This is a modern-English version of The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Isaiah, Volume 1 (of 2), originally written by Smith, George Adam.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
THE EXPOSITOR'S BIBLE
EDITED BY THE REV.
EDITED BY REV.
SIR W. ROBERTSON NICOLL, M.A., LL.D.
Editor of "The Expositor," etc.
Editor of "The Expositor," etc.
THE BOOK OF ISAIAH
BY THE REV.
BY REV.
GEORGE ADAM SMITH, M.A.
VOLUME 1.
HODDER AND STOUGHTON
LONDON. MCMX
VOLUME 1.
HODDER AND STOUGHTON
LONDON. 1910
THE
BOOK OF ISAIAH
BY THE REV.
BY REV.
GEORGE ADAM SMITH, M.A., D.D.
Professor of Hebrew in the Free Church College, Glasgow
IN TWO VOLUMES
VOL. I.—ISAIAH I.-XXXIX.
TWENTIETH EDITION
HODDER AND STOUGHTON
LONDON. MCMX
Professor of Hebrew at the Free Church College, Glasgow
IN TWO VOLUMES
VOL. I.—ISAIAH I.-XXXIX.
TWENTIETH EDITION
HODDER AND STOUGHTON
LONDON. 1910
Printed by Hazell, Watson & Viney, Ltd., London and Aylesbury.
Printed by Hazell, Watson & Viney, Ltd., London and Aylesbury.
CONTENTS.
PAGE | ||
Intro | ix | |
Schedule of Dates | xvi | |
BOOK I. | ||
ISAIAH'S PREFACE AND PROPHECIES TO | ||
THE DEATH OF AHAZ, 727 BCE | ||
CHAP. | ||
I. | ISAIAH'S PREFACE—THE ARGUMENT OF THE LORD. | 3 |
Isaiah i. | ||
II. | THE THREE JERUSALEMS | 19 |
Isaiah ii.-iv. 740-735 B.C. | ||
III. | THE VINEYARD OF THE LORD | 35 |
Isaiah v.; ix. 8-x. 4. 735 B.C.E. | ||
IV. | ISAIAH'S CALL AND CONSECRATION | 57 |
Isaiah vi. 740. Written 735 or 727 BCE (?). | ||
V. | THE WORLD IN ISAIAH'S DAY AND ISRAEL'S GOD | 91 |
With a map. | ||
VI. | KING AND MESSIAH; PEOPLE AND CHURCH | 103 |
Isaiah vii.-ix. 1-8. 735-732 B.C.E. | ||
VII. | THE MESSIAH | 131 |
[vi] | ||
BOOK II. | ||
PROPHECIES FROM THE ACCESSION OF HEZEKIAH | ||
TO THE DEATH OF SARGON, | ||
727-705 B.C. | ||
VIII. | GOD'S COMMONPLACE | 151 |
Isaiah xxviii. Around 725 B.C. | ||
IX. | ATHEISM OF FORCE AND ATHEISM OF FEAR | 168 |
Isaiah x. 5-34. About 721 BCE | ||
X. | THE SPIRIT OF GOD IN MAN AND THE ANIMALS | 179 |
Isaiah xi.; xii. Around 720 B.C. (?). | ||
XI. | DRIFTING TO EGYPT, 720-705 B.C. | 196 |
Isaiah xx. (711 B.C.); xxi. 1-10 (710 B.C.); xxxviii.; xxxix. | ||
BOOK III. | ||
ORATIONS ON INTRIGUES WITH EGYPT, | ||
AND ORACLES ON FOREIGN NATIONS, | ||
705-702 BCE | ||
XII. | ARIEL, ARIEL | 209 |
Isaiah xxix. About 703 BCE | ||
XIII. | POLITICS AND FAITH | 221 |
Isaiah xxx. About 702 BCE | ||
XIV. | THREE TRUTHS ABOUT GOD | 238 |
Isaiah xxxi. About 702 B.C. | ||
XV. | A MAN; OR, CHARACTER AND THE CAPACITY TO | |
DISCRIMINATE CHARACTER | 248 | |
Isaiah xxxii. 1-8. About 702 BCE (?). | ||
XVI. | ISAIAH TO WOMEN | 262 |
Isaiah xxxii. 9-20. Date Unknown. | ||
XVII. | ISAIAH TO THE FOREIGN NATIONS | 271 |
Isaiah xiv. 24-xxi.; xxiii. Multiple Dates. | ||
XVIII. | TYRE; OR, THE MERCENARY SPIRIT | 288 |
Isaiah xxiii. 702 B.C. | ||
[vii]BOOK IV. | ||
JERUSALEM AND SENNACHERIB, 701 B.C. | ||
XIX. | AT THE LOWEST EBB | 306 |
Isaiah i.; xxii. Early in 701 B.C.E. | ||
XX. | THE TURN OF THE TIDE: MORAL EFFECTS OF FORGIVENESS | 320 |
Isaiah xxii.; xxxiii. Later in 701 BC | ||
XXI. | OUR GOD A CONSUMING FIRE | 331 |
Isaiah xxxiii. | ||
XXII. | THE RABSHAKEH; OR, LAST TRIALS OF FAITH | 343 |
Isaiah xxxvi. 701 B.C.E. | ||
XXIII. | THIS IS THE VICTORY ... OUR FAITH | 352 |
Isaiah xxxvii. 701 B.C. | ||
XXIV. | A REVIEW OF ISAIAH'S PREDICTIONS CONCERNING | |
THE DELIVERANCE OF JERUSALEM | 368 | |
XXV. | AN OLD TESTAMENT BELIEVER'S SICK-BED; OR, THE | |
DIFFERENCE CHRIST HAS MADE | 375 | |
Isaiah xxxviii.; xxxix. Date TBD. | ||
XXVI. | HAD ISAIAH A GOSPEL FOR THE INDIVIDUAL? | 389 |
BOOK V. | ||
PROPHECIES NOT RELATING TO ISAIAH'S | ||
TIME. | ||
XXVII. | BABYLON AND LUCIFER | 405 |
Isaiah xii. 12-xiv. 23. Date Unknown. | ||
XXVIII. | THE EFFECT OF SIN ON OUR MATERIAL SURROUNDINGS | 416 |
Isaiah xxiv. Date Unknown. | ||
XXIX. | GOD'S POOR | 428 |
Isaiah xxv.-xxvii.; xxxiv.; xxxv. Dates Unknown. | ||
XXX. | THE RESURRECTION | 444 |
Isaiah xxvi.; xxvii. | ||
Chapters Index | 453 | |
Subject Index | 455 |
INTRODUCTION.
As the following Exposition of the Book of Isaiah does not observe the canonical arrangement of the chapters, a short introduction is necessary upon the plan which has been adopted.
As the following Exposition of the Book of Isaiah doesn’t follow the standard order of the chapters, a brief introduction is needed regarding the approach that has been taken.
The size and the many obscurities of the Book of Isaiah have limited the common use of it in the English tongue to single conspicuous passages, the very brilliance of which has cast their context and original circumstance into deeper shade. The intensity of the gratitude with which men have seized upon the more evangelical passages of Isaiah, as well as the attention which apologists for Christianity have too partially paid to his intimations of the Messiah, has confirmed the neglect of the rest of the Book. But we might as well expect to receive an adequate conception of a great statesman's policy from the epigrams and perorations of his speeches as to appreciate the message, which God has sent to the world through the Book of Isaiah, from a few lectures on isolated, and often dislocated, texts. No book of the Bible is less susceptible of treatment apart from the history out of which it sprang than the Book of Isaiah; and it may be added, that in the Old Testament at least there is none which, when set in its original circumstance[x] and methodically considered as a whole, appeals with greater power to the modern conscience. Patiently to learn how these great prophecies were suggested by, and first met, the actual occasions of human life, is vividly to hear them speaking home to life still.
The size and complexity of the Book of Isaiah have limited its common use in English to just a few well-known passages, whose brilliance has overshadowed their context and original circumstances. The strong appreciation people have for Isaiah's more evangelical passages, along with the attention that Christian apologists have somewhat selectively given to his references to the Messiah, has led to a neglect of the rest of the Book. However, we might as well expect to understand a great statesman's policy from just quotes and highlights of his speeches as to fully grasp the message that God has sent to the world through the Book of Isaiah from only a few discussions on isolated and often out-of-context texts. No book in the Bible is less suited for analysis apart from the history from which it originated than the Book of Isaiah; and it's worth noting that in the Old Testament, at least, there isn't one that, when placed in its original context and considered as a whole, resonates more powerfully with modern sensibilities. To patiently learn how these significant prophecies were inspired by and initially addressed real human experiences is to hear them speak relevantly to our lives today.
I have, therefore, designed an arrangement which embraces all the prophecies, but treats them in chronological order. I will endeavour to render their contents in terms which appeal to the modern conscience; but, in order to be successful, such an endeavour presupposes the exposition of them in relation to the history which gave them birth. In these volumes, therefore, narrative and historical exposition will take precedence of practical application.
I have, therefore, created a structure that incorporates all the prophecies but presents them in chronological order. I will try to express their contents in ways that resonate with today's sensibilities; however, to be effective, this effort depends on explaining them in the context of the history that inspired them. In these volumes, narrative and historical explanation will come before practical application.
Every one knows that the Book of Isaiah breaks into two parts between chaps. xxxix. and xl. Vol. I. of this Exposition covers chaps. i.-xxxix. Vol. II. will treat of chaps. xl.-lxvi. Again, within chaps. i.-xxxix. another division is apparent. The most of these chapters evidently bear upon events within Isaiah's own career, but some imply historical circumstances that did not arise till long after he had passed away. Of the five books into which I have divided Vol. I., the first four contain the prophecies relating to Isaiah's time (740-701 B.C.), and the fifth the prophecies which refer to later events (chaps. xiii.-xiv. 23; xxiv.-xxvii.; xxxiv.; xxxv.).
Everyone knows that the Book of Isaiah is divided into two parts between chapters 39 and 40. Volume I of this Exposition covers chapters 1-39. Volume II will focus on chapters 40-66. Additionally, within chapters 1-39, another division is noticeable. Most of these chapters clearly relate to events during Isaiah's own life, but some suggest historical circumstances that came up long after he had died. Of the five books I've divided Volume I into, the first four include the prophecies relevant to Isaiah's time (740-701 B.C.), while the fifth contains the prophecies referring to later events (chapters 13-14:23; 24-27; 34; 35).
The prophecies, whose subjects fall within Isaiah's times, I have taken in chronological order, with one exception. This exception is chap. i., which, although it published near the end of the prophet's life, I treat of first, because, from its position as well as its[xi] character, it is evidently intended as a preface to the whole book. The difficulty of grouping the rest of Isaiah's oracles and orations is great. The plan I have adopted is not perfect, but convenient. Isaiah's prophesying was determined chiefly by four Assyrian invasions of Palestine: the first, in 734-732 B.C., by Tiglath-pileser II., while Ahaz was on the throne; the second by Salmanassar and Sargon in 725-720, during which Samaria fell in 721; the third by Sargon, 712-710; the fourth by Sennacherib in 701, which last three occurred while Hezekiah was king of Judah. But outside the Assyrian invasions there were three other cardinal dates in Isaiah's life: 740, his call to be a prophet; 727, the death of Ahaz, his enemy, and the accession of his pupil, Hezekiah; and 705, the death of Sargon, for Sargon's death led to the rebellion of the Syrian States, and it was this rebellion which brought on Sennacherib's invasion. Taking all these dates into consideration, I have placed in Book I. all the prophecies of Isaiah from his call in 740 to the death of Ahaz in 727; they lead up to and illustrate Tiglath-pileser's invasion; they cover what I have ventured to call the prophet's apprenticeship, during which the theatre of his vision was mainly the internal life of his people, but he gained also his first outlook upon the world beyond. Book II. deals with the prophecies from the accession of Hezekiah in 727 to the death of Sargon in 705—a long period, but few prophecies, covering both Salmanassar's and Sargon's campaigns. Book III. is filled with the prophecies from 705 to 702, a numerous group, called forth from Isaiah by the rebellion and political activity in[xii] Palestine consequent on Sargon's death and preliminary to Sennacherib's arrival. Book IV. contains the prophecies which refer to Sennacherib's actual invasion of Judah and siege of Jerusalem, in 701.
The prophecies that relate to Isaiah's time are organized chronologically, with one exception. This exception is chapter 1, which, although it was written near the end of the prophet's life, I discuss first because it serves as a clear introduction to the entire book. Grouping the rest of Isaiah's messages and speeches is quite challenging. The method I've chosen isn't perfect, but it's practical. Isaiah's prophecies were mainly influenced by four Assyrian invasions of Palestine: the first from 734-732 B.C. by Tiglath-pileser II., while Ahaz was king; the second by Salmanassar and Sargon from 725-720, during which Samaria fell in 721; the third by Sargon from 712-710; and the fourth by Sennacherib in 701, the last three happening while Hezekiah was king of Judah. In addition to the Assyrian invasions, there are three other key dates in Isaiah's life: 740, when he was called to be a prophet; 727, the death of his adversary Ahaz and the rise of his pupil Hezekiah; and 705, the death of Sargon, which led to the rebellion of the Syrian States and, consequently, Sennacherib's invasion. Considering all these dates, I have included in Book I all of Isaiah's prophecies from his call in 740 to the death of Ahaz in 727; these prophecies set the stage for and illustrate Tiglath-pileser's invasion. They cover what I’ve labeled as the prophet's apprenticeship, during which his vision was primarily focused on the internal life of his people, although he also gained his first perspectives on the wider world. Book II addresses the prophecies from Hezekiah’s ascension in 727 to Sargon’s death in 705—this is a lengthy period, but it contains few prophecies, addressing both Salmanassar's and Sargon's campaigns. Book III includes the numerous prophecies from 705 to 702, triggered by the rebellion and political activity in Palestine following Sargon's death and leading up to Sennacherib's arrival. Book IV features the prophecies that pertain to Sennacherib's actual invasion of Judah and the siege of Jerusalem in 701.
Of course, any chronological arrangement of Isaiah's prophecies must be largely provisional. Only some of the chapters are fixed to dates past possibility of doubt. The Assyriology which has helped us with these must yield further results before the controversies can be settled that exist with regard to the rest. I have explained in the course of the Exposition my reasons for the order which I have followed, and need only say here that I am still more uncertain about the generally received dates of chaps x. 5-xi., xvii. 12-14 and xxxii. The religious problems, however, were so much the same during the whole of Isaiah's career that uncertainties of date, if they are confined to the limits of that career, make little difference to the exposition of the book.
Of course, any chronological arrangement of Isaiah's prophecies has to be mostly temporary. Only a few chapters are tied to dates that are beyond doubt. The study of Assyriology, which has assisted us with this, needs to provide more results before we can resolve the ongoing debates about the rest. I have outlined my reasons for the order I've followed throughout the Exposition, and I just want to add that I’m even less sure about the commonly accepted dates of chapters 10:5-11, 17:12-14, and 32. However, the religious issues were so similar throughout Isaiah's lifetime that uncertainties about dates, as long as they fall within that time frame, don’t significantly affect the interpretation of the book.
Isaiah's doctrines, being so closely connected with the life of his day, come up for statement at many points of the narrative, in which this Exposition chiefly consists. But here and there I have inserted chapters dealing summarily with more important topics, such as The World in Isaiah's Day; The Messiah; Isaiah's Power of Prediction, with its evidence on the character of Inspiration; and the question, Had Isaiah a Gospel for the Individual? A short index will guide the student to Isaiah's teaching on other important points of theology and life, such as holiness, forgiveness, monotheism, immortality, the Holy Spirit, etc.
Isaiah's teachings, being closely tied to the life of his time, are highlighted at various points in the narrative that this Exposition primarily consists of. However, I've also included chapters that briefly cover significant topics, such as The World in Isaiah's Day; The Messiah; Isaiah's Predictive Power, along with its implications for understanding Inspiration; and the question, Did Isaiah have a Gospel for the Individual? A short index will help students find Isaiah's teachings on other key theological and life topics, like holiness, forgiveness, monotheism, immortality, the Holy Spirit, and more.
Treating Isaiah's prophecies chronologically as I[xiii] have done, I have followed a method which put me on the look-out for any traces of development that his doctrine might exhibit. I have recorded these as they occur, but it may be useful to collect them here. In chaps. ii.-iv. we have the struggle of the apprentice prophet's thoughts from the easy religious optimism of his generation, through unrelieved convictions of judgement for the whole people, to his final vision of the Divine salvation of a remnant. Again, chap. vii. following on chaps. ii.-vi. proves that Isaiah's belief in the Divine righteousness preceded, and was the parent of, his belief in the Divine sovereignty. Again, his successive pictures of the Messiah grow in contents, and become more spiritual. And again, he only gradually arrived at a clear view of the siege and deliverance of Jerusalem. One other fact of the same kind has impressed me since I wrote the exposition of chap. i. I have there stated that it is plain that Isaiah's conscience was perfect just because it consisted of two complementary parts: one of God the infinitely High, exalted in righteousness, far above the thoughts of His people, and the other of God the infinitely Near, concerned and jealous for all the practical details of their life. I ought to have added that Isaiah was more under the influence of the former in his earlier years, but that as he grew older and took a larger share in the politics of Judah it was the latter view of God, to which he most frequently gave expression. Signs of a development like these may be fairly used to correct or support the evidence which Assyriology affords for determining the chronological order of the chapters.
Treating Isaiah's prophecies in chronological order as I[xiii] have done, I have used a method that made me look for any signs of development in his teachings. I’ve noted these as they appear, but it might be helpful to gather them here. In chaps. ii.-iv., we see the struggles of the young prophet's thoughts moving from the easy religious optimism of his time, through unwavering beliefs about judgment for the entire people, to his ultimate vision of God’s salvation for a remnant. Similarly, chap. vii., following chaps. ii.-vi., shows that Isaiah's belief in God’s righteousness came first and was the foundation of his belief in God’s sovereignty. Additionally, his descriptions of the Messiah evolve over time, becoming richer and more spiritual. He also developed a clearer understanding of the siege and deliverance of Jerusalem gradually. One more fact has struck me since I wrote the commentary on chap. i. I've noted that Isaiah’s conscience was sound because it consisted of two complementary parts: one view of God as the infinitely High, exalted in righteousness and far above the thoughts of His people, and the other of God as the infinitely Near, concerned and passionate about the practical details of their lives. I should have added that Isaiah was more influenced by the first view in his younger years, but as he grew older and became more involved in Judah's politics, he often expressed the latter view of God. Signs of developments like these can be useful in correcting or supporting the evidence that Assyriology provides for determining the chronological order of the chapters.
[xiv]But these signs of development are more valuable for the proof they give that the Book of Isaiah contains the experience and testimony of a real life: a life that learned and suffered and grew, and at last triumphed. There is not a single word about the prophet's birth or childhood, or fortune, or personal appearance, or even of his death. But between silence on his origin and silence on his end—and perhaps all the more impressively because of these clouds by which it is bounded—there shines the record of Isaiah's spiritual life and of the unfaltering career which this sustained,—clear and whole, from his commission by God in the secret experience of his own heart to his vindication in God's supreme tribunal of history. It is not only one of the greatest, but one of the most finished and intelligible, lives in history. My main purpose in expounding the book is to enable English readers, not only to follow its course, but to feel, and to be elevated by, its Divine inspiration.
[xiv]But these signs of growth are more valuable because they prove that the Book of Isaiah reflects a genuine life: a life that learned, suffered, evolved, and ultimately succeeded. There’s no mention of the prophet's birth, childhood, circumstances, physical appearance, or even his death. Yet, between the silence regarding his beginnings and his end—and perhaps even more striking because of this surrounding mystery—shines the account of Isaiah's spiritual journey and the unwavering path that supported it, clear and complete, from his calling by God in the intimate experience of his own heart to his justification in God's ultimate judgment of history. It is not only one of the greatest but also one of the most polished and understandable lives in history. My main goal in explaining the book is to help English readers not only follow its narrative but also to feel and be uplifted by its Divine inspiration.
I may state that this Exposition is based upon a close study of the Hebrew text of Isaiah, and that the translations are throughout my own, except in one or two cases where I have quoted from the revised English version.
I can say that this Exposition is based on a detailed study of the Hebrew text of Isaiah, and that the translations are all my own, except for a couple of instances where I have quoted from the revised English version.
With regard to the Revised Version of Isaiah, which I have had opportunities of thoroughly testing, I would like to say that my sense of the immense service which it renders to English readers of the Bible is only exceeded by my wonder that the Revisers have not gone just a very little farther, and adopted one or two simple contrivances which are in the line of their own improvements and would have greatly increased our[xv] large debt to them. For instance, why did they not make plain by inverted commas such undoubted interruptions of the prophet's own speech as that of the drunkards in chap. xxviii. 9, 10? Not to know that these verses are spoken in mockery of Isaiah, a mockery to which he replies in vv. 10-13, is to miss the meaning of the whole passage. Again, when they printed Job and the Psalms in metrical form, as well as the Hymn of Hezekiah, why did they not do the same with other poetical passages of Isaiah, particularly the great Ode on the King of Babylon in chap. xiv.? This is utterly spoiled in the form in which the Revisers have printed it. What English reader would guess that it was as much a piece of metre as any of the Psalms? Again, why have they so consistently rendered by the misleading word "judgement" a Hebrew term that no doubt sometimes means an act of doom, but far oftener the abstract quality of justice? It is such defects, along with a frequent failure to mark the proper emphasis in a sentence, that have led me to substitute a more literal version of my own.
Regarding the Revised Version of Isaiah, which I have thoroughly examined, I want to express that my appreciation for the significant service it provides to English readers of the Bible is only surpassed by my astonishment that the Revisers didn't go a bit further and adopt a couple of simple changes that align with their own improvements and would have greatly increased our[xv] substantial debt to them. For instance, why didn't they clarify with quotation marks the obvious interruptions of the prophet's own speech, such as that of the drunkards in chap. xxviii. 9, 10? Not recognizing that these verses are spoken in mockery of Isaiah, to which he responds in vv. 10-13, misses the essence of the entire passage. Additionally, when they published Job and the Psalms in metrical form, along with the Hymn of Hezekiah, why didn't they do the same with other poetic sections of Isaiah, especially the great Ode on the King of Babylon in chap. xiv.? The way the Revisers have printed it utterly ruins its form. What English reader would guess that it is just as much a piece of meter as any of the Psalms? Furthermore, why have they consistently translated a Hebrew term with the misleading word "judgement," which sometimes means an act of doom but more often refers to the abstract concept of justice? These shortcomings, along with a frequent failure to indicate the proper emphasis in a sentence, have led me to create a more literal version of my own.
I have not thought it necessary to discuss the question of the chronology of the period. This has been done so often and so recently. See Robertson Smith's Prophets of Israel, pp. 145, 402, 413, Driver's Isaiah, p. 12, or any good commentary.
I didn't think it was necessary to talk about the timing of that period. It's been covered so many times and recently too. Check out Robertson Smith's Prophets of Israel, pp. 145, 402, 413, Driver's Isaiah, p. 12, or any good commentary.
I append a chronological table, and an index to the canonical chapters will be found before the index of subjects. The publishers have added a map of Isaiah's world in illustration of chap. v.
I’ve attached a timeline, and you’ll find an index to the official chapters before the subject index. The publishers have included a map of Isaiah's world to illustrate chapter v.
TABLE OF DATES.
B.C.
B.C.
745. Tiglath-pileser II. ascends the Assyrian Throne.
745. Tiglath-pileser II. takes the Assyrian throne.
740. Uzziah dies. Jotham becomes sole King of Judah. Isaiah's Inaugural Vision (Isa. vi.).
740. Uzziah dies. Jotham becomes the sole King of Judah. Isaiah's Inaugural Vision (Isa. vi.).
735. Jotham dies. Ahaz succeeds. League of Syria and Northern Israel against Judah.
735. Jotham dies. Ahaz takes over. An alliance of Syria and Northern Israel forms against Judah.
734-732. Syrian Campaign of Tiglath-pileser II. Siege and Capture of Damascus. Invasion of Israel. Captivity of Zebulon, Naphtali and Galilee (Isa. ix. 1). Ahaz visits Damascus.
734-732. Syrian Campaign of Tiglath-pileser II. Siege and Capture of Damascus. Invasion of Israel. Captivity of Zebulon, Naphtali, and Galilee (Isa. ix. 1). Ahaz visits Damascus.
727. Salmanassar IV. succeeds Tiglath-pileser II. Hezekiah succeeds Ahaz (or in 725?).
727. Salmanassar IV succeeds Tiglath-pileser II. Hezekiah takes over from Ahaz (or in 725?).
725. Salmanassar marches on Syria.
725. Salmanassar invades Syria.
722 or 721. Sargon succeeds Salmanassar. Capture of Samaria.
Captivity of all Northern Israel.
722 or 721. Sargon takes over from Salmanassar. Samaria is captured.
All of Northern Israel is taken into captivity.
720 or 719. Sargon defeats Egypt at Rafia.
720 or 719. Sargon beats Egypt at Rafia.
711. Sargon invades Syria (Isa. xx.). Capture of Ashdod.
711. Sargon invades Syria (Isa. 20). Capture of Ashdod.
709. Sargon takes Babylon from Merodach-baladan.
709. Sargon takes Babylon from Merodach-baladan.
705. Murder of Sargon. Sennacherib succeeds.
705. Murder of Sargon. Sennacherib takes over.
701. Sennacherib invades Syria. Capture of Coast Towns. Siege of Ekron and Battle of Eltekeh. Invasion of Judah. Submission of Hezekiah. Jerusalem spared. Return of Assyrians with the Rabshakeh to Jerusalem, while Sennacherib's Army marches on Egypt. Disaster to Sennacherib's Army near Pelusium. Disappearance of Assyrians from before Jerusalem—all happening in this order.
701. Sennacherib invades Syria. Capture of coastal towns. Siege of Ekron and battle of Eltekeh. Invasion of Judah. Hezekiah surrenders. Jerusalem is spared. The Assyrians return with the Rabshakeh to Jerusalem, while Sennacherib's army marches on Egypt. Disaster strikes Sennacherib's army near Pelusium. The Assyrians disappear from before Jerusalem—all taking place in this order.
697 or 696. Death of Hezekiah. Manasseh succeeds.
697 or 696. Death of Hezekiah. Manasseh takes over.
681. Death of Sennacherib.
681. Death of Sennacherib.
607. Fall of Nineveh and Assyria. Babylon supreme. Jeremiah.
607. Fall of Nineveh and Assyria. Babylon takes control. Jeremiah.
599. First Deportation of Jews to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar.
599. First Deportation of Jews to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar.
588. Jerusalem destroyed. Second Deportation of Jews.
588. Jerusalem destroyed. Second Deportation of Jews.
538. Cyrus captures Babylon. First Return of Jewish Exiles, under Zerubbabel, happens soon after.
538. Cyrus captures Babylon. The first return of Jewish exiles, led by Zerubbabel, occurs shortly after.
458. Second Return of Jewish Exiles, under Ezra.
458. Second Return of Jewish Exiles, under Ezra.
BOOK I
PREFACE AND PROPHECIES TO THE DEATH OF AHAZ,
727 B.C.
727 B.C.
ISAIAH: | i. The Introduction. |
" | ii.-iv. 740-735 B.C. |
" | v., ix. 8-x. 4. 735 B.C.E. |
" | vi. About 735 B.C.E. |
" | vii.-ix. 7. 734-732 B.C. |
CHAPTER I.
THE ARGUMENT OF THE LORD AND ITS CONCLUSION.
Isaiah i.—His General Preface.
Isaiah i.—General Preface.
The first chapter of the Book of Isaiah owes its position not to its date, but to its character. It was published late in the prophet's life. The seventh verse describes the land as overrun by foreign soldiery, and such a calamity befell Judah only in the last two of the four reigns over which the first verse extends Isaiah's prophesying. In the reign of Ahaz, Judah was invaded by Syria and Northern Israel, and some have dated chapter i. from the year of that invasion, 734 B.C. In the reign again of Hezekiah some have imagined, in order to account for the chapter, a swarming of neighbouring tribes upon Judah; and Mr. Cheyne, to whom regarding the history of Isaiah's time we ought to listen with the greatest deference, has supposed an Assyrian invasion in 711, under Sargon. But hardly of this, and certainly not of that, have we adequate evidence, and the only other invasion of Judah in Isaiah's lifetime took place under Sennacherib, in 701. For many reasons this Assyrian invasion is to be preferred to that by Syria and Ephraim in 734 as the occasion of this prophecy. But there is really no need to be determined on the point. The prophecy has been lifted out of its original circumstance[4] and placed in the front of the book, perhaps by Isaiah himself, as a general introduction to his collected pieces. It owes its position, as we have said, to its character. It is a clear, complete statement of the points which were at issue between the Lord and His own all the time Isaiah was the Lord's prophet. It is the most representative of Isaiah's prophecies, a summary, perhaps better than any other single chapter of the Old Testament, of the substance of prophetic doctrine, and a very vivid illustration of the prophetic spirit and method. We propose to treat it here as introductory to the main subjects and lines of Isaiah's teaching, leaving its historical references till we arrive in due course at the probable year of its origin, 701 B.C.[1]
The first chapter of the Book of Isaiah is positioned where it is not because of when it was written, but due to its content. It was published later in the prophet's life. The seventh verse describes the land as being overrun by foreign soldiers, a disaster that only struck Judah during the last two of the four reigns that the first verse covers regarding Isaiah's prophecies. During Ahaz's reign, Judah was invaded by Syria and Northern Israel, and some believe chapter 1 was dated to that invasion in 734 B.C.. In Hezekiah's reign, some have speculated about an influx of neighboring tribes attacking Judah. Mr. Cheyne, whose insights on Isaiah’s historical context deserve great respect, suggested an Assyrian invasion in 711 under Sargon. However, we don’t have enough evidence for this, and the only other invasion of Judah during Isaiah's time occurred under Sennacherib in 701. For various reasons, it's better to associate this prophecy with the Assyrian invasion than with the one by Syria and Ephraim in 734. That said, it’s not crucial to pinpoint this. The prophecy has been extracted from its original setting and positioned at the start of the book, possibly by Isaiah himself, as a general introduction to his collected works. Its placement, as we mentioned, is due to its character. It provides a clear and complete overview of the issues between the Lord and His people throughout Isaiah's prophethood. It is the most representative of Isaiah's prophecies and serves as an excellent summary of prophetic doctrine, and it vividly illustrates the prophetic spirit and method. We plan to discuss it here as an introduction to the main themes and ideas of Isaiah's teachings, postponing its historical references until we reach the likely period of its creation, 701 B.C.[1]
Isaiah's preface is in the form of a Trial or Assize. Ewald calls it "The Great Arraignment." There are all the actors in a judicial process. It is a Crown case, and God is at once Plaintiff and Judge. He delivers both the Complaint in the beginning (vv. 2, 3) and the Sentence in the end. The Assessors are Heaven and Earth, whom the Lord's herald invokes to hear the Lord's plea (ver. 2). The people of Judah are the Defendants. The charge against them is one of brutish, ingrate stupidity, breaking out into rebellion. The Witness is the prophet himself, whose evidence on the guilt of his people consists in recounting the misery that has overtaken their land (vv. 4-9), along with their civic injustice and social cruelty—sins of the upper and ruling classes (vv. 10, 17, 21-23). The people's Plea-in-defence, laborious worship and multiplied sacrifice, is repelled and exposed (vv. 10-17). And the Trial is concluded—Come now, let us bring our reasoning[5] to a close, saith the Lord—by God's offer of pardon to a people thoroughly convicted (ver. 18). On which follow the Conditions of the Future: happiness is sternly made dependent on repentance and righteousness (vv. 19, 20). And a supplementary oracle is given (vv. 24-31), announcing a time of affliction, through which the nation shall pass as through a furnace; rebels and sinners shall be consumed, but God will redeem Zion, and with her a remnant of the people.
Isaiah's introduction is presented as a trial. Ewald refers to it as "The Great Arraignment." All the key players in a legal process are involved. It’s a serious case, with God acting as both the Plaintiff and the Judge. He introduces the Complaint at the start (vv. 2, 3) and delivers the Judgment at the end. The Assessors are Heaven and Earth, whom the Lord's messenger calls upon to hear His argument (ver. 2). The people of Judah are the Defendants. They are accused of being mindless and ungrateful, leading to rebellion. The Witness is the prophet himself, whose testimony about his people's guilt includes the suffering that has come to their land (vv. 4-9) and their social injustices and harshness—sins committed by the elite and ruling classes (vv. 10, 17, 21-23). The people's defense, their burdensome rituals and countless sacrifices, is dismissed and exposed (vv. 10-17). The trial concludes—Come now, let us bring our reasoning[5] to a close, says the Lord—with God's offer of forgiveness to a people found guilty (ver. 18). This is followed by the Conditions for the Future: happiness is sternly conditioned on repentance and righteousness (vv. 19, 20). An additional prophecy is given (vv. 24-31), announcing a time of hardship, through which the nation will pass like through a furnace; rebels and sinners will be burned away, but God will redeem Zion and a remnant of the people along with her.
That is the plan of the chapter—a Trial at Law. Though it disappears under the exceeding weight of thought the prophet builds upon it, do not let us pass hurriedly from it, as if it were only a scaffolding.
That’s the plan of the chapter—a Trial at Law. Even though it gets overshadowed by the heavy thoughts the prophet layers on top of it, let’s not rush past it as if it's just temporary support.
That God should argue at all is the magnificent truth on which our attention must fasten, before we inquire what the argument is about. God reasons with man—that is the first article of religion according to Isaiah. Revelation is not magical, but rational and moral. Religion is reasonable intercourse between one intelligent Being and another. God works upon man first through conscience.
That God should argue at all is the amazing truth we need to focus on before we look into what the argument is about. God reasons with man—that's the first principle of religion according to Isaiah. Revelation isn't magical; it's rational and moral. Religion is a reasonable interaction between one intelligent being and another. God first influences man through conscience.
Over against the prophetic view of religion sprawls and reeks in this same chapter the popular—religion as smoky sacrifice, assiduous worship, and ritual. The people to whom the chapter was addressed were not idolaters.[2] Hezekiah's reformation was over. Judah worshipped her own God, whom the prophet introduces not as for the first time, but by Judah's own familiar[6] names for Him—Jehovah, Jehovah of Hosts, the Holy One of Israel, the Mighty One, or Hero, of Israel. In this hour of extreme danger the people are waiting on Jehovah with great pains and cost of sacrifice. They pray, they sacrifice, they solemnize to perfection. But they do not know, they do not consider; this is the burden of their offence. To use a better word, they do not think. They are God's grown-up children (ver. 2)—children, that is to say, like the son of the parable, with native instincts for their God, and grown up—that is to say, with reason and conscience developed. But they use neither, stupider than very beasts. Israel doth not know, my people doth not consider. In all their worship conscience is asleep, and they are drenched in wickedness. Isaiah puts their life in an epigram—wickedness and worship: I cannot away, saith the Lord, with wickedness and worship (ver. 13).
Opposite the prophetic view of religion, in this same chapter, lies the popular idea of religion as smoky sacrifices, constant worship, and rituals. The people this chapter was addressed to were not idolaters.[2] Hezekiah's reforms were complete. Judah worshipped her own God, whom the prophet introduces not for the first time, but by names familiar to Judah—Jehovah, Jehovah of Hosts, the Holy One of Israel, the Mighty One, or Hero of Israel. In this moment of extreme danger, the people are depending on Jehovah with great effort and cost of sacrifice. They pray, they sacrifice, they perform rituals to perfection. But they do not know, they do not consider; this is the core of their offense. To put it another way, they do not think. They are God's grown-up children (ver. 2)—children, meaning like the son in the parable, with natural instincts for their God, and grown up—meaning, with developed reasoning and conscience. But they use neither, more foolish than animals. Israel does not know, my people do not consider. In all their worship, their conscience is asleep, and they are soaked in wickedness. Isaiah sums up their life in a phrase—wickedness and worship: I cannot bear, says the Lord, wickedness and worship (ver. 13).
But the pressure and stimulus of the prophecy lie in this, that although the people have silenced conscience and are steeped in a stupidity worse than ox or ass, God will not leave them alone. He forces Himself upon them; He compels them to think. In the order and calmness of nature (ver. 2), apart from catastrophe nor seeking to influence by any miracle, God speaks to men by the reasonable words of His prophet. Before He will publish salvation or intimate disaster He must rouse and startle conscience. His controversy precedes alike His peace and His judgements. An awakened conscience is His prophet's first demand. Before religion can be prayer, or sacrifice, or any acceptable worship, it must be a reasoning together with God.
But the pressure and motivation of the prophecy are in this: even though the people have ignored their conscience and are caught up in a foolishness worse than that of an ox or a donkey, God will not leave them alone. He pushes Himself onto them; He forces them to think. In the order and calmness of nature (ver. 2), without any catastrophe or miraculous influence, God communicates with people through the reasonable words of His prophet. Before He announces salvation or hints at disaster, He must awaken and shock their conscience. His dispute comes before both His peace and His judgments. An awakened conscience is the prophet's first requirement. Before religion can be prayer, sacrifice, or any form of acceptable worship, it must be a reasoning together with God.
That is what mean the arrival of the Lord, and the opening of the assize, and the call to know and consider.[7] It is the terrible necessity which comes back upon men, however engrossed or drugged they may be, to pass their lives in moral judgement before themselves; a debate to which there is never any closure, in which forgotten things will not be forgotten, but a man "is compelled to repeat to himself things he desires to be silent about, and to listen to what he does not wish to hear, ... yielding to that mysterious power which says to him, Think. One can no more prevent the mind from returning to an idea than the sea from returning to a shore. With the sailor this is called the tide; with the guilty it is called remorse. God upheaves the soul as well as the ocean."[3] Upon that ever-returning and resistless tide Hebrew prophecy, with its Divine freight of truth and comfort, rides into the lives of men. This first chapter of Isaiah is just the parable of the awful compulsion to think which men call conscience. The stupidest of generations, formal and fat-hearted, are forced to consider and to reason. The Lord's court and controversy are opened, and men are whipped into them from His Temple and His altar.
That’s what the arrival of the Lord, the start of the trial, and the call to reflect and think means. It’s the awful reality that forces everyone, no matter how distracted or numb they might be, to confront their lives through moral judgment. It’s a conversation that never really ends, where things long forgotten won’t stay forgotten, and a person is "forced to remind themselves of things they wish could stay silent, and to hear what they don’t want to hear,... giving in to that mysterious power that tells them, Think." You can no more stop the mind from revisiting an idea than you can stop the ocean from returning to the shore. For sailors, it’s called the tide; for the guilty, it’s called remorse. God stirs the soul just like He does the ocean. Upon that relentless and unstoppable tide, Hebrew prophecy, loaded with truth and comfort, flows into people’s lives. This first chapter of Isaiah is simply the parable of the terrible urge to think that people call conscience. Even the dullest generations, rigid and unfeeling, are compelled to reflect and reason. The Lord’s court is in session, and people are driven into it from His Temple and His altar.
For even religion and religiousness, the common man's commonest refuge from conscience—not only in Isaiah's time—cannot exempt from this writ. Would we be judged by our moments of worship, by our temple-treading, which is Hebrew for church-going, by the wealth of our sacrifice, by our ecclesiastical position? This chapter drags us out before the austerity and incorruptibleness of Nature. The assessors of the Lord are not the Temple nor the Law, but Heaven and Earth—not ecclesiastical conventions, but the grand moral fundamentals of the universe,[8] purity, order and obedience to God. Religiousness, however, is not the only refuge from which we shall find Isaiah startling men with the trumpet of the Lord's assize. He is equally intolerant of the indulgent silence and compromises of the world, that give men courage to say, We are no worse than others. Men's lives, it is a constant truth of his, have to be argued out not with the world, but with God. If a man will be silent upon shameful and uncomfortable things, he cannot. His thoughts are not his own; God will think them for him as God thinks them here for unthinking Israel. Nor are the practical and intellectual distractions of a busy life any refuge from conscience. When the politicians of Judah seek escape from judgement by plunging into deeper intrigue and a more bustling policy, Isaiah is fond of pointing out to them that they are only forcing judgement nearer. They do but sharpen on other objects the thoughts whose edge must some day turn upon themselves.
Even religion and spirituality, the average person's go-to escape from their conscience—not just in Isaiah's time—can't get them out of this. Should we be evaluated based on our moments of worship, our temple-treading, which means going to church, the value of our sacrifices, or our church positions? This chapter pulls us out to face the strictness and honesty of Nature. The assessors of the Lord aren't the Temple or the Law, but Heaven and Earth—not religious conventions, but the essential moral principles of the universe, [8] purity, order, and obedience to God. However, spirituality isn't the only escape that will lead to Isaiah startling people with the trumpet of the Lord's judgment. He is just as intolerant of the comfortable silence and compromises of the world, which give people the confidence to say, "We are no worse than others." Isaiah constantly insists that people's lives must be debated not with the world, but with God. If someone stays quiet about shameful and uncomfortable matters, they can't hide; their thoughts aren't truly theirs; God will think them for them as God does here for unthinking Israel. The distractions of a busy life—both practical and intellectual—offer no refuge from the conscience. When the politicians of Judah try to escape judgment by diving into more intricate schemes and busy policies, Isaiah is quick to point out that they are just bringing judgment closer. They only sharpen their thoughts on other matters, but those thoughts will eventually turn back on themselves.
What is this questioning nothing holds away, nothing stills, and nothing wears out? It is the voice of God Himself, and its insistence is therefore as irresistible as its effect is universal. That is not mere rhetoric which opens the Lord's controversy: Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth, for the Lord hath spoken. All the world changes to the man in whom conscience lifts up her voice, and to the guilty Nature seems attentive and aware. Conscience compels heaven and earth to act as her assessors, because she is the voice, and they the creatures, of God. This leads us to emphasize another feature of the prophecy.
What is this questioning where nothing holds back, nothing stops, and nothing wears out? It is the voice of God Himself, and its insistence is just as unavoidable as its impact is widespread. This isn't just rhetoric that opens the Lord's debate: Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth, for the Lord hath spoken. The whole world changes for the person whose conscience speaks up, and to the guilty, Nature seems attentive and aware. Conscience makes heaven and earth act as her judges because she is the voice, and they are the creations, of God. This leads us to highlight another aspect of the prophecy.
We have called this chapter a trial-at-law; but it is far more a personal than a legal controversy; of the formally forensic there is very little about it. Some[9] theologies and many preachers have attempted the conviction of the human conscience by the technicalities of a system of law, or by appealing to this or that historical covenant, or by the obligations of an intricate and burdensome morality. This is not Isaiah's way. His generation is here judged by no system of law or ancient covenants, but by a living Person and by His treatment of them—a Person who is a Friend and a Father. It is not Judah and the law that are confronted; it is Judah and Jehovah. There is no contrast between the life of this generation and some glorious estate from which they or their forefathers have fallen; but they are made to hear the voice of a living and present God: I have nourished and brought up children, and they have rebelled against Me. Isaiah begins where Saul of Tarsus began, who, though he afterwards elaborated with wealth of detail the awful indictment of the abstract law against man, had never been able to do so but for that first confronting with the Personal Deity, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou Me? Isaiah's ministry started from the vision of the Lord; and it was no covenant or theory, but the Lord Himself, who remained the prophet's conscience to the end.
We’ve called this chapter a trial-at-law, but it’s much more of a personal than a legal issue; there’s very little of the formal legal about it. Some[9] theologies and many preachers have tried to convict the human conscience through the technicalities of a legal system or by referencing this or that historical covenant, or by the demands of a complicated and heavy morality. That’s not Isaiah’s approach. His generation is judged not by any legal system or ancient covenants, but by a living Person and how He interacts with them—a Person who is a Friend and a Father. It’s not Judah and the law that are facing off; it’s Judah and Jehovah. There’s no contrast between this generation’s life and some glorious state they or their ancestors have fallen from; instead, they hear the voice of a living and present God: I have raised and cared for children, and they have rebelled against Me. Isaiah starts where Saul of Tarsus began, who, although he later elaborated in detail the terrible indictment of the abstract law against humanity, was only able to do so because of that initial confrontation with the Personal Deity, Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me? Isaiah’s ministry began with the vision of the Lord; and it was not a covenant or a theory, but the Lord Himself who remained the prophet's conscience until the very end.
But though the living God is Isaiah's one explanation of conscience, it is God in two aspects, the moral effects of which are opposite, yet complementary. In conscience men are defective by forgetting either the sublime or the practical, but Isaiah's strength is to do justice to both. With him God is first the infinitely High, and then equally the infinitely Near. The Lord is exalted in righteousness! yes, and sublimely above the people's vulgar identifications of His will with their own safety and success, but likewise concerned with every detail of their politics and social behaviour,[10] not to be relegated to the Temple, where they were wont to confine Him, but by His prophet descending to their markets and councils, with His own opinion of their policies, interfering in their intrigues, meeting Ahaz at the conduit of the upper pool in the highway of the fuller's field, and fastening eyes of glory on every pin and point of the dress of the daughters of Zion. He is no merely transcendent God. Though He be the High and Holy One, He will discuss each habit of the people, and argue upon its merits every one of their policies. His constant cry to them is Come and let us reason together, and to hear it is to have a conscience. Indeed, Isaiah lays more stress on this intellectual side of the moral sense than on the other, and the frequency with which in this chapter he employs the expressions know, and consider, and reason, is characteristic of all his prophesying. Even the most superficial reader must notice how much this prophet's doctrine of conscience and repentance harmonizes with the metanoia of New Testament preaching.
But even though the living God is Isaiah's only explanation of conscience, He is God in two different ways, whose moral effects are opposite yet complementary. In conscience, people tend to struggle by overlooking either the lofty or the practical, but Isaiah's strength lies in honoring both. For him, God is first the infinitely High, and then equally the infinitely Near. The Lord is exalted in righteousness! Yes, He is far above the people's common interpretations of His will as merely their own safety and success, but He is also deeply concerned with every detail of their politics and social behavior, [10] not to be confined just to the Temple, where they typically limited Him, but by His prophet entering their markets and councils, providing His own views on their policies, intervening in their plots, meeting Ahaz at the conduit of the upper pool on the highway of the fuller's field, and focusing eyes of glory on every detail of the daughters of Zion's attire. He is not just a transcendent God. Even though He is the High and Holy One, He discusses every aspect of the people's habits and evaluates each of their policies. His constant call to them is Come and let us reason together, and to heed this call is to gain a conscience. Indeed, Isaiah emphasizes this intellectual aspect of moral understanding more than the other, and the frequency with which he uses terms like know, consider, and reason in this chapter reflects the essence of all his prophecies. Even the most casual reader must notice how this prophet's teachings on conscience and repentance align with the metanoia of New Testament preaching.
This doctrine, that God has an interest in every detail of practical life and will argue it out with men, led Isaiah to a revelation of God quite peculiar to himself. For the Psalmist it is enough that his soul come to God, the living God. It is enough for other prophets to awe the hearts of their generations by revealing the Holy One; but Isaiah, with his intensely practical genius, and sorely tried by the stupid inconsistency of his people, bends himself to make them understand that God is at least a reasonable Being. Do not, his constant cry is, and he puts it sometimes in almost as many words—do not act as if there were a Fool on the throne of the universe, which you virtually do when you take these meaningless[11] forms of worship as your only intercourse with Him, and beside them practise your rank iniquities, as if He did not see nor care. We need not here do more than mention the passages in which, sometimes by a word, Isaiah stings and startles self-conscious politicians and sinners beetle-blind in sin, with the sense that God Himself takes an interest in their deeds and has His own working-plans for their life. On the land question in Judah (v. 9): In mine ears, saith the Lord of hosts. When the people were paralyzed by calamity, as if it had no meaning or term (xxviii. 29): This also cometh forth from the Lord of hosts, which is wonderful in counsel and excellent in effectual working. Again, when they were panic-stricken, and madly sought by foolish ways their own salvation (xxx. 18): For the Lord is a God of judgement—i.e., of principle, method, law, with His own way and time for doing things—blessed are all they that wait for Him. And again, when politicians were carried away by the cleverness and success of their own schemes (xxxi. 2): Yet He also is wise, or clever. It was only a personal application of this Divine attribute when Isaiah heard the word of the Lord give him the minutest directions for his own practice—as, for instance, at what exact point he was to meet Ahaz (vii. 3); or that he was to take a board and write upon it in the vulgar character (viii. 1); or that he was to strip frock and sandals, and walk without them for three years (xx). Where common men feel conscience only as something vague and inarticulate, a flavour, a sting, a foreboding, the obligation of work, the constraint of affection, Isaiah heard the word of the Lord, clear and decisive on matters of policy, and definite even to the details of method and style.
This idea that God is involved in every aspect of daily life and will engage with people led Isaiah to a unique understanding of God. For the Psalmist, it's enough for his soul to come to God, the living God. Other prophets can frighten their people by revealing the Holy One, but Isaiah, with his practical mindset and frustrations over the foolish inconsistencies of his people, strives to show them that God is at least a reasonable Being. His constant message—sometimes put almost exactly this way—urges them not to behave as if a Fool is ruling the universe, which is what they effectively do when they rely solely on meaningless forms of worship and persist in their blatant wickedness, acting as if God doesn’t see or care. We only need to mention the passages where Isaiah, sometimes with just a word, shocks self-aware politicians and sinners blind to their own sin, by conveying that God takes an interest in their actions and has His own plans for their lives. Regarding land issues in Judah (v. 9): In my ears, says the Lord of hosts. When the people felt hopeless due to disaster, as if it were pointless or endless (xxviii. 29): This also comes from the Lord of hosts, who is wonderful in counsel and excellent in effectiveness. Again, when they panicked and desperately sought salvation through foolish means (xxx. 18): For the Lord is a God of judgment—meaning of principle, method, law, with His own approach and timing—blessed are all who wait for Him. And once more, when politicians were swept up in their own cleverness and success (xxx. 2): Yet He also is wise. It was merely a personal application of this Divine trait when Isaiah heard the Lord’s word giving him specific directions for his own actions—like exactly where to meet Ahaz (vii. 3); or to take a board and write on it in common script (viii. 1); or to remove his robe and sandals and walk without them for three years (xx). While average people perceive conscience as something vague and indistinct, a feeling, a sting, or a sense of obligation, Isaiah received the word of the Lord, clear and decisive on issues of policy, even down to the precise details of approach and manner.
[12]Isaiah's conscience, then, was perfect, because it was two-fold: God is holy; God is practical. If there be the glory, the purity as of fire, of His Presence to overawe, there is His unceasing inspection of us, there is His interest in the smallest details of our life, there are His fixed laws, from regard for all of which no amount of religious sensibility may relieve us. Neither of these halves of conscience can endure by itself. If we forget the first we may be prudent and for a time clever, but will also grow self-righteous, and in time self-righteousness means stupidity too. If we forget the second we may be very devotional, but cannot escape becoming blindly and inconsistently immoral. Hypocrisy is the result either way, whether we forget how high God is or whether we forget how near.
[12]Isaiah's conscience was flawless because it had two aspects: God is holy; God is practical. If there’s the glory and purity of His Presence that awes us, there’s also His constant observation of us, His interest in the smallest details of our lives, and His unchanging laws, which no level of religious sensitivity can exempt us from. Neither of these aspects of conscience can stand alone. If we neglect the first, we might be cautious and temporarily clever, but we’ll also become self-righteous, and ultimately self-righteousness leads to foolishness too. If we disregard the second, we may be deeply devotional, but we won’t avoid becoming blind and inconsistently immoral. Hypocrisy results either way, whether we forget how great God is or how close He is.
To these two great articles of conscience, however—God is high and God is near—the Bible adds a greater third, God is Love. This is the uniqueness and glory of the Bible's interpretation of conscience. Other writings may equal it in enforcing the sovereignty and detailing the minutely practical bearings of conscience: the Bible alone tells man how much of conscience is nothing but God's love. It is a doctrine as plainly laid down as the doctrine about chastisement, though not half so much recognised—Whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth. What is true of the material pains and penalties of life is equally true of the inward convictions, frets, threats and fears, which will not leave stupid man alone. To men with their obscure sense of shame, and restlessness, and servitude to sin the Bible plainly says, "You are able to sin because you have turned your back to the love of God; you are unhappy because you do not take that love to your heart; the bitterness of your remorse is that it is love against which you are[13] ungrateful." Conscience is not the Lord's persecution, but His jealous pleading, and not the fierceness of His anger, but the reproach of His love. This is the Bible's doctrine throughout, and it is not absent from the chapter we are considering. Love gets the first word even in the indictment of this austere assize: I have nourished and brought up children, and they have rebelled against Me. Conscience is already a Father's voice: the recollection, as it is in the parable of the prodigal, of a Father's mercy; the reproach, as it is with Christ's lamentation over Jerusalem, of outraged love. We shall find not a few passages in Isaiah, which prove that he was in harmony with all revelation upon this point, that conscience is the reproach of the love of God.
To these two important beliefs about conscience—God is high and God is near—the Bible adds a crucial third: God is Love. This highlights the uniqueness and beauty of the Bible's view on conscience. Other texts may also emphasize the authority of conscience and provide detailed practical guidance, but the Bible uniquely explains how much of conscience is simply the expression of God's love. This is clearly stated just like the teaching about discipline, even if it's not recognized as often—Whom the Lord loves, He disciplines. What applies to the physical pains and penalties in life also applies to the inner feelings, anxieties, warnings, and fears that stubborn humanity can't escape. The Bible clearly tells those burdened with shame, restlessness, and enslavement to sin, "You are able to sin because you have turned away from God's love; you are unhappy because you won't accept that love; the pain of your guilt stems from your ingratitude toward love." Conscience is not God’s punishment but rather His heartfelt appeal, and it reflects not the intensity of His anger but the sorrow of His love. This message is consistent throughout the Bible and is present in the chapter we are examining. Love speaks first even in the serious accusations: I have nurtured and raised children, and they have rebelled against Me. Conscience already represents a Father’s voice, echoing the mercy of a Father—as seen in the parable of the prodigal son—and the grief of Christ over Jerusalem due to rejected love. We will find several passages in Isaiah that show he aligns with all revelation on this matter that conscience is the expression of God's love.
But when that understanding of conscience breaks out in a sinner's heart forgiveness cannot be far away. Certainly penitence is at hand. And therefore, because of all books the Bible is the only one which interprets conscience as the love of God, so is it the only one that can combine His pardon with His reproach, and as Isaiah now does in a single verse, proclaim His free forgiveness as the conclusion of His bitter quarrel. Come, let us bring our reasoning to a close, saith the Lord. Though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. Our version, Come, and let us reason together, gives no meaning here. So plain an offer of pardon is not reasoning together; it is bringing reasoning to an end; it is the settlement of a dispute that has been in progress. Therefore we translate, with Mr. Cheyne, Let us bring our reasoning to an end. And how pardon can be the end and logical conclusion of conscience is clear to us, who have seen how much of conscience is love,[14] and that the Lord's controversy is the reproach of His Father's heart, and His jealousy to make His own consider all His way of mercy towards them.
But when a sinner's conscience becomes clear, forgiveness is close behind. Repentance is definitely at hand. That’s why, of all books, the Bible is the only one that shows conscience as the love of God; it's also the only one that can link His forgiveness with His rebuke, just like Isaiah does in one verse by declaring His free forgiveness as the resolution of a difficult conflict. Come, let us bring our reasoning to a close, says the Lord. Though your sins are like scarlet, they will be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they will be like wool. Our version, Come, and let us reason together, doesn’t convey the real meaning here. Such a clear offer of forgiveness isn’t about reasoning together; it’s about ending the debate; it’s the resolution of an ongoing dispute. So we translate it, as Mr. Cheyne does, Let us bring our reasoning to an end. It’s clear to us how forgiveness can be the conclusion of a conscience that is filled with love, [14] and that the Lord's conflict is the pain of His Father's heart and His desire to show His own the depth of His mercy towards them.
But the prophet does not leave conscience alone with its personal and inward results. He rouses it to its social applications. The sins with which the Jews are charged in this charge of the Lord are public sins. The whole people is indicted, but it is the judges, princes and counsellors who are denounced. Judah's disasters, which she seeks to meet by worship, are due to civic faults, bribery, corruption of justice, indifference to the rights of the poor and the friendless. Conscience with Isaiah is not what it is with so much of the religion of to-day, a cul de sac, into which the Lord chases a man and shuts him up to Himself, but it is a thoroughfare by which the Lord drives the man out upon the world and its manifold need of him. There is little dissection and less study of individual character with Isaiah. He has no time for it. Life is too much about him, and his God too much interested in life. What may be called the more personal sins—drunkenness, vanity of dress, thoughtlessness, want of faith in God and patience to wait for Him—are to Isaiah more social than individual symptoms, and it is for their public and political effects that he mentions them. Forgiveness is no end in itself, but the opportunity of social service; not a sanctuary in which Isaiah leaves men to sing its praises or form doctrines of it, but a gateway through which he leads God's people upon the world with the cry that rises from him here: Seek justice, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow.
But the prophet doesn’t leave conscience alone with its personal and internal consequences. He pushes it toward its social implications. The sins the Jews are accused of in this message from the Lord are public sins. The entire community is accused, but it’s the judges, leaders, and advisors who are specifically criticized. Judah’s troubles, which she tries to address through worship, are due to civic wrongs, bribery, corruption in justice, and apathy toward the rights of the poor and vulnerable. For Isaiah, conscience is not just a cul de sac where the Lord isolates a person, but rather a path that leads them out into the world and its many needs. Isaiah does little analysis or exploration of individual character. He has no time for that. Life is too pressing, and his God is too concerned with life. What might be considered personal sins—like drunkenness, vanity in appearance, carelessness, lack of faith in God, and impatience—are seen by Isaiah as more societal than individual issues, and he mentions them for their public and political impacts. Forgiveness isn’t an end in itself but a chance for social service; it’s not a refuge where Isaiah leaves people to praise it or create doctrines about it, but a gateway through which he guides God’s people into the world with the rallying cry that comes from him here: Seek justice, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow.
Before we pass from this form in which Isaiah figures religion we must deal with a suggestion it raises. No modern mind can come into this ancient[15] court of the Lord's controversy without taking advantage of its open forms to put a question regarding the rights of man there. That God should descend to argue with men, what licence does this give to men? If religion be reasonable controversy of this kind, what is the place of doubt in it? Is not doubt man's side of the argument? Has he not also questions to put—the Almighty from his side to arraign? For God has Himself here put man on a level with Him, saying, Come, and let us reason together.
Before we move on from this depiction of religion in Isaiah, we need to address a question it raises. No modern thinker can engage with this ancient[15] court of the Lord's debate without taking the opportunity to ask about human rights. If God chooses to engage in dialogue with humans, what permission does that grant humanity? If religion is a reasonable debate of this nature, what role does doubt play in it? Isn't doubt humanity's part in the discussion? Doesn't humanity also have questions to ask—putting the Almighty on trial from their perspective? After all, God has placed mankind on the same level, saying, Come, and let us reason together.
A temper of this kind, though not strange to the Old Testament, lies beyond the horizon of Isaiah. The only challenge of the Almighty which in any of his prophecies he reports as rising from his own countrymen is the bravado of certain drunkards (chaps. v. and xxviii.). Here and elsewhere it is the very opposite temper from honest doubt which he indicts—the temper that does not know, that does not consider. Ritualism and sensualism are to Isaiah equally false, because equally unthinking. The formalist and the fleshly he classes together, because of their stupidity. What does it matter whether a man's conscience and intellect be stifled in his own fat or under the clothes with which he dresses himself? They are stifled, and that is the main thing. To the formalist Isaiah says, Israel doth not know, my people doth not consider; to the fleshly (chap. v.), My people are gone into captivity for want of knowledge. But knowing and considering are just that of which doubt, in its modern sense, is the abundance, and not the defect. The mobility of mind, the curiosity, the moral sensitiveness, the hunger that is not satisfied with the chaff of formal and unreal answers, the spirit to find out truth for one's self, wrestling with God—this is the very temper Isaiah would have welcomed in a[16] people whose sluggishness of reason was as justly blamed by him as the grossness of their moral sense. And if revelation be of the form in which Isaiah so prominently sets it, and the whole Bible bears him out in this—if revelation be this argumentative and reasonable process, then human doubt has its part in revelation. It is, indeed, man's side of the argument, and as history shows, has often helped to the elucidation of the points at issue.
A temperament like this, while not uncommon in the Old Testament, goes beyond what Isaiah encounters. The only challenge from God that he reports from his own people is the arrogance of some drunkards (chaps. v. and xxviii.). Here and elsewhere, it’s the complete opposite of honest doubt that he criticizes—the mindset that does not know, that does not consider. Isaiah sees both ritualism and sensualism as equally false because they are both unthinking. He groups the formalist and the sensual together because of their ignorance. What difference does it make if a man's conscience and intellect are stifled by their own excess or by the clothes they wear? They are stifled, and that’s what matters. To the formalist, Isaiah says, Israel does not know, my people do not consider; to the sensual (chap. v.), My people are taken captive for lack of knowledge. But knowing and considering are precisely what modern doubt is all about; it’s not a defect but abundant. A vibrant mind, curiosity, moral awareness, a dissatisfaction with superficial and insincere answers, a desire to seek truth for oneself, and a willingness to wrestle with God—this is the very attitude Isaiah would have welcomed in a[16] people whose sluggish reasoning was justly criticized by him alongside their moral dullness. And if revelation is presented in the way Isaiah prominently demonstrates, and the entire Bible supports this—if revelation involves this argumentative and reasonable process, then human doubt plays a role in revelation. It is, in fact, mankind’s side of the argument and, as history shows, has often contributed to clarifying the issues at hand.
Merely intellectual scepticism, however, is not within Isaiah's horizon. He would never have employed (nor would any other prophet) our modern habits of doubt, except as he employs these intellectual terms, to know and to consider—viz., as instruments of moral search and conviction. Had he lived now he would have been found among those few great prophets who use the resources of the human intellect to expose the moral state of humanity; who, like Shakespeare and Hugo, turn man's detective and reflective processes upon his own conduct; who make himself stand at the bar of his conscience. And truly to have doubt of everything in heaven and earth, and never to doubt one's self, is to be guilty of as stiff and stupid a piece of self-righteousness as the religious formalists whom Isaiah exposes. But the moral of the chapter is plainly what we have shown it to be, that a man cannot stifle doubt and debate about his own heart or treatment of God; whatever else he thinks about and judges, he cannot help judging himself.
Merely intellectual skepticism, however, is not in Isaiah's view. He would never have used (nor would any other prophet) our modern ways of doubting, except as he uses these intellectual terms, to know and to consider—namely, as tools for moral exploration and conviction. If he were alive today, he would be among those few great prophets who use the capabilities of human intellect to reveal the moral condition of humanity; who, like Shakespeare and Hugo, direct people's analytical and reflective processes onto their own actions; who make individuals stand before their conscience. And truly, to doubt everything in heaven and earth while never doubting oneself is to show as stiff and foolish a form of self-righteousness as the religious formalists that Isaiah criticizes. But the main point of the chapter is clearly what we have indicated: that a person cannot suppress doubts and discussions about their own heart or relationship with God; whatever else they think about and judge, they cannot help but judge themselves.
Note on the Place of Nature in the Argument of the Lord.—The office which the Bible assigns to Nature in the controversy of God with man is fourfold—Assessor, Witness, Man's Fellow-Convict, and Doomster or Executioner. Taking these backward:—1. Scripture[17] frequently exhibits Nature as the doomster of the Lord. Nature has a terrible power of flashing back from her vaster surfaces the guilty impressions of man's heart; at the last day her thunders shall peal the doom of the wicked, and her fire devour them. In those prophecies of the book of Isaiah which relate to his own time this use is not made of Nature, unless it be in his very earliest prophecy in chap. ii., and in his references to the earthquake (v. 25). To Isaiah the sentences and scourges of God are political and historical, the threats and arms of Assyria. He employs the violences of Nature only as metaphors for Assyrian rage and force. But he often promises fertility as the effect of the Lord's pardon, and when the prophets are writing about Nature, it is difficult to say whether they are to be understood literally or poetically. But, at any rate, there is much larger use made of physical catastrophes and convulsions in those other prophecies which do not relate to Isaiah's own time, and are now generally thought not to be his. Compare chaps. xiii. and xiv. 2. The representation of the earth as the fellow-convict of guilty man, sharing his curse, is very vivid in Isaiah xxiv.-xxvii. In the prophecies relating to his own time Isaiah, of course, identifies the troubles that afflict the land with the sin of the people, of Judah. But these are due to political causes—viz., the Assyrian invasion. 3. In the Lord's court of judgement the prophets sometimes employ Nature as a witness against man, as, for instance, the prophet Micah (vi. 1, ff). Nature is full of associations; the enduring mountains have memories from old, they have been constant witnesses of the dealing of God with His people. 4. Or lastly, Nature may be used as the great assessor of the conscience, sitting to expound the principles on which God governs life.[18] This is Isaiah's favourite use of Nature. He employs her to corroborate his statement of the Divine law and illustrate the ways of God to men, as in the end of chap. xxviii., and no doubt in the opening verse of this chapter.
Note on the Role of Nature in the Argument of the Lord.—The Bible assigns four roles to Nature in the dispute between God and man—Adviser, Witness, Man's Fellow-Convict, and Judge or Executioner. Looking at these in reverse order: 1. Scripture[17] often portrays Nature as the judge of the Lord. Nature has a powerful ability to reflect the guilty thoughts of man's heart; on the last day, her thunders will announce the fate of the wicked, and her fire will consume them. In the prophecies of Isaiah concerning his own time, this role of Nature is not evident, except perhaps in his very early prophecy in chap. ii., and in his references to the earthquake (v. 25). For Isaiah, God's sentences and punishments are political and historical, relating to the threats and forces of Assyria. He uses the forces of Nature only as symbols of Assyrian power and rage. However, he often promises fertility as a result of the Lord's forgiveness, and when the prophets write about Nature, it can be hard to tell whether they're speaking literally or poetically. Nevertheless, there is a much broader use of natural disasters and upheavals in other prophecies that do not pertain to Isaiah's time and are generally believed not to be his. Compare chaps. xiii. and xiv. 2. The depiction of the earth as the fellow-convict of guilty humanity, sharing in its curse, is quite vivid in Isaiah xxiv.-xxvii. In the prophecies about his own time, Isaiah clearly connects the troubles affecting the land with the sins of the people of Judah. However, these issues stem from political reasons—specifically, the Assyrian invasion. 3. In the Lord's court of judgment, the prophets sometimes use Nature as a witness against man, as seen with the prophet Micah (vi. 1, ff). Nature is full of associations; the enduring mountains have ancient memories, having consistently witnessed God's dealings with His people. 4. Finally, Nature may also serve as the great adviser of conscience, helping to explain the principles by which God governs life.[18] This is Isaiah's preferred role for Nature. He uses it to support his statements about Divine law and to illustrate how God interacts with humanity, as seen at the end of chap. xxviii., and undoubtedly in the opening verse of this chapter.
CHAPTER II.
THE THREE JERUSALEMS.
Isaiah ii.-iv. (740-735 B.C.).
Isaiah II-IV. (740-735 B.C.).
After the general introduction, in chap. i., to the prophecies of Isaiah, there comes another portion of the book, of greater length, but nearly as distinct as the first. It covers four chapters, the second to the sixth, all of them dating from the same earliest period of Isaiah's ministry, before 735 B.C. They deal with exactly the same subjects, but they differ greatly in form. One section (chaps. ii.-iv.) consists of a number of short utterances—evidently not all spoken at the same time, for they conflict with one another—a series of consecutive prophecies, that probably represent the stages of conviction through which Isaiah passed in his prophetic apprenticeship; a second section (chap. v.) is a careful and artistic restatement, in parable and oration, of the truths he has thus attained; while a third section (chap. vi.) is narrative, probably written subsequently to the first two, but describing an inspiration and official call, which must have preceded them both. The more one examines chaps. ii.-vi., and finds that they but express the same truths in different forms, the more one is confirmed in some such view of them as this, which, it is believed, the following exposition will justify. Chaps. v. and vi.[20] are twin appendices to the long summary in ii.-iv.: chap. v. a public vindication and enforcement of the results of that summary, chap. vi. a private vindication to the prophet's heart of the very same truths, by a return to the secret moment of their original inspiration. We may assign 735 B.C., just before or just after the accession of Ahaz, as the date of the latest of these prophecies. The following is their historical setting.
After the general introduction in chapter I about the prophecies of Isaiah, there's another section of the book that's longer but almost as clear as the first. It spans four chapters, from the second to the sixth, all originating from the same early period of Isaiah's ministry, before 735 B.C.E.. These chapters address the same topics but are presented in very different ways. One part (chapters II-IV) includes several short statements—clearly not all delivered at once, since they contradict each other—a series of consecutive prophecies that likely reflect the stages of understanding Isaiah went through during his prophetic training. The second part (chapter V) is a careful and creative rephrasing, using parables and speeches, of the truths he has learned; while the third part (chapter VI) is a narrative, probably written after the first two, but describing an inspiration and official call that must have come before them. The more you examine chapters II-VI and note that they express the same truths in different forms, the more you feel validated in this perspective, which the subsequent explanation will support. Chapters V and VI[20] serve as twin appendices to the detailed summary in chapters II-IV: chapter V acts as a public affirmation and enforcement of that summary, while chapter VI serves as a personal affirmation to the prophet's heart of the same truths, returning to the private moment of their original inspiration. We can place the date of the latest of these prophecies around 735 B.C., just before or just after Ahaz became king. Here’s the historical context for them.
For more than half a century the kingdom of Judah, under two powerful and righteous monarchs, had enjoyed the greatest prosperity. Uzziah strengthened the borders, extended the supremacy and vastly increased the resources of his little State, which, it is well to remember, was in its own size not larger than three average Scottish counties. He won back for Judah the port of Elath on the Red Sea, built a navy, and restored the commerce with the far East, which Solomon began. He overcame, in battle or by the mere terror of his name, the neighbouring nations—the Philistines that dwelt in cities, and the wandering tribes of desert Arabs. The Ammonites brought him gifts. With the wealth, which the East by tribute or by commerce poured into his little principality, Uzziah fortified his borders and his capital, undertook large works of husbandry and irrigation, organized a powerful standing army, and supplied it with a siege artillery capable of slinging arrows and stones. His name spread far abroad, for he was marvellously helped till he was strong. His son Jotham (740-735 B.C.) continued his father's policy with nearly all his father's success. He built cities and castles, quelled a rebellion among his tributaries, and caused their riches to flow faster still into Jerusalem. But while Jotham bequeathed to his[21] country a sure defence and great wealth, and to his people a strong spirit and prestige among the nations, he left another bequest, which robbed these of their value—the son who succeeded him. In 735 Jotham died and Ahaz became king. He was very young, and stepped to the throne from the hareem. He brought to the direction of the government the petulant will of a spoiled child, the mind of an intriguing and superstitious woman. It was when the national policy felt the paralysis consequent on these that Isaiah published at least the later part of the prophecies now marked off as chaps. ii.-iv. of his book. My people, he cries—my people! children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.
For over fifty years, the kingdom of Judah thrived under two strong and righteous kings. Uzziah fortified the borders, expanded its influence, and significantly boosted the resources of his small state, which was about the size of three average Scottish counties. He regained the port of Elath on the Red Sea, established a navy, and revived trade with the Far East that Solomon had started. He defeated neighboring nations—the Philistines who lived in cities and the nomadic desert Arabs—either in battle or by the sheer terror of his name. The Ammonites brought him gifts. With the wealth flowing into his small principality from tribute and trade, Uzziah strengthened his borders and capital, initiated large agricultural and irrigation projects, set up a powerful standing army, and equipped it with siege artillery for launching arrows and stones. His name spread far and wide, for he was marvelously helped until he grew strong. His son Jotham (740-735 B.C.) continued his father's policies with almost as much success. He built cities and fortresses, suppressed a rebellion among his tributaries, and made their wealth flow even faster into Jerusalem. However, while Jotham left his country a solid defense and great wealth, and his people a strong spirit and respect among the nations, he also left behind a legacy that diminished their value—the son who succeeded him. In 735, Jotham died, and Ahaz became king. He was very young, ascending the throne directly from the hareem. He approached governance with the petulant will of a spoiled child and the mind of a scheming, superstitious woman. It was during this paralysis of national policy that Isaiah began to publish the later parts of the prophecies now identified as chaps. ii.-iv. of his book. My people, he cries—my people! Children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, those who lead you cause you to stray and ruin the paths you should follow.
Isaiah had been born into the flourishing nation while Uzziah was king. The great events of that monarch's reign were his education, the still grander hopes they prompted the passion of his virgin fancy. He must have absorbed as the very temper of his youth this national consciousness which swelled so proudly in Judah under Uzziah. But the accession of such a king as Ahaz, while it was sure to let loose the passions and follies fostered by a period of rapid increase in luxury, could not fail to afford to Judah's enemies the long-deferred opportunity of attacking her. It was an hour both of the manifestation of sin and of the judgement of sin—an hour in which, while the majesty of Judah, sustained through two great reigns, was about to disappear in the follies of a third, the majesty of Judah's God should become more conspicuous than ever. Of this Isaiah had been privately conscious, as we shall see, for five years. In the year that king[22] Uzziah died (740), the young Jew saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up. Startled into prophetic consciousness by the awful contrast between an earthly majesty that had so long fascinated men, but now sank into a leper's grave, and the heavenly, which rose sovereign and everlasting above it, Isaiah had gone on to receive conviction of his people's sin and certain punishment. With the accession of Ahaz, five years later, his own political experience was so far developed as to permit of his expressing in their exact historical effects the awful principles of which he had received foreboding when Uzziah died. What we find in chaps. ii.-iv. is a record of the struggle of his mind towards this expression; it is the summary, as we have already said, of Isaiah's apprenticeship.
Isaiah was born in a thriving nation during Uzziah's reign. The significant events of that king’s rule shaped his education and sparked even greater aspirations in his youthful imagination. He must have absorbed the strong sense of national identity that proudly swelled in Judah under Uzziah. However, the rise of a king like Ahaz was bound to unleash the passions and excesses that came with a time of rapid luxury, while simultaneously giving Judah's enemies a long-awaited chance to strike. It was a time that showcased both sin and its consequences—when the glory of Judah, upheld through two great reigns, was about to fade due to the foolishness of a third, the greatness of Judah’s God would become clearer than ever. Isaiah had been quietly aware of this for five years. In the year that king[22] Uzziah died (740), the young prophet saw the Lord sitting on a throne, high and lifted up. Shocked into prophetic awareness by the stark contrast between an earthly power that had mesmerized people but was now fading into a leper's grave and the heavenly sovereignty that stood unchanging above it, Isaiah came to realize the sins of his people and the inevitable punishment that awaited them. By the time Ahaz came to power five years later, his political understanding had grown enough to articulate the disastrous implications of the terrible truths he sensed when Uzziah passed. What we find in chapters ii.-iv. is a record of the internal struggle he faced in formulating this understanding; it serves as a summary of Isaiah’s period of learning.
The word that Isaiah, the son of Amoz, saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem. We do not know anything of Isaiah's family or of the details of his upbringing. He was a member of some family of Jerusalem, and in intimate relations with the Court. It has been believed that he was of royal blood, but it matters little whether this be true or not. A spirit so wise and masterful as his did not need social rank to fit it for that intimacy with princes which has doubtless suggested the legend of his royal descent. What does matter is Isaiah's citizenship in Jerusalem, for this colours all his prophecy. More than Athens to Demosthenes, Rome to Juvenal, Florence to Dante, is Jerusalem to Isaiah. She is his immediate and ultimate regard, the centre and return of all his thoughts, the hinge of the history of his time, the one thing worth preserving amidst its disasters, the summit of those brilliant hopes with which he fills the future. He has traced for us the main features of her position and some of the lines of her construction, many[23] of the great figures of her streets, the fashions of her women, the arrival of embassies, the effect of rumours. He has painted her aspect in triumph, in siege, in famine and in earthquake; war filling her valleys with chariots, and again nature rolling tides of fruitfulness up to her gates; her moods of worship and panic and profligacy—till we see them all as clearly as the shadow following the sunshine and the breeze across the cornfields of our own summers.
The vision that Isaiah, the son of Amoz, had about Judah and Jerusalem. We don’t know much about Isaiah’s family or his upbringing. He was part of a family in Jerusalem and had close ties to the Court. It's been thought that he might have been of royal blood, but it doesn’t really matter if that’s true or not. A mind as wise and commanding as his didn’t need a high social status to have that closeness with powerful people, which probably led to the story of his royal lineage. What’s important is Isaiah’s citizenship in Jerusalem, as it shapes all his prophecies. More than Athens to Demosthenes, Rome to Juvenal, Florence to Dante, Jerusalem is everything to Isaiah. It’s his primary focus and ultimate concern, the center of all his thoughts, the pivotal point in the history of his time, the one thing worth saving amid its calamities, the peak of the bright hopes he has for the future. He has outlined for us the main aspects of her situation and some of her structures, many[23] of the significant figures in her streets, the styles of her women, the arrival of diplomats, and the impact of rumors. He has depicted her in moments of triumph, siege, famine, and earthquakes; with war filling her valleys with chariots and nature bringing waves of abundance to her gates; through her phases of worship, panic, and indulgence—until we can see them all as clearly as the shadows following the sunshine and the breeze over our summer fields.
If he takes wider observation of mankind, Jerusalem is his watch-tower. It is for her defence he battles through fifty years of statesmanship, and all his prophecy may be said to travail in anguish for her new birth. He was never away from her walls, but not even the psalms of the captives by the rivers of Babylon, with the desire of exile upon them, exhibit more beauty and pathos than the lamentations which Isaiah poured upon Jerusalem's sufferings or the visions in which he described her future solemnity and peace.
If he looks more broadly at humanity, Jerusalem is his lookout point. He fights through fifty years of politics to defend her, and all his predictions can be seen as struggling for her rebirth. He was always close to her walls, but not even the psalms of the captives by the rivers of Babylon, filled with longing for home, show more beauty and emotion than the cries Isaiah wrote about Jerusalem's pain or the visions where he described her future dignity and tranquility.
It is not with surprise, therefore, that we find the first prophecies of Isaiah directed upon his mother city: The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem. There is little about Judah in these chapters: the country forms but a fringe to the capital.
It’s no surprise that the first prophecies of Isaiah are focused on his home city: The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem. There isn’t much about Judah in these chapters; the country is just a backdrop to the capital.
Before we look into the subject of the prophecy, however, a short digression is necessary on the manner in which it is presented to us. It is not a reasoned composition or argument we have here; it is a vision, it is the word which Isaiah saw. The expression is vague, often abused and in need of defining. Vision is not employed here to express any magical display before the eyes of the prophet of the very words which he was to speak to the people, or any communication to[24] his thoughts by dream or ecstasy. They are higher qualities of "vision" which these chapters unfold. There is, first of all, the power of forming an ideal, of seeing and describing a thing in the fulfilment of all the promise that is in it. But these prophecies are much more remarkable for two other powers of inward vision, to which we give the names of insight and intuition—insight into human character, intuition of Divine principles—clear knowledge of what man is and how God will act—a keen discrimination of the present state of affairs in Judah, and unreasoned conviction of moral truth and the Divine will. The original meaning of the Hebrew word saw, which is used in the title to this series, is to cleave, or split; then to see into, to see through, to get down beneath the surface of things and discover their real nature. And what characterizes the bulk of these visions is penetrativeness, the keenness of a man who will not be deceived by an outward show that he delights to hold up to our scorn, but who has a conscience for the inner worth of things and for their future consequences. To lay stress on the moral meaning of the prophet's vision is not to grudge, but to emphasize its inspiration by God. Of that inspiration Isaiah was himself assured. It was God's Spirit that enabled him to see thus keenly; for he saw things keenly, not only as men count moral keenness, but as God Himself sees them, in their value in His sight and in their attractiveness for His love and pity. In this prophecy there occurs a striking expression—the eyes of the glory of God. It was the vision of the Almighty Searcher and Judge, burning through man's pretence, with which the prophet felt himself endowed. This then was the second element in his vision—to penetrate men's hearts as God Himself[25] penetrated them, and constantly, without squint or blur, to see right from wrong in their eternal difference. And the third element is the intuition of God's will, the perception of what line of action He will take. This last, of course, forms the distinct prerogative of Hebrew prophecy, that power of vision which is its climax; the moral situation being clear, to see then how God will act upon it.
Before we dive into the topic of the prophecy, it's important to briefly discuss how it is presented to us. What we have here isn't a logical composition or an argument; it’s a vision, the word that Isaiah saw. This term is often vague and misused, so it needs clarification. Vision, in this context, doesn’t refer to a magical display before the prophet’s eyes of the very words he was meant to deliver to the people, nor does it imply any thought communicated to him through dreams or ecstasy. These chapters reveal higher qualities of "vision." First, there is the ability to form an ideal, to see and describe something in the fullness of its potential. However, these prophecies stand out more for two other aspects of inward vision that we refer to as insight and intuition—insight into human character and intuition about Divine principles—clear knowledge of what a person is and how God will act—a sharp understanding of the current situation in Judah and an instinctual grasp of moral truth and God’s will. The original meaning of the Hebrew word saw, used in the title of this series, is to cleave or split; then it implies seeing into or through something, getting beneath the surface to uncover its true nature. What defines most of these visions is their penetrativeness, the sharp perception of a person who cannot be fooled by outward appearances that he enjoys showing us to criticize, yet who values the inner worth of things and their future implications. Emphasizing the moral significance of the prophet's vision doesn't diminish but instead highlights its divine inspiration. Isaiah was convinced of that inspiration. It was God's Spirit that allowed him to see so clearly; he perceived things sharply, not just by human standards of moral clarity, but as God Himself views them, valuing them in His own sight and recognizing their appeal for His love and compassion. In this prophecy, there’s a memorable phrase—the eyes of the glory of God. It reflects the vision of the Almighty Searcher and Judge, burning through human pretense, which the prophet believed he possessed. This then brings us to the second element of his vision—penetrating human hearts as God does, consistently seeing right from wrong in their eternal distinction without any distortion. The third element is the intuition of God's will, the ability to perceive the course of action He will follow. This last aspect clearly represents the unique characteristic of Hebrew prophecy—the capacity for vision that culminates in recognizing how God will respond to the moral landscape presented.
Under these three powers of vision Jerusalem, the prophet's city, is presented to us—Jerusalem in three lights, really three Jerusalems. First, there is flashed out (chap. ii. 2-5) a vision of the ideal city, Jerusalem idealized and glorified. Then comes (ii. 6-iv. 1) a very realistic picture, a picture of the actual Jerusalem. And lastly at the close of the prophecy (iv. 2-6) we have a vision of Jerusalem as she shall be after God has taken her in hand—very different indeed from the ideal with which the prophet began. Here are three successive motives or phases of prophecy, which, as we have said, in all probability summarize the early ministry of Isaiah, and present him to us first as the idealist or visionary, second as the realist or critic, and third as the prophet proper or revealer of God's actual will.
Under these three perspectives, Jerusalem, the city of the prophet, is shown to us—Jerusalem in three different ways, really three Jerusalems. First, there’s a vision of the ideal city, Jerusalem envisioned and glorified (chap. ii. 2-5). Then comes a very realistic portrayal, a picture of the actual Jerusalem (ii. 6-iv. 1). Finally, at the end of the prophecy (iv. 2-6), we get a vision of Jerusalem as she will be after God has intervened—very different from the ideal the prophet started with. These are three successive themes or phases of prophecy, which likely summarize the early ministry of Isaiah, presenting him to us first as the idealist or visionary, second as the realist or critic, and third as the true prophet or revealer of God's actual will.
I. The Idealist (ii. 1-5).
I. The Idealist (ii. 1-5).
All men who have shown our race how great things are possible have had their inspiration in dreaming of the impossible. Reformers, who at death were content to have lived for the moving forward but one inch of some of their fellow-men, began by believing themselves able to lift the whole world at once. Isaiah was no exception to this human fashion. His first vision was that of a Utopia, and his first belief that his countrymen would immediately realize it. He lifts up[26] to us a very grand picture of a vast commonwealth centred in Jerusalem. Some think he borrowed it from an older prophet; Micah has it also; it may have been the ideal of the age. But, at any rate, if we are not to take verse 5 in scorn, Isaiah accepted this as his own. And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the Lord's house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and exalted above the hills, and all nations shall flow unto it. The prophet's own Jerusalem shall be the light of the world, the school and temple of the earth, the seat of the judgement of the Lord, when He shall reign over the nations, and all mankind shall dwell in peace beneath Him. It is a glorious destiny, and as its light shines from the far-off horizon, the latter days, in which the prophet sees it, what wonder that he is possessed and cries aloud, O house of Jacob, come ye, and let us walk in the light of the Lord! It seems to the young prophet's hopeful heart as if at once that ideal would be realized, as if by his own word he could lift his people to its fulfilment.
All men who have shown our race what great things are possible have been inspired by dreaming of the impossible. Reformers, who at the end of their lives were satisfied to have moved just an inch forward for some of their fellow humans, started by believing they could lift the whole world all at once. Isaiah was no different. His first vision was of a Utopia, and he believed that his fellow countrymen would immediately achieve it. He presents us with a grand image of a vast commonwealth centered in Jerusalem. Some think he took this idea from an earlier prophet; Micah shares it as well; it might have been the ideal of the time. But in any case, if we’re not going to dismiss verse 5, Isaiah accepted this as his own. And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the Lord's house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and exalted above the hills, and all nations shall flow unto it. The prophet's own Jerusalem will be the light of the world, the school and temple of the earth, the seat of the judgment of the Lord, when He reigns over the nations, and all humankind dwells in peace beneath Him. It's a glorious destiny, and as its light shines from the distant horizon, the latter days, in which the prophet sees it, one can’t be surprised that he is overwhelmed and cries out, O house of Jacob, come ye, and let us walk in the light of the Lord! It seems to the hopeful heart of the young prophet that this ideal could be realized at any moment, as if his very words could lift his people to its fulfillment.
But that is impossible, and Isaiah perceives so as soon as he turns from the far-off horizon to the city at his feet, as soon as he leaves to-morrow alone and deals with to-day. The next verses of the chapter—from verse 6 onwards—stand in strong contrast to those which have described Israel's ideal. There Zion is full of the law and Jerusalem of the word of the Lord, the one religion flowing over from this centre upon the world. Here into the actual Jerusalem they have brought all sorts of foreign worship and heathen prophets; they are replenished from the East, and are soothsayers like the Philistines, and strike hands with the children of strangers. There all nations come to worship at[27] Jerusalem; here her thought and faith are scattered over the idolatries of all nations. The ideal Jerusalem is full of spiritual blessings, the actual of the spoils of trade. There the swords are beat into ploughshares and the spears into pruning-hooks; here are vast and novel armaments, horses and chariots. There the Lord alone is worshipped; here the city is crowded with idols. The real Jerusalem could not possibly be more different from the ideal, nor its inhabitants as they are from what their prophet had confidently called on them to be.
But that’s impossible, and Isaiah realizes this as soon as he shifts his focus from the distant horizon to the city at his feet, as soon as he sets aside tomorrow and confronts today. The next verses of the chapter—from verse 6 onward—contrast sharply with those that describe Israel's ideal. In that ideal, Zion is filled with the law and Jerusalem with the word of the Lord, with one religion flowing from this center out into the world. Here, in the real Jerusalem, they have brought in all kinds of foreign worship and pagan prophets; they are filled with influences from the East, and are soothsayers like the Philistines, and make agreements with outsiders. There, all nations come to worship at [27] Jerusalem; here, her thoughts and beliefs are scattered across the idolatries of all nations. The ideal Jerusalem brims with spiritual blessings, while the real one is filled with the spoils of trade. There, swords are turned into ploughshares and spears into pruning hooks; here, there are vast and new armaments, horses and chariots. There, the Lord is worshipped alone; here, the city is crowded with idols. The actual Jerusalem couldn’t be more different from the ideal, nor could its inhabitants be further from what their prophet confidently urged them to become.
II. The Realist (ii. 6-iv. 1).
II. The Realist (ii. 6-iv. 1).
Therefore Isaiah's attitude and tone suddenly change. The visionary becomes a realist, the enthusiast a cynic, the seer of the glorious city of God the prophet of God's judgement. The recoil is absolute in style, temper and thought, down to the very figures of speech which he uses. Before, Isaiah had seen, as it were, a lifting process at work, Jerusalem in the top of the mountains, and exalted above the hills. Now he beholds nothing but depression. For the day of the Lord of hosts shall be upon every one that is proud and haughty, upon all that is lifted up, and it shall be brought low, and the Lord alone shall be exalted in that day. Nothing in the great civilization, which he had formerly glorified, is worth preserving. The high towers, fenced walls, ships of Tarshish, treasures and armour must all perish, even the hills lifted by his imagination shall be bowed down, and the Lord alone be exalted in that day. This recoil reaches its extreme in the last verse of the chapter. The prophet, who had believed so much in man as to think possible an immediate commonwealth of nations, believes in man now so little that he does[28] not hold him worth preserving: Cease ye from man, whose breath is in his nostrils; for wherein is he to be accounted of?
Therefore, Isaiah's attitude and tone suddenly shift. The visionary becomes a realist, the enthusiast turns into a cynic, and the one who saw the glorious city of God becomes the prophet of God's judgment. The change is complete in style, mood, and thought, down to the very figures of speech he uses. Before, Isaiah had envisioned, so to speak, a process of elevation, Jerusalem on the top of the mountains, and raised above the hills. Now he sees nothing but despair. For the day of the Lord of hosts will be upon everyone who is proud and arrogant, upon all who are exalted, and they will be brought low, and the Lord alone will be exalted in that day. Nothing in the great civilization he once glorified is worth saving. The tall towers, fortified walls, ships of Tarshish, treasures and armor must all be destroyed; even the hills lifted by his imagination will be humbled, and the Lord alone will be exalted in that day. This shift reaches its peak in the last verse of the chapter. The prophet, who once had so much faith in humanity to envision an immediate global community, now believes in people so little that he does [28] not consider them worth preserving: Stop trusting in man, whose breath is in his nostrils; for what is he really worth?
Attached to this general denunciation are some satiric descriptions, in the third chapter, of the anarchy, to which society in Jerusalem is fast being reduced under its childish and effeminate king. The scorn of these passages is scathing; the eyes of the glory of God burn through every rank, fashion and ornament in the town. King and court are not spared; the elders and princes are rigorously denounced. But by far the most striking effort of the prophet's boldness is his prediction of the overthrow of Jerusalem itself (ver. 8). What it cost Isaiah to utter and the people to hear we can only partly measure. To his own passionate patriotism it must have felt like treason, to the blind optimism of the popular religion it doubtless appeared the rankest heresy—to aver that the holy city, inviolate and almost unthreatened since the day David brought to her the ark of the Lord, and destined by the voice of her prophets, including Isaiah himself, to be established upon the tops of the mountains, was now to fall into ruin. But Isaiah's conscience overcomes his sense of consistency, and he who has just proclaimed the eternal glory of Jerusalem is provoked by his knowledge of her citizens' sins to recall his words and intimate her destruction. It may have been, that Isaiah was partly emboldened to so novel a threat, by his knowledge of the preparations which Syria and Israel were already making for the invasion of Judah. The prospect of Jerusalem, as the centre of a vast empire subject to Jehovah, however natural it was under a successful ruler like Uzziah, became, of course, unreal when every one of Uzziah's and Jotham's tributaries had risen in[29] revolt against their successor, Ahaz. But of these outward movements Isaiah tells us nothing. He is wholly engrossed with Judah's sin. It is his growing acquaintance with the corruption of his fellow-countrymen that has turned his back on the ideal city of his opening ministry, and changed him into a prophet of Jerusalem's ruin. Their tongue and their doings are against the Lord, to provoke the eyes of His glory. Judge, prophet and elder, all the upper ranks and useful guides of the people, must perish. It is a sign of the degradation to which society shall be reduced, when Isaiah with keen sarcasm pictures the despairing people choosing a certain man to be their ruler because he alone has a coat to his back! (iii. 6).
Attached to this general denunciation are some satirical descriptions, in the third chapter, of the chaos that society in Jerusalem is quickly descending into under its childish and effeminate king. The mockery in these passages is harsh; the eyes of the glory of God pierce through every rank, style, and ornament in the town. The king and court are not spared; the elders and princes face strict condemnation. But the most striking act of the prophet's boldness is his prediction of the downfall of Jerusalem itself (ver. 8). The weight of what it cost Isaiah to say this and the people to hear it is hard to gauge. To his own passionate love for his country, it must have felt like betrayal, and to the blind optimism of the popular religion, it likely seemed like the worst heresy—to claim that the holy city, untouched and almost safe since the day David brought the ark of the Lord there, and destined by the words of her prophets, including Isaiah himself, to be set on the mountaintops, was now going to fall apart. But Isaiah’s conscience wins out over his desire to maintain consistency, and he, who has just proclaimed the eternal glory of Jerusalem, is pushed by his knowledge of the sins of her citizens to take back his words and hint at her destruction. It’s possible that Isaiah was somewhat encouraged to make such a bold threat by his knowledge of the preparations that Syria and Israel were already making to invade Judah. The idea of Jerusalem as the center of a vast empire devoted to Jehovah, while sensible under a successful ruler like Uzziah, became unrealistic when every one of Uzziah's and Jotham's tributaries revolted against their successor, Ahaz. However, Isaiah says nothing about these external movements. He is entirely focused on Judah's sin. It is his deepening awareness of his fellow citizens' corruption that has caused him to turn away from the ideal city of his early ministry and transformed him into a prophet of Jerusalem's destruction. Their tongue and their actions are against the Lord, to provoke the eyes of His glory. Judges, prophets, and elders—all the upper classes and helpful leaders of the people—must perish. It signifies the degradation to which society will be reduced when Isaiah sarcastically depicts the desperate people choosing a certain man to be their ruler simply because he alone has a coat on his back! (iii. 6).
With increased scorn Isaiah turns lastly upon the women of Jerusalem (iii. 16-iv. 2), and here perhaps the change which has passed over him since his opening prophecy is most striking. One likes to think of how the citizens of Jerusalem took this alteration in their prophet's temper. We know how popular so optimist a prophecy as that of the mountain of the Lord's house must have been, and can imagine how men and women loved the young face, bright with a far-off light, and the dream of an ideal that had no quarrel with the present. "But what a change is this that has come over him, who speaks not of to-morrow, but of to-day, who has brought his gaze from those distant horizons to our streets, who stares every man in the face (iii. 9), and makes the women feel that no pin and trimming, no ring and bracelet, escape his notice! Our loved prophet has become an impudent scorner!" Ah, men and women of Jerusalem, beware of those eyes! The glory of God is burning in them; they see you through and through, and they tell us that all your armour and[30] the show of your countenance, and your foreign fashions are as nothing, for there are corrupt hearts below. This is your judgement, that instead of sweet spices there shall be rottenness, and instead of a girdle a rope, and instead of well-set hair baldness, and instead of a stomacher a girding of sackcloth, and branding instead of beauty. Thy men shall fall by the sword, and thy mighty in the war. And her gates shall lament and mourn, and she shall be desolate and sit upon the ground!
With increasing disdain, Isaiah finally addresses the women of Jerusalem (iii. 16-iv. 2), and here the shift in his demeanor since his initial prophecy is most apparent. It’s interesting to consider how the people of Jerusalem reacted to this change in their prophet’s attitude. We know how popular such an optimistic vision as the prophecy of the mountain of the Lord's house must have been, and we can picture how everyone admired the young face, glowing with distant hope, and a dream of an ideal that didn’t clash with the present. "But what a shift has happened to him, who no longer speaks of tomorrow, but of today, who has directed his gaze from those far-off horizons to our streets, who looks every man in the eye (iii. 9), and makes the women feel that no pin or decoration, no ring or bracelet, escapes his attention! Our beloved prophet has turned into an audacious critic!" Ah, men and women of Jerusalem, beware of those eyes! The glory of God is shining in them; they see you completely, and they reveal that all your adornments and[30] the display of your appearance, and your foreign styles are meaningless, for corrupt hearts lie beneath. This is your judgment, that instead of sweet spices there shall be decay, and instead of a belt a rope, and instead of styled hair baldness, and instead of a fine robe a sackcloth girdle, and instead of beauty a brand. Your men shall fall by the sword, and your warriors in battle. And her gates shall mourn and grieve, and she shall be desolate and sit on the ground!
This was the climax of the prophet's judgement. If the salt have lost its savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is thenceforth good for nothing but to be cast out and trodden under foot. If the women are corrupt the state is moribund.
This was the peak of the prophet's judgment. If the salt has lost its flavor, how can it be made salty again? It's good for nothing but to be thrown out and trampled underfoot. If the women are corrupt, the state is dying.
III. The Prophet of the Lord (iv. 2-6).
III. The Prophet of the Lord (iv. 2-6).
Is there, then, no hope for Jerusalem? Yes, but not where the prophet sought it at first, in herself, and not in the way he offered it—by the mere presentation of an ideal. There is hope, there is more—there is certain salvation in the Lord, but it only comes after judgement. Contrast that opening picture of the new Jerusalem with this closing one, and we shall find their difference to lie in two things. There the city is more prominent than the Lord, here the Lord is more prominent than the city; there no word of judgement, here judgement sternly emphasized as the indispensable way towards the blessed future. A more vivid sense of the Person of Jehovah Himself, a deep conviction of the necessity of chastisement: these are what Isaiah has gained during his early ministry, without losing hope or heart for the future. The bliss shall come only when the Lord shall have washed away the filth of the daughters of Zion, and shall have purged the blood of Jerusalem from the midst[31] thereof by the spirit of judgement and the spirit of burning. It is a corollary of all this that the participants of that future shall be many fewer than in the first vision of the prophet. The process of judgement must weed men out, and in place of all nations coming to Jerusalem, to share its peace and glory, the prophet can speak now only of Israel—and only of a remnant of Israel. The escaped of Israel, the left in Zion, and he that remaineth in Jerusalem. This is a great change in Isaiah's ideal, from the supremacy of Israel over all nations to the bare survival of a remnant of his people.
Is there no hope for Jerusalem? Yes, but not in the way the prophet initially looked for it—within herself, and not through simply presenting an ideal. There is hope, even more—there is true salvation in the Lord, but it only comes after judgment. If we compare the opening vision of the new Jerusalem with this closing one, we'll see the differences lie in two main aspects. In the first, the city stands out more than the Lord, but here, the Lord takes center stage over the city; in the first, there's no mention of judgment, while here, judgment is highlighted as the essential path to the blessed future. A deeper understanding of Jehovah's presence and a strong belief in the need for discipline: these are what Isaiah has gained during his early ministry, without losing hope or enthusiasm for the future. The happiness will come only when the Lord has wiped away the dirt of the daughters of Zion and has cleansed the blood of Jerusalem from among[31] them through the spirit of judgment and the spirit of purification. As a result of all this, there will be far fewer participants in that future compared to the prophet's initial vision. The process of judgment must narrow down the people, and instead of all nations coming to Jerusalem to share in its peace and glory, the prophet can now only speak of Israel—and just a remnant of Israel. The survivors of Israel, the ones left in Zion, and those who remain in Jerusalem. This marks a significant shift in Isaiah's vision, from Israel's dominance over all nations to the mere survival of a remnant of his people.
Is there not in this threefold vision a parallel and example for our own civilisation and our thoughts about it? All work and wisdom begin in dreams. We must see our Utopias before we start to build our stone and lime cities.
Isn’t there a parallel in this threefold vision for our own civilization and our thoughts about it? All work and knowledge start with dreams. We have to envision our ideal societies before we begin to construct our brick and mortar cities.
To move a body, it takes a person of great character.
To encourage people towards a cleaner lifestyle;
It takes the ideal to go an inch deeper.
The dust of reality.
But the light of our ideals dawns upon us only to show how poor by nature are the mortals who are called to accomplish them. The ideal rises still as to Isaiah only to exhibit the poverty of the real. When we lift our eyes from the hills of vision, and rest them on our fellow-men, hope and enthusiasm die out of us. Isaiah's disappointment is that of every one who brings down his gaze from the clouds to the streets. Be our ideal ever so desirable, be we ever so persuaded of its facility, the moment we attempt to apply it we shall be[32] undeceived. Society cannot be regenerated all at once. There is an expression which Isaiah emphasizes in his motive of cynicism: The show of their countenance doth witness against them. It tells us that when he called his countrymen to turn to the light he lifted upon them he saw nothing but the exhibition of their sin made plain. When we bring light to a cavern whose inhabitants have lost their eyes by the darkness, the light does not make them see; we have to give them eyes again. Even so no vision or theory of a perfect state—the mistake which all young reformers make—can regenerate society. It will only reveal social corruption, and sicken the heart of the reformer himself. For the possession of a great ideal does not mean, as so many fondly imagine, work accomplished; it means work revealed—work revealed so vast, often so impossible, that faith and hope die down, and the enthusiast of yesterday becomes the cynic of to-morrow. Cease ye from man, whose breath is in his nostrils, for wherein is he to be accounted? In this despair, through which every worker for God and man must pass, many a warm heart has grown cold, many an intellect become paralyzed. There is but one way of escape, and that is Isaiah's. It is to believe in God Himself; it is to believe that He is at work, that His purposes to man are saving purposes, and that with Him there is an inexhaustible source of mercy and virtue. So from the blackest pessimism shall arise new hope and faith, as from beneath Isaiah's darkest verses that glorious passage suddenly bursts like uncontrollable spring from the very feet of winter. For that day shall the spring of the Lord be beautiful and glorious, and the fruit of[33] the land shall be excellent and comely for them that are escaped of Israel. This is all it is possible to say. There must be a future for man, because God loves him, and God reigns. That future can be reached only through judgement, because God is righteous.
But the light of our ideals shines on us only to reveal how fundamentally flawed we are as humans called to realize them. The ideal emerges like in Isaiah's time, only to show the shortcomings of reality. When we look up from our visions and focus on our fellow humans, hope and enthusiasm fade away. Isaiah's disappointment reflects that of anyone who brings their gaze down from the clouds to the streets. No matter how desirable our ideal is or how convinced we are of its feasibility, the moment we try to implement it, we will be[32] disillusioned. Society can't be transformed all at once. There’s a phrase Isaiah highlights in his cynical view: The show of their countenance doth witness against them. This means that when he called his people to follow the light he saw, he was met only with the visible signs of their sins. When we bring light into a cave where the residents have lost their sight in the darkness, the light doesn’t help them see; we have to restore their sight first. In the same way, no vision or theory of a perfect society—the mistake young reformers often make—can transform society. It only exposes social corruption and can demoralize the reformer. Holding a great ideal does not mean, as many wishful thinkers believe, that work has been done; it means work has been revealed—work that is so extensive and often seemingly impossible that faith and hope diminish, turning yesterday’s enthusiast into tomorrow’s cynic. Cease ye from man, whose breath is in his nostrils, for wherein is he to be accounted? In this despair that everyone striving for God and humanity must experience, many warm hearts have turned cold, and many sharp minds have become dull. There is only one way out, and that’s Isaiah's. It is to believe in God Himself; to believe that He is active, that his plans for humanity are ones of salvation, and that with Him there is an endless supply of mercy and goodness. Thus, from the depths of pessimism, new hope and faith will arise, just as from Isaiah’s most somber verses a brilliant passage springs forth like uncontrollable growth from the very depths of winter. For that day shall the spring of the Lord be beautiful and glorious, and the fruit of[33]the land shall be excellent and comely for them that are escaped of Israel. This is all that can be said. There must be a future for humanity because God loves him, and God reigns. That future can be achieved only through judgment, because God is righteous.
To put it another way: All of us who live to work for our fellow-men or who hope to lift them higher by our word begin with our own visions of a great future. These visions, though our youth lends to them an original generosity and enthusiasm, are, like Isaiah's, largely borrowed. The progressive instincts of the age into which we are born and the mellow skies of prosperity combine with our own ardour to make our ideal one of splendour. Persuaded of its facility, we turn to real life to apply it. A few years pass. We not only find mankind too stubborn to be forced into our moulds, but we gradually become aware of Another Moulder at work upon our subject, and we stand aside in awe to watch His operations. Human desires and national ideals are not always fulfilled; philosophic theories are discredited by the evolution of fact. Uzziah does not reign for ever; the sceptre falls to Ahaz: progress is checked, and the summer of prosperity draws to an end. Under duller skies ungilded judgement comes to view, cruel and inexorable, crushing even the peaks on which we built our future, yet purifying men and giving earnest of a better future, too. And so life, that mocked the control of our puny fingers, bends groaning to the weight of an Almighty Hand. God also, we perceive as we face facts honestly, has His ideal for men; and though He works so slowly towards His end that our restless eyes are too impatient[34] to follow His order, He yet reveals all that shall be to the humbled heart and the soul emptied of its own visions. Awed and chastened, we look back from His Presence to our old ideals. We are still able to recognize their grandeur and generous hope for men. But we see now how utterly unconnected they are with the present—castles in the air, with no ladders to them from the earth. And even if they were accessible, still to our eyes, purged by gazing on God's own ways, they would no more appear desirable. Look back on Isaiah's early ideal from the light of his second vision of the future. For all its grandeur, that picture of Jerusalem is not wholly attractive. Is there not much national arrogance in it? Is it not just the imperfectly idealized reflection of an age of material prosperity such as that of Uzziah's was? Pride is in it, a false optimism, the highest good to be reached without moral conflict. But here is the language of pity, rescue with difficulty, rest only after sore struggle and stripping, salvation by the bare arm of God. So do our imaginations for our own future or for that of the race always contrast with what He Himself has in store for us, promised freely out of His great grace to our unworthy hearts, yet granted in the end only to those who pass towards it through discipline, tribulation and fire.
To put it another way: All of us who are dedicated to helping others or who aspire to elevate them with our words start with our own visions of a bright future. These visions, although fueled by the original generosity and enthusiasm of our youth, are, like Isaiah's, mostly borrowed. The forward-thinking instincts of the time we are born into, along with the flattering circumstances of prosperity, blend with our own passion to create an ideal that shines. Convinced of its attainability, we look to real life to put it into practice. A few years go by. We find that humanity is too stubborn to fit into our designs, and we slowly become aware of Another Designer at work on our subject, and we step back in awe to observe His workings. Human desires and national dreams aren't always realized; philosophical theories are undermined by the unfolding of reality. Uzziah doesn’t reign forever; the scepter falls to Ahaz: progress stalls, and the season of prosperity comes to a close. Under grayer skies, unvarnished judgment emerges, harsh and relentless, crushing even the peaks upon which we built our future, yet purifying humanity and promising a better future as well. And so life, which mocked the control of our feeble hands, bends under the weight of an Almighty Hand. We also realize, as we confront the facts honestly, that God has His own vision for humanity; and even though He works so slowly toward His goal that our restless eyes are too impatient to perceive His plan, He reveals everything that will be to the humbled heart and the soul emptied of its own ambitions. Awed and humbled, we look back from His Presence to our old ideals. We can still recognize their greatness and generous hope for humanity. But now we see how completely disconnected they are from the present—castles in the air, with no ladders to reach them from the ground. And even if they were reachable, they would no longer seem desirable to us, our perceptions cleansed by looking at God's own ways. Reflect on Isaiah's early vision from the perspective of his later vision of the future. Despite its grandeur, that view of Jerusalem isn't entirely appealing. Isn’t there a lot of national arrogance in it? Isn’t it just an imperfectly idealized reflection of a time of material prosperity like that of Uzziah’s? There is pride in it, a false optimism, the notion of achieving the highest good without any moral struggle. But here is a message of compassion, rescue achieved with great difficulty, rest only after immense struggle and sacrifice, salvation by the bare arm of God. So our imaginations for our own future or for that of humanity frequently contrast with what He has planned for us, promised freely out of His immense grace to our undeserving hearts, yet ultimately granted only to those who reach it through discipline, tribulation, and fire.
This, then, was Isaiah's apprenticeship, and its net result was to leave him with the remnant for his ideal: the remnant and Jerusalem secured as its rallying-point.
This was Isaiah's training, and the outcome was that he was left with the remnant as his ideal: the remnant and Jerusalem established as its focal point.
CHAPTER III.
THE VINEYARD OF THE LORD, OR TRUE PATRIOTISM THE CONSCIENCE OF OUR COUNTRY'S SINS.
Isaiah v.; ix. 8-x. 4 (735 B.C.).
Isaiah v.; ix. 8-x. 4 (735 B.C.E.).
The prophecy contained in these chapters belongs, as we have seen, to the same early period of Isaiah's career as chapters ii.-iv., about the time when Ahaz ascended the throne after the long and successful reigns of his father and grandfather, when the kingdom of Judah seemed girt with strength and filled with wealth, but the men were corrupt and the women careless, and the earnest of approaching judgement was already given in the incapacity of the weak and woman-ridden king. Yet although this new prophecy issues from the same circumstances as its predecessors, it implies these circumstances a little more developed. The same social evils are treated, but by a hand with a firmer grasp of them. The same principles are emphasized—the righteousness of Jehovah and His activity in judgement—but the form of judgement of which Isaiah had spoken before in general terms looms nearer, and before the end of the prophecy we get a view at close quarters of the Assyrian ranks.
The prophecy in these chapters, as we've observed, comes from the same early part of Isaiah's career as chapters ii.-iv., around the time when Ahaz took the throne after the long and successful reigns of his father and grandfather. At that time, the kingdom of Judah seemed strong and prosperous, but the people were corrupt and the women were indifferent. The signs of impending judgment were already evident in the weakness of the king, who was influenced by women. Even though this new prophecy arises from the same situation as the earlier ones, it reflects those circumstances in a more developed way. The same social issues are addressed, but with a clearer understanding. The same principles are highlighted—the righteousness of God and His role in judgment—but the type of judgment that Isaiah had previously described in broad terms is now coming into focus, and by the end of the prophecy, we see the Assyrian army up close.
Besides, opposition has arisen to the prophet's teaching. We saw that the obscurities and inconsistencies of chapters ii.-iv. are due to the fact that that prophecy[36] represents several stages of experience through which Isaiah passed before he gained his final convictions. But his countrymen, it appears, have now had time to turn on these convictions and call them in question: it is necessary for Isaiah to vindicate them. The difference, then, between these two sets of prophecies, dealing with the same things, is that in the former (chapters ii.-iv.), we have the obscure and tortuous path of a conviction struggling to light in the prophet's own experience; here, in chapter v., we have its careful array in the light and before the people.
Besides, there has been opposition to the prophet's teaching. We observed that the unclear and inconsistent parts of chapters ii.-iv. are due to the fact that this prophecy[36] represents several stages of experience that Isaiah went through before he solidified his final beliefs. However, it seems that his fellow countrymen have now had the opportunity to question these beliefs: Isaiah needs to justify them. So, the difference between these two sets of prophecies, which address the same topics, is that in the former (chapters ii.-iv.), we see the unclear and complicated process of a belief emerging in the prophet's own experience; while in chapter v., we observe it carefully laid out in the open for the people.
The point of Isaiah's teaching against which opposition was directed was of course its main point, that God was about to abandon Judah. This must have appeared to the popular religion of the day as the rankest heresy. To the Jews the honour of Jehovah was bound up with the inviolability of Jerusalem and the prosperity of Judah. But Isaiah knew Jehovah to be infinitely more concerned for the purity of His people than for their prosperity. He had seen the Lord exalted in righteousness above those national and earthly interests, with which vulgar men exclusively identified His will. Did the people appeal to the long time Jehovah had graciously led them for proof that He would not abandon them now? To Isaiah that gracious leading was but for righteousness' sake, and that God might make His own a holy people. Their history, so full of the favours of the Almighty, did not teach Isaiah as it did the common prophets of his time, the lesson of Israel's political security, but the far different one of their religious responsibility. To him it only meant what Amos had already put in those startling words, You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will visit upon you all your[37] iniquities. Now Isaiah delivered this doctrine at a time when it brought him the hostility of men's passions as well as of their opinions. Judah was arming for war. Syria and Ephraim were marching upon her. To threaten his country with ruin in such an hour was to run the risk of suffering from popular fury as a traitor as well as from priestly prejudice as a heretic. The strain of the moment is felt in the strenuousness of the prophecy. Chapter v., with its appendix, exhibits more grasp and method than its predecessors. Its literary form is finished, its feeling clear. There is a tenderness in the beginning of it, an inexorableness in the end and an eagerness all through, which stamp the chapter as Isaiah's final appeal to his countrymen at this period of his career.
The core of Isaiah's teaching, which faced significant opposition, was that God was about to forsake Judah. At the time, this must have seemed like a shocking heresy to mainstream religion. For the Jews, God's honor was tied to the security of Jerusalem and Judah's prosperity. However, Isaiah understood that God cared much more about the purity of His people than their prosperity. He recognized the Lord as being above national and earthly concerns, which many people mistakenly equated with His will. Did the people insist that because God had previously guided them with grace, He wouldn’t abandon them now? To Isaiah, that grace was given solely for the sake of righteousness, so God could have a holy people. Their history, filled with God’s blessings, did not teach Isaiah the lesson of Israel’s political security like it did for other prophets of his time; instead, it highlighted their religious responsibility. To him, it echoed what Amos had said in those striking words, “You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will visit upon you all your [37] iniquities.” Isaiah proclaimed this message at a time when it drew both popular anger and opposition from the authorities. Judah was preparing for war, with Syria and Ephraim advancing against her. To warn his nation of impending disaster during such a critical period put him at risk of being labeled a traitor as well as a heretic. The urgency of the situation is evident in the intensity of his prophecy. Chapter five, along with its appendix, shows greater depth and organization than earlier chapters. Its literary structure is refined, and the emotions are evident. There’s a tenderness at the start, a relentless tone at the end, and an eagerness throughout, marking this chapter as Isaiah's final appeal to his fellow countrymen during this stage of his life.
The chapter is a noble piece of patriotism—one of the noblest of a race who, although for the greater part of their history without a fatherland, have contributed more brilliantly than perhaps any other to the literature of patriotism, and that simply because, as Isaiah here illustrates, patriotism was to their prophets identical with religious privilege and responsibility. Isaiah carries this to its bitter end. Other patriots have wept to sing their country's woes; Isaiah's burden is his people's guilt. To others an invasion of their fatherland by its enemies has been the motive to rouse by song or speech their countrymen to repel it. Isaiah also hears the tramp of the invader; but to him is permitted no ardour of defence, and his message to his countrymen is that they must succumb, for the invasion is irresistible and of the very judgement of God. How much it cost the prophet to deliver such a message we may see from those few verses of it in which his heart is not altogether silenced by his conscience. The sweet description of Judah as[38] a vineyard, and the touching accents that break through the roll of denunciation with such phrases as My people are gone away into captivity unawares, tell us how the prophet's love of country is struggling with his duty to a righteous God. The course of feeling throughout the prophecy is very striking. The tenderness of the opening lyric seems ready to flow into gentle pleading with the whole people. But as the prophet turns to particular classes and their sins his mood changes to indignation, the voice settles down to judgement; till when it issues upon that clear statement of the coming of the Northern hosts every trace of emotion has left it, and the sentences ring out as unfaltering as the tramp of the armies they describe.
The chapter is a powerful expression of patriotism—one of the strongest from a group of people who, for most of their history lacking a homeland, have contributed more significantly than perhaps anyone else to the literature of patriotism. This is largely because, as Isaiah shows here, patriotism for their prophets was the same as religious privilege and responsibility. Isaiah takes this to its harsh conclusion. While other patriots have cried to express their country’s suffering, Isaiah’s burden is the guilt of his people. For others, an invasion of their homeland by enemies has motivated them to inspire their fellow countrymen through song or speech to fight back. Isaiah also hears the invader's approach; however, he is not allowed the passion of defense, and his message to his people is that they must surrender because the invasion is unstoppable and is the very judgment of God. We can see the cost of delivering such a message from the few verses where his heart isn’t entirely silenced by his conscience. The beautiful description of Judah as a vineyard, along with the heartfelt phrases that break through the condemnation, such as My people are gone away into captivity unawares, reveal how the prophet’s love for his country is at odds with his duty to a just God. The emotional trajectory throughout the prophecy is quite striking. The gentle tone of the opening seems poised to transition into a soft plea to the entire nation. But as the prophet addresses specific groups and their sins, his mood shifts to anger, and his voice becomes firm with judgment; until, when he delivers the clear announcement of the Northern armies' arrival, all traces of emotion have vanished, and his words strike out as unwavering as the march of the armies they portray.
I. The Parable of the Vineyard (v. 1-7).
I. The Vineyard Parable (v. 1-7).
Isaiah adopts the resource of every misunderstood and unpopular teacher, and seeks to turn the flank of his people's prejudices by an attack in parable on their sympathies. Did they stubbornly believe it impossible for God to abandon a State He had so long and so carefully fostered? Let them judge from an analogous case in which they were all experts. In a picture of great beauty Isaiah describes a vineyard upon one of the sunny promontories visible from Jerusalem. Every care had been given it of which an experienced vine-dresser could think, but it brought forth only wild grapes. The vine-dresser himself is introduced, and appeals to the men of Judah and Jerusalem to judge between him and his vineyard. He gets their assent that all had been done which could be done, and fortified with that resolves to abandon the vineyard. I will lay it waste; it shall not be pruned nor digged, but there shall come up briers and thorns. Then the[39] stratagem comes out, the speaker drops the tones of a human cultivator, and in the omnipotence of the Lord of heaven he is heard to say, I will also command the clouds that they rain no rain upon it. This diversion upon their sympathies having succeeded, the prophet scarcely needs to charge the people's prejudices in face. His point has been evidently carried. For the vineyard of Jehovah of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant; and He looked for judgement, but behold oppression, for righteousness, but behold a cry.
Isaiah uses the strategy of every misunderstood and unpopular teacher, trying to sidestep his people's biases by launching a parable that resonates with their feelings. Did they stubbornly think it was impossible for God to abandon a state He had nurtured for so long? He invites them to consider a similar case they all understand. In a beautifully crafted image, Isaiah paints a picture of a vineyard on one of the sunny cliffs visible from Jerusalem. Every possible care that an experienced vine-dresser could think of was given to it, yet it only produced wild grapes. The vine-dresser himself appears and asks the people of Judah and Jerusalem to judge between him and his vineyard. They agree that he has done everything he could, and with their support, he decides to abandon the vineyard. I will lay it waste; it shall not be pruned nor digged, but there shall come up briers and thorns. Then the[39] stratagem unfolds; the speaker shifts from being a human caretaker to the Almighty Lord of heaven, declaring, I will also command the clouds that they rain no rain upon it. After successfully engaging their sympathies, the prophet hardly needs to confront the people's biases directly. His message has clearly landed. For the vineyard of Jehovah of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant; and He looked for judgment, but behold oppression, for righteousness, but behold a cry.
The lesson enforced by Isaiah is just this, that in a people's civilization there lie the deepest responsibilities, for that is neither more nor less than their cultivation by God; and the question for a people is not how secure does this render them, nor what does it count for glory, but how far is it rising towards the intentions of its Author? Does it produce those fruits of righteousness for which alone God cares to set apart and cultivate the peoples? On this depends the question whether the civilization is secure, as well as the right of the people to enjoy and feel proud of it. There cannot be true patriotism without sensitiveness to this, for however rich be the elements that compose the patriot's temper, as piety towards the past, ardour of service for the present, love of liberty, delight in natural beauty and gratitude for Divine favour, so rich a temper will grow rancid without the salt of conscience; and the richer the temper is, the greater must be the proportion of that salt. All prophets and poets of patriotism have been moralists and satirists as well. From Demosthenes to Tourgenieff, from Dante to Mazzini, from Milton to Russell Lowell, from Burns to Heine, one cannot recall any great patriot who has not known how to use the scourge as well as the trumpet. Many opportunities[40] will present themselves to us of illustrating Isaiah's orations by the letters and speeches of Cromwell, who of moderns most resembles the statesman-prophet of Judah; but nowhere does the resemblance become so close as when we lay a prophecy like this of Jehovah's vineyard by the side of the speeches in which the Lord Protector exhorted the Commons of England, although it was the hour of his and their triumph, to address themselves to their sins.
The lesson emphasized by Isaiah is simply this: in the civilization of a people lies their greatest responsibility, as it reflects how they are nurtured by God. The question for a society isn’t about how safe this makes them or what it means for their glory, but rather how much it aligns with the intentions of its Creator. Does it yield the fruits of righteousness that God desires for His people? The security of their civilization depends on this, as does their right to enjoy and take pride in it. True patriotism cannot exist without being sensitive to this reality. No matter how rich the attributes of a patriot—such as respect for the past, dedication to the present, love of freedom, appreciation of nature, and thankfulness for Divine favor—that richness will become sour without the seasoning of conscience. The more affluent the character, the greater the need for that seasoning. All great prophets and patriots have also been moralists and satirists. From Demosthenes to Turgenev, from Dante to Mazzini, from Milton to Russell Lowell, from Burns to Heine, you won’t find a significant patriot who didn’t know how to wield both the lash and the trumpet. Many opportunities[40] will arise for us to illustrate Isaiah's messages through the letters and speeches of Cromwell, who is most akin to the statesman-prophet of Judah among modern figures. However, the similarity becomes most evident when we compare a prophecy about Jehovah's vineyard with the speeches in which Oliver Cromwell urged the Commons of England, even in their moment of triumph, to confront their sins.
So, then, the patriotism of all great men has carried a conscience for their country's sins. But while this is always more or less a burden to the true patriot, there are certain periods in which his care for his country ought to be this predominantly, and need be little else. In a period like our own, for instance, of political security and fashionable religion, what need is there in patriotic displays of any other kind? but how much for patriotism of this kind—of men who will uncover the secret sins, however loathsome, and declare the hypocrisies, however powerful, of the social life of the people! These are the patriots we need in times of peace; and as it is more difficult to rouse a torpid people to their sins than to lead a roused one against their enemies, and harder to face a whole people with the support only of conscience than to defy many nations if you but have your own at your back, so these patriots of peace are more to be honoured than those of war. But there is one kind of patriotism more arduous and honourable still. It is that which Isaiah displays here, who cannot add to his conscience hope or even pity, who must hail his country's enemies for his country's good, and recite the long roll of God's favours to his nation only to emphasize the justice of His abandonment of them.
So, the patriotism of all great people carries a weight for their country's wrongdoings. While this is always a bit of a burden for the true patriot, there are certain times when their concern for their country should be the main focus and not much else. In a time like ours, for example, where political stability and trendy beliefs are the norm, what other kind of patriotic displays are necessary? But how important is it to have patriots who will reveal the hidden wrongs, no matter how unpleasant, and expose the hypocrisies, no matter how influential, of our society? These are the patriots we need during peaceful times; and since it’s more challenging to wake up an apathetic people about their faults than it is to lead an engaged one against their enemies, and since it’s tougher to confront a whole nation relying only on conscience than it is to challenge multiple nations when you have your own behind you, these peace-oriented patriots deserve more respect than those who fight in wars. Yet, there’s one type of patriotism that is even more challenging and honorable. It’s the kind that Isaiah demonstrates here, who cannot bring hope or even compassion to his conscience, who must acknowledge his country's adversaries for the greater good, and recount the long list of God’s blessings to his nation only to highlight the righteousness of His abandonment of them.
The wild grapes which Isaiah saw in the vineyard of the Lord he catalogues in a series of Woes (vv. 8-24), fruits all of them of love of money and love of wine. They are abuse of the soil (8-10, 17[4]), a giddy luxury which has taken to drink (11-16), a moral blindness and headlong audacity of sin which habitual avarice and drunkenness soon develop (18-21), and, again, a greed of drink and money—men's perversion of their strength to wine, and of their opportunities of justice to the taking of bribes (22-24). These are the features of corrupt civilization not only in Judah, and the voice that deplores them cannot speak without rousing others very clamant to the modern conscience. It is with remarkable persistence that in every civilization the two main passions of the human heart, love of wealth and love of pleasure, the instinct to gather and the instinct to squander, have sought precisely these two forms denounced by Isaiah in which to work their social havoc—appropriation of the soil and indulgence in strong drink. Every civilized community develops sooner or later its land-question and its liquor-question. "Questions" they are called by the superficial opinion that all difficulties may be overcome by the cleverness of men; yet problems through which there cries for remedy so vast a proportion of our poverty, crime and madness, are something worse than "questions." They are huge sins, and require not merely the statesman's wit, but all the penitence and zeal of[42] which a nation's conscience is capable. It is in this that the force of Isaiah's treatment lies. We feel he is not facing questions of State, but sins of men. He has nothing to tell us of what he considers the best system of land tenure, but he enforces the principle that in the ease with which land may be absorbed by one person the natural covetousness of the human heart has a terrible opportunity for working ruin upon society. Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there be no room, and ye be made to dwell alone in the midst of the land. We know from Micah that the actual process which Isaiah condemns was carried out with the most cruel evictions and disinheritances. Isaiah does not touch on its methods, but exposes its effects on the country—depopulation and barrenness,—and emphasizes its religious significance. Of a truth many houses shall be desolate, even great and fair, without an inhabitant. For ten acres of vineyard shall yield one bath, and a homer of seed shall yield but an ephah.... Then shall lambs feed as in their pasture, and strangers shall devour the ruins of the fat ones—i.e., of the luxurious landowners (9, 10, 17. See note on previous page). And in one of those elliptic statements by which he often startles us with the sudden sense that God Himself is acquainted with all our affairs, and takes His own interest in them, Isaiah adds, "All this was whispered to me by Jehovah: In mine ears—the Lord of hosts" (ver. 9).
The wild grapes that Isaiah observed in the Lord's vineyard are cataloged in a series of Woes (vv. 8-24), all stemming from a love of money and wine. They signify abuse of the land (8-10, 17[4]), a reckless indulgence that leads to overconsumption (11-16), a moral blindness and reckless sin that habitual greed and drunkenness foster (18-21), as well as a greed for alcohol and wealth—people twisting their strength to drink and their chances for justice to accept bribes (22-24). These traits represent the decay of civilization, not just in Judah, and the cry against them resonates with the modern conscience. It's notable how consistently, in every civilization, the two main desires of the human heart—greed for wealth and desire for pleasure, the urge to collect and the urge to waste—have manifested in the two damaging forms criticized by Isaiah: the exploitation of land and indulgence in alcohol. Every developed society eventually faces its land issue and its liquor issue. They're referred to as "Questions" by those who believe cleverness alone can solve all problems, yet the issues that scream for a solution and contribute significantly to our poverty, crime, and madness are more than just "questions." They are serious sins that need not only a politician's intelligence but also the deep remorse and commitment of a nation’s conscience. That's where the power of Isaiah's message lies. He doesn't just address state issues but rather the sins of humanity. He has no insight to offer regarding the best land ownership system but asserts the principle that if land can easily be monopolized by one person, it gives a dangerous opportunity for the natural greed of people to wreak havoc on society. Woe to those who combine house with house, who add field to field, until there’s no room, and you are forced to live alone in the land. We know from Micah that the situation Isaiah criticizes involved brutal evictions and loss of inheritance. Isaiah doesn't delve into the methods but highlights their consequences on the land—depopulation and barrenness—and stresses their religious implications. Indeed, many houses will be left desolate, even great and beautiful ones, without any inhabitants. Ten acres of vineyard will yield only one bath, and a homer of seed will yield just an ephah... Then the lambs will graze as they do in their pasture, and outsiders will consume the remains of the wealthy—that is, of the lavish landowners (9, 10, 17. See note on previous page). And in one of those striking statements, where he often surprises us with the sudden awareness that God is fully aware of our lives and involved in them, Isaiah adds, "All this was whispered to me by Jehovah: In my ears—the God of hosts" (ver. 9).
During recent agitations in our own country one has often seen the "land laws of the Bible" held forth by some thoughtless demagogue as models for land tenure among ourselves; as if a system which worked well with a small tribe in a land they had all entered on equal footing, and where there was no opportunity[43] for the industry of the people except in pasture and tillage, could possibly be applicable to a vastly larger and more complex population, with different traditions and very different social circumstances. Isaiah says nothing about the peculiar land laws of his people. He lays down principles, and these are principles valid in every civilization. God has made the land, not to feed the pride of the few, but the natural hunger of the many, and it is His will that the most be got out of a country's soil for the people of the country. Whatever be the system of land-tenure—and while all are more or less liable to abuse, it is the duty of a people to agitate for that which will be least liable—if it is taken advantage of by individuals to satisfy their own cupidity, then God will take account of them. There is a responsibility which the State cannot enforce, and the neglect of which cannot be punished by any earthly law, but all the more will God see to it. A nation's treatment of their land is not always prominent as a question which demands the attention of public reformers; but it ceaselessly has interest for God, who ever holds individuals to answer for it. The land-question is ultimately a religious question. For the management of their land the whole nation is responsible to God, but especially those who own or manage estates. This is a sacred office. When one not only remembers the nature of land—how it is an element of life, so that if a man abuse the soil it is as if he poisoned the air or darkened the heavens—but appreciates also the multitude of personal relations which the landowner or factor holds in his hand—the peace of homes, the continuity of local traditions, the physical health, the social fearlessness and frankness, and the thousand delicate associations which[44] their habitations entwine about the hearts of men—one feels that to all who possess or manage land is granted an opportunity of patriotism and piety open to few, a ministry less honourable and sacred than none other committed by God to man for his fellow-men.
During recent protests in our own country, some careless politician has often showcased the "land laws of the Bible" as examples for our land ownership system; as if a model that worked well for a small tribe in a place where everyone started on equal ground, and where the only opportunities for the people's work were in farming and grazing, could somehow apply to a much larger and more complex population with different traditions and very different social situations. Isaiah doesn't talk about the specific land laws of his people. He sets out principles, and these are valid in every civilization. God created the land not to satisfy the pride of a few, but to meet the needs of the many, and it is His will that a country's resources benefit its people as much as possible. Regardless of the land-tenure system—since all have some potential for abuse—it is the duty of the people to strive for the one that's least likely to be misused. If individuals exploit it for their own greed, God will hold them accountable. There is a responsibility that the State can't enforce, and ignoring it can't be punished by any human law, but God will ensure it is addressed. A nation's management of their land may not always be a hot topic for public reformers, but it is of constant interest to God, who holds individuals responsible for it. The land issue is ultimately a religious one. The entire nation is accountable to God for how they manage their land, especially those who own or oversee estates. This is a sacred role. When one remembers the nature of land—how it is essential for life, so that abusing the soil is akin to poisoning the air or darkening the sky—and also understands the numerous personal connections that the landowner or manager has—the peace of homes, the continuity of local traditions, the physical health, the social confidence and openness, and the countless subtle ties that their locations create around people's hearts—one realizes that those who own or manage land have a unique opportunity for patriotism and devotion that few others have, a ministry as honorable and sacred as any that God has entrusted to humanity for the benefit of others.
After the land-sin Isaiah hurls his second Woe upon the drink-sin, and it is a heavier woe than the first. With fatal persistence the luxury of every civilization has taken to drink; and of all the indictments brought by moralists against nations, that which they reserve for drunkenness is, as here, the most heavily weighted. The crusade against drink is not the novel thing that many imagine who observe only its late revival among ourselves. In ancient times there was scarcely a State in which prohibitive legislation of the most stringent kind was not attempted, and generally carried out with a thoroughness more possible under despots than where, as with us, the slow consent of public opinion is necessary. A horror of strong drink has in every age possessed those who from their position as magistrates or prophets have been able to follow for any distance the drifts of social life. Isaiah exposes as powerfully as ever any of them did in what the peculiar fatality of drinking lies. Wine is a mocker by nothing more than by the moral incredulity which it produces, enabling men to hide from themselves the spiritual and material effects of over-indulgence in it. No one who has had to do with persons slowly falling from moderate to immoderate drinking can mistake Isaiah's meaning when he says, They regard not the work of the Lord; neither have they considered the operation of His hands. Nothing kills the conscience like steady drinking to a little excess; and religion, even while the conscience is alive, acts on it only as an opiate. It is not, however,[45] with the symptoms of drink in individuals so much as with its aggregate effects on the nation that Isaiah is concerned. So prevalent is excessive drinking, so entwined with the social customs of the country and many powerful interests, that it is extremely difficult to rouse public opinion to its effects. And so they go into captivity for lack of knowledge. Temperance reformers are often blamed for the strength of their language, but they may shelter themselves behind Isaiah. As he pictures it, the national destruction caused by drink is complete. It is nothing less than the people's captivity, and we know what that meant to an Israelite. It affects all classes: Their honourable men are famished, and their multitude parched with thirst.... The mean man is bowed down, and the great man is humbled. But the want and ruin of this earth are not enough to describe it. The appetite of hell itself has to be enlarged to suffice for the consumption of the spoils of strong drink. Therefore hell hath enlarged her desire and opened her mouth without measure; and their glory, and their multitude, and their pomp, and he that rejoiceth among them, descend into it. The very appetite of hell has to be enlarged! Does it not truly seem as if the wild and wanton waste of drink were preventable, as if it were not, as many are ready to sneer, the inevitable evil of men's hearts choosing this form of issue, but a superfluous audacity of sin, which the devil himself did not desire or tempt men to? It is this feeling of the infernal gratuitousness of most of the drink-evil—the conviction that here hell would be quiet if only she were not stirred up by the extraordinarily wanton provocatives that society and the State offer to excessive drinking—which compels temperance reformers at the present day to isolate[46] drunkenness and make it the object of a special crusade. Isaiah's strong figure has lost none of its strength to-day. When our judges tell us from the bench that nine-tenths of pauperism and crime are caused by drink, and our physicians that if only irregular tippling were abolished half the current sickness of the land would cease, and our statesmen that the ravages of strong drink are equal to those of the historical scourges of war, famine and pestilence combined, surely to swallow such a glut of spoil the appetite of hell must have been still more enlarged, and the mouth of hell made yet wider.
After the land-sin, Isaiah directs his second Woe at the drinking problem, and it's even more severe than the first. With relentless determination, the luxury of every civilization has turned to alcohol; and of all the charges moralists bring against nations, the one they weigh most heavily is drunkenness, just like here. The fight against alcohol isn't a new idea, as many might think who only see its recent resurgence among us. In ancient times, nearly every state tried to implement strict prohibitions on alcohol, often carried out with a thoroughness that was easier under despots than in places where, like us, public opinion takes time to build. Throughout history, those in positions of authority or wisdom have had a deep aversion to strong drink, able to recognize long-term social trends. Isaiah clearly shows what the unique dangers of drinking are. Wine is deceptive, especially because it creates moral doubt, allowing people to ignore the spiritual and material consequences of overindulging. Anyone who has witnessed people gradually shift from moderate to excessive drinking can grasp Isaiah's message when he says, They regard not the work of the Lord; neither have they considered the operation of His hands. Nothing deadens the conscience like consistent drinking, even in cases of slight excess, and religion, even when the conscience is alert, often serves merely as a sedative. However, Isaiah is more concerned with the collective effects of drinking on the nation than with individual cases. Excessive drinking is so widespread, so intertwined with social customs and powerful interests, that awakening public opinion to its consequences is extremely challenging. And so they go into captivity for lack of knowledge. Temperance advocates are often criticized for their strong language, but they can find support in Isaiah. He portrays the national devastation caused by alcohol as absolute. It amounts to the people’s captivity, which meant a great deal to an Israelite. It impacts all social classes: Their honorable men are famished, and their multitude parched with thirst.... The mean man is bowed down, and the great man is humbled. But the suffering and destruction of this world do not fully capture it. The cravings of hell itself must be expanded to manage the toll of strong drink. Therefore hell hath enlarged her desire and opened her mouth without measure; and their glory, and their multitude, and their pomp, and he that rejoiceth among them, descend into it. The very cravings of hell need to be increased! Does it not seem that the reckless and destructive use of alcohol is preventable, as if it were not, as some mockingly claim, the unavoidable curse of human hearts, but rather a reckless form of sin that the devil himself didn’t want or encourage? It is this sense of the needless suffering caused by much of the drinking problem—the belief that hell would be at peace if it weren’t stirred up by the shocking temptations that society and the State provide for excessive drinking—that drives modern temperance activists to single out drunkenness and launch a specific campaign against it. Isaiah's powerful imagery still resonates today. When our judges inform us from the bench that nine out of ten cases of poverty and crime are due to alcohol, and our doctors tell us that if casual drinking were eliminated, half of our nation’s illnesses would vanish, and our politicians declare that the harm caused by strong drink rivals that of war, famine, and plague combined, it’s clear that to absorb such a massive amount of destruction, the appetite of hell must have been even more expanded, and the mouth of hell made yet wider.
The next three Woes are upon different aggravations of that moral perversity which the prophet has already traced to strong drink. In the first of these it is better to read, draw punishment near with cords of vanity, than draw iniquity. Then we have a striking antithesis—the drunkards mocking Isaiah over their cups with the challenge, as if it would not be taken up, Let Jehovah make speed, and hasten His work of judgement, that we may see it, while all the time they themselves were dragging that judgement near, as with cart-ropes, by their persistent diligence in evil. This figure of sinners jeering at the approach of a calamity while they actually wear the harness of its carriage is very striking. But the Jews are not only unconscious of judgement, they are confused as to the very principles of morality: Who call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
The next three Woes focus on different aspects of the moral corruption that the prophet has already linked to alcohol. In the first of these, it's better to read, bring punishment closer with ropes of vanity, than bring iniquity. Then we see a powerful contrast—the drunkards mocking Isaiah over their drinks with the challenge, as if it wouldn't be accepted, Let Jehovah hurry up and speed up His work of judgment, so we can see it, while all the time they were pulling that judgment closer, like with cart-ropes, through their relentless commitment to wrongdoing. This image of sinners laughing at the impending disaster while they are actually lugging its burden is striking. But the Jews are not only unaware of the judgment; they are also mixed up about the very basics of morality: Who call evil good, and good evil; who switch darkness for light, and light for darkness; who trade bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
In his fifth Woe the prophet attacks a disposition to which his scorn gives no peace throughout his ministry. If these sensualists had only confined themselves to their sensuality they might have been left alone; but with that intellectual bravado which is equally born with "Dutch courage" of drink, they interfered in[47] the conduct of the State, and prepared arrogant policies of alliance and war that were the distress of the sober-minded prophet all his days. Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes and prudent in their own sight.
In his fifth Woe, the prophet criticizes a mindset that his contempt never allows him to overlook throughout his ministry. If these pleasure-seekers had only stuck to their hedonism, they might have been left alone; but with that false confidence fueled by alcohol, they meddled in[47] the affairs of the State, creating arrogant alliances and war strategies that troubled the clear-headed prophet all his life. Woe to those who think they are wise and clever in their own eyes.
In his last Woe Isaiah returns to the drinking habits of the upper classes, from which it would appear that among the judges even of Judah there were "six-bottle men." They sustained their extravagance by subsidies, which we trust were unknown to the mighty men of wine who once filled the seats of justice in our own country. They justify the wicked for a bribe, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him. All these sinners, dead through their rejection of the law of Jehovah of hosts and the word of the Holy One of Israel, shall be like to the stubble, fit only for burning, and their blossom as the dust of the rotten tree.
In his final lament, Isaiah talks about the drinking habits of the wealthy, suggesting that even among the judges of Judah, there were "six-bottle men." They managed their excessive lifestyles through subsidies, which, we hope, were unfamiliar to the powerful drinkers who once held positions of justice in our own country. They justify the wicked for a bribe, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him. All these sinners, who are doomed because they have rejected the law of the Lord of hosts and the word of the Holy One of Israel, will be like straw, only good for burning, and their glory will be like the dust of a decayed tree.
III. The Anger of the Lord (v. 25; ix. 8-x. 4; v. 26-30).
III. God's Anger (v. 25; ix. 8-x. 4; v. 26-30).
This indictment of the various sins of the people occupies the whole of the second part of the oration. But a third part is now added, in which the prophet catalogues the judgements of the Lord upon them, each of these closing with the weird refrain, For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still. The complete catalogue is usually obtained by inserting between the 25th and 26th verses of chapter v. the long passage from chapter ix., ver. 8, to chapter x., ver. 4. It is quite true that as far as chapter v. itself is concerned it does not need this insertion; but ix. 8-x. 4 is decidedly out of place where it now lies. Its paragraphs end with the same refrain as closes v. 25,[48] which forms, besides, a natural introduction to them, while v. 26-30 form as natural a conclusion. The latter verses describe an Assyrian invasion, and it was always in an Assyrian invasion that Isaiah foresaw the final calamity of Judah. We may, then, subject to further light on the exceedingly obscure subject of the arrangement of Isaiah's prophecies, follow some of the leading critics, and place ix. 8-x. 4 between verses 25-26 of chapter v.; and the more we examine them the more we shall be satisfied with our arrangement, for strung together in this order they form one of the most impressive series of scenes which even an Isaiah has given us.
This criticism of the people's various sins takes up the entire second part of the speech. However, a third part is now included, where the prophet lists the Lord's judgments against them, each ending with the eerie refrain, For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still. The full list is generally obtained by inserting a long passage from chapter ix., verse 8, to chapter x., verse 4, between the 25th and 26th verses of chapter v. While it's true that chapter v. itself doesn’t require this insertion, the passage from ix. 8 to x. 4 feels definitely out of place where it currently is. Its sections finish with the same refrain that concludes v. 25,[48], which serves as a natural lead-in, while v. 26-30 provide a fitting conclusion. These latter verses depict an Assyrian invasion, and Isaiah always anticipated that the ultimate disaster for Judah would come with an Assyrian invasion. Therefore, we can align with some leading critics and place ix. 8-x. 4 between verses 25-26 of chapter v., and the more we study them, the more we will appreciate this arrangement, as when linked together in this way, they create one of the most striking series of scenes that even Isaiah has presented.
From these scenes Isaiah has spared nothing that is terrible in history or nature, and it is not one of the least of the arguments for putting them together that their intensity increases to a climax. Earthquakes, armed raids, a great battle and the slaughter of a people; prairie and forest fires, civil strife and the famine fever, that feeds upon itself; another battle-field, with its cringing groups of captives and heaps of slain; the resistless tide of a great invasion; and then, for final prospect, a desolate land by the sound of a hungry sea, and the light is darkened in the clouds thereof. The elements of nature and the elemental passions of man have been let loose together; and we follow the violent floods, remembering that it is sin which has burst the gates of the universe, and given the tides of hell full course through it. Over the storm and battle there comes booming like the storm-bell the awful refrain, For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still. It is poetry of the highest order, but in him who reads it with a conscience mere literary sensations are[49] sobered by the awe of some of the most profound moral phenomena of life. The persistence of Divine wrath, the long-lingering effects of sin in a nation's history, man's abuse of sorrow and his defiance of an angry Providence, are the elements of this great drama. Those who are familiar with King Lear, will recognize these elements, and observe how similarly the ways of Providence and the conduct of men are represented there and here.
From these scenes, Isaiah has not held back anything terrifying from history or nature, and one strong reason for putting them together is that their intensity builds to a climax. Earthquakes, armed invasions, a huge battle, and the massacre of a people; wildfires in prairies and forests, civil unrest, and the self-perpetuating cycle of famine; another battlefield, with its terrified groups of captives and piles of the dead; the unstoppable wave of a massive invasion; and then, to top it all off, a barren land by the sound of a ravenous sea, with the light dimmed in its clouds. The forces of nature and humanity's raw emotions have been unleashed together; and we trace the violent torrents, remembering that it is sin that has broken down the gates of the universe and allowed hell's tides to surge through it. Over the chaos of the storm and battle comes the thunderous refrain, For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still. It is poetry of the highest caliber, but for those who read it with a conscience, mere literary sensations are sobered by the awe of some of life's most profound moral realities. The persistence of Divine wrath, the lingering effects of sin in a nation's history, humanity's misuse of sorrow, and defiance of an angry Providence are the elements of this great drama. Those familiar with King Lear will recognize these elements and see how similarly the actions of Providence and the behavior of people are depicted here and there.
What Isaiah unfolds, then, is a series of calamities that have overtaken the people of Israel. It is impossible for us to identify every one of them with a particular event in Israel's history otherwise known to us. Some it is not difficult to recognize; but the prophet passes in a perplexing way from Judah to Ephraim and Ephraim to Judah, and in one case, where he represents Samaria as attacked by Syria and the Philistines, he goes back to a period at some distance from his own. There are also passages, as for instance x. 1-4, in which we are unable to decide whether he describes a present punishment or threatens a future one. But his moral purpose, at least, is plain. He will show how often Jehovah has already spoken to His people by calamity, and because they have remained hardened under these warnings, how there now remains possible only the last, worst blow of an Assyrian invasion. Isaiah is justifying his threat of so unprecedented and extreme a punishment for God's people as overthrow by this Northern people, who had just appeared upon Judah's political horizon. God, he tells Israel, has tried everything short of this, and it has failed; now only this remains, and this shall not fail. The prophet's purpose, therefore, being not an accurate historical recital, but[50] moral impressiveness, he gives us a more or less ideal description of former calamities, mentioning only so much as to allow us to recognize here and there that it is actual facts which he uses for his purpose of condemning Israel to captivity, and vindicating Israel's God in bringing that captivity near. The passage thus forms a parallel to that in Amos, with its similar refrain: Yet ye have not returned unto Me, saith the Lord (Amos iv. 6-12), and only goes farther than that earlier prophecy in indicating that the instruments of the Lord's final judgement are to be the Assyrians.
What Isaiah reveals is a series of disasters that have struck the people of Israel. It's hard for us to pinpoint each one with a specific event from Israel's history that we already know. Some are easy to identify, but the prophet confusingly shifts between Judah and Ephraim, and at one point, where he describes Samaria being attacked by Syria and the Philistines, he refers back to a time that is somewhat distant from his own. There are also parts, like x. 1-4, where it's unclear whether he is talking about a current punishment or threatening one for the future. However, his moral intent is clear. He aims to show how often Jehovah has already communicated with His people through calamity, and because they have remained stubborn despite these warnings, the only thing left is the final, worst blow of an Assyrian invasion. Isaiah is justifying his threat of such an unprecedented and severe punishment for God's people, as they face a challenge from this Northern power that has just emerged in Judah's political scene. God, he tells Israel, has tried everything else, and it has failed; now only this remains, and this will not fail. The prophet's goal, then, isn't to provide an exact historical account, but to create moral impact, offering a more or less ideal depiction of past disasters, mentioning just enough for us to recognize that he is using real events to condemn Israel to captivity and validate Israel's God in bringing this captivity closer. This passage parallels that in Amos, with its similar refrain: Yet ye have not returned unto Me, saith the Lord (Amos iv. 6-12), and goes further than that earlier prophecy by indicating that the means of the Lord's final judgment will be the Assyrians.
Five great calamities, says Isaiah, have fallen on Israel and left them hardened: 1st, earthquake (v. 25); 2nd, loss of territory (ix. 8-12); 3rd, war and a decisive defeat (ix. 13-17); 4th, internal anarchy (ix. 18-21); 5th, the near prospect of captivity (x. 1-4).
Five major disasters, according to Isaiah, have struck Israel and left them callous: 1st, an earthquake (v. 25); 2nd, loss of land (ix. 8-12); 3rd, war and a significant defeat (ix. 13-17); 4th, internal chaos (ix. 18-21); 5th, the looming threat of captivity (x. 1-4).
1. The Earthquake (v. 25).—Amos closes his series with an earthquake; Isaiah begins with one. It may be the same convulsion they describe, or may not. Although the skirts of Palestine both to the east and west frequently tremble to these disturbances, an earthquake in Palestine itself, up on the high central ridge of the land, is very rare. Isaiah vividly describes its awful simplicity and suddenness. The Lord stretched forth His hand and smote, and the hills shook, and their carcases were like offal in the midst of the streets. More words are not needed, because there was nothing more to describe. The Lord lifted His hand; the hills seemed for a moment to topple over, and when the living recovered from the shock there lay the dead, flung like refuse about the streets.
1. The Quake (v. 25).—Amos ends his series with an earthquake, while Isaiah kicks off his with one. It could be the same event they’re talking about, or it might not be. Although the outskirts of Palestine, both east and west, often shake from these disturbances, an earthquake in Palestine itself, up on the high central ridge of the land, is quite rare. Isaiah vividly depicts its terrifying simplicity and abruptness. The Lord stretched out His hand and struck, and the hills shook, and their bodies were like garbage in the streets. No more words are needed because there's nothing more to describe. The Lord raised His hand; the hills appeared to wobble for a moment, and when the living regained their senses, the dead lay scattered like trash in the streets.
2. The Loss of Territory (ix. 8-21).—So awful a calamity, in which the dying did not die out of sight nor fall huddled together on some far off battle-field, but[51] the whole land was strewn with her slain, ought to have left indelible impression on the people. But it did not. The Lord's own word had been in it for Jacob and Israel (ix. 8), that the people might know, even Ephraim and the inhabitants of Samaria. But unhumbled they turned in the stoutness of their hearts, saying, when the earthquake had passed:[5] The bricks are fallen, but we will build with hewn stones;[6] the sycomores are cut down, but we will change them into cedars. Calamity did not make this people thoughtful; they felt God only to endeavour to forget Him. Therefore He visited them the second time. They did not feel the Lord shaking their land, so He sent their enemies to steal it from them: the Syrians before and the Philistines behind; and they devour Israel with open mouth. What that had been for appalling suddenness this was for lingering and harassing—guerilla warfare, armed raids, the land eaten away bit by bit. Yet the people do not return unto Him that smote them, neither seek they the Lord of hosts.
2. Territory Loss (ix. 8-21).—Such a terrible disaster, where the dying didn't just fade away out of sight or collapse in some distant battlefield, but[51] the entire land was covered with the dead, should have left a lasting mark on the people. But it didn't. The Lord’s own message had been given to Jacob and Israel (ix. 8), so that the people might understand, even Ephraim and the residents of Samaria. Yet, unrepentant, they turned in their stubbornness, saying, when the earthquake was over: [5] The bricks have fallen, but we will rebuild with cut stones; [6] the sycamores are chopped down, but we will replace them with cedars. Disaster didn’t prompt the people to reflect; they only tried to forget God. So He punished them a second time. They didn’t notice the Lord shaking their land, so He sent their enemies to take it away from them: the Syrians in front and the Philistines behind; and they are devouring Israel with open mouths. What had been a shocking quickness before was now a slow and tormenting—guerrilla warfare, armed attacks, the land being consumed piece by piece. Yet the people do not return to Him who struck them, nor do they seek the Lord of hosts.
3. War and Defeat (ix. 13-17).—The next consequent calamity passed from the land to the people themselves. A great battle is described, in which the nation is dismembered in one day. War and its horrors are told, and the apparent want of Divine pity and discrimination which they imply is explained. Israel has been led into these disasters by the folly of their leaders, whom Isaiah therefore singles out for blame. For they that lead these people cause them to err, and they that are led of them are destroyed. But the real horror[52] of war is that it falls not upon its authors, that its victims are not statesmen, but the beauty of a country's youth, the helplessness of the widow and orphan. Some question seems to have been stirred by this in Isaiah's heart. He asks, Why does the Lord not rejoice in the young men of His people? Why has He no pity for widow and orphan, that He thus sacrifices them to the sin of the rulers? It is because the whole nation shares the ruler's guilt; every one is an hypocrite and an evil-doer, and every mouth speaketh folly. As ruler so people, is a truth Isaiah frequently asserts, but never with such grimness as here. War brings out, as nothing else does, the solidarity of a people in guilt.
3. War and Defeat (ix. 13-17).—The next disaster affected not just the land but the people themselves. A significant battle is described, where the nation is torn apart in a single day. The horrors of war are detailed, alongside the apparent lack of Divine compassion and judgment that they suggest. Israel has been led into these calamities by the foolishness of their leaders, who Isaiah points out as deserving of blame. For those who lead these people misguide them, and those who follow them are destroyed. But the real horror[52] of war is that it does not strike its instigators; its victims are not the politicians but the youth of the country, along with the helpless widow and orphan. This seems to provoke a question in Isaiah's heart. He asks, Why doesn’t the Lord take joy in the young men of His people? Why does He show no compassion for widow and orphan, allowing them to be sacrificed to the sins of the rulers? It is because the entire nation shares the guilt of their leaders; everyone is a hypocrite and a wrongdoer, and every mouth spews nonsense. The truth that the leader reflects the people is something Isaiah often emphasizes, but never with such harshness as here. War reveals, more than anything else, the shared guilt of a people.
4. Internal Anarchy (ix. 18-21).—Even yet the people did not repent; their calamities only drove them to further wickedness. The prophet's eyes are opened to the awful fact that God's wrath is but the blast that fans men's hot sins to flame. This is one of those two or three awful scenes in history, in the conflagration of which we cannot tell what is human sin and what Divine judgement. There is a panic wickedness, sin spreading like mania, as if men were possessed by supernatural powers. The physical metaphors of the prophet are evident: a forest or prairie fire, and the consequent famine, whose fevered victims feed upon themselves. And no less evident are the political facts which the prophet employs these metaphors to describe. It is the anarchy which has beset more than one corrupt and unfortunate people, when their misleaders have been overthrown: the anarchy in which each faction seeks to slaughter out the rest. Jealousy and distrust awake the lust for blood, rage seizes the people as fire the forest, and no man spareth his[53] brother. We have had modern instances of all this; these scenes form a true description of some days of the French Revolution, and are even a truer description of the civil war that broke out in Paris after her late siege.
4. Internal Chaos (ix. 18-21).—Even now the people did not change their ways; their struggles only pushed them towards more evil. The prophet realizes the terrible truth that God's anger just stokes people's sinful desires to burn even hotter. This is one of those few horrific moments in history where it's hard to tell what's human sin and what's divine judgment. There's a chaotic wickedness, with sin spreading like a contagious disease, as if people were being controlled by supernatural forces. The prophet's physical metaphors are clear: a wildfire in the woods or on the plains, and the resulting famine, where desperate victims turn to cannibalism. The political realities the prophet uses these metaphors to illustrate are equally clear. It refers to the chaos that has struck more than one corrupt and unfortunate society when their corrupt leaders are ousted: the anarchy where each group tries to wipe out the others. Jealousy and suspicion ignite a thirst for blood, and rage grips the people just like fire engulfs a forest, and no man spareth his[53]brother. We have seen modern examples of all this; these events accurately describe some days of the French Revolution, and are even a more accurate reflection of the civil war that erupted in Paris after its recent siege.
Send swiftly to address these terrible wrongs,
It will come,
Humanity must inevitably rely on itself.
Like deep-sea monsters."[7]
5. The Threat of Captivity (x. 1-4).—Turning now from the past, and from the fate of Samaria, with which it would appear he has been more particularly engaged, the prophet addresses his own countrymen in Judah, and paints the future for them. It is not a future in which there is any hope. The day of their visitation also will surely come, and the prophet sees it close in the darkest night of which a Jewish heart could think—the night of captivity. Where, he asks his unjust countrymen—where will ye then flee for help? and where will you leave your glory? Cringing among the captives, lying dead beneath heaps of dead—that is to be your fate, who will have turned so often and then so finally from God. When exactly the prophet thus warned his countrymen of captivity we do not know, but the warning, though so real, produced neither penitence in men nor pity in God. For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still.
5. The Danger of Being Captured (x. 1-4).—Shifting focus from the past and the fate of Samaria, which he seems to have concentrated on, the prophet speaks to his fellow countrymen in Judah and describes their future. It's a future without hope. Their day of reckoning will undoubtedly arrive, and the prophet envisions it in the darkest night imaginable for a Jewish soul—the night of captivity. He asks his unjust countrymen—where will you then flee for help? and where will you leave your glory? Cowering among the captives, lying dead under piles of bodies—that's the fate awaiting those who have so frequently and finally turned away from God. We don’t know exactly when the prophet warned his countrymen about captivity, but the warning, although genuine, stirred neither repentance in people nor compassion in God. For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still.
6. The Assyrian Invasion (v. 26-30).—The prophet is, therefore, free to explain that cloud which has appeared far away on the northern horizon. God's hand of judgement is still uplifted over Judah, and it is that[54] hand which summons the cloud. The Assyrians are coming in answer to God's signal, and they are coming as a flood, to leave nothing but ruin and distress behind them. No description by Isaiah is more majestic than this one, in which Jehovah, who has exhausted every nearer means of converting His people, lifts His undrooping arm with a flag to the nations that are far off, and hisses or whistles for them from the end of the earth. And, behold, they come with speed, swiftly: there is no weary one nor straggler among them; none slumbers nor sleeps; nor loosed is the girdle of his loins, nor broken the latchet of his shoes; whose arrows are sharpened, and all their bows bent; their horses' hoofs are like the flint, and their wheels like the whirlwind; a roar have they like the lion's, and they roar like young lions; yea, they growl and grasp the prey, and carry it off, and there is none to deliver. And they growl upon him that day like the growling of the sea; and if one looks to the land, behold, dark and distress, and the light is darkened in the cloudy heaven.
6. The Assyrian Invasion (v. 26-30).—The prophet is, therefore, ready to explain the cloud that's appeared far off on the northern horizon. God's hand of judgment is still raised over Judah, and it is that [54] hand that calls in the cloud. The Assyrians are coming in response to God's signal, and they are approaching like a flood, leaving nothing but destruction and suffering in their wake. No description by Isaiah is more powerful than this one, where Jehovah, having tried every closer method to turn His people around, raises His unwavering arm with a flag to nations far away, and hisses or whistles for them from the ends of the earth. And, look, they come quickly, swiftly: there is no tired one or straggler among them; none sleeps or slumbers; their belts are not loose, and the straps of their sandals are not broken; their arrows are sharp, and all their bows are drawn; their horses' hooves are like flint, and their wheels are like a whirlwind; they roar like lions, and they growl like young lions; yes, they growl and seize the prey, carrying it off, with none to rescue. And they roar at him that day like the roar of the sea; and if one looks to the land, it's dark and distressed, and the light is dimmed in the cloudy sky.
Thus Isaiah leaves Judah to await her doom. But the tones of his weird refrain awaken in our hearts some thoughts which will not let his message go from us just yet.
Thus, Isaiah leaves Judah to wait for her fate. But the echoes of his strange refrain stir thoughts in our hearts that won’t let his message fade away just yet.
It will ever be a question, whether men abuse more their sorrows or their joys; but no earnest soul can doubt, which of these abuses is the more fatal. To sin in the one case is to yield to a temptation; to sin in the other is to resist a Divine grace. Sorrow is God's last message to man; it is God speaking in emphasis. He who abuses it shows that he can shut his ears when God speaks loudest. Therefore heartlessness or impenitence after sorrow is more dangerous than intemperance in joy; its results are always more tragic. Now Isaiah points out that men's abuse of sorrow is twofold. Men abuse[55] sorrow by mistaking it, and they abuse sorrow by defying it.
It will always be a question of whether people mismanage their sorrows or their joys more; however, no sincere person can doubt which of these mismanagements is more harmful. To sin in one case is to give in to temptation; to sin in the other is to resist a Divine grace. Sorrow is God's final message to humanity; it is God speaking with emphasis. Those who misuse it show that they can ignore God's loudest voice. Therefore, being heartless or unrepentant after experiencing sorrow is more dangerous than being excessive in joy; its outcomes are always more tragic. Now Isaiah highlights that people's misuse of sorrow is twofold. People mismanage sorrow by misunderstanding it, and they mismanage sorrow by defying it.
Men abuse sorrow by mistaking it, when they see in it nothing but a penal or expiatory force. To many men sorrow is what his devotions were to Louis XI., which having religiously performed, he felt the more brave to sin. So with the Samaritans, who said in the stoutness of their hearts, The bricks are fallen down, but we will build with hewn stones; the sycomores are cut down, but we will change them into cedars. To speak in this way is happy, but heathenish. It is to call sorrow "bad luck;" it is to hear no voice of God in it, saying, "Be pure; be humble; lean upon Me." This disposition springs from a vulgar conception of God, as of a Being of no permanence in character, easily irritated but relieved by a burst of passion, smartly punishing His people and then leaving them to themselves. It is a temper which says, "God is angry, let us wait a little; God is appeased, let us go ahead again." Over against such vulgar views of a Deity with a temper Isaiah unveils the awful majesty of God in holy wrath: For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still. How grim and savage does it appear to our eyes till we understand the thoughts of the sinners to whom it was revealed! God cannot dispel the cowardly thought, that He is anxious only to punish, except by letting His heavy hand abide till it purify also. The permanence of God's wrath is thus an ennobling, not a stupefying doctrine.
Men misuse sorrow by misunderstanding it, seeing it only as a punishment or a way to make up for mistakes. For many, sorrow is like the devotions of Louis XI, which, once completed, made him feel braver about sinning. The Samaritans had a similar mindset, boldly proclaiming, The bricks are fallen down, but we will build with hewn stones; the sycomores are cut down, but we will change them into cedars. Such statements are uplifting, but also misguided. It's like calling sorrow "bad luck;" it ignores the voice of God within it, saying, "Be pure; be humble; trust in Me." This attitude comes from a common, flawed view of God, depicted as a being with an unpredictable temperament—easily angered yet calmed by passion, quick to punish His people and then leaving them to fend for themselves. It's a mindset that suggests, "God is upset, let’s wait a bit; God is now satisfied, so we can move forward again." In contrast to such simplistic understandings of a temperamental Deity, Isaiah reveals the profound majesty of God's holy anger: For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still. It can seem harsh and brutal until we grasp the perspective of the sinners to whom it was shared. God can’t eliminate the fearful notion that He is only interested in punishing us unless He allows His heavy hand to remain until it also brings purification. Thus, the enduring nature of God's wrath is a dignifying, not dulling, teaching.
Men also abuse sorrow by defying it, but the end of this is madness. "It forms the greater part of the tragedy of King Lear, that the aged monarch, though he has given his throne away, retains his imperiousness of heart, and continues to exhibit a senseless, if sometimes[56] picturesque, pride and selfishness in face of misfortune. Even when he is overthrown he must still command; he fights against the very elements; he is determined to be at least the master of his own sufferings and destiny. But for this the necessary powers fail him; his life thus disordered terminates in madness. It was only by such an affliction that a character like his could be brought to repentance, ... to humility, which is the parent of true love, and that love in him could be purified. Hence the melancholy close of that tragedy."[8] As Shakespeare has dealt with the king, so Isaiah with the people; he also shows us sorrow when it is defied bringing forth madness. On so impious a height man's brain grows dizzy, and he falls into that terrible abyss which is not, as some imagine, hell, but God's last purgatory. Shakespeare brings shattered Lear out of it, and Isaiah has a remnant of the people to save.
Men also misuse sorrow by resisting it, but this ultimately leads to madness. "A major part of the tragedy of King Lear is that the old king, despite having given up his throne, clings to his arrogance and continues to show a senseless, though sometimes[56] striking, pride and selfishness in the face of adversity. Even when he's brought down, he still needs to be in control; he battles against nature itself; he is determined to be at least the master of his own pain and fate. But for this, his necessary strengths fail him; his disordered life ends in madness. It was only through such suffering that a character like his could come to repentance, ... to humility, which is the source of true love, allowing that love within him to be purified. Hence the sad conclusion of that tragedy."[8] Just as Shakespeare has portrayed the king, Isaiah addresses the people; he also illustrates how defying sorrow leads to madness. On such a blasphemous peak, a person's mind becomes dizzy, and they fall into that dreadful void which is not, as some might believe, hell, but God's ultimate purgatory. Shakespeare pulls shattered Lear out of it, and Isaiah has a remnant of the people to save.
CHAPTER IV.
ISAIAH'S CALL AND CONSECRATION.
Isaiah vi. (740 B.C.; WRITTEN 735? OR 725?).
Isaiah 6. (740 B.C.; WRITTEN 735? OR 725?).
It has been already remarked that in chapter vi. we should find no other truths than those which have been unfolded in chapters ii.-v.: the Lord exalted in righteousness, the coming of a terrible judgement from Him upon Judah, and the survival of a bare remnant of the people. But chapter vi. treats the same subjects with a difference. In chapters ii.-iv. they gradually appear and grow to clearness in connection with the circumstances of Judah's history; in chapter v. they are formally and rhetorically vindicated; in chapter vi. we are led back to the secret and solemn moments of their first inspiration in the prophet's own soul. It may be asked why chapter vi. comes last and not first in this series, and why in an exposition, attempting to deal, as far as possible, chronologically with Isaiah's prophecies, his call should not form the subject of the first chapter. The answer is simple, and throws a flood of light upon the chapter. In all probability chapter vi. was written after its predecessors, and what Isaiah has put into it is not only what happened in the earliest moments of his prophetic life, but that spelt out and emphasized by his experience since. The ideal character of the narrative,[58] and its date some years after the events which it relates, are now generally admitted. Of course the narrative is all fact. No one will believe that he, whose glance penetrated with such keenness the character of men and movements, looked with dimmer eye into his own heart. It is the spiritual process which the prophet actually passed through before the opening of his ministry. But it is that, developed by subsequent experience, and presented to us in the language of outward vision. Isaiah had been some years a prophet, long enough to make clear that prophecy was not to be for him what it had been for his predecessors in Israel, a series of detached inspirations and occasional missions, with short responsibilities, but a work for life, a profession and a career, with all that this means of postponement, failure, and fluctuation of popular feeling. Success had not come so rapidly as the prophet in his original enthusiasm had looked for, and his preaching had effected little upon the people. Therefore he would go back to the beginning, remind himself of that to which God had really called him, and vindicate the results of his ministry, at which people scoffed and his own heart grew sometimes sick. In chapter vi. Isaiah acts as his own remembrancer. If we keep in mind, that this chapter, describing Isaiah's call and consecration to the prophetic office, was written by a man who felt that office to be the burden of a lifetime, and who had to explain its nature and vindicate its results to his own soul—grown somewhat uncertain, it may be, of her original inspiration—we shall find light upon features of the chapter that are otherwise most obscure.
It has already been noted that in chapter vi, we will find no other truths than those outlined in chapters ii-v: the Lord exalted in righteousness, the coming of a terrible judgment from Him upon Judah, and the survival of a small remnant of the people. However, chapter vi addresses these topics differently. In chapters ii-iv, they gradually come to light in connection with Judah's history; in chapter v, they are formally and rhetorically defended; in chapter vi, we return to the deep and solemn moments of their initial inspiration in the prophet's own soul. One might wonder why chapter vi appears last instead of first in this series, and why, in a discussion that tries to follow a chronological order with Isaiah's prophecies, his calling is not the focus of the first chapter. The answer is straightforward and sheds light on the chapter. It's likely that chapter vi was written after the earlier chapters, and what Isaiah presents here is not just what occurred in the earliest moments of his prophetic life, but what has been deepened and emphasized by his experiences since then. The ideal nature of the narrative, along with its date some years after the events it describes, is now widely accepted. Of course, the narrative is all factual. No one would believe that he, whose insight into the character of people and movements was so sharp, had a less clear view of his own heart. It reflects the spiritual journey the prophet actually went through before starting his ministry. But it is that journey, expanded by later experiences, and portrayed in the language of outward vision. Isaiah had been a prophet for several years, long enough to clarify that prophecy would not be for him what it had been for his predecessors in Israel—a series of isolated inspirations and occasional missions with brief responsibilities, but rather a lifelong work, a profession and a career, involving delays, failures, and fluctuations in public opinion. Success had not come as quickly as the prophet had initially hoped, and his preaching had little effect on the people. Therefore, he sought to return to the beginning, remind himself of what God had truly called him to, and reaffirm the results of his ministry, at which people scoffed and his own heart sometimes faltered. In chapter vi, Isaiah serves as his own reminder. If we remember that this chapter, detailing Isaiah's calling and consecration to the prophetic role, was written by a man who felt that role to be a lifelong burden and who had to clarify its nature and validate its results to his own possibly uncertain soul, we will gain insight into aspects of the chapter that might otherwise seem quite obscure.
1. The Vision (vv. 1-4).
The Vision (vv. 1-4).
Several years, then, Isaiah looks back and says, [59]In the year King Uzziah died. There is more than a date given here; there is a great contrast suggested. Prophecy does not chronicle by time, but by experiences, and we have here, as it seems, the cardinal experience of a prophet's life.
Several years later, Isaiah reflects and says, [59]In the year King Uzziah died. This isn’t just a date; it suggests a significant contrast. Prophecy isn’t recorded chronologically, but through experiences, and here we have what appears to be the pivotal experience of a prophet's life.
All men knew of that glorious reign with the ghastly end—fifty years of royalty, and then a lazar-house. There had been no king like this one since Solomon; never, since the son of David brought the Queen of Sheba to his feet, had the national pride stood so high or the nation's dream of sovereignty touched such remote borders. The people's admiration invested Uzziah with all the graces of the ideal monarch. The chronicler of Judah tells us that God helped him and made him to prosper, and his name spread far abroad, and he was marvellously helped till he was strong; he with the double name—Azariah, Jehovah-his-Helper; Uzziah, Jehovah-his-Strength. How this glory fell upon the fancy of the future prophet, and dyed it deep, we may imagine from those marvellous colours, with which in later years he painted the king in his beauty. Think of the boy, the boy that was to be an Isaiah, the boy with the germs of this great prophecy in his heart—think of him and such a hero as this to shine upon him, and we may conceive how his whole nature opened out beneath that sun of royalty and absorbed its light.
All people were aware of that glorious reign with its horrifying end—fifty years of royalty, followed by a leper colony. There hadn't been a king like him since Solomon; never before, since the son of David brought the Queen of Sheba to his feet, had the national pride soared so high or the nation's dreams of power reached such distant borders. The people's admiration gave Uzziah all the qualities of the ideal monarch. The chronicler of Judah tells us that God helped him and made him prosper, and his name spread widely, and he was wonderfully supported until he became strong; he with the dual name—Azariah, Jehovah-his-Helper; Uzziah, Jehovah-his-Strength. We can imagine how this glory impacted the future prophet's imagination and colored it deeply, based on the incredible imagery he later used to portray the king in his grandeur. Picture the boy, the one who would become Isaiah, the boy carrying the seeds of this great prophecy within him—imagine him with a hero like this shining on him, and we can understand how his entire being blossomed under that royal sun and absorbed its brilliance.
Suddenly the glory was eclipsed, and Jerusalem learned that she had seen her king for the last time: The Lord smote the king so that he was a leper unto the day of his death, and dwelt in a several house, and he was cut off from the house of the Lord. Uzziah had gone into the temple, and attempted with his own hands to burn incense. Under a later dispensation of liberty he would have been applauded as a[60] brave Protestant, vindicating the right of every worshipper of God to approach Him without the intervention of a special priesthood. Under the earlier dispensation of law his act could be regarded only as one of presumption, the expression of a worldly and irreverent temper, which ignored the infinite distance between God and man. It was followed, as sins of wilfulness in religion were always followed under the old covenant, by swift disaster. Uzziah suffered as Saul, Uzzah, Nadab and Abihu did. The wrath, with which he burst out on the opposing priests, brought on, or made evident as it is believed to have done in other cases, an attack of leprosy. The white spot stood out unmistakeably from the flushed forehead, and he was thrust from the temple—yea, himself also hasted to go out.
Suddenly, the glory faded, and Jerusalem realized she had seen her king for the last time: The Lord struck the king so that he became a leper until the day he died, living in a separate house, and he was cut off from the house of the Lord. Uzziah had entered the temple and tried to burn incense with his own hands. In a later era of freedom, he would have been praised as a[60] brave Protestant, championing the right of every worshiper of God to approach Him without needing a special priesthood. However, under the earlier system of law, his actions could only be seen as presumptuous, reflecting a worldly and irreverent attitude that ignored the vast gap between God and humanity. As was common with acts of intentional wrongdoing in religion under the old covenant, this was swiftly followed by disaster. Uzziah suffered just like Saul, Uzzah, Nadab, and Abihu. The anger he displayed toward the opposing priests resulted in what many believe was an outbreak of leprosy. A white spot distinctly appeared on his flushed forehead, and he was forced out of the temple—indeed, he hastened to leave.
We can imagine how such a judgement, the moral of which must have been plain to all, affected the most sensitive heart in Jerusalem. Isaiah's imagination was darkened, but he tells us that the crisis was the enfranchisement of his faith. In the year King Uzziah died—it is as if a veil had dropped, and the prophet saw beyond what it had hidden, the Lord sitting on a throne high and lifted up. That it is no mere date Isaiah means, but a spiritual contrast which he is anxious to impress upon us, is made clear by his emphasis of the rank and not the name of God. It is the Lord sitting upon a throne—the Lord absolutely, set over against the human prince. The simple antithesis seems to speak of the passing away of the young man's hero-worship and the dawn of his faith; and so interpreted, this first verse of chapter vi. is only a concise summary of that development of religious experience which we have traced through chapters ii.-iv. Had Isaiah ever been subject to the religious temper of his time, the[61] careless optimism of a prosperous and proud people, who entered upon their religious services without awe, trampling the courts of the Lord, and used them like Uzziah, for their own honour, who felt religion to be an easy thing, and dismissed from it all thoughts of judgement and feelings of penitence—if ever Isaiah had been subject to that temper, then once for all he was redeemed by this stroke upon Uzziah. And, as we have seen, there is every reason to believe that Isaiah did at first share the too easy public religion of his youth. That early vision of his (ii. 2-5), the establishment of Israel at the head of the nations, to be immediately attained at his own word (v. 5) and without preliminary purification, was it not simply a less gross form of the king's own religious presumption? Uzziah's fatal act was the expression of the besetting sin of his people, and in that sin Isaiah himself had been a partaker. I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips. In the person of their monarch the temper of the whole Jewish nation had come to judgement. Seeking the ends of religion by his own way, and ignoring the way God had appointed, Uzziah at the very moment of his insistence was hurled back and stamped unclean. The prophet's eyes were opened. The king sank into a leper's grave, but before Isaiah's vision the Divine majesty arose in all its loftiness. I saw the Lord high and lifted up. We already know what Isaiah means by these terms. He has used them of God's supremacy in righteousness above the low moral standards of men, of God's occupation of a far higher throne than that of the national deity of Judah, of God's infinite superiority to Israel's vulgar identification of His purposes with her material prosperity or His honour with the compromises[62] of her politics, and especially of God's seat as their Judge over a people, who sought in their religion only satisfaction for their pride and love of ease.
We can picture how such a judgment, whose moral was clear to everyone, affected the most sensitive heart in Jerusalem. Isaiah's imagination was clouded, but he tells us that the crisis was the liberation of his faith. In the year King Uzziah died—it's like a veil dropped, and the prophet saw beyond what it had concealed, the Lord sitting on a throne high and lifted up. This isn’t just a date Isaiah refers to; it’s a spiritual contrast he wants to emphasize, highlighted by his focus on the rank and not the name of God. It is the Lord sitting upon a throne—the Lord absolutely, set against the human prince. This simple contrast suggests the end of the young man's hero-worship and the beginning of his faith; interpreted this way, this first verse of chapter vi. succinctly summarizes the development of religious experience we’ve traced through chapters ii.-iv. If Isaiah had ever been influenced by the religious attitude of his time, the [61] careless optimism of a prosperous and proud people who approached their religious services without awe, trampling the courts of the Lord and using them like Uzziah for their own honor, who found religion to be an easy affair and dismissed all thoughts of judgment and feelings of repentance—if Isaiah ever shared that attitude, he was redeemed by Uzziah's downfall. And as we’ve seen, there’s every reason to believe that Isaiah initially embraced the overly simplistic public religion of his youth. That early vision of his (ii. 2-5), the establishment of Israel at the forefront of the nations, to be immediately realized at his command (v. 5) and without any need for prior purification, wasn’t it just a more subtle version of the king's own religious arrogance? Uzziah's disastrous act was the embodiment of the inherent sin of his people, and Isaiah had been part of that sin. I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips. Through their king, the mood of all the Jewish people faced judgment. Pursuing the goals of religion in his own way and ignoring the path God had designed, Uzziah, at the very moment of his insistence, was cast back and found unclean. The prophet's eyes were opened. The king fell into a leper’s grave, but before Isaiah’s vision, the Divine majesty rose in all its grandeur. I saw the Lord high and lifted up. We already know what Isaiah means by these terms. He has described God's supremacy in righteousness above the low moral standards of humans, God occupying a far higher throne than that of Judah’s national deity, God’s infinite superiority to Israel’s crude identification of His purposes with her material success or His honor with her political compromises, and especially God’s position as their Judge over a people who sought in their religion only satisfaction for their pride and love of comfort.
From this contrast the whole vision expands as follows.
From this contrast, the entire vision unfolds as follows.
Under the mistaken idea that what Isaiah describes is the temple in Jerusalem, it has been remarked, that the place of his vision is wonderful in the case of one who set so little store by ceremonial worship. This, however, to which our prophet looks is no house built with hands, but Jehovah's own heavenly palace (ver. 1—not temple); only Isaiah describes it in terms of the Jerusalem temple which was its symbol. It was natural that the temple should furnish Isaiah not only with the framework of his vision, but also with the platform from which he saw it. For it was in the temple that Uzziah's sin was sinned and God's holiness vindicated upon him. It was in the temple that, when Isaiah beheld the scrupulous religiousness of the people, the contrast of that with their evil lives struck him, and he summed it up in the epigram wickedness and worship (i. 13). It was in the temple, in short, that the prophet's conscience had been most roused, and just where the conscience is most roused there is the vision of God to be expected. Very probably it was while brooding over Uzziah's judgement on the scene of its occurrence that Isaiah beheld his vision. Yet for all the vision contained the temple itself was too narrow. The truth which was to be revealed to Isaiah, the holiness of God, demanded a wider stage and the breaking down of those partitions, which, while they had been designed to impress God's presence on the worshipper, had only succeeded in veiling Him. So while the seer keeps his station on the threshold of the earthly[63] building, soon to feel it rock beneath his feet, as heaven's praise bursts like thunder on the earth, and while his immediate neighbourhood remains the same familiar house, all beyond is glorified. The veil of the temple falls away, and everything behind it. No ark nor mercy-seat is visible, but a throne and a court—the palace of God in heaven, as we have it also pictured in the eleventh and twenty-ninth Psalms. The Royal Presence is everywhere. Isaiah describes no face, only a Presence and a Session: the Lord sitting on a throne, and His skirts filled the palace.
Under the false impression that Isaiah is referring to the temple in Jerusalem, it has been noted that the location of his vision is remarkable for someone who valued ceremonial worship so little. However, what our prophet is actually envisioning is not a man-made structure, but Jehovah's own heavenly palace (ver. 1—not temple); Isaiah describes it using terms from the Jerusalem temple, which symbolized it. It makes sense that the temple would provide Isaiah not only with the framework for his vision but also with the place from which he witnessed it. After all, it was in the temple that Uzziah's sin took place and God's holiness was demonstrated against him. It was in the temple that, when Isaiah observed the meticulous religiousness of the people, the stark contrast with their sinful lives struck him, and he summed it up in the saying wickedness and worship (i. 13). Essentially, it was in the temple where the prophet's conscience was most stirred, and wherever one's conscience is most awakened, a vision of God can be expected. It’s likely that while reflecting on Uzziah’s judgement at the site of its occurrence, Isaiah experienced his vision. Yet despite the vision, the temple was too limited. The truth to be revealed to Isaiah, the holiness of God, required a broader stage and the removal of the barriers that, while meant to emphasize God’s presence to the worshipper, ended up obscuring Him. So as the seer remains at the threshold of the earthly[63] building, he soon feels it tremble beneath him as the praise of heaven crashes down like thunder onto the earth, while his immediate surroundings stay the same familiar house, everything beyond is transformed in glory. The veil of the temple falls away, along with everything behind it. There’s no ark or mercy-seat visible, just a throne and a court—the palace of God in heaven, as depicted in the eleventh and twenty-ninth Psalms. The Royal Presence is everywhere. Isaiah describes no face, only a Presence and a Session: the Lord sitting on a throne, and His skirts filled the palace.
Around (not above, as in the English version) were ranged the hovering courtiers, of what shape and appearance we know not, except that they veiled their faces and their feet before the awful Holiness,—all wings and voice, perfect readinesses of praise and service. The prophet heard them chant in antiphon, like the temple choirs of priests. And the one choir cried out, Holy, holy, holy is Jehovah of hosts; and the other responded, The whole earth is full of His glory.
Surrounding (not above, like the English version) were the hovering courtiers, whose shape and appearance we don’t know, except that they covered their faces and feet before the mighty Holiness,—all wings and voices, perfectly ready to praise and serve. The prophet heard them chanting in response, like the temple choirs of priests. And one choir called out, Holy, holy, holy is Jehovah of hosts; and the other replied, The whole earth is full of His glory.
It is by the familiar name Jehovah of hosts—the proper name of Israel's national God—that the prophet hears the choirs of heaven address the Divine Presence. But what they ascribe to the Deity is exactly what Israel will not ascribe, and the revelation they make of His nature is the contradiction of Israel's thoughts concerning Him.
It is by the familiar name Jehovah of hosts—the official name of Israel's national God—that the prophet hears the choirs of heaven speak to the Divine Presence. However, what they attribute to the Deity is exactly what Israel does not acknowledge, and the revelation they provide of His nature contradicts Israel's beliefs about Him.
What, in the first place, is HOLINESS? We attach this term to a definite standard of morality or an unusually[64] impressive fulness of character. To our minds it is associated with very positive forces, as of comfort and conviction—perhaps because we take our ideas of it from the active operations of the Holy Ghost. The original force of the term holiness, however, was not positive but negative, and throughout the Old Testament, whatever modifications its meaning undergoes, it retains a negative flavour. The Hebrew word for holiness springs from a root which means to set apart, make distinct, put at a distance from. When God is described as the Holy One in the Old Testament it is generally with the purpose of withdrawing Him from some presumption of men upon His majesty or of negativing their unworthy thoughts of Him. The Holy One is the Incomparable: To whom, then, will ye liken Me, that I should be equal to him? saith the Holy One (xl. 25). He is the Unapproachable: Who is able to stand before Jehovah, this holy God? (1 Sam. vi. 20). He is the Utter Contrast of man: I am God, and not man, the Holy One in the midst of thee (Hosea xi. 9). He is the Exalted and Sublime: Thus saith the high and lofty One that inhabiteth eternity, whose name is Holy: I dwell in the high and holy place (lvii. 15). Generally speaking, then, holiness is equivalent to separateness, sublimity—in fact, just to that loftiness or exaltation which Isaiah has already so often reiterated as the principal attribute of God. In their thrice-repeated Holy the seraphs are only telling more emphatically to the prophet's ears what his eyes have already seen, the Lord high and lifted up. Better expression could not be found for the full idea of Godhead. This little word Holy radiates heaven's own breadth of meaning. Within its fundamental idea—distance or difference from man—what spaces are there[65] not for every attribute of Godhead to flash? If the Holy One be originally He who is distinct from man and man's thoughts, and who impresses man from the beginning with the awful sublimity of the contrast in which He stands to him, how naturally may holiness come to cover not only that moral purity and intolerance of sin to which we now more strictly apply the term, but those metaphysical conceptions as well, which we gather up under the name "supernatural," and so finally, by lifting the Divine nature away from the change and vanity of this world, and emphasizing God's independence of all beside Himself, become the fittest expression we have for Him as the Infinite and Self-existent. Thus the word holy appeals in turn to each of the three great faculties of man's nature, by which he can be religiously exercised—his conscience, his affections, his reason; it covers the impressions which God makes on man as a sinner, on man as a worshipper, on man as a thinker. The Holy One is not only the Sinless and Sin-abhorring, but the Sublime and the Absolute too.
What, first of all, is Sacredness? We associate this term with a specific standard of morality or an unusually [64] impressive fullness of character. We see it tied to very positive forces, like comfort and conviction—perhaps because our understanding of it comes from the active workings of the Holy Ghost. However, the original meaning of the term holiness was not positive but negative, and throughout the Old Testament, no matter how its meaning changes, it keeps a negative tone. The Hebrew word for holiness comes from a root that means to set apart, make distinct, put at a distance from. When God is described as the Holy One in the Old Testament, it’s usually to emphasize His separation from human arrogance concerning His majesty or to negate our unworthy ideas about Him. The Holy One is the Incomparable: To whom, then, will you compare Me, that I should be equal to Him? says the Holy One (xl. 25). He is the Unapproachable: Who is able to stand before Jehovah, this holy God? (1 Sam. vi. 20). He is the Utter Contrast to man: I am God, and not man, the Holy One in the midst of you (Hosea xi. 9). He is the Exalted and Sublime: Thus says the high and lofty One who inhabits eternity, whose name is Holy: I dwell in the high and holy place (lvii. 15). Generally, then, holiness equals separateness, sublimity—in fact, just that loftiness or exaltation that Isaiah has repeatedly highlighted as God's main attribute. In their thrice-repeated Holy, the seraphs are emphasizing to the prophet what his eyes have already witnessed, the Lord high and lifted up. There couldn’t be a better expression for the complete idea of Godhead. This small word Holy radiates heaven's own range of meaning. Within its core idea—distance or difference from man—what vast spaces are there [65] not for every attribute of Godhead to shine? If the Holy One is originally He who is distinct from man and his thoughts, and who from the start impresses man with the overwhelming grandeur of the contrast He presents, how naturally does holiness come to encompass not only that moral purity and intolerance of sin that we more strictly apply to the term today, but also those metaphysical concepts we group under the name "supernatural," and thus finally, by lifting the Divine nature away from the change and vanity of this world, and emphasizing God's independence from everything else, become our best expression for Him as the Infinite and Self-existent. So, the word holy appeals to each of the three great faculties of human nature through which we can engage with the divine—our conscience, our affections, our reason; it encompasses the impressions God makes on man as a sinner, as a worshipper, and as a thinker. The Holy One is not just the Sinless and Sin-hating, but also the Sublime and the Absolute.
But while we recognize the exhaustiveness of the series of ideas about the Divine Nature, which develop from the root meaning of holiness, and to express which the word holy is variously used throughout the Scriptures, we must not, if we are to appreciate the use of the word on this occasion, miss the motive of recoil which starts them all. If we would hear what Isaiah heard in the seraphs' song, we must distinguish in the three-fold ascription of holiness the intensity of recoil from the confused religious views and low moral temper of the prophet's generation. It is no scholastic definition of Deity which the seraphim are giving. Not for a moment is it to be supposed that to that[66] age, whose representative is listening to them, they are attempting to convey an idea of the Trinity. Their thrice-uttered Holy is not theological accuracy, but religious emphasis. This angelic revelation of the holiness of God was intended for a generation, some of whom were idol-worshippers, confounding the Godhead with the work of their own hands or with natural objects, and none of whom were free from a confusion in principle of the Divine with the human and worldly, for which now sheer mental slovenliness, now a dull moral sense, and now positive pride was to blame. To worshippers who trampled the courts of the Lord with the careless feet, and looked up the temple with the unabashed faces, of routine, the cry of the seraphs, as they veiled their faces and their feet, travailed to restore that shuddering sense of the sublimity of the Divine Presence, which in the impressible youth of the race first impelled man, bowing low beneath the awful heavens, to name God by the name of the Holy. To men, again, careful of the legal forms of worship, but lawless and careless in their lives, the song of the seraphs revealed not the hard truth, against which they had already rubbed conscience trite, that God's law was inexorable, but the fiery fact that His whole nature burned with wrath towards sin. To men, once more, proud of their prestige and material prosperity, and presuming in their pride to take their own way with God, and to employ like Uzziah the exercises of religion for their own honour, this vision presented the real sovereignty of God: the Lord Himself seated on a throne there—just where they felt only a theatre for the display of their pride, or machinery for the attainment of their private ends. Thus did the three-fold cry of the[67] angels meet the three-fold sinfulness of that generation of men.
But while we understand the comprehensive range of ideas about the Divine Nature that stem from the core meaning of holiness, and which the word holy is used to express throughout the Scriptures, we must not overlook the underlying motive that prompts them all if we want to appreciate how the word is used in this context. To grasp what Isaiah heard in the seraphs' song, we need to recognize the intensity of rejection it conveys against the confused religious beliefs and low moral standards of the prophet's time. The seraphim aren’t providing a complex definition of Deity. For a second, we shouldn't think that they are trying to express the idea of the Trinity to the age represented by the listener. Their triple repetition of Holy isn't about theological precision, but rather about religious emphasis. This angelic revelation of God's holiness was meant for a generation that included idolaters, who confused the Divine with the things they made or natural objects, and none of whom were free from mixing the Divine with the human and worldly aspects, driven by mental laziness, a dull moral sense, or outright pride. To worshipers who trampled the courts of the Lord with their careless steps and approached the temple with unworried faces, the cry of the seraphs—who veiled their faces and feet—sought to restore that intense awareness of the majesty of the Divine Presence, which in the vulnerable youth of humanity first drove people to bow low beneath the vast heavens and call God the Holy. To those focused on the legalities of worship but lawless and indifferent in their lives, the seraphs' song revealed not the harsh truth they had grown accustomed to resisting, that God's law was unyielding, but the fiery reality that His entire nature burned with anger towards sin. To those once again, proud of their status and material wealth, and presumptuously thinking they could shape their own relationship with God and use religious practices for their own honor, this vision showcased God's true sovereignty: the Lord Himself seated on a throne there—exactly where they saw only a stage for showcasing their pride or a tool to achieve their personal goals. In this way, the three-fold cry of the[67] angels addressed the three-fold failings of that generation.
But the first line of the seraph's song serves more than a temporary end. The Trisagion rings, and has need to ring, for ever down the Church. Everywhere and at all times these are the three besetting sins of religious people—callousness in worship, carelessness in life, and the temper which employs the forms of religion simply for self-indulgence or self-aggrandisement. These sins are induced by the same habit of contentment with mere form; they can be corrected only by the vision of the Personal Presence who is behind all form. Our organization, ritual, law and sacrament—we must be able to see them fall away, as Isaiah saw the sanctuary itself disappear, before God Himself, if we are to remain heartily moral and fervently religious. The Church of God has to learn that no mere multiplication of forms, nor a more æsthetic arrangement of them, will redeem her worshippers from callousness. Callousness is but the shell which the feelings develop in self-defence when left by the sluggish and impenetrative soul to beat upon the hard outsides of form. And nothing will fuse this shell of callousness but that ardent flame, which is kindled at the touching of the Divine and human spirits, when forms have fallen away and the soul beholds with open face the Eternal Himself. As with worship, so with morality. Holiness is secured not by ceremonial, but by a reverence for a holy Being. We shall rub our consciences trite against moral maxims or religious rites. It is the effluence of a Presence, which alone can create in us, and keep in us, a clean heart. And if any object that we thus make light of ritual and religious law, of Church and sacrament, the reply is[68] obvious. Ritual and sacrament are to the living God but as the wick of a candle to the light thereof. They are given to reveal Him, and the process is not perfect unless they themselves perish from the thoughts to which they convey Him. If God is not felt to be present, as Isaiah felt Him to be, to the exclusion of all forms, then these will be certain to be employed, as Uzziah employed them, for the sake of the only other spiritual being of whom the worshipper is conscious—himself. Unless we are able to forget our ritual in spiritual communion with the very God, and to become unconscious of our organization in devout consciousness of our personal relation to Him, then ritual will be only a means of sensuous indulgence, organization only a machinery for selfish or sectarian ends. The vision of God—this is the one thing needful for worship and for conduct.
But the first line of the seraph's song is more than just a momentary pause. The Trisagion resonates, and it needs to resonate, throughout the Church forever. At all times and everywhere, these are the three persistent sins of religious individuals—indifference in worship, neglect in life, and a mindset that uses religious practices merely for personal pleasure or self-promotion. These sins arise from a complacency with mere rituals; they can only be corrected by recognizing the Personal Presence behind all rituals. Our organization, rituals, laws, and sacraments must be able to fade away, just as Isaiah saw the sanctuary itself vanish before God, if we are to remain genuinely moral and deeply religious. The Church must understand that simply increasing rituals, or arranging them more aesthetically, won't save its worshippers from indifference. Indifference is just a protective shell that feelings form when a sluggish and unresponsive soul is left to bang against the hard surfaces of rituals. Nothing will melt this shell of indifference but the passionate flame ignited by the encounter of the Divine and human spirits, when rituals have faded away and the soul sees the Eternal face to face. Just as it is with worship, so it is with morality. Holiness isn’t achieved through ceremonies, but through a deep respect for a holy Being. We can grind our consciences against moral principles or religious practices, but it is the influence of a Presence that alone can create and maintain a pure heart within us. If anyone argues that we are disregarding rituals and religious laws, the answer is clear. Rituals and sacraments are to the living God what the wick is to the light of a candle. They exist to reveal Him, and the process isn't complete unless they fade from our thoughts as they guide us to Him. If God is not felt to be present, as Isaiah sensed Him, to the exclusion of all forms, then those forms will likely be used, just as Uzziah used them, for the sake of the only other spiritual being the worshipper is aware of—himself. Unless we can forget our rituals in spiritual communion with God and become unaware of our organization while being deeply conscious of our personal relationship with Him, then rituals will just be a tool for sensory pleasure, and organization will only serve selfish or sectarian purposes. The vision of God—this is the one essential requirement for worship and for living rightly.
But while the one verse of the antiphon reiterates what Jehovah of hosts is in Himself, the other describes what He is in revelation. The whole earth is full of His glory. Glory is the correlative of holiness. Glory is that in which holiness comes to expression. Glory is the expression of holiness, as beauty is the expression of health. If holiness be as deep as we have seen, so varied then will glory be. There is nothing in the earth but it is the glory of God. The fulness of the whole earth is His glory, is the proper grammatical rendering of the song. For Jehovah of hosts is not the God only of Israel, but the Maker of heaven and earth, and not the victory of Israel alone, but the wealth and the beauty of all the world is His glory. So universal an ascription of glory is the proper parallel to that of absolute Godhead, which is implied in holiness.
But while one verse of the antiphon repeats who Jehovah of hosts is in Himself, the other describes who He is in revelation. The whole earth is full of His glory. Glory is linked to holiness. Glory is how holiness expresses itself. Glory reflects holiness, just as beauty reflects health. If holiness is as profound as we've observed, then glory will be equally diverse. Everything on earth reflects the glory of God. The fullness of the whole earth is His glory is the correct grammatical interpretation of the song. For Jehovah of hosts is not just the God of Israel, but the Creator of heaven and earth; His glory encompasses not only Israel’s victories but the richness and beauty of the entire world. Such a universal acknowledgment of glory aligns perfectly with the concept of absolute Godhood implied in holiness.
[69]II. The Call (vv. 4-8).
II. The Call (vv. 4-8).
Thus, then, Isaiah, standing on earth, on the place of a great sin, with the conscience of his people's evil in his heart, and himself not without the feeling of guilt, looked into heaven, and beholding the glory of God, heard also with what pure praise and readiness of service the heavenly hosts surround His throne. No wonder the prophet felt the polluted threshold rock beneath him, or that as where fire and water mingle there should be the rising of a great smoke. For the smoke described is not, as some have imagined, that of acceptable incense, thick billows swelling through the temple to express the completion and satisfaction of the seraphs' worship; but it is the mist which ever arises where holiness and sin touch each other. It has been described both as the obscurity that envelops a weak mind in presence of a truth too great for it, and the darkness that falls upon a diseased eye when exposed to the mid-day sun. These are only analogies, and may mislead us. What Isaiah actually felt was the dim-eyed shame, the distraction, the embarrassment, the blinding shock of a personal encounter with One whom he was utterly unfit to meet. For this was a personal encounter. We have spelt out the revelation sentence by sentence in gradual argument; but Isaiah did not reach it through argument or brooding. It was not to the prophet what it is to his expositors, a pregnant thought, that his intellect might gradually unfold, but a Personal Presence, which apprehended and overwhelmed him. God and he were there face to face. Then said I, Woe is me, for I am undone, because a man unclean of lips am I, and in the midst of a people unclean of lips do I dwell; for the King, Jehovah of hosts, mine eyes have beheld.
Thus, Isaiah, standing on the earth, in a place of great sin, with the awareness of his people's wrongdoing in his heart, and feeling a sense of guilt himself, looked up to heaven. He saw the glory of God and heard how the heavenly hosts surrounded His throne with pure praise and a willingness to serve. It’s no surprise that the prophet felt the tainted ground shake beneath him, or that where fire and water mix, there should be a rising smoke. The smoke described is not, as some have thought, the pleasant incense billowing through the temple, representing the fulfillment and satisfaction of the seraphs' worship; rather, it is the mist that always arises where holiness and sin meet. This has been depicted as the confusion that envelops a weak mind confronted with a truth too vast for it, and the darkness that falls upon an impaired eye when exposed to the midday sun. These are merely analogies and can be misleading. What Isaiah truly felt was a deep shame, distraction, embarrassment, and the shocking realization of encountering Someone he was completely unworthy to meet. This was a personal encounter. We have broken down the revelation point by point in a gradual argument; but Isaiah did not come to it through reasoning or contemplation. For him, it wasn’t a significant thought for his intellect to unfold, but a Personal Presence that seized and overwhelmed him. God and he were there face to face. Then said I, Woe is me, for I am undone, because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for the King, the Lord of hosts, my eyes have seen.
[70]The form of the prophet's confession, uncleanness of lips, will not surprise us as far as he makes it for himself. As with the disease of the body, so with the sin of the soul; each often gathers to one point of pain. Every man, though wholly sinful by nature, has his own particular consciousness of guilt. Isaiah being a prophet felt his mortal weakness most upon his lips. The inclusion of the people, however, along with himself under this form of guilt, suggests a wider interpretation of it. The lips are, as it were, the blossom of a man. Grace is poured upon thy lips, therefore God hath blessed thee for ever. If any man offend not in word, the same is a perfect man, able to bridle the whole body also. It is in the blossom of a plant that the plant's defects become conspicuous; it is when all a man's faculties combine for the complex and delicate office of expression that any fault which is in him will come to the surface. Isaiah had been listening to the perfect praise of sinless beings, and it brought into startling relief the defects of his own people's worship. Unclean of lips these were indeed when brought against that heavenly choir. Their social and political sin—sin of heart and home and market—came to a head in their worship, and what should have been the blossom of their life fell to the ground like a rotten leaf beneath the stainless beauty of the seraphs' praise.
[70]The way the prophet confesses about his unclean lips doesn’t surprise us, especially since he's talking about himself. Just like physical illness often focuses on one painful spot, spiritual sin also tends to zero in on a particular issue. Every person, despite being entirely sinful by nature, has their unique sense of guilt. Isaiah, as a prophet, was acutely aware of his human frailty, especially when it came to his speech. Including his people in this confession of guilt suggests a broader view. Lips can be seen as a person's outward expression. Grace is poured upon your lips, so God has blessed you forever. Anyone who doesn’t stumble in what they say is a perfect person, capable of controlling their whole body. It’s in a plant’s blossoms that its flaws become apparent; similarly, when all of a person's skills come together for the intricate task of expression, any shortcomings will emerge. Isaiah had been hearing the flawless praise of beings without sin, which made the shortcomings of his own people's worship starkly visible. They truly were unclean of lips when compared to that heavenly choir. Their social and political sins—sins of the heart, home, and marketplace—culminated in their worship, and what should have been the flourishing aspect of their lives fell away like a decayed leaf beneath the pure beauty of the seraphim's praise.
While the prophet thus passionately gathered his guilt upon his lips, a sacrament was preparing on which God concentrated His mercy to meet it. Sacrament and lips, applied mercy and presented sin, now come together. Then flew unto me one of the seraphim, and in his hand a glowing stone—with tongs had he taken it off the altar—and he touched my mouth and said, Lo, this hath touched thy[71] lips, and so thy iniquity passeth away and thy sin is atoned for.
While the prophet passionately confessed his guilt, a sacrament was being prepared where God focused His mercy to address it. Sacrament and lips, applied mercy and confessed sin, now came together. Then one of the seraphim flew to me, and in his hand was a glowing stone—he had taken it from the altar with tongs—and he touched my mouth and said, Look, this has touched your[71] lips, and now your guilt has been removed and your sin is atoned for.
The idea of this function is very evident, and a scholar who has said that it "would perhaps be quite intelligible to the contemporaries of the prophet, but is undoubtedly obscure to us," appears to have said just the reverse of what is right; for so simple a process of atonement leaves out the most characteristic details of the Jewish ritual of sacrifice, while it anticipates in an unmistakeable manner the essence of the Christian sacrament. In a scene of expiation laid under the old covenant, we are struck by the absence of oblation or sacrificial act on the part of the sinner himself. There is here no victim slain, no blood sprinkled; an altar is only parenthetically suggested, and even then in its simplest form, of a hearth on which the Divine fire is continually burning. The glowing stone, not live coal as in the English version, was no part of the temple furniture, but the ordinary means of conveying heat or applying fire in the various purposes of household life. There was, it is true, a carrying of fire in some of the temple services, as, for example, on the great Day of Atonement, but then it was effected by a small grate filled with living embers. In the household, on the other hand, when cakes had to be baked, or milk boiled, or water warmed, or in fifty similar applications of fire, a glowing stone taken from off the hearth was the invariable instrument. It is this swift and simple domestic process which Isaiah now sees substituted for the slow and intricate ceremonial of the temple—a seraph with a glowing stone in his hand, with tongs had he taken it off the altar. And yet the prophet feels this only as a more direct expression of the very same idea, with which the elaborate ritual was[72] inspired—for which the victim was slain, and the flesh consumed in fire, and the blood sprinkled. Isaiah desires nothing else, and receives no more, than the ceremonial law was intended to assure to the sinner—pardon of his sin and reconciliation to God. But our prophet will have conviction of these immediately, and with a force which the ordinary ritual is incapable of expressing. The feelings of this Jew are too intense and spiritual to be satisfied with the slow pageant of the earthly temple, whose performances to a man in his horror could only have appeared so indifferent and far away from himself as not to be really his own nor to effect what he passionately desired. Instead therefore of laying his guilt in the shape of some victim on the altar, Isaiah, with a keener sense of its inseparableness from himself, presents it to God upon his own lips. Instead of being satisfied with beholding the fire of God consume it on another body than his own, at a distance from himself, he feels that fire visit the very threshold of his nature, where he has gathered the guilt, and consume it there. The whole secret of this startling nonconformity to the law, on the very floor of the temple, is that for a man who has penetrated to the presence of God the legal forms are left far behind, and he stands face to face with the truth by which they are inspired. In that Divine Presence Isaiah is his own altar; he acts his guilt in his own person, and so he feels the expiatory fire come to his very self directly from the heavenly hearth. It is a replica of the fifty-first Psalm: For Thou delightest not in sacrifice, else would I give it; Thou hast no pleasure in burnt offering. The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit. This is my sacrifice, my sense of guilt gathered here upon my lips: my broken and contrite[73] heart, who feel myself undone before Thee, Lord, Thou wilt not despise.
The purpose of this function is quite clear, and a scholar who claimed it "might have been very understandable to the prophet's contemporaries but is definitely unclear to us" seems to have reversed the truth; because such an uncomplicated process of atonement overlooks the most distinctive features of the Jewish sacrificial ritual while clearly foreshadowing the essence of the Christian sacrament. In a scene of atonement from the old covenant, we notice the lack of a gift or sacrificial act from the sinner himself. There is no victim killed, no blood sprinkled; an altar is only briefly implied, and even then in its simplest form, as a hearth on which the Divine fire is always burning. The glowing stone, not live coal as in the English version, was never part of the temple furnishings but rather a common tool for providing heat or lighting fires for various household tasks. It’s true that fire was carried in some temple rituals, like on the great Day of Atonement, but there it was done using a small grate full of live embers. At home, when cakes needed baking, milk boiling, or water heating, a glowing stone taken from the hearth was the usual tool. This quick and straightforward domestic process is what Isaiah envisions as replacing the slow and complex ceremonies of the temple—a seraph holding a glowing stone in his hand, with tongs had he taken it off the altar. Yet the prophet experiences this as a more direct expression of the same idea that inspired the elaborate rituals—where the victim was slain, the flesh burned, and the blood sprinkled. Isaiah wants nothing more than what the ceremonial law was meant to guarantee to the sinner—forgiveness of his sin and reconciliation with God. However, our prophet desires to feel this immediately and with a power that the usual rituals can't convey. The emotions of this Jew are too deep and spiritual to be satisfied with the slow processions of the earthly temple, whose ceremonies must have seemed indifferent and distant in his time of distress, not truly his own and failing to achieve what he intensely longed for. So instead of placing his guilt as a victim on the altar, Isaiah, with a sharper awareness of its inseparability from himself, presents it to God on his own lips. Rather than being content with seeing God’s fire consume it on a body other than his own, at a distance from himself, he feels that fire touch the very edge of his being, where he has accumulated the guilt, and consume it there. The entire reason for this shocking deviation from the law, right in the temple itself, is that for someone who has truly entered into God's presence, the legal forms are left behind, and he stands directly before the truth that inspires them. In that Divine Presence, Isaiah is his own altar; he presents his guilt in his own person, and thus he feels the purifying fire come straight from the heavenly hearth to his very self. It mirrors the fifty-first Psalm: For Thou delightest not in sacrifice, else would I give it; Thou hast no pleasure in burnt offering. The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit. This is my sacrifice, my sense of guilt resting on my lips: my broken and contrite heart, feeling utterly undone before Thee, Lord, Thou wilt not despise.
It has always been remarked as one of the most powerful proofs of the originality and Divine force of Christianity, that from man's worship of God, and especially from those parts in which the forgiveness of sin is sought and assured, it did away with the necessity of a physical rite of sacrifice; that it broke the universal and immemorial habit by which man presented to God a material offering for the guilt of his soul. By remembering this fact we may measure the religious significance of the scene we now contemplate. Nearly eight centuries before there was accomplished upon Calvary that Divine Sacrifice for sin, which abrogated a rite of expiation, hitherto universally adopted by the conscience of humanity, we find a Jew, in the dispensation where such a rite was most religiously enforced, trembling under the conviction of sin, and upon a floor crowded with suggestions of physical sacrifice; yet the only sacrifice he offers is the purely spiritual one of confession. It is most notable. Look at it from a human point of view, and we can estimate Isaiah's immense spiritual originality; look at it from a Divine, and we cannot help perceiving a distinct foreshadow of what was to take place by the blood of Jesus under the new covenant. To this man, as to some others of his dispensation, whose experience our Christian sympathy recognizes so readily in the Psalms, there was granted aforetime boldness to enter into the holiest. For this is the explanation of Isaiah's marvellous disregard of the temple ritual. It is all behind him. This man has passed within the veil. Forms are all behind him, and he is face to face with God. But between two beings in that position, intercourse by the far off and[74] uncertain signals of sacrifice is inconceivable. It can only take place by the simple unfolding of the heart. It must be rational, intelligent and by speech. When man is at such close quarters with God what sacrifice is possible but the sacrifice of the lips? Form for the Divine reply there must be some, for even Christianity has its sacraments, but like them this sacrament is of the very simplest form, and like them it is accompanied by the explanatory word. As Christ under the new covenant took bread and wine, and made the homely action of feeding upon them the sign and seal to His disciples of the forgiveness of their sins, so His angel under the old and sterner covenant took the more severe, but as simple and domestic form of fire to express the same to His prophet. And we do well to emphasize that the experimental value of this sacrament of fire is bestowed by the word attached to it. It is not a dumb sacrament, with a magical efficacy. But the prophet's mind is persuaded and his conscience set at peace by the intelligible words of the minister of the sacrament.
It has always been noted as one of the strongest evidences of the originality and divine power of Christianity that, through man's worship of God—especially in seeking and assuring the forgiveness of sins—it eliminated the need for a physical sacrificial rite; it broke the long-standing practice of offering a material gift to God for the guilt of one’s soul. Remembering this fact helps us gauge the religious significance of the scene we are currently observing. Nearly eight centuries before the Divine Sacrifice for sin was fulfilled on Calvary, which abolished a universally accepted rite of atonement, we find a Jew, in an era where such a rite was most strictly enforced, trembling under the weight of his sin, surrounded by reminders of physical sacrifice; yet the only sacrifice he offers is the purely spiritual act of confession. This is particularly notable. From a human perspective, we can appreciate Isaiah's immense spiritual originality; from a Divine perspective, we can clearly see a foreshadowing of what was to happen through the blood of Jesus under the new covenant. For this man, as for others of his time, whose experiences we readily recognize in the Psalms, there was granted a boldness to enter into the holiest. This explains Isaiah's remarkable disregard for temple rituals. It is all behind him. He has passed beyond the veil. Rituals are behind him, and he is directly facing God. But for two beings in this position, communicating through distant and uncertain signs of sacrifice is unimaginable. It can only happen through the open expression of the heart. It must be rational, intelligent, and verbal. When a person is so close to God, what sacrifice is left but the sacrifice of the lips? There must be some form for the Divine response, for even Christianity has its sacraments, but like them, this sacrament is in the simplest form and is accompanied by an explanatory word. Just as Christ, under the new covenant, took bread and wine and made the simple act of eating them a sign and affirmation of His disciples' forgiveness, His angel under the old and stricter covenant took the harsher, yet simple and familiar form of fire to convey the same message to His prophet. It is important to emphasize that the experiential value of this sacrament of fire is granted by the word attached to it. It is not a silent sacrament with magical power. Instead, the prophet's mind is convinced and his conscience calmed by the clear words of the sacrament's minister.
Isaiah's sin being taken away, he is able to discern the voice of God Himself. It is in the most beautiful accordance with what has already happened that he hears this not as command, but request, and answers not of compulsion, but of freedom. And I heard the voice of the Lord saying, Whom shall I send? and who will go for us? And I said, Here am I; send me. What spiritual understanding alike of the will of God and the responsibility of man, what evangelic liberty and boldness, are here! Here we touch the spring of that high flight Isaiah takes both in prophecy and in active service for the State. Here we have the secret of the filial freedom, the life-long sense of responsibility, the regal power of initiative, the sustained[75] and unfaltering career, which distinguish Isaiah among the ministers of the old covenant, and stamp him prophet by the heart and for the life, as many of them are only by the office and for the occasion. Other prophets are the servants of the God of heaven; Isaiah stands next the Son Himself. On others the hand of the Lord is laid in irresistible compulsion; the greatest of them are often ignorant, by turns headstrong and craven, deserving correction, and generally in need of supplementary calls and inspirations. But of such scourges and such doles Isaiah's royal career is absolutely without a trace. His course, begun in freedom, is pursued without hesitation or anxiety; begun in utter self-sacrifice, it knows henceforth no moment of grudging or disobedience. Esaias is very bold, because he is so free and so fully devoted. In the presence of mind with which he meets each sudden change of politics during that bewildering half-century of Judah's history, we seem to hear his calm voice repeating its first, Here am I. Presence of mind he always had. The kaleidoscope shifts: it is now Egyptian intrigue, now Assyrian force; now a false king requiring threat of displacement by God's own hero, now a true king, but helpless and in need of consolation; now a rebellious people to be condemned, and now an oppressed and penitent one to be encouraged:—different dangers, with different sorts of salvation possible, obliging the prophet to promise different futures, and to say things inconsistent with what he had already said. Yet Isaiah never hesitates; he can always say, Here am I. We hear that voice again in the spontaneousness and versatility of his style. Isaiah is one of the great kings of literature, with every variety of style under his sway,[76] passing with perfect readiness, as subject or occasion calls, from one to another of the tones of a superbly endowed nature. Everywhere this man impresses us with his personality, with the wealth of his nature and the perfection of his control of it. But the personality is consecrated. The Here am I is followed by the send me. And its health, harmony and boldness, are derived, Isaiah being his own witness, from this early sense of pardon and purification at the Divine hands. Isaiah is indeed a king and a priest unto God—a king with all his powers at his own command, a priest with them all consecrated to the service of Heaven.
Isaiah's sin has been removed, allowing him to hear the voice of God Himself. It's beautifully consistent with everything that has happened, as he perceives this not as a command, but as a request, and responds not out of obligation, but from a place of freedom. And I heard the voice of the Lord saying, Whom shall I send? and who will go for us? And I said, Here am I; send me. What spiritual insight into God's will and human responsibility, what freedom and boldness in faith, are present here! This is where we see the foundation of Isaiah's remarkable journey in prophecy and in service to the State. Here lies the secret of his freedom, his lifelong sense of duty, the royal power of taking initiative, and his sustained, unwavering path that sets him apart among the servants of the old covenant, marking him as a true prophet by heart and life, while many are merely by position and occasion. Other prophets serve the God of heaven; Isaiah is beside the Son Himself. For others, the hand of the Lord imposes irresistible pressure; the greatest among them often act out of ignorance, alternately stubborn and fearful, deserving correction, and usually needing additional calls and inspiration. But Isaiah's royal journey shows no signs of such struggles or shortcomings. His path, starting in freedom, moves forward without doubt or worry; initiated in total selflessness, he never wavers with resentment or disobedience. Esaias is very bold, because he is so free and fully committed. In the clarity with which he navigates each sudden political shift during the confusing half-century of Judah’s history, we can almost hear his steady voice echoing its original, Here am I. He always possesses this kind of presence of mind. The situation changes: it’s now Egyptian intrigue, then Assyrian threats; at one moment there's a false king who needs to be forced out by God’s chosen hero, then a true king who is vulnerable and in need of support; there's a rebellious nation needing condemnation, and then a hurting and repentant one needing encouragement:—different challenges, each requiring different forms of salvation, forcing the prophet to declare different futures and sometimes to communicate contradictions to what he had previously expressed. Yet Isaiah never wavers; he can consistently declare, Here am I. We hear that voice again in the spontaneity and adaptability of his writing style. Isaiah is one of the great masters of literature, commanding a variety of styles,[76] seamlessly switching, as the occasion demands, from one tone to another, all stemming from his richly endowed nature. This man leaves us impressed by his personality, the richness of his spirit, and the mastery he has over it. But his personality is sanctified. The Here am I is always followed by send me. Its vitality, coherence, and courage come, as Isaiah himself testifies, from his early sense of forgiveness and purification from the Divine. Isaiah indeed stands as a king and a priest to God—a king with all his abilities under his control, a priest with all of them dedicated to the service of Heaven.
One cannot pass away from these verses without observing the plain answer which they give to the question, What is a call to the ministry of God? In these days of dust and distraction, full of party cries, with so many side issues of doctrine and duty presenting themselves, and the solid attractions of so many other services insensibly leading men to look for the same sort of attractiveness in the ministry, it may prove a relief to some to ponder the simple elements of Isaiah's call to be a professional and life-long prophet. Isaiah got no "call" in our conventional sense of the word, no compulsion that he must go, no articulate voice describing him as the sort of man needed for the work, nor any of those similar "calls" which sluggish and craven spirits so often desire to relieve them of the responsibility or the strenuous effort needed in deciding for a profession which their conscience will not permit them to refuse. Isaiah got no such call. After passing through the fundamental religious experiences of forgiveness and cleansing, which are in every case the indispensable premises of life with God, Isaiah was left to himself. No direct summons[77] was addressed to him, no compulsion was laid on him; but he heard the voice of God asking generally for messengers, and he on his own responsibility answered it for himself in particular. He heard from the Divine lips of the Divine need for messengers, and he was immediately full of the mind that he was the man for the mission, and of the heart to give himself to it. So great an example cannot be too closely studied by candidates for the ministry in our own day. Sacrifice is not the half-sleepy, half-reluctant submission to the force of circumstance or opinion, in which shape it is so often travestied among us, but the resolute self-surrender and willing resignation of a free and reasonable soul. There are many in our day who look for an irresistible compulsion into the ministry of the Church; sensitive as they are to the material bias by which men roll off into other professions, they pray for something of a similar kind to prevail with them in this direction also. There are men who pass into the ministry by social pressure or the opinion of the circles they belong to, and there are men who adopt the profession simply because it is on the line of least resistance. From which false beginnings rise the spent force, the premature stoppages, the stagnancy, the aimlessness and heartlessness, which are the scandals of the professional ministry and the weakness of the Christian Church in our day. Men who drift into the ministry, as it is certain so many do, become mere ecclesiastical flotsam and jetsam, incapable of giving carriage to any soul across the waters of this life, uncertain of their own arrival anywhere, and of all the waste of their generation, the most patent and disgraceful. God will have no drift-wood for His sacrifices, no drift-men for His ministers. Self-consecration is the[78] beginning of His service, and a sense of our own freedom and our own responsibility is an indispensable element in the act of self-consecration. We—not God—have to make the decision. We are not to be dead, but living, sacrifices, and everything which renders us less than fully alive both mars at the time the sincerity of our surrender and reacts for evil upon the whole of our subsequent ministry.
One cannot leave these verses without noticing the clear answer they provide to the question, What does it mean to have a call to serve God? In today's world, filled with distractions and competing voices, and with various issues of doctrine and duty pulling attention in different directions, many are tempted to seek the same kind of appeal in ministry as they find in other professions. It might be refreshing for some to reflect on the basic elements of Isaiah's call to be a lifelong prophet. Isaiah didn't receive a "call" in the usual sense; he wasn't compelled to go, he didn't hear a clear voice telling him what kind of person was needed, and he didn't have one of those elaborate "calls" that often relieve lazy and fearful individuals from the effort of choosing a profession they know they must pursue. Isaiah had no such call. After experiencing the essential religious acts of forgiveness and cleansing, which are necessary for anyone's relationship with God, Isaiah was left to decide for himself. No direct message was given to him, no pressure was placed upon him; yet he heard God's general call for messengers and took it upon himself to answer for his own specific role. He understood the Divine need for messengers and immediately felt that he was the right person for the task, ready to commit to it. Such a powerful example deserves close attention from those considering the ministry today. Sacrifice isn't simply a hesitant submission to circumstances or opinions, as is often misrepresented; it's a determined self-giving and voluntary surrender from a free and thoughtful soul. Many today seek an overwhelming push to enter church ministry; they are aware of how easily people gravitate toward other professions and hope for something similar to happen to them. Some enter the ministry due to social pressure or the expectations of their communities, while others choose it because it seems like the path of least resistance. These misguided beginnings lead to exhaustion, premature exits, stagnation, lack of direction, and lack of passion, all of which tarnish the professional ministry and weaken the Christian Church today. People who drift into ministry—many do—end up as mere ecclesiastical flotsam, unable to carry anyone across life's waters, uncertain about their own purpose, and contributing to the great waste of their generation, which is both obvious and shameful. God will not accept driftwood for His sacrifices, nor drift-men for His ministers. Self-dedication is the starting point of His service, and having a sense of our own freedom and responsibility is essential in committing ourselves. We—not God—must make the choice. We are meant to be living sacrifices, and anything that prevents us from being fully alive compromises the integrity of our surrender and negatively impacts our entire future ministry.
III. The Commission (vv. 9-13).
III. The Commission (vv. 9-13).
A heart so resolutely devoted as we have seen Isaiah's to be was surely prepared against any degree of discouragement, but probably never did man receive so awful a commission as he describes himself to have done. Not that we are to suppose that this fell upon Isaiah all at once, in the suddenness and distinctness with which he here records it. Our sense of its awfulness will only be increased when we realize that Isaiah became aware of it, not in the shock of a single discovery, sufficiently great to have carried its own anæsthetic along with it, but through a prolonged process of disillusion, and at the pain of those repeated disappointments, which are all the more painful that none singly is great enough to stupefy. It is just at this point of our chapter, that we feel most the need of supposing it to have been written some years after the consecration of Isaiah, when his experience had grown long enough to articulate the dim forebodings of that solemn moment. Go and say to this people, Hearing, hear ye, but understand not; seeing, see ye, but know not. Make fat the heart of this people, and its ears make heavy, and its eyes smear, lest it see with its eyes, and hear with its ears, and its heart understand, and it turn again and be healed.[79] No prophet, we may be sure, would be asked by God to go and tell his audiences that in so many words, at the beginning of his career. It is only by experience that a man understands that kind of a commission,[10] and for the required experience Isaiah had not long to wait after entering on his ministry. Ahaz himself, in whose death-year it is supposed by many that Isaiah wrote this account of his consecration—the conduct of Ahaz himself was sufficient to have brought out the convictions of the prophet's heart in this startling form, in which he has stated his commission. By the word of the Lord and an offer of a sign from Him, Isaiah did make fat that monarch's heart and smear his eyes. And perverse as the rulers of Judah were in the examples and policies they set, the people were as blindly bent on following them to destruction. Every one, said Isaiah, when he must have been for some time a prophet—every one is a hypocrite and an evildoer, and every mouth speaketh folly.
A heart as dedicated as Isaiah’s surely prepared him for any level of discouragement, but it's unlikely that anyone ever received such a dreadful commission as he describes. We shouldn’t think that this realization hit Isaiah all at once, with the shock and clarity he records here. Our understanding of its severity deepens when we recognize that Isaiah became aware of it not through an overwhelming single revelation, which might have dulled the impact, but through a prolonged process of disillusionment, coupled with the pain of repeated disappointments—painful because none was significant enough to numb him. At this point in our chapter, we really feel the need to consider that it might have been written years after Isaiah's consecration when he had enough experience to articulate the vague fears he felt during that solemn moment. Go and say to this people, Hearing, hear ye, but understand not; seeing, see ye, but know not. Make fat the heart of this people, and its ears make heavy, and its eyes smear, lest it see with its eyes, and hear with its ears, and its heart understand, and it turn again and be healed.[79] No prophet, we can be sure, would be sent by God to tell his audience that outright at the start of his career. It’s only through experience that one truly grasps such a commission, and Isaiah didn’t have to wait long after beginning his ministry for that experience. Ahaz himself, in whose death year many believe Isaiah wrote this account of his consecration, had behavior that was enough to draw out the prophet's deep convictions in the shocking form he presented his commission. By the word of the Lord and an offer of a sign from Him, Isaiah did indeed harden that king’s heart and blind his eyes. And as twisted as the rulers of Judah were in their actions and policies, the people blindly followed them to their doom. Every one, Isaiah declared, when he must have been a prophet for some time—every one is a hypocrite and an evildoer, and every mouth speaks folly.
But if that clear, bitter way of putting the matter can have come to Isaiah only with the experience of some years, why does he place it upon the lips of God, as they give him his commission? Because Isaiah is stating not merely his own singular experience, but a truth always true of the preaching of the word of God, and of which no prophet at the time of his consecration to that ministry can be without at least a foreboding. We have not exhausted the meaning of this awful commission when we say that it is only[80] a forcible anticipation of the prophet's actual experience. There is more here than one man's experience. Over and over again are these words quoted in the New Testament, till we learn to find them true always and everywhere that the Word of God is preached to men,—the description of what would seem to be its necessary effect upon many souls. Both Jesus and Paul use Isaiah's commission of themselves. They do so like Isaiah at an advanced stage in their ministry, when the shock of misunderstanding and rejection has been repeatedly felt, but then not solely as an apt description of their own experience. They quote God's words to Isaiah as a prophecy fulfilled in their own case—that is to say, as the statement of a great principle or truth of which their own ministry is only another instance. Their own disappointments have roused them to the fact, that this is always an effect of the word of God upon numbers of men—to deaden their spiritual faculties. While Matthew and the book of Acts adopt the milder Greek version of Isaiah's commission, John gives a rendering that is even stronger than the original. He hath blinded, he says of God Himself, their eyes and hardened their hearts, lest they should see with their eyes and perceive with their hearts. In Mark's narrative Christ says that He speaks to them that are outside in parables, for the purpose that seeing they may see, and not perceive, and hearing they may hear, and not understand, lest haply they should turn again and it should be forgiven them. We may suspect, in an utterance so strange to the lips of the Lord of salvation, merely the irony of His baffled love. But it is rather the statement of what He believed to be the necessary effect of a ministry like His own. It[81] marks the direction, not of His desire, but of natural sequence.
But if that clear, harsh way of expressing things only came to Isaiah after years of experience, why does he attribute it to God when he receives his mission? Because Isaiah is not just sharing his personal experience; he’s stating a truth that always applies to the preaching of God’s word, one that no prophet entering that ministry can escape from at least sensing. We haven’t fully captured the significance of this daunting mission by merely saying it’s a strong preview of the prophet’s actual experience. There’s more at play than just one person’s experience. These words are repeatedly quoted in the New Testament, teaching us that they ring true everywhere the Word of God is preached—it describes the likely effect it has on many souls. Jesus and Paul both refer to Isaiah's mission in their own contexts. They do this, just like Isaiah, after enduring the repeated shock of misunderstanding and rejection, but it’s not just an accurate portrayal of their experiences. They refer to God's words to Isaiah as a fulfilled prophecy in their own situations; in other words, they see it as a statement of a great principle or truth, with their own ministry being just another example. Their disappointments have awakened them to the reality that this is often how God’s word affects many people—it dims their spiritual awareness. While Matthew and the book of Acts use a gentler Greek version of Isaiah's commission, John presents an even stronger interpretation than the original. He states that God Himself “has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts, so they cannot see with their eyes and understand with their hearts.” In Mark's account, Christ explains that He speaks to those outside in parables, “so that seeing they may see and not perceive, and hearing they may hear and not understand, lest perhaps they should turn again and be forgiven.” We might wonder, in such a strange declaration from the Lord of salvation, if it's simply ironic frustration from His unrequited love. But it’s actually a declaration of what He believed to be the inevitable effect of a ministry like His. It reflects not His desire but the natural outcome.
With these instances we can go back to Isaiah and understand why he should have described the bitter fruits of experience as an imperative laid upon him by God. Make fat the heart of this people, and its ears make heavy, and its eyes do thou smear. It is the fashion of the prophet's grammar, when it would state a principle or necessary effect, to put it in the form of a command. What God expresses to Isaiah so imperatively as almost to take our breath away; what Christ uttered with such abruptness that we ask, Does He speak in irony? what Paul laid down as the conviction of a long and patient ministry, is the great truth that the Word of God has not only a saving power, but that even in its gentlest pleadings and its purest Gospel, even by the mouth of Him who came, not to condemn, but to save the world, it has a power that is judicial and condemnatory.
With these examples, we can revisit Isaiah and understand why he described the harsh outcomes of experience as an obligation placed on him by God. Make fat the heart of this people, and its ears make heavy, and its eyes do thou smear. It's common in the prophet's language, when stating a principle or necessary effect, to express it as a command. What God tells Isaiah with such urgency takes our breath away; what Christ said so suddenly makes us wonder if He speaks ironically; what Paul declared as the core belief of a long and patient ministry, is the profound truth that the Word of God possesses not just a saving power, but that even in its gentlest appeals and purest Gospel, even through the voice of Him who came, not to condemn, but to save the world, it carries a judicial and condemnatory power.
It is frequently remarked by us as perhaps the most deplorable fact of our experience, that there exists in human nature an accursed facility for turning God's gifts to precisely the opposite ends from those for which He gave them. So common is man's misunderstanding of the plainest signs, and so frequent his abuse of the most evident favours of Heaven, that a spectator of the drama of human history might imagine its Author to have been a Cynic or Comedian, portraying for His own amusement the loss of the erring at the very moment of what might have been their recovery, the frustration of love at the point of its greatest warmth and expectancy. Let him look closer, however, and he will perceive, not a comedy, but a tragedy, for neither chance nor cruel sport is here[82] at work, but free will and the laws of habit, with retribution and penalty. These actors are not puppets in the hand of a Power that moves them at will; each of them plays his own part, and the abuse and contradiction, of which he is guilty, are but the prerogative of his freedom. They are free beings who thus reject the gift of Divine assistance, and so piteously misunderstand Divine truth. Look closer still, and you will see that the way they talk, the impression they accept of God's goodness, the effect of His judgements upon them, is determined not at the moment of their choice, and not by a single act of their will, but by the whole tenor of their previous life. In the sudden flash of some gift or opportunity, men reveal the stuff of which they are made, the disposition they have bred in themselves. Opportunity in human life is as often judgement as it is salvation. When we perceive these things, we understand that life is not a comedy, where chance governs or incongruous situations are invented by an Almighty Satirist for his own sport, but a tragedy, with all tragedy's pathetic elements of royal wills contending in freedom with each other, of men's wills clashing with God's: men the makers of their own destinies, and Nemesis not directing, but following their actions. We go back to the very fundamentals of our nature on this dread question. To understand what has been called "a great law in human degeneracy," that "the evil heart can assimilate good to itself and convert it to its nature," we must understand what free will means, and take into account the terrible influence of habit.
It's often said that one of the most unfortunate truths about our experience is that humans have a troubling knack for twisting God's gifts into exactly the opposite of what they were intended for. People frequently misunderstand the clearest signs, and abuse the most obvious blessings from Heaven, such that an observer of human history might think its Creator was a Cynic or Comedian, creating a spectacle for His amusement of the misguided at the very moment when they could have been saved, and the frustration of love right when it’s at its most passionate and hopeful. However, if one looks closer, they will realize it's not a comedy but a tragedy, as neither chance nor cruel fun is at play here, but rather free will and the laws of habit, along with consequences and punishment. These individuals are not marionettes controlled by a higher Power; each plays their own role, and their errors and contradictions stem from their freedom. They are free beings who reject the gift of Divine help and profoundly misconstrue Divine truth. Look even deeper, and you’ll see that the way they express themselves, their perception of God's goodness, and the impact of His judgments on them are shaped not just by their immediate choices or singular acts of will, but by the overall pattern of their past lives. In a sudden moment of gift or opportunity, people reveal their true nature and the attitudes they’ve developed. In human life, opportunity is often as much a judgment as it is a chance for salvation. When we grasp these realities, we see that life is not a comedy, where chance rules or absurd situations are crafted by an Almighty Satirist for entertainment, but a tragedy, filled with the poignant elements of powerful wills freely struggling against one another, of human wills colliding with God’s: humans shaping their own fates, while Nemesis does not direct but follows their actions. We must confront the very essence of our nature on this serious matter. To comprehend what has been termed "a great law in human degeneration," that "the evil heart can assimilate good and twist it to its nature," we need to understand what free will entails and consider the awful influence of habit.
Now there is no more conspicuous instance of this law, than that which is afforded by the preaching of the Gospel of God. God's Word, as Christ reminds us,[83] does not fall on virgin soil; it falls on soil already holding other seed. When a preacher stands up with the Word of God in a great congregation, vast as Scripture warrants us for believing his power to be, his is not the only power that is operative. Each man present has a life behind that hour and place, lying away in the darkness, silent and dead as far as the congregation are concerned, but in his own heart as vivid and loud as the voice of the preacher, though he be preaching never so forcibly. The prophet is not the only power in the delivery of God's Word, nor is the Holy Spirit the only power. That would make all preaching of the Word a mere display. But the Bible represents it as a strife. And now it is said of men themselves that they harden their hearts against the Word, and now—because such hardening is the result of previous sinning, and has therefore a judicial character—that God hardens their hearts. Simon, Simon, said Christ to a face that spread out to His own all the ardour of worship, Satan is desiring to have you, but I have prayed that your faith fail not. God sends His Word into our hearts; the Mediator stands by, and prays that it make us His own. But there are other factors in the operation, and the result depends on our own will; it depends on our own will, and it is dreadfully determined by our habits.
Now there's no clearer example of this principle than the preaching of the Gospel of God. God's Word, as Christ reminds us,[83] doesn’t land on empty ground; it hits soil that's already got other seeds in it. When a preacher stands up with the Word of God in a large congregation, as vast as Scripture leads us to believe his power is, he isn't the only influence at work. Each person there has a life that exists beyond that moment and place, hidden away in darkness, silent and dead to the congregation, but in their own hearts, it's as vivid and loud as the preacher's voice, no matter how forcefully he preaches. The prophet isn't the only force in delivering God's Word, nor is the Holy Spirit the only power at play. If that were the case, all preaching would just be a showcase. But the Bible depicts it as a struggle. It's said that people harden their hearts against the Word, and because this hardening stems from past sin, it has a judicial aspect—so God hardens their hearts too. Simon, Simon, Jesus said to someone whose worship radiated warmth, Satan is eager to have you, but I've prayed that your faith won't fail. God sends His Word into our hearts; the Mediator is present, praying that it makes us His own. However, there are other factors at play, and the outcome relies on our own will; it depends on our will, and it's deeply influenced by our habits.
Now this is one of the first facts to which a young reformer or prophet awakes. Such an awakening is a necessary element in his education and apprenticeship. He has seen the Lord high and lifted up. His lips have been touched by the coal from off the altar. His first feeling is that nothing can withstand that power, nothing gainsay this inspiration. Is he a Nehemiah, and the hand of the Lord has been[84] mighty upon him? Then he feels that he has but to tell his fellows of it to make them as enthusiastic in the Lord's work as himself. Is he a Mazzini, aflame from his boyhood with aspirations for his country, consecrated from his birth to the cause of duty? Then he leaps with joy upon his mission; he has but to show himself, to speak, to lead the way, and his country is free. Is he—to descend to a lower degree of prophecy—a Fourier, sensitive more than most to how anarchic society is, and righteously eager to settle it upon stable foundations? Then he draws his plans for reconstruction, he projects his phalanges and phalansteres, and believes that he has solved the social problem. Is he—to come back to the heights—an Isaiah, with the Word of God in him like fire? Then he sees his vision of the perfect state; he thinks to lift his people to it by a word. O house of Jacob, he says, come ye, and let us walk in the light of the Lord!
Now, this is one of the first truths that a young reformer or prophet realizes. This awakening is a vital part of their education and training. They have encountered the Lord, exalted and powerful. Their first reaction is that nothing can oppose that power, nothing can challenge this inspiration. If they are a Nehemiah and the hand of the Lord has been strong upon them, they believe that by sharing this experience with others, they can inspire them to be as passionate about the Lord's work as they are. If they are a Mazzini, burning with ambition for their country since childhood, dedicated to the cause of duty from birth, they joyfully embrace their mission; just by showing up, speaking, and leading, they believe their country will be free. If they are, on a more modest level, a Fourier, highly aware of how chaotic society is and determined to establish stable foundations, then they draft plans for reconstruction, design their phalanxes and phalansteres, convinced that they have solved the social problem. If they return to a higher calling as an Isaiah, with the Word of God burning inside them, then they envision the perfect state and believe they can elevate their people with just a word. *O house of Jacob*, they say, *come, and let us walk in the light of the Lord*!
For all of whom the next necessary stage of experience is one of disappointment, with the hard commission, Make the heart of this people fat. They must learn that, if God has caught themselves young, and when it was possible to make them entirely His own, the human race to whom He sends them is old, too old for them to effect much upon the mass of it beyond the hardening and perpetuation of evil. Fourier finds that to produce his perfect State he would need to re-create mankind, to cut down the tree to the very roots, and begin again. After the first rush of patriotic fervour, which carried so many of his countrymen with him, Mazzini discovers himself in "a moral desert," confesses that the struggle to liberate his fatherland, which has only quickened him to further devotion in so great a cause, has been productive of scepticism in his[85] followers, and has left them withered and hardened of heart, whom it had found so capable of heroic impulses. He tells us how they upbraided and scorned him, left him in exile, and returned to their homes, from which they had set out with vows to die for their country, doubting now whether there was anything at all worth living or dying for outside themselves. Mazzini's description of the first passage of his career is invaluable for the light which it throws upon this commission of Isaiah. History does not contain a more dramatic representation of the entirely opposite effects of the same Divine movement upon different natures. While the first efforts for the liberty of Italy materialized the greater number of his countrymen, whom Mazzini had persuaded to embark upon it, the failure and their consequent defection only served to strip this heroic soul of the last rags of selfishness, and consecrate it more utterly to the will of God and the duty that lay before it.
For everyone whose next necessary stage of experience is one of disappointment, facing the tough task of, Make the heart of this people fat. They must realize that if God caught them while they were young, when it was possible to make them completely His own, the human race He sends them to is old, too old for them to make a significant impact on the majority, beyond the hardening and continuation of evil. Fourier finds that to create his perfect State, he would need to completely reboot mankind, to cut down the tree to its very roots and start over. After the initial wave of patriotic fervor, which rallied many of his fellow countrymen, Mazzini finds himself in "a moral desert," admitting that the struggle to free his homeland, which has only fueled his devotion to such a noble cause, has led to skepticism among his followers, leaving them withered and hard-hearted, even though they once showed great potential for heroism. He recounts how they criticized and mocked him, abandoned him in exile, and returned to their homes, from which they had set out with promises to die for their country, now doubting if there was anything worth living or dying for beyond themselves. Mazzini's account of the early part of his journey is invaluable for the perspective it provides on this commission from Isaiah. History doesn't present a more dramatic illustration of the completely different effects of the same Divine movement on varying natures. While the initial efforts for Italy's liberty energized the majority of his fellow countrymen that Mazzini had inspired to join the cause, the failure and their resulting defection only served to strip this heroic soul of its last remnants of selfishness and further dedicate it to God's will and the duty ahead.
A few sentences from the confessions of the Italian patriot may be quoted, with benefit to our appreciation of what the Hebrew prophet must have passed through.
A few sentences from the confessions of the Italian patriot can be quoted, which will help us understand what the Hebrew prophet must have experienced.
"It was the tempest of doubt, which I believe all who devote their lives to a great enterprise, yet have not dried and withered up their soul—like Robespierre—beneath some barren intellectual formula, but have retained a loving heart, are doomed, once at least, to battle through. My heart was overflowing with and greedy of affection, as fresh and eager to unfold to joy as in the days when sustained by my mother's smile, as full of fervid hope for others, at least, if not for myself. But during these fatal months there darkened round me such a hurricane of sorrow, disillusion and deception as to bring before my eyes, in all its ghastly nakedness, a foreshadowing of the old age of my soul, solitary in a desert world, wherein no comfort in the struggle was vouchsafed to me. It was not only the overthrow for an indefinite period of every Italian hope, ... it was the falling to pieces of that moral edifice of faith and love from which alone I had derived strength for the combat; the scepticism I saw arising round me on every side; the failure of faith in those who had[86] solemnly bound themselves to pursue unshaken the path we had known at the outset to be choked with sorrows; the distrust I detected in those most dear to me, as to the motives and intentions which sustained and urged me onward in the evidently unequal struggle.... When I felt that I was indeed alone in the world, I drew back in terror at the void before me. There, in that moral desert, doubt came upon me. Perhaps I was wrong, and the world right? Perhaps my idea was indeed a dream?... One morning I awoke to find my mind tranquil and my spirit calmed, as one who has passed through a great danger. The first thought that passed across my spirit was, Your sufferings are the temptations of egotism, and arise from a misconception of life.... I perceived that although every instinct of my heart rebelled against that fatal and ignoble definition of life which makes it to be a search after happiness, yet I had not completely freed myself from the dominating influence exercised by it upon the age.... I had been unable to realize the true ideal of love—love without earthly hope.... Life is a mission, duty therefore its highest law. From the idea of God I descended to faith in a mission and its logical consequence—duty the supreme rule of life; and having reached that faith, I swore to myself that nothing in this world should again make me doubt or forsake it. It was, as Dante says, passing through martyrdom to peace—'a forced and desperate peace.' I do not deny, for I fraternized with sorrow, and wrapped myself in it as in a mantle; but yet it was peace, for I learned to suffer without rebellion, and to live calmly and in harmony with my own spirit. I reverently bless God the Father for what consolations of affection—I can conceive of no other—He has vouchsafed to me in my later years; and in them I gather strength to struggle with the occasional return of weariness of existence. But even were these consolations denied me, I believe I should still be what I am. Whether the sun shine with the serene splendour of an Italian noon, or the leaden, corpse-like hue of the northern mist be above us, I cannot see that it changes our duty. God dwells above the earthly heaven, and the holy stars of faith and the future still shine within our souls, even though their light consume itself unreflected as the sepulchral lamp."
"It was a storm of doubt that I believe everyone who dedicates their life to a great cause—and hasn’t let their soul dry up and wither like Robespierre under some empty intellectual idea but has kept a loving heart—is destined to face at least once. My heart was overflowing with and craving affection, eager to embrace joy just as it did back when I found comfort in my mother's smile, filled with passionate hope for others, if not for myself. But during those fateful months, I was caught in a whirlwind of sorrow, disillusionment, and deception that revealed to me the harsh truth of my soul's aging, isolated in a desolate world where I found no comfort in the struggle. It wasn’t just the endless collapse of every Italian hope; it was the crumbling of the moral foundation of faith and love from which I drew strength for the battle; the skepticism that was rising all around me; the loss of faith in those who had [86] solemnly promised to stay on the path we knew would be filled with sorrow; the distrust I sensed from those closest to me regarding the motives and intentions that pushed me forward in this uneven struggle.... When I realized that I was truly alone in the world, I felt a deep fear at the emptiness ahead of me. In that moral desert, doubt overwhelmed me. Maybe I was wrong, and the world was right? Maybe my idea was just a fantasy?... One morning, I woke up to find my mind at peace and my spirit calm, like someone who has survived a great danger. The first thought that crossed my mind was, Your sufferings are the temptations of selfishness, and stem from a misunderstanding of life.... I recognized that even though every instinct in my heart rejected that deadly and shallow definition of life as a search for happiness, I hadn’t completely freed myself from the dominant influence it held over the time.... I hadn’t been able to grasp the true ideal of love—love without hopes tied to this world.... Life is a mission, and duty is therefore its highest principle. From the concept of God, I came to believe in a mission and its logical consequence—duty as the supreme rule of life; and having reached that belief, I vowed to myself that nothing in this world would ever make me doubt or abandon it again. It was, as Dante says, a journey through suffering to peace—'a forced and desperate peace.' I won’t deny it, I embraced sorrow and wrapped myself in it like a cloak; yet, it was peace, for I learned to suffer without rebellion and to live calmly and in harmony with my own spirit. I humbly thank God the Father for the comforts of affection—I can think of no others—He has granted me in my later years; and in them, I find the strength to deal with the occasional weariness of life. But even if these comforts were taken from me, I believe I would still be who I am. Whether the sun shines with the clear brilliance of an Italian noon, or the dull, lifeless hue of the northern fog looms above us, I don’t see how it changes our duty. God exists beyond the earthly heavens, and the holy stars of faith and the future continue to shine within our souls, even if their light fades away unreflected like a funeral lamp."
Such sentences are the best commentary we can offer on our text. The cases of the Hebrew and Italian prophets are wonderfully alike. We who have read Isaiah's fifth chapter know how his heart also was "overflowing with and greedy of affection,"[87] and in the second and third chapters we have seen "the hurricane of sorrow, disillusion and deception darken round him." "The falling to pieces of the moral edifice of faith and love," "scepticism rising on every side," "failure of faith in those who had solemnly bound themselves," "distrust detected in those most dear to me"—and all felt by the prophet as the effect of the sacred movement God had inspired him to begin:—how exact a counterpart it is to the cumulative process of brutalizing which Isaiah heard God lay upon him, with the imperative Make the heart of this people fat! In such a morally blind, deaf and dead-hearted world Isaiah's faith was indeed "to consume itself unreflected like the sepulchral lamp." The glimpse into his heart given us by Mazzini enables us to realize with what terror Isaiah faced such a void. O Lord, how long? This, too, breathes the air of "a forced and desperate peace," the spirit of one who, having realized life as a mission, has made the much more rare recognition that the logical consequence is neither the promise of success nor the assurance of sympathy, but simply the acceptance of duty, with whatever results and under whatever skies it pleases God to bring over him.
Such sentences are the best commentary we can offer on our text. The experiences of the Hebrew and Italian prophets are remarkably similar. Those of us who have read Isaiah's fifth chapter know how his heart was "overflowing with and greedy for affection,"[87] and in the second and third chapters, we've seen "the hurricane of sorrow, disillusion, and deception darken around him." "The breakdown of the moral structure of faith and love," "skepticism rising on every side," "the failure of faith in those who had solemnly committed," "distrust revealed in those most dear to me"—all felt by the prophet as a result of the sacred movement God inspired him to initiate:—how closely it matches the cumulative process of brutalization that Isaiah heard God lay upon him, with the imperative Make the heart of this people fat! In such a morally blind, deaf, and heartless world, Isaiah's faith was indeed "to consume itself unreflected like the sepulchral lamp." The insight into his heart provided by Mazzini allows us to grasp the terror with which Isaiah confronted such emptiness. O Lord, how long? This, too, carries the feeling of "a forced and desperate peace," the spirit of someone who, having seen life as a mission, has made the much rarer realization that the logical consequence is neither the promise of success nor the guarantee of sympathy, but simply the acceptance of duty, with whatever outcomes and under whatever conditions it pleases God to bring upon him.
And homes without a man,
And the land is left completely abandoned,
And Jehovah has moved man far away,
And vast is the desert in the center of the land;
And still, if there's a tenth in it,
It will be used for consumption again.
Just like the terebinth and the oak,
Their stock stays with them when they are cut down,
The sacred seed will be its source.
The meaning of these words is too plain to require exposition, but we can hardly over-emphasize them. This is to be Isaiah's one text throughout his career. "Judgement shall pass through; a remnant shall remain." All the politics of his day, the movement of the world's forces, the devastation of the holy land, the first captivities of the holy people, the reiterated defeats and disappointments of the next fifty years—all shall be clear and tolerable to Isaiah as the fulfilling of the sentence to which he listened in such "forced and desperate peace" on the day of his consecration. He has had the worst branded into him; henceforth no man nor thing may trouble him. He has seen the worst, and knows there is a beginning beyond. So when the wickedness of Judah and the violence of Assyria alike seem most unrestrained—Assyria most bent on destroying Judah, and Judah least worthy to live—Isaiah will yet cling to this, that a remnant must remain. All his prophecies will be variations of this text; it is the key to his apparent paradoxes. He will proclaim the Assyrians to be God's instrument, yet devote them to destruction. He will hail their advance on Judah, and yet as exultingly mark its limit, because of the determination in which he asked the question, O Lord, how long? and the clearness with which he understood the until, that came in answer to it. Every prediction he makes, every turn he seeks to give to the practical politics of Judah, are simply due to his grasp of these two facts—a withering and repeated devastation, in the end a bare survival. He has, indeed, prophecies which travel farther; occasionally he is permitted to indulge in visions of a new dispensation. Like Moses, he climbs his Pisgah, but he is like Moses also in this, that his lifetime is exhausted with the attainment[89] of the margin of a long period of judgement and struggle, and then he passes from our sight, and no man knoweth his sepulchre unto this day. As abruptly as this vision closes with the announcement of the remnant, so abruptly does Isaiah disappear on the fulfilment of the announcement—some forty years subsequent to this vision—in the sudden rescue of the holy seed from the grasp of Sennacherib.
The meaning of these words is so clear that it doesn’t need explaining, yet we can’t stress them enough. This will be Isaiah's central message throughout his life. "Judgment will pass through; a remnant will remain." All the politics of his time, the shifting forces in the world, the devastation of the holy land, the first captivities of the holy people, the continuous defeats and setbacks over the next fifty years—all will be understandable and bearable to Isaiah as the fulfillment of the sentence he heard during that "forced and desperate peace" on the day he was consecrated. He has had the worst experiences burned into him; from now on, nothing and no one can disturb him. He has witnessed the worst and knows there’s a beginning beyond it. So, when the wickedness of Judah and the brutality of Assyria appear most unchecked—Assyria hell-bent on destroying Judah, and Judah least deserving to survive—Isaiah will still cling to the belief that a remnant must remain. All his prophecies will play variations on this theme; it is the key to his seeming contradictions. He will announce the Assyrians as God's instrument, yet dedicate them to destruction. He will cheer their advance on Judah while also marking its limits with joy, because of the determination with which he asked the question, O Lord, how long? and the clarity with which he understood the until that followed. Every prediction he makes, every attempt he makes to shift the political landscape of Judah, stem from his grasp of these two truths—a relentless and repeated devastation, ultimately leading to a bare survival. He does, in fact, have prophecies that look further ahead; occasionally, he gets to envision a new era. Like Moses, he climbs his Pisgah, but he is also like Moses in that his life is spent on the edge of a long stretch of judgment and struggle, and then he fades from our view, and no one knows where he was buried to this day. Just as abruptly as this vision ends with the mention of the remnant, Isaiah disappears upon the fulfillment of that announcement—about forty years later—when the holy seed is suddenly rescued from the grip of Sennacherib.
We have now finished the first period of Isaiah's career. Let us catalogue what are his leading doctrines up to this point. High above a very sinful people, and beyond all their conceptions of Him, Jehovah, the national God, rises holy, exalted in righteousness. From such a God to such a people it can only be judgement and affliction that pass; and these shall not be averted by the fact that He is the national God, and they His worshippers. Of this affliction the Assyrians gathering far off upon the horizon are evidently to be the instruments. The affliction shall be very sweeping; again and again shall it come; but the Lord will finally save a remnant of His people. Three elements compose this preaching—a very keen and practical conscience of sin; an overpowering vision of God, in whose immediate intimacy the prophet believes himself to be; and a very sharp perception of the politics of the day.
We have now completed the first phase of Isaiah's career. Let’s outline his main teachings up to this point. Above a deeply sinful people, and beyond their understanding of Him, Jehovah, the national God, stands holy, exalted in righteousness. From such a God to such a people, only judgment and suffering can flow; and these won’t be avoided just because He is the national God and they are His worshippers. The Assyrians, gathering far off on the horizon, are clearly set to be the instruments of this suffering. The affliction will be widespread; it will come again and again; but the Lord will ultimately save a remnant of His people. Three elements make up this message—a strong and practical awareness of sin; a profound vision of God, with whom the prophet believes himself to be in close relationship; and a sharp understanding of the current political landscape.
One question rises. In this part of Isaiah's ministry there is no trace of that Figure whom we chiefly identify with his preaching, the Messiah. Let us have patience; it is not time for him; but the following is his connection with the prophet's present doctrines.
One question comes up. In this part of Isaiah's ministry, there’s no sign of the Figure we mainly associate with his preaching, the Messiah. Let’s be patient; it’s not his time yet; however, here’s how he connects with the prophet’s current teachings.
Isaiah's great result at present is the certainty of a remnant. That remnant will require two things—they[90] will require a rallying-point, and they will require a leader. Henceforth Isaiah's prophesying will be bent to one or other of these. The two grand purposes of his word and work will be, for the sake of the remnant, the inviolateness of Zion, and the coming of the Messiah. The former he has, indeed, already intimated (chap. iv.); the latter is now to share with it his hope and eloquence.
Isaiah's main focus right now is the certainty of a remnant. This remnant will need two things—they will need a rallying point, and they will need a leader. From now on, Isaiah's prophecies will revolve around one or the other of these. The two main goals of his words and actions will be, for the sake of the remnant, the protection of Zion and the coming of the Messiah. He has already hinted at the first (chap. iv.); now he will also share his hope and eloquence about the latter.

CHAPTER V.
THE WORLD IN ISAIAH'S DAY AND ISRAEL'S GOD.
735-730 B.C.
735-730 B.C.
Up to this point we have been acquainted with Isaiah as a prophet of general principles, preaching to his countrymen the elements of righteousness and judgement, and tracing the main lines of fate along which their evil conduct was rapidly forcing them. We are now to observe him applying these principles to the executive politics of the time, and following Judah's conduct to the issues he had predicted for it in the world outside herself. Hitherto he has been concerned with the inner morals of Jewish society; he is now to engage himself with the effect of these on the fortunes of the Jewish State. In his seventh chapter Isaiah begins that career of practical statesmanship, which not only made him "the greatest political power in Israel since David," but placed him, far above his importance to his own people, upon a position of influence over all ages. To this eminence Isaiah was raised, as we shall see, by two things. First, there was the occasion of his times, for he lived at a juncture at which the vision of the World, as distinguished from the Nation, opened to his people's eyes. Second, he had the faith which enabled him to realize the government of the World by the One God, whom he has already beheld exalted[92] and sovereign within the Nation. In the Nation we have seen Isaiah led to emphasize very absolutely the righteousness of God; applying this to the whole World, he is now to speak as the prophet of what we call Providence. He has seen Jehovah ruling in righteousness in Judah; he is now to take possession of the nations of the World in Jehovah's name. But we mistake Isaiah if we think it is any abstract doctrine of providence which he is about to inculcate. For him God's providence has in the meantime but one end: the preservation of a remnant of the holy people. Afterwards we shall find him expecting besides, the conversion of the whole World to faith in Israel's God.
Up to this point, we've come to know Isaiah as a prophet of general principles, preaching to his fellow countrymen about the basics of righteousness and judgment, and outlining the main pathways of destiny that their harmful actions were quickly leading them down. Now, we're going to see him apply these principles to the political situation of his time, and track Judah's behavior to the outcomes he predicted for them in the world beyond. Until now, he has focused on the inner morals of Jewish society; he is now going to engage with how these morals impact the fortunes of the Jewish State. In his seventh chapter, Isaiah begins a practical career in statesmanship, which not only made him "the greatest political power in Israel since David," but also elevated him to a level of influence that has resonated through all ages. Isaiah is raised to this prominence, as we will see, for two reasons. First, he lived during a critical moment when the vision of the World, separate from the Nation, opened up to his people's eyes. Second, he possessed the faith that allowed him to recognize the governance of the World by the One God, whom he already envisioned as exalted and sovereign within the Nation. In his focus on the Nation, Isaiah has strongly emphasized God's righteousness; now, as he applies this to the entire World, he speaks as the prophet of what we refer to as Providence. He has witnessed Jehovah ruling in righteousness in Judah; now, he is set to claim the nations of the World in Jehovah's name. However, we misunderstand Isaiah if we think he is teaching any abstract doctrine of providence. For him, God's providence ultimately has one purpose: the preservation of a remnant of the holy people. Later, we will find him also anticipating the conversion of the entire World to faith in Israel's God.
The World in Isaiah's day was practically Western Asia. History had not long dawned upon Europe; over Western Asia it was still noon. Draw a line from the Caspian to the mouth of the Persian Gulf; between that line and another crossing the Levant to the west of Cyprus, and continuing along the Libyan border of Egypt, lay the highest forms of religion and civilisation which our race had by that period achieved. This was the World on which Isaiah looked out from Jerusalem, the furthest borders of which he has described in his prophecies, and in the political history of which he illustrated his great principles. How was it composed?
The world in Isaiah's time was essentially Western Asia. History had only recently begun to unfold in Europe; meanwhile, it was still at its peak in Western Asia. If you were to draw a line from the Caspian Sea to the mouth of the Persian Gulf, and then another line crossing the Levant just west of Cyprus and continuing along the Libyan border of Egypt, you would find the most advanced forms of religion and civilization that our race had achieved by that time. This was the world Isaiah observed from Jerusalem, the farthest reaches of which he described in his prophecies, and in the political history of which he exemplified his key principles. What made up this world?
There were, first of all, at either end of it, north-east and south-west, the two great empires of Assyria and Egypt, in many respects wonderful counterparts of each other. No one will understand the history of Palestine, who has not grasped its geographical position relative to these similar empires. Syria, shut up between the Mediterranean sea and the Arabian desert, has its outlets north and south into two great river-plains, each of them ending in a delta. Territories of that kind exert a[93] double force on the world with which they are connected, now drawing across their boundaries the hungry races of neighbouring highlands and deserts, and again sending them forth, compact and resistless armies. This double action summarises the histories of both Egypt and Assyria from the earliest times to the period which we are now treating, and was the cause of the constant circulation, by which, as the Bible bears witness, the life of Syria was stirred from the Tower of Babel downwards. Mesopotamia and the Nile valley drew races as beggars to their rich pasture grounds, only to send them forth in subsequent centuries as conquerors. The century of Isaiah fell in a period of forward movement. Assyria and Egypt were afraid to leave each other in peace; and the wealth of Phœnicia, grown large enough to excite their cupidity, lay between them. In each of these empires, however, there was something to hamper this aggressive impulse. Neither Assyria nor Egypt was a homogeneous State. The valleys of the Euphrates and the Nile were, each of them the home of two nations. Beside Assyria lay Babylonia, once Assyria's mistress, and now of all the Assyrian provinces by far the hardest to hold in subjection, although it lay the nearest to home. In Isaiah's time, when an Assyrian monarch is unable to come into Palestine, Babylon is generally the reason; and it is by intriguing with Babylon that a king of Judah attempts to keep Assyria away from his own neighbourhood. But Babylon only delayed the Assyrian conquest. In Egypt, on the other hand, power was more equally balanced between the hardier people up the Nile and the wealthier people down the Nile—between the Ethiopians and the Egyptians proper. It was the repeated and undecisive contests between these two[94] during the whole of Isaiah's day, which kept Egypt from being an effective force in the politics of Western Asia. In Isaiah's day no Egyptian army advanced more than a few leagues beyond its own frontier.
There were, first of all, at either end of it, northeast and southwest, the two great empires of Assyria and Egypt, which were, in many ways, remarkable counterparts of each other. No one can truly understand the history of Palestine without recognizing its geographical position relative to these similar empires. Syria, enclosed by the Mediterranean Sea and the Arabian Desert, has its outlets to the north and south into two vast river plains, each of which ends in a delta. Territories like these exert a[93] dual influence on the world with which they connect, sometimes drawing in the hungry tribes from the neighboring highlands and deserts, and at other times sending them out as organized and unstoppable armies. This dual action encapsulates the histories of both Egypt and Assyria from their earliest days up until the period we are discussing, causing the constant movement that, as the Bible shows, stirred the life of Syria from the Tower of Babel onwards. Mesopotamia and the Nile Valley attracted various peoples like beggars to their rich lands, only to send them out in the following centuries as conquerors. The century of Isaiah coincided with a time of progress. Assyria and Egypt were reluctant to leave each other in peace; and the wealth of Phoenicia, which had grown large enough to spark their greed, lay in between them. However, both empires faced obstacles to this aggressive drive. Neither Assyria nor Egypt was a unified state. The valleys of the Euphrates and the Nile each held two nations. Next to Assyria lay Babylonia, once its ruler and now the most challenging of all Assyrian provinces to control, even though it was the closest to home. In Isaiah's time, when an Assyrian king could not enter Palestine, Babylon was usually the reason. A king of Judah attempted to fend off Assyria from his region by negotiating with Babylon. But Babylon only postponed the Assyrian conquest. In Egypt, on the other hand, power was more evenly distributed between the tougher people upriver and the wealthier people downriver—between the Ethiopians and the Egyptians themselves. The ongoing and inconclusive battles between these two[94] throughout Isaiah's time prevented Egypt from becoming an effective player in the politics of Western Asia. During Isaiah's time, no Egyptian army advanced more than a few leagues past its own border.
Next in this world of Western Asia come the Phœnicians. We may say that they connected Egypt and Assyria, for although Phœnicia proper meant only the hundred and fifty miles of coast between Carmel and the bay of Antioch, the Phœnicians had large colonies on the delta of the Nile and trading posts upon the Euphrates. They were gathered into independent but more or less confederate cities, the chief of them Tyre and Sidon; which, while they attempted the offensive only in trade, were by their wealth and maritime advantages capable of offering at once a stronger attraction and a more stubborn resistance to the Assyrian arms, than any other power of the time. Between Phœnicia proper and the mouths of the Nile, the coast was held by groups of Philistine cities, whose nearness to Egypt rather than their own strength was the source of a frequent audacity against Assyria, and the reason why they appear in the history of this period oftener than any other State as the object of Assyrian campaigns.
Next in this world of Western Asia come the Phoenicians. We can say that they connected Egypt and Assyria, because even though Phoenicia itself referred to just the 150 miles of coast between Carmel and the bay of Antioch, the Phoenicians had large colonies in the Nile delta and trading posts along the Euphrates. They were organized into independent but somewhat allied cities, the main ones being Tyre and Sidon; while they focused mostly on trade, their wealth and maritime advantages allowed them to be both a strong draw and a tough challenge to Assyria's military, more so than any other power of that time. Between Phoenicia and the Nile's mouths, the coast was occupied by groups of Philistine cities, whose proximity to Egypt rather than their own strength gave them a frequent boldness against Assyria, which is why they appear more often than any other state in the history of this period as targets of Assyrian campaigns.
Behind Phœnicia and the Philistines lay a number of inland territories: the sister-States of Judah and Northern Israel, with their cousins Edom, Moab, and Aram or Syria. Of which Judah and Israel were together about the size of Wales; Edom a mountain range the size and shape of Cornwall; Moab, on its north, a broken tableland, about a Devonshire; and Aram, or Syria, a territory round Damascus, of uncertain size, but considerable enough to have resisted Assyria for a hundred and twenty years. Beyond Aram, again, to the north, lay the smaller State of Hamath, in the mouth of the pass[95] between the Lebanons, with nothing from it to the Euphrates. And then, hovering upon the east of these settled States, were a variety of more or less Nomadic Tribes, whose refuges were the vast deserts of which so large a part of Western Asia consists.
Behind Phoenicia and the Philistines were several inland areas: the sister states of Judah and Northern Israel, along with their relatives Edom, Moab, and Aram, or Syria. Judah and Israel together were roughly the size of Wales; Edom was a mountain range similar in size and shape to Cornwall; Moab, to the north, was a rugged plateau about the size of Devon; and Aram, or Syria, was a region around Damascus that had an uncertain size but was large enough to withstand Assyria for one hundred and twenty years. Further north, beyond Aram, was the smaller state of Hamath, at the mouth of the pass between the Lebanon mountains, with no territory extending to the Euphrates. To the east of these settled states were various nomadic tribes, whose homes were in the vast deserts that make up much of Western Asia.
Here was a world, with some of its constituents wedged pretty firmly by mutual pressure, but in the main broken and restless—a political surface that was always changing. The whole was subject to the movements of the two empires at its extremes. One of them could not move without sending a thrill through to the borders of the other. The approximate distances were these:—from Egypt's border to Jerusalem, about one hundred miles; from Jerusalem to Samaria, forty-five; from Samaria to Damascus, one hundred and fifteen; from Damascus to Hamath, one hundred and thirty; and from Hamath to the Euphrates, one hundred; in all from the border of Egypt to the border of Assyria four hundred and ninety English statute miles. The main line of war and traffic, coming up from Egypt, kept the coast to the plain of Esdraelon, which it crossed towards Damascus, travelling by the north of the sea of Galilee, the way of the sea. Northern Israel was bound to fall an early prey to armies, whose easiest path thus traversed her richest provinces. Judah, on the other hand, occupied a position so elevated and apart, that it was likely to be the last that either Assyria or Egypt would achieve in their subjugation of the States between them.
Here was a world where some of its parts were tightly held together by mutual pressure, but mostly it was broken and restless—a political landscape that was constantly changing. The whole area was influenced by the movements of the two empires at its ends. One empire couldn't shift without sending a ripple through to the borders of the other. The distances were roughly these: from Egypt's border to Jerusalem, about one hundred miles; from Jerusalem to Samaria, forty-five; from Samaria to Damascus, one hundred and fifteen; from Damascus to Hamath, one hundred and thirty; and from Hamath to the Euphrates, one hundred; making a total of four hundred and ninety English statute miles from the border of Egypt to the border of Assyria. The main route for war and trade came up from Egypt, following the coast to the plain of Esdraelon, which it crossed towards Damascus, traveling north of the Sea of Galilee, the way of the sea. Northern Israel was likely to be an early target for armies, as their easiest path passed through her wealthiest provinces. Judah, on the other hand, was situated in a high and isolated position, making it more likely to be the last place either Assyria or Egypt would conquer in their efforts to control the states between them.
Thus, then, Western Asia spread itself out in Isaiah's day. Let us take one more rapid glance across it. Assyria to the north, powerful and on the offensive, but hampered by Babylon; Egypt on the south, weakened and in reserve; all the cities and States between turning[96] their faces desperately northwards, but each with an ear bent back for the promises of the laggard southern power, and occasionally supported by its subsidies; Hamath, their advanced guard at the mouth of the pass between the Lebanons, looking out towards the Euphrates; Tyre and Sidon attractive to the Assyrian king, whose policy is ultimately commercial, by their wealth, both they and the Philistine cities obstructing his path by the coast to his great rival of Egypt; Israel bulwarked against Assyria by Hamath and Damascus, but in danger, as soon as they fall, of seeing her richest provinces overrun; Judah unlikely in the general restlessness to retain her hold upon Edom, but within her own borders tolerably secure, neither lying in the Assyrian's path to Egypt, nor wealthy enough to attract him out of it; safe, therefore, in the neutrality which Isaiah ceaselessly urges her to preserve, and in danger of suction into the whirlpool of the approach of the two empires only through the foolish desire of her rulers to secure an utterly unnecessary alliance with the one or the other of them.
Thus, during Isaiah's time, Western Asia was laid out. Let's take one more quick look at it. Assyria to the north was strong and aggressive, but held back by Babylon; Egypt to the south was weak and on standby; all the cities and states in between were desperately looking north, but each was also listening for the promises from the slow-moving southern power, occasionally getting support from its funds. Hamath, stationed at the entrance of the pass between the Lebanon mountains, was watching towards the Euphrates; Tyre and Sidon were appealing to the Assyrian king, whose main focus was trade, due to their wealth, while they and the Philistine cities blocked his route along the coast to his major rival, Egypt; Israel was protected against Assyria by Hamath and Damascus, but could be in danger if those two fell, risking the invasion of her most prosperous regions; Judah was unlikely to keep control over Edom amid the general unrest, but was relatively secure within her own borders, not lying in the Assyrian path to Egypt, nor rich enough to draw his attention away from it; thus, she was safe in the neutrality that Isaiah consistently urged her to maintain, and faced the risk of being pulled into the chaos of the approaching two empires only due to her rulers' foolish desire to secure an entirely unnecessary alliance with one or the other.
For a hundred and twenty years before the advent of Isaiah, the annals of the Assyrian kings record periodical campaigns against the cities of "the land of the west," but these isolated incursions were followed by no permanent results. In 745, however, five years before King Uzziah died, a soldier ascended the throne of Assyria, under the title of Tiglath-pileser II.,[11] who was determined to achieve the conquest of the whole world and its organization as his empire. Where his armies came, it was not simply to chastise or demand tribute,[97] but to annex countries, carry away their populations and exploit their resources. It was no longer kings who were threatened; peoples found themselves in danger of extinction. This terrible purpose of the Assyrian was pursued with vast means and the utmost ferocity. He has been called the Roman of the East, and up to a certain degree we may imagine his policy by remembering all that is familiar to us of its execution by Rome: its relentlessness, impetus and mysterious action from one centre; the discipline, the speed, the strange appearance, of his armies. But there was an Oriental savagery about Assyria, from which Rome was free. The Assyrian kings moved in the power of their brutish and stormy gods—gods that were in the shape of bulls and had the wings as of the tempest. The annals of these kings, in which they describe their campaigns, are full of talk about trampling down their enemies; about showering tempests of clubs upon them, and raining a deluge of arrows; about overwhelming them, and sweeping them off the face of the land, and strewing them like chaff on the sea; about chariots with scythes, and wheels clogged with blood; about great baskets stuffed with the salted heads of their foes. It is a mixture of the Roman and Red Indian.
For 120 years before Isaiah's time, the records of the Assyrian kings show regular attacks on the cities of "the land of the west," but these raids didn’t bring any lasting outcomes. In 745, however, five years before King Uzziah's death, a soldier took the throne of Assyria, named Tiglath-pileser II.,[11] who was determined to conquer the whole world and turn it into his empire. When his armies arrived, it was not just to punish or collect taxes,[97] but to take over countries, remove their populations, and exploit their resources. It wasn’t just kings in danger; entire peoples were at risk of disappearing. This grim goal of the Assyrian was pursued with enormous resources and extreme brutality. He has been referred to as the Roman of the East, and to some extent we can understand his approach by recalling everything we know about Roman tactics: their relentlessness, momentum, and mysterious coordination from a central point; the discipline, speed, and strange appearance of his armies. But Assyria had a level of savagery that Rome did not. The Assyrian kings operated with the might of their fierce and tumultuous gods—gods represented as bulls with tempestuous wings. Their records, detailing their campaigns, are filled with descriptions of crushing their enemies; unleashing storms of clubs upon them, and showering them with arrows; overwhelming and erasing them from the land, scattering them like chaff in the sea; chariots with scythes, and wheels soaked in blood; and large baskets filled with the salted heads of their adversaries. It’s a blend of Roman and Native American brutality.
Picture the effect of the onward movement of such a force upon the imaginations and policies of those little States that clustered round Judah and Israel. Settling their own immemorial feuds, they sought alliance with one another against this common foe. Tribes, that for centuries had stained their borders with one another's blood, came together in unions, the only reason for which was that their common fear had grown stronger than their mutual hate. Now and then a king would be found unwilling to enter such an[98] alliance or eager to withdraw from it, in the hope of securing by his exceptional conduct the favour of the Assyrian, whom he sought further to ingratiate by voluntary tribute. The shifting attitudes of the petty kings towards Assyria bewilder the reader of the Assyrian annals. The foes of one year are the tributaries of the next; the State, that has called for help this campaign, appears as the rebel of that. In 742, Uzziah of Judah is cursed by Tiglath-pileser as an arch-enemy; Samaria and Damascus are recorded as faithful tributaries. Seven years later Ahaz of Judah offers tribute to the Assyrian king, and Damascus and Samaria are invaded by the Assyrian armies. What a world it was, and what politics! A world of petty clans, with no idea of a common humanity, and with no motive for union except fear; politics without a noble thought or long purpose in them, the politics of peoples at bay—the last flicker of dying nationalities,—stumps of smoking firebrands, as Isaiah described two of them.
Imagine the impact of such a force moving forward on the imaginations and policies of the small states surrounding Judah and Israel. Settling their long-standing conflicts, they sought alliances against this common enemy. Tribes that had spent centuries fighting one another came together because their shared fear was stronger than their mutual hatred. Occasionally, a king would refuse to join this alliance or would want to withdraw from it, hoping that his exceptional actions would win the favor of the Assyrian, whom he tried to please with voluntary tribute. The changing attitudes of the minor kings towards Assyria can confuse anyone reading the Assyrian records. One year's enemies become the next year's tributaries; a state that calls for help in one campaign is seen as a rebel in the next. In 742, Uzziah of Judah is condemned by Tiglath-pileser as a major enemy, while Samaria and Damascus are noted as loyal tributaries. Seven years later, Ahaz of Judah pays tribute to the Assyrian king, and Assyrian armies invade Damascus and Samaria. What a world it was, and what a political landscape! A world of small clans, with no sense of common humanity, and with no reason to unite other than fear; politics without any noble thoughts or long-term goals, the desperate politics of people backed into a corner—the last flicker of dying nationalities—stumps of smoking firebrands, as Isaiah described two of them.
When we turn to the little we know of the religions of these tribes, we find nothing to arrest their restlessness or broaden their thoughts. These nations had their religions, and called on their gods, but their gods were made in their own image, their religion was the reflex of their life. Each of them employed, rather than worshipped, its deity. No nation believed in its god except as one among many, with his sovereignty limited to its own territory, and his ability to help it conditioned by the power of the other gods, against whose peoples he was fighting. There was no belief in "Providence," no idea of unity or of progress in history, no place in these religions for the great world-force that was advancing upon their peoples.
When we look at what little we know about the religions of these tribes, we see nothing that calms their restlessness or expands their thinking. These nations had their own beliefs and called upon their gods, but their gods were reflections of themselves; their religion mirrored their lives. Each of them used, rather than truly worshipped, their deity. No nation believed in its god as the one true god, but rather as just one among many, with his authority limited to his own land and his ability to assist dependent on the strength of other gods, whom he was fighting against. There was no belief in "Providence," no concept of unity or progress in history, and no acknowledgment of the greater world force that was approaching their peoples.
[99]From this condemnation we cannot except the people of Jehovah. It is undeniable that the mass of them occupied at this time pretty much the same low religious level as their neighbours. We have already seen (chap. i.) their mean estimate of what God required from themselves; with that corresponded their view of His position towards the world. To the majority of the Israelites their God was but one out of many, with His own battles to fight and have fought for Him, a Patron sometimes to be ashamed of, and by no means a Saviour in whom to place an absolute trust. When Ahaz is beaten by Syria, he says: Because the gods of the kings of Syria helped them, therefore will I sacrifice to them, that they may help me (2 Chron. xxviii. 23). Religion to Ahaz was only another kind of diplomacy. He was not a fanatic, but a diplomat, who made his son to pass through the fire to Moloch, and burnt incense in the high places and on the hills, and under every green tree. He was more a political than a religious eclectic, who brought back the pattern of the Damascus altar to Jerusalem. The Temple, in which Isaiah saw the Lord high and lifted up, became under Ahaz, and by the help of the priesthood, the shelter of various idols; in every corner of Jerusalem altars were erected to other gods. This religious hospitality was the outcome neither of imagination nor of liberal thought; it was prompted only by political fear. Ahaz has been mistaken in the same way as Charles I. was—for a bigot, and one who subjected the welfare of his kingdom to a superstitious regard for religion. But beneath the cloak of religious scrupulousness and false reverence,[12] there was in Ahaz the same selfish fear for the safety of his crown and his[100] dynasty, as those who best knew the English monarch tell us, was the real cause of his ceaseless intrigue and stupid obstinacy.
[99]We cannot exclude the people of Jehovah from this condemnation. It’s clear that most of them were at a similar low religious level as their neighbors at that time. We've already seen (chap. i.) their poor understanding of what God expected from them, which matched their view of His role in the world. To most of the Israelites, their God was just one of many, fighting His own battles, sometimes a source of embarrassment, and certainly not a Saviour they could fully trust. When Ahaz was defeated by Syria, he said: Because the gods of the kings of Syria helped them, therefore will I sacrifice to them, that they may help me (2 Chron. xxviii. 23). For Ahaz, religion was simply another form of diplomacy. He wasn’t a fanatic, but a diplomat who made his son pass through fire to Moloch, burned incense at high places, on hills, and under every green tree. He was more of a political than a religious eclectic, bringing the design of the Damascus altar to Jerusalem. The Temple, where Isaiah saw the Lord high and lifted up, became, under Ahaz and with the help of the priesthood, a shelter for various idols; altars to other gods were set up in every corner of Jerusalem. This religious openness wasn’t born out of imagination or liberal thought; it was driven purely by political fear. Ahaz was mistaken, much like Charles I, for a bigot, someone who let his kingdom's welfare suffer due to a superstitious approach to religion. But beneath the appearance of religious concern and false respect,[12] Ahaz shared the same selfish fear for the safety of his crown and dynasty, which those who knew the English monarch well say was the real reason for his constant intrigue and foolish stubbornness. [100]
Now that we have surveyed this world, its politics and its religion, we can estimate the strength and originality of the Hebrew prophets. Where others saw the conflicts of nations, aided by deities as doubtfully matched as themselves, they perceived all things working together by the will of one supreme God and serving His ends of righteousness. It would be wrong to say, that before the eighth century the Hebrew conception of God had been simply that of a national deity, for this would be to ignore the remarkable emphasis placed by the Hebrews from very early times upon Jehovah's righteousness. But till the eighth century the horizon of the Hebrew mind had been the border of their territory; the historical theatre on which it saw God working was the national life. Now, however, the Hebrews were drawn into the world; they felt movements of which their own history was but an eddy; they saw the advance of forces against which their own armies, though inspired by Jehovah, had no chance of material success. The perspective was entirely changed; their native land took to most of them the aspect of a petty and worthless province, their God the rank of a mere provincial deity; they refused the waters of Shiloah, that go softly, and rejoiced in the glory of the king of Assyria, the king of the great River and the hosts that moved with the strength of its floods. It was at this moment that the prophets of Israel performed their supreme religious service. While Ahaz and the mass of the people illustrated the impotence of the popular religion, by admitting to an equal place in the national temple the gods of their victorious foes,[101] the prophets boldly took possession of the whole world in the name of Jehovah of hosts, and exalted Him to the throne of the supreme Providence. Now they could do this only by emphasizing and developing the element of righteousness in the old conception of Him. This attribute of Jehovah took absolute possession of the prophets; and in the strength of its inspiration they were enabled, at a time when it would have been the sheerest folly to promise Israel victory against a foe like Assyria, to asseverate that even that supreme world-power was in the hand of Jehovah, and that He must be trusted to lead up all the movements of which the Assyrians were the main force to the ends He had so plainly revealed to His chosen Israel. Even before Isaiah's time such principles had been proclaimed by Amos and Hosea, but it was Isaiah, who both gave to them their loftiest expression, and applied them with the utmost detail and persistence to the practical politics of Judah. We have seen him, in the preliminary stages of his ministry under Uzziah and Jotham, reaching most exalted convictions of the righteousness of Jehovah, as contrasted with the people's view of their God's "nationalism." But we are now to follow him boldly applying this faith—won within the life of Judah, won, as he tells us, by the personal inspiration of Judah's God—to the problems and movements of the whole world as they bear upon Israel's fate. The God, who is supreme in Judah through righteousness, cannot but be supreme everywhere else, for there is nothing in the world higher than righteousness. Isaiah's faith in a Divine Providence is a close corollary to his faith in Jehovah's righteousness; and of one part of that Providence he had already received conviction—[102]A remnant shall remain. Ahaz may crowd Jerusalem with foreign altars and idols, so as to be able to say: "We have with us, on our side, Moloch and Chemosh and Rimmon and the gods of Damascus and Assyria." Isaiah, in the face of this folly, lifts up his simple gospel: "Immanu-El. We have with us, in our own Jehovah of hosts, El, the one supreme God, Ruler of heaven and earth."
Now that we've explored this world, including its politics and religion, we can assess the strength and originality of the Hebrew prophets. While others recognized the conflicts between nations, assisted by gods that were just as questionable as they were, the prophets understood that everything was working together under the will of one supreme God to fulfill His purpose of righteousness. It's inaccurate to claim that before the eighth century, the Hebrew view of God was merely that of a national deity; this overlooks the significant emphasis the Hebrews placed on Jehovah's righteousness from very early on. However, until the eighth century, the Hebrew perspective was limited to the borders of their territory; the historical stage on which they saw God acting was within their national life. This changed, though, as the Hebrews became aware of broader movements that made their own history seem like just a small ripple; they observed forces advancing against which their own armies, despite being inspired by Jehovah, stood no chance of material success. The view shifted dramatically; their homeland began to seem to many of them like a small and insignificant province, and their God took on the stature of a mere local deity. They rejected the gentle streams of Shiloah and instead celebrated the glory of the king of Assyria, the ruler of the great River and the armies that moved with its powerful currents. It was during this time that the prophets of Israel fulfilled their greatest religious role. While Ahaz and much of the populace showed the weakness of popular religion by allowing the gods of their conquering enemies to hold equal status in the national temple, the prophets courageously claimed the entire world in the name of Jehovah of hosts, elevating Him to the position of supreme Providence. They could only do this by highlighting and expanding the concept of righteousness in their understanding of Him. This attribute of Jehovah completely consumed the prophets, and inspired by it, they boldly asserted, at a time when promising victory against a foe like Assyria seemed utterly foolish, that even that great world power was under Jehovah's control and that He must be trusted to guide all the movements where the Assyrians were the primary force towards the purposes He had clearly revealed to His chosen people. Even before Isaiah's time, such ideas had been expressed by Amos and Hosea, but it was Isaiah who articulated them most powerfully and applied them meticulously to the practical politics of Judah. We have seen him, in the early stages of his ministry under Uzziah and Jotham, arriving at profound beliefs regarding Jehovah's righteousness, contrasting it with the people's view of their God's "nationalism." Now, we will follow him as he boldly applies this faith—gained through the life of Judah, which he tells us was acquired by the personal inspiration of Judah's God—to the challenges and forces affecting the fate of Israel globally. The God who is supreme in Judah through righteousness must also be supreme elsewhere, for nothing in the world is higher than righteousness. Isaiah's belief in Divine Providence closely relates to his faith in Jehovah's righteousness; he has already come to believe in one aspect of that Providence—[102]A remnant shall remain. Ahaz might fill Jerusalem with foreign altars and idols, saying, "We have Moloch, Chemosh, Rimmon, and the gods of Damascus and Assyria on our side." In response to this folly, Isaiah raises his simple message: "Immanu-El. We have Jehovah of hosts, El, the one supreme God, Ruler of heaven and earth, on our side."
CHAPTER VI.
KING AND MESSIAH; PEOPLE AND CHURCH.
Isaiah vii., viii., ix. 1-8.
Isaiah chapters 7, 8, 9:1-8.
735-732 B.C.
735-732 B.C.
This section of the book of Isaiah (vii.-ix. 7) consists of a number of separate prophecies uttered during a period of at least three years: 735-732 B.C. By 735 Ahaz had ascended the throne; Tiglath-pileser had been occupied in the far east for two years. Taking advantage of the weakness of the former and the distance of the latter, Rezin, king of Damascus, and Pekah, king of Samaria, planned an invasion of Judah. It was a venture they would not have dared had Uzziah been alive. While Rezin marched down the east of the Jordan and overturned the Jewish supremacy in Edom, Pekah threw himself into Judah, defeated the armies of Ahaz in one great battle, and besieged Jerusalem, with the object of deposing Ahaz and setting a Syrian, Ben-Tabeel, in his stead. Simultaneously the Philistines attacked Judah from the south-west. The motive of the confederates was in all probability anger with Ahaz for refusing to enter with them into a Pan-Syrian alliance against Assyria. In his distress Ahaz appealed to Tiglath-pileser, and the Assyrian swiftly responded. In 734—it must have been less than a year since Ahaz was attacked—the hosts of the north had overrun[104] Samaria and swept as far south as the cities of the Philistines. Then, withdrawing his troops again, Tiglath-pileser left Hoshea as his vassal on Pekah's throne, and sending the population of Israel east of the Jordan into distant captivity, completed a two years' siege of Damascus (734-732) by its capture. At Damascus Ahaz met the conqueror, and having paid him tribute, took out a further policy of insurance in the altar-pattern, which he brought back with him to Jerusalem. Such were the three years, whose rapid changes unfolded themselves in parallel with these prophecies of Isaiah. The details are not given by the prophet, but we must keep in touch with them while we listen to him. Especially must we remember their central point, the decision of Ahaz to call in the help of Assyria, a decision which affected the whole course of politics for the next thirty years. Some of the oracles of this section were plainly delivered by Isaiah before that event, and simply seek to inspire Ahaz with a courage which should feel Assyrian help to be needless; others, again, imply that Ahaz has already called in the Assyrian: they taunt him with hankering after foreign strength, and depict the woes which the Assyrian will bring upon the land; while others (for example, the passage ix. 1-7) mean that the Assyrian has already come, and that the Galilean provinces of Israel have been depopulated, and promise a Deliverer. If we do not keep in mind the decision of Ahaz, we shall not understand these seemingly contradictory utterances, which it thoroughly explains. Let us now begin at the beginning of chapter vii. It opens with a bare statement, by way of title, of the invasion of Judah and the futile result; and then proceeds to tell us how Isaiah acted from the first rumour of the confederacy onward.
This section of the book of Isaiah (vii.-ix. 7) includes several separate prophecies given over a period of at least three years: 735-732 B.C. By 735, Ahaz had taken the throne, while Tiglath-pileser had been engaged in the far east for two years. Taking advantage of the former's weakness and the latter's distance, Rezin, the king of Damascus, and Pekah, the king of Samaria, planned to invade Judah. They wouldn't have dared to do this if Uzziah had still been alive. While Rezin moved down the east of the Jordan and toppled Jewish authority in Edom, Pekah launched an attack in Judah, defeated Ahaz's armies in a major battle, and besieged Jerusalem, aiming to remove Ahaz and replace him with a Syrian, Ben-Tabeel. At the same time, the Philistines attacked Judah from the southwest. The confederates were likely motivated by anger towards Ahaz for refusing to join them in a Pan-Syrian alliance against Assyria. In his desperation, Ahaz reached out to Tiglath-pileser, who quickly responded. In 734—less than a year after Ahaz was first attacked—northern forces had invaded Samaria and advanced as far south as the cities of the Philistines. Then, pulling back his troops, Tiglath-pileser left Hoshea as his vassal on Pekah's throne, sending the population of Israel east of the Jordan into distant captivity, and completed a two-year siege of Damascus (734-732) with its capture. At Damascus, Ahaz met the conqueror, paid him tribute, and brought back an altar-pattern as an additional measure of insurance to Jerusalem. Such were the three years, marked by rapid changes alongside Isaiah's prophecies. The prophet doesn't provide the details, but we need to stay aware of them as we listen to him. We especially need to keep in mind the central point: Ahaz's decision to seek help from Assyria, a choice that impacted the entire political landscape for the next thirty years. Some of the oracles in this section were clearly given by Isaiah before that decision, aiming to inspire Ahaz with the courage to see Assyrian help as unnecessary; others imply that Ahaz has already sought Assyrian aid, criticizing him for relying on foreign power and describing the troubles the Assyrian will bring to the land; while others (like the passage ix. 1-7) indicate that the Assyrian has already arrived, leading to the depopulation of the Galilean provinces of Israel, and promise a Deliverer. If we don't keep Ahaz's decision in mind, we won't grasp these seemingly contradictory statements, which it clearly clarifies. Now, let's start at the beginning of chapter vii, which begins with a simple title stating the invasion of Judah and its futile outcome, and then details how Isaiah responded from the first news of the confederacy onward.
[105]I. The King (chap. vii.).
I. The King (chap. 7).
And it came to pass in the days of Ahaz, the son of Jotham, the son of Uzziah, king of Judah, that Rezin, the king of Syria, and Pekah, the son of Remaliah, king of Israel, went up to Jerusalem to war against it, but could not prevail against it. This is a summary of the whole adventure and issue of the war, given by way of introduction. The narrative proper begins in verse 2, with the effect of the first news of the league upon Ahaz and his people. Their hearts were moved, like the trees of the forest before the wind. The league was aimed so evidently against the two things most essential to the national existence and the honour of Jehovah; the dynasty of David, namely, and the inviolability of Jerusalem. Judah had frequently before suffered the loss of her territory; never till now were the throne and city of David in actual peril. But that, which bent both king and people by its novel terror, was the test Isaiah expected for the prophecies he had already uttered. Taking with him, as a summary of them, his boy with the name Shear-Jashub—A-remnant-shall-return—Isaiah faced Ahaz and his court in the midst of their preparation for the siege. They were examining—but more in panic than in prudence—the water supply of the city, when Isaiah delivered to them a message from the Lord, which may be paraphrased as follows: Take heed and be quiet, keep your eyes open and your heart still; fear not, neither be faint-hearted, for the fierce anger of Rezin and Remaliah's son. They have no power to set you on fire. They are but stumps of expiring firebrands, almost burnt out. While you wisely look after your water supply, do so in hope. This purpose of deposing you is vain. Thus saith the Lord Jehovah: It shall not stand, neither shall it come to pass. Of whom are you afraid? Look those[106] foes of yours in the face. The head of Syria is Damascus, and Damascus' head is Rezin: is he worth fearing? The head of Ephraim is Samaria, and Samaria's head is Remaliah's son: is he worth fearing? Within a few years they will certainly be destroyed. But whatever estimate you make of your foes, whatever their future may be, for yourself have faith in God; for you that is the essential thing. If ye will not believe, surely ye shall not be established.[13]
During the reign of Ahaz, son of Jotham, son of Uzziah, king of Judah, Rezin, king of Syria, and Pekah, son of Remaliah, king of Israel, came up to Jerusalem to fight against it, but they couldn't overpower it. This serves as a summary of the entire conflict and its outcome, presented as an introduction. The main narrative starts in verse 2, detailing the impact of the initial news of the alliance on Ahaz and his people. Their hearts were shaken like trees swaying in the wind. The alliance was clearly targeting the two most crucial aspects of the nation's survival and the honor of God: the Davidic line and the safety of Jerusalem. Judah had previously lost territory; however, it was the first time the throne and the city of David were genuinely at risk. What frightened both the king and the people the most was the challenge of a test that Isaiah anticipated based on the prophecies he had already proclaimed. Bringing along his son named Shear-Jashub—A-remnant-shall-return—Isaiah confronted Ahaz and his court during their preparations for the siege. They were inspecting the city’s water supply more out of fear than caution when Isaiah relayed a message from the Lord, which can be summarized as follows: Stay calm and don’t panic, keep your eyes open and your heart steady; don’t be afraid or lose heart because of the fierce anger of Rezin and Remaliah's son. They don’t have the power to harm you. They are just the stumps of dying firebrands, almost extinguished. While you carefully consider your water supply, do so with hope. Their plan to overthrow you is futile. This is what the Lord God says: It will not succeed, nor will it happen. Who are you afraid of? Look at those[106] enemies straight in the eye. The head of Syria is Damascus, and the head of Damascus is Rezin: is he really worth fearing? The head of Ephraim is Samaria, and the head of Samaria is Remaliah's son: is he really worth fearing? In just a few years, they will surely be destroyed. But however you evaluate your enemies, regardless of their future, put your trust in God; that is what truly matters for you. If you do not believe, you will not be secure.[13]
This paraphrase seeks to bring out the meaning of a passage confessedly obscure. It seems as if we had only bits of Isaiah's speech to Ahaz and must supply the gaps. No one need hesitate, however, to recognize the conspicuous personal qualities—the combination of political sagacity with religious fear, of common-sense and courage rooted in faith. In a word, this is what Isaiah will say to the king, clever in his alliances, religious and secular, and busy about his material defences: "Take unto you the shield of faith. You have lost your head among all these things. Hold it up like a man behind that shield; take a rational view of affairs. Rate your enemies at their proper value. But for this you must believe in God. Faith in Him is the essential condition of a calm mind and a rational appreciation of affairs."
This paraphrase aims to clarify the meaning of a passage that is admittedly unclear. It seems like we only have snippets of Isaiah's conversation with Ahaz and need to fill in the blanks. However, no one should hesitate to see the notable personal qualities present—an effective mix of political insight and religious reverence, along with common sense and courage grounded in faith. In short, this is what Isaiah will say to the king, who is smart in his political alliances, both religious and secular, and focused on his material defenses: "Take up the shield of faith. You've lost your focus amidst all these matters. Hold it up like a man behind that shield; take a sensible view of things. Assess your enemies accurately. But for this, you need to believe in God. Faith in Him is the key to maintaining a calm mind and a clear understanding of the situation."
It is, no doubt, difficult for us to realize that the truth which Isaiah thus enforced on King Ahaz—the government of the world and human history by one supreme God—was ever a truth of which the race stood in ignorance. A generation like ours cannot be expected to put its mind in the attitude of those of Isaiah's[107] contemporaries who believed in the real existence of many gods with limited sovereignties. To us, who are full of the instincts of Divine Providence and of the presence in history of law and progress, it is extremely hard even to admit the fact—far less fully to realize what it means—that our race had ever to receive these truths as fresh additions to their stock of intellectual ideas. Yet, without prejudice to the claims of earlier prophets, this may be confidently affirmed: that Isaiah where we now meet him stood on one side believing in one supreme God, Lord of heaven and earth, and his generation stood on the other side, believing that there were many gods. Isaiah, however, does not pose as the discoverer of the truth he preaches; he does not present it as a new revelation, nor put it in a formula. He takes it for granted, and proceeds to bring its moral influence to bear. He will infect men with his own utter conviction of it, in order that he may strengthen their character and guide them by paths of safety. His speech to Ahaz is an exhibition of the moral and rational effects of believing in Providence. Ahaz is a sample of the character polytheism produced; the state of mind and heart to which Isaiah exhorts him is that induced by belief in one righteous and almighty God. We can make the contrast clear to ourselves by a very definite figure.
It’s definitely hard for us to grasp that the truth Isaiah emphasized to King Ahaz—the idea that one supreme God governs the world and human history—was once something humanity didn't understand. A generation like ours can't be expected to think like Isaiah's contemporaries, who believed in the actual existence of many gods with limited powers. For us, filled with the instincts of Divine Providence and the presence of law and progress in history, it's extremely difficult to even acknowledge—let alone fully grasp—the fact that our ancestors had to accept these truths as new additions to their body of knowledge. Yet, without dismissing the claims of earlier prophets, it can be confidently stated: where we find Isaiah, he believes in one supreme God, the Lord of heaven and earth, while his generation believes in many gods. However, Isaiah doesn’t act like he’s discovering the truth he preaches; he doesn't treat it as a new revelation or put it into a formula. He takes it as a given and proceeds to highlight its moral influence. He aims to instill in people his own deep conviction of it, so he can strengthen their character and guide them safely. His message to Ahaz demonstrates the moral and rational effects of believing in Providence. Ahaz exemplifies the character shaped by polytheism; the mindset and heart Isaiah encourages him to adopt are those inspired by faith in one righteous and all-powerful God. We can clarify this contrast with a very clear example.
The difference, which is made to the character and habits of men if the country they live in has a powerful government or not, is well known. If there be no such central authority, it is a case of every man's hand against his neighbour. Men walk armed to the teeth. A constant attitude of fear and suspicion warps the whole nature. The passions are excited and magnified; the intelligence and judgement are dwarfed.[108] Just the same after its kind is life to the man or tribe, who believe, that the world in which they dwell and the life they share with others have no central authority. They walk armed with prejudices, superstitions and selfishnesses. They create, like Ahaz, their own providences, and still, like him, feel insecure. Everything is exaggerated by them; in each evil there lurks to their imagination unlimited hostility. They are without breadth of view or length of patience. But let men believe that life has a central authority, that God is supreme, and they will fling their prejudices and superstitions to the winds, now no more needed than the antiquated fortresses and weapons by which our forefathers, in days when the government was weak, were forced to defend their private interests. When we know that God reigns, how quiet and free it makes us! When things and men are part of His scheme and working out His ends, when we understand that they are not monsters but ministers, how reasonably we can look at them! Were we afraid of Syria and Ephraim? Why, the head of Syria is this fellow Rezin, the head of Ephraim this son of Remaliah! They cannot last long; God's engine stands behind to smite them. By the reasonable government of God, let us be reasonable! Let us take heed and be quiet. Have faith in God, and to faith will come her proper consequent of commonsense.
The difference in the character and habits of people, depending on whether their country has a strong government or not, is well understood. If there's no central authority, it's a situation of everyone against their neighbor. People arm themselves to the teeth. A constant sense of fear and suspicion distorts their entire nature. Their passions are stirred up and amplified; their judgment and intelligence are stunted.[108] Similarly, life for individuals or groups who believe that the world they live in lacks a central authority is just as chaotic. They carry around their own prejudices, superstitions, and selfishness. Like Ahaz, they create their own ways to manage life and still, like him, feel insecure. Everything is blown out of proportion; in every problem, they imagine limitless hostility. They lack broad perspective and patience. But when people believe that life has a central authority, that God is supreme, they will cast aside their prejudices and superstitions, which are now as unnecessary as the outdated fortresses and weapons our ancestors used to defend their interests when the government was weak. When we know that God rules, it brings us peace and freedom! When everything and everyone is part of His plan, and when we realize they are not threats but servants, we can view them rationally. Were we worried about Syria and Ephraim? Well, the head of Syria is this guy Rezin, and the head of Ephraim is this son of Remaliah! They won't last long; God's power is behind them to bring them down. Through God's reasonable governance, let us be rational! Let us pay attention and remain calm. Have faith in God, and with that faith will come the common sense that follows.
For the higher a man looks, the farther he sees: to us that is the practical lesson of these first nine verses of the seventh chapter. The very gesture of faith bestows upon the mind a breadth of view. The man, who lifts his face to God in heaven, is he whose eyes sweep simultaneously the farthest prospect of earth, and bring to him a sense of the proportion of things. Ahaz, facing his nearest enemies, does not see over their[109] heads, and in his consternation at their appearance prepares to embark upon any policy that suggests itself, even though it be so rash as the summoning of the Assyrian. Isaiah, on the other hand, with his vision fixed on God as the Governor of the world, is enabled to overlook the dust that darkens Judah's frontier, to see behind it the inevitable advance of the Assyrians, and to be assured that, whether Ahaz calls them to his quarrel or no, they will very soon of their own motion overwhelm both of his enemies. From these two smoking firebrands there is then no real danger. But from the Assyrian, if once Judah entangle herself in his toils, there is the most extreme danger. Isaiah's advice is therefore not mere religious quietism; it is prudent policy. It is the best political advice that could have been offered at that crisis, as we have already been able to gather from a survey of the geographical and political dispositions of Western Asia,[14] apart altogether from religious considerations. But to Isaiah the calmness requisite for this sagacity sprang from his faith. Mr. Bagehot might have appealed to Isaiah's whole policy in illustration of what he has so well described as the military and political benefits of religion. Monotheism is of advantage to men not only by reason of "the high concentration of steady feeling" which it produces, but also for the mental calmness and sagacity, which surely spring from a pure and vivid conviction that the Lord reigneth.[15]
For the higher a person looks, the farther they can see: that’s the practical lesson from the first nine verses of the seventh chapter. The very act of faith gives the mind a broader perspective. The person who lifts their face to God in heaven is the one whose eyes can simultaneously sweep the farthest reaches of the earth, giving them a sense of the bigger picture. Ahaz, facing his closest enemies, doesn’t see beyond them, and in his panic at their presence, he gets ready to follow any course of action that comes to mind, even if it’s as reckless as calling in the Assyrians. On the other hand, Isaiah, with his focus on God as the ruler of the world, can look past the chaos along Judah's border to see the looming threat of the Assyrians, and he knows that whether Ahaz asks for their help or not, they will soon overwhelm both of his foes on their own. There’s no real danger from these two smoking firebrands. But the Assyrian poses a great risk if Judah gets caught in his trap. Therefore, Isaiah's advice isn't just wishful thinking; it's smart policy. It’s the best political guidance that could have been given during that critical moment, as we've already seen from examining the geographical and political situation in Western Asia,[14] aside from any religious thoughts. But for Isaiah, the calmness needed for such wisdom came from his faith. Mr. Bagehot could have used Isaiah’s entire approach as an example of the military and political advantages of religion. Monotheism benefits people not only because of "the high concentration of steady feeling" it creates but also because of the mental calmness and insight that surely come from a clear and strong belief that the Lord reigns.[15]
One other thing it is well we should emphasize, before we pass from Isaiah's speech to Ahaz. Nothing can be plainer than that Isaiah, though advocating so absolutely a quiescent belief in God, is no fatalist. Now other prophets there have been, insisting just as absolutely as Isaiah upon resignation to God the supreme, and the evident practical effect of their doctrine of the Divine sovereignty has been to make their followers, not shrewd political observers, but blind and apathetic fatalists. The difference between them and Isaiah has lain in the kind of character, which they and he have respectively attributed to the Deity, before exalting Him to the throne of absolute power and resigning themselves to His will. Isaiah, though as disciplined a believer in God's sovereignty and man's duty of obedience as any prophet that ever preached these doctrines, was preserved from the fatalism to which they so often lead by the conviction he had previously received of God's righteousness. Fatalism means resignation to fate, and fate means an omnipotence either without character, or (which is the same thing) of whose character we are ignorant. Fate is God minus character, and fatalism is the characterless condition to which belief in such a God reduces man. History presents it to our view amid the most[111] diverse surroundings. The Greek mind, so free and sunny, was bewildered and benumbed by belief in an inscrutable Nemesis. In the East how frequently is a temper of apathy or despair bred in men, to whom God is nothing but a despot! Even within Christianity we have had fanatics, so inordinately possessed with belief in God's sovereignty of election, to the exclusion of all other Divine truths, as to profess themselves, with impious audacity, willing to be damned for His glory. Such instances are enough to prove to us the extreme danger of making the sovereignty of God the first article of our creed. It is not safe for men to exalt a deity to the throne of the supreme providence, till they are certified of his character. The vision of mere power intoxicates and brutalizes, no less when it is hallowed by the name of religion, than when, as in modern materialism, it is blindly interpreted as physical force. Only the people who have first learned to know their Deity intimately in the private matters of life, where heart touches heart, and the delicate arguments of conscience are not overborne by the presence of vast natural forces or the intricate movements of the world's history, can be trusted afterwards to enter these larger theatres of religion, without risk of losing their faith, their sensibility or their conscience.
One other thing we should stress before moving from Isaiah's speech to Ahaz is this: It's clear that Isaiah, while promoting a peaceful belief in God, is not a fatalist. Other prophets have insisted just as strongly as Isaiah on submitting to God as the supreme being, and the practical outcome of their teaching on divine sovereignty has often made their followers blind and indifferent fatalists rather than keen political observers. The difference between them and Isaiah lies in the kind of character they each attributed to God before elevating Him to absolute power and resigning to His will. Isaiah, while as committed a believer in God's sovereignty and man's duty to obey as any prophet, avoided the fatalism that often accompanies such beliefs because of his prior conviction of God's righteousness. Fatalism means resignation to fate, and fate represents an omnipotence that lacks character or (which is the same) whose character we do not understand. Fate is God minus character, and fatalism is the lack of character that belief in such a God imposes on humanity. History shows us this in various contexts. The Greek mind, so free and bright, was confused and paralyzed by belief in a mysterious Nemesis. In the East, how often does a sense of apathy or despair arise in people who see God only as a tyrant! Even within Christianity, there have been fanatics who were so overwhelmingly fixated on God's sovereignty in election, ignoring other divine truths, that they audaciously claimed they were willing to be damned for His glory. Such examples highlight the significant danger of making God's sovereignty the first principle of our beliefs. It's unwise for people to elevate a deity to the throne of supreme providence without understanding His character. A vision of mere power can intoxicate and dehumanize, whether it's cloaked in religious terminology or interpreted blindly as physical force in modern materialism. Only those who have come to know their Deity closely in the private aspects of life, where hearts connect and the subtle nuances of conscience aren't overshadowed by vast natural forces or the complicated movements of world events, can be trusted to engage with larger realms of religion without risking their faith, sensitivity, or conscience.
The whole course of revelation has been bent upon this: to render men familiarly and experimentally acquainted with the character of God, before laying upon them the duty of homage to His creative power or submission to His will. In the Old Testament God is the Friend, the Guide, the Redeemer of men, or ever He is their Monarch and Lawgiver.[112] The Divine name which the Hebrew sees excellent through all the earth is the name that he has learned to know at home as Jehovah, our Lord (Ps. viii.). Jehovah trains His people to trust His personal troth and lovingkindness within their own courts, before He tests their allegiance and discipline upon the high places of the world. And when, amid the strange terrors of these and the novel magnitudes with which Israel, facing the world, had to reckon, the people lost their presence of mind, His elegy over them was, My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Even when their temple is full and their sacrifices of homage to His power most frequent, it is still their want of moral acquaintance with Himself of which He complains: Israel doth not know; My people doth not consider. What else was the tragedy in which Jewish history closed, than just the failure to perceive this lesson: that to have and to communicate the knowledge of the Almighty's character is of infinitely more value than the attempt to vindicate in any outward fashion Jehovah's supremacy over the world? This latter, this forlorn, hope was what Israel exhausted the evening of their day in attempting. The former—to communicate to the lives and philosophies of mankind a knowledge of the Divine heart and will, gained throughout a history of unique grace and miracle—was the destiny which they resigned to the followers of the crucified Messiah.
The entire journey of revelation has focused on this: to help people become familiar with and experience the character of God before asking them to honor His creative power or submit to His will. In the Old Testament, God is seen as the Friend, the Guide, the Redeemer of humanity, before He takes on the role of Monarch and Lawgiver.[112] The Divine name that the Hebrew acknowledges as excellent through all the earth is one he learns to know at home as Jehovah, our Lord (Ps. viii.). Jehovah teaches His people to trust in His personal commitment and lovingkindness within their own lives before testing their loyalty and discipline in the wider world. And when, faced with unfamiliar challenges and the new realities that Israel had to confront, the people lost their composure, His lament was, My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Even when their temple was full and their sacrifices in honor of His power were numerous, He still complained about their lack of moral understanding of Him: Israel does not know; My people do not consider. What else was the tragedy at the end of Jewish history but the failure to recognize this lesson: that having and sharing a deep understanding of the Almighty's character is far more valuable than any outward attempt to prove Jehovah's supremacy over the world? This futile hope was what Israel exhausted their efforts on as their days came to an end. The true purpose—to share a knowledge of the Divine heart and will, gained through a history of unique grace and miracles—was the mission they handed over to the followers of the crucified Messiah.
For under the New Testament this also is the method of revelation. What our King desires before He ascends the throne of the world is that the world should know Him; and so He comes down among us, to be heard, and seen, and handled of us, that our hearts may learn His heart and know His[113] love, unbewildered by His majesty. And for our part, when we ascribe to our King the glory and the dominion, it is as unto Him that loved us and washed us from our sins in His blood. For the chief thing for individuals, as for nations, is not to believe that God reigneth so much as to know what kind of God He is who reigneth.
For in the New Testament, this is also how revelation works. Our King wants the world to know Him before He takes His place as ruler of the world; so He comes down to be heard, seen, and touched by us, so that our hearts can understand His heart and recognize His love, without being overwhelmed by His greatness. And when we give glory and authority to our King, it's because He loved us and purified us from our sins with His blood. The most important thing for individuals, just like for nations, is not just to believe that God reigns, but to understand what kind of God is in charge.
But Ahaz would not be persuaded. He had a policy of his own, and was determined to pursue it. He insisted on appealing to Assyria. Before he did so, Isaiah made one more attempt on his obduracy. With a vehemence, which reveals how critical he felt the king's decision to be, the prophet returned as if this time the very voice of Jehovah. And Jehovah spake to Ahaz, saying, Ask thee a sign of Jehovah thy God; ask it either in Sheol below or in the height above. But Ahaz said, I will not ask, neither will I tempt the Lord.
But Ahaz wouldn’t be swayed. He had his own agenda and was determined to follow it. He insisted on turning to Assyria for help. Before he went ahead, Isaiah made one last effort to change his mind. With a passion that showed just how important he thought the king's choice was, the prophet came back as if he were the very voice of God. And God spoke to Ahaz, saying, Ask for a sign from the Lord your God; ask it either in the depths below or in the heights above. But Ahaz said, I won’t ask, and I won’t test the Lord.
Isaiah's offer of a sign was one which the prophets of Israel used to make when some crisis demanded the immediate acceptance of their word by men, and men were more than usually hard to convince—a miracle such as the thunder that Samuel called out of a clear sky to impress Israel with God's opinion of their folly in asking for a king;[16] or as the rending of the altar which the man of God brought to pass to convict the sullen Jeroboam;[17] or as the regress of the shadow on the sun-dial, which Isaiah himself gave in assurance of recovery to the sick Hezekiah.[18] Such signs are offered only to weak or prejudiced persons. The[114] most real faith, as Isaiah himself tells us, is unforced, the purest natures those which need no signs and wonders. But there are certain crises at which faith must be immediately forced, and Ahaz stood now at such a crisis; and there are certain characters who, unable to read a writ from the court of conscience and reason, must be served with one from a court—even though it be inferior—whose language they understand; and Ahaz was such a character. Isaiah knew his man, and prepared a pretty dilemma for him. By offering him whatever sign he chose to ask, Isaiah knew that the king would be committed before his own honour and the public conscience to refrain from calling in the Assyrians, and so Judah would be saved; or if the king refused the sign, the refusal would unmask him. Ahaz refused, and at once Isaiah denounced him and all his house. They were mere shufflers, playing fast and loose with God as well as men. Hear ye now, O house of David. Is it a small thing for you to weary men, that ye must weary my God also? You have evaded God; therefore God Himself will take you in hand: the Lord Himself shall give you a sign.
Isaiah's offer of a sign was something the prophets of Israel typically did when a crisis required immediate acceptance of their message, especially when people were particularly hard to convince. It could be a miracle like the thunder that Samuel called down from a clear sky to show Israel God’s disapproval of their desire for a king; [16] or the tearing of the altar that the man of God caused to expose the stubborn Jeroboam; [17] or the shadow moving backward on the sundial, which Isaiah himself provided as a sign of healing for the sick Hezekiah. [18] Such signs are given only to those who are weak or biased. The[114] truest faith, as Isaiah pointed out, is unforced; the purest souls are those that need no signs or wonders. However, there are certain moments when faith must be urgently compelled, and Ahaz found himself in such a moment; there are those who, unable to interpret the messages from their own conscience and reason, need a sign from a higher authority—no matter how inferior—that they can understand, and Ahaz was one of those people. Isaiah recognized this and set a clever trap for him. By offering any sign he wanted, Isaiah knew the king would feel pressured, for his own integrity and the public's sense of right demanded he not enlist the Assyrians, thus saving Judah; or if the king turned down the sign, it would expose his true character. Ahaz declined, and immediately Isaiah condemned him and his entire household. They were just tricksters, playing games with both God and man. Listen now, O house of David. Is it such a small thing for you to frustrate people, that you must also frustrate my God? You have dodged God; therefore, God Himself will intervene: the Lord Himself shall give you a sign.
In order to follow intelligently the rest of Isaiah's address, we must clearly understand how the sign which he now promises differs in nature from the sign he had implored Ahaz to select, of whatever sort he may have expected that selection to be. The king's determination to call in Assyria has come between. Therefore, while the sign Isaiah first offered upon the spot was intended for an immediate pledge that God would establish Ahaz, if only he did not appeal to the foreigner, the sign Isaiah now offers shall come as a future proof of how criminal and disastrous the appeal[115] to the foreigner has been. The first sign would have been an earnest of salvation; the second is to be an exposure of the fatal evil of Ahaz's choice. The first would have given some assurance of the swift overthrow of Ephraim and Syria; the second shall be some painful illustration of the fact that not only Syria and Ephraim, but Judah herself, shall be overwhelmed by the advance of the northern power. This second sign is one, therefore, which only time can bring round. Isaiah identifies it with a life not yet born.
To fully grasp the rest of Isaiah's message, we need to clearly understand how the sign he’s about to give is different from the sign he had once suggested Ahaz choose, no matter what type he thought it might be. The king’s decision to seek help from Assyria has changed everything. So, while the first sign Isaiah offered at the time was meant as an immediate assurance that God would support Ahaz, as long as he didn’t seek help from a foreign power, the sign he’s now providing will serve as a future warning of how wrong and harmful that choice has been. The first sign would have been a promise of salvation; the second will highlight the serious consequences of Ahaz’s decision. The first would have assured some quick defeat of Ephraim and Syria; the second will painfully show that not just Syria and Ephraim, but Judah itself will also be overwhelmed by the northern invaders. This second sign is something only time can reveal. Isaiah connects it to a life that hasn’t been born yet.
A Child, he says, shall shortly be born to whom his mother shall give the name Immanu-El—God-with-us. By the time this Child comes to years of discretion, he shall eat butter and honey. Isaiah then explains the riddle. He does not, however, explain who the mother is, having described her vaguely as a or the young woman of marriageable age; for that is not necessary to the sign, which is to consist in the Child's own experience. To this latter he limits his explanation. Butter and honey are the food of privation, the food of a people, whose land, depopulated by the enemy, has been turned into pasture. Before this Child shall arrive at years of discretion not only shall Syria and Ephraim be laid waste, but the Lord Himself will have laid waste Judah. Jehovah shall bring upon thee, and upon thy people and upon thy father's house days, that have not come, from the day that Ephraim departed from Judah; even the king of Assyria. Nothing more is said of Immanuel, but the rest of the chapter is taken up with the details of Judah's devastation.
A child, he says, will soon be born, and his mother will name him Immanuel—God-with-us. By the time this child is old enough to make decisions, he will eat butter and honey. Isaiah then clarifies the riddle. However, he does not specify who the mother is, describing her vaguely as a or the young woman of marriageable age; this detail is not necessary for the sign, which is meant to be understood through the Child's own experience. He focuses his explanation on this aspect. Butter and honey represent the food of scarcity, typical for a people whose land has been devastated by the enemy and turned into pasture. Before this child reaches maturity, not only will Syria and Ephraim be destroyed, but the Lord Himself will also have laid waste to Judah. Jehovah will bring upon you, your people, and your father’s house days that have not come since the day Ephraim left Judah; even the king of Assyria. There’s no further mention of Immanuel, but the rest of the chapter discusses the details of Judah's destruction.
Now this sign and its explanation would have presented little difficulty but for the name of the Child—Immanuel. Erase that, and the passage reads forcibly enough. Before a certain Child, whose birth is vaguely[116] but solemnly intimated in the near future, shall have come to years of discretion, the results of the choice of Ahaz shall be manifest. Judah shall be devastated, and her people have sunk to the most rudimentary means of living. All this is plain. It is a form which Isaiah used more than once to measure the near future. And in other literatures, too, we have felt the pathos of realizing the future results of crime and the length to which disaster lingers, by their effect upon the lives of another generation:—
Now this sign and its explanation would have been easy to understand if it weren't for the name of the Child—Immanuel. Remove that, and the passage reads strongly enough. Before a certain Child, whose birth is vaguely but solemnly hinted at in the near future, reaches maturity, the outcome of Ahaz's choice will become clear. Judah will be devastated, and her people will have lost all but the most basic means of survival. All this is straightforward. It's a form that Isaiah used more than once to predict the near future. And in other texts, too, we have felt the sadness of seeing the future consequences of wrongdoing and the lasting impact of disaster on the lives of the next generation:—
That day's hunt!
But why call the Child Immanuel? The name is evidently part of the sign, and has to be explained in connection with it. Why call a Child God-with-us who is not going to act greatly or to be highly honoured, who is only going to suffer, for whom to come to years of intelligence shall only be to come to a sense of his country's disaster and his people's poverty? This Child who is used so pathetically to measure the flow of time and the return of its revenges, about whom we are told neither how he shall behave himself in the period of privation, nor whether he shall survive it—why is he called Immanuel? or why, being called Immanuel, has he so sordid a fate to contrast with so splendid a name?
But why name the Child Immanuel? The name clearly plays a role in the sign, and it needs to be understood in that context. Why call a Child God-with-us when he isn't going to do anything remarkable or receive any honor, but is only going to suffer? For him, coming of age will just mean realizing the tragedy of his country and the poverty of his people. This Child is sadly used to mark the passage of time and the cycle of retribution, and we aren’t told how he will cope during tough times or if he will even make it through—so why is he called Immanuel? Or, if he's named Immanuel, why does he have such a grim fate that contrasts with such an impressive name?
It seems to the present expositor quite impossible to dissociate so solemn an announcement by Jehovah to the house of David of the birth of a Child, so highly named, from that expectation of the coming of a glorious Prince which was current in this royal family since the days of its founder. Mysterious and abrupt as the intimation of Immanuel's birth may seem to us[117] at this juncture, we cannot forget that it fell from Isaiah's lips on hearts which cherished as their dearest hope the appearance of a glorious descendant of David, and were just now the more sensitive to this hope that both David's city and David's dynasty were in peril. Could Ahaz possibly understand by Immanuel any other child than that Prince whose coming was the inalienable hope of his house? But if we are right in supposing that Ahaz made this identification, or had even the dimmest presage of it, then we understand the full force of the sign. Ahaz by his unbelief had not only disestablished himself (ver. 9): he had mortgaged the hope of Israel. In the flood of disaster, which his fatal resolution would bring upon the land, it mattered little what was to happen to himself. Isaiah does not trouble now to mention any penalty for Ahaz. But his resolve's exceeding pregnancy of peril is borne home to the king by the assurance that it will devastate all the golden future, and must disinherit the promised King. The Child, who is Israel's hope, is born; he receives the Divine name, and that is all of salvation or glory suggested. He grows up not to a throne or the majesty which the seventy-second Psalm pictures—the offerings of Sheba's and Seba's kings, the corn of his land shaking like the fruit of Lebanon, while they of the city flourish like the grass of the earth—but to the food of privation, to the sight of his country razed by his enemies into one vast common fit only for pasture, to loneliness and suffering. Amid the general desolation his figure vanishes from our sight, and only his name remains to haunt, with its infinite melancholy of what might have been, the thorn-choked vineyards and grass-grown courts of Judah.
It seems impossible to the current interpreter to separate such a serious announcement from Jehovah to the house of David about the birth of a Child, so highly regarded, from the expectation of a glorious Prince that has been a part of this royal family since its founding. As mysterious and sudden as the announcement of Immanuel's birth may seem to us[117] at this moment, we can't forget that it was spoken by Isaiah to hearts that deeply cherished the hope of a glorious descendant of David, especially as David's city and dynasty were under threat. Could Ahaz have understood Immanuel to mean anyone other than the Prince whose arrival was the inalienable hope of his lineage? If we are correct in assuming that Ahaz made this connection, or even had a faint idea of it, then we grasp the full weight of the sign. By his lack of faith, Ahaz not only disqualified himself (ver. 9): he also jeopardized the hope of Israel. In the wave of disaster that his disastrous decision would bring upon the land, it mattered little what would happen to him. Isaiah doesn't bother to mention any consequences for Ahaz now. But the extreme danger of his resolve is emphasized to the king with the assurance that it will destroy all the bright future and will take away the promised King. The Child, who represents Israel's hope, is born; he is given the Divine name, and that is all that is implied about salvation or glory. He grows up not to a throne or the majesty depicted in the seventy-second Psalm—the gifts from the kings of Sheba and Seba, the harvest of his land shaking like the fruits of Lebanon, while those in the city prosper like the grass of the earth—but to a life of scarcity, witnessing his country devastated by enemies, turned into a vast wasteland suitable only for grazing, filled with loneliness and suffering. Amid the widespread destruction, his figure disappears from our view, and only his name lingers, haunting the overgrown vineyards and weed-filled courtyards of Judah with its profound sadness of what could have been.
[118]But even if it were to prove too fine a point, to identify Immanuel with the promised Messiah of David's house, and we had to fall back on some vaguer theory of him, finding him to be a personification,—either a representative of the coming generation of God's people, or a type of the promised to-morrow,—the moral effect of the sign would remain the same; and it is with this alone that we have here to do. Be this an individual, or a generation, or an age,—by the Name bestowed upon it, it was to have been a glorious, God-inhabited age, generation, or individual, and Ahaz has prematurely spoiled everything about it but the Name. The future shall be like a boy cursed by his fathers, brought into the world with glorious rights that are stamped in his title, but only to find his kingdom and estates no longer in existence, and all the circumstances dissipated, in which he might have realized the glorious meaning of his name. Type of innocent suffering, he is born to an empty title, his name the vestige of a great opportunity, the ironical monument of an irreparable crime.
[118]But even if we were to be overly precise in identifying Immanuel with the promised Messiah from David's lineage and had to revert to a broader interpretation of him—as either a symbol of the upcoming generation of God's people or a representation of the promised future—the moral impact of the sign would still be the same; and that is what we need to focus on. Whether this refers to an individual, a generation, or an era—by the name given to it, it was supposed to represent a glorious, God-filled era, generation, or person, and Ahaz has prematurely ruined everything about it except for the name. The future will resemble a boy cursed by his ancestors, born into a world with glorious rights declared in his title, only to discover that his kingdom and lands no longer exist, and all the circumstances that would have allowed him to fulfill the magnificent promise of his name have vanished. As a type of innocent suffering, he is born with an empty title, his name an echo of a great chance, the ironic reminder of an irrevocable loss.
If Ahaz had any conscience left, we can imagine the effect of this upon him. To be punished for sin in one's own body and fortune, this is sore enough; but to see heaven itself blackened and all the gracious future frustrate, this is unspeakably terrible.
If Ahaz had any conscience left, we can imagine how this affected him. Being punished for sin in his own body and fortune is tough enough; but seeing heaven itself darkened and all the hopeful future ruined is unimaginably awful.
Ahaz is thus the Judas of the Old Testament, if that conception of Judas' character be the right one which makes his wilful desire to bring about the kingdom of God in his own violent fashion the motive of his betrayal of Jesus. Of his own obduracy Ahaz has betrayed the Messiah and Deliverer of his people. The assurance of this betrayal is the sign of his obduracy, a signal and terrible proof of his irretrievable sin in calling upon the Assyrians. The king has been found wanting.
Ahaz is essentially the Judas of the Old Testament, if we understand Judas as someone who, out of stubbornness, tried to force the kingdom of God through his own violent means, leading to his betrayal of Jesus. In his own stubbornness, Ahaz has betrayed the Messiah and Savior of his people. The certainty of this betrayal is evidence of his hard-heartedness, a strong and terrible reminder of his irreversible sin in seeking help from the Assyrians. The king has been found lacking.
The king has been found wanting; but Isaiah will appeal to the people. Chap. viii. is a collection of addresses to them, as chap. vii. was an expostulation with their sovereign. The two chapters are contemporary. In chap. viii. ver. 1, the narrative goes back upon itself, and returns to the situation as it was before Ahaz made his final resolution of reliance on Assyria. Vv. 1-4 of chap. viii. imply that the Assyrian has not yet been summoned by Ahaz to his assistance, and therefore run parallel to chap. vii. vv. 3-9; but chap. viii. ver. 5 and following verses sketch the evils that are to come upon Judah and Israel, consequent upon the arrival of the Assyrians in Palestine, in answer to the appeal of Ahaz. These evils for land and nation are threatened as absolutely to the people, as they had been to the king. And then the people are thrown over (viii. 14), as the king had been; and Isaiah limits himself to his disciples (ver. 16)—the remnant that was foretold in chap. vi.
The king has been found lacking; however, Isaiah will reach out to the people. Chapter eight is a collection of messages directed at them, just as chapter seven was a confrontation with their leader. The two chapters occur at the same time. In chapter eight, verse 1, the narrative loops back to the situation prior to Ahaz's final decision to rely on Assyria. Verses 1-4 of chapter eight suggest that Ahaz hasn’t yet called on the Assyrians for help, making them parallel to verses 3-9 of chapter seven; however, verse 5 and the following verses in chapter eight outline the troubles that will come upon Judah and Israel as a result of the Assyrians arriving in Palestine because of Ahaz’s request. These threats to land and nation are presented as inevitable for the people, just as they were for the king. Then the people are dismissed (8:14), just as the king had been; and Isaiah focuses on his disciples (verse 16)—the remnant that was foretold in chapter six.
This appeal from monarch to people is one of the most characteristic features of Isaiah's ministry. Whatever be the matter committed to him, Isaiah is not allowed to rest till he has brought it home to the popular conscience; and however much he may be able to charge national disaster upon the folly of politicians or the obduracy of a king, it is the people whom he holds ultimately responsible. The statesman, according to Isaiah, cannot rise far above the level of his generation; the people set the fashion to their most autocratic rulers. This instinct for the popular conscience, this belief in the moral solidarity of a nation and their governors, was the motive of the most picturesque passages in Isaiah's career, and inspired[120] some of the keenest epigrams in which he conveyed the Divine truth. We have here a case in illustration. Isaiah had met Ahaz and his court at the conduit of the upper pool, in the highway of the fuller's field, preparing for the expected siege of the city, and had delivered to them the Lord's message not to fear, for that Syria-Ephraim would certainly be destroyed. But that was not enough. It was now laid upon the prophet to make public and popular advertisement of the same truth.
This appeal from the monarchy to the people is one of the most distinctive aspects of Isaiah's ministry. No matter what issue he faces, Isaiah cannot rest until he has made it clear to the public conscience; and no matter how much he can blame national disasters on the foolishness of politicians or the stubbornness of a king, he ultimately holds the people responsible. According to Isaiah, a statesman can’t rise too far above the level of his generation; the people influence even their most authoritarian leaders. This instinct for public awareness, this belief in the moral unity of a nation and its rulers, drove some of the most vivid moments in Isaiah's career and inspired[120] some of the sharpest sayings with which he expressed Divine truth. Here’s an example. Isaiah had encountered Ahaz and his court at the conduit of the upper pool, in the highway of the fuller's field, preparing for the anticipated siege of the city, and had delivered to them the Lord's message not to be afraid, for Syria-Ephraim would certainly be destroyed. But that wasn’t enough. The prophet was now required to make this truth public and well-known.
Isaiah was told to take a large, smooth board, and write thereon in the character used by the common people—with the pen of a man—as if it were the title to a prophecy, the compound word "Maher-shalal-hash-baz." This was not only an intelligibly written, but a significantly sonorous, word—one of those popular cries in which the liveliest sensations are struck forth by the crowded, clashing letters, full to the dullest ears of rumours of war: speed-spoil-hurry-prey. The interpretation of it was postponed, the prophet meantime taking two faithful witnesses to its publication. In a little a son was born to Isaiah, and to this child he transferred the noisy name. Then its explanation was given. The double word was the alarm of a couple of invasions. Before the boy shall have knowledge to cry, My father, my mother, the riches of Damascus and the spoil of Samaria shall be carried away before the king of Assyria. So far nothing was told the people that had not been told their king; only the time of the overthrow of their two enemies was fixed with greater precision. At the most in a year, Damascus and Samaria would have fallen. The ground was already vibrating to the footfall of the northern hosts.
Isaiah was instructed to take a large, smooth board and write on it in the common people's script—using a regular pen—as if it were the title of a prophecy, the compound word "Maher-shalal-hash-baz." This was not just clearly written but also a strikingly rhythmic word—one of those popular phrases where the energetic sounds convey intense feelings, filled with whispers of war: speed-spoil-hurry-prey. The explanation was delayed, while the prophet gathered two reliable witnesses for its announcement. Soon after, a son was born to Isaiah, and he gave this loud name to the child. Then the meaning was revealed. The compound word signified the warning of two invasions. Before the boy is old enough to say, My father, my mother, the riches of Damascus and the spoils of Samaria will be carried away by the king of Assyria. Up to that point, nothing had been communicated to the people that hadn’t already been shared with their king; only the timing of the defeat of their two enemies was specified with more accuracy. Within a year at most, Damascus and Samaria would fall. The ground was already shaking with the approach of the northern armies.
The rapid political changes, which ensued in Palestine, are reflected on the broken surface of this eighth chapter.[121] We shall not understand these abrupt and dislocated oracles, uttered at short intervals during the two years of the Assyrian campaign, unless we realize that northern shadow passing and repassing over Judah and Israel, and the quick alternations of pride and penitence in the peoples beneath it. We need not try to thread the verses on any line of thought. Logical connection among them there is none. Let us at once get down into the currents of popular feeling, in which Isaiah, having left Ahaz, is now labouring, and casting forth these cries.
The rapid political changes in Palestine are reflected in the fragmented surface of this eighth chapter.[121] We won’t understand these sudden and disjointed messages, delivered at short intervals during the two years of the Assyrian campaign, unless we recognize the shifting shadow over Judah and Israel and the quick swings between pride and regret among the people below it. We don’t need to try to connect the verses with a single idea. There’s no logical flow among them. Instead, let’s dive into the currents of public sentiment, where Isaiah, having left Ahaz, is now working and expressing these cries.
It is a period of powerful currents, a people wholly in drift, and the strongest man of them arrested only by a firm pressure of the Lord's hand. For Jehovah spake thus to me with a strong hand, and instructed me, that I should not walk in the way of this people. The character of the popular movement, the way of this people, which nearly lifted Isaiah off his feet, is evident. It is that into which every nation drifts, who have just been loosened from a primitive faith in God, and by fear or ambition have been brought under the fascination of the great world. On the one hand, such a generation is apt to seek the security of its outward life in things materially large and splendid, to despise as paltry its old religious forms, national aspirations and achievements, and be very desirous to follow foreign fashion and rival foreign wealth. On the other hand, the religious spirit of such an age, withdrawn from its legitimate objects, seeks satisfaction in petty and puerile practices, demeaning itself spiritually, in a way that absurdly contrasts with the grandeur of its material ambitions. Such a stage in the life of a people has its analogy in the growth of the individual, when the boy, new to the world, by affecting the grandest[122] companions and models, assumes an ambitious manner, with contempt for his former circumstances, yet inwardly remains credulous, timid and liable to panic. Isaiah reveals that it was such a stage, which both the kingdoms of Israel had now reached. This people hath refused the waters of Shiloah, that go softly, and rejoice in Rezin and Remaliah's son.
It’s a time of strong currents, with people completely adrift, and the strongest among them held back only by the firm hand of the Lord. For Jehovah spoke to me firmly and instructed me not to follow the way of this people. The nature of the popular movement, the way of this people, which nearly overwhelmed Isaiah, is clear. It represents the path that any nation takes when they’ve just let go of a basic faith in God and, driven by fear or ambition, become captivated by the wider world. On one side, this generation tends to seek security in things that are materially large and impressive, looking down on their old religious practices, national pride, and achievements, eagerly trying to adopt foreign styles and compete with foreign wealth. On the other side, the religious spirit of such an era, drifting away from its true purpose, finds fulfillment in trivial and childish practices, degrading itself spiritually in a way that stands in stark contrast to its lofty material ambitions. This stage in a nation’s life is similar to a young person’s development, where a boy, newly exposed to the world, tries to impress the grandest companions and role models, adopting an ambitious attitude while sneering at his previous life, yet inwardly remains naive, fearful, and prone to panic. Isaiah shows that both kingdoms of Israel had reached this stage. This people has rejected the calming waters of Shiloah and takes pride in Rezin and Remaliah's son.
It was natural, that when the people of Judah contrasted their own estate with that of Assyria, or even of Damascus, they should despise themselves. For what was Judah? A petty principality, no larger than three of our own counties. And what was Jerusalem? A mere mountain village, some sixty or seventy acres of barren rock, cut into tongues by three insignificant valleys, down which there sometimes struggled tiny threads of water, though the beds were oftener dry, giving the town a withered and squalid look—no great river to nourish, ennoble or protect. What were such a country and capital to compare with the empire of Assyria?—the empire of the two rivers, whose powerful streams washed the ramparts, wharves, and palace stairs of mighty cities! What was Jerusalem even to the capital of Rezin? Were not Abana and Pharpar, rivers of Damascus, better than all the waters of Israel, let alone these waterless wâdys, whose bleached beds made the Jewish capital so squalid? It was the Assyrian's vast water system—canals, embankments, sluices, and the wealth of water moving through them—that most impressed the poor Jew, whose streams failed him in summer, and who had to treasure up his scanty stores of rainwater in the cisterns, with which the rocky surface of his territory is still so thickly indented. There had, indeed, been at Jerusalem some attempt to conduct[123] water. It was called The Shiloah—conduit or aqueduct, literally emissary in the old sense of the word—a rough, narrow tunnel of some thousand feet in length, hewn through the living rock from the only considerable spring on the east side of Jerusalem, to a reservoir within the walls. To this day The Shiloah presents itself as not by any means a first-class piece of engineering. Ahaz had either just made the tunnel or repaired it; but if the water went no faster than it travels now, the results were indeed ridiculous. Well might this people despise the waters of the Shiloah, that go trickling, when they thought upon the rivers of Damascus or the broad streams of Mesopotamia. Certainly it was enough to dry up the patriotism of the Judean, if he was capable of appreciating only material value, to look upon this bare, riverless capital, with its bungled aqueduct and trickling water supply. On merely material grounds, Judah was about the last country at that time, in which her inhabitants might be expected to show pride or confidence.
It was natural that when the people of Judah compared their situation with that of Assyria or even Damascus, they ended up feeling worthless. What was Judah? A small principality no bigger than three of our counties. And what was Jerusalem? Just a small mountain village, around sixty or seventy acres of barren rock, broken up by three insignificant valleys that sometimes had tiny trickles of water flowing through them, though the beds were usually dry, making the town look desolate and shabby—no major river to nourish, elevate, or protect it. How could such a country and capital compare to the empire of Assyria?—the empire of the two rivers, whose powerful streams surrounded the fortifications, docks, and palace steps of grand cities! What was Jerusalem even compared to the capital of Rezin? Were Abana and Pharpar, the rivers of Damascus, not better than all the waters of Israel, let alone these dry wādys, whose parched beds made the Jewish capital seem so run-down? It was the Assyrian's extensive water system—canals, embankments, sluices, and the abundant water flowing through them—that impressed the poor Jew the most, whose streams dried up in summer, forcing him to conserve his limited rainwater in cisterns, which still dot the rocky landscape of his territory. There had indeed been some effort in Jerusalem to manage water. It was called The Shiloah—conduit or aqueduct, literally emissary in the old sense—an imperfect, narrow tunnel about a thousand feet long, carved through solid rock from the only significant spring on the east side of Jerusalem to a reservoir inside the walls. Even today, The Shiloah is not considered a top-tier engineering feat. Ahaz either built the tunnel or repaired it; but if the water moved as slowly as it does now, the results were truly laughable. It’s no wonder this people despise the waters of the Shiloah, that go trickling when they think about the rivers of Damascus or the thriving streams of Mesopotamia. Certainly, it was enough to extinguish the patriotism of the Judean, if he only valued material things, to look at this bare, riverless capital with its poorly made aqueduct and meager water supply. Judging purely on material terms, Judah was one of the last places where its residents could be expected to feel pride or confidence at that time.
But woe to the people, whose attachment to their land is based upon its material advantages, who have lost their sense for those spiritual presences, from an appreciation of which springs all true love of country, with warrior's courage in her defence and statesman's faith in her destiny! The greatest calamity, which can befall any people, is to forfeit their enthusiasm for the soil, on which their history has been achieved and their hearths and altars lie, by suffering their faith in the presence of God, of which these are but the tokens, to pass away. With this loss Isaiah now reproaches Judah. The people are utterly materialized; their delights have been in gold and silver, chariots and[124] horses, fenced cities and broad streams, and their faith has now followed their delights. But these things to which they flee will only prove their destruction. The great foreign river, whose waters they covet, will overflow them: even the king of Assyria and all his glory, and he shall come up over all his channels and go over all his banks; and he shall sweep onward into Judah; he shall overflow and pass through; he shall reach even to the neck; and the stretching out of his wings shall fill the breadth of thy land, O Immanuel, thou who art God-with-us. At the sound of the Name, which floats in upon the floods of invasion like the Ark on the waters of old, Isaiah pulls together his distraught faith in his country, and forgetting her faults, flings defiance at her foes. Associate yourselves, ye peoples, and ye shall be broken in pieces; and give ear, all ye of far-off countries, gird yourselves, and ye shall be broken in pieces. Take counsel together, and it shall be brought to nought; speak the word, and it shall not stand: for Immanu-El—"With us is God." The challenge was made good. The prophet's faith prevailed over the people's materialism, and Jerusalem remained inviolable till Isaiah's death.
But woe to the people whose connection to their land is based only on its material benefits, who have lost their sensitivity to the spiritual aspects that inspire true love for their country, along with the bravery to defend it and the hope in its future! The worst thing that can happen to any people is losing their passion for the land where their history happened and where their homes and sacred places are located, by allowing their faith in God—of which these are merely symbols—to fade away. Isaiah now addresses Judah about this loss. The people have become completely materialistic; they find joy in gold and silver, chariots and horses, fortified cities and wide rivers, and their faith has eroded along with their pleasures. But the things they are chasing will only lead to their ruin. The great foreign river, whose waters they desire, will overwhelm them: even the king of Assyria and all his glory, and he shall come up over all his channels and go over all his banks; and he shall sweep onward into Judah; he shall overflow and pass through; he shall reach even to the neck; and the stretching out of his wings shall fill the breadth of thy land, O Immanuel, you who are God-with-us. At the mention of the Name, which comes amid the flood of invasion like the Ark on the ancient waters, Isaiah gathers his troubled faith in his country and, forgetting its faults, boldly confronts its enemies. Associate yourselves, you peoples, and you shall be broken in pieces; and pay attention, all you from distant lands, prepare yourselves, and you shall be broken in pieces. Take counsel together, and it shall be brought to nothing; speak the word, and it shall not stand: for Immanu-El—"With us is God." The challenge was proven true. The prophet's faith triumphed over the people's materialism, and Jerusalem remained safe until Isaiah's death.
Meantime the Assyrian came on. But the infatuated people of Judah continued to tremble rather before the doomed conspirators, Rezin and Pekah. It must have been a time of huge excitement. The prophet tells us how he was steadied by the pressure of the Lord's hand, and how, being steadied, the meaning of the word "Immanuel" was opened out to him. God-with-us is the one great fact of life. Amid all the possible alliances and all the possible fears of a complex political situation, He remains the one certain alliance, the one real fear. Say ye not, A conspiracy, concerning all whereof[125] this people say, A conspiracy; neither fear ye their fear, nor be in dread thereof. Jehovah of hosts, Him shall ye sanctify; and let Him be your fear, and let Him be your dread. God is the one great fact of life, but what a double-edged fact—a sanctuary to all who put their trust in Him, but a rock of offence to both houses of Israel! The figure is very picturesque. An altar, a common stone on steps, one of those which covered the land in large numbers—it is easy to see what a double purpose that might serve. What a joy the sight would be to the weary wanderer or refugee who sought it, what a comfort as he leant his weariness upon it, and knew he was safe! But those who were flying over the land, not seeking Jehovah, not knowing indeed what they sought, blind and panic-stricken—for them what could that altar do but trip them up like any other common rock in their way? "In fact, Divine justice is something which is either observed, desired, or attained, and is then man's weal, or, on the other hand, is overlooked, rejected, or sought after in a wild, unintelligent spirit, and only in the hour of need, and is then their lasting ruin."[19]
Meanwhile, the Assyrians advanced. But the deluded people of Judah continued to fear the doomed conspirators, Rezin and Pekah. It must have been a time of intense excitement. The prophet tells us how he was steadied by the pressure of the Lord's hand and how, once steadied, the meaning of the word "Immanuel" was revealed to him. God-with-us is the one essential truth of life. Amid all the potential alliances and fears from a complicated political situation, He remains the one reliable alliance, the one true fear. Don’t say, ‘It’s a conspiracy,’ about everything this people calls a conspiracy; don’t be afraid of their fear, nor be in dread of it. The Lord of hosts, Him you shall honor; let Him be your fear, and let Him be your dread. God is the one essential truth of life, but what a double-edged truth—a sanctuary to all who trust in Him, but a stumbling block to both houses of Israel! The imagery is very vivid. An altar, a common stone on steps, one of those found abundantly across the land—it’s easy to see its dual purpose. What a joy it would be for the weary wanderer or refugee who sought it, what a comfort as he leaned against it, knowing he was safe! But for those rushing across the land, not seeking Jehovah, not even knowing what they sought, blind and panicked—what could that altar do but trip them up like any other ordinary rock in their path? "In fact, divine justice is something that is either observed, desired, or achieved, and is then beneficial to man, or, on the other hand, is overlooked, rejected, or pursued in a reckless, uninformed way, and only in times of need, leading to their lasting ruin."[19]
The Assyrian came on, and the temper of the Jews grew worse. Samaria was indeed doomed from the first, but for some time Isaiah had been excepting Judah from a judgement for which the guilt of Northern Israel was certainly riper. He foresaw, of course, that the impetus of invasion might sweep the Assyrians into Judah, but he had triumphed in this: that Judah was Immanuel's land, and that all who arrayed themselves against her must certainly come to nought. But now his ideas have changed, as Judah has[126] persisted in evil. He knows now that God is for a stumbling-block to both houses of Israel; nay, that upon Jerusalem herself He will fall as a gin and a snare. Only for a little group of individuals, separate from both States, and gathered round the prophet and the word of God given to him, is salvation certain. People, as well as king, have been found wanting. There remains only this remnant.
The Assyrians came, and the mood of the Jews got worse. Samaria was definitely doomed from the start, but for a while, Isaiah had been excluding Judah from a judgment that Northern Israel was clearly more guilty of. He knew, of course, that the invasion might push the Assyrians into Judah, but he had reason to believe that Judah was the land of Immanuel, and anyone who opposed her would ultimately fail. However, now his views have changed as Judah has[126] continued down a path of evil. He realizes now that God is a stumbling block for both houses of Israel; in fact, He will fall on Jerusalem itself like a trap and a snare. Only a small group of people, separate from both kingdoms, gathered around the prophet and the word of God given to him, will find salvation. Both the people and the king have been found lacking. Only this remnant remains.
Isaiah then at last sees his remnant. But the point we have reached is significant for more than the fulfilment of his expectations. This is the first appearance in history of a religious community, apart from the forms of domestic or national life. "Till then no one had dreamed of a fellowship of faith dissociated from all national forms, bound together by faith in the Divine word alone. It was the birth of a new era in religion, for it was the birth of the conception of the Church, the first step in the emancipation of spiritual religion from the forms of political life."[20]
Isaiah finally sees his remnant. But the moment we’ve reached is important beyond just fulfilling his expectations. This is the first time in history that we see a religious community existing separately from domestic or national life. "Until then, no one had imagined a fellowship of faith unrelated to all national identities, united solely by belief in the Divine word. This marked the beginning of a new era in religion, as it introduced the idea of the Church, the first step towards freeing spiritual religion from the constraints of political life."[20]
The plan of the seventh and eighth chapters is now fully disclosed. As the king for his unworthiness has to give place to the Messiah, so the nation for theirs have to give place to the Church. In the seventh chapter the king was found wanting, and the Messiah promised. In the eighth chapter the people are found wanting; and the prophet, turning from them, proceeds to form the Church among those who accept the Word, which king and people have refused. Bind thou up the testimony, and seal the teaching[21] among my disciples. And I will wait on Jehovah, who hideth His face from[127] the house of Jacob, and I will look for Him. Behold, I and the children Jehovah hath given me are for signs and wonders in Israel from Jehovah of hosts, Him that dwelleth in Mount Zion.
The plan for the seventh and eighth chapters is now fully revealed. Just as the king, due to his unworthiness, has to make way for the Messiah, the nation must make way for the Church because of their shortcomings. In the seventh chapter, the king is found lacking, and the Messiah is promised. In the eighth chapter, the people are found lacking; the prophet, turning away from them, goes on to establish the Church among those who accept the Word, which both the king and people have rejected. Bind up the testimony, and seal the teaching[21] among my disciples. And I will wait on Jehovah, who hides His face from[127] the house of Jacob, and I will look for Him. Behold, I and the children Jehovah has given me are for signs and wonders in Israel from Jehovah of hosts, who dwells in Mount Zion.
This, then, is the situation: revelation concluded, the Church formed upon it, and the nation abandoned. But is that situation final? The words just quoted betray the prophet's hope that it is not. He says: I will wait. He says again: The Lord is only hiding His face from the house of Jacob. I will expect again the shining of His countenance. I will hope for Divine grace and the nation being once more conterminous. The rest of the section (to ix. 7) is the development of this hope, which stirs in the prophet's heart after he has closed the record of revelation.
This is the situation: the revelations have ended, the Church was built on them, and the nation has been left behind. But is this the final state? The words just mentioned reveal the prophet's hope that it isn't. He says: I will wait. He also says: The Lord is just hiding His face from the house of Jacob. I will once again look forward to seeing His shining face. I will hope for Divine grace and that the nation will once again be united. The rest of this section (up to ix. 7) further explores this hope that arises in the prophet's heart after he has finished documenting the revelations.
The darkness deepened across Israel. The Assyrian had come. The northern floods kept surging among the little States of Palestine, and none knew what might be left standing. We can well understand Isaiah pausing, as he did, in face of such rapid and incontrollable movements. When Tiglath-pileser swept over the plain of Esdraelon, casting down the king of Samaria and the Philistine cities, and then swept back again, carrying off upon his ebb the populations east of the Jordan, it looked very like as if both the houses of Israel should fall. In their panic, the people betook themselves to morbid forms of religion; and at first Isaiah was obliged to quench the hope and pity he had betrayed for them in indignation at the utter contrariety of their religious practices to the word of God. There can be no Divine grace for the people as long as they seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto the wizards that chirp and that mutter. For such a disposition the prophet has nothing but scorn, Should not a people[128] seek unto their God? On behalf of the living should they seek unto the dead? They must come back to the prophet's own word before hope may dawn. To the revelation and the testimony! If they speak not according to this word, surely there is no morning for them.
The darkness thickened over Israel. The Assyrians had arrived. The northern floods kept pouring into the small states of Palestine, and no one knew what would remain. It's easy to understand why Isaiah paused in the face of such swift and uncontrollable events. When Tiglath-Pileser invaded the plains of Esdraelon, toppling the king of Samaria and the Philistine cities, and then retreated, taking with him the populations east of the Jordan, it seemed likely that both houses of Israel would collapse. In their panic, the people turned to unhealthy forms of religion; initially, Isaiah had to suppress the hope and compassion he felt for them out of frustration at how opposed their practices were to God's word. There can be no Divine grace for the people as long as they consult those with familiar spirits and wizards who chirp and mutter. For such behavior, the prophet has nothing but contempt, Should not a people[128] seek their God? On behalf of the living, should they seek the dead? They must return to the prophet's own words before any hope can emerge. To the revelation and the testimony! If they don’t speak according to this word, surely there is no dawn for them.
The night, however, grew too awful for scorn. There had been no part of the land so given to the idolatrous practices, which the prophet scathed, as the land of Zebulon and the land of Naphtali, by the sea beyond Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles. But all the horrors of captivity had now fallen upon it, and it had received at the Lord's hand double for all its sins. The night had been torn enough by lightning; was there no dawn? The darkness of these provinces fills the prophet's silenced thoughts. He sees a people hardly bestead and hungry, fretting themselves, cursing their king, who had betrayed them, and their God, who had abandoned them, turning their faces upwards to heaven and downwards to the sacred soil from which they were being dragged, but, behold, distress and darkness, the gloom of anguish; and into thick darkness they are driven away. It is a murky picture, yet through the smoke of it we are able to discern a weird procession of Israelites departing into captivity. We date it, therefore, about 732 B.C., the night of Israel's first great captivity. The shock and the pity of this rouse the prophet's great heart. He cannot continue to say that there is no morning for those benighted provinces. He will venture a great hope for their people.
The night, however, turned too terrible to ignore. No region had been as devoted to the idol-worship that the prophet condemned as the land of Zebulon and the land of Naphtali, by the sea beyond Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles. But now, all the horrors of captivity had descended upon it, and it had received double punishment for all its sins from the Lord. The night had been ravaged by lightning; was there no dawn? The darkness in these areas fills the prophet's silenced thoughts. He sees a people struggling and hungry, tormenting themselves, cursing their king who had betrayed them, and their God who had forsaken them, looking up to heaven and down to the sacred soil from which they were being dragged, but, behold, distress and darkness, the gloom of anguish; and into thick darkness they are driven away. It is a grim picture, yet through the haze, we can make out a strange procession of Israelites being taken into captivity. We date this to around 732 B.C., the night of Israel's first great captivity. The shock and sorrow of this stir the prophet's great heart. He cannot keep saying that there is no morning for those lost provinces. He will dare to hope greatly for their people.
Over how many months the crowded verses, viii. 21-ix. 7, must be spread, it is useless now to inquire—whether the revulsion they mark arose all at once in the prophet's mind, or hope grew gradually brighter as the smoke of war died away on Israel's[129] northern frontier during 731 B.C. It is enough that we can mark the change. The prophet's tones pass from sarcasm to pity (viii. 20, 21); from pity to hope (viii. 22-ix. 1); from hope to triumph in the vision of salvation actually achieved (ix. 2). The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light; they that dwelt in the land of the shadow of death, on them hath the light shined. For a mutilated, we see a multiplied, nation; for the fret of hunger and the curses of defeat, we hear the joy of harvest and of spoil after victory. For the yoke of his burden, and the staff of his shoulder, the rod of his oppressor, Thou hast broken as in the day of Midian. War has rolled away for ever over that northern horizon, and all the relics of war in the land are swept together into the fire. For all the armour of the armed man in the tumult, and the garments rolled in blood, shall even be for burning, and for fuel of fire. In the midday splendour of this peace, which, after the fashion of Hebrew prophecy, is described as already realized, Isaiah hails the Author of it all in that gracious and marvellous Child whose birth he had already intimated, Heir to the throne of David, but entitled by a fourfold name, too generous, perhaps, for a mere mortal, Wonderful-Counsellor, Hero-God, Father-Everlasting, Prince-of-peace, who shall redeem the realms of his great forerunner and maintain Israel with justice and righteousness from henceforth, even for ever.
Over how many months the crowded verses, viii. 21-ix. 7, must be spread, it is useless now to inquire—whether the changes they describe happened all at once in the prophet's mind, or if hope grew gradually brighter as the smoke of war faded on Israel's [129] northern frontier during 731 B.C.. It’s enough that we can see the change. The prophet’s tone shifts from sarcasm to pity (viii. 20, 21); from pity to hope (viii. 22-ix. 1); and from hope to triumph in the vision of salvation actually achieved (ix. 2). The people who walked in darkness have seen a great light; those who lived in the land of the shadow of death, the light has shined on them. For a damaged nation, we now see a flourishing one; instead of the pain of hunger and the curses of defeat, we hear the joy of harvest and the spoils of victory. For the yoke of his burden, and the staff on his shoulder, the rod of his oppressor, You have broken as in the day of Midian. War has rolled away forever over that northern horizon, and all the remnants of war in the land are gathered together into the fire. For all the armor of the armed man in the chaos, and the garments rolled in blood, shall be for burning, and for fuel of fire. In the bright light of this peace, which, like Hebrew prophecy, is described as already fulfilled, Isaiah praises the source of it all in that gracious and marvelous Child whose birth he had already hinted at. Heir to the throne of David, but honored with a fourfold name, perhaps too generous for a mere mortal: Wonderful-Counselor, Hero-God, Father-Everlasting, Prince-of-peace, who will redeem the territories of his great predecessor and maintain Israel with justice and righteousness from now on, forever.
When, finally, the prophet inquires what has led his thoughts through this rapid change from satisfaction (chap. viii. 16) with the salvation of a small remnant of believers in the word of God—a little kernel of patience in the midst of a godless and abandoned people—to the daring vision of a whole nation redeemed and established in peace under a Godlike King,[130] he says: The zeal of the Lord of hosts hath performed this.
When the prophet finally asks what caused his thoughts to shift so quickly from being satisfied (chap. viii. 16) with the salvation of a small remnant of believers in the word of God—a tiny core of patience amid a godless and abandoned people—to the bold vision of an entire nation saved and thriving in peace under a Godlike King,[130] he says: The zeal of the Lord of hosts has accomplished this.
The zeal, translates our English version, but no one English word will give it. It is that mixture of hot honour and affection to which "jealousy" in its good sense comes near. It is that overflow of the love that cannot keep still, which, when men think God has surely done all He will or can do for an ungrateful race, visits them in their distress, and carries them forward into unconceived dispensations of grace and glory. It is the Spirit of God, which yearns after the lost, speaks to the self-despairing of hope, and surprises rebel and prophet alike with new revelations of love. We have our systems representing God's work up to the limits of our experience, and we settle upon them; but the Almighty is ever greater than His promise or than His revelation of Himself.
The zeal translates to our English version, but no single English word can capture it. It's that blend of passionate honor and affection that "jealousy" in its positive sense comes closest to. It's the overflow of love that can't stay contained, which, when people think God has done all He will or can for an ungrateful humanity, reaches out to them in their distress and leads them into unimaginable acts of grace and glory. It's the Spirit of God, longing for the lost, offering hope to those who feel hopeless, and surprising both rebels and prophets with fresh revelations of love. We have our systems that represent God's work based on our experiences, and we become comfortable with them; but the Almighty is always greater than His promises or His revelations of Himself.
CHAPTER VII.
THE MESSIAH.
We have now reached that point of Isaiah's prophesying at which the Messiah becomes the most conspicuous figure on his horizon. Let us take advantage of it, to gather into one statement all that the prophet told his generation concerning that exalted and mysterious Person.[22]
We have now reached that point in Isaiah's prophecies where the Messiah stands out as the most significant figure on his horizon. Let's take this opportunity to compile everything the prophet shared with his generation about this remarkable and enigmatic Person.[22]
When Isaiah began to prophesy, there was current among the people of Judah the expectation of a glorious King. How far the expectation was defined it is impossible to ascertain; but this at least is historically certain. A promise had been made to David (2 Sam. vii. 4-17) by which the permanence of his dynasty was assured. His offspring, it was said, should succeed him, yet eternity was promised not to any individual descendant, but to the dynasty. Prophets earlier than Isaiah emphasized this establishment of the house of David, even in the days of Israel's greatest distress; but they said nothing of a single monarch with whom the fortunes of the house were to be identified. It is[132] clear, however, even without the evidence of the Messianic Psalms, that the hope of such a hero was quick in Israel. Besides the documentary proof of David's own last words (2 Sam. xxiii.), there is the manifest impossibility of dreaming of an ideal kingdom apart from the ideal king. Orientals, and especially Orientals of that period, were incapable of realizing the triumph of an idea or an institution without connecting it with a personality. So that we may be perfectly sure, that when Isaiah began to prophesy the people not only counted upon the continuance of David's dynasty, as they counted upon the presence of Jehovah Himself, but were familiar with the ideal of a monarch, and lived in hope of its realization.
When Isaiah started prophesying, the people of Judah had an expectation of a glorious King. It's hard to pin down exactly how defined that expectation was, but this is historically certain: a promise had been made to David (2 Sam. vii. 4-17) guaranteeing the permanence of his dynasty. It was said that his descendants would succeed him, but eternity was promised not to a specific descendant, but to the dynasty itself. Prophets before Isaiah highlighted the establishment of David's house, even during Israel's toughest times; however, they didn't mention a single monarch tied to the fate of the house. It is[132] clear, even without the evidence from the Messianic Psalms, that the hope for such a hero was alive in Israel. In addition to David's own last words (2 Sam. xxiii.) serving as proof, it's evident that people could not envision an ideal kingdom without linking it to an ideal king. People of the East, especially during that time, couldn't imagine the success of an idea or institution without associating it with a personal figure. So, we can be certain that when Isaiah began to prophesy, the people not only expected the continuation of David's dynasty, as they expected the presence of Jehovah Himself, but were also familiar with the idea of a monarch and hoped for its realization.
In the first stage of his prophecy, it is remarkable, Isaiah makes no use of this tradition, although he gives more than one representation of Israel's future in which it might naturally have appeared. No word is spoken of a Messiah even in the awful conversation, in which Isaiah received from the Eternal the fundamentals of his teaching. The only hope there permitted to him is the survival of a bare, leaderless few of the people, or, to use his own word, a stump, with no sign of a prominent sprout upon it. In connection, however, with the survival of a remnant, as we have said on chap. vi. (p. 89), it is plain that there were two indispensable conditions, which the prophet could not help having to state sooner or later. Indeed, one of them he had mentioned already. It was indispensable that the people should have a leader, and that they should have a rallying-point. They must have their King, and they must have their City. Every reader of Isaiah knows that it is on these two themes the prophet rises to the height of his eloquence—Jerusalem shall remain inviolable;[133] a glorious King shall be given unto her. But it has not been so generally remarked, that Isaiah is far more concerned and consistent about the secure city than about the ideal monarch. From first to last the establishment and peace of Jerusalem are never out of his thoughts, but he speaks only now and then of the King to come. Through long periods of his ministry, though frequently describing the blessed future, he is silent about the Messiah, and even sometimes so groups the inhabitants of that future, as to leave no room for Him among them. Indeed, the silences of Isaiah upon this Person are as remarkable as the brilliant passages, in which he paints His endowments and His work.
In the first stage of his prophecy, it’s notable that Isaiah doesn’t draw on this tradition, even though he presents multiple visions of Israel's future where it could have easily fit in. There’s no mention of a Messiah, even in the intense conversation where Isaiah receives the core of his teachings from the Eternal. The only hope allowed to him is for a few, insignificant survivors of the people, or, to use his own term, a stump, with no sign of a prominent shoot on it. However, in connection with the survival of a remnant, as we mentioned in chap. vi. (p. 89), it’s clear that there were two essential conditions that the prophet had to express sooner or later. In fact, he has already mentioned one of them. It was essential that the people have a leader and a rallying point. They needed their King and their City. Every reader of Isaiah knows that he rises to the peak of his eloquence on these two themes—Jerusalem will remain untouched; [133] a glorious King will be given to her. But it’s not often noted that Isaiah is much more focused and consistent about the secure city than about the ideal monarch. From beginning to end, establishing and ensuring peace in Jerusalem is always on his mind, while he only occasionally mentions the coming King. Throughout long stretches of his ministry, although he frequently depicts a blessed future, he is silent about the Messiah, sometimes even arranging the inhabitants of that future in a way that excludes Him. In fact, Isaiah's silences about this figure are as striking as the powerful passages where he describes His qualities and His work.
If we consider the moment, chosen by Isaiah for announcing the Messiah and adding his seal to the national belief in the advent of a glorious Son of David, we find some significance in the fact that it was a moment, when the throne of David was unworthily filled and David's dynasty was for the first time seriously threatened. It is impossible to dissociate the birth of a boy called Immanuel, and afterwards so closely identified with the fortunes of the whole land (vii. 8), from the public expectation of a King of glory; and critics are almost unanimous in recognizing Immanuel again in the Prince-of-the-Four-Names in chap. ix. Immanuel, therefore, is the Messiah, the promised King of Israel. But Isaiah makes his own first intimation of Him, not when the throne was worthily filled by an Uzziah or a Jotham, but when a fool and traitor to God abused its power, and the foreign conspiracy to set up a Syrian prince in Jerusalem imperilled the whole dynasty. Perhaps we ought not to overlook the fact, that Isaiah does not here designate Immanuel as a descendant of David. The vagueness with which the[134] mother is described has given rise to a vast amount of speculation as to what particular person the prophet meant by her. But may not Isaiah's vagueness be the only intention he had in mentioning a mother at all? The whole house of David shared at that moment the sin of the king (vii. 13); and it is not presuming too much upon the freedom of our prophet to suppose, that he shook himself loose from the tradition, which entailed the Messiah upon the royal family of Judah, and at least left it an open question, whether Immanuel might not, in consequence of their sin, spring from some other stock.
If we look at the moment chosen by Isaiah to announce the Messiah and confirm the national belief in the arrival of a glorious Son of David, we notice it was a time when David's throne was being poorly occupied, and the dynasty was facing a serious threat for the first time. It’s impossible to separate the birth of a boy named Immanuel, who was later closely connected to the fortunes of the entire land (vii. 8), from the public expectation of a glorious King; and critics generally agree that Immanuel is again represented by the Prince-of-the-Four-Names in chap. ix. Therefore, Immanuel is the Messiah, the promised King of Israel. However, Isaiah first mentions Him not when a worthy king like Uzziah or Jotham was on the throne, but when a fool and traitor to God was misusing its power, and the foreign plot to install a Syrian prince in Jerusalem threatened the whole dynasty. We should also consider that Isaiah doesn’t specify Immanuel as a descendant of David. The ambiguity surrounding the mother has sparked a lot of speculation about who the prophet might have meant. But could it be that Isaiah’s vagueness was his purpose in mentioning a mother at all? At that moment, the entire house of David shared in the king's sin (vii. 13); and it may not be too far-fetched to think that the prophet detached himself from the tradition that tied the Messiah to the royal family of Judah, leaving open the possibility that, due to their sin, Immanuel might come from another lineage.
It is, however, far less with the origin, than with the experience, of Immanuel that Isaiah is concerned; and those who embark upon curious inquiries, as to who exactly the mother might be, are busying themselves with what the prophet had no interest in, while neglecting that in which really lay the significance of the sign that he offered.
It is, however, much less about the origin than about the experience of Immanuel that Isaiah is focused on; and those who get caught up in trying to find out who the mother might be are preoccupying themselves with something the prophet was not interested in, while overlooking the true significance of the sign he provided.
Ahaz by his wilfulness has made a Substitute necessary. But Isaiah is far more taken up with this: that he has actually mortgaged the prospects of that Substitute. The Messiah comes, but the wilfulness of Ahaz has rendered His reign impossible. He, whose advent has hitherto not been foretold except as the beginning of an era of prosperity, and whose person has not been painted but with honour and power, is represented as a helpless and innocent Sufferer—His prospects dissipated by the sins of others, and Himself born only to share His people's indigence (p. 115). Such a representation of the Hero's fate is of the very highest interest. We are accustomed to associate the conception of a suffering Messiah only with a much later development of prophecy, when Israel went into exile; but the conception[135] meets us already here. It is another proof that Esaias is very bold. He calls his Messiah Immanuel, and yet dares to present Him as nothing but a Sufferer—a Sufferer for the sins of others. Born only to suffer with His people, who should have inherited their throne—that is Isaiah's first doctrine of the Messiah.
Ahaz, due to his stubbornness, has made it necessary to have a Substitute. But Isaiah is more focused on the fact that he has actually compromised the future of that Substitute. The Messiah will come, but Ahaz's stubbornness has made His reign impossible. He, whose arrival has only been foretold as the start of a prosperous era, and whose character has been depicted with honor and power, is portrayed as a helpless and innocent Sufferer—His future ruined by the sins of others, and born only to share in His people's poverty (p. 115). This portrayal of the Hero's fate is of great significance. We usually associate the idea of a suffering Messiah with a later stage of prophecy, when Israel was in exile; however, this idea appears even here. It's further evidence that Esaias is very bold. He calls his Messiah Immanuel, yet he dares to present Him as nothing more than a Sufferer—a Sufferer for the sins of others. Born only to endure suffering alongside His people, who should have claimed their throne—that is Isaiah's initial teaching about the Messiah.
Through the rest of the prophecies published during the Syro-Ephraitic troubles the Sufferer is slowly transformed into a Deliverer. The stages of this transformation are obscure. In chap. viii. Immanuel is no more defined than in chap. vii. He is still only a Name of hope upon an unbroken prospect of devastation. The stretching out of his wings—i.e., the floods of the Assyrian—shall fill the breadth of Thy land, O Immanuel. But this time that the prophet utters the Name, he feels inspired by new courage. He grasps at Immanuel as the pledge of ultimate salvation. Let the enemies of Judah work their worst; it shall be in vain, for Immanuel, God is with us. And then, to our astonishment, while Isaiah is telling us how he arrived at the convictions embodied in this Name, the personality of Immanuel fades away altogether, and Jehovah of hosts Himself is set forth as the sole sanctuary of those who fear Him. There is indeed a double displacement here. Immanuel dissolves in two directions. As a Refuge, He is displaced by Jehovah; as a Sufferer and a Symbol of the sufferings of the land, by a little community of disciples, the first embodiment of the Church, who now, with Isaiah, can do nothing except wait for the Lord (pp. 124-126).
Through the rest of the prophecies shared during the Syro-Ephraimitic conflicts, the Sufferer gradually turns into a Deliverer. The stages of this transformation are unclear. In chapter eight, Immanuel is just as undefined as in chapter seven. He is still just a Name of hope amid a continuous scene of destruction. The stretching out of his wings—i.e., the floods of the Assyrian—will cover the width of Your land, O Immanuel. But this time when the prophet speaks the Name, he feels a surge of new strength. He clings to Immanuel as a promise of eventual salvation. Let the enemies of Judah do their worst; it will be for nothing, for Immanuel, God is with us. Then, surprisingly, as Isaiah shares how he came to the beliefs associated with this Name, the identity of Immanuel completely fades away, and Jehovah of hosts is presented as the only refuge for those who revere Him. There is indeed a double shift here. Immanuel is replaced in two ways. As a Refuge, He is replaced by Jehovah; as a Sufferer and a Symbol of the land's suffering, by a small group of followers, the first representation of the Church, who, along with Isaiah, can now only wait for the Lord (pp. 124-126).
Then, when the prophet's yearning thoughts, that will not rest upon so dark a closure, struggle once more, and struggling pass from despair to pity, and from pity to hope, and from hope to triumph in a salvation[136] actually achieved, they hail all at once as the Hero of it the Son whose birth was promised. With an emphasis, which vividly reveals the sense of exhaustion in the living generation and the conviction that only something fresh, and sent straight from God Himself, can now avail Israel, the prophet cries: Unto us a Child is born; unto us a Son is given. The Messiah appears in a glory that floods His origin out of sight. We cannot see whether He springs from the house of David; but the government is to be upon His shoulder, and He shall reign on David's throne with righteousness for ever. His title shall be fourfold: Wonderful-Counsellor, God-Hero, Father-Everlasting, Prince-of-Peace.
Then, when the prophet’s longing thoughts, unable to accept such a dark conclusion, struggle once again, shifting from despair to pity, from pity to hope, and from hope to triumph in a salvation[136] that is actually realized, they suddenly proclaim as the Hero of it the Son whose birth was promised. With an emphasis that clearly shows the weariness of the current generation and the belief that only something new, sent directly from God Himself, can now save Israel, the prophet exclaims: Unto us a Child is born; unto us a Son is given. The Messiah appears in a glory that makes His origins fade from view. We cannot tell if He comes from the house of David; but the government will be on His shoulders, and He shall reign on David's throne with righteousness forever. His title will be fourfold: Wonderful-Counsellor, God-Hero, Father-Everlasting, Prince-of-Peace.
These Four Names do certainly not invite us to grudge them meaning, and they have been claimed as incontrovertible proofs, that the prophet had an absolutely Divine Person in view. Some distinguished scholars insist that the promised Deliverer is nothing less than a God in the metaphysical sense of the word.[23] There are serious reasons, however, which make us doubt this conclusion, and, though we firmly hold that Jesus Christ was God, prevent us from recognizing these names as prophecies of His Divinity. Two of the names are capable of being used of an earthly monarch: Wonderful-Counsellor and Prince-of-Peace, which are, within the range of human virtue, in evident contrast to Ahaz, at once foolish in the conception of his policy and warlike in its results. It will be more difficult to get Western minds to see how Father-Everlasting may be applied to a mere man, but the ascription of eternity is not unusual in Oriental[137] titles, and in the Old Testament is sometimes rendered to things that perish. When Hebrews speak of any one as everlasting, that does not necessarily imply Divinity. The second name, which we render God-Hero, is, it is true, used of Jehovah Himself in the very next chapter to this, but in the plural it is also used of men by Ezekiel (xxxii. 21). The part of it translated God is a frequent name of the Divine Being in the Old Testament, but literally means only mighty, and is by Ezekiel (xxxi. 11) applied to Nebuchadnezzar. We should hesitate, therefore, to understand by these names "a God in the metaphysical sense of the word."
These Four Names definitely don’t allow us to begrudge them meaning, and they’ve been presented as clear evidence that the prophet was referring to a completely Divine Being. Some notable scholars argue that the promised Deliverer is nothing less than a God in the philosophical sense. However, there are significant reasons that make us question this conclusion. While we firmly believe that Jesus Christ was God, it prevents us from identifying these names as predictions of His Divinity. Two of the names can also refer to an earthly king: Wonderful-Counsellor and Prince-of-Peace, which stand in contrast to Ahaz, who was both misguided in his policies and aggressive in their outcomes. It may be more challenging for Western thinkers to see how Father-Everlasting could pertain to an ordinary man, but the concept of eternity isn't uncommon in Eastern titles. In the Old Testament, it can sometimes refer to transient things. When Hebrews label someone as everlasting, it doesn’t necessarily mean they’re Divine. The second name, which we translate as God-Hero, is indeed used for Jehovah in the very next chapter, but in the plural form, it can also refer to humans, as seen in Ezekiel (xxxii. 21). The term translated as God is a common reference to the Divine in the Old Testament, but literally means just mighty, and Ezekiel (xxxi. 11) applies it to Nebuchadnezzar. Therefore, we should be cautious about interpreting these names as representing "a God in the metaphysical sense."
We fall back with greater confidence on other arguments of a more general kind, which apply to all Isaiah's prophecies of the Messiah. If Isaiah had one revelation rather than another to make, it was the revelation of the unity of God. Against king and people, who crowded their temple with the shrines of many deities, Isaiah presented Jehovah as the one only God. It would simply have nullified the force of his message, and confused the generation to which he brought it, if either he or they had conceived of the Messiah, with the conceiving of Christian theology, as a separate Divine personality.
We can confidently rely on other broader arguments that apply to all of Isaiah's prophecies about the Messiah. If Isaiah had a specific revelation to share, it was the revelation of the unity of God. Against the king and the people, who filled their temple with the idols of many gods, Isaiah presented Jehovah as the one true God. It would completely undermine the impact of his message and confuse the people he addressed if either he or they viewed the Messiah, as Christian theology does, as a separate Divine being.
Again, as Mr. Robertson Smith has very clearly explained,[24] the functions assigned by Isaiah to the King of the future are simply the ordinary duties of the monarchy, for which He is equipped by the indwelling of that Spirit of God, that makes all wise men wise and valorous men valorous. "We believe in a Divine and eternal Saviour, because the work of salvation as we understand it in the light of the[138] New Testament is essentially different from the work of the wisest and best earthly king." But such an earthly king's work is all Isaiah looks for. So that, so far from its being derogatory to Christ to grudge the sense of Divinity to these names, it is a fact that the more spiritual our notions are of the saving work of Jesus, the less inclined shall we be to claim the prophecies of Isaiah in proof of His Deity.
Again, as Mr. Robertson Smith has clearly explained,[24] the roles assigned by Isaiah to the future King are just the regular responsibilities of a monarch, which He fulfills through the presence of the Spirit of God that gives wisdom to wise people and courage to brave ones. "We believe in a Divine and eternal Savior because the idea of salvation, as we see it through the lens of the[138] New Testament, is fundamentally different from the work of the wisest and best earthly king." However, that's all an earthly king's work is what Isaiah anticipates. Therefore, rather than undermining Christ to begrudge the idea of Divinity to these figures, the reality is that the more spiritual our understanding of Jesus' saving work, the less we will be inclined to use Isaiah's prophecies as evidence of His Divinity.
There is a third argument in the same direction, the force of which we appreciate only when we come to discover how very little from this point onwards Isaiah had to say about the promised king. In chaps. i.-xxxix. only three other passages are interpreted as describing the Messiah. The first of these, xi. 1-5, dating perhaps from about 720, when Hezekiah was king, tells us, for the first and only time by Isaiah's lips, that the Messiah is to be a scion of David's house, and confirms what we have said: that His duties, however perfectly they were to be discharged, were the usual duties of Judah's monarchy.[25] The second passage, xxxii. 1 ff., which dates probably from after 705, when Hezekiah was still king, is, if indeed it refers at all to the Messiah, a still fainter, though sweeter, echo of previous descriptions. While the third passage, xxxiii. 17: Thou shalt see thy king in his beauty, does not refer to the Messiah at all, but to Hezekiah, then prostrate and in sackcloth, with Assyria thundering at the gate of Jerusalem (701). The mass of Isaiah's predictions of the Messiah thus fall within the reign of Ahaz, and just at the point at which Ahaz proved an unworthy representative of[139] Jehovah, and Judah and Israel were threatened with complete devastation. There is a repetition when Hezekiah has come to the throne. But in the remaining seventeen years, except perhaps for one allusion, Isaiah is silent on the ideal king, although he continued throughout that time to unfold pictures of the blessed future which contained every other Messianic feature, and the realization of which he placed where he had placed his Prince-of-the-Four-Names—in connection, that is, with the approaching defeat of the Assyrians. Ignoring the Messiah, during these years Isaiah lays all the stress of his prophecy on the inviolability of Jerusalem; and while he promises the recovery of the actually reigning monarch from the distress of the Assyrian invasion,—as if that were what the people chiefly desired to see, and not a brighter, stronger substitute,—he hails Jehovah Himself, in solitary and undeputed sovereignty, as Judge, Lawgiver, Monarch and Saviour (xxxiii. 22). Between Hezekiah, thus restored to his beauty, and Jehovah's own presence, there is surely no room left for another royal personage. But these very facts—that Isaiah felt most compelled to predict an ideal king when the actual king was unworthy, and that, on the contrary, when the reigning king proved worthy, approximating to the ideal, Isaiah felt no need for another, and indeed in his prophecies left no room for another—form surely a powerful proof that the king he expected was not a supernatural being, but a human personality, extraordinarily endowed by God, one of the descendants of David by ordinary succession, but fulfilling the ideal which his forerunners had missed. Even if we allow that the four names contain among them the predicate of Divinity, we must not overlook the fact that the[140] Prince is only called by them. It is not that He is, but that He shall be called, Wonderful-Counsellor, God-Hero, Father-Everlasting, Prince-of-Peace. Nowhere is there a dogmatic statement that He is Divine. Besides, it is inconceivable that if Isaiah, the prophet of the unity of God, had at any time a second Divine Person in his hope, he should have afterwards remained so silent about Him. To interpret the ascription of the Four Names as a conscious definition of Divinity, at all like the Christian conception of Jesus Christ, is to render the silence of Isaiah's later life and the silence of subsequent prophets utterly inexplicable.
There’s a third argument that supports this idea, and we only fully understand its strength when we realize how little Isaiah had to say about the promised king from this point on. In chapters 1-39, only three other passages are described as referencing the Messiah. The first, chapters 11:1-5, which may have been written around 720 during Hezekiah's reign, tells us for the first and only time through Isaiah's words that the Messiah will be a descendant of David’s family. It confirms our previous point: that while His responsibilities would be perfectly fulfilled, they were the ordinary duties of Judah's monarchy.[25] The second passage, chapter 32:1 and following, likely written after 705 while Hezekiah was still king, only vaguely mentions the Messiah, presenting a softer echo of earlier descriptions. The third passage, chapter 33:17: You will see your king in his beauty, actually refers to Hezekiah himself, who was then weakened and in sackcloth as Assyria pounded on Jerusalem’s gates (701). Most of Isaiah’s Messianc predictions are thus located during Ahaz’s reign, particularly when Ahaz was revealed to be an inadequate representative of[139] Jehovah and when Judah and Israel faced total destruction. There’s a reiteration with Hezekiah on the throne. However, during the next seventeen years, except for perhaps one reference, Isaiah doesn’t speak of the ideal king, despite continuously revealing visions of a blessed future that included every other Messianic trait, connecting its realization to the impending defeat of the Assyrians. During these years, Isaiah focuses entirely on the inviolability of Jerusalem while promising the recovery of the reigning monarch from the stress of the Assyrian invasion—as though that was what the people most wanted, rather than a brighter, stronger alternative. He instead celebrates Jehovah Himself, as the sole and unquestioned Judge, Lawgiver, Monarch, and Savior (chapter 33:22). Between the restored Hezekiah and Jehovah’s presence, there’s clearly no space for another royal figure. Yet, the very facts—that Isaiah predicted an ideal king when the actual king was unworthy, and that when the reigning king turned out to be worthy and close to the ideal, Isaiah felt no need for another—strongly indicate that the king he anticipated was not a supernatural being, but a remarkable human figure blessed by God, a descendant of David through the usual lineage, yet fulfilling the ideal that his predecessors failed to achieve. Even if we accept that the four names imply a divine quality, we must remember that the[140] Prince is designated by them. It’s not that He is divine, but that He will be called Wonderful-Counselor, God-Hero, Father-Everlasting, Prince-of-Peace. There’s no definitive statement claiming He is Divine. Moreover, it’s unimaginable that if Isaiah, the prophet of God's unity, had ever anticipated a second Divine Person, he would later have remained completely silent about Him. To interpret the attribution of the Four Names as a deliberate definition of Divinity akin to the Christian understanding of Jesus Christ makes Isaiah's silence later in life and the silence of subsequent prophets utterly inexplicable.
On these grounds, then, we decline to believe that Isaiah saw in the king of the future "a God in the metaphysical sense of the word." Just because we know the proofs of the Divinity of Jesus to be so spiritual, do we feel the uselessness of looking for them to prophecies, that manifestly describe purely earthly and civil functions.
On these grounds, we refuse to believe that Isaiah saw "a God in the metaphysical sense of the word" in the future king. Since we understand the evidence of Jesus’ Divinity to be so spiritual, we find it pointless to look for support in prophecies that clearly describe only earthly and civil roles.
But such a conclusion by no means shuts us out from tracing a relation between these prophecies and the appearance of Jesus. The fact, that Isaiah allowed them to go down to posterity, proves that he himself did not count them to have been exhausted in Hezekiah. And this fact of their preservation is ever so much the more significant, that their literal truth was discredited by events. Isaiah had evidently foretold the birth and bitter youth of Immanuel for the near future. Immanuel's childhood was to begin with the devastation of Ephraim and Syria, and to be passed in circumstances consequent on the devastation of Judah, which was to follow close upon that of her two enemies. But although Ephraim and Syria were immediately spoiled, as Isaiah foresaw, Judah lay in peace all the reign of Ahaz and[141] many years after his death. So that had Immanuel been born in the next twenty-five years after the announcement of His birth, He would not have found in His own land the circumstances which Isaiah foretold as the discipline of His boyhood. Isaiah's forecast of Judah's fate was, therefore, falsified by events. That the prophet or his disciples should have allowed it to remain, is proof that they believed it to have contents, which the history they had lived through neither exhausted nor discredited. In the prophecies of the Messiah there was something ideal, which was as permanent and valid for the future as the prophecy of the Remnant or that of the visible majesty of Jehovah. If the attachment, at which the prophet aimed when he launched these prophecies on the stream of time, was denied them by their own age, that did not mean their submersion, but only their freedom to float further down the future and seek attachment there.
But this conclusion doesn’t prevent us from finding a connection between these prophecies and the arrival of Jesus. The fact that Isaiah allowed them to be passed down shows that he didn’t think they were fully fulfilled in Hezekiah. The preservation of these prophecies is even more significant because their literal truth was challenged by events. Isaiah clearly predicted the birth and troubled childhood of Immanuel for the near future. Immanuel's early life was supposed to begin with the devastation of Ephraim and Syria, and he was meant to experience the aftermath of Judah's destruction, which was to happen right after that of his two enemies. However, although Ephraim and Syria were quickly ruined as Isaiah predicted, Judah remained peaceful throughout Ahaz’s reign and many years after his death. So, had Immanuel been born within twenty-five years after the announcement of his birth, he wouldn’t have found the circumstances Isaiah foretold to shape his childhood in his own land. Isaiah's prediction about Judah’s fate was therefore contradicted by actual events. That the prophet or his followers allowed it to remain is evidence that they believed it contained truths that the history they experienced neither completed nor disproved. In the prophecies of the Messiah, there was something ideal, which was as lasting and relevant for the future as the prophecy of the Remnant or the visible majesty of Jehovah. If the attachment the prophet hoped for when he released these prophecies into the stream of time was denied by his own age, that doesn’t mean they were submerged, but simply that they were free to drift further into the future and seek attachment there.
This boldness, to entrust to future ages a prophecy discredited by contemporary history, argues a profound belief in its moral meaning and eternal significance; and it is this boldness, in face of disappointment continued from generation to generation in Israel, that constitutes the uniqueness of the Messianic hope among that people. To sublimate this permanent meaning of the prophecies from the contemporary material, with which it is mixed, is not difficult. Isaiah foretells his Prince on the supposition that certain things are fulfilled. When the people are reduced to the last extreme, when there is no more a king to rally or to rule them, when the land is in captivity, when revelation is closed, when, in despair of the darkness of the Lord's face, men have taken to them that have familiar spirits and wizards that peep[142] and mutter, then, in that last sinful, hopeless estate of man, a Deliverer shall appear. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform it. This is the first article of Isaiah's Messianic creed, and stands back behind the Messiah and all Messianic blessings, their exhaustless origin. Whatsoever man's sin and darkness be, the Almighty lives, and His zeal is infinite. Therefore it is a fact eternally true, that whatsoever Deliverer His people need and can receive shall be sent to them, and shall be styled by whatsoever names their hearts can best appreciate. Titles shall be given Him to attract their hope and their homage, and not a definition of His nature, of which their theological vocabulary would be incapable. This is the vital kernel of Messianic prophecy in Isaiah. The zeal of the Lord, kindling the dark thoughts of the prophet as he broods over his people's need of salvation, suddenly makes a Saviour visible—visible just as He is needed there and then. Isaiah hears Him hailed by titles that satisfy the particular wants of the age, and express men's thoughts as far up the idea of salvation and majesty as they of that age can rise. But the prophet has also perceived that sin and disaster will so accumulate before the Messiah comes, that, though innocent, He shall have to bear tribulation and pass to His prime through suffering. No one with open mind can deny, that in this moderate estimate of the prophet's meaning there is a very great deal of the essence of the Gospel as it has been fulfilled in the personal consciousness and saving work of Jesus Christ,—as much of that essence, indeed, as it was possible to communicate to so early a generation, and one whose religious needs were so largely what we call temporal. But if we grant this, and if at the same time we appreciate the uniqueness of such a hope as[143] this of Israel, then surely it must be allowed to have the appearance of a special preparation for Christ's life and work; and so, to use very moderate words which have been applied to Messianic prophecy in general, it may be taken "as a proof of its true connection with the Gospel dispensation as part of one grand scheme in the counsels of Providence."[26]
This boldness, in trusting future generations with a prophecy that is questioned by contemporary history, demonstrates a deep belief in its moral meaning and lasting importance; and it is this boldness, even in the face of ongoing disappointment in Israel, that makes the Messianic hope unique among this people. It’s not hard to elevate this enduring significance of the prophecies from the contemporary material with which it is blended. Isaiah predicts his Prince on the assumption that certain conditions are met. When the people are at their lowest point, when there is no king to unite or govern them, when the land is in captivity, when revelation is closed, and when, in despair over the Lord's hidden face, people have turned to mediums and those who whisper and mutter, then, in that last sinful, hopeless state, a Deliverer will appear. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will accomplish it. This is the cornerstone of Isaiah's Messianic belief, standing behind the Messiah and all the blessings He brings, their endless source. No matter how much sin and darkness prevail, the Almighty lives, and His zeal is boundless. Therefore, it is eternally true that whatever Deliverer His people need and are ready to receive will be sent to them, and will be called by whatever names resonate most with their hearts. Titles will be given to Him to inspire their hope and respect, not to define His nature, which their theological vocabulary would be inadequate to capture. This is the essential core of Messianic prophecy in Isaiah. The zeal of the Lord, igniting the prophet's thoughts as he reflects on his people's need for salvation, suddenly brings a Savior into focus—visible just as He is needed in that moment. Isaiah hears Him called by titles that address the specific needs of the time and reflect the highest ideas of salvation and majesty that people of that era can grasp. However, the prophet also realizes that sin and suffering will accumulate before the Messiah arrives, meaning that, though innocent, He will have to endure hardship and come to His glory through suffering. No one can honestly deny that in this moderate interpretation of the prophet's meaning lies a significant part of the essence of the Gospel as it has been fulfilled in the life and saving work of Jesus Christ—essentially as much as could be communicated to an early generation, whose religious needs were mostly what we would call temporal. But if we accept this, and at the same time acknowledge the uniqueness of such a hope in Israel, then it certainly appears to be a special preparation for Christ's life and work; therefore, to use very moderate terms that have been applied to Messianic prophecy in general, it can be seen "as evidence of its genuine connection to the Gospel dispensation as part of one grand design in the plans of Providence."[26]
Men do not ask when they drink of a streamlet high up on the hills, "Is this going to be a great river?" They are satisfied if it is water enough to quench their thirst. And so it was enough for Old Testament believers if they found in Isaiah's prophecy of a Deliverer—as they did find—what satisfied their own religious needs, without convincing them to what volumes it should swell. But this does not mean that in using these Old Testament prophecies we Christians should limit our enjoyment of them to the measure of the generation to whom they were addressed. To have known Christ must make the predictions of the Messiah different to a man. You cannot bring so infinite an ocean of blessing into historic connection with these generous, expansive intimations of the Old Testament without its passing into them. If we may use a rough figure, the Messianic prophecies of the Old Testament are tidal rivers. They not only run, as we have seen, to their sea, which is Christ; they feel His reflex influence. It is not enough for a Christian to have followed the historical direction of the prophecies, or to have proved their connection with the New Testament as parts of one Divine harmony. Forced back by the fulness of meaning to which he has found[144] their courses open, he returns to find the savour of the New Testament upon them, and that where he descended shallow and tortuous channels, with all the difficulties of historical exploration, he is borne back on full tides of worship. To use the appropriate words of Isaiah, the Lord is with him there, a place of broad rivers and streams.
Men don't ask when they drink from a stream high up in the hills, "Is this going to be a great river?" They're just happy if it’s enough water to satisfy their thirst. Similarly, Old Testament believers were content to find in Isaiah's prophecy of a Deliverer—just as they did—what fulfilled their spiritual needs, without needing to know how extensive it would become. But that doesn't mean we Christians should restrict our understanding of these Old Testament prophecies to the perspective of the generation they were given to. Knowing Christ changes how a person views the predictions of the Messiah. You can’t link such a vast ocean of blessings to these generous, expansive hints from the Old Testament without transforming them. If we’re being rough, the Messianic prophecies of the Old Testament are like tidal rivers. They not only flow, as we've seen, toward their end point, which is Christ; they are also influenced by Him. It isn’t enough for a Christian to simply have traced the historical path of the prophecies or to have shown their connection to the New Testament as parts of one Divine harmony. Confronted by the depth of meaning he discovers, he returns to find the essence of the New Testament in them, and where he waded through shallow and winding paths, full of historical challenges, he is now carried back by the strong currents of worship. To borrow from Isaiah, the Lord is with him there, a place of broad rivers and streams.
With all this, however, we must not forget that, beside these prophecies of a great earthly ruler, there runs another stream of desire and promise, in which we see a much stronger premonition of the fact that a Divine Being shall some day dwell among men. We mean the Scriptures in which it is foretold that Jehovah Himself shall visibly visit Jerusalem. This line of prophecy, taken along with the powerful anthropomorphic representations of God,—astonishing in a people like the Jews, who so abhorred the making of an image of the Deity upon the likeness of anything in heaven and earth,—we hold to be the proper Old Testament instinct that the Divine should take human form and tabernacle amongst men. But this side of our subject—the relation of the anthropomorphism of the Old Testament to the Incarnation—we postpone till we come to the second part of the book of Isaiah, in which the anthropomorphic figures are more frequent and daring than they are here.
With all this, we must not forget that alongside these prophecies of a great earthly ruler, there exists another thread of hope and promise, pointing to the fact that a Divine Being will one day live among people. We're talking about the Scriptures that predict that Jehovah Himself will visibly visit Jerusalem. This line of prophecy, when paired with the striking human-like depictions of God—surprising for a people like the Jews, who strongly opposed creating any images of the Deity resembling anything in heaven or earth—represents the true Old Testament understanding that the Divine should take human form and dwell among humanity. However, we will save this aspect of our discussion—the relationship between the anthropomorphism of the Old Testament and the Incarnation—for the second part of the book of Isaiah, where these human-like representations are more common and bold than they are here.
BOOK II.
PROPHECIES FROM THE ACCESSION OF HEZEKIAH TO THE DEATH OF SARGON, 727-705 B.C.
Isaiah:— |
xxviii. 725 B.C. |
x. 5-34. 721 B.C. |
xi., xii. About 720 B.C.? |
xx. 711 BCE |
xxi. 1-10. 710 B.C. |
xxxviii., xxxix. Between 712 and 705 BCE |
BOOK II.
The prophecies with which we have been engaged (chaps. ii.-x. 4) fall either before or during the great Assyrian invasion of Syria, undertaken in 734-732 by Tiglath-pileser II., at the invitation of King Ahaz. Nobody has any doubt about that. But when we ask what prophecies of Isaiah come next in chronological order, we raise a storm of answers. We are no longer on the sure ground we have been enjoying.
The prophecies we’ve been looking at (chaps. ii.-x. 4) occur either before or during the major Assyrian invasion of Syria, which took place from 734 to 732 under Tiglath-pileser II., at King Ahaz's request. There’s no doubt about that. However, when we try to determine which prophecies of Isaiah come next in chronological order, we open up a flood of different opinions. We’re no longer on the solid ground we were on before.
Under the canonical arrangement the next prophecy is "The Woe upon the Assyrian" (x. 5-34). In the course of this the Assyrian is made to boast of having overthrown Samaria (vv. 9-11): Is not Samaria as Damascus?... Shall I not, as I have done unto Samaria and her idols, so do to Jerusalem and her idols? If Samaria mean the capital city of Northern Israel—and the name is never used in these parts of Scripture for anything else—and if the prophet be quoting a boast which the Assyrian was actually in a position to make, and not merely imagining a boast, which he would be likely to make some years afterwards (an entirely improbable view, though held by one great scholar[27]), then an event is here described as past and over which[148] did not happen during Tiglath-pileser's campaign, nor indeed till twelve years after it. Tiglath-pileser did not require to besiege Samaria in the campaign of 734-732. The king, Pekah, was slain by a conspiracy of his own subjects; and Hoshea, the ringleader, who succeeded, willingly purchased the stability of a usurped throne by homage and tribute to the king of kings. So Tiglath-pileser went home again, satisfied to have punished Israel by carrying away with him the population of Galilee. During his reign there was no further appearance of the Assyrians in Palestine, but at his death in 727 Hoshea, after the fashion of Assyrian vassals when the throne at Nineveh changed occupants, attempted to throw off the yoke of the new king, Salmanassar IV. Along with the Phœnician and Philistine cities, Hoshea negotiated an alliance with So, or Seve, the Ethiopian, a usurper who had just succeeded in establishing his supremacy over the land of the Pharaohs. In a year Salmanassar marched south upon the rebels. He took Hoshea prisoner on the borders of his territory (725), but, not content, as his predecessor had been, with the submission of the king, he came up throughout all the land, and went up to Samaria, and besieged it three years.[28] He did not live to see the end of the siege, and Samaria was taken in 722 by Sargon, his successor. Sargon overthrew the kingdom and uprooted the people. The northern tribes were carried away into a captivity, from which as tribes they never returned.
Under the standard arrangement, the next prophecy is "The Woe upon the Assyrian" (x. 5-34). In this, the Assyrian boasts about having conquered Samaria (vv. 9-11): Is not Samaria like Damascus?... Shall I not, just like I did to Samaria and her idols, do the same to Jerusalem and her idols? If Samaria refers to the capital of Northern Israel—and the name is only used in these texts for that purpose—and if the prophet is quoting a boast that the Assyrian could actually have made, rather than just imagining one he might make years later (an unlikely view, although held by one renowned scholar[27]), then we're looking at an event described as something that happened in the past, which didn’t actually occur during Tiglath-pileser's campaign, nor until twelve years later. Tiglath-pileser didn’t have to besiege Samaria during his campaign from 734-732. King Pekah was killed by a conspiracy among his own people; Hoshea, the mastermind behind it, who took over, willingly secured his stolen throne by paying tribute to the king of kings. So, Tiglath-pileser returned home, satisfied that he had punished Israel by taking away the population of Galilee. During his reign, there was no other sign of the Assyrians in Palestine, but when he died in 727, Hoshea, like other Assyrian vassals when the king in Nineveh changed, tried to free himself from the new king, Salmanassar IV. Together with the Phoenician and Philistine cities, Hoshea formed an alliance with So, or Seve, the Ethiopian, a usurper who had just established his dominance over the land of the Pharaohs. A year later, Salmanassar marched south against the rebels. He captured Hoshea on the edge of his territory (725), but unlike his predecessor, who was satisfied with just the king's submission, he traveled throughout all the land, went up to Samaria, and besieged it for three years.[28] He didn’t live to see the end of the siege, and Samaria fell in 722 to Sargon, his successor. Sargon destroyed the kingdom and uprooted the people. The northern tribes were taken into captivity, from which they never returned as tribes.
It was evidently this complete overthrow of Samaria by Sargon in 722-721, which Isaiah had behind him when he wrote x. 9-11. We must, therefore, date the[149] prophecy after 721, when nothing was left as a bulwark between Judah and the Assyrian. We do so with reluctance. There is much in x. 5-34 which suits the circumstances of Tiglath-pileser's invasion. There are phrases and catch-words coinciding with those in vii.-ix. 7; and the whole oration is simply a more elaborate expression of that defiance of Assyria, which inspires such of the previous prophecies as viii. 9, 10. Besides, with the exception of Samaria, all the names in the Assyrian's boastful catalogue—Carchemish, Calno, Arpad, Hamath and Damascus—might as justly have been vaunted by the lips of Tiglath-pileser as by those of Sargon. But in spite of these things, which seem to vindicate the close relation of x. 5-34 to the prophecies which precede it in the canon, the mention of Samaria as being already destroyed justifies us in divorcing it from them. While they remain dated from before 732, we place it subsequent to 722.
It was clearly the total defeat of Samaria by Sargon in 722-721 that Isaiah had in mind when he wrote x. 9-11. Therefore, we must date the[149] prophecy after 721, when there was nothing left to protect Judah from the Assyrians. We do this reluctantly. There is a lot in x. 5-34 that fits the situation of Tiglath-pileser's invasion. Some phrases and keywords match those in vii.-ix. 7, and the entire speech is just a more detailed expression of the defiance against Assyria, which is present in earlier prophecies like viii. 9, 10. Additionally, aside from Samaria, all the names in the Assyrian's bragging list—Carchemish, Calno, Arpad, Hamath, and Damascus—could just as easily have been touted by Tiglath-pileser as by Sargon. However, despite these points that seem to link x. 5-34 closely to the earlier prophecies in the canon, the mention of Samaria as already destroyed allows us to separate it from them. While those earlier prophecies are dated before 732, we place this one after 722.
Was Isaiah, then, silent these ten years? Is there no prophecy lying farther on in his book that treats of Samaria as still standing? Besides an address to the fallen Damascus in xvii. 1-11, which we shall take later with the rest of Isaiah's oracles on foreign states, there is one large prophecy, chap. xxviii., which opens with a description of the magnates of Samaria lolling in drunken security on their vine-crowned hill, but God's storms are ready to break. Samaria has not yet fallen, but is threatened and shall fall soon. The first part of chap. xxviii. can only refer to the year, in which Salmanassar advanced upon Samaria—726 or 725. There is nothing in the rest of it to corroborate this date; but the fact, that there are several turns of thought and speech very similar to turns of thought and speech in x. 5-34, makes us the bolder to take[150] away xxviii. from its present connection with xxix.-xxxii., and place it just before x. 5-34.
Was Isaiah silent for those ten years? Is there no prophecy later in his book that discusses Samaria as still intact? Besides a message to the fallen Damascus in xvii. 1-11, which we’ll address later with the rest of Isaiah's prophecies about foreign nations, there is one significant prophecy, chap. xxviii., which starts with a depiction of Samaria's leaders lounging in drunken confidence on their vine-covered hill, but God's storms are ready to strike. Samaria hasn’t fallen yet, but it’s under threat and will soon fall. The first part of chap. xxviii. must refer to the year when Salmanassar attacked Samaria—726 or 725. There’s nothing in the rest of it to confirm this date; however, the various ideas and phrases that closely resemble those in x. 5-34 encourage us to take[150] xxviii. out of its current connection with xxix.-xxxii. and place it just before x. 5-34.
Here then is our next group of prophecies, all dating from the first seven years of the reign of Hezekiah: xxviii., a warning addressed to the politicians of Jerusalem from the impending fate of those of Samaria (date 725); x. 5-34, a woe upon the Assyrian (date about 720), describing his boasts and his progress in conquest till his sudden crash by the walls of Jerusalem; xi., of date uncertain, for it reflects no historical circumstance, but standing in such artistic contrast to x. that the two must be treated together; and xii., a hymn of salvation, which forms a fitting conclusion to xi. With these we shall take the few fragments of the book of Isaiah which belong to the fifteen years 720-705, and are as straws to show how Judah all that time was drifting down to alliance with Egypt—xx., xxi. 1-10, and xxxviii.-xxxix. This will bring us to 705, and the beginning of a new series of prophecies, the richest of Isaiah's life, and the subject of our third book.
Here is our next set of prophecies, all from the first seven years of Hezekiah's reign: xxviii., a warning to the politicians of Jerusalem from the fate befalling Samaria (date 725); x. 5-34, a lament about the Assyrian (date around 720), detailing his boasts and successes in conquest until his abrupt downfall at the walls of Jerusalem; xi., whose date is uncertain, as it does not reflect any particular historical event, but is so artistically contrasted with x. that the two should be considered together; and xii., a hymn of salvation, which serves as a fitting conclusion to xi. Along with these, we will include the few fragments of the book of Isaiah that belong to the fifteen years from 720 to 705, which show how Judah was gradually moving toward an alliance with Egypt—xx., xxi. 1-10, and xxxviii.-xxxix. This will lead us to 705 and the start of a new set of prophecies, the most significant of Isaiah's life, which will be the focus of our third book.
CHAPTER VIII.
GOD'S COMMONPLACE.
Isaiah xxviii. (ABOUT 725 B.C.)
Isaiah 28. (ABOUT 725 B.C.)
The twenty-eighth chapter of the Book of Isaiah is one of the greatest of his prophecies. It is distinguished by that regal versatility of style, which places its author at the head of Hebrew writers. Keen analyses of character, realistic contrasts between sin and judgement, clever retorts and epigrams, rapids of scorn, and "a spate" of judgement, but for final issue a placid stream of argument banked by sweet parable—such are the literary charms of the chapter, which derives its moral grandeur from the force with which its currents set towards faith and reason, as together the salvation of states, politicians and private men. The style mirrors life about ourselves, and still tastes fresh to thirsty men. The truths are relevant to every day in which luxury and intemperance abound, in which there are eyes too fevered by sin to see beauty in simple purity, and minds so surfeited with knowledge or intoxicated with their own cleverness, that they call the maxims of moral reason commonplace and scorn religious instruction as food for babes.
The twenty-eighth chapter of the Book of Isaiah is one of his most significant prophecies. It stands out for its royal versatility of style, which positions its author at the forefront of Hebrew writers. Sharp analyses of character, realistic contrasts between sin and judgment, witty comebacks and clever sayings, rapid waves of scorn, and a flood of judgment, yet ultimately a calm stream of reasoning backed by sweet parables—these are the literary charms of the chapter. It draws its moral strength from the forcefulness with which its themes promote faith and reason, as they are essential for the salvation of states, politicians, and ordinary people. The style reflects the life around us and still feels fresh to those seeking meaning. The truths are relevant to every day filled with luxury and excess, where there are eyes too troubled by sin to appreciate the beauty of simple purity, and minds so overwhelmed with knowledge or intoxicated by their own cleverness that they dismiss moral maxims as mundane and ridicule religious teachings as childish.
Some time when the big, black cloud was gathering again on the north, Isaiah raised his voice to the magnates of Jerusalem: "Lift your heads from your[152] wine-bowls; look north. The sunshine is still on Samaria, and your fellow-drinkers there are revelling in security. But the storm creeps up behind. They shall certainty perish soon; even you cannot help seeing that. Let it scare you, for their sin is yours, and that storm will not exhaust itself on Samaria. Do not think that your clever policies, alliance with Egypt or the treaty with Assyria herself, shall save you. Men are never saved from death and hell by making covenants with them. Scorners of religion and righteousness, except ye cease being sceptical and drunken, and come back from your diplomacy to faith and reason, ye shall not be saved! This destruction that looms is going to cover the whole earth. So stop your running to and fro across it in search of alliances. He that believeth shall not make haste. Stay at home and trust in the God of Zion, for Zion is the one thing that shall survive." In the parable, which closes the prophecy, Isaiah offers some relief to this dark prospect: "Do not think of God as a mere disaster-monger, maker of terrors for men. He has a plan, even in catastrophe, and this deluge, which looks like destruction for all of us, has its method, term and fruits, just as much as the husbandman's harrowing of the earth or threshing of the corn."
Some time when the big, black cloud was gathering again in the north, Isaiah raised his voice to the leaders of Jerusalem: "Lift your heads from your [152] wine-bowls; look north. The sunshine is still on Samaria, and your fellow drinkers there are enjoying their security. But the storm is creeping up behind. They will definitely perish soon; even you can see that. Let it alarm you, for their sin is yours, and that storm will not just spare Samaria. Don’t think that your clever policies, alliance with Egypt, or the treaty with Assyria itself will save you. People cannot be saved from death and destruction by making deals with them. You who mock religion and righteousness, unless you stop being skeptical and drunk, and return from your diplomacy to faith and reason, you will not be saved! This looming destruction will cover the whole earth. So stop running around searching for alliances. Those who believe will not be in a hurry. Stay at home and trust in the God of Zion, for Zion is the one thing that will survive." In the parable, which concludes the prophecy, Isaiah offers some hope for this bleak outlook: "Do not think of God as just a bringer of disasters, a creator of terrors for people. He has a plan, even in catastrophe, and this flood, which seems like destruction for all of us, has its method, purpose, and outcomes, just like the farmer's plowing of the earth or threshing of the grain."
The chapter with this argument falls into four divisions.
The chapter with this argument is divided into four sections.
I. The Warning from Samaria (vv. 1-6).
I. The Warning from Samaria (vv. 1-6).
They had always been hard drinkers in North Israel. Fifty years before, Amos flashed judgement on those who trusted in the mount of Samaria, lolling upon their couches and gulping their wine out of basons, women as well as men. Upon these same drunkards of Ephraim,[153] now soaked and stunned with wine, Isaiah fastens his Woe. Sunny the sky and balmy the air in which they lie, stretched upon flowers by the heads of their fat valleys—a land that tempts its inhabitants with the security of perpetual summer. But God's swift storm drives up the valley—hail, rain and violent streams from every gorge. Flowers, wreaths and pampered bodies are trampled in the mire. The glory of sunny Ephraim is as the first ripe fig a man findeth, and while it is yet in his hand, he eateth it up. But while drunken magnates and the flowers of a rich land are swept away, there is a residue who can and do abide even that storm, to whom the Lord Himself shall be for a crown, a spirit of justice to him that sitteth for justice, and for strength to them that turn back the battle at the gate.
They had always been heavy drinkers in northern Israel. Fifty years earlier, Amos judged those who relied on the mount of Samaria, lounging on their couches and drinking their wine from bowls, both women and men. Now, Isaiah directs his Woe at these same drunkards of Ephraim, [153] who are now soaked and numb from wine. The sky is bright, and the air is warm while they lie stretched out on flowers at the edges of their fertile valleys—a land that lures its people with the promise of endless summer. But God’s swift storm comes up the valley, bringing hail, rain, and rushing streams from every ravine. Flowers, wreaths, and pampered bodies are trampled in the mud. The glory of sun-drenched Ephraim is like the first ripe fig one finds, and before it’s even in his hand, he devours it. Yet, as the drunken elites and the beauty of this wealthy land are swept away, there remains a remnant who can endure the storm, to whom the Lord Himself will be a crown, a spirit of justice for the one who seeks justice, and strength for those who turn back the battle at the gate.
Isaiah's intention is manifest, and his effort a great one. It is to rob passion of its magic and change men's temptations to their disgusts, by exhibiting how squalid passion shows beneath disaster, and how gloriously purity shines surviving it. It is to strip luxury and indulgence of their attractiveness by drenching them with the storm of judgement, and then not to leave them stunned, but to rouse in them a moral admiration and envy by the presentation of certain grand survivals of the storm—unstained justice and victorious valour. Isaiah first sweeps the atmosphere, hot from infective passion, with the cold tempest from the north. Then in the clear shining after rain he points to two figures, which have preserved through temptation and disaster, and now lift against a smiling sky, the ideal that those corrupt judges and drunken warriors have dragged into the mire—him that sitteth for justice and him that turneth back the battle at the gate. The[154] escape from sensuality, this passage suggests, is two-fold. There is the exposure to nature where God's judgements sweep their irresistible way; and then from the despair, which the unrelieved spectacle of judgement produces, there is the recovery to moral effort through the admiration of those purities and heroisms, that by God's Spirit have survived.
Isaiah's purpose is clear, and his effort is significant. He aims to strip passion of its allure and transform people's temptations into their aversions by showing how grim passion appears in the face of disaster, and how beautifully purity shines as it endures. He intends to remove the charm from luxury and indulgence by soaking them in the storm of judgment, and then he doesn’t just leave them in shock, but inspires in them a moral admiration and envy by showcasing certain grand examples of survival through the storm—spotless justice and triumphant courage. Isaiah first clears the air, heated by infectious passion, with a cold tempest from the north. Then, in the clear brightness after the rain, he points to two figures that have withstood temptation and disaster, now standing against a bright sky, representing the ideals that those corrupt judges and drunken warriors have dragged through the dirt—him that sitteth for justice and him that turneth back the battle at the gate. The[154]escape from sensuality, this passage suggests, comes in two parts. First, there’s exposure to nature where God’s judgments make their unstoppable path; then, from the despair created by the stark display of judgment, there’s a return to moral effort through the admiration of those pure and heroic figures that have endured by God's Spirit.
When God has put a conscience into the art or literature of any generation, they have followed this method of Isaiah, but not always to the healthy end which he reaches. To show the slaves of Circe the physical disaster impending—which you must begin by doing if you are to impress their brutalized minds—is not enough. The lesson of Tennyson's "Vision of Sin" and of Arnold's "New Sirens," that night and frost, decay and death, come down at last on pampered sense, is necessary, but not enough. Who stops there remains a defective and morbid moralist. When you have made the sensual shiver before the disease that inevitably awaits them, you must go on to show that there are men who have the secret of surviving the most terrible judgements of God, and lift their figures calm and victorious against the storm-washed sky. Preach the depravity of men, but never apart from the possibilities that remain in them. It is Isaiah's health as a moralist that he combines the two. No prophet ever threatened judgement more inexorable and complete than he. Yet he never failed to tell the sinner, how possible it was for him to be different. If it were necessary to crush men in the mud, Isaiah would not leave them there with the hearts of swine. But he put conscience in them, and the envy of what was pure, and the admiration of what was victorious. Even as they wallowed, he pointed them to the figures of men[155] like themselves, who had survived and overcome by the Spirit of God. Here we perceive the ethical possibilities, that lay in his fundamental doctrine of a remnant. Isaiah never crushed men beneath the fear of judgement, without revealing to them the possibility and beauty of victorious virtue. Had we lived in those great days, what a help he had been to us—what a help he may be still!—not only firm to declare that the wages of sin is death, but careful to effect that our humiliation shall not be despair, and that even when we feel our shame and irretrievableness the most, we shall have the opportunity to behold our humanity crowned and seated on the throne from which we had fallen, our humanity driving back the battle from the gate against which we had been hopelessly driven! That seventh verse sounds like a trumpet in the ears of enervated and despairing men.
When God has instilled a conscience in the art or literature of any generation, they have often followed Isaiah's approach, though not always with the healthy outcome he achieves. To show Circe's slaves the looming physical disaster—something you must start with if you want to reach their brutalized minds—is insufficient. The lessons from Tennyson's "Vision of Sin" and Arnold's "New Sirens" remind us that night, frost, decay, and death will eventually catch up to pampered senses, and while this is important, it’s not enough. Those who stop there become flawed and morbid moralists. After making the sensual shudder at the inevitable disease awaiting them, you must also illustrate that there are those who hold the secret to surviving God's most severe judgments, standing calm and victorious against the stormy sky. Speak of humanity's depravity, but never without highlighting the potentials that still exist within them. Isaiah's strength as a moralist lies in his ability to combine these two perspectives. No prophet ever proclaimed judgment as absolute and thorough as he did. Yet, he always reminded the sinner of the possibility of change. If it meant bringing men low, Isaiah wouldn’t leave them with the hearts of swine. Instead, he instilled in them a conscience, stirring envy for what is pure and admiration for what is victorious. Even as they wallowed, he pointed them to figures of men like themselves who had survived and triumphed through the Spirit of God. Here, we see the ethical potential embedded in his fundamental doctrine of a remnant. Isaiah never crushed individuals under the weight of judgment without unveiling the possibility and beauty of triumphant virtue. If we had lived in those great times, what a support he could have been to us—what a support he still is!—not only boldly stating that the wages of sin is death but also ensuring that our humiliation doesn’t lead to despair, and that even in our deepest shame and sense of hopelessness, we would have the chance to see our humanity crowned and seated on the throne from which we fell, our humanity pushing back the onslaught at the gates against which we were relentlessly driven! That seventh verse resonates like a trumpet in the ears of worn-out and despairing people.
II. God's Commonplace (vv. 7-13).
II. God's Commonplace (vv. 7-13).
But Isaiah has cast his pearls before swine. The men of Jerusalem, whom he addresses, are too deep in sensuality to be roused by his noble words. Even priest and prophet stagger through strong drink; and the class that should have been the conscience of the city, responding immediately to the word of God, reel in vision and stumble in judgement. They turn upon Isaiah's earnest message with tipsy men's insolence. Verses 9 and 10 should be within inverted commas, for they are the mocking reply of drunkards over their cups. Whom is he going to teach knowledge, and upon whom is he trying to force "the Message," as he calls it? Them that are weaned from the milk and drawn from the breasts? Are we school-children, that he treats us with his endless platitudes and repetitions—[156]precept upon precept and precept upon precept, line upon line and line upon line, here a little and there a little? So did these bibulous prophets, priests and politicians mock Isaiah's messages of judgement, wagging their heads in mimicry of his simple, earnest tones. "We must conceive the abrupt, intentionally short, reiterated and almost childish words of verse 10 as spoken in mimicry, with a mocking motion of the head, and in a childish, stammering, taunting tone."[29]
But Isaiah has wasted his efforts on people who don’t appreciate them. The people of Jerusalem he talks to are too caught up in their pleasures to be inspired by his noble words. Even priests and prophets are stumbling around drunk; and the group that should be the city's moral compass, reacting to God’s message, are hazy in vision and confused in judgment. They respond to Isaiah's heartfelt message with the arrogance of drunkards. Verses 9 and 10 should be in quotation marks because they are the teasing response of tipsy people chatting over drinks. Who is he trying to teach knowledge, and who is he trying to force "the Message," as he calls it? Those who have grown up from milk and weaned from the breast? Are we kids in school that he treats us to his endless clichés and repetitions—[156]precept upon precept and precept upon precept, line upon line and line upon line, here a little and there a little? This is how these drunken prophets, priests, and politicians mocked Isaiah’s messages of judgment, shaking their heads in imitation of his simple, heartfelt tone. "We should imagine the abrupt, pathetically short, repeated, and almost childish words of verse 10 as spoken mockingly, with a headshake, and in a childish, stammering, teasing voice."[29]
But Isaiah turns upon them with their own words: "You call me, Stammerer! I tell you that God, Who speaks through me, and Whom in me you mock, will one day speak again to you in a tongue that shall indeed sound stammering to you. When those far-off barbarians have reached your walls, and over them taunt you in uncouth tones, then shall you hear how God can stammer. For these shall be the very voice of Him, and as He threatens you with captivity it shall be your bitterness to remember how by me He once offered you a rest and refreshing, which you refused. I tell you more. God will not only speak in words, but in deeds, and then truly your nickname for His message shall be fulfilled to you. Then shall the word of the Lord be unto you precept upon precept, precept upon precept, line upon line, line upon line, here a little and there a little. For God shall speak with the terrible simplicity and slowness of deeds, with the gradual growth of fate, with the monotonous stages of decay, till step by step you go, and stumble backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken. You have scorned my instruction as monosyllables fit for children! By[157] irritating monosyllables of gradual penalty shall God instruct you the second time."
But Isaiah hits them with their own words: "You call me a Stammerer! I’m telling you that God, who speaks through me and whom you mock in me, will one day talk to you in a way that will truly sound stammering to you. When those distant barbarians have reached your walls and mock you in harsh tones, then you will see how God can stammer. For this will be His very voice, and as He threatens you with captivity, it will be bitter for you to remember how through me He once offered you a rest and refreshing, which you turned down. I’ll say more. God will not only speak in words, but in actions, and then your nickname for His message will come true for you. The word of the Lord will be to you precept upon precept, precept upon precept, line upon line, line upon line, here a little and there a little. For God will speak with the terrible simplicity and slowness of deeds, with the gradual unfolding of fate, with the slow stages of decay, until step by step you go, and stumble backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken. You have looked down on my guidance as if it were simple words meant for children! By [157] irritating simple words of gradual consequence, God will instruct you a second time."
This is not only a very clever and cynical retort, but the statement of a moral principle. We gather from Isaiah that God speaks twice to men, first in words and then by deeds, but both times very simply and plainly. And if men deride and abuse the simplicity of the former, if they ignore moral and religious truths because they are elementary, and rebel against the quiet reiteration of simple voices, with which God sees it most healthy to conduct their education, then they shall be stunned by the commonplace pertinacity, with which the effects of their insolence work themselves out in life. God's ways with men are mostly commonplace; that is the hardest lesson we have to learn. The tongue of conscience speaks like the tongue of time, prevailingly by ticks and moments; not in undue excitement of soul and body, not in the stirring up of our passions nor by enlisting our ambitions, not in thunder nor in startling visions, but by everyday precepts of faithfulness, honour and purity, to which conscience has to rise unwinged by fancy or ambition, and dreadfully weighted with the dreariness of life. If we, carried away upon the rushing interests of the world, and with our appetite spoiled by the wealth and piquancy of intellectual knowledge, despise the simple monitions of conscience and Scripture, as uninteresting and childish, this is the risk we run,—that God will speak to us in another, and this time unshirkable, kind of commonplace. What that is we shall understand, when a career of dissipation or unscrupulous ambition has bereft life of all interest and joy, when one enthusiasm after another grows dull, and one pleasure after another tasteless, when all the little things of life preach to us of judgement, and [158]the grasshopper becometh a burden, and we, slowly descending through the drab and monotony of decay, suffer the last great commonplace, death. There can be no greater irony than for the soul, which has sinned by too greedily seeking for sensation, to find sensation absent even from the judgements she has brought upon herself. Poor Heine's Confessions acknowledge, at once with the appreciation of an artist and the pain of a victim, the satire, with which the Almighty inflicts, in the way that Isaiah describes, His penalties upon sins of sense.
This is not just a clever and cynical comeback, but also a statement of a moral principle. We learn from Isaiah that God communicates with people twice: first through words and then through actions, but both times in a very straightforward manner. If people mock and dismiss the simplicity of the first, if they overlook moral and religious truths because they seem basic, and rebel against the gentle repetition of the simple messages by which God chooses to educate them, then they will be taken aback by the ordinary persistence with which the consequences of their defiance manifest in life. God’s ways with people are mostly ordinary; that’s the hardest lesson we have to learn. The voice of conscience speaks like the passage of time, mainly through the ticks of a clock and moments; not through overwhelming excitement of spirit or body, not by rousing our emotions or fueling our ambitions, not in thunder or shocking visions, but through everyday guidelines of faithfulness, honor, and purity, to which conscience must respond without the wings of imagination or ambition, burdened by the dullness of life. If we get swept away by the rushing demands of the world and our desires become spoiled by the richness of intellectual knowledge, and we dismiss the simple reminders of conscience and Scripture as uninteresting and childish, we take a risk—that God will communicate with us in another, unavoidable kind of ordinary. What this is will become clear when a life of indulgence or unprincipled ambition has stripped existence of all interest and joy, when one enthusiasm after another fades away, and one pleasure after another becomes bland, when all the small aspects of life remind us of judgment, and [158]the grasshopper becomes a burden, as we slowly descend through the grayness and monotony of decay, facing the final ordinary reality, death. There can be no greater irony than for the soul that has sinned by chasing sensations too eagerly to find those sensations absent even from the judgments she has brought upon herself. Poor Heine's Confessions acknowledge, both with the appreciation of an artist and the pain of a victim, the satire with which the Almighty enforces, as Isaiah describes, His penalties for the sins of the senses.
III. Covenants with Death and Hell (vv. 14-22).
III. Agreements with Death and Hell (vv. 14-22).
To Isaiah's threats of destruction, the politicians of Jerusalem replied, We have bought destruction off! They meant some treaty with a foreign power. Diplomacy is always obscure, and at that distance its details are buried for us in impenetrable darkness. But we may safely conclude that it was either the treaty of Ahaz with Assyria, or some counter-treaty executed with Egypt since this power began again to rise into pretentiousness, or more probably still it was a secret agreement with the southern power, while the open treaty with the northern was yet in force. Isaiah, from the way in which he speaks, seems to have been in ignorance of all, except that the politician's boast was an unhallowed, underhand intrigue, accomplished by much swindling and false conceit of cleverness. This wretched subterfuge Isaiah exposes in some of the most powerful sentences he ever uttered. A faithless diplomacy was never more thoroughly laid bare, in its miserable mixture of political pedantry and falsehood.
To Isaiah's threats of destruction, the politicians of Jerusalem responded, "We've bought off destruction!" They were referring to some treaty with a foreign power. Diplomacy is always unclear, and at that distance, the details are lost to us in complete darkness. However, we can reasonably assume it was either the treaty of Ahaz with Assyria or some counter-treaty made with Egypt, as this power was starting to regain its arrogance, or perhaps it was a secret agreement with the southern power while the open treaty with the northern power was still valid. Isaiah, judging by his remarks, seems to have been unaware of all this, except that the politicians' boast was a corrupt, deceitful maneuver, achieved through a lot of trickery and false pride in their cleverness. Isaiah exposes this miserable excuse in some of the most powerful sentences he ever spoke. A disloyal diplomacy has never been more thoroughly revealed in its sad blend of political pretentiousness and lies.
Therefore hear the word of Jehovah, ye men of scorn, rulers of this people, which is in Jerusalem!
So listen to the word of the Lord, you mockers, leaders of this people in Jerusalem!
Because ye have said, We have entered into a covenant[159] with Death, and with Hell have we made a bargain; the "Overflowing Scourge," a current phrase of Isaiah's which they fling back in his teeth, when it passeth along, shall not come unto us, for we have set lies as our refuge, and in falsehood have we hidden ourselves [the prophet's penetrating scorn drags up into their boast the secret conscience of their hearts, that after all lies did form the basis of this political arrangement], therefore thus saith the Lord Jehovah: Behold, I lay in Zion for foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner-stone of sure foundation; he that believeth shall not make haste. No need of swift couriers to Egypt, and fret and fever of poor political brains in Jerusalem! The word make haste is onomatopoetic, like our fuss, and, if fuss may be applied to the conduct of high affairs of state, its exact equivalent in meaning.
Because you have said, "We have made a deal"[159] with Death, and we’ve struck a bargain with Hell; the 'Overflowing Scourge,' a common phrase from Isaiah that they throw back at him, when it comes along, will not reach us, for we have chosen lies as our refuge, and in falsehood we have sought protection [the prophet's sharp scorn reveals their hidden conscience, showing that lies were the foundation of this political agreement], therefore thus says the Lord God: Look, I lay in Zion a foundation stone, a tested stone, a precious cornerstone of a sure foundation; whoever believes will not hurry. No need for fast messengers to Egypt, and the worries and anxieties of poor political minds in Jerusalem! The word hurry is onomatopoeic, similar to our fuss, and, if fuss can describe the handling of important state matters, it has the same meaning.
And I will set justice for a line, and righteousness for a plummet, and hail shall sweep away the subterfuge of lies, and the secrecy shall waters overflow. And cancelled shall be your covenant with Death, and your bargain with Hell shall not stand.
I'll establish justice as a standard and righteousness as a measure. Hail will wash away the deception of lies, and secrecy will be flooded. Your agreement with Death will be revoked, and your deal with Hell won't hold up.
"The Overflowing Scourge," indeed! When it passeth over, then ye shall be unto it for trampling. As often as it passeth over, it shall take you away, for morning by morning shall it pass over, by day and by night. Then shall it be sheer terror to realize "the Message"! Too late then for anything else. Had you realized "the Message" now, what rest and refreshing! But then only terror.
"The Overflowing Scourge," indeed! When it passes over, you'll be trampled by it. Every time it moves through, it will take you away, as it comes morning by morning, day and night. Then it will be pure terror to understand "the Message"! It will be too late for anything else. If you understood "the Message" now, there would be rest and refreshment! But instead, there will only be terror.
For the bed is shorter than that a man can stretch himself upon it, and the covering narrower than that he can wrap himself in it. This proverb seems to be struck out of the prophet by the belief of the politicians, that they are creating a stable and restful policy for[160] Judah. It flashes an aspect of hopeless uneasiness over the whole political situation. However they make their bed, with Egypt's or Assyria's help, they shall not find it comfortable. No cleverness of theirs can create a satisfactory condition of affairs, no political arrangement, nothing short of faith, of absolute reliance on that bare foundation-stone laid in Zion,—God's assurance that Jerusalem is inviolable.
For the bed is too short for a man to stretch out on it, and the blanket is too small for him to wrap himself in it. This saying seems to come from the prophet due to the politicians' belief that they are building a stable and restful policy for[160] Judah. It casts a shadow of hopeless unease over the entire political situation. No matter how they make their bed, whether with Egypt's or Assyria's assistance, they won’t find it comfortable. No amount of cleverness can create a satisfactory situation, no political arrangement, nothing less than faith, and total reliance on that solid foundation laid in Zion—God's promise that Jerusalem is untouchable.
For Jehovah shall arise as on Mount Peratsim; He shall be stirred as in the valley of Gibeon, to do His deed—strange is this deed of His, and to bring to pass His act—strange is His act.
For Jehovah will rise as he did on Mount Peratsim; He will be stirred as He was in the valley of Gibeon, to carry out His purpose—this purpose of His is unusual, and to bring about His actions—His actions are remarkable.
Now, therefore, play no more the scorner, lest your bands be made tight, for a consumption, and that determined, have I heard from the Lord, Jehovah of hosts, upon the whole earth. This finishes the matter. Possibility of alliance there is for sane men nowhere in this world of Western Asia, so evidently near convulsion. Only the foundation-stone in Zion shall be left. Cling to that!
So, stop being sarcastic, or you’ll end up in a tight spot, because I’ve heard from the Lord, Jehovah of hosts, that a disaster is coming for the whole earth. This settles the issue. There is no chance for sensible partnerships in this world of Western Asia, which is clearly on the brink of upheaval. Only the cornerstone in Zion will remain. Hold on to that!
When the pedantic members of the General Assembly of the Kirk of Scotland, in the year 1650, were clinging with all the grip of their hard logic, but with very little heart, to the "Divine right of kings," and attempting an impossible state, whose statute-book was to be the Westminster Confession, and its chief executive officer King Charles II., Cromwell, then encamped at Musselburgh, sent them that letter in which the famous sentence occurs: "I beseech you in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be mistaken. Precept may be upon precept, line may be upon line," he goes on to say, "and yet the Word of the Lord may be to some a word of Judgement; that they may fall backward, and be broken, and be snared, and be taken! There may be a spiritual fulness, which the world may[161] call drunkenness; as in the second Chapter of the Acts. There may be, as well, a carnal confidence upon misunderstood and misapplied precepts, which may be called spiritual drunkenness. There may be a Covenant made with Death and Hell! I will not say yours was so. But judge if such things have a politic aim: To avoid the overflowing scourge; or, To accomplish worldly interests? And if therein you have confederated with wicked and carnal men, and have respect for them, or otherwise have drawn them in to associate with us, Whether this be a covenant of God and spiritual? Bethink yourselves; we hope we do.
When the detail-focused members of the General Assembly of the Kirk of Scotland, in the year 1650, were tightly holding onto the "Divine right of kings" with all their logical arguments but very little compassion, and trying to create an impossible state ruled by the Westminster Confession with King Charles II. as its main leader, Cromwell, who was camped at Musselburgh, sent them a letter that included the famous line: "I beg you, in the name of Christ, consider the possibility that you could be wrong. Precepts may come upon precepts, and lines may come upon lines," he continued, "and yet the Word of the Lord may be a word of Judgment for some; they may stumble backward, be broken, ensnared, and taken! There may be a spiritual fullness that the world might call drunkenness, as described in the second chapter of the Acts. There can also be a misplaced confidence in misunderstood and misapplied precepts that might be referred to as spiritual drunkenness. A Covenant could be made with Death and Hell! I won’t say yours was one. But consider whether such things have political motives: To escape the overwhelming scourge; or, To fulfill earthly interests? And if you have allied yourselves with wicked and worldly people, and have given them respect, or if you have encouraged them to associate with us, then is this truly a covenant with God and of the spirit? Think carefully; we hope we are doing so.
"I pray you read the Twenty-eighth of Isaiah, from the fifth to the fifteenth verse. And do not scorn to know that it is the Spirit that quickens and giveth life."[30]
"I urge you to read the twenty-eighth chapter of Isaiah, from the fifth to the fifteenth verse. And do not underestimate the fact that it is the Spirit that brings life and vitality."[30]
Cromwell, as we have said, is the best commentator Isaiah has ever had, and that by an instinct born, not only of the same faith, but of experience in tackling similar sorts of character. In this letter he is dealing, like Isaiah, with stubborn pedants, who are endeavouring to fasten the national fortunes upon a Procrustean policy. The diplomacy of Jerusalem was very clever; the Covenanting ecclesiasticism of Edinburgh was logical and consistent. But a Jewish alliance with Assyria and the attempt of Scotsmen to force their covenant upon the whole United Kingdom were equally sheer impossibilities. In either case the bed was shorter than that a man could stretch himself on it, and the covering narrower than that he could wrap himself in it. Both, too, were covenants with Death and Hell; for if the attempt of the Scots to secure Charles II.[162] by the Covenant was free from the falsehood of Jewish diplomacy, it was fatally certain if successful to have led to the subversion of their highest religious interests; and history has proved that Cromwell was no more than just in applying to it the strong expressions, which Isaiah uses of Judah's ominous treaties with the unscrupulous heathen. Over against so pedantic an idea, as that of forcing the life of the three nations into the mould of the one Covenant, and so fatal a folly as the attempt to commit the interests of religion to the keeping of the dissolute and perjured king, Cromwell stands in his great toleration of everything but unrighteousness and his strong conviction of three truths:—that the religious life of Great Britain and Ireland was too rich and varied for the Covenant: that national and religious interests so complicated and precious could be decided only upon the plainest principles of faith and justice: and that, tested by these principles, Charles II. and his crew were as utterly without worth to the nation and as pregnant with destruction, as Isaiah felt Assyria and Egypt to be to Judah. The battle-cries of the two parties at Dunbar are significant of the spiritual difference between them. That of the Scots was "The Covenant!" Cromwell's was Isaiah's own, "The Lord of hosts!" However logical, religious and sincere theirs might be, it was at the best a scheme of men too narrow for events, and fatally compromised by its association with Charles II. But Cromwell's battle-cry required only a moderately sincere faith from those who adopted it, to ensure their victory. For to them it meant just what it had meant to Isaiah, loyalty to a Divine providence, supreme in righteousness, the willingness to be guided by events, interpreting them by no tradition or scheme, but only[163] by conscience. He who understands this will be able to see which side was right in that strange civil war, where both so sincerely claimed to be Scriptural.
Cromwell, as we mentioned, is the best interpreter Isaiah has ever had, driven not only by the same faith but also by experience with similar types of characters. In this letter, he is confronting, like Isaiah, stubborn intellectuals who are trying to pin the nation's future to a rigid policy. The diplomacy of Jerusalem was very clever; the Covenanting religious leaders of Edinburgh were logical and consistent. However, forming a Jewish alliance with Assyria and Scots trying to impose their covenant across the entire United Kingdom were both impossible. In either case, the bed was shorter than a man could stretch himself on it, and the covering narrower than he could wrap himself in it. Both situations represented agreements with Death and Hell; for if the Scots' attempt to secure Charles II. by the Covenant was free from the deceit of Jewish diplomacy, it was bound to undermine their own highest religious interests if it succeeded. History has shown that Cromwell was justified in applying the strong terms Isaiah used for Judah's troubling treaties with the unscrupulous pagans. Against such a pedantic notion as forcing the lives of the three nations into the shape of a single Covenant, and such a disastrous folly as trusting the interests of religion to a corrupt and deceitful king, Cromwell stood firm in his deep tolerance of everything except injustice and his strong belief in three truths: that the religious life of Great Britain and Ireland was too rich and diverse for the Covenant; that national and religious interests, so complex and valuable, could only be settled based on the clearest principles of faith and justice; and that, measured by these principles, Charles II. and his followers were utterly worthless to the nation and dangerously destructive, just as Isaiah viewed Assyria and Egypt in relation to Judah. The battle cries of the two sides at Dunbar highlight the spiritual difference between them. The Scots shouted, "The Covenant!" while Cromwell’s was Isaiah's own, "The Lord of hosts!" No matter how logical, religious, and sincere the Scots were, at best, it was a narrow-minded plan that couldn’t adapt to events and was fatally compromised by its connection with Charles II. But Cromwell's battle cry required only moderate sincerity from those who embraced it to ensure victory. It represented, for them, what it meant to Isaiah—loyalty to a Divine providence, supreme in righteousness, a readiness to be guided by current events, interpreting them without any tradition or plan but solely through conscience. Whoever understands this will be able to see which side was right in that strange civil war, where both sides sincerely claimed to align with Scripture.
It may be wondered why we spend so much argument on comparing the attempt to force Charles II. into the Solemn League and Covenant with the impious treaty of Judah with the heathen. But the argument has not been wasted, if it have shown how even sincere and religious men may make covenants with death, and even Church creeds and constitutions become beds too short that a man may lie upon them, coverings narrower than that he can wrap himself in them. Not once or twice has it happened that an old and hallowed constitution has become, in the providence of God, unfit for the larger life of a people or of a Church, and yet is clung to by parties in that Church or people from motives of theological pedantry or ecclesiastical cowardice. Sooner or later a crisis is sure to arrive, in which the defective creed has to match itself against some interest of justice; and then endless compromises have to be entertained, that discover themselves perilously like bargains with hell. If we of this generation have to make a public application of the twenty-eighth chapter of Isaiah, it lies in this direction. There are few things, to which his famous proverb of the short bed can be applied more aptly, than to the attempt to fasten down the religious life and thought of the present age too rigorously upon a creed of the fashion of two or three hundred years ago.
It might be surprising why we spend so much time arguing about the effort to force Charles II into the Solemn League and Covenant, comparing it to the ungodly treaty of Judah with the nonbelievers. However, this argument hasn’t been in vain if it has revealed how even sincere and faithful people can make agreements that lead to ruin, and how church creeds and constitutions can become inadequate, making it impossible for anyone to find comfort in them. It’s happened before that an old and respected constitution has, through divine intervention, become unsuitable for the broader life of a community or church, yet some factions within that church or community hold onto it out of theological stubbornness or fear. Eventually, a crisis will arise in which a flawed creed has to confront a matter of justice; then endless compromises are made that end up looking disturbingly like bargains with hell. If we, in this generation, need to apply the twenty-eighth chapter of Isaiah publicly, it leads us in this direction. Few things can illustrate his well-known saying about the short bed better than the attempt to rigidly bind the religious life and thought of today to a creed from two or three hundred years ago.
But Isaiah's words have wider application. Short of faith as he exemplified it, there is no possibility for the spirit of man to be free from uneasiness. It is so all along the scale of human endeavour. No power of patience or of hope is his, who cannot imagine possibilities[164] of truth outside his own opinions, nor trust a justice larger than his private rights. It is here very often that the real test of our faith meets us. If we seek to fit life solely to the conception of our privileges, if in the preaching of our opinions no mystery of higher truth awe us at least into reverence and caution; then, whatever religious creeds we profess, we are not men of faith, but shall surely inherit the bitterness and turmoil that are the portion of unbelievers. If we make it the chief aim of our politics to drive cheap bargains for our trade or to be consistent to party or class interests; if we trim our conscience to popular opinion; if we sell our honesty in business or our love in marriage, that we may be comfortable in the world; then, however firmly we be established in reputation or in welfare, we have given our spiritual nature a support utterly inadequate to its needs, and we shall never find rest. Sooner or later, a man must feel the pinch of having cut his life short of the demands of conscience. Only a generous loyalty to her decrees will leave him freedom of heart and room for his arm to swing. Nor will any philosophy, however comprehensive, nor poetic fancy, however elastic, be able without the complement of faith to arrange, to account for, or to console us for, the actual facts of experience. It is only belief in the God of Isaiah, a true and loving God, omnipotent Ruler of our life, that can bring us peace. There was never a sorrow, that did not find explanation in that, never a tired thought, that would not cling to it. There are no interests so scattered nor energies so far-reaching that there is not return and rest for them under the shadow of His wings. He that believeth shall not make haste. Be still, says a psalm of the same date as Isaiah—Be still, and know that I am God.[165]
But Isaiah's words apply to a broader context. Without faith as he showed it, there’s no way for the human spirit to be free from worry. This holds true across all areas of human effort. No amount of patience or hope belongs to someone who can’t envision possibilities of truth beyond their own views, nor trust in a justice greater than their personal rights. This is often where the real test of our faith encounters us. If we try to shape life only around our own privileges, if our opinions don’t leave room for a higher truth that inspires awe, then regardless of the religious beliefs we claim, we aren't truly people of faith and will inevitably inherit the bitterness and chaos that come with disbelief. If we make it our main goal in politics to secure cheap deals for our business or to stay loyal to party or class interests; if we adjust our conscience to fit popular opinion; if we compromise our honesty in business or our love in relationships just to be comfortable in society; then, no matter how established we are in reputation or security, we have provided our spiritual nature with support that simply can’t satisfy its needs, and we will never find peace. Eventually, a person must feel the strain of having restricted their life from the demands of conscience. Only a generous loyalty to those demands will leave them with freedom of heart and the ability to act. No philosophy, no matter how all-encompassing, nor poetic imagination, no matter how flexible, can without faith arrange, explain, or comfort us regarding the real facts of experience. Only belief in the God of Isaiah, a true and loving God, the all-powerful Ruler of our lives, can bring us peace. There has never been a sorrow that couldn’t find understanding within that belief, nor a weary thought that wouldn’t cling to it. There are no interests so scattered or energies so broad that they can’t find return and rest under the shadow of His wings. He that believes shall not be in a hurry. Be still, says a psalm from the same time as Isaiah—Be still, and know that I am God.[165]
IV. The Almighty the All-methodical (vv. 23-29).
IV. The Almighty the All-methodical (vv. 23-29).
The patience of faith, which Isaiah has so nobly preached, he now proceeds to vindicate by reason. But the vindication implies that his audience are already in another mood. From confidence in their clever diplomacy, heedless of the fact that God has His own purposes concerning them, they have swung round to despair before His judgements. Their despair, however, is due to the same fault as their careless confidence—the forgetfulness that God works by counsel and method. Even a calamity, so universal and extreme as that, of whose certainty the prophet has now convinced them, has its measure and its term. To persuade the crushed and superstitious Jews of this, Isaiah employs a parable. "You know," he says, "the husbandman. Have you ever seen him keep on harrowing and breaking the clods of his land for mere sport, and without farther intention? Does not the harrowing time lead to the sowing time? Or again, when he threshes his crops, does he thresh for ever? Is threshing the end he has in view? Look, how he varies the rigour of his instrument by the kind of plant he threshes. For delicate plants, like fitches and cummin, he does not use the threshing sledge with the sharp teeth, or the lumbering roller, but the fitches are beaten out with a staff and the cummin with a rod. And in the case of bread corn, which needs his roller and horses, he does not use these upon it till it is all crushed to dust." The application of this parable is very evident. If the husbandman be so methodical and careful, shall the God who taught him not also be so? If the violent treatment of land and fruits be so measured and adapted for their greater fruitfulness and purity, ought we not to trust God to have the same intentions[166] in His violent treatment of His people? Isaiah here returns to his fundamental gospel: that the Almighty is the All-methodical, too. Men forget this. In their times of activity they think God indifferent; they are too occupied with their own schemes for shaping life, to imagine that He has any. In days of suffering, again, when disaster bursts, they conceive of God only as force and vengeance. Yet, says Isaiah, Jehovah of hosts is wonderful in counsel, and excellent in that sort of wisdom which causes things to succeed. This last word of the chapter is very expressive. It literally means furtherance, help, salvation, and then the true wisdom or insight which ensures these: the wisdom which carries things through. It splendidly sums up Isaiah's gospel to the Jews, cowering like dogs before the coming calamity: God is not mere force or vengeance. His judgements are not chaos. But He is wonderful in counsel, and all His ways have furtherance or salvation for their end.
The patience of faith, which Isaiah has preached so nobly, he now defends with reason. However, his defense assumes that his audience is already in a different mindset. They’ve shifted from confidence in their smart diplomacy, ignoring the fact that God has His own plans for them, to despair in the face of His judgments. This despair, though, stems from the same flaw as their careless confidence—the forgetfulness that God works with purpose and method. Even a disaster as widespread and severe as the one the prophet has convinced them of has its limits and duration. To help the crushed and superstitious Jews understand this, Isaiah uses a parable. “You know,” he says, “the farmer. Have you ever seen him endlessly harrowing and breaking the clods of his land just for fun and without any further intention? Doesn’t the harrowing process lead to the sowing time? Or when he threshes his crops, does he thresh forever? Is threshing the ultimate goal? Look how he adjusts the intensity of his tools based on the type of plant he’s threshing. For delicate plants, like fitches and cummin, he doesn’t use the threshing sledge with sharp teeth or the heavy roller; he beats the fitches with a staff and the cummin with a rod. But for bread corn, which needs his roller and horses, he doesn’t use them until it’s all crushed to dust.” The meaning of this parable is very clear. If the farmer is so methodical and careful, wouldn’t the God who taught him be the same? If the harsh treatment of soil and crops is so measured and tailored for their greater productivity and quality, shouldn’t we trust that God has the same intentions[166] in His harsh treatment of His people? Isaiah returns to his fundamental message: that the Almighty is also All-methodical. People forget this. In their busy moments, they think God is indifferent; they are too wrapped up in their own plans to believe that He has any. During times of suffering, when disaster strikes, they see God only as a force of retribution. Yet, says Isaiah, Jehovah of hosts is wonderful in counsel and excellent in that wisdom that leads to success. This last point in the chapter is very expressive. It literally means advancement, help, salvation, and then the true wisdom or insight that ensures these: the wisdom that carries things through. It beautifully summarizes Isaiah's message to the Jews, who are cowering like dogs before the impending disaster: God is not merely force or vengeance. His judgments aren't chaos. But He is wonderful in counsel, and all His ways have advancement or salvation as their goal.
We have said this is one of the finest prophecies of Isaiah. His political foresight was admirable, when he alone of his countrymen predicted the visitation of Assyria upon Judah. But now, when all are convinced of it, how still more wonderful does he seem facing that novel disaster, with the whole world's force behind it, and declaring its limit. He has not the temptation, so strong in prophets of judgement, to be a mere disaster-monger, and leave judgement on the horizon unrelieved. Nor is he afraid, as other predicters of evil have been, of the monster he has summoned to the land. The secret of this is that from the first he predicted the Assyrian invasion, not out of any private malice nor merely by superior political foresight, but because he knew—and knew, as he tells us, by the inspiration of God's own Spirit—that God required such an instrument[167] to punish the unrighteousness of Judah. If the enemy was summoned by God at the first, surely till the last the enemy shall be in God's hand.
We've mentioned that this is one of Isaiah's greatest prophecies. His political insight was impressive, as he was the only one in his country who predicted the Assyrian invasion of Judah. But now, when everyone believes it, he seems even more remarkable as he faces this unprecedented disaster, with the full force of the world behind it, and declares its limits. He doesn't fall into the trap, so common among prophets of judgment, of being nothing but a disaster-bringer, leaving judgment on the horizon without relief. Nor does he fear, like other doom-sayers, the monster he has called to the land. The reason for this is that from the very beginning, he predicted the Assyrian invasion, not out of any personal spite or just superior political insight, but because he understood—and stated, as he tells us, through the inspiration of God's Spirit—that God needed such an instrument[167] to punish Judah's wickedness. If God summoned the enemy in the beginning, then until the end, the enemy will remain in God's control.
To this enemy we are now to see Isaiah turn with the same message he has delivered to the men of Jerusalem.
To this enemy, we now see Isaiah turn with the same message he has given to the people of Jerusalem.
CHAPTER IX.
ATHEISM OF FORCE AND ATHEISM OF FEAR.
Isaiah x. 5-34 (ABOUT 721 B.C.).
Isaiah x. 5-34 (ABOUT 721 B.C.).
In chap. xxviii. Isaiah, speaking in the year 725 when Salmanassar IV. was marching on Samaria, had explained to the politicians of Jerusalem how entirely the Assyrian host was in the hand of Jehovah for the punishment of Samaria and the punishment and purification of Judah. The invasion which in that year loomed so awful was not unbridled force of destruction, implying the utter annihilation of God's people, as Damascus, Arpad and Hamath had been annihilated. It was Jehovah's instrument for purifying His people, with its appointed term and its glorious intentions of fruitfulness and peace.
In chapter 28, Isaiah, speaking in 725 B.C. when Shalmaneser IV was advancing on Samaria, explained to the leaders in Jerusalem how completely the Assyrian army was under Jehovah’s control for the purpose of punishing Samaria and cleansing Judah. The invasion that seemed so terrifying that year was not just a wild force of destruction that would completely wipe out God’s people, as had happened to Damascus, Arpad, and Hamath. It was Jehovah’s tool for purifying His people, with its set duration and noble intentions of bringing about prosperity and peace.
In the tenth chapter Isaiah turns with this truth to defy the Assyrian himself. It is four years later. Samaria has fallen. The judgement, which the prophet spoke upon the luxurious capital, has been fulfilled. All Ephraim is an Assyrian province. Judah stands for the first time face to face with Assyria. From Samaria to the borders of Judah is not quite two days' march, to the walls of Jerusalem a little over two. Now shall the Jews be able to put to the test their prophet's[169] promise! What can possibly prevent Sargon from making Zion as Samaria, and carrying her people away in the track of the northern tribes to captivity?
In the tenth chapter, Isaiah directly confronts the Assyrian. It’s four years later. Samaria has fallen. The judgment that the prophet declared against the lavish capital has come true. All of Ephraim is now an Assyrian province. For the first time, Judah faces Assyria. The journey from Samaria to the borders of Judah is just under two days’ march, and a little over two days to the walls of Jerusalem. Now the Jews will have the chance to test their prophet’s[169] promise! What could possibly stop Sargon from making Zion like Samaria and taking its people away just like the northern tribes?
There was a very fallacious human reason, and there was a very sound Divine one.
There was a very misleading human reason, and there was a very solid Divine one.
The fallacious human reason was the alliance which Ahaz had made with Assyria. In what state that alliance now was, does not clearly appear, but the most optimist of the Assyrian party at Jerusalem could not, after all that had happened, be feeling quite comfortable about it. The Assyrian was as unscrupulous as themselves. There was too much impetus in the rush of his northern floods to respect a tiny province like Judah, treaty or no treaty. Besides, Sargon had as good reason to suspect Jerusalem of intriguing with Egypt, as he had against Samaria or the Philistine cities; and the Assyrian kings had already shown their meaning of the covenant with Ahaz by stripping Judah of enormous tribute.
The flawed reasoning of humanity was the alliance Ahaz formed with Assyria. The current state of that alliance isn’t clear, but even the most optimistic supporters of Assyria in Jerusalem couldn’t feel entirely at ease after everything that had happened. The Assyrians were just as ruthless as they were. They had too much momentum in their northern advances to pay any respect to a small province like Judah, treaty or not. Plus, Sargon had just as much reason to doubt Jerusalem’s dealings with Egypt as he did with Samaria or the Philistine cities; and the Assyrian kings had already demonstrated their interpretation of the agreement with Ahaz by demanding huge tributes from Judah.
So Isaiah discounts in this prophecy Judah's treaty with Assyria. He speaks as if nothing was likely to prevent the Assyrian's immediate march upon Jerusalem. He puts into Sargon's mouth the intention of this, and makes him boast of the ease with which it can be accomplished (vv. 7-11). In the end of the prophecy he even describes the probable itinerary of the invader from the borders of Judah to his arrival on the heights, over against the Holy City (vv. 27 last clause to 32).[31]
So Isaiah dismisses Judah's alliance with Assyria in this prophecy. He implies that nothing will stop the Assyrian's quick advance on Jerusalem. He attributes to Sargon the intent to do this and has him brag about how easily it can be done (vv. 7-11). At the end of the prophecy, he even outlines the likely route the invader will take from the borders of Judah to his arrival on the hills facing the Holy City (vv. 27 last clause to 32).[31]
Cometh up from the North the Destroyer.
The Destroyer comes up from the North.
[170]He is come upon Ai; marcheth through Migron; at Michmash musters his baggage.
[170]He has arrived at Ai; is marching through Migron; at Michmash, he is organizing his supplies.
They have passed through the Pass; "Let Geba be our bivouac."
They have made it through the Pass; "Let's use Geba as our campsite."
Terror-struck is Ramah; Gibeah of Saul hath fled.
Ramah is filled with terror; Gibeah of Saul has run away.
Make shrill thy voice, O daughter of Gallim! Listen, Laishah! Answer her, Anathoth!
Raise your voice, daughter of Gallim! Listen, Laishah! Respond to her, Anathoth!
In mad flight is Madmenah; the dwellers in Gebim gather their stuff to flee.
Madmenah is in a wild rush; the people in Gebim are gathering their belongings to escape.
This very day he halteth at Nob; he waveth his hand at the Mount of the Daughter of Zion, the Hill of Jerusalem.
Today he stops at Nob; he waves his hand at the Mount of the Daughter of Zion, the Hill of Jerusalem.
This is not actual fact; but it is vision of what may take place to-day or to-morrow. For there is nothing—not even that miserable treaty—to prevent such a violation of Jewish territory, within which, it ought to be kept in mind, lie all the places named by the prophet.
This is not a factual statement; rather, it's a vision of what might happen today or tomorrow. There's nothing—not even that dreadful treaty—to stop such an invasion of Jewish territory, which, it should be remembered, includes all the places mentioned by the prophet.
But the invasion of Judah and the arrival of the Assyrian on the heights over against Jerusalem does not mean that the Holy City and the shrine of Jehovah of hosts are to be destroyed; does not mean that all the prophecies of Isaiah about the security of this rallying-place for the remnant of God's people are to be annulled, and Israel annihilated. For just at the moment of the Assyrian's triumph, when he brandishes his hand over Jerusalem, as if he would harry it like a bird's nest, Isaiah beholds him struck down, and crash like the fall of a whole Lebanon of cedars (vv. 33, 34).
But the invasion of Judah and the arrival of the Assyrian forces on the hills opposite Jerusalem doesn’t mean that the Holy City and the temple of the Lord of Hosts are going to be destroyed; it doesn’t mean that all of Isaiah's prophecies about the safety of this stronghold for the remnant of God’s people will be canceled out, and that Israel will be wiped out. For just at the moment of the Assyrian's victory, when he raises his hand over Jerusalem, as if he intends to attack it like a bird's nest, Isaiah sees him struck down, crashing down like the fall of an entire grove of cedars from Lebanon (vv. 33, 34).
Behold the Lord, Jehovah of hosts, lopping the topmost boughs with a sudden crash,
Look, the Lord, Jehovah of armies, cutting down the highest branches with a sudden crash,
And the high ones of stature hewn down, and the lofty are brought low!
And the tall ones are cut down, and the proud are brought low!
Yea, He moweth down the thickets of the forest with iron, and Lebanon by a Mighty One falleth.
Yes, He cuts down the thickets of the forest with iron, and Lebanon falls by a Mighty One.
[171]All this is poetry. We are not to suppose that the prophet actually expected the Assyrian to take the route, which he has laid down for him with so much detail. As a matter of fact, Sargon did not advance across the Jewish frontier, but turned away by the coast-land of Philistia to meet his enemy of Egypt, whom he defeated at Rafia, and then went home to Nineveh, leaving Judah alone. And, although some twenty years later the Assyrian did appear before Jerusalem, as threatening as Isaiah describes, and was cut down in as sudden and miraculous a manner, yet it was not by the itinerary Isaiah here marked for him that he came, but in quite another direction: from the south-west. What Isaiah merely insists upon is that there is nothing in that wretched treaty of Ahaz—that fallacious human reason—to keep Sargon from overrunning Judah to the very walls of Jerusalem, but that, even though he does so, there is a most sure Divine reason for the Holy City remaining inviolate.
[171]All this is poetry. We shouldn't think that the prophet really expected the Assyrian to follow the detailed route he laid out. In reality, Sargon didn't cross the Jewish border but instead went along the coast of Philistia to confront his enemy in Egypt, whom he defeated at Rafia, and then returned home to Nineveh, leaving Judah untouched. Although about twenty years later the Assyrian did come before Jerusalem, as threatening as Isaiah depicted, and was defeated in a sudden and miraculous way, he didn't approach as Isaiah described but came from a completely different direction: the southwest. What Isaiah emphasizes is that there's nothing in that miserable treaty of Ahaz— that flawed human reasoning—that stops Sargon from invading Judah up to the very gates of Jerusalem, but even if he does, there is a certain Divine reason for the Holy City to remain unharmed.
The Assyrian expected to take Jerusalem. But he is not his own master. Though he knows it not, and his only instinct is that of destruction (ver. 7), he is the rod in God's hand. And when God shall have used him for the needed punishment of Judah, then will God visit upon him his arrogance and brutality. This man, who says he will exploit the whole earth as he harries a bird's nest (ver. 14), who believes in nothing but himself, saying, By the strength of my hand I have done it, and by my wisdom, for I am prudent, is but the instrument of God, and all his boasting is that of the axe against him that heweth therewith and of the saw against him that wieldeth it. As if, says the prophet, with a scorn still fresh for those who make material force the ultimate power in the universe—[172]As if a rod should shake them that lift it up, or as if a staff should lift up him that is not wood. By the way, Isaiah has a word for his countrymen. What folly is theirs, who now put all their trust in this world-force, and at another time cower in abject fear before it! Must he again bid them look higher, and see that Assyria is only the agent in God's work of first punishing the whole land, but afterwards redeeming His people! In the midst of denunciation the prophet's stern voice breaks into the promise of this later hope (vv. 24-27a); and at last the crash of the fallen Assyrian is scarcely still, before Isaiah has begun to declare a most glorious future of grace for Israel. But this carries us over into the eleventh chapter, and we had better first of all gather up the lessons of the tenth.
The Assyrian expected to take Jerusalem. But he is not in control. Though he doesn’t realize it, and his only instinct is to destroy (ver. 7), he is the tool in God’s hand. And when God has used him to punish Judah as needed, then God will repay him for his arrogance and brutality. This man, who claims he will exploit the whole earth as easily as raiding a bird's nest (ver. 14), who believes in nothing but himself, saying, By the strength of my hand I have done it, and by my wisdom, for I am clever, is just an instrument of God, and all his boasting is like the axe talking back to the man who uses it and the saw talking back to the one who wields it. As if, says the prophet, with fresh contempt for those who see material power as the ultimate force in the universe—[172]As if a rod could shake those who lift it up, or as if a staff could lift up someone who is not wood. By the way, Isaiah has a message for his countrymen. How foolish they are, who now put all their trust in this worldly power, and at other times cower in fear before it! Must he once again urge them to look higher and see that Assyria is only the agent of God, first punishing the whole land, and then redeeming His people! In the midst of his warnings, the prophet’s stern voice breaks into the promise of later hope (vv. 24-27a); and just as the crash of the fallen Assyrian is barely fading, Isaiah begins to proclaim a glorious future of grace for Israel. But this moves us to the eleventh chapter, and we should first gather the lessons of the tenth.
This prophecy of Isaiah contains a great Gospel and two great Protests, which the prophet was enabled to make in the strength of it: one against the Atheism of Force, and one against the Atheism of Fear.
This prophecy of Isaiah holds a powerful Gospel and two significant Protests that the prophet was able to deliver with its strength: one against the Atheism of Force, and one against the Atheism of Fear.
The Gospel of the chapter is just that which we have already emphasized as the gospel par excellence of Isaiah: the Lord exalted in righteousness, God supreme over the supremest men and forces of the world. But we now see it carried to a height of daring not reached before. This was the first time that any man faced the sovereign force of the world in the full sweep of victory, and told himself and his fellow-men: "This is not travelling in the greatness of its own strength, but is simply a dead, unconscious instrument in the hand of God." Let us, at the cost of a little repetition, get at the heart of this. We shall find it wonderfully modern.
The Gospel of this chapter is exactly what we've already pointed out as the ultimate gospel of Isaiah: the Lord exalted in righteousness, God supreme over the greatest leaders and forces in the world. But now we see it taken to an unprecedented level of boldness. This was the first time anyone confronted the ultimate power of the world in total victory and told themselves and others: "This isn't about relying on its own greatness; it's just a lifeless, unconscious tool in the hands of God." Let's, with a bit of repetition, get to the core of this. We'll find it strikingly relevant today.
Belief in God had hitherto been local and circumscribed. Each nation, as Isaiah tells us, had walked in[173] the name of its god, and limited his power and prevision to its own life and territory. We do not blame the peoples for this. Their conception of God was narrow, because their life was narrow, and they confined the power of their deity to their own borders because, in fact, their thoughts seldom strayed beyond. But now the barriers, that had so long enclosed mankind in narrow circles, were being broken down. Men's thoughts travelled through the breaches, and learned that outside their fatherland there lay the world. Their lives thereupon widened immensely, but their theologies stood still. They felt the great forces which shook the world, but their gods remained the same petty, provincial deities. Then came this great Assyrian power, hurtling through the nations, laughing at their gods as idols, boasting that it was by his own strength he overcame them, and to simple eyes making good his boast as he harried the whole earth like a bird's nest. No wonder that men's hearts were drawn from the unseen spiritualities to this very visible brutality! No wonder all real faith in the gods seemed to be dying out, and that men made it the business of their lives to seek peace with this world-force, that was carrying everything, including the gods themselves, before it! Mankind was in danger of practical atheism: of placing, as Isaiah tells us, the ultimate faith which belongs to a righteous God in this brute force: of substituting embassies for prayers, tribute for sacrifice, and the tricks and compromises of diplomacy for the endeavour to live a holy and righteous life. Behold, what questions were at issue: questions that have come up again and again in the history of human thought, and that are tugging at us to-day harder than ever!—whether the visible, sensible[174] forces of the universe, that break so rudely in upon our primitive theologies, are what we men have to make our peace with, or whether there is behind them a Being, who wields them for purposes, far transcending them, of justice and of love; whether, in short, we are to be materialists or believers in God. It is the same old, ever-new debate. The factors of it have only changed a little as we have become more learned. Where Isaiah felt the Assyrians, we are confronted by the evolution of nature and history, and the material forces into which it sometimes looks ominously like as if these could be analysed. Everything that has come forcibly and gloriously to the front of things, every drift that appears to dominate history, all that asserts its claim on our wonder, and offers its own simple and strong solution of our life—is our Assyria. It is precisely now, as then, a rush of new powers across the horizon of our knowledge, which makes the God, who was sufficient for the narrower knowledge of yesterday, seem petty and old-fashioned to-day. This problem no generation can escape, whose vision of the world has become wider than that of its predecessors. But Isaiah's greatness lay in this: that it was given to him to attack the problem the first time it presented itself to humanity with any serious force, and that he applied to it the only sure solution—a more lofty and spiritual view of God than the one which it had found wanting. We may thus paraphrase his argument: "Give me a God who is more than a national patron, give me a God who cares only for righteousness, and I say that every material force the world exhibits is nothing but subordinate to Him. Brute force cannot be anything but an instrument, an axe, a saw, something essentially mechanical and in need of an arm to lift it. Postulate[175] a supreme and righteous Ruler of the world, and you not only have all its movements explained, but may rest assured, that it shall only be permitted to execute justice and purify men. The world cannot prevent their salvation, if God have willed this."
Belief in God had previously been limited and specific to each nation. As Isaiah pointed out, each nation walked in the name of its god, restricting his power and foresight to their own lives and land. We don't blame the people for this. Their view of God was narrow because their lives were narrow, and they confined their deity's power to their borders because, honestly, their thoughts rarely ventured beyond. But now, the barriers that had long kept humanity in tight circles were coming down. People's thoughts crossed these gaps and learned that beyond their homeland lay the world. Their lives expanded immensely, but their beliefs stayed stagnant. They felt the powerful forces shaking the world, yet their gods remained the same small, local deities. Then came this powerful Assyrian empire, sweeping through nations, mocking their gods as mere idols, boasting that it was through its own strength that it overcame them, and to naive observers, proving its claim as it devastated the earth like a bird's nest. It’s no wonder that people's hearts were drawn away from abstract spiritualities to this very tangible brutality! No wonder genuine faith in the gods seemed to fade, leading people to make it their life's mission to seek peace with this world force that was sweeping everything, including the gods, along with it! Humanity was at risk of practical atheism: of putting, as Isaiah says, the ultimate faith that belongs to a righteous God in this brute force: of substituting diplomacy for prayers, tribute for sacrifice, and the tricks and compromises of politics for the effort to live a holy and righteous life. Look at the fundamental questions at stake: questions that have continually arisen throughout human history and are pulling at us today more than ever!—whether the visible, tangible forces of the universe, which intrude so harshly on our simple theologies, are what we must make peace with, or whether there is a Being behind them, controlling them for purposes far beyond them, of justice and love; whether, in short, we will be materialists or believers in God. It’s the same old, ever-relevant debate. The factors have only shifted slightly as we’ve gained more knowledge. Where Isaiah felt the Assyrians, we face the evolution of nature and history, and the material forces that sometimes ominously seem like they can be dissected. Everything that has forcefully and gloriously come to the forefront of things, every trend that appears to dominate history, all that demands our awe and offers its straightforward and strong resolution to our lives—is our Assyria. Right now, like then, it is a surge of new powers on the horizon of our knowledge that makes the God who was enough for yesterday’s narrower understanding seem small and outdated today. This problem is inescapable for any generation whose worldview has broadened beyond that of its predecessors. But Isaiah’s greatness lay in this: he was the first to tackle the problem when it emerged with serious force, and he applied the only solid solution—a higher and more spiritual view of God than the one that had proven inadequate. We can thus summarize his argument: "Give me a God who is more than a national protector, give me a God who cares only for righteousness, and I claim that every material force the world shows is just subordinate to Him. Brute force can only be an instrument, an axe, a saw, something fundamentally mechanical and reliant on a hand to wield it. Assume a supreme and righteous Ruler of the world, and you not only find all its movements explained, but can also be assured that it will only be allowed to carry out justice and purify humanity. The world cannot hinder their salvation if God has willed it."
Isaiah's problem was thus the fundamental one between faith and atheism; but we must notice that it did not arise theoretically, nor did he meet it by an abstract proposition. This fundamental religious question—whether men are to trust in the visible forces of the world or in the invisible God—came up as a bit of practical politics. It was not to Isaiah a philosophical or theological question. It was an affair in the foreign policy of Judah.
Isaiah's issue was essentially the basic conflict between faith and disbelief; however, it's important to note that it didn’t come up in a theoretical way, nor did he address it with an abstract idea. This core religious question—whether people should rely on the visible powers of the world or on the unseen God—emerged as a matter of practical politics. For Isaiah, it wasn't a philosophical or theological issue. It was a concern related to Judah's foreign policy.
Except to a few thinkers, the question between materialism and faith never does present itself as one of abstract argument. To the mass of men it is always a question of practical life. Statesmen meet it in their policies, private persons in the conduct of their fortunes. Few of us trouble our heads about an intellectual atheism, but the temptations to practical atheism abound unto us all day by day. Materialism never presents itself as a mere ism; it always takes some concrete form. Our Assyria may be the world in Christ's sense, that flood of successful, heartless, unscrupulous, scornful forces which burst on our innocence, with their challenge to make terms and pay tribute, or go down straightway in the struggle for existence. Beside their frank and forceful demands, how commonplace and irrelevant do the simple precepts of religion often seem; and how the great brazen laugh of the world seems to bleach the beauty out of purity and honour! According to our temper, we either cower before its insolence, whining that character and energy of struggle and religious[176] peace are impossible against it; and that is the Atheism of Fear, with which Isaiah charged the men of Jerusalem, when they were paralysed before Assyria. Or we seek to ensure ourselves against disaster by alliance with the world. We make ourselves one with it, its subjects and imitators. We absorb the world's temper, get to believe in nothing but success, regard men only as they can be useful to us, and think so exclusively of ourselves as to lose the faculty of imagining about us any other right or need or pity. And all that is the Atheism of Force, with which Isaiah charged the Assyrian. It is useless to think, that we common men cannot possibly sin after the grand manner of this imperial monster. In our measure we fatally can. In this commercial age private persons very easily rise to a position of influence, which gives almost as vast a stage for egotism to display itself as the Assyrian boasted. But after all the human Ego needs very little room to develop the possibilities of atheism that are in it. An idol is an idol, whether you put it on a small or a large pedestal. A little man with a little work may as easily stand between himself and God, as an emperor with the world at his feet. Forgetfulness that he is a servant, a trader on graciously entrusted capital—and then at the best an unprofitable one—is not less sinful in a small egoist than in a great one; it is only very much more ridiculous, than Isaiah, with his scorn, has made it to appear in the Assyrian.
Except for a few thinkers, the debate between materialism and faith never presents itself as just a theoretical argument. For most people, it’s always about practical life. Politicians face it in their policies, while ordinary individuals confront it in their daily lives. Few of us really care about intellectual atheism, but the temptations of practical atheism surround us every day. Materialism never shows up as just an abstract idea; it always takes a concrete form. Our Assyria might be the world in Christ's sense—the overwhelming force of successful, heartless, unscrupulous, and scornful influences that challenge our innocence, demanding that we make compromises and pay tribute or risk being left behind in the struggle for survival. In contrast to their direct and powerful demands, the straightforward teachings of religion often seem trivial and irrelevant; the loud laughter of the world seems to strip away the beauty of purity and honor! Depending on our temperament, we either shrink back in the face of its arrogance, lamenting that character, the drive to struggle, and religious peace are impossible against it—and that's the Atheism of Fear, which Isaiah criticized in the men of Jerusalem when they were paralyzed by Assyria. Or we try to protect ourselves from disaster by aligning with the world. We become one with it, its subjects and imitators. We adopt its mindset, come to believe in nothing but success, view people only as useful to us, and become so self-absorbed that we can no longer imagine any other needs for rights or compassion. That is the Atheism of Force, which Isaiah accused the Assyrians of. It’s pointless to think that we ordinary people can't possibly sin in the grand manner of that imperial monster. In our own way, we certainly can. In this commercial age, individuals can easily rise to levels of influence that provide nearly as large a stage for egotism to flourish as the Assyrian did. Yet, ultimately, the human ego doesn’t need much space to develop its atheistic tendencies. An idol is still an idol, whether it's placed on a small pedestal or a large one. A small person with a little job can stand between themselves and God just as easily as an emperor with the world at their feet. Forgetting that they are a servant, a steward of graciously entrusted capital—and at best an unprofitable one—is no less sinful for a small egoist than for a great one; it’s just a lot more absurd, as Isaiah mockingly showed with his portrayal of the Assyrian.
Or our Assyria may be the forces of nature, which have swept upon the knowledge of this generation with the novelty and impetus, with which the northern hosts burst across the horizon of Israel. Men to-day, in the course of their education, become acquainted with laws and forces, which dwarf the simpler theologies of their[177] boyhood, pretty much as the primitive beliefs of Israel dwindled before the arrogant face of Assyria. The alternative confronts them either to retain, with a narrowed and fearful heart, their old conceptions of God, or to find their enthusiasm in studying, and their duty in relating themselves to, the forces of nature alone. If this be the only alternative, there can be no doubt but that most men will take the latter course. We ought as little to wonder at men of to-day abandoning certain theologies and forms of religion for a downright naturalism—for the study of powers that appeal so much to the curiosity and reverence of man—as we wonder at the poor Jews of the eighth century before Christ forsaking their provincial conceptions of God as a tribal Deity for homage to this great Assyrian, who handled the nations and their gods as his playthings. But is such the only alternative? Is there no higher and sovereign conception of God, in which even these natural forces may find their explanation and term? Isaiah found such a conception for his problem, and his problem was very similar to ours. Beneath his idea of God, exalted and spiritual, even the imperial Assyrian, in all his arrogance, fell subordinate and serviceable. The prophet's faith never wavered, and in the end was vindicated by history. Shall we not at least attempt his method of solution? We could not do better than by taking his factors. Isaiah got a God more powerful than Assyria, by simply exalting the old God of his nation in righteousness. This Hebrew was saved from the terrible conclusion, that the selfish, cruel force which in his day carried all before it was the highest power in life, simply by believing righteousness to be more exalted still. But have twenty-five centuries made any change upon this power, by which Isaiah interpreted[178] history and overcame the world? Is righteousness less sovereign now than then, or was conscience more imperative when it spoke in Hebrew than when it speaks in English? Among the decrees of nature, at last interpreted for us in all their scope and reiterated upon our imaginations by the ablest men of the age, truth, purity and civic justice as confidently assert their ultimate victory, as when they were threatened merely by the arrogance of a human despot. The discipline of science and the glories of the worship of nature are indeed justly vaunted over the childish and narrow-minded ideas of God, that prevail in much of our average Christianity. But more glorious than anything in earth or heaven is character, and the adoration of a holy and loving will makes more for "victory and law" than the discipline or the enthusiasm of science. Therefore, if our conceptions of God are overwhelmed by what we know of nature, let us seek to enlarge and spiritualize them. Let us insist, as Isaiah did, upon His righteousness, until our God once more appear indubitably supreme.
Or our Assyria might represent the forces of nature that have surged into the knowledge of this generation with the same newness and energy that the northern armies brought when they invaded Israel. Today, as part of their education, people learn about laws and forces that overshadow the simpler beliefs they held as children, much like the early beliefs of Israel faded when faced with the dominant power of Assyria. The choice they face is either to cling to their old ideas about God with a fearful and limited perspective or to find their passion in studying and connecting with nature's forces alone. If these are the only options, it’s clear that most people will choose the latter path. We shouldn't be surprised when modern individuals abandon certain theologies and forms of religion for a straightforward naturalism—devoting themselves to the study of the forces that captivate and inspire human curiosity—just as we wouldn't be surprised by the Jews of the eighth century before Christ leaving their provincial view of God as a tribal deity to pay tribute to the great Assyrian, who treated nations and their gods like toys. But is this truly the only choice? Is there no higher understanding of God in which these natural forces can find their explanation? Isaiah discovered such a perspective for his own challenges, which were quite like ours. Under his vision of God—exalted and spiritual—even the powerful Assyrian, with all his arrogance, appeared as subordinate and manageable. The prophet's faith remained unshaken, ultimately validated by history. Shouldn’t we at least try his method of tackling the issue? We can't go wrong by adopting his approach. Isaiah found a God greater than Assyria by simply elevating the old God of his people in righteousness. This Hebrew was spared from the grim conclusion that the selfish, cruel force dominating his time was the highest power in life, solely by believing that righteousness was even more elevated. But have twenty-five centuries altered this power by which Isaiah understood [178] history and triumphed over the world? Is righteousness any less sovereign now than it was back then, or was conscience more compelling when it spoke in Hebrew than it does when it speaks in English? Among the laws of nature, now finally interpreted for us in all their breadth and repeatedly brought to our minds by some of the greatest thinkers of our time, truth, purity, and civic justice assert their ultimate victory just as confidently as when they were merely faced with the arrogance of a human tyrant. The discipline of science and the wonders of nature worship are indeed rightly praised over the childish and narrow-minded notions of God that still persist in much of our mainstream Christianity. But more glorious than anything on earth or in heaven is character, and the veneration of a holy and loving will contributes more to "victory and law" than the rigor or excitement of science. Therefore, if our ideas of God are overshadowed by what we understand about nature, let us strive to expand and spiritualize them. Let us, as Isaiah did, emphasize His righteousness, until our God stands undeniably supreme once more.
Otherwise we are left with the intolerable paradox, that truth and honesty, patience and the love of man to man, are after all but the playthings and victims of force; that, to adapt the words of Isaiah, the rod really shakes him who lifts it up, and the staff is wielding that which is not wood.
Otherwise, we are left with the unbearable contradiction that truth and honesty, patience, and the love between people are ultimately just the toys and victims of power; that, to rephrase Isaiah, the rod truly affects the one who raises it, and the staff is controlling something that isn't wood.
CHAPTER X.
THE SPIRIT OF GOD IN MAN AND THE ANIMALS.
Isaiah xi., xii. (ABOUT 720 B.C.?)
Isaiah 11, 12 (ABOUT 720 B.C.?)
Beneath the crash of the Assyrian with which the tenth chapter closes, we pass out into the eleventh upon a glorious prospect of Israel's future. The Assyrian when he falls shall fall for ever like the cedars of Lebanon, that send no fresh sprout forth from their broken stumps. But out of the trunk of the Judæan oak, also brought down by these terrible storms, Isaiah sees springing a fair and powerful Branch. Assyria, he would tell us, has no future. Judah has a future, and at first the prophet sees it in a scion of her royal house. The nation shall be almost exterminated, the dynasty of David hewn to a stump; yet there shall spring a shoot from the stock of Jesse, and a branch from his roots shall bear fruit.
Beneath the downfall of the Assyrian, which ends the tenth chapter, we move into the eleventh chapter with an inspiring vision of Israel’s future. The Assyrian, when he falls, will fall forever like the cedars of Lebanon, which don’t sprout new life from their broken stumps. But from the trunk of the Judah oak, also brought down by these fierce storms, Isaiah sees a beautiful and strong Branch emerging. Assyria, he tells us, has no future. Judah has a future, and at first, the prophet sees it in a descendant of her royal line. The nation will be nearly wiped out, the dynasty of David will be cut down to a stump; yet a shoot will spring up from the stock of Jesse, and a branch from his roots will bear fruit.
The picture of this future, which fills the eleventh chapter, is one of the most extensive that Isaiah has drawn. Three great prospects are unfolded in it: a prospect of mind, a prospect of nature and a prospect of history. To begin with, there is (vv. 2-5) the geography of a royal mind in its stretches of character, knowledge and achievement. We have next (vv. 5-9) a vision of the restitution of nature, Paradise regained. And, thirdly (vv. 9-16), there is the[180] geography of Israel's redemption, the coasts and highways along which the hosts of the dispersion sweep up from captivity to a station of supremacy over the world. To this third prospect chapter xii. forms a fitting conclusion, a hymn of praise in the mouth of returning exiles.[32] The human mind, nature and history are the three dimensions of life, and across them all the prophet tells us that the Spirit of the Lord will fill the future with His marvels of righteousness, wisdom and peace. He presents to us three great ideals: the perfect indwelling of our humanity by the Spirit of God; the peace and communion of all nature, covered with the knowledge of God; the traversing of all history by the Divine purposes of redemption.
The vision of this future, which fills the eleventh chapter, is one of the most detailed that Isaiah has depicted. Three major viewpoints emerge: a perspective on the mind, a perspective on nature, and a perspective on history. First, there is (vv. 2-5) the landscape of a royal mind, stretching across character, knowledge, and achievement. Next, we have (vv. 5-9) a vision of the restoration of nature, a Paradise restored. Lastly (vv. 9-16), there is the[180] landscape of Israel's redemption, the routes and pathways along which the exiled people return from captivity to a position of prominence in the world. Chapter twelve provides a fitting conclusion to this third perspective, a song of praise from the returning exiles.[32] The human mind, nature, and history represent the three dimensions of life, and throughout all of them, the prophet tells us that the Spirit of the Lord will fill the future with His wonders of righteousness, wisdom, and peace. He presents us with three grand ideals: the perfect indwelling of our humanity by the Spirit of God; the peace and unity of all nature, infused with the knowledge of God; and the path of all history guided by Divine purposes of redemption.
I. The Messiah and the Spirit of the Lord (xi. 1-5).
I. The Messiah and the Spirit of the Lord (xi. 1-5).
The first form, in which Isaiah sees Israel's longed-for future realised, is that which he so often exalts and makes glistering upon the threshold of the future—the form of a king. It is a peculiarity, which we cannot fail to remark about Isaiah's scattered representations of this brilliant figure, that they have no connecting link. They do not allude to one another, nor employ a common terminology, even the word king dropping out of some of them. The earliest of the series bestows a name on the Messiah, which none of the others repeat, nor does Isaiah say in any of them, This is He of whom I have spoken before. Perhaps the disconnectedness of these oracles is as strong a proof as is necessary of the view we have formed that[181] throughout his ministry our prophet had before him no distinct, identical individual, but rather an ideal of virtue and kinghood, whose features varied according to the conditions of the time. In this chapter Isaiah recalls nothing of Immanuel, or of the Prince-of-the-Four-Names. Nevertheless (besides for the first time deriving the Messiah from the house of David), he carries his description forward to a stage which lies beyond and to some extent implies his two previous portraits. Immanuel was only a Sufferer with His people in the day of their oppression. The Prince-of-the-Four-Names was the Redeemer of his people from their captivity, and stepped to his throne not only after victory, but with the promise of a long and just government shining from the titles by which He was proclaimed. But now Isaiah not only speaks at length of this peaceful reign—a chronological advance—but describes his hero so inwardly that we also feel a certain spiritual advance. The Messiah is no more a mere experience, as Immanuel was, nor only outward deed and promise, like the Prince-of-the-Four-Names, but at last, and very strongly, a character. The second verse is the definition of this character; the third describes the atmosphere in which it lives. And there shall rest upon him the Spirit of Jehovah, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and the fear of Jehovah; and he shall draw breath in the fear of Jehovah—in other words, ripeness but also sharpness of mind; moral decision and heroic energy; piety in its two forms of knowing the will of God and feeling the constraint to perform it. We could not have a more concise summary of the strong elements of a ruling mind. But it is only as Judge and Ruler that Isaiah[182] cares here to think of his hero. Nothing is said of the tender virtues, and we feel that the prophet still stands in the days of the need of inflexible government and purgation in Judah.
The first version, in which Isaiah sees the long-awaited future of Israel realized, is the one he frequently celebrates and portrays brightly as it approaches—the image of a king. It's interesting to note that Isaiah's various depictions of this glorious figure lack any connection. They don’t reference each other or use a consistent terminology; even the word king is absent in some of them. The earliest in the series gives the Messiah a name that none of the others repeat, and Isaiah doesn’t say in any of them, "This is the one I spoke of before." Perhaps the lack of connection in these prophecies strongly supports our view that throughout his ministry, our prophet envisioned not a specific, individual figure but rather an ideal of virtue and kingship, whose characteristics changed depending on the circumstances of the time. In this chapter, Isaiah doesn’t mention Immanuel or the Prince-of-the-Four-Names. However, for the first time deriving the Messiah from the house of David, he extends his description to a level that goes beyond and somewhat incorporates his two previous portraits. Immanuel was simply a Sufferer with His people during their oppression. The Prince-of-the-Four-Names was the Redeemer of his people from captivity and ascended to his throne not only after victory but with the promise of a long and just reign reflected in the titles by which He was announced. Now, Isaiah elaborates on this peaceful rule—a chronological progression—but he also describes his hero so deeply that we also sense a certain spiritual advancement. The Messiah is no longer just an experience, as Immanuel was, or merely an outward action and promise, like the Prince-of-the-Four-Names; he is, at last, very clearly, a character. The second verse defines this character, while the third describes the environment in which it exists. And there shall rest upon him the Spirit of Jehovah, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and the fear of Jehovah; and he shall draw breath in the fear of Jehovah—in other words, maturity but also sharp intellect; moral decisiveness and heroic strength; piety in its two forms of knowing God’s will and feeling compelled to fulfill it. We couldn't ask for a more succinct summary of the key attributes of a governing mind. Yet, Isaiah focuses solely on his hero as Judge and Ruler here. There’s no mention of gentler virtues, and it’s clear that the prophet remains in times that demand unyielding governance and purification in Judah.
Dean Plumptre has plausibly suggested, that these verses may represent the programme which Isaiah set before his pupil Hezekiah on his accession to the charge of a nation, whom his weak predecessor had suffered to lapse into such abuse of justice and laxity of morals.[33] The acts of government described are all of a punitive and repressive character. The hero speaks only to make the land tremble: And He shall smite the land[34] with the rod of His mouth [what need, after the whispering, indecisive Ahaz!], and with the breath of His lips shall He slay the wicked.
Dean Plumptre has reasonably suggested that these verses could represent the plan Isaiah laid out for his student Hezekiah when he took over leadership of a nation that his weak predecessor allowed to fall into severe injustice and moral decay.[33] The actions of the government described are all punitive and repressive. The hero speaks only to instill fear in the land: And He shall strike the land[34] with the rod of His mouth [what a contrast to the indecisive whisperer Ahaz!], and with the breath of His lips shall He kill the wicked.
This, though a fuller and more ethical picture of the Messiah than even the ninth chapter, is evidently wanting in many of the traits of a perfect man. Isaiah has to grow in his conception of his Hero, and will grow as the years go on, in tenderness. His thirty-second chapter is a much richer, a more gracious and humane picture of the Messiah. There the Victor of the ninth and righteous Judge of the eleventh chapters is represented as a Man, who shall not only punish but protect, and not only reign but inspire, who shall be life as well as victory and justice to His people—an hiding-place from the wind and a[183] covert from the tempest, as rivers of water in a dry place, as the shadow of a great rock in a weary land.
This, while a more complete and ethical depiction of the Messiah than even the ninth chapter, clearly lacks many characteristics of a perfect man. Isaiah has to evolve in his understanding of his Hero and will grow in compassion as time goes on. His thirty-second chapter offers a much richer, more gracious, and humane image of the Messiah. There, the Victor from the ninth and the righteous Judge from the eleventh chapters is portrayed as a Man, who will not only punish but also protect, and not just reign but inspire, who will bring life along with victory and justice to His people—a hiding place from the wind and a[183]covert from the tempest, as rivers of water in a dry place, as the shadow of a great rock in a weary land.
A conception so limited to the qualifications of an earthly monarch, as this of chap. xi., gives us no ground for departing from our previous conclusion, that Isaiah had not a "supernatural" personality in his view. The Christian Church, however, has not confined the application of the passage to earthly kings and magistrates, but has seen its perfect fulfilment in the indwelling of Christ's human nature by the Holy Ghost. But it is remarkable, that for this exegesis she has not made use of the most "supernatural" of the details of character here portrayed. If the Old Testament has a phrase for sinlessness, that phrase occurs here, in the beginning of the third verse. In the authorized English version it is translated, and shall make him of quick understanding in the fear of the Lord, and in the Revised Version, His delight shall be in the fear of the Lord, and on the margin the literal meaning of delight is given as scent. But the phrase may as well mean, He shall draw his breath in the fear of the Lord; and it is a great pity, that our revisers have not even on the margin given to English readers any suggestion of so picturesque, and probably so correct, a rendering. It is a most expressive definition of sinlessness—sinlessness which was the attribute of Christ alone. We, however purely intentioned we be, are compassed about by an atmosphere of sin. We cannot help breathing what now inflames our passions, now chills our warmest feelings, and makes our throats incapable of honest testimony or glorious praise. As oxygen to a dying fire, so the worldliness we breathe is to the sin within us. We cannot help it; it is the atmosphere into which we are born. But from this Christ alone of men was free. He was His own atmosphere,[184] drawing breath in the fear of the Lord. Of Him alone is it recorded, that, though living in the world, He was never infected with the world's sin. The blast of no man's cruelty ever kindled unholy wrath within His breast; nor did men's unbelief carry to His soul its deadly chill. Not even when He was led of the devil into the atmosphere of temptation, did His heart throb with one rebellious ambition. Christ drew breath in the fear of the Lord.
A view as limited to the characteristics of a worldly king, like the one in chapter xi, gives us no reason to change our previous conclusion that Isaiah didn’t envision a “supernatural” figure. However, the Christian Church hasn’t restricted the interpretation of this passage to earthly rulers but has recognized its ultimate fulfillment in Christ's human nature filled with the Holy Spirit. Yet, it’s noteworthy that in this interpretation, the Church hasn’t highlighted the most “supernatural” traits depicted here. If the Old Testament has a term for being without sin, it appears in the beginning of the third verse. In the King James Version, it’s translated as, and shall make him of quick understanding in the fear of the Lord, and in the Revised Version, His delight shall be in the fear of the Lord; with the margin providing the literal meaning of delight as scent. But the phrase could just as well mean, He shall draw his breath in the fear of the Lord; and it’s unfortunate that our revisers didn’t even suggest such a vivid, likely accurate rendering in the margin for English readers. It’s a very expressive definition of sinlessness—a quality that belonged solely to Christ. No matter how pure our intentions are, we are surrounded by an environment of sin. We can’t help but breathe in what sometimes ignites our passions, sometimes numbs our deepest emotions, making it hard for us to speak truthfully or offer genuine praise. Just as oxygen sustains a dying fire, the worldliness we inhale fuels the sin within us. We can’t escape it; it’s the atmosphere we are born into. But Christ alone was free from this. He was His own environment,[184] drawing breath in the fear of the Lord. Of Him alone is it said that, while living in the world, He was never tainted by its sin. No one’s cruelty ever ignited unholy anger in Him; nor did another's disbelief freeze His soul with its deadly chill. Even when led by the devil into the realm of temptation, His heart did not throb with a single rebellious ambition. Christ drew breath in the fear of the Lord.
But draughts of this atmosphere are possible to us also, to whom the Holy Spirit is granted. We too, who sicken with the tainted breath of society, and see the characters of children about us fall away and the hidden evil within leap to swift flame before the blasts of the world—we too may, by Christ's grace, draw breath, like Him, in the fear of the Lord. Recall some day when, leaving your close room and the smoky city, you breasted the hills of God, and into opened lungs drew deep draughts of the fresh air of heaven. What strength it gave your body, and with what a glow of happiness your mind was filled! What that is physically, Christ has made possible for us men morally. He has revealed stretches and eminences of life, where, following in His footsteps, we also shall draw for our breath the fear of God. This air is inspired up every steep hill of effort, and upon all summits of worship. In the most passion-haunted air, prayer will immediately bring this atmosphere about a man, and on the wings of praise the poorest soul may rise from the miasma of temptation, and sing forth her song into the azure with as clear a throat as the lark's.
But we can also experience this kind of atmosphere, since the Holy Spirit is given to us. We too, who are troubled by the toxic air of society, and see the innocence of children around us fade while the hidden evil within us ignites rapidly in the face of the world's challenges—we too can, by Christ's grace, take a breath, like Him, in the fear of the Lord. Think back to a day when, stepping out of your cramped room and the smoky city, you climbed the hills of God and filled your lungs with the fresh air of heaven. What strength it brought to your body, and how joyfully your mind was uplifted! Just as that experience is physical, Christ has made something similar possible for us morally. He has shown us the heights and expanses of life where, by following in His footsteps, we too can breathe in the fear of God. This air is found on every steep hill of effort and at all peaks of worship. In the most troubled air, prayer will quickly create this atmosphere around a person, and on the wings of praise, even the most struggling soul can rise above the swamp of temptation and sing her song into the blue sky with as clear a voice as the lark's.
And what else is heaven to be, if not this? God, we are told, shall be its Sun; but its atmosphere shall be[185] His fear, which is clean and endureth for ever. Heaven seems most real as a moral open-air, where every breath is an inspiration, and every pulse a healthy joy, where no thoughts from within us find breath but those of obedience and praise, and all our passions and aspirations are of the will of God. He that lives near to Christ, and by Christ often seeks God in prayer, may create for himself even on earth such a heaven, perfecting holiness in the fear of God.
And what else can heaven be, if not this? We’re told that God will be its Sun, but its atmosphere will be[185] His fear, which is pure and lasts forever. Heaven feels most real as a moral open space, where every breath is uplifting, and every heartbeat brings joy, where the only thoughts we have are those of obedience and praise, and all our desires and hopes align with the will of God. Those who stay close to Christ and seek God through prayer can create even on earth such a heaven, perfecting holiness in the fear of God.
II. The Seven Spirits of God (xi. 2, 3).
II. The Seven Spirits of God (xi. 2, 3).
This passage, which suggests so much of Christ, is also for Christian Theology and Art a classical passage on the Third Person of the Trinity. If the texts in the book of Revelation (chaps. i. 4; iii. 1; iv. 5; v. 6) upon the Seven Spirits of God were not themselves founded on this text of Isaiah, it is certain that the Church immediately began to interpret them by its details. While there are only six spirits of God named here—three pairs—yet, in order to complete the perfect number, the exegesis of early Christianity sometimes added the Spirit of the Lord at the beginning of verse 2 as the central branch of a seven-branched candlestick; or sometimes the quick understanding in the fear of the Lord in the beginning of verse 3 was attached as the seventh branch. (Compare Zech. iv. 6.)
This passage, which reflects much about Christ, is also a key reference for Christian Theology and Art regarding the Third Person of the Trinity. If the texts in the book of Revelation (chaps. i. 4; iii. 1; iv. 5; v. 6) about the Seven Spirits of God weren't based on this Isaiah text, it's clear that the Church quickly began to interpret them by its details. While only six spirits of God are named here—three pairs—early Christian exegesis sometimes included the Spirit of the Lord at the start of verse 2 to complete the perfect number, representing the central branch of a seven-branched candlestick; or sometimes the quick understanding in the fear of the Lord at the beginning of verse 3 was added as the seventh branch. (Compare Zech. iv. 6.)
It is remarkable that there is almost no single text of Scripture, which has more impressed itself upon Christian doctrine and symbol than this second verse of the eleventh chapter, interpreted as a definition of the Seven Spirits of God. In the theology, art and worship of the Middle Ages it dominated the expression of the work of the Holy Ghost. First, and most native to its origin, arose the employment of this text at the[186] coronation of kings and the fencing of tribunals of justice. What Isaiah wrote for Hezekiah of Judah became the official prayer, song or ensample of the earliest Christian kings in Europe. It is evidently the model of that royal hymn—not by Charlemagne, as usually supposed, but by his grandson Charles the Bald—the Veni Creator Spiritus. In a Greek miniature of the tenth century, the Holy Spirit, as a dove, is seen hovering over King David, who displays the prayer: Give the king Thy judgements, O God, and Thy righteousness to the king's son, while there stand on either side of him the figures of Wisdom and Prophecy.[35] Henry III.'s order of knighthood, "Du Saint Esprit," was restricted to political men, and particularly to magistrates. But perhaps the most interesting identification of the Holy Spirit with the rigorous virtues of our passage occurs in a story of St. Dunstan, who, just before mass on the day of Pentecost, discovered that three coiners, who had been sentenced to death, were being respited till the Festival of the Holy Ghost should be over. "It shall not be thus," cried the indignant saint, and gave orders for their immediate execution. There was remonstrance, but he, no doubt with the eleventh of Isaiah in mind, insisted, and was obeyed. "I now hope," he said, resuming the mass, "that God will be pleased to accept the sacrifice I am about to offer." "Whereupon," says the veracious Acts of the Saints, "a snow-white dove did, in the vision of many, descend from heaven, and until the sacrifice was completed remain above his head in silence, with wings extended and motionless." Which may be as much legend as we have the heart to make it, but nevertheless[187] remains a sure proof of the association, by discerning mediævals who could read their Scriptures, of the Holy Spirit with the decisiveness and rigorous justice of Isaiah's "mirror for magistrates."[36]
It’s impressive that there’s hardly any other text in Scripture that has influenced Christian beliefs and symbols as much as this second verse of the eleventh chapter, interpreted as a definition of the Seven Spirits of God. In the theology, art, and worship of the Middle Ages, it shaped the expression of the Holy Ghost's work. The use of this text first occurred during the coronation of kings and the establishment of courts of justice. What Isaiah wrote for Hezekiah of Judah became the official prayer, song, or example for the earliest Christian kings in Europe. It’s clearly the model for that royal hymn—not by Charlemagne, as often thought, but by his grandson Charles the Bald—the Veni Creator Spiritus. In a Greek miniature from the tenth century, the Holy Spirit is depicted as a dove hovering over King David, who displays the prayer: Give the king Thy judgements, O God, and Thy righteousness to the king's son, while figures of Wisdom and Prophecy stand on either side of him.[35] Henry III.'s order of knighthood, "Du Saint Esprit," was limited to political figures, especially magistrates. But perhaps the most intriguing connection of the Holy Spirit with the strict virtues in our passage is found in a story about St. Dunstan. Just before mass on Pentecost, he learned that three coiners sentenced to death were being spared until after the Festival of the Holy Ghost. "This shall not be," exclaimed the furious saint, and ordered their immediate execution. There was protest, but he, undoubtedly thinking of Isaiah’s eleventh chapter, insisted and was obeyed. "I hope," he said as he resumed the mass, "that God will accept the sacrifice I’m about to offer." "Then," the reliable Acts of the Saints reports, "a snow-white dove appeared, in the vision of many, descending from heaven and remaining above his head in silence, with wings extended and unmoving, until the sacrifice was completed." Whether this story is more legend than truth, it still clearly shows the connection, in the eyes of discerning medieval readers, of the Holy Spirit with the decisiveness and strict justice encapsulated in Isaiah's "mirror for magistrates."[36]
But the influence of our passage may be followed to that wider definition of the Spirit's work, which made Him the Fountain of all intelligence. The Spirits of the Lord mentioned by Isaiah are prevailingly intellectual; and the mediæval Church, using the details of this passage to interpret Christ's own intimation of the Paraclete as the Spirit of truth,—remembering also the story of Pentecost, when the Spirit bestowed the gifts of tongues, and the case of Stephen, who, in the triumph of his eloquence and learning, was said to be full of the Holy Ghost,—did regard, as Gregory of Tours expressly declared, the Holy Spirit as the "God of the intellect more than of the heart." All Councils were opened by a mass to the Holy Ghost, and few, who have examined with care the windows of mediæval churches, will have failed to be struck with the frequency with which the Dove is seen descending upon the heads of miraculously learned persons, or presiding at discussions, or hovering over groups of figures representing the sciences.[37] To the mediæval Church, then, the Holy Spirit was the Author of the intellect, more especially of the governing and political intellect; and there can be little doubt, after a study of the variations of this doctrine, that the first five verses of the eleventh of Isaiah formed upon it the classical text of appeal. To Christians, who have been accustomed by the use of the word Comforter to associate the Spirit only with[188] the gentle and consoling influences of heaven, it may seem strange to find His energy identified with the stern rigour of the magistrate. But in its practical, intelligent and reasonable uses the mediæval doctrine is greatly to be preferred, on grounds both of Scripture and common-sense, to those two comparatively modern corruptions of it, one of which emphasizes the Spirit's influence in the exclusive operation of the grace of orders, and the other, driving to an opposite extreme, dissipates it into the vaguest religiosity. It is one of the curiosities of Christian theology, that a Divine influence, asserted by Scripture and believed by the early Church to manifest itself in the successful conduct of civil offices and the fulness of intellectual learning, should in these latter days be so often set up in a sort of "supernatural" opposition to practical wisdom and the results of science. But we may go back to Isaiah for the same kind of correction on this doctrine, as he has given us on the doctrine of faith; and while we do not forget the richer meaning the New Testament bestows on the operation of the Divine Spirit, we may learn from the Hebrew prophet to seek the inspiration of the Holy Ghost in all the endeavours of science, and not to forget that it is His guidance alone which enables us to succeed in the conduct of our offices and fortunes.
But the influence of our passage can be traced to a broader understanding of the Spirit's work, which identified Him as the source of all intelligence. The Spirits of the Lord mentioned by Isaiah are primarily intellectual; and the medieval Church, using the details of this passage to interpret Christ's own reference to the Paraclete as the Spirit of truth—also recalling the story of Pentecost, when the Spirit granted the gifts of tongues, and the instance of Stephen, who, in his triumphant eloquence and wisdom, was noted to be filled with the Holy Ghost—did regard, as Gregory of Tours explicitly stated, the Holy Spirit as the "God of the intellect more than of the heart." All Councils began with a mass dedicated to the Holy Ghost, and few who have closely examined the stained glass of medieval churches will have missed how often the Dove is depicted descending upon the heads of miraculously enlightened individuals, presiding at discussions, or hovering over groups representing various sciences.[37] To the medieval Church, then, the Holy Spirit was seen as the Creator of intellect, particularly the governing and political intellect; and there is little doubt, after studying the variations of this doctrine, that the first five verses of the eleventh chapter of Isaiah became the classical text of reference for it. To Christians, who have been accustomed to associate the Spirit only with the gentle and comforting influences of heaven through the word Comforter, it may seem odd to find His energy connected to the stern authority of the magistrate. However, in its practical, intelligent, and reasonable applications, the medieval doctrine is far preferable, based on both Scripture and common sense, to those two relatively modern distortions of it: one emphasizes the Spirit's influence in the exclusive functioning of the grace of orders, while the other, pushing to the opposite extreme, disperses it into vague religiosity. It is one of the intriguing aspects of Christian theology that a Divine influence, asserted by Scripture and believed by the early Church to manifest in the effective management of civil duties and the richness of intellectual knowledge, should in these later times often be seen in a kind of "supernatural" conflict with practical wisdom and scientific outcomes. But we can return to Isaiah for similar correction on this doctrine, just as he has provided on the doctrine of faith; and while we do not overlook the deeper meaning the New Testament gives to the operation of the Divine Spirit, we can learn from the Hebrew prophet to seek the inspiration of the Holy Ghost in all scientific endeavors, and to remember that it is His guidance alone that enables us to succeed in managing our duties and fortunes.
III. The Redemption of Nature (xi. 6-9).
III. The Redemption of Nature (xi. 6-9).
But Isaiah will not be satisfied with the establishment of a strong government in the land and the redemption of human society from chaos. He prophesies the redemption of all nature as well. It is one of those errors, which distort both the poetry and truth of the Bible, to suppose that by the bears, lions and[189] reptiles which the prophet now sees tamed in the time of the regeneration, he intends the violent human characters which he so often attacks. When Isaiah here talks of the beasts, he means the beasts. The passage is not allegorical, but direct, and forms a parallel to the well-known passage in the eighth of Romans. Isaiah and Paul, chief apostles of the two covenants, both interrupt their magnificent odes upon the outpouring of the Spirit, to remind us that the benefits of this will be shared by the brute and unintelligent creation. And, perhaps, there is no finer contrast in the Scriptures than here, where beside so majestic a description of the intellectual faculties of humanity Isaiah places so charming a picture of the docility and sportfulness of wild animals,—And a little child shall lead them.
But Isaiah won't be satisfied with just establishing a strong government in the land and freeing human society from chaos. He also prophesies the redemption of all of nature. It’s one of those misconceptions that warp both the poetry and truth of the Bible to think that when the bears, lions, and [189] reptiles are seen tamed during this time of renewal, he’s referring to the violent human behaviors he often criticizes. When Isaiah talks about the beasts here, he refers to actual animals. This passage isn’t allegorical; it’s straightforward and parallels the well-known passage in Romans chapter eight. Both Isaiah and Paul, key figures of the two covenants, pause in their grand expressions about the outpouring of the Spirit to remind us that the benefits of this will also extend to animals and the rest of creation. Perhaps there’s no greater contrast in the Scriptures than this, where, alongside such a majestic depiction of human intellectual abilities, Isaiah presents such a delightful image of the gentleness and playfulness of wild animals—And a little child shall lead them.
We, who live in countries, from which wild beasts have been exterminated, cannot understand the insecurity and terror, that they cause in regions where they abound. A modern seer of the times of regeneration would leave the wild animals out of his vision. They do not impress any more the human conscience or imagination. But they once did so most terribly. The hostility between man and the beasts not only formed once upon a time the chief material obstacle in the progress of the race, but remains still to the religious thinker the most pathetic portion of that groaning and travailing of all creation, which is so heavy a burden on his heart. Isaiah, from his ancient point of view, is in thorough accord with the order of civilisation, when he represents the subjugation of wild animals as the first problem of man, after he has established a strong government in the land. So far from rhetorizing or allegorizing—above which literary forms it[190] would appear to be impossible for the appreciation of some of his commentators to follow him—Isaiah is earnestly celebrating a very real moment in the laborious progress of mankind. Isaiah stands where Hercules stood, and Theseus, and Arthur when
We, who live in countries where wild animals have been wiped out, can't understand the fear and insecurity they create in places where they thrive. A modern visionary of our times would likely overlook wild animals in his outlook. They no longer capture the human conscience or imagination. But they once did, and in a terrifying way. The conflict between humans and beasts not only once posed a significant obstacle to human progress, but it still remains, for the religious thinker, the most heartbreaking aspect of the suffering and struggles of all creation, which weighs heavily on his heart. Isaiah, from his ancient perspective, aligns perfectly with the progression of civilization when he sees the control of wild animals as humanity's first challenge after establishing a strong government in the land. Far from indulging in rhetoric or allegory—forms of literature that some of his commentators seem unable to grasp—Isaiah is truly celebrating a very real milestone in the challenging journey of humankind. Isaiah stands where Hercules, Theseus, and Arthur once did when
Where the beast was increasingly present,
But mankind was decreasing more and more until Arthur arrived.
And he drove
The pagan, and he killed the beast, and brought it down.
The forest allowed sunlight in and created
Wide paths for the hunter and the knight,
And so they returned.
But Isaiah would solve the grim problem of the warfare between man and his lower fellow-creatures in a very different way from that, of which these heroes have set the example to humanity. Isaiah would not have the wild beasts exterminated, but tamed. There our Western and modern imagination may fail to follow him, especially when he includes reptiles in the regeneration, and prophesies of adders and lizards as the playthings of children. But surely there is no genial man, who has watched the varied forms of life that sport in the Southern sunshine, who will not sympathize with the prophet in his joyous vision. Upon a warm spring day in Palestine, to sit upon the grass, beside some old dyke or ruin with its face to the south, is indeed to obtain a rapturous view of the wealth of life, with which the bountiful God has blessed and made merry man's dwelling-place. How the lizards come and go among the grey stones, and flash like jewels in the dust! And the timid snake rippling quickly past through the grass, and the leisurely tortoise, with his shiny back, and the chameleon, shivering into new colour as he passes from twig to stone and stone to straw,—all the air the while[191] alive with the music of the cricket and the bee! You feel that the ideal is not to destroy these pretty things as vermin. What a loss of colour the lizards alone would imply! But, as Isaiah declares,—whom we may imagine walking with his children up the steep vineyard paths, to watch the creatures come and go upon the dry dykes on either hand,—the ideal is to bring them into sympathy with ourselves, make pets of them and playthings for children, who indeed stretch out their hands in joy to the pretty toys. Why should we need to fight with, or destroy, any of the happy life the Lord has created? Why have we this loathing to it, and need to defend ourselves from it, when there is so much suffering we could cure, and so much childlikeness we could amuse and be amused by, and yet it will not let us near? To these questions there is not another answer but the answer of the Bible: that this curse of conflict and distrust between man and his fellow-creatures is due to man's sin, and shall only be done away by man's redemption.
But Isaiah would tackle the serious issue of the conflict between humanity and lesser creatures in a very different way than the examples set by these heroes. Isaiah wouldn’t want the wild animals wiped out, but rather tamed. Our modern imagination might struggle to keep up, especially when he includes reptiles in this renewal and envisions adders and lizards as children’s playthings. Yet, surely, anyone who has observed the diverse life forms enjoying the Southern sunshine can relate to the prophet in his joyful vision. On a warm spring day in Palestine, sitting on the grass next to an old dyke or ruin facing south offers a truly enchanting view of the rich life with which a generous God has blessed man's dwelling. How the lizards dash around among the grey stones, sparkling like jewels in the dust! And the shy snake glides swiftly through the grass, the leisurely tortoise with its shiny shell, and the chameleon changing colors as it moves from twig to stone to straw—while the air is filled with the sounds of crickets and bees! One realizes that the ideal isn’t to eradicate these lovely creatures as pests. Imagine the loss of color if the lizards were gone! As Isaiah suggests—we can picture him walking with his children up the steep vineyard paths, watching the creatures come and go along the dry dykes on either side—the goal is to foster harmony with them, to make them pets and toys for children, who eagerly reach out to touch these delightful beings. Why should we have to fight against or eliminate any of the joyful life that the Lord has created? Why do we feel repulsed by it and feel the need to protect ourselves from it, when there’s so much pain we could alleviate, and so much innocence we could enjoy, yet it seems to keep us at a distance? The only answer to these questions is the one given in the Bible: this curse of conflict and distrust between humans and their fellow creatures arises from humanity’s sin, and it can only be resolved through redemption.
Nor is this Bible answer,—of which the book of Genesis gives us the one end, and this text of Isaiah the other,—a mere pious opinion, which the true history of man's dealing with wild beasts by extermination proves to be impracticable. We may take on scientific authority a few facts as hints from nature, that after all man is to blame for the wildness of the beasts, and that through his sanctification they may be restored to sympathy with himself. Charles Darwin says: "It deserves notice, that at an extremely ancient period, when man first entered any country the animals living there would have felt no instinctive or inherited fear of him, and would consequently have been tamed far more easily than at present." And he gives some very instructive facts in proof of this with regard to dogs, antelopes,[192] manatees and hawks. "Quadrupeds and birds which have seldom been disturbed by man dread him no more than do our English birds the cows or horses grazing in the fields."[38] Darwin's details are peculiarly pathetic in their revelation of the brutes' utter trustfulness in man, before they get to know him. Persons, who have had to do with individual animals of a species that has never been thoroughly tamed, are aware that the difficulty of training them lies in convincing them of our sincerity and good-heartedness, and that when this is got over they will learn almost any trick or habit. The well-known lines of Burns to the field-mouse gather up the cause of all this in a fashion very similar to the Bible's.
Nor is this Bible answer—which the book of Genesis gives us one side of, and this text from Isaiah provides the other—just a pious opinion, which the true history of humanity's interactions with wild animals by extermination shows to be impractical. We can take a few facts from science as clues from nature that, after all, humans are responsible for the wildness of animals, and that through our betterment, they might be restored to a sense of companionship with us. Charles Darwin states: "It's worth noting that in a very ancient time, when humans first arrived in any area, the animals living there would not have had any instinctive or inherited fear of them, and would therefore have been much easier to tame than they are today." He provides some insightful examples regarding dogs, antelopes,[192] manatees, and hawks. "Quadrupeds and birds that have rarely been disturbed by humans fear us no more than our English birds fear the cows or horses grazing in the fields."[38] Darwin’s details are especially poignant in showing the animals' complete trust in humans before they get to know us. People who have worked with individual animals from species that have never been fully domesticated know that the challenge in training them lies in proving our sincerity and kindness, and once that's established, they'll learn nearly any trick or behavior. The famous lines from Burns about the field mouse encapsulate this idea in a way very similar to that of the Bible.
Has disrupted nature's social bond,
And proves that bad opinion,
Which makes you startle
To me, your poor companion born of the earth
And fellow human.
How much the appeal of suffering animals to man—the look of a wounded horse or dog with a meaning which speech would only spoil, the tales of beasts of prey that in pain have turned to man as their physician, the approach of the wildest birds in winter to our feet as their Providence—how much all these prove Paul's saying that the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God. And we have other signals, than those afforded by the pain and pressure of the beasts themselves, of the time when they and man shall sympathize. The natural history of many of our breeds of domesticated animals teaches[193] us the lesson that their growth in skill and character—no one who has enjoyed the friendship of several dogs will dispute the possibility of character in the lower animals—has been proportionate to man's own. Though savages are fond of keeping and taming animals, they fail to advance them to the stages of cunning and discipline, which animals reach under the influence of civilised man.[39] "No instance is on record," says Darwin, "of such dogs as bloodhounds, spaniels or true greyhounds having been kept by savages; they are the products of long-continued civilisation."
How much the suffering of animals affects us—like the look of a wounded horse or dog that words would only ruin, the stories of wild animals that, in pain, have turned to humans for help, and the way even the most untamed birds approach us in winter as if we are their providers—how much all of this supports Paul's saying that the earnest expectation of the creature waits for the manifestation of the sons of God. We have other signs, beyond the pain and struggles of the animals themselves, indicating when they and humans will truly connect. The natural history of many of our domesticated breeds shows us that their growth in skill and character—no one who has had close relationships with different dogs will deny that animals can have character—has kept pace with our own development. While primitive people do enjoy keeping and taming animals, they don't elevate them to the levels of intelligence and training that domesticated animals achieve under the care of civilized humans. "There's no record," Darwin states, "of dogs like bloodhounds, spaniels, or true greyhounds being kept by primitive people; they are the result of long-term civilization."
These facts, if few, certainly bear in the direction of Isaiah's prophecy, that not by extermination of the beasts, but by the influence upon them of man's greater force of character, may that warfare be brought to an end, of which man's sin, according to the Bible, is the original cause.
These facts, though limited, definitely support Isaiah's prophecy that the way to end the conflict caused by human sin, as stated in the Bible, is not through the destruction of animals, but rather by the influence of humanity's stronger character on them.
The practical "uses" of such a passage of Scripture as this are plain. Some of them are the awful responsibility of man's position as the keystone of creation, the material effects of sin, and especially the religiousness of our relation to the lower animals. More than once do the Hebrew prophets liken the Almighty's dealings with man to merciful man's dealings with his beasts.[40] Both Isaiah and Paul virtually declare that man discharges to the lower creatures a mediatorial office. To say so will of course seem an exaggeration to some people, but not to those who, besides being grateful to remember what help in labour and cheer in dreariness we owe our humble fellow-creatures, have been fortunate enough to enjoy the affection and trust of a dumb friend. Men[194] who abuse the lower animals sin very grievously against God; men who neglect them lose some of the religious possibilities of life. If it is our business in life to have the charge of animals, we should magnify our calling. Every coachman and carter ought to feel something of the priest about him; he should think no amount of skill and patience too heavy if it enables him to gain insight into the nature of creatures of God, all of whose hope, by Scripture and his own experience, is towards himself.
The practical "uses" of this passage of Scripture are clear. Some of them include the heavy responsibility of humans as the cornerstone of creation, the real consequences of sin, and especially our spiritual connection to animals. More than once, the Hebrew prophets compare God's interactions with humans to the compassionate way that humans interact with their animals.[40] Both Isaiah and Paul essentially claim that humans take on a mediatorial role for the lower creatures. Some may think this is an exaggeration, but it won't be to those who, in addition to appreciating the help and comfort we receive from our humble companions, have been lucky enough to experience the love and trust of a silent friend. People who mistreat animals sin seriously against God; those who ignore them miss out on some spiritual opportunities in life. If it's our duty to care for animals, we should elevate our role. Every coachman and cart driver should feel a sense of the priesthood within them; they should consider no level of skill and patience too much if it allows them to understand the nature of God's creatures, all of whom, according to Scripture and personal experience, look to us for hope.
Our relation to the lower animals is one of the three great relations of our nature. For God our worship; for man our service; for the beasts our providence, and according both to Isaiah and Paul, the mediation of our holiness.
Our relationship with lower animals is one of the three important aspects of our nature. We worship God; we serve other people; and we provide for animals, and according to both Isaiah and Paul, we also contribute to our own holiness through this care.
IV. The Return and Sovereignty of Israel (xi. 10-16).
IV. The Return and Sovereignty of Israel (xi. 10-16).
In passing from the second to the third part of this prophecy, we cannot but feel that we descend to a lower point of view and a less pure atmosphere of spiritual ambition. Isaiah, who has just declared peace between man and beast, finds that Judah must clear off certain scores against her neighbours before there can be peace between man and man. It is an interesting psychological study. The prophet, who has been able to shake off man's primeval distrust and loathing of wild animals, cannot divest himself of the political tempers of his age. He admits, indeed, the reconciliation of Ephraim and Judah; but the first act of the reconciled brethren, he prophesies with exultation, will be to swoop down upon their cousins Edom, Moab and Ammon, and their neighbours the Philistines.[195] We need not longer dwell on this remarkable limitation of the prophet's spirit, except to point out that while Isaiah clearly saw that Israel's own purity would not be perfected except by her political debasement, he could not as yet perceive any way for the conversion of the rest of the world except through Israel's political supremacy.
As we move from the second to the third part of this prophecy, it’s hard not to feel that we’re stepping down to a lower perspective and a less noble atmosphere of spiritual ambition. Isaiah, who has just proclaimed peace between humans and animals, realizes that Judah must settle some scores with her neighbors before there can be peace among people. It's an interesting psychological observation. The prophet, who has managed to overcome humanity's ancient distrust and dislike of wild animals, can't shake off the political attitudes of his time. He does acknowledge the reconciliation of Ephraim and Judah; however, he prophesies with excitement that the first thing the reconciled brothers will do is to swoop down upon their cousins Edom, Moab, and Ammon, along with their neighbors the Philistines.[195] We need not dwell further on this notable limitation of the prophet's spirit, except to note that while Isaiah clearly recognized that Israel’s own purity could only be completed through its political downfall, he had yet to see any path for converting the rest of the world except through Israel’s political dominance.
The prophet, however, is more occupied with an event preliminary to Israel's sovereignty, namely the return from exile. His large and emphatic assertions remind the not yet captive Judah through how much captivity she has to pass before she can see the margin of the blessed future which he has been describing to her. Isaiah's words imply a much more general captivity than had taken place by the time he spoke them, and we see that he is still keeping steadily in view that thorough reduction of his people, to the prospect of which he was forced in his inaugural vision. Judah has to be dispersed, even as Ephraim has been, before the glories of this chapter shall be realized.
The prophet is, however, more focused on an event leading up to Israel's sovereignty, specifically the return from exile. His strong and significant statements remind the not-yet-captive Judah of how much captivity she will have to endure before she can glimpse the bright future he has been describing to her. Isaiah's words suggest a much more extensive captivity than what had occurred by the time he spoke them, and it’s clear he is still keeping in mind the complete downfall of his people, which he foresaw in his initial vision. Judah must be scattered, just like Ephraim has been, before the glories of this chapter can be realized.
We postpone further treatment of this prophecy, along with the hymn (chap. xii.), which is attached to it, to a separate chapter, dealing with all the representations, which the first half of the book of Isaiah contains, of the return from exile.
We’ll delay further discussion of this prophecy, along with the hymn (chap. xii.) that comes with it, to a separate chapter that will cover all the depictions in the first half of the book of Isaiah regarding the return from exile.
CHAPTER XI.
DRIFTING TO EGYPT.
Isaiah xx.; xxi. 1-10; xxxviii.; xxxix.
Isaiah 20; 21:1-10; 38; 39.
(720-705 B.C.).
(720-705 B.C.)
From 720, when chap. xi. may have been published, to 705—or, by rough reckoning, from the fortieth to the fifty-fifth year of Isaiah's life—we cannot be sure that we have more than one prophecy from him; but two narratives have found a place in his book which relate events that must have taken place between 712 and 705. These narratives are chap. xx.: How Isaiah Walked Stripped and Barefoot for a Sign against Egypt, and chaps. xxxviii. and xxxix.: The Sickness of Hezekiah, with the Hymn he wrote, and his Behaviour before the Envoys from Babylon. The single prophecy belonging to this period is chap. xxi. 1-10, Oracle of the Wilderness of the Sea, which announces the fall of Babylon. There has been considerable debate about the authorship of this oracle, but Cheyne, mainly following Dr. Kleinert, gives substantial reasons for leaving it with Isaiah. We postpone the full exposition of chaps. xxxviii., xxxix., to a later stage, as here it would only interrupt the history. But we will make use of chaps. xx. and xxi. 1-10 in the course of the following historical sketch, which is intended to connect the first great period of Isaiah's prophesying, 740-720, with the second, 705-701.
From 720, when chapter xi might have been published, to 705—or roughly from the fortieth to the fifty-fifth year of Isaiah's life—we can't be certain we have more than one prophecy from him. However, two narratives have found their way into his book that relate to events likely occurring between 712 and 705. These narratives are chapter xx: How Isaiah Walked Stripped and Barefoot as a Sign against Egypt, and chapters xxxviii and xxxix: The Sickness of Hezekiah, including the Hymn he wrote and his Behavior before the Envoys from Babylon. The single prophecy from this period is chapter xxi, verses 1-10, Oracle of the Wilderness of the Sea, which predicts the fall of Babylon. There has been a lot of discussion about who authored this oracle, but Cheyne, mainly following Dr. Kleinert, provides good reasons to attribute it to Isaiah. We will delay the complete discussion of chapters xxxviii and xxxix for later, as it would only disrupt the history here. However, we will reference chapters xx and xxi, verses 1-10 throughout the subsequent historical overview, which aims to connect the first major period of Isaiah's prophecies, 740-720, with the second, 705-701.
[197]All these fifteen years, 720-705, Jerusalem was drifting to the refuge into which she plunged at the end of them—drifting to Egypt. Ahaz had firmly bound his people to Assyria, and in his reign there was no talk of an Egyptian alliance. But in 725, when the overflowing scourge of Assyrian invasion threatened to sweep into Judah as well as Samaria, Isaiah's words give us some hint of a recoil in the politics of Jerusalem towards the southern power. The covenants with death and hell, which the men of scorn flaunted in his face as he harped on the danger from Assyria, may only have been the old treaties with Assyria herself, but the falsehood and lies that went with them were most probably intrigues with Egypt. Any Egyptian policy, however, that may have formed in Jerusalem before 719, was entirely discredited by the crushing defeat, which in that year Sargon inflicted upon the empire of the Nile, almost on her own borders, at Rafia.
[197]For all these fifteen years, from 720 to 705, Jerusalem was gradually moving towards the refuge she ultimately sought at the end of this period—Egypt. Ahaz had firmly tied his people to Assyria, and during his reign, there was no discussion of an alliance with Egypt. But in 725, when the overwhelming threat of Assyrian invasion was about to engulf Judah as well as Samaria, Isaiah's words suggest a shift in the political landscape of Jerusalem towards this southern power. The covenants with death and hell, which the scoffers brandished in front of him while he warned about the danger from Assyria, may have just been the old treaties with Assyria itself, but the falsehood and lies that accompanied them likely involved secret dealings with Egypt. Any Egyptian strategy that may have existed in Jerusalem before 719 was completely undermined by the devastating defeat that Sargon dealt to the Egyptian empire that year, almost at her doorstep, at Rafia.
Years of quietness for Palestine followed this decisive battle. Sargon, whose annals engraved on the great halls of Khorsabad enable us to read the history of the period year by year, tells us that his next campaigns were to the north of his empire, and till 711 he alludes to Palestine only to say that tribute was coming in regularly, or to mention the deportation to Hamath or Samaria of some tribe he had conquered far away. Egypt, however, was everywhere busy among his feudatories. Intrigue was Egypt's forte. She is always represented in Isaiah's pages as the talkative power of many promises. Her fair speech was very sweet to men groaning beneath the military pressure of Assyria. Her splendid past, in conjunction with the largeness of her promise,[198] excited the popular imagination. Centres of her influence gathered in every state. An Egyptian party formed in Jerusalem. Their intrigue pushed mines in all directions, and before the century was out the Assyrian peace in Western Asia was broken by two great Explosions. The first of these, in 711, was local and abortive; the second, in 705, was universal, and for a time entirely destroyed the Assyrian supremacy.
Years of silence for Palestine followed this pivotal battle. Sargon, whose records carved in the grand halls of Khorsabad allow us to track the history of the time year by year, tells us that his subsequent campaigns were to the north of his empire. Until 711, he only mentioned Palestine to note that tribute was coming in regularly or to refer to the deportation to Hamath or Samaria of some tribe he had conquered far away. Meanwhile, Egypt was actively engaging with his vassal states. Intrigue was Egypt's specialty. She is often depicted in Isaiah’s writings as the talkative power filled with empty promises. Her flattering words were very appealing to those weighed down by the military might of Assyria. Her glorious past, combined with the grandeur of her promises, [198] captured the public's imagination. Centers of her influence emerged in every state. An Egyptian faction formed in Jerusalem. Their scheming spread in every direction, and before the century ended, the Assyrian peace in Western Asia was shattered by two major upheavals. The first of these, in 711, was local and unsuccessful; the second, in 705, was widespread and for a time completely dismantled Assyrian dominance.
The centre of the Explosion of 711 was Ashdod, a city of the Philistines. The king had suddenly refused to continue the Assyrian tribute, and Sargon had put another king in his place. But the people—in Ashdod, as everywhere else, it was the people who were fascinated by Egypt—pulled down the Assyrian puppet and elevated Iaman, a friend to Pharaoh. The other cities of the Philistines, with Moab, Edom and Judah, were prepared by Egyptian promise to throw in their lot with the rebels. Sargon gave them no time. "In the wrath of my heart, I did not divide my army, and I did not diminish the ranks, but I marched against Asdod with my warriors, who did not separate themselves from the traces of my sandals. I besieged, I took, Asdod and Gunt-Asdodim.... I then made again these towns. I placed the people whom my arm had conquered. I put over them my lieutenant as governor. I considered them like Assyrians, and they practised obedience."[41] It is upon this campaign of Sargon that Mr. Cheyne argues for the invasion of Judah, to which he assigns so many of Isaiah's prophecies, as, e.g., chaps. i. and x. 5-34. Some day Assyriology may give us proof of this supposition. We are without it just now.[199] Sargon speaks no word of invading Judah, and the only part of the book of Isaiah that unmistakably refers to this time is the picturesque narrative of chap. xx.
The center of the Explosion of 711 was Ashdod, a city of the Philistines. The king suddenly refused to keep paying tribute to the Assyrians, and Sargon replaced him with another king. But the people—in Ashdod, like everywhere else, they were enchanted by Egypt—overthrew the Assyrian puppet and promoted Iaman, a friend of Pharaoh. The other cities of the Philistines, along with Moab, Edom, and Judah, were ready, thanks to Egyptian promises, to side with the rebels. Sargon didn't waste any time. "In my anger, I didn’t split my army or reduce the numbers; I marched against Ashdod with my warriors, who didn’t stray from my footsteps. I besieged and captured Ashdod and Gunt-Asdodim... I then rebuilt these towns. I placed the people I had conquered under my lieutenant as governor. I treated them like Assyrians, and they showed obedience." [41] It is on this campaign of Sargon that Mr. Cheyne bases his argument for the invasion of Judah, to which he attributes many of Isaiah's prophecies, such as, e.g., chapters i. and x. 5-34. Someday, Assyriology might provide evidence for this theory. Right now, we don’t have any. [199] Sargon doesn’t mention invading Judah, and the only part of Isaiah's book that clearly refers to this time is the vivid narrative in chapter xx.
In this we are told that in the year the Tartan, the Assyrian commander-in-chief, came to Ashdod when Sargon king of Assyria sent him [that is to be supposed the year of the first revolt in Ashdod, to which Sargon himself did not come], and he fought against Ashdod and took it:—in that time Jehovah had spoken by the hand of Isaiah the son of Amoz, saying, Go and loose the sackcloth, the prophet's robe, from off thy loins, and thy sandal strip from off thy foot; and he did so, walking naked, that is unfrocked, and barefoot. For Egyptian intrigue was already busy; the temporary success of the Tartan at Ashdod did not discourage it, and it needed a protest. And Jehovah said, As My servant Isaiah hath walked unfrocked and barefoot three years for a sign and a portent against Egypt and against Ethiopia [note the double name, for the country was now divided between two rulers, the secret of her impotence to interfere forcibly in Palestine] so shall the king of Assyria lead away the captives of Egypt and exiles of Ethiopia, young and old, stripped and barefoot, and with buttocks uncovered, to the shame of Egypt. And they shall be dismayed and ashamed, because of Ethiopia their expectation and because of Egypt their boast. And the inhabitant of this coastland [that is, all Palestine, and a name for it remarkably similar to the phrase used by Sargon, "the people of Philistia, Judah, Edom and Moab, dwelling by the sea"[42]] shall say in that day, Behold, such is our expectation, whither we had[200] fled for help to deliver ourselves from the king of Assyria, and how shall we escape—we?
In this, we are told that in the year the Tartan, the Assyrian commander-in-chief, came to Ashdod when Sargon, king of Assyria, sent him [this is supposed to be the year of the first revolt in Ashdod, which Sargon himself didn’t attend], and he fought against Ashdod and captured it:—during that time, Jehovah spoke through Isaiah, the son of Amoz, saying, Go and take off the sackcloth, the prophet's robe, from around your waist, and remove your sandals from your feet; and he did so, walking naked, which means undressed, and barefoot. Egyptian intrigue was already at play; the temporary victory of the Tartan at Ashdod didn’t discourage it, and it needed a response. And Jehovah said, Just as My servant Isaiah has walked undressed and barefoot for three years as a sign and a portent against Egypt and against Ethiopia [note the double naming, as the country was now split between two rulers, indicating its inability to intervene forcefully in Palestine] so shall the king of Assyria lead away the captives of Egypt and exiles of Ethiopia, young and old, stripped and barefoot, and with their backs exposed, to the shame of Egypt. And they shall be horrified and ashamed, because of Ethiopia, their hope, and because of Egypt, their pride. And the inhabitants of this coastland [meaning all of Palestine, and a name for it strikingly similar to the phrase used by Sargon, "the people of Philistia, Judah, Edom and Moab, dwelling by the sea"[42]] shall say in that day, Look, this is our hope, to whom we fled for help to save ourselves from the king of Assyria, and how shall we escape—we?
This parade of Isaiah for three years, unfrocked and barefoot, is another instance of that habit on which we remarked in connection with chap. viii. 1: the habit of finally carrying everything committed to him before the bar of the whole nation. It was to the mass of the people God said, Come and let us reason together. Let us not despise Isaiah in his shirt any more than we do Diogenes in his tub, or with a lantern in his hand, seeking for a man by its rays at noonday. He was bent on startling the popular conscience, because he held it true that a people's own morals have greater influence on their destinies than the policies of their statesmen. But especially anxious was Isaiah, as we shall again see from chap. xxxi., to bring this Egyptian policy home to the popular conscience. Egypt was a big-mouthed, blustering power, believed in by the mob: to expose her required public, picturesque and persistent advertisement. So Isaiah continued his walk for three years. The fall of Ashdod, left by Egypt to itself, did not disillusion the Jews, and the rapid disappearance of Sargon to another part of his empire where there was trouble, gave the Egyptians audacity to continue their intrigues against him.[43]
This three-year parade of Isaiah, walking barefoot and in rags, is another example of what we mentioned in connection with chap. viii. 1: his habit of bringing everything entrusted to him before the whole nation. God called out to the people, Come and let us reason together. Let’s not look down on Isaiah in his shirt any more than we do Diogenes in his tub, or with a lantern, searching for a man in broad daylight. He aimed to shock the public’s conscience because he believed that a society’s morals have a greater impact on their future than the decisions of their leaders. Isaiah was especially eager, as we will see again in chap. xxxi., to make the people aware of this Egyptian policy. Egypt was a loud and arrogant power, trusted by the masses; exposing her required public, striking, and consistent attention. So Isaiah kept walking for three years. The fall of Ashdod, left to fend for itself by Egypt, didn’t open the Jews' eyes, and Sargon's quick departure to another troubled part of his empire encouraged the Egyptians to pursue their plans against him. [43]
Sargon's new trouble had broken out in Babylon, and was much more serious than any revolt in Syria. Merodach Baladan, king of Chaldea, was no ordinary vassal, but as dangerous a rival as Egypt. When he rose, it meant a contest between Babylon and Nineveh for the sovereignty of the world. He had long been preparing for war. He had an alliance with Elam, and[201] the tribes of Mesopotamia were prepared for his signal of revolt. Among the charges brought against him by Sargon is that, "against the will of the gods of Babylon, he had sent during twelve years ambassadors." One of these embassies may have been that which came to Hezekiah after his great sickness (chap. xxxix.). And Hezekiah was glad of them, and showed them the house of his spicery, the silver, and the gold, and the spices, and the precious oil, and all the house of his armour and all that was found in his treasures; there was nothing in his house nor in all his dominion that Hezekiah showed them not. Isaiah was indignant. He had hitherto kept the king from formally closing with Egypt; now he found him eager for an alliance with another of the powers of man. But instead of predicting the captivity of Babylon, as he predicted the captivity of Egypt, by the hand of Assyria, Isaiah declared, according to chap. xxxix., that Babylon would some day take Israel captive; and Hezekiah had to content himself with the prospect that this calamity was not to happen in his time.
Sargon's new problem had emerged in Babylon, and it was far more serious than any uprising in Syria. Merodach Baladan, king of Chaldea, was not just any vassal; he was as formidable a rival as Egypt. His rise meant a showdown between Babylon and Nineveh for dominance over the world. He had been preparing for war for a long time. He formed an alliance with Elam, and the tribes of Mesopotamia were ready to respond to his call for rebellion. Among the accusations against him by Sargon is that, "against the will of the gods of Babylon, he had sent ambassadors for twelve years." One of these missions might have been the one that visited Hezekiah after his serious illness (chap. xxxix.). And Hezekiah was pleased with them, showing them his spice room, the silver, gold, spices, precious oil, all his weapons, and everything found in his treasures; there was nothing in his palace or throughout his kingdom that Hezekiah did not show them. Isaiah was furious. He had previously kept the king from officially aligning with Egypt; now he found him eager to form an alliance with another power. But instead of forecasting Babylon's captivity, as he had with Egypt by Assyria, Isaiah proclaimed, according to chap. xxxix., that Babylon would eventually capture Israel; and Hezekiah had to accept that this disaster wouldn't occur in his lifetime.
Isaiah's prediction of the exile of Israel to Babylon is a matter of difficulty. The difficulty, however, is not that of conceiving how he could have foreseen an event which took place more than a century later. Even in 711 Babylon was not an unlikely competitor for the supremacy of the nations. Sargon himself felt that it was a crisis to meet her. Very little might have transferred the seat of power from the Tigris to the Euphrates. What, therefore, more probable than that when Hezekiah disclosed to these envoys the whole state of his resources, and excused himself by saying that they were come from a far country, even Babylon, Isaiah, seized by a strong sense of how near Babylon stood to the throne of the nations, should laugh to[202] scorn the excuse of distance, and tell the king that his anxiety to secure an alliance had only led him to place the temptation to rob him in the face of a power that was certainly on the way to be able to do it? No, the difficulty is not that the prophet foretold a captivity of the Jews in Babylon, but that we cannot reconcile what he says of that captivity with his intimation of the immediate destruction of Babylon, which has come down to us in chap. xxi. 1-10.
Isaiah's prediction about Israel's exile to Babylon is a complicated issue. The complication, however, isn't about imagining how he could have predicted an event that happened over a hundred years later. Even back in 711, Babylon wasn't an unlikely contender for being a dominant nation. Sargon himself recognized it as a situation that needed attention. It wouldn't have taken much for the power to shift from the Tigris to the Euphrates. So, what could be more likely than that when Hezekiah revealed all his resources to these envoys and justified himself by saying they had come from a distant land, Babylon, Isaiah, fully aware of how close Babylon was to the seat of power among nations, should dismiss the idea of distance and tell the king that his eagerness to form an alliance had only made him vulnerable to being robbed by a rising power capable of doing so? No, the issue isn't that the prophet predicted the Jews would be captured in Babylon, but rather that we struggle to reconcile what he says about that captivity with his warning of Babylon's imminent destruction, which we've received in chap. xxi. 1-10.
In this prophecy Isaiah regards Babylon as he has been regarding Egypt—certain to go down before Assyria, and therefore wholly unprofitable to Judah. If the Jews still thought of returning to Egypt when Sargon hurried back from completing her discomfiture in order to beset Babylon, Isaiah would tell them it was no use. Assyria has brought her full power to bear on the Babylonians; Elam and Media are with her. He travails with pain for the result. Babylon is not expecting a siege; but preparing the table, eating and drinking, when suddenly the cry rings through her, "Arise, ye princes; anoint the shield. The enemy is upon us." So terrible and so sudden a warrior is this Sargon! At his words nations move; when he saith, Go up, O Elam! Besiege, O Media! it is done. And he falls upon his foes before their weapons are ready. Then the prophet shrinks back from the result of his imagination of how it happened—for that is too painful—upon the simple certainty, which God revealed to him, that it must happen. As surely as Sargon's columns went against Babylon, so surely must the message return that Babylon has fallen. Isaiah puts it this way. The Lord bade him get on his watchtower—that is his phrase for observing the signs of the times—and speak whatever he saw. And he saw a military column on the[203] march: a troop of horsemen by pairs, a troop of asses, a troop of camels. It passed him out of sight, and he hearkened very diligently for news. But none came. It was a long campaign. And he cried like a lion for impatience, O my Lord, I stand continually upon the watchtower by day, and am set in my ward every night. Till at last, behold, there came a troop of men, horsemen in pairs, and now one answered and said, Fallen, fallen is Babylon, and all the images of her gods he hath broken to the ground. The meaning of this very elliptical passage is just this: as surely as the prophet saw Sargon's columns go out against Babylon, so sure was he of her fall. Turning to his Jerusalem, he says, My own threshed one, son of my floor, that which I have heard from Jehovah of hosts, the God of Israel, have I declared unto you. How gladly would I have told you otherwise! But this is His message and His will. Everything must go down before this Assyrian.
In this prophecy, Isaiah sees Babylon the same way he sees Egypt—definitely facing defeat against Assyria, making it completely useless to Judah. If the Jews were still thinking about returning to Egypt when Sargon rushed back from defeating her to surround Babylon, Isaiah would tell them it's pointless. Assyria has unleashed its full strength against the Babylonians; Elam and Media are joining forces with them. He feels deep anguish for the outcome. Babylon doesn't expect a siege; instead, they are preparing the table, eating and drinking, when suddenly the alarm sounds, "Arise, you princes; anoint the shield. The enemy is upon us." Sargon is such a fierce and swift warrior! Nations respond to his command; when he says, Go up, O Elam! Besiege, O Media! it happens. He attacks his enemies before they are ready to defend themselves. Then the prophet pulls back from the painful vision of how it unfolds—because that is too hard to bear—but he holds on to the certainty that God revealed to him that it must happen. Just as surely as Sargon's forces advanced against Babylon, so surely will the message come back that Babylon has fallen. Isaiah puts it this way: The Lord told him to get on his watchtower—that's his way of saying to observe the signs of the times—and to speak whatever he saw. And he saw a military force on the[203] march: a group of horsemen in pairs, a group of donkeys, a group of camels. They passed out of his sight, and he listened very carefully for news. But none came. It was a long campaign. And he cried out like a lion in impatience, O my Lord, I stand continually on the watchtower by day and am set in my post every night. Finally, behold, there came a group of men, horsemen in pairs, and now one answered and said, Fallen, fallen is Babylon, and all the images of her gods he has broken to the ground. The meaning of this very concise passage is simple: just as the prophet saw Sargon's forces set out against Babylon, he was certain of her defeat. Turning to his Jerusalem, he says, My own threshed one, son of my floor, that which I have heard from Jehovah of hosts, the God of Israel, I have declared to you. How gladly would I have told you otherwise! But this is His message and His will. Everything must fall before this Assyrian.
Sargon entered Babylon before the year was out, and with her conquest established his fear once more down to the borders of Egypt. In his lifetime neither Judah nor her neighbours attempted again to revolt. But Egypt's intrigue did not cease. Her mines were once more laid, and the feudatories of Assyria only waited for their favourite opportunity, a change of tyrants on the throne at Nineveh. This came very soon. In the fifteenth year of his reign, having finally established his empire, Sargon inscribed on the palace at Khorsabad the following prayer to Assur: "May it be that I, Sargon, who inhabit this palace, may be preserved by destiny during long years for a long life, for the happiness of my body, for the satisfaction of my heart, and may I arrive to my end! May I accumulate in this palace immense treasures, the booties of all countries,[204] the products of mountains and valleys!" The god did not hear. A few months later, in 705, Sargon was murdered; and before Sennacherib, his successor, sat down on the throne, the whole of Assyrian supremacy in the south-west of Asia went up in the air. It was the second of the great Explosions we spoke of, and the rest of Isaiah's prophecies are concerned with its results.
Sargon entered Babylon before the year ended, and with that conquest, he reestablished his power all the way to the borders of Egypt. During his reign, neither Judah nor its neighbors tried to revolt again. But Egypt's scheming didn't stop. Its mines were active once more, and the vassals of Assyria were just waiting for their favored chance—a change of rulers on the throne in Nineveh. That happened soon enough. In the fifteenth year of his reign, after solidifying his empire, Sargon carved the following prayer to Assur on the palace at Khorsabad: "May I, Sargon, who live in this palace, be protected by fate for many years, for a long life, for the wellness of my body, for the joy of my heart, and may I reach my end! May I gather immense treasures in this palace, the spoils of all lands, the products of mountains and valleys!" The god did not respond. A few months later, in 705, Sargon was murdered; and before Sennacherib, his successor, took the throne, all of Assyria's dominance in the southwest of Asia was completely disrupted. This marked the second of the great Explosions we mentioned, and the rest of Isaiah's prophecies deal with its aftermath.
BOOK III.
ORATIONS ON THE EGYPTIAN INTRIGUES AND ORACLES ON FOREIGN NATIONS, 705-702 B.C.
Isaiah:— |
xxix. About 703. |
xxx. A little later. |
xxxi. " " |
xxxii. 1-8. |
xxxii. 9-20. Date uncertain. |
————— |
xiv. 28-xxi. 736-702. |
xxiii. About 703. |
BOOK III.
We now enter the prophecies of Isaiah's old age, those which he published after 705, when his ministry had lasted for at least thirty-five years. They cover the years between 705, the date of Sennacherib's accession to the Assyrian throne, and 701, when his army suddenly disappeared from before Jerusalem.
We now look at the prophecies from Isaiah's later years, those he shared after 705, when he had been ministering for at least thirty-five years. These prophecies span the years from 705, the year Sennacherib took the Assyrian throne, to 701, when his army mysteriously vanished from in front of Jerusalem.
They fall into three groups:—
They fall into three categories:—
1. Chaps. xxix.-xxxii., dealing with Jewish politics while Sennacherib is still far from Palestine, 704-702, and having Egypt for their chief interest, Assyria lowering in the background.
1. Chaps. xxix.-xxxii., which focus on Jewish politics while Sennacherib is still far from Palestine, 704-702, and with Egypt being the main concern, while Assyria looms in the background.
2. Chaps. xiv. 28-xxi. and xxiii., a group of oracles on foreign nations, threatened, like Judah, by Assyria.
2. Chaps. xiv. 28-xxi. and xxiii., a set of messages about foreign nations, facing threats from Assyria, just like Judah.
3. Chaps. i., xxii., and xxxiii., and the historical narrative in xxxvi., and xxxvii., dealing with Sennacherib's invasion of Judah and siege of Jerusalem in 701; Egypt and every foreign nation now fallen out of sight, and the storm about the Holy City too thick for the prophet to see beyond his immediate neighbourhood.
3. Chaps. i., xxii., and xxxiii., and the historical narrative in xxxvi. and xxxvii., covering Sennacherib's invasion of Judah and the siege of Jerusalem in 701; Egypt and every foreign nation have now disappeared from view, and the turmoil surrounding the Holy City is so intense that the prophet cannot see beyond his immediate surroundings.
The first and second of these groups—orations on the intrigues with Egypt and oracles on the foreign nations—delivered while Sennacherib was still far[208] from Syria, form the subject of this Third Book of our exposition.
The first and second of these groups—speeches on the dealings with Egypt and discussions on foreign nations—given while Sennacherib was still far[208] from Syria, are the focus of this Third Book of our explanation.
The prophecies on the siege of Jerusalem are sufficiently numerous and distinctive to be put by themselves, along with their appendix (xxxviii., xxxix.), in our Fourth Book.
The prophecies about the siege of Jerusalem are numerous and unique enough to be set apart, along with their appendix (xxxviii., xxxix.), in our Fourth Book.
CHAPTER XII.
ARIEL, ARIEL.
Isaiah xxix. (about 703 B.C.).
Isaiah xxix. (around 703 B.C.).
In 705 Sargon, King of Assyria, was murdered, and Sennacherib, his second son, succeeded him. Before the new ruler mounted the throne, the vast empire, which his father had consolidated, broke into rebellion, and down to the borders of Egypt cities and tribes declared themselves again independent. Sennacherib attacked his problem with Assyrian promptitude. There were two forces, to subdue which at the beginning made the reduction of the rest certain: Assyria's vassal kingdom and future rival for the supremacy of the world, Babylon; and her present rival, Egypt. Sennacherib marched on Babylon first.
In 705, Sargon, King of Assyria, was killed, and Sennacherib, his second son, took over. Before the new king could take the throne, the vast empire that his father had built fell into rebellion, and cities and tribes all the way to the borders of Egypt declared their independence again. Sennacherib faced this issue with the usual Assyrian decisiveness. There were two main forces that, if subdued at the start, would ensure control over the rest: Assyria's vassal kingdom and future competitor for global dominance, Babylon; and its current rival, Egypt. Sennacherib first marched on Babylon.
While he did so the smaller States prepared to resist him. Too small to rely on their own resources, they looked to Egypt, and among others who sought help in that quarter was Judah. There had always been, as we have seen, an Egyptian party among the politicians of Jerusalem; and Assyria's difficulties now naturally increased its influence. Most of the prophecies in chaps. xxix.-xxxii. are forward to condemn the alliance with Egypt and the irreligious politics of which it was the fruit.
While he did that, the smaller states got ready to oppose him. They were too small to depend on their own resources, so they turned to Egypt for help, and Judah was one of those asking for assistance. As we’ve noted before, there had always been an Egyptian faction among the politicians in Jerusalem, and Assyria's troubles naturally boosted its influence. Most of the prophecies in chapters 29-32 strongly condemn the alliance with Egypt and the irreligious politics that stemmed from it.
[210]At the beginning, however, other facts claim Isaiah's attention. After the first excitement, consequent on the threats of Sennacherib, the politicians do not seem to have been specially active. Sennacherib found the reduction of Babylon a harder task than he expected, and in the end it turned out to be three years before he was free to march upon Syria. As one winter after another left the work of the Assyrian army in Mesopotamia still unfinished, the political tension in Judah must have relaxed. The Government—for King Hezekiah seems at last to have been brought round to believe in Egypt—pursued their negotiations no longer with that decision and real patriotism, which the sense of near danger rouses in even the most selfish and mistaken of politicians, but rather with the heedlessness of principle, the desire to show their own cleverness and the passion for intrigue which run riot among statesmen, when danger is near enough to give an excuse for doing something, but too far away to oblige anything to be done in earnest. Into this false ease, and the meaningless, faithless politics, which swarmed in it, Isaiah hurled his strong prophecy of chap. xxix. Before he exposes in chaps. xxx., xxxi., the folly of trusting to Egypt in the hour of danger, he has here the prior task of proving that hour to be near and very terrible. It is but one instance of the ignorance and fickleness of the people, that their prophet has first to rouse them to a sense of their peril, and then to restrain their excitement under it from rushing headlong for help to Egypt.
[210]At first, though, there were other issues that caught Isaiah's attention. After the initial excitement caused by Sennacherib's threats, it seems the politicians weren't particularly active. Sennacherib found it harder to take Babylon than expected, and ultimately it took him three years before he could move on to Syria. As winter after winter passed, leaving the Assyrian army's work in Mesopotamia unfinished, the political tension in Judah likely eased. The government—since King Hezekiah seems to have been convinced by Egypt—pursued their negotiations without the strong resolve and true patriotism that the presence of imminent danger usually stirs in even the most self-serving and misguided politicians. Instead, they acted with careless principles, a desire to show off their intelligence, and a passion for political maneuvering that often arises when danger is close enough to justify action but far enough away to avoid serious commitment. Isaiah responded to this false sense of security and the empty, untrustworthy politics around it with a powerful prophecy in chapter 29. Before laying out in chapters 30 and 31 the foolishness of relying on Egypt in a crisis, he first had to establish that such a crisis was close and exceptionally dire. It highlights the people's ignorance and capriciousness that their prophet needed to awaken them to their peril and then to cool their frantic rush for help from Egypt.
Chap. xxix. is an obscure oracle, but its obscurity is designed. Isaiah was dealing with a people, in whom political security and religious formalism had stifled both reason and conscience. He sought to rouse them[211] by a startling message in a mysterious form. He addressed the city by an enigma:—
Chap. xxix. is an ambiguous prophecy, but its ambiguity is intentional. Isaiah was engaging with a people whose political stability and religious rituals had smothered both logic and moral awareness. He aimed to awaken them[211] with a shocking message presented in a cryptic way. He spoke to the city using a riddle:—
Ho! Ari-El, Ari-El! City David beleaguered! Add a year to a year, let the feasts run their round, then will I bring straitness upon Ari-El, and there shall be moaning and bemoaning,[44] and yet she shall be unto Me as an Ari-El.
Hey! Ari-El, Ari-El! The city of David is under siege! Add a year to a year, let the celebrations go on, then I will bring distress upon Ari-El, and there will be mourning and lamenting,[44] and yet she will still be to Me like an Ari-El.
The general bearing of this enigma became plain enough after the sore siege and sudden deliverance of Jerusalem in 701. But we are unable to make out one or two of its points. Ari-El may mean either The Lion of God (2 Sam. xxiii. 20), or The Hearth of God (Ezek. xliii. 15, 16). If the same sense is to be given to the four utterances of the name, then God's-Lion suits better the description of ver. 4; but God's-Hearth seems suggested by the feminine pronoun in ver. 1, and is a conception to which Isaiah returns in this same group of prophecies (xxxi. 9). It is possible that this ambiguity was part of the prophet's design; but if he uses the name in both senses, some of the force of his enigma is lost to us. In any case, however, we get a picturesque form for a plain meaning. In a year after the present year is out, says Isaiah, God Himself will straiten the city, whose inhabitants are now so careless, and she shall be full of mourning and lamentation. Nevertheless in the end she shall be a true Ari-El: be it a true God's-Lion, victor and hero; or a true God's-Hearth, His own inviolate shrine and sanctuary.
The general meaning of this mystery became clear after the intense siege and sudden rescue of Jerusalem in 701. However, we're still unable to understand one or two aspects of it. Ari-El could mean either The Lion of God (2 Sam. xxiii. 20) or The Hearth of God (Ezek. xliii. 15, 16). If we apply the same meaning to the four occurrences of the name, then God's-Lion fits better with the description in verse 4; but God's-Hearth seems to be suggested by the feminine pronoun in verse 1, which is a concept Isaiah refers back to in this same set of prophecies (xxxi. 9). It’s possible that this ambiguity was part of the prophet's intention; however, if he intends the name to have both meanings, some of the impact of his riddle is lost on us. In any case, we get a vivid expression for a straightforward meaning. Isaiah says that in a year after this year ends, God Himself will confine the city, whose residents are currently so indifferent, and it will be filled with mourning and sorrow. Nevertheless, in the end, it shall be a true Ari-El: whether as a true God's-Lion, victor and hero; or a true God's-Hearth, His own untouched shrine and sanctuary.
The next few verses (3-8) expand this warning. In plain words, Jerusalem is to undergo a siege. God Himself shall encamp against thee—round about reads our English version, but more probably, as with the[212] change of a letter, the Septuagint reads it—like David. If we take this second reading, the reference to David in the enigma itself (ver. 1) becomes clear. The prophet has a very startling message to deliver: that God will besiege His own city, the city of David! Before God can make her in truth His own, make her verify her name, He will have to beleaguer and reduce her. For so novel and startling an intimation the prophet pleads a precedent: "City which David himself beleaguered! Once before in thy history, ere the first time thou wast made God's own hearth, thou hadst to be besieged. As then, so now. Before thou canst again be a true Ari-El I must beleaguer thee like David." This reading and interpretation gives to the enigma a reason and a force which it does not otherwise possess.
The next few verses (3-8) expand on this warning. Simply put, Jerusalem is going to face a siege. Our English version says that God Himself will encamp against you—around you, but more likely, as suggested by a letter change in the Septuagint, it reads—like David. If we accept this second interpretation, the reference to David in the enigma itself (ver. 1) becomes clear. The prophet has a shocking message: that God will besiege His own city, the city of David! Before God can truly claim her and make her live up to her name, He must besiege and bring her down. To support such a surprising declaration, the prophet cites a precedent: "City that David himself beleaguered! Once in your history, before you were first made God's true home, you had to be besieged. Just like before, you must face this again. Before you can be a true Ari-El once more, I must beleaguer you like David did." This interpretation gives the enigma a significance and power that it wouldn't otherwise have.
Jerusalem, then, shall be reduced to the very dust, and whine and whimper in it (like a sick lion, if this be the figure the prophet is pursuing), when suddenly it is the surge of her foes—literally thy strangers—whom the prophet sees as small dust, and as passing chaff shall the surge of tyrants be; yea, it shall be in the twinkling of an eye, suddenly. From Jehovah of hosts shall she be visited with thunder and with earthquake and a great noise,—storm-wind, and tempest and the flame of fire devouring. And it shall be as a dream, a vision of the night, the surge of all the nations that war against Ariel, yea all that war against her and her stronghold, and they that press in upon her. And it shall be as if the hungry had been dreaming, and lo! he was eating; but he hath awaked, and his soul is empty: and as if the thirsty had been dreaming, and lo! he was drinking; but he hath awaked, and lo! he is faint, and his soul is ravenous: thus shall be the surge of all the nations that war against Mount Zion. Now that is a very[213] definite prediction, and in its essentials was fulfilled. In the end Jerusalem was invested by Sennacherib, and reduced to sore straits, when very suddenly—it would appear from other records, in a single night—the beleaguering force disappeared. This actually happened; and although the main business of a prophet, as we now clearly understand, was not to predict definite events, yet, since the result here predicted was one on which Isaiah staked his prophetic reputation and pledged the honour of Jehovah and the continuance of the true religion among men, it will be profitable for us to look at it for a little.
Jerusalem will be brought down to the ground, crying and grieving in its dust (like a sick lion, if that's the image the prophet is using), when suddenly it is the attack of her enemies—literally your strangers—whom the prophet sees as small dust, and like passing chaff shall be the attack of tyrants; yes, it will happen in the blink of an eye, suddenly. From the Lord of hosts, she will be struck with thunder, an earthquake, and a great noise—storm winds, a tempest, and the fire consuming all. It will be like a dream, a vision of the night, the onslaught of all the nations that fight against Ariel, yes, all that war against her and her stronghold, and those that press in on her. It will be as if the hungry were dreaming and thought they were eating; but they wake up, and their soul is empty: and like the thirsty dreaming that they were drinking; but they wake up, and lo! they are faint, and their soul craves: this is how the onslaught of all the nations that war against Mount Zion will be. Now that is a very [213] definite prediction, and in its essentials was fulfilled. In the end, Jerusalem was surrounded by Sennacherib and faced great distress when suddenly—it appears from other records, in a single night—the besieging army vanished. This really happened; and although the main role of a prophet, as we now see, was not to predict specific events, since the outcome predicted was one on which Isaiah based his prophetic reputation and the honor of the Lord and the continuation of true religion among people, it will be beneficial for us to examine it for a moment.
Isaiah foretells a great event and some details. The event is a double one: the reduction of Jerusalem to the direst straits by siege and her deliverance by the sudden disappearance of the besieging army. The details are that the siege will take place after a year (though the prophet's statement of time is perhaps too vague to be treated as a prediction), and that the deliverance will come as a great natural convulsion—thunder, earthquake and fire—which it certainly did not do. The double event, however, stripped of these details, did essentially happen.
Isaiah predicts a major event and some specifics. The event has two parts: Jerusalem facing severe hardship from a siege and her rescue through the sudden vanishing of the attacking army. The specifics are that the siege will happen in about a year (although the prophet's timeframe might be too ambiguous to be seen as a clear prediction), and the rescue will occur due to a massive natural disaster—thunder, earthquake, and fire—which definitely did not happen. However, the two-part event, excluding these details, did essentially occur.
Now it is plain that any one with a considerable knowledge of the world at that day must easily have been able to assert the probability of a siege of Jerusalem by the mixed nations who composed Sennacherib's armies. Isaiah's orations are full of proofs of his close acquaintance with the peoples of the world, and Assyria, who was above them. Moreover, his political advice, given at certain crises of Judah's history, was conspicuous not only for its religiousness, but for what we should call its "worldly-wisdom:" it was vindicated by events. Isaiah, however, would not have understood[214] the distinction we have just made. To him political prudence was part of religion. The Lord of hosts is for a spirit of judgement to him that sitteth in judgement, and for strength to them that turn back the battle to the gate. Knowledge of men, experience of nations, the mental strength which never forgets history, and is quick to mark new movements as they rise, Isaiah would have called the direct inspiration of God. And it was certainly these qualities in this Hebrew, which provided him with the materials for his prediction of the siege of Jerusalem.
Now it's clear that anyone with a good understanding of the world at that time could easily have predicted a siege of Jerusalem by the various nations that made up Sennacherib's armies. Isaiah's speeches are filled with evidence of his deep knowledge of the people around him and the power of Assyria, which was above them all. Furthermore, his political advice, given during key moments in Judah's history, was remarkable not only for its religious nature but also for what we would call its "worldly wisdom;" it was proven right by events. However, Isaiah wouldn’t have recognized the distinction we just made. For him, political caution was part of religion. The Lord of hosts gives a spirit of judgment to those who sit in judgment, and strength to those who push back the battle to the gate. Understanding people, experience with nations, and a mental strength that never forgets history and quickly recognizes new developments would have been seen by Isaiah as direct inspiration from God. And it was certainly these qualities in this Hebrew that provided him with the insights for his prediction of the siege of Jerusalem.
But it has not been found that such talents by themselves enable statesmen calmly to face the future, or clearly to predict it. Such knowledge of the past, such vigilance for the present, by themselves only embarrass, and often deceive. They are the materials for prediction, but a ruling principle is required to arrange them. A general may have a strong and well-drilled force under him, and a miserably weak foe in front; but if the sun is not going to rise to-morrow, if the laws of nature are not going to hold, his familiarity with his soldiers and expertness in handling them will not give him confidence to offer battle. He takes certain principles for granted, and on these his soldiers become of use to him, and he makes his venture. Even so Isaiah handled his mass of information by the grasp which he had of certain principles, and his facts fell clear into order before his confident eyes. He believed in the real government of God. I also saw the Lord sitting, high and lifted up. He felt that God had even this Assyria in His hands. He knew that all God's ends were righteousness, and he was still of the conviction that Judah for her wickedness required punishment at the Lord's hands. Grant[215] these convictions to him in the superhuman strength in which he tells us he was conscious of receiving them from God, and it is easy to see how Isaiah could not help predicting a speedy siege of Jerusalem, how he already beheld the valleys around her bristling with barbarian spears.
But it's been shown that having such talents on their own doesn't allow statesmen to calmly face the future or accurately predict it. A strong understanding of the past and being alert to the present can actually complicate things and often mislead. They provide the raw data for predictions, but you need a guiding principle to make sense of it all. A general may have a well-trained army and a weak enemy in front of him, but if the sun isn’t going to rise tomorrow or if the laws of nature aren't going to apply, his knowledge of his troops and his skill in leading them won’t give him the confidence to engage in battle. He relies on certain basic principles, and it's on those that his soldiers become useful, allowing him to take action. Similarly, Isaiah used his vast amount of information by drawing on certain principles, and his facts fell neatly into place before his confident eyes. He believed in the true governance of God. I also saw the Lord sitting, high and lifted up. He felt that God had Assyria under control. He understood that all of God’s purposes were just, and he still believed that Judah needed to face punishment for her wrongdoing. Given his convictions and the extraordinary strength he felt he received from God, it's clear how Isaiah couldn't help but predict a swift siege of Jerusalem and how he envisioned the valleys around her filled with enemy spears. Grant[215]
The prediction of the sudden raising of this siege was the equally natural corollary to another religious conviction, which held the prophet with as much intensity, as that which possessed him with the need of Judah's punishment. Isaiah never slacked his hold on the truth that in the end God would save Zion, and keep her for Himself. Through whatever destruction, a root and remnant of the Jewish people must survive. Zion is impregnable because God is in her, and because her inviolateness is necessary for the continuance of true religion in the world. Therefore as confident as his prediction of the siege of Jerusalem is Isaiah's prediction of her delivery. And while the prophet wraps the fact in vague circumstance, while he masks, as it were, his ignorance of how in detail it will actually take place by calling up a great natural convulsion, yet he makes it abundantly clear—as, with his religious convictions and his knowledge of the Assyrian power, he cannot help doing—that the deliverance will be unexpected and unexplainable by the natural circumstances of the Jews themselves, that it will be evident as the immediate deed of God.
The prediction of the sudden lifting of this siege was a natural extension of another deeply held religious belief, which gripped the prophet just as fiercely as his conviction in the need for Judah's punishment. Isaiah never let go of the truth that, in the end, God would save Zion and protect it for Himself. No matter what destruction occurred, a remnant of the Jewish people had to survive. Zion is unassailable because God is within her, and because her integrity is essential for the survival of true religion in the world. Therefore, as sure as he was about the siege of Jerusalem, Isaiah was equally certain about her rescue. While the prophet presents this fact in vague terms, masking his uncertainty about the specific details by invoking a great natural upheaval, he clearly indicates—given his religious beliefs and understanding of Assyrian power—that the deliverance will come unexpectedly and cannot be explained by the Jews' own circumstances; it will be unmistakably the act of God.
It is well for us to understand this. We shall get rid of the mechanical idea of prophecy, according to which prophets made exact predictions of fact by some particular and purely official endowment. We shall feel that prediction of this kind was due to the most unmistakeable inspiration, the influence upon the prophet's[216] knowledge of affairs of two powerful religious convictions, for which he himself was strongly sure that he had the warrant of the Spirit of God.
It’s important for us to grasp this. We need to let go of the mechanical notion of prophecy, which sees prophets making precise predictions through some specific and purely official gift. Instead, we’ll recognize that this kind of prediction came from clear inspiration, influenced by two strong religious beliefs that the prophet firmly believed were backed by the Spirit of God.
Into the easy, selfish politics of Jerusalem, then, Isaiah sent this thunderbolt, this definite prediction: that in a year or more Jerusalem would be besieged and reduced to the direst straits. He tells us that it simply dazed the people. They were like men suddenly startled from sleep, who are too stupid to read a message pushed into their hands (vv. 9-12).
Into the simple, self-centered politics of Jerusalem, Isaiah then delivered this shocking message, this clear prediction: that in a year or so, Jerusalem would be under siege and brought to the worst situation. He explains that it completely stunned the people. They were like those suddenly jolted awake, too confused to understand a note handed to them (vv. 9-12).
Then Isaiah gives God's own explanation of this stupidity. The cause of it is simply religious formalism. This people draw nigh unto Me with their mouth, and with their lips do they honour Me, but their heart is far from Me, and their fear of Me is a mere commandment of men, a thing learned by rote. This was what Israel called religion—bare ritual and doctrine, a round of sacrifices and prayers in adherence to the tradition of the fathers. But in life they never thought of God. It did not occur to these citizens of Jerusalem that He cared about their politics, their conduct of justice, or their discussions and bargains with one another. Of these they said, taking their own way, Who seeth us, and who knoweth us? Only in the Temple did they feel God's fear, and there merely in imitation of one another. None had an original vision of God in real life; they learned other men's thoughts about Him, and took other men's words upon their lips, while their heart was far away. In fact, speaking words and listening to words had wearied the spirit and stifled the conscience of them.
Then Isaiah gives God's own explanation of this stupidity. The cause of it is simply religious formalism. This people honor Me with their mouths and lips, but their hearts are far from Me, and their fear of Me is just a rule learned by rote. This is what Israel considered religion—empty rituals and teachings, a routine of sacrifices and prayers following the traditions of their ancestors. Yet, in their daily lives, they never thought about God. The citizens of Jerusalem didn't realize that He cared about their politics, their sense of justice, or their interactions and deals with one another. They said, going about their own ways, Who sees us, and who knows us? Only in the Temple did they feel genuine fear of God, and even there, it was just copying each other. No one had an authentic experience of God in everyday life; they repeated what others thought about Him and used others' words, while their hearts remained distant. In fact, speaking and listening to words had drained their spirits and stifled their consciences.
For such a disposition Isaiah says there is only one cure. It is a new edition of his old gospel, that God speaks to us in facts, not forms. Worship and a lifeless[217] doctrine have demoralized this people. God shall make Himself so felt in real life that even their dull senses shall not be able to mistake Him. Therefore, behold, I am proceeding to work marvellously upon this people, a marvellous work and a wonder! and the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, and the cleverness of their clever ones shall be obscured. This is not the promise of what we call a miracle. It is a historical event on the same theatre as the politicians are showing their cleverness, but it shall put them all to shame, and by its force make the dullest feel that God's own hand is in it. What the people had ceased to attribute to Jehovah was ordinary intelligence; they had virtually said, He hath no understanding. The marvellous work, therefore, which He threatens shall be a work of wisdom, not some convulsion of nature to cow their spirits, but a wonderful political result, that shall shame their conceit of cleverness, and teach them reverence for the will and skill of God. Are the politicians trying to change the surface of the world, thinking that they are turning things upside down, and supposing that they can keep God out of account: Who seeth us, and who knoweth us? God Himself is the real Arranger and Politician. He will turn things upside down! Compared with their attempt, how vast His results shall be! As if the whole surface of the earth were altered, Lebanon changed into garden-land, and garden-land counted as forest! But this, of course, is metaphor. The intent of the miracle is to show that God hath understanding; therefore it must be a work, the prudence and intellectual force of which politicians can appreciate, and it shall take place in their politics. But not for mere astonishment's sake is the wonder to be done. For blessing and morality shall it be: to cure the deaf and blind; to give[218] to the meek and the poor a new joy; to confound the tyrant and the scorner; to make Israel worthy of God and her own great fathers. Therefore thus saith Jehovah to the house of Jacob, He that redeemed Abraham: Not now ashamed shall Jacob be, and not now shall his countenance blanch. So unworthy hitherto have this stupid people been of so great ancestors! But now when his (Jacob's) children behold the work of My hand in the midst of him, they shall hallow My name, yea, they shall hallow the Holy One of Jacob, and the God of Israel shall they make their fear. They also that err in spirit shall know understanding, and they that are unsettled shall learn to accept doctrine.
For such a mindset, Isaiah says there’s only one solution. It’s a new take on his old message: God communicates with us through real experiences, not just rituals. Worship and a lifeless doctrine have demoralized these people. God will make His presence felt in real life so clearly that even the dullest minds won’t mistake Him. So, look, I’m about to do something amazing among this people, a marvelous work and a wonder! The wisdom of their wise men will disappear, and the cleverness of their clever ones will be dimmed. This isn’t just a promise of a miracle. It’s a historical event happening alongside the politicians showcasing their cleverness, but it will expose their folly, causing even the dullest to realize that God is behind it. The people had stopped recognizing ordinary intelligence as coming from Jehovah; they had basically said, He has no understanding. The marvelous work He promises will showcase wisdom, not some natural upheaval to frighten them, but a remarkable political outcome that will shatter their pride in cleverness and teach them to respect God’s will and skill. Are the politicians trying to change the world's surface, thinking they are turning things upside down, believing that they can ignore God: Who sees us, and who knows us? God Himself is the ultimate Organizer and Politician. He will turn things upside down! Compared to their efforts, His results will be enormous! It’s like altering the entire surface of the earth, Lebanon transformed into farmland, and farmland considered as forest! But this is, of course, a metaphor. The purpose of the miracle is to demonstrate that God has understanding; therefore, it must be a work of wisdom and intellect that politicians can recognize, and it will happen in their political realm. But it’s not just meant to amaze. It’s for the purpose of blessing and morality: to heal the deaf and blind, to give[218] the meek and poor a new joy; to humble the tyrant and the scorner; to make Israel worthy of God and her great ancestors. Therefore, this is what Jehovah says to the house of Jacob, He who redeemed Abraham: Jacob will no longer be ashamed, and his face will not turn pale. This foolish people has been unworthy of such great ancestors! But now when his (Jacob's) children see the work of My hand among them, they will honor My name; yes, they will honor the Holy One of Jacob, and they will revere the God of Israel. Those who have strayed in spirit will gain understanding, and those who are unsettled will learn to accept doctrine.
Such is the meaning of this strong chapter. It is instructive in two ways.
Such is the meaning of this powerful chapter. It teaches us in two ways.
First, it very clearly declares Isaiah's view of the method of God's revelation. Isaiah says nothing of the Temple, the Shechinah, the Altar, or the Scripture; but he points out how much the exclusive confinement of religion to forms and texts has deadened the hearts of his countrymen towards God. In your real life, he says to them, you are to seek, and you shall find, Him. There He is evident in miracles,—not physical interruptions and convulsions, but social mercies and moral providences. The quickening of conscience, the dispersion of ignorance, poor men awakening to the fact that God is with them, the overthrow of the social tyrant, history's plain refutation of the atheist, the growth of civic justice and charity—In these, said the Hebrew prophet to the Old Testament believer, Behold your God!
First, it clearly expresses Isaiah's perspective on how God reveals Himself. Isaiah doesn’t mention the Temple, the Shechinah, the Altar, or Scripture; instead, he emphasizes how confining religion to rituals and texts has hardened his people's hearts towards God. In your everyday life, he tells them, you need to seek Him, and you will find Him. He is evident in miracles—not dramatic interruptions but in social kindness and moral guidance. The awakening of conscience, the spread of knowledge, the realization among the poor that God is with them, the downfall of the oppressor, history’s clear challenge to atheism, and the rise of civic justice and compassion—In these, the Hebrew prophet said to the Old Testament believer, Behold your God!
Wherefore, secondly, we also are to look for God in events and deeds. We are to know that nothing can compensate us for the loss of the open vision of God's[219] working in history and in life about us,—not ecstasy of worship nor orthodoxy of doctrine. To confine our religion to these latter things is to become dull towards God even in them, and to forget Him everywhere else. And this is a fault of our day, just as it was of Isaiah's. So much of our fear of God is conventional, orthodox and not original, a trick caught from men's words or fashions, not a part of ourselves, nor won, like all that is real in us, from contact with real life. In our politics, in our conduct with men, in the struggle of our own hearts for knowledge and for temperance, and in service—there we are to learn to fear God. But there, and wherever else we are busy, self comes too much in the way; we are fascinated with our own cleverness; we ignore God, saying, Who seeth us? who knoweth us? We get to expect Him only in the Temple and on the Sabbath, and then only to influence our emotions. But it is in deeds, and where we feel life most real, that we are to look for Him. He makes Himself evident to us by wonderful works.
Therefore, secondly, we should also seek God in events and actions. We need to understand that nothing can replace the loss of the clear vision of God's[219] presence in history and in our lives—not the high feelings of worship nor strict adherence to doctrine. Reducing our religion to just these elements makes us numb to God even in those aspects and causes us to forget Him everywhere else. This is a challenge of our time, just as it was for Isaiah. Much of our fear of God is conventional, orthodox, and not personal, a response learned from other people's words or trends, rather than a genuine part of ourselves developed through real-life experiences. In our politics, our interactions with others, in the struggles of our hearts for understanding and self-control, and in service—there is where we should learn to fear God. But even in those moments, our self-interest gets in the way; we become captivated by our own intelligence; we overlook God, questioning, Who sees us? Who knows us? We tend to expect Him only in the Temple and on the Sabbath, and even then, only to stir our emotions. But it is in our actions, and where we experience life most authentically, that we should look for Him. He reveals Himself to us through remarkable deeds.
For these He has given us three theatres—the Bible, our country's history, and for each man his own life.
For this, He has given us three stages—the Bible, our nation's history, and each person's own life.
We have to take the Bible, and especially the life of Christ, and to tell ourselves that these wonderful events did really take place. In Christ God did dwell; by Christ He spoke to man; man was converted, redeemed, sanctified, beyond all doubt. These were real events. To be convinced of their reality were worth a hundred prayers.
We need to take the Bible, especially the life of Christ, and remind ourselves that these amazing events really happened. In Christ, God was present; through Christ, He communicated with humanity; people were changed, saved, and made holy, without question. These were real events. Being convinced of their reality is worth a hundred prayers.
Then let us follow the example of the Hebrew prophets, and search the history of our own people for the realities of God. Carlyle says in a note to Cromwell's fourth speech to Parliament, that "the Bible of every nation is its own history." This note is drawn[220] from Carlyle by Cromwell's frequent insistence, that we must ever be turning from forms and rituals to study God's will and ways in history. And that speech of Cromwell is perhaps the best sermon ever delivered on the subject of this chapter. For he said: "What are all our histories but God manifesting Himself, that He hath shaken, and tumbled down and trampled upon everything that He hath not planted!" And again, speaking of our own history, he said to the House of Commons: "We are a people with the stamp of God upon us, ... whose appearances and providences among us were not to be outmatched by any story." Truly this is national religion:—the reverential acknowledgment of God's hand in history; the admiration and effort of moral progress; the stirring of conscience when we see wrong; the expectation, when evil abounds, that God will bring justice and purity to us if we labour with Him for them.
Then let’s take a cue from the Hebrew prophets and look into the history of our own people to find the truths about God. Carlyle mentions in a note to Cromwell's fourth speech to Parliament that "the Bible of every nation is its own history." This note reflects Cromwell’s insistence that we should always move beyond forms and rituals to understand God's will and ways through history. That speech by Cromwell is arguably the best sermon ever given on this topic. He stated: "What are all our histories but God revealing Himself, showing how He has shaken, toppled, and crushed everything He hasn’t established!" And when speaking about our history, he told the House of Commons: "We are a people marked by God,... whose events and interventions among us can't be surpassed by any tale." This truly reflects national religion: the respectful recognition of God's influence in history; the appreciation and pursuit of moral progress; the stirring of our conscience when we witness injustice; and the hope, especially in times of evil, that God will restore justice and purity if we work alongside Him for those goals.
But for each man there is the final duty of turning to himself.
But each person has the ultimate responsibility of looking within themselves.
When, sharpening the senses' dullness,
She activates my own life! From this perspective,
Not just a tiny speck, but filled with vastness
With experiences of providence:
And woe to me if, when I look
Based on that record, the only book
Unsealed to me, I pay no attention.
Of all the warnings I've read!'[45]
CHAPTER XIII.
POLITICS AND FAITH.
Isaiah xxx. (ABOUT 702 B.C.).
Isaiah xxx. (ABOUT 702 B.C.).
This prophecy of Isaiah rises out of circumstances a little more developed than those in which chap. xxix. was composed. Sennacherib is still engaged with Babylon, and it seems that it will yet be long before he marches his armies upon Syria. But Isaiah's warning has at last roused the politicians of Judah from their carelessness. We need not suppose that they believed all that Isaiah predicted about the dire siege which Jerusalem should shortly undergo and her sudden deliverance at the hand of the Lord. Without the two strong religious convictions, in the strength of which, as we have seen, he made the prediction, it was impossible to believe that this siege and deliverance must certainly happen. But the politicians were at least startled into doing something. They did not betake themselves to God, to whom it had been the purpose of Isaiah's last oration to shut them up. They only flung themselves with more haste into their intrigues with Egypt. But in truth haste and business were all that was in their politics: these were devoid both of intelligence and faith. Where the sole motive of conduct is fear, whether uneasiness or panic, force may[222] be displayed, but neither sagacity nor any moral quality. This was the case with Judah's Egyptian policy, and Isaiah now spends two chapters in denouncing it. His condemnation is twofold. The negotiations with Egypt, he says, are bad politics and bad religion; but the bad religion is the root and source of the other. Yet while he vents all his scorn on the politics, he uses pity and sweet persuasiveness when he comes to speak of the eternal significance of the religion. The two chapters are also instructive, beyond most others of the Old Testament, in the light they cast on revelation—its scope and methods.
This prophecy of Isaiah comes from a situation that's a bit more complex than the one in chapter 29. Sennacherib is still focused on Babylon, and it seems like it'll be a while before he sends his armies into Syria. However, Isaiah's warning has finally jolted the politicians of Judah out of their apathy. We shouldn't think that they fully believed all of Isaiah's predictions about the terrible siege Jerusalem would soon face and her sudden rescue by the Lord. Without the two strong religious beliefs that underpinned Isaiah's prediction, it was impossible to believe that this siege and deliverance were certain to happen. But at least the politicians were startled enough to take some action. They didn't turn to God, which was the purpose of Isaiah's last speech. Instead, they rushed even more into their schemes with Egypt. Truthfully, their haste and busyness were all that fueled their politics; their actions lacked both insight and faith. When fear—whether discomfort or panic—is the only motivation for behavior, you may see shows of force, but neither wisdom nor any moral quality will be present. This was true of Judah's policy with Egypt, and Isaiah now spends two chapters criticizing it. His condemnation has two parts. He asserts that the negotiations with Egypt are not only poor politics but also a poor reflection of their faith; however, the bad faith is the root cause of the other issue. Yet, while he expresses disdain for their political actions, he speaks with compassion and gentle persuasion when discussing the lasting significance of their faith. The two chapters are also particularly enlightening, offering insight into revelation—its scope and methods.
Isaiah begins with the bad politics. In order to understand how bad they were, we must turn for a little to this Egypt, with whom Judah was now seeking an alliance.
Isaiah starts with the poor politics. To grasp how bad they were, we need to take a moment to consider Egypt, with whom Judah was currently trying to form an alliance.
In our late campaign on the Upper Nile we heard a great deal of the Mudir of Dongola. His province covers part of the ancient kingdom of Ethiopia; and in Meirawi, the village whose name appeared in so many telegrams, we can still discover Meroe, the capital of Ethiopia. Now in Isaiah's day the king of Ethiopia was, what the Mudir of Dongola was at the time of our war, an ambitious person of no small energy; and the ruler of Egypt proper was, what the Khedive was, a person of little influence or resource. Consequently there happened what might have happened a few years ago but for the presence of the British army in Egypt. The Ethiopian came down the Nile, defeated Pharaoh and burned him alive. But he died, and his son died after him; and before their successor could also come down the Nile, the legitimate heir to Pharaoh had regained part of his power. Some years ensued of uncertainty as to who was the real ruler of Egypt.
In our recent campaign on the Upper Nile, we heard a lot about the Mudir of Dongola. His province includes part of the ancient kingdom of Ethiopia; and in Meirawi, the village that showed up in so many telegrams, we can still find Meroe, the capital of Ethiopia. Back in Isaiah's time, the king of Ethiopia was, like the Mudir of Dongola during our war, an ambitious person with quite a bit of energy; and the ruler of Egypt was, similar to the Khedive, someone with little influence or resources. As a result, a situation arose that could have happened a few years ago if the British army hadn't been in Egypt. The Ethiopian came down the Nile, defeated Pharaoh, and burned him alive. But he died, and his son died after him; and before their successor could also come down the Nile, the rightful heir to Pharaoh had regained some of his power. Years passed with uncertainty about who the true ruler of Egypt was.
[223]It was in this time of unsettlement that Judah sought Egypt's help. The ignorance of the policy was manifest to all who were not blinded by fear of Assyria or party feeling. To Isaiah the Egyptian alliance is a folly and fatality that deserve all his scorn (vv. 1-8).
[223]During this time of uncertainty, Judah turned to Egypt for help. Anyone not paralyzed by fear of Assyria or influenced by political loyalties could see how misguided this decision was. To Isaiah, the alliance with Egypt was both foolish and disastrous, and he criticized it harshly (vv. 1-8).
Woe to the rebellious children, saith the Lord, executing a policy, but it is not from Me; and weaving a web, but not of My spirit, that they may heap sin upon sin; who set themselves on the way to go down to Egypt, and at My mouth they have not inquired, to flee to the refuge of Pharaoh, and to hide themselves in the shadow of Egypt. But the refuge of Pharaoh shall be unto you for shame, and the hiding in the shadow of Egypt for confusion! How can a broken Egypt help you? When his princes are at Zoan, and his ambassadors are come to Hanes, they shall all be ashamed of a people that cannot profit them, that are not for help nor for profit, but for shame, and also for reproach.
Woe to the rebellious kids, says the Lord, making plans that don't come from Me; and creating a strategy that's not inspired by My spirit, just piling up sin after sin; they are choosing to head down to Egypt, and they haven't asked for guidance from Me, trying to escape to Pharaoh's protection and hide in Egypt's shadow. But the refuge of Pharaoh will bring you nothing but shame, and hiding in Egypt will lead to confusion! How can a broken Egypt help you? When its leaders are at Zoan, and its ambassadors have arrived at Hanes, they will all be ashamed of a people who can’t help them, who offer no support or benefit, only shame and disgrace.
Then Isaiah pictures the useless caravan which Judah has sent with tribute to Egypt, strings of asses and camels struggling through the desert, land of trouble and anguish, amid lions and serpents, and all for a people that shall not profit them (ver. 6).
Then Isaiah depicts the ineffective caravan that Judah has sent with tribute to Egypt, with lines of donkeys and camels struggling through the desert, land of trouble and anguish, among lions and snakes, all for a people that will not benefit them (ver. 6).
What tempted Judah to this profitless expenditure of time and money? Egypt had a great reputation, and was a mighty promiser. Her brilliant antiquity had given her a habit of generous promise, and dazzled other nations into trusting her. Indeed, so full were Egyptian politics of bluster and big language, that the Hebrews had a nickname for Egypt. They called her Rahab—Stormy-speech, Blusterer, Braggart. It was the term also for the crocodile, as being a monster, so that there was a picturesqueness as well as moral aptness in the name. Ay, says Isaiah, catching at the old name[224] and putting to it another which describes Egyptian helplessness and inactivity, I call her Rahab Sit-still, Braggart-that-sitteth-still, Stormy-speech Stay-at-home. Blustering and inactivity, blustering and sitting still, that is her character; for Egypt helpeth in vain and to no purpose.
What made Judah waste his time and money on this? Egypt had a strong reputation and made big promises. Its impressive history had created a pattern of grand guarantees, making other nations trust it. In fact, Egyptian politics were so full of noise and grandstanding that the Hebrews gave Egypt a nickname. They called her Rahab—Stormy-speech, Blusterer, Braggart. This name also referred to the crocodile, highlighting both its monstrous nature and moral significance. Yes, says Isaiah, picking up the old name and adding another that captures Egypt's helplessness and inactivity, I call her Rahab Sit-still, Braggart-that-sitteth-still, Stormy-speech Stay-at-home. Being boastful yet inactive, being boastful and doing nothing, that’s her character; for Egypt helps in vain and to no purpose.
Knowing how sometimes the fate of a Government is affected by a happy speech or epigram, we can understand the effect of this cry upon the politicians of Jerusalem. But that he might impress it on the popular imagination and memory as well, Isaiah wrote his epigram on a tablet, and put it in a book. We must remind ourselves here of chap. xx., and remember how it tells us that Isaiah had already some years before this endeavoured to impress the popular imagination with the folly of an Egyptian alliance, walking unfrocked and barefoot three years for a sign and a portent upon Egypt and upon Ethiopia (see p. 199).
Knowing how sometimes the fate of a government can be influenced by a memorable speech or witty remark, we can see the impact of this outcry on the politicians in Jerusalem. To make sure it stuck in the public's mind, Isaiah wrote his saying on a tablet and included it in a book. We should also remember chapter xx. and note that Isaiah had already tried some years earlier to highlight the foolishness of an alliance with Egypt by walking stripped of his robe and barefoot for three years as a sign and warning against Egypt and Ethiopia (see p. 199).
So that already Isaiah had appealed from politicians to people on this Egyptian question, just as he appealed thirty years ago from court to market-place on the question of Ephraim and Damascus.[46] It is another instance of that prophetic habit of his, on which we remarked in expounding chap. viii.; and we must again emphasize the habit, for chap. xxx. here swings round upon it. Whatever be the matter committed to him, Isaiah is not allowed to rest till he brings it home to the popular conscience; and however much he may be able to charge national disaster upon the folly of politicians or the obduracy of a king, it is the people whom he holds ultimately responsible. To Isaiah a nation's politics are not arbitrary; they are not dependent[225] on the will of kings or the management of parties. They are the natural outcome of the nation's character. What the people are, that will their politics be. If you wish to reform the politics, you must first regenerate the people; and it is no use to inveigh against a senseless policy, like this Egyptian one, unless you go farther and expose the national temper which has made it possible. A people's own morals have greater influence on their destinies than their despots or legislators. Statesmen are what the State makes them. No Government will attempt a policy for which the nation behind it has not a conscience; and for the greater number of errors committed by their rulers, the blame must be laid on the people's own want of character or intelligence.
So Isaiah had already turned from politicians to the people regarding the Egyptian issue, just like he did thirty years ago when he moved from the court to the marketplace concerning Ephraim and Damascus.[46] It's another example of his prophetic tendency, which we noted in our explanation of chapter viii.; and we need to emphasize this habit again, as chapter xxx. revolves around it. Whatever issue Isaiah faces, he can't rest until he makes it relevant to the people's conscience; and no matter how much he can blame national disasters on the foolishness of politicians or the stubbornness of a king, he ultimately holds the people responsible. For Isaiah, a nation’s politics aren't random; they're not just influenced by the will of kings or party leadership. They're a direct reflection of the nation’s character. The politics will reflect who the people are. If you want to change the politics, you first need to change the people; and it's pointless to criticize a misguided policy, like this one about Egypt, without also addressing the national mindset that made it possible. The morals of a people have a greater impact on their fate than their rulers or lawmakers do. Statesmen are a product of the State. No government will pursue a policy that the nation behind it doesn't support morally; and for most mistakes made by their leaders, the responsibility lies with the people's lack of character or understanding.
This is what Isaiah now drives home (xxx. 9 ff.). He tracks the bad politics to their source in bad religion, the Egyptian policy to its roots in the prevailing tempers of the people. The Egyptian policy was doubly stamped. It was disobedience to the word of God; it was satisfaction with falsehood. The statesmen of Judah shut their ears to God's spoken word; they allowed themselves to be duped by the Egyptian Pretence. But these, says Isaiah, are precisely the characteristics of the whole Jewish people. For it is a rebellious people, lying children, children that will not hear the revelation of the Lord. It was these national failings—the want of virtues which are the very substance of a nation: truth and reverence or obedience—that had culminated in the senseless and suicidal alliance with Egypt. Isaiah fastens on their falsehood first: Which say to the seers, Ye shall not see, and to the prophets, Ye shall not prophesy unto us right things; speak to us smooth things: prophesy deceits. No wonder such a character had been fascinated by[226] "Rahab"! It was a natural Nemesis, that a people who desired from their teachers fair speech rather than true vision should be betrayed by the confidence their statesmen placed in the Blusterer, that blustered and sat still. Truth is what this people first require, and therefore the revelation of the Lord will in the first instance be the revealing of the truth. Men who will strip pretence off the reality of things; men who will call things by their right names, as Isaiah had set himself to do; honest satirists and epigrammatists—these are the bearers of God's revelation. For it is one of the means of Divine salvation to call things by their right names, and here in God's revelation also epigrams have their place. So much for truth.
This is what Isaiah emphasizes now (xxx. 9 ff.). He traces the poor politics back to their origins in flawed religion, connecting Egyptian policies to the mindset of the people. The Egyptian approach was two-fold: it was disobedience to God's word and contentment with falsehood. The leaders of Judah turned a deaf ear to what God was saying and let themselves be misled by the Egyptian facade. But Isaiah points out that these issues are exactly what defines the entire Jewish population. For it is a rebellious people, lying children, children that will not hear the revelation of the Lord. These national shortcomings—the lack of virtues that are essential for a nation, such as truth and respect or obedience—resulted in the foolish and self-destructive alliance with Egypt. Isaiah highlights their dishonesty first: Which say to the seers, Ye shall not see, and to the prophets, Ye shall not prophesy unto us right things; speak to us smooth things: prophesy deceits. It's no surprise that such a character was captivated by [226] "Rahab"! It's only fitting that a people who sought pleasing words from their teachers instead of true insight would be betrayed by the confidence their leaders put in the Braggart, that blustered and sat still. What this people need most is truth, and therefore the revelation of the Lord will primarily reveal the truth. Men who will expose the pretense of reality; men who will name things accurately, just as Isaiah aimed to do; honest satirists and epigrammatists—these are the ones who carry God's revelation. For one of the means of Divine salvation is to call things by their correct names, and epigrams also have a place in God's revelation. So much for truth.
But reverence is truth's other self, for reverence is simply loyalty to the supremest truth. And it is against the truth that the Jews have chiefly sinned. They had shut their eyes to Egypt's real character, but that was a small sin beside this: that they turned their backs on the greatest reality of all—God Himself. Get you out of the way, they said to the prophets, turn out of the path; keep quiet in our presence about the Holy One of Israel. Isaiah's effort rises to its culmination when he seeks to restore the sense of this Reality to his people. His spirit is kindled at the words the Holy One of Israel, and to the end of chap. xxxi. leaps up in a series of brilliant and sometimes scorching descriptions of the name, the majesty and the love of God. Isaiah is not content to have used his power of revelation to unveil the political truth about Egypt. He will make God Himself visible to this people. Passionately does he proceed to enforce upon the Jews what God thinks about their own condition (vv. 12-14), then to[227] persuade them to rely upon Him alone, and wait for the working of His reasonable laws (vv. 15-18). Rising higher, he purges with pity their eyes to see God's very presence, their ears to hear His voice, their wounds to feel His touch (vv. 19-26). Then he remembers the cloud of invasion on the horizon, and bids them spell, in its uncouth masses, the articulate name of the Lord (vv. 27-33). And he closes with another series of figures by which God's wisdom, and His jealousy and His tenderness are made very bright to them (chap. xxxi.).
But reverence is truth's other half, because reverence is just loyalty to the highest truth. And it is primarily against the truth that the Jews have sinned. They had ignored Egypt's true nature, but that was a minor sin compared to this: they turned their backs on the ultimate reality—God Himself. Get out of our way, they told the prophets, get off the path; stop talking to us about the Holy One of Israel. Isaiah's mission reaches its peak when he tries to bring back the awareness of this Reality to his people. His spirit ignites with the phrase the Holy One of Israel, and throughout the rest of chap. xxxi., he bursts forth with a series of brilliant and sometimes intense descriptions of God's name, majesty, and love. Isaiah is not satisfied with using his revelation gift to expose Egypt's political truths. He aims to make God Himself visible to the people. With passion, he stresses to the Jews what God thinks about their situation (vv. 12-14), then persuades them to rely only on Him and wait for the implementation of His reasonable laws (vv. 15-18). Rising even higher, he clears their eyes with compassion so they can see God's presence, their ears to hear His voice, and their wounds to feel His touch (vv. 19-26). Then he remembers the looming threat of invasion and encourages them to recognize, in its awkward masses, the clear name of the Lord (vv. 27-33). He finishes with more vivid imagery that highlights God's wisdom, jealousy, and tenderness for them (chap. xxxi.).
These brilliant prophecies may not have been given all at the same time: each is complete in itself. They do not all mention the negotiations with Egypt, but they are all dark with the shadow of Assyria. Chap. xxx. vv. 19-26 almost seem to have been written in a time of actual siege; but vv. 27-33 represent Assyria still upon the horizon. In this, however, these passages are fitly strung together: that they equally strain to impress a blind and hardened people with the will, the majesty and the love of God their Saviour.
These brilliant prophecies might not have been given all at once; each one is complete on its own. They don’t all refer to negotiations with Egypt, but they all carry the heavy influence of Assyria. Chapter xxx, verses 19-26 almost seem to be written during a real siege, while verses 27-33 depict Assyria still looming in the distance. However, these passages are well connected in that they all aim to impress a blind and hardened people with the will, the majesty, and the love of God, their Savior.
I. The Bulging Wall (vv. 12-14).
I. The Bulging Wall (vv. 12-14).
Starting from their unwillingness to listen to the voice of the Lord in their Egyptian policy, Isaiah tells the people that if they refused to hear His word for guidance, they must now listen to it for judgement. Wherefore thus saith the Holy One of Israel: Because ye look down on this word, and trust in perverseness and crookedness, and lean thereon, therefore this iniquity shall be to you as a breach ready to fall, bulging out in a high wall, whose breaking cometh suddenly at an instant. This iniquity, of course, is the embassy to Egypt. But that, as we have seen, is only the[228] people's own evil character coming to a head; and by the breaking of the wall, we are therefore to suppose that the prophet means the collapse not only of this Egyptian policy, but of the whole estate and substance of the Jewish people. It will not be your enemy that will cause a breach in the nation, but your teeming iniquity shall cause the breach—to wit, this Egyptian folly. Judah will burst her bulwarks from the inside. You may build the strongest form of government round a people, you may buttress it with foreign alliances, but these shall simply prove occasions for the internal wickedness to break forth. Your supposed buttresses will prove real breaches; and of all your social structure there will not be left as much as will make the fragments of a single home, not a sherd big enough to carry fire from the hearth, or to hold water from the cistern.
Starting from their unwillingness to listen to the voice of the Lord in their Egyptian policies, Isaiah tells the people that if they refuse to hear His word for guidance, they must now listen to it for judgment. Therefore, this is what the Holy One of Israel says: Because you disregard this word and trust in deceit and corruption, relying on them, this sin will be like a crack in a high wall, ready to fall, whose collapse will come suddenly at any moment. This sin, of course, is the embassy to Egypt. But as we have seen, it reflects the people's own evil nature reaching a breaking point; and by the breaking of the wall, the prophet suggests the collapse not only of this Egyptian policy but of the entire state and substance of the Jewish people. It will not be your enemy causing a fracture in the nation, but your overflowing wickedness will cause the break—namely, this foolish alliance with Egypt. Judah will crumble from within. You can build the strongest government around a people, you can support it with foreign alliances, but these will only provide opportunities for internal corruption to spill out. Your supposed supports will turn into real breaks; and from all your social structure, nothing will be left that can make even the remnants of a single home, not a shard big enough to carry fire from the hearth or to hold water from the cistern.
II. Not Alliances, but Reliance (vv. 15-18).
II. Not Alliances, but Reliance (vv. 15-18).
At this point, either Isaiah was stung by the demands of the politicians for an alternative to their restless Egyptian policy which he condemned, or more likely he rose, unaided by external influence, on the prophet's native instinct to find some purely religious ground on which to base his political advice. The result is one of the grandest of all his oracles. For thus saith the Lord Jehovah, the Holy One of Israel: In returning and rest shall ye be saved; in quietness and in confidence shall be your strength; and ye would not. But ye said, No, for upon horses will we flee; wherefore ye shall flee: and upon the swift will we ride; wherefore swift shall be they that pursue you! One thousand at the rebuke of one—at the rebuke of five shall ye flee: till ye be left as a bare pole on the top of a mountain, and as a standard on an hill.[229] And therefore will the Lord wait that He may be gracious unto you, and therefore will He hold aloof that He may have mercy upon you, for a God of judgement is the Lord; blessed are all they that wait for Him. The words of this passage are their own interpretation and enforcement, all but one; and as this one is obscure in its English guise, and the passage really swings from it, we may devote a paragraph to its meaning.
At this point, either Isaiah was reacting to the politicians' demands for a different approach to their troubled Egyptian policy, which he criticized, or more likely, he independently tapped into his prophetic intuition to establish a purely religious foundation for his political guidance. The result is one of his most profound oracles. For this is what the Lord Jehovah, the Holy One of Israel, says: In returning and rest you will be saved; in quietness and trust will be your strength; but you refused. You said, No, we will flee on horses; therefore you will flee: and we will ride on swift horses; therefore those who pursue you will be swift! A thousand will fall at the rebuke of one—at the rebuke of five you shall flee: until you are left like a lonely flagpole on top of a mountain, and like a standard on a hill.[229] And therefore the Lord will wait to be gracious to you, and therefore He will stay away to have mercy on you, for the Lord is a God of justice; blessed are all who wait for Him. The words in this passage interpret and enforce themselves, except for one; and since this one is unclear in its English form, and the passage really pivots around it, we can dedicate a paragraph to its meaning.
A God of judgement is the Lord is an unfortunately ambiguous translation. We must not take judgement here in our familiar sense of the word. It is not a sudden deed of doom, but a long process of law. It means manner, method, design, order, system, the ideas, in short, which we sum up under the word "law." Just as we say of a man, He is a man of judgement, and mean thereby not that by office he is a doomster, but that by character he is a man of discernment and prudence, so simply does Isaiah say here that Jehovah is a God of judgement, and mean thereby not that He is One, whose habit is sudden and awful deeds of penalty or salvation, but, on the contrary, that, having laid down His lines according to righteousness and established His laws in wisdom, He remains in His dealings with men consistent with these.
A God of judgment is the Lord is unfortunately a vague translation. We shouldn't interpret judgment here in the way we usually understand it. It's not a sudden act of doom, but a lengthy legal process. It refers to manner, method, design, order, system, the concepts that we summarize under the term "law." Just as we say of a man, He is a man of judgment, meaning that he is not a judge by profession, but is characterized by discernment and sound judgment, so Isaiah simply states that Jehovah is a God of judgment, and means that He is not One who typically performs sudden and terrible acts of punishment or salvation, but rather that, having established His principles according to righteousness and set His laws in wisdom, He acts consistently with those principles in His dealings with humanity.
Now it is a great truth that the All-mighty and All-merciful is the All-methodical too; and no religion is complete in its creed or healthy in its influence, which does not insist equally on all these. It was just the want of this third article of faith which perverted the souls of the Jews in Isaiah's day, which (as we have seen under Chapter I.) allowed them to make their worship so mechanical and material—for how could they have been satisfied with mere forms if they had but once conceived of God as having even ordinary intelligence?—and[230] which turned their political life into such a mass of intrigue, conceit and falsehood, for how could they have dared to suppose that they would get their own way, or have been so sure of their own cleverness, if only they had had a glimpse of the perception, that God, the Ruler of the world, had also His policy regarding them? They believed He was the Mighty, they believed He was the Merciful, but because they forgot that He was the Wise and the Worker by law, their faith in His might too often turned into superstitious terror, their faith in His mercy oscillated between the sleepy satisfaction that He was an indulgent God and the fretful impatience that He was an indifferent one. Therefore Isaiah persisted from first to last in this: that God worked by law; that He had His plan for Judah, as well as these politicians; and, as we shall shortly find him reminding them when intoxicated with their own cleverness, that He also is wise (xxxi. 2). Here by the same thought he bids them be at peace, and upon the rushing tides of politics, drawing them to that or the other mad venture, to swing by this anchor: that God has His own law and time for everything. No man could bring the charge of fatalism against such a policy of quietness. For it thrilled with intelligent appreciation of the Divine method. When Isaiah said, In returning and rest shall ye be saved; in quietness and confidence shall be your strength, he did not ask his restless countrymen to yield sullenly to an infinite force or to bow in stupidity beneath the inscrutable will of an arbitrary despot, but to bring their conduct into harmony with a reasonable and gracious plan, which might be read in the historical events of the time, and was vindicated by the loftiest religious convictions. Isaiah preached no submission to fate, but reverence for an all-wise Ruler, whose[231] method was plain to every clear-sighted observer of the fortunes of the nations of the world, and whose purpose could only be love and peace to His own people (cf. p. 110).
Now, it's a significant truth that the Almighty and Merciful is also the Methodical; and no religion is complete in its beliefs or effective in its impact without emphasizing all these aspects equally. It was precisely the lack of this third principle of faith that distorted the hearts of the Jews during Isaiah's time, which (as we noted in Chapter I) allowed their worship to become so mechanical and material—because how could they have been satisfied with just rituals if they had ever considered God to have even ordinary intelligence?—and[230] which turned their political life into a tangled mess of intrigue, arrogance, and deceit; for how could they have thought they would always get their way or been so confident in their own cunning if they had ever recognized that God, the Ruler of the world, had His own plans for them? They believed He was Powerful and Merciful, but since they forgot He was Wise and worked according to law, their faith in His power too often slipped into superstitious dread, and their faith in His mercy fluctuated between a lazy satisfaction with Him being an easygoing God and anxious frustration at Him being indifferent. Therefore, Isaiah consistently emphasized from beginning to end that God operates by law; that He had a plan for Judah, just like these politicians did; and, as we will soon see him reminding them when they were caught up in their own cleverness, that He is also wise (xxxi. 2). Here, through the same idea, he encourages them to find peace, and with the chaotic waves of politics pushing them toward reckless actions, to hold onto this anchor: that God has His own law and timing for everything. No one could accuse such a calm approach of being fatalistic. For it resonated with an intelligent understanding of the Divine method. When Isaiah said, In returning and rest shall ye be saved; in quietness and confidence shall be your strength, he wasn't asking his restless compatriots to stubbornly submit to an overwhelming force or to bow foolishly beneath the mysterious will of an arbitrary tyrant, but to align their actions with a reasonable and gracious plan, which could be seen in the historical events of the time and was validated by the highest religious beliefs. Isaiah preached for no resignation to fate, but rather respect for an all-wise Ruler, whose[231] methods were clear to any clear-eyed observer of the global fortunes of nations and whose intention could only be love and peace for His people (cf. p. 110).
III. God's Table in the Midst of the Enemies (vv. 19-26).
III. God's Feast in Front of Enemies (vv. 19-26).
This patient purpose of God Isaiah now proceeds to describe in its details. Every line of his description has its loveliness, and is to be separately appreciated. There is perhaps no fairer prospect from our prophet's many windows. It is not argument nor a programme, but a series of rapid glimpses, struck out by language, which often wants logical connection, but never fails to make us see.
This patient purpose of God Isaiah now proceeds to describe in its details. Every line of his description has its beauty and should be appreciated individually. There is perhaps no more beautiful view from our prophet's many windows. It is not an argument or a plan, but a series of quick insights created by language, which often lacks logical connection but never fails to make us see.
To begin with, one thing is sure: the continuance of the national existence. Isaiah is true to his original vision—the survival of a remnant. For a people in Zion—there shall be abiding in Jerusalem. So the brief essential is flashed forth. Thou shalt surely weep no more; surely He will be gracious unto thee at the voice of thy crying; with His hearing of thee He will answer thee. Thus much of general promise had been already given. Now upon the vagueness of the Lord's delay Isaiah paints realistic details, only, however, that he may make more vivid the real presence of the Lord. The siege shall surely come, with its sorely concrete privations, but the Lord will be there, equally distinct. And though the Lord give you the bread of penury and the water of tribulation—perhaps the technical name for siege rations—yet shall not thy Teacher hide Himself any more, but thine eyes shall ever be seeing thy Teacher; and thine ears shall hear a word behind thee, saying, This is the way: walk ye in it, when ye turn to the right hand or[232] when ye turn to the left. Real, concrete sorrows, these are they that make the heavenly Teacher real! It is linguistically possible, and more in harmony with the rest of the passage, to turn teachers, as the English version has it, into the singular, and to render it by Revealer. The word is an active participle, "Moreh," from the same verb as the noun "Torah," which is constantly translated "Law" in our version, but is, in the Prophets at least, more nearly equivalent to "instruction," or to our modern term "revelation" (cf. ver. 9). Looking thus to the One Revealer, and hearkening to the One Voice, the lying and rebellious children shall at last be restored to that capacity for truth and obedience the loss of which has been their ruin. Devoted to the Holy One of Israel, they shall scatter their idols as loathsome (ver. 22). But thereupon a wonder is to happen. As the besieged people, conscious of the One Great Presence in the midst of their encompassed city, cast their idols through the gates and over the walls, a marvellous vision of space and light and fulness of fresh food bursts upon their starved and straitened souls (ver. 23). Promise more sympathetic was never uttered to a besieged and famished city. Mark that all down the passage there is no mention of the noise or instruments of battle. The prophet has not spoken of the besiegers, who they may be, how they may come, nor of the fashion of their war, but only of the effects of the siege on those within: confinement, scant and bitter rations. And now he is almost wholly silent about the breaking up of the investing army and the trail of their slaughter. No battle breaks this siege, but a vision of openness and plenty dawns noiselessly over its famine and closeness. It is not vengeance or blood that an exhausted and penitent people thirst after. But as they have been[233] caged in a fortress, narrow, dark and stony, so they thirst for the sight of the sower, and the drop of the rain on the broken, brown earth, and the juicy corn, and the meadow for their cribbed cattle, and the noise of brooks and waterfalls, and above and about it all fulness of light. And He shall give the rain of thy seed, that thou shalt sow the ground withal, and bread, even the increase of the ground, and it shall be juicy and fat; thy cattle shall feed that day in a broad meadow. And the oxen and the young asses that till the ground shall eat savoury provender, winnowed with the shovel and with the fan. And there shall be upon every lofty mountain and upon every lifted hill rivers, streams of water, in the day of the great slaughter, when the towers fall. And the light of the moon shall be as the light of the sun, and the light of the sun shall be sevenfold, as the light of seven days, in the day that the Lord bindeth up the hurt of His people and healeth the stroke of their wound. It is one of Isaiah's fairest visions, and he is very much to be blamed who forces its beauty of nature into an allegory of spiritual things. Here literally God spreads His people a table in the midst of their enemies.
To begin with, one thing is certain: the survival of the nation. Isaiah stays true to his original vision—the survival of a remnant. For a people in Zion—there will be those living in Jerusalem. So the core message is highlighted. You will surely weep no more; He will be gracious to you when you cry out; He will hear you and answer you. This general promise has already been given. Now, regarding the uncertainty of the Lord's delay, Isaiah paints realistic details, but only so he can more vividly represent the true presence of the Lord. The siege will undoubtedly come, bringing harsh and real hardships, but the Lord will be there, equally distinct. And though the Lord gives you the bread of hardship and the water of trouble—possibly the technical term for siege rations—Your Teacher will no longer hide Himself, but your eyes will see your Teacher; and your ears will hear a voice behind you, saying, This is the way: walk in it, whether you turn to the right or[232] to the left. Real, concrete sorrows are what make the heavenly Teacher real! It is linguistically possible, and more in line with the rest of the passage, to change teachers to the singular and translate it as Revealer. The term is an active participle, "Moreh," from the same verb as the noun "Torah," which is often translated as "Law" but is more accurately equated with "instruction" or the modern term "revelation" (see ver. 9). By looking to the One Revealer and listening for the One Voice, the deceitful and rebellious children will finally be restored to their ability to recognize truth and obedience—qualities that have led to their downfall. Dedicated to the Holy One of Israel, they will cast away their idols as detestable (ver. 22). But then something extraordinary will happen. As the besieged people, aware of the One Great Presence in their surrounded city, throw their idols out through the gates and over the walls, a wonderful vision of open space, light, and an abundance of fresh food will appear to their starved and constricted souls (ver. 23). A more compassionate promise has never been offered to a besieged and starving city. Notice that throughout the passage, there is no mention of the noise or instruments of war. The prophet has not referenced the besiegers, who they might be, how they might arrive, or the nature of their warfare, but focuses only on the effects of the siege on those inside: confinement and limited, harsh rations. And now he is almost entirely silent about the disbanding of the besieging army and the aftermath of their defeat. No battle ends this siege; instead, a vision of openness and plenty quietly emerges over the famine and confinement. It is not vengeance or blood that a weary and repentant people long for. They have been[233] trapped in a cramped, dark, and stony fortress, so they long for the sight of the sower, the sound of rain on the cracked, brown earth, the lush corn, the meadows for their cooped-up cattle, the sounds of streams and waterfalls, and above all, an abundance of light. And He will provide rain for your seed, so you can sow the land, and bread, the harvest of the land, which will be rich and plentiful; your cattle will graze that day in a wide meadow. And the oxen and young donkeys that work the ground will eat tasty feed, winnowed with a shovel and fork. And on every high mountain and every lifted hill, there will be rivers and streams of water, on the day of the great slaughter, when the towers fall. The moonlight will be as bright as sunlight, and the sunlight will be seven times brighter, like the light of seven days, on the day that the Lord binds up the wounds of His people and heals their injuries. It is one of Isaiah's most beautiful visions, and it is quite misguided to force its natural beauty into a metaphor for spiritual concepts. Here, literally, God sets a table for His people in the presence of their enemies.
IV. The Name of the Lord (vv. 27-33).
IV. The Name of God (vv. 27-33).
But Isaiah lays down "the oaten pipe" and lifts again a brazen trumpet to his lips. Between him and that sunny landscape of the future, of whose pastoral details he has so sweetly sung, roll up now the uncouth masses of the Assyrian invasion, not yet fully gathered, far less broken. We are back in the present again, and the whole horizon is clouded.
But Isaiah sets aside "the oaten pipe" and brings a brass trumpet to his lips. Between him and that bright landscape of the future, with its lovely pastoral details he has sung about so sweetly, the harsh waves of the Assyrian invasion rise up, not yet fully gathered, let alone defeated. We are back in the present, and the entire horizon is overcast.
The passage does not look like one from which comfort or edification can be derived, but it is of extreme interest. The first two verses, for instance,[234] only require a little analysis to open a most instructive glimpse into the prophet's inner thoughts about the Assyrian progress, and show us how they work towards the expression of its full meaning. Behold, the Name of Jehovah cometh from afar—burning His anger and awful the uplifting smoke; His lips are full of wrath, and His tongue as fire that devoureth; and His breath is as an overflowing torrent—even unto the neck it reacheth—to shake the nations in a sieve of destruction, and a bridle that leadeth astray on the jaws of the peoples.
The passage may not seem like one that brings comfort or insight, but it's really engaging. The first two verses, for example, [234] require just a bit of analysis to reveal a valuable look into the prophet's thoughts about the Assyrian advance, showing us how they contribute to conveying its full significance. Look, the Name of the Lord is coming from far away—burning with anger and smoke rising high; His lips are filled with fury, and His tongue is like fire that devours; and His breath is like a raging flood—it reaches up to the neck—to shake the nations in a sieve of destruction, and a bridle that misleads the people.
The Name of Jehovah is the phrase the prophets use when they wish to tell us of the personal presence of God. When we hear a name cried out, we understand immediately that a person is there. So when the prophet calls, Behold, the Name of Jehovah, in face of the prodigious advance of Assyria, we understand that he has caught some intuition of God's presence in that uplifting of the nations of the north at the word of the great King and their resistless sweep southward upon Palestine. In that movement God is personally present. The Divine presence Isaiah then describes in curiously mingled metaphor, which proves how gradually it was that he struggled to a knowledge of its purpose there. First of all he describes the advance of Assyria as a thunderstorm, heavy clouds and darting, devouring fire. His imagination pictures a great face of wrath. The thick curtains of cloud as they roll over one another suggest the heavy lips, and the lightnings the fiery tongue. Then the figure passes from heaven to earth. The thunderstorm has burst, and becomes the mountain torrent, which speedily reaches the necks of those who are caught in its bed. But then the prophet's conscience suggests something more than sudden and sheer force in this invasion, and the tossing[235] of the torrent naturally leads him to express this new element in the figure of a sieve. His thought about the Assyrian flood thus passes from one of simple force and rush to one of judgement and being well kept in hand. He sees its ultimate check at Jerusalem, and so his last figure of it is the figure of a bridle, or lasso, such as is thrown upon the jaws of a wild animal when you wish to catch and tame him.
The Name of Jehovah is the term the prophets use when they want to indicate God's personal presence. When we hear someone calling a name, we immediately know that person is there. So when the prophet says, Behold, the Name of Jehovah, in light of the incredible advance of Assyria, we realize he has sensed God's presence in the emergence of the northern nations at the command of the great King and their unstoppable march southward into Palestine. In that movement, God is actively present. Isaiah then describes this Divine presence with mixed metaphors, showing how slowly he came to understand its purpose. First, he portrays the advance of Assyria as a thunderstorm, with dark clouds and striking, consuming fire. His imagination depicts a gigantic face of anger. The thick clouds rolling over each other suggest heavy lips, and the lightning represents a fiery tongue. Then the imagery shifts from the sky to the ground. The thunderstorm has erupted and turns into a mountain torrent, quickly reaching the necks of those caught in its path. However, the prophet's conscience hints at something more than just sudden and overwhelming force in this invasion, and the tossing[235] of the torrent naturally leads him to express this new aspect with the image of a sieve. His perspective on the Assyrian flood shifts from one of pure force and rush to one of judgment and control. He envisions its ultimate halt at Jerusalem, and so his final image is that of a bridle or lasso, like what you throw onto the jaws of a wild animal when you want to catch and tame it.
This gradual progress from the sense of sheer wild force, through that of personal wrath, to discipline and sparing is very interesting. Vague and chaotic that disaster rolled up the horizon upon Judah. It cometh from afar. The politicians fled from it to their refuge behind the Egyptian Pretence. But Isaiah bids them face it. The longer they look, the more will conscience tell them that the unavoidable wrath of God is in it; no blustering Rahab will be able to hide them from the anger of the Face that lowers there. But let them look longer still, and the unrelieved features of destruction will change to a hand that sifts and checks, the torrent will become a sieve, and the disaster show itself well held in by the power of their own God.
This gradual shift from a feeling of pure wild force, through personal anger, to discipline and restraint is really interesting. Vague and chaotic, that disaster rolled over the horizon toward Judah. It comes from afar. The politicians ran from it, seeking refuge behind a facade of Egypt. But Isaiah urges them to confront it. The longer they look, the more their conscience will tell them that the unavoidable wrath of God is present; no blustering Rahab will be able to shield them from the anger of the looming presence. But if they look even longer, the stark features of destruction will transform into a hand that sorts and controls, the torrent will become a sieve, and the disaster will reveal itself as being firmly held by the power of their own God.
So wildly and impersonally still do the storms of sorrow and disaster roll up the horizon on men's eyes, and we fly in vague terror from them to our Egyptian refuges. So still does conscience tell us it is futile to flee from the anger of God, and we crouch hopeless beneath the rush of imaginations of unchecked wrath, blackening the heavens and turning every path of life to a tossing torrent. May it then be granted us to have some prophet at our side to bid us face our disaster once more, and see the discipline and judgement of the Lord, the tossing only of His careful sieve, in the wild and cruel waves! We may not be poets like[236] Isaiah nor able to put the processes of our faith into such splendid metaphors as he, but faith is given us to follow the same course as his thoughts did, and to struggle till she arrives at the consciousness of God in the most uncouth judgements that darken her horizon—the consciousness of God present not only to smite, but to sift, and in the end to spare.
So wildly and impersonally do the storms of sorrow and disaster loom on the horizon of our eyes, and we flee in vague terror to our safe havens. Conscience still tells us it's pointless to run from God's anger, and we huddle hopelessly beneath the onslaught of our unchecked fears, darkening the skies and turning every path of life into a turbulent torrent. May we then be blessed with a prophet by our side to urge us to confront our disaster once more, to see the discipline and judgment of the Lord, the chaos only a careful sifting in the wild and cruel waves! We may not be poets like[236]Isaiah, nor can we express the processes of our faith in such beautiful metaphors, but we are given faith to follow the same path as his thoughts and to struggle until we become aware of God through the harsh judgments that cloud our view—the awareness of God present not just to punish, but to sift, and ultimately to spare.
Of the angel who led Israel to the land of promise, God said, My Name is in him. Our faith is not perfect till we can, like Isaiah, feel the same of the blackest angel, the heaviest disaster, God can send us, and be able to spell it out articulately: The Lord, the Lord, a God merciful and gracious, long-suffering and abundant in goodness and truth.
Of the angel who guided Israel to the promised land, God said, My Name is in him. Our faith isn’t complete until we can, like Isaiah, see the truth in the darkest angel, the heaviest disaster, God might send us, and clearly articulate it: The Sir, the Lord, a God merciful and gracious, patient and overflowing with goodness and truth.
For delivery, says Isaiah, shall come to the people of God in the crisis, as sudden and as startling into song as the delivery from Egypt was. Ye shall have a song as in the night when a holy feast is kept, and gladness of heart, as when one goeth with a pipe to come into the mountain of the Lord, to the Rock of Israel.
For deliverance, Isaiah says, will come to God's people in their time of crisis, as suddenly and surprisingly as the deliverance from Egypt. You will have a song like on a night when a holy feast is celebrated, and joy in your heart, like when someone goes with a flute to approach the mountain of the Lord, to the Rock of Israel.
After this interval of solemn gladness, the storm and fire break out afresh, and rage again through the passage. But their direction is reversed, and whereas they had been shown rolling up the horizon as towards Judah, they are now shown rolling down the horizon in pursuit of the baffled Assyrian. The music of the verses is crashing. And the Lord shall cause the peal[47] of His voice to be heard, and the lighting down of His arm to be seen in the fury of anger, yea flame of devouring fire—bursting and torrent and hailstones. For from the voice of the Lord shall the Assyrian be scattered when He shall smite with the rod. And every passage of the rod of fate which the Lord bringeth down upon him shall be with[237] tabrets and harps, and in battles of waving shall he be fought against. The meaning is obscure, but palpable. Probably the verse describes the ritual of the sacrifice to Moloch, to which there is no doubt the next verse alludes. To sympathize with the prophet's figure, we need of course an amount of information about the details of that ritual which we are very far from possessing. But Isaiah's meaning is evidently this. The destruction of the Assyrian host will be liker a holocaust than a battle, like one of those fatal sacrifices to Moloch which are directed by the solemn waving of a staff, and accompanied by the music, not of war, but of festival. Battles of waving is a very obscure phrase, but the word translated waving is the technical term for the waving of the victim before the sacrifice to signify its dedication to the deity; "and these battles of waving may perhaps have taken place in the fashion in which single victims were thrown from one spear to another till death ensued."[48] At all events, it is evident that Isaiah means to suggest that the Assyrian dispersion is a religious act, a solemn holocaust rather than one of this earth's ordinary battles, and directed by Jehovah Himself from heaven. This becomes clear enough in the next verse: For a Topheth hath been set in order beforehand; yea, for Moloch is it arranged; He hath made it deep and broad; the pile thereof is fire and much wood; the breath of the Lord, like a torrent of brimstone, shall kindle it. So the Assyrian power was in the end to go up in flame.
After this period of solemn joy, the storm and fire erupt again, raging through the passage once more. However, their direction has changed; instead of rolling up the horizon toward Judah, they are now rolling down the horizon in pursuit of the defeated Assyrian. The rhythm of the verses is intense. And the Lord will make His voice heard, and the sight of His arm will be visible in the fury of His anger, yes, like a consuming fire—bursting forth with torrents and hailstones. For the Assyrian will be scattered by the voice of the Lord when He strikes with the rod. Each stroke of fate that the Lord delivers upon him will be accompanied by[237] tambourines and harps, and he will be fought against in battles of waving. The meaning is unclear, yet evident. Likely, the verse refers to the ritual sacrifice to Moloch, which the next verse definitely hints at. To truly understand the prophet's imagery, we need detailed knowledge about that ritual, which we lack. But Isaiah's message is clear: the destruction of the Assyrian forces will resemble a holocaust more than a battle, akin to one of those deadly sacrifices to Moloch, directed by the solemn waving of a staff and accompanied by festival music rather than the sounds of war. Battles of waving is a very vague term, but the word translated waving is a technical term for the waving of the victim before the sacrifice to signify its dedication to the deity; "and these battles of waving may have possibly occurred in the way single victims were passed from one spear to another until death followed."[48] In any case, it is clear that Isaiah intends to imply that the scattering of the Assyrians is a religious act, a solemn holocaust rather than one of the ordinary battles of this world, directed by Jehovah Himself from heaven. This becomes evident in the next verse: For a Topheth has been prepared beforehand; yes, for Moloch it is arranged; He has made it deep and wide; its firewood is plentiful; the breath of the Lords, like a torrent of brimstone, will ignite it. Thus, the Assyrian power was destined to end in flames.
We postpone remarks on Isaiah's sense of the fierceness of the Divine righteousness till we reach his even finer expression of it in chap. xxxiii.
We’ll hold off on discussing Isaiah's view of the intensity of Divine righteousness until we get to his even better expression of it in chapter 33.
CHAPTER XIV.
THREE TRUTHS ABOUT GOD.
Isaiah xxxi. (ABOUT 702 B.C.).
Isaiah xxxi. (702 B.C.)
Chap. xxxi., which forms an appendage to chaps. xxix. and xxx., can scarcely be reckoned among the more important prophecies of Isaiah. It is a repetition of the principles which the prophet has already proclaimed in connection with the faithless intrigues of Judah for an alliance with Egypt, and it was published at a time when the statesmen of Judah were further involved in these intrigues, when events were moving faster, and the prophet had to speak with more hurried words. Truths now familiar to us are expressed in less powerful language. But the chapter has its own value; it is remarkable for three very unusual descriptions of God, which govern the following exposition of it. They rise in climax, enforcing three truths:—that in the government of life we must take into account God's wisdom; we must be prepared to find many of His providences grim and savage-looking; but we must also believe that He is most tender and jealous for His people.
Chap. xxxi., which is an addition to chaps. xxix. and xxx., can hardly be considered one of the more significant prophecies of Isaiah. It simply restates the principles that the prophet has already declared regarding Judah's untrustworthy attempts to form an alliance with Egypt, and it was issued at a time when Judah's leaders were even deeper into these schemes, when events were unfolding rapidly, and the prophet had to convey his message with greater urgency. The truths that are now familiar are stated in less impactful language. However, the chapter holds its own significance; it is notable for three very unique descriptions of God that shape the subsequent discussion. They build on each other, emphasizing three truths: that in navigating life, we need to consider God's wisdom; we should be ready to encounter many of His actions that appear harsh and violent; but we must also trust that He is deeply caring and protective of His people.
I. Yet He also is Wise (vv. 1-3).
I. But He is also smart (vv. 1-3).
We must suppose the negotiations with Egypt to have taken for the moment a favourable turn, and the[239] statesmen who advocated them to be congratulating themselves upon some consequent addition to the fighting strength of Judah. They could point to many chariots and a strong body of cavalry in proof of their own wisdom and refutation of the prophet's maxim, In quietness and in confidence shall be your strength; in returning and rest shall ye be saved.
We have to assume that the negotiations with Egypt have taken a positive turn for now, and the[239] politicians supporting this are likely congratulating themselves on an increase in Judah's military strength. They could highlight the many chariots and a solid cavalry as proof of their own judgment, countering the prophet's saying, Your strength will be in calmness and trust; in returning and resting, you will be saved.
Isaiah simply answers their self-congratulation with the utterance of a new Woe, and it is in this that the first of the three extraordinary descriptions of God is placed. Woe unto them that go down to Egypt for help; upon horses do they stay, and trust in chariots because they are many, and in horsemen because they are very strong: but they look not unto the Holy One of Israel, and Jehovah they do not seek. Yet He also is wise. You have been clever and successful, but have you forgotten that God also is wise, that He too has His policy, and acts reasonably and consistently? You think you have been making history; but God also works in history, and surely, to put it on the lowest ground, with as much cleverness and persistence as you do. Yet He also is wise, and will bring evil, and will not call back His words, but will arise against the house of the evil-doers, and against the help of them that work iniquity.
Isaiah responds to their self-satisfaction with a new Woe, and this introduces the first of three remarkable descriptions of God. Woe to those who go to Egypt for help; they rely on horses, trust in chariots because they're many, and in horsemen because they're very strong: but they do not look to the Holy One of Israel, and they do not seek Jehovah. Yet He is also wise. You’ve been smart and successful, but have you forgotten that God is also wise, that He too has His own plans, and acts rationally and consistently? You think you’re making history; but God is also at work in history, and certainly, at least as cleverly and persistently as you are. Yet He is also wise, and will bring disaster, and will not take back His words, but will rise against the house of evildoers, and against the help of those who commit iniquity.
This satire was the shaft best fitted to pierce the folly of the rulers of Judah. Wisdom, a reasonable plan for their aims and prudence in carrying it out, was the last thing they thought of associating with God, whom they relegated to what they called their religion—their temples, worship and poetry. When their emotions were stirred by solemn services, or under great disaster, or in the hour of death, they remembered God and it seemed natural to them[240] that in these great exceptions of life He should interfere; but in their politics and their trade, in the common course and conduct of life, they ignored Him and put their trust in their own wisdom. They limited God to the ceremonies and exceptional occasions of life, when they looked for His glory or miraculous assistance, but they never thought that in their ordinary ways He had any interest or design.
This satire was the perfect way to highlight the foolishness of the rulers of Judah. Wisdom—a sensible approach to their goals and careful execution—was the last thing they connected to God, whom they pushed to the side in what they called their religion—their temples, worship, and poetry. When they felt strong emotions during solemn services, experienced major disasters, or faced death, they remembered God, and it seemed natural to them that He should step in during these critical moments of life; however, in their politics and trade, in their everyday lives, they ignored Him and relied on their own understanding. They restricted God to rituals and exceptional circumstances, expecting His presence or miraculous help then, but never considered that He had any interest or plans in their daily actions.
The forgetfulness, against which Isaiah directs this shaft of satire, is the besetting sin of very religious people, of very successful people, and of very clever people.
The forgetfulness that Isaiah targets with this sharp satire is a common flaw among highly religious people, very successful individuals, and exceptionally smart people.
It is the temptation of an ordinary Christian, church-going people, like ourselves, with a religion so full of marvellous mercies, and so blessed with regular opportunities of worship, to think of God only in connection with these, and practically to ignore that along the far greater stretches of life He has any interest or purpose regarding us. Formally-religious people treat God as if He were simply a constitutional sovereign, to step in at emergencies, and for the rest to play a nominal and ceremonial part in the conduct of their lives. Ignoring the Divine wisdom and ceaseless providence of God, and couching their hearts upon easy views of His benevolence, they have no other thought of Him, than as a philanthropic magician, whose power is reserved to extricate men when they have got past helping themselves. From the earliest times that way of regarding God has been prevalent, and religious teachers have never failed to stigmatize it with the hardest name for folly. Fools, says the Psalmist, are afflicted when they draw near unto the gates of death; then, only then, do they cry unto the Lord in their trouble.[241] Thou fool! says Christ of the man who kept God out of the account of his life. God is not mocked, although we ignore half His being and confine our religion to such facile views of His nature. With this sarcasm, Isaiah reminds us that it is not a Fool who is on the throne of the universe; yet is the Being whom the imaginations of some men place there any better? O wise men, God also is wise. Not by fits and starts of a benevolence similar to that of our own foolish and inconsistent hearts does He work. Consistency, reason and law are the methods of His action; and they apply closely, irretrievably, to all of our life. Hath He promised evil? Then evil will proceed. Let us believe that God keeps His word; that He is thoroughly attentive to all we do; that His will concerns the whole of our life.
It’s easy for everyday Christians, like us—who attend church and have a faith filled with amazing blessings and regular chances to worship—to think of God only in relation to these aspects, and to forget that throughout the much bigger parts of life, He has an interest and purpose for us. Many religious people treat God as if He were merely a ceremonial leader, stepping in during emergencies while playing a minimal role in their daily lives. By overlooking God’s wisdom and ongoing care, and holding onto simplistic views of His kindness, they only see Him as a helpful magician, ready to rescue them once they’ve gotten into trouble beyond their own ability to solve. This perspective has been common since ancient times, and religious leaders have often criticized it as foolishness. The Psalmist says, “Fools are troubled when they approach the gates of death; it’s only then that they cry out to the Lord in their distress.” [241] Jesus called the man who excluded God from his life a fool. God isn’t fooled, even when we ignore parts of His nature and limit our faith to simplistic views. Isaiah reminds us with sarcasm that it’s not a fool who rules the universe; yet, is the being some people envision up there any better? Oh wise men, “God is also wise.” He doesn’t act with bursts of kindness like our own inconsistent hearts. Instead, He works with consistency, reason, and law, principles that apply closely and unavoidably to every aspect of our lives. If He has promised harm, then harm will come. Let’s believe that God keeps His promises; that He is fully aware of everything we do; that His will pertains to all of our lives.
But the temptation to refuse to God even ordinary wisdom is also the temptation of very successful and very clever people, such as these Jewish politicians fancied themselves to be, or such as the Rich Fool in the parable. They have overcome all they have matched themselves against, and feel as if they were to be masters of their own future. Now the Bible and the testimony of men invariably declare that God has one way of meeting such fools—the way Isaiah suggests here. God meets them with their own weapons; He outmatches them in their own fashion. In the eighteenth Psalm it is written, With the pure Thou wilt show Thyself pure, and with the perverse Thou wilt show Thyself froward. The Rich Fool congratulates himself that his soul is his own; says God, This night thy soul shall be required of thee. The Jewish politicians pride themselves on their wisdom; Yet God also is wise, says Isaiah significantly.[242] After Moscow Napoleon is reported to have exclaimed, "The Almighty is too strong for me." But perhaps the most striking analogy to this satire of Isaiah is to be found in the "Confessions" of that Jew, from whose living sepulchre we are so often startled with weird echoes of the laughter of the ancient prophets of his race. When Heine, Germany's greatest satirist, lay upon a bed to which his evil living had brought him before his time, and the pride of art, which had been, as he says, his god, was at last crushed, he tells us what it was that crushed him. They were singing his songs in every street of his native land, and his fame had gone out through the world, while he lay an exile and paralysed upon his "mattress-grave." "Alas!" he cries, "the irony of Heaven weighs heavily upon me. The great Author of the universe, the celestial Aristophanes, wished to show me, the petty, earthly, German Aristophanes, how my most trenchant satires are only clumsy patchwork compared with His, and how immeasurably He excels me in humour and colossal wit." That is just a soul writing in its own heart's blood this terrible warning of Isaiah: Yet God also is wise.
But the temptation to deny God even basic wisdom is also something very successful and clever people face, like the Jewish politicians who thought so highly of themselves, or like the Rich Fool in the parable. They’ve conquered everything they’ve faced and feel like they can control their own destiny. The Bible and the experiences of others always say that God has one way of dealing with such fools—the way Isaiah mentions here. God counters them with their own tactics; He surpasses them in their own game. In the eighteenth Psalm, it says, With the pure Thou wilt show Thyself pure, and with the perverse Thou wilt show Thyself froward. The Rich Fool praises himself for owning his soul; but God responds, This night thy soul shall be required of thee. The Jewish politicians take pride in their wisdom; Yet God also is wise, says Isaiah importantly.[242] After Moscow, it’s said Napoleon exclaimed, "The Almighty is too strong for me." But perhaps the most striking comparison to Isaiah's satire is found in the "Confessions" of that Jewish writer who often surprises us with echoes of the ancient prophets' laughter. When Heine, Germany’s greatest satirist, lay on a bed, brought low by his reckless living before his time, and the pride of art, which he described as his god, was finally crushed, he reveals what did that to him. His songs were being sung in every street of his homeland, and his fame had spread worldwide, while he lay an exile and paralyzed on his “mattress-grave.” “Alas!” he cries, “the irony of Heaven bears down on me. The great Author of the universe, the celestial Aristophanes, wanted to show me, the small, earthly, German Aristophanes, how my sharpest satires are just clumsy patchwork compared to His, and how infinitely He surpasses me in humor and colossal wit.” That is just a soul writing in its own heart's blood this terrible warning of Isaiah: Yet God also is wise.
Yea, the Egyptians are men, and not God, and their horses flesh, and not spirit; and when Jehovah shall stretch out His hand, both he that helpeth shall stumble, and he that is holpen shall fall, and they all shall perish together.
Yes, the Egyptians are just people, not God, and their horses are just animals, not spirits; and when the Lord reaches out His hand, both the one who helps and the one who is helped will stumble and fall, and they will all be destroyed together.
II. The Lion and his Prey (ver. 4).
II. The Lion and His Prey (ver. 4).
But notwithstanding what he has said about God destroying men who trust in their own cleverness, Isaiah goes on to assert that God is always ready to save what is worth saving. The people, the city, His own city—God will save that. To express God's persistent grace[243] towards Jerusalem, Isaiah uses two figures borrowed from the beasts. Both of them are truly Homeric, and fire the imagination at once; but the first is not one we should have expected to find as a figure of the saving grace of God. Yet Isaiah knows it is not enough for men to remember how wise God always is. They need also to be reminded how grim and cruel He must sometimes appear, even in His saving providences.
But despite what he said about God destroying people who rely on their own cleverness, Isaiah continues to affirm that God is always ready to save what is worth saving. The people, the city, His own city—God will rescue that. To illustrate God's constant grace[243] toward Jerusalem, Isaiah uses two examples from animals. Both are quite impressive and capture the imagination right away, but the first is not one we would typically expect to symbolize God's saving grace. Still, Isaiah understands that it's not enough for people to remember just how wise God always is. They also need to be reminded of how harsh and cruel He can sometimes seem, even in His acts of salvation.
For thus saith Jehovah unto me: Like as when the lion growleth, and the young lion over his prey, if a mob of shepherds be called forth against him, from their voice he will not shrink in dismay, nor for their noise abase himself; so shall Jehovah of hosts come down to fight for Mount Zion and the hill thereof. A lion with a lamb in his claws, growling over it, while a crowd of shepherds come up against him; afraid to go near enough to kill him, they try to frighten him away by shouting at him. But he holds his prey unshrinking.
For this is what the Lord says to me: Just like when a lion roars, and a young lion over its kill, if a group of shepherds is summoned against him, he won't back down in fear at their voices, nor will he lower himself because of their noise; that’s how the Lord of hosts will come down to fight for Mount Zion and its hill. A lion with a lamb in its claws, growling over it, while a crowd of shepherds approaches; afraid to get close enough to kill him, they try to scare him away by shouting at him. But he holds onto his prey without fear.
It is a figure that startles at first. To liken God with a saving hold upon His own to a wild lion with his claws in the prey! But horror plays the part of a good emphasis; while if we look into the figure, we shall feel our horror change to appreciation. There is something majestic in that picture of the lion with the shouting shepherds, too afraid to strike him. He will not be dismayed at their voice, nor abase himself for the noise of them. Is it, after all, an unworthy figure of the Divine Claimant for this city, who kept unceasing hold upon her after His own manner, mysterious and lionlike to men, undisturbed by the screams, formulas, and prayers of her mob of politicians and treaty-mongers? For these are the shepherds Isaiah means—sham shepherds, the shrieking crew of politicians,[244] with their treaties and military display. God will save and carry Jerusalem His own way, paying no heed to such. He will not be dismayed at their voice, nor abase Himself for the noise of them.
It’s a striking image at first. Comparing God’s protective grip on His own to a wild lion with its claws in its prey seems shocking! But the horror serves as a strong emphasis; when we really think about the image, we start to feel our horror turn into appreciation. There’s something majestic about that picture of the lion with the shouting shepherds, who are too scared to confront it. He will not be intimidated by their voices, nor will He lower Himself because of their noise. Is it really an unworthy image of the Divine Ruler for this city, who holds on to her in His own way, mysterious and lion-like to people, unaffected by the screams, rituals, and prayers of the crowd of politicians and treaty-makers? These are the shepherds Isaiah is talking about—false shepherds, the loud group of politicians,[244] with their treaties and military shows. God will protect and guide Jerusalem His own way, ignoring them. He will not be intimidated by their voices, nor will He lower Himself because of their noise.
There is more than the unyielding persistency of Divine grace taught here. There is that to begin with. God will never let go what He has made His own: the souls He has redeemed from sin, the societies He has redeemed from barbarism, the characters He has hold of, the lives He has laid His hand upon. Persistency of saving grace—let us learn that confidently in the parable. But that is only half of what it is meant to teach. Look at the shepherds: shepherds shouting round a lion; why does Isaiah put it that way, and not as David did—lions growling round a brave shepherd, with the lamb in his arms? Because it so appeared then in the life Isaiah was picturing, because it often looks the same in real life still. These politicians—they seemed, they played the part of, shepherds; and Jehovah, who persistently frustrated their plans for the salvation of the State—He looked the lion, delivering Jerusalem to destruction. And very often to men does this arrangement of the parts repeat itself; and while human friends are anxious and energetic about them, God Himself appears in providences more lionlike than shepherdly. He grasps with the savage paw of death some one as dear to us as that city was to Isaiah. He rends our body or soul or estate. And friends and our own thoughts gather round the cruel bereavement or disaster with remonstrance and complaint. Our hearts cry out, doing, like shepherds, their best to scare by prayer and cries the foe they are too weak to kill. We all know the scene, and how shabby and mean that mob of human remonstrances looks in face of[245] the great Foe, majestic though inarticulate, that with sullen persistence carries off its prey. All we can say in such times is that if it is God who is the lion, then it is for the best. For though He slay me, yet will I trust Him; and, after all, it is safer to rely on the mercies of God, lionlike though they be, than on the weak benevolences and officious pities of the best of human advisers. "Thy will be done"—let perfect reverence teach us to feel that, even when providence seems as savage as men that day thought God's will towards Jerusalem.
There’s more than just the unwavering persistence of divine grace being taught here. That’s important, for sure. God will never abandon what He has claimed as His own: the souls He has saved from sin, the communities He has rescued from chaos, the people He holds dear, the lives He has touched. The persistence of saving grace—let’s embrace that confidently in this parable. But that’s only part of the lesson. Look at the shepherds: shepherds crying out around a lion; why does Isaiah choose to describe it like that, rather than how David did—lions snarling around a brave shepherd holding a lamb? Because that’s how it seemed in the life Isaiah was portraying, and it often looks the same in real life today. These politicians—they appeared to be shepherds; and Jehovah, who continually thwarted their plans for saving the State—He showed up as the lion, allowing Jerusalem to fall to ruin. This scenario often repeats itself; while human friends are anxious and proactive about the situation, God sometimes appears in ways that seem more lion-like than shepherd-like. He grabs someone dear to us with the brutal claw of death, just like that city was to Isaiah. He tears apart our body, soul, or finances. Friends and our own minds gather around the painful loss or disaster with protests and complaints. Our hearts cry out, doing their best, like shepherds, to scare off the enemy they’re too weak to overcome with prayers and screams. We all recognize that scene, and how pathetic and insignificant our human protests appear in the face of[245] the great Enemy, grand yet silent, who relentlessly takes its toll. All we can say in those moments is that if God is the lion, then it’s for our good. For though He slay me, yet will I trust Him; and ultimately, it’s safer to trust in the mercies of God, even if they come in a lion-like form, than in the feeble kindness and eager sympathies of the best human advisors. "Thy will be done"—let perfect reverence teach us to feel that, even when it seems like providence is as brutal as people believed God’s will was towards Jerusalem that day.
In addition then to remembering, when men seem by their cleverness and success to rule life, that God is wiser and His plans more powerful than theirs, we are not to forget, when men seem more anxious and merciful than His dark providence, that for all their argument and action His will shall not alter. But now we are to hear that this will, so hard and mysterious, is as merciful and tender as a mother's.
In addition to remembering that when people appear to govern life with their cleverness and success, God is wiser and His plans are stronger than theirs, we shouldn't forget that when people seem more anxious and compassionate than His seemingly harsh will, His intentions will not change despite their arguments and actions. But now we are to understand that this will, which seems so difficult and mysterious, is as caring and gentle as a mother's.
III. The Mother-bird and her Nest (ver. 5).
III. The mother bird and her nest (ver. 5).
As birds hovering, so will Jehovah of hosts cover Jerusalem, He will cover and deliver it: He will pass over and preserve it. At last we are through dark providence, to the very heart of the Almighty. The meaning is familiar from its natural simplicity and frequent use in Scripture. Two features of it our version has not reproduced. The word birds means the smaller kind of feathered creatures, and the word hovering is feminine in the original: As little mother-birds hovering, so will Jehovah of hosts protect Jerusalem. We have been watching in spring the hedge where we know is a nest. Suddenly the mother-bird, who has been sitting on a branch close by, flutters off her perch, passes backwards and forwards, with flapping wings[246] that droop nervously towards the nest over her young. A hawk is in the sky, and till he disappears she will hover—the incarnation of motherly anxiety. This is Isaiah's figure. His native city, on which he poured so much of his heart in lyrics and parables, was again in danger. Sennacherib was descending upon her; and the pity of Isaiah's own heart for her, evil though she was, suggested to him a motherhood of pity in the breast of God. The suggestion God Himself approved. Centuries after, when He assumed our flesh and spoke our language, when He put His love into parables lowly and familiar to our affections, there were none of them more beautiful than that which He uttered of this same city, weeping as He spake: O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, how often would I have gathered thy children together, as a hen gathereth her brood under her wings, and ye would not!
Just like little birds hovering, so will the Lord of hosts protect Jerusalem; He will cover and rescue it: He will pass over and keep it safe. Finally, we’ve reached the core of the Almighty after navigating through dark times. The meaning is clear due to its natural simplicity and frequent mention in Scripture. Our version misses two aspects. The word birds refers to the smaller kinds of birds, and the term hovering is feminine in the original: As little mother-birds hovering, so will the Lord of hosts protect Jerusalem. We’ve observed in spring the bushes where we know a nest is located. Suddenly, the mother-bird, who has been sitting on a nearby branch, flutters off her perch, moving back and forth with her wings[246] drooping anxiously over her young. A hawk is in the sky, and until he leaves, she will hover—an embodiment of maternal worry. This is Isaiah's imagery. His beloved city, to which he devoted so much of his heart in songs and parables, was once again in danger. Sennacherib was descending upon her; and the compassion in Isaiah's heart for her, despite her wrongdoings, inspired him to envision a motherly concern in God. God Himself affirmed this idea. Centuries later, when He took on human form and spoke our language, expressing His love through simple and relatable parables, none were more beautiful than the one He spoke about this same city, weeping as He said: O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, how often would I have gathered your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you would not!
With such fountains in Scripture, we need not, as some have done, exalt the Virgin, or virtually make a fourth person in the Godhead, and that a woman, in order to satisfy those natural longings of the heart which the widespread worship of the mother of Jesus tells us are so peremptory. For all fulness dwelleth in God Himself. Not only may we rejoice in that pity and wise provision for our wants, in that pardon and generosity, which we associate with the name of father, but also in the wakefulness, the patience, the love, lovelier with fear, which make a mother's heart so dear and indispensable. We cannot tell along what wakened nerve the grace of God may reach our hearts; but Scripture has a medicine for every pain. And if any feel their weakness as little children feel it, let them know that the Spirit of God broods over them, as a mother over her babe; and if any are in pain or anxiety,[247] and there is no human heart to suffer with them, let them know that as closely as a mother may come to suffer with her child, and as sensitive as she is to its danger, so sensitive is God Almighty to theirs, and that He gives them proof of their preciousness to Him by suffering with them.
With such sources in Scripture, we don’t need to, like some have done, elevate the Virgin or effectively create a fourth person in the Godhead who is a woman to meet the natural longings of the heart that the widespread worship of Jesus’ mother shows us are so pressing. For all fullness resides in God Himself. We can rejoice not only in the compassion and wise provision for our needs, along with the forgiveness and generosity we associate with the name of father, but also in the attentiveness, patience, and love—made even more beautiful by fear—that make a mother’s heart so precious and essential. We can’t know exactly how God’s grace may awaken our hearts, but Scripture has a remedy for every pain. If anyone feels their weakness like little children do, let them know that the Spirit of God watches over them, just as a mother does over her baby; and if anyone is in pain or anxiety, [247] and there’s no human heart to share their suffering, let them understand that just as a mother comes close to suffer with her child and is so sensitive to its danger, God Almighty is equally sensitive to theirs, and He shows them how precious they are to Him by sharing in their suffering.
How these three descriptions meet the three failings of our faith! We forget that God is ceaselessly at work in wisdom in our lives. We forget that God must sometimes, even when He is saving us, seem lionlike and cruel. We forget that "the heart of the Eternal is most wonderfully kind."
How these three descriptions address the three shortcomings of our faith! We forget that God is constantly working with wisdom in our lives. We forget that God can sometimes, even while saving us, appear fierce and unfeeling. We forget that "the heart of the Eternal is incredibly kind."
Having thus made vivid the presence of their Lord to the purged eyes of His people, patient, powerful in order, wise in counsel, persistent in grace, and, last of all, very tender, Isaiah concludes with a cry to the people to turn to this Lord, from whom they have so deeply revolted. Let them cast away their idols, and there shall be no fear of the result of the Assyrian invasion. The Assyrian shall fall, not by the sword of man, but the immediate stroke of God. And his rock shall pass away by reason of terror, and his princes shall be dismayed at the ensign, saith the Lord, whose fire is in Zion, and His furnace in Jerusalem. And so Isaiah closes this series of prophecies on the keynote with which it opened in the first verse of chap. xxix.: that Jerusalem is Ariel—the hearth and altar, the dwelling-place and sanctuary, of God.
Having vividly communicated the presence of their Lord to the purified eyes of His people—patient, powerful in order, wise in counsel, persistent in grace, and, finally, very tender—Isaiah ends with a plea for the people to turn back to this Lord, from whom they have strayed so far. They should let go of their idols, and there will be no fear of the Assyrian invasion’s outcome. The Assyrian will fall, not by human sword, but by the direct intervention of God. And his rock will be swept away by terror, and his leaders will be terrified at the banner, says the Lord, whose fire is in Zion, and His furnace in Jerusalem. Thus, Isaiah wraps up this series of prophecies echoing the message with which it began in the first verse of chap. xxix.: that Jerusalem is Ariel—the hearth and altar, the dwelling-place and sanctuary, of God.
CHAPTER XV.
A MAN: CHARACTER AND THE CAPACITY TO DISCRIMINATE CHARACTER.
Isaiah xxxii. 1-8 (ABOUT 702 B.C.?).
Isaiah xxxii. 1-8 (ABOUT 702 B.C.?).
The Assyrians being thus disposed of, Isaiah turns to a prospect, on which we have scarcely heard him speak these twenty years, since Assyria appeared on the frontier of Judah—the religious future and social progress of his own people. This he paints in a small prophecy of eight verses, the first eight of chap. xxxii.—verses 9-20 of that chapter apparently springing from somewhat different conditions.
The Assyrians dealt with, Isaiah now reflects on a topic he has barely mentioned in the past twenty years, since Assyria showed up at the border of Judah—the spiritual future and social development of his own people. He captures this in a brief prophecy of eight verses, the first eight of chap. xxxii.—verses 9-20 of that chapter seem to arise from slightly different circumstances.
The first eight verses of chap. xxxii. belong to a class of prophecies which we may call Isaiah's "escapes." Like St. Paul, Isaiah, when he has finished some exposition of God's dealings with His people or argument with the sinners among them, bursts upon an unencumbered vision of the future, and with roused conscience, and voice resonant from long debate, takes his loftiest flights of eloquence. In Isaiah's book we have several of these visions, and each bears a character of its own according to the sort of sinners from whom the prophet shook himself loose to describe it and the kind of indignation that filled his heart at the time. We have already seen, how in some of Isaiah's visions the Messiah has the chief place, while[249] from others He is altogether absent. But here we come upon another inconsistency. Sometimes, as in chap. xi., Isaiah is content with nothing but a new dispensation—the entire transformation of nature, when there shall be no more desert or storm, but to the wild animals docility shall come, and among men an end to sorrow, fraud and war. But again he limits his prophetic soul and promises less. As if, overcome by the spectacle of the more clamant needs and horrible vices of society, he had said, we must first get rid of these, we must supply those, before we can begin to dream of heaven. Such is Isaiah's feeling here. This prophecy is not a vision of society glorified, but of society established and reformed, with its foundation firmly settled (ver. 1), with its fountain forces in full operation (ver. 2), and with an absolute check laid upon its worst habits, as, for instance, the moral grossness, lying and pretence which the prophet has been denouncing for several chapters (vv. 3-8). This moderation of the prophecy brings it within the range of practical morals; while the humanity of it, its freedom from Jewish or Oriental peculiarities, renders it thoroughly modern. If every unfulfilled prophecy ought to be an accusing conscience in the breast of the Christian Church, there will be none more clamant and practical than this one. Its demands are essential to the social interests of to-day.
The first eight verses of chap. xxxii. belong to a type of prophecy that we can refer to as Isaiah's "escapes." Similar to St. Paul, after Isaiah completes a discussion about God's interactions with His people or debates with the sinners among them, he suddenly envisions a future free from constraints, and with a sparked conscience and voice strengthened by previous arguments, he reaches his highest points of eloquence. In Isaiah's writings, we find several of these visions, each distinct based on the type of sinners he has distanced himself from in order to describe it and the kind of anger that filled his heart at that moment. We've already observed that in some of Isaiah's visions, the Messiah holds the central position, while in others, He is completely absent. Yet here, we encounter another inconsistency. Sometimes, as in chap. xi., Isaiah seeks nothing less than a new order—an entire transformation of nature, where deserts and storms will cease to exist, wild animals will become tame, and among people, sorrow, deception, and war will end. But at other times, he constrains his prophetic vision and offers less. It’s as if, overwhelmed by the urgent needs and horrifying vices of society, he thought we must first eliminate these issues and address those needs before we can start imagining a better world. This is the sentiment Isaiah expresses here. This prophecy is not a vision of a glorified society, but of a society that is established and reformed, with a solid foundation (ver. 1), its essential forces fully at work (ver. 2), and strict measures in place against its worst behaviors, such as the moral corruption, deception, and pretense that the prophet has been criticizing for several chapters (vv. 3-8). This moderation in the prophecy makes it align with practical ethics; its humaneness, free from Jewish or Oriental particularities, makes it entirely modern. If every unfulfilled prophecy should act as a reminder of conscience for the Christian Church, none will be more urgent and relevant than this one. Its requirements are vital for today's social concerns.
In ver. 1 we have the presupposition of the whole prophecy: Behold, in righteousness shall a king reign, and princes—according to justice shall they rule. A just government is always the basis of Isaiah's vision of the future. Here he defines it with greater abstractness than he has been wont to do. It is remarkable, that a writer, whose pen has already described the figure[250] of the coming King so concretely and with so much detail, should here content himself with a general promise of a righteous government, regarding, as he seems to do, rather the office of kinghood, than any single eminent occupier of it. That the prophet of Immanuel, and still more the prophet of the Prince-of-the-Four-Names (chap. ix. 7), and of the Son of Jesse (chap. xi. 1), should be able to paint the ideal future, and speak of the just government that was to prevail in it, without at the same time referring to his previous very explicit promises of a royal Individual, is a fact which we cannot overlook in support of the opinion we have expressed on pp. 180 and 181 concerning the object of Isaiah's Messianic hopes.
In verse 1, we see the foundation of the entire prophecy: Look, a king will reign in righteousness, and princes will rule justly. A fair government is always the core of Isaiah's vision for the future. Here, he articulates it in a more abstract way than he usually does. It's noteworthy that a writer who has previously described the figure[250] of the future King so vividly and in such detail, would now settle for a broad promise of just governance, focusing more on the position of kingship rather than any specific individual holding that role. The prophet of Immanuel, and even more so the prophet of the Prince of the Four Names (chap. ix. 7), and of the Son of Jesse (chap. xi. 1), is capable of envisioning the ideal future and discussing the just government that will exist in it, without simultaneously referencing his earlier very clear promises of a royal individual. This is a point we cannot ignore in support of the perspective we shared on pages 180 and 181 regarding Isaiah’s Messianic hopes.
Nor is the vagueness of the first verse corrected by the terms of the second: And a man shall be as an hiding-place from the wind, etc. We have already spoken of this verse as an ethical advance upon Isaiah's previous picture of the Messiah (see p. 182). But while, of course, the Messiah was to Isaiah the ideal of human character, and therefore shared whatsoever features he might foresee in its perfect development, it is evident that in this verse Isaiah is not thinking of the Messiah alone or particularly. When he says with such simplicity a man, he means any man, he means the ideal for every man. Having in ver. 1 laid down the foundation for social life, he tells us in ver. 2 what the shelter and fountain force of society are to be: not science nor material wealth, but personal influence, the strength and freshness of the human personality. A man shall be as an hiding-place from the wind and a covert from the tempest, as rivers of water in a dry place, as the shadow of a great rock in a weary land. After just government (ver. 1) great characters[251] are the prophet's first demand (ver. 2), and then (vv. 3-8) he will ask for the capacity to discriminate character. "Character and the capacity to discriminate character" indeed summarizes this prophecy.
Nor is the vagueness of the first verse clarified by the second: And a man shall be as a hiding-place from the wind, etc. We've already discussed this verse as an ethical improvement over Isaiah's earlier depiction of the Messiah (see p. 182). While the Messiah represents the ideal human character for Isaiah, sharing all the traits he might foresee in its perfect form, it's clear that in this verse, Isaiah isn't focused solely on the Messiah. When he simply says a man, he refers to any man, representing the ideal for everyone. Having established the foundation for social life in verse 1, he explains in verse 2 what the shelter and life-giving force of society should be: not science or material wealth, but personal influence, the strength and vitality of the human spirit. A man shall be as a hiding-place from the wind and a shelter from the storm, like rivers of water in a dry place, like the shadow of a great rock in a weary land. Following just governance (verse 1), strong character is the prophet's first priority (verse 2), and then (verses 3-8) he will seek the ability to discern character. "Character and the ability to discern character" truly sum up this prophecy.
I. A Man (ver. 2).
I. A Man (version 2).
Isaiah has described personal influence on so grand a scale that it is not surprising that the Church has leapt to his words as a direct prophecy of Jesus Christ. They are indeed a description of Him, out of whose shadow advancing time has not been able to carry the children of men, who has been the shelter and fertility of every generation since He was lifted up, and to whom the affections of individual hearts never rise higher than when they sing—
Isaiah has described personal influence on such a grand scale that it’s not surprising that the Church has embraced his words as a direct prophecy of Jesus Christ. They truly depict Him, from whose shadow time has not been able to move the children of men, who has been the shelter and source of life for every generation since He was lifted up, and to whom the feelings of individual hearts never reach higher than when they sing—
"Let me hide myself in You."
Such a rock was Christ indeed; but, in accordance with what we have said above, the prophet here has no individual specially in his view, but is rather laying down a general description of the influence of individual character, of which Christ Jesus was the highest instance. Taken in this sense, his famous words present us, first, with a philosophy of history, at the heart of which there is, secondly, a great gospel, and in the application of which there is, thirdly, a great ideal and duty for ourselves.
Such a rock was Christ for sure; however, as we've mentioned before, the prophet isn’t focusing on any one person in particular but is instead providing a general description of how individual character influences us, with Christ Jesus being the ultimate example. Seen this way, his well-known words give us, first, a philosophy of history, at the core of which lies, secondly, a powerful gospel, and in its application, there is, thirdly, a significant ideal and responsibility for us.
1. Isaiah gives us in this verse a Philosophy of History. Great men are not the whole of life, but they are the condition of all the rest; if it were not for the big men, the little ones could scarcely live. The first requisites of religion and civilisation are outstanding characters.
1. Isaiah presents in this verse a History Philosophy. Great individuals aren’t everything in life, but they are essential for everything else; without those influential figures, the less prominent ones could hardly survive. The primary requirements for religion and civilization are remarkable individuals.
[252]In the East the following phenomenon is often observed. Where the desert touches a river-valley or oasis, the sand is in a continual state of drift from the wind, and it is this drift which is the real cause of the barrenness of such portions of the desert at least as abut upon the fertile land. For under the rain, or by infiltration of the river, plants often spring up through the sand, and there is sometimes promise of considerable fertility. It never lasts. Down comes the periodic drift, and life is stunted or choked out. But set down a rock on the sand, and see the difference its presence makes. After a few showers, to the leeward side of this some blades will spring up; if you have patience, you will see in time a garden. How has the boulder produced this? Simply by arresting the drift.
[252]In the East, the following phenomenon is often seen. Where the desert meets a river valley or oasis, the sand constantly shifts due to the wind, and this shifting is the main reason for the barrenness of those desert areas that border fertile land. Because of rainfall or the river's seepage, plants can sometimes grow through the sand, and there’s often the potential for significant fertility. But it never lasts. The periodic sand drift comes down, and life is either stunted or completely suffocated. However, place a rock on the sand, and notice the difference its presence makes. After a few rains, you’ll see some blades of grass growing on the sheltered side; if you're patient, you’ll eventually witness a garden. How does the boulder create this? Simply by stopping the sand drift.
Now that is exactly how great men benefit human life. A great man serves his generation, serves the whole race, by arresting the drift. Deadly forces, blind and fatal as the desert wind, sweep down human history. In the beginning it was the dread of Nature, the cold blast which blows from every quarter on the barbarian, and might have stunted men to animals. But into some soul God breathed a great breath of freedom, and the man defied Nature. Nature has had her revenge by burying the rebel in oblivion. On the distant horizon of history we can see, merely in some old legend, the evidence of his audacity. But the drift was arrested; behind the event men took shelter, in the shelter grew free, and learned to think out what the first great resister felt.
Now that’s exactly how great people benefit humanity. A great person serves their generation and the whole race by stopping the decline. Deadly forces, as blind and destructive as the desert wind, sweep through human history. In the beginning, it was the fear of Nature, the cold gust that hits every barbarian, and could have turned people into animals. But in some soul, God breathed a powerful breath of freedom, and that person challenged Nature. Nature took her revenge by burying the rebel in obscurity. On the distant horizon of history, we can see, only in some old legend, proof of their bravery. But the decline was stopped; behind that event, people found shelter, and in that shelter, they grew free and learned to understand what the first great resistor experienced.
When history had left this rock behind, and the drift had again space to grow, the same thing happened; and the hero this time was Abraham. He laid his back to[253] the practice of his forefathers, and lifting his brow to heaven, was the first to worship the One Unseen God. Abraham believed; and in the shadow of his faith, and sheltered by his example, his descendants learned to believe too. To-day from within the three great spiritual religions men look back to him as the father of the faithful.
When history moved on from this rock, and nature had room to expand again, the same thing occurred; this time the hero was Abraham. He turned to the traditions of his ancestors, and looking up to the heavens, became the first to worship the One Unseen God. Abraham had faith; and in the light of his belief, and guided by his example, his descendants learned to have faith as well. Today, from within the three major spiritual religions, people look back at him as the father of the faithful.
When Isaiah, while all his countrymen were rushing down the mad, steep ways of politics, carried off by the only powers that were as yet known in these ways, fear of death and greed to be on the side of the strongest—when Isaiah stood still amid that panic rush, and uttered the memorable words, In quietness and in confidence shall be your strength; in returning and rest shall ye be saved, he stopped one of the most dangerous drifts in history, and created in its despite a shelter for those spiritual graces, which have always been the beauty of the State, and are now coming to be recognized as its strength.
When Isaiah, while all his fellow citizens were rushing down the chaotic, steep paths of politics, driven by the only forces familiar to them at the time—fear of death and the desire to align with the strongest—when Isaiah paused amid that frantic rush and spoke the memorable words, In quietness and in confidence shall be your strength; in returning and rest shall ye be saved, he halted one of the most dangerous trends in history and, in doing so, created a refuge for those spiritual qualities that have always enhanced the nation and are now being recognized as its true strength.
When, in the early critical days of the Church, that dark drift of Jewish custom, which had overflown the barriers set to the old dispensation, threatened to spread its barrenness upon the fields of the Gentile world, already white to the harvest of Christ, and Peter and Barnabas and all the Apostles were carried away by it, what was it that saved Christianity? Under God, it was this: that Paul got up and, as he tells us, withstood Peter to the face.
When, in the early critical days of the Church, the negative influence of Jewish customs, which had overflowed the limits set by the old covenant, threatened to spread its emptiness across the Gentile world, which was already ripe for the harvest of Christ, and Peter, Barnabas, and all the Apostles were swept away by it, what is it that saved Christianity? With God’s help, it was this: that Paul stood up and, as he tells us, confronted Peter directly.
And, again, when the powers of the Roman Church and the Roman Empire, checked for a little by the efforts which began the Reformation, gathered themselves together and rose in one awful front of emperor, cardinals, and princes at the Diet of Worms, what was it that stood fast against that drift of centuries, and[254] proved the rock, under whose shelter men dared to read God's pure word again, and preach His Gospel? It was the word of a lonely monk: "Here stand I. I cannot otherwise. So help me, God."
And again, when the powers of the Roman Church and the Roman Empire, briefly held back by the efforts that sparked the Reformation, came together and rose up in a terrifying alliance of emperor, cardinals, and princes at the Diet of Worms, what held strong against that momentum of centuries, and[254] became the foundation, under which people felt safe to read God's pure word again and preach His Gospel? It was the declaration of a solitary monk: "Here I stand. I cannot do otherwise. So help me, God."
So that Isaiah is right. A single man has been as an hiding-place from the wind and a covert from the tempest. History is swept by drifts: superstition, error, poisonous custom, dust-laden controversy. What has saved humanity has been the upraising of some great man to resist those drifts, to set his will, strong through faith, against the prevailing tendency, and be the shelter of the weaker, but not less desirous, souls of his brethren. "The history of what man has accomplished in the world is at bottom the history of the great men who have worked there." Under God, personal human power is the highest force, and God has ever used it as His chief instrument.
So Isaiah is right. A single person has been like a shelter from the wind and a refuge from the storm. History is shaped by powerful forces: superstition, mistakes, harmful customs, and heated debates. What has saved humanity has been the rise of some great individual to push back against these forces, to stand firm with faith against the prevailing trends, and to be a protector for the weaker, yet equally eager, souls of their peers. "The history of what humans have achieved in the world is essentially the history of the great individuals who have made their mark there." Under God, individual human power is the greatest force, and God has always used it as His primary tool.
2. But in this philosophy of history there is a GOSPEL. Isaiah's words are not only man's ideal; they are God's promise, and that promise has been fulfilled in Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ is the most conspicuous example—none others are near Him—of this personal influence in which Isaiah places all the shelter and revival of society. God has set His seal to the truth, that the greatest power in shaping human destiny is man himself, by becoming one with man, by using a human soul to be the Saviour of the race. A man, says Isaiah, shall be as an hiding-place from the wind, as the shadow of a great rock in a weary land; and the Rock of ages was a Man. The world indeed knew that personal character could go higher than all else in the world, but they never knew how high till they saw Jesus Christ, or how often till they numbered His followers.
2. But in this philosophy of history, there's a GOOD NEWS. Isaiah's words are not just humanity’s ideal; they are God's promise, and that promise has been fulfilled in Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ is the most notable example—none come close to Him—of this personal influence that Isaiah attributes to all the shelter and renewal of society. God has confirmed the truth that the greatest power in shaping human destiny is humanity itself, by becoming one with humans, by using a human soul to be the Savior of the world. A man, says Isaiah, shall be like a hiding-place from the wind, like the shade of a great rock in a weary land; and the Rock of ages was a Man. The world indeed recognized that personal character could reach higher than anything else in existence, but they never realized how high until they saw Jesus Christ, or how often until they counted His followers.
[255]This figure of a rock, a rock resisting drift, gives us some idea, not only of the commanding influence of Christ's person, but of that special office from which all the glory of His person and of His name arises: that He saves His people from their sins.
[255]This image of a rock that withstands erosion not only illustrates the powerful impact of Christ's presence but also highlights the unique role from which all the greatness of His being and name comes: that He saves His people from their sins.
For what is sin? Sin is simply the longest, heaviest drift in human history. It arose in the beginning, and has carried everything before it since. "The oldest custom of the race," it is the most powerful habit of the individual. Men have reared against it government, education, philosophy, system after system of religion. But sin overwhelmed them all.
For what is sin? Sin is just the longest, heaviest burden in human history. It began at the start and has pushed everything along since then. "The oldest custom of the race," it is the most compelling habit of the individual. People have set up government, education, philosophy, and one system of religion after another to fight against it. But sin has defeated them all.
Only Christ resisted, and His resistance saves the world. Alone among human lives presented to our view, that of Christ is sinless. What is so prevalent in human nature that we cannot think of a human individual without it never stained Christ's life. Sin was about Him; it was not that He belonged to another sphere of things which lay above it. Sin was about Him. He rose from its midst with the same frailty as other men, encompassed by the same temptations; but where they rose to fall, He rose to stand, and standing, became the world's Saviour. The great tradition was broken; the drift was arrested. Sin never could be the same again after the sinless manhood of Christ. The old world's sins and cruel customs were shut out from the world that came after. Some of them ceased so absolutely as scarcely to be afterwards named; and the rest were so curbed that no civilised society suffered them to pass from its constraint, and no public conscience tolerated them as natural or necessary evils.
Only Christ stood firm, and His resistance saves the world. Unlike any other life we see, Christ's life is without sin. It's so common in human nature that we can’t picture a person without it, yet Christ's life was never tainted by it. Sin surrounded Him; it wasn’t that He existed in a realm above it. Sin was present with Him. He emerged from its midst with the same vulnerability as other men, faced with the same temptations; but while they fell, He stood firm, and in standing, became the world's Savior. The long-standing tradition was broken; the course was changed. Sin could never be the same again after the sinless humanity of Christ. The sins and cruel customs of the old world were excluded from the world that followed. Some of them faded away so completely that they were hardly mentioned again; and the rest were so controlled that no civilized society allowed them to escape from their limits, and no public conscience accepted them as natural or necessary evils.
What the surface of the world's life bears so deeply, that does every individual, who puts his trust in Jesus,[256] feel to the core. Of Jesus the believer can truly say that life on this side of Him is very different from life on that. Temptations keep far away from the heart that keeps near to Christ. Under the shadow of our Rock, for us the evil of the present loses all its suggestiveness, the evil of the past its awful surge of habit and guilty fear.
What the surface of the world’s life holds so deeply, every individual who trusts in Jesus feels to the core. A believer can genuinely say that life on this side of Him is very different from life on that. Temptations stay far away from the heart that stays close to Christ. Under the shelter of our Rock, the troubles of the present lose all their allure, and the pains of the past lose their overwhelming grip of habit and fear.
3. But there is not only a philosophy of history and a gospel in this promise of a man. There is a great DUTY and IDEAL for every one. If this prophecy distinctly reaches forward to Jesus Christ as its only perfect fulfilment, the vagueness of its expression permits of its application to all, and through Him its fulfilment by all becomes a possibility. Now each of us may be a rock, a shelter and a source of fertility to the life around him in three modes of constant influence. We can be like Christ, the Rock, in shutting out from our neighbours the knowledge and infection of sin, in keeping our conversation so unsuggestive and unprovocative of evil, that, though sin drift upon us, it shall never drift through us. And we may be like Christ, the Rock, in shutting out blame from other men; in sheltering them from the east wind of pitiless prejudice, quarrel or controversy; in stopping the unclean and bitter drifts of scandal and gossip. How many lives have lost their fertility for the want of a little silence and a little shadow! Some righteous people have a terribly north-eastern exposure; children do not play about their doors, nor the prodigal stop there. And again, as there are a number of men and women who fall in struggling for virtue simply because they never see it successful in others, and the spectacle of one pure, heroic character would be their salvation, here is another way in which each servant of God may be a rock. Of[257] the late Clerk Maxwell it was said, "He made faith in goodness easy to other men." A man shall be as streams of water in a desert place.
3. But there’s not only a philosophy of history and a message in this promise of a man. There’s a significant RESPONSIBILITY and PERFECT for everyone. If this prophecy clearly points forward to Jesus Christ as its only perfect fulfillment, the ambiguity of its wording allows it to apply to all, and through Him, its fulfillment by everyone becomes possible. Now each of us can be a rock, a refuge, and a source of growth for those around us in three consistent ways. We can be like Christ, the Rock, by shielding our neighbors from the knowledge and spread of sin, keeping our conversations so neutral and unprovocative that even if sin comes our way, it never passes through us. We can also be like Christ, the Rock, by protecting others from blame; by sheltering them from the harsh winds of unyielding prejudice, conflict, or debate; by stopping the dirty and bitter winds of scandal and gossip. How many lives have lost their potential for growth because they lacked a little silence and a little shade! Some righteous people tend to have a harsh and uninviting atmosphere; children don’t play around their homes, nor do the prodigal linger there. Moreover, many men and women fail in their struggle for virtue simply because they never see it succeed in others, and witnessing one pure, heroic character could be their salvation. This is another way each servant of God can be a rock. Of [257] the late Clerk Maxwell, it was said, "He made faith in goodness easy for others." A man shall be as streams of water in a desert place.
II. Capacity to Distinguish Character (vv. 3-8).
II. Ability to Distinguish Character (vv. 3-8).
But after the coming of this ideal, it is not paradise that is regained. Paradise is farther off. We must have truth to begin with: truth and the capacity to discriminate character. The sternness with which Isaiah thus postpones his earlier vision shows us how sore his heart was about the lying temper of his people. We have heard him deploring the fascination of their false minds by the Egyptian Pretence. Their falseness, however, had not only shown itself in their foreign politics, but in their treatment of one another, in their social fashions, judgements and worships. In society there prevailed a want of moral insight and of moral courage. At home also the Jews had failed to call things by their right names (cf. p. 226). Therefore next in their future Isaiah desires the cure of moral blindness, haste and cowardice (vv. 3, 4), with the explosion of all social lies (ver. 5). Men shall stand out for what they are, whether they be bad—for the bad shall not be wanting (vv. 6, 7)—or good (ver. 8). On righteous government (ver. 1) and influence of strong men (ver. 2) must follow social truthfulness (vv. 3-8). Such is the line of the prophet's demands. The details of vv. 3-8 are exceedingly interesting.
But after the arrival of this ideal, we don't regain paradise. Paradise feels further away. We need to start with truth: truth and the ability to recognize character. The seriousness with which Isaiah delays his earlier vision shows how deeply concerned he was about the lying attitude of his people. We've heard him lamenting their attraction to the false narratives from the Egyptian Deception. Their dishonesty manifested not only in their foreign politics but also in how they treated each other, in their social customs, judgments, and worship practices. In society, there was a lack of moral insight and courage. At home too, the Jews failed to call things by their right names (cf. p. 226). Therefore, Isaiah next wishes for a cure for moral blindness, haste, and cowardice (vv. 3, 4), along with the elimination of all social lies (ver. 5). People should stand up for who they are, whether they're bad—because the bad will be present (vv. 6, 7)—or good (ver. 8). Righteous governance (ver. 1) and the influence of strong individuals (ver. 2) must come before social honesty (vv. 3-8). This is the direction of the prophet's demands. The specifics in vv. 3-8 are incredibly interesting.
And not closed shall be the eyes of them that see, and the ears of them that hear shall be pricked up. The context makes it clear that this is spoken, not of intellectual, but of moral, insight and alertness. And the heart of the hasty shall learn how to know, and the tongue of the stammerer be quick (the verb is the same as the hasty of[258] the previous clause) to speak plain things. Startlingly plain things—for the word literally means blinding-white, and is so used of the sun—startlingly plain, like that scorching epigram upon Egypt. The morally rash and the morally timid are equal fathers of lies.
And the eyes of those who see will not be shut, and the ears of those who hear will be attentive. The context makes it clear that this refers not to intellectual but to moral insight and awareness. And the heart of the impulsive will learn to understand, and the tongue of the stammerer will be quick (the verb is the same as the impulsive in[258] the previous clause) to speak clearly. Startlingly clear—for the word literally means blinding-white, as it's used for the sun—startlingly clear, like that burning saying about Egypt. The morally reckless and the morally hesitant are equally the source of falsehoods.
In illustration Isaiah takes the conventional abuse of certain moral terms, exposes it and declares it shall cease: The vile person shall no more be called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful. Liberal and bountiful were conventional names. The Hebrew word for liberal originally meant exactly that—open-hearted, generous, magnanimous. In the East it is the character which above all they call princely. So like our words "noble" and "nobility," it became a term of rank, lord or prince, and was often applied to men who were not at all great-hearted, but the very opposite—even to the vile person. Vile person is literally the faded or the exhausted, whether mentally or morally—the last kind of character that could be princely. The other conventional term used by Isaiah refers to wealth rather than rank. The Hebrew for bountiful literally means abundant, a man blessed with plenty, and is used in the Old Testament both for the rich and the fortunate. Its nearest English equivalent is perhaps the successful man. To this Isaiah fitly opposes a name, wrongly rendered in our version churl, but corrected in the margin to crafty—the fraudulent, the knave. When moral discrimination comes, says Isaiah, men will not apply the term princely to worn-out characters, nor grant them the social respect implied by the term. They will not call the fraudulent the fortunate, nor canonise him as successful, who has gotten his wealth by underhand means. The worthless character shall no more be called princely, nor the knave hailed as the successful. But men's characters shall stand out true in their[259] actions, and by their fruits ye shall know them. In those magic days the heart shall come to the lips, and its effects be unmistakeable. For the worthless person, worthlessness shall he speak—what else can he?—and his heart shall do iniquity, to practise profaneness and to utter against the Lord rank error, to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail. The tools, too, of the knave (a play upon words here—"Keli Kelav," the knave his knives) are evil; he! low tricks he deviseth to destroy the poor with words of falsehood, even when the poor speaks justice (that is, has justice as well as poverty to plead for him). But the princely things deviseth, and he upon princely things shall stand—not upon conventional titles or rank, or the respect of insincere hearts, but upon actual deeds of generosity and sacrifice.
In this passage, Isaiah highlights the misuse of certain moral terms, critiques it, and states that it will stop: The vile person shall no longer be called liberal, nor the miser considered bountiful. Liberal and bountiful were traditional labels. The Hebrew term for liberal originally meant just that—open-hearted, generous, magnanimous. In the East, this quality was what they most admired as princely. So, similar to our words "noble" and "nobility," it became associated with status, referring to a lord or prince, and was often assigned to people who were anything but great-hearted, even to the vile person. The term vile person literally means faded or exhausted, whether mentally or morally—definitely not someone who could be considered princely. The other term Isaiah uses relates to wealth instead of status. The Hebrew word for bountiful literally means abundant, referring to someone blessed with plenty, and it is used in the Old Testament for both the wealthy and the fortunate. Its closest English equivalent might be the successful man. Isaiah contrasts this with a term that is mistakenly translated as churl in our version, but noted in the margin as crafty—the fraudulent, the knave. Isaiah asserts that when moral judgment comes, people will no longer label worn-out individuals as princely, nor give them the social respect that term implies. They won’t call the fraudulent fortunate, nor celebrate as successful someone who gained wealth through dishonest means. The worthless character shall no longer be called princely, nor the knave recognized as successful. Instead, people’s true characters will be revealed through their actions, and you’ll know them by their fruits. In those remarkable days, what’s in the heart will be evident, and there will be no doubt about it. For the worthless person, worthlessness shall be his speech—what else could he say?—and his heart will commit wrongdoing, practicing profanity and uttering against the Lord blatant falsehoods, emptying the souls of the hungry, and causing the thirsting to go without. The tools of the knave (there’s a wordplay here—"Keli Kelav," the knave his knives) are wicked; he devises low schemes to harm the poor with lies, even when the poor speaks justice (meaning, he has both justice and poverty on his side). But he who thinks princely thoughts will stand upon princely things—not on conventional titles or rank, or the hollow respect of insincere hearts, but on true acts of generosity and sacrifice.
After great characters, then, what society needs is capacity to discern character, and the chief obstacle in the way of this discernment is the substitution of a conventional morality for a true morality, and of some distinctions of man's making for the eternal difference which God has set between right and wrong.
After great characters, what society needs is the ability to recognize character, and the main barrier to this recognition is the replacement of conventional morality with true morality, along with the adoption of human-made distinctions instead of the eternal difference that God established between right and wrong.
Human progress consists, according to Isaiah, of getting rid of these conventions; and in this history bears him out. The abolition of slavery, the recognition of the essential nobility of labour, the abolition of infanticide, the emancipation of woman—all these are due to the release of men's minds from purely conventional notions, and the courageous application in their place of the fundamental laws of righteousness and love. If progress is still to continue, it must be by the same method. In many directions it is still a false conventionalism,—sometimes the relic of barbarism, sometimes the fruit of civilisation,—that blocks the way. The[260] savage notions which obstruct the enforcement of masculine purity have to be exposed. Nor shall we ever get true commercial prosperity, or the sense of security which is indispensable to that, till men begin to cease calling transactions all right merely because they are the custom of the trade and the means to which its members look for profits.
Human progress, according to Isaiah, involves eliminating these conventions; history supports this idea. The end of slavery, the acknowledgment of the inherent dignity of work, the ban on infanticide, and the liberation of women—these changes all stem from freeing people's minds from purely conventional ideas and boldly replacing them with the fundamental principles of righteousness and love. For progress to continue, the same approach must be taken. In many areas, it is still false conventionalism—sometimes a remnant of barbarism, sometimes a product of civilization—that stands in the way. The primitive ideas that hinder the promotion of male purity need to be brought to light. We also won't achieve true commercial success or the necessary sense of security until men stop accepting transactions as acceptable merely because they are the norm for the industry and the methods its members rely on for profit.
But, above all, as Isaiah tells us, we need to look to our use of language. It is one of the standing necessities of pure science to revise the terminology, to reserve for each object a special name, and see that all men understand the same object by the same name. Otherwise confusion comes in, and science is impossible. The necessity, though not so faithfully recognized, is as imperative in morals. If we consider the disgraceful mistakes in popular morals which have been produced by the transference and degradation of names, we shall feel it to be a religious duty to preserve for these their proper meaning. In the interests of morality, we must not be careless in our use of moral terms. As Socrates says in the Phædo: "To use words wrongly and indefinitely is not merely an error in itself; it also creates evil in the soul."[49] What noxious misconceptions, what mistaken ideals of life, are due to the abuse of these four words alone: "noble," "gentleman," "honour" and "Christian"! By applying these, in flattery or deceit, to persons unworthy of them, men have not only deprived them of the virtue which originally the mere utterance of them was enough to instil into the heart, but have sent forth to the world under their attractiveness second-rate types of character and[261] ideals. The word "gentleman"! How the heart sickens as it thinks what a number of people have been satisfied to aim at a shoddy and superficial life because it was labelled with this gracious name. Conventionalism has deprived the English language of some of its most powerful sermons by devoting terms of singular moral expressiveness to do duty as mere labels upon characters that are dead, or on ranks and offices, for the designation of which mere cyphers might have sufficed.
But, above all, as Isaiah tells us, we need to pay attention to how we use language. It's essential for pure science to update terminology, assigning each object a specific name, ensuring that everyone understands the same object by the same name. If we don’t, confusion creeps in, making science impossible. This necessity, though not always recognized, is just as crucial in morals. When we think about the embarrassing mistakes in popular morals caused by the misapplication and degradation of names, we realize it’s our responsibility to uphold their proper meanings. For the sake of morality, we can't be careless with moral terms. As Socrates says in the Phædo: "Using words incorrectly and vaguely is not just an error in itself; it also creates evil in the soul." What harmful misunderstandings, what misguided ideals of life, stem from the misuse of just these four words: "noble," "gentleman," "honor," and "Christian"! By applying these terms, whether through flattery or deceit, to unworthy individuals, we have not only stripped them of the virtues that were once conveyed just by saying these words but have also unleashed mediocre models of character and ideals into the world under their appealing guise. The word "gentleman"! It makes you feel ill to think of how many people have settled for a shallow and superficial life just because it was labeled with this noble name. Conventionalism has robbed the English language of some of its most powerful messages by using deeply meaningful terms merely as labels for characters that are empty, or for ranks and positions that could just as easily be designated with simple numbers.
We must not forget, however, Isaiah's chief means for the abolition of this conventionalism and the substitution of a true moral vision and terminology. These results are to follow from the presence of the great character, A Man, whom he has already lifted up. Conventionalism is another of the drifts which that Rock has to arrest. Setting ourselves to revise our dictionaries or to restore to our words their original meanings out of our memories is never enough. The rising of a conspicuous character alone can dissipate the moral haze; the sense of his influence will alone fill emptied forms with meaning. So Christ Jesus judged and judges the world by His simple presence; men fall to His right hand and to His left. He calls things by their right names, and restores to each term of religion and morals its original ideal, which the vulgar use of the world had worn away.[50]
We must not forget, though, that Isaiah's main way of breaking free from this conventionalism and replacing it with a genuine moral perspective and language is through the presence of the great figure, A Man, whom he has already uplifted. Conventionalism is one of the issues that this Rock must address. Merely trying to update our dictionaries or reclaiming the original meanings of our words from memory is never enough. Only the rise of a prominent figure can clear away the moral fog; his influence alone can fill empty concepts with meaning. Christ Jesus judges the world with His simple presence; people gather around Him. He names things as they truly are and restores each religious and moral term to its original ideal, which had been diminished by common use.[50]
CHAPTER XVI.
ISAIAH TO WOMEN.
Isaiah xxxii. 9-20 (DATE UNCERTAIN).
Isaiah xxxii. 9-20 (DATE UNCERTAIN).
The date of this prophecy, which has been appended to those spoken by Isaiah during the Egyptian intrigues (704-702), is not certain. It is addressed to women, and there is no reason why the prophet, when he was upbraiding the men of Judah for their false optimism, should not also have sought to awaken the conscience of their wives and daughters on what is the besetting sin rather of women than of men. The chief evidence for dissociating the prophecy from its immediate predecessors is that it predicts, or apparently predicts (vv. 13-14), the ruin of Jerusalem, whereas in these years Isaiah was careful to exempt the Holy City from the fate which he saw falling on the rest of the land. But otherwise the argument of the prophecy is almost exactly that of chaps. xxix.-xxx. By using the same words when he blames the women for ease and carelessness in vv. 9-11, as he does when he promises confidence and quiet resting-places in vv. 17, 18, Isaiah makes clear that his purpose is to contrast the false optimism of society during the postponement of the Assyrian invasion with that confidence and stability upon righteousness which the Spirit of God can alone create. The prophecy, too, has the[263] usual three stages: sin in the present, judgement in the immediate future, and a state of blessedness in the latter days. The near date at which judgement is threatened—days beyond a year—ought to be compared with chap. xxix. 1: Add ye a year to a year; let the feasts come round.
The date of this prophecy, which has been added to those spoken by Isaiah during the Egyptian intrigues (704-702), is uncertain. It’s directed at women, and there’s no reason why the prophet, while scolding the men of Judah for their false optimism, wouldn't also try to awaken the conscience of their wives and daughters regarding what is more a sin of women than of men. The main reason for separating this prophecy from its immediate predecessors is that it seems to predict (vv. 13-14) the destruction of Jerusalem, whereas during this time Isaiah was careful to spare the Holy City from the fate he foresaw for the rest of the land. Yet, the argument of the prophecy closely aligns with that of chapters xxix.-xxx. By using the same words when he criticizes the women for ease and carelessness in vv. 9-11, as he does when he assures confidence and quiet resting-places in vv. 17, 18, Isaiah makes it clear that his goal is to contrast the false optimism of society during the delay of the Assyrian invasion with that confidence and stability rooted in righteousness, which can only be created by the Spirit of God. The prophecy also follows the usual three stages: sin in the present, judgment in the near future, and a state of blessedness in the latter days. The near date at which judgment is threatened—days beyond a year—should be compared with chapter xxix. 1: Add ye a year to a year; let the feasts come round.
The new points are—that it is the women who are threatened, that Jerusalem itself is pictured in ruin, and that the pouring out of the Spirit is promised as the cause of the blessed future.
The new points are—that it’s the women who are threatened, that Jerusalem itself is shown in ruins, and that the outpouring of the Spirit is promised as the reason for the blessed future.
I. The Charge to the Women (vv. 9-12)
I. The Empowerment of Women (vv. 9-12)
is especially interesting, not merely for its own terms, but because it is only part of a treatment of women which runs through the whole of Scripture.
is especially interesting, not just for its own content, but because it is part of a broader discussion about women that runs throughout the entire Bible.
Isaiah had already delivered against the women of Jerusalem a severe diatribe (chap. iii.), the burden of which was their vanity and haughtiness. With the satiric temper, which distinguishes his earlier prophecies, he had mimicked their ogling and mincing gait, and described pin by pin their fashions and ornaments, promising them instead of these things rottenness and baldness, and a girdle of sackcloth and branding for beauty. But he has grown older, and penetrating below their outward fashion and gait, he charges them with thoughtlessness as the besetting sin of their sex. Ye women that are at ease, rise up, and hear my voice; ye careless daughters, give ear to my speech. For days beyond a year shall ye be troubled, O careless women, for the vintage shall fail; the ingathering shall not come. Tremble, ye women that are at ease; be troubled, ye careless ones. By a pair of epithets he describes their fault; and almost thrice does he repeat the pair, as if he would emphasize it past all doubt. The[264] besetting sin of women, as he dins into them, is ease; an ignorant and unthinking contentment with things as they are; thoughtlessness with regard to the deeper mysteries of life; disbelief in the possibility of change.
Isaiah had already given the women of Jerusalem a harsh critique (chap. iii.), focusing on their vanity and arrogance. With the sarcastic tone that characterizes his earlier prophecies, he mimicked their flirtatious looks and prissy walk and detailed their fashion and jewelry, promising them instead of these things decay and baldness, and a belt of sackcloth and branding for beauty. But he has matured, and looking beyond their outward appearance and behavior, he accuses them of thoughtlessness as the main flaw of their gender. You women who are so comfortable, rise up and listen to my voice; you careless daughters, pay attention to what I have to say. For more than a year, you will be troubled, O carefree women, because the harvest will fail; the gathering will not come. Tremble, you women who are comfortable; be alarmed, you careless ones. With a couple of descriptors, he identifies their fault; and he nearly repeats this pair three times, as if he wants to stress it beyond any doubt. The[264] main flaw of women, as he hammers into them, is ease; a blind and unthinking complacency with how things are; thoughtlessness regarding the deeper mysteries of life; disbelief in the possibility of change.
But Isaiah more than hints that these besetting sins of women are but the defects of their virtues. The literal meaning of the two adjectives he uses, at ease and careless, is restful and trustful. Scripture throughout employs these words both in a good and a bad sense. Isaiah does so himself in this very chapter (compare these verses with vv. 17, 18). In the next chapter he describes the state of Jerusalem after redemption as a state of ease or restfulness, and we know that he never ceased urging the people to trustfulness. For such truly religious conditions he uses exactly the same names as for the shallow optimism with which he now charges his countrywomen. And so doing, he reminds us of an important law of character. The besetting sins of either sex are its virtues prostituted. A man's greatest temptations proceed from his strength; but the glory of the feminine nature is repose, and trust is the strength of the feminine character, in which very things, however, lies all the possibility of woman's degradation. Woman's faith amounts at times to real intuition; but what risks are attached to this prophetic power—of impatience, of contentment with the first glance at things, "the inclination," as a great moralist has put it, "to take too easily the knowledge of the problems of life, and to rest content with what lies nearest her, instead of penetrating to a deeper foundation." Women are full of indulgence and hope; but what possibilities lie there of deception, false optimism, and want of that anxiety which alone makes progress possible. Women are more inclined than men to[265] believe all things; but how certain is such a temper to sacrifice the claims of truth and honour. Women are full of tact, the just favourites of success, with infinite power to plead and please; but if they are aware of this, how certain is such a self-consciousness to produce negligence and the fatal sleep of the foolish virgins.
But Isaiah suggests that these persistent flaws in women are just the downsides of their strengths. The literal meaning of the two adjectives he uses, at ease and careless, is restful and trustful. The Scriptures use these terms in both positive and negative ways. Isaiah does the same in this chapter (compare these verses with vv. 17, 18). In the next chapter, he describes the state of Jerusalem after redemption as a state of ease or restfulness, and we know he consistently encouraged the people to be full of trust. For such genuinely religious qualities, he uses the same terms as he does for the superficial optimism he currently critiques in his countrywomen. By doing this, he reminds us of an important truth about character. The recurring flaws in both men and women are just their strengths gone wrong. A man's greatest temptations arise from his power; however, the beauty of femininity is in calmness, and trust is the strength of a woman’s character, where lies the potential for her downfall. A woman's faith can sometimes feel like real intuition, but this prophetic ability comes with risks—impatience, settling for surface perspectives on life, and as a great moralist noted, "the tendency to too easily accept the knowledge of life's challenges and to be satisfied with what is immediate rather than seeking a deeper understanding." Women often possess compassion and hope; yet within this lies the potential for deception, false optimism, and a lack of the concern that propels progress. Women tend to be more trusting than men, but such an attitude can easily overlook the importance of truth and integrity. Women are skilled at reading situations, often favored for success, with a unique ability to advocate and charm; but if they become aware of this, it can lead to complacency and the dangerous slumber of the foolish virgins.
Scripture insists repeatedly on this truth of Isaiah's about the besetting sin of women. The prophet Amos has engraved it in one of his sharpest epigrams, declaring that thoughtlessness is capable of turning women into very brutes, and their homes into desolate ruins: Hear this word, ye kine of Bashan, that are in the mountain of Samaria, which oppress the poor, which crush the needy, which say unto their lords, Bring and let us drink. The Lord Jehovah hath sworn by His holiness that, lo, the days shall come upon you that they shall take you away with hooks, and your residue with fish-hooks, and ye shall go out at the breaches, every one straight before her, and ye shall cast yourselves into Harmon, saith Jehovah. It is a cowherd's picture of women: a troop of cows, heavy, heedless animals, trampling in their anxiety for food upon every frail and lowly object in the way. There is a cowherd's coarseness in it, but a prophet's insight into character. Not of Jezebels, or Messalinas, or Lady-Macbeths is it spoken, but of the ordinary matrons of Samaria. Thoughtlessness is able to make brutes out of women of gentle nurture, with homes and a religion. For thoughtlessness when joined to luxury or beauty plays with cruel weapons. It means greed, arrogance, indifference to suffering, wantonness, pride of conquest, dissimulation in love, and revenge for little slights; and there is no waste, unkind sport, insolence, brutality, or hysterical violence to which it will not lead. Such women are known, as Amos pictured[266] them, through many degrees of this thoughtlessness: interrupters of conversation, an offence to the wise; devourers of many of the little ones of God's creation for the sake of their own ornament; tormentors of servants and subordinates for the sake of their own ease; out of the enjoyment of power or for admiration's sake breakers of hearts. And are not all such victims of thoughtlessness best compared, with Amos, to a cow—an animal that rushes at its grass careless of the many daisies and ferns it tramples, that will destroy the beauty of a whole country lane for a few mouthfuls of herbage? Thoughtlessness, says Amos—and the Lord GOD hath sworn it by His holiness—is the very negation of womanhood, the ruin of homes.
Scripture constantly emphasizes this truth from Isaiah about the recurring sin of women. The prophet Amos captures it in one of his sharpest statements, asserting that thoughtlessness can turn women into real beasts and their homes into desolate ruins: Listen to this word, you cows of Bashan, who are on the mountain of Samaria, who oppress the poor, crush the needy, and say to your lords, Bring and let us drink. The Lord God has sworn by His holiness that, behold, the days will come upon you when they will take you away with hooks, and your remnants with fish-hooks, and you will go out through the breaks, each one straight before her, and you will cast yourselves into Harmon, says the Lord. It’s a herdsman’s image of women: a group of cows, heavy and heedless, trampling over every fragile and lowly thing in their path because of their desire for food. There’s a coarseness in the herdsman’s view, but also the insight of a prophet into character. This isn’t about Jezebels, or Messalinas, or Lady Macbeths, but about the ordinary women of Samaria. Thoughtlessness can turn women of gentle upbringing, with homes and faith, into brutes. When thoughtlessness is combined with luxury or beauty, it wields cruel weapons. It manifests as greed, arrogance, indifference to suffering, recklessness, pride in dominance, deceit in love, and revenge over slight grievances; and it leads to waste, unkind behavior, insolence, brutality, and hysterical violence. Such women are identified, as Amos described them, through various degrees of thoughtlessness: they interrupt conversations, annoying the wise; they consume the little ones of God’s creation for their own vanity; they torment servants and subordinates for their own comfort; out of the desire for power or admiration, they break hearts. And aren’t all such victims of thoughtlessness best compared, with Amos, to a cow—an animal that rushes toward its grass, indifferent to the daisies and ferns it tramples, ruining the beauty of an entire country lane for a few bites of vegetation? Thoughtlessness, says Amos—and the Lord God has sworn it by His holiness—is the complete negation of womanhood and the destruction of homes.
But when we turn from the degradation of woman as thus exposed by the prophets to her glory as lifted up in the New Testament, we find that the same note is struck. Woman in the New Testament is gracious according as she is thoughtful; she offends even when otherwise beautiful by her feeling overpowering her thought. Martha spoils a most estimable character by one moment of unthinking passion, in which she accuses the Master of carelessness. Mary chooses the better part in close attention to her Master's words. The Ten Virgins are divided into five wise and five foolish. Paul seems to have been struck, as Isaiah was, with the natural tendency of the female character, for the first duty he lays upon the old women is to teach the young women to think discreetly, and he repeats the injunction, putting it before chastity and industry—Teach them, he says, teach them discretion (Titus ii. 4, 5). In Mary herself, the mother of our Lord, we see two graces of character, to the honour of which Scripture gives equal place—faith and thoughtfulness. The few sentences,[267] which are all that he devotes to Mary's character, the Evangelist divides equally between these two. She was called blessed because she believed the word of the Lord. But trustfulness did not mean in her, as in other women, neglect to think. Twice, at an interval of twelve years, we are shown thoughtfulness and carefulness of memory as the habitual grace of this first among women. Mary kept all these things and pondered them in her heart. His mother kept all these sayings in her heart.[51] What was Mary's glory was other women's salvation. By her own logic the sufferer of Capernaum, whom many physicians failed to benefit, found her cure; by her persistent argument the Syrophenician woman received her daughter to health again. And when our Lord met that flippant descendant of the kine of Bashan, that are in the mount of Samaria, how did He treat her that He might save her but by giving her matter to think about, by speaking to her in riddles, by exploding her superficial knowledge, and scattering her easy optimism?
But when we shift from the degradation of women exposed by the prophets to their glory recognized in the New Testament, we see the same idea reflected. In the New Testament, women are portrayed as graceful when they are thoughtful; they become less admirable when their emotions overwhelm their thoughts. Martha tarnishes her otherwise commendable character with a moment of thoughtless passion, where she accuses the Master of being careless. In contrast, Mary chooses the better path by paying close attention to her Master's words. The Ten Virgins are categorized into five wise and five foolish. Paul, like Isaiah, observes the natural tendencies of women since the first duty he assigns to older women is to teach the young women to think wisely. He emphasizes this command, placing it before chastity and hard work—Teach them, he instructs, teach them discretion (Titus ii. 4, 5). In Mary, the mother of our Lord, we recognize two admirable qualities that Scripture equally honors—faith and thoughtfulness. The few lines[267] he devotes to Mary's character are evenly divided between these two. She was called blessed because she believed the word of the Lord. However, her trustfulness did not translate to neglecting to think, unlike in other women. Twice, with a twelve-year gap, we see her thoughtfulness and attention to memory as consistent qualities of this first among women. Mary kept all these things and pondered them in her heart. His mother kept all these sayings in her heart.[51] What brought Mary glory also represented salvation for other women. By her reasoning, the sufferer from Capernaum, whom many doctors could not heal, found her cure; through her insistence, the Syrophenician woman restored her daughter’s health. And when our Lord encountered that flippant descendant of the kine of Bashan, that are in the mount of Samaria, how did He approach her to save her? By giving her something to think about, by speaking in riddles, by challenging her superficial understanding, and dismantling her easy optimism.
So does all Scripture declare, in harmony with the oracle of Isaiah, that thoughtlessness and easy contentment with things as they be, are the besetting sins of woman. But her glory is discretion.
So does all Scripture say, in line with the words of Isaiah, that carelessness and being too comfortable with the way things are are the main faults of women. But her strength is her wisdom.
II. The next new point in this prophecy is the
II. The next new point in this prophecy is the
Destruction of Jerusalem (vv. 13-15).
Destruction of Jerusalem (vv. 13-15).
Upon the land of my people shall come up thorns and briers; yea, upon all the houses of joy in the joyous city: for the palace shall be forsaken; the populous city shall be deserted; Ophel and the Watch-tower shall be for dens for ever, a joy of wild asses, a pasture of flocks. The attempt has been made to confine this reference to the[268] outskirts of the sacred city, but it is hardly a just one. The prophet, though he does not name the city, evidently means Jerusalem, and means the whole of it. Some therefore deny the authenticity of the prophecy. Certainly it is almost impossible to suppose, that so definite a sentence of ruin can have been published at the same time as the assurances of Jerusalem's inviolability in the preceding orations. But that does not prevent the hypothesis that it was uttered by Isaiah at an earlier period, when, as in chaps. ii. and iii., he did say extreme things about the destruction of his city. It must be noticed, however, that Isaiah speaks with some vagueness; that at the present moment he is not concerned with any religious truth or will of the Almighty, but simply desires to contrast the careless gaiety of the women of Jerusalem with the fate hanging over them. How could he do this more forcibly than by turning the streets and gardens of their delights into ruins and the haunts of the wild ass, even though it should seem inconsistent with his declaration that Zion was inviolable? Licence for a certain amount of inconsistency is absolutely necessary in the case of a prophet who had so many divers truths to utter to so many opposite interests and tempers. Besides, at this time he had already reduced Jerusalem very low (xxix. 4).
Thorns and thistles will grow up on the land of my people; yes, on all the joyful homes in the happy city: the palace will be abandoned; the bustling city will be deserted; Ophel and the Watch-tower will turn into dens forever, a playground for wild donkeys, a pasture for flocks. The attempt has been made to limit this reference to the[268] outskirts of the holy city, but that’s hardly fair. The prophet, though he doesn’t name the city, clearly means Jerusalem, and he means all of it. Some therefore dispute the authenticity of the prophecy. It’s certainly quite difficult to believe that such a specific statement of ruin could have been made at the same time as the assurances of Jerusalem's safety in the earlier speeches. However, that doesn’t rule out the possibility that it was spoken by Isaiah at an earlier time when, like in chapters ii and iii, he did make extreme statements about the destruction of his city. It should be noted, though, that Isaiah speaks somewhat vaguely; at this moment he isn’t focused on any religious truth or the will of God, but simply wants to contrast the careless joy of the women of Jerusalem with the impending fate looming over them. How could he make this contrast more powerfully than by turning the streets and gardens of their pleasures into ruins and places for wild donkeys, even if that seems to conflict with his statement that Zion was untouchable? A bit of inconsistency is absolutely necessary for a prophet who had to convey many different truths to various opposite interests and moods. Besides, by this time he had already brought Jerusalem down quite a bit (xxix. 4).
III. The Spirit Outpoured (vv. 15-20).
III. The Spirit Outpoured (vv. 15-20).
The rest of the prophecy is luminous rather than lucid, full of suffused rather than distinct meanings. The date of the future regeneration is indefinite—another feature more in harmony with Isaiah's earlier prophecies than his later. The cause of the blessing is the outpouring of the Spirit of God (ver. 15). Righteousness[269] and peace are to come to earth by a distinct creative act of God. Isaiah adds his voice to the invariable testimony of prophets and apostles, who, whether they speak of society or the heart of individual man, place their hope in new life from above by the Spirit of the living God. Victor Hugo says, "There are no weeds in society, only bad cultivators;" and places all hope of progress towards perfection in proper methods of social culture. These are needed, as much as the corn, which will not spring from the sunshine alone, requires the hand of the sower, and the harrow. And Isaiah, too, speaks here of human conduct and effort as required to fill up the blessedness of the future: righteousness and labour. But first, and indispensably, he, with all the prophets, places the Spirit of God.
The rest of the prophecy is bright rather than clear, filled with subtle meanings rather than distinct ones. The timing of the future renewal is uncertain—another aspect that aligns more with Isaiah's earlier prophecies than his later ones. The source of the blessing is the outpouring of the Spirit of God (ver. 15). Righteousness[269] and peace will come to earth through a specific creative act of God. Isaiah joins the consistent message of prophets and apostles, who, whether they are discussing society or the individual heart, place their hope in new life from above through the Spirit of the living God. Victor Hugo says, "There are no weeds in society, only bad cultivators;" and ties all hope for progress toward perfection to proper methods of social cultivation. These methods are necessary, just as corn, which can't grow from sunlight alone, needs the farmer's hand and the plow. And Isaiah also addresses the need for human action and effort to realize the blessings of the future: righteousness and labor. But first and foremost, he, along with all the prophets, emphasizes the Spirit of God.
It appears that Isaiah looked for the fruits of the Spirit both as material and moral. He bases the quiet resting-places and regular labours of the future not on righteousness only, but on fertility and righteousness. The wilderness shall become a fruitful field, and what is to-day a fruitful field shall be counted as a forest. That this proverb, used by Isaiah more than once, is not merely a metaphor for the moral revolution he describes in the next verse, is proved by his having already declared the unfruitfulness of their soil as part of his people's punishment. Fertility is promised for itself, and as the accompaniment of moral bountifulness. And there shall dwell in the wilderness justice, and righteousness shall abide in the fruitful field. And the work of righteousness shall be peace, and the effect, or service, of righteousness, quietness and confidence for ever. And my people shall abide in a peaceable habitation, and in sure dwellings, and in quiet resting-places.[270]... Blessed are ye that sow beside all waters, that send forth the feet of the ox and the ass!
It seems that Isaiah sought the benefits of the Spirit in both physical and moral ways. He connects the peaceful homes and steady work of the future not only to righteousness but also to fertility and righteousness. The wilderness will turn into a fruitful field, and what is a fruitful field today will be seen as a forest. This saying, which Isaiah uses more than once, is more than just a metaphor for the moral change he describes in the next verse; he has already pointed out the infertility of their land as part of his people's punishment. Fertility is promised for its own sake and as a sign of moral abundance. And justice will dwell in the wilderness, and righteousness will settle in the fruitful field. The outcome of righteousness will be peace, and the result or benefit of righteousness will be calmness and confidence forever. And my people will live in a peaceful home, in secure dwellings, and in quiet resting places.[270]... Blessed are you who plant beside all waters, who let the ox and the donkey go free!
There is not a prophecy more characteristic of Isaiah. It unfolds what for him were the two essential and equal contents of the will of God: a secure land and a righteous people, the fertility of nature and the purity of society. But in those years (705-702) he did not forget that something must come between him and that paradise. Across the very middle of his vision of felicity there dashes a cruel storm. In the gap indicated above Isaiah wrote, But it shall hail in the downfall of the forest, and the city shall be utterly laid low. A hailstorm between the promise and fulfilment of summer! Isaiah could only mean the Assyrian invasion, which was now lowering so dark. Before it bursts we must follow him to the survey which he made, during these years before the siege of Jerusalem, of the foreign nations on whom, equally with Jerusalem, that storm was to sweep.
There isn’t a prophecy that captures Isaiah better. It reveals what he saw as the two key elements of God’s will: a safe land and a just people, the richness of nature and the clarity of society. However, during those years (705-702), he didn’t forget that something had to come between him and that paradise. Right in the center of his vision of happiness, a harsh storm looms. In the gap mentioned earlier, Isaiah wrote, But it shall hail in the downfall of the forest, and the city shall be utterly laid low. A hailstorm stands between the promise and the fulfillment of summer! Isaiah could only be referring to the Assyrian invasion, which was now threatening darkly. Before it strikes, we need to follow him as he examines the foreign nations that, along with Jerusalem, will feel the impact of that storm during the years leading up to the siege of Jerusalem.
CHAPTER XVII.
ISAIAH TO THE FOREIGN NATIONS.
Isaiah xiv. 24-32, xv.-xxi., and xxiii. (736-702 B.C.).
Isaiah xiv. 24-32, xv.-xxi., and xxiii. (736-702 BCE).
The centre of the Book of Isaiah (chaps. xiii. to xxiii.) is occupied by a number of long and short prophecies which are a fertile source of perplexity to the conscientious reader of the Bible. With the exhilaration of one who traverses plain roads and beholds vast prospects, he has passed through the opening chapters of the book as far as the end of the twelfth; and he may look forward to enjoying a similar experience when he reaches those other clear stretches of vision from the twenty-fourth to the twenty-seventh and from the thirtieth to the thirty-second. But here he loses himself among a series of prophecies obscure in themselves and without obvious relation to one another. The subjects of them are the nations, tribes and cities with which in Isaiah's day, by war or treaty or common fear in face of the Assyrian conquest, Judah was being brought into contact. There are none of the familiar names of the land and tribes of Israel which meet the reader in other obscure prophecies and lighten their darkness with the face of a friend. The names and allusions are foreign, some of them the names of tribes long since extinct, and of places which it is no more possible to identify. It is a very jungle of prophecy, in[272] which, without much Gospel or geographical light, we have to grope our way, thankful for an occasional gleam of the picturesque—a sandstorm in the desert, the forsaken ruins of Babylon haunted by wild beasts, a view of Egypt's canals or Phœnicia's harbours, a glimpse of an Arab raid or of a grave Ethiopian embassy.
The middle of the Book of Isaiah (chapters 13 to 23) contains several lengthy and short prophecies that can really confuse a thoughtful reader of the Bible. After the excitement of traveling through the straightforward chapters up to the end of the twelfth, he might look forward to a similar experience when he reaches the clear passages from the twenty-fourth to the twenty-seventh and from the thirtieth to the thirty-second. But here he gets lost in a series of prophecies that are unclear on their own and don’t seem connected. These prophecies focus on the nations, tribes, and cities that Judah interacted with in Isaiah's time, whether through war, treaties, or shared fears of the Assyrian invasion. The reader won’t find familiar names from the land and tribes of Israel here, which usually help illuminate other obscure prophecies. Instead, the names and references are foreign—some belonging to tribes that no longer exist and places that can no longer be identified. It feels like a dense thicket of prophecy, where we have to feel our way through without much guidance, grateful for the occasional vivid image—a sandstorm in the desert, the abandoned ruins of Babylon overrun by wild animals, a view of Egypt’s canals or Phoenicia’s ports, a glimpse of an Arab raid, or an Ethiopian delegation.
But in order to understand the Book of Isaiah, in order to understand Isaiah himself in some of the largest of his activities and hopes, we must traverse this thicket. It would be tedious and unprofitable to search every corner of it. We propose, therefore, to give a list of the various oracles, with their dates and titles, for the guidance of Bible-readers, then to take three representative texts and gather the meaning of all the oracles round them.
But to understand the Book of Isaiah and Isaiah himself in relation to his major activities and hopes, we need to navigate through this complex area. It would be boring and unproductive to examine every detail. So, we plan to provide a list of the different oracles, along with their dates and titles, to help Bible readers. Then, we will take three key texts and explore the meaning of all the oracles around them.
First, however, two of the prophecies must be put aside. The twenty-second chapter does not refer to a foreign State, but to Jerusalem itself; and the large prophecy which opens the series (chaps. xiii.-xiv. 23) deals with the overthrow of Babylon in circumstances that did not arise till long after Isaiah's time, and so falls to be considered by us along with similar prophecies at the close of this volume. (See Book V.)
First, though, we need to set aside two of the prophecies. The twenty-second chapter isn’t about a foreign nation but refers to Jerusalem itself; and the major prophecy that begins the series (chaps. xiii.-xiv. 23) addresses the fall of Babylon in situations that didn’t occur until long after Isaiah's time, so we’ll consider it along with similar prophecies at the end of this volume. (See Book V.)
All the rest of these chapters—xiv.-xxi. and xxiii.—refer to Isaiah's own day. They were delivered by the prophet at various times throughout his career; but the most of them evidently date from immediately after the year 705, when, on the death of Sargon, there was a general rebellion of the Assyrian vassals.
All the rest of these chapters—xiv.-xxi. and xxiii.—talk about Isaiah's own time. The prophet delivered them at different moments during his career; however, most of them clearly come from right after the year 705, when, following Sargon's death, there was a widespread rebellion among the Assyrian vassals.
1. xiv. 24-27. Oath Of Jehovah that the Assyrian shall be broken. Probable date, towards 701.
1. xiv. 24-27. God's Oath that the Assyrian will be defeated. Likely date, around 701.
2. xiv. 28-32. Oracle For Philistia. Warning to Philistia not to rejoice because one Assyrian king is[273] dead, for a worse one shall arise: Out of the serpent's root shall come forth a basilisk. Philistia shall be melted away, but Zion shall stand. The inscription to this oracle (ver. 28) is not genuine. The oracle plainly speaks of the death and accession of Assyrian, not Judæan, kings. It may be ascribed to 705, the date of the death of Sargon and accession of Sennacherib. But some hold that it refers to the previous change on the Assyrian throne—the death of Salmanassar and the accession of Sargon.
2. xiv. 28-32. Oracle for Philistia. A warning to Philistia not to celebrate just because one Assyrian king is[273]dead, since an even worse one will come: Out of the serpent's root shall come forth a basilisk. Philistia will fade away, but Zion will endure. The heading for this oracle (ver. 28) is not authentic. The oracle clearly refers to the death and rise of Assyrian kings, not Judaean ones. It can be linked to 705, the year Sargon's death and Sennacherib's rise. However, some believe it refers to the earlier transition on the Assyrian throne—the death of Salmanassar and the rise of Sargon.
3. xv.-xvi. 12. Oracle for Moab. A long prophecy against Moab. This oracle, whether originally by himself at an earlier period of his life, or more probably by an older prophet, Isaiah adopts and ratifies, and intimates its immediate fulfilment, in xvi. 13, 14. This is the word which Jehovah spake concerning Moab long ago. But now Jehovah hath spoken, saying, Within three years, as the years of an hireling, and the glory of Moab shall be brought into contempt with all the great multitude, and the remnant shall be very small and of no account. The dates both of the original publication of this prophecy and of its reissue with the appendix are quite uncertain. The latter may fall about 711, when Moab was threatened by Sargon for complicity in the Ashdod conspiracy (p. 198), or in 704, when, with other States, Moab came under the cloud of Sennacherib's invasion. The main prophecy is remarkable for its vivid picture of the disaster that has overtaken Moab and for the sympathy with her which the Jewish prophet expresses; for the mention of a remnant of Moab; for the exhortation to her to send tribute in her adversity to the mount of the daughter of Zion (xvi. 1); for an appeal to Zion to shelter the outcasts of Moab and to take up her cause: Bring counsel, make a decision,[274] make thy shadow as the night in the midst of the noonday; hide the outcasts, bewray not the wanderer; for a statement of the Messiah similar to those in chaps. ix. and xi.; and for the offer to the oppressed Moabites of the security of Judah in Messianic times (vv. 4, 5). But there is one great obstacle to this prospect of Moab lying down in the shadow of Judah—Moab's arrogance. We have heard of the pride of Moab, that he is very proud (ver. 6, cf. Jer. xlviii. 29, 42; Zeph. ii. 10), which pride shall not only keep this country in ruin, but prevent the Moabites prevailing in prayer at their own sanctuary (ver. 12)—a very remarkable admission about the worship of another god than Jehovah.
3. xv.-xvi. 12. Oracle for Moab. A lengthy prophecy against Moab. This oracle, whether it was originally given by him at an earlier time in his life or more likely by an older prophet, is embraced and confirmed by Isaiah, who indicates its immediate fulfillment in xvi. 13, 14. This is the message that Jehovah spoke about Moab long ago. But now Jehovah has declared, saying, Within three years, like the years of a hired worker, the glory of Moab will be brought low along with all the great multitude, and the remnant will be very small and insignificant. The timeline for both the original announcement of this prophecy and its later reissue with the appendix is quite uncertain. The latter might date back to around 711, when Moab was threatened by Sargon for being involved in the Ashdod conspiracy (p. 198), or in 704, during Sennacherib's invasion when Moab, along with other states, faced danger. The main prophecy is notable for its vivid depiction of the disaster that befalls Moab and the sympathy the Jewish prophet shows for her; for mentioning a remnant of Moab; for urging her to send tribute in her time of trouble to the mount of the daughter of Zion (xvi. 1); for appealing to Zion to provide refuge for Moab's outcasts and take up their cause: Bring counsel, make a decision,[274] make your shadow like the night in the middle of the day; hide the outcasts, do not reveal the wanderer; for a statement about the Messiah similar to those in chapters ix. and xi.; and for offering the oppressed Moabites the safety of Judah during Messianic times (vv. 4, 5). However, there is one significant barrier to the hope of Moab resting in the shadow of Judah—Moab's pride. We have heard about the pride of Moab, that he is very proud (ver. 6, cf. Jer. xlviii. 29, 42; Zeph. ii. 10), and this pride will not only keep the country in ruins but will also prevent the Moabites from succeeding in prayer at their own sanctuary (ver. 12)—a remarkable acknowledgment of the worship of a god other than Jehovah.
4. xvii. 1-11. Oracle for Damascus. One of the earliest and most crisp of Isaiah's prophecies. Of the time of Syria's and Ephraim's league against Judah, somewhere between 736 and 732.
4. xvii. 1-11. Oracle for Damascus. This is one of Isaiah's earliest and clearest prophecies, referring to the period when Syria and Ephraim allied against Judah, around 736 to 732.
5. xvii. 12-14. Untitled. The crash of the peoples upon Jerusalem and their dispersion. This magnificent piece of sound, which we analyse below, is usually understood of Sennacherib's rush upon Jerusalem. Verse 14 is an accurate summary of the sudden break-up and "retreat from Moscow" of his army. The Assyrian hosts are described as nations, as they are elsewhere more than once by Isaiah (xxii. 6, xxix. 7). But in all this there is no final reason for referring the oracle to Sennacherib's invasion, and it may just as well be interpreted of Isaiah's confidence of the defeat of Syria and Ephraim (734-723). Its proximity to the oracle against Damascus would then be very natural, and it would stand as a parallel prophecy to viii. 9: Make an uproar, O ye peoples, and ye shall be broken in pieces; and give ear, all ye of the distances of the earth: gird yourselves, and ye shall be[275] broken in pieces; gird yourselves, and ye shall be broken in pieces—a prophecy which we know belongs to the period of the Syro-Ephraimitic league.
5. xvii. 12-14. Untitled. The attack of the nations on Jerusalem and their scattering. This powerful message, which we will analyze below, is commonly interpreted as Sennacherib's assault on Jerusalem. Verse 14 effectively summarizes the quick disbanding and "retreat from Moscow" of his army. The Assyrian forces are referred to as nations, as Isaiah describes them several times (xxii. 6, xxix. 7). However, there's no compelling reason to connect this prophecy specifically to Sennacherib's invasion; it could just as easily reflect Isaiah's confidence in the defeat of Syria and Ephraim (734-723). Its closeness to the prophecy against Damascus makes sense, and it serves as a parallel prophecy to viii. 9: Make an uproar, O ye peoples, and you will be shattered; listen, all you from the ends of the earth: prepare yourselves, and you will be broken in pieces; prepare yourselves, and you will be broken in pieces—a prophecy we know is linked to the era of the Syro-Ephraimitic alliance.
6. xviii. Untitled. An address to Ethiopia, land of a rustling of wings, land of many sails, whose messengers dart to and fro upon the rivers in their skiffs of reed. The prophet tells Ethiopia, cast into excitement by the news of the Assyrian advance, how Jehovah is resting quietly till the Assyrian be ripe for destruction. When the Ethiopians shall see His sudden miracle, they shall send their tribute to Jehovah, to the place of the name of Jehovah of hosts, Mount Zion. It is difficult to know to which southward march of Assyria to ascribe this prophecy—Sargon's or Sennacherib's? For at the time of both of these an Ethiopian ruled Egypt.
6. xviii. Untitled. A message for Ethiopia, the land of buzzing wings, the land of numerous sails, where messengers zip back and forth on the rivers in their reed boats. The prophet tells Ethiopia, stirred by the news of the Assyrian advance, that Jehovah is calmly waiting until the Assyrian is ready for destruction. When the Ethiopians witness His sudden miracle, they will send their tribute to Jehovah, to the place called Jehovah of hosts, Mount Zion. It’s hard to determine which southern march of Assyria this prophecy refers to—Sargon’s or Sennacherib’s? Because during both of these times, an Ethiopian ruled Egypt.
7. xix. Oracle for Egypt. The first fifteen verses describe judgement as ready to fall on the land of the Pharaohs. The last ten speak of the religious results to Egypt of that judgement, and they form the most universal and "missionary" of all Isaiah's prophecies. Although doubts have been expressed of the Isaian authorship of the second half of this chapter on the score of its universalism, as well as of its literary style, which is judged to be "a pale reflection" of Isaiah's own, there is no final reason for declining the credit of it to Isaiah, while there are insuperable difficulties against relegating it to the late date which is sometimes demanded for it. On the date and authenticity of this prophecy, which are of great importance for the question of Isaiah's "missionary" opinions, see Cheyne's introduction to the chapter and Robertson Smith's notes in The Prophets of Israel (p. 433). The latter puts it in 703, during Sennacherib's advance[276] upon the south. The former suggests that the second half may have been written by the prophet much later than the first, and justly says, "We can hardly imagine a more 'swan-like end' for the dying prophet."
7. xix. Oracle for Egypt. The first fifteen verses depict impending judgment on the land of the Pharaohs. The last ten address the religious consequences of that judgment for Egypt, making them the most universal and "missionary" among all of Isaiah's prophecies. Although some have questioned whether Isaiah wrote the second half of this chapter due to its universal themes and its literary style, which is seen as "a pale reflection" of Isaiah's own, there’s no strong reason to deny Isaiah's authorship. At the same time, there are significant challenges to pushing it to a later date than what is sometimes suggested. For the date and authenticity of this prophecy, which are crucial for understanding Isaiah's "missionary" views, see Cheyne's introduction to the chapter and Robertson Smith's notes in The Prophets of Israel (p. 433). The latter dates it to 703, during Sennacherib's advance[276] into the south. The former proposes that the second half may have been written by the prophet much later than the first, and rightly states, "We can hardly imagine a more 'swan-like end' for the dying prophet."
8. xx. Untitled. Also upon Egypt, but in narrative and of an earlier date than at least the latter half of xix. Tells how Isaiah walked naked and barefoot in the streets of Jerusalem for a sign against Egypt and against the help Judah hoped to get from her in the years 711-709, when the Tartan, or Assyrian commander-in-chief, came south to subdue Ashdod. See pp. 198-200.
8. xx. Untitled. This also relates to Egypt, but it's a narrative from earlier than at least the latter half of xix. It explains how Isaiah walked around naked and barefoot in the streets of Jerusalem as a sign against Egypt and the assistance Judah was expecting to receive from her during the years 711-709, when the Tartan, or Assyrian commander-in-chief, traveled south to conquer Ashdod. See pp. 198-200.
9. xxi. 1-10. Oracle for the Wilderness of the Sea, announcing but lamenting the fall of Babylon. Probably 709. See pp. 202, 203.
9. xxi. 1-10. Oracle for the Sea's Wilderness, announcing yet mourning the downfall of Babylon. Probably 709. See pp. 202, 203.
10. xxi. 11, 12. Oracle for Dumah. Dumah, or Silence—in Ps. xciv. 17, cxv. 17, the land of the silence of death, the grave—is probably used as an anagram for Edom and an enigmatic sign to the wise Edomites, in their own fashion, of the kind of silence their land is lying under—the silence of rapid decay. The prophet hears this silence at last broken by a cry. Edom cannot bear the darkness any more. Unto me one is calling from Seir, Watchman, how much off the night? how much off the night?[52] Said the watchman, Cometh the morning, and also the night: if ye will inquire, inquire, come back again. What other answer is possible for a land on which the silence of decay seems to have settled down? He may, however,[277] give them an answer later on, if they will come back. Date uncertain, perhaps between 704 and 701.
10. xxi. 11, 12. Oracle for Dumah. Dumah, or Silence—in Ps. xciv. 17, cxv. 17, the land of the silence of death, the grave—is likely used as a play on words for Edom and a mysterious signal to the wise Edomites, indicating the kind of silence their land is experiencing—the silence of rapid decay. The prophet finally hears this silence break with a cry. Edom can't endure the darkness any longer. There’s someone calling from Seir, Watchman, how much longer till morning? how much longer till morning?[52] The watchman replied, The morning is coming, and also the night: if you want to ask, ask, come back again. What other answer could there be for a land where the silence of decay seems to have taken hold? However, he may provide them an answer later if they come back. Date uncertain, possibly between 704 and 701.
11. xxi. 13-17. Oracle For Arabia. From Edom the prophet passes to their neighbours the Dedanites, travelling merchants. And as he saw night upon Edom, so, by a play upon words, he speaks of evening upon Arabia: in the forest, in Arabia, or with the same consonants, in the evening. In the time of the insecurity of the Assyrian invasion the travelling merchants have to go aside from their great trading roads in the evening to lodge in the thickets. There they entertain fugitives, or (for the sense is not quite clear) are themselves as fugitives entertained. It is a picture of the grievousness of war, which was now upon the world, flowing down even those distant, desert roads. But things have not yet reached the worst. The fugitives are but the heralds of armies, that within a year shall waste the children of Kedar, for Jehovah, the God of Israel, hath spoken it. So did the prophet of little Jerusalem take possession of even the far deserts in the name of his nation's God.
11. xxi. 13-17. Oracle for Arabia. From Edom, the prophet moves on to their neighbors, the Dedanites, who are traveling merchants. Just as he observes darkness over Edom, he metaphorically refers to evening in Arabia: in the forest, in Arabia, or with the same consonants, in the evening. During the uncertain times of the Assyrian invasion, the traveling merchants have to divert from their major trade routes in the evening to stay in the thickets. There, they host fugitives, or (since the meaning is not entirely clear) they themselves are hosted as fugitives. It illustrates the grievousness of war, which was now affecting the world, reaching even those remote, desert paths. However, conditions have not yet reached their worst. The fugitives are merely the harbingers of armies that within a year will devastate the children of Kedar, for Jehovah, the God of Israel, has declared it. Thus, the prophet from little Jerusalem claimed even the far deserts in the name of his nation's God.
12. xxiii. Oracle For Tyre. Elegy over its fall, probably as Sennacherib came south upon it in 703 or 702. To be further considered by us (pp. 288 ff.).
12. xxiii. Tire Oracle. A lament for its downfall, likely as Sennacherib advanced toward it in 703 or 702. To be discussed further by us (pp. 288 ff.).
These then are Isaiah's oracles for the Nations, who tremble, intrigue and go down before the might of Assyria.
These are Isaiah's messages for the nations, who are shaken, scheming, and falling before the power of Assyria.
We have promised to gather the circumstances and meaning of these prophecies round three representative texts. These are—
We promised to collect the context and significance of these prophecies around three key texts. These are—
1. Ah! the booming of the peoples, the multitudes, like the booming of the seas they boom; and the rushing of the[278] nations, like the rushing of mighty waters they rush; nations, like the rushing of many waters they rush. But He rebuketh it, and it fleeth afar off, and is chased like the chaff on the mountains before the wind and like whirling dust before the whirlwind (xvii. 12, 13).
1. Ah! the clamor of the people, the crowds, like the roar of the seas they roar; and the rush of the[278]nations, like the surge of powerful waters, they surge; nations, like the surge of many waters, they surge. But He rebukes it, and it flees far away, chased like chaff on the mountains by the wind and like swirling dust before the whirlwind (xvii. 12, 13).
2. What then shall one answer the messengers of a nation? That Jehovah hath founded Zion, and in her shall find refuge the afflicted of His people (xiv. 32).
2. What should one say to the messengers of a nation? That the Lord has established Zion, and in her the afflicted of His people will find refuge (xiv. 32).
3. In that day shall Israel be a third to Egypt and to Assyria, a blessing in the midst of the earth, for that Jehovah of hosts hath blessed them, saying, Blessed be My people Egypt, and the work of My hands Assyria, and Mine inheritance Israel (xix. 24, 25).
3. On that day, Israel will be a third alongside Egypt and Assyria, a blessing in the middle of the earth, because the Lord of Hosts has blessed them, saying, "Blessed be My people Egypt, the work of My hands Assyria, and My inheritance Israel." (xix. 24, 25).
1. The first of these texts shows all the prophet's prospect filled with storm, the second of them the solitary rock and lighthouse in the midst of the storm: Zion, his own watchtower and his people's refuge; while the third of them, looking far into the future, tells us, as it were, of the firm continent which shall rise out of the waters—Israel no longer a solitary lighthouse, but in that day shall Israel be a third to Egypt and to Assyria, a blessing in the midst of the earth. These three texts give us a summary of the meaning of all Isaiah's obscure prophecies to the foreign nations—a stormy ocean, a solitary rock in the midst of it, and the new continent that shall rise out of the waters about the rock.
1. The first of these texts highlights the prophet’s view filled with turmoil, the second describes the solitary rock and lighthouse in the chaos: Zion, his own watchtower and his people's refuge; while the third, looking far into the future, speaks of the solid land that will emerge from the waters—Israel no longer just a solitary lighthouse, but on that day Israel will stand alongside Egypt and Assyria, a blessing in the midst of the earth. These three texts summarize the essence of all Isaiah's complex prophecies regarding foreign nations—a stormy sea, a solitary rock within it, and the new land that will rise from the waters surrounding the rock.
The restlessness of Western Asia beneath the Assyrian rule (from 719, when Sargon's victory at Rafia extended that rule to the borders of Egypt) found vent, as we saw (p. 198), in two great Explosions, for both of which the mine was laid by Egyptian intrigue. The first Explosion happened in 711, and was confined to Ashdod. The second took place on Sargon's death in 705, and was universal. Till[279] Sennacherib marched south on Palestine in 701, there were all over Western Asia hurryings to and fro, consultations and intrigues, embassies and engineerings from Babylon to Meroe in far Ethiopia, and from the tents of Kedar to the cities of the Philistines. For these Jerusalem the one inviolate capital from the Euphrates to the river of Egypt, was the natural centre. And the one far-seeing, steady-hearted man in Jerusalem was Isaiah. We have already seen that there was enough within the city to occupy Isaiah's attention, especially from 705 onward; but for Isaiah the walls of Jerusalem, dear as they were and thronged with duty, neither limited his sympathies nor marked the scope of the gospel he had to preach. Jerusalem is simply his watchtower. His field—and this is the peculiar glory of the prophet's later life—his field is the world.
The restlessness of Western Asia under Assyrian rule (starting in 719, when Sargon’s victory at Rafia extended that rule to the borders of Egypt) expressed itself, as we saw (p. 198), in two major outbursts, both sparked by Egyptian intrigue. The first outburst occurred in 711 and was limited to Ashdod. The second happened after Sargon died in 705 and was widespread. Until[279] Sennacherib marched south into Palestine in 701, there were movements throughout Western Asia—meetings, plotting, diplomatic missions, and strategies from Babylon to Meroe in far Ethiopia, and from the tents of Kedar to the cities of the Philistines. For these reasons, Jerusalem, the one unassailable capital from the Euphrates to the river of Egypt, became the natural center. The one far-sighted, steady man in Jerusalem was Isaiah. We have already noted that there was plenty going on within the city to demand Isaiah's attention, especially from 705 onwards; but for Isaiah, the walls of Jerusalem, as cherished as they were and filled with responsibility, neither restricted his empathy nor defined the reach of the message he had to share. Jerusalem is simply his lookout point. His mission—and this is the unique honor of the prophet's later life—his mission is the world.
How well fitted Jerusalem then was to be the world's watchtower, the traveller may see to this day. The city lies upon the great central ridge of Palestine, at an elevation of two thousand five hundred feet above the level of the sea. If you ascend the hill behind the city, you stand upon one of the great view-points of the earth. It is a forepost of Asia. To the east rise the red hills of Moab and the uplands of Gilead and Bashan, on to which wandering tribes of the Arabian deserts beyond still push their foremost camps. Just beyond the horizon lie the immemorial paths from Northern Syria into Arabia. Within a few hours' walk along the same central ridge, and still within the territory of Judah, you may see to the north, over a wilderness of blue hills, Hermon's snowy crest; you know that Damascus is lying just beyond, and that through it and round the base of Hermon swings one of the longest of the old world's[280] highways—the main caravan road from the Euphrates to the Nile. Stand at gaze for a little, while down that road there sweep into your mind thoughts of the great empire, whose troops and commerce it used to carry. Then, bearing these thoughts with you, follow the line of the road across the hills to the western coastland, and so out upon the great Egyptian desert, where you may wait till it has brought you imagination of the southern empire to which it travels. Then, lifting your eyes a little further, let them sweep back again from south to north, and you have the whole of the west, the new world, open to you, across the fringe of yellow haze that marks the sands of the Mediterranean. It is even now one of the most comprehensive prospects in the world. But in Isaiah's day, when the world was smaller, the high places of Judah either revealed or suggested the whole of it.
How well-suited Jerusalem is to be the world's lookout, travelers can see even today. The city sits on the central ridge of Palestine, at an elevation of two thousand five hundred feet above sea level. If you climb the hill behind the city, you stand on one of the best viewpoints on Earth. It's a strategic outpost of Asia. To the east rise the red hills of Moab and the highlands of Gilead and Bashan, where wandering tribes from the Arabian deserts still set up their camps. Just beyond the horizon lie ancient paths from Northern Syria into Arabia. Within a few hours' walk along the same ridge, still in Judah, you can see to the north, over a sea of blue hills, the snowy peak of Hermon; you know that Damascus is just beyond and that through it and around the base of Hermon runs one of the longest routes of the ancient world—the main caravan road from the Euphrates to the Nile. Stand for a moment, and let your mind wander down that road with thoughts of the great empire whose armies and trade it used to carry. Then, carrying those thoughts, follow the road’s path across the hills to the western coast and out into the vast Egyptian desert, where you can wait until it brings to mind the southern empire it reaches. Then, lifting your gaze a bit further, let it sweep back from south to north, and you’ll see all of the west, the new world, spread out before you, over the edge of yellow haze that highlights the sands of the Mediterranean. Even now, it’s one of the most expansive views in the world. But in Isaiah's time, when the world was smaller, the high places of Judah revealed or hinted at the entirety of it.
But Isaiah was more than a spectator of this vast theatre. He was an actor upon it. The court of Judah, of which during Hezekiah's reign he was the most prominent member, stood in more or less close connection with the courts of all the kingdoms of Western Asia; and in those days when the nations were busy with intrigue against their common enemy this little highland town and fortress became a gathering place of peoples. From Babylon, from far-off Ethiopia, from Edom, from Philistia, and no doubt from many other places also, embassies came to King Hezekiah, or to inquire of his prophet. The appearance of some of them lives for us still in Isaiah's descriptions: tall and shiny figures of Ethiopians (xviii. 2), with whom we are able to identify the lithe, silky-skinned, shining-black bodies of the present tribes of the Upper Nile. Now the prophet must have talked much with these strangers,[281] for he displays a knowledge of their several countries and ways of life that is full and accurate. The agricultural conditions of Egypt; her social ranks and her industries (xix.); the harbours and markets of Tyre (xxiii.); the caravans of the Arab nomads as in times of war they shun the open desert and seek the thickets (xxi. 14)—Isaiah paints these for us with a vivid realism. We see how this statesman of the least of States, this prophet of a religion which was confessed over only a few square miles, was aware of the wide world, and how he loved the life that filled it. They are no mere geographical terms with which Isaiah thickly studs these prophecies. He looks out upon, and paints for us, lands and cities surging with men—their trades, their castes, their religions, their besetting tempers and sins, their social structures and national policies, all quick and bending to the breeze and the shadow of the coming storm from the north.
But Isaiah was more than just an observer in this grand scene. He was a key player. The court of Judah, where he was the most influential figure during Hezekiah's reign, was closely connected with the courts of all the kingdoms in Western Asia. In those times when nations were caught up in plotting against their common enemy, this small highland town and fortress became a hub for various peoples. Embassies came to King Hezekiah from Babylon, distant Ethiopia, Edom, Philistia, and likely many other places too, either to seek his counsel or that of his prophet. Isaiah's descriptions still bring to life the image of tall and shiny figures of Ethiopians (xviii. 2), reminiscent of the smooth-skinned, shining-black bodies of today's tribes along the Upper Nile. The prophet must have engaged in many conversations with these visitors,[281] as he showcases a thorough and precise understanding of their diverse countries and lifestyles. He describes the agricultural practices of Egypt; its social hierarchies and industries (xix.); the ports and markets of Tyre (xxiii.); and how the nomadic Arab caravans avoid the open desert and seek cover in the thickets during wartime (xxi. 14)—Isaiah illustrates these details with vivid realism. We can see how this statesman from a small state, this prophet of a faith recognized by only a handful of people, was aware of the broader world and cherished the life within it. The geographical references in Isaiah's prophecies are not mere terms. He gazes out upon lands and cities bustling with people—their trades, their classes, their faiths, their enduring flaws and sins, their social systems and national agendas, all alive and swaying in response to the winds and shadows of the impending storm from the north.
We have said that in nothing is the regal power of our prophet's style so manifest as in the vast horizons, which, by the use of a few words, he calls up before us. Some of the finest of these revelations are made in this part of his book, so obscure and unknown to most. Who can ever forget those descriptions of Ethiopia in the eighteenth chapter?—"Ah! the land of the rustling of wings, which borders on the rivers of Cush, which sendeth heralds on the sea, and in vessels of reed on the face of the waters! Travel, fleet messengers, to a people lithe and shining, to a nation feared from ever it began to be, a people strong, strong and trampling, whose land the rivers divide; or of Tyre in chapter xxiii.?—"And on great waters the seed of Shihor, the harvest of the Nile, was her revenue; and she was the mart of nations. What expanses of sea! what fleets of ships! what floating loads[282] of grain! what concourse of merchants moving on stately wharves beneath high warehouses!
We have noted that nothing showcases the royal power of our prophet's style as vividly as the vast landscapes he conjures up with just a few words. Some of the most striking of these revelations are found in this part of his book, which remains largely obscure and unknown to many. Who can ever forget those descriptions of Ethiopia in the eighteenth chapter?—"Ah! the land of the rustling of wings, which borders on the rivers of Cush, which sends heralds across the sea, and in vessels made of reeds on the surface of the waters! Travel, swift messengers, to a people agile and radiant, to a nation feared since its beginnings, a powerful people, strong and crushing, whose land is divided by rivers; or Tyre in chapter twenty-three?—"And on great waters the seed of Shihor, the harvest of the Nile, was her revenue; and she was the marketplace of nations. What vast seas! What fleets of ships! What floating loads[282] of grain! What gatherings of merchants moving on grand wharves beneath tall warehouses!
Yet these are only segments of horizons, and perhaps the prophet reaches the height of his power of expression in the first of the three texts, which we have given as representative of his prophecies on foreign nations (p. 278). Here three or four lines of marvellous sound repeat the effect of the rage of the restless world as it rises, storms and breaks upon the steadfast will of God. The phonetics of the passage are wonderful. The general impression is that of a stormy ocean booming in to the shore and then crashing itself out into one long hiss of spray and foam upon its barriers. The details are noteworthy. In ver. 12 we have thirteen heavy M-sounds, besides two heavy B's, to five N's, five H's, and four sibilants. But in ver. 13 the sibilants predominate; and before the sharp rebuke of the Lord the great, booming sound of ver. 12 scatters out into a long yish-shā 'oon. The occasional use of a prolonged vowel amid so many hurrying consonants produces exactly the effect now of the lift of a storm swell out at sea and now of the pause of a great wave before it crashes on the shore. "Ah, the booming of the peoples, the multitudes, like the booming of the seas they boom; and the rushing of the nations, like the rushing of the mighty waters they rush: nations, like the rushing of many waters they rush. But He checketh it—a short, sharp word with a choke and a snort in it—and it fleeth far away, and is chased like chaff on mountains before wind, and like swirling dust before a whirlwind."
Yet these are just fragments of horizons, and maybe the prophet truly showcases his ability to express himself in the first of the three texts, which we’ve chosen as a representative example of his prophecies about foreign nations (p. 278). Here, three or four lines of amazing sound echo the fury of the restless world as it rises, storms, and crashes against the unwavering will of God. The phonetics of this passage are incredible. The overall impression is that of a stormy ocean thundering toward the shore and then breaking into a long hiss of spray and foam against its barriers. The details are striking. In verse 12, we find thirteen heavy M-sounds, along with two heavy B's, five N's, five H's, and four sibilants. But in verse 13, the sibilants take over; and before the sharp reprimand of the Lord, the great, booming sound of verse 12 scatters into a long yish-shā 'oon. The occasional use of an elongated vowel among so many quick consonants creates the effect, at times, of the rise of a storm swell at sea, and at other times, of the pause of a huge wave before it crashes onto the shore. "Ah, the booming of the peoples, the multitudes, like the booming of the seas they boom; and the rushing of the nations, like the rushing of the mighty waters they rush: nations, like the rushing of many waters they rush. But He checketh it”—a short, sharp word with a choke and a snort in it—and it fleeth far away, and is chased like chaff on mountains before wind, and like swirling dust before a whirlwind."
So did the rage of the world sound to Isaiah as it crashed into pieces upon the steadfast providence of God. To those who can feel the force of such[283] language nothing need be added upon the prophet's view of the politics of the outside world these twenty years, whether portions of it threatened Judah in their own strength, or the whole power of storm that was in it rose with the Assyrian, as in all his flood he rushed upon Zion in the year 701.
So, to Isaiah, the world's anger felt like it shattered against the unchanging will of God. For those who truly understand the weight of such[283] words, nothing more needs to be said about the prophet's perspective on the politics of the world over the past twenty years, whether specific groups were a direct threat to Judah or the entire force of chaos surged with the Assyrian, as it flooded toward Zion in the year 701.
2. But amid this storm Zion stands immovable. It is upon Zion that the storm crashes itself into impotence. This becomes explicit in the second of our representative texts: What then shall one answer the messengers of a nation? That Jehovah hath founded Zion, and in her shall find a refuge the afflicted of His people (xiv. 32). This oracle was drawn from Isaiah by an embassy of the Philistines. Stricken with panic at the Assyrian advance, they had sent messengers to Jerusalem, as other tribes did, with questions and proposals of defences, escapes and alliances. They got their answer. Alliances are useless. Everything human is going down. Here, here alone, is safety, because the Lord hath decreed it.
2. But in the middle of this storm, Zion remains unshakeable. It’s on Zion that the storm breaks itself into nothingness. This is made clear in our second reference: What then shall one answer the messengers of a nation? That Jehovah has founded Zion, and in her shall find a refuge the afflicted of His people (xiv. 32). This message was taken from Isaiah by an envoy from the Philistines. Overwhelmed with fear at the Assyrian advance, they sent messengers to Jerusalem, like other tribes, with questions and suggestions for defenses, escapes, and alliances. They received their answer. Alliances are ineffective. Everything human is collapsing. Here, and here alone, is safety because the Lord has decided it.
With what light and peace do Isaiah's words break out across that unquiet, hungry sea! How they tell the world for the first time, and have been telling it ever since, that, apart from all the struggle and strife of history, there is a refuge and security of men, which God Himself has assured. The troubled surface of life, nations heaving uneasily, kings of Assyria and their armies carrying the world before them—these are not all. The world and her powers are not all. Religion, in the very teeth of life, builds her refuge for the afflicted.
With what light and peace Isaiah's words shine through that restless, yearning sea! They reveal to the world for the first time, and have been doing so ever since, that beyond all the struggles and conflicts of history, there is a safe haven and security for humanity, promised by God Himself. The chaotic nature of life, nations restless and kings of Assyria with their armies dominating the world—this isn't all there is. The world and its powers are not everything. Religion, in the face of life's challenges, creates a refuge for the hurting.
The world seems wholly divided between force and fear. Isaiah says, It is not true. Faith has her abiding citadel in the midst, a house of God, which neither force can harm nor fear enter.[284]
The world appears completely split between power and fear. Isaiah says that's not true. Faith has her lasting stronghold in the middle, a house of God that neither power can damage nor fear can enter.[284]
This then was Isaiah's Interim-Answer to the Nations—Zion at least is secure for the people of Jehovah.
This was Isaiah's temporary response to the nations—Zion is at least safe for the people of the Lord.
3. Isaiah could not remain content, however, with so narrow an interim-answer: Zion at least is secure, whatever happens to the rest of you. The world was there, and had to be dealt with and accounted for—had even to be saved. As we have already seen, this was the problem of Isaiah's generation; and to have shirked it would have meant the failure of his faith to rank as universal.
3. Isaiah couldn't be satisfied with such a limited response: at least Zion is safe, no matter what happens to the others. The world existed, and it needed to be addressed and taken into account— it even needed to be saved. As we've already noted, this was the issue faced by Isaiah's generation; ignoring it would mean that his faith couldn't be considered universal.
Isaiah did not shirk it. He said boldly to his people, and to the nations: "The faith we have covers this vaster life. Jehovah is not only God of Israel. He rules the world." These prophecies to the foreign nations are full of revelations of the sovereignty and providence of God. The Assyrian may seem to be growing in glory; but Jehovah is watching from the heavens, till he be ripe for cutting down (xviii. 4). Egypt's statesmen may be perverse and wilful; but Jehovah of hosts swingeth His hand against the land: they shall tremble and shudder (xix. 16). Egypt shall obey His purposes (17). Confusion may reign for a time, but a signal and a centre shall be lifted up, and the world gather itself in order round the revealed will of God. The audacity of such a claim for his God becomes more striking when we remember that Isaiah's faith was not the faith of a majestic or a conquering people. When he made his claim, Judah was still tributary to Assyria, a petty highland principality, that could not hope to stand by material means against the forces which had thrown down her more powerful neighbours. It was no experience of success, no mere instinct of being on the side of fate, which led Isaiah so resolutely to pronounce that not only should his people be secure,[285] but that his God would vindicate His purposes upon empires like Egypt and Assyria. It was simply his sense that Jehovah was exalted in righteousness. Therefore, while inside Judah only the remnant that took the side of righteousness would be saved, outside Judah wherever there was unrighteousness, it would be rebuked, and wherever righteousness, it would be vindicated. This is the supremacy which Isaiah proclaimed for Jehovah over the whole world.
Isaiah didn't back down. He boldly told his people and the nations: "Our faith encompasses this greater life. Jehovah is not just the God of Israel. He rules the world." These prophecies aimed at foreign nations reveal God’s sovereignty and providence. The Assyrian might seem to be gaining power, but Jehovah is watching from the heavens, waiting until he’s ready to be cut down (xviii. 4). Egypt's leaders may be stubborn and reckless, but Jehovah of hosts is raising His hand against the land: they will tremble and shudder (xix. 16). Egypt will follow His plans (17). There may be chaos for a while, but a sign and a center will be raised, and the world will align itself around the revealed will of God. The boldness of such a claim for his God is even more striking when we remember that Isaiah’s faith did not come from a grand or conquering people. At that time, Judah was still under the control of Assyria, a small highland kingdom that couldn’t compete with the stronger forces that had defeated its more powerful neighbors. It wasn’t past success or a mere feeling of being favored by fate that led Isaiah to firmly declare that not only would his people be safe, [285] but that his God would fulfill His purposes against empires like Egypt and Assyria. It was simply his belief that Jehovah was supreme in righteousness. So, while only the remnant within Judah that sided with righteousness would be saved, outside of Judah, wherever there was injustice, it would be challenged, and wherever there was righteousness, it would be upheld. This is the supremacy that Isaiah declared for Jehovah over the entire world.
How spiritual this faith of Isaiah was, is seen from the next step the prophet took. Looking out on the troubled world, he did not merely assert that his God ruled it, but he emphatically said, what was a far more difficult thing to say, that it would all be consciously and willingly God's. God rules this, not to restrain it only, but to make it His own. The knowledge of Him, which is to-day our privilege, shall be to-morrow the blessing of the whole world.
How spiritual Isaiah's faith was is evident from the next step the prophet took. Looking out at the troubled world, he didn't just claim that his God was in control; he boldly stated, which was much harder to say, that everything would consciously and willingly belong to God. God rules this not just to restrain it, but to make it His own. The knowledge of Him, which is our privilege today, will be the blessing of the entire world tomorrow.
When we point to the Jewish desire, so often expressed in the Old Testament, of making the whole world subject to Jehovah, we are told that it is simply a proof of religious ambition and jealousy. We are told that this wish to convert the world no more stamps the Jewish religion as being a universal, and therefore presumably a Divine, religion than the Mohammedans' zeal to force their tenets on men at the point of the sword is a proof of the truth of Islam.
When we highlight the Jewish desire, frequently mentioned in the Old Testament, to make the entire world subject to Jehovah, we are told it simply demonstrates religious ambition and jealousy. We're told that this wish to convert the world doesn’t make the Jewish religion any more universal, and therefore presumably Divine, than the Muslims' eagerness to impose their beliefs on others by force proves the truth of Islam.
Now we need not be concerned to defend the Jewish religion in its every particular, even as propounded by an Isaiah. It is an article of the Christian creed that Judaism was a minor and imperfect dispensation, where truth was only half revealed and virtue half developed. But at least let us do the Jewish religion justice; and[286] we shall never do it justice till we pay attention to what its greatest prophets thought of the outside world, how they sympathized with this, and in what way they proposed to make it subject to their own faith.
Now we don’t need to worry about defending every detail of the Jewish religion, even as presented by an Isaiah. It's a part of the Christian belief that Judaism was a lesser and incomplete phase, where truth was only partially revealed and virtue only partially developed. But at the very least, let’s give the Jewish religion its due; and[286] we won’t truly do that until we consider what its greatest prophets thought about the outside world, how they empathized with it, and in what way they intended to bring it under their faith.
Firstly then, there is something in the very manner of Isaiah's treatment of foreign nations, which causes the old charges of religious exclusiveness to sink in our throats. Isaiah treats these foreigners at least as men. Take his prophecies on Egypt or on Tyre or on Babylon—nations which were the hereditary enemies of his nation—and you find him speaking of their natural misfortunes, their social decays, their national follies and disasters, with the same pity and with the same purely moral considerations, with which he has treated his own land. When news of those far-away sorrows comes to Jerusalem, it moves this large-hearted prophet to mourning and tears. He breathes out to distant lands elegies as beautiful as he has poured upon Jerusalem. He shows as intelligent an interest in their social evolutions as he does in those of the Jewish State. He gives a picture of the industry and politics of Egypt as careful as his pictures of the fashions and statecraft of Judah. In short, as you read his prophecies upon foreign nations, you perceive that before the eyes of this man humanity, broken and scattered in his days as it was, rose up one great whole, every part of which was subject to the same laws of righteousness, and deserved from the prophet of God the same love and pity. To some few tribes he says decisively that they shall certainly be wiped out, but even them he does not address in contempt or in hatred. The large empire of Egypt, the great commercial power of Tyre, he speaks of in language of respect and admiration; but that does not prevent him from putting the plain issue[287] to them which he put to his own countrymen: If you are unrighteous, intemperate, impure—lying diplomats and dishonest rulers, you shall certainly perish before Assyria. If you are righteous, temperate, pure, if you do trust in truth and God, nothing can move you.
Firstly, there’s something about how Isaiah addresses foreign nations that makes the old claims of religious exclusivity hard to swallow. Isaiah treats these foreigners as fellow humans. Look at his prophecies regarding Egypt, Tyre, or Babylon—nations that were traditional enemies of his own people—and you’ll see him discussing their natural misfortunes, social declines, and national foolishness and disasters with the same compassion and moral perspective he shows towards his own country. When news of their distant sorrows reaches Jerusalem, it brings this big-hearted prophet to tears. He expresses his grief for these far-off lands with elegies as beautiful as the ones he wrote for Jerusalem. He shows just as much concern for their social changes as he does for those in the Jewish State. His descriptions of Egypt’s industry and politics are as detailed as his portrayals of Judah’s trends and political maneuvers. In short, as you read his prophecies about foreign nations, it becomes clear that, in Isaiah's eyes, humanity—broken and fragmented in his time—appears as a unified whole, where each part is governed by the same moral laws and deserves the same love and compassion from God’s prophet. He decisively tells a few tribes that they will be wiped out, but he doesn't speak to them with contempt or hatred. He addresses the vast empire of Egypt and the powerful trading city of Tyre with respect and admiration; yet, that doesn’t stop him from delivering a blunt message to them, just as he did to his own people: If you are unjust, reckless, or corrupt—if you have deceitful diplomats and dishonest leaders—you will surely fall before Assyria. If you are just, self-controlled, and honest, and if you trust in truth and God, nothing will shake you.
But, secondly, he, who thus treated all nations with the same strict measures of justice and the same fulness of pity with which he treated his own, was surely not far from extending to the world the religious privileges, which he has so frequently identified with Jerusalem. In his old age, at least Isaiah looked forward to the time when the particular religious opportunities of the Jew should be the inheritance of humanity. For their old oppressor Egypt, for their new enemy Assyria, he anticipates the same experience and education, which has made Israel the firstborn of God. Speaking to Egypt, Isaiah concludes a missionary sermon, fit to take its place beside that which Paul uttered on the Areopagus to the younger Greek civilisation, with the words, In that day shall Israel be a third to Egypt and to Assyria, a blessing in the midst of the earth, for that Jehovah of hosts hath blessed them, saying, Blessed be Egypt My people, and Assyria the work of My hands and Israel Mine inheritance.
But, secondly, he, who treated all nations with the same strict standards of justice and the same depth of compassion that he showed his own people, was definitely close to offering the world the religious privileges he often associated with Jerusalem. By the time he was older, Isaiah was at least looking forward to the moment when the unique religious opportunities of the Jews would belong to all of humanity. Regarding their old oppressor Egypt and their new enemy Assyria, he envisions the same journey and growth that made Israel the firstborn of God. Speaking to Egypt, Isaiah wraps up a missionary message that could stand alongside Paul’s speech on the Areopagus to the younger Greek civilization, with the words, In that day shall Israel be a third to Egypt and to Assyria, a blessing in the midst of the earth, for that Jehovah of hosts hath blessed them, saying, Blessed be Egypt My people, and Assyria the work of My hands and Israel Mine inheritance.
CHAPTER XVIII.
TYRE; OR, THE MERCENARY SPIRIT.
Isaiah xxiii. (702 B.C.).
Isaiah 23. (702 B.C.).
The task, which was laid upon the religion of Israel while Isaiah was its prophet, was the task, as we have often told ourselves, of facing the world's forces, and of explaining how they were to be led captive and contributory to the religion of the true God. And we have already seen Isaiah accounting for the largest of these forces: the Assyrian. But besides Assyria, that military empire, there was another power in the world, also novel to Israel's experience and also in Isaiah's day grown large enough to demand from Israel's faith explanation and criticism. This was Commerce, represented by the Phœnicians, with their chief seats at Tyre and Sidon, and their colonies across the seas. Not even Egypt exercised such influence on Isaiah's generation as Phœnicia did; and Phœnician influence, though less visible and painful than Assyrian, was just as much more subtle and penetrating as in these respects the influence of trade exceeds that of war. Assyria herself was fascinated by the glories of Phœnician commerce. The ambition of her kings, who had in that century pushed south to the Mediterranean, was to found a commercial empire. The mercenary spirit, as we learn from prophets earlier than Isaiah, had begun also to leaven the life of the[289] agricultural and shepherd tribes of Western Asia. For good or for evil commerce had established itself as a moral force in the world. Isaiah's chapter on Tyre is, therefore, of the greatest interest. It contains the prophet's vision of commerce the first time commerce had grown vast enough to impress his people's imagination, as well as a criticism of the temper of commerce from the standpoint of the religion of the God of righteousness. Whether as a historical study or a message addressed to the mercantile tempers of our own day, the chapter is worthy of close attention.
The task placed upon the religion of Israel while Isaiah was its prophet was, as we've often reminded ourselves, to confront the world's forces and explain how they could be brought under the influence of the true God. We've already seen Isaiah addressing the largest of these forces: the Assyrian Empire. However, in addition to Assyria, there was another power in the world that was new to Israel's experience and had also grown significant enough during Isaiah's time to require explanation and critique from Israel's faith. This was trade, represented by the Phoenicians, with their major cities in Tyre and Sidon and their colonies across the seas. Even Egypt did not have as much impact on Isaiah's generation as Phoenicia did; and although Phoenician influence was less visible and direct than Assyrian, it was just as subtle and pervasive, reflecting how trade can be more influential than war. Assyria itself was captivated by the splendor of Phoenician trade. The ambitions of its kings, who had moved south to the Mediterranean during that century, were to establish a commercial empire. The mercenary spirit, as noted by earlier prophets, had begun to influence the lives of the agricultural and pastoral tribes of Western Asia. For better or worse, commerce had established itself as a moral force in the world. Isaiah's chapter on Tyre is therefore of great importance. It presents the prophet's vision of commerce at a time when it had grown large enough to capture his people's imagination, as well as a critique of the nature of commerce from the perspective of the God of righteousness. Whether seen as a historical study or a message directed at our own contemporary mercantile attitudes, this chapter deserves careful attention.
But we must first impress ourselves with the utter contrast between Phœnicia and Judah in the matter of commercial experience, or we shall not feel the full force of this excursion which the prophet of a high, inland tribe of shepherds makes among the wharves and warehouses of the great merchant city on the sea.
But we first need to understand the stark difference between Phoenicia and Judah regarding commercial experience; otherwise, we won't grasp the complete significance of this journey that the prophet from a prominent, inland tribe of shepherds takes through the docks and storage buildings of the vast merchant city by the sea.
The Phœnician empire, it has often been remarked, presents a very close analogy to that of Great Britain; but even more entirely than in the case of Great Britain the glory of that empire was the wealth of its trade, and the character of the people was the result of their mercantile habits. A little strip of land, one hundred and forty miles long, and never more than fifteen broad, with the sea upon one side and the mountains upon the other, compelled its inhabitants to become miners and seamen. The hills shut off the narrow coast from the continent to which it belongs, and drove the increasing populations to seek their destiny by way of the sea. These took to it kindly, for they had the Semite's born instinct for trading. Planting their colonies all round the Mediterranean, exploiting every mine within reach of the coastland,[290] establishing great trading depôts both on the Nile and the Euphrates, with fleets that passed the Straits of Gibraltar into the Atlantic and the Straits of Bab-el-Mandeb into the Indian Ocean, the Phœnicians constructed a system of trade, which was not exceeded in range or influence till, more than two thousand years later, Portugal made the discovery of America and accomplished the passage of the Cape of Good Hope. From the coasts of Britain to those of Northwest India, and probably to Madagascar, was the extent of Phœnician credit and currency. Their trade tapped river basins so far apart as those of the Indus, the Euphrates, probably the Zambesi, the Nile, the Rhone, the Guadalquivir. They built ships and harbours for the Pharaohs and for Solomon. They carried Egyptian art and Babylonian knowledge to the Grecian archipelago, and brought back the metals of Spain and Britain. No wonder the prophet breaks into enthusiasm as he surveys Phœnician enterprise! And on great waters the seed of Shihor, the harvest of the Nile, was her revenue; and she was the mart of nations.
The Phoenician empire has often been compared to that of Great Britain; however, even more so than in Great Britain, the glory of that empire came from its trading wealth, and the character of its people was shaped by their mercantile habits. A narrow stretch of land, one hundred and forty miles long and never more than fifteen miles wide, with the sea on one side and mountains on the other, forced its inhabitants to become miners and sailors. The hills separated the narrow coastline from the continent it belonged to, driving the growing populations to seek their future through the sea. They embraced this challenge, thanks to the Semitic instinct for trade. By establishing colonies all around the Mediterranean, exploiting every mine accessible from the coast, setting up major trading depots along the Nile and the Euphrates, and navigating fleets that crossed the Strait of Gibraltar into the Atlantic and the Strait of Bab-el-Mandeb into the Indian Ocean, the Phoenicians developed a trading system that wouldn’t be matched in extent or influence until more than two thousand years later, when Portugal discovered America and navigated around the Cape of Good Hope. The reach of Phoenician credit and currency extended from the coasts of Britain to those of Northwest India, and likely even to Madagascar. Their trade connected river basins as distant as those of the Indus, the Euphrates, possibly the Zambezi, the Nile, the Rhône, and the Guadalquivir. They built ships and harbors for the Pharaohs and for Solomon. They transported Egyptian art and Babylonian knowledge to the Greek archipelago, and brought back metals from Spain and Britain. It's no surprise that the prophet bursts into praise as he observes Phoenician enterprise! And on great waters, the seed of Shihor, the harvest of the Nile, was her revenue; and she was the mart of nations.
But upon trade the Phœnicians had built an empire. At home their political life enjoyed the freedom, energy and resources which are supplied by long habits of an extended commerce with other peoples. The constitution of the different Phœnician cities was not, as is sometimes supposed, republican, but monarchical; and the land belonged to the king. Yet the large number of wealthy families at once limited the power of the throne, and saved the commonwealth from being dependent upon the fortunes of a single dynasty. The colonies in close relation with the mother country assured an empire with its life in better circulation and with more reserve of power than either Egypt or[291] Assyria. Tyre and Sidon were frequently overthrown, but they rose again oftener than the other great cities of antiquity, and were still places of importance when Babylon and Nineveh lay in irreparable ruin. Besides their native families of royal wealth and influence and their flourishing colonies, each with its prince, these commercial States kept foreign monarchs in their pay, and sometimes determined the fate of a dynasty. Isaiah entitles Tyre the giver of crowns, the maker of kings, whose merchants are princes, and her traffickers are the honourable of the earth.
But through trade, the Phoenicians built an empire. At home, their political life thrived on the freedom, energy, and resources provided by long-standing commerce with other cultures. The government structure of the various Phoenician cities was not, as is sometimes thought, republican, but monarchical; and the land belonged to the king. However, the presence of many wealthy families limited the king's power and prevented the state from being overly reliant on a single dynasty's fortunes. The colonies closely connected to the homeland ensured an empire with a more vibrant economy and greater stability than either Egypt or [291] Assyria. Tyre and Sidon were often overthrown but bounced back more frequently than other great cities of ancient times, remaining significant even when Babylon and Nineveh lay in irreparable ruin. Along with their native families of royal wealth and influence and their thriving colonies, each with its own ruler, these trade-heavy states also employed foreign monarchs and sometimes influenced the fate of dynasties. Isaiah refers to Tyre as the giver of crowns, the maker of kings, whose merchants are princes, and her traffickers are the honorable of the earth.
But trade with political results so splendid had an evil effect upon the character and spiritual temper of the people. By the indiscriminating ancients the Phœnicians were praised as inventors; the rudiments of most of the arts and sciences, of the alphabet and of money have been ascribed to them. But modern research has proved that of none of the many elements of civilisation which they introduced to the West were they the actual authors. The Phœnicians were simply carriers and middlemen. In all time there is no instance of a nation so wholly given over to buying and selling, who frequented even the battlefields of the world that they might strip the dead and purchase the captive. Phœnician history—though we must always do the people the justice to remember that we have their history only in fragments—affords few signs of the consciousness that there are things which a nation may strive after for their own sake, and not for the money they bring in. The world, which other peoples, still in the reverence of the religious youth of the race, regarded as a house of prayer, the Phœnicians had already turned into a den of thieves. They trafficked even with the mysteries and intelligences; and their own religion[292] is largely a mixture of the religions of the other peoples, with whom they came into contact. The national spirit was venal and mercenary—the heart of an hireling, or, as Isaiah by a baser name describes it, the heart of an harlot. There is not throughout history a more perfect incarnation of the mercenary spirit than the Phœnician nation.
But trade with such impressive political results had a negative effect on the character and spiritual mindset of the people. The ancient thinkers praised the Phoenicians as innovators; the basics of most arts and sciences, the alphabet, and money have been credited to them. However, modern research has shown that they were not the actual creators of the many elements of civilization they brought to the West. The Phoenicians were merely carriers and middlemen. Throughout history, there's no example of a nation so completely devoted to buying and selling, even visiting battlefields to strip the dead and purchase captives. Phoenician history—though we must always remember that we have their history only in fragments—shows few signs of the awareness that there are things a nation can aspire to for their own sake, not just for the money they yield. While other peoples, still young with a sense of reverence, regarded the world as a house of prayer, the Phoenicians had already turned it into a den of thieves. They even traded in mysteries and wisdom; their own religion is largely a blend of the religions of other peoples they encountered. The national spirit was corrupt and money-focused—the heart of a hireling, or, as Isaiah pointed out in less pleasant terms, the heart of an harlot. There’s no better example of the mercenary spirit throughout history than the Phoenician nation.
Now let us turn to the experience of the Jews, whose faith had to face and account for this world-force.
Now let's look at the experience of the Jews, whose faith had to confront and explain this powerful force in the world.
The history of the Jews in Europe has so identified them with trade that it is difficult for us to imagine a Jew free from its spirit or ignorant of its methods. But the fact is that in the time of Isaiah Israel was as little acquainted with commerce as it is possible for a civilised nation to be. Israel's was an inland territory. Till Solomon's reign the people had neither navy nor harbour. Their land was not abundant in materials for trade—it contained almost no minerals, and did not produce a greater supply of food than was necessary for the consumption of its inhabitants. It is true that the ambition of Solomon had brought the people within the temptations of commerce. He established trading cities, annexed harbours and hired a navy. But even then, and again in the reign of Uzziah, which reflects much of Solomon's commercial glory, Israel traded by deputies, and the mass of the people remained innocent of mercantile habits. Perhaps to moderns the most impressive proof of how little Israel had to do with trade is to be found in their laws of money-lending and of interest. The absolute prohibition which Moses placed upon the charging of interest could only have been possible among a people with the most insignificant commerce. To Isaiah himself commerce must have appeared alien. Human life, as he pictures it, is composed of war,[293] politics and agriculture; his ideals for society are those of the shepherd and the farmer. We moderns cannot dissociate the future welfare of humanity from the triumphs of trade.
The history of Jews in Europe has become so intertwined with trade that it's hard for us to picture a Jew who isn't influenced by it or unaware of its practices. However, the truth is that during Isaiah's time, Israel was as clueless about commerce as any civilized nation could be. Israel was landlocked. Until Solomon's reign, the people had no navy or harbor. Their territory didn’t have many resources for trade—it had almost no minerals and produced just enough food for its people. It's true that Solomon's ambition introduced the people to the lure of commerce. He set up trading cities, connected to ports, and built a navy. But even then, and again during Uzziah's reign, which mirrored Solomon's commercial success, Israel traded through agents, and the majority of the population remained untouched by trade practices. Perhaps the most striking evidence of how little Israel engaged in commerce is seen in their laws regarding money-lending and interest. Moses's complete ban on charging interest could only happen among a society with minimal commercial activity. To Isaiah, commerce must have felt foreign. The human experience he describes consists of war, politics, and farming; his visions for society reflect the ideals of shepherds and farmers. Unlike us moderns, who can’t separate the future well-being of humanity from the successes of trade.
I envisioned the world and all the amazing possibilities it would hold;
Witnessed the skies filled with trade, ships with enchanted sails,
"Pilots of the purple dusk, coming down with valuable loads."
But all Isaiah's future is full of gardens and busy fields, of irrigating rivers and canals:—
But all of Isaiah's future is filled with gardens and busy fields, with flowing rivers and canals:—
Until the Spirit be poured upon us from on high, and the wilderness become a fruitful field, and the fruitful field be counted for a forest.... Blessed are ye, that sow beside all waters, that send forth the feet of the ox and the ass.
Until the Spirit is poured out on us from above, and the wilderness turns into a fruitful field, and the fruitful field is considered a forest.... Blessed are you who plant beside all waters, who let the ox and the donkey roam free.
And He shall give the rain of thy seed, that thou shalt sow the ground withal, and bread-corn, the increase of the ground; and it shall be juicy and fat: in that day shall thy cattle feed in large pastures.
He will give rain for your crops so you can plant your fields and harvest grain; the land will produce abundantly, and it will be lush and fertile. On that day, your livestock will graze in spacious pastures.
Conceive how trade looked to eyes which dwelt with enthusiasm upon scenes like these! It must have seemed to blast the future, to disturb the regularity of life with such violence as to shake religion herself! With all our convictions of the benefits of trade, even we feel no greater regret or alarm than when we observe the invasion by the rude forces of trade of some scene of rural felicity: blackening of sky and earth and stream; increasing complexity and entanglement of life; enormous growth of new problems and temptations; strange knowledge, ambitions and passions, that throb through life and strain the tissue of its simple constitution, like novel engines, which shake the ground and the strong walls, accustomed once to re-echo only the simple music of the mill-wheel and the weaver's shuttle. Isaiah did not fear an invasion of Judah by the habits[294] and the machines of trade. There is no foreboding in this chapter of the day when his own people were to take the place of the Phœnicians as the commercial harlots of the world, and a Jew was to be synonymous with usurer and publican. Yet we may employ our feelings to imagine his, and understand what this prophet—seated in the sanctuary of a pastoral and agricultural tribe, with its simple offerings of doves, and lambs and sheaves of corn, telling how their homes, and fields and whole rustic manner of life were subject to God—thought, and feared, and hoped of the vast commerce of Phœnicia, wondering how it also should be sanctified to Jehovah.
Imagine how trade appeared to those who were passionately engaged with scenes like these! It must have felt like it threatened the future, disrupting life’s regularity so intensely that it shook the very foundations of religion itself! Despite our understanding of the benefits of trade, we still feel a sense of regret or alarm when we see the harsh realities of trade invading a peaceful rural setting: darkening the skies, soil, and streams; complicating and entangling life; creating an overwhelming number of new problems and temptations; introducing strange knowledge, ambitions, and passions that pulse through life and stress its simple structure, like new machinery that trembles the ground and sturdy walls that used to resonate only with the gentle sounds of the mill-wheel and the weaver's shuttle. Isaiah did not dread an invasion of Judah by the customs and machines of trade. There is no hint in this chapter of the day when his own people would replace the Phoenicians as the world's commercial *harlots*, with a Jew becoming synonymous with usurer and *publican*. Yet we can use our emotions to picture his, and understand what this prophet—sitting in the heart of a pastoral and agricultural community, with its simple offerings of doves, lambs, and sheaves of corn, showing how their homes, fields, and entire rural way of life were devoted to God—thought about, feared, and hoped for regarding the vast commerce of Phoenicia, wondering how it might also be dedicated to Jehovah.
First of all, Isaiah, as we might have expected from his large faith and broad sympathies, accepts and acknowledges this great world-force. His noble spirit shows neither timidity nor jealousy before it. Before his view what an unblemished prospect of it spreads! His descriptions tell more of his appreciation than long laudations would have done. He grows enthusiastic upon the grandeur of Tyre; and even when he prophesies that Assyria shall destroy it, it is with the feeling that such a destruction is really a desecration, and as if there lived essential glory in great commercial enterprise. Certainly from such a spirit we have much to learn. How often has religion, when brought face to face with the new forces of a generation—commerce, democracy or science—shown either a base timidity or baser jealousy, and met the innovations with cries of detraction or despair! Isaiah reads a lesson to the modern Church in the preliminary spirit with which she should meet the novel experiences of Providence. Whatever judgement may afterwards have to be passed, there is the immediate duty of frankly recognising greatness wherever[295] it may occur. This is an essential principle, from the forgetfulness of which modern religion has suffered much. Nothing is gained by attempting to minimise new departures in the world's history; but everything is lost if we sit down in fear of them. It is a duty we owe to ourselves, and a worship which Providence demands from us, that we ungrudgingly appreciate every magnitude of which history brings us the knowledge.
First of all, Isaiah, as we might expect from his strong faith and wide-ranging compassion, recognizes and embraces this great force in the world. His noble spirit shows neither fear nor envy in its presence. What an unblemished view of it opens up before him! His descriptions reveal more appreciation than long speeches of praise would have done. He becomes enthusiastic about the grandeur of Tyre; and even when he prophesies that Assyria will destroy it, he does so with the feeling that such destruction is truly a tragedy, as if there is essential glory in great commercial ventures. We certainly have much to learn from such a spirit. How often has religion, when confronted by the new forces of a generation—like commerce, democracy, or science—shown either a cowardly timidity or a more shameful jealousy, and responded to innovations with cries of criticism or despair! Isaiah provides a lesson to the modern Church on the open-minded attitude it should adopt when faced with new experiences from Providence. No matter what judgement may need to be made later, the immediate responsibility is to genuinely recognize greatness wherever it appears. This is a crucial principle that modern religion has often forgotten, resulting in significant loss. Nothing is gained by trying to downplay new developments in the world’s history; instead, everything is lost if we allow fear to paralyze us. It is a duty we owe to ourselves, and a form of worship that Providence expects from us, to wholeheartedly appreciate every significant development that history presents us with.
It is almost an unnecessary task to apply Isaiah's meaning to the commerce of our own day. But let us not miss his example in this: that the right to criticise the habits of trade and the ability to criticise them healthily are alone won by a just appreciation of trade's world-wide glory and serviceableness. There is no use preaching against the venal spirit and manifold temptations and degradations of trade, until we have realised the indispensableness of trade and its capacity for disciplining and exalting its ministers. The only way to correct the abuses of "the commercial spirit," against which many in our day are loud with indiscriminate rebuke, is to impress its victims, having first impressed yourself, with the opportunities and the ideals of commerce. A thing is great partly by its traditions and partly by its opportunities—partly by what it has accomplished and partly by the doors of serviceableness of which it holds the key. By either of these standards the magnitude of commerce is simply overwhelming. Having discovered the world-forces, commerce has built thereon the most powerful of our modern empires. Its exigencies compel peace; its resources are the sinews of war. If it has not always preceded religion and science in the conquest of the globe, it has shared with them their triumphs. Commerce has recast the modern world, so that we hardly think of the old national divisions in[296] the greater social classes which have been its direct creation. Commerce determines national policies; its markets are among the schools of statesmen; its merchants are still princes, and its traffickers the honourable of the earth.
It’s almost pointless to try to apply Isaiah's insights to today's commerce. But let's not overlook his example: the right and ability to critique trading practices can only be earned by genuinely recognizing the global significance and usefulness of trade. There’s no point in criticizing the corrupt nature, various temptations, and fallacies of trade until we acknowledge how essential it is and how it can discipline and elevate those involved. The only way to address the shortcomings of “the commercial spirit,” which many people today criticize indiscriminately, is to first understand it yourself and then help others see the possibilities and ideals within commerce. Something is considered great not only by its history but also by its potential—by what it has achieved and by the opportunities it provides. By either standard, the scale of commerce is simply overwhelming. By uncovering global forces, commerce has built some of the strongest modern empires. Its demands promote peace; its resources are vital to warfare. While it hasn’t always led religion and science in global expansion, it has celebrated their victories alongside them. Commerce has reshaped the modern world to the point where we barely consider old national boundaries in light of the larger social classes it has created. Commerce influences national policies; its markets serve as training grounds for leaders; its merchants are still regarded as powerful figures, and its traders are the esteemed members of society.
Therefore let all merchants and their apprentices believe, "Here is something worth putting our manhood into, worth living for, not with our brains only or our appetites, but with our conscience, with our imagination, with every curiosity and sympathy of our nature. Here is a calling with a healthy discipline, with a free spirit, with unrivalled opportunities of service, with an ancient and essential dignity." The reproach which is so largely imagined upon trade is the relic of a barbarous age. Do not tolerate it, for under its shadow, as under other artificial and unhealthy contempts of society, there are apt to grow up those sordid and slavish tempers, which soon make men deserve the reproach that was at first unjustly cast upon them. Dissipate the base influence of this reproach by lifting the imagination upon the antiquity and world-wide opportunities of trade—trade, whose origin, as Isaiah so finely puts it, is of ancient days; and her feet carry her afar off to sojourn.
Therefore, all merchants and their apprentices should believe, "This is something worth investing ourselves in, worth living for, not just with our intellect or desires, but with our conscience, imagination, and all the curiosity and empathy in our nature. This is a profession with a strong discipline, a free spirit, incredible opportunities for service, and a deep-rooted dignity." The stigma often associated with trade is a leftover from a primitive age. Don't accept it, because in its shadow, along with other artificial and unhealthy societal scorn, those unworthy and servile attitudes can develop, leading people to earn the criticism that initially was unfairly directed at them. Erase the negative influence of this stigma by elevating our perspective on the ancient and global opportunities of trade—trade, whose origin, as Isaiah beautifully states, is of ancient days; and her feet carry her afar off to sojourn.
So generous an appreciation of the grandeur of commerce does not prevent Isaiah from exposing its besetting sin and degradation.
So great a recognition of the magnificence of commerce doesn't stop Isaiah from revealing its ongoing flaws and decline.
The vocation of a merchant differs from others in this, that there is no inherent nor instinctive obligation in it to ends higher than those of financial profit—emphasized in our days into the more dangerous constraint of immediate financial profit. No profession is of course absolutely free from the risk of this servitude; but other professions offer escapes, or at least mitigations, which[297] are not possible to nearly the same extent in trade. Artist, artisan, preacher and statesman have ideals which generally act contrary to the compulsion of profit and tend to create a nobility of mind strong enough to defy it. They have given, so to speak, hostages to heaven—ideals of beauty, of accurate scholarship or of moral influence, which they dare not risk by abandoning themselves to the hunt for gain. But the calling of a merchant is not thus safeguarded. It does not afford those visions, those occasions of being caught away to the heavens, which are the inherent glories of other lives. The habits of trade make this the first thought—not what things of beauty are in themselves, not what men are as brothers, not what life is as God's discipline, but what things of beauty, and men and opportunities are worth to us—and in these times what they are immediately worth—as measured by money. In such an absorption art, humanity, morals and religion become matters of growing indifference.
The role of a merchant is different from other professions because there’s no natural or instinctive duty to pursue goals beyond financial gain—now heightened by the push for immediate financial gain. No job is completely free from the risk of falling into this trap, but other professions offer ways to escape or at least lessen this pressure, which[297] isn't as available in trade. Artists, craftsmen, preachers, and politicians have ideals that typically oppose the pressure of profit and can foster a mindset strong enough to resist it. They have essentially committed to higher purposes—ideals of beauty, precise knowledge, or ethical influence—that they wouldn’t risk by focusing solely on making money. But the path of a merchant lacks this protection. It doesn’t provide those visions or moments of transcendence that are the natural rewards of other careers. The nature of trade prioritizes immediate thoughts—not what beauty is in itself, not what it means for people to be connected, not what life represents as a divine journey—but rather what beauty, people, and opportunities are worth to us—and in today’s world, what they are immediately worth in monetary terms. In such a narrow focus, art, humanity, morals, and religion become increasingly irrelevant.
To this spirit, which treats all things and men, high or low, as matters simply of profit, Isaiah gives a very ugly name. We call it the mercenary or venal spirit. Isaiah says it is the spirit of the harlot.
To this spirit, which views everything and everyone, regardless of status, purely in terms of profit, Isaiah gives a very unflattering name. We refer to it as the mercenary or venal spirit. Isaiah calls it the spirit of the harlot.
The history of Phœnicia justified his words. To-day we remember her by nothing that is great, by nothing that is original. She left no art nor literature, and her once brave and skilful populations degenerated till we know them only as the slave-dealers, panders and prostitutes of the Roman empire. If we desire to find Phœnicia's influence on the religion of the world, we have to seek for it among the most sensual of Greek myths and the abominable practices of Corinthian worship. With such terrible literalness was Isaiah's harlot-curse fulfilled.
The history of Phoenicia supports his words. Today, we remember it for nothing great or original. It left behind no art or literature, and its once brave and skilled people declined to the point where we know them only as the slave traders, pimps, and prostitutes of the Roman Empire. If we want to find Phoenicia's influence on the world's religions, we have to look among the most indulgent Greek myths and the disgusting practices of Corinthian worship. Isaiah's curse of promiscuity was fulfilled in such a literal way.
What is true of Phœnicia may become true of Britain,[298] and what has been seen on the large scale of a nation is exemplified every day in individual lives. The man who is entirely eaten up with the zeal of gain is no better than what Isaiah called Tyre. He has prostituted himself to covetousness. If day and night our thoughts are of profit, and the habit, so easily engendered in these times, of asking only, "What can I make of this?" is allowed to grow upon us, it shall surely come to pass that we are found sacrificing, like the poor unfortunate, the most sacred of our endowments and affections for gain, demeaning our natures at the feet of the world for the sake of the world's gold. A woman sacrifices her purity for coin, and the world casts her out. But some who would not touch her have sacrificed honour and love and pity for the same base wage, and in God's sight are no better than she. Ah, how much need is there for these bold, brutal standards of the Hebrew prophet to correct our own social misappreciations!
What happened to Phœnicia could easily happen to Britain,[298] and what we see on a national level is reflected in our everyday lives. A man consumed by the pursuit of profit is no better than what Isaiah described as Tyre. He has sold himself to greed. If we constantly think about profit, and let the habit of asking only, "What can I get out of this?" take hold, we will inevitably end up sacrificing, like the unfortunate, the most sacred parts of ourselves and our affections for gain, degrading our nature at the feet of the world for the sake of its wealth. A woman sacrifices her purity for money, and society rejects her. But some who wouldn't even acknowledge her have sacrificed their honor, love, and compassion for the same low pay, and in God's eyes, they are no better than she is. Oh, how desperately we need the bold, harsh standards of the Hebrew prophet to correct our social misunderstandings!
Now for a very vain delusion upon this subject! It is often imagined in our day that if a man seek atonement for the venal spirit through the study of art, through the practice of philanthropy or through the cultivation of religion, he shall surely find it. This is false—plausible and often practised but utterly false. Unless a man see and reverence beauty in the very workshop and office of his business, unless he feel those whom he meets there, his employés and customers, as his brethren, unless he keep his business methods free from fraud, and honestly recognise his gains as a trust from the Lord, then no amount of devotion elsewhere to the fine arts, nor perseverance in philanthropy, nor fondness for the Church evinced by ever so large subscriptions, will deliver him from the devil of mercenariness. That is a plea of alibi that shall[299] not prevail on the judgement day. He is only living a double life, whereof his art, philanthropy or religion is the occasional and dilettante portion, with not nearly so much influence on his character as the other, his calling and business, in which he still sacrifices love to gain. His real world—the world in which God set him, to buy and sell indeed, but also to serve and glorify his God—he is treating only as a big warehouse and exchange. And so much is this the case at the present day, in spite of all the worship of art and religion which is fashionable in mercantile circles, that we do not go too far when we say that if Jesus were now to visit our large markets and manufactories, in which the close intercourse of numbers of human persons renders the opportunities of service and testimony to God so frequent, He would scourge men from them, as He scourged the traffickers of the Temple, for that they had forgotten that here was their Father's house, where their brethren had to be owned and helped, and their Father's glory revealed to the world.
Now for a really vain delusion about this topic! People often believe today that if someone seeks redemption for their selfish nature through art, philanthropy, or religion, they'll definitely find it. This is false—seems plausible and is often practiced but is completely untrue. Unless a person sees and appreciates beauty in their everyday work, feels a sense of brotherhood with their colleagues and customers, keeps their business practices honest, and recognizes their profits as a responsibility from God, then no amount of dedication to the arts, philanthropy, or generous donations to the Church will free them from the trap of greed. That’s just an excuse that won’t hold up on judgment day. They’re living a double life, where art, philanthropy, or religion is just a casual interest and has far less influence on their character than their main work, where they still prioritize profit over love. Their real world—the one where God placed them, to buy and sell, but also to serve and honor God—is treated like a huge warehouse or trading post. This is so true today, despite the widespread appreciation for art and religion in business circles, that we can confidently say if Jesus were to visit our large markets and factories, where close interactions among many people provide countless chances to serve and witness for God, He would drive people out, just as He did with the merchants in the Temple, because they had forgotten that this is where their Father’s house is, where they must acknowledge and support their brothers and reveal their Father’s glory to the world.
A nation with such a spirit was of course foredoomed to destruction. Isaiah predicts the absolute disappearance of Tyre from the attention of the world. Tyre shall be forgotten seventy years. Then, like some poor unfortunate whose day of beauty is past, she shall in vain practise her old advertisements on men. After the end of seventy years it shall be unto Tyre as in the song of the harlot: Take an harp, go about the city, thou harlot that hast been forgotten; make sweet melody, sing many songs, that thou mayest be remembered.
A nation with that kind of spirit was definitely bound for destruction. Isaiah predicts that Tyre will completely fade from the world's attention. Tyre will be forgotten for seventy years. Then, like someone whose beauty has faded, she will try in vain to promote herself to people again. After the seventy years are up, it will be for Tyre like in the song of the harlot: Take a harp, go around the city, you forgotten harlot; make sweet music, sing many songs, so that you can be remembered.
But Commerce is essential to the world. Tyre must revive; and the prophet sees her revive as the minister of Religion, the purveyor of the food of the servants of the Lord, and of the accessories of their worship. It[300] must be confessed, that we are not a little shocked when we find Isaiah continuing to apply to Commerce his metaphor of a harlot, even after Commerce has entered the service of the true religion. He speaks of her wages being devoted to Jehovah, just in the same manner as those of certain notorious women of heathen temples were devoted to the idol of the temple. This is even against the directions of the Mosaic law. Isaiah, however, was a poet; and in his flights we must not expect him to carry the whole Law on his back. He was a poet, and probably no analogy would have more vividly appealed to his Oriental audience. It will be foolish to allow our natural prejudice against what we may feel to be the unhealthiness of the metaphor to blind us to the magnificence of the thought which he clothes in it.
But commerce is essential to the world. Tyre must come back; and the prophet sees it revive as a minister of religion, providing food for the servants of the Lord and the things they need for their worship. It[300] has to be acknowledged that we are somewhat shocked when we find Isaiah continuing to refer to commerce with his metaphor of a harlot, even after commerce has joined the service of true religion. He talks about her earnings being dedicated to Jehovah, just like those of certain infamous women in pagan temples who dedicated their earnings to the temple idol. This is even against the guidelines of the Mosaic law. However, Isaiah was a poet, and we shouldn't expect him to carry the entire Law in his poetry. He was a poet, and probably no analogy would resonate more forcefully with his Eastern audience. It would be unwise to let our natural bias against what we might perceive as the unhealthy nature of the metaphor blind us to the greatness of the idea he expresses through it.
All this is another proof of the sanity and far sight of our prophet. Again we find that his conviction that judgement is coming does not render his spirit morbid, nor disturb his eye for things of beauty and profit in the world. Commerce, with all her faults, is essential, and must endure, nay shall prove in the days to come Religion's most profitable minister. The generosity and wisdom of this passage are the more striking when we remember the extremity of unrelieved denunciation to which other great teachers of religion have allowed themselves to be hurled by their rage against the sins of trade. But Isaiah, in the largest sense of the expression, is a man of the world—a man of the world because God made the world and rules it. Yet even from his far sight was hidden the length to which in the last days Commerce would carry her services to man and God, proving as she has done, under the flag of another Phœnicia, to all the extent of Isaiah's longing, one of Religion's most sincere and profitable handmaids.
All of this is further proof of our prophet's wisdom and insight. Once again, we see that his belief in impending judgment doesn't make him pessimistic, nor does it cloud his appreciation for beauty and value in the world. Commerce, despite its flaws, is essential and will endure; it will even become, in the future, Religion's most beneficial ally. The generosity and wisdom in this passage stand out even more when we consider how other great religious leaders have often succumbed to anger and harshly criticized the sins of trade. But Isaiah, in the broadest sense, is a worldly person—worldly because God created and governs the world. Yet even he couldn't foresee just how far Commerce would go to serve humanity and God in the end days, ultimately showing, under the banner of a new Phoenicia, that it can be one of Religion's most genuine and valuable supporters.
BOOK IV.
JERUSALEM AND SENNACHERIB, 701 B.C.
Isaiah:— | |
xxxvi. 1. | Early in 701. |
i. | " " |
xxii. | " " |
xxxiii. | A little later. |
xxxvi. 2-xxxvii. | " " |
—— | —— |
xxxviii.-xxxix. | Date uncertain. |
BOOK IV.
Into this fourth book we put all the rest of the prophecies of the Book of Isaiah, that have to do with the prophet's own time: chaps. i., xxii. and xxxiii., with the narrative in xxxvi., xxxvii. All these refer to the only Assyrian invasion of Judah and siege of Jerusalem: that undertaken by Sennacherib in 701.
Into this fourth book, we include all the remaining prophecies from the Book of Isaiah that pertain to the prophet's own time: chapters 1, 22, and 33, along with the accounts in 36 and 37. All of these relate to the Assyrian invasion of Judah and the siege of Jerusalem carried out by Sennacherib in 701.
It is, however, right to remember once more, that many authorities maintain that there were two Assyrian invasions of Judah—one by Sargon in 711, the other by Sennacherib in 701—and that chaps. i. and xxii. (as well as x. 5-34) belong to the former of these. The theory is ingenious and tempting; but, in the silence of the Assyrian annals about any invasion of Judah by Sargon, it is impossible to adopt it. And although chaps. i. and xxii. differ very greatly in tone from chap. xxxiii., yet to account for the difference it is not necessary to suppose two different invasions, with a considerable period between them. Virtually, as will appear in the course of our exposition, Sennacherib's invasion of Judah was a double one.
It’s important to remember that many experts believe there were two Assyrian invasions of Judah—one by Sargon in 711 and the other by Sennacherib in 701—and that chapters i. and xxii. (as well as x. 5-34) are related to the first invasion. This theory is clever and appealing, but because the Assyrian records don’t mention any invasion of Judah by Sargon, we can’t accept it as fact. Even though chapters i. and xxii. have a very different tone from chapter xxxiii., we don’t need to assume there were two separate invasions spaced apart to explain the difference. As we’ll discuss in our analysis, Sennacherib’s invasion of Judah was essentially a double invasion.
1. The first time Sennacherib's army invaded Judah they took all the fenced cities, and probably invested Jerusalem, but withdrew on payment of tribute and the surrender of the casus belli, the Assyrian vassal Padi, whom the Ekronites had deposed and given over to the[304] keeping of Hezekiah. To this invasion refer Isa. i., xxii. and the first verse of xxxvi.: Now it came to pass in the fourteenth[53] year of King Hezekiah that Sennacherib, King of Assyria, came up against all the fenced cities of Judah and took them. This verse is the same as 2 Kings xviii. 13, to which, however, there is added in vv. 14-16 an account of the tribute sent by Hezekiah to Sennacherib at Lachish, that is not included in the narrative in Isaiah. Compare 2 Chron. xxxii. 1.
1. The first time Sennacherib's army invaded Judah, they captured all the fortified cities and likely besieged Jerusalem, but pulled back after receiving tribute and handing over Padi, the Assyrian vassal who had been deposed by the Ekronites and given to Hezekiah's control. This invasion is referenced in Isaiah chapters 1, 22, and the first verse of 36: Now it happened in the fourteenth[53] year of King Hezekiah that Sennacherib, King of Assyria, marched against all the fortified cities of Judah and seized them. This verse matches 2 Kings 18:13, but 2 Kings adds details in verses 14-16 about the tribute Hezekiah sent to Sennacherib at Lachish, which isn't included in the account in Isaiah. See also 2 Chronicles 32:1.
2. But scarcely had the tribute been paid when Sennacherib, himself advancing to meet Egypt, sent back upon Jerusalem a second army of investment, with which was the Rabshakeh; and this was the army that so mysteriously disappeared from the eyes of the besieged. To the treacherous return of the Assyrians and the sudden deliverance of Jerusalem from their grasp refer Isa. xxxiii., xxxvi. 2-xxxvii., with the fuller and evidently original narrative in 2 Kings xviii. 17-xix. Compare 2 Chron. xxxii. 9-23.
2. But hardly had the tribute been paid when Sennacherib, who was on his way to confront Egypt, sent back a second army to surround Jerusalem, which included the Rabshakeh; and this was the army that mysteriously vanished from the sight of those inside the city. For details on the treacherous return of the Assyrians and the sudden rescue of Jerusalem from their control, see Isaiah 33, 36:2-37, with the more detailed and evidently original account in 2 Kings 18:17-19. Compare 2 Chronicles 32:9-23.
To the history of this double attempt upon Jerusalem in 701—xxxvi. and xxxvii.—there has been appended in xxxviii. and xxxix. an account of Hezekiah's illness and of an embassy to him from Babylon. These events probably happened some years before Sennacherib's invasion. But it will be most convenient for us to take[305] them in the order in which they stand in the canon. They will naturally lead us up to a question that it is necessary we should discuss before taking leave of Isaiah—whether this great prophet of the endurance of the kingdom of God upon earth had any gospel for the individual who dropped away from it into death.
To the history of this double attempt on Jerusalem in 701—xxxvi. and xxxvii.—there's an account of Hezekiah's illness and an embassy from Babylon in xxxviii. and xxxix. These events probably took place a few years before Sennacherib's invasion. However, it makes sense for us to address them in the order they appear in the canon. They will naturally lead us to a question we need to discuss before we conclude our examination of Isaiah—did this great prophet, who spoke of the kingdom of God enduring on earth, have any message for the individual who falls away from it into death?
CHAPTER XIX.
AT THE LOWEST EBB.
Isaiah i. and xxii. (701 B.C.).
Isaiah 1 and 22 (701 B.C.).
In the drama of Isaiah's life we have now arrived at the final act—a short and sharp one of a few months. The time is 701 B.C., the fortieth year of Isaiah's ministry, and about the twenty-sixth of Hezekiah's reign. The background is the invasion of Palestine by Sennacherib. The stage itself is the city of Jerusalem. In the clear atmosphere before the bursting of the storm Isaiah has looked round the whole world—his world—uttering oracles on the nations from Tyre to Egypt and from Ethiopia to Babylon. But now the Assyrian storm has burst, and all except the immediate neighbourhood of the prophet is obscured. From Jerusalem Isaiah will not again lift his eyes.
In the story of Isaiah's life, we've now reached the final act—brief and intense, lasting just a few months. It’s 701 BCE, during the fortieth year of Isaiah's ministry and about the twenty-sixth year of Hezekiah's reign. The backdrop is the invasion of Palestine by Sennacherib. The setting is the city of Jerusalem. In the clear sky before the storm hits, Isaiah has surveyed his world—prophesying about nations from Tyre to Egypt and from Ethiopia to Babylon. But now the Assyrian threat has arrived, and everything beyond the prophet’s immediate surroundings is clouded. Isaiah will no longer lift his eyes from Jerusalem.
The stage is thus narrow and the time short, but the action one of the most critical in the history of Israel, taking rank with the Exodus from Egypt and the Return from Babylon. To Isaiah himself it marks the summit of his career. For half a century Zion has been preparing for, forgetting and again preparing for, her first and final struggle with the Assyrian. Now she is to meet her foe, face to face across her own walls. For forty years Isaiah has predicted for the Assyrian an[307] uninterrupted path of conquest to the very gates of Jerusalem, but certain check and confusion there. Sennacherib has overrun the world, and leaps upon Zion. The Jewish nation await their fate, Isaiah his vindication, and the credit of Israel's religion, one of the most extraordinary tests to which a spiritual faith was ever subjected.
The stage is narrow and time is short, but the action is one of the most critical in Israel's history, ranking alongside the Exodus from Egypt and the Return from Babylon. For Isaiah, this marks the peak of his career. For half a century, Zion has been preparing for, forgetting, and then re-preparing for her first and final struggle with the Assyrian. Now she is about to confront her enemy, face to face across her own walls. For forty years, Isaiah has predicted an uninterrupted path of conquest for the Assyrian right to the gates of Jerusalem, but he also foretold some setbacks and confusion there. Sennacherib has taken over the world and is now attacking Zion. The Jewish nation awaits their fate, Isaiah anticipates his vindication, and the integrity of Israel's religion faces one of the most extraordinary tests any spiritual faith has ever encountered.
In the end, by the mysterious disappearance of the Assyrian, Jerusalem was saved, the prophet was left with his remnant and the future still open for Israel. But at the beginning of the end such an issue was by no means probable. Jewish panic and profligacy almost prevented the Divine purpose, and Isaiah went near to breaking his heart over the city, for whose redemption he had travailed for a lifetime. He was as sure as ever that this redemption must come, but a collapse of the people's faith and patriotism at the eleventh hour made its coming seem worthless. Jerusalem appeared bent on forestalling her deliverance by moral suicide. Despair, not of God but of the city, settled on Isaiah's heart; and in such a mood he wrote chap. xxii. We may entitle it therefore, though written at a time when the tide should have been running to the full, "At the Lowest Ebb."
In the end, through the mysterious disappearance of the Assyrian, Jerusalem was saved, the prophet was left with his remnant, and the future for Israel remained open. However, at the beginning of the end, such an outcome seemed highly unlikely. Jewish panic and reckless behavior nearly thwarted the Divine plan, and Isaiah came close to breaking his heart over the city he had dedicated his life to redeeming. He was as convinced as ever that this redemption would happen, but a collapse of the people's faith and patriotism at the last minute made its arrival feel meaningless. Jerusalem seemed determined to sabotage her own salvation through moral failure. Despair, not regarding God but concerning the city, weighed heavily on Isaiah's heart; in this state of mind, he wrote chap. xxii. We can therefore title it, even though it was written when the tide should have been at its highest, "At the Lowest Ebb."
We have thus stated at the outset the motive of this chapter, because it is one of the most unexpected and startling of all Isaiah's prophecies. In it "we can discern precipices." Beneath our eyes, long lifted by the prophet to behold a future stretching very far forth, this chapter suddenly yawns, a pit of blackness. For utterness of despair and the absolute sentence which it passes on the citizens of Zion we have had nothing like it from Isaiah since the evil days of Ahaz. The historical portions of the Bible which cover this period are not cleft[308] by such a crevasse, and of course the official Assyrian annals, full as they are of the details of Sennacherib's campaign in Palestine, know nothing of the moral condition of Jerusalem.[54] Yet if we put the Hebrew and Assyrian narratives together, and compare them with chaps. i. and xxii. of Isaiah, we may be sure that the following was something like the course of events which led down to this woeful depth in Judah's experience.
We have stated at the beginning the purpose of this chapter because it is one of the most surprising and shocking of all Isaiah's prophecies. In it, "we can see precipices." Before our eyes, which the prophet has raised to look at a future stretching very far forth, this chapter suddenly reveals a pit of darkness. For sheer despair and the harsh judgment it delivers on the people of Zion, we haven't seen anything like it from Isaiah since the troubled times of Ahaz. The historical parts of the Bible that cover this period don't show such a gap, and of course, the official Assyrian records, filled with details about Sennacherib's campaign in Palestine, say nothing about the moral state of Jerusalem.[54] Yet if we combine the Hebrew and Assyrian accounts and compare them with chapters i. and xxii. of Isaiah, we can be confident that the following was roughly the sequence of events that led to this tragic low in Judah's experience.
In a Syrian campaign Sennacherib's path was plain—to begin with the Phœnician cities, march quickly south by the level coastland, subduing the petty chieftains upon it, meet Egypt at its southern end, and then, when he had rid himself of his only formidable foe, turn to the more delicate task of warfare among the hills of Judah—a campaign which he could scarcely undertake with a hostile force like Egypt on his flank. This course, he tells us, he followed. "In my third campaign, to the land of Syria I went. Luliah (Elulæus), King of Sidon—for the fearful splendour of my majesty overwhelmed him—fled to a distant spot in the midst of the sea. His land I entered." City after city fell to the invader. The princes of Aradus, Byblus and Ashdod, by the coast, and even Moab and Edom, far inland, sent him their submission. He attacked Ascalon, and captured its king. He went on, and took the Philistine cities of Beth-dagon, Joppa, Barka and Azor, all of them within forty miles of Jerusalem, and some even visible from her neighbourhood. South of this group, and a little over twenty-five miles from Jerusalem, lay Ekron; and[309] here Sennacherib had so good a reason for anger, that the inhabitants, expecting no mercy at his hands, prepared a stubborn defence.
In his campaign in Syria, Sennacherib had a clear plan—to start with the Phoenician cities, quickly move south along the flat coastline, conquer the local leaders there, meet Egypt at its southern border, and then, once he had eliminated his main rival, tackle the more challenging task of fighting in the hilly region of Judah—a campaign he couldn't really begin with a hostile Egypt nearby. He states that he followed this strategy. "In my third campaign, I went to the land of Syria. Luliah (Elulæus), King of Sidon—overwhelmed by the terrifying grandeur of my majesty—fled to a faraway place in the sea. I entered his territory." One city after another fell to the invader. The princes of Aradus, Byblus, and Ashdod along the coast, as well as Moab and Edom further inland, submitted to him. He attacked Ascalon and captured its king. Then, he moved on and took the Philistine cities of Beth-dagon, Joppa, Barka, and Azor, all within forty miles of Jerusalem, with some even being visible from nearby. Just south of these cities, a little over twenty-five miles from Jerusalem, lay Ekron; and here Sennacherib had plenty of reason to be angry, as the residents, fearing no mercy from him, prepared for a fierce defense.
Ten years before this Sargon had set Padi, a vassal of his own, as king over Ekron; but the Ekronites had risen against Padi, put him in chains, and sent him to their ally Hezekiah, who now held him in Jerusalem. "These men," says Sennacherib, "were now terrified in their hearts; the shadows of death overwhelmed them."[55] Before Ekron was reduced, however, the Egyptian army arrived in Philistia, and Sennacherib had to abandon the siege for these arch-enemies. He defeated them in the neighbourhood, at Eltekeh, returned to Ekron, and completed its siege. Then, while he himself advanced southwards in pursuit of the Egyptians, he detached a corps, which, marching eastwards through the mountain passes, overran all Judah and threatened Jerusalem. "And Hezekiah, King of Judah, who had not bowed down at my feet, forty-six of his strong cities, his castles and the smaller towns in their neighbourhood beyond number, by casting down ramparts and by open attack, by battle—zuk, of the feet; nisi, hewing to pieces and casting down (?)—I besieged, I captured.... He himself, like a bird in a cage, inside Jerusalem, his royal city, I shut him up; siege-towers against him I constructed, for he had given command to renew the bulwarks of the great gate of his city."[56] But Sennacherib does not say that he took Jerusalem, and simply closes the narrative of his campaign with the account of large tribute which Hezekiah sent after him to Nineveh.
Ten years before this, Sargon had appointed Padi, one of his own vassals, as king over Ekron. However, the people of Ekron revolted against Padi, captured him, and sent him in chains to their ally Hezekiah, who was keeping him in Jerusalem. "These men," says Sennacherib, "were now terrified in their hearts; the shadows of death overwhelmed them." [55] Before Ekron was conquered, though, the Egyptian army arrived in Philistia, forcing Sennacherib to abandon the siege due to these arch-enemies. He defeated them nearby at Eltekeh, returned to Ekron, and finished the siege. Then, while he personally pursued the Egyptians southward, he sent a division moving east through the mountain passes, invading all of Judah and threatening Jerusalem. "And Hezekiah, King of Judah, who had not submitted to me, I besieged forty-six of his fortified cities, his castles, and countless smaller towns by breaking down walls and through open combat—zuk, of the feet; nisi, hacking apart and demolishing (?)—I captured.... He himself, like a bird in a cage, I confined inside Jerusalem, his royal city; I built siege towers against him since he had ordered the restoration of the fortifications of the great gate of his city." [56] However, Sennacherib doesn't claim to have taken Jerusalem and simply concludes his campaign narrative with an account of the large tribute Hezekiah sent him in Nineveh.
Here, then, we have material for a graphic picture of Jerusalem and her populace, when chaps. i. and xxii. were uttered by Isaiah.
Here, then, we have the material for a vivid depiction of Jerusalem and its people when chapters i. and xxii. were spoken by Isaiah.
At Jerusalem we are within a day's journey of any part of the territory of Judah. We feel the kingdom throb to its centre at Assyria's first footfall on the border. The nation's life is shuddering in upon its capital, couriers dashing up with the first news; fugitives hard upon them; palace, arsenal, market and temple thrown into commotion; the politicians busy; the engineers hard at work completing the fortifications, leading the suburban wells to a reservoir within the walls, levelling every house and tree outside which could give shelter to the besiegers, and heaping up the material on the ramparts, till there lies nothing but a great, bare, waterless circle round a high-banked fortress. Across this bareness the lines of fugitives streaming to the gates; provincial officials and their retinues; soldiers whom Hezekiah had sent out to meet the foe, returning without even the dignity of defeat upon them; husbandmen, with cattle and remnants of grain in disorder; women and children; the knaves, cowards and helpless of the whole kingdom pouring their fear, dissoluteness and disease into the already-unsettled populace of Jerusalem. Inside the walls opposing political factions and a weak king; idle crowds, swaying to every rumour and intrigue; the ordinary restraints and regularities of life suspended, even patriotism gone with counsel and courage, but in their place fear and shame and greed of life. Such was the state in which Jerusalem faced the hour of her visitation.
At Jerusalem, we are just a day's journey from anywhere in Judah. We can feel the kingdom react intensely as Assyria first steps onto the border. The country's life is pulling back toward its capital, with messengers rushing in with the first news; refugees close behind them; the palace, armory, marketplace, and temple thrown into chaos; politicians are busy; engineers are hard at work finishing the fortifications, directing the suburban wells to a reservoir inside the walls, leveling every house and tree outside that could shield the attackers, and piling up the materials on the ramparts, until there’s nothing left but a vast, empty, waterless area surrounding a heavily fortified structure. Amid this emptiness, lines of refugees flow to the gates—provincial officials and their followers; soldiers that Hezekiah had sent out to confront the enemy, returning without even the dignity of defeat; farmers, with livestock and leftover grain in disarray; women and children; the dishonest, cowards, and helpless of the entire kingdom flooding their fear, lawlessness, and sickness into the already-frayed population of Jerusalem. Inside the walls are conflicting political groups and a weak king; idle crowds swaying with every rumor and scheme; the usual rules and rhythms of life suspended, even patriotism evaporating with wisdom and courage, leaving only fear, shame, and the desperation to survive. That was the state in which Jerusalem confronted the moment of its trial.
Gradually the Visitant came near over the thirty miles which lay between the capital and the border.[311] Signs of the Assyrian advance were given in the sky, and night after night the watchers on Mount Zion, seeing the glare in the west, must have speculated which of the cities of Judah was being burned. Clouds of smoke across the heavens from prairie and forest fires told how war, even if it passed, would leave a trail of famine; and men thought with breaking hearts of the villages and fields, heritage of the tribes of old, that were now bare to the foot and the fire of the foreigner. Your country is desolate; your cities are burned with fire; your land, strangers devour it in your presence, and it is desolate as the overthrow of strangers. And the daughter of Zion is left as a booth in a vineyard, as a lodge in a garden of cucumbers. Except Jehovah of hosts had left unto us a very small remnant, we should have been as Sodom, we should have been like unto Gomorrah.[57] Then came touch of the enemy, the appearance of armed bands, vistas down Jerusalem's favourite valleys of chariots, squadrons of horsemen emerging upon the plateaus to north and west of the city, heavy siege-towers and swarms of men innumerable. And Elam bare the quiver, with troops of men and horsemen; and Kir uncovered the shield. At last they saw their fears of fifty years face to face! Far-away names were standing by their gates, actual bowmen and flashing shields! As Jerusalem gazed upon the terrible Assyrian armaments, how many of her inhabitants remembered Isaiah's words delivered a generation before!—Behold, they shall come with speed swiftly; none shall be weary or stumble among them; neither shall the string of their loins be lax nor the latchet of their shoes be broken; whose arrows[312] are sharp, and all their bows bent; their horses' hoofs shall be counted like flint, and their wheels like a whirlwind; their roaring shall be like a lion: they shall roar like young lions. For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still.
Gradually, the Visitor approached the thirty miles that lay between the capital and the border.[311] Signs of the Assyrian advance were visible in the sky, and night after night, the watchers on Mount Zion, seeing the glow in the west, must have wondered which city of Judah was burning. Clouds of smoke across the sky from prairie and forest fires showed that war, even if it moved on, would leave behind a path of famine; and people thought, with heavy hearts, of the villages and fields, the heritage of the old tribes, that were now vulnerable to the enemy's invasion. Your country is in ruins; your cities are burning; strangers are devouring your land in your presence, and it is as desolate as the destruction of foreigners. And the daughter of Zion is left like a shelter in a vineyard, like a hut in a cucumber garden. Unless the Lord of hosts had left us a small remnant, we would have been like Sodom, we would have been like Gomorrah.[57] Then came the touch of the enemy, the appearance of armed groups, views down Jerusalem's favorite valleys filled with chariots, troops of horsemen emerging on the plateaus to the north and west of the city, heavy siege towers, and countless soldiers. And Elam had the quiver, with troops of men and horsemen; and Kir uncovered the shield. At last, they faced their fears of fifty years! Distant names were standing at their gates, real archers and shining shields! As Jerusalem looked upon the terrifying Assyrian forces, how many of its residents remembered Isaiah's words delivered a generation earlier! —Behold, they shall come swiftly; none shall be weary or stumble among them; neither shall the string of their loins be loose nor the strap of their shoes be broken; whose arrows[312] are sharp, and all their bows are bent; their horses' hooves shall be like flint, and their wheels like a whirlwind; their roaring shall be like that of a lion: they shall roar like young lions. For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is still stretched out.
There were, however, two supports, on which that distracted populace within the walls still steadied themselves. The one was the Temple-worship, the other the Egyptian alliance.
There were, however, two supports on which that distracted crowd inside the walls still held on. One was the Temple worship, and the other was the alliance with Egypt.
History has many remarkable instances of peoples betaking themselves in the hour of calamity to the energetic discharge of the public rites of religion. But such a resort is seldom, if ever, a real moral conversion. It is merely physical nervousness, apprehension for life, clutching at the one thing within reach that feels solid, which it abandons as soon as panic has passed. When the crowds in Jerusalem betook themselves to the Temple, with unwonted wealth of sacrifice, Isaiah denounced this as hypocrisy and futility. To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto Me? saith Jehovah.... I am weary to bear them. And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide Mine eyes from you; yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear (i. 11-15).
History has many remarkable examples of people turning to the active practice of religion in times of crisis. However, this response rarely leads to a genuine moral change. It's simply a reaction driven by physical tension, fear for survival, and grabbing onto the one thing that seems reliable, which is quickly let go of once the panic subsides. When the crowds in Jerusalem flocked to the Temple, offering an abundance of sacrifices, Isaiah called this out as hypocrisy and meaningless. “What’s the point of all your sacrifices to Me?” says the Lord.... “I’m tired of them. And when you raise your hands, I’ll ignore you; even when you say many prayers, I won’t listen.” (i. 11-15).
Isaiah might have spared his scornful orders to the people to desist from worship. Soon afterwards they abandoned it of their own will, but from motives very different from those urged by him. The second support to which Jerusalem clung was the Egyptian alliance—the pet project of the party then in power. They had carried it to a successful issue, taunting Isaiah with their success.[58] He had continued to[313] denounce it, and now the hour was approaching when their cleverness and confidence were to be put to the test. It was known in Jerusalem that an Egyptian army was advancing to Sennacherib, and politicians and people awaited the encounter with anxiety.
Isaiah might have held back his sarcastic orders to the people to stop worshiping. Not long after, they quit on their own, but for reasons very different from what he had suggested. The second thing Jerusalem relied on was the alliance with Egypt—the favored plan of the ruling party at the time. They had achieved it and mocked Isaiah for their success.[58] He had kept criticizing it, and now the moment was nearing when their cleverness and confidence would be tested. It was known in Jerusalem that an Egyptian army was advancing towards Sennacherib, and both politicians and citizens awaited the clash with worry.
We are aware what happened. Egypt was beaten at Eltekeh; the alliance was stamped a failure; Jerusalem's last worldly hope was taken from her. When the news reached the city, something took place, of which our moral judgement tells us more than any actual record of facts. The Government of Hezekiah gave way; the rulers, whose courage and patriotism had been identified with the Egyptian alliance, lost all hope for their country, and fled, as Isaiah puts it, en masse (xxii. 3). There was no battle, no defeat at arms (id. 2, 3); but the Jewish State collapsed.
We know what happened. Egypt was defeated at Eltekeh; the alliance was deemed a failure; Jerusalem's last earthly hope was taken away. When the news reached the city, something happened that our moral judgment tells us is more significant than any actual record of events. The government of Hezekiah fell apart; the leaders, who had linked their courage and patriotism to the Egyptian alliance, lost all hope for their nation and fled, as Isaiah puts it, en masse (xxii. 3). There was no battle, no defeat in combat (id. 2, 3); but the Jewish state crumbled.
Then, when the last material hope of Judah fell, fell her religion too. The Egyptian disappointment, while it drove the rulers out of their false policies, drove the people out of their unreal worship. What had been a city of devotees became in a moment a city of revellers. Formerly all had been sacrifices and worship, but now feasting and blasphemy. Behold, joy and gladness, slaying oxen and killing sheep, eating flesh and drinking wine: Let us eat and drink, for to-morrow we die (id. 13. The reference of ver. 12 is probably to chap. i.).
Then, when Judah's last hope fell apart, her religion did too. The disappointment from Egypt drove the leaders away from their false beliefs and the people away from their insincere worship. What was once a city of devotion instantly turned into a city of revelry. Where there had been sacrifices and worship, now there was feasting and blasphemy. Look, joy and gladness, slaughtering oxen and killing sheep, eating meat and drinking wine: Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die (id. 13. The reference of ver. 12 is probably to chap. i.).
Now all Isaiah's ministry had been directed just against these two things: the Egyptian alliance and the purely formal observance of religion—trust in the world and trust in religiousness. And together both of these had given way, and the Assyrian was at the gates. Truly it was the hour of Isaiah's vindication. Yet—and this is the tragedy—it had come too late. The prophet could not use it. The two things he said[314] would collapse had collapsed, but for the people there seemed now no help to be justified from the thing which he said would remain. What was the use of the city's deliverance, when the people themselves had failed! The feelings of triumph, which the prophet might have expressed, were swallowed up in unselfish grief over the fate of his wayward and abandoned Jerusalem.
Now all of Isaiah's ministry focused on just these two things: the alliance with Egypt and the superficial practice of religion—trusting in the world and trusting in religious rituals. And both of these had failed, leaving the Assyrian army at the gates. It was truly the moment for Isaiah to be proven right. Yet—and this is the tragedy—it came too late. The prophet could not take advantage of it. The two things he had warned would collapse had indeed collapsed, but for the people, it seemed there was no hope left in what he said would endure. What good was the city's salvation when the people themselves had failed? The feelings of triumph that the prophet might have expressed were overwhelmed by selfless sorrow for the fate of his wayward and forsaken Jerusalem.
What aileth thee now—and in these words we can hear the old man addressing his fickle child, whose changefulness by this time he knew so well—what aileth thee now that thou art wholly gone up to the housetops—we see him standing at his door watching this ghastly holiday—O thou that art full of shoutings, a tumultuous city, a joyous town? What are you rejoicing at in such an hour as this, when you have not even the bravery of your soldiers to celebrate, when you are without that pride which has brought songs from the lips of a defeated people as they learned that their sons had fallen with their faces to the foe, and has made even the wounds of the dead borne through the gate lips of triumph, calling to festival! For thy slain are not slain with the sword, neither are they dead in battle.
What's wrong with you now—and in these words we can hear the old man talking to his unpredictable child, whose changes by now he knew all too well—what’s bothering you now that you’ve completely taken to the rooftops—we see him standing at his door, watching this eerie celebration—O you who are full of noise, a chaotic city, a happy town? What are you celebrating at a time like this, when you don’t even have the bravery of your soldiers to honor, when you are lacking that pride that has made defeated people sing when they learned that their sons fell facing the enemy, and has turned even the wounds of the dead carried through the gate into expressions of victory, calling out for a celebration! For your slain are not killed by the sword, nor did they die in battle.
Without a bow, they were taken:
All your belongings that were found were collected in piles;
They had run from far away.
So I say, Look away from me;
Let me make bitterness even more painful by crying.
Don't press to comfort me
For the destruction of my people's daughter.
Urge not your mad holiday upon me! For a day of discomfiture and of breaking and of perplexity hath the Lord, Jehovah of hosts, in the valley of vision, a[315] breaking down of the wall and a crying to the mountain. These few words of prose, which follow the pathetic elegy, have a finer pathos still. The cumulative force of the successive clauses is very impressive: disappointment at the eleventh hour; the sense of a being trampled and overborne by sheer brute force; the counsels, courage, hope and faith of fifty years crushed to blank perplexity, and all this from Himself—the Lord, Jehovah of hosts—in the very valley of vision, the home of prophecy; as if He had meant of purpose to destroy these long confidences of the past on the floor where they had been wrestled for and asserted, and not by the force of the foe, but by the folly of His own people, to make them ashamed. The last clause crashes out the effect of it all; every spiritual rampart and refuge torn down, there is nothing left but an appeal to the hills to fall and cover us—a breaking down of the wall and a crying to the mountain.
Don't push your crazy holiday on me! For a day of confusion, breaking, and chaos has the Lord, Jehovah of hosts, in the valley of vision, a[315] breaking down of the wall and a crying to the mountain. These few lines that follow the sad poem carry an even deeper emotion. The weight of the successive phrases is really powerful: disappointment at the last moment; the feeling of being trampled and overwhelmed by sheer force; the advice, courage, hope, and faith built over fifty years crushed to total confusion, all of this coming from Him—the Lord, Jehovah of hosts—in the very valley of vision, the birthplace of prophecy; as if He deliberately aimed to destroy the long-held trust of the past right where they had fought for and established it, not by the enemy's strength, but by the foolishness of His own people, to make them feel ashamed. The final phrase emphasizes the overall impact; with every spiritual defense and refuge demolished, there’s nothing left but to plead with the mountains to fall and cover us—a breaking down of the wall and a crying to the mountain.
On the brink of the precipice, Isaiah draws back for a moment, to describe with some of his old fire the appearance of the besiegers (vv. 6-8a). And this suggests what kind of preparation Jerusalem had made for her foe—every kind, says Isaiah, but the supreme one. The arsenal, Solomon's forest-house, with its cedar pillars, had been looked to (ver. 8), the fortifications inspected and increased, and the suburban waters brought within them (vv. 9-11a). But ye looked not unto Him that had done this, who had brought this providence upon you; neither had ye respect unto Him that fashioned it long ago, whose own plan it had been. To your alliances and fortifications you fled in the hour of calamity, but not to Him in whose guidance the course of calamity lay. And therefore, when your engineering and diplomacy failed you, your religion vanished with[316] them. In that day did the Lord, Jehovah of hosts, call to weeping, and to mourning, and to baldness, and to girding with sackcloth; but, behold, joy and gladness, slaying oxen and killing sheep, eating flesh and drinking wine: Let us eat and drink, for to-morrow we shall die. It was the dropping of the mask. For half a century this people had worshipped God, but they had never trusted Him beyond the limits of their treaties and their bulwarks. And so when their allies were defeated, and their walls began to tremble, their religion, bound up with these things, collapsed also; they ceased even to be men, crying like beasts, Let us eat and drink, for to-morrow we die. For such a state of mind Isaiah will hold out no promise; it is the sin against the Holy Ghost, and for it there is no forgiveness. And Jehovah of hosts revealed Himself in mine ears. Surely this iniquity shall not be purged from you till ye die, saith the Lord, Jehovah of hosts.
On the edge of the cliff, Isaiah pauses for a moment to vividly describe the appearance of those attacking (vv. 6-8a). This highlights the kind of preparation Jerusalem had made for her enemy—everything, Isaiah says, except the most important one. They had relied on the arsenal, Solomon's forest-house with its cedar pillars (ver. 8), inspected and reinforced their walls, and redirected the suburban water supply inside (vv. 9-11a). But you did not look to Him who created this, who had brought this situation upon you; nor did you acknowledge Him who planned it long ago, whose design it truly was. In your time of trouble, you turned to your alliances and fortifications, but not to Him whose guidance determined your fate. And so, when your strategies and diplomacy failed, your faith disappeared with[316] them. In that day, the Lord, Jehovah of hosts, called for weeping, mourning, baldness, and wearing sackcloth; but instead, there was joy and gladness, slaughtering oxen and killing sheep, eating meat and drinking wine: Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die. It was the dropping of the façade. For fifty years, this people had worshipped God, but they had never truly trusted Him beyond their treaties and defenses. So when their allies were defeated, and their walls began to shake, their faith, tied to those things, crumbled as well; they lost their humanity, crying out like animals, Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die. For such a mindset, Isaiah offers no hope; it is the sin against the Holy Spirit, and there is no forgiveness for it. And Jehovah of hosts revealed Himself in my ears. Truly, this iniquity will not be removed from you until you die, says the Lord, Jehovah of hosts.
Back forty years the word had been, Go and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not. Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes, lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and turn again and be healed. What happened now was only what was foretold then: And if there be yet a tenth in it, it shall again be for consumption. That radical revision of judgement was now being literally fulfilled, when Isaiah, sure at last of his remnant within the walls of Jerusalem, was forced for their sin to condemn even them to death.
Back forty years ago, the message was, Go and tell this people, You hear, but don’t understand; you see, but don’t perceive. Make this people’s hearts dull, their ears heavy, and their eyes shut, so they can’t see with their eyes, hear with their ears, or understand with their hearts, and turn again to be healed. What’s happening now is just what was predicted back then: And if there is still a tenth left, it will again be consumed. That drastic change in judgment is now being literally fulfilled, as Isaiah, finally confident in his remnant within the walls of Jerusalem, has to condemn even them to death because of their sins.
Nevertheless, Isaiah had still respect to the ultimate survival of a remnant. How firmly he believed in it could not be more clearly illustrated than by the fact[317] that when he had so absolutely devoted his fellow-citizens to destruction he also took the most practical means for securing a better political future. If there is any reason, it can only be this, for putting the second section of chap. xxii., which advocates a change of ministry in the city (vv. 15-22), so close to the first, which sees ahead nothing but destruction for the State (vv. 1-14).
Nevertheless, Isaiah still believed in the ultimate survival of a remnant. His firm belief in this is illustrated by the fact[317] that while he had completely devoted his fellow citizens to destruction, he also took practical steps to secure a better political future. If there’s any reason for placing the second section of chapter xxii., which calls for a change in leadership in the city (vv. 15-22), so close to the first section, which foresees nothing but destruction for the State (vv. 1-14), it can only be this.
The mayor of the palace at this time was one Shebna, also called minister or deputy (lit. friend of the king). That his father is not named implies perhaps that Shebna was a foreigner; his own name betrays a Syrian origin; and he has been justly supposed to be the leader of the party then in power, whose policy was the Egyptian alliance, and whom in these latter years Isaiah had so frequently denounced as the root of Judah's bitterness. To this unfamilied intruder, who had sought to establish himself in Jerusalem, after the manner of those days, by hewing himself a great sepulchre, Isaiah brought sentence of violent banishment: Behold, Jehovah will be hurling, hurling thee away, thou big man, and crumpling, crumpling thee together. He will roll, roll thee on, thou rolling-stone, like a ball thrown out on broad level ground; there shall thou die, and there shall be the chariots of thy glory, thou shame of the house of thy lord. And I thrust thee from thy post, and from thy station do they pull thee down. This vagabond was not to die in his bed, nor to be gathered in his big tomb to the people on whom he had foisted himself. He should continue a rolling-stone. For him, like Cain, there was a land of Nod; and upon it he was to find a vagabond's death.
The mayor of the palace at this time was a man named Shebna, also referred to as minister or deputy (literally friend of the king). The fact that his father isn’t mentioned suggests that Shebna might have been a foreigner; his name indicates a Syrian background. He is generally believed to have led the party in power, which favored an alliance with Egypt, and whom Isaiah had often criticized in recent years as the source of Judah's troubles. To this nameless intruder, who had tried to establish himself in Jerusalem by carving out a grand tomb, Isaiah declared a sentence of harsh exile: Look, Jehovah will be hurling you away, you proud man, and crushing you together. He will roll you on, you rolling stone, like a ball thrown out onto flat ground; there you shall die, and there will be the chariots of your glory, you disgrace of your lord's house. I will remove you from your position, and from your rank they will pull you down. This wanderer would not die peacefully in his bed, nor would he be laid to rest in the grand tomb he had built for himself among the people he had imposed himself upon. He was destined to remain a rolling stone. For him, like Cain, there was a land of Nod; and there he was to meet a vagabond’s death.
To fill this upstart's place, Isaiah solemnly designated a man with a father: Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah. The[318] formulas he uses are perhaps the official ones customary upon induction to an office. But it may be also, that Isaiah has woven into these some expressions of even greater promise than usual. For this change of office-bearers was critical, and the overthrow of the "party of action" meant to Isaiah the beginning of the blessed future. And it shall come to pass that in that day I will call My servant Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah; and I will clothe him with thy robe, and with thy girdle will I strengthen him, and thine administration will I give into his hand, and he shall be for a father to the inhabitant of Jerusalem and to the house of Judah. And I will set the key of the house of David upon his shoulder; and he shall open, and none shut: and he shall shut, and none open. And I will hammer him in, a nail in a firm place, and he shall be for a throne of glory to his father's house. Thus to the last Isaiah will not allow Shebna to forget that he is without root among the people of God, that he has neither father nor family.
To take the place of this upstart, Isaiah seriously appointed a man with a father: Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah. The[318] phrases he uses are likely the standard ones used during an office induction. But it’s also possible that Isaiah has mixed in some expressions of even greater promise than usual. This change in leadership was crucial, and the fall of the "party of action" signified to Isaiah the start of a blessed future. And it shall come to pass that in that day I will call My servant Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah; and I will clothe him with thy robe, and with thy girdle will I strengthen him, and thine administration will I give into his hand, and he shall be for a father to the inhabitant of Jerusalem and to the house of Judah. And I will set the key of the house of David upon his shoulder; and he shall open, and none shut: and he shall shut, and none open. And I will hammer him in, a nail in a firm place, and he shall be for a throne of glory to his father's house. Thus, until the end, Isaiah will not let Shebna forget that he is without roots among the people of God, that he has neither father nor family.
But a family is a temptation, and the weight of it may drag even the man of the Lord's own hammering out of his place. This very year we find Eliakim in Shebna's post,[59] and Shebna reduced to be secretary; but Eliakim's family seem to have taken advantage of their relative's position, and either at the time he was designated, or more probably later, Isaiah wrote two sentences of warning upon the dangers of nepotism. Catching at the figure, with which his designation of Eliakim closed, that Eliakim would be a peg in a solid wall, a throne on which the glory of his father's house might settle, Isaiah reminds[319] the much-encumbered statesman that the firmest peg will give way if you hang too much on it, the strongest man be pulled down by his dependent and indolent family. They shall hang upon him all the weight of his father's house, the scions and the offspring (terms contrasted as degrees of worth), all the little vessels, from the vessels of cups to all the vessels of flagons. In that day, saith Jehovah of hosts, shall the peg that was knocked into a firm place give way, and it shall be knocked out and fall, and down shall be cut the burden that was upon it, for Jehovah hath spoken.
But a family can be a burden, and the pressure from it might even pull the person favored by the Lord out of his position. This year, we see Eliakim taking Shebna's role,[59] while Shebna has been demoted to secretary; however, it seems Eliakim's family has taken advantage of his new position. Whether it was at the time he was appointed or more likely afterward, Isaiah wrote a couple of warnings about the pitfalls of nepotism. Using the image of Eliakim being a peg in a solid wall, a base for his family's glory, Isaiah cautions[319] the overwhelmed politician that even the sturdiest peg can break if too much weight is hung on it, and the strongest man can be brought down by a lazy and dependent family. They shall hang upon him all the weight of his father's house, the descendants and the offspring (with the terms highlighting different levels of value), all the small items, from cups to all types of containers. On that day, declares the Lord of hosts, the peg that was fastened in a secure spot will give way, and it will be pulled out and fall, and the burden that was on it will be cut off, for the Lord has spoken.
So we have not one, but a couple of tragedies. Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah, follows Shebna, the son of Nobody. The fate of the overburdened nail is as grievous as that of the rolling stone. It is easy to pass this prophecy over as a trivial incident; but when we have carefully analysed each verse, restored to the words their exact shade of signification, and set them in their proper contrasts, we perceive the outlines of two social dramas, which it requires very little imagination to invest with engrossing moral interest.
So we have not just one, but a few tragedies. Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah, succeeds Shebna, the son of Nobody. The plight of the overburdened nail is just as serious as that of the rolling stone. It’s easy to dismiss this prophecy as a minor event, but once we analyze each verse, clarify the words to their true meanings, and place them in their correct contexts, we reveal the outlines of two social dramas that take very little imagination to be filled with captivating moral significance.
CHAPTER XX.
THE TURN OF THE TIDE: MORAL EFFECTS OF FORGIVENESS.
Isaiah xxii., contrasted with xxxiii. (701 B.C.).
Isaiah xxii., compared to xxxiii. (701 B.C.).
The collapse of Jewish faith and patriotism in the face of the enemy was complete. Final and absolute did Isaiah's sentence ring out: Surely this iniquity shall not be purged from you till ye die, saith Jehovah of hosts. So we learn from chap. xxii., written, as we conceive, in 701, when the Assyrian armies had at last invested Jerusalem. But in chap. xxxiii., which critics unite in placing a few months later in the same year, Isaiah's tone is entirely changed. He hurls the woe of the Lord upon the Assyrians; confidently announces their immediate destruction; turns, while the whole city's faith hangs upon him, in supplication to the Lord; and announces the stability of Jerusalem, her peace, her glory and the forgiveness of all her sins. It is this great moral difference between chaps. xxii. and xxxiii.—prophecies that must have been delivered within a few months of each other—which this chapter seeks to expound.
The collapse of Jewish faith and patriotism in the face of the enemy was complete. Isaiah's message rang out clearly: Surely this iniquity shall not be purged from you till ye die, saith Jehovah of hosts. We learn this from chapter 22, written, as we believe, in 701, when the Assyrian armies had finally surrounded Jerusalem. But in chapter 33, which critics agree was written a few months later that same year, Isaiah's tone shifts completely. He pronounces God's judgment on the Assyrians, confidently declares their imminent destruction, turns in prayer to the Lord while the entire city's faith rests on him, and proclaims the stability of Jerusalem, her peace, her glory, and the forgiveness of all her sins. This major moral difference between chapters 22 and 33—prophecies that must have been delivered within months of each other—is what this chapter aims to explain.
In spite of her collapse, as pictured in chap. xxii., Jerusalem was not taken. Her rulers fled; her people, as if death were certain, betook themselves to dissipation; and yet the city did not fall into the hands of the Assyrian. Sennacherib himself does not pretend to have taken[321] Jerusalem. He tells us how closely he invested Jerusalem, but he does not add that he took it, a silence which is the more significant that he records the capture of every other town which his armies attempted. He says that Hezekiah offered him tribute, and details the amount he received. He adds that the tribute was not paid at Jerusalem (as it would have been had Jerusalem been conquered), but that for "the payment of the tribute and the performance of homage" Hezekiah "despatched his envoy"[60] to him when he was at some distance from Jerusalem. All this agrees with the Bible narrative. In the book of Kings we are told how Hezekiah sent to the King of Assyria at Lachish, saying, I have offended; return from me; that which thou puttest upon me I will bear. And the King of Assyria appointed unto Hezekiah, King of Judah, three hundred talents of silver and thirty talents of gold. And Hezekiah gave him all the silver that was found in the house of Jehovah and in the treasures of the king's house. At the same time did Hezekiah cut off the gold from the doors of the temple of Jehovah, and from the pillars which Hezekiah, King of Judah, had overlaid, and gave it to the King of Assyria.[61] It was indeed a sore submission, when even the Temple of the Lord had to be stripped of its gold. But it purchased the relief of the city; and no price was too high to pay for that at such a moment as the present, when the populace was demoralised. We may even see Isaiah's[322] hand in the submission. The integrity of Jerusalem was the one fact on which the word of the Lord had been pledged, on which the promised remnant could be rallied. The Assyrian must not be able to say that he has made Zion's God like the gods of the heathen, and her people must see that even when they have given her up Jehovah can hold her for Himself, though in holding He tear and wound (xxxi. 4). The Temple is greater than the gold of the Temple; let even the latter be stripped off and sold to the heathen if it can purchase the integrity of the former. So Jerusalem remained inviolate; she was still the virgin, the daughter of Zion.
Despite her collapse, as shown in chap. xxii., Jerusalem was not captured. Her leaders fled; her people, thinking death was inevitable, turned to partying; yet the city did not fall into the hands of the Assyrians. Sennacherib himself does not claim to have taken Jerusalem. He explains how tightly he surrounded the city, but he doesn’t say he conquered it, which is notable since he records the capture of every other city his armies attacked. He mentions that Hezekiah offered him tribute and provides the amount he received. He adds that the tribute was not paid in Jerusalem (as it would have been if the city had been conquered), but rather that Hezekiah "sent his envoy" to him while he was a distance away from Jerusalem for “the payment of the tribute and the performance of homage.” All of this aligns with the biblical account. In the book of Kings, we learn how Hezekiah reached out to the King of Assyria at Lachish, saying, I have done wrong; leave me alone; I’ll bear what you put on me. And the King of Assyria demanded from Hezekiah, King of Judah, three hundred talents of silver and thirty talents of gold. Hezekiah gave him all the silver found in the house of Jehovah and in the treasures of the king’s palace. Hezekiah also stripped the gold from the doors of the temple of Jehovah and from the pillars he had overlaid, and gave it to the King of Assyria. It was indeed a heavy sacrifice when even the Temple of the Lord had to be stripped of its gold. But it bought relief for the city; and no price was too high to pay at such a time when the people were demoralized. We might even see Isaiah’s influence in this submission. The safety of Jerusalem was the one fact that the word of the Lord had been committed to, upon which the promised remnant could be gathered. The Assyrian must not be able to claim that he made Zion's God like the gods of the pagans, and her people needed to see that even when they had given her up, Jehovah could still protect her, even if it meant wounding her (xxxi. 4). The Temple is more important than the gold of the Temple; let even the gold be stripped and sold to the pagans if it can secure the safety of the Temple. Thus, Jerusalem remained untouched; she was still the virgin, the daughter of Zion.
And now upon the redeemed city Isaiah could proceed to rebuild the shattered faith and morals of her people. He could say to them, "Everything has turned out as, by the word of the Lord, I said it should. The Assyrian has come down; Egypt has failed you. Your politicians, with their scorn of religion and their confidence in their cleverness, have deserted you. I told you that your numberless sacrifices and pomp of unreal religion would avail you nothing in your day of disaster, and lo! when this came, your religion collapsed. Your abounding wickedness, I said, could only close in your ruin and desertion by God. But one promise I kept steadfast: that Jerusalem would not fall; and to your penitence, whenever it should be real, I assured forgiveness. Jerusalem stands to-day, according to my word; and I repeat my gospel. History has vindicated my word, but Come now, let us bring our reasoning to a close, saith the Lord; though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be white as snow: though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. I call upon you to build again on your redeemed city, and by the grace of this pardon, the fallen ruins of your life."
And now, in the restored city, Isaiah could work to rebuild the broken faith and morals of its people. He could say to them, "Everything has turned out just as I said it would, by the word of the Lord. The Assyrian threat has come down; Egypt has let you down. Your politicians, who scorn religion and trust only in their own cleverness, have abandoned you. I warned you that your countless sacrifices and showy religion would do you no good in your time of crisis, and look! When disaster hit, your faith fell apart. Your rampant wrongdoing, I said, could only lead to your ruin and abandonment by God. But one promise I kept firmly: that Jerusalem would not fall; and to your genuine repentance, I promised forgiveness. Jerusalem stands today, just as I said; and I repeat my message. History has confirmed my words, but Come now, let us reason together, says the Lord; though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow: though they are red like crimson, they shall be like wool. I urge you to rebuild in your restored city, and through the grace of this forgiveness, rise from the fallen ruins of your life."
[323]Some such sermon—if indeed not actually part of chap. i.—we must conceive Isaiah to have delivered to the people when Hezekiah had bought off Sennacherib, for we find the state of Jerusalem suddenly altered. Instead of the panic, which imagined the daily capture of the city, and rushed in hectic holiday to the housetops, crying, Let us eat and drink, for to-morrow we die, we see the citizens back upon the walls, trembling yet trusting. Instead of sweeping past Isaiah in their revelry and leaving him to feel that after forty years of travail he had lost all his influence with them, we see them gathering round about him as their single hope and confidence (xxxvii.). King and people look to Isaiah as their counsellor, and cannot answer the enemy without consulting him. What a change from the days of the Egyptian alliance, embassies sent off against his remonstrance, and intrigues developed without his knowledge; when Ahaz insulted him, and the drunken magnates mimicked him, and, in order to rouse an indolent people, he had to walk about the streets of Jerusalem for three years, stripped like a captive! Truly this was the day of Isaiah's triumph, when God by events vindicated his prophecy, and all the people acknowledged his leadership.
[323]We can imagine Isaiah giving a sermon—if it's not actually part of chap. i.—to the people after Hezekiah successfully negotiated with Sennacherib, because we see a sudden change in Jerusalem's situation. Instead of the panic that had people believing the city would be captured at any moment, who rushed to the rooftops shouting, Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die, we now see the citizens returning to the walls, fearful yet hopeful. Rather than ignoring Isaiah in their celebrations, leaving him feeling like he had lost all influence after forty years of struggle, we see them gathering around him as their sole source of hope and confidence (xxxvii.). The king and the people turn to Isaiah for advice and won't respond to the enemy without consulting him. What a shift from the days of relying on Egypt for help, when embassies were sent off despite his warnings, and plots were made without his knowledge; when Ahaz disrespected him, and the drunk nobles mocked him, making him walk around Jerusalem for three years like a prisoner just to awaken a lethargic populace! Truly, this was Isaiah's moment of triumph when God proved his prophecy through events, and everyone recognized his leadership.
It was the hour of the prophet's triumph, but the nation had as yet only trials before it. God has not done with nations or men when He has forgiven them. This people, whom of His grace, and in spite of themselves, God had saved from destruction, stood on the brink of another trial. God had given them a new lease of life, but it was immediately to pass through the furnace. They had bought off Sennacherib, but Sennacherib came back.
It was the time of the prophet's victory, but the nation still faced challenges ahead. God isn't finished with nations or people just because He has forgiven them. This group, whom God had saved from ruin out of His grace, despite their own flaws, was on the verge of another trial. God had given them a fresh start, but they were about to go through a tough time. They had managed to pay off Sennacherib, but he returned.
When Sennacherib got the tribute, he repented of[324] the treaty he had made with Hezekiah. He may have felt that it was a mistake to leave in his rear so powerful a fortress, while he had still to complete the overthrow of the Egyptians. So, in spite of the tribute, he sent a force back to Jerusalem to demand her surrender. We can imagine the moral effect upon King Hezekiah and his people. It was enough to sting the most demoralised into courage. Sennacherib had doubtless expected so pliant a king and so crushed a people to yield at once. But we may confidently picture the joy of Isaiah, as he felt the return of the Assyrians to be the very thing required to restore spirit to his demoralised countrymen. Here was a foe, whom they could face with a sense of justice, and not, as they had met him before, in carnal confidence and the pride of their own cleverness. Now was to be a war not, like former wars, undertaken merely for party glory, but with the purest feelings of patriotism and the firmest sanctions of religion, a campaign to be entered upon, not with Pharaoh's support and the strength of Egyptian chariots, but with God Himself as an ally—of which it could be said to Judah, Thy righteousness shall go before thee, and the glory of the Lord shall be thy rereward.
When Sennacherib received the tribute, he regretted the treaty he had made with Hezekiah. He might have thought it was a mistake to leave such a powerful fortress behind while he still needed to finish dealing with the Egyptians. So, despite receiving the tribute, he sent a force back to Jerusalem to demand its surrender. We can imagine the impact this had on King Hezekiah and his people. It was enough to inspire even the most defeated among them to find their courage. Sennacherib likely expected such a compliant king and such a crushed people to give in immediately. But we can confidently picture the joy of Isaiah as he realized that the Assyrians' return was exactly what his demoralized countrymen needed to regain their spirit. Here was an enemy they could confront with a strong sense of justice, rather than, as before, with overconfidence and arrogance. This time, the war would not be fought merely for factional glory but with true patriotism and solid moral conviction, a campaign to be waged not with Pharaoh's backing and the power of Egyptian chariots, but with God Himself as their ally—of which it could be said to Judah, Your righteousness shall go before you, and the glory of the Lord shall be your rear guard.
On what free, exultant wings the spirit of Isaiah must have risen to the sublime occasion! We know him as by nature an ardent patriot and passionate lover of his city, but through circumstance her pitiless critic and unsparing judge. In all the literature of patriotism there are no finer odes and orations than those which it owes to him; from no lips came stronger songs of war, and no heart rejoiced more in the valour that turns the battle from the gate. But till now Isaiah's patriotism had been chiefly a conscience[325] of his country's sins, his passionate love for Jerusalem repressed by as stern a loyalty to righteousness, and all his eloquence and courage spent in holding his people from war and persuading them to returning and rest. At last this conflict is at an end. The stubbornness of Judah, which has divided like some rock the current of her prophet's energies, and forced it back writhing and eddying upon itself, is removed. Isaiah's faith and his patriotism run free with the force of twin-tides in one channel, and we hear the fulness of their roar as they leap together upon the enemies of God and the fatherland. Woe to thee, thou spoiler, and thou wast not spoiled, thou treacherous dealer, and they did not deal treacherously with thee! Whenever thou ceasest to spoil, thou shall be spoiled; and whenever thou hast made an end to deal treacherously, they shall deal treacherously with thee. O Jehovah, be gracious unto us; for Thee have we waited: be Thou their arm every morning, our salvation also in the time of trouble. From the noise of a surging the peoples have fled; from the lifting up of Thyself the nations are scattered. And gathered is your spoil, the gathering of the caterpillar; like the leaping of locusts, they are leaping upon it. Exalted is Jehovah; yea, He dwelleth on high: He hath filled Zion with justice and righteousness. And there shall be stability of thy times, wealth of salvation, wisdom and knowledge; the fear of Jehovah, it shall be his treasure (xxxiii. 1-6).
On what free, exultant wings the spirit of Isaiah must have risen to the sublime occasion! We know him as naturally an ardent patriot and passionate lover of his city, but due to circumstance, he is her harsh critic and relentless judge. In all the literature of patriotism, there are no finer odes and speeches than those that he has given; no one else could express stronger war songs, and no heart celebrated more in the bravery that turns the battle away from the gates. But until now, Isaiah's patriotism had mostly been a conscience of his country's sins, his passionate love for Jerusalem suppressed by a strict loyalty to righteousness, and all his eloquence and courage used to keep his people from war and persuade them to returning and rest. Finally, this conflict is over. The stubbornness of Judah, which had divided like a rock the flow of her prophet's energies and forced them back, struggling and eddying upon themselves, is gone. Isaiah's faith and patriotism run free as if they are two strong tides in the same channel, and we hear their full roar as they rush together against the enemies of God and the homeland. Woe to you, you spoiler, and you weren’t spoiled, you treacherous dealer, and they did not deal treacherously with you! Whenever you stop spoiling, you will be spoiled; and whenever you cease to deal treacherously, they will deal treacherously with you. O Jehovah, be gracious to us; for we have waited for You: be their arm every morning, our salvation also in times of trouble. From the noise of a rushing wave, the peoples have fled; from your raising up, the nations are scattered. And your spoil is gathered, like that of the caterpillar; like the leaping of locusts, they leap upon it. Exalted is Jehovah; yes, He dwells on high: He has filled Zion with justice and righteousness. And there will be stability in your times, prosperity in salvation, wisdom and knowledge; the fear of Jehovah will be his treasure (xxxiii. 1-6).
Thus, then, do we propose to bridge the gulf which lies between chaps. i. and xxii. on the one hand and chap. xxxiii. on the other. If they are all to be dated from the year 701, some such bridge is necessary. And the one we have traced is both morally sufficient and in harmony with what we know to have been the course of events.
Thus, we aim to connect the gap between chapters 1 and 22 on one side and chapter 33 on the other. If all these chapters are set in the year 701, such a connection is needed. The path we've outlined is both morally adequate and aligns with what we understand about the sequence of events.
[326]What do we learn from it all? We learn a great deal upon that truth which chap. xxxiii. closes by announcing—the truth of Divine forgiveness.
[326]What do we take away from all this? We gain a lot from the truth that chapter xxxiii wraps up with—the truth of God's forgiveness.
The forgiveness of God is the foundation of every bridge from a hopeless past to a courageous present. That God can make the past be for guilt as though it had not been is always to Isaiah the assurance of the future. An old Greek miniature[62] represents him with Night behind him, veiled and sullen and holding a reversed torch. But before him stands Dawn and Innocence, a little child, with bright face and forward step and torch erect and burning. From above a hand pours light upon the face of the prophet, turned upwards. It is the message of a Divine pardon. Never did prophet more wearily feel the moral continuity of the generations, the lingering and ineradicable effects of crime. Only faith in a pardoning God could have enabled him, with such conviction of the inseparableness of yesterday and to-morrow, to make divorce between them, and turning his back on the past, as this miniature represents, hail the future as Immanuel, a child of infinite promise. From exposing and scourging the past, from proving it corrupt and pregnant with poison for all the future, Isaiah will turn on a single verse, and give us a future without war, sorrow or fraud. His pivot is ever the pardon of God. But nowhere is his faith in this so powerful, his turning upon it so swift, as at this period of Jerusalem's collapse, when, having sentenced the people to death for their iniquity—It was revealed in mine ears by Jehovah of hosts, Surely this iniquity shall not be purged from you till ye[327] die, saith the Lord, Jehovah of hosts (xxii. 14)—he swings round on his promise of a little before—Though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be white as snow—and to the people's penitence pronounces in the last verse of chap. xxxiii. a final absolution: The inhabitant shall not say, I am sick; the people that dwell therein are forgiven their iniquity. If chap. xxxiii. be, as many think, Isaiah's latest oracle, then we have the literal crown of all his prophesying in these two words: forgiven iniquity. It is as he put it early that same year: Come now and let us bring our reasoning to a close; though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow: though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. If man is to have a future, this must be the conclusion of all his past.
The forgiveness of God is the foundation of every bridge from a hopeless past to a brave present. The idea that God can erase our guilt from the past, making it feel as if it never happened, is always a source of hope for Isaiah about the future. An old Greek miniature[62] depicts him with Night behind him, dark and gloomy, holding a turned-off torch. But in front of him stands Dawn and Innocence, a little child, with a bright face, a confident step, and a lit torch. A hand from above shines light on the prophet's upward-facing face. It carries the message of divine forgiveness. No prophet has felt the heavy weight of the moral legacy of generations, the lasting effects of wrongdoing, more than he has. Only faith in a forgiving God could have allowed him, with such conviction about the connection between yesterday and tomorrow, to separate them and, by turning away from the past as this miniature shows, welcome the future as Immanuel, a child of endless promise. From exposing and condemning the past, from proving it corrupt and toxic for all that comes after, Isaiah will pivot on a single verse and offer us a future free from war, sorrow, or deceit. His focus remains steadfast on God’s forgiveness. But nowhere is his faith in this concept stronger, and his response quicker, than during this time of Jerusalem's downfall, when he has condemned the people to death for their sins—It was revealed in mine ears by Jehovah of hosts, Surely this iniquity shall not be purged from you till ye[327] die, saith the Lord, Jehovah of hosts (xxii. 14)—and he swiftly turns back to his earlier promise—Though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be white as snow—and announces in the last verse of chap. xxxiii a final forgiveness to the people's repentance: The inhabitant shall not say, I am sick; the people that dwell therein are forgiven their iniquity. If chap. xxxiii is, as many believe, Isaiah's final message, then we find the true essence of all his prophecies in these two words: forgiven iniquity. As he expressed earlier that same year: Come now and let us reason together; though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow: though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. If humanity is to have a future, this must be the conclusion of all its past.
But the absoluteness of God's pardon, making the past as though it had not been, is not the only lesson which the spiritual experience of Jerusalem in that awful year of 701 has for us. Isaiah's gospel of forgiveness is nothing less than this: that when God gives pardon He gives Himself. The name of the blessed future, which is entered through pardon—as in that miniature, a child—is Immanuel: God-with-us. And if it be correct that we owe the forty-sixth Psalm to these months when the Assyrian came back upon Jerusalem, then we see how the city, that had abandoned God, is yet able to sing when she is pardoned, God is our refuge and our strength, a very present help in the midst of troubles. And this gospel of forgiveness is not only Isaiah's. According to the whole Bible, there is but one thing which separates man from God—that is sin, and when sin is done away with, God cannot be kept from man. In giving pardon to man, God gives back to man Himself. How gloriously[328] evident this truth becomes in the New Testament! Christ, who is set before us as the Lamb of God, who beareth the sins of the world, is also Immanuel—God-with-us. The Sacrament, which most plainly seals to the believer the value of the One Sacrifice for sin, is the Sacrament in which the believer feeds upon Christ and appropriates Him. The sinner, who comes to Christ, not only receives pardon for Christ's sake, but receives Christ. Forgiveness means nothing less than this: that in giving pardon God gives Himself.
But the completeness of God's forgiveness, making the past seem as if it never happened, isn’t the only message from the spiritual experience of Jerusalem during that terrible year of 701. Isaiah's message of forgiveness is simply this: when God forgives, He gives Himself. The name of the blessed future that is reached through forgiveness—like in that picture, a child—is Immanuel: God-with-us. And if it's true that we owe the forty-sixth Psalm to those months when the Assyrian army returned to Jerusalem, then we see how the city, which had turned away from God, can still sing when it is forgiven, God is our refuge and our strength, a very present help in the midst of troubles. This message of forgiveness isn’t just Isaiah's. According to the entire Bible, there’s only one thing that separates man from God—that’s sin, and when sin is removed, God can’t be kept away from man. In forgiving man, God gives man back Himself. This truth becomes so clear in the New Testament! Christ, who is shown to us as the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world, is also Immanuel—God-with-us. The Sacrament, which most clearly demonstrates to the believer the importance of the One Sacrifice for sin, is the Sacrament in which the believer partakes of Christ and embraces Him. The sinner who comes to Christ not only receives forgiveness for Christ's sake but also receives Christ. Forgiveness means nothing less than this: that in giving pardon, God gives Himself.
But if forgiveness mean all this, then the objections frequently brought against a conveyance of it so unconditioned as that of Isaiah fall to the ground. Forgiveness of such a kind cannot be either unjust or demoralising. On the contrary, we see Jerusalem permoralised by it. At first, it is true, the sense of weakness and fear abounds, as we learn from the narrative in chaps. xxxvi. and xxxvii. But where there was vanity, recklessness and despair, giving way to dissipation, there is now humility, discipline and a leaning upon God, that are led up to confidence and exultation. Jerusalem's experience is just another proof that any moral results are possible to so great a process as the return of God to the soul. Awful is the responsibility of them who receive such a Gift and such a Guest; but the sense of that awfulness is the atmosphere, in which obedience and holiness and the courage that is born of both love best to grow. One can understand men scoffing at messages of pardon so unconditioned as Isaiah's, who think they "mean no more than a clean slate." Taken in this sense, the gospel of forgiveness must prove a savour of death unto death. But just as Jerusalem interpreted the message of her pardon to mean that [329]God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved, and straightway obedience was in all her hearts, and courage upon all her walls, so neither to us can be futile the New Testament form of the same gospel, which makes our pardoned soul the friend of God, accepted in the Beloved, and our body His holy temple.
But if forgiveness means all this, then the objections often raised against such unconditional forgiveness as that of Isaiah fall flat. This kind of forgiveness can't be either unjust or demoralizing. On the contrary, we see Jerusalem uplifted by it. At first, it's true that there’s a strong sense of weakness and fear, as shown in the narratives in chapters 36 and 37. But where there was once vanity, recklessness, and despair leading to excess, there is now humility, discipline, and reliance on God, which develops into confidence and joy. Jerusalem's experience is just another indication that any moral outcomes are possible through such a significant process as God reconnecting with the soul. The responsibility of those who receive such a Gift and such a Guest is immense; however, the awareness of that weightiness creates the environment where obedience, holiness, and the bravery that stems from both love can thrive best. It's understandable that people might mock messages of unconditional pardon like Isaiah's, thinking they "just mean a clean slate." Viewed that way, the gospel of forgiveness can feel like a fragrance of death leading to death. But just as Jerusalem understood her message of pardon to mean that [329]God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved, resulting in obedience filling all her hearts and courage on all her walls, the New Testament's version of the same gospel cannot be meaningless to us either. It shows that our pardoned soul is a friend of God, accepted in the Beloved, and our body is His holy temple.
Upon one other point connected with the forgiveness of sins we get instruction from the experience of Jerusalem. A man has difficulty in squaring his sense of forgiveness with the return on the back of it of his old temptations and trials, with the hostility of fortune and with the inexorableness of nature. Grace has spoken to his heart, but Providence bears more hard upon him than ever. Pardon does not change the outside of life; it does not immediately modify the movements of history, or suspend the laws of nature. Although God has forgiven Jerusalem, Assyria comes back to besiege her. Although the penitent be truly reconciled to God, the constitutional results of his fall remain: the frequency of temptation, the power of habit, the bias and facility downwards, the physical and social consequences. Pardon changes none of these things. It does not keep off the Assyrians.
On another point related to forgiveness of sins, we can learn from the experience of Jerusalem. A person struggles to reconcile their sense of forgiveness with the return of old temptations and trials, the challenges of life, and the unforgiving nature of the world. Grace has touched their heart, but Providence weighs even more heavily on them than before. Forgiveness doesn’t change external circumstances; it doesn’t immediately alter the course of history or suspend the laws of nature. Even though God has forgiven Jerusalem, Assyria still comes back to lay siege to her. Likewise, even if a penitent person is truly reconciled with God, the lasting effects of their past mistakes remain: the constant temptations, the strength of habit, the tendency to fall back, and the physical and social consequences. Forgiveness doesn’t change any of these things. It doesn’t stop the Assyrians.
But if pardon means the return of God to the soul, then in this we have the secret of the return of the foe. Men could not try nor develop a sense of the former except by their experience of the latter. We have seen why Isaiah must have welcomed the perfidious reappearance of the Assyrians after he had helped to buy them off. Nothing could better test the sincerity of Jerusalem's repentance, or rally her dissipated forces. Had the Assyrians not returned, the Jews would have had no experimental proof of God's restored presence, and the great miracle would never[330] have happened that rang through human history for evermore—a trumpet-call to faith in the God of Israel. And so still the Lord scourgeth every son whom He receiveth, because He would put our penitence to the test; because He would discipline our disorganised affections, and give conscience and will a chance of wiping out defeat by victory; because He would baptize us with the most powerful baptism possible—the sense of being trusted once more to face the enemy upon the fields of our disgrace.
But if forgiveness means the return of God to the soul, then we have the key to the return of the enemy. People couldn’t understand or develop a sense of the former without experiencing the latter. We see why Isaiah must have welcomed the deceitful reappearance of the Assyrians after he had helped to pay them off. Nothing could better test the sincerity of Jerusalem's repentance or rally her scattered forces. If the Assyrians hadn’t come back, the Jews wouldn’t have had any real proof of God’s restored presence, and the great miracle that echoed through human history forever—a call to faith in the God of Israel—would never have happened. And so still the Lord scourges every son whom He receives, because He wants to test our repentance; because He wants to discipline our disorganized feelings, giving our conscience and will a chance to redeem defeat with victory; because He wants to immerse us in the most powerful baptism possible—the sense of being trusted once more to face the enemy on the fields of our shame.
That is why the Assyrians came back to Jerusalem, and that is why temptations and penalties still pursue the penitent and forgiven.
That’s why the Assyrians returned to Jerusalem, and that’s why temptations and punishments still follow the repentant and forgiven.
CHAPTER XXI.
OUR GOD A CONSUMING FIRE.
Isaiah xxxiii. (701 B.C.).
Isaiah 33 (701 B.C.).
We have seen how the sense of forgiveness and the exultant confidence, which fill chap. xxxiii., were brought about within a few months after the sentence of death, that cast so deep a gloom on chap. xxii. We have expounded some of the contents of chap. xxxiii., but have not exhausted the chapter; and in particular we have not touched one of Isaiah's principles, which there finds perhaps its finest expression: the consuming righteousness of God.
We have seen how the feeling of forgiveness and the overwhelming confidence, which fill chap. xxxiii., came about within a few months after the death sentence, which cast such a deep gloom on chap. xxii. We’ve discussed some of the contents of chap. xxxiii., but we haven’t covered everything in the chapter; in particular, we haven’t addressed one of Isaiah's principles, which perhaps finds its best expression there: the powerful righteousness of God.
There is no doubt that chap. xxxiii. refers to the sudden disappearance of the Assyrian from the walls of Jerusalem. It was written, part perhaps on the eve of that deliverance, part immediately after morning broke upon the vanished host. Before those verses which picture the disappearance of the investing army, we ought in strict chronological order to take the narrative in chaps. xxxvi. and xxxvii.—the return of the besiegers, the insolence of the Rabshakeh, the prostration of Hezekiah, Isaiah's solitary faith, and the sudden disappearance of the Assyrian. It will be more convenient, however, since we have already entered chap. xxxiii., to finish it, and then to take the narrative of the events which led up to it.
There’s no doubt that chapter 33 refers to the sudden disappearance of the Assyrian army from the walls of Jerusalem. It was written, at least in part, right before that deliverance, and partly right after morning broke over the vanished army. Before those verses that describe the disappearing army, we should in strict chronological order look at the narrative in chapters 36 and 37—the return of the besiegers, the arrogance of the Rabshakeh, Hezekiah's despair, Isaiah's unwavering faith, and the sudden disappearance of the Assyrian. However, it will be easier to complete chapter 33 first since we've already started it, and then we can look at the events that led up to it.
[332]The opening verses of chap. xxxiii. fit the very moment of the crisis, as if Isaiah had flung them across the walls in the teeth of the Rabshakeh and the second embassy from Sennacherib, who had returned to demand the surrender of the city in spite of Hezekiah's tribute for her integrity: Woe to thee, thou spoiler, and thou wast not spoiled, thou treacherous dealer, and they did not deal treacherously with thee! When thou ceasest to spoil, thou shalt be spoiled; and when thou makest an end to deal treacherously, they shall deal treacherously with thee. Then follows the prayer, as already quoted, and the confidence in the security of Jerusalem (ver. 2). A new paragraph (vv. 7-12) describes Rabshakeh and his company demanding the surrender of the city; the disappointment of the ambassadors who had been sent to treat with Sennacherib (ver. 7); the perfidy of the great king, who had broken the covenant they had made with him and swept his armies back upon Judah (ver. 8); the disheartening of the land under this new shock (ver. 9); and the resolution of the Lord now to rise and scatter the invaders: Now will I arise, saith Jehovah; now will I lift up Myself; now will I be exalted. Ye shall conceive chaff; ye shall bring forth stubble; your breath is a fire, that shall devour you. And the peoples shall be as the burnings of lime, as thorns cut down that are burned in the fire (vv. 10-12).
[332]The opening verses of chapter 33 capture the crisis perfectly, as if Isaiah had thrown them against the walls right in front of Rabshakeh and the second delegation from Sennacherib, who had come back to demand the city's surrender despite Hezekiah's tribute for its loyalty: Woe to you, you plunderer, who hasn’t been plundered, you treacherous dealer, who hasn’t been dealt with treacherously! When you stop plundering, you will be plundered; when you finish your treachery, they will betray you. Then follows the prayer, as already mentioned, and the certainty in Jerusalem's security (verse 2). A new section (verses 7-12) describes Rabshakeh and his group demanding the city's surrender; the disappointment of the ambassadors sent to negotiate with Sennacherib (verse 7); the betrayal by the great king, who broke the covenant they had made and unleashed his armies on Judah (verse 8); the discouragement of the land from this new blow (verse 9); and the Lord’s decision to rise up and scatter the invaders: Now I will rise up, says the Lord; now I will lift Myself up; now I will be exalted. You will produce chaff; you will bear stubble; your breath is a fire that will consume you. And the people will be like lime fires, like thorns cut down and burned in the fire. (verses 10-12).
After an application of this same fire of God's righteousness to the sinners within Jerusalem, to which we shall presently return, the rest of the chapter pictures the stunned populace awaking to the fact that they are free. Is the Assyrian really gone, or do the Jews dream as they crowd the walls, and see no trace of him? Have they all vanished—the Rabshakeh, [333]by the conduit of the upper pool, with his loud voice and insults; the scribes to whom they handed the tribute, and who prolonged the agony by counting it under their eyes; the scouts and engineers insolently walking about Zion and mapping out her walls for the assault; the close investment of barbarian hordes, with their awesome speech and uncouth looks! Where is he that counted? where is he that weighed the tribute? where is he that counted the towers? Thou shall not see the fierce people, a people of a deep speech that thou canst not perceive, of a strange tongue that thou canst not understand. They have vanished. Hezekiah may lift his head again. O people—sore at heart to see thy king in sackcloth and ashes[63] as the enemy devoured province after province of thy land and cooped thee up within the narrow walls, thou scarcely didst dare to peep across—take courage, the terror is gone! A king in his beauty thine eyes shall see; they shall behold the land spreading very far forth (ver. 17). We had thought to die in the restlessness and horror of war, never again to know what stable life and regular worship were, our Temple services interrupted, our home a battlefield. But look upon Zion; behold again she is the city of our solemn diets; thine eyes shall see Jerusalem a quiet habitation, a tent that shall not be removed, the stakes whereof shall never be plucked up, neither shall the cords thereof be broken. But there Jehovah, whom we have known only for affliction, shall be in majesty for us. Other peoples have their natural defences, Assyria and Egypt their Euphrates and Nile; but God Himself shall be for us a place of rivers, streams, broad on both hands, on which never a galley shall go, nor gallant ship[334] shall pass upon it. Without sign of battle, God shall be our refuge and our strength. It was that marvellous deliverance of Jerusalem by the hand of God, with no effort of human war, which caused Isaiah to invest with such majesty the meagre rock, its squalid surroundings and paltry defences. The insignificant and waterless city was glorious to the prophet because God was in her. One of the richest imaginations which patriot ever poured upon his fatherland was inspired by the simplest faith saint ever breathed. Isaiah strikes again the old keynote (chap. viii.) about the waterlessness of Jerusalem. We have to keep in mind the Jews' complaints of this, in order to understand what the forty-sixth Psalm means when it says, There is a river the streams whereof make glad the city of our God, the holy place of the tabernacles of the Most High—or what Isaiah means when he says, Glorious shall Jehovah be unto us, a place of broad rivers and streams. Yea, he adds, Jehovah is everything to us: Jehovah is our Judge; Jehovah is our Lawgiver; Jehovah is our King: He will save us.
After experiencing the same purifying fire of God's righteousness among the sinners in Jerusalem, which we will discuss shortly, the rest of the chapter describes the shocked people realizing they are free. Is the Assyrian really gone, or are the Jews just imagining it as they gather on the walls and see no sign of him? Have they all disappeared—the Rabshakeh, [333]by the conduit of the upper pool, with his loud voice and insults; the scribes who handled the tribute, extending the pain by counting it in front of them; the scouts and engineers arrogantly roaming Zion and planning their attack; the constant blockade of barbarian hordes, with their terrifying language and strange appearance! Where is the one who counted? Where is the one who weighed the tribute? Where is the one who counted the towers? You shall not see the fierce people, a people with a language so deep you cannot understand, with a strange tongue you cannot grasp. They have disappeared. Hezekiah can lift his head again. O people—heartbroken to see your king in sackcloth and ashes[63] as the enemy consumed province after province of your land and confined you within narrow walls, you scarcely dared to look beyond—take courage, the fear is gone! You shall behold your king in his glory; your eyes shall see the land spreading wide (ver. 17). We thought we would die in the chaos and horror of war, never to experience a stable life or regular worship again, our Temple services interrupted, our home a battlefield. But look upon Zion; see again she is the city of our holy gatherings; your eyes will see Jerusalem as a peaceful dwelling, a tent that will not be moved, whose stakes will never be pulled up, and whose cords will never be broken. But there, Jehovah, whom we have known only in our suffering, shall be in majesty for us. Other nations have their natural defenses, Assyria and Egypt their Euphrates and Nile; but God Himself will be for us a place of rivers, streams, broad on both sides, where no galleys or splendid ships[334] will pass over. Without the need for battle, God will be our refuge and strength. It was that miraculous deliverance of Jerusalem by the hand of God, without any effort of human warfare, that led Isaiah to describe the humble rock, its shabby surroundings and meager defenses, with such grandeur. The small, waterless city was glorious to the prophet because God was in her. One of the richest visions a patriot ever shared about his homeland was inspired by the most basic faith a saint ever expressed. Isaiah returns to the original theme (chap. viii.) about the lack of water in Jerusalem. We need to remember the Jews' complaints about this to understand what the forty-sixth Psalm means when it says, There is a river whose streams make glad the city of our God, the holy place where the Most High dwells—or what Isaiah means when he says, Glorious will Jehovah be for us, a place of broad rivers and streams. Indeed, he adds, Jehovah is everything to us: Jehovah is our Judge; Jehovah is our Lawgiver; Jehovah is our King: He will save us.
Such were the feelings aroused in Jerusalem by the sudden relief of the city. Some of the verses, which we have scarcely touched, we will now consider more fully as the expression of a doctrine which runs throughout Isaiah, and indeed is one of his two or three fundamental truths—that the righteousness of God is an all-pervading atmosphere, an atmosphere that wears and burns.
Such were the feelings stirred in Jerusalem by the sudden relief of the city. Some of the verses we have barely touched on will now be considered in more detail as they express a doctrine that runs throughout Isaiah, and is indeed one of his two or three fundamental truths—that the righteousness of God is an all-encompassing presence, a presence that both wears and burns.
For forty years the prophet had been preaching to the Jews his gospel, God-with-us; but they never awakened to the reality of the Divine presence till they saw it in the dispersion of the Assyrian army. Then[335] God became real to them (ver. 14). The justice of God, preached so long by Isaiah, had always seemed something abstract. Now they saw how concrete it was. It was not only a doctrine: it was a fact. It was a fact that was a fire. Isaiah had often called it a fire; they thought this was rhetoric. But now they saw the actual burning—the peoples as the burning of lime, as thorns cut down that are burned in the fire. And when they felt the fire so near, each sinner of them awoke to the fact that he had something burnable in himself, something which could as little stand the fire as the Assyrians could. There was no difference in this fire outside and inside the walls. What it burned there it would burn here. Nay, was not Jerusalem the dwelling-place of God, and Ariel the very hearth and furnace of the fire which they saw consume the Assyrians? Who, they cried in their terror—Who among us shall dwell with the devouring fire? Who among us shall dwell with everlasting burnings?
For forty years, the prophet had been preaching to the Jews his message, God-with-us; but they never realized the reality of God's presence until they witnessed the destruction caused by the Assyrian army. Then[335] God became real to them (ver. 14). The justice of God, which Isaiah had preached for so long, had always seemed abstract. Now they understood how concrete it was. It wasn’t just a doctrine; it was a reality. It was a reality that felt like fire. Isaiah had often referred to it as a fire; they thought he was being poetic. But now they experienced the actual burning—the people like the burning of lime, like thorns cut down and burned in the fire. And when they felt the fire so close, every sinner among them realized that they had something in themselves that could be consumed, something that couldn’t withstand the fire just as the Assyrians couldn’t. There was no difference between the fire outside and the fire inside the walls. What it burned there, it would burn here too. Besides, wasn’t Jerusalem the dwelling place of God, and Ariel the very hearth and furnace of the fire that they saw consume the Assyrians? Who, they cried in terror—Who among us shall dwell with the devouring fire? Who among us shall dwell with everlasting burnings?
We are familiar with Isaiah's fundamental God-with-us, and how it was spoken not for mercy only, but for judgement (chap. viii.). If God-with-us meant love with us, salvation with us, it meant also holiness with us, judgement with us, the jealousy of God breathing upon what is impure, false and proud. Isaiah felt this so hotly, that his sense of it has broken out into some of the fieriest words in all prophecy. In his younger days he told the citizens not to provoke the eyes of God's glory, as if Heaven had fastened on their life two gleaming orbs, not only to pierce them with its vision, but to consume them with its wrath. Again, in the lowering cloud of calamity he had seen lips of indignation, a tongue as a devouring fire, and in the overflowing stream which finally issued from it the hot[336] breath of the Almighty. These are unforgettable descriptions of the ceaseless activity of Divine righteousness in the life of man. They set our imaginations on fire with the prophet's burning belief in this. But they are excelled by another, more frequently used by Isaiah, wherein he likens the holiness of God to an universal and constant fire. To Isaiah life was so penetrated by the active justice of God, that he described it as bathed in fire, as blown through with fire. Righteousness was no mere doctrine to this prophet: it was the most real thing in history; it was the presence which pervaded and explained all phenomena. We shall understand the difference between Isaiah and his people if we have ever for our eyes' sake looked at a great conflagration through a coloured glass which allowed us to see the solid materials—stone, wood and iron—but prevented us from perceiving the flames and shimmering heat. To look thus is to see pillars, lintels and cross-beams twist and fall, crumble and fade; but how inexplicable the process seems! Take away the glass, and everything is clear. The fiery element is filling all the interstices, that were blank to us before, and beating upon the solid material. The heat becomes visible, shimmering even where there is no flame. Just so had it been with the sinners in Judah these forty years. Their society and politics, individual fortunes and careers, personal and national habits—the home, the Church, the State—common outlines and shapes of life—were patent to every eye, but no man could explain the constant decay and diminution, because all were looking at life through a glass darkly. Isaiah alone faced life with open vision, which filled up for him the interstices of experience and gave terrible explanation to fate. It was a vision that nearly scorched the eyes out of[337] him. Life as he saw it was steeped in flame—the glowing righteousness of God. Jerusalem was full of the spirit of justice, the spirit of burning. The light of Israel is for a fire, and his Holy One for a flame. The Assyrian empire, that vast erection which the strong hands of kings had reared, was simply their pyre, made ready for the burning. For a Topheth is prepared of old; yea, for the king it is made ready; He hath made it deep and large; the pile thereof is fire and much wood; the breath of Jehovah, like a stream of brimstone, doth kindle it.[64] So Isaiah saw life, and flashed it on his countrymen. At last the glass fell from their eyes also, and they cried aloud, Who among us shall dwell with the devouring fire? Who among us shall dwell with everlasting burnings? Isaiah replied that there is one thing which can survive the universal flame, and that is character: He that walketh righteously and speaketh uprightly; he that despiseth the gain of fraud, that shaketh his hands from the holding of bribes, that stoppeth his ears from the hearing of blood, and shutteth his eyes from looking on evil, he shall dwell on high: his place of defence shall be the munitions of rocks: his bread shall be given him: his water shall be sure.
We know about Isaiah's core idea of God being with us, and how it wasn't just about mercy, but also about judgment (chap. viii.). If God with us meant love with us, and salvation with us, it also meant holiness with us, judgment with us, and God's jealousy directed at what is impure, false, and arrogant. Isaiah felt this intensely, leading him to express some of the most passionate words in all prophecy. In his younger years, he warned the people not to provoke the eyes of God's glory, as if Heaven had fixed its gaze on their lives with two piercing orbs that could not only see them but also unleash divine wrath upon them. Again, amidst the looming disaster, he imagined lips of indignation, a tongue like a consuming fire, and in the overflowing torrent that came from it, the intense breath of the Almighty. These powerful images capture the relentless nature of Divine righteousness in human life. They ignite our imaginations, reflecting the prophet's fervent belief. Yet, there’s one description, used frequently by Isaiah, where he compares God's holiness to a universal, constant fire. For Isaiah, life was so infused with God’s active justice that he described it as being drenched in fire, constantly moved by it. Righteousness wasn’t just a theory to him; it was the most genuine reality in history—the presence that infused and clarified all experiences. We can grasp the difference between Isaiah and his people if we've ever looked at a massive fire through tinted glass that lets us see the solid materials—stone, wood, and iron—but keeps us from recognizing the flames and shimmering heat. Looking this way, we see pillars, lintels, and beams twist and fall, crumble and disappear; yet the process remains a mystery! Remove the glass, and everything becomes clear. The fiery element fills all the gaps that were previously blank, attacking the solid materials. The heat reveals itself, shimmering even without flames. Just like that, it had been for the sinners in Judah over the past forty years. Their society and politics, individual fortunes and aspirations, personal and national habits—the home, the Church, the State—the general shapes of life were visible to everyone, but no one could explain the constant decline, because they were all seeing life through a darkened lens. Isaiah alone faced reality with open eyes that filled in the gaps of experience and provided a harsh understanding of their fate. It was a vision that nearly scorched his eyes out. Life, as he perceived it, was drenched in flames—the blazing righteousness of God. Jerusalem was full of the spirit of justice, the spirit of burning. The light of Israel is for a fire, and his Holy One for a flame. The Assyrian empire, that grand structure built by powerful kings, was merely their pyre, ready for burning. For a Topheth is prepared of old; yea, for the king it is made ready; He hath made it deep and large; the pile thereof is fire and much wood; the breath of Jehovah, like a stream of brimstone, doth kindle it.[64] So Isaiah perceived life and reflected it back to his fellow countrymen. Eventually, the glass fell from their eyes too, and they cried out, Who among us shall dwell with the devouring fire? Who among us shall dwell with everlasting burnings? Isaiah responded that one thing can endure the universal flame, and that is character: He that walks righteously and speaks uprightly; he that despises dishonest gain, that shakes hands free of bribes, that stops ears from hearing bloodshed, and shuts eyes from looking at evil, he shall dwell on high: his place of defense shall be the strongholds of rock: his bread shall be supplied: his water shall be certain.
Isaiah's Vision of Fire suggests two thoughts to us.
Isaiah's Vision of Fire gives us two ideas to consider.
1. Have we done well to confine our horror of the consuming fires of righteousness to the next life? If we would but use the eyes which Scripture lends us, the rifts of prophetic vision and awakened conscience by which the fogs of this world and of our own hearts are rent, we should see fires as fierce, a consumption as pitiless, about us here as ever the conscience of a startled[338] sinner fearfully looked for across the grave. Nay, have not the fires, with which the darkness of eternity has been made lurid, themselves been kindled at the burnings of this life? Is it not because men have felt how hot this world was being made for sin that they have had a certain fearful expectation of judgement and the fierceness of fire? We shudder at the horrible pictures of hell which some older theologians and poets have painted for us; but it was not morbid fancy, nor the barbarism of their age nor their own heart's cruelty that inspired these men. It was their hot honour for the Divine holiness; it was their experience of how pitiless to sin Providence is already in this life; it was their own scorched senses and affections—brands, as many honest men among them felt themselves, plucked from the burning. Our God is a consuming fire—here as well as yonder. Hell has borrowed her glare from the imagination of men aflame with the real fieriness of life, and may be—more truly than of old—pictured as the dead and hollow cinder left by those fires, of which, as every true man's conscience is aware, this life is full. It was not hell that created conscience; it was conscience that created hell, and conscience was fired by the vision which fired Isaiah—of all life aglow with the righteousness of God—God with us, as He was with Jerusalem, a spirit of burning and a spirit of justice. This is the pantheism of conscience, and it stands to reason. God is the one power of life. What can exist beside Him except what is like Him? Nothing—sooner or later nothing but what is like Him. The will that is as His will, the heart that is pure, the character that is transparent—only these dwell with the everlasting fire, and burning with God, as the bush which Moses saw, are nevertheless not consumed. Let us lay it to heart—Isaiah has[339] nothing to tell us about hell-fire, but a great deal about the pitiless justice of God in this life.
1. Have we really done well by limiting our fear of the consuming fires of righteousness to the afterlife? If we used the insight that Scripture gives us, the glimpses of prophetic vision and awakened conscience that cut through the fog of this world and our own hearts, we would see fires as intense and a destruction as merciless around us today as a startled sinner anxiously anticipates across the grave. In fact, haven’t the fires that make the darkness of eternity so vivid been ignited by the struggles of this life? Isn't it true that people have sensed how intensified this world has become due to sin, leading them to feel a certain fearful expectation of judgement and the fierceness of fire? We cringe at the terrifying images of hell portrayed by some earlier theologians and poets; but it wasn’t twisted imagination, nor the brutality of their time, nor their own heart's cruelty that inspired these individuals. It was their fervent respect for the Divine holiness; it was their realization of how relentlessly Providence deals with sin in this life; it was their own scorched feelings and emotions—brands, as many honest people among them felt, snatched from the flames. Our God is a consuming fire—here as well as beyond. Hell has taken its intensity from the thoughts of people aflame with the true fervor of life and may be—more accurately than before—depicted as the lifeless and empty ash left by those fires, which every true man's conscience recognizes as abundant in this life. It was not hell that created conscience; it was conscience that created hell, and conscience was ignited by the same vision that inspired Isaiah—of all life burning with the righteousness of God—God with us, just as He was with Jerusalem, a spirit of burning and a spirit of justice. This reflects the deep connection between God and conscience, and it makes sense. God is the sole source of life. What can exist alongside Him except what resembles Him? Nothing—eventually nothing but what is like Him. Only the will aligned with His will, the pure heart, and the transparent character dwell with the everlasting fire, and, burning with God, like the bush Moses saw, they are nevertheless not consumed. Let's remember—Isaiah has[339] nothing to say about hellfire, but a lot about the relentless justice of God in this life.
2. The second thought suggested by Isaiah's Vision of Life is a comparison of it with the theory of life which is fashionable to-day. Isaiah's figure for life was a burning. Ours is a battle, and at first sight ours looks the truer. Seen through a formula which has become everywhere fashionable, life is a fierce and fascinating warfare. Civilised thought, when asked to describe any form of life or to account for a death or survival, most monotonously replies, "The struggle for existence." The sociologist has borrowed the phrase from the biologist, and it is on everybody's lips to describe their idea of human life. It is uttered by the historian when he would explain the disappearance of this national type, the prevalence of that one. The economist traces depression and failures, the fatal fevers of speculation, the cruelties and bad humours of commercial life, to the same source. A merchant with profits lessening and failure before him relieves his despair and apologizes to his pride with the words, "It is all due to competition." Even character and the spiritual graces are sometimes set down as results of the same material process. Some have sought to deduce from it all intelligence, others more audaciously all ethics; and it is certain that in the silence of men's hearts after a moral defeat there is no excuse more frequently offered to conscience by will than that the battle was too hot.
2. The second idea from Isaiah's Vision of Life is to compare it with today’s belief about life. Isaiah depicted life as a burning fire. Ours is seen as a battle, and at first glance, it appears more accurate. Through a concept that has become widely accepted, life is viewed as a fierce and captivating struggle. When civilized thinkers are asked to describe any form of life or to explain a death or survival, they monotonously respond, "The struggle for existence." Sociologists borrowed this phrase from biologists, and it’s on everyone’s lips when they talk about human life. Historians use it to explain why one national type disappears while another thrives. Economists trace downturns and failures, along with the damaging effects of speculation and the harsh realities of commercial life, back to the same idea. A merchant facing dwindling profits and looming failure often expresses his despair and excuses himself by saying, "It’s all due to competition." Even character and spiritual virtues are sometimes attributed to this same material process. Some have attempted to derive intelligence from it, while others more boldly link it to all ethics; and it’s clear that in the quiet moments after a moral defeat, the most common excuse offered to one's conscience is that the struggle was just too intense.
But fascinating as life is when seen through this formula, does not the formula act on our vision precisely as the glass we supposed, which when we look through it on a conflagration shows us the solid matter and the changes through which this passes, but hides from us the real agent? One need not[340] deny the reality of the struggle for existence, or that its results are enormous. We struggle with each other, and affect each other for good and for evil, sometimes past all calculation. But we do not fight in a vacuum. Let Isaiah's vision be the complement of our own feeling. We fight in an atmosphere that affects every one of us far more powerfully than the opposing wits or wills of our fellow-men. Around us and through us, within and without as we fight, is the all-pervading righteousness of God; and it is far oftener the effects of this which we see in the falls and the changes of life than the effects of our struggle with each other, enormous though these may be. On this point there is an exact parallel between our days and the days of Isaiah. Then the politicians of Judah, looking through their darkened glass at life, said, Life is simply a war in which the strongest prevail, a game which the most cunning win. So they made fast their alliances, and were ready to meet the Assyrian, or they fled in panic before him, according as Egypt or he seemed the stronger. Isaiah saw that with Assyrian and Jew another Power was present—the real reason of every change in politics, collapse or crash in either of the empires—the active righteousness of God. Assyrian and Jew had not only to contend with each other. They were at strife with Him. We now see plainly that Isaiah was right. Far more operative than the intrigues of politicians or the pride of Assyria, because it used these simply as its mines and its fuel, was the law of righteousness, the spiritual force which is as impalpable as the atmosphere, yet strong to burn and try as a furnace seven times heated. And Isaiah is equally right for to-day. As we look at life through our fashionable formula it does seem a mass of struggle, in which we catch[341] only now and then a glimpse of the decisions of righteousness, but the prevailing lawlessness of which we do not hesitate to make the reason of all that happens, and in particular the excuse of our own defeats. We are wrong. Righteousness is not an occasional spark; righteousness is the atmosphere. Though our dull eyes see it only now and then strike into flame in the battle of life, and take for granted that it is but the flash of meeting wits or of steel on steel, God's justice is everywhere, pervasive and pitiless, affecting the combatants far more than they have power to affect one another.
But as interesting as life is when looked at through this formula, doesn’t the formula influence our perspective just like the glass we imagined, which shows us the solid things and the changes happening in a fire, but keeps the true cause hidden from view? One doesn't need to deny the reality of the struggle for survival, or that its outcomes are significant. We compete with each other and impact each other for better or for worse, sometimes beyond measure. However, we don’t fight in isolation. Let Isaiah's vision complement our feelings. We exist in an environment that influences every one of us much more strongly than the conflicting wits or wills of others. Surrounding us and flowing through us, both inside and out as we fight, is the constant righteousness of God; and more often, it’s this that we see reflected in the ups and downs of life than the impacts of our struggles with one another, no matter how vast those may be. In this regard, there is a clear similarity between our time and Isaiah's time. Back then, the politicians of Judah, looking through their distorted lens at life, declared, Life is merely a battle where the strongest win, a game for the most clever. So they formed their alliances, ready to confront the Assyrians, or they fled in fear depending on whether Egypt or the Assyrians seemed more powerful. Isaiah recognized that alongside the Assyrians and Jews, another power was at play—the true reason behind every political change, collapse, or crisis in either empire—the active righteousness of God. Assyrians and Jews had to contend not only with each other but also with Him. We can see clearly now that Isaiah was right. Far more influential than the schemes of politicians or the arrogance of Assyria, which were used merely as tools and fuel, was the law of righteousness, the spiritual force that is as invisible as the air yet powerful enough to refine and test like a furnace heated seven times. And Isaiah is just as right for today. When we view life through our trendy formula, it does seem to be filled with struggles, where we occasionally catch a glimpse of righteous decisions, but we hastily attribute the prevailing lawlessness to the reasons for everything that occurs, especially to excuse our own failures. We are mistaken. Righteousness isn’t a sporadic spark; it’s the very atmosphere we exist in. Even though our dull eyes see it only occasionally erupt in the heat of life’s battles, mistaking it for mere flashes of cleverness or weapons clashing, God’s justice is everywhere, all-encompassing and relentless, impacting the fighters far more than they can impact each other.
We shall best learn the truth of this in the way the sinners in Jerusalem learned it—each man first looking into himself. Who among us shall dwell with the everlasting burnings? Can we attribute all our defeats to the opposition that was upon us at the moment they occurred? When our temper failed, when our charity relaxed, when our resoluteness gave way, was it the hotness of debate, was it the pressure of the crowd, was it the sneer of the scorner, that was to blame? We all know that these were only the occasions of our defeats. Conscience tells us that the cause lay in a slothful or self-indulgent heart, which the corrosive atmosphere of Divine righteousness had been consuming, and which, sapped and hollow by its effect, gave way at every material shock.
We’ll best understand this truth the same way the sinners in Jerusalem did—each person first looking inside themselves. Who among us can stand in the presence of everlasting fires? Can we really blame all our failures on the opposition we faced at the time? When we lost our temper, when our kindness faded, when our determination slipped, was it the intensity of the debate, the pressure from the crowd, or the sneer of the cynic that caused it? We all know these were just the circumstances of our failures. Deep down, we know the real issue was a lazy or indulgent heart, which the harsh light of Divine righteousness was eating away at, and which, weakened and hollowed by its influence, crumbled with every challenge it faced.
With the knowledge that conscience gives us, let us now look at a kind of figure which must be within the horizon of all of us. Once it was the most commanding stature among its fellows, the straight back and broad brow of a king of men. But now what is the last sight of him that will remain with us, flung out there against the evening skies of his life? A bent back (we speak of character), a stooping face, the shrinking[342] outlines of a man ready to collapse. It was not the struggle for existence that killed him, for he was born to prevail in it. It was the atmosphere that told on him. He carried in him that on which the atmosphere could not but tell. A low selfishness or passion inhabited him, and became the predominant part of him, so that his outward life was only its shell; and when the fire of God at last pierced this, he was as thorns cut down, that are burned in the fire.
With the understanding that our conscience provides, let’s now consider a figure that should be within reach of all of us. Once, he stood tall among his peers, with the straight posture and broad forehead of a leader. But now, what’s the last image of him that will stick with us, silhouetted against the sunset of his life? A hunched back (we're talking about character), a drooping face, the diminishing outlines of a man on the verge of breaking down. It wasn't the fight for survival that took him down; he was meant to succeed in that. It was the environment that wore him down. He carried within him the weight that couldn't help but affect him. A deep selfishness or desire lived inside him and became the dominant aspect of his being, so that his external life was merely a shell; and when the fire of God finally broke through this shell, he was like thorns cut down and burned in the fire.
We can explain much with the outward eye, but the most of the explanation lies beyond. Where our knowledge of a man's life ends, the great meaning of it often only begins. All the vacancy beyond the outline we see is full of that meaning. God is there, and God is a consuming fire. Let us not seek to explain lives only by what we see of them, the visible strife of man with man and nature. It is the invisible that contains the secret of what is seen. We see the shoulders stoop, but not the burden upon them; the face darken, but look in vain for what casts the shadow; the light sparkle in the eye, but cannot tell what star of hope its glance has caught. And even so when we behold fortune and character go down in the warfare of this world, we ought to remember that it is not always the things we see that are to blame for the fall, but that awful flame which, unseen by common man, has been revealed to the prophets of God.
We can explain a lot with what we observe, but most of the explanation is beyond our sight. Where our understanding of a person's life ends, the deeper meaning often begins. All the emptiness beyond the visible outline is filled with that meaning. God is present, and God is a consuming fire. We shouldn’t just try to explain lives based on what we see— the visible struggles of people against each other and nature. It’s the invisible that holds the key to what we see. We notice the shoulders sagging but not the weight they're carrying; the face may darken, but we search in vain for what casts the shadow; the light might sparkle in the eye, but we can’t tell which star of hope its glance has caught. And similarly, when we see fortunes and characters crumble in the battles of this world, we should remember that it’s not always the visible factors that cause the fall, but that terrible flame which, unseen by the average person, has been revealed to the prophets of God.
Righteousness and retribution, then, are an atmosphere—not lines or laws that we may happen to stumble upon, not explosives, that, being touched, burst out on us, but the atmosphere—always about us and always at work, invisible and yet more mighty than aught we see. God, in whom we live and move and have our being, is a consuming fire.
Righteousness and retribution are like an atmosphere—not rules or laws we accidentally come across, not like explosives that go off when handled, but the atmosphere itself—always around us and always at work, invisible yet more powerful than anything we see. God, in whom we live and move and have our being, is a consuming fire.
CHAPTER XXII.
THE RABSHAKEH; OR, LAST TEMPTATIONS OF FAITH.
Isaiah xxxvi. (701 B.C.).
Isaiah 36. (701 B.C.).
It remains for us now to follow in chaps. xxxvi., xxxvii., the historical narrative of the events, the moral results of which we have seen so vivid in chap. xxxiii.—the perfidious return of the Assyrians to Jerusalem after Hezekiah had bought them off and their final disappearance from the Holy Land.
It’s now our task to follow in chaps. xxxvi., xxxvii., the historical account of the events, the moral implications of which we’ve witnessed so clearly in chap. xxxiii.—the treacherous return of the Assyrians to Jerusalem after Hezekiah had bribed them, and their eventual departure from the Holy Land.
This historical narrative has also its moral. It is not annals, but drama. The whole moral of Isaiah's prophesying is here flung into a duel between champions of the two tempers, which we have seen in perpetual conflict throughout his book. The two tempers are—on Isaiah's side an absolute and unselfish faith in God, Sovereign of the world and Saviour of His people; on the side of the Assyrians a bare, brutal confidence in themselves, in human cleverness and success, a vaunting contempt of righteousness and of pity. The main interest of Isaiah's book has consisted in the way these tempers oppose each other, and alternately influence the feeling of the Jewish community. That interest is now to culminate in the scene which brings near such thorough representatives of the two tempers as Isaiah and the Rabshakeh, with the crowd of wavering Jews between. Most strikingly, Assyria's last assault is not of force, but of speech, delivering upon faith the subtle arguments of the worldly[344] temper; and as strikingly, while all official religion and power of State stand helpless against them, these arguments are met by the bare word of God. In this mere statement of the situation, however, we perceive that much more than the quarrel of a single generation is being decided. This scene is a parable of the everlasting struggle between faith and force, with doubt and despair between them. In the clever, self-confident, persuasive personage with two languages on his tongue and an army at his back; in the fluttered representatives of official religion who meet him and are afraid of the effect of his speech on the common people; in the ranks of dispirited men who hear the dialogue from the wall; in the sensitive king so aware of faith, and yet so helpless to bring faith forth to peace and triumph; and, in the background of the whole situation, the serene prophet of God, grasping only God's word, and by his own steadfastness carrying the city over the crisis and proving that faith indeed can be the substance of things hoped for—we have a phase of the struggle ordained unto every generation of men, and which is as fresh to-day as when Rabshakeh played the cynic and the scribes and elders filled the part of nervous defenders of the faith, under the walls of faith's fortress, two thousand five hundred years ago.
This historical story also has its lesson. It's not just a record of events, but a drama. The main message of Isaiah's prophecies is showcased in a clash between the champions of two opposing attitudes, which we've seen in constant conflict throughout his writings. On Isaiah's side is a complete and selfless faith in God, the ruler of the world and savior of His people; on the side of the Assyrians is a raw, brutal self-confidence, relying on human cleverness and success, showing blatant disregard for righteousness and compassion. The main interest of Isaiah's book lies in the way these attitudes confront each other and influence the feelings of the Jewish community. This interest reaches its peak in the dramatic moment with two strong representatives of these attitudes: Isaiah and the Rabshakeh, with the uncertain Jewish crowd caught in between. Notably, Assyria's final assault is not one of violence, but of words, launching clever arguments against faith; and strikingly, while all formal religion and state power seem powerless against them, these arguments are countered by the simple word of God. In this straightforward depiction of the situation, we see that much more than the conflict of a single generation is being settled. This moment symbolizes the ongoing battle between faith and force, with doubt and despair caught in the middle. In the clever, self-assured, persuasive figure who speaks two languages and has an army behind him; in the flustered representatives of official religion who confront him but fear his words' influence on the common people; in the ranks of discouraged men listening from the walls; in the sensitive king who knows about faith but cannot muster it to achieve peace and victory; and in the backdrop of it all, the calm prophet of God, holding onto God's word, who, by his unwavering faith, guides the city through this crisis and demonstrates that faith can truly be the substance of things hoped for—we witness a scenario of a struggle that every generation of people faces, which feels as relevant today as it did when Rabshakeh played the cynic and the scribes and elders acted as anxious defenders of the faith, under the walls of faith's fortress, twenty-five hundred years ago.
The Rabshakeh.
The Rabshakeh.
This word is a Hebrew transliteration of the Assyrian Rab-sak, chief of the officers. Though there is some doubt on the point, we may naturally presume from the duties he here discharges that the Rabshakeh was a civilian—probably the civil commissioner or political officer attached to the Assyrian army, which was commanded,[345] according to 2 Kings xviii. 16, by the Tartan or commander-in-chief himself.
This word is a Hebrew transliteration of the Assyrian Rab-sak, chief of the officers. Although there’s some uncertainty about this, we can reasonably assume from the responsibilities he has here that the Rabshakeh was a civilian—most likely the civil commissioner or political officer connected to the Assyrian army, which was commanded,[345] according to 2 Kings xviii. 16, by the Tartan or the commander-in-chief himself.
In all the Bible there is not a personage more clever than this Rabshakeh, nor more typical. He was an able deputy of the king who sent him, but he represented still more thoroughly the temper of the civilisation to which he belonged. There is no word of this man which is not characteristic. A clever, fluent diplomatist, with the traveller's knowledge of men and the conqueror's contempt for them, the Rabshakeh is the product of a victorious empire like the Assyrian, or, say, like the British. Our services sometimes turn out the like of him—a creature able to speak to natives in their own language, full and ready of information, mastering the surface of affairs at a glance, but always baffled by the deeper tides which sway nations; a deft player upon party interests and the superficial human passions, but unfit to touch the deep springs of men's religion and patriotism. Let us speak, however, with respect of the Rabshakeh. From his rank (Sayce calls him the Vizier), as well as from the cleverness with which he explains what we know to have been the policy of Sennacherib towards the populations of Syria, he may well have been the inspiring mind at this time of the great Assyrian empire—Sennacherib's Bismarck.
In the entire Bible, there isn’t a character more clever than this Rabshakeh, nor is there anyone more emblematic. He was a skilled representative of the king who sent him, but he even more accurately reflected the mindset of the civilization he came from. Every word from this man is telling. A clever and smooth diplomat, with the insight of a traveler and the disdain of a conqueror for those he addresses, Rabshakeh embodies a victorious empire, like the Assyrian or, let's say, like the British. Occasionally, our services produce individuals like him—someone who can speak to locals in their own language, rich in information, able to grasp the surface of issues at a glance, yet consistently puzzled by the deeper currents that influence nations; a skilled manipulator of party interests and shallow human emotions, but unqualified to engage with the fundamental principles of people’s faith and patriotism. However, we should acknowledge Rabshakeh with respect. Given his rank (Sayce refers to him as the Vizier), and the skill with which he articulates Sennacherib's policies towards the people of Syria, he could very well have been a key figure in the great Assyrian empire at that time—Sennacherib’s Bismarck.
The Rabshakeh had strutted down from the great centre of civilisation, with its temper upon him, and all its great resources at his back, confident to twist these poor provincial tribes round his little finger. How petty he conceived them we infer from his never styling Hezekiah the king. This was to be an occasion for the Rabshakeh's own glorification. Jerusalem was to fall to his clever speeches. He had indeed the army[346] behind him, but the work to be done was not the rough work of soldiers. All was to be managed by him, the civilian and orator. This fellow, with his two languages and clever address, was to step out in front of the army and finish the whole business.
The Rabshakeh had strut down from the heart of civilization, with a chip on his shoulder and all its resources backing him, confident that he could manipulate these poor provincial tribes easily. His disdain for them is evident in the fact that he never referred to Hezekiah as the king. This was meant to be a moment for the Rabshakeh's own self-aggrandizement. Jerusalem was supposed to fall to his clever words. He had the army[346] behind him, but this was not a job for soldiers. Everything was to be handled by him, the civilian and speaker. This guy, with his two languages and smooth delivery, was set to step out in front of the army and wrap everything up.
The Rabshakeh spoke extremely well. With his first words he touched the sore point of Judah's policy: her trust in Egypt. On this he spoke like a very Isaiah. But he showed a deeper knowledge of Judah's internal affairs, and a subtler deftness in using it, when he referred to the matter of the altars. Hezekiah had abolished the high places in all parts of the land, and gathered the people to the central sanctuary in Jerusalem. The Assyrian knew that a number of Jews must look upon this disestablishment of religion in the provinces as likely to incur Jehovah's displeasure and turn Him against them. Therefore he said, But if thou say unto me, We trust in Jehovah our God, is not that He whose high places and whose altars Hezekiah hath taken away, and hath said to Judah and to Jerusalem, Ye shall worship before this altar? And then, having shaken their religious confidence, he made sport of their military strength. And finally he boldly asserted, Jehovah said unto me, Go up against this land and destroy it. All this shows a master in diplomacy, a most clever demagogue. The scribes and elders felt the edge, and begged him to sheathe it in a language unknown to the common people. But he, conscious of his power, spoke the more boldly, addressing himself directly to the poorer sort of the garrison, on whom the siege would press most heavily. His second speech to them is a good illustration of the policy pursued by Assyria at this time towards the cities of Palestine. We know from the annals of Sennacherib that his customary policy, to seduce the populations of a hostile State[347] from allegiance to their rulers, had succeeded in other cases; and it was so plausibly uttered in this case, that it seemed likely to succeed again. To the common soldiers on the walls, with the prospect of being reduced to the foul rations of a prolonged siege (ver. 12), Sennacherib's ambassador offers rich and equal property and enjoyment. Make a treaty with me, and come out to me, and eat every one of his vine and every one of his fig tree, and drink ye every one of the water of his cistern, until I come and take you away to a land like your own land, a land of corn and grapes, a land of bread-corn and orchards. Every one!—it is a most subtle assault upon the discipline, comradeship and patriotism of the common soldiers by the promises of a selfish, sensuous equality and individualism. But then the speaker's native cynicism gets the better of him—it is not possible for an Assyrian long to play the part of clemency—and, with a flash of scorn, he asks the sad men upon the walls whether they really believe that Jehovah can save them: Hath any of the gods of the nations delivered his land out of the hand of the King of Assyria, ... that Jehovah should deliver Jerusalem out of my hand? All the range of their feelings does he thus run through, seeking with sharp words to snap each cord of faith in God, of honour to the king and love of country. Had the Jews heart to answer him, they might point out the inconsistency between his claim to have been sent by Jehovah and the contempt he now pours upon their God. But the inconsistency is characteristic. The Assyrian has some acquaintance with the Jewish faith; he makes use of its articles when they serve his purpose, but his ultimatum is to tear them to shreds in their believers' faces. He treats the Jews as men of culture still sometimes treat barbarians, first scornfully[348] humouring their faith and then savagely trampling it under foot.
The Rabshakeh spoke very eloquently. With his first words, he hit the sore spot of Judah's policy: their trust in Egypt. He sounded like a true Isaiah in this regard. But he demonstrated a deeper understanding of Judah's internal issues and a more subtle skill in using it when he mentioned the altars. Hezekiah had abolished the high places throughout the land and had gathered the people at the central sanctuary in Jerusalem. The Assyrian knew that many Jews might view this removal of religious sites in the provinces as likely to anger Jehovah and turn Him against them. So he said, But if you say to me, We trust in Jehovah our God, isn't He the one whose high places and altars Hezekiah has taken away, and has told Judah and Jerusalem, You shall worship before this altar? After shaking their religious confidence, he mocked their military strength. Finally, he boldly declared, Jehovah said to me, Go up against this land and destroy it. All of this shows a master of diplomacy, a very clever demagogue. The scribes and elders felt the impact and asked him to tone it down to a language the common people wouldn't understand. But he, aware of his power, spoke even more boldly, directly addressing the poorer soldiers of the garrison, who would suffer the most from the siege. His second speech to them serves as a good example of the policy Assyria had at that time toward the cities of Palestine. We know from the records of Sennacherib that his usual tactic of seducing the populations of a hostile state[347] from loyalty to their rulers had worked in other cases, and it was presented so plausibly here that it seemed likely to work again. To the common soldiers on the walls, faced with the prospect of being fed the horrible rations of a prolonged siege (ver. 12), Sennacherib’s ambassador offered them the promise of ample and equal wealth and enjoyment. Make a treaty with me, come out to me, and everyone can eat from his vine and his fig tree, and drink from the water of his cistern, until I come and take you to a land like your own, a land of grain and grapes, a land of bread and orchards. Everyone! — it’s a clever attack on the discipline, camaraderie, and patriotism of the common soldiers through promises of selfish, indulgent equality and individualism. But then the speaker's natural cynicism gets the best of him — it’s not possible for an Assyrian to maintain a façade of kindness for long — and, with a flash of scorn, he asks the sad men on the walls whether they really believe that Jehovah can save them: Has any of the gods of the nations delivered his land from the hand of the King of Assyria,... that Jehovah should deliver Jerusalem from my hand? He goes through all their feelings, using sharp words to try to cut each cord of faith in God, loyalty to the king, and love for their country. If the Jews had the courage to respond, they might point out the contradiction between his claim to be sent by Jehovah and the contempt he now shows for their God. But the contradiction is typical. The Assyrian seems to have some knowledge of the Jewish faith; he uses its tenets when they serve his purpose, but his ultimate goal is to tear them apart right in front of the believers. He treats the Jews like cultured people sometimes treat those they view as lesser, first condescendingly indulging their beliefs and then brutally trampling them underfoot.
So clever were the speeches of the Rabshakeh. We see why he was appointed to this mission. He was an expert both in the language and religion of this tribe, perched on its rock in the remote Judæan highlands. For a foreigner he showed marvellous familiarity with the temper and internal jealousies of the Jewish religion. He turned these on each other almost as adroitly as Paul himself did in the disputes between Sadducees and Pharisees. How the fellow knew his cleverness, strutting there betwixt army and town! He would show his soldier friends the proper way of dealing with stubborn barbarians. He would astonish those faith-proud highlanders by exhibiting how much he was aware of the life behind their thick walls and silent faces, for the king's commandment was, Answer him not.
The speeches of the Rabshakeh were so clever. It's clear why he was chosen for this mission. He was an expert in both the language and religion of this group, situated in its stronghold in the remote Judean highlands. As a foreigner, he displayed remarkable familiarity with the mood and internal conflicts of the Jewish faith. He played them against each other almost as skillfully as Paul did in the debates between Sadducees and Pharisees. He was fully aware of his cleverness, strutting there between the army and the town! He would show his soldier friends the right way to handle stubborn locals. He would amaze those proud highlanders by demonstrating how much he understood about the life behind their thick walls and silent expressions, for the king's commandment was, Answer him not.
And yet did the Rabshakeh, with all his raking, know the heart of Judah? No, truly. The whole interest of this man is the incongruity of the expertness and surface-knowledge, which he spattered on Jerusalem's walls, with the deep secret of God, that, as some inexhaustible well, the fortress of the faith carried within her. Ah, Assyrian, there is more in starved Jerusalem than thou canst put in thy speeches! Suppose Heaven were to give those sharp eyes of thine power to look through the next thousand years, and see this race and this religion thou puffest at, the highest-honoured, hottest-hated of the world, centre of mankind's regard and debate, but thou, and thy king and all the glory of your empire wrapped deep in oblivion. To this little fortress of highland men shall the heart of great peoples turn: kings for its nursing-fathers and queens for its nursing-mothers, the forces of the[349] Gentiles shall come to it, and from it new civilisations take their laws; while thou and all thy paraphernalia disappear into blackness, haunted only by the antiquary, the world taking an interest in thee just in so far as thou didst once hopelessly attempt to understand Jerusalem and capture her faith by thine own interpretation of it. Curious pigmy, very grand thou thinkest thyself, and surely with some right as delegate of the king of kings, parading thy cleverness and thy bribes before these poor barbarians; but the world, called to look upon you both from this eminence of history, grants thee to be a very good head of an intelligence department, with a couple of languages on thy glib tongue's end, but adjudges that with the starved and speechless men before thee lies the secret of all that is worth living and dying for in this world.
And yet did the Rabshakeh, with all his boasting, know the heart of Judah? No, not at all. This man's whole focus is the contradiction between the expertise and shallow knowledge he threw at Jerusalem’s walls, and the deep secret of God, which the fortress of faith holds within. Ah, Assyrian, there is so much more in struggling Jerusalem than you can express in your speeches! Imagine if Heaven gave you the power to see into the next thousand years and witness this race and this religion you mock, the most respected, most hated in the world, the center of humanity’s attention and debate, while you, your king, and all the glory of your empire fade into oblivion. To this little fortress of highland people shall the hearts of great nations turn: kings as its guardians and queens as its protectors; the forces of the[349] Gentiles shall come to it, and from it new civilizations will take their laws; while you and all your trappings vanish into darkness, remembered only by antiquarians, with the world showing interest in you only to the extent that you once futilely tried to understand Jerusalem and seize her faith through your own lens. Curious little man, you think very highly of yourself, and perhaps you have some reason to as a representative of the king of kings, flaunting your cleverness and bribes in front of these poor people; but from this high ground of history, the world sees you as a decent head of an intelligence department, fluent in a couple of languages, while recognizing that the real secret of everything worth living and dying for lies with the malnourished and speechless men before you.
The Rabshakeh's plausible futility and Jerusalem's faith, greatly distressed before him, are typical. Still as men hang moodily over the bulwarks of Zion, doubtful whether life is worth living within the narrow limits which religion prescribes, or righteousness worth fighting for with such privations and hope deferred, comes upon them some elegant and plausible temptation, loudly calling to give the whole thing up. Disregarding the official arguments and evidences that push forward to parley, it speaks home in practical tones to men's real selves—their appetites and selfishnesses. "You are foolish fellows," it says, "to confine yourselves to such narrowness of life and self-denial! The fall of your faith is only a matter of time: other creeds have gone; yours must follow. And why fight the world for the sake of an idea, or from the habits of a discipline? Such things only starve the human spirit; and the[350] world is so generous, so free to every one, so tolerant of each enjoying his own, unhampered by authority or religion."
The Rabshakeh's seemingly pointless challenge and Jerusalem's faith, which is deeply troubled in front of him, are typical. As people lean gloomily over the walls of Zion, unsure if life is worth living within the strict boundaries set by religion, or if righteousness is worth fighting for amidst such hardships and delayed hopes, they encounter a tempting and persuasive call to abandon it all. Ignoring the official arguments and evidence urging them to negotiate, this temptation speaks directly to people's true selves—their desires and selfishness. "You're being foolish," it says, "to limit yourselves to such a narrow life and self-denial! The downfall of your faith is just a matter of time: other beliefs have faded; yours will too. And why should you struggle against the world for the sake of an idea or out of habit? Such things only starve the human spirit; and the world is so generous, so free for everyone, so tolerant of each person enjoying their own life, unrestricted by authority or religion."
In our day what has the greatest effect on the faith of many men is just this mixture, that pervades the Rabshakeh's address,—of a superior culture pretending to expose religion, with the easy generosity, which offers to the individual a selfish life, unchecked by any discipline or religious fear. That modern Rabshakeh, Ernest Rénan, with the forces of historical criticism at his back, but confident rather in his own skill of address, speaking to us believers as poor picturesque provincials, patronising our Deity, and telling us that he knows His intentions better than we do ourselves, is a very good representative of the enemies of the Faith, who owe their impressiveness upon common men to the familiarity they display with the contents of the Faith, and the independent, easy life they offer to the man who throws his strict faith off. Superior knowledge, with the offer on its lips of a life on good terms with the rich and tolerant world—pretence of science promising selfishness—that is to-day, as then under the walls of Jerusalem, the typical enemy of the Faith. But if faith be held simply as the silent garrison of Jerusalem held it, faith in a Lord God of righteousness, who has given us a conscience to serve Him, and has spoken to us in plain explanation of this by those whom we can see, understand and trust—not only by an Isaiah, but by a Jesus—then neither mere cleverness nor the ability to promise comfort can avail against our faith. A simple conscience of God and of duty may not be able to answer subtle arguments word for word, but she can feel the incongruity of their cleverness with her own precious[351] secret; she can at least expose the fallacy of their sensuous promises of an untroubled life. No man, who tempts us from a good conscience with God in the discipline of our religion and the comradeship of His people, can ensure that there will be no starvation in the pride of life, no captivity in the easy tolerance of the world. To the heart of man there will always be captivity in selfishness; there will always be exile in unbelief. Even where the romance and sentiment of faith are retained, after the manner of Rénan, it is only to mock us with mirage. As in a dry and thirsty land, where no water is, our heart and flesh shall cry out for the living God, as we have aforetime seen Him in the sanctuary. The land, in which the tempter promises a life undisturbed by religious restraints, is not our home, neither is it freedom. By the conscience that is in us, God has set us on the walls of faith, with His law to observe, with His people to stand by; and against us are the world and its tempters, with all their wiles to be defied. If we go down from the charge and shelter of so simple a religion, then, whatever enjoyment we have, we shall enjoy it only with the fears of the deserter and the greed of the slave.
In today's world, what most influences the faith of many people is this blend found in the Rabshakeh's speech—where superior culture tries to undermine religion, paired with an easygoing attitude that offers individuals a self-centered life free from any discipline or religious concern. That modern advocate, Ernest Rénan, supported by the power of historical criticism but relying more on his own rhetorical skills, talks to us believers like we're simple, quaint locals, patronizing our God and claiming he understands His intentions better than we do ourselves. He perfectly represents the enemies of Faith, whose impact on ordinary people comes from their familiarity with faith's contents and the independent, carefree life they promote for those who shed their strict beliefs. Knowledge that appears superior, coupled with the promise of a lifestyle that aligns with the wealthy and accepting world—this pretense of science that encourages selfishness—is today, just as it was under the walls of Jerusalem, the common adversary of Faith. However, if faith is understood as the quiet stronghold of Jerusalem, believing in a Lord God of righteousness who has given us a conscience to serve Him and has communicated this clearly through those we can see, understand, and trust—not just through an Isaiah, but through a Jesus—then neither mere cleverness nor the ability to promise comfort can shake our faith. A simple awareness of God and duty may struggle to counter clever arguments one-on-one, but it can sense the disconnect between their cleverness and her own precious secret; at the very least, it can reveal the fallacy of their enticing promises of an easy life. No one who lures us away from a good conscience with God through our religious discipline and the fellowship of His people can guarantee a life free from pride's starving effects or the captivity of worldly tolerance. For the human heart, selfishness will always mean captivity; unbelief will always bring exile. Even when the romance and sentiment of faith linger, as Rénan describes, it only serves to mock us with illusions. As in a dry and thirsty land, where no water is, our heart and flesh shall cry out for the living God, as we have seen Him in the sanctuary before. The land where the tempter offers a life free from religious restrictions is not our true home, nor does it offer freedom. By the conscience within us, God has positioned us on the walls of faith, with His law to follow and His people to support us; and against us stand the world and its temptations, with all their schemes to be resisted. If we abandon the charge and refuge of such simple faith, whatever pleasure we find will come with the fears of a deserter and the greed of a slave.
In spite of scorn and sensuous promise from Rabshakeh to Rénan, let us lift the hymn which these silent Jews at last lifted from the walls of their delivered city: Walk about Zion and go round about her; tell ye the towers thereof. Mark ye well her bulwarks, and consider her palaces, that ye may tell it to the generation to come. For this God is our God for ever and ever. He will be our Guide even unto death.
In spite of the mockery and enticing promises from Rabshakeh to Rénan, let’s sing the hymn that these quiet Jews finally raised from the walls of their freed city: Walk around Zion and explore it; tell about its towers. Pay close attention to its defenses and think about its palaces, so you can pass it on to the next generation. For this God is our God forever and ever. He will be our Guide even to death.
CHAPTER XXIII.
THIS IS THE VICTORY.... OUR FAITH.
Isaiah xxxvii. (701 B.C.).
Isaiah xxxvii. (701 B.C.E.).
Within the fortress of the faith there is only silence and embarrassment. We pass from the Rabshakeh, posing outside the walls of Zion, to Hezekiah, prostrate within them. We pass with the distracted councillors, by the walls crowded with moody and silent soldiers, many of them—if this be the meaning of the king's command that they should not parley—only too ready to yield to the plausible infidel. We are astonished. Has faith nothing to say for herself? Have this people of so long Divine inspiration no habit of self-possession, no argument in answer to the irrelevant attacks of their enemy? Where are the traditions of Moses and Joshua, the songs of Deborah and David? Can men walk about Zion, and their very footsteps on her walls ring out no defiance?
Within the fortress of faith, there's just silence and embarrassment. We move from the Rabshakeh, standing outside the walls of Zion, to Hezekiah, laid low within them. We go alongside the distracted advisors, past the walls filled with moody and silent soldiers, many of whom—if the king's order not to negotiate means anything—are all too ready to give in to the persuasive infidel. We're astonished. Does faith have nothing to say for itself? Does this long-inspirited people not have any composure, no arguments in response to their enemy's irrelevant attacks? Where are the traditions of Moses and Joshua, the songs of Deborah and David? Can people walk around Zion, and not even their footsteps on her walls let out a challenge?
Hezekiah's complaint reminds us that in this silence and distress we have no occasional perplexity of faith, but her perpetual burden. Faith is inarticulate because of her greatness. Faith is courageous and imaginative; but can she convert her confidence and visions into fact? Said Hezekiah, This is a day of trouble, and rebuke and contumely, for the children are[353] come to the birth, and there is not strength to bring them forth. These words are not a mere metaphor for anguish. They are the definition of a real miscarriage. In Isaiah's contemporaries faith has at last engendered courage, zeal for God's house and strong assurance of victory; but she, that has proved fertile to conceive and carry these confidences, is powerless to bring them forth into real life, to transform them to actual fact. Faith, complains Hezekiah, is not the substance of things hoped for. At the moment when her subjective assurances ought to be realized as facts, she is powerless to bring them to the birth.
Hezekiah's complaint reminds us that in this silence and distress we don't just face occasional doubts about our faith, but rather a constant struggle. Faith is hard to express because of its depth. Faith is brave and full of imagination, but can it turn its confidence and visions into reality? Hezekiah said, This is a day of trouble, rebuke, and contempt, for the children are[353] ready to be born, and there is not enough strength to deliver them. These words are not just a metaphor for pain; they define a real failure. In Isaiah's time, faith finally sparked courage, passion for God's house, and strong confidence in victory; yet, the faith that was capable of nurturing and carrying these beliefs now struggles to bring them into reality, to turn them into actual facts. Faith, Hezekiah laments, is not the reality of things hoped for. At the moment when her inner assurances should be realized as facts, she is unable to bring them to fruition.
It is a miscarriage we are always deploring. Wordsworth has said, "Through love, through hope, through faith's transcendent dower, we feel that we are greater than we know." Yes, greater than we can articulate, greater than we can tell to men like the Rabshakeh, even though he talk the language of the Jews; and therefore, on the whole, it is best to be silent in face of his argument. But greater also, we sometimes fear, than we can realise to ourselves in actual character and victory. All life thrills with the pangs of inability to bring the children of faith to the birth of experience. The man, who has lost his faith or who takes his faith easily, never knows, of course, this anguish of Hezekiah. But the more we have fed on the promises of the Bible, the more that the Spirit of God has engendered in our pure hearts assurances of justice and of peace, the more we shall sometimes tremble with the fear that in outward fact there is no life for these beautiful conceptions of the soul. Do we really believe in the Fatherhood of God—believe in it till it has changed us inwardly, and we carry a new sense of destiny, a new conscience of justice, a new disgust of sin, a new pity[354] for pain? Then how full of the anguish of impotence must our souls feel when they consciously survey one day of common life about us, or when we honestly look back on a year of our own conduct! Does it not seem as if upon one or two hideous streets in some centre of our civilisation all Christianity, with its eighteen hundred years of promise and impetus, had gone to wreck? Is God only for the imagination of man? Is there no God outwardly to control and grant victory? Is He only a Voice, and not the Creator? Is Christ only a Prophet, and not the King?
It’s a loss we constantly mourn. Wordsworth said, "Through love, through hope, through faith's amazing gift, we feel that we are greater than we realize." Yes, greater than we can express, greater than we can convey to people like the Rabshakeh, even if he speaks the language of the Jews; and so, overall, it’s better to stay quiet in response to his argument. But we also sometimes worry that we’re greater than we can understand about ourselves in terms of true character and achievement. All of life is filled with the pain of being unable to help the children of faith reach the experience of discovery. The person who has lost their faith or who takes their faith lightly never knows, of course, this distress of Hezekiah. But the more we have drawn from the promises of the Bible, the more the Spirit of God has instilled in our pure hearts beliefs in justice and peace, the more we may sometimes be anxious that in reality there’s no life for these beautiful ideas of the soul. Do we truly believe in the Fatherhood of God—believe in it until it transforms us inside, giving us a new sense of purpose, a new awareness of justice, a new aversion to sin, a new compassion for suffering? Then how filled with the agony of powerlessness must our souls feel when they consciously examine just one day of ordinary life around us, or when we honestly reflect on a year of our own actions! Doesn’t it seem as if, in one or two terrible streets in the heart of our civilization, all Christianity, with its eighteen hundred years of promise and motivation, has come to ruin? Is God just a concept in the mind of man? Is there no God out there to control and grant victory? Is He just a Voice, and not the Creator? Is Christ merely a Prophet, and not the King?
And then over these disappointments there faces us all the great miscarriage itself—black, inevitable death. Hezekiah cried from despair that the Divine assurance of the permanence of God's people in the world was about to be wrecked on fact. But often by a deathbed we utter the same lament about the individual's immortality. There is everything to prove a future life except the fact of it within human experience. This life is big with hopes, instincts, convictions of immortality; and yet where within our sight have these ever passed to the birth of fact?[65] Death is a great miscarriage. The children have come to the birth, and there is not strength to bring them forth.
And then, on top of these disappointments, we all face the ultimate loss—black, unavoidable death. Hezekiah cried out in despair that the promise of God’s people enduring in the world was about to be shattered by reality. But often, by a deathbed, we express the same sorrow about a person’s immortality. There’s everything to support the idea of an afterlife except actual evidence of it in human experience. This life is filled with hopes, instincts, and beliefs in immortality; and yet, where have these ever resulted in real proof?[65] Death is a great failure. The children have come to the birth, and there is not enough strength to bring them forth.
And yet within the horizon of this life at least—the latter part of the difficulty we postpone to another chapter—faith is the substance of things hoped for, as Isaiah did now most brilliantly prove. For the miracle of Jerusalem's deliverance, to which the narrative proceeds, was not that by faith the prophet foretold it, but that by faith he did actually himself succeed in bringing it to pass. The miracle, we say, was not that[355] Isaiah made accurate prediction of the city's speedy relief from the Assyrian, but far more that upon his solitary steadfastness, without aid of battle, he did carry her disheartened citizens through this crisis of temptation, and kept them, though silent, to their walls till the futile Assyrian drifted away. The prediction, indeed, was not, although its terms appear exact, so very marvellous for a prophet to make, who had Isaiah's religious conviction that Jerusalem must survive and Isaiah's practical acquaintance with the politics of the day. Behold, I am setting in him a spirit; and he shall hear a rumour, and shall return into his own land. We may recall the parallel case of Charlemagne in his campaign against the Moors in Spain, from which he was suddenly and unseasonably hastened north on a disastrous retreat by news of the revolt of the Saxons.[66] In the vast Assyrian territories rebellions were constantly occurring, that demanded the swift appearance of the king himself; and God's Spirit, to whose inspiration Isaiah traced all political perception, suggested to him the possibility of one of these. In the end, the Bible story implies that it was not a rumour from some far-away quarter so much as a disaster here in[356] Syria, which compelled Sennacherib's "retreat from Moscow." But it is possible that both causes were at work, and that as Napoleon offered the receipt of news from Paris as his reason for hurriedly abandoning the unfortunate Spanish campaign of 1808, so Sennacherib made the rumour of some news from his capital or the north the occasion for turning his troops from a theatre of war, where they had not met with unequivocal success, and had at last been half destroyed by the plague. Isaiah's further prediction of Sennacherib's death must also be taken in a general sense, for it was not till twenty years later that the Assyrian tyrant met this violent end: I will cause him to fall by the sword in his own land. But do not let us waste our attention on the altogether minor point of the prediction of Jerusalem's deliverance, when the great wonder, of which the prediction is but an episode, lies lengthened and manifest before us—that Isaiah, when all the defenders of Jerusalem were distracted and her king prostrate, did by the single steadfastness of his spirit sustain her inviolate, and procure for her people a safe and glorious future.
And yet within the scope of this life at least—the latter part of the challenge we’ll save for another chapter—faith is the substance of things hoped for, as Isaiah has now brilliantly demonstrated. The miracle of Jerusalem's deliverance, which the narrative goes on to describe, wasn’t that the prophet foretold it by faith, but that through faith he actually succeeded in making it happen. The miracle, we say, wasn’t that[355] Isaiah accurately predicted the city's quick relief from the Assyrians, but rather that through his unwavering determination, without any battle aid, he guided her discouraged citizens through this crisis of temptation and kept them, though silent, at their walls until the ineffective Assyrian army drifted away. The prediction itself, while it seems precise, wasn’t all that impressive for a prophet like Isaiah, who had a strong belief that Jerusalem would survive and was familiar with the politics of the time. Behold, I am setting in him a spirit; and he shall hear a rumor, and shall return to his own land. We might recall the similar situation of Charlemagne in his campaign against the Moors in Spain, which he abruptly and inconveniently abandoned due to news of a Saxon revolt. [66] In the vast Assyrian territories, rebellions were constantly breaking out, demanding the swift return of the king himself; and God’s Spirit, which Isaiah credited for all political insight, suggested to him the possibility of one of these. Ultimately, the Bible story suggests that it was not merely a rumor from a distant place but rather a disaster occurring in[356] Syria that prompted Sennacherib's "retreat from Moscow." It’s possible that both factors were in play, and just as Napoleon cited news from Paris as his reason for hastily withdrawing from the unfortunate Spanish campaign of 1808, Sennacherib may have used the rumor of news from his capital or the north as a reason to pull his troops from a battlefield where they hadn’t achieved clear success and had ultimately suffered greatly due to the plague. Isaiah's later prediction of Sennacherib's death should also be understood in a broader sense, as it wasn’t until twenty years later that the Assyrian tyrant met a violent end: I will cause him to fall by the sword in his own land. But let’s not get caught up on the relatively minor point of predicting Jerusalem's deliverance when the true wonder, of which the prediction is just a part, lies in the fact that Isaiah, when all the defenders of Jerusalem were distracted and her king was incapacitated, managed through the sheer strength of his spirit to keep her safe and secure, ensuring a bright and glorious future for her people.
The baffled Rabshakeh returned to his master, whom he found at Libnah, for he had heard that he had broken up from Lachish. Sennacherib, the narrative would seem to imply, did not trouble himself further about Jerusalem till he learned that Tirhakah, the Ethiopian ruler of Egypt, was marching to meet him with probably a stronger force than that which Sennacherib had defeated at Eltekeh. Then, feeling the danger of leaving so strong a fortress as Jerusalem in his rear, Sennacherib sent to Hezekiah one more demand for surrender. Hezekiah spread his enemy's letter before the Lord. His prayer that follows[357] is remarkable for two features, which enable us to see how pure and elevated a monotheism God's Spirit had at last developed from the national faith of Israel. The Being whom the king now seeks he addresses by the familiar name Jehovah of hosts, God of Israel, and describes by the physical figure—who art enthroned upon the cherubim. But he conceives of this God with the utmost loftiness and purity, ascribing to Him not only sovereignty and creatorship, but absolute singularity of Godhead. We have but to compare Hezekiah's prayer with the utterances of his predecessor Ahaz, to whom many gods were real, and none absolutely sovereign, or with the utterances of Israelites far purer than Ahaz, to whom the gods of the nations, though inferior to Jehovah, were yet real existences, in order to mark the spiritual advance made by Israel under Isaiah. It is a tribute to the prophet's force, which speaks volumes, when the deputation from Hezekiah talk to him of thy God (ver. 4). For Isaiah by his ministry had made Israel's God to be new in Israel's eyes.
The confused Rabshakeh went back to his boss, who was at Libnah, because he had heard that he was moving away from Lachish. It seems Sennacherib didn't worry about Jerusalem until he found out that Tirhakah, the Ethiopian leader of Egypt, was coming to confront him with possibly a stronger army than the one Sennacherib had beaten at Eltekeh. Then, realizing the risk of leaving such a powerful fortress as Jerusalem behind, Sennacherib sent Hezekiah one more demand to surrender. Hezekiah laid out his enemy's letter before the Lord. His subsequent prayer[357] is notable for two aspects, showing how pure and elevated a monotheism God's Spirit had finally crafted from Israel's national faith. The Being whom the king seeks is addressed by the familiar name Jehovah of hosts, God of Israel, and depicted as who is enthroned upon the cherubim. Yet he views this God with the utmost grandeur and purity, assigning not just sovereignty and creator status to Him, but complete uniqueness of divinity. Comparing Hezekiah's prayer with the statements of his predecessor Ahaz, for whom many gods were real and none were absolutely sovereign, or even with the beliefs of Israelites far purer than Ahaz, who regarded the nations' gods as real but inferior to Jehovah, highlights the spiritual progress made by Israel under Isaiah. It's a significant acknowledgment of the prophet's impact when the delegation from Hezekiah refers to thy God (ver. 4). Through his ministry, Isaiah had made Israel's God feel new to them.
Hezekiah's lofty prayer drew forth through the prophet an answer from Jehovah (vv. 21-32). This is one of the most brilliant of Isaiah's oracles. It is full of much, with which we are now familiar: the triumph of the inviolable fortress, the virgin daughter of Zion, and her scorn of the arrogant foe; the prophet's appreciation of Asshur's power and impetus, which only heightens his conviction that Asshur is but an instrument in the hand of God; the old figure of the enemy's sudden check as of a wild animal by hook and bridle; his inevitable retreat to the north. But these familiar ideas are flung off with a terseness and vivacity, which bear out the opinion that here we have a prophecy of Isaiah, not revised and elaborated for subsequent publication, like[358] the rest of his book, but in its original form, struck quickly forth to meet the city's sudden and urgent prayer.
Hezekiah's powerful prayer brought a response from Jehovah through the prophet (vv. 21-32). This is one of Isaiah's most striking oracles. It contains many concepts we're already familiar with: the victory of the unbeatable fortress, the virgin daughter of Zion, and her contempt for the arrogant enemy; the prophet's acknowledgment of Asshur's power and momentum, which only strengthens his belief that Asshur is merely a tool in God's hands; the classic image of the enemy being suddenly stopped, like a wild animal by a hook and bridle; and their unavoidable retreat to the north. But these familiar ideas are expressed with a sharpness and energy that support the view that this is an original prophecy from Isaiah, not revised and expanded for later publication, like[358] the rest of his book, but created quickly to respond to the city's urgent prayer.
The new feature of this prophecy is the sign added to it (ver. 30). This sign reminds us of that which in opposite terms described to Ahaz the devastation of Judah by the approaching Assyrians (chap. vii.). The wave of Assyrian war is about to roll away again, and Judah to resume her neglected agriculture, but not quite immediately. During this year of 701 it has been impossible, with the Assyrians in the land, to sow the seed, and the Jews have been dependent on the precarious crop of what had fallen from the harvest of the previous year and sown itself—saphîah, or aftergrowth. Next year, it being now too late to sow for next year's harvest, they must be content with the shahîs—wild corn, that which springs of itself. But the third year sow ye, and reap, and plant vineyards and eat the fruit thereof. Perhaps we ought not to interpret these numbers literally. The use of three gives the statement a formal and general aspect, as if the prophet only meant, It may be not quite at once that we get rid of the Assyrians; but when they do go, then they go for good, and you may till your land again without fear of their return. Then rings out the old promise, so soon now to be accomplished, about the escaped and the remnant; and the great pledge of the promise is once more repeated: The zeal of Jehovah of hosts will perform this. With this exclamation, as in ix. 7, the prophecy reaches a natural conclusion; and vv. 33-35 may have been uttered by Isaiah a little later, when he was quite sure that the Assyrian would not even attempt to repeat his abandoned blockade of Jerusalem.
The new aspect of this prophecy is the sign that has been added to it (ver. 30). This sign is a reminder of how the devastation of Judah by the approaching Assyrians was described to Ahaz in contrasting terms (chap. vii.). The wave of Assyrian warfare is about to recede, allowing Judah to return to their neglected farming, but not right away. During this year of 701, it has been impossible to sow seeds with the Assyrians in the land, and the Jews have relied on the uncertain harvest of what had fallen from the previous year's crops and germinated itself—saphîah, or aftergrowth. Next year, since it's too late to plant for the next harvest, they must settle for shahîs—wild corn, that which grows on its own. However, in the third year, they can sow, reap, plant vineyards, and enjoy the fruits. Perhaps we shouldn't take these numbers too literally. The use of three gives the statement a formal and general sense, as if the prophet meant to say, It might not be immediately that we get rid of the Assyrians; but when they leave, they will be gone for good, and you can farm your land again without worrying about their return. Then the old promise rings out, soon to be fulfilled, about the escaped and the remnant; and the great assurance of the promise is repeated: The zeal of Jehovah of hosts will accomplish this. With this declaration, as in ix. 7, the prophecy naturally concludes; and vv. 33-35 may have been spoken by Isaiah a bit later, when he was confident that the Assyrian would not even try to renew his abandoned blockade of Jerusalem.
At last in a single night the deliverance miraculously[359] came. It is implied by the scattered accounts of those days of salvation, that an Assyrian corps continued to sit before Jerusalem even after the Rabshakeh had returned to the headquarters of Sennacherib. The thirty-third of Isaiah, as well as those Psalms which celebrate the Assyrian's disappearance from Judah, describe it as having taken place from under the walls of Jerusalem and the astonished eyes of her guardians. It was not, however, upon this force—perhaps little more than a brigade of observation (xxxiii. 18)—that the calamity fell which drove Sennacherib so suddenly from Syria. And there went forth (that night, adds the book of Kings) the angel of Jehovah; and he smote in the camp of Assyria one hundred and eighty-five thousand; and when the camp arose in the morning, behold all of them were corpses, dead men. And Sennacherib, King of Assyria, broke up, and returned and dwelt in Nineveh. Had this pestilence dispersed the camp that lay before Jerusalem, and left beneath the walls so considerable a number of corpses, the exclamations of surprise at the sudden disappearance of Assyria, which occur in Isa. xxxiii. and in Psalms xlviii. and lxxvi., could hardly have failed to betray the fact. But these simply speak of vague trouble coming upon them that were assembled about Zion, and of their swift decampment. The trouble was the news of the calamity, whose victims were the main body of the Assyrian army, who had been making for the borders of Egypt, but were now scattered northwards like chaff.
At last, in a single night, the deliverance miraculously[359] came. Accounts from those days of salvation suggest that an Assyrian corps continued to camp outside Jerusalem even after the Rabshakeh had returned to Sennacherib's headquarters. Isaiah chapter thirty-three, along with the Psalms that celebrate the Assyrian's retreat from Judah, describe this event as happening right under the walls of Jerusalem and before the astonished eyes of its guardians. However, it wasn’t this force—likely just a brigade of observers (xxxiii. 18)—that experienced the calamity which caused Sennacherib to flee so suddenly from Syria. And there went forth (that night, the book of Kings adds) the angel of Jehovah; and he struck down in the camp of Assyria one hundred and eighty-five thousand; and when the camp broke up in the morning, behold, all of them were corpses, dead men. And Sennacherib, King of Assyria, broke camp, returned, and settled in Nineveh. If this plague had dispersed the camp outside Jerusalem, leaving so many corpses at the walls, the surprised exclamations about the sudden disappearance of Assyria noted in Isaiah xxxiii and in Psalms xlviii and lxxvi would certainly have revealed this fact. Instead, they simply mention vague trouble coming upon those gathered around Zion, and their swift retreat. This trouble was the news of the calamity, whose victims were the main body of the Assyrian army, which had been heading toward the borders of Egypt but was now scattered northward like chaff.
For details of this disaster we look in vain, of course, to the Assyrian annals, which only record Sennacherib's abrupt return to Nineveh. But it is remarkable that the histories of both of his chief rivals in this campaign, Judah and Egypt, should contain independent reminiscences of so sudden and miraculous a disaster to his[360] host. From Egyptian sources there has come down through Herodotus (ii. 14), a story that a king of Egypt, being deserted by the military caste, when "Sennacherib King of the Arabs and Assyrians" invaded his country, entered his sanctuary and appealed with weeping to his god; that the god appeared and cheered him, that he raised an army of artisans and marched to meet Sennacherib in Pelusium; that by night a multitude of field-mice ate up the quivers, bow-strings and shield-straps of the Assyrians; and that, as these fled on the morrow, very many of them fell. A stone statue of the king, adds Herodotus, stood in the temple of Hephæstus, having a mouse in the hand. Now, since the mouse was a symbol of sudden destruction, and even of the plague, this story of Herodotus seems to be merely a picturesque form of a tradition that pestilence broke out in the Assyrian camp. The parallel with the Bible narrative is close. In both accounts it is a prayer of the king that prevails. In both the Deity sends His agent—in the grotesque Egyptian an army of mice, in the sublime Jewish His angel. In both the effects are sudden, happening in a single night. From the Assyrian side we have this corroboration: that Sennacherib did abruptly return to Nineveh without taking Jerusalem or meeting with Tirhakah, and that, though he reigned for twenty years more, he never again made a Syrian campaign. Sennacherib's convenient story of his return may be compared to the ambiguous account which Cæsar gives of his first withdrawal from Britain, laying emphasis on the submission of the tribes as his reason for a swift return to France—a return which was rather due to the destruction of his fleet by storm and the consequent uneasiness of his army. Or, as we have already said, Sennacherib's account may be compared[361] to Napoleon's professed reason for his sudden abandonment of his Spanish campaign and his quick return to Paris in 1808.
For details about this disaster, we unfortunately rely on the Assyrian records, which only note Sennacherib's sudden return to Nineveh. However, it's interesting that both Judah and Egypt, his main adversaries in this campaign, have their own independent accounts of such a sudden and miraculous disaster to his[360] army. From Egyptian sources, we have a story passed down through Herodotus (ii. 14), which says that an Egyptian king, abandoned by his military, when "Sennacherib King of the Arabs and Assyrians" invaded, entered his sanctuary and cried to his god for help; the god appeared and encouraged him, inspiring him to raise an army of craftsmen and march to face Sennacherib in Pelusium. During the night, a swarm of field mice destroyed the quivers, bowstrings, and shield straps of the Assyrians, leading to many of them being killed as they fled the next day. Herodotus notes that a stone statue of the king stood in the temple of Hephæstus, holding a mouse. Since the mouse symbolized sudden destruction and even plague, this story from Herodotus seems to simply be a vivid retelling of a tradition that a disease broke out in the Assyrian camp. The parallel with the Biblical narrative is striking. In both accounts, it’s the king's prayer that makes a difference. In both, God sends His messenger—in the quirky Egyptian tale, an army of mice, and in the profound Jewish story, His angel. In both, the outcomes are immediate, occurring in one night. From the Assyrian perspective, we have this confirmation: Sennacherib did return to Nineveh without capturing Jerusalem or confronting Tirhakah, and although he ruled for another twenty years, he never launched another campaign in Syria. Sennacherib’s convenient narrative of his return resembles Julius Caesar’s ambiguous account of his first withdrawal from Britain, highlighting the tribes’ submission as his reason for quickly returning to France—though the real cause was the storm that wrecked his fleet and caused concern among his troops. Similarly, as we mentioned earlier, Sennacherib's version can be compared to Napoleon's stated reason for abruptly giving up his Spanish campaign and hastily returning to Paris in 1808.
The neighbourhood in which the Assyrian army suffered this great disaster[67] was notorious in antiquity for its power of pestilence. Making every allowance for the untutored imagination of the ancients, we must admit the Serbonian bog, between Syria and Egypt, to have been a place terrible for filth and miasma. The noxious vapours travelled far; but the plagues, with which this swamp several times desolated the world, were first engendered among the diseased and demoralised populations, whose villages festered upon its margin. A Persian army was decimated here in the middle of the fourth century before Christ. "The fatal disease which depopulated the earth in the time of Justinian and his successors first appeared in the neighbourhood of Pelusium, between the Serbonian bog and the eastern channel of the Nile."[68] To the north of the bog the Crusaders also suffered from the infection. It is, therefore, very probable that the moral terror of this notorious neighbourhood, as well as its malaria, acting upon an exhausted and disappointed army in a devastated land, was the secondary cause in the great disaster, by which the Almighty humbled the arrogance of Asshur. The swiftness, with which Sennacherib's retreat is said to have begun, has been[362] equalled by the turning-points of other historical campaigns. Alexander the Great's decision to withdraw from India was, after victories as many as Sennacherib's, made in three days. Attila vanished out of Italy as suddenly as Sennacherib, and from a motive less evident. In the famous War of the Fosse the Meccan army broke off from their siege of Mohammed in a single stormy night. Napoleon's career went back upon itself with just as sharp a bend no less than thrice—in 1799, on Sennacherib's own ground in Syria; in 1808, in Spain; and in 1812, when he turned from Moscow upon "one memorable night of frost, in which twenty thousand horses perished, and the strength of the French army was utterly broken."[69]
The area where the Assyrian army faced this massive disaster[67] was infamous in ancient times for being a breeding ground for disease. Considering the uninformed views of the ancients, we have to recognize that the Serbonian bog, located between Syria and Egypt, was indeed a horrific place filled with filth and pollution. The toxic fumes spread far and wide; however, the outbreaks that this swamp repeatedly unleashed on the world originated primarily among the sick and disheartened communities whose settlements plagued its edges. A Persian army was severely weakened here in the mid-fourth century BC. "The deadly illness that devastated the population during the time of Justinian and his successors first emerged near Pelusium, between the Serbonian bog and the eastern Nile channel."[68] To the north of the bog, the Crusaders also struggled with illness. It is, therefore, very likely that the psychological dread of this notorious area, along with its malaria, impacted an exhausted and disheartened army in a ravaged land, serving as a secondary factor in the great disaster that humbled the pride of Asshur by the Almighty. The speed at which Sennacherib’s retreat reportedly began has been[362] matched by the turning points of other historical military campaigns. Alexander the Great's choice to pull back from India, after achieving as many victories as Sennacherib, was reached in three days. Attila vanished from Italy just as abruptly as Sennacherib, and for reasons that were less obvious. In the infamous War of the Fosse, the Meccan army abandoned their siege of Mohammed in a single tumultuous night. Napoleon's trajectory also turned back on itself with similarly sharp shifts three times— in 1799, on Sennacherib's own territory in Syria; in 1808, in Spain; and in 1812, when he retreated from Moscow "one memorable night of frost, in which twenty thousand horses perished, and the strength of the French army was utterly broken."[69]
The amount of the Assyrian loss is enormous, and implies of course a much higher figure for the army which was vast enough to suffer it; but here are some instances for comparison. In the early German invasions of Italy whole armies and camps were swept away by the pestilential climate. The losses of the First Crusade were over three hundred thousand. The soldiers of the Third Crusade, upon the scene of Sennacherib's war, were reckoned at more than half a million, and their losses by disease alone at over one hundred thousand.[70] The Grand Army of Napoleon entered Russia two hundred and fifty thousand, but came out, having suffered no decisive defeat, only twelve thousand; on the retreat from Moscow alone ninety thousand perished.
The Assyrian loss is huge, implying a much larger number for the army that was large enough to experience it. Here are some comparisons. During the early German invasions of Italy, entire armies and camps were wiped out by the deadly climate. The losses of the First Crusade exceeded three hundred thousand. The soldiers of the Third Crusade, where Sennacherib fought, were estimated at more than half a million, with over one hundred thousand lost to disease alone.[70] Napoleon's Grand Army entered Russia with two hundred fifty thousand troops but came out with only twelve thousand, despite not facing a major defeat; ninety thousand died during the retreat from Moscow alone.
What we are concerned with, however, is neither the immediate occasion nor the exact amount of Sennacherib's loss, but the bare fact, so certainly[363] established, that, having devastated Judah to the very walls of Jerusalem, the Assyrian was compelled by some calamity apart from human war to withdraw before the sacred city itself was taken. For this was the essential part of Isaiah's prediction; upon this he had staked the credit of the pure monotheism, whose prophet he was to the world. If we keep before us these two simple certainties about the great Deliverance: first, that it had been foretold by Jehovah's word, and second, that it had been now achieved, despite all human probability, by Jehovah's own arm, we shall understand the enormous spiritual impression which it left upon Israel. The religion of the one supreme God, supreme in might because supreme in righteousness, received a most emphatic historical vindication, a signal and glorious triumph. Well might Isaiah exclaim, on the morning of the night during which that Assyrian host had drifted away from Jerusalem, Jehovah is our Judge; Jehovah is our Lawgiver; Jehovah is our King: He saveth us. No other god for the present had any chance in Judah. Idolatry was discredited, not by the political victory of a puritan faction, not even by the distinctive genius or valour of a nation, but by an evident act of Providence, to which no human aid had been contributory. It was nothing less than the baptism of Israel in spiritual religion, the grace of which was never wholly undone.
What we are focused on, however, is neither the immediate situation nor the exact amount of Sennacherib's loss, but the undeniable fact, as clearly established, that after ravaging Judah right up to the walls of Jerusalem, the Assyrian was forced to retreat due to some disaster beyond human warfare before the holy city could be captured. This was the crucial part of Isaiah's prophecy; he had staked the credibility of pure monotheism, which he represented to the world. If we keep in mind these two simple truths about the great deliverance: first, that it had been foretold by Jehovah's word, and second, that it had now been accomplished, against all human odds, by Jehovah's own power, we will grasp the profound spiritual impact it had on Israel. The religion of the one supreme God, powerful because righteous, received a strong historical affirmation, a significant and glorious victory. Isaiah could rightly proclaim, on the morning after that Assyrian army had withdrawn from Jerusalem, Jehovah is our Judge; Jehovah is our Lawgiver; Jehovah is our King: He saves us. No other god had a chance in Judah at that moment. Idolatry was discredited, not through the political victory of a puritan faction or even through the unique talent or bravery of a nation, but by a clear act of Providence, to which no human support had contributed. It was nothing less than Israel's baptism in spiritual religion, the grace of which was never entirely erased.
Nevertheless, the story of Jehovah's triumph cannot be justly recounted without including the reaction which followed upon it within the same generation. Before twenty years had passed from the day, on which Jerusalem, with the forty-sixth Psalm on her lips, sought with all her heart the God of Isaiah, she relapsed into an idolatry, that wore only this sign of the uncompromising[364] puritanism it had displaced: that it was gloomy, and filled with a sense of sin unknown to Israel's idolatries previous to the age of Isaiah. The change would be almost incomprehensible to us, who have realized the spiritual effects of Sennacherib's disappearance, if we had not within our own history a somewhat analogous experience. Puritanism was as gloriously accredited by event and seemed to be as generally accepted by England under Cromwell as faith in the spiritual religion of Isaiah was vindicated by the deliverance of Jerusalem and the peace of Judah under Hezekiah. But swiftly as the ruling temper in England changed after Cromwell's death, and Puritanism was laid under the ban, and persecution and licentiousness broke out, so quickly when Hezekiah died did Manasseh his son—no change of dynasty here—do evil in the sight of Jehovah, and make Judah to sin, building again the high places and rearing up altars for Baal and altars in the house of Jehovah, whereof Jehovah had said, In Jerusalem will I put My name. Idolatry was never so rampant in Judah. Moreover, Manasseh shed innocent blood till he filled Jerusalem from one end to another. It is in this carnage that tradition has placed the death of Isaiah. He, who had been Judah's best counsellor through five reigns, on whom the whole nation had gathered in the day of her distress, and by whose faith her long-hoped-for salvation had at last become substantive, was violently put to death by the son of Hezekiah. It is said that he was sawn asunder.[71]
Nevertheless, the story of Jehovah's triumph can't be accurately told without mentioning the reaction that followed in the same generation. Within twenty years after the day when Jerusalem, with the forty-sixth Psalm on her lips, sought wholeheartedly the God of Isaiah, she fell back into idolatry, which only bore this sign of the strict puritanism it had replaced: it was gloomy and filled with a sense of sin that was unknown to Israel's previous idolatries before the time of Isaiah. The change would be nearly incomprehensible to us, who understand the spiritual effects of Sennacherib's departure, if we didn’t have somewhat similar experiences in our own history. Puritanism was as gloriously confirmed by events and seemed to be as widely accepted in England under Cromwell as faith in Isaiah’s spiritual religion was validated by the rescue of Jerusalem and the peace of Judah under Hezekiah. But just as quickly as England's mood shifted after Cromwell's death, leading to a ban on Puritanism along with outbreaks of persecution and moral chaos, Manasseh, Hezekiah’s son – with no change of dynasty here – did evil in the sight of Jehovah and caused Judah to sin, rebuilding the high places and erecting altars for Baal and altars in the house of Jehovah, where Jehovah had said, In Jerusalem will I put My name. Idolatry had never been so widespread in Judah. Moreover, Manasseh shed innocent blood until he filled Jerusalem from one end to the other. It is in this bloodshed that tradition places the death of Isaiah. He, who had been Judah's best advisor through five reigns, on whom the entire nation turned in her time of distress, and by whose faith her long-awaited salvation had finally come to fruition, was brutally killed by the son of Hezekiah. It is said that he was sawn asunder.[71]
The parallel, which we are pursuing, does not, however, close here. "As soon," says an English historian, "as the wild orgy of the Restoration was over, men began[365] to see that nothing that was really worthy in the work of Puritanism had been undone. The whole history of English progress since the Restoration, on its moral and spiritual sides, has been the history of Puritanism."
The comparison we're making doesn't end here. "As soon," says an English historian, "as the wild party of the Restoration was over, people started[365] to realize that nothing truly valuable in the achievements of Puritanism had been erased. The entire history of England's progress since the Restoration, in terms of its moral and spiritual aspects, has actually been the story of Puritanism."
For the principles of Isaiah and their victory we may make a claim as much larger than this claim, as Israel's influence on the world has been greater than England's. Israel never wholly lost the grace of the baptism wherewith she was baptized in 701. Even in her history there was no event in which the unaided interposition of God was more conspicuous. It is from an appreciation of the meaning of such a Providence that Israel derives her character—that character which marks her off so distinctively from her great rival in the education of the human race, and endows her ministry with its peculiar value to the world. If we are asked for the characteristics of the Hellenic genius, we point to the august temples and images of beauty in which the wealth and art of man have evolved in human features most glorious suggestions of divinity, or we point to Thermopylæ, where human valour and devotion seem grander even in unavailing sacrifice than the almighty Fate, that renders them the prey of the barbarian. In Greece the human is greater than the divine. But if we are asked to define the spirit of Israel, we remember the worship which Isaiah has enjoined in his opening chapter, a worship that dispenses even with temple and with sacrifice, but, from the first strivings of conscience to the most certain enjoyment of peace, ascribes all man's experience to the word of God. In contrast with Thermopylæ, we recall Jerusalem's Deliverance, effected apart from human war by the direct stroke of Heaven. In Judah man is great simply as he rests on God. The rocks of Thermopylæ, how imperishably beautiful do[366] they shine to latest ages with the comradeship, the valour, the sacrificial blood of human heroes! It is another beauty which Isaiah saw upon the bare, dry rocks of Zion, and which has drawn to them the admiration of the world. There, he said, Jehovah is glory for us, a place of broad rivers and streams.
For the principles of Isaiah and their victory, we can make a claim as much larger than this claim as Israel's impact on the world has been greater than England's. Israel never completely lost the grace of the baptism she received in 701. Throughout her history, there was no event where God’s direct intervention was more evident. It is from understanding the significance of such a Providence that Israel shapes her identity—an identity that sets her apart distinctly from her great rival in educating humanity and gives her mission its unique value to the world. If we’re asked about the characteristics of the Hellenic spirit, we can point to the magnificent temples and beautiful art where wealth and human creativity have produced glorious reflections of divinity, or we can mention Thermopylae, where human courage and dedication appear even more grand in their ultimate sacrifice than the overpowering Fate that makes them victims of the barbarian. In Greece, the human aspect surpasses the divine. However, if we’re asked to define Israel's spirit, we remember the worship that Isaiah described in his opening chapter—a worship that does away with the need for a temple or sacrifices, instead connecting every human experience, from the earliest struggles of conscience to the deepest sense of peace, to the word of God. In contrast to Thermopylae, we recall Jerusalem's Deliverance, achieved without human conflict but by the direct intervention of Heaven. In Judah, a person is significant simply because they rely on God. The rocks of Thermopylae shine irresistibly beautiful to later generations with the camaraderie, bravery, and sacrificial blood of human heroes! It is a different beauty that Isaiah saw upon the bare, dry rocks of Zion, which has drawn the world's admiration. There, he said, Jehovah is glory for us, a place of broad rivers and streams.
In returning and rest shall ye be saved; in quietness and in confidence is your strength. How divine Isaiah's message is, may be proved by the length of time mankind is taking to learn it. The remarkable thing is, that he staked so lofty a principle, and the pure religion of which it was the temper, upon a political result, that he staked them upon, and vindicated them by, a purely local and material success—the relief of Jerusalem from the infidel. Centuries passed, and Christ came. He did not—for even He could not—preach a more spiritual religion than that which He had committed to His greatest forerunner, but He released this religion, and the temper of faith which Isaiah had so divinely expressed, from the local associations and merely national victories, with which even Isaiah had been forced to identify them. The destruction of Jerusalem by the heathen formed a large part of Christ's prediction of the immediate future; and He comforted the remnant of faith with these words, to some of which Isaiah's lips had first given their meaning: Ye shall neither in this mountain nor yet in Jerusalem worship the Father. God is a Spirit, and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth.
In returning and rest, you will be saved; in quietness and trust is your strength. The beauty of Isaiah's message is evident in how long it has taken humanity to truly understand it. It's remarkable that he associated such a profound principle—and the true essence of religion that it embodied—with a political outcome, grounding it in a specific and tangible success—the salvation of Jerusalem from foreign invaders. Centuries went by, and then Christ came. He didn't—because He couldn't—preach a more spiritual message than the one entrusted to His greatest precursor, but He liberated this faith and the spirit that Isaiah so beautifully articulated from the local contexts and national victories that even Isaiah had to tie them to. The destruction of Jerusalem by the ungodly was a significant part of Christ's predictions about the near future; He offered hope to the remaining faithful with these words, which Isaiah had first given meaning to: You will neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem worship the Father. God is a Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.
Again centuries passed—no less than eighteen from Isaiah—and we find Christendom, though Christ had come between, returning to Isaiah's superseded problem, and, while reviving its material conditions, unable to apply to them the prophet's spiritual temper. The[367] Christianity of the Crusades fell back upon Isaiah's position without his spirit. Like him, it staked the credit of religion upon the relief of the holy city from the grasp of the infidel; but, in ghastly contrast to that pure faith and serene confidence with which a single Jew maintained the inviolateness of Mount Zion in the face of Assyria, with what pride and fraud, with what blood and cruelty, with what impious invention of miracle and parody of Divine testimony, did countless armies of Christendom, excited by their most fervent prophets and blessed by their high-priest, attempt in vain the recovery of Jerusalem from the Saracen! The Crusades are a gigantic proof of how easy it is to adopt the external forms of heroic ages, how difficult to repeat their inward temper. We could not have more impressive witness borne to the fact that humanity—though obedient to the orthodox Church, though led by the strongest spirits of the age, though hallowed by the presence of its greatest saints, though enduring all trials, though exhibiting an unrivalled power of self-sacrifice and enthusiasm, though beautified by courtesy and chivalry, and though doing and suffering all for Christ's sake—may yet fail to understand the old precept that in returning and rest men are saved, in quietness and in confidence is their strength. Nothing could more emphatically prove the loftiness of Isaiah's teaching than this failure of Christendom even to come within sight of it.
Again, centuries passed—no less than eighteen since Isaiah—and we see that Christendom, despite the coming of Christ, is going back to Isaiah's outdated issue. While it revives its material conditions, it struggles to apply the prophet's spiritual mindset. The[367] Christianity of the Crusades reverted to Isaiah's stance without his spirit. Like him, it pinned the credibility of religion on freeing the holy city from the grip of the infidel; however, in stark contrast to the pure faith and calm assurance with which a single Jew upheld the sanctity of Mount Zion against Assyria, countless armies of Christendom, driven by their most passionate prophets and blessed by their high priest, attempted, in vain, to reclaim Jerusalem from the Saracen with pride and deceit, blood and cruelty, along with unholy miracles and mockeries of divine testimony! The Crusades serve as a huge testament to how easy it is to adopt the outward forms of heroic times, yet how difficult it is to replicate their inner spirit. We could not have a more powerful witness to the fact that humanity—though obedient to the orthodox Church, led by the strongest minds of the time, sanctified by the presence of its greatest saints, enduring all hardships, showcasing unparalleled self-sacrifice and enthusiasm, adorned with courtesy and chivalry, and doing and suffering all for Christ's sake—can still fail to grasp the old principle that in returning and rest men are saved, in quietness and in confidence is their strength. Nothing could illustrate the greatness of Isaiah's teachings more than this failure of Christendom to even come close to it.
Have we learned this lesson yet? O God of Israel, God of Isaiah, in returning to whom and resting upon whom alone we are saved, purge us of self and of the pride of life, of the fever and the falsehood they breed. Teach us that in quietness and in confidence is our strength. Help us to be still and know that Thou art God.
Have we learned this lesson yet? O God of Israel, God of Isaiah, in returning to You and resting upon You alone we are saved, free us from self and the pride of life, from the anxiety and the lies they create. Teach us that our strength lies in calmness and trust. Help us to be still and know that You are God.
CHAPTER XXIV.
A REVIEW OF ISAIAH'S PREDICTIONS CONCERNING THE DELIVERANCE OF JERUSALEM.
As we have gathered together all that Isaiah prophesied concerning the Messiah, so it may be useful for closer students of his book if we now summarise (even at the risk of a little repetition) the facts of his marvellous prediction of the siege and delivery of Jerusalem. Such a review, besides being historically interesting, ought to prove of edification in so far as it instructs us in the kind of faith by which the Holy Ghost inspired a prophet to foretell the future.
As we've collected everything Isaiah predicted about the Messiah, it might be helpful for those studying his book more closely to now summarize (even if it means repeating a few points) the details of his remarkable prediction about the siege and rescue of Jerusalem. This review, besides being historically interesting, should also be enlightening as it teaches us about the kind of faith that inspired a prophet to predict the future through the Holy Spirit.
1. The primary conviction with which Isaiah felt himself inspired by the Spirit of Jehovah was a purely moral one—that a devastation of Judah was necessary for her people's sin, to which he shortly added a religious one: that a remnant would be saved. He had this double conviction as early as 740 B.C. (vi. 11-13).
1. The main belief that Isaiah felt inspired by the Spirit of the Lord was a completely moral one—that the destruction of Judah was necessary due to the sins of its people. He soon added a religious belief: that a remnant would be saved. He held this double conviction as early as 740 B.C. (vi. 11-13).
2. Looking round the horizon for some phenomenon with which to identify this promised judgement, Isaiah described the latter at first without naming any single people as the invaders of Judah (v. 26 ff.). It may have been that for a moment he hesitated between Assyria and Egypt. Once he named them together as equally the Lord's instruments upon Judah (vii. 18),[369] but only once. When Ahaz resolved to call Assyria into the Syrian quarrels, Isaiah exclusively designated the northern power as the scourge he had predicted; and when in 732 the Assyrian armies had overrun Samaria, he graphically described their necessary overflow into Judah also (viii.). This invasion did not spread to Judah, but Isaiah's combined moral and political conviction, for both elements of which he claimed the inspiration of God's Spirit, seized him with renewed strength in 725, when Salmanassar marched south upon Israel (xxviii.); and in 721, when Sargon captured Samaria, Isaiah uttered a vivid description of his speedy arrival before Jerusalem (x. 28 ff.). This prediction was again disappointed. But Sargon's departure without invading Judah, and her second escape from him on his return to Syria in 711, did not in the least induce Isaiah to relax either of his two convictions. Judah he proclaimed to be as much in need of punishment as ever (xxix.-xxxii.); and, though on Sargon's death all Palestine revolted from Assyria to Egypt, he persisted that this would not save her from Sennacherib (xiv. 29 ff.; xxix.-xxx.). The "dourness" with which his countrymen believed in Egypt naturally caused the prophet to fill his orations at this time with the political side of his conviction that Assyria was stronger than Egypt; but because Jerusalem's Egyptian policy springs from a deceitful temper (xxx. 1, 9, 10) he is as earnest as ever with his moral conviction that judgement is coming. After 705 his pictures of a siege of Jerusalem grow more definite (xxix.; xxx.). He seems scorched by the nearness of the Assyrian conflagration (xxx. 27 ff.). At last in 701, when Sennacherib comes to Palestine, the siege is pictured as immediate—chaps. i. and xx., which also show at its height the prophet's moral conviction[370] of the necessity of the siege for punishing his people.
2. Looking around the horizon for some sign to identify this promised judgment, Isaiah initially described it without naming any specific people as the invaders of Judah (v. 26 ff.). He may have briefly hesitated between Assyria and Egypt. He mentioned them together as equally the Lord's instruments against Judah (vii. 18),[369] but only once. When Ahaz decided to bring in Assyria to resolve the conflicts in Syria, Isaiah specifically identified the northern power as the punishment he had predicted; and when in 732 the Assyrian armies took over Samaria, he vividly described their inevitable overflow into Judah as well (viii.). This invasion didn’t reach Judah, but Isaiah's combined moral and political conviction, both inspired by God's Spirit, took hold of him with renewed strength in 725 when Salmanassar moved south against Israel (xxviii.); and in 721, when Sargon captured Samaria, Isaiah vividly described his swift approach to Jerusalem (x. 28 ff.). This prediction fell short again. However, Sargon's decision not to invade Judah and her second escape from him on his return to Syria in 711 didn’t sway Isaiah to ease either of his two convictions. He insisted that Judah was still in desperate need of punishment (xxix.-xxxii.); and even when Sargon died and all of Palestine rebelled from Assyria to Egypt, he maintained that this would not protect her from Sennacherib (xiv. 29 ff.; xxix.-xxx.). The "dourness" with which his countrymen believed in Egypt naturally led the prophet to emphasize the political aspect of his belief that Assyria was stronger than Egypt; but since Jerusalem's Egyptian policy stemmed from a deceitful nature (xxx. 1, 9, 10), he remained earnest with his moral conviction that judgment was coming. After 705, his descriptions of a siege of Jerusalem became more specific (xxix.; xxx.). He seemed driven by the proximity of the Assyrian threat (xxx. 27 ff.). Finally, in 701, when Sennacherib arrived in Palestine, the siege was depicted as imminent—chaps. i. and xx., which also highlight the prophet's moral conviction that the siege was necessary for punishing his people.[370]
3. But over against this moral conviction, that Judah must be devastated for her sin, and this political, that Assyria is to be the instrument, even to the extreme of a siege of Jerusalem, the prophet still holds strongly to the religious assurance that God cannot allow His shrine to be violated or His people to be exterminated. At first it is only of the people that Isaiah speaks—the remnant (vi.; viii. 18). Jerusalem is not mentioned in the verses that describe the overflowing of all Judah by Assyria (viii. 7). It is only when at last, in 721, the prophet realizes how near a siege of Jerusalem may be (x. 11, 28-32), that he also pictures the sudden destruction of the Assyrian on his arrival within sight of her walls (x. 33). In 705, when the siege of the sacred city once more becomes imminent, the prophet again reiterates to the heathen that Zion alone shall stand among the cities of Syria (xiv. 32). To herself he says that, though she shall be besieged and brought very low, she shall finally be delivered (xxix. 1-8; xxx. 19-26; xxxi. 1, 4, 5). It is true, this conviction seems to be broken—once by a prophecy of uncertain date (xxxii. 14), which indicates a desolation of the buildings of Jerusalem, and once by the prophet's sentence of death upon the inhabitants in the hour of their profligacy (xxii.)—but when the city has repented, and the enemy have perfidiously come back to demand her surrender, Isaiah again asseverates, though all are hopeless, that she shall not fall (xxxvii.).
3. But against this moral conviction that Judah must face destruction for its sins, and this political reality that Assyria will be the tool for that, even leading to a siege of Jerusalem, the prophet still firmly believes in the religious assurance that God won't let His temple be desecrated or His people wiped out. At first, Isaiah speaks only of the people—the remnant (vi.; viii. 18). Jerusalem isn’t mentioned in the verses describing Assyria’s takeover of all Judah (viii. 7). It’s only in 721 when the prophet realizes how close a siege of Jerusalem might be (x. 11, 28-32) that he also envisions the sudden destruction of the Assyrian army as they approach her walls (x. 33). In 705, when the siege of the holy city becomes imminent again, the prophet reassures the nations that Zion will stand strong among the cities of Syria (xiv. 32). To Jerusalem, he says that even though she will be besieged and brought extremely low, she will ultimately be saved (xxix. 1-8; xxx. 19-26; xxxi. 1, 4, 5). It’s true that this belief seems to be shaken—first by a prophecy of uncertain date (xxxii. 14) indicating destruction of Jerusalem’s buildings, and second by the prophet’s judgment of death on the people during their corruption (xxii.)—but when the city repents and the enemies deceitfully return to demand her surrender, Isaiah again insists, even if everyone else is hopeless, that she will not fall (xxxvii.).
4. Now, with regard to the method of Jerusalem's deliverance, Isaiah has uniformly described this as happening not by human battle. From the beginning he said that Israel should be delivered in the last extremity[371] of their weakness (vi. 13). On the Assyrian's arrival over against the city, Jehovah is to lop him off (x. 33). When her enemies have invested Jerusalem, Jehovah is to come down in thunder and a hurricane and sweep them away (after 705, xxix. 5-8). They are to be suddenly disappointed, like a hungry man waking from a dream of food. A beautiful promise is given of the raising of the siege without mention of struggle or any weapon (xxx. 20-26). The Assyrian is to be checked as a wild bull is checked with a lasso, is to be slain by the lighting down of the Lord's arm, by the voice of the Lord, through a judgement that shall be like a solemn holocaust to God than a human battle (xxx. 30-33). When the Assyrian comes back, and Hezekiah is crushed by the new demand for surrender, Isaiah says that, by a Divinely inspired impulse, Sennacherib, hearing bad news, shall suddenly return to his own land (xxxviii. 7).
4. Now, regarding how Jerusalem will be saved, Isaiah has consistently described it as not happening through human effort. From the start, he stated that Israel would be rescued in their most desperate time[371] of weakness (vi. 13). When the Assyrian arrives outside the city, God will cut him down (x. 33). When Jerusalem is surrounded by enemies, God will come down in thunder and a storm and sweep them away (after 705, xxix. 5-8). They will be caught off guard, like a hungry person waking from a dream about food. There’s a beautiful promise of lifting the siege without any mention of a struggle or weapons (xxx. 20-26). The Assyrian will be stopped like a wild bull is stopped with a lasso, and will be defeated by the powerful action of the Lord's arm, by the voice of the Lord, through a judgment that will be more like a solemn offering to God than a human battle (xxx. 30-33). When the Assyrian returns and Hezekiah is overcome by the new demand for surrender, Isaiah says that, inspired by God, Sennacherib will suddenly go back to his own land after hearing bad news (xxxviii. 7).
It is only in very little details that these predictions differ. The thunderstorm and torrents of fire are, of course, but poetic variations. In 721, however, the prophet hardly anticipates the very close siege, which he pictures after 705; and while from 705 to 702 he identifies the relief of Jerusalem with a great calamity to the Assyrian army about to invade Judah, yet in 701, when the Assyrians are actually on the spot, he suggests that nothing but a rumour shall cause their retreat and so leave Jerusalem free of them.
It’s only in minor details that these predictions differ. The thunderstorm and torrents of fire are really just poetic variations. In 721, though, the prophet doesn't quite foresee the intense siege that he describes after 705; and while from 705 to 702 he connects the relief of Jerusalem with a major disaster for the Assyrian army that’s set to invade Judah, in 701, when the Assyrians are actually present, he implies that only a rumor will prompt their retreat, leaving Jerusalem free from them.
5. In all this we see a certain FIXITY and a certain FREEDOM. The freedom, the changes and inconsistencies in the prediction, are entirely limited to those of Isaiah's convictions which we have called political, and which the prophet evidently gathered from his observation of political circumstances as these developed[372] before his eyes from year to year. But what was fixed and unalterable to Isaiah, he drew from the moral and religious convictions to which his political observation was subservient; viz., Judah's very sore punishment for sin, the survival of a people of God in the world, and their deliverance by His own act.
5. In all this, we see a certain Fixity and a certain LIBERTY. The freedom, the changes and inconsistencies in the prediction, are entirely tied to Isaiah's political beliefs, which he clearly formed based on his observations of the political situation as it unfolded before him year after year. However, what was fixed and unchangeable for Isaiah came from the moral and religious convictions that supported his political observations; specifically, Judah's severe punishment for sin, the survival of a people of God in the world, and their deliverance by His own action.
6. This "Bible-reading" in Isaiah's predictive prophecies reveals very clearly the nature of inspiration under the old covenant. To Isaiah inspiration was nothing more nor less than the possession of certain strong moral and religious convictions, which he felt he owed to the communication of the Spirit of God, and according to which he interpreted, and even dared to foretell, the history of his people and the world. Our study completely dispels, on the evidence of the Bible itself, that view of inspiration and prediction, so long held in the Church, which it is difficult to define, but which means something like this: that the prophet beheld a vision of the future in its actual detail and read this off as a man may read the history of the past out of a book or a clear memory. This is a very simple view, but too simple either to meet the facts of the Bible, or to afford to men any of that intellectual and spiritual satisfaction which the discovery of the Divine methods is sure to afford. The literal view of inspiration is too simple to be true, and too simple to be edifying. On the other hand, how profitable, how edifying, is the Bible's own account of its inspiration! To know that men interpreted, predicted and controlled history in the power of the purest moral and religious convictions—in the knowledge of, and the loyalty to, certain fundamental laws of God—is to receive an account of inspiration, which is not only as satisfying to the reason as it is true to the facts[373] of the Bible, but is spiritually very helpful by the lofty example and reward it sets before our own faith. By faith differing in degree, but not in kind, from ours, faith which is the substance of things hoped for, these men became prophets of God, and received the testimony of history that they spoke from Him. Isaiah prophesied and predicted all he did from loyalty to two simple truths, which he tells us he received from God Himself: that sin must be punished, and that the people of God must be saved. This simple faith, acting along with a wonderful knowledge of human nature and ceaseless vigilance of affairs, constituted inspiration for Isaiah.
6. This "Bible-reading" in Isaiah's predictive prophecies clearly shows the nature of inspiration under the old covenant. For Isaiah, inspiration was simply having strong moral and religious beliefs that he believed came from the Spirit of God. Based on these convictions, he interpreted and even dared to predict the history of his people and the world. Our study completely dispels, based on the evidence from the Bible itself, the long-held view in the Church of inspiration and prediction, which is hard to define, but suggests that the prophet saw a detailed vision of the future and recounted it like someone reading history from a book or clear memory. This view is very simplistic and fails to account for the facts of the Bible, nor does it provide the intellectual and spiritual satisfaction that understanding the Divine methods can. The literal view of inspiration is too simple to be true and too simple to be enlightening. In contrast, the Bible’s own description of its inspiration is incredibly valuable and uplifting! To know that individuals interpreted, predicted, and guided history based on pure moral and religious beliefs—rooted in loyalty to fundamental laws of God—offers an understanding of inspiration that is both reasonable and true to the facts of the Bible, while also being spiritually enriching through the high example and reward it holds out for our own faith. With faith that differs in degree, but not in kind from ours, faith which is the substance of things hoped for, these people became prophets of God and received the acknowledgment of history that they spoke on His behalf. Isaiah prophesied and predicted everything he did out of loyalty to two simple truths that he says he received from God Himself: that sin must be punished, and that the people of God must be saved. This straightforward faith, coupled with a deep understanding of human nature and constant awareness of circumstances, defined inspiration for Isaiah.
There is thus, with great modifications, an analogy between the prophet and the scientific observer of the present day. Men of science are able to affirm the certainty of natural phenomena by their knowledge of the laws and principles of nature. Certain forces being present, certain results must come to pass. The Old Testament prophets, working in history, a sphere where the problems were infinitely more complicated by the presence and powerful operation of man's free-will, seized hold of principles as conspicuous and certain to them as the laws of nature are to the scientist; and out of their conviction of these they proclaimed the necessity of certain events. God is inflexibly righteous, He cannot utterly destroy His people or the witness of Himself among men: these were the laws. Judah shall be punished, Israel shall continue to exist: these were the certainties deduced from the laws. But for the exact conditions and forms both of the punishment and its relief the prophets depended upon their knowledge of the world, of which, as these pages testify, they were the keenest and largest-hearted observers that ever appeared.
There is, with significant changes, a similarity between the prophet and the scientific observer of today. Scientists are able to confirm the certainty of natural phenomena through their understanding of the laws and principles of nature. With certain forces present, specific results are bound to occur. The Old Testament prophets, working within history—a field where issues were much more complex due to the presence and significant influence of human free will—grasped principles that were as clear and certain to them as the laws of nature are to scientists; and from their conviction about these principles, they proclaimed the necessity of certain events. God is unchangingly just; He cannot completely destroy His people or erase the testimony of Himself among humanity: these were the laws. Judah will be punished; Israel will continue to exist: these were the certainties drawn from the laws. However, for the specific circumstances and forms of both punishment and relief, the prophets relied on their understanding of the world, of which, as these pages show, they were the most insightful and broad-minded observers that ever existed.
This account of prophecy may be offered with advantage[374] to those who are prejudiced against prophecy as full of materials, which are inexplicable to minds accustomed to find a law and reason for everything. Grant the truths of the spiritual doctrines, which the prophets made their premises, and you must admit that their predictions are neither arbitrary nor bewildering. Or begin at the other end: verify that these facts took place, and that the prophets actually predicted them; and if you are true to your own scientific methods, you will not be able to resist the conclusion that the spiritual laws and principles, by which the predictions were made, are as real as those by which in the realm of nature you proclaim the necessity of certain physical phenomena—and all this in spite of there being at work in the prophets' sphere a force, the free-will of man, which cannot interfere with the laws you work by, as it can with those on which they depend.
This account of prophecy might be helpful[374] for those who are biased against it, as it provides material that is challenging for minds used to finding a rationale for everything. If you accept the truths of the spiritual doctrines that the prophets based their work on, you have to acknowledge that their predictions are neither random nor confusing. Alternatively, start from the other side: confirm that these events actually occurred and that the prophets indeed predicted them; and if you stick to your own scientific methods, you won’t be able to ignore the conclusion that the spiritual laws and principles that guided the predictions are just as real as the laws governing the physical phenomena in nature—and all this despite the fact that in the realm of the prophets, there is a force at play, the free will of man, which can disrupt the laws you rely on, but not those that the predictions are based upon.
But, to turn from the apologetic value of this account of prophecy to the experimental, we maintain that it brings out a new sacredness upon common life. If it be true that Isaiah had no magical means for foretelling the future, but simply his own spiritual convictions and his observation of history, that may, of course, deprive some eyes of a light which they fancied they saw bursting from heaven. But, on the other hand, does it not cast a greater glory upon daily life and history, to have seen in Isaiah this close connection between spiritual conviction and political event? Does it not teach us that life is governed by faith; that the truths we profess are the things that make history; that we carry the future in our hearts; that not an event happens but is to be used by us as meaning the effect of some law of God, and not a fact appears but is the symbol and sacrament of His truth?
But, shifting from the apologetic value of this account of prophecy to the experiential, we argue that it highlights a new sacredness in everyday life. If it’s true that Isaiah had no magical way of predicting the future, but relied solely on his spiritual beliefs and observations of history, that might certainly take away the illusion of some people who thought they saw divine light. However, doesn’t it actually enhance the significance of our daily lives and history to recognize this deep connection Isaiah made between spiritual beliefs and political events? Doesn’t it teach us that life is driven by faith; that the truths we embrace shape history; that we carry the future within us; that no event occurs without being meaningful as a reflection of God’s law, and no fact appears without being a symbol and sacrament of His truth?
CHAPTER XXV.
AN OLD TESTAMENT BELIEVER'S SICK-BED; OR, THE DIFFERENCE CHRIST HAS MADE.
Isaiah xxxviii.; xxxix. (DATE UNCERTAIN).
Isaiah 38; 39. (DATE UNCERTAIN).
To the great national drama of Jerusalem's deliverance, there have been added two scenes of a personal kind, relating to her king. Chaps. xxxviii. and xxxix. are the narrative of the sore sickness and recovery of King Hezekiah, and of the embassy which Merodach-baladan sent him, and how he received the embassy. The date of these events is difficult to determine. If, with Canon Cheyne, we believe in an invasion of Judah by Sargon in 711, we shall be tempted to refer them, as he does, to that date—the more so that the promise of fifteen additional years made to Hezekiah in 711, the fifteenth year of his reign, would bring it up to the twenty-nine, at which it is set in 2 Kings xviii. 2. That, however, would flatly contradict the statement both of Isaiah xxxviii. 1 and 2 Kings xx. 1 that Hezekiah's sickness fell in the days of the invasion of Judah by Sennacherib; that is, after 705. But to place the promise of fifteen additional years to Hezekiah after 705, when we know he had been reigning for at least twenty years, would be to contradict the verse, just cited, which sums up the years of his reign as twenty-nine. This is, in fact,[376] one of the instances, in which we must admit our present inability to elucidate the chronology of this portion of the book of Isaiah. Mr. Cheyne thinks the editor mistook the siege by Sennacherib for the siege by Sargon. But as the fact of a siege by Sargon has never been satisfactorily established, it seems safer to trust the statement that Hezekiah's sickness occurred in the reign of Sennacherib, and to allow that there has been an error somewhere in the numbering of the years. It is remarkable that the name of Merodach-baladan does not help us to decide between the two dates. There was a Merodach-baladan in rebellion against Sargon in 710, and there was one in rebellion against Sennacherib in 705. It has not yet been put past doubt as to whether these two are the same. The essential is that there was a Merodach-baladan alive, real or only claimant king of Babylon, about 705, and that he was likely at that date to treat with Hezekiah, being himself in revolt against Assyria. Unable to come to any decision about the conflicting numbers, we leave uncertain the date of the events recounted in chaps. xxxviii., xxxix. The original form of the narrative, but wanting Hezekiah's hymn, is given in 2 Kings xx.[72]
To the major national story of Jerusalem's rescue, two personal scenes about her king have been added. Chapters 38 and 39 tell the story of King Hezekiah's severe illness and recovery, along with the embassy that Merodach-baladan sent to him, and how he received the visitors. Figuring out when these events took place is tricky. If we agree with Canon Cheyne that Sargon invaded Judah in 711, we might link these events to that year, especially since the promise of fifteen more years made to Hezekiah in 711, the fifteenth year of his reign, would bring it to the twenty-ninth year, as mentioned in 2 Kings 18:2. However, this contradicts the claims in Isaiah 38:1 and 2 Kings 20:1 that Hezekiah's illness happened during Sennacherib's invasion of Judah, which was after 705. Placing the promise of fifteen additional years to Hezekiah after 705, when he had already been reigning for at least twenty years, contradicts the previously mentioned verse that states he reigned for twenty-nine years. This is actually one of those cases where we have to admit we can't clarify the timeline in this part of the book of Isaiah. Mr. Cheyne believes the editor confused the siege by Sennacherib with the siege by Sargon. However, since the siege by Sargon hasn't been reliably established, it seems more prudent to trust that Hezekiah's illness occurred during Sennacherib's reign and to accept that there has been some error in counting the years. It's interesting that Merodach-baladan's name doesn't help us decide between the two dates. There was a Merodach-baladan rebelling against Sargon in 710, and one rebelling against Sennacherib in 705. It's still uncertain whether they are the same person. The key point is that there was a Merodach-baladan, whether a real king or someone claiming that title, around 705, and it’s likely he would have reached out to Hezekiah, being in revolt against Assyria himself. Since we can't resolve the conflicting timelines, we remain unsure about when the events in chapters 38 and 39 took place. The original version of the story, minus Hezekiah's hymn, is presented in 2 Kings 20.
We have given to this chapter the title "An Old Testament Believer's Deathbed; or, The Difference Christ has made," not because this is the only spiritual suggestion of the story, but because it seems to the present expositor as if this were the predominant feeling[377] left in Christian minds after reading for us the story. In Hezekiah's conduct there is much of courage for us to admire, as there are other elements to warn us; but when we have read the whole story, we find ourselves saying, What a difference Christ has made to me! Take Hezekiah from two points of view, and then let the narrative itself bring out this difference.
We titled this chapter "An Old Testament Believer's Deathbed; or, The Difference Christ has Made" because it seems to us that this reflects the main takeaway from the story, even though there are other spiritual insights to consider[377]. Hezekiah's actions show us a lot of bravery to admire, along with other aspects that serve as warnings; however, after reading the entire story, we can't help but think, What a difference Christ has made for me! Let's look at Hezekiah from two perspectives, and then let the story itself highlight this difference.
Here is a man, who, although he lived more than twenty-five centuries ago is brought quite close to our side. Death, who herds all men into his narrow fold, has crushed this Hebrew king so close to us that we can feel his very heart beat. Hezekiah's hymn gives us entrance into the fellowship of his sufferings. By the figures he so skilfully uses he makes us feel that pain, the shortness of life, the suddenness of death and the utter blackness beyond were to him just what they are to us. And yet this kinship in pain, and fear and ignorance only makes us the more aware of something else which we have and he has not.
Here is a man who, even though he lived over twenty-five centuries ago, feels surprisingly close to us. Death, who gathers all people into his small realm, has brought this Hebrew king so near that we can almost feel his heart beating. Hezekiah's hymn allows us to share in his struggles. Through the vivid imagery he skillfully employs, he makes us feel that pain, the brevity of life, the suddenness of death, and the complete darkness that follows were as real to him as they are to us. Yet, this shared experience of pain, fear, and uncertainty highlights an awareness of something else we have that he does not.
Again, here is a man to whom religion gave all it could give without the help of Christ; a believer in the religion out of which Christianity sprang, perhaps the most representative Old Testament believer we could find, for Hezekiah was at once the collector of what was best in its literature and the reformer of what was worst in its worship; a man permeated by the past piety of his Church, and enjoying as his guide and philosopher the boldest prophet who ever preached the future developments of its spirit. Yet when we put Hezekiah and all that Isaiah can give him on one side, we shall again feel for ourselves on the other what a difference Christ has made.
Again, here is a man to whom religion provided everything it could without the influence of Christ; a believer in the faith from which Christianity emerged, possibly the most representative Old Testament believer we could find. Hezekiah was both a collector of the best in its literature and a reformer of the worst in its worship; a man deeply influenced by the past piety of his Church, guided by the boldest prophet who ever preached the future developments of its spirit. Yet when we compare Hezekiah and all that Isaiah can offer him with what we have today, we will clearly see the difference that Christ has made.
This difference a simple study of the narrative will make clear.
This difference will be clear from a simple study of the narrative.
[378]I.
I.
In those days Hezekiah became sick unto death. They were critical days for Judah—no son born to the king (2 Kings xxi. 1), the work of reformation in Judah not yet consolidated, the big world tossing in revolution all around. Under God, everything depended on an experienced ruler; and this one, without a son to succeed him, was drawing near to death. We will therefore judge Hezekiah's strong passion for life to have been patriotic as well as selfish. He stood in the midtime of his days, with a faithfully executed work behind him and so good an example of kinghood that for years Isaiah had not expressed his old longing for the Messiah. The Lord had counted Hezekiah righteous; that twin-sign had been given him which more than any other assured an Israelite of Jehovah's favour—a good conscience and success in his work. Well, therefore, might he cry when Isaiah brought him the sentence of death, Ah, now, Jehovah, remember, I beseech Thee, how I have walked before Thee in truth and with a perfect heart, and have done that which is good in Thine eyes. And Hezekiah wept with a great weeping.
In those days, Hezekiah became seriously ill. They were critical times for Judah—no son had been born to the king (2 Kings xxi. 1), the reformation work in Judah wasn't yet solidified, and the world was in turmoil. Everything depended on a capable leader, and this one, without an heir, was approaching death. Thus, we can see that Hezekiah's strong desire to live was both patriotic and selfish. He was in the prime of his life, with a well-executed legacy and a strong example of kingship that had made Isaiah stop expressing his old hope for the Messiah for years. The Lord considered Hezekiah righteous; he had been given that sign which assured any Israelite of Jehovah's favor—a clear conscience and success in his endeavors. It's no wonder he cried out when Isaiah brought him the message of death, Ah, now, Jehovah, remember, I plead with You, how I have walked before You in truth and with a perfect heart, and have done what is good in Your sight. And Hezekiah wept bitterly.
There is difficulty in the strange story which follows. The dial was probably a pyramid of steps on the top of which stood a short pillar or obelisk. When the sun rose in the morning, the shadow cast by the pillar would fall right down the western side of the pyramid to the bottom of the lowest step. As the sun ascended the shadow would shorten, and creep up inch by inch to the foot of the pillar. After noon, as the sun began to descend to the west, the shadow would creep down the eastern steps; and the steps were so measured that[379] each one marked a certain degree of time. It was probably afternoon when Isaiah visited the king. The shadow was going down according to the regular law; the sign consisted in causing the shadow to shrink up the steps again. Such a reversal of the ordinary progress of the shadow may have been caused in either of two ways: by the whole earth being thrown back on its axis, which we may dismiss as impossible, or by the occurrence of the phenomenon known as refraction. Refraction is a disturbance in the atmosphere by which the rays of the sun are bent or deflected from their natural course into an angular one. In this case, instead of shooting straight over the top of the obelisk, the rays of the sun had been bent down and inward, so that the shadow fled up to the foot of the obelisk. There are many things in the air which might cause this; it is a phenomenon often observed; and the Scriptural narratives imply that on this occasion it was purely local (2 Chron. xxxii. 31). Had we only the narrative in the book of Isaiah, the explanation would have been easy. Isaiah, having given the sentence of death, passed the dial in the palace courtyard, and saw the shadow lying ten degrees farther up than it should have done, the sight of which coincided with the inspiration that the king would not die; and Isaiah went back to announce to Hezekiah his reprieve, and naturally call his attention to this as a sign, to which a weak and desponding man would be glad to cling. But the original narrative in the book of Kings tells us that Isaiah offered Hezekiah a choice of signs: that the shadow should either advance or retreat, and that the king chose the latter. The sign came in answer to Isaiah's prayer, and is narrated to us as a special Divine interposition. But a medicine accompanied it, and[380] Hezekiah recovered through a poultice of figs laid on the boil from which he suffered.
There is a challenge in the strange story that follows. The dial was likely a pyramid of steps topped by a short pillar or obelisk. When the sun rose in the morning, the shadow cast by the pillar fell straight down the western side of the pyramid to the bottom of the lowest step. As the sun climbed higher, the shadow would shorten and creep up inch by inch to the foot of the pillar. After noon, as the sun started to descend in the west, the shadow would move down the eastern steps; and the steps were measured so that[379] each one represented a specific amount of time. It was probably afternoon when Isaiah visited the king. The shadow was going down like it usually did; the sign was that the shadow would shrink up the steps again. This reversal of the usual movement of the shadow could have happened in one of two ways: either by the entire earth being pushed back on its axis, which we can rule out as impossible, or through a phenomenon known as refraction. Refraction is an atmospheric disturbance that bends or deflects sunlight from its natural path into an angle. In this case, instead of going straight over the top of the obelisk, the sun's rays were bent down and inward, causing the shadow to race up to the base of the obelisk. Many factors in the atmosphere could cause this; it's a phenomenon that's often seen; and the biblical accounts suggest that it was purely local this time (2 Chron. xxxii. 31). If we only had the account in the book of Isaiah, the explanation would be simple. Isaiah, after delivering the death sentence, passed the dial in the palace courtyard and saw the shadow ten degrees higher than it should have been, which coincided with the revelation that the king would not die; and Isaiah returned to inform Hezekiah of his reprieve and naturally pointed this out as a sign, which a weak and troubled man would be eager to embrace. However, the original narrative in the book of Kings tells us that Isaiah offered Hezekiah a choice of signs: whether the shadow should advance or retreat, and the king chose the latter. The sign came in response to Isaiah's prayer and is described as a special Divine intervention. But there was also a medicine involved, and[380] Hezekiah recovered thanks to a poultice of figs placed on the boil he had.
While recognising for our own faith the uselessness of a discussion on this sign offered to a sick man, let us not miss the moral lessons of so touching a narrative, nor the sympathy with the sick king which it is fitted to produce, and which is our best introduction to the study of his hymn.
While acknowledging that discussing this sign given to a sick man is pointless for our own faith, let's not overlook the moral lessons of such a moving story, nor the compassion for the ailing king that it evokes, which serves as our best entry point into understanding his hymn.
Isaiah had performed that most awful duty of doctor or minister the telling of a friend that he must die. Few men have not in their personal experience a key to the prophet's feelings on this occasion. The leaving of a dear friend for the last time; the coming out into the sunlight which he will nevermore share with us; the passing by the dial; the observation of the creeping shadow; the feeling that it is only a question of time, the passion of prayer into which that feeling throws us that God may be pleased to put off the hour and spare our friend; the invention, that is born, like prayer, of necessity: a cure we suddenly remember; the confidence which prayer and invention bring between them; the return with the joyful news; the giving of the order about the remedy—cannot many in their degree rejoice with Isaiah in such an experience? But he has, too, a conscience of God and God's work to which none of us may pretend: he knows how indispensable to that work his royal pupil is, and out of this inspiration he prophesies the will of the Lord that Hezekiah shall recover.
Isaiah had to perform the most dreadful duty of a doctor or minister: telling a friend that he must die. Most people can relate to the prophet's feelings in this moment. Saying goodbye to a dear friend for the last time; stepping out into the sunlight that they will never share again; watching the shadow creep across the dial; sensing that it's only a matter of time; the intense drive to pray that God might delay the hour and spare our friend; the sudden flash of a remedy we remember out of necessity; the confidence that prayer and new ideas bring together; the hope of returning with good news; the giving of instructions about the cure—can’t many of us share Isaiah's feelings in this experience? But he also carries a deep awareness of God and God's work that none of us can match: he understands how essential his royal pupil is to that work, and from this knowledge, he prophesies God’s will that Hezekiah will recover.
Then the king, with a sick man's sacramental longing, asks a sign. Out through the window the courtyard is visible; there stands the same step-dial of Ahaz, the long pillar on the top of the steps, the shadow creeping down them through the warm afternoon sunshine. To the sick man it must have been like the finger[381] of death coming nearer. Shall the shadow, asks the prophet, go forward ten steps or go back ten steps? It is easy, says the king, alarmed, for the shadow to go down ten steps. Easy for it to go down! Has he not been feeling that all the afternoon? "Do not," we can fancy him saying, with the gasp of a man who has been watching its irresistible descent—"do not let that black thing come farther; but let the shadow go backward ten steps."
Then the king, filled with a sick person's desperate hope, asks for a sign. Through the window, he can see the courtyard; there stands the same step-dial of Ahaz, the tall pillar at the top of the steps, the shadow creeping down them in the warm afternoon sun. To the sick man, it must have felt like the finger of death drawing closer. Should the shadow, the prophet asks, move forward ten steps or go back ten steps? It’s easy, says the king, alarmed, for the shadow to go down ten steps. Easy for it to go down! Hasn’t he felt that all afternoon? "Please don’t," we can imagine him saying, gasping like someone who’s been watching its unstoppable descent—"don’t let that dark thing come any closer; instead, let the shadow go backward ten steps."
The shadow returned, and Hezekiah got his sign. But when he was well, he used it for more than a sign. He read a great spiritual lesson in it. The time, which upon the dial had been apparently thrown back, had in his life been really thrown back; and God had given him his years to live over again. The past was to be as if it had never been, its guilt and weakness wiped out. Thou hast cast behind Thy back all my sins. As a newborn child Hezekiah felt himself uncommitted by the past, not a sin's-doubt nor a sin's-cowardice in him, with the heart of a little child, but yet with the strength and dignity of a grown man, for it is the magic of tribulation to bring innocence with experience. I shall go softly, or literally, with dignity or caution, as in a procession, all my years because of the bitterness of my soul. O Lord, upon such things do men live; and altogether in them is the life of my spirit.... Behold, for perfection was it bitter to me, so bitter. And through it all there breaks a new impression of God. What shall I say? He hath both spoken with me, and Himself hath done it. As if afraid to impute his profits to the mere experience itself, In them is the life of my spirit, he breaks in with Yea, Thou hast recovered me; yea, Thou hast made me to live. And then, by a very pregnant construction, he adds, [382]Thou hast loved my soul out of the pit of destruction; that is, of course, loved, and by Thy love lifted, but he uses the one word loved, and gives it the active force of drawing or lifting. In this lay the head and glory of Hezekiah's experience. He was a religious man, an enthusiast for the Temple services, and had all his days as his friend the prophet whose heart was with the heart of God; but it was not through any of these means God came near him, not till he lay sick and had turned his face to the wall. Then indeed he cried, What shall I say? He hath both spoken with me, and Himself hath done it!
The shadow returned, and Hezekiah got his sign. But when he was well, he used it for more than just a sign. He saw a deep spiritual lesson in it. The time that had appeared to roll back on the dial had, in his life, truly been rolled back; and God had given him a chance to live his years over again. The past was to be as if it had never happened, its guilt and weakness erased. You have cast all my sins behind Your back. Like a newborn child, Hezekiah felt free from his past, without a doubt or cowardice from sin within him, with the heart of a child but still possessing the strength and dignity of an adult, because the power of struggle brings innocence along with experience. I shall go softly, or literally, with dignity or caution, like in a procession, all my years because of the bitterness of my soul. O Lord, on such things do people live; and in them is the life of my spirit.... Look, for perfection was bitter to me, so bitter. And through it all, a new revelation of God emerges. What shall I say? He has both spoken with me, and He Himself has done it. As if hesitant to attribute his recovery to mere experience, In them is the life of my spirit, he interjects with Yes, You have restored me; yes, You have given me life. Then, with a very poignant statement, he adds, [382]You have loved my soul out of the pit of destruction; that is, of course, loved, and by Your love lifted me, but he uses the word loved and gives it an active sense of drawing or lifting. This was the essence and glory of Hezekiah's experience. He was a religious man, passionate about the Temple services, and throughout his life had a companion in the prophet whose heart aligned with God’s; but it was not through any of these means that God came close to him, not until he lay sick and turned his face to the wall. Then indeed he cried, What shall I say? He has both spoken with me, and He Himself has done it!
Forgiveness, a new peace, a new dignity and a visit from the living God! Well might Hezekiah exclaim that it was only through a near sense of death that men rightly learned to live. Ah, Lord, it is upon these things that men live; and wholly therein is the life of my spirit. It is by these things men live, and therein I have learned for the first time what life is!
Forgiveness, a fresh sense of peace, a new dignity, and an encounter with the living God! Hezekiah could rightly say that it’s often through facing death that people truly understand how to live. Ah, Lord, it is on these things that people live; and in them is the essence of my spirit. It is through these things that people live, and that’s where I’ve finally discovered what life really is!
In all this at least we cannot go beyond Hezekiah, and he stands an example to the best Christian among us. Never did a man bring richer harvest from the fields of death. Everything that renders life really life—peace, dignity, a new sense of God and of His forgiveness—these were the spoils which Hezekiah won in his struggle with the grim enemy. He had snatched from death a new meaning for life; he had robbed death of its awful pomp, and bestowed this on careless life. Hereafter he should walk with the step and the mien of a conqueror—I shall go in solemn procession all my years because of the bitterness of my soul—or with the carefulness of a worshipper, who sees at the end of his course the throne of the Most High God, and makes all his life an ascent thither.
In all this, at least we can look up to Hezekiah, who serves as an example to the best of us. Never has a person brought back such a rich harvest from the fields of death. Everything that makes life truly meaningful—peace, dignity, a fresh understanding of God and His forgiveness—these were the rewards that Hezekiah gained in his battle with the grim enemy. He had taken from death a new significance for life; he had stripped death of its terrifying grandeur and given that to everyday life. From now on, he would walk with the confidence and presence of a victor—I shall go in solemn procession all my years because of the bitterness of my soul—or with the intentionality of a worshipper, who sees the throne of the Most High God at the end of his journey and makes his entire life a journey upward toward it.
[383]This is the effect which every great sorrow and struggle has upon a noble soul. Come to the streets of the living. Who are these, whom we can so easily distinguish from the crowd by their firmness of step and look of peace, walking softly where some spurt and some halt, holding, without rest or haste, the tenor of their way, as if they marched to music heard by their ears alone? These are they which have come out of great tribulation. They have brought back into time the sense of eternity. They know how near the invisible worlds lie to this one, and the sense of the vast silences stills all idle laughter in their hearts. The life that is to other men chance or sport, strife or hurried flight, has for them its allotted distance; is for them a measured march, a constant worship. For the bitterness of their soul they go in procession all their years. Sorrow's subjects, they are our kings; wrestlers with death, our veterans: and to the rabble armies of society they set the step of a nobler life.
[383]This is the impact that every significant sorrow and struggle has on a noble soul. Step into the world of the living. Who are these people, easily distinguished from the crowd by their steady stride and peaceful expressions, walking calmly while others rush and pause, maintaining their pace as if they were marching to music only they can hear? These are the ones who have emerged from great suffering. They have brought back a sense of eternity into their lives. They understand how close the unseen worlds are to this one, and the awareness of the vast silences quiets all empty laughter in their hearts. What is to others mere chance or play, conflict or frantic escape, is for them a purposeful journey; it is a continuous act of worship. For the pain they carry, they walk in a procession throughout their lives. Subjects of sorrow, they are our leaders; fighters against death, our seasoned warriors: and they show the masses of society the way to a nobler existence.
Count especially the young man blessed, who has looked into the grave before he has faced the great temptations of the world, and has not entered the race of life till he has learned his stride in the race with death. They tell us that on the outside of civilisation, where men carry their lives in their hands, a most thorough politeness and dignity are bred, in spite of the want of settled habits, by the sense of danger alone; and we know how battle and a deadly climate, pestilence or the perils of the sea have sent back to us the most careless of our youth with a self-possession and regularity of mind, that it would have been hopeless to expect them to develop amid the trivial trials of village life.
Count especially the young man who is fortunate, having stared into the grave before confronting the major temptations of the world, and has not stepped into the race of life until he has figured out his pace in the contest against death. They say that on the fringes of civilization, where people put their lives at risk, a profound politeness and dignity emerge, despite the lack of stable routines, simply because of the awareness of danger; and we know how war and a harsh environment, disease, or the dangers of the sea have returned even the most carefree of our youth to us with a composure and mental discipline that we could never have hoped for them to develop in the petty trials of village life.
But the greatest duty of us men is not to seek nor to pray for such combats with death. It is when God has[384] found these for us to remain true to our memories of them. The hardest duty of life is to remain true to our psalms of deliverance, as it is certainly life's greatest temptation to fall away from the sanctity of sorrow, and suffer the stately style of one who knows how near death hovers to his line of march to degenerate into the broken step of a wanton life. This was Hezekiah's temptation, and this is why the story of his fall in the thirty-ninth chapter is placed beside his vows in the thirty-eighth—to warn us how easy it is for those who have come conquerors out of a struggle with death to fall a prey to common life. He had said, I will walk softly all my years; but how arrogantly and rashly he carried himself when Merodach-baladan sent the embassy to congratulate him on his recovery. It was not with the dignity of the veteran, but with a childish love of display, perhaps also with the too restless desire to secure an alliance, that he showed the envoys his storehouse, the silver, and the gold, and the spices, and the precious oil, and all the house of his armour and all that was found in his treasures. There was nothing which Hezekiah did not show them in his house nor in all his dominion. In this behaviour there was neither caution nor sobriety, and we cannot doubt but that Hezekiah felt the shame of it when Isaiah sternly rebuked him and threw upon all his house the dark shadow of captivity.
But the most important responsibility for us men is not to seek or pray for battles with death. It is during those times when God has[384] put those challenges before us that we must stay true to our memories of them. The toughest part of life is staying faithful to our songs of deliverance, just as it is life's greatest temptation to drift away from the sacredness of sorrow, allowing the dignified stride of someone who understands how close death is to turn into the stumbling gait of a reckless life. This was Hezekiah's temptation, which is why the story of his fall in the thirty-ninth chapter is placed next to his vows in the thirty-eighth—to remind us how easy it is for those who have emerged victorious from a struggle with death to become vulnerable to ordinary life. He had said, I will walk softly all my years; yet he behaved so arrogantly and foolishly when Merodach-baladan sent an envoy to congratulate him on his recovery. It was not with the dignity of a seasoned veteran, but with a childish desire for attention, and perhaps an overly eager wish to secure an alliance, that he displayed to the envoys his storehouse, the silver, and the gold, and the spices, and the precious oil, and all the house of his armor and all that was found in his treasures. There was nothing which Hezekiah did not show them in his house nor in all his dominion. In this behavior, there was neither caution nor restraint, and we cannot doubt that Hezekiah felt ashamed when Isaiah sternly rebuked him, casting a dark shadow of captivity over his entire household.
It is easier to win spoils from death than to keep them untarnished by life. Shame burns warm in a soldier's heart when he sees the arms he risked life to win rusting for want of a little care. Ours will not burn less if we discover that the strength of character we brought with us out of some great tribulation has been slowly weakened by subsequent self-indulgence of[385] vanity. How awful to have fought for character with death only to squander it upon life! It is well to keep praying, "My God, suffer me not to forget my bonds and my bitterness. In my hours of wealth and ease, and health and peace, by the memory of Thy judgements deliver me, good Lord."
It’s easier to win trophies from death than to keep them spotless from life. Shame burns in a soldier’s heart when he sees the weapons he risked his life for rusting away due to a lack of care. Our shame won’t lessen if we realize that the strength of character we gained from some major struggle has been gradually weakened by later indulgences and vanity. How terrible it is to have fought for character with death only to waste it on life! It's important to keep praying, "My God, don’t let me forget my struggles and my pain. During my times of comfort and ease, health and peace, by the memory of Your judgments, deliver me, good Lord."
II.
II.
So far then Hezekiah is an example and warning to us all. With all our faith in Christ, none of us, in the things mentioned, may hope to excel this Old Testament believer. But notice very particularly that Hezekiah's faith and fortitude are profitable only for this life. It is when we begin to think, What of the life to come? that we perceive the infinite difference Christ has made.
So far, Hezekiah serves as both an example and a warning for all of us. Despite our faith in Christ, none of us can hope to surpass this Old Testament believer in the areas mentioned. However, it's important to note that Hezekiah's faith and strength only benefit him in this life. It's when we start to consider, What about the life to come? that we realize the incredible difference Christ has made.
We know what Hezekiah felt when his back was turned on death, and he came up to life again. But what did he feel when he faced the other way, and his back was to life? With his back to life and facing deathwards, Hezekiah saw nothing, that was worth hoping for. To him to die was to leave God behind him, to leave the face of God as surely as he was leaving the face of man. I said, I shall not see Jah, Jah in the land of the living; I shall gaze upon man no more with the inhabitants of the world. The beyond was not to Hezekiah absolute nothingness, for he had his conceptions, the popular conceptions of his time, of a sort of existence that was passed by those who had been men upon earth. The imagination of his people figured the gloomy portals of a nether world—Sheol, the Hollow (Dante's "hollow realm"), or perhaps the Craving—into which death herds the shades of men, bloodless, voiceless, without love or hope or aught that[386] makes life worth living. With such an existence beyond, to die to life here was to Hezekiah like as when a weaver rolls up the finished web. My life may be a pattern for others to copy, a banner for others to fight under, but for me it is finished. Death has cut it from the loom. Or it was like going into captivity. Mine age is removed and is carried away from me into exile, like a shepherd's tent—exile which to a Jew was the extreme of despair, implying as it did absence from God, and salvation and the possibility of worship. Sheol cannot praise Thee; death cannot celebrate Thee: they that go down into the pit cannot hope for Thy faithfulness.
We understand what Hezekiah felt when he turned away from death and returned to life. But how did he feel when he faced the other way, with his back to life? With his back to life and looking towards death, Hezekiah saw nothing worth hoping for. To him, dying meant leaving God behind, as surely as he was leaving human faces. I said, I shall not see Jah, Jah in the land of the living; I shall gaze upon man no more with the inhabitants of the world. The afterlife wasn’t absolute nothingness for Hezekiah; he had the common beliefs of his time about a kind of existence that those who had lived on earth would enter. His people imagined the dark gates of a lower world—Sheol, the Hollow (Dante's "hollow realm"), or maybe the Craving—where death sends the spirits of men, bloodless, voiceless, without love, hope, or anything that[386] makes life worth living. For Hezekiah, dying to life here was like a weaver rolling up a finished piece. My life may serve as a pattern for others to follow, a banner for others to rally around, but for me, it is done. Death has cut it from the loom. Or it felt like going into captivity. Mine age is removed and is carried away from me into exile, like a shepherd's tent—exile that, for a Jew, meant the ultimate despair, as it signified being away from God, salvation, and the ability to worship. Sheol cannot praise Thee; death cannot celebrate Thee: they that go down into the pit cannot hope for Thy faithfulness.
Of this then at the best Hezekiah was sure: a respite of fifteen years—nothing beyond. Then the shadow would not return upon the dial; and as the king's eyes closed upon the dear faces of his friends, his sense of the countenance of God would die too, and his soul slip into the abyss, hopeless of God's faithfulness.
Of this, Hezekiah was certain at best: a break of fifteen years—nothing more. Then the shadow wouldn’t come back on the sundial; and as the king closed his eyes on the familiar faces of his friends, his awareness of God’s presence would fade too, and his soul would fall into the abyss, despairing of God’s faithfulness.
It is this awful anticlimax, which makes us feel the difference Christ has made. This saint stood in almost the clearest light that revelation cast before Jesus. He was able to perceive in suffering a meaning and derive from it a strength not to be exceeded by any Christian. Yet his faith is profitable for this life alone. For him character may wrestle with death over and over again, and grow the stronger for every grapple, but death wins the last throw.
It’s this terrible anticlimax that highlights the difference Christ has made. This saint stood in what was almost the brightest light that revelation revealed before Jesus. He was able to find meaning in suffering and draw from it a strength that no Christian could surpass. Yet his faith is useful for this life only. For him, character may struggle with death repeatedly and become stronger with every fight, but death ultimately takes the final victory.
It may be said that Hezekiah's despair of the future is simply the morbid thoughts of a sick man or the exaggerated fancies of a poet. "We must not," it is urged, "define a poet's language with the strictness of a theology." True, and we must also make some allowance for a man dying prematurely in the midst of his[387] days. But if this hymn is only poetry, it would have been as easy to poetise on the opposite possibilities across the grave. So quick an imagination as Hezekiah's could not have failed to take advantage of the slightest scintilla of glory that pierced the cloud. It must be that his eye saw none, for all his poetry droops the other way. We seek in heaven for praise in its fulness; there we know God's servants shall see Him face to face. But of this Hezekiah had not the slightest imagination; he anxiously prayed that he might recover to strike the stringed instruments all the days of his life in the house of Jehovah. The living, the living, he praiseth thee, as I do this day; the father to the children shall make known Thy truth. But they that go down into the pit cannot hope for Thy faithfulness.
It could be said that Hezekiah's fear about the future is just the dark thoughts of a sick person or the exaggerated dreams of a poet. "We shouldn't," it is argued, "hold a poet's language to the rigid standards of theology." That's true, and we should also consider the perspective of someone who is facing an untimely death. But if this hymn is just poetry, it would have been just as easy to romanticize the opposite possibilities beyond the grave. With an imagination as vivid as Hezekiah's, he surely would have seized upon even the slightest glimmer of glory that broke through the gloom. It must be that he saw none, as all his poetry leans in the opposite direction. We look to heaven for complete praise; there we know God's servants will see Him face to face. But Hezekiah had no such vision; he prayed anxiously to recover so that he could play the stringed instruments all the days of his life in the house of Jehovah. "The living, the living, they praise you, as I do today; a father will tell his children about Your truth." But "those who go down into the pit cannot hope for Your faithfulness."
Now compare all this with the Psalms of Christian hope; with the faith that fills Paul; with his ardour who says, To me to depart is far better; with the glory which John beholds with open face: the hosts of the redeemed praising God and walking in the light of His face, all the geography of that country laid down, and the plan of the new Jerusalem declared to the very fashion of her stones; with the audacity since of Christian art and song: the rapture of Watts' hymns and the exhilaration of Wesley's praise as they contemplate death; and with the joyful and exact anticipations of so many millions of common men as they turn their faces to the wall. In all these, in even the Book of the Revelation, there is of course a great deal of pure fancy. But imagination never bursts in anywhither till fact has preceded. And it is just because there is a great fact standing between us and Hezekiah that the pureness of our faith and the richness of our imagination of immortality differ so much from his. That fact is[388] Jesus Christ, His resurrection and ascension. It is He who has made all the difference and brought life and immortality to light.
Now compare all this with the Psalms of Christian hope; with the faith that fills Paul; with his enthusiasm when he says, For me, to depart is far better; with the glory that John sees with an open face: the crowds of the redeemed praising God and walking in the light of His presence, the entire geography of that land mapped out, and the design of the new Jerusalem described down to the very details of her stones; with the boldness of Christian art and music: the joy of Watts' hymns and the excitement of Wesley's praise as they think about death; and with the joyful and precise expectations of so many millions of ordinary people as they face their final moments. In all these, even in the Book of Revelation, there is certainly a lot of pure imagination. But imagination doesn't emerge until facts have come first. And it’s precisely because there is a significant fact standing between us and Hezekiah that the purity of our faith and the depth of our imagination about immortality are so different from his. That fact is[388] Jesus Christ, His resurrection and ascension. He is the one who has made all the difference and brought life and immortality into focus.
And we shall know the difference if we lose our faith in that fact. For except Christ be risen from the dead and gone before to a country which derives all its reality and light for our imagination from that Presence, which once walked with us in the flesh, there remains for us only Hezekiah's courage to make the best of a short reprieve, only Hezekiah's outlook into Hades when at last we turn our faces to the wall. But to be stronger and purer for having met with death, as he was, only that we must afterwards succumb, with our purity and our strength, to death—this is surely to be, as Paul said, of all men the most miserable.
And we'll know the difference if we lose our faith in that fact. For unless Christ has risen from the dead and gone ahead to a place that gets all its reality and light from that Presence, which once walked among us in the flesh, there's nothing left for us but Hezekiah's courage to make the most of a brief stay of execution, only Hezekiah's view into Hades when we finally turn our faces to the wall. But to be stronger and purer for having faced death, as he was, just to have to submit afterward, with our purity and strength, to death—this is surely to be, as Paul said, the most miserable of all men.
Better far to own the power of an endless life, which Christ has sealed to us, and translate Hezekiah's experience into the new calculus of immortality. If to have faced death as he did was to inherit dignity and peace and sense of power, what glory of kingship and queenship must sit upon those faces in the other world who have been at closer quarters still with the King of terrors, and through Christ their strength have spoiled him of his sting and victory! To have felt the worst of death and to have triumphed—this is the secret of the peaceful hearts, unfaltering looks and faces of glory, which pass in solemn procession of worship through all eternity before the throne of God.
Better to possess the power of eternal life, which Christ has promised us, and to reinterpret Hezekiah's experience in light of the new understanding of immortality. If facing death as he did brought him dignity, peace, and a sense of power, then what kind of glory must radiate from those in the next life who have confronted death even more closely and, through Christ, have overcome its sting and defeat! To have experienced the worst of death and emerged victorious—this is the key to the peaceful hearts, steadfast looks, and radiant faces of glory, which move in solemn procession of worship through all eternity before the throne of God.
We shall consider the Old Testament views of a future life and resurrection more fully in chaps. xxvii. and xxx. of this volume.
We will look at the Old Testament perspectives on life after death and resurrection in more detail in chapters 27 and 30 of this volume.
CHAPTER XXVI.
HAD ISAIAH A GOSPEL FOR THE INDIVIDUAL?
The two narratives, in which Isaiah's career culminates—that of the Deliverance of Jerusalem (xxxvi.; xxxvii.) and that of the Recovery of Hezekiah (xxxviii.; xxxix.)—cannot fail, coming together as they do, to suggest to thoughtful readers a striking contrast between Isaiah's treatment of the community and his treatment of the individual, between his treatment of the Church and his treatment of single members. For in the first of these narratives we are told how an illimitable future, elsewhere so gloriously described by the prophet, was secured for the Church upon earth; but the whole result of the second is the gain for a representative member of the Church of a respite of fifteen years. Nothing, as we have seen, is promised to the dying Hezekiah of a future life; no scintilla of the light of eternity sparkles either in Isaiah's promise or in Hezekiah's prayer. The net result of the incident is a reprieve of fifteen years: fifteen years of a character strengthened, indeed, by having met with death, but, it would sadly seem, only in order to become again the prey of the vanities of this world (chap. xxxix.). So meagre a result for the individual stands strangely out against the perpetual glory and peace assured to the community. And it suggests this question: Had[390] Isaiah any real gospel for the individual? If so, what was it?
The two stories that highlight Isaiah's career—the Deliverance of Jerusalem (xxxvi.; xxxvii.) and the Recovery of Hezekiah (xxxviii.; xxxix.)—clearly present a sharp contrast for thoughtful readers between Isaiah's approach to the community and his approach to individuals, between how he treats the Church and individual members. In the first story, we see how a limitless future, described so gloriously by the prophet, was secured for the Church on earth. However, the outcome of the second story offers only a fifteen-year extension for one representative member of the Church. As we noted, nothing is promised to the dying Hezekiah about an afterlife; there's no hint of eternal light in either Isaiah's promise or Hezekiah's prayer. The end result of this incident is merely a fifteen-year reprieve: a period during which Hezekiah's character is indeed strengthened through confronting death, but it seems only to lead him back to the distractions of this world (chap. xxxix.). Such a minimal result for the individual sharply contrasts with the lasting glory and peace promised to the community. This raises the question: Did Isaiah have any real message for the individual? If so, what was it?
First of all, we must remember that God in His providence seldom gives to one prophet or generation more than a single main problem for solution. In Isaiah's day undoubtedly the most urgent problem—and Divine problems are ever practical, not philosophical—was the continuance of the Church upon earth. It had really got to be a matter of doubt whether a body of people possessing the knowledge of the true God, and able to transfuse and transmit it, could possibly survive among the political convulsions of the world, and in consequence of its own sin. Isaiah's problem was the reformation and survival of the Church. In accordance with this, we notice how many of his terms are collective, and how he almost never addresses the individual. It is the people, upon whom he calls—the nation, Israel, the house of Jacob My vineyard, the men of Judah His pleasant plantation. To these we may add the apostrophes to the city of Jerusalem, under many personifications: Ariel, Ariel, inhabitress of Zion, daughter of Zion. When Isaiah denounces sin, the sinner is either the whole community or a class in the community, very seldom an individual, though there are some instances of the latter, as Ahaz and Shebna. It is This people hath rejected, or The people would not. When Jerusalem collapsed, although there must have been many righteous men still within her, Isaiah said, What aileth thee that all belonging to thee have gone up to the housetops? (xxii. 1). His language is wholesale. When he is not attacking society, he attacks classes or groups: the rulers, the land-grabbers, the drunkards, the sinners, the judges, the house of David, the priests and the prophets, the women. And the sins of these he describes in their[391] social effects, or in their results upon the fate of the whole people; but he never, except in two cases, gives us their individual results. He does not make evident, like Jesus or Paul, the eternal damage a man's sin inflicts on his own soul.
First of all, we need to remember that God rarely gives one prophet or generation more than one main issue to solve. In Isaiah's time, the most pressing issue—since God's problems are always practical, not philosophical—was the survival of the Church on earth. It had become uncertain whether a group of people who knew the true God and could share that knowledge could survive amidst the world's political turmoil and their own sins. Isaiah's challenge was to reform and keep the Church alive. Accordingly, we see how many of his terms reference groups rather than individuals. He often speaks to the people—the nation, Israel, the house of Jacob, My vineyard, the men of Judah, His pleasant plantation. We can add his calls to the city of Jerusalem, personified in various ways: Ariel, Ariel, inhabitant of Zion, daughter of Zion. When Isaiah speaks against sin, he generally addresses the entire community or a specific group within it, rather than individuals, although there are a few exceptions like Ahaz and Shebna. He says things like This people has rejected or The people would not. When Jerusalem fell, even with many righteous people still within it, Isaiah asked, What troubles you that all belonging to you have gone up to the rooftops? (xxii. 1). His language tends to focus on the larger picture. When he’s not criticizing society, he points out issues with specific groups: the rulers, the land-grabbers, the drunkards, the sinners, the judges, the house of David, the priests and the prophets, the women. He describes their sins in terms of their social impact or their consequences for the fate of the entire community, but he rarely, except in two instances, discusses their effects on individuals. Unlike Jesus or Paul, he doesn’t clearly show the lasting harm a person's sin does to their own soul.
Similarly when Isaiah speaks of God's grace and salvation the objects of these are again collective—the remnant; the escaped (also a collective noun); a holy seed; a stock or stump. It is a restored nation whom he sees under the Messiah, the perpetuity and glory of a city and a State. What we consider to be a most personal and particularly individual matter—the forgiveness of sin—he promises, with two exceptions, only to the community: This people that dwelleth therein hath its iniquity forgiven. We can understand all this social, collective and wholesale character of his language only if we keep in mind his Divinely appointed work—the substance and perpetuity of a purified and secure Church of God.
Similarly, when Isaiah talks about God's grace and salvation, the subjects are again collective—the remnant; the escaped (also a collective term); a holy seed; a stock or stump. He envisions a restored nation under the Messiah, with the lasting glory of a city and a State. What we see as a deeply personal and individual issue—the forgiveness of sin—he promises, with two exceptions, only to the community: This people that dwelleth therein hath its iniquity forgiven. We can grasp the social, collective, and sweeping nature of his language only if we remember his Divinely appointed mission—the essence and continuity of a purified and secure Church of God.
Had Isaiah then no gospel for the individual? This will indeed seem impossible to us if we keep in view the following considerations:—
Had Isaiah then no message for the individual? This will definitely seem impossible to us if we consider the following points:—
1. Isaiah himself had passed through a powerfully individual experience. He had not only felt the solidarity of the people's sin—I dwell among a people of unclean lips—he had first felt his own particular guilt: I am a man of unclean lips. One who suffered the private experiences which are recounted in chap. vi.; whose own eyes had seen the King, Jehovah of hosts; who had gathered on his own lips his guilt and felt the fire come from heaven's altar by an angelic messenger specially to purify him; who had further devoted himself to God's service with so thrilling a sense of his own responsibility, and had so thereby felt his solitary and individual[392] mission—he surely was not behind the very greatest of Christian saints in the experience of guilt, of personal obligation to grace and of personal responsibility. Though the record of Isaiah's ministry contains no narratives, such as fill the ministries of Jesus and Paul, of anxious care for individuals, could he who wrote of himself that sixth chapter have failed to deal with men as Jesus dealt with Nicodemus, or Paul with the Philippian gaoler? It is not picturesque fancy, nor merely a reflection of the New Testament temper, if we realize Isaiah's intervals of relief from political labour and religious reform occupied with an attention to individual interests, which necessarily would not obtain the permanent record of his public ministry. But whether this be so or not, the sixth chapter teaches that for Isaiah all public conscience and public labour found its necessary preparation in personal religion.
1. Isaiah himself went through a deeply personal experience. He not only understood the shared guilt of his people—I dwell among a people of unclean lips—but also recognized his own specific wrongdoing: I am a man of unclean lips. He endured the private experiences described in chap. vi.; whose own eyes had seen the King, Jehovah of hosts; who had gathered his guilt on his own lips and felt the fire from heaven's altar sent by an angel to purify him; who then committed himself to God's service with a profound sense of his own responsibility, feeling his unique [392] mission—he was certainly not less than the greatest Christian saints in experiencing guilt, recognizing the importance of grace, and understanding personal responsibility. Although Isaiah's ministry lacks personal stories like those found in the ministries of Jesus and Paul, could the writer of that sixth chapter have failed to engage with individuals the way Jesus did with Nicodemus, or Paul with the Philippian jailer? It’s not just a colorful imagination or a simple reflection of the New Testament spirit if we recognize that Isaiah's breaks from political duties and religious reform were focused on personal interests, which may not have been recorded in his public ministry. Regardless of this, the sixth chapter shows that for Isaiah, all public conscience and public work were rooted in personal faith.
2. But, again, Isaiah had an Individual for his ideal. To him the future was not only an established State; it was equally, it was first, a glorious king. Isaiah was an Oriental. We moderns of the West place our reliance upon institutions; we go forward upon ideas. In the East it is personal influence that tells, persons who are expected, followed and fought for. The history of the West is the history of the advance of thought, of the rise and decay of institutions, to which the greatest individuals are more or less subordinate. The history of the East is the annals of personalities; justice and energy in a ruler, not political principles, are what impress the Oriental imagination. Isaiah has carried this Oriental hope to a distinct and lofty pitch. The Hero whom he exalts on the margin of the future, as its Author, is not only a person of great majesty, but a character of considerable decision.[393] At first only the rigorous virtues of the ruler are attributed to Him (chap. xi. 1 ff.), but afterwards the graces and influence of a much broader and sweeter humanity (xxxii. 2). Indeed, in this latter oracle we saw that Isaiah spoke not so much of his great Hero, as of what any individual might become. A man, he says, shall be as an hiding-place from the wind. Personal influence is the spring of social progress, the shelter and fountain force of the community. In the following verses the effect of so pure and inspiring a presence is traced in the discrimination of individual character—each man standing out for what he is—which Isaiah defines as his second requisite for social progress. In all this there is much for the individual to ponder, much to inspire him with a sense of the value and responsibility of his own character, and with the certainty that by himself he shall be judged and by himself stand or fall. The worthless person shall be no more called princely, nor the knave said to be bountiful.
2. But again, Isaiah had an Individual for their ideal. To him, the future wasn’t just an established State; it was also, and primarily, a glorious king. Isaiah was from the East. We modern Westerners rely on institutions and move forward based on ideas. In the East, it's personal influence that matters—people who are expected, followed, and fought for. The history of the West is all about the progress of thought, the rise and fall of institutions, to which even the greatest individuals are somewhat subordinate. The history of the East is a record of personalities; qualities like justice and strength in a leader, rather than political principles, captivate the Oriental imagination. Isaiah has taken this Oriental hope to a distinct and elevated level. The Hero he champions at the edge of the future, as its Creator, is not only a figure of immense dignity but also one of significant resolve.[393] At first, only the strict virtues of the ruler are ascribed to Him (chap. xi. 1 ff.), but later on, the qualities and influence of a much broader and kinder humanity emerge (xxxii. 2). In fact, in this latter proclamation, we see that Isaiah is talking not just about his great Hero but about what any individual could become. A man, he says, shall be as a hiding place from the wind. Personal influence is the driving force of social progress, the refuge and source of strength for the community. In the following verses, the impact of such a pure and inspiring presence is illustrated by the distinction of individual character—each person standing out for who they are—which Isaiah defines as his second requirement for social progress. In all this, there is a lot for the individual to reflect on, much to inspire a sense of the value and responsibility of one’s own character, and the understanding that one will be judged by oneself and will either stand or fall on their own. The worthless person shall no longer be called noble, nor the dishonest said to be generous.
3. If any details of character are wanting in the picture of Isaiah's Hero, they are supplied by Hezekiah's Self-analysis (chap. xxxviii.). We need not repeat what we have said in the previous chapter of the king's appreciation of what is the strength of a man's character, and particularly of how character grows by grappling with death. In this matter the most experienced of Christian saints may learn from Isaiah's pupil.
3. If there are any missing details about Isaiah's Hero, they are filled in by Hezekiah's Self-Reflection (chap. xxxviii.). We don't need to reiterate what we discussed in the previous chapter about the king's understanding of what makes a person's character strong, especially how character develops through facing death. In this regard, even the most seasoned Christian saints can learn from Isaiah's student.
Isaiah had then, without doubt, a gospel for the individual; and to this day the individual may plainly read it in his book, may truly, strongly, joyfully live by it—so deeply does it begin, so much does it help to self-knowledge and self-analysis, so lofty are the ideals and responsibilities which it presents. But is it true that Isaiah's gospel is for this life only?
Isaiah definitely had a message for individuals; and to this day, anyone can easily read it in his book, and genuinely, powerfully, joyfully live by it—so profound is its beginning, so much does it contribute to self-awareness and self-reflection, so high are the ideals and responsibilities it offers. But is it really true that Isaiah's message is only for this life?
[394]Was Isaiah's silence on the immortality of the individual due wholly to the cause we have suggested in the beginning of this chapter—that God gives to each prophet his single problem, and that the problem of Isaiah was the endurance of the Church upon earth? There is no doubt that this is only partly the explanation.
[394]Was Isaiah's lack of comment on individual immortality entirely because of the reason we mentioned at the start of this chapter—that God assigns each prophet a specific issue, and Isaiah's issue was the survival of the Church on earth? It's clear that this is only part of the explanation.
The Hebrew belonged to a branch of humanity—the Semitic—which, as its history proves, was unable to develop any strong imagination of, or practical interest in, a future life apart from foreign influence or Divine revelation. The pagan Arabs laughed at Mahommed when he preached to them of the Resurrection; and even to-day, after twelve centuries of Moslem influence, their descendants in the centre of Arabia, according to the most recent authority,[73] fail to form a clear conception of, or indeed to take almost any practical interest in, another world. The northern branch of the race, to which the Hebrews belonged, derived from an older civilisation a prospect of Hades, that their own fancy developed with great elaboration. This prospect, however, which we shall describe fully in connection with chaps. xiv. and xxvi., was one absolutely hostile to the interests of character in this life. It brought all men, whatever their life had been on earth, at last to a dead level of unsubstantial and hopeless existence. Good and evil, strong and weak, pious and infidel, alike became shades, joyless and hopeless, without even the power to praise God. We have seen in Hezekiah's case how such a prospect unnerved the most pious souls, and that revelation, even though represented at his bedside by an Isaiah, offered him no hope of an issue from it. The strength[395] of character, however, which Hezekiah professes to have won in grappling with death, added to the closeness of communion with God which he enjoyed in this life, only brings out the absurdity of such a conclusion to life as the prospect of Sheol offered to the individual. If he was a pious man, if he was a man who had never felt himself deserted by God in this life, he was bound to revolt from so God-forsaken an existence after death. This was actually the line along which the Hebrew spirit went out to victory over those gloomy conceptions of death, that were yet unbroken by a risen Christ. Thou wilt not, the saint triumphantly cried, leave my soul in Sheol, nor wilt Thou suffer Thine holy one to see corruption. It was faith in the almightiness and reasonableness of God's ways, it was conviction of personal righteousness, it was the sense that the Lord would not desert His own in death, which sustained the believer in face of that awful shadow through which no light of revelation had yet broken.
The Hebrews were part of a group of people—the Semitic—who, as history shows, struggled to envision or take a real interest in an afterlife without outside influence or divine revelation. The pagan Arabs mocked Muhammad when he told them about the Resurrection; even today, after twelve centuries of Islamic influence, their descendants in central Arabia, according to the latest research,[73] still have a vague idea of and hardly any real interest in another world. The northern branch of their race, which included the Hebrews, inherited from an older civilization a view of Hades that their own imagination elaborated on. However, this view, which we will describe in detail in chapters xiv. and xxvi., was completely against the idea of character in this life. It reduced all people, regardless of how they lived on earth, to a flat and hopeless existence. Good and evil, strong and weak, devout and non-believer, all turned into mere shades, joyless and despairing, lacking even the ability to praise God. We’ve seen in Hezekiah's case how such a view weakened even the most devout individuals, and that revelation, even when brought to him at his bedside by Isaiah, offered him no hope of escape. The strength[395] of character that Hezekiah claimed to have gained in facing death, combined with the closeness to God he experienced in this life, only highlighted the ridiculousness of the conclusion that life might end in such a fate as the outlook of Sheol for an individual. If he was a faithful man, one who had never felt abandoned by God in life, he was bound to reject such a Godforsaken existence after death. This was indeed the path through which the Hebrew spirit triumphed over the dark ideas of death that had yet to be transformed by a risen Christ. You will not, the saint joyfully declared, leave my soul in Sheol, nor will You allow Your holy one to see corruption. It was faith in the power and fairness of God's ways, belief in personal righteousness, and the conviction that the Lord would not abandon His own in death that sustained the believer against that terrible shadow through which no light of revelation had yet shone.
If these, then, were the wings by which a believing soul under the Old Testament soared over the grave, Isaiah may be said to have contributed to the hope of personal immortality just in so far as he strengthened them. By enhancing as he did the value and beauty of individual character, by emphasizing the indwelling of God's Spirit, he was bringing life and immortality to light, even though he spoke no word to the dying about the fact of a glorious life beyond the grave. By assisting to create in the individual that character and sense of God, which alone could assure him he would never die, but pass from the praise of the Lord in this life to a nearer enjoyment of His presence beyond, Isaiah was working along the only line by which the Spirit of God seems to[396] have assisted the Hebrew mind to an assurance of heaven.
If these were the wings that allowed a faithful soul in the Old Testament to rise above the grave, we can say that Isaiah helped build the hope of personal immortality by strengthening them. By enhancing the importance and beauty of individual character and highlighting the presence of God's Spirit, he was bringing life and immortality to light, even though he never directly mentioned a glorious life after death to those who were dying. By fostering in individuals that character and awareness of God, which alone could ensure them they would never truly die but would transition from praising the Lord in this life to experiencing His presence more fully afterward, Isaiah was advancing the only path through which the Spirit of God seems to have guided the Hebrew mind to the assurance of heaven.
But further in his favourite gospel of the Reasonableness of God—that God does not work fruitlessly, nor create and cultivate with a view to judgement and destruction—Isaiah was furnishing an argument for personal immortality, the force of which has not been exhausted. In a recent work on The Destiny of Man[74] the philosophic author maintains the reasonableness of the Divine methods as a ground of belief both in the continued progress of the race upon earth and in the immortality of the individual. "From the first dawning of life we see all things working together towards one mighty goal—the evolution of the most exalted and spiritual faculties which characterize humanity. Has all this work been done for nothing? Is it all ephemeral, all a bubble that bursts, a vision that fades? On such a view the riddle of the universe becomes a riddle without a meaning. The more thoroughly we comprehend the process of evolution by which things have come to be what they are, the more we are likely to feel that to deny the everlasting persistence of the spiritual element in man is to rob the whole process of its meaning. It goes far towards putting us to permanent intellectual confusion. For my own part, I believe in the immortality of the soul, not in the sense in which I accept demonstrable truths of science, but as a supreme act of faith in the reasonableness of God's work."
But further along in his favorite gospel of the God's Reasonableness—that God doesn't act in vain, nor create and nurture with the intention of judgment and destruction—Isaiah was making a case for personal immortality, the strength of which hasn't been diminished. In a recent work on The Destiny of Man[74], the philosophical author argues for the reasonableness of Divine actions as a basis for belief in both the ongoing progress of humanity on earth and the immortality of individuals. "From the very beginning of life, we see everything working towards a single great goal—the development of the highest and most spiritual qualities that define humanity. Has all this effort been pointless? Is it all temporary, just a bubble that bursts, a vision that fades away? Viewing it this way makes the mystery of the universe a mystery without meaning. The more we understand the process of evolution that has shaped things as they are, the more we might feel that to deny the eternal existence of the spiritual aspect in humans robs the entire process of its significance. It can lead us to lasting intellectual confusion. Personally, I believe in the immortality of the soul, not in the same way I accept proven scientific facts, but as a profound act of faith in the reasonableness of God's work."
From the same argument Isaiah drew only the former of these two conclusions. To him the certainty that God's people would survive the impending deluge[397] of Assyria's brute force was based on his faith that the Lord is a God of judgement, of reasonable law and method, and could not have created or fostered so spiritual a people only to destroy them. The progress of religion upon earth was certain. But does not Isaiah's method equally make for the immortality of the individual? He did not draw this conclusion, but he laid down its premises with a confidence and richness of illustration that have never been excelled.
From the same argument, Isaiah reached only the first of these two conclusions. For him, the certainty that God's people would endure the coming flood[397] of Assyria's brutal force was rooted in his belief that the Lord is a God of judgement, of rational law and order, and could not have created or nurtured such a spiritual people just to see them destroyed. The growth of religion on earth was guaranteed. But doesn't Isaiah's approach also support the idea of individual immortality? He didn’t make this conclusion, but he established its foundations with a confidence and richness of examples that have never been surpassed.
BOOK V.
PROPHECIES NOT RELATING TO ISAIAH'S TIME.
Isaiah:— |
xiii.-xiv. 23 |
xxiv.-xxvii. |
xxxiv. |
xxxv. |
BOOK V.
In the first thirty-nine chapters of the Book of Isaiah—the half which refers to the prophet's own career and the politics contemporary with that—we find four or five prophecies containing no reference to Isaiah himself nor to any Jewish king under whom he laboured, and painting both Israel and the foreign world in quite a different state from that in which they lay during his lifetime. These prophecies are chap. xiii., an Oracle announcing the Fall of Babylon, with its appendix, chap. xiv. 1-23, the Promise of Israel's Deliverance and an Ode upon the Fall of the Babylonian Tyrant; chaps. xxiv.-xxvii., a series of Visions of the breaking up of the universe, of restoration from exile, and even of resurrection from the dead; chap. xxxiv., the Vengeance of the Lord upon Edom; and chap. xxxv., a Song of Return from Exile.
In the first thirty-nine chapters of the Book of Isaiah—the part that deals with the prophet's own experiences and the politics of his time—we find four or five prophecies that don’t mention Isaiah himself or any Jewish king he served under. These prophecies describe both Israel and the surrounding world in a completely different situation from how they were during his lifetime. These prophecies include chapter 13, an Oracle predicting the Fall of Babylon, followed by chapter 14:1-23, which promises Israel's Deliverance and includes a poem about the fall of the Babylonian ruler; chapters 24-27, a series of Visions of the breakdown of the universe, the restoration from exile, and even resurrection from the dead; chapter 34, which discusses the Lord's Revenge on Edom; and chapter 35, a Song of Return from Exile.
In these prophecies Assyria is no longer the dominant world-force, nor Jerusalem the inviolate fortress of God and His people. If Assyria or Egypt is mentioned, it is but as one of the three classical enemies of Israel; and Babylon is represented as the head and front of the hostile world. The Jews are no longer in political freedom and possession of their own land; they are either in exile or just returned from it to a depopulated country. With these altered circumstances come another temper and new doctrine. The horizon is[402] different, and the hopes that flush in dawn upon it are not quite the same as those which we have contemplated with Isaiah in his immediate future. It is no longer the repulse of the heathen invader; the inviolateness of the sacred city; the recovery of the people from the shock of attack, and of the land from the trampling of armies. But it is the people in exile, the overthrow of the tyrant in his own home, the opening of prison doors, the laying down of a highway through the wilderness, the triumph of return and the resumption of worship. There is, besides, a promise of the resurrection, which we have not found in the prophecies we have considered.
In these prophecies, Assyria is no longer the leading global power, nor is Jerusalem the unassailable stronghold of God and His people. If Assyria or Egypt is mentioned, it’s only as one of Israel's three traditional enemies; Babylon is depicted as the main force of the hostile world. The Jews are no longer politically free or in possession of their own land; they are either in exile or have just returned to a desolate country. With these changed circumstances come a different outlook and new teachings. The view is[402] different, and the hopes that light up the new dawn are not quite the same as those we observed with Isaiah regarding his immediate future. It’s no longer about repelling the pagan invader, the inviolability of the holy city, the people's recovery from the shock of attacks, or the land's restoration from invading armies. Instead, it focuses on the people in exile, the tyrant's downfall in his own territory, the opening of prison doors, the construction of a highway through the wilderness, the joy of returning, and the resumption of worship. Additionally, there’s a promise of resurrection that we haven't encountered in the prophecies we've examined.
With such differences, it is not wonderful that many have denied the authorship of these few prophecies to Isaiah. This is a question that can be looked at calmly. It touches no dogma of the Christian faith. Especially it does not involve the other question, so often—and, we venture to say, so unjustly—started on this point, Could not the Spirit of God have inspired Isaiah to foresee all that the prophecies in question foretell, even though he lived more than a century before the people were in circumstances to understand them? Certainly, God is almighty. The question is not, Could He have done this? but one somewhat different: Did He do it? and to this an answer can be had only from the prophecies themselves. If these mark the Babylonian hostility or captivity as already upon Israel, this is a testimony of Scripture itself, which we cannot overlook, and beside which even unquestionable traces of similarity to Isaiah's style or the fact that these oracles are bound up with Isaiah's own undoubted prophecies have little weight. "Facts" of style will be regarded with suspicion by any one who knows how they are[403] employed by both sides in such a question as this; while the certainty that the Book of Isaiah was put into its present form subsequently to his life will permit of,—and the evident purpose of Scripture to secure moral impressiveness rather than historical consecutiveness will account for,—later oracles being bound up with unquestioned utterances of Isaiah.
With these differences, it's not surprising that many have questioned whether Isaiah actually wrote these few prophecies. This is a topic we can discuss rationally. It doesn't challenge any core Christian beliefs. Specifically, it doesn't relate to the often debated—and, we believe, unfairly raised—issue of whether the Spirit of God could have inspired Isaiah to predict everything the prophecies talk about, even though he lived over a century before the people were in a position to understand them. Of course, God is all-powerful. The real question isn't whether He could have done this, but whether He actually did. The answer can only come from examining the prophecies themselves. If these prophecies indicate that Babylonian hostility or captivity was already upon Israel, this is a clear statement from Scripture that we cannot ignore. This fact outweighs even strong similarities to Isaiah's style or the connection of these oracles with his well-known prophecies. Observations about style will seem questionable to anyone who understands how they are used by both sides in a debate like this. Meanwhile, the certainty that the Book of Isaiah was compiled into its current form after his lifetime—and the clear intention of Scripture to emphasize moral impact rather than strict historical accuracy—allows for later oracles to be linked with Isaiah's verified statements.
Only one of the prophecies in question confirms the tradition that it is by Isaiah, viz., chap. xiii., which bears the title Oracle of Babylon which Isaiah, son of Amoz, did see; but titles are themselves so much the report of tradition, being of a later date than the rest of the text, that it is best to argue the question apart from them.
Only one of the prophecies in question confirms the tradition that it is by Isaiah, namely, chap. xiii., which has the title Oracle of Babylon which Isaiah, son of Amoz, did see; however, titles are often just a reflection of tradition and were added later than the rest of the text, so it's better to discuss the issue without relying on them.
On the other hand, Isaiah's authorship of these prophecies, or at least the possibility of his having written them, is usually defended by appealing to his promise of the return from exile in chap. xi. and his threat of a Babylonish captivity in chap. xxxix. This is an argument that has not been fairly met by those who deny the Isaianic authorship of chaps. xiii.-xiv. 23, xxiv.-xxvii., and xxxv. It is a strong argument, for while, as we have seen (p. 201), there are good grounds for believing Isaiah to have been likely to make such a prediction of a Babylonish captivity as is attributed to him in chap. xxxix. 6, almost all the critics agree in leaving chap. xi. to him. But if chap. xi. is Isaiah's, then he undoubtedly spoke of an exile much more extensive than had taken place by his own day. Nevertheless, even this ability in xi. to foretell an exile so vast does not account for passages in xiii.-xiv. 23, xxiv.-xxvii., which represent the Exile either as present or as actually over. No one who reads these chapters without prejudice can fail to feel the force of such passages in leading him to decide for an exilic or post-exilic authorship (see pp. 429 ff.)
On the other hand, Isaiah's authorship of these prophecies, or at least the possibility that he wrote them, is usually supported by referencing his promise of a return from exile in chap. xi. and his warning of a Babylonian captivity in chap. xxxix. This is an argument that hasn't been adequately addressed by those who reject the idea that Isaiah authored chaps. xiii.-xiv. 23, xxiv.-xxvii., and xxxv. It's a compelling argument because, as we've discussed (p. 201), there are solid reasons to believe Isaiah likely made the prediction of a Babylonian captivity that is attributed to him in chap. xxxix. 6, and almost all critics agree that chap. xi. belongs to him. But if chap. xi. is Isaiah's work, then he must have been referring to an exile much broader than what happened in his own time. Still, this ability to predict such a vast exile in chap. xi. doesn't explain passages in xiii.-xiv. 23, xxiv.-xxvii., which depict the Exile as either happening now or already finished. Anyone reading these chapters without bias can't help but be convinced by these passages to lean towards an exilic or post-exilic authorship (see pp. 429 ff.)
[404]Another argument against attributing these prophecies to Isaiah is that their visions of the last things, representing as they do a judgement on the whole world, and even the destruction of the whole material universe, are incompatible with Isaiah's loftiest and final hope of an inviolate Zion at last relieved and secure, of a land freed from invasion and wondrously fertile, with all the converted world, Assyria and Egypt, gathered round it as a centre. This question, however, is seriously complicated by the fact that in his youth Isaiah did undoubtedly prophesy a shaking of the whole world and the destruction of its inhabitants, and by the probability that his old age survived into a period, whose abounding sin would again make natural such wholesale predictions of judgement as we find in chap. xxiv.
[404]Another argument against linking these prophecies to Isaiah is that their visions of the end times, which depict a judgment on the entire world and even the destruction of the whole material universe, clash with Isaiah's highest and ultimate hope for an untouched Zion that is finally safe and secure, a land free from invasion and remarkably fertile, with all of the converted world, including Assyria and Egypt, gathered around it as a center. However, this issue is further complicated by the fact that in his youth, Isaiah did indeed prophesy a shaking of the entire world and the destruction of its inhabitants, as well as the likelihood that his old age extended into a time when rampant sin would once again make such sweeping predictions of judgment, like those in chap. xxiv, seem natural.
Still, let the question of the eschatology be as obscure as we have shown, there remains this clear issue. In some chapters of the Book of Isaiah, which, from our knowledge of the circumstances of his times, we know must have been published while he was alive, we learn that the Jewish people has never left its land, nor lost its independence under Jehovah's anointed, and that the inviolateness of Zion and the retreat of the Assyrian invaders of Judah, without effecting the captivity of the Jews, are absolutely essential to the endurance of God's kingdom on earth. In other chapters we find that the Jews have left their land, have been long in exile (or from other passages have just returned), and that the religious essential is no more the independence of the Jewish State under a theocratic king, but only the resumption of the Temple worship. Is it possible for one man to have written both these sets of chapters? Is it possible for one age to have produced them? That is the whole question.
Still, no matter how unclear the question of eschatology may be, there remains this straightforward issue. In some chapters of the Book of Isaiah, which we know were published during his lifetime based on the context of his times, we learn that the Jewish people have never left their land or lost their independence under Jehovah's anointed one, and that the sanctity of Zion and the retreat of the Assyrian invaders from Judah, without leading to the captivity of the Jews, are absolutely crucial for the continuation of God's kingdom on earth. In other chapters, we see that the Jews have left their land, have been in exile for a long time (or have just returned according to other passages), and that the religious focus is no longer on the independence of the Jewish State under a theocratic king, but only on restoring Temple worship. Is it possible for one person to have written both of these groups of chapters? Is it feasible for one era to have produced them? That is the entire question.
CHAPTER XXVII.
BABYLON AND LUCIFER.
Isaiah xiii. 2-xiv. 23 (DATE UNCERTAIN).
Isaiah 13:2-14:23 (DATE UNCERTAIN).
This double oracle is against the City (xiii. 2-xiv. 2) and the Tyrant (xiv. 3-23) of Babylon.
This double prophecy is directed at the City (xiii. 2-xiv. 2) and the Tyrant (xiv. 3-23) of Babylon.
I. The Wicked City (xiii. 2-xiv. 23).
I. The Wicked City (xiii. 2-xiv. 23).
The first part is a series of hurried and vanishing scenes—glimpses of ruin and deliverance caught through the smoke and turmoil of a Divine war. The drama opens with the erection of a gathering standard upon a bare mountain (ver. 2). He who gives the order explains it (ver. 3), but is immediately interrupted by Hark! a tumult on the mountains, like a great people. Hark! the surge of the kingdoms of nations gathering together. Jehovah of hosts is mustering the host of war. It is the day of Jehovah that is near, the day of His war and of His judgement upon the world.
The first part is a series of rushed and fleeting scenes—glimpses of destruction and salvation captured through the smoke and chaos of a Divine war. The drama begins with the raising of a gathering standard on a bare mountain (ver. 2). The one giving the order explains it (ver. 3), but is quickly interrupted by Listen! There's a commotion on the mountains, like a vast crowd. Listen! The roar of the kingdoms of nations coming together. Jehovah of hosts is assembling the army for battle. It is the day of Jehovah that is near, the day of His war and of His judgement upon the world.
This Old Testament expression, the day of the Lord, starts so many ideas that it is difficult to seize any one of them and say this is just what is meant. For day with a possessive pronoun suggests what has been appointed aforehand, or what must come round in its turn; means also opportunity and triumph, and also swift performance after long delay. All these thoughts are excited when we couple a day with any person's name. And therefore as with every dawn some one awakes[406] saying, This is my day; as with every dawn comes some one's chance, some soul gets its wish, some will shows what it can do, some passion or principle issues into fact: so God also shall have His day, on which His justice and power shall find their full scope and triumph. Suddenly and simply, like any dawn that takes its turn on the round of time, the great decision and victory of Divine justice shall at last break out of the long delay of ages. Howl ye, for the day of Jehovah is near; as destruction from the Destructive does it come. Very savage and quite universal is its punishment. Every human heart melteth. Countless faces, white with terror, light up its darkness like flames. Sinners are to be exterminated out of the earth; the world is to be punished for its iniquity. Heaven, the stars, sun and moon aid the horror and the darkness, heaven shivering above, the earth quaking beneath; and between, the peoples like shepherdless sheep drive to and fro through awful carnage.
This Old Testament phrase, the day of the Lord, brings up so many ideas that it’s hard to pinpoint exactly what it means. The word day combined with a possessive pronoun suggests something that has been predetermined or something that is bound to come around; it also signifies opportunity and triumph, as well as quick action after a long wait. All these thoughts are stirred when we pair a day with any individual’s name. Just as with each dawn someone wakes up thinking, “This is my day,” at every new day comes someone’s opportunity, someone gets their wish, someone’s abilities are showcased, and some passion or principle becomes reality: in the same way, God will have His day, when His justice and power will fully reveal themselves and triumph. Suddenly and straightforwardly, just like any dawn that occurs in the cycle of time, the great decision and victory of Divine justice will finally emerge from the long wait of ages. Howl ye, for the day of Jehovah is near; as destruction from the Destructive does it come. Its punishment is brutally harsh and universally applied. Every human heart melts. Countless faces, pale with terror, illuminate the darkness like flames. Sinners are to be exterminated out of the earth; the world is to be punished for its iniquity. Heaven, along with the stars, sun, and moon, contributes to the horror and darkness, the heavens trembling above, the earth shaking below; and in between, the people wander like lost sheep amid horrific carnage.
From ver. 17 the mist lifts a little. The vague turmoil clears up into a siege of Babylon by the Medians, and then settles down into Babylon's ruin and abandonment to wild beasts. Finally (xiv. 1) comes the religious reason of so much convulsion: For Jehovah will have compassion upon Jacob, and choose again Israel, and settle them upon their own ground; and the foreign sojourner shall join himself to them, and they shall associate themselves to the house of Jacob.
From verse 17, the fog begins to lift a bit. The unclear chaos transforms into a siege of Babylon by the Medes, and then it settles into Babylon's destruction and abandonment to wild animals. Finally (xiv. 1) comes the spiritual reason for all this upheaval: For the Lord will show compassion to Jacob, and choose Israel again, and establish them in their own land; and the foreigner will join them, and they will connect themselves to the house of Jacob.
This prophecy evidently came to a people already in captivity—a very different circumstance of the Church of God from that in which we have seen her under Isaiah. But upon this new stage it is still the same old conquest. Assyria has fallen, but Babylon has taken her place. The old spirit of cruelty and[407] covetousness has entered a new body; the only change is that it has become wealth and luxury instead of brute force and military glory. It is still selfishness and pride and atheism. At this, our first introduction to Babylon, it might have been proper to explain why throughout the Bible from Genesis to Revelation this one city should remain in fact or symbol the enemy of God and the stronghold of darkness. But we postpone what may be said of her singular reputation, till we come to the second part of the Book of Isaiah where Babylon plays a larger and more distinct role. Here her destruction is simply the most striking episode of the Divine judgement upon the whole earth. Babylon represents civilisation; she is the brow of the world's pride and enmity to God. One distinctively Babylonian characteristic, however, must not be passed over. With a ring of irony in his voice, the prophet declares, Behold, I stir up the Medes against thee, who regard not silver and take no pleasure in gold. The worst terror that can assail us is the terror of forces, whose character we cannot fathom, who will not stop to parley, who do not understand our language nor our bribes. It was such a power, with which the resourceful and luxurious Babylon was threatened. With money the Babylonians did all they wished to do, and believed everything else to be possible. They had subsidised kings, bought over enemies, seduced the peoples of the earth. The foe whom God now sent them was impervious to this influence. From their pure highlands came down upon corrupt civilisation a simple people, whose banner was a leathern apron, whose goal was not booty nor ease but power and mastery, who came not to rob but to displace.
This prophecy clearly came to a people already in captivity—a very different situation for the Church of God compared to what we’ve seen under Isaiah. But on this new stage, it’s still the same old struggle. Assyria has fallen, but Babylon has stepped in to take its place. The old spirit of cruelty and greed has taken on a new form; the only change is that it has transformed into wealth and luxury instead of brute force and military glory. It remains selfishness, pride, and disbelief in God. At this point, our first introduction to Babylon, it might have been appropriate to explain why this one city has remained, throughout the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, the enemy of God and a stronghold of darkness. However, we’ll save that discussion about her unique reputation until we reach the second part of the Book of Isaiah, where Babylon has a more significant and distinct role. Here, her destruction is simply the most striking example of Divine judgment on the whole earth. Babylon represents civilization; she embodies the peak of the world's pride and hostility towards God. One distinctly Babylonian trait must not be overlooked. With a touch of irony in his voice, the prophet declares, Behold, I stir up the Medes against thee, who regard not silver and take no pleasure in gold. The worst terror we can face is the fear of forces whose nature we cannot understand, who won’t negotiate, who don’t recognize our language or our bribes. It was this kind of power that was threatening the resourceful and luxurious Babylon. The Babylonians believed they could accomplish anything with money. They had subsidized kings, bought off enemies, and seduced the people of the earth. The enemy God sent them was immune to this influence. From their pure highlands came a simple people upon corrupt civilization, whose symbol was a leather apron, whose aim was not plunder or comfort but power and control, who came not to steal but to replace.
The lessons of the passage are two: that the[408] people of God are something distinct from civilisation, though this be universal and absorbent as a very Babylon; and that the resources of civilisation are not even in material strength the highest in the universe, but God has in His armoury weapons heedless of men's cunning, and in His armies agents impervious to men's bribes. Every civilisation needs to be told, according to its temper, one of these two things. Is it hypocritical? Then it needs to be told that civilisation is not one with the people of God. Is it arrogant? Then it needs to be told that the resources of civilisation are not the strongest forces in God's universe. Man talks of the triumph of mind over matter, of the power of culture, of the elasticity of civilisation; but God has natural forces, to which all these are as the worm beneath the hoof of the horse: and if moral need arise, He will call His brute forces into requisition. Howl ye, for the day of Jehovah is near; as destruction from the Destructive does it come. There may be periods in man's history when, in opposition to man's unholy art and godless civilisation, God can reveal Himself only as destruction.
The lessons from this passage are twofold: first, that the people of God are distinct from civilization, even though civilization can be as overwhelming and all-consuming as Babylon; and second, that the resources of civilization are not the most powerful in the universe. God has weapons in His arsenal that are beyond human cunning, and His armies have agents who cannot be bought. Every civilization needs to hear one of these messages, tailored to its nature. If it's hypocritical, it needs to recognize that civilization is not synonymous with the people of God. If it's arrogant, it needs to understand that the resources of civilization are not the strongest forces in God's universe. People talk about the triumph of intellect over matter, the influence of culture, and the adaptability of civilization; but God has natural forces that make all these seem insignificant, like a worm under a horse's hoof. If there's a moral need, He will call upon His raw forces. Howl ye, for the day of Jehovah is near; as destruction from the Destructive does it come. There may be times in human history when, in response to humanity's unholy actions and godless civilization, God can only reveal Himself as destruction.
II. The Tyrant (xiv. 3-23).
II. The Tyrant (xiv. 3-23).
To the prophecy of the overthrow of Babylon there is annexed, in order to be sung by Israel in the hour of her deliverance, a satiric ode or taunt-song (Heb. mashal, Eng. ver. parable) upon the King of Babylon. A translation of this spirited poem in the form of its verse (in which, it is to be regretted, it has not been rendered by the English revisers) will be more instructive than a full commentary. But the following remarks of introduction are necessary. The word mashal, by which this ode is entitled, means[409] comparison, similitude or parable, and was applicable to every sentence composed of at least two members that compared or contrasted their subjects. As the great bulk of Hebrew poetry is sententious, and largely depends for rhythm upon its parallelism, mashal received a general application; and while another term—shîr—more properly denotes lyric poetry, mashal is applied to rhythmical passages in the Old Testament of almost all tempers: to mere predictions, proverbs, orations, satires or taunt-songs, as here, and to didactic pieces. The parallelism of the verses in our ode is too evident to need an index. But the parallel verses are next grouped into strophes. In Hebrew poetry this division is frequently effected by the use of a refrain. In our ode there is no refrain, but the strophes are easily distinguished by difference of subject-matter. Hebrew poetry does not employ rhyme, but makes use of assonance, and to a much less extent of alliteration—a form which is more frequent in Hebrew prose. In our ode there is not much either of assonance or alliteration. But, on the other hand, the ode has but to be read to break into a certain rough and swinging rhythm. This is produced by long verses rising alternate with short ones falling. Hebrew verse at no time relied for a metrical effect upon the modern device of an equal or proportionate number of syllables. The longer verses of this ode are sometimes too short, the shorter too long, variations to which a rude chant could readily adapt itself. But the alternation of long and short is sustained throughout, except for a break at ver. 10 by the introduction of the formula And they answered and said, which evidently ought to stand for a long and a short verse if the number of double verses in the second strophe is to be the same as it is—seven—in the first and in the third.
To the prophecy about the fall of Babylon, there's a satirical poem or taunt-song (Heb. mashal, Eng. ver. parable) for Israel to sing during her time of deliverance, directed at the King of Babylon. A translation of this lively poem in verse form (which, unfortunately, the English revisers didn't provide) will be more enlightening than a full commentary. However, a few introductory remarks are needed. The term mashal that titles this poem means[409] comparison, similarity, or parable, and applies to any sentence made up of at least two parts that compare or contrast their subjects. Since much of Hebrew poetry relies on concise statements and has a rhythm that depends on parallelism, mashal has a broad application. While another word—shîr—more accurately refers to lyric poetry, mashal is used for rhythmic sections in the Old Testament that span various moods: including predictions, proverbs, speeches, satires or taunt-songs like this one, and teaching pieces. The parallel structure of the verses in our poem is too clear to need further explanation. However, these parallel verses are organized into strophes. In Hebrew poetry, this division often uses a refrain. In our poem, there isn't a refrain, but the strophes are easily identified by their different subjects. Hebrew poetry doesn’t use rhyme but relies on assonance and, to a lesser extent, alliteration—a feature more common in Hebrew prose. Our poem has little assonance or alliteration, but when read aloud, it naturally falls into a rough and flowing rhythm. This is created by alternating long lines with shorter ones. Hebrew verse never depended on the modern concept of having an equal or proportionate number of syllables for a rhythmic effect. The longer lines in this poem are sometimes too short, and the shorter ones too long, making them adaptable to a simple chant. Nevertheless, the pattern of alternating long and short lines is consistent throughout, except for a break at verse 10 with the phrase And they answered and said, which seems to function as a long and short line to maintain the same number of double verses—seven—in the second strophe as in the first and third.
[410]The scene of the poem, the Underworld and abode of the shades of the dead, is one on which some of the most splendid imagination and music of humanity has been expended. But we must not be disappointed if we do not here find the rich detail and glowing fancy of Virgil's or of Dante's vision. This simple and even rude piece of metre, liker ballad than epic, ought to excite our wonder not so much for what it has failed to imagine as for what, being at its disposal, it has resolutely stinted itself in employing. For it is evident that the author of these lines had within his reach the rich, fantastic materials of Semitic mythology, which are familiar to us in the Babylonian remains. With an austerity, that must strike every one who is acquainted with these, he uses only so much of them as to enable him to render with dramatic force his simple theme—the vanity of human arrogance.[75]
[410]The setting of the poem, the Underworld and home of the spirits of the dead, has inspired some of humanity's most amazing imagination and music. However, we shouldn’t be let down if we don’t encounter the elaborate detail and vibrant imagery found in Virgil's or Dante's visions. This straightforward and somewhat rough piece of verse, more like a ballad than an epic, should amaze us not so much for what it fails to depict but for what it intentionally refrains from using despite having access to it. It’s clear that the author of these lines had at his disposal the rich and imaginative elements of Semitic mythology that we recognize from Babylonian artifacts. With a seriousness that anyone familiar with these stories would notice, he uses just enough of them to powerfully convey his simple message—the futility of human pride.[75]
For this purpose he employs the idea of the Underworld which was prevalent among the northern Semitic peoples. Sheol—the gaping or craving place—which we shall have occasion to describe in detail when we come to speak of belief in the resurrection,[76] is the state after death that craves and swallows all living. There dwell the shades of men amid some unsubstantial reflection of their earthly state (ver. 9), and with consciousness and passion only sufficient to greet the[411] arrival of the new-comer and express satiric wonder at his fall (ver. 9). With the arrogance of the Babylonian kings, this tyrant thought to scale the heavens to set his throne in the mount of assembly of the immortals, to match the Most High.[77] But his fate is the fate of all mortals—to go down to the weakness and emptiness of Sheol. Here, let us carefully observe, there is no trace of a judgement for reward or punishment. The new victim of death simply passes to his place among his equals. There was enough of contrast between the arrogance of a tyrant claiming Divinity and his fall into the common receptacle of mortality to point the prophet's moral without the addition of infernal torment. Do we wish to know the actual punishment of his pride and cruelty? It is visible above ground (strophe 4); not with his spirit, but with his corpse; not with himself, but with his wretched family. His corpse is unburied, his family exterminated; his name disappears from the earth.[78]
For this purpose, he uses the concept of the Underworld that was common among the northern Semitic peoples. Sheol—the gaping or craving place—which we will describe in detail when we discuss beliefs about resurrection,[76] is the state after death that longs for and consumes all the living. The shades of men dwell there, amidst some vague reflection of their earthly lives (ver. 9), possessing just enough consciousness and emotion to greet a new arrival and express ironic amazement at his downfall (ver. 9). With the pride of the Babylonian kings, this tyrant thought he could reach the heavens to place his throne in the mount of assembly of the immortals, to match the Most High.[77] But his fate is the same as all mortals—to descend into Sheol, which is weak and empty. Here, it's important to note, there is no sign of judgment for reward or punishment. The latest victim of death simply moves to his spot among his peers. The contrast between the arrogance of a tyrant claiming divinity and his fall into a common grave of mortality is enough to convey the prophet's message without needing to add any hellish torment. Do we want to know the true consequence of his pride and cruelty? It’s visible above ground (strophe 4); not with his spirit, but with his lifeless body; not with him, but with his miserable family. His body lies unburied, his family wiped out; his name vanishes from the earth.[78]
Thus, by the help of only a few fragments from the popular mythology, the sacred satirist achieves his[412] purpose. His severe monotheism is remarkable in its contrast to Babylonian poems upon similar subjects. He will know none of the gods of the underworld. In place of the great goddess, whom a Babylonian would certainly have seen presiding, with her minions, over the shades, he personifies—it is a frequent figure of Hebrew poetry—the abyss itself. Sheol shuddereth at thee. It is the same when he speaks (ver. 13) of the deep's great opposite, that mount of assembly of the gods, which the northern Semites believed to soar to a silver sky in the recesses of the north (ver. 14), upon the great range which in that direction bounded the Babylonian plain. This Hebrew knows of no gods there but One, whose are the stars, who is the Most High. Man's arrogance and cruelty are attempts upon His majesty. He inevitably overwhelms them. Death is their penalty: blood and squalor on earth, the concourse of shuddering ghosts below.
So, with just a few fragments from popular mythology, the sacred satirist achieves his[412] goal. His strict monotheism stands out sharply compared to Babylonian poems on similar themes. He recognizes none of the gods of the underworld. Instead of seeing the great goddess, who a Babylonian would surely have pictured presiding over the spirits with her followers, he represents—the common figure in Hebrew poetry—the abyss itself. Sheol trembles at you. The same applies when he refers (ver. 13) to the deep's great opposite, that mount of assembly of the gods, which northern Semites believed reached up to a silver sky in the hidden north (ver. 14), on the great mountain range that marked the edge of the Babylonian plain. This Hebrew knows of no gods there but One, who owns the stars and is the Most High. Human arrogance and cruelty challenge His majesty. He always overpowers them. Death is their punishment: blood and filth on earth, the gathering of shuddering spirits below.
And the rulers gather for advice,
Against the Lord and against His Chosen One.
The one who sits in the heavens will laugh;
The Lord will mock them.
The only other remarks necessary are these. In ver. 9 the Authorized Version has not attempted to reproduce the humour of the original satire, which styles them that were chief men on earth chief-goats of the herd, bell-wethers. The phrase they that go down to the stones of the pit should be transferred from ver. 19 to ver. 20.
The only other comments needed are these. In ver. 9, the Authorized Version hasn't tried to convey the humor of the original satire, which calls them the main leaders on earth chief-goats of the herd, bell-wethers. The phrase they that go down to the stones of the pit should be moved from ver. 19 to ver. 20.
And thou shalt lift up this proverb upon the King of Babylon, and shalt say,—
And you will use this proverb about the King of Babylon, and say,—
And the fury is calmed!
The Lord has shattered the power of the wicked,
Scepter of tyrants:
The people's passion strikes hard,
Consistent stroke,
Treading in wrath (the) nations,
Endless trampling.
The entire earth is peaceful and still,
They start singing;
Even the pines are celebrating for you,
Lebanon's cedar trees!
"Since you lie low, don’t come up."
"Guy against us."
To greet your arrival,
[414]Summoning the shadows for you,
All great goats of the earth!
Rises upright from their thrones
All kings of nations.
10. All of them answer and say to thee,—
10. They all respond and say to you,—
You've been targeted!
Cast into Sheol is your pride,
The sound of your harps;
Beneath you are the maggots.
"Your blanket is infested."
III.
Morning Star, son of dawn
How have you been brought down to earth,
Hurting nations.
And you, you said in your heart,
"I will reach the heavens,"
Way up to the stars of God
Raise my throne high,
And sit on the mountain of gathering,
Far north,
I will rise to the heights of the cloud,
"I will equal the Most High!"
Ah! you are thrown into Sheol,
Stay far back from the pit!
IV.
They ponder on you:
Is this the man who shook the world,
Game changer?[415]
Setting the world like a desert,
He destroyed its cities;
He did not release his prisoners.
(Each of them) heading home.
All kings of nations, yes all,
Are lying in their place;
But you! You are thrown from your grave,
Like a disgusting stick.
Covered with the slain, those pierced by the sword,
Like a body that is stepped on.
Those who go down to the stones of a crypt,
You shall not be with them in burial.
For the land you have destroyed,
Your people have slaughtered.
Will not be mentioned forever
Wicked seed!
Create a mess for his kids,
For the sins of their fathers!
They will not rise or inherit the earth,
Nor cover the earth with cities.
V.
Says the Lord of hosts;
And I will cut off from Babel
Record and leftover,
And offspring and seed,
Says the Lord:
Yes, I will make it the bittern's legacy,
Wetlands!
And I will clear it away with waves of destruction,
Says the Lord of hosts.
CHAPTER XXVIII.
THE EFFECT OF SIN ON OUR MATERIAL CIRCUMSTANCE.
Isaiah xxiv. (DATE UNCERTAIN).
Isaiah xxiv. (DATE UNCERTAIN).
The twenty-fourth of Isaiah is one of those chapters, which almost convince the most persevering reader of Scripture that a consecutive reading of the Authorized Version is an impossibility. For what does he get from it but a weary and unintelligent impression of destruction, from which he gladly escapes to the nearest clear utterance of gospel or judgement? Criticism affords little help. It cannot clearly identify the chapter with any historical situation. For a moment there is a gleam of a company standing outside the convulsion, and to the west of the prophet, while the prophet himself suffers captivity.[80] But even this fades before we make it out; and all the rest of the chapter has too universal an application—the language is too imaginative, enigmatic and even paradoxical—to be applied to an actual historical situation, or to its[417] development in the immediate future. This is an ideal description, the apocalyptic vision of a last, great day of judgement upon the whole world; and perhaps the moral truths are all the more impressive that the reader is not distracted by temporary or local references.
The twenty-fourth chapter of Isaiah is one of those sections that almost convinces even the most dedicated reader of Scripture that reading the Authorized Version straight through is impossible. What do they get from it but a tiring and confusing impression of destruction, from which they quickly escape to the nearest clear statement of gospel or judgment? Criticism offers little clarity. It can’t clearly link the chapter to any specific historical event. For a moment, there seems to be a glimpse of a group standing outside the turmoil, west of the prophet, while the prophet himself is in captivity. But even that quickly fades before we can fully grasp it; and the rest of the chapter has such a universal application—the language is too imaginative, enigmatic, and even paradoxical—to be tied to a specific historical context or its development in the near future. This is an ideal description, the apocalyptic vision of a final, significant day of judgment for the entire world; and perhaps the moral truths are even more impactful since the reader isn’t distracted by temporary or local references.
With the very first verse the prophecy leaps far beyond all particular or national conditions: Behold, Jehovah shall be emptying the earth and rifling it; and He shall turn it upside down and scatter its inhabitants. This is expressive and thorough; the words are those which were used for cleaning a dirty dish. To the completeness of this opening verse there is really nothing in the chapter to add. All the rest of the verses only illustrate this upturning and scouring of the material universe. For it is with the material universe that the chapter is concerned. Nothing is said of the spiritual nature of man—little, indeed, about man at all. He is simply called the inhabitant of the earth, and the structure of society (ver. 2) is introduced only to make more complete the effect of the convulsion of the earth itself. Man cannot escape those judgements which shatter his material habitation. It is like one of Dante's visions. Terror, and Pit and Snare upon thee, O inhabitant of the earth! And it shall come to pass that he who fleeth from the noise of the Terror shall fall into the Pit, and he who cometh up out of the midst of the Pit shall be taken in the Snare. For the windows on high are opened, and the foundations of the earth do shake. Broken, utterly broken, is the earth; shattered, utterly shattered, the earth; staggering, very staggering, the earth; reeling, the earth reeleth like a drunken man: she swingeth to and fro like a hammock. And so through the rest of the chapter it is the material life of man that is cursed: the new wine, [418]the vine, the tabrets, the harp, the song, and the merriness in men's hearts which these call forth. Nor does the chapter confine itself to the earth. The closing verses carry the effect of judgement to the heavens and far limits of the material universe. The host of the high ones on high (ver. 21) are not spiritual beings, the angels. They are material bodies, the stars. Then, too, shall the moon be confounded, and the stars ashamed, when the Lord's kingdom is established and His righteousness made gloriously clear.
With the very first verse, the prophecy goes way beyond specific or national circumstances: Look, Jehovah will empty the earth and shake it up; He will turn it upside down and scatter its inhabitants. This is vivid and complete; the words used are the same as those for cleaning a dirty dish. There’s really nothing else to add to this opening verse. All the other verses just illustrate this upheaval and cleaning of the material universe. The chapter is focused on the physical world. It doesn’t say much about the spiritual side of humanity—little about humans at all. They are simply referred to as the inhabitants of the earth, and the structure of society (ver. 2) is mentioned only to enhance the impact of the earth’s turmoil itself. People cannot escape the judgments that disrupt their physical homes. It’s similar to one of Dante's visions. Terror, and Pit and Snare upon you, O inhabitant of the earth! And it will happen that whoever flees from the noise of Terror will fall into the Pit, and whoever comes up out of the Pit will be caught in the Snare. For the windows above are opened, and the foundations of the earth shake. Broken, completely broken, is the earth; shattered, completely shattered, the earth; staggering, very staggering, the earth; reeling, the earth reels like a drunk: she sways back and forth like a hammock. And so throughout the rest of the chapter, it is humanity's material life that is cursed: the new wine, [418]the vine, the drums, the harp, the song, and the joy in people's hearts that these bring. The chapter also extends beyond the earth. The closing verses carry the impact of judgment to the heavens and the far reaches of the material universe. The host of the high ones on high (ver. 21) are not spiritual beings, like angels. They are physical bodies, the stars. Then, too, the moon will be ashamed, and the stars humiliated, when the Lord's kingdom is established and His righteousness shines brilliantly.
What awful truth is this for illustration of which we see not man, but his habitation, the world and all its surroundings, lifted up by the hand of the Lord, broken open, wiped out and shaken, while man himself, as if only to heighten the effect, staggers hopelessly like some broken insect on the quaking ruins? What judgement is this, in which not only one city or one kingdom is concerned, as in the last prophecy of which we treated, but the whole earth is convulsed, and moon and sun confounded?
What a terrible truth this is, illustrated not by man himself, but by his home—the world and all its surroundings—uplifted by the hand of the Lord, shattered, erased, and shaken. Meanwhile, man, as if to amplify the effect, stumbles around hopelessly like a broken insect amidst the trembling ruins. What kind of judgment is this, where not just one city or one kingdom is affected, as in the last prophecy we discussed, but the entire earth is shaken, along with the moon and sun in chaos?
The judgement is the visitation of man's sins on his material surroundings—The earth's transgression shall be heavy upon it; and it shall rise, and not fall. The truth on which this judgement rests is that between man and his material circumstance—the earth he inhabits, the seasons which bear him company through time and the stars to which he looks high up in heaven—there is a moral sympathy. The earth also is profaned under the inhabitants thereof, because they have transgressed the laws, changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant.
The judgment reflects how people's sins impact their physical surroundings—The earth's wrongdoing will weigh heavily upon it; and it will rise, and not fall. The truth behind this judgment is that there’s a moral connection between humans and their environment—the land they live on, the seasons that accompany them through life, and the stars they gaze up at in the sky. The earth is also corrupted because of its inhabitants, who have violated the laws, altered the decree, and broken the eternal covenant.
The Bible gives no support to the theory that matter itself is evil. God created all things; and God saw everything that He had made; and, behold, it was very good.[419] When, therefore, we read in the Bible that the earth is cursed, we read that it is cursed for man's sake; when we read of its desolation, it is as the effect of man's crime. The Flood, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, the plagues of Egypt and other great physical catastrophes happened because men were stubborn or men were foul. We cannot help noticing, however, that matter was thus convulsed or destroyed, not only for the purpose of punishing the moral agent, but because of some poison which had passed from him into the unconscious instruments, stage and circumstance of his crime. According to the Bible, there would appear to be some mysterious sympathy between man and Nature. Man not only governs Nature; he infects and informs her. As the moral life of the soul expresses itself in the physical life of the body for the latter's health or corruption, so the conduct of the human race affects the physical life of the universe to its farthest limits in space. When man is reconciled to God, the wilderness blossoms like a rose; but the guilt of man sullies, infects and corrupts the place he inhabits and the articles he employs; and their destruction becomes necessary, not for his punishment so much as because of the infection and pollution that is in them.
The Bible does not support the idea that matter itself is evil. God created everything; and God saw everything that He had made; and, behold, it was very good.[419] When we read in the Bible that the earth is cursed, it’s cursed for humanity’s sake; when we read about its desolation, it’s a result of human wrongdoing. The Flood, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, the plagues of Egypt, and other major disasters happened because people were stubborn or immoral. However, it’s clear that matter was disturbed or destroyed not just to punish moral agents, but because some kind of poison from them affected the unconscious tools, settings, and situations of their wrongdoings. According to the Bible, there seems to be a mysterious connection between humanity and Nature. Humans don’t just govern Nature; they also affect it. Just as the moral state of the soul reflects in the physical condition of the body, for better or worse, the behavior of humanity impacts the physical state of the universe to its farthest reaches. When humanity is reconciled with God, the wilderness blooms like a rose; but human guilt taints, infects, and corrupts the places we inhabit and the things we use, making their destruction necessary, not just as punishment, but because of the infection and pollution present in them.
The Old Testament is not contented with a general statement of this great principle, but pursues it to all sorts of particular and private applications. The curses of the Lord fell, not only on the sinner, but on his dwelling, on his property and even on the bit of ground these occupied. This was especially the case with regard to idolatry. When Israel put a pagan population to the sword, they were commanded to raze the city, gather its wealth together, burn all that was burnable and put the rest into the temple of the Lord as a thing devoted[420] or accursed, which it would harm themselves to share (Deut. vii. 25, 26; xiii. 7). The very site of Jericho was cursed, and men were forbidden to build upon its horrid waste. The story of Achan illustrates the same principle.
The Old Testament doesn’t just make a broad statement about this important principle; it also dives into various specific and personal applications. The curses from the Lord affected not just the sinner, but also their home, their belongings, and even the land they occupied. This was especially true when it came to idolatry. When Israel defeated a pagan population, they were instructed to destroy the city, collect its wealth, burn everything that could be burned, and bring what was left to the temple of the Lord as something devoted[420] or cursed, which would be harmful to them if they shared it (Deut. vii. 25, 26; xiii. 7). The very site of Jericho was cursed, and people were forbidden to rebuild on its terrible ruins. The story of Achan exemplifies this same principle.
It is just this principle which chap. xxiv. extends to the whole universe. What happened in Jericho because of its inhabitants' idolatry is now to happen to the whole earth because of man's sin. The earth also is profane under her inhabitants, because they have transgressed the laws, changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant. In these words the prophet takes us away back to the covenant with Noah, which he properly emphasizes as a covenant with all mankind. With a noble universalism, for which his race and their literature get too little credit, this Hebrew recognises that once all mankind were holy unto God, who had included them under His grace, that promised the fixedness and fertility of nature. But that covenant, though of grace, had its conditions for man. These had been broken. The race had grown wicked, as it was before the Flood; and therefore, in terms which vividly recall that former judgement of God—the windows on high are opened—the prophet foretells a new and more awful catastrophe. One word which he employs betrays how close he feels the moral sympathy to be between man and his world. The earth, he says, is profane. This is a word, whose root meaning is that which has fallen away or separated itself, which is delinquent. Sometimes, perhaps, it has a purely moral significance, like our word "abandoned" in the common acceptance: he who has fallen far and utterly into sin, the reckless sinner. But mostly it has rather the religious meaning of one who has fallen out of the covenant relation with God and[421] the relevant benefits and privileges. Into this covenant not only Israel and their land, but humanity and the whole world, have been brought. Is man under covenant grace? The world is also. Does man fall? So does the world, becoming with him profane. The consequence of breaking the covenant oath was expressed in Hebrew by a technical word; and it is this word which, translated curse, is applied in ver. 6 to the earth.
It’s this principle that chapter 24 expands to the entire universe. What happened in Jericho due to its people’s idolatry is now set to happen to the whole earth because of humanity’s sin. The earth is also corrupted because of its inhabitants, who have violated the laws, altered the decrees, and broken the everlasting covenant. Here, the prophet references the covenant with Noah, emphasizing it as a covenant with all of humanity. With a noble sense of universalism, for which his people and their literature receive too little credit, this Hebrew acknowledges that once all humanity was sacred to God, who had encompassed them under His grace, promising stability and fertility in nature. However, this covenant, despite being one of grace, had conditions for humanity. These conditions had been violated. Humanity had become wicked, just as it was before the Flood; therefore, in phrases that strongly remind one of that previous judgment of God—the windows on high are opened—the prophet predicts a new and even more terrifying disaster. One word he uses reveals how closely he feels the moral connection between humans and their world. The earth, he says, is profane. This term, whose root meaning is that which has fallen away or separated itself, relates to delinquency. Sometimes, it carries a purely moral significance, similar to our word "abandoned" in its common use: one who has fallen deeply into sin, the reckless sinner. But most of the time, it bears the religious meaning of someone who has fallen out of the covenant relationship with God and the associated benefits and privileges. This covenant includes not just Israel and their land, but all of humanity and the entire world. Is humanity under covenant grace? So is the world. Does humanity fall? So does the world, becoming profane alongside it. The consequence of breaking the covenant oath is expressed in Hebrew by a specific term; this term, translated as curse, is applied in verse 6 to the earth.
The whole earth is to be broken up and dissolved. What then is to become of the people of God—the indestructible remnant? Where are they to settle? In this new deluge is there a new ark? For answer the prophet presents us with an old paradise (ver. 23). He has wrecked the universe; but he says now, Jehovah of hosts shall dwell in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem. It would be impossible to find a better instance of the limitations of Old Testament prophecy than this return to the old dispensation after the old dispensation has been committed to the flames. At such a crisis as the conflagration of the universe for the sin of man, the hope of the New Testament looks for the creation of a new heaven and a new earth, but there is no scintilla of such a hope in this prediction. The imagination of the Hebrew seer is beaten back upon the theatre his conscience has abandoned. He knows "the old is out of date," but for him "the new is not yet born;" and, therefore, convinced as he is that the old must pass away, he is forced to borrow from its ruins a provisional abode for God's people, a figure for the truth which grips him so firmly, that, in spite of the death of all the universe for man's sin, there must be a visibleness and locality of the Divine majesty, a place where the people of God may gather to bless His holy name.
The whole earth is going to be torn apart and destroyed. What will happen to the people of God—the unbreakable remnant? Where will they settle? In this new flood, is there a new ark? To answer this, the prophet gives us an old paradise (ver. 23). He has shattered the universe; yet he says, Jehovah of hosts shall dwell in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem. It's hard to find a better example of the limits of Old Testament prophecy than this return to the old covenant after it has been set ablaze. At a moment like the universe’s destruction due to human sin, the hope of the New Testament looks for the creation of a new heaven and a new earth, but there’s no hint of such hope in this prediction. The imagination of the Hebrew seer is pushed back against the stage his conscience has left behind. He knows "the old is outdated," but for him "the new has not yet been born;" and so, even though he’s sure the old must go, he has to take from its ruins a temporary home for God's people, a symbol of the truth that grips him so strongly that, despite the destruction of the entire universe because of human sin, there must be a visible presence and place of Divine majesty, somewhere for the people of God to gather and praise His holy name.
[422]In this contrast of the power of spiritual imagination possessed respectively by the Old and New Testaments we must not, however, lose the ethical interest which the main lesson of this chapter has for the individual conscience. A breaking universe, the great day of judgement, may be too large and too far off to impress our conscience. But each of us has his own world—body, property and environment—which is as much and as evidently affected by his own sins as our chapter represents the universe to be by the sins of the race.
[422]In contrasting the power of spiritual imagination found in the Old and New Testaments, we shouldn't overlook the ethical significance that the main lesson of this chapter holds for individual conscience. A chaotic universe and the impending day of judgment might seem too vast and distant to impact our conscience. However, each of us has our own world—our body, our possessions, and our surroundings—which is just as clearly influenced by our own wrongdoings as our chapter illustrates the universe is affected by the sins of humanity.
To grant that the moral and physical universes are from the same hand is to affirm a sympathy and mutual reaction between them. This affirmation is confirmed by experience, and this experience is of two kinds. To the guilty man Nature seems aware, and flashes back from her larger surfaces the magnified reflection of his own self-contempt and terror. But, besides, men are also unable to escape attributing to the material instruments or surroundings of their sin a certain infection, a certain power of recommunicating to their imaginations and memories the desire for sin, as well as of inflicting upon them the pain and penalty of the disorder it has produced among themselves. Sin, though born, as Christ said, in the heart, has immediately a material expression; and we may follow this outwards through man's mind, body and estate, not only to find it "hindering, disturbing, complicating all," but reinfecting with the lust and odour of sin the will which gave it birth. As sin is put forth by the will, or is cherished in the heart, so we find error cloud the mind, impurity the imagination, misery the feelings, and pain and weariness infect the flesh and bone. God, who modelled it, alone knows how far man's physical form has been degraded by the sinful thoughts[423] and habits of which for ages it has been the tool and expression; but even our eyes may sometimes trace the despoiler, and that not only in the case of what are preferably named sins of the flesh, but even with lusts that do not require for their gratification the abuse of the body. Pride, as one might think the least fleshly of all the vices, leaves yet in time her damning signature, and will mark the strongest faces with the sad symptoms of that mental break-down, for which unrestrained pride is so often to blame. If sin thus disfigures the body, we know that sin also infects the body. The habituated flesh becomes the suggester of crime to the will which first constrained it to sin, and now wearily, but in vain, rebels against the habits of its instrument. But we recall all this about the body only to say that what is true of the body is true of the soul's greater material surroundings. With the sentence Thou shalt surely die, God connects this other: Cursed is the ground for thy sake.
To say that the moral and physical worlds come from the same source is to acknowledge a connection and interaction between them. This idea is supported by experience, which comes in two forms. For the guilty person, nature seems to be aware and reflects back their self-hatred and fear. Additionally, people also tend to attribute a kind of harmful influence to the physical things around their wrongdoing, linking them to a haunting desire for sin and the pain and consequences it has caused them. Sin, although it starts in the heart, quickly finds a physical expression; we can trace this outward through a person's mind, body, and circumstances, where it not only "hinders, disturbs, complicates everything," but also reinfects the will that allowed it to exist. As the will gives rise to sin or nurtures it in the heart, we see how it clouds the mind with confusion, sullies the imagination, brings misery to emotions, and creates physical pain and exhaustion in the body. Only God, who designed us, truly understands how much humanity's physical state has been degraded by the sinful thoughts and behaviors it has expressed for ages; yet, even we can sometimes see the marks left by sin, not only in what we typically consider bodily sins but also in desires that don't require physical acts to satisfy. Pride, often seen as the least physical of all vices, still leaves behind its devastating marks over time, displaying its effects on even the strongest faces through the troubling signs of the mental breakdown that unchecked pride can cause. If sin disfigures the body, we know it also infects it. The body that has been accustomed to sin becomes a source of temptation for the will that first forced it into wrongdoing, and now it struggles, weary yet helpless, against the habits of its own actions. But we mention all of this about the body to express that what is true for the body is also true for the broader material environment of the soul. With the declaration, Thou shalt surely die, God ties in another: Cursed is the ground for thy sake.
When we pass from a man's body, the wrapping we find next nearest to his soul is his property. It has always been an instinct of the race, that there is nothing a man may so infect with the sin of his heart as his handiwork and the gains of his toil. And that is a true instinct, for, in the first place, the making of property perpetuates a man's own habits. If he is successful in business, then every bit of wealth he gathers is a confirmation of the motives and tempers in which he conducted his business. A man deceives himself as to this, saying, Wait till I have made enough; then I will put away the meanness, the harshness and the dishonesty with which I made it. He shall not be able. Just because he has been successful, he will continue in his habit without thinking; just because there has been[424] no break-down to convict of folly and suggest penitence, so he becomes hardened. Property is a bridge on which our passions cross from one part of our life to another. The Germans have an ironical proverb: "The man who has stolen a hundred thousand dollars can afford to live honestly." The emphasis of the irony falls on the words in italics: he can afford, but never does. His property hardens his heart, and keeps him from repentance.
When we move beyond a person’s physical presence, the next thing closest to their soul is their possessions. It's always been human nature that nothing can taint a person as much as the things they create and the wealth they accumulate. This instinct is accurate because, first, the creation of wealth reflects a person's own habits. If someone succeeds in business, every dollar they earn confirms the motives and attitudes they used to achieve that success. A person might fool themselves into thinking, "Once I have enough, I'll set aside the greed, harshness, and dishonesty that got me here." But that won’t happen. Because of their success, they'll continue their habits without realizing it; since there hasn’t been any failure to highlight their foolishness and prompt remorse, they become calloused. Possessions act as a pathway over which our emotions travel from one part of our lives to another. There's a German saying that goes, "The man who has stolen a hundred thousand dollars can afford to live honestly." The irony lies in the emphasis on "can afford"; he can, but he never does. His wealth hardens his heart and prevents him from feeling remorse.
But the instinct of humanity has also been quick to this: that the curse of ill-gotten wealth passes like bad blood from father to child. What is the truth in this matter? A glance at history will tell us. The accumulation of property is the result of certain customs, habits and laws. In its own powerful interest property perpetuates these down the ages, and infects the fresh air of each new generation with their temper. How often in the history of mankind has it been property gained under unjust laws or cruel monopolies which has prevented the abolition of these, and carried into gentler, freer times the pride and exclusiveness of the age, by whose rude habits it was gathered. This moral transference, which we see on so large a scale in public history, is repeated to some extent in every private bequest. A curse does not necessarily follow an estate from the sinful producer of it to his heir; but the latter is, by the bequest itself generally brought into so close a contact with his predecessor as to share his conscience and be in sympathy with his temper. And the case is common where an heir, though absolutely up to the date of his succession separate from him who made and has left the property, nevertheless finds himself unable to alter the methods, or to escape the temper, in which the property has been managed. In nine cases out of ten property carries[425] conscience and transfers habit; if the guilt does not descend, the infection does.
But humanity's instinct has quickly recognized this: that the curse of ill-gotten wealth is passed down from parent to child. What’s the truth here? A look at history reveals it. The accumulation of property comes from certain customs, habits, and laws. In its own interest, property maintains these traditions over time, affecting each new generation with their mindset. How often in human history has property obtained through unfair laws or harsh monopolies hindered the end of these practices, carrying into more compassionate, freer times the pride and exclusiveness of the era during which it was acquired? This moral transfer we observe on a large scale in public history is also reflected, to some degree, in every private inheritance. A curse doesn’t always follow an estate from the wrongdoer who created it to their heir; however, the heir is often, by the inheritance itself, brought into such close contact with their predecessor that they share in their conscience and align with their mindset. It’s common for an heir, even though they are entirely separate from the person who created the property at the time they inherit it, to find themselves unable to change the methods or escape the mentality under which the property has been managed. In nine out of ten cases, property carries[425] conscience and transfers habit; if the guilt doesn’t pass down, the influence does.
When we pass from the effect of sin upon property to its effect upon circumstance, we pass to what we can affirm with even greater conscience. Man has the power of permanently soaking and staining his surroundings with the effect of sins in themselves momentary and transient. Sin increases terribly by the mental law of association. It is not the gin-shop and the face of wanton beauty that alone tempt men to sin. Far more subtle seductions are about every one of us. That we have the power of inflicting our character upon the scenes of our conduct is proved by some of the dreariest experiences of life. A failure in duty renders the place of it distasteful and enervating. Are we irritable and selfish at home? Then home is certain to be depressing, and little helpful to our spiritual growth. Are we selfish and niggardly in the interest we take in others? Then the congregation we go to, the suburb we dwell in, will appear insipid and unprofitable; we shall be past the possibility of gaining character or happiness from the ground where God planted us and meant us to grow. Students have been idle in their studies till every time they enter them a reflex languor comes down like stale smoke, and the room they desecrated takes its revenge on them. We have it in our power to make our workshops, our laboratories and our studies places of magnificent inspiration, to enter which is to receive a baptism of industry and hope; and we have power to make it impossible ever to work in them again at full pitch. The pulpit, the pew, the very communion-table, come under this law. If a minister of God have made up his mind to say nothing from his accustomed[426] place, which has not cost him toil, to feel nothing but a dependence on God and a desire for souls, then he will never set foot there but the power of the Lord shall be upon him. But there are men who would rather set foot anywhere than in their pulpit—men who out of it are full of fellowship, information, and infective health, but there they are paralysed with the curse of their idle past. How history shows us that the most sacred shelters and institutions of man become tainted with sin, and are destroyed in revolution or abandoned to decay by the intolerant conscience of younger generations! How the hidden life of each man feels his past sins possessing his home and hearth, his pew, and even his place at the Sacrament, till it is sometimes better for his soul's health to avoid these!
When we shift our focus from how sin affects property to how it impacts our circumstances, we delve into something we can confidently recognize. People have the ability to permanently stain and alter their surroundings with the effects of sins that are actually brief and fleeting. Sin escalates significantly due to the mental law of association. It's not just the bar and the allure of temptation that draw people into wrongdoing. Much more subtle temptations exist all around us. The fact that we can impose our character onto the environments where we act is evidenced by some of life's most dismal experiences. Failing to fulfill our responsibilities makes the space where we failed feel unpleasant and draining. Are we irritable and selfish at home? Then home is likely to feel oppressive and not supportive of our spiritual growth. Are we selfish and stingy in our concern for others? Then the church we attend or the neighborhood we live in will feel dull and unrewarding; we will lose the chance to develop character or find happiness where God has placed us to flourish. Students who have been lazy in their studies eventually find that every time they enter, a sense of fatigue descends like stale smoke, and the space they mistreated takes its toll on them. We have the ability to transform our workrooms, labs, and study spaces into places of incredible inspiration, where stepping inside offers a fresh wave of motivation and hope; and we also have the power to ensure we can never work there again at full capacity. The pulpit, the pew, and even the communion table are subject to this principle. If a minister has committed to saying nothing from his usual spot that hasn’t required effort, and to feeling only a reliance on God and a passion for souls, then every time he steps there, the power of the Lord will be with him. But some people would rather be anywhere else than in their pulpit—individuals who are full of camaraderie, knowledge, and vibrant energy outside of it, yet in that space, they are hindered by the burden of their past idleness. History shows us how even the most sacred spaces and institutions can become tainted by sin and can either be dismantled in upheaval or left to decay by the unforgiving conscience of newer generations! How the hidden struggles of each person sense their past transgressions occupying their home, their pew, and even their seat at the Sacrament, to the point where it may sometimes be better for the health of their soul to avoid these places altogether!
Such considerations give a great moral force to the doctrine of the Old Testament that man's sin has rendered necessary the destruction of his material circumstances, and that the Divine judgement includes a broken and a rifled universe.
Such thoughts add significant moral weight to the Old Testament teaching that humanity's sin has made the destruction of their material world necessary, and that Divine judgment encompasses a broken and violated universe.
The New Testament has borrowed this vision from the Old, but added, as we have seen, with greater distinctness, the hope of new heavens and a new earth. We have not concluded the subject, however, when we have pointed this out, for the New Testament has another gospel. The grace of God affects even the material results of sin; the Divine pardon that converts the sinner converts his circumstance also; Christ Jesus sanctifies even the flesh, and is the Physician of the body as well as the Saviour of the soul. To Him physical evil abounds only that He may show forth His glory in curing it. Neither did this man sin nor his parents, but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.[427] To Paul the whole creation groaneth and travaileth with the sinner till now, the hour of the sinner's redemption. The Gospel bestows an evangelic liberty which permits the strong Christian to partake of meats offered to idols. And, finally, all things work together for good to them that love God, for although to the converted and forgiven sinner the material pains which his sins have brought on him may continue into his new life, they are experienced by him no more as the just penalties of an angry God, but as the loving, sanctifying chastisements of his Father in heaven.
The New Testament has taken this vision from the Old Testament but has added, as we've seen, a clearer hope for new heavens and a new earth. However, we haven't completed the discussion just by noting this, because the New Testament offers another message. God’s grace even impacts the physical consequences of sin; the Divine forgiveness that changes the sinner also transforms their circumstances; Christ Jesus sanctifies the body and is the Healer of the body as well as the Savior of the soul. Physical suffering exists only so that He can reveal His glory through healing it. Neither did this man sin nor his parents, but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.[427] To Paul, the whole creation groans and suffers with the sinner till now, waiting for the sinner's redemption. The Gospel offers a liberating grace that allows strong Christians to eat foods offered to idols. Lastly, all things work together for good to them that love God, for although the converted and forgiven sinner may still face the physical pains caused by their sins in their new life, they no longer see them as the deserved punishments of an angry God, but as the loving, purifying discipline from their Father in heaven.
CHAPTER XXIX.
GOD'S POOR.
Isaiah xxv.-xxvii. (DATE UNCERTAIN).
Isaiah 25-27. (DATE UNCERTAIN).
We have seen that no more than the faintest gleam of historical reflection brightens the obscurity of chap. xxiv., and that the disaster which lowers there is upon too world-wide a scale to be forced within the conditions of any single period in the fortunes of Israel. In chaps. xxv.-xxvii., which may naturally be held to be a continuation of chap. xxiv., the historical allusions are more numerous. Indeed, it might be said they are too numerous, for they contradict one another to the perplexity of the most acute critics. They imply historical circumstances for the prophecy both before and after the exile. On the one hand, the blame of idolatry in Judah (xxvii. 9), the mention of Assyria and Egypt (xxvii. 12, 13), and the absence of the name of Babylon are indicative of a pre-exilic date.[81] Arguments from style are always precarious; but it is striking that some critics, who deny that chaps. xxiv.-xxvii. can have come as a whole from Isaiah's time, profess to see his hand in certain passages.[82] Then, secondly, through these verses[429] which point to a pre-exilic date there are woven, almost inextricably, phrases of actual exile: expressions of the sense of living on a level and in contact with the heathen (xxvi. 9, 10); a request to God's people to withdraw from the midst of a heathen public to the privacy of their chambers (20, 21); prayers and promises of deliverance from the oppressor (passim); hopes of the establishment of Zion, and of the repopulation of the Holy Land. And, thirdly, some verses imply that the speaker has already returned to Zion itself: he says more than once, in this mountain; there are hymns celebrating a deliverance actually achieved, as—God has done a marvel. For Thou hast made a citadel into a heap, a fortified city into a ruin, a castle of strangers to be no city, not to be built again. Such phrases do not read as if the prophet were creating for the lips of his people a psalm of triumph against a far future deliverance; they have in them the ring of what has already happened.
We’ve noticed that there’s only a faint hint of historical reflection in chapter 24, and that the disaster mentioned there is on such a large scale that it can’t be confined to any specific period in Israel’s history. In chapters 25-27, which can be seen as a continuation of chapter 24, there are more historical references. In fact, there are so many that they contradict each other, confusing even the sharpest critics. They suggest historical situations for the prophecy both before and after the exile. On one hand, the blame for idolatry in Judah (27:9), the mentions of Assyria and Egypt (27:12, 13), and the absence of Babylon’s name suggest a date prior to the exile.[81] Arguments based on style can be shaky; however, it’s notable that some critics who say chapters 24-27 couldn’t possibly come from Isaiah’s time claim to see his influence in certain passages.[82] Then, in those verses[429] pointing to a pre-exilic date, phrases about the actual exile are woven in almost seamlessly: expressions of the feeling of living alongside the heathens (26:9, 10); a call for God’s people to step away from the heathen crowds into the privacy of their homes (20, 21); prayers and promises for deliverance from the oppressor (passim); hopes for the rebuilding of Zion and the repopulation of the Holy Land. Additionally, some verses suggest that the speaker has already returned to Zion: he mentions more than once, in this mountain; there are hymns celebrating a deliverance that has actually happened, as—God has performed a miracle. For You have turned a fortress into a pile of rubble, a fortified city into ruins, a stronghold of foreigners into a city that will not be rebuilt. Such phrases don’t sound like the prophet is crafting a song of triumph for a future deliverance; they resonate with the sense of something that has already occurred.
This bare statement of the allusions of the prophecy will give the ordinary reader some idea of the difficulties of Biblical criticism. What is to be made of a prophecy uttering the catch-words and breathing the experience of three distinct periods? One solution of the difficulty may be that we have here the composition of a Jew already returned from exile to a desecrated sanctuary and depopulated land, who has woven through his original utterances of complaint and hope the experience of earlier oppressions and deliverances, using even the names of earlier tyrants. In his immediate past a great city that oppressed the Jews has fallen, though, if this is Babylon, it is strange that he nowhere names it. But his intention is rather religious than historical; he seeks to give a general[430] representation of the attitude of the world to the people of God, and of the judgement which God brings on the world. This view of the composition is supported by either of two possible interpretations of that difficult verse xxvii. 1: In that day Jehovah with His sword, the hard and the great and the strong, shall perform visitation upon Leviathan, Serpent Elusive, and upon Leviathan, Serpent Tortuous; and He shall slay the Dragon that is in the sea. Cheyne treats these monsters as mythic personifications of the clouds, the darkness and the powers of the air, so that the verse means that, just as Jehovah is supreme in the physical world, He shall be in the moral. But it is more probable that the two Leviathans mean Assyria and Babylon—the Elusive one, Assyria on the swift-shooting Tigris; the Tortuous one, Babylon on the winding Euphrates—while the Dragon that is in the sea or the west is Egypt. But if the prophet speaks of a victory over Israel's three great enemies all at once, that means that he is talking universally or ideally; and this impression is further heightened by the mythic names he gives them. Such arguments, along with the undoubted post-exilic fragments in the prophecy, point to a late date, so that even a very conservative critic, who is satisfied that Isaiah is the author, admits that "the possibility of exilic authorship does not allow itself to be denied."
This straightforward statement about the references in the prophecy provides the average reader with some insight into the challenges of Biblical criticism. What are we to make of a prophecy that uses key phrases and reflects the experiences of three different time periods? One possible explanation is that we have the work of a Jew who has returned from exile to a ruined sanctuary and deserted land, who has woven in his original expressions of complaint and hope the experiences of past oppressions and rescues, even referencing earlier oppressors. In his recent past, a major city that harmed the Jews has fallen, though if this city is Babylon, it’s odd that he never names it. However, his aim seems more religious than historical; he’s trying to depict the overall attitude of the world towards God’s people, and the judgment that God brings upon the world. This interpretation of the composition is supported by either of two possible meanings of that tricky verse xxvii. 1: In that day Jehovah with His sword, the hard and the great and the strong, shall perform visitation upon Leviathan, Serpent Elusive, and upon Leviathan, Serpent Tortuous; and He shall slay the Dragon that is in the sea. Cheyne interprets these monsters as mythic representations of clouds, darkness, and the forces of the air, suggesting that just as Jehovah rules the physical realm, He will also dominate the moral realm. However, it’s more likely that the two Leviathans symbolize Assyria and Babylon—the Elusive one representing Assyria on the fast-moving Tigris River; and the Tortuous one representing Babylon on the winding Euphrates River—while the Dragon that is in the sea or the west refers to Egypt. If the prophet is indeed speaking of a victory over Israel's three biggest foes all at once, that implies he is addressing a universal or ideal scenario; and this impression is further emphasized by the mythic names he assigns to them. Such arguments, alongside the undeniable post-exilic fragments found in the prophecy, suggest a later date, so that even a very conservative critic, who believes Isaiah is the author, acknowledges that "the possibility of exilic authorship cannot be dismissed."
If this character which we attribute to the prophecy be correct—viz., that it is a summary or ideal account of the attitude of the alien world to Israel, and of the judgement God has ready for the world—then, though itself be exilic, its place in the Book of Isaiah is intelligible. Chaps. xxiv.-xxvii. fitly crown the long list of Isaiah's oracles upon the foreign nations;[431] they finally formulate the purposes of God towards the nations and towards Israel, whom the nations have oppressed. Our opinions must not be final or dogmatic about this matter of authorship; the obscurities are not nearly cleared up. But if it be ultimately found certain that this prophecy, which lies in the heart of the Book of Isaiah, is not by Isaiah himself, that need neither startle nor unsettle us. No doctrinal question is stirred by such a discovery, not even that of the accuracy of the Scriptures. For that a book is entitled by Isaiah's name does not necessarily mean that it is all by Isaiah; and we shall feel still less compelled to believe that these chapters are his when we find other chapters called by his name while these are not said to be by him. In truth there is a difficulty here, only because it is supposed that a book entitled by Isaiah's name must necessarily contain nothing but what is Isaiah's own. Tradition may have come to say so; but the Scripture itself, bearing as it does unmistakable marks of another age than Isaiah's, tells us that tradition is wrong: and the testimony of Scripture is surely to be preferred, especially when it betrays, as we have seen, sufficient reasons why a prophecy, though not Isaiah's, was attached to his genuine and undoubted oracles. In any case, however, as even the conservative critic whom we have quoted admits, "for the religious value" of the prophecy "the question" of the authorship "is thoroughly irrelevant."
If the character we assign to the prophecy is accurate—specifically, that it provides a summary or ideal view of how the foreign world perceives Israel and the judgment God has in store for it—then, even though it originates from the exile, its position in the Book of Isaiah makes sense. Chapters 24-27 effectively conclude Isaiah's extensive messages about the foreign nations; they ultimately articulate God's intentions toward the nations and toward Israel, whom those nations have oppressed. Our views shouldn't be final or dogmatic on this authorship issue; the uncertainties are far from resolved. However, if it turns out that this prophecy, located at the heart of the Book of Isaiah, isn't actually by Isaiah, that shouldn't surprise or disturb us. Such a finding doesn't raise any doctrinal issues, not even regarding the accuracy of the Scriptures. Just because a book bears Isaiah's name doesn’t mean everything in it was written by him; we will feel even less inclined to accept these chapters as his when we discover other chapters attributed to him that are not said to be written by him. There is indeed a challenge here, primarily because it's assumed that a book named after Isaiah must consist solely of his own work. While tradition may have come to believe this, the Scriptures themselves, which clearly show characteristics from a different era than Isaiah's, indicate that the tradition is mistaken: and the testimony of Scripture should be prioritized, especially when it reveals, as we have noted, valid reasons for why a prophecy, even if not Isaiah's, was associated with his genuine and unquestionable messages. In any case, as even the conservative critic we quoted acknowledges, "for the religious value" of the prophecy, "the question" of authorship "is thoroughly irrelevant."
We shall perceive this at once as we now turn to see what is the religious value of our prophecy. Chaps. xxv.-xxvii. stand in the front rank of evangelical prophecy. In their experience of religion, their characterisations of God's people, their expressions of faith, their missionary hopes and hopes of immortality,[432] they are very rich and edifying. Perhaps their most signal feature is their designation of the people of God. In this collection of prayers and hymns the people of God are not regarded as a political body. They are only once called the nation and spoken of in connection with a territory (xxvi. 15). Only twice are they named with the national names of Israel and Jacob (xxvii. 6, 9, 12). We miss Isaiah's promised king, his pictures of righteous government, his emphasis upon social justice and purity, his interest in the foreign politics of his State, his hopes of national grandeur and agricultural felicity. In these chapters God's people are described by adjectives signifying spiritual qualities. Their nationality is no more pleaded, only their suffering estate and their hunger and thirst after God. The ideals that are presented for the future are neither political nor social, but ecclesiastical. We saw how closely Isaiah's prophesying was connected with the history of his time. The people of this prophecy seem to have done with history, and to be interested only in worship. And along with the assurance of the continued establishment of Zion as the centre for a secure and holy people, filling a secure and fertile land,—with which, as we have seen, the undoubted visions of Isaiah content themselves, while silent as to the fate of the individuals who drop from this future through death,—we have the most abrupt and thrilling hopes expressed for the resurrection of these latter to share in the glory of the redeemed and restored community.
We will see this clearly as we now explore the religious significance of our prophecy. Chapters xxv.-xxvii. are among the top examples of evangelical prophecy. In their understanding of religion, their descriptions of God's people, their expressions of faith, their missionary hopes, and aspirations for immortality,[432] they are deeply enriching. Perhaps their most distinctive aspect is how they refer to the people of God. In this collection of prayers and hymns, the people of God are not seen as a political entity. They are referred to as the nation only once and mentioned in relation to a territory (xxvi. 15). They are named with the national titles of Israel and Jacob only twice (xxvii. 6, 9, 12). We notice the absence of Isaiah's promised king, his visions of just governance, his focus on social justice and purity, his concerns about the foreign politics of his state, and his aspirations for national greatness and agricultural prosperity. In these chapters, God's people are described using terms that signify spiritual qualities. Their national identity isn't emphasized; instead, they are depicted as a suffering community yearning for God. The ideals presented for the future are neither political nor social, but ecclesiastical. We observed how closely Isaiah's prophecies were tied to the history of his time. The people in this prophecy seem to have moved beyond history and are focused solely on worship. Along with the assurance that Zion will remain a secure and holy center for a devoted people, thriving in a safe and fertile land—an understanding that aligns with Isaiah's undeniable visions while remaining silent about the fates of individuals who may pass away—we find expressed some of the most striking and exciting hopes for the resurrection of these individuals to join in the glory of the redeemed and restored community.
Among the names applied to God's people there are three which were destined to play an enormous part in the history of religion. In the English version these appear as two: poor and needy; but in the original they are three. In chap. xxv. 4: [433]Thou hast been a stronghold to the poor and a stronghold to the needy, poor renders a Hebrew word, "dāl," literally wavering, tottering, infirm, then slender or lean, then poor in fortune and estate; needy literally renders the Hebrew "'ebhyôn," Latin egenus. In chap. xxvi. 6: the foot of the poor and the steps of the needy, needy renders "dāl," while poor renders "'ānî," a passive form—forced, afflicted, oppressed, then wretched, whether under persecution, poverty, loneliness or exile, and so tamed, mild, meek. These three words, in their root ideas of infirmity, need and positive affliction, cover among them every aspect of physical poverty and distress. Let us see how they came also to be the expression of the highest moral and evangelical virtues.
Among the names given to God's people, three were set to play a huge role in the history of religion. In the English version, these appear as two: poor and needy; but in the original text, they are three. In chap. xxv. 4: [433]You've been a stronghold for the poor and a stronghold for the needy, poor translates a Hebrew word, "dāl," which literally means wavering, tottering, infirm, then slender or lean, and finally poor in terms of wealth and status; needy is the direct translation of the Hebrew "'ebhyôn," Latin egenus. In chap. xxvi. 6: the foot of the poor and the steps of the needy, needy translates "dāl," while poor translates "'ānî," a passive form—forced, afflicted, oppressed, then wretched, whether from persecution, poverty, loneliness, or exile—and thus tamed, mild, meek. These three words, in their basic meanings of infirmity, need, and positive affliction, encompass every aspect of physical poverty and suffering. Let's explore how they also reflect the highest moral and evangelical virtues.
If there is one thing which distinguishes the people of the revelation from other historical nations, it is the evidence afforded by their dictionaries of the power to transmute the most afflicting experiences of life into virtuous disposition and effectual desire for God. We see this most clearly if we contrast the Hebrews' use of their words for poor with that of the first language which was employed to translate these words—the Greek in the Septuagint version of the Old Testament. In the Greek temper there was a noble pity for the unfortunate; the earliest Greeks regarded beggars as the peculiar protegés of Heaven. Greek philosophy developed a capacity for enriching the soul in misfortune; Stoicism gave imperishable proof of how bravely a man could hold poverty and pain to be things indifferent, and how much gain from such indifference he could bring to his soul. But in the vulgar opinion of Greece penury and sickness were always disgraceful; and Greek dictionaries mark the degradation of terms, which at first merely noted physical disadvantage, into[434] epithets of contempt or hopelessness. It is very striking that it was not till they were employed to translate the Old Testament ideas of poverty that the Greek words for "poor" and "lowly" came to bear an honourable significance. And in the case of the Stoic, who endured poverty or pain with such indifference, was it not just this indifference that prevented him from discovering in his tribulations the rich evangelical experience which, as we shall see, fell to the quick conscience and sensitive nerves of the Hebrew?
If there's one thing that sets the people of the revelation apart from other historical nations, it's the evidence in their dictionaries showing their ability to transform the most painful experiences of life into virtuous character and a genuine desire for God. We can see this most clearly when we compare how the Hebrews used their words for poor with the first language used to translate those words—the Greek in the Septuagint version of the Old Testament. The Greek mindset had a noble sympathy for the unfortunate; the early Greeks viewed beggars as unique favorites of Heaven. Greek philosophy fostered a way to enrich the soul in times of misfortune; Stoicism provided lasting evidence of how bravely a person could consider poverty and pain as insignificant, and how much strength this attitude could bring to their soul. However, in common Greek opinion, poverty and illness were always seen as shameful; Greek dictionaries reflect the degradation of terms that initially just described physical hardship into[434] terms of disdain or hopelessness. It's notable that it wasn't until these words were used to translate the Old Testament concepts of poverty that the Greek terms for "poor" and "lowly" acquired a respectable meaning. And in the case of the Stoic, who faced poverty or pain with such indifference, wasn't it precisely this indifference that kept him from finding in his suffering the rich spiritual experience that, as we will see, was revealed to the keen conscience and sensitive nature of the Hebrew?
Let us see how this conscience was developed. In the East poverty scarcely ever means physical disadvantage alone: in its train there follow higher disabilities. A poor Eastern cannot be certain of fair play in the courts of the land. He is very often a wronged man, with a fire of righteous anger burning in his breast. Again, and more important, misfortune is to the quick religious instinct of the Oriental a sign of God's estrangement. With us misfortune is so often only the cruelty, sometimes real sometimes imagined, of the rich; the unemployed vents his wrath at the capitalist, the tramp shakes his fist after the carriage on the highway. In the East they do not forget to curse the rich, but they remember as well to humble themselves beneath the hand of God. With an unfortunate Oriental the conviction is supreme, God is angry with me; I have lost His favour. His soul eagerly longs for God.
Let’s explore how this conscience was formed. In the East, poverty rarely just means physical hardship; it also brings along greater struggles. A poor person in the East can’t count on getting fair treatment in the courts. They often feel wronged, with a deep sense of righteous anger inside them. More importantly, misfortune, to the deeply religious Eastern mindset, is seen as a sign of God's disapproval. For us, misfortune often feels like the unfairness—sometimes real, sometimes imagined—of the wealthy; the unemployed person directs their anger at the capitalist, while a homeless person shakes their fist at carriages on the road. In the East, people don’t just remember to criticize the rich; they also remember to humble themselves before God. For an unfortunate person in the East, the belief is strong: God is upset with me; I’ve lost His favor. Their soul desperately yearns for God.
A poor man in the East has, therefore, not only a hunger for food: he has the hotter hunger for justice, the deeper hunger for God. Poverty in itself, without extraneous teaching, develops nobler appetites. The physical, becomes the moral, pauper; poor in substance, he grows poor in spirit. It was by developing, with the[435] aid of God's Spirit, this quick conscience and this deep desire for God, which in the East are the very soul of physical poverty, that the Jews advanced to that sense of evangelical poverty of heart, blessed by Jesus in the first of His Beatitudes as the possession of the kingdom of heaven.
A poor man in the East not only feels hunger for food; he also has a stronger hunger for justice and a deeper hunger for God. Poverty on its own, without outside influences, fosters higher aspirations. The physical poverty transforms into moral poverty; lacking material wealth, he becomes spiritually impoverished. It was by nurturing, with the[435] help of God's Spirit, this heightened awareness and profound longing for God, which in the East are the essence of material poverty, that the Jews reached that sense of true poverty of heart, blessed by Jesus in the first of His Beatitudes as the gateway to the kingdom of heaven.
Till the Exile, however, the poor were only a portion of the people. In the Exile the whole nation became poor, and henceforth "God's poor" might become synonymous with "God's people." This was the time when the words received their spiritual baptism. Israel felt the physical curse of poverty to its extreme of famine. The pains, privations and terrors, which the glib tongues of our comfortable middle classes, as they sing the psalms of Israel, roll off so easily for symbols of their own spiritual experience, were felt by the captive Hebrews in all their concrete physical effects. The noble and the saintly, the gentle and the cultured, priest, soldier and citizen, woman, youth and child, were torn from home and estate, were deprived of civil standing, were imprisoned, fettered, flogged and starved to death. We learn something of what it must have been from the words which Jeremiah addressed to Baruch, a youth of good family and fine culture: Seekest thou great things for thyself? Seek them not, for, behold, I will bring evil upon all flesh, saith the Lord; only thy life will I give unto thee for a prey in all places whither thou goest. Imagine a whole nation plunged into poverty of this degree—not born into it having known no better things, nor stunted into it with sensibility and the power of expression sapped out of them, but plunged into it, with the unimpaired culture, conscience and memories of the flower of the people. When God's own hand sent[436] fresh from Himself a poet's soul into "the clay biggin'" of an Ayrshire ploughman, what a revelation we received of the distress, the discipline and the graces of poverty! But in the Jewish nation as it passed into exile there were a score of hearts with as unimpaired an appetite for life as Robert Burns; and, worse than he, they went to feel its pangs away from home. Genius, conscience and pride drank to the dregs in a foreign land the bitter cup of the poor. The Psalms and Lamentations show us how they bore their poison. A Greek Stoic might sneer at the complaint and sobbing, the self-abasement so strangely mixed with fierce cries for vengeance. But the Jew had within him the conscience that will not allow a man to be a Stoic. He never forgot that it was for his sin he suffered, and therefore to him suffering could not be a thing indifferent. With this, his native hunger for justice reached in captivity a famine pitch; his sense of guilt was equalled by as sincere an indignation at the tyrant who held him in his brutal grasp. The feeling of estrangement from God increased to a degree that only the exile of a Jew could excite: the longing for God's house and the worship lawful only there; the longing for the relief which only the sacrifices of the Temple could bestow; the longing for God's own presence and the light of His face. My soul thirsteth for Thee, my flesh longeth after Thee, in a dry and thirsty land, where no water is, as I have looked upon Thee in the sanctuary, to see Thy power and Thy glory. For Thy lovingkindness is better than life!
Until the Exile, the poor were just a part of the population. During the Exile, the entire nation became impoverished, and from then on, "God's poor" became synonymous with "God's people." This was when those words underwent their spiritual awakening. Israel experienced the harsh physical burden of poverty, reaching extreme levels of famine. The suffering, deprivations, and fears that the comfortable middle class easily discuss while comfortably singing Israel's psalms were lived daily by the captive Hebrews in all their raw physical consequences. The noble, the saintly, the gentle, the cultured—priests, soldiers, citizens, women, youths, and children—were ripped from their homes and properties, stripped of their civil rights, imprisoned, shackled, whipped, and starved. We catch a glimpse of their suffering from the words Jeremiah spoke to Baruch, a young man from a good family with a strong education: Are you seeking great things for yourself? Don't seek them, because, behold, I will bring disaster upon all people, says the Lord; only your life will I spare for you as a prize wherever you go. Imagine an entire nation plunged into such deep poverty—not born into it, knowing nothing better, nor numbed to it with their sensitivity and ability to express themselves drained away, but thrown into it with their intact culture, conscience, and memories of the best of their people. When God sent a poet's soul straight from Himself into "the clay biggin'" of an Ayrshire farmer, we received a powerful glimpse of the hardships, lessons, and virtues of poverty! Yet, among the Jewish nation taken into exile, there were countless hearts with just as strong a desire for life as Robert Burns; and, even worse than him, they faced the pain far away from home. Genius, conscience, and pride faced a harsh reality in a foreign land, drinking deeply from the bitter cup of poverty. The Psalms and Lamentations reveal how they dealt with their suffering. A Greek Stoic might mock their complaints and sorrow, their self-deprecation mixed with fierce calls for vengeance. But the Jew had a conscience that wouldn’t allow him to be a Stoic. He never forgot that it was his sins that caused his suffering, making pain something he couldn’t take lightly. Along with this, his innate thirst for justice intensified in captivity; his guilt was matched by a deep indignation toward the tyrants who held him in their cruel grip. The feeling of separation from God grew to a degree that only a Jewish exile could know: the yearning for God's house and the worship that could only happen there; the desire for the relief that only the Temple sacrifices could bring; the longing for God's presence and the light of His face. My soul thirsts for You, my flesh longs for You in a dry and thirsty land where there is no water, as I have looked upon You in the sanctuary to see Your power and glory. For Your lovingkindness is better than life!
Thy lovingkindness is better than life!—is the secret of it all. There is that which excites a deeper hunger in the soul than the hunger for life, and for the food and money that give life. This spiritual poverty is[437] most richly bred in physical penury, it is strong enough to displace what feeds it. The physical poverty of Israel which had awakened these other hungers of the soul—hunger for forgiveness, hunger for justice, hunger for God—was absorbed by them; and when Israel came out of exile, to be poor meant, not so much to be indigent in this world's substance as to feel the need of pardon, the absence of righteousness, the want of God.
Your lovingkindness is better than life!—that’s the key to it all. There’s something that stirs a deeper longing in the soul than the longing for life itself, and for the resources that sustain it. This spiritual emptiness is[437] most deeply rooted in physical poverty; it’s powerful enough to overshadow what typically satisfies it. The physical poverty of Israel had awakened these other deep longings of the soul—longings for forgiveness, longings for justice, longings for God—and they were absorbed by them; and when Israel emerged from exile, to be poor meant not so much being lacking in worldly goods but rather feeling the need for forgiveness, the lack of righteousness, the longing for God.
It is at this time, as we have seen, that Isa. xxiv.-xxvii. was written; and it is in the temper of this time that the three Hebrew words for "poor" and "needy" are used in chaps. xxv. and xxvi. The returned exiles were still politically dependent and abjectly poor. Their discipline therefore continued, and did not allow them to forget their new lessons. In fact, they developed the results of these further, till in this prophecy we find no fewer than five different aspects of spiritual poverty.
It is during this time, as we've observed, that Isa. xxiv.-xxvii. was written; and it reflects the mood of this period that the three Hebrew words for "poor" and "needy" are used in chapters xxv. and xxvi. The returning exiles were still politically dependent and very poor. Therefore, their discipline continued, ensuring they wouldn't forget their new lessons. In fact, they developed these ideas further, and in this prophecy, we find no less than five different aspects of spiritual poverty.
1. We have already seen how strong the sense of sin is in chap. xxiv. This POVERTY of PEACE is not so fully expressed in the following chapters, and indeed seems crowded out by the sense of the iniquity of the inhabitants of the earth and the desire for their judgement (xxvi. 21).
1. We've already noticed how deep the sense of sin is in chapter 24. This POVERTY of Peace isn't as clearly stated in the following chapters and actually feels overshadowed by the awareness of the wickedness of the people on earth and the longing for their judgment (26:21).
2. The feeling of the POVERTY of JUSTICE is very strong in this prophecy. But it is to be satisfied; in part it has been satisfied (xxv. 1-4). A strong city, probably Babylon, has fallen. Moab shall be trodden down in his place, even as straw is trodden down in the water of the dunghill. The complete judgement is to come when the Lord shall destroy the two Leviathans and the great Dragon of the west (xxvii. 1). It is followed by the restoration of Israel to the state in which Isaiah (chap. v. 1) sang so sweetly of her. [438]A pleasant vineyard, sing ye of her. I, Jehovah, her Keeper, moment by moment do I water her; lest any make a raid upon her, night and day will I keep her. The Hebrew text then reads, Fury is not in Me; but probably the Septuagint version has preserved the original meaning: I have no walls. If this be correct, then Jehovah is describing the present state of Jerusalem, the fulfilment of Isaiah's threat, chap. v. 6: Walls I have not; let there but be briers and thorns before me! With war will I stride against them; I will burn them together. But then there breaks the softer alternative of the reconciliation of Judah's enemies: Or else let him seize hold of My strength; let him make peace with Me—peace let him make with Me. In such a peace Israel shall spread, and his fulness become the riches of the Gentiles. In that by-and-bye Jacob shall take root, Israel blossom and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit.
2. The sense of the LOW INCOME of Justice is very strong in this prophecy. But it will be fulfilled; part of it has already been fulfilled (xxv. 1-4). A strong city, likely Babylon, has fallen. Moab will be trampled down in his place, just like straw is trampled in the water of a cesspool. The complete judgment will come when the Lord destroys the two Leviathans and the great Dragon of the west (xxvii. 1). This will be followed by the restoration of Israel to the state that Isaiah (chap. v. 1) beautifully sang about. [438]A pleasant vineyard, sing of her. I, Jehovah, her Keeper, water her constantly; so that no one can raid her, I will protect her day and night. The Hebrew text then says, Fury is not in Me; but probably the Septuagint version captured the original meaning: I have no walls. If this is correct, then Jehovah is describing the current state of Jerusalem, fulfilling Isaiah's threat, chap. v. 6: I have no walls; let there only be briers and thorns before me! I will march against them with war; I will burn them all together. However, there is also the softer possibility of reconciling Judah's enemies: Or let him take hold of My strength; let him make peace with Me—peace let him make with Me. In such peace, Israel will flourish, and his fullness will become the wealth of the nations. Eventually, Jacob will take root, Israel will blossom and bud, and fill the world with fruit.
Perhaps the wildest cries that rose from Israel's famine of justice were those which found expression in chap. xxxiv. This chapter is so largely a repetition of feelings we have already met with elsewhere in the Book of Isaiah, that it is necessary now only to mention its original features. The subject is, as in chap. xiii., the Lord's judgement upon all the nations; and as chap. xiii. singled out Babylon for special doom, so chap. xxxiv. singles out Edom. The reason of this distinction will be very plain to the reader of the Old Testament. From the day the twins struggled in their mother Rebekah's womb, Israel and Edom were either at open war or burned towards each other with a hate, which was the more intense for wanting opportunities of gratification. It is an Eastern edition of the worst chapters in the history of England and Ireland. No bloodier massacres stained Jewish hands than those which[439] attended their invasions of Edom, and Jewish psalms of vengeance are never more flagrant than when they touch the name of the children of Esau. The only gentle utterance of the Old Testament upon Israel's hereditary foe is a comfortless enigma. Isaiah's Oracle for Dumah (xxii. 11 f.), shows that even that large-hearted prophet, in face of his people's age-long resentment at Edom's total want of appreciation of Israel's spiritual superiority, could offer Edom, though for the moment submissive and inquiring, nothing but a sad, ambiguous answer. Edom and Israel, each after his fashion, exulted in the other's misfortunes: Israel by bitter satire when Edom's impregnable mountain-range was treacherously seized and overrun by his allies (Obadiah 4-9); Edom, with the harassing, pillaging habits of a highland tribe, hanging on to the skirts of Judah's great enemies, and cutting off Jewish fugitives, or selling them into slavery, or malignantly completing the ruin of Jerusalem's walls after her overthrow by the Chaldeans (Obadiah 10-14; Ezek. xxxv. 10-15; Ps. cxxxi. 7). In the quarrel of Zion with the nations of the world Edom had taken the wrong side,—his profane, earthy nature incapable of understanding his brother's spiritual claims, and therefore envious of him, with the brutal malice of ignorance, and spitefully glad to assist in disappointing such claims. This is what we must remember when we read the indignant verses of chap. xxxiv. Israel, conscious of his spiritual calling in the world, felt bitter resentment that his own brother should be so vulgarly hostile to his attempts to carry it out. It is not our wish to defend the temper of Israel towards Edom. The silence of Christ before the Edomite Herod and his men of war has taught the spiritual servants of God what is their proper attitude[440] towards the malignant and obscene treatment of their claims by vulgar men. But at least let us remember that chap. xxxiv., for all its fierceness, is inspired by Israel's conviction of a spiritual destiny and service for God, and by the natural resentment that his own kith and kin should be doing their best to render these futile. That a famine of bread makes its victims delirious does not tempt us to doubt the genuineness of their need and suffering. As little ought we to doubt or to ignore the reality or the purity of those spiritual convictions, the prolonged starvation of which bred in Israel such feverish hate against his twin-brother Esau. Chap. xxxiv., with all its proud prophecy of judgement, is, therefore, also a symptom of that aspect of Israel's poverty of heart, which we have called a hunger for the Divine justice.
Perhaps the loudest cries that emerged from Israel's lack of justice were those expressed in chap. xxxiv. This chapter largely repeats feelings we've encountered elsewhere in the Book of Isaiah, so we only need to mention its unique aspects now. The subject is, as in chap. xiii., the Lord's judgment on all nations; just as chap. xiii. singled out Babylon for special doom, chap. xxxiv. focuses on Edom. The reason for this focus will be clear to anyone familiar with the Old Testament. From the day the twins struggled in their mother Rebekah's womb, Israel and Edom were either in open conflict or burned with a hatred that was even more intense due to the lack of opportunities to express it. It’s a version of the worst chapters in the history of England and Ireland. No bloody massacres stained Jewish hands more than those that occurred during their invasions of Edom, and Jewish psalms of vengeance are never more intense than when they mention the children of Esau. The only gentle reference to Israel's hereditary foe in the Old Testament is a comfortless riddle. Isaiah's Oracle for Dumah (xxii. 11 f.) shows that even this broad-minded prophet, facing his people's long-standing resentment towards Edom's total lack of appreciation for Israel's spiritual superiority, could offer Edom, despite its brief submissiveness and inquiry, nothing but a sad, vague reply. Edom and Israel, each in its own way, took pleasure in the other's misfortunes: Israel through harsh satire when Edom's seemingly impenetrable mountain-range was treacherously taken over by its allies (Obadiah 4-9); Edom, with the harassing, plundering habits of a highland tribe, clinging to the enemies of Judah and attacking Jewish refugees, selling them into slavery, or maliciously helping to complete the ruin of Jerusalem's walls after its defeat by the Chaldeans (Obadiah 10-14; Ezek. xxxv. 10-15; Ps. cxxxi. 7). In the quarrel of Zion with the nations, Edom took the wrong side—its profane, earthly nature unable to grasp its brother's spiritual claims, leading to envy and the brutal malice of ignorance, and spitefully glad to assist in thwarting those claims. This is what we must keep in mind when reading the furious verses of chap. xxxiv. Israel, aware of its spiritual calling in the world, felt deep resentment that its own brother could be so crudely hostile to its efforts in that regard. We don't intend to defend Israel's attitude toward Edom. Christ's silence before the Edomite Herod and his warriors has taught the spiritual servants of God what their proper attitude should be towards the malignant and obscene treatment of their claims by rude men. But let’s at least remember that chap. xxxiv., fierce as it is, is fueled by Israel's conviction of a spiritual destiny and service to God, and by a natural resentment that its own family should be actively working to undermine those efforts. Just as we don't doubt the genuine suffering and need of those suffering from a lack of bread, we should not doubt or ignore the reality or purity of those spiritual convictions, the prolonged absence of which fueled Israel's feverish hatred for its twin-brother Esau. Therefore, chap. xxxiv., with all its proud prophecy of judgment, is also a symptom of that aspect of Israel's poverty of heart, which we’ve referred to as a hunger for Divine justice.
3. Poverty of the Exile. But as fair flowers bloom upon rough stalks, so from Israel's stern challenges of justice there break sweet prayers for home. Chap. xxxiv., the effusion of vengeance on Edom, is followed by chap. xxxv., the going forth of hope to the return from exile and the establishment of the ransomed of the Lord in Zion.[83] Chap. xxxv. opens with a prospect beyond the return, but after the first two verses addresses itself to the people still in a foreign captivity, speaking of their salvation (vv. 3, 4), of the miracles that will take place in themselves (vv. 5, 6) and in the desert between them and their home (vv. 6, 7), of the[441] highway which God shall build, evident and secure (vv. 8, 9), and of the final arrival in Zion (ver. 10). In that march the usual disappointments and illusions of desert life shall disappear. The mirage shall become a pool; and the clump of vegetation which afar off the hasty traveller hails for a sign of water, but which on his approach he discovers to be the withered grass of a jackal's lair, shall indeed be reeds and rushes, standing green in fresh water. Out of this exuberant fertility there emerges in the prophet's thoughts a great highway, on which the poetry of the chapter gathers and reaches its climax. Have we of this nineteenth century, with our more rapid means of passage, not forgotten the poetry of the road? Are we able to appreciate either the intrinsic usefulness or the gracious symbolism of the king's highway? How can we know it as the Bible-writers or our forefathers knew it when they made the road the main line of their allegories and parables of life? Let us listen to these verses as they strike the three great notes in the music of the road: And an highway shall be there, and a way; yea, The Way of Holiness shall it be called, for the unclean shall not pass over it—that is what is to distinguish this road from all other roads. But here is what it is as being a road. First, it shall be unmistakably plain: The wayfaring man, yea fools, shall not err therein. Second, it shall be perfectly secure: No lion shall be there, nor shall any ravenous beast go up thereon; they shall not be met with there. Third, it shall bring to a safe arrival and ensure a complete overtaking: And the ransomed of the Lord shall return and come with singing unto Zion, and everlasting joy shall be upon their heads; they shall overtake gladness and joy, and sorrow and sighing shall flee away.
3. Exile's Poverty. Just like beautiful flowers bloom on rough stalks, sweet prayers for home emerge from Israel's harsh demands for justice. Chapter 34, which expresses vengeance against Edom, is followed by chapter 35, which brings hope for the return from exile and the establishment of the Lord’s redeemed in Zion.[83] Chapter 35 begins with a vision beyond the return but, after the first two verses, addresses those still in foreign captivity. It speaks of their salvation (vv. 3, 4), the miracles that will happen to them (vv. 5, 6) and in the wilderness between them and their home (vv. 6, 7), the highway that God will build, clear and safe (vv. 8, 9), and their eventual arrival in Zion (v. 10). On this journey, the usual disappointments and illusions of desert life will vanish. The mirage will turn into a pool; and the patch of greenery that the hasty traveler sees from a distance as a sign of water, only to find upon closer inspection that it is just the dried grass of a jackal's den, will indeed be reeds and rushes, lush and thriving in fresh water. From this abundant fertility, the prophet envisions a great highway, where the poetry of the chapter comes together and reaches its peak. Have we in the nineteenth century, with our faster modes of travel, forgotten the poetry of the journey? Can we truly appreciate either the intrinsic value or the beautiful symbolism of the king's highway? How can we understand it as the biblical writers or our ancestors did when they made the road the central theme of their allegories and life lessons? Let’s listen to these verses as they hit the three major notes in the music of the road: And there shall be a highway, and a way; yes, it shall be called The Way of Holiness, for the unclean shall not travel on it—that is what sets this road apart from all others. But here’s what it means as a road. First, it shall be undeniably clear: The wayfaring man, even fools, will not stray from it. Second, it shall be completely safe: No lion shall be there, nor any ferocious beast shall pass through it; they will not be encountered. Third, it will ensure safe arrival and total fulfillment: And the redeemed of the Lord shall return and come singing to Zion, and everlasting joy shall be upon their heads; they shall attain happiness and joy, and sorrow and sighing shall vanish away.
4. So Israel was to come home. But to Israel[442] home meant the Temple, and the Temple meant God. The poverty of the Exile was, in the essence of it, Poverty of God, Poverty of love. The prayers which express this are very beautiful,—that trail like wounded animals to the feet of their master, and look up in His face with large eyes of pain. And they shall say in that day, Lo, this is our God: we have waited for Him, that He should save us; this is the LORD: we have waited for Him; we will rejoice and be glad in His salvation.... Yea, in the way of Thy ordinances, O LORD, have we waited for Thee; to Thy name and to Thy Memorial was the desire of our soul. With my soul have I desired Thee in the night; yea, by my spirit within me do I seek Thee with dawn (chaps. xxv. 9; xxvi. 8).
4. So Israel was destined to return home. But for Israel[442] home meant the Temple, and the Temple was synonymous with God. The hardship of Exile was fundamentally aGod's Poverty, Love's Poverty. The prayers that reflect this are quite beautiful—they crawl like wounded animals to their master’s feet and look up at Him with large, pained eyes. And they shall say in that day, Look, this is our God: we have waited for Him to save us; this is the LORD: we have waited for Him; we will rejoice and be glad in His salvation.... Yes, in the way of Your laws, O LORD, we have waited for You; our soul longed for Your name and Your remembrance. With my soul, I have desired You in the night; yes, by my spirit within me, I seek You at dawn (chaps. xxv. 9; xxvi. 8).
An Arctic explorer was once asked, whether during eight months of slow starvation which he and his comrades endured they suffered much from the pangs of hunger. No, he answered, we lost them in the sense of abandonment, in the feeling that our countrymen had forgotten us and were not coming to the rescue. It was not till we were rescued and looked in human faces that we felt how hungry we were. So is it ever with God's poor. They forget all other need, as Israel did, in their need of God. Their outward poverty is only the weeds of their heart's widowhood. But Jehovah of hosts shall make to all the peoples in this mountain a banquet of fat things, a banquet of wines on the lees, fat things bemarrowed, wines on the lees refined.
An Arctic explorer was once asked if he and his comrades felt a lot of hunger during the eight months of slow starvation they endured. He replied that they didn't really feel it because of the sense of abandonment and the thought that their fellow countrymen had forgotten them and wouldn't come to rescue them. It wasn’t until they were saved and looked into human faces that they realized how hungry they truly were. The same is true for those in need of God. They forget all other needs, just like Israel did, when they are in need of Him. Their outward poverty is merely a sign of their heart's emptiness. But Jehovah of hosts shall make to all the peoples in this mountain a banquet of fat things, a banquet of wines on the lees, fat things bemarrowed, wines on the lees refined.
We need only note here—for it will come up for detailed treatment in connection with the second half of Isaiah—that the centre of Israel's restored life is to be the Temple, not, as in Isaiah's day, the king; that her dispersed are to gather from all parts of the world at[443] the sound of the Temple trumpet; and that her national life is to consist in worship (cf. xxvii. 13).
We just need to point out here—for this will be discussed in detail in the second half of Isaiah—that the heart of Israel's renewed life will be the Temple, not the king as it was in Isaiah's time; that its dispersed people will gather from all over the world at[443] the sound of the Temple trumpet; and that its national life will revolve around worship (cf. xxvii. 13).
These then were four aspects of Israel's poverty of heart: a hunger for pardon, a hunger for justice, a hunger for home, and a hunger for God. For the returning Jews these wants were satisfied only to reveal a deeper poverty still, the complaint and comfort of which we must reserve to another chapter.
These were four aspects of Israel's deep emotional struggles: a desire for forgiveness, a desire for justice, a desire for belonging, and a desire for God. For the returning Jewish people, these needs were met, only to uncover an even deeper struggle, the details of which we will save for another chapter.
CHAPTER XXX.
THE RESURRECTION.
Isaiah xxvi. 14-19; xxv. 6-9.
Isaiah 26:14-19; 25:6-9.
Granted the pardon, the justice, the Temple and the God, which the returning exiles now enjoyed, the possession of these only makes more painful the shortness of life itself. This life is too shallow and too frail a vessel to hold peace and righteousness and worship and the love of God. St. Paul has said, If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable. What avails it to have been pardoned, to have regained the Holy Land and the face of God, if the dear dead are left behind in graves of exile, and all the living must soon pass into that captivity,[84] from which there is no return?
Granted the pardon, the justice, the Temple, and the God that the returning exiles now enjoyed, possessing these only makes the shortness of life itself even more painful. This life is too shallow and too fragile a vessel to hold peace, righteousness, worship, and the love of God. St. Paul has said, If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable. What does it matter to have been pardoned, to have regained the Holy Land and the presence of God, if our beloved dead are left behind in graves of exile, and all the living must soon transition into that captivity,[84] from which there is no return?
It must have been thoughts like these, which led to the expression of one of the most abrupt and powerful of the few hopes of the resurrection which the Old Testament contains. This hope, which lightens chap. xxv. 7, 8, bursts through again—without logical connection with the context—in vv. 14-19 of chap. xxvi.
It must have been thoughts like these that led to the expression of one of the most sudden and powerful hopes for resurrection found in the Old Testament. This hope, which brightens chap. xxv. 7, 8, breaks through again—without logical connection to the context—in vv. 14-19 of chap. xxvi.
The English version makes ver. 14 to continue the reference to the lords, whom in ver. 13 Israel confesses to have served instead of Jehovah. "They are dead; they shall not live: they are deceased; they shall not rise."[445] Our translators have thus intruded into their version the verb "they are," of which the original is without a trace. In the original, dead and deceased (literally shades) are themselves the subject of the sentence—a new subject and without logical connection with what has gone before. The literal translation of ver. 14 therefore runs: Dead men do not live; shades do not rise: wherefore Thou visitest them and destroyest them, and perisheth all memory of them. The prophet states a fact, and draws an inference. The fact is, that no one has ever returned from the dead; the inference, that it is God's own visitation or sentence which has gone forth upon them, and they have really ceased to exist. But how intolerable a thought is this in presence of the other fact that God has here on earth above gloriously enlarged and established His people (ver. 15). Thou hast increased the nation, Jehovah; Thou hast increased the nation. Thou hast covered Thyself with glory; Thou hast expanded all the boundaries of the land. To this follows a verse (16), the sense of which is obscure, but palpable. It "feels" to mean that the contrast which the prophet has just painted between the absolute perishing of the dead and the glory of the Church above ground is the cause of great despair and groaning: O Jehovah, in The Trouble they supplicate Thee; they pour out incantations when Thy discipline is upon them.[85] In face of The Trouble[446] and The Discipline par excellence of God, what else can man do but betake himself to God? God sent death; in death He is the only resource. Israel's feelings in presence of The Trouble are now expressed in ver. 17: Like as a woman with child that draweth near the time of her delivery writheth and crieth out in her pangs, so have we been before Thee, O Jehovah. Thy Church on earth is pregnant with a life, which death does not allow to come to the birth. We have been with child; we have been in the pangs, as it were; we have brought forth wind; we make not the earth, in spite of all we have really accomplished upon it in our return, our restoration and our enjoyment of Thy presence—we make not the earth salvation, neither are the inhabitants of the world born.[86]
The English version continues in verse 14 to refer to the lords that Israel admits to having served instead of Jehovah in verse 13. "They are dead; they shall not live: they are deceased; they shall not rise."[445] Our translators have inserted the phrase "they are" in their version, even though the original text doesn’t include it at all. In the original, dead and deceased (literally shades) are the subjects of the sentence themselves—a new subject that doesn’t logically connect with what was previously stated. The literal translation of verse 14 would be: Dead men do not live; shades do not rise: therefore You visit them and destroy them, and all memory of them perishes. The prophet asserts a fact and draws a conclusion. The fact is that no one has ever come back from the dead; the conclusion is that it’s God’s own visitation or sentence that has gone out against them, and they have truly ceased to exist. But how unbearable is this thought in light of the fact that God has gloriously expanded and established His people here on earth (verse 15). You have increased the nation, Jehovah; You have increased the nation. You have covered Yourself with glory; You have extended all the boundaries of the land. This is followed by a verse (16) whose meaning is unclear but evident. It "feels" like it means that the stark contrast the prophet just described between the complete disappearance of the dead and the glory of the Church on earth causes great despair and groaning: O Jehovah, in The Trouble they plead with You; they pour out prayers when Your discipline is upon them.[85] In the face of The Trouble[446] and The Discipline par excellence of God, what else can man do but turn to God? God sent death; in death, He is the only support. Israel’s feelings in light of The Trouble are now expressed in verse 17: Like a woman with child who is nearing her time of delivery, writhing and crying out in her pains, so have we been before You, O Jehovah. Your Church on earth is pregnant with a life that death will not permit to be born. We have been with child; we have felt the pains, so to speak; we have brought forth wind; we have not made the earth, despite all that we have truly accomplished upon it in our return, our restoration, and our enjoyment of Your presence—we have not made the earth salvation, nor are the inhabitants of the world born.[86]
The figures are bold. Israel achieves, through God's grace, everything but the recovery of her dead; this, which alone is worth calling salvation, remains wanting to her great record of deliverances. The living Israel is restored, but how meagre a proportion of the people it is! The graves of home and of exile do not give up their dead. These are not born again to be inhabitants of the upper world.
The numbers are impressive. Israel, thanks to God’s grace, accomplishes everything except bringing her dead back to life; this, which is the only true salvation, is missing from her impressive list of rescues. The living Israel is revived, but it's such a small fraction of the population! The graves at home and those in exile don’t release their dead. They aren't reborn to occupy the world above.
The figures are bold, but bolder is the hope that breaks from them. Like as when the Trumpet shall[447] sound, ver. 19 peals forth the promise of the resurrection—peals the promise forth, in spite of all experience, unsupported by any argument, and upon the strength of its own inherent music. Thy dead shall live! my dead bodies shall arise! The change of the personal pronoun is singularly dramatic. Returned Israel is the speaker, first speaking to herself: thy dead, as if upon the depopulated land, in face of all its homes in ruin, and only the sepulchres of ages standing grim and steadfast, she addressed some despairing double of herself; and secondly speaking of herself: my dead bodies, as if all the inhabitants of these tombs, though dead, were still her own, still part of her, the living Israel, and able to arise and bless with their numbers their bereaved mother. These she now addresses: Awake and sing, ye dwellers in the dust, for a dew of lights is Thy dew, and the land bringeth forth the dead.[87]
The figures are striking, but even more striking is the hope that emerges from them. Just like when the trumpet sounds[447], verse 19 proclaims the promise of resurrection—declares this promise loudly, despite all experiences, without any proof, solely based on its own inherent power. Your dead will live! My dead bodies will rise! The shift in the personal pronoun is particularly dramatic. Returning Israel is the speaker, first addressing herself: your dead, as if in the desolate land, facing all the ruins of homes and only the tombs of ages standing bleak and resolute, she is speaking to a sorrowful part of herself; and then she speaks of herself: my dead bodies, as if all the people in these tombs, though dead, still belong to her, still part of her, the living Israel, and able to rise and bless their grieving mother with their numbers. Now she addresses them: Awake and sing, you who dwell in the dust, for a dew of lights is Your dew, and the land brings forth the dead.[87]
If one has seen a place of graves in the East, he will appreciate the elements of this figure, which takes dust for death and dew for life. With our damp graveyards mould has become the traditional trappings of death; but where under the hot Eastern sun things do not rot into lower forms of life, but crumble into sapless powder, that will not keep a worm in life, dust is the natural symbol of death. When they die, men go not to feed fat the mould, but down into the dust; and there the foot of the living falls silent, and his voice is choked, and the light is thickened and in retreat, as if it were creeping away to die. The only creatures the visitor starts are timid, unclean bats, that flutter and whisper about him like the ghosts of the dead. There are no[448] flowers in an Eastern cemetery; and the withered branches and other ornaments are thickly powdered with the same dust that chokes, and silences and darkens all.
If you've seen a graveyard in the East, you'll understand the elements of this imagery, which depicts dust as death and dew as life. In our damp graveyards, mold has become the traditional symbol of death; but where the hot Eastern sun prevents things from rotting into lower forms of life, instead they crumble into dry powder that can't sustain a worm, dust becomes the natural symbol of death. When people die, they don’t nourish the mold but return to the dust; and there, the living's footsteps fall silent, their voices are stifled, and the light dims and retreats as if it's slowly fading away to die. The only creatures that stir are timid, unclean bats, fluttering and whispering around him like the ghosts of the dead. There are no[448] flowers in an Eastern cemetery; and the withered branches and other decorations are thickly coated with the same dust that chokes, silences, and darkens everything.
Hence the Semitic conception of the underworld was dominated by dust. It was not water nor fire nor frost nor altogether darkness, which made the infernal prison horrible, but that upon its floor and rafters, hewn from the roots and ribs of the primeval mountains, dust lay deep and choking. Amid all the horrors he imagined for the dead, Dante did not include one more awful than the horror of dust. The picture which the northern Semites had before them when they turned their faces to the wall was of this kind.[88]
Hence, the Semitic view of the underworld was all about dust. It wasn’t water, fire, frost, or pure darkness that made the infernal prison terrifying, but the deep, suffocating dust covering its floor and beams, carved from the roots and bones of the ancient mountains. Among all the terrors Dante imagined for the dead, he did not conceive of anything worse than the dread of dust. The image that the northern Semites had in mind when they turned their faces to the wall was like this.[88]
The house that men enter but cannot leave.
The path men take, but cannot come back.
The house from which the residents are cut off from light.
The place where dust is their food and clay is their sustenance.
They do not see the light; they live in darkness.
They are dressed like birds, with their wings all fluttering.
The dust is thick on the door and the gateposts.
Either, then, an Eastern sepulchre, or this its infernal double, was gaping before the prophet's eyes. What more final and hopeless than the dust and the dark of it?
Either, then, an Eastern tomb, or its hellish counterpart, was wide open before the prophet's eyes. What could be more final and hopeless than its dust and darkness?
But for dust there is dew, and even to graveyards the morning comes that brings dew and light together. The wonder of dew is that it is given from a clear heaven, and that it comes to sight with the dawn. If the Oriental looks up when dew is falling, he sees nothing to thank for it between him and the stars. If he sees dew in the morning, it is equal liquid and lustre; it seems to distil from the beams of the sun—[449]the sun, which riseth with healing under his wings. The dew is thus doubly "dew of light." But our prophet ascribes the dew of God, that is to raise the dead, neither to stars nor dawn, but, because of its Divine power, to that higher supernal glory which the Hebrews conceived to have existed before the sun, and which they styled, as they styled their God, by the plural of majesty: A dew of lights is Thy dew.[89] As, when the dawn comes, the drooping flowers of yesterday are seen erect and lustrous with the dew, every spike a crown of glory, so also shall be the resurrection of the dead. There is no shadow of a reason for limiting this promise to that to which some other passages of resurrection in the Old Testament have to be limited: a corporate restoration of the holy State or Church. This is the resurrection of its individual members to a community which is already restored, the recovery by Israel of her dead men and women from their separate graves, each with his own freshness and beauty, in that glorious morning when the Sun of righteousness shall arise, with healing under His wings—Thy dew, O Jehovah!
But for dust, there is dew, and even graveyards receive the morning that brings dew and light together. The amazing thing about dew is that it comes from a clear sky and appears with the dawn. If an Eastern person looks up when dew is falling, they see nothing to thank between them and the stars. If they see dew in the morning, it is both liquid and shiny; it seems to come from the sun's rays—[449]the sun, which rises with healing under its wings. The dew is thus doubly "dew of light." But our prophet attributes the dew of God, which raises the dead, not to the stars or dawn, but, because of its Divine power, to that higher supernal glory which the Hebrews believed existed before the sun and referred to using the plural of majesty: A dew of lights is Thy dew.[89] When dawn arrives, the wilting flowers of the previous day stand tall and glistening with dew, each spike a crown of glory, so too will the resurrection of the dead be. There is no reason to limit this promise to what some other passages about resurrection in the Old Testament have been limited to: a collective restoration of the holy State or Church. This is the resurrection of individual members to a community that has already been restored, the recovery by Israel of her dead men and women from their individual graves, each with their own freshness and beauty, in that glorious morning when the Sun of righteousness rises, with healing under His wings—Thy dew, O Jehovah!
Attempts are so often made to trace the hopes of resurrection, which break the prevailing silence of the Old Testament on a future life, to foreign influences experienced in the Exile, that it is well to emphasize the origin and occasion of the hopes that utter themselves so abruptly in this passage. Surely nothing could be more inextricably woven with the national fortunes of Israel, as nothing could be more native and original to Israel's temper, than the verses just expounded. We need not deny that their residence among a people, accustomed as the Babylonians were to belief in the resurrection, may have thawed in the Jews[450] that reserve which the Old Testament clearly shows that they exhibited towards a future life. The Babylonians themselves had received most of their suggestions of the next world from a non-Semitic race; and therefore it would not be to imagine anything alien to the ascertained methods of Providence if we were to suppose that the Hebrews, who showed what we have already called the Semitic want of interest in a future life, were intellectually tempered by their foreign associations to a readiness to receive any suggestions of immortality, which the Spirit of God might offer them through their own religious experience. That it was this last, which was the effective cause of Israel's hopes for the resurrection of her dead, our passage puts beyond doubt. Chap. xxvi. shows us that the occasion of these hopes was what is not often noticed: the returned exiles' disappointment with the meagre repopulation of the holy territory. A restoration of the State or community was not enough: the heart of Israel wanted back in their numbers her dead sons and daughters.
People often try to link the hopes of resurrection, which break the silence of the Old Testament regarding life after death, to foreign influences during the Exile. It's important to highlight the origin and context of these hopes that are expressed so suddenly in this passage. Nothing is more tightly woven into the national fate of Israel, or more inherent to Israel's character, than the verses just discussed. We don’t need to deny that living among a people like the Babylonians, who believed in resurrection, may have softened the Jews' reluctance toward the idea of an afterlife, which is evident in the Old Testament. The Babylonians themselves had taken much of their ideas about the afterlife from a non-Semitic culture. So, it wouldn’t be far-fetched to suggest that the Hebrews, who we previously noted showed a Semitic lack of interest in the afterlife, were intellectually influenced by their foreign interactions to be open to any notions of immortality that the Spirit of God might reveal to them through their own religious experiences. Our passage clearly indicates that it was this latter influence that was the real cause of Israel's hopes for the resurrection of the dead. Chapter xxvi shows that the source of these hopes came from a somewhat overlooked aspect: the disappointment of the returning exiles with the sparse repopulation of the sacred land. A restoration of the state or community wasn’t enough; the heart of Israel longed for the return of its deceased sons and daughters.
If the occasion of these hopes was thus an event in Israel's own national history, and if the impulse to them was given by so natural an instinct of her own heart, Israel was equally indebted to herself for the convictions that the instinct was not in vain. Nothing is more clear in our passage than that Israel's first ground of hope in a future life was her simple, untaught reflection upon the power of her God. Death was His chastening. Death came from Him, and remained in His power. Surely He would deliver from it. This was a very old belief in Israel. The Lord killeth and maketh alive; He bringeth down to Sheol and bringeth up. Such words, of course, might be only an extreme figure for recovery from disease, and the silence of so great a saint as[451] Hezekiah about any other issue into life than by convalescence from mortal sickness staggers us into doubt whether an Israelite ever did think of a resurrection. But still there was Jehovah's almightiness; a man could rest his future on that, even if he had not light to think out what sort of a future it would be. So mark in our passage, how confidence is chiefly derived from the simple utterance of the name of Jehovah, and how He is hailed as our God. It seems enough to the prophet to connect life with Him and to say merely, Thy dew. As death is God's own discipline, so life, Thy dew, is with Him also.
If the source of these hopes was an event in Israel's national history, and if the drive behind them came from a natural instinct of her own heart, Israel was equally reliant on herself for the belief that this instinct was not meaningless. Nothing is clearer in our passage than that Israel's primary basis for hope in an afterlife was her simple, unreflected acknowledgment of her God's power. Death was His chastening. Death came from Him and stayed within His control. Surely, He would rescue from it. This was a very old belief in Israel. The Lord kills and brings to life; He brings down to the grave and raises up. Such words might indeed be only an exaggerated way to speak about recovery from illness, and the silence of such a great saint as [451] Hezekiah regarding any means to life other than recovery from serious illness leaves us questioning whether an Israelite ever really thought about resurrection. But still, there was Jehovah's omnipotence; a person could anchor their future on that, even without clarity on what kind of future that might be. So note in our passage how confidence primarily comes from the simple mention of the name of Jehovah, and how He is called our God. It seems sufficient to the prophet to connect life with Him and simply say, Thy dew. As death is God's own discipline, so life, Thy dew, is also with Him.
Thus in its foundation the Old Testament doctrine of the resurrection is but the conviction of the sufficiency of God Himself, a conviction which Christ turned upon Himself when He said, I am the Resurrection and the Life. Because I live, ye shall live also.
Thus, at its core, the Old Testament teaching about the resurrection is simply the belief in God's adequacy, a belief that Christ applied to Himself when He said, I am the Resurrection and the Life. Because I live, you will live also.
If any object that in this picture of a resurrection we have no real persuasion of immortality, but simply the natural, though impossible, wish of a bereaved people that their dead should to-day rise from their graves to share to-day's return and glory—a revival as special and extraordinary as that appearing of the dead in the streets of Jerusalem when the Atonement was accomplished, but by no means that general resurrection at the last day which is an article of the Christian faith—if any one should bring this objection, then let him be referred to the previous promise of immortality in chap. xxv. The universal and final character of the promise made there is as evident as of that for which Paul borrowed its terms in order to utter the absolute consequences of the resurrection of the Son of God: Death is swallowed up in victory. For the prophet, having in ver. 6 described the restoration of the people, whom exile had[452] starved with a famine of ordinances, to a feast in Zion of fat things and wines on the lees well refined, intimates that as certainly as exile has been abolished, with its dearth of spiritual intercourse, so certainly shall God Himself destroy death: And He shall swallow up in this mountain—perhaps it is imagined, as the sun devours the morning mist on the hills—the mask of the veil, the veil that is upon all the peoples, and the film spun upon all the nations. He hath swallowed up death for ever, and the Lord Jehovah shall wipe away tears from off all faces, and the reproach of His people shall He remove from off all the earth, for Jehovah hath spoken it. And they shall say in that day, Behold, this is our God: we have waited for Him, and He shall save us; this is Jehovah: we have waited for Him; we will rejoice and be glad in His salvation. Thus over all doubts, and in spite of universal human experience, the prophet depends for immortality on God Himself. In chap. xxvi. 3 our version beautifully renders, Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace whose mind is stayed on Thee, because he trusteth in Thee. This is a confidence valid for the next life as well as for this. Therefore trust ye in the Lord for ever. Amen.
If anyone thinks that in this picture of resurrection we have no real belief in immortality, but just the natural, though impossible, hope of grieving people that their loved ones should rise from their graves today to share in today's joy and glory—like the unusual event when the dead appeared in the streets of Jerusalem after the Atonement—but definitely not the general resurrection at the end of time, which is a key belief in Christianity—then let them be referred to the earlier promise of immortality in chapter 25. The universal and final nature of the promise made there is as clear as the one Paul used to express the absolute implications of the resurrection of the Son of God: Death is swallowed up in victory. The prophet, after describing in verse 6 the restoration of the people who had been starved by exile's lack of spiritual resources, to a feast in Zion of rich food and well-aged wine, suggests that just as clearly as exile has ended, bringing back spiritual connection, so certainly will God Himself destroy death: And He shall swallow up in this mountain—like the sun consuming the morning mist on the hills—the mask of the veil, the veil that is upon all the peoples, and the film spun upon all the nations. He has swallowed up death forever, and the Lord Jehovah will wipe away tears from all faces, and He will remove the disgrace of His people from all the earth, for Jehovah has spoken. And they will say in that day, Look, this is our God: we have waited for Him, and He will save us; this is Jehovah: we have waited for Him; we will rejoice and be glad in His salvation. Thus, despite all doubts and the universal human experience, the prophet relies on God Himself for immortality. In chapter 26, verse 3, our version beautifully states, Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace whose mind is stayed on Thee, because he trusteth in Thee. This confidence is valid for both this life and the next. Therefore trust ye in the Lord forever. Amen.
Almighty God, we praise Thee that, in the weakness of all our love and the darkness of all our knowledge before death, Thou hast placed assurance of eternal life in simple faith upon Thyself. Let this faith be richly ours. By Thine omnipotence, by Thy righteousness, by the love Thou hast vouchsafed, we lift ourselves and rest upon Thy word. Because I live, ye shall live also. Oh keep us steadfast in union with Thyself, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
Almighty God, we praise You for placing the assurance of eternal life in simple faith in You, despite our limited love and understanding of death. May this faith be abundant in our lives. By Your power, by Your righteousness, and by the love You've granted us, we raise ourselves and rely on Your word. Because I live, you shall live also. Oh, keep us firm in our connection with You, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
INDEX TO CHAPS. I.-XXXIX.
Chapters of | Date B.C. | Chapters of the |
Isaiah. | Introduction. | |
i. | 701 | I., XIX., p. 311 ff. |
ii.-iv. | 740-735 | II. |
v. | 735 | III. |
vi. | 740; written 735 or 727 | IV., XXVI., 391 f. |
vii.-ix. 7 | 734-732 | VI. |
vii. 14 ff. | 734 | VII. 133 |
viii. | 734-733 | VII. 135 |
ix. 1-7 | 732 | VII. 136 |
ix. 8-x. 4 | 735 | III. 47 ff. |
x. 5-34 | About 721 | IX. 147 |
xi. [xii.] | About 720? | X. |
xi. 1-6 | VII. 138 | |
xiii.-xiv. 23 | ? | XXVII. |
xiv. 24-27 | Towards 701 | XVII. 272 |
xiv. 28-32 | 705 | XVII. 272 |
xv.-xvi. 12 | ? | XVII. 273 |
xvi. 13, 14 | 711 or 704? | XVII. 273 |
xvii. 1-11 | Between 736 and 732 | XVII. 274 |
xvii. 12-14 | ? | XVII. 274, 277, 281 f. |
xviii. | 711 or towards 701? | XVII. 275 |
xix. | 703 or after 700? | XVII. 275, 278, 284 ff. |
xx. | 711-709 | XI. 198-200, XVII. 276 |
xxi. 1-10 | Probably 709 | XI. 201, XVII. 276 |
xxi. 11, 12 | Between 704 and 701 | XVII. 276 |
xxi. 13, 17 | XVII. 277 | |
xxii. | 701 | XIX., XX. |
xxiii. | 703 or 702 | XVII. 277, XVIII. |
xxiv. | ? | XXVIII. |
xxv.-xxvii. | ? | XXIX.-XXX. |
xxviii. | About 725 | VIII. 149 |
xxix.-xxxii. | p. 207 | |
[454]xxix. | About 703 | XII. |
xxx. | About 702 | XIII. |
xxxi. | About 702 | XIV. |
xxxii. 1-8 | About 702? | XV. |
xxxii. 9-20 | Date uncertain | XVI. |
xxxiii. | 701 | XX., XXI., 207, 304 |
xxxiv. | ? | XXIX. 438 ff. |
xxxv. | ? | XXIX. 440 f. |
xxxvi. 1 | 701 | 303 f. |
xxxvi. 2-xxxvii. | 701 | 303 f. |
xxxvi. 2-22 | 701 | XXII. 303 f. |
xxxvii. | 701 | XXIII. |
xxxviii.-xxxix. | Date uncertain | XXV. 304 |
xxxviii. | XXVI. 393 | |
xxxix. | XI. 201 |
SHORT INDEX OF SUBJECTS.
compared to Charles I., __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ ff., __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
Judas from the Old Testament, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Animals, the lower, 190 ff.;
our mediation to, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Anthropomorphism, 144.
Arabia, 277.
Aram, 94, 103 ff.
Ashdod, 198.
Assyria and Assyrians, 53, 92 f., 95, 97, 103 f., 122, and passim.
Atheism, two kinds of, 172 ff.
Babylon, 93, 201, 405.
Babylonian captivity, 201, 402.
Bribery, 47.
Captivity of Israel, first, 128;
second, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Christ, 80, 142 ff., 254 ff., 328, 426.
Church, origin of idea of, 126.
Commerce, 296.
Conscience, 6;
its threefold nature, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
simplicity, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Cromwell, 160 ff., 220.
Damascus, 95, 120, 122, 274.
Drunkenness, 44 f., 152 ff.
Earthquake, 50.
Edom, 94, 276, 438 ff.
Egypt, 92, 96, 197 ff., 222 ff., passim.
Ekron, 308 f.
Eliakim, 317.
Ethiopia, 93, 222, 275.
Faith, moral results of, 106 f., 163 f.;
power to shape history, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ ff.
Fatalism, 110.
Forgiveness of sin, 13, 71 ff., 326 ff., 361, 381.
Formalism, 216, 240.
Free-will, 82.
Glory, 68.
Hamath, 94.
Heine, 158, 242, 413.
Hezekiah, 352, 378 ff., passim.
Holiness, 63 ff.
Holy Spirit, 185-188.
Immanuel, 102, 115, 124 ff., 133 ff.
Immortality, 385 ff., 394 ff., 410, 444 ff.
Individual, the, and the community, 389 ff.
Inspiration, 23 ff., 213, 372.
Isaiah:
internship, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
youth, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
a son of Jerusalem, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
three-part vision, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
idealist, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
realist, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
prophet, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Patriotism, an awareness of his country’s wrongdoings, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ f.;
call and consecration, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ ff.;
personality, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ f., __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
compared to Mazzini, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
with Moses, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
contribution to the religious development of Israel, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
not a fatalist, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
habit of reaching out to the public, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
saved from the trending drift, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
disdain, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
sanity, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ f., __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__;
compared to Cromwell, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ ff., __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
self-control, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
respect for animals, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
[456]walks undressed for a sign, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
inspiration, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
working of his imagination, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
style, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
humanity, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
triumph, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ ff.;
imagination and conscience, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
timeless lesson, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
contrasted with Crusaders, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
personal faith, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
perfect, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
satire, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
Israel, religious condition, 99;
and Greece, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Jerusalem, 22, 25 ff., 169 f., 211 f., 231 f., 243, 267 f., 279, Book IV., passim.
"King Lear," 49, 55.
Land question, 41 ff.
Language, abuse of, 260.
Maher-shalal-hash-baz, 120.
Mazzini, 84-86.
Merodach-baladan, 200, 376.
Messiah, 89, 90, 115 ff., 129, 131-144, 180 ff., 249.
Moab, 94, 273.
Monotheism, moral and political advantages, 108-110;
growth in Israel, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Name of the Lord, 233 ff.
Nature, fourfold use of by the prophets, 16 f.;
redemption of __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
destruction of, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ etc.
Palestine, 92.
People, the, ultimately responsible, 119, 198, 224 ff.
Philistines, 94, 272.
Phœnicia, 94, 96, 288 ff.
Poetry, Hebrew, 411.
Polytheism, 99, 107.
Preaching the word, 82, 83.
Prophecy, its power of vision, 23-25;
its service to religion, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ f.
Providence, 98.
Rabshakeh, the, 343 ff.
Remnant, the, 31, 87, 101, 126, 129, and passim.
Resurrection, 387, 444 ff.
Return from exile, 195, 401 ff., 429, 440 f., 450.
Righteousness, Isaiah's doctrine of, 334 ff.
Sacrament, an Old Testament, 74.
Samaria, 95, 147, 152 ff.
Sargon, 148, 169, 198 ff.
Scepticism, 15.
Sennacherib, 209, 302, 308 ff., 355 ff.
Serbonian bog, 361.
Shebna, 317.
Sheol, 385, 410, 447 ff.
Shiloah, 122.
Sin, 52, 69, passim;
effect on man's material situation, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Sorrow, man's abuse of, 54.
Tiglath-pileser II., 96, 103 f.
Uzziah, 59 f., 98.
War, 51.
Women, Isaiah to, 262.
Wrath of God, 47 f., 55.
Printed by Hazell, Watson & Viney, Ld., London and Aylesbury.
Printed by Hazell, Watson & Viney, Ltd., London and Aylesbury.
THE EXPOSITOR'S BIBLE.
Crown 8vo, cloth, price 7s. 6d. each vol.
Crown 8vo, cloth, price £7.50 each vol.
First Series.
First Series.
Colossians.
By the Rev. A. Maclaren, D.D., D.Lit.
St. Mark.
By the Right Rev. the Bishop of Derry.
Genesis.
By Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D.
1 Samuel.
By Prof. W. G. Blaikie, D.D.
2 Samuel.
By the same Author.
Hebrews.
By Principal T. C. Edwards, D.D.
Colossians.
By Rev. A. Maclaren, D.D., D.Lit.
St. Mark.
By Right Rev. the Bishop of Derry.
Genesis.
By Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D.
1 Samuel.
By Prof. W.G. Blaikie, D.D.
2 Samuel.
By the same Author.
Hebrews.
By Principal T.C. Edwards, D.D.
Second Series.
Second Series.
Galatians.
By Prof. G. G. Findlay, B.A., D.D.
The Pastoral Epistles.
By the Rev. A. Plummer, D.D.
Isaiah I.—XXXIX.
By Prin. G. A. Smith, D.D. Vol. I.
The Book of Revelation.
By Prof. W. Milligan, D.D.
1 Corinthians.
By Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D.
The Epistles of St. John.
By the Most Rev. the Archbishop of Armagh.
Galatians.
By Prof. G. G. Findlay, B.A., D.D.
The Pastoral Epistles.
By Rev. A. Plummer, D.D.
Isaiah I.—39.
By Prin. G.A. Smith, D.D. Vol. I.
The Book of Revelation.
By Prof. W. Milligan, D.D.
1 Corinthians.
By Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D.
The Epistles of St. John.
By the Most Rev. the Archbishop of Armagh.
Third Series.
Third Series.
Judges and Ruth.
By the Rev. R. A. Watson, M.A., D.D.
Jeremiah.
By the Rev. C. J. Ball, M.A.
Isaiah XL.—LXVI.
By Prin. G. A. Smith, D.D. Vol. II.
St. Matthew.
By the Rev. J. Monro Gibson, D.D.
Exodus.
By the Right Rev. the Bishop of Derry.
St. Luke.
By the Rev. H. Burton, M.A.
Judges and Ruth.
By Rev. R. A. Watson, M.A., D.D.
Jeremiah.
By Rev. C.J. Ball, M.A.
Isaiah XL.—LXVI.
By Prin. G.A. Smith, D.D. Vol. II.
St. Matthew.
By Rev. J. Monro Gibson, D.D.
Exodus.
By the Right Rev. the Bishop of Derry.
St. Luke.
By Rev. H. Burton, M.A.
Fourth Series.
Fourth Series.
Ecclesiastes.
By the Rev. Samuel Cox, D.D.
St. James and St. Jude.
By the Rev. A. Plummer, D.D.
Proverbs.
By the Rev. R. F. Horton, D.D.
Leviticus.
By the Rev. S. H. Kellogg, D.D.
The Gospel of St. John.
By Prof. M. Dods, D.D. Vol. I.
The Acts of the Apostles.
By Prof. Stokes, D.D. Vol. I.
Ecclesiastes.
By Rev. Samuel Cox, D.D.
St. James and St. Jude.
By Rev. A. Plummer, D.D.
Proverbs.
By Rev. R.F. Horton, D.D.
Leviticus.
By Rev. S.H. Kellogg, D.D.
The Gospel of St. John.
By Prof. M. Dods, D.D. Vol. I.
The Acts of the Apostles.
By Prof. Stokes, D.D. Vol. I.
Fifth Series.
Fifth Series.
The Psalms.
By the Rev. A. Maclaren, D.D. Vol. I.
1 and 2 Thessalonians.
By Prof. James Denney, D.D.
The Book of Job.
By the Rev. R. A. Watson, M.A., D.D.
Ephesians.
By Prof. G. G. Findlay, B.A., D.D.
The Gospel of St. John.
By Prof. M. Dods, D.D. Vol. II.
The Acts of the Apostles.
By Prof. Stokes, D.D. Vol. II.
The Psalms.
By Rev. A. Maclaren, D.D. Vol. I.
1 and 2 Thessalonians.
By Prof. James Denney, D.D.
The Book of Job.
By Rev. R.A. Watson, M.A., D.D.
Ephesians.
By Prof. G.G. Findlay, B.A., D.D.
The Gospel of St. John.
By Prof. M. Dods, D.D. Vol. II.
The Acts of the Apostles.
By Prof. Stokes, D.D. Vol. II.
Sixth Series.
Sixth Series.
1 Kings.
By the Very Rev. F. W. Farrar, F.R.S.
Philippians.
By Principal Rainy, D.D.
Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther.
By Prof. W. F. Adeney, M.A.
Joshua.
By Prof. W. G. Blaikie, D.D.
The Psalms.
By the Rev. A. Maclaren, D.D. Vol. II.
The Epistles of St. Peter.
By Prof. Rawson Lumby, D.D.
1 Kings.
By the Very Rev. F.W. Farrar, F.R.S.
Philippians.
By Principal Rainy day, D.D.
Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther.
By Prof. W.F. Adeney, M.A.
Joshua.
By Prof. W.G. Blaikie, D.D.
The Psalms.
By the Rev. A. Maclaren, D.D. Vol. II.
The Epistles of St. Peter.
By Prof. Rawson Lumby, D.D.
Seventh Series.
Season Seven.
2 Kings.
By the Very Rev. F. W. Farrar, F.R.S.
Romans.
By the Right Rev. H. C. G. Moule, D.D.
The Books of Chronicles.
By Prof. W. H. Bennett, D.D., D.Lit.
2 Corinthians.
By Prof. James Denney, D.D.
Numbers.
By the Rev. R. A. Watson, M.A., D.D.
The Psalms.
By the Rev. A. Maclaren, D.D. Vol. III.
2 Kings.
By the Very Rev. F.W. Farrar, F.R.S.
Romans.
By the Right Rev. H.C.G. Moule, D.D.
The Books of Chronicles.
By Prof. W. H. Bennett, D.D., D.Lit.
2 Corinthians.
By Prof. James Denney, D.D.
Numbers.
By the Rev. R.A. Watson, M.A., D.D.
The Psalms.
By the Rev. A. Maclaren, D.D. Vol. III.
Eighth Series.
Eighth Series.
Daniel.
By the Very Rev. F. W. Farrar, F.R.S.
The Book of Jeremiah.
By Prof. W. H. Bennett, D.D., D.Lit.
Deuteronomy.
By Prof. Andrew Harper, B.D.
The Song of Solomon and Lamentations.
By Prof. W. F. Adeney, M.A.
Ezekiel.
By Prof. John Skinner, M.A.
The Books of the Twelve Prophets.
By Prin. G. A. Smith, D.D. Two Vols.
Daniel.
By the Very Rev. F. W. Farrar, F.R.S.
The Book of Jeremiah.
By Prof. W. H. Bennett, D.D., D.Lit.
Deuteronomy.
By Prof. Andrew Harper, B.D.
The Song of Solomon and Lamentations.
By Prof. W.F. Adeney, M.A.
Ezekiel.
By Prof. John Skinner, M.A.
The Books of the Twelve Prophets.
By Prin. G.A. Smith, D.D. Two Vols.
WORKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR.
Crown 8vo, cloth, price 7s. 6d.
Crown 8vo, hardcover, price £7.50.
VOLUME II.
VOLUME 2.
THE BOOK OF ISAIAH.
Chaps. XL.-LXVI.
Chapters XL.-LXVI.
Rev. Dr. Marcus Dods, in The British Weekly, says: "That criticism so keen and so well principled should co-exist with a historical sense so fully developed as Mr. Smith's, is perhaps not so wonderful as that both these high and useful faculties should seem not to overwhelm and smother, but rather to stimulate and find opportunity for the faculty of dramatic presentation, for the magical English style, and, above all, for the singular spiritual insight which this volume exhibits."
Rev. Dr. Marcus Dods, in The British Weekly, says: "It's maybe not so surprising that sharp and principled criticism can exist alongside a well-developed historical perspective like Mr. Smith's. What’s truly remarkable is that these strong and valuable skills don't drown out the ability for dramatic presentation or the captivating English style. Instead, they encourage and create space for the unique spiritual insight that this volume shows."
Rev. Dr. Beet says: "The first volume of Smith's Isaiah took us all by surprise, and revealed the advent of an expositor of the first rank. The high standard thus set up is fully maintained in the second volume. Indeed, as dealing with more difficult topics it increases greatly our respect for the author. We have accurate Hebrew scholarship, keen insight into the life and thought of Isaiah's day, and devout appreciation of the abiding spiritual worth of this ancient prophecy presented in a form intelligible and attractive to all."
Rev. Dr. Beet says: "The first volume of Smith's Isaiah took us all by surprise and introduced us to a top-notch interpreter. The high standard set in that volume is fully maintained in the second one. In fact, as it tackles more challenging topics, it greatly increases our admiration for the author. We see precise Hebrew scholarship, sharp insight into the life and ideas of Isaiah's time, and a heartfelt appreciation for the lasting spiritual significance of this ancient prophecy, all presented in a way that is understandable and appealing to everyone."
The Record. "Mr. Smith is a sound and thoroughly capable Hebrew scholar, and he has written in these volumes an exposition of Isaiah which every scholarly teacher and every conscientious expounder of the evangelical prophet, even though he may differ from Mr. Smith upon occasion, ought to possess."
The Record. "Mr. Smith is a knowledgeable and highly skilled Hebrew scholar, and he has written in these volumes an analysis of Isaiah that every academic teacher and every dedicated interpreter of the evangelical prophet, even if they may occasionally disagree with Mr. Smith, should have."
The Academy. "It is needless to mention the literary merits which in reviews of the first volume of this work were so abundantly recognised. This is, indeed, one of the few theological books which it is a pure pleasure to read; nor need one, in the case of the present volume, add the qualifying remark that the homiletical element is somewhat unduly large. The scholarship too, is still as accurate as might be expected from Mr. Smith's excellent training."
The Academy. "It's unnecessary to point out the literary qualities that were widely acknowledged in reviews of the first volume of this work. This is genuinely one of the few theological books that is a true pleasure to read; and in the case of this volume, there's no need to add the comment that the homiletical aspect is somewhat exaggerated. The scholarship is still as precise as you'd expect from Mr. Smith's outstanding training."
The Independent: "It is in every way a notable book, and will even add to the now established reputation of its author among Old Testament students. The two volumes taken together constitute one of the most successful attempts ever made to expound an Old Testament book in the light of modern research. Mr. Smith has here shown something of the power of criticism to do constructive work, and has made it abundantly evident that some, at least, of the recent critical results may be used with most illuminating and inspiring effect."
The Independent: "This is an impressive book that will further enhance its author's established reputation among Old Testament scholars. Together, the two volumes represent one of the most effective efforts to explain an Old Testament book through the lens of modern research. Mr. Smith has demonstrated the constructive potential of criticism and made it clear that some of the recent critical findings can be applied in a highly enlightening and inspiring way."
London: HODDER & STOUGHTON.
London: Hodder & Stoughton.
WORKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR.
Crown 8vo, cloth, price 7s. 6d.
Crown 8vo, hardcover, price £7.50.
THE HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY
OF THE HOLY LAND.
Especially in Relation to the History of Israel and of the Early Church.
Especially in relation to the history of Israel and the early Church.
"In some respects the book is the most comprehensive and complete contribution to Palestinian literature of the last twenty years.... In English, at least, there is no book from which the reader can carry away in his mind's eye so clear, connected, and permanent a picture of Palestine as from Dr. Smith's."—Daily News.
"In some ways, this book is the most thorough and complete contribution to Palestinian literature in the last twenty years.... At least in English, there isn't another book that gives readers such a clear, cohesive, and lasting image of Palestine as Dr. Smith's."—Daily News.
"A very noteworthy contribution to the study of sacred history, based upon the three indispensable conditions of personal acquaintance with the land, a study of the explorations, discoveries, and decipherments, especially of the last twenty years, and the employment of the results of Biblical criticism during the same period. The necessity and importance of such an undertaking need no demonstration, and the results as set forth in Dr. Smith's learned and laborious work will be appreciated by all competent scholars."—Times.
"A significant contribution to the study of sacred history, based on three essential factors: personal familiarity with the land, an examination of the explorations, discoveries, and decipherments from the last twenty years, and the use of insights from Biblical criticism during that same time. The necessity and importance of this endeavor speak for themselves, and the findings presented in Dr. Smith's detailed and scholarly work will be valued by all knowledgeable scholars."—Times.
"It is not often that we have to review a book so thorough and so masterly, and, at the same time, written in a style which commands attention as well as admiration.... It contains and 'uses' the important parts of all the immense mass of modern research and discovery, enriched and illuminated by a mind of imagination and poetry, as well as scholarship."—Saturday Review.
"It’s not often that we come across a book that is so thorough and expertly done, while also being written in a style that grabs your attention and admiration.... It includes and 'uses' the key aspects of all the vast amount of modern research and discoveries, enhanced and illuminated by a creative and poetic mind, in addition to its scholarship."—Saturday Review.
"This is really a great book. A subject of fascinating interest has been treated with an ability and a fulness which leave nothing to be desired."—Westminster Gazette.
"This is really a great book. The topic is incredibly interesting and has been covered with such skill and depth that there's nothing more one could ask for."—Westminster Gazette.
London: HODDER & STOUGHTON.
London: HODDER & STOUGHTON.
WORKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR.
FOUR PSALMS.
Cloth, 1s. 6d.
Cloth, £1.50.
"These expositions are in every way admirable, and worthy of the highest admiration."—Aberdeen Free Press.
"These presentations are truly impressive and deserve the highest praise."—Aberdeen Free Press.
"Very choice expositions in a deeply spiritual vein. Learning, genius, and grace combine to make these four choice psalms more precious than ever."—Baptist.
"Highly impressive interpretations with a deeply spiritual tone. Knowledge, creativity, and elegance come together to make these four special psalms more valuable than ever." —Baptist.
MODERN CRITICISM
AND PREACHING OF THE OLD
TESTAMENT.
Crown 8vo, cloth, 6s.
Crown 8vo, cloth, £6.
Dr. Robertson Nicoll says in The British Weekly: "Dr. George Adam Smith has given us a fresh, brilliant, Christian book on a vital subject. In some respects it is perhaps on an even higher level than anything else he has written. It would be impertinent in us to speak of the scholarship shown everywhere. Dr. Smith is as accurate as he is brilliant. There are many evidences not only of his scholarship, but of the wide range his reading has covered. The book is written throughout with marked distinction, and in a high and generous spirit. It is anything but a mere résumé. It is full of originality and suggestiveness, and is alive and challenging from end to end. It is as powerful and ardent as anything Dr. Smith has written, and it is also spiritual and subtle."
Dr. Robertson Nicoll says in The British Weekly: "Dr. George Adam Smith has given us a fresh, brilliant Christian book on a vital topic. In some ways, it might even be at a higher level than anything else he has written. It would be rude for us to comment on the scholarship demonstrated throughout. Dr. Smith is as accurate as he is brilliant. There are many signs not only of his scholarship but also of the broad range his reading has covered. The book is written with notable distinction and in a high and generous spirit. It’s far from a simple résumé. It is full of originality and thought-provoking ideas, and it’s engaging and challenging from start to finish. It is as powerful and passionate as anything Dr. Smith has written, while also being spiritual and nuanced."
THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS.
Crown 8vo, cloth, 6s.
Crown 8vo, cloth, £6.
JERUSALEM.
In Two Volumes. Net, 24s.
In Two Volumes. $24.
THE
LIFE OF HENRY DRUMMOND,
F.R.S.E.
With Portrait. Cloth, 3s. 6d.
With Portrait. Cloth, £3.50.
"A very large audience may safely be predicted for his biography. The work is well done.... A more devote life has rarely been portrayed, a cleaner soul has not often been unveiled."—Spectator.
"A very large audience can definitely be expected for his biography. The work is well done.... A more devoted life has rarely been depicted, and a cleaner soul hasn’t often been revealed."—Spectator.
London: HODDER & STOUGHTON
London: HODDER & STOUGHTON
WORKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR.
THE BOOK OF THE TWELVE
PROPHETS.
Commonly called the Minor.
In Two Volumes. Crown 8vo, cloth, 7s. 6d. each.
Vol. I.—Amos, Hosea and Micah.
Commonly referred to as the Minor.
In Two Volumes. Crown 8vo, cloth, £7.50 each.
Vol. I — Amos, Hosea, Micah.
Vol. II.—Zephaniah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Obadiah, Haggai, Zechariah I.-VIII., "Malachi," Joel, "Zechariah" IX.-XIV., and Jonah.
Vol. II.—Zephaniah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Obadiah, Haggai, Zechariah I-VIII, "Malachi," Joel, "Zechariah" IX-XIV, and Jonah.
"In Dr. Smith's volumes we have much more than a popular exposition of the minor Prophets. We have that which will satisfy the scholar and the student quite as much as the person who reads for pleasure and for edification.... If the minor Prophets do not become popular reading it is not because anything more can be done to make them attractive. Dr. Smith's volumes present this part of Scripture in what is at once the most attractive and the most profitable form."—Dr. Marcus Dods in the British Weekly.
"In Dr. Smith's books, we find much more than just a simple explanation of the minor Prophets. They offer something that will please both scholars and students as much as those who read for enjoyment and personal growth. If the minor Prophets aren't popular reads, it's not due to a lack of effort to make them appealing. Dr. Smith's works present this section of Scripture in the most engaging and beneficial way possible."—Dr. Marcus Dods in the British Weekly.
"By his two volumes on Isaiah, and that preceding the present one of the Prophets, Professor Smith gave abundant evidence both of his Hebrew scholarship and his capacity as an expositor of Scripture, ... and he has now put us under fresh obligations by publishing this volume, which in no respect falls behind its predecessors."—Scotsman.
"Through his two volumes on Isaiah and the one before this on the Prophets, Professor Smith has shown plenty of evidence of his Hebrew expertise and his skill in explaining Scripture, ... and he has now given us more reasons to be grateful by releasing this volume, which is just as impressive as the ones before it."—Scotsman.
"The volume which completes the great enterprise is one of the best."—Methodist Times.
"The volume that finishes this great project is one of the best."—Methodist Times.
"The volume altogether, in its accurate scholarship, its vivid descriptions, its bold and candid treatment of difficulties, and its fulness of reference to the labours of other critics of every school, forms not only one of the most brilliant of the series, but one of the foremost of British contributions to the literature of its special subject."—Christian World.
"The book, with its thorough research, lively descriptions, straightforward approach to challenges, and extensive references to the works of other critics from various backgrounds, is not just one of the most outstanding in the series, but also ranks among the top British contributions to the literature on its specific topic."—Christian World.
London: HODDER & STOUGHTON.
London: Hodder & Stoughton.
THE SECOND VOLUME
OF
OF
THE EXPOSITOR'S GREEK
TESTAMENT.
EDITED BY THE REV. W. ROBERTSON NICOLL,
M.A., LL.D.
Editor of the Expositor, Expositor's Bible, etc.
CONTAINING
EDITED BY THE REV. W. ROBERTSON NICOLL,
M.A., LL.D.
Editor of the Expositor, Expositor's Bible, etc.
CONTAINING
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES.
By the Rev. Professor R. J. Knowling, D.D., Vice-Principal of
King's College, London.
By the Rev. Professor R.J. Knowling, D.D., Vice-Principal of
King's College, London.
THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS.
By the Rev. Professor James Denney, D.D.
By Rev. Prof. James Denney, D.D.
THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE
CORINTHIANS.
By the Rev. Professor G. G. Findlay, B.A., D.D.
By Rev. Professor G.G. Findlay, B.A., D.D.
THE THIRD VOLUME, CONTAINING
THE THIRD VOLUME, INCLUDING
THE SECOND EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS.
By the Very Rev. Dean Bernard, D.D.
By the Very Rev. Dean Bernard, D.D.
THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS.
By the Rev. Frederic Rendall, M.A.
By Rev. Frederic Rendall, M.A.
THE EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS.
By the Rev. Principal Salmond, D.D.
By Rev. Principal Salmond, D.D.
THE EPISTLE TO THE PHILIPPIANS.
By the Rev. H. A. A. Kennedy, D.Sc.
By Rev. H. A. A. Kennedy, D.Sc.
THE EPISTLE TO THE COLOSSIANS.
By the Rev. Professor A. S. Peake, M.A.
By Rev. Professor A. S. Peake, M.A.
The price of each volume is 28s. Volumes I. and II. may still be had at subscription price, viz. 30s.
The price of each volume is 28 shillings. Volumes I and II are still available at the subscription price of 30 shillings.
Those who have subscribed for Volumes I. and II. may have Volume III. on payment of 15s.
Anyone who has subscribed to Volumes I and II can get Volume III for 15s.
London: HODDER & STOUGHTON.
London: Hodder & Stoughton.
THE FIRST VOLUME
OF
THE EXPOSITOR'S GREEK
TESTAMENT.
EDITED BY THE REV. W. ROBERTSON NICOLL,
M.A., LL.D.
Editor of the Expositor, Expositor's Bible, etc.
EDITED BY REV. W. ROBERTSON NICOLL,
M.A., LL.D.
Editor of the Expositor, Expositor's Bible, etc.
The First Volume, of 880 pages, handsomely bound in buckram cloth, consists of the Gospels of St. Matthew, St. Mark, and St. Luke by the Rev. Professor A. B. Bruce, D.D., and the Gospel of St. John by the Rev. Professor Marcus Dods, D.D.
The First Volume, with 880 pages, nicely bound in buckram cloth, includes the Gospels of St. Matthew's, St. Mark's, and St. Luke by Rev. Professor A. B. Bruce, D.D., and the Gospel of St. Johns by Rev. Professor Marcus Dods, D.D.
The Price of each volume is 28s; but for those who Pay in
Advance the price for two volumes is 30s.
The price of each volume is 28 shillings; however, for those who Pay in
Advance, the price for two volumes is 30 shillings.
FROM PRESS NOTICES OF VOLUME I.
"Dr. Bruce's commentary on the Synoptics is a notable piece of work. It is cheering and refreshing to find these books, with which our inner life is so closely bound up, treated frankly and honestly, as well as adequately for English readers, and withal in so believing and reverent a spirit that the treatment need not repel the most orthodox.... All is set forth with great frankness and admirable common sense, and often in racy language, not without an occasional Scottish flavour."—Athenæum.
"Dr. Bruce's commentary on the Synoptics is an impressive work. It's uplifting and refreshing to see these books, which are so closely connected to our inner lives, being treated openly and honestly, and in a way that is accessible for English readers. It’s done in a spirit of faith and respect that shouldn't alienate the most traditional believers. Everything is presented with great honesty and practical sense, often in lively language that sometimes has a hint of Scottish flair."—Athenæum.
"The first thing that strikes one when he takes up the volume on the Gospels is the uncommon handsomeness of the book. It is a joy to handle it and look into its pages. It is the very book to lure a student into reading. The form is so superb, the paper so choice and so light, the margins so delightfully broad, the type so clear and so tasteful.... The two scholars to whom this volume has been committed are the very men for the work. Each is a master of his subject, and each has gone into his task con amore.... A work worthy of the most cordial appreciation."—Critical Review.
"The first thing that stands out when you pick up the book on the Gospels is its striking beauty. It’s a pleasure to hold and flip through its pages. It’s the perfect book to entice a student into reading. The design is excellent, the paper is high quality and light, the margins are pleasantly wide, and the print is clear and stylish.... The two scholars responsible for this volume are the perfect choice for the job. Each is an expert in his field, and both have approached their work with great enthusiasm.... A project deserving of the highest praise."—Critical Review.
London: HODDER & STOUGHTON.
London: HODDER & STOUGHTON.
WORKS BY THE REV. A. M. FAIRBAIRN,
M.A., D.D., LL.D.,
Principal of Mansfield College, Oxford.
Crown 8vo, cloth, 7s. 6d.
Principal of Mansfield College, Oxford.
Crown 8vo, cloth, £7.50.
CATHOLICISM—ROMAN AND
ANGLICAN.
"Dr. Fairbairn's able and striking volume.... The treatment is throughout so thoughtful and free from narrow polemical bias."—Times.
"Dr. Fairbairn's skillful and impressive book.... The approach is consistently thoughtful and free from narrow argumentative bias."—Times.
"The book is certainly one every theologian must welcome—high-minded in tone, broad in its outlook, penetrating in its vision, and full of luminous apercus on the history of thought and of events."—Literature.
"The book is definitely one that every theologian should appreciate—elevated in tone, expansive in its perspective, insightful in its vision, and filled with bright insights about the history of ideas and events."—Literature.
Crown 8vo, cloth, 3s. 6d.
Crown 8vo, hardcover, £3.50.
RELIGION IN HISTORY AND IN
MODERN LIFE.
Together with an Essay on the Church and the
Working Classes.
Together with an Essay on the Church and the
Working Classes.
"In its new dress, 'Religion in History' is a timely and weighty contribution to a subject with which theologians but too seldom venture to grapple."—Scotsman.
"In its updated format, 'Religion in History' is a relevant and significant contribution to a topic that theologians rarely take on." —Scotsman.
"It is one of the best pieces of work which even Principal Fairbairn has ever done."—Aberdeen Free Press.
"It is one of the best pieces of work that Principal Fairbairn has ever done."—Aberdeen Free Press.
8vo, cloth, 12s.
8vo, cloth, £12.
THE PLACE OF CHRIST IN
MODERN THEOLOGY.
"His work is, without doubt, one of the most valuable and comprehensive contributions to theology that has been made during this generation."—The Spectator.
"His work is definitely one of the most important and thorough contributions to theology that has been made in this generation."—The Spectator.
"A more vivid summary of church history has never been given. With its swift characterisation of schools and politics, with its subtle tracings of the development of various tendencies through the influence of their invironment, of reaction, and of polemic; with its contrasts of different systems, philosophies, and races; with its portraits of men; with its sense of progress and revolt—this part of Dr. Fairbairn's book is no mere annal, but drama, vivid and full of motion, representative of the volume and sweep of Christianity through the centuries."—The Speaker.
"A more vivid summary of church history has never been presented. With its quick depiction of schools and politics, its nuanced exploration of how various movements were shaped by their environment, reactions, and debates; its contrasts between different systems, philosophies, and cultures; its portrayals of individuals; and its sense of progress and rebellion—this section of Dr. Fairbairn's book is not just a record, but a dynamic and engaging drama, capturing the breadth and impact of Christianity throughout the centuries."—The Speaker.
London: HODDER & STOUGHTON.
London: HODDER & STOUGHTON.
WORKS BY SIR W. M. RAMSAY, D.C.L., LL.D.,
WORKS BY SIR W. M. RAMSAY, D.C.L., LL.D.,
Professor of Humanity in the University of Aberdeen, and
Hon. Fellow of Exeter and Lincoln Colleges, Oxford.
8vo, cloth, with Map, 10s. 6d.
Professor of Humanity at the University of Aberdeen, and
Honorary Fellow of Exeter and Lincoln Colleges, Oxford.
8vo, cloth, with Map, £10.60.
ST. PAUL THE TRAVELLER AND
THE ROMAN CITIZEN.
"Professor Ramsay brings not only his great experience as a traveller and archæologist, but the resources of an ingenious mind, and a lively style. The book is, like everything Professor Ramsay does, extraordinarily alive. It shows everywhere personal learning, personal impression; it has the sharp touch of the traveller and the eye-witness."—Times.
"Professor Ramsay brings not only his extensive experience as a traveler and archaeologist, but also the insights of a clever mind and an engaging writing style. The book, like everything Professor Ramsay creates, is incredibly vibrant. It showcases personal knowledge and impressions throughout; it has the keen perspective of a traveler and an eyewitness."—Times.
With Maps and Illustrations, 8vo, cloth, 12s.
With maps and illustrations, 8vo, cloth, £12.
THE CHURCH IN THE ROMAN
EMPIRE BEFORE A.D. 170.
"The whole volume is full of freshness and originality.... I lay down his book with warm and sincere admiration. He has succeeded in investing a number of critical discussions with extraordinary vividness and reality."—Professor W. Sanday, in The Expositor.
"The entire book is packed with freshness and originality.... I put down his book with genuine admiration. He has managed to infuse several critical discussions with remarkable vividness and authenticity."—Professor W. Sanday, in The Expositor.
Crown 8vo, cloth, 5s.
Crown 8vo, fabric, 5s.
WAS CHRIST BORN AT
BETHLEHEM?
A Study in the Credibility of St. Luke.
A Study on the Credibility of St. Luke.
"The work is characterised by great earnestness as well as ability, while the learning which it displays is such as may be expected from one who has long made the topics discussed matter of special study, for the pursuit of which he has also had special opportunities."—Scotsman.
"The work shows a high level of seriousness and skill, and the knowledge it demonstrates is what you would expect from someone who has dedicated a long time to studying the topics discussed, for which he has also had unique opportunities."—Scotsman.
"There is much interesting matter on allied topics in this learned and informing work, which will sustain Professor Ramsay's reputation as an accomplished and courageous scholar."—Christian World.
"There is a lot of fascinating information on related topics in this knowledgeable and insightful work, which will uphold Professor Ramsay's reputation as a skilled and brave scholar."—Christian World.
London: HODDER & STOUGHTON.
London: Hodder & Stoughton.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] See p. 343.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See p. 343.
[2] At least those to whom the first twenty-three verses were addressed. There is distinct blame of worshipping in the groves of Asherah in the appended oracle (vv. 24-31), which is proof that this oracle was given at an earlier period than the rest of the chapter—a fair instance of the very great difficulty we have in determining the dates of the various prophecies of Isaiah.
[2] At least for those who received the first twenty-three verses. There is clear criticism of worshiping in the groves of Asherah in the added oracle (vv. 24-31), which shows that this oracle was delivered earlier than the rest of the chapter—a clear example of the significant challenge we face in figuring out the dates of the various prophecies of Isaiah.
[4] Ewald happily suggests that verse 17 has dropped out of, and should be restored to, its proper position at the end of the first "woe," where it contributes to the development of the meaning far more than from where it stands in the text.
[4] Ewald happily suggests that verse 17 has been overlooked and should be put back at the end of the first "woe," where it enhances the meaning much more effectively than its current placement in the text.
[5] Read past tenses, as in the margin of Revised Version, for all the future tenses, or better, the historical present, down to the end of the chapter.
[5] Read past tenses, as mentioned in the margin of the Revised Version, instead of all the future tenses, or preferably, use the historical present, until the end of the chapter.
[8] Ulrici: Shakespeare's Dramatic Art.
[9] A Browning's "Christmas Eve."
Browning's "Christmas Eve."
[10] Even Calvin, though in order to prove that Isaiah had been prophesying for some time before his inaugural vision, says that his commission implies some years' actual experience of the obstinacy of the people.
[10] Even Calvin, to demonstrate that Isaiah had been prophesying for quite a while before his first vision, notes that his commission suggests he had some years of real experience with the stubbornness of the people.
[12] Isa. vii. 12.
[14] Page 96.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Page 96.
[15] Physics and Politics (International Scientific Series), pp. 75 ff. One of the finest modern illustrations of the connection between faith and common-sense is found in the Letters of General Gordon to His Sister. Gordon's coolness in face of the slave trade, the just survey he makes of it, and the sensible advice which he gives about meeting it stand well in contrast to the haste and rash proposals of philanthropists at home, and are evidently due to his conviction that the slave trade, like everything else in the world, is in the hands of God, and so may be calmly studied and wisely checkmated. Gordon's letters make very clear how much of his shrewdness in dealing with men was due to the same source. It is instructive to observe throughout, how his complete resignation to the will of God and his perfect obedience delivered him from prejudices and partialities, from distractions and desires, that make sober judgement impossible in other men.
[15] Physics and Politics (International Scientific Series), pp. 75 ff. One of the best modern examples of the link between faith and common sense is found in the Letters of General Gordon to His Sister. Gordon's calmness in the face of the slave trade, his thoughtful analysis of it, and the practical advice he offers for confronting it sharply contrast with the impulsive and reckless suggestions of philanthropists back home. His perspective clearly stems from his belief that the slave trade, like everything else in the world, is under God's control, which allows for a reasoned study and a strategic response. Gordon's letters reveal that much of his astuteness in dealing with people came from this same belief. It’s noteworthy to see how his complete surrender to God's will and his unwavering obedience freed him from the biases and distractions that cloud sober judgment in others.
[16] 1 Sam. xii. 17.
[17] 1 Kings xiii. 3.
[18] Chap. xxxviii.
[19] Ewald.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Ewald.
[22] The Messiah, or Anointed, is used in the Old Testament of many agents of God: high-priest (Lev. iv. 3); ministers of the Word (Ps. cv. 15); Cyrus (Isa. xlv. 1); but mostly of God's king, actual (1 Sam. xxiv. 7), or expected (Dan. ix. 25). So it became in Jewish theology the technical term for the coming King and the Captain of salvation.
[22] The Messiah, or Anointed, is mentioned in the Old Testament in reference to various agents of God: the high priest (Lev. iv. 3); ministers of the Word (Ps. cv. 15); Cyrus (Isa. xlv. 1); but primarily refers to God's king, either the current one (1 Sam. xxiv. 7) or the one anticipated (Dan. ix. 25). Thus, in Jewish theology, it became the official term for the future King and the Leader of salvation.
[23] I regret very much that in previous editions I should have erroneously imputed this opinion to Dr. Hermann Schultz—through a mistranslation of his words on pp. 726, 727 of his A. T. Theologie.
[23] I deeply regret that in earlier editions I mistakenly attributed this opinion to Dr. Hermann Schultz—due to a mistranslation of his words on pages 726 and 727 of his A. T. Theologie.
[24] Prophets of Israel, p. 306.
[25] See further on this passage pp. 180-183. As is there pointed out, while these passages on the Messiah are indeed infrequent and unconnected, there is a very evident progress through them of Isaiah's conception of his Hero's character.
[25] For more on this passage, see pp. 180-183. As noted there, even though these passages about the Messiah are rare and unrelated, Isaiah's evolving understanding of his Hero's character is clearly evident throughout.
[26] Stanton: The Jewish and Christian Messiah.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Stanton: The Jewish and Christian Messiah.
[28] 2 Kings xvii. 5.
[31] It will be noticed that in the above version a different reading is adopted from the meaningless clause at the end of verse 27 in the English version, out of which a proper heading for the subsequent itinerary has been obtained by Robertson Smith (Journal of Philology, 1884, p. 62).
[31] You’ll see that in the version above, we’ve chosen a different interpretation compared to the pointless phrase at the end of verse 27 in the English version, from which Robertson Smith derived a suitable title for the following itinerary (Journal of Philology, 1884, p. 62).
[33] Dean Plumptre notes the identity of the ethical terminology of this passage with that of the book of Proverbs, and conjectures that the additions to the original nucleus, chaps. x.-xxiv., and therefore the whole form, of the book of Proverbs, may be due to the editorship of Isaiah, and perhaps was the manual of ethics, on which he sought to mould the character of Hezekiah (Expositor, series ii., v., p. 213).
[33] Dean Plumptre points out that the ethical terminology in this passage is consistent with that found in the book of Proverbs. He speculates that the additions to the original core sections, chapters 10-24, and thus the complete structure of the book of Proverbs, may be attributed to the editorial work of Isaiah, and might have served as the ethical guide that he aimed to shape the character of Hezekiah with (Expositor, series ii., v., p. 213).
[39] Galton, quoted by Darwin.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Galton, cited by Darwin.
[40] Isa. lxiii. 13, 14; Hos. xi. 4.
[42] Cheyne.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Cheyne.
[44] Cheyne.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Cheyne.
[45] Browning's Christmas Eve.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Browning's Christmas Eve.
[46] Chap. viii. 1 (p. 119).
[50] Cf. with the fifth and sixth verses of chap. xxxii. the forcible passage in the introduction to Carlyle's Cromwell's Letters, beginning, "Sure enough, in the Heroic Century, as in the Unheroic, knaves and cowards ... were not wanting. But the question always remains, Did they lie chained?" etc.
[50] See the fifth and sixth verses of chapter xxxii. the powerful excerpt in the introduction to Carlyle's Cromwell's Letters, which starts, "Sure enough, in the Heroic Century, just like in the Unheroic, there were always knaves and cowards ... But the question always remains, Were they kept in chains?" etc.
[51] Cf. Newman, Oxford University Sermons, xv.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See Newman, Oxford University Sermons, xv.
[52] Our translation, though picturesque, is misleading. The voice does not inquire, "What of the night?" i.e., whether it be fair or foul weather, but "How much of the night is passed?" literally "What from off the night?" This brings out a pathos that our English version has disguised. Edom feels that her night is lasting terribly long.
[52] Our translation, while colorful, is misleading. The voice does not ask, "What about the night?" i.e., whether the weather is good or bad, but rather "How much of the night has passed?" literally "What has come off the night?" This highlights a sense of sorrow that our English version has hidden. Edom senses that her night is dragging on painfully long.
[53] It is confusing to find this date attached to Sennacherib's invasion of 701, unless, with one or two critics, we place Hezekiah's accession in 715. But Hezekiah acceded in 728 or 727, and 701 would therefore be his twenty-sixth or twenty-seventh year. Mr. Cheyne, who takes 727 as the year of Hezekiah's accession, gets out of the difficulty by reading "Sargon" for "Sennacherib" in this verse and in 2 Kings xiii., and thus secures another reference to that invasion of Judah, which he supposes to have taken place under Sargon between 712 and 710. By the change of a letter some would read twenty-fourth for fourteenth. But in any case this date is confusing.
[53] It's confusing to see this date linked to Sennacherib's invasion of 701, unless we, like a few critics, assume that Hezekiah became king in 715. However, Hezekiah actually became king in 728 or 727, which means 701 would be his twenty-sixth or twenty-seventh year. Mr. Cheyne, who argues for 727 as the year of Hezekiah's accession, resolves the issue by suggesting that "Sargon" should be read instead of "Sennacherib" in this verse and in 2 Kings xiii., thus providing another reference to the invasion of Judah, which he believes occurred under Sargon between 712 and 710. Some would change a letter to read twenty-fourth instead of fourteenth. Regardless, this date is still confusing.
[57] Chap. i. 7-9.
[58] See p. 238.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See p. 238.
[59] Isa. xxxvi. 3.
[60] Schrader, Cuneiform Inscriptions, O.T., i., p. 286.
[61] 2 Kings xviii. 13-16. Here closes a paragraph. Ver. 17 begins to describe what Sennacherib did, in spite of Hezekiah's submission. He had withdrawn the army that had invested Jerusalem, for Hezekiah purchased its withdrawal by the tribute he sent. But Sennacherib, in spite of this, sent another corps of war against Jerusalem, which second attack is described in ver. 17 and onwards.
[61] 2 Kings xviii. 13-16. This section concludes a paragraph. Verse 17 starts to explain what Sennacherib did, despite Hezekiah's submission. He had pulled back the army that was surrounding Jerusalem because Hezekiah paid a tribute to have them leave. However, Sennacherib, regardless of this, sent another military unit to attack Jerusalem, which is detailed from verse 17 onward.
[62] Didron Christian Iconography, fig. 52.
[63] Chap. xxxvii.
[64] Chaps. iv. 4; xxx. 33.
[65] Cf. Browning's La Saisiaz.
[66] A still more striking analogy may be found in the case of Napoleon I. when in the East in 1799. He had just achieved a small victory which partly masked the previous failure of his campaign, when "Sir Sydney Smith now contrived that he should receive a packet of journals, by which he was informed of all that had passed recently in Europe and the disasters that France had suffered. His resolution was immediately taken. On August 22nd he wrote to Kleber announcing that he transferred to him the command of the expedition, and that he himself would return to Europe.... After carefully spreading false accounts of his intentions, he set sail on the night of the same day" (Professor Seeley, article "Napoleon" in the Ency. Brit.).
Below is a short piece of text (5 words or fewer). Modernize it into contemporary English if there's enough context, but do not add or omit any information. If context is insufficient, return it unchanged. Do not add commentary, and do not modify any placeholders. If you see placeholders of the form __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_x__, you must keep them exactly as-is so they can be replaced with links. An even more striking analogy can be found in the case of Napoleon I. when he was in the East in 1799. He had just won a small victory that partly concealed the earlier failures of his campaign when "Sir Sydney Smith arranged for him to receive a packet of journals, informing him of all that had recently happened in Europe and the disasters that France had faced. He immediately made his decision. On August 22nd, he wrote to Kleber announcing that he was transferring command of the expedition to him and that he would return to Europe himself.... After carefully spreading false accounts of his intentions, he set sail on the night of the same day" (Professor Seeley, article "Napoleon" in the Ency. Brit.).
[67] The statement of the Egyptian legend, that it was from a point in the neighbourhood of Pelusium that Sennacherib's army commenced its retreat, is not contradicted by anything in the Jewish records, which leave the locality of the disaster very vague, but, on the contrary, receives some support from what Isaiah expresses as at least the intention of Sennacherib (chap. xxxvii. 25).
[67] The Egyptian legend claims that Sennacherib's army started its retreat from near Pelusium, and this is not contradicted by the Jewish records. These records keep the specific location of the disaster quite vague, but, on the contrary, they actually support Isaiah's expression of Sennacherib's intentions at least (chap. xxxvii. 25).
[68] Gibbon, Decline and Fall, xliii.
[70] Gibbon, xlii.; lix.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Gibbon, p. xlii.; p. lix.
[71] Heb. xi.
[72] Isa. xxxviii., xxxix., has evidently been abridged from 2 Kings xx. and in some points has to be corrected by the latter. Chap. xxxviii. 21, 22, of course, must be brought forward before ver. 7.
[72] Isaiah 38 and 39 have clearly been shortened from 2 Kings 20, and in some respects need to be clarified by the latter. Chapters 38:21 and 22 should obviously be moved before verse 7.
[74] By Professor Fiske.
[75] "Those principles of natural philosophy which smothered the religions of the East with their rank and injurious growth are almost entirely absent from the religion of the Hebrews. Here the motive-power of development is to be found in ethical ideas, which, though not indeed alien to the life of other nations, were not the source from which their religious notions were derived."—(Lotze's Microcosmos, Eng. Transl., il., 466.)
[75] "The principles of natural philosophy that suppressed the religions of the East with their overwhelming and harmful influence are mostly missing from Hebrew religion. In this context, the driving force for development is rooted in ethical ideas, which, although not entirely foreign to other nations' lives, were not the foundation for their religious beliefs."—(Lotze's Microcosmos, Eng. Transl., il., 466.)
[76] P. 447 ff.
[77] It is, however, only just to add that, as Mr. Sayce has pointed out in the Hibbert Lectures for 1887 (p. 365), the claims of Babylonian kings and heroes for a seat on the mountain of the gods were not always mere arrogance, but the first efforts of the Babylonian mind to emancipate itself from the gloomy conceptions of Hades and provide a worthy immortality for virtue. Still most of the kings who pray for an entrance among the gods do so on the plea that they have been successful tyrants—a considerable difference from such an assurance as that of the sixteenth Psalm.
[77] It’s important to note that, as Mr. Sayce pointed out in the Hibbert Lectures for 1887 (p. 365), the claims of Babylonian kings and heroes to a place on the mountain of the gods weren’t always just arrogance. They represented the early efforts of the Babylonian mind to break free from the bleak ideas of Hades and create a deserving immortality for virtue. However, most of the kings who seek entry among the gods do so by claiming they were successful tyrants—this is quite different from the assurance found in the sixteenth Psalm.
[78] The popular Semitic conception of Hades contained within it neither grades of condition, according to the merits of men, nor any trace of an infernal torment in aggravation of the unsubstantial state to which all are equally reduced. This statement is true of the Old Testament till at least the Book of Daniel. Sheol is lit by no lurid fires, such as made the later Christian hell intolerable to the lost. That life is unsubstantial; that darkness and dust abound; above all, that God is not there, and that it is impossible to praise Him, is all the punishment which is given in Sheol. Extraordinary vice is punished above ground, in the name and family of the sinner. Sheol, with its monotony, is for average men; but extraordinary piety can break away from it (Ps. xvi.).
[78] The common Semitic view of Hades did not include different levels based on people's merits or any signs of painful torment that would make the empty existence all souls face even worse. This holds true for the Old Testament up until at least the Book of Daniel. Sheol is not illuminated by the fiery flames that later made the Christian hell unbearable for the damned. The existence there is insubstantial; darkness and dust are everywhere; most importantly, God is absent, and it's impossible to worship Him, which is the only punishment found in Sheol. Extreme wrongdoing is punished in the world above, impacting the sinner's name and family. Sheol, with its dullness, is for average people; however, exceptional devotion can escape from it (Ps. xvi.).
[79] Readers will remember a parallel to this ode in Carlyle's famous chapter on Louis the Unforgotten. No modern has rivalled Carlyle in his inheritance of this satire, except it be he whom Carlyle called "that Jew blackguard Heine."
[79] Readers will recall a similarity to this poem in Carlyle's well-known chapter on Louis the Unforgotten. No modern writer has matched Carlyle in his legacy of this satire, except for the person Carlyle referred to as "that Jew blackguard Heine."
[80] vv. 14-16, which are very perplexing. In 14 a company is introduced to us very vaguely as those or yonder ones, who are represented as seeing the bright side of the convulsion which is the subject of the chapter. They cry aloud from the sea; that is, from the west of the prophet. He is therefore in the east, and in captivity, in the centre of the convulsion. The problem is to find any actual historical situation, in which part of Israel was in the east in captivity, and part in the west free and full of reasons for praising God for the calamity, out of which their brethren saw no escape for themselves.
[80] vv. 14-16, which are quite confusing. In 14, a group is introduced to us very vaguely as those or those over there, who are depicted as seeing the bright side of the turmoil that is the focus of the chapter. They cry aloud from the sea; meaning from the west of the prophet. So, he is in the east, in captivity, at the center of the disturbance. The challenge is to locate any specific historical situation where part of Israel was in the east in captivity while another part was in the west, free and full of reasons to praise God for a disaster from which their fellow countrymen saw no escape.
[83] Even at the risk of incurring Canon Cheyne's charge of "ineradicable error," I feel I must keep to the older view of chap. xxxv. which makes it refer to the return from exile. No doubt the chapter covers more than the mere return, and includes "the glorious condition of Israel after the return;" but vv. 4 and 10 are undoubtedly addressed to Jews still in exile and undelivered.
[83] Even if it means facing Canon Cheyne's accusation of "unavoidable mistake," I believe I must adhere to the traditional interpretation of chapter xxxv., which relates to the return from exile. It's clear that the chapter encompasses more than just the return, including "the magnificent state of Israel after the return;" however, verses 4 and 10 are definitely directed at Jews who are still in exile and not yet liberated.
[85] I think this must be the meaning of ver. 16, if we are to allow that it has any sympathy with vv. 14 and 15. Bredenkamp suggests that the persons meant are themselves the dead. Jehovah has glorified the Church on earth; but the dead below are still in trouble, and pour out prayers (Virgil's "preces fundunt," Æneid, vi., 55), beneath this punishment which God causes to pass on all men (ver. 14). Bredenkamp bases this exegesis chiefly on the word for "prayer," which means chirping or whispering, a kind of voice imputed to the shades by the Hebrews and other ancient peoples. But while this word does originally mean whispering, it is never in Scripture applied to the dead, but, on the other hand, is a frequent name for divining or incantation. I therefore have felt compelled to understand it as used in this passage of the living, whose only resource in face of death—Goa's discipline par excellence—is to pour out incantations. If it be objected that the prophet would scarcely parallel the ordinary incantations on behalf of the dead with supplications to Jehovah, the answer is that he is talking poetically or popularly.
[85] I think this is likely the meaning of verse 16, if we consider that it relates to verses 14 and 15. Bredenkamp suggests that the people referred to are the dead themselves. God has honored the Church on earth, but those who have passed away are still in distress and pour out prayers (Virgil's "preces fundunt," Æneid, vi., 55), beneath the punishment that God imposes on all humanity (verse 14). Bredenkamp supports this interpretation mainly based on the term for "prayer," which means chirping or whispering, a type of voice attributed to spirits by the Hebrews and other ancient cultures. However, while this word does originally mean whispering, it is never used in Scripture to refer to the dead; instead, it frequently denotes divining or incantation. Therefore, I feel compelled to interpret it in this passage as referring to the living, whose only recourse in the face of death—God's ultimate test—is to perform incantations. If it’s argued that the prophet would hardly equate ordinary incantations for the dead with supplications to God, the response is that he is speaking in a poetic or popular manner.
[89] Cf. James i. 17.
Transcriber's note:
Variations in spelling and hyphenation have been preserved except in obvious cases of typographical error.
Variations in spelling and hyphenation have been kept the same except in clear cases of typing mistakes.
All advertising has been moved to the end of the book.
All advertising has been moved to the end of the book.
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!