy is released by the electrification of the surrounding air.

In order to study this subject better, I carried on some experiments with excessively high potentials and low frequencies. I then observed that when the hand is approached to the bulb,—the filament being connected with one terminal of the coil,—a powerful vibration is felt, being due to the attraction and repulsion of the molecules of the air which are electrified by induction through the glass. In some cases when the action is very intense I have been able to hear a sound, which must be due to the same cause.

To study this topic more effectively, I conducted some experiments using very high voltages and low frequencies. I noticed that when I bring my hand close to the bulb—while the filament is connected to one terminal of the coil—a strong vibration is felt, caused by the attraction and repulsion of air molecules that are electrified by induction through the glass. In some instances, when the effect is particularly strong, I’ve been able to hear a sound, which is likely due to the same reason.

Fig. 119, 120.
Fig. 119.Fig. 120.

When the alternations are low, one is apt to get an excessively powerful shock from the bulb. In general, when one attaches bulbs or objects of some size to the terminals of the coil, one should look out for the rise of potential, for it may happen that by merely connecting a bulb or plate to the terminal, the potential may rise to many times its original value. When lamps are attached to the terminals, as illustrated in Fig. 119, then the capacity of the bulbs should be such as to give the maximum rise of potential under the existing conditions. In this manner one may obtain the required potential with fewer turns of wire.

When the alternations are low, it’s easy to get a really strong shock from the bulb. Generally, when you connect bulbs or sizable objects to the terminals of the coil, you need to be careful about the rise in potential. It can happen that just by connecting a bulb or plate to the terminal, the potential can increase to several times its original value. When lamps are connected to the terminals, as shown in Fig. 119, the capacity of the bulbs should be chosen to allow for the maximum rise in potential given the current conditions. This way, you can achieve the necessary potential with fewer turns of wire.

The life of such lamps as described above depends, of course, largely on the degree of exhaustion, but to some extent also on the shape of the block of refractory material. Theoretically it[Pg 182] would seem that a small sphere of carbon enclosed in a sphere of glass would not suffer deterioration from molecular bombardment, for, the matter in the globe being radiant, the molecules would move in straight lines, and would seldom strike the sphere obliquely. An interesting thought in connection with such a lamp is, that in it "electricity" and electrical energy apparently must move in the same lines.

The lifespan of the lamps mentioned above depends mainly on how exhausted they are, but also somewhat on the shape of the block of refractory material. Theoretically, it[Pg 182] seems that a small sphere of carbon enclosed in a glass sphere wouldn’t degrade from molecular bombardment because the matter inside the globe is radiant, causing the molecules to move in straight lines and rarely strike the sphere at an angle. An intriguing idea related to such a lamp is that "electricity" and electrical energy must seemingly move along the same paths.

Fig. 121a, 121b.
Fig. 121a.Fig. 121b.

The use of alternating currents of very high frequency makes it possible to transfer, by electrostatic or electromagnetic induction through the glass of a lamp, sufficient energy to keep a filament at incandescence and so do away with the leading-in wires. Such lamps have been proposed, but for want of proper apparatus they have not been successfully operated. Many forms of lamps on this principle with continuous and broken filaments have been constructed by me and experimented upon. When using a secondary enclosed within the lamp, a condenser is advantageously combined with the secondary. When the transference is effected by electrostatic induction, the potentials used are, of course, very high with frequencies obtainable from a machine. For instance, with a condenser surface of forty square centimetres,[Pg 183] which is not impracticably large, and with glass of good quality 1 mm. thick, using currents alternating twenty thousand times a second, the potential required is approximately 9,000 volts. This may seem large, but since each lamp may be included in the secondary of a transformer of very small dimensions, it would not be inconvenient, and, moreover, it would not produce fatal injury. The transformers would all be preferably in series. The regulation would offer no difficulties, as with currents of such frequencies it is very easy to maintain a constant current.

The use of very high frequency alternating currents allows for energy transfer through the glass of a lamp via electrostatic or electromagnetic induction, keeping a filament glowing without the need for leading wires. Such lamps have been proposed, but due to a lack of proper equipment, they haven’t been successfully implemented. I have constructed and tested many forms of lamps based on this principle, using both continuous and broken filaments. When utilizing a secondary coil inside the lamp, it's beneficial to combine it with a condenser. When the energy transfer happens through electrostatic induction, the potentials used are very high and come from a machine that can achieve these frequencies. For example, with a condenser surface area of forty square centimeters, which isn’t unreasonably large, and high-quality glass that is 1 mm thick, using currents that alternate twenty thousand times a second requires a potential of about 9,000 volts. While this might seem high, each lamp can be incorporated into the secondary of a small transformer, making it manageable and not capable of causing fatal injury. Ideally, all transformers would be in series. Regulation wouldn’t be problematic, as maintaining a constant current is straightforward with currents at such high frequencies.

In the accompanying engravings some of the types of lamps of this kind are shown. Fig. 120 is such a lamp with a broken filament, and Figs. 121 A and 121 B one with a single outside and inside coating and a single filament. I have also made lamps with two outside and inside coatings and a continuous loop connecting the latter. Such lamps have been operated by me with current impulses of the enormous frequencies obtainable by the disruptive discharge of condensers.

In the accompanying illustrations, you can see some types of lamps like these. Fig. 120 shows a lamp with a broken filament, while Figs. 121 A and 121 B display one with a single outer and inner coating and a single filament. I've also created lamps with two outer and inner coatings and a continuous loop connecting them. I've operated these lamps using current impulses at the incredibly high frequencies produced by the disruptive discharge of capacitors.

The disruptive discharge of a condenser is especially suited for operating such lamps—with no outward electrical connections—by means of electromagnetic induction, the electromagnetic inductive effects being excessively high; and I have been able to produce the desired incandescence with only a few short turns of wire. Incandescence may also be produced in this manner in a simple closed filament.

The disruptive release of energy from a condenser is particularly effective for running these lamps—without any external electrical connections—through electromagnetic induction, which creates extremely high inductive effects; I’ve managed to achieve the desired glow using just a few short wire turns. You can also create incandescence this way with a simple closed filament.

Leaving now out of consideration the practicability of such lamps, I would only say that they possess a beautiful and desirable feature, namely, that they can be rendered, at will, more or less brilliant simply by altering the relative position of the outside and inside condenser coatings, or inducing and induced circuits.

Putting aside the practicality of these lamps for now, I would just like to mention that they have a beautiful and appealing feature: they can be made more or less bright at will by adjusting the positions of the outside and inside condenser coatings, or by changing the inducing and induced circuits.

When a lamp is lighted by connecting it to one terminal only of the source, this may be facilitated by providing the globe with an outside condenser coating, which serves at the same time as a reflector, and connecting this to an insulated body of some size. Lamps of this kind are illustrated in Fig. 122 and Fig. 123. Fig. 124 shows the plan of connection. The brilliancy of the lamp may, in this case, be regulated within wide limits by varying the size of the insulated metal plate to which the coating is connected.

When a lamp is turned on by connecting it to just one terminal of the power source, this can be enhanced by adding a condenser coating to the globe, which also acts as a reflector, and linking it to a sufficiently large insulated body. Lamps like this are shown in Fig. 122 and Fig. 123. Fig. 124 illustrates the connection plan. In this case, the brightness of the lamp can be adjusted over a wide range by changing the size of the insulated metal plate it connects to.

It is likewise practicable to light with one leading wire lamps such as illustrated in Fig. 116 and Fig. 117, by connecting one[Pg 184] terminal of the lamp to one terminal of the source, and the other to an insulated body of the required size. In all cases the insulated body serves to give off the energy into the surrounding space, and is equivalent to a return wire. Obviously, in the two last-named cases, instead of connecting the wires to an insulated body, connections may be made to the ground.

It is also possible to power lamps with a single wire, as shown in Fig. 116 and Fig. 117, by connecting one terminal of the lamp to one terminal of the power source and the other terminal to an insulated object of the appropriate size. In all situations, the insulated object acts as a means to release energy into the surrounding area and functions like a return wire. Clearly, in the last two scenarios described, instead of connecting the wires to an insulated object, you can connect them to the ground.

The experiments which will prove most suggestive and of most interest to the investigator are probably those performed with exhausted tubes. As might be anticipated, a source of such rapidly alternating potentials is capable of exciting the tubes at a considerable distance, and the light effects produced are remarkable.

The experiments that will be the most revealing and interesting to the researcher are likely those conducted with vacuum tubes. As expected, a source of such quickly changing potentials can energize the tubes from a significant distance, and the light effects produced are impressive.

Fig. 122, 123.
Fig. 122.Fig. 123.

During my investigations in this line I endeavored to excite tubes, devoid of any electrodes, by electromagnetic induction, making the tube the secondary of the induction device, and passing through the primary the discharges of a Leyden jar. These tubes were made of many shapes, and I was able to obtain luminous effects which I then thought were due wholly to electromagnetic induction. But on carefully investigating the phenomena I found that the effects produced were more of an electrostatic nature. It may be attributed to this circumstance that this mode of exciting tubes is very wasteful, namely, the primary circuit being closed, the potential, and consequently the electrostatic inductive effect, is much diminished.[Pg 185]

During my research in this area, I tried to excite tubes without any electrodes using electromagnetic induction, making the tube the secondary part of the induction device while passing discharges from a Leyden jar through the primary. These tubes came in various shapes, and I was able to achieve glowing effects, which I initially thought were entirely due to electromagnetic induction. However, upon closer examination of the phenomena, I discovered that the effects were more electrostatic in nature. This might explain why this method of exciting tubes is very inefficient; with the primary circuit closed, the potential—and therefore the electrostatic inductive effect—is significantly reduced.[Pg 185]

When an induction coil, operated as above described, is used, there is no doubt that the tubes are excited by electrostatic induction, and that electromagnetic induction has little, if anything, to do with the phenomena.

When an induction coil, working as described above, is used, there's no doubt that the tubes are energized by electrostatic induction, and that electromagnetic induction has little, if any, connection to the phenomena.

Fig. 124. Fig. 124.

This is evident from many experiments. For instance, if a tube be taken in one hand, the observer being near the coil, it is brilliantly lighted and remains so no matter in what position it is held relatively to the observer's body. Were the action electromagnetic, the tube could not be lighted when the observer's body is interposed between it and the coil, or at least its luminosity should be considerably diminished. When the tube is held exactly over the centre of the coil—the latter being wound in sections and the primary placed symmetrically to the secondary—it may remain completely dark, whereas it is rendered intensely luminous by moving it slightly to the right or left from the centre of the coil. It does not light because in the middle both halves of the coil neutralize each other, and the electric potential is zero. If the action were electromagnetic, the tube should light best in the plane through the centre of the coil, since the electromagnetic effect there should be a maximum. When an arc is established between the terminals, the tubes and lamps in the vicinity of the coil go out, but light up again when the arc is broken, on account of the rise of potential. Yet the electromagnetic effect should be practically the same in both cases.

This is clear from many experiments. For example, if a tube is held in one hand while the observer is near the coil, it lights up brilliantly and stays that way regardless of how it's positioned in relation to the observer's body. If the effect were electromagnetic, the tube couldn't light up when the observer's body is between it and the coil, or at the very least, its brightness should be significantly reduced. When the tube is held directly over the center of the coil—where the coil is wound in sections and the primary coil is placed symmetrically to the secondary coil—it may stay completely dark. However, it becomes intensely bright if moved slightly to the right or left from the center of the coil. It doesn't light up because when it's in the middle, both halves of the coil cancel each other out, resulting in zero electric potential. If the effect were electromagnetic, the tube should light up best in the plane through the center of the coil, since the electromagnetic effect should be at its strongest there. When an arc is formed between the terminals, the tubes and lamps nearby the coil turn off but light up again when the arc is broken, due to the increase in potential. Yet, the electromagnetic effect should be virtually the same in both situations.

By placing a tube at some distance from the coil, and nearer to one terminal—preferably at a point on the axis of the coil—one may light it by touching the remote terminal with an insulated body of some size or with the hand, thereby raising the potential at that terminal nearer to the tube. If the tube is shifted nearer to the coil so that it is lighted by the action of the nearer termi[Pg 186]nal, it may be made to go out by holding, on an insulated support, the end of a wire connected to the remote terminal, in the vicinity of the nearer terminal, by this means counteracting the action of the latter upon the tube. These effects are evidently electrostatic. Likewise, when a tube is placed at a considerable distance from the coil, the observer may, standing upon an insulated support between coil and tube, light the latter by approaching the hand to it; or he may even render it luminous by simply stepping between it and the coil. This would be impossible with electro-magnetic induction, for the body of the observer would act as a screen.

By placing a tube a bit away from the coil and closer to one terminal—ideally at a point along the coil's axis—you can light it by touching the distant terminal with an insulated object of some size or with your hand. This raises the potential at that terminal closer to the tube. If you move the tube closer to the coil so it's lit by the nearby terminal, you can extinguish it by holding the end of a wire connected to the distant terminal on an insulated support near the closer terminal, which counters its effect on the tube. These effects are clearly electrostatic. Similarly, when a tube is placed far from the coil, a person standing on an insulated platform between the coil and the tube can light the tube by bringing their hand close to it; or they can even make it glow just by stepping between it and the coil. This wouldn't be possible with electromagnetic induction, as the observer's body would act as a barrier.

When the coil is energized by excessively weak currents, the experimenter may, by touching one terminal of the coil with the tube, extinguish the latter, and may again light it by bringing it out of contact with the terminal and allowing a small arc to form. This is clearly due to the respective lowering and raising of the potential at that terminal. In the above experiment, when the tube is lighted through a small arc, it may go out when the arc is broken, because the electrostatic inductive effect alone is too weak, though the potential may be much higher; but when the arc is established, the electrification of the end of the tube is much greater, and it consequently lights.

When the coil is powered by very weak currents, the experimenter can extinguish the light in the tube by touching one terminal of the coil with it, and can relight it by pulling it away from the terminal and allowing a small arc to form. This happens because of the drop and rise in potential at that terminal. In this experiment, when the tube lights up through a small arc, it may go out when the arc breaks because the electrostatic inductive effect alone is too weak, even though the potential may be much higher. However, when the arc is formed, the electrification at the end of the tube is much stronger, which allows it to light up.

If a tube is lighted by holding it near to the coil, and in the hand which is remote, by grasping the tube anywhere with the other hand, the part between the hands is rendered dark, and the singular effect of wiping out the light of the tube may be produced by passing the hand quickly along the tube and at the same time withdrawing it gently from the coil, judging properly the distance so that the tube remains dark afterwards.

If you hold a tube near the coil to light it up, and then grasp the tube with your other hand, the section between your hands goes dark. You can create the unique effect of turning off the tube's light by quickly moving your hand along the tube while gently pulling it away from the coil, making sure to maintain the right distance so that the tube stays dark afterwards.

If the primary coil is placed sidewise, as in Fig. 112 B for instance, and an exhausted tube be introduced from the other side in the hollow space, the tube is lighted most intensely because of the increased condenser action, and in this position the striæ are most sharply defined. In all these experiments described, and in many others, the action is clearly electrostatic.

If the primary coil is positioned sideways, as shown in Fig. 112 B for example, and an evacuated tube is inserted from the other side into the hollow space, the tube lights up very brightly due to the enhanced condenser effect, and in this setup, the striations are sharply defined. In all these experiments mentioned, and in many others, the action is clearly electrostatic.

The effects of screening also indicate the electrostatic nature of the phenomena and show something of the nature of electrification through the air. For instance, if a tube is placed in the direction of the axis of the coil, and an insulated metal plate be interposed, the tube will generally increase in brilliancy, or if it be too far from the coil to light, it may even be rendered lumin[Pg 187]ous by interposing an insulated metal plate. The magnitude of the effects depends to some extent on the size of the plate. But if the metal plate be connected by a wire to the ground, its interposition will always make the tube go out even if it be very near the coil. In general, the interposition of a body between the coil and tube, increases or diminishes the brilliancy of the tube, or its facility to light up, according to whether it increases or diminishes the electrification. When experimenting with an insulated plate, the plate should not be taken too large, else it will generally produce a weakening effect by reason of its great facility for giving off energy to the surroundings.

The effects of screening also highlight the electrostatic nature of the phenomena and reveal aspects of electrification through the air. For example, if a tube is aligned with the axis of the coil and an insulated metal plate is placed in between, the tube will usually glow brighter. If it's too far from the coil to light up, the metal plate can still make it luminous by being interposed. The intensity of the effects partly depends on the size of the plate. However, if the metal plate is connected to the ground by a wire, placing it in between will always cause the tube to go dark, even if it's very close to the coil. Generally, putting an object between the coil and the tube either boosts or reduces the brightness of the tube or its ability to light up, depending on whether it increases or decreases the electrification. When experimenting with an insulated plate, it should not be too large, as it typically leads to a weakening effect due to its high tendency to release energy into the surroundings.

If a tube be lighted at some distance from the coil, and a plate of hard rubber or other insulating substance be interposed, the tube may be made to go out. The interposition of the dielectric in this case only slightly increases the inductive effect, but diminishes considerably the electrification through the air.

If a tube is lit at a distance from the coil, and a plate of hard rubber or another insulating material is placed in between, the tube can be turned off. Adding the dielectric in this case only slightly boosts the inductive effect, but significantly reduces the electric charge through the air.

In all cases, then, when we excite luminosity in exhausted tubes by means of such a coil, the effect is due to the rapidly alternating electrostatic potential; and, furthermore, it must be attributed to the harmonic alternation produced directly by the machine, and not to any superimposed vibration which might be thought to exist. Such superimposed vibrations are impossible when we work with an alternate current machine. If a spring be gradually tightened and released, it does not perform independent vibrations; for this a sudden release is necessary. So with the alternate currents from a dynamo machine; the medium is harmonically strained and released, this giving rise to only one kind of waves; a sudden contact or break, or a sudden giving way of the dielectric, as in the disruptive discharge of a Leyden jar, are essential for the production of superimposed waves.

In all cases, when we stimulate light in exhausted tubes using such a coil, the effect comes from the rapidly changing electrostatic potential. Moreover, it should be attributed to the harmonic changes produced directly by the machine, not to any added vibration that might be thought to exist. Such added vibrations are impossible when we use an alternating current machine. If a spring is gradually tightened and released, it doesn’t make independent vibrations; a sudden release is necessary for that. The same goes for the alternating currents from a dynamo machine; the medium is harmonically stretched and released, which results in only one type of wave. A sudden contact or break, or a sudden failure of the dielectric, like in the disruptive discharge of a Leyden jar, is essential for creating added waves.

In all the last described experiments, tubes devoid of any electrodes may be used, and there is no difficulty in producing by their means sufficient light to read by. The light effect is, however, considerably increased by the use of phosphorescent bodies such as yttria, uranium glass, etc. A difficulty will be found when the phosphorescent material is used, for with these powerful effects, it is carried gradually away, and it is preferable to use material in the form of a solid.

In all the experiments mentioned earlier, tubes without any electrodes can be used, and it's easy to generate enough light to read by. However, the light output is significantly enhanced by using phosphorescent materials like yttria, uranium glass, and so on. A challenge arises when using phosphorescent materials, as these strong effects tend to fade over time. Therefore, it’s better to use the material in solid form.

Instead of depending on induction at a distance to light the tube, the same may be provided with an external—and, if desired, also with an internal—condenser coating, and it may then[Pg 188] be suspended anywhere in the room from a conductor connected to one terminal of the coil, and in this manner a soft illumination may be provided.

Instead of relying on remote induction to light the tube, it can be equipped with an external—and, if desired, also an internal—condenser coating. It can then[Pg 188] be hung anywhere in the room from a conductor linked to one terminal of the coil, allowing for a gentle illumination.

Fig. 125. Fig. 125.

The ideal way of lighting a hall or room would, however, be to produce such a condition in it that an illuminating device could be moved and put anywhere, and that it is lighted, no matter where it is put and without being electrically connected to[Pg 189] anything. I have been able to produce such a condition by creating in the room a powerful, rapidly alternating electrostatic field. For this purpose I suspend a sheet of metal a distance from the ceiling on insulating cords and connect it to one terminal of the induction coil, the other terminal being preferably connected to the ground. Or else I suspend two sheets as illustrated in Fig. 125, each sheet being connected with one of the terminals of the coil, and their size being carefully determined. An exhausted tube may then be carried in the hand anywhere between the sheets or placed anywhere, even a certain distance beyond them; it remains always luminous.

The best way to light up a hall or room is to create a situation where a light source can be moved and placed anywhere, and it will be lit no matter where it is located, without needing an electrical connection to[Pg 189]anything. I've managed to achieve this by setting up a strong, rapidly alternating electrostatic field in the room. To do this, I hang a metal sheet from the ceiling on insulating cords and connect it to one terminal of the induction coil, with the other terminal preferably connected to the ground. Alternatively, I can hang two sheets as shown in Fig. 125, connecting each sheet to one of the terminals of the coil, with their sizes carefully determined. An exhausted tube can then be held anywhere between the sheets or placed anywhere, even a bit beyond them; it will always remain lit.

In such an electrostatic field interesting phenomena may be observed, especially if the alternations are kept low and the potentials excessively high. In addition to the luminous phenomena mentioned, one may observe that any insulated conductor gives sparks when the hand or another object is approached to it, and the sparks may often be powerful. When a large conducting object is fastened on an insulating support, and the hand approached to it, a vibration, due to the rythmical motion of the air molecules is felt, and luminous streams may be perceived when the hand is held near a pointed projection. When a telephone receiver is made to touch with one or both of its terminals an insulated conductor of some size, the telephone emits a loud sound; it also emits a sound when a length of wire is attached to one or both terminals, and with very powerful fields a sound may be perceived even without any wire.

In an electrostatic field, you can observe some interesting phenomena, especially when the frequency is kept low and the voltage is extremely high. Besides the glowing effects already mentioned, you will notice that any insulated conductor sparks when your hand or another object gets close to it, and these sparks can often be quite strong. If a large conductive object is mounted on an insulating base and you bring your hand near it, you can feel a vibration caused by the rhythmic motion of air molecules, and bright streams of light may appear when your hand is close to a pointed tip. When a telephone receiver touches one or both of its terminals to a sizable insulated conductor, it produces a loud sound; it also makes noise when a wire is connected to one or both terminals, and in very strong fields, you might hear a sound even without any wire.

How far this principle is capable of practical application, the future will tell. It might be thought that electrostatic effects are unsuited for such action at a distance. Electromagnetic inductive effects, if available for the production of light, might be thought better suited. It is true the electrostatic effects diminish nearly with the cube of the distance from the coil, whereas the electromagnetic inductive effects diminish simply with the distance. But when we establish an electrostatic field of force, the condition is very different, for then, instead of the differential effect of both the terminals, we get their conjoint effect. Besides, I would call attention to the effect, that in an alternating electrostatic field, a conductor, such as an exhausted tube, for instance, tends to take up most of the energy, whereas in an electromagnetic alternating field the conductor tends to take up the least energy, the waves being reflected with but little loss.[Pg 190] This is one reason why it is difficult to excite an exhausted tube, at a distance, by electromagnetic induction. I have wound coils of very large diameter and of many turns of wire, and connected a Geissler tube to the ends of the coil with the object of exciting the tube at a distance; but even with the powerful inductive effects producible by Leyden jar discharges, the tube could not be excited unless at a very small distance, although some judgment was used as to the dimensions of the coil. I have also found that even the most powerful Leyden jar discharges are capable of exciting only feeble luminous effects in a closed exhausted tube, and even these effects upon thorough examination I have been forced to consider of an electrostatic nature.

How practical this principle will be in real-world applications remains to be seen. It might seem that electrostatic effects aren’t fit for action at a distance. Electromagnetic induction effects, if they can produce light, might be considered more suitable. It’s true that electrostatic effects decrease nearly with the cube of the distance from the coil, while electromagnetic induction effects only decrease with the distance. However, when we create an electrostatic field, the situation changes significantly; instead of just the differential effect of both terminals, we experience their combined effect. Additionally, I want to highlight that in an alternating electrostatic field, a conductor, like an exhausted tube, tends to absorb most of the energy, whereas in an electromagnetic alternating field, the conductor tends to absorb the least energy, as the waves reflect with minimal loss.[Pg 190] This is one reason it’s challenging to excite an exhausted tube from a distance using electromagnetic induction. I’ve created coils with very large diameters and many turns of wire, connecting a Geissler tube to the ends of the coil to try and excite the tube at a distance. Yet, even with the powerful inductive effects produced by Leyden jar discharges, the tube could only be excited at a very close distance, although I made some considerations regarding the coil's dimensions. I’ve also discovered that even the most powerful Leyden jar discharges can only produce weak luminous effects in a closed exhausted tube, and upon careful examination, I’ve had to conclude that these effects are of an electrostatic nature.

How then can we hope to produce the required effects at a distance by means of electromagnetic action, when even in the closest proximity to the source of disturbance, under the most advantageous conditions, we can excite but faint luminosity? It is true that when acting at a distance we have the resonance to help us out. We can connect an exhausted tube, or whatever the illuminating device may be, with an insulated system of the proper capacity, and so it may be possible to increase the effect qualitatively, and only qualitatively, for we would not get more energy through the device. So we may, by resonance effect, obtain the required electromotive force in an exhausted tube, and excite faint luminous effects, but we cannot get enough energy to render the light practically available, and a simple calculation, based on experimental results, shows that even if all the energy which a tube would receive at a certain distance from the source should be wholly converted into light, it would hardly satisfy the practical requirements. Hence the necessity of directing, by means of a conducting circuit, the energy to the place of transformation. But in so doing we cannot very sensibly depart from present methods, and all we could do would be to improve the apparatus.

How can we expect to create the necessary effects from a distance using electromagnetic action when, even when we're very close to the source of disturbance, under the best conditions, we can only produce faint light? It's true that when we work at a distance, we have resonance to assist us. We can connect a vacuum tube, or whatever the light source may be, to an insulated system with the right capacity, which might allow us to enhance the effect qualitatively, but only qualitatively, because we wouldn't be getting more energy through the device. So, through resonance, we may achieve the required electromotive force in a vacuum tube and provoke faint light effects, but we can’t generate enough energy for the light to be useful. A simple calculation based on experimental results shows that even if all the energy a tube receives at a certain distance from the source were completely transformed into light, it would barely meet practical needs. Thus, it's necessary to direct energy to the transformation point using a conducting circuit. However, in doing this, we can't significantly change current methods, and all we could do is enhance the equipment.

From these considerations it would seem that if this ideal way of lighting is to be rendered practicable it will be only by the use of electrostatic effects. In such a case the most powerful electrostatic inductive effects are needed; the apparatus employed must, therefore, be capable of producing high electrostatic potentials changing in value with extreme rapidity. High frequencies are especially wanted, for practical considerations make it desirable to keep down the potential. By the employment of machines,[Pg 191] or, generally speaking, of any mechanical apparatus, but low frequencies can be reached; recourse must, therefore, be had to some other means. The discharge of a condenser affords us a means of obtaining frequencies by far higher than are obtainable mechanically, and I have accordingly employed condensers in the experiments to the above end.

Based on these considerations, it seems that if this ideal method of lighting is to be made practical, it will only be possible by using electrostatic effects. In this case, the strongest electrostatic inductive effects are necessary; therefore, the equipment used must be capable of generating high electrostatic potentials that change in value very quickly. High frequencies are particularly important because practical reasons make it desirable to keep the potential low. By using machines, [Pg 191] or, generally, any mechanical equipment, we can only reach low frequencies; therefore, we need to find another solution. The discharge of a condenser provides a way to achieve frequencies that are much higher than those obtainable mechanically, and I have accordingly used condensers in the experiments for this purpose.

When the terminals of a high tension induction coil, Fig. 126, are connected to a Leyden jar, and the latter is discharging disruptively into a circuit, we may look upon the arc playing between the knobs as being a source of alternating, or generally speaking, undulating currents, and then we have to deal with the familiar system of a generator of such currents, a circuit connected to it, and a condenser bridging the circuit. The condenser in such case is a veritable transformer, and since the frequency is excessive, almost any ratio in the strength of the currents in both the branches may be obtained. In reality the analogy is not quite complete, for in the disruptive discharge we have most generally a fundamental instantaneous variation of comparatively low frequency, and a superimposed harmonic vibration, and the laws governing the flow of currents are not the same for both.

When the terminals of a high-tension induction coil, Fig. 126, are connected to a Leyden jar, and the jar is discharging disruptively into a circuit, we can see the arc between the knobs as a source of alternating, or generally speaking, undulating currents. Then we have to work with the familiar setup of a generator for these currents, a circuit connected to it, and a capacitor bridging the circuit. In this case, the capacitor acts as a true transformer, and since the frequency is extremely high, we can achieve almost any ratio in the strength of the currents in both branches. However, the analogy isn't entirely accurate because, in disruptive discharges, we usually have a fundamental instantaneous variation of relatively low frequency, along with a superimposed harmonic vibration, and the laws governing the flow of currents differ for both.

In converting in this manner, the ratio of conversion should not be too great, for the loss in the arc between the knobs increases with the square of the current, and if the jar be discharged through very thick and short conductors, with the view of obtaining a very rapid oscillation, a very considerable portion of the energy stored is lost. On the other hand, too small ratios are not practicable for many obvious reasons.

In converting this way, the conversion ratio shouldn't be too high, because the loss in the arc between the knobs increases with the square of the current. If the jar is discharged through very thick and short conductors to achieve a rapid oscillation, a significant amount of the stored energy is wasted. On the flip side, too small ratios aren't feasible for many clear reasons.

As the converted currents flow in a practically closed circuit, the electrostatic effects are necessarily small, and I therefore convert them into currents or effects of the required character. I have effected such conversions in several ways. The preferred plan of connections is illustrated in Fig. 127. The manner of operating renders it easy to obtain by means of a small and inexpensive apparatus enormous differences of potential which have been usually obtained by means of large and expensive coils. For this it is only necessary to take an ordinary small coil, adjust to it a condenser and discharging circuit, forming the primary of an auxiliary small coil, and convert upward. As the inductive effect of the primary currents is excessively great, the second coil need have comparatively but very few turns. By properly adjusting the elements, remarkable results may be secured.[Pg 192]

As the converted currents move in a nearly closed circuit, the electrostatic effects are minimal, so I change them into currents or effects of the desired type. I've made these changes in several ways. The preferred connection setup is shown in Fig. 127. This method makes it easy to achieve huge differences in potential using a small, affordable device, which has typically been accomplished with large, costly coils. To do this, you just need to take a regular small coil, connect a capacitor and a discharge circuit to it, creating the primary for a secondary small coil, and then convert it upward. Since the inductive effect of the primary currents is extremely strong, the second coil can have relatively few turns. By properly adjusting the components, impressive results can be achieved.[Pg 192]

In endeavoring to obtain the required electrostatic effects in this manner, I have, as might be expected, encountered many difficulties which I have been gradually overcoming, but I am not as yet prepared to dwell upon my experiences in this direction.

In trying to achieve the needed electrostatic effects this way, I have, as expected, run into many challenges that I have been gradually overcoming, but I’m not quite ready to share my experiences in this area yet.

I believe that the disruptive discharge of a condenser will play an important part in the future, for it offers vast possibilities, not only in the way of producing light in a more efficient manner and in the line indicated by theory, but also in many other respects.

I think that the abrupt release of a condenser will play a significant role in the future because it provides immense possibilities, not just in creating light more efficiently and as theory suggests, but also in various other ways.

Fig. 126. Fig. 126.

For years the efforts of inventors have been directed towards obtaining electrical energy from heat by means of the thermopile. It might seem invidious to remark that but few know what is the real trouble with the thermopile. It is not the inefficiency or small output—though these are great drawbacks—but the fact that the thermopile has its phylloxera, that is, that by constant use it is deteriorated, which has thus far prevented its introduction on an industrial scale. Now that all modern research seems to point with certainty to the use of electricity of excessively high tension, the question must present itself to many whether it is not possible to obtain in a practicable manner this form of energy from heat. We have been used to look upon an electrostatic machine as a plaything, and somehow we couple with it the idea of the inefficient and impractical. But now we must think differently, for now we know that everywhere we have to deal with the same forces, and that it is a mere question of inventing proper methods or apparatus for rendering them available.

For years, inventors have been focused on generating electrical energy from heat using the thermopile. It might seem unfair to point out that very few people understand the real issue with the thermopile. It's not just the inefficiency or low output—although those are significant drawbacks—but rather that the thermopile has its own problems, meaning that with constant use it deteriorates, which has prevented its widespread industrial use. Now that modern research increasingly suggests the use of extremely high voltage electricity, many may wonder if it's possible to practically generate this type of energy from heat. We've tended to see an electrostatic machine as just a toy and associate it with being inefficient and impractical. But now we need to change our perspective because we know we're dealing with the same forces everywhere, and it's simply a matter of inventing the right methods or equipment to make them usable.

In the present systems of electrical distribution, the employment of the iron with its wonderful magnetic properties allows us to reduce considerably the size of the apparatus; but, in spite of this, it is still very cumbersome. The more we progress in the study of electric and magnetic phenomena, the more we be[Pg 193]come convinced that the present methods will be short-lived. For the production of light, at least, such heavy machinery would seem to be unnecessary. The energy required is very small, and if light can be obtained as efficiently as, theoretically, it appears possible, the apparatus need have but a very small output. There being a strong probability that the illuminating methods of the future will involve the use of very high potentials, it seems very desirable to perfect a contrivance capable of converting the energy of heat into energy of the requisite form. Nothing to speak of has been done towards this end, for the thought that electricity of some 50,000 or 100,000 volts pressure or more, even if obtained, would be unavailable for practical purposes, has deterred inventors from working in this direction.

In today's electrical distribution systems, using iron with its impressive magnetic properties allows us to significantly reduce the size of the equipment; however, it still remains quite bulky. As we continue to explore electric and magnetic phenomena, we become more convinced that the current methods won't last much longer. For producing light, at least, such heavy machinery seems unnecessary. The energy needed is minimal, and if we can generate light as efficiently as it theoretically appears possible, the equipment requires only a very small output. Given the strong likelihood that future lighting methods will involve using very high voltages, it seems essential to develop a device that can convert heat energy into the required form of energy. Unfortunately, not much has been done in this area because the belief that electricity at pressures of 50,000 or 100,000 volts or more, even if attainable, wouldn’t be practical has discouraged inventors from pursuing this path.

Fig. 127. Fig. 127.

In Fig. 126 a plan of connections is shown for converting currents of high, into currents of low, tension by means of the disruptive discharge of a condenser. This plan has been used by me frequently for operating a few incandescent lamps required in the laboratory. Some difficulties have been encountered in the arc of the discharge which I have been able to overcome to a great extent; besides this, and the adjustment necessary for the proper working, no other difficulties have been met with, and it was easy to operate ordinary lamps, and even motors, in this manner. The line being connected to the ground, all the wires could be handled with perfect impunity, no matter how high the potential at the terminals of the condenser. In these experiments a high tension induction coil, operated from a battery or from an alternate current machine, was employed to charge the condenser; but the induction coil might be replaced by an apparatus of a different kind, capable of giving electricity of such high tension. In this manner, direct or alternating currents may be converted, and in both cases the current-impulses may be of any desired frequency. When the currents charging the condenser are of the[Pg 194] same direction, and it is desired that the converted currents should also be of one direction, the resistance of the discharging circuit should, of course, be so chosen that there are no oscillations.

In Fig. 126, a connection plan is shown for converting high-voltage currents into low-voltage currents using the disruptive discharge of a capacitor. I have often used this plan to power a few incandescent lamps needed in the lab. I've faced some challenges with the arc of the discharge, but I've managed to overcome most of them. Besides that, and the necessary adjustments for proper operation, I haven’t encountered any other issues, and it was straightforward to use this method for standard lamps and even motors. With the line connected to the ground, all the wires could be handled safely, regardless of how high the voltage at the capacitor's terminals. In these experiments, a high-voltage induction coil, powered by a battery or an alternating current machine, was used to charge the capacitor; however, the induction coil could be replaced with different equipment capable of delivering such high voltage electricity. This way, direct or alternating currents can be converted, and in both situations, the charging current impulses can have any desired frequency. When the currents charging the capacitor are in the same direction and it's intended for the converted currents to also be unidirectional, the resistance of the discharging circuit should be selected to prevent any oscillations.

Fig. 128. Fig. 128.

In operating devices on the above plan I have observed curious phenomena of impedance which are of interest. For instance if a thick copper bar be bent, as indicated in Fig. 128, and shunted by ordinary incandescent lamps, then, by passing the discharge between the knobs, the lamps may be brought to incandescence although they are short-circuited. When a large induction coil is employed it is easy to obtain nodes on the bar, which are rendered evident by the different degree of brilliancy of the lamps, as shown roughly in Fig. 128. The nodes are never clearly defined, but they are simply maxima and minima of potentials along the bar. This is probably due to the irregularity of the arc between the knobs. In general when the above-described plan of conversion from high to low tension is used, the behavior of the disruptive discharge may be closely studied. The nodes may also be investigated by means of an ordinary Cardew voltmeter[Pg 195] which should be well insulated. Geissler tubes may also be lighted across the points of the bent bar; in this case, of course, it is better to employ smaller capacities. I have found it practicable to light up in this manner a lamp, and even a Geissler tube, shunted by a short, heavy block of metal, and this result seems at first very curious. In fact, the thicker the copper bar in Fig. 128, the better it is for the success of the experiments, as they appear more striking. When lamps with long slender filaments are used it will be often noted that the filaments are from time to time violently vibrated, the vibration being smallest at the nodal points. This vibration seems to be due to an electrostatic action between the filament and the glass of the bulb.

In using devices based on the plan above, I've noticed some interesting phenomena related to impedance. For example, if you bend a thick copper bar as shown in Fig. 128 and connect it with regular incandescent lamps, you can get the lamps to light up even when they are short-circuited by passing a discharge between the knobs. When using a large induction coil, it’s easy to see nodes on the bar, which are indicated by the varying brightness of the lamps, roughly illustrated in Fig. 128. The nodes aren’t clearly defined; they are just places of maximum and minimum potential along the bar. This is likely because of the irregular arc between the knobs. Generally, when using the described method to convert from high to low voltage, you can closely observe how the disruptive discharge behaves. You can also examine the nodes with a standard Cardew voltmeter[Pg 195], which should be well insulated. Geissler tubes can also be lit across the points of the bent bar; in this case, it’s better to use smaller capacities. I’ve found that it’s possible to light a lamp and even a Geissler tube in this way, using a short, heavy block of metal as a shunt, which is quite fascinating at first. In fact, the thicker the copper bar in Fig. 128, the more successful the experiments tend to be, as they look more impressive. When using lamps with long, thin filaments, you’ll often notice that the filaments vibrate strongly, with the least vibration occurring at the nodal points. This vibration seems to result from an electrostatic interaction between the filament and the glass of the bulb.

Fig. 129. Fig. 129.

In some of the above experiments it is preferable to use special lamps having a straight filament as shown in Fig. 129. When such a lamp is used a still more curious phenomenon than those described may be observed. The lamp may be placed across the copper bar and lighted, and by using somewhat larger capacities, or, in other words, smaller frequencies or smaller impulsive impedances, the filament may be brought to any desired degree of incandescence. But when the impedance is increased, a point is reached when comparatively little current passes through the carbon, and most of it through the rarefied gas; or perhaps it may be more correct to state that the current divides nearly evenly through both, in spite of the enormous difference in the resistance, and this would be true unless the gas and the filament behave differently. It is then noted that the whole bulb is brilliantly illuminated, and the ends of the leading-in wires become incandescent and often throw off sparks in consequence of the violent bombardment, but the carbon filament remains dark. This is illustrated in Fig. 129. Instead of the filament a single[Pg 196] wire extending through the whole bulb may be used, and in this case the phenomenon would seem to be still more interesting.

In some of the experiments mentioned earlier, it's better to use special lamps with a straight filament, as shown in Fig. 129. When this type of lamp is used, even more fascinating phenomena can be observed than those previously described. The lamp can be positioned across the copper bar and turned on, and by using somewhat larger capacities, or, in other words, lower frequencies or lower impulsive impedances, the filament can be adjusted to any desired level of brightness. However, when the impedance is increased, there comes a point where only a small amount of current flows through the carbon, while most of it flows through the rarefied gas; or it might be more accurate to say that the current divides almost evenly between the two, despite the huge difference in resistance, unless the gas and filament act differently. At this point, it's observed that the entire bulb glows brightly, and the ends of the connecting wires become incandescent and often emit sparks due to the intense bombardment, while the carbon filament remains dim. This is illustrated in Fig. 129. Instead of a filament, you could use a single wire running through the entire bulb, which makes the phenomenon seem even more interesting.

From the above experiment it will be evident, that when ordinary lamps are operated by the converted currents, those should be preferably taken in which the platinum wires are far apart, and the frequencies used should not be too great, else the discharge will occur at the ends of the filament or in the base of the lamp between the leading-in wires, and the lamp might then be damaged.

From the experiment above, it will be clear that when regular lamps are powered by the converted currents, it's better to choose those with platinum wires spaced further apart, and the frequencies used shouldn't be too high. Otherwise, the discharge may happen at the ends of the filament or in the base of the lamp between the connecting wires, which could damage the lamp.

In presenting to you these results of my investigation on the subject under consideration, I have paid only a passing notice to facts upon which I could have dwelt at length, and among many observations I have selected only those which I thought most likely to interest you. The field is wide and completely unexplored, and at every step a new truth is gleaned, a novel fact observed.

In sharing the results of my research on this topic, I have only briefly mentioned facts I could have elaborated on, and among many observations, I've chosen only those I believe will interest you the most. The area is vast and entirely unexplored, and with each step, a new truth is discovered and an interesting fact is noted.

How far the results here borne out are capable of practical applications will be decided in the future. As regards the production of light, some results already reached are encouraging and make me confident in asserting that the practical solution of the problem lies in the direction I have endeavored to indicate. Still, whatever may be the immediate outcome of these experiments I am hopeful that they will only prove a step in further development towards the ideal and final perfection. The possibilities which are opened by modern research are so vast that even the most reserved must feel sanguine of the future. Eminent scientists consider the problem of utilizing one kind of radiation without the others a rational one. In an apparatus designed for the production of light by conversion from any form of energy into that of light, such a result can never be reached, for no matter what the process of producing the required vibrations, be it electrical, chemical or any other, it will not be possible to obtain the higher light vibrations without going through the lower heat vibrations. It is the problem of imparting to a body a certain velocity without passing through all lower velocities. But there is a possibility of obtaining energy not only in the form of light, but motive power, and energy of any other form, in some more direct way from the medium. The time will be when this will be accomplished, and the time has come when one may utter such words before an enlightened audience without being considered a visionary. We are whirling through[Pg 197] endless space with an inconceivable speed, all around us everything is spinning, everything is moving, everywhere is energy. There must be some way of availing ourselves of this energy more directly. Then, with the light obtained from the medium, with the power derived from it, with every form of energy obtained without effort, from the store forever inexhaustible, humanity will advance with giant strides. The mere contemplation of these magnificent possibilities expands our minds, strengthens our hopes and fills our hearts with supreme delight.

How much these results can be practically applied will be determined in the future. Regarding light production, some encouraging results have already been achieved, leading me to believe that the practical solution lies in the direction I’ve suggested. Regardless of the immediate outcomes of these experiments, I am hopeful that they will only represent a step towards further development and ultimate perfection. The possibilities opened by modern research are so extensive that even the most cautious must feel optimistic about the future. Leading scientists view the aim of using one type of radiation without others as a logical one. In a device created to produce light by converting any form of energy into light, that goal can never be fully achieved, since regardless of how the necessary vibrations are produced—whether electrical, chemical, or otherwise—it won't be possible to generate higher light vibrations without first going through the lower heat vibrations. It's similar to the challenge of giving an object a certain speed without passing through all the lower speeds. However, there is a chance of obtaining energy not just as light, but also as motion and in other forms, in a more direct way from the medium. The time will come when this is achieved, and we can now discuss such ideas in front of an informed audience without being seen as dreamers. We are zooming through endless space at an unimaginable speed, everything around us is spinning, everything is in motion, and everywhere there is energy. There must be a way to tap into this energy more directly. Then, with the light we derive from the medium, with the power gained from it, and with every form of energy effortlessly generated from a source that is forever inexhaustible, humanity will make tremendous progress. Just thinking about these incredible possibilities expands our minds, bolsters our hopes, and fills our hearts with immense joy.


CHAPTER XXVII.

Experiments with High Potential and High Frequency Alternate Currents.[2]

I cannot find words to express how deeply I feel the honor of addressing some of the foremost thinkers of the present time, and so many able scientific men, engineers and electricians, of the country greatest in scientific achievements.

I can't find the words to express how deeply honored I am to speak to some of the leading thinkers of our time, as well as so many skilled scientists, engineers, and electricians from the country that excels in scientific achievements.

The results which I have the honor to present before such a gathering I cannot call my own. There are among you not a few who can lay better claim than myself on any feature of merit which this work may contain. I need not mention many names which are world-known—names of those among you who are recognized as the leaders in this enchanting science; but one, at least, I must mention—a name which could not be omitted in a demonstration of this kind. It is a name associated with the most beautiful invention ever made: it is Crookes!

I can’t claim the results I’m about to share as my own in front of this gathering. Many of you have a stronger right to take credit for any merits this work may have. I won’t list all the well-known names here—those of you recognized as leaders in this fascinating field—but I must mention one name that absolutely cannot be left out of this presentation. It’s the name linked to the most remarkable invention ever created: Crookes!

When I was at college, a good while ago, I read, in a translation (for then I was not familiar with your magnificent language), the description of his experiments on radiant matter. I read it only once in my life—that time—yet every detail about that charming work I can remember to this day. Few are the books, let me say, which can make such an impression upon the mind of a student.

When I was in college a long time ago, I read a translation (because back then I wasn't familiar with your amazing language) of his experiments on radiant matter. I only read it once, but I still remember every detail of that captivating work. There are only a few books that can leave such a lasting impression on a student's mind.

But if, on the present occasion, I mention this name as one of many your Institution can boast of, it is because I have more than one reason to do so. For what I have to tell you and to show you this evening concerns, in a large measure, that same vague world which Professor Crookes has so ably explored; and, more than this, when I trace back the mental process which led me to these advances—which even by myself cannot be considered trifling, since they are so appreciated by you—I believe that their real origin, that which started me to work in this [Pg 199]direction, and brought me to them, after a long period of constant thought, was that fascinating little book which I read many years ago.

But if I mention this name today as one of the many your Institution is proud of, it’s because I have more than one reason to do so. What I have to share with you this evening relates significantly to the same uncertain realm that Professor Crookes has skillfully explored. Furthermore, when I reflect on the thought process that led me to these developments—which, even in my own view, cannot be dismissed as insignificant since they are valued by you—I believe that the true source, the spark that motivated me to pursue this path and ultimately brought me to these insights after a long period of deep contemplation, was that intriguing little book I read many years ago.

And now that I have made a feeble effort to express my homage and acknowledge my indebtedness to him and others among you, I will make a second effort, which I hope you will not find so feeble as the first, to entertain you.

And now that I've made a weak attempt to show my respect and acknowledge my gratitude to him and others among you, I'll make another attempt, which I hope you won’t find as weak as the first, to entertain you.

Give me leave to introduce the subject in a few words.

Let me take a moment to introduce the topic briefly.

A short time ago I had the honor to bring before our American Institute of Electrical Engineers some results then arrived at by me in a novel line of work. I need not assure you that the many evidences which I have received that English scientific men and engineers were interested in this work have been for me a great reward and encouragement. I will not dwell upon the experiments already described, except with the view of completing, or more clearly expressing, some ideas advanced by me before, and also with the view of rendering the study here presented self-contained, and my remarks on the subject of this evening's lecture consistent.

A little while ago, I had the privilege of presenting some findings to our American Institute of Electrical Engineers that I had recently discovered in a new area of research. I don’t need to tell you how rewarding and encouraging it has been to receive numerous indications that English scientists and engineers are interested in this work. I won’t go into detail about the experiments I’ve already described, except to clarify some ideas I’ve shared before and to make sure that the study I’m presenting tonight stands on its own, and that my comments are consistent with the topic of this evening's lecture.

This investigation, then, it goes without saying, deals with alternating currents, and to be more precise, with alternating currents of high potential and high frequency. Just in how much a very high frequency is essential for the production of the results presented is a question which, even with my present experience, would embarrass me to answer. Some of the experiments may be performed with low frequencies; but very high frequencies are desirable, not only on account of the many effects secured by their use, but also as a convenient means of obtaining, in the induction apparatus employed, the high potentials, which in their turn are necessary to the demonstration of most of the experiments here contemplated.

This investigation, as you might expect, focuses on alternating currents, specifically those of high potential and high frequency. Just how crucial a very high frequency is for achieving the results presented is a question that would still challenge me to answer with my current experience. Some experiments can be conducted at low frequencies, but very high frequencies are preferred, not only because of the various effects they produce but also because they conveniently generate the high potentials needed in the induction equipment used, which are necessary to demonstrate most of the experiments discussed here.

Of the various branches of electrical investigation, perhaps the most interesting and the most immediately promising is that dealing with alternating currents. The progress in this branch of applied science has been so great in recent years that it justifies the most sanguine hopes. Hardly have we become familiar with one fact, when novel experiences are met and new avenues of research are opened. Even at this hour possibilities not dreamed of before are, by the use of these currents, partly realized. As in nature all is ebb and tide, all is wave motion, so it seems that in all branches of industry alternating currents—electric wave motion—will have the sway.[Pg 200]

Of the different areas of electrical research, one of the most exciting and promising is the study of alternating currents. Recent advancements in this field of applied science have been so significant that they inspire great optimism. Just when we think we’ve grasped one concept, we encounter new experiences and fresh research opportunities. Even now, possibilities that were once unimaginable are becoming a reality with the use of these currents. Just as nature is characterized by ebb and flow, by wave motion, it appears that alternating currents—electric wave motion—will dominate all sectors of industry.[Pg 200]

One reason, perhaps, why this branch of science is being so rapidly developed is to be found in the interest which is attached to its experimental study. We wind a simple ring of iron with coils; we establish the connections to the generator, and with wonder and delight we note the effects of strange forces which we bring into play, which allow us to transform, to transmit and direct energy at will. We arrange the circuits properly, and we see the mass of iron and wires behave as though it were endowed with life, spinning a heavy armature, through invisible connections, with great speed and power—with the energy possibly conveyed from a great distance. We observe how the energy of an alternating current traversing the wire manifests itself—not so much in the wire as in the surrounding space—in the most surprising manner, taking the forms of heat, light, mechanical energy, and, most surprising of all, even chemical affinity. All these observations fascinate us, and fill us with an intense desire to know more about the nature of these phenomena. Each day we go to our work in the hope of discovering,—in the hope that some one, no matter who, may find a solution of one of the pending great problems,—and each succeeding day we return to our task with renewed ardor; and even if we are unsuccessful, our work has not been in vain, for in these strivings, in these efforts, we have found hours of untold pleasure, and we have directed our energies to the benefit of mankind.

One reason, perhaps, why this branch of science is growing so quickly is the interest that comes from its experimental study. We wrap a simple ring of iron with coils, connect it to the generator, and with wonder and excitement, we notice the effects of strange forces that we activate, allowing us to transform, transmit, and control energy at will. We set up the circuits correctly, and we watch as the mass of iron and wires behaves as if it were alive, rapidly spinning a heavy armature through invisible connections with great speed and power—possibly with energy coming from far away. We see how the energy from an alternating current moving through the wire shows itself—not so much in the wire as in the surrounding space—in the most surprising ways, manifesting as heat, light, mechanical energy, and, surprisingly, even chemical affinity. All of these observations captivate us and fill us with a strong desire to learn more about the nature of these phenomena. Each day we go to our work hoping to discover something—hoping that someone, anyone, might find a solution to one of the big problems—and every day we return to our task with renewed enthusiasm; and even if we don’t succeed, our work has not been wasted, because in these efforts, we have found countless hours of joy, and we have channeled our energies for the benefit of humanity.

We may take—at random, if you choose—any of the many experiments which may be performed with alternating currents; a few of which only, and by no means the most striking, form the subject of this evening's demonstration; they are all equally interesting, equally inciting to thought.

We can randomly choose any of the many experiments that can be done with alternating currents; only a few of these, and not necessarily the most impressive, will be covered in tonight’s demonstration; they are all equally fascinating and thought-provoking.

Here is a simple glass tube from which the air has been partially exhausted. I take hold of it; I bring my body in contact with a wire conveying alternating currents of high potential, and the tube in my hand is brilliantly lighted. In whatever position I may put it, wherever I move it in space, as far as I can reach, its soft, pleasing light persists with undiminished brightness.

Here is a simple glass tube with some of the air removed. I grab it; I bring my body close to a wire carrying high-voltage alternating currents, and the tube in my hand lights up brilliantly. No matter how I position it or where I move it in space, as far as I can reach, its soft, pleasing light remains just as bright.

Here is an exhausted bulb suspended from a single wire. Standing on an insulated support, I grasp it, and a platinum button mounted in it is brought to vivid incandescence.

Here is a tired bulb hanging from a single wire. Standing on an insulated base, I hold it, and a platinum button embedded in it glows brightly.

Here, attached to a leading wire, is another bulb, which, as I touch its metallic socket, is filled with magnificent colors of phosphorescent light.[Pg 201]

Here, connected to a wire, is another bulb, which, when I touch its metallic socket, is filled with stunning colors of phosphorescent light.[Pg 201]

Here still another, which by my fingers' touch casts a shadow—the Crookes shadow—of the stem inside of it.

Here is another one that, through the touch of my fingers, casts a shadow—the Crookes shadow—of the stem inside it.

Here, again, insulated as I stand on this platform, I bring my body in contact with one of the terminals of the secondary of this induction coil—with the end of a wire many miles long—and you see streams of light break forth from its distant end, which is set in violent vibration.

Here, once more, isolated as I am on this platform, I connect my body to one of the terminals of the secondary of this induction coil—with the end of a wire that stretches for miles—and you can see streams of light burst forth from its far end, which is vibrating intensely.

Here, once more, I attach these two plates of wire gauze to the terminals of the coil; I set them a distance apart, and I set the coil to work. You may see a small spark pass between the plates. I insert a thick plate of one of the best dielectrics between them, and instead of rendering altogether impossible, as we are used to expect, I aid the passage of the discharge, which, as I insert the plate, merely changes in appearance and assumes the form of luminous streams.

Here, once again, I connect these two wire mesh plates to the terminals of the coil; I space them apart and activate the coil. You can see a small spark jump between the plates. I then place a thick sheet of one of the best insulators between them, and instead of completely stopping the discharge, as we usually expect, I actually help the discharge to pass through, which, as I insert the sheet, simply changes in appearance and takes on the form of glowing streams.

Is there, I ask, can there be, a more interesting study than that of alternating currents?

Is there, I ask, can there be, a more interesting study than that of alternating currents?

In all these investigations, in all these experiments, which are so very, very interesting, for many years past—ever since the greatest experimenter who lectured in this hall discovered its principle—we have had a steady companion, an appliance familiar to every one, a plaything once, a thing of momentous importance now—the induction coil. There is no dearer appliance to the electrician. From the ablest among you, I dare say, down to the inexperienced student, to your lecturer, we all have passed many delightful hours in experimenting with the induction coil. We have watched its play, and thought and pondered over the beautiful phenomena which it disclosed to our ravished eyes. So well known is this apparatus, so familiar are these phenomena to every one, that my courage nearly fails me when I think that I have ventured to address so able an audience, that I have ventured to entertain you with that same old subject. Here in reality is the same apparatus, and here are the same phenomena, only the apparatus is operated somewhat differently, the phenomena are presented in a different aspect. Some of the results we find as expected, others surprise us, but all captivate our attention, for in scientific investigation each novel result achieved may be the centre of a new departure, each novel fact learned may lead to important developments.

In all these investigations and experiments, which are really fascinating, for many years now—ever since the greatest experimenter who spoke in this hall discovered its principle—we have had a constant companion, a device familiar to everyone, a toy once, a thing of great importance now—the induction coil. There is no more beloved device for the electrician. From the most skilled among you, I’m sure, down to the inexperienced student, to your lecturer, we have all spent many enjoyable hours experimenting with the induction coil. We have watched its effects and thought deeply about the beautiful phenomena it reveals to our amazed eyes. This apparatus is so well-known, and these phenomena are so familiar to everyone, that I almost lose my confidence thinking about addressing such a knowledgeable audience, and that I have dared to entertain you with this same old topic. Here, in truth, is the same apparatus, and here are the same phenomena, only the apparatus is operated a bit differently, and the phenomena are presented in a different way. Some of the results we expect, while others surprise us, but all grab our attention, because in scientific investigation, each new result may lead to a new direction, and each new fact learned may lead to significant advancements.

Usually in operating an induction coil we have set up a vibration of moderate frequency in the primary, either by means of an[Pg 202] interrupter or break, or by the use of an alternator. Earlier English investigators, to mention only Spottiswoode and J. E. H. Gordon, have used a rapid break in connection with the coil. Our knowledge and experience of to-day enables us to see clearly why these coils under the conditions of the test did not disclose any remarkable phenomena, and why able experimenters failed to perceive many of the curious effects which have since been observed.

Typically, when using an induction coil, we set up a moderate frequency vibration in the primary, either through an[Pg 202] interrupter or break, or by using an alternator. Earlier English researchers, like Spottiswoode and J. E. H. Gordon, employed a rapid break with the coil. Our current knowledge and experience allow us to understand why these coils, under the test conditions, didn’t show any remarkable phenomena, and why skilled experimenters missed many of the interesting effects that have been observed since.

In the experiments such as performed this evening, we operate the coil either from a specially constructed alternator capable of giving many thousands of reversals of current per second, or, by disruptively discharging a condenser through the primary, we set up a vibration in the secondary circuit of a frequency of many hundred thousand or millions per second, if we so desire; and in using either of these means we enter a field as yet unexplored.

In experiments like the ones conducted this evening, we either power the coil using a specially built alternator that can produce thousands of reversals of current per second, or we create a vibration in the secondary circuit with a disruptive discharge from a capacitor through the primary. This allows us to achieve a frequency of hundreds of thousands or even millions per second, if we want; and with either of these methods, we are venturing into an uncharted territory.

It is impossible to pursue an investigation in any novel line without finally making some interesting observation or learning some useful fact. That this statement is applicable to the subject of this lecture the many curious and unexpected phenomena which we observe afford a convincing proof. By way of illustration, take for instance the most obvious phenomena, those of the discharge of the induction coil.

It’s impossible to explore any new line of inquiry without eventually making some intriguing observations or discovering useful facts. The many strange and unexpected phenomena we encounter serve as clear evidence that this statement holds true for the topic of this lecture. To illustrate this point, let’s consider the most straightforward phenomena, specifically the discharge of the induction coil.

Here is a coil which is operated by currents vibrating with extreme rapidity, obtained by disruptively discharging a Leyden jar. It would not surprise a student were the lecturer to say that the secondary of this coil consists of a small length of comparatively stout wire; it would not surprise him were the lecturer to state that, in spite of this, the coil is capable of giving any potential which the best insulation of the turns is able to withstand; but although he may be prepared, and even be indifferent as to the anticipated result, yet the aspect of the discharge of the coil will surprise and interest him. Every one is familiar with the discharge of an ordinary coil; it need not be reproduced here. But, by way of contrast, here is a form of discharge of a coil, the primary current of which is vibrating several hundred thousand times per second. The discharge of an ordinary coil appears as a simple line or band of light. The discharge of this coil appears in the form of powerful brushes and luminous streams issuing from all points of the two straight wires attached to the terminals of the secondary. (Fig. 130.)

Here’s a coil that operates with currents vibrating at extremely high speeds, created by discharging a Leyden jar. A student wouldn’t be surprised if the lecturer mentioned that the secondary part of this coil is made up of a short length of relatively thick wire; they wouldn’t be surprised if the lecturer pointed out that, despite this, the coil can produce any voltage that the best insulation of the turns can handle. However, even if they were prepared and indifferent about the expected outcome, the sight of the coil's discharge would still surprise and interest them. Everyone is familiar with the discharge from a standard coil, so there's no need to go over that again. But to contrast, here’s the discharge from a coil whose primary current vibrates several hundred thousand times per second. The discharge from an ordinary coil looks like a simple line or band of light. In contrast, the discharge from this coil appears as powerful brushes and bright streams coming from all points of the two straight wires connected to the terminals of the secondary. (Fig. 130.)

Fig. 130, 131.
Fig. 130.Fig. 131.

Now compare this phenomenon which you have just witnessed [Pg 203]with the discharge of a Holtz or Wimshurst machine—that other interesting appliance so dear to the experimenter. What a difference there is between these phenomena! And yet, had I made the necessary arrangements—which could have been made easily, were it not that they would interfere with other experiments—I could have produced with this coil sparks which, had I the coil hidden from your view and only two knobs exposed, even the keenest observer among you would find it difficult, if not impossible, to distinguish from those of an influence or friction machine. This may be done in many ways—for instance, by operating the induction coil which charges the condenser from an alternating-current machine of very low frequency, and preferably adjusting the discharge circuit so that there are no oscillations set up in it. We then obtain in the secondary circuit, if the knobs are of the required size and properly set, a more or less[Pg 204] rapid succession of sparks of great intensity and small quantity, which possess the same brilliancy, and are accompanied by the same sharp crackling sound, as those obtained from a friction or influence machine.

Now compare this phenomenon that you just witnessed [Pg 203]with the output from a Holtz or Wimshurst machine—another interesting device that's beloved by experimenters. There's a huge difference between these phenomena! And yet, if I had made the necessary arrangements—which could have been done easily, if they wouldn't have interfered with other experiments—I could have produced sparks with this coil that, if I had concealed the coil from your view and only exposed two knobs, even the sharpest observer among you would find it hard, if not impossible, to tell them apart from those of an influence or friction machine. This can be done in several ways—for example, by running the induction coil that charges the condenser using an alternating-current machine of very low frequency and preferably adjusting the discharge circuit so that no oscillations are created in it. We then get in the secondary circuit, if the knobs are the right size and correctly set, a rapid succession of intense sparks in small quantity, which have the same brightness and are accompanied by the same sharp crackling sound as those produced by a friction or influence machine.

Another way is to pass through two primary circuits, having a common secondary, two currents of a slightly different period, which produce in the secondary circuit sparks occurring at comparatively long intervals. But, even with the means at hand this evening, I may succeed in imitating the spark of a Holtz machine. For this purpose I establish between the terminals of the coil which charges the condenser a long, unsteady arc, which is periodically interrupted by the upward current of air produced by it. To increase the current of air I place on each side of the arc, and close to it, a large plate of mica. The condenser charged from this coil discharges into the primary circuit of a second coil through a small air gap, which is necessary to produce a sudden rush of current through the primary. The scheme of connections in the present experiment is indicated in Fig. 131.

Another way is to go through two main circuits that share a common secondary, with two currents of slightly different periods, which create sparks in the secondary circuit that happen at relatively long intervals. But even with the tools available this evening, I might be able to recreate the spark from a Holtz machine. To do this, I set up a long, unstable arc between the terminals of the coil that charges the capacitor, which is periodically interrupted by the upward current of air it generates. To boost the air current, I place a large mica plate on either side of the arc, close to it. The capacitor charged from this coil discharges into the primary circuit of a second coil through a small air gap, which is necessary to create a sudden rush of current through the primary. The wiring setup for this experiment is shown in Fig. 131.

G is an ordinarily constructed alternator, supplying the primary P of an induction coil, the secondary S of which charges the condensers or jars C C. The terminals of the secondary are connected to the inside coatings of the jars, the outer coatings being connected to the ends of the primary p p of a second induction coil. This primary p p has a small air gap a b.

G is a standard alternator that provides the main P for an induction coil. The secondary S charges the condensers or jars C C. The terminals of the secondary are linked to the inner coatings of the jars, while the outer coatings are connected to the ends of the primary p p of another induction coil. This primary p p has a small air gap a b.

The secondary s of this coil is provided with knobs or spheres K K of the proper size and set at a distance suitable for the experiment.

The secondary s of this coil is equipped with knobs or spheres K K that are the right size and placed at a distance suitable for the experiment.

A long arc is established between the terminals A B of the first induction coil. M M are the mica plates.

A long arc is set up between the terminals A B of the first induction coil. M M are the mica plates.

Each time the arc is broken between A and B the jars are quickly charged and discharged through the primary p p, producing a snapping spark between the knobs K K. Upon the arc forming between A and B the potential falls, and the jars cannot be charged to such high potential as to break through the air gap a b until the arc is again broken by the draught.

Each time the connection is interrupted between A and B, the jars are quickly charged and discharged through the primary p p, creating a snapping spark between the knobs K K. When the connection is established between A and B, the potential drops, and the jars can't be charged to such a high potential to break through the air gap a b until the connection is broken again by the draft.

In this manner sudden impulses, at long intervals, are produced in the primary p p, which in the secondary s give a corresponding number of impulses of great intensity. If the secondary knobs or spheres, K K, are of the proper size, the sparks show much resemblance to those of a Holtz machine.

In this way, sudden impulses occur at long intervals in the primary p p, which in the secondary s create a corresponding number of high-intensity impulses. If the secondary knobs or spheres, K K, are the right size, the sparks appear quite similar to those produced by a Holtz machine.

But these two effects, which to the eye appear so very differ[Pg 205]ent, are only two of the many discharge phenomena. We only need to change the conditions of the test, and again we make other observations of interest.

But these two effects, which look so different to the eye, are just two of the many discharge phenomena. We just need to change the test conditions, and once again we’ll make other interesting observations.

When, instead of operating the induction coil as in the last two experiments, we operate it from a high frequency alternator, as in the next experiment, a systematic study of the phenomena is rendered much more easy. In such case, in varying the strength and frequency of the currents through the primary, we may observe five distinct forms of discharge, which I have described in my former paper on the subject before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, May 20, 1891.

When we use a high-frequency alternator to operate the induction coil instead of the method used in the previous two experiments, as we will do in the next experiment, it makes studying the phenomena much easier. In this case, by changing the strength and frequency of the currents through the primary, we can observe five distinct types of discharge, which I described in my earlier paper on this subject presented to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers on May 20, 1891.

It would take too much time, and it would lead us too far from the subject presented this evening, to reproduce all these forms, but it seems to me desirable to show you one of them. It is a brush discharge, which is interesting in more than one respect. Viewed from a near position it resembles much a jet of gas escaping under great pressure. We know that the phenomenon is due to the agitation of the molecules near the terminal, and we anticipate that some heat must be developed by the impact of the molecules against the terminal or against each other. Indeed, we find that the brush is hot, and only a little thought leads us to the conclusion that, could we but reach sufficiently high frequencies, we could produce a brush which would give intense light and heat, and which would resemble in every particular an ordinary flame, save, perhaps, that both phenomena might not be due to the same agent—save, perhaps, that chemical affinity might not be electrical in its nature.

It would take too much time and steer us too far from tonight's topic to go through all these forms, but I think it’s worth showing you one of them. It’s called a brush discharge, and it’s interesting for several reasons. When you look at it up close, it resembles a jet of gas escaping under high pressure. We know that this phenomenon happens because of the movement of molecules near the terminal, and we expect that some heat is generated by the impact of the molecules against the terminal or each other. In fact, we find that the brush is hot, and with a little thought, we can conclude that if we could achieve sufficiently high frequencies, we could create a brush that would produce intense light and heat, resembling an ordinary flame, except maybe that the two phenomena might not be caused by the same agent—except perhaps that chemical affinity might not be electrical in nature.

As the production of heat and light is here due to the impact of the molecules, or atoms of air, or something else besides, and, as we can augment the energy simply by raising the potential, we might, even with frequencies obtained from a dynamo machine, intensify the action to such a degree as to bring the terminal to melting heat. But with such low frequencies we would have to deal always with something of the nature of an electric current. If I approach a conducting object to the brush, a thin little spark passes, yet, even with the frequencies used this evening, the tendency to spark is not very great. So, for instance, if I hold a metallic sphere at some distance above the terminal, you may see the whole space between the terminal and sphere illuminated by the streams without the spark passing; and with the much higher frequencies obtainable by the disrup[Pg 206]tive discharge of a condenser, were it not for the sudden impulses, which are comparatively few in number, sparking would not occur even at very small distances. However, with incomparably higher frequencies, which we may yet find means to produce efficiently, and provided that electric impulses of such high frequencies could be transmitted through a conductor, the electrical characteristics of the brush discharge would completely vanish—no spark would pass, no shock would be felt—yet we would still have to deal with an electric phenomenon, but in the broad, modern interpretation of the word. In my first paper, before referred to, I have pointed out the curious properties of the brush, and described the best manner of producing it, but I have thought it worth while to endeavor to express myself more clearly in regard to this phenomenon, because of its absorbing interest.

As the production of heat and light happens due to the interaction of air molecules or atoms, or something similar, and since we can increase the energy simply by raising the potential, we could, even using frequencies from a dynamo, boost the action enough to make the terminal reach melting heat. However, with such low frequencies, we have to always deal with something resembling an electric current. If I bring a conductive object close to the brush, a small spark jumps, yet even with the frequencies used tonight, the tendency to spark isn't very strong. For example, if I hold a metal sphere a bit above the terminal, you can see the space between the terminal and the sphere lit up by the streams without a spark jumping; and with the much higher frequencies we can get from the disruptive discharge of a capacitor, if it weren't for the sudden impulses, which are relatively few, sparking wouldn't happen even at very short distances. However, with much higher frequencies that we might find ways to produce effectively, and if electrical impulses of such high frequencies could be transmitted through a conductor, the electrical characteristics of the brush discharge would completely disappear—no spark would jump, no shock would be felt—yet we would still be dealing with an electric phenomenon, but in the broad, modern sense of the term. In my first paper, previously mentioned, I pointed out the interesting properties of the brush and described the best way to produce it, but I thought it would be worthwhile to try to express myself more clearly regarding this phenomenon because of its fascinating nature.

When a coil is operated with currents of very high frequency, beautiful brush effects may be produced, even if the coil be of comparatively small dimensions. The experimenter may vary them in many ways, and, if it were for nothing else, they afford a pleasing sight. What adds to their interest is that they may be produced with one single terminal as well as with two—in fact, often better with one than with two.

When a coil is used with very high-frequency currents, it can create stunning brush effects, even if the coil is relatively small. The experimenter can change them in various ways, and even if it served no other purpose, they are enjoyable to watch. What makes them even more fascinating is that they can be created with just one terminal as well as two—in fact, it often works better with one than with two.

But of all the discharge phenomena observed, the most pleasing to the eye, and the most instructive, are those observed with a coil which is operated by means of the disruptive discharge of a condenser. The power of the brushes, the abundance of the sparks, when the conditions are patiently adjusted, is often amazing. With even a very small coil, if it be so well insulated as to stand a difference of potential of several thousand volts per turn, the sparks may be so abundant that the whole coil may appear a complete mass of fire.

But out of all the discharge effects seen, the most visually appealing and educational are those produced by a coil that operates through the disruptive discharge of a capacitor. The power of the brushes and the sheer number of sparks, when the settings are carefully fine-tuned, can be truly astounding. Even with a small coil, if it is well-insulated enough to handle a voltage difference of several thousand volts per turn, the sparks can be so plentiful that the entire coil looks like a blazing mass of fire.

Curiously enough the sparks, when the terminals of the coil are set at a considerable distance, seem to dart in every possible direction as though the terminals were perfectly independent of each other. As the sparks would soon destroy the insulation, it is necessary to prevent them. This is best done by immersing the coil in a good liquid insulator, such as boiled-out oil. Immersion in a liquid may be considered almost an absolute necessity for the continued and successful working of such a coil.

Curiously enough, when the terminals of the coil are set quite far apart, the sparks seem to shoot out in every direction as if the terminals are completely independent of each other. Since the sparks would quickly damage the insulation, it’s important to prevent this. The best way to do this is by submerging the coil in a good liquid insulator, like boiled oil. Immersing it in a liquid is nearly essential for the ongoing and successful operation of the coil.

It is, of course, out of the question, in an experimental lecture, with only a few minutes at disposal for the performance of each experiment, to show these discharge phenomena to advantage,[Pg 207] as, to produce each phenomenon at its best, a very careful adjustment is required. But even if imperfectly produced, as they are likely to be this evening, they are sufficiently striking to interest an intelligent audience.

It’s definitely not feasible, in a demonstration lecture with only a few minutes for each experiment, to showcase these discharge phenomena effectively,[Pg 207] since achieving the best results requires very precise adjustments. However, even if they come out imperfectly, as they probably will tonight, they are still impressive enough to capture the interest of a smart audience.

Before showing some of these curious effects I must, for the sake of completeness, give a short description of the coil and other apparatus used in the experiments with the disruptive discharge this evening.

Before demonstrating some of these interesting effects, I need to provide a brief description of the coil and other equipment used in tonight's experiments with the disruptive discharge for the sake of completeness.

Fig. 132. Fig. 132.

It is contained in a box B (Fig. 132) of thick boards of hard wood, covered on the outside with a zinc sheet Z, which is carefully soldered all around. It might be advisable, in a strictly scientific investigation, when accuracy is of great importance, to do away with the metal cover, as it might introduce many errors, principally on account of its complex action upon the coil, as a condenser of very small capacity and as an electrostatic and electromagnetic screen. When the coil is used for such experiments as are here contemplated, the employment of the metal cover offers some practical advantages, but these are not of sufficient importance to be dwelt upon.

It is contained in a box B (Fig. 132) made of thick hardwood, covered on the outside with a zinc sheet Z, which is securely soldered all around. It might be wise, in a strictly scientific investigation where accuracy is crucial, to remove the metal cover, as it could introduce several errors, primarily due to its complex interaction with the coil, acting as a condenser of very low capacity and serving as an electrostatic and electromagnetic shield. When the coil is used for experiments like those discussed here, using the metal cover has some practical advantages, but these aren't significant enough to dwell on.

The coil should be placed symmetrically to the metal cover,[Pg 208] and the space between should, of course, not be too small, certainly not less than, say, five centimetres, but much more if possible; especially the two sides of the zinc box, which are at right angles to the axis of the coil, should be sufficiently remote from the latter, as otherwise they might impair its action and be a source of loss.

The coil should be positioned symmetrically to the metal cover,[Pg 208] and the gap between them shouldn’t be too narrow—definitely not less than five centimeters, but ideally much more. In particular, the two sides of the zinc box, which are perpendicular to the axis of the coil, should be far enough away from it, or else they could interfere with its function and cause losses.

The coil consists of two spools of hard rubber R R, held apart at a distance of 10 centimetres by bolts C and nuts n, likewise of hard rubber. Each spool comprises a tube T of approximately 8 centimetres inside diameter, and 3 millimetres thick, upon which are screwed two flanges F F, 24 centimetres square, the space between the flanges being about 3 centimetres. The secondary, S S, of the best gutta percha-covered wire, has 26 layers, 10 turns in each, giving for each half a total of 260 turns. The two halves are wound oppositely and connected in series, the connection between both being made over the primary. This disposition, besides being convenient, has the advantage that when the coil is well balanced—that is, when both of its terminals T1, T1, are connected to bodies or devices of equal capacity—there is not much danger of breaking through to the primary, and the insulation between the primary and the secondary need not be thick. In using the coil it is advisable to attach to both terminals devices of nearly equal capacity, as, when the capacity of the terminals is not equal, sparks will be apt to pass to the primary. To avoid this, the middle point of the secondary may be connected to the primary, but this is not always practicable.

The coil consists of two spools made of hard rubber R R, spaced 10 centimeters apart by bolts C and nuts n, which are also made of hard rubber. Each spool has a tube T that measures about 8 centimeters in inside diameter and is 3 millimeters thick, with two flanges F F that are 24 centimeters square screwed onto it, creating a space of about 3 centimeters between the flanges. The secondary winding S S is made from high-quality gutta percha-covered wire, consisting of 26 layers with 10 turns in each layer, amounting to a total of 260 turns for each half. The two halves are wound in opposite directions and connected in series, with the connection between them made via the primary winding. This setup is not only convenient but also ensures that when the coil is balanced—meaning both terminals T1, T1 are linked to bodies or devices of equal capacity—there’s minimal risk of breaking through to the primary, allowing for thinner insulation between the primary and secondary. When using the coil, it's advisable to connect devices of almost equal capacity to both terminals, as an imbalance can cause sparks to reach the primary. To prevent this, the midpoint of the secondary can be connected to the primary, though this isn’t always feasible.

The primary P P is wound in two parts, and oppositely, upon a wooden spool w, and the four ends are led out of the oil through hard rubber tubes t t. The ends of the secondary T1 T1, are also led out of the oil through rubber tubes t1 t1 of great thickness. The primary and secondary layers are insulated by cotton cloth, the thickness of the insulation, of course, bearing some proportion to the difference of potential between the turns of the different layers. Each half of the primary has four layers, 24 turns in each, this giving a total of 96 turns. When both the parts are connected in series, this gives a ratio of conversion of about 1:2.7, and with the primaries in multiple, 1:5.4; but in operating with very rapidly alternating currents this ratio does not convey even an approximate idea of the ratio of the e. m. f's. in the primary and secondary circuits. The coil is held in position in the oil on wooden supports, there being about 5 centimetres[Pg 209] thickness of oil all round. Where the oil is not specially needed, the space is filled with pieces of wood, and for this purpose principally the wooden box B surrounding the whole is used.

The main P P is wound in two parts, opposite each other, on a wooden spool w, and the four ends are led out of the oil through hard rubber tubes t t. The ends of the secondary T1 T1 are also led out of the oil through thick rubber tubes t1 t1. The primary and secondary layers are insulated with cotton cloth, and the thickness of the insulation is proportional to the difference in potential between the turns of the different layers. Each half of the primary has four layers, with 24 turns each, totaling 96 turns. When both parts are connected in series, this results in a conversion ratio of about 1:2.7, and with the primaries in parallel, 1:5.4. However, when operating with very rapidly alternating currents, this ratio does not accurately reflect the ratio of the EMF's in the primary and secondary circuits. The coil is kept in place in the oil on wooden supports, with about 5 centimeters[Pg 209] of oil all around it. Where oil is not specifically needed, the space is filled with pieces of wood, primarily using the wooden box B that surrounds everything.

The construction here shown is, of course, not the best on general principles, but I believe it is a good and convenient one for the production of effects in which an excessive potential and a very small current are needed.

The construction shown here isn't the best in general, but I think it's a good and convenient option for achieving effects where a high voltage and a very small current are required.

In connection with the coil I use either the ordinary form of discharger or a modified form. In the former I have introduced two changes which secure some advantages, and which are obvious. If they are mentioned, it is only in the hope that some experimenter may find them of use.

In relation to the coil, I use either the standard type of discharger or a modified version. In the standard version, I have made two changes that offer some benefits, and these are clear. If I mention them, it’s only in the hope that some experimenter might find them helpful.

One of the changes is that the adjustable knobs A and B (Fig. 133), of the discharger are held in jaws of brass, J J, by spring pressure, this allowing of turning them successively into different positions, and so doing away with the tedious process of frequent polishing up.

One of the changes is that the adjustable knobs A and B (Fig. 133) of the discharger are secured in brass jaws, J J, by spring pressure, allowing them to be turned into different positions one after the other, eliminating the tedious process of frequent polishing.

Fig. 133. Fig. 133.

The other change consists in the employment of a strong electromagnet N S, which is placed with its axis at right angles to the line joining the knobs A and B, and produces a strong magnetic field between them. The pole pieces of the magnet are movable and properly formed so as to protrude between the brass knobs, in order to make the field as intense as possible; but to prevent the discharge from jumping to the magnet the pole pieces are protected by a layer of mica, M M, of sufficient thickness; s1 s1 and s2 s2 are screws for fastening the wires. On each side one of the screws is for large and the other for small wires. L L are screws for fixing in position the rods R R, which support the knobs.[Pg 210]

The other change is the use of a strong electromagnet N S, positioned so its axis is at a right angle to the line connecting the knobs A and B, creating a strong magnetic field between them. The pole pieces of the magnet are adjustable and shaped to extend between the brass knobs to maximize the intensity of the field; however, to prevent the discharge from jumping to the magnet, the pole pieces are covered with a layer of mica, M M, that is thick enough. s1 s1 and s2 s2 are screws used to secure the wires. On each side, one screw is for large wires and the other is for small wires. L L are screws that hold the rods R R, which support the knobs.[Pg 210]

In another arrangement with the magnet I take the discharge between the rounded pole pieces themselves, which in such case are insulated and preferably provided with polished brass caps.

In a different setup with the magnet, I take the discharge directly between the rounded pole pieces, which are insulated in this case and ideally fitted with polished brass caps.

The employment of an intense magnetic field is of advantage principally when the induction coil or transformer which charges the condenser is operated by currents of very low frequency. In such a case the number of the fundamental discharges between the knobs may be so small as to render the currents produced in the secondary unsuitable for many experiments. The intense magnetic field then serves to blow out the arc between the knobs as soon as it is formed, and the fundamental discharges occur in quicker succession.

Using a strong magnetic field is mainly helpful when the induction coil or transformer that charges the capacitor is powered by very low frequency currents. In this situation, the number of primary discharges between the terminals can be so few that the currents generated in the secondary are not suitable for many experiments. The strong magnetic field quickly extinguishes the arc between the terminals as soon as it forms, allowing the primary discharges to happen more rapidly.

Fig. 134. Fig. 134.

Instead of the magnet, a draught or blast of air may be employed with some advantage. In this case the arc is preferably established between the knobs A B, in Fig. 131 (the knobs a b being generally joined, or entirely done away with), as in this disposition the arc is long and unsteady, and is easily affected by the draught.

Instead of using a magnet, you can take advantage of a draft or blast of air. In this scenario, it's better to create the arc between the knobs A B in Fig. 131 (with the knobs a b usually connected or completely removed), because this setup results in a long and unstable arc that is easily influenced by the draft.

When a magnet is employed to break the arc, it is better to choose the connection indicated diagrammatically in Fig. 134, as in this case the currents forming the arc are much more powerful, and the magnetic field exercises a greater influence. The use of the magnet permits, however, of the arc being replaced by a vacuum tube, but I have encountered great difficulties in working with an exhausted tube.

When a magnet is used to break the arc, it's better to choose the connection shown in Fig. 134, because in this scenario, the currents forming the arc are much stronger, and the magnetic field has a greater effect. However, using the magnet allows the arc to be replaced by a vacuum tube, but I've faced significant challenges when working with an exhausted tube.

The other form of discharger used in these and similar experiments is indicated in Figs. 135 and 136. It consists of a number of brass pieces c c (Fig. 135), each of which comprises a spherical middle portion m with an extension e below—which is merely used to fasten the piece in a lathe when polishing up the discharging[Pg 211] surface—and a column above, which consists of a knurled flange f surmounted by a threaded stem l carrying a nut n, by means of which a wire is fastened to the column. The flange f conveniently serves for holding the brass piece when fastening the wire, and also for turning it in any position when it becomes necessary to present a fresh discharging surface. Two stout strips of hard rubber R R, with planed grooves g g (Fig. 136) to fit the middle portion of the pieces c c, serve to clamp the latter and hold them firmly in position by means of two bolts C C (of which only one is shown) passing through the ends of the strips.

The other type of discharger used in these and similar experiments is shown in Figs. 135 and 136. It consists of several brass parts c c (Fig. 135), each with a spherical middle section m and a lower extension e that’s just for securing the piece in a lathe while polishing the discharging[Pg 211] surface. Above that, there's a column featuring a knurled flange f topped with a threaded stem l that holds a nut n, which is used to attach a wire to the column. The flange f is helpful for gripping the brass piece when securing the wire and for rotating it to access a clean discharging surface when needed. Two sturdy strips of hard rubber R R, with planed grooves g g (Fig. 136) designed to fit the middle section of the pieces c c, are used to clamp the latter and hold them securely in place with two bolts C C (only one of which is shown) running through the ends of the strips.

Fig. 135. Fig. 135.
Fig. 136. Fig. 136.

In the use of this kind of discharger I have found three principal advantages over the ordinary form. First, the dielectric strength of a given total width of air space is greater when a great many small air gaps are used instead of one, which permits of working with a smaller length of air gap, and that means smaller loss and less deterioration of the metal; secondly, by reason of splitting the arc up into smaller arcs, the polished surfaces are made to last much longer; and, thirdly, the appa[Pg 212]ratus affords some gauge in the experiments. I usually set the pieces by putting between them sheets of uniform thickness at a certain very small distance which is known from the experiments of Sir William Thomson to require a certain electromotive force to be bridged by the spark.

In using this type of discharger, I've found three main advantages over the typical design. First, the dielectric strength of a specific total width of air space is greater when many small air gaps are used instead of just one, allowing for a shorter air gap, which means less energy loss and reduced wear on the metal. Second, breaking the arc into smaller arcs makes the polished surfaces last much longer. Third, the apparatus provides some measurement during the experiments. I usually position the pieces by placing sheets of consistent thickness between them at a very small distance, which, according to Sir William Thomson's experiments, requires a specific electromotive force to be crossed by the spark.

It should, of course, be remembered that the sparking distance is much diminished as the frequency is increased. By taking any number of spaces the experimenter has a rough idea of the electromotive force, and he finds it easier to repeat an experiment, as he has not the trouble of setting the knobs again and again. With this kind of discharger I have been able to maintain an oscillating motion without any spark being visible with the naked eye between the knobs, and they would not show a very appreciable rise in temperature. This form of discharge also lends itself to many arrangements of condensers and circuits which are often very convenient and time-saving. I have used it preferably in a disposition similar to that indicated in Fig. 131, when the currents forming the arc are small.

It should be noted that the sparking distance decreases significantly as the frequency increases. By using various settings, the experimenter can get a rough estimate of the electromotive force and finds it easier to repeat the experiment, as there's no hassle of readjusting the knobs repeatedly. With this type of discharger, I’ve been able to maintain an oscillating motion without any sparks being visible to the naked eye between the knobs, and they wouldn’t show a noticeable rise in temperature. This type of discharge also supports many configurations of capacitors and circuits, which are often very convenient and save time. I have preferred using it in a setup similar to that shown in Fig. 131, when the currents forming the arc are small.

I may here mention that I have also used dischargers with single or multiple air gaps, in which the discharge surfaces were rotated with great speed. No particular advantage was, however, gained by this method, except in cases where the currents from the condenser were large and the keeping cool of the surfaces was necessary, and in cases when, the discharge not being oscillating of itself, the arc as soon as established was broken by the air current, thus starting the vibration at intervals in rapid succession. I have also used mechanical interrupters in many ways. To avoid the difficulties with frictional contacts, the preferred plan adopted was to establish the arc and rotate through it at great speed a rim of mica provided with many holes and fastened to a steel plate. It is understood, of course, that the employment of a magnet, air current, or other interrupter, produces no effect worth noticing, unless the self-induction, capacity and resistance are so related that there are oscillations set up upon each interruption.

I should mention that I have also used dischargers with single or multiple air gaps, where the discharge surfaces were rotated at high speeds. However, this method didn’t provide any specific advantages, except in situations where the currents from the condenser were large and it was important to keep the surfaces cool. Additionally, in cases where the discharge wasn't oscillating on its own, the arc, once established, was interrupted by the air current, which started the vibration at intervals quickly. I have also utilized mechanical interrupters in various ways. To avoid issues with frictional contacts, the preferred approach was to establish the arc and rotate a rim of mica, which had many holes, at high speeds while it was attached to a steel plate. It’s important to note that using a magnet, air current, or other interrupters doesn't produce any noticeable effect unless the self-induction, capacitance, and resistance are configured in such a way that oscillations occur with each interruption.

I will now endeavor to show you some of the most noteworthy of these discharge phenomena.

I will now try to show you some of the most notable examples of these discharge phenomena.

I have stretched across the room two ordinary cotton covered wires, each about seven metres in length. They are supported on insulating cords at a distance of about thirty centimetres. I attach now to each of the terminals of the coil one of the wires,[Pg 213] and set the coil in action. Upon turning the lights off in the room you see the wires strongly illuminated by the streams issuing abundantly from their whole surface in spite of the cotton covering, which may even be very thick. When the experiment is performed under good conditions, the light from the wires is sufficiently intense to allow distinguishing the objects in a room. To produce the best result it is, of course, necessary to adjust carefully the capacity of the jars, the arc between the knobs and the length of the wires. My experience is that calculation of the length of the wires leads, in such case, to no result whatever. The experimenter will do best to take the wires at the start very long, and then adjust by cutting off first long pieces, and then smaller and smaller ones as he approaches the right length.

I have stretched two regular cotton-covered wires across the room, each about seven meters long. They are held up by insulating cords at a distance of about thirty centimeters. I’m now attaching one of the wires to each terminal of the coil and getting it started. When I turn off the lights in the room, you can see the wires glow brightly with streams of light coming out from their entire surface, even through the thick cotton covering. If the experiment is done under good conditions, the light from the wires is bright enough to see objects in the room. To get the best result, it’s important to carefully adjust the capacity of the jars, the gap between the knobs, and the length of the wires. In my experience, calculating the length of the wires doesn’t really help. It’s better for the experimenter to start with very long wires and then adjust by cutting off larger pieces first, and then smaller ones as they get closer to the right length.

A convenient way is to use an oil condenser of very small capacity, consisting of two small adjustable metal plates, in connection with this and similar experiments. In such case I take wires rather short and at the beginning set the condenser plates at maximum distance. If the streams from the wires increase by approach of the plates, the length of the wires is about right; if they diminish, the wires are too long for that frequency and potential. When a condenser is used in connection with experiments with such a coil, it should be an oil condenser by all means, as in using an air condenser considerable energy might be wasted. The wires leading to the plates in the oil should be very thin, heavily coated with some insulating compound, and provided with a conducting covering—this preferably extending under the surface of the oil. The conducting cover should not be too near the terminals, or ends, of the wire, as a spark would be apt to jump from the wire to it. The conducting coating is used to diminish the air losses, in virtue of its action as an electrostatic screen. As to the size of the vessel containing the oil, and the size of the plates, the experimenter gains at once an idea from a rough trial. The size of the plates in oil is, however, calculable, as the dielectric losses are very small.

A practical method is to use a small oil condenser that has two adjustable metal plates, which is useful for this and similar experiments. In this case, I use relatively short wires and start by setting the condenser plates at their maximum distance. If the flow from the wires increases as the plates move closer together, the wire length is likely correct; if it decreases, the wires are too long for that frequency and potential. When using a condenser with such a coil, it’s essential to use an oil condenser since an air condenser could waste a significant amount of energy. The wires going to the plates in the oil should be very thin, heavily coated with an insulating material, and equipped with a conductive cover—ideally extending below the surface of the oil. The conductive cover shouldn’t be too close to the ends of the wire, as a spark might jump from the wire to it. The conductive coating helps reduce air losses due to its function as an electrostatic shield. As for the size of the oil container and the plates, the experimenter can quickly get a sense through rough trials. However, the size of the plates in oil can be calculated, since the dielectric losses are minimal.

In the preceding experiment it is of considerable interest to know what relation the quantity of the light emitted bears to the frequency and potential of the electric impulses. My opinion is that the heat as well as light effects produced should be proportionate, under otherwise equal conditions of test, to the product of frequency and square of potential, but the experimental verification of the law, whatever it may be, would be exceedingly[Pg 214] difficult. One thing is certain, at any rate, and that is, that in augmenting the potential and frequency we rapidly intensify the streams; and, though it may be very sanguine, it is surely not altogether hopeless to expect that we may succeed in producing a practical illuminant on these lines. We would then be simply using burners or flames, in which there would be no chemical process, no consumption of material, but merely a transfer of energy, and which would, in all probability, emit more light and less heat than ordinary flames.

In the previous experiment, it's quite interesting to understand how the amount of light emitted relates to the frequency and strength of the electric impulses. I believe that both heat and light effects produced should be proportional, under otherwise similar test conditions, to the product of frequency and the square of the potential. However, verifying this law, whatever it may be, would be really challenging. One thing is certain: as we increase the potential and frequency, we quickly boost the streams. While it might be overly optimistic, it’s not entirely unrealistic to hope that we could create a practical light source based on this concept. We would essentially be using burners or flames that involve no chemical processes, no material consumption, just energy transfer, and which would likely emit more light and less heat than regular flames.

Fig. 137. Fig. 137.

The luminous intensity of the streams is, of course, considerably increased when they are focused upon a small surface. This may be shown by the following experiment:

The brightness of the streams is definitely much stronger when they're directed at a small surface. This can be demonstrated by the following experiment:

I attach to one of the terminals of the coil a wire w (Fig. 137), bent in a circle of about 30 centimetres in diameter, and to the other terminal I fasten a small brass sphere s, the surface of the wire being preferably equal to the surface of the sphere, and the centre of the latter being in a line at right angles to the plane of the wire circle and passing through its centre. When the discharge is established under proper conditions, a luminous hollow cone is formed, and in the dark one-half of the brass sphere is strongly illuminated, as shown in the cut.

I connect a wire w (Fig. 137) to one of the terminals of the coil, shaped into a circle with a diameter of about 30 centimeters, and I attach a small brass sphere s to the other terminal. The surface area of the wire should ideally match the surface area of the sphere, with the center of the sphere aligned perpendicular to the plane of the wire circle and going through its center. When the discharge occurs under the right conditions, a glowing hollow cone is created, and in the dark, one half of the brass sphere is brightly lit, as illustrated in the image.

By some artifice or other it is easy to concentrate the streams[Pg 215] upon small surfaces and to produce very strong light effects. Two thin wires may thus be rendered intensely luminous.

By using some clever trick, it's simple to focus beams[Pg 215] onto small surfaces and create very bright light effects. This can make two thin wires glow extremely brightly.

In order to intensify the streams the wires should be very thin and short; but as in this case their capacity would be generally too small for the coil—at least for such a one as the present—it is necessary to augment the capacity to the required value, while, at the same time, the surface of the wires remains very small. This may be done in many ways.

To increase the current, the wires should be very thin and short; however, in this case, their capacity would typically be too small for the coil—at least for the current one—so it’s important to increase the capacity to the needed level while keeping the surface area of the wires very small. There are several ways to achieve this.

Fig. 138. Fig. 138.

Here, for instance, I have two plates, R R, of hard rubber (Fig. 138), upon which I have glued two very thin wires w w, so as to form a name. The wires may be bare or covered with the best insulation—it is immaterial for the success of the experiment. Well insulated wires, if anything, are preferable. On the back of each plate, indicated by the shaded portion, is a tinfoil coating t t. The plates are placed in line at a sufficient distance to prevent a spark passing from one wire to the other. The two tinfoil coatings I have joined by a conductor C, and the two wires I presently connect to the terminals of the coil. It is now easy, by varying the strength and frequency of the currents through the primary, to find a point at which the capacity of the system is best suited to the conditions, and the wires become so strongly luminous that, when the light in the room is turned off the name formed by them appears in brilliant letters.

Here, for example, I have two plates, R R, made of hard rubber (Fig. 138), onto which I've glued two very thin wires w w to create a name. The wires can be bare or insulated—it doesn't matter for the experiment's success. Insulated wires are actually preferable. On the back of each plate, indicated by the shaded area, there’s a tinfoil coating t t. The plates are aligned at a distance that prevents a spark from jumping between the wires. I've connected the two tinfoil coatings with a conductor C, and I’m currently connecting the two wires to the terminals of the coil. Now, by adjusting the strength and frequency of the currents in the primary, I can find a point where the system's capacity matches the conditions best, and the wires glow so brightly that when the room lights are turned off, the name formed by them appears in brilliant letters.

It is perhaps preferable to perform this experiment with a coil operated from an alternator of high frequency, as then,[Pg 216] owing to the harmonic rise and fall, the streams are very uniform, though they are less abundant than when produced with such a coil as the present one. This experiment, however, may be performed with low frequencies, but much less satisfactorily.

It might be better to conduct this experiment using a coil powered by a high-frequency alternator because then,[Pg 216] due to the harmonic fluctuations, the streams are very consistent, even though they are not as plentiful as those generated by the current coil. This experiment can be done with low frequencies as well, but the results will be much less satisfactory.

Fig. 139. Fig. 139.

When two wires, attached to the terminals of the coil, are set at the proper distance, the streams between them may be so intense as to produce a continuous luminous sheet. To show this phenomenon I have here two circles, C and c (Fig. 139), of rather stout wire, one being about 80 centimetres and the other 30 centimetres in diameter. To each of the terminals of the coil I attach one of the circles. The supporting wires are so bent that the circles may be placed in the same plane, coinciding as nearly as possible. When the light in the room is turned off and the coil set to work, you see the whole space between the wires uniformly filled with streams, forming a luminous disc, which could be seen from a considerable distance, such is the intensity of the streams. The outer circle could have been much larger than the present one; in fact, with this coil I have used much larger circles, and I have been able to produce a strongly luminous sheet, covering an area of more than one square metre, which is a remarkable effect with this very small coil. To avoid uncer[Pg 217]tainty, the circle has been taken smaller, and the area is now about 0.43 square metre.

When two wires connected to the terminals of the coil are positioned at the right distance, the streams between them can become so intense that they create a continuous glowing sheet. To demonstrate this effect, I have two circles, C and c (Fig. 139), made from fairly thick wire, one about 80 centimeters in diameter and the other about 30 centimeters. I connect one of the circles to each terminal of the coil. The supporting wires are bent so that the circles can be aligned in the same plane as closely as possible. When the room lights are turned off and the coil is activated, the entire space between the wires is uniformly filled with streams, forming a luminous disc that can be seen from a considerable distance due to the intensity of the streams. The outer circle could have been much larger than the current size; in fact, I've used much larger circles with this coil and managed to produce a brightly lit sheet covering an area of more than one square meter, which is quite impressive for such a small coil. To eliminate uncertainty, a smaller circle has been used, and the area is now approximately 0.43 square meters.

The frequency of the vibration, and the quickness of succession of the sparks between the knobs, affect to a marked degree the appearance of the streams. When the frequency is very low, the air gives way in more or less the same manner, as by a steady difference of potential, and the streams consist of distinct threads, generally mingled with thin sparks, which probably correspond to the successive discharges occurring between the knobs. But when the frequency is extremely high, and the arc of the discharge produces a very loud and smooth sound—showing both that oscillation takes place and that the sparks succeed each other with great rapidity—then the luminous streams formed are perfectly uniform. To reach this result very small coils and jars of small capacity should be used. I take two tubes of thick Bohemian glass, about 5 centimetres in diameter and 20 centimetres long. In each of the tubes I slip a primary of very thick copper wire. On the top of each tube I wind a secondary of much thinner gutta-percha covered wire. The two secondaries I connect in series, the primaries preferably in multiple arc. The tubes are then placed in a large glass vessel, at a distance of 10 to 15 centimetres from each other, on insulating supports, and the vessel is filled with boiled-out oil, the oil reaching about an inch above the tubes. The free ends of the secondary are lifted out of the coil and placed parallel to each other at a distance of about ten centimetres. The ends which are scraped should be dipped in the oil. Two four-pint jars joined in series may be used to discharge through the primary. When the necessary adjustments in the length and distance of the wires above the oil and in the arc of discharge are made, a luminous sheet is produced between the wires which is perfectly smooth and textureless, like the ordinary discharge through a moderately exhausted tube.

The frequency of the vibration and the speed at which sparks jump between the knobs significantly influence the appearance of the streams. When the frequency is very low, the air behaves similarly to how it would with a steady difference in potential, and the streams consist of distinct threads, usually mixed with thin sparks, which likely correspond to the successive discharges occurring between the knobs. However, when the frequency is extremely high, and the arc of the discharge produces a very loud and smooth sound—indicating that oscillation is happening and the sparks are occurring rapidly—then the luminous streams formed are completely uniform. To achieve this, you should use very small coils and jars with low capacity. I use two tubes made of thick Bohemian glass, about 5 centimeters in diameter and 20 centimeters long. Inside each tube, I insert a primary winding of very thick copper wire. On top of each tube, I wrap a secondary winding made of much thinner gutta-percha-covered wire. The two secondaries are connected in series, and the primaries are preferably set up in multiple arcs. The tubes are then placed in a large glass vessel, about 10 to 15 centimeters apart on insulating supports, and the vessel is filled with boiled-out oil, which rises about an inch above the tubes. The free ends of the secondary wires are pulled out of the coil and arranged parallel to each other about ten centimeters apart. The scraped ends should be dipped in the oil. You can use two four-pint jars connected in series to discharge through the primary. Once the necessary adjustments in the length and spacing of the wires above the oil and in the arc of discharge are made, a luminous sheet appears between the wires that is perfectly smooth and textureless, similar to a normal discharge through a moderately exhausted tube.

I have purposely dwelt upon this apparently insignificant experiment. In trials of this kind the experimenter arrives at the startling conclusion that, to pass ordinary luminous discharges through gases, no particular degree of exhaustion is needed, but that the gas may be at ordinary or even greater pressure. To accomplish this, a very high frequency is essential; a high potential is likewise required, but this is merely an incidental necessity. These experiments teach us that, in endeavoring to dis[Pg 218]cover novel methods of producing light by the agitation of atoms, or molecules, of a gas, we need not limit our research to the vacuum tube, but may look forward quite seriously to the possibility of obtaining the light effects without the use of any vessel whatever, with air at ordinary pressure.

I've deliberately focused on this seemingly minor experiment. In these types of trials, the experimenter reaches the surprising conclusion that, to pass regular luminous discharges through gases, no specific level of vacuum is necessary; the gas can be at normal or even higher pressure. To achieve this, a very high frequency is crucial; a high potential is also needed, but that's just a secondary requirement. These experiments show us that in trying to find new ways to produce light by agitating the atoms or molecules of a gas, we don't have to limit our research to vacuum tubes. Instead, we can seriously consider the possibility of achieving light effects without using any container at all, just with air at regular pressure.

Such discharges of very high frequency, which render luminous the air at ordinary pressures, we have probably occasion often to witness in Nature. I have no doubt that if, as many believe, the aurora borealis is produced by sudden cosmic disturbances, such as eruptions at the sun's surface, which set the electrostatic charge of the earth in an extremely rapid vibration, the red glow observed is not confined to the upper rarefied strata of the air, but the discharge traverses, by reason of its very high frequency, also the dense atmosphere in the form of a glow, such as we ordinarily produce in a slightly exhausted tube. If the frequency were very low, or even more so, if the charge were not at all vibrating, the dense air would break down as in a lightning discharge. Indications of such breaking down of the lower dense strata of the air have been repeatedly observed at the occurrence of this marvelous phenomenon; but if it does occur, it can only be attributed to the fundamental disturbances, which are few in number, for the vibration produced by them would be far too rapid to allow a disruptive break. It is the original and irregular impulses which affect the instruments; the superimposed vibrations probably pass unnoticed.

Such high-frequency discharges, which make the air glow at normal pressures, are likely something we often see in nature. I’m convinced that if, as many suggest, the aurora borealis is caused by sudden cosmic events, like eruptions on the sun’s surface that rapidly vibrate the earth’s electrostatic charge, the red light we see isn’t just limited to the thin upper layers of the atmosphere; rather, the discharge, due to its very high frequency, also travels through the denser atmosphere as a glow, similar to what we create in a slightly exhausted tube. If the frequency were very low, or if the charge weren't vibrating at all, the dense air would break down like it does during a lightning strike. Signs of such breakdown in the lower dense layers of the air have been repeatedly noted during this incredible phenomenon; however, if it does happen, it can only be linked to the fundamental disturbances, which are limited in number, as the vibrations they create would be too rapid to cause a disruptive breakdown. It’s the original and irregular impulses that affect the instruments; the overlapping vibrations likely go unnoticed.

When an ordinary low frequency discharge is passed through moderately rarefied air, the air assumes a purplish hue. If by some means or other we increase the intensity of the molecular, or atomic, vibration, the gas changes to a white color. A similar change occurs at ordinary pressures with electric impulses of very high frequency. If the molecules of the air around a wire are moderately agitated, the brush formed is reddish or violet; if the vibration is rendered sufficiently intense, the streams become white. We may accomplish this in various ways. In the experiment before shown with the two wires across the room, I have endeavored to secure the result by pushing to a high value both the frequency and potential; in the experiment with the thin wires glued on the rubber plate I have concentrated the action upon a very small surface—in other words, I have worked with a great electric density.

When a regular low-frequency electrical discharge passes through moderately rarefied air, the air takes on a purplish color. If we find a way to boost the intensity of the molecular or atomic vibrations, the gas turns white. A similar change happens at normal pressures with very high-frequency electrical impulses. If the molecules of the air around a wire are moderately agitated, the resulting brush is reddish or violet; but if the vibrations are intense enough, the streams become white. We can achieve this in various ways. In the previous experiment with the two wires across the room, I tried to achieve this effect by increasing both the frequency and potential to high values. In the experiment with the thin wires glued to the rubber plate, I focused the effect on a very small area—in other words, I worked with a high electric density.

Fig. 140. Fig. 140.

A most curious form of discharge is observed with such a coil [Pg 219]when the frequency and potential are pushed to the extreme limit. To perform the experiment, every part of the coil should be heavily insulated, and only two small spheres—or, better still, two sharp-edged metal discs (d d, Fig. 140) of no more than a few centimetres in diameter—should be exposed to the air. The coil here used is immersed in oil, and the ends of the secondary reaching out of the oil are covered with an air-tight cover of hard rubber of great thickness. All cracks, if there are any, should be carefully stopped up, so that the brush discharge cannot form anywhere except on the small spheres or plates which are exposed to the air. In this case, since there are no large plates or other bodies of capacity attached to the terminals, the coil is capable of an extremely rapid vibration. The potential may be raised by increasing, as far as the experimenter judges proper, the rate of change of the primary current. With a coil not widely differing from the present, it is best to connect the two primaries in multiple arc; but if the secondary should have a much greater number of turns the primaries should preferably be used in series, as otherwise the vibration might be too fast for the secondary. It occurs under these conditions that misty white streams break forth from the edges of the discs and spread out phantom-like into space. With this coil, when fairly well produced, they are about 25 to 30 centimetres long. When the hand is held against them no sensation is produced, and a spark, causing a shock, jumps from[Pg 220] the terminal only upon the hand being brought much nearer. If the oscillation of the primary current is rendered intermittent by some means or other, there is a corresponding throbbing of the streams, and now the hand or other conducting object may be brought in still greater proximity to the terminal without a spark being caused to jump.

A very interesting type of discharge can be seen with this coil [Pg 219] when the frequency and voltage are pushed to their limits. To conduct the experiment, every part of the coil needs to be well-insulated, and only two small spheres—or preferably, two sharp-edged metal discs (d d, Fig. 140) that are just a few centimeters in diameter—should be left exposed to the air. The coil used here is immersed in oil, and the ends of the secondary that extend out of the oil are covered with a thick, airtight rubber cover. Any cracks must be sealed carefully to ensure that the brush discharge can only form on the small spheres or plates that are exposed. In this setup, since there are no large plates or capacitive bodies connected to the terminals, the coil can vibrate extremely quickly. The voltage can be increased by raising the rate of change of the primary current as deemed appropriate by the experimenter. For a coil similar to this one, it's best to connect the two primaries in a multiple arc; however, if the secondary has significantly more turns, the primaries should be connected in series, as otherwise the vibration might be too rapid for the secondary. Under these circumstances, misty white streams emerge from the edges of the discs and extend out into space like phantoms. When properly produced with this coil, they measure about 25 to 30 centimeters long. If you hold your hand against them, you won’t feel anything, and a spark that causes a shock only jumps from [Pg 220] the terminal when your hand gets much closer. If the oscillation of the primary current is made intermittent by some means, the streams pulse accordingly, and now your hand or another conductive object can be brought even closer to the terminal without causing a spark to jump.

Among the many beautiful phenomena which may be produced with such a coil, I have here selected only those which appear to possess some features of novelty, and lead us to some conclusions of interest. One will not find it at all difficult to produce in the laboratory, by means of it, many other phenomena which appeal to the eye even more than these here shown, but present no particular feature of novelty.

Among the many beautiful phenomena that can be created with such a coil, I have chosen only those that seem to have some new features and lead us to interesting conclusions. It’s not hard at all to produce in the lab many other phenomena that are even more visually appealing than these shown here, but they don’t have any particular novel aspect.

Early experimenters describe the display of sparks produced by an ordinary large induction coil upon an insulating plate separating the terminals. Quite recently Siemens performed some experiments in which fine effects were obtained, which were seen by many with interest. No doubt large coils, even if operated with currents of low frequencies, are capable of producing beautiful effects. But the largest coil ever made could not, by far, equal the magnificent display of streams and sparks obtained from such a disruptive discharge coil when properly adjusted. To give an idea, a coil such as the present one will cover easily a plate of one metre in diameter completely with the streams. The best way to perform such experiments is to take a very thin rubber or a glass plate and glue on one side of it a narrow ring of tinfoil of very large diameter, and on the other a circular washer, the centre of the latter coinciding with that of the ring, and the surfaces of both being preferably equal, so as to keep the coil well balanced. The washer and ring should be connected to the terminals by heavily insulated thin wires. It is easy in observing the effect of the capacity to produce a sheet of uniform streams, or a fine network of thin silvery threads, or a mass of loud brilliant sparks, which completely cover the plate.

Early experimenters talked about the display of sparks created by a large induction coil when set up on an insulating plate that separates the terminals. Recently, Siemens conducted some experiments that yielded impressive results, which attracted a lot of interest. It's clear that large coils, even when used with low-frequency currents, can create stunning effects. However, even the largest coil ever made doesn't come close to matching the spectacular streams and sparks generated by a properly adjusted disruptive discharge coil. For example, a coil like the one we're discussing can easily cover a plate with a diameter of one meter with these streams. The best way to conduct these experiments is to take a very thin rubber or glass plate and attach a wide ring of tinfoil to one side. On the other side, place a circular washer that aligns with the ring, ensuring both surfaces are ideally equal to keep the setup balanced. Connect the washer and ring to the terminals using heavily insulated thin wires. It’s easy to observe how the capacity can create a sheet of uniform streams, a delicate network of thin silvery threads, or a burst of bright, loud sparks that completely cover the plate.

Since I have advanced the idea of the conversion by means of the disruptive discharge, in my paper before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers at the beginning of the past year, the interest excited in it has been considerable. It affords us a means for producing any potentials by the aid of inexpensive coils operated from ordinary systems of distribution, and—what is perhaps more appreciated—it enables us to convert currents of[Pg 221] any frequency into currents of any other lower or higher frequency. But its chief value will perhaps be found in the help which it will afford us in the investigations of the phenomena of phosphorescence, which a disruptive discharge coil is capable of exciting in innumerable cases where ordinary coils, even the largest, would utterly fail.

Since I presented the idea of conversion through disruptive discharge in my paper at the American Institute of Electrical Engineers at the start of last year, there's been a lot of interest in it. It gives us a way to generate any voltage using affordable coils that work with regular distribution systems, and—what's likely more appreciated—it allows us to convert currents of[Pg 221] any frequency into currents of any higher or lower frequency. However, its main value may lie in the assistance it provides for exploring the phenomena of phosphorescence, which a disruptive discharge coil can activate in countless situations where even the largest ordinary coils would completely fail.

Considering its probable uses for many practical purposes, and its possible introduction into laboratories for scientific research, a few additional remarks as to the construction of such a coil will perhaps not be found superfluous.

Considering its likely applications for various practical purposes and its potential use in laboratories for scientific research, a few extra comments on the design of such a coil may not be unnecessary.

It is, of course, absolutely necessary to employ in such a coil wires provided with the best insulation.

It is, of course, essential to use wires with the best insulation in such a coil.

Good coils may be produced by employing wires covered with several layers of cotton, boiling the coil a long time in pure wax, and cooling under moderate pressure. The advantage of such a coil is that it can be easily handled, but it cannot probably give as satisfactory results as a coil immersed in pure oil. Besides, it seems that the presence of a large body of wax affects the coil disadvantageously, whereas this does not seem to be the case with oil. Perhaps it is because the dielectric losses in the liquid are smaller.

Good coils can be made by using wires that are covered in multiple layers of cotton, boiling the coil for a long time in pure wax, and then cooling it under moderate pressure. The benefit of this type of coil is that it's easy to handle, but it likely won’t perform as well as a coil submerged in pure oil. Additionally, it appears that having a large amount of wax negatively impacts the coil, while this doesn’t seem to happen with oil. Maybe it’s because the dielectric losses in the liquid are lower.

I have tried at first silk and cotton covered wires with oil immersions, but I have been gradually led to use gutta-percha covered wires, which proved most satisfactory. Gutta-percha insulation adds, of course, to the capacity of the coil, and this, especially if the coil be large, is a great disadvantage when extreme frequencies are desired; but, on the other hand, gutta-percha will withstand much more than an equal thickness of oil, and this advantage should be secured at any price. Once the coil has been immersed, it should never be taken out of the oil for more than a few hours, else the gutta-percha will crack up and the coil will not be worth half as much as before. Gutta-percha is probably slowly attacked by the oil, but after an immersion of eight to nine months I have found no ill effects.

I first experimented with silk and cotton-covered wires soaked in oil, but eventually I switched to gutta-percha covered wires, which turned out to be the most effective. Gutta-percha insulation does increase the coil's capacity, which can be a significant drawback when you're aiming for high frequencies, especially with larger coils. However, gutta-percha can endure much more than an equal thickness of oil, and that benefit is worth any cost. Once the coil is submerged, it should never be removed from the oil for more than a few hours; otherwise, the gutta-percha can crack, making the coil worth far less than it was. While gutta-percha may be slowly damaged by the oil, after immersing it for eight to nine months, I haven't noticed any negative effects.

I have obtained two kinds of gutta-percha wire known in commerce: in one the insulation sticks tightly to the metal, in the other it does not. Unless a special method is followed to expel all air, it is much safer to use the first kind. I wind the coil within an oil tank so that all interstices are filled up with the oil. Between the layers I use cloth boiled out thoroughly in oil, calculating the thickness according to the difference of potential[Pg 222] between the turns. There seems not to be a very great difference whatever kind of oil is used; I use paraffine or linseed oil.

I have acquired two types of gutta-percha wire available in the market: one where the insulation adheres tightly to the metal, and the other where it does not. Unless a special technique is used to remove all air, it's much safer to go with the first type. I wind the coil inside an oil tank to ensure that all gaps are filled with oil. Between the layers, I use cloth that's been thoroughly boiled in oil, adjusting the thickness based on the difference in potential between the turns. There doesn't seem to be a significant difference regardless of the type of oil used; I typically opt for paraffin or linseed oil.[Pg 222]

To exclude more perfectly the air, an excellent way to proceed, and easily practicable with small coils, is the following: Construct a box of hardwood of very thick boards which have been for a long time boiled in oil. The boards should be so joined as to safely withstand the external air pressure. The coil being placed and fastened in position within the box, the latter is closed with a strong lid, and covered with closely fitting metal sheets, the joints of which are soldered very carefully. On the top two small holes are drilled, passing through the metal sheet and the wood, and in these holes two small glass tubes are inserted and the joints made air-tight. One of the tubes is connected to a vacuum pump, and the other with a vessel containing a sufficient quantity of boiled-out oil. The latter tube has a very small hole at the bottom, and is provided with a stopcock. When a fairly good vacuum has been obtained, the stopcock is opened and the oil slowly fed in. Proceeding in this manner, it is impossible that any big bubbles, which are the principal danger, should remain between the turns. The air is most completely excluded, probably better than by boiling out, which, however, when gutta-percha coated wires are used, is not practicable.

To more effectively get rid of the air, a great method that's easy to implement with small coils is as follows: Build a box out of hardwood with very thick boards that have been boiled in oil for a long time. The boards should be joined securely to withstand outside air pressure. Once the coil is placed and secured inside the box, close it with a strong lid and cover it with tightly fitting metal sheets, making sure to carefully solder the joints. On the top, drill two small holes that go through both the metal sheet and the wood, and insert two small glass tubes into these holes, sealing them to be airtight. One tube connects to a vacuum pump, while the other connects to a container with enough boiled-out oil. The second tube should have a very small hole at the bottom and be fitted with a stopcock. Once a good vacuum is achieved, open the stopcock to slowly introduce the oil. By following this method, it is impossible for any large bubbles, which pose the main risk, to remain between the coils. The air is completely eliminated, probably even better than boiling out, which, however, isn't feasible when using gutta-percha coated wires.

For the primaries I use ordinary line wire with a thick cotton coating. Strands of very thin insulated wires properly interlaced would, of course, be the best to employ for the primaries, but they are not to be had.

For the primaries, I use regular line wire with a thick cotton coating. Strands of very thin insulated wires woven together would definitely be the best option for the primaries, but they aren't available.

In an experimental coil the size of the wires is not of great importance. In the coil here used the primary is No. 12 and the secondary No. 24 Brown & Sharpe gauge wire; but the sections may be varied considerably. It would only imply different adjustments; the results aimed at would not be materially affected.

In an experimental coil, the size of the wires isn't that important. In the coil used here, the primary is No. 12 and the secondary is No. 24 Brown & Sharpe gauge wire; however, the sections can be changed quite a bit. This would just require different adjustments; the intended results wouldn't be significantly impacted.

I have dwelt at some length upon the various forms of brush discharge because, in studying them, we not only observe phenomena which please our eye, but also afford us food for thought, and lead us to conclusions of practical importance. In the use of alternating currents of very high tension, too much precaution cannot be taken to prevent the brush discharge. In a main conveying such currents, in an induction coil or transformer, or in a condenser, the brush discharge is a source of great danger to the insulation. In a condenser, especially, the gaseous matter must[Pg 223] be most carefully expelled, for in it the charged surfaces are near each other, and if the potentials are high, just as sure as a weight will fall if let go, so the insulation will give way if a single gaseous bubble of some size be present, whereas, if all gaseous matter were carefully excluded, the condenser would safely withstand a much higher difference of potential. A main conveying alternating currents of very high tension may be injured merely by a blow hole or small crack in the insulation, the more so as a blowhole is apt to contain gas at low pressure; and as it appears almost impossible to completely obviate such little imperfections, I am led to believe that in our future distribution of electrical energy by currents of very high tension, liquid insulation will be used. The cost is a great drawback, but if we employ an oil as an insulator the distribution of electrical energy with something like 100,000 volts, and even more, becomes, at least with higher frequencies, so easy that it could be hardly called an engineering feat. With oil insulation and alternate current motors, transmissions of power can be affected with safety and upon an industrial basis at distances of as much as a thousand miles.

I’ve spent some time discussing the different types of brush discharge because, when we study them, we not only see visually interesting phenomena, but we also find useful insights that lead us to important practical conclusions. When using very high voltage alternating currents, it's crucial to take every precaution to prevent brush discharge. In a system carrying such currents, whether in an induction coil, transformer, or capacitor, brush discharge poses a significant risk to insulation. In a capacitor, especially, it's vital to thoroughly remove any gas, since the charged surfaces are closely positioned, and if the voltage is high, any sizable gas bubble can cause the insulation to fail, just like a dropped weight will fall. However, if all gas is properly removed, the capacitor could handle a much higher voltage difference. A system carrying high voltage alternating currents can be damaged by just a small hole or crack in the insulation, particularly since such holes often contain low-pressure gas. Given that it seems nearly impossible to completely eliminate these small flaws, I suspect that in the future, high voltage electrical energy distribution will rely on liquid insulation. The cost is a significant drawback, but if we use oil as an insulator, distributing electrical energy at around 100,000 volts or even more could be so straightforward, especially at higher frequencies, that it wouldn’t be considered much of an engineering challenge. With oil insulation and alternating current motors, power can be transmitted safely and efficiently over distances of up to a thousand miles.

A peculiar property of oils, and liquid insulation in general, when subjected to rapidly changing electric stresses, is to disperse any gaseous bubbles which may be present, and diffuse them through its mass, generally long before any injurious break can occur. This feature may be easily observed with an ordinary induction coil by taking the primary out, plugging up the end of the tube upon which the secondary is wound, and filling it with some fairly transparent insulator, such as paraffine oil. A primary of a diameter something like six millimetres smaller than the inside of the tube may be inserted in the oil. When the coil is set to work one may see, looking from the top through the oil, many luminous points—air bubbles which are caught by inserting the primary, and which are rendered luminous in consequence of the violent bombardment. The occluded air, by its impact against the oil, heats it; the oil begins to circulate, carrying some of the air along with it, until the bubbles are dispersed and the luminous points disappear. In this manner, unless large bubbles are occluded in such way that circulation is rendered impossible, a damaging break is averted, the only effect being a moderate warming up of the oil. If, instead of the liquid, a solid insulation, no matter how thick, were used, a breaking through and injury of the apparatus would be inevitable.[Pg 224]

A unique characteristic of oils and liquid insulation, in general, is that when they are exposed to rapidly changing electric stresses, they tend to break up any air bubbles that might be present and disperse them throughout the liquid, usually well before any harmful breakage can happen. This can be easily demonstrated with a regular induction coil by removing the primary coil, sealing the end of the tube where the secondary coil is wound, and filling it with a clear insulator like paraffin oil. A primary coil, about six millimeters smaller in diameter than the inside of the tube, can be inserted into the oil. When the coil is activated, you can observe from the top through the oil many bright points—air bubbles that get trapped when inserting the primary and become luminous due to the intense bombardment. The trapped air, upon hitting the oil, heats it up; the oil starts to circulate, moving some of the air along with it, until the bubbles are dispersed and the bright points vanish. In this way, unless large bubbles get trapped in a way that prevents circulation, damaging breakage is avoided, and the only effect is a slight increase in the oil's temperature. If a solid insulator, regardless of thickness, were used instead of the liquid, breaking through and damaging the equipment would be unavoidable.[Pg 224]

The exclusion of gaseous matter from any apparatus in which the dielectric is subjected to more or less rapidly changing electric forces is, however, not only desirable in order to avoid a possible injury of the apparatus, but also on account of economy. In a condenser, for instance, as long as only a solid or only a liquid dielectric is used, the loss is small; but if a gas under ordinary or small pressure be present the loss may be very great. Whatever the nature of the force acting in the dielectric may be, it seems that in a solid or liquid the molecular displacement produced by the force is small: hence the product of force and displacement is insignificant, unless the force be very great; but in a gas the displacement, and therefore this product, is considerable; the molecules are free to move, they reach high speeds, and the energy of their impact is lost in heat or otherwise. If the gas be strongly compressed, the displacement due to the force is made smaller, and the losses are reduced.

The exclusion of gas from any device where the dielectric is exposed to rapidly changing electric forces is not just desirable to prevent potential damage to the device, but it's also cost-effective. For example, in a condenser, as long as only a solid or liquid dielectric is used, the loss is minimal; however, if a gas at normal or low pressure is present, the loss can be significant. No matter what kind of force is acting on the dielectric, it appears that in a solid or liquid, the molecular displacement caused by the force is small. Therefore, the product of force and displacement is insignificant unless the force is very strong. In a gas, however, the displacement and thus this product is substantial. The molecules can move freely, achieving high speeds, and the energy from their collisions is lost as heat or in other ways. If the gas is highly compressed, the displacement from the force is reduced, which lowers the losses.

In most of the succeeding experiments I prefer, chiefly on account of the regular and positive action, to employ the alternator before referred to. This is one of the several machines constructed by me for the purpose of these investigations. It has 384 pole projections, and is capable of giving currents of a frequency of about 10,000 per second. This machine has been illustrated and briefly described in my first paper before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, May 20th, 1891, to which I have already referred. A more detailed description, sufficient to enable any engineer to build a similar machine, will be found in several electrical journals of that period.

In most of the following experiments, I prefer to use the alternator I mentioned earlier, mainly because of its consistent and reliable performance. This is one of several machines I built for these investigations. It has 384 pole projections and can produce currents at a frequency of about 10,000 per second. I illustrated and briefly described this machine in my first paper to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers on May 20, 1891, which I’ve already mentioned. You can find a more detailed description that would allow any engineer to create a similar machine in several electrical journals from that time.

The induction coils operated from the machine are rather small, containing from 5,000 to 15,000 turns in the secondary. They are immersed in boiled-out linseed oil, contained in wooden boxes covered with zinc sheet.

The induction coils powered by the machine are quite small, featuring between 5,000 to 15,000 turns in the secondary. They are submerged in boiled linseed oil, which is kept in wooden boxes that are covered with zinc sheets.

I have found it advantageous to reverse the usual position of the wires, and to wind, in these coils, the primaries on the top; thus allowing the use of a much larger primary, which, of course, reduces the danger of overheating and increases the output of the coil. I make the primary on each side at least one centimetre shorter than the secondary, to prevent the breaking through on the ends, which would surely occur unless the insulation on the top of the secondary be very thick, and this, of course, would be disadvantageous.

I’ve found it helpful to switch the usual arrangement of the wires and to wind the primaries on the top in these coils. This way, I can use a much larger primary, which reduces the risk of overheating and boosts the output of the coil. I make each primary at least one centimeter shorter than the secondary on each side to avoid breakdown at the ends, which would definitely happen unless the insulation on top of the secondary is very thick, and that would be a drawback.

When the primary is made movable, which is necessary in[Pg 225] some experiments, and many times convenient for the purposes of adjustment, I cover the secondary with wax, and turn it off in a lathe to a diameter slightly smaller than the inside of the primary coil. The latter I provide with a handle reaching out of the oil, which serves to shift it in any position along the secondary.

When the primary is made movable, which is necessary in[Pg 225] some experiments and often convenient for adjustment, I cover the secondary with wax and shape it on a lathe to a diameter slightly smaller than the inside of the primary coil. I also add a handle to the primary that extends out of the oil, allowing it to be moved to any position along the secondary.

I will now venture to make, in regard to the general manipulation of induction coils, a few observations bearing upon points which have not been fully appreciated in earlier experiments with such coils, and are even now often overlooked.

I will now attempt to share some observations about the general handling of induction coils, focusing on aspects that haven't been fully understood in previous experiments with these coils and are still often ignored today.

The secondary of the coil possesses usually such a high self-induction that the current through the wire is inappreciable, and may be so even when the terminals are joined by a conductor of small resistance. If capacity is added to the terminals, the self-induction is counteracted, and a stronger current is made to flow through the secondary, though its terminals are insulated from each other. To one entirely unacquainted with the properties of alternating currents nothing will look more puzzling. This feature was illustrated in the experiment performed at the beginning with the top plates of wire gauze attached to the terminals and the rubber plate. When the plates of wire gauze were close together, and a small arc passed between them, the arc prevented a strong current from passing through the secondary, because it did away with the capacity on the terminals; when the rubber plate was inserted between, the capacity of the condenser formed counteracted the self-induction of the secondary, a stronger current passed now, the coil performed more work, and the discharge was by far more powerful.

The secondary of the coil typically has such a high self-induction that the current flowing through the wire is negligible, and this can happen even when the terminals are connected by a low-resistance conductor. If you add capacity to the terminals, it counteracts the self-induction, allowing a stronger current to flow through the secondary, even though its terminals are insulated from each other. To someone who is completely unfamiliar with the properties of alternating currents, this can seem very confusing. This point was demonstrated in the experiment conducted at the beginning with the top plates of wire gauze connected to the terminals and the rubber plate. When the wire gauze plates were positioned close together, and a small arc formed between them, the arc prevented a strong current from flowing through the secondary because it eliminated the capacity at the terminals. However, when the rubber plate was placed between them, the capacity created by the condenser counteracted the self-induction of the secondary, resulting in a stronger current, the coil did more work, and the discharge was significantly more powerful.

The first thing, then, in operating the induction coil is to combine capacity with the secondary to overcome the self-induction. If the frequencies and potentials are very high, gaseous matter should be carefully kept away from the charged surfaces. If Leyden jars are used, they should be immersed in oil, as otherwise considerable dissipation may occur if the jars are greatly strained. When high frequencies are used, it is of equal importance to combine a condenser with the primary. One may use a condenser connected to the ends of the primary or to the terminals of the alternator, but the latter is not to be recommended, as the machine might be injured. The best way is undoubtedly to use the condenser in series with the primary and with the alternator, and to adjust its capacity so as to annul the[Pg 226] self-induction of both the latter. The condenser should be adjustable by very small steps, and for a finer adjustment a small oil condenser with movable plates may be used conveniently.

The first thing to do when using the induction coil is to combine capacity with the secondary to overcome self-induction. If the frequencies and potentials are very high, keep gaseous substances away from the charged surfaces. If Leyden jars are involved, they should be submerged in oil; otherwise, significant energy loss may happen if the jars are heavily stressed. When using high frequencies, it's also crucial to pair a condenser with the primary. You can connect a condenser to the ends of the primary or to the alternator terminals, but the latter isn't advisable, as it could damage the machine. The best method is definitely to use the condenser in series with both the primary and the alternator, adjusting its capacity to cancel out the[Pg 226] self-induction of both. The condenser should be adjustable in very small increments, and for finer adjustments, a small oil condenser with movable plates is convenient to use.

I think it best at this juncture to bring before you a phenomenon, observed by me some time ago, which to the purely scientific investigator may perhaps appear more interesting than any of the results which I have the privilege to present to you this evening.

I believe it's best right now to present a phenomenon I observed some time ago, which may seem more fascinating to a purely scientific investigator than any of the results I'm sharing with you this evening.

It may be quite properly ranked among the brush phenomena—in fact, it is a brush, formed at, or near, a single terminal in high vacuum.

It can be accurately classified as one of the brush phenomena—in fact, it's a brush, created at or near a single terminal in a high vacuum.

Fig. 141, 142.
Fig. 141.Fig. 142.

In bulbs provided with a conducting terminal, though it be of aluminum, the brush has but an ephemeral existence, and cannot, unfortunately, be indefinitely preserved in its most sensitive state, even in a bulb devoid of any conducting electrode. In studying the phenomenon, by all means a bulb having no leading-in wire should be used. I have found it best to use bulbs constructed as indicated in Figs. 141 and 142.

In bulbs with a conducting terminal, even if it’s made of aluminum, the brush only lasts a short time and, unfortunately, can't be kept in its most sensitive state indefinitely, even in a bulb without any conducting electrode. When examining this phenomenon, it's best to use a bulb that doesn't have a leading-in wire. I’ve found that bulbs built as shown in Figs. 141 and 142 work best.

In Fig. 141 the bulb comprises an incandescent lamp globe L, in the neck of which is sealed a barometer tube b, the end of which is blown out to form a small sphere s. This sphere should be sealed as closely as possible in the centre of the large globe. Before sealing, a thin tube t, of aluminum sheet, may be slipped in the barometer tube, but it is not important to employ it.[Pg 227]

In Fig. 141, the bulb consists of an incandescent lamp globe L, with a barometer tube b sealed in the neck. The end of the tube is blown out to create a small sphere s. This sphere should be sealed as tightly as possible at the center of the large globe. Before sealing, a thin tube t made of aluminum sheet can be inserted into the barometer tube, but using it isn't essential.[Pg 227]

The small hollow sphere s is filled with some conducting powder, and a wire w is cemented in the neck for the purpose of connecting the conducting powder with the generator.

The small hollow sphere s is filled with some conductive powder, and a wire w is fixed in the neck to connect the conductive powder with the generator.

The construction shown in Fig. 142 was chosen in order to remove from the brush any conducting body which might possibly affect it. The bulb consists in this case of a lamp globe L, which has a neck n, provided with a tube b and small sphere s, sealed to it, so that two entirely independent compartments are formed, as indicated in the drawing. When the bulb is in use the neck n is provided with a tinfoil coating, which is connected to the generator and acts inductively upon the moderately rarefied and highly conducted gas inclosed in the neck. From there the current passes through the tube b into the small sphere s, to act by induction upon the gas contained in the globe L.

The construction shown in Fig. 142 was chosen to eliminate any conductive materials from the brush that could potentially interfere with it. In this case, the bulb consists of a lamp globe L with a neck n, which has a tube b and a small sphere s sealed to it, creating two completely separate compartments, as depicted in the drawing. When the bulb is in use, the neck n is covered with a tinfoil coating, which is connected to the generator and inductively influences the moderately rarefied and highly conductive gas enclosed in the neck. From there, the current flows through the tube b into the small sphere s, where it acts by induction on the gas inside the globe L.

It is of advantage to make the tube t very thick, the hole through it very small, and to blow the sphere s very thin. It is of the greatest importance that the sphere s be placed in the centre of the globe L.

It’s beneficial to make the tube t quite thick, the hole in it very small, and to blow the sphere s really thin. It’s crucial that the sphere s is positioned in the center of the globe L.

Fig. 143. Fig. 143.

Figs. 143, 144 and 145 indicate different forms, or stages, of the brush. Fig. 143 shows the brush as it first appears in a bulb provided with a conducting terminal; but, as in such a bulb it very soon disappears—often after a few minutes—I will confine myself to the description of the phenomenon as seen in a bulb without conducting electrode. It is observed under the following conditions:

Figs. 143, 144, and 145 show different forms or stages of the brush. Fig. 143 depicts the brush as it first appears in a bulb with a conducting terminal; however, since it quickly disappears in such a bulb—often within a few minutes—I will limit my description to the phenomenon as seen in a bulb without a conducting electrode. It is observed under the following conditions:

When the globe L (Figs. 141 and 142) is exhausted to a very high degree, generally the bulb is not excited upon connecting the wire w (Fig. 141) or the tinfoil coating of the bulb (Fig.[Pg 228] 142) to the terminal of the induction coil. To excite it, it is usually sufficient to grasp the globe L with the hand. An intense phosphorescence then spreads at first over the globe, but soon gives place to a white, misty light. Shortly afterward one may notice that the luminosity is unevenly distributed in the globe, and after passing the current for some time the bulb appears as in Fig. 144. From this stage the phenomenon will gradually pass to that indicated in Fig. 145, after some minutes, hours, days or weeks, according as the bulb is worked. Warming the bulb or increasing the potential hastens the transit.

When the globe L (Figs. 141 and 142) is drained almost completely, the bulb usually doesn't light up when you connect the wire w (Fig. 141) or the tinfoil coating of the bulb (Fig.[Pg 228] 142) to the induction coil's terminal. To get it to light, you typically just need to hold the globe L in your hand. An intense phosphorescence will initially spread across the globe, but soon it will change to a white, misty light. After a while, you'll notice that the brightness is distributed unevenly in the globe, and after running the current for some time, the bulb looks like in Fig. 144. From this point, the phenomenon will gradually transition to what is shown in Fig. 145, depending on whether the bulb is used for minutes, hours, days, or weeks. Warming the bulb or increasing the voltage speeds up this process.

Fig. 144, 145.
Fig. 144.Fig. 145.

When the brush assumes the form indicated in Fig. 145, it may be brought to a state of extreme sensitiveness to electrostatic and magnetic influence. The bulb hanging straight down from a wire, and all objects being remote from it, the approach of the observer at a few paces from the bulb will cause the brush to fly to the opposite side, and if he walks around the bulb it will always keep on the opposite side. It may begin to spin around the terminal long before it reaches that sensitive stage. When it begins to turn around, principally, but also before, it is affected by a magnet, and at a certain stage it is susceptible to magnetic influence to an astonishing degree. A small permanent magnet, with its poles at a distance of no more than two centimetres, will affect it visibly at a distance of two metres, slowing down or accelerating the rotation according to how it is held relatively to[Pg 229] the brush. I think I have observed that at the stage when it is most sensitive to magnetic, it is not most sensitive to electrostatic, influence. My explanation is, that the electrostatic attraction between the brush and the glass of the bulb, which retards the rotation, grows much quicker than the magnetic influence when the intensity of the stream is increased.

When the brush takes the shape shown in Fig. 145, it can become extremely sensitive to electrostatic and magnetic effects. With the bulb hanging straight down from a wire and everything else being far away, if an observer approaches within a few steps of the bulb, the brush will move to the opposite side. If the observer walks around the bulb, the brush will always stay on the opposite side. It may start to spin around the terminal even before it reaches that sensitive point. As it begins to turn, and especially when it does, it gets influenced by a magnet, and at a certain point, it becomes surprisingly responsive to magnetic effects. A small permanent magnet, with its poles no more than two centimeters apart, can visibly affect it from a distance of two meters, either slowing down or speeding up the rotation depending on how it is positioned relative to[Pg 229] the brush. I believe I've noticed that at the point when it is most sensitive to magnetic effects, it is not at its peak sensitivity to electrostatic effects. My reasoning is that the electrostatic attraction between the brush and the glass of the bulb, which slows down the rotation, increases much more quickly than the magnetic influence when the stream's intensity goes up.

When the bulb hangs with the globe L down, the rotation is always clockwise. In the southern hemisphere it would occur in the opposite direction and on the equator the brush should not turn at all. The rotation may be reversed by a magnet kept at some distance. The brush rotates best, seemingly, when it is at right angles to the lines of force of the earth. It very likely rotates, when at its maximum speed, in synchronism with the alternations, say, 10,000 times a second. The rotation can be slowed down or accelerated by the approach or receding of the observer, or any conducting body, but it cannot be reversed by putting the bulb in any position. When it is in the state of the highest sensitiveness and the potential or frequency be varied, the sensitiveness is rapidly diminished. Changing either of these but little will generally stop the rotation. The sensitiveness is likewise affected by the variations of temperature. To attain great sensitiveness it is necessary to have the small sphere s in the centre of the globe L, as otherwise the electrostatic action of the glass of the globe will tend to stop the rotation. The sphere s should be small and of uniform thickness; any dissymmetry of course has the effect to diminish the sensitiveness.

When the bulb is hanging with the globe L facing down, the rotation always goes clockwise. In the southern hemisphere, it would spin in the opposite direction, and at the equator, the brush shouldn't turn at all. A magnet held at a distance can reverse the rotation. The brush seems to rotate best when it’s at a right angle to the Earth’s magnetic field lines. It likely spins at its maximum speed in sync with alternate changes, around 10,000 times a second. The rotation can be slowed down or sped up by the movement of the observer or any conducting object, but you can’t reverse it just by changing the bulb's position. When it’s at its most sensitive state and the potential or frequency changes, its sensitivity quickly decreases. Even small changes in either can typically stop the rotation. Sensitivity is also influenced by temperature variations. To achieve high sensitivity, the small sphere s should be placed at the center of the globe L; otherwise, the electrostatic effect of the globe's glass will hinder the rotation. The sphere s needs to be small and evenly thick; any asymmetry will reduce its sensitivity.

The fact that the brush rotates in a definite direction in a permanent magnetic field seems to show that in alternating currents of very high frequency the positive and negative impulses are not equal, but that one always preponderates over the other.

The fact that the brush rotates in a specific direction in a permanent magnetic field suggests that in alternating currents of very high frequency, the positive and negative impulses aren't equal, but one always dominates the other.

Of course, this rotation in one direction may be due to the action of the two elements of the same current upon each other, or to the action of the field produced by one of the elements upon the other, as in a series motor, without necessarily one impulse being stronger than the other. The fact that the brush turns, as far as I could observe, in any position, would speak for this view. In such case it would turn at any point of the earth's surface. But, on the other hand, it is then hard to explain why a permanent magnet should reverse the rotation, and one must assume the preponderance of impulses of one kind.

Of course, this rotation in one direction could be caused by the interaction of the two elements of the same current with each other, or by the influence of the field created by one element on the other, like in a series motor, without necessarily one force being stronger than the other. The fact that the brush turns, as far as I can tell, in any position supports this idea. In that case, it would rotate at any point on the Earth's surface. However, it's also difficult to understand why a permanent magnet would reverse the rotation, so we must assume that one type of force is stronger.

As to the causes of the formation of the brush or stream, I[Pg 230] think it is due to the electrostatic action of the globe and the dissymmetry of the parts. If the small bulb s and the globe L were perfect concentric spheres, and the glass throughout of the same thickness and quality, I think the brush would not form, as the tendency to pass would be equal on all sides. That the formation of the stream is due to an irregularity is apparent from the fact that it has the tendency to remain in one position, and rotation occurs most generally only when it is brought out of this position by electrostatic or magnetic influence. When in an extremely sensitive state it rests in one position, most curious experiments may be performed with it. For instance, the experimenter may, by selecting a proper position, approach the hand at a certain considerable distance to the bulb, and he may cause the brush to pass off by merely stiffening the muscles of the arm. When it begins to rotate slowly, and the hands are held at a proper distance, it is impossible to make even the slightest motion without producing a visible effect upon the brush. A metal plate connected to the other terminal of the coil affects it at a great distance, slowing down the rotation often to one turn a second.

As for the reasons behind the formation of the brush or stream, I think it comes from the electrostatic interaction of the globe and the unevenness of its parts. If the small bulb s and the globe L were perfectly concentric spheres, and if the glass had the same thickness and quality throughout, I believe the brush wouldn't form, since the tendency to pass through would be equal on all sides. The fact that the stream forms due to some irregularity is clear because it tends to stay in one position, and rotation usually only happens when it's disturbed by electrostatic or magnetic forces. When in a very sensitive state, it remains in one spot, allowing for some fascinating experiments. For example, the experimenter can approach the hand from a considerable distance to the bulb and cause the brush to discharge simply by tensing their arm muscles. Once it starts to rotate slowly, holding hands at the right distance makes it impossible to move even slightly without visibly affecting the brush. A metal plate connected to the other terminal of the coil influences it from a great distance, often reducing the rotation speed to just one turn per second.

I am firmly convinced that such a brush, when we learn how to produce it properly, will prove a valuable aid in the investigation of the nature of the forces acting in an electrostatic or magnetic field. If there is any motion which is measurable going on in the space, such a brush ought to reveal it. It is, so to speak, a beam of light, frictionless, devoid of inertia.

I am firmly convinced that when we learn how to create such a brush properly, it will be a valuable tool in understanding the forces at play in an electrostatic or magnetic field. If there’s any measurable motion happening in the space, this brush should reveal it. It’s like a beam of light—frictionless and without inertia.

I think that it may find practical applications in telegraphy. With such a brush it would be possible to send dispatches across the Atlantic, for instance, with any speed, since its sensitiveness may be so great that the slightest changes will affect it. If it were possible to make the stream more intense and very narrow, its deflections could be easily photographed.

I believe it could be useful in telegraphy. With this kind of technology, we could send messages across the Atlantic very quickly because it's so sensitive that even the tiniest changes would make a difference. If we could make the stream more intense and narrower, it would be simple to capture its deflections on camera.

I have been interested to find whether there is a rotation of the stream itself, or whether there is simply a stress traveling around the bulb. For this purpose I mounted a light mica fan so that its vanes were in the path of the brush. If the stream itself was rotating the fan would be spun around. I could produce no distinct rotation of the fan, although I tried the experiment repeatedly; but as the fan exerted a noticeable influence on the stream, and the apparent rotation of the latter was, in this case, never quite satisfactory, the experiment did not appear to be conclusive.[Pg 231]

I have been curious to see if the stream itself is rotating or if there's just a stress moving around the bulb. To check this, I set up a light mica fan so that its blades were in the path of the brush. If the stream was rotating, the fan would spin. I couldn't get the fan to rotate distinctly, even after trying the experiment multiple times; however, since the fan had a noticeable effect on the stream, and the apparent rotation of the stream was never quite convincing, the experiment didn't seem conclusive.[Pg 231]

I have been unable to produce the phenomenon with the disruptive discharge coil, although every other of these phenomena can be well produced by it—many, in fact, much better than with coils operated from an alternator.

I haven't been able to generate the phenomenon using the disruptive discharge coil, even though it can produce all the other phenomena quite well—many, in fact, much better than coils powered by an alternator.

It may be possible to produce the brush by impulses of one direction, or even by a steady potential, in which case it would be still more sensitive to magnetic influence.

It might be possible to create the brush using impulses in one direction or even with a constant voltage, which would make it even more responsive to magnetic influence.

In operating an induction coil with rapidly alternating currents, we realize with astonishment, for the first time, the great importance of the relation of capacity, self-induction and frequency as regards the general results. The effects of capacity are the most striking, for in these experiments, since the self-induction and frequency both are high, the critical capacity is very small, and need be but slightly varied to produce a very considerable change. The experimenter may bring his body in contact with the terminals of the secondary of the coil, or attach to one or both terminals insulated bodies of very small bulk, such as bulbs, and he may produce a considerable rise or fall of potential, and greatly affect the flow of the current through the primary. In the experiment before shown, in which a brush appears at a wire attached to one terminal, and the wire is vibrated when the experimenter brings his insulated body in contact with the other terminal of the coil, the sudden rise of potential was made evident.

In using an induction coil with rapidly alternating currents, we are amazed, for the first time, by the significant importance of the relationship between capacity, self-induction, and frequency concerning the overall results. The effects of capacity are the most notable; in these experiments, since both self-induction and frequency are high, the critical capacity is very small and only needs to be slightly adjusted to produce a substantial change. The experimenter can touch the terminals of the secondary of the coil or connect small insulated objects, like bulbs, to one or both terminals, which can create a significant increase or decrease in potential and greatly influence the current flow through the primary. In the previously demonstrated experiment, a brush appears at a wire connected to one terminal, and when the experimenter touches the other terminal of the coil with their insulated body, the sudden rise in potential becomes evident.

I may show you the behavior of the coil in another manner which possesses a feature of some interest. I have here a little light fan of aluminum sheet, fastened to a needle and arranged to rotate freely in a metal piece screwed to one of the terminals of the coil. When the coil is set to work, the molecules of the air are rhythmically attracted and repelled. As the force with which they are repelled is greater than that with which they are attracted, it results that there is a repulsion exerted on the surfaces of the fan. If the fan were made simply of a metal sheet, the repulsion would be equal on the opposite sides, and would produce no effect. But if one of the opposing surfaces is screened, or if, generally speaking, the bombardment on this side is weakened in some way or other, there remains the repulsion exerted upon the other, and the fan is set in rotation. The screening is best effected by fastening upon one of the opposing sides of the fan insulated conducting coatings, or, if the fan is made in the shape of an ordinary propeller screw, by fastening on one[Pg 232] side, and close to it, an insulated metal plate. The static screen may, however, be omitted, and simply a thickness of insulating material fastened to one of the sides of the fan.

I can show you how the coil works in another way that has an interesting feature. Here, I have a small aluminum fan attached to a needle, which is set up to spin freely in a metal piece connected to one of the terminals of the coil. When the coil is activated, the air molecules are rhythmically pushed and pulled. Because the force pushing them away is stronger than the force pulling them in, there’s a repulsion felt on the fan's surfaces. If the fan were just made of a metal sheet, the repulsion would be the same on both sides and would have no effect. But if one side is shielded or if the impact on that side is reduced in some way, the repulsion on the other side remains, causing the fan to spin. The shielding works best by attaching insulated conducting coatings to one of the fan’s opposing sides, or if the fan has the shape of a regular propeller, by attaching an insulated metal plate close to one side. However, you can skip the static screen and just attach a layer of insulating material to one side of the fan.

To show the behavior of the coil, the fan may be placed upon the terminal and it will readily rotate when the coil is operated by currents of very high frequency. With a steady potential, of course, and even with alternating currents of very low frequency, it would not turn, because of the very slow exchange of air and, consequently, smaller bombardment; but in the latter case it might turn if the potential were excessive. With a pin wheel, quite the opposite rule holds good; it rotates best with a steady potential, and the effort is the smaller the higher the frequency. Now, it is very easy to adjust the conditions so that the potential is normally not sufficient to turn the fan, but that by connecting the other terminal of the coil with an insulated body it rises to a much greater value, so as to rotate the fan, and it is likewise possible to stop the rotation by connecting to the terminal a body of different size, thereby diminishing the potential.

To demonstrate how the coil works, you can place a fan on the terminal, and it will easily spin when the coil is powered by very high-frequency currents. With a constant voltage, and even with very low-frequency alternating currents, it won’t turn because the air exchange is too slow, leading to less impact; however, in that case, it might spin if the voltage is very high. For a pinwheel, the opposite is true; it spins best with a steady voltage, and the required effort decreases as the frequency increases. It’s straightforward to set things up so that the voltage is usually not enough to turn the fan, but by connecting the other terminal of the coil to an insulated object, the voltage increases significantly, allowing the fan to rotate. It's also possible to stop the rotation by connecting a different sized object to the terminal, which reduces the voltage.

Instead of using the fan in this experiment, we may use the "electric" radiometer with similar effect. But in this case it will be found that the vanes will rotate only at high exhaustion or at ordinary pressures; they will not rotate at moderate pressures, when the air is highly conducting. This curious observation was made conjointly by Professor Crookes and myself. I attribute the result to the high conductivity of the air, the molecules of which then do not act as independent carriers of electric charges, but act all together as a single conducting body. In such case, of course, if there is any repulsion at all of the molecules from the vanes, it must be very small. It is possible, however, that the result is in part due to the fact that the greater part of the discharge passes from the leading-in wire through the highly conducting gas, instead of passing off from the conducting vanes.

Instead of using the fan in this experiment, we can use the "electric" radiometer with a similar effect. However, in this case, we’ll find that the vanes only rotate under high vacuum or at normal pressures; they won’t rotate at moderate pressures, when the air is highly conductive. This interesting observation was made together by Professor Crookes and me. I believe the result is due to the high conductivity of the air, where the molecules no longer act as independent carriers of electric charges, but instead work together as a single conductive entity. In such a case, if there is any repulsion from the molecules against the vanes, it must be very minimal. However, it’s also possible that the result is partly due to most of the discharge passing from the leading-in wire through the highly conductive gas, instead of from the conductive vanes.

In trying the preceding experiment with the electric radiometer the potential should not exceed a certain limit, as then the electrostatic attraction between the vanes and the glass of the bulb may be so great as to stop the rotation.

In conducting the previous experiment with the electric radiometer, the voltage shouldn't go beyond a certain limit, as the electrostatic attraction between the vanes and the glass of the bulb could become so strong that it stops the rotation.

A most curious feature of alternate currents of high frequencies and potentials is that they enable us to perform many experiments by the use of one wire only. In many respects this feature is of great interest.[Pg 233]

A very interesting aspect of high-frequency and high-voltage alternating currents is that they allow us to conduct several experiments using just one wire. This characteristic is quite significant in many ways.[Pg 233]

In a type of alternate current motor invented by me some years ago I produced rotation by inducing, by means of a single alternating current passed through a motor circuit, in the mass or other circuits of the motor, secondary currents, which, jointly with the primary or inducing current, created a moving field of force. A simple but crude form of such a motor is obtained by winding upon an iron core a primary, and close to it a secondary coil, joining the ends of the latter and placing a freely movable metal disc within the influence of the field produced by both. The iron core is employed for obvious reasons, but it is not essential to the operation. To improve the motor, the iron core is made to encircle the armature. Again to improve, the secondary coil is made to partly overlap the primary, so that it cannot free itself from a strong inductive action of the latter, repel its lines as it may. Once more to improve, the proper difference of phase is obtained between the primary and secondary currents by a condenser, self-induction, resistance or equivalent windings.

In a type of alternating current motor I invented a few years ago, I created rotation by inducing secondary currents in the motor’s mass or other circuits through a single alternating current sent through a motor circuit. These secondary currents, combined with the primary or inducing current, formed a moving magnetic field. A basic but rough version of this motor can be made by winding a primary coil around an iron core and placing a secondary coil nearby. The ends of the secondary coil are joined, and a freely movable metal disc is positioned within the field generated by both coils. The iron core is used for clear reasons, although it isn't crucial for the operation. To enhance the motor, the iron core is designed to surround the armature. Additionally, to improve functionality, the secondary coil is made to partially overlap the primary coil, ensuring it remains under the strong inductive influence of the primary coil, regardless of how much they repel each other. Further enhancements are achieved by creating the right phase difference between the primary and secondary currents using a capacitor, self-induction, resistance, or similar windings.

I had discovered, however, that rotation is produced by means of a single coil and core; my explanation of the phenomenon, and leading thought in trying the experiment, being that there must be a true time lag in the magnetization of the core. I remember the pleasure I had when, in the writings of Professor Ayrton, which came later to my hand, I found the idea of the time lag advocated. Whether there is a true time lag, or whether the retardation is due to eddy currents circulating in minute paths, must remain an open question, but the fact is that a coil wound upon an iron core and traversed by an alternating current creates a moving field of force, capable of setting an armature in rotation. It is of some interest, in conjunction with the historical Arago experiment, to mention that in lag or phase motors I have produced rotation in the opposite direction to the moving field, which means that in that experiment the magnet may not rotate, or may even rotate in the opposite direction to the moving disc. Here, then, is a motor (diagrammatically illustrated in Fig. 146), comprising a coil and iron core, and a freely movable copper disc in proximity to the latter.

I found out that rotation is created using just a single coil and core. My reasoning for this experiment was based on the idea that there must be a real time lag in the magnetization of the core. I remember feeling pleased when I later read Professor Ayrton's writings and saw that he supported the idea of time lag. Whether this time lag is real or if the delay is caused by small eddy currents is still open for debate. However, the important point is that a coil wrapped around an iron core and powered by an alternating current generates a moving magnetic field that can cause an armature to spin. It's interesting, especially when considering the historical Arago experiment, to note that in lag or phase motors, I’ve made the rotation happen in the opposite direction of the moving field. This means that, in that experiment, the magnet might not rotate at all, or could even rotate in the opposite direction of the moving disc. So, here’s a motor (illustrated in Fig. 146) that consists of a coil and iron core, along with a freely spinning copper disc nearby.

Fig. 146. Fig. 146.

To demonstrate a novel and interesting feature, I have, for a reason which I will explain, selected this type of motor. When the ends of the coil are connected to the terminals of an alternator the disc is set in rotation. But it is not this experiment, now well known, which I desire to perform. What I wish to [Pg 234]show you is that this motor rotates with one single connection between it and the generator; that is to say, one terminal of the motor is connected to one terminal of the generator—in this case the secondary of a high-tension induction coil—the other terminals of motor and generator being insulated in space. To produce rotation it is generally (but not absolutely) necessary to connect the free end of the motor coil to an insulated body of some size. The experimenter's body is more than sufficient. If he touches the free terminal with an object held in the hand, a current passes through the coil and the copper disc is set in rotation. If an exhausted tube is put in series with the coil, the tube lights brilliantly, showing the passage of a strong current. Instead of the experimenter's body, a small metal sheet suspended on a cord may be used with the same result. In this case the plate acts as a condenser in series with the coil. It counteracts the self-induction of the latter and allows a strong current to pass. In such a combination, the greater the self-induction of the coil the smaller need be the plate, and this means that a lower frequency, or eventually a lower potential, is required to operate the motor. A single coil wound upon a core has a high self-induction; for this reason, principally, this type of motor was chosen to perform the experiment. Were a secondary closed coil wound upon the core, it would tend to diminish the self-[Pg 235]induction, and then it would be necessary to employ a much higher frequency and potential. Neither would be advisable, for a higher potential would endanger the insulation of the small primary coil, and a higher frequency would result in a materially diminished torque.

To show a new and interesting feature, I've chosen this type of motor for a reason I will explain. When the ends of the coil are connected to the terminals of an alternator, the disc starts to spin. However, it's not this well-known experiment that I want to demonstrate. What I want to show you is that this motor spins with just one connection to the generator; specifically, one terminal of the motor is connected to one terminal of the generator—in this case, the secondary of a high-tension induction coil—while the other terminals of both the motor and generator are insulated. To create rotation, it's generally (but not absolutely) necessary to connect the free end of the motor coil to a sufficiently large insulated body. The experimenter's body works perfectly for this. If they touch the free terminal with something held in their hand, a current flows through the coil, causing the copper disc to rotate. If an exhausted tube is placed in series with the coil, it lights up brilliantly, indicating a strong current is flowing. Instead of the experimenter's body, a small metal sheet hanging from a cord can be used with the same effect. In this instance, the plate acts as a condenser in series with the coil. It counteracts the coil's self-induction and allows a strong current to pass. In such a setup, the greater the coil's self-induction, the smaller the plate can be, which means a lower frequency or lower potential is needed to operate the motor. A single coil wound around a core has high self-induction; that's the main reason why this type of motor was selected for the experiment. If there were a secondary closed coil wound around the core, it would reduce the self-induction, and that would require a much higher frequency and potential. Neither would be ideal, as a higher potential could compromise the insulation of the small primary coil, and a higher frequency would significantly reduce torque.

It should be remarked that when such a motor with a closed secondary is used, it is not at all easy to obtain rotation with excessive frequencies, as the secondary cuts off almost completely the lines of the primary—and this, of course, the more, the higher the frequency—and allows the passage of but a minute current. In such a case, unless the secondary is closed through a condenser, it is almost essential, in order to produce rotation, to make the primary and secondary coils overlap each other more or less.

It should be noted that when using a motor with a closed secondary, achieving rotation at high frequencies is quite difficult. The secondary almost completely blocks the lines from the primary, which becomes more pronounced as the frequency increases, allowing only a very small current to pass through. In this situation, unless the secondary is connected through a capacitor, it's almost essential to have some overlap between the primary and secondary coils to generate rotation.

But there is an additional feature of interest about this motor, namely, it is not necessary to have even a single connection between the motor and generator, except, perhaps, through the ground; for not only is an insulated plate capable of giving off energy into space, but it is likewise capable of deriving it from an alternating electrostatic field, though in the latter case the available energy is much smaller. In this instance one of the motor terminals is connected to the insulated plate or body located within the alternating electrostatic field, and the other terminal preferably to the ground.

But there's another interesting aspect of this motor: there's no need for a direct connection between the motor and generator, except maybe through the ground. An insulated plate can release energy into space and can also absorb energy from an alternating electrostatic field, although the latter yields much less energy. In this case, one of the motor terminals is connected to the insulated plate or body situated within the alternating electrostatic field, while the other terminal is ideally connected to the ground.

It is quite possible, however, that such "no wire" motors, as they might be called, could be operated by conduction through the rarefied air at considerable distances. Alternate currents, especially of high frequencies, pass with astonishing freedom through even slightly rarefied gases. The upper strata of the air are rarefied. To reach a number of miles out into space requires the overcoming of difficulties of a merely mechanical nature. There is no doubt that with the enormous potentials obtainable by the use of high frequencies and oil insulation, luminous discharges might be passed through many miles of rarefied air, and that, by thus directing the energy of many hundreds or thousands of horse-power, motors or lamps might be operated at considerable distances from stationary sources. But such schemes are mentioned merely as possibilities. We shall have no need to transmit power in this way. We shall have no need to transmit power at all. Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is[Pg 236] not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic—and this we know it is, for certain—then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature. Of all, living or dead, Crookes came nearest to doing it. His radiometer will turn in the light of day and in the darkness of the night; it will turn everywhere where there is heat, and heat is everywhere. But, unfortunately, this beautiful little machine, while it goes down to posterity as the most interesting, must likewise be put on record as the most inefficient machine ever invented!

It’s quite possible, though, that these "no wire" motors, as we might call them, could be powered by conduction through the thin air over long distances. Alternating currents, especially at high frequencies, can move incredibly easily through even slightly rarefied gases. The upper layers of the atmosphere are thin. To reach miles into space involves overcoming mainly mechanical challenges. There’s no doubt that with the huge power available from high frequencies and oil insulation, light discharges could travel through many miles of thin air, allowing motors or lamps to operate far from stationary power sources. But these ideas are merely possibilities. We won’t need to transmit power this way. Soon enough, our machinery will run on energy that can be accessed from anywhere in the universe. This concept is[Pg 236] not new. People have been drawn to it for ages, whether by instinct or logic. It’s been expressed in various ways throughout history. We see it in the charming myth of Antheus gaining strength from the earth; we find it among the thoughtful ideas of brilliant mathematicians, and in numerous hints and statements from contemporary thinkers. There is energy throughout space. Is this energy static or kinetic? If it’s static, our hopes are pointless; but if it’s kinetic—and we know it is—then it’s only a matter of time before humans succeed in connecting their machinery to the fundamental workings of nature. Among everyone, living or dead, Crookes came closest to achieving this. His radiometer spins in daylight and nighttime; it turns wherever there is heat, and heat is everywhere. But unfortunately, while this lovely little device is considered one of the most intriguing, it must also be recorded as the most inefficient machine ever created!

The preceding experiment is only one of many equally interesting experiments which may be performed by the use of only one wire with alternations of high potential and frequency. We may connect an insulated line to a source of such currents, we may pass an inappreciable current over the line, and on any point of the same we are able to obtain a heavy current, capable of fusing a thick copper wire. Or we may, by the help of some artifice, decompose a solution in any electrolytic cell by connecting only one pole of the cell to the line or source of energy. Or we may, by attaching to the line, or only bringing into its vicinity, light up an incandescent lamp, an exhausted tube, or a phosphorescent bulb.

The previous experiment is just one of many equally fascinating experiments that can be done using just one wire with high potential and frequency changes. We can connect an insulated line to a source of these currents, send a small current through the line, and at any point along it, we can generate a strong current capable of melting thick copper wire. Alternatively, with a bit of creativity, we can break down a solution in any electrolytic cell by connecting only one pole of the cell to the line or energy source. We can also light up an incandescent lamp, an empty tube, or a phosphorescent bulb by attaching it to the line or even just bringing it close.

However impracticable this plan of working may appear in many cases, it certainly seems practicable, and even recommendable, in the production of light. A perfected lamp would require but little energy, and if wires were used at all we ought to be able to supply that energy without a return wire.

However impractical this working plan may seem in many situations, it definitely appears feasible, and even advisable, for producing light. An ideal lamp would need very little energy, and if wires are used at all, we should be able to provide that energy without needing a return wire.

It is now a fact that a body may be rendered incandescent or phosphorescent by bringing it either in single contact or merely in the vicinity of a source of electric impulses of the proper character, and that in this manner a quantity of light sufficient to afford a practical illuminant may be produced. It is, therefore, to say the least, worth while to attempt to determine the best conditions and to invent the best appliances for attaining this object.[Pg 237]

It’s now a fact that you can make a body glow or emit light by simply touching it or bringing it close to the right source of electric impulses. This can produce enough light to be useful for practical lighting. Therefore, it’s definitely worth trying to figure out the best conditions and create the best tools to achieve this goal.[Pg 237]

Some experiences have already been gained in this direction, and I will dwell on them briefly, in the hope that they might prove useful.

Some experiences have already been gathered in this area, and I will touch on them briefly, hoping they might be helpful.

The heating of a conducting body inclosed in a bulb, and connected to a source of rapidly alternating electric impulses, is dependent on so many things of a different nature, that it would be difficult to give a generally applicable rule under which the maximum heating occurs. As regards the size of the vessel, I have lately found that at ordinary or only slightly differing atmospheric pressures, when air is a good insulator, and hence practically the same amount of energy by a certain potential and frequency is given off from the body, whether the bulb be small or large, the body is brought to a higher temperature if enclosed in a small bulb, because of the better confinement of heat in this case.

The heating of a conducting object enclosed in a bulb and connected to a source of rapidly alternating electric impulses depends on many different factors, making it hard to provide a general rule for when maximum heating occurs. Regarding the size of the vessel, I've recently discovered that at normal or slightly varying atmospheric pressures, when air acts as a good insulator, the same amount of energy at a certain potential and frequency is released from the object, whether the bulb is small or large. However, the object reaches a higher temperature when it's enclosed in a small bulb due to better heat retention in that case.

At lower pressures, when air becomes more or less conducting, or if the air be sufficiently warmed to become conducting, the body is rendered more intensely incandescent in a large bulb, obviously because, under otherwise equal conditions of test, more energy may be given off from the body when the bulb is large.

At lower pressures, when air starts to conduct electricity, or if the air is heated enough to conduct, the body glows more intensely in a larger bulb. This is clearly because, under the same testing conditions, a larger bulb allows the body to release more energy.

At very high degrees of exhaustion, when the matter in the bulb becomes "radiant," a large bulb has still an advantage, but a comparatively slight one, over the small bulb.

At very high levels of exhaustion, when the substance in the bulb becomes "radiant," a large bulb still has a benefit, although it's a relatively small one, compared to the small bulb.

Finally, at excessively high degrees of exhaustion, which cannot be reached except by the employment of special means, there seems to be, beyond a certain and rather small size of vessel, no perceptible difference in the heating.

Finally, at extremely high levels of exhaustion, which can only be achieved using special methods, it appears that beyond a certain small size of vessel, there is no noticeable difference in heating.

These observations were the result of a number of experiments, of which one, showing the effect of the size of the bulb at a high degree of exhaustion, may be described and shown here, as it presents a feature of interest. Three spherical bulbs of 2 inches, 3 inches and 4 inches diameter were taken, and in the centre of each was mounted an equal length of an ordinary incandescent lamp filament of uniform thickness. In each bulb the piece of filament was fastened to the leading-in wire of platinum, contained in a glass stem sealed in the bulb; care being taken, of course, to make everything as nearly alike as possible. On each glass stem in the inside of the bulb was slipped a highly polished tube made of aluminum sheet, which fitted the stem and was held on it by spring pressure. The function of this aluminum tube will be explained subsequently. In each bulb an equal length of fila[Pg 238]ment protruded above the metal tube. It is sufficient to say now that under these conditions equal lengths of filament of the same thickness—in other words, bodies of equal bulk—were brought to incandescence. The three bulbs were sealed to a glass tube, which was connected to a Sprengel pump. When a high vacuum had been reached, the glass tube carrying the bulbs was sealed off. A current was then turned on successively on each bulb, and it was found that the filaments came to about the same brightness, and, if anything, the smallest bulb, which was placed midway between the two larger ones, may have been slightly brighter. This result was expected, for when either of the bulbs was connected to the coil the luminosity spread through the other two, hence the three bulbs constituted really one vessel. When all the three bulbs were connected in multiple arc to the coil, in the largest of them the filament glowed brightest, in the next smaller it was a little less bright, and in the smallest it only came to redness. The bulbs were then sealed off and separately tried. The brightness of the filaments was now such as would have been expected on the supposition that the energy given off was proportionate to the surface of the bulb, this surface in each case representing one of the coatings of a condenser. Accordingly, there was less difference between the largest and the middle sized than between the latter and the smallest bulb.

These observations resulted from several experiments, one of which, demonstrating the impact of bulb size under high exhaustion, is worth describing here because it features an interesting aspect. Three spherical bulbs with diameters of 2 inches, 3 inches, and 4 inches were used, each containing an equal length of a standard incandescent lamp filament of uniform thickness in the center. Each filament piece was attached to a platinum leading-in wire housed in a glass stem sealed within the bulb; care was taken to make everything as similar as possible. On each glass stem inside the bulb, a highly polished aluminum tube that fit the stem and was held in place by spring pressure was slipped on. The role of this aluminum tube will be explained later. In each bulb, an equal length of filament extended above the metal tube. It’s enough to say that under these conditions, equal lengths of the same thickness filament—essentially, bodies of equal size—were heated to incandescence. The three bulbs were sealed to a glass tube, which was connected to a Sprengel pump. Once a high vacuum was achieved, the glass tube holding the bulbs was sealed off. A current was then successively applied to each bulb, and it was found that the filaments achieved about the same brightness, with the smallest bulb, placed between the two larger ones, possibly being slightly brighter. This outcome was anticipated since when either bulb was connected to the coil, the luminosity spread to the other two, essentially making them function as one vessel. When all three bulbs were wired in a multiple arc to the coil, the filament in the largest bulb glowed the brightest, followed by the next smaller bulb, which was slightly less bright, and the smallest bulb only reached a red glow. The bulbs were then sealed off and tested separately. The brightness of the filaments matched expectations based on the assumption that the energy emitted was proportional to the bulb's surface area, with each surface representing one of the layers of a condenser. Consequently, the difference in brightness was less between the largest and the medium-sized bulb than between the medium and the smallest bulb.

An interesting observation was made in this experiment. The three bulbs were suspended from a straight bare wire connected to a terminal of a coil, the largest bulb being placed at the end of the wire, at some distance from it the smallest bulb, and at an equal distance from the latter the middle-sized one. The carbons glowed then in both the larger bulbs about as expected, but the smallest did not get its share by far. This observation led me to exchange the position of the bulbs, and I then observed that whichever of the bulbs was in the middle was by far less bright than it was in any other position. This mystifying result was, of course, found to be due to the electrostatic action between the bulbs. When they were placed at a considerable distance, or when they were attached to the corners of an equilateral triangle of copper wire, they glowed in about the order determined by their surfaces.

An interesting observation was made in this experiment. The three bulbs were hung from a straight bare wire connected to a terminal of a coil, with the largest bulb at one end of the wire, the smallest bulb at a distance from it, and the middle-sized one equidistant from the smallest. The filaments lit up in the larger bulbs as expected, but the smallest didn't get nearly enough light. This observation led me to switch the positions of the bulbs, and I noticed that whichever bulb was in the middle was much dimmer than in any other position. This puzzling result turned out to be due to the electrostatic interaction between the bulbs. When they were placed far apart, or set up at the corners of an equilateral triangle made of copper wire, they lit up in roughly the order determined by their surface areas.

As to the shape of the vessel, it is also of some importance, especially at high degrees of exhaustion. Of all the possible constructions, it seems that a spherical globe with the refractory body[Pg 239] mounted in its centre is the best to employ. By experience it has been demonstrated that in such a globe a refractory body of a given bulk is more easily brought to incandescence than when differently shaped bulbs are used. There is also an advantage in giving to the incandescent body the shape of a sphere, for self-evident reasons. In any case the body should be mounted in the centre, where the atoms rebounding from the glass collide. This object is best attained in the spherical bulb; but it is also attained in a cylindrical vessel with one or two straight filaments coinciding with its axis, and possibly also in parabolical or spherical bulbs with refractory body or bodies placed in the focus or foci of the same; though the latter is not probable, as the electrified atoms should in all cases rebound normally from the surface they strike, unless the speed were excessive, in which case they would probably follow the general law of reflection. No matter what shape the vessel may have, if the exhaustion be low, a filament mounted in the globe is brought to the same degree of incandescence in all parts; but if the exhaustion be high and the bulb be spherical or pear-shaped, as usual, focal points form and the filament is heated to a higher degree at or near such points.

The shape of the vessel is also important, especially at high levels of exhaustion. Of all the possible designs, a spherical globe with the refractory body[Pg 239] in the center is the best choice. Experience has shown that in such a globe, a refractory body of a specific size is easier to heat to incandescence than with other shapes. There's also a benefit to giving the incandescent body a spherical shape, for obvious reasons. In any case, the body should be positioned in the center, where the atoms bouncing off the glass collide. This is best achieved in a spherical bulb; however, it can also work in a cylindrical vessel with one or two straight filaments aligned with its axis, and possibly in parabolic or spherical bulbs with the refractory body or bodies placed at the focus or foci. Although, that's less likely, as the electrified atoms should generally bounce off the surface they hit, unless their speed is excessive, in which case they would probably follow the standard law of reflection. Regardless of the vessel's shape, if the exhaustion is low, a filament mounted in the globe reaches the same level of incandescence throughout. However, if the exhaustion is high and the bulb is spherical or pear-shaped, focal points form, causing the filament to heat more at or near those points.

To illustrate the effect, I have here two small bulbs which are alike, only one is exhausted to a low and the other to a very high degree. When connected to the coil, the filament in the former glows uniformly throughout all its length; whereas in the latter, that portion of the filament which is in the centre of the bulb glows far more intensely than the rest. A curious point is that the phenomenon occurs even if two filaments are mounted in a bulb, each being connected to one terminal of the coil, and, what is still more curious, if they be very near together, provided the vacuum be very high. I noted in experiments with such bulbs that the filaments would give way usually at a certain point, and in the first trials I attributed it to a defect in the carbon. But when the phenomenon occurred many times in succession I recognized its real cause.

To show the effect, I have two small bulbs here that are the same, except one is worn out a little and the other is worn out a lot. When connected to the coil, the filament in the first one glows evenly along its entire length; meanwhile, in the second one, the part of the filament in the center glows much more brightly than the rest. Interestingly, this happens even when two filaments are placed inside one bulb, each connected to a different terminal of the coil, and even more surprisingly, if they are very close together, as long as the vacuum is very high. In my experiments with these bulbs, I noticed that the filaments usually broke at a specific point, and in my early tests, I thought it was due to a flaw in the carbon. But after seeing the phenomenon occur multiple times in a row, I realized what the actual cause was.

In order to bring a refractory body inclosed in a bulb to incandescence, it is desirable, on account of economy, that all the energy supplied to the bulb from the source should reach without loss the body to be heated; from there, and from nowhere else, it should be radiated. It is, of course, out of the question to reach this theoretical result, but it is possible by a proper construction of the illuminating device to approximate it more or less.[Pg 240]

To heat a refractory object inside a bulb to incandescence, it's important for efficiency that all the energy supplied to the bulb comes directly to the object without any loss; from there, it should radiate and not from anywhere else. Achieving this theoretical outcome is obviously impossible, but with the right design of the lighting device, we can get closer to it. [Pg 240]

For many reasons, the refractory body is placed in the centre of the bulb, and it is usually supported on a glass stem containing the leading-in wire. As the potential of this wire is alternated, the rarefied gas surrounding the stem is acted upon inductively, and the glass stem is violently bombarded and heated. In this manner by far the greater portion of the energy supplied to the bulb—especially when exceedingly high frequencies are used—may be lost for the purpose contemplated. To obviate this loss, or at least to reduce it to a minimum, I usually screen the rarefied gas surrounding the stem from the inductive action of the leading-in wire by providing the stem with a tube or coating of conducting material. It seems beyond doubt that the best among metals to employ for this purpose is aluminum, on account of its many remarkable properties. Its only fault is that it is easily fusible, and, therefore, its distance from the incandescing body should be properly estimated. Usually, a thin tube, of a diameter somewhat smaller than that of the glass stem, is made of the finest aluminum sheet, and slipped on the stem. The tube is conveniently prepared by wrapping around a rod fastened in a lathe a piece of aluminum sheet of proper size, grasping the sheet firmly with clean chamois leather or blotting paper, and spinning the rod very fast. The sheet is wound tightly around the rod, and a highly polished tube of one or three layers of the sheet is obtained. When slipped on the stem, the pressure is generally sufficient to prevent it from slipping off, but, for safety, the lower edge of the sheet may be turned inside. The upper inside corner of the sheet—that is, the one which is nearest to the refractory incandescent body—should be cut out diagonally, as it often happens that, in consequence of the intense heat, this corner turns toward the inside and comes very near to, or in contact with, the wire, or filament, supporting the refractory body. The greater part of the energy supplied to the bulb is then used up in heating the metal tube, and the bulb is rendered useless for the purpose. The aluminum sheet should project above the glass stem more or less—one inch or so—or else, if the glass be too close to the incandescing body, it may be strongly heated and become more or less conducting, whereupon it may be ruptured, or may, by its conductivity, establish a good electrical connection between the metal tube and the leading-in wire, in which case, again, most of the energy will be lost in heating the former. Perhaps the best way is to make the top of the glass tube, for about an inch, of a[Pg 241] much smaller diameter. To still further reduce the danger arising from the heating of the glass stem, and also with the view of preventing an electrical connection between the metal tube and the electrode, I preferably wrap the stem with several layers of thin mica, which extends at least as far as the metal tube. In some bulbs I have also used an outside insulating cover.

For various reasons, the refractory body is positioned at the center of the bulb, typically resting on a glass stem that holds the leading-in wire. As the voltage of this wire alternates, the rarified gas around the stem is affected inductively, leading to a violent bombardment and heating of the glass stem. Thus, a significant portion of the energy supplied to the bulb—especially at extremely high frequencies—can be wasted. To prevent this loss or at least minimize it, I usually shield the rarified gas around the stem from the inductive influence of the leading-in wire by adding a tube or coating made of conducting material to the stem. It seems clear that aluminum is the best metal to use for this purpose due to its many excellent properties. Its only downside is that it melts easily, so its distance from the incandescent body must be carefully considered. Typically, a thin tube with a diameter slightly smaller than the glass stem is made from the finest aluminum sheet and slipped onto the stem. The tube can be created by wrapping a properly sized piece of aluminum sheet around a rod, which is secured in a lathe, and then spinning the rod quickly while gripping the sheet tightly with clean chamois leather or blotting paper. This method tightly winds the sheet around the rod, resulting in a highly polished tube made of one or three layers of the sheet. When it is placed on the stem, the pressure usually keeps it in place, but for extra security, the lower edge of the sheet can be turned inward. The upper inside corner of the sheet, nearest to the refractory incandescent body, should be cut diagonally, since this corner often bends inward due to intense heat and comes close to or touches the wire or filament that supports the refractory body. If most of the energy supplied to the bulb is consumed by heating the metal tube, the bulb becomes ineffective for its intended purpose. The aluminum sheet should extend above the glass stem by approximately one inch; otherwise, if the glass is too close to the incandescent body, it can heat up excessively and become somewhat conductive, which could lead to rupturing or establish a strong electrical connection between the metal tube and the leading-in wire, causing more energy loss in heating the tube. Perhaps the most effective method is to make the top of the glass tube about one inch with a significantly smaller diameter. To further mitigate the risk of heating the glass stem and to prevent an electrical connection between the metal tube and the electrode, I preferably wrap the stem with several layers of thin mica that extend at least as far as the metal tube. In certain bulbs, I have also employed an exterior insulating cover.

The preceding remarks are only made to aid the experimenter in the first trials, for the difficulties which he encounters he may soon find means to overcome in his own way.

The earlier comments are just meant to help the experimenter during the initial attempts, as the challenges he faces can soon be resolved in his own way.

To illustrate the effect of the screen, and the advantage of using it, I have here two bulbs of the same size, with their stems, leading-in wires and incandescent lamp filaments tied to the latter, as nearly alike as possible. The stem of one bulb is provided with an aluminum tube, the stem of the other has none. Originally the two bulbs were joined by a tube which was connected to a Sprengel pump. When a high vacuum had been reached, first the connecting tube, and then the bulbs, were sealed off; they are therefore of the same degree of exhaustion. When they are separately connected to the coil giving a certain potential, the carbon filament in the bulb provided with the aluminum screen is rendered highly incandescent, while the filament in the other bulb may, with the same potential, not even come to redness, although in reality the latter bulb takes generally more energy than the former. When they are both connected together to the terminal, the difference is even more apparent, showing the importance of the screening. The metal tube placed on the stem containing the leading-in wire performs really two distinct functions: First, it acts more or less as an electrostatic screen, thus economizing the energy supplied to the bulb; and, second, to whatever extent it may fail to act electrostatically, it acts mechanically, preventing the bombardment, and consequently intense heating and possible deterioration of the slender support of the refractory incandescent body, or of the glass stem containing the leading-in wire. I say slender support, for it is evident that in order to confine the heat more completely to the incandescing body its support should be very thin, so as to carry away the smallest possible amount of heat by conduction. Of all the supports used I have found an ordinary incandescent lamp filament to be the best, principally because among conductors it can withstand the highest degree of heat.

To show how the screen works and its benefits, I have two bulbs that are the same size, with their stems, lead wires, and incandescent lamp filaments connected to the latter, as closely matched as possible. One bulb has an aluminum tube on its stem, while the other does not. Originally, the two bulbs were linked by a tube that connected to a Sprengel pump. After reaching a high vacuum, both the connecting tube and the bulbs were sealed off; they therefore have the same level of vacuum. When each is connected separately to a coil that provides a certain voltage, the carbon filament in the bulb with the aluminum screen glows intensely, while the filament in the other bulb may not even get hot enough to glow, even though the latter usually consumes more energy than the former. When both are connected together to the terminal, the difference becomes even clearer, highlighting the importance of the screening. The metal tube on the stem with the lead wire actually serves two main purposes: First, it works as an electrostatic screen, saving energy for the bulb; and second, to whatever extent it doesn’t act electrostatically, it provides mechanical protection, preventing bombardment and therefore intense heating that could damage the delicate support of the incandescent body or the glass stem with the lead wire. I say delicate support because, to keep the heat more confined to the glowing part, its support should be as thin as possible to minimize heat loss through conduction. Of all the supports tested, I’ve found that a standard incandescent lamp filament works best, mainly because it can handle the highest temperatures among conductors.

The effectiveness of the metal tube as an electrostatic screen depends largely on the degree of exhaustion.[Pg 242]

The effectiveness of the metal tube as an electrostatic shield greatly relies on how well it is evacuated.[Pg 242]

At excessively high degrees of exhaustion—which are reached by using great care and special means in connection with the Sprengel pump—when the matter in the globe is in the ultra-radiant state, it acts most perfectly. The shadow of the upper edge of the tube is then sharply defined upon the bulb.

At extremely high levels of exhaustion—achieved through careful methods and specific tools related to the Sprengel pump—when the substance inside the globe is in an ultra-radiant state, it performs at its best. The shadow of the upper edge of the tube is then clearly defined on the bulb.

At a somewhat lower degree of exhaustion, which is about the ordinary "non-striking" vacuum, and generally as long as the matter moves predominantly in straight lines, the screen still does well. In elucidation of the preceding remark it is necessary to state that what is a "non-striking" vacuum for a coil operated as ordinarily, by impulses, or currents, of low frequency, is not so, by far, when the coil is operated by currents of very high frequency. In such case the discharge may pass with great freedom through the rarefied gas through which a low frequency discharge may not pass, even though the potential be much higher. At ordinary atmospheric pressures just the reverse rule holds good: the higher the frequency, the less the spark discharge is able to jump between the terminals, especially if they are knobs or spheres of some size.

At a somewhat lower level of exhaustion, which is about the typical "non-striking" vacuum, the screen still performs well as long as the matter mostly moves in straight lines. To clarify this statement, it's important to note that what is considered a "non-striking" vacuum for a coil that operates in the usual way, using low-frequency impulses or currents, is not the same when the coil is powered by very high-frequency currents. In that case, the discharge can move freely through the rarefied gas, which a low-frequency discharge might not be able to, even if the potential is much higher. At normal atmospheric pressures, the opposite rule applies: the higher the frequency, the less capable the spark discharge is of jumping between the terminals, especially if they are knobs or larger spheres.

Finally, at very low degrees of exhaustion, when the gas is well conducting, the metal tube not only does not act as an electrostatic screen, but even is a drawback, aiding to a considerable extent the dissipation of the energy laterally from the leading-in wire. This, of course, is to be expected. In this case, namely, the metal tube is in good electrical connection with the leading-in wire, and most of the bombardment is directed upon the tube. As long as the electrical connection is not good, the conducting tube is always of some advantage, for although it may not greatly economize energy, still it protects the support of the refractory button, and is the means of concentrating more energy upon the same.

Finally, at very low levels of exhaustion, when the gas conducts well, the metal tube not only fails to act as an electrostatic shield but also becomes a disadvantage by significantly allowing energy to dissipate laterally from the leading-in wire. This is, of course, expected. In this situation, the metal tube is in good electrical contact with the leading-in wire, and most of the bombardment is focused on the tube. As long as the electrical connection isn't good, the conducting tube still offers some benefits, because while it may not save a lot of energy, it does protect the support of the refractory button and helps concentrate more energy on it.

To whatever extent the aluminum tube performs the function of a screen, its usefulness is therefore limited to very high degrees of exhaustion when it is insulated from the electrode—that is, when the gas as a whole is non-conducting, and the molecules, or atoms, act as independent carriers of electric charges.

To the extent that the aluminum tube acts as a screen, its usefulness is limited to very high levels of exhaustion when it is insulated from the electrode—that is, when the gas as a whole is non-conducting, and the molecules or atoms function as independent carriers of electric charges.

In addition to acting as a more or less effective screen, in the true meaning of the word, the conducting tube or coating may also act, by reason of its conductivity, as a sort of equalizer or dampener of the bombardment against the stem. To be explicit, I assume the action to be as follows: Suppose a rhythmical bom[Pg 243]bardment to occur against the conducting tube by reason of its imperfect action as a screen, it certainly must happen that some molecules, or atoms, strike the tube sooner than others. Those which come first in contact with it give up their superfluous charge, and the tube is electrified, the electrification instantly spreading over its surface. But this must diminish the energy lost in the bombardment, for two reasons: first, the charge given up by the atoms spreads over a great area, and hence the electric density at any point is small, and the atoms are repelled with less energy than they would be if they struck against a good insulator; secondly, as the tube is electrified by the atoms which first come in contact with it, the progress of the following atoms against the tube is more or less checked by the repulsion which the electrified tube must exert upon the similarly electrified atoms. This repulsion may perhaps be sufficient to prevent a large portion of the atoms from striking the tube, but at any rate it must diminish the energy of their impact. It is clear that when the exhaustion is very low, and the rarefied gas well conducting, neither of the above effects can occur, and, on the other hand, the fewer the atoms, with the greater freedom they move; in other words, the higher the degree of exhaustion, up to a limit, the more telling will be both the effects.

In addition to serving as a somewhat effective barrier, the conducting tube or coating may also function, due to its conductivity, as a kind of equalizer or dampener of the impact against the stem. To be clear, I believe the process works as follows: Imagine a rhythmic bombardment hitting the conducting tube because it does not entirely block incoming particles; it’s likely that some molecules or atoms hit the tube sooner than others. Those that make contact first lose their extra charge, electrifying the tube, with this electrification quickly spreading across its surface. However, this should reduce the energy lost during the bombardment for two reasons: first, the charge released by the atoms disperses over a large area, so the electric density at any given point is low, and the atoms are repelled with less force than they would be if they were hitting a good insulator; secondly, as the tube becomes electrified by the first atoms that hit it, the movement of the following atoms toward the tube is somewhat hindered by the repulsion the electrified tube exerts on the similarly electrified atoms. This repulsion might be enough to stop a significant number of atoms from hitting the tube, but at the very least, it should reduce the energy of their collision. It’s clear that when the pressure is very low and the rarefied gas is highly conductive, neither of the above effects can take place, and moreover, the fewer the atoms present, the more freely they can move; in other words, the higher the level of vacuum, up to a point, the more pronounced both effects will be.

Fig. 147, 148.
Fig. 147.Fig. 148.

What I have just said may afford an explanation of the phenomenon observed by Prof. Crookes, namely, that a discharge through a bulb is established with much greater facility when an[Pg 244] insulator than when a conductor is present in the same. In my opinion, the conductor acts as a dampener of the motion of the atoms in the two ways pointed out; hence, to cause a visible discharge to pass through the bulb, a much higher potential is needed if a conductor, especially of much surface, be present.

What I've just said might explain the phenomenon observed by Prof. Crookes, which is that a discharge through a bulb happens much more easily with an [Pg 244] insulator than when a conductor is also present. In my view, the conductor slows down the motion of the atoms in the two ways mentioned; therefore, to create a visible discharge through the bulb, a much higher potential is required if a conductor, especially one with a large surface area, is involved.

For the sake of elucidating of some of the remarks before made, I must now refer to Figs. 147, 148 and 149, which illustrate various arrangements with a type of bulb most generally used.

For the purpose of clarifying some of the previously mentioned comments, I now need to refer to Figs. 147, 148, and 149, which show different setups with the type of bulb that is most commonly used.

Fig. 147 is a section through a spherical bulb L, with the glass stem s, contains the leading-in wire w, which has a lamp filament l fastened to it, serving to support the refractory button m in the centre. M is a sheet of thin mica wound in several layers around the stem s, and a is the aluminum tube.

Fig. 147 shows a cross-section of a spherical bulb L, with the glass stem s, which contains the leading-in wire w. This wire has a lamp filament l attached to it, which supports the refractory button m in the center. M is a sheet of thin mica wrapped in several layers around the stem s, and a is the aluminum tube.

Fig. 148 illustrates such a bulb in a somewhat more advanced stage of perfection. A metallic tube S is fastened by means of some cement to the neck of the tube. In the tube is screwed a plug P, of insulating material, in the centre of which is fastened a metallic terminal t, for the connection to the leading-in wire w. This terminal must be well insulated from the metal tube S; therefore, if the cement used is conducting—and most generally it is sufficiently so—the space between the plug P and the neck of the bulb should be filled with some good insulating material, such as mica powder.

Fig. 148 shows a light bulb in a more refined stage of development. A metal tube S is attached to the neck of the bulb using some adhesive. Inside the tube, there's a plug P made of insulating material, with a metal terminal t securely fastened in the center for connecting to the lead wire w. This terminal needs to be properly insulated from the metal tube S; thus, if the adhesive used is conductive — which it often is to some degree — the gap between the plug P and the neck of the bulb should be filled with a good insulating material like mica powder.

Fig. 149 shows a bulb made for experimental purposes. In this bulb the aluminum tube is provided with an external connection, which serves to investigate the effect of the tube under various conditions. It is referred to chiefly to suggest a line of experiment followed.

Fig. 149 shows a bulb designed for experimental use. In this bulb, the aluminum tube has an external connection that allows for testing the tube's performance under different conditions. It is mainly mentioned to suggest a type of experiment conducted.

Since the bombardment against the stem containing the leading-in wire is due to the inductive action of the latter upon the rarefied gas, it is of advantage to reduce this action as far as practicable by employing a very thin wire, surrounded by a very thick insulation of glass or other material, and by making the wire passing through the rarefied gas as short as practicable. To combine these features I employ a large tube T (Fig. 150), which protrudes into the bulb to some distance, and carries on the top a very short glass stem s, into which is sealed the leading-in wire w, and I protect the top of the glass stem against the heat by a small aluminum tube a and a layer of mica underneath the same, as usual. The wire w, passing through the large tube to the outside of the bulb, should be well insulated—with a glass tube,[Pg 245] for instance—and the space between ought to be filled out with some excellent insulator. Among many insulating powders I have found that mica powder is the best to employ. If this precaution is not taken, the tube T, protruding into the bulb, will surely be cracked in consequence of the heating by the brushes which are apt to form in the upper part of the tube, near the exhausted globe, especially if the vacuum be excellent, and therefore the potential necessary to operate the lamp be very high.

Since the bombardment against the stem containing the leading-in wire is caused by the inductive action of the wire on the rarefied gas, it's beneficial to minimize this effect as much as possible by using a very thin wire, surrounded by thick insulation made of glass or another material, and by keeping the wire that passes through the rarefied gas as short as possible. To achieve this, I use a large tube T (Fig. 150) that extends into the bulb for some distance and has a very short glass stem s sealed at the top with the leading-in wire w. I protect the top of the glass stem from heat with a small aluminum tube a and a layer of mica beneath it, as usual. The wire w, which goes through the large tube to the outside of the bulb, needs to be well insulated—with a glass tube, [Pg 245] for instance—and the space in between should be filled with a good insulator. Among many insulating powders, I have found that mica powder is the best to use. If this precaution isn't taken, the tube T, which extends into the bulb, will surely crack due to heating from the electrical brushes that can form at the upper part of the tube, near the evacuated globe, especially if the vacuum is very good, resulting in a high potential needed to operate the lamp.

Fig. 149, 150.
Fig. 149.Fig. 150.

Fig. 151 illustrates a similar arrangement, with a large tube T protruding into the part of the bulb containing the refractory button m. In this case the wire leading from the outside into the bulb is omitted, the energy required being supplied through condenser coatings C C. The insulating packing P should in this construction be tightly fitting to the glass, and rather wide, or otherwise the discharge might avoid passing through the wire w, which connects the inside condenser coating to the incandescent button m.

Fig. 151 shows a similar setup, with a large tube T extending into the part of the bulb that holds the refractory button m. In this case, the wire running from the outside into the bulb is left out; the energy needed is provided through the condenser coatings C C. The insulating packing P should fit tightly against the glass and be fairly wide, or else the discharge may bypass the wire w, which links the inside condenser coating to the incandescent button m.

The molecular bombardment against the glass stem in the bulb is a source of great trouble. As an illustration I will cite a phenomenon only too frequently and unwillingly observed. A bulb, preferably a large one, may be taken, and a good conducting body, such as a piece of carbon, may be mounted in it upon a platinum wire sealed in the glass stem. The bulb may be exhausted to a fairly high degree, nearly to the point when phosphorescence[Pg 246] begins to appear. When the bulb is connected with the coil, the piece of carbon, if small, may become highly incandescent at first, but its brightness immediately diminishes, and then the discharge may break through the glass somewhere in the middle of the stem, in the form of bright sparks, in spite of the fact that the platinum wire is in good electrical connection with the rarefied gas through the piece of carbon or metal at the top. The first sparks are singularly bright, recalling those drawn from a clear surface of mercury. But, as they heat the glass rapidly, they, of course, lose their brightness, and cease when the glass at the ruptured place becomes incandescent, or generally sufficiently hot to conduct. When observed for the first time the phenomenon must appear very curious, and shows in a striking manner how radically different alternate currents, or impulses, of high frequency behave, as compared with steady currents, or currents of low frequency. With such currents—namely, the latter—the phenomenon would of course not occur. When frequencies such as are obtained by mechanical means are used, I think that the rupture of the glass is more or less the consequence of the bombardment, which warms it up and impairs its insulating power; but with frequencies obtainable with condensers I have no doubt that the glass may give way without previous heating. Although this appears most singular at first, it is in reality what we might expect to occur. The energy supplied to the wire leading into the bulb is given off partly by direct action through the carbon button, and partly by inductive action through the glass surrounding the wire. The case is thus analogous to that in which a condenser shunted by a conductor of low resistance is connected to a source of alternating current. As long as the frequencies are low, the conductor gets the most and the condenser is perfectly safe; but when the frequency becomes excessive, the role of the conductor may become quite insignificant. In the latter case the difference of potential at the terminals of the condenser may become so great as to rupture the dielectric, notwithstanding the fact that the terminals are joined by a conductor of low resistance.

The molecular bombardment against the glass stem in the bulb causes significant issues. For example, I'll mention a phenomenon that is often observed reluctantly. A large bulb can be taken, and a good conductor, like a piece of carbon, can be mounted in it on a platinum wire sealed in the glass stem. The bulb can be pumped to a high degree of vacuum, nearly to the point where phosphorescence[Pg 246] starts to show. When the bulb is connected to the coil, if the piece of carbon is small, it may glow intensely at first, but its brightness quickly fades. Then the discharge might break through the glass somewhere in the middle of the stem, producing bright sparks, even though the platinum wire is properly connected to the rarefied gas through the piece of carbon or metal at the top. The first sparks are exceptionally bright, resembling those drawn from a smooth surface of mercury. However, as they rapidly heat the glass, they lose brightness and eventually stop when the glass at the broken spot becomes glowing hot or generally warm enough to conduct. Seeing this for the first time must seem very intriguing, as it clearly illustrates how drastically different high-frequency alternating currents behave compared to steady low-frequency currents. With low-frequency currents, this phenomenon wouldn’t happen. When frequencies, such as those produced mechanically, are used, it seems that the rupture of the glass mostly results from the bombardment that heats it and weakens its insulation. However, at frequencies achievable with capacitors, I believe the glass could fail without any prior heating. While this might seem odd initially, it’s actually what we would expect. The energy supplied to the wire going into the bulb is released partly through direct action via the carbon button and partly through inductive action through the glass surrounding the wire. This situation is similar to a scenario where a capacitor shunted by a low-resistance conductor is connected to an alternating current source. As long as the frequencies are low, the conductor takes the most energy and the capacitor remains safe; but when the frequency becomes too high, the conductor's role may become minimal. In that case, the voltage difference at the capacitor’s terminals may grow so large that it ruptures the dielectric, even though there’s a low-resistance conductor connecting the terminals.

It is, of course, not necessary, when it is desired to produce the incandescence of a body inclosed in a bulb by means of these currents, that the body should be a conductor, for even a perfect non-conductor may be quite as readily heated. For this purpose it is sufficient to surround a conducting electrode with a non-con[Pg 247]ducting material, as, for instance, in the bulb described before in Fig. 150, in which a thin incandescent lamp filament is coated with a non-conductor, and supports a button of the same material on the top. At the start the bombardment goes on by inductive action through the non-conductor, until the same is sufficiently heated to become conducting, when the bombardment continues in the ordinary way.

It’s not necessary, when trying to create the glow of an object inside a bulb using these currents, for the object to be a conductor; even a perfect non-conductor can be heated just as effectively. For this purpose, it’s enough to surround a conducting electrode with a non-conducting material, as shown in the bulb discussed earlier in Fig. 150, where a thin incandescent lamp filament is coated with a non-conductor and has a button of the same material on top. Initially, the bombardment happens by inductive action through the non-conductor until it heats up enough to become conductive, at which point the bombardment continues normally.

Fig. 151, 152.
Fig. 151.Fig. 152.

A different arrangement used in some of the bulbs constructed is illustrated in Fig. 152. In this instance a non-conductor m is mounted in a piece of common arc light carbon so as to project some small distance above the latter. The carbon piece is connected to the leading-in wire passing through a glass stem, which is wrapped with several layers of mica. An aluminum tube a is employed as usual for screening. It is so arranged that it reaches very nearly as high as the carbon and only the non-conductor m projects a little above it. The bombardment goes at first against the upper surface of carbon, the lower parts being protected by the aluminum tube. As soon, however, as the non-conductor m is heated it is rendered good conducting, and then it becomes the centre of the bombardment, being most exposed to the same.

A different setup used in some of the bulbs constructed is shown in Fig. 152. In this case, a non-conductor m is mounted on a piece of standard arc light carbon so that it extends slightly above it. The carbon piece is connected to a leading-in wire that goes through a glass stem, which is covered with several layers of mica. An aluminum tube a is used as usual for shielding. It's arranged so that it comes very close to the height of the carbon, with only the non-conductor m sticking out a bit above it. The bombardment initially strikes the upper surface of the carbon, while the lower parts are protected by the aluminum tube. However, as soon as the non-conductor m heats up, it becomes a good conductor, making it the center of the bombardment since it is the most exposed to it.

I have also constructed during these experiments many such single-wire bulbs with or without internal electrode, in which the radiant matter was projected against, or focused upon, the body[Pg 248] to be rendered incandescent. Fig. 153 (page 263) illustrates one of the bulbs used. It consists of a spherical globe L, provided with a long neck n, on top, for increasing the action in some cases by the application of an external conducting coating. The globe L is blown out on the bottom into a very small bulb b, which serves to hold it firmly in a socket S of insulating material into which it is cemented. A fine lamp filament f, supported on a wire w, passes through the centre of the globe L. The filament is rendered incandescent in the middle portion, where the bombardment proceeding from the lower inside surface of the globe is most intense. The lower portion of the globe, as far as the socket S reaches, is rendered conducting, either by a tinfoil coating or otherwise, and the external electrode is connected to a terminal of the coil.

I also created many single-wire bulbs during these experiments, with or without an internal electrode, where the radiant material was aimed at or focused on the object[Pg 248] to make it glow. Fig. 153 (page 263) shows one of the bulbs I used. It consists of a spherical globe L with a long neck n at the top, which enhances the effect in some cases by adding an external conducting layer. The globe L is shaped at the bottom into a small bulb b, which secures it firmly in a socket S made of insulating material to which it is glued. A thin lamp filament f, held up by a wire w, runs through the center of the globe L. The filament glows in the middle section, where the bombardment from the lower inside surface of the globe is strongest. The lower part of the globe, up to where the socket S reaches, is made conducting, either with a tinfoil layer or another method, and the external electrode is connected to a terminal of the coil.

The arrangement diagrammatically indicated in Fig. 153 was found to be an inferior one when it was desired to render incandescent a filament or button supported in the centre of the globe, but it was convenient when the object was to excite phosphorescence.

The setup shown in Fig. 153 was found to be less effective when trying to light up a filament or button placed in the center of the globe, but it was useful when the goal was to create phosphorescence.

In many experiments in which bodies of different kind were mounted in the bulb as, for instance, indicated in Fig. 152, some observations of interest were made.

In many experiments where different types of bodies were placed in the bulb, as shown in Fig. 152, some interesting observations were made.

It was found, among other things, that in such cases, no matter where the bombardment began, just as soon as a high temperature was reached there was generally one of the bodies which seemed to take most of the bombardment upon itself, the other, or others, being thereby relieved. The quality appeared to depend principally on the point of fusion, and on the facility with which the body was "evaporated," or, generally speaking, disintegrated—meaning by the latter term not only the throwing off of atoms, but likewise of large lumps. The observation made was in accordance with generally accepted notions. In a highly exhausted bulb, electricity is carried off from the electrode by independent carriers, which are partly the atoms, or molecules, of the residual atmosphere, and partly the atoms, molecules, or lumps thrown off from the electrode. If the electrode is composed of bodies of different character, and if one of these is more easily disintegrated than the other, most of the electricity supplied is carried off from that body, which is then brought to a higher temperature than the others, and this the more, as upon an increase of the temperature the body is still more easily disintegrated.

It was found, among other things, that in such cases, no matter where the bombardment started, as soon as a high temperature was reached, one of the bodies usually took on most of the bombardment, while the others were relieved as a result. This quality seemed to depend mainly on the melting point and how easily the body was "evaporated," or generally speaking, disintegrated—meaning not just the release of atoms, but also larger pieces. The observation was consistent with widely accepted ideas. In a highly exhausted bulb, electricity is carried off from the electrode by independent carriers, which include both the atoms or molecules of the remaining atmosphere and the atoms, molecules, or pieces ejected from the electrode. If the electrode is made of different materials, and one of them is more easily disintegrated than the others, most of the electricity supplied is drawn from that material, causing it to reach a higher temperature than the others, especially since an increase in temperature makes that body even more easily disintegrated.

It seems to me quite probable that a similar process takes place in the bulb even with a homogeneous electrode, and I think it to be the principal cause of the disintegration. There is bound to be some irregularity, even if the surface is highly polished, which, of course, is impossible with most of the refractory bodies employed as electrodes. Assume that a point of the electrode gets hotter; instantly most of the discharge passes through that point, and a minute patch it probably fused and evaporated. It is now possible that in consequence of the violent disintegration the spot attacked sinks in temperature, or that a counter force is created, as in an arc; at any rate, the local tearing off meets with the limitations incident to the experiment, whereupon the same process occurs on another place. To the eye the electrode appears uniformly brilliant, but there are upon it points constantly shifting and wandering around, of a temperature far above the mean, and this materially hastens the process of deterioration. That some such thing occurs, at least when the electrode is at a lower temperature, sufficient experimental evidence can be obtained in the following manner: Exhaust a bulb to a very high degree, so that with a fairly high potential the discharge cannot pass—that is, not a luminous one, for a weak invisible discharge occurs always, in all probability. Now raise slowly and carefully the potential, leaving the primary current on no more than for an instant. At a certain point, two, three, or half a dozen phosphorescent spots will appear on the globe. These places of the glass are evidently more violently bombarded than others, this being due to the unevenly distributed electric density, necessitated, of course, by sharp projections, or, generally speaking, irregularities of the electrode. But the luminous patches are constantly changing in position, which is especially well observable if one manages to produce very few, and this indicates that the configuration of the electrode is rapidly changing.

It seems quite likely to me that a similar process happens in the bulb even with a uniform electrode, and I believe this is the main reason for the breakdown. There are bound to be some imperfections, even if the surface is very polished, which, of course, is nearly impossible with most materials used as electrodes. If a part of the electrode gets hotter, most of the discharge will flow through that spot, likely causing it to fuse and evaporate. It’s possible that due to the intense breakdown, the affected area cools down, or that a counter force is created, as in an arc; in any case, the local tearing meets the limits of the experiment, and the same process happens in another location. To the eye, the electrode looks uniformly bright, but there are points constantly shifting and moving around, at temperatures much higher than average, which significantly speeds up the degradation process. That some version of this happens, especially when the electrode is at a lower temperature, can be demonstrated with the following experiment: evacuate a bulb to a very high degree, so that with a relatively high potential, a discharge cannot occur—not a luminous one, since a weak invisible discharge likely always happens. Now slowly and carefully increase the potential but keep the primary current on for no more than a moment. At a certain point, two, three, or several phosphorescent spots will appear on the globe. These areas of the glass are clearly being bombarded more violently than others, which is due to the uneven distribution of electric density caused by sharp projections or more generally, irregularities of the electrode. However, the luminous patches are constantly moving around, which is especially noticeable if you manage to create very few of them, indicating that the shape of the electrode is changing rapidly.

From experiences of this kind I am led to infer that, in order to be most durable, the refractory button in the bulb should be in the form of a sphere with a highly polished surface. Such a small sphere could be manufactured from a diamond or some other crystal, but a better way would be to fuse, by the employment of extreme degrees of temperature, some oxide—as, for instance, zirconia—into a small drop, and then keep it in the bulb at a temperature somewhat below its point of fusion.

From experiences like this, I've come to realize that for the refractory button in the bulb to last the longest, it should be shaped like a sphere with a smooth, polished surface. This small sphere could be made from diamond or another crystal, but a better approach would be to melt some oxide, like zirconia, into a small droplet using extremely high temperatures, and then maintain it in the bulb at a temperature slightly below its melting point.

Interesting and useful results can, no doubt, be reached in the[Pg 250] direction of extreme degrees of heat. How can such high temperatures be arrived at? How are the highest degrees of heat reached in nature? By the impact of stars, by high speeds and collisions. In a collision any rate of heat generation may be attained. In a chemical process we are limited. When oxygen and hydrogen combine, they fall, metaphorically speaking, from a definite height. We cannot go very far with a blast, nor by confining heat in a furnace, but in an exhausted bulb we can concentrate any amount of energy upon a minute button. Leaving practicability out of consideration, this, then, would be the means which, in my opinion, would enable us to reach the highest temperature. But a great difficulty when proceeding in this way is encountered, namely, in most cases the body is carried off before it can fuse and form a drop. This difficulty exists principally with an oxide, such as zirconia, because it cannot be compressed in so hard a cake that it would not be carried off quickly. I have endeavored repeatedly to fuse zirconia, placing it in a cup of arc light carbon, as indicated in Fig. 152. It glowed with a most intense light, and the stream of the particles projected out of the carbon cup was of a vivid white; but whether it was compressed in a cake or made into a paste with carbon, it was carried off before it could be fused. The carbon cup, containing zirconia, had to be mounted very low in the neck of a large bulb, as the heating of the glass by the projected particles of the oxide was so rapid that in the first trial the bulb was cracked almost in an instant, when the current was turned on. The heating of the glass by the projected particles was found to be always greater when the carbon cup contained a body which was rapidly carried off—I presume, because in such cases, with the same potential, higher speeds were reached, and also because, per unit of time, more matter was projected—that is, more particles would strike the glass.

Interesting and useful results can certainly be achieved in the[Pg 250] realm of extreme heat. How can we achieve such high temperatures? How are the highest levels of heat found in nature? Through the impact of stars, high speeds, and collisions. In a collision, any rate of heat generation can be reached. In a chemical process, we're limited. When oxygen and hydrogen combine, they fall, so to speak, from a certain height. We can’t go very far with an explosion or by confining heat in a furnace, but in an evacuated bulb, we can concentrate a huge amount of energy onto a small button. Setting practicality aside, this would be, in my opinion, the way to reach the highest temperature. However, a major challenge with this approach is that, in many cases, the material gets blown away before it can melt and form a droplet. This issue primarily arises with an oxide like zirconia because it can't be compressed into such a hard mass that it won't be quickly blown away. I have tried multiple times to melt zirconia by placing it in a cup made of arc light carbon, as shown in Fig. 152. It glowed with an intense light, and the stream of particles ejected from the carbon cup was a bright white; however, whether it was compressed into a solid piece or mixed into a paste with carbon, it was blown away before it could melt. The carbon cup containing the zirconia had to be positioned very low in the neck of a large bulb since the heating of the glass by the ejected oxide particles was so rapid that during the first trial, the bulb cracked almost instantly when the current was turned on. The glass heated up more when the carbon cup contained a material that was rapidly blown away—I assume because, in these cases, higher speeds were achieved with the same potential, and also because, over time, more material was ejected—that is, more particles struck the glass.

The before-mentioned difficulty did not exist, however, when the body mounted in the carbon cup offered great resistance to deterioration. For instance, when an oxide was first fused in an oxygen blast, and then mounted in the bulb, it melted very readily into a drop.

The earlier mentioned difficulty was absent when the material placed in the carbon cup showed excellent resistance to deterioration. For example, when an oxide was first melted in an oxygen blast and then placed in the bulb, it easily melted down into a drop.

Generally, during the process of fusion, magnificent light effects were noted, of which it would be difficult to give an adequate idea. Fig. 152 is intended to illustrate the effect observed with a ruby drop. At first one may see a narrow funnel of[Pg 251] white light projected against the top of the globe, where it produces an irregularly outlined phosphorescent patch. When the point of the ruby fuses, the phosphorescence becomes very powerful; but as the atoms are projected with much greater speed from the surface of the drop, soon the glass gets hot and "tired," and now only the outer edge of the patch glows. In this manner an intensely phosphorescent, sharply defined line, l, corresponding to the outline of the drop, is produced, which spreads slowly over the globe as the drop gets larger. When the mass begins to boil, small bubbles and cavities are formed, which cause dark colored spots to sweep across the globe. The bulb may be turned downward without fear of the drop falling off, as the mass possesses considerable viscosity.

Generally, during the fusion process, amazing light effects were observed that are hard to describe accurately. Fig. 152 is meant to show the effect seen with a ruby drop. At first, you can see a narrow funnel of[Pg 251] white light projected against the top of the globe, creating an irregularly shaped phosphorescent spot. When the ruby point melts, the phosphorescence becomes really strong; however, as the atoms are ejected at much higher speeds from the droplet's surface, the glass quickly heats up and becomes "tired," leading to only the outer edge of the spot glowing. This creates an intensely phosphorescent, sharply defined line, l, that matches the drop's outline, which gradually expands over the globe as the drop enlarges. When the mass starts to boil, small bubbles and cavities form, causing dark spots to move across the globe. The bulb can be turned upside down without worrying about the drop falling off, as the mass is quite viscous.

I may mention here another feature of some interest, which I believe to have noted in the course of these experiments, though the observations do not amount to a certitude. It appeared that under the molecular impact caused by the rapidly alternating potential, the body was fused and maintained in that state at a lower temperature in a highly exhausted bulb than was the case at normal pressure and application of heat in the ordinary way—that is, at least, judging from the quantity of the light emitted. One of the experiments performed may be mentioned here by way of illustration. A small piece of pumice stone was stuck on a platinum wire, and first melted to it in a gas burner. The wire was next placed between two pieces of charcoal, and a burner applied, so as to produce an intense heat, sufficient to melt down the pumice stone into a small glass-like button. The platinum wire had to be taken of sufficient thickness, to prevent its melting in the fire. While in the charcoal fire, or when held in a burner to get a better idea of the degree of heat, the button glowed with great brilliancy. The wire with the button was then mounted in a bulb, and upon exhausting the same to a high degree, the current was turned on slowly, so as to prevent the cracking of the button. The button was heated to the point of fusion, and when it melted, it did not, apparently, glow with the same brilliancy as before, and this would indicate a lower temperature. Leaving out of consideration the observer's possible, and even probable, error, the question is, can a body under these conditions be brought from a solid to a liquid state with the evolution of less light?

I should point out another interesting feature that I think I've noticed during these experiments, although my observations aren't definitive. It seemed that under the molecular impact caused by the rapidly alternating potential, the material was fused and remained in that state at a lower temperature in a highly exhausted bulb than it did at normal pressure and with the application of heat in the usual way—that is, at least, based on the amount of light emitted. One of the experiments can be mentioned here for illustration. A small piece of pumice stone was attached to a platinum wire and first melted onto it using a gas burner. The wire was then placed between two pieces of charcoal, and a burner was applied to produce intense heat, enough to melt the pumice stone into a small glass-like button. The platinum wire had to be thick enough to avoid melting in the fire. While in the charcoal fire or when held in a burner to better gauge the heat level, the button glowed very brightly. The wire with the button was then put inside a bulb, and after evacuating the bulb to a high degree, the current was turned on slowly to prevent the button from cracking. The button was heated to melting point, and when it melted, it didn’t seem to glow as brightly as before, which suggests a lower temperature. Setting aside the observer's possible, and even likely, error, the question is, can a substance under these conditions transition from a solid to a liquid state while producing less light?

When the potential of a body is rapidly alternated, it is certain[Pg 252] that the structure is jarred. When the potential is very high, although the vibrations may be few—say 20,000 per second—the effect upon the structure may be considerable. Suppose, for example, that a ruby is melted into a drop by a steady application of energy. When it forms a drop, it will emit visible and invisible waves, which will be in a definite ratio, and to the eye the drop will appear to be of a certain brilliancy. Next, suppose we diminish to any degree we choose the energy steadily supplied, and, instead, supply energy which rises and falls according to a certain law. Now, when the drop is formed, there will be emitted from it three different kinds of vibrations—the ordinary visible, and two kinds of invisible waves: that is, the ordinary dark waves of all lengths, and, in addition, waves of a well defined character. The latter would not exist by a steady supply of the energy; still they help to jar and loosen the structure. If this really be the case, then the ruby drop will emit relatively less visible and more invisible waves than before. Thus it would seem that when a platinum wire, for instance, is fused by currents alternating with extreme rapidity, it emits at the point of fusion less light and more visible radiation than it does when melted by a steady current, though the total energy used up in the process of fusion is the same in both cases. Or, to cite another example, a lamp filament is not capable of withstanding as long with currents of extreme frequency as it does with steady currents, assuming that it be worked at the same luminous intensity. This means that for rapidly alternating currents the filament should be shorter and thicker. The higher the frequency—that is, the greater the departure from the steady flow—the worse it would be for the filament. But if the truth of this remark were demonstrated, it would be erroneous to conclude that such a refractory button as used in these bulbs would be deteriorated quicker by currents of extremely high frequency than by steady or low frequency currents. From experience I may say that just the opposite holds good: the button withstands the bombardment better with currents of very high frequency. But this is due to the fact that a high frequency discharge passes through a rarefied gas with much greater freedom than a steady or low frequency discharge, and this will mean that with the former we can work with a lower potential or with a less violent impact. As long, then, as the gas is of no consequence, a steady or low frequency current is better; but as soon as the action of the gas is desired and important, high frequencies are preferable.[Pg 253]

When a body’s potential is rapidly switched, it's clear that the structure gets jolted. Even if the vibrations are few—like 20,000 per second—the effect on the structure can be significant if the potential is very high. For instance, if we melt a ruby into a drop by consistently applying energy, it will emit both visible and invisible waves in a specific ratio, making the drop look a certain brightness to the eye. Now, if we decrease the supplied energy however we want, and instead provide energy that fluctuates according to a specific pattern, the drop will then emit three types of vibrations when it forms: the usual visible waves and two kinds of invisible waves—the typical dark waves of all lengths and additionally, waves with a distinct character. These latter waves wouldn’t be present with a steady energy supply; however, they contribute to shaking and loosening the structure. If this is true, then the ruby drop will produce relatively less visible and more invisible waves than it did before. It seems, therefore, that when a platinum wire is melted by currents that alternate very quickly, it emits less light and more visible radiation at the melting point compared to being melted by a steady current, even though the total energy used in both fusion processes is the same. To provide another example, a lamp filament can't endure as long with currents of extremely high frequency as it can with steady currents, assuming it operates at the same brightness. This indicates that for rapidly alternating currents, the filament should be shorter and thicker. The higher the frequency—meaning the greater the deviation from steady flow—the more detrimental it is for the filament. However, if this claim were proven true, it would be incorrect to conclude that the refractory button used in these bulbs deteriorates faster with extremely high-frequency currents than with steady or low-frequency currents. From my experience, the opposite is actually true: the button withstands the impact better with very high-frequency currents. This is because a high-frequency discharge travels through a rarefied gas much more easily than a steady or low-frequency discharge, meaning we can operate at a lower potential or with a less severe impact with the former. Therefore, as long as the gas is not a factor, a steady or low-frequency current is preferable; but as soon as the gas's action becomes necessary and significant, high frequencies are better.[Pg 253]

In the course of these experiments a great many trials were made with all kinds of carbon buttons. Electrodes made of ordinary carbon buttons were decidedly more durable when the buttons were obtained by the application of enormous pressure. Electrodes prepared by depositing carbon in well known ways did not show up well; they blackened the globe very quickly. From many experiences I conclude that lamp filaments obtained in this manner can be advantageously used only with low potentials and low frequency currents. Some kinds of carbon withstand so well that, in order to bring them to the point of fusion, it is necessary to employ very small buttons. In this case the observation is rendered very difficult on account of the intense heat produced. Nevertheless there can be no doubt that all kinds of carbon are fused under the molecular bombardment, but the liquid state must be one of great instability. Of all the bodies tried there were two which withstood best—diamond and carborundum. These two showed up about equally, but the latter was preferable for many reasons. As it is more than likely that this body is not yet generally known, I will venture to call your attention to it.

During these experiments, we conducted numerous tests with various types of carbon buttons. Electrodes made from regular carbon buttons lasted significantly longer when the buttons were created using extreme pressure. Electodes made by depositing carbon in traditional ways did not perform well; they quickly darkened the globe. From many experiments, I've concluded that lamp filaments made this way can only be effectively used with low voltages and low-frequency currents. Some types of carbon are so resilient that very small buttons are needed to melt them. This makes observation challenging due to the intense heat generated. However, it's clear that all types of carbon can be melted under molecular bombardment, but the liquid state is likely very unstable. Of all the materials tested, two stood out as the most durable—diamond and carborundum. Both performed similarly, but carborundum had several advantages. Since it's likely that this material isn't widely known yet, I want to draw your attention to it.

It has been recently produced by Mr. E. G. Acheson, of Monongahela City, Pa., U. S. A. It is intended to replace ordinary diamond powder for polishing precious stones, etc., and I have been informed that it accomplishes this object quite successfully. I do not know why the name "carborundum" has been given to it, unless there is something in the process of its manufacture which justifies this selection. Through the kindness of the inventor, I obtained a short while ago some samples which I desired to test in regard to their qualities of phosphorescence and capability of withstanding high degrees of heat.

It was recently developed by Mr. E. G. Acheson from Monongahela City, PA, USA. It’s meant to replace regular diamond powder for polishing gemstones, and I’ve been told it does this job quite well. I’m not sure why it’s called "carborundum," unless there’s something about its manufacturing process that explains the name. Thanks to the inventor’s generosity, I recently got some samples that I wanted to test for their phosphorescence and ability to handle high temperatures.

Carborundum can be obtained in two forms—in the form of "crystals" and of powder. The former appear to the naked eye dark colored, but are very brilliant; the latter is of nearly the same color as ordinary diamond powder, but very much finer. When viewed under a microscope the samples of crystals given to me did not appear to have any definite form, but rather resembled pieces of broken up egg coal of fine quality. The majority were opaque, but there were some which were transparent and colored. The crystals are a kind of carbon containing some impurities; they are extremely hard, and withstand for a long time even an oxygen blast. When the blast is directed[Pg 254] against them they at first form a cake of some compactness, probably in consequence of the fusion of impurities they contain. The mass withstands for a very long time the blast without further fusion; but a slow carrying off, or burning, occurs, and, finally, a small quantity of a glass-like residue is left, which, I suppose, is melted alumina. When compressed strongly they conduct very well, but not as well as ordinary carbon. The powder, which is obtained from the crystals in some way, is practically non-conducting. It affords a magnificent polishing material for stones.

Carborundum can be found in two forms—crystals and powder. The crystals look dark to the naked eye but are very shiny; the powder is almost the same color as regular diamond powder, but much finer. When looked at under a microscope, the crystal samples I received didn’t seem to have a specific shape; they looked more like broken pieces of high-quality coal. Most of them were opaque, but some were transparent and colored. The crystals are a type of carbon that contains some impurities; they’re extremely hard and can withstand an oxygen blast for a long time. When the blast hits them, they initially form a compact cake, probably due to the melting of the impurities. The mass can endure the blast for a long time without further melting, but slow burning eventually occurs, leaving a small amount of a glass-like residue, which I assume is melted alumina. When compressed strongly, they conduct electricity well, but not as well as regular carbon. The powder, which is processed from the crystals, is almost non-conductive. It makes an excellent polishing material for stones.

The time has been too short to make a satisfactory study of the properties of this product, but enough experience has been gained in a few weeks I have experimented upon it to say that it does possess some remarkable properties in many respects. It withstands excessively high degrees of heat, it is little deteriorated by molecular bombardment, and it does not blacken the globe as ordinary carbon does. The only difficulty which I have experienced in its use in connection with these experiments was to find some binding material which would resist the heat and the effect of the bombardment as successfully as carborundum itself does.

The time has been too short to conduct a thorough study of this product's properties, but in the few weeks I've experimented with it, I've gathered enough experience to say it has some impressive qualities in many ways. It can handle extremely high temperatures, is minimally affected by molecular bombardment, and doesn’t blacken the surface like regular carbon does. The only challenge I faced while using it in these experiments was finding a binding material that could withstand the heat and the effects of the bombardment as effectively as carborundum itself does.

I have here a number of bulbs which I have provided with buttons of carborundum. To make such a button of carborundum crystals I proceed in the following manner: I take an ordinary lamp filament and dip its point in tar, or some other thick substance or paint which may be readily carbonized. I next pass the point of the filament through the crystals, and then hold it vertically over a hot plate. The tar softens and forms a drop on the point of the filament, the crystals adhering to the surface of the drop. By regulating the distance from the plate the tar is slowly dried out and the button becomes solid. I then once more dip the button in tar and hold it again over a plate until the tar is evaporated, leaving only a hard mass which firmly binds the crystals. When a larger button is required I repeat the process several times, and I generally also cover the filament a certain distance below the button with crystals. The button being mounted in a bulb, when a good vacuum has been reached, first a weak and then a strong discharge is passed through the bulb to carbonize the tar and expel all gases, and later it is brought to a very intense incandescence.

I have a number of bulbs equipped with carborundum buttons. To make a carborundum button from crystals, I follow these steps: I take a regular lamp filament and dip the tip in tar or another thick substance that can be easily carbonized. Then, I pass the tip of the filament through the crystals and hold it vertically over a hot plate. The tar softens and forms a drop on the tip of the filament, with the crystals sticking to the surface of the drop. By adjusting the distance from the plate, the tar is gradually dried out, and the button solidifies. I then dip the button in tar again and hold it over the plate until the tar evaporates, leaving behind a solid mass that securely holds the crystals. If a larger button is needed, I repeat the process several times and usually also cover a section of the filament below the button with crystals. Once the button is mounted in a bulb and a good vacuum is achieved, I first pass a weak discharge through the bulb and then a strong one to carbonize the tar and remove all gases, followed by bringing it to a very intense brightness.

When the powder is used I have found it best to proceed as follows: I make a thick paint of carborundum and tar, and pass a lamp filament through the paint. Taking then most of the[Pg 255] paint off by rubbing the filament against a piece of chamois leather, I hold it over a hot plate until the tar evaporates and the coating becomes firm. I repeat this process as many times as it is necessary to obtain a certain thickness of coating. On the point of the coated filament I form a button in the same manner.

When I use the powder, I’ve found it works best to do the following: I create a thick paint using carborundum and tar, then dip a lamp filament into the paint. After that, I remove most of the[Pg 255] paint by rubbing the filament against a piece of chamois leather, and I hold it over a hot plate until the tar evaporates and the coating hardens. I repeat this process as many times as needed to achieve the desired thickness of the coating. On the tip of the coated filament, I form a button in the same way.

There is no doubt that such a button—properly prepared under great pressure—of carborundum, especially of powder of the best quality, will withstand the effect of the bombardment fully as well as anything we know. The difficulty is that the binding material gives way, and the carborundum is slowly thrown off after some time. As it does not seem to blacken the globe in the least, it might be found useful for coating the filaments of ordinary incandescent lamps, and I think that it is even possible to produce thin threads or sticks of carborundum which will replace the ordinary filaments in an incandescent lamp. A carborundum coating seems to be more durable than other coatings, not only because the carborundum can withstand high degrees of heat, but also because it seems to unite with the carbon better than any other material I have tried. A coating of zirconia or any other oxide, for instance, is far more quickly destroyed. I prepared buttons of diamond dust in the same manner as of carborundum, and these came in durability nearest to those prepared of carborundum, but the binding paste gave way much more quickly in the diamond buttons; this, however, I attributed to the size and irregularity of the grains of the diamond.

There’s no doubt that a button—properly made under high pressure—of carborundum, especially fine quality powder, will hold up against the impact just as well as anything we know. The challenge is that the binding material fails, and the carborundum gradually wears off over time. Since it doesn’t seem to blacken the globe at all, it could be useful for coating the filaments of regular incandescent lamps, and I believe it’s even possible to create thin threads or sticks of carborundum that could replace standard filaments in an incandescent lamp. A carborundum coating appears to last longer than other coatings, not only because carborundum can handle high temperatures, but also because it bonds with carbon better than any other material I've tested. For example, a coating of zirconia or any other oxide wears away much faster. I made buttons from diamond dust in the same way as with carborundum, and these were nearly as durable as the carborundum buttons, but the binding paste gave way much faster in the diamond buttons; I attributed this to the size and irregularity of the diamond grains.

It was of interest to find whether carborundum possesses the quality of phosphorescence. One is, of course, prepared to encounter two difficulties: first, as regards the rough product, the "crystals," they are good conducting, and it is a fact that conductors do not phosphoresce; second, the powder, being exceedingly fine, would not be apt to exhibit very prominently this quality, since we know that when crystals, even such as diamond or ruby, are finely powdered, they lose the property of phosphorescence to a considerable degree.

It was interesting to find out if carborundum has the property of phosphorescence. Naturally, there are two challenges to consider: first, the rough product, the "crystals," are good conductors, and it's known that conductors don't phosphoresce; second, the powder is extremely fine, which likely means it wouldn’t show this quality very clearly, since we know that when crystals, even like diamond or ruby, are finely powdered, they significantly lose their phosphorescent properties.

The question presents itself here, can a conductor phosphoresce? What is there in such a body as a metal, for instance, that would deprive it of the quality of phosphoresence, unless it is that property which characterizes it as a conductor? For it is a fact that most of the phosphorescent bodies lose that quality when they are sufficiently heated to become more or less conducting.[Pg 256] Then, if a metal be in a large measure, or perhaps entirely, deprived of that property, it should be capable of phosphoresence. Therefore it is quite possible that at some extremely high frequency, when behaving practically as a non-conductor, a metal or any other conductor might exhibit the quality of phosphoresence, even though it be entirely incapable of phosphorescing under the impact of a low-frequency discharge. There is, however, another possible way how a conductor might at least appear to phosphoresce.

The question arises: Can a conductor glow in the dark? What is it about a metal, for example, that prevents it from having this property, unless it’s the very characteristic that makes it a conductor? It's true that most glowing substances lose this ability when heated enough to become at least somewhat conductive.[Pg 256] So, if a metal is largely, or even completely, stripped of that property, it should be able to glow in the dark. Therefore, it’s quite possible that at some very high frequency, acting almost like a non-conductor, a metal or any other conductor could show the ability to glow, even if it can't glow at all when a low-frequency current is applied. However, there’s also another way a conductor might at least seem to glow.

Considerable doubt still exists as to what really is phosphorescence, and as to whether the various phenomena comprised under this head are due to the same causes. Suppose that in an exhausted bulb, under the molecular impact, the surface of a piece of metal or other conductor is rendered strongly luminous, but at the same time it is found that it remains comparatively cool, would not this luminosity be called phosphorescence? Now such a result, theoretically at least, is possible, for it is a mere question of potential or speed. Assume the potential of the electrode, and consequently the speed of the projected atoms, to be sufficiently high, the surface of the metal piece, against which the atoms are projected, would be rendered highly incandescent, since the process of heat generation would be incomparably faster than that of radiating or conducting away from the surface of the collision. In the eye of the observer a single impact of the atoms would cause an instantaneous flash, but if the impacts were repeated with sufficient rapidity, they would produce a continuous impression upon his retina. To him then the surface of the metal would appear continuously incandescent and of constant luminous intensity, while in reality the light would be either intermittent, or at least changing periodically in intensity. The metal piece would rise in temperature until equilibrium was attained—that is, until the energy continuously radiated would equal that intermittently supplied. But the supplied energy might under such conditions not be sufficient to bring the body to any more than a very moderate mean temperature, especially if the frequency of the atomic impacts be very low—just enough that the fluctuation of the intensity of the light emitted could not be detected by the eye. The body would now, owing to the manner in which the energy is supplied, emit a strong light, and yet be at a comparatively very low mean temperature. How should the observer name the luminosity thus produced? Even if[Pg 257] the analysis of the light would teach him something definite, still he would probably rank it under the phenomena of phosphorescence. It is conceivable that in such a way both conducting and non-conducting bodies may be maintained at a certain luminous intensity, but the energy required would very greatly vary with the nature and properties of the bodies.

Considerable doubt still exists about what phosphorescence really is and whether the various phenomena grouped under this term are due to the same causes. Imagine that in a vacuum bulb, when particles hit the surface of a metal or other conductor, it becomes intensely luminous, yet it remains relatively cool. Wouldn't we call this phosphorescence? This outcome is theoretically possible; it's simply a matter of potential or speed. If the potential of the electrode—and therefore the speed of the projected atoms—is high enough, the surface of the metal where the atoms hit would become highly incandescent because heat generation would happen much faster than heat could escape or be conducted away from the collision surface. To an observer, a single impact of the atoms would result in a quick flash, but if the impacts occurred rapidly enough, it would create a continuous impression on their retina. So, the metal surface would seem to glow steadily and with consistent brightness, even though in reality, the light would be either intermittent or changing in intensity periodically. The temperature of the metal would rise until it reached equilibrium—that is, until the energy lost through radiation matched the energy being supplied. However, under these conditions, the supplied energy might not be enough to raise the temperature significantly, especially if the frequency of atomic impacts is low—just enough so that the fluctuations in light intensity can't be detected by the eye. As a result, the body would emit a strong light while being at a comparatively low average temperature. How should the observer label the luminosity produced this way? Even if analyzing the light offered some clear insights, the observer would likely categorize it as a type of phosphorescence. It's possible for both conductive and non-conductive materials to maintain a certain level of brightness, but the energy needed would vary significantly depending on the specific characteristics and properties of those materials.

These and some foregoing remarks of a speculative nature were made merely to bring out curious features of alternate currents or electric impulses. By their help we may cause a body to emit more light, while at a certain mean temperature, than it would emit if brought to that temperature by a steady supply; and, again, we may bring a body to the point of fusion, and cause it to emit less light than when fused by the application of energy in ordinary ways. It all depends on how we supply the energy, and what kind of vibrations we set up; in one case the vibrations are more, in the other less, adapted to affect our sense of vision.

These and some earlier remarks of a theoretical nature were made just to highlight interesting aspects of alternating currents or electric impulses. With their help, we can make an object emit more light at a specific average temperature than it would if it reached that temperature with a constant energy supply. Conversely, we can bring an object to its melting point and make it emit less light than when it is melted using traditional methods of energy application. It all depends on how we provide the energy and what types of vibrations we create; in one case, the vibrations are more effective, while in the other, they are less effective in influencing our sense of sight.

Some effects, which I had not observed before, obtained with carborundum in the first trials, I attributed to phosphorescence, but in subsequent experiments it appeared that it was devoid of that quality. The crystals possess a noteworthy feature. In a bulb provided with a single electrode in the shape of a small circular metal disc, for instance, at a certain degree of exhaustion the electrode is covered with a milky film, which is separated by a dark space from the glow filling the bulb. When the metal disc is covered with carborundum crystals, the film is far more intense, and snow-white. This I found later to be merely an effect of the bright surface of the crystals, for when an aluminum electrode was highly polished, it exhibited more or less the same phenomenon. I made a number of experiments with the samples of crystals obtained, principally because it would have been of special interest to find that they are capable of phosphorescence, on account of their being conducting. I could not produce phosphorescence distinctly, but I must remark that a decisive opinion cannot be formed until other experimenters have gone over the same ground.

Some effects that I hadn't noticed before, observed with carborundum in the initial experiments, I thought were due to phosphorescence, but in later tests, it turned out that it lacks that property. The crystals have an interesting characteristic. In a bulb with a single electrode shaped like a small circular metal disc, for example, at a certain level of vacuum, the electrode gets covered with a milky film, which is separated by a dark gap from the glow inside the bulb. When the metal disc is covered with carborundum crystals, the film is much more intense and bright white. I later discovered that this was just a result of the shiny surface of the crystals, since when an aluminum electrode was highly polished, it displayed a similar effect. I conducted several experiments with the samples of crystals I obtained, mainly because it would have been particularly interesting to find that they could exhibit phosphorescence since they are conductive. I couldn't produce clear phosphorescence, but I must note that a definite conclusion can't be reached until other researchers have explored the same territory.

The powder behaved in some experiments as though it contained alumina, but it did not exhibit with sufficient distinctness the red of the latter. Its dead color brightens considerably under the molecular impact, but I am now convinced it does not phosphoresce. Still, the tests with the powder are not conclusive, because powdered carborundum probably does not behave like a[Pg 258] phosphorescent sulphide, for example, which could be finely powdered without impairing the phosphorescence, but rather like powdered ruby or diamond, and therefore it would be necessary, in order to make a decisive test, to obtain it in a large lump and polish up the surface.

The powder acted in some experiments as if it contained alumina, but it didn't show the red color of alumina clearly enough. Its dull color can brighten quite a bit when subjected to molecular impact, but I'm now convinced it doesn't glow in the dark. Still, the tests with the powder aren't definitive because powdered carborundum likely doesn't behave like a[Pg 258] phosphorescent sulfide, for example, which could be finely ground without losing its ability to glow. Instead, it behaves more like powdered ruby or diamond, so to really test it, we'd need to get a large chunk and polish the surface.

If the carborundum proves useful in connection with these and similar experiments, its chief value will be found in the production of coatings, thin conductors, buttons, or other electrodes capable of withstanding extremely high degrees of heat.

If carborundum turns out to be useful for these and similar experiments, its main value will be in making coatings, thin conductors, buttons, or other electrodes that can endure very high temperatures.

The production of a small electrode, capable of withstanding enormous temperatures, I regard as of the greatest importance in the manufacture of light. It would enable us to obtain, by means of currents of very high frequencies, certainly 20 times, if not more, the quantity of light which is obtained in the present incandescent lamp by the same expenditure of energy. This estimate may appear to many exaggerated, but in reality I think it is far from being so. As this statement might be misunderstood, I think it is necessary to expose clearly the problem with which, in this line of work, we are confronted, and the manner in which, in my opinion, a solution will be arrived at.

The creation of a small electrode that can handle extreme temperatures is incredibly important for producing light. It would allow us to generate, using very high frequency currents, at least 20 times, if not more, the amount of light that we currently get from incandescent lamps with the same energy use. This estimate might seem exaggerated to some, but I believe it's actually reasonable. To avoid any misunderstandings about this statement, I feel it's essential to clearly outline the problem we face in this area of work and the way I think we can find a solution.

Any one who begins a study of the problem will be apt to think that what is wanted in a lamp with an electrode is a very high degree of incandescence of the electrode. There he will be mistaken. The high incandescence of the button is a necessary evil, but what is really wanted is the high incandescence of the gas surrounding the button. In other words, the problem in such a lamp is to bring a mass of gas to the highest possible incandescence. The higher the incandescence, the quicker the mean vibration, the greater is the economy of the light production. But to maintain a mass of gas at a high degree of incandescence in a glass vessel, it will always be necessary to keep the incandescent mass away from the glass; that is, to confine it as much as possible to the central portion of the globe.

Anyone who starts studying this problem will likely think that what’s needed in a lamp with an electrode is a very high degree of incandescence from the electrode. That's a misunderstanding. The high incandescence of the button is a necessary downside, but what’s truly important is the high incandescence of the gas around the button. In other words, the challenge with such a lamp is to get a mass of gas to the highest possible incandescence. The higher the incandescence, the quicker the average vibration, which increases the efficiency of light production. However, to keep a mass of gas at a high level of incandescence in a glass vessel, it’s always essential to keep the incandescent mass away from the glass; in other words, to confine it as much as possible to the central part of the globe.

In one of the experiments this evening a brush was produced at the end of a wire. The brush was a flame, a source of heat and light. It did not emit much perceptible heat, nor did it glow with an intense light; but is it the less a flame because it does not scorch my hand? Is it the less a flame because it does not hurt my eyes by its brilliancy? The problem is precisely to produce in the bulb such a flame, much smaller in size, but incomparably more powerful. Were there means at hand for[Pg 259] producing electric impulses of a sufficiently high frequency, and for transmitting them, the bulb could be done away with, unless it were used to protect the electrode, or to economize the energy by confining the heat. But as such means are not at disposal, it becomes necessary to place the terminal in the bulb and rarefy the air in the same. This is done merely to enable the apparatus to perform the work which it is not capable of performing at ordinary air pressure. In the bulb we are able to intensify the action to any degree—so far that the brush emits a powerful light.

In one of tonight's experiments, a brush appeared at the end of a wire. The brush was a flame, a source of heat and light. It didn't give off much noticeable heat, nor did it shine with a bright light; but is it any less of a flame just because it doesn't burn my hand? Is it any less of a flame just because it doesn't hurt my eyes with its brightness? The goal is specifically to create in the bulb a flame that is much smaller in size but vastly more powerful. If there were ways to produce electric impulses with a high enough frequency and transmit them, the bulb could be eliminated, unless it was needed to protect the electrode or save energy by containing the heat. But since those methods aren't available, we must put the terminal inside the bulb and reduce the air pressure in it. This is done solely to allow the apparatus to perform the tasks it can't do under normal air pressure. Inside the bulb, we can intensify the action to any extent—so much so that the brush emits a strong light.

The intensity of the light emitted depends principally on the frequency and potential of the impulses, and on the electric density on the surface of the electrode. It is of the greatest importance to employ the smallest possible button, in order to push the density very far. Under the violent impact of the molecules of the gas surrounding it, the small electrode is of course brought to an extremely high temperature, but around it is a mass of highly incandescent gas, a flame photosphere, many hundred times the volume of the electrode. With a diamond, carborundum or zirconia button the photosphere can be as much as one thousand times the volume of the button. Without much reflection one would think that in pushing so far the incandescence of the electrode it would be instantly volatilized. But after a careful consideration one would find that, theoretically, it should not occur, and in this fact—which, moreover, is experimentally demonstrated—lies principally the future value of such a lamp.

The brightness of the light produced mainly depends on the frequency and strength of the impulses, as well as the electric density on the surface of the electrode. It's crucial to use the smallest possible button to maximize the density. Due to the intense impact from the surrounding gas molecules, the small electrode gets extremely hot, but it is surrounded by a mass of highly glowing gas, a flame photosphere, that is many hundreds of times the volume of the electrode. With a diamond, carborundum, or zirconia button, the photosphere can be up to one thousand times the button's volume. At first glance, one might think that pushing the electrode's incandescence to such extremes would cause it to vaporize immediately. However, upon closer examination, one would discover that, theoretically, this shouldn't happen, and this fact—also corroborated by experiments—is what primarily contributes to the future value of such a lamp.

At first, when the bombardment begins, most of the work is performed on the surface of the button, but when a highly conducting photosphere is formed the button is comparatively relieved. The higher the incandescence of the photosphere, the more it approaches in conductivity to that of the electrode, and the more, therefore, the solid and the gas form one conducting body. The consequence is that the further the incandescence is forced the more work, comparatively, is performed on the gas, and the less on the electrode. The formation of a powerful photosphere is consequently the very means for protecting the electrode. This protection, of course, is a relative one, and it should not be thought that by pushing the incandescence higher the electrode is actually less deteriorated. Still, theoretically, with extreme frequencies, this result must be reached, but probably at a temperature too high for most of the refractory bodies[Pg 260] known. Given, then, an electrode which can withstand to a very high limit the effect of the bombardment and outward strain, it would be safe, no matter how much it was forced beyond that limit. In an incandescent lamp quite different considerations apply. There the gas is not at all concerned; the whole of the work is performed on the filament; and the life of the lamp diminishes so rapidly with the increase of the degree of incandescence that economical reasons compel us to work it at a low incandescence. But if an incandescent lamp is operated with currents of very high frequency, the action of the gas cannot be neglected, and the rules for the most economical working must be considerably modified.

At first, when the bombardment starts, most of the work happens on the surface of the button, but once a highly conductive photosphere forms, the button is somewhat relieved. The higher the brightness of the photosphere, the closer its conductivity is to that of the electrode, making the solid and gas act as one conductive body. As a result, as the brightness increases, more work is done on the gas and less on the electrode. Therefore, forming a strong photosphere effectively protects the electrode. This protection is relative, though, and one shouldn’t assume that increasing the brightness actually reduces the wear on the electrode. Still, in theory, at extremely high frequencies, this outcome should be achievable, but likely at a temperature too high for most of the refractory materials known. If we have an electrode that can withstand the effects of bombardment and external stress up to a very high limit, it should be safe to push it beyond that limit. In an incandescent lamp, different considerations come into play. There, the gas doesn’t have any role; all the work is done on the filament, and the lifespan of the lamp decreases rapidly as the brightness increases, forcing us to run it at a lower brightness for cost-effectiveness. However, if an incandescent lamp is operated with very high frequency currents, the impact of the gas cannot be overlooked, and the guidelines for the most efficient operation need significant adjustments.

In order to bring such a lamp with one or two electrodes to a great perfection, it is necessary to employ impulses of very high frequency. The high frequency secures, among others, two chief advantages, which have a most important bearing upon the economy of the light production. First, the deterioration of the electrode is reduced by reason of the fact that we employ a great many small impacts, instead of a few violent ones, which quickly shatter the structure; secondly, the formation of a large photosphere is facilitated.

To perfect a lamp with one or two electrodes, it's essential to use very high-frequency impulses. The high frequency provides two main benefits that are crucial for energy-efficient light production. First, the wear on the electrode is minimized because we use many small impacts instead of a few intense ones that can quickly damage the structure. Second, it helps create a larger photosphere.

In order to reduce the deterioration of the electrode to the minimum, it is desirable that the vibration be harmonic, for any suddenness hastens the process of destruction. An electrode lasts much longer when kept at incandescence by currents, or impulses, obtained from a high frequency alternator, which rise and fall more or less harmonically, than by impulses obtained from a disruptive discharge coil. In the latter case there is no doubt that most of the damage is done by the fundamental sudden discharges.

To minimize the wear and tear on the electrode, it's important for the vibration to be smooth, as any abrupt changes speed up the degradation process. An electrode has a much longer lifespan when it's kept glowing by currents or impulses from a high-frequency alternator that rise and fall in a somewhat harmonic way, compared to impulses from a disruptive discharge coil. In the latter scenario, it's clear that most of the damage comes from the sudden discharges themselves.

One of the elements of loss in such a lamp is the bombardment of the globe. As the potential is very high, the molecules are projected with great speed; they strike the glass, and usually excite a strong phosphorescence. The effect produced is very pretty, but for economical reasons it would be perhaps preferable to prevent, or at least reduce to a minimum, the bombardment against the globe, as in such case it is, as a rule, not the object to excite phosphorescence, and as some loss of energy results from the bombardment. This loss in the bulb is principally dependent on the potential of the impulses and on the electric density on the surface of the electrode. In employing very high frequen[Pg 261]cies the loss of energy by the bombardment is greatly reduced, for, first, the potential needed to perform a given amount of work is much smaller; and, secondly, by producing a highly conducting photosphere around the electrode, the same result is obtained as though the electrode were much larger, which is equivalent to a smaller electric density. But be it by the diminution of the maximum potential or of the density, the gain is effected in the same manner, namely, by avoiding violent shocks, which strain the glass much beyond its limit of elasticity. If the frequency could be brought high enough, the loss due to the imperfect elasticity of the glass would be entirely negligible. The loss due to bombardment of the globe may, however, be reduced by using two electrodes instead of one. In such case each of the electrodes may be connected to one of the terminals; or else, if it is preferable to use only one wire, one electrode may be connected to one terminal and the other to the ground or to an insulated body of some surface, as, for instance, a shade on the lamp. In the latter case, unless some judgment is used, one of the electrodes might glow more intensely than the other.

One of the aspects of loss in such a lamp is the bombardment of the globe. Since the potential is very high, the molecules are propelled at great speed; they hit the glass and usually create a strong phosphorescence. The effect is quite attractive, but for cost reasons, it might be better to prevent—or at least minimize—the bombardment against the globe, as typically the goal is not to excite phosphorescence, and some energy loss occurs from the bombardment. This loss in the bulb mainly depends on the potential of the impulses and the electric density on the surface of the electrode. By using very high frequencies, the energy loss from bombardment is significantly decreased because, first, the potential needed to perform a specific amount of work is much lower; and second, by creating a highly conductive photosphere around the electrode, the same effect is achieved as if the electrode were much larger, which is equivalent to a lower electric density. Whether through reducing the maximum potential or the density, the improvement is accomplished in the same way: by avoiding violent shocks that strain the glass beyond its elastic limit. If the frequency could be high enough, the loss from the glass's imperfect elasticity would be completely insignificant. However, the loss due to bombardment of the globe can be reduced by using two electrodes instead of one. In this case, each electrode can be connected to one of the terminals; alternatively, if it’s preferred to use only one wire, one electrode can connect to one terminal while the other connects to the ground or to an insulated surface, like a lampshade. In the latter scenario, unless caution is exercised, one of the electrodes might glow much brighter than the other.

But on the whole I find it preferable, when using such high frequencies, to employ only one electrode and one connecting wire. I am convinced that the illuminating device of the near future will not require for its operation more than one lead, and, at any rate, it will have no leading-in wire, since the energy required can be as well transmitted through the glass. In experimental bulbs the leading-in wire is not generally used on account of convenience, as in employing condenser coatings in the manner indicated in Fig. 151, for example, there is some difficulty in fitting the parts, but these difficulties would not exist if a great many bulbs were manufactured; otherwise the energy can be conveyed through the glass as well as through a wire, and with these high frequencies the losses are very small. Such illustrating devices will necessarily involve the use of very high potentials, and this, in the eyes of practical men, might be an objectionable feature. Yet, in reality, high potentials are not objectionable—certainly not in the least so far as the safety of the devices is concerned.

But overall, I find it better to use just one electrode and one connecting wire when working with such high frequencies. I'm convinced that the lighting devices of the near future won’t need more than one lead, and they definitely won't require a leading-in wire, since the energy can be transmitted through the glass. In experimental bulbs, we generally skip the leading-in wire for convenience; for instance, using condenser coatings like in Fig. 151 can be tricky when fitting the parts, but those issues wouldn't matter if many bulbs were manufactured. Otherwise, energy can be carried through the glass just as well as through a wire, and with these high frequencies, the energy losses are minimal. Such lighting devices will definitely require the use of very high potentials, which might seem like a drawback to practical people. However, in reality, high potentials aren’t an issue—at least not when it comes to the safety of the devices.

There are two ways of rendering an electric appliance safe. One is to use low potentials, the other is to determine the dimensions of the apparatus so that it is safe, no matter how high a potential is used. Of the two, the latter seems to me the better[Pg 262] way, for then the safety is absolute, unaffected by any possible combination of circumstances which might render even a low-potential appliance dangerous to life and property. But the practical conditions require not only the judicious determination of the dimensions of the apparatus; they likewise necessitate the employment of energy of the proper kind. It is easy, for instance, to construct a transformer capable of giving, when operated from an ordinary alternate current machine of low tension, say 50,000 volts, which might be required to light a highly exhausted phosphorescent tube, so that, in spite of the high potential, it is perfectly safe, the shock from it producing no inconvenience. Still such a transformer would be expensive, and in itself inefficient; and, besides, what energy was obtained from it would not be economically used for the production of light. The economy demands the employment of energy in the form of extremely rapid vibrations. The problem of producing light has been likened to that of maintaining a certain high-pitch note by means of a bell. It should be said a barely audible note; and even these words would not express it, so wonderful is the sensitiveness of the eye. We may deliver powerful blows at long intervals, waste a good deal of energy, and still not get what we want; or we may keep up the note by delivering frequent taps, and get nearer to the object sought by the expenditure of much less energy. In the production of light, as far as the illuminating device is concerned, there can be only one rule—that is, to use as high frequencies as can be obtained; but the means for the production and conveyance of impulses of such character impose, at present at least, great limitations. Once it is decided to use very high frequencies, the return wire becomes unnecessary, and all the appliances are simplified. By the use of obvious means the same result is obtained as though the return wire were used. It is sufficient for this purpose to bring in contact with the bulb, or merely in the vicinity of the same, an insulated body of some surface. The surface need, of course, be the smaller, the higher the frequency and potential used, and necessarily, also, the higher the economy of the lamp or other device.

There are two ways to make an electric appliance safe. One is to use low voltages, and the other is to design the device so that it remains safe regardless of the voltage used. Of the two, I think the second option is better[Pg 262] because it ensures absolute safety, unaffected by any situation that could make even a low-voltage appliance dangerous to people or property. However, practical conditions require not only careful planning of the dimensions of the device; they also demand using the right type of energy. For example, it’s straightforward to build a transformer that can produce 50,000 volts when powered by a regular low-voltage alternating current machine, which might be needed to light a highly exhausted phosphorescent tube, and despite the high voltage, it can be perfectly safe with no discomfort from a shock. Still, such a transformer would be costly and inefficient on its own; plus, the energy produced wouldn’t be used efficiently for lighting. Efficiency requires using energy in the form of extremely rapid vibrations. The task of producing light has been compared to keeping a certain high-pitch note ringing from a bell. It should be noted that it’s a barely audible note; even that description doesn’t fully capture it because of how sensitive the eye is. We can deliver strong hits at long intervals, wasting a lot of energy, and still not achieve the desired outcome; or we could maintain the note with frequent taps, getting closer to the goal while expending much less energy. In producing light, concerning the lighting device, there’s only one rule: to use the highest frequencies available; however, the means for generating and transmitting impulses of such nature currently impose significant limitations. Once it’s decided to use very high frequencies, the return wire becomes unnecessary, simplifying all the devices. Using simple methods, the same result can be achieved as if a return wire were in place. It’s enough to bring an insulated object with some surface near or in contact with the bulb. The surface should be smaller the higher the frequency and voltage used, and, of course, the more efficient the lamp or other device.

This plan of working has been resorted to on several occasions this evening. So, for instance, when the incandescence of a button was produced by grasping the bulb with the hand, the body of the experimenter merely served to intensify the action. The bulb used was similar to that illustrated in Fig. 148, and[Pg 263] the coil was excited to a small potential, not sufficient to bring the button to incandescence when the bulb was hanging from the wire; and incidentally, in order to perform the experiment in a more suitable manner, the button was taken so large that a perceptible time had to elapse before, upon grasping the bulb, it could be rendered incandescent. The contact with the bulb was, of course, quite unnecessary. It is easy, by using a rather large bulb with an exceedingly small electrode, to adjust the conditions so that the latter is brought to bright incandescence by the mere approach of the experimenter within a few feet of the bulb, and that the incandescence subsides upon his receding.

This way of working has been used several times this evening. For example, when the light from a bulb was created by holding it in the hand, the body of the experimenter simply amplified the effect. The bulb used was similar to the one shown in Fig. 148, and[Pg 263] the coil was powered to a low voltage, not enough to make the bulb glow when it was hanging from the wire. To conduct the experiment more effectively, the bulb was made large enough that there was a noticeable delay before it could be made to glow when held. Contact with the bulb wasn't necessary, of course. It's easy to use a fairly large bulb with a very small electrode to adjust the conditions so that the electrode lights up brightly just by having the experimenter come within a few feet of the bulb, and the light dims when they move away.

Fig. 153, 154.
Fig. 153.Fig. 154.

In another experiment, when phosphorescence was excited, a similar bulb was used. Here again, originally, the potential was not sufficient to excite phosphorescence until the action was intensified—in this case, however, to present a different feature, by touching the socket with a metallic object held in the hand. The electrode in the bulb was a carbon button so large that it could not be brought to incandescence, and thereby spoil the effect produced by phosphorescence.

In another experiment, when phosphorescence was activated, a similar bulb was used. Once again, initially, the voltage wasn’t high enough to trigger phosphorescence until the action was increased—this time, however, to show a different aspect, by touching the socket with a metal object held in the hand. The electrode in the bulb was a carbon button so large that it couldn’t be heated to incandescence, which would ruin the effect created by phosphorescence.

Again, in another of the early experiments, a bulb was used,[Pg 264] as illustrated in Fig. 141. In this instance, by touching the bulb with one or two fingers, one or two shadows of the stem inside were projected against the glass, the touch of the finger producing the same results as the application of an external negative electrode under ordinary circumstances.

Again, in another of the early experiments, a bulb was used,[Pg 264] as shown in Fig. 141. In this case, by touching the bulb with one or two fingers, one or two shadows of the stem inside were projected onto the glass, with the finger’s touch creating the same results as using an external negative electrode under normal conditions.

In all these experiments the action was intensified by augmenting the capacity at the end of the lead connected to the terminal. As a rule, it is not necessary to resort to such means, and would be quite unnecessary with still higher frequencies; but when it is desired, the bulb, or tube, can be easily adapted to the purpose.

In all these experiments, the action was strengthened by increasing the capacity at the end of the lead connected to the terminal. Generally, it's not necessary to do this, and it would be totally unnecessary with even higher frequencies; but when it is needed, the bulb or tube can be easily adjusted for that purpose.

In Fig. 153, for example, an experimental bulb, L, is shown, which is provided with a neck, n, on the top, for the application of an external tinfoil coating, which may be connected to a body of larger surface. Such a lamp as illustrated in Fig. 154 may also be lighted by connecting the tinfoil coating on the neck n to the terminal, and the leading-in wire, w, to an insulated plate. If the bulb stands in a socket upright, as shown in the cut, a shade of conducting material may be slipped in the neck, n, and the action thus magnified.

In Fig. 153, for instance, an experimental bulb, L, is shown that has a neck, n, on top for applying an external tinfoil coating, which can be connected to a larger surface. A lamp like the one depicted in Fig. 154 can also be lit by connecting the tinfoil coating on the neck n to the terminal and the leading-in wire, w, to an insulated plate. If the bulb is positioned upright in a socket, as shown in the image, a shade made of conducting material can be inserted into the neck, n, thereby amplifying the effect.

A more perfected arrangement used in some of these bulbs is illustrated in Fig. 155. In this case the construction of the bulb is as shown and described before, when reference was made to Fig. 148. A zinc sheet, Z, with a tubular extension, T, is applied over the metallic socket, S. The bulb hangs downward from the terminal, t, the zinc sheet, Z, performing the double office of intensifier and reflector. The reflector is separated from the terminal, t, by an extension of the insulating plug, P.

A more advanced design used in some of these bulbs is shown in Fig. 155. In this case, the construction of the bulb is as described earlier when referring to Fig. 148. A zinc sheet, Z, with a tubular extension, T, is placed over the metallic socket, S. The bulb hangs down from the terminal, t, with the zinc sheet, Z, serving as both an intensifier and a reflector. The reflector is kept separate from the terminal, t, by an extension of the insulating plug, P.

A similar disposition with a phosphorescent tube is illustrated in Fig. 156. The tube, T, is prepared from two short tubes of different diameter, which are sealed on the ends. On the lower end is placed an inside conducting coating, C, which connects to the wire w. The wire has a hook on the upper end for suspension, and passes through the centre of the inside tube, which is filled with some good and tightly packed insulator. On the outside of the upper end of the tube, T, is another conducting coating, C1, upon which is slipped a metallic reflector Z, which should be separated by a thick insulation from the end of wire w.

A similar setup using a phosphorescent tube is shown in Fig. 156. The tube, T, is made from two short tubes of different diameters, which are sealed at the ends. At the lower end, there is an inner conducting coating, C, that connects to the wire w. The wire has a hook at the top for hanging and runs through the center of the inner tube, which is filled with a good, tightly packed insulator. On the outside of the upper end of the tube, T, there is another conducting coating, C1, onto which a metallic reflector Z is fitted, ensuring it is separated by thick insulation from the end of wire w.

The economical use of such a reflector or intensifier would require that all energy supplied to an air condenser should be recoverable, or, in other words, that there should not be any losses,[Pg 265] neither in the gaseous medium nor through its action elsewhere. This is far from being so, but, fortunately, the losses may be reduced to anything desired. A few remarks are necessary on this subject, in order to make the experiences gathered in the course of these investigations perfectly clear.

The efficient use of such a reflector or intensifier would mean that all the energy supplied to an air condenser must be recoverable, which means there should be no losses,[Pg 265] either in the gas itself or due to its effects elsewhere. This is not currently the case, but fortunately, the losses can be minimized to any level desired. A few comments are important on this topic to clarify the experiences gained throughout these investigations.

Fig. 155. Fig. 155.

Suppose a small helix with many well insulated turns, as in experiment Fig. 146, has one of its ends connected to one of the terminals of the induction coil, and the other to a metal plate, or, for the sake of simplicity, a sphere, insulated in space. When the coil is set to work, the potential of the sphere is alternated, and a small helix now behaves as though its free end were connected to the other terminal of the induction coil. If an iron rod be held within a small helix, it is quickly brought to a high temperature, indicating the passage of a strong current through the helix. How does the insulated sphere act in this case? It can be a condenser, storing and returning the energy supplied to it, or it can be a mere sink of energy, and the conditions of the experiment determine whether it is rather one than the other. The sphere being charged to a high potential, it acts inductively upon the surrounding air, or whatever gaseous medium there might be. The molecules, or atoms, which are near the sphere, are of course more attracted, and move through a greater distance than the farther ones. When the nearest molecules strike the sphere, they are repelled, and collisions occur at all distances within the inductive action of the sphere. It is now clear that, if the poten[Pg 266]tial be steady, but little loss of energy can be caused in this way, for the molecules which are nearest to the sphere, having had an additional charge imparted to them by contact, are not attracted until they have parted, if not with all, at least with most of the additional charge, which can be accomplished only after a great many collisions. From the fact, that with a steady potential there is but little loss in dry air, one must come to such a conclusion. When the potential of a sphere, instead of being steady, is alternating, the conditions are entirely different. In this case a rhythmical bombardment occurs, no matter whether the molecules, after coming in contact with the sphere, lose the imparted charge or not; what is more, if the charge is not lost, the impacts are only the more violent. Still, if the frequency of the impulses be very small, the loss caused by the impacts and collisions would not be serious, unless the potential were excessive. But when extremely high frequencies and more or less high potentials are used, the loss may very great. The total energy lost per unit of time is proportionate to the product of the number of impacts per second, or the frequency and the energy lost in each impact. But the energy of an impact must be proportionate to the square of the electric density of the sphere, since the charge imparted [Pg 267]to the molecule is proportionate to that density. I conclude from this that the total energy lost must be proportionate to the product of the frequency and the square of the electric density; but this law needs experimental confirmation. Assuming the preceding considerations to be true, then, by rapidly alternating the potential of a body immersed in an insulating gaseous medium, any amount of energy may be dissipated into space. Most of that energy then, I believe, is not dissipated in the form of long ether waves, propagated to considerable distance, as is thought most generally, but is consumed—in the case of an insulated sphere, for example—in impact and collisional losses—that is, heat vibrations—on the surface and in the vicinity of the sphere. To reduce the dissipation, it is necessary to work with a small electric density—the smaller, the higher the frequency.

Imagine a small coil with many insulated turns, like in experiment Fig. 146. One end is connected to a terminal of the induction coil, and the other end is connected to a metal plate or, for simplicity, an insulated sphere in space. When the coil is activated, the potential of the sphere fluctuates, making the small coil act as if its free end were connected to the other terminal of the induction coil. If you place an iron rod inside the coil, it quickly heats up, showing that a strong current is flowing through the coil. How does the insulated sphere respond in this situation? It can either act as a capacitor, storing and releasing the energy supplied to it, or it can simply be a drain for energy, with the experiment’s conditions determining which role it takes. Because the sphere is charged to a high potential, it influences the surrounding air or any gaseous medium. The molecules or atoms close to the sphere are attracted more strongly and move further than those that are farther away. When the nearest molecules hit the sphere, they get repelled, leading to collisions at various distances within the area influenced by the sphere. It’s evident now that if the potential is steady, there’s minimal energy loss in this way. The molecules closest to the sphere, after getting an extra charge from contact, aren’t attracted until they lose, if not all, then most of that extra charge, something that happens only after a lot of collisions. The fact that there’s little loss in dry air with a steady potential supports this conclusion. But when the potential of the sphere alternates instead of remaining steady, the scenario changes completely. In this case, a rhythmic bombardment occurs regardless of whether the molecules lose the charge after contacting the sphere. If they don’t lose the charge, the impacts are even more intense. However, if the frequency of the impulses is very low, the energy lost from impacts and collisions isn’t significant unless the potential is extremely high. But with very high frequencies and varying high potentials, the loss can be substantial. The total energy lost per time unit correlates with the product of the impacts per second (the frequency) and the energy lost in each impact. The energy of an impact must relate to the square of the electric density of the sphere, as the charge transferred to the molecule is related to that density. From this, I conclude that the total energy lost must correlate with the product of the frequency and the square of the electric density; however, this principle needs experimental validation. If we accept these points as accurate, then by rapidly changing the potential of a body in an insulating gas, any amount of energy can be released into space. I believe that most of this energy doesn’t dissipate as long ether waves traveling far distances, as commonly thought, but is instead consumed—in the case of an insulated sphere, for example—through impact and collision losses, which means heat vibrations occurring on the surface and near the sphere. To minimize dissipation, it’s necessary to work with a low electric density—the lower the density, the higher the frequency.

Fig. 156. Fig. 156.

But since, on the assumption before made, the loss is diminished with the square of the density, and since currents of very high frequencies involve considerable waste when transmitted through conductors, it follows that, on the whole, it is better to employ one wire than two. Therefore, if motors, lamps, or devices of any kind are perfected, capable of being advantageously operated by currents of extremely high frequency, economical reasons will make it advisable to use only one wire, especially if the distances are great.

But since, based on the earlier assumption, the loss decreases with the square of the density, and because very high-frequency currents waste a lot of energy when transmitted through conductors, it makes sense to use one wire instead of two. So, if motors, lamps, or any other devices are developed that can efficiently operate on extremely high-frequency currents, it will be economically smarter to use just one wire, especially over long distances.

When energy is absorbed in a condenser, the same behaves as though its capacity were increased. Absorption always exists more or less, but generally it is small and of no consequence as long as the frequencies are not very great. In using extremely high frequencies, and, necessarily in such case, also high potentials, the absorption—or, what is here meant more particularly by this term, the loss of energy due to the presence of a gaseous medium—is an important factor to be considered, as the energy absorbed in the air condenser may be any fraction of the supplied energy. This would seem to make it very difficult to tell from the measured or computed capacity of an air condenser its actual capacity or vibration period, especially if the condenser is of very small surface and is charged to a very high potential. As many important results are dependent upon the correctness of the estimation of the vibration period, this subject demands the most careful scrutiny of other investigators. To reduce the probable error as much as possible in experiments of the kind alluded to, it is advisable to use spheres or plates of large surface, so as to[Pg 268] make the density exceedingly small. Otherwise, when it is practicable, an oil condenser should be used in preference. In oil or other liquid dielectrics there are seemingly no such losses as in gaseous media. It being impossible to exclude entirely the gas in condensers with solid dielectrics, such condensers should be immersed in oil, for economical reasons, if nothing else; they can then be strained to the utmost, and will remain cool. In Leyden jars the loss due to air is comparatively small, as the tinfoil coatings are large, close together, and the charged surfaces not directly exposed; but when the potentials are very high, the loss may be more or less considerable at, or near, the upper edge of the foil, where the air is principally acted upon. If the jar be immersed in boiled-out oil, it will be capable of performing four times the amount of work which it can for any length of time when used in the ordinary way, and the loss will be inappreciable.

When energy is absorbed in a capacitor, it behaves as if its capacity has increased. Absorption is always present to some extent, but it's usually minimal and not significant unless the frequencies are very high. When using extremely high frequencies, and therefore also high voltages, absorption—specifically the loss of energy due to a gaseous medium—is a crucial factor to consider, as the energy absorbed in the air capacitor can be a significant portion of the supplied energy. This makes it challenging to determine the actual capacity or vibration period of an air capacitor from its measured or calculated capacity, especially if the capacitor has a very small surface area and is charged to a very high voltage. Many important results rely on accurately estimating the vibration period, so this topic requires careful examination by other researchers. To minimize errors in such experiments, it's advisable to use spheres or plates with a large surface area to make the density extremely low. Otherwise, when feasible, an oil capacitor should be preferred. In oil or other liquid dielectrics, there seem to be no losses like those found in gases. Since it's impossible to completely eliminate gas in capacitors with solid dielectrics, these capacitors should be immersed in oil for cost-effectiveness, if for no other reason; this allows them to be pushed to their limits while staying cool. In Leyden jars, the energy loss due to air is relatively small, since the tin foil coatings are large, closely spaced, and the charged surfaces aren't directly exposed; however, when the potentials are very high, the loss can be significant at or near the top edge of the foil where the air is most affected. If the jar is immersed in boiled oil, it can perform four times the work it can normally do over a long period, and the loss will be negligible.

It should not be thought that the loss in heat in an air condenser is necessarily associated with the formation of visible streams or brushes. If a small electrode, inclosed in an unexhausted bulb, is connected to one of the terminals of the coil, streams can be seen to issue from the electrode, and the air in the bulb is heated; if instead of a small electrode a large sphere is inclosed in the bulb, no streams are observed, still the air is heated.

It shouldn't be assumed that the heat loss in an air condenser is automatically linked to the appearance of visible streams or brushes. If you connect a small electrode inside a non-exhausted bulb to one of the terminals of the coil, you can see streams coming from the electrode, and the air in the bulb gets heated. However, if you put a large sphere in the bulb instead of a small electrode, no streams are visible, yet the air still gets heated.

Nor should it be thought that the temperature of an air condenser would give even an approximate idea of the loss in heat incurred, as in such case heat must be given off much more quickly, since there is, in addition to the ordinary radiation, a very active carrying away of heat by independent carriers going on, and since not only the apparatus, but the air at some distance from it is heated in consequence of the collisions which must occur.

It's also important to note that the temperature of an air condenser doesn't provide a good estimate of the heat loss involved. In this situation, heat is released much more rapidly because, along with regular radiation, there’s a significant amount of heat being transferred by independent means. This means that not only is the equipment itself getting heated, but the air around it is also warming up due to the collisions that take place.

Owing to this, in experiments with such a coil, a rise of temperature can be distinctly observed only when the body connected to the coil is very small. But with apparatus on a larger scale, even a body of considerable bulk would be heated, as, for instance, the body of a person; and I think that skilled physicians might make observations of utility in such experiments, which, if the apparatus were judiciously designed, would not present the slightest danger.

Due to this, in experiments with such a coil, a noticeable increase in temperature can only be seen when the object connected to the coil is very small. However, with larger equipment, even a sizable object, like a person, would be heated. I believe that experienced physicians could make useful observations in these experiments, which, if the equipment is properly designed, would not pose any danger at all.

A question of some interest, principally to meteorologists,[Pg 269] presents itself here. How does the earth behave? The earth is an air condenser, but is it a perfect or a very imperfect one—a mere sink of energy? There can be little doubt that to such small disturbance as might be caused in an experiment, the earth behaves as an almost perfect condenser. But it might be different when its charge is set in vibration by some sudden disturbance occurring in the heavens. In such case, as before stated, probably only little of the energy of the vibrations set up would be lost into space in the form of long ether radiations, but most of the energy, I think, would spend itself in molecular impacts and collisions, and pass off into space in the form of short heat, and possibly light, waves. As both the frequency of the vibrations of the charge and the potential are in all probability excessive, the energy converted into heat may be considerable. Since the density must be unevenly distributed, either in consequence of the irregularity of the earth's surface, or on account of the condition of the atmosphere in various places, the effect produced would accordingly vary from place to place. Considerable variations in the temperature and pressure of the atmosphere may in this manner be caused at any point of the surface of the earth. The variations may be gradual or very sudden, according to the nature of the general disturbance, and may produce rain and storms, or locally modify the weather in any way.

A question of interest, mainly to meteorologists,[Pg 269] arises here. How does the Earth behave? The Earth acts as an air condenser, but is it a perfect one or just a very imperfect one—a simple sink of energy? It's clear that under small disturbances, like those created in a controlled experiment, the Earth functions as almost a perfect condenser. However, it might react differently when its charge is set in motion by a sudden disturbance occurring in the atmosphere. In such cases, as mentioned before, probably not much of the energy from these vibrations would escape into space as long ether radiations, but most of it would likely dissipate through molecular impacts and collisions, releasing energy into space as short waves of heat, and possibly light. Since the frequency of the charge's vibrations and the potential are likely to be high, the energy converted into heat might be significant. As the density is likely unevenly distributed due to the irregularity of the Earth's surface or the state of the atmosphere in different locations, the effects would vary from place to place. Significant variations in temperature and atmospheric pressure can be caused at any point on the Earth's surface in this way. These variations can happen gradually or very suddenly, depending on the type of disturbance, and may lead to rain and storms, or locally change the weather in various ways.

From the remarks before made, one may see what an important factor of loss the air in the neighborhood of a charged surface becomes when the electric density is great and the frequency of the impulses excessive. But the action, as explained, implies that the air is insulating—that is, that it is composed of independent carriers immersed in an insulating medium. This is the case only when the air is at something like ordinary or greater, or at extremely small, pressure. When the air is slightly rarefied and conducting, then true conduction losses occur also. In such case, of course, considerable energy may be dissipated into space even with a steady potential, or with impulses of low frequency, if the density is very great.

From the earlier comments, it's clear how much of a loss factor the air around a charged surface becomes when the electric density is high and the pulse frequency is excessive. However, the process described indicates that the air acts as an insulator—meaning it consists of independent carriers spread out in an insulating medium. This happens only when the air is at around normal pressure or higher, or at extremely low pressure. When the air is slightly thin and conductive, true conduction losses can occur as well. In that case, a significant amount of energy can be lost into space even with a constant voltage or low-frequency pulses, assuming the density is very high.

When the gas is at very low pressure, an electrode is heated more because higher speeds can be reached. If the gas around the electrode is strongly compressed, the displacements, and consequently the speeds, are very small, and the heating is insignificant. But if in such case the frequency could be sufficiently increased, the electrode would be brought to a high tem[Pg 270]perature as well as if the gas were at very low pressure; in fact, exhausting the bulb is only necessary because we cannot produce, (and possibly not convey) currents of the required frequency.

When the gas is at very low pressure, an electrode heats up more because it can reach higher speeds. If the gas around the electrode is tightly compressed, the displacements and, therefore, the speeds are very small, making the heating negligible. However, if the frequency could be significantly increased in such a case, the electrode would reach a high temperature just like it would at very low pressure; in fact, evacuating the bulb is necessary because we can't produce—or possibly transmit—currents of the required frequency.

Returning to the subject of electrode lamps, it is obviously of advantage in such a lamp to confine as much as possible the heat to the electrode by preventing the circulation of the gas in the bulb. If a very small bulb be taken, it would confine the heat better than a large one, but it might not be of sufficient capacity to be operated from the coil, or, if so, the glass might get too hot. A simple way to improve in this direction is to employ a globe of the required size, but to place a small bulb, the diameter of which is properly estimated, over the refractory button contained in the globe. This arrangement is illustrated in Fig. 157.

Returning to the topic of electrode lamps, it's clearly beneficial for such a lamp to keep as much heat as possible concentrated at the electrode by stopping the gas from circulating in the bulb. If a very small bulb is used, it would retain heat better than a larger one, but it might not have enough capacity to be used with the coil, or if it does, the glass might become too hot. A straightforward way to enhance this is to use a globe of the necessary size while placing a small bulb, with a properly measured diameter, over the heat-resistant button inside the globe. This setup is shown in Fig. 157.

Fig. 157, 158.
Fig. 157.Fig. 158.

The globe L has in this case a large neck n, allowing the small bulb b to slip through. Otherwise the construction is the same as shown in Fig. 147, for example. The small bulb is conveniently supported upon the stem s, carrying the refractory button m. It is separated from the aluminum tube a by several layers of mica M, in order to prevent the cracking of the neck by the rapid heating of the aluminum tube upon a sudden turning on of the current. The inside bulb should be as small as possible when it is desired to obtain light only by incandescence of the electrode. If it is desired to produce phosphorescence, the bulb[Pg 271] should be larger, else it would be apt to get too hot, and the phosphorescence would cease. In this arrangement usually only the small bulb shows phosphorescence, as there is practically no bombardment against the outer globe. In some of these bulbs constructed as illustrated in Fig. 157, the small tube was coated with phosphorescent paint, and beautiful effects were obtained. Instead of making the inside bulb large, in order to avoid undue heating, it answers the purpose to make the electrode m larger. In this case the bombardment is weakened by reason of the smaller electric density.

The globe L has a large neck n, which lets the small bulb b pass through. Other than that, the design is the same as shown in Fig. 147, for instance. The small bulb is conveniently supported on the stem s, which holds the refractory button m. It is separated from the aluminum tube a by several layers of mica M, to prevent the neck from cracking due to the quick heating of the aluminum tube when the current is turned on suddenly. The inside bulb should be as small as possible when the goal is to get light solely from the incandescence of the electrode. If the aim is to create phosphorescence, the bulb[Pg 271] should be larger; otherwise, it might get too hot, and the phosphorescence would stop. In this setup, typically only the small bulb shows phosphorescence since there is almost no bombardment against the outer globe. In some of these bulbs built as shown in Fig. 157, the small tube was coated with phosphorescent paint, resulting in beautiful effects. Instead of making the inside bulb larger to avoid excessive heating, it works to make the electrode m larger. In this situation, the bombardment is reduced due to the lower electric density.

Many bulbs were constructed on the plan illustrated in Fig. 158. Here a small bulb b, containing the refractory button m, upon being exhausted to a very high degree was sealed in a large globe L, which was then moderately exhausted and sealed off. The principal advantage of this construction was that it allowed of reaching extremely high vacua, and, at the same time of using a large bulb. It was found, in the course of experiments with bulbs such as illustrated in Fig. 158, that it was well to make the stem s, near the seal at e, very thick, and the leading-in wire w thin, as it occurred sometimes that the stem at e was heated and the bulb was cracked. Often the outer globe L was exhausted only just enough to allow the discharge to pass through, and the space between the bulbs appeared crimson, producing a curious effect. In some cases, when the exhaustion in globe L was very low, and the air good conducting, it was found necessary, in order to bring the button m to high incandescence, to place, preferably on the upper part of the neck of the globe, a tinfoil coating which was connected to an insulated body, to the ground, or to the other terminal of the coil, as the highly conducting air weakened the effect somewhat, probably by being acted upon inductively from the wire w, where it entered the bulb at e. Another difficulty—which, however, is always present when the refractory button is mounted in a very small bulb—existed in the construction illustrated in Fig. 158, namely, the vacuum in the bulb b would be impaired in a comparatively short time.

Many bulbs were made based on the design shown in Fig. 158. In this case, a small bulb b, which contained the refractory button m, was pumped to a very high vacuum and then sealed inside a larger globe L, which was also moderately evacuated and sealed off. The main benefit of this setup was that it enabled extremely high vacuums while still utilizing a large bulb. During experiments with bulbs like the one depicted in Fig. 158, it was discovered that the stem s near the seal at e should be made quite thick, while the leading-in wire w should be thin; this was important because the stem at e could get heated and cause the bulb to crack. Often, the outer globe L was only partially evacuated just enough to let the discharge pass through, resulting in a crimson glow in the space between the bulbs, which created an interesting effect. In some instances, when the vacuum in globe L was very low and the air was a good conductor, it was necessary to place a tinfoil coating—preferably on the upper part of the neck of the globe—connected to an insulated body, to ground, or to the other terminal of the coil to achieve high incandescence in button m, as the highly conductive air could diminish the effect, likely due to inductive actions from the wire w at the entry point e. Another issue, which is always a concern when the refractory button is in a very small bulb, was present in the setup shown in Fig. 158: the vacuum in bulb b would degrade in a relatively short time.

The chief idea in the two last described constructions was to confine the heat to the central portion of the globe by preventing the exchange of air. An advantage is secured, but owing to the heating of the inside bulb and slow evaporation of the glass, the vacuum is hard to maintain, even if the construction illustrated in Fig. 157 be chosen, in which both bulbs communicate.[Pg 272]

The main idea behind the last two constructions was to keep the heat concentrated in the center of the globe by stopping air from circulating. This offers some benefits, but due to the heating of the inner bulb and the slow evaporation from the glass, it's tough to maintain the vacuum, even with the design shown in Fig. 157, where both bulbs are connected.[Pg 272]

But by far the better way—the ideal way—would be to reach sufficiently high frequencies. The higher the frequency, the slower would be the exchange of the air, and I think that a frequency may be reached, at which there would be no exchange whatever of the air molecules around the terminal. We would then produce a flame in which there would be no carrying away of material, and a queer flame it would be, for it would be rigid! With such high frequencies the inertia of the particles would come into play. As the brush, or flame, would gain rigidity in virtue of the inertia of the particles, the exchange of the latter would be prevented. This would necessarily occur, for, the number of impulses being augmented, the potential energy of each would diminish, so that finally only atomic vibrations could be set up, and the motion of translation through measurable space would cease. Thus an ordinary gas burner connected to a source of rapidly alternating potential might have its efficiency augmented to a certain limit, and this for two reasons—because of the additional vibration imparted, and because of a slowing down of the process of carrying off. But the renewal being rendered difficult, a renewal being necessary to maintain the burner, a continued increase of the frequency of the impulses, assuming they could be transmitted to and impressed upon the flame, would result in the "extinction" of the latter, meaning by this term only the cessation of the chemical process.

But the best approach—the ideal approach—would be to reach sufficiently high frequencies. The higher the frequency, the slower the air exchange would be, and I believe there’s a frequency at which there would be no air molecule exchange around the terminal. We would then create a flame that wouldn’t carry away any material, which would be a strange flame, because it would be rigid! With such high frequencies, the inertia of the particles would come into play. As the brush or flame becomes rigid due to the inertia of the particles, the exchange of those particles would be stopped. This would have to happen, as an increase in the number of impulses would mean each impulse's potential energy would decrease, so only atomic vibrations would occur, and the translation motion through measurable space would stop. Therefore, a regular gas burner connected to a source of rapidly alternating potential might have its efficiency increased to a certain limit, and this is due to two reasons—because of the extra vibration added and because of a slowdown in the removal process. However, since renewal would be difficult and renewal is necessary to keep the burner going, a continued increase in the frequency of the impulses, assuming they could be transmitted to and impressed upon the flame, would lead to the "extinction" of the flame, meaning only the end of the chemical process.

I think, however, that in the case of an electrode immersed in a fluid insulating medium, and surrounded by independent carriers of electric charges, which can be acted upon inductively, a sufficient high frequency of the impulses would probably result in a gravitation of the gas all around toward the electrode. For this it would be only necessary to assume that the independent bodies are irregularly shaped; they would then turn toward the electrode their side of the greatest electric density, and this would be a position in which the fluid resistance to approach would be smaller than that offered to the receding.

I believe that when an electrode is placed in an insulating fluid and surrounded by separate carriers of electric charges that can be influenced inductively, a sufficiently high frequency of impulses would likely cause the gas around the electrode to be drawn towards it. For this to happen, we just need to assume that the independent bodies are irregularly shaped; they would then orient themselves so that the side with the highest electric density faces the electrode, creating a situation where it's easier for them to move closer than to move away.

The general opinion, I do not doubt, is that it is out of the question to reach any such frequencies as might—assuming some of the views before expressed to be true—produce any of the results which I have pointed out as mere possibilities. This may be so, but in the course of these investigations, from the observation of many phenomena, I have gained the conviction that these frequencies would be much lower than one is apt to estimate at[Pg 273] first. In a flame we set up light vibrations by causing molecules, or atoms, to collide. But what is the ratio of the frequency of the collisions and that of the vibrations set up? Certainly it must be incomparably smaller than that of the strokes of the bell and the sound vibrations, or that of the discharges and the oscillations of the condenser. We may cause the molecules of the gas to collide by the use of alternate electric impulses of high frequency, and so we may imitate the process in a flame; and from experiments with frequencies which we are now able to obtain, I think that the result is producible with impulses which are transmissible through a conductor.

The general opinion, I’m sure, is that reaching any such frequencies that might—if some of the previous ideas are true—produce the results I’ve mentioned as mere possibilities is out of the question. This could be true, but through these investigations and my observation of many phenomena, I’ve come to believe that these frequencies would be much lower than one would typically assume at[Pg 273] first. In a flame, we create light vibrations by causing molecules or atoms to collide. But what’s the ratio between the frequency of these collisions and that of the vibrations created? It must be significantly smaller than the frequency of the bell strokes and the sound vibrations, or the discharge frequencies and the oscillations of the condenser. We can make the gas molecules collide using alternating electric impulses of high frequency, thus imitating the process that occurs in a flame; and based on the frequencies we can now achieve, I believe that the result can be produced with impulses that can travel through a conductor.

In connection with thoughts of a similar nature, it appeared to me of great interest to demonstrate the rigidity of a vibrating gaseous column. Although with such low frequencies as, say 10,000 per second, which I was able to obtain without difficulty from a specially constructed alternator, the task looked discouraging at first, I made a series of experiments. The trials with air at ordinary pressure led to no result, but with air moderately rarefied I obtain what I think to be an unmistakable experimental evidence of the property sought for. As a result of this kind might lead able investigators to conclusions of importance, I will describe one of the experiments performed.

Connected to similar thoughts, I found it very interesting to show the rigidity of a vibrating gas column. Although it initially seemed daunting to achieve this with low frequencies, such as 10,000 per second—easily generated by a specially built alternator—I proceeded with a series of experiments. My trials with air at normal pressure didn’t yield any results, but when I used air that was moderately rarefied, I obtained what I believe is clear experimental evidence of the property I was looking for. Since results like this could lead capable researchers to important conclusions, I will describe one of the experiments conducted.

It is well known that when a tube is slightly exhausted, the discharge may be passed through it in the form of a thin luminous thread. When produced with currents of low frequency, obtained from a coil operated as usual, this thread is inert. If a magnet be approached to it, the part near the same is attracted or repelled, according to the direction of the lines of force of the magnet. It occurred to me that if such a thread would be produced with currents of very high frequency, it should be more or less rigid, and as it was visible it could be easily studied. Accordingly I prepared a tube about one inch in diameter and one metre long, with outside coating at each end. The tube was exhausted to a point at which, by a little working, the thread discharge could be obtained. It must be remarked here that the general aspect of the tube, and the degree of exhaustion, are quite other than when ordinary low frequency currents are used. As it was found preferable to work with one terminal, the tube prepared was suspended from the end of a wire connected to the terminal, the tinfoil coating being connected to the wire, and to the lower coating sometimes a small insulated plate[Pg 274] was attached. When the thread was formed, it extended through the upper part of the tube and lost itself in the lower end. If it possessed rigidity it resembled, not exactly an elastic cord stretched tight between two supports, but a cord suspended from a height with a small weight attached at the end. When the finger or a small magnet was approached to the upper end of the luminous thread, it could be brought locally out of position by electrostatic or magnetic action; and when the disturbing object was very quickly removed, an analogous result was produced, as though a suspended cord would be displaced and quickly released near the point of suspension. In doing this the luminous thread was set in vibration, and two very sharply marked nodes, and a third indistinct one, were formed. The vibration, once set up, continued for fully eight minutes, dying gradually out. The speed of the vibration often varied perceptibly, and it could be observed that the electrostatic attraction of the glass affected the vibrating thread; but it was clear that the electrostatic action was not the cause of the vibration, for the thread was most generally stationary, and could always be set in vibration by passing the finger quickly near the upper part of the tube. With a magnet the thread could be split in two and both parts vibrated. By approaching the hand to the lower coating of the tube, or insulation plate if attached, the vibration was quickened; also, as far as I could see, by raising the potential or frequency. Thus, either increasing the frequency or passing a stronger discharge of the same frequency corresponded to a tightening of the cord. I did not obtain any experimental evidence with condenser discharges. A luminous band excited in the bulb by repeated discharges of a Leyden jar must possess rigidity, and if deformed and suddenly released, should vibrate. But probably the amount of vibrating matter is so small that in spite of the extreme speed, the inertia cannot prominently assert itself. Besides, the observation in such a case is rendered extremely difficult on account of the fundamental vibration.

It’s well known that when a tube is partially evacuated, a discharge can pass through it as a thin, glowing thread. When created with low-frequency currents from a coil, this thread is inactive. If you bring a magnet close to it, the section nearest the magnet will either be attracted or repelled, depending on the magnet's magnetic field direction. I thought that if such a thread could be made with very high-frequency currents, it would be somewhat rigid, and since it was visible, it could be easily studied. So, I made a tube about one inch in diameter and one meter long, with an outer coating at each end. The tube was evacuated to a point where the thread discharge could be achieved with some adjustments. It’s important to note that the appearance of the tube and the level of vacuum differ significantly when using regular low-frequency currents. As it was easier to work with one terminal, I suspended the prepared tube from a wire connected to that terminal, with the tinfoil coating linked to the wire, and sometimes attached a small insulated plate to the lower coating[Pg 274]. When the thread formed, it extended through the upper part of the tube and disappeared into the lower end. If it had rigidity, it was not exactly like a tightly stretched elastic cord between two supports, but rather like a cord hanging from a height with a small weight at the end. When I brought my finger or a small magnet close to the upper end of the glowing thread, I could disrupt its position with electrostatic or magnetic effects; when the disturbing object was quickly removed, it caused a similar effect as if a suspended cord was moved and then quickly released near its attachment point. This caused the luminous thread to vibrate, creating two clearly defined nodes and a third, less distinct one. Once started, the vibration lasted for about eight minutes, gradually dying down. The speed of the vibration often changed significantly, and I noticed that the electrostatic attraction of the glass influenced the vibrating thread; however, it was clear that the electrostatic effect wasn’t the cause of the vibration, since the thread was generally still and could always be set into vibration by quickly passing my finger near the tube’s upper part. With a magnet, the thread could be split into two, and both parts would vibrate. By bringing my hand close to the lower coating of the tube or the insulation plate if attached, the vibration speed increased; it also seemed to increase by raising the potential or frequency. Thus, either increasing the frequency or sending a stronger discharge of the same frequency seemed to tighten the cord. I didn’t get any experimental results with capacitor discharges. A glowing band created in the bulb by repeated discharges from a Leyden jar should have rigidity, and if deformed and then suddenly released, it should vibrate. But probably the amount of vibrating material is so minimal that despite the extreme speed, inertia can’t play a significant role. Additionally, observing this kind of case is very challenging due to the basic vibration.

The demonstration of the fact—which still needs better experimental confirmation—that a vibrating gaseous column possesses rigidity, might greatly modify the views of thinkers. When with low frequencies and insignificant potentials indications of that property may be noted, how must a gaseous medium behave under the influence of enormous electrostatic stresses which may be active in the interstellar space, and which may alternate[Pg 275] with inconceivable rapidity? The existence of such an electrostatic, rhythmically throbbing force—of a vibrating electrostatic field—would show a possible way how solids might have formed from the ultra-gaseous uterus, and how transverse and all kinds of vibrations may be transmitted through a gaseous medium filling all space. Then, ether might be a true fluid, devoid of rigidity, and at rest, it being merely necessary as a connecting link to enable interaction. What determines the rigidity of a body? It must be the speed and the amount of motive matter. In a gas the speed maybe considerable, but the density is exceedingly small; in a liquid the speed would be likely to be small, though the density may be considerable; and in both cases the inertia resistance offered to displacement is practically nil. But place a gaseous (or liquid) column in an intense, rapidly alternating electrostatic field, set the particles vibrating with enormous speeds, then the inertia resistance asserts itself. A body might move with more or less freedom through the vibrating mass, but as a whole it would be rigid.

The demonstration of the fact—which still needs better experimental confirmation—that a vibrating gas column has rigidity could significantly change the perspectives of thinkers. When low frequencies and small potentials show signs of that property, how must a gas behave under the influence of immense electrostatic stresses that could be present in interstellar space, especially if they could alternate at unimaginable speeds? The existence of such an electrostatic, rhythmically pulsing force—a vibrating electrostatic field—could provide insight into how solids might have formed from the ultra-gaseous origins, and how various types of vibrations could travel through a gaseous medium that fills all of space. In that case, ether might actually be a true fluid, lacking rigidity, and merely existing as a connection to facilitate interaction. What determines the rigidity of a body? It must be the speed and the amount of moving matter. In a gas, the speed can be quite high, but the density is very low; in a liquid, the speed is likely to be lower, although the density can be quite high; and in both situations, the inertia resistance to displacement is practically nil. However, if you place a gaseous (or liquid) column in a strong, rapidly changing electrostatic field and set the particles vibrating at incredible speeds, then inertia resistance comes into play. A body might move relatively freely through the vibrating mass, but overall, it would be rigid.

There is a subject which I must mention in connection with these experiments: it is that of high vacua. This is a subject, the study of which is not only interesting, but useful, for it may lead to results of great practical importance. In commercial apparatus, such as incandescent lamps, operated from ordinary systems of distribution, a much higher vacuum than is obtained at present would not secure a very great advantage. In such a case the work is performed on the filament, and the gas is little concerned; the improvement, therefore, would be but trifling. But when we begin to use very high frequencies and potentials, the action of the gas becomes all important, and the degree of exhaustion materially modifies the results. As long as ordinary coils, even very large ones, were used, the study of the subject was limited, because just at a point when it became most interesting it had to be interrupted on account of the "non-striking" vacuum being reached. But at present we are able to obtain from a small disruptive discharge coil potentials much higher than even the largest coil was capable of giving, and, what is more, we can make the potential alternate with great rapidity. Both of these results enable us now to pass a luminous discharge through almost any vacua obtainable, and the field of our investigations is greatly extended. Think we as we may, of all the possible directions to develop a practical illuminant, the line of[Pg 276] high vacua seems to be the most promising at present. But to reach extreme vacua the appliances must be much more improved, and ultimate perfection will not be attained until we shall have discharged the mechanical and perfected an electrical vacuum pump. Molecules and atoms can be thrown out of a bulb under the action of an enormous potential: this will be the principle of the vacuum pump of the future. For the present, we must secure the best results we can with mechanical appliances. In this respect, it might not be out of the way to say a few words about the method of, and apparatus for, producing excessively high degrees of exhaustion of which I have availed myself in the course of these investigations. It is very probable that other experimenters have used similar arrangements; but as it is possible that there may be an item of interest in their description, a few remarks, which will render this investigation more complete, might be permitted.

There's a topic I need to address regarding these experiments: high vacuums. This subject is not only fascinating but also practical, as it can lead to results of significant importance. In commercial devices, like incandescent bulbs powered by standard distribution systems, achieving a higher vacuum than what's currently typical doesn't yield substantial benefits. In these cases, the work happens on the filament, and the gas plays a minimal role; thus, any improvements would be minimal. However, when we start using very high frequencies and voltages, the behavior of the gas becomes crucial, and the level of vacuum significantly affects the outcomes. The study was previously limited using standard coils—even very large ones—because research had to stop when it reached the "non-striking" vacuum point, right when things got interesting. Now, we're able to get much higher potentials from a small disruptive discharge coil than even the largest coil could provide, and we can make the potential alternate rapidly. These advancements allow us to create a visible discharge through nearly any vacuum available, greatly expanding our research opportunities. No matter how we brainstorm potential developments for a practical light source, the approach of high vacuums appears to be the most promising right now. However, achieving extreme vacuums requires significant improvements in our devices, and we won't reach ultimate perfection until we have a well-functioning mechanical and an advanced electrical vacuum pump. Molecules and atoms can be expelled from a bulb under high voltage; this will be the future of vacuum pump technology. For now, we must make the most of the mechanical devices we have. In this context, it’s worthwhile to mention the methods and equipment I used to achieve extremely high levels of vacuum during my research. Other researchers may have used similar setups, but sharing details could provide valuable insights and make this investigation more complete.

Fig. 159. Fig. 159.

The apparatus is illustrated in a drawing shown in Fig. 159. S represents a Sprengel pump, which has been specially constructed to better suit the work required. The stop-cock which[Pg 277] is usually employed has been omitted, and instead of it a hollow stopper s has been fitted in the neck of the reservoir R. This stopper has a small hole h, through which the mercury descends; the size of the outlet o being properly determined with respect to the section of the fall tube t, which is sealed to the reservoir instead of being connected to it in the usual manner. This arrangement overcomes the imperfections and troubles which often arise from the use of the stopcock on the reservoir and the connections of the latter with the fall tube.

The device is shown in the drawing in Fig. 159. S represents a Sprengel pump that has been specifically designed to better fit the required tasks. The stopcock typically used has been removed, and instead, a hollow stopper s has been placed in the neck of the reservoir R. This stopper has a small hole h, through which the mercury flows down; the size of the outlet o is correctly matched to the section of the fall tube t, which is sealed to the reservoir instead of being connected in the usual way. This setup eliminates the issues and problems that often occur with the stopcock on the reservoir and its connections to the fall tube.

The pump is connected through a U-shaped tube t to a very large reservoir R1. Especial care was taken in fitting the grinding surfaces of the stoppers p and p1, and both of these and the mercury caps above them were made exceptionally long. After the U-shaped tube was fitted and put in place, it was heated, so as to soften and take off the strain resulting from imperfect fitting. The U-shaped tube was provided with a stopcock C, and two ground connections g and g1,—one for a small bulb b, usually containing caustic potash, and the other for the receiver r, to be exhausted.

The pump is connected via a U-shaped tube t to a very large reservoir R1. Extra care was taken in fitting the grinding surfaces of the stoppers p and p1, and both of these along with the mercury caps above them were made exceptionally long. After the U-shaped tube was fitted and positioned, it was heated to soften and relieve the strain caused by improper fitting. The U-shaped tube had a stopcock C and two ground connections g and g1—one for a small bulb b, usually containing caustic potash, and the other for the receiver r, which is to be evacuated.

The reservoir R1, was connected by means of a rubber tube to a slightly larger reservoir R2, each of the two reservoirs being provided with a stopcock C1 and C2, respectively. The reservoir R2 could be raised and lowered by a wheel and rack, and the range of its motion was so determined that when it was filled with mercury and the stopcock C2 closed, so as to form a Torricellian vacuum in it when raised, it could be lifted so high that the reservoir R1 would stand a little above stopcock C1; and when this stopcock was closed and the reservoir R2 descended, so as to form a Torricellian vacuum in reservoir R1, it could be lowered so far as to completely empty the latter, the mercury filling the reservoir R2 up to a little above stopcock C2.

The reservoir R1 was connected to a slightly larger reservoir R2 by a rubber tube, and each of the two reservoirs had a stopcock C1 and C2, respectively. Reservoir R2 could be raised and lowered with a wheel and rack, and its range of motion was set so that when it was filled with mercury and the stopcock C2 was closed—creating a Torricellian vacuum—it could be lifted high enough that reservoir R1 would sit slightly above stopcock C1. When this stopcock was closed and reservoir R2 was lowered, forming a Torricellian vacuum in reservoir R1, it could be lowered enough to completely empty R1, with the mercury filling R2 up to just above stopcock C2.

The capacity of the pump and of the connections was taken as small as possible relatively to the volume of reservoir, R1, since, of course, the degree of exhaustion depended upon the ratio of these quantities.

The pump's capacity and the connections were kept as small as possible compared to the volume of the reservoir, R1, because the level of vacuum relied on the ratio of these amounts.

With this apparatus I combined the usual means indicated by former experiments for the production of very high vacua. In most of the experiments it was most convenient to use caustic potash. I may venture to say, in regard to its use, that much time is saved and a more perfect action of the pump insured by fusing and boiling the potash as soon as, or even before, the[Pg 278] pump settles down. If this course is not followed, the sticks, as ordinarily employed, may give off moisture at a certain very slow rate, and the pump may work for many hours without reaching a very high vacuum. The potash was heated either by a spirit lamp or by passing a discharge through it, or by passing a current through a wire contained in it. The advantage in the latter case was that the heating could be more rapidly repeated.

Using this setup, I combined the standard methods suggested by earlier experiments to create very high vacuums. For most experiments, it was easier to use caustic potash. I can confidently say that using it this way saves a lot of time and ensures the pump works better by fusing and boiling the potash as soon as, or even before, the[Pg 278] pump stabilizes. If this isn't done, the sticks typically used may release moisture at a very slow rate, causing the pump to run for hours without achieving a high vacuum. The potash was heated either with a spirit lamp, by applying a discharge through it, or by running a current through a wire inside it. The benefit of the last method was that the heating could be quickly repeated.

Generally the process of exhaustion was the following:—At the start, the stop-cocks C and C1 being open, and all other connections closed, the reservoir R2 was raised so far that the mercury filled the reservoir R1 and a part of the narrow connecting U-shaped tube. When the pump was set to work, the mercury would, of course, quickly rise in the tube, and reservoir R2 was lowered, the experimenter keeping the mercury at about the same level. The reservoir R2 was balanced by a long spring which facilitated the operation, and the friction of the parts was generally sufficient to keep it in almost any position. When the Sprengel pump had done its work, the reservoir R2 was further lowered and the mercury descended in R1 and filled R2, whereupon stopcock C2 was closed. The air adhering to the walls of R1 and that absorbed by the mercury was carried off, and to free the mercury of all air the reservoir R2 was for a long time worked up and down. During this process some air, which would gather below stopcock C2, was expelled from R2 by lowering it far enough and opening the stopcock, closing the latter again before raising the reservoir. When all the air had been expelled from the mercury, and no air would gather in R2 when it was lowered, the caustic potash was resorted to. The reservoir R2 was now again raised until the mercury in R1, stood above stopcock C1. The caustic potash was fused and boiled, and moisture partly carried off by the pump and partly re-absorbed; and this process of heating and cooling was repeated many times, and each time, upon the moisture being absorbed or carried off, the reservoir R2 was for a long time raised and lowered. In this manner all the moisture was carried off from the mercury, and both the reservoirs were in proper condition to be used. The reservoir R2 was then again raised to the top, and the pump was kept working for a long time. When the highest vacuum obtainable with the pump had been reached, the potash bulb was usually wrapped with cotton which was sprinkled with ether so as to keep the potash at a very low temperature, then the reservoir R2 was lowered, and upon [Pg 279]reservoir R1 being emptied the receiver was quickly sealed up.

Generally, the exhaustion process was as follows: At the beginning, the stopcocks C and C1 were open, and all other connections were closed. The reservoir R2 was raised until the mercury filled the reservoir R1 and part of the narrow connecting U-shaped tube. When the pump was activated, the mercury would quickly rise in the tube while the reservoir R2 was lowered, with the experimenter maintaining the mercury at a similar level. The reservoir R2 was balanced by a long spring, which made the operation easier, and the friction of the parts typically kept it in almost any position. After the Sprengel pump completed its task, the reservoir R2 was lowered further, causing the mercury to descend in R1 and fill R2, at which point stopcock C2 was closed. The air clinging to the walls of R1 and that absorbed by the mercury was removed, and to ensure the mercury was free of all air, the reservoir R2 was moved up and down for an extended period. During this process, some air that accumulated below stopcock C2 was expelled from R2 by lowering it sufficiently and opening the stopcock, then closing it again before raising the reservoir. Once all the air was expelled from the mercury and no air accumulated in R2 when it was lowered, caustic potash was used. The reservoir R2 was raised again until the mercury in R1 stood above stopcock C1. The caustic potash was melted and boiled, with moisture partially removed by the pump and partially reabsorbed; this heating and cooling cycle was repeated multiple times, and each time the moisture was absorbed or removed, the reservoir R2 was raised and lowered for a significant duration. In this way, all moisture was eliminated from the mercury, and both reservoirs were ready for use. The reservoir R2 was then raised to the top again, and the pump was kept running for an extended period. Once the highest vacuum achievable with the pump was reached, the potash bulb was usually wrapped in cotton that was dampened with ether to maintain a very low temperature. Then the reservoir R2 was lowered, and when the [Pg 279] reservoir R1 was emptied, the receiver was quickly sealed.

When a new bulb was put on, the mercury was always raised above stopcock C1, which was closed, so as to always keep the mercury and both the reservoirs in fine condition, and the mercury was never withdrawn from R1 except when the pump had reached the highest degree of exhaustion. It is necessary to observe this rule if it is desired to use the apparatus to advantage.

When a new bulb was added, the mercury was always raised above the stopcock C1, which was closed, to keep the mercury and both reservoirs in good condition. The mercury was only drawn from R1 when the pump had reached its maximum level of exhaustion. It's important to follow this rule if you want to use the apparatus effectively.

By means of this arrangement I was able to proceed very quickly, and when the apparatus was in perfect order it was possible to reach the phosphorescent stage in a small bulb in less than fifteen minutes, which is certainly very quick work for a small laboratory arrangement requiring all in all about 100 pounds of mercury. With ordinary small bulbs the ratio of the capacity of the pump, receiver, and connections, and that of reservoir R was about 1 to 20, and the degrees of exhaustion reached were necessarily very high, though I am unable to make a precise and reliable statement how far the exhaustion was carried.

With this setup, I was able to work very quickly. Once the equipment was fully set up, I could achieve the phosphorescent stage in a small bulb in under fifteen minutes, which is definitely impressive for a small lab configuration that used around 100 pounds of mercury. For standard small bulbs, the ratio between the pump, receiver, and connections, and the reservoir R was about 1 to 20, and the levels of vacuum achieved were significantly high, though I can’t provide an exact or reliable measurement of how deep the vacuum was.

What impresses the investigator most in the course of these experiences is the behavior of gases when subjected to great rapidly alternating electrostatic stresses. But he must remain in doubt as to whether the effects observed are due wholly to the molecules, or atoms, of the gas which chemical analysis discloses to us, or whether there enters into play another medium of a gaseous nature, comprising atoms, or molecules, immersed in a fluid pervading the space. Such a medium surely must exist, and I am convinced that, for instance, even if air were absent, the surface and neighborhood of a body in space would be heated by rapidly alternating the potential of the body; but no such heating of the surface or neighborhood could occur if all free atoms were removed and only a homogeneous, incompressible, and elastic fluid—such as ether is supposed to be—would remain, for then there would be no impacts, no collisions. In such a case, as far as the body itself is concerned, only frictional losses in the inside could occur.

What impresses the investigator most during these experiences is how gases behave when exposed to intense, rapidly changing electrostatic stresses. However, he still questions whether the observed effects are entirely due to the gas molecules or atoms that chemical analysis reveals, or if there's another gaseous medium at play, made up of atoms or molecules suspended in a fluid that fills the space. This medium must exist, and I'm convinced that, for example, even if air were missing, the surface and surrounding area of a body in space would heat up by rapidly changing the body's potential. However, no heating of the surface or surrounding area would happen if all free atoms were removed and only a homogeneous, incompressible, and elastic fluid—like ether is thought to be—remained, because then there would be no impacts, no collisions. In that case, as far as the body itself is concerned, only internal frictional losses would occur.

It is a striking fact that the discharge through a gas is established with ever-increasing freedom as the frequency of the impulses is augmented. It behaves in this respect quite contrarily to a metallic conductor. In the latter the impedance enters prominently into play as the frequency is increased, but the gas acts much as a series of condensers would; the facility with which the discharge passes through, seems to depend on the rate of change of potential. If it acts so, then in a vacuum tube even[Pg 280] of great length, and no matter how strong the current, self-induction could not assert itself to any appreciable degree. We have, then, as far as we can now see, in the gas a conductor which is capable of transmitting electric impulses of any frequency which we may be able to produce. Could the frequency be brought high enough, then a queer system of electric distribution, which would be likely to interest gas companies, might be realized: metal pipes filled with gas—the metal being the insulator, the gas the conductor—supplying phosphorescent bulbs, or perhaps devices as yet uninvented. It is certainly possible to take a hollow core of copper, rarefy the gas in the same, and by passing impulses of sufficiently high frequency through a circuit around it, bring the gas inside to a high degree of incandescence; but as to the nature of the forces there would be considerable uncertainty, for it would be doubtful whether with such impulses the copper core would act as a static screen. Such paradoxes and apparent impossibilities we encounter at every step in this line of work, and therein lies, to a great extent, the charm of the study.

It's striking that the discharge through a gas becomes easier as the frequency of the impulses increases. This behavior is quite the opposite of what happens in a metal conductor. In the case of a metal conductor, impedance plays a significant role as the frequency rises, but gas behaves more like a series of capacitors; the ease with which the discharge occurs seems to depend on how quickly the potential changes. If that’s the case, then in a vacuum tube, even one that’s long and regardless of how strong the current is, self-induction wouldn't have a significant effect. So, as far as we can tell, gas acts as a conductor that can transmit electric impulses of any frequency we're able to generate. If we could increase the frequency enough, a strange system of electric distribution might be realized, which could intrigue gas companies: metal pipes filled with gas—the metal acts as the insulator, while the gas is the conductor—supplying phosphorescent bulbs or perhaps devices yet to be invented. It's certainly possible to take a hollow copper core, reduce the gas pressure inside it, and by applying sufficiently high frequency impulses through a surrounding circuit, bring the gas inside to a high level of brightness; but regarding the nature of the forces at play, there would be considerable uncertainty because it’s unclear whether the copper core would function as a static shield with such impulses. We encounter such paradoxes and apparent impossibilities at every turn in this field of work, and that's a big part of what makes the study so fascinating.

I have here a short and wide tube which is exhausted to a high degree and covered with a substantial coating of bronze, the coating barely allowing the light to shine through. A metallic cap, with a hook for suspending the tube, is fastened around the middle portion of the latter, the clasp being in contact with the bronze coating. I now want to light the gas inside by suspending the tube on a wire connected to the coil. Any one who would try the experiment for the first time, not having any previous experience, would probably take care to be quite alone when making the trial, for fear that he might become the joke of his assistants. Still, the bulb lights in spite of the metal coating, and the light can be distinctly perceived through the latter. A long tube covered with aluminum bronze lights when held in one hand—the other touching the terminal of the coil—quite powerfully. It might be objected that the coatings are not sufficiently conducting; still, even if they were highly resistant, they ought to screen the gas. They certainly screen it perfectly in a condition of rest, but far from perfectly when the charge is surging in the coating. But the loss of energy which occurs within the tube, notwithstanding the screen, is occasioned principally by the presence of the gas. Were we to take a large hollow metallic sphere and fill it with a perfect, incompressible, fluid dielectric, there would be no loss inside of the sphere, and[Pg 281] consequently the inside might be considered as perfectly screened, though the potential be very rapidly alternating. Even were the sphere filled with oil, the loss would be incomparably smaller than when the fluid is replaced by a gas, for in the latter case the force produces displacements; that means impact and collisions in the inside.

I have here a short, wide tube that's been highly evacuated and covered with a thick layer of bronze, which barely lets any light through. A metallic cap, complete with a hook for hanging the tube, is attached around the middle of it, and the clasp touches the bronze coating. I want to ignite the gas inside by hanging the tube from a wire linked to the coil. Anyone trying this experiment for the first time, without prior experience, would definitely want to be alone during the attempt, fearing they might become the laughingstock of their peers. Even so, the bulb lights up despite the metal coating, and the light can be clearly seen through it. A long tube coated with aluminum bronze lights up powerfully when held in one hand, while the other touches the terminal of the coil. Some might argue that the coatings aren’t conductive enough; however, even if they were highly resistant, they should still block the gas. They definitely block it effectively when at rest, but not as well when the charge is flowing through the coating. The energy loss inside the tube, despite the barrier, is mainly due to the gas. If we were to take a large hollow metal sphere and fill it with a perfect, incompressible fluid dielectric, there would be no loss inside the sphere, and thus the interior could be considered perfectly shielded, even with rapidly alternating potential. Even if the sphere were filled with oil, the loss would be significantly smaller than if the fluid were gas, because in the latter case, the force causes displacements, meaning impacts and collisions inside.

No matter what the pressure of the gas may be, it becomes an important factor in the heating of a conductor when the electric density is great and the frequency very high. That in the heating of conductors by lightning discharges, air is an element of great importance, is almost as certain as an experimental fact. I may illustrate the action of the air by the following experiment: I take a short tube which is exhausted to a moderate degree and has a platinum wire running through the middle from one end to the other. I pass a steady or low frequency current through the wire, and it is heated uniformly in all parts. The heating here is due to conduction, or frictional losses, and the gas around the wire has—as far as we can see—no function to perform. But now let me pass sudden discharges, or high frequency currents, through the wire. Again the wire is heated, this time principally on the ends and least in the middle portion; and if the frequency of the impulses, or the rate of change, is high enough, the wire might as well be cut in the middle as not, for practically all heating is due to the rarefied gas. Here the gas might only act as a conductor of no impedance diverting the current from the wire as the impedance of the latter is enormously increased, and merely heating the ends of the wire by reason of their resistance to the passage of the discharge. But it is not at all necessary that the gas in the tube should be conducting; it might be at an extremely low pressure, still the ends of the wire would be heated—as, however, is ascertained by experience—only the two ends would in such case not be electrically connected through the gaseous medium. Now what with these frequencies and potentials occurs in an exhausted tube, occurs in the lightning discharges at ordinary pressure. We only need remember one of the facts arrived at in the course of these investigations, namely, that to impulses of very high frequency the gas at ordinary pressure behaves much in the same manner as though it were at moderately low pressure. I think that in lightning discharges frequently wires or conducting objects are volatilized merely because air is present, and that, were the conductor im[Pg 282]mersed in an insulating liquid, it would be safe, for then the energy would have to spend itself somewhere else. From the behavior of gases under sudden impulses of high potential, I am led to conclude that there can be no surer way of diverting a lightning discharge than by affording it a passage through a volume of gas, if such a thing can be done in a practical manner.

No matter the pressure of the gas, it plays a key role in heating a conductor when the electric density is high and the frequency is very high. It's almost a given that air is a major factor in the heating of conductors caused by lightning discharges. I can demonstrate the effect of air with the following experiment: I take a short tube that's been moderately evacuated, and there's a platinum wire running through it from one end to the other. When I pass a steady or low-frequency current through the wire, it heats evenly. This heating happens due to conduction or frictional losses, and the gas surrounding the wire seems to have no role in it. But if I send sudden discharges or high-frequency currents through the wire, the heating occurs mostly at the ends and the middle gets the least heat; if the frequency of the impulses is high enough, it doesn't make a difference if the wire is cut in the middle—the heating is primarily due to the rarefied gas. In this case, the gas acts merely as a conductor with little resistance, channeling the current away from the wire, which experiences increased resistance, thereby heating just the ends due to their resistance to the discharge. However, the gas in the tube doesn't need to conduct electricity; it could be at a very low pressure, and still, the ends of the wire would get heated—experience shows that the two ends wouldn’t be electrically connected through the gas. What occurs with these frequencies and potentials in an evacuated tube also happens in lightning discharges at normal pressure. We only need to remember one fact from these studies: that to very high-frequency impulses, gas at normal pressure behaves similarly to gas at moderately low pressure. I believe that in lightning discharges, wires or conducting objects often vaporize simply because air is present, and if the conductor were immersed in an insulating liquid, it would be safe since the energy would have to go elsewhere. From observing how gases behave under sudden high-potential impulses, I've concluded that the best way to divert a lightning discharge is to guide it through a volume of gas, if it can be done practically.

There are two more features upon which I think it necessary to dwell in connection with these experiments—the "radiant state" and the "non-striking vacuum."

There are two more features that I think it's important to focus on regarding these experiments—the "radiant state" and the "non-striking vacuum."

Any one who has studied Crookes' work must have received the impression that the "radiant state" is a property of the gas inseparably connected with an extremely high degree of exhaustion. But it should be remembered that the phenomena observed in an exhausted vessel are limited to the character and capacity of the apparatus which is made use of. I think that in a bulb a molecule, or atom, does not precisely move in a straight line because it meets no obstacle, but because the velocity imparted to it is sufficient to propel it in a sensibly straight line. The mean free path is one thing, but the velocity—the energy associated with the moving body—is another, and under ordinary circumstances I believe that it is a mere question of potential or speed. A disruptive discharge coil, when the potential is pushed very far, excites phosphorescence and projects shadows, at comparatively low degrees of exhaustion. In a lightning discharge, matter moves in straight lines at ordinary pressure when the mean free path is exceedingly small, and frequently images of wires or other metallic objects have been produced by the particles thrown off in straight lines.

Anyone who has studied Crookes' work must have gotten the impression that the "radiant state" is a property of gas that is inextricably linked to a very high level of exhaustion. However, it's important to remember that the phenomena observed in an exhausted vessel are limited to the nature and capacity of the equipment used. I believe that in a bulb, a molecule or atom doesn’t move in a straight line solely because there are no obstacles, but because the speed it’s given is enough to keep it moving in a fairly straight line. The mean free path is one thing, but velocity—the energy associated with the moving object—is another. In normal conditions, I think it's just a matter of potential or speed. A disruptive discharge coil, when the potential is driven really high, can cause phosphorescence and create shadows, even at relatively low levels of exhaustion. In a lightning discharge, matter travels in straight lines at normal pressure when the mean free path is extremely small, and images of wires or other metallic objects are often produced by the particles moving in straight lines.

I have prepared a bulb to illustrate by an experiment the correctness of these assertions. In a globe L, Fig. 160, I have mounted upon a lamp filament f a piece of lime l. The lamp filament is connected with a wire which leads into the bulb, and the general construction of the latter is as indicated in Fig. 148, before described. The bulb being suspended from a wire connected to the terminal of the coil, and the latter being set to work, the lime piece l and the projecting parts of the filament f are bombarded. The degree of exhaustion is just such that with the potential the coil is capable of giving, phosphorescence of the glass is produced, but disappears as soon as the vacuum is impaired. The lime containing moisture, and moisture being given off as soon as heating occurs, the phosphorescence lasts only for[Pg 283] a few moments. When the lime has been sufficiently heated, enough moisture has been given off to impair materially the vacuum of the bulb. As the bombardment goes on, one point of the lime piece is more heated than other points, and the result is that finally practically all the discharge passes through that point which is intensely heated, and a white stream of lime particles (Fig. 160) then breaks forth from that point. This stream is composed of "radiant" matter, yet the degree of exhaustion is low. But the particles move in straight lines because the velocity imparted to them is great, and this is due to three causes—to the great electric density, the high temperature of the small point, and the fact that the particles of the lime are easily torn and thrown off—far more easily than those of carbon. With frequencies such as we are able to obtain, the particles are bodily thrown off and projected to a considerable distance; but with sufficiently high frequencies no such thing would occur; in such case only a stress would spread or a vibration would be propagated through the bulb. It would be out of the question to reach any such frequency on the assumption that the atoms move with the speed of light; but I believe that such a thing is impossible; for this an enormous potential would be required. With potentials which we are able to obtain, even with a disruptive discharge coil, the speed must be quite insignificant.

I have set up a bulb to demonstrate through an experiment the accuracy of these claims. In a globe L, Fig. 160, I’ve mounted a piece of lime l on a lamp filament f. The lamp filament is connected to a wire that leads into the bulb, and the overall setup of the bulb is as shown in Fig. 148, which was described earlier. The bulb is suspended from a wire connected to the terminal of the coil, and when the coil is activated, the lime piece l and the exposed parts of the filament f are bombarded. The level of vacuum is just right so that with the voltage the coil can provide, the glass glows, but this glow disappears as soon as the vacuum is compromised. Since the lime has moisture, and this moisture is released as it heats up, the glow lasts only for [Pg 283] a brief time. Once the lime is heated enough, enough moisture is released to significantly affect the vacuum in the bulb. As the bombardment continues, one spot on the lime gets hotter than the others, leading to the situation where almost all the discharge goes through that intensely heated spot, causing a bright stream of lime particles (Fig. 160) to erupt from there. This stream is made of "radiant" matter, yet the vacuum level is low. The particles travel in straight lines because they are given a lot of speed, which is caused by three factors—the high electric density, the intense heat of that small point, and the relative ease with which lime particles can be knocked off compared to carbon ones. At the frequencies we can achieve, the particles are forcefully ejected and projected a considerable distance; however, at sufficiently high frequencies, this wouldn’t happen; in that case, only pressure would spread or a vibration would travel through the bulb. It’s impossible to reach such a frequency assuming that atoms move at the speed of light; I believe that’s unfeasible because it would require an enormous amount of voltage. With the voltages we can generate, even with a disruptive discharge coil, the speed must be quite minimal.

Fig. 160. Fig. 160.

As to the "non-striking vacuum," the point to be noted is, that it can occur only with low frequency impulses, and it is[Pg 284] necessitated by the impossibility of carrying off enough energy with such impulses in high vacuum, since the few atoms which are around the terminal upon coming in contact with the same, are repelled and kept at a distance for a comparatively long period of time, and not enough work can be performed to render the effect perceptible to the eye. If the difference of potential between the terminals is raised, the dielectric breaks down. But with very high frequency impulses there is no necessity for such breaking down, since any amount of work can be performed by continually agitating the atoms in the exhausted vessel, provided the frequency is high enough. It is easy to reach—even with frequencies obtained from an alternator as here used—a stage at which the discharge does not pass between two electrodes in a narrow tube, each of these being connected to one of the terminals of the coil, but it is difficult to reach a point at which a luminous discharge would not occur around each electrode.

Regarding the "non-striking vacuum," it's important to note that it only happens with low-frequency impulses. This is because it's impossible to carry away enough energy with these impulses in a high vacuum. The few atoms surrounding the terminal get repelled and stay at a distance for a relatively long time, so not enough work can be done to make the effect visible. If the potential difference between the terminals increases, the dielectric breaks down. However, with very high-frequency impulses, there’s no need for this breakdown, as a significant amount of work can be done by continuously agitating the atoms in the exhausted vessel, as long as the frequency is high enough. It's straightforward to achieve a stage— even with frequencies generated from an alternator, like the one used here—where the discharge doesn't occur between two electrodes in a narrow tube, each connected to one of the coil's terminals. But it’s challenging to get to a point where a luminous discharge wouldn't happen around each electrode.

A thought which naturally presents itself in connection with high frequency currents, is to make use of their powerful electrodynamic inductive action to produce light effects in a sealed glass globe. The leading-in wire is one of the defects of the present incandescent lamp, and if no other improvement were made, that imperfection at least should be done away with. Following[Pg 285] this thought, I have carried on experiments in various directions, of which some were indicated in my former paper. I may here mention one or two more lines of experiment which have been followed up.

A thought that naturally comes to mind when discussing high-frequency currents is using their strong electrodynamic inductive action to create light effects in a sealed glass globe. The leading wire is one of the drawbacks of the current incandescent lamp, and even if no other improvements are made, we should at least eliminate that imperfection. Following this idea, I have conducted experiments in various areas, some of which I mentioned in my previous paper. Here, I’d like to highlight one or two additional lines of experimentation that I’ve pursued.

Many bulbs were constructed as shown in Fig. 161 and Fig. 162.

Many bulbs were designed as illustrated in Fig. 161 and Fig. 162.

Fig. 161, 162.
Fig. 161.Fig. 162.

In Fig. 161, a wide tube, T, was sealed to a smaller W shaped tube U, of phosphorescent glass. In the tube T, was placed a coil C, of aluminum wire, the ends of which were provided with small spheres, t and t1, of aluminum, and reached into the U tube. The tube T was slipped into a socket containing a primary coil, through which usually the discharges of Leyden jars were directed, and the rarefied gas in the small U tube was excited to strong luminosity by the high-tension current induced in the coil C. When Leyden jar discharges were used to induce currents in the coil C, it was found necessary to pack the tube T tightly with insulating powder, as a discharge would occur frequently between the turns of the coil, especially when the primary was thick and the air gap, through which the jars discharged, large, and no little trouble was experienced in this way.

In Fig. 161, a wide tube, T, was sealed to a smaller W shaped tube U, made of phosphorescent glass. Inside the tube T, there was a coil C made of aluminum wire, with small aluminum spheres, t and t1, at its ends, extending into the U tube. The tube T was inserted into a socket containing a primary coil, where discharges from Leyden jars were typically directed, and the rarefied gas in the small U tube was excited to a strong glow by the high-voltage current induced in the coil C. When Leyden jar discharges were used to induce currents in the coil C, it was necessary to tightly pack the tube T with insulating powder, since discharges frequently occurred between the turns of the coil, especially when the primary was thick and the air gap for the jars' discharge was large, causing a lot of trouble.

In Fig. 162 is illustrated another form of the bulb constructed. In this case a tube T is sealed to a globe L. The tube contains a coil C, the ends of which pass through two small glass tubes t and t1, which are sealed to the tube T. Two refractory buttons m and m1, are mounted on lamp filaments which are fastened to the ends of the wires passing through the glass tubes t and t1. Generally in bulbs made on this plan the globe L communicated with the tube T. For this purpose the ends of the small tubes t and t1 were heated just a trifle in the burner, merely to hold the wires, but not to interfere with the communication. The tube T, with the small tubes, wires through the same, and the refractory buttons m and m1, were first prepared, and then sealed to globe L, whereupon the coil C was slipped in and the connections made to its ends. The tube was then packed with insulating powder, jamming the latter as tight as possible up to very nearly the end; then it was closed and only a small hole left through which the remainder of the powder was introduced, and finally the end of the tube was closed. Usually in bulbs constructed as shown in Fig. 162 an aluminum tube a was fastened to the upper end s of each of the tubes t and t1 in order to protect that end against [Pg 286]the heat. The buttons m and m1 could be brought to any degree of incandescence by passing the discharges of Leyden jars around the coil C. In such bulbs with two buttons a very curious effect is produced by the formation of the shadows of each of the two buttons.

In Fig. 162, another type of bulb is shown. In this case, a tube T is sealed to a globe L. The tube contains a coil C, the ends of which pass through two small glass tubes t and t1, which are sealed to the tube T. Two refractory buttons m and m1 are attached to lamp filaments that are secured to the ends of the wires running through the glass tubes t and t1. Typically, in bulbs built this way, the globe L is connected to the tube T. For this, the ends of the small tubes t and t1 were heated slightly in the burner, just enough to hold the wires without obstructing the connection. The tube T, along with the small tubes, wires, and the refractory buttons m and m1, were prepared first and then sealed to the globe L. After that, the coil C was inserted, and the connections were made to its ends. The tube was then filled with insulating powder, packed as tightly as possible almost to the end; it was then closed with only a small hole left open through which the remaining powder was added, and finally, the end of the tube was sealed. Usually, in bulbs like the one shown in Fig. 162, an aluminum tube a was attached to the upper end s of each of the tubes t and t1 to protect that end from heat. The buttons m and m1 could be brightened to any level by passing discharges from Leyden jars around the coil C. In these bulbs with two buttons, a very interesting effect occurs from the shadows created by each of the buttons.

Another line of experiment, which has been assiduously followed, was to induce by electro-dynamic induction a current or luminous discharge in an exhausted tube or bulb. This matter has received such able treatment at the hands of Prof. J. J. Thomson, that I could add but little to what he has made known, even had I made it the special subject of this lecture. Still, since experiments in this line have gradually led me to the present views and results, a few words must be devoted here to this subject.

Another area of research that has been diligently pursued is inducing a current or light discharge in an evacuated tube or bulb through electro-dynamic induction. This topic has been expertly addressed by Prof. J. J. Thomson, so I could add very little to what he has already presented, even if I had made it the main focus of this lecture. However, since my experiments in this area have gradually shaped my current views and findings, I need to say a few words about it here.

It has occurred, no doubt, to many that as a vacuum tube is made longer, the electromotive force per unit length of the tube, necessary to pass a luminous discharge through the latter, becomes continually smaller; therefore, if the exhausted tube be made long enough, even with low frequencies a luminous discharge could be induced in such a tube closed upon itself. Such a tube might be placed around a hall or on a ceiling, and at once a simple appliance capable of giving considerable light would be obtained. But this would be an appliance hard to manufacture and extremely unmanageable. It would not do to make the tube up of small lengths, because there would be with ordinary frequencies considerable loss in the coatings, and besides, if coatings were used, it would be better to supply the current directly to the tube by connecting the coatings to a transformer. But even if all objections of such nature were removed, with low frequencies the light conversion itself would be inefficient, as I have before stated. In using extremely high frequencies the length of the secondary—in other words, the size of the vessel—can be reduced as much as desired, and the efficiency of the light conversion is increased, provided that means are invented for efficiently obtaining such high frequencies. Thus one is led, from theoretical and practical considerations, to the use of high frequencies, and this means high electromotive forces and small currents in the primary. When one works with condenser charges—and they are the only means up to the present known for reaching these extreme frequencies—one gets to electromotive forces of several thousands of volts per turn of the primary. We cannot multiply the electro-dynamic inductive effect by taking[Pg 287] more turns in the primary, for we arrive at the conclusion that the best way is to work with one single turn—though we must sometimes depart from this rule—and we must get along with whatever inductive effect we can obtain with one turn. But before one has long experimented with the extreme frequencies required to set up in a small bulb an electromotive force of several thousands of volts, one realizes the great importance of electrostatic effects, and these effects grow relatively to the electro-dynamic in significance as the frequency is increased.

It’s likely that many have noticed that as a vacuum tube gets longer, the voltage needed per unit length to create a visible discharge through it becomes smaller. So, if the tube is long enough, even at low frequencies, a visible discharge could be created in a tube that’s closed on itself. Such a tube could be placed around a hall or on a ceiling, providing a simple device capable of producing significant light. However, this would be difficult to manufacture and quite unwieldy. It wouldn’t be practical to build the tube with short segments because there would be significant loss in the coatings at typical frequencies, and if coatings were used, it would be better to connect them directly to a transformer to supply the current. Yet even if we addressed these issues, light conversion would still be inefficient at low frequencies, as I mentioned before. By using extremely high frequencies, the secondary length – or the size of the vessel – can be minimized, which improves light conversion efficiency, assuming we can find a way to efficiently achieve such high frequencies. This leads us to favor high frequencies, which means high voltages and low currents in the primary. When using capacitor charges – currently the only method known to reach these extreme frequencies – we can achieve voltages of several thousand volts per turn of the primary. We can’t increase the electro-dynamic inductive effect by adding more turns to the primary; we conclude that the best approach is usually to work with just one turn, although we might occasionally need to deviate from this approach. We must rely on whatever inductive effect we can get with one turn. However, after experimenting for a long time with the extreme frequencies necessary to generate several thousand volts in a small bulb, the importance of electrostatic effects becomes clear, and these effects grow in significance relative to the electro-dynamic effects as the frequency increases.

Now, if anything is desirable in this case, it is to increase the frequency, and this would make it still worse for the electrodynamic effects. On the other hand, it is easy to exalt the electrostatic action as far as one likes by taking more turns on the secondary, or combining self-induction and capacity to raise the potential. It should also be remembered that, in reducing the current to the smallest value and increasing the potential, the electric impulses of high frequency can be more easily transmitted through a conductor.

Now, if there's anything desirable in this situation, it's to increase the frequency, which would only worsen the electrodynamic effects. On the flip side, it's straightforward to boost the electrostatic action as much as desired by adding more turns on the secondary or combining self-induction and capacitance to raise the potential. It's also important to note that by reducing the current to the lowest value and increasing the potential, high-frequency electric impulses can be transmitted more easily through a conductor.

These and similar thoughts determined me to devote more attention to the electrostatic phenomena, and to endeavor to produce potentials as high as possible, and alternating as fast as they could be made to alternate. I then found that I could excite vacuum tubes at considerable distance from a conductor connected to a properly constructed coil, and that I could, by converting the oscillatory current of a conductor to a higher potential, establish electrostatic alternating fields which acted through the whole extent of the room, lighting up a tube no matter where it was held in space. I thought I recognized that I had made a step in advance, and I have persevered in this line; but I wish to say that I share with all lovers of science and progress the one and only desire—to reach a result of utility to men in any direction to which thought or experiment may lead me. I think that this departure is the right one, for I cannot see, from the observation of the phenomena which manifest themselves as the frequency is increased, what there would remain to act between two circuits conveying, for instance, impulses of several hundred millions per second, except electrostatic forces. Even with such trifling frequencies the energy would be practically all potential, and my conviction has grown strong that, to whatever kind of motion light may be due, it is produced by tremendous electrostatic stresses vibrating with extreme rapidity.[Pg 288]

These thoughts led me to focus more on electrostatic phenomena and to try to produce the highest possible potentials and the fastest alternating currents. I discovered that I could excite vacuum tubes from a considerable distance using a conductor connected to a well-designed coil. By raising the oscillatory current of a conductor to a higher potential, I was able to create electrostatic alternating fields that filled the entire room, illuminating a tube regardless of where it was held. I believed I had made progress and I continued down this path; however, I want to express that, like all science and progress enthusiasts, I share the singular goal of achieving results that are beneficial to humanity in any direction that thought or experimentation may take me. I feel confident that this approach is correct, as I cannot discern, from observing the phenomena manifesting at higher frequencies, what would remain to interact between two circuits transmitting, for example, impulses of several hundred million per second, other than electrostatic forces. Even at such low frequencies, the energy would be almost entirely potential, and my belief has grown stronger that, regardless of the type of motion that light might be associated with, it is generated by immense electrostatic stresses vibrating at incredibly high speeds.[Pg 288]

Fig. 163, 164.
Fig. 163.Fig. 164.

Of all these phenomena observed with currents, or electric impulses, of high frequency, the most fascinating for an audience are certainly those which are noted in an electrostatic field acting through considerable distance; and the best an unskilled lecturer can do is to begin and finish with the exhibition of these singular effects. I take a tube in my hand and move it about, and it is lighted wherever I may hold it; throughout space the invisible forces act. But I may take another tube and it might not light, the vacuum being very high. I excite it by means of a disruptive discharge coil, and now it will light in the electrostatic field. I may put it away for a few weeks or months, still it retains the faculty of being excited. What change have I produced in the tube in the act of exciting it? If a motion imparted to atoms, it is difficult to perceive how it can persist so long without being arrested by frictional losses; and if a strain exerted in the dielectric, such as a simple electrification would produce, it is easy to see how it may persist indefinitely, but very difficult to understand why such a condition should aid the excitation when we have to deal with potentials which are rapidly alternating.[Pg 289]

Of all the phenomena observed with high-frequency currents or electric impulses, the most captivating for an audience are definitely those seen in an electrostatic field acting over a significant distance. The best an inexperienced lecturer can do is to start and end with demonstrations of these unique effects. I take a tube in my hand and move it around, and it lights up no matter where I hold it; the invisible forces are at work throughout the space. However, if I take another tube, it might not light up because the vacuum is very high. I excite it using a disruptive discharge coil, and now it lights up in the electrostatic field. I can put it away for a few weeks or months, and it still retains the ability to be excited. What change have I made in the tube while exciting it? If the motion imparted to atoms, it's hard to see how it can last so long without being stopped by frictional losses; and if a strain is exerted in the dielectric, as simple electrification would cause, it's easy to see how it could persist indefinitely. However, it's quite difficult to understand why such a condition would help the excitation when we're dealing with rapidly alternating potentials.[Pg 289]

Since I have exhibited these phenomena for the first time, I have obtained some other interesting effects. For instance, I have produced the incandescence of a button, filament, or wire enclosed in a tube. To get to this result it was necessary to economize the energy which is obtained from the field, and direct most of it on the small body to be rendered incandescent. At the beginning the task appeared difficult, but the experiences gathered permitted me to reach the result easily. In Fig. 163 and Fig. 164, two such tubes are illustrated, which are prepared for the occasion. In Fig. 163 a short tube T1, sealed to another long tube T, is provided with a stem s, with a platinum wire sealed in the latter. A very thin lamp filament l, is fastened to this wire and connection to the outside is made through a thin copper wire w. The tube is provided with outside and inside coatings, C and C1, respectively, and is filled as far as the coatings reach with conducting, and the space above with insulating, powder. These coatings are merely used to enable me to perform two experiments with the tube—namely, to produce the effect desired either by direct connection of the body of the experimenter or of another body to the wire w, or by acting inductively through the glass. The stem s is provided with an aluminum tube a, for purposes before explained, and only a small part of the filament reaches out of this tube. By holding the tube T1 anywhere in the electrostatic field, the filament is rendered incandescent.

Since I first showed these phenomena, I've discovered some other interesting effects. For example, I generated the glow of a button, filament, or wire inside a tube. To achieve this, I needed to save the energy collected from the field and direct most of it to the small object I wanted to make glow. At first, this seemed challenging, but the experiences I gathered made it easier to achieve the result. In Fig. 163 and Fig. 164, you can see two such tubes that were prepared for this purpose. In Fig. 163, there’s a short tube T1 sealed to a longer tube T, equipped with a stem s that has a platinum wire sealed in it. A very thin lamp filament l is attached to this wire, and a connection to the outside is made through a thin copper wire w. The tube has outer and inner coatings, C and C1, respectively, and is filled with conductive powder up to the coatings and with insulating powder above that. These coatings are simply used to let me perform two experiments with the tube—specifically, to create the desired effect either by directly connecting the body of the experimenter or another object to the wire w, or by acting inductively through the glass. The stem s has an aluminum tube a for the purposes mentioned earlier, and only a small part of the filament extends out of this tube. By holding the tube T1 anywhere in the electrostatic field, the filament glows.

A more interesting piece of apparatus is illustrated in Fig. 164. The construction is the same as before, only instead of the lamp filament a small platinum wire p, sealed in a stem s, and bent above it in a circle, is connected to the copper wire w, which is joined to an inside coating C. A small stem s1 is provided with a needle, on the point of which is arranged, to rotate very freely, a very light fan of mica v. To prevent the fan from falling out, a thin stem of glass g, is bent properly and fastened to the aluminum tube. When the glass tube is held anywhere in the electrostatic field the platinum wire becomes incandescent, and the mica vanes are rotated very fast.

A more interesting piece of equipment is shown in Fig. 164. Its construction is the same as before, but instead of a lamp filament, there’s a small platinum wire p, sealed in a stem s and bent above it in a circle, connected to the copper wire w, which is linked to an inner coating C. A small stem s1 has a needle, on the tip of which is attached a very lightweight fan made of mica v, designed to rotate freely. To keep the fan from falling out, a thin glass stem g is properly bent and secured to the aluminum tube. When the glass tube is placed anywhere in the electrostatic field, the platinum wire glows, and the mica vanes spin very quickly.

Intense phosphorescence may be excited in a bulb by merely connecting it to a plate within the field, and the plate need not be any larger than an ordinary lamp shade. The phosphorescence excited with these currents is incomparably more powerful than with ordinary apparatus. A small phosphorescent bulb, when attached to a wire connected to a coil, emits sufficient light[Pg 290] to allow reading ordinary print at a distance of five to six paces. It was of interest to see how some of the phosphorescent bulbs of Professor Crookes would behave with these currents, and he has had the kindness to lend me a few for the occasion. The effects produced are magnificent, especially by the sulphide of calcium and sulphide of zinc. With the disruptive discharge coil they glow intensely merely by holding them in the hand and connecting the body to the terminal of the coil.

Intense phosphorescence can be activated in a bulb just by connecting it to a plate within the field, and the plate doesn't need to be any bigger than a regular lampshade. The phosphorescence generated by these currents is way more powerful than with standard equipment. A small phosphorescent bulb, when hooked up to a wire connected to a coil, gives off enough light[Pg 290] to read regular print from five to six paces away. It was fascinating to see how some of Professor Crookes' phosphorescent bulbs would respond to these currents, and he kindly lent me a few for the occasion. The effects are stunning, particularly with calcium sulfide and zinc sulfide. With the disruptive discharge coil, they glow brightly just by holding them in your hand and connecting your body to the terminal of the coil.

To whatever results investigations of this kind may lead, the chief interest lies, for the present, in the possibilities they offer for the production of an efficient illuminating device. In no branch of electric industry is an advance more desired than in the manufacture of light. Every thinker, when considering the barbarous methods employed, the deplorable losses incurred in our best systems of light production, must have asked himself, What is likely to be the light of the future? Is it to be an incandescent solid, as in the present lamp, or an incandescent gas, or a phosphorescent body, or something like a burner, but incomparably more efficient?

No matter where investigations like these might lead, the main interest right now is in the potential they hold for creating a more effective lighting device. There's no area of the electrical industry where progress is more needed than in lighting production. Every thinker, when considering the outdated methods used and the significant losses from our current best lighting systems, must have wondered, What will the future of light be? Will it be a solid incandescent like our current bulbs, or an incandescent gas, or a phosphorescent material, or something like a burner that's much more efficient?

There is little chance to perfect a gas burner; not, perhaps, because human ingenuity has been bent upon that problem for centuries without a radical departure having been made—though the argument is not devoid of force—but because in a burner the highest vibrations can never be reached, except by passing through all the low ones. For how is a flame to proceed unless by a fall of lifted weights? Such process cannot be maintained without renewal, and renewal is repeated passing from low to high vibrations. One way only seems to be open to improve a burner, and that is by trying to reach higher degrees of incandescence. Higher incandescence is equivalent to a quicker vibration: that means more light from the same material, and that again, means more economy. In this direction some improvements have been made, but the progress is hampered by many limitations. Discarding, then, the burner, there remains the three ways first mentioned, which are essentially electrical.

It's unlikely that a gas burner will ever be perfected; not necessarily because people haven't been trying to solve this issue for centuries without any major breakthroughs—though that's a valid point—but because a burner can't achieve its highest vibrations without first going through all the lower ones. After all, how can a flame rise without a drop in lifted weights? This process can’t be sustained without renewal, and renewal means moving from low to high vibrations repeatedly. The only real way to improve a burner seems to be by aiming for higher levels of brightness. Higher brightness equates to faster vibrations: that means more light from the same material, which also means more efficiency. Some progress has been made in this area, but many limitations hold it back. So, setting aside the burner, we are left with the three previously mentioned approaches, which are fundamentally electrical.

Suppose the light of the immediate future to be a solid, rendered incandescent by electricity. Would it not seem that it is better to employ a small button than a frail filament? From many considerations it certainly must be concluded that a button is capable of a higher economy, assuming, of course, the difficulties connected with the operation of such a lamp to be effec[Pg 291]tively overcome. But to light such a lamp we require a high potential; and to get this economically, we must use high frequencies.

Imagine that the light of the near future is a solid source, glowing thanks to electricity. Wouldn’t it make more sense to use a small button instead of a fragile filament? Based on various factors, it’s clear that a button could be more efficient, as long as we can effectively address the challenges of operating such a lamp. However, to power this lamp, we need a high voltage; and to achieve this in a cost-effective way, we should utilize high frequencies.

Such considerations apply even more to the production of light by the incandescence of a gas, or by phosphorescence. In all cases we require high frequencies and high potentials. These thoughts occurred to me a long time ago.

Such thoughts are even more relevant to how we produce light through gas incandescence or phosphorescence. In every case, we need high frequencies and high potentials. I had these ideas quite a while back.

Incidentally we gain, by the use of high frequencies, many advantages, such as higher economy in the light production, the possibility of working with one lead, the possibility of doing away with the leading-in wire, etc.

Incidentally, by using high frequencies, we gain several advantages, such as greater efficiency in light production, the ability to work with just one lead, and the option to eliminate the leading-in wire, among others.

The question is, how far can we go with frequencies? Ordinary conductors rapidly lose the facility of transmitting electric impulses when the frequency is greatly increased. Assume the means for the production of impulses of very great frequency brought to the utmost perfection, every one will naturally ask how to transmit them when the necessity arises. In transmitting such impulses through conductors we must remember that we have to deal with pressure and flow, in the ordinary interpretation of these terms. Let the pressure increase to an enormous value, and let the flow correspondingly diminish, then such impulses—variations merely of pressure, as it were—can no doubt be transmitted through a wire even if their frequency be many hundreds of millions per second. It would, of course, be out of question to transmit such impulses through a wire immersed in a gaseous medium, even if the wire were provided with a thick and excellent insulation, for most of the energy would be lost in molecular bombardment and consequent heating. The end of the wire connected to the source would be heated, and the remote end would receive but a trifling part of the energy supplied. The prime necessity, then, if such electric impulses are to be used, is to find means to reduce as much as possible the dissipation.

The question is, how far can we push frequencies? Regular conductors quickly lose their ability to transmit electric impulses when the frequency is significantly increased. Assuming we have the technology to create very high-frequency impulses at the highest level of perfection, everyone will naturally wonder how to transmit them when needed. When transmitting these impulses through conductors, we need to consider pressure and flow, in their usual sense. If the pressure increases to an enormous level and the flow decreases accordingly, then these impulses—essentially just variations in pressure—can definitely be transmitted through a wire even if their frequency is in the hundreds of millions per second. Of course, it would be impossible to transmit such impulses through a wire surrounded by a gaseous medium, even if the wire had thick and great insulation, because most of the energy would be lost due to molecular collisions and resulting heat. The end of the wire connected to the source would get hot, while the far end would receive only a tiny portion of the energy provided. Therefore, the main requirement for using such electric impulses is to find ways to minimize energy loss as much as possible.

The first thought is, to employ the thinnest possible wire surrounded by the thickest practicable insulation. The next thought is to employ electrostatic screens. The insulation of the wire may be covered with a thin conducting coating and the latter connected to the ground. But this would not do, as then all the energy would pass through the conducting coating to the ground and nothing would get to the end of the wire. If a ground connection is made it can only be made through a conductor offer[Pg 292]ing an enormous impedance, or through a condenser of extremely small capacity. This, however, does not do away with other difficulties.

The first idea is to use the thinnest wire possible, wrapped in the thickest insulation that can be managed. The next idea is to use electrostatic screens. The insulation on the wire could be covered with a thin conductive layer connected to the ground. However, this wouldn’t work because all the energy would just flow through the conductive layer to the ground, and nothing would reach the end of the wire. If a ground connection is made, it can only be done through a conductor that offers a huge impedance, or through a capacitor with an extremely small capacity. However, this doesn't solve other problems.

If the wave length of the impulses is much smaller than the length of the wire, then corresponding short waves will be set up in the conducting coating, and it will be more or less the same as though the coating were directly connected to earth. It is therefore necessary to cut up the coating in sections much shorter than the wave length. Such an arrangement does not still afford a perfect screen, but it is ten thousand times better than none. I think it preferable to cut up the conducting coating in small sections, even if the current waves be much longer than the coating.

If the wavelength of the impulses is much shorter than the length of the wire, then corresponding short waves will be generated in the conducting coating, effectively making it almost like the coating is directly grounded. Therefore, it's important to divide the coating into sections that are much shorter than the wavelength. This setup doesn’t provide a perfect shield, but it’s ten thousand times better than having none at all. I believe it's better to segment the conducting coating into small sections, even if the current waves are much longer than the coating.

If a wire were provided with a perfect electrostatic screen, it would be the same as though all objects were removed from it at infinite distance. The capacity would then be reduced to the capacity of the wire itself, which would be very small. It would then be possible to send over the wire current vibrations of very high frequencies at enormous distances, without affecting greatly the character of the vibrations. A perfect screen is of course out of the question, but I believe that with a screen such as I have just described telephony could be rendered practicable across the Atlantic. According to my ideas, the gutta-percha covered wire should be provided with a third conducting coating subdivided in sections. On the top of this should be again placed a layer of gutta-percha and other insulation, and on the top of the whole the armor. But such cables will not be constructed, for ere long intelligence—transmitted without wires—will throb through the earth like a pulse through a living organism. The wonder is that, with the present state of knowledge and the experiences gained, no attempt is being made to disturb the electrostatic or magnetic condition of the earth, and transmit, if nothing else, intelligence.

If a wire had a perfect electrostatic shield, it would be like all objects were removed from it at an infinite distance. The capacity would then be reduced to just the capacity of the wire itself, which would be very small. This would allow for sending current vibrations of very high frequencies over long distances without significantly altering the nature of the vibrations. A perfect shield is obviously impossible, but I believe that with a screen like I just described, transatlantic telephony could become feasible. In my view, the gutta-percha covered wire should have a third conducting layer divided into sections. On top of that, there should be another layer of gutta-percha and other insulation, finished off with armor. However, such cables won't be made, because soon, intelligence—transmitted wirelessly—will pulse through the earth like a heartbeat in a living organism. It's surprising that, given our current knowledge and experiences, no effort is being made to disrupt the earth's electrostatic or magnetic conditions to transmit information, if nothing else.

It has been my chief aim in presenting these results to point out phenomena or features of novelty, and to advance ideas which I am hopeful will serve as starting points of new departures. It has been my chief desire this evening to entertain you with some novel experiments. Your applause, so frequently and generously accorded, has told me that I have succeeded.

My main goal in sharing these results has been to highlight interesting new phenomena or features and to propose ideas that I hope will inspire new directions. Tonight, I really wanted to entertain you with some innovative experiments. Your frequent and generous applause has shown me that I've succeeded.

In conclusion, let me thank you most heartily for your kindness and attention, and assure you that the honor I have had in[Pg 293] addressing such a distinguished audience, the pleasure I have had in presenting these results to a gathering of so many able men—and among them also some of those in whose work for many years past I have found enlightenment and constant pleasure—I shall never forget.

In conclusion, I want to sincerely thank you for your kindness and attention. I assure you that I will never forget the honor of addressing such a distinguished audience, the pleasure of sharing these results with so many talented individuals—and among them, some whose work I have found enlightening and enjoyable for many years.


CHAPTER XXVIII.

On Light and Other High-Frequency Phenomena.[3]

INTRODUCTORY.—SOME THOUGHTS ON THE EYE.

When we look at the world around us, on Nature, we are impressed with its beauty and grandeur. Each thing we perceive, though it may be vanishingly small, is in itself a world, that is, like the whole of the universe, matter and force governed by law,—a world, the contemplation of which fills us with feelings of wonder and irresistibly urges us to ceaseless thought and inquiry. But in all this vast world, of all objects our senses reveal to us, the most marvellous, the most appealing to our imagination, appears no doubt a highly developed organism, a thinking being. If there is anything fitted to make us admire Nature's handiwork, it is certainly this inconceivable structure, which performs its innumerable motions of obedience to external influence. To understand its workings, to get a deeper insight into this Nature's masterpiece, has ever been for thinkers a fascinating aim, and after many centuries of arduous research men have arrived at a fair understanding of the functions of its organs and senses. Again, in all the perfect harmony of its parts, of the parts which constitute the material or tangible of our being, of all its organs and senses, the eye is the most wonderful. It is the most precious, the most indispensable of our perceptive or directive organs, it is the great gateway through which all knowledge enters the mind. Of all our organs, it is the one, which is in the [Pg 295]most intimate relation with that which we call intellect. So intimate is this relation, that it is often said, the very soul shows itself in the eye.

When we look at the world around us, at Nature, we are struck by its beauty and grandeur. Each thing we observe, no matter how tiny, is in itself a world; like the entire universe, it consists of matter and energy governed by laws—a world that fills us with wonder and compels us to think and inquire endlessly. But among all the vastness of this world and all the objects our senses reveal, the most extraordinary, the most captivating to our imagination, is undoubtedly a highly developed organism, a thinking being. If there’s anything that inspires us to admire Nature's craftsmanship, it's this incredible structure, which carries out countless movements in response to external forces. Understanding how it works, gaining deeper insight into this masterpiece of Nature, has always been a fascinating goal for thinkers, and after centuries of intense research, people have gained a solid understanding of the functions of its organs and senses. Again, in the perfect harmony of its components—those that make up our physical being— the eye stands out as the most remarkable. It is the most precious and essential of our perceptive or guiding organs; it serves as the major gateway through which all knowledge enters the mind. Of all our organs, it has the closest connection with what we refer to as intellect. This connection is so profound that it's often said that the very soul is reflected in the eye.

It can be taken as a fact, which the theory of the action of the eye implies, that for each external impression, that is, for each image produced upon the retina, the ends of the visual nerves, concerned in the conveyance of the impression to the mind, must be under a peculiar stress or in a vibratory state. It now does not seem improbable that, when by the power of thought an image is evoked, a distinct reflex action, no matter how weak, is exerted upon certain ends of the visual nerves, and therefore upon the retina. Will it ever be within human power to analyze the condition of the retina when disturbed by thought or reflex action, by the help of some optical or other means of such sensitiveness, that a clear idea of its state might be gained at any time? If this were possible, then the problem of reading one's thoughts with precision, like the characters of an open book, might be much easier to solve than many problems belonging to the domain of positive physical science, in the solution of which many, if not the majority, of scientific men implicitly believe. Helmholtz, has shown that the fundi of the eye are themselves, luminous, and he was able to see, in total darkness, the movement of his arm by the light of his own eyes. This is one of the most remarkable experiments recorded in the history of science, and probably only a few men could satisfactorily repeat it, for it is very likely, that the luminosity of the eyes is associated with uncommon activity of the brain and great imaginative power. It is fluorescence of brain action, as it were.

It can be taken as a fact, as suggested by the theory of how the eye works, that for every external impression, meaning each image that appears on the retina, the ends of the visual nerves that carry that impression to the mind must be under specific stress or in a state of vibration. It now seems possible that when a thought brings forth an image, there is a distinct reflex action, regardless of how weak, on certain ends of the visual nerves, and thus on the retina. Will humans ever be able to analyze the condition of the retina when it's affected by thought or reflex action, using some optical or other means so sensitive that we could clearly understand its state at any moment? If this were achievable, then the challenge of accurately reading one’s thoughts, as easily as reading the words in a book, might be simpler to tackle than many challenges in the field of physical science, which many, if not most, scientists believe in deeply. Helmholtz has shown that the eye itself emits light, and he was able to see the movement of his arm in complete darkness by the light from his own eyes. This is one of the most remarkable experiments documented in the history of science, and likely only a few individuals could replicate it satisfactorily, as it's probable that the light emitted by the eyes is linked to exceptional brain activity and enhanced imaginative ability. It's a kind of fluorescence of brain activity, so to speak.

Another fact having a bearing on this subject which has probably been noted by many, since it is stated in popular expressions, but which I cannot recollect to have found chronicled as a positive result of observation is, that at times, when a sudden idea or image presents itself to the intellect, there is a distinct and sometimes painful sensation of luminosity produced in the eye, observable even in broad daylight.

Another fact related to this topic that many have likely noticed, as it is mentioned in common expressions, but which I don’t recall seeing recorded as a confirmed observation, is that at times when a sudden idea or image comes to mind, there is a clear and sometimes uncomfortable feeling of brightness in the eye, noticeable even in broad daylight.

The saying then, that the soul shows itself in the eye, is deeply founded, and we feel that it expresses a great truth. It has a profound meaning even for one who, like a poet or artist, only following his inborn instinct or love for Nature, finds delight in aimless thoughts and in the mere contemplation of natural phenomena, but a still more profound meaning for one who, in the [Pg 296]spirit of positive scientific investigation, seeks to ascertain the causes of the effects. It is principally the natural philosopher, the physicist, for whom the eye is the subject of the most intense admiration.

The saying that the soul reveals itself in the eye is truly profound, and we recognize that it conveys an important truth. It holds deep meaning even for those like poets or artists, who, driven by their natural instincts or love for Nature, find joy in wandering thoughts and simply observing natural phenomena. However, it carries an even deeper significance for those who, with a spirit of scientific inquiry, strive to understand the reasons behind these effects. It is mainly the natural philosopher, the physicist, for whom the eye becomes a source of the greatest admiration.

Two facts about the eye must forcibly impress the mind of the physicist, notwithstanding he may think or say that it is an imperfect optical instrument, forgetting, that the very conception of that which is perfect or seems so to him, has been gained through this same instrument. First, the eye is, as far as our positive knowledge goes, the only organ which is directly affected by that subtile medium, which as science teaches us, must fill all space; secondly, it is the most sensitive of our organs, incomparably more sensitive to external impressions than any other.

Two facts about the eye should strongly impress upon the physicist, even if he believes or claims that it’s an imperfect optical instrument, overlooking that the very idea of perfection, or what seems perfect to him, has been formed through this same instrument. First, the eye is, as far as our current understanding goes, the only organ that is directly affected by that subtle medium which science teaches must fill all space; second, it is the most sensitive of our organs, far more responsive to external stimuli than any other.

The organ of hearing implies the impact of ponderable bodies, the organ of smell the transference of detached material particles, and the organs of taste, and of touch or force, the direct contact, or at least some interference of ponderable matter, and this is true even in those instances of animal organisms, in which some of these organs are developed to a degree of truly marvelous perfection. This being so, it seems wonderful that the organ of sight solely should be capable of being stirred by that, which all our other organs are powerless to detect, yet which plays an essential part in all natural phenomena, which transmits all energy and sustains all motion and, that most intricate of all, life, but which has properties such that even a scientifically trained mind cannot help drawing a distinction between it and all that is called matter. Considering merely this, and the fact that the eye, by its marvelous power, widens our otherwise very narrow range of perception far beyond the limits of the small world which is our own, to embrace myriads of other worlds, suns and stars in the infinite depths of the universe, would make it justifiable to assert, that it is an organ of a higher order. Its performances are beyond comprehension. Nature as far as we know never produced anything more wonderful. We can get barely a faint idea of its prodigious power by analyzing what it does and by comparing. When ether waves impinge upon the human body, they produce the sensations of warmth or cold, pleasure or pain, or perhaps other sensations of which we are not aware, and any degree or intensity of these sensations, which degrees are infinite in number, hence an infinite number of distinct sensations. But our sense of touch, or our sense of force, cannot reveal to us these differences in degree[Pg 297] or intensity, unless they are very great. Now we can readily conceive how an organism, such as the human, in the eternal process of evolution, or more philosophically speaking, adaptation to Nature, being constrained to the use of only the sense of touch or force, for instance, might develop this sense to such a degree of sensitiveness or perfection, that it would be capable of distinguishing the minutest differences in the temperature of a body even at some distance, to a hundredth, or thousandth, or millionth part of a degree. Yet, even this apparently impossible performance would not begin to compare with that of the eye, which is capable of distinguishing and conveying to the mind in a single instant innumerable peculiarities of the body, be it in form, or color, or other respects. This power of the eye rests upon two things, namely, the rectilinear propagation of the disturbance by which it is effected, and upon its sensitiveness. To say that the eye is sensitive is not saying anything. Compared with it, all other organs are monstrously crude. The organ of smell which guides a dog on the trail of a deer, the organ of touch or force which guides an insect in its wanderings, the organ of hearing, which is affected by the slightest disturbances of the air, are sensitive organs, to be sure, but what are they compared with the human eye! No doubt it responds to the faintest echoes or reverberations of the medium; no doubt, it brings us tidings from other worlds, infinitely remote, but in a language we cannot as yet always understand. And why not? Because we live in a medium filled with air and other gases, vapors and a dense mass of solid particles flying about. These play an important part in many phenomena; they fritter away the energy of the vibrations before they can reach the eye; they too, are the carriers of germs of destruction, they get into our lungs and other organs, clog up the channels and imperceptibly, yet inevitably, arrest the stream of life. Could we but do away with all ponderable matter in the line of sight of the telescope, it would reveal to us undreamt of marvels. Even the unaided eye, I think, would be capable of distinguishing in the pure medium, small objects at distances measured probably by hundreds or perhaps thousands of miles.

The organ of hearing depends on the impact of tangible objects, the organ of smell relies on the transfer of separate material particles, and the organs of taste and touch involve direct contact, or at least some interaction with tangible matter. This is true even in cases where these organs in animals are developed to a remarkable degree. Given this, it's amazing that the organ of sight can be stimulated by something that our other senses can't perceive, yet which plays a critical role in all natural phenomena, transmitting energy and sustaining all motion and, the most complex of all, life. Its properties are such that even a scientifically trained mind feels a need to distinguish it from what we categorize as matter. Just considering this, along with the fact that our eyes remarkably expand our otherwise limited perception to encompass countless other worlds, suns, and stars in the universe’s vast depths, supports the idea that it’s an organ of a higher order. Its functions are beyond comprehension. As far as we know, nature has never created anything more astonishing. We can barely grasp its incredible power by analyzing its actions and making comparisons. When ether waves hit the human body, they create sensations of warmth or cold, pleasure or pain, or possibly other sensations we aren't even aware of, resulting in an infinite range of these sensations in different degrees or intensities. However, our sense of touch or force can't reveal these subtle differences unless they are pronounced. We can easily imagine how a human organism, evolving over time—or more philosophically, adapting to nature—might refine its sense of touch or force to such an exquisite degree that it could detect minute temperature changes even from a distance, down to a hundredth, thousandth, or millionth of a degree. Yet, even this remarkable ability doesn’t come close to what the eye can do, which can identify and transmit countless details about a body’s form, color, or other characteristics to the mind in an instant. The eye's power relies on two factors: the straight-line propagation of the disturbance that activates it and its sensitivity. Claiming that the eye is sensitive doesn't convey much; compared to it, all other organs seem incredibly crude. The dog’s sense of smell that tracks a deer, the touch or force sense guiding an insect, and the ear, responsive to the faintest air disturbances, are certainly sensitive, but how do they compare to the human eye? While they respond to the slightest echoes or vibrations and bring us messages from distant worlds in a language we don’t always understand, we still face obstacles. We exist in an environment filled with air, gases, vapors, and solid particles. These elements significantly impact various phenomena; they dissipate the energy of vibrations before they reach the eye and are carriers of harmful germs that enter our lungs and other organs, clogging channels and subtly yet inevitably disrupting the flow of life. If only we could remove all tangible matter along the telescope's line of sight, it would uncover unimaginable wonders. Even the naked eye, I believe, could distinguish small objects in a pure medium from distances likely measured in hundreds or maybe even thousands of miles.

But there is something else about the eye which impresses us still more than these wonderful features which we observed, viewing it from the standpoint of a physicist, merely as an optical instrument,—something which appeals to us more than its marvelous faculty of being directly affected by the vibrations of the[Pg 298] medium, without interference of gross matter, and more than its inconceivable sensitiveness and discerning power. It is its significance in the processes of life. No matter what one's views on nature and life may be, he must stand amazed when, for the first time in his thoughts, he realizes the importance of the eye in the physical processes and mental performances of the human organism. And how could it be otherwise, when he realizes, that the eye is the means through which the human race has acquired the entire knowledge it possesses, that it controls all our motions, more still, all our actions.

But there’s something else about the eye that impresses us even more than the amazing features we've looked at from a physicist's perspective, just as an optical instrument—something that resonates with us more than its incredible ability to be directly influenced by the vibrations of the[Pg 298] medium, without the interference of solid matter, and more than its unimaginable sensitivity and ability to discern. It's its role in the processes of life. Regardless of one’s views on nature and life, anyone must be amazed when, for the first time, they realize how crucial the eye is in the physical processes and mental functions of the human body. And how could it be any other way when one understands that the eye is the means through which humanity has gained all the knowledge it possesses, controlling not just our movements, but even our actions?

There is no way of acquiring knowledge except through the eye. What is the foundation of all philosophical systems of ancient and modern times, in fact, of all the philosophy of man? I am, I think; I think, therefore I am. But how could I think and how would I know that I exist, if I had not the eye? For knowledge involves consciousness; consciousness involves ideas, conceptions; conceptions involve pictures or images, and images the sense of vision, and therefore the organ of sight. But how about blind men, will be asked? Yes, a blind man may depict in magnificent poems, forms and scenes from real life, from a world he physically does not see. A blind man may touch the keys of an instrument with unerring precision, may model the fastest boat, may discover and invent, calculate and construct, may do still greater wonders—but all the blind men who have done such things have descended from those who had seeing eyes. Nature may reach the same result in many ways. Like a wave in the physical world, in the infinite ocean of the medium which pervades all, so in the world of organisms, in life, an impulse started proceeds onward, at times, may be, with the speed of light, at times, again, so slowly that for ages and ages it seems to stay, passing through processes of a complexity inconceivable to men, but in all its forms, in all its stages, its energy ever and ever integrally present. A single ray of light from a distant star falling upon the eye of a tyrant in bygone times, may have altered the course of his life, may have changed the destiny of nations, may have transformed the surface of the globe, so intricate, so inconceivably complex are the processes in Nature. In no way can we get such an overwhelming idea of the grandeur of Nature, as when we consider, that in accordance with the law of the conservation of energy, throughout the infinite, the forces are in a perfect balance, and hence the energy of a single thought may determine the motion of a Uni[Pg 299]verse. It is not necessary that every individual, not even that every generation or many generations, should have the physical instrument of sight, in order to be able to form images and to think, that is, form ideas or conceptions; but sometime or other, during the process of evolution, the eye certainly must have existed, else thought, as we understand it, would be impossible; else conceptions, like spirit, intellect, mind, call it as you may, could not exist. It is conceivable, that in some other world, in some other beings, the eye is replaced by a different organ, equally or more perfect, but these beings cannot be men.

There’s no way to gain knowledge except through sight. What underpins all philosophical systems from ancient to modern times, really, all human philosophy? *I am, I think; I think, therefore I am.* But how could I think, and how would I know I exist, if I didn’t have vision? Knowledge requires awareness; awareness requires ideas, ideas require images, and images rely on sight. But what about blind people, you might ask? Yes, a blind person can create stunning poems about forms and scenes from a world they can’t physically see. A blind person can play an instrument with incredible skill, design the fastest boat, discover and invent, calculate and build, and achieve even greater feats—but all blind people who’ve accomplished such things came from those who had sight. Nature can reach similar outcomes in various ways. Like a wave in the physical world, within the vast ocean of the medium that surrounds us, in the realm of living organisms, an impulse set in motion can move forward, sometimes at the speed of light, and at other times so slowly that it appears to stand still, passing through a complexity beyond our understanding, yet always maintaining its energy in every form and stage. A single beam of light from a distant star hitting the eye of a tyrant long ago could have changed the course of his life, the fate of nations, the surface of the earth—how intricate and unfathomably complex nature’s processes are. We can hardly grasp the grandeur of nature like when we realize that, according to the law of conservation of energy, throughout the infinite, forces are in perfect balance, and hence, the energy of a single thought can influence the motion of a Uni[Pg 299]verse. It’s not necessary for every individual, or even every generation or many generations, to have the ability to see, to form images and think, that is, to create ideas or concepts; but at some point in evolution, the eye must have existed; otherwise, thought as we understand it wouldn't be possible; otherwise, concepts like spirit, intellect, mind—whatever you call it—could not exist. It’s possible that in some other world, other beings might have a different organ instead of the eye, equally or more advanced, but those beings couldn’t be humans.

Now what prompts us all to voluntary motions and actions of any kind? Again the eye. If I am conscious of the motion, I must have an idea or conception, that is, an image, therefore the eye. If I am not precisely conscious of the motion, it is, because the images are vague or indistinct, being blurred by the superimposition of many. But when I perform the motion, does the impulse which prompts me to the action come from within or from without? The greatest physicists have not disdained to endeavor to answer this and similar questions and have at times abandoned themselves to the delights of pure and unrestrained thought. Such questions are generally considered not to belong to the realm of positive physical science, but will before long be annexed to its domain. Helmholtz has probably thought more on life than any modern scientist. Lord Kelvin expressed his belief that life's process is electrical and that there is a force inherent to the organism and determining its motions. Just as much as I am convinced of any physical truth I am convinced that the motive impulse must come from the outside. For, consider the lowest organism we know—and there are probably many lower ones—an aggregation of a few cells only. If it is capable of voluntary motion it can perform an infinite number of motions, all definite and precise. But now a mechanism consisting of a finite number of parts and few at that, cannot perform an infinite number of definite motions, hence the impulses which govern its movements must come from the environment. So, the atom, the ulterior element of the Universe's structure, is tossed about in space, eternally, a play to external influences, like a boat in a troubled sea. Were it to stop its motion it would die. Matter at rest, if such a thing could exist, would be matter dead. Death of matter! Never has a sentence of deeper philosophical meaning been uttered. This is the way in which Prof. Dewar[Pg 300] forcibly expresses it in the description of his admirable experiments, in which liquid oxygen is handled as one handles water, and air at ordinary pressure is made to condense and even to solidify by the intense cold. Experiments, which serve to illustrate, in his language, the last feeble manifestations of life, the last quiverings of matter about to die. But human eyes shall not witness such death. There is no death of matter, for throughout the infinite universe, all has to move, to vibrate, that is, to live.

What motivates us to move and act voluntarily? It all starts with the eye. If I'm aware of my movement, it means I have an image or idea in my mind, so the eye is involved. If I'm not fully aware of the movement, it’s because the images are unclear or fuzzy, mixed up with many others. But when I make a move, does the impulse that drives me come from within or from the outside? The greatest physicists have tried to explore these questions and have often indulged in pure, unrestricted thought. Such questions are usually seen as outside the scope of hard physical science, but they will soon become part of it. Helmholtz has likely pondered life more than any other modern scientist. Lord Kelvin believed that life's processes are electrical and that there's a force within the organism that directs its movements. Just as I believe in physical truths, I also believe that the driving impulse must come from the outside. Consider the simplest organisms we know—and there are likely many simpler ones—made up of just a few cells. If it can move voluntarily, it can perform countless specific movements. However, a mechanism with a limited number of components can’t perform an infinite number of precise motions, so the impulses that guide its movements must come from the environment. Therefore, atoms, the fundamental building blocks of the universe, are tossed around endlessly in space, subject to external influences like a boat in a rough sea. If they were to stop moving, they would die. Matter at rest, if that could even exist, would be matter that is dead. The idea of dead matter! Few statements carry such profound philosophical significance. This is how Prof. Dewar[Pg 300] forcefully describes his impressive experiments, where liquid oxygen is handled like water, and ordinary air is condensed and even solidified by extreme cold. These experiments illustrate, in his words, the last feeble signs of life, the final twitches of matter about to die. But human eyes will never witness such death. There is no death of matter, because throughout the infinite universe, everything must move and vibrate, in other words, it must live.

I have made the preceding statements at the peril of treading upon metaphysical ground, in my desire to introduce the subject of this lecture in a manner not altogether uninteresting, I may hope, to an audience such as I have the honor to address. But now, then, returning to the subject, this divine organ of sight, this indispensable instrument for thought and all intellectual enjoyment, which lays open to us the marvels of this universe, through which we have acquired what knowledge we possess, and which prompts us to, and controls, all our physical and mental activity. By what is it affected? By light! What is light?

I’ve made these previous statements at the risk of venturing into philosophical territory, in my effort to introduce the topic of this lecture in a way that I hope is interesting to the audience I have the honor of addressing. But now, getting back to the subject, this incredible organ of sight, this essential tool for thought and all intellectual enjoyment, which reveals the wonders of our universe, through which we have gained the knowledge we possess, and which inspires and directs all our physical and mental activities. What affects it? Light! What is light?

We have witnessed the great strides which have been made in all departments of science in recent years. So great have been the advances that we cannot refrain from asking ourselves, Is this all true, or is it but a dream? Centuries ago men have lived, have thought, discovered, invented, and have believed that they were soaring, while they were merely proceeding at a snail's pace. So we too may be mistaken. But taking the truth of the observed events as one of the implied facts of science, we must rejoice in the immense progress already made and still more in the anticipation of what must come, judging from the possibilities opened up by modern research. There is, however, an advance which we have been witnessing, which must be particularly gratifying to every lover of progress. It is not a discovery, or an invention, or an achievement in any particular direction. It is an advance in all directions of scientific thought and experiment. I mean the generalization of the natural forces and phenomena, the looming up of a certain broad idea on the scientific horizon. It is this idea which has, however, long ago taken possession of the most advanced minds, to which I desire to call your attention, and which I intend to illustrate in a general way, in these experiments, as the first step in answering the question "What is light?" and to realize the modern meaning of this word.[Pg 301]

We have seen the significant progress made in all areas of science in recent years. The advancements have been so remarkable that we can’t help but ask ourselves, is this really happening, or is it just a dream? Centuries ago, people lived, thought, discovered, invented, and believed they were making great strides while actually moving very slowly. We might be mistaken too. But if we accept the reality of the observed events as a fundamental truth of science, we must celebrate the huge progress we've made so far and even more the promise of what's to come, based on the possibilities unlocked by modern research. However, there is one advancement that stands out, which should be especially satisfying for anyone who values progress. It’s not a specific discovery, invention, or achievement, but an overall advancement in every area of scientific thought and experimentation. I’m referring to the general understanding of natural forces and phenomena, the emergence of a broad idea on the scientific horizon. This idea has long taken hold of the most forward-thinking minds, and I want to draw your attention to it, illustrating it in a general way through these experiments, as the first step in answering the question "What is light?" and grasping its contemporary meaning.[Pg 301]

It is beyond the scope of my lecture to dwell upon the subject of light in general, my object being merely to bring presently to your notice a certain class of light effects and a number of phenomena observed in pursuing the study of these effects. But to be consistent in my remarks it is necessary to state that, according to that idea, now accepted by the majority of scientific men as a positive result of theoretical and experimental investigation, the various forms or manifestations of energy which were generally designated as "electric" or more precisely "electromagnetic" are energy manifestations of the same nature as those of radiant heat and light. Therefore the phenomena of light and heat and others besides these, may be called electrical phenomena. Thus electrical science has become the mother science of all and its study has become all important. The day when we shall know exactly what "electricity" is, will chronicle an event probably greater, more important than any other recorded in the history of the human race. The time will come when the comfort, the very existence, perhaps, of man will depend upon that wonderful agent. For our existence and comfort we require heat, light and mechanical power. How do we now get all these? We get them from fuel, we get them by consuming material. What will man do when the forests disappear, when the coal fields are exhausted? Only one thing, according to our present knowledge will remain; that is, to transmit power at great distances. Men will go to the waterfalls, to the tides, which are the stores of an infinitesimal part of Nature's immeasurable energy. There will they harness the energy and transmit the same to their settlements, to warm their homes by, to give them light, and to keep their obedient slaves, the machines, toiling. But how will they transmit this energy if not by electricity? Judge then, if the comfort, nay, the very existence, of man will not depend on electricity. I am aware that this view is not that of a practical engineer, but neither is it that of an illusionist, for it is certain, that power transmission, which at present is merely a stimulus to enterprise, will some day be a dire necessity.

It's not my intention in this lecture to spend too much time on the topic of light in general; my goal is simply to highlight a specific group of light effects and some phenomena observed while studying these effects. However, to stay consistent in my comments, I need to mention that, according to the idea now accepted by most scientists as a solid result of both theoretical and experimental investigations, the different forms or expressions of energy that have commonly been called "electric" or more accurately "electromagnetic" are actually energy expressions similar to those of radiant heat and light. Therefore, the phenomena of light, heat, and others can be classified as electrical phenomena. As a result, electrical science has become the foundational science of all, and its study is crucial. The day we fully understand what "electricity" is will mark an event likely more significant than any other in the history of humanity. A time will come when human comfort, and perhaps our very survival, will depend on this incredible force. For our survival and comfort, we need heat, light, and mechanical power. Currently, how do we obtain these? We get them from fuel by consuming materials. What will happen when the forests vanish and the coal reserves are depleted? According to what we know now, the only option left will be to transmit energy over long distances. People will harness energy from waterfalls and tides, which are a tiny fraction of Nature's vast energy. They will gather this energy and send it to their communities to heat their homes, provide light, and keep their machines working. But how will they transfer this energy if not through electricity? So, consider whether human comfort—indeed, our very existence—won't hinge on electricity. I understand that this perspective may not align with that of a practical engineer, but it isn’t just a fantasy; it's clear that power transmission, which is currently just a motivator for innovation, will eventually become a critical necessity.

It is more important for the student, who takes up the study of light phenomena, to make himself thoroughly acquainted with certain modern views, than to peruse entire books on the subject of light itself, as disconnected from these views. Were I therefore to make these demonstrations before students seeking information—and for the sake of the few of those who may be[Pg 302] present, give me leave to so assume—it would be my principal endeavor to impress these views upon their minds in this series of experiments.

It’s more important for a student studying light phenomena to understand certain modern perspectives than to read entire books on light without these insights. So, if I were to do these demonstrations for students looking for information—and for the sake of the few who might be[Pg 302] present, let me assume that—my main goal would be to instill these perspectives in their minds through this series of experiments.

It might be sufficient for this purpose to perform a simple and well-known experiment. I might take a familiar appliance, a Leyden jar, charge it from a frictional machine, and then discharge it. In explaining to you its permanent state when charged, and its transitory condition when discharging, calling your attention to the forces which enter into play and to the various phenomena they produce, and pointing out the relation of the forces and phenomena, I might fully succeed in illustrating that modern idea. No doubt, to the thinker, this simple experiment would appeal as much as the most magnificent display. But this is to be an experimental demonstration, and one which should possess, besides instructive, also entertaining features and as such, a simple experiment, such as the one cited, would not go very far towards the attainment of the lecturer's aim. I must therefore choose another way of illustrating, more spectacular certainly, but perhaps also more instructive. Instead of the frictional machine and Leyden jar, I shall avail myself in these experiments, of an induction coil of peculiar properties, which was described in detail by me in a lecture before the London Institution of Electrical Engineers, in Feb., 1892. This induction coil is capable of yielding currents of enormous potential differences, alternating with extreme rapidity. With this apparatus I shall endeavor to show you three distinct classes of effects, or phenomena, and it is my desire that each experiment, while serving for the purposes of illustration, should at the same time teach us some novel truth, or show us some novel aspect of this fascinating science. But before doing this, it seems proper and useful to dwell upon the apparatus employed, and method of obtaining the high potentials and high-frequency currents which are made use of in these experiments.

It might be enough for this purpose to perform a simple and well-known experiment. I could take a familiar device, a Leyden jar, charge it using a friction machine, and then discharge it. While explaining its stable state when charged and its temporary condition when discharging, I would point out the forces at play and the different phenomena they create, highlighting the relationship between the forces and phenomena. This would effectively illustrate that modern idea. No doubt, this simple experiment would appeal to thinkers just as much as the most spectacular demonstration. However, since this is meant to be an experimental demonstration, it should not only be informative but also entertaining, and a straightforward experiment like the one mentioned wouldn’t fully achieve the lecturer's goal. So, I need to choose a different, more impressive way to illustrate the point, which may also be more educational. Instead of the friction machine and Leyden jar, I will use an induction coil with special properties, which I previously described in detail in a lecture at the London Institution of Electrical Engineers in February 1892. This induction coil can produce currents with enormous voltage differences that alternate very rapidly. With this equipment, I’ll aim to show you three distinct types of effects or phenomena, and I want each experiment to not only illustrate the concepts but also teach us something new or reveal an interesting aspect of this captivating science. But before that, it’s useful to focus on the equipment used and the method for generating the high voltages and high-frequency currents employed in these experiments.

ON THE APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONVERSION.

These high-frequency currents are obtained in a peculiar manner. The method employed was advanced by me about two years ago in an experimental lecture before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. A number of ways, as practiced in the laboratory, of obtaining these currents either from continuous or low frequency alternating currents, is diagramatically indicated in Fig. 165, which will be later described in detail. The general [Pg 304] plan is to charge condensers, from a direct or alternate-current source, preferably of high-tension, and to discharge them disruptively while observing well-known conditions necessary to maintain the oscillations of the current. In view of the general interest taken in high-frequency currents and effects producible by them, it seems to me advisable to dwell at some length upon this method of conversion. In order to give you a clear idea of the action, I will suppose that a continuous-current generator is employed, which is often very convenient. It is desirable that the generator should possess such high tension as to be able to break through a small air space. If this is not the case, then auxiliary means have to be resorted to, some of which will be indicated subsequently. When the condensers are charged to a certain potential, the air, or insulating space, gives way and a disruptive discharge occurs. There is then a sudden rush of current and generally a large portion of accumulated electrical energy spends itself. The condensers are thereupon quickly charged and the same process is repeated in more or less rapid succession. To produce such sudden rushes of current it is necessary to observe certain conditions. If the rate at which the condensers are discharged is the same as that at which they are charged, then, clearly, in the assumed case the condensers do not come into play. If the rate of discharge be smaller than the rate of charging, then, again, the condensers cannot play an important part. But if, on the contrary, the rate of discharging is greater than that of charging, then a succession of rushes of current is obtained. It is evident that, if the rate at which the energy is dissipated by the discharge is very much greater than the rate of supply to the condensers, the sudden rushes will be comparatively few, with long-time intervals between. This always occurs when a condenser of considerable capacity is charged by means of a comparatively small machine. If the rates of supply and dissipation are not widely different, then the rushes of current will be in quicker succession, and this the more, the more nearly equal both the rates are, until limitations incident to each case and depending upon a number of causes are reached. Thus we are able to obtain from a continuous-current generator as rapid a succession of discharges as we like. Of course, the higher the tension of the generator, the smaller need be the capacity of the condensers, and for this reason, principally, it is of advantage to employ a generator of very high tension. Besides, such a generator permits the attaining of greater rates of vibration.[Pg 305]

These high-frequency currents are produced in a unique way. I introduced this method about two years ago during an experimental lecture for the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Several ways to generate these currents from continuous or low-frequency alternating currents are diagrammed in Fig. 165, which will be explained in detail later. The basic plan is to charge capacitors with a direct or alternating current source, preferably high voltage, and then discharge them abruptly while ensuring the necessary conditions to maintain the oscillations of the current. Given the widespread interest in high-frequency currents and their effects, I think it's important to elaborate on this method of conversion. To clarify how this works, let's assume we are using a continuous current generator, which is often very practical. It's important that the generator has enough voltage to arc across a small air gap. If it doesn't, additional methods will need to be used, some of which will be addressed later. When the capacitors reach a certain voltage, the air or insulating space breaks down, resulting in a disruptive discharge. This causes a sudden surge of current and typically releases a significant portion of stored electrical energy. The capacitors are then quickly recharged, and this process is repeated at varying speeds. To create these sudden surges of current, specific conditions must be met. If the rate of capacitor discharge matches the rate of charging, then, clearly, the capacitors won't be effective. If the discharge rate is slower than the charging rate, again, the capacitors won't play a significant role. But if the discharge rate is faster than the charging rate, a series of current surges will occur. It's clear that if the rate at which energy is released during discharge greatly exceeds the charging rate, there will be relatively few surges with long intervals in between. This is usually the case when a large capacitor is charged by a relatively small machine. If the supply and dissipation rates are not drastically different, the current surges will happen more quickly, especially as the two rates approach each other, until limitations based on various factors are reached. This way, we can achieve a rapid succession of discharges from a continuous current generator as needed. Of course, the higher the generator's voltage, the smaller the required capacitor size, which is why it's beneficial to use a very high-voltage generator. Additionally, such a generator allows for achieving greater vibration rates.[Pg 305]

Fig. 165. Fig. 165.

The rushes of current may be of the same direction under the conditions before assumed, but most generally there is an oscillation superimposed upon the fundamental vibration of the current. When the conditions are so determined that there are no oscillations, the current impulses are unidirectional and thus a means is provided of transforming a continuous current of high tension, into a direct current of lower tension, which I think may find employment in the arts.

The flow of the current might be going in the same direction under the previously mentioned conditions, but usually, there's an oscillation added on top of the main flow of the current. When the conditions are set so that there are no oscillations, the current impulses move in one direction, which allows for the transformation of a continuous high-voltage current into a lower-voltage direct current, which I believe could be useful in various applications.

This method of conversion is exceedingly interesting and I was much impressed by its beauty when I first conceived it. It is ideal in certain respects. It involves the employment of no mechanical devices of any kind, and it allows of obtaining currents of any desired frequency from an ordinary circuit, direct or alternating. The frequency of the fundamental discharges depending on the relative rates of supply and dissipation can be readily varied within wide limits, by simple adjustments of these quantities, and the frequency of the superimposed vibration by the determination of the capacity, self-induction and resistance of the circuit. The potential of the currents, again, may be raised as high as any insulation is capable of withstanding safely by combining capacity and self-induction or by induction in a secondary, which need have but comparatively few turns.

This method of conversion is really fascinating, and I was struck by its elegance when I first came up with it. It has some ideal aspects. It doesn’t use any mechanical devices at all, and it lets you get currents of any frequency you want from a regular circuit, whether direct or alternating. The frequency of the basic discharges, which depends on how much is supplied and how much is lost, can be easily adjusted over a wide range by simply changing these values. The frequency of the added vibrations can be set by adjusting the capacity, self-induction, and resistance of the circuit. Additionally, the potential of the currents can be increased to whatever level the insulation can safely handle by combining capacity and self-induction or by using induction in a secondary coil, which can have relatively few turns.

As the conditions are often such that the intermittence or oscillation does not readily establish itself, especially when a direct current source is employed, it is of advantage to associate an interrupter with the arc, as I have, some time ago, indicated the use of an air-blast or magnet, or other such device readily at hand. The magnet is employed with special advantage in the conversion of direct currents, as it is then very effective. If the primary source is an alternate current generator, it is desirable, as I have stated on another occasion, that the frequency should be low, and that the current forming the arc be large, in order to render the magnet more effective.

Since the conditions often make it difficult for the interruption or oscillation to happen, particularly when using a direct current source, it's helpful to use an interrupter with the arc. I've pointed out before the use of an air-blast or magnet, or other easily accessible devices. The magnet is particularly useful for converting direct currents, as it works very well in that context. If the primary source is an alternating current generator, as I've mentioned before, it's better if the frequency is low and the current creating the arc is high, to make the magnet more effective.

A form of such discharger with a magnet which has been found convenient, and adopted after some trials, in the conversion of direct currents particularly, is illustrated in Fig. 166. N S are the pole pieces of a very strong magnet which is excited by a coil C. The pole pieces are slotted for adjustment and can be fastened in any position by screws s s1. The discharge rods d d1, thinned down on the ends in order to allow a closer approach of the magnetic pole pieces, pass through the columns of brass b b1 and are [Pg 306]fastened in position by screws s2 s2. Springs r r1 and collars c c1 are slipped on the rods, the latter serving to set the points of the rods at a certain suitable distance by means of screws s3 s3, and the former to draw the points apart. When it is desired to start the arc, one of the large rubber handles h h1 is tapped quickly with the hand, whereby the points of the rods are brought in contact but are instantly separated by the springs r r1. Such an arrangement has been found to be often necessary, namely in cases when the e. m. f. was not large enough to cause the discharge to break through the gap, and also when it was desirable to avoid short circuiting of the generator by the metallic contact of the rods. The rapidity of the interruptions of the current with a magnet depends on the intensity of the magnetic field and on the potential difference at the end of the arc. The interruptions are generally in such quick succession as to produce a musical sound. Years ago it was observed that when a powerful induction coil is discharged between the poles of a strong magnet, the discharge produces a loud noise, not unlike a small pistol shot. It was vaguely stated that the spark was intensified by the presence of the magnetic field. It is now clear that the discharge current, flowing for some time, was interrupted a great number of times by the magnet, thus producing the sound. The phenomenon is especially marked when the field circuit of a large magnet or dynamo is broken in a powerful magnetic field.

A type of discharger with a magnet has proven useful and has been adopted after several trials, especially for converting direct currents, as shown in Fig. 166. N S are the pole pieces of a very strong magnet energized by a coil C. The pole pieces are slotted for adjustment and can be secured in any position with screws s s1. The discharge rods d d1, which are narrowed at the ends to allow closer proximity to the magnetic pole pieces, pass through the brass columns b b1 and are [Pg 306] held in place with screws s2 s2. Springs r r1 and collars c c1 are placed on the rods, with the collars adjusting the rod points to a specific distance using screws s3 s3, while the springs pull the points apart. To start the arc, one of the large rubber handles h h1 is tapped quickly by hand, bringing the rod points together, but they are immediately separated by the springs r r1. This setup is often necessary in situations where the e. m. f. isn’t strong enough for the discharge to jump the gap, and when it’s important to prevent short-circuiting the generator by the metal contact of the rods. The speed of current interruptions with a magnet depends on the strength of the magnetic field and the voltage difference at the arc's end. The interruptions happen rapidly enough to create a musical sound. Years ago, it was noticed that discharging a powerful induction coil between the poles of a strong magnet produces a loud noise similar to a small gunshot. It was vaguely noted that the spark intensity was enhanced by the magnetic field's presence. It is now understood that the discharge current, flowing for a while, was interrupted multiple times by the magnet, creating the sound. This phenomenon is particularly noticeable when the field circuit of a large magnet or dynamo is broken within a strong magnetic field.

Fig. 166. Fig. 166.

When the current through the gap is comparatively large, it is of advantage to slip on the points of the discharge rods pieces of very hard carbon and let the arc play between the carbon pieces. This preserves the rods, and besides has the advantage of keeping the air space hotter, as the heat is not conducted away as quickly through the carbons, and the result is that a smaller e. m. f. in the arc gap is required to maintain a succession of discharges.

When the current through the gap is relatively high, it's useful to put very hard carbon pieces on the tips of the discharge rods and allow the arc to ignite between these carbon pieces. This protects the rods and also helps keep the air space hotter, since the heat is not dissipated as quickly through the carbons. As a result, a lower e. m. f. in the arc gap is needed to maintain a continuous series of discharges.

Fig. 167. Fig. 167.

Another form of discharger, which may be employed with advantage in some cases, is illustrated in Fig. 167. In this form the discharge rods d d1 pass through perforations in a wooden box B, which is thickly coated with mica on the inside, as indicated by the heavy lines. The perforations are provided with mica tubes m m1 of some thickness, which are preferably not in contact with the rods d d1. The box has a cover C which is a little larger and descends on the outside of the box. The spark gap is warmed by a small lamp l contained in the box. A plate p above the lamp allows the draught to pass only through the chimney e of the lamp, the air entering through holes o o in or near the bottom of the box and following the path indicated by the arrows. When the discharger is in operation, the door of the box is closed so that the light of the arc is not visible outside.[Pg 308] It is desirable to exclude the light as perfectly as possible, as it interferes with some experiments. This form of discharger is simple and very effective when properly manipulated. The air being warmed to a certain temperature, has its insulating power impaired; it becomes dielectrically weak, as it were, and the consequence is that the arc can be established at much greater distance. The arc should, of course, be sufficiently insulating to allow the discharge to pass through the gap disruptively. The arc formed under such conditions, when long, may be made extremely sensitive, and the weak draught through the lamp chimney c is quite sufficient to produce rapid interruptions. The adjustment is made by regulating the temperature and velocity of the draught. Instead of using the lamp, it answers the purpose to provide for a draught of warm air in other ways. A very simple way which has been practiced is to enclose the arc in a long vertical tube, with plates on the top and bottom for regulating the temperature and velocity of the air current. Some provision had to be made for deadening the sound.

Another type of discharger that can be beneficial in certain situations is shown in Fig. 167. In this design, the discharge rods d d1 go through holes in a wooden box B, which is heavily lined with mica on the inside, as shown by the thick lines. The holes are fitted with mica tubes m m1 that are thick enough to preferably not touch the rods d d1. The box has a cover C that is slightly larger and fits over the top of the box. A small lamp l inside the box warms the spark gap. A plate p above the lamp allows air to circulate only through the chimney e of the lamp, with air entering through holes o o at or near the bottom of the box and following the path shown by the arrows. When the discharger is in use, the box's door is closed to prevent the arc's light from being seen outside.[Pg 308] It's important to block out the light as much as possible since it can interfere with some experiments. This type of discharger is straightforward and very effective when handled correctly. The air, when warmed to a certain temperature, loses some of its insulating ability; it becomes weakly dielectric, which allows the arc to form at a much greater distance. The arc should be insulating enough to enable the discharge to occur through the gap disruptively. Under these conditions, a longer arc can become extremely sensitive, and the slight draft through the lamp chimney c is enough to produce rapid interruptions. Adjustments can be made by controlling the temperature and speed of the draft. Instead of using the lamp, there are various other methods to create a draft of warm air. One simple approach that has been used is to enclose the arc in a long vertical tube with plates on the top and bottom to regulate the temperature and airflow. Additionally, some measure needed to be taken to reduce the sound.

The air may be rendered dielectrically weak also by rarefaction. Dischargers of this kind have likewise been used by me in connection with a magnet. A large tube is for this purpose provided with heavy electrodes of carbon or metal, between which the discharge is made to pass, the tube being placed in a powerful magnetic field. The exhaustion of the tube is carried to a point at which the discharge breaks through easily, but the pressure should be more than 75 millimetres, at which the ordinary thread discharge occurs. In another form of discharger, combining the features before mentioned, the discharge was made to pass between two adjustable magnetic pole pieces, the space between them being kept at an elevated temperature.

The air can also be made dielectrically weak by being thinned out. I've also used this type of discharger in conjunction with a magnet. For this purpose, a large tube is equipped with heavy carbon or metal electrodes, between which the discharge occurs, while the tube is placed in a strong magnetic field. The tube is evacuated to a point where the discharge easily breaks through, but the pressure should be more than 75 millimeters, where the regular thread discharge happens. In another type of discharger that combines the features mentioned earlier, the discharge was passed between two adjustable magnetic pole pieces, with the space between them kept at a high temperature.

It should be remarked here that when such, or interrupting devices of any kind, are used and the currents are passed through the primary of a disruptive discharge coil, it is not, as a rule, of advantage to produce a number of interruptions of the current per second greater than the natural frequency of vibration of the dynamo supply circuit, which is ordinarily small. It should also be pointed out here, that while the devices mentioned in connection with the disruptive discharge are advantageous under certain conditions, they may be sometimes a source of trouble, as they produce intermittences and other irregularities in the vibration which it would be very desirable to overcome.[Pg 309]

It’s worth noting that when using such interrupting devices, and the currents flow through the primary of a disruptive discharge coil, it generally isn’t beneficial to create more interruptions per second than the natural frequency of vibration of the dynamo supply circuit, which is usually low. It’s also important to mention that while the devices related to the disruptive discharge can be helpful in certain situations, they can sometimes cause issues, as they lead to interruptions and other inconsistencies in the vibration that we would really want to eliminate.[Pg 309]

There is, I regret to say, in this beautiful method of conversion a defect, which fortunately is not vital, and which I have been gradually overcoming. I will best call attention to this defect and indicate a fruitful line of work, by comparing the electrical process with its mechanical analogue. The process may be illustrated in this manner. Imagine a tank with a wide opening at the bottom, which is kept closed by spring pressure, but so that it snaps off suddenly when the liquid in the tank has reached a certain height. Let the fluid be supplied to the tank by means of a pipe feeding at a certain rate. When the critical height of the liquid is reached, the spring gives way and the bottom of the tank drops out. Instantly the liquid falls through the wide opening, and the spring, reasserting itself, closes the bottom again. The tank is now filled, and after a certain time interval the same process is repeated. It is clear, that if the pipe feeds the fluid quicker than the bottom outlet is capable of letting it pass through, the bottom will remain off and the tank will still overflow. If the rates of supply are exactly equal, then the bottom lid will remain partially open and no vibration of the same and of the liquid column will generally occur, though it might, if started by some means. But if the inlet pipe does not feed the fluid fast enough for the outlet, then there will be always vibration. Again, in such case, each time the bottom flaps up or down, the spring and the liquid column, if the pliability of the spring and the inertia of the moving parts are properly chosen, will perform independent vibrations. In this analogue the fluid may be likened to electricity or electrical energy, the tank to the condenser, the spring to the dielectric, and the pipe to the conductor through which electricity is supplied to the condenser. To make this analogy quite complete it is necessary to make the assumption, that the bottom, each time it gives way, is knocked violently against a non-elastic stop, this impact involving some loss of energy; and that, besides, some dissipation of energy results due to frictional losses. In the preceding analogue the liquid is supposed to be under a steady pressure. If the presence of the fluid be assumed to vary rhythmically, this may be taken as corresponding to the case of an alternating current. The process is then not quite as simple to consider, but the action is the same in principle.

I regret to say that in this great method of conversion, there is a flaw that isn’t critical and that I've been gradually addressing. I’ll highlight this flaw and suggest a productive line of work by comparing the electrical process to its mechanical counterpart. Here’s how the process works: Picture a tank with a large opening at the bottom that is kept closed by spring pressure, but it snaps open suddenly when the liquid reaches a certain height. The tank gets filled by a pipe that supplies liquid at a specific rate. When the liquid hits the critical height, the spring releases, and the bottom drops out. Instantly, the liquid pours through the wide opening, and the spring pushes the bottom closed again. The tank is now full, and after a set time, the same process happens again. It’s clear that if the pipe delivers liquid faster than the bottom can let it drain, the bottom will stay open, and the tank will overflow. If the supply rates are exactly equal, then the bottom lid will stay slightly open, and there won’t usually be any vibration in it or in the liquid column unless something causes it to start vibrating. However, if the inlet pipe doesn’t supply the liquid quickly enough for the outlet, there will always be some vibration. In this case, each time the bottom flaps up or down, the spring and the liquid column, if the spring’s flexibility and the inertia of the moving parts are chosen correctly, will vibrate independently. In this analogy, the liquid represents electricity or electrical energy, the tank is like the condenser, the spring represents the dielectric, and the pipe is the conductor supplying electricity to the condenser. To make this analogy complete, we must assume that each time the bottom opens, it hits a non-elastic stop hard, which causes some energy loss, and that energy is also lost due to friction. In the previous analogy, the liquid is assumed to be under steady pressure. If we consider the liquid to vary rhythmically, this corresponds to an alternating current situation. The process isn’t as straightforward to analyze in this case, but the basic principles remain the same.

It is desirable, in order to maintain the vibration economically, to reduce the impact and frictional losses as much as possible.[Pg 310] As regards the latter, which in the electrical analogue correspond to the losses due to the resistance of the circuits, it is impossible to obviate them entirely, but they can be reduced to a minimum by a proper selection of the dimensions of the circuits and by the employment of thin conductors in the form of strands. But the loss of energy caused by the first breaking through of the dielectric—which in the above example corresponds to the violent knock of the bottom against the inelastic stop—would be more important to overcome. At the moment of the breaking through, the air space has a very high resistance, which is probably reduced to a very small value when the current has reached some strength, and the space is brought to a high temperature. It would materially diminish the loss of energy if the space were always kept at an extremely high temperature, but then there would be no disruptive break. By warming the space moderately by means of a lamp or otherwise, the economy as far as the arc is concerned is sensibly increased. But the magnet or other interrupting device does not diminish the loss in the arc. Likewise, a jet of air only facilitates the carrying off of the energy. Air, or a gas in general, behaves curiously in this respect. When two bodies charged to a very high potential, discharge disruptively through an air space, any amount of energy may be carried off by the air. This energy is evidently dissipated by bodily carriers, in impact and collisional losses of the molecules. The exchange of the molecules in the space occurs with inconceivable rapidity. A powerful discharge taking place between two electrodes, they may remain entirely cool, and yet the loss in the air may represent any amount of energy. It is perfectly practicable, with very great potential differences in the gap, to dissipate several horse-power in the arc of the discharge without even noticing a small increase in the temperature of the electrodes. All the frictional losses occur then practically in the air. If the exchange of the air molecules is prevented, as by enclosing the air hermetically, the gas inside of the vessel is brought quickly to a high temperature, even with a very small discharge. It is difficult to estimate how much of the energy is lost in sound waves, audible or not, in a powerful discharge. When the currents through the gap are large, the electrodes may become rapidly heated, but this is not a reliable measure of the energy wasted in the arc, as the loss through the gap itself may be comparatively small. The air or a gas in general is, at ordinary pressure at least,[Pg 311] clearly not the best medium through which a disruptive discharge should occur. Air or other gas under great pressure is of course a much more suitable medium for the discharge gap. I have carried on long-continued experiments in this direction, unfortunately less practicable on account of the difficulties and expense in getting air under great pressure. But even if the medium in the discharge space is solid or liquid, still the same losses take place, though they are generally smaller, for just as soon as the arc is established, the solid or liquid is volatilized. Indeed, there is no body known which would not be disintegrated by the arc, and it is an open question among scientific men, whether an arc discharge could occur at all in the air itself without the particles of the electrodes being torn off. When the current through the gap is very small and the arc very long, I believe that a relatively considerable amount of heat is taken up in the disintegration of the electrodes, which partially on this account may remain quite cold.

To keep the vibration efficient, it’s important to minimize impact and friction losses as much as possible.[Pg 310] Regarding friction losses, which in electrical terms relate to the losses from circuit resistance, we can't completely avoid them, but we can reduce them significantly by carefully choosing the circuit dimensions and using thin conductors in strands. However, the energy loss caused by the initial breakdown of the dielectric—which, in this context, is like the jarring impact of the bottom against a solid stop—is more crucial to address. At the moment of breakdown, the air gap has very high resistance, which drops significantly once the current strengthens and the space heats up. Keeping the space at a consistently high temperature would greatly reduce energy loss, but it would eliminate disruptive breaks. By moderately warming the space with a lamp or another method, we can notably improve efficiency concerning the arc. However, using a magnet or another interrupting device doesn’t lessen the losses in the arc. Likewise, a jet of air merely helps disperse energy. Air, or any gas for that matter, behaves interestingly in this situation. When two objects charged to very high potential discharge disruptively through an air gap, the air can carry away substantial amounts of energy. This energy is clearly dissipated through molecular collisions and impacts. The exchange of air molecules happens at an astonishing speed. During a powerful discharge between two electrodes, they can remain completely cool, but the energy lost in the air can be significant. It’s entirely feasible, with substantial potential differences in the gap, to dissipate several horsepower in the discharge arc without even a slight rise in the electrodes' temperature. Most frictional losses then occur in the air. If the exchange of air molecules is hindered, for instance by sealing the air tightly, the gas inside the vessel can quickly reach a high temperature even with a small discharge. It’s tough to gauge how much energy is lost in sound waves, whether audible or not, during a strong discharge. When the gaps' currents are large, the electrodes might heat up quickly, but this isn’t a reliable indicator of the energy wasted in the arc since the gap loss itself can be relatively small. At normal pressure, air or gas in general is clearly not the best medium for a disruptive discharge.[Pg 311] Air or other gases under high pressure are much more suitable for a discharge gap. I’ve conducted extensive experiments in this area, though they are less feasible due to the challenges and costs of obtaining high-pressure air. Even if the discharge medium is solid or liquid, similar losses still occur, although usually they are smaller, because once the arc is established, the solid or liquid vaporizes. In fact, there is no known substance that wouldn’t be broken down by the arc, and it remains an open question among scientists whether an arc discharge could happen in air itself without particles from the electrodes being knocked off. When the current across the gap is very low and the arc is very long, I believe that a notable amount of heat is absorbed in the disintegration of the electrodes, which is partly why they may remain quite cool.

The ideal medium for a discharge gap should only crack, and the ideal electrode should be of some material which cannot be disintegrated. With small currents through the gap it is best to employ aluminum, but not when the currents are large. The disruptive break in the air, or more or less in any ordinary medium, is not of the nature of a crack, but it is rather comparable to the piercing of innumerable bullets through a mass offering great frictional resistances to the motion of the bullets, this involving considerable loss of energy. A medium which would merely crack when strained electrostatically—and this possibly might be the case with a perfect vacuum, that is, pure ether—would involve a very small loss in the gap, so small as to be entirely negligible, at least theoretically, because a crack may be produced by an infinitely small displacement. In exhausting an oblong bulb provided with two aluminum terminals, with the greatest care, I have succeeded in producing such a vacuum that the secondary discharge of a disruptive discharge coil would break disruptively through the bulb in the form of fine spark streams. The curious point was that the discharge would completely ignore the terminals and start far behind the two aluminum plates which served as electrodes. This extraordinary high vacuum could only be maintained for a very short while. To return to the ideal medium, think, for the sake of illustration, of a piece of glass or similar body clamped in a vice, and the latter tightened more and[Pg 312] more. At a certain point a minute increase of the pressure will cause the glass to crack. The loss of energy involved in splitting the glass may be practically nothing, for though the force is great, the displacement need be but extremely small. Now imagine that the glass would possess the property of closing again perfectly the crack upon a minute diminution of the pressure. This is the way the dielectric in the discharge space should behave. But inasmuch as there would be always some loss in the gap, the medium, which should be continuous, should exchange through the gap at a rapid rate. In the preceding example, the glass being perfectly closed, it would mean that the dielectric in the discharge space possesses a great insulating power; the glass being cracked, it would signify that the medium in the space is a good conductor. The dielectric should vary enormously in resistance by minute variations of the e. m. f. across the discharge space. This condition is attained, but in an extremely imperfect manner, by warming the air space to a certain critical temperature, dependent on the e. m. f. across the gap, or by otherwise impairing the insulating power of the air. But as a matter of fact the air does never break down disruptively, if this term be rigorously interpreted, for before the sudden rush of the current occurs, there is always a weak current preceding it, which rises first gradually and then with comparative suddenness. That is the reason why the rate of change is very much greater when glass, for instance, is broken through, than when the break takes place through an air space of equivalent dielectric strength. As a medium for the discharge space, a solid, or even a liquid, would be preferable therefor. It is somewhat difficult to conceive of a solid body which would possess the property of closing instantly after it has been cracked. But a liquid, especially under great pressure, behaves practically like a solid, while it possesses the property of closing the crack. Hence it was thought that a liquid insulator might be more suitable as a dielectric than air. Following out this idea, a number of different forms of dischargers in which a variety of such insulators, sometimes under great pressure, were employed, have been experimented upon. It is thought sufficient to dwell in a few words upon one of the forms experimented upon. One of these dischargers is illustrated in Figs. 168a and 168b.

The ideal medium for a discharge gap should only crack, and the perfect electrode should be made of a material that won’t break down. For small currents flowing through the gap, aluminum works best, but not for larger currents. The disruptive breakdown in the air, or in any ordinary medium, doesn’t resemble a crack; it’s more like a lot of bullets piercing a mass that offers significant resistance, resulting in considerable energy loss. A medium that merely cracks under electrostatic strain—possibly something like a perfect vacuum, or pure ether—would result in an extremely small loss in the gap, theoretically negligible, since a crack can be created by an infinitely small displacement. In carefully exhausting an oblong bulb with two aluminum terminals, I managed to create a vacuum strong enough that the secondary discharge from a disruptive discharge coil would break through the bulb as fine spark streams. Interestingly, the discharge completely bypassed the terminals and started far behind the two aluminum plates serving as electrodes. However, this exceptionally high vacuum could only be maintained for a very brief period. To illustrate the idea of the ideal medium, picture a piece of glass or a similar object clamped in a vice that's tightened more and more. At a certain point, even a tiny increase in pressure can cause the glass to crack. The energy lost in splitting the glass would be practically negligible because, although the force is significant, the displacement needed is extremely small. Now, imagine if the glass could perfectly seal back up the crack with even a slight reduction in pressure. This is how the dielectric in the discharge space should function. However, since there will always be some energy loss in the gap, the medium, which should be continuous, needs to exchange quickly through the gap. In the previous example, if the glass perfectly sealed, it would mean the dielectric in the discharge space has high insulating power; if the glass cracks, it means the medium in that space is a good conductor. The dielectric should vary greatly in resistance with small changes in the e. m. f. across the discharge space. This is achieved, albeit imperfectly, by heating the air space to a specific critical temperature depending on the e.m.f. across the gap or by otherwise reducing the insulating power of the air. In reality, the air never actually breaks down disruptively, if that term is taken strictly, because before the sudden surge of current happens, there’s always a weaker current that gradually builds up and then increases more rapidly. This explains why the rate of change is much higher when glass, for example, is broken than when the break occurs through an air space of equal dielectric strength. For the discharge space, a solid or even a liquid would be preferable. It is somewhat challenging to imagine a solid that would instantly seal after being cracked. However, a liquid, especially under high pressure, behaves almost like a solid while having the ability to close the crack. As a result, it was believed that a liquid insulator might work better as a dielectric than air. Following this idea, several different types of dischargers using various liquid insulators, sometimes under high pressure, were tested. I will mention just one of these forms that were experimented with. One of these dischargers is shown in Figs. 168a and 168b.

Fig. 168a, 168b.
Fig. 168a.Fig. 168b.

A hollow metal pulley P (Fig. 168a), was fastened upon an arbor a, which by suitable means was rotated at a considerable [Pg 313]speed. On the inside of the pulley, but disconnected from the same, was supported a thin disc h (which is shown thick for the sake of clearness), of hard rubber in which there were embedded two metal segments s s with metallic extensions e e into which were screwed conducting terminals t t covered with thick tubes of hard rubber t t. The rubber disc h with its metallic segments s s, was finished in a lathe, and its entire surface highly polished so as to offer the smallest possible frictional resistance to the motion through a fluid. In the hollow of the pulley an insulating liquid such as a thin oil was poured so as to reach very nearly to the opening left in the flange f, which was screwed tightly on the front side of the pulley. The terminals t t, were connected to the opposite coatings of a battery of condensers so that the discharge occurred through the liquid. When the pulley was rotated, the liquid was forced against the rim of the pulley and considerable fluid pressure resulted. In this simple way the discharge gap was filled with a medium which behaved practically like a solid, which possessed the quality of closing instantly upon the occurrence of the break, and which moreover was circulating through the gap at a rapid rate. Very powerful effects were produced by discharges of this kind with liquid interrupters, of which a number of different forms were made. It was found that, as expected, a longer spark for a given length of wire was obtainable in this way than by using air as an interrupting device. Generally the speed, and therefore also the fluid pressure, was limited by reason of the fluid friction, in the form of discharger described, but the practically obtainable speed was more than sufficient to produce a number of breaks suitable for the circuits ordinarily used. In such instances the metal pulley P was provided with a few projections inwardly, and a definite number of breaks was then produced which could be computed from the speed of[Pg 314] rotation of the pulley. Experiments were also carried on with liquids of different insulating power with the view of reducing the loss in the arc. When an insulating liquid is moderately warmed, the loss in the arc is diminished.

A hollow metal pulley P (Fig. 168a) was attached to an arbor a, which was rotated at a high [Pg 313] speed using appropriate methods. Inside the pulley, but not connected to it, was a thin disc h (shown thicker for clarity) made of hard rubber, containing two metal segments s s with metal extensions e e, into which conducting terminals t t were screwed and covered with thick rubber tubes t t. The rubber disc h and its metal segments s s were machined on a lathe and polished to minimize friction when moving through a liquid. An insulating liquid, like a thin oil, was poured into the hollow of the pulley, nearly reaching the opening in the flange f, which was tightly fastened to the front of the pulley. The terminals t t were connected to opposite ends of a battery of capacitors, allowing the discharge to occur through the liquid. When the pulley spun, the liquid was pushed against the rim of the pulley, generating significant fluid pressure. This setup filled the discharge gap with a medium that acted almost like a solid, capable of closing instantly when a break occurred, while also flowing rapidly through the gap. This method produced powerful effects through discharges using liquid interrupters, with various designs created. It was found that, as anticipated, a longer spark could be generated for a given length of wire in this way compared to using air as an interrupting medium. Generally, the speed, and hence the fluid pressure, was limited due to fluid friction in the described discharger form, but the achievable speed was more than enough to generate multiple breaks for typical circuits. In such cases, the metal pulley P was equipped with several inward projections, allowing for a specific number of breaks to be calculated based on the rotation speed of the pulley. Experiments were also conducted with liquids of varying insulating properties to minimize loss in the arc. When an insulating liquid is warmed moderately, the arc loss decreases.

A point of some importance was noted in experiments with various discharges of this kind. It was found, for instance, that whereas the conditions maintained in these forms were favorable for the production of a great spark length, the current so obtained was not best suited to the production of light effects. Experience undoubtedly has shown, that for such purposes a harmonic rise and fall of the potential is preferable. Be it that a solid is rendered incandescent, or phosphorescent, or be it that energy is transmitted by condenser coating through the glass, it is quite certain that a harmonically rising and falling potential produces less destructive action, and that the vacuum is more permanently maintained. This would be easily explained if it were ascertained that the process going on in an exhausted vessel is of an electrolytic nature.

A significant point was observed in experiments with various types of discharges. For example, it was found that while the conditions used in these forms encouraged a long spark length, the current generated was not ideal for producing light effects. Experience has shown that for this purpose, a smooth rise and fall of potential is better. Whether a solid is heated to incandescence, shows phosphorescence, or whether energy is transferred through a condenser coating in the glass, it is clear that a harmonically rising and falling potential causes less damage and helps maintain the vacuum more effectively. This could easily be explained if it were determined that the process occurring in an evacuated vessel is of an electrolytic nature.

In the diagrammatical sketch, Fig. 165, which has been already referred to, the cases which are most likely to be met with in practice are illustrated. One has at his disposal either direct or alternating currents from a supply station. It is convenient for an experimenter in an isolated laboratory to employ a machine G, such as illustrated, capable of giving both kinds of currents. In such case it is also preferable to use a machine with multiple circuits, as in many experiments it is useful and convenient to have at one's disposal currents of different phases. In the sketch, D represents the direct and A the alternating circuit. In each of these, three branch circuits are shown, all of which are provided with double line switches s s s s s s. Consider first the direct current conversion; Ia represents the simplest case. If the e. m. f. of the generator is sufficient to break through a small air space, at least when the latter is warmed or otherwise rendered poorly insulating, there is no difficulty in maintaining a vibration with fair economy by judicious adjustment of the capacity, self-induction and resistance of the circuit L containing the devices l l m. The magnet N, S, can be in this case advantageously combined with the air space. The discharger d d with the magnet may be placed either way, as indicated by the full or by the dotted lines. The circuit Ia with the connections and devices is supposed to possess dimensions such as are suitable for[Pg 315] the maintenance of a vibration. But usually the e. m. f. on the circuit or branch Ia will be something like a 100 volts or so, and in this case it is not sufficient to break through the gap. Many different means may be used to remedy this by raising the e. m. f. across the gap. The simplest is probably to insert a large self-induction coil in series with the circuit L. When the arc is established, as by the discharger illustrated in Fig. 166, the magnet blows the arc out the instant it is formed. Now the extra current of the break, being of high e. m. f., breaks through the gap, and a path of low resistance for the dynamo current being again provided, there is a sudden rush of current from the dynamo upon the weakening or subsidence of the extra current. This process is repeated in rapid succession, and in this manner I have maintained oscillation with as low as 50 volts, or even less, across the gap. But conversion on this plan is not to be recommended on account of the too heavy currents through the gap and consequent heating of the electrodes; besides, the frequencies obtained in this way are low, owing to the high self-induction necessarily associated with the circuit. It is very desirable to have the e. m. f. as high as possible, first, in order to increase the economy of the conversion, and, secondly, to obtain high frequencies. The difference of potential in this electric oscillation is, of course, the equivalent of the stretching force in the mechanical vibration of the spring. To obtain very rapid vibration in a circuit of some inertia, a great stretching force or difference of potential is necessary. Incidentally, when the e. m. f. is very great, the condenser which is usually employed in connection with the circuit need but have a small capacity, and many other advantages are gained. With a view of raising the e. m. f. to a many times greater value than obtainable from ordinary distribution circuits, a rotating transformer g is used, as indicated at IIa, Fig. 165, or else a separate high potential machine is driven by means of a motor operated from the generator G. The latter plan is in fact preferable, as changes are easier made. The connections from the high tension winding are quite similar to those in branch Ia with the exception that a condenser C, which should be adjustable, is connected to the high tension circuit. Usually, also, an adjustable self-induction coil in series with the circuit has been employed in these experiments. When the tension of the currents is very high, the magnet ordinarily used in connection with the discharger is of comparatively small[Pg 316] value, as it is quite easy to adjust the dimensions of the circuit so that oscillation is maintained. The employment of a steady e. m. f. in the high frequency conversion affords some advantages over the employment of alternating e. m. f., as the adjustments are much simpler and the action can be easier controlled. But unfortunately one is limited by the obtainable potential difference. The winding also breaks down easily in consequence of the sparks which form between the sections of the armature or commutator when a vigorous oscillation takes place. Besides, these transformers are expensive to build. It has been found by experience that it is best to follow the plan illustrated at IIIa. In this arrangement a rotating transformer g, is employed to convert the low tension direct currents into low frequency alternating currents, preferably also of small tension. The tension of the currents is then raised in a stationary transformer T. The secondary S of this transformer is connected to an adjustable condenser C which discharges through the gap or discharger d d, placed in either of the ways indicated, through the primary P of a disruptive discharge coil, the high frequency current being obtained from the secondary S of this coil, as described on previous occasions. This will undoubtedly be found the cheapest and most convenient way of converting direct currents.

In the diagram shown in Fig. 165, which has already been mentioned, the cases most commonly encountered in practice are illustrated. You can use either direct or alternating currents from a supply station. It's convenient for a researcher in a standalone lab to use a machine G like the one shown, which can produce both types of currents. In this case, it's also better to use a machine with multiple circuits since having currents of different phases can be helpful in many experiments. In the sketch, D represents the direct circuit and A represents the alternating circuit. Each of these circuits includes three branch circuits, all equipped with double line switches s s s s s s. First, let's consider the direct current conversion; Ia represents the simplest case. If the e. m. f. of the generator is strong enough to break through a small air gap, at least when that gap is warmed or otherwise made less insulating, maintaining a vibration efficiently should be manageable by carefully adjusting the capacity, self-inductance, and resistance of circuit L that contains the devices l l m. The magnet N, S, can be effectively combined with the air gap. The discharger d d can be placed either way, as shown by the solid or dotted lines. The circuit Ia with its connections and devices is expected to have dimensions suitable for achieving a vibration. However, commonly the e. m. f. across circuit or branch Ia will be around 100 volts, which is usually not enough to bridge the gap. There are various methods to address this, such as increasing the e.m.f. across the gap. The simplest solution is likely to add a large self-induction coil in series with circuit L. When the arc is formed, as shown by the discharger in Fig. 166, the magnet extinguishes the arc the moment it starts. The additional current from the break, being of high e. m. f., can bridge the gap, and with a path of low resistance for the dynamo current restored, there’s a sudden surge of current from the dynamo as the extra current diminishes. This cycle repeats rapidly, allowing me to maintain oscillation with as low as 50 volts, or even less, across the gap. However, this conversion method isn't recommended due to the excessive currents across the gap and the resultant heating of the electrodes; plus, the frequencies achieved this way are low due to the high inductance that is inherently linked to the circuit. It is very desirable to have the e. m. f. as high as possible, firstly to improve conversion efficiency and secondly to attain high frequencies. The potential difference in this electrical oscillation is, of course, akin to the stretching force in the mechanical vibration of a spring. To achieve very rapid oscillation in a circuit with some inertia, a significant potential difference is necessary. Also, when the e. m. f. is very high, the capacitor typically used with the circuit can have a small capacity, leading to many additional advantages. To increase the e. m. f. to values many times greater than what is typically obtainable from standard distribution circuits, a rotating transformer g is utilized, as shown in IIa, Fig. 165, or a separate high-voltage machine is driven by a motor connected to generator G. The latter approach is actually preferred, as it allows for easier adjustments. The connections from the high-tension winding are quite similar to those in branch Ia, except that an adjustable capacitor C is connected to the high-tension circuit. Typically, an adjustable self-inductance coil in series with the circuit is also used in these experiments. When the voltage of the currents is very high, the magnet usually used with the discharger is relatively small, as it's quite easy to adjust the circuit dimensions to maintain oscillation. Using a steady e.m.f. for high-frequency conversion provides some advantages over using alternating e.m.f., as the adjustments are simpler and the operation can be more easily controlled. Unfortunately, though, the potential difference you can obtain is limited, and the winding can easily break down due to the sparks that occur between the sections of the armature or commutator when vigorous oscillation happens. Additionally, these transformers can be expensive to produce. Experience has shown that it’s best to follow the plan illustrated in IIIa. In this setup, a rotating transformer g is used to convert low-voltage direct currents into low-frequency alternating currents, preferably at low voltage as well. The voltage of the currents is then increased in a stationary transformer T. The secondary S of this transformer is connected to an adjustable capacitor C that discharges through the gap or discharger d d, which can be configured in either indicated manner, through the primary P of a disruptive discharge coil, with the high-frequency current being generated from the secondary S of this coil, as previously described. This approach is likely the most cost-effective and practical method for converting direct currents.

The three branches of the circuit A represent the usual cases met in practice when alternating currents are converted. In Fig. 1b a condenser C, generally of large capacity, is connected to the circuit L containing the devices l l, m m. The devices m m are supposed to be of high self-induction so as to bring the frequency of the circuit more or less to that of the dynamo. In this instance the discharger d d should best have a number of makes and breaks per second equal to twice the frequency of the dynamo. If not so, then it should have at least a number equal to a multiple or even fraction of the dynamo frequency. It should be observed, referring to Ib, that the conversion to a high potential is also effected when the discharger d d, which is shown in the sketch, is omitted. But the effects which are produced by currents which rise instantly to high values, as in a disruptive discharge, are entirely different from those produced by dynamo currents which rise and fall harmonically. So, for instance, there might be in a given case a number of makes and breaks at d d equal to just twice the frequency of the dynamo, or in other words, there may be the same number of fundamental oscillations as would be pro[Pg 317]duced without the discharge gap, and there might even not be any quicker superimposed vibration; yet the differences of potential at the various points of the circuit, the impedance and other phenomena, dependent upon the rate of change, will bear no similarity in the two cases. Thus, when working with currents discharging disruptively, the element chiefly to be considered is not the frequency, as a student might be apt to believe, but the rate of change per unit of time. With low frequencies in a certain measure the same effects may be obtained as with high frequencies, provided the rate of change is sufficiently great. So if a low frequency current is raised to a potential of, say, 75,000 volts, and the high tension current passed through a series of high resistance lamp filaments, the importance of the rarefied gas surrounding the filament is clearly noted, as will be seen later; or, if a low frequency current of several thousand amperes is passed through a metal bar, striking phenomena of impedance are observed, just as with currents of high frequencies. But it is, of course, evident that with low frequency currents it is impossible to obtain such rates of change per unit of time as with high frequencies, hence the effects produced by the latter are much more prominent. It is deemed advisable to make the preceding remarks, inasmuch as many more recently described effects have been unwittingly identified with high frequencies. Frequency alone in reality does not mean anything, except when an undisturbed harmonic oscillation is considered.

The three branches of circuit A represent the common situations encountered in practice when converting alternating currents. In Fig. 1b, a condenser C, usually with a large capacity, is connected to circuit L, which includes devices l l and m m. The devices m m are assumed to have high self-induction to adjust the circuit's frequency closer to that of the dynamo. In this case, the discharger d d should ideally have a number of cycles per second equal to twice the frequency of the dynamo. If that’s not the case, it should have at least a number matching a multiple or even a fraction of the dynamo frequency. It's important to note, referring to Ib, that high potential conversion also occurs when the discharger d d, shown in the sketch, is removed. However, the effects produced by currents that instantly surge to high values, such as in a disruptive discharge, are completely different from those created by dynamo currents that fluctuate harmonically. For instance, there could be a number of cycles at d d that equals exactly twice the dynamo frequency, meaning there may be the same number of fundamental oscillations as would occur without the discharge gap. There may not even be a faster superimposed vibration; yet the differences in potential at various points in the circuit, the impedance, and other phenomena that depend on the rate of change will not be similar in the two cases. Therefore, when dealing with currents that discharge disruptively, the main factor to consider is not the frequency, as a student might think, but the rate of change over time. With low frequencies, similar effects can be achieved as with high frequencies, as long as the rate of change is sufficiently high. So, if a low frequency current is increased to a potential of, say, 75,000 volts, and the high-tension current is passed through a series of high-resistance lamp filaments, the significance of the rarefied gas around the filament will be evident, as will be shown later. Or, if a low frequency current of several thousand amperes flows through a metal bar, impressive impedance phenomena can be observed, just like with high frequency currents. But, it's clear that with low frequency currents, achieving such rates of change over time is impossible compared to high frequencies, making the effects from the latter much more prominent. It's worth noting these points since many recently described effects have been mistakenly attributed to high frequencies. Frequency alone doesn't really mean anything unless considered in the context of undisturbed harmonic oscillation.

In the branch IIIb a similar disposition to that in Ib is illustrated, with the difference that the currents discharging through the gap d d are used to induce currents in the secondary S of a transformer T. In such case the secondary should be provided with an adjustable condenser for the purpose of tuning it to the primary.

In section IIIb, a similar arrangement to that in Ib is shown, but in this case, the currents flowing through the gap d d are used to create currents in the secondary S of a transformer T. In this situation, the secondary should include an adjustable capacitor to tune it to the primary.

IIb illustrates a plan of alternate current high frequency conversion which is most frequently used and which is found to be most convenient. This plan has been dwelt upon in detail on previous occasions and need not be described here.

IIb shows a method for converting high-frequency alternating current that is used most often and is considered the most convenient. This method has been discussed in detail before and doesn’t need to be explained here.

Some of these results were obtained by the use of a high frequency alternator. A description of such machines will be found in my original paper before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, and in periodicals of that period, notably in The Electrical Engineer of March 18, 1891.

Some of these results were achieved using a high-frequency alternator. You can find a description of these machines in my original paper presented to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, as well as in periodicals from that time, particularly in The Electrical Engineer from March 18, 1891.

I will now proceed with the experiments.[Pg 318]

I will now move forward with the experiments.[Pg 318]

ON PHENOMENA PRODUCED BY ELECTROSTATIC FORCE.

The first class of effects I intend to show you are effects produced by electrostatic force. It is the force which governs the the motion of the atoms, which causes them to collide and develop the life-sustaining energy of heat and light, and which causes them to aggregate in an infinite variety of ways, according to Nature's fanciful designs, and to form all these wondrous structures we perceive around us; it is, in fact, if our present views be true, the most important force for us to consider in Nature. As the term electrostatic might imply a steady electric condition, it should be remarked, that in these experiments the force is not constant, but varies at a rate which may be considered moderate, about one million times a second, or thereabouts. This enables me to produce many effects which are not producible with an unvarying force.

The first type of effects I want to show you are those created by electrostatic force. This is the force that controls the movement of atoms, causing them to collide and generate the life-sustaining energy of heat and light, and it leads to their arrangement in countless ways, according to Nature's creative designs, forming all the amazing structures we see around us. In fact, if our current understanding is correct, it is the most crucial force for us to consider in Nature. Although the term electrostatic might suggest a stable electric state, it's important to note that in these experiments, the force is not constant; it varies at a rate that can be considered moderate, about one million times per second, more or less. This allows me to create many effects that cannot be achieved with a steady force.

When two conducting bodies are insulated and electrified, we say that an electrostatic force is acting between them. This force manifests itself in attractions, repulsions and stresses in the bodies and space or medium without. So great may be the strain exerted in the air, or whatever separates the two conducting bodies, that it may break down, and we observe sparks or bundles of light or streamers, as they are called. These streamers form abundantly when the force through the air is rapidly varying. I will illustrate this action of electrostatic force in a novel experiment in which I will employ the induction coil before referred to. The coil is contained in a trough filled with oil, and placed under the table. The two ends of the secondary wire pass through the two thick columns of hard rubber which protrude to some height above the table. It is necessary to insulate the ends or terminals of the secondary heavily with hard rubber, because even dry wood is by far too poor an insulator for these currents of enormous potential differences. On one of the terminals of the coil, I have placed a large sphere of sheet brass, which is connected to a larger insulated brass plate, in order to enable me to perform the experiments under conditions, which, as you will see, are more suitable for this experiment. I now set the coil to work and approach the free terminal with a metallic object held in my hand, this simply to avoid burns. As I approach the metallic object to a distance of eight or ten inches, a torrent of furious sparks breaks forth from the end of the secondary wire, which[Pg 319] passes through the rubber column. The sparks cease when the metal in my hand touches the wire. My arm is now traversed by a powerful electric current, vibrating at about the rate of one million times a second. All around me the electrostatic force makes itself felt, and the air molecules and particles of dust flying about are acted upon and are hammering violently against my body. So great is this agitation of the particles, that when the lights are turned out you may see streams of feeble light appear on some parts of my body. When such a streamer breaks out on any part of the body, it produces a sensation like the pricking of a needle. Were the potentials sufficiently high and the frequency of the vibration rather low, the skin would probably be ruptured under the tremendous strain, and the blood would rush out with great force in the form of fine spray or jet so thin as to be invisible, just as oil will when placed on the positive terminal of a Holtz machine. The breaking through of the skin though it may seem impossible at first, would perhaps occur, by reason of the tissues under the skin being incomparably better conducting. This, at least, appears plausible, judging from some observations.

When two electrically charged objects are insulated from each other, there’s an electrostatic force acting between them. This force shows up as attractions, repulsions, and tension in the objects and the surrounding air or medium. The strain in the air—or whatever separates the two charged objects—can get so intense that it leads to breakdowns, causing sparks or flashes of light, known as streamers. These streamers appear more frequently when the force is changing rapidly through the air. I’ll demonstrate this action of electrostatic force with a new experiment using the induction coil I mentioned earlier. The coil is placed in a trough filled with oil and is positioned under the table. The two ends of the secondary wire run through two thick columns of hard rubber, which extend above the table. It’s essential to insulate the terminals of the secondary wire heavily with hard rubber, since even dry wood isn't a good enough insulator for these high-voltage currents. I’ve attached a large brass sphere to one terminal of the coil, which is connected to a bigger insulated brass plate, to create conditions that are more suitable for this experiment. Now, I turn on the coil and bring a metallic object close to the open terminal to avoid burns. As I get about eight or ten inches away with the metal object, a stream of rapid sparks shoots out from the end of the secondary wire coming through the rubber column. The sparks stop when the metal touches the wire. A strong electric current flows through my arm, oscillating at roughly one million times per second. The electrostatic force is felt all around me, affecting air molecules and dust particles nearby, which are violently hitting my body. This agitation of particles is so intense that, when the lights go out, you can see faint streams of light appearing on certain parts of my body. When a streamer appears on any part of my skin, it feels like a needle prick. If the potentials were high enough and the vibration frequency low enough, my skin could potentially rupture under the immense pressure, causing blood to spray out forcefully in such a fine mist that it would be invisible, similar to how oil behaves on the positive terminal of a Holtz machine. Although it might seem impossible at first, the skin could break due to the underlying tissues being much better conductors. This seems plausible based on some observations.

Fig. 169. Fig. 169.

I can make these streams of light visible to all, by touching with the metallic object one of the terminals as before, and approaching my free hand to the brass sphere, which is connected to the second terminal of the coil. As the hand is approached, the air between it and the sphere, or in the immediate neighborhood, is more violently agitated, and you see streams of light now break forth from my finger tips and from the whole hand (Fig. 169). Were I to approach the hand closer, powerful sparks would jump from the brass sphere to my hand, which might be injurious. The streamers offer no particular inconvenience, except that in the ends of the finger[Pg 320] tips a burning sensation is felt. They should not be confounded with those produced by an influence machine, because in many respects they behave differently. I have attached the brass sphere and plate to one of the terminals in order to prevent the formation of visible streamers on that terminal, also in order to prevent sparks from jumping at a considerable distance. Besides, the attachment is favorable for the working of the coil.

I can make these streams of light visible to everyone by touching one of the terminals with the metal object as before and bringing my free hand closer to the brass sphere, which is connected to the second terminal of the coil. As my hand gets closer, the air between it and the sphere, or in the nearby area, gets agitated, and you can see streams of light burst forth from my fingertips and from my entire hand (Fig. 169). If I bring my hand even closer, powerful sparks would jump from the brass sphere to my hand, which could be harmful. The streamers don't really cause any issues, except that there’s a burning sensation felt at the tips of the fingers. They shouldn't be confused with those produced by an influence machine, because in many ways they behave differently. I’ve attached the brass sphere and plate to one of the terminals to stop visible streamers from forming on that terminal and to prevent sparks from jumping at a considerable distance. Also, the attachment is good for the coil’s operation.

The streams of light which you have observed issuing from my hand are due to a potential of about 200,000 volts, alternating in rather irregular intervals, sometimes like a million times a second. A vibration of the same amplitude, but four times as fast, to maintain which over 3,000,000 volts would be required, would be more than sufficient to envelop my body in a complete sheet of flame. But this flame would not burn me up; quite contrarily, the probability is that I would not be injured in the least. Yet a hundredth part of that energy, otherwise directed, would be amply sufficient to kill a person.

The streams of light you've seen coming from my hand are caused by a potential of about 200,000 volts, alternating at rather irregular intervals, sometimes up to a million times a second. A vibration of the same strength, but four times faster, would require over 3,000,000 volts to maintain and would be more than enough to wrap my body in a complete sheet of flame. However, this flame wouldn’t harm me at all; in fact, it’s likely that I wouldn’t be hurt in the slightest. Yet just a hundredth of that energy, if directed differently, would be more than enough to kill someone.

The amount of energy which may thus be passed into the body of a person depends on the frequency and potential of the currents, and by making both of these very great, a vast amount of energy may be passed into the body without causing any discomfort, except perhaps, in the arm, which is traversed by a true conduction current. The reason why no pain in the body is felt, and no injurious effect noted, is that everywhere, if a current be imagined to flow through the body, the direction of its flow would be at right angles to the surface; hence the body of the experimenter offers an enormous section to the current, and the density is very small, with the exception of the arm, perhaps, where the density may be considerable. But if only a small fraction of that energy would be applied in such a way that a current would traverse the body in the same manner as a low frequency current, a shock would be received which might be fatal. A direct or low frequency alternating current is fatal, I think, principally because its distribution through the body is not uniform, as it must divide itself in minute streamlets of great density, whereby some organs are vitally injured. That such a process occurs I have not the least doubt, though no evidence might apparently exist, or be found upon examination. The surest to injure and destroy life, is a continuous current, but the most painful is an alternating current of very low frequency. The expression of these views, which are the result of long con[Pg 321]tinued experiment and observation, both with steady and varying currents, is elicited by the interest which is at present taken in this subject, and by the manifestly erroneous ideas which are daily propounded in journals on this subject.

The amount of energy that can be transferred into a person's body depends on the frequency and voltage of the currents. By increasing both of these significantly, a large amount of energy can be transferred to the body without causing discomfort, except possibly in the arm, which is passed through by a direct conduction current. The reason for the absence of pain or harmful effects in the body is that if you imagine a current flowing through the body, its direction would be perpendicular to the surface; therefore, the person offers a huge area to the current, resulting in a very low density, except in the arm, where the density may be considerable. However, if even a small portion of that energy were applied in a way that a current passed through the body like a low-frequency current, a shock could be received that might be fatal. A direct current or low-frequency alternating current can be lethal because its distribution through the body isn't uniform; it splits into tiny streams of high density, which can severely damage some organs. I have no doubt that this happens, even if there's no apparent evidence or findings upon examination. A continuous current is the most certain to cause injury and death, while a very low-frequency alternating current is the most painful. These views, which come from extensive experimentation and observation with both steady and varying currents, are expressed due to the current interest in this topic and the clearly misguided ideas that are presented daily in journals on this matter.

I may illustrate an effect of the electrostatic force by another striking experiment, but before, I must call your attention to one or two facts. I have said before, that when the medium between two oppositely electrified bodies is strained beyond a certain limit it gives way and, stated in popular language, the opposite electric charges unite and neutralize each other. This breaking down of the medium occurs principally when the force acting between the bodies is steady, or varies at a moderate rate. Were the variation sufficiently rapid, such a destructive break would not occur, no matter how great the force, for all the energy would be spent in radiation, convection and mechanical and chemical action. Thus the spark length, or greatest distance which a spark will jump between the electrified bodies is the smaller, the greater the variation or time rate of change. But this rule may be taken to be true only in a general way, when comparing rates which are widely different.

I can show you how the electrostatic force works with a striking experiment, but first, I need to highlight a couple of facts. I've mentioned before that when the medium between two oppositely charged bodies is strained beyond a certain point, it breaks down, and in simple terms, the opposite electric charges come together and cancel each other out. This breakdown of the medium mainly happens when the force between the bodies is steady or changes at a moderate pace. If the change happens quickly enough, this kind of breakdown won't occur, no matter how strong the force is, because all the energy will be used up in radiation, convection, and mechanical and chemical actions. Therefore, the spark length, or the maximum distance a spark can jump between charged bodies, is shorter the faster the rate of change. However, this rule is generally true only when comparing rates that are very different.

Fig. 170a, 170b.
Fig. 170a.Fig. 170b.

I will show you by an experiment the difference in the effect produced by a rapidly varying and a steady or moderately varying force. I have here two large circular brass plates p p (Fig. 170a and Fig. 170b), supported on movable insulating stands on the table, connected to the ends of the secondary of a coil similar to the one used before. I place the plates ten or twelve inches apart and set the coil to work. You see the whole space between the plates, nearly two cubic feet, filled with uniform light, Fig. 170a. This light is due to the streamers you have seen in the first experiment, which are now much more intense. I have already pointed out the importance of these streamers in commercial apparatus and their still greater importance in some purely scientific investigations. Often they are too weak to be visible, but[Pg 322] they always exist, consuming energy and modifying the action of the apparatus. When intense, as they are at present, they produce ozone in great quantity, and also, as Professor Crookes has pointed out, nitrous acid. So quick is the chemical action that if a coil, such as this one, is worked for a very long time it will make the atmosphere of a small room unbearable, for the eyes and throat are attacked. But when moderately produced, the streamers refresh the atmosphere wonderfully, like a thunder-storm, and exercises unquestionably a beneficial effect.

I’m going to demonstrate the difference in the effect produced by a rapidly changing force compared to a steady or moderately changing force. I have two large circular brass plates p p (Fig. 170a and Fig. 170b), placed on movable insulating stands on the table, connected to the ends of the secondary winding of a coil similar to one we've used before. I set the plates ten or twelve inches apart and turn on the coil. You can see that the entire space between the plates, nearly two cubic feet, is filled with uniform light, as shown in Fig. 170a. This light comes from the streamers you observed in the first experiment, which are now much more intense. I've already mentioned how important these streamers are in commercial equipment and even more so in purely scientific research. Often, they are too weak to be visible, but[Pg 322] they are always present, consuming energy and affecting the operation of the equipment. When they are strong, like they are now, they produce a large amount of ozone, and as Professor Crookes has pointed out, also nitrous acid. The chemical action happens so quickly that if a coil like this is used for an extended period, it can make the air in a small room unbearable, irritating the eyes and throat. However, when produced in moderate amounts, the streamers refresh the atmosphere beautifully, similar to a thunderstorm, and they definitely have a beneficial effect.

In this experiment the force acting between the plates changes in intensity and direction at a very rapid rate. I will now make the rate of change per unit time much smaller. This I effect by rendering the discharges through the primary of the induction coil less frequent, and also by diminishing the rapidity of the vibration in the secondary. The former result is conveniently secured by lowering the e. m. f. over the air gap in the primary circuit, the latter by approaching the two brass plates to a distance of about three or four inches. When the coil is set to work, you see no streamers or light between the plates, yet the medium between them is under a tremendous strain. I still further augment the strain by raising the e. m. f. in the primary circuit, and soon you see the air give way and the hall is illuminated by a shower of brilliant and noisy sparks, Fig. 170b. These sparks could be produced also with unvarying force; they have been for many years a familiar phenomenon, though they were usually obtained from an entirely different apparatus. In describing these two phenomena so radically different in appearance, I have advisedly spoken of a "force" acting between the plates. It would be in accordance with accepted views to say, that there was an "alternating e. m. f," acting between the plates. This term is quite proper and applicable in all cases where there is evidence of at least a possibility of an essential inter-dependence of the electric state of the plates, or electric action in their neighborhood. But if the plates were removed to an infinite distance, or if at a finite distance, there is no probability or necessity whatever for such dependence. I prefer to use the term "electrostatic force," and to say that such a force is acting around each plate or electrified insulated body in general. There is an inconvenience in using this expression as the term incidentally means a steady electric condition; but a proper nomenclature will eventually settle this difficulty.[Pg 323]

In this experiment, the force between the plates changes rapidly in both intensity and direction. Now, I will slow down the rate of change per unit time. I do this by making the discharges through the primary of the induction coil less frequent and by reducing the speed of vibration in the secondary. The first result is achieved by lowering the voltage across the air gap in the primary circuit, and the second by bringing the two brass plates closer together, to about three or four inches apart. When the coil is activated, you won’t see any streamers or light between the plates, yet the medium between them is under a huge strain. I further increase this strain by raising the EMF in the primary circuit, and soon you see the air break down, filling the room with bright and loud sparks, Fig. 170b. These sparks can also be produced with constant force; they have been a familiar phenomenon for many years, though they were typically generated by entirely different equipment. In discussing these two vastly different appearances, I've intentionally referred to a "force" acting between the plates. It would generally be acceptable to say that there was an "alternating emf" acting between the plates. This term is entirely appropriate when there’s evidence suggesting a potential essential interdependence of the electric state of the plates or electric activity in their vicinity. However, if the plates were moved to an infinite distance apart, or even at a finite distance where such dependence is neither likely nor necessary, I prefer to use the term "electrostatic force." This force acts around each plate or any electrified insulated body in general. While using this term can be inconvenient since it occasionally implies a steady electric condition, a proper naming convention will eventually resolve this issue.[Pg 323]

I now return to the experiment to which I have already alluded, and with which I desire to illustrate a striking effect produced by a rapidly varying electrostatic force. I attach to the end of the wire, l (Fig. 171), which is in connection with one of the terminals of the secondary of the induction coil, an exhausted bulb b. This bulb contains a thin carbon filament f, which is fastened to a platinum wire w, sealed in the glass and leading outside of the bulb, where it connects to the wire l. The bulb may be exhausted to any degree attainable with ordinary apparatus. Just a moment before, you have witnessed the breaking down of the air between the charged brass plates. You know that a plate of glass, or any other insulating material, would break down in like manner. Had I therefore a metallic coating attached to the outside of the bulb, or placed near the same, and were this coating connected to the other terminal of the coil, you would be prepared to see the glass give way if the strain were sufficiently increased. Even were the coating not connected to the other terminal, but to an insulated plate, still, if you have followed recent developments, you would naturally expect a rupture of the glass.

I now return to the experiment I've already mentioned, which I want to use to show a striking effect caused by a quickly changing electrostatic force. At the end of the wire, l (Fig. 171), connected to one of the terminals of the induction coil’s secondary, I attach an exhausted bulb b. This bulb has a thin carbon filament f, which is attached to a platinum wire w that is sealed in the glass and extends outside the bulb, connecting to the wire l. The bulb can be evacuated to any level achievable with standard equipment. Just a moment ago, you saw the air break down between the charged brass plates. You know that a piece of glass, or any other insulating material, would fail in a similar way. So, if I had a metallic coating attached to the outside of the bulb or placed nearby, and this coating was connected to the other terminal of the coil, you would expect the glass to fail if the pressure was increased enough. Even if the coating wasn’t connected to the other terminal but instead to an insulated plate, if you’ve kept up with recent developments, you would still expect the glass to break.

Fig. 171, 172a, 172b.
Fig. 171.Fig. 172a.Fig. 172b.

But it will certainly surprise you to note that under the action of the varying electrostatic force, the glass gives way when all other bodies are removed from the bulb. In fact, all the surrounding bodies we perceive might be removed to an infinite distance without affecting the result in the slightest. When the coil is set to work, the glass is invariably broken through at the seal, or other narrow channel, and the vacuum is quickly impaired.[Pg 324] Such a damaging break would not occur with a steady force, even if the same were many times greater. The break is due to the agitation of the molecules of the gas within the bulb, and outside of the same. This agitation, which is generally most violent in the narrow pointed channel near the seal, causes a heating and rupture of the glass. This rupture, would, however, not occur, not even with a varying force, if the medium filling the inside of the bulb, and that surrounding it, were perfectly homogeneous. The break occurs much quicker if the top of the bulb is drawn out into a fine fibre. In bulbs used with these coils such narrow, pointed channels must therefore be avoided.

But you'll definitely be surprised to realize that when the electrostatic force changes, the glass breaks even when all other objects are removed from the bulb. In fact, all surrounding objects could be moved an infinite distance away without changing the outcome at all. When the coil is activated, the glass consistently breaks at the seal or another narrow passage, and the vacuum is rapidly compromised.[Pg 324] This kind of break wouldn't happen with a steady force, even if it were much stronger. The break is caused by the agitation of the gas molecules inside and outside the bulb. This agitation, which is usually most intense in the narrow pointed channel near the seal, leads to heating and breaking of the glass. However, this break wouldn't happen—even with a varying force—if the material inside the bulb and the surrounding environment were completely uniform. The break occurs much more quickly if the top of the bulb is stretched into a fine fiber. Therefore, in bulbs used with these coils, such narrow, pointed channels should be avoided.

When a conducting body is immersed in air, or similar insulating medium, consisting of, or containing, small freely movable particles capable of being electrified, and when the electrification of the body is made to undergo a very rapid change—which is equivalent to saying that the electrostatic force acting around the body is varying in intensity,—the small particles are attracted and repelled, and their violent impacts against the body may cause a mechanical motion of the latter. Phenomena of this kind are noteworthy, inasmuch as they have not been observed before with apparatus such as has been commonly in use. If a very light conducting sphere be suspended on an exceedingly fine wire, and charged to a steady potential, however high, the sphere will remain at rest. Even if the potential would be rapidly varying, provided that the small particles of matter, molecules or atoms, are evenly distributed, no motion of the sphere should result. But if one side of the conducting sphere is covered with a thick insulating layer, the impacts of the particles will cause the sphere to move about, generally in irregular curves, Fig. 172a. In like manner, as I have shown on a previous occasion, a fan of sheet metal, Fig. 172b, covered partially with insulating material as indicated, and placed upon the terminal of the coil so as to turn freely on it, is spun around.

When a conducting object is placed in air or another insulating medium that has small, freely movable particles that can become electrified, and if the electrification of the object changes very quickly—which means that the electrostatic force around it is fluctuating—the small particles will be attracted and repelled, and their forceful impacts against the object can cause it to move. These occurrences are significant because they haven't been seen before with the typical equipment used. If a very lightweight conducting sphere is hanging from an extremely thin wire and is charged to a stable potential, no matter how high, the sphere will stay still. Even if the potential varies quickly, as long as the small particles of matter, molecules, or atoms are evenly spread out, there won't be any motion of the sphere. However, if one side of the conducting sphere is covered with a thick insulating layer, the impacts from the particles will make the sphere move, usually in irregular curves, Fig. 172a. Similarly, as I previously demonstrated, a fan made of sheet metal, Fig. 172b, that is partially covered with insulating material as shown and placed on the end of the coil so that it can rotate freely, will spin around.

All these phenomena you have witnessed and others which will be shown later, are due to the presence of a medium like air, and would not occur in a continuous medium. The action of the air may be illustrated still better by the following experiment. I take a glass tube t, Fig. 173, of about an inch in diameter, which has a platinum wire w sealed in the lower end, and to which is attached a thin lamp filament f. I connect the wire with the terminal of the coil and set the coil to work. The[Pg 325] platinum wire is now electrified positively and negatively in rapid succession and the wire and air inside of the tube is rapidly heated by the impacts of the particles, which may be so violent as to render the filament incandescent. But if I pour oil in the tube, just as soon as the wire is covered with the oil, all action apparently ceases and there is no marked evidence of heating. The reason of this is that the oil is a practically continuous medium. The displacements in such a continuous medium are, with these frequencies, to all appearance incomparably smaller than in air, hence the work performed in such a medium is insignificant. But oil would behave very differently with frequencies many times as great, for even though the displacements be small, if the frequency were much greater, considerable work might be performed in the oil.

All these phenomena you've seen, as well as others that will be discussed later, are due to the presence of a medium like air and wouldn't happen in a continuous medium. The action of the air can be better illustrated with the following experiment. I take a glass tube t, Fig. 173, about an inch in diameter, which has a platinum wire w sealed in the lower end, and to which a thin lamp filament f is attached. I connect the wire to the terminal of the coil and turn it on. The[Pg 325] platinum wire is now charged positively and negatively in quick succession, and the wire and air inside the tube heat up rapidly due to the impacts of the particles, which can be so forceful that the filament glows. However, if I pour oil into the tube, as soon as the wire is covered with oil, all activity seems to stop, and there's no significant evidence of heating. This is because the oil acts as a practically continuous medium. The displacements in such a continuous medium, at these frequencies, are incredibly smaller than in air, so the work done in such a medium is minimal. But oil would react very differently at much higher frequencies, because even though the displacements would be small, if the frequency were significantly greater, substantial work could be done in the oil.

Fig. 173, 174.
Fig. 173.Fig. 174.

The electrostatic attractions and repulsions between bodies of measurable dimensions are, of all the manifestations of this force, the first so-called electrical phenomena noted. But though they have been known to us for many centuries, the precise nature of the mechanism concerned in these actions is still unknown to us, and has not been even quite satisfactorily explained. What kind of mechanism must that be? We cannot help wondering when we observe two magnets attracting and repelling each other with a force of hundreds of pounds with apparently nothing between them. We have in our commercial dynamos magnets capable of sustaining in mid-air tons of weight. But what are even these[Pg 326] forces acting between magnets when compared with the tremendous attractions and repulsions produced by electrostatic force, to which there is apparently no limit as to intensity. In lightning discharges bodies are often charged to so high a potential that they are thrown away with inconceivable force and torn asunder or shattered into fragments. Still even such effects cannot compare with the attractions and repulsions which exist between charged molecules or atoms, and which are sufficient to project them with speeds of many kilometres a second, so that under their violent impact bodies are rendered highly incandescent and are volatilized. It is of special interest for the thinker who inquires into the nature of these forces to note that whereas the actions between individual molecules or atoms occur seemingly under any conditions, the attractions and repulsions of bodies of measurable dimensions imply a medium possessing insulating properties. So, if air, either by being rarefied or heated, is rendered more or less conducting, these actions between two electrified bodies practically cease, while the actions between the individual atoms continue to manifest themselves.

The electrostatic attractions and repulsions between objects of measurable size are, of all the examples of this force, the first so-called electrical phenomena we noticed. Even though we’ve known about them for centuries, the exact nature of the mechanism behind these actions is still a mystery to us and hasn’t been clearly explained. What kind of mechanism could that be? We can't help but wonder when we see two magnets attracting and repelling each other with a force of hundreds of pounds, seemingly with nothing in between them. In our commercial generators, there are magnets strong enough to hold tons of weight in mid-air. But what are these[Pg 326] forces between magnets compared to the immense attractions and repulsions created by electrostatic force, which seems to have no limit on its intensity? During lightning strikes, objects can be charged to such a high potential that they are thrown away with incredible force and can be torn apart or shattered into pieces. Yet even those effects can’t compare to the attractions and repulsions between charged molecules or atoms, which can propel them at speeds of many kilometers per second, causing violent impacts that make objects extremely hot and turn them into vapor. It’s particularly interesting for those who ponder the nature of these forces to note that while the interactions between individual molecules or atoms occur under almost any conditions, the attractions and repulsions of larger objects suggest a medium with insulating properties. So, if the air becomes more conducting by being rarefied or heated, the interactions between two electrically charged bodies practically stop, while the actions between individual atoms continue to be visible.

An experiment may serve as an illustration and as a means of bringing out other features of interest. Some time ago I showed that a lamp filament or wire mounted in a bulb and connected to one of the terminals of a high tension secondary coil is set spinning, the top of the filament generally describing a circle. This vibration was very energetic when the air in the bulb was at ordinary pressure and became less energetic when the air in the bulb was strongly compressed. It ceased altogether when the air was exhausted so as to become comparatively good conducting. I found at that time that no vibration took place when the bulb was very highly exhausted. But I conjectured that the vibration which I ascribed to the electrostatic action between the walls of the bulb and the filament should take place also in a highly exhausted bulb. To test this under conditions which were more favorable, a bulb like the one in Fig. 174, was constructed. It comprised a globe b, in the neck of which was sealed a platinum wire w carrying a thin lamp filament f. In the lower part of the globe a tube t was sealed so as to surround the filament. The exhaustion was carried as far as it was practicable with the apparatus employed.

An experiment can illustrate and highlight other interesting features. Some time ago, I demonstrated that a lamp filament or wire placed in a bulb and connected to one of the terminals of a high voltage secondary coil spins, with the top of the filament usually tracing a circle. This vibration was quite intense when the air in the bulb was at normal pressure but became less intense when the air was highly compressed. It completely stopped when the air was evacuated enough to allow for good conductivity. At that time, I found that no vibration occurred when the bulb was very highly evacuated. However, I speculated that the vibration, which I attributed to the electrostatic interaction between the bulb's walls and the filament, should happen in a highly evacuated bulb as well. To test this under more favorable conditions, a bulb like the one in Fig. 174 was created. It included a globe b, in the neck of which a platinum wire w was sealed, carrying a thin lamp filament f. In the lower part of the globe, a tube t was sealed around the filament. The evacuation was carried out as thoroughly as possible with the equipment used.

This bulb verified my expectation, for the filament was set spinning when the current was turned on, and became incandes[Pg 327]cent. It also showed another interesting feature, bearing upon the preceding remarks, namely, when the filament had been kept incandescent some time, the narrow tube and the space inside were brought to an elevated temperature, and as the gas in the tube then became conducting, the electrostatic attraction between the glass and the filament became very weak or ceased, and the filament came to rest. When it came to rest it would glow far more intensely. This was probably due to its assuming the position in the centre of the tube where the molecular bombardment was most intense, and also partly to the fact that the individual impacts were more violent and that no part of the supplied energy was converted into mechanical movement. Since, in accordance with accepted views, in this experiment the incandescence must be attributed to the impacts of the particles, molecules or atoms in the heated space, these particles must therefore, in order to explain such action, be assumed to behave as independent carriers of electric charges immersed in an insulating medium; yet there is no attractive force between the glass tube and the filament because the space in the tube is, as a whole, conducting.

This bulb confirmed my expectation; when the current was turned on, the filament started spinning and became incandescent. It also demonstrated another interesting feature related to the previous comments: after the filament had been kept incandescent for a while, the narrow tube and the space inside heated up, and when the gas in the tube became conductive, the electrostatic attraction between the glass and the filament weakened or disappeared, causing the filament to stop moving. When it stopped, it would glow much more brightly. This was likely because it settled in the center of the tube where the molecular bombardment was strongest, and also partly because the individual impacts were more forceful and no energy was being used for mechanical movement. Since, according to accepted views, the incandescence in this experiment must be attributed to the impacts of particles, molecules, or atoms in the heated space, these particles must be assumed to act as independent carriers of electric charges within an insulating medium. However, there is no attractive force between the glass tube and the filament because the space inside the tube is, in general, conductive.

It is of some interest to observe in this connection that whereas the attraction between two electrified bodies may cease owing to the impairing of the insulating power of the medium in which they are immersed, the repulsion between the bodies may still be observed. This may be explained in a plausible way. When the bodies are placed at some distance in a poorly conducting medium, such as slightly warmed or rarefied air, and are suddenly electrified, opposite electric charges being imparted to them, these charges equalize more or less by leakage through the air. But if the bodies are similarly electrified, there is less opportunity afforded for such dissipation, hence the repulsion observed in such case is greater than the attraction. Repulsive actions in a gaseous medium are however, as Prof. Crookes has shown, enhanced by molecular bombardment.

It's interesting to note that while the attraction between two charged bodies can stop due to the loss of insulating properties in the medium they're in, the repulsion between them can still be detected. This can be explained fairly simply. When the bodies are placed at a distance in a poorly conducting medium, like slightly warmed or thin air, and are suddenly charged with opposite electric charges, these charges tend to equalize somewhat through leakage into the air. However, if both bodies are charged similarly, there’s less chance for that dissipation to happen, and that's why the repulsion in this case is stronger than the attraction. As Prof. Crookes demonstrated, repulsive forces in a gas can be further intensified by molecular bombardment.

ON CURRENT OR DYNAMIC ELECTRICITY PHENOMENA.

So far, I have considered principally effects produced by a varying electrostatic force in an insulating medium, such as air. When such a force is acting upon a conducting body of measurable dimensions, it causes within the same, or on its surface, displacements of the electricity and gives rise to electric currents, and these produce another kind of phenomena, some of which I[Pg 328] shall presently endeavor to illustrate. In presenting this second class of electrical effects, I will avail myself principally of such as are producible without any return circuit, hoping to interest you the more by presenting these phenomena in a more or less novel aspect.

So far, I have mainly looked at the effects created by a changing electrostatic force in an insulating medium like air. When this force acts on a conducting object with measurable dimensions, it causes shifts in the electric charge within or on its surface, leading to electric currents. These currents create a different set of phenomena, some of which I[Pg 328] will soon attempt to explain. In discussing this second category of electrical effects, I will focus primarily on those that can occur without a return circuit, hoping to engage you more by presenting these phenomena in a somewhat new light.

It has been a long time customary, owing to the limited experience with vibratory currents, to consider an electric current as something circulating in a closed conducting path. It was astonishing at first to realize that a current may flow through the conducting path even if the latter be interrupted, and it was still more surprising to learn, that sometimes it may be even easier to make a current flow under such conditions than through a closed path. But that old idea is gradually disappearing, even among practical men, and will soon be entirely forgotten.

It has long been customary, due to limited experience with vibratory currents, to think of electric current as something that circulates in a closed conducting path. It was initially surprising to realize that a current can flow through the conducting path even if it's interrupted, and even more surprising to learn that sometimes it can be easier to create a current flow under those conditions than through a closed path. However, that old idea is gradually fading away, even among practical people, and will soon be completely forgotten.

Fig. 175. Fig. 175.

If I connect an insulated metal plate P, Fig. 175, to one of the terminals T of the induction coil by means of a wire, though this plate be very well insulated, a current passes through the wire when the coil is set to work. First I wish to give you evidence that there is a current passing through the connecting wire. An obvious way of demonstrating this is to insert between the terminal of the coil and the insulated plate a very thin platinum or german silver wire w and bring the latter to incandescence or fusion by the current. This requires a rather large plate or else current impulses of very high potential and frequency. Another way is to take a coil C, Fig. 175, containing many turns of thin insulated wire and to insert the same in the path of the current to the plate. When I connect one of the ends of the coil to the wire leading to another insulated plate P1, and its other end to the terminal T1 of the induction coil, and set the latter to work, a current passes through the inserted coil C and the existence of the current may be made manifest in various ways. For instance, I[Pg 329] insert an iron core i within the coil. The current being one of very high frequency, will, if it be of some strength, soon bring the iron core to a noticeably higher temperature, as the hysteresis and current losses are great with such high frequencies. One might take a core of some size, laminated or not, it would matter little; but ordinary iron wire 1/16th or 1/8th of an inch thick is suitable for the purpose. While the induction coil is working, a current traverses the inserted coil and only a few moments are sufficient to bring the iron wire i to an elevated temperature sufficient to soften the sealing-wax s, and cause a paper washer p fastened by it to the iron wire to fall off. But with the apparatus such as I have here, other, much more interesting, demonstrations of this kind can be made. I have a secondary S, Fig 176, of coarse wire, wound upon a coil similar to the first. In the preceding experiment the current through the coil C, Fig. 175, was very small, but there being many turns a strong heating effect was, nevertheless, produced in the iron wire. Had I passed that current through a conductor in order to show the heating of the latter, the current might have been too small to produce the effect desired. But with this coil provided with a secondary winding, I can now transform the feeble current of high tension which passes through the primary P into a strong secondary current of low tension, and this current will quite certainly do what I expect. In a small glass tube (t, Fig. 176), I have enclosed a coiled platinum wire, w, this merely in order to protect the wire. On each end of the glass tube is sealed a terminal of stout wire to which one of the ends of the platinum wire w, is connected. I join the terminals of the secondary coil to these terminals and insert the primary p, between the insulated plate P1, and the terminal T1, of the induction coil as before. The latter being set to work, instantly the platinum wire w is rendered incandescent and can be fused, even if it be very thick.

If I connect an insulated metal plate P, Fig. 175, to one of the terminals T of the induction coil using a wire, even if this plate is very well insulated, a current flows through the wire when the coil is activated. First, I want to show you that there is a current moving through the connecting wire. A clear way to demonstrate this is to place a very thin platinum or german silver wire w between the coil's terminal and the insulated plate, then heat it up or melt it with the current. This requires either a fairly large plate or current pulses of very high potential and frequency. Another method is to use a coil C, Fig. 175, made up of many turns of thin insulated wire and insert it in the current path to the plate. When I connect one end of the coil to the wire going to another insulated plate P1, and the other end to the terminal T1 of the induction coil, and then turn on the coil, a current travels through the inserted coil C, and we can show the existence of the current in various ways. For example, I [Pg 329] insert an iron core i into the coil. Since the current is very high frequency, it will quickly raise the temperature of the iron core if the current is strong enough, because hysteresis and current losses are significant at such frequencies. You could use a core of any reasonable size, whether laminated or not, but regular iron wire that's 1/16th or 1/8th of an inch thick will work well. While the induction coil is in operation, a current flows through the inserted coil, and it only takes a few moments to heat the iron wire i enough to soften the sealing-wax s, which causes a paper washer p attached to the iron wire to fall off. However, with the setup I have here, we can do many more interesting demonstrations. I have a secondary coil S, Fig 176, made of thicker wire, wound on a coil that’s similar to the first. In the previous experiment, the current through the coil C, Fig. 175, was very small, but since there are many turns, it still produced a strong heating effect in the iron wire. If I had passed that current through a conductor to show the heating effect, it might have been too weak to achieve the desired result. But with this coil and its secondary winding, I can now convert the weak high-voltage current that passes through the primary P into a strong low-voltage secondary current, which will definitely produce the effect I expect. Inside a small glass tube (t, Fig. 176), I've enclosed a coiled platinum wire w, just to protect it. Each end of the glass tube has a thick wire terminal sealed to it, to which one of the ends of the platinum wire w is attached. I connect the terminals of the secondary coil to these terminals and place the primary p between the insulated plate P1 and the terminal T1 of the induction coil as before. Once the coil is activated, the platinum wire w instantly glows and can even be melted, regardless of its thickness.

Fig. 176. Fig. 176.

Instead of the platinum wire I now take an ordinary 50-volt 16 c. p. lamp. When I set the induction coil in operation the lamp filament is brought to high incandescence. It is, however, not necessary to use the insulated plate, for the lamp (l, Fig. 177) is rendered incandescent even if the plate P1 be disconnected. The secondary may also be connected to the primary as indicated by the dotted line in Fig. 177, to do away more or less with the electrostatic induction or to modify the action otherwise.

Instead of using platinum wire, I'm now using a regular 50-volt 16 c. p. lamp. When I turn on the induction coil, the lamp's filament lights up brightly. However, it's not necessary to use the insulated plate, because the lamp (l, Fig. 177) still glows even if the plate P1 is disconnected. The secondary can also be connected to the primary as shown by the dotted line in Fig. 177, which helps reduce or change the electrostatic induction effects.

Fig. 177. Fig. 177.

I may here call attention to a number of interesting observations with the lamp. First, I disconnect one of the terminals of the lamp from the secondary S. When the induction coil plays, a glow is noted which fills the whole bulb. This glow is due to electrostatic induction. It increases when the bulb is grasped with the hand, and the capacity of the experimenter's body thus added to the secondary circuit. The secondary, in effect, is equivalent to a metallic coating, which would be placed near the primary. If the secondary, or its equivalent, the coating, were placed symmetrically to the primary, the electrostatic induction would be nil under ordinary conditions, that is, when a primary return circuit is used, as both halves would neutralize each other. The secondary is in fact placed symmetrically to the primary, but the action of both halves of the latter, when only one of its ends is connected to the induction coil, is not exactly equal; hence electrostatic induction takes place, and hence the glow in the bulb. I can nearly equalize the action of both halves of the primary by connecting the other, free end of the same to the insulated plate, as in the preceding experiment. When the plate is connected, the glow disappears. With a smaller plate it would not entirely disappear and then it would contribute to the brightness of the filament when the secondary is closed, by warming the air in the bulb.[Pg 331]

I want to highlight some interesting observations with the lamp. First, I disconnect one of the terminals of the lamp from the secondary S. When the induction coil is activated, a glow fills the entire bulb. This glow is caused by electrostatic induction. It gets brighter when I hold the bulb because my body adds to the capacity of the secondary circuit. The secondary acts like a metallic coating placed near the primary. If the secondary, or its equivalent, the coating, were positioned symmetrically to the primary, there would be no electrostatic induction under normal conditions, meaning when a primary return circuit is used, as both halves would cancel each other out. The secondary is actually positioned symmetrically to the primary, but the effect of both halves of the primary, when only one end is connected to the induction coil, isn’t exactly equal; thus, electrostatic induction occurs, leading to the glow in the bulb. I can nearly balance the effect of both halves of the primary by connecting the other, free end to the insulated plate, as in the previous experiment. When the plate is connected, the glow disappears. With a smaller plate, the glow wouldn’t completely vanish and would instead add to the brightness of the filament when the secondary is closed by warming the air in the bulb.[Pg 331]

Fig. 178a, 178b. Fig. 178a.     Fig. 178b.
Fig. 179a, 179b. Fig. 179a. Fig. 179b.

To demonstrate another interesting feature, I have adjusted the coils used in a certain way. I first connect both the terminals of the lamp to the secondary, one end of the primary being connected to the terminal T1 of the induction coil and the other to the insulated plate P1 as before. When the current is turned on, the lamp glows brightly, as shown in Fig. 178b, in which C is a fine wire coil and S a coarse wire secondary wound upon it. If the insulated plate P1 is disconnected, leaving one of the ends a of the primary insulated, the filament becomes dark or generally it diminishes in brightness (Fig. 178a). Connecting again the plate P1 and raising the frequency of the current, I make the filament quite dark or barely red (Fig. 179b). Once more I will disconnect the plate. One will of course infer that when the plate is disconnected, the current through the primary will be weakened, that therefore the e. m. f. will fall in the secondary S, and that the brightness of the lamp will diminish. This might be the case and the result can be secured by an easy adjustment of the [Pg 332]coils; also by varying the frequency and potential of the currents. But it is perhaps of greater interest to note, that the lamp increases in brightness when the plate is disconnected (Fig. 179a). In this case all the energy the primary receives is now sunk into it, like the charge of a battery in an ocean cable, but most of that energy is recovered through the secondary and used to light the lamp. The current traversing the primary is strongest at the end b which is connected to the terminal T1 of the induction coil, and diminishes in strength towards the remote end a. But the dynamic inductive effect exerted upon the secondary S is now greater than before, when the suspended plate was connected to the primary. These results might have been produced by a number of causes. For instance, the plate P1 being connected, the reaction from the coil C may be such as to diminish the potential at the terminal T1 of the induction coil, and therefore weaken the current through the primary of the coil C. Or the disconnecting[Pg 333] of the plate may diminish the capacity effect with relation to the primary of the latter coil to such an extent that the current through it is diminished, though the potential at the terminal T1 of the induction coil may be the same or even higher. Or the result might have been produced by the change of phase of the primary and secondary currents and consequent reaction. But the chief determining factor is the relation of the self-induction and capacity of coil C and plate P1 and the frequency of the currents. The greater brightness of the filament in Fig. 179a, is, however, in part due to the heating of the rarefied gas in the lamp by electrostatic induction, which, as before remarked, is greater when the suspended plate is disconnected.

To show another interesting feature, I've adjusted the coils in a specific way. First, I connect both terminals of the lamp to the secondary; one end of the primary is connected to terminal T1 of the induction coil, and the other to the insulated plate P1 like before. When the current is turned on, the lamp lights up brightly, as shown in Fig. 178b, where C is a fine wire coil and S is a coarse wire secondary wrapped around it. If I disconnect the insulated plate P1, leaving one end a of the primary insulated, the filament dims or generally loses brightness (Fig. 178a). After reconnecting the plate P1 and increasing the current's frequency, I make the filament very dim or barely red (Fig. 179b). Once again, I will disconnect the plate. It’s easy to conclude that when the plate is disconnected, the current in the primary will weaken, causing the e.m.f. in the secondary S to drop, leading to a decrease in the lamp's brightness. This could be true, and the result can be achieved through simple adjustments of the [Pg 332] coils, as well as by changing the frequency and voltage of the currents. However, it's perhaps more interesting to note that the lamp actually gets brighter when the plate is disconnected (Fig. 179a). In this case, all the energy the primary receives is now concentrated in it, similar to a battery's charge in an underwater cable, but most of that energy is reclaimed through the secondary and used to light the lamp. The current flowing through the primary is strongest at the end b that connects to terminal T1 of the induction coil, and it decreases in strength toward the far end a. But the dynamic inductive effect acting on the secondary S is now stronger than when the suspended plate was connected to the primary. These results could have been caused by several factors. For example, when the plate P1 is connected, the reaction from coil C may lower the potential at terminal T1 of the induction coil, thereby weakening the current in the primary of coil C. Alternatively, disconnecting the plate may reduce the capacitive effect related to the primary of the latter coil enough that the current through it decreases, although the potential at terminal T1 of the induction coil could remain the same or even increase. The result might also arise from a phase shift in the primary and secondary currents and the ensuing interaction. However, the main determining factor is the relationship between the self-induction and capacitance of coil C and plate P1 and the frequencies of the currents. The increased brightness of the filament in Fig. 179a is, nevertheless, partly due to the heating of the rarefied gas in the lamp from electrostatic induction, which, as noted before, is greater when the suspended plate is disconnected.

Still another feature of some interest I may here bring to your attention. When the insulated plate is disconnected and the secondary of the coil opened, by approaching a small object to the secondary, but very small sparks can be drawn from it, showing that the electrostatic induction is small in this case. But upon the secondary being closed upon itself or through the lamp, the filament glowing brightly, strong sparks are obtained from the secondary. The electrostatic induction is now much greater, because the closed secondary determines a greater flow of current through the primary and principally through that half of it which is connected to the induction coil. If now the bulb be grasped with the hand, the capacity of the secondary with reference to the primary is augmented by the experimenter's body and the luminosity of the filament is increased, the incandescence now being due partly to the flow of current through the filament and partly to the molecular bombardment of the rarefied gas in the bulb.

Here's another interesting feature I want to highlight. When the insulated plate is disconnected and the secondary of the coil is opened, if you bring a small object close to the secondary, you can only get very small sparks from it, indicating that the electrostatic induction is low in this case. However, when the secondary is closed on itself or through the lamp, and the filament glows brightly, you can get strong sparks from the secondary. The electrostatic induction is now much greater because the closed secondary allows for a stronger current flow through the primary, especially through the part connected to the induction coil. If you then hold the bulb in your hand, your body increases the capacity of the secondary in relation to the primary, making the filament brighter. The brightness is now due partly to the current flowing through the filament and partly to the molecular bombardment of the rarefied gas in the bulb.

The preceding experiments will have prepared one for the next following results of interest, obtained in the course of these investigations. Since I can pass a current through an insulated wire merely by connecting one of its ends to the source of electrical energy, since I can induce by it another current, magnetize an iron core, and, in short, perform all operations as though a return circuit were used, clearly I can also drive a motor by the aid of only one wire. On a former occasion I have described a simple form of motor comprising a single exciting coil, an iron core and disc. Fig. 180 illustrates a modified way of operating such an alternate current motor by currents induced in a transformer connected to one lead, and several other arrangements of circuits[Pg 334] for operating a certain class of alternating motors founded on the action of currents of differing phase. In view of the present state of the art it is thought sufficient to describe these arrangements in a few words only. The diagram, Fig. 180 II., shows a primary coil P, connected with one of its ends to the line L leading from a high tension transformer terminal T1. In inductive relation to this primary P is a secondary S of coarse wire in the circuit of which is a coil c. The currents induced in the secondary energize the iron core i, which is preferably, but not necessarily, subdivided, and set the metal disc d in rotation. Such a motor M2 as diagramatically shown in Fig. 180 II., has been called a "magnetic lag motor," but this expression may be objected to by those who attribute the rotation of the disc to eddy currents circulating in minute paths when the core i is finally subdivided. In order to operate such a motor effectively on the plan indicated, the frequencies should not be too high, not more than four or five thousand, though the rotation is produced even with ten thousand per second, or more.

The previous experiments should have set the stage for the next interesting results obtained during these investigations. Since I can pass a current through an insulated wire simply by connecting one end to a source of electrical energy, and since I can use it to induce another current, magnetize an iron core, and in short, perform all operations as if a return circuit were involved, it's clear that I can also drive a motor using just one wire. Previously, I described a straightforward motor that includes a single exciting coil, an iron core, and a disc. Fig. 180 shows a modified way to operate such an alternating current motor through currents induced in a transformer connected to one lead, along with several other circuit arrangements for controlling a specific class of alternating motors based on the action of currents with different phases. Given the current state of technology, it seems sufficient to briefly describe these arrangements. The diagram, Fig. 180 II., illustrates a primary coil P, connected at one end to the line L that leads from a high tension transformer terminal T1. In relation to this primary P is a secondary S made of coarse wire, which includes a coil c in its circuit. The currents induced in the secondary energize the iron core i, which is preferably, but not necessarily, subdivided, and causes the metal disc d to rotate. Such a motor M2, as shown in Fig. 180 II., has been referred to as a "magnetic lag motor," though some might object to this term, arguing that the rotation of the disc is due to eddy currents circulating in small paths when the core i is finally subdivided. To operate such a motor effectively in the suggested manner, the frequencies shouldn't be too high—no more than four or five thousand, though rotation can occur even at ten thousand per second or higher.

In Fig. 180 I., a motor M1 having two energizing circuits, A and B, is diagrammatically indicated. The circuit A is connected to the line L and in series with it is a primary P, which may have its free end connected to an insulated plate P1, such connection being indicated by the dotted lines. The other motor circuit B is connected to the secondary S which is in inductive relation to the primary P. When the transformer terminal T1 is alternately electrified, currents traverse the open line L and also circuit A and primary P. The currents through the latter induce secondary currents in the circuit S, which pass through the energizing coil B of the motor. The currents through the secondary S and those through the primary P differ in phase 90 degrees, or nearly so, and are capable of rotating an armature placed in inductive relation to the circuits A and B.

In Fig. 180 I., a motor M1 with two energizing circuits, A and B, is shown in a diagram. The circuit A connects to the line L, and in series with it is a primary P, which can have its free end attached to an insulated plate P1, as indicated by the dotted lines. The other motor circuit B connects to the secondary S, which is in inductive relation to the primary P. When the transformer terminal T1 is alternately powered, currents flow through the open line L as well as circuit A and primary P. The currents through the latter induce secondary currents in the circuit S, which flow through the energizing coil B of the motor. The currents in the secondary S and those in the primary P are out of phase by 90 degrees, or close to it, allowing them to rotate an armature placed in inductive relation to the circuits A and B.

In Fig. 180 III., a similar motor M3 with two energizing circuits A1 and B1 is illustrated. A primary P, connected with one of its ends to the line L has a secondary S, which is preferably wound for a tolerably high e. m. f., and to which the two energizing circuits of the motor are connected, one directly to the ends of the secondary and the other through a condenser C, by the action of which the currents traversing the circuit A1 and B1 are made to differ in phase.[Pg 335]

In Fig. 180 III., a similar motor M3 with two power circuits A1 and B1 is shown. A primary P, connected at one end to the line L, has a secondary S, which is ideally wound for a relatively high e. m. f., and to which the two power circuits of the motor are connected—one directly to the ends of the secondary and the other through a capacitor C, causing the currents flowing through circuits A1 and B1 to be out of phase.[Pg 335]

Fig. 180. Fig. 180. Fig. 181, 182.
Fig. 181.Fig. 182.

In Fig. 180 IV., still another arrangement is shown. In this case two primaries P1 and P2 are connected to the line L, one [Pg 336] through a condenser C of small capacity, and the other directly. The primaries are provided with secondaries S1 and S2 which are in series with the energizing circuits, A2 and B2 and a motor M3, the condenser C again serving to produce the requisite difference in the phase of the currents traversing the motor circuits. As such phase motors with two or more circuits are now well known in the art, they have been here illustrated diagrammatically. No difficulty whatever is found in operating a motor in the manner indicated, or in similar ways; and although such experiments up to this day present only scientific interest, they may at a period not far distant, be carried out with practical objects in view.

In Fig. 180 IV., another setup is shown. In this case, two primaries P1 and P2 are connected to the line L, one [Pg 336] through a small-capacity condenser C, and the other directly. The primaries have secondaries S1 and S2 that are in series with the energizing circuits, A2 and B2, and a motor M3, with the condenser C again creating the necessary phase difference in the currents running through the motor circuits. These phase motors with two or more circuits are now well-known in the field, and they have been illustrated here diagrammatically. There is no difficulty at all in operating a motor in this way or in similar ways; and although such experiments currently only hold scientific interest, they may soon be conducted with practical purposes in mind.

It is thought useful to devote here a few remarks to the subject of operating devices of all kinds by means of only one leading wire. It is quite obvious, that when high-frequency currents are made use of, ground connections are—at least when the e. m. f. of the currents is great—better than a return wire. Such ground connections are objectionable with steady or low frequency currents on account of destructive chemical actions of the former and disturbing influences exerted by both on the neighboring circuits; but with high frequencies these actions practically do not exist. Still, even ground connections become superfluous when the e. m. f. is very high, for soon a condition is reached, when the current may be passed more economically through open, than through closed, conductors. Remote as might seem an industrial application of such single wire transmission of energy to one not experienced in such lines of experiment, it will not seem so to anyone who for some time has carried on investigations of such nature. Indeed I cannot see why such a plan should not be practicable. Nor should it be thought that for carrying out such a plan currents of very high frequency are expressly required, for just as soon as potentials of say 30,000 volts are used, the single wire transmission may be effected with low frequencies, and experiments have been made by me from which these inferences are made.

It seems useful to take a moment to discuss the topic of operating devices of all kinds using just one leading wire. It's clear that when using high-frequency currents, ground connections are—at least when the voltage of the currents is high—better than a return wire. These ground connections are problematic with steady or low-frequency currents due to the harmful chemical reactions caused by the former and the disruptive influences both can have on nearby circuits; however, with high frequencies, these issues almost disappear. Still, even ground connections become unnecessary when the voltage is very high, as there comes a point when the current can be transmitted more efficiently through open conductors than through closed ones. Although it might seem far-fetched to apply single-wire energy transmission in industry to someone unfamiliar with such experiments, it wouldn’t be to anyone who has spent time investigating these matters. In fact, I don't see why this approach shouldn't be feasible. It's also important to note that very high-frequency currents aren't strictly necessary for this plan; as soon as voltages of around 30,000 volts are used, single-wire transmission can happen with low frequencies, and I have conducted experiments that support these conclusions.

When the frequencies are very high it has been found in laboratory practice quite easy to regulate the effects in the manner shown in diagram Fig. 181. Here two primaries P and P1 are shown, each connected with one of its ends to the line L and with the other end to the condenser plates C and C, respectively. Near these are placed other condenser plates C1 and C1, the former being connected to the line L and the latter to an insulated larger[Pg 337] plate P2. On the primaries are wound secondaries S and S1, of coarse wire, connected to the devices d and l respectively. By varying the distances of the condenser plates C and C1, and C and C1 the currents through the secondaries S and S1 are varied in intensity. The curious feature is the great sensitiveness, the slightest change in the distance of the plates producing considerable variations in the intensity or strength of the currents. The sensitiveness may be rendered extreme by making the frequency such, that the primary itself, without any plate attached to its free end, satisfies, in conjunction with the closed secondary, the condition of resonance. In such condition an extremely small change in the capacity of the free terminal produces great variations. For instance, I have been able to adjust the conditions so that the mere approach of a person to the coil produces a considerable change in the brightness of the lamps attached to the secondary. Such observations and experiments possess, of course, at present, chiefly scientific interest, but they may soon become of practical importance.

When the frequencies are really high, it's been found in lab practice that it's quite easy to control the effects as shown in diagram Fig. 181. Here, two primary coils, P and P1, are shown, each connected at one end to the line L and at the other end to the condenser plates C and C, respectively. Nearby are other condenser plates C1 and C1, with the former connected to the line L and the latter to a larger insulated plate P2. On the primary coils are wound secondaries S and S1, made of coarse wire, connected to devices d and l respectively. By changing the distances between the condenser plates C and C1, and C and C1, the currents flowing through the secondaries S and S1 vary in intensity. A fascinating aspect is the high sensitivity; even the slightest change in the distance of the plates can cause significant variations in the intensity or strength of the currents. The sensitivity can be made extremely high by adjusting the frequency so that the primary coil itself, without any plate attached to its free end, meets the resonance condition with the closed secondary. In this state, a very small change in the capacity of the free terminal leads to large variations. For example, I've been able to set it up so that just a person's approach to the coil causes a noticeable change in the brightness of the lamps connected to the secondary. These observations and experiments are mainly of scientific interest right now, but they could soon become practically important.

Very high frequencies are of course not practicable with motors on account of the necessity of employing iron cores. But one may use sudden discharges of low frequency and thus obtain certain advantages of high-frequency currents without rendering the iron core entirely incapable of following the changes and without entailing a very great expenditure of energy in the core. I have found it quite practicable to operate with such low frequency disruptive discharges of condensers, alternating-current motors. A certain class of such motors which I advanced a few years ago, which contain closed secondary circuits, will rotate quite vigorously when the discharges are directed through the exciting coils. One reason that such a motor operates so well with these discharges is that the difference of phase between the primary and secondary currents is 90 degrees, which is generally not the case with harmonically rising and falling currents of low frequency. It might not be without interest to show an experiment with a simple motor of this kind, inasmuch as it is commonly thought that disruptive discharges are unsuitable for such purposes. The motor is illustrated in Fig. 182. It comprises a rather large iron core i with slots on the top into which are embedded thick copper washers c c. In proximity to the core is a freely-movable metal disc D. The core is provided with a primary [Pg 338]exciting coil C1 the ends a and b of which are connected to the terminals of the secondary S of an ordinary transformer, the primary P of the latter being connected to an alternating distribution circuit or generator G of low or moderate frequency. The terminals of the secondary S are attached to a condenser C which discharges through an air gap d d which may be placed in series or shunt to the coil C1. When the conditions are properly chosen the disc D rotates with considerable effort and the iron core i does not get very perceptibly hot. With currents from a high-frequency alternator, on the contrary, the core gets rapidly hot and the disc rotates with a much smaller effort. To perform the experiment properly it should be first ascertained that the disc D is not set in rotation when the discharge is not occurring at d d. It is preferable to use a large iron core and a condenser of large capacity so as to bring the superimposed quicker oscillation to a very low pitch or to do away with it entirely. By observing certain elementary rules I have also found it practicable to operate ordinary series or shunt direct-current motors with such disruptive discharges, and this can be done with or without a return wire.

Very high frequencies aren't practical with motors because you need to use iron cores. However, you can use sudden discharges at low frequency to gain some benefits of high-frequency currents without making the iron core completely unable to keep up with the changes and without using a lot of energy in the core. I've found it totally feasible to operate alternating-current motors with these low-frequency disruptive discharges. A specific type of motor I introduced a few years ago, which features closed secondary circuits, spins quite well when the discharges flow through the exciting coils. One reason this motor works effectively with these discharges is that there's a 90-degree phase difference between the primary and secondary currents, which isn't usually the case with harmonically rising and falling low-frequency currents. It might be interesting to demonstrate an experiment with a simple motor like this, since it's commonly thought that disruptive discharges are not suitable for such applications. The motor is shown in Fig. 182. It has a relatively large iron core i with slots on top that hold thick copper washers c c. Near the core is a freely moving metal disc D. The core has a primary exciting coil C1 whose ends a and b connect to the terminals of the secondary S of a standard transformer, with the primary P of that transformer linked to an alternating distribution circuit or generator G of low to moderate frequency. The terminals of the secondary S connect to a condenser C that discharges through an air gap d d, which can be placed in series or parallel with the coil C1. When the conditions are set up correctly, the disc D spins with significant effort while the iron core i doesn't heat up much. In contrast, with currents from a high-frequency alternator, the core heats up quickly and the disc spins with much less effort. To carry out the experiment correctly, you should first make sure that the disc D doesn't start rotating when there's no discharge occurring at d d. It's best to use a large iron core and a condenser with a high capacity to minimize or eliminate the quick oscillations. By following certain basic guidelines, I've also successfully operated standard series or shunt direct-current motors with these disruptive discharges, which can be accomplished with or without a return wire.

IMPEDANCE PHENOMENA.

Among the various current phenomena observed, perhaps the most interesting are those of impedance presented by conductors to currents varying at a rapid rate. In my first paper before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, I have described a few striking observations of this kind. Thus I showed that when such currents or sudden discharges are passed through a thick metal bar there may be points on the bar only a few inches apart, which have a sufficient potential difference between them to maintain at bright incandescence an ordinary filament lamp. I have also described the curious behavior of rarefied gas surrounding a conductor, due to such sudden rushes of current. These phenomena have since been more carefully studied and one or two novel experiments of this kind are deemed of sufficient interest to be described here.

Among the various phenomena we see today, perhaps the most fascinating are the impedance effects that conductors have on rapidly changing currents. In my first paper presented to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, I described some striking observations related to this. I demonstrated that when such currents or sudden discharges pass through a thick metal bar, there can be points on the bar just a few inches apart that have a significant potential difference between them, enough to keep a regular filament lamp glowing brightly. I also discussed the unusual behavior of rarefied gas surrounding a conductor due to these sudden surges of current. These phenomena have since been studied in more detail, and a couple of novel experiments in this area are considered interesting enough to be shared here.

Referring to Fig. 183a, B and B1 are very stout copper bars connected at their lower ends to plates C and C1, respectively, of a condenser, the opposite plates of the latter being connected to the terminals of the secondary S of a high-tension transformer, the primary P of which is supplied with alternating currents from an ordinary low-frequency dynamo G or distribution circuit. The[Pg 339] condenser discharges through an adjustable gap d d as usual. By establishing a rapid vibration it was found quite easy to perform the following curious experiment. The bars B and B1 were joined at the top by a low-voltage lamp l3; a little lower was placed by means of clamps c c, a 50-volt lamp l2; and still lower another 100-volt lamp l1; and finally, at a certain distance below the latter lamp, an exhausted tube T. By carefully determining the positions of these devices it was found practicable to maintain them all at their proper illuminating power. Yet they were all connected in multiple arc to the two stout copper bars and required widely different pressures. This experiment requires of course some time for adjustment but is quite easily performed.

Referring to Fig. 183a, B and B1 are thick copper bars connected at their lower ends to plates C and C1, respectively, of a condenser. The opposite plates of the condenser are connected to the terminals of the secondary S of a high-tension transformer, whose primary P is powered by alternating currents from a standard low-frequency dynamo G or distribution circuit. The[Pg 339] condenser discharges through an adjustable gap d d, as usual. By creating a rapid vibration, it was quite easy to conduct the following interesting experiment. The bars B and B1 were connected at the top by a low-voltage lamp l3; a little lower down, a 50-volt lamp l2 was secured using clamps c c; and even lower was another 100-volt lamp l1; finally, at a specific distance below the last lamp, there was an exhausted tube T. By carefully arranging the positions of these devices, it was possible to keep them all at their appropriate brightness. Despite being connected in multiple arcs to the two thick copper bars and requiring significantly different voltages, this experiment needs some time for adjustment but can be performed fairly easily.

Fig. 183a, 183b and 183c. Figs. 183a, 183b, and 183c.

In Figs. 183b and 183c, two other experiments are illustrated which, unlike the previous experiment, do not require very careful [Pg 340]adjustments. In Fig. 183b, two lamps, l1 and l2, the former a 100-volt and the latter a 50-volt are placed in certain positions as indicated, the 100-volt lamp being below the 50-volt lamp. When the arc is playing at d d and the sudden discharges are passed through the bars B B1, the 50-volt lamp will, as a rule, burn brightly, or at least this result is easily secured, while the 100-volt lamp will burn very low or remain quite dark, Fig. 183b. Now the bars B B1 may be joined at the top by a thick cross bar B2 and it is quite easy to maintain the 100-volt lamp at full candle-power while the 50-volt lamp remains dark, Fig. 183c. These results, as I have pointed out previously, should not be considered to be due exactly to frequency but rather to the time rate of change which may be great, even with low frequencies. A great many other results of the same kind, equally interesting, especially to those who are only used to manipulate steady currents, may be obtained and they afford precious clues in investigating the nature of electric currents.

In Figs. 183b and 183c, two additional experiments are shown that, unlike the previous one, don’t need very precise adjustments. In Fig. 183b, there are two lamps, l1 and l2, with the first being a 100-volt lamp and the second a 50-volt lamp, positioned as indicated, with the 100-volt lamp placed below the 50-volt lamp. When the arc is active at d d and the sudden discharges flow through the bars B B1, the 50-volt lamp usually shines brightly, or at least that’s an easy result to achieve, while the 100-volt lamp shines very dimly or stays almost dark, as shown in Fig. 183b. Now, the bars B B1 can be connected at the top with a thick cross bar B2, allowing you to easily keep the 100-volt lamp fully lit while the 50-volt lamp remains dark, as depicted in Fig. 183c. These outcomes, as I’ve mentioned before, shouldn’t be attributed strictly to frequency but rather to the rate of change over time, which can be significant even at low frequencies. Many other similar and equally intriguing results, especially for those who are only familiar with steady currents, can be obtained, providing valuable insights into understanding electric currents.

In the preceding experiments I have already had occasion to show some light phenomena and it would now be proper to study these in particular; but to make this investigation more complete I think it necessary to make first a few remarks on the subject of electrical resonance which has to be always observed in carrying out these experiments.

In the earlier experiments, I've already had the chance to demonstrate some light phenomena, and now it’s fitting to focus on these in detail. However, to make this investigation more thorough, I believe it's important to first say a few things about electrical resonance, which always has to be considered when conducting these experiments.

ON ELECTRICAL RESONANCE.

The effects of resonance are being more and more noted by engineers and are becoming of great importance in the practical operation of apparatus of all kinds with alternating currents. A few general remarks may therefore be made concerning these effects. It is clear, that if we succeed in employing the effects of resonance practically in the operation of electric devices the return wire will, as a matter of course, become unnecessary, for the electric vibration may be conveyed with one wire just as well as, and sometimes even better than, with two. The question first to answer is, then, whether pure resonance effects are producible. Theory and experiment both show that such is impossible in Nature, for as the oscillation becomes more and more vigorous, the losses in the vibrating bodies and environing media rapidly increase and necessarily check the vibration which otherwise would go on increasing forever. It is a fortunate circumstance that pure resonance is not producible, for if it were there is no telling what dangers might not lie in wait for the innocent experimenter. But to a[Pg 341] certain degree resonance is producible, the magnitude of the effects being limited by the imperfect conductivity and imperfect elasticity of the media or, generally stated, by frictional losses. The smaller these losses, the more striking are the effects. The same is the case in mechanical vibration. A stout steel bar may be set in vibration by drops of water falling upon it at proper intervals; and with glass, which is more perfectly elastic, the resonance effect is still more remarkable, for a goblet may be burst by singing into it a note of the proper pitch. The electrical resonance is the more perfectly attained, the smaller the resistance or the impedance of the conducting path and the more perfect the dielectric. In a Leyden jar discharging through a short stranded cable of thin wires these requirements are probably best fulfilled, and the resonance effects are therefore very prominent. Such is not the case with dynamo machines, transformers and their circuits, or with commercial apparatus in general in which the presence of iron cores complicates the action or renders it impossible. In regard to Leyden jars with which resonance effects are frequently demonstrated, I would say that the effects observed are often attributed but are seldom due to true resonance, for an error is quite easily made in this respect. This may be undoubtedly demonstrated by the following experiment. Take, for instance, two large insulated metallic plates or spheres which I shall designate A and B; place them at a certain small distance apart and charge them from a frictional or influence machine to a potential so high that just a slight increase of the difference of potential between them will cause the small air or insulating space to break down. This is easily reached by making a few preliminary trials. If now another plate—fastened on an insulating handle and connected by a wire to one of the terminals of a high tension secondary of an induction coil, which is maintained in action by an alternator (preferably high frequency)—is approached to one of the charged bodies A or B, so as to be nearer to either one of them, the discharge will invariably occur between them; at least it will, if the potential of the coil in connection with the plate is sufficiently high. But the explanation of this will soon be found in the fact that the approached plate acts inductively upon the bodies A and B and causes a spark to pass between them. When this spark occurs, the charges which were previously imparted to these bodies from the influence machine, must needs be lost, since the bodies are brought in electri[Pg 342]cal connection through the arc formed. Now this arc is formed whether there be resonance or not. But even if the spark would not be produced, still there is an alternating e. m. f. set up between the bodies when the plate is brought near one of them; therefore the approach of the plate, if it does not always actually, will, at any rate, tend to break down the air space by inductive action. Instead of the spheres or plates A and B we may take the coatings of a Leyden jar with the same result, and in place of the machine,—which is a high frequency alternator preferably, because it is more suitable for the experiment and also for the argument,—we may take another Leyden jar or battery of jars. When such jars are discharging through a circuit of low resistance the same is traversed by currents of very high frequency. The plate may now be connected to one of the coatings of the second jar, and when it is brought near to the first jar just previously charged to a high potential from an influence machine, the result is the same as before, and the first jar will discharge through a small air space upon the second being caused to discharge. But both jars and their circuits need not be tuned any closer than a basso profundo is to the note produced by a mosquito, as small sparks will be produced through the air space, or at least the latter will be considerably more strained owing to the setting up of an alternating e. m. f. by induction, which takes place when one of the jars begins to discharge. Again another error of a similar nature is quite easily made. If the circuits of the two jars are run parallel and close together, and the experiment has been performed of discharging one by the other, and now a coil of wire be added to one of the circuits whereupon the experiment does not succeed, the conclusion that this is due to the fact that the circuits are now not tuned, would be far from being safe. For the two circuits act as condenser coatings and the addition of the coil to one of them is equivalent to bridging them, at the point where the coil is placed, by a small condenser, and the effect of the latter might be to prevent the spark from jumping through the discharge space by diminishing the alternating e. m. f. acting across the same. All these remarks, and many more which might be added but for fear of wandering too far from the subject, are made with the pardonable intention of cautioning the unsuspecting student, who might gain an entirely unwarranted opinion of his skill at seeing every experiment succeed; but they are in no way thrust upon the experienced as novel observations.[Pg 343]

The effects of resonance are increasingly recognized by engineers and are becoming very important in the practical use of devices of all types that operate with alternating currents. Therefore, a few general comments can be made about these effects. It's clear that if we can use resonance effects practically in the operation of electric devices, the return wire will naturally become unnecessary, as electric vibrations can be transmitted with one wire just as effectively, and sometimes even better than, with two. The first question to answer is whether pure resonance effects can be created. Both theory and experiment show that this is impossible in nature because, as the oscillation becomes more vigorous, the losses in the vibrating bodies and surrounding media quickly rise and inevitably limit the vibration that would otherwise continue to grow indefinitely. It is fortunate that pure resonance cannot be produced, as there is no telling what dangers might await the unsuspecting experimenter if it were possible. However, to a certain degree, resonance can be produced, with the magnitude of the effects limited by the imperfect conductivity and elasticity of the media, or more generally, by frictional losses. The smaller these losses, the more pronounced the effects. The same applies to mechanical vibration. A sturdy steel bar can be made to vibrate by drops of water falling on it at the right intervals; with glass, which is more elastic, the resonance effect is even more remarkable, as a goblet can be shattered by singing a note of the right pitch into it. Electrical resonance is achieved more perfectly when the resistance or impedance of the conducting path is low and the dielectric is high quality. In a Leyden jar discharging through a short, stranded cable of thin wires, these conditions are probably best met, making the resonance effects very noticeable. This is not the case with dynamo machines, transformers, and their circuits, or with commercial devices in general, where the presence of iron cores complicates the action or makes it impossible. Regarding Leyden jars, which are frequently used to demonstrate resonance effects, I would say that the observed effects are often attributed to true resonance but are seldom actually due to it, as an error can easily occur in this regard. This can be clearly demonstrated with the following experiment. Take, for example, two large insulated metal plates or spheres, which I'll call A and B; place them a small distance apart and charge them from a frictional or influence machine to a potential high enough that a slight increase in the potential difference between them will cause the small air gap or insulating space to break down. This can be easily achieved with a few preliminary trials. If another plate, attached to an insulating handle and connected by a wire to one of the terminals of a high tension secondary of an induction coil, which is powered by an alternator (preferably high frequency), is brought near one of the charged bodies A or B, a discharge will invariably occur between them; at least it will if the potential of the coil in connection with the plate is sufficiently high. The explanation for this can be found in the fact that the approached plate acts inductively on the bodies A and B, causing a spark to jump between them. When this spark occurs, the charges previously transferred to these bodies from the influence machine are lost, as the bodies are brought into electrical connection through the arc formed. This arc forms whether resonance is present or not. But even if the spark does not occur, there is still an alternating e.m.f. set up between the bodies when the plate is brought close to one of them; thus, the approach of the plate, even if it does not always actually occur, will at least tend to break down the air gap through inductive action. Instead of plates A and B, we could use the coatings of a Leyden jar with the same result, and instead of the machine—which is preferably a high frequency alternator for this experiment and argument—we could use another Leyden jar or a battery of jars. When these jars discharge through a circuit with low resistance, it carries currents of very high frequency. The plate can now be connected to one of the coatings of the second jar, and when it is brought close to the first jar, which was previously charged to a high potential from an influence machine, the result is the same as before, and the first jar will discharge through a small air gap when the second discharges. However, both jars and their circuits don't need to be tuned any more closely than a deep bass is to the note produced by a mosquito, as small sparks will form across the air gap, or at least this space will be significantly more stressed due to the alternating e.m.f. induced when one of the jars begins to discharge. Another similar error can easily occur. If the circuits of the two jars are arranged in parallel and placed close together, and if the experiment has been conducted to discharge one through the other, then adding a coil of wire to one of the circuits will result in the experiment failing, the conclusion that this is due to the circuits not being tuned correctly would be misleading. For the two circuits act as capacitor coatings, and adding the coil to one of them is like bridging them, at the point where the coil is added, with a small capacitor. The effect of this capacitor could be to prevent the spark from jumping through the discharge gap by reducing the alternating e.m.f. acting across it. All these comments, and many more that could be added but for fear of straying too far from the topic, are made with the understandable intention of cautioning the unsuspecting student, who might develop an unwarranted confidence in their ability to see every experiment succeed; but they are not intended as new insights for the experienced.

In order to make reliable observations of electric resonance effects it is very desirable, if not necessary, to employ an alternator giving currents which rise and fall harmonically, as in working with make and break currents the observations are not always trustworthy, since many phenomena, which depend on the rate of change, may be produced with widely different frequencies. Even when making such observations with an alternator one is apt to be mistaken. When a circuit is connected to an alternator there are an indefinite number of values for capacity and self-induction which, in conjunction, will satisfy the condition of resonance. So there are in mechanics an infinite number of tuning forks which will respond to a note of a certain pitch, or loaded springs which have a definite period of vibration. But the resonance will be most perfectly attained in that case in which the motion is effected with the greatest freedom. Now in mechanics, considering the vibration in the common medium—that is, air—it is of comparatively little importance whether one tuning fork be somewhat larger than another, because the losses in the air are not very considerable. One may, of course, enclose a tuning fork in an exhausted vessel and by thus reducing the air resistance to a minimum obtain better resonant action. Still the difference would not be very great. But it would make a great difference if the tuning fork were immersed in mercury. In the electrical vibration it is of enormous importance to arrange the conditions so that the vibration is effected with the greatest freedom. The magnitude of the resonance effect depends, under otherwise equal conditions, on the quantity of electricity set in motion or on the strength of the current driven through the circuit. But the circuit opposes the passage of the currents by reason of its impedance and therefore, to secure the best action it is necessary to reduce the impedance to a minimum. It is impossible to overcome it entirely, but merely in part, for the ohmic resistance cannot be overcome. But when the frequency of the impulses is very great, the flow of the current is practically determined by self-induction. Now self-induction can be overcome by combining it with capacity. If the relation between these is such, that at the frequency used they annul each other, that is, have such values as to satisfy the condition of resonance, and the greatest quantity of electricity is made to flow through the external circuit, then the best result is obtained. It is simpler and safer to join the condenser in series with the self-induction. It is clear that in such[Pg 344] combinations there will be, for a given frequency, and considering only the fundamental vibration, values which will give the best result, with the condenser in shunt to the self-induction coil; of course more such values than with the condenser in series. But practical conditions determine the selection. In the latter case in performing the experiments one may take a small self-induction and a large capacity or a small capacity and a large self-induction, but the latter is preferable, because it is inconvenient to adjust a large capacity by small steps. By taking a coil with a very large self-induction the critical capacity is reduced to a very small value, and the capacity of the coil itself may be sufficient. It is easy, especially by observing certain artifices, to wind a coil through which the impedance will be reduced to the value of the ohmic resistance only; and for any coil there is, of course, a frequency at which the maximum current will be made to pass through the coil. The observation of the relation between self-induction, capacity and frequency is becoming important in the operation of alternate current apparatus, such as transformers or motors, because by a judicious determination of the elements the employment of an expensive condenser becomes unnecessary. Thus it is possible to pass through the coils of an alternating current motor under the normal working conditions the required current with a low e. m. f. and do away entirely with the false current, and the larger the motor, the easier such a plan becomes practicable; but it is necessary for this to employ currents of very high potential or high frequency.

To make reliable observations of electric resonance effects, it's really desirable, if not essential, to use an alternator that produces currents that rise and fall harmonically. This is because when working with make-and-break currents, the observations can often be unreliable since many phenomena that depend on the rate of change can occur at widely different frequencies. Even when using an alternator, mistakes can happen. When a circuit is connected to an alternator, there are countless combinations of capacitance and self-induction that can satisfy the resonance condition. Just like in mechanics, there are an infinite number of tuning forks that will respond to a certain pitch or loaded springs that have a set period of vibration. However, the best resonance occurs when the motion is allowed to happen with the greatest freedom. In mechanics, regarding vibrations in the common medium, like air, the difference in size between tuning forks isn't that important because air resistance is relatively low. You can enclose a tuning fork in a vacuum to minimize air resistance for better resonant action, but the improvement wouldn't be significant. However, if the tuning fork were immersed in mercury, that would make a big difference. In electrical vibrations, it’s crucial to arrange the conditions so that vibrations happen as freely as possible. The strength of the resonance effect depends, under otherwise equal conditions, on the amount of electricity set in motion or the strength of the current flowing through the circuit. But the circuit's impedance resists the current flow, so to achieve optimal performance, it's necessary to minimize that impedance. While it can’t be completely eliminated, it can be partially reduced since ohmic resistance can't be entirely overcome. However, at very high frequencies, the current flow is mainly determined by self-induction. Self-induction can be countered by combining it with capacitance. If the ratio between the two is such that they cancel each other out at the operating frequency, meaning they meet the resonance condition and allow the maximum amount of electricity to flow through the external circuit, then the best results are achieved. It’s easier and safer to connect the capacitor in series with the self-induction. It's evident that in these combinations, for a given frequency—and focusing only on the fundamental vibration—there are values that yield the best results with the capacitor in parallel to the self-induction coil; of course, there are more such values than when the capacitor is in series. Practical conditions will determine the choice. In the latter scenario, during experiments, you could use a small self-induction with a large capacitance or a small capacitance with a large self-induction, but the latter is preferred since adjusting a large capacitance in small increments can be cumbersome. By using a coil with very high self-induction, the critical capacitance is reduced to a small value, and the coil's own capacitance may even suffice. It's relatively easy, especially with certain techniques, to wind a coil that reduces the impedance to match just the ohmic resistance value. For any coil, there's certainly a frequency at which the maximum current can pass through it. Understanding how self-induction, capacitance, and frequency relate is becoming vital for operating alternating current devices, such as transformers or motors. By wisely determining these elements, the need for an expensive capacitor can be eliminated. This way, it's possible to have the necessary current flow through the coils of an alternating current motor under normal working conditions with a low e.m.f. and completely eliminate reactive current; and the larger the motor, the more feasible this approach becomes, though it requires high potential or high-frequency currents.

Fig. 184. Fig. 184.

In Fig. 184 I. is shown a plan which has been followed in the study of the resonance effects by means of a high frequency alternator. C1 is a coil of many turns, which is divided into small separate sections for the purpose of adjustment. The final adjustment was made sometimes with a few thin iron wires (though this is not always advisable) or with a closed secondary. The coil[Pg 345] C1 is connected with one of its ends to the line L from the alternator G and with the other end to one of the plates c of a condenser c c1, the plate (c1) of the latter being connected to a much larger plate P1. In this manner both capacity and self-induction were adjusted to suit the dynamo frequency.

In Fig. 184, I shows a plan that was used to study resonance effects with a high-frequency alternator. C1 is a coil with many turns, divided into small sections for adjustment. The final adjustments were sometimes made with a few thin iron wires (although this isn't always recommended) or with a closed secondary. The coil C1 is connected at one end to the line L from the alternator G and at the other end to one of the plates c of a capacitor c c1, with the plate (c1) of the capacitor connected to a much larger plate P1. This way, both capacitance and self-induction were adjusted to match the dynamo frequency.

As regards the rise of potential through resonant action, of course, theoretically, it may amount to anything since it depends on self-induction and resistance and since these may have any value. But in practice one is limited in the selection of these values and besides these, there are other limiting causes. One may start with, say, 1,000 volts and raise the e. m. f. to 50 times that value, but one cannot start with 100,000 and raise it to ten times that value because of the losses in the media which are great, especially if the frequency is high. It should be possible to start with, for instance, two volts from a high or low frequency circuit of a dynamo and raise the e. m. f. to many hundred times that value. Thus coils of the proper dimensions might be connected each with only one of its ends to the mains from a machine of low e. m. f., and though the circuit of the machine would not be closed in the ordinary acceptance of the term, yet the machine might be burned out if a proper resonance effect would be obtained. I have not been able to produce, nor have I observed with currents from a dynamo machine, such great rises of potential. It is possible, if not probable, that with currents obtained from apparatus containing iron the disturbing influence of the latter is the cause that these theoretical possibilities cannot be realized. But if such is the case I attribute it solely to the hysteresis and Foucault current losses in the core. Generally it was necessary to transform upward, when the e. m. f. was very low, and usually an ordinary form of induction coil was employed, but sometimes the arrangement illustrated in Fig. 184 II., has been found to be convenient. In this case a coil C is made in a great many sections, a few of these being used as a primary. In this manner both primary and secondary are adjustable. One end of the coil is connected to the line L1 from the alternator, and the other line L is connected to the intermediate point of the coil. Such a coil with adjustable primary and secondary will be found also convenient in experiments with the disruptive discharge. When true resonance is obtained the top of the wave must of course be on the free end of the coil as, for instance, at the terminal of the phosphorescence bulb B. This is[Pg 346] easily recognized by observing the potential of a point on the wire w near to the coil.

Regarding the increase in potential through resonant action, theoretically, it could be anything since it relies on self-induction and resistance, which can have any value. However, in practice, there's a limit to the selection of these values, and there are additional factors that restrict this. For example, one might start with 1,000 volts and amplify the e.m.f. to 50 times that amount, but you can't begin with 100,000 volts and increase it to ten times that amount due to significant losses in the medium, especially at high frequencies. It's feasible to start with, say, two volts from a high or low-frequency dynamo circuit and increase the e. m. f. to several hundred times that value. Therefore, coils of the right size could be connected with just one end linked to the output of a low e. m. f. machine, and even if the circuit of the machine isn't closed in the usual sense, the machine could still burn out if the right resonance effect is achieved. I haven't been able to create, nor have I seen, such significant increases in potential with currents from a dynamo machine. It’s possible, if not likely, that when using currents from equipment containing iron, the disruptive influence of iron prevents these theoretical possibilities from being realized. If that’s the case, I attribute it solely to hysteresis and Eddy current losses in the core. Generally, it was necessary to step up the voltage when the e.m.f. was quite low, and typically a standard induction coil was used. However, sometimes the setup shown in Fig. 184 II. has proven useful. In this setup, coil C is made in many sections, with a few of these used as a primary. This way, both the primary and secondary are adjustable. One end of the coil is connected to line L1 from the alternator, while the other line L is linked to the midpoint of the coil. Such a coil, with adjustable primary and secondary, is also handy for experiments with disruptive discharge. When true resonance is achieved, the peak of the wave must obviously be at the free end of the coil, for instance, at the terminal of the phosphorescence bulb B. This is[Pg 346] easily identified by checking the potential at a point on the wire w close to the coil.

In connection with resonance effects and the problem of transmission of energy over a single conductor which was previously considered, I would say a few words on a subject which constantly fills my thoughts and which concerns the welfare of all. I mean the transmission of intelligible signals or perhaps even power to any distance without the use of wires. I am becoming daily more convinced of the practicability of the scheme; and though I know full well that the great majority of scientific men will not believe that such results can be practically and immediately realized, yet I think that all consider the developments in recent years by a number of workers to have been such as to encourage thought and experiment in this direction. My conviction has grown so strong, that I no longer look upon this plan of energy or intelligence transmission as a mere theoretical possibility, but as a serious problem in electrical engineering, which must be carried out some day. The idea of transmitting intelligence without wires is the natural outcome of the most recent results of electrical investigations. Some enthusiasts have expressed their belief that telephony to any distance by induction through the air is possible. I cannot stretch my imagination so far, but I do firmly believe that it is practicable to disturb by means of powerful machines the electrostatic condition of the earth and thus transmit intelligible signals and perhaps power. In fact, what is there against the carrying out of such a scheme? We now know that electric vibration may be transmitted through a single conductor. Why then not try to avail ourselves of the earth for this purpose? We need not be frightened by the idea of distance. To the weary wanderer counting the mile-posts the earth may appear very large, but to that happiest of all men, the astronomer, who gazes at the heavens and by their standard judges the magnitude of our globe, it appears very small. And so I think it must seem to the electrician, for when he considers the speed with which an electric disturbance is propagated through the earth all his ideas of distance must completely vanish.

In relation to resonance effects and the issue of transmitting energy over a single conductor that we've discussed before, I want to share some thoughts on a topic that's always on my mind and affects everyone. I'm talking about sending clear signals—or maybe even power—over long distances without wires. I'm becoming more and more convinced that this idea is feasible. Although I know that most scientists won't believe such results can be achieved practically and immediately, I think they all acknowledge that recent developments by various researchers have been encouraging for exploring this path. My belief has become so strong that I no longer see this plan for transmitting energy or information as just a theoretical possibility; instead, I view it as an important challenge in electrical engineering that will need to be addressed someday. The concept of sending information without wires naturally follows from the latest findings in electrical research. Some enthusiasts claim that long-distance telephony via induction through air is possible. I can’t imagine that far, but I do strongly believe that using powerful machines to alter the earth's electrostatic state could enable us to send understandable signals and possibly power. In fact, what’s stopping us from pursuing such a plan? We now know that electric vibrations can be sent through a single conductor. So why not use the earth for this purpose? We shouldn’t be scared by the idea of distance. To a tired traveler counting the mile markers, the earth may seem huge, but to the happiest of all people, the astronomer, who looks at the sky and judges our planet’s size by that standard, it seems pretty small. I think that's how it appears to the electrician, too, because when he thinks about how fast electrical disturbances spread through the earth, all his notions of distance must vanish.

A point of great importance would be first to know what is the capacity of the earth? and what charge does it contain if electrified? Though we have no positive evidence of a charged body existing in space without other oppositely electrified bodies being near, there is a fair probability that the earth is such a body, for[Pg 347] by whatever process it was separated from other bodies—and this is the accepted view of its origin—it must have retained a charge, as occurs in all processes of mechanical separation. If it be a charged body insulated in space its capacity should be extremely small, less than one-thousandth of a farad. But the upper strata of the air are conducting, and so, perhaps, is the medium in free space beyond the atmosphere, and these may contain an opposite charge. Then the capacity might be incomparably greater. In any case it is of the greatest importance to get an idea of what quantity of electricity the earth contains. It is difficult to say whether we shall ever acquire this necessary knowledge, but there is hope that we may, and that is, by means of electrical resonance. If ever we can ascertain at what period the earth's charge, when disturbed, oscillates with respect to an oppositely electrified system or known circuit, we shall know a fact possibly of the greatest importance to the welfare of the human race. I propose to seek for the period by means of an electrical oscillator, or a source of alternating electric currents. One of the terminals of the source would be connected to earth as, for instance, to the city water mains, the other to an insulated body of large surface. It is possible that the outer conducting air strata, or free space, contain an opposite charge and that, together with the earth, they form a condenser of very large capacity. In such case the period of vibration may be very low and an alternating dynamo machine might serve for the purpose of the experiment. I would then transform the current to a potential as high as it would be found possible and connect the ends of the high tension secondary to the ground and to the insulated body. By varying the frequency of the currents and carefully observing the potential of the insulated body and watching for the disturbance at various neighboring points of the earth's surface resonance might be detected. Should, as the majority of scientific men in all probability believe, the period be extremely small, then a dynamo machine would not do and a proper electrical oscillator would have to be produced and perhaps it might not be possible to obtain such rapid vibrations. But whether this be possible or not, and whether the earth contains a charge or not, and whatever may be its period of vibration, it certainly is possible—for of this we have daily evidence—to produce some electrical disturbance sufficiently powerful to be perceptible by suitable instruments at any point of the earth's surface.[Pg 348]

It's crucial to first understand the earth's capacity and what charge it holds if it's electrified. While we don't have direct evidence of a charged body in space existing without nearby oppositely charged bodies, there's a good chance that the earth is one of those bodies. According to the widely accepted theory of its origin, it must have retained a charge, similar to what happens during mechanical separation processes. If the earth is an insulated charged body in space, its capacity should be very small, less than one-thousandth of a farad. However, the upper layers of the atmosphere are conductive, and possibly even the medium in free space beyond our atmosphere could contain an opposite charge. This could significantly increase the earth's capacity. It's extremely important to understand the amount of electricity the earth holds. It’s hard to say if we will ever obtain this knowledge, but there is hope, particularly through the use of electrical resonance. If we can find out how the earth's charge oscillates when disturbed in relation to an oppositely charged system or known circuit, it could reveal something crucial for humanity's welfare. I plan to search for the oscillation period using an electrical oscillator or a source of alternating electric currents. One terminal of this source would connect to the earth—like the city water mains—while the other would go to a large insulated surface. It's possible that the outer conducting air layers or free space have an opposite charge, and together with the earth, they might act as a large capacitor. In that case, the vibration period could be very low, and an alternating dynamo machine could work for this experiment. I would then convert the current to its highest possible potential and link the high-tension ends to the ground and the insulated body. By changing the current frequency and closely monitoring the potential of the insulated body while checking for disturbances at various nearby points on the earth's surface, we might detect resonance. If, as most scientists probably believe, the period is extremely small, then a dynamo machine wouldn’t suffice, and we would need to create a proper electrical oscillator, which may be challenging to achieve due to the rapid vibrations. Regardless of whether this is achievable or if the earth holds a charge—or what its vibration period might be—it's definitely possible, as evidenced daily, to create an electrical disturbance strong enough to be detected by suitable instruments anywhere on the earth's surface.[Pg 348]

Fig. 185. Fig. 185.

Assume that a source of alternating current S be connected, as in Fig. 185, with one of its terminals to earth (conveniently to the water mains) and with the other to a body of large surface P. When the electric oscillation is set up there will be a movement of electricity in and out of P, and alternating currents will pass through the earth, converging to, or diverging from, the point C where the ground connection is made. In this manner neighboring points on the earth's surface within a certain radius will be disturbed. But the disturbance will diminish with the distance, and the distance at which the effect will still be perceptible will depend on the quantity of electricity set in motion. Since the body P is insulated, in order to displace a considerable quantity, the potential of the source must be excessive, since there would be limitations as to the surface of P. The conditions might be adjusted so that the generator or source S will set up the same electrical movement as though its circuit were closed. Thus it is certainly practicable to impress an electric vibration at least of a certain low period upon the earth by means of proper machinery. At what distance such a vibration might be made perceptible can only be conjectured. I have on another occasion considered the question how the earth might behave to electric disturbances. There is no doubt that, since in such an experiment the electrical density at the surface could be but extremely small considering the size of the earth, the air would not act as a very disturbing factor, and there would be not much energy lost through the action of the air, which would be the case if the density were great. Theoretically, then, it could not require a great amount of energy to produce a disturbance perceptible at great distance, or even all over the surface of the globe. Now, it is quite certain that at any point within a certain radius of the source S a properly adjusted self-induction and capacity device can be set in action by resonance. But not only can this be done, but another source [Pg 349] S1, Fig. 185, similar to S, or any number of such sources, can be set to work in synchronism with the latter, and the vibration thus intensified and spread over a large area, or a flow of electricity produced to or from the source S1 if the same be of opposite phase to the source S. I think that beyond doubt it is possible to operate electrical devices in a city through the ground or pipe system by resonance from an electrical oscillator located at a central point. But the practical solution of this problem would be of incomparably smaller benefit to man than the realization of the scheme of transmitting intelligence, or perhaps power, to any distance through the earth or environing medium. If this is at all possible, distance does not mean anything. Proper apparatus must first be produced by means of which the problem can be attacked and I have devoted much thought to this subject. I am firmly convinced that it can be done and hope that we shall live to see it done.

Assume that an alternating current source S is connected, as shown in Fig. 185, with one of its terminals grounded (conveniently to the water mains) and the other connected to a large surface body P. When the electric oscillation starts, electricity will move in and out of P, and alternating currents will flow through the ground, converging to or diverging from point C, where the ground connection is made. This will disturb neighboring points on the earth’s surface within a certain radius. However, the disturbance will decrease with distance, and how far the effect remains noticeable will depend on the amount of electricity activated. As the body P is insulated, a substantial displacement requires a high potential from the source, since there are limits to the surface area of P. The conditions can be adjusted so that the generator or source S creates the same electrical movement as if its circuit were closed. Thus, it is certainly possible to induce an electric vibration of at least a certain low frequency in the earth using appropriate machinery. The distance at which such a vibration could be detectable can only be guessed. I have previously considered how the earth might respond to electric disturbances. There’s no doubt that, since the electrical density at the surface in such an experiment would be minimal when compared to the size of the earth, air wouldn’t significantly interfere, and not much energy would be lost to air resistance, which would occur if the density were high. Theoretically, it wouldn’t take a significant amount of energy to create a disturbance that could be detected at great distances, or even over the entire globe. It is clear that at any point within a certain radius of source S, a properly adjusted self-induction and capacitance device can be activated through resonance. Not only can this happen, but another source S1, Fig. 185, similar to S, or any number of such sources, can be synchronized with the first, amplifying the vibration and spreading it over a larger area, or generating a flow of electricity to or from source S1 if it is out of phase with source S. I firmly believe that it’s possible to operate electrical devices in a city using the ground or piping system through resonance from a central electrical oscillator. However, the practical application of this idea would provide far less benefit compared to realizing a method for transmitting information, or perhaps energy, over any distance through the earth or surrounding medium. If this is at all feasible, distance becomes irrelevant. Proper equipment must first be developed to tackle this issue, and I have given a lot of thought to this topic. I am convinced it can be done and hope to see it achieved in our lifetime.

ON THE LIGHT PHENOMENA PRODUCED BY HIGH-FREQUENCY CURRENTS OF HIGH POTENTIAL AND GENERAL REMARKS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT.

Returning now to the light effects which it has been the chief object to investigate, it is thought proper to divide these effects into four classes: 1. Incandescence of a solid. 2. Phosphorescence. 3. Incandescence or phosphorescence of a rarefied gas; and 4. Luminosity produced in a gas at ordinary pressure. The first question is: How are these luminous effects produced? In order to answer this question as satisfactorily as I am able to do in the light of accepted views and with the experience acquired, and to add some interest to this demonstration, I shall dwell here upon a feature which I consider of great importance, inasmuch as it promises, besides, to throw a better light upon the nature of most of the phenomena produced by high-frequency electric currents. I have on other occasions pointed out the great importance of the presence of the rarefied gas, or atomic medium in general, around the conductor through which alternate currents of high frequency are passed, as regards the heating of the conductor by the currents. My experiments, described some time ago, have shown that, the higher the frequency and potential difference of the currents, the more important becomes the rarefied gas in which the conductor is immersed, as a factor of the heating. The potential difference, however, is, as I then pointed out, a more im[Pg 350]portant element than the frequency. When both of these are sufficiently high, the heating may be almost entirely due to the presence of the rarefied gas. The experiments to follow will show the importance of the rarefied gas, or, generally, of gas at ordinary or other pressure as regards the incandescence or other luminous effects produced by currents of this kind.

Returning now to the light effects that have been the main focus of our investigation, it's appropriate to categorize these effects into four types: 1. Incandescence of a solid. 2. Phosphorescence. 3. Incandescence or phosphorescence of a rarefied gas; and 4. Luminosity generated in a gas at normal pressure. The first question is: How are these luminous effects created? To answer this question as best as I can based on accepted theories and my acquired experience, and to make this demonstration more engaging, I’ll focus on an aspect I believe is crucial because it may provide better insight into the nature of most phenomena caused by high-frequency electric currents. I have previously emphasized the significance of having a rarefied gas or an atomic medium surrounding the conductor through which alternating high-frequency currents pass, particularly regarding how these currents heat the conductor. My earlier experiments showed that the higher the frequency and voltage of the currents, the more critical the rarefied gas becomes in which the conductor is placed as a factor in heating. However, voltage is, as I previously noted, a more significant element than frequency. When both of these parameters are sufficiently high, the heating can be nearly entirely attributed to the presence of the rarefied gas. The experiments that follow will demonstrate the significance of the rarefied gas, or generally, gas at normal or other pressures concerning the incandescence or other luminous effects created by these currents.

I take two ordinary 50-volt 16 c. p. lamps which are in every respect alike, with the exception, that one has been opened at the top and the air has filled the bulb, while the other is at the ordinary degree of exhaustion of commercial lamps. When I attach the lamp which is exhausted to the terminal of the secondary of the coil, which I have already used, as in experiments illustrated in Fig. 179a for instance, and turn on the current, the filament, as you have before seen, comes to high incandescence. When I attach the second lamp, which is filled with air, instead of the former, the filament still glows, but much less brightly. This experiment illustrates only in part the truth of the statements before made. The importance of the filament's being immersed in rarefied gas is plainly noticeable but not to such a degree as might be desirable. The reason is that the secondary of this coil is wound for low tension, having only 150 turns, and the potential difference at the terminals of the lamp is therefore small. Were I to take another coil with many more turns in the secondary, the effect would be increased, since it depends partially on the potential difference, as before remarked. But since the effect likewise depends on the frequency, it maybe properly stated that it depends on the time rate of the variation of the potential difference. The greater this variation, the more important becomes the gas as an element of heating. I can produce a much greater rate of variation in another way, which, besides, has the advantage of doing away with the objections, which might be made in the experiment just shown, even if both the lamps were connected in series or multiple arc to the coil, namely, that in consequence of the reactions existing between the primary and secondary coil the conclusions are rendered uncertain. This result I secure by charging, from an ordinary transformer which is fed from the alternating current supply station, a battery of condensers, and discharging the latter directly through a circuit of small self-induction, as before illustrated in Figs. 183a, 183b, and 183c.

I have two identical 50-volt 16 c. p. lamps that are exactly the same, except one has been opened at the top and has air inside, while the other is at the typical vacuum level of commercial lamps. When I connect the exhausted lamp to the secondary terminal of the coil I've already used, as shown in experiments like Fig. 179a, and turn on the current, the filament, as you’ve seen before, lights up intensely. When I connect the second lamp, filled with air, instead of the first, the filament still glows, but not as brightly. This experiment only partially confirms previous statements. The significance of the filament being in a rarefied gas is clear, but perhaps not as pronounced as one might hope. This is because the secondary of this coil is configured for low voltage, with only 150 turns, resulting in a small potential difference at the lamp's terminals. If I used a coil with many more turns in the secondary, the effect would be enhanced since it partially relies on the potential difference, as previously noted. However, since the effect also relies on the frequency, it can be accurately said that it depends on the rate at which the potential difference changes. The greater this change, the more crucial the gas becomes for heating. I can achieve a much higher rate of variation using a different method, which also eliminates potential objections to the earlier experiment, even if both lamps were connected in series or parallel to the coil. This objection arises because reactions between the primary and secondary coils can make conclusions uncertain. I achieve this result by charging a bank of capacitors from a standard transformer that receives power from the alternating current supply station, and then discharging it directly through a circuit of low self-induction, as previously shown in Figs. 183a, 183b, and 183c.

Fig. 186a, 186b, 186c.
Fig. 186a.Fig. 186b.Fig. 186c.

In Figs. 186a, 186b and 186c, the heavy copper bars B B1, are [Pg 351]connected to the opposite coatings of a battery of condensers, or generally in such way, that the high frequency or sudden discharges are made to traverse them. I connect first an ordinary 50-volt incandescent lamp to the bars by means of the clamps c c. The discharges being passed through the lamp, the filament is rendered incandescent, though the current through it is very small, and would not be nearly sufficient to produce a visible effect under the conditions of ordinary use of the lamp. Instead of this I now attach to the bars another lamp exactly like the first, but with the seal broken off, the bulb being therefore filled with air at ordinary pressure. When the discharges are directed through the filament, as before, it does not become incandescent. But the result might still be attributed to one of the many possible reactions. I therefore connect both the lamps in multiple arc as illustrated in Fig. 186a. Passing the discharges through both the lamps, again the filament in the exhausted lamp l glows very brightly while that in the non-exhausted lamp l1 remains dark, as previously. But it should not be thought that the latter lamp is taking only a small fraction of the energy supplied to both the lamps; on the contrary, it may consume a considerable portion of the energy and it may become even hotter than the one which burns brightly. In this experiment the potential difference at the terminals of the lamps varies in sign theoretically three to four million times a second. The ends of the filaments are correspondingly electrified, and the gas in the bulbs is violently agitated and a large portion of the supplied energy is thus converted into heat. In the non-exhausted bulb, there being a few million times more gas molecules than in the exhausted one, the bombardment, which is most violent at the ends of the filament, in the neck of the bulb, consumes a[Pg 352] large portion of the energy without producing any visible effect. The reason is that, there being many molecules, the bombardment is quantitatively considerable, but the individual impacts are not very violent, as the speeds of the molecules are comparatively small owing to the small free path. In the exhausted bulb, on the contrary, the speeds are very great, and the individual impacts are violent and therefore better adapted to produce a visible effect. Besides, the convection of heat is greater in the former bulb. In both the bulbs the current traversing the filaments is very small, incomparably smaller than that which they require on an ordinary low-frequency circuit. The potential difference, however, at the ends of the filaments is very great and might be possibly 20,000 volts or more, if the filaments were straight and their ends far apart. In the ordinary lamp a spark generally occurs between the ends of the filament or between the platinum wires outside, before such a difference of potential can be reached.

In Figs. 186a, 186b, and 186c, the heavy copper bars B B1 are [Pg 351]connected to opposite sides of a battery of capacitors, or generally arranged so that high-frequency or sudden discharges pass through them. I first connect a regular 50-volt incandescent bulb to the bars using the clamps c c. When the discharges go through the bulb, the filament lights up, even though the current in it is very small and wouldn’t be enough to create a visible effect under normal use conditions. Instead, I now attach another bulb exactly like the first one, but with the seal broken, meaning the bulb is filled with air at regular pressure. When the discharges move through the filament as before, it doesn’t light up. However, this result could still be attributed to one of several possible reactions. So, I connect both bulbs in a multiple arc as shown in Fig. 186a. Running the discharges through both bulbs, the filament in the exhausted bulb l glows brightly while the one in the non-exhausted bulb l1 stays dark, as before. But it shouldn't be assumed that the latter bulb only uses a tiny fraction of the energy supplied to both bulbs; on the contrary, it can consume a significant amount of energy and can even get hotter than the one that glows brightly. In this experiment, the potential difference at the terminals of the bulbs theoretically changes its sign three to four million times per second. The ends of the filaments are correspondingly charged, and the gas inside the bulbs is violently stirred, converting a large amount of the supplied energy into heat. In the non-exhausted bulb, there are a few million times more gas molecules than in the exhausted one, making the bombardment, which is most intense at the ends of the filament and in the neck of the bulb, consume a[Pg 352]large portion of the energy without any visible effect. The reason is that, with many molecules, the bombardment is significant, but the individual collisions aren’t very forceful, as the speeds of the molecules are relatively low due to the short free path. In the exhausted bulb, on the other hand, the speeds are very high, and the individual impacts are forceful and therefore more likely to create a visible effect. Additionally, the heat convection is greater in the former bulb. In both bulbs, the current passing through the filaments is very small, incomparably less than what they need in a normal low-frequency circuit. However, the potential difference at the ends of the filaments is very high, possibly over 20,000 volts, if the filaments are straight and their ends are far apart. In a regular bulb, a spark usually occurs between the ends of the filament or between the platinum wires outside before such a potential difference can be reached.

It might be objected that in the experiment before shown the lamps, being in multiple arc, the exhausted lamp might take a much larger current and that the effect observed might not be exactly attributable to the action of the gas in the bulbs. Such objections will lose much weight if I connect the lamps in series, with the same result. When this is done and the discharges are directed through the filaments, it is again noted that the filament in the non-exhausted bulb l1, remains dark, while that in the exhausted one (l) glows even more intensely than under its normal conditions of working, Fig. 186b. According to general ideas the current through the filaments should now be the same, were it not modified by the presence of the gas around the filaments.

It might be argued that in the previously shown experiment, the lamps being in multiple arcs could cause the exhausted lamp to draw a much larger current, and that the observed effect might not be entirely due to the action of the gas in the bulbs. These objections become less significant if I connect the lamps in series and achieve the same result. When this is done and the discharges flow through the filaments, it is again observed that the filament in the non-exhausted bulb l1 remains dark, while the one in the exhausted bulb (l) glows even more brightly than under normal operating conditions, as shown in Fig. 186b. According to common understanding, the current through the filaments should now be the same unless it is altered by the presence of the gas surrounding the filaments.

At this juncture I may point out another interesting feature, which illustrates the effect of the rate of change of potential of the currents. I will leave the two lamps connected in series to the bars B B1, as in the previous experiment, Fig. 186b, but will presently reduce considerably the frequency of the currents, which was excessive in the experiment just before shown. This I may do by inserting a self-induction coil in the path of the discharges, or by augmenting the capacity of the condensers. When I now pass these low-frequency discharges through the lamps, the exhausted lamp l again is as bright as before, but it is noted [Pg 353]also that the non-exhausted lamp l1 glows, though not quite as intensely as the other. Reducing the current through the lamps, I may bring the filament in the latter lamp to redness, and, though the filament in the exhausted lamp l is bright, Fig. 186c, the degree of its incandescence is much smaller than in Fig. 186b, when the currents were of a much higher frequency.

At this point, I want to highlight another interesting aspect that shows the impact of the change rate of the potential in the currents. I'll keep the two lamps connected in series to the bars B B1, just like in the previous experiment, Fig. 186b, but I will now significantly reduce the frequency of the currents, which was too high in the last experiment. I can do this by adding a self-induction coil in the discharge path or by increasing the capacity of the capacitors. When I now pass these low-frequency discharges through the lamps, the exhausted lamp l is bright again, but it's also noted that the non-exhausted lamp l1 glows, though not quite as brightly as the other. By reducing the current through the lamps, I can bring the filament in the latter lamp to a red glow, and while the filament in the exhausted lamp l is bright, Fig. 186c, its level of brightness is much less than in Fig. 186b, when the currents had a much higher frequency.

In these experiments the gas acts in two opposite ways in determining the degree of the incandescence of the filaments, that is, by convection and bombardment. The higher the frequency and potential of the currents, the more important becomes the bombardment. The convection on the contrary should be the smaller, the higher the frequency. When the currents are steady there is practically no bombardment, and convection may therefore with such currents also considerably modify the degree of incandescence and produce results similar to those just before shown. Thus, if two lamps exactly alike, one exhausted and one not exhausted, are connected in multiple arc or series to a direct-current machine, the filament in the non-exhausted lamp will require a considerably greater current to be rendered incandescent. This result is entirely due to convection, and the effect is the more prominent the thinner the filament. Professor Ayrton and Mr. Kilgour some time ago published quantitative results concerning the thermal emissivity by radiation and convection in which the effect with thin wires was clearly shown. This effect may be strikingly illustrated by preparing a number of small, short, glass tubes, each containing through its axis the thinnest obtainable platinum wire. If these tubes be highly exhausted, a number of them may be connected in multiple arc to a direct-current machine and all of the wires may be kept at incandescence with a smaller current than that required to render incandescent a single one of the wires if the tube be not exhausted. Could the tubes be so highly exhausted that convection would be nil, then the relative amounts of heat given off by convection and radiation could be determined without the difficulties attending thermal quantitative measurements. If a source of electric impulses of high frequency and very high potential is employed, a still greater number of the tubes may be taken and the wires rendered incandescent by a current not capable of warming perceptibly a wire of the same size immersed in air at ordinary pressure, and conveying the energy to all of them.

In these experiments, the gas influences the level of brightness of the filaments in two opposite ways: through convection and bombardment. The higher the frequency and potential of the currents, the more significant the bombardment becomes. Conversely, the convection should decrease as the frequency increases. When the currents are steady, there is virtually no bombardment, allowing convection, under such conditions, to significantly alter the level of brightness and produce similar results to those shown earlier. For example, if two identical lamps, one vacuum-sealed and one not, are connected in parallel or series to a direct-current machine, the filament in the non-vacuum lamp will need a much larger current to glow. This outcome is solely due to convection, and the effect is more pronounced with thinner filaments. Professor Ayrton and Mr. Kilgour published quantitative findings some time ago regarding thermal emissivity from radiation and convection, clearly demonstrating the effect with thin wires. This can be dramatically illustrated by preparing several small, short glass tubes, each containing the thinnest platinum wire possible through its center. If these tubes are well-vacuumed, multiple tubes can be connected in parallel to a direct-current machine, and all the wires can be kept glowing with a lower current than what is needed to make a single wire glow if its tube isn't vacuum-sealed. If the tubes could be vacuumed to the point where convection is negligible, the relative amounts of heat released through convection and radiation could be measured without the complications of thermal quantitative measurements. Using a source of high-frequency electrical impulses with very high potential, even more tubes can be used, and the wires can glow with a current that wouldn't heat a wire of the same size submerged in air at normal pressure while delivering energy to all of them.

I may here describe a result which is still more interesting, and to which I have been led by the observation of these phe[Pg 354]nomena. I noted that small differences in the density of the air produced a considerable difference in the degree of incandescence of the wires, and I thought that, since in a tube, through which a luminous discharge is passed, the gas is generally not of uniform density, a very thin wire contained in the tube might be rendered incandescent at certain places of smaller density of the gas, while it would remain dark at the places of greater density, where the convection would be greater and the bombardment less intense. Accordingly a tube t was prepared, as illustrated in Fig. 187, which contained through the middle a very fine platinum wire w. The tube was exhausted to a moderate degree and it was found that when it was attached to the terminal of a high-frequency coil the platinum wire w would indeed, become incandescent in patches, as illustrated in Fig. 187. Later a number of these tubes with one or more wires were prepared, each showing this result. The effect was best noted when the striated discharge occurred in the tube, but was also produced when the striæ were not visible, showing that, even then, the gas in the tube was not of uniform density. The position of the striæ was generally such, that the rarefactions corresponded to the places of incandescence or greater brightness on the wire w. But in a few instances it was noted, that the bright spots on the wire were covered by the dense parts of the striated discharge as indicated by l in Fig. 187, though the effect was barely perceptible. This was explained in a plausible way by assuming that the convection was not widely different in the dense and rarefied places, and that the bombardment was greater on the dense places of the striated discharge. It is, in fact, often observed in bulbs, that under certain conditions a thin wire is brought to higher incandescence when the air is not too highly rarefied. This is the case when the potential of the coil is not high enough for the vacuum, but the result may be attributed to many different causes. In all cases this curious phenomenon of incandescence disappears when the tube, or rather the wire, acquires throughout a uniform temperature.

I can describe an even more interesting result that came from observing these phenomena. I noticed that small differences in air density caused a significant difference in the brightness of the wires. I thought that since the gas in a tube through which a luminous discharge flows isn’t usually of uniform density, a very thin wire inside the tube might glow in certain spots where the gas is less dense, while remaining dark in the areas of higher density where the convection is stronger and the bombardment is less intense. So, a tube t was created, as shown in Fig. 187, containing a very fine platinum wire w in the middle. The tube was moderately evacuated, and it was found that when connected to a high-frequency coil, the platinum wire w did indeed light up in patches, as illustrated in Fig. 187. Later, more tubes with one or more wires were made, all showing this effect. The effect was most noticeable when the striated discharge occurred in the tube, but it also happened when the striations weren't visible, indicating that the gas in the tube still had uneven density. The position of the striations generally corresponded with the areas of brightness on the wire w. However, in a few cases, the bright spots on the wire were obscured by the denser parts of the striated discharge, as indicated by l in Fig. 187, although the effect was barely noticeable. This was likely explained by suggesting that convection wasn’t significantly different in the dense and rarefied areas, and that bombardment was greater in the dense areas of the striated discharge. In fact, it’s often seen in bulbs that under certain conditions, a thin wire can glow more brightly when the air isn’t too rarefied. This happens when the coil’s potential isn’t high enough for the vacuum, but various factors can contribute to this outcome. In all cases, this strange phenomenon of incandescence disappears when the tube, or specifically the wire, achieves a uniform temperature throughout.

Fig. 187, 188.
Fig. 187.Fig. 188.

Disregarding now the modifying effect of convection there are then two distinct causes which determine the incandescence of a wire or filament with varying currents, that is, conduction current and bombardment. With steady currents we have to deal only with the former of these two causes, and the heating effect is a minimum, since the resistance is least to steady flow. When the current is a varying one the resistance is greater, and hence [Pg 355]the heating effect is increased. Thus if the rate of change of the current is very great, the resistance may increase to such an extent that the filament is brought to incandescence with inappreciable currents, and we are able to take a short and thick block of carbon or other material and bring it to bright incandescence with a current incomparably smaller than that required to bring to the same degree of incandescence an ordinary thin lamp filament with a steady or low frequency current. This result is important, and illustrates how rapidly our views on these subjects are changing, and how quickly our field of knowledge is extending. In the art of incandescent lighting, to view this result in one aspect only, it has been commonly considered as an essential requirement for practical success, that the lamp filament should be thin and of high resistance. But now we know that the resistance of the filament to the steady flow does not mean anything; the filament might as well be short and thick; for if it be immersed in rarefied gas it will become incandescent by the passage of a small current. It all depends on the frequency and potential of the currents. We may conclude from this, that it [Pg 356]would be of advantage, so far as the lamp is considered, to employ high frequencies for lighting, as they allow the use of short and thick filaments and smaller currents.

Disregarding the effects of convection for now, there are two main factors that cause a wire or filament to glow with different currents: conduction current and bombardment. With steady currents, we only need to consider the first factor, and the heating effect is minimal because the resistance is low with a steady flow. However, when the current varies, the resistance increases, which raises the heating effect. If the rate of change in the current is very high, the resistance can increase to the point where the filament glows even with very small currents. This means we can use a short, thick piece of carbon or another material and make it glow brightly with a current much smaller than what you'd need for a standard thin lamp filament at a steady or low-frequency current. This finding is significant and shows how quickly our understanding of these topics is evolving and how fast our knowledge is expanding. In incandescent lighting, it has traditionally been viewed as essential for success that the lamp filament be thin and have high resistance. But now we understand that the steady flow resistance of the filament doesn't really matter; it could just as easily be short and thick. If it's surrounded by rarefied gas, it will glow with a small current. It all hinges on the frequency and voltage of the currents. From this, we can conclude that it would be beneficial for the lamp if we used high frequencies for lighting since they allow for shorter, thicker filaments and lower currents.

If a wire or filament be immersed in a homogeneous medium, all the heating is due to true conduction current, but if it be enclosed in an exhausted vessel the conditions are entirely different. Here the gas begins to act and the heating effect of the conduction current, as is shown in many experiments, may be very small compared with that of the bombardment. This is especially the case if the circuit is not closed and the potentials are of course very high. Suppose that a fine filament enclosed in an exhausted vessel be connected with one of its ends to the terminal of a high tension coil and with its other end to a large insulated plate. Though the circuit is not closed, the filament, as I have before shown, is brought to incandescence. If the frequency and potential be comparatively low, the filament is heated by the current passing through it. If the frequency and potential, and principally the latter, be increased, the insulated plate need be but very small, or may be done away with entirely; still the filament will become incandescent, practically all the heating being then due to the bombardment. A practical way of combining both the effects of conduction currents and bombardment is illustrated in Fig. 188, in which an ordinary lamp is shown provided with a very thin filament which has one of the ends of the latter connected to a shade serving the purpose of the insulated plate, and the other end to the terminal of a high tension source. It should not be thought that only rarefied gas is an important factor in the heating of a conductor by varying currents, but gas at ordinary pressure may become important, if the potential difference and frequency of the currents is excessive. On this subject I have already stated, that when a conductor is fused by a stroke of lightning, the current through it may be exceedingly small, not even sufficient to heat the conductor perceptibly, were the latter immersed in a homogeneous medium.

If a wire or filament is placed in a uniform medium, all the heating comes from the true conduction current. However, if it's enclosed in a vacuum, the situation changes completely. In this case, the gas starts to react, and the heating effect from the conduction current, as shown in numerous experiments, can be very small compared to that caused by bombardment. This is particularly true if the circuit is open and the potentials are very high. Imagine a thin filament in a vacuum connected at one end to a high voltage coil and at the other end to a large insulated plate. Even though the circuit is open, the filament, as I've shown earlier, glows. If the frequency and potential are relatively low, the filament is heated by the current passing through it. If both the frequency and potential, especially the latter, are increased, the insulated plate can be very small or even eliminated entirely; nonetheless, the filament will still glow, with almost all the heating coming from bombardment. A practical example of combining both conduction current effects and bombardment is shown in Fig. 188, where a regular lamp is equipped with a very thin filament. One end of the filament connects to a shade that acts as the insulated plate, while the other end connects to a high voltage source. It shouldn't be assumed that only low-pressure gas is significant in heating a conductor with varying currents; even gas at normal pressure can become significant if the potential difference and frequency of the currents are too high. I've previously mentioned that when a conductor is fused by a lightning strike, the current flowing through it can be extremely small, not even enough to heat the conductor noticeably if it were in a uniform medium.

From the preceding it is clear that when a conductor of high resistance is connected to the terminals of a source of high frequency currents of high potential, there may occur considerable dissipation of energy, principally at the ends of the conductor, in consequence of the action of the gas surrounding the conductor. Owing to this, the current through a section of the conductor at a point midway between its ends may be much smaller than [Pg 357]through a section near the ends. Furthermore, the current passes principally through the outer portions of the conductor, but this effect is to be distinguished from the skin effect as ordinarily interpreted, for the latter would, or should, occur also in a continuous incompressible medium. If a great many incandescent lamps are connected in series to a source of such currents, the lamps at the ends may burn brightly, whereas those in the middle may remain entirely dark. This is due principally to bombardment, as before stated. But even if the currents be steady, provided the difference of potential is very great, the lamps at the end will burn more brightly than those in the middle. In such case there is no rhythmical bombardment, and the result is produced entirely by leakage. This leakage or dissipation into space when the tension is high, is considerable when incandescent lamps are used, and still more considerable with arcs, for the latter act like flames. Generally, of course, the dissipation is much smaller with steady, than with varying, currents.

From the previous discussion, it's evident that when a conductor with high resistance is connected to the terminals of a high-frequency, high-potential current source, there can be significant energy loss, mainly at the ends of the conductor, due to the effect of the gas surrounding it. Because of this, the current at a point halfway along the conductor may be much lower than [Pg 357] at a section closer to the ends. Additionally, the current mainly flows through the outer parts of the conductor, but this should not be confused with the skin effect as typically understood, since the skin effect would also occur in a continuous, incompressible medium. If many incandescent lamps are connected in series to such a current source, the lamps at the ends may glow brightly, while those in the middle could remain completely dark. This is mainly due to bombardment, as mentioned earlier. However, even if the currents are steady, if the potential difference is very high, the end lamps will shine brighter than those in the middle. In this case, there is no rhythmic bombardment, and the result is entirely caused by leakage. This leakage or energy loss into space, when the voltage is high, is significant when using incandescent lamps and even more so with arcs, as the latter behave like flames. Generally, energy loss is much less with steady currents than with fluctuating ones.

I have contrived an experiment which illustrates in an interesting manner the effect of lateral diffusion. If a very long tube is attached to the terminal of a high frequency coil, the luminosity is greatest near the terminal and falls off gradually towards the remote end. This is more marked if the tube is narrow.

I have set up an experiment that interestingly shows how lateral diffusion works. When a very long tube is connected to the end of a high-frequency coil, the brightness is highest near the end and gradually decreases toward the far end. This effect is more pronounced if the tube is narrow.

A small tube about one-half inch in diameter and twelve inches long (Fig. 189), has one of its ends drawn out into a fine fibre f nearly three feet long. The tube is placed in a brass socket T which can be screwed on the terminal T1 of the induction coil. The discharge passing through the tube first illuminates the bottom of the same, which is of comparatively large section; but through the long glass fibre the discharge cannot pass. But gradually the rarefied gas inside becomes warmed and more conducting and the discharge spreads into the glass fibre. This spreading is so slow, that it may take half a minute or more until the discharge has worked through up to the top of the glass fibre, then presenting the appearance of a strongly luminous thin thread. By adjusting the potential at the terminal the light may be made to travel upwards at any speed. Once, however, the glass fibre is heated, the discharge breaks through its entire length instantly. The interesting point to be noted is that, the higher the frequency of the currents, or in other words, the greater relatively the lateral dissipation, at a slower rate may the light be made to propagate through the fibre. This experiment [Pg 358]is best performed with a highly exhausted and freshly made tube. When the tube has been used for some time the experiment often fails. It is possible that the gradual and slow impairment of the vacuum is the cause. This slow propagation of the discharge through a very narrow glass tube corresponds exactly to the propagation of heat through a bar warmed at one end. The quicker the heat is carried away laterally the longer time it will take for the heat to warm the remote end. When the current of a low frequency coil is passed through the fibre from end to end, then the lateral dissipation is small and the discharge instantly breaks through almost without exception.

A small tube about half an inch in diameter and twelve inches long (Fig. 189) has one end shaped into a fine fiber f nearly three feet long. The tube is placed in a brass socket T which can be screwed onto the terminal T1 of the induction coil. The discharge going through the tube first lights up the bottom, which has a relatively large section; however, the discharge can't pass through the long glass fiber. Gradually, the rarefied gas inside warms up and gets more conductive, and the discharge spreads into the glass fiber. This spreading is so slow that it can take half a minute or more for the discharge to travel all the way to the top of the glass fiber, creating the appearance of a brightly glowing thin thread. By adjusting the potential at the terminal, the light can be made to move upward at any speed. However, once the glass fiber is heated, the discharge rushes through its entire length instantly. The interesting point to note is that the higher the frequency of the currents, or in other words, the relatively greater the lateral dissipation, the slower the light can be made to propagate through the fiber. This experiment [Pg 358] is best conducted with a highly exhausted and freshly made tube. When the tube has been used for a while, the experiment often fails. It's possible that the gradual and slow deterioration of the vacuum is the reason. This slow propagation of the discharge through a very narrow glass tube corresponds exactly to how heat spreads through a bar that is warmed at one end. The quicker the heat is carried away laterally, the longer it takes to warm the far end. When a low-frequency coil passes current through the fiber from one end to the other, the lateral dissipation is minimal and the discharge breaks through almost instantly without exception.

Fig. 189, 190.
Fig. 189.Fig. 190.

After these experiments and observations which have shown the importance of the discontinuity or atomic structure of the medium and which will serve to explain, in a measure at least, the nature of the four kinds of light effects producible with these currents, I may now give you an illustration of these effects. For the sake of interest I may do this in a manner which to many of you might be novel. You have seen before that we may now convey the electric vibration to a body by means of a single wire or conductor of any kind. Since the [Pg 359]human frame is conducting I may convey the vibration through my body.

After these experiments and observations that have highlighted the significance of the discontinuity or atomic structure of the medium, which will help explain, at least to some extent, the nature of the four types of light effects produced with these currents, I can now provide you with an illustration of these effects. To keep it interesting, I'll present it in a way that might be new to many of you. As you've seen before, we can now transmit the electric vibration to an object using a single wire or some type of conductor. Since the [Pg 359] human body conducts electricity, I can transmit the vibration through my body.

First, as in some previous experiments, I connect my body with one of the terminals of a high-tension transformer and take in my hand an exhausted bulb which contains a small carbon button mounted upon a platinum wire leading to the outside of the bulb, and the button is rendered incandescent as soon as the transformer is set to work (Fig. 190). I may place a conducting shade on the bulb which serves to intensify the action, but is not necessary. Nor is it required that the button should be in conducting connection with the hand through a wire leading through the glass, for sufficient energy may be transmitted through the glass itself by inductive action to render the button incandescent.

First, similar to some previous experiments, I connect my body to one of the terminals of a high-voltage transformer and hold an exhausted bulb that has a small carbon button attached to a platinum wire leading outside the bulb. The button lights up as soon as the transformer is activated (Fig. 190). I can place a conductive shade over the bulb to enhance the effect, but it's not essential. It’s also not necessary for the button to be directly connected to my hand through a wire passing through the glass, as enough energy can be transmitted through the glass itself by inductive action to light up the button.

Fig. 191, 192.
Fig. 191.Fig. 192.

Next I take a highly exhausted bulb containing a strongly phosphorescent body, above which is mounted a small plate of aluminum on a platinum wire leading to the outside, and the currents flowing through my body excite intense phosphorescence in the bulb (Fig. 191). Next again I take in my hand a simple exhausted tube, and in the same manner the gas inside the tube is rendered highly incandescent or phosphorescent (Fig. 192). Finally, I may take in my hand a wire, bare or covered with thick insulation, it is quite immaterial; the electrical vibration is so intense as to cover the wire with a luminous film (Fig. 193).[Pg 360]

Next, I take a highly exhausted bulb that contains a strongly phosphorescent material, above which is a small aluminum plate attached to a platinum wire leading outside. The currents flowing through my body cause the bulb to glow intensely (Fig. 191). Then, I pick up a simple exhausted tube, and in the same way, the gas inside the tube becomes highly incandescent or phosphorescent (Fig. 192). Finally, I might hold a wire, either bare or covered with thick insulation; it doesn’t matter because the electrical vibrations are so strong that they create a luminous film around the wire (Fig. 193).[Pg 360]

Fig. 193, 194, 195.
Fig. 193.Fig. 194.Fig. 195.

A few words must now be devoted to each of these phenomena. In the first place, I will consider the incandescence of a button or of a solid in general, and dwell upon some facts which apply equally to all these phenomena. It was pointed out before that when a thin conductor, such as a lamp filament, for instance, is connected with one of its ends to the terminal of a transformer of high tension the filament is brought to incandescence partly by a conduction current and partly by bombardment. The shorter and thicker the filament the more important becomes the latter, and finally, reducing the filament to a mere button, all the heating must practically be attributed to the bombardment. So in the experiment before shown, the button is rendered incandescent by the rhythmical impact of freely movable small bodies in the bulb. These bodies may be the molecules of the residual gas, particles of dust or lumps torn from the electrode; whatever they are, it is certain that the heating of the button is essentially connected with the pressure of such freely movable particles, or of atomic matter in general in the bulb. The heating is the more intense the greater the number of impacts per second and the greater the energy of each impact. Yet the button would be heated also if it were connected to a source of a steady potential. In such a case electricity would be carried away from the button by the freely movable carriers or particles flying about, and the quantity of electricity thus carried away might be sufficient to bring the button to incandescence by its passage through the latter. But the bombardment could not be of great importance in such case. For this reason it would require a comparatively very great supply of energy to the button to maintain it at incandescence with a steady potential. The higher the frequency of the electric impulses the more economically can the button be maintained at incandescence. One of the chief reasons why this is so, is, I believe, that with impulses of very high frequency there is less exchange of the freely movable carriers around the electrode and this means, that in the bulb the heated matter is better confined to the neighborhood of the button. If a double bulb, as illustrated in Fig. 194 be made, comprising a large globe B and a small one b, each containing as usual a filament f mounted on a platinum wire w and w1, it is found, that if the filaments f f be exactly alike, it requires less energy to keep the filament in the globe b at a certain degree of incandescence, than that in the globe B. This is due to the confinement of the [Pg 361]movable particles around the button. In this case it is also ascertained, that the filament in the small globe b is less deteriorated when maintained a certain length of time at incandescence. This is a necessary consequence of the fact that the gas in the small bulb becomes strongly heated and therefore a very good conductor, and less work is then performed on the button, since the bombardment becomes less intense as the conductivity of the gas increases. In this construction, of course, the small bulb becomes very hot and when it reaches an elevated temperature the convection and radiation on the outside increase. On another occasion I have shown bulbs in which this drawback was largely avoided. In these instances a very small bulb, containing a refractory button, was mounted in a large globe and the space between the walls of both was highly exhausted. The outer large globe remained comparatively cool in such constructions. When the large globe was on the pump and the vacuum between the walls maintained permanent by the continuous action of the pump, the outer globe would remain quite cold, while the button in the small bulb was kept at incandescence. But when the seal was made, and the button in the small bulb maintained incandescent some length of time, the large globe too would become warmed. From this I conjecture that if vacuous space (as Prof. Dewar finds) cannot convey heat, it is so merely in virtue of our rapid motion through space or, generally speaking, by the motion of the medium relatively to us, for a permanent condition could [Pg 362]not be maintained without the medium being constantly renewed. A vacuum cannot, according to all evidence, be permanently maintained around a hot body.

A few words need to be said about each of these phenomena. First, I'll discuss the glowing of a button or a solid in general and highlight some facts that apply to all these phenomena. It was mentioned earlier that when a thin conductor, like a lamp filament, is connected at one end to a high-voltage transformer, the filament heats up due to both conduction current and bombardment. The shorter and thicker the filament, the more significant bombardment becomes, and eventually, when the filament is just a tiny button, all the heating is practically due to bombardment. In the previously shown experiment, the button glows because of the rhythmic impacts of freely movable small particles in the bulb. These could be molecules of the residual gas, dust particles, or bits torn from the electrode; whatever they are, it's clear that the heating of the button is closely linked to the pressure of these freely movable particles or atomic matter in general within the bulb. Heating intensifies with more impacts per second and higher energy for each impact. However, the button would also heat up if it were connected to a power source with steady potential. In that case, electricity would be drawn away from the button by the freely moving carriers or particles flying around, and the amount of electricity carried away might be enough to make the button glow through its passage. Yet, bombardment wouldn't play a significant role in this scenario. For this reason, maintaining incandescence with a steady potential would require a comparatively large supply of energy to the button. The higher the frequency of the electric impulses, the more efficiently the button can stay incandescent. One main reason for this, I believe, is that with very high-frequency impulses, there's less exchange of the freely moveable carriers around the electrode, meaning that the heated matter is more concentrated near the button in the bulb. If a double bulb is created, as shown in Fig. 194, with a large globe B and a small one b, each containing a filament f mounted on a platinum wire w and w1, it’s found that if the filaments f f are identical, it takes less energy to maintain the filament in the small globe b at a certain level of incandescence than it does for the filament in the larger globe B. This is due to the confinement of the movable particles around the button. It's also noted that the filament in the small globe b deteriorates less when kept at incandescence for a while. This is a direct result of the gas in the small bulb becoming very hot and thus a better conductor, meaning less work is done on the button, as bombardment becomes less intense with increased gas conductivity. In this setup, the small bulb gets quite hot, and as it reaches a high temperature, convection and radiation on the outside increase. In another instance, I've shown bulbs where this issue was largely avoided. In these cases, a very small bulb containing a heat-resistant button was mounted inside a large globe, and the space between their walls was highly evacuated. The outer large globe remained relatively cool in these setups. When the large globe was on the pump and the vacuum between the walls was maintained by the continuous action of the pump, the outer globe stayed cold while the button in the small bulb remained incandescent. However, once the seal was made and the button inside the small bulb stayed incandescent for some time, the large globe would also start to warm up. From this, I suspect that if vacuous space (as Prof. Dewar finds) can't transfer heat, it's only because of our rapid motion through space or, more generally, the medium's motion relative to us, since a consistent state could not be maintained without the medium being constantly refreshed. Evidence suggests that a vacuum cannot be kept around a hot body permanently.

In these constructions, before mentioned, the small bulb inside would, at least in the first stages, prevent all bombardment against the outer large globe. It occurred to me then to ascertain how a metal sieve would behave in this respect, and several bulbs, as illustrated in Fig. 195, were prepared for this purpose. In a globe b, was mounted a thin filament f (or button) upon a platinum wire w passing through a glass stem and leading to the outside of the globe. The filament f was surrounded by a metal sieve s. It was found in experiments with such bulbs that a sieve with wide meshes apparently did not in the slightest affect the bombardment against the globe b. When the vacuum was high, the shadow of the sieve was clearly projected against the globe and the latter would get hot in a short while. In some bulbs the sieve s was connected to a platinum wire sealed in the glass. When this wire was connected to the other terminal of the induction coil (the e. m. f. being kept low in this case), or to an insulated plate, the bombardment against the outer globe b was diminished. By taking a sieve with fine meshes the bombardment against the globe b was always diminished, but even then if the exhaustion was carried very far, and when the potential of the transformer was very high, the globe b would be bombarded and heated quickly, though no shadow of the sieve was visible, owing to the smallness of the meshes. But a glass tube or other continuous body mounted so as to surround the filament, did entirely cut off the bombardment and for a while the outer globe b would remain perfectly cold. Of course when the glass tube was sufficiently heated the bombardment against the outer globe could be noted at once. The experiments with these bulbs seemed to show that the speeds of the projected molecules or particles must be considerable (though quite insignificant when compared with that of light), otherwise it would be difficult to understand how they could traverse a fine metal sieve without being affected, unless it were found that such small particles or atoms cannot be acted upon directly at measurable distances. In regard to the speed of the projected atoms, Lord Kelvin has recently estimated it at about one kilometre a second or thereabouts in an ordinary Crookes bulb. As the potentials obtainable with a disruptive discharge coil are much higher than with or[Pg 363]dinary coils, the speeds must, of course, be much greater when the bulbs are lighted from such a coil. Assuming the speed to be as high as five kilometres and uniform through the whole trajectory, as it should be in a very highly exhausted vessel, then if the alternate electrifications of the electrode would be of a frequency of five million, the greatest distance a particle could get away from the electrode would be one millimetre, and if it could be acted upon directly at that distance, the exchange of electrode matter or of the atoms would be very slow and there would be practically no bombardment against the bulb. This at least should be so, if the action of an electrode upon the atoms of the residual gas would be such as upon electrified bodies which we can perceive. A hot body enclosed in an exhausted bulb produces always atomic bombardment, but a hot body has no definite rhythm, for its molecules perform vibrations of all kinds.

In the previously mentioned constructions, the small bulb inside would, at least in the initial stages, block all bombardment against the larger outer globe. I then thought to find out how a metal sieve would perform in this situation, so I prepared several bulbs for this purpose, as shown in Fig. 195. Inside a globe b, there was a thin filament f (or button) mounted on a platinum wire w that went through a glass stem to the outside of the globe. The filament f was surrounded by a metal sieve s. Experiments with these bulbs showed that a sieve with wide openings did not seem to affect the bombardment against the globe b at all. When the vacuum was high, the shadow of the sieve was clearly visible on the globe, and the globe would heat up quickly. In some bulbs, the sieve s was connected to a platinum wire sealed in the glass. When this wire was linked to another terminal of the induction coil (with the e.m.f. kept low), or to an insulated plate, the bombardment against the outer globe b decreased. Using a sieve with fine openings always reduced the bombardment against the globe b. However, even then, if the vacuum was extended significantly and the transformer’s potential was high, the globe b would still be bombarded and heat up quickly, even though the sieve’s shadow was not visible due to the small openings. But a glass tube or another continuous structure surrounding the filament completely stopped the bombardment, allowing the outer globe b to stay cold for a time. Of course, once the glass tube got hot enough, bombardment against the outer globe would become apparent instantly. The experiments with these bulbs suggested the velocities of the projected molecules or particles must be quite high (though negligible compared to light speed); otherwise, it would be hard to understand how they could pass through a fine metal sieve without being affected, unless small particles or atoms can’t be acted upon directly at measurable distances. Regarding the speed of projected atoms, Lord Kelvin recently estimated it to be around one kilometer per second in a typical Crookes bulb. Since the potentials obtainable with a disruptive discharge coil are much higher than those with ordinary coils, the speeds must also be significantly greater when bulbs are lit with such a coil. Assuming that the speed was as high as five kilometers and consistent throughout the entire path, as it should be in a highly exhausted vessel, then if the alternating electric charge of the electrode had a frequency of five million, the farthest a particle could move from the electrode would be one millimeter. If it could be acted upon directly at that distance, the exchange of electrode material or atoms would be very slow, resulting in virtually no bombardment against the bulb. This should hold true if the electrode acts on the atoms of residual gas similarly to how we perceive electrified bodies. A hot body enclosed in an evacuated bulb always causes atomic bombardment, but a hot body lacks a specific rhythm, as its molecules vibrate in all sorts of ways.

If a bulb containing a button or filament be exhausted as high as is possible with the greatest care and by the use of the best artifices, it is often observed that the discharge cannot, at first, break through, but after some time, probably in consequence of some changes within the bulb, the discharge finally passes through and the button is rendered incandescent. In fact, it appears that the higher the degree of exhaustion the easier is the incandescence produced. There seem to be no other causes to which the incandescence might be attributed in such case except to the bombardment or similar action of the residual gas, or of particles of matter in general. But if the bulb be exhausted with the greatest care can these play an important part? Assume the vacuum in the bulb to be tolerably perfect, the great interest then centres in the question: Is the medium which pervades all space continuous or atomic? If atomic, then the heating of a conducting button or filament in an exhausted vessel might be due largely to ether bombardment, and then the heating of a conductor in general through which currents of high frequency or high potential are passed must be modified by the behavior of such medium; then also the skin effect, the apparent increase of the ohmic resistance, etc., admit, partially at least, of a different explanation.

If a bulb with a button or filament is exhausted as much as possible with great care and using the best methods, it’s often noticed that the discharge can’t initially break through. However, after some time—likely due to changes within the bulb—the discharge eventually occurs, and the button glows. In fact, it seems that the more exhausted the bulb is, the easier it is for incandescence to happen. There don’t appear to be any other reasons for the incandescence in such cases, except for the impact of residual gas particles or matter in general. But if the bulb is perfectly exhausted, can these really play a significant role? Assuming the vacuum in the bulb is nearly perfect, the main interest then focuses on the question: Is the medium that fills all space continuous or atomic? If it’s atomic, then the heating of a conductive button or filament in a vacuum might be largely due to ether bombardment. Consequently, the heating of any conductor carrying high-frequency or high-potential currents must be influenced by how this medium behaves. This also means that the skin effect, the apparent increase in ohmic resistance, etc., can partially be explained differently.

It is certainly more in accordance with many phenomena observed with high-frequency currents to hold that all space is pervaded with free atoms, rather than to assume that it is devoid of these, and dark and cold, for so it must be, if filled with a continuous medium, since in such there can be neither heat nor light.[Pg 364] Is then energy transmitted by independent carriers or by the vibration of a continuous medium? This important question is by no means as yet positively answered. But most of the effects which are here considered, especially the light effects, incandescence, or phosphorescence, involve the presence of free atoms and would be impossible without these.

It makes more sense, based on many observed phenomena with high-frequency currents, to believe that all space is filled with free atoms rather than thinking it is empty, dark, and cold. If it were filled with a continuous medium, it would have neither heat nor light.[Pg 364] So, is energy transmitted by independent carriers or through the vibration of a continuous medium? This crucial question is still not definitively answered. However, most of the effects discussed here, particularly the light effects, incandescence, or phosphorescence, involve the presence of free atoms and would be impossible without them.

In regard to the incandescence of a refractory button (or filament) in an exhausted receiver, which has been one of the subjects of this investigation, the chief experiences, which may serve as a guide in constructing such bulbs, may be summed up as follows: 1. The button should be as small as possible, spherical, of a smooth or polished surface, and of refractory material which withstands evaporation best. 2. The support of the button should be very thin and screened by an aluminum and mica sheet, as I have described on another occasion. 3. The exhaustion of the bulb should be as high as possible. 4. The frequency of the currents should be as high as practicable. 5. The currents should be of a harmonic rise and fall, without sudden interruptions. 6. The heat should be confined to the button by inclosing the same in a small bulb or otherwise. 7. The space between the walls of the small bulb and the outer globe should be highly exhausted.

Regarding the glow of a refractory button (or filament) in a vacuum chamber, which has been a key focus of this study, the main findings that can help guide the construction of such bulbs can be summarized as follows: 1. The button should be as small as possible, spherical, with a smooth or polished surface, and made of a refractory material that best resists evaporation. 2. The button's support should be very thin and shielded by a sheet of aluminum and mica, as I have described elsewhere. 3. The vacuum inside the bulb should be as strong as possible. 4. The frequency of the currents should be as high as feasible. 5. The currents should have a smooth, harmonic rise and fall, with no sudden interruptions. 6. The heat should be concentrated on the button by enclosing it in a small bulb or similar structure. 7. The space between the walls of the small bulb and the outer globe should also be highly evacuated.

Most of the considerations which apply to the incandescence of a solid just considered may likewise be applied to phosphorescence. Indeed, in an exhausted vessel the phosphorescence is, as a rule, primarily excited by the powerful beating of the electrode stream of atoms against the phosphorescent body. Even in many cases, where there is no evidence of such a bombardment, I think that phosphorescence is excited by violent impacts of atoms, which are not necessarily thrown off from the electrode but are acted upon from the same inductively through the medium or through chains of other atoms. That mechanical shocks play an important part in exciting phosphorescence in a bulb may be seen from the following experiment. If a bulb, constructed as that illustrated in Fig. 174, be taken and exhausted with the greatest care so that the discharge cannot pass, the filament f acts by electrostatic induction upon the tube t and the latter is set in vibration. If the tube o be rather wide, about an inch or so, the filament may be so powerfully vibrated that whenever it hits the glass tube it excites phosphorescence. But the phosphorescence ceases when the filament comes to rest. The vibration can be arrested and again started by varying the[Pg 365] frequency of the currents. Now the filament has its own period of vibration, and if the frequency of the currents is such that there is resonance, it is easily set vibrating, though the potential of the currents be small. I have often observed that the filament in the bulb is destroyed by such mechanical resonance. The filament vibrates as a rule so rapidly that it cannot be seen and the experimenter may at first be mystified. When such an experiment as the one described is carefully performed, the potential of the currents need be extremely small, and for this reason I infer that the phosphorescence is then due to the mechanical shock of the filament against the glass, just as it is produced by striking a loaf of sugar with a knife. The mechanical shock produced by the projected atoms is easily noted when a bulb containing a button is grasped in the hand and the current turned on suddenly. I believe that a bulb could be shattered by observing the conditions of resonance.

Most of the considerations that apply to the brightness of a solid discussed earlier also apply to phosphorescence. In a vacuum chamber, phosphorescence is usually stimulated by the intense flow of atomic particles colliding with the phosphorescent material. Even in many situations where there's no visible evidence of such bombardment, I believe that phosphorescence is triggered by strong collisions of atoms, which aren't necessarily emitted from the electrode but are influenced by it through the surrounding medium or through connections with other atoms. The significant role of mechanical impacts in generating phosphorescence in a bulb can be illustrated with the following experiment. If you take a bulb, like the one shown in Fig. 174, and carefully create a vacuum so that the discharge can't occur, the filament f induces electrostatic activity in the tube t, causing it to vibrate. If the tube o is relatively wide, about an inch or so, the filament can vibrate with enough force to produce phosphorescence each time it hits the glass tube. However, the phosphorescence stops when the filament becomes stationary. You can stop and start the vibration by changing the[Pg 365] frequency of the currents. The filament has its own natural vibration period, and if the frequency of the currents matches this period, it easily starts to vibrate, even if the current's voltage is low. I've often noticed that the filament in the bulb gets destroyed due to this mechanical resonance. The filament typically vibrates so quickly that it's imperceptible, leaving the experimenter initially puzzled. When an experiment like the one described is conducted carefully, the voltage of the currents can be very low, which leads me to conclude that the phosphorescence is caused by the mechanical shock of the filament hitting the glass, similar to how striking a loaf of sugar with a knife produces it. The mechanical shock from the colliding atoms is easy to observe when you hold a bulb containing a button in your hand and suddenly turn on the current. I believe a bulb could be shattered by manipulating the conditions of resonance.

In the experiment before cited it is, of course, open to say, that the glass tube, upon coming in contact with the filament, retains a charge of a certain sign upon the point of contact. If now the filament again touches the glass at the same point while it is oppositely charged, the charges equalize under evolution of light. But nothing of importance would be gained by such an explanation. It is unquestionable that the initial charges given to the atoms or to the glass play some part in exciting phosphorescence. So, for instance, if a phosphorescent bulb be first excited by a high frequency coil by connecting it to one of the terminals of the latter and the degree of luminosity be noted, and then the bulb be highly charged from a Holtz machine by attaching it preferably to the positive terminal of the machine, it is found that when the bulb is again connected to the terminal of the high frequency coil, the phosphorescence is far more intense. On another occasion I have considered the possibility of some phosphorescent phenomena in bulbs being produced by the incandescence of an infinitesimal layer on the surface of the phosphorescent body. Certainly the impact of the atoms is powerful enough to produce intense incandescence by the collisions, since they bring quickly to a high temperature a body of considerable bulk. If any such effect exists, then the best appliance for producing phosphorescence in a bulb, which we know so far, is a disruptive discharge coil giving an enormous potential with but few fundamental discharges, say 25-30 per second, just enough to produce a continu[Pg 366]ous impression upon the eye. It is a fact that such a coil excites phosphorescence under almost any condition and at all degrees of exhaustion, and I have observed effects which appear to be due to phosphorescence even at ordinary pressures of the atmosphere, when the potentials are extremely high. But if phosphorescent light is produced by the equalization of charges of electrified atoms (whatever this may mean ultimately), then the higher the frequency of the impulses or alternate electrifications, the more economical will be the light production. It is a long known and noteworthy fact that all the phosphorescent bodies are poor conductors of electricity and heat, and that all bodies cease to emit phosphorescent light when they are brought to a certain temperature. Conductors on the contrary do not possess this quality. There are but few exceptions to the rule. Carbon is one of them. Becquerel noted that carbon phosphoresces at a certain elevated temperature preceding the dark red. This phenomenon may be easily observed in bulbs provided with a rather large carbon electrode (say, a sphere of six millimetres diameter). If the current is turned on after a few seconds, a snow white film covers the electrode, just before it gets dark red. Similar effects are noted with other conducting bodies, but many scientific men will probably not attribute them to true phosphorescence. Whether true incandescence has anything to do with phosphorescence excited by atomic impact or mechanical shocks still remains to be decided, but it is a fact that all conditions, which tend to localize and increase the heating effect at the point of impact, are almost invariably the most favorable for the production of phosphorescence. So, if the electrode be very small, which is equivalent to saying in general, that the electric density is great; if the potential be high, and if the gas be highly rarefied, all of which things imply high speed of the projected atoms, or matter, and consequently violent impacts—the phosphorescence is very intense. If a bulb provided with a large and small electrode be attached to the terminal of an induction coil, the small electrode excites phosphorescence while the large one may not do so, because of the smaller electric density and hence smaller speed of the atoms. A bulb provided with a large electrode may be grasped with the hand while the electrode is connected to the terminal of the coil and it may not phosphoresce; but if instead of grasping the bulb with the hand, the same be touched with a pointed wire, the phosphorescence at once spreads[Pg 367] through the bulb, because of the great density at the point of contact. With low frequencies it seems that gases of great atomic weight excite more intense phosphorescence than those of smaller weight, as for instance, hydrogen. With high frequencies the observations are not sufficiently reliable to draw a conclusion. Oxygen, as is well-known, produces exceptionally strong effects, which may be in part due to chemical action. A bulb with hydrogen residue seems to be most easily excited. Electrodes which are most easily deteriorated produce more intense phosphorescence in bulbs, but the condition is not permanent because of the impairment of the vacuum and the deposition of the electrode matter upon the phosphorescent surfaces. Some liquids, as oils, for instance, produce magnificent effects of phosphorescence (or fluorescence?), but they last only a few seconds. So if a bulb has a trace of oil on the walls and the current is turned on, the phosphorescence only persists for a few moments until the oil is carried away. Of all bodies so far tried, sulphide of zinc seems to be the most susceptible to phosphorescence. Some samples, obtained through the kindness of Prof. Henry in Paris, were employed in many of these bulbs. One of the defects of this sulphide is, that it loses its quality of emitting light when brought to a temperature which is by no means high. It can therefore, be used only for feeble intensities. An observation which might deserve notice is, that when violently bombarded from an aluminum electrode it assumes a black color, but singularly enough, it returns to the original condition when it cools down.

In the previously mentioned experiment, it can be said that the glass tube, when it makes contact with the filament, holds a charge of a certain polarity at the contact point. If the filament touches the glass again at the same point while it has an opposite charge, the charges balance out, creating light. However, this explanation doesn’t add much significance. It's clear that the initial charges applied to the atoms or to the glass contribute to generating phosphorescence. For example, if a phosphorescent bulb is first energized by a high-frequency coil connected to one of its terminals, and the level of brightness is recorded, then if the bulb is charged using a Holtz machine by connecting it to the positive terminal, it’s observed that when the bulb reconnects to the high-frequency coil, the phosphorescence is much brighter. Previously, I considered whether some phosphorescent effects in bulbs result from the incandescence of a tiny layer on the surface of the phosphorescent material. The collision of atoms is definitely strong enough to produce intense incandescence through these impacts, quickly raising a larger object's temperature. If such an effect exists, then the best device for inducing phosphorescence in a bulb that we know of is a disruptive discharge coil, which provides a very high potential with only a few fundamental discharges, around 25-30 per second, just enough to create a continuous impression on the eye. It is a fact that such a coil stimulates phosphorescence under nearly all conditions and at all levels of vacuum, and I have seen effects that seem to stem from phosphorescence even at standard atmospheric pressures, given extremely high potentials. However, if phosphorescent light is produced by balancing the charges of electrified atoms (whatever that might ultimately entail), then the higher the frequency of the impulses or alternating electrifications, the more efficient the light production will be. It has long been noted that all phosphorescent materials are poor conductors of electricity and heat, and that all substances stop emitting phosphorescent light when they reach a certain temperature. In contrast, conductors do not have this characteristic, with few exceptions. Carbon is one of those exceptions. Becquerel noted that carbon phosphoresces at a specific elevated temperature just before it turns dark red. This effect can be easily observed in bulbs with a relatively large carbon electrode, like a sphere with a diameter of six millimeters. When the current is turned on after a few seconds, a bright white film appears on the electrode just before it turns dark red. Similar effects are seen with other conductive materials, but many scientists may not consider them to be genuine phosphorescence. Whether true incandescence relates to phosphorescence caused by atomic impact or mechanical shocks is still undecided, but it is a fact that all conditions which tend to concentrate and enhance the heating effect at the point of impact are almost always the most conducive for generating phosphorescence. Therefore, if the electrode is very small—which generally means a high electric density; if the potential is high, and if the gas is extremely rarefied—all these factors imply a high speed of the projected atoms or matter, leading to violent impacts, which result in very intense phosphorescence. If a bulb with both a large and a small electrode is attached to an induction coil, the small electrode may cause phosphorescence while the large one might not, due to the smaller electric density and therefore slower atom speed. A bulb with a large electrode can be held in hand while connected to the coil and may not show phosphorescence; however, if it’s touched with a pointed wire instead, the phosphorescence immediately spreads through the bulb due to the high density at the contact point. With low frequencies, gases with a greater atomic weight tend to produce more intense phosphorescence than those with lower atomic weights, such as hydrogen. With high frequencies, the observations aren’t reliable enough to draw conclusions. Oxygen, as is well-known, creates exceptionally strong effects, possibly due in part to chemical reactions. A bulb that retains hydrogen seems to be the easiest to excite. Electrodes that deteriorate quickly result in more intense phosphorescence in bulbs, although this isn’t a permanent condition due to vacuum degradation and the deposition of electrode material on the phosphorescent surfaces. Some liquids, like oils, create remarkable phosphorescent (or fluorescent?) effects, but they only last for a few seconds. If a bulb has even a trace of oil on its walls and the current is activated, the phosphorescence will only last for a moment before the oil is washed away. Of all the materials tested, zinc sulfide seems to be the most responsive to phosphorescence. Some samples kindly provided by Prof. Henry in Paris were used in many of these bulbs. One limitation of this sulfide is that it loses its ability to emit light at relatively low temperatures. Therefore, it can only be used for weak intensities. An interesting observation is that when it is intensely bombarded from an aluminum electrode, it turns black, but remarkably, it returns to its original state upon cooling down.

The most important fact arrived at in pursuing investigations in this direction is, that in all cases it is necessary, in order to excite phosphorescence with a minimum amount of energy, to observe certain conditions. Namely, there is always, no matter what the frequency of the currents, degree of exhaustion and character of the bodies in the bulb, a certain potential (assuming the bulb excited from one terminal) or potential difference (assuming the bulb to be excited with both terminals) which produces the most economical result. If the potential be increased, considerable energy may be wasted without producing any more light, and if it be diminished, then again the light production is not as economical. The exact condition under which the best result is obtained seems to depend on many things of a different nature, and it is to be yet investigated by other experimenters, but it will certainly[Pg 368] have to be observed when such phosphorescent bulbs are operated, if the best results are to be obtained.

The most important finding from these investigations is that, to produce phosphorescence with the least amount of energy, certain conditions must be met. No matter the frequency of the currents, the level of vacuum, or the type of materials in the bulb, there is always a specific potential (if the bulb is powered from one terminal) or potential difference (if both terminals are used) that yields the most efficient outcome. Increasing the potential can waste a significant amount of energy without generating more light, and decreasing it also results in less efficient light production. The exact conditions for achieving the best results seem to depend on various factors, and further investigation by other researchers is needed. However, it will definitely have to be taken into account when operating such phosphorescent bulbs to achieve the best outcomes.

Coming now to the most interesting of these phenomena, the incandescence or phosphorescence of gases, at low pressures or at the ordinary pressure of the atmosphere, we must seek the explanation of these phenomena in the same primary causes, that is, in shocks or impacts of the atoms. Just as molecules or atoms beating upon a solid body excite phosphorescence in the same or render it incandescent, so when colliding among themselves they produce similar phenomena. But this is a very insufficient explanation and concerns only the crude mechanism. Light is produced by vibrations which go on at a rate almost inconceivable. If we compute, from the energy contained in the form of known radiations in a definite space the force which is necessary to set up such rapid vibrations, we find, that though the density of the ether be incomparably smaller than that of any body we know, even hydrogen, the force is something surpassing comprehension. What is this force, which in mechanical measure may amount to thousands of tons per square inch? It is electrostatic force in the light of modern views. It is impossible to conceive how a body of measurable dimensions could be charged to so high a potential that the force would be sufficient to produce these vibrations. Long before any such charge could be imparted to the body it would be shattered into atoms. The sun emits light and heat, and so does an ordinary flame or incandescent filament, but in neither of these can the force be accounted for if it be assumed that it is associated with the body as a whole. Only in one way may we account for it, namely, by identifying it with the atom. An atom is so small, that if it be charged by coming in contact with an electrified body and the charge be assumed to follow the same law as in the case of bodies of measurable dimensions, it must retain a quantity of electricity which is fully capable of accounting for these forces and tremendous rates of vibration. But the atom behaves singularly in this respect—it always takes the same "charge."

Now, let's talk about the most intriguing of these phenomena: the glow or shine of gases at low or normal atmospheric pressure. We need to explain these phenomena through the same basic causes, which are the collisions or impacts of atoms. Just like molecules or atoms hitting a solid object can cause it to glow or shine, when they collide with one another, they also create similar effects. However, this explanation is very basic and only addresses the mechanical aspect. Light is created by vibrations happening at an almost unimaginable rate. When we calculate, based on the energy contained in known forms of radiation in a specific space, the force needed to produce such rapid vibrations, we discover that even though the density of the ether is vastly smaller than that of any known substance, including hydrogen, the force involved is beyond comprehension. What is this force that, when measured mechanically, could be in the thousands of tons per square inch? It is electrostatic force, according to modern perspectives. It's hard to imagine how a body of tangible size could be charged to such a high potential that the force would be enough to generate these vibrations. Long before such a charge could be applied to the body, it would disintegrate into atoms. The sun emits light and heat, as does a standard flame or glowing filament, but you can't explain the force involved if you think it comes from the body as a whole. The only way to understand it is by linking it to the atom. An atom is so tiny that if it gets charged from touching an electrified object and we assume this charge follows the same rules as larger bodies, it must hold a quantity of electricity that is entirely sufficient to account for these forces and incredible vibration rates. Yet, the atom acts strangely in this regard—it always takes the same "charge."

It is very likely that resonant vibration plays a most important part in all manifestations of energy in nature. Throughout space all matter is vibrating, and all rates of vibration are represented, from the lowest musical note to the highest pitch of the chemical rays, hence an atom, or complex of atoms, no matter what its period, must find a vibration with which it is in resonance.[Pg 369] When we consider the enormous rapidity of the light vibrations, we realize the impossibility of producing such vibrations directly with any apparatus of measurable dimensions, and we are driven to the only possible means of attaining the object of setting up waves of light by electrical means and economically, that is, to affect the molecules or atoms of a gas, to cause them to collide and vibrate. We then must ask ourselves—How can free molecules or atoms be affected?

It's highly likely that resonant vibration plays a crucial role in all forms of energy in nature. All matter in space is vibrating, with all rates of vibration represented, from the lowest musical note to the highest pitch of chemical rays. Therefore, an atom or a group of atoms, regardless of its frequency, must find a vibration that resonates with it.[Pg 369] Considering the incredible speed of light vibrations, we understand the impossibility of producing such vibrations directly with any measuring device. This leads us to the only viable method to create light waves using electrical means efficiently: by affecting the molecules or atoms of a gas to make them collide and vibrate. We must then ask ourselves—How can we influence free molecules or atoms?

Fig. 196, 197.
Fig. 196.Fig. 197.

It is a fact that they can be affected by electrostatic force, as is apparent in many of these experiments. By varying the electrostatic force we can agitate the atoms, and cause them to collide accompanied by evolution of heat and light. It is not demonstrated beyond doubt that we can affect them otherwise. If a luminous discharge is produced in a closed exhausted tube, do the atoms arrange themselves in obedience to any other but to electrostatic force acting in straight lines from atom to atom? Only recently I investigated the mutual action between two circuits with extreme rates of vibration. When a battery of a few jars (c c c c, Fig. 196) is discharged through a primary P of low resistance (the connections being as illustrated in Figs. 183a, 183b and 183c), and the frequency of vibration is many millions there are great differences of potential between points on the primary not more than a few inches apart. These differences may be 10,000 volts per inch, if not more, taking the maximum value of the e. m. f. The secondary s is therefore acted upon by electrostatic induction, which is in such extreme cases of much greater importance than the electro-dynamic. To such sudden impulses the primary as well as the secondary are poor conductors, and therefore great differences of potential may be produced by electrostatic induction between adjacent points on the secondary. Then sparks may jump between the wires and streamers become visible in the dark if the light of the discharge through the spark gap d d be carefully excluded. If now we substitute a closed vacuum tube for the metallic secondary s, the differences of potential produced in the tube by electrostatic induction from the primary are fully sufficient to excite portions of it; but as the points of certain differences of potential on the primary are not fixed, but are generally constantly changing in position, a luminous band is produced in the tube, apparently not touching the glass, as it should, if the points of maximum and minimum differences of potential were fixed on the primary. I do not exclude the possibility of such a [Pg 370]tube being excited only by electro-dynamic induction, for very able physicists hold this view; but in my opinion, there is as yet no positive proof given that atoms of a gas in a closed tube may arrange themselves in chains under the action of an electromotive impulse produced by electro-dynamic induction in the tube. I have been unable so far to produce striæ in a tube, however long, and at whatever degree of exhaustion, that is, striæ at right angles to the supposed direction of the discharge or the axis of the tube; but I have distinctly observed in a large bulb, in which a wide luminous band was produced by passing a discharge of a battery through a wire surrounding the bulb, a circle of feeble luminosity between two luminous bands, one of which was more intense than the other. Furthermore, with my present experience I do not think that such a gas discharge in a closed tube can vibrate, that is, vibrate as a whole. I am convinced that no discharge through a gas can vibrate. The atoms of a gas behave very curiously in respect to sudden electric impulses. The gas does not seem to possess any appreciable inertia to such impulses, for it is a fact, that the higher the frequency of the impulses, with the greater freedom does the discharge pass through the gas. If the gas possesses no inertia then it cannot vibrate, for some inertia is necessary for the free vibration. I conclude from this that if a lightning discharge occurs between two clouds, there can be no oscillation, such as would be expected, considering the capacity of the clouds. But if the lightning discharge strike the earth, there is always vibration—in the earth, but not in the cloud. In a gas discharge each atom vibrates at its own rate, but there is no vibration of the conducting gaseous mass as a whole. This is an important consideration in the great problem of producing light economi[Pg 371]cally, for it teaches us that to reach this result we must use impulses of very high frequency and necessarily also of high potential. It is a fact that oxygen produces a more intense light in a tube. Is it because oxygen atoms possess some inertia and the vibration does not die out instantly? But then nitrogen should be as good, and chlorine and vapors of many other bodies much better than oxygen, unless the magnetic properties of the latter enter prominently into play. Or, is the process in the tube of an electrolytic nature? Many observations certainly speak for it, the most important being that matter is always carried away from the electrodes and the vacuum in a bulb cannot be permanently maintained. If such process takes place in reality, then again must we take refuge in high frequencies, for, with such, electrolytic action should be reduced to a minimum, if not rendered entirely impossible. It is an undeniable fact that with very high frequencies, provided the impulses be of harmonic nature, like those obtained from an alternator, there is less deterioration and the vacua are more permanent. With disruptive discharge coils there are sudden rises of potential and the vacua are more quickly impaired, for the electrodes are deteriorated in a very short time. It was observed in some large tubes, which were provided with heavy carbon blocks B B1, connected to platinum wires w w1 (as illustrated in Fig. 197), and which were employed in experiments with the disruptive discharge instead of the ordinary air gap, that the carbon particles under the action of the powerful magnetic field in which the tube was placed, were deposited in regular fine lines in the middle of the tube, as illustrated. These lines were attributed to the deflection or distortion of the discharge by the magnetic field, but why the deposit occurred principally where the field was most intense did not appear quite clear. A fact of interest, likewise noted, was that the presence of a strong magnetic field increases the deterioration of the electrodes, probably by reason of the rapid interruptions it produces, whereby there is actually a higher e. m. f. maintained between the electrodes.

It’s a fact that they can be influenced by electrostatic force, as seen in many experiments. By changing the electrostatic force, we can agitate the atoms and make them collide, producing heat and light. It hasn’t been definitively proven that we can affect them in other ways. If a bright discharge occurs in a closed vacuum tube, do the atoms align themselves in response to anything other than the electrostatic force acting in straight lines from atom to atom? Recently, I looked into the interaction between two circuits with very high vibration rates. When a battery of a few jars (c c c c, Fig. 196) is discharged through a primary P of low resistance (connections illustrated in Figs. 183a, 183b, and 183c), and the vibration frequency is in the millions, there are significant potential differences between points on the primary that are only a few inches apart. These differences can reach 10,000 volts per inch or more, taking the maximum value of the e.m.f. Therefore, the secondary s is influenced by electrostatic induction, which is far more significant than electro-dynamic induction in such extreme cases. For those rapid impulses, both the primary and secondary are poor conductors, so substantial potential differences can arise through electrostatic induction between neighboring points on the secondary. Sparks can jump between the wires, and streams become visible in the dark if the light from the discharge through the spark gap d d is carefully blocked. If we replace the metallic secondary s with a closed vacuum tube, the potential differences created in the tube by electrostatic induction from the primary are enough to excite sections of it; however, since the points of certain potential differences on the primary are not fixed and constantly change position, a luminous band appears in the tube, seemingly not touching the glass as it would if the points of maximum and minimum potential differences were fixed on the primary. I don’t rule out the possibility that such a [Pg 370] tube could be excited solely by electro-dynamic induction, as very capable physicists believe, but in my view, there is no conclusive evidence yet that gas atoms in a closed tube can arrange themselves in chains under the influence of an electromotive impulse produced by electro-dynamic induction within the tube. So far, I haven’t been able to produce striations in a tube, regardless of its length or level of exhaustion, that is, striations at right angles to the expected discharge direction or the tube’s axis; however, I have clearly observed in a large bulb, which produced a wide luminous band by passing a discharge from a battery through a wire encasing the bulb, a circle of faint luminosity between two luminous bands, one of which was more intense than the other. Furthermore, based on my current experience, I don’t believe that a gas discharge in a closed tube can vibrate, meaning it cannot vibrate as a whole. I am convinced that no discharge through a gas can vibrate. Gas atoms react very interestingly to sudden electric impulses. The gas doesn't seem to possess any significant inertia to these impulses, because the higher the frequency of the impulses, the more freely the discharge passes through the gas. If the gas has no inertia, then it can't vibrate, since some inertia is necessary for free vibration. I conclude that if a lightning discharge occurs between two clouds, there can’t be oscillation, as one might expect, given the clouds’ capacity. But if the lightning strike hits the earth, there’s always vibration—in the earth, but not in the cloud. In a gas discharge, each atom vibrates at its own rate, but there’s no vibration of the entire gaseous body. This is an important consideration in the larger challenge of producing light efficiently, as it indicates we need to use very high frequency impulses and necessarily high potential as well. It’s a fact that oxygen produces a more intense light in a tube. Is it because oxygen atoms have some inertia, causing the vibration not to decay immediately? But then nitrogen should work just as well, and chlorine and vapors of many other substances should be much better than oxygen, unless the magnetic properties of oxygen play a significant role. Or is the process in the tube electrolytic? Many observations certainly support this idea, with the most significant being that matter is always removed from the electrodes, and a vacuum in a bulb can't be maintained permanently. If such a process truly occurs, we must again rely on high frequencies, as with high frequencies, electrolytic action should be minimized, if not entirely prevented. It’s undeniable that with extremely high frequencies, provided the impulses are harmonic, like those obtained from an alternator, there’s less deterioration, and the vacuums are more stable. With disruptive discharge coils, there are rapid potential spikes, and vacuums are degraded faster because the electrodes deteriorate quickly. It was noted in some large tubes, equipped with heavy carbon blocks B B1, connected to platinum wires w w1 (as shown in Fig. 197), and used in disruptive discharge experiments instead of the usual air gap, that the carbon particles, under the influence of the strong magnetic field around the tube, were deposited in fine, regular lines in the middle of the tube, as illustrated. These lines were thought to be caused by the discharge's deflection or distortion by the magnetic field, but it wasn’t entirely clear why the deposit occurred mainly where the field was strongest. Another interesting fact noted was that a strong magnetic field increases electrode deterioration, likely due to the rapid interruptions it causes, resulting in a higher e. m. f. maintained between the electrodes.

Much would remain to be said about the luminous effects produced in gases at low or ordinary pressures. With the present experiences before us we cannot say that the essential nature of these charming phenomena is sufficiently known. But investigations in this direction are being pushed with exceptional ardor. Every line of scientific pursuit has its fascinations, but electrical[Pg 372] investigation appears to possess a peculiar attraction, for there is no experiment or observation of any kind in the domain of this wonderful science which would not forcibly appeal to us. Yet to me it seems, that of all the many marvelous things we observe, a vacuum tube, excited by an electric impulse from a distant source, bursting forth out of the darkness and illuminating the room with its beautiful light, is as lovely a phenomenon as can greet our eyes. More interesting still it appears when, reducing the fundamental discharges across the gap to a very small number and waving the tube about we produce all kinds of designs in luminous lines. So by way of amusement I take a straight long tube, or a square one, or a square attached to a straight tube, and by whirling them about in the hand, I imitate the spokes of a wheel, a Gramme winding, a drum winding, an alternate current motor winding, etc. (Fig. 198). Viewed from a distance the effect is weak and much of its beauty is lost, but being near or holding the tube in the hand, one cannot resist its charm.

There’s still a lot to explore about the glowing effects created in gases at low or normal pressures. From what we know now, we can’t say we fully understand the essential nature of these fascinating phenomena. However, research in this area is advancing with great enthusiasm. Every scientific field has its allure, but electrical investigation seems to have a unique appeal since every experiment or observation within this amazing science is intriguing. To me, one of the most stunning things we can observe is a vacuum tube, energized by an electric impulse from a remote source, lighting up the darkness and brightening the room with its beautiful glow. It becomes even more fascinating when we minimize the main discharges across the gap to a very low level and move the tube around, creating all sorts of luminous designs. For fun, I take a long straight tube or a square one, or a square joined to a straight tube, and by spinning them in my hand, I mimic the spokes of a wheel, a Gramme winding, a drum winding, an alternating current motor winding, etc. (Fig. 198). When viewed from a distance, the effect is faint, and much of its beauty is diminished, but being up close or holding the tube in my hand makes it impossible to resist its charm.

Fig. 198. Fig. 198.

In presenting these insignificant results I have not attempted to arrange and co-ordinate them, as would be proper in a strictly scientific investigation, in which every succeeding result should be a logical sequence of the preceding, so that it might be guessed in advance by the careful reader or attentive listener. I have preferred to concentrate my energies chiefly upon advancing novel facts or ideas which might serve as suggestions to others, and this may serve as an excuse for the lack of harmony. The explanations of the phenomena have been given in good faith and in the spirit of a student prepared to find that they admit of a better interpretation. There can be no great harm in a student taking an erroneous view, but when great minds err, the world must dearly pay for their mistakes.

In sharing these insignificant results, I haven't tried to organize and connect them as would be expected in a formal scientific study, where each result logically follows from the previous one, allowing the careful reader or attentive listener to anticipate what comes next. Instead, I've focused mainly on presenting new facts or ideas that could inspire others, which might explain the lack of coherence. The explanations for the phenomena have been provided in good faith and with the mindset of a student ready to accept that they can be interpreted better. A student holding a mistaken view may not cause much trouble, but when great minds err, the world pays dearly for their mistakes.


CHAPTER XXIX.

Tesla Alternating Current Generators for High Frequency, Explained in Detail.

It has become a common practice to operate arc lamps by alternating or pulsating, as distinguished from continuous, currents; but an objection which has been raised to such systems exists in the fact that the arcs emit a pronounced sound, varying with the rate of the alternations or pulsations of current. This noise is due to the rapidly alternating heating and cooling, and consequent expansion and contraction, of the gaseous matter forming the arc, which corresponds with the periods or impulses of the current. Another disadvantageous feature is found in the difficulty of maintaining an alternating current arc in consequence of the periodical increase in resistance corresponding to the periodical working of the current. This feature entails a further disadvantage, namely, that small arcs are impracticable.

It has become common to run arc lamps using alternating or pulsating currents instead of continuous ones. However, one issue with these systems is that the arcs produce a noticeable sound that changes with the frequency of the current's alternations or pulsations. This noise comes from the rapid heating and cooling, as well as the expansion and contraction, of the gas in the arc, which aligns with the current's cycles. Another drawback is the challenge of maintaining an alternating current arc due to the periodic increase in resistance that corresponds with the current's fluctuation. This leads to an additional problem: it's difficult to create small arcs.

Theoretical considerations have led Mr. Tesla to the belief that these disadvantageous features could be obviated by employing currents of a sufficiently high number of alternations, and his anticipations have been confirmed in practice. These rapidly alternating currents render it possible to maintain small arcs which, besides, possess the advantages of silence and persistency. The latter quality is due to the necessarily rapid alternations, in consequence of which the arc has no time to cool, and is always maintained at a high temperature and low resistance.

Theoretical considerations have led Mr. Tesla to believe that these drawbacks could be eliminated by using currents with a sufficiently high frequency, and his expectations have been confirmed in practice. These rapidly alternating currents make it possible to maintain small arcs that also have the advantages of being quiet and consistent. This consistency is due to the rapid alternations, which prevent the arc from cooling down, keeping it at a high temperature and low resistance.

At the outset of his experiments Mr. Tesla encountered great difficulties in the construction of high frequency machines. A generator of this kind is described here, which, though constructed quite some time ago, is well worthy of a detailed description. It may be mentioned, in passing, that dynamos of this type have been used by Mr. Tesla in his lighting researches and experiments with currents of high potential and high frequency, and reference to them will be found in his lectures elsewhere printed in this volume.[4]

At the start of his experiments, Mr. Tesla faced significant challenges in building high-frequency machines. A generator of this type is described here, which, although made quite some time ago, deserves a thorough description. It's worth noting that Mr. Tesla has used dynamos of this kind in his lighting research and experiments with high potential and high-frequency currents, and you can find references to them in his lectures printed elsewhere in this volume.[4]

In the accompanying engravings, Figs. 199 and 200 show the machine, respectively, in side elevation and vertical cross-section; Figs. 201, 202 and 203 showing enlarged details of construction. As will be seen, A is an annular magnetic frame, the interior of which is provided with a large number of pole-pieces D.

In the accompanying illustrations, Figs. 199 and 200 show the machine from the side and in a vertical cross-section, while Figs. 201, 202, and 203 display enlarged details of construction. As you can see, A is a ring-shaped magnetic frame, the inside of which contains many pole pieces D.

Owing to the very large number and small size of the poles and the spaces between them, the field coils are applied by winding an insulated conductor F zigzag through the grooves, as shown in Fig. 203, carrying the wire around the annulus to form as many layers as is desired. In this way the pole-pieces D will be energized with alternately opposite polarity around the entire ring.

Due to the very large number and small size of the poles and the spaces between them, the field coils are created by winding an insulated conductor F in a zigzag pattern through the grooves, as shown in Fig. 203, wrapping the wire around the annulus to create as many layers as needed. This way, the pole pieces D will be energized with alternating opposite polarities around the entire ring.

For the armature, Mr. Tesla employs a spider carrying a ring J, turned down, except at its edges, to form a trough-like receptacle for a mass of fine annealed iron wires K, which are wound in the groove to form the core proper for the armature-coils. Pins L are set in the sides of the ring J and the coils M are wound over the periphery of the armature-structure and around the pins. The coils M are connected together in series, and these terminals N carried through the hollow shaft H to contact-rings P P, from which the currents are taken off by brushes O.

For the armature, Mr. Tesla uses a spider that has a ring J, tilted down except at the edges, creating a trough-like container for a bunch of fine annealed iron wires K, which are wrapped in the groove to make the core for the armature coils. Pins L are placed on the sides of the ring J, and the coils M are wound around the edge of the armature structure and around the pins. The coils M are connected in series, and these terminals N pass through the hollow shaft H to contact rings P P, from which the currents are collected by brushes O.

Fig. 199. Fig. 199.

In this way a machine with a very large number of poles may be constructed. It is easy, for instance, to obtain in this manner three hundred and seventy-five to four hundred poles in a machine that may be safely driven at a speed of fifteen hundred or sixteen hundred revolutions per minute, which will produce ten[Pg 376] thousand or eleven thousand alternations of current per second. Arc lamps R R are shown in the diagram as connected up in series with the machine in Fig. 200. If such a current be applied to running arc lamps, the sound produced by or in the arc becomes practically inaudible, for, by increasing the rate of change in the current, and consequently the number of vibrations per unit of time of the gaseous material of the arc up to, or beyond, ten thousand or eleven thousand per second, or to what is regarded as the limit of audition, the sound due to such vibrations will not be audible. The exact number of changes or undulations necessary to produce this result will vary somewhat according to the size of the arc—that is to say, the smaller the arc, the greater the number of changes that will be required to render it inaudible within certain limits. It should also be stated that the arc should not exceed a certain length.

In this way, a machine with a very large number of poles can be constructed. It's easy, for example, to obtain three hundred seventy-five to four hundred poles in a machine that can safely operate at a speed of fifteen hundred to sixteen hundred revolutions per minute, which will generate ten[Pg 376] thousand to eleven thousand alternations of current per second. Arc lamps R R are shown in the diagram as connected in series with the machine in Fig. 200. If such a current is applied to running arc lamps, the sound produced by or in the arc becomes practically inaudible because, by increasing the rate of change in the current, and consequently the number of vibrations per unit of time of the gaseous material of the arc up to or beyond ten thousand to eleven thousand per second, or to what is considered the limit of hearing, the sound from such vibrations won't be audible. The exact number of changes or undulations needed to produce this effect will vary somewhat depending on the size of the arc—that is, the smaller the arc, the greater the number of changes required to make it inaudible within certain limits. It should also be noted that the arc should not exceed a certain length.

Fig. 200, 201, 202 and 203. Figs 200-203.

The difficulties encountered in the construction of these machines are of a mechanical as well as an electrical nature. The machines may be designed on two plans: the field may be formed either of alternating poles, or of polar projections of the same polarity. Up to about 15,000 alternations per second in an experimental machine, the former plan may be followed, but a more efficient machine is obtained on the second plan.

The challenges faced in building these machines are both mechanical and electrical. The machines can be designed in two ways: the field can be created with either alternating poles or polar projections of the same polarity. For experimental machines, the first approach can be used up to about 15,000 alternations per second, but a more efficient machine is achieved with the second approach.

In the machine above described, which was capable of running two arcs of normal candle power, the field was composed of a[Pg 377] ring of wrought iron 32 inches outside diameter, and about 1 inch thick. The inside diameter was 30 inches. There were 384 polar projections. The wire was wound in zigzag form, but two wires were wound so as to completely envelop the projections. The distance between the projections is about 3/16 inch, and they are a little over 1/16 inch thick. The field magnet was made relatively small so as to adapt the machine for a constant current. There are 384 coils connected in two series. It was found impracticable to use any wire much thicker than No. 26 B. and S. gauge on account of the local effects. In such a machine the clearance should be as small as possible; for this reason the machine was made only 1¼ inch wide, so that the binding wires might be obviated. The armature wires must be wound with great care, as they are apt to fly off in consequence of the great peripheral speed. In various experiments this machine has been run as high as 3,000 revolutions per minute. Owing to the great speed it was possible to obtain as high as 10 amperes out of the machine. The electromotive force was regulated by means of an adjustable condenser within very wide limits, the limits being the greater, the greater the speed. This machine was frequently used to run Mr. Tesla's laboratory lights.

In the machine described above, which was able to operate two arcs of standard candle power, the field consisted of a[Pg 377]ring of wrought iron with an outer diameter of 32 inches and a thickness of about 1 inch. The inner diameter measured 30 inches. There were 384 polar projections. The wiring was arranged in a zigzag pattern, with two wires wound to completely cover the projections. The spacing between the projections is approximately 3/16 inch, and they are slightly over 1/16 inch thick. The field magnet was kept relatively small to make the machine suitable for a constant current. There are 384 coils connected in two series. It was found impractical to use any wire thicker than No. 26 B. and S. gauge due to local effects. In such a machine, the clearance should be minimized; for this reason, the machine was designed to be only 1¼ inch wide, eliminating the need for binding wires. The armature wires must be wound very carefully, as they are prone to fly off due to the high peripheral speed. In various experiments, this machine has operated at speeds of up to 3,000 revolutions per minute. Because of the high speed, it was possible to achieve output of up to 10 amperes from the machine. The electromotive force was adjusted using an adjustable condenser within very wide limits, with the range increasing as the speed increased. This machine was often used to power Mr. Tesla's laboratory lights.

Fig. 204. Fig. 204.

The machine above described was only one of many such types constructed. It serves well for an experimental machine, but if still higher alternations are required and higher efficiency is necessary, then a machine on a plan shown in Figs. 204 to[Pg 378] 207, is preferable. The principal advantage of this type of machine is that there is not much magnetic leakage, and that a field may be produced, varying greatly in intensity in places not much distant from each other.

The machine described above is just one of many similar designs that have been built. It works well as a test machine, but if you need even greater variations and higher efficiency, then a machine based on the designs shown in Figs. 204 to[Pg 378] 207 is a better choice. The main advantage of this type of machine is that it experiences minimal magnetic leakage and can generate a field with significantly varying intensity in areas that are close to each other.

In these engravings, Figs. 204 and 205 illustrate a machine in which the armature conductor and field coils are stationary, while the field magnet core revolves. Fig. 206 shows a machine embodying the same plan of construction, but having a stationary field magnet and rotary armature.

In these engravings, Figs. 204 and 205 show a machine where the armature conductor and field coils stay in place, while the field magnet core spins. Fig. 206 illustrates a machine with the same design, but with a stationary field magnet and a rotating armature.

The conductor in which the currents are induced may be arranged in various ways; but Mr. Tesla prefers the following method: He employs an annular plate of copper D, and by means of a saw cuts in it radial slots from one edge nearly through to the other, beginning alternately from opposite edges. In this way a continuous zigzag conductor is formed. When the polar projections are 1/8 inch wide, the width of the conductor should not, under any circumstances, be more than 1/32 inch wide; even then the eddy effect is considerable.

The conductor where the currents are created can be set up in different ways, but Mr. Tesla prefers this method: He uses an annular copper plate D, and with a saw, he cuts radial slots in it from one edge almost to the other, starting alternately from opposite edges. This creates a continuous zigzag conductor. When the polar projections are 1/8 inch wide, the conductor's width should not exceed 1/32 inch under any circumstances; even then, the eddy effect is significant.

Fig. 205. Fig. 205.

To the inner edge of this plate are secured two rings of non-magnetic metal E, which are insulated from the copper conductor, but held firmly thereto by means of the bolts F. Within the rings E is then placed an annular coil G, which is the energizing coil for the field magnet. The conductor D and the parts attached thereto are supported by means of the cylindrical shell or[Pg 379] casting A A, the two parts of which are brought together and clamped to the outer edge of the conductor D.

To the inside edge of this plate, two rings of non-magnetic metal E are secured. These are insulated from the copper conductor but held tightly in place by the bolts F. Inside the rings E, an annular coil G is then placed, serving as the energizing coil for the field magnet. The conductor D and its attached components are supported by the cylindrical shell or [Pg 379] casting A A, with the two parts clamped together at the outer edge of the conductor D.

Fig. 206. Fig. 206.

The core for the field magnet is built up of two circular parts H H, formed with annular grooves I, which, when the two parts are brought together, form a space for the reception of the energizing coil G. The hubs of the cores are trued off, so as to fit closely against one another, while the outer portions or flanges which form the polar faces J J, are reduced somewhat in thickness to make room for the conductor D, and are serrated on their faces. The number of serrations in the polar faces is arbitrary; but there must exist between them and the radial portions of the conductor D certain relation, which will be understood by reference to Fig. 207 in which N N represent the projections or points on one face of the core of the field, and S S the points of the other face. The conductor D is shown in this figure in section a a' designating the radial portions of the conductor, and b the insulating divisions between them. The relative width of the parts a a' and the space between any two adjacent points N N or S S is such that when the radial portions a of the conductor are passing between the opposite points N S where the field is strongest, the intermediate radial portions a' are passing through the[Pg 380] widest spaces midway between such points and where the field is weakest. Since the core on one side is of opposite polarity to the part facing it, all the projections of one polar face will be of opposite polarity to those of the other face. Hence, although the space between any two adjacent points on the same face may be extremely small, there will be no leakage of the magnetic lines between any two points of the same name, but the lines of force will pass across from one set of points to the other. The construction followed obviates to a great degree the distortion of the magnetic lines by the action of the current in the conductor D, in which it will be observed the current is flowing at any given time from the centre toward the periphery in one set of radial parts a and in the opposite direction in the adjacent parts a'.

The core for the field magnet consists of two circular pieces H H, designed with ring-shaped grooves I. When these two pieces are put together, they create a space to hold the energizing coil G. The centers of the cores are precisely shaped to fit tightly against each other, while the outer sections or flanges that create the polar faces J J are made slightly thinner to allow space for the conductor D, and they are serrated on their surfaces. The number of serrations in the polar faces can vary; however, there needs to be a specific relationship between them and the radial sections of the conductor D, which can be clarified by looking at Fig. 207, where N N shows the projections or points on one face of the field core, and S S represents the points on the opposite face. In this figure, the conductor D is depicted in section a a', indicating the radial sections of the conductor, and b signifies the insulating divisions between them. The relative width of parts a a' and the gap between any two adjacent points N N or S S is arranged so that as the radial sections a of the conductor move between the opposite points N S where the magnetic field is strongest, the intermediate radial sections a' travel through the[Pg 380] widest gaps located midway between these points, where the field is weakest. Since the core on one side has an opposing polarity to the part that faces it, all projections on one polar face will have the opposite polarity to those on the other face. Thus, even though the space between any two adjacent points on the same face can be extremely small, there will be no leakage of magnetic lines between points of the same designation; instead, the lines of force will transfer from one set of points to the other. This construction significantly reduces the distortion of magnetic lines caused by the current in the conductor D, in which the current flows from the center toward the outer edge in one group of radial parts a and in the opposite direction in the adjacent parts a'.

In order to connect the energizing coil G, Fig. 204, with a source of continuous current, Mr. Tesla utilizes two adjacent radial portions of the conductor D for connecting the terminals of the coil G with two binding posts M. For this purpose the plate D is cut entirely through, as shown, and the break thus made is bridged over by a short conductor C. The plate D is cut through to form two terminals d, which are connected to binding posts N. The core H H, when rotated by the driving pulley, generates in the conductors D an alternating current, which is taken off from the binding posts N.

To connect the energizing coil G, Fig. 204, to a continuous current source, Mr. Tesla uses two adjacent radial sections of the conductor D to link the coil's terminals G with two binding posts M. For this, the plate D is completely cut through, as shown, and the gap is bridged by a short conductor C. The plate D is cut to create two terminals d, which are connected to binding posts N. The core H H, when rotated by the driving pulley, generates an alternating current in the conductors D, which is drawn from the binding posts N.

Fig. 207. Fig. 207.

When it is desired to rotate the conductor between the faces of a stationary field magnet, the construction shown in Fig. 206, is adopted. The conductor D in this case is or may be made in substantially the same manner as above described by slotting an annular conducting-plate and supporting it between two heads O, held together by bolts o and fixed to the driving-shaft K. The inner edge of the plate or conductor D is preferably flanged to secure a firmer union between it and the heads O. It is insulated from the head. The field-magnet in this case consists of two annular parts H H, provided with annular grooves I for the reception of the coils. The flanges or faces surrounding[Pg 381] the annular groove are brought together, while the inner flanges are serrated, as in the previous case, and form the polar faces. The two parts H H are formed with a base R, upon which the machine rests. S S are non-magnetic bushings secured or set in the central opening of the cores. The conductor D is cut entirely through at one point to form terminals, from which insulated conductors T are led through the shaft to collecting-rings V.

When you want to rotate the conductor between the surfaces of a stationary field magnet, you use the construction shown in Fig. 206. The conductor D in this case is made in a similar way as described earlier by slotting an annular conducting plate and supporting it between two heads O, which are held together by bolts o and fixed to the driving shaft K. The inner edge of the plate or conductor D is preferably flanged to ensure a stronger connection between it and the heads O. It is insulated from the head. The field magnet here consists of two annular parts H H, which have annular grooves I for the coils. The flanges or surfaces around[Pg 381] the annular groove are brought together, while the inner flanges are serrated, similar to the previous case, forming the polar faces. The two parts H H rest on a base R. S S are non-magnetic bushings that are secured in the central opening of the cores. The conductor D is cut all the way through at one point to create terminals, from which insulated conductors T lead through the shaft to collecting rings V.

In one type of machine of this kind constructed by Mr. Tesla, the field had 480 polar projections on each side, and from this machine it was possible to obtain 30,000 alternations per second. As the polar projections must necessarily be very narrow, very thin wires or sheets must be used to avoid the eddy current effects. Mr. Tesla has thus constructed machines with a stationary armature and rotating field, in which case also the field-coil was supported so that the revolving part consisted only of a wrought iron body devoid of any wire and also machines with a rotating armature and stationary field. The machines may be either drum or disc, but Mr. Tesla's experience shows the latter to be preferable.

In one type of machine built by Mr. Tesla, there were 480 polar projections on each side, allowing the machine to achieve 30,000 alternations per second. Since the polar projections have to be very narrow, very thin wires or sheets have to be used to prevent eddy current effects. Mr. Tesla has designed machines with a stationary armature and a rotating field, where the field coil was also supported, so the rotating part was just a solid iron body without any wires. He also created machines with a rotating armature and a stationary field. The machines can be either drum or disc, but Mr. Tesla's experience indicates that the disc design is more effective.


In the course of a very interesting article contributed to the Electrical World in February, 1891, Mr. Tesla makes some suggestive remarks on these high frequency machines and his experiences with them, as well as with other parts of the high frequency apparatus. Part of it is quoted here and is as follows:—

In a fascinating article published in the Electrical World in February 1891, Mr. Tesla shares some intriguing insights about these high-frequency machines and his experiences with them, along with other components of high-frequency equipment. A portion of it is quoted here and reads as follows:—

The writer will incidentally mention that any one who attempts for the first time to construct such a machine will have a tale of woe to tell. He will first start out, as a matter of course, by making an armature with the required number of polar projections. He will then get the satisfaction of having produced an apparatus which is fit to accompany a thoroughly Wagnerian opera. It may besides possess the virtue of converting mechanical energy into heat in a nearly perfect manner. If there is a reversal in the polarity of the projections, he will get heat out of the machine; if there is no reversal, the heating will be less, but the output will be next to nothing. He will then abandon the iron in the armature, and he will get from the Scylla to the Charybdis. He will look for one difficulty and will find another, but, after a few trials, he may get nearly what he wanted.[Pg 382]

The writer will casually mention that anyone trying to build such a machine for the first time is bound to have a hard time. They'll typically start by creating an armature with the necessary number of polar projections. This will give them the satisfaction of having made a device that could accompany a full Wagnerian opera. Additionally, it might have the ability to convert mechanical energy into heat almost perfectly. If the polarity of the projections is reversed, they will generate heat from the machine; if not, the heating will be less, and the output will be minimal. They'll then get rid of the iron in the armature, and everything will feel like jumping from Scylla to Charybdis. They'll go looking for one problem only to stumble upon another, but after a few attempts, they might get close to what they wanted.[Pg 382]

Among the many experiments which may be performed with such a machine, of not the least interest are those performed with a high-tension induction coil. The character of the discharge is completely changed. The arc is established at much greater distances, and it is so easily affected by the slightest current of air that it often wriggles around in the most singular manner. It usually emits the rhythmical sound peculiar to the alternate current arcs, but the curious point is that the sound may be heard with a number of alternations far above ten thousand per second, which by many is considered to be about the limit of audition. In many respects the coil behaves like a static machine. Points impair considerably the sparking interval, electricity escaping from them freely, and from a wire attached to one of the terminals streams of light issue, as though it were connected to a pole of a powerful Toepler machine. All these phenomena are, of course, mostly due to the enormous differences of potential obtained. As a consequence of the self-induction of the coil and the high frequency, the current is minute while there is a corresponding rise of pressure. A current impulse of some strength started in such a coil should persist to flow no less than four ten-thousandths of a second. As this time is greater than half the period, it occurs that an opposing electromotive force begins to act while the current is still flowing. As a consequence, the pressure rises as in a tube filled with liquid and vibrated rapidly around its axis. The current is so small that, in the opinion and involuntary experience of the writer, the discharge of even a very large coil cannot produce seriously injurious effects, whereas, if the same coil were operated with a current of lower frequency, though the electromotive force would be much smaller, the discharge would be most certainly injurious. This result, however, is due in part to the high frequency. The writer's experiences tend to show that the higher the frequency the greater the amount of electrical energy which may be passed through the body without serious discomfort; whence it seems certain that human tissues act as condensers.

Among the many experiments that can be performed with such a machine, some of the most interesting involve a high-tension induction coil. The nature of the discharge is completely different. The arc can form at much greater distances, and it’s easily influenced by the slightest draft of air, causing it to move in strange ways. It usually makes a rhythmic sound typical of alternating current arcs, but the fascinating thing is that this sound can be heard with a frequency well above ten thousand per second, which many consider to be about the limit of human hearing. In many ways, the coil behaves like a static machine. Points significantly reduce the sparking distance, allowing electricity to escape from them freely. From a wire connected to one of the terminals, streams of light emerge, similar to how it would appear connected to a powerful Toepler machine. All these phenomena are primarily due to the huge differences in voltage achieved. Because of the coil's self-induction and the high frequency, the current is very small while the pressure rises accordingly. A strong current pulse from such a coil should continue to flow for at least four ten-thousandths of a second. Since this duration is greater than half the cycle, an opposing electromotive force starts to act while the current is still flowing. As a result, the pressure increases like a tube filled with liquid being rapidly shaken around its axis. The current is so small that, based on the writer's own experiences, the discharge from even a very large coil is unlikely to cause serious injury. However, if the same coil operates at a lower frequency, while the electromotive force would be much smaller, the discharge would definitely be harmful. This outcome is partly due to the high frequency. The writer's observations suggest that the higher the frequency, the more electrical energy can pass through the body with minimal discomfort, leading to the conclusion that human tissues behave like capacitors.

One is not quite prepared for the behavior of the coil when connected to a Leyden jar. One, of course, anticipates that since the frequency is high the capacity of the jar should be small. He therefore takes a very small jar, about the size of a small wine glass, but he finds that even with this jar the coil is practically short-circuited. He then reduces the capacity until he comes to[Pg 383] about the capacity of two spheres, say, ten centimetres in diameter and two to four centimetres apart. The discharge then assumes the form of a serrated band exactly like a succession of sparks viewed in a rapidly revolving mirror; the serrations, of course, corresponding to the condenser discharges. In this case one may observe a queer phenomenon. The discharge starts at the nearest points, works gradually up, breaks somewhere near the top of the spheres, begins again at the bottom, and so on. This goes on so fast that several serrated bands are seen at once. One may be puzzled for a few minutes, but the explanation is simple enough. The discharge begins at the nearest points, the air is heated and carries the arc upward until it breaks, when it is re-established at the nearest points, etc. Since the current passes easily through a condenser of even small capacity, it will be found quite natural that connecting only one terminal to a body of the same size, no matter how well insulated, impairs considerably the striking distance of the arc.

You're not really ready for how the coil behaves when it’s hooked up to a Leyden jar. You might expect that, because the frequency is high, the jar's capacity should be low. So, you use a tiny jar, about the size of a small wine glass, but even with that, the coil is almost short-circuited. Then you keep reducing the capacity until you get to[Pg 383] around the capacity of two spheres, say, ten centimeters in diameter and two to four centimeters apart. The discharge then looks like a serrated band, kind of like a series of sparks viewed in a quickly spinning mirror; the serrated edges match up with the condenser discharges. In this case, you can see a strange phenomenon. The discharge starts at the closest points, gradually moves up, breaks somewhere near the top of the spheres, restarts at the bottom, and then repeats. This happens so quickly that you can see several serrated bands at the same time. You might be puzzled at first, but the explanation is pretty straightforward. The discharge begins at the nearest points, the air heats up and lifts the arc until it breaks, and then it re-establishes at the closest points, and so on. Since the current flows easily through a condenser, even one with small capacity, it’s understandable that connecting just one terminal to an object of the same size, no matter how well insulated, significantly reduces the arc's striking distance.

Experiments with Geissler tubes are of special interest. An exhausted tube, devoid of electrodes of any kind, will light up at some distance from the coil. If a tube from a vacuum pump is near the coil the whole of the pump is brilliantly lighted. An incandescent lamp approached to the coil lights up and gets perceptibly hot. If a lamp have the terminals connected to one of the binding posts of the coil and the hand is approached to the bulb, a very curious and rather unpleasant discharge from the glass to the hand takes place, and the filament may become incandescent. The discharge resembles to some extent the stream issuing from the plates of a powerful Toepler machine, but is of incomparably greater quantity. The lamp in this case acts as a condenser, the rarefied gas being one coating, the operator's hand the other. By taking the globe of a lamp in the hand, and by bringing the metallic terminals near to or in contact with a conductor connected to the coil, the carbon is brought to bright incandescence and the glass is rapidly heated. With a 100-volt 10 c. p. lamp one may without great discomfort stand as much current as will bring the lamp to a considerable brilliancy; but it can be held in the hand only for a few minutes, as the glass is heated in an incredibly short time. When a tube is lighted by bringing it near to the coil it may be made to go out by interposing a metal plate on the hand between the coil and tube; but if the metal plate be fastened to a glass rod or otherwise insulated, the tube[Pg 384] may remain lighted if the plate be interposed, or may even increase in luminosity. The effect depends on the position of the plate and tube relatively to the coil, and may be always easily foretold by assuming that conduction takes place from one terminal of the coil to the other. According to the position of the plate, it may either divert from or direct the current to the tube.

Experiments with Geissler tubes are particularly fascinating. An empty tube, without any electrodes, lights up even when it’s a bit away from the coil. If you bring a vacuum pump tube close to the coil, the entire pump shines brightly. An incandescent lamp near the coil also lights up and gets noticeably hot. If you connect the lamp’s terminals to one of the coil’s binding posts and then bring your hand near the bulb, a strange and somewhat unpleasant discharge occurs from the glass to your hand, and the filament may glow brightly. This discharge is somewhat similar to the stream produced by a powerful Toepler machine, but it is significantly stronger. In this situation, the lamp functions like a capacitor, with the rarefied gas acting as one layer and the operator's hand as the other. By holding a lamp's globe in your hand and bringing the metal terminals close to or touching a conductor connected to the coil, the carbon gets heated to a bright glow, and the glass heats up quickly. With a 100-volt 10 c. p. lamp, a person can tolerate the current that produces a pretty bright light without too much discomfort; however, it can only be held in the hand for a few minutes since the glass heats up incredibly fast. When you light a tube by placing it near the coil, you can extinguish it by placing a metal plate on your hand between the coil and the tube. But if that metal plate is attached to a glass rod or otherwise insulated, the tube[Pg 384] may still stay lit when the plate is in between or might even become brighter. The effect depends on how the plate and tube are positioned relative to the coil, and you can generally predict it by assuming that conduction occurs from one terminal of the coil to the other. Depending on the plate’s position, it can either redirect the current away from the tube or direct it towards it.

In another line of work the writer has in frequent experiments maintained incandescent lamps of 50 or 100 volts burning at any desired candle power with both the terminals of each lamp connected to a stout copper wire of no more than a few feet in length. These experiments seem interesting enough, but they are not more so than the queer experiment of Faraday, which has been revived and made much of by recent investigators, and in which a discharge is made to jump between two points of a bent copper wire. An experiment may be cited here which may seem equally interesting. If a Geissler tube, the terminals of which are joined by a copper wire, be approached to the coil, certainly no one would be prepared to see the tube light up. Curiously enough, it does light up, and, what is more, the wire does not seem to make much difference. Now one is apt to think in the first moment that the impedance of the wire might have something to do with the phenomenon. But this is of course immediately rejected, as for this an enormous frequency would be required. This result, however, seems puzzling only at first; for upon reflection it is quite clear that the wire can make but little difference. It may be explained in more than one way, but it agrees perhaps best with observation to assume that conduction takes place from the terminals of the coil through the space. On this assumption, if the tube with the wire be held in any position, the wire can divert little more than the current which passes through the space occupied by the wire and the metallic terminals of the tube; through the adjacent space the current passes practically undisturbed. For this reason, if the tube be held in any position at right angles to the line joining the binding posts of the coil, the wire makes hardly any difference, but in a position more or less parallel with that line it impairs to a certain extent the brilliancy of the tube and its facility to light up. Numerous other phenomena may be explained on the same assumption. For instance, if the ends of the tube be provided with washers of sufficient size and held in the line joining the terminals of the coil, it will not light up, and then nearly the whole of the current, which would otherwise[Pg 385] pass uniformly through the space between the washers, is diverted through the wire. But if the tube be inclined sufficiently to that line, it will light up in spite of the washers. Also, if a metal plate be fastened upon a glass rod and held at right angles to the line joining the binding posts, and nearer to one of them, a tube held more or less parallel with the line will light up instantly when one of the terminals touches the plate, and will go out when separated from the plate. The greater the surface of the plate, up to a certain limit, the easier the tube will light up. When a tube is placed at right angles to the straight line joining the binding posts, and then rotated, its luminosity steadily increases until it is parallel with that line. The writer must state, however, that he does not favor the idea of a leakage or current through the space any more than as a suitable explanation, for he is convinced that all these experiments could not be performed with a static machine yielding a constant difference of potential, and that condenser action is largely concerned in these phenomena.

In another area of study, the author has frequently conducted experiments with incandescent lamps of 50 or 100 volts running at any desired brightness, with both terminals of each lamp connected to a thick copper wire only a few feet long. These experiments are interesting, but not more so than Faraday's strange experiment, which has been revived and given much attention by recent researchers, where a discharge jumps between two points of a bent copper wire. An equally interesting experiment can be mentioned here. If a Geissler tube, with its terminals connected by a copper wire, is brought close to the coil, no one would expect to see the tube light up. Surprisingly, it does light up, and notably, the wire doesn’t seem to make much of a difference. Initially, one might think that the impedance of the wire could influence this phenomenon. However, this is quickly dismissed since it would require an enormous frequency. Yet, this result may seem puzzling at first; upon reflection, it's clear that the wire has little impact. It can be explained in several ways, but the observation aligns best with the idea that conduction occurs from the terminals of the coil through the surrounding space. Based on this assumption, if the tube with the wire is held in any position, the wire can hardly divert more than the current that flows through the space occupied by the wire and the metallic terminals of the tube; the current moves almost undisturbed through the adjacent space. Therefore, if the tube is held in any position perpendicular to the line connecting the binding posts of the coil, the wire hardly makes a difference. However, if positioned more or less parallel to that line, it somewhat reduces the brightness of the tube and its ability to light up. Many other phenomena can be explained with the same idea. For instance, if the ends of the tube have large washers and are aligned with the terminals of the coil, it won’t light up, as nearly all the current that would have passed evenly through the space between the washers is redirected through the wire. Yet, if the tube is tilted enough away from that line, it will light up regardless of the washers. Additionally, if a metal plate is attached to a glass rod and held perpendicular to the line connecting the binding posts and closer to one of them, a tube held parallel to that line will instantly light up when one of its terminals touches the plate, and will go out when separated. The larger the surface area of the plate, up to a limit, the easier it is for the tube to light up. When a tube is positioned perpendicular to the straight line connecting the binding posts and then rotated, its brightness steadily increases until it aligns with that line. However, the author must express that he does not support the notion of a current leaking through the space as an appropriate explanation, as he is convinced that these experiments could not be conducted with a static machine providing a constant potential difference, and that condenser action plays a significant role in these phenomena.

It is well to take certain precautions when operating a Ruhmkorff coil with very rapidly alternating currents. The primary current should not be turned on too long, else the core may get so hot as to melt the gutta-percha or paraffin, or otherwise injure the insulation, and this may occur in a surprisingly short time, considering the current's strength. The primary current being turned on, the fine wire terminals may be joined without great risk, the impedance being so great that it is difficult to force enough current through the fine wire so as to injure it, and in fact the coil may be on the whole much safer when the terminals of the fine wire are connected than when they are insulated; but special care should be taken when the terminals are connected to the coatings of a Leyden jar, for with anywhere near the critical capacity, which just counteracts the self-induction at the existing frequency, the coil might meet the fate of St. Polycarpus. If an expensive vacuum pump is lighted up by being near to the coil or touched with a wire connected to one of the terminals, the current should be left on no more than a few moments, else the glass will be cracked by the heating of the rarefied gas in one of the narrow passages—in the writer's own experience quod erat demonstrandum.[5]

It’s important to take some precautions when using a Ruhmkorff coil with very quickly alternating currents. The primary current shouldn’t be on for too long, or the core could get so hot that it melts the gutta-percha or paraffin, or otherwise damage the insulation, and this can happen surprisingly quickly given the strength of the current. When the primary current is turned on, the fine wire terminals can be connected without much risk, as the impedance is so high that it’s hard to push enough current through the fine wire to damage it. In fact, the coil can actually be safer when the fine wire terminals are connected than when they are insulated; however, extra caution should be taken when the terminals are connected to the coatings of a Leyden jar, because with a capacity close to the critical point, which just balances the self-induction at the current frequency, the coil could experience a fate similar to St. Polycarpus. If an expensive vacuum pump is activated by being near the coil or touched with a wire connected to one of the terminals, the current should only be on for a few moments, or the glass could crack due to the heating of the rarefied gas in one of the narrow passages—in my own experience quod erat demonstrandum.[5]

There are a good many other points of interest which may be observed in connection with such a machine. Experiments with the telephone, a conductor in a strong field or with a condenser or arc, seem to afford certain proof that sounds far above the usual accepted limit of hearing would be perceived. A telephone will emit notes of twelve to thirteen thousand vibrations per second; then the inability of the core to follow such rapid alternations begins to tell. If, however, the magnet and core be replaced by a condenser and the terminals connected to the high-tension secondary of a transformer, higher notes may still be heard. If the current be sent around a finely laminated core and a small piece of thin sheet iron be held gently against the core, a sound may be still heard with thirteen to fourteen thousand alternations per second, provided the current is sufficiently strong. A small coil, however, tightly packed between the poles of a powerful magnet, will emit a sound with the above number of alternations, and arcs may be audible with a still higher frequency. The limit of audition is variously estimated. In Sir William Thomson's writings it is stated somewhere that ten thousand per second, or nearly so, is the limit. Other, but less reliable, sources give it as high as twenty-four thousand per second. The above experiments have convinced the writer that notes of an incomparably higher number of vibrations per second would be perceived provided they could be produced with sufficient power. There is no reason why it should not be so. The condensations and rarefactions of the air would necessarily set the diaphragm in a corresponding vibration and some sensation would be produced, whatever—within certain limits—the velocity of transmission to their nerve centres, though it is probable that for want of exercise the ear would not be able to distinguish any such high note. With the eye it is different; if the sense of vision is based upon some resonance effect, as many believe, no amount of increase in the intensity of the ethereal vibration could extend our range of vision on either side of the visible spectrum.

There are a lot of other interesting things to note about such a machine. Experiments with the telephone, a conductor in a strong field, or with a capacitor or arc show that sounds well above the usual hearing range can be detected. A telephone can produce notes with twelve to thirteen thousand vibrations per second; after that, the core struggles to keep up with the rapid changes. However, if you replace the magnet and core with a capacitor and connect it to the high-tension secondary of a transformer, even higher notes can still be heard. When the current flows through a finely laminated core and you gently hold a small piece of thin sheet metal against the core, a sound can be heard at thirteen to fourteen thousand vibrations per second, as long as the current is strong enough. A small coil tightly packed between the poles of a powerful magnet will produce a sound at that frequency, and arcs may even be audible at even higher frequencies. The limit of hearing is estimated differently. In Sir William Thomson's writings, it is mentioned that about ten thousand per second is the limit. Other, but less reliable, sources suggest it could be as high as twenty-four thousand per second. These experiments have convinced me that sounds with an incomparably higher number of vibrations per second could be detected if they could be generated with enough power. There’s no reason it shouldn't be possible. The compressions and rarefactions in the air would cause the diaphragm to vibrate accordingly, producing some sensation, regardless of the speed of transmission to the nerve centers, although it’s likely that without practice, the ear wouldn’t be able to distinguish such high notes. The situation is different with sight; if our vision relies on some resonance effect, as many believe, then no amount of increased ethereal vibration intensity could expand our range of vision beyond the visible spectrum.

The limit of audition of an arc depends on its size. The greater the surface by a given heating effect in the arc, the higher the limit of audition. The highest notes are emitted by the high-tension discharges of an induction coil in which the arc is, so to speak, all surface. If R be the resistance of an arc, and C the current, and the linear dimensions be n times increased, then[Pg 387] the resistance is R/n, and with the same current density the current would be n2C; hence the heating effect is n3 times greater, while the surface is only n2 times as great. For this reason very large arcs would not emit any rhythmical sound even with a very low frequency. It must be observed, however, that the sound emitted depends to some extent also on the composition of the carbon. If the carbon contain highly refractory material, this, when heated, tends to maintain the temperature of the arc uniform and the sound is lessened; for this reason it would seem that an alternating arc requires such carbons.

The sound produced by an arc depends on its size. The larger the surface area affected by the heating effect in the arc, the higher the sound limit. The highest notes come from the high-voltage discharges of an induction coil, where the arc essentially has maximum surface area. If R represents the resistance of an arc, and C denotes the current, when the linear dimensions are increased by a factor of n, then[Pg 387] the resistance becomes R/n, and if the current density remains the same, the current would be n2C; thus the heating effect is n3 times greater, while the surface area is only n2 times larger. For this reason, very large arcs would not produce any rhythmic sound, even at very low frequencies. It should be noted, however, that the sound produced also partly depends on the type of carbon used. If the carbon contains highly heat-resistant materials, these tend to keep the temperature of the arc stable when heated, resulting in a quieter sound; consequently, it appears that an alternating arc benefits from such types of carbon.

With currents of such high frequencies it is possible to obtain noiseless arcs, but the regulation of the lamp is rendered extremely difficult on account of the excessively small attractions or repulsions between conductors conveying these currents.

With high-frequency currents, it's possible to achieve noiseless arcs, but controlling the lamp becomes really challenging due to the very weak attractions or repulsions between the conductors carrying these currents.

An interesting feature of the arc produced by these rapidly alternating currents is its persistency. There are two causes for it, one of which is always present, the other sometimes only. One is due to the character of the current and the other to a property of the machine. The first cause is the more important one, and is due directly to the rapidity of the alternations. When an arc is formed by a periodically undulating current, there is a corresponding undulation in the temperature of the gaseous column, and, therefore, a corresponding undulation in the resistance of the arc. But the resistance of the arc varies enormously with the temperature of the gaseous column, being practically infinite when the gas between the electrodes is cold. The persistence of the arc, therefore, depends on the inability of the column to cool. It is for this reason impossible to maintain an arc with the current alternating only a few times a second. On the other hand, with a practically continuous current, the arc is easily maintained, the column being constantly kept at a high temperature and low resistance. The higher the frequency the smaller the time interval during which the arc may cool and increase considerably in resistance. With a frequency of 10,000 per second or more in an arc of equal size excessively small variations of temperature are superimposed upon a steady temperature, like ripples on the surface of a deep sea. The heating effect is practically continuous and the arc behaves like one produced by a continuous current, with the exception, however, that it may not be quite as easily started, and that the electrodes are equally[Pg 388] consumed; though the writer has observed some irregularities in this respect.

A notable feature of the arc created by these rapidly alternating currents is its persistence. There are two reasons for this: one is always present, while the other sometimes occurs. One reason relates to the nature of the current, and the other to a characteristic of the machine. The first reason is the more significant one, directly linked to how quickly the alternations occur. When an arc forms from a current that changes periodically, there’s a corresponding fluctuation in the temperature of the gas column, which in turn affects the arc's resistance. The resistance of the arc changes dramatically with the temperature of the gas, being almost infinite when the gas between the electrodes is cold. Therefore, the persistence of the arc relies on the gas column's inability to cool down. This is why it's impossible to maintain an arc with a current that alternates just a few times per second. In contrast, with a nearly continuous current, the arc is easily sustained because the gas column remains at a high temperature and low resistance. The higher the frequency, the shorter the time period available for the arc to cool down and significantly increase its resistance. At a frequency of 10,000 times per second or more in an arc of similar size, very small temperature variations occur over a stable temperature, much like ripples on a deep ocean's surface. The heating effect remains virtually continuous, making the arc behave similarly to one produced by a continuous current, except that it may not be as easy to start, and the electrodes are equally consumed; although the writer has noticed some inconsistencies regarding this.

The second cause alluded to, which possibly may not be present, is due to the tendency of a machine of such high frequency to maintain a practically constant current. When the arc is lengthened, the electromotive force rises in proportion and the arc appears to be more persistent.

The second reason mentioned, which might not actually be there, is because a machine that operates at such a high frequency tends to keep a nearly steady current. When the arc is lengthened, the electromotive force increases accordingly, and the arc seems to stay on more consistently.

Such a machine is eminently adapted to maintain a constant current, but it is very unfit for a constant potential. As a matter of fact, in certain types of such machines a nearly constant current is an almost unavoidable result. As the number of poles or polar projections is greatly increased, the clearance becomes of great importance. One has really to do with a great number of very small machines. Then there is the impedance in the armature, enormously augmented by the high frequency. Then, again, the magnetic leakage is facilitated. If there are three or four hundred alternate poles, the leakage is so great that it is virtually the same as connecting, in a two-pole machine, the poles by a piece of iron. This disadvantage, it is true, may be obviated more or less by using a field throughout of the same polarity, but then one encounters difficulties of a different nature. All these things tend to maintain a constant current in the armature circuit.

Such a machine is really good at keeping a steady current, but it's not suitable for maintaining a constant voltage. In fact, in some types of these machines, a nearly constant current is almost unavoidable. As the number of poles or polar projections increases significantly, the space between them becomes crucial. Essentially, you're dealing with a lot of very small machines. There's also the impedance in the armature, which increases dramatically due to the high frequency. Additionally, magnetic leakage becomes more pronounced. If there are three or four hundred alternating poles, the leakage is so significant that it's almost like connecting the poles with a piece of iron in a two-pole machine. This issue can be somewhat avoided by using a field of the same polarity throughout, but that brings its own set of challenges. All of these factors contribute to maintaining a constant current in the armature circuit.

In this connection it is interesting to notice that even to-day engineers are astonished at the performance of a constant current machine, just as, some years ago, they used to consider it an extraordinary performance if a machine was capable of maintaining a constant potential difference between the terminals. Yet one result is just as easily secured as the other. It must only be remembered that in an inductive apparatus of any kind, if constant potential is required, the inductive relation between the primary or exciting and secondary or armature circuit must be the closest possible; whereas, in an apparatus for constant current just the opposite is required. Furthermore, the opposition to the current's flow in the induced circuit must be as small as possible in the former and as great as possible in the latter case. But opposition to a current's flow may be caused in more than one way. It may be caused by ohmic resistance or self-induction. One may make the induced circuit of a dynamo machine or transformer of such high resistance that when operating devices of considerably smaller resistance within very wide limits a[Pg 389] nearly constant current is maintained. But such high resistance involves a great loss in power, hence it is not practicable. Not so self-induction. Self-induction does not necessarily mean loss of power. The moral is, use self-induction instead of resistance. There is, however, a circumstance which favors the adoption of this plan, and this is, that a very high self-induction may be obtained cheaply by surrounding a comparatively small length of wire more or less completely with iron, and, furthermore, the effect may be exalted at will by causing a rapid undulation of the current. To sum up, the requirements for constant current are: Weak magnetic connection between the induced and inducing circuits, greatest possible self-induction with the least resistance, greatest practicable rate of change of the current. Constant potential, on the other hand, requires: Closest magnetic connection between the circuits, steady induced current, and, if possible, no reaction. If the latter conditions could be fully satisfied in a constant potential machine, its output would surpass many times that of a machine primarily designed to give constant current. Unfortunately, the type of machine in which these conditions may be satisfied is of little practical value, owing to the small electromotive force obtainable and the difficulties in taking off the current.

In this context, it's interesting to note that even today, engineers are amazed by the performance of a constant current machine, just as they used to consider it impressive if a machine could maintain a constant voltage between its terminals. However, achieving one result is just as straightforward as achieving the other. It's important to remember that in any inductive device, if you need a constant voltage, the inductive relationship between the primary (or exciting) circuit and the secondary (or armature) circuit must be as close as possible; on the other hand, a constant current machine requires the exact opposite. Additionally, the opposition to the current flow in the induced circuit should be minimal in the former case and maximized in the latter. But opposition to current flow can arise in multiple ways, including ohmic resistance or self-induction. You can make the induced circuit of a dynamo or transformer with such high resistance that when connected to devices with significantly lower resistance, a nearly constant current is maintained. However, this high resistance results in a considerable power loss, making it impractical. In contrast, self-induction doesn’t necessarily result in power loss. The takeaway is to prefer self-induction over resistance. There’s also a factor that supports this approach: you can achieve very high self-induction cheaply by wrapping a relatively short length of wire with iron, and you can further enhance this effect by rapidly fluctuating the current. In summary, the requirements for constant current are: a weak magnetic connection between the induced and inducing circuits, the highest possible self-induction with least resistance, and the greatest feasible rate of current change. Meanwhile, constant voltage requires: a tight magnetic connection between the circuits, a steady induced current, and ideally no reaction. If these conditions could be fully met in a constant voltage machine, its output would far exceed that of a machine primarily designed for constant current. Unfortunately, the types of machines that could satisfy these conditions have limited practical value due to their low electromotive force and the challenges in extracting the current.

With their keen inventor's instinct, the now successful arc-light men have early recognized the desiderata of a constant current machine. Their arc light machines have weak fields, large armatures, with a great length of copper wire and few commutator segments to produce great variations in the current's strength and to bring self-induction into play. Such machines may maintain within considerable limits of variation in the resistance of the circuit a practically constant current. Their output is of course correspondingly diminished, and, perhaps with the object in view not to cut down the output too much, a simple device compensating exceptional variations is employed. The undulation of the current is almost essential to the commercial success of an arc-light system. It introduces in the circuit a steadying element taking the place of a large ohmic resistance, without involving a great loss in power, and, what is more important, it allows the use of simple clutch lamps, which with a current of a certain number of impulses per second, best suitable for each particular lamp, will, if properly attended to, regulate even better than the finest clock-work lamps. This discovery has been made by the writer—several years too late.[Pg 390]

With their sharp inventor's instinct, the now successful arc-light manufacturers quickly recognized the need for a constant current machine. Their arc light machines have weak magnetic fields, large armatures, a lot of copper wire, and few commutator segments to create significant variations in the current's strength and to utilize self-induction. These machines can maintain a nearly constant current even with considerable changes in the resistance of the circuit. Of course, their output is reduced, and perhaps to avoid cutting down the output too much, a simple device is used to compensate for exceptional variations. The fluctuation of the current is almost essential for the commercial success of an arc-light system. It adds a steadying component to the circuit that acts as a large ohmic resistance without causing a significant power loss. More importantly, it enables the use of simple clutch lamps, which, with a specific number of impulses per second suitable for each lamp, can, if properly managed, regulate even better than the finest clockwork lamps. This finding has been made by the writer—several years too late.[Pg 390]

It has been asserted by competent English electricians that in a constant-current machine or transformer the regulation is effected by varying the phase of the secondary current. That this view is erroneous may be easily proved by using, instead of lamps, devices each possessing self-induction and capacity or self-induction and resistance—that is, retarding and accelerating components—in such proportions as to not affect materially the phase of the secondary current. Any number of such devices may be inserted or cut out, still it will be found that the regulation occurs, a constant current being maintained, while the electromotive force is varied with the number of the devices. The change of phase of the secondary current is simply a result following from the changes in resistance, and, though secondary reaction is always of more or less importance, yet the real cause of the regulation lies in the existence of the conditions above enumerated. It should be stated, however, that in the case of a machine the above remarks are to be restricted to the cases in which the machine is independently excited. If the excitation be effected by commutating the armature current, then the fixed position of the brushes makes any shifting of the neutral line of the utmost importance, and it may not be thought immodest of the writer to mention that, as far as records go, he seems to have been the first who has successfully regulated machines by providing a bridge connection between a point of the external circuit and the commutator by means of a third brush. The armature and field being properly proportioned and the brushes placed in their determined positions, a constant current or constant potential resulted from the shifting of the diameter of commutation by the varying loads.

Competent English electricians have claimed that in a constant-current machine or transformer, regulation is achieved by changing the phase of the secondary current. This belief can easily be proven wrong by using devices with self-induction and capacitance or self-induction and resistance—essentially, delaying and speeding up components—in proportions that don’t significantly affect the phase of the secondary current. You can add or remove any number of these devices, and it will still be found that regulation occurs, maintaining a constant current while the electromotive force changes with the number of devices. The change in the phase of the secondary current is simply a consequence of changes in resistance, and while secondary reaction is always somewhat significant, the real reason for regulation lies in the conditions mentioned above. However, it should be noted that for a machine, these comments apply only when the machine is independently excited. If the excitation is done by commutating the armature current, then the fixed position of the brushes makes any shift of the neutral line critically important. The writer humbly notes that, as far as records indicate, they seem to have been the first to successfully regulate machines by creating a bridge connection between a point of the external circuit and the commutator using a third brush. With the armature and field properly proportioned and the brushes placed accurately, a constant current or constant potential was achieved from the shifting diameter of commutation due to varying loads.

In connection with machines of such high frequencies, the condenser affords an especially interesting study. It is easy to raise the electromotive force of such a machine to four or five times the value by simply connecting the condenser to the circuit, and the writer has continually used the condenser for the the purposes of regulation, as suggested by Blakesley in his book on alternate currents, in which he has treated the most frequently occurring condenser problems with exquisite simplicity and clearness. The high frequency allows the use of small capacities and renders investigation easy. But, although in most of the experiments the result may be foretold, some phenomena observed seem at first curious. One experiment performed three or four months ago with such a machine and a condenser may serve as an il[Pg 391]lustration. A machine was used giving about 20,000 alternations per second. Two bare wires about twenty feet long and two millimetres in diameter, in close proximity to each other, were connected to the terminals of the machine at the one end, and to a condenser at the other. A small transformer without an iron core, of course, was used to bring the reading within range of a Cardew voltmeter by connecting the voltmeter to the secondary. On the terminals of the condenser the electromotive force was about 120 volts, and from there inch by inch it gradually fell until at the terminals of the machine it was about 65 volts. It was virtually as though the condenser were a generator, and the line and armature circuit simply a resistance connected to it. The writer looked for a case of resonance, but he was unable to augment the effect by varying the capacity very carefully and gradually or by changing the speed of the machine. A case of pure resonance he was unable to obtain. When a condenser was connected to the terminals of the machine—the self-induction of the armature being first determined in the maximum and minimum position and the mean value taken—the capacity which gave the highest electromotive force corresponded most nearly to that which just counteracted the self-induction with the existing frequency. If the capacity was increased or diminished, the electromotive force fell as expected.

With machines operating at such high frequencies, the condenser provides a particularly interesting study. It's easy to boost the electromotive force of these machines to four or five times its normal value just by connecting the condenser to the circuit. I've repeatedly used the condenser for regulation purposes, as Blakesley recommended in his book on alternating currents, where he addressed the most common condenser issues with remarkable simplicity and clarity. The high frequency allows for smaller capacities and makes investigation easier. However, while most results can be anticipated, some observed phenomena initially seem puzzling. One experiment conducted three or four months ago with such a machine and a condenser serves as an illustration. A machine producing about 20,000 alternations per second was used. Two bare wires, around twenty feet long and two millimeters in diameter, were connected to the machine terminals at one end and to a condenser at the other. A small transformer without an iron core was utilized to bring the reading within the range of a Cardew voltmeter by connecting the voltmeter to the secondary. At the condenser terminals, the electromotive force measured about 120 volts, and it gradually decreased until it was about 65 volts at the machine terminals. It was almost as if the condenser acted like a generator, with the wire and armature circuit merely a resistance connected to it. I looked for resonance but couldn’t enhance the effect by carefully and gradually adjusting the capacity or changing the machine speed. I couldn’t achieve a pure resonance scenario. When a condenser was connected to the machine terminals—after determining the self-induction of the armature in both its maximum and minimum positions and taking the average value—the capacity that resulted in the highest electromotive force closely matched the value that just countered the self-induction at the existing frequency. If the capacity was increased or decreased, the electromotive force decreased as expected.

With frequencies as high as the above mentioned, the condenser effects are of enormous importance. The condenser becomes a highly efficient apparatus capable of transferring considerable energy.

With frequencies as high as mentioned above, the condenser effects are extremely important. The condenser becomes a very efficient device capable of transferring a significant amount of energy.


In an appendix to this book will be found a description of the Tesla oscillator, which its inventor believes will among other great advantages give him the necessary high frequency conditions, while relieving him of the inconveniences that attach to generators of the type described at the beginning of this chapter.

In an appendix to this book, you'll find a description of the Tesla oscillator, which its inventor believes will, among other significant benefits, provide the necessary high frequency conditions while eliminating the drawbacks associated with the generators mentioned at the beginning of this chapter.


CHAPTER XXX.

AC Electrostatic Induction Device.[6]

About a year and a half ago while engaged in the study of alternate currents of short period, it occurred to me that such currents could be obtained by rotating charged surfaces in close proximity to conductors. Accordingly I devised various forms of experimental apparatus of which two are illustrated in the accompanying engravings.

About a year and a half ago, while I was studying short-period alternating currents, it occurred to me that I could create such currents by rotating charged surfaces near conductors. So, I designed several types of experimental equipment, two of which are shown in the accompanying illustrations.

Fig. 208. Fig. 208.

In the apparatus shown in Fig. 208, A is a ring of dry shellacked hard wood provided on its inside with two sets of tin-foil coatings, a and b, all the a coatings and all the b coatings being connected together, respectively, but independent from each other. These two sets of coatings are connected to two termi[Pg 393]nals, T. For the sake of clearness only a few coatings are shown. Inside of the ring A, and in close proximity to it there is arranged to rotate a cylinder B, likewise of dry, shellacked hard wood, and provided with two similar sets of coatings, a1 and b1, all the coatings a1 being connected to one ring and all the others, b1, to another marked + and −. These two sets, a1 and b1 are charged to a high potential by a Holtz or Wimshurst machine, and may be connected to a jar of some capacity. The inside of ring A is coated with mica in order to increase the induction and also to allow higher potentials to be used.

In the setup shown in Fig. 208, A is a ring made of dry, shellacked hard wood that has two sets of tin-foil coatings on the inside, labeled a and b. All the coatings labeled a are connected together, and all the coatings labeled b are also connected together, but they are independent of each other. These two sets of coatings are connected to two terminals, T. For clarity, only a few coatings are illustrated. Inside the ring A, and positioned close to it, is a rotating cylinder B, also made of dry, shellacked hard wood, which has two similar sets of coatings, a1 and b1. All the coatings a1 are connected to one ring, and all the coatings b1 are connected to another ring marked + and −. These two sets, a1 and b1, are charged to a high potential by a Holtz or Wimshurst machine and can be connected to a storage jar of some capacity. The inside of ring A is coated with mica to enhance induction and to enable higher potentials to be utilized.

Fig. 209. Fig. 209.

When the cylinder B with the charged coatings is rotated, a circuit connected to the terminals T is traversed by alternating currents. Another form of apparatus is illustrated in Fig. 209. In this apparatus the two sets of tin-foil coatings are glued on a plate of ebonite, and a similar plate which is rotated, and the coatings of which are charged as in Fig. 208, is provided.

When the cylinder B with the charged coatings is spun, an alternating current flows through a circuit connected to the terminals T. Another design of the device is shown in Fig. 209. In this version, two sets of tin-foil coatings are attached to a plate made of ebonite, and a similar plate that rotates is also included, with coatings charged as shown in Fig. 208.

The output of such an apparatus is very small, but some of the effects peculiar to alternating currents of short periods may be observed. The effects, however, cannot be compared with those obtainable with an induction coil which is operated by an alternate current machine of high frequency, some of which were described by me a short while ago.

The output from this device is quite minimal, but some unique effects of short-period alternating currents can be seen. However, these effects can't be matched with what you get from an induction coil powered by a high-frequency alternating current machine, some of which I discussed not long ago.


CHAPTER XXXI.

"Massage" Using High-Frequency Currents.[7]

I trust that the present brief communication will not be interpreted as an effort on my part to put myself on record as a "patent medicine" man, for a serious worker cannot despise anything more than the misuse and abuse of electricity which we have frequent occasion to witness. My remarks are elicited by the lively interest which prominent medical practitioners evince at every real advance in electrical investigation. The progress in recent years has been so great that every electrician and electrical engineer is confident that electricity will become the means of accomplishing many things that have been heretofore, with our existing knowledge, deemed impossible. No wonder then that progressive physicians also should expect to find in it a powerful tool and help in new curative processes. Since I had the honor to bring before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers some results in utilizing alternating currents of high tension, I have received many letters from noted physicians inquiring as to the physical effects of such currents of high frequency. It may be remembered that I then demonstrated that a body perfectly well insulated in air can be heated by simply connecting it with a source of rapidly alternating high potential. The heating in this case is due in all probability to the bombardment of the body by air, or possibly by some other medium, which is molecular or atomic in construction, and the presence of which has so far escaped our analysis—for according to my ideas, the true ether radiation with such frequencies as even a few millions per second must be very small. This body may be a good conductor or it may be a very poor conductor of electricity with little change in the result. The human body is, in such a case, a fine conductor, and if a person insulated in a room, or no matter where, is brought into contact with such a source of [Pg 395]rapidly alternating high potential, the skin is heated by bombardment. It is a mere question of the dimensions and character of the apparatus to produce any degree of heating desired.

I hope this brief communication won't be seen as an attempt for me to label myself as a "patent medicine" guy because a serious worker can't stand the misuse and abuse of electricity that we often see. I'm prompted to speak because of the genuine interest that prominent medical professionals show in real advancements in electrical research. The progress we've made in recent years is so significant that every electrician and electrical engineer believes that electricity will enable us to achieve many things that we previously thought were impossible with our current understanding. So it's no surprise that forward-thinking doctors expect to find a powerful tool in it for new healing methods. Since I had the privilege of presenting some results on using high-tension alternating currents to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, I've received many letters from respected doctors asking about the effects of these high-frequency currents. It might be recalled that I demonstrated how a well-insulated object in the air can be heated merely by connecting it to a source of rapidly alternating high voltage. This heating likely results from the bombardment of the object by air, or possibly another medium that has a molecular or atomic structure, which we haven't fully analyzed yet—because in my view, the true ether radiation at frequencies of even a few million per second must be very small. This object can be either a good conductor or a poor conductor of electricity, with little difference in the outcome. In this case, the human body is a good conductor, and if someone is insulated in a room or anywhere else and comes into contact with such a source of rapidly alternating high voltage, their skin heats up due to bombardment. It just depends on the size and type of the equipment used to produce the desired level of heating.

It has occurred to me whether, with such apparatus properly prepared, it would not be possible for a skilled physician to find in it a means for the effective treatment of various types of disease. The heating will, of course, be superficial, that is, on the skin, and would result, whether the person operated on were in bed or walking around a room, whether dressed in thick clothes or whether reduced to nakedness. In fact, to put it broadly, it is conceivable that a person entirely nude at the North Pole might keep himself comfortably warm in this manner.

I've been thinking about whether, with the right equipment set up, a skilled doctor could use it to effectively treat different kinds of illnesses. The heating will, of course, be superficial, meaning it will affect the skin, and it wouldn't matter if the person being treated is in bed or walking around, whether they're wearing heavy clothing or are completely undressed. In fact, to put it simply, it's possible that someone totally naked at the North Pole could keep themselves comfortably warm this way.

Without vouching for all the results, which must, of course, be determined by experience and observation, I can at least warrant the fact that heating would occur by the use of this method of subjecting the human body to bombardment by alternating currents of high potential and frequency such I have long worked with. It is only reasonable to expect that some of the novel effects will be wholly different from those obtainable with the old familiar therapeutic methods generally used. Whether they would all be beneficial or not remains to be proved.

Without guaranteeing all the outcomes, which must ultimately be established through experience and observation, I can at least confirm that heating would occur by using this method of exposing the human body to bombardment by alternating currents of high voltage and frequency that I have worked with for a long time. It's only logical to assume that some of the new effects will be completely different from those achieved with the traditional therapeutic methods commonly used. Whether they would all be beneficial or not still needs to be demonstrated.


CHAPTER XXXII.

Electric Discharge in Vacuum Tubes. [8]

In The Electrical Engineer of June 10 I have noted the description of some experiments of Prof. J. J. Thomson, on the "Electric Discharge in Vacuum Tubes," and in your issue of June 24 Prof. Elihu Thomson describes an experiment of the same kind. The fundamental idea in these experiments is to set up an electromotive force in a vacuum tube—-preferably devoid of any electrodes—by means of electro-magnetic induction, and to excite the tube in this manner.

In The Electrical Engineer from June 10, I noted the description of some experiments by Prof. J. J. Thomson on "Electric Discharge in Vacuum Tubes," and in your issue from June 24, Prof. Elihu Thomson describes a similar experiment. The main idea behind these experiments is to generate an electromotive force in a vacuum tube—ideally without any electrodes—using electromagnetic induction and to stimulate the tube this way.

As I view the subject I should, think that to any experimenter who had carefully studied the problem confronting us and who attempted to find a solution of it, this idea must present itself as naturally as, for instance, the idea of replacing the tinfoil coatings of a Leyden jar by rarefied gas and exciting luminosity in the condenser thus obtained by repeatedly charging and discharging it. The idea being obvious, whatever merit there is in this line of investigation must depend upon the completeness of the study of the subject and the correctness of the observations. The following lines are not penned with any desire on my part to put myself on record as one who has performed similar experiments, but with a desire to assist other experimenters by pointing out certain peculiarities of the phenomena observed, which, to all appearances, have not been noted by Prof. J. J. Thomson, who, however, seems to have gone about systematically in his investigations, and who has been the first to make his results known. These peculiarities noted by me would seem to be at variance with the views of Prof. J. J. Thomson, and present the phenomena in a different light.

As I consider the topic, I believe that for any researcher who has thoroughly examined the problem we face and tried to find a solution, this idea should come to mind just as naturally as the idea of replacing the tinfoil coatings of a Leyden jar with rarefied gas and creating luminosity in the resulting condenser by repeatedly charging and discharging it. The idea is obvious, so the value of this line of investigation depends on how complete the study of the subject is and the accuracy of the observations. The following lines are not written to establish myself as someone who has conducted similar experiments, but rather to help other researchers by highlighting certain peculiarities of the observed phenomena that, as far as I can tell, haven't been noted by Prof. J. J. Thomson, who, nevertheless, appears to have approached his investigations systematically and has been the first to publish his findings. The peculiarities I've observed seem to conflict with Prof. J. J. Thomson's views and present the phenomena in a different light.

My investigations in this line occupied me principally during the winter and spring of the past year. During this time many different experiments were performed, and in my exchanges of ideas [Pg 397]on this subject with Mr. Alfred S. Brown, of the Western Union Telegraph Company, various different dispositions were suggested which were carried out by me in practice. Fig. 210 may serve as an example of one of the many forms of apparatus used. This consisted of a large glass tube sealed at one end and projecting into an ordinary incandescent lamp bulb. The primary, usually consisting of a few turns of thick, well-insulated copper sheet was inserted within the tube, the inside space of the bulb furnishing the secondary. This form of apparatus was arrived at after some experimenting, and was used principally with the view of enabling me to place a polished reflecting surface on the inside of the tube, and for this purpose the last turn of the primary was covered with a thin silver sheet. In all forms of apparatus used there was no special difficulty in exciting a luminous circle or cylinder in proximity to the primary.

My research on this topic kept me busy mainly during the winter and spring of last year. During this time, I conducted various experiments, and through my discussions about this with Mr. Alfred S. Brown from the Western Union Telegraph Company, several different setups were suggested and implemented by me. Fig. 210 illustrates one example of the many types of equipment used. It consisted of a large glass tube sealed at one end and extending into a standard incandescent lamp bulb. The primary coil, usually made of a few turns of thick, well-insulated copper sheet, was placed inside the tube, with the bulb's interior space serving as the secondary. This setup was developed after several experiments and was mainly used to allow me to install a polished reflective surface on the inside of the tube, for which the last turn of the primary was covered with a thin sheet of silver. There were no particular challenges in creating a glowing circle or cylinder near the primary in any of the equipment used.

Fig. 210. Fig. 210.

As to the number of turns, I cannot quite understand why Prof. J. J. Thomson should think that a few turns were "quite sufficient," but lest I should impute to him an opinion he may not have, I will add that I have gained this impression from the reading of the published abstracts of his lecture. Clearly, the number of turns which gives the best result in any case, is dependent on the dimensions of the apparatus, and, were it not for various considerations, one turn would always give the best result.

As for the number of turns, I don't really get why Prof. J. J. Thomson believes that a few turns are "quite sufficient," but to avoid assuming he holds an opinion he might not, I’ll mention that this impression comes from reading the published summaries of his lecture. Clearly, the number of turns that yields the best result in any situation depends on the size of the equipment, and if it weren't for various factors, one turn would always deliver the best outcome.

I have found that it is preferable to use in these experiments an alternate current machine giving a moderate number of alter[Pg 398]nations per second to excite the induction coil for charging the Leyden jar which discharges through the primary—shown diagrammatically in Fig. 211,—as in such case, before the disruptive discharge takes place, the tube or bulb is slightly excited and the formation of the luminous circle is decidedly facilitated. But I have also used a Wimshurst machine in some experiments.

I found that it's better to use an alternating current machine that provides a moderate number of alternations per second to energize the induction coil for charging the Leyden jar, which discharges through the primary—shown in Fig. 211. In this case, before the disruptive discharge occurs, the tube or bulb gets lightly energized, which definitely helps form the luminous circle. I've also used a Wimshurst machine in some experiments.

Fig. 211. Fig. 211.

Prof. J. J. Thomson's view of the phenomena under consideration seems to be that they are wholly due to electro-magnetic action. I was, at one time, of the same opinion, but upon carefully investigating the subject I was led to the conviction that they are more of an electrostatic nature. It must be remembered that in these experiments we have to deal with primary currents of an enormous frequency or rate of change and of high potential, and that the secondary conductor consists of a rarefied gas, and that under such conditions electrostatic effects must play an important part.

Prof. J. J. Thomson believes that the phenomena we’re looking at are entirely caused by electromagnetic action. I used to agree with him, but after doing a thorough investigation, I became convinced that they are more related to electrostatic effects. It’s important to remember that in these experiments, we are dealing with primary currents that have an incredibly high frequency and high potential, and the secondary conductor is made up of a rarefied gas. Under these conditions, electrostatic effects must be significant.

Fig. 212. Fig. 212.

In support of my view I will describe a few experiments made by me. To excite luminosity in the tube it is not absolutely necessary that the conductor should be closed. For instance, if[Pg 399] an ordinary exhausted tube (preferably of large diameter) be surrounded by a spiral of thick copper wire serving as the primary, a feebly luminous spiral may be induced in the tube, roughly shown in Fig. 212. In one of these experiments a curious phenomenon was observed; namely, two intensely luminous circles, each of them close to a turn of the primary spiral, were formed inside of the tube, and I attributed this phenomenon to the existence of nodes on the primary. The circles were connected by a faint luminous spiral parallel to the primary and in close proximity to it. To produce this effect I have found it necessary to strain the jar to the utmost. The turns of the spiral tend to close and form circles, but this, of course, would be expected, and does not necessarily indicate an electro-magnetic effect; Whereas the fact that a glow can be produced along the primary in the form of an open spiral argues for an electrostatic effect.

To support my view, I'll describe a few experiments I conducted. It's not absolutely necessary for the conductor to be closed to create luminosity in the tube. For example, if an ordinary evacuated tube (preferably large in diameter) is surrounded by a thick copper wire spiral acting as the primary, a faintly luminous spiral can be induced inside the tube, as roughly shown in Fig. 212. In one of these experiments, I observed an interesting phenomenon: two intensely luminous circles formed near each turn of the primary spiral inside the tube, and I attributed this to the presence of nodes on the primary. The circles were connected by a faint luminous spiral that ran parallel to the primary and was very close to it. I found that to produce this effect, I had to stretch the jar to its limit. The turns of the spiral tend to close and form circles, which is to be expected and doesn’t necessarily indicate an electromagnetic effect; however, the fact that a glow can appear along the primary in the form of an open spiral suggests an electrostatic effect.

Fig. 213. Fig. 213.

In using Dr. Lodge's recoil circuit, the electrostatic action is likewise apparent. The arrangement is illustrated in Fig. 213. In his experiment two hollow exhausted tubes H H were slipped over the wires of the recoil circuit and upon discharging the jar in the usual manner luminosity was excited in the tubes.

In Dr. Lodge's recoil circuit, the electrostatic action is also clear. The setup is shown in Fig. 213. In his experiment, two empty tubes H H were placed over the wires of the recoil circuit, and when the jar was discharged in the usual way, the tubes lit up.

Another experiment performed is illustrated in Fig. 214. In this case an ordinary lamp-bulb was surrounded by one or two turns of thick copper wire P and the luminous circle L excited in the bulb by discharging the jar through the primary. The lamp-bulb was provided with a tinfoil coating on the side opposite to the primary and each time the tinfoil coating was connected to the ground or to a large object the luminosity of the circle was considerably increased. This was evidently due to electrostatic action.

Another experiment shown is illustrated in Fig. 214. In this case, an ordinary light bulb was wrapped in one or two turns of thick copper wire P, and the glowing circle L was produced in the bulb by discharging the jar through the primary. The light bulb had a tinfoil coating on the side opposite the primary, and every time the tinfoil coating was connected to the ground or a large object, the brightness of the circle increased significantly. This was clearly due to electrostatic action.

In other experiments I have noted that when the primary touches the glass the luminous circle is easier produced and is[Pg 400] more sharply defined; but I have not noted that, generally speaking, the circles induced were very sharply defined, as Prof. J. J. Thomson has observed; on the contrary, in my experiments they were broad and often the whole of the bulb or tube was illuminated; and in one case I have observed an intensely purplish glow, to which Prof. J. J. Thomson refers. But the circles were always in close proximity to the primary and were considerably easier produced when the latter was very close to the glass, much more so than would be expected assuming the action to be electromagnetic and considering the distance; and these facts speak for an electrostatic effect.

In other experiments, I've noticed that when the primary touches the glass, the luminous circle is easier to produce and is[Pg 400] more clearly defined. However, in general, I haven't observed that the induced circles were very sharply defined, as Prof. J. J. Thomson noted; on the contrary, in my experiments, they were broad, and often the entire bulb or tube was illuminated. In one instance, I observed an intense purplish glow that Prof. J. J. Thomson refers to. But the circles were always very close to the primary and were significantly easier to produce when the primary was very close to the glass, much more than would be expected if the action were electromagnetic given the distance. These facts indicate an electrostatic effect.

Fig. 214. Fig. 214.
Fig. 215. Fig. 215.

Furthermore I have observed that there is a molecular bombardment in the plane of the luminous circle at right angles to the glass—supposing the circle to be in the plane of the primary[Pg 401]—this bombardment being evident from the rapid heating of the glass near the primary. Were the bombardment not at right angles to the glass the heating could not be so rapid. If there is a circumferential movement of the molecules constituting the luminous circle, I have thought that it might be rendered manifest by placing within the tube or bulb, radially to the circle, a thin plate of mica coated with some phosphorescent material and another such plate tangentially to the circle. If the molecules would move circumferentially, the former plate would be rendered more intensely phosphorescent. For want of time I have, however, not been able to perform the experiment.

Furthermore, I've noticed that there’s a molecular bombardment occurring in the plane of the bright circle perpendicular to the glass—assuming the circle is in the plane of the primary[Pg 401]—and this bombardment is clear from the quick heating of the glass near the primary. If the bombardment wasn't perpendicular to the glass, the heating wouldn’t be so fast. If there is a circular movement of the molecules in the bright circle, I thought it might be shown by placing a thin plate of mica coated with a phosphorescent material inside the tube or bulb, positioned radially to the circle, and another such plate tangentially to the circle. If the molecules move in a circular motion, the first plate would become more brightly phosphorescent. However, due to lack of time, I haven't been able to conduct the experiment.

Another observation made by me was that when the specific inductive capacity of the medium between the primary and secondary is increased, the inductive effect is augmented. This is roughly illustrated in Fig. 215. In this case luminosity was excited in an exhausted tube or bulb B and a glass tube T slipped between the primary and the bulb, when the effect pointed out was noted. Were the action wholly electromagnetic no change could possibly have been observed.

Another observation I made was that when the specific inductive capacity of the medium between the primary and secondary is increased, the inductive effect increases. This is roughly illustrated in Fig. 215. In this case, luminosity was excited in an exhausted tube or bulb B, and a glass tube T was placed between the primary and the bulb, which resulted in the noted effect. If the action were entirely electromagnetic, no change would have been observed.

I have likewise noted that when a bulb is surrounded by a wire closed upon itself and in the plane of the primary, the formation of the luminous circle within the bulb is not prevented. But if instead of the wire a broad strip of tinfoil is glued upon the bulb, the formation of the luminous band was prevented, because then the action was distributed over a greater surface. The effect of the closed tinfoil was no doubt of an electrostatic nature, for it presented a much greater resistance than the closed wire and produced therefore a much smaller electromagnetic effect.

I've also observed that when a bulb is surrounded by a wire that forms a closed loop in the same plane as the primary, the glowing circle inside the bulb still forms. However, if a wide piece of tinfoil is glued onto the bulb instead of the wire, the glowing band does not form, because the effect is spread over a larger surface area. The impact of the closed tinfoil was likely electrostatic, as it had much higher resistance than the closed wire and thus created a significantly weaker electromagnetic effect.

Some of the experiments of Prof. J. J. Thomson also would seem to show some electrostatic action. For instance, in the experiment with the bulb enclosed in a bell jar, I should think that when the latter is exhausted so far that the gas enclosed reaches the maximum conductivity, the formation of the circle in the bulb and jar is prevented because of the space surrounding the primary being highly conducting; when the jar is further exhausted, the conductivity of the space around the primary diminishes and the circles appear necessarily first in the bell jar, as the rarefied gas is nearer to the primary. But were the inductive effect very powerful, they would probably appear in the bulb also. If, however, the bell jar were exhausted to the highest degree they would very likely show themselves in the bulb[Pg 402] only, that is, supposing the vacuous space to be non-conducting. On the assumption that in these phenomena electrostatic actions are concerned we find it easily explicable why the introduction of mercury or the heating of the bulb prevents the formation of the luminous band or shortens the after-glow; and also why in some cases a platinum wire may prevent the excitation of the tube. Nevertheless some of the experiments of Prof. J. J. Thomson would seem to indicate an electromagnetic effect. I may add that in one of my experiments in which a vacuum was produced by the Torricellian method, I was unable to produce the luminous band, but this may have been due to the weak exciting current employed.

Some of Prof. J. J. Thomson's experiments also seem to show some electrostatic effects. For example, in the experiment with the bulb inside a bell jar, I believe that when the jar is pumped out enough that the gas inside reaches maximum conductivity, the formation of the circle in the bulb and jar is prevented because the space around the primary is highly conductive. When the jar is pumped out further, the conductivity of the space around the primary decreases, and the circles first appear in the bell jar, as the rarified gas is closer to the primary. However, if the inductive effect were really strong, they would likely also appear in the bulb. If the bell jar is evacuated to the greatest extent, they would probably show up only in the bulb, assuming that the empty space is non-conductive. Based on the idea that these phenomena involve electrostatic actions, it's easy to explain why adding mercury or heating the bulb stops the luminous band from forming or shortens the afterglow; and also why in some situations, a platinum wire can prevent the tube from being excited. Still, some of Prof. J. J. Thomson's experiments seem to suggest an electromagnetic effect. I should mention that in one of my experiments, where a vacuum was created using the Torricellian method, I couldn’t produce the luminous band, but that might have been due to the weak exciting current I used.[Pg 402]

My principal argument is the following: I have experimentally proved that if the same discharge which is barely sufficient to excite a luminous band in the bulb when passed through the primary circuit be so directed as to exalt the electrostatic inductive effect—namely, by converting upwards—an exhausted tube, devoid of electrodes, may be excited at a distance of several feet.

My main point is this: I have experimentally shown that if the same electrical discharge that is just enough to create a light band in the bulb when it flows through the primary circuit is directed to enhance the electrostatic inductive effect—specifically, by converting it upwards—an empty tube, without electrodes, can be activated from several feet away.


SOME EXPERIMENTS ON THE ELECTRIC DISCHARGE IN VACUUM TUBES.[9]
BY PROF. J. J. THOMSON, M.A., F.R.S.

The phenomena of vacuum discharges were, Prof. Thomson said, greatly simplified when their path was wholly gaseous, the complication of the dark space surrounding the negative electrode, and the stratifications so commonly observed in ordinary vacuum tubes, being absent. To produce discharges in tubes devoid of electrodes was, however, not easy to accomplish, for the only available means of producing an electromotive force in the discharge circuit was by electro-magnetic induction. Ordinary methods of producing variable induction were valueless, and recourse was had to the oscillatory discharge of a [Pg 403]Leyden jar, which combines the two essentials of a current whose maximum value is enormous, and whose rapidity of alternation is immensely great. The discharge circuits, which may take the shape of bulbs, or of tubes bent in the form of coils, were placed in close proximity to glass tubes filled with mercury, which formed the path of the oscillatory discharge. The parts thus corresponded to the windings of an induction coil, the vacuum tubes being the secondary, and the tubes filled with mercury the primary. In such an apparatus the Leyden jar need not be large, and neither primary nor secondary need have many turns, for this would increase the self-induction of the former, and lengthen the discharge path in the latter. Increasing the self-induction of the primary reduces the e. m. f. induced in the secondary, whilst lengthening the secondary does not increase the e. m. f. per unit length. The two or three turns, as shown in Fig. 216, in each, were found to be quite sufficient, and, on discharging the Leyden jar between two highly polished knobs in the primary circuit, a plain uniform band of light was seen to pass round the secondary. An exhausted bulb, Fig. 217, containing traces of oxygen was placed within a primary spiral of three turns, and, on passing the jar discharge, a circle of light was seen within the bulb in close proximity to the primary circuit, accompanied by a purplish glow, which lasted for a second or more. On heating the bulb, the duration of the glow was greatly diminished, and it could be instantly extinguished by the presence of an electro-magnet. Another exhausted bulb, Fig. 218, surrounded by a primary spiral, was contained in a bell-jar, and when the pressure of air in the jar was about that of the atmosphere, the secondary discharge occurred in the bulb, as is ordinarily the case. On exhausting the jar, however, the luminous discharge grew fainter, and a point was reached at which no secondary discharge was visible. Further exhaustion of the jar caused the secondary discharge to appear outside of the bulb. The fact of obtaining no luminous discharge, either in the bulb or jar, the author[Pg 404] could only explain on two suppositions, viz.: that under the conditions then existing the specific inductive capacity of the gas was very great, or that a discharge could pass without being luminous. The author had also observed that the conductivity of a vacuum tube without electrodes increased as the pressure diminished, until a certain point was reached, and afterwards diminished again, thus showing that the high resistance of a nearly perfect vacuum is in no way due to the presence of the electrodes. One peculiarity of the discharges was their local nature, the rings of light being much more sharply defined than was to be expected. They were also found to be most easily produced when the chain of molecules in the discharge were all of the same kind. For example, a discharge could be easily sent through a tube many feet long, but the introduction of a small pellet of mercury in the tube stopped the discharge, although the conductivity of the mercury was much greater than that of the vacuum. In some cases he had noticed that a very fine wire placed within a tube, on the side remote from the primary circuit, would prevent a luminous discharge in that tube.

The phenomenon of vacuum discharges, as Prof. Thomson explained, became much simpler when their path was entirely within a gas, removing the complications of the dark space around the negative electrode and the layering often seen in regular vacuum tubes. However, generating discharges in tubes without electrodes was not straightforward, as the only way to create an electromotive force in the discharge circuit was through electromagnetic induction. Standard methods for producing variable induction were ineffective, so they turned to the oscillatory discharge of a [Pg 403]Leyden jar, which provided the two key elements of a current with an extremely high maximum value and an incredibly rapid alternation rate. The discharge circuits, which could be shaped like bulbs or coils, were placed close to glass tubes filled with mercury, which served as the conduit for the oscillatory discharge. These components acted like the windings of an induction coil, with the vacuum tubes being the secondary and the mercury tubes the primary. In this setup, the Leyden jar didn’t have to be large, and neither the primary nor secondary needed many turns, as this would increase the self-induction of the primary and extend the discharge path in the secondary. Increasing the self-induction of the primary lowers the e.m.f. induced in the secondary, while making the secondary longer doesn’t boost the e.m.f. per unit length. The two or three turns shown in Fig. 216 in each were found to be quite sufficient, and when discharging the Leyden jar between two highly polished knobs in the primary circuit, a simple uniform band of light was seen to travel around the secondary. An exhausted bulb, Fig. 217, containing traces of oxygen was positioned within a primary spiral of three turns, and upon discharging the jar, a circle of light appeared inside the bulb, close to the primary circuit, accompanied by a purplish glow that lasted for a second or more. Heating the bulb significantly reduced the glow’s duration, which could be instantly extinguished by an electromagnet's presence. Another exhausted bulb, Fig. 218, surrounded by a primary spiral, was placed in a bell jar, and when the air pressure in the jar matched that of the atmosphere, the secondary discharge occurred in the bulb, as is typical. However, upon exhausting the jar, the luminous discharge faded, reaching a point where no secondary discharge was visible. Further evacuation of the jar caused the secondary discharge to appear outside the bulb. The author [Pg 404] could only explain the absence of a luminous discharge in both the bulb and the jar in two ways: either the specific inductive capacity of the gas was very high under those conditions, or a discharge could occur without being luminous. The author also noted that the conductivity of a vacuum tube without electrodes increased as pressure dropped until a certain point was reached, after which it declined again, indicating that the high resistance of a nearly perfect vacuum isn't due to the presence of electrodes. One unique aspect of the discharges was their local nature, with the rings of light being much more sharply defined than expected. They were also found to be easiest to produce when all the molecules in the discharge chain were of the same type. For instance, a discharge could easily flow through a tube several feet long, but introducing a small pellet of mercury into the tube halted the discharge, even though the conductivity of mercury was much higher than that of the vacuum. In some cases, it was observed that a very fine wire placed inside a tube, on the side far from the primary circuit, would prevent a luminous discharge in that tube.

Fig. 219 shows an exhausted secondary coil of one loop containing bulbs; the discharge passed along the inner side of the bulbs, the primary coils being placed within the secondary.

Fig. 219 shows a worn-out secondary coil of one loop with bulbs; the discharge traveled along the inner side of the bulbs, with the primary coils positioned inside the secondary.

Fig. 216, 217.
Fig. 216.Fig. 217.
Fig. 218, 219.
Fig. 218.Fig. 219.

[9]In The Electrical Engineer of August 12, I find some remarks of Prof. J. J. Thomson, which appeared originally in the London Electrician and which have a bearing upon some experiments described by me in your issue of July 1.

[9]In The Electrical Engineer from August 12, I came across some comments by Prof. J. J. Thomson that were originally published in the London Electrician, which relate to some experiments I discussed in your July 1 issue.

I did not, as Prof. J. J. Thomson seems to believe, misunderstand his position in regard to the cause of the phenomena considered, but I thought that in his experiments, as well as in my own, electrostatic effects were of great importance. It did not appear, from the meagre description of his experiments, that all possible precautions had been taken to exclude these effects. I did not doubt that luminosity could be excited in a closed tube when electrostatic action is completely excluded. In fact, at the outset, I myself looked for a purely electrodynamic effect and believed that I had obtained it. But many experiments performed at that time proved to me that the electrostatic effects were generally of far greater importance, and admitted of a more satisfactory explanation of most of the phenomena observed.

I didn’t misunderstand Professor J. J. Thomson’s perspective on the cause of the phenomena in question, as he seems to think. I believed that in both his experiments and mine, electrostatic effects played a significant role. It wasn’t clear from the limited description of his experiments that all possible measures had been taken to eliminate these effects. I had no doubt that luminosity could be triggered in a sealed tube when electrostatic influence was fully removed. In fact, initially, I searched for a purely electrodynamic effect and thought I had found one. However, many experiments I conducted at that time showed that electrostatic effects were usually much more significant and provided a more satisfactory explanation for most of the observed phenomena.

In using the term electrostatic I had reference rather to the nature of the action than to a stationary condition, which is the usual acceptance of the term. To express myself more clearly, I will suppose that near a closed exhausted tube be placed a small sphere charged to a very high potential. The sphere would act inductively upon the tube, and by distributing electricity over [Pg 405]the same would undoubtedly produce luminosity (if the potential be sufficiently high), until a permanent condition would be reached. Assuming the tube to be perfectly well insulated, there would be only one instantaneous flash during the act of distribution. This would be due to the electrostatic action simply.

In using the term electrostatic, I was talking more about how the action works rather than a stationary state, which is the common understanding of the term. To clarify, let’s imagine that a small sphere charged to a very high potential is placed near a closed, empty tube. The sphere would induce an effect on the tube, and by spreading electricity over [Pg 405], it would definitely create a glow (if the potential is high enough) until a stable condition is reached. If the tube is perfectly insulated, there would only be a single, instantaneous flash during the distribution process. This would solely be due to the electrostatic action.

But now, suppose the charged sphere to be moved at short intervals with great speed along the exhausted tube. The tube would now be permanently excited, as the moving sphere would cause a constant redistribution of electricity and collisions of the molecules of the rarefied gas. We would still have to deal with an electrostatic effect, and in addition an electrodynamic effect would be observed. But if it were found that, for instance, the effect produced depended more on the specific inductive capacity than on the magnetic permeability of the medium—which would certainly be the case for speeds incomparably lower than that of light—then I believe I would be justified in saying that the effect produced was more of an electrostatic nature. I do not mean to say, however, that any similar condition prevails in the case of the discharge of a Leyden jar through the primary, but I think that such an action would be desirable.

But now, let’s say the charged sphere is moved at short intervals with high speed along the evacuated tube. The tube would then become permanently energized, as the moving sphere would cause a constant rearrangement of electricity and collisions of the molecules in the thin gas. We would still see an electrostatic effect, and additionally, an electrodynamic effect would be observed. However, if it turned out that, for example, the effect observed relied more on the specific inductive capacity than on the magnetic permeability of the medium—which would definitely be the case for speeds much lower than that of light—then I think I could say that the effect was mainly electrostatic. I’m not suggesting, though, that a similar situation occurs with the discharge of a Leyden jar through the primary, but I believe that such an action would be beneficial.

It is in the spirit of the above example that I used the terms "more of an electrostatic nature," and have investigated the influence of bodies of high specific inductive capacity, and observed, for instance, the importance of the quality of glass of which the tube is made. I also endeavored to ascertain the influence of a medium of high permeability by using oxygen. It appeared from rough estimation that an oxygen tube when excited under similar conditions—that is, as far as could be determined—gives more light; but this, of course, may be due to many causes.

In line with the earlier example, I used the phrase "more of an electrostatic nature" and looked into how materials with high specific inductive capacity affect things. For example, I noticed how the type of glass used for the tube is important. I also tried to understand the effect of a medium with high permeability by using oxygen. From rough estimations, it seemed that an oxygen tube, when stimulated under similar conditions—as far as could be determined—produces more light; however, this could be attributed to various factors.

Without doubting in the least that, with the care and precautions taken by Prof. J. J. Thomson, the luminosity excited was due solely to electrodynamic action, I would say that in many experiments I have observed curious instances of the ineffectiveness of the screening, and I have also found that the electrification through the air is often of very great importance, and may, in some cases, determine the excitation of the tube.

Without a doubt, considering the precautions taken by Prof. J. J. Thomson, the light produced was entirely due to electrodynamic action. However, I've noticed many instances in various experiments where the screening was surprisingly ineffective. I've also found that the electricity in the air often plays a significant role and can, in some cases, be crucial for exciting the tube.

In his original communication to the Electrician, Prof. J. J. Thomson refers to the fact that the luminosity in a tube near a wire through which a Leyden jar was discharged was noted by Hittorf. I think that the feeble luminous effect referred to has[Pg 406] been noted by many experimenters, but in my experiments the effects were much more powerful than those usually noted.

In his original message to the Electrician, Prof. J. J. Thomson mentions that the brightness observed in a tube close to a wire when a Leyden jar was discharged was noted by Hittorf. I believe that the weak glowing effect he mentioned has[Pg 406] been observed by many researchers, but in my experiments, the effects were much stronger than what is typically reported.

The following is the communication[10] referred to:—

The following is the communication __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ mentioned:—


"Mr. Tesla seems to ascribe the effects he observed to electrostatic action, and I have no doubt, from the description he gives of his method of conducting his experiments, that in them electrostatic action plays a very important part. He seems, however, to have misunderstood my position with respect to the cause of these discharges, which is not, as he implies, that luminosity in tubes without electrodes cannot be produced by electrostatic action, but that it can also be produced when this action is excluded. As a matter of fact, it is very much easier to get the luminosity when these electrostatic effects are operative than when they are not. As an illustration of this I may mention that the first experiment I tried with the discharge of a Leyden jar produced luminosity in the tube, but it was not until after six weeks' continuous experimenting that I was able to get a discharge in the exhausted tube which I was satisfied was due to what is ordinarily called electrodynamic action. It is advisable to have a clear idea of what we mean by electrostatic action. If, previous to the discharge of the jar, the primary coil is raised to a high potential, it will induce over the glass of the tube a distribution of electricity. When the potential of the primary suddenly falls, this electrification will redistribute itself, and may pass through the rarefied gas and produce luminosity in doing so. Whilst the discharge of the jar is going on, it is difficult, and, from a theoretical point of view, undesirable, to separate the effect into parts, one of which is called electrostatic, the other electromagnetic; what we can prove is that in this case the discharge is not such as would be produced by electromotive forces derived from a potential function. In my experiments the primary coil was connected to earth, and, as a further precaution, the primary was separated from the discharge tube by a screen of blotting paper, moistened with dilute sulphuric acid, and connected to earth. Wet blotting paper is a sufficiently good conductor to screen off a stationary electrostatic effect, though it is not a good enough one to stop waves of alternating electromotive intensity. When showing the experiments to the Physical Society I could not, of course, keep the tubes covered up, but, unless my memory deceives me, I stated the precautions which had been taken against the electrostatic effect. To correct misapprehension I may state that I did not read a formal paper to the Society, my object being to exhibit a few of the most typical experiments. The account of the experiments in the Electrician was from a reporter's note, and was not written, or even read, by me. I have now almost finished writing out, and hope very shortly to publish, an account of these and a large number of allied experiments, including some analogous to those mentioned by Mr. Tesla on the effect of conductors placed near the discharge tube, which I find, in some cases, to produce a diminution, in others an increase, in the brightness of the discharge, as well as some on the effect of the presence of substances of large specific inductive capacity. These seem to me to admit of a satisfactory explanation, for which, however, I must refer to my paper."

"Mr. Tesla seems to attribute the effects he observed to electrostatic action, and I’m sure, based on his description of how he carried out his experiments, that electrostatic action plays a very significant role in them. However, he seems to have misunderstood my stance on the cause of these discharges. It’s not, as he suggests, that luminosity in tubes without electrodes can’t be produced by electrostatic action, but rather that it can also occur when that action is excluded. In fact, it's much easier to achieve luminosity when these electrostatic effects are present than when they aren't. To illustrate this point, the first experiment I conducted with the discharge of a Leyden jar produced luminosity in the tube, but it wasn't until after six weeks of continuous experimenting that I was satisfied I had obtained a discharge in the exhausted tube that was due to what is typically referred to as electrodynamic action. It's important to be clear about what we mean by electrostatic action. If, before discharging the jar, the primary coil is raised to a high potential, it will create a distribution of electricity across the glass of the tube. When the potential of the primary suddenly drops, this electrification will redistribute itself and can pass through the rarefied gas, producing luminosity in the process. While the discharge of the jar is happening, it's challenging, and from a theoretical standpoint, not ideal to separate the effects into parts, one labeled as electrostatic and the other as electromagnetic; what we can prove is that in this case, the discharge is not caused by electromotive forces derived from a potential function. In my experiments, the primary coil was grounded, and as an extra precaution, the primary was isolated from the discharge tube by a screen of blotting paper, moist with dilute sulfuric acid, and connected to ground. Wet blotting paper is a decent enough conductor to block off a stationary electrostatic effect, although it isn’t sufficient to stop waves of alternating electromotive intensity. While presenting the experiments to the Physical Society, I obviously couldn't keep the tubes covered, but unless my memory fails me, I mentioned the precautions taken against the electrostatic effect. To clarify any confusion, I want to state that I did not present a formal paper to the Society; my purpose was to showcase a few of the most typical experiments. The account of the experiments in the Electrician was from a reporter's notes and was not written or even read by me. I have almost finished writing up an account of these and many related experiments, including some similar to those mentioned by Mr. Tesla regarding the effect of conductors placed near the discharge tube, which I find, in some instances, decrease brightness, while in others, increase it, as well as some on the effect of materials with high specific inductive capacity. These observations seem to allow for a satisfactory explanation, for which, however, I must refer to my paper."


PART III.

MISCELLANEOUS INVENTIONS AND
WRITINGS.


CHAPTER XXXIII.

Method of Obtaining Direct Current from Alternating Currents.

This method consists in obtaining direct from alternating currents, or in directing the waves of an alternating current so as to produce direct or substantially direct currents by developing or producing in the branches of a circuit including a source of alternating currents, either permanently or periodically, and by electric, electro-magnetic, or magnetic agencies, manifestations of energy, or what may be termed active resistances of opposite electrical character, whereby the currents or current waves of opposite sign will be diverted through different circuits, those of one sign passing over one branch and those of opposite sign over the other.

This method involves getting direct current directly from alternating currents or directing the waves of an alternating current to create direct or nearly direct currents. This is done by developing or generating different energy manifestations or what might be called active resistances of opposite electrical types in the branches of a circuit that includes a source of alternating currents, either continuously or intermittently through electric, electromagnetic, or magnetic means. As a result, the currents or current waves of opposing signs will be channeled through separate circuits, with one type passing through one branch and the opposite type through another.

We may consider herein only the case of a circuit divided into two paths, inasmuch as any further subdivision involves merely an extension of the general principle. Selecting, then, any circuit through which is flowing an alternating current, Mr. Tesla divides such circuit at any desired point into two branches or paths. In one of these paths he inserts some device to create an electromotive force counter to the waves or impulses of current of one sign and a similar device in the other branch which opposes the waves of opposite sign. Assume, for example, that these devices are batteries, primary or secondary, or continuous current dynamo machines. The waves or impulses of opposite direction composing the main current have a natural tendency to divide between the two branches; but by reason of the opposite electrical character or effect of the two branches, one will offer an easy passage to a current of a certain direction, while the other will offer a relatively high resistance to the passage of the same current. The result of this disposition is, that the waves of current of one sign will, partly or wholly, pass over one of the paths or branches, while those of the opposite sign pass over the other. There may thus be obtained from an alternating current two or more direct currents without the employment of any commutator[Pg 410] such as it has been heretofore regarded as necessary to use. The current in either branch may be used in the same way and for the same purposes as any other direct current—that is, it may be made to charge secondary batteries, energize electro-magnets, or for any other analogous purpose.

We can focus here only on a circuit split into two paths, since any further division is just an extension of the overall principle. So, let's take any circuit carrying an alternating current, where Mr. Tesla splits the circuit at any preferred point into two branches or paths. In one of these paths, he places a device that generates an electromotive force opposing the waves or impulses of current of one type, and a similar device in the other path that counters the waves of the opposite type. For instance, these devices could be batteries, whether primary or secondary, or continuous current dynamo machines. The waves or impulses of opposite directions in the main current naturally tend to split between the two branches; however, due to the differing electrical characteristics or effects of the two branches, one will easily allow a current to flow in one direction, while the other will resist the same current more. The outcome of this setup is that the waves of current of one type will partly or completely flow through one path or branch, while those of the opposite type will go through the other. This way, you can get two or more direct currents from an alternating current without needing any commutator[Pg 410] that was previously thought to be necessary. The current in either branch can be used just like any other direct current—for charging secondary batteries, powering electro-magnets, or for similar uses.

Fig. 220 represents a plan of directing the alternating currents by means of devices purely electrical in character. Figs. 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, and 226 are diagrams illustrative of other ways of carrying out the invention.

Fig. 220 shows a plan for controlling alternating currents using entirely electrical devices. Figs. 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, and 226 are diagrams that illustrate other methods of implementing the invention.

Fig. 220. Fig. 220.

In Fig. 220, A designates a generator of alternating currents, and B B the main or line circuit therefrom. At any given point in this circuit at or near which it is desired to obtain direct currents, the circuit B is divided into two paths or branches C D. In each of these branches is placed an electrical generator, which for the present we will assume produces direct or continuous currents. The direction of the current thus produced is opposite in one branch to that of the current in the other branch, or, considering the two branches as forming a closed circuit, the generators E F are connected up in series therein, one generator in each part or half of the circuit. The electromotive force of the current sources E and F may be equal to or higher or lower than the electromotive forces in the branches C D, or between the points X and Y of the circuit B B. If equal, it is evident that current waves of one sign will be opposed in one branch and assisted in the other to such an extent that all the waves of one sign will pass over one branch and those of opposite sign over the other. If, on the other hand, the electromotive force of the sources E F be lower than that between X and Y, the currents in both branches will be alternating, but the waves of one sign will preponderate. One of the generators or sources of current E or F may be dispensed with; but it is preferable to employ both, if[Pg 411] they offer an appreciable resistance, as the two branches will be thereby better balanced. The translating or other devices to be acted upon by the current are designated by the letters G, and they are inserted in the branches C D in any desired manner; but in order to better preserve an even balance between the branches due regard should, of course, be had to the number and character of the devices.

In Fig. 220, A indicates an alternating current generator, and B B represents the main circuit coming from it. At any point in this circuit where we want to obtain direct currents, circuit B splits into two paths or branches C D. Each branch contains an electrical generator, which for now, we'll assume produces direct or continuous currents. The direction of the current produced in one branch is the opposite of the current in the other branch. If we think of the two branches as forming a closed circuit, the generators E F are connected in series, with one generator in each part of the circuit. The electromotive force of the current sources E and F can be equal to, higher, or lower than the electromotive forces in branches C D, or between points X and Y in circuit B B. If they are equal, current waves of one type will be opposed in one branch and supported in the other, resulting in all waves of one type moving through one branch and those of the opposite type through the other. If, however, the electromotive force of sources E F is lower than that between X and Y, the currents in both branches will alternate, but one type of wave will dominate. One of the current generators E or F can be removed; however, it's better to use both if[Pg 411] they present a noticeable resistance, as this will help balance the two branches better. The devices that will use the current are marked as G, and they are placed in the branches C D in any way desired; however, to maintain a good balance between the branches, attention should be paid to the number and type of devices.

Fig. 221. Fig. 221.

Figs. 221, 222, 223, and 224 illustrate what may termed "electro-magnetic" devices for accomplishing a similar result—that is to say, instead of producing directly by a generator an electromotive force in each branch of the circuit, Mr. Tesla establishes a field or fields of force and leads the branches through the same in such manner that an active opposition of opposite effect or direction will be developed therein by the passage, or tendency to pass, of the alternations of current. In Fig. 221, for example, A is the generator of alternating currents, B B the line circuit, and C D the branches over which the alternating currents are directed. In each branch is included the secondary of a transformer or induction coil, which, since they correspond in their functions to the batteries of the previous figure, are designated by the letters E F. The primaries H H' of the induction coils or transformers are connected either in parallel or series with a source of direct or continuous currents I, and the number of convolutions is so calculated for the strength of the current from I that the cores J J' will be saturated. The connections are such that the conditions in the two transformers are of opposite character—that is to say, the arrangement is such that a current wave or impulse corresponding in direction with that of the direct current in one primary, as H, is of opposite direction to that in the other primary H'. It thus results that while one secondary offers a resistance or op[Pg 412]position to the passage through it of a wave of one sign, the other secondary similarly opposes a wave of opposite sign. In consequence, the waves of one sign will, to a greater or less extent, pass by way of one branch, while those of opposite sign in like manner pass over the other branch.

Figs. 221, 222, 223, and 224 show what can be called "electromagnetic" devices to achieve a similar outcome. Instead of generating an electromotive force directly in each branch of the circuit with a generator, Mr. Tesla creates a field or fields of force and routes the branches through these fields in a way that generates an active opposition of opposite effects or directions as the alternating current flows through. In Fig. 221, for instance, A is the generator of alternating currents, B B is the line circuit, and C D shows the branches that carry the alternating currents. Each branch contains the secondary coil of a transformer or induction coil, which function similarly to the batteries from the previous figure, labeled as E F. The primary coils H H' of the transformers are connected either in parallel or series to a source of direct or continuous current I, and the number of turns is calculated for the strength of the current from I so that the cores J J' become saturated. The connections are made in such a way that the conditions in the two transformers are opposite; that is, the arrangement makes it so that a current wave in one primary, like H, flows in the same direction as the direct current, while in the other primary H', it flows in the opposite direction. Consequently, while one secondary offers resistance or opposition to a wave of one type, the other secondary similarly opposes a wave of the opposite type. As a result, waves of one type will pass through one branch to a greater or lesser extent, while those of the opposite type will similarly pass through the other branch.

In lieu of saturating the primaries by a source of continuous current, we may include the primaries in the branches C D, respectively, and periodically short-circuit by any suitable mechanical devices—such as an ordinary revolving commutator—their secondaries. It will be understood, of course, that the rotation and action of the commutator must be in synchronism or in proper accord with the periods of the alternations in order to secure the desired results. Such a disposition is represented diagrammatically in Fig. 222. Corresponding to the previous figures, A is the generator of alternating currents, B B the line, and C D the two branches for the direct currents. In branch C are included two primary coils E E', and in branch D are two similar primaries F F' The corresponding secondaries for these coils and which are on the same subdivided cores J or J', are in circuits the terminals of which connect to opposite segments K K', and L L', respectively, of a commutator. Brushes b b bear upon the commutator and alternately short-circuit the plates K and K', and L and L', through a connection c. It is obvious that either the magnets and commutator, or the brushes, may revolve.

Instead of continuously powering the primaries with a constant current, we can connect the primaries in branches C D, respectively, and periodically short-circuit their secondaries with any suitable mechanical devices—like a standard rotating commutator. It's important to note that the rotation and functioning of the commutator must synchronize with the timing of the alternating currents to achieve the desired outcomes. This setup is illustrated in Fig. 222. As seen in the previous figures, A is the alternating current generator, B B represents the line, and C D are the two branches for direct currents. In branch C, there are two primary coils E E', and in branch D, there are two similar primaries F F'. The corresponding secondaries for these coils, located on the same subdivided cores J or J', are in circuits whose terminals connect to opposite segments K K' and L L', respectively, of a commutator. Brushes b b make contact with the commutator and alternately short-circuit the plates K and K', and L and L', through a connection c. It's clear that either the magnets and commutator can rotate, or the brushes can move.

Fig. 222. Fig. 222.

The operation will be understood from a consideration of the effects of closing or short-circuiting the secondaries. For example, if at the instant when a given wave of current passes, one[Pg 413] set of secondaries be short-circuited, nearly all the current flows through the corresponding primaries; but the secondaries of the other branch being open-circuited, the self-induction in the primaries is highest, and hence little or no current will pass through that branch. If, as the current alternates, the secondaries of the two branches are alternately short-circuited, the result will be that the currents of one sign pass over one branch and those of the opposite sign over the other. The disadvantages of this arrangement, which would seem to result from the employment of sliding contacts, are in reality very slight, inasmuch as the electromotive force of the secondaries may be made exceedingly low, so that sparking at the brushes is avoided.

The operation can be understood by looking at what happens when the secondaries are closed or short-circuited. For instance, when a wave of current passes through, if one set of secondaries is short-circuited, almost all the current will flow through the corresponding primaries. However, since the secondaries of the other branch are open-circuited, the self-induction in the primaries is at its peak, which means that little to no current will pass through that branch. As the current alternates, if the secondaries of both branches are alternately short-circuited, then the currents of one polarity will travel through one branch while the currents of the opposite polarity will flow through the other. The drawbacks of this setup, which might seem to arise from using sliding contacts, are actually quite minimal since the electromotive force of the secondaries can be made very low, thus preventing sparking at the brushes.

Fig. 223. Fig. 223.

Fig. 223 is a diagram, partly in section, of another plan of carrying out the invention. The circuit B in this case is divided, as before, and each branch includes the coils of both the fields and revolving armatures of two induction devices. The armatures O P are preferably mounted on the same shaft, and are adjusted relatively to one another in such manner that when the self-induction in one branch, as C, is maximum, in the other branch D it is minimum. The armatures are rotated in synchronism with the alternations from the source A. The winding or position of the armature coils is such that a current in a given direction passed through both armatures would establish in one, poles similar to those in the adjacent poles of the field, and in the other, poles unlike the adjacent field poles, as indicated by n n s s in the diagram. If the like poles are presented, as shown in circuit D, the condition is that of a closed secondary upon a primary, or the position of least inductive resistance; hence a given alternation of current will pass mainly through D. A half revolution of the armatures produces an opposite effect and the succeeding[Pg 414] current impulse passes through C. Using this figure as an illustration, it is evident that the fields N M may be permanent magnets or independently excited and the armatures O P driven, as in the present case, so as to produce alternate currents, which will set up alternately impulses of opposite direction in the two branches D C, which in such case would include the armature circuits and translating devices only.

Fig. 223 is a diagram, partly in section, of another plan for implementing the invention. In this case, circuit B is divided, as before, and each branch contains the coils of both the fields and rotating armatures of two induction devices. The armatures O P are ideally mounted on the same shaft and are positioned relative to one another so that when self-induction in one branch, like C, is at its maximum, in the other branch D it is at its minimum. The armatures rotate in sync with the changes from the source A. The winding or position of the armature coils is set up so that if a current flows in a certain direction through both armatures, it would create poles in one that are similar to those in the nearby poles of the field, and in the other, poles that are unlike the adjacent field poles, as indicated by n n s s in the diagram. If like poles are aligned, as shown in circuit D, the situation is one of a closed secondary on a primary, or the position of least inductive resistance; thus, a given current alternation will primarily flow through D. A half rotation of the armatures creates the opposite effect, and the next current impulse will flow through C. Using this figure as an example, it’s clear that fields N M can either be permanent magnets or independently excited, and the armatures O P can be driven, as in this case, to produce alternating currents, which will alternately create impulses of opposite direction in the two branches D C, which in this scenario would include just the armature circuits and translating devices.

In Fig. 224 a plan alternative with that shown in Fig. 222 is illustrated. In the previous case illustrated, each branch C and D contained one or more primary coils, the secondaries of which were periodically short circuited in synchronism with the alternations of current from the main source A, and for this purpose a commutator was employed. The latter may, however, be dispensed with and an armature with a closed coil substituted.

In Fig. 224, an alternative plan to what is shown in Fig. 222 is illustrated. In the previous example, each branch C and D had one or more primary coils, the secondaries of which were periodically short-circuited in sync with the current alternations from the main source A, and a commutator was used for this purpose. However, the commutator can be omitted, and an armature with a closed coil can be used instead.

Fig. 224. Fig. 224.

Referring to Fig. 224 in one of the branches, as C, are two coils M', wound on laminated cores, and in the other branches D are similar coils N'. A subdivided or laminated armature O', carrying a closed coil R', is rotatably supported between the coils M' N', as shown. In the position shown—that is, with the coil R' parallel with the convolutions of the primaries N' M'—practically the whole current will pass through branch D, because the self-induction in coils M' M' is maximum. If, therefore, the armature and coil be rotated at a proper speed relatively to the periods or alternations of the source A, the same results are obtained as in the case of Fig. 222.

Referring to Fig. 224, in one of the branches, labeled C, there are two coils M' wound on laminated cores, and in the other branches D, there are similar coils N'. A subdivided or laminated armature O', which holds a closed coil R', is supported between the coils M' N' in a way that allows it to rotate, as shown. In the position depicted—where the coil R' is parallel to the windings of the primary coils N' M'—almost the entire current will flow through branch D because the self-induction in coils M' M' is at its maximum. Therefore, if the armature and coil are rotated at the correct speed relative to the cycles or changes of source A, the same outcomes are achieved as in the scenario shown in Fig. 222.

Fig. 225 is an instance of what may be called, in distinction to the others, a "magnetic" means of securing the result. V and W are two strong permanent magnets provided with armatures V' W', respectively. The armatures are made of thin laminæ of soft iron or steel, and the amount of magnetic metal which they[Pg 415] contain is so calculated that they will be fully or nearly saturated by the magnets. Around the armatures are coils E F, contained, respectively, in the circuits C and D. The connections and electrical conditions in this case are similar to those in Fig. 221, except that the current source of I, Fig. 221, is dispensed with and the saturation of the core of coils E F obtained from the permanent magnets.

Fig. 225 shows an example of what can be called, in contrast to the others, a "magnetic" method for achieving the result. V and W are two strong permanent magnets equipped with armatures V' W', respectively. The armatures are made from thin layers of soft iron or steel, and the amount of magnetic material they contain is calculated in such a way that they will be fully or almost saturated by the magnets. Surrounding the armatures are coils E F, which are part of circuits C and D. The connections and electrical conditions in this case are similar to those in Fig. 221, except that the current source I from Fig. 221 is not used and the saturation of the core of coils E F is achieved through the permanent magnets.

Fig. 225. Fig. 225.

The previous illustrations have all shown the two branches or paths containing the translating or induction devices as in derivation one to the other; but this is not always necessary. For example, in Fig. 226, A is an alternating-current generator; B B, the line wires or circuit. At any given point in the circuit let us form two paths, as D D', and at another point two paths, as C C'. Either pair or group of paths is similar to the previous dispositions with the electrical source or induction device in one branch only, while the two groups taken together form the obvious equivalent of the cases in which an induction device or generator is included in both branches. In one of the paths, as D, are included the devices to be operated by the current. In the other branch, as D', is an induction device that opposes the current impulses of one direction and directs them through the branch D. So, also, in branch C are translating devices G, and in branch C' an induction device or its equivalent that diverts through C impulses of opposite direction to those diverted by the device in branch D'. The diagram shows a special form of induction device for this purpose. J J' are the cores, formed with pole-pieces, upon which are wound the coils M N. Between these pole-pieces are mounted at right angles to one another the magnetic armatures O P, preferably mounted on the same shaft and[Pg 416] designed to be rotated in synchronism with the alternations of current. When one of the armatures is in line with the poles or in the position occupied by armature P, the magnetic circuit of the induction device is practically closed; hence there will be the greatest opposition to the passage of a current through coils N N. The alternation will therefore pass by way of branch D. At the same time, the magnetic circuit of the other induction device being broken by the position of the armature O, there will be less opposition to the current in coils M, which will shunt the current from branch C. A reversal of the current being attended by a shifting of the armatures, the opposite effect is produced.

The previous illustrations have all shown the two branches or paths containing the translating or induction devices as one deriving from the other; but this isn't always necessary. For example, in Fig. 226, A is an alternating-current generator; B B are the line wires or circuit. At any point in the circuit, let’s create two paths, as D D', and at another point, two paths, as C C'. Either pair or group of paths is similar to the earlier arrangements, with the electrical source or induction device in just one branch, while both groups together represent the equivalent of situations where an induction device or generator is present in both branches. In one of the paths, like D, are the devices that will run on the current. In the other branch, D', an induction device opposes the current impulses in one direction and channels them through branch D. Similarly, branch C has translating devices G, and in branch C', there's an induction device or a similar component that redirects impulses of the opposite direction to those diverted by the device in branch D'. The diagram illustrates a specific type of induction device for this setup. J J' are the cores, built with pole pieces, around which are wound the coils M N. Between these pole pieces are mounted, at right angles to each other, the magnetic armatures O P, ideally mounted on the same shaft and designed to rotate in sync with the current alternations. When one of the armatures is aligned with the poles or in the position of armature P, the magnetic circuit of the induction device is almost closed; thus, there will be significant opposition to the current flowing through coils N N. The alternation will, therefore, go through branch D. At the same time, the magnetic circuit of the other induction device being interrupted by the position of armature O, there will be lower opposition to the current in coils M, which will divert the current from branch C. When the current reverses, and the armatures shift, the opposite effect happens.

Fig. 226. Fig. 226.

Other modifications of these methods are possible, but need not be pointed out. In all these plans, it will be observed, there is developed in one or all of these branches of a circuit from a source of alternating currents, an active (as distinguished from a dead) resistance or opposition to the currents of one sign, for the purpose of diverting the currents of that sign through the other or another path, but permitting the currents of opposite sign to pass without substantial opposition.

Other changes to these methods are possible, but there's no need to mention them. In all these plans, you'll notice that one or more branches of a circuit from a source of alternating currents create an active (as opposed to a dead) resistance or opposition to the currents of one polarity. This is done to redirect the currents of that polarity through a different path, while allowing the currents of the opposite polarity to pass through with little to no resistance.

Whether the division of the currents or waves of current of opposite sign be effected with absolute precision or not is immaterial, since it will be sufficient if the waves are only partially diverted or directed, for in such case the preponderating influence in each branch of the circuit of the waves of one sign secures the same practical results in many if not all respects as though the current were direct and continuous.[Pg 417]

Whether the separation of currents or waves of opposite polarity happens with complete accuracy or not doesn't really matter; it's enough if the waves are just partially redirected. In that case, the dominant effect in each part of the circuit from the waves of one polarity achieves the same practical outcomes in many, if not all, ways as if the current were steady and continuous.[Pg 417]

An alternating and a direct current have been combined so that the waves of one direction or sign were partially or wholly overcome by the direct current; but by this plan only one set of alternations are utilized, whereas by the system just described the entire current is rendered available. By obvious applications of this discovery Mr. Tesla is enabled to produce a self-exciting alternating dynamo, or to operate direct current meters on alternating-current circuits or to run various devices—such as arc lamps—by direct currents in the same circuit with incandescent lamps or other devices operated by alternating currents.

An alternating current and a direct current have been combined so that the waves of one direction or polarity are partially or completely neutralized by the direct current. However, this method only uses one set of alternations, while the system previously described makes the entire current usable. With this discovery, Mr. Tesla can create a self-exciting alternating dynamo, operate direct current meters on alternating current circuits, or run various devices—like arc lamps—using direct currents in the same circuit with incandescent lamps or other devices powered by alternating currents.

It will be observed that if an intermittent counter or opposing force be developed in the branches of the circuit and of higher electromotive force than that of the generator, an alternating current will result in each branch, with the waves of one sign preponderating, while a constantly or uniformly acting opposition in the branches of higher electromotive force than the generator would produce a pulsating current, which conditions would be, under some circumstances, the equivalent of those described.

It can be seen that if an intermittent counter or opposing force is created in the branches of the circuit and has a higher electromotive force than the generator, an alternating current will occur in each branch, with one type of wave being more dominant. On the other hand, if there is a constant or uniform opposition in the branches with a higher electromotive force than the generator, it would lead to a pulsating current. Depending on the circumstances, these conditions could be equivalent to those previously described.


CHAPTER XXXIV.

Plate Oil Condensers.

In experimenting with currents of high frequency and high potential, Mr. Tesla has found that insulating materials such as glass, mica, and in general those bodies which possess the highest specific inductive capacity, are inferior as insulators in such devices when currents of the kind described are employed compared with those possessing high insulating power, together with a smaller specific inductive capacity; and he has also found that it is very desirable to exclude all gaseous matter from the apparatus, or any access of the same to the electrified surfaces, in order to prevent heating by molecular bombardment and the loss or injury consequent thereon. He has therefore devised a method to accomplish these results and produce highly efficient and reliable condensers, by using oil as the dielectric[11]. The plan admits of a particular con[Pg 419]struction of condenser, in which the distance between the plates is adjustable, and of which he takes advantage.

In his experiments with high-frequency and high-voltage currents, Mr. Tesla discovered that insulating materials like glass, mica, and generally those with the highest specific inductive capacity are less effective as insulators in this type of equipment compared to materials that have strong insulating abilities but lower specific inductive capacity. He also found it crucial to eliminate any gaseous substances from the apparatus or prevent them from reaching the electrified surfaces to avoid heating from molecular bombardment, which can cause loss or damage. To achieve these results and create highly efficient and reliable capacitors, he developed a method that uses oil as the dielectric[11]. This method allows for a specific construction of the capacitor where the distance between the plates can be adjusted, which he takes advantage of.

Fig. 227. Fig. 227.
Fig. 228. Fig. 228.

In the accompanying illustrations, Fig. 227 is a section of a condenser constructed in accordance with this principle and having stationary plates; and Fig. 228 is a similar view of a condenser with adjustable plates.

In the accompanying illustrations, Fig. 227 shows a section of a condenser built based on this principle, featuring stationary plates; and Fig. 228 provides a similar view of a condenser with adjustable plates.

Any suitable box or receptacle A may be used to contain the plates or armatures. These latter are designated by B and C and are connected, respectively, to terminals D and E, which pass out through the sides of the case. The plates ordinarily are separated by strips of porous insulating material F, which are used merely for the purpose of maintaining them in position. The space within the can is filled with oil G. Such a condenser will prove highly efficient and will not become heated or permanently injured.

Any suitable box or container A can be used to hold the plates or armatures. These are labeled as B and C and are connected to terminals D and E, which extend out through the sides of the case. The plates are usually kept apart by strips of porous insulating material F, which are only meant to keep them in place. The inside of the can is filled with oil G. This kind of condenser will be very efficient and won’t overheat or get permanently damaged.

In many cases it is desirable to vary or adjust the capacity of a condenser, and this is provided for by securing the plates to adjustable supports—as, for example, to rods H—passing through stuffing boxes K in the sides of case A and furnished with nuts L, the ends of the rods being threaded for engagement with the nuts.

In many cases, it's useful to change or adjust the capacity of a condenser. This can be done by attaching the plates to adjustable supports—like rods H—that go through stuffing boxes K on the sides of case A and are equipped with nuts L. The ends of the rods are threaded to connect with the nuts.

It is well known that oils possess insulating properties, and it has been a common practice to interpose a body of oil between two conductors for purposes of insulation; but Mr. Tesla believes he has discovered peculiar properties in oils which render them very valuable in this particular form of device.

It’s widely recognized that oils have insulating properties, and it’s been a common practice to place a layer of oil between two conductors for insulation purposes. However, Mr. Tesla believes he has found unique properties in oils that make them particularly valuable in this type of device.


CHAPTER XXXV.

Smart Energy Meter.

An ingenious form of electrolytic meter attributable to Mr. Tesla is one in which a conductor is immersed in a solution, so arranged that metal may be deposited from the solution or taken away in such a manner that the electrical resistance of the conductor is varied in a definite proportion to the strength of the current the energy of which is to be computed, whereby this variation in resistance serves as a measure of the energy and also may actuate registering mechanism, whenever the resistance rises above or falls below certain limits.

A clever type of electrolytic meter designed by Mr. Tesla features a conductor placed in a solution, set up so that metal can either be deposited from the solution or removed in a way that changes the electrical resistance of the conductor in direct relation to the strength of the current being measured. This change in resistance acts as a measure of the energy and can also trigger a recording mechanism whenever the resistance goes above or below specific thresholds.

In carrying out this idea Mr. Tesla employs an electrolytic cell, through which extend two conductors parallel and in close proximity to each other. These conductors he connects in series through a resistance, but in such manner that there is an equal difference of potential between them throughout their entire extent. The free ends or terminals of the conductors are connected either in series in the circuit supplying the current to the lamps or other devices, or in parallel to a resistance in the circuit and in series with the current consuming devices. Under such circumstances a current passing through the conductors establishes a difference of potential between them which is proportional to the strength of the current, in consequence of which there is a leakage of current from one conductor to the other across the solution. The strength of this leakage current is proportional to the difference of potential, and, therefore, in proportion to the strength of the current passing through the conductors. Moreover, as there is a constant difference of potential between the two conductors throughout the entire extent that is exposed to the solution, the current density through such solution is the same at all corresponding points, and hence the deposit is uniform along the whole of one of the conductors, while the metal is taken away uniformly from the other. The resistance of one conductor is by this means diminished, while that of the other is[Pg 421] increased, both in proportion to the strength of the current passing through the conductors. From such variation in the resistance of either or both of the conductors forming the positive and negative electrodes of the cell, the current energy expended may be readily computed. Figs. 229 and 230 illustrate two forms of such a meter.

In implementing this idea, Mr. Tesla uses an electrolytic cell, which has two conductors running parallel and close to each other. He connects these conductors in series through a resistor, ensuring there is an equal potential difference between them across their entire length. The free ends or terminals of the conductors are connected either in series with the circuit providing current to the lamps or other devices, or in parallel with a resistor in the circuit, and in series with the devices consuming current. In this setup, when a current flows through the conductors, it creates a potential difference between them that is proportional to the current strength. As a result, current leaks from one conductor to the other across the solution. The strength of this leakage current is proportional to the potential difference and, therefore, also relates to the current passing through the conductors. Furthermore, since there is a constant potential difference between the two conductors throughout the part that is exposed to the solution, the current density in the solution remains the same at all corresponding points, leading to a uniform deposit on one conductor while the other conductor uniformly loses metal. This process reduces the resistance of one conductor while increasing that of the other, both in proportion to the strength of the current flowing through them. By observing changes in the resistance of either or both conductors that act as the positive and negative electrodes of the cell, one can easily calculate the current energy used. Figs. 229 and 230 illustrate two types of such a meter.

Fig. 229. Fig. 229.

In Fig. 229 G designates a direct-current generator. L L are the conductors of the circuit extending therefrom. A is a tube of glass, the ends of which are sealed, as by means of insulating plugs or caps B B. C C' are two conductors extending through the tube A, their ends passing out through the plugs B to terminals thereon. These conductors may be corrugated or formed in other proper ways to offer the desired electrical resistance. R is a resistance connected in series with the two conductors C C', which by their free terminals are connected up in circuit with one of the conductors L.

In Fig. 229, G represents a direct-current generator. L L are the circuit conductors extending from it. A is a sealed glass tube, with the ends sealed using insulating plugs or caps B B. C C' are two conductors that run through the glass tube A, with their ends exiting through the plugs B to reach the terminals. These conductors can be corrugated or shaped in other suitable ways to provide the required electrical resistance. R is a resistor connected in series with the two conductors C C', which connect through their free terminals to one of the conductors L in the circuit.

The method of using this device and computing by means thereof the energy of the current will be readily understood. First, the resistances of the two conductors C C', respectively, are accurately measured and noted. Then a known current is passed through the instrument for a given time, and by a second measurement the increase and diminution of the resistances of the two conductors are respectively taken. From these data the constant is[Pg 422] obtained—that is to say, for example, the increase of resistance of one conductor or the diminution of the resistance of the other per lamp hour. These two measurements evidently serve as a check, since the gain of one conductor should equal the loss of the other. A further check is afforded by measuring both wires in series with the resistance, in which case the resistance of the whole should remain constant.

The way to use this device and calculate the energy of the current is pretty straightforward. First, measure and record the resistances of the two conductors C C'. Then, send a known current through the instrument for a set amount of time, and take a second measurement to determine the increase and decrease in the resistances of the two conductors. From this information, the constant is[Pg 422] obtained—that is, for example, the increase in resistance of one conductor or the decrease in resistance of the other per lamp hour. These two measurements clearly serve as a check since the gain in one conductor should equal the loss in the other. An additional check is possible by measuring both wires in series with the resistance, in which case the total resistance should stay constant.

Fig. 230. Fig. 230.

In Fig. 230 the conductors C C' are connected in parallel, the current device at X passing in one branch first through a resistance R' and then through conductor C, while on the other branch it passes first through conductor C', and then through resistance R''. The resistances R' R'' are equal, as also are the resistances of the conductors C C'. It is, moreover, preferable that the respective resistances of the conductors C C' should be a known and convenient fraction of the coils or resistances R' R''. It will be observed that in the arrangement shown in Fig. 230 there is a constant potential difference between the two conductors C C' throughout their entire length.

In Fig. 230, the conductors C C' are connected in parallel. The current at X first flows through a resistance R' in one branch, then through conductor C, while in the other branch, it first goes through conductor C', and then through resistance R''. The resistances R' R'' are equal, as are the resistances of the conductors C C'. Additionally, it's best for the resistances of the conductors C C' to be a known and convenient fraction of the coils or resistances R' R''. It should be noted that in the setup shown in Fig. 230, there is a constant potential difference between the two conductors C C' along their entire length.

It will be seen that in both cases illustrated, the proportionality of the increase or decrease of resistance to the current strength will always be preserved, for what one conductor gains the other loses, and the resistances of the conductors C C' being small as[Pg 423] compared with the resistances in series with them. It will be understood that after each measurement or registration of a given variation of resistance in one or both conductors, the direction of the current should be changed or the instrument reversed, so that the deposit will be taken from the conductor which has gained and added to that which has lost. This principle is capable of many modifications. For instance, since there is a section of the circuit—to wit, the conductor C or C'—that varies in resistance in proportion to the current strength, such variation may be utilized, as is done in many analogous cases, to effect the operation of various automatic devices, such as registers. It is better, however, for the sake of simplicity to compute the energy by measurements of resistance.

It will be clear that in both cases illustrated, the proportionality of the increase or decrease of resistance in relation to current strength will always be maintained, because what one conductor gains, the other loses. The resistances of the conductors C C' are small as[Pg 423] compared to the resistances in series with them. After each measurement or recording of a specific change in resistance in one or both conductors, the direction of the current should be switched or the instrument flipped. This way, the deposit will be taken from the conductor that has gained and added to the one that has lost. This principle can be modified in many ways. For example, since there’s a section of the circuit—specifically, conductor C or C'—that changes in resistance according to the current strength, such variation can be used, as is done in many similar cases, to operate various automatic devices, like registers. However, for simplicity, it's better to calculate energy through resistance measurements.

The chief advantages of this arrangement are, first, that it is possible to read off directly the amount of the energy expended by means of a properly constructed ohm-meter and without resorting to weighing the deposit; secondly it is not necessary to employ shunts, for the whole of the current to be measured may be passed through the instrument; third, the accuracy of the instrument and correctness of the indications are but slightly affected by changes in temperature. It is also said that such meters have the merit of superior economy and compactness, as well as of cheapness in construction. Electrolytic meters seem to need every auxiliary advantage to make them permanently popular and successful, no matter how much ingenuity may be shown in their design.

The main benefits of this setup are, first, that it's possible to directly read the amount of energy used with a well-made ohm-meter without having to weigh the deposit; second, there’s no need to use shunts since all the current to be measured can flow through the instrument; third, the accuracy of the instrument and the reliability of the readings are only slightly affected by temperature changes. It’s also noted that these meters are more economical, compact, and inexpensive to make. Electrolytic meters seem to require all the extra advantages they can get to remain popular and successful, regardless of how creative their design is.


CHAPTER XXXVI.

Thermo-Magnetic Motors and Pyro-Magnetic Generators.

No electrical inventor of the present day dealing with the problems of light and power considers that he has done himself or his opportunities justice until he has attacked the subject of thermo-magnetism. As far back as the beginning of the seventeenth century it was shown by Dr. William Gilbert, the father of modern electricity, that a loadstone or iron bar when heated to redness loses its magnetism; and since that time the influence of heat on the magnetic metals has been investigated frequently, though not with any material or practical result.

No electrical inventor today working on light and power believes they’ve done their best or fully seized their opportunities until they’ve tackled thermo-magnetism. As far back as the early seventeenth century, Dr. William Gilbert, the father of modern electricity, demonstrated that a lodestone or iron bar loses its magnetism when heated to a red glow. Since then, the effect of heat on magnetic metals has been examined many times, but without any significant or practical outcomes.

For a man of Mr. Tesla's inventive ability, the problems in this field have naturally had no small fascination, and though he has but glanced at them, it is to be hoped he may find time to pursue the study deeper and further. For such as he, the investigation must undoubtedly bear fruit. Meanwhile he has worked out one or two operative devices worthy of note.[12] He obtains mechanical power by a reciprocating action resulting from the joint operations of heat, magnetism, and a spring or weight or other force—that is to say he subjects a body magnetized by induction or otherwise to the action of heat until the magnetism is sufficiently neutralized to allow a weight or spring to give motion to the body and lessen the action of the heat, so that the magnetism may be sufficiently restored to move the [Pg 425]body in the opposite direction, and again subject the same to the demagnetizing power of the heat.

For someone like Mr. Tesla, who has such a knack for invention, the challenges in this area have certainly been intriguing. Even though he's only briefly looked into them, we can hope he finds time to study them more in-depth. For someone of his caliber, this investigation is bound to yield results. In the meantime, he has developed a couple of noteworthy devices. He harnesses mechanical power through a back-and-forth motion created by the combined effects of heat, magnetism, and a spring or weight, or any other force. In simpler terms, he exposes a body that’s magnetized by induction or other methods to heat until the magnetism is reduced enough to let a weight or spring move the body. This process diminishes the heat effect, allowing the magnetism to be sufficiently restored to push the body in the opposite direction, and then once again expose it to the heat that demagnetizes it.

Use is made of either an electro-magnet or a permanent magnet, and the heat is directed against a body that is magnetized by induction, rather than directly against a permanent magnet, thereby avoiding the loss of magnetism that might result in the permanent magnet by the action of heat. Mr. Tesla also provides for lessening the volume of the heat or for intercepting the same during that portion of the reciprocation in which the cooling action takes place.

An electro-magnet or a permanent magnet is used, and the heat is directed toward a body that is magnetized by induction, rather than straight onto a permanent magnet. This approach prevents the permanent magnet from losing magnetism due to heat exposure. Mr. Tesla also includes a method to reduce the amount of heat or to block it during the part of the cycle where cooling occurs.

In the diagrams are shown some of the numerous arrangements that may be made use of in carrying out this idea. In all of these figures the magnet-poles are marked N S, the armature A, the Bunsen burner or other source of heat H, the axis of motion M, and the spring or the equivalent thereof—namely, a weight—is marked W.

In the diagrams, you can see some of the many designs that can be used to implement this idea. In all of these figures, the magnet poles are labeled N S, the armature is labeled A, the Bunsen burner or other heat source is labeled H, the axis of movement is labeled M, and the spring or its equivalent—a weight—is labeled W.

Fig. 232, 231, 233.
Fig. 232.Fig. 231.Fig. 233.

In Fig. 231 the permanent magnet N is connected with a frame, F, supporting the axis M, from which the arm P hangs, and at the lower end of which the armature A is supported. The stops 2 and 3 limit the extent of motion, and the spring W tends to draw the armature A away from the magnet N. It will now be understood that the magnetism of N is sufficient to overcome the spring W and draw the armature A toward the magnet N. The heat acting upon the armature A neutralizes its induced magnetism sufficiently for the spring W to draw the armature A away from the magnet N and also from the heat at H. The armature now cools, and the attraction of the magnet N overcomes the spring W and draws the armature A back again above the burner[Pg 426] H, so that the same is again heated and the operations are repeated. The reciprocating movements thus obtained are employed as a source of mechanical power in any desired manner. Usually a connecting-rod to a crank upon a fly-wheel shaft would be made use of, as indicated in Fig. 240.

In Fig. 231, the permanent magnet N is attached to a frame F that holds the axis M. From this axis, the arm P hangs, and at its lower end, the armature A is supported. The stops 2 and 3 limit how far it can move, and the spring W pulls the armature A away from the magnet N. It’s clear now that the magnetism of N is strong enough to overcome the spring W and pull the armature A toward it. The heat affecting the armature A weakens its induced magnetism enough for the spring W to pull the armature away from the magnet N and from the heat at H. The armature then cools down, and the magnet N's pull is stronger than the spring W, pulling the armature A back above the burner H, heating it again and repeating the process. The resulting back-and-forth movements can be used to generate mechanical power in various ways. Typically, a connecting rod to a crank on a flywheel shaft is used, as shown in Fig. 240.

Fig. 234, 236, 235.
Fig. 234.Fig. 236.Fig. 235.

Fig. 232 represents the same parts as before described; but an electro-magnet is illustrated in place of a permanent magnet. The operations, however, are the same.

Fig. 232 shows the same components as previously described; however, it features an electromagnet instead of a permanent magnet. The operations, though, remain the same.

In Fig. 233 are shown the same parts as in Figs. 231 and 232, but they are differently arranged. The armature A, instead of swinging, is stationary and held by arm P', and the core N S of the electro-magnet is made to swing within the helix Q, the core being suspended by the arm P from the pivot M. A shield, R, is connected with the magnet-core and swings with it, so that after the heat has demagnetized the armature A to such an extent that the spring W draws the core N S away from the armature A, the shield R comes between the flame H and armature A, thereby intercepting the action of the heat and allowing the armature to cool, so that the magnetism, again preponderating, causes the movement of the core N S toward the armature A and the removal of the shield R from above the flame, so that the heat again acts to lessen or neutralize the magnetism. A rotary or other movement may be obtained from this reciprocation.

In Fig. 233, the same components as in Figs. 231 and 232 are displayed, but they are arranged differently. The armature A is stationary and held by arm P', while the core N S of the electromagnet swings within the helix Q, suspended by arm P from the pivot M. A shield, R, is attached to the magnet core and moves with it, so that once the heat has demagnetized the armature A enough for the spring W to pull the core N S away from the armature A, the shield R blocks the flame H from the armature A, intercepting the heat and allowing the armature to cool. As the magnetism recovers, it causes the core N S to move back toward the armature A and the shield R to clear the flame, allowing the heat to once again reduce or neutralize the magnetism. This back-and-forth movement can produce a rotary or other type of motion.

Fig. 234 corresponds in every respect with Fig. 233, except that a permanent horseshoe-magnet, N S is represented as taking the place of the electro-magnet in Fig. 233.

Fig. 234 is the same as Fig. 233 in every way, except that a permanent horseshoe magnet, N S, is shown instead of the electromagnet in Fig. 233.

In Fig. 235 is shown a helix, Q, with an armature adapted to swing toward or from the helix. In this case there may be a soft[Pg 427]-iron core in the helix, or the armature may assume the form of a solenoid core, there being no permanent core within the helix.

In Fig. 235, you can see a helix, Q, with an armature designed to swing towards or away from the helix. In this situation, there may be a soft[Pg 427]-iron core in the helix, or the armature could take the shape of a solenoid core, with no permanent core inside the helix.

Fig. 237, 238, 239.
Fig. 237.Fig. 238.Fig. 239.

Fig. 236 is an end view, and Fig. 237 a plan view, illustrating the method as applied to a swinging armature, A, and a stationary permanent magnet, N S. In this instance Mr. Tesla applies the heat to an auxiliary armature or keeper, T, which is adjacent to and preferably in direct contact with the magnet. This armature T, in the form of a plate of sheet-iron, extends across from one pole to the other and is of sufficient section to practically form a keeper for the magnet, so that when the armature T is cool nearly all the lines of force pass over the same and very little free magnetism is exhibited. Then the armature A, which swings freely on the pivots M in front of the poles N S, is very little attracted and the spring W pulls the same way from the poles into the position indicated in the diagram. The heat is directed upon the iron plate T at some distance from the magnet, so as to allow the magnet to keep comparatively cool. This heat is applied beneath the plate by means of the burners H, and there is a connection from the armature A or its pivot to the gas-cock 6, or other device for regulating the heat. The heat acting upon the middle portion of the plate T, the magnetic conductivity of the heated portion is diminished or destroyed, and a great number of the lines of force are deflected over the armature A, which is now powerfully attracted and drawn into line, or nearly so, with the poles N S. In so doing the cock 6 is nearly closed and the plate T cools, the lines of force are again deflected over the same, the attraction exerted upon the armature A is diminished, and the spring W pulls the same away from the magnet into the position shown by full lines, and the operations are repeated. The ar[Pg 428]rangement shown in Fig. 236 has the advantages that the magnet and armature are kept cool and the strength of the permanent magnet is better preserved, as the magnetic circuit is constantly closed.

Fig. 236 is a side view, and Fig. 237 a top view, showing how this method works with a swinging armature, A, and a stationary permanent magnet, N S. In this case, Mr. Tesla applies heat to an auxiliary armature or keeper, T, which is next to and ideally in direct contact with the magnet. This armature T, made of sheet iron, stretches across from one pole to the other and is thick enough to effectively act as a keeper for the magnet. When the armature T is cool, almost all the magnetic force lines pass through it, and there’s very little free magnetism. As a result, the armature A, which swings freely on pivots M in front of the poles N S, is attracted only slightly, and the spring W pulls it away from the poles according to the diagram. Heat is applied to the iron plate T at a distance from the magnet to keep the magnet relatively cool. This heat is delivered from underneath the plate using the burners H, and there’s a connection from the armature A or its pivot to the gas-cock 6 or another device for controlling the heat. The heat affecting the middle section of the plate T reduces or eliminates the magnetic conductivity in that area, causing many of the magnetic force lines to be redirected towards the armature A, which is now strongly attracted and almost aligns with the poles N S. As the gas cock 6 nearly closes, the plate T cools down, the magnetic lines of force then redirect over it, the attraction on the armature A decreases, and the spring W pulls it away from the magnet to the position indicated by the solid lines, repeating the process. The arrangement shown in Fig. 236 has the benefits of keeping both the magnet and armature cool and better preserving the strength of the permanent magnet, as the magnetic circuit remains continuously closed.

In the plan view, Fig. 238, is shown a permanent magnet and keeper plate, T, similar to those in Figs. 236 and 237, with the burners H for the gas beneath the same; but the armature is pivoted at one end to one pole of the magnet and the other end swings toward and from the other pole of the magnet. The spring W acts against a lever arm that projects from the armature, and the supply of heat has to be partly cut off by a connection to the swinging armature, so as to lessen the heat acting upon the keeper plate when the armature A has been attracted.

In the plan view, Fig. 238, you can see a permanent magnet and keeper plate, T, like those in Figs. 236 and 237, with the burners H for the gas below. The armature is attached at one end to one pole of the magnet, while the other end moves toward and away from the other pole of the magnet. The spring W works against a lever arm that extends from the armature, and the heat supply needs to be partially reduced through a connection to the swinging armature to decrease the heat acting on the keeper plate when the armature A gets attracted.

Fig. 240, 241.
Fig. 240.Fig. 241.

Fig. 239 is similar to Fig. 238, except that the keeper T is not made use of and the armature itself swings into and out of the range of the intense action of the heat from the burner H. Fig. 240 is a diagram similar to Fig. 231, except that in place of using a spring and stops, the armature is shown as connected by a link, to the crank of a fly-wheel, so that the fly-wheel will be revolved as rapidly as the armature can be heated and cooled to the necessary extent. A spring may be used in addition, as in Fig. 231. In Fig. 241 the armatures A A are connected by a link, so that one will be heating while the other is cooling, and the attraction exerted to move the cooled armature is availed of to draw away the heated armature instead of using a spring.[Pg 429]

Fig. 239 is similar to Fig. 238, except that the keeper T is not used, and the armature itself swings in and out of the intense heat from the burner H. Fig. 240 is a diagram like Fig. 231, but instead of using a spring and stops, the armature is shown as linked to the crank of a flywheel, allowing the flywheel to spin as fast as the armature can be heated and cooled appropriately. A spring can be added, similar to Fig. 231. In Fig. 241, the armatures A A are connected by a link, so that one heats while the other cools, and the force created to move the cooled armature is used to pull away the heated armature instead of employing a spring.[Pg 429]

Mr. Tesla has also devoted his attention to the development of a pyromagnetic generator of electricity[13] based upon the following laws: First, that electricity or electrical energy is developed in any conducting body by subjecting such body to a varying magnetic influence; and second, that the magnetic properties of iron or other magnetic substance may be partially or entirely destroyed or caused to disappear by raising it to a certain temperature, but restored and caused to reappear by again lowering its temperature to a certain degree. These laws may be applied in the production of electrical currents in many ways, the principle of which is in all cases the same, viz., to subject a conductor to a varying magnetic influence, producing such variations by the application of heat, or, more strictly speaking, by the application or action of a varying temperature upon the source of the magnetism. This principle of operation may be illustrated by a simple experiment: Place end to end, and preferably in actual contact, a permanently magnetized steel bar and a strip or bar of soft iron. Around the end of the iron bar or plate wind a coil of insulated wire. Then apply to the iron between the coil and the steel bar a flame or other source of heat which will be capable of raising that portion of the iron to an orange red, or a temperature of about 600° centigrade. When this condition is reached, the iron somewhat suddenly loses its magnetic properties, if it be very thin, and the same effect is produced as though the iron had been moved away from the magnet or the heated section had been removed. This change of position, however, is accompanied by a shifting of the magnetic lines, or, in other words, by a variation in the magnetic influence to which the coil is exposed, and a current in the coil is the result. Then remove the flame or in any other way reduce the temperature of the iron. The lowering of its temperature is accompanied by a return of its magnetic properties, and another change of magnetic conditions occurs, accompanied by a current in an opposite direction in the coil. The same operation may be [Pg 430]repeated indefinitely, the effect upon the coil being similar to that which would follow from moving the magnetized bar to and from the end of the iron bar or plate.

Mr. Tesla has also focused on developing a pyromagnetic generator of electricity[13] based on the following principles: First, that electricity or electrical energy is generated in any conducting material when it is exposed to a changing magnetic field; and second, that the magnetic properties of iron or other magnetic materials can be partially or completely obliterated by heating them to a certain temperature, but can be restored by cooling them back down to a specific degree. These principles can be applied in various ways to produce electrical currents, with the common approach being to expose a conductor to a changing magnetic field, which is created by applying heat or, more specifically, by the action of varying temperature on the source of the magnetism. This operational principle can be demonstrated with a simple experiment: Place a permanently magnetized steel bar and a soft iron strip or bar end to end, making sure they are in contact. Next, wrap a coil of insulated wire around the end of the iron bar or plate. Then apply a flame or other heat source to the iron between the coil and the steel bar, enough to heat that part of the iron to an orange-red glow, or about 600° Celsius. Once this temperature is reached, the iron quickly loses its magnetic properties if it is thin, resulting in an effect similar to moving the iron away from the magnet or removing the heated section. However, this change in position causes the magnetic lines to shift, which means the coil experiences a change in magnetic influence, resulting in a current in the coil. Then, remove the flame or otherwise cool down the iron. As its temperature decreases, the magnetic properties return, leading to another change in the magnetic conditions, which causes a current in the opposite direction in the coil. This process can be repeated indefinitely, producing effects in the coil similar to those that would occur if the magnetized bar were moved to and from the end of the iron bar or plate.

The device illustrated below is a means of obtaining this result, the features of novelty in the invention being, first, the employment of an artificial cooling device, and, second, inclosing the source of heat and that portion of the magnetic circuit exposed to the heat and artificially cooling the heated part.

The device shown below is a way to achieve this result, with the innovative features being, first, the use of an artificial cooling mechanism, and, second, enclosing the heat source and the part of the magnetic circuit exposed to the heat while artificially cooling the heated section.

These improvements are applicable generally to the generators constructed on the plan above described—that is to say, we may use an artificial cooling device in conjunction with a variable or varied or uniform source of heat.

These improvements generally apply to the generators built according to the plan described above—that is, we can use an artificial cooling device along with a variable, mixed, or consistent heat source.

Fig. 242, 243.
Fig. 242.Fig. 243.

Fig. 242 is a central vertical longitudinal section of the complete apparatus and Fig. 243 is a cross-section of the magnetic armature-core of the generator.

Fig. 242 is a central vertical longitudinal section of the complete apparatus, and Fig. 243 is a cross-section of the magnetic armature core of the generator.

Let A represent a magnetized core or permanent magnet the poles of which are bridged by an armature-core composed of a casing or shell B inclosing a number of hollow iron tubes C. Around this core are wound the conductors E E', to form the coils in which the currents are developed. In the circuits of these coils are current-consuming devices, as F F'.

Let A represent a magnetized core or permanent magnet whose poles are connected by an armature-core made of a casing or shell B that encloses several hollow iron tubes C. Wrapped around this core are the conductors E E', creating the coils where the currents are generated. In the circuits of these coils are devices that use current, such as F F'.

D is a furnace or closed fire-box, through which the central portion of the core B extends. Above the fire is a boiler K, containing water. The flue L from the fire-box may extend up through the boiler.

D is a furnace or enclosed firebox that the central part of the core B goes through. Above the fire is a boiler K that holds water. The flue L from the firebox may extend up through the boiler.

G is a water-supply pipe, and H is the steam-exhaust pipe, which communicates with all the tubes C in the armature B, so that steam escaping from the boiler will pass through the tubes.[Pg 431]

G is a water-supply pipe, and H is the steam-exhaust pipe, which connects to all the tubes C in the armature B, so that steam escaping from the boiler flows through the tubes.[Pg 431]

In the steam-exhaust pipe H is a valve V, to which is connected the lever I, by the movement of which the valve is opened or closed. In such a case as this the heat of the fire may be utilized for other purposes after as much of it as may be needed has been applied to heating the core B. There are special advantages in the employment of a cooling device, in that the metal of the core B is not so quickly oxidized. Moreover, the difference between the temperature of the applied heat and of the steam, air, or whatever gas or fluid be applied as the cooling medium, may be increased or decreased at will, whereby the rapidity of the magnetic changes or fluctuations may be regulated.

In the steam-exhaust pipe H, there is a valve V connected to lever I, which opens or closes the valve when moved. In this situation, the heat from the fire can be used for other purposes after enough of it has been used to heat the core B. There are specific benefits to using a cooling device because it prevents the metal of core B from oxidizing as quickly. Additionally, the difference between the temperature of the applied heat and that of the steam, air, or any gas or fluid used as the cooling medium can be adjusted, allowing for control over the speed of the magnetic changes or fluctuations.


CHAPTER XXXVII.

Anti-Sparking Dynamo Brush & Commutator.

In direct current dynamos of great electromotive force—such, for instance, as those used for arc lighting—when one commutator bar or plate comes out of contact with the collecting-brush a spark is apt to appear on the commutator. This spark may be due to the break of the complete circuit, or to a shunt of low resistance formed by the brush between two or more commutator-bars. In the first case the spark is more apparent, as there is at the moment when the circuit is broken a discharge of the magnets through the field helices, producing a great spark or flash which causes an unsteady current, rapid wear of the commutator bars and brushes, and waste of power. The sparking may be reduced by various devices, such as providing a path for the current at the moment when the commutator segment or bar leaves the brush, by short-circuiting the field-helices, by increasing the number of the commutator-bars, or by other similar means; but all these devices are expensive or not fully available, and seldom attain the object desired.

In high-voltage direct current dynamos—like those used for arc lighting—when a commutator bar or plate loses contact with the collecting brush, a spark can occur on the commutator. This spark might be caused by the disruption of the complete circuit or by a low-resistance shunt created by the brush connecting two or more commutator bars. In the first scenario, the spark is more noticeable because breaking the circuit leads to a discharge of the magnets through the field coils, producing a large spark or flash that creates an unstable current, accelerates the wear of the commutator bars and brushes, and wastes power. Sparking can be reduced through various methods, such as creating a path for the current when the commutator segment or bar separates from the brush, short-circuiting the field coils, increasing the number of commutator bars, or using other similar techniques; however, all these solutions are costly or not fully practical, and often do not achieve the desired result.

To prevent this sparking in a simple manner, Mr. Tesla some years ago employed with the commutator-bars and intervening insulating material, mica, asbestos paper or other insulating and incombustible material, arranged to bear on the surface of the commutator, near to and behind the brush.

To easily prevent this sparking, Mr. Tesla several years ago used commutator bars along with insulating materials like mica, asbestos paper, or other non-flammable insulators that were set up to touch the surface of the commutator, close to and behind the brush.

In the drawings, Fig. 244 is a section of a commutator with an asbestos insulating device; and Fig. 245 is a similar view, representing two plates of mica upon the back of the brush.

In the drawings, Fig. 244 shows a section of a commutator with an asbestos insulating device; and Fig. 245 is a similar view, showing two mica plates on the back of the brush.

In 244, C represents the commutator and intervening insulating material; B B, the brushes. d d are sheets of asbestos paper or other suitable non-conducting material. f f are springs, the pressure of which may be adjusted by means of the screws g g.

In 244, C stands for the commutator and the insulating material in between; B B are the brushes. d d are sheets of asbestos paper or other appropriate non-conductive material. f f are springs, and their pressure can be adjusted using the screws g g.

In Fig. 245 a simple arrangement is shown with two plates of mica or other material. It will be seen that whenever one com[Pg 433]mutator segment passes out of contact with the brush, the formation of the arc will be prevented by the intervening insulating material coming in contact with the insulating material on the brush.

In Fig. 245, a straightforward setup is shown with two plates of mica or another material. You can see that every time one commutator segment loses contact with the brush, the formation of the arc will be stopped by the insulating material in between touching the insulating material on the brush.

Fig. 244, 245.
Fig. 244.Fig. 245.

Asbestos paper or cloth impregnated with zinc-oxide, magnesia, zirconia, or other suitable material, may be used, as the paper and cloth are soft, and serve at the same time to wipe and polish the commutator; but mica or any other suitable material can be employed, provided the material be an insulator or a bad conductor of electricity.

Asbestos paper or cloth soaked in zinc oxide, magnesia, zirconia, or other appropriate materials can be used, as the paper and cloth are soft and also help to wipe and polish the commutator. However, mica or any other suitable material can be used as long as it's an insulator or a poor conductor of electricity.

A few years later Mr. Tesla turned his attention again to the same subject, as, perhaps, was very natural in view of the fact that the commutator had always been prominent in his thoughts, and that so much of his work was even aimed at dispensing with it entirely as an objectionable and unnecessary part of dynamos and motors. In these later efforts to remedy commutator troubles, Mr. Tesla constructs a commutator and the collectors therefor in two parts mutually adapted to one another, and, so far as the essential features are concerned, alike in mechanical structure. Selecting as an illustration a commutator of two segments adapted for use with an armature the coils or coil of which have but two free ends, connected respectively to the segments, the bearing-surface is the face of a disc, and is formed of two metallic quadrant segments and two insulating segments of the same dimensions, and the face of the disc is smoothed off, so that the metal and insulating segments are flush. The part which takes the place of the usual brushes, or the "collector," is a disc of the same character as the commutator and has a surface similarly formed with two insulating and two metallic segments. These two parts are mounted with their faces in contact and in such manner that the rotation of the armature causes the commutator to turn upon the collector, whereby the currents induced in the[Pg 434] coils are taken off by the collector segments and thence conveyed off by suitable conductors leading from the collector segments. This is the general plan of the construction adopted. Aside from certain adjuncts, the nature and functions of which are set forth later, this means of commutation will be seen to possess many important advantages. In the first place the short-circuiting and the breaking of the armature coil connected to the commutator-segments occur at the same instant, and from the nature of the construction this will be done with the greatest precision; secondly, the duration of both the break and of the short circuit will be reduced to a minimum. The first results in a reduction which amounts practically to a suppression of the spark, since the break and the short circuit produce opposite effects in the armature-coil. The second has the effect of diminishing the destructive effect of a spark, since this would be in a measure proportional to the duration of the spark; while lessening the duration of the short circuit obviously increases the efficiency of the machine.

A few years later, Mr. Tesla focused on the same topic again, which was quite natural given that the commutator had always been on his mind, and so much of his work aimed at eliminating it entirely as an undesirable and unnecessary component of dynamos and motors. In his later attempts to solve commutator issues, Mr. Tesla designed a commutator and its collectors in two parts that fit together and, as far as the key features are concerned, are similar in mechanical design. Using an example of a commutator with two segments suited for an armature with just two free ends connected to the segments, the bearing surface is the face of a disc made up of two metallic quadrant segments and two insulating segments of the same size, with the face of the disc smoothed so that the metal and insulating parts are flush. The part that replaces the usual brushes or "collector" is a disc of the same kind as the commutator, also featuring a surface made up of two insulating and two metallic segments. These two parts are mounted with their faces touching, allowing the rotation of the armature to cause the commutator to rotate on the collector, where the currents produced in the coils are picked up by the collector segments and then transmitted through suitable conductors leading away from the collector segments. This is the general design of the construction adopted. Besides certain additional components, the nature and functions of which are explained later, this method of commutation has many significant advantages. Firstly, the short-circuiting and the disconnection of the armature coil connected to the commutator segments happen at the same moment, and due to the design, this occurs with the highest precision; secondly, both the duration of the break and the short circuit will be minimized. The first results in a reduction that is practically the suppression of the spark since the break and the short circuit create opposing effects in the armature coil. The second minimizes the damaging effects of a spark, as the damage is somewhat proportional to how long the spark lasts; while reducing the duration of the short circuit clearly enhances the machine's efficiency.

Fig. 246, 247.
Fig. 246.Fig. 247.

The mechanical advantages will be better understood by referring to the accompanying diagrams, in which Fig. 246 is a central longitudinal section of the end of a shaft with the improved commutator carried thereon. Fig. 247 is a view of the inner or bearing face of the collector. Fig. 248 is an end view from the armature side of a modified form of commutator. Figs.[Pg 435] 249 and 250 are views of details of Fig. 248. Fig. 251 is a longitudinal central section of another modification, and Fig. 252 is a sectional view of the same. A is the end of the armature-shaft of a dynamo-electric machine or motor. A' is a sleeve of insulating material around the shaft, secured in place by a screw, a'.

The mechanical benefits will be clearer when referring to the accompanying diagrams. Fig. 246 shows a central longitudinal section of the end of a shaft with the improved commutator attached. Fig. 247 is a view of the inner bearing face of the collector. Fig. 248 is an end view from the armature side of a modified type of commutator. Figs.[Pg 435] 249 and 250 display details from Fig. 248. Fig. 251 is a longitudinal central section of another modification, and Fig. 252 is a sectional view of the same. A is the end of the armature shaft of a dynamo-electric machine or motor. A' is a sleeve made of insulating material around the shaft, secured in place by a screw, a'.

Fig. 248, 249, 250.
Fig. 248.Fig. 249.     Fig. 250.

The commutator proper is in the form of a disc which is made up of four segments D D' G G', similar to those shown in Fig. 248. Two of these segments, as D D', are of metal and are in electrical connection with the ends of the coils on the armature. The other two segments are of insulating material. The segments are held in place by a band, B, of insulating material. The disc is held in place by friction or by screws, g' g', Fig. 248, which secure the disc firmly to the sleeve A'.

The commutator is shaped like a disc made up of four segments D D' G G', similar to those shown in Fig. 248. Two of these segments, D D', are made of metal and connect electrically to the ends of the coils on the armature. The other two segments are made of insulating material. The segments are kept in place by a band, B, made of insulating material. The disc is secured by friction or by screws, g' g', in Fig. 248, which fasten the disc firmly to the sleeve A'.

The collector is made in the same form as the commutator. It is composed of the two metallic segments E E' and the two insulating segments F F', bound together by a band, C. The metallic segments E E' are of the same or practically the same width or extent as the insulating segments or spaces of the commutator. The collector is secured to a sleeve, B', by screws g g, and the sleeve is arranged to turn freely on the shaft A. The end of the sleeve B' is closed by a plate, f, upon which presses a pivot-pointed screw, h, adjustable in a spring, H, which acts to maintain the collector in close contact with the commutator and to compensate for the play of the shaft. The collector is so fixed that it cannot turn with the shaft. For example, the diagram shows a slotted plate, K, which is designed to be attached to a stationary support, and an arm extending from the collector and carrying a clamping screw, L, by which the collector may be adjusted and set to the desired position.

The collector is designed in the same shape as the commutator. It's made up of two metal segments E E' and two insulating segments F F', held together by a band, C. The metal segments E E' are about the same width as the insulating segments or spaces of the commutator. The collector is attached to a sleeve, B', using screws g g, and the sleeve is designed to rotate freely on the shaft A. The end of the sleeve B' is capped with a plate, f, which is pressed by an adjustable pivot-pointed screw, h, that is set in a spring, H. This setup helps keep the collector in close contact with the commutator and compensates for any play in the shaft. The collector is fixed in a way that it cannot rotate with the shaft. For instance, the diagram illustrates a slotted plate, K, that is meant to be attached to a stationary support, along with an arm extending from the collector that has a clamping screw, L, which allows the collector to be adjusted and positioned as needed.

Mr. Tesla prefers the form shown in Figs. 246 and 247 to fit[Pg 436] the insulating segments of both commutator and collector loosely and to provide some means—as, for example, light springs, e e, secured to the bands A' B', respectively, and bearing against the segments—to exert a light pressure upon them and keep them in close contact and to compensate for wear. The metal segments of the commutator may be moved forward by loosening the screw a'.

Mr. Tesla prefers the design shown in Figs. 246 and 247 to fit[Pg 436] the insulating parts of both the commutator and collector loosely. He wants to include a way—such as light springs, e e, attached to the bands A' B', respectively—that press against the segments to apply a slight pressure on them, keeping them in close contact and compensating for wear. The metal segments of the commutator can be moved forward by loosening the screw a'.

The line wires are fed from the metal segments of the collector, being secured thereto in any convenient manner, the plan of connections being shown as applied to a modified form of the commutator in Fig. 251. The commutator and the collector in thus presenting two flat and smooth bearing surfaces prevent most effectually by mechanical action the occurrence of sparks.

The line wires come from the metal parts of the collector, attached in a convenient way, with the connection plan illustrated as it relates to a modified version of the commutator in Fig. 251. The commutator and the collector, having two flat and smooth surfaces, effectively prevent sparks from happening through mechanical action.

The insulating segments are made of some hard material capable of being polished and formed with sharp edges. Such materials as glass, marble, or soapstone may be advantageously used. The metal segments are preferably of copper or brass; but they may have a facing or edge of durable material—such as platinum or the like—where the sparks are liable to occur.

The insulating parts are made from a tough material that can be polished and shaped with sharp edges. Materials like glass, marble, or soapstone can be used effectively. The metal parts are ideally made of copper or brass; however, they can have a covering or edge of a strong material—like platinum or something similar—where sparks are likely to happen.

Fig. 251, 252.
Fig. 251.Fig. 252.

In Fig. 248 a somewhat modified form of the invention is shown, a form designed to facilitate the construction and replacing of the parts. In this modification the commutator and collector are made in substantially the same manner as previously described, except that the bands B C are omitted. The four segments of each part, however, are secured to their respective sleeves by screws g' g', and one edge of each segment is cut away, so that small plates a b may be slipped into the spaces thus formed. Of[Pg 437] these plates a a are of metal, and are in contact with the metal segments D D', respectively. The other two, b b, are of glass or marble, and they are all better square, as shown in Figs. 249 and 250, so that they may be turned to present new edges should any edge become worn by use. Light springs d bear upon these plates and press those in the commutator toward those in the collector, and insulating strips c c are secured to the periphery of the discs to prevent the blocks from being thrown out by centrifugal action. These plates are, of course, useful at those edges of the segments only where sparks are liable to occur, and, as they are easily replaced, they are of great advantage. It is considered best to coat them with platinum or silver.

In Fig. 248, a slightly modified version of the invention is shown, designed to make it easier to build and replace the parts. In this modification, the commutator and collector are made in almost the same way as previously described, except that the bands B C are left out. The four segments of each part are secured to their respective sleeves with screws g' g', and one edge of each segment is cut away so that small plates a b can be slipped into the spaces created. Of these plates, a a are metal and make contact with the metal segments D D', respectively. The other two, b b, are made of glass or marble, and all of them are better shaped as squares, as shown in Figs. 249 and 250, so they can be rotated to present new edges if any edge becomes worn out from use. Light springs d press against these plates, pushing those in the commutator toward those in the collector, and insulating strips c c are attached to the outer edge of the discs to prevent the blocks from being ejected by centrifugal force. These plates are useful only at the edges of the segments where sparks are likely to occur, and since they can be easily replaced, they are very beneficial. It’s recommended to coat them in platinum or silver.

In Figs. 251 and 252 is shown a construction where, instead of solid segments, a fluid is employed. In this case the commutator and collector are made of two insulating discs, S T, and in lieu of the metal segments a space is cut out of each part, as at R R', corresponding in shape and size to a metal segment. The two parts are fitted smoothly and the collector T held by the screw h and spring H against the commutator S. As in the other cases, the commutator revolves while the collector remains stationary. The ends of the coils are connected to binding-posts s s, which are in electrical connection with metal plates t t within the recesses in the two parts S T. These chambers or recesses are filled with mercury, and in the collector part are tubes W W, with screws w w, carrying springs X and pistons X', which compensate for the expansion and contraction of the mercury under varying temperatures, but which are sufficiently strong not to yield to the pressure of the fluid due to centrifugal action, and which serve as binding-posts.

In Figs. 251 and 252, you can see a design that uses a fluid instead of solid segments. In this setup, the commutator and collector consist of two insulating discs, S T. Instead of metal segments, each part has a space cut out, like at R R', which matches the shape and size of a metal segment. The two parts fit together smoothly, and the collector T is held by the screw h and spring H against the commutator S. As in previous designs, the commutator rotates while the collector stays still. The coil ends connect to binding posts s s, which are electrically linked to metal plates t t inside the cutouts in the two parts S T. These compartments are filled with mercury, and in the collector section, there are tubes W W with screws w w, which have springs X and pistons X' to handle the expansion and contraction of the mercury with changing temperatures. These components are strong enough to resist the pressure from the fluid due to centrifugal force and also act as binding posts.

In all the above cases the commutators are adapted for a single coil, and the device is particularly suited to such purposes. The number of segments may be increased, however, or more than one commutator used with a single armature. Although the bearing-surfaces are shown as planes at right angles to the shaft or axis, it is evident that in this particular the construction may be very greatly modified.

In all the cases mentioned above, the commutators are designed for a single coil, and the device is especially suitable for that purpose. However, the number of segments can be increased, or more than one commutator can be used with a single armature. Although the bearing surfaces are depicted as flat and perpendicular to the shaft or axis, it’s clear that the construction can be significantly altered in this regard.


CHAPTER XXXVIII.

Auxiliary Brush Control for Direct Current Dynamos.

An interesting method devised by Mr. Tesla for the regulation of direct current dynamos, is that which has come to be known as the "third brush" method. In machines of this type, devised by him as far back as 1885, he makes use of two main brushes to which the ends of the field magnet coils are connected, an auxiliary brush, and a branch or shunt connection from an intermediate point of the field wire to the auxiliary brush.[14]

An interesting method created by Mr. Tesla for regulating direct current dynamos is known as the "third brush" method. In machines of this type, developed by him back in 1885, he uses two main brushes connected to the ends of the field magnet coils, along with an auxiliary brush and a branch or shunt connection from an intermediate point of the field wire to the auxiliary brush.[14]

The relative positions of the respective brushes are varied, either automatically or by hand, so that the shunt becomes inoperative when the auxiliary brush has a certain position upon the commutator; but when the auxiliary brush is moved in its relation to the main brushes, or the latter are moved in their relation to the auxiliary brush, the electric condition is disturbed and more or less of the current through the field-helices is diverted through the shunt or a current is passed over the shunt to the field-helices. By varying the relative position upon the commutator of the respective brushes automatically in proportion to the varying electrical conditions of the working-circuit, the current developed can be regulated in proportion to the demands in the working-circuit.

The positions of the different brushes can be adjusted, either automatically or manually, so that the shunt doesn't work when the auxiliary brush is in a specific spot on the commutator. However, when the auxiliary brush is moved relative to the main brushes, or the main brushes are moved relative to the auxiliary brush, the electric flow is disrupted and some or all of the current going through the field coils is redirected through the shunt, or a current flows over the shunt to the field coils. By adjusting the positions of the brushes on the commutator automatically according to the changing electrical conditions of the working circuit, the generated current can be controlled based on the needs of the working circuit.

Fig. 253 is a diagram illustrating the invention, showing one core of the field-magnets with one helix wound in the same direction throughout. Figs. 254 and 255 are diagrams showing one core of the field-magnets with a portion of the helices wound in opposite directions. Figs. 256 and 257 are diagrams illustrating [Pg 439]the electric devices that may be employed for automatically adjusting the brushes, and Fig. 258 is a diagram illustrating the positions of the brushes when the machine is being energized at the start.

Fig. 253 is a diagram showing the invention, featuring one core of the field magnets with one helix wound in the same direction throughout. Figs. 254 and 255 are diagrams displaying one core of the field magnets with part of the helices wound in opposite directions. Figs. 256 and 257 are diagrams illustrating [Pg 439] the electric devices that can be used for automatically adjusting the brushes, and Fig. 258 is a diagram showing the positions of the brushes when the machine is being powered on at the start.

a and b are the positive and negative brushes of the main or working-circuit, and c the auxiliary brush. The working-circuit D extends from the brushes a and b, as usual, and contains electric lamps or other devices, D', either in series or in multiple arc.

a and b are the positive and negative brushes of the main or working circuit, while c is the auxiliary brush. The working circuit D runs from the brushes a and b, as usual, and includes electric lamps or other devices, D', either in series or in parallel.

M M' represent the field-helices, the ends of which are connected to the main brushes a and b. The branch or shunt wire c' extends from the auxiliary brush c to the circuit of the field-helices, and is connected to the same at an intermediate point, x.

M M' represent the field-helices, which connect to the main brushes a and b. The branch or shunt wire c' runs from the auxiliary brush c to the field-helices circuit and connects to it at a midpoint, x.

Fig. 253. Fig. 253.

H represents the commutator, with the plates of ordinary construction. When the auxiliary brush c occupies such a position upon the commutator that the electro-motive force between the brushes a and c is to the electro-motive force between the brushes c and b as the resistance of the circuit a M c' c A is to the resistance of the circuit b M' c' c B, the potentials of the points x and Y will be equal, and no current will flow over the auxiliary brush; but when the brush c occupies a different position the potentials of the points x and Y will be different, and a current will flow over the auxiliary brush to and from the commutator, according to the relative position of the brushes. If, for instance, the commutator-space between the brushes a and c, when the latter is at the neutral point, is diminished, a current will flow from the point Y over the shunt c to the brush b, thus strengthening the current in the part M', and partly neutralizing the current in part M; but if the space between the brushes a and c is increased, the cur[Pg 440]rent will flow over the auxiliary brush in an opposite direction, and the current in M will be strengthened, and in M', partly neutralized.

H denotes the commutator, with the standard construction plates. When the auxiliary brush c is positioned on the commutator such that the voltage between the brushes a and c is proportional to the voltage between the brushes c and b, in the same way that the resistance of circuit a M c' c A relates to the resistance of circuit b M' c' c B, the potentials at points x and Y will match, and no current will flow through the auxiliary brush; however, when brush c moves to a different position, the potentials at points x and Y will differ, causing a current to flow over the auxiliary brush to and from the commutator, depending on the relative positions of the brushes. For example, if the commutator space between brushes a and c decreases, when c is at the neutral point, a current will move from point Y over shunt c to brush b, thereby boosting the current in section M' and partially canceling the current in section M; on the other hand, if the space between brushes a and c increases, the current will flow over the auxiliary brush in the opposite direction, strengthening the current in M and partially diminishing it in M'.

By combining with the brushes a, b, and c any usual automatic regulating mechanism, the current developed can be regulated in proportion to the demands in the working circuit. The parts M and M' of the field wire may be wound in the same direction. In this case they are arranged as shown in Fig. 253; or the part M may be wound in the opposite direction, as shown in Figs. 254 and 255.

By combining brushes a, b, and c with any standard automatic regulating mechanism, the current generated can be adjusted according to the requirements of the working circuit. The components M and M' of the field wire can be wound in the same direction. In this scenario, they are positioned as illustrated in Fig. 253; alternatively, component M can be wound in the opposite direction, as depicted in Figs. 254 and 255.

Fig. 254. Fig. 254.

It will be apparent that the respective cores of the field-magnets are subjected to neutralizing or intensifying effects of the current in the shunt through c', and the magnetism of the cores will be partially neutralized, or the points of greatest magnetism shifted, so that it will be more or less remote from or approaching to the armature, and hence the aggregate energizing actions of the field magnets on the armature will be correspondingly varied.

It will be clear that the cores of the field magnets are influenced by the neutralizing or intensifying effects of the current in the shunt through c', causing the magnetism of the cores to be partially neutralized, or the points of maximum magnetism to shift. This means that the strongest magnetism will be either closer to or further away from the armature, which in turn will cause the overall energizing effects of the field magnets on the armature to change accordingly.

In the form indicated in Fig. 253 the regulation is effected by shifting the point of greatest magnetism, and in Figs. 254 and 255 the same effect is produced by the action of the current in the shunt passing through the neutralizing helix.

In the form shown in Fig. 253, the regulation is done by moving the point of strongest magnetism, and in Figs. 254 and 255, the same result is achieved through the current's action in the shunt that goes through the neutralizing helix.

The relative positions of the respective brushes may be varied by moving the auxiliary brush, or the brush c may remain stationary and the core P be connected to the main-brush holder A, so as to adjust the brushes a b in their relation to the brush c. If, however, an adjustment is applied to all the brushes, as seen in Fig. 257, the solenoid should be connected to both a and c, so as to move them toward or away from each other.

The positions of the brushes can be changed by moving the auxiliary brush, or the brush c can stay in place while the core P is attached to the main brush holder A, allowing for adjustments of brushes a and b in relation to brush c. However, if an adjustment is made to all the brushes, as shown in Fig. 257, the solenoid should be connected to both a and c, to move them closer together or further apart.

There are several known devices for giving motion in propor[Pg 441]tion to an electric current. In Figs. 256 and 257 the moving cores are shown as convenient devices for obtaining the required extent of motion with very slight changes in the current passing through the helices. It is understood that the adjustment of the main brushes causes variations in the strength of the current independently of the relative position of those brushes to the auxiliary brush. In all cases the adjustment should be such that no current flows over the auxiliary brush when the dynamo is running with its normal load.

There are several devices known for generating motion in proportion to an electric current. In Figs. 256 and 257, the moving cores are illustrated as useful tools for achieving the necessary range of motion with minimal changes in the current flowing through the coils. It’s understood that adjusting the main brushes leads to variations in current strength, regardless of the relative position of those brushes to the auxiliary brush. In all situations, the adjustment should ensure that no current flows over the auxiliary brush when the dynamo is operating under its normal load.

In Figs. 256 and 257 A A indicate the main-brush holder, carrying the main brushes, and C the auxiliary-brush holder, carrying the auxiliary brush. These brush-holders are movable in arcs concentric with the centre of the commutator-shaft. An iron piston, P, of the solenoid S, Fig. 256, is attached to the auxiliary-brush holder C. The adjustment is effected by means of a spring and screw or tightener.

In Figs. 256 and 257, A A represent the main-brush holder, which holds the main brushes, while C shows the auxiliary-brush holder, which holds the auxiliary brush. These brush holders can move in arcs that are concentric with the center of the commutator shaft. An iron piston, P, from the solenoid S in Fig. 256, is connected to the auxiliary-brush holder C. The adjustment is made using a spring and a screw or tightener.

In Fig. 257 instead of a solenoid, an iron tube inclosing a coil is shown. The piston of the coil is attached to both brush-holders A A and C. When the brushes are moved directly by electrical devices, as shown in Figs. 256 and 257, these are so constructed that the force exerted for adjusting is practically uniform through the whole length of motion.

In Fig. 257, instead of a solenoid, there's an iron tube surrounding a coil. The piston of the coil is connected to both brush-holders A A and C. When the brushes are moved directly by electrical devices, as shown in Figs. 256 and 257, they are designed so that the force used for adjustment is nearly uniform throughout the entire range of motion.

Fig. 255. Fig. 255.

It is true that auxiliary brushes have been used in connection with the helices of the field-wire; but in these instances the helices receive the entire current through the auxiliary brush or brushes, and these brushes could not be taken off without breaking the circuit through the field. These brushes cause, moreover, heavy sparking at the commutator. In the present case the auxiliary brush causes very little or no sparking, and can be taken off without breaking the circuit through the field[Pg 442]-helices. The arrangement has, besides, the advantage of facilitating the self-excitation of the machine in all cases where the resistance of the field-wire is very great comparatively to the resistance of the main circuit at the start—for instance, on arc-light machines. In this case the auxiliary brush c is placed near to, or better still in contact with, the brush b, as shown in Fig. 258. In this manner the part M' is completely cut out, and as the part M has a considerably smaller resistance than the whole length of the field-wire the machine excites itself, whereupon the auxiliary brush is shifted automatically to its normal position.

It’s true that auxiliary brushes have been used with the field-wire helices, but in those cases, the helices receive the full current through the auxiliary brush or brushes, and those brushes can’t be removed without breaking the circuit through the field. Additionally, these brushes create significant sparking at the commutator. In the current situation, the auxiliary brush causes very little or no sparking and can be removed without interrupting the circuit through the field helices. This setup also makes it easier for the machine to self-excite, especially when the resistance of the field-wire is relatively high compared to the resistance of the main circuit at startup—like with arc-light machines. Here, the auxiliary brush c is positioned close to, or ideally in contact with, the brush b, as shown in Fig. 258. This way, the part M' is completely removed, and since part M has much less resistance than the entire length of the field-wire, the machine self-excites, after which the auxiliary brush automatically returns to its normal position.

Fig. 256, 257.
Fig. 256.Fig. 257.

In a further method devised by Mr. Tesla, one or more auxiliary brushes are employed, by means of which a portion or the whole of the field coils is shunted. According to the relative position upon the commutator of the respective brushes more or less current is caused to pass through the helices of the field, and the current developed by the machine can be varied at will by varying the relative positions of the brushes.

In another method created by Mr. Tesla, one or more extra brushes are used, allowing part or all of the field coils to be bypassed. Depending on the alignment of the brushes on the commutator, more or less current flows through the field coils, and the machine's output current can be adjusted by changing the positions of the brushes.

Fig. 258. Fig. 258.

In Fig. 259, a and b are the positive and negative brushes of the main circuit, and c an auxiliary brush. The main circuit D extends from the brushes a and b, as usual, and contains the helices M of the field wire and the electric lamps or other working devices. The auxiliary brush c is connected to the point x of the main circuit by means of the wire c'. H is a commutator[Pg 443] of ordinary construction. It will have been seen from what was said already that when the electro-motive force between the brushes a and c is to the electromotive force between the brushes c and b as the resistance of the circuit a M c' c A is to the resistance of the circuit b C B c c' D, the potentials of the points x and y will be equal, and no current will pass over the auxiliary brush c; but if that brush occupies a different position relatively to the main brushes the electric condition is disturbed, and current will flow either from y to x or from x to y, according to the relative position of the brushes. In the first case the current through the field-helices will be partly neutralized and the magnetism of the field magnets will be diminished. In the second case the current will be increased and the magnets gain strength. By combining with the brushes at a b c any automatic regulating mechanism, the current developed can be regulated automatically in proportion to the demands of the working circuit.

In Fig. 259, a and b are the positive and negative brushes of the main circuit, and c is an auxiliary brush. The main circuit D runs from the brushes a and b, as usual, and includes the helices M of the field wire and the electric lamps or other devices in use. The auxiliary brush c is connected to point x of the main circuit via wire c'. H is a standard commutator[Pg 443]. As mentioned before, when the electromotive force between brushes a and c is to the electromotive force between brushes c and b in the same ratio as the resistance of the circuit a M c' c A is to the resistance of the circuit b C B c c' D, the potentials at points x and y will be equal, and no current will flow over the auxiliary brush c; however, if that brush is positioned differently relative to the main brushes, the electric condition is disturbed, and current will flow either from y to x or from x to y, depending on the relative positions of the brushes. In the first scenario, the current through the field helices will be partially canceled out, reducing the magnetism of the field magnets. In the second scenario, the current will increase, strengthening the magnets. By integrating any automatic regulating mechanism with the brushes at a b c, the developed current can be automatically adjusted in response to the demands of the working circuit.

In Figs. 264 and 265 some of the automatic means are represented that maybe used for moving the brushes. The core P, Fig. 264, of the solenoid-helix S is connected with the brush a to move the same, and in Fig. 265 the core P is shown as within the helix S, and connected with brushes a and c, so as to move the same toward or from each other, according to the strength of the current in the helix, the helix being within an iron tube, S', that becomes magnetized and increases the action of the solenoid.

In Figs. 264 and 265, some automatic methods for moving the brushes are shown. The core P in Fig. 264 of the solenoid helix S is connected to brush a to facilitate its movement. In Fig. 265, the core P is illustrated inside the helix S, connected to brushes a and c, allowing them to move towards or away from each other depending on the strength of the current in the helix. The helix is placed inside an iron tube, S', which becomes magnetized and enhances the solenoid's effect.

In practice it is sufficient to move only the auxiliary brush, as shown in Fig. 264, as the regulation is very sensitive to the slightest changes; but the relative position of the auxiliary brush to the main brushes may be varied by moving the main brushes, or both main and auxiliary brushes may be moved, as illustrated in Fig. 265. In the latter two cases, it will be understood, the motion of the main brushes relatively to the neutral line of the machine causes variations in the strength of the current independently of their relative position to the auxiliary brush. In all cases the adjustment may be such that when the machine is running with the ordinary load, no current flows over the auxiliary brush.

In practice, it's usually enough to adjust just the auxiliary brush, as shown in Fig. 264, since the regulation is very sensitive to even the slightest changes. However, you can also change the position of the auxiliary brush relative to the main brushes by moving the main brushes, or you can move both the main and auxiliary brushes, as illustrated in Fig. 265. In those last two cases, it's important to note that moving the main brushes in relation to the machine's neutral line leads to changes in the current strength, regardless of their position relative to the auxiliary brush. In all situations, the adjustment can be set so that when the machine is operating under normal load, no current flows through the auxiliary brush.

The field helices may be connected, as shown in Fig. 259, or a part of the field helices may be in the outgoing and the other part in the return circuit, and two auxiliary brushes may be employed as shown in Figs. 261 and 262. Instead of shunting the whole of the field helices, a portion only of such helices may be shunted, as shown in Figs. 260 and 262.[Pg 444]

The field coils can be linked together, as illustrated in Fig. 259, or some of the field coils can be part of the outgoing circuit while the rest are in the return circuit, and two additional brushes can be used as shown in Figs. 261 and 262. Rather than shunting all the field coils, only a part of them can be shunted, as depicted in Figs. 260 and 262.[Pg 444]

The arrangement shown in Fig. 262 is advantageous, as it diminishes the sparking upon the commutator, the main circuit being closed through the auxiliary brushes at the moment of the break of the circuit at the main brushes.

The setup shown in Fig. 262 is beneficial because it reduces sparking on the commutator, with the main circuit being completed through the auxiliary brushes at the moment the circuit breaks at the main brushes.

Fig. 259. Fig. 259. Fig. 260. Fig. 260. Fig. 261. Fig. 261. Fig. 262, 263.
Fig. 262.Fig. 263.

The field helices may be wound in the same direction, or a part may be wound in opposite directions.

The field helices can be twisted in the same direction, or one part can be twisted in the opposite direction.

The connection between the helices and the auxiliary brush or brushes may be made by a wire of small resistance, or a resistance may be interposed (R, Fig. 263,) between the point x and the[Pg 445] auxiliary brush or brushes to divide the sensitiveness when the brushes are adjusted.

The link between the helices and the auxiliary brush or brushes can be made with a low-resistance wire, or a resistor (R, Fig. 263) can be placed between point x and the[Pg 445] auxiliary brush or brushes to adjust the sensitivity when the brushes are set up.

Fig. 264, 265.
Fig. 264.Fig. 265.

The accompanying sketches also illustrate improvements made by Mr. Tesla in the mechanical devices used to effect the shifting of the brushes, in the use of an auxiliary brush. Fig. 266 is an elevation of the regulator with the frame partly in section; and Fig. 267 is a section at the line x x, Fig. 266. C is the commutator; B and B', the brush-holders, B carrying the main brushes a a', and B' the auxiliary or shunt brushes b b. The axis of the brush-holder B is supported by two pivot-screws, p p. The other brush-holder, B', has a sleeve, d, and is movable around the axis of the brush-holder B. In this way both brush-holders can turn very freely, the friction of the parts being reduced to a minimum. Over the brush-holders is mounted the solenoid S, which rests upon a forked column, c. This column also affords a support for the pivots p p, and is fastened upon a solid bracket or projection, P, which extends from the base of the machine, and is cast in one piece with the same. The brush-holders B B' are connected by means of the links e e and the cross-piece F to the iron core I, which slides freely in the tube T of the solenoid. The iron core I has a screw, s, by means of which it can be raised and adjusted in its position relatively to the solenoid, so that the pull exerted upon it by the solenoid is practically uniform through the whole length of motion which is required to effect the regulation. In order to effect the adjustment with greater precision, the core I is provided with a small iron screw, s'. The core being first brought very nearly in the required position relatively to the solenoid by means of the screw s, the small screw s' is then adjusted until the magnetic attraction upon the core is the same when the core is in any position. A convenient stop, t, serves to limit the upward movement of the iron core.[Pg 446]

The accompanying sketches also show improvements made by Mr. Tesla in the mechanical devices used for shifting the brushes, including the use of an auxiliary brush. Fig. 266 is a side view of the regulator with part of the frame cut away; and Fig. 267 is a cross-section at the line x x, Fig. 266. C is the commutator; B and B' are the brush-holders, with B holding the main brushes a a' and B' holding the auxiliary or shunt brushes b b. The axis of the brush-holder B is supported by two pivot-screws, p p. The other brush-holder, B', has a sleeve, d, and can move around the axis of the brush-holder B. This design allows both brush-holders to rotate freely, minimizing friction between the parts. Above the brush-holders is the solenoid S, which rests on a forked column, c. This column also supports the pivots p p and is attached to a solid bracket or projection, P, that extends from the machine's base and is cast as one piece with it. The brush-holders B B' are connected by links e e and the cross-piece F to the iron core I, which can slide freely inside the tube T of the solenoid. The iron core I has a screw, s, allowing it to be lifted and adjusted relative to the solenoid, ensuring that the pull from the solenoid is nearly uniform throughout its entire range of motion needed for regulation. For more precise adjustments, the core I also has a small iron screw, s'. After positioning the core nearly where it needs to be using screw s, the small screw s' is adjusted until the magnetic attraction on the core remains the same in any position. A convenient stop, t, limits the upward movement of the iron core.[Pg 446]

To check somewhat the movement of the core I, a dash-pot, K, is used. The piston L of the dash-pot is provided with a valve, V, which opens by a downward pressure and allows an easy downward movement of the iron core I, but closes and checks the movement of the core when it is pulled up by the action of the solenoid.

To somewhat control the movement of the core I, a dash-pot, K, is utilized. The piston L of the dash-pot has a valve, V, that opens with downward pressure, allowing the iron core I to move down easily, but closes and stops the movement of the core when it is pulled up by the solenoid's action.

To balance the opposing forces, the weight of the moving parts, and the pull exerted by the solenoid upon the iron core, the weights W W may be used. The adjustment is such that when the solenoid is traversed by the normal current it is just strong enough to balance the downward pull of the parts.

To balance the opposing forces, the weight of the moving parts and the pull exerted by the solenoid on the iron core, the weights W W can be used. The adjustment is made so that when the solenoid carries the normal current, it’s just strong enough to counteract the downward pull of the parts.

Fig. 266, 267.
Fig. 266.Fig. 267.

The electrical circuit-connections are substantially the same as indicated in the previous diagrams, the solenoid being in series with the circuit when the translating devices are in series, and in shunt when the devices are in multiple arc. The operation of the device is as follows: When upon a decrease of the resistance of the circuit or for some other reason, the current is increased, the solenoid S gains in strength and pulls up the iron core I, thus shifting the main brushes in the direction of rotation and the auxiliary brushes in the opposite way. This diminishes the strength of the current until the opposing forces are balanced and the solenoid is traversed by the normal current; but if from any cause the current in the circuit is diminished, then the weight of the moving parts overcomes the pull of the solenoid, the iron[Pg 447] core I descends, thus shifting the brushes the opposite way and increasing the current to the normal strength. The dash-pot connected to the iron core I may be of ordinary construction; but it is better, especially in machines for arc lights, to provide the piston of the dash-pot with a valve, as indicated in the diagrams. This valve permits a comparatively easy downward movement of the iron core, but checks its movement when it is drawn up by the solenoid. Such an arrangement has the advantage that a great number of lights may be put on without diminishing the light-power of the lamps in the circuit, as the brushes assume at once the proper position. When lights are cut out, the dash-pot acts to retard the movement; but if the current is considerably increased the solenoid gets abnormally strong and the brushes are shifted instantly. The regulator being properly adjusted, lights or other devices may be put on or out with scarcely any perceptible difference. It is obvious that instead of the dash-pot any other retarding device may be used.

The electrical circuit connections are mostly the same as shown in the previous diagrams. The solenoid is in series with the circuit when the translating devices are in series and in parallel when the devices are in multiple arcs. Here’s how the device works: When the resistance of the circuit decreases or for some other reason the current increases, the solenoid S becomes stronger and pulls up the iron core I, moving the main brushes in the direction of rotation and the auxiliary brushes in the opposite direction. This reduces the strength of the current until the opposing forces balance out, and the solenoid carries the normal current. However, if the current in the circuit decreases for any reason, the weight of the moving parts overcomes the pull of the solenoid, causing the iron core I to go down, which shifts the brushes the other way and increases the current back to its normal strength. The dash-pot connected to the iron core I can be of regular design, but it's better, especially in machines for arc lights, to equip the piston of the dash-pot with a valve, as shown in the diagrams. This valve allows the iron core to move down easily but limits its movement when it's pulled up by the solenoid. This setup means that many lights can be added without reducing the brightness of the lamps in the circuit, as the brushes quickly find the right position. When lights are turned off, the dash-pot helps slow down the movement; however, if the current rises significantly, the solenoid becomes overly strong, and the brushes shift immediately. When the regulator is properly set, lights or other devices can be turned on or off with hardly any noticeable difference. It's clear that any other slowing device can be used instead of the dash-pot.


CHAPTER XXXIX.

Enhancements in Dynamo and Motor Design.

This invention of Mr. Tesla is an improvement in the construction of dynamo or magneto electric machines or motors, consisting in a novel form of frame and field magnet which renders the machine more solid and compact as a structure, which requires fewer parts, and which involves less trouble and expense in its manufacture. It is applicable to generators and motors generally, not only to those which have independent circuits adapted for use in the Tesla alternating current system, but to other continuous or alternating current machines of the ordinary type generally used.

This invention by Mr. Tesla is an upgrade in the design of dynamo or magneto electric machines or motors. It features a new type of frame and field magnet that makes the machine more sturdy and compact in structure, needing fewer components and resulting in less hassle and cost during production. This design can be applied to generators and motors broadly, not just those with independent circuits suited for the Tesla alternating current system, but also to other standard continuous or alternating current machines.

Fig. 268 shows the machine in side elevation. Fig. 269 is a vertical sectional view of the field magnets and frame and an end view of the armature; and Fig. 270 is a plan view of one of the parts of the frame and the armature, a portion of the latter being cut away.

Fig. 268 shows the machine from the side. Fig. 269 is a vertical cross-section of the field magnets and frame, along with an end view of the armature; and Fig. 270 is a top view of one of the frame parts and the armature, with part of the latter removed.

The field magnets and frame are cast in two parts. These parts are identical in size and shape, and each consists of the solid plates or ends A B, from which project inwardly the cores C D and the side bars or bridge pieces, E F. The precise shape of these parts is largely a matter of choice—that is to say, each casting, as shown, forms an approximately rectangular frame; but it might obviously be more or less oval, round, or square, without departure from the invention. It is also desirable to reduce the width of the side bars, E F, at the center and to so proportion the parts that when the frame is put together the spaces between the pole pieces will be practically equal to the arcs which the surfaces of the poles occupy.

The field magnets and frame are made in two parts. These parts are the same size and shape, and each is made up of solid plates or ends A B, from which the cores C D and the side bars or bridge pieces E F extend inward. The exact shape of these parts is mostly a matter of preference—in other words, each casting forms an approximately rectangular frame, but it could easily be slightly oval, round, or square without changing the invention. It’s also helpful to narrow the width of the side bars E F in the center and to proportion the parts so that when the frame is assembled, the gaps between the pole pieces are nearly equal to the arcs the surfaces of the poles cover.

The bearings G for the armature shaft are cast in the side bars E F. The field coils are either wound on the pole pieces or on a form and then slipped on over the ends of the pole pieces. The lower part or casting is secured to the base after being finished off. The armature K on its shaft is then mounted in[Pg 449] the bearings of the lower casting and the other part of the frame placed in position, dowel pins L or any other means being used to secure the two parts in proper position.

The bearings G for the armature shaft are cast into the side bars E F. The field coils are either wound directly onto the pole pieces or wrapped around a form that’s then slid over the ends of the pole pieces. The lower section or casting is attached to the base after it's finished. The armature K on its shaft is then installed in the bearings of the lower casting, and the other part of the frame is positioned, using dowel pins L or any other method to secure the two parts in the correct position.

Fig. 268. Fig. 268. Fig. 269. Fig. 269. Fig. 270. Fig. 270.

In order to secure an easier fit, the side bars E F, and end pieces, A B, are so cast that slots M are formed when the two parts are put together.[Pg 450]

To ensure a better fit, the side bars E F and end pieces A B are designed with slots M that are created when the two parts are assembled.[Pg 450]

This machine possesses several advantages. For example, if we magnetize the cores alternately, as indicated by the characters N S, it will be seen that the magnetic circuit between the poles of each part of a casting is completed through the solid iron side bars. The bearings for the shaft are located at the neutral points of the field, so that the armature core is not affected by the magnetic condition of the field.

This machine has several advantages. For instance, if we alternate the magnetization of the cores, as shown by the characters N S, we can see that the magnetic circuit between the poles of each part of a casting is completed through the solid iron side bars. The bearings for the shaft are placed at the neutral points of the field, so the armature core isn't influenced by the magnetic condition of the field.

The improvement is not restricted to the use of four pole pieces, as it is evident that each pole piece could be divided or more than four formed by the shape of the casting.

The improvement isn’t just limited to using four pole pieces; it’s clear that each pole piece could be divided, or more than four could be created based on the shape of the casting.


CHAPTER XL.

Tesla Direct Current Arc Lighting System.

At one time, soon after his arrival in America, Mr. Tesla was greatly interested in the subject of arc lighting, which then occupied public attention and readily enlisted the support of capital. He therefore worked out a system which was confided to a company formed for its exploitation, and then proceeded to devote his energies to the perfection of the details of his more celebrated "rotary field" motor system. The Tesla arc lighting apparatus appeared at a time when a great many other lamps and machines were in the market, but it commanded notice by its ingenuity. Its chief purpose was to lessen the manufacturing cost and simplify the processes of operation.

At one point, shortly after he arrived in America, Mr. Tesla became very interested in arc lighting, which was a hot topic at the time and easily attracted investors. He developed a system that was handed over to a company created to implement it, and then he focused his efforts on perfecting the details of his more famous "rotary field" motor system. The Tesla arc lighting device came out when many other lamps and machines were available, but it caught attention due to its clever design. Its main goal was to reduce manufacturing costs and simplify operating procedures.

We will take up the dynamo first. Fig. 271 is a longitudinal section, and Fig. 272 a cross section of the machine. Fig. 273 is a top view, and Fig. 274 a side view of the magnetic frame. Fig. 275 is an end view of the commutator bars, and Fig. 276 is a section of the shaft and commutator bars. Fig. 277 is a diagram illustrating the coils of the armature and the connections to the commutator plates.

We will start with the dynamo. Fig. 271 is a side view, and Fig. 272 is a cross-section of the machine. Fig. 273 shows a top view, and Fig. 274 presents a side view of the magnetic frame. Fig. 275 is a view of the commutator bars from the end, and Fig. 276 shows a section of the shaft and commutator bars. Fig. 277 is a diagram that illustrates the coils of the armature and how they connect to the commutator plates.

The cores c c c c of the field-magnets are tapering in both directions, as shown, for the purposes of concentrating the magnetism upon the middle of the pole-pieces.

The cores c c c c of the field magnets are narrowing in both directions, as shown, to focus the magnetism on the center of the pole pieces.

The connecting-frame F F of the field-magnets is in the form indicated in the side view, Fig. 274, the lower part being provided with the spreading curved cast legs e e, so that the machine will rest firmly upon two base-bars, r r.

The connecting frame F F of the field magnets has the shape shown in the side view, Fig. 274, with the lower part featuring the spreading curved cast legs e e, allowing the machine to rest securely on two base bars, r r.

To the lower pole, S, of the field-magnet M is fastened, by means of babbitt or other fusible diamagnetic material, the base B, which is provided with bearings b for the armature-shaft H. The base B has a projection, P, which supports the brush-holders and the regulating devices, which are of a special character devised by Mr. Tesla.

To the lower pole, S, of the field magnet M, the base B is attached using babbitt or another fusible diamagnetic material. This base B has bearings b for the armature shaft H. Additionally, the base B features a projection, P, that supports the brush holders and the regulating devices, which were specially designed by Mr. Tesla.

The armature is constructed with the view to reduce to a min[Pg 452]imum the loss of power due to Foucault currents and to the change of polarity, and also to shorten as much as possible the length of the inactive wire wound upon the armature core.

The armature is designed to minimize power loss from eddy currents and changes in polarity, and to shorten the length of the inactive wire wound around the armature core as much as possible.[Pg 452]

Fig. 271. Fig. 271.

It is well known that when the armature is revolved between the poles of the field-magnets, currents are generated in the iron body of the armature which develop heat, and consequently cause a waste of power. Owing to the mutual action of the lines of force, the magnetic properties of iron, and the speed of the different portions of the armature core, these currents are generated principally on and near the surface of the armature core, diminishing in strength gradually toward the centre of the core. Their quantity is under some conditions proportional to the length of the iron body in the direction in which these currents are generated. By subdividing the iron core electrically in this direction, the generation of these currents can be reduced to a great extent. For instance, if the length of the armature-core is twelve inches, and by a suitable construction it is subdivided electrically, so that there are in the generating direction six inches of iron and six inches of intervening air-spaces or insulating material, the waste currents will be reduced to fifty per cent.

It's well known that when the armature spins between the poles of the field magnets, currents are generated in the iron body of the armature that produce heat, leading to energy loss. Due to the interaction of magnetic force lines, the magnetic properties of iron, and the speed of different parts of the armature core, these currents primarily form on and near the surface of the armature core, gradually decreasing in strength toward the center. The amount of these currents can be proportional to the length of the iron body in the direction they are generated under certain conditions. By electrically subdividing the iron core in this direction, the generation of these currents can be significantly reduced. For example, if the armature core is twelve inches long, and through a suitable design, it is electrically subdivided so that there are six inches of iron and six inches of air gaps or insulating material in the generating direction, the waste currents will be cut down to fifty percent.

As shown in the diagrams, the armature is constructed of thin iron discs D D D, of various diameters, fastened upon the armature-shaft in a suitable manner and arranged according to their sizes, so that a series of iron bodies, i i i, is formed, each of which diminishes in thickness from the centre toward the periphery. At both ends of the armature the inwardly curved discs d d, of cast iron, are fastened to the armature shaft.

As shown in the diagrams, the armature is made up of thin iron discs D D D of different diameters, attached to the armature shaft in an appropriate way and arranged by size, creating a series of iron pieces, i i i, each getting thinner from the center to the edge. At both ends of the armature, inwardly curved discs d d made of cast iron are mounted on the armature shaft.

The armature core being constructed as shown, it will be easily seen that on those portions of the armature that are the most remote from the axis, and where the currents are principally developed, the length of iron in the generating direction is only a[Pg 453] small fraction of the total length of the armature core, and besides this the iron body is subdivided in the generating direction, and therefore the Foucault currents are greatly reduced. Another cause of heating is the shifting of the poles of the armature core. In consequence of the subdivision of the iron in the armature and the increased surface for radiation, the risk of heating is lessened.

The armature core being built as shown, it’s clear that in the parts of the armature farthest from the axis, where the currents are mainly generated, the length of iron in the generating direction is only a [Pg 453] small fraction of the total length of the armature core. Also, the iron is divided in the generating direction, which significantly reduces the Foucault currents. Another reason for heating is the movement of the armature core's poles. Because the iron in the armature is subdivided and there’s more surface area for heat to escape, the chance of overheating is decreased.

The iron discs D D D are insulated or coated with some insulating-paint, a very careful insulation being unnecessary, as an electrical contact between several discs can only occur at places where the generated currents are comparatively weak. An armature core constructed in the manner described may be revolved between the poles of the field magnets without showing the slightest increase of temperature.

The iron discs D D D are insulated or coated with some insulating paint. There's no need for super careful insulation since electrical contact between the discs can only happen in spots where the generated currents are fairly weak. An armature core built this way can spin between the poles of the field magnets without any noticeable increase in temperature.

Fig. 272, 273.
Fig. 272.Fig. 273.

The end discs, d d, which are of sufficient thickness and, for the sake of cheapness, of cast-iron, are curved inwardly, as indicated in the drawings. The extent of the curve is dependent on the amount of wire to be wound upon the armatures. In this machine the wire is wound upon the armature in two superimposed parts, and the curve of the end discs, d d, is so calculated that the first part—that is, practically half of the wire—just fills up the hollow space to the line x x; or, if the wire is wound in any other manner, the curve is such that when the whole of the wire is wound, the outside mass of wires, w, and the inside mass of wires, w', are equal at each side of the plane x x. In this case the passive or electrically-inactive wires are of the smallest length practicable. The arrangement has further the advantage[Pg 454] that the total lengths of the crossing wires at the two sides of the plane x x are practically equal.

The end discs, d d, are thick enough and made of cast iron to keep costs down, and they curve inward as shown in the drawings. The degree of the curve depends on how much wire needs to be wound onto the armatures. In this machine, the wire is wound around the armature in two layers, and the curve of the end discs, d d, is designed so that the first layer—essentially half of the wire—perfectly fills the empty space up to the line x x; or, if the wire is wound differently, the curve ensures that when all the wire is wound, the outer group of wires, w, and the inner group of wires, w', are equal on both sides of the plane x x. In this setup, the inactive or non-electrically-active wires have the shortest length possible. Additionally, this arrangement makes sure[Pg 454] that the total lengths of the crossing wires on both sides of the plane x x are almost the same.

Fig. 274. Fig. 274.

To equalize further the armature coils at both sides of the plates that are in contact with the brushes, the winding and connecting up is effected in the following manner: The whole wire is wound upon the armature-core in two superimposed parts, which are thoroughly insulated from each other. Each of these two parts is composed of three separated groups of coils. The first group of coils of the first part of wire being wound and connected to the commutator-bars in the usual manner, this group is insulated and the second group wound; but the coils of this second group, instead of being connected to the next following commutator bars, are connected to the directly opposite bars of the commutator. The second group is then insulated and the third group wound, the coils of this group being connected to those bars to which they would be connected in the usual way. The wires are then thoroughly insulated and the second part of wire is wound and connected in the same manner.

To balance the armature coils on both sides of the plates that make contact with the brushes, the winding and connection are done as follows: The entire wire is wound on the armature core in two layered sections, which are completely insulated from each other. Each of these sections consists of three separate groups of coils. The first group of coils in the first section is wound and connected to the commutator bars in the usual way. This group is insulated, and then the second group is wound; however, instead of connecting the coils of this second group to the next following commutator bars, they are connected to the directly opposite bars of the commutator. The second group is then insulated, and the third group is wound, with the coils of this group being connected to the bars in the standard way. The wires are then thoroughly insulated, and the second section of wire is wound and connected in the same manner.

Suppose, for instance, that there are twenty-four coils—that is, twelve in each part—and consequently twenty-four commutator plates. There will be in each part three groups, each containing four coils, and the coils will be connected as follows:

Suppose, for example, that there are twenty-four coils—that is, twelve in each part—and thus twenty-four commutator plates. In each part, there will be three groups, each containing four coils, and the coils will be connected like this:

Groups.    Commutator Bars.
 
First1—5
First part of wireSecond17—21
Third9—13
 
First13—17
Second part of wire     Second   5—9
Third21—1

In constructing the armature core and winding and connecting the coils in the manner indicated, the passive or electrically in[Pg 455]active wire is reduced to a minimum, and the coils at each side of the plates that are in contact with the brushes are practically equal. In this way the electrical efficiency of the machine is increased.

In building the armature core and winding and connecting the coils as shown, the passive or electrically inactive wire is minimized, and the coils on each side of the plates that touch the brushes are almost equal. This approach boosts the electrical efficiency of the machine.

Fig. 275, 276.
Fig. 275.Fig. 276.

The commutator plates t are shown as outside the bearing b of the armature shaft. The shaft H is tubular and split at the end portion, and the wires are carried through the same in the usual manner and connected to the respective commutator plates. The commutator plates are upon a cylinder, u, and insulated, and this cylinder is properly placed and then secured by expanding the split end of the shaft by a tapering screw plug, v.

The commutator plates t are positioned outside the bearing b of the armature shaft. The shaft H is tubular and split at the end, with the wires running through it in the usual way and connected to the respective commutator plates. The commutator plates are mounted on a cylinder, u, which is insulated, and this cylinder is correctly positioned and secured by expanding the split end of the shaft with a tapered screw plug, v.

Fig. 277. Fig. 277.

The arc lamps invented by Mr. Tesla for use on the circuits from the above described dynamo are those in which the separation and feed of the carbon electrodes or their equivalents is accomplished by means of electro-magnets or solenoids in connection with suitable clutch mechanism, and were designed for the purpose[Pg 456] of remedying certain faults common to arc lamps.

The arc lamps invented by Mr. Tesla for use with the previously described dynamo are designed where the separation and feeding of the carbon electrodes or their equivalents are done using electromagnets or solenoids connected to an appropriate clutch mechanism. They were created to address specific issues commonly found in arc lamps.[Pg 456]

He proposed to prevent the frequent vibrations of the movable carbon "point" and flickering of the light arising therefrom; to prevent the falling into contact of the carbons; to dispense with the dash pot, clock work, or gearing and similar devices; to render the lamp extremely sensitive, and to feed the carbon almost imperceptibly, and thereby obtain a very steady and uniform light.

He suggested preventing the frequent vibrations of the movable carbon "point" and the flickering light that comes from it; stopping the carbons from touching each other; eliminating the need for a dash pot, clockwork, gears, and similar devices; making the lamp extremely sensitive; and feeding the carbon almost imperceptibly, to achieve a very steady and uniform light.

In that class of lamps where the regulation of the arc is effected by forces acting in opposition on a free, movable rod or lever directly connected with the electrode, all or some of the forces being dependent on the strength of the current, any change in the electrical condition of the circuit causes a vibration and a corresponding flicker in the light. This difficulty is most apparent when there are only a few lamps in circuit. To lessen this difficulty lamps have been constructed in which the lever or armature, after the establishing of the arc, is kept in a fixed position and cannot vibrate during the feed operation, the feed mechanism acting independently; but in these lamps, when a clamp is employed, it frequently occurs that the carbons come into contact and the light is momentarily extinguished, and frequently parts of the circuit are injured. In both these classes of lamps it has been customary to use dash pot, clock work, or equivalent retarding devices; but these are often unreliable and objectionable, and increase the cost of construction.

In that category of lamps where the arc is regulated by opposing forces acting on a free, movable rod or lever directly connected to the electrode, and where some of these forces depend on the current strength, any change in the electrical condition of the circuit leads to a vibration and a corresponding flicker in the light. This issue is most noticeable when there are only a few lamps in the circuit. To reduce this problem, lamps have been designed where the lever or armature, once the arc is established, remains in a fixed position and doesn’t vibrate during the feed operation, allowing the feed mechanism to work independently; however, in these lamps, when a clamp is used, the carbons often touch, resulting in a momentary extinguishing of the light, and parts of the circuit can be damaged. In both types of lamps, it has been common to use dash pots, clockwork, or other equivalent damping devices; yet, these are often unreliable and undesirable, increasing manufacturing costs.

Mr. Tesla combines two electro-magnets—one of low resistance in the main or lamp circuit, and the other of comparatively high resistance in a shunt around the arc—a movable armature lever, and a special feed mechanism, the parts being arranged so that in the normal working position of the armature lever the same is kept almost rigidly in one position, and is not affected even by considerable changes in the electric circuit; but if the carbons fall into contact the armature will be actuated by the magnets so as to move the lever and start the arc, and hold the carbons until the arc lengthens and the armature lever returns to the normal position. After this the carbon rod holder is released by the action of the feed mechanism, so as to feed the carbon and restore the arc to its normal length.

Mr. Tesla combines two electromagnets—one with low resistance in the main or lamp circuit and the other with relatively high resistance in a shunt around the arc—along with a movable armature lever and a special feed mechanism. The parts are arranged so that in the normal working position of the armature lever, it remains almost completely fixed in one position, unaffected even by significant changes in the electric circuit. However, if the carbon rods touch, the armature will be activated by the magnets, moving the lever to start the arc and holding the carbons until the arc lengthens and the armature lever returns to the normal position. After that, the carbon rod holder is released by the action of the feed mechanism, allowing it to feed the carbon and restore the arc to its normal length.

Fig. 278 is an elevation of the mechanism made use of in this arc lamp. Fig. 279 is a plan view. Fig. 280 is an elevation of the balancing lever and spring; Fig. 281 is a de[Pg 457]tached plan view of the pole pieces and armatures upon the friction clamp, and Fig. 282 is a section of the clamping tube.

Fig. 278 shows the side view of the mechanism used in this arc lamp. Fig. 279 is a top view. Fig. 280 provides a side view of the balancing lever and spring; Fig. 281 is a detached top view of the pole pieces and armatures on the friction clamp, and Fig. 282 is a cross-section of the clamping tube.

M is a helix of coarse wire in a circuit from the lower carbon holder to the negative binding screw −. N is a helix of fine wire in a shunt between the positive binding screw + and the negative binding screw −. The upper carbon holder S is a parallel rod sliding through the plates S' S2 of the frame of the lamp, and hence the electric current passes from the positive binding post + through the plate S2, carbon holder S, and upper carbon to the lower carbon, and thence by the holder and a metallic connection to the helix M.

M is a coil of thick wire in a circuit running from the lower carbon holder to the negative binding screw −. N is a coil of thin wire in a shunt connecting the positive binding screw + and the negative binding screw −. The upper carbon holder S is a parallel rod that slides through the plates S' S2 of the lamp's frame, allowing the electric current to flow from the positive binding post + through the plate S2, carbon holder S, and upper carbon to the lower carbon, and then through the holder and a metal connection to the coil M.

Fig. 278, 282.
Fig. 278.Fig. 282.
Fig. 279.
Fig. 279.
Fig. 280.
Fig. 280.
Fig. 281.
Fig. 281.

The carbon holders are of the usual character, and to insure electric connections the springs l are made use of to grasp the upper carbon holding rod S, but to allow the rod to slide freely through the same. These springs l may be adjusted in their pressure by the screw m, and the spring l maybe sustained upon[Pg 458] any suitable support. They are shown as connected with the upper end of the core of the magnet N.

The carbon holders are pretty standard, and to ensure proper electrical connections, the springs l are used to grip the upper carbon holding rod S, while still letting the rod slide freely through them. These springs l can be adjusted for pressure using the screw m, and the spring l can be rested on[Pg 458] any suitable support. They are shown connected to the upper end of the magnet's core N.

Around the carbon-holding rod S, between the plates S' S2, there is a tube, R, which forms a clamp. This tube is counter-bored, as seen in the section Fig. 282, so that it bears upon the rod S at its upper end and near the middle, and at the lower end of this tubular clamp R there are armature segments r of soft iron. A frame or arm, n, extending, preferably, from the core N2, supports the lever A by a fulcrum-pin, o. This lever A has a hole, through which the upper end of the tubular clamp R passes freely, and from the lever A is a link, q, to the lever t, which lever is pivoted at y to a ring upon one of the columns S3. This lever t has an opening or bow surrounding the tubular clamp R, and there are pins or pivotal connections w between the lever t and this clamp R, and a spring, r2, serves to support or suspend the weight of the parts and balance them, or nearly so. This spring is adjustable.

Around the carbon-holding rod S, between the plates S' S2, there’s a tube, R, that acts as a clamp. This tube is counter-bored, as shown in section Fig. 282, so that it rests on the rod S at its upper end and near the middle. At the lower end of this tubular clamp R, there are armature segments r made of soft iron. A frame or arm, n, preferably extends from the core N2, supporting the lever A by a fulcrum pin, o. This lever A has a hole through which the upper end of the tubular clamp R passes freely, and from lever A is a link, q, connecting it to lever t, which is pivoted at y to a ring on one of the columns S3. This lever t has an opening or bow that wraps around the tubular clamp R, and there are pins or pivot connections w between lever t and this clamp R. A spring, r2, helps support or suspend the weight of the parts, balancing them, or nearly so. This spring is adjustable.

At one end of the lever A is a soft-iron armature block, a, over the core M' of the helix M, and there is a limiting screw, c, passing through this armature block a, and at the other end of the lever A is a soft iron armature block, b, with the end tapering or wedge shaped, and the same comes close to and in line with the lateral projection e on the core N2. The lower ends of the cores M' N2 are made with laterally projecting pole-pieces M3 N3, respectively, and these pole-pieces are concave at their outer ends, and are at opposite sides of the armature segments r at the lower end of the tubular clamp R.

At one end of the lever A is a soft-iron armature block, a, positioned over the core M' of the helix M. There is also a limiting screw, c, that passes through this armature block a. At the other end of the lever A is another soft iron armature block, b, with a tapering or wedge-shaped end that aligns closely with the lateral projection e on the core N2. The lower ends of the cores M' N2 have laterally projecting pole pieces M3 N3, which are concave at their outer ends and located on opposite sides of the armature segments r at the lower end of the tubular clamp R.

The operation of these devices is as follows: In the condition of inaction, the upper carbon rests upon the lower one, and when the electric current is turned on it passes freely, by the frame and spring l, through the rods and carbons to the coarse wire and helix M, and to the negative binding post V and the core M' thereby is energized. The pole piece M3 attracts the armature r, and by the lateral pressure causes the clamp R to grasp the rod S', and the lever A is simultaneously moved from the position shown by dotted lines, Fig. 278, to the normal position shown in full lines, and in so doing the link q and lever t are raised, lifting the clamp R and S, separating the carbons and forming the arc. The magnetism of the pole piece e tends to hold the lever A level, or nearly so, the core N2 being energized by the current in the shunt which contains the helix N. In this position the lever A is not[Pg 459] moved by any ordinary variation in the current, because the armature b is strongly attracted by the magnetism of e, and these parts are close to each other, and the magnetism of e acts at right angles to the magnetism of the core M'. If, now, the arc becomes too long, the current through the helix M is lessened, and the magnetism of the core N3 is increased by the greater current passing through the shunt, and this core N3, attracting the segmental armature r, lessens the hold of the clamp R upon the rod S, allowing the latter to slide and lessen the length of the arc, which instantly restores the magnetic equilibrium and causes the clamp R to hold the rod S. If it happens that the carbons fall into contact, then the magnetism of N2 is lessened so much that the attraction of the magnet M will be sufficient to move the armature a and lever A so that the armature b passes above the normal position, so as to separate the carbons instantly; but when the carbons burn away, a greater amount of current will pass through the shunt until the attraction of the core N2 will overcome the attraction of the core M' and bring the armature lever A again into the normal horizontal position, and this occurs before the feed can take place. The segmental armature pieces r are shown as nearly semicircular. They are square or of any other desired shape, the ends of the pole pieces M3, N3 being made to correspond in shape.

The operation of these devices works like this: When inactive, the upper carbon sits on the lower one, and when the electric current is turned on, it flows freely through the frame and spring l, through the rods and carbons to the thick wire and helix M, then to the negative binding post V and energizes the core M'. The pole piece M3 pulls the armature r, and the lateral pressure causes the clamp R to grip the rod S'. Simultaneously, the lever A moves from the dotted line position shown in Fig. 278 to the normal position indicated by the solid lines. In doing so, the link q and lever t are lifted, raising the clamp R and S, separating the carbons and creating the arc. The magnetism of the pole piece e helps keep the lever A level, or nearly so, with the core N2 being energized by the current in the shunt containing helix N. In this position, the lever A isn’t affected by any typical changes in the current because the armature b is strongly attracted by the magnetism of e, and they are close together, while the magnetism of e acts perpendicular to the magnetism of the core M'. If the arc gets too long, the current through the helix M decreases, boosting the magnetism of the core N3 due to the higher current flowing through the shunt. This core N3, which attracts the segmental armature r, reduces the clamp R's grip on the rod S, allowing it to slide and shorten the arc. This quickly restores the magnetic balance and causes the clamp R to hold the rod S. If the carbons touch, the magnetism of N2 decreases enough that the attraction of magnet M can move the armature a and lever A so that armature b goes above normal, separating the carbons instantly. However, as the carbons burn away, more current will flow through the shunt until the core N2 pulls more strongly than the core M', bringing the armature lever A back to the normal horizontal position, which happens before feeding can occur. The segmental armature pieces r are shaped almost like semicircles. They can be square or any other shape desired, with the ends of the pole pieces M3, N3 shaped accordingly.

In a modification of this lamp, Mr. Tesla provided means for automatically withdrawing a lamp from the circuit, or cutting it out when, from a failure of the feed, the arc reached an abnormal length; and also means for automatically reinserting such lamp in the circuit when the rod drops and the carbons come into contact.

In an update to this lamp, Mr. Tesla added a way to automatically pull the lamp out of the circuit or disconnect it when, due to a power failure, the arc became too long; and he also included a way to automatically put the lamp back into the circuit when the rod drops and the carbon rods touch.

Fig. 283 is an elevation of the lamp with the case in section. Fig. 284 is a sectional plan at the line x x. Fig. 285 is an elevation, partly in section, of the lamp at right angles to Fig. 283. Fig. 286 is a sectional plan at the line y y of Fig. 283. Fig. 287 is a section of the clamp in about full size. Fig. 288 is a detached section illustrating the connection of the spring to the lever that carries the pivots of the clamp, and Fig. 289 is a diagram showing the circuit-connections of the lamp.

Fig. 283 shows a side view of the lamp with the case cut open. Fig. 284 is a cross-section at line x x. Fig. 285 is a side view, partly cut away, of the lamp from a different angle than Fig. 283. Fig. 286 is a cross-section at line y y of Fig. 283. Fig. 287 is a section of the clamp at nearly full size. Fig. 288 is a separate section showing how the spring connects to the lever that holds the clamp's pivots, and Fig. 289 is a diagram displaying the circuit connections of the lamp.

In Fig. 283, M represents the main and N the shunt magnet, both securely fastened to the base A, which with its side columns, S S, are cast in one piece of brass or other diamagnetic material. To the magnets are soldered or otherwise fastened the brass washers or discs a a a a. Similar washers, b b, of fibre or other insu[Pg 460]lating material, serve to insulate the wires from the brass washers.

In Fig. 283, M represents the main magnet and N the shunt magnet, both securely attached to the base A, which, along with its side columns S S, is made from a single piece of brass or another non-magnetic material. Brass washers or discs a a a a are either soldered or otherwise attached to the magnets. Similar washers b b, made of fiber or another insulating material, are used to keep the wires separated from the brass washers.

The magnets M and N are made very flat, so that their width exceeds three times their thickness, or even more. In this way a comparatively small number of convolutions is sufficient to produce the required magnetism, while a greater surface is offered for cooling off the wires.

The magnets M and N are designed to be very flat, with their width being more than three times their thickness, or even more. This allows for a relatively small number of coils to generate the needed magnetism, while also providing a larger surface area for the wires to cool down.

Fig. 286, 283.
Fig. 286.Fig. 283.
Fig. 285.
Fig. 285.
Fig. 287, 288.
Fig. 287.Fig. 288.
Fig. 284.
Fig. 284.

The upper pole pieces, m n, of the magnets are curved, as indicated in the drawings, Fig. 283. The lower pole pieces m' n', are brought near together, tapering toward the armature g, as shown in Figs. 284 and 286. The object of this taper is to concentrate the greatest amount of the developed magnetism upon the armature, and also to allow the pull to be exerted always upon the middle of the armature g. This armature g is a piece of iron[Pg 461] in the shape of a hollow cylinder, having on each side a segment cut away, the width of which is equal to the width of the pole pieces m' n'.

The upper pole pieces, m n, of the magnets are curved, as shown in the drawings, Fig. 283. The lower pole pieces m' n' are brought closer together, tapering toward the armature g, as depicted in Figs. 284 and 286. The purpose of this taper is to focus the maximum amount of magnetism on the armature and to ensure that the pull is always applied to the center of the armature g. This armature g is made of iron[Pg 461] shaped like a hollow cylinder, with a segment cut away on each side, the width of which matches the width of the pole pieces m' n'.

The armature is soldered or otherwise fastened to the clamp r, which is formed of a brass tube, provided with gripping-jaws e e, Fig. 287. These jaws are arcs of a circle of the diameter of the rod R, and are made of hardened German silver. The guides f f, through which the carbon-holding rod R slides, are made of the same material. This has the advantage of reducing greatly the wear and corrosion of the parts coming in frictional contact with the rod, which frequently causes trouble. The jaws e e are fastened to the inside of the tube r, so that one is a little lower than the other. The object of this is to provide a greater opening for the passage of the rod when the same is released by the clamp. The clamp r is supported on bearings w w, Figs. 283, 285 and 287, which are just in the middle between the jaws e e. The bearings w w are carried by a lever, t, one end of which rests upon an adjustable support, q, of the side columns, S, the other end being connected by means of the link e' to the armature-lever L. The armature-lever L is a flat piece of iron in N shape, having its ends curved so as to correspond to the form of the upper pole-pieces of the magnets M and N. It is hung upon the pivots v v, Fig. 284, which are in the jaw x of the top plate B. This plate B, with the jaw, is cast in one piece and screwed to the side columns, S S, that extend up from the base A. To partly balance the overweight of the moving parts, a spring, s', Figs. 284 and 288, is fastened to the top plate, B, and hooked to the lever t. The hook o is toward one side of the lever or bent a little sidewise, as seen in Fig. 288. By this means a slight tendency is given to swing the armature toward the pole-piece m' of the main magnet.

The armature is soldered or attached to the clamp r, which is made from a brass tube with gripping jaws e e, as shown in Fig. 287. These jaws are arcs of a circle that match the diameter of the rod R and are made from hardened German silver. The guides f f, through which the carbon-holding rod R slides, are made from the same material. This helps significantly reduce wear and corrosion on the parts that come into contact with the rod, which often causes issues. The jaws e e are attached to the inside of the tube r, with one positioned slightly lower than the other. This design creates a larger opening for the rod to pass through when it is released by the clamp. The clamp r is supported by bearings w w, Figs. 283, 285, and 287, located right in the middle between the jaws e e. The bearings w w are held by a lever, t, one end of which rests on an adjustable support, q, from the side columns, S, while the other end connects via the link e' to the armature-lever L. The armature-lever L is a flat piece of iron shaped like an N, with its ends curved to match the shape of the upper pole-pieces of the magnets M and N. It pivots on the pivots v v, Fig. 284, which are in the jaw x of the top plate B. This plate B, along with the jaw, is cast as a single piece and screwed to the side columns, S S, that rise from the base A. To help balance the weight of the moving parts, a spring, s', Figs. 284 and 288, is attached to the top plate, B, and hooked to the lever t. The hook o is positioned toward one side of the lever or slightly bent sideways, as shown in Fig. 288. This setup gives a slight tilt to swing the armature toward the pole-piece m' of the main magnet.

The binding-posts K K' are screwed to the base A. A manual switch, for short-circuiting the lamp when the carbons are renewed, is also fastened to the base. This switch is of ordinary character, and is not shown in the drawings.

The binding posts K K' are attached to the base A with screws. There’s a manual switch for short-circuiting the lamp when the carbons are replaced, which is also secured to the base. This switch is a standard type and isn’t depicted in the drawings.

The rod R is electrically connected to the lamp-frame by means of a flexible conductor or otherwise. The lamp-case receives a removable cover, s2, to inclose the parts.

The rod R is electrically connected to the lamp frame using a flexible wire or a similar method. The lamp case has a removable cover, s2, to enclose the components.

The electrical connections are as indicated diagrammatically in Fig. 289. The wire in the main magnet consists of two parts, x' and p'. These two parts may be in two separated coils or in[Pg 462] one single helix, as shown in the drawings. The part x' being normally in circuit, is, with the fine wire upon the shunt-magnet, wound and traversed by the current in the same direction, so as to tend to produce similar poles, N N or S S, on the corresponding pole-pieces of the magnets M and N. The part p' is only in circuit when the lamp is cut out, and then the current being in the opposite direction produces in the main magnet, magnetism of the opposite polarity.

The electrical connections are shown in Fig. 289. The wire in the main magnet consists of two parts, x' and p'. These two parts can either be in separate coils or in one single helix, as illustrated in the drawings. The part x', which is normally in the circuit, is wound together with the fine wire on the shunt-magnet, and the current flows through it in the same direction, creating similar poles, N N or S S, on the corresponding pole-pieces of magnets M and N. The part p' is only in the circuit when the lamp is disconnected, and then the current flows in the opposite direction, creating magnetism of the opposite polarity in the main magnet.

The operation is as follows: At the start the carbons are to be in contact, and the current passes from the positive binding-post K to the lamp-frame, carbon-holder, upper and lower carbon, insulated return-wire in one of the side rods, and from there through the part x' of the wire on the main magnet to the negative binding-post. Upon the passage of the current the main magnet is energized and attracts the clamping-armature g, swinging the clamp and gripping the rod by means of the gripping jaws e e. At the same time the armature lever L is pulled down and the carbons are separated. In pulling down the armature lever L the main magnet is assisted by the shunt-magnet N, the latter being magnetized by magnetic induction from the magnet M.

The operation is as follows: First, the carbons need to be in contact, and the current flows from the positive binding post K to the lamp frame, carbon holder, upper and lower carbon, insulated return wire in one of the side rods, and then through part x' of the wire on the main magnet to the negative binding post. When the current passes through, the main magnet gets energized and attracts the clamping armature g, which swings the clamp and grips the rod using the gripping jaws e e. At the same time, the armature lever L is pulled down, separating the carbons. While pulling down the armature lever L, the main magnet is assisted by the shunt magnet N, which gets magnetized by magnetic induction from the magnet M.

Fig. 289. Fig. 289.

It will be seen that the armatures L and g are practically the keepers for the magnets M and N, and owing to this fact both magnets with either one of the armatures L and g may be considered as one horseshoe magnet, which we might term a "compound magnet." The whole of the soft-iron parts M, m', g, n', N and L form a compound magnet.[Pg 463]

It can be seen that the armatures L and g essentially serve as the connectors for the magnets M and N. Because of this, both magnets, along with either armature L or g, can be viewed as a single horseshoe magnet, which we can call a "compound magnet." All the soft iron components M, m', g, n', N, and L together form a compound magnet.[Pg 463]

The carbons being separated, the fine wire receives a portion of the current. Now, the magnetic induction from the magnet M is such as to produce opposite poles on the corresponding ends of the magnet N; but the current traversing the helices tends to produce similar poles on the corresponding ends of both magnets, and therefore as soon as the fine wire is traversed by sufficient current the magnetism of the whole compound magnet is diminished.

The carbon rods are separated, and the thin wire picks up part of the current. At this point, the magnetic field from magnet M causes opposite poles to form at the ends of magnet N; however, the current flowing through the coils creates similar poles at the ends of both magnets. As a result, once the thin wire carries enough current, the overall magnetism of the combined magnet decreases.

With regard to the armature g and the operation of the lamp, the pole m' may be considered as the "clamping" and the pole n' as the "releasing" pole.

With respect to the armature g and how the lamp works, the pole m' can be seen as the "clamping" pole and the pole n' as the "releasing" pole.

As the carbons burn away, the fine wire receives more current and the magnetism diminishes in proportion. This causes the armature lever L to swing and the armature g to descend gradually under the weight of the moving parts until the end p, Fig. 283, strikes a stop on the top plate, B. The adjustment is such that when this takes place the rod R is yet gripped securely by the jaws e e. The further downward movement of the armature lever being prevented, the arc becomes longer as the carbons are consumed, and the compound magnet is weakened more and more until the clamping armature g releases the hold of the gripping-jaws e e upon the rod R, and the rod is allowed to drop a little, thus shortening the arc. The fine wire now receiving less current, the magnetism increases, and the rod is clamped again and slightly raised, if necessary. This clamping and releasing of the rod continues until the carbons are consumed. In practice the feed is so sensitive that for the greatest part of the time the movement of the rod cannot be detected without some actual measurement. During the normal operation of the lamp the armature lever L remains practically stationary, in the position shown in Fig. 283.

As the carbons burn away, the fine wire gets more current and the magnetism decreases accordingly. This causes the armature lever L to swing and the armature g to slowly lower under the weight of the moving parts until the end p, Fig. 283, hits a stop on the top plate, B. The adjustment is such that when this happens, the rod R is still securely gripped by the jaws e e. With the further downward movement of the armature lever blocked, the arc becomes longer as the carbons are consumed, and the compound magnet weakens more and more until the clamping armature g releases its grip on the rod R, allowing the rod to drop slightly, which shortens the arc. The fine wire now receives less current, causing the magnetism to increase, and the rod is clamped again and slightly raised if needed. This clamping and releasing of the rod continues until the carbons are consumed. In practice, the feed is so sensitive that for most of the time, the movement of the rod is undetectable without actual measurement. During normal operation of the lamp, the armature lever L stays nearly stationary in the position shown in Fig. 283.

Should it happen that, owing to an imperfection in it, the rod and the carbons drop too far, so as to make the arc too short, or even bring the carbons in contact, a very small amount of current passes through the fine wire, and the compound magnet becomes sufficiently strong to act as at the start in pulling the armature lever L down and separating the carbons to a greater distance.

Should it occur that, due to a flaw in it, the rod and the carbons drop too far, making the arc too short, or even bring the carbons into contact, a very small amount of current passes through the fine wire, and the compound magnet becomes strong enough to function as it did at the beginning by pulling the armature lever L down and separating the carbons to a greater distance.

It occurs often in practical work that the rod sticks in the guides. In this case the are reaches a great length, until it finally breaks. Then the light goes out, and frequently the fine wire is[Pg 464] injured. To prevent such an accident Mr. Tesla provides this lamp with an automatic cut-out which operates as follows: When, upon a failure of the feed, the arc reaches a certain predetermined length, such an amount of current is diverted through the fine wire that the polarity of the compound magnet is reversed. The clamping armature g is now moved against the shunt magnet N until it strikes the releasing pole n'. As soon as the contact is established, the current passes from the positive binding post over the clamp r, armature g, insulated shunt magnet, and the helix p' upon the main magnet M to the negative binding post. In this case the current passes in the opposite direction and changes the polarity of the magnet M, at the same time maintaining by magnetic induction in the core of the shunt magnet the required magnetism without reversal of polarity, and the armature g remains against the shunt magnet pole n'. The lamp is thus cut out as long as the carbons are separated. The cut out may be used in this form without any further improvement; but Mr. Tesla arranges it so that if the rod drops and the carbons come in contact the arc is started again. For this purpose he proportions the resistance of part p' and the number of the convolutions of the wire upon the main magnet so that when the carbons come in contact a sufficient amount of current is diverted through the carbons and the part x' to destroy or neutralize the magnetism of the compound magnet. Then the armature g, having a slight tendency to approach to the clamping pole m', comes out of contact with the releasing pole n'. As soon as this happens, the current through the part p' is interrupted, and the whole current passes through the part x. The magnet M is now strongly magnetized, the armature g is attracted, and the rod clamped. At the same time the armature lever L is pulled down out of its normal position and the arc started. In this way the lamp cuts itself out automatically when the arc gets too long, and reinserts itself automatically in the circuit if the carbons drop together.

It often happens in practical work that the rod gets stuck in the guides. In this situation, the arc reaches a great length until it finally breaks. Then the light goes out, and often the fine wire is[Pg 464] damaged. To prevent this accident, Mr. Tesla equips this lamp with an automatic cut-out that works like this: When, due to a failure of the feed, the arc reaches a certain predetermined length, an amount of current is redirected through the fine wire that reverses the polarity of the compound magnet. The clamping armature g is then moved against the shunt magnet N until it hits the releasing pole n'. Once contact is made, the current flows from the positive binding post through the clamp r, armature g, insulated shunt magnet, and the helix p' onto the main magnet M to the negative binding post. In this case, the current flows in the opposite direction, changing the polarity of the magnet M, while also maintaining the necessary magnetism in the core of the shunt magnet by magnetic induction without reversing polarity, allowing the armature g to stay against the shunt magnet pole n'. The lamp is thus cut out as long as the carbons are separated. The cut-out can work this way without any further improvement; however, Mr. Tesla designs it so that if the rod drops and the carbons touch, the arc will start again. For this purpose, he sizes the resistance of part p' and the number of coils of wire on the main magnet so that when the carbons contact, enough current is diverted through the carbons and part x' to neutralize the magnetism of the compound magnet. Then, the armature g, which has a slight tendency to move toward the clamping pole m', loses contact with the releasing pole n'. As soon as this happens, the current through part p' is interrupted, and the entire current flows through part x. The magnet M is now strongly magnetized, the armature g is attracted, and the rod is clamped. At the same time, the armature lever L is pulled down from its normal position and the arc is ignited. This way, the lamp automatically disconnects when the arc gets too long and reconnects itself in the circuit if the carbons touch.


CHAPTER XLI.

Improvement in "Unipolar" Generators.

Another interesting class of apparatus to which Mr. Tesla has directed his attention, is that of "unipolar" generators, in which a disc or a cylindrical conductor is mounted between magnetic poles adapted to produce an approximately uniform field. In the disc armature machines the currents induced in the rotating conductor flow from the centre to the periphery, or conversely, according to the direction of rotation or the lines of force as determined by the signs of the magnetic poles, and these currents are taken off usually by connections or brushes applied to the disc at points on its periphery and near its centre. In the case of the cylindrical armature machine, the currents developed in the cylinder are taken off by brushes applied to the sides of the cylinder at its ends.

Another interesting type of equipment that Mr. Tesla has focused on is "unipolar" generators, where a disc or cylindrical conductor is placed between magnetic poles designed to create an approximately uniform field. In the disc armature machines, the currents induced in the rotating conductor flow from the center to the outer edge, or vice versa, depending on the direction of rotation or the lines of force as determined by the orientation of the magnetic poles. These currents are typically collected through connections or brushes placed on the disc at points near its edge and close to its center. For the cylindrical armature machine, the currents generated in the cylinder are collected by brushes applied to the sides of the cylinder at its ends.

In order to develop economically an electromotive force available for practicable purposes, it is necessary either to rotate the conductor at a very high rate of speed or to use a disc of large diameter or a cylinder of great length; but in either case it becomes difficult to secure and maintain a good electrical connection between the collecting brushes and the conductor, owing to the high peripheral speed.

To create an electromotive force that's useful for practical applications economically, you either need to spin the conductor really quickly or use a large diameter disc or a long cylinder. However, in both situations, it’s challenging to establish and maintain a good electrical connection between the collecting brushes and the conductor because of the high peripheral speed.

It has been proposed to couple two or more discs together in series, with the object of obtaining a higher electro-motive force; but with the connections heretofore used and using other conditions of speed and dimension of disc necessary to securing good practicable results, this difficulty is still felt to be a serious obstacle to the use of this kind of generator. These objections Mr. Tesla has sought to avoid by constructing a machine with two fields, each having a rotary conductor mounted between its poles. The same principle is involved in the case of both forms of machine above described, but the description now given is confined to the disc type, which Mr. Tesla is inclined to favor for that machine. The discs are formed with flanges, after the[Pg 466] manner of pulleys, and are connected together by flexible conducting bands or belts.

It has been suggested to connect two or more discs in series to achieve a higher electromotive force; however, with the connections previously used and the different speed and size conditions needed to achieve good practical results, this challenge still presents a significant barrier to the use of this type of generator. Mr. Tesla has tried to address these concerns by designing a machine with two fields, each featuring a rotating conductor situated between its poles. The same principle applies to both types of machines mentioned above, but the description provided now focuses exclusively on the disc type, which Mr. Tesla prefers for that machine. The discs are designed with flanges, similar to pulleys, and are linked together by flexible conducting bands or belts.

The machine is built in such manner that the direction of magnetism or order of the poles in one field of force is opposite to that in the other, so that rotation of the discs in the same direction develops a current in one from centre to circumference and in the other from circumference to centre. Contacts applied therefore to the shafts upon which the discs are mounted form the terminals of a circuit the electro-motive force in which is the sum of the electro-motive forces of the two discs.

The machine is designed so that the direction of magnetism or the arrangement of the poles in one magnetic field is opposite to that in the other. This means that when the discs rotate in the same direction, one creates an electric current from the center to the edge, while the other creates a current from the edge back to the center. Contacts attached to the shafts holding the discs serve as the terminals of a circuit, where the total voltage is the sum of the voltages from the two discs.

It will be obvious that if the direction of magnetism in both fields be the same, the same result as above will be obtained by driving the discs in opposite directions and crossing the connecting belts. In this way the difficulty of securing and maintaining good contact with the peripheries of the discs is avoided and a cheap and durable machine made which is useful for many purposes—such as for an exciter for alternating current generators, for a motor, and for any other purpose for which dynamo machines are used.

It will be clear that if the direction of magnetism in both fields is the same, the same result as mentioned before will be achieved by spinning the discs in opposite directions and crossing the connecting belts. This way, the challenge of ensuring and keeping good contact with the edges of the discs is avoided, resulting in a cost-effective and durable machine that can be used for various applications—such as an exciter for alternating current generators, a motor, and any other purpose where dynamo machines are utilized.

Fig. 290, 291.
Fig. 290.Fig. 291.

Fig. 290 is a side view, partly in section, of this machine. Fig. 291 is a vertical section of the same at right angles to the shafts.[Pg 467]

Fig. 290 shows a side view, partially in section, of this machine. Fig. 291 provides a vertical section of the same from a different angle to the shafts.[Pg 467]

In order to form a frame with two fields of force, a support, A, is cast with two pole pieces B B' integral with it. To this are joined by bolts E a casting D, with two similar and corresponding pole pieces C C'. The pole pieces B B' are wound and connected to produce a field of force of given polarity, and the pole pieces C C' are wound so as to produce a field of opposite polarity. The driving shafts F G pass through the poles and are journaled in insulating bearings in the casting A D, as shown.

To create a frame with two fields of force, a support, A, is made with two pole pieces B B' attached to it. A casting D with two similar pole pieces C C' is then bolted on using bolts E. The pole pieces B B' are wrapped and connected to generate a magnetic field of a certain polarity, while the pole pieces C C' are wrapped to create a field of the opposite polarity. The driving shafts F G go through the poles and are supported in insulating bearings in the castings A D, as shown.

H K are the discs or generating conductors. They are composed of copper, brass, or iron and are keyed or secured to their respective shafts. They are provided with broad peripheral flanges J. It is of course obvious that the discs may be insulated from their shafts, if so desired. A flexible metallic belt L is passed over the flanges of the two discs, and, if desired, may be used to drive one of the discs. It is better, however, to use this belt merely as a conductor, and for this purpose sheet steel, copper, or other suitable metal is used. Each shaft is provided with a driving pulley M, by which power is imparted from a driving shaft.

H K are the discs or generating conductors. They are made of copper, brass, or iron and are attached to their respective shafts with a key. They have wide peripheral flanges J. It's clear that the discs can be insulated from their shafts if desired. A flexible metallic belt L is placed over the flanges of the two discs, and, if needed, it can be used to drive one of the discs. However, it’s better to use this belt just as a conductor, and for this purpose, sheet steel, copper, or another suitable metal is used. Each shaft has a driving pulley M, which transmits power from a driving shaft.

N N are the terminals. For the sake of clearness they are shown as provided with springs P, that bear upon the ends of the shafts. This machine, if self-exciting, would have copper bands around its poles; or conductors of any kind—such as wires shown in the drawings—may be used.

N N are the terminals. To keep things clear, they are shown with springs P that press against the ends of the shafts. If this machine is self-exciting, it would have copper bands around its poles; alternatively, any type of conductor—like the wires shown in the drawings—can be used.


It is thought appropriate by the compiler to append here some notes on unipolar dynamos, written by Mr. Tesla, on a recent occasion.

It seems fitting to include some notes on unipolar dynamos, written by Mr. Tesla, here.

NOTES ON A UNIPOLAR DYNAMO.[15]

It is characteristic of fundamental discoveries, of great achievements of intellect, that they retain an undiminished power upon the imagination of the thinker. The memorable experiment of Faraday with a disc rotating between the two poles of a magnet, which has borne such magnificent fruit, has long passed into every-day experience; yet there are certain features about this embryo of the present dynamos and motors which even to-day appear to us striking, and are worthy of the most careful study.

It’s typical for groundbreaking discoveries and significant intellectual achievements to retain a lasting impact on the imagination of those who ponder them. Faraday’s famous experiment with a disc spinning between the two poles of a magnet, which has produced remarkable results, has now become part of everyday experience. However, there are still certain aspects of this early version of today’s dynamos and motors that strike us even now and deserve our careful attention.

Consider, for instance, the case of a disc of iron or other metal [Pg 468]revolving between the two opposite poles of a magnet, and the polar surfaces completely covering both sides of the disc, and assume the current to be taken off or conveyed to the same by contacts uniformly from all points of the periphery of the disc. Take first the case of a motor. In all ordinary motors the operation is dependent upon some shifting or change of the resultant of the magnetic attraction exerted upon the armature, this process being effected either by some mechanical contrivance on the motor or by the action of currents of the proper character. We may explain the operation of such a motor just as we can that of a water-wheel. But in the above example of the disc surrounded completely by the polar surfaces, there is no shifting of the magnetic action, no change whatever, as far as we know, and yet rotation ensues. Here, then, ordinary considerations do not apply; we cannot even give a superficial explanation, as in ordinary motors, and the operation will be clear to us only when we shall have recognized the very nature of the forces concerned, and fathomed the mystery of the invisible connecting mechanism.

Consider, for example, a disc made of iron or another metal [Pg 468]spinning between the two opposite poles of a magnet, with the magnetic surfaces completely covering both sides of the disc. Assume that the current is drawn from or supplied to the disc uniformly from all points along its edge. First, let’s look at a motor. In typical motors, the operation depends on some shifting or change in the overall magnetic attraction acting on the armature, a process achieved either through a mechanical device within the motor or by the interaction of specially configured currents. We can explain how such a motor works similarly to a water-wheel. However, in the case of the disc completely surrounded by the magnetic surfaces, there is no shifting of the magnetic action, no change whatsoever, as far as we know, and yet it still spins. In this situation, normal explanations don’t apply; we can’t even offer a superficial explanation, like we do with regular motors, and we will only understand how it operates once we grasp the true nature of the forces involved and uncover the mystery of the invisible connecting mechanism.

Considered as a dynamo machine, the disc is an equally interesting object of study. In addition to its peculiarity of giving currents of one direction without the employment of commutating devices, such a machine differs from ordinary dynamos in that there is no reaction between armature and field. The armature current tends to set up a magnetization at right angles to that of the field current, but since the current is taken off uniformly from all points of the periphery, and since, to be exact, the external circuit may also be arranged perfectly symmetrical to the field magnet, no reaction can occur. This, however, is true only as long as the magnets are weakly energized, for when the magnets are more or less saturated, both magnetizations at right angles seemingly interfere with each other.

Considered a dynamo machine, the disk is also an interesting object of study. Besides its unique ability to produce currents in one direction without the use of commutating devices, this machine differs from regular dynamos in that there’s no interaction between the armature and the field. The armature current tends to create a magnetization that is perpendicular to that of the field current, but since the current is drawn evenly from all points on the periphery, and since the external circuit can also be arranged perfectly symmetrical to the field magnet, no reaction can happen. However, this holds true only as long as the magnets are weakly energized, because when the magnets become more or less saturated, both magnetizations at right angles seem to interfere with each other.

For the above reason alone it would appear that the output of such a machine should, for the same weight, be much greater than that of any other machine in which the armature current tends to demagnetize the field. The extraordinary output of the Forbes unipolar dynamo and the experience of the writer confirm this view.

For that reason alone, it seems that the output of such a machine should be much higher for the same weight compared to any other machine where the armature current tends to demagnetize the field. The impressive output of the Forbes unipolar dynamo and the writer's experience supports this perspective.

Again, the facility with which such a machine may be made to excite itself is striking, but this may be due—besides to the absence of armature reaction—to the perfect smoothness of the current and non-existence of self-induction.[Pg 469]

Again, the ease with which such a machine can start running by itself is impressive, but this might be due—not only to the lack of armature reaction—but also to the completely smooth current and the absence of self-induction.[Pg 469]

If the poles do not cover the disc completely on both sides, then, of course, unless the disc be properly subdivided, the machine will be very inefficient. Again, in this case there are points worthy of notice. If the disc be rotated and the field current interrupted, the current through the armature will continue to flow and the field magnets will lose their strength comparatively slowly. The reason for this will at once appear when we consider the direction of the currents set up in the disc.

If the poles don't completely cover the disc on both sides, then, naturally, unless the disc is properly divided, the machine will be very inefficient. There are also important points to note in this situation. If the disc is rotated and the field current is interrupted, the current through the armature will keep flowing, and the field magnets will gradually lose their strength. The reason for this becomes clear when we consider the direction of the currents generated in the disc.

Fig. 292. Fig. 292.

Referring to the diagram Fig. 292, d represents the disc with the sliding contacts B B' on the shaft and periphery. N and S represent the two poles of a magnet. If the pole N be above, as indicated in the diagram, the disc being supposed to be in the plane of the paper, and rotating in the direction of the arrow D, the current set up in the disc will flow from the centre to the periphery, as indicated by the arrow A. Since the magnetic action is more or less confined to the space between the poles N S, the other portions of the disc may be considered inactive. The current set up will therefore not wholly pass through the external circuit F, but will close through the disc itself, and generally, if the disposition be in any way similar to the one illustrated, by far the greater portion of the current generated will not appear externally, as the circuit F is practically short-circuited by the inactive portions of the disc. The direction of the resulting currents in the latter may be assumed to be as indicated by the dotted[Pg 470] lines and arrows m and n; and the direction of the energizing field current being indicated by the arrows a b c d, an inspection of the figure shows that one of the two branches of the eddy current, that is, A B' m B, will tend to demagnetize the field, while the other branch, that is, A B' n B, will have the opposite effect. Therefore, the branch A B' m B, that is, the one which is approaching the field, will repel the lines of the same, while branch A B' n B, that is, the one leaving the field, will gather the lines of force upon itself.

Referring to the diagram Fig. 292, d represents the disc with sliding contacts B B' on the shaft and edge. N and S represent the two poles of a magnet. If the pole N is positioned above, as shown in the diagram, with the disc assumed to be in the plane of the paper and rotating in the direction of the arrow D, the current generated in the disc will flow from the center to the edge, as indicated by the arrow A. Since the magnetic effect is mostly confined to the space between the poles N S, the other parts of the disc can be considered inactive. As a result, the current generated will not fully flow through the external circuit F, but will instead close through the disc itself. Generally, if the setup is similar to the one illustrated, the majority of the current produced will not show up externally, as the circuit F is practically short-circuited by the inactive sections of the disc. The direction of the resulting currents in those sections may be assumed to follow the dotted lines and arrows m and n; and the direction of the energizing field current is indicated by the arrows a b c d. A look at the figure shows that one of the two branches of the eddy current, specifically A B' m B, will tend to demagnetize the field, while the other branch, A B' n B, will have the opposite effect. Therefore, the branch A B' m B, which is approaching the field, will repel the lines of force, while branch A B' n B, which is leaving the field, will attract the lines of force to itself.

In consequence of this there will be a constant tendency to reduce the current flow in the path A B' m B, while on the other hand no such opposition will exist in path A B' n B, and the effect of the latter branch or path will be more or less preponderating over that of the former. The joint effect of both the assumed branch currents might be represented by that of one single current of the same direction as that energizing the field. In other words, the eddy currents circulating in the disc will energize the field magnet. This is a result quite contrary to what we might be led to suppose at first, for we would naturally expect that the resulting effect of the armature currents would be such as to oppose the field current, as generally occurs when a primary and secondary conductor are placed in inductive relations to each other. But it must be remembered that this results from the peculiar disposition in this case, namely, two paths being afforded to the current, and the latter selecting that path which offers the least opposition to its flow. From this we see that the eddy currents flowing in the disc partly energize the field, and for this reason when the field current is interrupted the currents in the disc will continue to flow, and the field magnet will lose its strength with comparative slowness and may even retain a certain strength as long as the rotation of the disc is continued.

As a result, there will be a constant tendency to decrease the current flow in the path A B' m B, while, on the other hand, there will be no such opposition in the path A B' n B. The effect of the latter path will dominate over the former. The combined effect of both assumed branch currents could be represented as a single current flowing in the same direction as that energizing the field. In other words, the eddy currents circulating in the disc will energize the field magnet. This result is quite the opposite of what we might initially think, as we would typically expect that the resulting effect of the armature currents would oppose the field current, which usually occurs when a primary and secondary conductor interact inductively. However, it's important to remember that this stems from the unique arrangement in this case, where there are two paths available for the current, and the current chooses the path that offers the least resistance to its flow. This shows that the eddy currents flowing in the disc partly energize the field. Therefore, when the field current is stopped, the currents in the disc will keep flowing, and the field magnet will lose its strength relatively slowly, even retaining some strength as long as the disc continues to spin.

The result will, of course, largely depend on the resistance and geometrical dimensions of the path of the resulting eddy current and on the speed of rotation; these elements, namely, determine the retardation of this current and its position relative to the field. For a certain speed there would be a maximum energizing action; then at higher speeds, it would gradually fall off to zero and finally reverse, that is, the resultant eddy current effect would be to weaken the field. The reaction would be best demonstrated experimentally by arranging the fields N S, N' S', freely movable on an axis concentric with the shaft of the[Pg 471] disc. If the latter were rotated as before in the direction of the arrow D, the field would be dragged in the same direction with a torque, which, up to a certain point, would go on increasing with the speed of rotation, then fall off, and, passing through zero, finally become negative; that is, the field would begin to rotate in opposite direction to the disc. In experiments with alternate current motors in which the field was shifted by currents of differing phase, this interesting result was observed. For very low speeds of rotation of the field the motor would show a torque of 900 lbs. or more, measured on a pulley 12 inches in diameter. When the speed of rotation of the poles was increased, the torque would diminish, would finally go down to zero, become negative, and then the armature would begin to rotate in opposite direction to the field.

The outcome will largely depend on the resistance and shape of the eddy current path, as well as the rotation speed; these factors dictate the delay of this current and its position relative to the field. At a certain speed, there would be maximum energizing action; then, at higher speeds, it would gradually decrease to zero and eventually reverse, meaning the resulting eddy current effect would weaken the field. This reaction would be best demonstrated in experiments by setting up the fields N S, N' S', which can move freely on an axis concentric with the shaft of the[Pg 471] disc. If the disc were rotated as before in the direction of the arrow D, the field would be dragged along in the same direction with a torque that would initially increase with the rotation speed, then decrease, eventually passing through zero and becoming negative; in other words, the field would start to rotate in the opposite direction to the disc. This interesting result was observed in experiments with alternating current motors where the field shifted due to currents of different phases. At very low rotation speeds, the motor would show a torque of 900 lbs. or more, measured on a 12-inch diameter pulley. As the pole rotation speed increased, the torque would decrease, eventually reach zero, become negative, and then the armature would begin to rotate in the opposite direction to the field.

To return to the principal subject; assume the conditions to be such that the eddy currents generated by the rotation of the disc strengthen the field, and suppose the latter gradually removed while the disc is kept rotating at an increased rate. The current, once started, may then be sufficient to maintain itself and even increase in strength, and then we have the case of Sir William Thomson's "current accumulator." But from the above considerations it would seem that for the success of the experiment the employment of a disc not subdivided[16] would be essential, for if there should be a radial subdivision, the eddy currents could not form and the self-exciting action would cease. If such a radially subdivided disc were used it would be necessary to connect the spokes by a conducting rim or in any proper manner so as to form a symmetrical system of closed circuits.

To get back to the main topic, let’s assume the conditions are such that the eddy currents produced by the rotating disc enhance the field. Now, imagine that field gradually being removed while the disc keeps spinning at a higher speed. Once the current gets going, it may be strong enough to sustain itself and even grow stronger. This is the scenario described in Sir William Thomson's "current accumulator." However, based on what we've discussed, it seems crucial for the experiment to use a disc that is not subdivided[16]. If there were radial subdivisions, the eddy currents wouldn't be able to form, and the self-exciting action would stop. If a radially subdivided disc were used, it would be necessary to connect the spokes with a conducting rim or in some effective way to create a balanced system of closed circuits.

The action of the eddy currents may be utilized to excite a machine of any construction. For instance, in Figs. 293 and 294 an arrangement is shown by which a machine with a disc armature might be excited. Here a number of magnets, N S, N S, are placed radially on each side of a metal disc D carrying on its rim a set of insulated coils, C C. The magnets form two separate fields, an internal and an external one, the solid disc rotating in the [Pg 472]field nearest the axis, and the coils in the field further from it. Assume the magnets slightly energized at the start; they could be strengthened by the action of the eddy currents in the solid disc so as to afford a stronger field for the peripheral coils. Although there is no doubt that under proper conditions a machine might be excited in this or a similar manner, there being sufficient experimental evidence to warrant such an assertion, such a mode of excitation would be wasteful.

The movement of eddy currents can be used to power any type of machine. For example, in Figs. 293 and 294, there's a setup showing how a machine with a disc armature could be powered. In this setup, several magnets, N S, N S, are positioned radially on each side of a metal disc D, which has a set of insulated coils C C attached to its rim. The magnets create two distinct fields, one internal and one external, with the solid disc rotating in the [Pg 472] field closest to the axis, and the coils in the field further away. If we start with the magnets slightly energized, the eddy currents in the solid disc could boost their strength, creating a stronger field for the peripheral coils. While it's clear that a machine could be energized this way under the right conditions, supported by enough experimental evidence to back this claim, this method of excitation would be inefficient.

But a unipolar dynamo or motor, such as shown in Fig. 292, may be excited in an efficient manner by simply properly subdividing the disc or cylinder in which the currents are set up, and it is practicable to do away with the field coils which are usually employed. Such a plan is illustrated in Fig. 295. The disc or cylinder D is supposed to be arranged to rotate between the two poles N and S of a magnet, which completely cover it on both sides, the contours of the disc and poles being represented by the circles d and d1 respectively, the upper pole being omitted for the sake of clearness. The cores of the magnet are supposed to be hollow, the shaft C of the disc passing through them. If the unmarked pole be below, and the disc be rotated screw fashion, the current will be, as before, from the centre to the periphery, and may be taken off by suitable sliding contacts, B B', on the shaft and periphery respectively. In this arrangement the current flowing through the disc and external circuit will have no appreciable effect on the field magnet.

But a unipolar dynamo or motor, like the one shown in Fig. 292, can be efficiently powered by simply properly dividing the disc or cylinder where the currents are generated, and it's possible to eliminate the field coils that are usually used. This method is illustrated in Fig. 295. The disc or cylinder D is designed to rotate between the two poles N and S of a magnet, which completely cover it on both sides. The shapes of the disc and the poles are represented by the circles d and d1, with the upper pole left out for clarity. The cores of the magnet are hollow, allowing the shaft C of the disc to pass through them. If the unmarked pole is below and the disc is rotated like a screw, the current will, as before, flow from the center to the edge and can be drawn off using suitable sliding contacts, B B', on the shaft and the edge, respectively. In this setup, the current flowing through the disc and external circuit will have no significant impact on the field magnet.

Fig. 293, 294.
Fig. 293.Fig. 294.

But let us now suppose the disc to be subdivided spirally, as [Pg 473]indicated by the full or dotted lines, Fig. 295. The difference of potential between a point on the shaft and a point on the periphery will remain unchanged, in sign as well as in amount. The only difference will be that the resistance of the disc will be augmented and that there will be a greater fall of potential from a point on the shaft to a point on the periphery when the same current is traversing the external circuit. But since the current is forced to follow the lines of subdivision, we see that it will tend either to energize or de-energize the field, and this will depend, other things being equal, upon the direction of the lines of subdivision. If the subdivision be as indicated by the full lines in Fig. 295, it is evident that if the current is of the same direction as before, that is, from centre to periphery, its effect will be to strengthen the field magnet; Whereas, if the subdivision be as indicated by the dotted lines, the current generated will tend to weaken the magnet. In the former case the machine will be capable of exciting itself when the disc is rotated in the direction of arrow D; in the latter case the direction of rotation must be reversed. Two such discs may be combined, however, as indicated, the two discs rotating in opposite fields, and in the same or opposite direction.

But let's now imagine the disc is divided spirally, as shown by the solid or dashed lines in Fig. 295. The potential difference between a point on the shaft and a point on the edge will stay the same, both in sign and in amount. The only change will be that the resistance of the disc will increase, resulting in a greater drop in potential from a point on the shaft to a point on the edge when the same current flows through the external circuit. However, since the current is directed along the lines of subdivision, it will either energize or de-energize the field, depending on the direction of the lines of subdivision, assuming all other factors are equal. If the subdivision follows the solid lines in Fig. 295, it’s clear that if the current flows from the center to the edge, it will strengthen the field magnet. Conversely, if the subdivision follows the dashed lines, the generated current will weaken the magnet. In the first case, the machine can excite itself when the disc rotates in the direction of arrow D; in the second case, the rotation direction must be reversed. However, two such discs can be paired as indicated, with the two discs rotating in opposite fields, and either in the same or opposite direction.

Fig. 295, 296.
Fig. 295.Fig. 296.

Similar disposition may, of course, be made in a type of machine in which, instead of a disc, a cylinder is rotated. In such unipolar machines, in the manner indicated, the usual field coils and poles may be omitted and the machine may be made to consist only of a cylinder or of two discs enveloped by a metal casting.

Similar arrangements can, of course, be made in a type of machine where a cylinder is rotated instead of a disc. In these unipolar machines, as mentioned, the standard field coils and poles can be omitted, and the machine can be made up of just a cylinder or two discs enclosed by a metal casing.

Instead of subdividing the disc or cylinder spirally, as indicated in Fig. 295, it is more convenient to interpose one or more turns[Pg 474] between the disc and the contact ring on the periphery, as illustrated in Fig. 296.

Instead of dividing the disc or cylinder in a spiral manner, as shown in Fig. 295, it is easier to place one or more turns[Pg 474] between the disc and the contact ring on the edge, as illustrated in Fig. 296.

A Forbes dynamo may, for instance, be excited in such a manner. In the experience of the writer it has been found that instead of taking the current from two such discs by sliding contacts, as usual, a flexible conducting belt may be employed to advantage. The discs are in such case provided with large flanges, affording a very great contact surface. The belt should be made to bear on the flanges with spring pressure to take up the expansion. Several machines with belt contact were constructed by the writer two years ago, and worked satisfactorily; but for want of time the work in that direction has been temporarily suspended. A number of features pointed out above have also been used by the writer in connection with some types of alternating current motors.

A Forbes dynamo might, for example, be energized in this way. From the writer's experience, it's been found that instead of using sliding contacts to draw current from two discs, a flexible conducting belt can be more effective. In this case, the discs are equipped with large flanges that provide a significantly larger contact surface. The belt should press against the flanges with spring tension to accommodate any expansion. A couple of machines with belt contact were built by the writer two years ago and operated well; however, due to time constraints, that work has been put on hold for now. Several of the features mentioned above have also been utilized by the writer in some types of alternating current motors.


PART IV.

APPENDIX.—EARLY PHASE MOTORS AND THE
TESLA MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL
OSCILLATOR.


CHAPTER XLII.

Mr. Tesla's Personal Exhibit at the World's Fair.

While the exhibits of firms engaged in the manufacture of electrical apparatus of every description at the Chicago World's Fair, afforded the visitor ample opportunity for gaining an excellent knowledge of the state of the art, there were also numbers of exhibits which brought out in strong relief the work of the individual inventor, which lies at the foundation of much, if not all, industrial or mechanical achievement. Prominent among such personal exhibits was that of Mr. Tesla, whose apparatus occupied part of the space of the Westinghouse Company, in Electricity Building.

While the displays from companies involved in making electrical devices at the Chicago World's Fair gave visitors a great chance to understand the current state of technology, there were also many exhibits that highlighted the contributions of individual inventors, which form the basis of much, if not all, industrial or mechanical progress. A standout among these personal displays was that of Mr. Tesla, whose equipment was part of the Westinghouse Company's exhibit in the Electricity Building.

This apparatus represented the results of work and thought covering a period of ten years. It embraced a large number of different alternating motors and Mr. Tesla's earlier high frequency apparatus. The motor exhibit consisted of a variety of fields and armatures for two, three and multiphase circuits, and gave a fair idea of the gradual evolution of the fundamental idea of the rotating magnetic field. The high frequency exhibit included Mr. Tesla's earlier machines and disruptive discharge coils and high frequency transformers, which he used in his investigations and some of which are referred to in his papers printed in this volume.

This equipment reflected ten years of hard work and deep thinking. It included a wide range of alternating motors and Mr. Tesla's earlier high-frequency devices. The motor display featured various fields and armatures for two-phase, three-phase, and multiphase circuits, illustrating the gradual development of the core concept of the rotating magnetic field. The high-frequency display included Mr. Tesla's earlier machines, disruptive discharge coils, and high-frequency transformers that he used in his research, some of which are mentioned in the papers included in this volume.

Fig. 297 shows a view of part of the exhibits containing the motor apparatus. Among these is shown at A a large ring intended to exhibit the phenomena of the rotating magnetic field. The field produced was very powerful and exhibited striking effects, revolving copper balls and eggs and bodies of various shapes at considerable distances and at great speeds. This ring was wound for two-phase circuits, and the winding was so distributed that a practically uniform field was obtained. This ring was prepared for Mr. Tesla's exhibit by Mr. C. F. Scott, electrician of the Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company.

Fig. 297 shows part of the exhibits featuring the motor apparatus. Among these is a large ring at A, designed to demonstrate the effects of the rotating magnetic field. The generated field was very powerful and displayed impressive effects, such as spinning copper balls, eggs, and objects of various shapes over considerable distances and at high speeds. This ring was designed for a two-phase circuit, and the winding was arranged to create a nearly uniform field. Mr. C. F. Scott, an electrician with the Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company, prepared this ring for Mr. Tesla's exhibit.

Fig. 297. Fig. 297.

A smaller ring, shown at B, was arranged like the one exhibited at A but designed especially to exhibit the rotation of an armature in a rotating field. In connection with these two rings there was an interesting exhibit shown by Mr. Tesla which consisted of a magnet with a coil, the magnet being arranged to rotate in bearings. With this magnet he first demonstrated the identity between a rotating field and a rotating magnet; the latter, when rotating, exhibited the same phenomena as the rings when they were energized by currents of differing phase. Another prominent exhibit was a model illustrated at C which is a two-phase motor, as well as an induction motor and transformer. It consists of a large outer ring of laminated iron wound with two superimposed, separated windings which can be connected in a variety of ways. This is one of the first models used by Mr. Tesla as an induction motor and rotating transformer. The armature was either a steel or wrought iron disc with a closed coil. When the motor was operated from a two phase generator the windings were connected in two groups, as usual. When used as an induction motor, the current induced in one of the windings of the ring was passed through the other winding on the ring and so the motor operated with only two wires. When used as a transformer the outer winding served, for instance, as a secondary and the inner as a primary. The model shown at D is one of the earliest rotating field motors, consisting of a thin iron ring wound with two sets of coils and an armature consisting of a series of steel discs partly cut away and arranged on a small arbor.

A smaller ring, marked at B, was set up like the one shown at A but specifically designed to demonstrate the rotation of an armature in a rotating field. Alongside these two rings, Mr. Tesla displayed an intriguing exhibit featuring a magnet with a coil, where the magnet was designed to rotate in bearings. With this magnet, he first illustrated the similarity between a rotating field and a rotating magnet; the latter, when in motion, showed the same phenomena as the rings when energized by currents of different phases. Another key exhibit was a model shown at C, which is a two-phase motor, as well as an induction motor and transformer. It consists of a large outer ring made of laminated iron wound with two layered, separated windings that can be connected in various ways. This was one of the first models used by Mr. Tesla as an induction motor and rotating transformer. The armature was either a steel or wrought iron disc with a closed coil. When the motor was powered by a two-phase generator, the windings were connected in two groups, as is typical. When functioning as an induction motor, the current induced in one of the windings of the ring was passed through the other winding on the ring, allowing the motor to operate with only two wires. When functioning as a transformer, the outer winding served, for example, as a secondary while the inner acted as a primary. The model displayed at D is one of the earliest rotating field motors, consisting of a thin iron ring wound with two sets of coils and an armature made up of a series of steel discs partly cut away and arranged on a small shaft.

At E is shown one of the first rotating field or induction motors used for the regulation of an arc lamp and for other purposes. It comprises a ring of discs with two sets of coils having different self-inductions, one set being of German silver and the other of copper wire. The armature is wound with two closed-circuited coils at right angles to each other. To the armature shaft are fastened levers and other devices to effect the regulation. At F is shown a model of a magnetic lag motor; this embodies a casting with pole projections protruding from two coils between which is arranged to rotate a smooth iron body. When an alternating current is sent through the two coils the pole projections of the field and armature within it are similarly magnetized, and upon the cessation or reversal of the current the armature and field repel each other and rotation is produced in this way.[Pg 480] Another interesting exhibit, shown at G, is an early model of a two field motor energized by currents of different phase. There are two independent fields of laminated iron joined by brass bolts; in each field is mounted an armature, both armatures being on the same shaft. The armatures were originally so arranged as to be placed in any position relatively to each other, and the fields also were arranged to be connected in a number of ways. The motor has served for the exhibition of a number of features; among other things, it has been used as a dynamo for the production of currents of any frequency between wide limits. In this case the field, instead of being energized by direct current, was energized by currents differing in phase, which produced a rotation of the field; the armature was then rotated in the same or in opposite direction to the movement of the field; and so any number of alternations of the currents induced in the armature, from a small to a high number, determined by the frequency of the energizing field coils and the speed of the armature, was obtained.

At E, you can see one of the first rotating field or induction motors used for controlling an arc lamp and other applications. It consists of a ring of discs with two sets of coils that have different self-inductions—one set made of German silver and the other made of copper wire. The armature is fitted with two closed-circuit coils positioned at right angles to one another. Levers and other devices for regulation are attached to the armature shaft. At F, there is a model of a magnetic lag motor; this has a casting with pole projections sticking out from two coils, with a smooth iron body designed to rotate between them. When alternating current flows through the two coils, the pole projections of the field and armature inside are magnetized in the same way, and when the current stops or reverses, the armature and field push away from each other, causing rotation. [Pg 480] Another fascinating exhibit, shown at G, is an early model of a two-field motor powered by currents of different phases. It features two independent laminated iron fields connected by brass bolts; each field has an armature mounted on the same shaft. The armatures were originally set up to be positioned in any relative arrangement, and the fields could also be connected in several ways. The motor has demonstrated various features; among other uses, it has functioned as a dynamo to generate currents of any frequency within a wide range. In this setup, the field was powered not by direct current but by currents that differed in phase, resulting in rotation of the field; the armature could then rotate either in the same direction or the opposite direction to the movement of the field, allowing for any number of current alternations induced in the armature—from a low to a high number—determined by the frequency of the energizing field coils and the speed of the armature.

Fig. 298. Fig. 298.

The models H, I, J, represent a variety of rotating field, synchronous motors which are of special value in long distance transmission work. The principle embodied in these motors was enunciated by Mr. Tesla in his lecture before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, in May, 1888[17]. It involves the production [Pg 481]of the rotating field in one of the elements of the motor by currents differing in phase and energizing the other element by direct currents. The armatures are of the two and three phase type. K is a model of a motor shown in an enlarged view in Fig. 298. This machine, together with that shown in Fig. 299, was exhibited at the same lecture, in May, 1888. They were the first rotating field motors which were independently tested, having for that purpose been placed in the hands of Prof. Anthony in the winter of 1887-88. From these tests it was shown that the efficiency and output of these motors was quite satisfactory in every respect.

The models H, I, J represent various rotating field synchronous motors that are particularly useful for long-distance transmission work. The principle behind these motors was presented by Mr. Tesla in his lecture to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers in May 1888[17]. It involves creating a rotating field in one part of the motor using currents that are out of phase while energizing the other part with direct currents. The armatures come in two-phase and three-phase types. K is a model of a motor displayed in an enlarged view in Fig. 298. This machine, along with the one shown in Fig. 299, was showcased at the same lecture in May 1888. They were the first rotating field motors to be independently tested, having been given to Prof. Anthony for testing in the winter of 1887-88. Those tests demonstrated that the efficiency and output of these motors were quite satisfactory in every way.

Fig. 299. Fig. 299.

It was intended to exhibit the model shown in Fig. 299, but it was unavailable for that purpose owing to the fact that it was some time ago handed over to the care of Prof. Ayrton in England. This model was originally provided with twelve independent coils; this number, as Mr. Tesla pointed out in his first lecture, being divisible by two and three, was selected in order to make various connections for two and three-phase operations, and during Mr. Tesla's experiments was used in many ways with from two to six phases. The model, Fig. 298, consists of a magnetic frame of laminated iron with four polar projections between which an armature is supported on brass bolts passing through the frame. A great variety of armatures was used in connection with these two and other fields. Some of the armatures are shown in front on the table, Fig. 297, and several are also shown enlarged in Figs. 300 to 310. An interesting exhibit is that shown at L, Fig. 297. This is an armature of hardened steel which was used in a demon[Pg 482]stration before the Society of Arts in Boston, by Prof. Anthony. Another curious exhibit is shown enlarged in Fig. 301. This consists of thick discs of wrought iron placed lengthwise, with a mass of copper cast around them. The discs were arranged longitudinally to afford an easier starting by reason of the induced current formed in the iron discs, which differed in phase from those in the copper. This armature would start with a single circuit and run in synchronism, and represents one of the earliest types of such an armature. Fig. 305 is another striking exhibit. This is one of the earliest types of an armature with holes beneath the periphery, in which copper conductors are imbedded. The armature has eight closed circuits and was used in many different ways. Fig. 304 is a type of synchronous armature consisting of a block of soft steel wound with a coil closed upon itself. This armature was used in connection with the field shown in Fig. 298 and gave excellent results.

It was meant to showcase the model shown in Fig. 299, but it was unavailable for that purpose because it was handed over to Prof. Ayrton in England some time ago. This model originally came with twelve independent coils; this number, as Mr. Tesla mentioned in his first lecture, is divisible by two and three. It was chosen to allow for various connections for two and three-phase operations, and during Mr. Tesla's experiments, it was used in many ways with between two to six phases. The model, Fig. 298, features a magnetic frame made of laminated iron with four polar projections, between which an armature is held by brass bolts that pass through the frame. A wide variety of armatures were used with these two and other fields. Some of the armatures are displayed in front on the table, Fig. 297, and several are also shown enlarged in Figs. 300 to 310. An interesting exhibit is the one marked L, Fig. 297. This is an armature made of hardened steel, which was used in a demonstration before the Society of Arts in Boston by Prof. Anthony. Another intriguing exhibit is shown enlarged in Fig. 301. This consists of thick discs of wrought iron arranged lengthwise, with a mass of copper cast around them. The discs were positioned longitudinally to allow easier starting due to the induced current created in the iron discs, which was out of phase with that in the copper. This armature could start with a single circuit and run in synchronism, representing one of the earliest types of such an armature. Fig. 305 is another notable exhibit. This is one of the earliest types of an armature with holes beneath the periphery, where copper conductors are embedded. The armature has eight closed circuits and was used in various ways. Fig. 304 is a type of synchronous armature made from a block of soft steel, wound with a coil that closes upon itself. This armature was used with the field shown in Fig. 298 and produced excellent results.

Fig. 300, 301, 302.
Fig. 300.Fig. 301.Fig. 302.
Fig. 303, 304, 305.
Fig. 303.Fig. 304.Fig. 305.
Fig. 306, 307, 308.
Fig. 306.Fig. 307.Fig. 308.
Fig. 309, 310.
Fig. 309.Fig. 310.

Fig. 302 represents a synchronous armature with a large coil around a body of iron. There is another very small coil at right angles to the first. This small coil was used for the purpose of[Pg 483] increasing the starting torque and was found very effective in this connection. Figs. 306 and 308 show a favorite construction of armature; the iron body is made up of two sets of discs cut away and placed at right angles to each other, the interstices being wound with coils. The one shown in Fig. 308 is provided with an additional groove on each of the projections formed by the discs, for the purpose of increasing the starting torque by a wire wound in these projections. Fig. 307 is a form of armature similarly constructed, but with four independent coils wound upon the four projections. This armature was used to reduce the speed of the motor with reference to that of the generator. Fig. 300 is still another armature with a great number of independent circuits closed upon themselves, so that all the dead points on the armature are done away with, and the armature has a large starting torque. Fig. 303 is another type of armature for a four-pole motor but with coils wound upon a smooth surface. A number of these armatures have hollow shafts, as they have been used in many ways. Figs. 309 and 310 represent armatures to which either alternating or direct current was conveyed by means of sliding rings. Fig. 309 consists of a soft iron body with a single coil wound around it, the ends of the coil being connected to two sliding rings to which, usually, direct current was conveyed. The armature shown in Fig. 310 has three insulated rings on a shaft and was used in connection with two or three phase circuits.

Fig. 302 shows a synchronous armature with a large coil wrapped around an iron core. There’s another small coil at a right angle to the first one. This small coil was added to [Pg 483] increase the starting torque and proved to be very effective. Figs. 306 and 308 illustrate a popular design for the armature; the iron core consists of two sets of discs cut and arranged at right angles to one another, with the gaps wound with coils. The one in Fig. 308 has an extra groove on each of the projections made by the discs, which helps boost the starting torque by winding a wire in these projections. Fig. 307 shows a similar armature, but it has four separate coils wound around the four projections. This design was used to lower the motor's speed relative to the generator's. Fig. 300 features yet another armature with numerous independent circuits that are closed off, eliminating all dead points on the armature and providing a high starting torque. Fig. 303 represents a different type of armature for a four-pole motor, with coils wound on a smooth surface. Many of these armatures have hollow shafts, as they have been utilized in various applications. Figs. 309 and 310 depict armatures that received either alternating or direct current through sliding rings. Fig. 309 has a soft iron body with a single coil around it, connected at the ends to two sliding rings, which typically received direct current. The armature in Fig. 310 features three insulated rings on a shaft and was used with two or three-phase circuits.

All these models shown represent early work, and the enlarged engravings are made from photographs taken early in 1888. There is a great number of other models which were exhibited, but which are not brought out sharply in the engraving, Fig. 297. For example at M is a model of a motor comprising an armature with a hollow shaft wound with two or three coils for two or three-phase circuits; the armature was arranged to be stationary and the generating circuits were connected directly to the generator. Around the armature is arranged to rotate on its shaft a casting forming six closed circuits. On the outside this casting was turned smooth and the belt was placed on it for driving with any desired appliance. This also is a very early model.

All of these models shown represent early work, and the enlarged engravings are made from photographs taken in early 1888. There are many other models that were displayed, but which are not clearly shown in the engraving, Fig. 297. For instance, at M, there's a model of a motor that includes an armature with a hollow shaft wrapped with two or three coils for two or three-phase circuits; the armature was designed to remain stationary while the generating circuits were connected directly to the generator. Surrounding the armature, a casting is arranged to rotate on its shaft, forming six closed circuits. The outside of this casting was smoothed out, and a belt was placed on it for driving any desired appliance. This is also a very early model.

On the left side of the table there are seen a large variety of models, N, O, P, etc., with fields of various shapes. Each of these models involves some distinct idea and they all represent gradual[Pg 484] development chiefly interesting as showing Mr. Tesla's efforts to adapt his system to the existing high frequencies.

On the left side of the table, you can see a wide range of models, N, O, P, etc., with fields of different shapes. Each of these models showcases a specific concept and all of them highlight gradual[Pg 484] development, primarily interesting because they display Mr. Tesla's attempts to adjust his system to the existing high frequencies.

On the right side of the table, at S, T, are shown, on separate supports, larger and more perfected armatures of commercial motors, and in the space around the table a variety of motors and generators supplying currents to them was exhibited.

On the right side of the table, at S, T, larger and more advanced frameworks of commercial motors are displayed on separate stands, and around the table, there is a variety of motors and generators providing current to them.

The high frequency exhibit embraced Mr. Tesla's first original apparatus used in his investigations. There was exhibited a glass tube with one layer of silk-covered wire wound at the top and a copper ribbon on the inside. This was the first disruptive discharge coil constructed by him. At U is shown the disruptive discharge coil exhibited by him in his lecture before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, in May, 1891.[18] At V and W are shown some of the first high frequency transformers. A number of various fields and armatures of small models of high frequency apparatus as shown at X and Y, and others not visible in the picture, were exhibited. In the annexed space the dynamo then used by Mr. Tesla at Columbia College was exhibited; also another form of high frequency dynamo used.

The high-frequency exhibit showcased Mr. Tesla's first original equipment used in his research. There was a glass tube with one layer of silk-covered wire wound at the top and a copper ribbon on the inside. This was the first disruptive discharge coil he built. At U, you can see the disruptive discharge coil he displayed in his lecture at the American Institute of Electrical Engineers in May 1891.[18] At V and W, some of the earliest high-frequency transformers were shown. Various fields and armatures of small models of high-frequency equipment are displayed at X and Y, along with others not visible in the image. In the adjacent area, the dynamo Mr. Tesla used at Columbia College was exhibited, along with another type of high-frequency dynamo used.

Fig. 311. Fig. 311.

In this space also was arranged a battery of Leyden jars and his large disruptive discharge coil which was used for exhibiting [Pg 485]the light phenomena in the adjoining dark room. The coil was operated at only a small fraction of its capacity, as the necessary condensers and transformers could not be had and as Mr. Tesla's stay was limited to one week; notwithstanding, the phenomena were of a striking character. In the room were arranged two large plates placed at a distance of about eighteen feet from each other. Between them were placed two long tables with all sorts of phosphorescent bulbs and tubes; many of these were prepared with great care and marked legibly with the names which would shine with phosphorescent glow. Among them were some with the names of Helmholtz, Faraday, Maxwell, Henry, Franklin, etc. Mr. Tesla had also not forgotten the greatest living poet of his own country, Zmaj Jovan; two or three were prepared with inscriptions, like "Welcome, Electricians," and produced a beautiful effect. Each represented some phase of this work and stood for some individual experiment of importance. Outside the room was the small battery seen in Fig. 311, for the exhibition of some of the impedance and other phenomena of interest. Thus, for instance, a thick copper bar bent in arched form was provided with clamps for the attachment of lamps, and a number of lamps were kept at incandescence on the bar; there was also a little motor shown on the table operated by the disruptive discharge.

In this space, there was also a setup of Leyden jars and a large disruptive discharge coil used to showcase the light effects in the nearby dark room. The coil was run at only a small fraction of its full capacity since the necessary condensers and transformers weren’t available and Mr. Tesla's visit was limited to one week; nevertheless, the effects were quite impressive. In the room, two large plates were spaced about eighteen feet apart. Between them were two long tables filled with various kinds of phosphorescent bulbs and tubes; many of these were carefully prepared and clearly labeled with names that would glow. Among them were names like Helmholtz, Faraday, Maxwell, Henry, Franklin, and others. Mr. Tesla also recognized the greatest living poet from his country, Zmaj Jovan; two or three were labeled with messages like "Welcome, Electricians," creating a striking effect. Each represented a different aspect of his work and symbolized an important individual experiment. Outside the room was the small battery shown in Fig. 311, used to demonstrate some of the impedance and other interesting phenomena. For example, a thick copper bar bent into an arch had clamps for attaching lamps, and several lamps were kept glowing on the bar; there was also a small motor displayed on the table powered by the disruptive discharge.

As will be remembered by those who visited the Exposition, the Westinghouse Company made a line exhibit of the various commercial motors of the Tesla system, while the twelve generators in Machinery Hall were of the two-phase type constructed for distributing light and power. Mr. Tesla, also exhibited some models of his oscillators.

As those who visited the Exposition will recall, the Westinghouse Company showcased a selection of the different commercial motors of the Tesla system, while the twelve generators in Machinery Hall were of the two-phase type designed for distributing light and power. Mr. Tesla also displayed some models of his oscillators.


CHAPTER XLIII.

The Tesla Mechanical and Electrical Oscillators.

On the evening of Friday, August 25, 1893, Mr. Tesla delivered a lecture on his mechanical and electrical oscillators, before the members of the Electrical Congress, in the hall adjoining the Agricultural Building, at the World's Fair, Chicago. Besides the apparatus in the room, he employed an air compressor, which was driven by an electric motor.

On the evening of Friday, August 25, 1893, Mr. Tesla gave a talk on his mechanical and electrical oscillators to the members of the Electrical Congress in the hall next to the Agricultural Building at the World's Fair in Chicago. In addition to the equipment in the room, he used an air compressor powered by an electric motor.

Mr. Tesla was introduced by Dr. Elisha Gray, and began by stating that the problem he had set out to solve was to construct, first, a mechanism which would produce oscillations of a perfectly constant period independent of the pressure of steam or air applied, within the widest limits, and also independent of frictional losses and load. Secondly, to produce electric currents of a perfectly constant period independently of the working conditions, and to produce these currents with mechanism which should be reliable and positive in its action without resorting to spark gaps and breaks. This he successfully accomplished in his apparatus, and with this apparatus, now, scientific men will be provided with the necessaries for carrying on investigations with alternating currents with great precision. These two inventions Mr. Tesla called, quite appropriately, a mechanical and an electrical oscillator, respectively.

Mr. Tesla was introduced by Dr. Elisha Gray and began by stating that his goal was to create, first, a mechanism that would produce oscillations of a perfectly constant period, regardless of the pressure of steam or air applied, across a wide range, and also independent of frictional losses and load. Secondly, he aimed to generate electric currents with a perfectly constant period, no matter the working conditions, using a mechanism that would be reliable and consistent without needing spark gaps or breaks. He achieved this successfully with his apparatus, which will now provide scientists with the tools necessary for conducting precise investigations with alternating currents. Mr. Tesla aptly named these two inventions a mechanical oscillator and an electrical oscillator, respectively.

The former is substantially constructed in the following way. There is a piston in a cylinder made to reciprocate automatically by proper dispositions of parts, similar to a reciprocating tool. Mr. Tesla pointed out that he had done a great deal of work in perfecting his apparatus so that it would work efficiently at such high frequency of reciprocation as he contemplated, but he did not dwell on the many difficulties encountered. He exhibited, however, the pieces of a steel arbor which had been actually torn apart while vibrating against a minute air cushion.

The first one is built in the following way. There's a piston in a cylinder that moves back and forth automatically through the arrangement of parts, like a reciprocating tool. Mr. Tesla mentioned that he had done a lot of work to refine his device so it could operate efficiently at the high frequency of back-and-forth motion he envisioned, but he didn't focus on the numerous challenges he faced. He did, however, show the pieces of a steel shaft that had actually been ripped apart while vibrating against a tiny air cushion.

With the piston above referred to there is associated in one of his models in an independent chamber an air spring, or dash pot,[Pg 487] or else he obtains the spring within the chambers of the oscillator itself. To appreciate the beauty of this it is only necessary to say that in that disposition, as he showed it, no matter what the rigidity of the spring and no matter what the weight of the moving parts, in other words, no matter what the period of vibrations, the vibrations of the spring are always isochronous with the applied pressure. Owing to this, the results obtained with these vibrations are truly wonderful. Mr. Tesla provides for an air spring of tremendous rigidity, and he is enabled to vibrate big weights at an enormous rate, considering the inertia, owing to the recoil of the spring. Thus, for instance, in one of these experiments, he vibrates a weight of approximately 20 pounds at the rate of about 80 per second and with a stroke of about 7/8 inch, but by shortening the stroke the weight could be vibrated many hundred times, and has been, in other experiments.

With the piston mentioned above, there’s an air spring or dash pot placed in an independent chamber in one of his models, or he incorporates the spring within the chambers of the oscillator itself. To really appreciate its elegance, it’s important to note that, in this setup, no matter how stiff the spring is or how heavy the moving parts are—which means the period of vibrations doesn’t matter—the vibrations of the spring always match the applied pressure. Because of this, the results achieved with these vibrations are truly remarkable. Mr. Tesla allows for an air spring with incredible stiffness, enabling him to vibrate large weights at an impressive speed, considering the inertia caused by the spring's recoil. For instance, in one of these experiments, he vibrates a weight of about 20 pounds at a rate of around 80 times per second with a stroke of about 7/8 inch. However, by reducing the stroke, the weight could be vibrated many hundreds of times, and this has been demonstrated in other experiments.

To start the vibrations, a powerful blow is struck, but the adjustment can be so made that only a minute effort is required to start, and, even without any special provision it will start by merely turning on the pressure suddenly. The vibration being, of course, isochronous, any change of pressure merely produces a shortening or lengthening of the stroke. Mr. Tesla showed a number of very clear drawings, illustrating the construction of the apparatus from which its working was plainly discernible. Special provisions are made so as to equalize the pressure within the dash pot and the outer atmosphere. For this purpose the inside chambers of the dash pot are arranged to communicate with the outer atmosphere so that no matter how the temperature of the enclosed air might vary, it still retains the same mean density as the outer atmosphere, and by this means a spring of constant rigidity is obtained. Now, of course, the pressure of the atmosphere may vary, and this would vary the rigidity of the spring, and consequently the period of vibration, and this feature constitutes one of the great beauties of the apparatus; for, as Mr. Tesla pointed out, this mechanical system acts exactly like a string tightly stretched between two points, and with fixed nodes, so that slight changes of the tension do not in the least alter the period of oscillation.

To start the vibrations, a strong blow is delivered, but the setup can be adjusted so that only a small effort is needed to get things going, and even without any special setup, it will start simply by suddenly turning on the pressure. The vibration is, of course, isochronous, so any change in pressure just shortens or lengthens the stroke. Mr. Tesla presented several clear diagrams that illustrated how the device was built and made its operation easy to understand. Special measures are taken to balance the pressure inside the dashpot with the outside atmosphere. For this purpose, the inner chambers of the dashpot are designed to connect with the outer atmosphere, ensuring that no matter how the temperature of the trapped air changes, it maintains the same average density as the outer atmosphere, thus providing a spring with constant rigidity. Naturally, the atmospheric pressure can change, affecting the spring's rigidity, which in turn alters the vibration period. This feature is one of the great advantages of the device; as Mr. Tesla noted, this mechanical system works exactly like a string tightly stretched between two points with fixed nodes, so slight changes in tension don’t significantly affect the oscillation period.

The applications of such an apparatus are, of course, numerous and obvious. The first is, of course, to produce electric currents, and by a number of models and apparatus on the lecture platform, Mr. Tesla showed how this could be carried out in[Pg 488] practice by combining an electric generator with his oscillator. He pointed out what conditions must be observed in order that the period of vibration of the electrical system might not disturb the mechanical oscillation in such a way as to alter the periodicity, but merely to shorten the stroke. He combines a condenser with a self-induction, and gives to the electrical system the same period as that at which the machine itself oscillates, so that both together then fall in step and electrical and mechanical resonance is obtained, and maintained absolutely unvaried.

The uses of such a device are obviously numerous and clear. First, it can produce electric currents, and with several models and devices during the lecture, Mr. Tesla demonstrated how this could be done in[Pg 488] practice by combining an electric generator with his oscillator. He explained what conditions need to be met so that the vibration period of the electrical system does not interfere with the mechanical oscillation in a way that changes the periodicity, but only reduces the stroke length. He pairs a capacitor with self-induction and adjusts the electrical system to match the oscillation period of the machine itself, allowing both to work in sync and achieve consistent electrical and mechanical resonance.

Next he showed a model of a motor with delicate wheelwork, which was driven by these currents at a constant speed, no matter what the air pressure applied was, so that this motor could be employed as a clock. He also showed a clock so constructed that it could be attached to one of the oscillators, and would keep absolutely correct time. Another curious and interesting feature which Mr. Tesla pointed out was that, instead of controlling the motion of the reciprocating piston by means of a spring, so as to obtain isochronous vibration, he was actually able to control the mechanical motion by the natural vibration of the electro-magnetic system, and he said that the case was a very simple one, and was quite analogous to that of a pendulum. Thus, supposing we had a pendulum of great weight, preferably, which would be maintained in vibration by force, periodically applied; now that force, no matter how it might vary, although it would oscillate the pendulum, would have no control over its period.

Next, he presented a model of a motor with intricate wheelwork, which was powered by these currents at a steady speed, regardless of the air pressure applied, allowing this motor to function as a clock. He also displayed a clock designed to be attached to one of the oscillators that would keep perfectly accurate time. Another fascinating and intriguing feature that Mr. Tesla highlighted was that, instead of using a spring to control the motion of the reciprocating piston for consistent vibration, he could control the mechanical motion through the natural vibration of the electromagnetic system. He mentioned that the case was quite straightforward and similar to that of a pendulum. So, if we had a heavy pendulum, ideally, which would be kept in motion by a periodically applied force; that force, no matter how it fluctuated, would cause the pendulum to oscillate, but would not affect its period.

Mr. Tesla also described a very interesting phenomenon which he illustrated by an experiment. By means of this new apparatus, he is able to produce an alternating current in which the e. m. f. of the impulses in one direction preponderates over that of those in the other, so that there is produced the effect of a direct current. In fact he expressed the hope that these currents would be capable of application in many instances, serving as direct currents. The principle involved in this preponderating e. m. f. he explains in this way: Suppose a conductor is moved into the magnetic field and then suddenly withdrawn. If the current is not retarded, then the work performed will be a mere fractional one; but if the current is retarded, then the magnetic field acts as a spring. Imagine that the motion of the conductor is arrested by the current generated, and that at the instant when it stops to move into the field, there is still the[Pg 489] maximum current flowing in the conductor; then this current will, according to Lenz's law, drive the conductor out of the field again, and if the conductor has no resistance, then it would leave the field with the velocity it entered it. Now it is clear that if, instead of simply depending on the current to drive the conductor out of the field, the mechanically applied force is so timed that it helps the conductor to get out of the field, then it might leave the field with higher velocity than it entered it, and thus one impulse is made to preponderate in e. m. f. over the other.

Mr. Tesla also described a really interesting phenomenon, which he illustrated with an experiment. With this new device, he can produce an alternating current where the electromotive force (e.m.f.) of the impulses in one direction is stronger than those in the other, creating the effect of a direct current. In fact, he expressed hope that these currents could be applied in many situations, acting as direct currents. He explains the principle behind this stronger e.m.f. like this: Imagine a conductor is moved into a magnetic field and then suddenly pulled out. If the current is not slowed down, the work done will be minimal; but if the current is slowed, the magnetic field acts like a spring. Picture the conductor's motion being stopped by the generated current, and at the moment it halts its movement into the field, there's still the maximum current flowing in the conductor; then, according to Lenz's law, this current will push the conductor out of the field again, and if the conductor has no resistance, it would leave the field at the same speed it entered. Now, it's clear that if, instead of just relying on the current to push the conductor out, the mechanically applied force is timed to assist the conductor's exit, then it might leave the field faster than it entered, thus making one impulse have a greater e.m.f. than the other.

With a current of this nature, Mr. Tesla energized magnets strongly, and performed many interesting experiments bearing out the fact that one of the current impulses preponderates. Among them was one in which he attached to his oscillator a ring magnet with a small air gap between the poles. This magnet was oscillated up and down 80 times a second. A copper disc, when inserted within the air gap of the ring magnet, was brought into rapid rotation. Mr. Tesla remarked that this experiment also seemed to demonstrate that the lines of flow of current through a metallic mass are disturbed by the presence of a magnet in a manner quite independently of the so-called Hall effect. He showed also a very interesting method of making a connection with the oscillating magnet. This was accomplished by attaching to the magnet small insulated steel rods, and connecting to these rods the ends of the energizing coil. As the magnet was vibrated, stationary nodes were produced in the steel rods, and at these points the terminals of a direct current source were attached. Mr. Tesla also pointed out that one of the uses of currents, such as those produced in his apparatus, would be to select any given one of a number of devices connected to the same circuit by picking out the vibration by resonance. There is indeed little doubt that with Mr. Tesla's devices, harmonic and synchronous telegraphy will receive a fresh impetus, and vast possibilities are again opened up.

With a current like this, Mr. Tesla powerfully energized magnets and conducted many fascinating experiments that showed one of the current impulses was dominant. One such experiment involved attaching a ring magnet with a small air gap between the poles to his oscillator. This magnet oscillated up and down 80 times per second. When a copper disc was placed within the air gap of the ring magnet, it began to spin rapidly. Mr. Tesla noted that this experiment also seemed to prove that the flow of current through a metal mass is disturbed by the presence of a magnet independently of the so-called Hall effect. He also demonstrated an interesting method of connecting to the oscillating magnet. This was done by attaching small insulated steel rods to the magnet and connecting the ends of the energizing coil to these rods. As the magnet vibrated, stationary nodes formed in the steel rods, and the terminals of a direct current source were attached at these points. Mr. Tesla pointed out that one potential use of currents like those generated in his apparatus would be to select a specific device connected to the same circuit by tuning into the vibration through resonance. There’s no doubt that Mr. Tesla's innovations will give a great boost to harmonic and synchronous telegraphy, opening up vast new possibilities.

Mr. Tesla was very much elated over his latest achievements, and said that he hoped that in the hands of practical, as well as scientific men, the devices described by him would yield important results. He laid special stress on the facility now afforded for investigating the effect of mechanical vibration in all directions, and also showed that he had observed a number of facts in connection with iron cores.[Pg 490]

Mr. Tesla was really excited about his latest achievements and expressed hope that practical and scientific individuals would achieve significant results with the devices he described. He emphasized the ease now available for studying the effects of mechanical vibrations in all directions and pointed out that he had noticed several facts related to iron cores.[Pg 490]

Fig. 312. Fig. 312.

The engraving, Fig. 312, shows, in perspective, one of the forms of apparatus used by Mr. Tesla in his earlier investigations in this field of work, and its interior construction is made plain by the sectional view shown in Fig. 313. It will be noted that the piston P is fitted into the hollow of a cylinder C which is provided with channel ports O O, and I, extending all around the inside surface. In this particular apparatus there are two channels O O for the outlet of the working fluid and one, I, for the inlet. The piston P is provided with two slots S S' at a carefully determined distance, one from the other. The tubes T T which are screwed into the holes drilled into the piston, establish communication between the slots S S' and chambers on each side of the piston, each of these chambers connecting with the slot which is remote from it. The piston P is screwed tightly on a shaft A [Pg 491] which passes through fitting boxes at the end of the cylinder C. The boxes project to a carefully determined distance into the hollow of the cylinder C, thus determining the length of the stroke.

The engraving, Fig. 312, shows, in perspective, one of the types of equipment used by Mr. Tesla in his early research in this area, and its internal construction is clarified by the sectional view shown in Fig. 313. It’s important to note that the piston P fits into the hollow of a cylinder C that has channel ports O O and I all around the inside surface. In this specific apparatus, there are two channels O O for the outlet of the working fluid and one, I, for the inlet. The piston P has two slots S S' placed at a carefully measured distance from each other. The tubes T T that are screwed into the holes drilled into the piston connect the slots S S' to chambers on each side of the piston, with each chamber linking to the slot that is furthest away from it. The piston P is tightly screwed onto a shaft A [Pg 491] which goes through fitting boxes at the end of the cylinder C. The boxes extend a precisely measured distance into the hollow of the cylinder C, thus determining the length of the stroke.

Surrounding the whole is a jacket J. This jacket acts chiefly to diminish the sound produced by the oscillator and as a jacket when the oscillator is driven by steam, in which case a somewhat different arrangement of the magnets is employed. The apparatus here illustrated was intended for demonstration purposes, air being used as most convenient for this purpose.

Surrounding it all is a jacket J. This jacket mainly works to reduce the sound made by the oscillator and serves as a cover when the oscillator is powered by steam, in which case a slightly different setup of the magnets is used. The equipment shown here was designed for demonstration purposes, with air being used as it is the most convenient option for this.

A magnetic frame M M is fastened so as to closely surround the oscillator and is provided with energizing coils which establish two strong magnetic fields on opposite sides. The magnetic frame is made up of thin sheet iron. In the intensely concentrated field thus produced, there are arranged two pairs of coils H H supported in metallic frames which are screwed on the shaft A of the piston and have additional bearings in the boxes B B on each side. The whole is mounted on a metallic base resting on two wooden blocks.

A magnetic frame M M is attached to tightly encircle the oscillator and comes with energizing coils that create two strong magnetic fields on opposite sides. The magnetic frame is made of thin sheet metal. Within the highly concentrated field generated, there are two pairs of coils H H supported in metal frames that are screwed onto the shaft A of the piston and have extra bearings in the boxes B B on each side. The whole assembly is mounted on a metal base that rests on two wooden blocks.

Fig. 313. Fig. 313.

The operation of the device is as follows: The working fluid being admitted through an inlet pipe to the slot I and the piston being supposed to be in the position indicated, it is sufficient, though not necessary, to give a gentle tap on one of the shaft[Pg 492] ends protruding from the boxes B. Assume that the motion imparted be such as to move the piston to the left (when looking at the diagram) then the air rushes through the slot S' and tube T into the chamber to the left. The pressure now drives the piston towards the right and, owing to its inertia, it overshoots the position of equilibrium and allows the air to rush through the slot S and tube T into the chamber to the right, while the communication to the left hand chamber is cut off, the air of the latter chamber escaping through the outlet O on the left. On the return stroke a similar operation takes place on the right hand side. This oscillation is maintained continuously and the apparatus performs vibrations from a scarcely perceptible quiver amounting to no more than 1 of an inch, up to vibrations of a little over 3/8 of an inch, according to the air pressure and load. It is indeed interesting to see how an incandescent lamp is kept burning with the apparatus showing a scarcely perceptible quiver.

The device works like this: The working fluid enters through an inlet pipe to slot I with the piston in the position shown. It’s enough, though not required, to give a light tap on one of the ends of the shaft[Pg 492] sticking out from the boxes B. If the motion makes the piston move to the left (as seen in the diagram), the air rushes through slot S' and tube T into the chamber on the left. The pressure then pushes the piston to the right, and because of its inertia, it overshoots the equilibrium position and allows air to flow through slot S and tube T into the chamber on the right, while the left chamber is sealed off, letting the air from there escape through outlet O on the left. During the return stroke, a similar process occurs on the right side. This oscillation continues continuously, and the apparatus produces vibrations ranging from a barely noticeable quiver of less than 1 of an inch to vibrations just over 3/8 of an inch, depending on the air pressure and load. It’s fascinating to see how an incandescent lamp stays lit while the apparatus shows a barely noticeable quiver.

To perfect the mechanical part of the apparatus so that oscillations are maintained economically was one thing, and Mr. Tesla hinted in his lecture at the great difficulties he had first encountered to accomplish this. But to produce oscillations which would be of constant period was another task of no mean proportions. As already pointed out, Mr. Tesla obtains the constancy of period in three distinct ways. Thus, he provides properly calculated chambers, as in the case illustrated, in the oscillator itself; or he associates with the oscillator an air spring of constant resilience. But the most interesting of all, perhaps, is the maintenance of the constancy of oscillation by the reaction of the electromagnetic part of the combination. Mr. Tesla winds his coils, by preference, for high tension and associates with them a condenser, making the natural period of the combination fairly approximating to the average period at which the piston would oscillate without any particular provision being made for the constancy of period under varying pressure and load. As the piston with the coils is perfectly free to move, it is extremely susceptible to the influence of the natural vibration set up in the circuits of the coils H H. The mechanical efficiency of the apparatus is very high owing to the fact that friction is reduced to a minimum and the weights which are moved are small; the output of the oscillator is therefore a very large one.

To improve the mechanical aspect of the equipment so that oscillations are maintained efficiently was one challenge, and Mr. Tesla mentioned in his lecture the significant difficulties he initially faced to achieve this. However, generating oscillations that have a consistent period was another considerable task. As previously noted, Mr. Tesla achieves this period consistency in three specific ways. He designs precisely calculated chambers, as shown in the example within the oscillator itself; or he pairs the oscillator with an air spring that has constant resilience. But perhaps the most fascinating method is maintaining the constancy of oscillation through the reaction of the electromagnetic components involved. Mr. Tesla prefers to wind his coils for high tension and pairs them with a capacitor, allowing the natural period of the combination to closely match the average period at which the piston would oscillate without any specific measures for period consistency under varying pressure and load. Since the piston with the coils can move freely, it is highly responsive to the natural vibrations generated in the coils' circuits H H. The mechanical efficiency of the apparatus is quite high due to minimal friction and the small weights that are moved; thus, the output of the oscillator is substantial.

Theoretically considered, when the various advantages which Mr. Tesla holds out are examined, it is surprising, considering the simplicity of the arrangement, that nothing was done in this[Pg 493] direction before. No doubt many inventors, at one time or other, have entertained the idea of generating currents by attaching a coil or a magnetic core to the piston of a steam engine, or generating currents by the vibrations of a tuning fork, or similar devices, but the disadvantages of such arrangements from an engineering standpoint must be obvious. Mr. Tesla, however, in the introductory remarks of his lecture, pointed out how by a series of conclusions he was driven to take up this new line of work by the necessity of producing currents of constant period and as a result of his endeavors to maintain electrical oscillation in the most simple and economical manner.

When you think about it, it's surprising that no one did anything about the various advantages that Mr. Tesla proposes, especially given how simple his setup is. Sure, many inventors have thought about generating currents by connecting a coil or magnetic core to a steam engine piston, or by using the vibrations of a tuning fork or similar devices, but the engineering drawbacks of those setups are pretty clear. However, Mr. Tesla, in the opening of his lecture, explained that he was led to pursue this new approach out of a need to produce currents with a constant period, aiming to maintain electrical oscillation in the simplest and most cost-effective way possible.


FOOTNOTES

[1] A lecture delivered before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, at Columbia College, N. Y., May 20, 1891.

[1] A lecture given to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers at Columbia College, New York, on May 20, 1891.

[2] Lecture delivered before the Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, February, 1892.

[2] Lecture presented to the Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, February, 1892.

[3] A lecture delivered before the Franklin Institute, Philadelphia, February, 1893, and before the National Electric Light Association, St. Louis, March, 1893.

[3] A talk given at the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia in February 1893 and at the National Electric Light Association in St. Louis in March 1893.

[4] See pages 153-4 5.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See pages 153-154.

[5] It is thought necessary to remark that, although the induction coil may give quite a good result when operated with such rapidly alternating currents, yet its construction, quite irrespective of the iron core, makes it very unfit for such high frequencies, and to obtain the best results the construction should be greatly modified.

[5] It's important to note that while the induction coil can produce decent results when used with rapidly alternating currents, its design, regardless of the iron core, makes it unsuitable for these high frequencies. To achieve optimal performance, the design needs significant modification.

[6] Article by Mr. Tesla in The Electrical Engineer, N. Y., May 6, 1891.

[6] Article by Mr. Tesla in The Electrical Engineer, N. Y., May 6, 1891.

[7] Article by Mr. Tesla in The Electrical Engineer of Dec. 23d, 1891.

[7] Article by Mr. Tesla in The Electrical Engineer of December 23, 1891.

[8] Article by Mr. Tesla in The Electrical Engineer. N. Y., July 1, 1891.

[8] Article by Mr. Tesla in The Electrical Engineer. New York, July 1, 1891.

[9] Abstract of a paper read before Physical Society of London.

[9] Summary of a paper presented to the Physical Society of London.

[9] Article by Mr. Tesla in The Electrical Engineer, N. Y., August 26, 1891.

[9] Article by Mr. Tesla in The Electrical Engineer, NYC, August 26, 1891.

[10] Note by Prof. J. J. Thomson in the London Electrician, July 24, 1891.

[10] Note by Prof. J. J. Thomson in the London Electrician, July 24, 1891.

[11] Mr. Tesla's experiments, as the careful reader of his three lectures will perceive, have revealed a very important fact which is taken advantage of in this invention. Namely, he has shown that in a condenser a considerable amount of energy may be wasted, and the condenser may break down merely because gaseous matter is present between the surfaces. A number of experiments are described in the lectures, which bring out this fact forcibly and serve as a guide in the operation of high tension apparatus. But besides bearing upon this point, these experiments also throw a light upon investigations of a purely scientific nature and explain now the lack of harmony among the observations of various investigators. Mr. Tesla shows that in a fluid such as oil the losses are very small as compared with those incurred in a gas.

[11] Mr. Tesla's experiments, as careful readers of his three lectures will notice, have uncovered a crucial fact that is utilized in this invention. Specifically, he has demonstrated that a significant amount of energy can be wasted in a capacitor, and the capacitor can fail simply because gas is present between the surfaces. Several experiments detailed in the lectures highlight this point clearly and serve as guidance for operating high-voltage equipment. In addition to addressing this issue, these experiments also shed light on purely scientific investigations and clarify the inconsistencies among various researchers' observations. Mr. Tesla illustrates that in a substance like oil, the energy losses are much smaller compared to those experienced in a gas.

[12] It will, of course, be inferred from the nature of these devices that the vibration obtained in this manner is very slow owing to the inability of the iron to follow rapid changes in temperature. In an interview with Mr. Tesla on this subject, the compiler learned of an experiment which will interest students. A simple horseshoe magnet is taken and a piece of sheet iron bent in the form of an L is brought in contact with one of the poles and placed in such a position that it is kept in the attraction of the opposite pole delicately suspended. A spirit lamp is placed under the sheet iron piece and when the iron is heated to a certain temperature it is easily set in vibration oscillating as rapidly as 400 to 500 times a minute. The experiment is very easily performed and is interesting principally on account of the very rapid rate of vibration.

[12] It's clear from these devices that the vibration produced this way is quite slow, as the iron can't keep up with quick temperature changes. In a conversation with Mr. Tesla about this, the compiler learned of an experiment that would pique the interest of students. A simple horseshoe magnet is used, and a piece of sheet iron shaped like an L is placed in contact with one of the poles, positioned such that it remains delicately suspended by the attraction of the opposite pole. A spirit lamp is set under the sheet iron, and when the iron is heated to a certain temperature, it starts to vibrate easily, oscillating as quickly as 400 to 500 times per minute. This experiment is easy to perform and is particularly fascinating because of the very high rate of vibration.

[13] The chief point to be noted is that Mr. Tesla attacked this problem in a way which was, from the standpoint of theory, and that of an engineer, far better than that from which some earlier trials in this direction started. The enlargement of these ideas will be found in Mr. Tesla's work on the pyromagnetic generator, treated in this chapter. The chief effort of the inventor was to economize the heat, which was accomplished by inclosing the iron in a source of heat well insulated, and by cooling the iron by means of steam, utilizing the steam over again. The construction also permits of more rapid magnetic changes per unit of time, meaning larger output.

[13] The main point to note is that Mr. Tesla tackled this problem in a way that was, theoretically and from an engineering perspective, much better than the approaches taken in earlier attempts. The expansion of these ideas can be found in Mr. Tesla's work on the pyromagnetic generator discussed in this chapter. The inventor's primary goal was to conserve heat, which he achieved by enclosing the iron in a well-insulated heat source and by cooling the iron using steam, recycling the steam in the process. This design also allows for quicker magnetic changes per unit of time, resulting in a higher output.

[14] The compiler has learned partially from statements made on several occasions in journals and partially by personal inquiry of Mr. Tesla, that a great deal of work in this interesting line is unpublished. In these inventions as will be seen, the brushes are automatically shifted, but in the broad method barely suggested here the regulation is effected without any change in the position of the brushes. This auxiliary brush invention, it will be remembered, was very much discussed a few years ago, and it may be of interest that this work of Mr. Tesla, then unknown in this field, is now brought to light.

[14] The compiler has learned partly from statements in various journals and partly through personal inquiries with Mr. Tesla that there’s a significant amount of unpublished work in this fascinating area. In these inventions, as will be shown, the brushes are automatically shifted, but in the broader method only hinted at here, regulation occurs without any adjustment to the position of the brushes. This auxiliary brush invention, as a reminder, was widely discussed a few years ago, and it may be noteworthy that Mr. Tesla's work, which was then not recognized in this field, is now being revealed.

[15] Article by Mr. Tesla, contributed to The Electrical Engineer, N. Y., Sept. 2, 1891.

[15] Article by Mr. Tesla, contributed to The Electrical Engineer, N.Y., Sept. 2, 1891.

[16] Mr. Tesla here refers to an interesting article which appeared in July, 1865, in the Phil. Magazine, by Sir W. Thomson, in which Sir William, speaking of his "uniform electric current accumulator," assumes that for self-excitation it is desirable to subdivide the disc into an infinite number of infinitely thin spokes, in order to prevent diffusion of the current. Mr. Tesla shows that diffusion is absolutely necessary for the excitation and that when the disc is subdivided no excitation can occur.

[16] Mr. Tesla refers to an interesting article that was published in July 1865, in the Phil. Magazine, by Sir W. Thomson. In this article, Sir William discusses his "uniform electric current accumulator" and suggests that for self-excitation, it is beneficial to divide the disc into an infinite number of infinitely thin spokes to prevent current diffusion. Mr. Tesla argues that diffusion is actually essential for excitation, and when the disc is divided, no excitation can take place.

[17] See Part I, Chap. III, page 9.

[17] See Part I, Chap. III, page 9.

[18] See Part II, Chap. XXVI., page 145.

[18] See Part II, Chap. 26, page 145.


INDEX.

Alternate Current Electrostatic Apparatus392
Alternating Current Generators for High Frequency152, 374, 224
Alternating Motors and Transformers7
American Institute Electrical Engineers Lecture145
Anthony, W. A., Tests of Tesla Motors8
Apparatus for Producing High Vacua276
Arc Lighting, Tesla Direct, System451
Auxiliary Brush Regulation438
Biography, Tesla4
Brush, Anti-Sparking432
Brush, Third, Regulation438
Brush, Phenomena in High Vacuum226
Carborundum Button for Tesla Lamps140, 253
Commutator, Anti-Sparking432
Combination of Synchronizing and Torque Motor95
Condensers with Plates in Oil418
Conversion with Disruptive Discharge193, 204, 303
Current or Dynamic Electricity Phenomena327
Direct Current Arc Lighting451
Dischargers, Forms of305
Disruptive Discharge Coil207, 221
Disruptive Discharge Phenomena212
Dynamos, Improved Direct Current448
Early Phase Motors477
Effects with High Frequency and High Potential Currents119
Electrical Congress Lecture, Chicago486
Electric Resonance340
Electric Discharges in Vacuum Tubes396
Electrolytic Registering Meter420
Eye, Observations on the294
Flames, Electrostatic, Non-Consuming166, 272
Forbes Unipolar Generator468, 474
Franklin Institute Lecture294
Generators, Pyromagnetic429
High Potential, High Frequency:
    Brush Phenomena in High Vacuum226
    Carborundum Buttons140, 253
    Disruptive Discharge Phenomena212
    Flames, Electrostatic, Non-Consuming166, 272
    Impedance, Novel Phenomena194, 338
    Lighting Lamps Through Body359
    Luminous Effects with Gases368
    "Massage" with Currents394
    Motor with Single Wire234, 330
    "No Wire" Motors235
    Oil Insulation of Induction Coils173, 221
    [Pg 495]Ozone, Production of171
    Phosphorescence367
    Physiological Effects162, 394
    Resonance340
    Spinning Filament168
    Streaming Discharges of High Tension Coil155, 163
    Telegraphy without Wires346
Impedance, Novel Phenomena194, 338
Improvements in Unipolar Generators465
Improved Direct Current Dynamos and Motors448
Induction Motors92
Institution Electrical Engineers Lecture198
Lamps and Motor operated on a Single Wire330
Lamps with Single Straight Fiber183
Lamps containing only a Gas188
Lamps with Refractory Button177, 239, 360
Lamps for Simple Phosphorescence187, 282, 364
Lecture, Tesla before:
    American Institute Electrical Engineers145
    Royal Institution124
    Institution Electrical Engineers198
    Franklin Institute and National Electric Light Association294
    Electrical Congress, Chicago486
Lighting Lamps Through the Body359
Light Phenomena with High Frequencies349
Luminous Effects with Gases at Low-Pressure368
"Magnetic Lag" Motor67
"Massage" with Currents of High Frequency394
Mechanical and Electrical Oscillators486
Method of obtaining Direct from Alternating currents409
Method of obtaining Difference of Phase by Magnetic Shielding71
Motors:
    With Circuits of Different Resistance79
    With Closed Conductors9
    Combination of Synchronizing and Torque95
    With Condenser in Armature Circuit101
    With Condenser in one of the Field Circuits106
    With Coinciding Maxima of Magnetic Effect in Armature and Field83
    With "Current Lag" Artificially Secured58
    Early Phase477
    With Equal Magnetic Energies in Field and Armature81
    Or Generator, obtaining Desired Speed of36
    Improved Direct Current448
    Induction92
    "Magnetic Lag"67
    "No Wire"235
    With Phase Difference in Magnetization of Inner and Outer Parts of Core88
    Regulator for Rotary Current45
    Single Circuit, Self-starting Synchronizing50
    Single Phase76
    With Single Wire to Generator234, 330
    Synchronizing9
    Thermo-Magnetic424
    Utilizing Continuous Current Generators31
National Electric Light Association Lecture294
"No Wire" Motor235
Observations on the Eye294
Oil, Condensers with Plates in418
Oil Insulation of Induction Coils173, 221
Oscillators, Mechanical and Electrical486
[Pg 496]Ozone, Production of171
Phenomena Produced by Electrostatic Force318
Phosphorescence and Sulphide of Zinc367
Physiological Effects of High Frequency162, 394
Polyphase Systems26
Polyphase Transformer109
Pyromagnetic Generators429
Regulator for Rotary Current Motors45
Resonance, Electric, Phenomena of340
"Resultant Attraction"7
Rotating Field Transformers9
Rotating Magnetic Field9
Royal Institution Lecture124
Scope of Lectures119
Single Phase Motor76
Single Circuit, Self-Starting Synchronizing Motors50
Spinning Filament Effects168
Streaming Discharges of High Tension Coil155, 163
Synchronizing Motors9
Telegraphy without Wires346
Transformer with Shield between Primary and Secondary113
Thermo-Magnetic Motors424
Thomson, J. J., on Vacuum Tubes397, 402, 406
Thomson, Sir W., Current Accumulator471
Transformers:
    Alternating7
    Magnetic Shield113
    Polyphase109
    Rotating Field9
Tubes:
    Coated with Yttria, etc.187
    Coated with Sulphide of Zinc, etc.290, 367
Unipolar Generators465
Unipolar Generator, Forbes468, 474
Yttria, Coated Tubes187
Zinc, Tubes Coated with Sulphide of367



        
        
    
Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!