This is a modern-English version of The Conduct of Life, originally written by Emerson, Ralph Waldo. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.

THE

THE

CONDUCT OF LIFE.

Living Your Life.

BY

BY

R. W. EMERSON.

R. W. Emerson.

BOSTON:
JAMES R. OSGOOD AND COMPANY,
LATE TICKNOR & FIELDS, AND FIELDS, OSGOOD, & Co.
1871.

BOSTON:
JAMES R. OSGOOD AND COMPANY,
FORMERLY TICKNOR & FIELDS, AND FIELDS, OSGOOD, & Co.
1871.

Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1860, by
R. W. EMERSON,
in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts

Entered according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1860, by
R. W. EMERSON,
in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts

I.

I.

FATE.

Destiny.

Delicate omens traced in air
To the lone bard true witness bare;
Birds with auguries on their wings
Chanted undeceiving things
Him to beckon, him to warn;
Well might then the poet scorn
To learn of scribe or courier
Hints writ in vaster character;
And on his mind, at dawn of day,
Soft shadows of the evening lay.
For the prevision is allied
Unto the thing so signified;
Or say, the foresight that awaits
Is the same Genius that creates.
Subtle signs drawn in the air
For the lone bard, a true witness bare;
Birds with omens on their wings
Sang clear and honest things
To call him forth, to give a warning;
It would be easy for the poet to scorn
Learning from a scribe or messenger
Hints written in grander character;
And on his mind, at the break of day,
Gentle shadows of the evening lay.
For the insight is connected
To the thing that’s reflected;
Or say, the foresight that is in store
Is the same spirit that creates more.

FATE.

Destiny.

It chanced during one winter, a few years ago, that our cities were bent on discussing the theory of the Age. By an odd coincidence, four or five noted men were each reading a discourse to the citizens of Boston or New York, on the Spirit of the Times. It so happened that the subject had the same prominence in some remarkable pamphlets and journals issued in London in the same season. To me, however, the question of the times resolved itself into a practical question of the conduct of life. How shall I live? We are incompetent to solve the times. Our geometry cannot span the huge orbits of the prevailing ideas, behold their return, and reconcile their opposition. We can only obey our own polarity. 'Tis fine for us to speculate and elect our course, if we must accept an irresistible dictation.

One winter a few years ago, our cities were focused on discussing the current theories of the era. By a strange coincidence, four or five prominent individuals were giving talks to the people of Boston or New York about the Spirit of the Times. It just so happened that the same topics were featured in some notable pamphlets and journals released in London that season. For me, though, the question of the times boiled down to a basic question about how to live. How should I live my life? We can't really figure out the issues of the times. Our understanding can't grasp the vast orbits of the dominant ideas, see their return, and balance their contradictions. We can only follow our own instincts. It's all well and good to theorize and choose our path, but we still have to surrender to an unavoidable influence.

In our first steps to gain our wishes, we come upon immovable limitations. We are fired with the hope to reform men. After many experiments, we find that we must begin earlier,—at school. But the boys and girls are not docile; we can make nothing of them. We decide that they are not of good stock. We must begin our reform earlier still,—at generation: that is to say, there is Fate, or laws of the world.

In our initial attempts to achieve our goals, we encounter stubborn limitations. We're filled with the hope to change people. After trying various approaches, we realize we need to start even earlier—at school. But the boys and girls are not compliant; we struggle to make any impact on them. We conclude that they come from poor backgrounds. We decide we need to start our reform even earlier—at the point of creation; in other words, there are forces beyond our control, or the laws of nature.

But if there be irresistible dictation, this dictation understands itself. If we must accept Fate, we are not less compelled to affirm liberty, the significance of the individual, the grandeur of duty, the power of character. This is true, and that other is true. But our geometry cannot span these extreme points, and reconcile them. What to do? By obeying each thought frankly, by harping, or, if you will, pounding on each string, we learn at last its power. By the same obedience to other thoughts, we learn theirs, and then comes some reasonable hope of harmonizing them. We are sure, that, though we know not how, necessity does comport with liberty, the individual with the world, my polarity with the spirit of the times. The riddle of the age has for each a private solution. If one would study his own time, it must be by this method of taking up in turn each of the leading topics which belong to our scheme of human life, and, by firmly stating all that is agreeable to experience on one, and doing the same justice to the opposing facts in the others, the true limitations will appear. Any excess of emphasis, on one part, would be corrected, and a just balance would be made.

But if there's an unavoidable force at play, it recognizes itself. If we have to accept fate, we are also compelled to affirm freedom, the importance of the individual, the value of duty, and the strength of character. Both statements are true. However, our understanding can't bridge these two extremes and reconcile them. So, what should we do? By honestly engaging with each thought, by exploring or, if you prefer, pressing down on each idea, we eventually grasp its significance. By showing the same commitment to other thoughts, we understand theirs as well, leading to a reasonable hope of bringing them together. We know that, even though we don't understand how, necessity can coexist with freedom, the individual with the larger world, and my beliefs with the spirit of the times. The puzzle of our era has a personal solution for everyone. If one wants to study their own time, they must adopt the method of addressing each of the main topics related to our understanding of human life in turn, clearly stating everything that aligns with experience on one side, and doing equal justice to the contradictory facts on the others, revealing the true boundaries. Any excessive focus on one aspect will be adjusted, and a fair balance will be achieved.

But let us honestly state the facts. Our America has a bad name for superficialness. Great men, great nations, have not been boasters and buffoons, but perceivers of the terror of life, and have manned themselves to face it. The Spartan, embodying his religion in his country, dies before its majesty without a question. The Turk, who believes his doom is written on the iron leaf in the moment when he entered the world, rushes on the enemy's sabre with undivided will. The Turk, the Arab, the Persian, accepts the foreordained fate.

But let's be honest about the facts. Our America has a reputation for being superficial. Great individuals and nations haven’t been braggarts and jokers; instead, they have recognized the harsh realities of life and prepared themselves to confront it. The Spartan, embodying his belief in his homeland, dies before its grandeur without hesitation. The Turk, who believes his destiny is engraved in the iron leaf the moment he enters the world, charges toward the enemy’s sword with unwavering determination. The Turk, the Arab, the Persian, all accept their predetermined fate.

"On two days, it steads not to run from thy grave,
The appointed, and the unappointed day;
On the first, neither balm nor physician can save,
Nor thee, on the second, the Universe slay."
"On two days, it’s pointless to run from your grave,
The scheduled day, and the unexpected day;
On the first, neither medicine nor doctor can help,
Nor can the Universe take you on the second."

The Hindoo, under the wheel, is as firm. Our Calvinists, in the last generation, had something of the same dignity. They felt that the weight of the Universe held them down to their place. What could they do? Wise men feel that there is something which cannot be talked or voted away,—a strap or belt which girds the world.

The Hindu, under the wheel, is just as steadfast. Our Calvinists from the last generation shared a similar dignity. They believed that the weight of the universe kept them grounded. What could *they* do? Wise individuals understand that there is an element that cannot be spoken or voted away—a strap or belt that holds the world together.

"The Destiny, minister general,
That executeth in the world o'er all,
The purveyance which God hath seen beforne,
So strong it is, that tho' the world had sworn
The contrary of a thing by yea or nay,
Yet sometime it shall fallen on a day
That falleth not oft in a thousand year;
For, certainly, our appetites here,
Be it of war, or peace, or hate, or love,
All this is ruled by the sight above."
CHAUCER: The Knight's Tale.
"Destiny, the general minister,
That oversees everything in the world,
The provisions that God has already known,
Is so powerful that even if the world swore
The opposite of something with a yes or no,
There will come a day
That does not happen often in a thousand years;
For, indeed, our desires here,
Whether for war, peace, hate, or love,
All of this is governed by a higher view."
CHAUCER: The Knight's Tale.

The Greek Tragedy expressed the same sense: "Whatever is fated, that will take place. The great immense mind of Jove is not to be transgressed."

The Greek Tragedy conveyed the same idea: "Whatever is meant to happen will happen. The vast, mighty mind of Jove cannot be overruled."

Savages cling to a local god of one tribe or town. The broad ethics of Jesus were quickly narrowed to village theologies, which preach an election or favoritism. And, now and then, an amiable parson, like Jung Stilling, or Robert Huntington, believes in a pistareen-Providence, which, whenever the good man wants a dinner, makes that somebody shall knock at his door, and leave a half-dollar. But Nature is no sentimentalist,—does not cosset or pamper us. We must see that the world is rough and surly, and will not mind drowning a man or a woman; but swallows your ship like a grain of dust. The cold, inconsiderate of persons, tingles your blood, benumbs your feet, freezes a man like an apple. The diseases, the elements, fortune, gravity, lightning, respect no persons. The way of Providence is a little rude. The habit of snake and spider, the snap of the tiger and other leapers and bloody jumpers, the crackle of the bones of his prey in the coil of the anaconda,—these are in the system, and our habits are like theirs. You have just dined, and, however scrupulously the slaughter-house is concealed in the graceful distance of miles, there is complicity,—expensive races,—race living at the expense of race. The planet is liable to shocks from comets, perturbations from planets, rendings from earthquake and volcano, alterations of climate, precessions of equinoxes. Rivers dry up by opening of the forest. The sea changes its bed. Towns and counties fall into it. At Lisbon, an earthquake killed men like flies. At Naples, three years ago, ten thousand persons were crushed in a few minutes. The scurvy at sea; the sword of the climate in the west of Africa, at Cayenne, at Panama, at New Orleans, cut off men like a massacre. Our western prairie shakes with fever and ague. The cholera, the small-pox, have proved as mortal to some tribes, as a frost to the crickets, which, having filled the summer with noise, are silenced by a fall of the temperature of one night. Without uncovering what does not concern us, or counting how many species of parasites hang on a bombyx; or groping after intestinal parasites, or infusory biters, or the obscurities of alternate generation;—the forms of the shark, the labrus, the jaw of the sea-wolf paved with crushing teeth, the weapons of the grampus, and other warriors hidden in the sea,—are hints of ferocity in the interiors of nature. Let us not deny it up and down. Providence has a wild, rough, incalculable road to its end, and it is of no use to try to whitewash its huge, mixed instrumentalities, or to dress up that terrific benefactor in a clean shirt and white neckcloth of a student in divinity.

Savages are attached to a local god from their tribe or town. The broad teachings of Jesus quickly got narrowed down to local beliefs that promote favoritism. Occasionally, a friendly pastor, like Jung Stilling or Robert Huntington, believes in a kind of divine providence that makes sure whenever a good person needs dinner, someone will knock on their door and leave a half-dollar. But Nature isn’t sentimental—it doesn’t coddle or indulge us. We need to realize the world is harsh and unfriendly and won’t hesitate to drown a man or woman; it swallows your ship like a speck of dust. The coldness, careless of individuals, makes your blood tingle, numbs your feet, and freezes a man like an apple. Diseases, natural elements, luck, gravity, lightning—none of these care about people. Providence has a bit of a rough side. The habits of snakes and spiders, the strike of a tiger and other predators, the snapping of bones of its prey in the coils of the anaconda—these are woven into the system, and our behaviors reflect that. You’ve just finished eating, and no matter how carefully the slaughterhouse is hidden miles away, there is a connection—wealthy races living off the backs of others. The planet is subject to shocks from comets, disruptions from planets, splits from earthquakes and volcanoes, climate changes, and shifts in equinoxes. Rivers dry up when forests are cleared. The sea rearranges itself. Towns and counties get swallowed up. In Lisbon, an earthquake killed people like flies. Three years ago in Naples, ten thousand people were crushed in a matter of minutes. Scurvy at sea, and the brutal climate in West Africa, Cayenne, Panama, and New Orleans cuts down people like a massacre. Our western prairie shakes with fever and chills. Cholera and smallpox have struck some tribes as fatally as a frost that silences crickets after a summer of noise. Without delving into what doesn’t concern us, or counting how many parasites cling to a silk moth; or looking for intestinal parasites, or tiny biting creatures, or the mysteries of alternate generation;—the forms of the shark, the labrus, the jaw of the sea-wolf lined with crushing teeth, the weapons of the orca, and other hidden sea predators—are signs of nature’s ferocity. Let’s not deny it. Providence has a wild, rough, unpredictable path to its destination, and it’s pointless to try to clean up its huge, complicated instruments or to dress that formidable benefactor in a tidy shirt and white collar like some theology student.

Will you say, the disasters which threaten mankind are exceptional, and one need not lay his account for cataclysms every day? Aye, but what happens once, may happen again, and so long as these strokes are not to be parried by us, they must be feared.

Will you argue that the disasters threatening humanity are rare and that we don’t need to expect catastrophic events every day? Yes, but something that happens once can happen again, and as long as we can't protect ourselves from these blows, we need to be afraid of them.

But these shocks and ruins are less destructive to us, than the stealthy power of other laws which act on us daily. An expense of ends to means is fate;—organization tyrannizing over character. The menagerie, or forms and powers of the spine, is a book of fate: the bill of the bird, the skull of the snake, determines tyrannically its limits. So is the scale of races, of temperaments; so is sex; so is climate; so is the reaction of talents imprisoning the vital power in certain directions. Every spirit makes its house; but afterwards the house confines the spirit.

But these shocks and disasters are less harmful to us than the hidden influence of other laws that affect us every day. The way we prioritize ends over means is fate; organization rules over character. The menagerie, or the forms and powers of the spine, is a book of fate: the beak of the bird, the skull of the snake, brutally defines its boundaries. The same goes for the scale of races, temperaments; the same for gender; the same for climate; the same for the way talents restrict the vital energy in specific directions. Every spirit creates its home, but afterward, the home restricts the spirit.

The gross lines are legible to the dull: the cabman is phrenologist so far: he looks in your face to see if his shilling is sure. A dome of brow denotes one thing; a pot-belly another; a squint, a pugnose, mats of hair, the pigment of the epidermis, betray character. People seem sheathed in their tough organization. Ask Spurzheim, ask the doctors, ask Quetelet, if temperaments decide nothing? or if there be anything they do not decide? Read the description in medical books of the four temperaments, and you will think you are reading your own thoughts which you had not yet told. Find the part which black eyes, and which blue eyes, play severally in the company. How shall a man escape from his ancestors, or draw off from his veins the black drop which he drew from his father's or his mother's life? It often appears in a family, as if all the qualities of the progenitors were potted in several jars,—some ruling quality in each son or daughter of the house,—and sometimes the unmixed temperament, the rank unmitigated elixir, the family vice, is drawn off in a separate individual, and the others are proportionally relieved. We sometimes see a change of expression in our companion, and say, his father, or his mother, comes to the windows of his eyes, and sometimes a remote relative. In different hours, a man represents each of several of his ancestors, as if there were seven or eight of us rolled up in each man's skin,--seven or eight ancestors at least,—and they constitute the variety of notes for that new piece of music which his life is. At the corner of the street, you read the possibility of each passenger, in the facial angle, in the complexion, in the depth of his eye. His parentage determines it. Men are what their mothers made them. You may as well ask a loom which weaves huckaback, why it does not make cashmere, as expect poetry from this engineer, or a chemical discovery from that jobber. Ask the digger in the ditch to explain Newton's laws: the fine organs of his brain have been pinched by overwork and squalid poverty from father to son, for a hundred years. When each comes forth from his mother's womb, the gate of gifts closes behind him. Let him value his hands and feet, he has but one pair. So he has but one future, and that is already predetermined in his lobes, and described in that little fatty face, pig-eye, and squat form. All the privilege and all the legislation of the world cannot meddle or help to make a poet or a prince of him.

The obvious signs are clear even to the slow-witted: the cab driver plays phrenologist to a point; he studies your face to determine if he can trust his shilling. A broad forehead signifies one thing; a potbelly indicates another; a squint, a pugnose, tangled hair, the color of the skin—all reveal character. People seem encased in their tough makeup. Ask Spurzheim, ask the doctors, ask Quetelet, if temperaments mean nothing, or if there’s anything they don’t influence? Read the descriptions in medical books about the four temperaments, and you’ll feel like you’re reading your own unspoken thoughts. Find out the roles that black eyes and blue eyes play differently in society. How can a person escape their ancestors or rid themselves of the dark traits inherited from their parents? It often seems in a family that all qualities of the ancestors are stored in different jars—each child carries a dominant trait from the family—and sometimes the unrefined temperament or family flaw surfaces in one individual, relieving the others of its burden. Occasionally, we notice a shift in our companion’s expression and think his father or mother appears in his eyes, sometimes even a distant relative. In various moments, a person embodies several of their ancestors, as if seven or eight of them are rolled into each individual—at least seven or eight ancestors—and together they create the diverse notes for the unique symphony that is their life. At the street corner, you can read the potential of each passerby in their facial angle, skin tone, and the intensity of their gaze. Their lineage shapes them. Men are the products of their mothers. It would be as pointless to ask a loom that weaves rough fabric why it doesn’t produce cashmere as it is to expect poetry from this engineer or a scientific breakthrough from that laborer. Asking the ditch digger to explain Newton’s laws is futile: the intricate workings of his brain have been stunted by generations of hard labor and poverty. When each person is born, the gate of potential closes behind them. They can only value their hands and feet; there's just one pair. Likewise, they have just one future, which is already set in their brain structure and reflected in that pudgy face, small eyes, and short stature. No amount of privilege or legislation in the world can change them into a poet or a prince.

Jesus said, "When he looketh on her, he hath committed adultery." But he is an adulterer before he has yet looked on the woman, by the superfluity of animal, and the defect of thought, in his constitution. Who meets him, or who meets her, in the street, sees that they are ripe to be each other's victim.

Jesus said, "When he looks at her, he's committed adultery." But he's an adulterer even before he looks at the woman, due to excessive desire and a lack of thoughtful consideration in his nature. Anyone who encounters him, or her, on the street can see that they are ready to be each other's prey.

In certain men, digestion and sex absorb the vital force, and the stronger these are, the individual is so much weaker. The more of these drones perish, the better for the hive. If, later, they give birth to some superior individual, with force enough to add to this animal a new aim, and a complete apparatus to work it out, all the ancestors are gladly forgotten. Most men and most women are merely one couple more. Now and then, one has a new cell or camarilla opened in his brain,—an architectural, a musical, or a philological knack, some stray taste or talent for flowers, or chemistry, or pigments, or story-telling, a good hand for drawing, a good foot for dancing, an athletic frame for wide journeying, &c.—which skill nowise alters rank in the scale of nature, but serves to pass the time, the life of sensation going on as before. At last, these hints and tendencies are fixed in one, or in a succession. Each absorbs so much food and force, as to become itself a new centre. The new talent draws off so rapidly the vital force, that not enough remains for the animal functions, hardly enough for health; so that, in the second generation, if the like genius appear, the health is visibly deteriorated, and the generative force impaired.

In some men, digestion and sex take up all their energy, and the stronger these instincts are, the weaker the individual becomes. The more of these non-contributors die off, the better it is for the community. If, later on, they create a superior individual with enough strength to give this being a new purpose and the ability to achieve it, all their ancestors are easily forgotten. Most men and women are just another couple in the crowd. Occasionally, someone has a new idea or skill emerge in their mind—maybe an architectural talent, a musical ability, or a knack for languages, some random interest in flowers, chemistry, colors, storytelling, a good hand for drawing, natural talent for dancing, or a strong physique for traveling, etc.—which does not change their place in the natural order but simply keeps them occupied, while the experience of life continues as before. Eventually, these hints and inclinations become established in one person or in a series. Each one consumes so much energy that they become a new center of focus. This new talent quickly absorbs vital energy, leaving hardly enough for basic bodily functions and barely enough for good health. So, in the second generation, if a similar talent appears, health noticeably declines, and reproductive strength weakens.

People are born with the moral or with the material bias;—uterine brothers with this diverging destination: and I suppose, with high magnifiers, Mr. Frauenhofer or Dr. Carpenter might come to distinguish in the embryo at the fourth day, this is a Whig, and that a Free-soiler.

People are born with either a moral or a material bias; uterine siblings diverge towards different paths. I imagine that, with powerful magnifiers, Mr. Frauenhofer or Dr. Carpenter could identify at four days old which embryo is a Whig and which one is a Free-soiler.

It was a poetic attempt to lift this mountain of Fate, to reconcile this despotism of race with liberty, which led the Hindoos to say, "Fate is nothing but the deeds committed in a prior state of existence." I find the coincidence of the extremes of eastern and western speculation in the daring statement of Schelling, "there is in every man a certain feeling, that he has been what he is from all eternity, and by no means became such in time." To say it less sublimely,—in the history of the individual is always an account of his condition, and he knows himself to be a party to his present estate.

It was a poetic attempt to lift this burden of Fate and reconcile the oppression of race with freedom, which led the Hindus to say, "Fate is just the result of actions taken in a previous life." I see the similarity between the extremes of Eastern and Western thought in Schelling's bold assertion, "there is in every person a certain feeling that they have been what they are for all eternity and did not become this in time." To put it more simply, in the story of an individual lies an account of their situation, and they recognize themselves as a contributor to their current state.

A good deal of our politics is physiological. Now and then, a man of wealth in the heyday of youth adopts the tenet of broadest freedom. In England, there is always some man of wealth and large connection planting himself, during all his years of health, on the side of progress, who, as soon as he begins to die, checks his forward play, calls in his troops, and becomes conservative. All conservatives are such from personal defects. They have been effeminated by position or nature, born halt and blind, through luxury of their parents, and can only, like invalids, act on the defensive. But strong natures, backwoodsmen, New Hampshire giants, Napoleons, Burkes, Broughams, Websters, Kossuths, are inevitable patriots, until their life ebbs, and their defects and gout, palsy and money, warp them.

A lot of our politics is rooted in human nature. Every now and then, a wealthy young man embraces the idea of complete freedom. In England, there’s always some wealthy individual with extensive connections who supports progress throughout their healthy years, but as soon as they start to decline, they pull back, regroup, and become conservative. All conservatives have personal shortcomings. They’ve been softened by their status or circumstances, often born weak and unable to see, due to their parents’ wealth, and can only act defensively like the ill. But strong people—frontiersmen, giants from New Hampshire, Napoleons, Burkes, Broughams, Websters, Kossuths—are natural patriots until they grow old, and their flaws, illness, wealth, and other issues start to change them.

The strongest idea incarnates itself in majorities and nations, in the healthiest and strongest. Probably, the election goes by avoirdupois weight, and, if you could weigh bodily the tonnage of any hundred of the Whig and the Democratic party in a town, on the Dearborn balance, as they passed the hayscales, you could predict with certainty which party would carry it. On the whole, it would be rather the speediest way of deciding the vote, to put the selectmen or the mayor and aldermen at the hayscales.

The strongest idea manifests in majorities and nations, in the healthiest and strongest groups. It’s likely that the election is determined by sheer weight, and if you could physically weigh the supporters of the Whig and Democratic parties in a town, using the Dearborn balance as they passed the hayscales, you could reliably predict which party would win. Overall, a quicker way to decide the vote would be to weigh the selectmen or the mayor and city council at the hayscales.

In science, we have to consider two things: power and circumstance. All we know of the egg, from each successive discovery, is, another vesicle; and if, after five hundred years, you get a better observer, or a better glass, he finds within the last observed another. In vegetable and animal tissue, it is just alike, and all that the primary power or spasm operates, is, still, vesicles, vesicles. Yes,—but the tyrannical Circumstance! A vesicle in new circumstances, a vesicle lodged in darkness, Oken thought, became animal; in light, a plant. Lodged in the parent animal, it suffers changes, which end in unsheathing miraculous capability in the unaltered vesicle, and it unlocks itself to fish, bird, or quadruped, head and foot, eye and claw. The Circumstance is Nature. Nature is, what you may do. There is much you may not. We have two things,—the circumstance, and the life. Once we thought, positive power was all. Now we learn, that negative power, or circumstance, is half. Nature is the tyrannous circumstance, the thick skull, the sheathed snake, the ponderous, rock-like jaw; necessitated activity; violent direction; the conditions of a tool, like the locomotive, strong enough on its track, but which can do nothing but mischief off of it; or skates, which are wings on the ice, but fetters on the ground.

In science, we need to think about two things: power and circumstance. Everything we know about the egg, from each new discovery, is just another vesicle; and if, after five hundred years, you get a better observer or a better lens, they find yet another one inside the last observed. The same goes for plant and animal tissue; all that the primary power or spasm operates is still vesicles, vesicles. Yes—but then there’s the tyrannical Circumstance! A vesicle in new circumstances, a vesicle stuck in darkness, according to Oken, becomes an animal; in light, it becomes a plant. When it’s in the parent animal, it undergoes changes that reveal miraculous potential within the unaltered vesicle, and it opens up to fish, birds, or mammals, head and foot, eye and claw. The Circumstance is Nature. Nature is about what you can do. There’s a lot you can’t. We have two things—circumstance and life. Once we believed that positive power was everything. Now we understand that negative power, or circumstance, is just as important. Nature is the tyrannical circumstance, the thick skull, the sheathed snake, the heavy, rock-like jaw; it requires action, forces direction; it has the qualities of a tool, like a locomotive that can run strong on its tracks but does nothing but cause trouble off of them; or skates, which act like wings on the ice but become shackles on the ground.

The book of Nature is the book of Fate. She turns the gigantic pages,—leaf after leaf,—never re-turning one. One leaf she lays down, a floor of granite; then a thousand ages, and a bed of slate; a thousand ages, and a measure of coal; a thousand ages, and a layer of marl and mud: vegetable forms appear; her first misshapen animals, zoophyte, trilobium, fish; then, saurians,—rude forms, in which she has only blocked her future statue, concealing under these unwieldly monsters the fine type of her coming king. The face of the planet cools and dries, the races meliorate, and man is born. But when a race has lived its term, it comes no more again.

The book of Nature is the book of Fate. She flips through the massive pages—one after another—never going back to a previous one. One page shows a layer of granite; then after a thousand ages, a bed of slate; another thousand ages, and a layer of coal; another thousand ages, and a mix of marl and mud: plant life appears; her first odd creatures, zoophytes, trilobites, fish; then, reptiles—primitive forms, representing only the outline of her future masterpiece, hiding beneath these clumsy beasts the refined figure of her upcoming king. The planet’s surface cools and dries, species evolve, and humanity emerges. But when a species has fulfilled its time, it doesn’t come back.

The population of the world is a conditional population; not the best, but the best that could live now; and the scale of tribes, and the steadiness with which victory adheres to one tribe, and defeat to another, is as uniform as the superposition of strata. We know in history what weight belongs to race. We see the English, French, and Germans planting themselves on every shore and market of America and Australia, and monopolizing the commerce of these countries. We like the nervous and victorious habit of our own branch of the family. We follow the step of the Jew, of the Indian, of the Negro. We see how much will has been expended to extinguish the Jew, in vain. Look at the unpalatable conclusions of Knox, in his "Fragment of Races,"—a rash and unsatisfactory writer, but charged with pungent and unforgetable truths. "Nature respects race, and not hybrids." "Every race has its own habitat." "Detach a colony from the race, and it deteriorates to the crab." See the shades of the picture. The German and Irish millions, like the Negro, have a great deal of guano in their destiny. They are ferried over the Atlantic, and carted over America, to ditch and to drudge, to make corn cheap, and then to lie down prematurely to make a spot of green grass on the prairie. One more fagot of these adamantine bandages, is, the new science of Statistics. It is a rule, that the most casual and extraordinary events—if the basis of population is broad enough—become matter of fixed calculation. It would not be safe to say when a captain like Bonaparte, a singer like Jenny Lind, or a navigator like Bowditch, would be born in Boston: but, on a population of twenty or two hundred millions, something like accuracy may be had.1

The world’s population is a conditional one; not the best, but the best that can exist now. The patterns of tribes and the way victory consistently favors one tribe while defeat impacts another are as regular as the layers of geological strata. We understand in history how much weight race carries. We see the English, French, and Germans establishing themselves on every shore and market in America and Australia, dominating the commerce of these countries. We admire the energetic and victorious nature of our own branch of the family. We observe the paths of the Jew, the Indian, and the Negro. We recognize the immense effort that has been made to eradicated the Jew, all in vain. Take a look at the unappealing conclusions of Knox in his "Fragment of Races"—he’s a bold and unsatisfactory writer, but one who conveys sharp and unforgettable truths. "Nature respects race, not hybrids." "Every race has its own habitat." "Separate a colony from its race, and it deteriorates to the crab." Consider the complexities of the situation. The millions of Germans and Irish, like the Negro, have a heavy share of hardship in their fate. They are brought across the Atlantic and transported throughout America, to labor in the fields and work hard, making corn cheap, only to eventually rest on the prairies, turning into patches of green grass. Another element of these unyielding realities is the emerging science of Statistics. It’s a principle that even the most random and extraordinary events—if the population base is large enough—can be calculated with a degree of certainty. It wouldn’t be easy to predict when a leader like Bonaparte, a singer like Jenny Lind, or a navigator like Bowditch would be born in Boston; but with a population of twenty or two hundred million, we might achieve something resembling accuracy.1

[1]

"Everything which pertains to the human species, considered as a whole, belongs to the order of physical facts. The greater the number of individuals, the more does the influence of the individual will disappear, leaving predominance to a series of general facts dependent on causes by which society exists, and is preserved."—QUETELET.

"Everything related to humanity as a whole is part of physical facts. The more individuals there are, the less influence any one person has, allowing a series of general facts driven by the causes that allow society to exist and persist to take precedence."—QUETELET.

'Tis frivolous to fix pedantically the date of particular inventions. They have all been invented over and over fifty times. Man is the arch machine, of which all these shifts drawn from himself are toy models. He helps himself on each emergency by copying or duplicating his own structure, just so far as the need is. 'Tis hard to find the right Homer, Zoroaster, or Menu; harder still to find the Tubal Cain, or Vulcan, or Cadmus, or Copernicus, or Fust, or Fulton, the indisputable inventor. There are scores and centuries of them. "The air is full of men." This kind of talent so abounds, this constructive tool-making efficiency, as if it adhered to the chemic atoms, as if the air he breathes were made of Vaucansons, Franklins, and Watts.

It's pointless to obsessively pin down the specific dates of inventions. They've been created and recreated countless times. Humans are the ultimate machines, and all these inventions are just small models made from ourselves. We adapt to each situation by mimicking our own design, only as much as necessary. It's difficult to identify the true Homer, Zoroaster, or Menu; even harder to find the definitive Tubal Cain, Vulcan, Cadmus, Copernicus, Fust, or Fulton—the unquestionable inventor. There are countless individuals across centuries. "The air is full of men." This type of talent is abundant, this ability to create tools, as if it was ingrained in the very atoms, as if the air we breathe is filled with the spirits of Vaucanson, Franklin, and Watt.

Doubtless, in every million there will be an astronomer, a mathematician, a comic poet, a mystic. No one can read the history of astronomy, without perceiving that Copernicus, Newton, Laplace, are not new men, or a new kind of men, but that Thales, Anaximenes, Hipparchus, Empedocles, Aristarchus, Pythagoras, Œnopides, had anticipated them; each had the same tense geometrical brain, apt for the same vigorous computation and logic, a mind parallel to the movement of the world. The Roman mile probably rested on a measure of a degree of the meridian. Mahometan and Chinese know what we know of leap-year, of the Gregorian calendar, and of the precession of the equinoxes. As, in every barrel of cowries, brought to New Bedford, there shall be one orangia, so there will, in a dozen millions of Malays and Mahometans, be one or two astronomical skulls. In a large city, the most casual things, and things whose beauty lies in their casualty, are produced as punctually and to order as the baker's muffin for breakfast. Punch makes exactly one capital joke a week; and the journals contrive to furnish one good piece of news every day.

Without a doubt, in every million people there will be an astronomer, a mathematician, a comic poet, and a mystic. Anyone who reads the history of astronomy will notice that Copernicus, Newton, and Laplace are not new individuals or a new type of person, but that Thales, Anaximenes, Hipparchus, Empedocles, Aristarchus, Pythagoras, and Œnopides had predicted their ideas; each possessed the same intense geometric mind, capable of the same vigorous computation and logic, a mind in sync with the movements of the world. The Roman mile was likely based on a measure of a degree of the meridian. Muslims and the Chinese know what we know about leap years, the Gregorian calendar, and the precession of the equinoxes. Just as in every barrel of cowries brought to New Bedford, there will be one orangia, there will be one or two astronomical thinkers among millions of Malays and Muslims. In a big city, even the most casual things, and things whose beauty lies in their randomness, are produced as timely and orderly as a baker’s muffin for breakfast. Punch delivers exactly one great joke a week; and the newspapers manage to provide one good piece of news every day.

And not less work the laws of repression, the penalties of violated functions. Famine, typhus, frost, war, suicide, and effete races, must be reckoned calculable parts of the system of the world.

And just as importantly, the laws of repression, the consequences of disregarded responsibilities, must be considered. Famine, typhus, cold, war, suicide, and declining populations need to be seen as measurable components of the global system.

These are pebbles from the mountain, hints of the terms by which our life is walled up, and which show a kind of mechanical exactness, as of a loom or mill, in what we call casual or fortuitous events.

These are stones from the mountain, clues about the conditions that confine our lives, and they reveal a sort of mechanical precision, like that of a loom or mill, in what we consider random or accidental events.

The force with which we resist these torrents of tendency looks so ridiculously inadequate, that it amounts to little more than a criticism or a protest made by a minority of one, under compulsion of millions. I seemed, in the height of a tempest, to see men overboard struggling in the waves, and driven about here and there. They glanced intelligently at each other, but 'twas little they could do for one another; 'twas much if each could keep afloat alone. Well, they had a right to their eye-beams, and all the rest was Fate.

The strength with which we fight against these overwhelming tendencies feels so laughably weak that it’s little more than a criticism or protest from a single person under pressure from millions. It felt like being in the middle of a storm, seeing people overboard struggling in the waves, tossed around aimlessly. They looked at each other knowingly, but there wasn’t much they could do to help one another; it was a big accomplishment just to stay afloat individually. They had the right to their glances, and everything else was just fate.

We cannot trifle with this reality, this cropping-out in our planted gardens of the core of the world. No picture of life can have any veracity that does not admit the odious facts. A man's power is hooped in by a necessity, which, by many experiments, he touches on every side, until he learns its arc.

We can’t ignore this reality, this missing piece in our cultivated gardens of the essence of the world. No depiction of life can be truthful if it doesn’t acknowledge the unpleasant truths. A person’s power is limited by a necessity that, through many experiments, he explores from every angle until he understands its range.

The element running through entire nature, which we popularly call Fate, is known to us as limitation. Whatever limits us, we call Fate. If we are brute and barbarous, the fate takes a brute and dreadful shape. As we refine, our checks become finer. If we rise to spiritual culture, the antagonism takes a spiritual form. In the Hindoo fables, Vishnu follows Maya through all her ascending changes, from insect and crawfish up to elephant; whatever form she took, he took the male form of that kind, until she became at last woman and goddess, and he a man and a god. The limitations refine as the soul purifies, but the ring of necessity is always perched at the top.

The element that runs through all of nature, which we commonly refer to as Fate, is really about limitation. Whatever restricts us, we call Fate. If we are crude and savage, fate appears in a harsh and terrible form. As we improve ourselves, our limitations become more subtle. If we elevate to a spiritual level, the struggle takes on a spiritual shape. In Hindu stories, Vishnu follows Maya through all her transformations, from insect and crawfish up to elephant; for each form she assumes, he takes on the male version of that species, until she ultimately becomes a woman and a goddess, and he becomes a man and a god. The limitations become more refined as the soul becomes purer, but the ring of necessity always hovers at the top.

When the gods in the Norse heaven were unable to bind the Fenris Wolf with steel or with weight of mountains,—the one he snapped and the other he spurned with his heel,—they put round his foot a limp band softer than silk or cobweb, and this held him: the more he spurned it, the stiffer it drew. So soft and so stanch is the ring of Fate. Neither brandy, nor nectar, nor sulphuric ether, nor hell-fire, nor ichor, nor poetry, nor genius, can get rid of this limp band. For if we give it the high sense in which the poets use it, even thought itself is not above Fate: that too must act according to eternal laws, and all that is wilful and fantastic in it is in opposition to its fundamental essence.

When the gods in Norse heaven couldn’t bind the Fenris Wolf with steel or the weight of mountains—the wolf snapped the one and kicked away the other—they wrapped a soft band around his foot, softer than silk or a cobweb, and that held him: the more he struggled, the tighter it became. So soft and yet so strong is the ring of Fate. Neither brandy, nor nectar, nor sulfuric ether, nor hellfire, nor ichor, nor poetry, nor genius, can break this soft band. If we take it in the elevated sense that poets do, even thought itself isn’t above Fate: it too must follow eternal laws, and everything willful and fanciful in it stands against its fundamental essence.

And, last of all, high over thought, in the world of morals, Fate appears as vindicator, levelling the high, lifting the low, requiring justice in man, and always striking soon or late, when justice is not done. What is useful will last; what is hurtful will sink. "The doer must suffer," said the Greeks: "you would soothe a Deity not to be soothed." "God himself cannot procure good for the wicked," said the Welsh triad. "God may consent, but only for a time," said the bard of Spain. The limitation is impassable by any insight of man. In its last and loftiest ascensions, insight itself, and the freedom of the will, is one of its obedient members. But we must not run into generalizations too large, but show the natural bounds or essential distinctions, and seek to do justice to the other elements as well.

And finally, above all thoughts, in the realm of morals, Fate acts as a judge, bringing down the powerful, raising up the powerless, demanding justice from humanity, and always striking sooner or later when justice is overlooked. What is beneficial will endure; what is harmful will fade away. "The doer must suffer," the Greeks said: "you can’t comfort a Deity that doesn’t want to be comforted." "God himself can’t bring about good for the wicked," said the Welsh triad. "God may allow it, but only temporarily," said the bard from Spain. This limitation is something that no human insight can overcome. In its highest and most profound insights, even our understanding and free will are subordinate to this force. However, we shouldn’t be too broad in our generalizations; instead, we should highlight the natural limits or essential distinctions and strive to do justice to the other factors involved as well.

Thus we trace Fate, in matter, mind, and morals,—in race, in retardations of strata, and in thought and character as well. It is everywhere bound or limitation. But Fate has its lord; limitation its limits; is different seen from above and from below; from within and from without. For, though Fate is immense, so is power, which is the other fact in the dual world, immense. If Fate follows and limits power, power attends and antagonizes Fate. We must respect Fate as natural history, but there is more than natural history. For who and what is this criticism that pries into the matter? Man is not order of nature, sack and sack, belly and members, link in a chain, nor any ignominious baggage, but a stupendous antagonism, a dragging together of the poles of the Universe. He betrays his relation to what is below him,—thick-skulled, small-brained, fishy, quadrumanous,—quadruped ill-disguised, hardly escaped into biped, and has paid for the new powers by loss of some of the old ones. But the lightning which explodes and fashions planets, maker of planets and suns, is in him. On one side, elemental order, sandstone and granite, rock-ledges, peat-bog, forest, sea and shore; and, on the other part, thought, the spirit which composes and decomposes nature,—here they are, side by side, god and devil, mind and matter, king and conspirator, belt and spasm, riding peacefully together in the eye and brain of every man.

So we trace Fate in physical things, thoughts, and morals—in race, in the slow progression of layers, and in our understanding and character too. It's everywhere about restraint or limitation. But Fate has a master; limitation has its boundaries; it looks different from above and below, from within and without. For, while Fate is vast, so is power, which is the other reality in this dual world, also immense. If Fate follows and restricts power, power also confronts and challenges Fate. We have to acknowledge Fate as natural history, but there’s more than just natural history. Who or what is this critic that digs into the details? Man isn't just a part of nature, a sack of flesh, organs, and bones, or just a link in a chain, nor some disgraceful burden, but a remarkable struggle, a pulling together of the universe's extremes. He reveals his link to what is beneath him—thick-headed, small-minded, fish-like, four-handed—a clumsy animal barely transformed into a two-legged being, who has traded some of his old powers for new ones. Yet, the lightning that creates and shapes planets, the maker of planets and suns, resides within him. On one side is elemental order: sandstone and granite, rocky ledges, peat bogs, forests, seas, and shores; and on the other side is thought, the spirit that builds up and breaks down nature—here they are, side by side, god and devil, mind and matter, ruler and rebel, harmony and turmoil, peacefully coexisting in the mind and heart of every person.

Nor can he blink the freewill. To hazard the contradiction,—freedom is necessary. If you please to plant yourself on the side of Fate, and say, Fate is all; then we say, a part of Fate is the freedom of man. Forever wells up the impulse of choosing and acting in the soul. Intellect annuls Fate. So far as a man thinks, he is free. And though nothing is more disgusting than the crowing about liberty by slaves, as most men are, and the flippant mistaking for freedom of some paper preamble like a "Declaration of Independence," or the statute right to vote, by those who have never dared to think or to act, yet it is wholesome to man to look not at Fate, but the other way: the practical view is the other. His sound relation to these facts is to use and command, not to cringe to them. "Look not on nature, for her name is fatal," said the oracle. The too much contemplation of these limits induces meanness. They who talk much of destiny, their birth-star, &c., are in a lower dangerous plane, and invite the evils they fear.

Nor can he ignore free will. To put it bluntly—freedom is essential. If you want to side with Fate and say that Fate controls everything, then we say that part of Fate includes human freedom. The drive to choose and act constantly arises within the soul. Intellect undermines Fate. As long as a person thinks, they are free. And though nothing is more off-putting than people who are enslaved bragging about liberty—just like most people are—and the careless confusion of freedom with some paper declaration like a "Declaration of Independence" or the legal right to vote by those who have never dared to think or act, it is beneficial for humanity to look not at Fate, but the other way: the practical perspective is the opposite. His proper relationship to these facts is to use and control them, not to submit to them. "Do not look at nature, for her name is fatal," said the oracle. Overthinking these limits breeds weakness. Those who speak a lot about destiny, their birth star, and so on, find themselves in a lower, more dangerous place and attract the very evils they fear.

I cited the instinctive and heroic races as proud believers in Destiny. They conspire with it; a loving resignation is with the event. But the dogma makes a different impression, when it is held by the weak and lazy. 'Tis weak and vicious people who cast the blame on Fate. The right use of Fate is to bring up our conduct to the loftiness of nature. Rude and invincible except by themselves are the elements. So let man be. Let him empty his breast of his windy conceits, and show his lordship by manners and deeds on the scale of nature. Let him hold his purpose as with the tug of gravitation. No power, no persuasion, no bribe shall make him give up his point. A man ought to compare advantageously with a river, an oak, or a mountain. He shall have not less the flow, the expansion, and the resistance of these.

I mentioned the instinctive and heroic races as proud believers in Destiny. They work with it; a loving acceptance comes with the events. But the belief leaves a different impression when it's held by those who are weak and lazy. It's weak and dishonest people who blame Fate. The right way to use Fate is to elevate our actions to match the greatness of nature. The elements are raw and unstoppable except by themselves. So let man be. Let him clear his mind of his empty thoughts and show his greatness through actions and behavior that align with nature. Let him hold his purpose with the strength of gravity. No power, no persuasion, no bribe should make him change his mind. A man should measure up favorably against a river, an oak, or a mountain. He should embody the flow, the growth, and the resilience of them.

'Tis the best use of Fate to teach a fatal courage. Go face the fire at sea, or the cholera in your friend's house, or the burglar in your own, or what danger lies in the way of duty, knowing you are guarded by the cherubim of Destiny. If you believe in Fate to your harm, believe it, at least, for your good.

It's the best use of Fate to teach courageous acceptance of destiny. Go confront the fire at sea, the cholera in your friend's home, the burglar in your own house, or any danger that stands in the way of your duty, knowing you are protected by the angels of Destiny. If you believe in Fate when it's harmful, at least believe in it when it benefits you.

For, if Fate is so prevailing, man also is part of it, and can confront fate with fate. If the Universe have these savage accidents, our atoms are as savage in resistance. We should be crushed by the atmosphere, but for the reaction of the air within the body. A tube made of a film of glass can resist the shock of the ocean, if filled with the same water. If there be omnipotence in the stroke, there is omnipotence of recoil.

For if fate is so powerful, then humans are part of it and can face fate with their own strength. If the universe has these brutal accidents, our atoms are just as fierce in resistance. We would be crushed by the atmosphere if not for the pressure of the air inside our bodies. A tube made of glass can withstand the force of the ocean if it’s filled with the same water. If there's immense power in the impact, there's also immense power in the rebound.

1. But Fate against Fate is only parrying and defence: there are, also, the noble creative forces. The revelation of Thought takes man out of servitude into freedom. We rightly say of ourselves, we were born, and afterward we were born again, and many times. We have successive experiences so important, that the new forgets the old, and hence the mythology of the seven or the nine heavens. The day of days, the great day of the feast of life, is that in which the inward eye opens to the Unity in things, to the omnipresence of law;—sees that what is must be, and ought to be, or is the best. This beatitude dips from on high down on us, and we see. It is not in us so much as we are in it. If the air come to our lungs, we breathe and live; if not, we die. If the light come to our eyes, we see; else not. And if truth come to our mind, we suddenly expand to its dimensions, as if we grew to worlds. We are as lawgivers; we speak for Nature; we prophesy and divine.

1. But Fate clashing with Fate is just about blocking and defending; there are also the powerful creative forces. The awakening of Thought lifts us from servitude to freedom. We rightfully say about ourselves that we were born, and then we were born again, many times. We have successive experiences that are so significant that the new overshadows the old, giving rise to the mythology of the seven or nine heavens. The greatest day, the grand celebration of life, is when the inner eye opens to the Unity in everything, to the ever-present law; it sees that what is, must be, and ought to be, or is the best. This bliss descends upon us, and we understand. It’s not that it exists within us; instead, we exist within it. If air reaches our lungs, we breathe and live; if not, we die. If light reaches our eyes, we see; otherwise, we don’t. And if truth reaches our mind, we suddenly expand to its scope, as if we grow into new worlds. We are like lawmakers; we speak for Nature; we predict and divine.

This insight throws us on the party and interest of the Universe, against all and sundry; against ourselves, as much as others. A man speaking from insight affirms of himself what is true of the mind: seeing its immortality, he says, I am immortal; seeing its invincibility, he says, I am strong. It is not in us, but we are in it. It is of the maker, not of what is made. All things are touched and changed by it. This uses, and is not used. It distances those who share it, from those who share it not. Those who share it not are flocks and herds. It dates from itself;—not from former men or better men,—gospel, or constitution, or college, or custom. Where it shines, Nature is no longer intrusive, but all things make a musical or pictorial impression. The world of men show like a comedy without laughter:—populations, interests, government, history;—'tis all toy figures in a toy house. It does not overvalue particular truths. We hear eagerly every thought and word quoted from an intellectual man. But, in his presence, our own mind is roused to activity, and we forget very fast what he says, much more interested in the new play of our own thought, than in any thought of his. 'Tis the majesty into which we have suddenly mounted, the impersonality, the scorn of egotisms, the sphere of laws, that engage us. Once we were stepping a little this way, and a little that way; now, we are as men in a balloon, and do not think so much of the point we have left, or the point we would make, as of the liberty and glory of the way.

This insight connects us to the party and interests of the Universe, against everyone and everything; against ourselves just as much as others. A person speaking from insight recognizes the truth about the mind: seeing its immortality, he claims, I am immortal; seeing its invincibility, he states, I am strong. It’s not in us, but we are part of it. It belongs to the creator, not to the creation. Everything is influenced and transformed by it. This force acts, and it does not get acted upon. It separates those who understand it from those who don’t. Those who don’t understand it are like flocks and herds. It originates from itself—not from past men or superior men—gospel, constitution, college, or tradition. Where it shines, Nature is no longer a disturbance, but everything leaves a beautiful or artistic impression. The human world appears like a comedy without laughter: populations, interests, government, history—it's all just play figures in a toy house. It doesn’t give too much importance to specific truths. We eagerly listen to every idea and word quoted from an intellectual person. But in his presence, our own minds become active, and we quickly forget what he says, being much more fascinated by the new flow of our own thoughts than by any of his. It’s the greatness we suddenly experience, the impersonal nature, the disregard for ego, the realm of laws, that captivates us. Once we were taking small steps this way and that; now, we are like people in a hot air balloon, not focusing so much on the point we’ve left behind or the one we aim for, but on the freedom and glory of the journey.

Just as much intellect as you add, so much organic power. He who sees through the design, presides over it, and must will that which must be. We sit and rule, and, though we sleep, our dream will come to pass. Our thought, though it were only an hour old, affirms an oldest necessity, not to be separated from thought, and not to be separated from will. They must always have coexisted. It apprises us of its sovereignty and godhead, which refuse to be severed from it. It is not mine or thine, but the will of all mind. It is poured into the souls of all men, as the soul itself which constitutes them men. I know not whether there be, as is alleged, in the upper region of our atmosphere, a permanent westerly current, which carries with it all atoms which rise to that height, but I see, that when souls reach a certain clearness of perception, they accept a knowledge and motive above selfishness. A breath of will blows eternally through the universe of souls in the direction of the Right and Necessary. It is the air which all intellects inhale and exhale, and it is the wind which blows the worlds into order and orbit.

As much intelligence as you contribute, that's how much organic power you gain. Whoever understands the design controls it and must will what needs to happen. We sit and govern, and even while we sleep, our dreams will come true. Our thoughts, even if they're just an hour old, affirm an ancient necessity that can't be separated from thought or will. They must always coexist. It reminds us of its sovereignty and divinity, which refuse to be detached from it. It doesn’t belong to me or you; it belongs to all minds. It's poured into the souls of every person, like the very essence that makes them human. I’m not sure if there really is, as claimed, a constant westerly current in the higher parts of our atmosphere that carries all atoms that rise to that height, but I see that when souls achieve a certain clarity of perception, they embrace a knowledge and purpose that goes beyond selfishness. A breath of will eternally flows through the universe of souls toward what is Right and Necessary. It’s the air that all intellects breathe in and out, and it’s the wind that organizes and sets the worlds in motion.

Thought dissolves the material universe, by carrying the mind up into a sphere where all is plastic. Of two men, each obeying his own thought, he whose thought is deepest will be the strongest character. Always one man more than another represents the will of Divine Providence to the period.

Thought breaks down the material universe by lifting the mind into a space where everything is flexible. Among two men, each following his own thoughts, the one with the deepest thoughts will be the strongest character. Always, one man more than another embodies the will of Divine Providence for the time.

2. If thought makes free, so does the moral sentiment. The mixtures of spiritual chemistry refuse to be analyzed. Yet we can see that with the perception of truth is joined the desire that it shall prevail. That affection is essential to will. Moreover, when a strong will appears, it usually results from a certain unity of organization, as if the whole energy of body and mind flowed in one direction. All great force is real and elemental. There is no manufacturing a strong will. There must be a pound to balance a pound. Where power is shown in will, it must rest on the universal force. Alaric and Bonaparte must believe they rest on a truth, or their will can be bought or bent. There is a bribe possible for any finite will. But the pure sympathy with universal ends is an infinite force, and cannot be bribed or bent. Whoever has had experience of the moral sentiment cannot choose but believe in unlimited power. Each pulse from that heart is an oath from the Most High. I know not what the word sublime means, if it be not the intimations in this infant of a terrific force. A text of heroism, a name and anecdote of courage, are not arguments, but sallies of freedom. One of these is the verse of the Persian Hafiz, "'Tis written on the gate of Heaven, 'Wo unto him who suffers himself to be betrayed by Fate!'" Does the reading of history make us fatalists? What courage does not the opposite opinion show! A little whim of will to be free gallantly contending against the universe of chemistry.

2. If thought sets us free, then so does our moral intuition. The complex blends of spiritual chemistry can't really be broken down. Still, we can see that along with recognizing the truth comes the desire for it to triumph. That feeling is crucial to our will. Moreover, when a strong will emerges, it often comes from a certain unity of organization, as if the whole energy of body and mind is directed toward one purpose. All great power is genuine and fundamental. You can't just create a strong will. There has to be a balance of force. Where power is evident in will, it must be rooted in universal force. Alaric and Napoleon must believe they're grounded in truth, or else their will can be corrupted or swayed. There's a way to bribe any limited will. But true alignment with universal goals is an infinite power that can't be bribed or twisted. Anyone who has experienced moral intuition can't help but believe in unlimited power. Each pulse from that heart is a vow from the Highest. I don't know what the word sublime means if it doesn't refer to the hints of a tremendous force found in this infant. A tale of heroism, a name, and a story of bravery aren't just arguments; they're bursts of freedom. One such instance is the verse from the Persian Hafiz, "'Tis written on the gate of Heaven, 'Wo unto him who lets himself be deceived by Fate!'" Does studying history make us fatalists? What courage does it take to hold the opposite view! A small whim to be free boldly stands against the entire universe of chemistry.

But insight is not will, nor is affection will. Perception is cold, and goodness dies in wishes; as Voltaire said, 'tis the misfortune of worthy people that they are cowards; "un des plus grands malheurs des honnêtes gens c'est qu'ils sont des lâches." There must be a fusion of these two to generate the energy of will. There can be no driving force, except through the conversion of the man into his will, making him the will, and the will him. And one may say boldly, that no man has a right perception of any truth, who has not been reacted on by it, so as to be ready to be its martyr.

But insight isn’t will, and neither is affection will. Perception is detached, and goodness fades away in mere wishes; as Voltaire said, 'tis the misfortune of good people that they are cowards; "un des plus grands malheurs des honnêtes gens c'est qu'ils sont des lâches." There needs to be a combination of these two to create the energy of will. There can be no driving force without transforming the person into their will, making him the will, and the will him. One can confidently say that no one has a true perception of any truth who hasn’t been affected by it enough to be ready to become its martyr.

The one serious and formidable thing in nature is a will. Society is servile from want of will, and therefore the world wants saviours and religions. One way is right to go: the hero sees it, and moves on that aim, and has the world under him for root and support. He is to others as the world. His approbation is honor; his dissent, infamy. The glance of his eye has the force of sunbeams. A personal influence towers up in memory only worthy, and we gladly forget numbers, money, climate, gravitation, and the rest of Fate.

The only truly serious and powerful thing in nature is will. Society is submissive due to a lack of will, which is why the world needs leaders and belief systems. There’s a clear path to follow: the hero recognizes it and pursues that goal, having the world beneath him for support. To others, he represents the world. His approval is considered honor; his disagreement, disgrace. The look in his eye carries the strength of sunlight. A personal influence stands out in memory as truly valuable, and we willingly forget about numbers, money, weather, gravity, and everything else that fate brings.

We can afford to allow the limitation, if we know it is the meter of the growing man. We stand against Fate, as children stand up against the wall in their father's house, and notch their height from year to year. But when the boy grows to man, and is master of the house, he pulls down that wall, and builds a new and bigger. 'Tis only a question of time. Every brave youth is in training to ride and rule this dragon. His science is to make weapons and wings of these passions and retarding forces. Now whether, seeing these two things, fate and power, we are permitted to believe in unity? The bulk of mankind believe in two gods. They are under one dominion here in the house, as friend and parent, in social circles, in letters, in art, in love, in religion: but in mechanics, in dealing with steam and climate, in trade, in politics, they think they come under another; and that it would be a practical blunder to transfer the method and way of working of one sphere, into the other. What good, honest, generous men at home, will be wolves and foxes on change! What pious men in the parlor will vote for what reprobates at the polls! To a certain point, they believe themselves the care of a Providence. But, in a steamboat, in an epidemic, in war, they believe a malignant energy rules.

We can accept the limitation if we know it's part of growing up. We push back against Fate, like children measure their height against the wall in their father's house year after year. But when a boy grows into a man and takes charge, he tears down that wall and builds something bigger and better. It's just a matter of time. Every courageous young person is preparing to ride and control this beast. Their skill lies in turning these passions and obstacles into tools and wings. Now, knowing these two forces—fate and power—are we allowed to believe in unity? Most people believe in two gods. Here at home, they are under one roof, as friends and parents, in social settings, in literature, in art, in love, in religion. But when it comes to machines, managing steam and climate, in business, in politics, they think they're subject to another power and that it would be foolish to apply methods from one area to another. What good, honest, kind men at home turn into wolves and foxes in trade! What devout individuals in their living rooms will support immoral candidates at the polls! To some extent, they believe they're under the protection of a higher power. But in a steamboat, during an epidemic, or in war, they think a malevolent force is in control.

But relation and connection are not somewhere and sometimes, but everywhere and always. The divine order does not stop where their sight stops. The friendly power works on the same rules, in the next farm, and the next planet. But, where they have not experience, they run against it, and hurt themselves. Fate, then, is a name for facts not yet passed under the fire of thought;—for causes which are impenetrated.

But relationships and connections aren't just in certain places or times; they're everywhere and all the time. The divine order doesn't halt where people's vision ends. The friendly force operates under the same principles, whether it's at the next farm or the next planet. However, when people encounter what they don't understand, they can struggle against it and harm themselves. Fate is just a term for facts that haven’t been examined thoughtfully yet—it's for causes that haven't been understood.

But every jet of chaos which threatens to exterminate us, is convertible by intellect into wholesome force. Fate is unpenetrated causes. The water drowns ship and sailor, like a grain of dust. But learn to swim, trim your bark, and the wave which drowned it, will be cloven by it, and carry it, like its own foam, a plume and a power. The cold is inconsiderate of persons, tingles your blood, freezes a man like a dew-drop. But learn to skate, and the ice will give you a graceful, sweet, and poetic motion. The cold will brace your limbs and brain to genius, and make you foremost men of time. Cold and sea will train an imperial Saxon race, which nature cannot bear to lose, and, after cooping it up for a thousand years in yonder England, gives a hundred Englands, a hundred Mexicos. All the bloods it shall absorb and domineer: and more than Mexicos,—the secrets of water and steam, the spasms of electricity, the ductility of metals, the chariot of the air, the ruddered balloon are awaiting you.

But every burst of chaos that threatens to wipe us out can be transformed by our minds into positive energy. Fate consists of unknown causes. Water drowns both ship and sailor, just like a speck of dust. But if you learn to swim and adjust your vessel, the wave that once swallowed it will part for you and carry you, like its own foam, as a plume and a force. The cold does not consider individuals; it chills your blood and freezes a person like a dewdrop. But if you learn to skate, the ice will offer you a graceful, sweet, and poetic movement. The cold will strengthen your limbs and mind, driving you to greatness and making you leaders of your time. Cold and sea will create a powerful Saxon race that nature cannot afford to lose, and after confining it in England for a thousand years, it will produce a hundred Englands, a hundred Mexicos. All the bloodlines it will absorb and dominate: and beyond Mexicos—the mysteries of water and steam, the bursts of electricity, the flexibility of metals, the chariot of the air, and the steered balloon are waiting for you.

The annual slaughter from typhus far exceeds that of war; but right drainage destroys typhus. The plague in the sea-service from scurvy is healed by lemon juice and other diets portable or procurable: the depopulation by cholera and small-pox is ended by drainage and vaccination; and every other pest is not less in the chain of cause and effect, and may be fought off. And, whilst art draws out the venom, it commonly extorts some benefit from the vanquished enemy. The mischievous torrent is taught to drudge for man: the wild beasts he makes useful for food, or dress, or labor; the chemic explosions are controlled like his watch. These are now the steeds on which he rides. Man moves in all modes, by legs of horses, by wings of wind, by steam, by gas of balloon, by electricity, and stands on tiptoe threatening to hunt the eagle in his own element. There's nothing he will not make his carrier.

The annual death toll from typhus is far greater than that from war, but proper drainage eliminates typhus. The plague in the navy caused by scurvy can be treated with lemon juice and other available diets: the deaths from cholera and smallpox can be addressed with drainage and vaccinations; and every other disease is similarly linked in cause and effect, and can be fought against. And while science extracts the toxins, it often gains some advantage from the defeated foe. The dangerous floods are harnessed to work for humans: the wild animals are used for food, clothing, or labor; chemical reactions are controlled like a watch. These are now the horses on which he rides. Humanity moves in every way, using horse legs, the wind’s wings, steam, balloon gas, electricity, and stands on tiptoe, ready to hunt the eagle in its own territory. There’s nothing he won’t make serve him.

Steam was, till the other day, the devil which we dreaded. Every pot made by any human potter or brazier had a hole in its cover, to let off the enemy, lest he should lift pot and roof, and carry the house away. But the Marquis of Worcester, Watt, and Fulton bethought themselves, that, where was power, was not devil, but was God; that it must be availed of, and not by any means let off and wasted. Could he lift pots and roofs and houses so handily? he was the workman they were in search of. He could be used to lift away, chain, and compel other devils, far more reluctant and dangerous, namely, cubic miles of earth, mountains, weight or resistance of water, machinery, and the labors of all men in the world; and time he shall lengthen, and shorten space.

Steam was, until recently, the enemy we feared. Every pot made by any potter or metalworker had a hole in its lid to let the threat escape, to prevent it from lifting pot and roof and carrying the whole house away. But the Marquis of Worcester, Watt, and Fulton realized that where there was power, there wasn’t evil—it was something divine; it needed to be harnessed, not wasted. If it could lift pots, roofs, and houses so easily, then it was the solution they were looking for. It could be used to lift, bind, and control even greater threats—massive amounts of earth, mountains, the weight of water, machinery, and the work of all the people in the world; and it could extend time and reduce distance.

It has not fared much otherwise with higher kinds of steam. The opinion of the million was the terror of the world, and it was attempted, either to dissipate it, by amusing nations, or to pile it over with strata of society,—a layer of soldiers; over that, a layer of lords; and a king on the top; with clamps and hoops of castles, garrisons, and police. But, sometimes, the religious principle would get in, and burst the hoops, and rive every mountain laid on top of it. The Fultons and Watts of politics, believing in unity, saw that it was a power, and, by satisfying it, (as justice satisfies everybody,) through a different disposition of society,—grouping it on a level, instead of piling it into a mountain,—they have contrived to make of this terror the most harmless and energetic form of a State.

It hasn’t gone much differently with more advanced forms of steam. The opinion of the masses was the fear of the world, and attempts were made to either divert it by entertaining nations or to cover it up with layers of society—a layer of soldiers, above that, a layer of lords, and a king on top; surrounded by the confines of castles, garrisons, and police. But sometimes the religious principle would break through, bursting the confines and tearing apart every obstacle placed on it. The Fultons and Watts of politics, who believed in unity, recognized it as a force, and by addressing it (just as justice addresses everyone), through a different structuring of society—organizing it on a level instead of stacking it up into a mountain—they managed to turn this fear into the most harmless and dynamic form of a State.

Very odious, I confess, are the lessons of Fate. Who likes to have a dapper phrenologist pronouncing on his fortunes? Who likes to believe that he has hidden in his skull, spine, and pelvis, all the vices of a Saxon or Celtic race, which will be sure to pull him down,—with what grandeur of hope and resolve he is fired,—into a selfish, huckstering, servile, dodging animal? A learned physician tells us, the fact is invariable with the Neapolitan, that, when mature, he assumes the forms of the unmistakable scoundrel. That is a little overstated,—but may pass.

The lessons from Fate are really unpleasant, I admit. Who enjoys having a slick phrenologist predict their future? Who wants to believe that lurking in their skull, spine, and pelvis are all the flaws of a Saxon or Celtic race that will inevitably drag them down—no matter how grand their hopes and determination might be—into a selfish, scheming, servile, evasive creature? A knowledgeable doctor tells us that it's a constant with Neapolitans that, once they mature, they take on the traits of a clear scoundrel. That's a bit of an exaggeration—but it might be acceptable.

But these are magazines and arsenals. A man must thank his defects, and stand in some terror of his talents. A transcendent talent draws so largely on his forces, as to lame him; a defect pays him revenues on the other side. The sufferance, which is the badge of the Jew, has made him, in these days, the ruler of the rulers of the earth. If Fate is ore and quarry, if evil is good in the making, if limitation is power that shall be, if calamities, oppositions, and weights are wings and means,—we are reconciled.

But these are magazines and arsenals. A person must appreciate their flaws and feel some fear of their talents. An extraordinary talent demands so much from someone that it weakens them; a flaw provides them with benefits instead. The endurance, which is a mark of the Jew, has made him, in these times, the ruler of the rulers of the earth. If Fate is raw material and a mine, if evil is good in the making, if limitations are potential power that will come, if hardships, challenges, and burdens are actually wings and tools—we find peace in that.

Fate involves the melioration. No statement of the Universe can have any soundness, which does not admit its ascending effort. The direction of the whole, and of the parts, is toward benefit, and in proportion to the health. Behind every individual, closes organization: before him, opens liberty,—the Better, the Best. The first and worst races are dead. The second and imperfect races are dying out, or remain for the maturing of higher. In the latest race, in man, every generosity, every new perception, the love and praise he extorts from his fellows, are certificates of advance out of fate into freedom. Liberation of the will from the sheaths and clogs of organization which he has outgrown, is the end and aim of this world. Every calamity is a spur and valuable hint; and where his endeavors do not yet fully avail, they tell as tendency. The whole circle of animal life,—tooth against tooth,—devouring war, war for food, a yelp of pain and a grunt of triumph, until, at last, the whole menagerie, the whole chemical mass is mellowed and refined for higher use,—pleases at a sufficient perspective.

Fate involves improvement. No statement about the Universe can be valid if it doesn't acknowledge its upward movement. Everything, both as a whole and in parts, is directed toward benefit, and this is proportional to its health. Behind every individual is organization; in front of them lies freedom—the Better, the Best. The first and worst races have perished. The second and imperfect races are fading away or are waiting for the emergence of something greater. In the latest race, humanity, every act of kindness, every new understanding, the love and admiration he earns from others, are signs of progress from fate into freedom. The liberation of will from the constraints and limitations of an outdated organization is the goal of this world. Every disaster serves as a motivation and a valuable lesson; and where his efforts haven't yet achieved full success, they indicate a direction. The entire cycle of animal life—predator against prey—consisting of consuming battles, struggles for food, cries of pain, and sounds of victory, ultimately leads to the entire ecosystem, the entire chemical composition being matured and refined for a higher purpose, viewed from a broader perspective.

But to see how fate slides into freedom, and freedom into fate, observe how far the roots of every creature run, or find, if you can, a point where there is no thread of connection. Our life is consentaneous and far-related. This knot of nature is so well tied, that nobody was ever cunning enough to find the two ends. Nature is intricate, overlapped, interweaved, and endless. Christopher Wren said of the beautiful King's College chapel, "that, if anybody would tell him where to lay the first stone, he would build such another." But where shall we find the first atom in this house of man, which is all consent, inosculation, and balance of parts?

But to see how fate blends into freedom, and freedom into fate, notice how deep the roots of every creature go, or try to find, if you can, a point where there’s no connection. Our lives are interconnected and related in many ways. This knot of nature is tied so well that nobody has ever been clever enough to find the two ends. Nature is complex, intertwined, layered, and endless. Christopher Wren once said about the beautiful King's College chapel, "that, if anyone could tell him where to place the first stone, he would build another just like it." But where can we find the first atom in this house of humanity, which is all about connection, fusion, and balance of parts?

The web of relation is shown in habitat, shown in hybernation. When hybernation was observed, it was found, that, whilst some animals became torpid in winter, others were torpid in summer: hybernation then was a false name. The long sleep is not an effect of cold, but is regulated by the supply of food proper to the animal. It becomes torpid when the fruit or prey it lives on is not in season, and regains its activity when its food is ready.

The web of relationships is illustrated in habitat, depicted in hibernation. When hibernation was studied, it was discovered that while some animals become inactive in winter, others become inactive in summer: hibernation was then a misleading term. The long sleep isn’t caused by the cold but is influenced by the availability of appropriate food for the animal. It becomes inactive when the fruit or prey it depends on is out of season and becomes active again when its food is available.

Eyes are found in light; ears in auricular air; feet on land; fins in water; wings in air; and, each creature where it was meant to be, with a mutual fitness. Every zone has its own Fauna. There is adjustment between the animal and its food, its parasite, its enemy. Balances are kept. It is not allowed to diminish in numbers, nor to exceed. The like adjustments exist for man. His food is cooked, when he arrives; his coal in the pit; the house ventilated; the mud of the deluge dried; his companions arrived at the same hour, and awaiting him with love, concert, laughter, and tears. These are coarse adjustments, but the invisible are not less. There are more belongings to every creature than his air and his food. His instincts must be met, and he has predisposing power that bends and fits what is near him to his use. He is not possible until the invisible things are right for him, as well as the visible. Of what changes, then, in sky and earth, and in finer skies and earths, does the appearance of some Dante or Columbus apprise us!

Eyes are found in light; ears in the air; feet on land; fins in water; wings in the sky; and each creature is where it’s meant to be, perfectly suited to its environment. Every region has its own wildlife. There’s a balance between animals and their food, parasites, and predators. Populations are kept in check; they can’t decline too much or grow too large. The same adjustments exist for humans. Their food is prepared when they arrive; coal is in the furnace; the house is ventilated; floodwaters are dried up; their friends arrive at the same time, ready to greet them with love, music, laughter, and tears. These are basic adjustments, but the unseen ones are just as important. Every creature has more needs than just air and food. Their instincts must be fulfilled, and they have an innate ability to shape and adapt what’s around them for their benefit. They cannot thrive until both the visible and invisible factors are right for them. What transformations, then, in the skies and the earth, and in the finer realms of existence, do the appearances of figures like Dante or Columbus reveal to us!

How is this effected? Nature is no spendthrift, but takes the shortest way to her ends. As the general says to his soldiers, "if you want a fort, build a fort," so nature makes every creature do its own work and get its living,—is it planet, animal, or tree. The planet makes itself. The animal cell makes itself;—then, what it wants. Every creature,—wren or dragon,—shall make its own lair. As soon as there is life, there is self-direction, and absorbing and using of material. Life is freedom,—life in the direct ratio of its amount. You may be sure, the new-born man is not inert. Life works both voluntarily and supernaturally in its neighborhood. Do you suppose, he can be estimated by his weight in pounds, or, that he is contained in his skin,—this reaching, radiating, jaculating fellow? The smallest candle fills a mile with its rays, and the papillæ of a man run out to every star.

How is this accomplished? Nature isn't wasteful, but takes the quickest route to her goals. As the general tells his soldiers, "If you want a fort, build a fort," nature makes every creature do its own work and earn its living—whether it’s a planet, an animal, or a tree. The planet creates itself. The animal cell creates itself; then it gets what it needs. Every creature—whether a wren or a dragon—will make its own home. As soon as there is life, there is self-direction, and the ability to absorb and use materials. Life is freedom—life in direct proportion to its quantity. You can be sure that a newborn man is not passive. Life operates both voluntarily and beyond the ordinary in its surroundings. Do you think he can be measured by his weight in pounds, or that he is limited to his skin—this reaching, radiating, energetic being? The smallest candle can light up a mile with its glow, and the small structures on a man's skin extend out to every star.

When there is something to be done, the world knows how to get it done. The vegetable eye makes leaf, pericarp, root, bark, or thorn, as the need is; the first cell converts itself into stomach, mouth, nose, or nail, according to the want: the world throws its life into a hero or a shepherd; and puts him where he is wanted. Dante and Columbus were Italians, in their time: they would be Russians or Americans to-day. Things ripen, new men come. The adaptation is not capricious. The ulterior aim, the purpose beyond itself, the correlation by which planets subside and crystallize, then animate beasts and men, will not stop, but will work into finer particulars, and from finer to finest.

When there's something that needs to be done, the world knows how to get it done. The plant kingdom creates leaves, fruit, roots, bark, or thorns as needed; the first cell transforms into a stomach, mouth, nose, or nail, depending on what’s required. The world channels its energy into a hero or a shepherd and places them where they’re needed. Dante and Columbus were Italians in their time; today they'd be Russians or Americans. Things mature, new people arrive. This adaptation isn’t random. The deeper goal, the purpose beyond itself, the way planets settle and form, then give life to animals and humans, won’t cease but will evolve into more specific details, and from more specific to the most detailed.

The secret of the world is, the tie between person and event. Person makes event, and event person. The "times," "the age," what is that, but a few profound persons and a few active persons who epitomize the times?—Goethe, Hegel, Metternich, Adams, Calhoun, Guizot, Peel, Cobden, Kossuth, Rothschild, Astor, Brunel, and the rest. The same fitness must be presumed between a man and the time and event, as between the sexes, or between a race of animals and the food it eats, or the inferior races it uses. He thinks his fate alien, because the copula is hidden. But the soul contains the event that shall befall it, for the event is only the actualization of its thoughts; and what we pray to ourselves for is always granted. The event is the print of your form. It fits you like your skin. What each does is proper to him. Events are the children of his body and mind. We learn that the soul of Fate is the soul of us, as Hafiz sings,

The secret of the world is the connection between people and events. People create events, and events shape people. What do we mean by "the times" or "the age"? They are just a few significant individuals and active people who define the era—like Goethe, Hegel, Metternich, Adams, Calhoun, Guizot, Peel, Cobden, Kossuth, Rothschild, Astor, Brunel, and others. There’s a similar connection between a person and their time or event, just like there is between genders, or between a species and the food it consumes, or the lesser species it relies on. He believes his destiny is separate because the connection isn’t obvious. But the soul holds the event that is destined for it, as the event is merely the realization of its thoughts; and what we truly wish for from ourselves is always granted. The event is the imprint of your essence. It fits you like your skin. What each person does is suited to them. Events are the offspring of their body and mind. We learn that the essence of Fate is our essence, as Hafiz expresses.

Alas! till now I had not known,
My guide and fortune's guide are one.
Unfortunately! Until now, I didn't realize,
My guide and luck's guide are the same.

All the toys that infatuate men, and which they play for,—houses, land, money, luxury, power, fame, are the selfsame thing, with a new gauze or two of illusion overlaid. And of all the drums and rattles by which men are made willing to have their heads broke, and are led out solemnly every morning to parade,—the most admirable is this by which we are brought to believe that events are arbitrary, and independent of actions. At the conjuror's, we detect the hair by which he moves his puppet, but we have not eyes sharp enough to descry the thread that ties cause and effect.

All the things that captivate men—houses, land, money, luxury, power, fame—are all the same, just wrapped in different illusions. And of all the distractions that make men willing to suffer consequences and take to the streets in procession every morning, the most remarkable is the one that convinces us that events are random and not connected to our actions. At a magician's show, we can see the string that moves the puppet, but we don't have the insight to see the thread that links cause and effect.

Nature magically suits the man to his fortunes, by making these the fruit of his character. Ducks take to the water, eagles to the sky, waders to the sea margin, hunters to the forest, clerks to counting-rooms, soldiers to the frontier. Thus events grow on the same stem with persons; are sub-persons. The pleasure of life is according to the man that lives it, and not according to the work or the place. Life is an ecstasy. We know what madness belongs to love,—what power to paint a vile object in hues of heaven. As insane persons are indifferent to their dress, diet, and other accommodations, and, as we do in dreams, with equanimity, the most absurd acts, so, a drop more of wine in our cup of life will reconcile us to strange company and work. Each creature puts forth from itself its own condition and sphere, as the slug sweats out its slimy house on the pear-leaf, and the woolly aphides on the apple perspire their own bed, and the fish its shell. In youth, we clothe ourselves with rainbows, and go as brave as the zodiac. In age, we put out another sort of perspiration,—gout, fever, rheumatism, caprice, doubt, fretting, and avarice.

Nature magically adapts people to their circumstances by making those circumstances a reflection of their character. Ducks love the water, eagles soar in the sky, waders hang out by the shore, hunters roam the forest, clerks work in offices, and soldiers guard the borders. Events grow alongside individuals; they are interconnected. The joy of life comes from the individual experiencing it, not from the task or the location. Life can be euphoric. We understand the madness that comes with love—how it can transform something ugly into something beautiful. Just as people who are mentally unwell don’t care about their clothing, food, or other comforts and, like in dreams, calmly engage in the most ridiculous actions, so too will a bit more wine in our cup of life help us accept unusual company and tasks. Each being expresses its own nature and environment, like a slug secreting its slimy shell on a leaf, woolly aphids leaving their soft homes on apples, and fish creating their own protective shells. In our youth, we dress in vibrant colors and carry ourselves boldly like the constellations. In old age, we exude a different kind of essence—gout, fever, rheumatism, whims, uncertainty, anxiety, and greed.

A man's fortunes are the fruit of his character. A man's friends are his magnetisms. We go to Herodotus and Plutarch for examples of Fate; but we are examples. "Quisque suos patimur manes." The tendency of every man to enact all that is in his constitution is expressed in the old belief, that the efforts which we make to escape from our destiny only serve to lead us into it: and I have noticed, a man likes better to be complimented on his position, as the proof of the last or total excellence, than on his merits.

A man's success comes from his character. A man's friends are like magnets. We look to Herodotus and Plutarch for examples of fate; but we are living examples ourselves. "Quisque suos patimur manes." The idea that each person inevitably fulfills what's in their nature is captured in the old saying that the more we try to escape our fate, the more it pulls us in. I've noticed that a man prefers to be praised for his position as proof of overall excellence rather than for his individual merits.

A man will see his character emitted in the events that seem to meet, but which exude from and accompany him. Events expand with the character. As once he found himself among toys, so now he plays a part in colossal systems, and his growth is declared in his ambition, his companions, and his performance. He looks like a piece of luck, but is a piece of causation;—the mosaic, angulated and ground to fit into the gap he fills. Hence in each town there is some man who is, in his brain and performance, an explanation of the tillage, production, factories, banks, churches, ways of living, and society, of that town. If you do not chance to meet him, all that you see will leave you a little puzzled: if you see him, it will become plain. We know in Massachusetts who built New Bedford, who built Lynn, Lowell, Lawrence, Clinton, Fitchburg, Holyoke, Portland, and many another noisy mart. Each of these men, if they were transparent, would seem to you not so much men, as walking cities, and, wherever you put them, they would build one.

A man reveals his character through the events that seem to surround him, but which actually come from and follow him. Events grow alongside his character. Just as he once found himself playing with toys, he now plays a role in large systems, and his development is shown in his ambitions, his friends, and his actions. He may seem like a stroke of luck, but he is really a result of causes—like a piece in a mosaic, shaped and fitted into the space he occupies. Therefore, in every town, there exists a person who, through their thoughts and actions, explains the farming, production, factories, banks, churches, lifestyles, and community of that town. If you don’t happen to meet him, everything you see will leave you somewhat confused; if you do meet him, it will all become clear. We know in Massachusetts who built New Bedford, who built Lynn, Lowell, Lawrence, Clinton, Fitchburg, Holyoke, Portland, and many other bustling places. Each of these men, if they could be seen clearly, would appear not just as individuals, but as living cities, and wherever you placed them, they would create one.

History is the action and reaction of these two,—Nature and Thought;—two boys pushing each other on the curb-stone of the pavement. Everything is pusher or pushed: and matter and mind are in perpetual tilt and balance, so. Whilst the man is weak, the earth takes up him. He plants his brain and affections. By and by he will take up the earth, and have his gardens and vineyards in the beautiful order and productiveness of his thought. Every solid in the universe is ready to become fluid on the approach of the mind, and the power to flux it is the measure of the mind. If the wall remain adamant, it accuses the want of thought. To a subtler force, it will stream into new forms, expressive of the character of the mind. What is the city in which we sit here, but an aggregate of incongruous materials, which have obeyed the will of some man? The granite was reluctant, but his hands were stronger, and it came. Iron was deep in the ground, and well combined with stone; but could not hide from his fires. Wood, lime, stuffs, fruits, gums, were dispersed over the earth and sea, in vain. Here they are, within reach of every man's day-labor,—what he wants of them. The whole world is the flux of matter over the wires of thought to the poles or points where it would build. The races of men rise out of the ground preoccupied with a thought which rules them, and divided into parties ready armed and angry to fight for this metaphysical abstraction. The quality of the thought differences the Egyptian and the Roman, the Austrian and the American. The men who come on the stage at one period are all found to be related to each other. Certain ideas are in the air. We are all impressionable, for we are made of them; all impressionable, but some more than others, and these first express them. This explains the curious contemporaneousness of inventions and discoveries. The truth is in the air, and the most impressionable brain will announce it first, but all will announce it a few minutes later. So women, as most susceptible, are the best index of the coming hour. So the great man, that is, the man most imbued with the spirit of the time, is the impressionable man,—of a fibre irritable and delicate, like iodine to light. He feels the infinitesimal attractions. His mind is righter than others, because he yields to a current so feeble as can be felt only by a needle delicately poised.

History is the constant interaction between two forces—Nature and Thought—like two boys pushing each other on the edge of the sidewalk. Everything either pushes or gets pushed: matter and mind are always in a state of balance. When a person is weak, the earth supports him. He invests his intellect and emotions. Eventually, he will shape the earth, creating his gardens and vineyards in the beautiful arrangement and productivity of his thoughts. Every solid object in the universe is ready to become fluid when approached by the mind, and the ability to transform it is a measure of one's intellect. If a wall remains unyielding, it highlights a lack of thought. With a subtler force, it will flow into new forms that reflect the character of the mind. What is the city we inhabit but a collection of mismatched materials that obey a person's will? The granite was resistant, but his hands were stronger, and it yielded. Iron was buried deep within the earth, mixed with stone, but couldn't escape his fires. Wood, lime, materials, fruits, and resins were scattered over the earth and sea in vain. Now they are here, within reach of every man's daily labor—whatever he needs from them. The entire world is the flow of matter shaped by the currents of thought to the destinations where it aims to build. Human races emerge from the ground carrying a thought that governs them, divided into factions ready and willing to fight for this abstract idea. The nature of the thought distinguishes the Egyptian from the Roman, the Austrian from the American. The individuals who emerge at any given time are all interrelated. Certain ideas are in the air. We are all impressionable, as we are made of them; everyone is impressionable, but some more than others, and those express them first. This accounts for the intriguing simultaneousness of inventions and discoveries. The truth is in the atmosphere, and the most impressionable mind will express it first, although everyone will do so shortly after. Similarly, women, being the most susceptible, are the best indicators of what’s coming next. Thus, the great man—one most in tune with the spirit of the time—is the impressionable man, with a sensitive and delicate nature, like iodine reacting to light. He perceives the tiniest attractions. His mind is more accurate than others because he responds to a current so weak that it can only be sensed by a carefully balanced needle.

The correlation is shown in defects. Möller, in his Essay on Architecture, taught that the building which was fitted accurately to answer its end, would turn out to be beautiful, though beauty had not been intended. I find the like unity in human structures rather virulent and pervasive; that a crudity in the blood will appear in the argument; a hump in the shoulder will appear in the speech and handiwork. If his mind could be seen, the hump would be seen. If a man has a seesaw in his voice, it will run into his sentences, into his poem, into the structure of his fable, into his speculation, into his charity. And, as every man is hunted by his own dæmon, vexed by his own disease, this checks all his activity.

The connection is evident in flaws. Möller, in his Essay on Architecture, taught that a building designed to effectively serve its purpose would be beautiful, even if beauty wasn't the goal. I notice a similar unity in human creations, which can be quite harsh and widespread; any roughness in one's character will show in their arguments; a flaw in one's posture will show in their speech and work. If we could see someone's mind, we’d notice those flaws as well. If a person has an uneven rhythm in their voice, it will translate into their sentences, their poetry, their stories, and their thoughts. And, since each person is pursued by their own inner demons and troubled by their own afflictions, this hinders all their efforts.

So each man, like each plant, has his parasites. A strong, astringent, bilious nature has more truculent enemies than the slugs and moths that fret my leaves. Such an one has curculios, borers, knife-worms: a swindler ate him first, then a client, then a quack, then smooth, plausible gentlemen, bitter and selfish as Moloch.

So each person, like each plant, has their parasites. A strong, sharp, and fierce nature attracts more aggressive enemies than the slugs and moths that ruin my leaves. This person has weevils, borers, and knife-worms: a con artist exploited him first, then a client, then a fraud, then charming, deceptive men, bitter and selfish like Moloch.

This correlation really existing can be divined. If the threads are there, thought can follow and show them. Especially when a soul is quick and docile; as Chaucer sings,

This correlation really exists and can be understood. If the connections are there, thought can follow and reveal them. Especially when a soul is quick and receptive; as Chaucer sings,

"Or if the soul of proper kind
Be so perfect as men find,
That it wot what is to come,
And that he warneth all and some
Of every of their aventures,
By previsions or figures;
But that our flesh hath not might
It to understand aright
For it is warned too darkly."—
"Or if a truly good soul
is as perfect as people say,
knowing what’s to come,
and warning everyone
about their future experiences,
through visions or signs;
But our flesh lacks the ability
to fully understand it
because the warnings are too vague."—

Some people are made up of rhyme, coincidence, omen, periodicity, and presage: they meet the person they seek; what their companion prepares to say to them, they first say to him; and a hundred signs apprise them of what is about to befall.

Some people are made of rhyme, coincidence, omens, patterns, and premonitions: they find the person they’re looking for; they say what their companion is about to say first; and countless signs alert them to what’s about to happen.

Wonderful intricacy in the web, wonderful constancy in the design this vagabond life admits. We wonder how the fly finds its mate, and yet year after year we find two men, two women, without legal or carnal tie, spend a great part of their best time within a few feet of each other. And the moral is, that what we seek we shall find; what we flee from flees from us; as Goethe said, "what we wish for in youth, comes in heaps on us in old age," too often cursed with the granting of our prayer: and hence the high caution, that, since we are sure of having what we wish, we beware to ask only for high things.

The web is wonderfully intricate, and this wandering life shows remarkable consistency in its design. We often wonder how a fly finds its partner, yet every year we see two men or two women, with no legal or physical connection, spending a large part of their best days just a few feet apart. The lesson here is that we will find what we seek; what we run from will also run from us. As Goethe said, "what we desire in our youth, comes back to us in abundance in old age," often accompanied by the curse of having our prayers answered. Thus, we should be cautious, knowing we are bound to get what we wish for. We should only ask for great things.

One key, one solution to the mysteries of human condition, one solution to the old knots of fate, freedom, and foreknowledge, exists, the propounding, namely, of the double consciousness. A man must ride alternately on the horses of his private and his public nature, as the equestrians in the circus throw themselves nimbly from horse to horse, or plant one foot on the back of one, and the other foot on the back of the other. So when a man is the victim of his fate, has sciatica in his loins, and cramp in his mind; a club-foot and a club in his wit; a sour face, and a selfish temper; a strut in his gait, and a conceit in his affection; or is ground to powder by the vice of his race; he is to rally on his relation to the Universe, which his ruin benefits. Leaving the dæmon who suffers, he is to take sides with the Deity who secures universal benefit by his pain.

One key, one answer to the mysteries of the human experience, one way to untangle the old knots of destiny, freedom, and foresight, is the idea of double consciousness. A person has to switch between their private and public selves, just like performers in a circus who skillfully jump from one horse to another, or balance on the backs of two horses at once. So when someone is trapped by their fate, feels pain in their body and confusion in their mind; carries burdens in both spirit and intellect; has a grim expression and a self-centered attitude; walks with an air of superiority, yet holds deep insecurities; or feels crushed by the flaws of their background, they need to reconnect with their place in the Universe, which their struggles ultimately serve. By leaving behind the part of them that suffers, they should ally with the greater force that brings universal good out of their pain.

To offset the drag of temperament and race, which pulls down, learn this lesson, namely, that by the cunning co-presence of two elements, which is throughout nature, whatever lames or paralyzes you, draws in with it the divinity, in some form, to repay. A good intention clothes itself with sudden power. When a god wishes to ride, any chip or pebble will bud and shoot out winged feet, and serve him for a horse.

To balance out the heaviness of mood and background, which can weigh you down, remember this: through the clever combination of two elements, present in nature everywhere, whatever holds you back also brings along some form of divine energy to compensate. A good intention suddenly gains strength. When a god wants to ride, even a small piece of wood or a stone can sprout wings and become a horse for him.

Let us build altars to the Blessed Unity which holds nature and souls in perfect solution, and compels every atom to serve an universal end. I do not wonder at a snow-flake, a shell, a summer landscape, or the glory of the stars; but at the necessity of beauty under which the universe lies; that all is and must be pictorial; that the rainbow, and the curve of the horizon, and the arch of the blue vault are only results from the organism of the eye. There is no need for foolish amateurs to fetch me to admire a garden of flowers, or a sun-gilt cloud, or a waterfall, when I cannot look without seeing splendor and grace. How idle to choose a random sparkle here or there, when the indwelling necessity plants the rose of beauty on the brow of chaos, and discloses the central intention of Nature to be harmony and joy.

Let’s create altars to the Blessed Unity that connects nature and souls perfectly, making every atom work toward a universal purpose. I’m not amazed by a snowflake, a shell, a summer landscape, or the beauty of the stars; rather, I’m in awe of the necessity of beauty that the universe embodies. Everything is and must be visual; the rainbow, the curve of the horizon, and the arch of the blue sky are just outcomes of how our eyes perceive. There's no reason for casual onlookers to bring me to admire a garden of flowers, a sunlit cloud, or a waterfall when I can't look without seeing splendor and grace. It’s pointless to pick a random sparkle here or there when the inherent need places the rose of beauty amidst chaos, revealing Nature’s central aim as harmony and joy.

Let us build altars to the Beautiful Necessity. If we thought men were free in the sense, that, in a single exception one fantastical will could prevail over the law of things, it were all one as if a child's hand could pull down the sun. If, in the least particular, one could derange the order of nature,—who would accept the gift of life?

Let’s create altars to the Beautiful Necessity. If we believed that people were free in the sense that, in one rare case, a whimsical desire could override the laws of nature, it would be as if a child’s hand could bring down the sun. If, in any way, someone could disrupt the order of nature—who would want to accept the gift of life?

Let us build altars to the Beautiful Necessity, which secures that all is made of one piece; that plaintiff and defendant, friend and enemy, animal and planet, food and eater, are of one kind. In astronomy, is vast space, but no foreign system; in geology, vast time, but the same laws as to-day. Why should we be afraid of Nature, which is no other than "philosophy and theology embodied"? Why should we fear to be crushed by savage elements, we who are made up of the same elements? Let us build to the Beautiful Necessity, which makes man brave in believing that he cannot shun a danger that is appointed, nor incur one that is not; to the Necessity which rudely or softly educates him to the perception that there are no contingencies; that Law rules throughout existence, a Law which is not intelligent but intelligence,—not personal nor impersonal,—it disdains words and passes understanding; it dissolves persons; it vivifies nature; yet solicits the pure in heart to draw on all its omnipotence.

Let’s create altars to the Beautiful Necessity, which ensures that everything is interconnected; that plaintiff and defendant, friend and enemy, animal and planet, food and eater, are all of one kind. In astronomy, there's vast space, but no separate systems; in geology, there's vast time, but the same laws as today. Why should we be afraid of Nature, which is simply "philosophy and theology made real"? Why should we fear being overwhelmed by wild elements, when we are made of the same substances? Let’s honor the Beautiful Necessity, which gives humans the courage to believe that they can’t avoid a destined danger nor face one that isn’t meant for them; to the Necessity that teaches us, roughly or gently, that there are no random events; that Law governs all existence, a Law that is not intelligent but is intelligence itself—neither personal nor impersonal—it disregards words and goes beyond understanding; it dissolves individuals; it brings nature to life; yet invites the pure in heart to tap into its infinite power.

II.

II.

POWER.

Power.

His tongue was framed to music,
And his hand was armed with skill,
His face was the mould of beauty,
And his heart the throne of will.
He spoke beautifully,
And he was talented with his hands,
His face was a picture of beauty,
And his heart was full of determination.

POWER.

Power.

There is not yet any inventory of a man's faculties, any more than a bible of his opinions. Who shall set a limit to the influence of a human being? There are men, who, by their sympathetic attractions, carry nations with them, and lead the activity of the human race. And if there be such a tie, that, wherever the mind of man goes, nature will accompany him, perhaps there are men whose magnetisms are of that force to draw material and elemental powers, and, where they appear, immense instrumentalities organize around them. Life is a search after power; and this is an element with which the world is so saturated,—there is no chink or crevice in which it is not lodged,—that no honest seeking goes unrewarded. A man should prize events and possessions as the ore in which this fine mineral is found; and he can well afford to let events and possessions, and the breath of the body go, if their value has been added to him in the shape of power. If he have secured the elixir, he can spare the wide gardens from which it was distilled. A cultivated man, wise to know and bold to perform, is the end to which nature works, and the education of the will is the flowering and result of all this geology and astronomy.

There isn't a complete inventory of a person's abilities, just like there isn't a guide to their beliefs. Who can determine the impact a person can have? Some individuals, with their charismatic qualities, can rally entire nations and drive human progress. And if there’s a connection that means wherever a human mind goes, nature follows, then there may be people whose magnetic charm is so strong it attracts physical and natural forces, causing vast resources to gather around them when they show up. Life is about seeking power; it's an element that permeates the world—there's no space or crack where it doesn't exist—so anyone who genuinely searches will find it. A person should value experiences and possessions like the ore that contains this precious mineral; they can easily let go of experiences and possessions, and even life itself, if those things have contributed to their power. If he has obtained the essence of empowerment, he can part with the expansive gardens from which it came. A well-educated person, wise enough to understand and brave enough to act, is the goal nature strives for, and the training of willpower is the culmination of all this study of geology and astronomy.

All successful men have agreed in one thing,—they were causationists. They believed that things went not by luck, but by law; that there was not a weak or a cracked link in the chain that joins the first and last of things. A belief in causality, or strict connection between every trifle and the principle of being, and, in consequence, belief in compensation, or, that nothing is got for nothing,—characterizes all valuable minds, and must control every effort that is made by an industrious one. The most valiant men are the best believers in the tension of the laws. "All the great captains," said Bonaparte, "have performed vast achievements by conforming with the rules of the art,—by adjusting efforts to obstacles."

All successful people agree on one thing—they were causationists. They believed that things didn't happen by chance, but by law; that there wasn't a weak link in the chain connecting the beginning and the end of everything. A belief in causality, or a strong connection between every little detail and the essence of existence, along with a belief in compensation—that nothing comes for free—characterizes all valuable minds and must guide every effort made by someone who works hard. The bravest individuals are the strongest believers in the power of laws. "All the great leaders," Bonaparte said, "have achieved remarkable things by adhering to the principles of the craft—by aligning efforts with challenges."

The key to the age may be this, or that, or the other, as the young orators describe;—the key to all ages is—Imbecility; imbecility in the vast majority of men, at all times, and, even in heroes, in all but certain eminent moments; victims of gravity, custom, and fear. This gives force to the strong,—that the multitude have no habit of self-reliance or original action.

The key to any era might be this, that, or the other, as the young speakers say;—the real key to all ages is—foolishness; foolishness in the vast majority of people, at all times, and, even in heroes, except for certain remarkable moments; they are all victims of convention, tradition, and fear. This empowers the strong—because the masses lack the habit of self-reliance or original action.

We must reckon success a constitutional trait. Courage,—the old physicians taught, (and their meaning holds, if their physiology is a little mythical,)—courage, or the degree of life, is as the degree of circulation of the blood in the arteries. "During passion, anger, fury, trials of strength, wrestling, fighting, a large amount of blood is collected in the arteries, the maintenance of bodily strength requiring it, and but little is sent into the veins. This condition is constant with intrepid persons." Where the arteries hold their blood, is courage and adventure possible. Where they pour it unrestrained into the veins, the spirit is low and feeble. For performance of great mark, it needs extraordinary health. If Eric is in robust health, and has slept well, and is at the top of his condition, and thirty years old, at his departure from Greenland, he will steer west, and his ships will reach Newfoundland. But take out Eric, and put in a stronger and bolder man,—Biorn, or Thorfin,—and the ships will, with just as much ease, sail six hundred, one thousand, fifteen hundred miles further, and reach Labrador and New England. There is no chance in results. With adults, as with children, one class enter cordially into the game, and whirl with the whirling world; the others have cold hands, and remain bystanders; or are only dragged in by the humor and vivacity of those who can carry a dead weight. The first wealth is health. Sickness is poor-spirited, and cannot serve any one: it must husband its resources to live. But health or fulness answers its own ends, and has to spare, runs over, and inundates the neighborhoods and creeks of other men's necessities.

We need to consider success a fundamental quality. Courage—old doctors taught this (and their ideas still apply, even if their science is a bit fanciful)—courage, or the level of life, is linked to how well blood circulates in the arteries. "During times of passion, anger, fury, tests of strength, wrestling, and fighting, a lot of blood gathers in the arteries, as the body needs it for strength, while only a little flows into the veins. This state is typical for fearless individuals." Where the arteries are filled with blood, courage and adventure are possible. Where the blood flows freely into the veins, the spirit is weak and low. To achieve something significant, extraordinary health is necessary. If Eric is in great health, has rested well, is at his peak condition, and is thirty years old when he leaves Greenland, he will head west, and his ships will reach Newfoundland. But if we replace Eric with a stronger, bolder man—Biorn or Thorfin—the ships will just as easily sail six hundred, one thousand, or even fifteen hundred miles further, reaching Labrador and New England. There's no randomness in the outcomes. Adults, like children, fall into two groups: some enthusiastically join the game and spin along with the world; others have cold hands and remain bystanders or are only dragged in by the energy and liveliness of those who can carry extra weight. The greatest wealth is health. Illness makes one weak and unable to help anyone else; it must conserve its resources to survive. But health or abundance fulfills its own needs, has plenty to spare, and flows into the lives and needs of others.

All power is of one kind, a sharing of the nature of the world. The mind that is parallel with the laws of nature will be in the current of events, and strong with their strength. One man is made of the same stuff of which events are made; is in sympathy with the course of things; can predict it. Whatever befalls, befalls him first; so that he is equal to whatever shall happen. A man who knows men, can talk well on politics, trade, law, war, religion. For, everywhere, men are led in the same manners.

All power is the same, a reflection of the world's nature. The mind that aligns with the laws of nature will flow with the events happening around it and be empowered by their strength. One person is made of the same essence that makes up events; they resonate with the way things unfold and can foresee it. Whatever happens, happens to them first, making them ready for whatever comes their way. A person who understands people can speak effectively about politics, business, law, war, and religion. Because, in every context, people are guided in similar ways.

The advantage of a strong pulse is not to be supplied by any labor, art, or concert. It is like the climate, which easily rears a crop, which no glass, or irrigation, or tillage, or manures, can elsewhere rival. It is like the opportunity of a city like New York, or Constantinople, which needs no diplomacy to force capital or genius or labor to it. They come of themselves, as the waters flow to it. So a broad, healthy, massive understanding seems to lie on the shore of unseen rivers, of unseen oceans, which are covered with barks, that, night and day, are drifted to this point. That is poured into its lap, which other men lie plotting for. It is in everybody's secret; anticipates everybody's discovery; and if it do not command every fact of the genius and the scholar, it is because it is large and sluggish, and does not think them worth the exertion which you do.

The benefit of a strong pulse can't be created by any amount of labor, artistry, or collaboration. It's like the climate that can naturally cultivate crops better than glasshouses, irrigation, tilling, or fertilizers can anywhere else. It’s similar to the opportunity offered by a city like New York or Constantinople, which doesn't need any kind of diplomacy to attract investment, talent, or labor. They come on their own, just like water flows toward it. A broad, healthy, robust understanding seems to lie at the edge of unseen rivers and oceans, which are filled with boats that are constantly drifting to this point. What is received here is what others are trying to scheme for. It’s a common secret; it anticipates everyone’s discoveries; and if it doesn’t grasp every detail from geniuses and scholars, it’s because it’s vast and slow-moving, not considering them worth the effort you do.

This affirmative force is in one, and is not in another, as one horse has the spring in him, and another in the whip. "On the neck of the young man," said Hafiz, "sparkles no gem so gracious as enterprise." Import into any stationary district, as into an old Dutch population in New York or Pennsylvania, or among the planters of Virginia, a colony of hardy Yankees, with seething brains, heads full of steam-hammer, pulley, crank, and toothed wheel,—and everything begins to shine with values. What enhancement to all the water and land in England, is the arrival of James Watt or Brunel! In every company, there is not only the active and passive sex, but, in both men and women, a deeper and more important sex of mind, namely, the inventive or creative class of both men and women, and the uninventive or accepting class. Each plus man represents his set, and, if he have the accidental advantage of personal ascendency,—which implies neither more nor less of talent, but merely the temperamental or taming eye of a soldier or a schoolmaster, (which one has, and one has not, as one has a black moustache and one a blond,) then quite easily and without envy or resistance, all his coadjutors and feeders will admit his right to absorb them. The merchant works by book-keeper and cashier; the lawyer's authorities are hunted up by clerks; the geologist reports the surveys of his subalterns; Commander Wilkes appropriates the results of all the naturalists attached to the Expedition; Thorwaldsen's statue is finished by stone-cutters; Dumas has journeymen; and Shakspeare was theatre-manager, and used the labor of many young men, as well as the playbooks.

This positive energy exists in one person but not in another, just like one horse has natural strength while another relies on the whip. "On the neck of a young man," said Hafiz, "there’s no gem as precious as ambition." When you bring a group of determined Yankees into a stagnant area, like an old Dutch community in New York or Pennsylvania, or among the planters of Virginia, everything starts to shine with new value. Just think of the impact on all the water and land in England brought by the arrival of James Watt or Brunel! In every group, there’s not just the active and passive genders, but in both men and women, there's a more significant category—namely, the inventive or creative class alongside the uninventive or accepting class. Each 'plus' individual represents their group, and if they have the lucky advantage of personal influence—which doesn’t necessarily mean more talent, but rather the natural confidence of a leader or teacher (which some have, and some don’t, just like having a black mustache versus a blonde one)—then, without jealousy or resistance, everyone around them will accept their leadership. The merchant relies on an accountant and cashier; lawyers depend on clerks to gather information; geologists report based on their subordinates' surveys; Commander Wilkes utilizes the findings of all the naturalists on his expedition; Thorwaldsen’s statue is completed by stone-cutters; Dumas has his assistants; and Shakespeare was a theater manager who made use of many young men’s labor, as well as the play scripts.

There is always room for a man of force, and he makes room for many. Society is a troop of thinkers, and the best heads among them take the best places. A feeble man can see the farms that are fenced and tilled, the houses that are built. The strong man sees the possible houses and farms. His eye makes estates, as fast as the sun breeds clouds.

There’s always space for a strong individual, and they create space for others. Society is a group of thinkers, and the smartest among them earn the top positions. A weak person can notice the farms that are enclosed and cultivated, the houses that are constructed. The strong person envisions the potential houses and farms. Their vision creates opportunities as quickly as the sun generates clouds.

When a new boy comes into school, when a man travels, and encounters strangers every day, or, when into any old club a new comer is domesticated, that happens which befalls, when a strange ox is driven into a pen or pasture where cattle are kept; there is at once a trial of strength between the best pair of horns and the new comer, and it is settled thenceforth which is the leader. So now, there is a measuring of strength, very courteous, but decisive, and an acquiescence thenceforward when these two meet. Each reads his fate in the other's eyes. The weaker party finds, that none of his information or wit quite fits the occasion. He thought he knew this or that: he finds that he omitted to learn the end of it. Nothing that he knows will quite hit the mark, whilst all the rival's arrows are good, and well thrown. But if he knew all the facts in the encyclopædia, it would not help him: for this is an affair of presence of mind, of attitude, of aplomb: the opponent has the sun and wind, and, in every cast, the choice of weapon and mark; and, when he himself is matched with some other antagonist, his own shafts fly well and hit. 'Tis a question of stomach and constitution. The second man is as good as the first,—perhaps better; but has not stoutness or stomach, as the first has, and so his wit seems over-fine or under-fine.

When a new kid starts at school, when a man travels and meets strangers daily, or when a newcomer joins an old club, it’s like when a strange ox is brought into a pen or pasture where other cattle are kept. Right away, there's a contest of strength between the strongest pair of horns and the newcomer, determining who the leader is from that point on. So now, there's a respectful but decisive test of strength, and an acceptance of roles moving forward whenever these two meet. Each one sees his fate reflected in the other's eyes. The weaker party realizes that none of his knowledge or wit quite fits the situation. He thought he understood things: he finds out he missed learning the ending. Nothing he knows quite hits the mark, while all of his rival's arrows are sharp and well-aimed. But even if he knew every fact in the encyclopedia, it wouldn't help him because this is an issue of quick thinking, demeanor, and confidence. The opponent has the advantage of the sun and wind, and decides on the weapon and target with every throw; and when he faces another competitor, his own shots are accurate and effective. It’s a matter of guts and resilience. The second person may be just as capable as the first—maybe even better—but lacks the boldness or spirit that the first has, which makes his wit seem either too sharp or too dull.

Health is good,—power, life, that resists disease, poison, and all enemies, and is conservative, as well as creative. Here is question, every spring, whether to graft with wax, or whether with clay; whether to whitewash or to potash, or to prune; but the one point is the thrifty tree. A good tree, that agrees with the soil, will grow in spite of blight, or bug, or pruning, or neglect, by night and by day, in all weathers and all treatments. Vivacity, leadership, must be had, and we are not allowed to be nice in choosing. We must fetch the pump with dirty water, if clean cannot be had. If we will make bread, we must have contagion, yeast, emptyings, or what not, to induce fermentation into the dough: as the torpid artist seeks inspiration at any cost, by virtue or by vice, by friend or by fiend, by prayer or by wine. And we have a certain instinct, that where is great amount of life, though gross and peccant, it has its own checks and purifications, and will be found at last in harmony with moral laws.

Health is important—it's the strength, the energy that fights off disease, poison, and all kinds of threats. It’s both protective and creative. Every spring, there’s the dilemma of whether to graft with wax or clay, whether to whitewash or use potash, or whether to prune. But the key is a healthy tree. A strong tree that matches well with its soil will thrive despite blight, bugs, pruning, or neglect, day and night, in any weather and under any conditions. We need enthusiasm and leadership, and we can’t afford to be too picky about it. Sometimes, we have to draw water from a dirty well if we can't find clean. To make bread, we need yeast and other ingredients to kickstart fermentation in the dough, just like an artist in need of inspiration will seek it out at any cost—whether through virtue or vice, friends or enemies, prayer or wine. We have an instinct that where there is a lot of life, even if it’s messy or flawed, it will eventually find its own balance and align with moral truths.

We watch in children with pathetic interest, the degree in which they possess recuperative force. When they are hurt by us, or by each other, or go to the bottom of the class, or miss the annual prizes, or are beaten in the game,—if they lose heart, and remember the mischance in their chamber at home, they have a serious check. But if they have the buoyancy and resistance that preoccupies them with new interest in the new moment,—the wounds cicatrize, and the fibre is the tougher for the hurt.

We observe with a mix of sympathy and curiosity how resilient children can be. When they're hurt by us, by one another, fall behind in class, miss out on awards, or lose a game—if they get discouraged and dwell on their disappointment at home, it sets them back significantly. But if they bounce back and focus on new experiences in the moment, they heal, and the experience makes them stronger.

One comes to value this plus health, when he sees that all difficulties vanish before it. A timid man listening to the alarmists in Congress, and in the newspapers, and observing the profligacy of party,—sectional interests urged with a fury which shuts its eyes to consequences, with a mind made up to desperate extremities, ballot in one hand, and rifle in the other,—might easily believe that he and his country have seen their best days, and he hardens himself the best he can against the coming ruin. But, after this has been foretold with equal confidence fifty times, and government six per cents have not declined a quarter of a mill, he discovers that the enormous elements of strength which are here in play, make our politics unimportant. Personal power, freedom, and the resources of nature strain every faculty of every citizen. We prosper with such vigor, that, like thrifty trees, which grow in spite of ice, lice, mice, and borers, so we do not suffer from the profligate swarms that fatten on the national treasury. The huge animals nourish huge parasites, and the rancor of the disease attests the strength of the constitution. The same energy in the Greek Demos drew the remark, that the evils of popular government appear greater than they are; there is compensation for them in the spirit and energy it awakens. The rough and ready style which belongs to a people of sailors, foresters, farmers, and mechanics, has its advantages. Power educates the potentate. As long as our people quote English standards they dwarf their own proportions. A Western lawyer of eminence said to me he wished it were a penal offence to bring an English law-book into a court in this country, so pernicious had he found in his experience our deference to English precedent. The very word 'commerce' has only an English meaning, and is pinched to the cramp exigencies of English experience. The commerce of rivers, the commerce of railroads, and who knows but the commerce of air-balloons, must add an American extension to the pond-hole of admiralty. As long as our people quote English standards, they will miss the sovereignty of power; but let these rough riders,—legislators in shirt-sleeves,—Hoosier, Sucker, Wolverine, Badger,—or whatever hard head Arkansas, Oregon, or Utah sends, half orator, half assassin, to represent its wrath and cupidity at Washington,—let these drive as they may; and the disposition of territories and public lands, the necessity of balancing and keeping at bay the snarling majorities of German, Irish, and of native millions, will bestow promptness, address, and reason, at last, on our buffalo-hunter, and authority and majesty of manners. The instinct of the people is right. Men expect from good whigs, put into office by the respectability of the country, much less skill to deal with Mexico, Spain, Britain, or with our own malcontent members, than from some strong transgressor, like Jefferson, or Jackson, who first conquers his own government, and then uses the same genius to conquer the foreigner. The senators who dissented from Mr. Polk's Mexican war, were not those who knew better, but those who, from political position, could afford it; not Webster, but Benton and Calhoun.

One starts to appreciate this plus health when they notice how all challenges disappear in its presence. A cautious person listening to the alarmists in Congress and in the newspapers, and seeing the reckless behavior of party members—sectional interests pushed with a fervor that ignores the consequences, with a mindset prepared for desperate measures, ballot in one hand, and rifle in the other—might easily believe that he and his country have seen their best days and tries to brace himself as best he can against the impending doom. However, after this has been predicted with equal certainty fifty times, and government bonds haven’t dropped even a quarter of a mill, he realizes that the immense forces at play here make our politics trivial. Personal power, freedom, and the resources of nature stretch every citizen's capabilities. We thrive with such intensity that, like resilient trees that grow despite ice, pests, and borers, we don’t suffer from the extravagant swarms that feast on the national treasury. The large creatures sustain significant parasites, and the severity of the affliction confirms the strength of the constitution. The same vigor in the Greek Demos led to the observation that the issues of popular governance seem worse than they truly are; there is compensation for them in the spirit and energy it generates. The rough and ready style that belongs to a people of sailors, foresters, farmers, and mechanics, has its benefits. Power educates the ruler. As long as our people reference English standards, they diminish their own potential. A prominent Western lawyer told me that he wished it were a crime to bring an English law book into a courtroom in this country, as he found our respect for English precedent to be so damaging in his experience. The very word 'commerce' only carries an English meaning and is restricted to the limited needs of English experiences. The commerce of rivers, the commerce of railroads, and who knows, maybe the commerce of air-balloons, must add an American dimension to the narrow confines of admiralty law. As long as our people cite English standards, they will overlook the power of sovereignty; but let these rugged representatives—lawmakers in shirt sleeves—Hoosier, Sucker, Wolverine, Badger, or whatever determined individual Arkansas, Oregon, or Utah sends, half orator, half enforcer, to voice its anger and greed in Washington—let them drive as they may; and the management of territories and public lands, the need to balance and keep the irritable majorities of German, Irish, and native millions in check, will eventually grant swiftness, skill, and reasoning to our buffalo-hunter, along with authority and dignity. The people’s instinct is correct. Men expect much less skill in dealing with Mexico, Spain, Britain, or with our own dissatisfied members from reputable whigs elected by the country than from some bold transgressor, like Jefferson or Jackson, who first overcomes his own government and then applies that same talent to conquer foreigners. The senators who opposed Mr. Polk's Mexican war were not those who knew better, but those who, from their political status, could afford it; not Webster, but Benton and Calhoun.

This power, to be sure, is not clothed in satin. 'Tis the power of Lynch law, of soldiers and pirates; and it bullies the peaceable and loyal. But it brings its own antidote; and here is my point,—that all kinds of power usually emerge at the same time; good energy, and bad; power of mind, with physical health; the ecstasies of devotion, with the exasperations of debauchery. The same elements are always present, only sometimes these conspicuous, and sometimes those; what was yesterday foreground, being to-day background,—what was surface, playing now a not less effective part as basis. The longer the drought lasts, the more is the atmosphere surcharged with water. The faster the ball falls to the sun, the force to fly off is by so much augmented. And, in morals, wild liberty breeds iron conscience; natures with great impulses have great resources, and return from far. In politics, the sons of democrats will be whigs; whilst red republicanism, in the father, is a spasm of nature to engender an intolerable tyrant in the next age. On the other hand, conservatism, ever more timorous and narrow, disgusts the children, and drives them for a mouthful of fresh air into radicalism.

This power, of course, isn't wrapped in luxury. It's the power of mob justice, of soldiers and pirates; and it intimidates the peaceful and loyal. But it brings its own remedy; and here's my point— different kinds of power usually surface at the same time; good energy and bad; mental strength along with physical health; the joys of devotion alongside the frustrations of excess. The same elements are always around, sometimes one set is more visible, and other times the other set takes the spotlight; what was in the foreground yesterday is in the background today—what was on the surface now plays a significant role as the foundation. The longer the drought continues, the more the atmosphere is saturated with moisture. The faster the ball falls to the sun, the more force there is to push it away. In morality, unchecked freedom creates a strict conscience; those with strong instincts have great resources and can recover from far-off places. In politics, the children of democrats will become whigs; while extreme republicanism in one generation can lead to an unbearable tyrant in the next. On the other hand, conservatism, which grows more cautious and narrow-minded, repulses the next generation and pushes them toward radicalism for a breath of fresh air.

Those who have most of this coarse energy,—the 'bruisers,' who have run the gauntlet of caucus and tavern through the county or the state, have their own vices, but they have the good nature of strength and courage. Fierce and unscrupulous, they are usually frank and direct, and above falsehood. Our politics fall into bad hands, and churchmen and men of refinement, it seems agreed, are not fit persons to send to Congress. Politics is a deleterious profession, like some poisonous handicrafts. Men in power have no opinions, but may be had cheap for any opinion, for any purpose,—and if it be only a question between the most civil and the most forcible, I lean to the last. These Hoosiers and Suckers are really better than the snivelling opposition. Their wrath is at least of a bold and manly cast. They see, against the unanimous declarations of the people, how much crime the people will bear; they proceed from step to step, and they have calculated but too justly upon their Excellencies, the New England governors, and upon their Honors, the New England legislators. The messages of the governors and the resolutions of the legislatures, are a proverb for expressing a sham virtuous indignation, which, in the course of events, is sure to be belied.

Those who possess most of this rough energy—the 'tough guys' who have navigated the political scene in the county or the state—have their own flaws, but they also have the quality of strength and bravery. Fierce and ruthless, they are typically straightforward and honest, avoiding deception. Our politics end up in the hands of the wrong people, and it seems agreed that church leaders and refined individuals aren't suitable candidates for Congress. Politics is a harmful profession, akin to some dangerous trades. Those in power don't hold strong opinions, but they can easily be swayed for any agenda—whether it's a choice between being polite or being forceful, I tend to favor the latter. These Hoosiers and Suckers are actually better than the whiny opposition. Their anger at least has a bold and masculine quality. They recognize how much wrongdoing the public is willing to tolerate, moving from one step to another, and they've accurately figured out their esteemed New England governors and their honorable New England legislators. The governors' messages and the legislators' resolutions serve as a cliché for feigning virtuous outrage, which, as events unfold, is bound to be proven false.

In trade, also, this energy usually carries a trace of ferocity. Philanthropic and religious bodies do not commonly make their executive officers out of saints. The communities hitherto founded by Socialists,—the Jesuits, the Port-Royalists, the American communities at New Harmony, at Brook Farm, at Zoar, are only possible, by installing Judas as steward. The rest of the offices may be filled by good burgesses. The pious and charitable proprietor has a foreman not quite so pious and charitable. The most amiable of country gentlemen has a certain pleasure in the teeth of the bull-dog which guards his orchard. Of the Shaker society, it was formerly a sort of proverb in the country, that they always sent the devil to market. And in representations of the Deity, painting, poetry, and popular religion have ever drawn the wrath from Hell. It is an esoteric doctrine of society, that a little wickedness is good to make muscle; as if conscience were not good for hands and legs, as if poor decayed formalists of law and order cannot run like wild goats, wolves, and conies; that, as there is a use in medicine for poisons, so the world cannot move without rogues; that public spirit and the ready hand are as well found among the malignants. 'Tis not very rare, the coincidence of sharp private and political practice, with public spirit, and good neighborhood.

In trade, this drive often has a hint of aggression. Philanthropic and religious organizations rarely choose their leaders from among saints. The communities previously established by Socialists—like the Jesuits, the Port-Royalists, and the American communities at New Harmony, Brook Farm, and Zoar—can only function by bringing in someone morally questionable as their manager. The rest of the positions can be filled by decent citizens. The well-meaning and generous owner often has a foreman who isn’t quite so well-meaning and generous. The most charming country gentleman takes a certain pleasure in the fierce dog that protects his orchard. It used to be a saying about the Shaker society that they always sent the devil to market. In representations of the divine, art, poetry, and popular religion have always stirred up the anger of Hell. There’s a hidden belief in society that a bit of wickedness is necessary for strength; as if a good conscience doesn’t benefit our physical abilities, and as if the worn-out formalists of law and order can’t run like wild goats, wolves, and rabbits; that just as poisons have their place in medicine, so the world can’t function without some dishonest people; that public spirit and readiness to act can also be found among the corrupt. It’s not uncommon to see a blend of shrewd personal and political behavior alongside public spirit and good neighborliness.

I knew a burly Boniface who for many years kept a public-house in one of our rural capitals. He was a knave whom the town could ill spare. He was a social, vascular creature, grasping and selfish. There was no crime which he did not or could not commit. But he made good friends of the selectmen, served them with his best chop, when they supped at his house, and also with his honor the Judge, he was very cordial, grasping his hand. He introduced all the fiends, male and female, into the town, and united in his person the functions of bully, incendiary, swindler, barkeeper, and burglar. He girdled the trees, and cut off the horses' tails of the temperance people, in the night. He led the rummies' and radicals in town-meeting with a speech. Meantime, he was civil, fat, and easy, in his house, and precisely the most public-spirited citizen. He was active in getting the roads repaired and planted with shade-trees; he subscribed for the fountains, the gas, and the telegraph; he introduced the new horse-rake, the new scraper, the baby-jumper, and what not, that Connecticut sends to the admiring citizens. He did this the easier, that the peddler stopped at his house, and paid his keeping, by setting up his new trap on the landlord's premises.

I knew a hefty guy named Boniface who ran a bar in one of our small towns for many years. He was a shady character that the town could hardly do without. He was social and lively, but also greedy and selfish. There wasn’t a crime he wouldn’t commit or get away with. However, he made good connections with the town selectmen, serving them his finest dishes when they dined at his place, and he was very friendly with the Judge, shaking his hand warmly. He brought all sorts of troublemakers, both men and women, into the town and combined the roles of bully, arsonist, swindler, bartender, and thief. He would sneak out at night to damage the trees and mutilate the horses of the temperance advocates. He led the drunks and radicals during town meetings with his speeches. Meanwhile, he was polite, overweight, and relaxed in his bar, and everyone thought he was the most community-minded citizen. He was active in getting the roads fixed and planted with shade trees; he contributed to the fountains, the gas, and the telegraph systems; he introduced the latest farming equipment and gadgets that Connecticut sold to the impressed residents. He found this easy since the peddler would stop by his bar and pay for his stay by showcasing his new products on the landlord's property.

Whilst thus the energy for originating and executing work, deforms itself by excess, and so our axe chops off our own fingers,—this evil is not without remedy. All the elements whose aid man calls in, will sometimes become his masters, especially those of most subtle force. Shall he, then, renounce steam, fire, and electricity, or, shall he learn to deal with them? The rule for this whole class of agencies is,—all plus is good; only put it in the right place.

While the energy used for starting and completing tasks can get out of hand and cause us harm, this problem isn’t without a solution. All the elements we rely on can sometimes take control, especially those that are most powerful. Should we give up on steam, fire, and electricity, or should we learn how to manage them? The key for this entire group of forces is—everything plus is beneficial; just make sure to use it appropriately.

Men of this surcharge of arterial blood cannot live on nuts, herb-tea, and elegies; cannot read novels, and play whist; cannot satisfy all their wants at the Thursday Lecture, or the Boston Athenæum. They pine for adventure, and must go to Pike's Peak; had rather die by the hatchet of a Pawnee, than sit all day and every day at a counting-room desk. They are made for war, for the sea, for mining, hunting, and clearing; for hair-breadth adventures, huge risks, and the joy of eventful living. Some men cannot endure an hour of calm at sea. I remember a poor Malay cook, on board a Liverpool packet, who, when the wind blew a gale, could not contain his joy; "Blow!" he cried, "me do tell you, blow!" Their friends and governors must see that some vent for their explosive complexion is provided. The roisters who are destined for infamy at home, if sent to Mexico, will "cover you with glory," and come back heroes and generals. There are Oregons, Californias, and Exploring Expeditions enough appertaining to America, to find them in files to gnaw, and in crocodiles to eat. The young English are fine animals, full of blood, and when they have no wars to breathe their riotous valors in, they seek for travels as dangerous as war, diving into Maelstroms; swimming Hellesponts; wading up the snowy Himmaleh; hunting lion, rhinoceros, elephant, in South Africa; gypsying with Borrow in Spain and Algiers; riding alligators in South America with Waterton; utilizing Bedouin, Sheik, and Pacha, with Layard; yachting among the icebergs of Lancaster Sound; peeping into craters on the equator; or running on the creases of Malays in Borneo.

Men filled with this intensity of life can't survive on just nuts, herbal tea, and poetry; they can't read novels or play whist; they can't fulfill all their needs at the Thursday Lecture or the Boston Athenæum. They crave adventure and need to go to Pike's Peak; they'd rather face the hatchet of a Pawnee than sit at a counting-room desk every day. They're made for war, the sea, mining, hunting, and clearing land; for dangerous adventures, huge risks, and the excitement of living fully. Some men can't stand an hour of calm at sea. I remember a poor Malay cook on a Liverpool packet who, when there was a strong wind, couldn't hide his excitement; "Blow!" he shouted, "I tell you, blow!" Their friends and leaders need to ensure there’s an outlet for their explosive nature. Those who are bound for disgrace at home, if sent to Mexico, will "bring you glory" and return as heroes and generals. There are plenty of Oregons, Californias, and Exploring Expeditions in America to keep them busy with both thrills and challenges. Young Englishmen are energetic and full of life, and when there are no wars to unleash their wild bravery, they seek out travels as perilous as war, diving into whirlpools; swimming across the Hellespont; trekking up the snowy Himalayas; hunting lions, rhinos, and elephants in South Africa; wandering with Borrow in Spain and Algiers; riding alligators in South America with Waterton; engaging with Bedouins, sheikhs, and pashas with Layard; yachting among the icebergs of Lancaster Sound; exploring craters at the equator; or chasing Malays in Borneo.

The excess of virility has the same importance in general history, as in private and industrial life. Strong race or strong individual rests at last on natural forces, which are best in the savage, who, like the beasts around him, is still in reception of the milk from the teats of Nature. Cut off the connection between any of our works, and this aboriginal source, and the work is shallow. The people lean on this, and the mob is not quite so bad an argument as we sometimes say, for it has this good side. "March without the people," said a French deputy from the tribune, "and you march into night: their instincts are a finger-pointing of Providence, always turned toward real benefit. But when you espouse an Orleans party, or a Bourbon, or a Montalembert party, or any other but an organic party, though you mean well, you have a personality instead of a principle, which will inevitably drag you into a corner."

The excess of masculinity is just as important in general history as it is in personal and business life. A strong race or strong individual ultimately relies on natural forces, which are most potent in the savage, who, like the animals around him, is still drawing from the nurturing essence of Nature. Disconnect any of our efforts from this primal source, and the work becomes superficial. The people rely on this connection, and the crowd isn't as bad of an argument as we sometimes claim, because it has this positive aspect. "March without the people," said a French deputy from the podium, "and you march into darkness: their instincts are a guiding hand of Providence, always pointing toward genuine benefit. But when you align with an Orleans party, a Bourbon, a Montalembert party, or any group that isn't organic, even if your intentions are good, you end up with a personality instead of a principle, which will inevitably lead you into a corner."

The best anecdotes of this force are to be had from savage life, in explorers, soldiers, and buccaneers. But who cares for fallings-out of assassins, and fights of bears, or grindings of icebergs? Physical force has no value, where there is nothing else. Snow in snow-banks, fire in volcanoes and solfataras is cheap. The luxury of ice is in tropical countries, and midsummer days. The luxury of fire is, to have a little on our hearth: and of electricity, not volleys of the charged cloud, but the manageable stream on the battery-wires. So of spirit, or energy; the rests or remains of it in the civil and moral man, are worth all the cannibals in the Pacific.

The best stories about this force come from the lives of explorers, soldiers, and pirates. But who cares about the disputes among assassins, bear fights, or icebergs grinding against each other? Physical force means nothing if there’s nothing else to accompany it. Snow piled up in snowbanks, fire in volcanoes and hot springs is easily found. The real luxury of ice is in tropical regions, especially during the summer. The true luxury of fire is having a little on our hearth, and with electricity, it isn’t the massive bursts from thunderstorms but the steady flow along the wires from the battery. Similarly, when it comes to spirit or energy, the remnants of it in a civilized and moral person are worth far more than all the cannibals in the Pacific.

In history, the great moment is, when the savage is just ceasing to be a savage, with all his hairy Pelasgic strength directed on his opening sense of beauty:—and you have Pericles and Phidias,—not yet passed over into the Corinthian civility. Everything good in nature and the world is in that moment of transition, when the swarthy juices still flow plentifully from nature, but their astringency or acridity is got out by ethics and humanity.

In history, the significant moment is when the savage is just starting to stop being a savage, with all his raw Pelasgic strength focused on his emerging sense of beauty:—and you have Pericles and Phidias—not yet fully transitioned into the refined civility of Corinth. Everything good in nature and the world exists in that moment of change, when the darker essences still flow abundantly from nature, but their harshness or bitterness is tempered by ethics and humanity.

The triumphs of peace have been in some proximity to war. Whilst the hand was still familiar with the sword-hilt, whilst the habits of the camp were still visible in the port and complexion of the gentleman, his intellectual power culminated: the compression and tension of these stern conditions is a training for the finest and softest arts, and can rarely be compensated in tranquil times, except by some analogous vigor drawn from occupations as hardy as war.

The victories of peace have often been close to war. While the hand was still used to the sword, and the ways of the camp were still evident in the demeanor and appearance of the gentleman, his mental strength reached its peak: the pressure and strain of these harsh conditions serve as training for the most refined and delicate skills, which is rarely matched in peaceful times, unless matched by some similar intensity taken from pursuits as tough as war.

We say that success is constitutional; depends on a plus condition of mind and body, on power of work, on courage: that it is of main efficacy in carrying on the world, and, though rarely found in the right state for an article of commerce, but oftener in the supersaturate or excess, which makes it dangerous and destructive, yet it cannot be spared, and must be had in that form, and absorbents provided to take off its edge.

We say that success is built into our nature; it relies on a plus combination of mental and physical state, on the ability to work hard, and on bravery: that it plays a crucial role in moving the world forward, and while it’s rarely in the right condition for trade, it often exists in an overabundance that makes it risky and harmful. Still, it’s indispensable and must be embraced in that form, with measures in place to soften its impact.

The affirmative class monopolize the homage of mankind. They originate and execute all the great feats. What a force was coiled up in the skull of Napoleon! Of the sixty thousand men making his army at Eylau, it seems some thirty thousand were thieves and burglars. The men whom, in peaceful communities, we hold if we can, with iron at their legs, in prisons, under the muskets of sentinels, this man dealt with, hand to hand, dragged them to their duty, and won his victories by their bayonets.

The ruling class captures the respect of humanity. They initiate and carry out all the great achievements. What power was contained in Napoleon's mind! Of the sixty thousand men in his army at Eylau, about thirty thousand were thieves and burglars. The men whom, in peaceful societies, we often try to keep locked up with shackles, guarded by soldiers, this man engaged directly, compelled them to fulfill their responsibilities, and secured his victories through their weapons.

This aboriginal might gives a surprising pleasure when it appears under conditions of supreme refinement, as in the proficients in high art. When Michel Angelo was forced to paint the Sistine Chapel in fresco, of which art he knew nothing, he went down into the Pope's gardens behind the Vatican, and with a shovel dug out ochres, red and yellow, mixed them with glue and water with his own hands, and having, after many trials, at last suited himself, climbed his ladders, and painted away, week after week, month after month, the sibyls and prophets. He surpassed his successors in rough vigor, as much as in purity of intellect and refinement. He was not crushed by his one picture left unfinished at last. Michel was wont to draw his figures first in skeleton, then to clothe them with flesh, and lastly to drape them. "Ah!" said a brave painter to me, thinking on these things, "if a man has failed, you will find he has dreamed instead of working. There is no way to success in our art, but to take off your coat, grind paint, and work like a digger on the railroad, all day and every day."

This raw talent can bring surprising joy when it’s showcased at the highest level of refinement, like in skilled high art. When Michelangelo was tasked with painting the Sistine Chapel in fresco, a technique he didn’t know, he went into the Pope's gardens behind the Vatican and, using a shovel, dug out ochres—red and yellow. He mixed them with glue and water by hand, and after many attempts, he finally got it right. He then climbed his ladders and painted week after week, month after month, the sibyls and prophets. He surpassed his successors with his rough vigor, as well as his intellectual purity and refinement. He wasn’t defeated by that one unfinished painting. Michelangelo would first draw his figures as skeletons, then flesh them out, and finally drape them. “Ah!” a bold painter told me while reflecting on this, “if someone has failed, you'll find they dreamed instead of doing the work. There’s no shortcut to success in our art; you have to roll up your sleeves, grind paint, and work like a laborer on the railroad, all day and every day.”

Success goes thus invariably with a certain plus or positive power: an ounce of power must balance an ounce of weight. And, though a man cannot return into his mother's womb, and be born with new amounts of vivacity, yet there are two economies, which are the best succedanea which the case admits. The first is, the stopping off decisively our miscellaneous activity, and concentrating our force on one or a few points; as the gardener, by severe pruning, forces the sap of the tree into one or two vigorous limbs, instead of suffering it to spindle into a sheaf of twigs.

Success inevitably comes with a certain amount of positive energy: an ounce of power needs to balance an ounce of weight. And, while a person can’t go back into their mother’s womb and be born with new levels of vitality, there are two strategies that serve as the best alternatives in this situation. The first is to decisively cut off our scattered activities and focus our energy on one or a few key areas; just like a gardener, by pruning aggressively, directs the energy of the tree into one or two strong branches instead of letting it spread out into a bunch of tiny twigs.

"Enlarge not thy destiny," said the oracle: "endeavor not to do more than is given thee in charge." The one prudence in life is concentration; the one evil is dissipation: and it makes no difference whether our dissipations are coarse or fine; property and its cares, friends, and a social habit, or politics, or music, or feasting. Everything is good which takes away one plaything and delusion more, and drives us home to add one stroke of faithful work. Friends, books, pictures, lower duties, talents, flatteries, hopes,—all are distractions which cause oscillations in our giddy balloon, and make a good poise and a straight course impossible. You must elect your work; you shall take what your brain can, and drop all the rest. Only so, can that amount of vital force accumulate, which can make the step from knowing to doing. No matter how much faculty of idle seeing a man has, the step from knowing to doing is rarely taken. 'Tis a stop out of a chalk circle of imbecility into fruitfulness. Many an artist lacking this, lacks all: he sees the masculine Angelo or Cellini with despair. He, too, is up to Nature and the First Cause in his thought. But the spasm to collect and swing his whole being into one act, he has not. The poet Campbell said, that "a man accustomed to work was equal to any achievement he resolved on, and, that, for himself, necessity not inspiration was the prompter of his muse."

"Don’t make your goals bigger than they should be," said the oracle. "Don’t try to take on more than what’s assigned to you." The only wise approach in life is to focus; the only downside is getting scattered. It doesn’t matter if our distractions are simple or sophisticated—whether it’s possessions and their burdens, friendships, socializing, politics, music, or parties. Anything that removes one more distraction and illusion and brings us back to do one more honest task is beneficial. Friends, books, art, lesser responsibilities, skills, compliments, hopes—all are distractions that cause us to wobble in our flight and make it hard to maintain balance and a steady direction. You have to choose your work; take on what your mind can handle, and let go of everything else. Only then can the energy needed to move from knowing to doing build up. No matter how talented someone is at just observing, the leap from knowing to doing is rarely made. It’s a shift from a circle of foolishness into productivity. Many artists who lack this ability miss out on everything: they see the great masters like Michelangelo or Cellini and feel despair. They, too, understand Nature and the First Cause in their thoughts. But they don’t have the drive to gather and channel all their energy into one action. The poet Campbell said that "a man used to working can achieve anything he sets his mind to, and, for him, necessity—not inspiration—motivates his muse."

Concentration is the secret of strength in politics, in war, in trade, in short, in all management of human affairs. One of the high anecdotes of the world is the reply of Newton to the inquiry, "how he had been able to achieve his discoveries?"—"By always intending my mind." Or if you will have a text from politics, take this from Plutarch: "There was, in the whole city, but one street in which Pericles was ever seen, the street which led to the market-place and the council house. He declined all invitations to banquets, and all gay assemblies and company. During the whole period of his administration, he never dined at the table of a friend." Or if we seek an example from trade,—"I hope," said a good man to Rothschild, "your children are not too fond of money and business: I am sure you would not wish that."—"I am sure I should wish that: I wish them to give mind, soul, heart, and body to business,—that is the way to be happy. It requires a great deal of boldness and a great deal of caution, to make a great fortune, and when you have got it, it requires ten times as much wit to keep it. If I were to listen to all the projects proposed to me, I should ruin myself very soon. Stick to one business, young man. Stick to your brewery, (he said this to young Buxton,) and you will be the great brewer of London. Be brewer, and banker, and merchant, and manufacturer, and you will soon be in the Gazette."

Concentration is the key to strength in politics, war, trade, and basically in all areas of managing human affairs. One of the notable stories from history is how Newton responded when asked, "How did you achieve your discoveries?"—"By always focusing my mind." If you're looking for a political example, consider this quote from Plutarch: "In the entire city, there was only one street where Pericles was ever seen, the street that led to the marketplace and the council house. He turned down every invitation to parties and social events. Throughout his entire time in power, he never dined at a friend's table." Or for an example from trade—"I hope," said a good man to Rothschild, "that your children aren't too obsessed with money and business: I'm sure you wouldn't want that."—"Actually, I do want that: I want them to commit their minds, souls, hearts, and bodies to business—that's how to be happy. It takes a lot of boldness and a lot of caution to build a great fortune, and once you have it, it takes ten times more skill to keep it. If I listened to all the proposals I get, I'd be broke pretty quickly. Focus on one business, young man. Stick to your brewery," (he said this to young Buxton), "and you'll become the top brewer in London. Be a brewer, banker, merchant, and manufacturer, and you'll soon find yourself in the newspaper."

Many men are knowing, many are apprehensive and tenacious, but they do not rush to a decision. But in our flowing affairs a decision must be made,—the best, if you can; but any is better than none. There are twenty ways of going to a point, and one is the shortest; but set out at once on one. A man who has that presence of mind which can bring to him on the instant all he knows, is worth for action a dozen men who know as much, but can only bring it to light slowly. The good Speaker in the House is not the man who knows the theory of parliamentary tactics, but the man who decides off-hand. The good judge is not he who does hair-splitting justice to every allegation, but who, aiming at substantial justice, rules something intelligible for the guidance of suitors. The good lawyer is not the man who has an eye to every side and angle of contingency, and qualifies all his qualifications, but who throws himself on your part so heartily, that he can get you out of a scrape. Dr. Johnson said, in one of his flowing sentences, "Miserable beyond all names of wretchedness is that unhappy pair, who are doomed to reduce beforehand to the principles of abstract reason all the details of each domestic day. There are cases where little can be said, and much must be done."

Many men are knowledgeable, many are cautious and determined, but they don’t rush into a decision. However, in our ongoing situations, a decision needs to be made—the best one, if you can manage it; but any decision is better than none. There are numerous ways to reach a destination, and one is the quickest; but choose one and start immediately. A person who has the mental presence to immediately access all they know is worth more for action than a dozen people who know the same amount but can only slowly gather their thoughts. The effective Speaker in the House isn’t the one who knows all the theory of parliamentary tactics, but the one who can make a decision on the spot. The good judge isn’t the one who meticulously analyzes every claim but rather the one who, aiming for fair justice, provides clear guidance for litigants. The good lawyer isn’t the one who considers every possible angle and qualifies every detail but the one who wholeheartedly commits to your side, helping you out of a difficult situation. Dr. Johnson once said, in one of his eloquent sentences, “Miserable beyond all names of wretchedness is that unfortunate couple who are forced to outline all the details of each everyday situation based on abstract principles of reason. There are times when little can be said, and much must be done.”

The second substitute for temperament is drill, the power of use and routine. The hack is a better roadster than the Arab barb. In chemistry, the galvanic stream, slow, but continuous, is equal in power to the electric spark, and is, in our arts, a better agent. So in human action, against the spasm of energy, we offset the continuity of drill. We spread the same amount of force over much time, instead of condensing it into a moment. 'Tis the same ounce of gold here in a ball, and there in a leaf. At West Point, Col. Buford, the chief engineer, pounded with a hammer on the trunnions of a cannon, until he broke them off. He fired a piece of ordnance some hundred times in swift succession, until it burst. Now which stroke broke the trunnion? Every stroke. Which blast burst the piece? Every blast. "Diligence passe sens" Henry VIII. was wont to say, or, great is drill. John Kemble said, that the worst provincial company of actors would go through a play better than the best amateur company. Basil Hall likes to show that the worst regular troops will beat the best volunteers. Practice is nine tenths. A course of mobs is good practice for orators. All the great speakers were bad speakers at first. Stumping it through England for seven years, made Cobden a consummate debater. Stumping it through New England for twice seven, trained Wendell Phillips. The way to learn German, is, to read the same dozen pages over and over a hundred times, till you know every word and particle in them, and can pronounce and repeat them by heart. No genius can recite a ballad at first reading, so well as mediocrity can at the fifteenth or twentieth reading. The rule for hospitality and Irish 'help,' is, to have the same dinner every day throughout the year. At last, Mrs. O'Shaughnessy learns to cook it to a nicety, the host learns to carve it, and the guests are well served. A humorous friend of mine thinks, that the reason why Nature is so perfect in her art, and gets up such inconceivably fine sunsets, is, that she has learned how, at last, by dint of doing the same thing so very often. Cannot one converse better on a topic on which he has experience, than on one which is new? Men whose opinion is valued on 'Change, are only such as have a special experience, and off that ground their opinion is not valuable, "More are made good by exercitation, than by nature," said Democritus. The friction in nature is so enormous that we cannot spare any power. It is not question to express our thought, to elect our way, but to overcome resistances of the medium and material in everything we do. Hence the use of drill, and the worthlessness of amateurs to cope with practitioners. Six hours every day at the piano, only to give facility of touch; six hours a day at painting, only to give command of the odious materials, oil, ochres, and brushes. The masters say, that they know a master in music, only by seeing the pose of the hands on the keys;—so difficult and vital an act is the command of the instrument. To have learned the use of the tools, by thousands of manipulations; to have learned the arts of reckoning, by endless adding and dividing, is the power of the mechanic and the clerk. I remarked in England, in confirmation of a frequent experience at home, that, in literary circles, the men of trust and consideration, bookmakers, editors, university deans and professors, bishops, too, were by no means men of the largest literary talent, but usually of a low and ordinary intellectuality, with a sort of mercantile activity and working talent. Indifferent hacks and mediocrities tower, by pushing their forces to a lucrative point, or by working power, over multitudes of superior men, in Old as in New England.

The second substitute for temperament is practice, the power of use and routine. The workhorse is a better road horse than the Arabian stallion. In chemistry, the slow, steady galvanic current is equally powerful as the electric spark, and in our crafts, it's a better tool. Just like in human actions, we counteract bursts of energy with the consistency of practice. We distribute the same amount of effort over a longer time instead of compressing it into a moment. It's the same ounce of gold here in a ball, and there in a leaf. At West Point, Col. Buford, the chief engineer, hammered on the trunnions of a cannon until he broke them off. He fired a piece of artillery several hundred times in quick succession until it exploded. So, which strike broke the trunnion? Every strike. Which shot caused the explosion? Every shot. "Diligence surpasses talent," Henry VIII used to say, or, great is practice. John Kemble pointed out that the worst provincial acting troupe would perform a play better than the best amateur company. Basil Hall shows that the worst regular troops will outperform the best volunteers. Practice is nine-tenths of success. A series of crowds is good practice for speakers. All great speakers were not good at first. Campaigning in England for seven years made Cobden a skilled debater. Speaking through New England for fourteen years trained Wendell Phillips. The way to learn German is to read the same dozen pages repeatedly, until you know every word and detail and can say them by heart. No genius can recite a ballad on first reading as well as an average person can after the fifteenth or twentieth reading. The rule for hospitality and Irish service is to serve the same dinner every day throughout the year. Eventually, Mrs. O'Shaughnessy perfects the recipe, the host learns how to carve, and the guests are well served. A humorous friend of mine believes that the reason Nature is so skilled in her craft, producing such incredibly beautiful sunsets, is because she has perfected her technique through repetition. Can someone speak more effectively on a subject they know well than on one that is new? People whose opinions are valued on Wall Street are only those with specialized experience, and without that, their opinions aren't valuable. "More are made good by practice than by nature," said Democritus. The friction in nature is so great that we cannot waste any energy. It’s not just about expressing our thoughts or making decisions, but overcoming the resistances we encounter in everything we do. Hence, the value of practice and the ineffectiveness of amateurs compared to professionals. Six hours at the piano each day only to develop finger dexterity; six hours painting just to master the difficult materials like oil, pigments, and brushes. The masters say they can identify a master in music just by seeing how they position their hands on the keys—such a difficult and essential act is mastering the instrument. Learning to use the tools through countless repetitions; mastering the skills of calculation through endless addition and division, is what empowers tradespeople and clerks. I noticed in England, confirming a common experience at home, that in literary circles, trusted and respected figures like publishers, editors, university deans, professors, and even bishops, are not necessarily the most gifted writers; they often possess only average intellect but have a kind of business acumen and practical talent. Mediocre individuals often rise above far more talented people by pushing their effort to profitable levels or by working efficiently with large numbers in both Old and New England.

I have not forgotten that there are sublime considerations which limit the value of talent and superficial success. We can easily overpraise the vulgar hero. There are sources on which we have not drawn. I know what I abstain from. I adjourn what I have to say on this topic to the chapters on Culture and Worship. But this force or spirit, being the means relied on by Nature for bringing the work of the day about,—as far as we attach importance to household life, and the prizes of the world, we must respect that. And I hold, that an economy may be applied to it; it is as much a subject of exact law and arithmetic as fluids and gases are; it may be husbanded, or wasted; every man is efficient only as he is a container or vessel of this force, and never was any signal act or achievement in history, but by this expenditure. This is not gold, but the gold-maker; not the fame, but the exploit.

I haven’t forgotten that there are deep considerations that limit the value of talent and shallow success. We can easily praise the common hero too much. There are resources we haven’t tapped into. I know what I choose not to engage with. I’ll save what I have to say on this subject for the chapters on Culture and Worship. But this force or spirit, being the means that Nature uses to get things done each day, is something we need to respect as long as we value daily life and worldly achievements. I believe we can apply an economy to it; it is just as much a subject of precise law and math as fluids and gases. It can be nurtured or squandered; every person is effective only as they contain or channel this force, and there has never been a significant act or achievement in history that didn’t come from this expenditure. This isn’t gold, but the creator of gold; not the fame, but the act.

If these forces and this husbandry are within reach of our will, and the laws of them can be read, we infer that all success, and all conceivable benefit for man, is also, first or last, within his reach, and has its own sublime economies by which it may be attained. The world is mathematical, and has no casualty, in all its vast and flowing curve. Success has no more eccentricity, than the gingham and muslin we weave in our mills. I know no more affecting lesson to our busy, plotting New England brains, than to go into one of the factories with which we have lined all the watercourses in the States. A man hardly knows how much he is a machine, until he begins to make telegraph, loom, press, and locomotive, in his own image. But in these, he is forced to leave out his follies and hindrances, so that when we go to the mill, the machine is more moral than we. Let a man dare go to a loom, and see if he be equal to it. Let machine confront machine, and see how they come out. The world-mill is more complex than the calico-mill, and the architect stooped less. In the gingham-mill, a broken thread or a shred spoils the web through a piece of a hundred yards, and is traced back to the girl that wove it, and lessens her wages. The stockholder, on being shown this, rubs his hands with delight. Are you so cunning, Mr. Profitless, and do you expect to swindle your master and employer, in the web you weave? A day is a more magnificent cloth than any muslin, the mechanism that makes it is infinitely cunninger, and you shall not conceal the sleezy, fraudulent, rotten hours you have slipped into the piece, nor fear that any honest thread, or straighter steel, or more inflexible shaft, will not testify in the web.

If these forces and this farming are within our control, and we can understand their laws, we conclude that all success and any benefit for humanity is also, in some way, attainable, with its own grand systems that can help us achieve it. The world is mathematical and lacks randomness in all its vast and flowing design. Success isn't any more erratic than the gingham and muslin we produce in our factories. There’s no more impactful lesson for our industrious, strategic New England minds than to visit one of the factories that we've set up along all the waterways in the states. A person hardly realizes how much they are a machine until they start to create telegraphs, looms, presses, and locomotives in their own likeness. However, in these endeavors, they must set aside their foolishness and obstacles so that when we visit the mill, the machine is more ethical than we are. Let someone dare to approach a loom and see if they can match it. Let machine face machine and see the outcome. The world-mill is more intricate than the calico-mill, and the architect can bend less. In the gingham-mill, a single broken thread or a small flaw damages the product over a length of a hundred yards and can be traced back to the girl who wove it, affecting her pay. When a stockholder sees this, they can't help but feel pleased. Are you so clever, Mr. Profitless, thinking you can deceive your master and employer in the fabric you create? A day is a far grander fabric than any muslin, the process that creates it is infinitely smarter, and you won’t be able to hide the weak, deceitful, wasted hours you’ve added to the mix, nor should you fear that any honest thread, or straighter metal, or stiffer shaft won’t testify in the fabric.

III.

III.

WEALTH.

RICHES.

Who shall tell what did befall,
Far away in time, when once,
Over the lifeless ball,
Hung idle stars and suns?
What god the element obeyed?
Wings of what wind the lichen bore,
Wafting the puny seeds of power,
Which, lodged in rock, the rock abrade?
And well the primal pioneer
Knew the strong task to it assigned
Patient through Heaven's enormous year
To build in matter home for mind.
From air the creeping centuries drew
The matted thicket low and wide,
This must the leaves of ages strew
The granite slab to clothe and hide,
Ere wheat can wave its golden pride.
What smiths, and in what furnace, rolled
(In dizzy æons dim and mute
The reeling brain can ill compute)
Copper and iron, lead, and gold?
What oldest star the fame can save
Of races perishing to pave
The planet with a floor of lime?
Dust is their pyramid and mole:
Who saw what ferns and palms were pressed
Under the tumbling mountain's breast,
In the safe herbal of the coal?
But when the quarried means were piled,
All is waste and worthless, till
Arrives the wise selecting will,
And, out of slime and chaos, Wit
Draws the threads of fair and fit.
Then temples rose, and towns, and marts,
The shop of toil, the hall of arts;
Then flew the sail across the seas
To feed the North from tropic trees;
The storm-wind wove, the torrent span,
Where they were bid the rivers ran;
New slaves fulfilled the poet's dream,
Galvanic wire, strong-shouldered steam.
Then docks were built, and crops were stored,
And ingots added to the hoard.
But, though light-headed man forget,
Remembering Matter pays her debt:
Still, through her motes and masses, draw
Electric thrills and ties of Law,
Which bind the strengths of Nature wild
To the conscience of a child.
Who can say what happened long ago,
In a time far removed, when once,
Over the lifeless earth,
Stars and suns hung idly?
Which god controlled the elements?
What winds carried the lichen,
Floating the tiny seeds of power,
That, lodged in rock, wore it away?
And surely the first pioneer
Knew the challenging task at hand
Patient throughout Heaven's vast years
To create in matter a home for thought.
From the air, the creeping centuries took
The thick growth, low and wide,
This must be what the leaves of time scattered
To cover and hide the granite slab,
Before wheat can wave its golden beauty.
What blacksmiths, and in what furnace, forged
(In dizzy ages dim and silent
The spinning mind can hardly grasp)
Copper, iron, lead, and gold?
What ancient star can remember the glory
Of races fading away to lay
The planet with a bed of lime?
Dust is their tomb and dirt:
Who saw what ferns and palms were crushed
Under the collapsing mountains,
In the safe greenery of the coal?
But when the quarried resources were gathered,
Everything is waste and useless, until
The wise selecting will appears,
And, from muck and chaos, Intelligence
Weaves the threads of what is fair and fitting.
Then temples rose, and towns, and markets,
The workshop of toil, the hall of arts;
Then sails raced across the seas
To supply the North from tropical trees;
The storm winds wove, the torrents spanned,
Where they were called, the rivers flowed;
New slaves fulfilled the poet's vision,
Electric wires, strong steam engines.
Then docks were constructed, and crops were stored,
And ingots added to the treasure.
But, although light-headed humans forget,
Matter, remembering, pays its debts:
Still, through her particles and masses, draw
Electric thrills and connections of Law,
Which link the strengths of wild Nature
To the conscience of a child.

WEALTH.

RICHES.

As soon as a stranger is introduced into any company, one of the first questions which all wish to have answered, is, How does that man get his living? And with reason. He is no whole man until he knows how to earn a blameless livelihood. Society is barbarous, until every industrious man can get his living without dishonest customs.

As soon as a stranger joins any group, one of the first questions everyone wants answered is, "How does that person make a living?" And that makes sense. They aren't a complete person until they can earn an honest living. Society is uncivilized until every hardworking person can support themselves without resorting to dishonest practices.

Every man is a consumer, and ought to be a producer. He fails to make his place good in the world, unless he not only pays his debt, but also adds something to the common wealth. Nor can he do justice to his genius, without making some larger demand on the world than a bare subsistence. He is by constitution expensive, and needs to be rich.

Every guy is a consumer and should be a producer. He doesn’t truly secure his spot in the world unless he not only pays his bills but also contributes something to the common good. Plus, he can't fully express his potential without making a bigger impact on the world than just getting by. By nature, he has expensive tastes and needs to be wealthy.

Wealth has its source in applications of the mind to nature, from the rudest strokes of spade and axe, up to the last secrets of art. Intimate ties subsist between thought and all production; because a better order is equivalent to vast amounts of brute labor. The forces and the resistances are Nature's, but the mind acts in bringing things from where they abound to where they are wanted; in wise combining; in directing the practice of the useful arts, and in the creation of finer values, by fine art, by eloquence, by song, or the reproductions of memory. Wealth is in applications of mind to nature, and the art of getting rich consists not in industry, much less in saving, but in a better order, in timeliness, in being at the right spot. One man has stronger arms, or longer legs; another sees by the course of streams, and growth of markets, where land will be wanted, makes a clearing to the river, goes to sleep, and wakes up rich. Steam is no stronger now, than it was a hundred years ago; but is put to better use. A clever fellow was acquainted with the expansive force of steam; he also saw the wealth of wheat and grass rotting in Michigan. Then he cunningly screws on the steam-pipe to the wheat-crop. Puff now, O Steam! The steam puffs and expands as before, but this time it is dragging all Michigan at its back to hungry New York and hungry England. Coal lay in ledges under the ground since the Flood, until a laborer with pick and windlass brings it to the surface. We may well call it black diamonds. Every basket is power and civilization. For coal is a portable climate. It carries the heat of the tropics to Labrador and the polar circle: and it is the means of transporting itself whithersoever it is wanted. Watt and Stephenson whispered in the ear of mankind their secret, that a half-ounce of coal will draw two tons a mile, and coal carries coal, by rail and by boat, to make Canada as warm as Calcutta, and with its comfort brings its industrial power.

Wealth comes from applying our minds to nature, from the simplest use of a shovel and axe to the most advanced artistic skills. There are strong connections between thinking and all types of production because organizing things better is the same as doing a lot of hard labor. Nature provides the forces and obstacles, but the mind helps move resources from where there is plenty to where they’re needed; it helps create smart combinations, directs useful practices, and generates greater value through art, communication, music, or memory. Wealth stems from using our minds to work with nature, and getting rich is less about hard work or saving money and more about organization, timing, and being in the right place at the right time. One person may have stronger arms or longer legs; another understands how rivers flow and market trends to anticipate where land will be in demand, clears a path to the river, sleeps, and wakes up wealthy. Steam is no more powerful now than it was a hundred years ago; it’s just used more effectively. A clever individual recognized the power of steam and saw the wealth of wasted wheat and grass in Michigan. So, he smartly connected the steam pipe to the wheat crop. Now, steam is pushing all that Michigan bounty toward hungry New York and England. Coal has been under the ground since the Flood, waiting until a worker with tools brings it to light. We can rightfully call it black diamonds. Every basket of coal represents power and progress. Coal is a movable climate, bringing tropical warmth to places like Labrador and the Arctic Circle while being transported wherever it's needed. Watt and Stephenson revealed to humanity that just half an ounce of coal can pull two tons a mile, and coal moves coal, by train and by ship, making Canada as warm as Calcutta and bringing its industrial strength.

When the farmer's peaches are taken from under the tree, and carried into town, they have a new look, and a hundredfold value over the fruit which grew on the same bough, and lies fulsomely on the ground. The craft of the merchant is this bringing a thing from where it abounds, to where it is costly.

When the farmer's peaches are picked from under the tree and taken into town, they have a fresh appearance and are worth a hundred times more than the ones that grew on the same branch and are rotten on the ground. The merchant's skill lies in taking something from where there's plenty to where it’s valuable.

Wealth begins in a tight roof that keeps the rain and wind out; in a good pump that yields you plenty of sweet water; in two suits of clothes, so to change your dress when you are wet; in dry sticks to burn; in a good double-wick lamp; and three meals; in a horse, or a locomotive, to cross the land; in a boat to cross the sea; in tools to work with; in books to read; and so, in giving, on all sides, by tools and auxiliaries, the greatest possible extension to our powers, as if it added feet, and hands, and eyes, and blood, length to the day, and knowledge, and good-will.

Wealth starts with a sturdy roof that keeps out the rain and wind; a good pump that provides plenty of fresh water; two sets of clothes so you can change when you're wet; dry firewood; a reliable double-wick lamp; and three meals a day; a horse or a train to travel across land; a boat to sail on the sea; tools to work with; books to read; and in giving, from all directions, by tools and support, the greatest possible expansion of our abilities, as if it added feet, hands, eyes, and blood, extending our days, knowledge, and kindness.

Wealth begins with these articles of necessity. And here we must recite the iron law which Nature thunders in these northern climates. First, she requires that each man should feed himself. If, happily, his fathers have left him no inheritance, he must go to work, and by making his wants less, or his gains more, he must draw himself out of that state of pain and insult in which she forces the beggar to lie. She gives him no rest until this is done: she starves, taunts, and torments him, takes away warmth, laughter, sleep, friends, and daylight, until he has fought his way to his own loaf. Then, less peremptorily, but still with sting enough, she urges him to the acquisition of such things as belong to him. Every warehouse and shop-window, every fruit-tree, every thought of every hour, opens a new want to him, which it concerns his power and dignity to gratify. It is of no use to argue the wants down: the philosophers have laid the greatness of man in making his wants few; but will a man content himself with a hut and a handful of dried pease? He is born to be rich. He is thoroughly related; and is tempted out by his appetites and fancies to the conquest of this and that piece of nature, until he finds his well-being in the use of his planet, and of more planets than his own. Wealth requires, besides the crust of bread and the roof,—the freedom of the city, the freedom of the earth, travelling, machinery, the benefits of science, music, and fine arts, the best culture, and the best company. He is the rich man who can avail himself of all men's faculties. He is the richest man who knows how to draw a benefit from the labors of the greatest number of men, of men in distant countries, and in past times. The same correspondence that is between thirst in the stomach, and water in the spring, exists between the whole of man and the whole of nature. The elements offer their service to him. The sea, washing the equator and the poles, offers its perilous aid, and the power and empire that follow it,—day by day to his craft and audacity. "Beware of me," it says, "but if you can hold me, I am the key to all the lands." Fire offers, on its side, an equal power. Fire, steam, lightning, gravity, ledges of rock, mines of iron, lead, quicksilver, tin, and gold; forests of all woods; fruits of all climates; animals of all habits; the powers of tillage; the fabrics of his chemic laboratory; the webs of his loom; the masculine draught of his locomotive, the talismans of the machine-shop; all grand and subtile things, minerals, gases, ethers, passions, war, trade, government, are his natural playmates, and, according to the excellence of the machinery in each human being, is his attraction for the instruments he is to employ. The world is his tool-chest, and he is successful, or his education is carried on just so far, as is the marriage of his faculties with nature, or, the degree in which he takes up things into himself.

Wealth starts with these essential items. Here, we must acknowledge the undeniable truth that nature dictates in these northern regions. First, everyone must fend for themselves. If, by chance, someone has no inheritance from their parents, they need to work. By either reducing their needs or increasing their income, they must lift themselves out of the suffering and humiliation where nature forces the beggar to remain. Nature gives no respite until this happens: she starves, mocks, and torments him, stripping away warmth, laughter, sleep, friends, and sunlight until he secures his own bread. Then, with less urgency but still with enough pressure, she pushes him to acquire things that are rightfully his. Every store and display window, every fruit tree, and every thought in every hour opens up a new desire that reflects his power and dignity to fulfill. It's pointless to dismiss these wants: philosophers have suggested that greatness lies in having fewer desires, but will a person be satisfied living in a shack with just a handful of dried peas? They are meant to be prosperous. They are deeply connected to the world and are driven by their cravings and dreams to conquer parts of nature until they find fulfillment in using not only their own planet but others too. Wealth requires more than just bread and shelter; it includes freedom in the city, freedom over the earth, travel, technology, the benefits of science, music and fine arts, the best education, and the best companionship. The truly wealthy individual is the one who can take advantage of the abilities of others. The richest person is the one who can benefit from the work of countless others, including those from faraway lands and from history. Just as thirst in the stomach relates to water in the spring, the entirety of humanity connects to the entirety of nature. The elements offer their services. The sea, extending from the equator to the poles, presents its risky assistance and the power and dominion that come with it—offering daily opportunities for skill and daring. "Beware of me," it cautions, "but if you can master me, I am the key to all lands." Fire offers an equal power as well. Fire, steam, lightning, gravity, rock outcrops, and mines of iron, lead, mercury, tin, and gold; forests of all types; fruits from every climate; animals of all kinds; agricultural strengths; the products of chemistry; the threads of weaving; the force of locomotives; the tools of the machine shop— all wonderful and subtle elements, including minerals, gases, ethers, passions, war, trade, and governance—are natural companions to him. His success depends on how well he integrates his abilities with nature and the extent to which he internalizes things.

The strong race is strong on these terms. The Saxons are the merchants of the world; now, for a thousand years, the leading race, and by nothing more than their quality of personal independence, and, in its special modification, pecuniary independence. No reliance for bread and games on the government, no clanship, no patriarchal style of living by the revenues of a chief, no marrying-on,—no system of clientship suits them; but every man must pay his scot. The English are prosperous and peaceable, with their habit of considering that every man must take care of himself, and has himself to thank, if he do not maintain and improve his position in society.

The strong race thrives on these terms. The Saxons are the world's merchants; for the past thousand years, they’ve been the leading race, and it’s all due to their quality of personal independence, particularly in financial matters. They don’t depend on the government for food and entertainment, don’t have clans, don’t live in a patriarchal system supported by a chief’s income, and don’t rely on marrying into wealth—everyone must take responsibility for their own finances. The English are successful and peaceful, with the belief that each person must take care of themselves and is solely responsible for maintaining and improving their status in society.

The subject of economy mixes itself with morals, inasmuch as it is a peremptory point of virtue that a man's independence be secured. Poverty demoralizes. A man in debt is so far a slave; and Wall-street thinks it easy for a millionaire to be a man of his word, a man of honor, but, that, in failing circumstances, no man can be relied on to keep his integrity. And when one observes in the hotels and palaces of our Atlantic capitals, the habit of expense, the riot of the senses, the absence of bonds, clanship, fellow-feeling of any kind, he feels, that, when a man or a woman is driven to the wall, the chances of integrity are frightfully diminished, as if virtue were coming to be a luxury which few could afford, or, as Burke said, "at a market almost too high for humanity." He may fix his inventory of necessities and of enjoyments on what scale he pleases, but if he wishes the power and privilege of thought, the chalking out his own career, and having society on his own terms, he must bring his wants within his proper power to satisfy.

The topic of the economy is closely connected to morals because it is essential for a person's independence to be guaranteed. Poverty demoralizes. A person in debt is essentially a slave; and Wall Street believes it's easy for a millionaire to be trustworthy and honorable, but in tough times, no one can be counted on to maintain their integrity. When you look at the hotels and palaces of our East Coast cities, the tendency to spend, the indulgence of the senses, and the lack of community and belonging are shocking. You realize that when someone is pushed to their limits, the chances of them acting with integrity drop significantly, as if virtue is becoming a luxury that only a few can afford, or, as Burke put it, "at a market almost too high for humanity." A person can decide what they need and want on whatever scale they choose, but if they want the ability to think for themselves, chart their own path, and have society on their own terms, they must align their wants with what they can actually afford.

The manly part is to do with might and main what you can do. The world is full of fops who never did anything, and who have persuaded beauties and men of genius to wear their fop livery, and these will deliver the fop opinion, that it is not respectable to be seen earning a living; that it is much more respectable to spend without earning; and this doctrine of the snake will come also from the elect sons of light; for wise men are not wise at all hours, and will speak five times from their taste or their humor, to once from their reason. The brave workman, who might betray his feeling of it in his manners, if he do not succumb in his practice, must replace the grace or elegance forfeited, by the merit of the work done. No matter whether he make shoes, or statues, or laws. It is the privilege of any human work which is well done to invest the doer with a certain haughtiness. He can well afford not to conciliate, whose faithful work will answer for him. The mechanic at his bench carries a quiet heart and assured manners, and deals on even terms with men of any condition. The artist has made his picture so true, that it disconcerts criticism. The statue is so beautiful, that it contracts no stain from the market, but makes the market a silent gallery for itself. The case of the young lawyer was pitiful to disgust,—a paltry matter of buttons or tweezer-cases; but the determined youth saw in it an aperture to insert his dangerous wedges, made the insignificance of the thing forgotten, and gave fame by his sense and energy to the name and affairs of the Tittleton snuffbox factory.

The manly part is all about doing what you can with all your strength. The world is filled with show-offs who have never done anything themselves, yet they’ve convinced attractive people and talented individuals to adopt their pretentious ways. These show-offs will express the view that it's not respectable to earn a living; instead, it’s far more respectable to spend money without earning it. This twisted notion will also come from the so-called enlightened ones; wise people aren't always wise, and they will speak from their tastes or moods five times more than from their reasoning. The brave worker, who might show his feelings through his behavior, as long as he doesn’t compromise in what he does, must make up for any lost grace or elegance through the quality of his work. It doesn’t matter if he’s making shoes, sculptures, or laws. Any well-done human work gives the doer a sense of pride. He doesn’t need to seek approval when his reliable work speaks for him. A mechanic at his bench carries a calm heart and confident demeanor, interacting equally with everyone. The artist creates a piece so genuine that it renders criticism pointless. The sculpture is so stunning that it doesn’t lose its value in the market but instead turns the market into a silent gallery for itself. The situation of the young lawyer was pitiful and ridiculous—a trivial matter of buttons or tweezer cases; but the determined young man saw it as a chance to make a significant impact, making the triviality forgettable and bringing recognition through his insight and energy to the name and business of the Tittleton snuffbox factory.

Society in large towns is babyish, and wealth is made a toy. The life of pleasure is so ostentatious, that a shallow observer must believe that this is the agreed best use of wealth, and, whatever is pretended, it ends in cosseting. But, if this were the main use of surplus capital, it would bring us to barricades, burned towns, and tomahawks, presently. Men of sense esteem wealth to be the assimilation of nature to themselves, the converting of the sap and juices of the planet to the incarnation and nutriment of their design. Power is what they want,—not candy;—power to execute their design, power to give legs and feet, form and actuality to their thought, which, to a clear-sighted man, appears the end for which the Universe exists, and all its resources might be well applied. Columbus thinks that the sphere is a problem for practical navigation, as well as for closet geometry, and looks on all kings and peoples as cowardly landsmen, until they dare fit him out. Few men on the planet have more truly belonged to it. But he was forced to leave much of his map blank. His successors inherited his map, and inherited his fury to complete it.

Society in big cities is immature, and wealth is treated like a toy. The pursuit of pleasure is so showy that a superficial observer might think this is the best way to use wealth, and, despite what people pretend, it leads to indulgence. However, if this were the primary purpose of extra money, it would soon lead us to violence, destroyed cities, and chaos. Wise individuals see wealth as a way to transform nature to suit their needs, turning the resources of the planet into the realization and nourishment of their goals. What they seek is power—not frivolity; power to bring their ideas to life, to give shape and reality to their thoughts, which to a clear-headed person seems to be the reason the Universe exists and how all its resources could be best used. Columbus believes that the globe is not just a puzzle for theoretical study, but also for practical navigation, viewing all rulers and nations as timid land-dwellers until they have the courage to support him. Few people have had a deeper connection to the Earth. But he had to leave much of his map unfinished. His successors inherited his map, along with his passion to fill it in.

So the men of the mine, telegraph, mill, map, and survey,—the monomaniacs, who talk up their project in marts, and offices, and entreat men to subscribe:—how did our factories get built? how did North America get netted with iron rails, except by the importunity of these orators, who dragged all the prudent men in? Is party the madness of many for the gain of a few? This speculative genius is the madness of few for the gain of the world. The projectors are sacrificed, but the public is the gainer. Each of these idealists, working after his thought, would make it tyrannical, if he could. He is met and antagonized by other speculators, as hot as he. The equilibrium is preserved by these counteractions, as one tree keeps down another in the forest, that it may not absorb all the sap in the ground. And the supply in nature of railroad presidents, copper-miners, grand-junctioners, smoke-burners, fire-annihilators, &c., is limited by the same law which keeps the proportion in the supply of carbon, of alum, and of hydrogen.

So the workers in the mine, telegraph, mill, map, and survey—the obsessed ones who promote their projects in markets and offices and plead with people to invest—how did our factories get built? How did North America get covered in iron rails, if not by the persistence of these speakers who pulled in all the sensible folks? Is political parties just a case of the madness of many benefiting a few? This speculative genius is the madness of a few for the benefit of everyone. The visionaries are sacrificed, but the public benefits. Each of these idealists, pursuing their ideas, would impose their will if they could. They are challenged and countered by other equally eager speculators. The balance is maintained by these opposing forces, just like one tree holds back another in the forest to prevent it from absorbing all the nutrients from the ground. And the number of natural resources like railroad presidents, copper miners, grand junctioners, smoke reducers, fire eliminators, etc., is limited by the same principles that regulate the supply of carbon, alum, and hydrogen.

To be rich is to have a ticket of admission to the master-works and chief men of each race. It is to have the sea, by voyaging; to visit the mountains, Niagara, the Nile, the desert, Rome, Paris, Constantinople; to see galleries, libraries, arsenals, manufactories. The reader of Humboldt's "Cosmos" follows the marches of a man whose eyes, ears, and mind are armed by all the science, arts, and implements which mankind have any where accumulated, and who is using these to add to the stock. So is it with Denon, Beckford, Belzoni, Wilkinson, Layard, Kane, Lepsius, and Livingston. "The rich man," says Saadi, "is everywhere expected and at home." The rich take up something more of the world into man's life. They include the country as well as the town, the ocean-side, the White Hills, the Far West, and the old European homesteads of man, in their notion of available material. The world is his, who has money to go over it. He arrives at the sea-shore, and a sumptuous ship has floored and carpeted for him the stormy Atlantic, and made it a luxurious hotel, amid the horrors of tempests. The Persians say, "'Tis the same to him who wears a shoe, as if the whole earth were covered with leather."

Being wealthy means having access to the masterpieces and prominent figures of every culture. It allows you to sail the seas, explore the mountains, visit places like Niagara, the Nile, the desert, Rome, Paris, and Istanbul; to experience galleries, libraries, military arsenals, and factories. The reader of Humboldt's "Cosmos" follows the journey of a person equipped with all the science, arts, and tools that humanity has gathered, using them to contribute to our collective knowledge. This is true for Denon, Beckford, Belzoni, Wilkinson, Layard, Kane, Lepsius, and Livingston as well. “The rich man,” says Saadi, “is expected everywhere and feels at home.” Wealthy individuals bring more of the world into our lives. They embrace not just cities, but also countryside, seaside, the White Mountains, the American West, and the ancient European settlements as part of their view of accessible resources. The world belongs to those who can afford to explore it. When they reach the shoreline, a lavish ship has prepared a comfortable space for them on the rough Atlantic, turning it into an elegant hotel amid the storms. The Persians say, "For someone who wears a shoe, it’s as if the whole world were covered in leather."

Kings are said to have long arms, but every man should have long arms, and should pluck his living, his instruments, his power, and his knowing, from the sun, moon, and stars. Is not then the demand to be rich legitimate? Yet, I have never seen a rich man. I have never seen a man as rich as all men ought to be, or, with an adequate command of nature. The pulpit and the press have many commonplaces denouncing the thirst for wealth; but if men should take these moralists at their word, and leave off aiming to be rich, the moralists would rush to rekindle at all hazards this love of power in the people, lest civilization should be undone. Men are urged by their ideas to acquire the command over nature. Ages derive a culture from the wealth of Roman Cæsars, Leo Tenths, magnificent Kings of France, Grand Dukes of Tuscany, Dukes of Devonshire, Townleys, Vernons, and Peels, in England; or whatever great proprietors. It is the interest of all men, that there should be Vaticans and Louvres full of noble works of art; British Museums, and French Gardens of Plants, Philadelphia Academies of Natural History, Bodleian, Ambrosian, Royal, Congressional Libraries. It is the interest of all that there should be Exploring Expeditions; Captain Cooks to voyage round the world, Rosses, Franklins, Richardsons, and Kanes, to find the magnetic and the geographic poles. We are all richer for the measurement of a degree of latitude on the earth's surface. Our navigation is safer for the chart. How intimately our knowledge of the system of the Universe rests on that!—and a true economy in a state or an individual will forget its frugality in behalf of claims like these.

Kings are said to have far-reaching influence, but every person should also have that reach and should derive their livelihood, their tools, their power, and their understanding from the sun, moon, and stars. So isn’t the desire to be wealthy justified? Yet, I have never encountered a truly rich person. I’ve never come across anyone as wealthy as everyone should be, or with enough mastery over nature. The church and the media often have clichés criticizing the desire for riches; but if people actually took these moralists seriously and stopped aspiring to be wealthy, the moralists would quickly try to revive that passion for power in the public, fearing that civilization might fall apart. People are motivated by their ideas to gain control over nature. Ages have taken cultural wealth from the riches of Roman emperors, Pope Leo X, the magnificent Kings of France, Grand Dukes of Tuscany, Dukes of Devonshire, Townleys, Vernons, and Peels in England; or from any other great landowners. It's in everyone’s interest that there are Vaticans and Louvres filled with remarkable art; British Museums, French Botanical Gardens, Philadelphia Academies of Natural History, Bodleian, Ambrosian, Royal, and Congressional Libraries. It benefits us all that there are Exploring Expeditions; Captain Cooks sailing around the globe, Rosses, Franklins, Richardsons, and Kanes exploring the magnetic and geographic poles. We all gain from knowing how to measure a degree of latitude on the earth’s surface. Our navigation is safer because of the maps. Our understanding of the universe's system relies heavily on that!—and a true economy in a government or an individual will overlook its own frugality for greater claims like these.

Whilst it is each man's interest, that, not only ease and convenience of living, but also wealth or surplus product should exist somewhere, it need not be in his hands. Often it is very undesirable to him. Goethe said well, "nobody should be rich but those who understand it." Some men are born to own, and can animate all their possessions. Others cannot: their owning is not graceful; seems to be a compromise of their character: they seem to steal their own dividends. They should own who can administer; not they who hoard and conceal; not they who, the greater proprietors they are, are only the greater beggars, but they whose work carves out work for more, opens a path for all. For he is the rich man in whom the people are rich, and he is the poor man in whom the people are poor: and how to give all access to the masterpieces of art and nature, is the problem of civilization. The socialism of our day has done good service in setting men on thinking how certain civilizing benefits, now only enjoyed by the opulent, can be enjoyed by all. For example, the providing to each man the means and apparatus of science, and of the arts. There are many articles good for occasional use, which few men are able to own. Every man wishes to see the ring of Saturn, the satellites and belts of Jupiter and Mars; the mountains and craters in the moon: yet how few can buy a telescope! and of those, scarcely one would like the trouble of keeping it in order, and exhibiting it. So of electrical and chemical apparatus, and many the like things. Every man may have occasion to consult books which he does not care to possess, such as cyclopedias, dictionaries, tables, charts, maps, and public documents: pictures also of birds, beasts, fishes, shells, trees, flowers, whose names he desires to know.

While it benefits everyone to have not just comfort and convenience in life, but also wealth or surplus product available somewhere, it doesn’t have to be in their possession. Often, it can be quite undesirable for them. Goethe wisely said, "nobody should be rich but those who understand it." Some people are meant to own and can bring life to all their possessions. Others cannot: their ownership feels awkward and seems to compromise their character; it feels like they’re taking away from their own gains. Those who should own are the ones who can manage; it shouldn’t be those who hoard and hide their wealth; not those who, the more they own, the more they’re just richer beggars, but those whose work creates opportunities for others and opens doors for all. The truly rich person is the one in whom the community is thriving, and the truly poor person is the one in whom the community is struggling. The challenge of civilization is finding ways to give everyone access to the masterpieces of art and nature. Today's socialism has done a great job in making people think about how certain benefits of progress, currently enjoyed only by the wealthy, can be shared by everyone. For instance, providing each person with the tools and resources of science and the arts. There are many valuable items meant for occasional use that few people can actually own. Everyone wants to see Saturn's rings, the moons and bands of Jupiter and Mars, the mountains and craters on the moon; yet how many can afford a telescope? And of those, hardly anyone wants the hassle of maintaining it and showing it off. The same goes for electrical and chemical equipment and many other similar things. Every person might need to consult books they don’t want to own, like encyclopedias, dictionaries, tables, charts, maps, and public documents; also pictures of birds, animals, fish, shells, trees, and flowers whose names they wish to learn.

There is a refining influence from the arts of Design on a prepared mind, which is as positive as that of music, and not to be supplied from any other source. But pictures, engravings, statues, and casts, beside their first cost, entail expenses, as of galleries and keepers for the exhibition; and the use which any man can make of them is rare, and their value, too, is much enhanced by the numbers of men who can share their enjoyment. In the Greek cities, it was reckoned profane, that any person should pretend a property in a work of art, which belonged to all who could behold it. I think sometimes,—could I only have music on my own terms;—could I live in a great city, and know where I could go whenever I wished the ablution and inundation of musical waves,—that were a bath and a medicine.

The arts of design have a powerful impact on an open mind, just like music does, and nothing else can provide that same effect. However, artworks like paintings, engravings, statues, and casts not only come with a purchase price but also require ongoing costs for galleries and curators for display. The way any individual can appreciate these artworks is rare, and their value increases with the number of people who can enjoy them together. In ancient Greek cities, it was considered inappropriate for anyone to claim ownership of a work of art that was meant for everyone to experience. Sometimes I think—if only I could have music on my own terms; if I could live in a big city and know where to go whenever I wanted to be immersed in the waves of music—that would feel like both a refreshment and a remedy.

If properties of this kind were owned by states, towns, and lyceums, they would draw the bonds of neighborhood closer. A town would exist to an intellectual purpose. In Europe, where the feudal forms secure the permanence of wealth in certain families, those families buy and preserve those things, and lay them open to the public. But in America, where democratic institutions divide every estate into small portions, after a few years, the public should step into the place of these proprietors, and provide this culture and inspiration for the citizen.

If properties like these were owned by states, towns, and community centers, they would strengthen the ties of neighborhood. A town would serve an intellectual purpose. In Europe, where feudal systems keep wealth within certain families, those families buy and maintain these properties, making them accessible to the public. However, in America, where democratic institutions break down estates into smaller parts, after a few years, the public should take over these properties and provide culture and inspiration for the citizens.

Man was born to be rich, or, inevitably grows rich by the use of his faculties; by the union of thought with nature. Property is an intellectual production. The game requires coolness, right reasoning, promptness, and patience in the players. Cultivated labor drives out brute labor. An infinite number of shrewd men, in infinite years, have arrived at certain best and shortest ways of doing, and this accumulated skill in arts, cultures, harvestings, curings, manufactures, navigations, exchanges, constitutes the worth of our world to-day.

Man is meant to be wealthy or inevitably becomes wealthy by using his abilities, combining thought with nature. Property is the result of intellect. The game requires composure, sound reasoning, quick action, and patience from the players. Skilled labor replaces unskilled labor. Countless clever people over many years have discovered the best and most efficient methods for doing things, and this accumulated expertise in arts, agriculture, processing, manufacturing, navigation, and trade makes up the value of our world today.

Commerce is a game of skill, which every man cannot play, which few men can play well. The right merchant is one who has the just average of faculties we call common sense; a man of a strong affinity for facts, who makes up his decision on what he has seen. He is thoroughly persuaded of the truths of arithmetic. There is always a reason, in the man, for his good or bad fortune, and so, in making money. Men talk as if there were some magic about this, and believe in magic, in all parts of life. He knows, that all goes on the old road, pound for pound, cent for cent,—for every effect a perfect cause,—and that good luck is another name for tenacity of purpose. He insures himself in every transaction, and likes small and sure gains. Probity and closeness to the facts are the basis, but the masters of the art add a certain long arithmetic. The problem is, to combine many and remote operations, with the accuracy and adherence to the facts, which is easy in near and small transactions; so to arrive at gigantic results, without any compromise of safety. Napoleon was fond of telling the story of the Marseilles banker, who said to his visitor, surprised at the contrast between the splendor of the banker's chateau and hospitality, and the meanness of the counting-room in which he had seen him,—"Young man, you are too young to understand how masses are formed,—the true and only power,—whether composed of money, water, or men, it is all alike,—a mass is an immense centre of motion, but it must be begun, it must be kept up:"—and he might have added, that the way in which it must be begun and kept up, is, by obedience to the law of particles.

Commerce is a skill-based game that not everyone can play, and only a few can play well. The ideal merchant has a good balance of abilities we call common sense; he is someone who strongly connects with facts and bases his decisions on what he has observed. He is firmly convinced of the truths of arithmetic. There’s always a reason, in the person, for his good or bad fortune, especially when it comes to making money. People often talk as if there’s some magic behind this and believe in magic throughout life. He understands that everything follows the same basic principles, pound for pound and cent for cent—there’s a perfect cause for every effect—and that good luck is just another name for persistence. He protects himself in every deal and prefers small, reliable profits. Integrity and a close connection to the facts are fundamental, but the experts in this field also apply a bit of complex mathematics. The challenge is to combine numerous distant operations with accuracy and a commitment to the facts, which is manageable in straightforward, small transactions; thus, achieving massive outcomes without compromising safety. Napoleon used to share the story of a banker from Marseilles who told a visitor, shocked by the contrast between the opulence of the banker’s chateau and hospitality and the simplicity of the counting room, “Young man, you’re too young to grasp how masses are formed—the true and only power—whether made up of money, water, or people, it’s all the same—a mass is a huge center of motion, but it must be initiated and sustained”—and he could have added that the way to initiate and sustain it is by adhering to the law of particles.

Success consists in close appliance to the laws of the world, and, since those laws are intellectual and moral, an intellectual and moral obedience. Political Economy is as good a book wherein to read the life of man, and the ascendency of laws over all private and hostile influences, as any Bible which has come down to us.

Success comes from closely following the laws of the world, and since those laws are both intellectual and moral, it requires an intellectual and moral adherence. Political Economy is just as good a book for understanding human life and the dominance of laws over all personal and conflicting influences as any Bible we have received.

Money is representative, and follows the nature and fortunes of the owner. The coin is a delicate meter of civil, social, and moral changes. The farmer is covetous of his dollar, and with reason. It is no waif to him. He knows how many strokes of labor it represents. His bones ache with the day's work that earned it. He knows how much land it represents;—how much rain, frost, and sunshine. He knows that, in the dollar, he gives you so much discretion and patience, so much hoeing, and threshing. Try to lift his dollar; you must lift all that weight. In the city, where money follows the skit of a pen, or a lucky rise in exchange, it comes to be looked on as light. I wish the farmer held it dearer, and would spend it only for real bread; force for force.

Money is a representation that reflects the character and wealth of its owner. The coin is a sensitive indicator of civil, social, and moral changes. The farmer values his dollar, and rightly so. It isn't just a random amount to him. He knows how many hours of hard work it stands for. His body feels the fatigue from the day he worked to earn it. He understands how much land it signifies—how much rain, frost, and sunshine went into it. He realizes that with the dollar, he entrusts you with his hard work and patience, all the back-breaking hoeing and threshing. If you try to take his dollar, you're also taking all that effort. In the city, where money is just a result of a signature or a stroke of luck in trading, it's often seen as trivial. I wish the farmer valued it more and spent it only on real necessities; an equal exchange for his labor.

The farmer's dollar is heavy, and the clerk's is light and nimble; leaps out of his pocket; jumps on to cards and faro-tables: but still more curious is its susceptibility to metaphysical changes. It is the finest barometer of social storms, and announces revolutions.

The farmer's dollar is substantial, while the clerk's is light and quick; it slips out of his pocket and onto cards and roulette tables. But even more intriguing is its ability to take on different meanings. It serves as a fantastic measure of social upheaval and signals revolutions.

Every step of civil advancement makes every man's dollar worth more. In California, the country where it grew,—what would it buy? A few years since, it would buy a shanty, dysentery, hunger, bad company, and crime. There are wide countries, like Siberia, where it would buy little else to-day, than some petty mitigation of suffering. In Rome, it will buy beauty and magnificence. Forty years ago, a dollar would not buy much in Boston. Now it will buy a great deal more in our old town, thanks to railroads, telegraphs, steamers, and the contemporaneous growth of New York, and the whole country. Yet there are many goods appertaining to a capital city, which are not yet purchasable here, no, not with a mountain of dollars. A dollar in Florida is not worth a dollar in Massachusetts. A dollar is not value, but representative of value, and, at last, of moral values. A dollar is rated for the corn it will buy, or to speak strictly, not for the corn or house-room, but for Athenian corn, and Roman house-room,—for the wit, probity, and power, which we eat bread and dwell in houses to share and exert. Wealth is mental; wealth is moral. The value of a dollar is, to buy just things: a dollar goes on increasing in value with all the genius, and all the virtue of the world. A dollar in a university, is worth more than a dollar in a jail; in a temperate, schooled, law-abiding community, than in some sink of crime, where dice, knives, and arsenic, are in constant play.

Every advancement in society makes every person's dollar worth more. In California, the place where it flourished—what does it buy now? Just a few years ago, it could buy a run-down shack, disease, hunger, bad company, and crime. There are vast areas, like Siberia, where it would buy little more today than a slight easing of suffering. In Rome, it can buy beauty and grandeur. Forty years ago, a dollar didn't get you much in Boston. Now, it can buy a lot more in our old town, thanks to railroads, telegraphs, steamers, and the concurrent growth of New York and the entire country. Yet, there are still many items typical of a major city that you can't buy here, not even with a mountain of dollars. A dollar in Florida isn't worth the same as a dollar in Massachusetts. A dollar isn’t value itself, but represents value, and ultimately, moral values. A dollar is valued for the corn it can purchase, or to be precise, not just for the corn or housing but for Athenian corn and Roman housing—for the wisdom, integrity, and power we share and exert while living in houses and eating bread. Wealth is mental; wealth is moral. The value of a dollar is to buy just things: a dollar increases in value with all the creativity and virtue in the world. A dollar at a university is worth more than a dollar in a jail; in a disciplined, educated, law-abiding community, it has more worth than in a place of crime, where dice, knives, and poison are constantly in use.

The "Bank-Note Detector" is a useful publication. But the current dollar, silver or paper, is itself the detector of the right and wrong where it circulates. Is it not instantly enhanced by the increase of equity? If a trader refuses to sell his vote, or adheres to some odious right, he makes so much more equity in Massachusetts; and every acre in the State is more worth, in the hour of his action. If you take out of State-street the ten honestest merchants, and put in ten roguish persons, controlling the same amount of capital,—the rates of insurance will indicate it; the soundness of banks will show it: the highways will be less secure: the schools will feel it; the children will bring home their little dose of the poison: the judge will sit less firmly on the bench, and his decisions be less upright; he has lost so much support and constraint,—which all need; and the pulpit will betray it, in a laxer rule of life. An apple-tree, if you take out every day for a number of days, a load of loam, and put in a load of sand about its roots,—will find it out. An apple-tree is a stupid kind of creature, but if this treatment be pursued for a short time, I think it would begin to mistrust something. And if you should take out of the powerful class engaged in trade a hundred good men, and put in a hundred bad, or, what is just the same thing, introduce a demoralizing institution, would not the dollar, which is not much stupider than an apple-tree, presently find it out? The value of a dollar is social, as it is created by society. Every man who removes into this city, with any purchasable talent or skill in him, gives to every man's labor in the city, a new worth. If a talent is anywhere born into the world, the community of nations is enriched; and, much more, with a new degree of probity. The expense of crime, one of the principal charges of every nation, is so far stopped. In Europe, crime is observed to increase or abate with the price of bread. If the Rothschilds at Paris do not accept bills, the people at Manchester, at Paisley, at Birmingham, are forced into the highway, and landlords are shot down in Ireland. The police records attest it. The vibrations are presently felt in New York, New Orleans, and Chicago. Not much otherwise, the economical power touches the masses through the political lords. Rothschild refuses the Russian loan, and there is peace, and the harvests are saved. He takes it, and there is war, and an agitation through a large portion of mankind, with every hideous result, ending in revolution, and a new order.

The "Bank-Note Detector" is a helpful resource. But today’s dollar, whether in silver or paper form, itself acts as the measure of right and wrong wherever it circulates. Doesn’t its value instantly increase with greater equity? If a trader chooses not to sell his vote, or sticks to some unpleasant right, he adds more equity in Massachusetts; and every acre in the state becomes more valuable because of his actions. If you replace the ten most honest merchants on State Street with ten dishonest individuals, while keeping the same amount of capital, the insurance rates will reflect that change; the stability of banks will reveal it: the roads will be less safe; the schools will feel the impact; the children will bring home their share of the toxicity; the judge will be less resolute in his decisions, and his rulings will be less fair; he has lost much of the moral support and structure that everyone needs; even the pulpit will show this shift in a more relaxed moral standard. An apple tree, if you keep removing a load of soil each day and replace it with sand around its roots, will eventually notice something is wrong. An apple tree might seem simple, but if this continues for a short time, I believe it would begin to sense an issue. And if you were to take away a hundred good people from the powerful trade class and replace them with a hundred bad ones, or introduce a demoralizing system, wouldn’t the dollar, which isn’t much less aware than an apple tree, quickly detect this change? The value of a dollar is social, created by society. Every person who moves to this city with any marketable talent or skill gives a new value to every worker's labor here. If a talent is born into the world, the global community benefits; and even more so, with a newfound integrity. The cost of crime, one of the main burdens for any nation, is significantly reduced. In Europe, crime rates are seen to rise or fall with the price of bread. If the Rothschilds in Paris refuse to accept bills, people in Manchester, Paisley, and Birmingham are driven to crime, and landlords are killed in Ireland. The police records prove this. The repercussions are soon felt in New York, New Orleans, and Chicago. Similarly, economic power influences the masses through political leaders. If Rothschild rejects the Russian loan, there’s peace and crops are saved. If he accepts it, war breaks out and there’s turmoil for a large portion of humanity, leading to terrible consequences, a revolution, and a new order.

Wealth brings with it its own checks and balances. The basis of political economy is non-interference. The only safe rule is found in the self-adjusting meter of demand and supply. Do not legislate. Meddle, and you snap the sinews with your sumptuary laws. Give no bounties: make equal laws: secure life and property, and you need not give alms. Open the doors of opportunity to talent and virtue, and they will do themselves justice, and property will not be in bad hands. In a free and just commonwealth, property rushes from the idle and imbecile, to the industrious, brave, and persevering.

Wealth has its own checks and balances. The foundation of political economy is non-interference. The only reliable principle is found in the self-regulating balance of supply and demand. Don't legislate. If you interfere, you weaken the system with your restrictive laws. Don't offer bounties: create fair laws: protect life and property, and you won’t have to provide charity. Open the doors of opportunity to talent and integrity, and they will achieve their own success, ensuring property ends up in capable hands. In a free and fair society, property flows from the idle and incompetent to the hardworking, courageous, and persistent.

The laws of nature play through trade, as a toy-battery exhibits the effects of electricity. The level of the sea is not more surely kept, than is the equilibrium of value in society, by the demand and supply: and artifice or legislation punishes itself, by reactions, gluts, and bankruptcies. The sublime laws play indifferently through atoms and galaxies. Whoever knows what happens in the getting and spending of a loaf of bread and a pint of beer; that no wishing will change the rigorous limits of pints and penny loaves; that, for all that is consumed, so much less remains in the basket and pot; but what is gone out of these is not wasted, but well spent, if it nourish his body, and enable him to finish his task;—knows all of political economy that the budgets of empires can teach him. The interest of petty economy is this symbolization of the great economy; the way in which a house, and a private man's methods, tally with the solar system, and the laws of give and take, throughout nature; and, however wary we are of the falsehoods and petty tricks which we suicidally play off on each other, every man has a certain satisfaction, whenever his dealing touches on the inevitable facts; when he sees that things themselves dictate the price, as they always tend to do, and, in large manufactures, are seen to do. Your paper is not fine or coarse enough,—is too heavy, or too thin. The manufacturer says, he will furnish you with just that thickness or thinness you want; the pattern is quite indifferent to him; here is his schedule;—any variety of paper, as cheaper or dearer, with the prices annexed. A pound of paper costs so much, and you may have it made up in any pattern you fancy.

The laws of nature operate through trade, just like a toy battery shows the effects of electricity. The sea's level is maintained as surely as the balance of value in society, guided by demand and supply. Any tricks or laws that try to interfere will end up punishing themselves through reactions, oversupply, and bankruptcies. These fundamental laws work across both atoms and galaxies. If you understand what happens in the buying and spending of a loaf of bread and a pint of beer; that no wishing can change the strict limits of pints and penny loaves; and that whatever is consumed means that much less remains in the basket and pot, but what is taken from them is not wasted, but well spent if it nourishes your body and helps you complete your tasks—then you know everything about political economy that the budgets of nations can teach you. The interest of small-scale economy is this representation of the larger economy; how a household and a person's methods align with the solar system and the laws of give-and-take throughout nature. And, no matter how cautious we are of the lies and petty tricks we play on each other to our own detriment, everyone feels a certain satisfaction when their dealings align with undeniable facts; when they see that things themselves determine the price, as they usually do, especially in large manufacturing. Your paper isn't right—it's either too heavy or too thin. The manufacturer says he can provide exactly the thickness or thinness you need; the pattern doesn’t matter to him. Here’s his price list—any type of paper, cheaper or more expensive, with the prices included. A pound of paper costs this much, and you can have it made in any design you prefer.

There is in all our dealings a self-regulation that supersedes chaffering. You will rent a house, but must have it cheap. The owner can reduce the rent, but so he incapacitates himself from making proper repairs, and the tenant gets not the house he would have, but a worse one; besides, that a relation a little injurious is established between landlord and tenant. You dismiss your laborer, saying, "Patrick, I shall send for you as soon as I cannot do without you." Patrick goes off contented, for he knows that the weeds will grow with the potatoes, the vines must be planted, next week, and, however unwilling you may be, the cantelopes, crook-necks, and cucumbers will send for him. Who but must wish that all labor and value should stand on the same simple and surly market? If it is the best of its kind, it will. We must have joiner, locksmith, planter, priest, poet, doctor, cook, weaver, ostler; each in turn, through the year.

In all our interactions, there's a self-regulation that goes beyond haggling. You want to rent a house, but you need it to be cheap. The owner might lower the rent, but that means they can’t afford to make necessary repairs, and you end up with a worse place than you wanted; plus, it creates a slightly negative relationship between landlord and tenant. You let go of your laborer, saying, "Patrick, I’ll call you as soon as I really need you." Patrick leaves satisfied because he knows that the weeds will grow with the potatoes, the vines need to be planted next week, and no matter how much you hesitate, the cantaloupes, crooknecks, and cucumbers will need him. Who wouldn't wish that all work and value could be assessed in the same straightforward and tough marketplace? If it's the best of its kind, it will be. We need carpenters, locksmiths, farmers, priests, poets, doctors, cooks, weavers, and stable hands; each one at different times throughout the year.

If a St. Michael's pear sells for a shilling, it costs a shilling to raise it. If, in Boston, the best securities offer twelve per cent. for money, they have just six per cent. of insecurity. You may not see that the fine pear costs you a shilling, but it costs the community so much. The shilling represents the number of enemies the pear has, and the amount of risk in ripening it. The price of coal shows the narrowness of the coal-field, and a compulsory confinement of the miners to a certain district. All salaries are reckoned on contingent, as well as on actual services. "If the wind were always southwest by west," said the skipper, "women might take ships to sea." One might say, that all things are of one price; that nothing is cheap or dear; and that the apparent disparities that strike us, are only a shopman's trick of concealing the damage in your bargain. A youth coming into the city from his native New Hampshire farm, with its hard fare still fresh in his remembrance, boards at a first-class hotel, and believes he must somehow have outwitted Dr. Franklin and Malthus, for luxuries are cheap. But he pays for the one convenience of a better dinner, by the loss of some of the richest social and educational advantages. He has lost what guards! what incentives! He will perhaps find by and by, that he left the Muses at the door of the hotel, and found the Furies inside. Money often costs too much, and power and pleasure are not cheap. The ancient poet said, "the gods sell all things at a fair price."

If a St. Michael's pear sells for a shilling, it costs a shilling to grow it. If the best investments in Boston offer twelve percent return, they come with just six percent insecurity. You might not realize that the nice pear costs you a shilling, but that's the cost for the community. The shilling reflects the number of risks the pear faces and the challenges in ripening it. The price of coal indicates how limited the coal field is, forcing miners to work in specific areas. All salaries are calculated based on potential as well as actual work. "If the wind were always southwest by west," said the captain, "women could take ships to sea." You could argue that everything has the same value; nothing is truly cheap or expensive; and the visible differences we notice are just a salesperson's way of hiding the flaws in your deal. A young man coming into the city from his modest New Hampshire farm, still remembering the hard life there, stays at a fancy hotel and believes he must have outsmarted Dr. Franklin and Malthus because luxuries seem affordable. However, he pays for the one benefit of a nicer dinner by sacrificing some of the best social and educational opportunities. He’s lost so much; what protection! What motivation! He may eventually realize that he left the Muses at the hotel entrance and encountered the Furies inside. Money often costs too much, and power and pleasure aren’t actually cheap. The ancient poet said, "the gods sell all things at a fair price."

There is an example of the compensations in the commercial history of this country. When the European wars threw the carrying-trade of the world, from 1800 to 1812, into American bottoms, a seizure was now and then made of an American ship. Of course, the loss was serious to the owner, but the country was indemnified; for we charged threepence a pound for carrying cotton, sixpence for tobacco, and so on; which paid for the risk and loss, and brought into the country an immense prosperity, early marriages, private wealth, the building of cities, and of states: and, after the war was over, we received compensation over and above, by treaty, for all the seizures. Well, the Americans grew rich and great. But the pay-day comes round. Britain, France, and Germany, which our extraordinary profits had impoverished, send out, attracted by the fame of our advantages, first their thousands, then their millions, of poor people, to share the crop. At first, we employ them, and increase our prosperity: but, in the artificial system of society and of protected labor, which we also have adopted and enlarged, there come presently checks and stoppages. Then we refuse to employ these poor men. But they will not so be answered. They go into the poor rates, and, though we refuse wages, we must now pay the same amount in the form of taxes. Again, it turns out that the largest proportion of crimes are committed by foreigners. The cost of the crime, and the expense of courts, and of prisons, we must bear, and the standing army of preventive police we must pay. The cost of education of the posterity of this great colony, I will not compute. But the gross amount of these costs will begin to pay back what we thought was a net gain from our transatlantic customers of 1800. It is vain to refuse this payment. We cannot get rid of these people, and we cannot get rid of their will to be supported. That has become an inevitable element of our politics; and, for their votes, each of the dominant parties courts and assists them to get it executed. Moreover, we have to pay, not what would have contented them at home, but what they have learned to think necessary here; so that opinion, fancy, and all manner of moral considerations complicate the problem.

There’s an example of the compensations in the commercial history of this country. When the European wars disrupted global trade from 1800 to 1812, American ships handled a lot of the carrying trade. Every now and then, an American ship was seized. This loss was significant for the owner, but the country benefited; we charged threepence per pound for transporting cotton, sixpence for tobacco, and so on, which covered the risks and losses and brought immense prosperity to the country, resulting in early marriages, private wealth, and the growth of cities and states. After the war ended, we received additional compensation through treaties for all the seizures. Americans became wealthy and powerful. However, the pay-day eventually comes. Britain, France, and Germany, which suffered losses from our extraordinary profits, began sending their thousands, then eventually millions, of poor people to share in the wealth. Initially, we hired them, and our prosperity increased. But with the artificial societal structure and protected labor we've also adopted and expanded, we soon faced checks and stoppages. Eventually, we stopped hiring these poor people. However, they wouldn’t accept that. They turned to social support, and even though we refused to pay them wages, we ended up paying the same amount in taxes. It then became clear that a significant proportion of crimes are committed by foreigners. We have to bear the costs of crime, as well as the expenses of courts and prisons, and we must fund a standing army of preventive police. I won’t even calculate the cost of educating the children of this large population. Yet, the total amount of these costs will soon start to offset what we believed was a net gain from our transatlantic customers back in 1800. It’s pointless to deny this expense. We can’t get rid of these people, and we can’t escape their need for support. This has become an unavoidable aspect of our politics; and for their votes, both of the major political parties court and help them get what they need. Furthermore, we have to pay not just what would have satisfied them in their home countries, but what they’ve come to believe is necessary here; so opinions, desires, and various moral issues add complexity to the situation.

There are a few measures of economy which will bear to be named without disgust; for the subject is tender, and we may easily have too much of it; and therein resembles the hideous animalcules of which our bodies are built up,—which, offensive in the particular, yet compose valuable and effective masses. Our nature and genius force us to respect ends, whilst we use means. We must use the means, and yet, in our most accurate using, somehow screen and cloak them, as we can only give them any beauty, by a reflection of the glory of the end. That is the good head, which serves the end, and commands the means. The rabble are corrupted by their means: the means are too strong for them, and they desert their end.

There are a few aspects of economy that can be mentioned without discomfort; the topic is sensitive, and we can easily have too much of it. It’s like the unpleasant microorganisms that make up our bodies—offensive in detail, yet they form valuable and effective structures. Our nature and character compel us to respect our goals while we utilize the resources needed to achieve them. We must use these resources, but in doing so, we somewhat need to disguise them because we can only make them appealing by reflecting the greatness of the goal. A wise person serves the goal and directs the resources. The masses are corrupted by their resources: the resources are too powerful for them, and they abandon their goals.

1. The first of these measures is that each man's expense must proceed from his character. As long as your genius buys, the investment is safe, though you spend like a monarch. Nature arms each man with some faculty which enables him to do easily some feat impossible to any other, and thus makes him necessary to society. This native determination guides his labor and his spending. He wants an equipment of means and tools proper to his talent. And to save on this point, were to neutralize the special strength and helpfulness of each mind. Do your work, respecting the excellence of the work, and not its acceptableness. This is so much economy, that, rightly read, it is the sum of economy. Profligacy consists not in spending years of time or chests of money,—but in spending them off the line of your career. The crime which bankrupts men and states, is, job-work;—declining from your main design, to serve a turn here or there. Nothing is beneath you, if it is in the direction of your life: nothing is great or desirable, if it is off from that. I think we are entitled here to draw a straight line, and say, that society can never prosper, but must always be bankrupt, until every man does that which he was created to do.

1. The first of these points is that each person's expenses should reflect their character. As long as your talent guides your spending, it’s a good investment, even if you spend lavishly. Nature equips everyone with a unique skill that allows them to accomplish something effortlessly that others cannot, making them essential to society. This inherent drive directs both their work and their spending. They need the proper tools and resources suited to their abilities. Trying to cut corners here would undermine the special strength and contributions of each individual. Focus on your work, valuing its quality rather than its popularity. This approach is true economy, and if understood correctly, it embodies the essence of economy. Wastefulness isn’t about losing years of time or large sums of money—it’s about spending them away from your path. The real issue that leads to the downfall of individuals and societies is taking on unrelated tasks—straying from your main purpose to take on random assignments. Nothing is beneath you if it aligns with your life’s direction; nothing is truly valuable if it diverts you from that path. I believe we can draw a clear conclusion: society can never thrive and will always be in decline until everyone does what they were meant to do.

Spend for your expense, and retrench the expense which is not yours. Allston, the painter, was wont to say, that he built a plain house, and filled it with plain furniture, because he would hold out no bribe to any to visit him, who had not similar tastes to his own. We are sympathetic, and, like children, want everything we see. But it is a large stride to independence,—when a man, in the discovery of his proper talent, has sunk the necessity for false expenses. As the betrothed maiden, by one secure affection, is relieved from a system of slaveries,—the daily inculcated necessity of pleasing all,—so the man who has found what he can do, can spend on that, and leave all other spending. Montaigne said, "When he was a younger brother, he went brave in dress and equipage, but afterward his chateau and farms might answer for him." Let a man who belongs to the class of nobles, those, namely, who have found out that they can do something, relieve himself of all vague squandering on objects not his. Let the realist not mind appearances. Let him delegate to others the costly courtesies and decorations of social life. The virtues are economists, but some of the vices are also. Thus, next to humility, I have noticed that pride is a pretty good husband. A good pride is, as I reckon it, worth from five hundred to fifteen hundred a year. Pride is handsome, economical: pride eradicates so many vices, letting none subsist but itself, that it seems as if it were a great gain to exchange vanity for pride. Pride can go without domestics, without fine clothes, can live in a house with two rooms, can eat potato, purslain, beans, lyed corn, can work on the soil, can travel afoot, can talk with poor men, or sit silent well-contented in fine saloons. But vanity costs money, labor, horses, men, women, health, and peace, and is still nothing at last, a long way leading nowhere.—Only one drawback; proud people are intolerably selfish, and the vain are gentle and giving.

Spend according to your budget, and cut back on expenses that aren’t yours. Allston, the painter, used to say that he built a simple house and filled it with basic furniture because he didn’t want to attract visitors who didn’t share his tastes. We are emotional and, like kids, want everything we see. But achieving independence is a big leap—when a person discovers their true talent, they let go of the need for unnecessary expenses. Just like a betrothed woman is freed from the pressure of pleasing everyone by one secure relationship, a man who knows what he can do, can invest in that and stop all other spending. Montaigne remarked that when he was a younger brother, he dressed boldly and lived lavishly, but later, his estate and farms could support him. Let a man who belongs to the noble class—those who have discovered that they can actually do something—remove themselves from vague spending on things that aren't their own. Let the realist not worry about appearances. Let him leave the costly niceties and frills of social life to others. The virtues are frugal, but some vices are too. Next to humility, I’ve found that pride is a pretty good steward. I think a healthy pride is worth between five hundred to fifteen hundred a year. Pride is appealing and economical: it eliminates many vices, leaving only itself behind, making it seem like a significant gain to trade vanity for pride. Pride can live without servants, stylish clothing, can thrive in a two-room house, can eat potatoes, purslane, beans, and hominy, can farm the land, can walk instead of travel by car, can converse with poor people, or sit quietly satisfied in elegant salons. But vanity costs money, time, horses, people, and well-being, and ultimately leads nowhere. There’s just one downside: proud people can be incredibly selfish, while the vain tend to be kind and generous.

Art is a jealous mistress, and, if a man have a genius for painting, poetry, music, architecture, or philosophy, he makes a bad husband, and an ill provider, and should be wise in season, and not fetter himself with duties which will embitter his days, and spoil him for his proper work. We had in this region, twenty years ago, among our educated men, a sort of Arcadian fanaticism, a passionate desire to go upon the land, and unite farming to intellectual pursuits. Many effected their purpose, and made the experiment, and some became downright ploughmen; but all were cured of their faith that scholarship and practical farming, (I mean, with one's own hands,) could be united.

Art is a jealous mistress, and if someone has a talent for painting, poetry, music, architecture, or philosophy, they're not likely to be a good partner or provider. They should be smart about it and avoid taking on responsibilities that will make their life miserable and hinder their true work. Twenty years ago in this area, among our educated men, there was a kind of idealistic craze—a strong desire to go back to the land and combine farming with intellectual pursuits. Many achieved this goal and tried it out, and some even became full-time farmers; however, all of them realized that it’s impossible to blend scholarship with hands-on farming.

With brow bent, with firm intent, the pale scholar leaves his desk to draw a freer breath, and get a juster statement of his thought, in the garden-walk. He stoops to pull up a purslain, or a dock, that is choking the young corn, and finds there are two: close behind the last, is a third; he reaches out his hand to a fourth; behind that, are four thousand and one. He is heated and untuned, and, by and by, wakes up from his idiot dream of chickweed and red-root, to remember his morning thought, and to find, that, with his adamantine purposes, he has been duped by a dandelion. A garden is like those pernicious machineries we read of, every month, in the newspapers, which catch a man's coat-skirt or his hand, and draw in his arm, his leg, and his whole body to irresistible destruction. In an evil hour he pulled down his wall, and added a field to his homestead. No land is bad, but land is worse. If a man own land, the land owns him. Now let him leave home, if he dare. Every tree and graft, every hill of melons, row of corn, or quickset hedge, all he has done, and all he means to do, stand in his way, like duns, when he would go out of his gate. The devotion to these vines and trees he finds poisonous. Long free walks, a circuit of miles, free his brain, and serve his body. Long marches are no hardship to him. He believes he composes easily on the hills. But this pottering in a few square yards of garden is dispiriting and drivelling. The smell of the plants has drugged him, and robbed him of energy. He finds a catalepsy in his bones. He grows peevish and poor-spirited. The genius of reading and of gardening are antagonistic, like resinous and vitreous electricity. One is concentrative in sparks and shocks: the other is diffuse strength; so that each disqualifies its workman for the other's duties.

With his brow furrowed and determination set, the pale scholar steps away from his desk to take a breath of fresh air and gain a clearer understanding of his thoughts while strolling in the garden. He bends down to pull a purslane or dock that's suffocating the young corn, only to discover a second one nearby; reaching for a fourth, he soon finds there are four thousand and one. He becomes agitated and distracted, eventually snapping out of his foolish fixation on chickweed and red-root, only to realize that, despite his unwavering intentions, he's been fooled by a dandelion. A garden is like those harmful contraptions we read about every month in the news, which snatch at a man's coat or hand, dragging in his arm, leg, and eventually his whole body to certain doom. At an unfortunate moment, he tore down his wall and expanded his property. No land is inherently bad, but possessing land can make things worse. If a man owns land, he becomes enslaved by it. Now let him try to leave home, if he dares. Every tree, every vine, every melon patch, row of corn, or hedgerow stands in his way like persistent creditors when he wants to step out his gate. He finds his attachment to these plants toxic. Long, freeing walks—spanning miles—clear his mind and benefit his body. He finds long hikes easy. He believes he writes best on the hills. But this fiddling in a few square yards of garden feels dispiriting and trivial. The fragrance of the plants has dulled him, draining his vitality. He feels a heaviness in his bones. He becomes irritable and downcast. The skill of reading and gardening clash like different types of electricity; one creates sparks and shocks, while the other is a widespread force, meaning that each incapacitates the individual for the other's tasks.

An engraver whose hands must be of an exquisite delicacy of stroke, should not lay stone walls. Sir David Brewster gives exact instructions for microscopic observation:—"Lie down on your back, and hold the single lens and object over your eye," &c. &c. How much more the seeker of abstract truth, who needs periods of isolation, and rapt concentration, and almost a going out of the body to think!

An engraver, whose hands need to be incredibly delicate, shouldn't be building stone walls. Sir David Brewster provides precise instructions for microscopic observation: "Lie on your back and hold the single lens and object above your eye," etc. How much more does the seeker of abstract truth require periods of solitude, focused concentration, and almost a transcendent state to truly think!

2. Spend after your genius, and by system. Nature goes by rule, not by sallies and saltations. There must be system in the economies. Saving and unexpensiveness will not keep the most pathetic family from ruin, nor will bigger incomes make free spending safe. The secret of success lies never in the amount of money, but in the relation of income to outgo; as if, after expense has been fixed at a certain point, then new and steady rills of income, though never so small, being added, wealth begins. But in ordinary, as means increase, spending increases faster, so that, large incomes, in England and elsewhere, are found not to help matters;—the eating quality of debt does not relax its voracity. When the cholera is in the potato, what is the use of planting larger crops? In England, the richest country in the universe, I was assured by shrewd observers, that great lords and ladies had no more guineas to give away than other people; that liberality with money is as rare, and as immediately famous a virtue as it is here. Want is a growing giant whom the coat of Have was never large enough to cover. I remember in Warwickshire, to have been shown a fair manor, still in the same name as in Shakspeare's time. The rent-roll, I was told, is some fourteen thousand pounds a year: but, when the second son of the late proprietor was born, the father was perplexed how to provide for him. The eldest son must inherit the manor; what to do with this supernumerary? He was advised to breed him for the Church, and to settle him in the rectorship, which was in the gift of the family; which was done. It is a general rule in that country, that bigger incomes do not help anybody. It is commonly observed, that a sudden wealth, like a prize drawn in a lottery, or a large bequest to a poor family, does not permanently enrich. They have served no apprenticeship to wealth, and, with the rapid wealth, come rapid claims: which they do not know how to deny, and the treasure is quickly dissipated.

2. Spend according to your wealth, and with a plan. Nature operates by rules, not by whims and leaps. There must be a system in budgeting. Saving and being frugal won’t prevent even the most unfortunate family from going broke, nor will higher incomes make reckless spending safe. The key to success isn’t about how much money you have, but about the balance between income and expenses; once expenses are set at a specific level, even small and steady streams of income can lead to wealth. However, typically, as income increases, spending tends to rise even faster, so large incomes, in England and elsewhere, often don’t improve the situation; the appetite for debt doesn’t ease off. When there’s a problem with the crop, what good does it do to plant more? In England, the richest country in the world, I was told by insightful observers that wealthy lords and ladies have no more money to give away than anyone else; that generosity with money is as rare and quickly recognized as it is here. Need is a growing giant that the cloak of wealth was never big enough to cover. I recall being shown a lovely manor in Warwickshire, still under the same name as in Shakespeare's time. The annual rent was said to be about fourteen thousand pounds; however, when the second son of the last owner was born, the father was troubled about how to support him. The eldest son would inherit the manor; what to do with this extra child? He was advised to prepare him for a position in the Church, as a rector, which the family could arrange; and that’s what happened. In that country, it’s a general rule that larger incomes don’t really benefit anyone. It’s commonly noted that sudden wealth, like winning the lottery or receiving a large inheritance, doesn’t lead to lasting prosperity. They haven’t learned how to handle wealth, and along with the quick riches come quick demands: which they don’t know how to refuse, leading to rapid dispersal of the wealth.

A system must be in every economy, or the best single expedients are of no avail. A farm is a good thing, when it begins and ends with itself, and does not need a salary, or a shop, to eke it out. Thus, the cattle are a main link in the chain-ring. If the non-conformist or æsthetic farmer leaves out the cattle, and does not also leave out the want which the cattle must supply, he must fill the gap by begging or stealing. When men now alive were born, the farm yielded everything that was consumed on it. The farm yielded no money, and the farmer got on without. If he fell sick, his neighbors came in to his aid: each gave a day's work; or a half day; or lent his yoke of oxen, or his horse, and kept his work even: hoed his potatoes, mowed his hay, reaped his rye; well knowing that no man could afford to hire labor, without selling his land. In autumn, a farmer could sell an ox or a hog, and get a little money to pay taxes withal. Now, the farmer buys almost all he consumes,—tin-ware, cloth, sugar, tea, coffee, fish, coal, railroad-tickets, and newspapers.

Every economy needs a system; otherwise, even the best solutions won’t work. A farm is a good thing when it is self-sufficient and doesn’t rely on a salary or a store to survive. In this sense, livestock is a key part of the operation. If a non-traditional or artistic farmer neglects to include livestock, but still needs what they provide, they’ll have to fill that gap by begging or stealing. When people alive today were born, a farm could provide everything consumed on it. The farm generated no cash, and the farmer managed without it. If he got sick, neighbors would step in to help; each might offer a day's work, or half a day, or lend their oxen or horse to keep things running—hoeing potatoes, mowing hay, harvesting rye—knowing that no one could afford to hire labor without selling their land. In the fall, a farmer could sell an ox or a pig for a bit of cash to cover taxes. Now, farmers purchase almost everything they consume—cooking supplies, fabric, sugar, tea, coffee, fish, coal, train tickets, and newspapers.

A master in each art is required, because the practice is never with still or dead subjects, but they change in your hands. You think farm-buildings and broad acres a solid property: but its value is flowing like water. It requires as much watching as if you were decanting wine from a cask. The farmer knows what to do with it, stops every leak, turns all the streamlets to one reservoir, and decants wine: but a blunderhead comes out of Cornhill, tries his hand, and it all leaks away. So is it with granite streets, or timber townships, as with fruit or flowers. Nor is any investment so permanent, that it can be allowed to remain without incessant watching, as the history of each attempt to lock up an inheritance through two generations for an unborn inheritor may show.

A master in each field is necessary because practice is never with still or lifeless things; they change in your hands. You think that farm buildings and wide fields are solid assets, but their value flows like water. It needs as much attention as if you were pouring wine from a cask. The farmer knows how to handle it, fixes every leak, directs all the streams into one reservoir, and pours out wine; but a fool from Cornhill tries his hand, and it all slips away. So it is with granite streets or timber towns, just like with fruit or flowers. No investment is so permanent that it can be left without constant monitoring, as the history of each attempt to secure an inheritance for an unborn heir over two generations can show.

When Mr. Cockayne takes a cottage in the country, and will keep his cow, he thinks a cow is a creature that is fed on hay, and gives a pail of milk twice a day. But the cow that he buys gives milk for three months; then her bag dries up. What to do with a dry cow? who will buy her? Perhaps he bought also a yoke of oxen to do his work; but they get blown and lame. What to do with blown and lame oxen? The farmer fats his, after the spring-work is done, and kills them in the fall. But how can Cockayne, who has no pastures, and leaves his cottage daily in the cars, at business hours, be pothered with fatting and killing oxen? He plants trees; but there must be crops, to keep the trees in ploughed land. What shall be the crops? He will have nothing to do with trees, but will have grass. After a year or two, the grass must be turned up and ploughed: now what crops? Credulous Cockayne!

When Mr. Cockayne rents a cottage in the countryside and decides to keep a cow, he thinks a cow just eats hay and gives a pail of milk twice a day. But the cow he buys only produces milk for three months; after that, her udder dries up. What should he do with a dry cow? Who will buy her? Maybe he also bought a pair of oxen for his work, but they become bloated and lame. What should he do with bloated and lame oxen? A farmer would fatten his oxen after the spring work is done and then slaughter them in the fall. But how can Cockayne, who has no pastures and leaves his cottage every day by car during work hours, deal with fattening and killing oxen? He plants trees, but he needs crops to keep the land plowed for the trees. What should the crops be? He doesn’t want to deal with trees; he prefers grass. After a year or two, the grass must be turned over and plowed: now what crops? Naive Cockayne!

3. Help comes in the custom of the country, and the rule of Impera parendo. The rule is not to dictate, nor to insist on carrying out each of your schemes by ignorant wilfulness, but to learn practically the secret spoken from all nature, that things themselves refuse to be mismanaged, and will show to the watchful their own law. Nobody need stir hand or foot. The custom of the country will do it all. I know not how to build or to plant; neither how to buy wood, nor what to do with the house-lot, the field, or the wood-lot, when bought. Never fear: it is all settled how it shall be, long beforehand, in the custom of the country, whether to sand, or whether to clay it, when to plough, and how to dress, whether to grass, or to corn; and you cannot help or hinder it. Nature has her own best mode of doing each thing, and she has somewhere told it plainly, if we will keep our eyes and ears open. If not, she will not be slow in undeceiving us, when we prefer our own way to hers. How often we must remember the art of the surgeon, which, in replacing the broken bone, contents itself with releasing the parts from false position; they fly into place by the action of the muscles. On this art of nature all our arts rely.

3. Help comes from the customs of the land and the principle of Impera parendo. The principle is not to dictate or to stubbornly force your plans through ignorance, but to practically understand the secret expressed by nature: that things themselves refuse to be poorly managed and will reveal their own rules to the observant. There's no need for anyone to lift a finger. The local customs will handle everything. I don't know how to build or plant; I don’t know how to buy wood or what to do with the lot, the field, or the forest once purchased. Don't worry: it's all predetermined by the customs of the land, whether it’s sand or clay, when to plow, and how to cultivate, whether for grass or corn; and you cannot influence it either way. Nature has her own best way of doing everything, and she has clearly communicated it somewhere if we keep our eyes and ears open. Otherwise, she won't hesitate to set us straight when we choose our way over hers. We often need to remember the surgeon’s skill, which, in realigning a broken bone, focuses on correcting the false position; the parts naturally come together through the muscles' actions. All our skills depend on this natural talent.

Of the two eminent engineers in the recent construction of railways in England, Mr. Brunel went straight from terminus to terminus, through mountains, over streams, crossing highways, cutting ducal estates in two, and shooting through this man's cellar, and that man's attic window, and so arriving at his end, at great pleasure to geometers, but with cost to his company. Mr. Stephenson, on the contrary, believing that the river knows the way, followed his valley, as implicitly as our Western Railroad follows the Westfield River, and turned out to be the safest and cheapest engineer. We say the cows laid out Boston. Well, there are worse surveyors. Every pedestrian in our pastures has frequent occasion to thank the cows for cutting the best path through the thicket, and over the hills: and travellers and Indians know the value of a buffalo-trail, which is sure to be the easiest possible pass through the ridge.

Of the two prominent engineers involved in the recent construction of railways in England, Mr. Brunel went straight from station to station, through mountains, over rivers, crossing main roads, dividing estates in half, and going through this person's cellar and that person's attic window, arriving at his destination, pleasing mathematicians, but costing his company. Mr. Stephenson, on the other hand, believing that the river knows the way, carefully followed his valley, just like our Western Railroad follows the Westfield River, and turned out to be the safest and most cost-effective engineer. We say the cows laid out Boston. Well, there are worse navigators. Every walker in our pastures often has reason to thank the cows for finding the best path through the brush and over the hills: and travelers and Native Americans know the value of a buffalo trail, which is guaranteed to be the easiest path through the ridge.

When a citizen, fresh from Dock-square, or Milk-street, comes out and buys land in the country, his first thought is to a fine outlook from his windows: his library must command a western view: a sunset every day, bathing the shoulder of Blue Hills, Wachusett, and the peaks of Monadnoc and Uncanoonuc. What, thirty acres, and all this magnificence for fifteen hundred dollars! It would be cheap at fifty thousand. He proceeds at once, his eyes dim with tears of joy, to fix the spot for his corner-stone. But the man who is to level the ground, thinks it will take many hundred loads of gravel to fill the hollow to the road. The stonemason who should build the well thinks he shall have to dig forty feet: the baker doubts he shall never like to drive up to the door: the practical neighbor cavils at the position of the barn; and the citizen comes to know that his predecessor the farmer built the house in the right spot for the sun and wind, the spring, and water-drainage, and the convenience to the pasture, the garden, the field, and the road. So Dock-square yields the point, and things have their own way. Use has made the farmer wise, and the foolish citizen learns to take his counsel. From step to step he comes at last to surrender at discretion. The farmer affects to take his orders; but the citizen says, You may ask me as often as you will, and in what ingenious forms, for an opinion concerning the mode of building my wall, or sinking my well, or laying out my acre, but the ball will rebound to you. These are matters on which I neither know, nor need to know anything. These are questions which you and not I shall answer.

When a person, just out of Dock-square or Milk-street, goes and buys land in the countryside, their first thought is about having a great view from their windows. Their library should have a western view: they want to see sunsets every day, lighting up the Blue Hills, Wachusett, and the peaks of Monadnock and Uncanoonuc. What? Thirty acres and all this beauty for fifteen hundred dollars! It would be a steal at fifty thousand. They immediately start looking for the perfect spot to place their corner-stone, their eyes misty with happy tears. But the person who’s going to level the ground thinks it will take several hundred loads of gravel to fill the dip up to the road. The stone mason who should dig the well figures it will need to be forty feet deep; the baker isn't sure he’ll want to drive up to the door; and the practical neighbor criticizes the barn's location. The new owner soon realizes that the previous owner, the farmer, built the house in the perfect spot for sunlight, wind, the spring, drainage, as well as for easy access to the pasture, garden, field, and road. So Dock-square gives in, and things go their own way. Experience has made the farmer smart, and the clueless buyer learns to heed his advice. Step by step, they finally end up surrendering entirely. The farmer pretends to take orders, but the buyer says, "You can ask me as often as you want, in any creative way, for my opinion on how to build my wall, dig my well, or lay out my acre, but the ball is in your court. These are things I neither know nor need to know anything about. These are questions for you to answer, not me."

Not less, within doors, a system settles itself paramount and tyrannical over master and mistress, servant and child, cousin and acquaintance. 'Tis in vain that genius or virtue or energy of character strive and cry against it. This is fate. And 'tis very well that the poor husband reads in a book of a new way of living, and resolves to adopt it at home: let him go home and try it, if he dare.

Inside the house, a system takes control and becomes dominant and oppressive over everyone—husband and wife, servant and child, relative and friend. It's pointless for talent, goodness, or strong character to fight against it. This is just the way things are. And it’s all well and good for the poor husband to read about a new way of living and decide to bring it into his home: let him go home and give it a shot, if he’s brave enough.

4. Another point of economy is to look for seed of the same kind as you sow: and not to hope to buy one kind with another kind. Friendship buys friendship; justice, justice; military merit, military success. Good husbandry finds wife, children, and household. The good merchant large gains, ships, stocks, and money. The good poet fame, and literary credit; but not either, the ether. Yet there is commonly a confusion of expectations on these points. Hotspur lives for the moment; praises himself for it; and despises Furlong, that he does not. Hotspur, of course, is poor; and Furlong a good provider. The odd circumstance is, that Hotspur thinks it a superiority in himself, this improvidence, which ought to be rewarded with Furlong's lands.

4. Another way to be economical is to seek out the same type of seed you plant, and not expect to trade one type for another. Friendship grows from friendship; justice comes from justice; military achievement leads to military success. Good farming results in a wife, children, and a stable home. A good merchant reaps large profits, ships, investments, and money. A good poet earns fame and literary reputation; but not the other way around. Yet there’s often a mix-up in what people expect regarding these things. Hotspur lives for the moment, brags about it, and looks down on Furlong for not doing the same. Hotspur, of course, is poor, while Furlong is a good provider. The strange part is that Hotspur considers his recklessness a sign of superiority, believing it should be rewarded with Furlong's land.

I have not at all completed my design. But we must not leave the topic, without casting one glance into the interior recesses. It is a doctrine of philosophy, that man is a being of degrees; that there is nothing in the world, which is not repeated in his body; his body being a sort of miniature or summary of the world: then that there is nothing in his body, which is not repeated as in a celestial sphere in his mind: then, there is nothing in his brain, which is not repeated in a higher sphere, in his moral system.

I haven't fully finished my design yet. But we can't skip over the topic without taking a look inside. It's a philosophical idea that humans are made up of layers; that everything in the world can be found in our bodies, which are like a small version or summary of the world. This means that everything in our bodies has a counterpart in our minds, like how things exist in a celestial realm. Finally, everything in our brains has a reflection in a higher realm, which is our moral system.

5. Now these things are so in Nature. All things ascend, and the royal rule of economy is, that it should ascend also, or, whatever we do must always have a higher aim. Thus it is a maxim, that money is another kind of blood. Pecunia alter sanguis: or, the estate of a man is only a larger kind of body, and admits of regimen analogous to his bodily circulations. So there is no maxim of the merchant, e.g., "Best use of money is to pay debts;" "Every business by itself;" "Best time is present time;" "The right investment is in tools of your trade;" or the like, which does not admit of an extended sense. The counting-room maxims liberally expounded are laws of the Universe. The merchant's economy is a coarse symbol of the soul's economy. It is, to spend for power, and not for pleasure. It is to invest income; that is to say, to take up particulars into generals; days into integral eras,—literary, emotive, practical, of its life, and still to ascend in its investment. The merchant has but one rule, absorb and invest: he is to be capitalist: the scraps and filings must be gathered back into the crucible; the gas and smoke must be burned, and earnings must not go to increase expense, but to capital again. Well, the man must be capitalist. Will he spend his income, or will he invest? His body and every organ is under the same law. His body is a jar, in which the liquor of life is stored. Will he spend for pleasure? The way to ruin is short and facile. Will he not spend, but hoard for power? It passes through the sacred fermentations, by that law of Nature whereby everything climbs to higher platforms, and bodily vigor becomes mental and moral vigor. The bread he eats is first strength and animal spirits: it becomes, in higher laboratories, imagery and thought; and in still higher results, courage and endurance. This is the right compound interest; this is capital doubled, quadrupled, centupled; man raised to his highest power.

5. Now, these things are true in Nature. Everything rises, and the fundamental principle of economy is that it should also rise, or whatever we do must always aim higher. Therefore, it's a saying that money is another form of blood. Pecunia alter sanguis: a person's estate is just a larger kind of body and operates under rules similar to his bodily circulations. There’s no merchant maxim, like "The best use of money is to pay off debts," "Every business stands alone," "The best time is now," "The right investment is in tools for your trade," or similar sayings, that doesn’t qualify for a broader interpretation. The principles of the counting room, when thoroughly interpreted, are universal laws. A merchant's economy is a rough representation of the soul's economy. It’s about spending for power, not for pleasure. It’s about investing income; that is to say, taking specifics and forming them into generalities; turning days into complete eras—literary, emotional, practical—of one’s life, and continuing to elevate the investment. The merchant has just one rule, absorb and invest: he must be a capitalist. The scraps and leftovers must be collected back into the crucible; the gas and smoke must be burned off, and earnings shouldn't go to increasing expenses but back to capital. So, the person must be a capitalist. Will he spend his income, or will he invest? His body and every organ follow the same principle. His body is a container, where the essence of life is stored. Will he spend for pleasure? The path to ruin is quick and easy. Will he refrain from spending but hoard for power? It undergoes the sacred transformations, according to that law of Nature where everything ascends to higher levels, and physical strength turns into mental and moral strength. The bread he eats starts as strength and energy: it becomes, in higher processes, imagery and thought; and in even higher outcomes, courage and endurance. This is the true compound interest; this is capital multiplied—doubled, quadrupled, hundredfold; it’s humanity elevated to its highest potential.

The true thrift is always to spend on the higher plane; to invest and invest, with keener avarice, that he may spend in spiritual creation, and not in augmenting animal existence. Nor is the man enriched, in repeating the old experiments of animal sensation, nor unless through new powers and ascending pleasures, he knows himself by the actual experience of higher good, to be already on the way to the highest.

True thrift means spending on a higher level; to invest and invest, with greater desire, so that he can spend on spiritual creation rather than just on basic living. A person isn't truly enriched by repeating old experiences of physical sensation; instead, it's through discovering new abilities and uplifting pleasures that he understands himself through the actual experience of greater good, already on the path to the highest.

IV.

IV.

CULTURE

CULTURE

Can rules or tutors educate
The semigod whom we await?
He must be musical,
Tremulous, impressional,
Alive to gentle influence
Of landscape and of sky,
And tender to the spirit-touch
Of man's or maiden's eye:
But, to his native centre fast,
Shall into Future fuse the Past,
And the world's flowing fates in his own mould recast.
Can rules or teachers teach
The demigod we're waiting for?
He has to be musical,
Sensitive, impressionable,
Attuned to the gentle influence
Of the landscape and the sky,
And responsive to the spirit-touch
Of a man's or woman's gaze:
But, anchored in his true essence,
He will connect the Future with the Past,
And reshape the world’s shifting fates in his own way.

CULTURE.

Cultural Trends.

The word of ambition at the present day is Culture. Whilst all the world is in pursuit of power, and of wealth as a means of power, culture corrects the theory of success. A man is the prisoner of his power. A topical memory makes him an almanac; a talent for debate, a disputant; skill to get money makes him a miser, that is, a beggar. Culture reduces these inflammations by invoking the aid of other powers against the dominant talent, and by appealing to the rank of powers. It watches success. For performance, Nature has no mercy, and sacrifices the performer to get it done; makes a dropsy or a tympany of him. If she wants a thumb, she makes one at the cost of arms and legs, and any excess of power in one part is usually paid for at once by some defect in a contiguous part.

The current word for ambition is Culture. While everyone is chasing power and wealth as a means to that power, culture challenges the idea of success. A person is often trapped by their power. A sharp memory turns him into a walking encyclopedia; a talent for argument makes him just a debater; the ability to make money turns him into a miser, essentially, a beggar. Culture tempers these extremes by bringing in other strengths to counterbalance the dominant talent and by recognizing the different kinds of power. It keeps an eye on success. When it comes to performance, Nature doesn't hold back and sacrifices the performer to achieve results; it can lead to excessive swelling or complications. If she wants a thumb, she may create one at the expense of arms and legs, and any surplus of power in one area usually results in some deficiency in an adjacent area.

Our efficiency depends so much on our concentration, that Nature usually in the instances where a marked man is sent into the world, overloads him with bias, sacrificing his symmetry to his working power. It is said, no man can write but one book; and if a man have a defect, it is apt to leave its impression on all his performances. If she creates a policeman like Fouché, he is made up of suspicions and of plots to circumvent them. "The air," said Fouché, "is full of poniards." The physician Sanctorius spent his life in a pair of scales, weighing his food. Lord Coke valued Chaucer highly, because the Canon Yeman's Tale illustrates the statute Hen. V. Chap. 4, against alchemy. I saw a man who believed the principal mischiefs in the English state were derived from the devotion to musical concerts. A freemason, not long since, set out to explain to this country, that the principal cause of the success of General Washington, was, the aid he derived from the freemasons.

Our efficiency relies heavily on our focus, so Nature often burdens notable individuals with biases, sacrificing their balance for their effectiveness. It's said that no one can write more than one book; if someone has a flaw, it's likely to show in everything they create. If Nature produces a policeman like Fouché, he's filled with suspicions and schemes to outsmart them. "The air," Fouché said, "is full of daggers." The doctor Sanctorius spent his life on a scale, weighing his food. Lord Coke highly valued Chaucer because the Canon Yeoman's Tale illustrates the statute Hen. V. Chap. 4, against alchemy. I once met a man who believed the main problems in the English state stemmed from a dedication to musical concerts. Recently, a freemason aimed to explain to this country that the primary reason for General Washington's success was the support he received from the freemasons.

But worse than the harping on one string, Nature has secured individualism, by giving the private person a high conceit of his weight in the system. The pest of society is egotists. There are dull and bright, sacred and profane, coarse and fine egotists. 'Tis a disease that, like influenza, falls on all constitutions. In the distemper known to physicians as chorea, the patient sometimes turns round, and continues to spin slowly on one spot. Is egotism a metaphysical varioloid of this malady? The man runs round a ring formed by his own talent, falls into an admiration of it, and loses relation to the world. It is a tendency in all minds. One of its annoying forms, is a craving for sympathy. The sufferers parade their miseries, tear the lint from their bruises, reveal their indictable crimes, that you may pity them. They like sickness, because physical pain will extort some show of interest from the bystanders, as we have seen children, who, finding themselves of no account when grown people come in, will cough till they choke, to draw attention.

But worse than fixating on one thing, Nature has ensured individualism by giving each person a high opinion of their importance in the grand scheme. Egotists are the bane of society. There are dull and sharp, sacred and profane, coarse and refined egotists. It’s a sickness that, like the flu, affects everyone. In a condition known to doctors as chorea, the patient sometimes turns around, slowly spinning in place. Is egotism a kind of metaphysical variant of this illness? The person runs in circles shaped by their own talent, becomes infatuated with it, and loses connection with the world. It's a tendency seen in all minds. One of its irritating aspects is a craving for sympathy. The sufferers display their troubles, pull off the bandages from their wounds, and reveal their shameful actions, hoping you'll pity them. They enjoy being sick because physical pain will elicit some interest from onlookers, just as we've seen children who, feeling ignored when adults arrive, will cough until they choke to get attention.

This distemper is the scourge of talent,—of artists, inventors, and philosophers. Eminent spiritualists shall have an incapacity of putting their act or word aloof from them, and seeing it bravely for the nothing it is. Beware of the man who says, "I am on the eve of a revelation." It is speedily punished, inasmuch as this habit invites men to humor it, and by treating the patient tenderly, to shut him up in a narrower selfism, and exclude him from the great world of God's cheerful fallible men and women. Let us rather be insulted, whilst we are insultable. Religious literature has eminent examples, and if we run over our private list of poets, critics, philanthropists, and philosophers, we shall find them infected with this dropsy and elephantiasis, which we ought to have tapped.

This affliction is the curse of talent—of artists, inventors, and thinkers. Notable spiritualists struggle to distance their actions or words from themselves and to see them clearly for what they truly are. Watch out for the person who claims, "I'm on the verge of a revelation." This belief is quickly punished, as it encourages others to indulge it, treating the individual delicately and trapping them in a smaller, self-centered existence, isolating them from the larger world of God's joyful and imperfect people. It’s better to endure insults while we can still be insulted. Religious literature has many notable examples, and if we look through our personal list of poets, critics, philanthropists, and philosophers, we’ll find they’re afflicted with this bloating and swelling that we should’ve addressed.

This goitre of egotism is so frequent among notable persons, that we must infer some strong necessity in nature which it subserves; such as we see in the sexual attraction. The preservation of the species was a point of such necessity, that Nature has secured it at all hazards by immensely overloading the passion, at the risk of perpetual crime and order. So egotism has its root in the cardinal necessity by which each individual persists to be what he is.

This self-centeredness is so common among famous people that we have to assume there's a strong need in nature that it fulfills, similar to sexual attraction. The survival of the species is such a crucial need that nature ensures it, even at great risk, by intensifying passion, despite the potential for ongoing chaos and wrongdoing. Similarly, self-centeredness is rooted in the essential need for each person to continue being who they are.

This individuality is not only not inconsistent with culture, but is the basis of it. Every valuable nature is there in its own right, and the student we speak to must have a motherwit invincible by his culture, which uses all books, arts, facilities, and elegancies of intercourse, but is never subdued and lost in them. He only is a well-made man who has a good determination. And the end of culture is not to destroy this, God forbid! but to train away all impediment and mixture, and leave nothing but pure power. Our student must have a style and determination, and be a master in his own specialty. But, having this, he must put it behind him. He must have a catholicity, a power to see with a free and disengaged look every object. Yet is this private interest and self so overcharged, that, if a man seeks a companion who can look at objects for their own sake, and without affection or self-reference, he will find the fewest who will give him that satisfaction; whilst most men are afflicted with a coldness, an incuriosity, as soon as any object does not connect with their self-love. Though they talk of the object before them, they are thinking of themselves, and their vanity is laying little traps for your admiration.

This individuality isn’t just compatible with culture; it’s actually its foundation. Every unique quality exists for its own sake, and the student we're talking about needs to have an undeniable common sense that isn't overshadowed by culture, which utilizes all books, arts, resources, and the nuances of social interaction but never gets overwhelmed or lost in them. Only someone with a strong sense of purpose is truly well-rounded. The goal of culture isn’t to destroy this—God forbid!—but to remove any obstacles and distractions, leaving only pure potential. Our student should have a unique style and determination, and be an expert in his field. However, once he achieves that, he must set it aside. He ought to have an open-mindedness, the ability to view every subject with a clear, unbiased perspective. Yet, this personal interest and ego can be so excessive that if someone looks for a companion who can appreciate things for their own value, without emotional ties or self-centeredness, they'll find very few who can provide that satisfaction; most people suffer from a sort of emotional detachment or lack of curiosity as soon as something doesn’t relate to their own self-interest. Even when they talk about the subject in front of them, they’re really focused on themselves, and their vanity tends to set little traps for your admiration.

But after a man has discovered that there are limits to the interest which his private history has for mankind, he still converses with his family, or a few companions,—perhaps with half a dozen personalities that are famous in his neighborhood. In Boston, the question of life is the names of some eight or ten men. Have you seen Mr. Allston, Doctor Channing, Mr. Adams, Mr. Webster, Mr. Greenough? Have you heard Everett, Garrison, Father Taylor, Theodore Parker? Have you talked with Messieurs Turbinewheel, Summitlevel, and Lacofrupees? Then you may as well die. In New York, the question is of some other eight, or ten, or twenty. Have you seen a few lawyers, merchants, and brokers,—two or three scholars, two or three capitalists, two or three editors of newspapers? New York is a sucked orange. All conversation is at an end, when we have discharged ourselves of a dozen personalities, domestic or imported, which make up our American existence. Nor do we expect anybody to be other than a faint copy of these heroes.

But after a person realizes that their personal history doesn't hold much interest for others, they still chat with family or a few friends—maybe with half a dozen notable figures in their area. In Boston, life revolves around the names of about eight or ten people. Have you met Mr. Allston, Doctor Channing, Mr. Adams, Mr. Webster, Mr. Greenough? Have you listened to Everett, Garrison, Father Taylor, Theodore Parker? Have you spoken with Messieurs Turbinewheel, Summitlevel, and Lacofrupees? If not, you might as well just give up. In New York, it's about a different eight, ten, or twenty people. Have you seen a few lawyers, merchants, and brokers—two or three scholars, two or three investors, two or three newspaper editors? New York is like a squeezed orange. Once we've mentioned a dozen familiar names, whether local or not, that define our American lives, conversation tends to stop. And we don’t expect anyone to be anything more than a pale imitation of these figures.

Life is very narrow. Bring any club or company of intelligent men together again after ten years, and if the presence of some penetrating and calming genius could dispose them to frankness, what a confession of insanities would come up! The "causes" to which we have sacrificed, Tariff or Democracy, Whigism or Abolition, Temperance or Socialism, would show like roots of bitterness and dragons of wrath: and our talents are as mischievous as if each had been seized upon by some bird of prey, which had whisked him away from fortune, from truth, from the dear society of the poets, some zeal, some bias, and only when he was, now gray and nerveless, was it relaxing its claws, and he awaking to sober perceptions.

Life is really limited. Bring any group of smart people together again after ten years, and if a wise and calming presence encouraged them to be honest, we’d hear some surprising confessions! The “causes” we’ve sacrificed for—whether it’s Tariff, Democracy, Whigism, Abolition, Temperance, or Socialism—would reveal themselves as sources of resentment and rage. Our abilities can feel as harmful as if they had been snatched away by some predator that took them far from success, truth, and the beloved company of poets, driven by some passion or bias, and only when they’re now old and weary does it finally release its grip, allowing them to wake up to reality.

Culture is the suggestion from certain best thoughts, that a man has a range of affinities, through which he can modulate the violence of any master-tones that have a droning preponderance in his scale, and succor him against himself. Culture redresses his balance, puts him among his equals and superiors, revives the delicious sense of sympathy, and warns him of the dangers of solitude and repulsion.

Culture is the idea that people have various connections, allowing them to adjust the overpowering influences in their lives and protect themselves from their own worst tendencies. Culture restores balance, places them among their peers and those they admire, rekindles the enjoyable feeling of empathy, and reminds them of the risks of isolation and rejection.

'Tis not a compliment but a disparagement to consult a man only on horses, or on steam, or on theatres, or on eating, or on books, and, whenever he appears, considerately to turn the conversation to the bantling he is known to fondle. In the Norse heaven of our forefathers, Thor's house had five hundred and forty floors; and man's house has five hundred and forty floors. His excellence is facility of adaptation and of transition through many related points, to wide contrasts and extremes. Culture kills his exaggeration, his conceit of his village or his city. We must leave our pets at home, when we go into the street, and meet men on broad grounds of good meaning and good sense. No performance is worth loss of geniality. 'Tis a cruel price we pay for certain fancy goods called fine arts and philosophy. In the Norse legend, Allfadir did not get a drink of Mimir's spring, (the fountain of wisdom,) until he left his eye in pledge. And here is a pedant that cannot unfold his wrinkles, nor conceal his wrath at interruption by the best, if their conversation do not fit his impertinency,—here is he to afflict us with his personalities. 'Tis incident to scholars, that each of them fancies he is pointedly odious in his community. Draw him out of this limbo of irritability. Cleanse with healthy blood his parchment skin. You restore to him his eyes which he left in pledge at Mimir's spring. If you are the victim of your doing, who cares what you do? We can spare your opera, your gazetteer, your chemic analysis, your history, your syllogisms. Your man of genius pays dear for his distinction. His head runs up into a spire, and instead of a healthy man, merry and wise, he is some mad dominie. Nature is reckless of the individual. When she has points to carry, she carries them. To wade in marshes and sea-margins is the destiny of certain birds, and they are so accurately made for this, that they are imprisoned in those places. Each animal out of its habitat would starve. To the physician, each man, each woman, is an amplification of one organ. A soldier, a locksmith, a bank-clerk, and a dancer could not exchange functions. And thus we are victims of adaptation.

It's not a compliment but an insult to only ask a person about horses, or cars, or theaters, or food, or books, and whenever they show up, to politely steer the conversation to the topic they seem to prefer. In the Norse heaven of our ancestors, Thor's house had five hundred and forty floors; similarly, man's house has five hundred and forty floors. His strength lies in his ability to adapt and shift smoothly through many related points to wide contrasts and extremes. Culture tempers his exaggeration and the arrogance of his village or city. We need to leave our personal interests at home when we go out into public and engage with others on the broad grounds of goodwill and common sense. No achievement is worth losing our friendliness over. It's a harsh price we pay for so-called fine arts and philosophy. In the Norse myth, Allfadir didn’t get a drink from Mimir's spring (the fountain of wisdom) until he sacrificed his eye as a pledge. And here we have a pedant who can’t let go of his bitterness or hide his annoyance at interruptions by the best, if their conversation doesn’t cater to his self-importance—he's here to burden us with his personal views. It’s typical of scholars that each believes they are particularly obnoxious in their community. Bring him out of this frustrating state. Revitalize his tired skin with fresh blood. You restore his vision which he sacrificed at Mimir's spring. If you are the victim of your own actions, who cares what you do? We can do without your opera, your newspaper, your chemical analysis, your history, your logic. Your genius pays a high price for its uniqueness. His mind reaches for the heights, and instead of being a healthy, joyful, and wise person, he ends up like some mad schoolmaster. Nature is indifferent to the individual. When she has goals to achieve, she achieves them. Some birds are meant to wade through marshes and along sea edges, and they are so perfectly suited for this that they are trapped in those environments. Each animal outside of its habitat would perish. To the doctor, each man and woman is just an extension of one organ. A soldier, a locksmith, a bank clerk, and a dancer couldn’t swap roles. And so we remain victims of adaptation.

The antidotes against this organic egotism, are, the range and variety of attractions, as gained by acquaintance with the world, with men of merit, with classes of society, with travel, with eminent persons, and with the high resources of philosophy, art, and religion: books, travel, society, solitude.

The antidotes to this self-centeredness are the diversity and range of experiences gained through getting to know the world, connecting with noteworthy people, engaging with different social groups, traveling, and interacting with influential individuals, as well as tapping into the rich resources of philosophy, art, and religion: books, travel, social interactions, and solitude.

The hardiest skeptic who has seen a horse broken, a pointer trained, or, who has visited a menagerie, or the exhibition of the Industrious Fleas, will not deny the validity of education. "A boy," says Plato, "is the most vicious of all wild beasts;" and, in the same spirit, the old English poet Gascoigne says, "a boy is better unborn than untaught." The city breeds one kind of speech and manners; the back-country a different style; the sea, another; the army, a fourth. We know that an army which can be confided in, may be formed by discipline; that, by systematic discipline all men may be made heroes: Marshal Lannes said to a French officer, "Know, Colonel, that none but a poltroon will boast that he never was afraid." A great part of courage is the courage of having done the thing before. And, in all human action, those faculties will be strong which are used. Robert Owen said, "Give me a tiger, and I will educate him." 'Tis inhuman to want faith in the power of education, since to meliorate, is the law of nature; and men are valued precisely as they exert onward or meliorating force. On the other hand, poltroonery is the acknowledging an inferiority to be incurable.

The toughest skeptic who has witnessed a horse being trained, a pointer being taught, or who has visited a zoo or the show of the Industrious Fleas won’t deny the power of education. "A boy," says Plato, "is the most vicious of all wild beasts;" and similarly, the old English poet Gascoigne remarks, "a boy is better unborn than untaught." The city creates one kind of speech and behavior; the countryside has another; the sea has its own; and the army, yet another. We know that a trustworthy army can be built through discipline; that with systematic training, anyone can become a hero: Marshal Lannes told a French officer, "Know, Colonel, that only a coward claims he has never been afraid." A big part of courage comes from having done something before. In all human activities, those abilities will be strong that are practiced. Robert Owen said, "Give me a tiger, and I will educate him." It’s inhumane to doubt the power of education since improvement is the law of nature; people are valued based on how they push for progress or improvement. Conversely, cowardice is admitting that inferiority is unchangeable.

Incapacity of melioration is the only mortal distemper. There are people who can never understand a trope, or any second or expanded sense given to your words, or any humor; but remain literalists, after hearing the music, and poetry, and rhetoric, and wit, of seventy or eighty years. They are past the help of surgeon or clergy. But even these can understand pitchforks and the cry of fire! and I have noticed in some of this class a marked dislike of earthquakes.

Inability to improve is the only true tragedy in life. There are people who can never grasp a metaphor, or any deeper meaning behind your words, or any humor; they remain literalists even after experiencing the music, poetry, rhetoric, and wit of seventy or eighty years. They are beyond the help of doctors or the church. Yet even these individuals can understand pitchforks and the call for help! I've noticed in some of them a strong dislike for earthquakes.

Let us make our education brave and preventive. Politics is an after-work, a poor patching. We are always a little late. The evil is done, the law is passed, and we begin the up-hill agitation for repeal of that of which we ought to have prevented the enacting. We shall one day learn to supersede politics by education. What we call our root-and-branch reforms of slavery, war, gambling, intemperance, is only medicating the symptoms. We must begin higher up, namely, in Education.

Let’s make our education bold and proactive. Politics is just a reaction, a weak fix. We always seem to be a little late. The damage is done, the law is enacted, and we start the uphill struggle to repeal what we should have prevented in the first place. One day, we’ll learn to replace politics with education. What we refer to as our comprehensive reforms against slavery, war, gambling, and addiction is merely treating the symptoms. We need to start from a higher point—specifically, in Education.

Our arts and tools give to him who can handle them much the same advantage over the novice, as if you extended his life, ten, fifty, or a hundred years. And I think it the part of good sense to provide every fine soul with such culture, that it shall not, at thirty or forty years, have to say, "This which I might do is made hopeless through my want of weapons."

Our skills and tools give those who know how to use them a big advantage over beginners, almost like giving them an extra ten, fifty, or a hundred years of experience. I believe it's smart to equip every talented person with the education they need so that by the time they reach thirty or forty, they don't have to say, "What I could achieve is impossible because I lack the right tools."

But it is conceded that much of our training fails of effect; that all success is hazardous and rare; that a large part of our cost and pains is thrown away. Nature takes the matter into her own hands, and, though we must not omit any jot of our system, we can seldom be sure that it has availed much, or, that as much good would not have accrued from a different system.

But it's acknowledged that a lot of our training doesn’t really work; that success is often uncertain and hard to come by; that much of our effort and resources seem wasted. Nature handles things in her own way, and while we shouldn’t skip any part of our process, we can rarely be certain that it’s been very effective, or that a different approach wouldn’t have been just as beneficial.

Books, as containing the finest records of human wit, must always enter into our notion of culture. The best heads that ever existed, Pericles, Plato, Julius Cæsar, Shakspeare, Goethe, Milton, were well-read, universally educated men, and quite too wise to undervalue letters. Their opinion has weight, because they had means of knowing the opposite opinion. We look that a great man should be a good reader, or, in proportion to the spontaneous power should be the assimilating power. Good criticism is very rare, and always precious. I am always happy to meet persons who perceive the transcendent superiority of Shakspeare over all other writers. I like people who like Plato. Because this love does not consist with self-conceit.

Books, as the best records of human thought, should always be part of our understanding of culture. The greatest minds that ever lived—Pericles, Plato, Julius Caesar, Shakespeare, Goethe, Milton—were well-read, educated individuals who recognized the value of literature. Their views matter because they understood the opposing perspective. We expect a great person to be a good reader, or at least to have a sense of understanding that matches their natural talent. Good criticism is rare and always valuable. I'm always pleased to meet people who recognize Shakespeare's unmatched brilliance compared to other writers. I appreciate those who admire Plato because this appreciation doesn't come with arrogance.

But books are good only as far as a boy is ready for them. He sometimes gets ready very slowly. You send your child to the schoolmaster, but 'tis the schoolboys who educate him. You send him to the Latin class, but much of his tuition comes, on his way to school, from the shop-windows. You like the strict rules and the long terms; and he finds his best leading in a by-way of his own, and refuses any companions but of his choosing. He hates the grammar and Gradus, and loves guns, fishing-rods, horses, and boats. Well, the boy is right; and you are not fit to direct his bringing up, if your theory leaves out his gymnastic training. Archery, cricket, gun and fishing-rod, horse and boat, are all educators, liberalizers; and so are dancing, dress, and the street-talk; and,—provided only the boy has resources, and is of a noble and ingenuous strain,—these will not serve him less than the books. He learns chess, whist, dancing, and theatricals. The father observes that another boy has learned algebra and geometry in the same time. But the first boy has acquired much more than these poor games along with them. He is infatuated for weeks with whist and chess; but presently will find out, as you did, that when he rises from the game too long played, he is vacant and forlorn, and despises himself. Thenceforward it takes place with other things, and has its due weight in his experience. These minor skills and accomplishments, for example, dancing, are tickets of admission to the dress-circle of mankind, and the being master of them enables the youth to judge intelligently of much, on which, otherwise, he would give a pedantic squint. Landor said, "I have suffered more from my bad dancing, than from all the misfortunes and miseries of my life put together." Provided always the boy is teachable, (for we are not proposing to make a statue out of punk,) football, cricket, archery, swimming, skating, climbing, fencing, riding, are lessons in the art of power, which it is his main business to learn;—riding, specially, of which Lord Herbert of Cherbury said, "a good rider on a good horse is as much above himself and others as the world can make him." Besides, the gun, fishing-rod, boat, and horse, constitute, among all who use them, secret freemasonries. They are as if they belonged to one club.

But books are only useful if a boy is ready for them. Sometimes he gets ready very slowly. You send your child to the teacher, but it's the other boys who really educate him. You send him to Latin class, but much of his learning happens on the way to school from the shop windows. You appreciate the strict rules and long terms; he finds his best guidance in a side street of his own and chooses his own friends. He hates grammar and Gradus, but loves guns, fishing rods, horses, and boats. Well, the boy is right, and you’re not fit to raise him if your theory ignores his physical development. Archery, cricket, guns and fishing rods, horses and boats are all educators and liberators; so are dancing, fashion, and street talk; and — as long as the boy has potential and comes from a noble and genuine background — these will benefit him just as much as books. He learns chess, whist, dancing, and drama. The father notices that another boy has learned algebra and geometry in the same time. But the first boy has gained much more than these trivial games along with them. He becomes obsessed with whist and chess for weeks; but eventually, just like you did, he'll realize that after spending too long on the game, he feels empty and down on himself. From then on, this happens with other things, and it weighs on his experiences. These minor skills and accomplishments, like dancing, are tickets to the social circle of the world, and mastering them allows a young man to assess many things intelligently, instead of giving them a pretentious glare. Landor said, "I've suffered more from my bad dancing than from all the misfortunes and miseries of my life combined." As long as the boy is willing to learn (we're not trying to turn him into a statue made of wood), football, cricket, archery, swimming, skating, climbing, fencing, and riding are lessons in the art of strength, which is his main responsibility to understand; especially riding, of which Lord Herbert of Cherbury said, "a good rider on a good horse is as much above himself and others as the world can make him." Plus, the gun, fishing rod, boat, and horse create a special bond among all who use them; it’s like they belong to one exclusive club.

There is also a negative value in these arts. Their chief use to the youth, is, not amusement, but to be known for what they are, and not to remain to him occasions of heart-burn. We are full of superstitions. Each class fixes its eyes on the advantages it has not; the refined, on rude strength; the democrat, on birth and breeding. One of the benefits of a college education is, to show the boy its little avail. I knew a leading man in a leading city, who, having set his heart on an education at the university, and missed it, could never quite feel himself the equal of his own brothers who had gone thither. His easy superiority to multitudes of professional men could never quite countervail to him this imaginary defect. Balls, riding, wine-parties, and billiards, pass to a poor boy for something fine and romantic, which they are not; and a free admission to them on an equal footing, if it were possible, only once or twice, would be worth ten times its cost, by undeceiving him.

There’s also a downside to these arts. Their main benefit for young people isn’t entertainment, but rather to be recognized for what they truly are and to avoid feelings of resentment. We are full of superstitions. Each social class focuses on the advantages they lack; the elite envy raw strength, while the commoners envy status and upbringing. One of the benefits of a college education is revealing how little it actually matters. I knew a prominent person in a major city who was determined to get a university education but never did, and he could never fully see himself as equal to his brothers who went there. His obvious superiority over many professionals never quite made up for this imagined shortcoming. Parties, horseback riding, drinking, and billiards seem exciting and romantic to a young man, but they really aren’t; having access to them as an equal, even just once or twice, would be worth far more than the price, as it would help him realize the truth.

I am not much an advocate for travelling, and I observe that men run away to other countries, because they are not good in their own, and run back to their own, because they pass for nothing in the new places. For the most part, only the light characters travel. Who are you that have no task to keep you at home? I have been quoted as saying captious things about travel; but I mean to do justice. I think, there is a restlessness in our people, which argues want of character. All educated Americans, first or last, go to Europe;—perhaps, because it is their mental home, as the invalid habits of this country might suggest. An eminent teacher of girls said, "the idea of a girl's education, is, whatever qualifies them for going to Europe." Can we never extract this tape-worm of Europe from the brain of our countrymen? One sees very well what their fate must be. He that does not fill a place at home, cannot abroad. He only goes there to hide his insignificance in a larger crowd. You do not think you will find anything there which you have not seen at home? The stuff of all countries is just the same. Do you suppose, there is any country where they do not scald milkpans, and swaddle the infants, and burn the brushwood, and broil the fish? What is true anywhere is true everywhere. And let him go where he will, he can only find so much beauty or worth as he carries.

I'm not really a fan of traveling, and I notice that people often leave their home countries because they feel unremarkable there, only to return because they realize they don’t stand out in new places either. For the most part, it’s mainly the less serious folks who travel. Who are you to claim you have no responsibilities keeping you at home? I've been known to say some critical things about travel, but I want to be fair. I think there’s a restlessness in our society that reflects a lack of character. Almost all educated Americans eventually go to Europe—maybe because it feels like their true intellectual home, given the unhealthy habits of this country. A notable educator once said, “The ultimate goal of a girl’s education is to prepare them for going to Europe.” Can we ever rid ourselves of this obsession with Europe? It's obvious what their outcome will be. Someone who doesn’t make a mark at home won’t do so abroad. They go there just to blend into a bigger crowd. You really think you’ll discover something there that you haven’t already seen at home? The essence of all countries is the same. Do you really believe there’s any country where they don’t scrub milk pans, wrap up infants, burn brushwood, and grill fish? What’s true anywhere is true everywhere. And no matter where he goes, a person can only find as much beauty or value as he brings with him.

Of course, for some men, travel may be useful. Naturalists, discoverers, and sailors are born. Some men are made for couriers, exchangers, envoys, missionaries, bearers of despatches, as others are for farmers and working-men. And if the man is of a light and social turn, and Nature has aimed to make a legged and winged creature, framed for locomotion, we must follow her hint, and furnish him with that breeding which gives currency, as sedulously as with that which gives worth. But let us not be pedantic, but allow to travel its full effect. The boy grown up on the farm, which he has never left, is said in the country to have had no chance, and boys and men of that condition look upon work on a railroad, or drudgery in a city, as opportunity. Poor country boys of Vermont and Connecticut formerly owed what knowledge they had, to their peddling trips to the Southern States. California and the Pacific Coast is now the university of this class, as Virginia was in old times. 'To have some chance' is their word. And the phrase 'to know the world,' or to travel, is synonymous with all men's ideas of advantage and superiority. No doubt, to a man of sense, travel offers advantages. As many languages as he has, as many friends, as many arts and trades, so many times is he a man. A foreign country is a point of comparison, wherefrom to judge his own. One use of travel, is, to recommend the books and works of home; [we go to Europe to be Americanized;] and another, to find men. For, as Nature has put fruits apart in latitudes, a new fruit in every degree, so knowledge and fine moral quality she lodges in distant men. And thus, of the six or seven teachers whom each man wants among his contemporaries, it often happens, that one or two of them live on the other side of the world.

Of course, for some men, travel can be beneficial. Naturalists, explorers, and sailors are born for their roles. Some men are meant to be couriers, traders, diplomats, missionaries, or messengers, just as others are meant to be farmers and laborers. If a man is sociable and nature has designed him to be a creature that moves, we should take that cue and provide him with the upbringing that encourages social skills as diligently as we do for skills that add value. But let's avoid being overly serious and let travel have its full impact. The boy who has grown up on a farm and never left is often seen as having had no opportunities, and boys and men in that situation view jobs on a railroad or hard work in a city as chances to succeed. Poor rural boys from Vermont and Connecticut once gained the knowledge they had from their peddling trips to the Southern States. Today, California and the Pacific Coast serve as the university for this group, just as Virginia did in the past. "To have some chance" is their phrase. And the expression "to know the world," or to travel, is synonymous with everyone’s ideas of advantage and superiority. No doubt, for a sensible person, travel provides benefits. For every language he knows, he gains friends, skills, and trades—each time making him more complete. A foreign country serves as a benchmark to compare with his own. One benefit of travel is to appreciate the books and works made at home; [we go to Europe to become more Americanized;] and another is to meet people. Just as nature distributes fruits across latitudes, showcasing a new fruit in each region, she also distributes knowledge and moral qualities among distant people. Thus, out of the six or seven teachers each person needs among their peers, it's common for one or two to be located on the other side of the globe.

Moreover, there is in every constitution a certain solstice, when the stars stand still in our inward firmament, and when there is required some foreign force, some diversion or alterative to prevent stagnation. And, as a medical remedy, travel seems one of the best. Just as a man witnessing the admirable effect of ether to lull pain, and meditating on the contingencies of wounds, cancers, lockjaws, rejoices in Dr. Jackson's benign discovery, so a man who looks at Paris, at Naples, or at London, says, 'If I should be driven from my own home, here, at least, my thoughts can be consoled by the most prodigal amusement and occupation which the human race in ages could contrive and accumulate.'

Also, every constitution has its own tipping point, when everything feels stuck and needs some outside influence, a shift or change to avoid stagnation. Travel seems to be one of the best remedies for this. Just like someone who witnesses how effective ether is at easing pain and considers the possibilities of injuries, cancers, or lockjaw feels grateful for Dr. Jackson's helpful discovery, someone who looks at Paris, Naples, or London thinks, 'If I had to leave my own home, at least here, my mind can find comfort in the endless entertainment and activities that humanity has created and gathered over the ages.'

Akin to the benefit of foreign travel, the æsthetic value of railroads is to unite the advantages of town and country life, neither of which we can spare. A man should live in or near a large town, because, let his own genius be what it may, it will repel quite as much of agreeable and valuable talent as it draws, and, in a city, the total attraction of all the citizens is sure to conquer, first or last, every repulsion, and drag the most improbable hermit within its walls some day in the year. In town, he can find the swimming-school, the gymnasium, the dancing-master, the shooting-gallery, opera, theatre, and panorama; the chemist's shop, the museum of natural history; the gallery of fine arts; the national orators, in their turn; foreign travellers, the libraries, and his club. In the country, he can find solitude and reading, manly labor, cheap living, and his old shoes; moors for game, hills for geology, and groves for devotion. Aubrey writes, "I have heard Thomas Hobbes say, that, in the Earl of Devon's house, in Derbyshire, there was a good library and books enough for him, and his lordship stored the library with what books he thought fit to be bought. But the want of good conversation was a very great inconvenience, and, though he conceived he could order his thinking as well as another, yet he found a great defect. In the country, in long time, for want of good conversation, one's understanding and invention contract a moss on them, like an old paling in an orchard."

Similar to the benefits of traveling abroad, the aesthetic value of railroads is to combine the perks of city and rural life, both of which are essential. A person should live in or near a large city because, regardless of their own talent, they will repel just as much agreeable and valuable skills as they attract. In a city, the overall appeal of all the residents is bound to overcome every repulsion, ultimately drawing even the most unlikely hermit within its walls at some point during the year. In town, he can access swimming classes, gyms, dance lessons, shooting ranges, opera, theater, and exhibitions; the pharmacy, the natural history museum, the art gallery, national speakers, foreign travelers, libraries, and his club. In the countryside, he can enjoy solitude and reading, hard work, affordable living, and his old shoes; wild areas for hunting, hills for geology, and groves for reflection. Aubrey writes, "I have heard Thomas Hobbes say that, in the Earl of Devon’s house in Derbyshire, there was a good library with plenty of books for him, and his lordship supplied the library with the books he deemed necessary. However, the lack of good conversation was a significant disadvantage, and even though he believed he could manage his thoughts just as well as anyone else, he found a considerable shortcoming. In the countryside, over time, due to the lack of good conversation, one’s understanding and creativity become stagnant, like an old fence in an orchard."

Cities give us collision. 'Tis said, London and New York take the nonsense out of a man. A great part of our education is sympathetic and social. Boys and girls who have been brought up with well-informed and superior people, show in their manners an inestimable grace. Fuller says, that "William, Earl of Nassau, won a subject from the King of Spain, every time he put off his hat." You cannot have one well-bred man, without a whole society of such. They keep each other up to any high point. Especially women;—it requires a great many cultivated women,—saloons of bright, elegant, reading women, accustomed to ease and refinement, to spectacles, pictures, sculpture, poetry, and to elegant society, in order that you should have one Madame de Staël. The head of a commercial house, or a leading lawyer or politician is brought into daily contact with troops of men from all parts of the country, and those too the driving-wheels, the business men of each section, and one can hardly suggest for an apprehensive man a more searching culture. Besides, we must remember the high social possibilities of a million of men. The best bribe which London offers to-day to the imagination, is, that, in such a vast variety of people and conditions, one can believe there is room for persons of romantic character to exist, and that the poet, the mystic, and the hero may hope to confront their counterparts.

Cities create collisions. They say that London and New York strip away the nonsense from a person. A significant part of our education is about empathy and social interaction. Boys and girls raised among knowledgeable and refined individuals exhibit an invaluable grace in their manners. Fuller mentions that "William, Earl of Nassau, won a subject from the King of Spain every time he took off his hat." You can't have one well-bred person without an entire society of them. They elevate each other to high standards. This is especially true for women; it takes many cultured women—gatherings of bright, elegant, educated women used to comfort and refinement, to art, literature, and high society—to produce even one Madame de Staël. The head of a business, a prominent lawyer, or a leading politician interacts daily with groups of men from across the country. These are the driving forces, the business leaders of each region, and it's hard to think of a more thorough training for someone who is sensitive. Furthermore, we must consider the immense social potential of a million men. The greatest allure that London presents today is that, amidst such a vast diversity of people and circumstances, one can believe there is space for individuals of romantic character to thrive, and that poets, mystics, and heroes can hope to meet their counterparts.

I wish cities could teach their best lesson,—of quiet manners. It is the foible especially of American youth,—pretension. The mark of the man of the world is absence of pretension. He does not make a speech; he takes a low business-tone, avoids all brag, is nobody, dresses plainly, promises not at all, performs much, speaks in monosyllables, hugs his fact. He calls his employment by its lowest name, and so takes from evil tongues their sharpest weapon. His conversation clings to the weather and the news, yet he allows himself to be surprised into thought, and the unlocking of his learning and philosophy. How the imagination is piqued by anecdotes of some great man passing incognito, as a king in gray clothes,—of Napoleon affecting a plain suit at his glittering levee; of Burns, or Scott, or Beethoven, or Wellington, or Goethe, or any container of transcendent power, passing for nobody; of Epaminondas, "who never says anything, but will listen eternally;" of Goethe, who preferred trifling subjects and common expressions in intercourse with strangers, worse rather than better clothes, and to appear a little more capricious than he was. There are advantages in the old hat and box-coat. I have heard, that, throughout this country, a certain respect is paid to good broadcloth; but dress makes a little restraint: men will not commit themselves. But the box-coat is like wine; it unlocks the tongue, and men say what they think. An old poet says,

I wish cities could teach their best lesson—how to be calm and polite. It’s a common flaw among American youth—pretentiousness. The sign of a worldly person is their lack of pretension. They don’t make a big speech; they speak in a simple, businesslike way, avoid bragging, are humble, dress plainly, don’t make promises, do a lot, and speak in short answers while sticking to the facts. They refer to their job by its most basic title, taking away the sharpest tool from gossipers. Their conversations usually revolve around the weather and current events, but they allow themselves to be drawn into deeper thoughts and share their insights and knowledge. It’s fascinating how stories about great people going incognito—like a king in ordinary clothes—ignite the imagination, whether it's Napoleon adopting a simple outfit at his lavish gatherings, or great figures like Burns, Scott, Beethoven, Wellington, or Goethe blending in unnoticed; or Epaminondas, "who never speaks but will listen forever;" or Goethe, who enjoyed light topics and simple language with strangers, choosing worse rather than better clothing, and appearing a bit more whimsical than he truly was. There are benefits to wearing an old hat and a box coat. I’ve heard that across this country, people respect good wool suits, but formal attire can be a bit constraining: men hesitate to speak freely. But the box coat is like wine; it loosens the tongue, and people voice their true thoughts. An old poet says,

"Go far and go sparing,
For you'll find it certain,
The poorer and the baser you appear,
The more you'll look through still."2
"Go far and travel wisely,
Because it’s clear,
The more humble and lowly you seem,
The better you’ll see."__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
[2]

Beaumont and Fletcher: The Tamer Tamed.

Beaumont and Fletcher: *The Tamer Tamed*.

Not much otherwise Milnes writes, in the "Lay of the Humble,"

Not much else, Milnes writes in "The Lay of the Humble,"

"To me men are for what they are,
They wear no masks with me."
 
"To me, men are just who they are,
They don't hide behind masks with me."

'Tis odd that our people should have—not water on the brain,—but a little gas there. A shrewd foreigner said of the Americans, that, "whatever they say has a little the air of a speech." Yet one of the traits down in the books as distinguishing the Anglo-Saxon, is, a trick of self-disparagement. To be sure, in old, dense countries, among a million of good coats, a fine coat comes to be no distinction, and you find humorists. In an English party, a man with no marked manners or features, with a face like red dough, unexpectedly discloses wit, learning, a wide range of topics, and personal familiarity with good men in all parts of the world, until you think you have fallen upon some illustrious personage. Can it be that the American forest has refreshed some weeds of old Pictish barbarism just ready to die out,—the love of the scarlet feather, of beads, and tinsel? The Italians are fond of red clothes, peacock plumes, and embroidery; and I remember one rainy morning in the city of Palermo, the street was in a blaze with scarlet umbrellas. The English have a plain taste. The equipages of the grandees are plain. A gorgeous livery indicates new and awkward city wealth. Mr. Pitt, like Mr. Pym, thought the title of Mister good against any king in Europe. They have piqued themselves on governing the whole world in the poor, plain, dark Committee-room which the House of Commons sat in, before the fire.

It’s strange that our people should have—not water on the brain—but a bit of hot air there. A clever foreigner once said of Americans that “whatever they say has a bit of a speech-like quality.” Yet one characteristic noted about the Anglo-Saxon is a tendency for self-deprecation. In old, crowded countries, among a million fine jackets, a nice jacket isn’t anything special, so you find comedians. At an English gathering, a man with no standout manners or features, with a face like red dough, surprisingly reveals humor, knowledge, a broad range of topics, and personal connections with notable people from around the world, making you think you’ve encountered someone truly important. Could it be that the American wilderness has revived some remnants of old Pictish barbarism that were about to fade away—the love for scarlet feathers, beads, and shiny trinkets? Italians love bright clothes, peacock feathers, and embroidery; and I remember one rainy morning in Palermo, the streets were filled with bright red umbrellas. The English have a simple taste. The carriages of the wealthy are plain. A flashy uniform suggests new and clumsy city wealth. Mr. Pitt, like Mr. Pym, believed the title of Mister was enough to stand up against any king in Europe. They’ve taken pride in ruling the entire world from the modest, plain, dark Committee Room where the House of Commons met in front of the fire.

Whilst we want cities as the centres where the best things are found, cities degrade us by magnifying trifles. The countryman finds the town a chophouse, a barber's shop. He has lost the lines of grandeur of the horizon, hills and plains, and with them, sobriety and elevation. He has come among a supple, glib-tongued tribe, who live for show, servile to public opinion. Life is dragged down to a fracas of pitiful cares and disasters. You say the gods ought to respect a life whose objects are their own; but in cities they have betrayed you to a cloud of insignificant annoyances:

While we want cities to be places where the best things can be found, they often bring us down by blowing small issues out of proportion. The country person sees the city as just a busy restaurant and a barber shop. They've lost the majestic lines of the horizon, hills, and plains, along with their sense of seriousness and elevation. They've entered a world of smooth-talking people who live for appearances, submissive to public opinion. Life becomes a struggle filled with trivial worries and disasters. You might think the gods should value a life that centers around what matters most; however, in cities, they've sold you out to a sea of minor annoyances.

"Mirmidons, race féconde,
Mirmidons,
Enfin nous commandons;
Jupiter livre le monde
Aux mirmidons, aux mirmidons."3
 
'Tis heavy odds
Against the gods,
When they will match with myrmidons.
We spawning, spawning myrmidons,
Our turn to-day! we take command,
Jove gives the globe into the hand
Of myrmidons, of myrmidons.
 
"Mirmidons, fertile race,
Mirmidons,
Finally we command;
Jupiter gives the world
To the myrmidons, to the myrmidons."__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
It's tough odds
Against the gods,
When they go up against myrmidons.
We are spawning, spawning myrmidons,
Our time today! We take charge,
Jove hands the globe into the hands
Of myrmidons, of myrmidons.
[3]

Béranger.

Béranger.

What is odious but noise, and people who scream and bewail? people whose vane points always east, who live to dine, who send for the doctor, who coddle themselves, who toast their feet on the register, who intrigue to secure a padded chair, and a corner out of the draught. Suffer them once to begin the enumeration of their infirmities, and the sun will go down on the unfinished tale. Let these triflers put us out of conceit with petty comforts. To a man at work, the frost is but a color: the rain, the wind, he forgot them when he came in. Let us learn to live coarsely, dress plainly, and lie hard. The least habit of dominion over the palate has certain good effects not easily estimated. Neither will we be driven into a quiddling abstemiousness. 'Tis a superstition to insist on a special diet. All is made at last of the same chemical atoms.

What’s annoying is noise and people who yell and complain? People whose interest always points east, who live to eat, who call for the doctor, who pamper themselves, who warm their feet by the heat vent, and who scheme to get a cushy chair in a draft-free corner. If you let them start listing their ailments, the sun will set before they finish. Let these jokers make us lose our taste for trivial comforts. To a person working hard, the cold is just a color: the rain and wind are forgotten as soon as they come inside. Let’s learn to live simply, dress modestly, and sleep hard. Even a small amount of control over what we eat has benefits that are hard to quantify. We won't be pushed into an obsessive self-denial. It's a superstition to insist on a special diet. In the end, everything is made of the same chemical atoms.

A man in pursuit of greatness feels no little wants. How can you mind diet, bed, dress, or salutes or compliments, or the figure you make in company, or wealth, or even the bringing things to pass, when you think how paltry are the machinery and the workers? Wordsworth was praised to me, in Westmoreland, for having afforded to his country neighbors an example of a modest household where comfort and culture were secured, without display. And a tender boy who wears his rusty cap and outgrown coat, that he may secure the coveted place in college, and the right in the library, is educated to some purpose. There is a great deal of self-denial and manliness in poor and middle-class houses, in town and country, that has not got into literature, and never will, but that keeps the earth sweet; that saves on superfluities, and spends on essentials; that goes rusty, and educates the boy; that sells the horse, but builds the school; works early and late, takes two looms in the factory, three looms, six looms, but pays off the mortgage on the paternal farm, and then goes back cheerfully to work again.

A man chasing greatness has many desires. How can you worry about diet, sleep, clothes, or how people greet and compliment you, or the impression you make in social situations, or money, or even getting things done, when you realize how trivial the tools and the workers are? Wordsworth was praised to me in Westmoreland for setting an example for his rural neighbors of a simple home where comfort and culture were achieved without showiness. And a young boy who wears his worn cap and ill-fitting coat to secure a spot in college and access to the library is learning something valuable. There’s a lot of self-discipline and integrity in lower and middle-class homes, both in cities and in the countryside, that hasn’t made it into literature and probably never will, but it keeps the world beautiful; it cuts back on extras and invests in what matters; it goes without luxuries to educate the boy; it sells the horse, but builds the school; it works early and late, takes on multiple looms in the factory, but pays off the mortgage on the family farm, and then happily returns to work again.

We can ill spare the commanding social benefits of cities; they must be used; yet cautiously, and haughtily,—and will yield their best values to him who best can do without them. Keep the town for occasions, but the habits should be formed to retirement. Solitude, the safeguard of mediocrity, is to genius the stern friend, the cold, obscure shelter where moult the wings which will bear it farther than suns and stars. He who should inspire and lead his race must be defended from travelling with the souls of other men, from living, breathing, reading, and writing in the daily, time-worn yoke of their opinions. "In the morning,—solitude;" said Pythagoras; that Nature may speak to the imagination, as she does never in company, and that her favorite may make acquaintance with those divine strengths which disclose themselves to serious and abstracted thought. 'Tis very certain that Plato, Plotinus, Archimedes, Hermes, Newton, Milton, Wordsworth, did not live in a crowd, but descended into it from time to time as benefactors: and the wise instructor will press this point of securing to the young soul in the disposition of time and the arrangements of living, periods and habits of solitude. The high advantage of university-life is often the mere mechanical one, I may call it, of a separate chamber and fire,—which parents will allow the boy without hesitation at Cambridge, but do not think needful at home. We say solitude, to mark the character of the tone of thought; but if it can be shared between two or more than two, it is happier, and not less noble. "We four," wrote Neander to his sacred friends, "will enjoy at Halle the inward blessedness of a civitas Dei, whose foundations are forever friendship. The more I know you, the more I dissatisfy and must dissatisfy all my wonted companions. Their very presence stupefies me. The common understanding withdraws itself from the one centre of all existence."

We can hardly afford to ignore the powerful social benefits of cities; they need to be utilized, but carefully and with a sense of pride, and they will provide their greatest value to those who can manage without them. Use the city for special occasions, but develop habits that lean towards solitude. Solitude, which protects the average person, serves as a strict ally to genius, providing a cold, hidden space where wings can shed their old feathers and prepare to soar beyond suns and stars. Those who aim to inspire and guide their communities must be shielded from mingling with the thoughts of others, from living, breathing, reading, and writing under the constant, outdated weight of their opinions. "In the morning—solitude," said Pythagoras; so that nature can speak to the imagination in a way it never does in company, and that her favorite can connect with those divine forces that reveal themselves only through serious and focused contemplation. It's clear that Plato, Plotinus, Archimedes, Hermes, Newton, Milton, and Wordsworth did not live in crowded spaces; they emerged into the crowd occasionally as benefactors. A wise teacher will emphasize the importance of allowing young minds periods and habits of solitude in their daily lives. The main advantage of university life is often just the simple benefit of having a separate room and fire—a privilege parents will easily grant to their sons at Cambridge, but do not consider necessary at home. We refer to solitude to describe the nature of our thoughts; but if it can be shared among two or more, it becomes even more joyful and remains equally noble. "We four," Neander wrote to his close friends, "will enjoy the inner blessing of a civitas Dei, whose foundation is everlasting friendship. The more I get to know you, the more I find myself dissatisfied with my usual companions. Their very presence overwhelms me. The common understanding withdraws itself from the one center of all existence."

Solitude takes off the pressure of present importunities that more catholic and humane relations may appear. The saint and poet seek privacy to ends the most public and universal: and it is the secret of culture, to interest the man more in his public, than in his private quality. Here is a new poem, which elicits a good many comments in the journals, and in conversation. From these it is easy, at last, to eliminate the verdict which readers passed upon it; and that is, in the main, unfavorable. The poet, as a craftsman, is only interested in the praise accorded to him, and not in the censure, though it be just. And the poor little poet hearkens only to that, and rejects the censure, as proving incapacity in the critic. But the poet cultivated becomes a stockholder in both companies,—say Mr. Curfew,—in the Curfew stock, and in the humanity stock; and, in the last, exults as much in the demonstration of the unsoundness of Curfew, as his interest in the former gives him pleasure in the currency of Curfew. For, the depreciation of his Curfew stock only shows the immense values of the humanity stock. As soon as he sides with his critic against himself, with joy, he is a cultivated man.

Solitude relieves the pressure of immediate demands, allowing more compassionate and meaningful connections to emerge. The saint and the poet seek privacy for the most public and universal reasons; it's the key to culture: to engage a person more in their public role than in their private life. Here's a new poem that's sparked quite a few discussions in journals and conversations. From these, it's easy to figure out the overall verdict from readers, which is mostly negative. As a craftsman, the poet is only concerned with the praise he receives, not with the criticism, even if it's valid. The poor little poet only listens to the praise and dismisses the criticism as a reflection of the critic's shortcomings. However, the educated poet becomes invested in both realms—let's say Mr. Curfew—holding shares in the Curfew stock and in the humanity stock. In the latter, he takes just as much joy in proving the weakness of Curfew as he does in the appreciation he gets from the value of Curfew. The decline in his Curfew stock merely highlights the immense worth of humanity stock. The moment he sides with his critic against himself, joyfully, he becomes a cultivated individual.

We must have an intellectual quality in all property and in all action, or they are nought. I must have children, I must have events, I must have a social state and history, or my thinking and speaking want body or basis. But to give these accessories any value, I must know them as contingent and rather showy possessions, which pass for more to the people than to me. We see this abstraction in scholars, as a matter of course: but what a charm it adds when observed in practical men. Bonaparte, like Cæsar, was intellectual, and could look at every object for itself, without affection. Though an egotist à l'outrance, he could criticize a play, a building, a character, on universal grounds, and give a just opinion. A man known to us only as a celebrity in politics or in trade, gains largely in our esteem if we discover that he has some intellectual taste or skill; as when we learn of Lord Fairfax, the Long Parliament's general, his passion for antiquarian studies; or of the French regicide Carnot, his sublime genius in mathematics; or of a living banker, his success in poetry; or of a partisan journalist, his devotion to ornithology. So, if in travelling in the dreary wildernesses of Arkansas or Texas, we should observe on the next seat a man reading Horace, or Martial, or Calderon, we should wish to hug him. In callings that require roughest energy, soldiers, sea-captains, and civil engineers sometimes betray a fine insight, if only through a certain gentleness when off duty; a good-natured admission that there are illusions, and who shall say that he is not their sport? We only vary the phrase, not the doctrine, when we say, that culture opens the sense of beauty. A man is a beggar who only lives to the useful, and, however he may serve as a pin or rivet in the social machine, cannot be said to have arrived at self-possession. I suffer, every day, from the want of perception of beauty in people. They do not know the charm with which all moments and objects can be embellished, the charm of manners, of self-command, of benevolence. Repose and cheerfulness are the badge of the gentleman,—repose in energy. The Greek battle-pieces are calm; the heroes, in whatever violent actions engaged, retain a serene aspect; as we say of Niagara, that it falls without speed. A cheerful, intelligent face is the end of culture, and success enough. For it indicates the purpose of Nature and wisdom attained.

We need to have an intellectual quality in everything we own and do; otherwise, they mean nothing. I need to have children, experiences, a social environment, and history, or my thoughts and words lack substance. But to give these aspects any real value, I must regard them as temporary and somewhat superficial possessions, which appear to be more significant to others than to me. We naturally see this abstraction in scholars; but it's even more appealing when we notice it in practical people. Bonaparte, like Cæsar, was intellectual and could examine everything for what it is, without any personal attachment. Even though he was extremely self-centered, he could critique a play, a building, or a character on a universal level and provide a fair opinion. When we find that a person known only as a political or business celebrity has some intellectual interests or talents, our regard for them increases significantly; like when we learn about Lord Fairfax, the general of the Long Parliament, who had a passion for antiquarian studies; or about the French regicide Carnot, who had a remarkable genius for mathematics; or a contemporary banker who excels in poetry; or a political journalist with a deep interest in ornithology. So if we were traveling through the bleak wildernesses of Arkansas or Texas and saw someone next to us reading Horace, or Martial, or Calderón, we’d want to embrace him. In professions that require the toughest energy, like soldiers, sea captains, and civil engineers, you can sometimes catch a glimpse of fine insight, especially in their gentler moments off duty; a good-natured acknowledgment that there are illusions, and who is to say that they aren't part of that game? We’re basically saying the same thing when we claim that culture enhances our appreciation of beauty. A person who only lives for usefulness is like a beggar; no matter how they may function as a cog in the social machine, they can't be said to have truly found themselves. I feel the lack of appreciation for beauty in people every day. They’re unaware of how charm can enhance all moments and things, whether it's through manners, self-control, or kindness. Calmness and cheerfulness symbolize a true gentleman—calmness grounded in energy. The Greek battle scenes are tranquil; the heroes, despite being engaged in intense action, maintain a serene expression—much like how we describe Niagara Falls as cascading without haste. A cheerful, intelligent face represents the ultimate outcome of culture and is a significant achievement in itself, as it demonstrates the intent of Nature and the wisdom that has been gained.

When our higher faculties are in activity, we are domesticated, and awkwardness and discomfort give place to natural and agreeable movements. It is noticed, that the consideration of the great periods and spaces of astronomy induces a dignity of mind, and an indifference to death. The influence of fine scenery, the presence of mountains, appeases our irritations and elevates our friendships. Even a high dome, and the expansive interior of a cathedral, have a sensible effect on manners. I have heard that stiff people lose something of their awkwardness under high ceilings, and in spacious halls. I think, sculpture and painting have an effect to teach us manners, and abolish hurry.

When our higher faculties are engaged, we become more refined, and awkwardness and discomfort are replaced by natural and pleasant movements. It's been observed that thinking about the vastness of space and the grand timescales of astronomy instills a sense of dignity and a nonchalant attitude towards death. The beauty of nature, like mountains, calms our frustrations and strengthens our friendships. Even a tall dome and the wide space of a cathedral noticeably impact our behavior. I've heard that people who are usually stiff become less awkward under high ceilings and in large halls. I believe that sculpture and painting also help us learn manners and slow us down.

But, over all, culture must reinforce from higher influx the empirical skills of eloquence, or of politics, or of trade, and the useful arts. There is a certain loftiness of thought and power to marshal and adjust particulars, which can only come from an insight of their whole connection. The orator who has once seen things in their divine order, will never quite lose sight of this, and will come to affairs as from a higher ground, and, though he will say nothing of philosophy, he will have a certain mastery in dealing with them, and an incapableness of being dazzled or frighted, which will distinguish his handling from that of attorneys and factors. A man who stands on a good footing with the heads of parties at Washington, reads the rumors of the newspapers, and the guesses of provincial politicians, with a key to the right and wrong in each statement, and sees well enough where all this will end. Archimedes will look through your Connecticut machine, at a glance, and judge of its fitness. And much more, a wise man who knows not only what Plato, but what Saint John can show him, can easily raise the affair he deals with, to a certain majesty. Plato says, Pericles owed this elevation to the lessons of Anaxagoras. Burke descended from a higher sphere when he would influence human affairs. Franklin, Adams, Jefferson, Washington, stood on a fine humanity, before which the brawls of modern senates are but pot-house politics.

But overall, culture should strengthen the practical skills of speaking, politics, trade, and useful arts. There’s a certain depth of thought and ability to organize and adjust details that can only come from understanding their overall connection. The speaker who has seen things in their true order will never completely lose that perspective and will approach situations from a higher vantage point. Even though they might not talk about philosophy, they will have a unique mastery in dealing with issues and will be immune to being dazzled or frightened, setting them apart from lawyers and agents. A person who has a solid relationship with the leaders in Washington can read newspaper rumors and the speculations of local politicians with an understanding of what’s true and false in each statement and can clearly see where all this will lead. Archimedes could quickly examine your Connecticut machine and assess its suitability. More importantly, a wise person who understands not just what Plato teaches but also what Saint John reveals can elevate the matters they handle to a certain greatness. Plato claims that Pericles achieved this elevation through the teachings of Anaxagoras. Burke came from a higher realm when he aimed to influence human affairs. Franklin, Adams, Jefferson, and Washington operated on a principle of shared humanity that makes the squabbles of modern legislatures seem like petty politics.

But there are higher secrets of culture, which are not for the apprentices, but for proficients. These are lessons only for the brave. We must know our friends under ugly masks. The calamities are our friends. Ben Jonson specifies in his address to the Muse:—

But there are deeper secrets of culture that aren't meant for beginners, but for those who are skilled. These lessons are only for the courageous. We need to understand our friends even when they wear ugly masks. The hardships are our friends. Ben Jonson notes in his address to the Muse:—

"Get him the time's long grudge, the court's ill-will,
And, reconciled, keep him suspected still,
Make him lose all his friends, and, what is worse,
Almost all ways to any better course;
With me thou leav'st a better Muse than thee,
And which thou brought'st me, blessed Poverty."
"Get him the long-standing grudge, the court's animosity,
And, once reconciled, keep him still under suspicion,
Make him lose all his friends, and, worse yet,
Almost all chances for a better path;
With me, you leave a better Muse than you,
And what you brought me, blessed Poverty."

We wish to learn philosophy by rote, and play at heroism. But the wiser God says, Take the shame, the poverty, and the penal solitude, that belong to truth-speaking. Try the rough water as well as the smooth. Rough water can teach lessons worth knowing. When the state is unquiet, personal qualities are more than ever decisive. Fear not a revolution which will constrain you to live five years in one. Don't be so tender at making an enemy now and then. Be willing to go to Coventry sometimes, and let the populace bestow on you their coldest contempts. The finished man of the world must eat of every apple once. He must hold his hatreds also at arm's length, and not remember spite. He has neither friends nor enemies, but values men only as channels of power.

We want to learn philosophy by memorizing it and pretend to be heroes. But the wiser God says, Accept the shame, the poverty, and the isolation that come with speaking the truth. Experience the rough times as well as the good. Tough times can teach valuable lessons. When society is unsettled, personal qualities become even more important. Don't fear a revolution that forces you to live intensely for five years in one. Don't be too sensitive about making an enemy now and then. Be ready to be shunned occasionally, and allow the public to show you their coldest contempt. A well-rounded person must try every experience at least once. They need to keep their grudges at bay and not dwell on resentment. They have no true friends or enemies, but only see people as sources of influence.

He who aims high, must dread an easy home and popular manners. Heaven sometimes hedges a rare character about with ungainliness and odium, as the burr that protects the fruit. If there is any great and good thing in store for you, it will not come at the first or the second call, nor in the shape of fashion, ease, and city drawing-rooms. Popularity is for dolls. "Steep and craggy," said Porphyry, "is the path of the gods." Open your Marcus Antoninus. In the opinion of the ancients, he was the great man who scorned to shine, and who contested the frowns of fortune. They preferred the noble vessel too late for the tide, contending with winds and waves, dismantled and unrigged, to her companion borne into harbor with colors flying and guns firing. There is none of the social goods that may not be purchased too dear, and mere amiableness must not take rank with high aims and self-subsistency.

Those who aim high must be careful of seeking comfort and popularity. Sometimes, exceptional individuals are surrounded by awkwardness and criticism, much like a burr protecting its fruit. If something great and good is meant for you, it won’t come easily or quickly, and it certainly won’t arrive through trends, comfort, or social gatherings. Popularity is meant for shallow people. "The path of the gods is steep and rocky," said Porphyry. Open your Marcus Antoninus. The ancients saw him as the great person who didn't seek the spotlight and who faced the challenges of fate. They valued the noble ship that arrives too late for the tide, struggling against winds and waves, over its companion that sails into harbor with flags waving and cannons firing. There’s not a single social good that isn’t worth too much, and simple friendliness should never be compared to ambitious goals and self-sufficiency.

Bettine replies to Goethe's mother, who chides her disregard of dress,—"If I cannot do as I have a mind, in our poor Frankfort, I shall not carry things far." And the youth must rate at its true mark the inconceivable levity of local opinion. The longer we live, the more we must endure the elementary existence of men and women; and every brave heart must treat society as a child, and never allow it to dictate.

Bettine responds to Goethe's mother, who scolds her for not caring about her appearance, saying, "If I can’t dress how I want in our little Frankfurt, I won’t go too far." Young people need to recognize the absurdity of local opinions. The longer we live, the more we have to put up with the basic lives of men and women; every courageous person must treat society like a child and never let it control them.

"All that class of the severe and restrictive virtues," said Burke, "are almost too costly for humanity." Who wishes to be severe? Who wishes to resist the eminent and polite, in behalf of the poor, and low, and impolite? and who that dares do it, can keep his temper sweet, his frolic spirits? The high virtues are not debonair, but have their redress in being illustrious at last. What forests of laurel we bring, and the tears of mankind, to those who stood firm against the opinion of their contemporaries! The measure of a master is his success in bringing all men round to his opinion twenty years later.

"All those tough and restrictive virtues," said Burke, "are almost too expensive for humanity." Who wants to be tough? Who wants to stand up for the poor and the down-and-out against the elite and refined? And who, that dares to do so, can keep their cool and remain cheerful? The high virtues aren't easygoing, but they eventually find their redemption in being recognized. Just look at all the laurels and the tears of humanity for those who stood firm against the views of their time! A true master is measured by how many people come around to their way of thinking twenty years down the line.

Let me say here, that culture cannot begin too early. In talking with scholars, I observe that they lost on ruder companions those years of boyhood which alone could give imaginative literature a religious and infinite quality in their esteem. I find, too, that the chance for appreciation is much increased by being the son of an appreciator, and that these boys who now grow up are caught not only years too late, but two or three births too late, to make the best scholars of. And I think it a presentable motive to a scholar, that, as, in an old community, a well-born proprietor is usually found, after the first heats of youth, to be a careful husband, and to feel a habitual desire that the estate shall suffer no harm by his administration, but shall be delivered down to the next heir in as good condition as he received it;—so, a considerate man will reckon himself a subject of that secular melioration by which mankind is mollified, cured, and refined, and will shun every expenditure of his forces on pleasure or gain, which will jeopardize this social and secular accumulation.

Let me just say that culture can't start too early. Talking with scholars, I've noticed that they miss out on the rougher friends from their childhood who could have given imaginative literature a deeper and more infinite quality in their eyes. I also see that the opportunity to appreciate culture is greatly enhanced when you're the child of someone who appreciates it, and that the boys growing up now are not only years behind but also a couple of generations late to become the best scholars. I think it's a worthy motivation for a scholar that, similar to how a well-born owner in an old community typically evolves into a responsible steward, wanting to ensure the estate remains undamaged during their management and is passed on to the next heir in as good a condition as they received it—so too should a thoughtful person view themselves as part of the ongoing improvement of humanity, understanding that it helps soften, heal, and refine society, and will therefore avoid wasting their efforts on pleasure or profit that might jeopardize this social and secular progress.

The fossil strata show us that Nature began with rudimental forms, and rose to the more complex, as fast as the earth was fit for their dwelling-place; and that the lower perish, as the higher appear. Very few of our race can be said to be yet finished men. We still carry sticking to us some remains of the preceding inferior quadruped organization. We call these millions men; but they are not yet men. Half-engaged in the soil, pawing to get free, man needs all the music that can be brought to disengage him. If Love, red Love, with tears and joy; if Want with his scourge; if War with his cannonade; if Christianity with its charity; if Trade with its money; if Art with its portfolios; if Science with her telegraphs through the deeps of space and time; can set his dull nerves throbbing, and by loud taps on the tough chrysalis, can break its walls, and let the new creature emerge erect and free,—make way, and sing pæan! The age of the quadruped is to go out,—the age of the brain and of the heart is to come in. The time will come when the evil forms we have known can no more be organized. Man's culture can spare nothing, wants all the material. He is to convert all impediments into instruments, all enemies into power. The formidable mischief will only make the more useful slave. And if one shall read the future of the race hinted in the organic effort of Nature to mount and meliorate, and the corresponding impulse to the Better in the human being, we shall dare affirm that there is nothing he will not overcome and convert, until at last culture shall absorb the chaos and gehenna. He will convert the Furies into Muses, and the hells into benefit.

The fossil layers show us that Nature started with basic forms and evolved into more complex ones as the Earth became suitable for their habitats, and that the lower forms die out as the higher ones appear. Very few people in our society can be considered fully developed. We still carry remnants of the earlier, simpler animal structure. We call these millions human beings, but they are not fully human yet. Caught up in the muck, struggling to break free, humanity needs all the inspiration it can get to liberate itself. If Love, pure Love, with tears and joy; if Want with its whip; if War with its cannon fire; if Christianity with its compassion; if Trade with its wealth; if Art with its creations; if Science with its advances through the vastness of space and time; can get his dull nerves racing and break open the tough shell to allow the new being to emerge upright and free—let's clear the way and celebrate! The age of the animal is ending—the age of intellect and emotion is beginning. The time will come when the harmful forms we’ve known can no longer exist. Humanity’s development cannot afford to waste anything; it needs all the resources available. We are to transform all obstacles into tools, all adversaries into strengths. The serious harm will only make a more productive laborer. And if we look to the future of our species, hinted at in Nature’s organic effort to rise and improve, and the corresponding drive toward progress within humanity, we can safely say that there is nothing we won’t conquer and transform, until finally culture absorbs the chaos and torment. We will turn the Furies into Muses and the hells into something beneficial.

V.

V.

BEHAVIOR.

BEHAVIOR.

Grace, Beauty, and Caprice
Build this golden portal;
Graceful women, chosen men
Dazzle every mortal:
Their sweet and lofty countenance
His enchanting food;
He need not go to them, their forms
Beset his solitude.
He looketh seldom in their face,
His eyes explore the ground,
The green grass is a looking-glass
Whereon their traits are found.
Little he says to them,
So dances his heart in his breast,
Their tranquil mien bereaveth him
Of wit, of words, of rest.
Too weak to win, too fond to shun
The tyrants of his doom,
The much deceived Endymion
Slips behind a tomb.
Grace, Beauty, and Whimsy
Create this golden gateway;
Elegant women, chosen men
Enchant each soul:
Their sweet and noble expressions
His delightful food;
He doesn't need to approach them; their forms
Surround his solitude.
He rarely looks into their eyes,
His gaze is on the ground,
The green grass serves as a mirror
Where their features are found.
He says little to them,
Yet his heart dances in his chest,
Their serene demeanor leaves him
Without wit, words, or rest.
Too weak to win, too attached to escape
The rulers of his fate,
The deeply deceived Endymion
Slips behind a tomb.

BEHAVIOR.

BEHAVIOR.

The soul which animates Nature is not less significantly published in the figure, movement, and gesture of animated bodies, than in its last vehicle of articulate speech. This silent and subtile language is Manners; not what, but how. Life expresses. A statue has no tongue, and needs none. Good tableaux do not need declamation. Nature tells every secret once. Yes, but in man she tells it all the time, by form, attitude, gesture, mien, face, and parts of the face, and by the whole action of the machine. The visible carriage or action of the individual, as resulting from his organization and his will combined, we call manners. What are they but thought entering the hands and feet, controlling the movements of the body, the speech and behavior?

The soul that brings Nature to life is just as clearly expressed in the shape, movement, and gestures of living beings as it is in the final form of spoken language. This silent and subtle language is Manners; not what, but how. Life expresses itself. A statue has no voice, and it doesn’t need one. Good scenes don’t require speech. Nature reveals every secret only once. Yes, but in humans, she reveals it all the time, through form, posture, gesture, demeanor, facial expressions, and the entire action of the body. The visible manner or action of a person, resulting from their nature and will combined, we call manners. What are they but thoughts moving through the hands and feet, guiding the body's movements, speech, and behavior?

There is always a best way of doing everything, if it be to boil an egg. Manners are the happy ways of doing things; each once a stroke of genius or of love,—now repeated and hardened into usage. They form at last a rich varnish, with which the routine of life is washed, and its details adorned. If they are superficial, so are the dew-drops which give such a depth to the morning meadows. Manners are very communicable: men catch them from each other. Consuelo, in the romance, boasts of the lessons she had given the nobles in manners, on the stage; and, in real life, Talma taught Napoleon the arts of behavior. Genius invents fine manners, which the baron and the baroness copy very fast, and, by the advantage of a palace, better the instruction. They stereotype the lesson they have learned into a mode.

There's always a best way to do everything, even if it's just boiling an egg. Manners are the enjoyable ways of doing things; each once a spark of genius or love—now repeated and set into habit. They ultimately create a rich coating that brightens up the routine of life and enhances its details. If they seem superficial, so do the dew-drops that bring depth to morning meadows. Manners are contagious: people pick them up from one another. Consuelo, in the story, takes pride in the lessons she taught the nobles about manners on stage; and in real life, Talma taught Napoleon how to behave. Genius comes up with great manners, which the baron and the baroness quickly imitate, and, thanks to their palace, improve upon the teaching. They turn what they've learned into a standard way of doing things.

The power of manners is incessant,—an element as unconcealable as fire. The nobility cannot in any country be disguised, and no more in a republic or a democracy, than in a kingdom. No man can resist their influence. There are certain manners which are learned in good society, of that force, that, if a person have them, he or she must be considered, and is everywhere welcome, though without beauty, or wealth, or genius. Give a boy address and accomplishments, and you give him the mastery of palaces and fortunes where he goes. He has not the trouble of earning or owning them; they solicit him to enter and possess. We send girls of a timid, retreating disposition to the boarding-school, to the riding-school, to the ballroom, or wheresoever they can come into acquaintance and nearness of leading persons of their own sex; where they might learn address, and see it near at hand. The power of a woman of fashion to lead, and also to daunt and repel, derives from their belief that she knows resources and behaviors not known to them; but when these have mastered her secret, they learn to confront her, and recover their self-possession.

The power of manners is constant—an element as undeniable as fire. The nobility can’t be hidden in any country, whether in a republic, a democracy, or a kingdom. No one can resist their influence. There are certain manners learned in good society that are so powerful that if someone possesses them, they must be recognized and welcomed everywhere, even without beauty, wealth, or talent. Give a boy charm and skills, and you give him access to palaces and fortunes wherever he goes. He doesn’t have to earn or own them; they invite him in and offer him possession. We send girls who are shy or reserved to boarding schools, riding schools, ballrooms, or anywhere they can meet influential people of their own sex, where they can learn social skills and see them demonstrated. The power of a fashionable woman to lead, as well as to intimidate and push away, comes from the belief that she knows things and behaves in ways they do not; but once these women discover her secrets, they can stand up to her and regain their confidence.

Every day bears witness to their gentle rule. People who would obtrude, now do not obtrude. The mediocre circle learns to demand that which belongs to a high state of nature or of culture. Your manners are always under examination, and by committees little suspected,—a police in citizens' clothes,—but are awarding or denying you very high prizes when you least think of it.

Every day shows their gentle leadership. People who used to intrude no longer do. The average group learns to ask for what belongs to a higher level of nature or culture. Your behavior is always being judged, often by unexpected committees—civilians acting like a police force—but they are granting or denying you significant rewards when you least expect it.

We talk much of utilities,—but 'tis our manners that associate us. In hours of business, we go to him who knows, or has, or does this or that which we want, and we do not let our taste or feeling stand in the way. But this activity over, we return to the indolent state, and wish for those we can be at ease with: those who will go where we go, whose manners do not offend us, whose social tone chimes with ours. When we reflect on their persuasive and cheering force; how they recommend, prepare, and draw people together; how, in all clubs, manners make the members; how manners make the fortune of the ambitious youth; that, for the most part, his manners marry him, and, for the most part, he marries manners; when we think what keys they are, and to what secrets; what high lessons and inspiring tokens of character they convey; and what divination is required in us, for the reading of this fine telegraph, we see what range the subject has, and what relations to convenience, power, and beauty.

We talk a lot about utilities, but it's our manners that truly connect us. During work hours, we approach those who know, have, or can provide what we need without letting our personal preferences or feelings get in the way. Once the work is done, though, we go back to being lazy and long for the company of those we can relax with: people who will go where we go, whose manners don’t bother us, and whose social vibe matches ours. When we think about their charm and uplifting presence; how they connect and unite people; how, in every group, manners shape the members; how manners can build the future of an ambitious young person; that, most of the time, his manners lead him to marriage, and he often marries into good manners; when we consider the keys they hold and the secrets they unlock; what profound lessons and inspiring signs of character they convey; and what intuition is needed to understand this subtle communication, we realize how broad this topic is and how it relates to convenience, power, and beauty.

Their first service is very low,—when they are the minor morals: but 'tis the beginning of civility,—to make us, I mean, endurable to each other. We prize them for their rough-plastic, abstergent force; to get people out of the quadruped state; to get them washed, clothed, and set up on end; to slough their animal husks and habits; compel them to be clean; overawe their spite and meanness, teach them to stifle the base, and choose the generous expression, and make them know how much happier the generous behaviors are.

Their first service is quite minimal—when they are the basic morals—but it's the start of civility—to help us, I mean, tolerate each other. We appreciate them for their rough, cleansing power; to help people move out of their animalistic ways; to get them cleaned up, dressed, and standing tall; to shed their base instincts and habits; to force them to be clean; to intimidate their malice and pettiness, to teach them to suppress the unworthy, choose more generous expressions, and show them how much happier generous actions can make them.

Bad behavior the laws cannot reach. Society is infested with rude, cynical, restless, and frivolous persons who prey upon the rest, and whom, a public opinion concentrated into good manners, forms accepted by the sense of all, can reach:—the contradictors and railers at public and private tables, who are like terriers, who conceive it the duty of a dog of honor to growl at any passer-by, and do the honors of the house by barking him out of sight:—I have seen men who neigh like a horse when you contradict them, or say something which they do not understand:—then the overbold, who make their own invitation to your hearth; the persevering talker, who gives you his society in large, saturating doses; the pitiers of themselves,—a perilous class; the frivolous Asmodeus, who relies on you to find him in ropes of sand to twist; the monotones; in short, every stripe of absurdity;—these are social inflictions which the magistrate cannot cure or defend you from, and which must be intrusted to the restraining force of custom, and proverbs, and familiar rules of behavior impressed on young people in their school-days.

Bad behavior that the laws can’t touch. Society is filled with rude, cynical, restless, and shallow people who prey on others, and whom a public opinion focused on good manners, accepted by everyone, can reach:—the ones who argue and criticize at public and private gatherings, like terriers that think it’s their duty to growl at anyone who passes by and bark them out of sight:—I’ve seen men who bray like a horse when you disagree with them or say something they don’t get:—then there are the overly bold, who invite themselves into your space; the relentless talker, who inundates you with his company; the self-pitying—an alarming group; the frivolous Asmodeus, who depends on you to find him traps made of sand to manipulate; the monotones; in short, every kind of absurdity;—these are social annoyances that the law cannot fix or protect you from, and they must be left to the restraining power of customs, proverbs, and the familiar rules of conduct taught to young people in school.

In the hotels on the banks of the Mississippi, they print, or used to print, among the rules of the house, that "no gentleman can be permitted to come to the public table without his coat;" and in the same country, in the pews of the churches, little placards plead with the worshipper against the fury of expectoration. Charles Dickens self-sacrificingly undertook the reformation of our American manners in unspeakable particulars. I think the lesson was not quite lost; that it held bad manners up, so that the churls could see the deformity. Unhappily, the book had its own deformities. It ought not to need to print in a reading-room a caution to strangers not to speak loud; nor to persons who look over fine engravings, that they should be handled like cobwebs and butterflies' wings; nor to persons who look at marble statues, that they shall not smite them with canes. But, even in the perfect civilization of this city, such cautions are not quite needless in the Athenæum and City Library.

In the hotels along the Mississippi, they used to have a rule that said, "no gentleman can come to the public table without his coat;" and in the local churches, little signs ask worshippers to avoid spitting. Charles Dickens took it upon himself to reform our American manners in some pretty shocking ways. I think the lesson wasn’t entirely lost; it highlighted bad manners so that rude people could see how ugly they were. Unfortunately, the book had its own flaws. It shouldn't have to remind people in a reading room not to speak too loudly; nor tell people admiring fine engravings to handle them delicately like cobwebs and butterfly wings; nor warn those looking at marble statues not to hit them with canes. Yet, even in this city's high level of civilization, such reminders are still somewhat necessary in the Athenæum and City Library.

Manners are factitious, and grow out of circumstance as well as out of character. If you look at the pictures of patricians and of peasants, of different periods and countries, you will see how well they match the same classes in our towns. The modern aristocrat not only is well drawn in Titian's Venetian doges, and in Roman coins and statues, but also in the pictures which Commodore Perry brought home of dignitaries in Japan. Broad lands and great interests not only arrive to such heads as can manage them, but form manners of power. A keen eye, too, will see nice gradations of rank, or see in the manners the degree of homage the party is wont to receive. A prince who is accustomed every day to be courted and deferred to by the highest grandees, acquires a corresponding expectation, and a becoming mode of receiving and replying to this homage.

Manners are artificial and arise from both circumstances and character. If you look at portraits of aristocrats and peasants from different times and places, you’ll notice they reflect the same social classes in our towns today. The modern aristocrat can be seen not only in Titian's Venetian doges and Roman coins and statues but also in the images that Commodore Perry brought back of dignitaries in Japan. Wealthy lands and significant interests tend to gather around those who can manage them, shaping a style of power. A discerning observer will also notice subtle differences in rank or see how manners reflect the level of respect that a person typically receives. A prince who is used to being courted and respected by the highest nobles develops expectations to match that and learns the proper way to receive and respond to such respect.

There are always exceptional people and modes. English grandees affect to be farmers. Claverhouse is a fop, and, under the finish of dress, and levity of behavior, hides the terror of his war. But Nature and Destiny are honest, and never fail to leave their mark, to hang out a sign for each and for every quality. It is much to conquer one's face, and perhaps the ambitious youth thinks he has got the whole secret when he has learned, that disengaged manners are commanding. Don't be deceived by a facile exterior. Tender men sometimes have strong wills. We had, in Massachusetts, an old statesman, who had sat all his life in courts and in chairs of state, without overcoming an extreme irritability of face, voice, and bearing: when he spoke, his voice would not serve him; it cracked, it broke, it wheezed, it piped;—little cared he; he knew that it had got to pipe, or wheeze, or screech his argument and his indignation. When he sat down, after speaking, he seemed in a sort of fit, and held on to his chair with both hands: but underneath all this irritability, was a puissant will, firm, and advancing, and a memory in which lay in order and method like geologic strata every fact of his history, and under the control of his will.

There are always remarkable individuals and trends. English nobles pretend to be farmers. Claverhouse is a dandy, and beneath his stylish appearance and carefree behavior lies the fear of his warfare. But Nature and Fate are straightforward, and they always leave their mark, showing a sign for every talent and trait. It takes a lot to master one's expression, and maybe the ambitious young person thinks they've figured it all out when they learn that casual manners command attention. Don’t be fooled by a smooth exterior. Gentle people can sometimes have strong wills. We had an old statesman in Massachusetts who spent his whole life in courts and government but couldn't shake his extreme irritability in his face, voice, and demeanor: when he spoke, his voice would fail him; it cracked, broke, wheezed, and piped—he didn't care; he knew it had to pipe or wheeze or screech his argument and anger. When he finished speaking and sat down, he looked like he was having a fit, gripping his chair with both hands. But beneath that irritability was a powerful will, strong and forward-moving, and a memory that organized every fact of his history like geological layers, all under the control of his will.

Manners are partly factitious, but, mainly, there must be capacity for culture in the blood. Else all culture is vain. The obstinate prejudice in favor of blood, which lies at the base of the feudal and monarchical fabrics of the old world, has some reason in common experience. Every man,—mathematician, artist, soldier, or merchant,—looks with confidence for some traits and talents in his own child, which he would not dare to presume in the child of a stranger. The Orientalists are very orthodox on this point. "Take a thorn-bush," said the emir Abdel-Kader, "and sprinkle it for a whole year with water;—it will yield nothing but thorns. Take a date-tree, leave it without culture, and it will always produce dates. Nobility is the date-tree, and the Arab populace is a bush of thorns."

Manners are partly constructed, but mostly, there needs to be an inherent capacity for culture. Otherwise, all culture is pointless. The stubborn belief in bloodlines, which underpins the feudal and monarchical systems of the old world, has some basis in common experience. Every person—whether a mathematician, artist, soldier, or merchant—looks with confidence for certain traits and talents in their own child that they wouldn't dare expect from a stranger's child. The Orientalists are quite traditional about this. "Take a thornbush," said the emir Abdel-Kader, "and water it for an entire year; it will produce nothing but thorns. Take a date palm, leave it uncultivated, and it will always bear dates. Nobility is the date palm, and the Arab populace is a thornbush."

A main fact in the history of manners is the wonderful expressiveness of the human body. If it were made of glass, or of air, and the thoughts were written on steel tablets within, it could not publish more truly its meaning than now. Wise men read very sharply all your private history in your look and gait and behavior. The whole economy of nature is bent on expression. The tell-tale body is all tongues. Men are like Geneva watches with crystal faces which expose the whole movement. They carry the liquor of life flowing up and down in these beautiful bottles, and announcing to the curious how it is with them. The face and eyes reveal what the spirit is doing, how old it is, what aims it has. The eyes indicate the antiquity of the soul, or, through how many forms it has already ascended. It almost violates the proprieties, if we say above the breath here, what the confessing eyes do not hesitate to utter to every street passenger.

A key point in the history of social behavior is the incredible expressiveness of the human body. If it were made of glass or air, and our thoughts were etched on metal tablets inside, it couldn't communicate its meaning more clearly than it does now. Observant people can read your entire personal history just from your appearance, movements, and actions. Nature's entire system focuses on expression. The revealing body speaks volumes. Humans are like Geneva watches with transparent faces that show all the inner workings. They carry the essence of life flowing in these beautiful vessels, displaying their state to those who are interested. The face and eyes display what the spirit is up to, its age, and its goals. The eyes reveal the history of the soul or how many transformations it has gone through. It nearly breaches social norms to say what is spoken above a whisper, as the eyes confess openly to every passerby.

Man cannot fix his eye on the sun, and so far seems imperfect. In Siberia, a late traveller found men who could see the satellites of Jupiter with their unarmed eye. In some respects the animals excel us. The birds have a longer sight, beside the advantage by their wings of a higher observatory. A cow can bid her calf by secret signal, probably of the eye, to run away, or to lie down and hide itself. The jockeys say of certain horses, that "they look over the whole ground." The outdoor life, and hunting, and labor, give equal vigor to the human eye. A farmer looks out at you as strong as the horse; his eye-beam is like the stroke of a staff. An eye can threaten like a loaded and levelled gun, or can insult like hissing or kicking; or, in its altered mood, by beams of kindness, it can make the heart dance with joy.

A person can't focus on the sun, which makes them seem limited. In Siberia, a recent traveler discovered people who could see Jupiter's moons with their bare eyes. In some ways, animals outperform us. Birds have better vision, and with their wings, they can also see from higher up. A cow can use subtle signals, probably with its eyes, to tell its calf to run or to hide. Jockeys say certain horses "can see everything around them." Living outdoors, hunting, and working gives our eyes the same strength. A farmer looks at you as powerfully as a horse; their gaze is as strong as a blow from a stick. An eye can threaten like a loaded gun or insult like hissing or kicking; or in a different mood, with expressions of kindness, it can make your heart leap with joy.

The eye obeys exactly the action of the mind. When a thought strikes us, the eyes fix, and remain gazing at a distance; in enumerating the names of persons or of countries, as France, Germany, Spain, Turkey, the eyes wink at each new name. There is no nicety of learning sought by the mind, which the eyes do not vie in acquiring. "An artist," said Michel Angelo, "must have his measuring tools not in the hand, but in the eye;" and there is no end to the catalogue of its performances, whether in indolent vision, (that of health and beauty,) or in strained vision, (that of art and labor.)

The eye perfectly follows the mind's actions. When a thought comes to us, our eyes fixate and stare off into the distance; while listing names of people or places, such as France, Germany, Spain, and Turkey, our eyes blink with each new name. There's no detail the mind aims to learn that the eyes don't compete to grasp. "An artist," Michelangelo said, "must have his measuring tools not in hand, but in the eye;" and the list of its capabilities is endless, whether in relaxed vision (that of health and beauty) or in focused vision (that of art and hard work).

Eyes are bold as lions,—roving, running, leaping, here and there, far and near. They speak all languages. They wait for no introduction; they are no Englishmen; ask no leave of age, or rank; they respect neither poverty nor riches, neither learning nor power, nor virtue, nor sex, but intrude, and come again, and go through and through you, in a moment of time. What inundation of life and thought is discharged from one soul into another, through them! The glance is natural magic. The mysterious communication established across a house between two entire strangers, moves all the springs of wonder. The communication by the glance is in the greatest part not subject to the control of the will. It is the bodily symbol of identity of nature. We look into the eyes to know if this other form is another self, and the eyes will not lie, but make a faithful confession what inhabitant is there. The revelations are sometimes terrific. The confession of a low, usurping devil is there made, and the observer shall seem to feel the stirring of owls, and bats, and horned hoofs, where he looked for innocence and simplicity. 'Tis remarkable, too, that the spirit that appears at the windows of the house does at once invest himself in a new form of his own, to the mind of the beholder.

Eyes are as bold as lions—roaming, running, leaping, here and there, far and near. They speak every language. They don’t wait for any introduction; they aren’t English; they ask no permission from age or rank; they don’t respect poverty or wealth, learning or power, virtue or gender, but intrude, come and go through you in an instant. What a flood of life and thought pours from one soul into another through them! The glance is pure magic. The mysterious connection formed between two complete strangers across a room triggers all kinds of wonder. This communication through a glance is largely beyond our control. It’s the physical symbol of our shared humanity. We look into eyes to see if this other person is another self, and the eyes won’t lie; they reveal the truth about who is there. The revelations can sometimes be shocking. The confession of a low, usurping devil is revealed, and the observer may feel the presence of owls, bats, and hooves where they expected innocence and simplicity. It’s also remarkable that the spirit appearing in the windows of the soul immediately takes on a new form in the mind of the observer.

The eyes of men converse as much as their tongues, with the advantage, that the ocular dialect needs no dictionary, but is understood all the world over. When the eyes say one thing, and the tongue another, a practised man relies on the language of the first. If the man is off his centre, the eyes show it. You can read in the eyes of your companion, whether your argument hits him, though his tongue will not confess it. There is a look by which a man shows he is going to say a good thing, and a look when he has said it. Vain and forgotten are all the fine offers and offices of hospitality, if there is no holiday in the eye. How many furtive inclinations avowed by the eye, though dissembled by the lips! One comes away from a company, in which, it may easily happen, he has said nothing, and no important remark has been addressed to him, and yet, if in sympathy with the society, he shall not have a sense of this fact, such a stream of life has been flowing into him, and out from him, through the eyes. There are eyes, to be sure, that give no more admission into the man than blueberries. Others are liquid and deep,—wells that a man might fall into;—others are aggressive and devouring, seem to call out the police, take all too much notice, and require crowded Broadways, and the security of millions, to protect individuals against them. The military eye I meet, now darkly sparkling under clerical, now under rustic brows. 'Tis the city of Lacedæmon; 'tis a stack of bayonets. There are asking eyes, asserting eyes, prowling eyes; and eyes full of fate,—some of good, and some of sinister omen. The alleged power to charm down insanity, or ferocity in beasts, is a power behind the eye. It must be a victory achieved in the will, before it can be signified in the eye. 'Tis very certain that each man carries in his eye the exact indication of his rank in the immense scale of men, and we are always learning to read it. A complete man should need no auxiliaries to his personal presence. Whoever looked on him would consent to his will, being certified that his aims were generous and universal. The reason why men do not obey us, is because they see the mud at the bottom of our eye.

The eyes of men communicate just as much as their words do, with the advantage that the language of the eyes doesn’t need a translator and is understood all over the world. When the eyes express one thing and the mouth says another, a skilled observer trusts the first. If a person is off balance, their eyes reveal it. You can tell by your companion's eyes if your argument is affecting him, even if his words say otherwise. There’s a look that shows a person is about to say something clever, and another when he has said it. All the elaborate gestures and offers of hospitality mean nothing if there’s no spark in the eye. How many hidden desires are revealed by the eyes, even if the lips disguise them! One can leave a gathering where he may not have spoken at all or received any significant remarks, and yet, if he feels connected to the group, he won’t even notice that fact; a flow of life has been moving in and out of him through the eyes. Some eyes, of course, let you in no more than blueberries do. Others are deep and liquid—wells one could fall into; some are aggressive and consuming, seeming to call for attention, needing crowded streets and the safety of millions to shield individuals from them. I encounter the military gaze, now subtly shining beneath clerical or rustic brows. It’s the city of Lacedæmon; it’s a pile of bayonets. There are inquiring eyes, assertive eyes, lurking eyes; and eyes filled with destiny—some bring good, and some carry a dark omen. The supposed ability to calm madness or ferocity in animals comes from strength in the eyes. It must be a victory achieved within the will before it can be shown in the eyes. It's clear that each person carries in their eyes a precise indication of their rank in the vast hierarchy of humanity, and we are constantly learning to interpret it. A complete person shouldn’t need anything to support their presence. Anyone who looks at them would agree with their intentions, knowing they are generous and inclusive. The reason men don’t follow us is that they see the flaws lurking in our eyes.

If the organ of sight is such a vehicle of power, the other features have their own. A man finds room in the few square inches of the face for the traits of all his ancestors; for the expression of all his history, and his wants. The sculptor, and Winckelmann, and Lavater, will tell you how significant a feature is the nose; how its forms express strength or weakness of will, and good or bad temper. The nose of Julius Cæsar, of Dante, and of Pitt, suggest "the terrors of the beak." What refinement, and what limitations, the teeth betray! "Beware you don't laugh," said the wise mother, "for then you show all your faults."

If the eyes are such a powerful tool, the other features have their importance too. A person fits the traits of all his ancestors into just a few square inches of his face; it reflects all his history and his desires. The sculptor, along with Winckelmann and Lavater, will tell you how telling a feature the nose is; how its shapes reveal strength or weakness of will, and good or bad temperament. The noses of Julius Caesar, Dante, and Pitt suggest "the terrors of the beak." What delicacy, and what limitations, the teeth reveal! "Be careful not to laugh," said the wise mother, "because then you expose all your flaws."

Balzac left in manuscript a chapter, which he called "Théorie de la démarche" in which he says: "The look, the voice, the respiration, and the attitude or walk, are identical. But, as it has not been given to man, the power to stand guard, at once, over these four different simultaneous expressions of his thought, watch that one which speaks out the truth, and you will know the whole man."

Balzac left behind a manuscript chapter, which he called "Théorie de la démarche", in which he says: "The gaze, the voice, the breath, and the posture or walk are all the same. However, since humans don't have the ability to oversee these four different expressions of their thoughts at once, pay attention to the one that reveals the truth, and you will understand the whole person."

Palaces interest us mainly in the exhibition of manners, which, in the idle and expensive society dwelling in them, are raised to a high art. The maxim of courts is, that manner is power. A calm and resolute bearing, a polished speech, an embellishment of trifles, and the art of hiding all uncomfortable feeling, are essential to the courtier: and Saint Simon, and Cardinal de Retz, and Roederer, and an encyclopædia of Mémoires, will instruct you, if you wish, in those potent secrets. Thus, it is a point of pride with kings, to remember faces and names. It is reported of one prince, that his head had the air of leaning downwards, in order not to humble the crowd. There are people who come in ever like a child with a piece of good news. It was said of the late Lord Holland, that he always came down to breakfast with the air of a man who had just met with some signal good-fortune. In "Notre Dame," the grandee took his place on the dais, with the look of one who is thinking of something else. But we must not peep and eavesdrop at palace-doors.

Palaces mainly catch our attention through the display of manners, which are elevated to a high art in the wealthy and leisurely society that resides in them. The principle of courts is that manner is power. A composed and determined demeanor, polished speech, embellishing trivialities, and the skill of concealing any discomfort are crucial for a courtier. If you're interested, Saint Simon, Cardinal de Retz, Roederer, and a whole collection of Mémoires will guide you through those powerful secrets. Thus, it's a point of pride for kings to remember faces and names. It's said of one prince that he held his head down slightly to avoid overshadowing the crowd. Some people enter like a child bringing good news. It was mentioned about the late Lord Holland that he always came to breakfast looking like someone who had just experienced a significant stroke of luck. In "Notre Dame," the noble took his seat on the dais, appearing as though he was lost in thought. But we shouldn't spy or listen in at palace doors.

Fine manners need the support of fine manners in others. A scholar may be a well-bred man, or he may not. The enthusiast is introduced to polished scholars in society, and is chilled and silenced by finding himself not in their element. They all have somewhat which he has not, and, it seems, ought to have. But if he finds the scholar apart from his companions, it is then the enthusiast's turn, and the scholar has no defence, but must deal on his terms. Now they must fight the battle out on their private strengths. What is the talent of that character so common,—the successful man of the world,—in all marts, senates, and drawing-rooms? Manners: manners of power; sense to see his advantage, and manners up to it. See him approach his man. He knows that troops behave as they are handled at first;—that is his cheap secret; just what happens to every two persons who meet on any affair,—one instantly perceives that he has the key of the situation, that his will comprehends the other's will, as the cat does the mouse; and he has only to use courtesy, and furnish good-natured reasons to his victim to cover up the chain, lest he be shamed into resistance.

Good manners rely on good manners in others. A scholar may have good breeding, or he may not. An enthusiastic person meets well-mannered scholars in social settings and feels out of place, subdued by the realization that he's not in their world. They all possess something he lacks, which he feels he should have. However, if he encounters the scholar away from his peers, it's the enthusiast's turn, and the scholar has no defense; he must engage on the enthusiast's terms. Now, they must settle the matter based on their individual strengths. What is the quality of that common character—the successful person in society—in all markets, governments, and living rooms? Manners: powerful manners; the ability to recognize his advantage and behave accordingly. Watch him as he approaches someone. He understands that people react to how they're treated initially—that’s his simple secret; it’s what happens between any two people who meet regarding any matter—one quickly realizes he holds the key to the situation, that his will aligns with the other’s will, like a cat with a mouse; and he simply needs to use politeness and provide friendly justifications to his target to mask the power dynamics, so as not to provoke resistance.

The theatre in which this science of manners has a formal importance is not with us a court, but dress-circles, wherein, after the close of the day's business, men and women meet at leisure, for mutual entertainment, in ornamented drawing-rooms. Of course, it has every variety of attraction and merit; but, to earnest persons, to youths or maidens who have great objects at heart, we cannot extol it highly. A well-dressed, talkative company, where each is bent to amuse the other.—yet the high-born Turk who came hither fancied that every woman seemed to be suffering for a chair; that all the talkers were brained and exhausted by the deoxygenated air: it spoiled the best persons: it put all on stilts. Yet here are the secret biographies written and read. The aspect of that man is repulsive: I do not wish to deal with him. The other is irritable, shy, and on his guard. The youth looks humble and manly: I choose him. Look on this woman. There is not beauty, nor brilliant sayings, nor distinguished power to serve you; but all see her gladly; her whole air and impression are healthful. Here come the sentimentalists, and the invalids. Here is Elise, who caught cold in coming into the world, and has always increased it since. Here are creep-mouse manners; and thievish manners. "Look at Northcote," said Fuseli; "he looks like a rat that has seen a cat." In the shallow company, easily excited, easily tired, here is the columnar Bernard: the Alleghanies do not express more repose than his behavior. Here are the sweet following eyes of Cecile: it seemed always that she demanded the heart. Nothing can be more excellent in kind than the Corinthian grace of Gertrude's manners, and yet Blanche, who has no manners, has better manners than she; for the movements of Blanche are the sallies of a spirit which is sufficient for the moment, and she can afford to express every thought by instant action.

The setting where this social science holds formal significance isn’t a royal court but rather dress circles, where, after a day’s work, men and women gather casually for shared entertainment in lavish drawing rooms. Naturally, it offers all kinds of charm and appeal, but to serious individuals, whether young men or women with important aspirations, we can't praise it too highly. It’s a well-dressed, chatty crowd, where everyone is focused on entertaining one another. Yet the upper-class Turk who visited here thought every woman looked like she was longing for a seat; that all the speakers seemed mentally drained and breathless from the stuffy air: it spoiled the best of people and elevated all to an unnatural height. Here, secret lives are written and shared. That man’s demeanor is off-putting: I don’t want to engage with him. The other is touchy, shy, and overly cautious. The young man seems humble and strong: I prefer him. Look at this woman. She may lack beauty, clever remarks, or exceptional talent, but everyone enjoys her presence; she radiates vitality. Here come the sentimental types and the fragile ones. There’s Elise, who caught a cold when she entered the world and has been sick ever since. Here are timid behaviors and sneaky attitudes. "Look at Northcote," Fuseli said; "he looks like a rat that has seen a cat." In this superficial crowd, easily stirred and quickly exhausted, stands the stable Bernard: the Alleghenies don’t convey more calm than he does. Here are Cecile’s sweet, hopeful eyes; it always seems like she’s seeking the heart. Nothing compares to the elegant nature of Gertrude’s manners, yet Blanche, who has no particular manners, displays better ones because her actions are spontaneous bursts of a spirit that’s present in the moment, and she can afford to express every thought through immediate action.

Manners have been somewhat cynically defined to be a contrivance of wise men to keep fools at a distance. Fashion is shrewd to detect those who do not belong to her train, and seldom wastes her attentions. Society is very swift in its instincts, and, if you do not belong to it, resists and sneers at you; or quietly drops you. The first weapon enrages the party attacked; the second is still more effective, but is not to be resisted, as the date of the transaction is not easily found. People grow up and grow old under this infliction, and never suspect the truth, ascribing the solitude which acts on them very injuriously, to any cause but the right one.

Manners have been somewhat cynically defined as a way for smart people to keep fools at a distance. Fashion is quick to spot those who don’t fit in with her crowd and rarely bothers with them. Society has sharp instincts, and if you don’t belong, it either pushes you away and mocks you or just ignores you completely. The first response makes the attacked person angry; the second is even more effective because it can't easily be opposed, as the reason for it isn’t obvious. People grow up and grow old under this pressure and never realize the truth, blaming the loneliness they experience on anything but the real cause.

The basis of good manners is self-reliance. Necessity is the law of all who are not self-possessed. Those who are not self-possessed, obtrude, and pain us. Some men appear to feel that they belong to a Pariah caste. They fear to offend, they bend and apologize, and walk through life with a timid step. As we sometimes dream that we are in a well-dressed company without any coat, so Godfrey acts ever as if he suffered from some mortifying circumstance. The hero should find himself at home, wherever he is; should impart comfort by his own security and good-nature to all beholders. The hero is suffered to be himself. A person of strong mind comes to perceive that for him an immunity is secured so long as he renders to society that service which is native and proper to him,—an immunity from all the observances, yea, and duties, which society so tyrannically imposes on the rank and file of its members. "Euripides," says Aspasia, "has not the fine manners of Sophocles; but,"—she adds good-humoredly, "the movers and masters of our souls have surely a right to throw out their limbs as carelessly as they please, on the world that belongs to them, and before the creatures they have animated."4

The foundation of good manners is self-reliance. Necessity is the rule for those who lack self-confidence. Those who lack self-confidence intrude upon us and cause discomfort. Some people seem to feel like they're part of a rejected group. They worry about offending others, constantly apologize, and move through life hesitantly. Just as we sometimes dream we're in a stylish gathering without wearing a coat, Godfrey acts as if he's under some embarrassing situation. A true hero should feel at home wherever they are and provide comfort through their own confidence and good nature to everyone around them. The hero is allowed to be themselves. A strong-minded person realizes that they have a sort of immunity as long as they contribute their genuine talents to society—an immunity from all the rules and obligations that society imposes so harshly on the average person. "Euripides," Aspasia says, "doesn't have the refined manners of Sophocles; but,"—she adds with a smile, "the ones who move and inspire us certainly have the right to express themselves freely in the world that belongs to them, and in front of those they've brought to life."4

[4]

Landor: Pericles and Aspasia.

Landor: Pericles and Aspasia.

Manners require time, as nothing is more vulgar than haste. Friendship should be surrounded with ceremonies and respects, and not crushed into corners. Friendship requires more time than poor busy men can usually command. Here comes to me Roland, with a delicacy of sentiment leading and inwrapping him like a divine cloud or holy ghost. 'Tis a great destitution to both that this should not be entertained with large leisures, but contrariwise should be balked by importunate affairs.

Manners take time, because nothing is more rude than rushing. Friendship should be surrounded by rituals and respect, not pushed aside into corners. Friendship needs more time than busy people can usually spare. Here comes Roland, with a sensitivity that wraps around him like a divine cloud or a holy spirit. It's really unfortunate for both of us that this can’t be enjoyed with plenty of time, but instead has to be interrupted by urgent matters.

But through this lustrous varnish, the reality is ever shining. 'Tis hard to keep the what from breaking through this pretty painting of the how. The core will come to the surface. Strong will and keen perception overpower old manners, and create new; and the thought of the present moment has a greater value than all the past. In persons of character, we do not remark manners, because of their instantaneousness. We are surprised by the thing done, out of all power to watch the way of it. Yet nothing is more charming than to recognize the great style which runs through the actions of such. People masquerade before us in their fortunes, titles, offices, and connections, as academic or civil presidents, or senators, or professors, or great lawyers, and impose on the frivolous, and a good deal on each other, by these fames. At least, it is a point of prudent good manners to treat these reputations tenderly, as if they were merited. But the sad realist knows these fellows at a glance, and they know him; as when in Paris the chief of the police enters a ballroom, so many diamonded pretenders shrink and make themselves as inconspicuous as they can, or give him a supplicating look as they pass. "I had received," said a sibyl, "I had received at birth the fatal gift of penetration:"—and these Cassandras are always born.

But through this shiny surface, the reality is always shining through. It’s hard to keep the what from breaking through this pretty picture of the how. The core will eventually emerge. Strong will and sharp perception overpower old habits and create new ones; the thought of the present moment holds more value than all the past. In people of character, we don’t notice their manners because they’re so spontaneous. We are struck by the action itself, unable to pay attention to how it happened. Yet nothing is more delightful than to see the elegant style that runs through their actions. People put on a show before us with their wealth, titles, jobs, and connections, pretending to be academics or civic leaders, senators, professors, or top lawyers, and they impress the superficial and a fair number of each other with these reputations. At the very least, it’s considered polite to treat these reputations with care, as if they are deserved. But the sad realist sees through these people instantly, and they see him too; like when the police chief walks into a ballroom in Paris, many bejeweled pretenders shrink away and try to stay out of sight, or give him a pleading look as they pass. "I had received," said a prophetess, "I had received at birth the fatal gift of insight:"—and these Cassandra-like figures are always born.

Manners impress as they indicate real power. A man who is sure of his point, carries a broad and contented expression, which everybody reads. And you cannot rightly train one to an air and manner, except by making him the kind of man of whom that manner is the natural expression. Nature forever puts a premium on reality. What is done for effect, is seen to be done for effect; what is done for love, is felt to be done for love. A man inspires affection and honor, because he was not lying in wait for these. The things of a man for which we visit him, were done in the dark and the cold. A little integrity is better than any career. So deep are the sources of this surface-action, that even the size of your companion seems to vary with his freedom of thought. Not only is he larger, when at ease, and his thoughts generous, but everything around him becomes variable with expression. No carpenter's rule, no rod and chain, will measure the dimensions of any house or house-lot: go into the house: if the proprietor is constrained and deferring, 'tis of no importance how large his house, how beautiful his grounds,—you quickly come to the end of all: but if the man is self-possessed, happy, and at home, his house is deep-founded, indefinitely large and interesting, the roof and dome buoyant as the sky. Under the humblest roof, the commonest person in plain clothes sits there massive, cheerful, yet formidable like the Egyptian colossi.

Manners make an impression because they show true power. A person who is confident in their beliefs has a broad and content expression that everyone notices. You can only really teach someone to have a certain demeanor by helping them become the kind of person for whom that demeanor comes naturally. Nature always values authenticity. Actions done for show are easy to see as such; actions done out of genuine care are felt as sincere. A person earns affection and respect not because they are seeking it. The qualities that draw us to someone were often cultivated away from the spotlight. A little integrity goes further than any career success. The roots of this outward behavior run so deep that even the way someone appears changes with their freedom of thought. Not only does a person seem bigger when they are relaxed and their thoughts are generous, but everything around them seems to change with their mood. No measurement tool can accurately quantify a house or its property: step inside, and if the host is tense and submissive, it doesn’t matter how big their house or beautiful their grounds are—you’ll soon lose interest. But if the person is self-assured, happy, and at home, their house feels solid, expansive, and fascinating, with a roof and dome that seem light as the sky. Under the simplest roof, the most ordinary person in casual clothes can still sit there with a strong presence, cheerful yet impressive, like the giant statues of ancient Egypt.

Neither Aristotle, nor Leibnitz, nor Junius, nor Champollion has set down the grammar-rules of this dialect, older than Sanscrit; but they who cannot yet read English, can read this. Men take each other's measure, when they meet for the first time,—and every time they meet. How do they get this rapid knowledge, even before they speak, of each other's power and dispositions? One would say, that the persuasion of their speech is not in what they say,—or, that men do not convince by their argument,—but by their personality, by who they are, and what they said and did heretofore. A man already strong is listened to, and everything he says is applauded. Another opposes him with sound argument, but the argument is scouted, until by and by it gets into the mind of some weighty person; then it begins to tell on the community.

Neither Aristotle, nor Leibnitz, nor Junius, nor Champollion has written down the rules of this dialect, which is older than Sanskrit; but those who can’t read English yet can understand this. People size each other up when they meet for the first time—and every time they get together. How do they gain this quick insight, even before they speak, into each other's abilities and attitudes? One might say that the power of their speech doesn’t come from what they say—or that people don’t persuade through their arguments—but through their presence, who they are, and what they’ve said and done before. A man who is already strong is listened to, and everything he says is praised. Another might challenge him with solid reasoning, but that argument is dismissed until eventually, it resonates with someone influential; then it starts to make an impact on the community.

Self-reliance is the basis of behavior, as it is the guaranty that the powers are not squandered in too much demonstration. In this country, where school education is universal, we have a superficial culture, and a profusion of reading and writing and expression. We parade our nobilities in poems and orations, instead of working them up into happiness. There is a whisper out of the ages to him who can understand it,—'whatever is known to thyself alone, has always very great value.' There is some reason to believe, that, when a man does not write his poetry, it escapes by other vents through him, instead of the one vent of writing; clings to his form and manners, whilst poets have often nothing poetical about them except their verses. Jacobi said, that "when a man has fully expressed his thought, he has somewhat less possession of it." One would say, the rule is,—What a man is irresistibly urged to say, helps him and us. In explaining his thought to others, he explains it to himself: but when he opens it for show, it corrupts him.

Self-reliance is the foundation of our behavior because it ensures that our abilities aren't wasted on excessive display. In this country, where school education is widespread, we have a shallow culture filled with abundant reading, writing, and expression. We showcase our talents in poems and speeches instead of turning them into genuine happiness. There's a message from the past for those who can grasp it: 'whatever you know solely for yourself holds significant value.' There's reason to believe that when someone doesn’t write their poetry, it finds other ways to express itself through them, influencing their demeanor, while poets often lack any true poetic quality beyond their verses. Jacobi said that "when a person fully articulates their thoughts, they possess a little less of it." It seems the principle is this: what someone feels compelled to say benefits both them and us. By sharing their thoughts with others, they clarify them for themselves; however, when they present them for mere exhibition, it undermines their integrity.

Society is the stage on which manners are shown; novels are their literature. Novels are the journal or record of manners; and the new importance of these books derives from the fact, that the novelist begins to penetrate the surface, and treat this part of life more worthily. The novels used to be all alike, and had a quite vulgar tone. The novels used to lead us on to a foolish interest in the fortunes of the boy and girl they described. The boy was to be raised from a humble to a high position. He was in want of a wife and a castle, and the object of the story was to supply him with one or both. We watched sympathetically, step by step, his climbing, until, at last, the point is gained, the wedding day is fixed, and we follow the gala procession home to the castle, when the doors are slammed in our face, and the poor reader is left outside in the cold, not enriched by so much as an idea, or a virtuous impulse.

Society is the stage where manners are displayed; novels are the literature that reflect them. Novels serve as a journal or record of social behavior, and their renewed significance comes from the fact that contemporary novelists are starting to look deeper and portray this aspect of life with more respect. In the past, novels were all pretty similar and had a rather ordinary tone. They used to lead us into a naive fascination with the lives of the boy and girl they depicted. The boy would rise from a lowly status to a high position, seeking a wife and a castle, and the story's goal was to provide him with one or both. We followed him sympathetically, step by step, as he climbed the social ladder. Finally, the moment arrives, the wedding day is set, and we trail the festive procession back to the castle, only to have the doors shut in our faces, leaving the poor reader out in the cold, deprived of even an idea or a moral lesson.

But the victories of character are instant, and victories for all. Its greatness enlarges all. We are fortified by every heroic anecdote. The novels are as useful as Bibles, if they teach you the secret, that the best of life is conversation, and the greatest success is confidence, or perfect understanding between sincere people. 'Tis a French definition of friendship, rien que s'entendre, good understanding. The highest compact we can make with our fellow, is,—'Let there be truth between us two for evermore.' That is the charm in all good novels, as it is the charm in all good histories, that the heroes mutually understand, from the first, and deal loyally, and with a profound trust in each other. It is sublime to feel and say of another, I need never meet, or speak, or write to him: we need not reinforce ourselves, or send tokens of remembrance: I rely on him as on myself: if he did thus or thus, I know it was right.

But the victories of character are immediate and beneficial for everyone. Its greatness expands all. We're strengthened by every heroic story. Novels are as valuable as Bibles if they teach you the secret that the best part of life is conversation, and the greatest success is confidence or complete understanding between sincere people. It’s a French definition of friendship: rien que s'entendre, good understanding. The highest agreement we can make with each other is, "Let there be truth between us forever." That’s the magic in all good novels, just as it is in all good histories, where the heroes understand each other from the very beginning and interact loyally, with deep trust in one another. It’s amazing to feel and say about someone else, I never need to meet, or talk, or write to them: we don't need to reassure ourselves or send mementos: I trust them as I trust myself: if they did this or that, I know it was right.

In all the superior people I have met, I notice directness, truth spoken more truly, as if everything of obstruction, of malformation, had been trained away. What have they to conceal? What have they to exhibit? Between simple and noble persons, there is always a quick intelligence: they recognize at sight, and meet on a better ground than the talents and skills they may chance to possess, namely, on sincerity and uprightness. For, it is not what talents or genius a man has, but how he is to his talents, that constitutes friendship and character. The man that stands by himself, the universe stands by him also. It is related of the monk Basle, that, being excommunicated by the Pope, he was, at his death, sent in charge of an angel to find a fit place of suffering in hell; but, such was the eloquence and good-humor of the monk, that, wherever he went he was received gladly, and civilly treated, even by the most uncivil angels: and, when he came to discourse with them, instead of contradicting or forcing him, they took his part, and adopted his manners: and even good angels came from far, to see him, and take up their abode with him. The angel that was sent to find a place of torment for him, attempted to remove him to a worse pit, but with no better success; for such was the contented spirit of the monk, that he found something to praise in every place and company, though in hell, and made a kind of heaven of it. At last the escorting angel returned with his prisoner to them that sent him, saying, that no phlegethon could be found that would burn him; for that, in whatever condition, Basle remained incorrigibly Basle. The legend says, his sentence was remitted, and he was allowed to go into heaven, and was canonized as a saint.

In all the remarkable people I've met, I notice a straightforwardness, a deeper truth in what they say, as if all barriers and distortions have been trained out of them. What do they have to hide? What do they feel the need to show? Between straightforward and admirable individuals, there's always a sharp insight: they recognize each other instantly, connecting on something more profound than any talents or skills, which is sincerity and integrity. It's not about what abilities or brilliance someone has, but how they relate to those talents that defines friendship and character. A person who stands alone has the universe supporting him too. There's a story about the monk Basle, who, after being excommunicated by the Pope, was escorted by an angel to find a fitting place of suffering in hell. However, Basle's charm and humor were so compelling that wherever he went, he was welcomed and treated kindly, even by the rudest of angels. When he started talking with them, instead of arguing or trying to drive him away, they sided with him and mirrored his behavior. Even good angels traveled from far away to see him and stayed with him. The angel tasked with finding him a place of torment tried to move him to a worse spot but had no luck; Basle's content spirit found something to appreciate in every situation, even in hell, turning it into a kind of heaven. Eventually, the angel returned to those who sent him, reporting that no fiery place could harm Basle, as he remained undeniably himself in any circumstance. According to the legend, his sentence was lifted, allowing him to enter heaven, and he was canonized as a saint.

There is a stroke of magnanimity in the correspondence of Bonaparte with his brother Joseph, when the latter was King of Spain, and complained that he missed in Napoleon's letters the affectionate tone which had marked their childish correspondence. "I am sorry," replies Napoleon, "you think you shall find your brother again only in the Elysian Fields. It is natural, that at forty, he should not feel towards you as he did at twelve. But his feelings towards you have greater truth and strength. His friendship has the features of his mind."

There’s a touch of kindness in the letters between Bonaparte and his brother Joseph when Joseph, who was King of Spain, expressed that he missed the warm tone of their childhood letters. “I’m sorry,” Napoleon replies, “you think you’ll find your brother again only in the afterlife. It’s natural for someone at forty not to feel the same way he did at twelve. But his feelings for you are more genuine and stronger. His friendship reflects who he is.”

How much we forgive to those who yield us the rare spectacle of heroic manners! We will pardon them the want of books, of arts, and even of the gentler virtues. How tenaciously we remember them! Here is a lesson which I brought along with me in boyhood from the Latin School, and which ranks with the best of Roman anecdotes. Marcus Scaurus was accused by Quintus Varius Hispanus, that he had excited the allies to take arms against the Republic. But he, full of firmness and gravity, defended himself in this manner: "Quintus Varius Hispanus alleges that Marcus Scaurus, President of the Senate, excited the allies to arms: Marcus Scaurus, President of the Senate, denies it. There is no witness. Which do you believe, Romans?" "Utri creditis, Quirites?" When he had said these words, he was absolved by the assembly of the people.

How much we forgive those who show us the rare sight of heroic behavior! We overlook their lack of books, arts, and even gentler virtues. We hold onto their memories so tightly! Here’s a lesson I carried with me from Latin School in my youth, which ranks among the best Roman stories. Marcus Scaurus was accused by Quintus Varius Hispanus of urging the allies to take up arms against the Republic. But he, full of strength and seriousness, defended himself like this: “Quintus Varius Hispanus claims that Marcus Scaurus, President of the Senate, incited the allies to arms: Marcus Scaurus, President of the Senate, denies it. There is no witness. Who do you believe, Romans?” "Utri creditis, Quirites?" After he said these words, he was acquitted by the assembly of the people.

I have seen manners that make a similar impression with personal beauty; that give the like exhilaration, and refine us like that; and, in memorable experiences, they are suddenly better than beauty, and make that superfluous and ugly. But they must be marked by fine perception, the acquaintance with real beauty. They must always show self-control: you shall not be facile, apologetic, or leaky, but king over your word; and every gesture and action shall indicate power at rest. Then they must be inspired by the good heart. There is no beautifier of complexion, or form, or behavior, like the wish to scatter joy and not pain around us.

I have witnessed manners that create a similar impression to personal beauty; they exhilarate us in the same way and refine us just like that; in unforgettable moments, they can even surpass beauty, making it seem unnecessary and unattractive. However, they must be characterized by a keen perception and an understanding of true beauty. They should always reflect self-control: you shouldn’t be overly agreeable, apologetic, or vulnerable, but rather be in command of your words; and every gesture and action should convey a sense of power that is at rest. Additionally, they must be driven by a kind heart. There’s no better way to enhance one’s appearance, form, or behavior than the desire to spread joy instead of pain around us.

'Tis good to give a stranger a meal, or a night's lodging. 'Tis better to be hospitable to his good meaning and thought, and give courage to a companion. We must be as courteous to a man as we are to a picture, which we are willing to give the advantage of a good light. Special precepts are not to be thought of: the talent of well-doing contains them all. Every hour will show a duty as paramount as that of my whim just now; and yet I will write it,—that there is one topic peremptorily forbidden to all well-bred, to all rational mortals, namely, their distempers. If you have not slept, or if you have slept, or if you have headache, or sciatica, or leprosy, or thunder-stroke, I beseech you, by all angels, to hold your peace, and not pollute the morning, to which all the housemates bring serene and pleasant thoughts, by corruption and groans. Come out of the azure. Love the day. Do not leave the sky out of your landscape. The oldest and the most deserving person should come very modestly into any newly awaked company, respecting the divine communications, out of which all must be presumed to have newly come. An old man who added an elevating culture to a large experience of life, said to me, "When you come into the room, I think I will study how to make humanity beautiful to you."

It's good to offer a stranger a meal or a place to stay. It's even better to be welcoming to their good intentions and lift up a friend. We should treat a person with the same courtesy we would give a painting, making sure it has the best light. We don’t need special rules; the ability to do good covers everything. Every moment will present a duty as important as my current impulse; yet, I must point out that there’s one topic that’s completely off-limits for well-mannered, rational people: their ailments. If you haven't slept, or if you have, or if you have a headache, or sciatica, or a serious illness, I kindly ask you, by all that is holy, to stay quiet and not spoil the morning with negativity, which everyone else is trying to fill with positivity. Step into the light. Embrace the day. Don’t forget to include the sky in your view. Even the oldest and most deserving person should enter a newly awakened gathering with humility, honoring the fresh interactions that everyone has just experienced. An older man who combined wisdom with rich life experiences once told me, "When you walk into the room, I think I will learn how to make humanity beautiful for you."

As respects the delicate question of culture, I do not think that any other than negative rules can be laid down. For positive rules, for suggestion, Nature alone inspires it. Who dare assume to guide a youth, a maid, to perfect manners?—the golden mean is so delicate, difficult,—say frankly, unattainable. What finest hands would not be clumsy to sketch the genial precepts of the young girl's demeanor? The chances seem infinite against success; and yet success is continually attained. There must not be secondariness, and 'tis a thousand to one that her air and manner will at once betray that she is not primary, but that there is some other one or many of her class, to whom she habitually postpones herself. But Nature lifts her easily, and without knowing it, over these impossibilities, and we are continually surprised with graces and felicities not only unteachable, but undescribable.

When it comes to the sensitive issue of culture, I believe that only negative rules can be established. Positive rules, or suggestions, come solely from Nature. Who would dare to try to teach a young person perfect manners?—the ideal balance is so fragile and challenging—let's be honest, it's practically impossible. What skilled hands could accurately outline the charming behaviors of a young woman? The odds seem stacked against success; yet it is consistently achieved. There must be no second-rate qualities, and it's highly likely that her demeanor will instantly reveal that she is not original, but that she habitually looks up to someone else in her group. However, Nature effortlessly elevates her, often without her awareness, over these hurdles, and we continually marvel at her graces and joys that are not only unteachable but indescribable.

VI.

VI.

WORSHIP.

Praise.

This is he, who, felled by foes,
Sprung harmless up, refreshed by blows
He to captivity was sold,
But him no prison-bars would hold:
Though they sealed him in a rock,
Mountain chains he can unlock:
Thrown to lions for their meat,
The crouching lion kissed his feet:
Bound to the stake, no flames appalled,
But arched o'er him an honoring vault.
This is he men miscall Fate,
Threading dark ways, arriving late,
But ever coming in time to crown
The truth, and hurl wrongdoers down.
He is the oldest, and best known,
More near than aught thou call'st thy own,
Yet, greeted in another's eyes,
Disconcerts with glad surprise.
This is Jove, who, deaf to prayers,
Floods with blessings unawares.
Draw, if thou canst, the mystic line,
Severing rightly his from thine,
Which is human, which divine.
This is the one who, struck down by enemies,
Rises unharmed, strengthened by blows.
He was sold into captivity,
But no prison bars could contain him:
Though trapped within a rock,
He can unlock mountain chains:
Thrown to lions for their meal,
The crouching lion kissed his feet:
Bound to the stake, he was not afraid of flames,
But instead was sheltered by an honoring vault.
This is what people mistakenly call Fate,
Navigating dark paths, arriving late,
But always showing up in time to reward
Truth and bring down wrongdoers.
He is the oldest and best known,
Closer to you than anything you call your own,
Yet, when seen through another's eyes,
He surprises with joyful astonishment.
This is Jove, who, ignoring prayers,
Unexpectedly floods with blessings.
Try, if you can, to draw the mysterious line,
Separating rightly his from yours,
Identifying what is human and what is divine.

WORSHIP.

Worship.

Some of my friends have complained, when the preceding papers were read, that we discussed Fate, Power, and Wealth, on too low a platform; gave too much line to the evil spirit of the times; too many cakes to Cerberus; that we ran Cudworth's risk of making, by excess of candor, the argument of atheism so strong, that he could not answer it. I have no fears of being forced in my own despite to play, as we say, the devil's attorney. I have no infirmity of faith; no belief that it is of much importance what I or any man may say: I am sure that a certain truth will be said through me, though I should be dumb, or though I should try to say the reverse. Nor do I fear skepticism for any good soul. A just thinker will allow full swing to his skepticism. I dip my pen in the blackest ink, because I am not afraid of falling into my inkpot. I have no sympathy with a poor man I knew, who, when suicides abounded, told me he dared not look at his razor. We are of different opinions at different hours, but we always may be said to be at heart on the side of truth.

Some of my friends have complained that when the previous papers were read, we discussed Fate, Power, and Wealth from too low a standpoint; that we gave too much room to the negative spirit of the times; too many treats to Cerberus; that we risked following Cudworth's approach of being so overly honest that the case for atheism became too strong for him to counter. I’m not worried about being forced to play, as we say, the devil's advocate. I don’t have any doubts about my faith; I don’t think it matters much what I or anyone else says: I know that a certain truth will come through me, whether I’m silent or trying to argue the opposite. Nor do I fear skepticism for any good individual. A thoughtful person will fully embrace their skepticism. I write with the darkest ink because I’m not afraid of falling into my inkpot. I have no sympathy for a man I once knew who, when suicides were common, said he didn’t dare look at his razor. We may have different opinions at different times, but we can always be said to be, at heart, on the side of truth.

I see not why we should give ourselves such sanctified airs. If the Divine Providence has hid from men neither disease, nor deformity, nor corrupt society, but has stated itself out in passions, in war, in trade, in the love of power and pleasure, in hunger and need, in tyrannies, literatures, and arts,—let us not be so nice that we cannot write these facts down coarsely as they stand, or doubt but there is a counter-statement as ponderous, which we can arrive at, and which, being put, will make all square. The solar system has no anxiety about its reputation, and the credit of truth and honesty is as safe; nor have I any fear that a skeptical bias can be given by leaning hard on the sides of fate, of practical power, or of trade, which the doctrine of Faith cannot down-weigh. The strength of that principle is not measured in ounces and pounds: it tyrannizes at the centre of Nature. We may well give skepticism as much line as we can. The spirit will return, and fill us. It drives the drivers. It counterbalances any accumulations of power.

I don’t understand why we should act so holier-than-thou. If Divine Providence hasn’t hidden from us things like disease, deformity, or a corrupt society, but has instead expressed itself through passions, war, trade, the desire for power and pleasure, hunger and need, tyrannies, literature, and the arts—then let’s not be so delicate that we can’t write these truths down plainly as they are, nor should we doubt that there is an equally weighty perspective we can arrive at, which, when expressed, will balance everything out. The solar system doesn’t worry about its reputation, and the integrity of truth and honesty is just as secure; I’m not worried that a skeptical mindset can be created by taking a hard look at fate, practical power, or trade, which the doctrine of Faith can’t outweigh. The power of that principle isn’t measured in ounces and pounds; it dominates at the center of Nature. We can afford to let skepticism roam as freely as possible. The spirit will come back and fill us. It drives the drivers. It balances out any buildup of power.

"Heaven kindly gave our blood a moral flow."
"Heaven graciously allowed our blood to share a sense of morality."

We are born loyal. The whole creation is made of hooks and eyes, of bitumen, of sticking-plaster, and whether your community is made in Jerusalem or in California, of saints or of wreckers, it coheres in a perfect ball. Men as naturally make a state, or a church, as caterpillars a web. If they were more refined, it would be less formal, it would be nervous, like that of the Shakers, who, from long habit of thinking and feeling together, it is said, are affected in the same way, at the same time, to work and to play, and as they go with perfect sympathy to their tasks in the field or shop, so are they inclined for a ride or a journey at the same instant, and the horses come up with the family carriage unbespoken to the door.

We are born loyal. All of creation is made up of connections, of adhesive, and whether your community is in Jerusalem or California, made of saints or troublemakers, it comes together in a perfect whole. People naturally create a state or a church, just like caterpillars spin a web. If they were more refined, it would be less formal, more fluid, like that of the Shakers, who, from long practice of thinking and feeling together, are said to respond in the same way, at the same time, for both work and play. Just as they approach their tasks in the field or workshop with perfect harmony, they also seem to decide to go for a ride or a trip simultaneously, and the horses arrive at the family carriage at the door without being asked.

We are born believing. A man bears beliefs, as a tree bears apples. A self-poise belongs to every particle; and a rectitude to every mind, and is the Nemesis and protector of every society. I and my neighbors have been bred in the notion, that, unless we came soon to some good church,—Calvinism, or Behmenism, or Romanism, or Mormonism,—there would be a universal thaw and dissolution. No Isaiah or Jeremy has arrived. Nothing can exceed the anarchy that has followed in our skies. The stern old faiths have all pulverized. 'Tis a whole population of gentlemen and ladies out in search of religions. 'Tis as flat anarchy in our ecclesiastic realms, as that which existed in Massachusetts, in the Revolution, or which prevails now on the slope of the Rocky Mountains or Pike's Peak. Yet we make shift to live. Men are loyal. Nature has self-poise in all her works; certain proportions in which oxygen and azote combine, and, not less a harmony in faculties, a fitness in the spring and the regulator.

We are born with the capacity to believe. People hold beliefs just as trees bear fruit. Every individual has their own balance, and every mind has a sense of rightness, which acts as both a force of justice and a guardian for society. My neighbors and I have grown up with the idea that unless we soon find ourselves in a good church—whether it's Calvinism, Behmenism, Roman Catholicism, or Mormonism—there would be a complete breakdown and chaos. No prophet like Isaiah or Jeremiah has shown up. The chaos that has followed in our lives is unmatched. The rigid old beliefs have all crumbled. It's a whole society of men and women searching for meaning. The state of our religious landscape is just as chaotic as it was in Massachusetts during the Revolution, or as it is now on the slopes of the Rocky Mountains or Pike's Peak. Yet we manage to carry on. People remain loyal. Nature maintains a balance in all her creations, with specific ratios in which oxygen and nitrogen combine, as well as a harmony in functions, a fitness in the spring and the regulator.

The decline of the influence of Calvin, or Fenelon, or Wesley, or Channing, need give us no uneasiness. The builder of heaven has not so ill constructed his creature as that the religion, that is, the public nature, should fall out: the public and the private element, like north and south, like inside and outside, like centrifugal and centripetal, adhere to every soul, and cannot be subdued, except the soul is dissipated. God builds his temple in the heart on the ruins of churches and religions.

The fading influence of Calvin, Fenelon, Wesley, or Channing shouldn't worry us. The creator of the universe hasn't designed humanity in a way that allows religion, meaning our shared beliefs, to disappear. The public and private aspects of faith, like north and south, or inside and outside, or centrifugal and centripetal forces, are part of every individual and can't be overcome unless the person becomes fragmented. God builds his temple in the heart from the ashes of churches and religions.

In the last chapters, we treated some particulars of the question of culture. But the whole state of man is a state of culture; and its flowering and completion may be described as Religion, or Worship. There is always some religion, some hope and fear extended into the invisible,—from the blind boding which nails a horseshoe to the mast or the threshold, up to the song of the Elders in the Apocalypse. But the religion cannot rise above the state of the votary. Heaven always bears some proportion to earth. The god of the cannibals will be a cannibal, of the crusaders a crusader, and of the merchants a merchant. In all ages, souls out of time, extraordinary, prophetic, are born, who are rather related to the system of the world, than to their particular age and locality. These announce absolute truths, which, with whatever reverence received, are speedily dragged down into a savage interpretation. The interior tribes of our Indians, and some of the Pacific islanders, flog their gods, when things take an unfavorable turn. The Greek poets did not hesitate to let loose their petulant wit on their deities also. Laomedon, in his anger at Neptune and Apollo, who had built Troy for him, and demanded their price, does not hesitate to menace them that he will cut their ears off.5 Among our Norse forefathers, King Olaf's mode of converting Eyvind to Christianity was to put a pan of glowing coals on his belly, which burst asunder. "Wilt thou now, Eyvind, believe in Christ?" asks Olaf, in excellent faith. Another argument was an adder put into the mouth of the reluctant disciple Rand, who refused to believe.

In the last chapters, we discussed some specific aspects of culture. But the overall condition of humans is a condition of culture, and its development and completion can be described as Religion or Worship. There is always some form of religion, a mix of hope and fear directed toward the unseen—ranging from the superstitious act of nailing a horseshoe to a mast or a doorway, to the songs of the Elders in the Apocalypse. However, religion cannot surpass the state of its followers. Heaven always reflects some aspect of earth. The god of cannibals will be a cannibal, the god of crusaders will be a crusader, and the god of merchants will be a merchant. Throughout history, there have been extraordinary, prophetic souls who are more connected to the world system than to their specific time and place. These individuals proclaim absolute truths that, despite being received with reverence, are quickly misinterpreted in a savage way. The interior tribes of our Native Americans and some Pacific Islanders strike their gods when things go awry. The Greek poets also didn't hesitate to mock their deities. Laomedon, furious with Neptune and Apollo, who had built Troy for him and wanted payment, threatened to cut off their ears. Among our Norse ancestors, King Olaf's method of converting Eyvind to Christianity involved placing a pan of hot coals on his belly, which burst open. "Will you now believe in Christ, Eyvind?" Olaf asks with sincere faith. Another tactic involved putting a snake in the mouth of the unwilling disciple Rand, who refused to believe.

[5]

Iliad, Book xxi. 1. 455.

Iliad, Book 21, Line 455.

Christianity, in the romantic ages, signified European culture,—the grafted or meliorated tree in a crab forest. And to marry a pagan wife or husband, was to marry Beast, and voluntarily to take a step backwards towards the baboon.

Christianity, during the romantic period, represented European culture—like a cultivated or improved tree in a grove of wild crabapple trees. Marrying a pagan partner was seen as marrying a beast and willingly taking a step back towards primitive instincts.

"Hengist had verament
A daughter both fair and gent,
But she was heathen Sarazine,
And Vortigern for love fine
Her took to fere and to wife,
And was cursed in all his life;
For he let Christian wed heathen,
And mixed our blood as flesh and mathen."6
"Hengist truly
Had a daughter who was both beautiful and gentle,
But she was a heathen Sarazine,
And Vortigern, out of true love,
Took her as his companion and wife,
And was cursed throughout his life;
For he allowed a Christian to marry a heathen,
And mixed our blood like flesh and metal."__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
[6]

Moths or worms

Moths or caterpillars

What Gothic mixtures the Christian creed drew from the pagan sources, Richard of Devizes's chronicle of Richard I.'s crusade, in the twelfth century, may show. King Richard taunts God with forsaking him: "O fie! O how unwilling should I be to forsake thee, in so forlorn and dreadful a position, were I thy lord and advocate, as thou art mine. In sooth, my standards will in future be despised, not through my fault, but through thine: in sooth, not through any cowardice of my warfare, art thou thyself, my king and my God conquered, this day, and not Richard thy vassal." The religion of the early English poets is anomalous, so devout and so blasphemous, in the same breath. Such is Chaucer's extraordinary confusion of heaven and earth in the picture of Dido.

What Gothic combinations the Christian faith drew from pagan influences can be seen in Richard of Devizes's account of Richard I's crusade in the twelfth century. King Richard challenges God for abandoning him: "Oh shame! How could I ever leave you in such a desperate and terrifying situation, if I were your lord and protector, as you are mine? Truly, my banners will be looked down upon in the future, not because of any failure on my part, but because of yours: truly, it is not due to any cowardice in my fighting that you, my king and my God, were defeated today, and not Richard your servant." The faith of the early English poets is strange, so deeply devoted yet so blasphemous at the same time. Such is Chaucer's remarkable jumbling of heaven and earth in the portrayal of Dido.

"She was so fair,
So young, so lusty, with her eyen glad,
That if that God that heaven and earthe made
Would have a love for beauty and goodness,
And womanhede, truth, and seemliness,
Whom should he loven but this lady sweet?
There n' is no woman to him half so meet."
 
"She was so beautiful,
So young, so vibrant, with her joyful eyes,
That if the God who created heaven and earth
Had a love for beauty and goodness,
And femininity, truth, and grace,
Who else would He love but this sweet lady?
There is no woman who is half as suitable for Him."

With these grossnesses, we complacently compare our own taste and decorum. We think and speak with more temperance and gradation,—but is not indifferentism as bad as superstition?

With these gross behaviors, we comfortably compare our own taste and manners. We think and speak with more restraint and nuance—but isn't being indifferent just as bad as being superstitious?

We live in a transition period, when the old faiths which comforted nations, and not only so, but made nations, seem to have spent their force. I do not find the religions of men at this moment very creditable to them, but either childish and insignificant, or unmanly and effeminating. The fatal trait is the divorce between religion and morality. Here are know-nothing religions, or churches that proscribe intellect; scortatory religions; slave-holding and slave-trading religions; and, even in the decent populations, idolatries wherein the whiteness of the ritual covers scarlet indulgence. The lover of the old religion complains that our contemporaries, scholars as well as merchants, succumb to a great despair,—have corrupted into a timorous conservatism, and believe in nothing. In our large cities, the population is godless, materialized,—no bond, no fellow-feeling, no enthusiasm. These are not men, but hungers, thirsts, fevers, and appetites walking. How is it people manage to live on,—so aimless as they are? After their peppercorn aims are gained, it seems as if the lime in their bones alone held them together, and not any worthy purpose. There is no faith in the intellectual, none in the moral universe. There is faith in chemistry, in meat, and wine, in wealth, in machinery, in the steam-engine, galvanic battery, turbine-wheels, sewing machines, and in public opinion, but not in divine causes. A silent revolution has loosed the tension of the old religious sects, and, in place of the gravity and permanence of those societies of opinion, they run into freak and extravagance. In creeds never was such levity; witness the heathenisms in Christianity, the periodic "revivals," the Millennium mathematics, the peacock ritualism, the retrogression to Popery, the maundering of Mormons, the squalor of Mesmerism, the deliration of rappings, the rat and mouse revelation, thumps in table-drawers, and black art. The architecture, the music, the prayer, partake of the madness: the arts sink into shift and make-believe. Not knowing what to do, we ape our ancestors; the churches stagger backward to the mummeries of the dark ages. By the irresistible maturing of the general mind, the Christian traditions have lost their hold. The dogma of the mystic offices of Christ being dropped, and he standing on his genius as a moral teacher, 'tis impossible to maintain the old emphasis of his personality; and it recedes, as all persons must, before the sublimity of the moral laws. From this change, and in the momentary absence of any religious genius that could offset the immense material activity, there is a feeling that religion is gone. When Paul Leroux offered his article "Dieu" to the conductor of a leading French journal, he replied, "La question de Dieu manque d'actualité." In Italy, Mr. Gladstone said of the late King of Naples, "it has been a proverb, that he has erected the negation of God into a system of government." In this country, the like stupefaction was in the air, and the phrase "higher law" became a political jibe. What proof of infidelity, like the toleration and propagandism of slavery? What, like the direction of education? What, like the facility of conversion? What, like the externality of churches that once sucked the roots of right and wrong, and now have perished away till they are a speck of whitewash on the wall? What proof of skepticism like the base rate at which the highest mental and moral gifts are held? Let a man attain the highest and broadest culture that any American has possessed, then let him die by sea-storm, railroad collision, or other accident, and all America will acquiesce that the best thing has happened to him; that, after the education has gone far, such is the expensiveness of America, that the best use to put a fine person to, is, to drown him to save his board.

We are in a transitional phase where the old beliefs that once offered comfort to nations and helped shape them seem to have lost their power. I don’t find the current religions very respectable; they seem either childish and trivial or weak and unmanly. The critical issue is the separation of religion from morality. We see ignorant beliefs or churches that discourage intellectual thinking; disreputable religions; religions that support slavery and the slave trade; and even in more respectable communities, practices where the purity of rituals masks immoral indulgences. Admirers of traditional religion lament that our contemporaries, both scholars and businesspeople, fall into despair, becoming overly cautious and believing in nothing. In our big cities, people are godless and materialistic—there’s no connection, no compassion, no enthusiasm. These aren’t people, but mere cravings, desires, and urges on the move. How do they continue to live without purpose? Once they achieve their trivial goals, it seems only the physical structure of their bodies keeps them going, not any meaningful aim. There’s no belief in intellect or moral principles. There’s faith in science, food, wealth, machines, and public opinion, but not in higher causes. A quiet revolution has loosened the grip of traditional religious sects, and instead of the seriousness and stability of those communities, they now indulge in absurdity and extremes. There’s never been so much frivolity in beliefs; just look at the pagan elements in Christianity, the cyclical “revivals,” the obsession with the Millennium, the showy rituals, the regression to Catholicism, the ramblings of Mormons, the chaos of mesmerism, the nonsense of spiritual knockings, and the tricks of charlatans. The arts reflect this madness: architecture, music, and prayer have all turned into shallow performance. In our uncertainty, we imitate our ancestors; churches are regressing to the spectacle of the Dark Ages. Due to the gradual maturation of public thought, Christian traditions have lost their influence. With the dropping of the concept of Christ's mystical roles, and his identity reformulated as a moral teacher, it's impossible to keep the old focus on his personality; it diminishes, just as all individuals must, in the face of the grandeur of moral laws. This shift, along with the lack of any religious inspiration to balance out the overwhelming materialism, creates a sense that religion has vanished. When Paul Leroux submitted his article "Dieu" to the editor of a major French publication, he was told, "La question de Dieu manque d'actualité." In Italy, Mr. Gladstone remarked on the late King of Naples, "it has become a saying that he has made the denial of God a governing principle." In this country, a similar lack of awareness filled the air, and the term "higher law" became a political mockery. What greater evidence of disbelief is there than the acceptance and promotion of slavery? What about the direction of education? What about the ease of conversion? What about the superficiality of churches that once grounded right and wrong, but have now faded to a mere smudge on the wall? What deeper skepticism is there than the low regard for our most exceptional intellectual and moral talents? If a person achieves the greatest education any American has had, then dies from a sea storm, train crash, or some other accident, all of America will agree that it was the best outcome for him; that with such high costs in America, the best way to utilize a remarkable individual is to let him drown to save on expenses.

Another scar of this skepticism is the distrust in human virtue. It is believed by well-dressed proprietors that there is no more virtue than they possess; that the solid portion of society exist for the arts of comfort: that life is an affair to put somewhat between the upper and lower mandibles. How prompt the suggestion of a low motive! Certain patriots in England devoted themselves for years to creating a public opinion that should break down the corn-laws and establish free trade. 'Well,' says the man in the street, 'Cobden got a stipend out of it.' Kossuth fled hither across the ocean to try if he could rouse the New World to a sympathy with European liberty. 'Aye,' says New York, 'he made a handsome thing of it, enough to make him comfortable for life.'

Another sign of this skepticism is the distrust in human goodness. Those in fancy clothes believe that they are the only ones with any real virtue; they think the core of society exists just for comfort; that life is simply about putting food on the table. It's so easy to assume a selfish motive! Some patriots in England spent years trying to shape public opinion to dismantle the corn laws and promote free trade. “Well,” says the average person, “Cobden got paid for that.” Kossuth came over here from across the ocean to see if he could inspire the New World to support European freedom. “Yeah,” says New York, “he made a good amount of money from it, enough to set him up for life.”

See what allowance vice finds in the respectable and well-conditioned class. If a pickpocket intrude into the society of gentlemen, they exert what moral force they have, and he finds himself uncomfortable, and glad to get away. But if an adventurer go through all the forms, procure himself to be elected to a post of trust, as of senator, or president,—though by the same arts as we detest in the house-thief,—the same gentlemen who agree to discountenance the private rogue, will be forward to show civilities and marks of respect to the public one: and no amount of evidence of his crimes will prevent them giving him ovations, complimentary dinners, opening their own houses to him, and priding themselves on his acquaintance. We were not deceived by the professions of the private adventurer,—the louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted our spoons; but we appeal to the sanctified preamble of the messages and proclamations of the public sinner, as the proof of sincerity. It must be that they who pay this homage have said to themselves, On the whole, we don't know about this that you call honesty; a bird in the hand is better.

See how much allowance wrongdoing gets in the respectable and well-off class. If a pickpocket tries to mingle with gentlemen, they use whatever moral authority they have, and he feels uncomfortable and is eager to leave. But if a fraud goes through all the right steps and gets elected to a position of trust, like senator or president—using the same tricks we despise in a house thief—the same gentlemen who refuse to tolerate the private crook will eagerly extend courtesies and show respect to the public one. No amount of proof of his wrongdoings will stop them from throwing him celebrations, hosting fancy dinners for him, opening their homes to him, and taking pride in knowing him. We aren’t fooled by the claims of the private fraud—he could declare his honor all he wants, and we’d still count our spoons carefully. But we point to the grand words in the messages and proclamations of the public wrongdoer as proof of their sincerity. It seems that those who give this respect have convinced themselves that, overall, they don’t really believe in what you call honesty; a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

Even well-disposed, good sort of people are touched with the same infidelity, and for brave, straightforward action, use half-measures and compromises. Forgetful that a little measure is a great error, forgetful that a wise mechanic uses a sharp tool, they go on choosing the dead men of routine. But the official men can in nowise help you in any question of to-day, they deriving entirely from the old dead things. Only those can help in counsel or conduct who did not make a party pledge to defend this or that, but who were appointed by God Almighty, before they came into the world, to stand for this which they uphold.

Even good-hearted, well-meaning people are affected by the same unfaithfulness, and when it comes to brave, straightforward actions, they resort to half-measures and compromises. Forgetting that a small compromise can be a serious mistake, and that a skilled worker uses sharp tools, they continue to rely on the outdated practices of the past. However, the official representatives can’t assist you with any current issues, as they are completely rooted in old, irrelevant concepts. Only those who have not pledged loyalty to this or that party, but were appointed by God before they were born to support what they believe in, can truly offer help in guidance or action.

It has been charged that a want of sincerity in the leading men is a vice general throughout American society. But the multitude of the sick shall not make us deny the existence of health. In spite of our imbecility and terrors, and "universal decay of religion," &c. &c., the moral sense reappears to-day with the same morning newness that has been from of old the fountain of beauty and strength. You say, there is no religion now. 'Tis like saying in rainy weather, there is no sun, when at that moment we are witnessing one of his superlative effects. The religion of the cultivated class now, to be sure, consists in an avoidance of acts and engagements which it was once their religion to assume. But this avoidance will yield spontaneous forms in their due hour. There is a principle which is the basis of things, which all speech aims to say, and all action to evolve, a simple, quiet, undescribed, undescribable presence, dwelling very peacefully in us, our rightful lord: we are not to do, but to let do; not to work, but to be worked upon; and to this homage there is a consent of all thoughtful and just men in all ages and conditions. To this sentiment belong vast and sudden enlargements of power. 'Tis remarkable that our faith in ecstasy consists with total inexperience of it. It is the order of the world to educate with accuracy the senses and the understanding; and the enginery at work to draw out these powers in priority, no doubt, has its office. But we are never without a hint that these powers are mediate and servile, and that we are one day to deal with real being,—essences with essences. Even the fury of material activity has some results friendly to moral health. The energetic action of the times develops individualism, and the religious appear isolated. I esteem this a step in the right direction. Heaven deals with us on no representative system. Souls are not saved in bundles. The Spirit saith to the man, 'How is it with thee? thee personally? is it well? is it ill?' For a great nature, it is a happiness to escape a religious training,—religion of character is so apt to be invaded. Religion must always be a crab fruit: it cannot be grafted and keep its wild beauty. "I have seen," said a traveller who had known the extremes of society, "I have seen human nature in all its forms, it is everywhere the same, but the wilder it is, the more virtuous."

It has been claimed that a lack of sincerity among the leading figures is a widespread issue in American society. But the many who are sick should not make us deny the existence of health. Despite our weaknesses and fears, and the "universal decay of religion," etc., the moral sense emerges today with the same fresh vibrancy that has historically been the source of beauty and strength. You say there is no religion now. That's like saying during rainy weather that there is no sun, while at that moment we are witnessing one of his greatest effects. The religion of the educated class today certainly consists of avoiding actions and commitments that once defined their faith. However, this avoidance will naturally evolve into new forms in due time. There is a principle that underpins everything, which all speech aims to express, and all actions strive to reveal—a simple, quiet, indescribable presence that peacefully resides within us, our rightful ruler: we are not meant to act, but to allow things to happen; not to work, but to be worked upon; and this recognition is accepted by all thoughtful and fair-minded people throughout history and across all circumstances. To this sentiment belong vast and sudden expansions of power. It’s remarkable that our faith in ecstasy coexists with total lack of experience of it. It is the nature of the world to accurately train our senses and understanding, and the mechanisms at work to develop these abilities in priority surely have their role. But we always have a hint that these powers are merely tools, and that one day we will engage with real existence—essences engaging with essences. Even the intensity of material activity has results that favor moral well-being. The vigorous actions of our times cultivate individualism, and the spiritually minded appear more isolated. I see this as a step in the right direction. Heaven does not operate on a representative system. Souls are not saved in groups. The Spirit asks each person, 'How are you? How is it with you personally? Is it good? Is it bad?' For a great nature, it is a blessing to escape a religious training—character-based religion is so easily compromised. Religion must always be like a wild fruit: it cannot be grafted and retain its natural beauty. "I have seen," said a traveler who had witnessed the extremes of society, "I have seen human nature in all its forms; it is the same everywhere, but the wilder it is, the more virtuous."

We say, the old forms of religion decay, and that a skepticism devastates the community. I do not think it can be cured or stayed by any modification of theologic creeds, much less by theologic discipline. The cure for false theology is motherwit. Forget your books and traditions, and obey your moral perceptions at this hour. That which is signified by the words "moral" and "spiritual," is a lasting essence, and, with whatever illusions we have loaded them, will certainly bring back the words, age after age, to their ancient meaning. I know no words that mean so much. In our definitions, we grope after the spiritual by describing it as invisible. The true meaning of spiritual is real; that law which executes itself, which works without means, and which cannot be conceived as not existing. Men talk of "mere morality,"—which is much as if one should say, 'poor God, with nobody to help him.' I find the omnipresence and the almightiness in the reaction of every atom in Nature. I can best indicate by examples those reactions by which every part of Nature replies to the purpose of the actor,—beneficently to the good, penally to the bad. Let us replace sentimentalism by realism, and dare to uncover those simple and terrible laws which, be they seen or unseen, pervade and govern.

We say that old forms of religion are fading away, and that skepticism is harming the community. I don’t believe it can be fixed or stopped by changing theological beliefs, let alone by religious regulations. The solution for false theology is common sense. Forget your books and traditions, and follow your moral instincts right now. What we mean by "moral" and "spiritual" is a lasting essence, and despite any illusions we’ve put upon these words, they will inevitably return to their original meaning, age after age. I don’t know any words that hold as much significance. In our definitions, we search for the spiritual by calling it invisible. The true meaning of spiritual is real; it’s that law which enforces itself, which operates without tools, and which cannot be imagined as not existing. People talk about "mere morality," which is like saying, 'poor God, with no one to help him.' I see the omnipresence and omnipotence in the reaction of every atom in Nature. I can best illustrate those reactions through examples showing how every part of Nature responds to the intent of the doer—supportively to the good, penalizing to the bad. Let’s replace sentimentalism with realism and dare to reveal those simple and powerful laws that, whether seen or unseen, permeate and govern everything.

Every man takes care that his neighbor shall not cheat him. But a day comes when he begins to care that he do not cheat his neighbor. Then all goes well. He has changed his market-cart into a chariot of the sun. What a day dawns, when we have taken to heart the doctrine of faith! to prefer, as a better investment, being to doing; being to seeming; logic to rhythm and to display; the year to the day; the life to the year; character to performance;—and have come to know, that justice will be done us; and, if our genius is slow, the term will be long.

Every person makes sure that their neighbor won’t cheat them. But there comes a time when they start to care about not cheating their neighbor. That’s when everything falls into place. They have transformed their market cart into a chariot of the sun. What a bright day it is when we truly embrace the principle of faith! We choose, as a smarter investment, being over doing; being over appearing; reasoning over rhythm and flash; the year over the day; life over the year; character over performance; and we come to understand that justice will be served; and if our talent is slow, the waiting will be long.

'Tis certain that worship stands in some commanding relation to the health of man, and to his highest powers, so as to be, in some manner, the source of intellect. All the great ages have been ages of belief. I mean, when there was any extraordinary power of performance, when great national movements began, when arts appeared, when heroes existed, when poems were made, the human soul was in earnest, and had fixed its thoughts on spiritual verities, with as strict a grasp as that of the hands on the sword, or the pencil, or the trowel. It is true that genius takes its rise out of the mountains of rectitude; that all beauty and power which men covet, are somehow born out of that Alpine district; that any extraordinary degree of beauty in man or woman involves a moral charm. Thus, I think, we very slowly admit in another man a higher degree of moral sentiment than our own,—a finer conscience, more impressionable, or, which marks minuter degrees; an ear to hear acuter notes of right and wrong, than we can. I think we listen suspiciously and very slowly to any evidence to that point. But, once satisfied of such superiority, we set no limit to our expectation of his genius. For such persons are nearer to the secret of God than others; are bathed by sweeter waters; they hear notices, they see visions, where others are vacant. We believe that holiness confers a certain insight, because not by our private, but by our public force, can we share and know the nature of things.

It's clear that worship is closely linked to human health and our highest abilities, serving as a source of intellect. Throughout history, the great ages have been marked by belief. During times of exceptional achievement, when significant national movements emerged, when the arts flourished, when heroes rose, and when poetry was created, the human spirit was engaged and focused on spiritual truths with as much determination as one would grip a sword, a pencil, or a trowel. It's true that genius originates from a foundation of integrity; all the beauty and power that people desire somehow stem from that high ground. Any remarkable beauty in a person is tied to a moral allure. Thus, we tend to gradually recognize a higher level of moral awareness in others— a more refined conscience, more sensitive feelings, or finer distinctions; an ability to perceive sharper notes of right and wrong than we can. We tend to be cautious and slow to accept any signs of this. However, once we acknowledge such superiority, we have no limits on our expectations of their talent. For these individuals are closer to the essence of the divine than others; they are surrounded by richer experiences; they receive insights and see visions where others find emptiness. We believe that holiness grants a certain understanding, as it’s only through our shared experiences, rather than individual ones, that we can connect with and comprehend the nature of things.

There is an intimate interdependence of intellect and morals. Given the equality of two intellects,—which will form the most reliable judgments, the good, or the bad hearted? "The heart has its arguments, with which the understanding is not acquainted." For the heart is at once aware of the state of health or disease, which is the controlling state, that is, of sanity or of insanity, prior, of course, to all question of the ingenuity of arguments, the amount of facts, or the elegance of rhetoric. So intimate is this alliance of mind and heart, that talent uniformly sinks with character. The bias of errors of principle carries away men into perilous courses, as soon as their will does not control their passion or talent. Hence the extraordinary blunders, and final wrong head, into which men spoiled by ambition usually fall. Hence the remedy for all blunders, the cure of blindness, the cure of crime, is love. "As much love, so much mind," said the Latin proverb. The superiority that has no superior; the redeemer and instructor of souls, as it is their primal essence, is love.

There’s a deep connection between intellect and morals. When two minds are equal, which one will make the better judgments: the kind-hearted or the cruel? "The heart has its reasons that the mind doesn’t understand." The heart knows whether it’s healthy or unhealthy, which is crucial—whether it’s sane or insane—before any discussion about the cleverness of arguments, the amount of evidence, or the beauty of rhetoric. This bond between mind and heart is so strong that talent often declines along with character. Faulty principles can lead people down dangerous paths as soon as their will can’t control their emotions or abilities. This is why people driven by ambition often make serious mistakes. Therefore, the solution to all mistakes, the cure for ignorance and wrongdoing, is love. "As much love, so much mind," says the Latin proverb. Love is the ultimate strength, the savior and teacher of souls, as it is at their very core.

The moral must be the measure of health. If your eye is on the eternal, your intellect will grow, and your opinions and actions will have a beauty which no learning or combined advantages of other men can rival. The moment of your loss of faith, and acceptance of the lucrative standard, will be marked in the pause, or solstice of genius, the sequent retrogression, and the inevitable loss of attraction to other minds. The vulgar are sensible of the change in you, and of your descent, though they clap you on the back, and congratulate you on your increased common sense.

The moral should be the standard for health. If you're focused on the eternal, your intellect will expand, and your views and actions will possess a beauty that no amount of education or advantages from others can compete with. The moment you lose your faith and embrace the tempting standard will be evident in the pause or standstill of your creativity, the subsequent decline, and the unavoidable loss of appeal to others. The ordinary people can sense the change in you and your decline, even though they pat you on the back and praise you for your newfound common sense.

Our recent culture has been in natural science. We have learned the manners of the sun and of the moon, of the rivers and the rains, of the mineral and elemental kingdoms, of plants and animals. Man has learned to weigh the sun, and its weight neither loses nor gains. The path of a star, the moment of an eclipse, can be determined to the fraction of a second. Well, to him the book of History, the book of love, the lures of passion, and the commandments of duty are opened: and the next lesson taught, is, the continuation of the inflexible law of matter into the subtile kingdom of will, and of thought; that, if, in sidereal ages, gravity and projection keep their craft, and the ball never loses its way in its wild path through space,—a secreter gravitation, a secreter projection, rule not less tyrannically in human history, and keep the balance of power from age to age unbroken. For, though the new element of freedom and an individual has been admitted, yet the primordial atoms are prefigured and predetermined to moral issues, are in search of justice, and ultimate right is done. Religion or worship is the attitude of those who see this unity, intimacy, and sincerity; who see that, against all appearances, the nature of things works for truth and right forever.

Our modern culture has focused on natural science. We’ve discovered how the sun and the moon work, how rivers and rain behave, and we’ve studied minerals, elements, plants, and animals. Humans can measure the sun’s mass, and that measurement stays constant. We can predict a star's path or the timing of an eclipse down to a fraction of a second. Now, the books of History, love, desire, and duty are open to us; the next lesson is about how the unyielding laws of matter extend into the subtle realms of will and thought. Just as gravity and motion maintain their course over cosmic ages, a hidden force and hidden motion rules human history just as strictly, keeping the balance of power intact through the ages. Even though we’ve introduced the new element of freedom and individual choice, the fundamental forces are aligned with moral outcomes, seeking justice, ensuring that ultimate right prevails. Religion or worship reflects the mindset of those who recognize this unity, closeness, and sincerity; those who perceive that, despite appearances, the essence of things perpetually works toward truth and justice.

'Tis a short sight to limit our faith in laws to those of gravity, of chemistry, of botany, and so forth. Those laws do not stop where our eyes lose them, but push the same geometry and chemistry up into the invisible plane of social and rational life, so that, look where we will, in a boy's game, or in the strifes of races, a perfect reaction, a perpetual judgment keeps watch and ward. And this appears in a class of facts which concerns all men, within and above their creeds.

It's shortsighted to limit our belief in laws to just those of gravity, chemistry, botany, and so on. These laws don't stop where our vision fails; they extend the same principles of geometry and chemistry into the invisible realm of social and rational life. So, no matter where we look—in a child's game or in the conflicts between races—a perfect reaction and a constant judgment are always keeping watch. This is evident in a class of facts that matter to everyone, regardless of their beliefs.

Shallow men believe in luck, believe in circumstances: It was somebody's name, or he happened to be there at the time, or, it was so then, and another day it would have been otherwise. Strong men believe in cause and effect. The man was born to do it, and his father was born to be the father of him and of this deed, and, by looking narrowly, you shall see there was no luck in the matter, but it was all a problem in arithmetic, or an experiment in chemistry. The curve of the flight of the moth is preordained, and all things go by number, rule, and weight.

Shallow men believe in luck and circumstances: it was just someone’s name, or he happened to be there at that moment, or it was that way then, and another day it could have been different. Strong men believe in cause and effect. The man was meant to do it, and his father was meant to be his father and to inspire that action, and if you look closely, you’ll see there was no luck involved; it was all just a math problem or an experiment in chemistry. The path of the moth’s flight is predetermined, and everything follows numbers, rules, and weights.

Skepticism is unbelief in cause and effect. A man does not see, that, as he eats, so he thinks: as he deals, so he is, and so he appears; he does not see, that his son is the son of his thoughts and of his actions; that fortunes are not exceptions but fruits; that relation and connection are not somewhere and sometimes, but everywhere and always; no miscellany, no exemption, no anomaly,—but method, and an even web; and what comes out, that was put in. As we are, so we do; and as we do, so is it done to us; we are the builders of our fortunes; cant and lying and the attempt to secure a good which does not belong to us, are, once for all, balked and vain. But, in the human mind, this tie of fate is made alive. The law is the basis of the human mind. In us, it is inspiration; out there in Nature, we see its fatal strength. We call it the moral sentiment.

Skepticism is doubt about cause and effect. A person doesn’t realize that how he eats influences how he thinks; how he acts reflects who he is and how he appears; he doesn’t see that his son is shaped by his thoughts and actions; that fortunes aren’t exceptions but consequences; that relationships and connections aren’t occasional but constant; there’s no randomness, no exemptions, no anomalies—only method and a consistent pattern; what comes out is what was put in. As we are, so we act; and as we act, so it is done to us; we are the creators of our fortunes; empty talk and deceit and the attempt to gain what isn't rightfully ours ultimately fail. Yet, in the human mind, this connection to fate comes alive. The law is the foundation of the human mind. Within us, it’s inspiration; out there in nature, we see its undeniable strength. We call it the moral sentiment.

We owe to the Hindoo Scriptures a definition of Law, which compares well with any in our Western books. "Law it is, which is without name, or color, or hands, or feet; which is smallest of the least, and largest of the large; all, and knowing all things; which hears without ears, sees without eyes, moves without feet, and seizes without hands."

We owe the Hindu scriptures a definition of law that stands up to any in our Western texts. "Law is that which has no name, color, hands, or feet; which is the smallest of the small and the largest of the large; everything and knows everything; which hears without ears, sees without eyes, moves without feet, and grasps without hands."

If any reader tax me with using vague and traditional phrases, let me suggest to him, by a few examples, what kind of a trust this is, and how real. Let me show him that the dice are loaded; that the colors are fast, because they are the native colors of the fleece; that the globe is a battery, because every atom is a magnet; and that the police and sincerity of the Universe are secured by God's delegating his divinity to every particle; that there is no room for hypocrisy, no margin for choice.

If any reader accuses me of using vague and outdated phrases, let me illustrate with a few examples what kind of trust this really is and how genuine it is. Let me show you that the dice are rigged; that the colors are permanent because they come from the natural fleece; that the globe acts like a battery because every atom is a magnet; and that the order and honesty of the Universe are guaranteed by God sharing His divinity with every particle; that there is no space for hypocrisy, no room for choice.

The countryman leaving his native village, for the first time, and going abroad, finds all his habits broken up. In a new nation and language, his sect, as Quaker, or Lutheran, is lost. What! it is not then necessary to the order and existence of society? He misses this, and the commanding eye of his neighborhood, which held him to decorum. This is the peril of New York, of New Orleans, of London, of Paris, to young men. But after a little experience, he makes the discovery that there are no large cities,—none large enough to hide in; that the censors of action are as numerous and as near in Paris, as in Littleton or Portland; that the gossip is as prompt and vengeful. There is no concealment, and, for each offence, a several vengeance; that, reaction, or nothing for nothing, or, things are as broad as they are long, is not a rule for Littleton or Portland, but for the Universe.

The country guy leaving his hometown for the first time and traveling abroad finds that all his routines are disrupted. In a new country and language, his religious identity, whether he's a Quaker or a Lutheran, fades away. What? It's not essential for the order and existence of society? He feels this loss, along with the watchful eyes of his neighbors that kept him in check. This is the danger in New York, New Orleans, London, and Paris for young men. But after some time, he realizes that there are no big cities—none big enough to hide in; that the critics of behavior are just as many and just as close in Paris as in Littleton or Portland; that the gossip is just as quick and unforgiving. There’s no hiding, and for every misstep, there's a specific retribution; that the idea of reaction, or nothing for nothing, or, things are as broad as they are long, isn't just a rule for Littleton or Portland, but for the entire universe.

We cannot spare the coarsest muniment of virtue. We are disgusted by gossip; yet it is of importance to keep the angels in their proprieties. The smallest fly will draw blood, and gossip is a weapon impossible to exclude from the privatest, highest, selectest. Nature created a police of many ranks. God has delegated himself to a million deputies. From these low external penalties, the scale ascends. Next come the resentments, the fears, which injustice calls out; then, the false relations in which the offender is put to other men; and the reaction of his fault on himself, in the solitude and devastation of his mind.

We can't overlook the roughest evidence of virtue. We're put off by gossip, but it's crucial to maintain proper behavior among the angels. Even the tiniest fly can cause harm, and gossip is a weapon that can't be kept out of even the most private and exclusive circles. Nature has established a hierarchy of enforcement. God has appointed countless deputies. From these minor external consequences, the severity increases. Next come the feelings of resentment and fear that injustice brings out; then, the false perceptions others form about the offender; and finally, the way their wrongdoing affects them personally, leading to isolation and turmoil in their mind.

You cannot hide any secret. If the artist succor his flagging spirits by opium or wine, his work will characterize itself as the effect of opium or wine. If you make a picture or a statue, it sets the beholder in that state of mind you had, when you made it. If you spend for show, on building, or gardening, or on pictures, or on equipages, it will so appear. We are all physiognomists and penetrators of character, and things themselves are detective. If you follow the suburban fashion in building a sumptuous-looking house for a little money, it will appear to all eyes as a cheap dear house. There is no privacy that cannot be penetrated. No secret can be kept in the civilized world. Society is a masked ball, where every one hides his real character, and reveals it by hiding. If a man wish to conceal anything he carries, those whom he meets know that he conceals somewhat, and usually know what he conceals. Is it otherwise if there be some belief or some purpose he would bury in his breast? 'Tis as hard to hide as fire. He is a strong man who can hold down his opinion. A man cannot utter two or three sentences, without disclosing to intelligent ears precisely where he stands in life and thought, namely, whether in the kingdom of the senses and the understanding, or, in that of ideas and imagination, in the realm of intuitions and duty. People seem not to see that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character. We can only see what we are, and if we misbehave we suspect others. The fame of Shakspeare or of Voltaire, of Thomas à Kempis, or of Bonaparte, characterizes those who give it. As gas-light is found to be the best nocturnal police, so the universe protects itself by pitiless publicity.

You can't hide any secret. If an artist boosts their dwindling spirits with opium or wine, their work will reflect that influence. When you create a painting or a sculpture, it captures the mindset you had while making it. If you spend money to impress, whether on buildings, gardens, artwork, or fancy cars, it will be obvious. We all read faces and understand character, and things themselves reveal the truth. If you follow the trend of building a lavish-looking house on a budget, everyone will see it as a cheap yet expensive house. There’s no privacy that can’t be uncovered. No secret can be kept in today's world. Society is like a masked ball where everyone hides their true character and reveals it through that disguise. If someone tries to hide something they carry, those they encounter will sense that something is being hidden and will often know what it is. It's no different if someone has a belief or purpose they wish to keep buried in their heart; it's as hard to conceal as fire. Only a strong person can suppress their opinions. A person can’t say just a few sentences without revealing to attentive listeners exactly where they stand in life and thought—whether they exist in the realm of senses and understanding or in the world of ideas, imagination, intuitions, and duty. People often don’t realize that their views of the world also confess their character. We can only perceive what we are, and if we act poorly, we tend to suspect others. The fame of Shakespeare or Voltaire, of Thomas à Kempis or Bonaparte, reflects on those who admire them. Just as gas lighting has proven to be the best night watch, the universe protects itself through relentless transparency.

Each must be armed—not necessarily with musket and pike. Happy, if, seeing these, he can feel that he has better muskets and pikes in his energy and constancy. To every creature is his own weapon, however skilfully concealed from himself, a good while. His work is sword and shield. Let him accuse none, let him injure none. The way to mend the bad world, is to create the right world. Here is a low political economy plotting to cut the throat of foreign competition, and establish our own;—excluding others by force, or making war on them; or, by cunning tariffs, giving preference to worse wares of ours. But the real and lasting victories are those of peace, and not of war. The way to conquer the foreign artisan, is, not to kill him, but to beat his work. And the Crystal Palaces and World Fairs, with their committees and prizes on all kinds of industry, are the result of this feeling. The American workman who strikes ten blows with his hammer, whilst the foreign workman only strikes one, is as really vanquishing that foreigner, as if the blows were aimed at and told on his person. I look on that man as happy, who, when there is question of success, looks into his work for a reply, not into the market, not into opinion, not into patronage. In every variety of human employment, in the mechanical and in the fine arts, in navigation, in farming, in legislating, there are among the numbers who do their task perfunctorily, as we say, or just to pass, and as badly as they dare,—there are the working-men, on whom the burden of the business falls,—those who love work, and love to see it rightly done, who finish their task for its own sake; and the state and the world is happy, that has the most of such finishers. The world will always do justice at last to such finishers: it cannot otherwise. He who has acquired the ability, may wait securely the occasion of making it felt and appreciated, and know that it will not loiter. Men talk as if victory were something fortunate. Work is victory. Wherever work is done, victory is obtained. There is no chance, and no blanks. You want but one verdict: if you have your own, you are secure of the rest. And yet, if witnesses are wanted, witnesses are near. There was never a man born so wise or good, but one or more companions came into the world with him, who delight in his faculty, and report it. I cannot see without awe, that no man thinks alone, and no man acts alone, but the divine assessors who came up with him into life,—now under one disguise, now under another,—like a police in citizens' clothes, walk with him, step for step, through all the kingdom of time.

Each person must be prepared—not necessarily with a gun and a spear. It’s great if, when seeing these, he can realize that he has better tools in his energy and perseverance. Every individual has their own means, even if it’s hidden from themselves for some time. Their work is their weapon. Let them blame no one, and let them harm no one. The way to fix the flawed world is to create the right one. There is a misguided political agenda trying to crush foreign competition and promote our own; whether by force or warfare, or by clever tariffs that favor our inferior products. But true and lasting victories come from peace, not war. The way to outdo the foreign worker is not to defeat him, but to outperform his work. The exhibitions and international expos celebrating various industries reflect this mindset. The American worker who strikes ten times with his hammer while the foreign worker strikes once is truly defeating that foreigner, just as if those strikes were directed at him. I consider the person who, when it comes to success, looks to their work for answers—not to the market, public opinion, or favoritism—as truly fortunate. In every field of human endeavor, both in trades and the arts, in sailing, farming, and governance, among those who go through the motions or try to do as little as possible, there are hardworking individuals. These are the people who love their work and take pride in doing it well, finishing tasks for their own satisfaction; a society and a world are better off when they have many of these dedicated workers. The world will ultimately recognize the contributions of such individuals; it has no choice. Those who have gained their skills can confidently await the opportunity to showcase them, knowing that recognition will come. People often speak as if victory is merely a matter of luck. But work is victory. Wherever work is accomplished, victory follows. There’s no randomness or voids. You need only one affirmation: if you possess your own, you can be assured of the rest. Yet, if witnesses are needed, they’re always close by. No one is born so wise or good that several companions didn’t enter the world alongside him, appreciating his talents and spreading the word. I cannot help but feel a sense of wonder that no one thinks alone and no one acts alone; the divine counterparts who journeyed with him into existence—now in one guise, now in another—like plainclothes officers, walk beside him, step for step, through all of time.

This reaction, this sincerity is the property of all things. To make our word or act sublime, we must make it real. It is our system that counts, not the single word or unsupported action. Use what language you will, you can never say anything but what you are. What I am, and what I think, is conveyed to you, in spite of my efforts to hold it back. What I am has been secretly conveyed from me to another, whilst I was vainly making up my mind to tell him it. He has heard from me what I never spoke.

This reaction, this honesty is inherent in everything. To make our words or actions truly impactful, we need to make them genuine. It's our overall approach that matters, not just a single word or unbacked action. No matter what language you choose, you can only express who you really are. What I am and what I think reach you, even if I'm trying to keep it hidden. What I am has been quietly communicated from me to someone else, while I was foolishly deciding how to express it. He has understood things from me that I never actually said.

As men get on in life, they acquire a love for sincerity, and somewhat less solicitude to be lulled or amused. In the progress of the character, there is an increasing faith in the moral sentiment, and a decreasing faith in propositions. Young people admire talents, and particular excellences. As we grow older, we value total powers and effects, as the spirit, or quality of the man. We have another sight, and a new standard; an insight which disregards what is done for the eye, and pierces to the doer; an ear which hears not what men say, but hears what they do not say.

As men get older, they develop a deeper appreciation for honesty and care less about being entertained. Throughout the development of their character, they increasingly trust moral feelings and become less focused on arguments. Young people admire skills and certain traits, but as we age, we appreciate overall abilities and their impact as the essence of a person. We gain a different perspective and a new standard; an understanding that looks beyond appearances and sees the person behind the actions, and an ear that listens not just to what people say, but also to what remains unsaid.

There was a wise, devout man who is called, in the Catholic Church, St. Philip Neri, of whom many anecdotes touching his discernment and benevolence are told at Naples and Rome. Among the nuns in a convent not far from Rome, one had appeared, who laid claim to certain rare gifts of inspiration and prophecy, and the abbess advised the Holy Father, at Rome, of the wonderful powers shown by her novice. The Pope did not well know what to make of these new claims, and Philip coming in from a journey, one day, he consulted him. Philip undertook to visit the nun, and ascertain her character. He threw himself on his mule, all travel-soiled as he was, and hastened through the mud and mire to the distant convent. He told the abbess the wishes of his Holiness, and begged her to summon the nun without delay. The nun was sent for, and, as soon as she came into the apartment, Philip stretched out his leg all bespattered with mud, and desired her to draw off his boots. The young nun, who had become the object of much attention and respect, drew back with anger, and refused the office: Philip ran out of doors, mounted his mule, and returned instantly to the Pope; "Give yourself no uneasiness, Holy Father, any longer: here is no miracle, for here is no humility."

There was a wise and devoted man known in the Catholic Church as St. Philip Neri, about whom many stories of his discernment and kindness are told in Naples and Rome. In a convent not far from Rome, there was a nun who claimed to have unusual gifts of inspiration and prophecy, and the abbess informed the Holy Father in Rome about the extraordinary abilities shown by her novice. The Pope wasn’t sure how to respond to these new claims, so when Philip returned from a journey one day, he consulted him. Philip agreed to visit the nun and evaluate her character. He hopped onto his mule, all dirty from travel, and made his way through the mud to the distant convent. He informed the abbess of the Holy Father's wishes and asked her to call the nun right away. The nun was summoned, and as soon as she entered the room, Philip stretched out his leg, covered in mud, and asked her to take off his boots. The young nun, who was the center of much attention and respect, pulled back in anger and refused. Philip went outside, got back on his mule, and quickly returned to the Pope. "Don't worry anymore, Holy Father: there is no miracle here, as there is no humility."

We need not much mind what people please to say, but what they must say; what their natures say, though their busy, artful, Yankee understandings try to hold back, and choke that word, and to articulate something different. If we will sit quietly,—what they ought to say is said, with their will, or against their will. We do not care for you, let us pretend what we will:—we are always looking through you to the dim dictator behind you. Whilst your habit or whim chatters, we civilly and impatiently wait until that wise superior shall speak again. Even children are not deceived by the false reasons which their parents give in answer to their questions, whether touching natural facts, or religion, or persons. When the parent, instead of thinking how it really is, puts them off with a traditional or a hypocritical answer, the children perceive that it is traditional or hypocritical. To a sound constitution the defect of another is at once manifest: and the marks of it are only concealed from us by our own dislocation. An anatomical observer remarks, that the sympathies of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, tell at last on the face, and on all its features. Not only does our beauty waste, but it leaves word how it went to waste. Physiognomy and phrenology are not new sciences, but declarations of the soul that it is aware of certain new sources of information. And now sciences of broader scope are starting up behind these. And so for ourselves, it is really of little importance what blunders in statement we make, so only we make no wilful departures from the truth. How a man's truth comes to mind, long after we have forgotten all his words! How it comes to us in silent hours, that truth is our only armor in all passages of life and death! Wit is cheap, and anger is cheap; but if you cannot argue or explain yourself to the other party, cleave to the truth against me, against thee, and you gain a station from which you cannot be dislodged. The other party will forget the words that you spoke, but the part you took continues to plead for you.

We shouldn’t worry too much about what people choose to say, but rather what they have to say; what comes from their true selves, even though their busy, clever, Yankee minds try to suppress it, twist it, and say something else. If we sit quietly—what they should be saying will eventually come out, whether they want it to or not. We don’t really care about you; let’s pretend otherwise: we’re always looking beyond you to the vague authority behind you. While your habits or whims chatter on, we politely and impatiently wait for that wiser voice to speak again. Even children aren’t fooled by the excuses their parents give when they ask questions about natural facts, religion, or people. When a parent avoids the truth with a traditional or insincere answer, children quickly realize it’s traditional or insincere. To someone with clear judgment, another's flaws are obvious; we only overlook them due to our own distortions. An anatomical observer notes that the health of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis eventually reveals itself in the face and its features. Not only does our beauty fade, but it also shows how it deteriorated. Physiognomy and phrenology aren’t new sciences; they’re affirmations that the soul is aware of certain new sources of information. And now, broader sciences are emerging behind these. For us personally, it's really of little importance what mistakes we make in our statements, as long as we don’t willfully stray from the truth. How a man's truth lingers in our minds long after we’ve forgotten all his words! How it comes to us in quiet moments, reminding us that truth is our only defense in all matters of life and death! Wit is easy, and anger is easy; but if you can’t argue or explain yourself to the other person, hold on to the truth—against me, against you—and you’ll find a position that can’t be shaken. The other person will forget the words you spoke, but the stance you took will continue to advocate for you.

Why should I hasten to solve every riddle which life offers me? I am well assured that the Questioner, who brings me so many problems, will bring the answers also in due time. Very rich, very potent, very cheerful Giver that he is, he shall have it all his own way, for me. Why should I give up my thought, because I cannot answer an objection to it? Consider only, whether it remains in my life the same it was. That only which we have within, can we see without. If we meet no gods, it is because we harbor none. If there is grandeur in you, you will find grandeur in porters and sweeps. He only is rightly immortal, to whom all things are immortal. I have read somewhere, that none is accomplished, so long as any are incomplete; that the happiness of one cannot consist with the misery of any other.

Why should I rush to solve every riddle that life throws at me? I trust that the Questioner, who presents me with so many challenges, will eventually provide the answers as well. He is a very generous, powerful, and cheerful Giver, and I’m happy to let him do things his way. Why should I abandon my thoughts just because I can’t counter an objection to them? Just think about whether my life remains the same as it was. We can only see what we have inside ourselves reflected in the outside world. If we don’t encounter any gods, it’s because we don’t hold any within us. If you possess greatness, you’ll find greatness in everyone, even in porters and street cleaners. Only those who see everything as immortal are truly immortal themselves. I once read that no one is complete as long as anyone is incomplete; that one person's happiness cannot exist alongside another's misery.

The Buddhists say, "No seed will die:" every seed will grow. Where is the service which can escape its remuneration? What is vulgar, and the essence of all vulgarity, but the avarice of reward? 'Tis the difference of artisan and artist, of talent and genius, of sinner and saint. The man whose eyes are nailed not on the nature of his act, but on the wages, whether it be money, or office, or fame,—is almost equally low. He is great, whose eyes are opened to see that the reward of actions cannot be escaped, because he is transformed into his action, and taketh its nature, which bears its own fruit, like every other tree. A great man cannot be hindered of the effect of his act, because it is immediate. The genius of life is friendly to the noble, and in the dark brings them friends from far. Fear God, and where you go, men shall think they walk in hallowed cathedrals.

The Buddhists say, "No seed will die:" every seed will grow. Where is the service that can avoid its reward? What is common, and the essence of all commonness, but the greed for reward? It's the difference between an artisan and an artist, between talent and genius, between a sinner and a saint. The person whose focus is not on the nature of their actions but on the rewards, whether it's money, a position, or fame, is almost equally low. A great person sees that the outcome of their actions is inescapable because they become part of their actions, which have inherent qualities that produce their own results, just like any other tree. A truly great person cannot be prevented from reaping the benefits of their actions because these effects are immediate. The essence of life supports the noble and in times of darkness brings them friends from afar. Respect God, and wherever you go, people will feel like they're walking in sacred spaces.

And so I look on those sentiments which make the glory of the human being, love, humility, faith, as being also the intimacy of Divinity in the atoms; and, that, as soon as the man is right, assurances and previsions emanate from the interior of his body and his mind; as, when flowers reach their ripeness, incense exhales from them, and, as a beautiful atmosphere is generated from the planet by the averaged emanations from all its rocks and soils.

And so I view those feelings that represent the greatness of humanity—love, humility, faith—as expressions of the divine within us. Once a person is aligned with what’s right, confidence and insights flow from deep within their body and mind, just like how flowers release fragrance when they bloom, or how a beautiful atmosphere is created on Earth from the combined emissions of its rocks and soils.

Thus man is made equal to every event. He can face danger for the right. A poor, tender, painful body, he can run into flame or bullets or pestilence, with duty for his guide. He feels the insurance of a just employment. I am not afraid of accident, as long as I am in my place. It is strange that superior persons should not feel that they have some better resistance against cholera, than avoiding green peas and salads. Life is hardly respectable,—is it? if it has no generous, guaranteeing task, no duties or affections, that constitute a necessity of existing. Every man's task is his life-preserver. The conviction that his work is dear to God and cannot be spared, defends him. The lightning-rod that disarms the cloud of its threat is his body in its duty. A high aim reacts on the means, on the days, on the organs of the body. A high aim is curative, as well as arnica. "Napoleon," says Goethe, "visited those sick of the plague, in order to prove that the man who could vanquish fear, could vanquish the plague also; and he was right. 'Tis incredible what force the will has in such cases: it penetrates the body, and puts it in a state of activity, which repels all hurtful influences; whilst fear invites them."

So, a person is made equal to any situation. They can confront danger for what's right. Even with a weak and painful body, they can run into fire or bullets or disease, guided by their sense of duty. They trust in the assurance that comes from meaningful work. I’m not afraid of accidents as long as I’m in the right place. It’s odd that those who are more capable don’t realize they have better defenses against cholera than just avoiding green peas and salads. Life isn’t very respectable, is it? If it lacks a generous purpose, with duties and relationships that make living necessary. Each person’s work is their life preserver. The belief that their efforts are valuable to God and essential protects them. The lightning rod that neutralizes the storm's threat is their body in doing its duty. A noble goal influences everything—it affects our methods, our days, and our physical well-being. A lofty aim is healing, just like arnica. "Napoleon," says Goethe, "visited those suffering from the plague to show that the person who conquers fear can also conquer the plague; and he was correct. It’s unbelievable how powerful the will can be in such situations: it penetrates the body and puts it into a state of readiness that repels harmful influences, while fear attracts them."

It is related of William of Orange, that, whilst he was besieging a town on the continent, a gentleman sent to him on public business came to his camp, and, learning that the King was before the walls, he ventured to go where he was. He found him directing the operation of his gunners, and, having explained his errand, and received his answer, the King said, "Do you not know, sir, that every moment you spend here is at the risk of your life?" "I run no more risk," replied the gentleman, "than your Majesty." "Yes," said the King, "but my duty brings me here, and yours does not." In a few minutes, a cannon-ball fell on the spot, and the gentleman was killed.

It’s said that William of Orange, while he was besieging a town on the continent, had a gentleman sent to him on official business arrive at his camp. Upon finding out that the King was at the walls, he decided to approach him. He found the King directing his gunners, and after explaining his purpose and receiving a response, the King said, "Don’t you know, sir, that every moment you spend here puts your life at risk?" "I’m not taking any more risks than you are, your Majesty," replied the gentleman. "Yes," said the King, "but my duty brings me here, while yours does not." Just a few minutes later, a cannonball hit the spot, and the gentleman was killed.

Thus can the faithful student reverse all the warnings of his early instinct, under the guidance of a deeper instinct. He learns to welcome misfortune, learns that adversity is the prosperity of the great. He learns the greatness of humility. He shall work in the dark, work against failure, pain, and ill-will. If he is insulted, he can be insulted; all his affair is not to insult. Hafiz writes,

Thus, a dedicated student can turn around all the warnings of their initial instincts, guided by a deeper intuition. They come to embrace misfortune, recognizing that adversity is the true wealth of the great. They understand the value of humility. They will work in the shadows, facing failure, pain, and hostility. If they face insults, they can endure them; their focus is not on insulting others. Hafiz writes,

At the last day, men shall wear
On their heads the dust,
As ensign and as ornament
Of their lowly trust.
 
On the final day, people will wear
Dust on their heads,
As a sign and as decoration
Of their humble faith.

The moral equalizes all; enriches, empowers all. It is the coin which buys all, and which all find in their pocket. Under the whip of the driver, the slave shall feel his equality with saints and heroes. In the greatest destitution and calamity, it surprises man with a feeling of elasticity which makes nothing of loss.

The moral equalizes everyone; it enriches and empowers all. It’s the currency that everyone carries in their pocket. Under the whip of the driver, the slave will feel equal to saints and heroes. Even in the deepest poverty and disaster, it gives people a sense of resilience that makes them indifferent to loss.

I recall some traits of a remarkable person whose life and discourse betrayed many inspirations of this sentiment. Benedict was always great in the present time. He had hoarded nothing from the past, neither in his cabinets, neither in his memory. He had no designs on the future, neither for what he should do to men, nor for what men should do for him. He said, 'I am never beaten until I know that I am beaten. I meet powerful brutal people to whom I have no skill to reply. They think they have defeated me. It is so published in society, in the journals; I am defeated in this fashion, in all men's sight, perhaps on a dozen different lines. My ledger may show that I am in debt, cannot yet make my ends meet, and vanquish the enemy so. My race may not be prospering: we are sick, ugly, obscure, unpopular. My children may be worsted. I seem to fail in my friends and clients, too. That is to say, in all the encounters that have yet chanced, I have not been weaponed for that particular occasion, and have been historically beaten; and yet, I know, all the time, that I have never been beaten; have never yet fought, shall certainly fight, when my hour comes, and shall beat.' "A man," says the Vishnu Sarma, "who having well compared his own strength or weakness with that of others, after all doth not know the difference, is easily overcome by his enemies."

I remember some qualities of an exceptional person whose life and words reflected many inspirations of this feeling. Benedict was always impressive in the moment. He held onto nothing from the past, neither in his belongings nor in his mind. He had no plans for the future, neither for what he should do for others nor for what others should do for him. He said, "I’m never truly defeated until I realize that I am. I face powerful, ruthless people whom I can't fight back against. They believe they’ve beaten me. It’s widely known, published in society and the news; I’m seen as defeated in this way, across many fronts. My ledger may show that I’m in debt, that I’m struggling to make ends meet, and that my enemy is getting the best of me. My community may not be thriving: we are unwell, unattractive, unknown, and unpopular. My children may be struggling too. I seem to fail with my friends and clients as well. In all the encounters I’ve faced so far, I wasn’t prepared for that specific moment and got historically beaten; yet, I know all the while that I have never truly been defeated; I have not fought yet, but I will definitely fight when the time comes, and I will win." "A man," says the Vishnu Sarma, "who has carefully measured his own strength or weakness against that of others, and still doesn't see the difference, will easily be overcome by his enemies."

'I spent,' he said, 'ten months in the country. Thick-starred Orion was my only companion. Wherever a squirrel or a bee can go with security, I can go. I ate whatever was set before me; I touched ivy and dogwood. When I went abroad, I kept company with every man on the road, for I knew that my evil and my good did not come from these, but from the Spirit, whose servant I was. For I could not stoop to be a circumstance, as they did, who put their life into their fortune and their company. I would not degrade myself by casting about in my memory for a thought, nor by waiting for one. If the thought come, I would give it entertainment. It should, as it ought, go into my hands and feet; but if it come not spontaneously, it comes not rightly at all. If it can spare me, I am sure I can spare it. It shall be the same with my friends. I will never woo the loveliest. I will not ask any friendship or favor. When I come to my own, we shall both know it. Nothing will be to be asked or to be granted.' Benedict went out to seek his friend, and met him on the way; but he expressed no surprise at any coincidences. On the other hand, if he called at the door of his friend, and he was not at home, he did not go again; concluding that he had misinterpreted the intimations.

"I spent," he said, "ten months in the countryside. The starry Orion was my only companion. Wherever a squirrel or a bee can go safely, I can go. I ate whatever was served to me; I touched ivy and dogwood. When I ventured out, I chatted with every person on the road because I knew that my good and bad feelings didn’t come from them, but from the Spirit, whose servant I was. I wouldn’t lower myself to be a circumstance, like they did, who tied their lives to their fortune and their company. I wouldn’t degrade myself by rummaging through my memory for a thought, nor by waiting for one. If a thought came, I’d be ready for it. It should, as it should, move into my hands and feet; but if it doesn’t come naturally, it doesn’t come rightly at all. If it can do without me, I know I can do without it. The same goes for my friends. I will never chase after the most beautiful. I won’t ask for any friendship or favor. When I meet the right people, we’ll both know it. There won’t be anything to ask for or to give." Benedict went out to find his friend and met him along the way; however, he showed no surprise at any coincidences. On the other hand, if he knocked on his friend's door and he wasn’t home, he didn’t try again; concluding he had misunderstood the signs.

He had the whim not to make an apology to the same individual whom he had wronged. For this, he said, was a piece of personal vanity; but he would correct his conduct in that respect in which he had faulted, to the next person he should meet. Thus, he said, universal justice was satisfied.

He decided not to apologize to the person he had wronged. He believed that doing so would be a matter of personal pride; instead, he would make it right with the next person he encountered. That way, he felt, universal justice would be served.

Mira came to ask what she should do with the poor Genesee woman who had hired herself to work for her, at a shilling a day, and, now sickening, was like to be bedridden on her hands. Should she keep her, or should she dismiss her? But Benedict said, 'Why ask? One thing will clear itself as the thing to be done, and not another, when the hour comes. Is it a question, whether to put her into the street? Just as much whether to thrust the little Jenny on your arm into the street. The milk and meal you give the beggar, will fatten Jenny. Thrust the woman out, and you thrust your babe out of doors, whether it so seem to you or not.'

Mira came to ask what she should do about the sick Genesee woman who had hired herself to work for her at a shilling a day and was now getting worse, likely to be bedridden soon. Should she keep her or let her go? But Benedict said, "Why ask? One thing will sort itself out as the right choice when the time comes. Is it even a question whether to throw her out on the street? It’s just as much a question as whether to throw little Jenny, who’s in your arms, out on the street. The milk and food you give to the beggar will help Jenny grow. If you throw the woman out, you’re throwing your baby out too, whether you realize it or not."

In the Shakers, so called, I find one piece of belief, in the doctrine which they faithfully hold, that encourages them to open their doors to every wayfaring man who proposes to come among them; for, they say, the Spirit will presently manifest to the man himself, and to the society, what manner of person he is, and whether he belongs among them. They do not receive him, they do not reject him. And not in vain have they worn their clay coat, and drudged in their fields, and shuffled in their Bruin dance, from year to year, if they have truly learned thus much wisdom.

In the Shakers, as they are called, I see one core belief in the doctrine they hold dear that encourages them to welcome any traveler who wants to join them. They believe that the Spirit will soon reveal to both the individual and the community what kind of person he is and whether he fits in. They neither accept him nor turn him away. Their years spent in humble work, farming, and dancing in their Bruin dance will not have been in vain if they have truly gained this insight.

Honor him whose life is perpetual victory; him, who, by sympathy with the invisible and real, finds support in labor, instead of praise; who does not shine, and would rather not. With eyes open, he makes the choice of virtue, which outrages the virtuous; of religion, which churches stop their discords to burn and exterminate; for the highest virtue is always against the law.

Honor him whose life is a constant win; him, who, by connecting with the unseen and genuine, finds strength in work, not in recognition; who doesn't stand out and prefers it that way. With his eyes wide open, he chooses virtue, which angers the righteous; religion, which churches quiet their arguments to destroy and eliminate; because true virtue is always at odds with the law.

Miracle comes to the miraculous, not to the arithmetician. Talent and success interest me but moderately. The great class, they who affect our imagination, the men who could not make their hands meet around their objects, the rapt, the lost, the fools of ideas,—they suggest what they cannot execute. They speak to the ages, and are heard from afar. The Spirit does not love cripples and malformations. If there ever was a good man, be certain, there was another, and will be more.

Miracles happen to those who believe in them, not to those who rely on calculations. I'm somewhat interested in talent and success, but not too deeply. The real heroes are those who capture our imagination, the people who struggle to connect with their goals, the passionate, the dreamers, the visionaries—they hint at things they can't quite achieve. They resonate through time and are recognized from a distance. The Spirit doesn’t favor the limited or imperfect. If there has ever been a genuinely good person, you can be sure there have been others, and there will be more to come.

And so in relation to that future hour, that spectre clothed with beauty at our curtain by night, at our table by day,—the apprehension, the assurance of a coming change. The race of mankind have always offered at least this implied thanks for the gift of existence,—namely, the terror of its being taken away; the insatiable curiosity and appetite for its continuation. The whole revelation that is vouchsafed us, is, the gentle trust, which, in our experience we find, will cover also with flowers the slopes of this chasm.

And so, regarding that future moment, that beautiful specter at our curtain by night and at our table by day—there's both the fear and the certainty of a change coming. Humanity has always expressed at least this unspoken gratitude for the gift of life—specifically, the fear of losing it; the endless curiosity and desire for it to go on. The entire insight we receive is this gentle trust, which, in our experience, we find can also cover the edges of this chasm with flowers.

Of immortality, the soul, when well employed, is incurious. It is so well, that it is sure it will be well. It asks no questions of the Supreme Power. The son of Antiochus asked his father, when he would join battle? "Dost thou fear," replied the King, "that thou only in all the army wilt not hear the trumpet?" 'Tis a higher thing to confide, that, if it is best we should live, we shall live,—'tis higher to have this conviction, than to have the lease of indefinite centuries and millenniums and æons. Higher than the question of our duration is the question of our deserving. Immortality will come to such as are fit for it, and he who would be a great soul in future, must be a great soul now. It is a doctrine too great to rest on any legend, that is, on any man's experience but our own. It must be proved, if at all, from our own activity and designs, which imply an interminable future for their play.

When it comes to immortality, a soul that's focused isn't worried. It knows it's doing well and has faith everything will be okay. It doesn't question the Supreme Power. The son of Antiochus asked his father when he would go into battle. The King replied, "Are you worried that you alone in the entire army won't hear the trumpet?" It's more noble to trust that if it's best for us to live, we will live—it's more valuable to believe this than to just have the promise of endless centuries and eons. The question of our worthiness is more important than the question of how long we will last. Immortality is only for those who are deserving, and anyone who wants to be a great soul in the future must be a great soul now. This is a truth too significant to rely on anyone else's story; it has to be proven through our own actions and intentions, which suggest a never-ending future for what we aim to achieve.

What is called religion effeminates and demoralizes. Such as you are, the gods themselves could not help you. Men are too often unfit to live, from their obvious inequality to their own necessities, or, they suffer from politics, or bad neighbors, or from sickness, and they would gladly know that they were to be dismissed from the duties of life. But the wise instinct asks, 'How will death help them?' These are not dismissed when they die. You shall not wish for death out of pusillanimity. The weight of the Universe is pressed down on the shoulders of each moral agent to hold him to his task. The only path of escape known in all the worlds of God is performance. You must do your work, before you shall be released. And as far as it is a question of fact respecting the government of the Universe, Marcus Antoninus summed the whole in a word, "It is pleasant to die, if there be gods; and sad to live, if there be none."

What we call religion weakens and demoralizes people. As you are, even the gods couldn't help you. People are often unfit to live because they don't meet their own needs, or they struggle with politics, bad neighbors, or illness, and they would gladly escape the responsibilities of life. But the wise instinct asks, 'How will death help them?' They aren't freed from those responsibilities when they die. You shouldn't wish for death out of fear. The weight of the Universe is on each moral agent's shoulders to keep them focused on their tasks. The only way out known in all of God's worlds is through action. You must complete your work before you can be free. And when it comes to understanding the government of the Universe, Marcus Antoninus summed it up perfectly: "It's pleasant to die if there are gods, and sad to live if there aren't."

And so I think that the last lesson of life, the choral song which rises from all elements and all angels, is, a voluntary obedience, a necessitated freedom. Man is made of the same atoms as the world is, he shares the same impressions, predispositions, and destiny. When his mind is illuminated, when his heart is kind, he throws himself joyfully into the sublime order, and does, with knowledge, what the stones do by structure.

And so I believe the final lesson in life, the universal song that comes from everything and everyone, is about willing obedience and the freedom we all need. Humans are made of the same particles as the universe; we experience the same feelings, tendencies, and fate. When a person gains insight and has a compassionate heart, they willingly embrace the beautiful order of things and do, through understanding, what stones do naturally by their design.

The religion which is to guide and fulfil the present and coming ages, whatever else it be, must be intellectual. The scientific mind must have a faith which is science. "There are two things," said Mahomet, "which I abhor, the learned in his infidelities, and the fool in his devotions." Our times are impatient of both, and specially of the last. Let us have nothing now which is not its own evidence. There is surely enough for the heart and imagination in the religion itself. Let us not be pestered with assertions and half-truths, with emotions and snuffle.

The religion that is meant to guide and fulfill the present and future, whatever else it may be, has to be intellectual. The scientific mind needs a faith that aligns with science. "There are two things," said Muhammad, "that I despise: the learned person in their disbelief, and the fool in their devotion." Our society is fed up with both, especially the latter. We should only accept what stands on its own evidence. There's definitely enough for the heart and imagination in the religion itself. Let’s not be burdened with claims and half-truths, or with emotions and sob stories.

There will be a new church founded on moral science, at first cold and naked, a babe in a manger again, the algebra and mathematics of ethical law, the church of men to come, without shawms, or psaltery, or sackbut; but it will have heaven and earth for its beams and rafters; science for symbol and illustration; it will fast enough gather beauty, music, picture, poetry. Was never stoicism so stern and exigent as this shall be. It shall send man home to his central solitude, shame these social, supplicating manners, and make him know that much of the time he must have himself to his friend. He shall expect no coöperation, he shall walk with no companion. The nameless Thought, the nameless Power, the superpersonal Heart,—he shall repose alone on that. He needs only his own verdict. No good fame can help, no bad fame can hurt him. The Laws are his consolers, the good Laws themselves are alive, they know if he have kept them, they animate him with the leading of great duty, and an endless horizon. Honor and fortune exist to him who always recognizes the neighborhood of the great, always feels himself in the presence of high causes.

There will be a new church based on moral science, initially cold and bare, like a baby in a manger again, representing the principles and mathematics of ethical law. It will be the church of future generations, without musical instruments like shawms, psalteries, or sackbuts; yet it will have heaven and earth as its beams and rafters, with science as its symbols and illustrations. It will quickly gather beauty, music, art, and poetry. Never has stoicism been as strict and demanding as this will be. It will send individuals back to their core solitude, put to shame these social, pleading behaviors, and help them realize that often, they must be their own best friend. They should not expect cooperation, nor will they walk with anyone else. The nameless Thought, the nameless Power, the superpersonal Heart—they will find peace in that alone. They only need their own judgment. No good reputation can help them, no bad reputation can harm them. The Laws are their comforters; the good Laws themselves are alive, aware if they have followed them, and they inspire them with a sense of great responsibility and an endless horizon. Honor and fortune belong to those who always acknowledge the greatness around them, who always feel themselves in the presence of noble causes.

VII.

VII.

CONSIDERATIONS BY THE WAY.

Just a thought.

Hear what British Merlin sung,
Of keenest eye and truest tongue.
Say not, the chiefs who first arrive
Usurp the seats for which all strive;
The forefathers this land who found
Failed to plant the vantage-ground;
Ever from one who comes to-morrow
Men wait their good and truth to borrow.
But wilt thou measure all thy road,
See thou lift the lightest load.
Who has little, to him who has less, can spare,
And thou, Cyndyllan's son! beware
Ponderous gold and stuffs to bear,
To falter ere thou thy task fulfil,—
Only the light-armed climb the hill.
The richest of all lords is Use,
And ruddy Health the loftiest Muse.
Live in the sunshine, swim the sea,
Drink the wild air's salubrity:
Where the star Canope shines in May,
Shepherds are thankful, and nations gay.
The music that can deepest reach,
And cure all ill, is cordial speech:
Mask thy wisdom with delight,
Toy with the bow, yet hit the white.
Of all wit's uses, the main one
Is to live well with who has none.
Cleave to thine acre; the round year
Will fetch all fruits and virtues here:
Fool and foe may harmless roam,
Loved and lovers bide at home,
A day for toil, an hour for sport,
But for a friend is life too short.
Listen to what British Merlin sang,
Of the keenest eyes and the truest words.
Don’t say that the leaders who arrive first
Take the seats for which everyone strives;
The ancestors who discovered this land
Failed to secure a vantage point;
Always, those who come tomorrow
Look to borrow good and truth from others.
But if you measure all your journey,
Make sure to carry the lightest load.
Whoever has little can share with those who have less,
And you, Cyndyllan's son! be cautious
Of heavy gold and burdens to carry,
To hesitate before your task is complete—
Only the light-armed can climb the hill.
The richest of all lords is Use,
And vibrant Health is the highest Muse.
Live in the sunshine, swim in the sea,
Breathe the fresh, invigorating air:
Where the star Canope shines in May,
Shepherds are grateful, and nations are cheerful.
The music that can reach the deepest parts,
And heal all ills, is heartfelt speech:
Disguise your wisdom with delight,
Play with the bow, yet still hit the mark.
Of all the uses of wit, the main one
Is to live well with those who have none.
Stick to your land; throughout the year
All fruits and virtues will come here:
Fools and foes may roam freely,
Loved ones and lovers stay at home,
A day for work, an hour for play,
But life is too short for a friend.

CONSIDERATIONS BY THE WAY.

By the way, considerations.

Although this garrulity of advising is born with us, I confess that life is rather a subject of wonder, than of didactics. So much fate, so much irresistible dictation from temperament and unknown inspiration enters into it, that we doubt we can say anything out of our own experience whereby to help each other. All the professions are timid and expectant agencies. The priest is glad if his prayers or his sermon meet the condition of any soul; if of two, if of ten, 'tis a signal success. But he walked to the church without any assurance that he knew the distemper, or could heal it. The physician prescribes hesitatingly out of his few resources, the same tonic or sedative to this new and peculiar constitution, which he has applied with various success to a hundred men before. If the patient mends, he is glad and surprised. The lawyer advises the client, and tells his story to the jury, and leaves it with them, and is as gay and as much relieved as the client, if it turns out that he has a verdict. The judge weighs the arguments, and puts a brave face on the matter, and, since there must be a decision, decides as he can, and hopes he has done justice, and given satisfaction to the community; but is only an advocate after all. And so is all life a timid and unskilful spectator. We do what we must, and call it by the best names. We like very well to be praised for our action, but our conscience says, "Not unto us." 'Tis little we can do for each other. We accompany the youth with sympathy, and manifold old sayings of the wise, to the gate of the arena, but 'tis certain that not by strength of ours, or of the old sayings, but only on strength of his own, unknown to us or to any, he must stand or fall. That by which a man conquers in any passage, is a profound secret to every other being in the world, and it is only as he turns his back on us and on all men, and draws on this most private wisdom, that any good can come to him. What we have, therefore, to say of life, is rather description, or, if you please, celebration, than available rules.

While our tendency to give advice is part of who we are, I admit that life is more about wonder than about teaching. So much fate, so much unavoidable influence from our personalities and unknown inspirations plays into it, that we doubt we can say anything from our own experiences that might really help each other. All professions are anxious and hopeful efforts. The priest is pleased if his prayers or sermons resonate with even one soul; if it reaches two or ten, it's a big win. But he walks into the church without any certainty that he understands the problem or can fix it. The doctor prescribes nervously from his limited options, using the same medication or treatment for this new and unique case that he has tried with varying success on a hundred others before. If the patient gets better, he feels happy and surprised. The lawyer gives advice to the client, tells the story to the jury, and leaves it with them, feeling just as relieved as the client if they receive a favorable verdict. The judge considers the arguments, acts confidently, and since a decision has to be made, he does the best he can, hoping to achieve justice and satisfy the community; but he is really just an advocate at the end of the day. And so, all of life is an anxious and clumsy observer. We do what we have to do and label it as best as we can. We enjoy being praised for our actions, but our conscience says, "Not for us." There’s little we can do for one another. We walk with the young, offering sympathy and the wise words of the past, to the entrance of the arena, but it's clear that it's not because of our strength or the old sayings, but solely based on his own, which is unknown to us or anyone else, that he will either succeed or fail. What allows a person to triumph in any situation is a deep secret to everyone else in the world, and only by turning away from us and everyone else to draw on this private knowledge can any real good come to him. Therefore, what we have to say about life is more about description, or if you prefer, celebration, rather than practical rules.

Yet vigor is contagious, and whatever makes us either think or feel strongly, adds to our power, and enlarges our field of action. We have a debt to every great heart, to every fine genius; to those who have put life and fortune on the cast of an act of justice; to those who have added new sciences; to those who have refined life by elegant pursuits. 'Tis the fine souls who serve us, and not what is called fine society. Fine society is only a self-protection against the vulgarities of the street and the tavern. Fine society, in the common acceptation, has neither ideas nor aims. It renders the service of a perfumery, or a laundry, not of a farm or factory. 'Tis an exclusion and a precinct. Sidney Smith said, "A few yards in London cement or dissolve friendship." It is an unprincipled decorum; an affair of clean linen and coaches, of gloves, cards, and elegance in trifles. There are other measures of self-respect for a man, than the number of clean shirts he puts on every day. Society wishes to be amused. I do not wish to be amused. I wish that life should not be cheap, but sacred. I wish the days to be as centuries, loaded, fragrant. Now we reckon them as bank-days, by some debt which is to be paid us, or which we are to pay, or some pleasure we are to taste. Is all we have to do to draw the breath in, and blow it out again? Porphyry's definition is better; "Life is that which holds matter together." The babe in arms is a channel through which the energies we call fate, love, and reason, visibly stream. See what a cometary train of auxiliaries man carries with him, of animals, plants, stones, gases, and imponderable elements. Let us infer his ends from this pomp of means. Mirabeau said, "Why should we feel ourselves to be men, unless it be to succeed in everything, everywhere. You must say of nothing, That is beneath me, nor feel that anything can be out of your power. Nothing is impossible to the man who can will. Is that necessary? That shall be:—this is the only law of success." Whoever said it, this is in the right key. But this is not the tone and genius of the men in the street. In the streets, we grow cynical. The men we meet are coarse and torpid. The finest wits have their sediment. What quantities of fribbles, paupers, invalids, epicures, antiquaries, politicians, thieves, and triflers of both sexes, might be advantageously spared! Mankind divides itself into two classes,—benefactors and malefactors. The second class is vast, the first a handful. A person seldom falls sick, but the bystanders are animated with a faint hope that he will die:—quantities of poor lives; of distressing invalids; of cases for a gun. Franklin said, "Mankind are very superficial and dastardly: they begin upon a thing, but, meeting with a difficulty, they fly from it discouraged: but they have capacities, if they would employ them." Shall we then judge a country by the majority, or by the minority? By the minority, surely. 'Tis pedantry to estimate nations by the census, or by square miles of land, or other than by their importance to the mind of the time.

Yet energy is contagious, and anything that makes us think or feel deeply increases our power and expands our range of action. We owe a debt to every great heart and every brilliant mind; to those who risked everything for justice; to those who have introduced new knowledge; to those who have enhanced life through sophisticated pursuits. It’s the noble souls who truly serve us, not what’s considered fine society. Fine society is merely a way to shield oneself from the crudeness of the streets and taverns. In the common sense of the term, fine society has neither ideas nor goals. It serves the purpose of a perfume shop or a laundromat, not that of a farm or a factory. It represents exclusion and boundaries. Sidney Smith said, “A few yards in London can either strengthen or dissolve friendship.” It embodies a shallow decorum; it’s about clean clothes and carriages, gloves, cards, and the elegance of trivial matters. A man has other measures of self-respect than the number of clean shirts he puts on daily. Society seeks entertainment. I do not want to be entertained. I want life to be valued as sacred, not cheap. I want days to feel as weighty as centuries, filled with meaning and rich experiences. Nowadays, we count them like bank days, measuring them by debts to be settled or pleasures to be enjoyed. Is all we have to do just inhale and exhale? Porphyry's definition is better: “Life is what holds matter together.” The baby in our arms is a channel through which the energies we call fate, love, and reason flow visibly. Look at the whole array of entities that accompany a person: animals, plants, rocks, gases, and unseen elements. Let’s draw conclusions about our purposes from this grand display of resources. Mirabeau said, “Why should we consider ourselves human, unless it’s to succeed in everything, everywhere? You must never say of anything, That is beneath me, nor feel that anything lies outside your reach. Nothing is impossible for someone who is determined. If it’s necessary, then it shall be:—this is the only rule of success.” Whoever said it, this sentiment is spot on. But this is not the mindset of the people in the streets. In the streets, we become cynical. The people we encounter are crude and sluggish. The sharpest minds have their flaws. How many nuisances, misfortunes, invalids, gluttons, historians, politicians, thieves, and triflers of both genders could be eliminated without loss? Mankind divides into two categories—benefactors and malefactors. The second group is large; the first is just a handful. Rarely does someone fall ill without bystanders feeling a faint hope that he will die—so many poor lives, troubled invalids, and targets for a bullet. Franklin said, “Mankind is very superficial and cowardly: they start on a task, but when encountering difficulty, they retreat in discouragement; yet they possess potential, if only they would use it.” Should we then judge a country by the majority or the minority? By the minority, certainly. It’s foolish to evaluate nations by their population, land area, or anything other than their significance to the contemporary mindset.

Leave this hypocritical prating about the masses. Masses are rude, lame, unmade, pernicious in their demands and influence, and need not to be flattered but to be schooled. I wish not to concede anything to them, but to tame, drill, divide, and break them up, and draw individuals out of them. The worst of charity is, that the lives you are asked to preserve are not worth preserving. Masses! the calamity is the masses. I do not wish any mass at all, but honest men only, lovely, sweet, accomplished women only, and no shovel-handed, narrow-brained, gin-drinking million stockingers or lazzaroni at all. If government knew how, I should like to see it check, not multiply the population. When it reaches its true law of action, every man that is born will be hailed as essential. Away with this hurrah of masses, and let us have the considerate vote of single men spoken on their honor and their conscience. In old Egypt, it was established law, that the vote of a prophet be reckoned equal to a hundred hands. I think it was much under-estimated. "Clay and clay differ in dignity," as we discover by our preferences every day. What a vicious practice is this of our politicians at Washington pairing off! as if one man who votes wrong, going away, could excuse you, who mean to vote right, for going away; or, as if your presence did not tell in more ways than in your vote. Suppose the three hundred heroes at Thermopylæ had paired off with three hundred Persians: would it have been all the same to Greece, and to history? Napoleon was called by his men Cent Mille. Add honesty to him, and they might have called him Hundred Million.

Leave this hypocritical talk about the masses behind. The masses are rude, unrefined, and harmful in their demands and influence; they shouldn't be flattered but guided. I don't want to give them anything; I want to tame, train, divide, and break them apart, and draw individuals out of them. The worst aspect of charity is that the lives we are asked to protect are not worth saving. Masses! The true disaster is the masses. I don't want any mass at all, just honest men, beautiful and capable women, and none of the rough, narrow-minded, drunken stock workers or beggars. If the government knew what to do, I would want to see it control, not increase, the population. When it finds its right course of action, every person born will be celebrated as essential. Enough with this cheer for the masses; let’s hear the thoughtful votes of individual men made with honor and conscience. In ancient Egypt, it was the established law that the vote of a prophet counted as much as a hundred ordinary votes. I think that was greatly underestimated. "Clay and clay differ in dignity," as we notice from our preferences every day. What a terrible practice it is for our politicians in Washington to pair off! as if one man who votes incorrectly leaving could excuse you, who intend to vote correctly, for not being there; or as if your presence didn't matter in ways beyond just casting a vote. Imagine if the three hundred heroes at Thermopylae had paired off with three hundred Persians: would it have made any difference to Greece or to history? Napoleon was called by his men Cent Mille. If he had honesty, they might have called him Hundred Million.

Nature makes fifty poor melons for one that is good, and shakes down a tree full of gnarled, wormy, unripe crabs, before you can find a dozen dessert apples; and she scatters nations of naked Indians, and nations of clothed Christians, with two or three good heads among them. Nature works very hard, and only hits the white once in a million throws. In mankind, she is contented if she yields one master in a century. The more difficulty there is in creating good men, the more they are used when they come. I once counted in a little neighborhood, and found that every able-bodied man had, say from twelve to fifteen persons dependent on him for material aid,—to whom he is to be for spoon and jug, for backer and sponsor, for nursery and hospital, and many functions beside: nor does it seem to make much difference whether he is bachelor or patriarch; if he do not violently decline the duties that fall to him, this amount of helpfulness will in one way or another be brought home to him. This is the tax which his abilities pay. The good men are employed for private centres of use, and for larger influence. All revelations, whether of mechanical or intellectual or moral science, are made not to communities, but to single persons. All the marked events of our day, all the cities, all the colonizations, may be traced back to their origin in a private brain. All the feats which make our civility were the thoughts of a few good heads.

Nature produces fifty bad melons for every good one, and drops a tree full of knobby, wormy, unripe crabs before you can find a dozen dessert apples; she scatters nations of naked Native Americans and nations of clothed Christians, with only a couple of smart individuals among them. Nature works really hard, and only hits the target once in a million tries. For humanity, she's satisfied if she produces one exceptional person in a century. The harder it is to create good people, the more they're valued when they finally appear. I once took a count in a small neighborhood and found that every able-bodied man supported about twelve to fifteen people who depended on him for financial support—people he has to provide for, back, sponsor, nurse, and more. It doesn't matter much whether he's single or a family leader; as long as he doesn’t outright reject his responsibilities, he's bound to provide some help in one way or another. This is the price his abilities pay. Good people are utilized for personal benefits and for broader impact. All discoveries, whether in technology, intellect, or moral understanding, come not to communities but to individual people. Every significant event of our time, every city, every colonization can be traced back to the mind of a single person. All the accomplishments that shape our civility originated from the thoughts of a few remarkable individuals.

Meantime, this spawning productivity is not noxious or needless. You would say, this rabble of nations might be spared. But no, they are all counted and depended on. Fate keeps everything alive so long as the smallest thread of public necessity holds it on to the tree. The coxcomb and bully and thief class are allowed as proletaries, every one of their vices being the excess or acridity of a virtue. The mass are animal, in pupilage, and near chimpanzee. But the units, whereof this mass is composed are neuters, every one of which may be grown to a queen-bee. The rule is, we are used as brute atoms, until we think: then, we use all the rest. Nature turns all malfaisance to good. Nature provided for real needs. No sane man at last distrusts himself. His existence is a perfect answer to all sentimental cavils. If he is, he is wanted, and has the precise properties that are required. That we are here, is proof we ought to be here. We have as good right, and the same sort of right to be here, as Cape Cod or Sandy Hook have to be there.

In the meantime, this ability to reproduce isn’t harmful or unnecessary. You might think that this chaos of nations could be avoided, but that’s not the case; they’re all counted and relied upon. Fate keeps everything alive as long as there’s even the tiniest thread of public necessity tying it to the tree. The show-offs, bullies, and thieves are seen as part of the working class, with each of their bad traits being an exaggerated version of a virtue. The masses are like animals, in a state of learning, and close to being like chimpanzees. But the individuals that make up this mass are neutral, each of whom has the potential to become a queen bee. The rule is that we’re treated like mere particles until we start thinking: then, we make use of everything else. Nature turns all wrongdoing into something good. Nature meets real needs. Eventually, no sane person doubts themselves. Their existence is a complete answer to any sentimental arguments. If they exist, they are needed and possess the exact qualities required. Our presence here proves that we should be here. We have just as much right, and the same kind of right to be here, as Cape Cod or Sandy Hook have to be where they are.

To say then, the majority are wicked, means no malice, no bad heart in the observer, but, simply, that the majority are unripe, and have not yet come to themselves, do not yet know their opinion. That, if they knew it, is an oracle for them and for all. But in the passing moment, the quadruped interest is very prone to prevail: and this beast-force, whilst it makes the discipline of the world, the school of heroes, the glory of martyrs, has provoked, in every age, the satire of wits, and the tears of good men. They find the journals, the clubs, the governments, the churches, to be in the interest, and the pay of the devil. And wise men have met this obstruction in their times, like Socrates, with his famous irony; like Bacon, with life-long dissimulation; like Erasmus, with his book "The Praise of Folly;" like Rabelais, with his satire rending the nations. "They were the fools who cried against me, you will say," wrote the Chevalier de Boufflers to Grimm; "aye, but the fools have the advantage of numbers, and 'tis that which decides. 'Tis of no use for us to make war with them; we shall not weaken them; they will always be the masters. There will not be a practice or an usage introduced, of which they are not the authors."

Saying that the majority are evil doesn’t come from a bad attitude or heart in the observer; it simply means that the majority are immature and haven’t figured themselves out yet, and don’t yet have their own opinions. If they did understand their opinions, it would be a revelation for them and everyone else. But in the moment, the brute force of basic instincts tends to dominate: and this raw power, while it forms the order of the world, the training ground for heroes, and the honor of martyrs, has drawn criticism from clever minds and sorrow from good people throughout the ages. They find the newspapers, the clubs, the governments, and the churches to be working for the devil. And wise individuals have faced this challenge in their times, like Socrates with his well-known irony; like Bacon with his lifelong pretense; like Erasmus with his book "The Praise of Folly"; like Rabelais with his satire that tore apart nations. “You’ll say, ‘They were the fools who criticized me,’” wrote Chevalier de Boufflers to Grimm; “but yes, the fools have the advantage of numbers, and that’s what counts. It’s pointless for us to fight against them; we won’t weaken them; they will always be in charge. There won’t be any practice or custom introduced that they’re not behind.”

In front of these sinister facts, the first lesson of history is the good of evil. Good is a good doctor, but Bad is sometimes a better. 'Tis the oppressions of William the Norman, savage forest-laws, and crushing despotism, that made possible the inspirations of Magna Charta under John. Edward I. wanted money, armies, castles, and as much as he could get. It was necessary to call the people together by shorter, swifter ways,—and the House of Commons arose. To obtain subsidies, he paid in privileges. In the twenty-fourth year of his reign, he decreed, "that no tax should be levied without consent of Lords and Commons;"—which is the basis of the English Constitution. Plutarch affirms that the cruel wars which followed the march of Alexander, introduced the civility, language, and arts of Greece into the savage East; introduced marriage; built seventy cities; and united hostile nations under one government. The barbarians who broke up the Roman empire did not arrive a day too soon. Schiller says, the Thirty Years' War made Germany a nation. Rough, selfish despots serve men immensely, as Henry VIII. in the contest with the Pope; as the infatuations no less than the wisdom of Cromwell; as the ferocity of the Russian czars; as the fanaticism of the French regicides of 1789. The frost which kills the harvest of a year, saves the harvests of a century, by destroying the weevil or the locust. Wars, fires, plagues, break up immovable routine, clear the ground of rotten races and dens of distemper, and open a fair field to new men. There is a tendency in things to right themselves, and the war or revolution or bankruptcy that shatters a rotten system, allows things to take a new and natural order. The sharpest evils are bent into that periodicity which makes the errors of planets, and the fevers and distempers of men, self-limiting. Nature is upheld by antagonism. Passions, resistance, danger, are educators. We acquire the strength we have overcome. Without war, no soldier; without enemies, no hero. The sun were insipid, if the universe were not opaque. And the glory of character is in affronting the horrors of depravity, to draw thence new nobilities of power: as Art lives and thrills in new use and combining of contrasts, and mining into the dark evermore for blacker pits of night. What would painter do, or what would poet or saint, but for crucifixions and hells? And evermore in the world is this marvellous balance of beauty and disgust, magnificence and rats. Not Antoninus, but a poor washer-woman said, "The more trouble, the more lion; that's my principle." I do not think very respectfully of the designs or the doings of the people who went to California, in 1849. It was a rush and a scramble of needy adventurers, and, in the western country, a general jail-delivery of all the rowdies of the rivers. Some of them went with honest purposes, some with very bad ones, and all of them with the very commonplace wish to find a short way to wealth. But Nature watches over all, and turns this malfaisance to good. California gets peopled and subdued,—civilized in this immoral way,—and, on this fiction, a real prosperity is rooted and grown. 'Tis a decoy-duck; 'tis tubs thrown to amuse the whale: but real ducks, and whales that yield oil, are caught. And, out of Sabine rapes, and out of robbers' forays, real Romes and their heroisms come in fulness of time.

In light of these dark realities, the first lesson of history is the benefit of evil. Good is a great healer, but bad can sometimes be better. It was the oppression under William the Norman, harsh forest laws, and oppressive rule that set the stage for the inspiration of Magna Charta during John’s reign. Edward I needed money, armies, castles, and as much as he could get. To gather the people quickly and efficiently, the House of Commons was created. To obtain funds, he offered privileges in return. In the twenty-fourth year of his reign, he declared, "no tax should be collected without the consent of the Lords and Commons;"—which is the foundation of the English Constitution. Plutarch states that the brutal wars that followed Alexander's campaign brought Greek culture, language, and arts to the savage East; introduced marriage; built seventy cities; and united warring nations under one governance. The barbarians who dismantled the Roman Empire arrived just in time. Schiller argues that the Thirty Years' War transformed Germany into a nation. Rough and selfish rulers can significantly benefit people, as seen with Henry VIII in his conflict with the Pope; the misguided as well as wise actions of Cromwell; the brutality of the Russian czars; and the fanaticism of the French revolutionaries of 1789. The frost that destroys a year's harvest ultimately saves the crops of a century by getting rid of pests like weevils or locusts. Wars, fires, and plagues disrupt stagnant routines, clear out decaying populations and unhealthy conditions, and create opportunities for new leaders. There is a tendency for things to eventually balance out, and the war, revolution, or bankruptcy that shatters a corrupt system allows for a fresh and natural order. The sharpest evils often fall into that cyclical pattern which causes the errors of planets, and the ailments of humanity, to be self-correcting. Nature thrives on conflict. Passions, resistance, and danger are valuable teachers. We gain strength through overcoming challenges. Without war, there would be no soldiers; without enemies, no heroes. The sun would be unexciting if the universe were completely transparent. The true essence of character lies in facing the horrors of depravity to extract new forms of power: like how art thrives on innovation and contrasts, continually delving into the darkness for deeper depths. What would painters, poets, or saints do without suffering and hell? There’s always this incredible balance in the world of beauty and horror, magnificence and decay. Not Antoninus, but a humble washerwoman said, "The more trouble, the more lion; that’s my principle." I don’t have a very high regard for the motives or actions of the people who rushed to California in 1849. It was a chaotic scramble of desperate adventurers and, in the West, a massive release of all the rowdies from the rivers. Some had honest intentions, some had very bad ones, and all shared the common desire to find a shortcut to wealth. But nature oversees everything and transforms this wrongdoing into something good. California becomes populated and tamed—civilized through these dubious means—and, on this foundation, genuine prosperity takes root and flourishes. It’s a decoy—like bait to entertain a whale: but true ducks, and whales that yield oil, are caught. And, out of the chaos of Sabine abductions and robberies, real Romes and their heroes emerge in due time.

In America, the geography is sublime, but the men are not: the inventions are excellent, but the inventors one is sometimes ashamed of. The agencies by which events so grand as the opening of California, of Texas, of Oregon, and the junction of the two oceans, are effected, are paltry,—coarse selfishness, fraud, and conspiracy: and most of the great results of history are brought about by discreditable means.

In America, the landscape is breathtaking, but the people often fall short: the inventions are impressive, yet some inventors leave much to be desired. The ways in which monumental events like the opening of California, Texas, Oregon, and the joining of the two oceans occur are trivial—marked by crass selfishness, deceit, and conspiracy. Most of the significant outcomes in history come about through questionable means.

The benefaction derived in Illinois, and the great West, from railroads is inestimable, and vastly exceeding any intentional philanthropy on record. What is the benefit done by a good King Alfred, or by a Howard, or Pestalozzi, or Elizabeth Fry, or Florence Nightingale, or any lover, less or larger, compared with the involuntary blessing wrought on nations by the selfish capitalists who built the Illinois, Michigan, and the network of the Mississippi valley roads, which have evoked not only all the wealth of the soil, but the energy of millions of men. 'Tis a sentence of ancient wisdom, "that God hangs the greatest weights on the smallest wires."

The benefits from railroads in Illinois and the Midwest are immeasurable and far surpass any intentional charity on record. What kind of good comes from a great King Alfred, or a Howard, or Pestalozzi, or Elizabeth Fry, or Florence Nightingale, or any altruistic person, compared to the unintentional blessings created for nations by the self-serving capitalists who built the Illinois, Michigan, and the network of roads in the Mississippi Valley? These roads have not only unlocked all the wealth of the land but also the potential of millions of people. There's an old saying, "God hangs the greatest weights on the smallest wires."

What happens thus to nations, befalls every day in private houses. When the friends of a gentleman brought to his notice the follies of his sons with many hints of their danger, he replied, that he knew so much mischief when he was a boy, and had turned out on the whole so successfully, that he was not alarmed by the dissipation of boys; 'twas dangerous water, but, he thought, they would soon touch bottom, and then swim to the top. This is bold practice, and there are many failures to a good escape. Yet one would say, that a good understanding would suffice as well as moral sensibility to keep one erect; the gratifications of the passions are so quickly seen to be damaging, and,—what men like least,—seriously lowering them in social rank. Then all talent sinks with character.

What happens to nations happens every day in private homes. When a gentleman's friends pointed out the mistakes of his sons, emphasizing the dangers involved, he responded that he had seen a lot of trouble when he was a boy and turned out alright overall. So, he wasn’t too worried about the reckless behavior of boys; it was risky, but he thought they would hit rock bottom soon enough and then rise again. This is a risky approach, and many can fail to escape it successfully. Still, one would think that a good understanding, along with moral awareness, could be enough to keep someone on their feet; the immediate pleasures of passions are quickly recognized as harmful, and what people dislike even more—seriously damaging their social standing. As a result, all talent diminishes along with character.

"Croyez moi, l'erreur aussi a son mérite," said Voltaire. We see those who surmount, by dint of some egotism or infatuation, obstacles from which the prudent recoil. The right partisan is a heady narrow man, who, because he does not see many things, sees some one thing with heat and exaggeration, and, if he falls among other narrow men, or on objects which have a brief importance, as some trade or politics of the hour, he prefers it to the universe, and seems inspired, and a godsend to those who wish to magnify the matter, and carry a point. Better, certainly, if we could secure the strength and fire which rude, passionate men bring into society, quite clear of their vices. But who dares draw out the linchpin from the wagon-wheel? 'Tis so manifest, that there is no moral deformity, but is a good passion out of place; that there is no man who is not indebted to his foibles; that, according to the old oracle, "the Furies are the bonds of men;" that the poisons are our principal medicines, which kill the disease, and save the life. In the high prophetic phrase, He causes the wrath of man to praise him, and twists and wrenches our evil to our good. Shakspeare wrote,—

"Believe me, even mistakes have their worth," said Voltaire. We see those who overcome obstacles through their ego or arrogance that the wise would avoid. The right supporter is a headstrong, narrow-minded person who, because he doesn't see much, focuses intensely on one thing, often overselling it. When he connects with others of the same mindset or engages with matters of fleeting importance, like a current trade or politics, he tends to elevate it above everything else, seeming like a visionary and a blessing to those who want to amplify the issue and make their point. It would be better if we could harness the strength and passion that blunt, emotional people bring to society, free from their flaws. But who would dare to remove the linchpin from the wagon wheel? It's clear that every moral shortcoming is just a misplaced good passion; everyone owes something to their imperfections; according to the ancient wisdom, "the Furies are the bonds of men;" that toxins are often our best medicine, curing the illness and preserving life. In the grand prophetic words, He causes the wrath of man to praise him, and transforms our wrongs into our benefits. Shakespeare wrote,—

"'Tis said, best men are moulded of their faults;"
"'It is said, the best people are shaped by their mistakes;'"

and great educators and lawgivers, and especially generals, and leaders of colonies, mainly rely on this stuff, and esteem men of irregular and passional force the best timber. A man of sense and energy, the late head of the Farm School in Boston harbor, said to me, "I want none of your good boys,—give me the bad ones." And this is the reason, I suppose, why, as soon as the children are good, the mothers are scared, and think they are going to die. Mirabeau said, "There are none but men of strong passions capable of going to greatness; none but such capable of meriting the public gratitude." Passion, though a bad regulator, is a powerful spring. Any absorbing passion has the effect to deliver from the little coils and cares of every day: 'tis the heat which sets our human atoms spinning, overcomes the friction of crossing thresholds, and first addresses in society, and gives us a good start and speed, easy to continue, when once it is begun. In short, there is no man who is not at some time indebted to his vices, as no plant that is not fed from manures. We only insist that the man meliorate, and that the plant grow upward, and convert the base into the better nature.

and great educators and lawmakers, and especially generals and leaders of colonies, mostly depend on this stuff, and consider men with irregular and passionate energy the best material. A sensible and energetic man, the former head of the Farm School in Boston harbor, once said to me, "I want none of your good boys—give me the bad ones." This is probably why, as soon as children behave well, their mothers get anxious and think something is wrong. Mirabeau said, "Only those with strong passions can achieve greatness; only such people can earn the public’s gratitude." Passion, while not the best guide, is a powerful force. Any intense passion can free us from the daily small worries and concerns: it’s the heat that gets our human particles moving, overcoming the friction of crossing thresholds, engaging with others in society, and giving us a strong start and momentum, which is easy to maintain once it begins. In short, no one is entirely without their vices at some point, just as no plant exists without being nourished by fertilizers. We simply emphasize that a person should improve, and that the plant should grow upward, transforming the basic into something better.

The wise workman will not regret the poverty or the solitude which brought out his working talents. The youth is charmed with the fine air and accomplishments of the children of fortune. But all great men come out of the middle classes. 'Tis better for the head; 'tis better for the heart. Marcus Antoninus says, that Fronto told him, "that the so-called high-born are for the most part heartless;" whilst nothing is so indicative of deepest culture as a tender consideration of the ignorant. Charles James Fox said of England, "The history of this country proves, that we are not to expect from men in affluent circumstances the vigilance, energy, and exertion without which the House of Commons would lose its greatest force and weight. Human nature is prone to indulgence, and the most meritorious public services have always been performed by persons in a condition of life removed from opulence." And yet what we ask daily, is to be conventional. Supply, most kind gods! this defect in my address, in my form, in my fortunes, which puts me a little out of the ring: supply it, and let me be like the rest whom I admire, and on good terms with them. But the wise gods say, No, we have better things for thee. By humiliations, by defeats, by loss of sympathy, by gulfs of disparity, learn a wider truth and humanity than that of a fine gentleman. A Fifth-Avenue landlord, a West-End householder, is not the highest style of man: and, though good hearts and sound minds are of no condition, yet he who is to be wise for many, must not be protected. He must know the huts where poor men lie, and the chores which poor men do. The first-class minds, Æsop, Socrates, Cervantes, Shakspeare, Franklin, had the poor man's feeling and mortification. A rich man was never insulted in his life: but this man must be stung. A rich man was never in danger from cold, or hunger, or war, or ruffians, and you can see he was not, from the moderation of his ideas. 'Tis a fatal disadvantage to be cockered, and to eat too much cake. What tests of manhood could he stand? Take him out of his protections. He is a good book-keeper; or he is a shrewd adviser in the insurance office: perhaps he could pass a college examination, and take his degrees: perhaps he can give wise counsel in a court of law. Now plant him down among farmers, firemen, Indians, and emigrants. Set a dog on him: set a highwayman on him: try him with a course of mobs: send him to Kansas, to Pike's Peak, to Oregon: and, if he have true faculty, this may be the element he wants, and he will come out of it with broader wisdom and manly power. Æsop, Saadi, Cervantes, Regnard, have been taken by corsairs, left for dead, sold for slaves, and know the realities of human life.

The wise worker won’t regret the poverty or loneliness that helped him discover his talents. Young people are drawn to the charm and skills of the privileged. But all great individuals come from the middle class. It's better for the mind; it’s better for the heart. Marcus Antoninus mentioned that Fronto told him, “Most high-born people are, for the most part, heartless,” while true deep culture is reflected in a gentle consideration for those who are less fortunate. Charles James Fox said about England, “The history of this country shows that we shouldn’t expect vigilance, energy, and effort from wealthy individuals, without which the House of Commons would lose its greatest strength and impact. Human nature tends toward indulgence, and the most commendable public service has always come from those in a situation far removed from wealth.” Yet, what we seek daily is to fit in. Please, kind gods! fix what I lack in my speech, my appearance, my circumstances that makes me feel out of place: provide it, and let me be like those I admire and get along with them. But the wise gods say, No, we have greater things in store for you. Through humiliations, setbacks, loss of connection, and gaps in social standing, learn a broader truth and humanity than that of a wealthy gentleman. A Fifth Avenue landlord or a West End homeowner is not the highest form of man: and while good hearts and sound minds aren’t dependent on status, anyone who aims to be wise for many cannot be sheltered. He must understand the places where the poor live and the tasks they undertake. The true great minds, like Aesop, Socrates, Cervantes, Shakespeare, and Franklin, experienced the feelings and struggles of the poor. A rich man has never faced insult in his life, but this man must feel the sting. A rich man has never been exposed to the perils of cold, hunger, war, or criminals, and you can tell by the moderation of his thoughts. It’s a serious disadvantage to be pampered and to have too much comfort. What tests of manhood could he endure? Remove him from his safety nets. He might be a good bookkeeper or a clever advisor in an insurance office: maybe he could pass a college exam and earn his degrees: perhaps he can give wise advice in a court of law. Now place him among farmers, firefighters, Native Americans, and immigrants. Send a dog after him: let a highwayman attack him: put him through chaotic situations: send him to Kansas, Pike's Peak, or Oregon: and, if he possesses true skill, this could be the environment he needs, and he will emerge from it with deeper wisdom and genuine strength. Aesop, Saadi, Cervantes, and Regnard have been captured by pirates, left for dead, sold into slavery, and have learned the harsh realities of human life.

Bad times have a scientific value. These are occasions a good learner would not miss. As we go gladly to Faneuil Hall, to be played upon by the stormy winds and strong fingers of enraged patriotism, so is a fanatical persecution, civil war, national bankruptcy, or revolution, more rich in the central tones than languid years of prosperity. What had been, ever since our memory, solid continent, yawns apart, and discloses its composition and genesis. We learn geology the morning after the earthquake, on ghastly diagrams of cloven mountains, upheaved plains, and the dry bed of the sea.

Tough times have real value. These are moments a great learner shouldn't ignore. Just like we eagerly head to Faneuil Hall to be caught up in the fierce winds and strong emotions of passionate patriotism, times of extreme persecution, civil war, national bankruptcy, or revolution reveal more essential truths than the dull years of peace. What has always seemed like a solid continent suddenly splits apart, showing us what it's made of and how it came to be. We learn about geology the day after an earthquake, through shocking diagrams of broken mountains, raised plains, and the dry ocean floor.

In our life and culture, everything is worked up, and comes in use,—passion, war, revolt, bankruptcy, and not less, folly and blunders, insult, ennui, and bad company. Nature is a rag-merchant, who works up every shred and ort and end into new creations; like a good chemist, whom I found, the other day, in his laboratory, converting his old shirts into pure white sugar. Life is a boundless privilege, and when you pay for your ticket, and get into the car, you have no guess what good company you shall find there. You buy much that is not rendered in the bill. Men achieve a certain greatness unawares, when working to another aim.

In our lives and culture, everything gets mixed up and put to use—passion, war, rebellion, failure, as well as foolishness and mistakes, insults, boredom, and bad company. Nature is like a thrift store, turning every scrap and leftover into something new; like a good chemist I met recently, who was in his lab turning old shirts into pure white sugar. Life is an endless opportunity, and when you pay for your ticket and board the train, you have no idea what great company you’ll find there. You get a lot that isn’t listed on the ticket. People achieve a certain greatness without even realizing it when they’re focused on other goals.

If now in this connection of discourse, we should venture on laying down the first obvious rules of life, I will not here repeat the first rule of economy, already propounded once and again, that every man shall maintain himself,—but I will say, get health. No labor, pains, temperance, poverty, nor exercise, that can gain it, must be grudged. For sickness is a cannibal which eats up all the life and youth it can lay hold of, and absorbs its own sons and daughters. I figure it as a pale, wailing, distracted phantom, absolutely selfish, heedless of what is good and great, attentive to its sensations, losing its soul, and afflicting other souls with meanness and mopings, and with ministration to its voracity of trifles. Dr. Johnson said severely, "Every man is a rascal as soon as he is sick." Drop the cant, and treat it sanely. In dealing with the drunken, we do not affect to be drunk. We must treat the sick with the same firmness, giving them, of course, every aid,—but withholding ourselves. I once asked a clergyman in a retired town, who were his companions? what men of ability he saw? he replied, that he spent his time with the sick and the dying. I said, he seemed to me to need quite other company, and all the more that he had this: for if people were sick and dying to any purpose, we would leave all and go to them, but, as far as I had observed, they were as frivolous as the rest, and sometimes much more frivolous. Let us engage our companions not to spare us. I knew a wise woman who said to her friends, "When I am old, rule me." And the best part of health is fine disposition. It is more essential than talent, even in the works of talent. Nothing will supply the want of sunshine to peaches, and, to make knowledge valuable, you must have the cheerfulness of wisdom. Whenever you are sincerely pleased, you are nourished. The joy of the spirit indicates its strength. All healthy things are sweet-tempered. Genius works in sport, and goodness smiles to the last; and, for the reason, that whoever sees the law which distributes things, does not despond, but is animated to great desires and endeavors. He who desponds betrays that he has not seen it.

If we’re going to talk about the basic rules of life, I won’t repeat the obvious first rule of self-sufficiency, which has been stated time and again: that everyone should take care of themselves—but I will say, prioritize your health. No amount of work, sacrifice, moderation, poverty, or exercise to achieve it should be resented. Because sickness is a beast that consumes all the life and youth it can grab, devouring its own. I imagine it as a pale, wailing, troubled ghost, completely selfish, indifferent to what is good and noble, only focused on its own feelings, losing its spirit, and bringing everyone down with its negativity and obsession with trivial things. Dr. Johnson harshly stated, “Every man is a rascal as soon as he is sick.” Let’s drop the nonsense and deal with it sensibly. When dealing with a drunk person, we don’t pretend to be drunk ourselves. We need to treat the sick with the same strength, of course providing all the support we can—but keeping our own selves intact. I once asked a clergyman in a quiet town who his companions were, what capable people he interacted with. He said he spent time with the sick and dying. I told him he really needed different company, especially since he had this kind of company: because if those people needed our attention so much, we’d drop everything to be with them. But from what I’ve seen, they were just as trivial as anyone else, sometimes even more so. Let’s encourage our friends to be honest with us. I knew a wise woman who told her friends, “When I’m old, take charge of me.” And the best part of health is having a good attitude. It’s even more important than talent, even in talented work. Nothing can replace the need for sunlight for peaches, and to make knowledge valuable, you need the brightness of wisdom. Whenever you truly feel joy, you are nourished. The joy of the spirit shows its strength. All healthy things have a great attitude. Genius plays while it works, and kindness lasts until the end; and for this reason, anyone who understands the natural order of things isn’t hopeless but is inspired to great aspirations and efforts. The person who is hopeless shows that they haven’t grasped it.

'Tis a Dutch proverb, that "paint costs nothing," such are its preserving qualities in damp climates. Well, sunshine costs less, yet is finer pigment. And so of cheerfulness, or a good temper, the more it is spent, the more of it remains. The latent heat of an ounce of wood or stone is inexhaustible. You may rub the same chip of pine to the point of kindling, a hundred times; and the power of happiness of any soul is not to be computed or drained. It is observed that a depression of spirits develops the germs of a plague in individuals and nations.

There’s a Dutch saying, “paint costs nothing,” because of its ability to preserve in damp climates. Well, sunshine costs less, yet is a better color. The same goes for cheerfulness or a good attitude; the more you share it, the more you have left. The hidden warmth in an ounce of wood or stone is endless. You can rub the same piece of pine to the point of igniting it a hundred times, and the happiness of any person can’t be measured or drained. It’s noted that feeling down can create the seeds of a plague in both individuals and nations.

It is an old commendation of right behavior, "Aliis lœtus, sapiens sibi," which our English proverb translates, "Be merry and wise." I know how easy it is to men of the world to look grave and sneer at your sanguine youth, and its glittering dreams. But I find the gayest castles in the air that were ever piled, far better for comfort and for use, than the dungeons in the air that are daily dug and caverned out by grumbling, discontented people. I know those miserable fellows, and I hate them, who see a black star always riding through the light and colored clouds in the sky overhead: waves of light pass over and hide it for a moment, but the black star keeps fast in the zenith. But power dwells with cheerfulness; hope puts us in a working mood, whilst despair is no muse, and untunes the active powers. A man should make life and Nature happier to us, or he had better never been born. When the political economist reckons up the unproductive classes, he should put at the head this class of pitiers of themselves, cravers of sympathy, bewailing imaginary disasters. An old French verse runs, in my translation:—

It’s an old saying about good behavior, "Aliis lœtus, sapiens sibi," which our English proverb translates to, "Be merry and wise." I know how easy it is for worldly people to look serious and scoff at your optimistic youth and its shining dreams. But I find that the brightest castles in the air ever built are much better for comfort and utility than the gloomy pits in the air that discontented people dig out every day. I know those miserable souls, and I can’t stand them, who always see a dark star hovering through the bright, colorful clouds above: waves of light might pass by and hide it for a moment, but the dark star remains fixed at the zenith. However, happiness brings power; hope gets us into a productive mindset, while despair does not inspire and disrupts our abilities. A person should make life and Nature better for us, or they would have been better off never being born. When a political economist tallies up the unproductive classes, they should put these self-pitying people—those seeking sympathy and lamenting imaginary catastrophes—at the top of the list. An old French verse runs, in my translation:—

Some of your griefs you have cured,
And the sharpest you still have survived;
But what torments of pain you endured
From evils that never arrived!
 
You've managed to heal some of your sorrows,
And you've survived the most intense ones;
But think of the torment you faced
From troubles that never came!

There are three wants which never can be satisfied: that of the rich, who wants something more; that of the sick, who wants something different; and that of the traveller, who says, 'Anywhere but here.' The Turkish cadi said to Layard, "After the fashion of thy people, thou hast wandered from one place to another, until thou art happy and content in none." My countrymen are not less infatuated with the rococo toy of Italy. All America seems on the point of embarking for Europe. But we shall not always traverse seas and lands with light purposes, and for pleasure, as we say. One day we shall cast out the passion for Europe, by the passion for America. Culture will give gravity and domestic rest to those who now travel only as not knowing how else to spend money. Already, who provoke pity like that excellent family party just arriving in their well-appointed carriage, as far from home and any honest end as ever? Each nation has asked successively, 'What are they here for?' until at last the party are shamefaced, and anticipate the question at the gates of each town.

There are three desires that can never be satisfied: that of the rich, who always wants something more; that of the sick, who wants something different; and that of the traveler, who says, 'Anywhere but here.' The Turkish cadi told Layard, "Like your people, you’ve wandered from one place to another, until you’re happy and content in none." My fellow countrymen are just as obsessed with the fancy trinkets of Italy. All of America seems ready to head to Europe. But we won’t always travel across seas and land just for fun, as we say. One day, we’ll cast aside our obsession with Europe for a passion for America. Culture will bring depth and a sense of belonging to those who currently travel only because they don’t know how else to spend their money. Already, who evokes more pity than that well-dressed family just arriving in their fancy carriage, as far from home and any meaningful purpose as ever? Each nation has asked, 'What are they here for?' until finally the family feels embarrassed and anticipates the question at the entrance of each town.

Genial manners are good, and power of accommodation to any circumstance, but the high prize of life, the crowning fortune of a man is to be born with a bias to some pursuit, which finds him in employment and happiness,—whether it be to make baskets, or broadswords, or canals, or statutes, or songs. I doubt not this was the meaning of Socrates, when he pronounced artists the only truly wise, as being actually, not apparently so.

Having a friendly demeanor is great, and being able to adapt to any situation is valuable, but the greatest achievement in life, the ultimate fortune for a person, is to be born with a passion for a particular pursuit that brings them both work and happiness—whether that’s making baskets, broadswords, canals, statutes, or songs. I believe this is what Socrates meant when he said that artists are the only ones who are truly wise, because they are genuinely so, not just appearing to be.

In childhood, we fancied ourselves walled in by the horizon, as by a glass bell, and doubted not, by distant travel, we should reach the baths of the descending sun and stars. On experiment, the horizon flies before us, and leaves us on an endless common, sheltered by no glass bell. Yet 'tis strange how tenaciously we cling to that bell-astronomy, of a protecting domestic horizon. I find the same illusion in the search after happiness, which I observe, every summer, recommenced in this neighborhood, soon after the pairing of the birds. The young people do not like the town, do not like the sea-shore, they will go inland; find a dear cottage deep in the mountains, secret as their hearts. They set forth on their travels in search of a home: they reach Berkshire; they reach Vermont; they look at the farms;—good farms, high mountain-sides: but where is the seclusion? The farm is near this; 'tis near that; they have got far from Boston, but 'tis near Albany, or near Burlington, or near Montreal. They explore a farm, but the house is small, old, thin; discontented people lived there, and are gone:—there's too much sky, too much out-doors; too public. The youth aches for solitude. When he comes to the house, he passes through the house. That does not make the deep recess he sought. 'Ah! now, I perceive,' he says, 'it must be deep with persons; friends only can give depth.' Yes, but there is a great dearth, this year, of friends; hard to find, and hard to have when found: they are just going away: they too are in the whirl of the flitting world, and have engagements and necessities. They are just starting for Wisconsin; have letters from Bremen:—see you again, soon. Slow, slow to learn the lesson, that there is but one depth, but one interior, and that is—his purpose. When joy or calamity or genius shall show him it, then woods, then farms, then city shopmen and cab-drivers, indifferently with prophet or friend, will mirror back to him its unfathomable heaven, its populous solitude.

In childhood, we imagined ourselves enclosed by the horizon, like under a glass dome, and we didn’t doubt that through travel we could reach the baths of the setting sun and stars. But in reality, the horizon constantly retreats, leaving us in an endless plain, with no glass dome to shelter us. Yet it's strange how tightly we hold onto that dome-like view of a protective, familiar horizon. I see this same illusion play out in the quest for happiness, which I notice every summer revisiting this area, shortly after the birds begin pairing up. The young people don’t like the town, don't enjoy the seaside; they want to go inland to find a charming cottage hidden in the mountains, as secret as their own hearts. They set out on their travels searching for a home: they reach Berkshire; they reach Vermont; they look at farms—nice farms, high on the mountains: but where’s the privacy? The farm is close to this; it’s close to that; they’ve moved far from Boston, but it’s near Albany, or Burlington, or Montreal. They check out a farm, but the house is small, old, and bare; unhappy people have lived there and left: there’s too much sky, too much outdoors; it’s too public. The young person longs for solitude. When he arrives at the house, he just passes through it. That doesn’t create the deep place he was looking for. “Ah! Now I see,” he says, “it must be filled with people; only friends can add that depth.” Yes, but this year there’s a real shortage of friends; they’re hard to find and even harder to keep. They are just leaving; they too are caught up in the rush of the world and have plans and obligations. They are just setting out for Wisconsin; they have letters from Bremen: “See you again soon.” It’s a slow lesson to learn that there’s only one depth, only one interior, and that is—his purpose. When joy, disaster, or genius reveals it to him, then woods, then farms, then city shopkeepers and cab-drivers, alongside both prophets and friends, will reflect back to him its unfathomable sky, its crowded solitude.

The uses of travel are occasional, and short; but the best fruit it finds, when it finds it, is conversation; and this is a main function of life. What a difference in the hospitality of minds! Inestimable is he to whom we can say what we cannot say to ourselves. Others are involuntarily hurtful to us, and bereave us of the power of thought, impound and imprison us. As, when there is sympathy, there needs but one wise man in a company, and all are wise,—so, a blockhead makes a blockhead of his companion. Wonderful power to benumb possesses this brother. When he comes into the office or public room, the society dissolves; one after another slips out, and the apartment is at his disposal. What is incurable but a frivolous habit?

The benefits of travel are infrequent and brief; but the greatest value it brings, when it does, is conversation, which is essential to life. What a difference in how we connect mentally! It’s invaluable to have someone to share thoughts with that we can’t express to ourselves. Some people unintentionally harm us, stifling our ability to think and trapping us. Just as a single wise person can elevate the understanding of everyone around them, a fool can drag down those with him. This type of person has a remarkable ability to dull the atmosphere. When he enters a room, the conversation fades; one by one, people leave, and the space becomes his. What can’t be fixed but a trivial habit?

A fly is as untamable as a hyena. Yet folly in the sense of fun, fooling, or dawdling can easily be borne; as Talleyrand said, "I find nonsense singularly refreshing;" but a virulent, aggressive fool taints the reason of a household. I have seen a whole family of quiet, sensible people unhinged and beside themselves, victims of such a rogue. For the steady wrongheadedness of one perverse person irritates the best: since we must withstand absurdity. But resistance only exasperates the acrid fool, who believes that Nature and gravitation are quite wrong, and he only is right. Hence all the dozen inmates are soon perverted, with whatever virtues and industries they have, into contradictors, accusers, explainers, and repairers of this one malefactor; like a boat about to be overset, or a carriage run away with,—not only the foolish pilot or driver, but everybody on board is forced to assume strange and ridiculous attitudes, to balance the vehicle and prevent the upsetting. For remedy, whilst the case is yet mild, I recommend phlegm and truth: let all the truth that is spoken or done be at the zero of indifferency, or truth itself will be folly. But, when the case is seated and malignant, the only safety is in amputation; as seamen say, you shall cut and run. How to live with unfit companions?—for, with such, life is for the most part spent: and experience teaches little better than our earliest instinct of self-defence, namely, not to engage, not to mix yourself in any manner with them; but let their madness spend itself unopposed;—you are you, and I am I.

A fly is as uncontrollable as a hyena. Yet, silliness in the form of fun, joking, or wasting time can be easily tolerated; as Talleyrand said, "I find nonsense refreshingly unique." However, a toxic, aggressive fool disrupts the harmony of a household. I've seen an entire family of calm, sensible people become unhinged and distressed, victims of such a miscreant. The constant stubbornness of one perverse individual irritates even the best of us, as we must endure absurdity. But resistance only fuels the bitter fool, who believes that nature and gravity are wrong, and that he alone is right. Soon, all the residents in the home are warped, to whatever extent they possess virtues and capabilities, into contradictors, accusers, explainers, and fixers of this one wrongdoer; like a boat about to capsize or a runaway carriage—it's not just the foolish pilot or driver, but everyone on board is forced to take on strange and ridiculous positions to stabilize the vehicle and prevent it from tipping over. For a solution, while the situation is still manageable, I suggest calmness and honesty: let all truth spoken or acted upon remain neutral, or truth itself will become foolishness. But when the situation has become serious and harmful, the only safety is in cutting ties; as sailors say, sometimes you just have to cut and run. How do you live with unsuitable companions?—because life is mostly spent with such people, and experience teaches little better than our initial instinct for self-defense: simply avoid engaging or mixing with them; let their madness run its course without challenge; you are you, and I am I.

Conversation is an art in which a man has all mankind for his competitors, for it is that which all are practising every day while they live. Our habit of thought,—take men as they rise,—is not satisfying; in the common experience, I fear, it is poor and squalid. The success which will content them, is, a bargain, a lucrative employment, an advantage gained over a competitor, a marriage, a patrimony, a legacy, and the like. With these objects, their conversation deals with surfaces: politics, trade, personal defects, exaggerated bad news, and the rain. This is forlorn, and they feel sore and sensitive. Now, if one comes who can illuminate this dark house with thoughts, show them their native riches, what gifts they have, how indispensable each is, what magical powers over nature and men; what access to poetry, religion, and the powers which constitute character; he wakes in them the feeling of worth, his suggestions require new ways of living, new books, new men, new arts and sciences,—then we come out of our egg-shell existence into the great dome, and see the zenith over and the nadir under us. Instead of the tanks and buckets of knowledge to which we are daily confined, we come down to the shore of the sea, and dip our hands in its miraculous waves. 'Tis wonderful the effect on the company. They are not the men they were. They have all been to California, and all have come back millionnaires. There is no book and no pleasure in life comparable to it. Ask what is best in our experience, and we shall say, a few pieces of plain-dealing with wise people. Our conversation once and again has apprised us that we belong to better circles than we have yet beheld; that a mental power invites us, whose generalizations are more worth for joy and for effect than anything that is now called philosophy or literature. In excited conversation, we have glimpses of the Universe, hints of power native to the soul, far-darting lights and shadows of an Andes landscape, such as we can hardly attain in lone meditation. Here are oracles sometimes profusely given, to which the memory goes back in barren hours.

Conversation is an art where everyone is competing, as it’s something we all practice daily throughout our lives. Our typical mindset—if we look at people as they grow—isn't fulfilling; in everyday life, it can be pretty bleak and disappointing. What usually satisfies people is a good deal, a profitable job, a competitive edge, marriage, inheritance, or a legacy. With these goals, their conversations skim the surface: politics, business, personal flaws, overblown bad news, and the weather. This is disheartening, and they feel hurt and sensitive. But when someone comes along who can brighten this gloomy space with ideas, revealing their true potential, their unique qualities, and their incredible abilities to influence nature and others; showing them access to poetry, spirituality, and the traits that shape character; it awakens their sense of value. His suggestions call for new ways of living, fresh literature, new relationships, new arts and sciences, and suddenly, we break free from our mundane existence and see the vastness above us and below us. Instead of remaining trapped in the limited knowledge we face daily, we find ourselves on the shore of a vast ocean, dipping our hands into its wondrous waves. The transformation in the group is striking. They’re not the same people anymore. They’ve all been to California and returned as millionaires. There’s no book or pleasure in life that compares to this. If asked what’s been the best part of our experience, we’d say, a few honest conversations with wise individuals. Time and again, our discussions remind us that we belong to higher circles than we’ve yet seen; that there’s a mental power drawing us, with insights that are far more valuable for joy and impact than anything currently labeled as philosophy or literature. In passionate conversations, we catch glimpses of the Universe, hints of innate power within the soul, fleeting lights and shadows reminiscent of an Andes landscape, experiences that are difficult to grasp in solitude. Here, we sometimes receive profound insights, which our memory cherishes during dull moments.

Add the consent of will and temperament, and there exists the covenant of friendship. Our chief want in life, is, somebody who shall make us do what we can. This is the service of a friend. With him we are easily great. There is a sublime attraction in him to whatever virtue is in us. How he flings wide the doors of existence! What questions we ask of him! what an understanding we have! how few words are needed! It is the only real society. An Eastern poet, Ali Ben Abu Taleb, writes with sad truth,—

Add the agreement of will and personality, and you have the bond of friendship. What we mainly want in life is someone who encourages us to reach our potential. That’s the role of a friend. With them, we easily become great. There’s something inspiring about them that draws out the best in us. They open up the doors to life! What questions we ponder with them! What a deep understanding we share! And how few words it takes! It’s the only genuine companionship. An Eastern poet, Ali Ben Abu Taleb, writes with poignant truth,—

"He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare,
And he who has one enemy shall meet him everywhere."
"Someone with a thousand friends has no friend to lose,
And someone with one enemy will find them everywhere."

But few writers have said anything better to this point than Hafiz, who indicates this relation as the test of mental health: "Thou learnest no secret until thou knowest friendship, since to the unsound no heavenly knowledge enters." Neither is life long enough for friendship. That is a serious and majestic affair, like a royal presence, or a religion, and not a postilion's dinner to be eaten on the run. There is a pudency about friendship, as about love, and though fine souls never lose sight of it, yet they do not name it. With the first class of men our friendship or good understanding goes quite behind all accidents of estrangement, of condition, of reputation. And yet we do not provide for the greatest good of life. We take care of our health; we lay up money; we make our roof tight, and our clothing sufficient; but who provides wisely that he shall not be wanting in the best property of all,—friends? We know that all our training is to fit us for this, and we do not take the step towards it. How long shall we sit and wait for these benefactors?

But few writers have expressed this idea better than Hafiz, who highlights this connection as a sign of mental well-being: "You learn no secret until you understand friendship, for no divine knowledge reaches the unwell." Life isn't long enough for friendship. It's a serious and grand thing, like a royal visit or a religion, not a quick meal on the go. There’s a modesty about friendship, much like love, and while noble souls never forget it, they often don’t name it. With the finest people, our friendships or good relations go beyond any disagreements, status, or reputation. Yet, we often neglect to secure life’s greatest blessing—friends. We prioritize our health; we save money; we ensure our homes are solid and our clothes are adequate. But who wisely plans so that they aren't lacking the most valuable asset of all—friends? We know that all our training prepares us for this, yet we hesitate to take action. How long will we wait for these benefactors?

It makes no difference, in looking back five years, how you have been dieted or dressed; whether you have been lodged on the first floor or the attic; whether you have had gardens and baths, good cattle and horses, have been carried in a neat equipage, or in a ridiculous truck: these things are forgotten so quickly, and leave no effect. But it counts much whether we have had good companions, in that time;—almost as much as what we have been doing. And see the overpowering importance of neighborhood in all association. As it is marriage, fit or unfit, that makes our home, so it is who lives near us of equal social degree,—a few people at convenient distance, no matter how bad company,—these, and these only, shall be your life's companions: and all those who are native, congenial, and by many an oath of the heart, sacramented to you, are gradually and totally lost. You cannot deal systematically with this fine element of society, and one may take a good deal of pains to bring people together, and to organize clubs and debating societies, and yet no result come of it. But it is certain that there is a great deal of good in us that does not know itself, and that a habit of union and competition brings people up and keeps them up to their highest point; that life would be twice or ten times life, if spent with wise and fruitful companions. The obvious inference is, a little useful deliberation and preconcert, when one goes to buy house and land.

It doesn’t matter, when you look back five years, how you’ve been dressed or what diet you followed; whether you lived on the first floor or in the attic; whether you had gardens and baths, good livestock and horses, or if you were carried in a fancy carriage or a clunky truck: these things are forgotten so quickly and leave no lasting impression. But it matters a lot whether we’ve had good company during that time—almost as much as what we’ve been doing. And consider the huge importance of neighbors in all our interactions. Just as marriage, whether suitable or not, shapes our home, those who live nearby and share our social standing—just a few people at a manageable distance, no matter how poor their company—these, and only these, will be your companions in life: while those who are true, kindred spirits, bonded to you by heartfelt promises, will gradually and completely fade away. You can’t approach this delicate part of society in a systematic way; you can put in a lot of effort to bring people together and to establish clubs and debating societies, yet you might not see any real outcome. However, it’s clear that there’s a lot of potential goodness in us that we’re not aware of, and that a habit of coming together and competing elevates people and keeps them reaching for their best; life would be twice or ten times richer if spent with wise and nurturing friends. The obvious takeaway is that a bit of thoughtful planning is helpful when it comes to buying a house and land.

But we live with people on other platforms; we live with dependents, not only with the young whom we are to teach all we know, and clothe with the advantages we have earned, but also with those who serve us directly, and for money. Yet the old rules hold good. Let not the tie be mercenary, though the service is measured by money. Make yourself necessary to somebody. Do not make life hard to any. This point is acquiring new importance in American social life. Our domestic service is usually a foolish fracas of unreasonable demand on one side, and shirking on the other. A man of wit was asked, in the train, what was his errand in the city? He replied, "I have been sent to procure an angel to do cooking." A lady complained to me, that, of her two maidens, one was absent-minded, and the other was absent-bodied. And the evil increases from the ignorance and hostility of every ship-load of the immigrant population swarming into houses and farms. Few people discern that it rests with the master or the mistress what service comes from the man or the maid; that this identical hussy was a tutelar spirit in one house, and a haridan in the other. All sensible people are selfish, and nature is tugging at every contract to make the terms of it fair. If you are proposing only your own, the other party must deal a little hardly by you. If you deal generously, the other, though selfish and unjust, will make an exception in your favor, and deal truly with you. When I asked an iron-master about the slag and cinder in railroad iron,—"O," he said, "there's always good iron to be had: if there's cinder in the iron, 'tis because there was cinder in the pay."

But we live with people on other platforms; we live with dependents, not just with the young whom we’re meant to teach everything we know and give the benefits we’ve earned, but also with those who serve us directly for money. Yet the old rules still apply. Don’t let your relationship be purely financial, even if the service is measured in dollars. Make yourself essential to someone. Don’t make life difficult for anyone. This point is becoming more important in American social life. Our domestic help often turns into a ridiculous mess of unreasonable demands on one side and avoidance on the other. A clever man was asked on a train why he was going to the city. He replied, "I’ve been sent to find an angel to cook." A woman told me that one of her two maids was forgetful, and the other was completely absent. And the problem grows from the ignorance and hostility of every new wave of immigrants flooding into homes and farms. Few people realize that it’s up to the master or mistress what kind of service they get from their worker; that the same person can be a guardian spirit in one house and a nightmare in another. All sensible people are a bit selfish, and nature works to make every agreement fair. If you’re only looking out for yourself, the other party will likely take advantage of you. If you’re generous, the other person, even if selfish and unfair, will make an exception for you and treat you well. When I asked a steelmaker about the slag and cinder in railroad iron, he said, “Oh, there's always good iron available: if there's cinder in the iron, it’s because there was cinder in the pay.”

But why multiply these topics, and their illustrations, which are endless? Life brings to each his task, and, whatever art you select, algebra, planting, architecture, poems, commerce, politics,—all are attainable, even to the miraculous triumphs, on the same terms, of selecting that for which you are apt;—begin at the beginning, proceed in order, step by step. 'Tis as easy to twist iron anchors, and braid cannons, as to braid straw, to boil granite as to boil water, if you take all the steps in order. Wherever there is failure, there is some giddiness, some superstition about luck, some step omitted, which Nature never pardons. The happy conditions of life may be had on the same terms. Their attraction for you is the pledge that they are within your reach. Our prayers are prophets. There must be fidelity, and there must be adherence. How respectable the life that clings to its objects! Youthful aspirations are fine things, your theories and plans of life are fair and commendable:—but will you stick? Not one, I fear, in that Common full of people, or, in a thousand, but one: and, when you tax them with treachery, and remind them of their high resolutions, they have forgotten that they made a vow. The individuals are fugitive, and in the act of becoming something else, and irresponsible. The race is great, the ideal fair, but the men whiffling and unsure. The hero is he who is immovably centred. The main difference between people seems to be, that one man can come under obligations on which you can rely,—is obligable; and another is not. As he has not a law within him, there's nothing to tie him to.

But why go on about these endless topics and examples? Life gives each person their own challenges, and no matter what skill you choose—be it algebra, gardening, architecture, poetry, business, or politics—they're all within reach, even the amazing successes, if you just pick what you're suited for; start from the beginning, follow a logical order, and take it step by step. It's just as easy to shape iron anchors and forge cannons as it is to weave straw or boil granite as it is to boil water, as long as you follow all the necessary steps. Where there's failure, there's likely some confusion, some mistaken belief in luck, or a missed step that Nature won’t overlook. The favorable aspects of life can be achieved under the same conditions. Their appeal to you shows they're attainable. Our hopes can be prophetic. There needs to be commitment and dedication. How admirable is a life that stays true to its goals! Young ambitions are wonderful, and your ideas and life plans are admirable: but will you stick with them? I fear that not even one in that crowd of people, or perhaps one in a thousand, will remain committed; and when you confront them about their betrayal and remind them of their lofty promises, they’ve forgotten they made a vow. People are fleeting, constantly transforming into something else, and unreliable. The goal is great, the ideal is admirable, but people are wavering and uncertain. The true hero is the one who is steadfastly grounded. The primary difference between people seems to be that some can be relied upon to keep their commitments—are trustworthy—while others cannot. Without an internal compass, there’s nothing to anchor them.

'Tis inevitable to name particulars of virtue, and of condition, and to exaggerate them. But all rests at last on that integrity which dwarfs talent, and can spare it. Sanity consists in not being subdued by your means. Fancy prices are paid for position, and for the culture of talent, but to the grand interests, superficial success is of no account. The man,—it is his attitude,—not feats, but forces,—not on set days and public occasions, but, at all hours, and in repose alike as in energy, still formidable, and not to be disposed of. The populace says, with Horne Tooke, "If you would be powerful, pretend to be powerful." I prefer to say, with the old prophet, "Seekest thou great things? seek them not:"—or, what was said of a Spanish prince, "The more you took from him, the greater he looked." Plus on lui ôte, plus il est grand.

It's unavoidable to specify details of virtue and status and to blow them out of proportion. But in the end, everything depends on the integrity that surpasses talent and can do without it. Sanity is about not being controlled by your means. High prices are paid for status and the cultivation of talent, but for the big picture, superficial success doesn’t matter. It’s the person—it’s his attitude—not just achievements but the underlying forces—not just on special occasions, but at all times, both in calm and in action, still powerful and not easy to dismiss. The common folk say, with Horne Tooke, "If you want to be powerful, pretend to be powerful." I’d rather say, with the old prophet, "Are you seeking great things? don’t seek them:"—or, as was said of a Spanish prince, "The more you take from him, the greater he appears." Plus on lui ôte, plus il est grand.

The secret of culture is to learn, that a few great points steadily reappear, alike in the poverty of the obscurest farm, and in the miscellany of metropolitan life, and that these few are alone to be regarded,—the escape from all false ties; courage to be what we are; and love of what is simple and beautiful; independence, and cheerful relation, these are the essentials,—these, and the wish to serve,—to add somewhat to the well-being of men.

The secret of culture is to understand that a few key ideas keep showing up, whether in the struggles of the most humble farm or in the chaos of city life. These ideas are what truly matter—freedom from all false connections; the courage to be ourselves; a love for what is simple and beautiful; independence; and a positive attitude in our relationships. These are the essentials—along with the desire to help and to contribute to the well-being of others.

VIII.

VIII.

BEAUTY.

Beauty.

Was never form and never face
So sweet to SEYD as only grace
Which did not slumber like a stone
But hovered gleaming and was gone.
Beauty chased he everywhere,
In flame, in storm, in clouds of air.
He smote the lake to feed his eye
With the beryl beam of the broken wave
He flung in pebbles well to hear
The moment's music which they gave.
Oft pealed for him a lofty tone
From nodding pole and belting zone.
He heard a voice none else could hear
From centred and from errant sphere.
The quaking earth did quake in rhyme,
Seas ebbed and flowed in epic chime.
In dens of passion, and pits of wo,
He saw strong Eros struggling through,
To sun the dark and solve the curse,
And beam to the bounds of the universe.
While thus to love he gave his days
In loyal worship, scorning praise,
How spread their lures for him, in vain,
Thieving Ambition and paltering Gain!
He thought it happier to be dead,
To die for Beauty, than live for bread.
Was never form and never face
So sweet to say as only grace
Which did not rest like a stone
But hovered bright and was gone.
He chased beauty everywhere,
In fire, in storms, in clouds of air.
He struck the lake to satisfy his eye
With the beryl shine of the broken wave
He threw in pebbles just to hear
The moment's music they created.
Often a lofty tone rang for him
From swaying pole and stretching zone.
He heard a voice that no one else could hear
From centered and from wandering sphere.
The shaking earth quaked in rhythm,
Seas ebbed and flowed in epic tune.
In depths of passion and pits of woe,
He saw strong Eros struggling through,
To bring light to the dark and break the curse,
And shine to the limits of the universe.
While giving his days to love
In faithful worship, ignoring praise,
How futile their temptations were for him,
Sneaky Ambition and deceptive Gain!
He thought it better to be dead,
To die for Beauty, than live for bread.

BEAUTY.

Beauty.

The spiral tendency of vegetation infects education also. Our books approach very slowly the things we most wish to know. What a parade we make of our science, and how far off, and at arm's length, it is from its objects! Our botany is all names, not powers: poets and romancers talk of herbs of grace and healing; but what does the botanist know of the virtues of his weeds? The geologist lays bare the strata, and can tell them all on his fingers: but does he know what effect passes into the man who builds his house in them? what effect on the race that inhabits a granite shelf? what on the inhabitants of marl and of alluvium?

The way plants grow in spirals also affects education. Our books take a long time to get to the information we really want to learn. We put on a show with our science, but it feels distant and detached from the real world! Our botany classes focus only on names, not on their actual benefits: poets and storytellers talk about healing herbs, but what does the botanist really know about the usefulness of his weeds? The geologist can show us the layers of the earth and can count them on his fingers: but does he understand how those layers affect the person who builds a house on them? What impact do they have on the people living in granite areas? What about those living on marl or alluvium?

We should go to the ornithologist with a new feeling, if he could teach us what the social birds say, when they sit in the autumn council, talking together in the trees. The want of sympathy makes his record a dull dictionary. His result is a dead bird. The bird is not in its ounces and inches, but in its relations to Nature; and the skin or skeleton you show me, is no more a heron, than a heap of ashes or a bottle of gases into which his body has been reduced, is Dante or Washington. The naturalist is led from the road by the whole distance of his fancied advance. The boy had juster views when he gazed at the shells on the beach, or the flowers in the meadow, unable to call them by their names, than the man in the pride of his nomenclature. Astrology interested us, for it tied man to the system. Instead of an isolated beggar, the farthest star felt him, and he felt the star. However rash and however falsified by pretenders and traders in it, the hint was true and divine, the soul's avowal of its large relations, and, that climate, century, remote natures, as well as near, are part of its biography. Chemistry takes to pieces, but it does not construct. Alchemy which sought to transmute one element into another, to prolong life, to arm with power,—that was in the right direction. All our science lacks a human side. The tenant is more than the house. Bugs and stamens and spores, on which we lavish so many years, are not finalities, and man, when his powers unfold in order, will take Nature along with him, and emit light into all her recesses. The human heart concerns us more than the poring into microscopes, and is larger than can be measured by the pompous figures of the astronomer.

We should approach the ornithologist with a fresh perspective, hoping he can teach us what social birds communicate when they gather in autumn, chatting in the trees. The lack of empathy turns his recordings into a dull dictionary. His findings result in a lifeless bird. The true essence of the bird isn’t in its weight and size, but in its relationships with Nature; and the skin or skeleton you show me is no more a heron than a pile of ashes or a jar of gases, reduced to that, is Dante or Washington. The naturalist is led away from the path by the gap of his imagined progress. The boy had clearer insights when he looked at the shells on the beach or the flowers in the meadow, unable to name them, compared to the man who takes pride in his labels. Astrology fascinated us because it connected humans to the cosmos. Instead of being a solitary beggar, the furthest star acknowledged him, and he felt the star in return. No matter how reckless or distorted by frauds and merchants, the idea was true and profound, revealing the soul's acknowledgment of its vast connections, showing that climate, era, distant entities, and those close by, are all part of its story. Chemistry breaks things down, but it doesn't build them up. Alchemy, which aimed to transform one element into another, to extend life, to empower—was headed in the right direction. All our science misses a human aspect. The occupant is more than the dwelling. The bugs, stamens, and spores we spend so long studying are not the endgame, and as human abilities unfold, we will take Nature with us and illuminate all her hidden corners. The human heart matters more to us than obsessively examining microscopes and is bigger than what can be quantified by the grand numbers of the astronomer.

We are just so frivolous and skeptical. Men hold themselves cheap and vile: and yet a man is a fagot of thunderbolts. All the elements pour through his system: he is the flood of the flood, and fire of the fire; he feels the antipodes and the pole, as drops of his blood: they are the extension of his personality. His duties are measured by that instrument he is; and a right and perfect man would be felt to the centre of the Copernican system. 'Tis curious that we only believe as deep as we live. We do not think heroes can exert any more awful power than that surface-play which amuses us. A deep man believes in miracles, waits for them, believes in magic, believes that the orator will decompose his adversary; believes that the evil eye can wither, that the heart's blessing can heal; that love can exalt talent; can overcome all odds. From a great heart secret magnetisms flow incessantly to draw great events. But we prize very humble utilities, a prudent husband, a good son, a voter, a citizen, and deprecate any romance of character; and perhaps reckon only his money value,—his intellect, his affection, as a sort of bill of exchange, easily convertible into fine chambers, pictures, music, and wine.

We are just so superficial and skeptical. Men see themselves as cheap and worthless; yet a man is a bundle of potential. All the elements flow through his being: he is the very essence of nature and fire; he feels the opposite ends of the earth and the poles as if they are part of his blood: they are extensions of who he is. His responsibilities are measured by the very person he is; a truly right and whole man would resonate throughout the entire universe. It's interesting that we only believe as deeply as we live. We think heroes can't wield any more power than the superficial amusement that entertains us. A profound person believes in miracles, awaits them, believes in magic, believes that a speaker can dismantle their opponent; believes that the evil eye can wither, that a heartfelt blessing can heal; that love can amplify talent and overcome all challenges. From a great heart, secret energies constantly flow to attract significant events. But we value very ordinary qualities, like a responsible husband, a good son, a voter, a citizen, and dismiss any romantic notions of character; and perhaps we only consider his financial worth—his intellect and affection—as a sort of currency, easily exchanged for nice homes, art, music, and wine.

The motive of science was the extension of man, on all sides, into Nature, till his hands should touch the stars, his eyes see through the earth, his ears understand the language of beast and bird, and the sense of the wind; and, through his sympathy, heaven and earth should talk with him. But that is not our science. These geologies, chemistries, astronomies, seem to make wise, but they leave us where they found us. The invention is of use to the inventor, of questionable help to any other. The formulas of science are like the papers in your pocket-book, of no value to any but the owner. Science in England, in America, is jealous of theory, hates the name of love and moral purpose. There's a revenge for this inhumanity. What manner of man does science make? The boy is not attracted. He says, I do not wish to be such a kind of man as my professor is. The collector has dried all the plants in his herbal, but he has lost weight and humor. He has got all snakes and lizards in his phials, but science has done for him also, and has put the man into a bottle. Our reliance on the physician is a kind of despair of ourselves. The clergy have bronchitis, which does not seem a certificate of spiritual health. Macready thought it came of the falsetto of their voicing. An Indian prince, Tisso, one day riding in the forest, saw a herd of elk sporting. "See how happy," he said, "these browsing elks are! Why should not priests, lodged and fed comfortably in the temples, also amuse themselves?" Returning home, he imparted this reflection to the king. The king, on the next day, conferred the sovereignty on him, saying, "Prince, administer this empire for seven days: at the termination of that period, I shall put thee to death." At the end of the seventh day, the king inquired, "From what cause hast thou become so emaciated?" He answered, "From the horror of death." The monarch rejoined: "Live, my child, and be wise. Thou hast ceased to take recreation, saying to thyself, in seven days I shall be put to death. These priests in the temple incessantly meditate on death; how can they enter into healthful diversions?" But the men of science or the doctors or the clergy are not victims of their pursuits, more than others. The miller, the lawyer, and the merchant, dedicate themselves to their own details, and do not come out men of more force. Have they divination, grand aims, hospitality of soul, and the equality to any event, which we demand in man, or only the reactions of the mill, of the wares, of the chicane?

The goal of science was to expand human influence in all directions into Nature, until we could reach the stars with our hands, see through the earth with our eyes, understand the sounds of animals and birds with our ears, and feel the essence of the wind; and through our empathy, heaven and earth would converse with us. But that’s not our science. These fields like geology, chemistry, and astronomy may seem knowledgeable, but they leave us exactly where they found us. The inventions benefit the inventor, but offer questionable assistance to anyone else. The formulas of science are like the receipts in your wallet, valuable only to the owner. Science in England and America is wary of theory, and shuns the concepts of love and moral purpose. There’s a payback for this lack of humanity. What kind of person does science create? Young people aren't drawn to it. They say, I don’t want to become like my professor. The collector may have preserved all the plants in his collection, but he’s lost his vitality and sense of humor. He’s filled his jars with snakes and lizards, but science has diminished him too, trapping the person in a bottle. Our dependence on doctors reflects a kind of despair about ourselves. The clergy suffer from bronchitis, which doesn’t seem like a sign of spiritual health. Macready believed it came from their strained voices. One day, an Indian prince, Tisso, while riding in the forest, saw a herd of elk playing. “Look how happy,” he said, “these grazing elks are! Why shouldn't priests, who are comfortably housed and fed in temples, also enjoy themselves?” When he returned home, he shared this thought with the king. The king then gave him the rule over the kingdom for seven days, stating, “Prince, manage this empire for a week: after that time, I will execute you.” At the end of the week, the king asked, “What made you so thin?” He replied, “The dread of death.” The king responded, “Live, my child, and gain wisdom. You stopped taking breaks, thinking, I will be dead in seven days. Those priests in the temple constantly ponder death; how can they engage in enjoyable activities?” But those in science, or doctors, or clergy are not more victims of their fields than anyone else. The miller, lawyer, and merchant dedicate themselves to their own tasks and don’t emerge as stronger individuals. Do they possess intuition, lofty ideals, kindness, and the resilience we expect in humanity, or only the results of the mill, the goods, and the tricks of their trade?

No object really interests us but man, and in man only his superiorities; and, though we are aware of a perfect law in Nature, it has fascination for us only through its relation to him, or, as it is rooted in the mind. At the birth of Winckelmann, more than a hundred years ago, side by side with this arid, departmental, post mortem science, rose an enthusiasm in the study of Beauty; and perhaps some sparks from it may yet light a conflagration in the other. Knowledge of men, knowledge of manners, the power of form, and our sensibility to personal influence, never go out of fashion. These are facts of a science which we study without book, whose teachers and subjects are always near us.

No object truly captures our interest except for humanity, and in humanity, only its strengths; and while we recognize a perfect law in Nature, it appeals to us only in relation to people or how it connects to our minds. With the birth of Winckelmann over a hundred years ago, alongside this dry, specialized, post mortem science, an enthusiasm for the study of Beauty emerged; and perhaps some sparks from that enthusiasm can still ignite a fire in the other. Understanding people, understanding behaviors, the art of form, and our sensitivity to personal influence never go out of style. These are truths of a science we learn informally, with teachers and subjects always around us.

So inveterate is our habit of criticism, that much of our knowledge in this direction belongs to the chapter of pathology. The crowd in the street oftener furnishes degradations than angels or redeemers: but they all prove the transparency. Every spirit makes its house; and we can give a shrewd guess from the house to the inhabitant. But not less does Nature furnish us with every sign of grace and goodness. The delicious faces of children, the beauty of school-girls, "the sweet seriousness of sixteen," the lofty air of well-born, well-bred boys, the passionate histories in the looks and manners of youth and early manhood, and the varied power in all that well-known company that escort us through life,—we know how these forms thrill, paralyze, provoke, inspire, and enlarge us.

Our tendency to criticize is so ingrained that a lot of what we know about it falls into the realm of pathology. The crowd in the street often shows us more flaws than heroes or saviors: yet they all reveal their true nature. Every person creates their own surroundings, and we can make a pretty good guess about a person based on their environment. But Nature also provides us with plenty of signs of grace and kindness. The joyful faces of children, the beauty of teenage girls, "the sweet seriousness of sixteen," the proud demeanor of well-raised young men, the intense stories written in the expressions and behaviors of youth and early adulthood, and the diverse energies in all those familiar figures that accompany us through life—we understand how these appearances can thrill, paralyze, provoke, inspire, and elevate us.

Beauty is the form under which the intellect prefers to study the world. All privilege is that of beauty; for there are many beauties; as, of general nature, of the human face and form, of manners, of brain, or method, moral beauty, or beauty of the soul.

Beauty is the way the intellect likes to explore the world. All privilege comes from beauty; because there are many kinds of beauty, like the beauty of nature, the human face and body, of behavior, of intellect or style, moral beauty, or the beauty of the soul.

The ancients believed that a genius or demon took possession at birth of each mortal, to guide him; that these genii were sometimes seen as a flame of fire partly immersed in the bodies which they governed;—on an evil man, resting on his head; in a good man, mixed with his substance. They thought the same genius, at the death of its ward, entered a new-born child, and they pretended to guess the pilot, by the sailing of the ship. We recognize obscurely the same fact, though we give it our own names. We say, that every man is entitled to be valued by his best moment. We measure our friends so. We know, they have intervals of folly, whereof we take no heed, but wait the reappearings of the genius, which are sure and beautiful. On the other side, everybody knows people who appear beridden, and who, with all degrees of ability, never impress us with the air of free agency. They know it too, and peep with their eyes to see if you detect their sad plight. We fancy, could we pronounce the solving word, and disenchant them, the cloud would roll up, the little rider would be discovered and unseated, and they would regain their freedom. The remedy seems never to be far off, since the first step into thought lifts this mountain of necessity. Thought is the pent air-ball which can rive the planet, and the beauty which certain objects have for him, is the friendly fire which expands the thought, and acquaints the prisoner that liberty and power await him.

The ancients believed that a spirit or demon possessed each person at birth to guide them; these spirits were sometimes seen as a flickering flame partly embedded in the bodies they influenced—resting on the head of a bad person, while blending with the essence of a good person. They thought that the same spirit, upon its charge's death, would enter a newborn child, and they claimed they could predict the spirit's character by how the person lived their life. We sense something similar today, although we use our own terms. We say that everyone deserves to be judged by their best moments. We measure our friends like this. We know they have moments of foolishness that we overlook, patiently waiting for the return of their brilliance, which is always certain and beautiful. On the flip side, we all know people who seem burdened and, despite any talents they might have, never give off the vibe of being truly free. They’re aware of their condition and glance at us to see if we notice their sadness. We might think that if we could just say the right words to free them, the clouds would part, the little rider would be revealed and unseated, and they would find their freedom again. The solution seems close since the first step into deeper thought can move mountains. Thought is the essential force that can change the world, and the beauty some things hold for a person is the encouraging spark that expands their mind and reminds them that freedom and strength are within reach.

The question of Beauty takes us out of surfaces, to thinking of the foundations of things. Goethe said, "The beautiful is a manifestation of secret laws of Nature, which, but for this appearance, had been forever concealed from us." And the working of this deep instinct makes all the excitement—much of it superficial and absurd enough—about works of art, which leads armies of vain travellers every year to Italy, Greece, and Egypt. Every man values every acquisition he makes in the science of beauty, above his possessions. The most useful man in the most useful world, so long as only commodity was served, would remain unsatisfied. But, as fast as he sees beauty, life acquires a very high value.

The question of beauty takes us beyond appearances and prompts us to think about the underlying principles of things. Goethe said, "Beauty is a manifestation of hidden laws of Nature, which, without this appearance, would have been forever concealed from us." This deep instinct drives much of the excitement—often superficial and quite absurd—surrounding works of art, which leads countless eager travelers to Italy, Greece, and Egypt every year. Each person values every insight he gains in the study of beauty more than his material possessions. The most useful person in the most practical world, as long as only usefulness is prioritized, would remain unfulfilled. However, as soon as he perceives beauty, life gains profound worth.

I am warned by the ill fate of many philosophers not to attempt a definition of Beauty. I will rather enumerate a few of its qualities. We ascribe beauty to that which is simple; which has no superfluous parts; which exactly answers its end; which stands related to all things; which is the mean of many extremes. It is the most enduring quality, and the most ascending quality. We say, love is blind, and the figure of Cupid is drawn with a bandage round his eyes. Blind:—yes, because he does not see what he does not like; but the sharpest-sighted hunter in the universe is Love, for finding what he seeks, and only that; and the mythologists tell us, that Vulcan was painted lame, and Cupid blind, to call attention to the fact, that one was all limbs, and the other, all eyes. In the true mythology, Love is an immortal child, and Beauty leads him as a guide: nor can we express a deeper sense than when we say, Beauty is the pilot of the young soul.

I'm cautioned by the unfortunate experiences of many philosophers not to try to define Beauty. Instead, I’ll list some of its qualities. We attribute beauty to things that are simple, that don’t have unnecessary parts, that perfectly fulfill their purpose, that relate to all things, and that balance various extremes. It is the most lasting quality and the most uplifting quality. We say that love is blind, and Cupid is often depicted with a bandage over his eyes. Blind—yes, because he ignores what he doesn't like; but the most perceptive seeker in the universe is Love, who finds only what he desires. The mythologists explain that Vulcan was portrayed as lame, and Cupid as blind, to highlight that one is all about physical ability and the other, all about vision. In true mythology, Love is an immortal child, and Beauty guides him; we cannot express a deeper idea than when we say Beauty is the pilot of the young soul.

Beyond their sensuous delight, the forms and colors of Nature have a new charm for us in our perception, that not one ornament was added for ornament, but is a sign of some better health, or more excellent action. Elegance of form in bird or beast, or in the human figure, marks some excellence of structure: or beauty is only an invitation from what belongs to us. 'Tis a law of botany, that in plants, the same virtues follow the same forms. It is a rule of largest application, true in a plant, true in a loaf of bread, that in the construction of any fabric or organism, any real increase of fitness to its end, is an increase of beauty.

Beyond their sensory pleasure, the shapes and colors of nature have a fresh appeal for us in our understanding, showing us that no detail was added just for looks, but represents better health or improved function. The elegance of form in birds, animals, or the human body signifies a level of structural excellence; beauty is just an invitation from what we are connected to. It's a botanical principle that in plants, the same qualities follow the same shapes. This is a broad rule, true for plants and true for a loaf of bread, that in the creation of any structure or organism, any genuine enhancement of its suitability for its purpose corresponds to an enhancement of beauty.

The lesson taught by the study of Greek and of Gothic art, of antique and of Pre-Raphaelite painting, was worth all the research,—namely, that all beauty must be organic; that outside embellishment is deformity. It is the soundness of the bones that ultimates itself in a peach-bloom complexion: health of constitution that makes the sparkle and the power of the eye. 'Tis the adjustment of the size and of the joining of the sockets of the skeleton, that gives grace of outline and the finer grace of movement. The cat and the deer cannot move or sit inelegantly. The dancing-master can never teach a badly built man to walk well. The tint of the flower proceeds from its root, and the lustres of the sea-shell begin with its existence. Hence our taste in building rejects paint, and all shifts, and shows the original grain of the wood: refuses pilasters and columns that support nothing, and allows the real supporters of the house honestly to show themselves. Every necessary or organic action pleases the beholder. A man leading a horse to water, a farmer sowing seed, the labors of haymakers in the field, the carpenter building a ship, the smith at his forge, or, whatever useful labor, is becoming to the wise eye. But if it is done to be seen, it is mean. How beautiful are ships on the sea! but ships in the theatre,—or ships kept for picturesque effect on Virginia Water, by George IV., and men hired to stand in fitting costumes at a penny an hour!—What a difference in effect between a battalion of troops marching to action, and one of our independent companies on a holiday! In the midst of a military show, and a festal procession gay with banners, I saw a boy seize an old tin pan that lay rusting under a wall, and poising it on the top of a stick, he set it turning, and made it describe the most elegant imaginable curves, and drew away attention from the decorated procession by this startling beauty.

The lesson learned from studying Greek and Gothic art, along with ancient and Pre-Raphaelite painting, was invaluable: all beauty has to be organic; any external decoration is a flaw. It’s the strength of the structure that results in a radiant complexion: it's the health of the body that gives sparkle and depth to the eyes. It’s the proper alignment and connection of the skull's sockets that creates graceful outlines and fluid movement. A cat and a deer can never move or sit awkwardly. A dance instructor can’t teach someone with a poor physique to walk elegantly. The color of a flower comes from its roots, and the luster of a seashell begins with its origins. Therefore, our taste in architecture rejects paint and all gimmicks, showcasing the natural grain of the wood; it turns down columns and pilasters that serve no purpose, allowing the actual supports of the building to be visible. Every necessary or organic action is pleasing to the observer. A person leading a horse to drink, a farmer planting seeds, the work of haymakers in the fields, a carpenter building a ship, a blacksmith at his forge, or any useful work appeals to the discerning eye. But if it’s done just for show, it comes off as cheap. How stunning ships look at sea! But ships in a theater—or ships staged for visual effect at Virginia Water by George IV, with people hired to pose in costumes for a few pennies an hour!—What a contrast between a battalion of troops marching into action and one of our independent companies during a holiday! In the middle of a military display and a festive parade full of banners, I saw a boy grab an old tin pan rusting by a wall, balance it on the end of a stick, and spin it, creating the most beautifully elegant curves, capturing attention away from the decorated procession with this surprising beauty.

Another text from the mythologists. The Greeks fabled that Venus was born of the foam of the sea. Nothing interests us which is stark or bounded, but only what streams with life, what is in act or endeavor to reach somewhat beyond. The pleasure a palace or a temple gives the eye, is, that an order and method has been communicated to stones, so that they speak and geometrize, become tender or sublime with expression. Beauty is the moment of transition, as if the form were just ready to flow into other forms. Any fixedness, heaping, or concentration on one feature,—a long nose, a sharp chin, a hump-back,—is the reverse of the flowing, and therefore deformed. Beautiful as is the symmetry of any form, if the form can move, we seek a more excellent symmetry. The interruption of equilibrium stimulates the eye to desire the restoration of symmetry, and to watch the steps through which it is attained. This is the charm of running water, sea-waves, the flight of birds, and the locomotion of animals. This is the theory of dancing, to recover continually in changes the lost equilibrium, not by abrupt and angular, but by gradual and curving movements. I have been told by persons of experience in matters of taste, that the fashions follow a law of gradation, and are never arbitrary. The new mode is always only a step onward in the same direction as the last mode; and a cultivated eye is prepared for and predicts the new fashion. This fact suggests the reason of all mistakes and offence in our own modes. It is necessary in music, when you strike a discord, to let down the ear by an intermediate note or two to the accord again: and many a good experiment, born of good sense, and destined to succeed, fails, only because it is offensively sudden. I suppose, the Parisian milliner who dresses the world from her imperious boudoir will know how to reconcile the Bloomer costume to the eye of mankind, and make it triumphant over Punch himself, by interposing the just gradations. I need not say, how wide the same law ranges; and how much it can be hoped to effect. All that is a little harshly claimed by progressive parties, may easily come to be conceded without question, if this rule be observed. Thus the circumstances may be easily imagined, in which woman may speak, vote, argue causes, legislate, and drive a coach, and all the most naturally in the world, if only it come by degrees. To this streaming or flowing belongs the beauty that all circular movement has; as, the circulation of waters, the circulation of the blood, the periodical motion of planets, the annual wave of vegetation, the action and reaction of Nature: and, if we follow it out, this demand in our thought for an ever-onward action, is the argument for the immortality.

Another text from the mythologists. The Greeks believed that Venus was born from the foam of the sea. We aren’t drawn to things that are rigid or limited, but rather to what is full of life, what is in motion or striving to reach something beyond itself. The pleasure a palace or a temple gives our eyes comes from the way order and structure have been applied to stones, allowing them to communicate and create patterns, becoming gentle or grand with expression. Beauty is the moment of transition, as if the form is about to flow into other forms. Any fixedness, accumulation, or focus on one feature—a long nose, a sharp chin, a hunchback—is the opposite of flow, and therefore seen as deformed. As beautiful as symmetry can be, if a form can move, we seek an even deeper symmetry. The disruption of balance encourages the eye to desire the restoration of symmetry and to observe the process by which it is achieved. This is the allure of flowing water, ocean waves, bird flight, and animal movement. This concept applies to dance as well, where the goal is to continually restore lost balance—not through jarring, sharp movements, but through gentle, flowing ones. I’ve heard from experienced individuals in areas of taste that fashions follow a gradual law and are never random. The new trend always serves as a step forward in the same direction as the last; a cultured eye is prepared for and anticipates the new style. This fact highlights the reasons behind mistakes and reactions in our own trends. In music, when you strike a dissonance, it's important to ease the ear back to harmony with one or two intermediate notes first; many promising ideas, born from good sense and ready to succeed, fail simply because they are too abruptly introduced. I expect that the Parisian milliner, who influences fashion from her influential workspace, will know how to gradually introduce the Bloomer style in a way that won’t offend the public and make it accepted, even overcoming critiques from satirical publications. I don’t need to emphasize how broad this law extends and how much it can potentially achieve. All that is somewhat harshly claimed by progressive movements may easily be accepted without question if this principle is followed. Thus, we can easily envision circumstances where women may speak, vote, argue cases, legislate, and drive a coach, all quite naturally, as long as it happens gradually. This flowing aspect includes the beauty of all circular movements, such as the circulation of water, the blood flow, the periodic movement of planets, the seasonal cycle of nature, the actions and reactions of the natural world: and, if we follow this thread, our instinct for continuous action is the argument for immortality.

One more text from the mythologists is to the same purpose,—Beauty rides on a lion. Beauty rests on necessities. The line of beauty is the result of perfect economy. The cell of the bee is built at that angle which gives the most strength with the least wax; the bone or the quill of the bird gives the most alar strength, with the least weight. "It is the purgation of superfluities," said Michel Angelo. There is not a particle to spare in natural structures. There is a compelling reason in the uses of the plant, for every novelty of color or form: and our art saves material, by more skilful arrangement, and reaches beauty by taking every superfluous ounce that can be spared from a wall, and keeping all its strength in the poetry of columns. In rhetoric, this art of omission is a chief secret of power, and, in general, it is proof of high culture, to say the greatest matters in the simplest way.

One more text from the mythologists is to the same purpose,—Beauty rides on a lion. Beauty relies on essentials. The line of beauty comes from perfect efficiency. The bee's cell is constructed at an angle that provides the most strength with the least wax; the bone or quill of a bird offers maximum strength with minimal weight. "It is the removal of excess," said Michel Angelo. There isn’t a single particle to waste in natural structures. There is a strong reason in the functions of a plant for every new color or shape: our art conserves materials through more skillful arrangements and achieves beauty by eliminating every unnecessary ounce from a wall while maintaining its strength in the artistry of columns. In rhetoric, this art of omission is a key secret of power, and, in general, it's a mark of high culture to express significant ideas in the simplest way.

Veracity first of all, and forever. Rien de beau que le vrai. In all design, art lies in making your object prominent, but there is a prior art in choosing objects that are prominent. The fine arts have nothing casual, but spring from the instincts of the nations that created them.

Truth is paramount, now and always. Nothing is more beautiful than the truth. In all design, art involves highlighting your subject, but there’s an earlier skill in selecting subjects that are already significant. The fine arts are never trivial; they arise from the instincts of the cultures that produced them.

Beauty is the quality which makes to endure. In a house that I know, I have noticed a block of spermaceti lying about closets and mantel-pieces, for twenty years together, simply because the tallow-man gave it the form of a rabbit; and, I suppose, it may continue to be lugged about unchanged for a century. Let an artist scrawl a few lines or figures on the back of a letter, and that scrap of paper is rescued from danger, is put in portfolio, is framed and glazed, and, in proportion to the beauty of the lines drawn, will be kept for centuries. Burns writes a copy of verses, and sends them to a newspaper, and the human race take charge of them that they shall not perish.

Beauty is the quality that helps things last. In a house I know, there’s a block of spermaceti sitting around in closets and on mantelpieces for twenty years, simply because the candle maker shaped it like a rabbit; and I guess it could get passed around unchanged for a hundred years. Let an artist doodle a few lines or sketches on the back of a letter, and that little piece of paper is saved from being thrown away, tucked into a portfolio, framed, and glazed, and, depending on how beautiful the lines are, it will be kept for centuries. Burns writes a poem and sends it to a newspaper, and humanity makes sure it doesn’t disappear.

As the flute is heard farther than the cart, see how surely a beautiful form strikes the fancy of men, and is copied and reproduced without end. How many copies are there of the Belvedere Apollo, the Venus, the Psyche, the Warwick Vase, the Parthenon, and the Temple of Vesta? These are objects of tenderness to all. In our cities, an ugly building is soon removed, and is never repeated, but any beautiful building is copied and improved upon, so that all masons and carpenters work to repeat and preserve the agreeable forms, whilst the ugly ones die out.

As the sound of a flute travels further than that of a cart, notice how a beautiful shape captivates people's imagination and is endlessly copied and recreated. How many replicas exist of the Belvedere Apollo, the Venus, the Psyche, the Warwick Vase, the Parthenon, and the Temple of Vesta? These are cherished by everyone. In our cities, an unattractive building is quickly torn down and never replicated, but any beautiful building gets copied and enhanced, so all builders and craftsmen strive to recreate and maintain those pleasing designs, while the ugly ones fade away.

The felicities of design in art, or in works of Nature, are shadows or forerunners of that beauty which reaches its perfection in the human form. All men are its lovers. Wherever it goes, it creates joy and hilarity, and everything is permitted to it. It reaches its height in woman. "To Eve," say the Mahometans, "God gave two thirds of all beauty." A beautiful woman is a practical poet, taming her savage mate, planting tenderness, hope, and eloquence, in all whom she approaches. Some favors of condition must go with it, since a certain serenity is essential, but we love its reproofs and superiorities. Nature wishes that woman should attract man, yet she often cunningly moulds into her face a little sarcasm, which seems to say, 'Yes, I am willing to attract, but to attract a little better kind of a man than any I yet behold.' French mémoires of the fifteenth century celebrate the name of Pauline de Viguiere, a virtuous and accomplished maiden, who so fired the enthusiasm of her contemporaries, by her enchanting form, that the citizens of her native city of Toulouse obtained the aid of the civil authorities to compel her to appear publicly on the balcony at least twice a week, and, as often as she showed herself, the crowd was dangerous to life. Not less, in England, in the last century, was the fame of the Gunnings, of whom, Elizabeth married the Duke of Hamilton; and Maria, the Earl of Coventry. Walpole says, "the concourse was so great, when the Duchess of Hamilton was presented at court, on Friday, that even the noble crowd in the drawing-room clambered on chairs and tables to look at her. There are mobs at their doors to see them get into their chairs, and people go early to get places at the theatres, when it is known they will be there." "Such crowds," he adds, elsewhere, "flock to see the Duchess of Hamilton, that seven hundred people sat up all night, in and about an inn, in Yorkshire, to see her get into her post-chaise next morning."

The joys of design in art, or in nature, are mere reflections or previews of the beauty that reaches its peak in the human form. Everyone admires it. Wherever it appears, it brings happiness and excitement, and everything is allowed for it. It finds its ultimate expression in women. "To Eve," say the Muslims, "God gave two-thirds of all beauty." A beautiful woman is a practical poet, taming her wild partner, instilling tenderness, hope, and eloquence in everyone she encounters. Some advantages must accompany it, as a certain calmness is essential, but we appreciate its criticism and superiority. Nature intends for women to attract men, yet she often slyly shapes her face with a hint of sarcasm, as if to say, 'Yes, I want to attract, but I’m aiming for a better kind of man than any I see around me.' French mémoires from the fifteenth century celebrate the name of Pauline de Viguiere, a virtuous and talented young woman whose captivating beauty inspired such enthusiasm in her time that the citizens of her hometown, Toulouse, had to ask the authorities to ensure she appeared publicly on her balcony at least twice a week. Whenever she did appear, the crowd became a danger to life. Similarly, in England during the last century, the Gunnings gained fame, with Elizabeth marrying the Duke of Hamilton and Maria marrying the Earl of Coventry. Walpole noted, "the crowd was so large when the Duchess of Hamilton was presented at court on Friday that even the noble guests in the drawing-room climbed on chairs and tables to get a glimpse of her. There are mobs outside their doors waiting to see them get into their carriages, and people arrive early to secure seats at the theaters when it’s known they will be there." He adds elsewhere, "Such crowds gather to see the Duchess of Hamilton that seven hundred people stayed up all night, in and around an inn in Yorkshire, just to watch her get into her coach the next morning."

But why need we console ourselves with the fames of Helen of Argos, or Corinna, or Pauline of Toulouse, or the Duchess of Hamilton? We all know this magic very well, or can divine it. It does not hurt weak eyes to look into beautiful eyes never so long. Women stand related to beautiful Nature around us, and the enamored youth mixes their form with moon and stars, with woods and waters, and the pomp of summer. They heal us of awkwardness by their words and looks. We observe their intellectual influence on the most serious student. They refine and clear his mind; teach him to put a pleasing method into what is dry and difficult. We talk to them, and wish to be listened to; we fear to fatigue them, and acquire a facility of expression which passes from conversation into habit of style.

But why do we need to comfort ourselves with the famous names of Helen of Argos, Corinna, Pauline of Toulouse, or the Duchess of Hamilton? We all know this magic well, or we can sense it. It doesn’t strain weak eyes to look into beautiful eyes for as long as we want. Women are connected to the beautiful nature around us, and lovesick young men blend their forms with the moon and stars, with the woods and waters, and the splendor of summer. They heal our awkwardness with their words and glances. We see their intellectual impact on the most serious students. They refine and clarify his thoughts; they teach him to bring a pleasant structure to what is dry and hard to grasp. We talk to them and want to be heard; we worry about tiring them out, which helps us develop an ease of expression that transitions from conversation into a consistent style.

That Beauty is the normal state, is shown by the perpetual effort of Nature to attain it. Mirabeau had an ugly face on a handsome ground; and we see faces every day which have a good type, but have been marred in the casting: a proof that we are all entitled to beauty, should have been beautiful, if our ancestors had kept the laws,—as every lily and every rose is well. But our bodies do not fit us, but caricature and satirize us. Thus, short legs, which constrain us to short, mincing steps, are a kind of personal insult and contumely to the owner; and long stilts, again, put him at perpetual disadvantage, and force him to stoop to the general level of mankind. Martial ridicules a gentleman of his day whose countenance resembled the face of a swimmer seen under water. Saadi describes a schoolmaster "so ugly and crabbed, that a sight of him would derange the ecstasies of the orthodox." Faces are rarely true to any ideal type, but are a record in sculpture of a thousand anecdotes of whim and folly. Portrait painters say that most faces and forms are irregular and unsymmetrical; have one eye blue, and one gray; the nose not straight; and one shoulder higher than another; the hair unequally distributed, etc. The man is physically as well as metaphysically a thing of shreds and patches, borrowed unequally from good and bad ancestors, and a misfit from the start.

That beauty is the normal state is evident from Nature's constant effort to achieve it. Mirabeau had an unattractive face set against a handsome background, and we see faces every day that have good features but are flawed in some way: proof that we all deserve beauty and should have been attractive if our ancestors had adhered to the laws—just like every lily and rose is perfect. But our bodies often don't fit us; they caricature and mock us. For instance, short legs, which force us to take small, dainty steps, feel like a personal insult to the owner, while long legs can put a person at a disadvantage, making them stoop to the common level of humanity. Martial mocks a gentleman of his time whose face looked like that of a swimmer seen underwater. Saadi describes a schoolmaster "so ugly and grumpy that just seeing him could ruin the joy of the orthodox." Faces rarely align with any ideal type; instead, they reflect countless anecdotes of whim and folly. Portrait painters say that most faces and bodies are irregular and asymmetrical; one eye may be blue while the other is gray, the nose might not be straight, and one shoulder could be higher than the other; hair often looks unevenly distributed, etc. A person is physically, as well as metaphysically, a patchwork of traits, unevenly inherited from both good and bad ancestors, and from the very beginning, they're a misfit.

A beautiful person, among the Greeks, was thought to betray by this sign some secret favor of the immortal gods: and we can pardon pride, when a woman possesses such a figure, that wherever she stands, or moves, or leaves a shadow on the wall, or sits for a portrait to the artist, she confers a favor on the world. And yet—it is not beauty that inspires the deepest passion. Beauty without grace is the hook without the bait. Beauty, without expression, tires. Abbé Ménage said of the President Le Bailleul, "that he was fit for nothing but to sit for his portrait." A Greek epigram intimates that the force of love is not shown by the courting of beauty, but when the like desire is inflamed for one who is ill-favored. And petulant old gentlemen, who have chanced to suffer some intolerable weariness from pretty people, or who have seen cut flowers to some profusion, or who see, after a world of pains have been successfully taken for the costume, how the least mistake in sentiment takes all the beauty out of your clothes,—affirm, that the secret of ugliness consists not in irregularity, but in being uninteresting.

A beautiful person, among the Greeks, was thought to reveal some hidden favor from the immortal gods through their appearance; and we can understand pride when a woman has such a figure that wherever she stands, moves, casts a shadow on the wall, or sits for an artist, she brings something special to the world. And yet—it’s not beauty that sparks the deepest passion. Beauty without grace is like a hook without bait. Beauty without expression becomes tiresome. Abbé Ménage remarked about President Le Bailleul, "that he was fit for nothing but to pose for his portrait." A Greek epigram suggests that the true power of love isn’t shown by pursuing beauty, but when a similar desire ignites for someone who’s not conventionally attractive. Additionally, irritable old gentlemen, who have endured some unbearable boredom from attractive people, or who have seen an excess of cut flowers, or who recognize that after going to great lengths for their outfit, even the smallest mistake in sentiment can ruin the beauty of their clothes,—assert that the essence of ugliness lies not in irregularity, but in being uninteresting.

We love any forms, however ugly, from which great qualities shine. If command, eloquence, art, or invention, exist in the most deformed person, all the accidents that usually displease, please, and raise esteem and wonder higher. The great orator was an emaciated, insignificant person, but he was all brain. Cardinal De Retz says of De Bouillon, "With the physiognomy of an ox, he had the perspicacity of an eagle." It was said of Hooke, the friend of Newton, "he is the most, and promises the least, of any man in England." "Since I am so ugly," said Du Guesclin, "it behooves that I be bold." Sir Philip Sidney, the darling of mankind, Ben Jonson tells us, "was no pleasant man in countenance, his face being spoiled with pimples, and of high blood, and long." Those who have ruled human destinies, like planets, for thousands of years, were not handsome men. If a man can raise a small city to be a great kingdom, can make bread cheap, can irrigate deserts, can join oceans by canals, can subdue steam, can organize victory, can lead the opinions of mankind, can enlarge knowledge, 'tis no matter whether his nose is parallel to his spine, as it ought to be, or whether he has a nose at all: whether his legs are straight, or whether his legs are amputated; his deformities will come to be reckoned ornamental, and advantageous on the whole. This is the triumph of expression, degrading beauty, charming us with a power so fine and friendly and intoxicating, that it makes admired persons insipid, and the thought of passing our lives with them insupportable. There are faces so fluid with expression, so flushed and rippled by the play of thought, that we can hardly find what the mere features really are. When the delicious beauty of lineaments loses its power, it is because a more delicious beauty has appeared; that an interior and durable form has been disclosed. Still, Beauty rides on her lion, as before. Still, "it was for beauty that the world was made." The lives of the Italian artists, who established a despotism of genius amidst the dukes and kings and mobs of their stormy epoch, prove how loyal men in all times are to a finer brain, a finer method, than their own. If a man can cut such a head on his stone gate-post as shall draw and keep a crowd about it all day, by its beauty, good nature, and inscrutable meaning:—if a man can build a plain cottage with such symmetry, as to make all the fine palaces look cheap and vulgar; can take such advantage of Nature, that all her powers serve him; making use of geometry, instead of expense; tapping a mountain for his water-jet; causing the sun and moon to seem only the decorations of his estate; this is still the legitimate dominion of beauty.

We appreciate any form, no matter how unattractive, if it showcases great qualities. If someone possesses authority, eloquence, artistry, or creativity, even in the most unconventional appearance, all the flaws that usually turn people off can actually become endearing, elevating admiration and awe. The great orator was a thin, unremarkable person, but he was full of intellect. Cardinal De Retz described De Bouillon as "having the face of an ox but the insight of an eagle." It was said of Hooke, who was a friend of Newton, that "he has the most and promises the least of any man in England." Du Guesclin remarked, "Since I'm so unattractive, I need to be bold." Sir Philip Sidney, loved by many, was described by Ben Jonson as "not pleasant to look at, with a face marred by pimples, tall and of noble blood." Those who have shaped human destinies, like planets, for thousands of years were not conventionally handsome. If a man can elevate a small town to a great kingdom, make bread affordable, irrigate deserts, connect oceans with canals, master steam, organize victory, lead public opinion, and expand knowledge, it doesn’t matter if his nose is crooked or if he has no nose at all; whether his legs are straight or amputated; his imperfections will eventually be seen as embellishments that add value. This is the victory of expression, diminishing the importance of beauty while captivating us with a charm that’s so powerful and inviting that it makes us see admired individuals as dull, making the thought of spending our lives with them unbearable. Some faces are so animated with expression, so alive with emotion, that it’s hard to even recognize their basic features. When the delightful beauty of a face loses its allure, it’s often because a deeper, more enduring beauty has emerged. Nevertheless, Beauty continues to reign supreme, just as before. "It was for beauty that the world was made." The lives of Italian artists, who created a genius-led dominance amid the nobles, kings, and chaos of their tumultuous time, demonstrate how loyal people have always been to superior intellect and craft than their own. If a person can sculpt an impressive head for their gatepost that attracts and keeps a crowd drawn by its beauty, charm, and mysterious meaning; if they can build a simple cottage with such symmetry that it makes all the grand palaces seem cheap and common; can harness nature so that all her powers work for them, using geometry instead of expense; tapping into a mountain for their water feature; making the sun and moon appear to be mere decorations on their property; this is still the rightful domain of beauty.

The radiance of the human form, though sometimes astonishing, is only a burst of beauty for a few years or a few months, at the perfection of youth, and in most, rapidly declines. But we remain lovers of it, only transferring our interest to interior excellence. And it is not only admirable in singular and salient talents, but also in the world of manners.

The beauty of the human body, while often breathtaking, is just a flash of attractiveness for a few years or even months, peaking during youth, and for most people, it quickly fades. But we still appreciate it, shifting our focus to inner qualities. This admiration isn't just for unique and standout talents, but also for how people carry themselves.

But the sovereign attribute remains to be noted. Things are pretty, graceful, rich, elegant, handsome, but, until they speak to the imagination, not yet beautiful. This is the reason why beauty is still escaping out of all analysis. It is not yet possessed, it cannot be handled. Proclus says, "it swims on the light of forms." It is properly not in the form, but in the mind. It instantly deserts possession, and flies to an object in the horizon. If I could put my hand on the north star, would it be as beautiful? The sea is lovely, but when we bathe in it, the beauty forsakes all the near water. For the imagination and senses cannot be gratified at the same time. Wordsworth rightly speaks of "a light that never was on sea or land," meaning, that it was supplied by the observer, and the Welsh bard warns his countrywomen, that

But the key quality still needs to be pointed out. Things can be pretty, graceful, rich, elegant, or handsome, but until they captivate the imagination, they aren't truly beautiful. This is why beauty continues to elude definition. It isn't something you can own or grasp. Proclus says, "it swims on the light of forms." It's not really in the form itself but in the mind. It quickly slips away from possession and moves to something on the horizon. If I could reach out and grab the North Star, would it still be beautiful? The sea is stunning, but once we immerse ourselves in it, the beauty disappears from the water around us. That's because the imagination and senses can't be satisfied at the same time. Wordsworth correctly refers to "a light that never was on sea or land," meaning it comes from the observer, and the Welsh bard cautions his countrywomen that

—"half of their charms with Cadwallon shall die."
—"half of their charms with Cadwallon will be lost."

The new virtue which constitutes a thing beautiful, is a certain cosmical quality, or, a power to suggest relation to the whole world, and so lift the object out of a pitiful individuality. Every natural feature,—sea, sky, rainbow, flowers, musical tone,—has in it somewhat which is not private, but universal, speaks of that central benefit which is the soul of Nature, and thereby is beautiful. And, in chosen men and women, I find somewhat in form, speech, and manners, which is not of their person and family, but of a humane, catholic, and spiritual character, and we love them as the sky. They have a largeness of suggestion, and their face and manners carry a certain grandeur, like time and justice.

The new quality that makes something beautiful is a kind of cosmic essence, or a power to connect to the entire world, elevating the object beyond being just an individual thing. Every natural element—like the sea, sky, rainbow, flowers, and music—contains something that isn’t private but universal, reflecting the central goodness that is the essence of Nature, and that’s what makes it beautiful. In extraordinary men and women, I notice qualities in their appearance, speech, and behavior that aren’t just tied to their personal backgrounds or families, but are humane, inclusive, and spiritual, which is why we admire them like we do the sky. They convey a broad sense of meaning, and their presence and demeanor carry a kind of majesty, reminiscent of time and fairness.

The feat of the imagination is in showing the convertibility of every thing into every other thing. Facts which had never before left their stark common sense, suddenly figure as Eleusinian mysteries. My boots and chair and candlestick are fairies in disguise, meteors and constellations. All the facts in Nature are nouns of the intellect, and make the grammar of the eternal language. Every word has a double, treble, or centuple use and meaning, What! has my stove and pepper-pot a false bottom! I cry you mercy, good shoe-box! I did not know you were a jewel-case. Chaff and dust begin to sparkle, and are clothed about with immortality. And there is a joy in perceiving the representative or symbolic character of a fact, which no bare fact or event can ever give. There are no days in life so memorable as those which vibrated to some stroke of the imagination.

The power of imagination lies in showing how everything can transform into something else. Facts that once seemed straightforward suddenly reveal themselves as profound mysteries. My boots, chair, and candlestick are fairies in disguise, meteors, and constellations. All the facts in nature are like the nouns of the mind, forming the grammar of an eternal language. Every word has multiple uses and meanings. What? Does my stove and pepper shaker have a hidden surprise? I apologize, dear shoe-box! I had no idea you were a treasure chest. Chaff and dust start to shimmer, adorned with a sense of immortality. There’s a joy in recognizing the representative or symbolic nature of a fact that no simple fact or event can provide. No moments in life are as memorable as those touched by imagination.

The poets are quite right in decking their mistresses with the spoils of the landscape, flower-gardens, gems, rainbows, flushes of morning, and stars of night, since all beauty points at identity, and whatsoever thing does not express to me the sea and sky, day and night, is somewhat forbidden and wrong. Into every beautiful object, there enters somewhat immeasurable and divine, and just as much into form bounded by outlines, like mountains on the horizon, as into tones of music, or depths of space. Polarized light showed the secret architecture of bodies; and when the second-sight of the mind is opened, now one color or form or gesture, and now another, has a pungency, as if a more interior ray had been emitted, disclosing its deep holdings in the frame of things.

The poets are absolutely right in adorning their lovers with the treasures of the landscape—flower gardens, gems, rainbows, the brightness of morning, and stars at night—because all beauty reflects identity. Anything that doesn’t express the sea and sky, day and night, feels somewhat restricted and wrong. Every beautiful object contains something immeasurable and divine, just as much in shapes defined by outlines, like mountains on the horizon, as in musical notes or the depths of space. Polarized light reveals the hidden structure of things; and when the mind's second sight is awakened, one color or form or gesture, and then another, becomes more striking, as if a deeper light has been released, revealing its profound connections within the essence of things.

The laws of this translation we do not know, or why one feature or gesture enchants, why one word or syllable intoxicates, but the fact is familiar that the fine touch of the eye, or a grace of manners, or a phrase of poetry, plants wings at our shoulders; as if the Divinity, in his approaches, lifts away mountains of obstruction, and deigns to draw a truer line, which the mind knows and owns. This is that haughty force of beauty, "vis superba formæ" which the poets praise,—under calm and precise outline, the immeasurable and divine: Beauty hiding all wisdom and power in its calm sky.

We don’t fully understand the rules of this translation, or why a certain feature or gesture captivates us, or why one word or syllable can feel so intoxicating. But it’s clear that the delicate touch of the eye, a graceful manner, or a beautiful phrase can give us wings; as if the Divine, in drawing closer to us, removes mountains of obstacles and chooses to reveal a truer path that our mind recognizes and embraces. This is the proud power of beauty, "vis superba formæ" that poets celebrate—under a calm and precise outline lies something immeasurable and divine: beauty concealing all wisdom and strength in its serene sky.

All high beauty has a moral element in it, and I find the antique sculpture as ethical as Marcus Antoninus: and the beauty ever in proportion to the depth of thought. Gross and obscure natures, however decorated, seem impure shambles; but character gives splendor to youth, and awe to wrinkled skin and gray hairs. An adorer of truth we cannot choose but obey, and the woman who has shared with us the moral sentiment,—her locks must appear to us sublime. Thus there is a climbing scale of culture, from the first agreeable sensation which a sparkling gem or a scarlet stain affords the eye, up through fair outlines and details of the landscape, features of the human face and form, signs and tokens of thought and character in manners, up to the ineffable mysteries of the intellect. Wherever we begin, thither our steps tend: an ascent from the joy of a horse in his trappings, up to the perception of Newton, that the globe on which we ride is only a larger apple falling from a larger tree; up to the perception of Plato, that globe and universe are rude and early expressions of an all-dissolving Unity,—the first stair on the scale to the temple of the Mind.

All true beauty has a moral aspect, and I find ancient sculpture as ethical as Marcus Antoninus: beauty is always linked to the depth of thought. Crude and unclear natures, no matter how adorned, seem like unhygienic messes; but character adds brilliance to youth and dignity to age with wrinkles and gray hair. We cannot help but follow someone who loves the truth, and a woman who shares our moral sentiment appears to us as sublime. There is a ladder of culture, starting from the simple pleasure of a sparkling gem or a vivid color catching our eye, moving through the graceful shapes and details of landscapes, the features of the human face and form, signs of thought and character in behavior, all the way to the profound mysteries of the intellect. No matter where we start, that is where we aim to go: an upward journey from the joy of a horse in its gear to Newton's realization that the globe we stand on is just a bigger apple falling from a larger tree; reaching toward Plato's insight that both our world and the universe are rough early forms of a complete Unity—the first step on the ladder to the temple of the Mind.

IX.

IX.

ILLUSIONS

Delusions

Flow, flow the waves hated,
Accursed, adored,
The waves of mutation:
No anchorage is.
Sleep is not, death is not;
Who seem to die live.
House you were born in,
Friends of your spring-time,
Old man and young maid,
Day's toil and its guerdon,
They are all vanishing,
Fleeing to fables,
Cannot be moored.
See the stars through them,
Through treacherous marbles.
Know, the stars yonder,
The stars everlasting,
Are fugitive also,
And emulate, vaulted,
The lambent heat-lightning,
And fire-fly's flight.
When thou dost return
On the wave's circulation,
Beholding the shimmer,
The wild dissipation,
And, out of endeavor
To change and to flow,
The gas become solid,
And phantoms and nothings
Return to be things,
And endless imbroglio
Is law and the world,—
Then first shalt thou know,
That in the wild turmoil,
Horsed on the Proteus,
Thou ridest to power,
And to endurance.
Flow, flow the waves we despise,
Cursed yet cherished,
The waves of change:
There's no safe harbor.
There's no sleep, no death;
Those who seem to die live on.
The home you grew up in,
Friends from your early days,
Old men and young women,
The labor of the day and its reward,
They're all fading away,
Running towards myths,
Unable to be anchored.
See the stars through them,
Through deceitful marbles.
Know that the stars above,
The eternal stars,
Are fleeting too,
And mimic, arched,
The flickering heat lightning,
And the flight of fireflies.
When you return
On the waves' cycle,
Seeing the sparkle,
The wild dispersal,
And, from the effort
To change and flow,
Gas becomes solid,
And shadows and voids
Turn back into things,
And endless confusion
Is both law and the world,—
Then you'll truly understand,
That in the wild chaos,
Riding on the Proteus,
You ride towards power,
And towards endurance.

ILLUSIONS.

Illusions.

Some years ago, in company with an agreeable party, I spent a long summer day in exploring the Mammoth Cave in Kentucky. We traversed, through spacious galleries affording a solid masonry foundation for the town and county overhead, the six or eight black miles from the mouth of the cavern to the innermost recess which tourists visit,—a niche or grotto made of one seamless stalactite, and called, I believe, Serena's Bower. I lost the light of one day. I saw high domes, and bottomless pits; heard the voice of unseen waterfalls; paddled three quarters of a mile in the deep Echo River, whose waters are peopled with the blind fish; crossed the streams "Lethe" and "Styx;" plied with music and guns the echoes in these alarming galleries; saw every form of stalagmite and stalactite in the sculptured and fretted chambers,—icicle, orange-flower, acanthus, grapes, and snowball. We shot Bengal lights into the vaults and groins of the sparry cathedrals, and examined all the masterpieces which the four combined engineers, water, limestone, gravitation, and time, could make in the dark.

Some years ago, with a pleasant group, I spent a long summer day exploring Mammoth Cave in Kentucky. We walked through spacious galleries that provided a solid masonry foundation for the town and county above, covering six or eight dark miles from the cave entrance to the furthest point tourists visit—a niche or grotto made of a single seamless stalactite, which I believe is called Serena's Bower. I lost track of time during that day. I saw towering domes and bottomless pits, heard the sound of unseen waterfalls, paddled three-quarters of a mile in the deep Echo River, whose waters are home to blind fish; crossed the streams "Lethe" and "Styx;" filled these eerie galleries with music and gunshots to play with the echoes; and saw all kinds of stalagmites and stalactites in the intricately carved chambers—icicles, orange flowers, acanthus leaves, grapes, and snowballs. We shot Bengal lights into the vaults and arches of the sparkling cathedrals, examining all the masterpieces that the four combined forces—water, limestone, gravity, and time—could create in the dark.

The mysteries and scenery of the cave had the same dignity that belongs to all natural objects, and which shames the fine things to which we foppishly compare them. I remarked, especially, the mimetic habit, with which Nature, on new instruments, hums her old tunes, making night to mimic day, and chemistry to ape vegetation. But I then took notice, and still chiefly remember, that the best thing which the cave had to offer was an illusion. On arriving at what is called the "Star-Chamber," our lamps were taken from us by the guide, and extinguished or put aside, and, on looking upwards, I saw or seemed to see the night heaven thick with stars glimmering more or less brightly over our heads, and even what seemed a comet flaming among them. All the party were touched with astonishment and pleasure. Our musical friends sung with much feeling a pretty song, "The stars are in the quiet sky," &c., and I sat down on the rocky floor to enjoy the serene picture. Some crystal specks in the black ceiling high overhead, reflecting the light of a half-hid lamp, yielded this magnificent effect.

The mysteries and beauty of the cave had the same dignity that all natural things possess, which makes the fancy things we often compare them to seem trivial in comparison. I especially noticed how Nature, in new settings, plays her old songs, causing night to imitate day and chemistry to mimic plant life. But what I remember most vividly is that the best thing the cave offered was an illusion. When we reached what is called the "Star-Chamber," the guide took our lamps away, turning them off or setting them aside, and when I looked up, I saw—or thought I saw—the night sky filled with stars twinkling brightly above us, and even what seemed like a comet blazing among them. Everyone in the group was filled with awe and delight. Our musical friends sang a lovely song, "The stars are in the quiet sky," and I sat down on the rocky floor to soak in the peaceful scene. Some tiny crystal spots on the dark ceiling above, reflecting the light of a dim lamp, created this stunning effect.

I own, I did not like the cave so well for eking out its sublimities with this theatrical trick. But I have had many experiences like it, before and since; and we must be content to be pleased without too curiously analyzing the occasions. Our conversation with Nature is not just what it seems. The cloud-rack, the sunrise and sunset glories, rainbows, and northern lights are not quite so spheral as our childhood thought them; and the part our organization plays in them is too large. The senses interfere everywhere, and mix their own structure with all they report of. Once, we fancied the earth a plane, and stationary. In admiring the sunset, we do not yet deduct the rounding, coordinating, pictorial powers of the eye.

I have to say, I didn't really like the cave for trying to enhance its beauty with that theatrical approach. But I've had many experiences like that, both before and after; and we have to be okay with enjoying things without overanalyzing them. Our relationship with Nature isn't exactly what it appears to be. The clouds, the beauty of sunrises and sunsets, rainbows, and northern lights aren't as perfect as we imagined in childhood; and the role our senses play in perceiving them is much bigger than we think. Our senses interfere everywhere, mixing their own makeup with everything they report. Once, we believed the Earth was flat and unchanging. When we admire a sunset, we still don't account for the rounding, coordinating, and visual abilities of our eyes.

The same interference from our organization creates the most of our pleasure and pain. Our first mistake is the belief that the circumstance gives the joy which we give to the circumstance. Life is an ecstasy. Life is sweet as nitrous oxide; and the fisherman dripping all day over a cold pond, the switchman at the railway intersection, the farmer in the field, the negro in the rice-swamp, the fop in the street, the hunter in the woods, the barrister with the jury, the belle at the ball, all ascribe a certain pleasure to their employment, which they themselves give it. Health and appetite impart the sweetness to sugar, bread, and meat. We fancy that our civilization has got on far, but we still come back to our primers.

The same influence from our organization brings us most of our joy and pain. Our first mistake is thinking that our circumstances provide the joy that we actually bring to those circumstances. Life is exhilarating. Life is as sweet as nitrous oxide; and whether it’s the fisherman spending all day by a cold pond, the switchman at a train intersection, the farmer in the field, the worker in the rice field, the trendy person on the street, the hunter in the woods, the lawyer with the jury, or the beautiful person at the dance, they all attribute a certain pleasure to their work, which they create themselves. Health and appetite give sweetness to sugar, bread, and meat. We believe that our civilization has progressed significantly, but we still return to our basics.

We live by our imaginations, by our admirations, by our sentiments. The child walks amid heaps of illusions, which he does not like to have disturbed. The boy, how sweet to him is his fancy! how dear the story of barons and battles! What a hero he is, whilst he feeds on his heroes! What a debt is his to imaginative books! He has no better friend or influence, than Scott, Shakspeare, Plutarch, and Homer. The man lives to other objects, but who dare affirm that they are more real? Even the prose of the streets is full of refractions. In the life of the dreariest alderman, fancy enters into all details, and colors them with rosy hue. He imitates the air and actions of people whom he admires, and is raised in his own eyes. He pays a debt quicker to a rich man than to a poor man. He wishes the bow and compliment of some leader in the state, or in society; weighs what he says; perhaps he never comes nearer to him for that, but dies at last better contented for this amusement of his eyes and his fancy.

We live by our imaginations, our admirations, and our feelings. The child walks among piles of illusions, which he doesn't want disrupted. To the boy, his imagination is so sweet! How precious the tales of knights and battles are! He becomes a hero while he’s lost in stories of other heroes! He owes so much to imaginative books! He has no better friends or influences than Scott, Shakespeare, Plutarch, and Homer. Adults live for different things, but who can truly claim those are more real? Even the everyday conversations on the streets are full of distortions. In the life of the most boring city official, imagination touches every detail and colors them with a rosy tint. He mimics the demeanor and actions of people he admires, elevating himself in his own eyes. He pays more attention to a rich man than to a poor one. He longs for the approval and acknowledgment of some leader in politics or society, carefully considering their words; perhaps he never gets closer to them, but in the end, he feels more satisfied because of this entertainment for his eyes and imagination.

The world rolls, the din of life is never hushed. In London, in Paris, in Boston, in San Francisco, the carnival, the masquerade is at its height. Nobody drops his domino. The unities, the fictions of the piece it would be an impertinence to break. The chapter of fascinations is very long. Great is paint; nay, God is the painter; and we rightly accuse the critic who destroys too many illusions. Society does not love its unmaskers. It was wittily, if somewhat bitterly, said by D'Alembert, "qu'un état de vapeur était un état trés fâchieux, parcequ'il nous faisait voir les choses comme elles sont." I find men victims of illusion in all parts of life. Children, youths, adults, and old men, all are led by one bawble or another. Yoganidra, the goddess of illusion, Proteus, or Momus, or Gylfi's Mocking,—for the Power has many names,—is stronger than the Titans, stronger than Apollo. Few have overheard the gods, or surprised their secret. Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. All is riddle, and the key to a riddle is another riddle. There are as many pillows of illusion as flakes in a snow-storm. We wake from one dream into another dream. The toys, to be sure, are various, and are graduated in refinement to the quality of the dupe. The intellectual man requires a fine bait; the sots are easily amused. But everybody is drugged with his own frenzy, and the pageant marches at all hours, with music and banner and badge.

The world turns, and the noise of life never fades. In London, in Paris, in Boston, in San Francisco, the carnival, the masquerade is at its peak. Nobody reveals their true self. The rules and tales of the show are too important to disrupt. The list of fascinations is very long. Great is art; indeed, God is the artist; and we rightly criticize those who shatter too many illusions. Society doesn't appreciate its truth-tellers. It was wittily, if somewhat bitterly, said by D'Alembert, "that a vapor state is a very unfortunate state because it shows us things as they really are." I find men are victims of illusions in all aspects of life. Children, teenagers, adults, and the elderly, all are led by one trinket or another. Yoganidra, the goddess of illusion, Proteus, or Momus, or Gylfi's Mocking—because this Power has many names—is stronger than the Titans, stronger than Apollo. Few have ever listened to the gods or discovered their secrets. Life is a series of lessons that must be experienced to be understood. Everything is a riddle, and the key to a riddle is another riddle. There are as many pillows of illusion as there are flakes in a snowstorm. We wake from one dream into another. The toys, of course, vary greatly and are tailored to the sophistication of the naive. The thoughtful person requires a finer lure; the fools are easily entertained. But everyone is intoxicated by their own frenzy, and the parade continues at all hours, with music, banners, and badges.

Amid the joyous troop who give in to the charivari, comes now and then a sad-eyed boy, whose eyes lack the requisite refractions to clothe the show in due glory, and who is afflicted with a tendency to trace home the glittering miscellany of fruits and flowers to one root. Science is a search after identity, and the scientific whim is lurking in all corners. At the State Fair, a friend of mine complained that all the varieties of fancy pears in our orchards seem to have been selected by somebody who had a whim for a particular kind of pear, and only cultivated such as had that perfume; they were all alike. And I remember the quarrel of another youth with the confectioners, that, when he racked his wit to choose the best comfits in the shops, in all the endless varieties of sweetmeat he could only find three flavors, or two. What then? Pears and cakes are good for something; and because you, unluckily, have an eye or nose too keen, why need you spoil the comfort which the rest of us find in them? I knew a humorist, who, in a good deal of rattle, had a grain or two of sense. He shocked the company by maintaining that the attributes of God were two,—power and risibility; and that it was the duty of every pious man to keep up the comedy. And I have known gentlemen of great stake in the community, but whose sympathies were cold,—presidents of colleges, and governors, and senators,—who held themselves bound to sign every temperance pledge, and act with Bible societies, and missions, and peace-makers, and cry Hist-a-boy! to every good dog. We must not carry comity too far, but we all have kind impulses in this direction. When the boys come into my yard for leave to gather horse-chestnuts, I own I enter into Nature's game, and affect to grant the permission reluctantly, fearing that any moment they will find out the imposture of that showy chaff. But this tenderness is quite unnecessary; the enchantments are laid on very thick. Their young life is thatched with them. Bare and grim to tears is the lot of the children in the hovel I saw yesterday; yet not the less they hung it round with frippery romance, like the children of the happiest fortune, and talked of "the dear cottage where so many joyful hours had flown." Well, this thatching of hovels is the custom of the country. Women, more than all, are the element and kingdom of illusion. Being fascinated, they fascinate. They see through Claude-Lorraines. And how dare any one, if he could, pluck away the coulisses, stage effects, and ceremonies, by which they live? Too pathetic, too pitiable, is the region of affection, and its atmosphere always liable to mirage.

Amid the cheerful group who join in the festivities, there sometimes appears a sad-eyed boy, whose eyes don't capture the right reflections to enhance the spectacle, and who struggles to trace the dazzling array of fruits and flowers back to a single origin. Science seeks to identify things, and that scientific curiosity lurks everywhere. At the State Fair, a friend of mine complained that all the different types of fancy pears in our orchards seemed chosen by someone with a specific preference for a certain pear type, cultivating only those that had that particular scent; they all looked alike. I also remember another young man arguing with the candy makers, saying that when he tried to choose the best sweets in the shops, he could only find two or three flavors among the endless varieties of treats. So what? Pears and cakes serve a purpose; just because you happen to have a sharper eye or nose, why ruin the enjoyment the rest of us find in them? I knew a humorist who, despite his banter, had some sense. He shocked everyone by insisting that God's two main attributes were power and humor; and that it was every pious person's duty to keep up the comedy. I've also known prominent figures in the community—college presidents, governors, and senators—whose sympathies were cold, yet felt obligated to sign every temperance pledge and join Bible societies, missions, and peace movements, while cheerfully calling out Hist-a-boy! to every good dog. We shouldn't take civility too far, but we all have kind impulses in that direction. When boys come into my yard asking to gather horse-chestnuts, I admit I play along with Nature’s game and pretend to grant permission reluctantly, fearing they’ll figure out the facade of that flashy chaff. But this hesitance is totally unnecessary; the enchantments are quite abundant. Their young lives are filled with them. The situation is stark and tearful for the children in the hovel I saw yesterday; yet they still draped it in a fanciful romance, like the luckiest kids, talking about "the dear cottage where so many joyful hours had passed." Well, this embellishment of hovels is a common practice. Women, more than anyone, embody and create illusion. Being captivated, they captivate others. They see through the lens of Claude-Lorraines. And how could anyone dare, if they could, strip away the coulisses, stage effects, and rituals that give their lives meaning? The territory of love is too emotional, too desperate, and its atmosphere is always prone to mirage.

We are not very much to blame for our bad marriages. We live amid hallucinations; and this especial trap is laid to trip up our feet with, and all are tripped up first or last. But the mighty Mother who had been so sly with us, as if she felt that she owed us some indemnity, insinuates into the Pandora-box of marriage some deep and serious benefits, and some great joys. We find a delight in the beauty and happiness of children, that makes the heart too big for the body. In the worst-assorted connections there is ever some mixture of true marriage. Teague and his jade get some just relations of mutual respect, kindly observation, and fostering of each other, learn something, and would carry themselves wiselier, if they were now to begin.

We aren't entirely to blame for our bad marriages. We live in a world full of illusions, and this particular trap is set to trip us up, and we all end up stumbling at some point. But the powerful Mother, who has played tricks on us, seems to think she owes us something. She sneaks some deep and serious benefits, along with great joys, into the Pandora's box of marriage. We experience overwhelming delight in the beauty and happiness of our children that makes our hearts feel too big for our bodies. Even in the worst combinations, there's always some element of a real marriage. Teague and his partner find some form of mutual respect, kindness, and support, learn a thing or two, and would act more wisely if they were to start over.

'Tis fine for us to point at one or another fine madman, as if there were any exempts. The scholar in his library is none. I, who have all my life heard any number of orations and debates, read poems and miscellaneous books, conversed with many geniuses, am still the victim of any new page; and, if Marmaduke, or Hugh, or Moosehead, or any other, invent a new style or mythology, I fancy that the world will be all brave and right, if dressed in these colors, which I had not thought of. Then at once I will daub with this new paint; but it will not stick. 'Tis like the cement which the peddler sells at the door; he makes broken crockery hold with it, but you can never buy of him a bit of the cement which will make it hold when he is gone.

It's easy for us to point out one or another crazy person, as if anyone is truly exempt. The scholar in his library isn't. I, who have spent my whole life listening to countless speeches and debates, reading poems and various books, and talking to many brilliant minds, still fall for any new page; and if Marmaduke, or Hugh, or Moosehead, or anyone else comes up with a new style or mythology, I convince myself that the world will be amazing and right if it wears these colors that I hadn't thought of. Then right away, I'll splash this new paint on, but it won't stick. It's like the glue that the peddler sells at the door; he gets broken pottery to hold together with it, but you can never buy any of the glue from him that will make it stick once he's gone.

Men who make themselves felt in the world avail themselves of a certain fate in their constitution, which they know how to use. But they never deeply interest us, unless they lift a corner of the curtain, or betray never so slightly their penetration of what is behind it. 'Tis the charm of practical men, that outside of their practicality are a certain poetry and play, as if they led the good horse Power by the bridle, and preferred to walk, though they can ride so fiercely. Bonaparte is intellectual, as well as Cæsar; and the best soldiers, sea-captains, and railway men have a gentleness, when off duty; a good-natured admission that there are illusions, and who shall say that he is not their sport? We stigmatize the cast-iron fellows, who cannot so detach themselves, as "dragon-ridden," "thunder-stricken," and fools of fate, with whatever powers endowed.

Men who make a significant impact in the world take advantage of a certain fate in their nature that they know how to harness. However, they don’t truly engage us unless they reveal a glimpse behind the scenes or hint at their understanding of what lies beneath. The appeal of practical individuals is that alongside their practicality, there’s a certain poetry and playfulness; it’s as if they guide the strong horse of Power by the reins and prefer to walk, even though they can ride fiercely. Bonaparte was both intellectual and like Caesar; the best soldiers, naval captains, and railroad workers exhibit a gentleness when they’re not on duty—a friendly acknowledgment of the illusions that exist, and who can say they aren’t part of the game? We label the rigid individuals, who can’t detach themselves, as "dragon-ridden," "thunder-stricken," and victims of fate, no matter what abilities they possess.

Since our tuition is through emblems and indirections, 'tis well to know that there is method in it, a fixed scale, and rank above rank in the phantasms. We begin low with coarse masks, and rise to the most subtle and beautiful. The red men told Columbus, "they had an herb which took away fatigue;" but he found the illusion of "arriving from the east at the Indies" more composing to his lofty spirit than any tobacco. Is not our faith in the impenetrability of matter more sedative than narcotics? You play with jackstraws, balls, bowls, horse and gun, estates and politics; but there are finer games before you. Is not time a pretty toy? Life will show you masks that are worth all your carnivals. Yonder mountain must migrate into your mind. The fine star-dust and nebulous blur in Orion, "the portentous year of Mizar and Alcor," must come down and be dealt with in your household thought. What if you shall come to discern that the play and playground of all this pompous history are radiations from yourself, and that the sun borrows his beams? What terrible questions we are learning to ask! The former men believed in magic, by which temples, cities, and men were swallowed up, and all trace of them gone. We are coming on the secret of a magic which sweeps out of men's minds all vestige of theism and beliefs which they and their fathers held and were framed upon.

Since our education comes through symbols and indirect ways, it's good to know that there’s a method to it, a set scale, and hierarchy among the illusions. We start with crude masks and climb to the most refined and beautiful. The Native Americans told Columbus that they had a herb that relieved fatigue; however, he discovered that the idea of “arriving from the east at the Indies” calmed his lofty spirit more than any tobacco could. Isn’t our belief in the solidity of matter more soothing than narcotics? You play with pick-up sticks, balls, bowls, horses and guns, property and politics; but there are more profound games ahead of you. Isn’t time a nice little toy? Life will show you masks that are more valuable than all your festivals. That distant mountain must find its way into your mind. The fine stardust and fuzzy glow in Orion, “the significant year of Mizar and Alcor,” must come down and be pondered in your everyday thoughts. What if you discover that the games and pastimes of all this grand history are reflections of yourself, and that the sun borrows its light? What intense questions we are learning to ask! The people of the past believed in magic, which swallowed up temples, cities, and individuals, leaving no trace behind. We are beginning to uncover a kind of magic that clears away all signs of theism and beliefs that they and their ancestors held and were built upon.

There are deceptions of the senses, deceptions of the passions, and the structural, beneficent illusions of sentiment and of the intellect. There is the illusion of love, which attributes to the beloved person all which that person shares with his or her family, sex, age, or condition, nay, with the human mind itself. 'Tis these which the lover loves, and Anna Matilda gets the credit of them. As if one shut up always in a tower, with one window, through which the face of heaven and earth could be seen, should fancy that all the marvels he beheld belonged to that window. There is the illusion of time, which is very deep; who has disposed of it? or come to the conviction that what seems the succession of thought is only the distribution of wholes into causal series? The intellect sees that every atom carries the whole of Nature; that the mind opens to omnipotence; that, in the endless striving and ascents, the metamorphosis is entire, so that the soul doth not know itself in its own act, when that act is perfected. There is illusion that shall deceive even the elect. There is illusion that shall deceive even the performer of the miracle. Though he make his body, he denies that he makes it. Though the world exist from thought, thought is daunted in presence of the world. One after the other we accept the mental laws, still resisting those which follow, which however must be accepted. But all our concessions only compel us to new profusion. And what avails it that science has come to treat space and time as simply forms of thought, and the material world as hypothetical, and withal our pretension of property and even of self-hood are fading with the rest, if, at last, even our thoughts are not finalities; but the incessant flowing and ascension reach these also, and each thought which yesterday was a finality, to-day is yielding to a larger generalization?

There are tricks our senses play on us, emotional deceptions, and the helpful illusions created by feelings and thought. There’s the illusion of love, which makes us attribute to the person we adore everything they share with their family, gender, age, or status, even with humanity as a whole. It’s these things that the lover cherishes, while Anna Matilda gets the credit for them. It’s like someone who’s always locked in a tower with a single window, believing that all the wonders they see belong to that window. There’s a deep illusion regarding time; who has figured it out? Or come to the realization that what seems to be a flow of thought is just a way of organizing whole ideas into causal sequences? The mind understands that every tiny part holds the entirety of Nature; that the mind connects to unlimited potential; that, through endless striving and rising, the transformation is complete, so that the soul doesn’t recognize itself in its own actions when those actions are fulfilled. There are illusions that will mislead even the most discerning. There are illusions that will deceive even the one performing the miracle. Though he creates his own body, he denies that he truly does so. Even if the world is born from thought, thought feels overwhelmed in the face of reality. One by one, we accept the mental rules, while still resisting those that come afterward, even though we must accept them. But all our agreements only lead us to more abundance. And what’s the point of science treating space and time as just forms of thought, and the physical world as hypothetical, if our claims of ownership and even our sense of self are fading just like everything else? In the end, even our thoughts aren’t absolutes; instead, the continuous flow and growth touch these as well, and each thought that was once an absolute yesterday is today yielding to a broader understanding.

With such volatile elements to work in, 'tis no wonder if our estimates are loose and floating. We must work and affirm, but we have no guess of the value of what we say or do. The cloud is now as big as your hand, and now it covers a county. That story of Thor, who was set to drain the drinking-horn in Asgard, and to wrestle with the old woman, and to run with the runner Lok, and presently found that he had been drinking up the sea, and wrestling with Time, and racing with Thought, describes us who are contending, amid these seeming trifles, with the supreme energies of Nature. We fancy we have fallen into bad company and squalid condition, low debts, shoe-bills, broken glass to pay for, pots to buy, butcher's meat, sugar, milk, and coal. 'Set me some great task, ye gods! and I will show my spirit.' 'Not so,' says the good Heaven; 'plod and plough, vamp your old coats and hats, weave a shoestring; great affairs and the best wine by and by.' Well, 'tis all phantasm; and if we weave a yard of tape in all humility, and as well as we can, long hereafter we shall see it was no cotton tape at all, but some galaxy which we braided, and that the threads were Time and Nature.

With such unpredictable elements at play, it’s no surprise that our estimates are uncertain and shifting. We need to keep working and making affirmations, but we can't predict the true value of what we say or do. The cloud is now as small as your hand, and suddenly it covers a whole region. That story about Thor, who set out to empty the drinking-horn in Asgard, wrestle with the old woman, and race against Lok, only to discover he was actually drinking up the sea, wrestling with Time, and racing with Thought, reflects our struggle as we grapple with the immense forces of Nature amidst these seemingly insignificant details. We feel like we've fallen into bad company and a grim situation, with minor debts, shoe repairs, broken glass to fix, pots to purchase, and essentials like meat, sugar, milk, and coal. "Give me a great task, gods! I’ll prove my worth." "Not so," replies the divine; "just keep your head down and work—patch your old coats and hats, weave a shoelace; the important matters and the finest wine will come in time." Well, it’s all an illusion; if we humbly weave a yard of tape as best as we can, in time we'll see that it wasn’t just tape at all, but some galaxy we fashioned, and that the threads were Time and Nature.

We cannot write the order of the variable winds. How can we penetrate the law of our shifting moods and susceptibility? Yet they differ as all and nothing. Instead of the firmament of yesterday, which our eyes require, it is to-day an eggshell which coops us in; we cannot even see what or where our stars of destiny are. From day to day, the capital facts of human life are hidden from our eyes. Suddenly the mist rolls up, and reveals them, and we think how much good time is gone, that might have been saved, had any hint of these things been shown. A sudden rise in the road shows us the system of mountains, and all the summits, which have been just as near us all the year, but quite out of mind. But these alternations are not without their order, and we are parties to our various fortune. If life seem a succession of dreams, yet poetic justice is done in dreams also. The visions of good men are good; it is the undisciplined will that is whipped with bad thoughts and bad fortunes. When we break the laws, we lose our hold on the central reality. Like sick men in hospitals, we change only from bed to bed, from one folly to another; and it cannot signify much what becomes of such castaways,—wailing, stupid, comatose creatures,—lifted from bed to bed, from the nothing of life to the nothing of death.

We can't determine the order of changing winds. How can we understand the laws of our shifting feelings and vulnerabilities? Yet, they can feel like everything and nothing at once. Instead of the solid sky we needed yesterday, today it's like we're trapped in an eggshell; we can’t even see where our guiding stars are. Day by day, the essential truths of human existence are hidden from us. Then suddenly, the fog clears, revealing them, and we think about all the time that has slipped away, which could have been saved if we had glimpsed these truths earlier. A sudden rise in the road shows us the entire mountain range, all the peaks that have been right next to us all year but completely forgotten. But these ups and downs aren’t without their structure, and we play a part in our various fates. Even if life feels like a series of dreams, poetic justice occurs in dreams too. The visions of good people are good; it's the undisciplined will that suffers from negative thoughts and misfortunes. When we break the rules, we lose our grip on the core reality. Like patients in hospitals, we just shift from one bed to another, from one foolishness to another; it hardly matters what happens to such lost souls—crying, dazed, and lifeless beings—moving from bed to bed, from the emptiness of life to the emptiness of death.

In this kingdom of illusions we grope eagerly for stays and foundations. There is none but a strict and faithful dealing at home, and a severe barring out of all duplicity or illusion there. Whatever games are played with us, we must play no games with ourselves, but deal in our privacy with the last honesty and truth. I look upon the simple and childish virtues of veracity and honesty as the root of all that is sublime in character. Speak as you think, be what you are, pay your debts of all kinds. I prefer to be owned as sound and solvent, and my word as good as my bond, and to be what cannot be skipped, or dissipated, or undermined, to all the éclat in the universe. This reality is the foundation of friendship, religion, poetry, and art. At the top or at the bottom of all illusions, I set the cheat which still leads us to work and live for appearances, in spite of our conviction, in all sane hours, that it is what we really are that avails with friends, with strangers, and with fate or fortune.

In this kingdom of illusions, we eagerly search for stability and support. There is nothing but a strict and honest approach at home, and a complete rejection of all deception and illusion there. Whatever games others may play with us, we must not deceive ourselves; we need to engage in our private lives with utmost honesty and truth. I consider the simple and childlike virtues of truthfulness and integrity as the foundation of all that is remarkable in character. Speak your mind, be true to yourself, and fulfill all your obligations. I’d rather be recognized as solid and trustworthy, with my word as reliable as my promises, and to be something that can't be overlooked, wasted, or eroded, rather than chase any kind of superficial glory. This reality is the basis of friendship, faith, poetry, and art. At both the highest and lowest levels of all illusions, I recognize the deception that still drives us to strive and live for appearances, despite our belief during clear moments that it is our true selves that matter to friends, strangers, and fate.

One would think from the talk of men, that riches and poverty were a great matter; and our civilization mainly respects it. But the Indians say, that they do not think the white man with his brow of care, always toiling, afraid of heat and cold, and keeping within doors, has any advantage of them. The permanent interest of every man is, never to be in a false position, but to have the weight of Nature to back him in all that he does. Riches and poverty are a thick or thin costume; and our life—the life of all of us—identical. For we transcend the circumstance continually, and taste the real quality of existence; as in our employments, which only differ in the manipulations, but express the same laws; or in our thoughts, which wear no silks, and taste no ice-creams. We see God face to face every hour, and know the savor of Nature.

One might assume from the conversations of men that wealth and poverty are of great importance and that our civilization mainly values them. But the Native Americans believe that the white man, burdened with worry, endlessly laboring and fearful of the heat and cold, staying indoors, doesn’t have any advantage over them. The true concern for everyone is to avoid being in a false position and to have the support of Nature behind them in all they do. Wealth and poverty are just superficial layers; our lives—everyone's lives—are the same. We constantly rise above our circumstances and experience the true quality of existence; in our work, which only differs in the tasks but communicates the same principles; or in our thoughts, which don’t wear fancy clothes or indulge in ice cream. We see God face to face every hour and understand the essence of Nature.

The early Greek philosophers Heraclitus and Xenophanes measured their force on this problem of identity. Diogenes of Apollonia said, that unless the atoms were made of one stuff, they could never blend and act with one another. But the Hindoos, in their sacred writings, express the liveliest feeling, both of the essential identity, and of that illusion which they conceive variety to be "The notions, 'I am,' and 'This is mine,' which influence mankind, are but delusions of the mother of the world. Dispel, O Lord of all creatures! the conceit of knowledge which proceeds from ignorance." And the beatitude of man they hold to lie in being freed from fascination.

The early Greek philosophers Heraclitus and Xenophanes explored the concept of identity. Diogenes of Apollonia argued that if atoms were not made of the same substance, they could never mix and interact with each other. However, the Hindus, in their sacred texts, articulate a profound understanding of both the essential identity and the illusion they perceive as variety. "The ideas, 'I am,' and 'This is mine,' that influence humanity are just illusions created by the mother of the world. Dispel, O Lord of all creatures! the false sense of knowledge that arises from ignorance." They believe that true happiness for humans comes from being freed from this enchantment.

The intellect is stimulated by the statement of truth in a trope, and the will by clothing the laws of life in illusions. But the unities of Truth and of Right are not broken by the disguise. There need never be any confusion in these. In a crowded life of many parts and performers, on a stage of nations, or in the obscurest hamlet in Maine or California, the same elements offer the same choices to each new comer, and, according to his election, he fixes his fortune in absolute Nature. It would be hard to put more mental and moral philosophy than the Persians have thrown into a sentence:—

The mind is sparked by the expression of truth in a figure of speech, and motivation comes from wrapping the rules of life in illusions. But the essence of Truth and Right remains intact despite the disguise. There should never be any mix-up here. In a busy life filled with various roles and actors, whether on a global stage or in the smallest village in Maine or California, the same elements present the same choices to every newcomer, and based on their decisions, they shape their destiny in the purest sense of Nature. It would be difficult to convey more philosophical thought than the Persians have managed in a single sentence:—

"Fooled thou must be, though wisest of the wise:
Then be the fool of virtue, not of vice."
 
"You must be fooled, even if you are the wisest of the wise:
So be a fool of virtue, not of vice."

There is no chance, and no anarchy, in the universe. All is system and gradation. Every god is there sitting in his sphere. The young mortal enters the hall of the firmament: there is he alone with them alone, they pouring on him benedictions and gifts, and beckoning him up to their thrones. On the instant, and incessantly, fall snow-storms of illusions. He fancies himself in a vast crowd which sways this way and that, and whose movement and doings he must obey: he fancies himself poor, orphaned, insignificant. The mad crowd drives hither and thither, now furiously commanding this thing to be done, now that. What is he that he should resist their will, and think or act for himself? Every moment, new changes, and new showers of deceptions, to baffle and distract him. And when, by and by, for an instant, the air clears, and the cloud lifts a little, there are the gods still sitting around him on their thrones,—they alone with him alone.

There’s no randomness or chaos in the universe. Everything follows a system and a hierarchy. Every god sits in their own realm. The young person steps into the expanse of the sky: there, they're alone with the gods, who shower them with blessings and gifts while inviting them up to their thrones. At every moment, storms of illusions fall around them. They imagine themselves in a huge crowd that moves this way and that, whose actions and will they must follow: they see themselves as poor, alone, and insignificant. The frantic crowd pushes them back and forth, demanding one thing after another. Who are they to resist what the crowd wants and think or act for themselves? Every moment brings new shifts and fresh waves of deception to confuse and distract them. And then, when the air clears for a moment and the fog lifts slightly, the gods are still there, sitting around them on their thrones, just them and the gods, together.

THE END.

THE END.


Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!